Loading...
Resolution 2009-06 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )ss COUNTY OF KENDALL ) RESOLUTION NO. 2009 - C RESOLUTION OF AUTHORIZATION TO PARTICIPATE IN CONGESTION MITIGATION /AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CMAQ) FOR THE KENNEDY ROAD TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville adopted strategic goals in 2008, including goals of enhancing recreational opportunities, increasing environmental consciousness and expanding pedestrian friendly transportation systems, and WHEREAS, the City Council supports providing a system of bike /pedestrian trails within the City of Yorkville, and the connection of said system to regional and state systems of trails, and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered submitting a bike /pedestrian trail grant application attached hereto as Exhibit "A" to the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) to obtain funding, and I WHEREAS, the City Council has learned that said program can provide up to 80% of eligible project costs, and WHEREAS, the project the United City of Yorkville has considered submitting consists of a bike trail that will link residents of the city to an existing trail that links to the shared -use trail system of both the Village of Oswego and the Village of Montgomery; and WHEREAS, the project would provide off -road bicycle access to two elementary schools, a golf course, regional ballfields, commericial centers and several residential developments; and WHEREAS, the project would allow park and ride trail users to easily commute to the park and ride facility via a more direct route; and WHEREAS, the project would provide a non - vehicular connection to the only lighted ballfield complex in the city. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, that the United City of Yorkville hereby authorizes the funding of the 20% local match if awarded the grant funding and authorizes City Staff to make appropriate application to have Kennedy Road trail improvements included in the CMAQ Program. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this Q day of , A.D. 2009. ' 97CTE r R.K ROBYN SUTCLIFF JOSEPH BESCO GARY GOLINSKI ARDEN JOSEPH PLOCHER WALTER WERDERICH MARTY MUNNS V ROSE ANN SPEARS BOB ALLEN Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this o? 7 day of J A nl ltd -P— , A.D. 2009. MAYOR CMAP FY 2010 CMAQ PROJECT APPLICATION FORM BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES PROJECT IDENTIFICATION PROJECT SPONSOR CONTACT INFORMATION — NAME, TITLE, United City of Yorkville, Illinois . AGENCY, ADDRESS, PHONE, E -MAIL (e -mail OTHER AGENCIES PARTICIPATING IN PROJECT required) Travis Miller, Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road TIP PROJECT ID, IF PROJECT IS ALREADY IN FY 09 -12 TIP Yorkville, IL 60560 630.553.8573 tmi Ilernvorkvil leJlA1S II. PROJECT LOCATION Note: Projects not readily identified by location should provide a project title on the last line of the Project Location section NAME OF STREET OR FACILITY TO BE IMPROVED MARKED ROUTE # Kennedy Road PROJECT LIMITS: NORTHWEST REFERENCE POINT /CROSS ST /INTERSECTION MARKED ROUTE # MUNICIPALITY & COUNTY Existing trail at Bailey Road Yorkville: Kendall County PROJECT LIMITS: SOUTH /EAST REFERENCE POINT /CROSS ST/INTERSECTION MARKED ROUTE # MUNICIPALITY & COUNTY Route 47 and Kennedy Road IL 47 / Kennedy Road Yorkville: Kendall County OTHER PROJECT LOCATION INFORMATION OR PROJECT TITLE III. PROJECT FINANCING & CMAQ FUNDING REQUEST TOTAL PHASE CMAQ FUNDS OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS STARTING COSTS REQUESTED List prior CMAQ funding here. YEAR (THOUSANDS) (THOUSANDS) FUND TYPE AMOUNT ENGINEERING PHASE 1 2010 $ 80,900.00 $ 64,720.00 I $ ENGINEERING PHASE 2 2011 $ 80,900.00 $ 64,720.00 $ RIGHT -OF -WAY 2008 $ 50,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION 2012 $ 889,860.00 $ 711,888.00 I $ (INCLUDING CONST ENG) ENGINEERING (FOR $ $ I $ IMPLEMENTATION PROJECTS) IMPLEMENTATION $ $ $ ALTERNATIVES $ $ $ ANALYSIS TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $1,101,660.00 $ 881,328.00 SOURCE OF LOCAL MATCHING FUNDS: I GEN -OP NOTE: IF SOFT MATCHING FUNDS ARE INTENDED TO BE USED, PLEASE CONTACT CMAP STAFF. HAVE THE MATCHING FUNDS BEEN ,ECURED (PROVIDE DETAILS): 1 CMAP FY 2010 CMAQ PROJECT APPLICATION FORM BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES - PAGE 2 W. PROJECT EMISSIONS BENEFIT DATA TYPE OF PROJECT (CHECK PRIMARY USE): El BICYCLE FACILITY ❑ PEDESTRIAN FACILITY MILES OF EXISTING BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES INTERSECTING THE PROPOSED FACILITY: _12.71_ IDENTIFY INTERSECTING FACILITIES: Project provides critical linkage to over 12.71 miles of trail and sidewalk and will be a part of Yorkville's approximately 130 miles of planned trail network. From southwest to northeast: Marketview Drive running south (sidewalk); McHugh Drive running south (sidewalk); Prairie Meadows Drive running south (sidewalk); Autumn Creek trail running southeast (trail); Bristol Ridge Road running southeast (trail); Freedom Place running east (trail); Grande Reserve trail running north and east (trail); Bailey Road running east (sidewalk) TRIP ATTRACTORS LINKED DIRECTLY TO THE PROPOSED FACILITY: From the southwest to the northeast: Beginning at Route 47, Marketview Drive connects to restaurants, commercial stores and the Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department REC Center, the City's indoor athletic facility. Heading further northeast, McHugh Drive connects to Riemenschneider Park where Yorkville's firefighter memorial and spray park is located. Just beyond the park is the Post Office. Continuing from the intersection of McHugh and Kennedy, the project will intersect with Autumn Creek Boulevard which connects to the Autumn Creek Elementary School scheduled to open August 2009. At the Emerald Lane intersection, the project will connect to existing trail that traverses through Autumn Creek to Yorkville's transportation themed park and location of `safety town', which teaches children the rules of the road. Also, at the Emerald Lane intersection the project would join to existing trail along Kennedy. Just beyond the Autumn ;reek development, the project would link to the Grande Reserve trail at its current southernmost point. Continuing along Kennedy Road, the trail would pass the Blackberry Oaks golf course and restaurant, and connect to the existing trail segment linking to Grande Reserve Elementary School. The final link would be across the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Tracks to the existing trail that passes the site of the future Disc Golf course (park is scheduled for construction in 2010). Also at this terminus is the lighted ballfield complex, Steven G. Bridge Park, which hosts games and practices everyday during baseball season, May to October, generating over 1,500 vehicle trips per week. Over 850 homes, approximately 2,253 residents, are located within a half -mile of this facility. OFF- STREET BICYCLE FACILITY - PROVIDE TRAFFIC VOLUMES, SPEEDS AND PERCENT TRUCKS ON ADJACENT ROADWAY. IN ADDITION, PLEASE IDENTIFY EXISTING DESIGNATED BICYCLE FACILITIES IN THE PROXIMITY OF THE PROPOSED FACILITY. SUPPLY A MAP FROM RELEVANT BICYCLE PLAN(S), IF AVAILABLE. ADT (as of 2006) — From Route 47 east to Bristol Ridge Road — 2,250 @ 2% trucks* (* estimated percentage); from Bristol Ridge Road to Mill Road — 2,400 @ 2% trucks* (* estimated percentage) Posted Speed — 45 MPH V. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION IS RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT? D YES ❑ NO IF SO, HAS RIGHT -OF -WAY BEEN ACQUIRED? ❑ YES ENO INDICATE THE STATUS OF THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN: ❑ N.A. ❑ Not Begun ElUnderway ❑ Submitted ❑ Approved ESTIMATED COMPLETIO N YEAR: 2012 VI. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND MAP i 1. PLEASE DESCRIBE PROJECT. FOR OUTREACH, PROMOTION OR MARKETING EFFORTS GIVE SPECIFIC DETAILS OF THE CAMPAIGN. DESCRIBE THE COORDINATION OF THESE EFFORTS WITH RESPECT TO OTHER SUCH CAMPAIGNS (SEE SECTION I.6 ON PAGE 31 OF THE INSTRUCTIONS): f he United City of Yorkville is the county seat of Kendall County. It has the distinction of being the fastest growing county in the nation. With a population increase of 77.5% from 2000 to 2007 (according to the United States Census Bureau). Between the 2000 decennial Census and the 2005 Yorkville Special Census Yorkville's population increased 81% from 6,189 to 11,204. Yorkville staff projected the 2007 population at 15,240, a 36% increase in population in two years. This burgeoning population requires both increased transportation planning and non - vehicular transportation opportunities to accommodate the concomitant increase ADT. The United City of Yorkville works with IDOT (Illinois Tomorrow Corridor Planning Program Grant) and IDNR (Bike Path Program) as well as local agencies and surrounding municipalities to update and implement its community shared -use trail plan. The project addressed in this application is a priority for ADT reduction, public safety, and the presence of regional trip attractors. The Kennedy Road trail project connects commercial centers, the REC center, Post Office, spray park, two elementary schools, golf course, several residential developments, regional ballfields, and to Villages of Oswego and Montgomery in a safe off -road shared -use trail. This furthers trails built in conjunction with local developers of master - planned communities with internal trail systems that currently do not link together, and also to trails in the surrounding communities of Oswego and Montgomery. The project also meets objectives of United City of Yorkville Bike /Pedestrian Plans, United City of Yorkville Comprehensive Plan, and Kendall County Forest Preserve District Trails and Greenways Plan. The project connects to the Grande Reserve Trail in three locations. Of these locations, the two links south of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks connect to the Oswego Park and Ride, located along Mill Road just west of Orchard Road. This project would provide Yorkville residents commuting to the Oswego Park and Ride a direct route to the facility. The project will also offer residents not connected to the Grande Reserve Trail the option of utilizing alternative transportation to the Park and Ride. The one link north of the tracks connects the City of Yorkville to the Village of Oswego's and subsequently to the Village of Montgomery's shared -use trail systems. The project would also provide a safe pedestrian crossing of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad tracks, as none currently exists. The lack of a pedestrian crossing of the railroad tracks is not only a safety concern, but also a deterrent to utilizing alternative transportation. In addition, the trail will provide a non - vehicular connection to the only lighted ballfield complex in the City which , enerates approximately 1,500 vehicle trips a week during baseball season. Lastly, the trail will provide a safe route for children in ,,eighboring developments to access the two school locations along the route. 2. PROJECT MAP. PLEASE ATTACH A MAP TO THE APPLICATION FORM. INFORMATION MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO ACCURATELY LOCATE THE PROJECT ON A LOCAL STREET MAP. HAND DRAWN MAPS OR MAPS PRODUCED BY GIS SYSTEMS ARE ACCEPTABLE. MAPS FROM TELEPHONE BOOKS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 3. CMAQ FY 2008 PEDESTRIAN FACILITY SUPPLEMENT. IF THE PROPOSED FACILITY IS PRIMARILY A PEDESTRIAN FACILITY, COMPLETE THE PEDESTRIAN FACILITY SUPPLEMENT. 4. Planning Liaison Reviewed (see pp 18 -20 of application book for your Liaison; applications are due to the Liaison by January 23, 2009) ❑ Complete ❑ Missing information — must be completed before application will be processed ❑ Missing information that will result in immediate rejection CMAQ FY 2010 PROJECT SCOPING REPORT FOR PROPOSED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, BOTTLENECK ELIMINATIONS, BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN, AND COMMUTER PARKING FACILITY PROJECTS FOR PROJECTS FOR WHICH A PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REPORT IS NOT NOW BEING REVIE14 PART I. OVERVIEW COMMON ROUTE NAME: KENNEDY ROAD ROUTE MARKING: N/A LIMITS: FROM: IL ROUTE 47 TO: BAILY ROAD COUNTY: KENDALL FIELD /SITE REVIEW DATE: JANUARY 5, 2009 FIELD REVIEW PARTICIPANTS: JOE WYWROT (CITY ENGINEER) JASON BAUER, TIM WEIDNER (ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC.) JURISDICTIONS INVOLVED: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KEY PEOPLE: Name TRAVIS MILLER Name JOE WYWROT Title COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIR. Title CITY ENGINEER Phone /fax (630)553 -8573 / (630)553 -3436 Phone /fax (630)553 -8527 / (630)553 -3436 i PART II. EXISTING CONDITIONS VERTICAL CLEARANCE RESTRICTIONS (existing profile /overhead structures): N/A HORIZONTAL RESTRICTIONS (ROW /sidewalks /curb & gutter /buildings): N/A UNUSUAL SOIL CONDITIONS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ wetlands ❑ cattails in ditches ❑ bogs ❑ dry land bridges ❑contaminated soil UTILITIES INVOLVED (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ electrical ❑ gas ❑ telephone ❑ cable ❑ sewer ❑ water ❑ pipelines ❑ other SPECIAL SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS (high accident spots and sections): N/A CROSSED OR ADJACENT BRIDGES: ❑ Applicable (Complete and include one or more copies of Attachment 1) ❑x Not Applicable SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: ❑ Applicable: Complete and include for each intersection: • one copy of Attachment 2 • two Input Module Worksheets (one for current conditions and one for conditions after the proposed project) • if signals are actuated, the Actuated Controller Properties page of the Input Module Worksheet • As many Actuated Controller Coordination pages of the Input Module Worksheet as warranted, i.e., based on extended side - street leading left -turn phases ❑x Not Applicable UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS NEEDING UPDATE: ❑x Applicable: Complete and include for each intersection: • one copy of Attachment 3 • two Input Module Worksheets (one for current conditions and one for conditions after the proposed project) ❑ Not Applicable DRAINAGE DATA: ❑x Complete and include one or more copies of Attachment 4 RAILROADS: Z Applicable (Complete and include one or more copies of Attachment 5) ❑ Not Applicable 2 PART III. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SPECIAL DATA locumented (IDNR) or possible wetlands: ❑ Yes 9 No: Location(s) Parks or Forest Preserve: ❑ Yes 0 No: Location(s) 4(f) Involvement ❑ Definite ❑ Possible Cultural resource involvement (check all that apply): ❑ Historic district ❑ Historic structure ❑ Historical marker ❑ Other eligible historic designations ❑ Other cultural resources Location(s) Adjacent land use (Check all that apply) ❑x Residential ❑ Office /Retail ❑ Schools ❑ Industrial ❑ Park or Forest Preserve ❑ Other Institutional Hazardous materials (UST, LUST, other hazardous waste sites) ❑ Yes Z No Potential contaminated soils: ocal Acceptability (a federally accepted public involvement program will be prepared during project development) Is there local public support, generally? ❑x Yes ❑ No Has the affected public been involved /informed? ❑x Yes ❑ No How? PROJECT DISCUSSED AT 1/27/09 CITY COUNCIL MEETING IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON CITY BIKE PATH AND PEDESTRIAN LONG TERM PLAN 3 PART IV. PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK Engineering (Enter cost if eligible for federal funding): Phase I (preliminary design) $ 73,600 % complete 0 Months to complete _12 Phase II (plans, specs and estimates) $ 73,600 % complete 0 Months to complete 6 Right of way needed: ❑ No 0 Yes: Estimated cost $ 50,000 Utility Relocation ❑x No ❑ Yes: Cost $ Construction: Cost $ 808,860.00 Months to complete: 6 Calendar Year 2012 (INCLUDE DETAILED COST ESTIMATE FOR CONSTR UCTION ITEMS ON FOLLOWING PAGE). Proposed cross section(s) /dimensions (If applicable): Number of through lanes (Roads): Pavement width 10 (BIKE PATH) Shoulder or parkway width: N/A Median: 19 None ❑ Raised❑ Flush ❑ Mixed Square feet (Parking) Project Length: 11,250 Check all that apply, and complete number where applicable. • Intersection improvements (Number ❑ Bottleneck elimination • New traffic signals (Number ❑ Traffic signal modernization (Number • Signals to be interconnected (Number ❑ Structural improvements • Pedestrian/bicycle accommodations (Describe ❑ Roadside Improvements (Retaining walls, below. Include limits and connecting facilities) positive barriers, etc.) • Train Station Improvements ❑ New/Relocated Train Station • Railroad Grade Crossing Improvements ❑x ADA Access Improvements • Landscaping ❑ Commuter Parking (Number of spaces For all items checked above, describe improvements in the space below. Attach additional sheets if necessary. Construct new 10' wide bike trail from existing sidewalk at IL Route 47 and existing trail system at Bailey Road, 11,250 feet to the northeast. System will be constructed in existing R.O.W. and dedicated easements currently in place for the purposes of this bike trail, with the exception of two parcels that will reauire bike path easements, negotiations are underway with the owners of those two parcels. The construction of this trail will connect to 12.71 of existing sidewalk and bike trail systems in this area of the City and provide links to various restaurants, the Yorkville Parks and Recreation REC Center, the City's indoor athletic field, various parks, the Post Office, the Blackberry Golf Course, the Oswego Park and Ride. the Autumn Creek Elementary School and the Steven G. Bridge Park which is active from May to October and currently generates over 1,500 vehicle trips per week. Drainage: ❑ Urban (Enclosed) Z Rural (Open) Is detention required? ❑ No 9 Yes (If yes, check type below) ❑ In line detention ❑ New outlets (Where ?) ❑ Detention basin ❑x Detention off -site Detention Already Design and Constructed in Adiacent Developments 4 DETAILED ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total 1 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (PRIME COAT) GAL 6,880.00 $2.00 $13,760.00 2 EARTH EXCAVATION CU YD 5,350.00 $40.00 $214,000.00 3 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, TYPE B TON 9,630.00 $20.00 $192,600.00 4 HOT -MIX ASPHALT SC, MIX "C ", N50 TON 1,440.00 $85.00 $122,400.00 5 RESTORATION SQ YD 7,500.00 $15.00 $112,500.00 6 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION EACH 1.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 7 SIGNS EACH 10.00 $500.00 $5,000.00 8 TREE REMOVAL EACH 20.00 $500.00 $10,000.00 9 REPLACEMENT TREES EACH 40.00 $250.00 $10,000.00 10 RAILROAD CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS FOOT 25.00 $2,000.00 I $50,000.00 11 I CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING HOURS 736.00 +� $100.00 $73,600.00 I I I TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION ITEMS $808,860.00 ESTIMATES MUST BE BASED UPON QUANTITIES AND UNIT COSTS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. LUMP SUM AMOUNTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. II I 5 'I ATTACHMENT 1 - CROSSED OR ADJACENT BRIDGES FILL OUT OR ATTACH IDOT MASTER STRUCTURE REPORT FOR EACH (2 PERPAGE) I Location: n/a a) Waterway or facility crossed: b) Roadway width (Face of curb to face of curb): c) Structure width (Outside of parapet to outside of parapet): Structure length: d) Structure type (Concrete, steel or timber): e) Structure waterway opening (Clearance /freeboard consideration): f) Channel conditions (Any debris or scour problems): g) IL Division of Natural Resources (IDNR) permits: ❑ No ❑ Yes h) Approach conditions: i) Structure Jurisdiction, if other than sponsor: Location: a) Waterway or facility crossed: b) Roadway width (Face of curb to face of curb): c) Structure width (Outside of parapet to outside of parapet): Structure length: d) Structure type (Concrete, steel or timber): e) Structure waterway opening (Clearance /freeboard consideration): f) Channel conditions (Any debris or scour problems): I I g) IL Division of Natural Resources (IDNR) permits: ❑ No ❑ Yes h) Approach conditions: i) Structure Jurisdiction, if other than sponsor 6 I ATTACHMENT 2 - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS FILL OUT FOR EACH SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION Provide Existing and Proposed Conditions for Each Item Location: n/a a. Conditions: On the HCM Input Module Worksheet, indicate /sketch the number of through and shared lanes, all designated turn pockets and the length of all turn pockets, lane width for all lanes, percent grade, free flow speed and saturation flow rate for all legs within the intersection, right turn on red allowed or prohibited, and provide separate right turn and right turn on red volumes. b. Type of controller ❑ Pretimed ❑ Semi - Actuated ❑ Fully Activated If the controller is actuated, please provide a layout for all actuated legs of the intersection with the following information: detector distance from stop line, detector length, delay time and carry -over. If using IDOT's standard for detector loop layout, a copy of the standard containing the above required detector information will suffice. C. Pedestrian signals: ❑ No ❑ Yes: Locations: d. Sidewalksibicycle facilities: ❑ Sidewalk ❑ Bicycle /Multi -Use ❑ Neither Locations: e. Preemption (Railroad /fire /emergency vehicle): ❑ No ❑ Yes: Locations: f. Describe parking and parking restrictions and identify any bus stops in the vicinity. g. Do current signals meet MUTCD standards? ❑ No ❑ Yes h. Is intersection a part of a current signal interconnect system? ❑ No ❑ Yes: Limits: Jurisdictions involved: i. Operational deficiencies: 7 ATTACHMENT 3 - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS NEEDING UPDATE FILL OUT FOR EACH UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION (2 {PER PAGE) Provide Existing and Proposed Conditions for Each Item Location: Kennedy Road at Emerald Lane a. Conditions: On the HCM Input Module Worksheet, indicate /sketch the number of through and shared lanes, all designated turn pockets and the length of all turn pockets, lane width for all lanes, percent grade, free flow speed and saturation flow rate for all legs within the intersection. b. Traffic Control (4 -way stop, two -way stop, etc.) 2 -way stop (existing) 2 -way stop (proposed) C. Other Conditions: N/A d. Sidewalks /bicycle facilities: ❑ Sidewalk 0 Bicycle /Multi -Use ❑ Neither Locations: West side of Emerald Lane (existing) Multi -use path on south side of Kennedy (proposed) d. Special Problems: N/A ..� Location: Kennedy Road at Bristol Ridge Road a. Conditions: On the HCM Input Module Worksheet, indicate /sketch the number of through and shared lanes, all designated turn pockets and the length of all turn pockets, lane width for all lanes, percent grade, free flow speed and saturation flow rate for all legs within the intersection. b. Traffic Control (4 -way stop, two -way stop, etc.) 4 -way stop (existing) 4 -way stop (proposed) C. Other Conditions: Existing crosswalks across wets and south legs of intersection d. Sidewalks /bicycle facilities: 0 Sidewalk Z Bicycle /Multi -Use ❑ Neither Locations: Existing sidewalk on north and south (west leg of intersection), existing Multi -Use path (existing — east side of intersection), proposed multi -use path on south side of intersection. fintersection d. Special Problems: N/A 8 Check: Highway cap M anua l 2000 Q Before improvement both before and after ❑After improvement worksheets are required INPUT WORKSHEET 0 ypa& � t77 Analyst Intersection p� -,47- &/ L -a i_U, Agency or company 1 4-m - a o --/-r r or yo�,Z Area Typo ❑ COD )ECQ11or Date Performed � 1 olq Jurisdiction 'KC)r2_k_lf I (_td Analysis Time Period Analysis Year 7_0o q qq "'$J _ 0 grade= CO = Pedestrian Button Lane Width ,. :._..._.._< ShowNor(hAirw if) grade = C) Through ... ... . .. ... ... Right include turning Left bay length Through Right ad )46N)V6Oj Left Through Stroet Left PJghl Left + Through + Right Z T grade= o . :A4 EB we NO SB LT_ TH RTI LT TH RTI LT TH RT LT I TH I RT Volume, V (veh/h) 11 % heavy vehicles, % HV Peak-hour factor, PHIF i ; , I I I j Prelimed (P) oractuated (A) Start-up lost time, I I (s) Extension of effective green time, e (s) Arrival type, AT Approach pedestrian volume? Vod WIN I Approach bicycle volume, v (bicycles/h) Parking (Y or N) Parking maneuvers, N (maneuvers/h) Bus stopping, N (buses/h) 1 6 Min. timing for peclostdans.� G (s) W k Kim R 1K I D 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 A G R A M Timing G= 6 = G 0 1Y= Y= 1Y= Y Y = Y Y Y Protected turns A Permitted turns Cycle length, C Peclosidan N " , - S A - M." I 1.1N M'. _­M L RT volumes, as shown. exclude RTOR. 2. Approach pedestrian and bicycle volumes are those that conflict with right turns from the subject approach, 3. Refer to Equation 16-2. Chapter 16 - Signalized Intersections Check: Highway Capacity Manual 2000 0 Before improvement both before and after ®After improvement Worksheets are required j INPUT WORKSHEET Oen raf lnfprmatlo" _. ,. ... .. ... .. - i . �`1. -ter 5! i .f.�.. 4.. _i.... � `.�(; Ff.. _..•8 Analyst Intersection P—p QT 4 -1j, Agency or company a Area Type ❑ CBD ,IIIther Dale Performed Jurisdiction Y rzl-_l/I Lc6 Analysis Time Period bm bea Analysis Year ZD9 Jn "terse. �: - >.�':.1 „_: :,,;_... - .,F.; ::.ti• grade= . -. _ ” __ (.........__ p ........................... , J CD = Pedestrian Button = Lane Width grade= GX = Through =Right include turning 1 = Left bay length .: lP � �/' = Through +Right grade = 0 � / = Leh +Through Street R ,. Ho rf rJS PaT1 4 \I = Left +Right f I _ = Left + Through + Right . •,. _ -� - : � grade= � � Volumeand•;TJriiing- Input: f ?" j EB WB NB I SB LT Volume, V (vehlh) I LT TH RT ' LT TH RT LT TH RT TH RT1 I � % heavy vehicles, % HV Peak -hour factor, PHF Prelimed (P) or actuated (A) Start -up lost time, I J Extension of effective green time, a (s) Arrival type, AT Approach pedestrian volume? V d (p /h) Approach bicycle volume,? v (bicycles /h)i 1 i I Parking (Y or N) Parking maneuvers, N. (maneuvers/h) Bus slopping, N (buses /h) I Min. timing for pedestri ans, GP � na i`P s ha - J .'lal' h... - 5. - %r 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 I A G R A M Timing I- I Y= I Y= Y= I Y= I G G G Y - -- Y= Y= IY= Protected turns A Permitted turns - Pedes(rian I Cycle length, C = , s - tes rc, I. RT volumes, as shown, exclude RTOR. ' 2. Approach pedestrian and bicycle volumes are those that conflict with right turns Irom the sub)ect approach. 3. Refer to EQualion 16 -2. J Chapter 16 - Signalized Intersections Check: Highway Capacity Manual 2000 © Before improvement both before and after ❑After improvement worksheets are required INPU WORKSHEET _ _ _ ,..• i "��'' ?= ���,:� ; <r, " �- 2.5R;.�'.' �.:9�; :L1�la: ne.x: "' „4�� -.•r:: Generallnformato' •� '`. ?!.' .� c,:% �;�n Analyst Intersection 1 q %RcA pl D6,!F gyp Agency or Company ur Ti!5FD rr Y vF' Yorz (lit_c6 Area Type ❑ CBD ECOlher Date Performed L -2 -010 1 Jurisdiction Y 9 f' - V 1 Lam,, � Analysis Time Period Peak Analysis Year 2� 1ntr =CSec ron �eometr=..: - .: .::.', .•'.; , :�c;:• - - °='�'� _.I?., .„. ~..: CA = Pedestrian Button CO N N� o Shownurmarwt —� - Lane Width c� grade= Through U� t - ( f � 9 1 Right -� o include turning N I = Leff bay length Through +Right grade_ % \ Left +Through Street .� = Left +Righl = Left + Through + Right - - - - - l <;.• - i- 1'af: -� - _ - - .fit :.,,. olu e a`d: i n T `n In m m1 6t.: j EB WB' NB :SB... Volume, V (veh /h) LT TH RTI ' LT TH RTI I LT TH RTI LT TH RTI , � % heavy vehicles, % HV Peak -hour factor, PHf Prelimed (P) or actuated (A) Start -up lost lime, II (s) Extension of effective green time, a (s) Arrival type, AT Approach pedestrian volume? Vmd (p /h) i + Approach bicycle volume, (bicycles /h)� Parking (Y or N) Parking maneuvers, N (maneuvers/h) Bus slopping, N (buses/h) I 0 Min. timing for pedestrians ,b G (s) "'r' xS nalzP �asln' ' ". _ ,;_.... - ,...:.,"vo-:u:�e ._ ,.�.. •.:'is....I;r'fi ?� „ >,f., ; ?:.: it s - .... I D 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 A G R A M Timing G= I G= I G= G= I G= I G= I G= I G= Y= Y= Y= Y= Y= Y= I Y= Y= Protected turns ! Permitted turns -1 . _ ” - - Pedgslripn I Cycle length, C = s J Notes. , 1. RT volumes, as shown, exclude RTOR. 2. Approach pedestrian and bicycle volumes are those that conflict with right lums from the subject approach. 3. Refer to EQualion 16 -2. J Chapter 16 - Signalized Intersections Check: Highway Capacity Manua12000 0 Before improvement both before and after ®After improvement worksheets are required INPUT WORKSHEET _ �' `!: - ..ar "i;: • >,n:; _ ::_P� �"s r h 5'a r .3' - M ►�Ta v fIl 10. ; ?�= . "ii l�,r� tt'� � d'"e i� :;�rf -ter•' fk Geiiefa f r at,.: _ r'r x;'1 •:�:- # I , sz;y rs °` yr��� ,� • ,` s as.. 6.. Pti `•1 :9�M1�:a'L�k:3C:ai Analyst Interseclion KE'NNt5oY RO, Ar 06E gyp, Agency or company Oat rEo r `f or Yo rzriln cE Area Type ❑ CBD Xother Date Performed t .1 -2 -o f o 1 Jurisdiction ) g - K - V I Analysis Time Period pm pea Analysis Year - rt ;ZE:' at[ ", "H i.` , E�Y;i'_fi!'•' '=Yi ^t urx[cr 1 9 Wo. : iC:i?iti�v:...i;.�:t�:�' -�;?s` �S.e; y .. �.._...�...,- _.. " CO = Pedestrian Button a.. =Lane Width ShowNoithkwN grade= y�° = Through Right include turning ; I....: .._, = Left bay length cV ' = Thraugh +Right Wide= 6)% Left +Through Street H VLt"t U:56 r '�41 I = LeH +Right ham- - - ^ ^�� = Left + Through +Right I : grade= :f -jr�_ .I ;-- sl�..r.,..i- �'9ti11 ;?;.•i��.v.W:f^; ?:(:��J:t iVoliliileand;.1'lmlri' :�ln u 4kl[3 :.; i. _ 1 `�: "1, ! a �a9: ' ; .. _ .. ' ..<.,.. __,_,- an,�:: .. ....�;b��±i1!h: w r;, I .,,�., W8 I .... � NB SB �, EB LT TH RT' I LT TH RT' ) LT TH IT' Li TH Volume, V (veh /h) RT1 f � � � � I � % heavy vehicles, % HV Peak -hour factor, PHF Prelimed (P) or actuated (A) Start -up lost time, I, (s) Extension of effective green time, a (s) I Arrival type, AT I I I I Approach pedestrian volume? v ced (p /h) ) Approach bicycle volume, Vb,, (bicyclos/h)I I I I Parking (Y or N) I N I N I N I N Parking maneuvers, N,, (maneuvers/h) I I I I Bus slopping, N (buses/h) I 0 ( O I D I (2 Min. timing for pedestrians , 3 G , <rcf'!n" �): ^: � n :.,3•.� - �Wn1 :y �P;:l:::•�*�vrhf {) < -' /fa! l.s�wllF1J.! 'i�5 - • :,Y s.'l.. Lv ^'•i.�F1;:+, m -19��7 _{ IJ:`CT!'T P y' .,xy ..vpJriY.?_ L" �" '��53��i�:v�sii`Nf., +:i:,"V<?- 0 01 02 03 04 05 06 0T 08 I A G R A M Timing IG I G= G- G= G= G= Y= Y= I Y= I Y= I Y= I Y= I Y= I Y= J� Protected turns _ _ tu rns = ,. - A Permitted lu �edQS,(rian Cycle length C s ,. _i;!:e .'t:,`,.,� is;.s F;.` .Sr;�Sfi:d..fTeEaak;:�."e?: ,a•_�r - • ^.; f Ys = -,`a^ A . RTVOIUmes �° �- •� ' �_ � -r�•: r� � � n � tt r: ;leg - �:.::x. ':t - :.�.;.. '.: T•: �:�7:i �� ' 1_ � .�j�j -- �j'lar AY.. ` i��''' � . 7t_ l .� f K4�:': .. I , as shown, exclude R10R 2. Approach pedestrian and bicycle volumes are [hose that conflict with right turns from the subject approach. 3. Refer to Eaualion 16 -2. l Chapter 16 - Signalized Intersections I ATTACHMENT 4 - DRAINAGE DATA COMPLETE FOR EACH DRAINAGE BASIS (2 PER PAGE) Location: Kennedv Road a. Existing drainage type (Open /closed): Open Ditch Drainage to Closed Storrn sewer in adiacent residential developments — - -- b. Existing drainage problems: N/A C. Flood plains (Transverse /longitudinal): N/A d. Regulatory (FEMA) Floodways: N/A C. Major drainage structures: N/A £ Outfall conditions: Ditches enter storm sewer systems in adiacent developments sized to accommodate the stormwater from the proposed path. All facilities have properly sized restrictors to permit proper release rates prior to release to the Blackberry Creek and ultimatelv the Fox River. g. Comments (Realignment /cost participation/jurisdictional transfer): N / A_ Location: a. Existing drainage type (Open /closed): b. Existing drainage problems: C. Flood plains (Transverse /longitudinal): d. Regulatory (FEMA) Floodways: e. Major drainage structures: f. Outfall conditions: g. Comments (Realignment /cost participation /jurisdictional transfer): 9 ATTACHMENT 5 - RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT COMPLETE FOR EACH RAILROAD (2 PER PAGE) location: Kennedy Road BNSF RR Crossing, Inventory No. 079V, Mile Post 44.52 a. Railroad name: Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Comranv b. Existing Type of Crossing: (Timber, rubberized, concrete, asphalt, other) Timber C. Number of tracks Active: 2 Abandoned: 0 Mainline: 2 Secondary /Spur: 0 d. Width of crossing (Indicate feet or meters) 24 feet e. Other Conditions: f. Type of Protection (Gates, flashing lights, bells, crossbucks only, other): Gates g. Number of trains passing through crossing during the peak p.m. hour 2 Total time crossing is blocked by trains during the peak p.m. hour 2 min Note: these data are best obtained by direct field observation, preferably over several days. Contact CMAP staff with questions. h. Accommodation for pedestrians or bicyclists crossing the railroad tracks? 9 No ❑ Yes: Describe: Protection Devices (If any): i. Are there any signalized intersections within 200 feet of the railroad crossing? O No ❑ Yes: j. Are there railroads immediately adjacent to the project, but not crossed? 9 No ❑ Yes: Name Description Location: a. Railroad name: b. Existing Type of Crossing: (Timber, rubberized, concrete, asphalt, other) C. Number of tracks Active: Abandoned: Mainline: Secondary /Spur: d. Width of crossing (Indicate feet or meters) e. Other Conditions: f. Type of Protection (Gates, flashing lights, bells, crossbucks only, other): g. Number of trains passing through crossing in peak p.m. hour Total time crossing is blocked by trains during the peak p.m. hour Note: these data are best obtained by direct field observation, preferably over several days. Contact CMAP staff with questions. h. Accommodation for pedestrians or bicyclists crossing the railroad tracks? ❑ No ❑ Yes: Describe: Protection Devices (If any): k. Are there any signalized intersections within 200 feet of the railroad crossing? ❑ No ❑ Yes: 1. Are there railroads immediately adjacent to the project, but not crossed? ❑ No ❑ Yes: Name Description 10 P R _ FUTURE BIKE PATH W EXISTING BIKE PATH F r CMAC APPLICATION BIKE PATH g 51 PARK Sri M ILL RD v% E STATE OWNED OPEN SPACE OTHER COMMUNITY RESOURCE b 2 1 C� TOWN 0FBRIST ' I �; l'�� '�' �i, i ♦. r L rS� ���frN - _ , `, jt lk��' .1 _ _ ' !r I '�I' rVi � I � � I y o ��••f ` I r� � - - �, r� � � 7�^ f� - w - _ _ 1 _ ✓� .; - }1 u ,Y�� r " j I 4. J E -Mi 4 7;:;P _1�� 4 1 10 I WN '�',y( :�o a � ; ' -{ � I ^, r , a f s +n d e jf— "A Np "i7 7I' lry J., ROUT 3,4; O , �;, � '4 � I I X;� :41� 11 - VI 01 m 14w �A nl� . 1 Gm.Y - _ = i - � ° I'a,�.; 1 . F' � r r'� .k •r t �!5 _ ' ^r 17 4 G4 t, � �,r��-�-���Kr`�` r���� n �'�� 7\� I -0�. � ♦ I _ 18 vm XI ­ 3 .t; r'Z � +'Iy � �. �^'ht, r �!�+� � ��F' ���, Irl �i 111 r 4:n � "' ,Y J }r' _" .�. .I ! rr [ ♦ , Ak '"`f - .�' - , 1 � k' - -t( 7v iA ta'"C ,�'.a, I 'll 1 OST 0=aJC= U -C C�%' E z� E3 SC AR Y r JI mg 0 21000 POLICE PUBLIC V'v'0RKq CC)URTHO­S= 'II '14 FEET �rl f ,y + -r��. a+r ��— Yr - 1 r l i f 4 eM }I r9 4, � RRE h 1 GOVERNMENT PARK or,_= coUL"ISE ii I Engineering Enterprises, Inc. CONGESTION MITIGATION PROJECT LOCATION 52 T AND AIR QUALITY (CMA I. PROJECT APPLICATION KENNEDY ROAD :,: 7 BIKE TRAIL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 'I -O T 14 Congestion Mitigation /Air Quality Improvement Program Transportation Control Measure Committal Agreement One copy of this page must be completed and signed by each sponsor of proposed FY 2010 CMAQ projects. The project sponsor certifies that it is willing and able to manage, maintain, and operate the project(s). The project sponsor possesses legal authority to nominate the CMAQ project proposal(s) and to finance, acquire, and construct the proposed project(s); and by this committal agreement the sponsor authorizes the submittal of the CMAQ project(s), including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizes the person identified as the project contact to act in connection with the proposal(s) and to provide such additional information as may be required. The project sponsor will cause work on the project(s) to be commenced within a reasonable time after receipt of notification from the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning that the project has been selected and that the project will be carried to completion with reasonable diligence. Whereas the CMAQ program funds transportation control measures (TCM), the sponsor agrees that, if selected, the project(s) may be included as a TCM in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for attaining the applicable national ambient air quality standards. Inclusion of CMAQ projects in the SIP will follow procedures established by the CMAQ Project Selection Committee. The sponsor will provide any tracking information required in a timely fashion. Name: Valerie Burd (Please print) Title: Mayor (Please print) l l - a • - (Signature) v (Date) Project Sponsor: United City of Yorkville CMAQ PROJECT MILESTONE SCHEDULE Sponsor: United City of Yorkville Contact Information Project Kennedy Road Bike Trail Municipal Contact Travis Miller (630/553 -8573) Scope of Work: Construct Bike Trail Along Kennedy Road Council /Liaison Kane Kendal Council of Mayors/ Mike Sullivan Section #: TBD Consultant Engineering Enterprises, Inc. TIP #: TBD Consultant Contact Jason Bauer (6301466 -9350) TIP Year: TBD IDOT TBD Construction Cost $808,860.00 Completed? If Yes, When If No, When Is (Yes /No) Completed Completion Expected Notes IDOT Phase I Kick -off Meeting No February 2010 1 st State/Federal Coordination Meeting No June 2010 Categorical Exclusion Concurrence No July 2010 Design Variance Concurrence No July 2010 Submit Draft Phase I Report (PDR) allow 3 to 6 months for IDOT review No August 2010 Public Hearing /Meeting (or N /A) No August 2010 Submit Final Phase I Report (PDR) allow 1 to 3 months for IDOT review No Jaunary 2011 Phase I Design Approval No March 2010 Submit Pre -Final Plans and Estimates allow 1 to 4 months for IDOT review No July 2011 Submit Final Plans (PS &E) No September 2011 ghti- of- lNay;{only COmplefe' 1py project requires.Ri' ht- of =.Wa ;. g In antic] ation o Right-of-Way Kick -off Meeting p f this project, the City prepared' plat's of dedictaiori and ROW Negotiations Initiation Yes November 2008 submitted to the property owners for review. allow at least 9 to 18 months No September 2010 ROW Acquisition Complete No September 2011 Construction Letting January 2012 See IDOT Local Roads' Mechanics of Project Management "Federal Aid Project Initiation to Completion" Flow Chart for sequence of events and estimated review times. Prepared by: Jason M. Bauer, P.E. Date: January 9, 2009