The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet 2012 07-24-12 C United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST. 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 o Is ur Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 <LE AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, July 24, 2012 Call to Order: Pledge of Allegiance: Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD 11 WARD III WARD IV George Gilson,Jr. Jackie Milschewski Marty Munns Rose Ann Spears Carlo Colosimo Larry Kot Chris Funkhouser Diane Teeling Establishment of Quorum: Amendments to Agenda: Presentations: 1. Swearing-in of Sergeant—Andrew Jeleniewski 2. Certificate of Appreciation from the Alliance Against Intoxicated Motorists—Officer Ryan Goldsmith 3. Knights of Columbus Recreation Scholarship Public Hearings: 1. REC Center Purchase Citizen Comments: Consent Agenda: 1. CC 2012-50 Bills for Payment - $1,095,200.46 2. CC 2012-51 Treasurer's Report for June 2012 3. EDC 2012-28 Ordinance Extending the New Residential Construction Incentive Program by Amending Ordinance Number 2012-03 (B.U.I.L.D. Program)—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 4. EDC 2012-29 Resolution Adopting the Blackberry Creek Watershed Action Plan—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 5. PS 2012-15 Resolution Adopting the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 6. PW 2012-41 Game Farm Road/Somonauk Street Project—Jay Heap Appraiser Contract & MFT Appropriation Resolution—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 7. CC 2012-48 A Resolution Providing for the Submission to the Electors a Referendum of Whether the City Should Become a Home Rule Municipality—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute City Council Meeting July 24, 2012 Page 2 Minutes for Approval: 1. CC 2012-52 Minutes of the City Council June 26, 2012 Mayor's Report: 1. CC 2012-53 Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Illinois FOP Labor Council Representing Yorkville Patrol Officers and the United City of Yorkville 2. CC 2012-54 Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Illinois FOP Labor Council Representing Yorkville Sergeants and the United City of Yorkville Public Works Committee Report: Economic Development Committee Report: Public Safety Committee Report: 1. PS 2012-16 Lightning Detectors for City Parks Administration Committee Report: 1. ADM 2012-32 Resolution Approving a Contract for Garbage, Refuse, Recycling and Yard Waste Collection Services with Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC Park Board: 1. CC 2012-55 Park Board Recommendation on REC Center and Referendum Questions Plan Commission: 1. PC 2012-03 Ordinance Approving Amendments to the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance Providing for Indoor Shooting Ranges as Special Uses and for the Manufacturing of Firearms and Ammunition as a Permitted Use Zoning Board of Appeals: City Council Report: 1. CC 2012-56 November Referendum Questions a. Resolution Providing for the Submission to the Electors a Referendum of Whether the City Should Issue General Obligation Bonds for the Purpose of Constructing a Recreation Facility b. Resolution Providing for the Submission to the Electors a Non-Binding Referendum of Whether the City Should Buy the Rec Center City Clerk's Report: City Treasurer's Report: Community and Liaison Report: Staff Report: Additional Business: City Council Meeting July 24, 2012 Page 3 Executive Session: 1. For collective negotiating matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees. 2. For litigation, when an action against, affecting, or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting. Adjournment: COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES .ADMINISTRATION: August 14, 2012—7.00 p.m.—City Hall Council Chambers. ---- — ----— -------------------------------------- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Spears Finance Library Vice-Chairman: Alderman Gilson Administration Committee: Alderman Colosimo Committee: Alderman Munns ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: August 14,2012-7-00_p_. =City Hall Council Chambers ___ — ----------------------------------------------- --------- ------ -- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Munns Community Development Plan Commission Vice-Chairman: Alderman Funkhouser Building Safety and Zoning Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp. Committee: Alderman Milschewski Kendall Co. Plan Commission Committee: Alderman Teeling ;PUBLIC SAFETY: August 14, 2012—7:00 p.m.—City Hall Council Chambers; Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Colosimo Police Human Resource Comm. Vice-Chairman: Alderman Kot School District Committee: Alderman Spears Committee: Alderman Funkhouser PUBLIC WORKS: August 14, 2012-7.00 m.—City Hall Council Chambers!, _-- ---_ ------------ ---------- ----------------------------- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Gilson Public Works Park Board Vice-Chairman: Alderman Milschewski Engineering YBSD Committee: Alderman Kot Parks and Recreation Committee: Alderman Teeling UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, July 24, 2012 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENTATIONS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Swearing-in of Sergeant—Andrew Jeleniewski 2. Certificate of Appreciation from the Alliance Against Intoxicated Motorists—Officer Ryan Goldsmith 3. Knights of Columbus Recreation Scholarship ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC HEARINGS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. REC Center Purchase ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONSENT AGENDA: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2012-50 Bills for Payment- $$1,095,200.46 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CC 2012-51 Treasurer's Report for June 2012 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2012-28 Ordinance Extending the B.U.I.L.D. Program ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2012-29 Resolution Adopting the Blackberry Creek Watershed Action Plan ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. PS 2012-15 Resolution Adopting the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. PW 2012-41 Game Farm Road/Somonauk Street Project—Jay Heap Appraiser Contract &MFT Appropriation Resolution ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. CC 2012-48 A Resolution Providing for the Submission to the Electors a Referendum of Whether the City Should Become a Home Rule Municipality ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2012-52 Minutes of the City Council—June 26, 2012 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR'S REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2012-53 Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Illinois FOP Labor Council Representing Yorkville Patrol Officers and the United City of Yorkville ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CC 2012-54 Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Illinois FOP Labor Council Representing Yorkville Sergeants and the United City of Yorkville ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. PS 2012-16 Lightning Detectors for City Parks ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADM 2012-32 Resolution Approving a Contract for Garbage, Refuse, Recycling and Yard Waste Collection Services with Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARK BOARD: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2012-55 Park Board Recommendation on REC Center and Referendum Questions ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLAN COMMISSION: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- l. PC 2012-03 Ordinance Amending Zoning Ordinance regarding Indoor Shooting Galleries/Ranges ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY COUNCIL REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2012-56 November Referendum Questions a. New Facility Construction—Binding Referendum ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes b. REC Center Purchase—Non-binding Referendum ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPORTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CfTy Reviewed By: X06 Legal Agenda Item Number Finance Public Hearing EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 : Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ Police ALE � Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation 0 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: REC Center Purchase Meeting and Date: City Council—July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Second of three public hearings related to the potential purchase of the REC Center. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 6/26/12 Action Taken: Public Hearing#1 Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/A Council Action Requested: Discussion/public hearing Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Please refer to the June 26, 2012 City Council packet(Public Hearing item) for additional information. 0 CITY Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number d Legal ❑ `1 06 Legal CA#1 ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number 0 —� Human Resources ❑ �� Community Development ❑ K-44 Police ❑ CC 2012-50 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Bill Payments - $1,095,200.46 Meeting and Date: City Council -July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Approval of bill payments. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Amy Simmons Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YC;RKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 09:10:13 CHECK REGISTER FY 2012 PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513582 AACVB AURORA AREA CONVENTION 043012-ALL 06/19/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-ALL SEASON 01-640-54-00-5481 17.33 02 APRIL 2012 HOTEL TAX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 17.33 * CHECK TOTAL: 17.33 513583 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 50795 04/20/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-GRANDE RESERVE 01-640-54-00-5465 944.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 944.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 944.50 513584 ILTOLL ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY G12419490 04/05/12 01 POLICE-JAN. 2012 - MARCH 2012 01-210-54-00-5415 112.07 02 TOLLS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 112.07 CHECK TOTAL: 112.07 513585 YORKACE YORKVILLE ACE & RADIO SHACK 142596 03/01/12 01 STREETS-CHAIN LOOP 01-410-56-00-5640 41.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 41.98 142676 03/08/12 01 STREETS-NUTS 01-410-56-00-5620 5.45 INVOICE TOTAL: 5.45 142828 03/19/12 01 STREETS-PIPE COUPLING, GLASS 01-410-56-00-5620 18.75 02 SCRAPER, ELBOW, NIPPLE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 18.75 142833 03/19/12 01 STREETS-BOLTS, NUTS 01-410-56-00-5620 7.48 INVOICE TOTAL: 7.48 -1- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 09:10:13 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------------- --------------------------------------- 513585 YORKACE YORKVILLE ACE & RADIO SHACK 142879 03/22/12 01 STREETS-CARPET 01-410-56-00-5620 10.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 10.99 * 142937 03/26/12 01 STREETS-COUPLING 01-410-56-00-5656 12.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 12.98 * 142947 03/27/12 01 STREETS-TOILET REPAIR PARTS 01-410-56-00-5656 27.96 INVOICE TOTAL: CHECK TOTAL: 125.59 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 1,199.49 -2- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER FY 2013 PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513586 AA000003 DANIEL V. TRANSIER 063012 06/30/12 01 POLICE-06/06/12 & 06/13/12 01-210-54-00-5467 300.00 02 ADMIN HEARINGS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 CHECK TOTAL: 300.00 513587 AACVB AURORA AREA CONVENTION 053112-ALL 06/19/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-ALL SEASONS MAY 01-640-54-00-5481 17.80 02 2012 HOTEL TAX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 17.80 053112-HAMPTON 06/19/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-MAY 2012 01-640-54-00-5481 2,950.79 02 HAMPTON INN MOTEL TAX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 2,950.79 053112-SUPER 06/19/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-MAY 2012 SUPER 01-640-54-00-5481 1,210.32 02 8 MOTEL TAX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,210.32 CHECK TOTAL: 4,178.91 513588 ACCURINT LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT. 1249304-20120630 06/30/12 01 POLICE-JUNE SEARCHES 01-210-54-00-5462 50.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 CHECK TOTAL: 50.00 513589 ADVAAUTO ADVANCED AUTOMATION & CONTROLS 12-1653 05/31/12 01 WATER OP-WELL TOWER BACKUP 51-510-54-00-5445 782.77 02 SYSTEM TROUBLESHOOTING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 782.77 CHECK TOTAL: 782.77 -3- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------ 513590 ALFORDR RICHARD ALFORD, PH.D. 062912 06/29/12 01 POLICE-1 POST-OFFER PSYCH 01-210-54-00-5411 300.00 02 FTNESS FOR DUTY EVALUATION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 * 070212 07/02/12 01 POLICE-POST-OFFER PSYCH 01-210-54-00-5411 300.00 02 FITNESS FOR DUTY EVALUATION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 600.00 513591 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 610-7591798 06/19/12 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 19.84 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 19.84 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 19.84 INVOICE TOTAL: 59.52 * 610-7601058 06/26/12 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 26.33 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 26.33 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 26.33 INVOICE TOTAL: 78.99 * 610-7610565 07/03/12 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 20.02 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 20.02 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 20.03 INVOICE TOTAL: 60.07 * CHECK TOTAL: 198.58 513592 ATT AT&T 6305533436-0612 06/25/12 01 POLICE-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5440 44.16 INVOICE TOTAL: 6305536805-0612 06/25/12 01 WATER OP-MONTHLY CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5440 96-72 INVOICE TOTAL: 96.72 CHECK TOTAL: 140.88 -4- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/1 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------------------ 513593 ATTINTER AT&T INTERNET SERVICES 842804266-060912 06/09/12 01 ADMIN-T.1 SERVICE 01-110-54-00-5440, 753.32 INVOICE TOTAL: 753.32 CHECK TOTAL: 753.32 513594 ATTLONG AT&T LONG DISTANCE 82893213-0612 07/01/12 01 ADMIN-JUNE LONG DISTANCE 01-110-54-00-5440 0.10 02 POLICE-JUNE LONG DISTANCE 01-210-54-00-5440 64.12 03 WATER OP-JUNE LONG DISTANCE 51-510-54-00-5440 56.58 INVOICE TOTAL: 120.80 CHECK TOTAL: 120.80 513595 AUTOSP AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES, INC. 18540 06/28/12 01 SEWER OP-FRONT END ALIGNMENT 52-520-56-00-5640 84.75 INVOICE TOTAL: 84.75 ' CHECK TOTAL: 84.75 513596 BANCAMER BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 012141765-C 06/22/12 01 FINANCE-JULY COPIER LEASE 01-120-54-00-5485 143.00 02 ADMIN-JULY COPIER LEASE 01-110-54-00-5485 143.00 03 COMM/DEV-JULY COPIER LEASE 01-220-54-00-5485 273.00 04 POLICE-JULY COPIER LEASES 01-210-54-00-5485 277.00 05 WATER OP-JULY COPIER LEASE 51-510-54-00-5485 33.00 06 SEWER OP-JULY COPIER LEASE 52-520-54-00-5485 33.00 07 STREETS-JULY COPIER LEASE 01-410-54-00-5485 33.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 935.00 CHECK TOTAL: 935.00 513597 BATTERYS BATTERY SERVICE CORPORATION -5- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ----------------------------------------------------------- 513597 BATTERYS BATTERY SERVICE CORPORATION 222755 06/12/12 01 STREETS-BATTERY 01-410-54-00-5495 37.62 INVOICE TOTAL: 37.62 CHECK TOTAL: 37.62 513598 BENNETTG BENNETT, GARY L. 070612 07/06/12 01 STREETS-6 MONTHS OF BURNING 01-410-54-00-5462 600.00 02 BRUSH ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 600.00 CHECK TOTAL: 600.00 513599 BRENNTAG BRENNTAG MID-SOUTH, INC. BMS242867 06/20/12 01 WATER OP-CHEMICALS INVOICE 1-510-56-00-5638 1,652.50 BMS929417 06/21/12 01 WATER OP-DRUM RETURN CREDIT 51-510-56-00-5638 -1, 300.00 INVOICE TOTAL: -1,300.00 CHECK TOTAL: 352.50 513600 BUILDERS BUILDERS ASPHALT LLC 6922 06/26/12 01 MET-RECYCLED SURFACE 15-155-56-00-5634 1,216.80 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,216.80 6939 06/27/12 01 MFT-RECYCLED SURFACE 15-155-56-00-5634 1,683.84 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,683.84 CHECK TOTAL: 2,900.64 513601 CAMBRIA CAMBRIA SALES COMPANY INC. -6- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION 513601 CAMBRIA CAMBRIA SALES COMPANY INC. 32559 06/18/12 01 SEWER OP-PAPER TOWEL 52-520-56-00-5620 55.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 55.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 55.50 513602 CARDIS CARROLL DISTRIBUTING 179293 06/13/12 01 LAND CASH-WOOD STAKES 72-720-60-00-6036 72.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 72.60 * 180211 06/13/12 01 STREETS-MG-KRETE 01-410-54-00-5454 110.26 INVOICE TOTAL: 110.26 * 180419 06/15/12 01 LAND CASH-WOOD STAKES 72-720-60-00-6036 54.45 INVOICE TOTAL: 54.45 * CHECK TOTAL: 237.31 513603 CARGILL CARGILL, INC 2900593488 06/08/12 01 WATER OP-BULK CORSE ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,763.81 INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 763.81 2900603809 06/15/12 01 WATER OP-BULK COURSE ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2, 786.56 INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 786.56 2900611887 06/21/12 01 WATER OP-BULK COURSE ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,746.16 INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 746.16 2900620403 06/27/12 01 WATER OP-COURSE BULK ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2, 775.86 INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 775.86 2900622517 06/28/12 01 WATER OP-COURSE BULK ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,927.06 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,927.06 CHECK TOTAL: 13,999.45 -7- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW_ CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK A VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION --------------------------------------------------- 513604 CARSTAR CARSTAR 083B6B3F-2 06/15/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-ADDITIONAL 01-640-56-00-5625 802.30 02 REPAIR TO SQUAD DAMAGED IN ** COMMENT ** 03 05/07/12 ACCIDENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 802.30 CHECK TOTAL: 802.30 513605 CDWG CDW GOVERNMENT INC. M035152 06/19/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-WINDOWS & 01-640-54-00-5450 691.34 02 ACROBAT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 691.34 * M228844 06/22/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-YPD VIDEO 01-640-54-00-5450 1,265.00 02 SERVER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,265.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 1,956.34 513606 CENTRALL CENTRAL LIMESTONE COMPANY, INC 15842 07/01/12 01 LAND CASH-GRAVEL 72-720-60-00-6036 292.75 INVOICE TOTAL: 292.75 * 16217 06/30/12 01 LAND CASH-GRAVEL 72-720-60-00-6036 2, 534.05 INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 534.05 CHECK TOTAL: 2,826.80 513607 CHEMICAL CHEMICAL PUMP SALES & SERVICE 71986 06/18/12 01 WATER OP-REPAIR WEBTROL 51-510-56-00-5640 634.75 02 BOOSTER PUMP MOTOR ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 634.75 CHECK TOTAL: 634.75 -8- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ---------------------------------------------------------------- 513608 COLLEPRO COLLECTION PROFESSIONALS INC. 258000-J-062912 06/29/12 01 POLICE-COMMISSION ON 01-210-54-00-5467 80.00 02 COLLECTIONS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 80.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 80.00 513609 COMCAST COMCAST CABLE 062612 06/26/12 01 POLICE-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-210-56-00-5620 4.17 INVOICE TOTAL: 4.17 * CHECK TOTAL: 4.17 513610 COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 0185079109-0612 06/29/12 01 WATER OP-420 FAIRHAVEN 51-510-54-00-5480 103.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 103.99 * 0435113116-0612 07/03/12 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 61.80 INVOICE TOTAL: 61.80 0903040077-0612 06/28/12 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 2,225.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,225.10 0908014004-0612 07/02/12 01 WATER OP-WELLS 51-510-54-00-5480 63.77 INVOICE TOTAL: 63.77 0966038077-0612 06/28/12 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 44.64 INVOICE TOTAL: 44.64 1183088101-0612 06/27/12 01 SEWER OP-LIFT STATION 52-520-54-00-5480 85.83 INVOICE TOTAL: 85.83 1407125045-0612 07/02/12 01 SEWER OP-FOXHILL 7 LIFT 52-520-54-00-5480 66.41 INVOICE TOTAL: 66.41 -9- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------- 513610 COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 2019099044-0612 07/06/12 01 WATER OP-WELLS 51-510-54-00-5480 38.06 INVOICE TOTAL: 38.06 * 2668047007-0612 06/27/12 01 SEWER OP-1908 RAINTREE RD INVOICE 2-520-54-00-5480 127.53 2961017043-0612 06/29/12 01 SEWER OP-LIFT STATION 52-520-54-00-5480 100.24 INVOICE TOTAL:4085080033-0612 07/02/12 01 WATER OP-1991 CANNONBALL TRAIL 51-510-54-00-5480 118.84 INVOICE TOTAL:4329092026-0612 06/20/12 01 WATER OP-LIGHTS 51-510-54-00-5480 1,020.36 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,020.36 * 4449087016-0612 07/06/12 01 SEWER OP-LIFT STATIONS INVOICE 2-520-54-00-5480 596.59 4475093053-0612 06/28/12 01 WATER OP-610 TOWER LANE 51-510-54-00-5480 144.53 INVOICE TOTAL: 6963019021-0612 06/14/12 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 21.52 INVOICE TOTAL: 21.52 * 8344010026-0612 06/21/12 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 209.26 INVOICE TOTAL: 209.26 * CHECK TOTAL: 5,028.47 513611 DAVEAUTO DAVID L CHELSEN 19355 06/13/12 01 POLICE-TIRE MOUNT & BALANCE 01-210-54-00-5495 69.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 19390 06/21/12 01 POLICE-SQUAD REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 75.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 75.00 * -10- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 513611 DAVEAUTO DAVID L CHELSEN 19414 06/27/12 01 POLICE-MOUNT & BALANCE TIRES 01-210-54-00-5495 76.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 76.00 * 19416 06/28/12 01 POLICE-BELTS 01-210-54-00-5495 172.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 172.00 * 19446 07/06/12 01 POLICE-SQUAD REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 687.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 687.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 1,079.00 513612 DBCOMM DARYL BOWLES 070212 07/02/12 01 WATER OP-SERVICE CALL 51-510-54-00-5462 120.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 120.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 120.00 513613 DEPO DEPO COURT REPORTING SVC, INC 15486 06/20/12 01 POLICE-MAY 16TH ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 175.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 * 15487 06/20/12 01 POLICE-MAY 23 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 175.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 * 15488 06/20/12 01 POLICE-MAY 30TH ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 175.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 15489 06/20/12 01 POLICE-JUNE 6 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 175.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 15490 06/20/12 01 ADMIN JUNE 13 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 175.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 -11- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION --------------------------------------------------- 513613 DEPO DEPO COURT REPORTING SVC, INC 15491 06/20/12 01 ADMIN-PLAN COMMISSION PUBLIC 01-110-54-00-5462 286.50 02 HEARING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 286.50 * 15495 06/21/12 01 POLICE-APRIL 20 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 175.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 * 15509 07/03/12 01 POLICE-JUNE 27 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 175.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 15510 07/03/12 01 POLICE-JULY 2 ADMIN HEARING O1-210-54-00-5467 175.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 CHECK TOTAL: 1,686.50 513614 DIGITAL DIGITAL SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES 21057 06/29/12 01 POLICE-NEW BACK OFFICE INSTALL 01-210-56-00-5635 2, 499.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 499.00 CHECK TOTAL: 2,499.00 513615 DUTEK DU-TEK, INC. 755044 06/21/12 01 SEWER OP-HOSE ASSEMBLY 52-520-56-00-5640 110.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 110.00 755046 06/21/12 01 SEWER OP-HOSE REPAIR 52-520-56-00-5640 25.00 INVOICE TOTAL: CHECK TOTAL: 135.00 513616 EJEQUIP EJ EQUIPMENT 0050781 06/07/12 01 SEWER OP-MANHOLE TUBE HOLDER, 52-520-56-00-5630 198.58 -12- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513616 EJEQUIP EJ EQUIPMENT 0050781 06/07/12 02 TIGER TAILS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 198.58 * 0050964 06/19/12 01 SEWER OP-X-TEND-A-CLAW 52-520-56-00-5630 400.25 INVOICE TOTAL: 400.25 * CHECK TOTAL: 598.83 513617 ENCAP ENCAP, INC. 23403 06/18/12 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-FOY.HILL UNIT 90-014-14-00-1111 682.80 02 7 LOC ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 682.80 CHECK TOTAL: 682.80 513618 EXELON EXELON ENERGY 100441500090 07/04/12 01 SEWER OP-WELLS 52-520-54-00-5480 2,597.71 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,597.71 100441900090 06/30/12 01 SEWER OP-WELLS 52-520-54-00-5480 4,450.93 INVOICE TOTAL: 4,450.93 100587500080 07/03/12 01 WATER OP-WELLS 51-510-54-00-5480 3,035.71 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,035.71 200306900260 07/02/12 01 WATER OP-LIGHTS 51-510-54-00-5480 129.24 INVOICE TOTAL: 129.24 200307000220 06/22/12 01 WATER OP-LIGHTS 51-510-54-00-5480 2,930.05 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,930.05 CHECK TOTAL: 13,143.64 -13- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------ ---------------------------------------------- 513619 EYEMED FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INS. 070112 07/01/12 01 ADMIN-JULY VISION INSURANCE 01-110-52-00-5224 44.42 02 ADMIN-ELECTED OFFICIALS JULY 01-110-52-00-5238 85.53 03 VISION INSURANCE ** COMMENT ** 04 FINANCE-JULY VISION INSUIRANCE 01-120-52-00-5224 26.98 05 COMM/DEV-JULY VISION INSURANCE 01-210-52-00-5224 26.98 06 POLICE-JULY VISION INSURANCE 01-21'0-52-00-5224 292.03 07 STREETS-JULY VISION INSURANCE 01-410-52-00-5224 58.55 08 ADMIN SERVICES-RETIREES JULY 01-640-52-00-5242 48.19 09 VISION INSURANCE ** COMMENT ** 10 PARKS-JULY VISION INSURANCE 79-790-52-00-5224 83.65 11 RECREATION-JULY VISION 79-795-52-00-5224 29.65 12 INSURANCE ** COMMENT ** 13 WATER OP-JULY VISION INSURANCE 51-510-52-00-5224 58.01 14 SEWER OP-JULY VISION INSURANCE 52-520-52-00-5224 35.98 15 LIBRARY-JULY VISION INSURNANCE 82-820-52-00-5224 53.60 INVOICE TOTAL: CHECK TOTAL: 838.57 513620 FARREN FARREN HEATING & COOLING 7673 07/01/12 01 STREETS-REPLACED THERMOSTAT 01-410-56-00-5656 216.18 02 AT CITY HALL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 216.18 * CHECK TOTAL: 216.18 513621 FIRST FIRST PLACE RENTAL 06/20/12 01 STREETS-CONCRETE SAW 01-410-54-00-5485 215.29 225418-1 215.29 * INVOICE TOTAL: CHECK TOTAL: 215.29 513622 FIRSTNON FIRST NONPROFIT UNEMPLOYEMENT -14- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ------------------------------------------------------------ 513622 FIRSTNON FIRST NONPROFIT UNEMPLOYEMENT 070112 07/01/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-3RD QUARTER 01-640-52-00-5230 3,846.07 02 UNEMPLOYMENT INS. FOR ADMIN ** COMMENT ** 03 PARK/REC AND REC CENTER ** COMMENT ** 04 LIBRARY-3RD QUARTER 82-820-52-00-5230 349.64 05 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ** COMMENT ** 06 WATER OP-3RD QUARTER 51-510-52-00-5230 454.54 07 UNEMLOYMENT INSURANCE ** COMMENT ** 08 SEWER OP-3RD QUARTER 52-520-52-00-5230 244.75 09 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 4, 895.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 4,895.00 513623 FLATSOS RAQUEL HERRERA 062712 06/27/12 01 SEWER OP-TIRES 52-520-54-00-5495 300.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 * 062912 06/29/12 01 STREETS-TIRE REPAIR & DISPOSAL 01-410-54-00-5495 25.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 25.00 CHECK TOTAL: 325.00 513624 FRECOSYS FOX RIVER ECOSYSTEM 12/13 DUES 07/16/12 01 ADMIN-ANNUAL DUES MEMBERSHIP 01-110-54-00-5460 100.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 100.00 CHECK TOTAL: 100.00 513625 FREDRICR ROB FREDRICKSON 070112 07/01/12 01 FINANCE-JUNE 2012 MOBILE EMAIL 01-120-54-00-5440 45.00 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 -15- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------ 513626 FULTON FULTON TECHNOLOGIES U-20120631 06/25/12 01 PD -CAPITAL-INSTALLATION FOR 20-200-60-00-6060 52, 500.00 02 3 WEATHER WARNING SIRENS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 52,500.00 CHECK TOTAL: 52,500.00 513627 GALLS GALL'S INC. 512271370 06/27/12 01 POLICE-REPLACED GLASSES THAT 01-210-56-00-5600 80.98 02 WERE DAMAGES IN THE LINE OF ** COMMENT •* 03 DUTY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 80.98 CHECK TOTAL: 80.98 513628 GARDKOCH GARDINER KOCH & WEISBERG H-1961C-89801 06/12/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-KENDALL MARKET 01-640-54-00-5461 240.50 02 PLACE MATTERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 240.50 H-1974C-84384 06/06/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-IEPA MATTERS 01-640-54-00-5461 37.00 H-2013C-84311 06/06/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-HAMMAN FEES 01-640-54-00-5461 3,922.00 02 MATTERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 3, 922.00 H-2364C-84263 06/06/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-KIMBALL HILL 01-640-54-0'0-5461 92.50 02 MATTERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 92.50 CHECK TOTAL: 4,292.00 513629 GODWINL LISA R. GODWIN -16- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/29/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION --------------------------------------------------------------- 513629 GODWINL LISA R. GODWIN 070912 07/15/12 01 ADMIN-JULY 9TH AD HOC MEETING 01-110-54-00-5462 87.64 02 MINUTES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 87.64 CHECK TOTAL: 87.64 513630 GOLINSKI GARY GOLINSKI 070112 07/01/12 01 ADMIN-JUNE 2012 MOBILE EMAIL 01-110-54-00-5440 45.00 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 513631 HARTROB HART, ROBBIE 061912 06/19/12 01 POLICE-MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 01-210-54-00-5415 10.82 INVOICE TOTAL: 10.82 CHECK TOTAL: 10.82 513632 HDSUPPLY HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD. 4870066 06/26/12 01 WATER OP-8 100CF METERS 51-510-56-00-5664 1,348.38 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,348.38 CHECK TOTAL: 1,346.38 513633 HOMEDEPO HOME DEPOT 1143943 05/08/12 01 STREETS-FILTERS O1-410-56-00-5640 27.13 INVOICE TOTAL: 27.13 CHECK TOTAL: 27.13 -17- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------- 513634 ILEPA ILLINOIS E.P.A. FISCAL SERVICE 062012 06/20/12 01 COMM/DEV-ANNUAL PERMIT FEES 01-220-54-00-5462 1, 000.00 02 RENEWAL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 000.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 1, 000.00 513635 ILLUMBER IL VALLEY URBAN LUMBERJACKS 12274 06/28/12 01 STREETS-6 TREE & STUMP REMOVAL 01-410-54-00-5458 3,325.75 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,325.75 CHECK TOTAL: 3,325.75 513636 ILPD4778 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE 062612 06/26/12 01 ADMIN LIQUOR BACKGROUND CHECKS 01-110-54-00-5462 63.00 INVOICE TOTAL: CHECK TOTAL: 63.00 513637 ILPD4811 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE 062612C 06/26/12 01 COMM/DEV-BACKGROUND CHECK 01-220-54-00-5462 31.50 02 ADMIN-LIQUOR BACKGROUND CHECK 01-110-54-00-5462 31.50 03 POLICE-BACKGROUND CHECKS 01-210-54-00-5411 220.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 283.50 CHECK TOTAL: 283.50 513638 IPRF ILLINOIS PUBLIC RISK FUND 5390 07/02/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-ADMIN, PARK/REC 01-640-52-00-5231. 7,406.00 02 & REC CENTER AUGUST WORKERS ** COMMENT ** 03 COMP. INSURANCE ** COMMENT ** -78- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ---------------------------------------------------------- 513638 IPRF ILLINOIS PUBLIC RISK FUND 5390 07/02/12 04 WATER OP-AUGUST WORKERS COMP. 51-510-52-00-5231 724.00 O5 INSURANCE . ** COMMENT ** 06 SEWER OP-AUGUST WORKERS COMP 52-520-52-00-5231 481.00 07 INSURANCE ** COMMENT ** 08 LIBRARY-AUGUST WORKERS COMP 82-820-52-00-5231 840.00 09 INSURANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 9, 451.00 CHECK TOTAL: 9,451.00 513639 ITRON ITRON 248339 06/11/12 01 WATER OP-METER READING 51-510-56-00-5664 456.23 INVOICE TOTAL: 456.23 CHECK TOTAL: 456.23 513640 JOHNSOIL JOHNSON OIL COMPANY IL NP34773978 07/01/12 01 POLICE-GASOLINE 01-210-56-00-5695 2,512.22 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,512.22 * CHECK TOTAL: 2,512.22 513641 JUSTSAFE JUST SAFETY, LTD 17155 06/27/12 01 SEWER OP-FIRST AID SUPPLIES 52-520-56-00-5620 53.45 INVOICE TOTAL: 53.45 * CHECK TOTAL: 53.45 513642 KAMP KAMP / SYNERGY, LLC. 3715 06/25/12 01 WATER OP-REPLACED ANTENNA ON 51-510-54-00-5495 1,097.30 • -19- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 T CHECK REGISTER TIME: 09:25:05 PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ---- ----------------------------------------------- 513642 KAMP KAMP / SYNERGY, LLC. 3715 06/25/12 02 RAINTREE TOWER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,097.30 CHECK TOTAL: 1,097.30 513643 KCACP KENDALL COUNTY ASSOCIATION 858341 06/13/12 01 POLICE-MONTHLY LUNCHEON 01-210-54-00-*415 15.00 02 MEETING FOR 1 PERSON ** COMMENT INVOICE TOTAL: 15.00 CHECK TOTAL: 15.00 513644 KCCONC KENDALL COUNTY CONCRETE 29676 06/19/12 01 LAND CASH-PARKING LOT CURB AT 72-720-60-00-6036 481.50 02 RAINTREE PARK B ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 481.50 29731 06/28/12 01 LAND CASH-CONCRETE FOR CURB AT 72-720-60-00-6036 588.50 02 RAINTREE PARK B ** COMMENT INVOICE TOTAL: 588.50 CHECK TOTAL: 1,070.00 513645 KCRECORD KENDALL COUNTY RECORD 9354 06/21/12 01 WATER OP-EMPLOYEMENT AD 51-510-54-00-5426 86.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 06/30/12 01 WATER OP-EMPLOYMENT AD 51-510-54-00-5426 86.10 9598 INVOICE TOTAL: 86.10 * 9724 06/29/12 01 WATER OP-WATER QUALITY REPORTS 51-510-54-00-5426 944.65 INVOICE TOTAL: CHECK TOTAL: 1, 116.85 -20- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------ 513646 KCSHERIF KENDALL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFIC 062612 06/26/12 01 ADMIN-FTA REIMBURSEMENT 01-000-24-00-2412 70.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 70.00 * 062612-2 06/26/12 01 ADMIN-FTA REIMURSEMENT 01-000-24-00-2412 140.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 140.00 062912 06/29/12 01 ADMIN-FTA REIMBURSEMENT 01-000-24-00-2412 70.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 062912-2 06/29/12 01 ADMIN-FTA REIMBURSEMENT 01-000-24-00-2412 70.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 70.00 * 12-0378 07/10/12 01 PD CAPITAL-PORTION OF SEIZED 20-200-54-00-5462 442.75 02 VEHICLE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 442.75 * CHECK TOTAL: 792.75 513647 KCSTATTO KENDALL COUNTY STATES ATTORNEY 12-0378 07/10/12 01 PD CAPITAL-PORTION OF SEIZED 20-200-54-00-5462 3,099.25 02 VEHICLE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 3,099.25 * CHECK TOTAL: 3,099.25 513648 KENPRINT ANNETTE M. POWELL 18991 06/22/12 01 ADMIN 500 BUSINESS CARDS 01-110-56-00-5610 29.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 29.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 29.00 513649 KONICAMI KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS -21- SATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20 LIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER ?RG ID: AP215000-WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ------------------------------------------------------------ 513649 KONICAMI KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 221486566 06/29/12 01 POLICE-COPIER CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5430 25.05 INVOICE TOTAL: 221486567 06/29/12 01 ADMIN-COLOR COPIER CHARGES 01-110-54-00-5430 388.80 02 ADMIN-B/W COPIER CHARGES 01-110-54-00-5430 271.49 INVOICE TOTAL: 660.29 * 221486599 06/29/12 01 WATER OP-COPIER CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5430 9.77 INVOICE TOTAL: 9.77 * 221486600 06/29/12 01 POLICE-COPIER CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5430 53.49 INVOICE TOTAL: 53.49 * 221486601 06/29/12 01 COMM/DEV-COLOR COPIER CHARGES 01-220-54-00-5430 316.44 02 COMM/DEV-B/W COPIER CHARGES 01-220-54-00-5430 68.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 384.94 CHECK TOTAL: 1,133.54 513650 LANEMUCH LANER, MUCHIN, DOMBROW, BECKER 399749 06/01/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-LOCAL 150 01-640-54-00-5463 450.00 02 LEGAL MATTERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 450.00 CHECK TOTAL: 450.00 513651 MARINEBI ARCH CHEMICALS, INC 51838034 06/25/12 01 SUNFLOWER SSA-ALGAE TREATMENT 12-112-54-00-5495 812.00 02 FOR THREE PONDS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 812.00 CHECK TOTAL: 812.00 -22- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-------- 513652 MCKIRGN RANDY MCKIRGAN 73018 06/27/12 01 STREETS-DIESEL FUEL 01-410-56-00-5695 981.37 02 WATER OP-DIESEL FUEL 51-510-56-00-5695 981.37 03 SEWER OP-DIESEL FUEL 52-520-56-00-5695 981.38 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,944.12 CHECK TOTAL: 2,944.12 513653 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 90053 06/11/12 01 WATER OP-COOLER, ICE PACKS, 51-510-54-00-5429 24.94 02 BOLT SNAP ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 24.94 90548 06/13/12 01 STREETS-WELDERS GLOVE 01-410-56-00-5620 5.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 5.99 90634 06/13/12 01 LAND CASH-RE-BAR TIE WIRE, 72-720-60-00-6036 298.29 02 RE-BAR ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 298.29 91123 06/15/12 01 WATER OP-SCREWS, SEALING 51-510-56-00-5620 4.77 02 COMPOUND ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 4.77 91228 06/15/12 01 LAND CASH-FLOOR SCRAPER, 72-720-60-00-6036 95.96 02 CONCRETE SEALER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 95.96 92074 06/18/12 01 STREETS-30 AMP 2-POLE BREAKER 01-410-56-00-5640 13.63 INVOICE TOTAL: 13.63 92384 06/19/12 01 WATER OP-MOTO TOOL, EPDXY 51-510-56-00-5630 8.64 02 GLUE, SCREWDRIVER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 8.64 -23- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT -------------------------------------------------------------------- 513653 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 92490 06/19/12 01 SEWER OP-BULBS 52-520-56-00-5613 9.96 INVOICE TOTAL: 9.96 * 92505 06/19/12 01 SEWER OP-BULBS 52-520-56-00-5613 35.88 INVOICE TOTAL: 35.88 * 92697 06/20/12 01 STREETS-TARP, SOCKET, RATCHET 01-410-56-00-5630 73.46 02 TIE DOWN ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 73.46 * 92701 06/20/12 01 WATER OP-ELECTRIC DEHUM SOLEUS 51-510-56-00-5640 197.59 02 DUCT TAPE, ELBOWS, PIPE WRAP ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 197.59 * 92737 06/20/12 01 WATER OP-TOG/DECOR PLATE, 51-510-56-00-5640 10.23 02 3-WAY SWITCHES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10.23 * 92796 06/20/12 01 STREETS-TOILET TANK REPAIR KIT 01-410-56-00-5656 7.99 02 FOR BEECHER CENTER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 7.99 * 92811 06/20/12 01 STREETS-PARTS FOR BEECHER 01-410-56-00-5656 11.44 02 CENTER TOILET REPAIR ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 11.44 * 92978 06/21/12 01 STREETS-CHROME TANK LEVER 01-410-56-00-5656 1.58 INVOICE TOTAL: 1.58 * 93045 06/21/12 01 STREETS-PARTS FOR CITY HALL 01-410-56-00-5656 3.69 02 AC DRAINS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 3.69 * 93344 06/22/12 01 WATER OP-WESTBURY HYDRANT 51-510-56-00-5640 9.42 -24- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/29/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513653 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 93344 06/22/12 02 REPAIR PARTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 9.42 95208 06/28/12 01 STREETS-POLE BREAKERS 01-410-56-00-5656 11.18 INVOICE TOTAL: 11.18 95396 06/29/12 01 STREETS-PROGRAMMABLE 01-410-56-00-5656 24.77 02 THERMOSTAT FOR PW OFFICE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 24.77 95549 06/29/12 01 SEWER OP-PUSH BROOMS, LARGE 52-520-56-00-5620 50.70 02 ANGLE BROOMS, STEEL HANDLES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 50.70 96625 07/03/12 01 STREETS-COMPRESSION CRIMPER, 01-410-56-00-5620 67.94 02 COMPRESSION CONCRETE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 67.94 CHECK TOTAL: 968.05 513654 MERLIN DEYCO, INC. 17802 06/18/12 01 POLICE-HEADLAMP BULB 01-210-54-00-5495 18.97 INVOICE TOTAL: 18.97 * 17887 06/22/12 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE 01-210-54-00-5495 33.70 INVOICE TOTAL: 33.70 * 17975 06/27/12 01 POLICE-3K MAINTENANCE PACKAGE 01-210-54-00-5495 29.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 29.95 * 18089 07/05/12 01 POLICE-TIRE PLUG 01-210-54-00-5495 14.14 INVOICE TOTAL: 14.14 18123 07/06/12 01 POLICE-3K MAINTENANCE PACKAGE 01-210-54-00-5495 29.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 29.95 -25- SATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER ?RG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/29/12 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------------------ --------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513654 MERLIN DEYCO, INC. 18175 07/09/12 01 POLICE-MOUNT & BALANCE TIRES 01-210-54-00-5495 22.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 22.50 CHECK TOTAL: 149.21 513655 MESIROW MESIROW INSURANCE SERVICES INC 775449 06/29/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-INSTALLEMENT 9 01-640-52-00-5231 6,658.00 02 OF 10 - AUGUST LIABILITY INS. ** COMMENT ** 03 WATER OP-INSTALLMENT 9 OF 10 51-510-52-00-5231 828.00 04 AUGUST LIABILITY INS. ** COMMENT ** 05• SEWER OP-INSTALLMENT 9 OF 10 52-520-52-00-5231 551.00 06 AUGUST LIABILITY INS. ** COMMENT ** 07 ADMIN SERVICES-INSTALLMENT 9 01-640-52-00-5231 1,381.00 08 OF 10 PARK/REC AUGUST ** COMMENT ** 09 LIABILITY INS. ** COMMENT ** 10 ADMIN SERVICES-INSTALLMENT 9 01-640-52-00-5231 434.00 11 OF 10 REC CENTER LIABILITY INS ** COMMENT ** 12 LIBRARY-INSTALLMENT 9 OF 10 82-820-52-00-5231 961.00 13 AUGUST LIABILITY INS. ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10,813.00 CHECK TOTAL: 10,813.00 513656 MESIROW MESIROW INSURANCE SERVICES INC 776108 07/09/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-NEW POLICY 01-640-52-00-5231 416.00 02 #GPPAPF605481800 FOR NEW SQUAD ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 416.00 * 776127 07/09/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-NEW POLICY 01-640-52-00-5231 824.00 02 #GPPAPF605481800 FOR TWO NEW ** COMMENT ** 03 ADDITIONAL SQUADS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 824.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 1,240.00 -26- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------------------- 513657 METROWES METRO WEST COG 1054 06/29/12 01 AOMIN-LEGISLATIVE BBQ FOR ONE 01-110-54-00-5415 27.50 02 PERSON ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 27.50 CHECK TOTAL: 27.50 513658 MIDAM MID AMERICAN WATER 76250A 05/30/12 01 WATER OP-TYPE K COPPER, 51-510-56-00-5640 763.00 02 WATEROUS HYD. EXT., COUPLING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 763.00 CHECK TOTAL: 763.00 513659 MINER MINER ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 245289-062712 07/10/12 01 PD CAPITAL-INSTALLATION OF 20-200-54-00-5495 950.00 02 CAR M-1 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 950.00 245290-062712 06/27/12 01 PD CAPITAL-INSTALLATION OF 20-200-54-00-5495 880.00 02 CAR M-10 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 880.00 245704 06/11/12 01 POLICE-SQUAD REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 237.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 237.50 245705 06/11/12 01 POLICE-911 LIGHT STICK 01-210-54-00-5495 685.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 685.00 245881 06/25/12 01 PD CAPITAL-REMOVE LIGHTS FROM 20-200-54-00-5495 916.86 02 EXPEDITION AND INSTALL IN ** COMMENT ** 03 YUKON ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 916.86 CHECK TOTAL: 3,669.36 -27- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 26 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER DRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 ;HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513660 MJELECT MJ ELECTRICAL SUPPLY, INC. 1128505-01 06/11/12 01 STREETS-BALLAST KIT O1-410-56-00-5640 55.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 55.00 1128524-01 06/12/12 01 STREETS-FUSES, LENSES 01-410-56-00-5640 39.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 39.50 1128524-02 06/15/12 01 STREETS-COBRA LENS 01-410-56-00-5640 294.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 294.00 1128631-00 06/21/12 01 SEWER OP-BULBS 52-520-56-00-5613 51.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 51.95 1128658-00 06/21/12 01 SEWER OP-BULB 52-520-56-00-5613 12.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 12.00 1128661-00 06/21/12 01 SEWER OP-PHOTOCELL 52-520-56-00-5613 11.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 11.50 1128668-01 06/22/12 01 SEWER OP-HPS BULBS 52-520-56-00-5613 170.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 170.00 1128677-00 06/21/12 01 WATER OP-BULB 51-510-56-00-5640 23.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 23.00 1128699-00 06/22/12 01 SEWER OP-PHOTOCELL 52-520-56-00-5613 23.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 23.00 1128773-00 06/25/12 01 SEWER OP-BALLAST 52-520-56-00-5613 150.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 150.00 CHECK TOTAL: 829.95 513661 MUSCO MUSCO CORPORATION 236433 06/18/12 01 LAND CASH-LIGHTING PROJECT FOR 72-720-60-00-6036 1,128.60 -28- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 27 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513661 MUSCO MUSCO CORPORATION 236433 06/18/12 02 RAINTREE PARK TENNIS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 128.60 CHECK TOTAL: 1, 128.60 513662 NEMRT NORTH EAST MULTI-REGIONAL 159101 06/25/12 01 POLICE-ADVANCED INTERVIEWS AND 01-210-54-00-5412 125.00 02 INTERROGATION TRAINING FOR ONE ** COMMENT ** 03 PERSON ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 125.00 159449 06/28/12 01 POLICE-BREATH ALCOHOL TESTING 01-210-54-00-5412 120.00 02 CLASS FOR TWO PEOPLE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 120.00 CHECK TOTAL: 245.00 513663 NESSD NESS, DEBRA 062212 06/22/12 01 ADMIN-REFUND OF ADMIN TOWING 01-000-43-00-4325 500.00 02 FEE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 500.00 CHECK TOTAL: 500.00 513664 NEXTEL NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 837900513-124-CITY 06/21/12 01 COMM/DEV-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-220-54-00-5440 152.85 02 POLICE-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5440 885.10 03 SEWER OP-MONTHLY CHARGES . 52-520-54-00-5440 134.66 04 STREETS-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-410-54-00-5440 171.09 05 WATER OP-MONTHLY CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5440 207.88 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,551.58 CHECK TOTAL: 1,551.58 -29- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 28 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT --------------------------------------------------------------------- 513665 OFFWORK OFFICE WORKS 206687 06/18/12 01 FINANCE-BINDER TABS 01-120-56-00-5610 28.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 28.99 CHECK TOTAL: 28.99 513666 OHERROND RAY O'HERRON COMPANY, INC. 0055341-IN 06/13/12 01 POLICE-NAMEPLATES, HAT BADGE, 01-210-56-00-5600 199.40 02 BELT KEEPERS, CUFF CASE, ** COMMENT ** 03 BUCKLE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 199.40 CHECK TOTAL: 199.40 513667 OLSONB BART OLSON 070112 07/01/12 01 ADMIN-JUNE 2012 MOBILE EMAIL 01-110-54-00-5440 45.00 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 513668 OPENLAND OPENLANDS 061112 06/11/12 01 LAND CASH-LEASE DONATION 72-720-60-00-6032 12,000.00 02 AGREEMENT FEE EXTENSION FOR ** COMMENT ** 03 PERIOD 07/12/12 - 07/11/13 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 12,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 12,000.00 513669 ORRK KATHLEEN FIELD ORR & ASSOC. 13773 07/09/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-GENERAL LEGAL 01-640-54-00-5461 6,992.00 -30- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 29 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 513669 ORRK KATHLEEN FIELD ORR & ASSOC. 13773 07/09/12 02 MATTERS ** COMMENT ** 03 COMM/DEV-WINDETTE RIDGE 01-220-54-00-5466 332.50 04 LITIGATION ** COMMENT ** 05 DEVELOPER ESCROW-ACRR 90-019-19-00-0011 47.50 ,06 AGREEMENT AMENDMENT ** COMMENT ** 07 DEVELOPER ESCROW-BLACKBERRY 90-016-16-00-0011 285.00 O8 WOODS ** COMMENT ** 09 COMM/DEV-BRISTOL BAY CENTEX 01-220-54-00-5466 285.00 10 DOWNTOWN TIF-LEGAL MATTERS 88-880-54-00-5466 446.50 11 ADMIN SERVICES-KENDALL MARKET 01-640-54-00-5461 180.50 12 PLACE ** COMMENT ** 13 ADMIN SERVICES-MEETINGS 01-640-54-00-5461 1,000.00 14 ADMIN SERVICES-WINDETTE RIDGE 01-640-54-00-5461 142.50 15 LITIGATION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 9,711.50 CHECK TOTAL: 9,711.50 513670 PARADISE PARADISE CAR WASH 222392 07/03/12 01 POLICE-JUNE CAR WASHES 01-210-54-00-5495 59.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 59.00 CHECK TOTAL: 59.00 513671 PATTEN PATTEN INDUSTRIES, INC. PM600210423 06/12/12 01 WATER OP-REPAIR GENERATOR AT 51-510-54-00-5445 907.50 02 WELL 8 FACILITY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 907.50 CHECK TOTAL: 907.50 513672 PHILSTOP PHIL'S TOP SOIL, INC. -31- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 30 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/29/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513672 PHILSTOP PHIL'S TOP SOIL, INC. 26919 06/09/12 01 STREETS-DIRT 01-410-54-00-5458 270.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 270.00 CHECK TOTAL: 270.00 513673 PIAZZA AMY SIMMONS 062112 06/21/12 01 FINANCE-IGFOA CASH HANDLING 01-120-54-00-5415 29.20 02 SEMINAR MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 29.20 CHECK TOTAL: 29.20 513674 PITBOW PITNEY BOWES 1970458-JY12 07/13/12 01 FINANCE-04/30/12 - 06/30/12 01-120-54-00-5462 700.00 02 RENTAL CHARGES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 700.00 CHECK TOTAL: 700.00 513675 PITNEYBO PITNEY BOWES INC 302508 07/01/12 01 ADMIN-RED INK CARTRIDGE 01-110-56-00-5610 67.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 67.99 * 352992 06/01/12 01 FINANCE-MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 01-120-54-00-5462 1, 761.00 02 RENEWAL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 761.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 1,828.99 513676 QUILL QUILL CORPORATION 4027759 06/27/12 01 ADMIN-COLOR COPY PAPER, 01-110-56-00-5610 53.98 -32- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 31 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513676 QUILL QUILL CORPORATION 4027759 06/27/12 02 BINDING COVERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 53.98 * 4048023 06/28/12 01 POLICE-4 DRAWER FILING CABINET 01-210-56-00-5610 519.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 519.98 * CHECK TOTAL: 573.96 513677 R0000594 BRIAN BETZWISER 062512-44 06/25/12 01 PW CAPITAL-185 WOLF STREET 21-211-92-00-8050 4,397.35 02 INTEREST PAYMENT #44 ** COMMENT ** 03 PW CAPITAL-185 WOLF STREET 21-211-92-00-8000 2,460.57 04 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 444 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 6, 857.92 * CHECK TOTAL: 6,857.92 513678 R0001051 RICHARD KASTNER 062412 06/29/12 01 ADMIN-BEEC14ER DEPOSIT REFUND 01-000-24-00-2410 50.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 50.00 513679 80001052 CURRENS LANDSCAPING INC. 062612 06/26/12 01 ADMIN-REFUND DUPLICATE PERMIT 01-000-42-00-4210 50.00 02 PAYMENT MADE FOR PERMIT ** COMMENT ** 03 #2012-0251 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 CHECK TOTAL: 50.00 513680 RADARMAN CINDY GRISWOLD -33- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 32 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 513680 RADARMAN CINDY GRISWOLD 1581 06/18/12 01 POLICE-11 RADAR CERTIFICATIONS 01-210-54-00-5495 550.00 02 TUNING FORKS CERTIFICATIONS & ** COMMENT ** 03 WIRE CHECKS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 550.00 * 1589 06/20/12 01 POLICE-CORD FOR RADAR ANTENNA 01-210-54-00-5495 110.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 110.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 660.00 513681 RIVRVIEW RIVERVIEW FORD 107185 06/20/12 01 STREETS-SUPPORT, CALIPER, 01-410-54-00-5495 330.82 02 ROTOR ASSEMBLY, SEAL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 330.82 CHECK TOTAL: 330.82 513682 SAMS SAM'S CLUB 071212 07/12/12 01 FINANCE-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 01-120-54-00-5460 35.00 02 RENEWAL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 35.00 CHECK TOTAL: 35.00 513683 SERVMASC SERVICEMASTER COMM. CLEANING 157484 06/15/12 01 ADMIN-MONTHLY CITY OFFICES 01-110-54-00-5488 1,196.00 02 CLEANING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,196.00 CHECK TOTAL: 1, 196.00 513684 SIRCHIE SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPANY -34- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 33 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513684 SIRCHIE SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPANY 0085710-IN 06/26/12 01 POLICE-DUQUENOIS TEST 01-210-56-00-5620 109.13 INVOICE TOTAL: 109.13 CHECK TOTAL: 109.13 513685 SLEEZERJ SLEEZER, JOHN 070112 07/01/12 01 STREETS-JUNE 2012 MOBILE EMAIL 01-410-54-00-5440 45.00 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 513686 SOEBBINR ROMAN SOEBBING 062012 06/20/12 01 POLICE TRAINING MEAL 01-210-54-00-5415 34.72 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 34.72 CHECK TOTAL: 34.72 513687 SOFTWARE SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE 410993 06/14/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-2 WIRELESS 01-640-54-00-5450 1,645.00 02 ACCESS POINTS, 2 FIREWALLS, ** COMMENT ** 03 WINDOWS BACKUP ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,645.00 410994 06/15/12 03 ADMIN SERVICES-REMOTE - 01-640-54-00-5450 2, 799.00 04 MONITORING CONTRACT FOR ** COMMENT ** 05 SERVER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 799.00 411015 06/26/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-TRAVEL CHARGES 01-640-54-00-5450 75.00 -35- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 34 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT -------- ---------------------------------------------------------- 513687 SOFTWARE SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE 411015 06/26/12 02' FOR 06/04/12, 06/09/12 & ** COMMENT ** 03 06/18/12 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 75.00 * 411019 07/02/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-50 HOUR BLOCK 01-640-54-00-5450 5,999.00 02 OF TIME CONTRACT FOR 07/01/12 ** COMMENT ** 03 TO 03/30/13 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 5,999.00 * 411020 07/05/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-GB NETWORK CARD 01-640-54-00-5450 69.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 69.99 * 411028 07/05/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-TRAVEL CHARGE 01-640-54-00-5450 25.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 25.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 10,612.99 513688 SPEEDWAY SPEEDWAY 1001542438-0712C 07/11/12 01 POLICE-JUNE GASOLINE 01-210-56-00-5695 718.25 02 STREETS-JUNE GASOLINE 01-410-56-00-5695 579.72 03 WATER OP-JUNE GASOLINE 51-510-56-00-5695 579.72 04 SEWER OP-JUNE GASOLINE 52-520-56-00 75695 579.72 O5 COMM/DEV-JUNE GASOLINE 01-220-56-00-5695 129.54 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,586.95 * CHECK TOTAL: 2, 586.95 513689 STREICH STREICHERS I935210 06/11/12 01 POLICE-PANTS 01-210-56-00-5600 49.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 49.99 * I935922 06/13/12 01 POLICE-BADGES 01-210-56-00-5600 204.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 204.95 * -36- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 35 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513689 STREICH STREICHERS I937694 06/20/12 01 POLICE-LED UPGRADE 01-210-56-00-5640 49.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 49.99 * I938665 06/25/12 01 POLICE-BALL VESTS 01-210-56-00-5690 3,025.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,025.00 * I938987 06/26/12 01 POLICE-VISOR LIGHT, VISOR FLIP 01-210-56-00-5640 147.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 147.99 * CHECK TOTAL: 3, 477.92 513690 STRYPES STRYPES PLUS MORE INC. 11561 06/15/12 01 PD CAPITAL-SQUAD BUILD OUT 20-200-54-00-5495 1,280.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,280.00 11581 06/29/12 01 PD CAPITAL-NEW SQUAD BUILDOUT 20-200-54-00-5495 1,160.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,160.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 2,440.00 513691 SUPERIOR SUPERIOR ASPHALT MATERIALS LLC 20120437 06/12/12 01 MFT-COLD PATCH 15-155-56-00-5633 1,647.35 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,647.35 CHECK TOTAL: 1,647.35 513692 TAPCO TAPCO I397574 06/26/12 01 MET-SIGN 15-155-56-00-5619 174.59 INVOICE TOTAL: 174.59 * CHECK TOTAL: 174.59 -37- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 36 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/29/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513693 TARGET TARGET BANK 061812-CITY 06/18/12 01 ADMIN-COFFEE 01-110-56-00-5610 8.54 INVOICE TOTAL: 8.54 * CHECK TOTAL: 8.54 513694 TIGERDIR TIGERDIRECT J04907830101 06/20/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-5 MONITORS 01-640-54-00-5450 805.35 INVOICE TOTAL: 805.35 * J04907830102 06/19/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-COMPUTER 01-640-54-00-5450 3,122.93 02 COMPONENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 3, 122.93 * J05442470101 06/21/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-2 USB DOCKING 01-640-54-00-5450 200.66 02 STATIONS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 200.66* J05442470102 06/22/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-2 LAPTOPS 01-640-54-00-5450 1,299.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,299.98 * CHECK TOTAL: 5,428.92 513695 TLCGROUP THE T.L.C. GROUP, LTD. 27533 06/29/12 01 FOX HILL SSA-JUNE MOWING 11-111-54-00-5495 423.20 02 SUNFLOWER SSA-JUNE MOWING 12-112-54-00-5495 400.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 823.20 * 27539 06/29/12 01 SUNFLOWER SSA-SPRING CLEAN « 12-112-54-00-5495 1,642.00 02 MULCHING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,642.00 * 27540 06/29/12 01 FOX HILL SSA-JUNE SPRING CLEAN 11-111-54-00-5495 915.00 -38- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 37 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513695 TLCGROUP THE T.L.C. GROUP, LTD. 27540 06/29/12 02 REMOVED DEAD TREES, MULCHED ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 915.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 3,380.20 513696 TRAFFIC TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 0000054669 06/27/12 01 STREETS-GREEN LED BALL 01-410-56-00-5640 86.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 86.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 86.00 513697 UPSSTORE THE UPS STORE - #5361 062012 06/20/12 01 ADMIN-2 PKGS TO KFO, 1 PKG. TO 01-110-54-00-5452 113.19 02 ITEP GRANT APP. ** COMMENT ** 03 POLICE-1 PKG. TO QUEST TECH, 1 01-210-54-00-5452 18.29 04 PKG. TO DCFS ** COMMENT ** 05 WATER OP-1 PKG. TO ITRON, 1 51-510-54-00-5452 80.87 06 PKG. TO SPARLING INSTRUMENTS, ** COMMENT ** 07 1 PKG. TO IEPA LABS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 212.35 CHECK TOTAL: 212.35 513698 VISA VISA 062612-CITY 06/26/12 01 FINANCE-REOCURRING WEBSITE 01-120-54-00-5462 25.94 02 UPKEEP CHARGES ** COMMENT ** 03 COMM/DEV-52 WEEK ACCESS TO 01-220-54-00-5462 575.00 04 COUNTY DATA BASES ** COMMENT ** 05 WATER OP-WELL 8 & 9 51-510-56-00-5638 186.57 06 REPLACEMENT SUPPLIES ** COMMENT ** 07 ADMIN-WATER FILTER 01-110-56-00-5610 42.17 -39- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: ' 38 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION --------------------------------------------------------- 513698 VISA VISA 062612-CITY 06/26/12 08 STREETS-FILLER PLATE 01-410-56-00-5620 4.33 09 STREETS-TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR 01-410-56-00-5640 85.66 10 COMM/DEV-AUTO CAD SUBSCRIPTION 01-220-56-00-5635 1, 211.30 11 STREETS-MONTHLY CABLE 01-410-56-00-5620 118.33 12 WATER OP-MONTHLY CABLE 51-510-56-00-5620 118.34 13 SEWER OP-MONTHLY CABLE 52-520-56-00-5620 118.33 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,485.97 CHECK TOTAL: 2,485.97 513699 VISA VISA 062612-PD 06/26/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-NEW KEYBOARD, 01-640-54-00-5450 69.01 02 MOUSE, PRINT SERVER ** COMMENT ** 03 ADMIN-LODGING FOR PENSION 01-000-24-00-2440 608.22 04 BOARD TRAINING ** COMMENT ** O5 POLICE-LODGING, PARKING METER 01-210-54-00-5415 315.72 06 POLICE-GARMIN GPS REPLACEMENT 01-210-56-00-5620 19.48 07 CORD ** COMMENT ** 08 POLICE-REPLACEMENT CAPS FOR 01-210-56-00-5640 102.12 09 SQUAD ** COMMENT ** 10 POLICE-ILEAS 2012 DUES 01-210-54-00-5460 50.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,164.55 CHECK TOTAL: 1,164.55 513700 WALMART WALMART COMMUNITY 062212 06/22/12 01 ADMIN-KLEENEX, PAPER TOWEL 01-110-56-00-5610 28.96 INVOICE TOTAL: 28.96 * CHECK TOTAL: 28.96 513701 WAREHOUS WAREHOUSE DIRECT -40- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 39 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/29/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513701 WAREHOUS WAREHOUSE DIRECT 1581173-0 06/08/12 01 ADMIN-TAPE 01-110-56-00-5610 15.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 15.00 * 1586765-0 06/14/12 01 POLICE-PAPER 01-210-54-00-5430 613.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 613.60 * CHECK TOTAL: 628.60 513702 WATERPRO RI WATERMAN PROPERTIES 062612-32 06/26/12 01 WATER OP-GRANDE RESERVE COURT 51-510-75-00-7502 22,988.77 02 ORDERED PAYMENT #32 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 22,988.77 * CHECK TOTAL: 22,988.77 513703 WATERSYS WATER SOLUTIONS UNLIMITED, INC 31680 06/15/12 01 WATER OP-PHOSPHATE 51-510-56-00-5638 2,070.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,070.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 2,070.00 513704 WECKBACJ JEFFREY A. WECKBACH, JR. 070612 07/06/12 01 ADMIN-KMA, KCMA & IAMMA DUES 01-110-54-00-5460 55.00 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 55.00 CHECK TOTAL: 55.00 513705 WERDERW WALLY WERDERICH 062712 06/27/12 01 POLICE-JUNE 20 & JUNE 27 ADMIN 01-210-54-00-5467 300.00 -41- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 40 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/29/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ------------------------------------------------------------------ 513705 WERDERW WALLY WERDERICH 062712 06/27/12 02 HEARINGS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 * 062712-MAY 06/27/12 01 POLICE-MAY 9 & MAY 23 ADMIN 01-210-54-00-5467 300.00 02 HEARINGS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 600.00 513706 WHOLTIRE WHOLESALE TIRE 141651 06/25/12 01 POLICE-TIRE REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 15.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 15.00 * 141653 06/25/12 01 POLICE-TIRE MOUNT, BALANCE & 01-210-54-00-5495 22.00 02 DISPOSAL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 22.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 37.00 513707 WTRPRD WATER PRODUCTS, INC. 0232636 06/08/12 01 LAND CASH-PARTS FOR PARKING 72-720-60-00-6036 79.20 02 LOT AT RAINTREE B ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 79.20 CHECK TOTAL: 79.20 513708 YBSD YORKVILLE BRISTOL 0551-009396628 05/31/12 01 WATER OP-MAY FEES 51-510-54-00-5445 7,941.01 INVOICE TOTAL: 7,941.01 071012 07/10/12 01 TRUST & AGENCY-JUNE 2012 95-000-24-00-2450 268, 896.10 -42- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 41 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513708 YBSD YORKVILLE BRISTOL 071012 07/10/12 02 SANITARY FEES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 268,696.10 * CHECK TOTAL: 276, 837.11 513709 YORKACE YORKVILLE ACE & RADIO SHACK 143745 05/21/12 01 STREETS-CHAIN LOOP 01-410-56-00-5640 45.48 INVOICE TOTAL: 45.48 * 144236 06/18/12 01 POLICE-EXTENSION CORD 01-210-56-00-5620 19.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 19.99 * 144290 06/21/12 01 POLICE-KEY 01-210-56-00-5620 3.49 INVOICE TOTAL: 3.49 * 144339 06/25/12 01 COMM/DEV-STAPLES 01-220-56-00-5630 4.49 INVOICE TOTAL. 4.49 * 144378 06/27/12 01 POLICE-KEY 01-210-56-00-5620 10.47 INVOICE TOTAL: 10.47 * 144498 07/05/12 01 POLICE-KEY 01-210-56-00-5620 4.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 4.98 * 144502 07/05/12 01 POLICE-GM CHIPKEY 01-210-56-00-5620 50.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 * 144504 07/05/12 01 POLICE-GM CHIPKEY 01-210-56-00-5620 50.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 188.90 513710 YORKCLER YORKVILLE CLERK'S ACCOUNT -43- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 42 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/24/12 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------- 513710 YORKCLER YORKVILLE CLERK'S ACCOUNT 155154 06/26/12 01 WATER OP-FILING WATER LIENS 51-510-54-00-5448 343.00 02 WATER OP-RELEASING WATER LIENS 51-510-54-00-5448 49.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 392.00 CHECK TOTAL: 392.00 513711 YORKGFPC PETTY CASH 062912 06/29/12 01 ADMIN-REIMBURSEMENT FOR AFLAC 01-000-22-00-2260 21.05 02 FINANCE-GFOA CONFERENCE 01-120-54-00-5415 42.00 03 PARKING REIMBURSEMENT FOR ** COMMENT ** 05 TWO DAYS ** COMMENT ** 06 WATER OP-KCWA DUES AND LUNCH 51-510-54-00-5412 20.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 83.05 CHECK TOTAL: 83.05 513712 YORKNAPA YORKVILLE NAPA AUTO PARTS 006976 06/19/12 01 STREETS-ADHESIVE REFLECTOR 01-410-54-00-5495 11.52 INVOICE TOTAL: 11.52 007291 06/21/12 01 POLICE-HALOGEN CAPSULE 01-210-56-00-5640 44.82 INVOICE TOTAL: 44.82 007864 06/27/12 01 STREETS-OIL 01-410-56-00-5640 6.49 INVOICE TOTAL: 6.49 CHECK TOTAL: 62.83 513713 YORKPDPC YORKVILLE POLICE DEPT. 062612 06/26/12 01 POLICE-REGISTRATION RENEWAL 01-210-56-00-5620 99.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 99.00 -44- DATE: 07/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 43 TIME: 09:25:05 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 07/29/12 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM ITEM AMT NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # --------------------------------------------------------------- 513713 YORKPDPC YORKVILLE POLICE DEPT. 071012 07/10/12 01 POLICE-WATER FOR POLICE 01-210-56-00-5620 14.60 02 WORKING THE FOURTH OF JULY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 14.60 * CHECK TOTAL: 113.60 513714 YORKSELF YORKVILLE SELF STORAGE, INC 062212-45 06/22/12 01 STORAGE 01-210-54-00-5485 75.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 75.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 75.00 513715 YOUNGM MARLYS J. YOUNG 061212 07/07/12 01 ADMIN-JUNE 12TH COW MEETING 01-110-54-00-5462 121.98 02 MINUTES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 121.98 * 061312 06/26/12 01 ADMIN-JUNE 13 PLAN COMMISSION 01-110-54-00-5462 43.25 02 MEETING MINUTES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 43.25 * CHECK TOTAL: 165.23 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 548,056.54 -45- UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY 7/6/2012 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS ADMINISTRATION $ 9,183.63 $ - $ 9,183.63 $ 885.30 $ 646.69 $ 10,715.62 FINANCE 6,598.69 - 6,598.69 665.04 512.10 7,775.83 POLICE 72,730.66 2,867.29 75,597.95 444.45 5,529.14 81,571.54 COMMUNITY DEV. 7,624.08 - 7,624.08 668.44 563.64 8,856.16 STREETS 9,907.97 701.12 10,609.09 1,022.71 782.59 12,414.39 WATER 10,759.11 203.77 10,962.88 1,056.84 801.75 12,821.47 SEWER 7,247.97 - 7,247.97 698.71 539.69 8,486.37 PARKS 17,937.99 206.46 18,144.45 1,513.71 1,346.57 21,004.73 RECREATION 10,226.51 - 10,226.51 811.71 755.95 11,794.17 REC. CENTER 7,451.26 - 7,451.26 272.29 577.80 8,301.35 LIBRARY 16,871.36 - 16,871.36 901.66 1,263.02 19,036.04 TOTALS $ 176,539.23 $ 3,978.64 $ 180,517.87 $ 8,940.86 $ 13,318.94 $ 202,777.67 TOTAL PAYROLL $ 202,777.67 -46- UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY 7/20/2012 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS MAYOR & LIQ. COM. $ 908.34 $ - $ 908.34 $ - $ 69.49 $ 977.83 CLERK 641.67 - 641.67 23.30 37.37 702.34 TREASURER 300.00 - 300.00 28.92 22.95 351.87 ALDERMAN 3,900.00 - 3,900.00 375.96 463.45 4,739.41 ADMINISTRATION 10,178.13 - 10,178.13 885.30 505.01 11,568.44 FINANCE 6,696.19 - 6,696.19 645.52 496.61 7,838.32 POLICE 74,533.07 8,480.79 83,013.86 444.45 6,083.55 89,541.86 COMMUNITY DEV. 7,748.66 - 7,748.66 680.45 573.17 9,002.28 STREETS 9,913.75 - 9,913.75 955.68 731.11 11,600.54 WATER 10,950.63 ' 104.81 11,055.44 1,065.75 807.13 12,928.32 SEWER 7,247.99 - 7,247.99 698.71 539.69 8,486.39 PARKS 17,509.49 137.64 17,647.13 1,482.54 1,297.09 20,426.76 RECREATION 8,651.53 - 8,651.53 790.25 635.48 10,077.26 REC. CENTER 6,255.26 - 6,255.26 277.84 478.62 7,011.72 LIBRARY 15,920.62 - 15,920.62 901.66 1,190.27 18,012.55 TOTALS $ 181,355.33 $ 8,723.24 $ 190,078.57 $ 9,256.33 $ 13,930.99 $ 213,265.89 TOTAL PAYROLL $ 213,265.89 -47- UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL BILL LIST SUMMARY Tuesday, July 24, 2012 PAYROLL DATE BI-WEEKLY 7/6/2012 $202,777.67 BI-WEEKLY 7/20/2012 $206,494.44 ELECTED OFFICIAL 7/20/2012 $6,771.45 TOTAL PAYROLL $416,043.56 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BILLS LIST-FY 12 7/24/2012 $2,001.79 BILLS LIST-FY 13 7/24/2012 $547,254.24 MANUAL BILL LIST-YORKVILLE POST OFFICE-06/30 UB BILLS 6/29/2012 $2,052.00 MANUAL BILL LIST-ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE-TITLE&PLATES FOR PD 7/2/2012 $210.00 MANUAL BILL LIST-STORIE BUILD PROGRAM 7/16/2012 $10,000.00 TOTAL BILLS PAID $561,518.03 ONLINE PAYMENTS LINCOLN FINANCIAL-JULY LIFE INS.PREMIUMS 6/29/2012 $1,019.57 BCBS-JULY HEALTH&DENTAL INSURANCE 7/10/2012 $90,785.13 SHELL GASOLINE-MAY PW GASOLINE 7/6/2012 $3,089.04 BP AMOCO OIL COMPANY-MAY PW GASOLINE 7/10/2012 $132.21 BP AMOCO OIL COMPANY-MAY PD GASOLINE 7/10/2012 $205.14 SPEEDWAY GAS-JUNE GASOLINE 7/11/2012 $2,872.79 TOTAL BILLS PAID $98,103.88 WIRE TRANSFERS IEPA WIRE TRANSFER-L17-0130-BILL 39/PRINCIPAL PMT 7/20/2012 $18,810.55 IEPA WIRE TRANSFER-L17-0130-BILL 39/INTEREST PMT 7/20/2012 $679.44 OLD SECOND BANK-SAFE DEPOSIT BOX 7/19/2012 $45.00 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS $19,534.99 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $1,095,200.46 -48- 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� a► Legal ❑ CA#2 W36 EST. Finance ■ Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator El r� �! �© Consultant El CC 2012-51 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Treasurer's Report for June 2012 Meeting and Date: City Council —July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE TREASURER'S REPORT-for the period ending JUNE 30,2012 Cash Basis %of %of Revenues YTD Expenses YTD June Revenues YTD Revenues Budget Budget June Expenses YTD Expenses Budget Budget General Fund 01 -General 2,073,298 3,334,665 12,311,109 27% 859,533 1,491,660 11,379,867 13% Special Revenue Funds 15-Motor Fuel Tax 36,801 69,864 454,547 15% 106 106 573,860 0% 79-Parks and Recreation 126,238 308,722 1,451,447 21% 108,903 195,100 1,506,767 13% 72-Land Cash 4,871 12,050 420,500 3% 15,768 16,218 323,825 5% 87-Countryside TIF 223 458 6,500 7% 95 62,429 306,043 20% 88-Downtown TIF 19,248 22,410 70,150 32% 2,869 2,869 41,500 7% 11 -Fox Hill SSA 1,286 1,838 3,786 49% 529 529 4,500 12% 12-Sunflower SSA 2,467 3,837 7,531 51% 1,312 1,312 9,986 13% Debt Service Fund 42-Debt Service 125,634 180,564 427,144 42% 63,296 65,292 505,370 13% Capital Funds 16-Municipal Building 1,050 2,550 5,250 49% 450 750 - - 22-Park and Recreation Capital 36 924 43,500 2% 208 417 52,500 1% 20-Police Capital 3,808 6,717 29,200 23% 12,256 57,198 60,000 95% 21 -Public Works Capital 6,485 15,435 53,500 29% 9,007 16,865 169,795 10% 23-City-Wide Capital 40,599 81,598 1,303,732 6% 33,161 39,201 1,040,500 4% Enterprise Funds 51-Water 526,834 580,187 2,801,379 21% 359,946 804,360 3,085,983 26% 52-Sewer 225,801 555,712 1,639,817 34% 208,179 241,696 1,895,210 13% 80-Recreation Center 45,076 98,336 622,500 16% 44,881 127,984 703,633 18% Library Funds 82-Library Operations 252,895 366,525 817,634 45% 52,526 111,347 794,413 14% 83-Library Debt Service 282,291 397,361 797,299 50% 177,744 177,744 795,488 22% 84-Library Capital 0 2,500 16,350 15% 423 423 13,474 3% Total Funds 3,774,943 6,042,251 23,282,875 26% 1,951,192 3,413,496 23,262,714 15% As Treasurer of the United City of Yorkville,I hereby attest,to the best of my knowledge,that the information contained in this Treasurer's Report is accurate as of the date detailed herein. Further information is available in the Finance Department. William Powell,Treasurer Prepared by the Finance Department Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 606 Legal ❑ CA#3 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number Human Resources ❑ `=Q Community Development EDC 2012-28 Police ALE � Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: B.U.I.L.D. Incentive Program Extension Request Meeting and Date: City Council/July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Direction for extension of the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (BUILD) Incentive Program. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 7/10/12 Action Taken: COW recommendation Item Number: EDC 2012-28 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Recommendation Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached proposed ordinance and staff memorandum regarding this matter. Cir y 2 O Memorandum EST. -1 1836 -�= To: Committee of the Whole pL I1 ® From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director C tys" CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator <kE Date: July 2, 2012 Subject: B.U.I.L.D. Incentive Program Extension Request Background & Request As the Committee of the Whole will recall, on January 10, 2012,the City Council approved a comprehensive incentive/stimulus package for new single-family detached residential construction to bolster development within Yorkville. The Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (B.U.I.L.D.) program allowed for delayed and reduced building per fees for builders, as well as a building permit fee rebate to homebuyers. As approved, the program is available to the first thirty (30) qualifying new single-family residential building permits submitted or until January 9, 2013. To date, the City has received twenty-four (24) B.U.I.L.D. permit applications. Due to this overwhelming response by new homebuyers and at the request of the homebuilder community, staff is seeking to gauge the Committee's interest in extending the B.U.I.L.D. initiative to permit an additional thirty (30) building permits to be issued as part of the program or until June 30, 2013, whichever is first. Below is an overall description of how the program actually works, its initial success, and the merits for continuing the incentive beyond its current term. Program Overview How it Works The B.U.I.L.D. program offers two (2)key benefits,which are: • To assist the developer/builder under the B.U.I.L.D. program, payment of building permit and impact fees are delayed until the issuance of the certificate of occupancy on the condition that the certificate is issued within one (1)year from building permit approval. • To assist the homebuyer, the City rebates a portion of the building permit fee, up to $5,000.00 with a matching contribution up to $5,000.00 from the builder/developer, and presents the homebuyer with a check for up to $10,000.00 after closing and upon issuance of the final certificate of occupancy. These incentives are in addition to the municipal building impact fee being reduced from $5,509.00 per residential unit to $1,759.00 per residential unit. To qualify for the B.U.I.L.D. program the property must be a new construction single-family detached structure. "Spec" houses, duplexes and townhomes are not eligible. The developer/builder must provide proof of sale or contract for sale of the lot prior to issuance of building permit, and changes in buyer or cancellation of sales contract must be reported to City immediately. Finally, the builder/developer must sign a "Developer Contribution Agreement" consenting to match, dollar for dollar, up to $5,000.00 the required contribution to be paid to the homebuyer at issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The builder's matching contribution is collected at the same time the building permit fees are due. The flexibility in the timing of the City receiving payment for permits allows builders to move forward with construction without this up-front expense. Additionally, in order to rebate the City's portion of the B.U.I.L.D. program incentive, staff collects the full amount of the building permit from the developer/builder, and refunds a portion of the permit cost back to the homeowner by rebating all or a some the following fees, listed in order of priority, to arrive at$5,000.00: CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT FEE FEE AMOUNT FOR SF DWELLING UNIT Water Connection Fee $3,700 City Sewer Connection Fee $2,000.00 Building Permit Fee $650.00 plus$0.20 per square foot Public Works Fee $700.00 Myths &Misconceptions There seems to be a misconception that general fund revenues are being used to support the City's portion of the $5,000.00 which is rebated back to new homebuyers as part of the B.U.I.L.D. program's incentive. In reality, the funds provided to the homebuyer at time of final occupancy are essentially a partial refund of the building permit fee from the developer/builder. These funds are held in a separate escrow account which is not part of the revenue collected from real estate taxes. Therefore, no taxpayer dollars are being used to financially support the B.U.I.L.D. program, as it is self-funded. Rather than offer a stimulus such as reducing the building permit fees by $5,000.00, which would benefit the developer/builder, the City chose this method of rebating that amount at the back end to the homebuyer to ensure the reduction in cost was being directly passed on the residents (current or future) of our City. There are other building permits that the City issues which work similarly to the B.U.I.L.D. program, such as the "deposit" system for temporary signs (banners, grand openings, etc.) approved by the City Council in 2010 as a means of assisting local business owners. In this instance, instead of the City collecting a $50.00 fee, we require a $50.00 deposit with the temporary sign application which is then refunded back to the applicant after the removal of the sign. Again, no general fund revenues from real estate tax dollars are involved. Initial Success As stated previously, since the City Council's approval of the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (B.U.I.L.D.) program this past January, the Building Department has received twenty- four (24) applications (see attached) for new single-family detached residences as part of the incentive. This is in addition to eighteen (18) regular new home start building permit applications, bringing the overall total of new residential construction permit applications to forty-two (42) since the beginning of the year. In six months, the City has nearly matched the 43 new single-family residential home starts issued for the entire calendar year of 2011. The bar chart below compares the number of B.U.I.L.D. permits to non-B.U.I.L.D. new single-family residential permits applied for between January 2012 and June 2012. In each month, with the exception of March, the B.U.I.L.D. permits have out-paced the traditional building permit applications. 10 s 6 ❑SFD 4 ❑B.U.1.L.D. 2 0 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Water Connection Fee of$3,700 became effective on June 15,2006. Merits of Program The B.U.I.L.D. program has been well-received from the building community and garnered significant interest from the public and press. Several articles in the Beacon News, Kendall County Record and soon in the Chicago Sun Times newspapers have been published about the program. Staff has also been asked to speak about the program to real estate developers and other municipal leaders at the Navigating the Real Estate Market in 2012 seminar hosted in April by the real estate law firm Dykema Gossett PLLC, housing market consultants Metrostudy Corporation and contractors and environmental consultants EnCAP, Inc. We have also been contacted from various local municipalities and a municipality in Minnesota about duplicating this program in their communities. WIIFY(What's In It for Yorkville)? So what are the benefits of the B.U.I.L.D. program for the residents of Yorkville and the City as a whole? Simply stated, the program increases roof-tops sooner in the City which might not have otherwise come, now or possibly ever. The new homes attract more commercial businesses which in turn generates increased sales tax revenue, thereby lessening the overall tax burden of all the residents within the City. The average construction value of the B.U.I.L.D. permit applications submitted was approximately $190K, and generated approximately $330,000.00 in permit fees. Less the $5,000 rebated for each of the 24 permits applied for, the City increased its revenue by over $200,000.00 in just six-months due to the B.U.I.L.D. program alone. Consequently, most of the builders who applied for permits through B.U.I.L.D. opted to pay the permits upfront rather than take advantage of the delayed payment until time of final occupancy. Program Feedback The participating builders of the B.U.I.L.D. program thus far include Pulte Homes Corporation, McCue Builders and Tim Greyer Builders. The permits being applied for under the program were for new single-family detached residences in the Bristol Bay (Pulte), Autumn Creek (Pulte), Blackberry Woods (McCue), Country Hills (McCue) and Heartland Circle (Greyer) subdivisions. Preliminary feedback from the builders has been overwhelmingly positive and they have felt the program provided the needed incentive to spur new residential development in the community. Some developers/builders have inquired about that other options for providing their matching contribution such as down-payment assistance to the buyer or dollar-for-dollar property upgrades. Currently, staff has issued four (4) B.U.LL.D. program $10,000.00 checks to new homebuyers after their closings and upon final certificate of occupancy. All were looking at other communities to either purchase or build a new home before choosing Yorkville, with most stating the program was easy to understand and would recommend a friend of family member interested in building a new home consider Yorkville specifically because of the B.U.I.L.D. program. Staff Comments Staff is seeking direction from the Committee of the Whole regarding the proposed extension of the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (B.U.I.L.D.) program for an additional thirty (30) building permits or until June 30, 2013, whichever is first based. We will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to answer any questions from the Committee regarding this request. DATE: 07/02/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:01:44 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID: PT420000.WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 07/02/2012 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: BIP PERMIT # APPLIED FEE IMPROV- TYPE STATUS DATE LOCATION TYPE CODE VALUE CONTRACTOR MENT OF USE PERMIT FEE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20120018 02/13/2012 378 BERTRAM DR BIP *** 165,462.00 PULTE HOMES NEW RES 16,447.80 C OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: BRB LOT: 1034 20120028 02/17/2012 2279 LAVENDER WAY BIP *** 136, 851.00 PULTE HOMES NEW RES 13,376.49 C OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 71 20120030 02/23/2012 1979 MEADOWLARK LN BIP *** 275,000.00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 20, 120.00 C OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO BOX 354 BRISTOL,IL 60512 SUB: CNT LOT: 118 20120036 03/01/2012 1292 DEERPATH DR BIP *** 180, 000.00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 14,032.20 I OWNER: HC LAND PARTNERS 6125 REDGATE LN YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB: HLC LOT: 227 20120077 03/27/2012 2557 EMERALD LN BIP *** 175,372.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,578.69 I OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 128 20120083 03/29/2012 1554 CRIMSON LN BIP *** 161, 636.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,497.89 C OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELE SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 301 20120100 04/05/2012 4612 PLYMOUTH AVE BIP *** 111,928.00 PULTE BRISTOL BAY NEW RES 16, 103.40 I OWNER: PULTE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: BRB LOT: 995 20120101 04/05/2012 2383 LAVENDER WAY BIP *** 106,046.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 170.89 I OWNER: PULTE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 90 20120113 04/12/2012 1145 GRACE DR BIP *** 245,000.00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 8,956.20 I OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS INC PO BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60560 SUB: HLC LOT: 67 20120125 04/18/2012 1562 CRIMSON LN BIP *** 175,372.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,578.69 I OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 201 20120126 04/18/2012 1092 CARLY DR BIP *** 318,240.00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 16,463.78 I OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO BOX 354 BRISTOL,IL 60512 SUB: BBW LOT: 30 20120165 05/07/2012 1273 TAUS CIR BIP *** 180, 000.00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 8,529.60 I OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 REDGATE LN YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB: HLC LOT: 117 20120183 05/16/2012 827 GREENFIELD TURN BIP *** 270, 000.00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 15,321.80 I OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS/GARY FRANCIS PO BOX 354 BRISTOL,IL 60512 SUB: CNT LOT: 51 20120184 05/17/2012 2441 EMERALD LN BIP *** 180,530.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,578.69 I OWNER: PULTE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 114 20120185 05/17/2012 1494 CRIMSON LN BIP *** 136,570.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,327.49 I OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 901 20120205 05/29/2012 1192 KATE DR BIP *** 220, 000.00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 8,933.80 A OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 REDGATE LN YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB: HLC LOT: 236 DATE: 07/02/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 15:01:44 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID: PT420000.WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 07/02/2012 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: BIP PERMIT # APPLIED FEE IMPROV- TYPE STATUS DATE LOCATION TYPE CODE VALUE CONTRACTOR MENT OF USE PERMIT FEE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20120217 05/31/2012 IN THE CIRCLE BIP *** 250, 000.00 SELF NEW RES 13,555.00 A OWNER: SCOTT SLEEZER I SUB: HLC 20120218 06/04/2012 1377 SPRING ST BIP *** 289,565.00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 14,012.40 I OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO 354 BRISTOL,IL 60512 SUB: HLC LOT: 254 20120244 06/18/2012 1519 CRIMSON LN BIP *** 170, 850.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,552.09 I OWNER: PULTE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 1601 20120245 06/18/2012 1546 CRIMSON LN BIP *** 132, 668.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,327.49 I OWNER: PULTE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 401 1 20120275 06/26/2012 2420 SAGE CT BIP *** 153,578.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,450.49 A OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 3101 20120276 06/26/2012 1530 CRIMSON LN BIP *** 151, 810.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,439.69 A OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 601 20120277 06/26/2012 1511 CRIMSON LN BIP *** 175,372.00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,578.69 A OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 1501 20120278 06/26/2012 4620 PLYMOUTH AVE BIP *** 126, 922.00 PULTE BRISTOL BAY NEW RES 13,293.69 A OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: BRB LOT: 994 y DATE: 07/02/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 15:01:44 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID: PT420000.WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 07/02/2012 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: BIP CODE & DESCRIPTION # OF PERMITS CONSTRUCTION VALUE AVERAGE VALUE PERMIT FEES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: BIP BUILD INCENTIVE PROGRAM SFD 24 $4, 488, 772.00 $187,032.17 $327,226.95 IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY: NEW NEW 24 $4,488,772.00 $187, 032.17 $327,226.95 TYPE OF USE SUMMARY: RES RESIDENTIAL 24 $4, 488,772.00 $187,032.17 $327,226.95 STATUS SUMMARY: A APPLIED 6 $1, 077, 682.00 $179, 613.67 $76,251.36 C CLOSED FILE 4 $738, 949.00 $184,737.25 $63,442.18 I ISSUED 14 $2, 672, 141.00 $190,867.21 $187,533.41 SUBDIVISION SUMMARY: AC AUTUMN CREEK 12 $1, 856, 655.00 $154,721.25 $161,457.28 BBW BLACKBERRY WOODS 1 $318,240.00 $318,240.00 $16,463.78 BRB BRISTOL BAY 3 $404,312.00 $134,770.67 $45,844.89 CNT COUNTRY HILLS 2 $545,000.00 $272,500.00 $35,441.80 HLC HEARTLAND CIRCLE 6 $1,364,565.00 $227,427.50 $68,019.20 REPORT SUMMARY: 24 $4, 488,772.00 $187,032.17 $327,226.95 *** - Multiple Fee Codes Matched Ordinance No. 2012- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS,EXTENDING THE NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2012-03 (B.U.I.L.D. Program) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City adopted Ordinance Number 2012-03 on January 12, 2012 adopting a residential construction incentive and stimulus program known as the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount(`B.U.I.L.D Program"); and WHEREAS, the B.U.I.L.D Program has been successful in the City receiving 24 applications to participate in the first 6 months of the B.U.I.L.D. Program; and WHEREAS, The Mayor and City Council have reviewed the success of the B.U.I.L.D. Program and have determined that it is in the best interest of the City and its future growth to authorize an additional thirty(30)building permits or extend the time for application until June 30, 2013 whichever occurs first. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That Ordinance Number 2012-03 be and is herby amended by amending Sections 2 and 3 of said Ordinance to read as follows: "Section 2. Residential Building Permit Fee Rebate. Building permit fees up to $5,000 shall be rebated for the first sixty (60) new homebuyers on the condition that the homebuyer intends the home to be the buyer's permanent residence and the developer/builder agrees to match the City's rebate dollar for dollar. Section 3. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage by the Mayor and City Council and approval as provided by law and shall expire on the first to occur of the issuance of sixty (60) building permits qualifying for the rebate as hereinabove provided or June 30, 2013." Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Ordinance No.2012- Page 1 Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2012. MAYOR Ordinance No.2012- Page 2 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 606 Legal ❑ CA#4 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number Human Resources ❑ `=Q Community Development EDC 2012-29 Police ALE � Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Resolution Adopting the Blackberry Creek Watershed Action Plan Meeting and Date: City Council /July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached Resolution and Blackberry Creek Watershed Action Plan executive summary. The complete Blackberry Creek Watershed Action Plan can be viewed online at: http://foxriverecosystem.org/WatershedPlanning/Blackberry/DocsBBC_FullPlan-Final.pdf RESOLUTION NO. 2012- RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BLACKBERRY CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN WHEREAS,the Blackberry Creek Watershed Planning group, representing a diversity of watershed stakeholders, has been working in a collaborative manner since 2010 to prepare a comprehensive watershed-based plan for the Blackberry Creek Watershed in Kane and Kendall Counties, Illinois; and WHEREAS, stewardship of watershed resources including water quality is important to the prosperity of residents and landowners of the United City of Yorkville and elsewhere in the Blackberry Creek Watershed; and WHEREAS, a purpose of the Blackberry Creek Watershed Action Plan is to identify opportunities for watershed communities to integrate watershed management goals and objectives in local planning, natural resource protection, and development activities; and WHEREAS, a purpose of the Blackberry Creek Watershed Action Plan is to identify opportunities to protect and improve surface water and groundwater quality by implementing best management practices and programs; and WHEREAS, the Blackberry Creek Watershed Action Plan offers reasoned guidance to urban and rural landowners and decision-makers alike for conserving the land, soil, and water resources of the Blackberry Creek Watershed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the United City of Yorkville supports a collective effort to implement the projects,programs, and policies recommended in the Blackberry Creek Watershed Action Plan. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING LARRY KOT JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Resolution No.2012- Page 1 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2012. MAYOR Resolution No.2012- Page 2 I r , At 9 i_r la em r ekr � ,Saw_ - _ _ aterw he Ctn Plan -4 r , Executive Summar X45 � ,�I � � + � � j I � � II�• ' F111 1 1 i 0 P k '`� rr � I 11 - rt, r ,�- ,•�'�. X11. , o.� , ��- 5L Decerber2011 F �,�t• , ,� ,u Planning to protect local water resources Beginning in fall 2oio,community members in south central Kane County and north central Kendall County met to participate in a planning opportunity to protect water resources in the Blackberry Creek Watershed.More than go local residents,community leaders,representatives of governmental agencies, organizations,businesses,and others participated in meetings and provided input for over a year.The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning(CMAP) developed a watershed action plan integrating local priorities for protecting water quality and watershed health. - r... r POW- (4, M PLANNING TO PROTECT LOCAL WATER RESOURCES 3 What is Watershed Planning? Watershed planningis avoluntary,collaborative public process involving local residents, The Conservation Foundation(TCF)and the Fox River Ecosystem Partnership(FREP) governmental agencies,organizations,businesses,and other interested community were both partners in the planning process.In coordination with CMAP and FREP, members.These"stakeholders"are the individuals or parties participating in the TCF served as the watershed coordinator,convened local stakeholders,and executed planning process,along with the interests they represent,since they all have a vested an information and outreach campaign during the planning process.FREP supported interest,or stake,in the overall health of the place in which they live,work,or play.The the outreach and education effort by upgrading their website,serving as a source planning process and resulting plan are informed by both local knowledge and science- of watershed planning news and information,and highlightingwatershed planning based information.Addressing nonpoint-source pollution to protect good water quality activities in their monthly Downstream e-newsletter.The Blackberry Creek Watershed or improve poor water quality is the primary purpose for developing a watershed-based Action Plan(Plan)can be found at http:ffifoxriverecos-.stern.org/blackberry htm and plan.However,other objectives also can be pursued,since they are often related to the http://cmap.illinois.gov/watershed-planningl. health of our water resources. Land Clearing A watershed is defined as the land area from which surface runoff from precipitation Agriculture , Dams Traditional Urban drains to a common point downhill: typically a stream,river,lake,or wetland.In this and • Development planning process,the watershed is used as an organizing principle for understanding the Livestock = - ° Air pollution interrelationships between the manyways that people view,impact,and interactwith — both land and water resources.When combined with an adaptive management approach '� -�� mot, to plan implementation,the plan and those who produced it offer a potentially effective _ framework for producing and evaluating project and policy recommendations to correct { water resource problems.It is from this viewpoint that the Blackberry Creek Watershed Action Plan was created. { The Blackberry Creek Watershed planning process was designed to be stakeholder- driven with assistance from CMAP and other partner agencies.As the project lead, -" CMAP facilitated monthly meetings from September zoio through December zou and provided technical assistance for the watershed-based plan.CMAP also facilitated a kick Pollutants Human impacts on our 1 and Spills off meeting in September zoio,held two evening open houses to give awidervariety of watersheds will increase stakeholders an opportunity to learn about and participate in the planning process,and with continued population growth and Septic met with local officials to discuss water resource planning and project opportunities in development. Fields their communities.Together these activities directed the development of the watershed- wells based plan based on stakeholder input and best professionaljudgment. Figure 2.Why do watersheds matter? Watersheds are important because what we Adapted from do on the land directly affects the quality of our Healthy watersheds,Healthy People, surface waters,drinking water supply,local Washington Department of Ecology,2008 economy,wildlife habitat,and recreational resources. 1 Information highlighted in the Executive Summary is documented comprehensively in the full plan. 4 BLACKBERRY CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN Introduction: The Blackberry Creek Watershed A subwatershed of the Fox River Basin in Illinois,the Blackberry Creek Watershed spans south-central Kane and north-central Kendall Counties and has a drainage area of nearly 75 square miles.This watershed(Hydrologic Unit Code 0712,000702)includes portions of the Cities of Aurora,Batavia,and Yorkville; the Villages of Campton Hills,Elburn,North Aurora,Sugar Grove,Montgomery, and Oswego;and unincorporated areas in Kane and Kendall Counties including portions of Campton,Kaneville,Blackberry,Batavia,Geneva,Sugar Grove,and Bristol Townships. The watershed is located on the urban fringe of the Chicago metropolitan area.Kane and Kendall Counties are two of the fastest growing counties in Illinois(Kendall is the fastest and Kane is the fifth in growth rates as compared to the rest of the state.)The total population residing in the Blackberry Creek Watershed is approximately 6o,000. Table 1:Blackberry Creek Watershed-basic facts Size of watershed 74.7 square miles(47,797 acres) Counties,nunicipalities,&townships Kane&Kendall Counties; Cities of Aurora,Batavia,& Yorkville; Villages of Campton Hills,Elburn,North Aurora, Sugar Grove,Montgomery,&Oswego; Campton,Kaneville, Blackberry,Batavia,Geneva,Sugar Grove,Aurora,& Bristol Townships Population(2010) 63,279 people Incorporated&unincorporated land(2005) 18,817 acres(39%)/28,980 acres(61%) Land in residential use(2005) 9,047 acres(19%) Land in agricultural use(2005) 22,987 acres(48%) Land in open space(2005) 5,414 acres(11%) Length of stream network 66 miles Elevation range 1,016 to 570 feet above mean sea level Water supply source Groundwater Dominant soil type Silt loam or silty clay loam,hydrologic soils group B INTRODUCTION:THE BLACKBERRY CREEK WATERSHED 5 Figure 3. Blackberry Creek Watershed within the Fox River Basin F)x River Basin Cal ills Campton St Charles Wisconsin �Ix m m m - - �� r \� r Illinois �rt Lake Michigan Blackberry Creek Watershed r � � �� o 1 z 4 6 BLACKBERRY CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN Purpose of the Plan Stakeholder Concerns and Goals The Plan provides a roadmap for protecting and improving local water quality and Asa first task in developing plan recommendations,stakeholders identified local water thus the quality of life for those that live,work,and playwithin the Blackberry Creek quality concerns.Alongwith the Illinois EPA-identified fecal coliform impairment in Watershed.Water quality is generally evaluated by the absence or presence of Blackberry Creek,stakeholders identified nutrients,sediment,and other pollutants certain elements(e.g.,water chemistry)or attributes(e.g.,aquatic biology,physical in runoff as potential concerns to creek health.They specifically noted soil erosion characteristics of stream network).Although many of these elements are naturally from land and streambanks,herbicides and pesticides from lawns,golf courses,and occurring and not innately harmful,it is their excessive concentrations that can agricultural land,large numbers of Canada geese alongvarious sections of the creek, negatively affect water quality.The table below provides a summary of common water and the presence of foam in a specific creek area.Stakeholders were also concerned quality indicators and associated sources or causes of impairment. with the water quality,habitat,and flooding impacts of channel modifications and constraining structures built across the creek(e.g.,bridges,culverts,dams). Table 2:Water quality characteristics Groundwater concerns focused on impacts to groundwater sources from additional pumping due to increased development. WATER QUALITY INDICATOR POTENTIAL PRIMARY SOURCES OF IMPAIRMENT The stakeholders then formulated goals toward protecting and improving Blackberry Chloride Road salt,water softeners Creek's quality.The final goals outlined here capture the desired outcomes for the Fecal coliform Potentially many,including failing septic systems,pet waste, watershed.Recommendations found throughout the Plan address each of these goals. waterfowl and other wildlife waste,manure,illicit sewer connections,etc. • Reduce fecal coliform contributions(an indicator of bacterial contamination) Dissolved oxygen Sediment oxygen demand,algal blooms/respiration, • Reduce nutrient loadings and other emerging pollutant loadings hydrologic modification Phosphorus Wastewater treatment plants,septic systems,urban& • Minimize sedimentation,siltation,streambank,and streambed erosion agricultural runoff including pet,waterfowl/wildlife,& • Reduce risk of floodingthrough initiatives to improve water quality livestock waste Nitrogen Wastewater treatment plants,septic systems,urban& • Protect groundwater resources agricultural runoff including pet,waterfowl/wildlife,& livestock waste * Promote awareness of watershed resources and threats Suspended sediments Erosion from streambanks,lakeshores,construction sites, As the only confirmed contaminant in Blackberry Creek,a target load reduction for fecal agricultural fields coliform was adopted by the stakeholders.Stakeholders set a fecal coliform target load reduction of 17%for the geometric mean of the number of fecal coliforms Regular testing of Illinois'streams and lakes for these and other water quality concerns per 100 mL,as determined from water samples collected in accordance with the is managed by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency(EPA).Waterbodies are guidelines specified in the Illinois water quality standard for fecal coliform.This assessed for certain designated uses(e.g.,aquatic life,primary contact,water supply) pollutant-load reduction is derived from data collected by Illinois EPA compared with the and the results are reported every two years in the Illinois Integrated Water Quality Illinois water quality standard for fecal coliform. Report and Section 303(d)List(Integrated Report.)In the 2010 Integrated Report cycle, Blackberry Creek was assessed and determined to be in full support for the aquatic life designated use and in nonsupport for the primary contact(e.g.,swimming)designated use.Illinois EPA determined the cause of the primary contact nonsupport is due to fecal coliform(an indicator of bacterial contamination),but the particular source(s)of this impairment is unknown. PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS 7 Plan recommendations In order to work towards achieving the pollutant-load reduction,Plan recommendations focus in part on reducing fecal coliform loadings from potential sources.Recommendations also address water quality protection more broadly, including planning,programs,and projects to reduce stormwater runoff volumes and nutrient and sediment loadings to the streams,lakes,and wetlands within the Blackberry Creek Watershed,as well as to protect and restore stream,lake,wetland, and riparian habitat. Policy and Planning/Programming The policy recommendations of the Plan focus mostly on actions that local units of Open Space Reserve government within the watershed can take or adopt that may protect or improve the In this category,an interconnected network of hubs and corridors are proposed for water quality by addressing potential sources of fecal coliform.A green infrastructure inclusion in an open space protection program that encompasses ecologically sensitive framework was used to shape watershed-wide recommendations with a specific focus lands.The goal of this network is to assure continued flood water storage,protect on land-use decisions that may impact water resources.Such an approach to water wetlands,provide habitat in the stream corridor,and preserve ecosystem functions that quality protection is defined by a range of natural and built systems that can occur at society values3 while minimizing stormwater runoff and nonpoint-source pollution. the regional,community,and site scales?At the regional scale,green infrastructure The hubs are composed of currently protected public and private open space and refers to a network of connected open space and natural lands and waters that provide proposed open space to be connected by the stream network and existing trails and important environmental functions.At the community and neighborhood scales, greenways. Ideally,and to provide the highest ecological functions,these lands are green infrastructure incorporates design approaches such as compact,mixed-use preserved and restored to native land coverwherever possible and realistic.The data that developments,urban forestry,parking reductions,and other strategies that reduce were analyzed to create the Open Space Reserve include the Blackberry Creek stream impervious(non-water absorbing)surfaces,such as conventional roofs,parking lots,and network,threatened and endangered species and the Illinois Natural Areas Inventory driveways.At the site scale,green infrastructure is manifested by practices that retain, sites,Phase II Wellhead Protection Areas,and greenways and trails corridors.These data infiltrate,and evaporate(through evapotranspiration)stormwater to mimic natural were then considered in the context of agricultural and vacant/wetland sites from the systems.Under this framework,lands in the watershed fall into four main categories: CMAP 2005 Land Use Inventory to identify open space protection opportunities(Figure 4). Open Space Reserve,Planned Development,Developed Lands,and Agricultural Lands. 2 U.S.EPA.Water Quality Scorecard:Incorporating Green Infrastructure Practices at the Municipal,Neighborhood,and Site Scales. EPA 231-B-09-001.Washington,DC:U.S.EPA,2009.http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/water_scorecard.htm (accessed Nov.8,2011). 3 Benedict,M.A.and E.T.McMahon.Green Infrastructure:Smart Conservation forthe 21st Century.Washington,DC:The Conservation Fund,2002.http://www.conservationfund.org/sites/default/files/Gi—SC21C.Pdf(accessed Nov.21,2011). 8 BLACKBERRY CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN Planned Development Figure 4.Blackberry Creek Watershed Open Space Reserve This category includes currently undeveloped land,with certain characteristics,that is Watershed Planning Area zoned for future development.Planned Development includes developable land that falls r1 ADID Streams in one or more of the following distinctions:hydric,organic,and excessive permeability Existing open space soil locations,shallow aquifers with high contamination potential,existing oak stands, and proposed/potential greenways and trails. Open space Reserve r. Developed Lands This category represents the developed areas in the watershed where protection and restoration measures may be appropriate.These include implementing new stormwater a14 management practices in areas not currently served by such practices,as well as retrofitting existing BMPs to improve their water quality benefits. =; Agricultural Lands This category represents those lands currently managed for agricultural purposes such as crop and livestock production and equestrian uses.Policy,planning,and programming recommendations focus on pathways to help implement or enhance the various types of best management practices(BMPs)appropriate for agricultural areas.The U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resource Conservation Service(USDA-NRCS)Field Office Technical Guides comprehensively document conservation practices applicable to the State of Illinois,as well as standards and specifications for these practices. F To better frame the policy recommendations while taking into account the local _ context,governmental representatives from the stakeholder group completed a code °--_ and ordinance review that was based on a worksheet developed by the Center for � W Watershed Protection.4 The worksheet provided scoring for the extent to which current land use and development codes and ordinances agreed with model principles in the categories of Residential Streets and Parking Lots,Lot Development,and Conservation of Natural Areas.As a result of this review,a policy and planning/programming recommendations matrix,based on the green infrastructure framework,was developed (see table below).Specific ordinances and programs that are pertinent to the status F"I of the Blackberry Creek Watershed are highlighted in the full plan document.Local governments are encouraged to incorporate recommended policies and codes within " their existing regulations to offer increased protection to water resources,and are encouraged to collaborate with the relevant entities to implement programs that may be beneficial to the watershed as a whole. 0 , z 4 4 Center for Watershed Protection(CWP).Better Site Design:A Handbook for Changing Development Rules in Your Community. �� ,- Chicago Metropolitan Ellicott City,MD:CWP,1998.http://www.cwp.org/categorybiog/101-better-site-design-.html. "!` Agency for Planning Sourees:Walarsheal Planning Area•ISWS (2006).Map Roads•ESRI(2000).VM*r Fealuw-National nyyddrrography Data sal. DSGS G 007r AD1D 544 om•NIPC and Irma Cal+rty(2004):9tRer Ilanois Streams- IEPA{30041:County Eouodaries-CI4AP (2009) PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS 9 Table 3.Summary of policy and planning/programming recommendations for the Blackberry Creek Watershed GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FRAMEWORK CATEGORY RECOMMENDATIONS Open Space Reserve Policy Planning/Programming •Open space protection ordinances •Conservation easements •Open space plan development •Farmland preservation ordinances •Purchase or transfer of development rights •Wellhead protection programs •Ordinances promoting interconnectivity of •Municipal buy-back programs for areas in the 100-year floodplain •Oak stand inventory currently protected open space •Creation of conservancies of volunteer land stewards for maintenance and restoration activities in forest preserve and park district properties Implementers Implementers Municipalities and Counties Municipalities and Counties,Land trust agencies,Forest Preserve and Park Districts,Townships,Landowners Planned Development Policy Planning/Programming •Overlay zones where BMPs are required for lands •Protection measures for pre-identified sensitive lands identified as critical to source water quality .Natural lawn care and sustainable landscape practices protection and recharge •Oak stand inventory •Minimum open space requirements for subdivisions,land-cash donation ordinances •Preservation of existing/mature trees •Conservation Design/LID regulations •Landowner stewardship programs •Bonus for/require stormwater retention in new development or redevelopment Implementers Implementers Municipalities and Counties Municipalities and Counties,Developers,Landowners Developed Lands Policy Planning/Programming •Pet waste pick-up ordinances •Natural lawn care and sustainable landscape practices •Urban greening/urban forestry programs •Water Use Conservation Ordinance •Detention basin inventories and retrofit programs •Oak stand inventory •Tree Preservation Ordinances •Rain garden and rain barrel cost-share programs •Landowner stewardship programs •Sustainable road salting and maintenance programs •Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary Program certification for golf courses Implementers Implementers Municipalities and Counties Municipalities,Counties,Forest Preserve and Park Districts,Landowners,Landscape companies,Golf course owners/operators icultural Lands Policy Planning/Programming Livestock facility siting laws/ordinances,animal •Agricultural BMPs: Expansion and better-funding for •Oak stand inventory waste management ordinances USDA-NRCS/SWCD livestock operations management programs .Sealing of abandoned wells •Soil conservation practices •Integrated nutrient and/or pest management planning Implementers Implementers State,Municipalities,and Counties Landowners,County Farm Bureaus,Soil&Water Conservation Districts,USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service,USDA-Farm Service Agency,County Health Departments,University of Illinois-Extension 10 BLACKBERRY CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN On-The-Ground Projects Figure 5.Short-term project locations within the Blackberry Creek Watershed Based on the input of the stakeholders throughout the planning process plus focused 0 Watershed Planning Area meetings and discussions with staff and officials of municipalities,townships,counties, i 64 Interstate Hwy park and forest preserve districts,and homeowner associations,numerous opportunities i 1 Campton Hills f p US/State Hwy _ I-• were identified to implement projects throughout the watershed with the goal of Virgil Campton St.Charles Counties ! 38 38 t._..-_--_I Townships protecting and restoring Blackberry Creek and its tributaries.Potential projects were I 3 O Short Term Project Location divided into two categories depending on the time frame in which they might reasonably — — --- be implemented:short-term(within five years of Plan adoption)and long-term(within 2 five-ten years of Plan adoption).The short term best management practice(BMP) I Elburn r `� projects are identified in the accompanying figure and table below.They are not listed i GenevaT in any particular order,other than they are generally arranged by location from north to south.Educational signage projects are included in this"on-the-ground"BMP project atav Bia list,while education and outreach programs are highlighted in the section below.(The Kaneville 47 Blackberry long term project list can be found in the full Plan.)Both the short-term and long-term i BMP project lists are not intended to be limited only to those identified during the Batavia planning process,but to also provide examples that community members could use 14 to conceptualize other similar projects within the Blackberry Creek Watershed.The expectation is that BMP projects other than those listed in the Plan that provide similar 31 _ water quality benefits would be eligible for Nonpoint-Source Pollution Control Program North Aurora grant funding from Illinois EPA,among other grant programs offered by local,state,and 10 ss federal agencies and organizations. 67 1/1 9 8. ! i Big Rock 30 SugarGrie i Aurora Sugar Grove i Aurora I I Kane Co. 13 12 1 q 0 Montgomery 1 31 Kendall Co. N w t s Bristol 47 Miles Little Rock Oswego 0 1 2 4 Oswego Chicago Metropolitan 34 71 Agency for Planning Sources:Watershed Planning Area-ISWS (2005);Major Road'-ESRI(2000);Water Feature.-National Hydrography Datmet, Yorkville USGS(2007);ADID Stream.-NIPC and Kane Kendall L_ ------�,,�---- Count,(2004);Other Illinois Streams-IEPA and FOX I Na-Au-Say (2004);County, CMAA Township 00 Municipal ). PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS 11 Table 4.Short-term projects within the Blackberry Creek Watershed PROJECT MAP# PROJECT NAME OR DESCRIPTION IEPA CATEGORY BMP TYPE LANDOWNERS PARTNERS 1 Headwaters Conservation Area Nonpoint Other Education(signage) Campton Township Source Education 2 North Street Bioswales Urban Bioswales Village of Elburn Consultant Other Education(signage) 3 Prairie Park Nonpoint Source Education Other Education(signage) Village of Elburn 4 Mirador Park Nonpoint Source Education Other Education(signage) Batavia Park District Homeowners association 5 Oak Hill Pond Shoreline Stabilization Hydrologic Shoreline Protection Homeowners association Village of North Aurora &Buffer Establishment Other Buffer Zone Enhancement/Installation 6 Hankes Road Bioswales Urban Bioswales Sugar Grove Township Prestbury Citizens Assoc., Consultant 7 Lake Blackberry Shoreline Stabilization Hydrologic Shoreline Protection Prestbury Citizens Assoc. Consultant &Buffer Establishment Other Buffer Zone Installation 8 Lake Prestbury Buffer Establishment Other Buffer Zone Installation Prestbury Citizens Assoc. Consultant &Shoreline Stabilization Hydrologic Shoreline Protection 9 Hankes Creek Stabilization& Hydrologic Streambank Protection Prestbury Citizens Assoc. Consultant Buffer Establishment Urban Urban Filter Strip 10 Mossfield Right of Way Natural Area Restoration Urban Natural Area Restoration Prestbury Citizens Assoc. 11 Walnut Lane Natural Area Restoration Urban Natural Area Restoration Prestbury Citizens Assoc. 12 Stuart Sports Complex BMPs for Runoff Reduction Hydrologic Wetland Restoration Fox Valley Park District Consultant &Water Quality Benefits Urban Naturalized Wet Detention,Naturalized Dry Detention,Bioswales,Permeable Pavers, Natural Area Restoration Other Education(signage) 13 Jericho Lake Park BMPs for Runoff Reduction Urban Bio-retention Facility,Bioswales, Fox Valley Park District Co &Water Quality Benefits Permeable Pavers,Natural Area Restoration, Revegetated Riparian Zone/Corridor (stream buffer) Hydrologic Shoreline Protection Other Education(signage) 12 BLACKBERRY CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN Education and Outreach Research shows that a watershed plan will have a higher level of long-term support and Throughout the watershed planning process,the stakeholder group discussed the need success if stakeholders are involved in creating and implementing the plan.Through for education and outreach.To continue the momentum from the planning process,the the course of this planning process,several outreach efforts were completed including stakeholder group is considering the formation of a"Watershed Coalition"to oversee the publishing of two brochures and one poster,two open houses to inform the public plan implementation.The coalition will be best served by hiring a watershed coordinator, about the watershed plan,and a networking event hosted by the Fox River Ecosystem a position that may potentially be funded by the governmental entities in the watershed. Partnership(FREP)in which participants toured restoration sites in the Dick Young The watershed coordinator will provide a focused,local approach to watershed plan Forest Preserve in Kane County.Additionally,The Conservation Foundation created a implementation,taking into consideration regional activities and opportunities.A slide show presentation that was used to communicate the planning process to municipal summary of education/outreach recommendations follows: staff,boards,and committees.Awebsite describing the watershed planning process and i.The Watershed Coalition will partner with existing organizations to provide a other relevant resources has been hosted by FREP at http://foxriverecoustem.org/ Section Sig grant writingworkshop to assist lead implementers with applications. blackberry.htm. z.The Watershed Coalition will work with partnering organizations to raise awareness about all potential sources of fecal coliform bacteria in Blackberry Creek and its tributaries. 3.The Watershed Coalition will target landowners and homeowners'associations, especially those identified in the critical areas analysis for fecal coliform bacteria, about proper septic maintenance and warning signs of a failing system. 4.The Watershed Coalition will distribute U.S.EPA's Healthy Lawn care Practices and Reduce Runoff.Slow it Down,Spread it Out,Soak it In!DVDs to homeowners associations for use at meetings as an educational tool. ' 5.The Watershed Coalition will continuously work with municipalities to promote the use of the CMAP Model Water Use Conservation Ordinance in their respective municipalities. The Coalition will seek to maintain the current Blackberry Creek Watershed Plan website hosted by FREP as one of the tools to achieve the above five objectives.Additional tools include brochures,interpretive signs,and public service announcements as well as activities for targeted audiences such as classroom curricula,presentations for homeowners associations,and technical workshops for developers and land use planners on development practices that have minimal adverse impacts on water quality. Figure 6. FREP Noon Network participants spreading prarie plant seed at Dick Young Forest Preserve, Kane County(May 2011). PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS 13 Expected Water Quality Benefits and Costs Timeline and Implementers Sediment or total suspended solids(TSS),total phosphorus,total nitrogen,and fecal A five-year schedule for plan implementation was developed for each recommendation coliform load reductions were calculated as applicable for each short-term BMP project. category(Policy and Planning,Projects,Education and Outreach)with the assumption Conceptual level engineering cost estimates were based on information available on the that the Plan will be updated every five years.It should be noted that implementation proposed BMP projects,typical design components required for such projects,and unit of projects and programs is based on a variety of factors including,but not limited to, cost information available from other,recently implemented projects in northeastern securing appropriate funding,receiving participation from willing landowners and local Illinois.The results are summarized in the tables below. governments,and availability of technical assistance resources. Table S.Short-term project benefits organized by category In addition to short-term projects,the watershed plan also describes numerous policy IEPA PROJECT SEDIMENT TSS PHOSPHORUS NITROGEN FECAL COLIFORM recommendations.Identified parties are encouraged to consider and implement the CATEGORY (tons/yr) (Ibs/yr) (Ibs/yr) (Ibs/yr) (counts/year) Plan's policy recommendations within five years from plan adoption.To help facilitate Hydrolog 51 476 1W 86 209 3E+11 these efforts,CMAP,other organizations,and consultants can provide assistance to - communities for those recommendations that are related to comprehensive planning, Other W 11 71,360 704 259 2E+12 codes and ordinances for water resource protection(e.g.,Model Water Use Conservation Urban 0 313 15 A+ Ordinance),conservation design,and stormwater best management practices. Totals 62 110,094 1,242 483 3E+12 Implementation of the outreach and education recommendations will be an ongoing effort among partnering organizations,agencies,local governments,businesses, homeowners associations,and other groups that are active within the watershed.It is Table 6:Short-term project costs encouraged that the Blackberry Creek Watershed Coalition(successor organization IEPA PROJECT CATEGORY ACCUMULATIVE COST OF SHORT-TERM PROJECTS facilitated by the services of awatershed coordinator)will continue to work with Hydrologi $211,879 watershed communities to support these efforts. Other $4,003,309 Urban $45,946 Additional Information Needs Total $4,261,133 Subbasin-specific water quality and pollutant loading data do not exist for Blackberry Creek.To address this gap in information,this watershed plan relies heavily on modeling results to estimate pollutant loads within the watersheds. By 2o16,a monitoring system should be implemented throughout the Blackberry Creek Watershed that captures water quality conditions at adequate spatial and temporal resolutions.Stakeholders can partner with the Fox River Study Group(FRSG)and Illinois State Water Survey(ISWS)to develop a more robust water quality monitoring scheme with a goal of achieving an improved understanding of the sources of fecal coliform within the watershed.After such monitoring data are collected and analyzed,the source of contamination in terms of origin(s)and geographic location(s)should be better understood.Watershed stakeholders can then reevaluate the Plan's recommendations and make appropriate adjustments to priorities at that point. 14 BLACKBERRY CREEK WATERSHED ACTION PLAN Acknowledgments This project was made possible by Section 604(b)of the Clean Water Act,as amended, and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,Bureau of Water,which distributed funds to the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning(CMAP).CMAP,the regional planning agency for the seven counties of northeastern Illinois and the delegated authority for the region's areawide water quality management plan,led the planning process.Support was also provided by The Conservation Foundation and the Fox River Ecosystem Partnership. This planwas prepared for the Blackberry Creek Watershed Coalition that formed at the beginning of the planning process.The many contributors to this planning process include the Cities of Aurora,Batavia,and Yorkville;Villages of Elburn,Montgomery, North Aurora,and Sugar Grove;Kane County Development,Environment,Water Resoures,Transportation,and Health Departments/Divisions and Forest Preserve District;the Kendall County Planning and Transportation Departments and Forest Preserve District;the Kane-DuPage and Kendall County Soil&Water Conservation Districts;Blackberry,Campton,and Sugar Grove Townships;Sugar Grove Water Authority;Waubonsee Community College;Cannonball Trail Civic League;Prestbury Citizens Association;Batavia,Fox Valley,Geneva,and Sugar Grove Park Districts;Illinois DNR;and local consultants. About CMAP The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning(CMAP)is the region's official comprehensive planning organization.Its GO TO 2040 planning campaign is helping the region's seven counties and 284 communities to implement strategies that address transportation,housing,economic development,open space,the environment,and other quality of life issues.See www.cmap.illinois.gov for more information. c 1.' `° k , .:- -. •'. it A _ f _ .►_ - = _ _ _ - - - _ e . _ _ r , �.- ,. • _ w µ `a-. ..� ,`_ _.. .' s. ✓' Cam° °« r _4 -J - �. _ r..w+' 'u�, w f. >-.y _1 ,fix _ : '. ` ° `�=sd' - - •.-f-• - `* rte,. _ J _ter _� .. J.`— �! _ _ I i 4 �tid� ° r-•,�, � � � ,y 1-_ I' `X-f LL �r � n `` _ may°' .L r_- _ �y. Yellow-headed blackbird courtesy of Bob Andrini,Kane County Audubon. `➢mss ?�� Chicago tro Agency f la , 233 Sou Wacker e 8 ., Chic g ,JL60 254 040 @cmap.illinois. w.cm- .illinois. d ` r 3' i / _ '~'��, /,i - '� 4 4T.� - �',! f s• 'a 'rte. ,,. y + l r� A f' t .OW r 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� a► Legal ❑ CA#5 W36 El El Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator El r� �! �© Consultant El PS 2012-15 Chief of Police ■ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Resolution Adopting the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting and Date: City Council —July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Chief of Police Hart Police Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid 1s36 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: July 18, 2012 C<wrMY Sad �LE 14 Subject: Kendall County Hazard Mitigation Plan Summary Adoption of the Kendall County Hazard Mitigation Plan. Background This item was last discussed at the July I Oth Committee of the Whole meeting. At that meeting, the City Council pointed out that several of the names of individuals listed in the report were out-of-date. Per direction, staff sought to get a corrected copy from Kendall County. Upon speaking with the County's Emergency Management Coordinator, staff was informed that the City is to adopt the plan as is. This particular plan, word-for-word, has been filed with the state and federal authorities in 2011 as required by law. Accordingly, each participating agency is then required to adopt the plan, as is. The most important component of the plan is that each name listed is accompanied by that person's job title. It is understood that names will change over time. The next scheduled update of the plan will be in 2016. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the Kendall County Hazard Mitigation Plan. RESOLUTION NO. 2012- ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the United City of Yorkville hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Management Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK Resolution No.2012- Page 1 CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING LARRY KOT JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2012. MAYOR Resolution No.2012- Page 2 c� Jo Oaoiess Stephenson Unnebago Done McHenry Lake Carroll Ogle Dekalb Kane Gupage Cook Vlhiteside Lee ok Island Bureau VUII Henry La Salle Me roe r Orund y Harr irk Kankakee Multi- d e a P I� al fialn Plan Iroquois Ford Ftw Tazew ell 3n ck Oonough Fulton Mclean K Schuyler Logan Champaign an Dew ai itt Chat n 4krrrilion Adams Brown Cass Menard Piatt Ma con Morgan Sangamon Douglas Pike Scott Mou Edgar krie Ch ristian Coles Greene Shelby Mawupin Mantgomery rrberiand qa rk Ca h Jerse;r Nlla Effingham Fayette Jasper i}awford Bond dison Clay Pichland wrence Clinton hdarion St.Clair lllr3;me ba Vlhshington Jef#erson Edru rds Monroe Randolph Perry Harrilton White Franklin Jackson Gallatin'' VUlliamson Saline Lin n Hardin hnsan Pope p Alex�de ulas ssac The Polis Center Kendall County Sheriff's Southern Illinois University IUPUI Office Carbondale 1200 Waterway Boulevard 1102 Cornell Lane Department of Geology Suite 100 Yorkville,IL 60560 Sou them 206 Parkinson Laboratory Indianapolis,IN 46202 Carbondale Carbondale,IL 62901 Do—aewm Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Kendall County, Illinois Adoption Date: -- -- Primary Point of Contact Joseph T. Gillespie EMA Coordinator Kendall County Sheriffs Office 1102 Cornell Lane Yorkville, IL 60560 Phone: 630-533-7500 Fax: 630-553-1972 E-mail: JGillespie@co.kendall.il.us Secondary Point of Contact Tracy Page Executive Assistant to the Chief Deputy Phone: 630-533-7500 ext. 1115 Fax: 630-553-1972 e-mail: tpagekco.kendall.il.us Prepared by: Department of Geology Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois 62901 and The Polls Center 1200 Waterway Boulevard, Suite 100 Indianapolis, IN 46202 317-274-2455 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 2 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table of Contents Section 1 - Public Planning Process..............................................................................................5 1.1 Narrative Description..........................................................................................................5 1.2 Planning Team Information...............................................................................................5 1.3 Public Involvement in Planning Process ...........................................................................6 1.4 Neighboring Community Involvement..............................................................................7 1.5 Review of Technical and Fiscal Resources........................................................................7 1.6 Review of Existing Plans.....................................................................................................8 Section 2 -Jurisdiction Participation Information......................................................................9 2.1 Adoption by Local Governing Body..................................................................................9 2.2 Jurisdiction Participation...................................................................................................9 Section3 -Jurisdiction Information...........................................................................................10 3.1 Topography........................................................................................................................10 3.2 Climate................................................................................................................................11 3.3 Demographics ....................................................................................................................11 3.4 Economy.............................................................................................................................12 3.5 Industry..............................................................................................................................12 3.6 Land Use and Development Trends.................................................................................14 3.7 Major Lakes, Rivers, and Watersheds............................................................................15 Section4 -Risk Assessment.........................................................................................................25 4.1 Hazard Identification/Profile .........................................................................................25 4.1.1 Existing Plans..............................................................................................................25 4.1.2 National Hazard Records...........................................................................................25 4.1.3 Hazard Ranking Methodology..................................................................................27 4.1.4 GIS and HAZUS-MH................................................................................................30 4.2 Vulnerability Assessment................................................................................................31 4.2.1 Asset Inventory..........................................................................................................31 4.2.1.2 Essential Facilities List...........................................................................................32 4.2.1.3 Facility Replacement Costs....................................................................................32 4.3 Future Development........................................................................................................33 4.4 Hazard Profiles................................................................................................................34 4.4.1 Tornado Hazard........................................................................................................34 4.4.2 Flood Hazard .............................................................................................................42 4.4.3 Earthquake Hazard....................................................................................................51 4.4.4 Thunderstorm Hazard...............................................................................................62 4.4.5 Winter Storm Hazard................................................................................................69 4.4.6 Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard............................................73 Section5 -Mitigation Strategy....................................................................................................86 5.1 Community Capability Assessment.................................................................................86 5.1.1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)............................................................86 5.1.2 Stormwater Management Stream Maintenance Ordinance.................................87 5.1.3 Zoning Management Ordinance..............................................................................87 5.1.4 Erosion Management Program/ Policy ...................................................................88 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 3 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 5.1.5 Fire Insurance Rating Programs/ Policy.................................................................88 5.1.6 Land Use Plan............................................................................................................88 5.1.7 Building Codes...........................................................................................................89 5.2 Mitigation goals .................................................................................................................89 5.3 Mitigation Actions/Projects..............................................................................................89 5.4 Implementation Strategy and Analysis of Mitigation Projects.....................................91 5.5 Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Strategy........................................................................98 Section6 - Plan Maintenance......................................................................................................99 6.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan ............................................................99 6.2 Implementation through Existing Programs..................................................................99 6.3 Continued Public Involvement.........................................................................................99 Appendix A: Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Minutes..............................................103 Appendix B: Local Newspaper Articles and Photographs.....................................................121 Appendix C: Adopting Resolutions ..........................................................................................123 AppendixD: NCDC Historical Hazards ..................................................................................136 Appendix E: Historical Hazard Maps......................................................................................155 Appendix F: Complete List of Critical Facilities.....................................................................156 Appendix G: Map of Critical Facilties................................................................173 Appendix H: USGS Stream Gauge Data.............................................................174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 4 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Section 1 - Public Planning Process 1.1 Narrative Description Hazard mitigation is defined as any sustained action to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to human life and property from hazards. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has made reducing hazards one of its primary goals; hazard mitigation planning and the subsequent implementation of resulting projects, measures, and policies is a primary mechanism in achieving FEMA's goal. The Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (MHMP) is a requirement of the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000). The development of a local government plan is required in order to maintain eligibility for certain federal disaster assistance and hazard mitigation funding programs. In order for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) communities to be eligible for future mitigation funds, they must adopt an MHMP. In recognition of the importance of planning in mitigation activities, FEMA created Hazards USA Multi-Hazard (HAZUS-MH), a powerful geographic information system (GIS)-based disaster risk assessment tool. This tool enables communities of all sizes to predict estimated losses from floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, and other related phenomena and to measure the impact of various mitigation practices that might help reduce those losses. The Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) has determined that HAZUS-MH should play a critical role in Illinois's risk assessments. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale (SIUC) and the Polis Center (Polis) at Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) are assisting Kendall County planning staff with performing the hazard risk assessment. 1.2 Planning Team Information The Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Team is headed by Terry Tichava, who is the primary point of contact. Members of the planning team include representatives from various county departments, cities and towns, and public and private utilities. Table 1-1 identifies the planning team individuals and the organizations they represent. In December 2010, Terry Tichava retired and EMA Coordinator Joseph T. Gillespie replaced him. Table 1-1: Multi Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Members Name Title Organization Jurisdiction Stan Laken Technology Director Kendall County Kendall County Dave Farris Director KenCom 911 Emergency Kendall County Communications Terry Tichava Chief Deputy and EMA Kendall County Sheriff Kendall County Director Department and Kendall County Jerry A. Dudgeon Director Kendall County Planning, Kendall County Building,and Zoning Joe Gillespie EMA Director Kendall County Sheriff Kendall County Department Tracy Page Executive Assistant Kendall County Sheriff Kendall County Department and Kendall County Jeff Spang Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection Kendall County Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 5 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Name Title Organization Jurisdiction District Jonathan Whowell LT Plano Police Department City of Plano Bill King Chief Sandwich Fire Department City of Sandwich Rich Hart Chief Yorkville Police Department The United City of Yorkville Michael Hitzemann Chief Bristol-Kendall Fire Department The United City of Yorkville Jackie Lemmerhirt-Kowalski Mayor of Millbrook Village of Millbrook Village of Millbrook Lowell Mathre Newark Fire Department Village of Newark Jim Jensen Captain Oswego Police Department Village of Oswego Villages of Oswego and Jeff Warren Lieutenant Oswego Fire Protection District Montgomery and Boulder Hill CDP William Dostor Chief Plainfield Police Department Village of Plainfield John Konopek Commander Plainfield Police Department Village of Plainfield Lynette Bergeron Assistant Director ommu nicat cions Emergency C Village of Plattville Commuat The Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) planning regulations stress that planning team members must be active participants. The Kendall County MHMP committee members were actively involved on the following components: • Attending the MHMP meetings • Providing available GIS data and historical hazard information • Reviewing and providing comments on the draft plans • Coordinating and participating in the public input process • Coordinating the formal adoption of the plan by the county An MHMP kickoff meeting was held at the Kendall County Sheriff's Office on March 10, 2010. Representatives from Southern Illinois University explained the rationale behind the MHMP program and answered questions from the participants. The SIUC also provided an overview of HAZUS-MH, described the timeline and the process of the mitigation planning project, and presented Kendall County with a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for sharing data and information. The Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee met on March 10, 2010, April 14, 2010, June 9, 2010, August 11, 2010 and October 13, 2010. Each meeting was approximately two hours in length. The meeting minutes are included in Appendix A. During these meetings, the planning team successfully identified critical facilities, reviewed hazard data and maps, identified and assessed the effectiveness of existing mitigation measures, established mitigation projects, and assisted with preparation of the public participation information. 1.3 Public Involvement in Planning Process An effort was made to solicit public input during the planning process, and a public meeting was held on June 9, 2010 to review the county's risk assessment. Appendix A contains the minutes from the public meeting. Appendix B contains articles published by the local newspaper throughout the public input process. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 6 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 1.4 Neighboring Community Involvement The Kendall County planning team invited participation from various representatives of county government, local city and town governments, community groups, local businesses, and universities. The team also invited participation from adjacent counties to obtain their involvement in the planning process. Details of neighboring stakeholders' involvement are summarized in Table 1-2. Table 1-2: Neighboring Community Participation Person Participating Neighboring Jurisdiction Organization Participation Description DeKalb County Invited to participate in public Dennis J. Miller,Coordinator DeKalb County Emergency Services and meeting,reviewed the plan and Disaster Agency provide comments. Dupage County Office of Invited to participate in public Norman Sturm, Director Dupage County Homeland Security and meeting,reviewed the plan and Emergency Management provide comments. Kane County Office of Invited to participate in public Don Bryant Kane County meeting,reviewed the plan and Emergency Management provide comments. Grundy County Invited to participate in public Jim Lutz,Director Grundy County Emergency Management meeting,reviewed the plan and Agency provide comments. Will County Emergency Invited to participate in public Harold Damron, Director Will County Management meeting,reviewed the plan and provide comments. 1.5 Review of Technical and Fiscal Resources The MHMP planning team has identified representatives from key agencies to assist in the planning process. Technical data, reports, and studies were obtained from these agencies. The organizations and their contributions are summarized in Table 1-3. Table 1-3: Key Agency Resources Provided Agency Name Resources Provided Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Illinois 2008 Section 303(d)Listed Waters and watershed maps U.S.Census County Profile Information,e.g.Population and Physical Characteristics Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity Community Profiles Illinois Department of Employment Security Industrial Employment by Sector NOAA National Climatic Data Center Climate Data Illinois Emergency Management Agency 2007 Illinois Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Illinois Water Survey(State Climatologist Office) Climate Data United States Geological Survey Physiographic/Hill Shade Map,Earthquake Information, Hydrology Illinois State Geological Survey Geologic,Karst Train, Physiographic Division and Coal Mining Maps Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 7 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 1.6 Review of Existing Plans Kendall County and its local communities utilized a variety of planning documents to direct community development. These documents include land use plans, comprehensive plans, emergency response plans, municipal ordinances, and building codes. The planning process also incorporated the existing natural hazard mitigation elements from previous planning efforts. Table 1-4 lists the plans, studies, reports, and ordinances used in the development of the plan. Table 1-4: Planning Documents Used for MHMP Planning Process Author(s) Year Title Description Where Used Kendall County Describes the NFIP program,which FEMA 2009 Flood Insurance communities participates; provide regulatory Sections 4 and 5 Study floodplain maps Supervisor of 2009 GIS Database Parcel and Assessor Data For Kendall Section 4 Assessments County. State of Illinois This plan provides an overview of the Guidance on hazards Emergency 2007 Illinois Natural process for identifying and mitigating natural and mitigation measures 2007 Hazard Mitigation and background on Management Plan hazards in Illinois as require by the Disaster historical disasters in Plan Mitigation Act of 2000. Illinois. Kendall County The Comprehensive Resource Management Kendall County 2009 Resource plan is intended to provide guidance for Section 3;Land Use and Management future development in the Kendall County for Development Plans Concept Plan the next five to ten years. The Comprehensive Plan is intended to Village of Village of Oswego Section 3;Land Use and Oswego 2009 Comprehensive Plan provide guidance for future development in Development Plans Village of Oswego. DeKalb County 2003 Land Use Plan,City The Land Use Plan is intended to guide Section 3;Land Use and Government of Sandwich future development in the City of Sandwich. Development Plans United City of Kendall County Land The Comprehensive Plan is intended to Section 3;Land Use and Yorkville 2008 Resource provide guidance for future development in Development Plans Management Plan Yorkville. Village of Plainfield Village of Plainfield The Future Land Use Plan is intended to Section 3;Land Use and Community 2007 Future Land Use guide future development in the Village of Development Plans Development Plan Plainfield.. Department Village of The Land Use Plan is intended to guide Village of Montgomery Land Section 3;Land Use and Montgomery 2010 Use Development future development in the Village of Development Plans Plan Montgomery City of Plano 2005 Draft Future Land The Land Use Plan is intended to guide Section 3;Land Use and Use Plan future development in the City of Plano. Development Plans The Comprehensive Plan is intended to Village of Village of Minooka, Section 3;Land Use and Minooka 2005 Comprehensive Plan provide guidance for future development in Development Plans Village of Minooka. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 8 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Section 2 - Jurisdiction Participation Information The incorporated communities included in this multi jurisdictional plan are listed in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: Participating Jurisdictions Jurisdiction Name Kendall County Boulder Hill CDP City of Plano City of Sandwich The United City of Yorkville Village of Lisbon Village of Millbrook Village of Montgomery Village of Newark Village of Oswego Village of Plattville 2.1 Adoption by Local Governing Body The draft plan was made available on October 13, 2010 to the planning team for review. Comments were then accepted. The Kendall County hazard mitigation planning team presented and recommended the plan to the County Commissioners, who adopted it on <date adopted>. Resolution adoptions are included in Appendix C of this plan. 2.2 Jurisdiction Participation It is required that each jurisdiction participates in the planning process. Table 2-2 lists each jurisdiction and describes its participation in the construction of this plan. Table 2-2: Jurisdiction Participation Jurisdiction Name Participating Member Participation Description Kendall County Terry Tichava MHMP planning team member Boulder Hill CDP Jeff Warren MHMP planning team member City of Aurora Mike Doerzaph MHMP planning team member City of Plano Lt.Jonathan W. Howell MHMP planning team member City of Sandwich William R.King MHMP planning team member The United City of Yorkville Dave Delaney MHMP planning team member Village of Montgomery Jeff Warren MHMP planning team member Village of Newark Lowell Mathre MHMP planning team member Village of Oswego James Jensen MHMP planning team member All members of the MHMP planning committee were actively involved in attending the MHMP meetings, providing available Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data and historical hazard information, reviewing and providing comments on the draft plans, coordinating and participating in the public input process, and coordinating the county's formal adoption of the plan. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 9 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Section 3 - Jurisdiction Information Kendall County was formed from LaSalle and Kane Counties in 1841. It was named after Amos Kendall who became the U.S. Postmaster General in 1835 and was an important advisor to President Andrew Jackson. The United City of Yorkville is the county seat. Kendall County is located in the northeastern portion of Illinois. The county has total land area of 323 square miles. It is bordered by Kane County in the north, DuPage County in the northeast, Will County in the east, Grundy County in the south, LaSalle County in the west, DeKalb County in the northwest. Figure 3-1 depicts Kendall County's location. Figure 3-1: Kendall County, Illinois ntgomer qurara older Hill __j PC Pte- - `` !oswego -- r 'Plano Legend piano � I � ,� _ State or U S Highway Sandwich Local Road r Yorkville - �� Railroad Streams r< � Lakes ;rl, Municipalities 79 I M Ilington Nreuva Z - 1 `1 _ , Kendall County .-_.� Miles 0 50 100 200 - Minooka: 0 2.5 5 10 Miles Sources:http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/departments/archives/irad/Kendall.html; http://www.fedstats.gov/gf/states/17000.html;http://f`actfinder.census.gov;http://www.genealogytrails.com 3.1 Topography Kendall County is situated in the Central Lowland Province of the Till Plains Section. The northwestern part of the county is within the Bloomington Ridged Plain physiographic division, and the southeastern part of the county is within the Kankakee Plain physiographic division. The Bloomington Ridged Plain includes most of the Wisconsin Moraines, which are characterized by low, broad concentric ridges with intervening wide stretches of relatively flat or gently Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 10 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 undulating ground moraine. The Kankakee Plain is a level to gently rolling plain. The origin of this physiographic division is believed to be fluviolacustrine. The landforms commonly found on in this division include low moraine islands, glacial terraces, bars, and dunes. Figure 3-2 shows the major physiographic divisions in Kendall County and surrounding region. Figure 3-2 Physiographic Division in vicinity of Kendall County Legend PhysiographicRegmns r • Counties a Kendall County • i • • • ■ r of +,t Miles =M iles 0 2.5 5 10 15 20 0 25 50 100 150 200 oau sauces.inns cearpnc sn•ev.minas oewmem w nawra Resources.nmas oeoartmem a nanscar�ion 3.2 Climate Kendall County climate is typical of northern Illinois. The variables of temperature, precipitation, and snowfall can vary greatly from one year to the next. Winter temperatures can fall below freezing starting as early as September and extending as late as May. Based on National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) normals from 1971 to 2000, the average winter low is 10.5° F and the average winter high is 34.9° F. In summer, the average low is 55.7° F and average high is 84.2° F. Average annual precipitation is 38.39 inches throughout the year. 3.3 Demographics In 2000, Kendall County had a population of 54,544. According to American FactFinder (2008), Kendall County experienced a large population increase which almost doubled the population to 103,460 in 2008. The population is spread throughout 9 townships: Big Grove, Bristol, Fox, Kendall, Lisbon, Little Rock, Na-Au-Say, Oswego, and Seward. The largest community in Kendall County is Oswego, which had a population of approximately 13,326 in 2000. The breakdown of population by township is included in Table 3-1. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 11 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 3-1: Population by Township Township 2000 Population %of County Big Grove 1,526 2.80 Bristol 7,677 14.07 Fox 1,257 2.30 Kendall 4,636 8.50 Lisbon 851 1.56 Little Rock 7,662 14.05 Na-Au-Say 1,672 3.07 Oswego 28,417 52.10 Seward 846 1.55 Source:American FactFinder, 2000 3.4 Economy American FactFinder reported for 2000 that 83.5% of the workforce in Kendall County was employed in the private sector. The breakdown is included in Table 3-2. Manufacturing represents the largest sector, employing approximately 18.5% of the workforce. The 2000 annual per capita income in Kendall County is $25,188. Table 3-2: Industrial Employment by Sector Industrial Sector %Dist.In County (2000) Agriculture,forestry,fishing,hunting,and mining 1.3 Construction 9.0 Manufacturing 18.5 Wholesale trade 4.1 Retail trade 11.8 Transportation,warehousing and utilities 5.7 Information 2.7 Finance,insurance,real estate,and rental/leasing 8.5 Professional,technical services 8.2 Educational services,health care,and social assistance 16.3 Arts,entertainment,recreation 6.0 Public administration 3.5 Source:American FactFinder,2000 3.5 Industry Kendall County's major employers and number of employees are listed in Table 3-3. The largest employer is Caterpillar, which was established in circa 1930 and has approximately 2,200 employees. The Menard Distribution Center is the second largest nongovernmental employer, with 1,100 employees. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 12 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 3-3: Major Employers Company Name City/Town Year #of Employees Type of Business Established Manufacturing Plano Molding Plano 610 Plastic Manufacturing Fox Valley Molding Plano 140 Plastic Manufacturing Radiac Abrasives Oswego 1997 200 Industrial Abrasives, Diamond Cutting Robb Container Yorkville 80 Plastic Containers Wrigley Manufacturing Company Yorkville 355 Manufacturing Avtec Industries Oswego 1970 155 Food Service Equipment Manufacturing Catepillar Tractor Co. Oswego 1958 3200 Heavy Equipment Manufacturing Health Care Tillers Healthcare Oswego 1972 120 Nursing Home Hillside Healthcare Yorkville 90 Nursing Home Rush-Copley Healthcare Center Yorkville 100 Health Care Center Schools All Public Schools County Wide 1,600 Education • Oswego School Oswego 432 Education District • Oswegoland Park Oswego 1950 107 Education/Recreation District Other Menards Distribution Center County-wide 1,100 Building and Home Hardware Supplies Wal-Mart County-wide 520 Retail Fox River Foods Montgomery 395 Food Service Distributor Amuro Confections Yorkville 370 Bulk Candy Supplier Jewel/Osco County Wide 160 Super Markets Kendall County Yorkville 1841 260 County Government YMCA Plano 150 Human Services Seaboard Seed Montgomery 100 Agriculture AT&T Plano 80 Telecommunications Newleyweds Foods Yorkville 110 Food Service Distributor Raging Waves Water Park Yorkville 450 Entertainment Super Target Yorkville 175 Retail Kohls County-wide 120 Retail Source:Kendall County Planning Team Commuter Patterns According to American FactFinder information from 2000, approximately 29,697 of Kendall County's population are in the work force. The average travel time from home to work is 29.9 minutes. Figure 3-3 depicts the commuting patterns for Kendall County's labor force. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 13 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 3-3: Commuter Patterns for Kendall County ■Car,truck,or Wan--drove 1.1°1 4.8°f alone 2.1% ■Car,truck,or van-- carpooled ■Public transportation (excluding taxicab) ■Walked ■Other means ■Worked at home 3.6 Land Use and Development Trends Agriculture is the predominant land use in Kendall County with approximately 80% of the land used as pasture or for growing crops. Other significant land uses include manufacturing, commercial, residential, and tourism. Kendall County is home to several spacious parks for fishing, camping, hiking, and water sports. The parks include Yorkville Prairie Nature Preserve, Maramech Woods Nature Preserve, Houses Grove Forest Preserve, Saw Wee Kee Park, and Silver Springs State Park. Figure 3-4 shows the land cover throughout Kendall County. Figure 3-4: Kendall County Land Cover m 25 926 ]1 9] 4 Legend n Water =Developed-High intensity F-7 Mixed Forest Woody Wetlands 0 Developed-open Bpace ®RONEO AClap Grassland —Wetlands Developed-LM Intensity -Deciduous Forest Pasture L.._i Municipalities �� o -Developed-Medium Intensity -Evergreen Forest —Crops —State end U 6.High ey. —Roads s M Iles U 2.6 6 10 eei:USCS Il.il—1 L. l-over Da Set.301:Ii Roads Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 14 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Kendall County is one of the fasting developing counties in the United States. The County and nearly all of incorporated communities (Oswego, Plano, Minooka, Montgomery, Plainfield, Sandwich, and Yorkville) have either a comprehensive or a future land use plan (see Table 1-4). The purpose of these plans is to provide guidance for future development. Each plan calls for no development in floodplains and carefully considers placement of residential space in relation to industrial and commercial land uses. Figures 3-5 through 3-12 shows the planned land use in each these jurisdictions. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 15 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 3-5: Future Land Use Map for Kendall County KENDALL COUNTY • F • r� — ACS'+NVOKIL!SUD THARE&I nUBLIRBAN R HIDENTIhL .. .. R � ?ykl47kMMxW�c�AI!Va.rxw.l�i�+tR!'QM1ia+GU•�v� r I KUM REslkigKILAL .. - l _ " .4as¢^au.sce«rreso-aaouw�' 'A_ 1 -. © 1%n Urra�r�eD,13E iW. i L. S9t5lJN MYSOt RA EALLYEW r - �� WJID USE BUSIRBS r h# I} r 7 r ¢, .1i __ e TkkvaP[)RThTK)N MR:R�Lx I- PL:RLIGIm ITLrrK3xkL - RURAL 5E7 04ENTS r. PA4TL.RAL REPOURCEAREA.$ IL w 1 _ a Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 16 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 3-6: Future Land Use Map for City of Plano -_.- - KAN I � J A I- t, 1= - - r S 0 d i LEGEND 0 Agricultural M Transit Oriented Development 0 Estate Residential(0 to.5 DU/AC) Alternate Location for potential 0 Low Density Residential(.5 to 2.25 DU/ACI Transit Oriented Development = Medium Density Residential(2.26 to 6 DUPAQ D See City Center Plan for detailed area 0 High Density Residential(6DU/AC+) ••••• Plano School District 88 RecreationlPark Municipal Boundary •...+ ..• Plano Planning Area D Conservation/Private open space THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM ® Public/Institutional M Industrial/Office/Research Existing exo�ose Primary Arterial ■�r = General Business Secondary Arterial .=■ City Center Mixed Use Primary Collector .-. — Secondary Collector --- Proposed Grade --, Separated Crossing ij DRAFT FUTURE LAND USE ® a _000,pg Comprehensive Plan... Plano,Illinois- AP 2W5 L!l �a Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 17 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 3-7: Future Land Use Map for City of Sandwich [T -------- -- --- --- ---- ------ nil Rd ---------�... ------ ------- --- -------- ---.. -, - � a � I N C i r i i i 1 we�^ Od c IAiIIIh Rd 4750th Rd wawxrna�m . 3� S __ Rod rs Rtl 4859M Rtl 49N Rtl P¢" 6 455CN Rd Sandwich Future Land Use Plan 45h Rd 5n re ��f'dmc 4451M.�Rd fMpozcE Reud: _�. Snxn hms o 4� tarn Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 18 of 174 NMI A kip - of La 1 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 3-9: Future Land Use Map for Village of Minooka i ,. .. u �...... ........ — m f' y , iRE III QRA4 PNK ........ - _ .... - . �r LLL y._.3.......,v.... ... JiLt7 , :f 3 - !I �r:4� o I• ��•b � r. . `-,��y Mu.lYill 9�11 My MA4 kl e........... , e r o Z � o .ilk '_'• - ��a�ia Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 20 of 174 • 1 • . • • . • - • • • • Village of Montgomery 2010 Comprehensive Land Use Development Plan In OR��■�.�II�I■.� �� 1�llPlh._- 1^-1f"��f i at e II y i�if� ■■ + QL r ar • J `.: _:. se.= ��i�i•...Ili � _ — �.1 r ' I xl F 1 .r - •i Vil[age of ntgomery IL MO _ Ili g . '4 a J_�:!rQ,."■ L��L fi M t KF� _� h ��'^ ��G�i�llil��ifl1'■■L " � �� • 1 � i r1� FBI a R17 to HIM Mar � x�� •rwK •�r�' -� • .�a ' f� ter. 1, Aim, A ' * ■ Rall IF 1 1 , h • X111 JIIIL17 -■��k��1 •h IN e • � resimat AMA" r.lf:�"ice■■ � .r II � �� ..' �. �} I ■ -'IL: �I an LMr rr a- 11 —. ir.r F INrr Ali IN - Ad � Ell E.M1 - Li Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 3.7 Major Lakes, Rivers, and Watersheds Kendall County has a number of bodies of water including Lake Plano, Beaver Lake, Millhurst Lake, and Loon Lake. According to the USGS, Kendall County consists of two drainage basins: the Lower Fox (HUC 7120007) and the Upper Illinois (HUC 7120005). Figure 3-14 shows the location of the major water bodies and watersheds in Kendall County. Figure 3-14: Major water bodies and watersheds in Kendall County Keno Cwnly Montgomery Aurorae �0 Bould Witt � 47 _, 34 Legend Oswego Lakes r,. �� o Y ill na�courc, Rivers $a ch 34 Municipalities HUCs Major Roads a 126 Des Pfaines HUC �d,aue tunr; a c Millington 47 Joliet L N rk x w+f" 52 w 52 bon 47 Minooka J1 Lower Fox HUC - S Upper 11knois HUC Grundy County ®Mires 0 0,5 1 2 3 4 o zs so roa rso zoo Pia Seux IAners Gea�w Swey iMrs CeE,vrrcnr:M Flamal Reamrns rlems OepanmeM M Tranzpatarien Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 24 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Section 4 - Risk Assessment The goal of mitigation is to reduce the future impacts of a hazard including loss of life, property damage, disruption to local and regional economies, and the expenditure of public and private funds for recovery. Sound mitigation must be based on sound risk assessment. A risk assessment involves quantifying the potential loss resulting from a disaster by assessing the vulnerability of buildings, infrastructure, and people. This assessment identifies the characteristics and potential consequences of a disaster, how much of the community could be affected by a disaster, and the impact on community assets. A risk assessment consists of three components—hazard identification, vulnerability analysis, and risk analysis. 4.1 Hazard Identification/Profile 4.1.1 Existing Plans The plans identified in Table 1-3 did not contain a risk analysis. These local planning documents were reviewed to identify historical hazards and help identify risk. To facilitate the planning process, flood data for the Federal and State Government were used for the flood analysis. 4.1.2 National Hazard Records 4.1.2.1 National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) Records To assist the planning team, historical storm event data was compiled from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). NCDC records are estimates of damage reported to the National Weather Service from various local, state, and federal sources. However, these estimates are often preliminary in nature and may not match the final assessment of economic and property losses related to given weather events. The NCDC data included 202 reported events in Kendall County between May 27, 1954 and the October 31, 2009 (the most updated information as of the date of this plan). A summary table of events related to each hazard type is included in the hazard profile sections that follow. A full table listing all events, including additional details, is included as Appendix D. In addition to NCDC data, Storm Prediction Center (SPC) data associated with tornadoes, strong winds, and hail were plotted using SPC recorded latitude and longitude. These events are plotted and included as Appendix E. The list of NCDC hazards is included in Table 4-1. Table 4-1: Climatic Data Center Historical Hazards Hazard Tornadoes Severe Thunderstorms Drought/Extreme Heat Winter Storms Flood/Flash flood Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 25 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 4.1.2.2 FEMA Disaster Information Since 1965 there have been 55 Federal Disaster Declarations for the state of Illinois. Emergency declarations allow states access to FEMA funds for Public Assistance (PA); disaster declarations allow for even more PA funding including Individual Assistance (IA) and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). Kendall County has received federal aid for both PA and IA funding for seven declared disasters since 1965. Figure 4-1 depicts the disasters and emergencies that have been declared for Kendall County since 1965. Table 4-2 lists more specific information for each declaration that has occurred since 1965. Figure 4-1: FEMA-Declared Emergencies and Disasters in Kendall County (1965-present) Jo Davie.u E2erhenaon V"(1111"11 90 Boa-ie McHenry Lake Carroll Ogle De KalI, Kane -ru Page Cooks N4iteside Lee Kendall Rock Id+and Bureau VMI Hemp La Salle Mercer Grundy Putnam Stark Kankakee Marshall Knox: Henderson Vlk%rren Livingston I P"a V"bodford -- Iroquois Ford Han k cDonough Fu �,. Taxevrell McLean Sdiuyl actin Logan De'Ni4 Champaign v¢rmiiiroi ,ate am s 'Bro,:�,n Menard Piatt Macon Morgan Sangamon Douglas ik Smtt;� Moultrie — Eder Christian Coles G n Shdhy Macoupn Montgomery umhetland Clark Cal un rs Fayette Effingham r Jasper CraWord adi n Bond Clay Richland Lawrence Clinton Marian -lair V10yne ftbash VI@� ing<m Edv�ards Monroe Jefferson I Randolph Per Hamilton Mte 1 Count of FEMA Declared Disasters Franklin by County 1965-2009 JaJs ri VMliamson Saline Gallatin,..// 1-3 Hardin Union Jnhn,on 4-6 Pope 7 9 PulasA:i Ple>r�ridei Massac 0 10-12 13-15 _ 16-18 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 26 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-2: FEMA-Declared Emergencies in Kendall County(1965-present) Date of Incident Date of Declaration Declaration Disaster Description Type of Number Assistance April 27, 1973 373 Severe Storms and Flooding June 10, 1974 438 Severe Storms and Flooding August 28, 1990 August 31,1990 878 Tornadoes July 17, 1996 July 18, 1996 1129 Severe Storms and Flooding January 1, 1999 January 8, 1999 3134 Winter Snow Storm Public Dec. 10-31,2000 January 17,2000 3161 Severe Winter Storm Public Nov.30-Dec. 1,2006 Dec.29,2006 1800 Snow Public Sept. 13-Oct.5,2008 Oct.3,2008 373 Severe Storms and Flooding Public 4.1.3 Hazard Ranking Methodology Based on planning team input, national datasets, and existing plans, Table 4-3 lists the hazards Kendall County will address in this multi-hazard mitigation plan. In addition, these hazards ranked the highest based on the Risk Priority Index discussed in section 4.1.4. Table 4-3: Planning Team Hazard List Hazard Thunderstorms/High Winds/Hail/Lightning Tornado Transportation Hazardous Material Release Flood Winter Storms Fire/Explosion Earthquakes 4.1.4 Calculating the Risk Priority Index The first step in determining the Risk Priority Index (RPI) was to have the planning team members generate a list of hazards which have befallen or could potentially befall their community. Next, the planning team members were asked to assign a likelihood rating based on the criteria and methods described in the following table. Table 4-4 displays the probability of the future occurrence ranking. This ranking was based upon previous history and the definition of hazard. Using the definitions given, the likelihood of future events is "Quantified" which results in the classification within one of the four "Ranges" of likelihood. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 27 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-4: Future Occurrence Ranking Probability Characteristics Event is probable within the calendar year. 4-Highly Likely Event has up to 1 in 1 year chance of occurring.(1/1=100°/x) History of events is greater than 33%likely per year. Event is probable within the next three years. 3-Likely Event has up to 1 in 3 years chance of occurring. (1/3=33%) History of events is greater than 20%but less than or equal to 33%likely per year. Event is probable within the next five years. 2-Possible Event has up to 1 in 5 years chance of occurring.(1/5=20%) History of events is greater than 10%but less than or equal to 20%likely per year. Event is possible within the next ten years. 1 -Unlikely Event has up to 1 in 10 years chance of occurring.(1/10=10%) History of events is less than or equal to 10%likely per year. Next, planning team members were asked to consider the potential magnitude/severity of the hazard according to the severity associated with past events of the hazard. Table 4-5 gives four classifications of magnitude/severity. Table 4-5: Hazard Magnitude Magnitude/Severity Characteristics Multiple deaths. 8-Catastrophic Complete shutdown of facilities for 30 or more days. More than 50%of property is severely damaged. Injuries and/or illnesses result in permanent disability. 4-Critical Complete shutdown of critical facilities for at least 14 days. More than 25%of property is severely damaged. Injuries and/or illnesses do not result in permanent disability. 2-Limited Complete shutdown of critical facilities for more than seven days. More than 10%of property is severely damaged. Injuries and/or illnesses are treatable with first aid. 1 -Negligible Minor quality of life lost. Shutdown of critical facilities and services for 24 hours or less. Less than 10%of property is severely damaged. Finally, the RPI was calculated by multiplying the probability by the magnitude/severity of the hazard. Using these values, the planning team member where then asked to rank the hazards. Table 4-6 identifies the RPI and ranking for each hazard facing Kendall County. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 28 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-6: Kendall County Hazards (RPI) Hazard Probability Magnitude/Severity Risk Priority Rank Index Thunderstorms/High Winds/Hail/Lightning 4-Highly Likely 2-Limited 8 1 Tornado 3-Likely 2-Limited 6 2 Transportation Hazardous Material Release 3-Likely 2-Limited 6 3 Flooding 4-Highly Likely 1 -Negligible 4 4 Winter Storms 3-Likely 1 -Negligible 3 5 Fire/Explosion 2-Possible 1 -Negligible 2 6 Earthquake 1 -Unlikely 2-Limited 2 7 4.1.5 Jurisdictional Hazard Ranking Because the jurisdictions in Kendall County differ in their susceptibilities to certain hazards—for example, The United City of Yorkville which is located on the Fox River floodplain is more likely to experience significant flooding than Lisbon or Joliet which are located on the uplands outside of any large stream's or river's floodplain which could potentially cause significant flooding—the hazards identified by the planning team were ranked by SIUC for each individual jurisdiction using the methodology outlined in Section 4.1.4. The SIUC rankings were based on input from the planning team members, available historical data, and the hazard modeling results described within this hazard mitigation plan. During the five-year review of the plan this table will be updated by the planning team to ensure these jurisdictional rankings accurately reflect each community's assessment of these hazards. Table 4-7 lists the jurisdictions and their respective hazard rankings (Ranking 1 being the highest concern). Table 4-7: Hazard Rankings by Jurisdiction Hazard Jurisdiction Tornado HAZMAT Earthquake Thunderstorms Flooding Winter Storms Fire/Explosion City of 2 3 7 1 6 4 5 Aurora* Boulder Hill 2 3 7 1 4 5 6 CDP* City of Joliet* 2 3 7 1 6 4 5 Village of 2 3 7 1 6 4 5 Lisbon* Village of 2 3 7 1 4 5 6 Millington* Village of 2 3 7 1 6 4 5 Minooka' Village of 2 3 7 1 4 5 6 Newark Village of 2 3 7 1 4 5 6 Oswego Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 29 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Hazard Jurisdiction Tornado HAZMAT Earthquake Thunderstorms Flooding Winter Storms Fire/Explosion City of Plano 1 4 7 3 2 6 5 City of Sandwich 2 3 7 1 4 5 6 The United City of 1 3 7 2 4 5 6 Yorkville Hazard ranking was completed by SIUC for this jurisdiction 4.1.6 GIS and HAZUS-MH The third step in this assessment is the risk analysis, which quantifies the risk to the population, infrastructure, and economy of the community. Where possible, the hazards were quantified using GIS analyses and HAZUS-MH. This process reflects a Level 2 approach to analyzing hazards as defined for HAZUS-MH. The approach includes substitution of selected default data with local data. This process improved the accuracy of the model predictions. HAZUS-MH generates a combination of site-specific and aggregated loss estimates depending upon the analysis options that are selected and the input that is provided by the user. Aggregate inventory loss estimates, which include building stock analysis, are based upon the assumption that building stock is evenly distributed across census blocks/tracts. Therefore, it is possible that overestimates of damage will occur in some areas while underestimates will occur in other areas. With this in mind, total losses tend to be more reliable over larger geographic areas than for individual census blocks/tracts. It is important to note that HAZUS-MH is not intended to be a substitute for detailed engineering studies. Rather, it is intended to serve as a planning aid for communities interested in assessing their risk to flood-, earthquake-, and hurricane-related hazards. This documentation does not provide full details on the processes and procedures completed in the development of this project. It is only intended to highlight the major steps that were followed during the project. Site-specific analysis is based upon loss estimations for individual structures. For flooding, analysis of site-specific structures takes into account the depth of water in relation to the structure. HAZUS-MH also takes into account the actual dollar exposure to the structure for the costs of building reconstruction, content, and inventory. However, damages are based upon the assumption that each structure will fall into a structural class, and structures in each class will respond in a similar fashion to a specific depth of flooding or ground shaking. Site-specific analysis is also based upon a point location rather than a polygon, therefore the model does not account for the percentage of a building that is inundated. These assumptions suggest that the loss estimates for site-specific structures as well as for aggregate structural losses need to be viewed as approximations of losses that are subject to considerable variability rather than as exact engineering estimates of losses to individual structures. The following events were analyzed. The parameters for these scenarios were created through GIS, HAZUS-MH, and historical information to predict which communities would be at risk. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 30 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Using HAZUS-MH 1. 100-year overbank flooding 2. Earthquake scenarios Using GIS 1. Tornado 2. Hazardous material release 4.2 Vulnerability Assessment 4.2.1 Asset Inventory 4.2.1.1 Processes and Sources for Identifying Assets The HAZUS-MH data is based on best available national data sources. The initial step involved updating the default HAZUS-MH data using State of Illinois data sources. At Meeting #1, the planning team members were provided with a plot and report of all HAZUS-MH critical facilities. The planning team took GIS data provided by SIUC-Polis; verified the datasets using local knowledge, and allowed SIUC-Polis to use their local GIS data for additional verification. SIUC GIS analysts made these updates and corrections to the HAZUS-MH data tables prior to performing the risk assessment. These changes to the HAZUS-MH inventory reflect a Level 2 analysis. This update process improved the accuracy of the model predictions. The default HAZUS-MH data has been updated as follows: • The HAZUS-MH defaults, critical facilities, and essential facilities have been updated based on the most recent available data sources. Critical and essential point facilities have been reviewed, revised, and approved by local subject matter experts at each county. • The essential facility updates (schools, medical care facilities, fire stations, police stations, and EOCs) have been applied to the HAZUS-MH model data. HAZUS-MH reports of essential facility losses reflect updated data. Kendall County provided SIUC with parcel boundaries and county Assessor records. Records without improvements were deleted. The parcel boundaries were converted to parcel points located in the centroids of each parcel boundary. Each parcel point was linked to an Assessor record based upon matching parcel numbers. The generated building inventory points represent the approximate locations (within a parcel) of building exposure. The parcel points were aggregated by census block. • The aggregate building inventory tables used in this analysis have not been updated. Default HAZUS-MH model data was used for the earthquake. • For the flood analysis, user-defined facilities were updated from the building inventory information provided by Kendall County. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 31 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Parcel-matching results for Kendall County are listed in Table 4-8. Table 4-8: Parcel-Matching for Kendall County Data Source Count Assessor Records 53,498 County-Provided Parcels 53,498 Assessor Records with Improvements 40,234 Matched Parcel Points 40,234 The following assumptions were made during the analysis: • The building exposure for flooding, tornado, and HAZMAT is determined from the Assessor records. It is assumed that the population and the buildings are located at the centroid of the parcel. • The building exposure for earthquake used HAZUS-MH default data. • The algorithm used to match county-provided parcel point locations with the Assessor records is not perfect. The results in this analysis reflect matched parcel records only. The parcel-matching results for Kendall County are included in Table 4-8. • Population counts are based upon 2.5 persons per household. Only residential occupancy classes are used to determine the impact on the local population. If the event were to occur at night, it would be assumed that people are at home (not school, work, or church). • The analysis is restricted to the county boundaries. Events that occur near the county boundaries do not contain damage assessments from adjacent counties. 4.2.1.2 Essential Facilities List Table 4-9 identifies the essential facilities that were added or updated for the analysis. Essential facilities are a subset of critical facilities. A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. Table 4-9: Essential Facilities List Facility Number of Facilities Care Facilities 2 Emergency Operations Centers 1 Fire Stations 13 Police Stations 7 Schools 45 4.2.1.3 Facility Replacement Costs Facility replacement costs and total building exposure are identified in Table 4-10. The replacement costs have not been updated by local data. Table 4-10 also includes the estimated number of buildings within each occupancy class. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 32 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-10: Building Exposure General Occupancy Estimated Total Buildings Total Building Exposure (X 1000) Agricultural 186 $32,461 Commercial 1,136 $610,725 Education 45 $34,942 Government 21 $15,967 Industrial 477 $239,889 Religious/Non-Profit 67 $47,585 Residential 20,646 $3,622,430 Total 22,563 $4,603,999 4.3 Future Development As the county's population continues to grow, the residential and urban areas will extend further into the county, placing more pressure on existing transportation and utility infrastructure while increasing the rate of farmland conversion; Kendall County will address specific mitigation strategies in Section 5 to alleviate such issues. Because Kendall County is vulnerable to a variety of natural and technological threats, the county government—in partnership with state government—must make a commitment to prepare for the management of these types of events. Kendall County is committed to ensuring that county elected and appointed officials become informed leaders regarding community hazards so that they are better prepared to set and direct policies for emergency management and county response. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 33 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 4.4 Hazard Profiles 4.4.1 Tornado Hazard Hazard Definition for Tornado Hazard Tornadoes pose a great risk to Illinois and its citizens. Tornadoes can occur at any time during the day or night. They can also happen during any month of the year. The unpredictability of tornadoes makes them one of the state's most dangerous hazards. Their extreme winds are violently destructive when they touch down in the region's developed and populated areas. Current estimates place the maximum velocity at about 300 miles per hour, but higher and lower values can occur. A wind velocity of 200 miles per hour will result in a wind pressure of 102.4 pounds per square foot of surface area—a load that exceeds the tolerance limits of most buildings. Considering these factors, it is easy to understand why tornadoes can be so devastating for the communities they hit. Tornadoes are defined as violently-rotating columns of air extending from thunderstorms to the ground. Funnel clouds are rotating columns of air not in contact with the ground; however, the violently-rotating column of air can reach the ground very quickly and become a tornado. If the funnel cloud picks up and blows debris, it has reached the ground and is a tornado. Tornadoes are classified according to the Fujita tornado intensity scale. The tornado scale ranges from low intensity FO with effective wind speeds of 40 to 70 miles per hour to F5 tornadoes with effective wind speeds of over 260 miles per hour. The Fujita intensity scale is described in Table 4-11. Table 4-11: Fujita Tornado Rating Fujita Number Estimated Path Width Path Length Description of Destruction Wind Speed Light damage,some damage to chimneys,branches 0 Gale 40-72 mph 6-17 yards 0.3-0.9 miles broken,sign boards damaged,shallow-rooted trees blown over. Moderate damage,roof surfaces peeled off,mobile 1 Moderate 73-112 mph 18-55 yards 1.0-3.1 miles homes pushed off foundations,attached garages damaged. Considerable damage,entire roofs torn from frame 2 Significant 113-157 mph 56-175 yards 3.2-9.9 miles houses,mobile homes demolished,boxcars pushed over, large trees snapped or uprooted. Severe damage,walls torn from well-constructed 3 Severe 158-206 mph 176-566 yards 10-31 miles houses,trains overturned,most trees in forests uprooted, heavy cars thrown about. Complete damage,well-constructed houses leveled, 4 Devastating 207-260 mph 0.3-0.9 miles 32-99 miles structures with weak foundations blown off for some distance,large missiles generated. Foundations swept clean,automobiles become 5 Incredible 261-318 mph 1.0-3.1 miles 100-315 miles missiles and thrown for 100 yards or more,steel- reinforced concrete structures badly damaged. Source:NOAA Storm Prediction Center Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 34 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Previous Occurrences for Tornado Hazard There have been several occurrences of tornadoes within Kendall County during the past few decades. The NCDC database reported 14 tornadoes/funnel clouds in Kendall County since 1954. The most recent recorded event occurred on July 27, 2003, during a chain of thunderstorms. The tornado touched down near the Hideaway Lake Camp near Yorkville, Illinois. Kendall County NCDC recorded tornadoes are identified in Table 4-12. Additional details for NCDC events are included in Appendix D. Table 4-12: Kendall County Tornadoes* Location or Date Type Magnitude Deaths Injuries Property Crop County Damage Damage Kendall County 5/27/1954 Tornado F2 0 0 25K 0 Kendall County 9/26/1959 Tornado F1 0 0 25K 0 Kendall County 4/6/1972 Tornado F1 0 0 25K 0 Kendall County 3/12/1976 Tornado F3 0 0 2.5M 0 Kendall County 6/30/1977 Tornado F 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 6/30/1977 Tornado F 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 4/27/1984 Tornado F3 0 0 2.51VI 0 Kendall County 6/5/1989 Tornado FO 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 8/28/1990 Tornado F5 0 0 2.5M 0 Lisbon 8/5/1995 Funnel Cloud N/A 0 0 0 0 Bristol 5/28/2003 Tornado FO 0 0 0 0 Millington 5/30/2003 Tornado FO 0 0 0 0 Millington 5/30/2003 Tornado FO 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 7/27/2003 Tornado FO 0 0 0 0 * NCDC records are estimates of damage compiled by the National Weather Service from various local, state, and federal sources. However, these estimates are often preliminary in nature and may not match the final assessment of economic and property losses related to a given weather event. Geographic Location for Tornado Hazard The entire county has the same risk for occurrence of tornadoes. They can occur at any location within the county. Hazard Extent for Tornado Hazard The historical tornadoes generally moved from southwest to northeast across the county. The extent of the hazard varies both in terms of the extent of the path and the wind speed. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 35 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Risk Identification for Tornado Hazard Based on historical information, the occurrence of future tornadoes in Kendall County is likely. Tornadoes with varying magnitudes are expected to happen. According to the RPI, tornadoes ranked as the number two hazard. RPI=Probability x Magnitude/Severity. _ Probability x Magnitude/Severity RPI 3 x 2 = 6 Vulnerability Analysis for Tornado Hazard Tornadoes can occur within any area in the county; therefore, the entire county population and all buildings are vulnerable to tornadoes. To accommodate this risk, this plan will consider all buildings located within the county as vulnerable. The existing buildings and infrastructure in Kendall County are discussed in Table 4-10. Critical Facilities All critical facilities are vulnerable to tornadoes. A critical facility will encounter many of the same impacts as any other building within the jurisdiction. These impacts will vary based on the magnitude of the tornado but can include structural failure, damaging debris (trees or limbs), roofs blown off or windows broken by hail or high winds, and loss of facility functionality(e.g. a damaged police station will no longer be able to serve the community). Table 4-9 lists the types and numbers of all of the essential facilities in the area. A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. Building Inventory The building exposure in terms of types and numbers of buildings for the entire county is listed in Table 4-10. The buildings within the county can all expect the same impacts, similar to those discussed for critical facilities. These impacts include structural failure, damaging debris (trees or limbs), roofs blown off or windows broken by hail or high winds, and loss of building function (e.g. damaged home will no longer be habitable causing residents to seek shelter). Infrastructure During a tornado the types of infrastructure that could be impacted include roadways, utility lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since the county's entire infrastructure is equally vulnerable, it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become damaged during a tornado. The impacts to these items include broken, failed, or impassable roadways, broken or failed utility lines (e.g. loss of power or gas to community), and railway failure from broken or impassable railways. Bridges could fail or become impassable causing risk to traffic. An example scenario is described as follows to gauge the anticipated impacts of tornadoes in the county, in terms of numbers and types of buildings and infrastructure. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 36 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 GIS overlay modeling was used to determine the potential impacts of an F4 tornado. The analysis used a hypothetical path based upon the F4 tornado event that ran for 18 miles southwest to northeast across the County impact portions of The United City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego. The selected widths were modeled after a recreation of the Fujita-Scale guidelines based on conceptual wind speeds,path widths, and path lengths. There is no guarantee that every tornado will fit exactly into one of these six categories. Table 4-13 depicts tornado damage curves as well as path widths. Table 4-13: Tornado Path Widths and Damage Curves Fujita Scale Path Width(feet) Maximum Expected Damage 5 2,400 100% 4 1,800 100% 3 1,200 80% 2 600 50% 1 300 10% 0 150 0% Within any given tornado path there are degrees of damage. The most intense damage occurs within the center of the damage path with decreasing amounts of damage away from the center. After the hypothetical path is digitized on a map the process is modeled in GIS by adding buffers (damage zones) around the tornado path. Figure 4-2 and Table 4-14 describe the zone analysis. The selected hypothetical tornado path is depicted in Figure 4-3, and the damage curve buffers are shown in Figure 4-4. Figure 4-2: F4 Tornado Analysis Using GIS Buffers Zone 4: 10%expected damage 900 feet Zone 3: 50%expected damage 600 feet Zane 2: Pr 80%expected damage 300 feet one V 100°f expected damage An F4 tornado has four damage zones, depicted in Table 4-10. Total devastation is estimated within 150 feet of the tornado path. The outer buffer is 900 feet from the tornado path, within which buildings will experience 10% damage. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 37 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-14: F4 Tornado Zones and Damage Curves Zone Buffer(feet) Damage Curve 1 0-150 100% 2 150-300 80% 3 300-600 50% 4 600-900 10% Figure 4-3: Hypothetical F4 Tornado Path in Kendall County Legend Tornado Track 30 ur Roads Montgomery !BouldeYR1Il- _ Interstate zs, as _ J��lr _ - Highway 31 �— Railroads Yorkville''°' - Stream or River sa 0 Lake or Pond Municipalities 71 le 128 71 r on 47 lief N r 62 0 Minook. N Miles 0 2.5 5 10 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 38 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 4-4: Modeled F4 Tornado Damage Buffers in Kendall County Legend + Damaged Building -Zone 9 _ + ,;,. •+••• Roads -Zone ..N� �..: • '• , Interstate -7one3 - - �MM�••�• 47} �• _ Highway Zone 4 ,• •• -- -- Railroads Lake or Pond Yorkville • • r- -Stream or River 0 Municipalities �8 ! Mlles 0 025 05 1 § sa ao� _ our• w ,V S c� u !R. Mlles cw 0 025 0.5 1 The results of the analysis are depicted in Tables 4-15 and 4-16. The GIS analysis estimates that 1,560 buildings will be damaged. The estimated building losses were $140.4 million. The building losses are an estimate of building replacement costs multiplied by the percentages of damage. The overlay was performed against parcels provided by Kendall County that were joined with Assessor records showing property improvement. The Assessor records often do not distinguish parcels by occupancy class if the parcels are not taxable. For purposes of analysis, the total number of buildings and the building replacement costs for government, religious/non-profit, and education should be lumped together. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 39 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-15: Estimated Numbers of Buildings Damaged by Occupancy Type Occupancy Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Residential 250 244 462 485 Commercial 7 1 19 19 Industrial 3 3 3 3 Agriculture 2 6 4 4 Religious/Nonprofit 0 0 0 0 Government 8 6 15 9 Education 0 2 1 4 Total 270 262 504 524 Table 4-16: Estimated Building Losses by Occupancy Type (X 1000) Occupancy Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Residential $44,993,622 $34,226,789 $42,899,607 $9,269,148 Commercial $913,707 $103,632 $1,188,435 $215,663 Industrial $398,091 $830,357 $275,624 $44,399 Agriculture $151,968 $685,862 $341,763 $84,955 Religious/Nonprofit $0 $0 $0 $0 Government $0 $0 $0 $0 Education $0 $2,400,000 $750,000 $600,000 Total $46,457,388 $38,246,640 $45,455,429 $10,214,165 Critical Facilities Damage There are 36 critical facilities located within 900 feet of the hypothetical tornado path. The affected facilities are identified in Table 4-17, and their geographic locations are shown in Figures 4-5. Table 4-17: Estimated Essential Facilities Affected Name Fire Stations Little Rock Fire Station#2 School Facilities Churchill Elementary School Millbrook Junior High School Oswego East High School Circle Center Grade School Yorkville Intermediate School Southbury Elementary School Karl Plank Junior High School Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 40 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 4-5: Essential Facilities within Tornado Path in Kendall County 3 X47! 1 Yorkville �dpaJM f Legend • ❑amagetl Building -zone 1 126 ap. °Roatls -Zone 2 i �Mle.rate ®Zone 3 -Highway Zone 4 ftaAraatls I Lie or Pond -•°} -9ream or River 0 Muricipalltles 0 0.25 0.5 1 III os Oamagad Flre.Station j Bemagaa schod 0 a 25 as 1 Wles 71 ET AMA -� os go . c R� 1 ! 71, _fix^ a 0 025 05 1 vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Tornado Hazard The entire population and buildings have been identified as at risk because tornadoes can occur anywhere within the state, at any time of the day, and during any month of the year. Furthermore, any future development in terms of new construction within the county will be at risk. The building exposure for Kendall County is included in Table 4-10. All critical facilities in the county and communities within the county are at risk. A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. Analysis of Community Development Trends Preparing for severe storms will be enhanced if officials sponsor a wide range of programs and initiatives to address the overall safety of county residents. New structures need to be built with more sturdy construction, and those structures already in place need to be hardened to lessen the potential impacts of severe weather. Community warning sirens to provide warnings of approaching storms are also vital to preventing the loss of property and ensuring the safety of Kendall County residents. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 41 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 4.4.2 Flood Hazard Hazard Definition for Flooding Flooding is a significant natural hazard throughout the United States. The type, magnitude, and severity of flooding are functions of the amount and distribution of precipitation over a given area, the rate at which precipitation infiltrates the ground, the geometry and hydrology of the catchment, and flow dynamics and conditions in and along the river channel. Floods can be classified as one of two types: upstream floods or downstream floods. Both types of floods are common in Illinois. Upstream floods, also called flash floods, occur in the upper parts of drainage basins and are generally characterized by periods of intense rainfall over a short duration. These floods arise with very little warning and often result in locally intense damage, and sometimes loss of life, due to the high energy of the flowing water. Flood waters can snap trees, topple buildings, and easily move large boulders or other structures. Six inches of rushing water can upend a person; another 18 inches might carry off a car. Generally, upstream floods cause damage over relatively localized areas, but they can be quite severe in the local areas in which they occur. Urban flooding is a type of upstream flood. Urban flooding involves the overflow of storm drain systems and can be the result of inadequate drainage combined with heavy rainfall or rapid snowmelt. Upstream or flash floods can occur at any time of the year in Illinois, but they are most common in the spring and summer months. Downstream floods, sometimes called riverine floods, refer to floods on large rivers at locations with large upstream catchments. Downstream floods are typically associated with precipitation events that are of relatively long duration and occur over large areas. Flooding on small tributary streams may be limited, but the contribution of increased runoff may result in a large flood downstream. The lag time between precipitation and time of the flood peak is much longer for downstream floods than for upstream floods, generally providing ample warning for people to move to safe locations and, to some extent, secure some property against damage. Riverine flooding on the large rivers of Illinois generally occurs during either the spring or summer. Hazard Definition for Dam and Levee Failure Dams are structures that retain or detain water behind a large barrier. When full or partially full, the difference in elevation between the water above the dam and below creates large amounts of potential energy, creating the potential for failure. The same potential exists for levees when they serve their purpose, which is to confine flood waters within the channel area of a river and exclude that water from land or communities land-ward of the levee. Dams and levees can fail due to either 1) water heights or flows above the capacity for which the structure was designed; or 2) deficiencies in the structure such that it cannot hold back the potential energy of the water. If a dam or levee fails, issues of primary concern include loss of human life/injury, downstream property damage, lifeline disruption (of concern would be transportation routes and utility lines required to maintain or protect life), and environmental damage. Many communities view both dams and levees as permanent and infinitely safe structures. This sense of security may well be false, leading to significantly increased risks. Both downstream of dams and on floodplains protected by levees, security leads to new construction, added Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 42 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 infrastructure, and increased population over time. Levees in particular are built to hold back flood waters only up to some maximum level, often the 100-year (1% annual probability) flood event. When that maximum is exceeded by more than the design safety margin, the levee will be overtopped or otherwise fail, inundating communities in the land previously protected by that levee. It has been suggested that climate change, land-use shifts, and some forms of river engineering may be increasing the magnitude of large floods and the frequency of levee failure situations. In addition to failure that results from extreme floods above the design capacity, levees and dams can fail due to structural deficiencies. Both dams and levees require constant monitoring and regular maintenance to assure their integrity. Many structures across the U.S. have been under- funded or otherwise neglected, leading to an eventual day of reckoning in the form either of realization that the structure is unsafe or, sometimes, an actual failure. The threat of dam or levee failure may require substantial commitment of time, personnel, and resources. Since dams and levees deteriorate with age, minor issues become larger compounding problems, and the risk of failure increases. Previous Occurrences for Flooding The NCDC database reported 17 flood events in Kendall County since 1996. One of the most recent significant events occurred during September 2008. The remnants of hurricane Ike moved across northern Illinois producing the second round of heavy rain in a 24 hour period. The heavy rain amounted to 6 to 11 inches across northern Illinois caused extensive and widespread flooding. Total property damage from this event was estimated at $2 million. Kendall County NCDC recorded floods are identified in Table 4-18. Additional details for NCDC events are included in Appendix D. Table 4-18: Kendall County Previous Occurrences of Flooding* Location or County Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Crop Damage Damage Kendall County 7/17/1996 Flash Flood 0 0 1.5M 0 Northern Illinois 2/20/1997 Flood 1 0 0 0 Kendall County 7/10/2000 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 Plano 7/27/2003 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 Central 5113/2004 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/30/2004 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 Plano 6112/2004 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 Northern Illinois 1/13/2005 Flood 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 10/2/2006 Flood 0 0 0 0 Oswego 3/1/2007 Flood 0 0 0 0 Oswego 3/1/2007 Flood 0 0 0 0 Oswego 3/31/2007 Flood 0 0 0 0 Oswego 7/18/2007 Flood 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 8/23/2007 Flood 0 0 0 0 Little Rock 9/14/2008 Flash Flood 0 0 2.OM 0 Little Rock 9/14/2008 Flood 0 0 0 0 Oswego 12/27/2008 Flash Flood 0 0 0 0 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 43 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 * NCDC records are estimates of damage compiled by the National Weather Service from various local, state, and federal sources. However, these estimates are often preliminary in nature and may not match the final assessment of economic and property losses related to a given weather event. Previous Occurrences for Dam and Levee Failure According to the Kendall County planning team, there are no records or local knowledge of any dam or certified levee failure in the county. Repetitive Loss Properties FEMA defines a repetitive loss structure as a structure covered by a contract of flood insurance issued under the NFIP, which has suffered flood loss damage on two occasions during a 10-year period that ends on the date of the second loss, in which the cost to repair the flood damage is 25% of the market value of the structure at the time of each flood loss. The Illinois Emergency Management Agency(IEMA) was contacted to determine the location of repetitive loss structures. Table 4-19 lists 2009 data for damages to these repetitive loss structures. Table 4-19: Kendall County Repetitive Loss Structures Jurisdiction Occupancy Type Number of Structures Number of Losses Kendall County Single Family 9 21 Kendall County Other Residence 1 5 City of Joliet Single Family 16 37 City of Plano Non Residential 2 7 The United City of Yorkville Other Residential 1 2 Village of Millington Single Family 1 2 Village of Plainfield Single Family 2 4 Geographic Location for Flooding Most river flooding occurs in early spring and is the result of excessive rainfall and/or the combination of rainfall and snowmelt. Severe thunderstorms may cause flooding during the summer or fall, but tend to be localized. The primary source of river flooding in Kendall County is the Wabash River. Flash floods, brief heavy flows in small streams or normally dry creek beds, also occur within the county. Flash flooding is typically characterized by high-velocity water, often carrying large amounts of debris. Urban flooding involves the overflow of storm drain systems and is typically the result of inadequate drainage following heavy rainfall or rapid snowmelt. DFIRM was used to identify specific stream reaches for analysis. The areas of riverine flooding are depicted on the map in Appendix E. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service provides information from gauge locations at points along various rivers Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 44 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 across the United States. For Kendall County, one gage is located on the Fox River at Montgomery. Historic flood levels for this gage are provided in Appendix F. Geographic Location for Dam and Levee Failure HAZUS-MH identified three dams in Kendall County. The maps in Appendix F illustrate the locations of Kendall County dams. All three of these dams are low hazard dams (L) and they do not have an Emergency Action Plan (EAP). Table 4-20 summarizes the dam information. Table 4-20: National Inventory of Dams Dam Name River Hazard EAP Milhurst Lake Dam Tributary to the Fox River L No Yorkville Dam Fox River L No Black Berry Creek Dam Black Berry Creek L No A review of the United States Army Corps of Engineers and local records revealed no certified levees within Kendall County. * The dams and levees listed in this multi-hazard mitigation plan are recorded from default HAZUS-MH data. Their physical presences were not confirmed;therefore,new or unrecorded structures may exist.A more complete list of locations is included in Appendix F. Hazard Extent for Flooding The HAZUS-MH flood model is designed to generate a flood depth grid and flood boundary polygon by deriving hydrologic and hydraulic information based on user-provided elevation data or by incorporating selected output from other flood models. HAZUS-MH also has the ability to clip a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) with a user-provided flood boundary, thus creating a flood depth grid. For Kendall County, HAZUS-MH was used to extract flood depth by clipping the DEM with the DFIRMs Base Flood Elevation (BFE) boundary. The BFE is defined as the area that has a 1% chance of flooding in any given year. Planning team input and a review of historical information provided additional information on specific flood events. Hazard Extent for Dam and Levee Failure When dams are assigned the low (L) hazard potential classification, it means that failure or incorrect operation of the dam will result in no human life losses and no economic or environmental losses. Losses are principally limited to the owner's property. Dams assigned the significant (S) hazard classification are those dams in which failure or incorrect operation results in no probable loss of human life; however it can cause economic loss, environment damage, and disruption of lifeline facilities. Dams classified as significant hazard potential dams are often located in predominantly rural or agricultural areas, but could be located in populated areas with a significant amount of infrastructure. Dams assigned the high (H) hazard potential classification are those dams in which failure or incorrect operation has the highest risk to cause loss of human life and significant damage to buildings and infrastructure. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 45 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 According to default HAZUS-MH data, the three dams in Kendall County are low hazard and do not have Emergency Action Plans (EAP). An EAP is not required by the State of Illinois but is strongly recommended by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Accurate mapping of the risks of flooding behind levees depends on knowing the condition and level of protection the levees actually provide. FEMA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are working together to make sure that flood hazard maps clearly reflect the flood protection capabilities of levees, and that the maps accurately represent the flood risks posed to areas situated behind them. Levee owners—usually states, communities, or in some cases private individuals or organizations—are responsible for ensuring that the levees they own are maintained according to their design. In order to be considered creditable flood protection structures on FEMA's flood maps, levee owners must provide documentation to prove the levee meets design, operation, and maintenance standards for protection against the one-percent-annual chance flood. Risk Identification for Flood Hazard Based on historical information and the HAZUS-MH flooding analysis results, future occurrence of flooding in Kendall County is highly likely. According to the Risk Priority Index (RPI), flooding is ranked as the number four hazard. RPI=Probability x Magnitude/Severity. Probability x Magnitude = RPI /Severity 4 x 1 = 4 Risk Identification for Dam/Levee Failure Based on operation and maintenance requirements and local knowledge of the dams in Kendall County, the occurrence of a dam or levee failure is unlikely. However, if a high hazard dam were to fail, the magnitude and severity of the damage could be great. The warning time and duration of the dam failure event would be very short. Based on input from the planning team, the risk of dam and levee failure is insignificant, and dam and levee failure was not ranked as a risk. HAZUS-MH Analysis Using 100-Year Flood Boundary and County Parcels HAZUS-MH generated the flood depth grid for a 100-year return period by clipping the USGS 1/3 Arc-second (approximately 10-meter raster cell size) Digital Elevation Model (DEM) to the Kendall County flood boundary. Next, HAZUS-MH utilized a user-defined analysis of Kendall County with site-specific parcel data provided by the county. HAZUS-MH estimates the 100-year flood would damage 439 buildings with building related flood losses totaling approximately $32.1 million. The total estimated numbers of damaged buildings are given in Table 4-21. Figure 4-6 depicts the Kendall County parcel points that fall within the 100-year floodplain. Figure 4-7 highlights damaged buildings within the floodplain areas in urban areas. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 46 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-21: Kendall County HAZUS-MH Building Damage General Occupancy Number of Buildings Damaged Total Building Damage(x1000) Residential 247 $19,751,262 Commercial 17 $1,513,378 Industrial 0 $0 Agricultural 71 $10,830,106 Government\Non-Profit 104 $0 Education 0 $0 Total 439 $32,094,746 Figure 4-6: Kendall County Buildings in Floodplain (100-Year Flood) • .`� 7 mor,Altimery • 3U `7. asp IT— I 3y Plarm _ 1 rkwil I �R28 v� e7 `-- ollst IN 52 -- Legend — _- - -- 47 • Damaged Buiding 52 _ ,. Mlnooka i 00-Yea r Flood Boundary - i Miles 21 5 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 47 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 4-7: Kendall County Flood-Prone Urban Areas (100-Year Flood) - 0 0.5 _ 2 3 52 �Rti Miles -5 Millingto r+,e= Lisbon I Newark ' 0 0.2 0.4- - 0.8 1.2 Miles Montgomery ` urara } I _ - - t we o Plan V - rkVille ? EPldwlch - - 0 0.5 1 2 '14ri IMiles i Legend s' 77fi I Damaged Building -5 3 6 IN Mlle - t � 100-Year Fload Boundary Critical Facilities A critical facility will encounter many of the same impacts as other buildings within the flood boundary. These impacts can include structural failure, extensive water damage to the facility and loss of facility functionality(e.g. a damaged police station will no longer be able to serve the community). A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. The analysis identified Plano Sewage Treatment Plant, the Oswego Pump House, and the Farnsworth House as the only critical facilities subject to flooding. Figure 4-8 shows the location of these three critical facilities. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 48 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 4-8: Boundary of 100-Year Flood Overlaid with Critical Facilities 1 � I :1,' w,m,Noovw 1 e � I 'Piano 34 I 1b I r Treatment Pia i- - Plano Sewage/ i Oswego g Y ...-J--- - --- —--- -° / Oswe Tower Pumpo Hous /fJ i qY!House Legend / .W. Potable Water Treatment Facility ■ User Defined Facility Waste Water Treatment Plant 100-Year Flood Boundary Miles Miles h' 0 0.25 0.5 1 / 0 0.25 0.5 1 Infrastructure The types of infrastructure that could be impacted by a flood include roadways, utility lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since an extensive inventory of the infrastructure is not available for this plan, it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become damaged in the event of a flood. The impacts to these items include broken, failed, or impassable roadways; broken or failed utility lines (e.g. loss of power or gas to community); or railway failure from broken or impassable railways. Bridges could also fail or become impassable, causing traffic risks. Vulnerability Analysis for Flash Flooding Flash flooding could affect any low lying location within this jurisdiction; therefore, a significant portion of county's population and buildings are vulnerable to a flash flood. These structures can expect the same impacts as discussed in a riverine flood. A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 49 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Vulnerability Analysis for Dam and Levee Failure An EAP is required to assess the effect of dam failure on these communities. In order to be considered creditable flood protection structures on FEMA's flood maps, levee owners must provide documentation to prove the levee meets design, operation, and maintenance standards for protection against the "one-percent-annual chance" flood. Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Flooding Flash flooding may affect any low lying or poorly drained location within the county; therefore many buildings and infrastructure are vulnerable to flash flooding. Currently, the Kendall County Planning, Building, and Zoning Department reviews new development within the unincorporated parts of the County for compliance with the County's Zoning ordinances. At this time no construction is planned within the area of the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, there is no new construction which will be vulnerable to a 100-year flood. Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Dam and Levee Failure The Kendall County Planning, Building, and Zoning Department reviews new development within the unincorporated parts of the County for compliance with the County's Zoning ordinances. Analysis of Community Development Trends Controlling floodplain development is the key to reducing flood-related damages. Areas with recent development within the county may be more vulnerable to drainage issues. Storm drains and sewer systems are usually most susceptible. Damage to these can cause the back up of water, sewage, and debris into homes and basements, causing structural and mechanical damage as well as creating public health hazards and unsanitary conditions. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 50 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 4.4.3 Earthquake Hazard Hazard Definition for Earthquake Hazard An earthquake is a sudden, rapid shaking of the earth caused by the breaking and shifting of rock beneath the earth's surface. For hundreds of millions of years, the forces of plate tectonics have shaped Earth as the huge plates that form the earth's surface move slowly over, under, and past each other. Sometimes the movement is gradual. At other times, the plates are locked together unable to release the accumulating energy. When the accumulated energy grows strong enough, the plates break free causing the ground to shake. Most earthquakes occur at the boundaries where the plates meet; however, some earthquakes occur in the middle of plates, as is the case for seismic zones in the Midwestern United States. The most seismically active area in the Midwest is the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Scientists have learned that the New Madrid fault system may not be the only fault system in the Central U.S. capable of producing damaging earthquakes. The Wabash Valley fault system in Illinois and Indiana shows evidence of large earthquakes in its geologic history, and there may be other, as yet unidentified, faults that could produce strong earthquakes. Ground shaking from strong earthquakes can collapse buildings and bridges; disrupt gas, electric, and phone service; and sometimes trigger landslides, avalanches, flash floods, fires, and huge destructive ocean waves (tsunamis). Buildings with foundations resting on unconsolidated landfill and other unstable soil and trailers and homes not tied to their foundations are at risk because they can be shaken off their mountings during an earthquake. When an earthquake occurs in a populated area it may cause deaths, injuries, and extensive property damage. The possibility of the occurrence of a catastrophic earthquake in the central and eastern United States is real as evidenced by history and described throughout this section. The impacts of significant earthquakes affect large areas, terminating public services and systems needed to aid the suffering and displaced. These impaired systems are interrelated in the hardest struck zones. Power lines, water and sanitary lines, and public communication may be lost; and highways, railways, rivers, and ports may not allow transportation to the affected region. Furthermore, essential facilities, such as fire and police departments and hospitals, may be disrupted if not previously improved to resist earthquakes. As with hurricanes, mass relocation may be necessary, but the residents who are suffering from the earthquake can neither leave the heavily impacted areas nor receive aid or even communication in the aftermath of a significant event. Magnitude, which is determined from measurements on seismographs, measures the energy released at the source of the earthquake. Intensity measures the strength of shaking produced by the earthquake at a certain location and is determined from effects on people, human structures, and the natural environment. Earthquake magnitudes and their corresponding intensities are listed in Tables 4-22 and 4-23. Source:http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/topicslmag_vs_intphp Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 51 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-22: Abbreviated Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale Mercalli Intensity Description I Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable conditions. II Felt only by a few persons at rest,especially on upper floors of buildings. Felt quite noticeably by persons indoors,especially on upper floors of buildings.Many people do not recognize it III as an earthquake.Standing motor cars may rock slightly.Vibrations similar to the passing of a truck.Duration estimated. Felt indoors by many,outdoors by few during the day.At night,some awakened.Dishes,windows,doors IV disturbed;walls make cracking sound.Sensation like heavy truck striking building.Standing motor cars rocked noticeably. V Felt by nearly everyone;many awakened.Some dishes,windows broken. Unstable objects overturned. Pendulum clocks may stop. VI Felt by all,many frightened.Some heavy furniture moved;a few instances of fallen plaster.Damage slight. VII Damage negligible in buildings of good design and construction;slight to moderate in well-built ordinary structures;considerable damage in poorly built or badly designed structures;some chimneys broken. Damage slight in specially designed structures;considerable damage in ordinary substantial buildings with partial VIII collapse. Damage great in poorly built structures.Fall of chimneys,factory stacks,columns,monuments,walls. Heavy furniture overturned. IX Damage considerable in specially designed structures;well-designed frame structures thrown out of plumb. Damage great in substantial buildings,with partial collapse.Buildings shifted off foundations. X Some well-built wooden structures destroyed;most masonry and frame structures destroyed with foundations. Rails bent. XI Few, if any(masonry)structures remain standing.Bridges destroyed. Rails bent greatly. XII Damage total. Lines of sight and level are distorted.Objects thrown into the air. Table 4-23: Earthquake Magnitude vs. Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale Earthquake Magnitude Typical Maximum Modified Mercalli Intensity 1.0-3.0 1 3.0-3.9 II-III 4.0-4.9 IV-V 5.0-5.9 VI-VII 6.0-6.9 VII-IX 7.0 and higher VIII or higher Previous Occurrences for Earthquake Hazard Numerous instrumentally measured earthquakes have occurred in Illinois. In the past few decades, with many precise seismographs positioned across Illinois, measured earthquakes have varied in magnitude from very low microseismic events of M=1-3 to larger events up to M=5.4. Microseismic events are usually only detectable by seismographs and rarely felt by anyone. The most recent earthquake in northern Illinois—as of the date of this report—occurred on February 10, 2010 at 3:59:35 local time about 3.0 km (2 miles) east-northeast of Virgil, IL and measured 3.8 in magnitude. The consensus of opinion among seismologists working in the Midwest is that a magnitude 5.0 to 5.5 event could occur virtually anywhere at any time throughout the region. Earthquakes occur in Illinois all the time, although damaging quakes are very infrequent. Illinois earthquakes causing minor damage occur on average every 20 years, although the actual timing is extremely variable. Most recently, a magnitude 5.2 earthquake shook southeastern Illinois on April 18, Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 52 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 2008, causing minor damage in the Mt Carmel, IL area. Earthquakes resulting in more serious damage have occurred about every 70 to 90 years mainly in Southern Illinois. Seismic activity on the New Madrid Seismic Zone of southeastern Missouri is very significant both historically and at present. On December 16, 1811 and January 23 and February 7 of 1812, three earthquakes struck the central U.S. with magnitudes estimated to be 7.5-8.0. These earthquakes caused violent ground cracking and volcano-like eruptions of sediment (sand blows) over an area of>10,500 km2, and uplift of a 50 km by 23 km zone (the Lake County uplift). The shaking collapsed scaffolding on the Capitol in Washington, D.C., and was felt over a total area of over 10 million km2 (the largest felt area of any historical earthquake). Of all the historical earthquakes that have struck the U.S., an 1811-style event would do the most damage if it recurred today. The New Madrid earthquakes are especially noteworthy because the seismic zone is in the center of the North American Plate. Such intraplate earthquakes are felt, and do damage, over much broader areas than comparable earthquakes at plate boundaries. The precise driving force responsible for activity on the New Madrid seismic zone is not known, but most scientists infer that it is compression transmitted across the North American Plate. That compression is focused on New Madrid because it is the site of a Paleozoic structure—the Reelfoot Rift—which is a zone of weakness in the crust. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the Center for Earthquake Research and Information (CERI) at the University of Memphis estimate the probability of a repeat of the 1811-1812 type earthquakes (magnitude 7.5-8.0) is 7%-10% over the next 50 years (USGS Fact Sheet 2006-3125.) Frequent large earthquakes on the New Madrid seismic zone are geologically puzzling because the region shows relatively little deformation. Three explanations have been proposed: 1) recent seismological and geodetic activity is still a short-term response to the 1811- 12 earthquakes; 2) activity is irregular or cyclic; or 3) activity began only in the recent geologic past. There is some dispute over how often earthquakes like the 1811-12 sequence occur. Many researchers estimate a recurrence interval of between 550 and 1100 years; other researchers suggest that either the magnitude of the 1811-12 earthquakes have been over-stated, or else the actual frequency of these events is less. It is fair to say, however, that even if the 1811-12 shocks were just magnitude –7 events, they nonetheless caused widespread damage and would do the same if another such earthquake or earthquake sequence were to strike today. [Above:New Madrid earthquakes and seismic zone modified from N.Pinter, 1993,Exercises in Active Tectonic history adapted from Earthquake Information Bulletin,4(3),May-June 1972.http://earthquake.usgs.govl regional/stateslillinoislhistory.php] The earliest reported earthquake in Illinois was in 1795. This event was felt at Kaskaskia, IL for a minute and a half and was also felt in Kentucky. At Kaskaskia, subterranean noises were heard. Due to the sparse frontier population, an accurate location is not possible, and the shock may have actually originated outside the state. An intensity VI-VII earthquake occurred on April 12, 1883, awakening several people in Cairo, IL. One old frame house was significantly damaged, resulting in minor injuries to the inhabitants. This is the only record of injury in the state due to earthquakes. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 53 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 On October 31, 1895 a large M6.8 occurred at Charleston, Missouri,just south of Cairo. Strong shaking caused eruptions of sand and water at many places along a line roughly 30 km (20 mi) long. Damage occurred in six states, but most severely at Charleston, with cracked walls, windows shattered, broken plaster, and chimneys fallen. Shaking was felt in 23 states from Washington, D.C. to Kansas and from southernmost Canada to New Orleans, LA. A Missouri earthquake on November 4, 1905, cracked walls in Cairo. Aftershocks were felt over an area of 100,000 square miles in nine states. In Illinois, it cracked the wall of the new education building in Cairo and a wall at Carbondale, IL. Among the largest earthquakes occurring in Illinois was the May 26, 1909 shock,which knocked over many chimneys at Aurora. It was felt over 500,000 square miles and strongly felt in Iowa and Wisconsin. Buildings swayed in Chicago where there was fear that the walls would collapse. Just under two months later, a second Intensity VII earthquake occurred on July 18, 1909, damaged chimneys in Petersburg, IL, Hannibal, MO, and Davenport, IA. Over twenty windows were broken, bricks loosened and plaster cracked in the Petersburg area. This event was felt over 40,000 square miles. On November 7, 1958, a shock along the Indiana border resulted in damage at Bartelso, Dale and Maunie, IL. Plaster cracked and fell, and a basement wall and floor were cracked. On August 14, 1965, a sharp but local shock occurred at Tamms, IL, a town of about 600 people. The magnitude 5 quake damaged chimneys, cracked walls, knocked groceries from the shelves, and muddied the water supply. Thunderous earth noises were heard. This earthquake was only felt within a 10 mile radius of Tamms, in communities such as Elco, Unity, Olive Branch, and Olmsted, IL. Six aftershocks were felt. An earthquake of Intensity VII occurred on November 9, 1968. This magnitude 5.3 shock was felt over an area of 580,000 square miles in 23 states. Damage consisted of bricks being knocked from chimneys, broken windows, toppled television antenna, and cracked plaster. There were scattered reports of cracked foundations, fallen parapets, and overturned tombstones. Chimney damage was limited to buildings 30 to 50 years old. Many people were frightened. Church bells rang at Broughton and several other towns. Loud rumbling earthquake noise was reported in many communities. Dozens of other shocks originating in Missouri, Arkansas, Kansas, Nebraska, Tennessee, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Canada have been felt in Illinois without causing damage. There have been three earthquakes slightly greater than magnitude 5.0 and Intensity level VII which occurred in 1968, 1987 and 2008 and that were widely felt throughout southern Illinois and the midcontinent. Above text adapted from http://earthquake.usgs.govl regional/stateslillinoislhistory.php and from Seismicity of the United States, 1568-1989 (Revised), C.W. Stover and J.L. Coffman, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1527, United States Government Printing Office, Washington:1993. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 54 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Geographic Location for Earthquake Hazard Within Illinois, the two most significant zones of seismic activity are the New Madrid Seismic Zone and the Wabash Valley Fault System. There have been no earthquake epicenters recorded in Kendall County since 1974. Figure 4-9 depicts the following: a) Location of notable earthquakes in the Illinois region; b) Generalized geologic bedrock map with earthquake epicenters, geologic structures, and inset of Kendall County; c) Geologic and earthquake epicenter map of Kendall County. Figure 4-9 a, b, c: Kendall County Earthquakes A Legend lam • R.kf•rd EeetM1 Q4. nw sklc unn S uUW Fwdee MFwks Ceder Repko ChJ"n nwae = =mns �7 Qs Mofis G� 5-th Bnd K • -zn fir,,.e,-a �nwr•r. �G-nnie Fm �. snrF•w a- • � «naim m. gym..-rm �r..n.enod�.}s.dl,e �eala Fnn w.me Oh1O a _s 3.0 -� sn.i.fgg l�e.r,Flw.ww Illinois Indiana • o p DV. • �a ° ®s�weuera._I`e:�a F� SPai"Reid fn n nc.-.�..- KansasCltY a�fls • �i r,..,r a,,,,. �I.x.,,,..,, �uax r>n=o- mmP•ndenoe o � o m j n at.LWI U Il o o aa�nyf5roo Ni$souF'r, © C. elsvtlle _ Lwringirn item OKentucky F ,a&ll _ u o a n nrffinkrree Arkansas oo '°le•- p Tennessee o crest Hil • + Mempnls cn�nona 0©10 urr AR«t< O O • Jo'cr • oc � o o PAssissippi Alabama 0 i9 140 Mlles M emery .Aurora tt 47! Ider , 26 I �ipy 14 V 34 A - rJ 1 1 Yor 11' 71;1 J Made 11J��.. j nfl i, a7 axe 52 52 Mlnooka 5MIles Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 55 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Hazard Extent for Earthquake Hazard The extent of the earthquake is countywide. One of the most critical sources of information that is required for accurate assessment of earthquake risk is soils data. A National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) compliant soils map was used for the analysis which was provided by FEMA. The map identifies the soils most susceptible to failure. Risk Identification for Earthquake Hazard Based on historical information as well as current USGS and SIUC research and studies, future earthquakes in Kendall County are possible but, large ( >5.5 M) earthquakes that would cause catastrophic damage are unlikely. Severe to catastrophic earthquake damage is unlikely because of the large distance (>300 miles) between Kendall County and the major Midwestern seismic zones, the New Madrid Seismic Zone and the Wabash Valley Fault Zone. According to the RPI, earthquakes are ranked as the number seven hazard. RPI=Probability x Magnitude/Severity. _ Probability x Magnitude/Severity RPI 1 x 2 = 2 Vulnerability Analysis for Earthquake Hazard This hazard could impact the entire jurisdiction equally; therefore, the entire county's population and all buildings are vulnerable to an earthquake and can expect the same impacts within the affected area. To accommodate this risk, this plan will consider all buildings located within the county as vulnerable. Critical Facilities All critical facilities are vulnerable to earthquakes. A critical facility would encounter many of the same impacts as any other building within the county. These impacts include structural failure and loss of facility functionality (e.g. a damaged police station will no longer be able to serve the community). A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. Building Inventory A table of the building exposure in terms of types and numbers of buildings for the entire county is listed in Table 4-10. The buildings within the county can all expect the same impacts, similar to those discussed for critical facilities. These impacts include structural failure and loss of building function which could result in indirect impacts (e.g. damaged homes will no longer be habitable causing residents to seek shelter). Infrastructure During an earthquake, the types of infrastructure that could be impacted include roadways, utility lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since an extensive inventory of the infrastructure is not Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 56 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 available to this plan, it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become damaged in the event of an earthquake. The impacts to these items include broken, failed, or impassable roadways, broken or failed utility lines (e.g. loss of power or gas to community), and railway failure from broken or impassable railways. Bridges could also fail or become impassable causing traffic risks. Typical scenarios are described to gauge the anticipated impacts of earthquakes in the county in terms of numbers and types of buildings and infrastructure. The SIUC-Polis team reviewed existing geological information and recommendations for earthquake scenarios. A deterministic and a probabilistic earthquake scenario were developed to provide a reasonable basis for earthquake planning in Kendall County. The deterministic scenario was a moment magnitude of 5.5 with the epicenter located in Kendall County along the Sandwich Fault Zone south of Yorkville. This represents a realistic scenario for planning purposes. Additionally, the earthquake loss analysis included a probabilistic scenario based on ground shaking parameters derived from U.S. Geological Survey probabilistic seismic hazard curves for the earthquake with the 500-year return period. This scenario evaluates the average impacts of a multitude of possible earthquake epicenters with a magnitude that would be typical of that expected for a 500-year return period. The following earthquake hazard modeling scenarios were performed: • 5.5 magnitude earthquake local epicenter • 500-year return period event Modeling a deterministic scenario requires user input for a variety of parameters. One of the most critical sources of information that is required for accurate assessment of earthquake risk is soils data. Fortunately, a National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) soil classification map exists for Illinois. NEHRP soil classifications portray the degree of shear- wave amplification that can occur during ground shaking. FEMA provided a soils map and liquefaction potential map that was used by HAZUS-MH. Earthquake hypocenter depths in Illinois range from less than 1.0 to —25.0 km. The average hypocenter depth, —10.0 km, was used for the deterministic earthquake scenario. For this scenario type HAZUS-MH also requires the user to define an attenuation function. To maintain consistency with the USGS's (2006) modeling of strong ground motion in the central United States, the Toro et al. (1997) attenuation function was used for the deterministic earthquake scenario. The building losses are broken into two categories: direct building losses and business interruption losses. The direct building losses are the estimated costs to repair or replace the damage caused to the building and its contents. The business interruption losses are the losses associated with inability to operate a business because of the damage sustained during the earthquake. Business interruption losses also include the temporary living expenses for those people displaced from their homes because of the earthquake. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 57 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Results for 5.5 Magnitude Earthquake in Kendall County The results of the initial analysis, the 5.5 magnitude earthquake with an epicenter along the Sandwich Fault Zone south of The United City of Yorkville, are depicted in Tables 4-24 and 4- 25 and Figure 4-10. HAZUS estimates that approximately 2,600 buildings will be at least moderately damaged. This is more than 12% of the total number of buildings in the region. It is estimated that 109 buildings will be damaged beyond repair. The total building related losses totaled $253.6 million; 14% of the estimated losses were related to the business interruption of the region. By far, the largest loss was sustained by the residential occupancies, which comprised more than 64% of the total loss. Table 4-24: Kendall County 5.5M Scenario-Damage Counts by Building Occupancy None Slight Moderate Extensive Complete Count (%) Count {%] Count Count M)I Count M Agriculture 98 0.58 38 0.87 39 1.96 16 3.22 3 2.61 Commercial 660 423 230 526 177 8.89 59 t 1.68 10 9.51 Education 17 0.11 6 0.13 5 025 2 032 0 0 37 Government 10 0.07 4 0.10 4 022 1 0.28 0 036 Industrial 269 1.73 95 2.18 79 4.00 28 555 5 4.34 Other Residential 2,241 14.38 679 15.51 309 15.57 79 1563 18 16.81 Religion 40 026 13 030 10 049 3 0.67 1 062 Single Family 12,260 78.65 3,309 75-641 1,362 68.62 316 62.64 72 6537 Total 15,588 4.375 i 1,985 5051 1 110 Table 4-25: Kendall County 5.5M Scenario-Building Economic Losses in Millions of Dollars Category Area Single Other Commercial Industrial Others Total Family Residential Income Loses Wage 0.00 0.40 5.26 0.45 0.45 6.55 Capital-Related 0.00 0.17 5.03 0.27 0.10 5.57 Rental 2.54 1.00 3.31 0.16 0.16 7.16 Relocation 9.35 0.52 4.78 0.84 1.37 16.86 Subtotal 1 11.88 2.09 18.37 1.71 2.08 36.14 Capital Stock Loses Structural 19.71 1.10 6.84 239 2.38 32.41 Non_Struchiral 81.07 8.01 19.69 929 5.134 123.09 Content 34.62 272 12.55 6.73 3.43 6004 li Inventary 0.00 0.00 0.42 137 0.15 1.93 Subtotal 135.39 11.83 39.49 19.78 10.99 217.48 Total ' 147.28 13.92 57.86 21.49 13.07 253.62 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 58 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 4-10: Kendall County 5.5M Scenario-Building Economic Losses in Thousands of Dollars Legend 5.5 M Arbitrary Earthquake Scenario Building Damage by Tract Moutgom ry Total Loss in$1000 "'' ,401� 1 it ulder Hill _4,873-7,500 1111111/7,501-25,000 25,001-33,000 L�! 33,001-45,500 "i pie r 34 an i -45,501-67,000 San �ch Y �a! j = J n_� ,ry Epicenter •� (_h, � Fault ` "L� NewNewark sz 52 0 1.5 6Mlles I LIs6o 4 Kendall County 5.5M Scenario—Essential Facility Losses Before the earthquake, the region had 188 care beds available for use. On the day of the earthquake, the model estimates that only 7 care beds (4%) are available for use by patients already in medical care facilities and those injured by the earthquake. After one week, 58% of the beds will be back in service. By day 30, 85%will be operational. Results 5.0 Magnitude 500-Year Probabilistic Scenario The results of the 500-year probabilistic analysis are depicted in Tables 4-26 and 4-27. HAZUS- MH estimates that approximately 183 buildings will be at least moderately damaged. This is more than 1% of the total number of buildings in the region. It is estimated that seven buildings will be damaged beyond repair. The total building-related losses totaled $8.64 million; 27% of the estimated losses were related to the business interruption of the region. By far, the largest loss was sustained by the residential occupancies, which made up more than 60% of the total loss. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 59 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-26: 500-Year Probabilistic Scenario-Damage Counts by Building Occupancy None Slight Moderate Extensive Complete Count (%) Count N Count (%) Count N Count try Agriculture 174 0.80 8 1.51 3 2.12 0 2.12 0 128 Commercial 1,070 4.90 47 8.59 17 1(1_51 2 10.31 0 7.03 Education 28 0.13 1 0 24 0 0.31 0 0.30 0 0.33 Government 20 0.09 1 0.14 0 0.17 0 0.15 0 0.17 Industrial 449 2.06 20 3.60 7 4.56 1 4.41 0 2.62 Other Residential 3220 14.75 79 14.43 23 14.44 3 1421 0 15.02 Religion 63 029 3 0.48 1 0.65 0 066, 0 0.59 Single Family 16,806 76.99 390 71.02 106 67.18 16 67.83 1 72.86 Tota I 21,830 554 158 23 2 Table 4-27: 500-Year Probabilistic Scenario-Building Economic Losses in Millions of Dollars Category Area Single Other Commercial Industrial Others Total Family Residential Income Loses Wage 0.00 0.01 0.36 0.03 0.03 0.43 Capital-Related 0.00 0.01 0.33 0.02 0.01 0.36 Rental 0.16 0.06 025 0.01 0.01 0.49 Relocation ' 0.58 0.03 0.32 0.06 0.08 1.07 Subtotal 0.73 0.11 1.27 0.11 0.12 2,34 Capital Stack Loses Structural 127 0.08 0.45 0.15 0.13 208 Non Structural 2.36 0.21 0.56 0.18 0.12 3.44 Content 0.39 0.03 0.19 0.10 0.04 0.75 Inventory 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 r 0.03 4.03 0.31 1.21 0.45 0.30 6.29 4.76 0.43 2.48 0.56 0.41 8.64 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 60 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Figure 4-11: Kendall County 5.5M Probabilistic Earthquake Scenario-Building Economic Losses in Thousands of Dollars Legend 5.0 M Probabilistic Earthquake Scenario Building Damage by Tract Total Loss in$1000 W �Ikk 3� f�j _�� _ ? RA _2816-470 _ �� I- I 1 -471-800 801-1,300 1,301 -1,500 1 _J yPLAMO.CI I" IM 1,501 •2,200 N � Miles ORK 1 Y L ` a 1.25 25 5 ✓1 .� ... 7 iPLAINF 10 rAl K YO MILLIFIG70N 1, M • ., ii.l,. � 1 .S IPLATTVILLE Yo�JOLIET �r.. , 4rsabry MINQO" MINO{]KAMIMO=frlD�7KA. 500-Year Probabilistic Scenario—Essential Facility Losses Before the earthquake, the region had 188 care beds available for use. On the day of the earthquake, the model estimates that only 113 care beds (61%) are available for use by patients already in medical care facilities and those injured by the earthquake. After one week, 98% of the beds will be back in service. By day 30, 100% will be operational. Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Earthquake Hazard New construction, especially critical facilities, will accommodate earthquake mitigation design standards. Analysis of Community Development Trends Community development will occur outside of the low-lying areas in floodplains with a water table within five feet of grade that is susceptible to liquefaction. In Meeting #4, the MHMP team discussed specific mitigation strategies for potential earthquake hazards. The discussion included strategies to harden and protect future, as well as existing, structures against the possible termination of public services and systems including power lines, water and sanitary lines, and public communication. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 61 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 4.4.4 Thunderstorm Hazard Hazard Definition for Thunderstorm Hazard Severe thunderstorms are defined as thunderstorms with one or more of the following characteristics: strong winds, large damaging hail, or frequent lightning. Severe thunderstorms most frequently occur in Illinois during the spring and summer months, but can occur any month of the year at any time of day. A severe thunderstorm's impacts can be localized or can be widespread in nature. A thunderstorm is classified as severe when it meets one or more of the following criteria. • Hail of diameter 0.75 inches or higher • Frequent and dangerous lightning • Wind speeds equal to or greater than 58 miles per hour Hail Hail is a product of a strong thunderstorm. Hail usually falls near the center of a storm, however strong winds occurring at high altitudes in the thunderstorm can blow the hailstones away from the storm center, resulting in damage in other areas near the storm. Hailstones range from pea- sized to baseball-sized, but hailstones larger than softballs have been reported on rare occasions. Lightning Lightning is a discharge of electricity from a thunderstorm. Lightning is often perceived as a minor hazard, but in reality lightning causes damage to many structures and kills or severely injures numerous people in the United States each year. Severe Winds (Straight-Line Winds) Straight-line winds from thunderstorms are a fairly common occurrence across Illinois. Straight- line winds can cause damage to homes, businesses, power lines, and agricultural areas, and may require temporary sheltering of individuals who are without power for extended periods of time. Previous Occurrences for Thunderstorm Hazard The NCDC database reported 37 hail storms in Kendall County since 1956. Hail storms occur nearly every year in the late spring and early summer months. The most recent reported occurrence was in October 2006 when severe thunderstorms developed over northeast Illinois. Kendall County hail storms are identified in Table 4-28. Additional details for NCDC events are included in Appendix D. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 62 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-28: Kendall County Hail Storms` Location or County Date Type Magnitude Death Injuries Property Crop Damage Damage Kendall County 3/6/1956 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 6/16/1973 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 6/20/1975 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 7/1/1983 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 4/10/1995 Hail 0.50 in. 0 0 0 0 Plattville 4/19/1996 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0 0 Plattville 4/19/1996 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Newark 6/10/1999 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0 0 Newark 5/12/2000 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/12/2000 Hail 3.50 in. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 5/12/2000 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Millington 5/18/2000 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/18/2000 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Plano 9/11/2000 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 6/25/2002 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0 0 Plattville 6/25/2002 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 0 0 Bristol 5/28/2003 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Plano 7/11/2003 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 7/15/2003 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 8/1/2003 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0 0 Boulder Hill 8/1/2003 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/23/2004 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/23/2004 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 7/21/2004 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 3/30/2005 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 3/30/2005 Hail 1.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Newark 3/30/2005 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 5/11/2005 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 5/19/2005 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Plano 6/4/2005 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 4/2/2006 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0 0 Plano 4/14/2006 Hail 1.00 in. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 4/14/2006 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Central 4/14/2006 Hail 0.88 in. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 4/16/2006 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Lisbon 10/2/2006 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 Lisbon 10/2/2006 Hail 0.75 in. 0 0 0 0 * NCDC records are estimates of damage compiled by the National Weather Service from various local, state, and federal sources. However, these estimates are often preliminary in nature and may not match the final assessment of economic and property losses related to a given weather event. The NCDC database reported no occurrences of significant lightning strikes in Kendall County since 1954. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 63 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 The NCDC database identified 92 wind storms reported since 1957, the most recent of which was reported in August 2009 when storms produced wind gusts between 60 and 70 miles per hour. As shown in Table 4-29, wind storms have historically occurred year-round with the greatest frequency and damage between May and July. The following table includes available top wind speeds for Kendall County. Table 4-29: Kendall County Wind Storms* Location or Date Type Magnitude Death Injuries Property Crop County Damage Damage Kendall County 8/3/1957 Tstm Wind n/a 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 5/15/1968 Tstm Wind n/a 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 5/15/1968 Tstm Wind n/a 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 5/12/1970 Tstm Wind 61 kts. 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 6/30/1977 Tstm Wind n/a 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 7/9/1980 Tstm Wind 58 kts. 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 8/28/1990 Tstm Wind 80 kts. 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 7/2/1992 Tstm Wind n/a 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 8/23/1993 Tstm Wind n/a 0 0 0 0 Plattville 5/25/1994 Tstm Wind n/a 0 0 0 0 Northern Illinois 10/24/1995 High Wind n/a 2 0 0 0 Northern Illinois 3/25/1996 High Wind 48 kts. 0 0 0 0 Northwest 6/23/1996 Tstm Wind n/a 0 0 0 0 Oswego 7/24/1996 Tstm Wind n/a 0 0 0 0 Countywide 10/29/1996 Tstm Wind 57 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/18/1997 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Countywide 7/18/1997 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Northern Illinois 9/29/1997 High Wind 56 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/28/1998 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Sandwich 6/18/1998 Tstm Wind 64 kts. 0 0 0 0 Lisbon 6/28/1998 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Lisbon 6/29/1998 Tstm Wind 61 kts. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 8/2411998 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Lisbon 9/20/1998 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Northern Illinois 11110/1998 High Wind 56 kts. 0 4 0 0 Countywide 11/10/1998 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 7/21/1999 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Sandwich 5/18/2000 Tstm Wind 52 kts. 0 0 0 0 Newark 5/18/2000 Tstm Wind 60 kts. 0 0 0 0 Sandwich 8/6/2000 Tstm Wind 52 kts. 0 0 0 0 Northern Illinois 2/25/2001 Strong Wind n/a 0 0 0 0 Newark 6/14/2001 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 7/22/2001 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 9/6/2001 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Northern Illinois 3/9/2002 High Wind 51 kts. 4 4 200K 0 Yorkville 6/4/2002 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 64 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Location or Date Type Magnitude Death Injuries Property Crop County Damage Damage Yorkville 5/30/2003 Tstm Wind 60 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 7/7/2003 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plano 7/7/2003 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plano 7/11/2003 Tstm Wind 61 kts. 0 0 0 0 Lisbon 7/11/2003 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 7/17/2003 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Countywide 7/27/2003 Tstm Wind 57 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plano 7/31/2003 Tstm Wind 52 kts. 0 0 0 0 Northern Illinois 11/13/2003 High Wind 51 kts. 0 2 0 0 Yorkville 5/12/2004 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Oswego 5/12/2004 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Millbrook 5/13/2004 Tstm Wind 57 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plano 5/13/2004 Tstm Wind 58 kts. 0 0 0 0 Little Rock 5/13/2004 Tstm Wind 61 kts. 0 0 0 0 Bristol 5/13/2004 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/30/2004 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/30/2004 Tstm Wind 53 kts. 0 0 0 0 Countywide 5/30/2004 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plano 5/30/2004 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 1 0 0 Yorkville 7/22/2004 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Newark 3/30/2005 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/19/2005 Tstm Wind 55 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 5/19/2005 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Lisbon 8/2/2006 Tstm Wind 52 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plano 8/3/2006 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Newark 8/10/2006 Tstm Wind 55 kts. 0 0 0 0 Boulder Hill 10/2/2006 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 25K 0 Yorkville 10/2/2006 Tstm Wind 55 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plano 10/2/2006 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plano 10/2/2006 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Newark 3/31/2007 Tstm Wind 61 kts. 0 0 0 0 Bristol Station 3/31/2007 Tstm Wind 61 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plano 6/1/2007 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 5K 0 Yorkville 6/1/2007 Tstm Wind 56 kts. 0 0 5K 0 Plano 7/10/2007 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Boulder Hill 7/18/2007 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 7/18/2007 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plattville 8/23/2007 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Little Rock 6/15/2008 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 6/15/2008 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plano 6/28/2008 Tstm Wind 50 kts. 0 0 0 0 Plattville 7/10/2008 Tstm Wind 55 kts. 0 0 1 K 0 Lisbon Center 7/10/2008 Tstm Wind 55 kits. 0 0 0 0 Millbrook 8/4/2008 Tstm Wind 52 kts. 0 0 1 K 0 Plano 8/4/2008 Tstm Wind 56 kts. 0 0 4K 0 Bristol 8/4/2008 Tstm Wind 61 kts. 0 0 1K 0 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 65 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Location or Date Type Magnitude Death Injuries Property Crop County Damage Damage Plattville 6/19/2009 Tstm Wind 56 kts. 0 0 1 K 0 Yorkville 6/19/2009 Tstm Wind 61 kts. 0 0 1K 0 Oswego 6/19/2009 Tstm Wind 65 kts. 0 0 0 0 Yorkville 6/19/2009 Tstm Wind 61 kts. 0 0 1K 0 Boulder Hill 8/16/2009 Tstm Wind 54 kts. 0 0 0 0 * NCDC records are estimates of damage compiled by the National Weather Service from various local, state, and federal sources. However, these estimates are often preliminary in nature and may not match the final assessment of economic and property losses related to a given weather event. Geographic Location for Thunderstorm Hazard The entire county has the same risk for occurrence of thunderstorms. They can occur at any location within the county. Hazard Extent for Thunderstorm Hazard The extent of the historical thunderstorms varies in terms of the extent of the storm, the wind speed, and the size of hail stones. Thunderstorms can occur at any location within the county. Risk Identification for Thunderstorm Hazard Based on historical information, the occurrence of future high winds, hail, and lightning is highly likely. High winds with widely varying magnitudes are expected to happen. According to the RPI, thunderstorms and high wind damage ranked as the number one hazard. RPI=Probability x Magnitude/Severity. Probability x Magnitude = RPI /Severity 4 x 2 = 8 Vulnerability Analysis for Thunderstorm Hazard Severe thunderstorms are an equally distributed threat across the entire jurisdiction; therefore, the entire county's population and all buildings are vulnerable to a severe thunderstorm and can expect the same impacts within the affected area. This plan will therefore consider all buildings located within the county as vulnerable. The existing buildings and infrastructure in Kendall County are discussed in Table 4-10. Critical Facilities All critical facilities are vulnerable to severe thunderstorms. A critical facility will encounter many of the same impacts as any other building within the jurisdiction. These impacts include structural failure, damaging debris (trees or limbs), roofs blown off or windows broken by hail or high winds, fires caused by lightning, and loss of building functionality (e.g. a damaged police station will no longer be able to serve the community). Table 4-9 lists the types and numbers of Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 66 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 all of the essential facilities in the area. A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. Building Inventory A table of the building exposure in terms of types and numbers of buildings for the entire county is provided in Table 4-10. The buildings within the county can all expect the same impacts, similar to those discussed for critical facilities. These impacts include structural failure, damaging debris (trees or limbs), roofs blown off or windows broken by hail or high winds, fires caused by lightning, and loss of building functionality (e.g. a damaged home will no longer be habitable causing residents to seek shelter). Infrastructure During a severe thunderstorm, the types of infrastructure that could be impacted include roadways, utility lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since the county's entire infrastructure is equally vulnerable it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become damaged during a severe thunderstorm. The impacts to these items include broken, failed, or impassable roadways; broken or failed utility lines (e.g. loss of power or gas to community); or railway failure from broken or impassable railways. Bridges could fail or become impassable causing risk to traffic. Potential Dollar Losses for Thunderstorm Hazard A HAZUS-MH analysis was not completed for thunderstorms because the widespread extent of such a hazard makes it difficult to accurately model outcomes. To determine dollar losses for a thunderstorm hazard, the available NCDC hazard information was condensed to include only thunderstorm hazards that occurred within the past ten years. Kendall County's MHMP team then reviewed the property damages reported to NCDC and made any applicable updates. It was determined that since 1999, Kendall County has incurred $245,000 in damages relating to thunderstorms, including hail, lightning, and high winds. The events resulting in property damage are listed in Table 4-30. Table 4-30: Kendall County Property Damage (1999—Present) Location or County Date Type Property Damage 1999-2001 Subtotal $ Northern Illinois 03/09/02 High Wind $ 200,000 2002 Subtotal $ 200,000 2003-2005 Subtotal $ - Boulder Hill 10/02/06 Tstm Wind $ 25,000 2006 Subtotal $ 25,000 Plano 06/01/07 Tstm Wind $ 5,000 Yorkville 06/01/07 Tstm Wind $ 5,000 2007 Subtotal $ 10,000 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 67 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Location or County Date Type Property Damage Plattville 07/10/08 Tstm Wind $ 1,000 Millbrook 08/04/08 Tstm Wind $ 1,000 Plano 08/04/08 Tstm Wind $ 4,000 Bristol 08/04/08 Tstm Wind $ 1,000 2008 Subtotal $ 7,000 Plattville 06/19/09 Tstm Wind $ 1,000 Yorkville 06/19/09 Tstm Wind $ 1,000 Yorkville 06/19/09 Tstm Wind $ 1,000 2009 Subtotal $ 3,000 Total Property Damage $ 245,000 The historical data has not been collected systematically or confirmed. As a result, potential dollar losses for a future event cannot be precisely calculated; however, based on averages in the last decade, it can be determined that Kendall County incurs an annual risk of approximately $24,500 per year. Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Thunderstorm Hazard All future development within the county and all communities will remain vulnerable to these events. Analysis of Community Development Trends Preparing for severe storms will be enhanced if officials sponsor a wide range of programs and initiatives to address the overall safety of county residents. New structures need to be built with more sturdy construction, and those structures already in place need to be hardened to lessen the potential impacts of severe weather. Community warning sirens to provide warning of approaching storms are also vital to preventing the loss of property and ensuring the safety of Kendall County residents. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 68 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 4.4.5 Winter Storm Hazard Hazard Definition for Winter Storm Hazard Severe winter weather consists of various forms of precipitation and strong weather conditions. This may include one or more of the following: freezing rain, sleet, heavy snow, blizzards, icy roadways, extreme low temperatures, and strong winds. These conditions can cause human health risks such as frostbite, hypothermia, and death. Ice (glazing) and Sleet Storms Ice or sleet, even in small quantities, can result in hazardous driving conditions and can cause property damage. Sleet involves frozen raindrops that bounce when they hit the ground or other objects. Sleet does not stick to trees and wires. Ice storms, on the other hand, involve liquid rain that falls through subfreezing air and/or onto sub-freezing surfaces, freezing on contact with those surfaces. The ice coats trees, buildings, overhead wires, and roadways, sometimes causing extensive damage. The most damaging winter storms in southern Illinois have been ice storms. Ice storms occur when moisture-laden gulf air converges with the northern jet stream causing strong winds and heavy precipitation. This precipitation takes the form of freezing rain coating power and communication lines and trees with heavy ice. The winds will then cause the overburdened limbs and cables to snap; leaving large sectors of the population without power, heat, or communication. Snowstorms Significant snowstorms are characterized by the rapid accumulation of snow, often accompanied by high winds, cold temperatures, and low visibility. A blizzard is categorized as a snowstorm with winds of 35 miles per hour or greater and/or visibility of less than one-quarter mile for three or more hours. The strong winds during a blizzard blow about falling and already existing snow, creating poor visibility and impassable roadways. Blizzards have the potential to result in property damage. Illinois has repeatedly been struck by blizzards. Blizzard conditions cannot only cause power outages and loss of communication, but also make transportation difficult. The blowing of snow can reduce visibility to less than one-quarter mile, and the resulting disorientation makes even travel by foot dangerous if not deadly. Severe Cold Severe cold is characterized by the ambient air temperature dropping to around 0 F or below. These extreme temperatures can increase the likelihood of frostbite and hypothermia. High winds during severe cold events can enhance the air temperature's effects. Fast winds during cold weather events can lower the wind chill factor (how cold the air feels on your skin). As a result, the time it takes for frostbite and hypothermia to affect a person's body will decrease. Previous Occurrences for Winter Storm Hazard Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 69 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 The NCDC database identified 33 winter storm and extreme cold events for Kendall County since 1994. The most recent reported event occurred on January 14, 2009, when a small winter storm moved across northern Illinois. Snowfall amounts ranged from 6 to 7 inches. The NCDC winter storms are listed in Table 4-32. Additional details for NCDC events are included in Appendix D. Table 4-32: Winter Storm Events* Location or County Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Crop Damage Damage Northeast Illinois 1/26/1994 Ice Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 12/8/1995 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 2/2/1996 Extreme Cold 3 0 0 0 Statewide 1/15/1997 Winter Storm 5 0 0 0 Statewide 3/9/1998 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 Statewide 1/1/1999 Heavy Snow 1 0 0 0 Statewide 318/1999 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 Statewide 1/19/2000 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 Statewide 2/18/2000 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 Statewide 12/11/2000 Blizzard 0 0 0 0 Statewide 1/30/2002 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 3/2/2002 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 3/4/2003 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 5/3/2004 Frost/freeze 0 0 0 0 Statewide 1/4/2005 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 Statewide 1/21/2005 Heavy Snow 0 0 0 0 Statewide 11/30/2006 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 12/1/2006 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 2/6/2007 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 2/13/2007 Blizzard 0 0 0 0 Statewide 2/25/2007 Blizzard 0 0 0 0 Statewide 2/25/2007 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 1211/2007 Ice Storm 0 0 5K 0 Statewide 1/29/2008 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 21112008 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 12/18/2008 Ice Storm 0 0 0 0 Statewide 12/18/2008 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 Kendall County 1/14/2009 Winter Storm 0 0 0 0 * NCDC records are estimates of damage compiled by the National Weather Service from various local, state, and federal sources. However, these estimates are often preliminary in nature and may not match the final assessment of economic and property losses related to a given weather event. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 70 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Geographic Location for Winter Storm Hazard Severe winter storms are regional in nature. Most of the NCDC data is calculated regionally or in some cases statewide. Hazard Extent for Winter Storm Hazard The extent of the historical winter storms varies in terms of storm location, temperature, and ice or snowfall. A severe winter storm can occur anywhere in the jurisdiction. Risk Identification for Winter Storm Hazard Based on historical information and input from the planning team, the occurrence of future winter storms is likely. Winter storms of varying magnitudes are expected to happen. According to the RPI, winter storms were ranked as the number five hazard. RPI=Probability x Magnitude/Severity. Probability x Magnitude RPI /Severity - 3 x 1 = 3 Vulnerability Analysis for Winter Storm Hazard Winter storm impacts are equally distributed across the entire jurisdiction; therefore, the entire county is vulnerable to a winter storm and can expect the same impacts within the affected area. The building exposure for Kendall County, as determined from the building inventory, is included in Table 4-10. Critical Facilities All critical facilities are vulnerable to a winter storm. A critical facility will encounter many of the same impacts as other buildings within the jurisdiction. These impacts include loss of gas or electricity from broken or damaged utility lines, damaged or impassable roads and railways, broken water pipes, and roof collapse from heavy snow. Table 4-9 lists the types and numbers of the essential facilities in the area. A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. Building Inventory A table of the building exposure in terms of types and numbers of buildings for the entire county is listed in Table 4-10. The impacts to the general buildings within the county are similar to the damages expected to the critical facilities. These include loss of gas or electricity from broken or damaged utility lines, damaged or impassable roads and railways, broken water pipes, and roof collapse from heavy snow. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 71 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Infrastructure During a winter storm, the types of infrastructure that could be impacted include roadways, utility lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since the county's entire infrastructure is equally vulnerable it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become damaged during a winter storm. Potential impacts include broken gas and/or electricity lines or damaged utility lines, damaged or impassable roads and railways, and broken water pipes. Potential Dollar Losses for Winter Storm Hazard A HAZUS-MH analysis was not completed for winter storms because the widespread extent of such a hazard makes it difficult to accurately model outcomes. To determine dollar losses for a winter storm hazard, the available NCDC hazard information was condensed to include only winter storm hazards that occurred within the past ten years. Kendall County's MHMP team then reviewed the property damages reported to NCDC and made any applicable updates. Review of NCDC Database and other historical records revealed Kendall County has not incurred significant property damages over the last decade (1999-2009) from winter storms, including sleet/ice and heavy snow. Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Winter Storm Hazard Any new development within the county will remain vulnerable to these events. Analysis of Community Development Trends Because the winter storm events are regional in nature future development will be equally impacted across the county. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 72 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 4.4.6 Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard Hazard Definition for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard Illinois has numerous active transportation lines that run through many of its counties. Active railways transport harmful and volatile substances between our borders every day. The transportation of chemicals and substances along interstate routes is commonplace in Illinois. The rural areas of Illinois have considerable agricultural commerce creating a demand for fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides to be transported along rural roads. These factors increase the chance of hazardous material releases and spills throughout the state of Illinois. The release or spill of certain substances can cause an explosion. Explosions result from the ignition of volatile products such as petroleum products, natural and other flammable gases, hazardous materials/chemicals, dust, and bombs. An explosion can potentially cause death, injury, and property damage. In addition, a fire routinely follows an explosion which may cause further damage and inhibit emergency response. Emergency response may require fire, safety/law enforcement, search and rescue, and hazardous materials units. Previous Occurrences for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard Kendall County has not experienced a significantly large-scale hazardous material incident at a fixed site or during transport resulting in multiple deaths or serious injuries, although there have been many minor releases that have put local firefighters, hazardous materials teams, emergency management, and local law enforcement into action to try to stabilize these incidents and prevent or lessen harm to Kendall County residents. Geographic Location for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard The hazardous material hazards are countywide and are primarily associated with the transport of materials via highway, railroad, and/or river barge. Hazard Extent for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard The extent of the hazardous material hazard varies both in terms of the quantity of material being transported as well as the specific content of the container. Risk Identification for Hazardous Materials Release Based on input from the planning team, the occurrence of a hazardous materials accident is likely. According to the RPI, Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport ranked as the number three hazard. RPI=Probability x Magnitude/Severity. Probability x Magnitude = RPI /Severity 3 x 2 = 6 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 73 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Vulnerability Analysis for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard Hazardous material impacts are an equally distributed threat across the entire jurisdiction; therefore, the entire county is vulnerable to a hazardous material release and can expect the same impacts within the affected area. The main concern during a release or spill is the population affected. The building exposure for Kendall County, as determined from building inventory, is included in Table 4-10. This plan will therefore consider all buildings located within the county as vulnerable. Critical Facilities All critical facilities and communities within the county are at risk. A critical facility will encounter many of the same impacts as any other building within the jurisdiction. These impacts include structural failure due to fire or explosion and loss of function of the facility (e.g. a damaged police station will no longer be able to serve the community). Table 4-9 lists the types and numbers of all essential facilities in the area. A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. Building Inventory A table of the building exposure in terms of types and numbers of buildings for the entire county is listed in Table 4-10. The buildings within the county can all expect the same impacts, similar to those discussed for critical facilities. These impacts include structural failure due to fire or explosion or debris and loss of function of the building (e.g. a damaged home will no longer be habitable causing residents to seek shelter). Infrastructure During a hazardous material release the types of infrastructure that could be impacted include roadways, utility lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since an extensive inventory of the infrastructure is not available to this plan it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become damaged in the event of a hazardous material release. The impacts to these items include broken, failed, or impassable roadways; broken or failed utility lines (e.g. loss of power or gas to community); and railway failure from broken or impassable railways. Bridges could fail or become impassable causing risk to traffic. In terms of numbers and types of buildings and infrastructure, typical scenarios are described to gauge the anticipated impacts of hazardous material release events in the county. The U.S. EPA's ALOHA (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) model was utilized to assess the area of impact for an anhydrous ammonia release at the intersection of Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad and Fox River Drive Road in Plano. The target area was selected for three primary reasons: 1) the high volume traffic, 2) the area is highly populated and 3) proximity to several critical facilities. Chlorine is a greenish yellow gas with a pungent suffocating odor. The gas liquefies at -35°C and room pressure or will liquefy from pressure applied at room temperature. Contact with Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 74 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 unconfined liquid chlorine can cause frostbite from evaporative cooling. Chlorine does not burn, but, like oxygen, supports combustion. The toxic gas can have adverse health effects from either long-term inhalation of low concentrations of vapors or short-term inhalation of high concentrations. Chlorine vapors are much heavier than air and tend to settle in low areas. Chlorine is commonly used to purify water, bleach wood pulp, and make other chemicals (NOAA Reactivity 2007). Source: http://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/2862 ALOHA is a computer program designed especially for use by people responding to chemical accidents, as well as for emergency planning and training. Chlorine is a common chemical used in industrial operations and can be found in either liquid or gas form. Rail and truck tankers commonly haul Chlorine to and from facilities. For this scenario, moderate atmospheric and climatic conditions with a slight breeze from the west-southwest were assumed. The target area was chosen due to its proximity to the residential, commercial, and essential facility locations. The geographic area covered in this analysis is depicted in Figure 4-12. Figure 4-12: Location of Chemical Release 96 u W 30 31 x,. 91 Osweg L l s 47 _ C YoAME 1 IF y 77 1 _ 126 t 47 Joll®t y - Legend • Plume origin on Roads Min o Rivers i_ Miles Lakes 0 1.5 3 6 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 75 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Analysis The ALOHA atmospheric modeling parameters, depicted in Figure 4-13, were based upon a westerly wind speed of five miles per hour. The temperature was 70°F with 50% humidity and a cloud cover of five-tenths skies. The source of the chemical spill is a horizontal, cylindrical-shaped tank. The diameter of the tank was set to 10.4 feet and the length set to 53 feet (33,500 gallons). At the time of its release, it was estimated that the tank was 85% full. The chlorine in this tank is in its liquid state. This release was based on a leak from a 2.5-inch-diameter hole, 12 inches above the bottom of the tank. According to the ALOHA parameters, approximately 10,600 pounds of material would be released per minute. The image in Figure 4-14 depicts the plume footprint generated by ALOHA. Figure 4-13: ALOHA Plume Modeling Parameters SITE DATA: Location: PLANO, ILLINOIS Building Air Exchanges Per Hour: 0.48 (unsheltered single storied) Time:June 3, 2010 1515 hours CDT(using computer's clock) CHEMICAL DATA: Chemical Name: CHLORINE Molecular Weight: 70.91 g/mol AEGL-1(60 min): 0.5 ppm AEGL-2(60 min): 2 ppm AEGL-3(60 min): 20 ppm IDLH: 10 ppm Ambient Boiling Point: -30.1° F Vapor Pressure at Ambient Temperature:greater than 1 atm Ambient Saturation Concentration: 1,000,000 ppm or 100.0% ATMOSPHERIC DATA: (MANUAL INPUT OF DATA) Wind: 5 miles/hour from WSW at 3 meters Ground Roughness: open country Cloud Cover: 5 tenths Air Temperature: 70° F Stability Class: B No Inversion Height Relative Humidity: 50% SOURCE STRENGTH: Leak from hole in horizontal cylindrical tank Non-flammable chemical is escaping from tank Tank Diameter: 10.4 feet Tank Length: 53 feet Tank Volume: 33,679 gallons Tank contains liquid Internal Temperature: 70° F Chemical Mass in Tank: 168 tons Tank is 85%full Circular Opening Diameter: 2.5 inches Opening is 12 inches from tank bottom Release Duration:ALOHA limited the duration to 1 hour Max Average Sustained Release Rate: 10,600 pounds/min (averaged over a minute or more) Total Amount Released: 322,402 pounds Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 76 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Note:The chemical escaped as a mixture of gas and aerosol (two phase flow). THREAT ZONE: Model Run: Heavy Gas Red : 5.1 miles --- (20 ppm =AEGL-3(60 min)) Orange: greater than 6 miles --- (2 ppm =AEGL-2(60 min)) Yellow: greater than 6 miles --- (0.5 ppm =AEGL-1(60 min)) Figure 4-14: Plume Footprint Generated by ALOHA miles 7.5 2.5 0 2.5 7.5 5 0 5 10 15 miles >-- 20 ppm = AEGL-3 (60 min) IM >- 2 ppm = AEGL-2 (60 min) >- 0.5 ppm = AEGL-1(60 min) Confidence Lines Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) are intended to describe the health effects on humans due to once-in-a-lifetime or rare exposure to airborne chemicals. The National Advisory Committee for AEGLs is developing these guidelines to help both national and local authorities, as well as private companies, deal with emergencies involving spills or other catastrophic exposures. As the substance moves away from the source, the level of substance concentration decreases. Each color-coded area depicts a level of concentration measured in parts per million (ppm). The image in Figure 4-15 depicts the plume footprint generated by ALOHA in ArcGIS. • AEGL 3: Above this airborne concentration of a substance, it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience life- threatening health effects or death. The red buffer (>20.0 ppm) extends no more than six miles from the point of release after one hour. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 77 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 • AEGL 2: Above this airborne concentration of a substance, it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience irreversible or other serious, long-lasting adverse health effects or an impaired ability to escape. The orange buffer (> 2.0 ppm) extends no more than six miles from the point of release after one hour. • AEGL 1: Above this airborne concentration of a substance, it is predicted that the general population, including susceptible individuals, could experience notable discomfort, irritation, or certain asymptomatic nonsensory effects. However, the effects are not disabling and are transient and reversible upon cessation of exposure. The yellow buffer (> 0.5 ppm) extends more than six miles from the point of release after one hour. • Confidence Lines: The dashed lines depict the level of confidence in which the exposure level will be contained. The ALOHA model is 95% confident that the release will stay within this boundary. Figure 4-15: ALOHA Plume Footprint Overlaid in ArcGIS Kane County 39 d Mo i no E 34 /7 ehlavl _ - - Y.0 47' _ r - Y.0 - _ 47 f Yorkville \'�- '✓ 126 I Legend y1 Plume Origin va AEGL 3—20.0 ppm l �ctMt l AEGL 22.0 ppm 120 AEGL 1—0.5 ppm -- Miles 0 95%Confidence Interval �1 0 1 2 4 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 78 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Results By summing the building inventory within all AEGL levels (AEGL 3: > 20.0 ppm, AEGL 2: > 2.0 ppm and Level 1: > 0.5 ppm.), the GIS overlay analysis predicts that as many as 3,486 buildings could be exposed at a replacement cost of $1.06 billion. If this event were to occur, approximately 9,100 people would be affected. The results are depicted in Figure 4-16. The Assessor records often do not distinguish parcels by occupancy class when the parcels are not taxable; therefore, the total number of buildings and the building replacement costs for government, religious/non-profit, and education may be underestimated. Figure 4-16: Kendall County Building Inventory Classified By Plume Footprint i Kane County i ao — i Mott �hi - "two"two and Santa 4e Ra51[oa. • L • . - t10 � gaclin0t�n1N n t '� • _Q" i Twine S4 r r+ `r�+ YO } 47 -L ! Legend Y �T Oskvirl6e -- AEGL 3 20.0 ppm ':.W. _ 12$ AEGL 2 2.0 ppm G- 71 _ i t —AEGL 1 0.5 ppm • AEGL1 BI i2sti o AEGL2_8I o AEGL3_BI ti\ 71 - Plume Origin = 47 Miles 95%Confidence Interval K'. _ _- 0 1 2 4 Building Inventory Damage The results of the analysis against the building inventory points are depicted in Tables 4-33 through 4-36. Table 4-33 summarizes the results of the chemical spill by combining all AEGL level. Tables 4-34 through 4-36 summarize the results of the chemical spill for each level separately. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 79 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 4-33: Estimated Exposure for all Level (all ppm) Occupancy Population Building Counts Building Exposure Residential 8,120 3,248 $750,994,061 Commercial 0 171 $88,458,684 Industrial 0 18 $184,775,033 Agriculture 0 28 $12,712,362 Religious 0 0 $0 Government 0 8 $8,200,000 Education (1,009) 2 $19,037,700 Total 8,120 31475 $1,064,177,839 Table 4-34: Estimated Exposure for Level 3 (>=20 ppm) Occupancy Population Building Counts Building Exposure Residential 3,880 1,552 $322,264,638 Commercial 0 101 $27,038,880 Industrial 0 15 $162,190,808 Agriculture 0 11 $4,857,168 Religious 0 0 $0 Government 0 2 $3,100,000 Education (489) 1 $8,283,000 Total 3,880 11682 $527,734,494 Table 4-35: Estimated Exposure for Level 2 (>=160 ppm) Occupancy Population Building Counts Building Exposure Residential 3,053 1,221 $305,846,285 Commercial 0 63 $33,088,362 Industrial 0 3 $22,584,225 Agriculture 0 12 $5,711,604 Religious 0 0 $0 Government 0 2 $1,600,000 Education 0 0 $0 Total 3,053 1,301 $368,830,476 Table 4-36: Estimated Exposure for Level 1 (>=30 ppm) Occupancy Population Building Counts Building Exposure Residential 1,188 475 $122,883,138 Commercial 0 7 $28,331,442 Industrial 0 0 $0 Agriculture 0 5 $2,143,590 Religious 0 0 $0 Government 0 4 $3,500,000 Education (520) 1 $10,754,700 Total 1,198 492 $167,612,870 (##)Number of students in effected school,not included in total population. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 80 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Critical Facilities Damage There are six critical facilities within the limits of the chemical spill plume. The affected facilities are identified in Table 4-37. Their geographic locations are depicted in Figure 4-17. Table 4-37: Essential Facilities within Plume Footprint Name Fire Stations Bristol Kendall Fire Station#2 Little Rock Fire Station#3 Little Rock Fox Fire Department#1 Police Stations Plano Police Department Schools Emily G.Johns School P H Miller Elementary School Figure 4-17: Essential Facilities within Plume Footprint Legend AEGL 1 0.5 ppm Kane County AEGL 2>=2.0 ppm AE=GL 3>=20 ppm 95%Confidence Interval Plume origin 30 Effected Essential Facilities Police Station - Mo i Fire Station f ° School j t na 1 s, -- 34 ehlarf -_-° 34 - 1 — "Yo 34 Yo a f" 4ze 71 428 � ✓ f 74 Males 0 1 2 4 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 81 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Hazardous Materials Storage and Transport Hazard Any new development within the county will be vulnerable to these events, especially development along major roadways. Analysis of Community Development Trends Because the hazardous material hazard events may occur anywhere within the county, future development will be impacted. The major transportation routes and the industries located in Kendall County pose a threat of dangerous chemicals and hazardous materials release. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 82 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 4.4.7 Fire Hazard Hazard Definition for Fire Hazard This plan will address three major categories of fires for Kendall County: 1) tire/scrap fires; 2) structural fires; and 3) wildfires. Tire Fires The state of Illinois generates thousands of scrap tires annually. Many of those scrap tires end up in approved storage sites that are carefully regulated and controlled by federal and state officials. However, scrap tires are sometimes intentionally dumped in unapproved locations throughout the state. The number of unapproved locations cannot be readily determined. These illegal sites are owned by private residents who have been continually dumping waste and refuse, including scrap tires, at those locations for many years. Tire disposal sites can be fire hazards, in large part, because of the enormous number of scrap tires typically present at one site. This large amount of fuel renders standard firefighting practices nearly useless. Flowing and burning oil released by the scrap tires can spread the fire to adjacent areas. Tire fires differ from conventional fires in the following ways: • Relatively small tire fires can require significant fire resources to control and extinguish. • Those resources often cost much more than Kendall County government can absorb compared to standard fire responses. • There may be significant environmental consequences of a major tire fire. Extreme heat can convert a standard vehicle tire into approximately two gallons of oily residue that may leak into the soil or migrate to streams and waterways. Structural Fires Lightning strikes, poor building construction, and building condition are the main causes for most structural fires in Indiana. Kendall County has a few structural fires each year countywide. Wildfires When hot and dry conditions develop, forests may become vulnerable to devastating wildfires. In the past few decades an increased commercial and residential development near forested areas has dramatically changed the nature and scope of the wildfire hazard. In addition, the increase in structures resulting from new development strains the effectiveness of the fire service personnel in the county. Previous Occurrences for Fire Hazard Kendall County has not experienced a significant or large-scale explosion at a fixed site or transportation route that has resulted in multiple deaths or serious injuries. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 83 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Geographic Location for Fire Hazard Fire hazards occur countywide and therefore affect the entire county. The forested areas in the county have a higher chance of widespread fire hazard. Hazard Extent for Fire Hazard The extent of the fire hazard varies both in terms of the severity of the fire and the type of material being ignited. All communities in Kendall County are affected by fire equally. Risk Identification for Fire Hazard Based on input from the planning team, a future occurrence of a fire or explosion is possible. According to the RPI, fire/explosion is ranked as the number six hazard. RPI=Probability x Magnitude/Severity. Probability x Magnitude = RPI /Severity 2 x 1 = 2 Vulnerability Analysis for Fire Hazard This hazard impacts the entire jurisdiction equally; therefore, the entire population and all buildings within the county are vulnerable to fires and can expect the same impacts within the affected area. Table 4-9 lists the types and numbers of all essential facilities in the area. A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. The building exposure for Kendall County, as determined from the building inventory, is included in Table 4-10. Because of the difficulty predicting which communities are at risk, the entire population and all buildings have been identified at risk. Critical Facilities All critical facilities are vulnerable to fire hazards. A critical facility will encounter many of the same impacts as any other building within the jurisdiction. These impacts include structural damage from fire and water damage from efforts extinguishing fire. Table 4-9 lists the types and numbers of essential facilities in the area. A map and list of all critical facilities is included as Appendix F. Building Inventory A table of the building exposure in terms of types and numbers of buildings for the entire county is provided in Table 4-10. Impacts to the general buildings within the county are similar to the damages expected to the critical facilities. These impacts include structural damage from fire and water damage from efforts to extinguish the fire. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 84 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Infrastructure During a fire the types of infrastructure that could be impacted include roadways, utility lines/pipes, railroads, and bridges. Since the county's entire infrastructure is equally vulnerable, it is important to emphasize that any number of these items could become damaged during a fire. Potential impacts include structural damage resulting in impassable roadways and power outages. Vulnerability to Future Assets/Infrastructure for Fire Hazard Any future development will be vulnerable to these events. Analysis of Community Development Trends Fire hazard events may occur anywhere within the county, because of this future development will be impacted. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 85 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Section 5 - Mitigation Strategy The goal of mitigation is to reduce the future impacts of a hazard including property damage, disruption to local and regional economies, and the amount of public and private funds spent to assist with recovery. The goal of mitigation is to build disaster-resistant communities. Mitigation actions and projects should be based on a well-constructed risk assessment, provided in Section 4 of this plan. Mitigation should be an ongoing process adapting over time to accommodate a community's needs. 5.1 Community Capability Assessment The capability assessment identifies current activities used to mitigate hazards. The capability assessment identifies the policies, regulations, procedures, programs, and projects that contribute to the lessening of disaster damages. The assessment also provides an evaluation of these capabilities to determine whether the activities can be improved in order to more effectively reduce the impact of future hazards. The following sections identify existing plans and mitigation capabilities within all of the communities listed in Section 2 of this plan. 5.1.1 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Kendall County, all its jurisdictions are members of the NFIP expect Boulder Hill. Boulder Hill does have an identified flood area but has chosen not to participate due to lack of interest or perceived need. Kendall County will continue to educate this jurisdiction on the benefits of the program. HAZUS-MH identified approximately 439 structures are located within the Kendall County Special Flood Hazard Area. However, 2,128 households paid flood insurance, insuring $300,563,000 in property value. The total premiums collected amounted to $1,368,412, which on average was $47,186 annually. From 1978 through 2007, 1,142 claims were filed totaling $9,814,877. The average claim was $8,594. The county and incorporated areas do not participate in the NFIP'S Community Rating System (CRS). The CRS is a voluntary incentive program that recognizes and encourages community floodplain management activities that exceed the minimum NFIP requirements. As a result, flood insurance premium rates are discounted to reflect the reduced flood risk resulting from the community actions meeting the three goals of the CRS: 1) reduce flood losses; 2) facilitate accurate insurance rating; and 3)promote the awareness of flood insurance. Table 5-1 identifies each community and the date each participant joined the NFIP. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 86 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 5-1: Additional Information on Communities Participating in the NFIP Community Participation Date FIRM Date CRS Date CRS Rating Floodplain Ordinance Kendall County 7/19/1982 2/4/2009 NA NA 12/16/2008 Boulder Hill CDP 2/4/2009 NA NA City of Aurora 6/15/1979 2/4/2009 NA NA 6/15/1979 City of Plano 9/30/1976 2/4/2009 NA NA 8/2411998 City of Sandwich 2/27/1984 2/4/2009 NA NA 12/2008 The United City of 6/1/1982 2/4/2009 NA NA 2/24/2009 Yorkville Village of Lisbon 6/11/1982 2/4/2009 NA NA Village of Millbrook 5/13/09 2/4/2009 NA NA Village of 8/15/1979 2/4/2009 NA NA Montgomery Village of Newark 6/1/1982 2/4/2009 NA NA Village of Oswego 9/4/1985 2/4/2009 NA NA Village of Plattville 2/4/2009 NA NA 5.1.2 Stormwater Management Stream Maintenance Ordinance The most recent Stormwater Management Ordinance for Kendall County was enacted in September of 2002. The overall goal of the Stormwater Management Ordinance is to have no change in runoff rate or volume from pre-development conditions. For every development project a stormwater management plan must be created. The stormwater management plan must address the following issues: minimization of increases in runoff volume and rates, water quality and multiple uses, release rates, detention basin outlet design and storage requirements, drainage system design and evaluation, methods of generating runoff hydrographs, wet detention basin design, wetland and dry detention basin design, detention in flood plains,wetland protection, urban area drainage, infiltration practices, and safety an maintenance considerations. Several other jurisdictions within Kendall County have similar stormwater management ordinances except for the Village of Lisbon and Boulder Hill CDP which is not available. 5.1.3 Zoning Management Ordinance The first zoning ordinance for Kendall County was passed on January 16, 1940. The Kendall County zoning ordinance was recently revised in October 19, 2010. The overall goal of the zoning ordinance, which still pertains today, is to promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort and the general welfare of the people of Kendall County. The full text of the zoning ordinance for Kendall County can be found on the county website along with several other ordinances. The website also has links to the other jurisdictions within Kendall County. Table 5-2 summarizes these ordinances and their adoption dates within the county. Table 5-2: Description of Zoning Plans/Ordinances Community Comp Zoning Control of Erosion Water Burning Seismic Bldg. Plan Ord Ord Control Water Ord Ord Stndrds Mgmt Kendall County 7-21-2009 10/19/201 10-21- 7-2006 9-2002 N/A N/A INTL 0 2008 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 87 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Community Comp Zoning Contb of Erosion Stater Burning Seismic Bldg. Plan Ord Ord Control Water Ord Ord Stndrds Mgmt Boulder Hill CDP N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A City of Plano 7/28/1997 9/4/1962 1962 8/24/1998 8/24/1998 1979* N/A INTL City of Sandwich 1983 1983 1983 N/A 1983 1983 N/A INTL City of Yorkville 2008 1994 2004 2003 2010 1976 N/A INTL Village of Lisbon N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Village of Millbrook N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Village of 2003 8-22-1998 2-1991 12-14- 11-14- 8-22- N/A INTL Montgomery 1998 2000 1998* Village of Newark 2008 N/A 8-9-06 N/A N/A N/A N/A INTL Village of Oswego 2009 11-2009 2-2008 1-15-2008 1-15-2008 11-2009* N/A INTL Village of Plattville N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A The date given is the most recent updated version of that ordinance. *The burning ordinance for these jurisdictions are present within either the zoning ordinance or the subdivision control ordinance. 5.1.4 Erosion Management Program/ Policy Kendall County, The United City of Yorkville, Village of Montgomery, and Village of Oswego have plans in place for erosion control and management. 5.1.5 Fire Insurance Rating Programs/ Policy Table 5-3 lists Kendall County's fire departments and respective information. Table 5-3: Kendall County Fire Departments, Ratings, and Number of Firefighters Fire Department Fire Insurance Rating(ISO) Number of Firefighters Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District City of Plano 5/8 70 City of Sandwich 4/8 35 Joliet Fire Station 3/9 212 Lisbon-Seward Fire Protection CO 2 9 31 Little Rock Fox Fire Department Little Rock Fox Fire Station#2 Little Rock Fox Fire Station#3 Newark Fire Protection District 6/9 55 Oswego Fire Protection District 4/9 77 The United City of Yorkville 5/9 77 Village of Millbrook 518 Village of Plattville 9 5.1.6 Land Use Plan Kendall County has a land use plan within the zoning ordinance. The cities of Sandwich, Plano and The United City of Yorkville along with the villages of Montgomery and Oswego address land use within their zoning ordinances as well. Village of Millbrook has a Comprehensive Plan that addresses Land Use issues & zoning. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 88 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 5.1.7 Building Codes Unincorporated Kendall County uses the International Building Code as their guide for building standards. All other jurisdictions within Kendall County also use the International Building Code except for the Village of Lisbon and Boulder Hill whose building codes are not available. 5.2 Mitigation Goals In Section 4 of this plan, the risk assessment identified Kendall County as prone to eight hazards. The MHMP planning team members understand that although hazards cannot be eliminated altogether, Kendall County can work toward building disaster-resistant communities. Following are a list of goals, objectives, and actions. The goals represent long-term, broad visions of the overall vision the county would like to achieve for mitigation. The objectives are strategies and steps that will assist the communities in attaining the listed goals. Goal 1: Lessen the impacts of hazards to new and existing infrastructure (a) Objective: Retrofit critical facilities and structures with structural design practices and equipment that will withstand natural disasters and offer weather-proofing. (b) Objective: Equip public facilities and communities to guard against damage caused by secondary effects of hazards. (c) Objective: Minimize the amount of infrastructure exposed to hazards. (d) Objective: Evaluate and strengthen the communication and transportation abilities of emergency services throughout the community. (e) Objective: Improve emergency sheltering in the community. Goal 2: Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community (a) Objective: Support compliance with the NFIP. (b) Objective: Review and update existing, or create new, community plans and ordinances to support hazard mitigation. (c) Objective: Conduct new studies/research to profile hazards and follow up with mitigation strategies. Goal 3: Develop long-term strategies to educate community residents on the hazards affecting their county (a) Objective: Raise public awareness on hazard mitigation. (b) Objective: Improve education and training of emergency personnel and public officials. 5.3 Mitigation Actions/Projects Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 89 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Upon completion of the risk assessment and development of the goals and objectives, the planning committee was provided a list of the six mitigation measure categories from the FEMA State and Local Mitigation Planning How to Guides. The measures are listed as follows: • Prevention: Government, administrative, or regulatory actions or processes that influence the way land and buildings are developed and built. These actions also include public activities to reduce hazard losses. Examples include planning and zoning, building codes, capital improvement programs, open space preservation, and stormwater management regulations. • Property Protection: Actions that involve the modification of existing buildings or structures to protect them from a hazard or removal from the hazard area. Examples include acquisition, elevation, structural retrofits, storm shutters, and shatter-resistant glass. • Public Education and Awareness: Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about the hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. Such actions include outreach projects, real estate disclosure, hazard information centers, and school-age and adult education programs. • Natural Resource Protection: Actions that, in addition to minimizing hazard losses, preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. These actions include sediment and erosion control, stream corridor restoration, watershed management, forest and vegetation management, and wetland restoration and preservation. • Emergency Services: Actions that protect people and property during and immediately after a disaster or hazard event. Services include warning systems, emergency response services, and protection of critical facilities. • Structural Projects: Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the impact of a hazard. Such structures include dams, levees, floodwalls, seawalls, retaining walls, and safe rooms. After Meeting #3, held June 9, 2010, MHMP members were presented with the task of individually listing potential mitigation activities using the FEMA evaluation criteria. The MHMP members brought their mitigation ideas to Meeting #4 which was held August 11, 2010. The evaluation criteria(STAPLE+E) involved the following categories and questions. Social: • Will the proposed action adversely affect one segment of the population? • Will the action disrupt established neighborhoods, break up voting districts, or cause the relocation of lower income people? Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 90 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Technical: • How effective is the action in avoiding or reducing future losses? • Will it create more problems than it solves? • Does it solve the problem or only a symptom? • Does the mitigation strategy address continued compliance with the NFIP? Administrative: • Does the jurisdiction have the capability (staff, technical experts, and/or funding) to implement the action, or can it be readily obtained? • Can the community provide the necessary maintenance? • Can it be accomplished in a timely manner? Political: • Is there political support to implement and maintain this action? • Is there a local champion willing to help see the action to completion? • Is there enough public support to ensure the success of the action? • How can the mitigation objectives be accomplished at the lowest cost to the public? Legal: • Does the community have the authority to implement the proposed action? • Are the proper laws, ordinances, and resolution in place to implement the action? • Are there any potential legal consequences? • Is there any potential community liability? • Is the action likely to be challenged by those who may be negatively affected? • Does the mitigation strategy address continued compliance with the NFIP? Economic: • Are there currently sources of funds that can be used to implement the action? • What benefits will the action provide? • Does the cost seem reasonable for the size of the problem and likely benefits? • What burden will be placed on the tax base or local economy to implement this action? • Does the action contribute to other community economic goals such as capital improvements or economic development? • What proposed actions should be considered but be "tabled" for implementation until outside sources of funding are available? Environmental: • How will this action affect the environment(land, water, endangered species)? • Will this action comply with local, state, and federal environmental laws and regulations? • Is the action consistent with community environmental goals? 5.4 Implementation Strategy and Analysis of Mitigation Projects Implementation of the mitigation plan is critical to the overall success of the mitigation planning process. The first step is to decide, based upon many factors, which action will be undertaken first. In order to pursue the top priority first, an analysis and prioritization of the actions is Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 91 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 important. Some actions may occur before the top priority due to financial, engineering, environmental, permitting, and site control issues. Public awareness and input of these mitigation actions can increase knowledge to capitalize on funding opportunities and monitoring the progress of an action. In Meeting #4, the planning team prioritized mitigation actions based on a number of factors. A rating of high, medium, or low was assessed for each mitigation item and is listed next to each item in Table 5-5. The factors were the STAPLE+E (Social, Technical, Administrative, Political, Legal, Economic, and Environmental) criteria listed in Table 5-4. Table 5-4: STAPLE+E planning factors S—Social Mitigation actions are acceptable to the community if they do not adversely affect a particular segment of the population,do not cause relocation of lower income people,and if they are compatible with the community's social and cultural values. T—Technical Mitigation actions are technically most effective if they provide a long-term reduction of losses and have minimal secondary adverse impacts. A—Administrative Mitigation actions are easier to implement if the jurisdiction has the necessary staffing and funding. P—Political Mitigation actions can truly be successful if all stakeholders have been offered an opportunity to participate in the planning process and if there is public support for the action. L—Legal It is critical that the jurisdiction or implementing agency have the legal authority to implement and enforce a mitigation action. E—Economic Budget constraints can significantly deter the implementation of mitigation actions.Hence,it is important to evaluate whether an action is cost-effective,as determined by a cost benefit review, and possible to fund. E—Environmental Sustainable mitigation actions that do not have an adverse effect on the environment,comply with federal,state,and local environmental regulations,and are consistent with the community's environmental goals,have mitigation benefits while being environmentally sound. For each mitigation action related to infrastructure, new and existing infrastructure was considered. Additionally, the mitigation strategies address continued compliance with the NFIP. While an official cost benefit review was not conducted for any of the mitigation actions, the estimated costs were discussed. The overall benefits were considered when prioritizing mitigation items from high to low. An official cost benefit review will be conducted prior to the implementations of any mitigation actions. Table 5-5 presents mitigation projects developed by the planning committee, as well as actions that are ongoing or already completed. Since this is the first mitigation plan developed for Kendall County, there are no deleted or deferred mitigation items. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 92 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Table 5-5: Mitigation Strategies Mitigation Item Goals and Objects Satisfied Hazards Jurisdictions Covered Priority Comments Addressed Goal: Improve emergency communications with the public Kendall County, All critical facilities are equipped with weather Require critical facilities to Tornado, Boulder Hill,Plano, radios.The county would like to develop a have weather radios Objective:Evaluate and strengthen Thunderstorm Sandwich,Yorkville, Ongoing program to distribute weather radios to the the communication and Lisbon, Montgomery, public as well and will solicit funding from IEMA transportation abilities of emergency Newark,Oswego and FEMA. services throughout the county. Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community New stream gauges are being installed on Install stream gauges Objective:Conduct new Flood Kendall County Ongoing tributaries to Fox River: Little Rock Creek,Big studies/research to profile hazards Rock Creek,Blackberry Creek and follow up with mitigation strategies. Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community Establish mutual aid Objective:Review and update Winter Storm, Kendall County Ongoing The county has mutual aid agreements in place existing,or create new,community agreements Hazmat for hazmat incidents and snow removal. plans and ordinances to support hazard mitigation. Goal: Develop long-term strategies to educate the community residents Tornado, Flood, Create a database for on the hazards affecting their county Earthquake, The county keeps a database for senior citizens Thunderstorm, with special needs.There are continued identification of special Winter Storm, Kendall County Ongoing attempts to create a similar database for non- needs population Objective:Improve education and Drought, senior residents. training of emergency personnel and Hazmat,Fire public officials. Goal: Develop long-term strategies to educate the community residents Conduct public education on the hazards affecting their county After 9-11,the county conducted extensive regarding nearby nuclear Hazmat Kendall County Ongoing public education. power plant Objective:Raise public awareness on hazard mitigation. Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards All state highways have snow fences.The to new and existing infrastructure county would like to build additional snow Build snow fences along fences along the following roads:Grover Road, roads to mitigate drifting Objective:Equip public facilities and Winter Storm Kendall County Ongoing Plainfield Road, Ridge Road,Wolf Road, County Line Road,and Plains Road. Funding snow communities to guard against will be sought from the highway department and damage caused by secondary ILDOT. If funding is available,implementation effects of hazards. will begin within three years. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 93 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Mitigation Item Goals and Objects Satisfied Hazards Jurisdictions Covered Priority Comments Addressed Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community The county has developed a number of Develop stormwater stormwater management ordinances(including management ordinances Objective:Review and update Flood Kendall County In for Ausable Creek)and updates them on a and plans existing,or create new,community Progress regular basis.The county will continue to use plans and ordinances to support local resources to develop stormwater management plans for each community. hazard mitigation. Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards on at risk populations. Plano,Sandwich, Establish warming and Drought,Winter Kendall County communities are equipped with cooling centers Storm Yorkville, Montgomery, Complete warming and cooling centers. Objective: Improve emergency Oswego sheltering in the community. Goal: Improve communication to the public. Tornado, Flood, Earthquake, Install Reverse 911 for mass Thunderstorm, Objective:Evaluate and strengthen Drought,Winter Kendall County Complete The county has a Reverse 911 system. notification the communication and Storm, Ha irate transportation abilities of emergency Fire services throughout the county. Goal: Improve First Responder communication. Establish a system to alert Tornado oulder Hill, Plano, First responders in the northern part of the o, first responders of Objective:Evaluate and strengthen Sandwich,Yorkville, Complete county are alerted by Skywarn in conjunction emergencies the communication and Thunderstorm Montgomery,Oswego with Chicago systems. transportation abilities of emergency services throughout the county. Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards Tornado, Flood, Kendall County, Earthquake, to the community. Boulder Hill, Plano, Establish safe rooms in Thunderstorm, Sandwich,Yorkville, Complete The county has safe rooms in all critical critical facilities Objective: Improve emergency Drought,Winter Lisbon, Montgomery, facilities. sheltering in the community. Storm, Hazmat, Newark,Oswego Fire Goal:Create new or revise existing Buy out homes in areas that plans/maps for the community Homes along Fox River in Montgomery have have frequent flooding Flood Montgomery Complete been bought out. Objective:Support compliance with the NFIP for each jurisdiction. Institute a buy-out plan for The County EMA and Floodplain Managers will repetitive loss properties in Goal:Create new or revise existing oversee the implementation of the project. Black Hawk Springs and plans/maps for the community Funding has not been secured as of 2010 but along Oswego Fox River Flood Kendall County High will be sought from funding sources such as and Blackberry Creek;move Objective:Support compliance with IEMA. Implementation, if funding is available,is Farnsworth House(historical the NFIP for each jurisdiction. forecasted to begin within five years. site)to a new location Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 94 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Mitigation Item Goals and Objects Satisfied Hazards Jurisdictions Covered Priority Comments Addressed The County and other jurisdictions will oversee the implementation of this project.Local Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards Tornado, Flood, Kendall County, resources will be used to determine which Purchase transfer switches to new and existing infrastructure Earthquake, Boulder Hill,Plano, facilities should receive generators.Funding to provide back-up power to Sandwich,Yorkville, High has not been secured as of 2010,but the pre- critical facilities Objective:Improve emergency Thunderstorm, Lisbon, Montgomery, disaster mitigation program and community sheltering in the community. Winter Storm Newark,Oswego development grants are possible funding sources. If funding is available,this project is forecasted to begin within one year. Goal: Develop long-term strategies Tornado, Flood, to educate the community residents Earthquake, The County EMA will oversee this project. Establish CERT teams and on the hazards affecting their county Thunderstorm, Funding will be sought from FEMA and IEMA. If procure funding for training Kendall County High and equipment Objective:Improve education and Winter Storm, funding is available,implementation will begin training of emergency personnel and Hazmat, Fire, within one year. public officials. Drought Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards to new and existing infrastructure Kendall County, Install lightning suppression, The County EMA will oversee this project. Plano, power conditioning,and Boulder Hill, Funding will be sought from community grants surge protection in critical Objective:Retrofit critical facilities Thunderstorm Sandwich,Yorkville, High and local resources.If funding is available, facilities with structural design practices and Lisbon, Montgomery, implementation will begin within five years. equipment that will withstand natural Newark,Oswego disasters and offer weather-proofing. Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards Tornado, Flood, to new and existing infrastructure Earthquake, The County EMA will work with first responders Implement Nixle for mass to implement Nixle.Funding for public media release via e-mail Objective:Evaluate and strengthen Thunderstorm, Kendall County High education may be sought from FEMA. If and text messages the communication and Winter Storm, resources are available,implementation will transportation abilities of emergency Hazmat, Fire, begin within one year. services throughout the county. Drought Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards The County EMA will work with engineers to to new and existing infrastructure Kendall County, oversee the implementation of this project. Tornado, Flood, Boulder Hill,Plano, Funding has not been secured as of 2010,but Establish secure mobile Objective:Retrofit critical facilities Earthquake, Sandwich,Yorkville, Medium federal,state,and community development classrooms with structural design practices and Thunderstorm, Lisbon, Montgomery, grants are possible funding sources. equipment that will withstand natural Winter Storm Newark,Oswego Implementation, if funding is available,will disasters and offer weather-proofing. begin within three years. Goal: Improve communications Tornado, Flood, The County EMA will oversee implementation between First Responders. Earthquake, of this project.Local resources will be used to Improve communications Thunderstorm, develop an interoperability plan. Funding for interoperability Objective:Evaluate and strengthen Drought,Winter Kendall County Medium exercises and training may be sought from the communication and state resources. If funding and resources are transportation abilities of emergency Storm, Hazmat,Fire available,implementation will begin within three services throughout the county. years. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 95 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Mitigation Item Goals and Objects Satisfied Hazards Jurisdictions Covered Priority Comments Addressed Goal: Improve communication with The County EMA and County Highway the public. Departments oversee the implementation of this Procure temporary signage project.Local resources will be used as much to use during power outages Objective:Equip public facilities and Flood Kendall County Medium as possible and additional funding will be or warn of road closure communities with means to guard sought from the PDM program. Implementation, against damage caused by if funding is available,is forecasted to begin seconda effects of hazards. within three years. Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards Conduct stream and ditch to new and existing infrastructure Boulder Hill,Plano, The County Engineer will oversee this project. maintenance along all Sandwich,Yorkville, The U.S.Army Corps of Engineers and the streams in developed areas Objective:Evaluate and strengthen Flood Lisbon, Montgomery, Medium DNR are potential funding sources. If funding is Newark O the communication and available,implementation will begin within three of the county transportation abilities of emergency ewar , swego years. services throughout the county. Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community The County EMA will work with the highway Conduct a commodity flow department to complete this project. Funding study Objective:Conduct new Hazmat Kendall County Medium will be sought from ILDOT.If funding is studies/research to profile hazards available,implementation will begin within three and follow up with mitigation years. strategies. Goal:Create new or revise existing Establish best practices for plans/maps for the community County officials will establish and document burying power lines in new Objective:Conduct new Winter Storm Kendall County Low best practices using local resources. If resources are available,implementation will subdivisions studies/research to profile hazards begin within five years. and follow up with mitigation strategies. Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards The County EMA and County Highway Procure emergency to new and existing infrastructure Tornado, Flood, Departments oversee the implementation of this operation system/switches Objective:Evaluate and strengthen Earthquake, Kendall County Low project.Funding will be sought from federal and for traffic signals(manual Thunderstorm, state agencies. Implementation,if funding is control) the communication and transportation abilities of emergency Winter Storm available,is forecasted to begin within five services throughout the county. years. Improve condition of Wolf Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards The County Highway Department will oversee to new and existing infrastructure Road by installing new Flood Kendall County Low this project.Funding will be sought from DNR, culverts and/or elevating the Objective:Minimize the amount of FEMA,and IEMA.If funding is available, road infrastructure exposed to hazards. implementation will begin within five years. Goal: Lessen the impacts of hazards The County EMA and County Highway Improve signage and signals to new and existing infrastructure Department oversee the implementation of this at intersections with frequent project.Funding will be sought from federal and accidents:34 and 30;71 Objective:Evaluate and strengthen Hazmat Kendall County Low state agencies. Implementation,if funding is and 34 the communication and transportation abilities of emergency available,is forecasted to begin within five services throughout the county. I years. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 96 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Mitigation Item Goals and Objects Satisfied Hazards Jurisdictions Covered Priority Comments Addressed Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community Plano currently has no evacuation plan.City Develop an evacuation plan Objective: Review and date Hazmat Plano Low resources will be used to develop and publicize up for hazmat incidents the plan. If resources are available, existing,or create new,community implementation will begin within five years. plans and ordinances to support hazard mitigation. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 97 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 The Kendall County Emergency Management will be the local champions for the mitigation actions. The County Commissioners and the city and town councils will be an integral part of the implementation process. Federal and state assistance will be necessary for a number of the identified actions. 5.5 Multi-Jurisdictional Mitigation Strategy As a part of the multi-hazard mitigation planning requirements, at least two identifiable mitigation action items have been addressed for each hazard listed in the risk assessment and for each jurisdiction covered under this plan. Each of the nine incorporated communities within and including Kendall County was invited to participate in brainstorming sessions in which goals, objectives, and strategies were discussed and prioritized. Each participant in these sessions was armed with possible mitigation goals and strategies provided by FEMA, as well as information about mitigation projects discussed in neighboring communities and counties. All potential strategies and goals that arose through this process are included in this plan. The county planning team used FEMA's evaluation criteria to gauge the priority of all items. A final draft of the disaster mitigation plan was presented to all members to allow for final edits and approval of the priorities. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 98 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Section 6 - Plan Maintenance 6.1 Monitoring, Evaluating, and Updating the Plan Throughout the five-year planning cycle, the Kendall County Emergency Management Agency will reconvene the MHMP planning committee to monitor, evaluate, and update the plan on an annual basis. Additionally, a meeting will be held during February 2011 to address the five-year update of this plan. Members of the planning committee are readily available to engage in email correspondence between annual meetings. If the need for a special meeting, due to new developments or a declared disaster occurs in the county, the team will meet to update mitigation strategies. Depending on grant opportunities and fiscal resources, mitigation projects may be implemented independently by individual communities or through local partnerships. The committee will review the county goals and objectives to determine their relevance to changing situations in the county. In addition, state and federal policies will be reviewed to ensure they are addressing current and expected conditions. The committee will also review the risk assessment portion of the plan to determine if this information should be updated or modified. The parties responsible for the various implementation actions will report on the status of their projects, and will include which implementation processes worked well, any difficulties encountered, how coordination efforts are proceeding, and which strategies should be revised. Updates or modifications to the MHMP during the five-year planning process will require a public notice and a meeting prior to submitting revisions to the individual jurisdictions for approval. The plan will be updated via written changes, submissions as the committee deems appropriate and necessary, and as approved by the county commissioners. The GIS data used to prepare the plan was obtained from existing county GIS data as well as data collected as part of the planning process. This updated HAZUS-MH GIS data has been returned to the county for use and maintenance in the county's system. As newer data becomes available, this updated data will be used for future risk assessments and vulnerability analyses. 6.2 Implementation through Existing Programs The results of this plan will be incorporated into ongoing planning efforts since many of the mitigation projects identified as part of this planning process are ongoing. Kendall County and its incorporated jurisdictions will update the zoning plans and ordinances listed in Table 5-2 as necessary and as part of regularly scheduled updates. Each community will be responsible for updating its own plans and ordinances. 6.3 Continued Public Involvement Continued public involvement is critical to the successful implementation of the MHMP. Comments from the public on the MHMP will be received by the EMA director and forwarded to the MHMP planning committee for discussion. Education efforts for hazard mitigation will be ongoing through the EMA. The public will be notified of periodic planning meetings through notices in the local newspaper. Once adopted, a copy of this plan will be maintained in each jurisdiction and in the County EMA Office. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 99 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 APPENDICES Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 100 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Glossary of Terms A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A AEGL—Acute Exposure Guideline Levels ALOHA—Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres B BFE—Base Flood Elevation C CAMEO—Computer-Aided Management of Emergency Operations CEMA—County Emergency Management Agency CEMP—Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan CERI—Center for Earthquake Research and Information CRS—Community Rating System D DEM—Digital Elevation Model DFIRM—Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map DMA—Disaster Mitigation Act E EAP—Emergency Action Plan ERPG—Emergency Response Planning Guidelines EMA—Emergency Management Agency EPA—Environmental Protection Agency F FEMA—Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM—Flood Insurance Rate Maps FIS—Flood Information Study G GIS—Geographic Information System Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 101 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 H HAZUS-MH—Hazards USA Multi-Hazard HUC—Hydrologic Unit Code I IDNR—Illinois Department of Natural Resources IEMA—Illinois Emergency Management Agency IDOT-Illinois Department of Transportation M MHMP—Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan N NCDC—National Climatic Data Center NEHRP—National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program NFIP—National Flood Insurance Program NOAA—National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration P PPM Parts Per Million R RPI Risk Priority Index S SPC—Storm Prediction Center SWPPP—Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan U USGS—United States Geological Survey Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 102 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Appendix A: Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Meeting Minutes Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 103 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 IEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan Assembly of the Kendall County Planning Team Meeting 1: Chairman: Terry Tichava, Emergency Management Director Plan Directors: SIUC Geology Department and IUPUI - Polis Meeting Date: March 10, 2010 Meeting Time: 1 pm Place: Kendall County Sheriff's Office: Public Safety Center, 1102 Cornell Lane, Yorkville, IL Planning Team/Attendance: Jonathan Remo SIUC Geology Megan Carlson SIUC Geology Lynette Bergeron Village of Plattville/Ken Com Dave Farris Kencom Public Safetly Dispatch William Dostor Plainfield PD John Konopek Plainfield PD Jim Jensen Oswego PD Terry Tichava Kendall Co. EMA Jeff Spang Little Rock-Fox Fire Protection District Jeff Warren Oswego Fire Protection District Lowell Mathre Newark Fire Michael Hitzemann Bristol Kendall Fire Jerry A Dugeon Kendall Co. PB&Z Rich Hart Yorkville PD Bill King Sandwich Fire Joe Gillespie Kendall Sheriffs/EMA Mike Doerzaph Aurora PD Jonathan Whowell Plano PD Tracy Page Kendall Sheriff/EMA Introduction to the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Planning Process The meeting is called to order Narrative: A power-point presentation was given by Jonathan Remo. He explained that this project is in response to the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. The project is funded by a grant awarded by FEMA. A twenty-five percent match will be required from the county to fund this project. The county match will be met by sweat equity and GIS data acquired from the County Assessor's Office. The sweat equity will be an accumulation of time spent at the meetings, on Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 104 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 research assignments, surveys, along with the time spent reviewing and producing the planning document. Jonathan Remo introduced the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Website to the planning team. A username and password was given to the planning team, which will grant them access to the web site. The web site is used to schedule meetings,post contact information and download material pertaining to the planning process. Jonathan Remo divided the planning project into five to six meetings. At the 1St meeting, the planning team will review critical facility maps. The planning team will be asked to research and verify the location of all critical facilities within the county. Jonathan stated that public participation is very important throughout the planning process. He explained that all of the meetings are open to the public but there will be a particular effort made to invite the public to the 3rd meeting. At that meeting, the SIUC Geology Department will present historic accounts of natural disasters that have affected this area. At the 2nd meeting the discussion will focus on natural disasters that are relevant to this area. These hazards will be given a probability rating and ranked by their occurrence and potential level of risk. Polis and SIUC Geology will research these hazards and present them to the planning team. The 3rd meeting is publicized in order to encourage public participation. Polis and SIUC Geology will produce a risk assessment in draft form; each planning team member will get a copy. Also they will present strategies and projects that FEMA and other counties have undertaken for the planning team to review. The 4th meeting consists of a brain storming session focused on disasters that were analyzed in the risk assessment report. The Planning Team will list strategies and projects that could be implemented to mitigate the potential hazards that threaten the county. FEMA requires that for every identified hazard, a strategy to mitigate the loss and damage must be in place. The strategies may range from educational awareness to hardening a building or building a levee. After the 4th meeting the plan will be in its final draft form. At the 5th meeting the planning team will need to review the plan prior to sending it to IEMA. IEMA will review the plan and will make recommendation to it as they see fit, then it is submitted to FEMA for review and approval. Once the plan has been submitted to FEMA, local governments are eligible to apply for grants to mitigate these established hazards. After FEMA approves the plan, it is sent back to the Planning Team. At the 6th meeting the Planning Team will present the Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan to the County Board for adoption. Incorporated communities must either adopt the county plan or prepare its own plan, in order to access mitigation assistance from FEMA. The communities are encouraged to participate and contribute to development of the plan. Once the County Board has adopted the plan, each incorporated community will have the opportunity to adopt the plan as well. Jonathan Remo then introduced Megan Carlson of SIUC. Megan Carlson presented three maps that identified critical facilities in the county. She asked the planning team to come up to review the maps to identify any corrections that need to be made to the maps. She assigned research homework arranged by categories to individual planning team members to locate missing or incorrect critical facilities. Meeting was adjourned. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 105 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 t 1A. w Z Tj µ } kN ?C tr} z ir R 0 u (p� Ln r_. w4 4 V4 IN 17, m pfd � �G Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 106 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 IEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan Assembly of the Kendall County Planning Team Meeting 2: Chairman: Terry Tichava,Emergency Management Director Plan Directors: SIUC Geology Department and IUPUI -Polis Meeting Date: April 14, 2010 Meeting Time: 1 pm Place: Kendall County Sheriff's Office: Public Safety Center, 1102 Cornell Lane, Yorkville, IL Planning Team/Attendance: Jonathan Remo SIUC Geology Megan Carlson SIUC Geology Stan Laken Kendall County Dane Farris Kencom 911 Emergency Communications Lowell Mathre Newark Fire Department Michael Hitzemann Bristol-Kendall Fire Department Lynette Bergeron Kencom/Village of Plattville Dave Delaney Yorkville PD Donald Schwartzkopf Yorkville PD Rich Hart Yorkville PD LT Jonathan Whowell Plano PD Chief T. Tichava Kendall SO/EMA John Konopek Plainfield PD/EMA Jerry A. Dudgeon Kendall County PBC James Jenson Oswego PD William R. King Sandwich Fire Department Jeff Spang Little Rock-Fix Fire Protection District Tracy Page Kendall County The meeting was called to order. Jonathan Remo began the meeting by re-introducing the objectives of the PDM Planning document. The planning document is mandated as a result of the"Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000". Jonathan stated that the objective of the meeting was to prioritize a list of disasters that are relevant to Kendall County. Jonathan Remo provided the planning team with a handout to direct the focus of the meeting discussion. As Jonathan began to conduct the prioritizing process, he described the risk assessment ranking that FEMA has established. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 107 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Narrative: The Planning Team was then asked to assess and rank the hazards that could potentially befall Kendall County using the risk priority index (RPI). The identified hazards were ranked as followed for Kendall County: #1: Thunderstorms/High Winds/Hail/Lightening #2: Tornado #3: Transportation Hazardous Material Release #4: Flooding #5: Winter Storms #6: Fire/Explosion #7: Earthquake Narrative: The planning team was then asked to analyze the historical weather events that have been plotted on a map of the county and communities therein. No corrections were noted by the planning team. The planning team agreed to complete any missing information pertaining to critical facilities by the next meeting. Meeting was adjourned. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 108 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ' U r Z f. , u . � cj {� 7 o , tr r A � � O i w r Ln L LI Lt A In 11 _-Z7 0 J rl r p ( O L3 t I W i r c _ 7G ti4 N A L Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 109 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 IEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan Assembly of the Kendall County Planning Team Meeting 3: Chairman: Terry Tichava, Emergency Management Director Plan Directors: SIUC Geology Department and IUPUI - Polis Meeting Date: June 9, 2010 Meeting Time: 1 pm Place: Kendall County Sheriff's Office: Public Safety Center, 1102 Cornell Lane, Yorkville, IL Planning Team/Attendance: Jonathan Remo SIUC Geology Beth Ellison SIUC Geology Donald P. Scwartzkopf Yorkville PD Dave Delaney Yorkville PD Matt Schwy Kendall County Record Terry Tichava Kendall County SO/EMA Jerry H. Dudgeon Kendall County PBZ John Sterrett Kendall County PBZ Michael Hitzemann Bristol-Kendall Fire Department Don Clayton Kendall County Jim Jenson Oswego PD Jeff Warren Oswego Fire Department David Farris Kencom Jonathan Whowell Plano PD Jeff Spang Little Rock-Fox FPD Lynette Bergeron KencomNillage of Plattville The meeting was called to order. Jonathan Remo opened the meeting with an overview of the planning process and the roles of SIU and the Polis Center. Then he went on to explain the topics and objectives of the current meeting. Jonathan first presented the planning team with the list of hazards that the team had ranked by their level of risk from the previous meeting. He also presented a power point presentation of the history of Kendall County's past disasters. This included covering each hazard that the County had focused on, the history of each and then the mitigation strategies. He defined mitigation as the act of avoidance and preparedness. A draft of the Kendall County Mitigation Plan and a copy of Mitigation Ideas,produced by FEMA Region 5 in July 2002, were given to each of the planning team members for review. It was explained by Jonathan the contents of the booklet and that each of the planning team members should return to meeting 4 with three mitigation strategies for each of the hazards identified by the planning team. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 110 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Jonathan Remo then asked the audience for questions or comment. After some discussion about the plan and how it would affect the community and its residents, he thanked those who came and a closed the presentation. Meeting was adjourned. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 111 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 cbm in c t j N IL 7 rd ■ a G 4j it If 4 r k_� I - '_ , J r, 1 dro Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 112 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 IEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan Assembly of the Kendall County Planning Team Meeting 4: Chairman: Terry Tichava, Emergency Management Director Plan Directors: SIUC Geology Department and IUPUI—Polis Meeting Date: August 11, 2010 Meeting Time: 1 pm Place: Kendall County Sheriff's Office: Public Safety Center, 1102 Cornell Lane, Yorkville, IL Attendance: Jonathan Remo SIUC Geology Beth Elision SIUC Geology John Buechler IUPUI—Polis John Sterrett Kendall County PBZ Michael Hitzemann Bristol-Kendall Fire Department Larry Hilt Yorkville PD Joe Gillespie Kendall County Dane Farris Kencom Lynette Bergeron KencomNillage of Plattville Lowell Mathre Newark Fire Department Bill King Sandwich Fire Department Don Clayton Kendall County GIS Tracy Page Kendall County Stan Laken Kendall County Tech Terry Tichava Kendall County SO/EMA Dave Delaney Yorkville PD Jon Whowell Plano PD James Jenson Oswego PD Jeff Spang Little Rock-Fox FPD The meeting was called to order. Jonathan Remo thanked everyone for attending the meeting and stated that if the planning team members needed extra mitigation strategy handbooks that they were available upon request. He introduced John Buechler from the Polis Center that was in attendance that day also. Jon Remo began by explaining that today's meeting would cover mitigation strategies that the planning team believed would prevent or eliminate the loss of life and property. He explained that the planning team should not make any reservations in the form of money or resources when developing this list. John Buechler stepped in to direct the mitigation ideas brainstorming period. Whenever possible, the planning team was directed to be specific about the location or focus area of a strategy, in respect to being within a municipality or county wide. Each hazard was addressed one at a time. The planning team listed new and current on-going mitigation Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 113 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 strategies in respect to each hazard. The planning team prioritized mitigation actions based on a number of factors. A rating of High, Medium, or Low was assessed for each mitigation item. Listed below are the New Mitigation Strategies that the Planning Team came up with: Mitigation Item Goals and Objects Satisfied Hazards Jurisdictions Covered Priority Addressed Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards to new and existing infrastructure Kendall County, Require critical facilities to Tornado, Boulder Hill,Plano, have weather radios Objective: Evaluate and strengthen Thunderstorm Sandwich,Yorkville, Ongoing the communication and Lisbon, Montgomery, transportation abilities of emergency Newark,Oswego services throughout the county. Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community Install stream gauges Objective:Conduct new Flood Kendall County Ongoing studies/research to profile hazards and follow up with mitigation strategies. Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community Establish mutual aid Winter Storm, agreements Objective: Review and update Hazmat Kendall County Ongoing existing,or create new,community plans and ordinances to support hazard mitigation. Goal: Develop long-term strategies Tornado, Flood, to educate the community residents Earthquake, Create a database for on the hazards affecting their county Thunderstorm, identification of special Winter Storm, Kendall County Ongoing needs population Objective: Improve education and Drought, training of emergency personnel and Hazmat, Fire public officials. Goal: Develop long-term strategies Conduct public education to educate the community residents on the hazards affecting their county regarding nearby nuclear Hazmat Kendall County Ongoing power plant Objective: Raise public awareness on hazard mitigation. Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards to new and existing infrastructure Build snow fences along roads to mitigate drifting Objective: Equip public facilities and Winter Storm Kendall County Ongoing snow communities to guard against damage caused by secondary effects of hazards. Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community Develop stormwater In management ordinances Objective: Review and update Flood Kendall County Progress and plans existing,or create new,community plans and ordinances to support hazard mitigation. Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards Establish warming and on at risk populations. Drought,Winter Plano,Sandwich, cooling centers Storm Yorkville, Montgomery, Complete Objective: Improve emergency Oswego sheltering in the community. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 114 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Mitigation Item Goals and Objects Satisfied Hazards Jurisdictions Covered Priority Addressed Goal: Improve communication to the public. Tornado, Flood, Earthquake, Install Reverse 911 for mass Thunderstorm, notification Objective: Evaluate and strengthen Drought,Winter Kendall County Complete the communication and Storm, Hazmat, transportation abilities of emergency Fire services throughout the county. Goal: Improve First Responder communication. Establish a system to alert Tornado, Boulder Hill,Plano, first responders of Objective: Evaluate and strengthen Sandwich,Yorkville, Complete emergencies the communication and Thunderstorm Montgomery,Oswego transportation abilities of emergency services throughout the county. Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards Tornado, Flood, Kendall County, Earthquake, to the community. Boulder Hill,Plano, Establish safe rooms in Thunderstorm, critical facilities Drought,Winter Sandwich,Yorkville, Complete Objective: Improve emergency Storm, Hazmat, Lisbon, Montgomery, sheltering in the community. Fire Newark,Oswego Goal:Create new or revise existing Buy out homes in areas that Plans/maps for the community have frequent flooding Flood Montgomery Complete Objective:Support compliance with the NFIP for each jurisdiction. Institute a buy-out plan for repetitive loss properties in Goal:Create new or revise existing Black Hawk Springs and plans/maps for the community along Oswego Fox River Flood Kendall County High and Blackberry Creek;move Objective:Support compliance with Farnsworth House(historical the NFIP for each jurisdiction. site)to a new location Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards Tornado, Flood, Kendall County, Purchase transfer switches to new and existing infrastructure Earthquake, Boulder Hill,Plano, to provide back-up power to Sandwich,Yorkville, High critical facilities Objective: Improve emergency Thunderstorm, Lisbon, Montgomery, sheltering in the community. Winter Storm Newark,Oswego Goal: Develop long-term strategies Tornado, Flood, to educate the community residents Earthquake, Establish CERT teams and on the hazards affecting their county Thunderstorm, procure funding for training Winter Storm, Kendall County High and equipment Objective: Improve education and Hazmat, Fire, training of emergency personnel and Drought public officials. Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards Install lightning suppression, to new and existing infrastructure Kendall County, power conditioning,and Boulder Hill,Plano, surge protection in critical Objective: Retrofit critical facilities Thunderstorm Sandwich,Yorkville, High facilities with structural design practices and Lisbon, Montgomery, equipment that will withstand natural Newark,Oswego disasters and offer weather-proofing. Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards Tornado, Flood, to new and existing infrastructure Earthquake, Implement Nixle for mass Thunderstorm, media release via e-mail Objective: Evaluate and strengthen Kendall County High and text messages the communication and Winter Storm, transportation abilities of emergency Hazmat, Fire, services throughout the county. Drought Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards to new and existing infrastructure Kendall County, Tornado, Flood, Boulder Hill,Plano, Establish secure mobile Objective: Retrofit critical facilities Earthquake, Sandwich,Yorkville, Medium classrooms with structural design practices and Thunderstorm, Lisbon, Montgomery, equipment that will withstand natural Winter Storm Newark,Oswego disasters and offer weather-proofing. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 115 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Mitigation Item Goals and Objects Satisfied Hazards Jurisdictions Covered Priority Addressed Goal: Improve communications between First Responders. Tornado, Flood, Earthquake, Improve communications Thunderstorm, interoperability Objective: Evaluate and strengthen Drought,Winter Kendall County Medium the communication and Storm, Hazmat, transportation abilities of emergency Fire services throughout the county. Goal: Improve communication with the public. Procure temporary signage to use during power outages Objective: Equip public facilities and Flood Kendall County Medium or warn of road closure communities with means to guard against damage caused by secondary effects of hazards. Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards Conduct stream and ditch to new and existing infrastructure Boulder Hill,Plano, maintenance along all Objective: Evaluate and strengthen Flood Sandwich,Yorkville, Medium streams in developed areas the communication and Lisbon, Montgomery, of the county transportation abilities of emergency Newark,Oswego services throughout the county. Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community Conduct a commodity flow Objective:Conduct new Hazmat Kendall County Medium study studies/research to profile hazards and follow up with mitigation strategies. Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community Establish best practices for burying power lines in new Objective:Conduct new Winter Storm Kendall County Low subdivisions studies/research to profile hazards and follow up with mitigation strategies. Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards Procure emergency to new and existing infrastructure Tornado, Flood, operation system/switches Objective: Evaluate and strengthen Earthquake, Kendall County Low for traffic signals(manual the communication and Thunderstorm, control) transportation abilities of emergency Winter Storm services throughout the county. Improve condition of Wolf Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards Road by installing new to new and existing infrastructure culverts and/or elevating the Flood Kendall County Low road Objective: Minimize the amount of infrastructure exposed to hazards. Goal:Lessen the impacts of hazards Improve signage and signals to new and existing infrastructure at intersections with frequent Objective: Evaluate and strengthen Hazmat Kendall County Low accidents: 34 and 30;71 the communication and and 34 transportation abilities of emergency services throughout the county. Goal:Create new or revise existing plans/maps for the community Develop an evacuation plan for hazmat incidents Objective: Review and update Hazmat Plano Low existing,or create new,community plans and ordinances to support hazard mitigation. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 116 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 so r 4 T r M C7 r �4 v �7 J b a 7 � A Qj t w 3 1 cr -.f Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 117 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 IEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan Assembly of the Kendall County Planning Team Meeting 5: Chairman: Terry Tichava,Emergency Management Director Plan Directors: SIUC Geology Department and IUPUI—Polis Meeting Date: October 13, 2010 Meeting Time: 1 pm Place: Kendall County Sheriff's Office: Public Safety Center, 1102 Cornell Lane, Yorkville, IL Planning Team/Attendance: Lynette Bergeron Kencom/Village of Plattville Cpt. James Jenson Oswego PD D.C. Dave Delaney Yorkville PD Chief Rich Hart Yorkville PD Lt. Don Schwartkopf Yorkville PD D.C. Larry Hilt Yorkville PD Terry Tichava Kendall County EMA Jeff Spang LRFFPD Bill Perkins Oswego FPA Dave Farris Kencom Don Clayton Kendall County GIS Stan Laken Kendall County Technical Tracy Page Kendall EMA Joe Gillespie Kendall EMA Jackie Lemmerhirt-Kowalski Village of Millbrook John Sterrett Kendall PBZ The meeting was called to order. Terry Tichava opened the meeting with an overview of what was to happen from this point on with the plan. He stated that the plan could be reviewed by the Planning Team members for about 2 weeks so everyone would have ample amount of time look at and review the plan for any discrepancies. He also stated that in approximately 3 weeks the plan would be sent to IEMA/FEMA. They would then review it and if everything is OK with the plan, then we should hear back from IEMA/FEMA hopefully by October for their approval. Terry then explained that once it comes back approved, then a Resolution will have to be passed by all municipalities. After they are passed, they needed to be returned Terry and he will forward them on to FEMA. Once FEMA gets the Resolutions, they will send notification that the municipality has a completed and approved plan. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 118 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 He also explained that once the plan is submitted to IEMA/FEMA for their review, the municipalities can begin formulating and putting together their projects for funding. . It was also explained to the planning team that FEMA will require a five-year update to the plan. Terry told the planning team that in another five years,the members should come together again, most likely under the direction of the ESDA Director, to review the plan and make any necessary changes to it. He explained that FEMA will probably send out a reminder as to when this is supposed to take place. After Terry explained the above process, he pointed out specific tables and places in the plan that needed clarification from the team members. After discussing a few changes, the planning team members looked at the plan for a while longer. Since there were no more comments about the plan, the meeting was adjourned. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 119 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 tZ tt r9 rA Illy 34 A i f"� s +�+ 4 3 4 v ' V 'j -1 a "J �J k r Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 120 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Appendix B: Local Newspaper Articles and Photographs Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 121 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 8 -ee Multi Hazard commi. 411 will hold planning session Ageticy �FEIYIA) now rcgwres each -unit. The Kendall Ct)urrty° Multi-Hazard of -overnmer l in Else United 'States to 1 iligatit.;R Ste�crilIg �'�*MInittCe will I)Mt h,av e a FE N1,A-approved MHSIP. a public itrf TIMat4)n and strategy 'The MHl+ ? will scree as frarneWOA planning -,es-swot RL I p.m. tan fOr developing h Ard. mitigation prgicL is 1yc(Aoe.ylay. June 9 at the Kendall County that will reduce the neglative impacts of &herifr�, orfitiu_ 1 It)'- Cornell Lane. future disasters on the communities and Yorkville. unincorporatcd areas of the covnt�- Through a grant, Kendall Courrty C xamples. of projects that have been H[Iiergenev M.Inagerrtent Agency has completed by SaLtrkme rummunities include foTTned in alliance '-wills The Polis Centt;r storm shelters, wartiing. sirens. flood of Indiana Univcrsity-Purdue t flkersity walls.and Eire prow.Li enhaneernenis,. Indianapolis OUPO) and S-Outhern The :steering contrnittee has identified 111.1n ris University-Car'tHAULtle 10 idcntifv the ftalltwrirt hazard~; tornadoes, potential natural haa.ards and T43 produce a thundcrstoTinsIhi winclslhail, hazardous mitigation plan wo addres,s the issues rtiatcrials release, dr Ll_-hI!eX(rtnte heal 'Fhe trnguing efforts of the paratcrship and severe winter storey _'1;he cornmitle.c will resv.lt in a hluki-Hazard �+d itiSatiod Ihett selectu d hazard-. ."Or The Nlis Center I'lano NEW), which will Lek To to madel, with FIAZU�- H, a GI -t sed identify potential nattaral hazards fOr risk tni igtaiun tool developed by Kendall CottrttY, acrd then establish a FEMA. HAZL!S-NIH is capable of tititiga;t[L)n rrleasure that is Ultemied to prc+ ictirkg the probable imp;3ct5 of reduce Or elimmate the negative impact specific disaster.: in terms of fi.natteial, that a parrieular hazard may hatrc on tla-z hutttan life, and sAfety impacts, a:3 well Irwalky. as various,pthrrs. ()vcr the last several rt Unths the Once the plan is completed, the ,'we ring c rttmittee lras been working commicter will submit it io FENIA for with Tl'W Polis Center and staff froal the approval- 'The cotmraittec will also ww•ork SJU-Carrbondale Geology Deparcment of to develfop funding for any mitigation develi,sp a lvlti-Hazard Mitigation Piro ac:tivides that are identified_ (N4HMP) f(jr the cl)unty to sulamit to the The public is invited to attend the June Federall Emergency "Ian gc!1nent gerioy 9 meeting and the steering Gonimittee is for approval. interested in receiving public input an The l;edcrai Emergency Mttreagemertt the plan. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 122 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Appendix C: Adopting Resolutions Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 123 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, Kendall County recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, Kendall County participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Commissioners hereby adopt the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Kendall County Emergency Management Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of , 2010. County Commissioner Chairman County Commissioner County Commissioner Attested by: County Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 124 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, Boulder Hill CDP recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, Boulder Hill CDP participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Boulder Hill CDP hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Management Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of 52010. City Mayor City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member Attested by: City Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 125 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Aurora recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, the City of Aurora participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Aurora hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Management Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of , 2010. City Mayor City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member Attested by: City Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 126 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Village of Lisbon recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, the Village of Lisbon participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Lisbon hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Service and Disaster Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of , 2010. Village President Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Attested by: Village Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 127 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Village of Millbrook recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, the Village of Millbrook participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Millbrook hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Service and Disaster Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of , 2010. Village President Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Attested by: Village Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 128 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Village of Montgomery recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, the Village of Montgomery participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Montgomery hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Service and Disaster Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of , 2010. Village President Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Attested by: Village Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 129 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Village of Newark recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, the Village of Newark participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Newark hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Service and Disaster Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of , 2010. Village President Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Attested by: Village Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 130 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Village of Oswego recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, the Village of Oswego participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Oswego hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Service and Disaster Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of , 2010. Village President Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Attested by: Village Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 131 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Plano recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, the City of Plano participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Plano hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Management Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of 12010. City Mayor City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member Attested by: City Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 132 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Village of Plattville recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, the Village of Plattville participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Plattville hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Service and Disaster Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Emergency Management and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of , 2010. Village President Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Village Council Member Attested by: Village Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 133 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Sandwich recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, the City of Sandwich participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Sandwich hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Management Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of , 2010. City Mayor City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member Attested by: City Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 134 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Resolution# ADOPTING THE KENDALL COUNTY MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, The United City of Yorkville recognizes the threat that natural hazards pose to people and property; and WHEREAS, undertaking hazard mitigation actions before disasters occur will reduce the potential for harm to people and property and save taxpayer dollars; and WHEREAS, an adopted multi-hazard mitigation plan is required as a condition of future grant funding for mitigation projects; and WHERAS, The United City of Yorkville participated jointly in the planning process with the other local units of government within the County to prepare a Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that The United City of Yorkville hereby adopts the Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan as an official plan; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Kendall County Emergency Management Agency will submit on behalf of the participating municipalities the adopted Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan to the Illinois Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for final review and approval. ADOPTED THIS Day of , 2010. City Mayor City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member City Council Member Attested by: City Clerk Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 135 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Appendix D: NCDC Historical Hazards Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 136 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Kendall County Picture Index FLOOD File Name: Flood 1954 Plano 1 Event: Flood Date: October 26, 1954 Description: Flood Causes Thousands of dollars of damage to Plano Disposal Plant. The torrential rain of 10 inches on the weekend of October 9 and 10 and the subsequent flood caused serious damage to the Plano disposal plant. Photo shows how the plant was surrounded by water when the creek poured over its bank. Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society File Name: Flood-1954—Plano-2 Event: Flood Date: October 26, 1954 Description: Flood Causes Thousands of dollars of damage to Plano Disposal Plant. The torrential rain of 10 inches on the weekend of October 9 and 10 and the subsequent flood caused serious damage to the Plano disposal plant. Photo shows the collapsed wall of the plant. The damage has been estimated between $40,000 and $70,00. Cities officials are now seriously pondering the problem... Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 137 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 a Irk s i File Name: Flood-1857—Aurora Event: Flood Date: February 5, 1857 Description: Looking west from east bank of Fox River after the flood of February 5, 1857. No. 1 was new Wilder House;No. 2 was Wm. A. Tanner house, now our Museum; No. 3 was original Episcopal Church; No. 4, the D. Valentine house;No. 5, the old swimming hole on Stalp Island;No. 6. B.F. Hall residence;No. 7, Millrace; No. 8, old ice house. Source: "The Aurora story"written and compiled by Vernon Derry for the Aurora Bicentennial Commission Found at Yorkville Public Library i File Name: Flood-1857—Aurora-2 Event: Flood Date: February 5, 1857 Description: Flood of 1857 covered Island, looking west from foot of old Main street (East Galena Blvd.) Eagle Mills was on site of Leath& Co. Arro points to original Church on Sacred heart. Aurora's first substantial Catholic Church building (1855-1869). After a bad fire, the parish built St. Mary's. Source: "The Aurora story"written and compiled by Vernon Derry for the Aurora Bicentennial Commission Found at Yorkville Public Library Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 138 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 I f y man ,": •Y File Name: Flood 1857—Aurora-3 Event: Flood Date: February 5, 1857 Description: Looking west downtown Aurora during flood of 1857 which inundated entire Stolp Island with water and ice. Blackhawk Mill was on site of present YWCA building. Note first story of Woodworth Wagon Works (arrow)under construction. Source: "The Aurora story"written and compiled by Vernon Derry for the Aurora Bicentennial Commission Found at Yorkville Public Library = u VV File Name: Flood-1887—Kendall Event: Flood Date: 1887 Description: Floods in Fox River damaged North Avenue bridge in 1887 Source: "The Aurora story"written and compiled by Vernon Derry for the Aurora Bicentennial Commission Found at Yorkville Public Library Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 139 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 5.:. s File Name: Flood—1937_Yorkville Event: Flood Date: 1937 Description: Yorkville fireman pump water out of the old millrace on the Blackberry Dam in this 1937 photo (Photo courtesy of Duane Hayden) Source: A Pictorial History of Yorkville, Illinois 1836-1968 Volume 1 Found at Yorkville Public Library WINTER STORM s a - n fff � U File Name: Snow_1943_Inscho Event: Snow storm Date: January, 1943 Description: A blizzard in January, 1943 left the Inscho School building surround by snow- and classes cancelled (Photo courtesy of Dorothy Chambers) Source: A History of Yorkville, Illinois 1836-1936 by Lucinda Tio and Kathy Farren Published for Yorkvill's Sesquicentennial July, 1986 Found at Yorkville Public Library Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 140 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 File Name: Snow 1967 Kendall 1 Event: Snow storm Date: January 27, 1967 Description: Snow piled up to unbelievable heights during the 1967 storm. Downtown Yorkville faced some tough parking problems when the snow was cleared off Rt. 47 onto the curbs. Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society �A .f s� File Name: Snow_1977_Kendall_2 Event: Snow storm Date: January 27, 1967 Description: Snow piled up to unbelievable heights during the 1967 storm. Art Thanepohn, then Kendall Township Highway Commissioner, provided us with this picture showing just how much snow he and his crews moved off area roads. Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 141 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 n File Name: Snow 1918 Kendall Event: Snow storm Date: 1918 Description: This view of a Fox and Illinois Union Railroad train with a snow attachment is from the collection of Gerbart Bierts. The snowy wither shown is a 1918 storm. Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society TORNADO File Name: Tornado_1968_Kendall_I Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: Damage was severe in Prairie View subdivision where most of the houses suffered some sort of damage Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 142 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 File Name: Tornado 1968 Kendall 2 Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: Damage was severe in Praire View subdivision where most of the houses suffered some sort of damage Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society File Name: Tornado-1968—Kendall-3 Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: Garage ruined in Yorkville Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 143 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 A File Name: Tornado 1968 Kendall 4 Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society ■s File Name: Tornado-1968—Kendall-5 Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: A freak of a storm. Albert Wykes points to a bean stock that pierced this tree on his property. The stalk blew from a field across the road. It is so imbedded that it is impossible to pull out. Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 144 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 . � s File Name: Tornado-1968—Kendall-6 Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: Paragon Pluming on Route 34 west of Plano lost the back end of its building to the storm. This portion of the building M. and Mrs. William Puckett, owners of the business, had stored a valuable collection of antiques. The wall on the left collapsed on them. Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society File Name: Tornado-1968—Kendall-7 Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: About 100 pigs were lost when this barn collapsed from the wind pressure. Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 145 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 File Name: Tornado 1968 Kendall 8 Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: This new bart is on Kennedy Road east of Route 47 Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society File Name: Tornado-1968—Kendall-9 Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: This home is in the Schumacher subdivision Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 146 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 1 V T �r File Name: Tomado_1968_Kendall_10 Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: In Yorkville this tree split two ways. One part hit the house and the other pit the car. Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society File Name: Tornado_1968_Kendall_I 1 Event: Tornado Date: May 15, 1968 Description: This is a section of a roof of a house in Rock Creek. The neighbors roof can be seen on the roof of a home across the street. Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 147 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 THUNDERSTORM/HAIL/WIND File Name: Hail 1965 Plano 1 Event: Hail/Wind Date: August 1965 Description: 100 M.P.H wind, rain, hail storm lashes Plano and surrounding area Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society 1 File Name: Hail_1965_Plano_2 Event: Hail/Wind Date: August 1965 Description: 100 M.P.H wind, rain, hail storm lashes Plano and surrounding area Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 148 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 '4 �,a• rte- ;' File Name: Hail 1965—Plano-3 Event: Hail/Wind Date: August 1965 Description: 100 M.P.H wind, rain, hail storm lashes Plano and surrounding area Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Ir' N,. File Name: Hail_1965_Plano_4 Event: Hail/Wind Date: August 1965 Description: 100 M.P.H wind, rain, hail storm lashes Plano and surrounding area Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 149 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 FIRE File Name: Fire-1887—Yorkville Event: Fire Date: March, 1887 Description: The Courthouse after the fire in March, 1887 Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society File Name: Fire-1972—Yorkville Event: Fire Date: October 1972 Description: $ 500,000 fire in Yorkville. Spectacular Blaze destroys box factory Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 150 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 File Name: Fire-1972—Yorkville-2 Event: Fire Date: October 1972 Description: $ 500,000 fire in Yorkville. Spectacular Blaze destroys box factory Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society OTHER File Name: Train_1970_Kendalll Event: Freight Train Derailment Date: July 1970 Description: Freight Train Derailed Source: Kendall County Record AND Kendall County Historical Society Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 151 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 WE c. n File Name: DamFailure_1978_Yorkville Event: Dam Failure Date: April 10, 1978 Description: The United City of Yorkville crews faced a tough job on April 10, 1978 when they had to repair a water leak under the river. A temporary dam was built across part of the river and Bristo-Kendall fireman helped pump water away from the area being repaired (Photo courtesy of the city) Source: A Pictorial History of Yorkville, Illinois 1836-1968 Volume 1 Found at Yorkville Public Library File Name: Train_1970_Yorkville_1 Event: Train Derailment Date: Description: Looking south of Main Street, this photo shows how fr off the tracks some of the derailed cars landed. (Photo courtesy of Lew Riley) Source: A Pictorial History of Yorkville, Illinois 1836-1968 Volume 1 Found at Yorkville Public Library Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 152 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 File Name: Train 1970 Yorkville—2 Event: Train Derailment Date: 1970 Description: Derailed train cars narrowly missed hitting the side of Haggerty's Department Store on Bridge Street. (Photo courtesy of Lew Riley) Source: A Pictorial History of Yorkville, Illinois 1836-1968 Volume 1 Found at Yorkville Public Library r File Name: Train_1970_Yorkville_3 Event: Train Derailment Date: 1970 Description: Track was torn up along the side of Haggerty's Store when the train derailed in 1970. (Photo courtesy of Lew Riley) Source: A Pictorial History of Yorkville, Illinois 1836-1968 Volume 1 Found at Yorkville Public Library Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 153 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 File Name: Train-1970—Yorkville-4 Event: Train Derailment Date: 1970 Description: One of the derailed cars slammed into the front of the Wunsch Clinic. (Photo courtesy of Lew Riley) Source: A Pictorial History of Yorkville, Illinois 1836-1968 Volume 1 Found at Yorkville Public Library Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 154 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Appendix E: Historical Hazard Maps -see attached map. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 155 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Appendix F: List of Critical Facilities Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 156 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Communication Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class Owner Function ReplaCost 1 WQDZ709 FRAZIER ROAD, 1 MILE WEST PLANO CDFLT A BEEP, LLC 0 2 WQDZ709 PLANO CDFLT A BEEP, LLC 0 2 MILES SOUTH OF RT.52 IN 3 WQK1908 SEWARD TOWNSHI SEWARD TOWNSHIP CDFLT A BEEP, LLC 0 4 WQK1908 SEWARD TOWNSHIP CDFLT A BEEP, LLC 0 5 KNKG720 10916 Walker Road YORKVILLE CDFLT AMS Spectrum Holdings, LL 0 6 KNKH915 10916 WALKER ROAD YORKVILLE CDFLT AMS Spectrum Holdings, LL 0 7 KSC271 2 3/4 MI SE SANDWICH CDFLT ANR PIPELINE COMPANY 0 8 KSD80 2.75 MI SE OF SANDWICH CDFLT ANR PIPELINE COMPANY 0 9 KSD90 5 1/4 MI SE OF AURORA CDFLT ANR PIPELINE COMPANY 0 CORNER OF RT 52&COUNTY 10 KOF387 LINE RD MINOOKA CDFLT BERNHARD, LEO 0 11 WQIY949 BNSF LS1 MP43.8 HBD Bristol CDFLT BNSF Railway Co 0 12 WPJY795 RAILROAD MILEPOST 43.8 BRISTOL CDFLT BNSF Railway Company 0 13 WQDM412 Yorkville CDFLT Bristol Kendall Fire Prot 0 14 WQDM412 Yorkville CDFLT Bristol Kendall Fire Prot 0 15 WQDM412 Yorkville CDFLT Bristol Kendall Fire Prot 0 16 WQDM412 Yorkville CDFLT Bristol Kendall Fire Prot 0 17 WQKY556 YORKVILLE CDFLT BRISTOL KENDALL FIRE PROT 0 18 WPJX890 9274 GALENA RD BRISTOL CDFLT BRUCHER& RICKLEFF BROS 1 0 19 WPJX890 BRISTOL CDFLT BRUCHER& RICKLEFF BROS 1 0 20 KNGH613 .7 S OF IL RT 71 ON IL RT 47 YORKVILLE CDFLT BRUMMEL, RICHARD A 0 21 WNVW548 RT 30 & RT 34 OSWEGO CDFLT CANNONBALL MECHANICAL INC 0 22 WNVW548 OSWEGO CDFLT CANNONBALL MECHANICAL INC 0 AURORA PLANT BLDG G RT 23 KAS496 31 AURORA CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE 1 0 24 KD42242 CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE 1 0 25 KD43452 CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE 1 0 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 157 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Owner Function ReplaCost 26 KFH244 RT 31 1/2 MI S OF RT 30 AURORA CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE 1 0 27 KFH244 AURORA CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE 1 0 28 KTF583 IL RT 31 1/2 MI S OF RT 30 AURORA CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE 1 0 29 WNUB208 CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE 1 0 30 WNXC682 CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE 1 0 31 WPKZ226 RT 31 .2 KM S OF RT 30 AURORA CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE 1 0 32 WPXJ707 AURORA CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE, 0 33 WPXJ707 YORKVILLE CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE, 0 34 WPXJ707 PLANO CDFLT CATERPILLAR OF DELAWARE, 0 35 WHA590 DOUGLAS RD OSWEGO CDFLT Chicago Comnet Corp 0 36 KNKA549 10916 WALKER RD YORKVILLE CDFLT Chicago SMSA LP 0 37 KNKA549 1650 W RT 126 PLAINFIELD CDFLT Chicago SMSA LP 0 38 KNKA549 7335 Rt. 71 Yorkville CDFLT Chicago SMSA LP 0 39 WQGK977 Ridge Road Water Tower Joliet CDFLT City of Joliet 0 40 WQFU769 PLANO CDFLT CITY OF PLANO IL 0 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM 41 WQLB997 280 State Route 31 Oswego CDFLT HOLDIN 0 CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM 42 142 Kirkland CIR Oswego CDFLT HOLDIN 0 43 WPPY924 CDFLT COMBINED AGENCY RESPONSE 0 COMMONWEALTH EDISON 44 WPQQ636 11440 Corniels Road Plano CDFLT COMPA 0 COMMONWEALTH EDISON 45 WPSH227 1301 No County Line Rd Minooka CDFLT COMPA 0 COMMONWEALTH EDISON 46 WSS47 11440 CORNIELS RD PLANO CDFLT COMPA 0 COMMONWEALTH EDISON 47 WPSH227 1301 No County Line Rd Minooka CDFLT COMPA 0 Corner of Rt 52 and County Line COOK DUPAGE 48 WQEL763 Rd Minooka CDFLT TRANSPORTATIO 0 COOK DUPAGE 49 WQEL763 Minooka CDFLT TRANSPORTATIO 0 50 WPTG391 YORKVILLE CDFLT COUNTRYSIDE VETERINARY CL 0 51 WQGV722 1401 COUNTY LINE ROAD MINOOKA CDFLT DYNEGY IT INC. 0 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 158 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Owner Function ReplaCost 52 WQGV722 MINOOKA CDFLT DYNEGY IT INC. 0 53 WPIK959 2 MI S OF RT 52 SEWARD TOWNSHIP CDFLT ESP Wireless Technology G 0 54 WPIK959 SEWARD TOWNSHIP CDFLT ESP Wireless Technology G 0 2 MILES SOUTH OF RT.52 IN 55 WPBB463 SEWARD TOWNSHI SEWARD TOWNSHIP CDFLT FCI 900, Inc. 0 56 WPBB463 SEWARD TOWNSHIP CDFLT FCI 900, Inc. 0 2 MILES SOUTH OF RT.52 IN 57 WPTU725 SEWARD TOWNSHI SEWARD TOWNSHIP CDFLT FCI 900, INC. 0 58 WPTU725 SEWARD TOWNSHIP CDFLT FCI 900, INC. 0 59 WPWF734 RT 52 and County Line Rd Minooka CDFLT FCI 900, Inc. 0 60 WPWF734 Minooka CDFLT FCI 900, Inc. 0 61 WPWF782 2 Miles S of RT 52 Minooka CDFLT FCI 900, Inc. 0 62 WPWF782 Minooka CDFLT FCI 900, Inc. 0 63 WQHW626 280 State Route 31 Oswego CDFLT FCI 900, INC. 0 64 WQHW626 Oswego CDFLT FCI 900, INC. 0 65 WQHW716 6849 Rt. 34 Oswego CDFLT FCI 900, INC. 0 66 WQHW716 Oswego CDFLT FCI 900, INC. 0 67 WQHW965 9316 Rte 34 Yorksville CDFLT FCI 900, INC. 0 68 WQHW965 Yorksville CDFLT FCI 900, INC. 0 69 WQHX209 "Lot 4, Kendall Point Business Oswego CDFLT FCI 900, INC. 0 70 WQHX209 Oswego CDFLT FCI 900, INC. 0 Corner of Rt 52 and County Line 71 WPYR436 Rd Minooka CDFLT Ferrari Equipment Company 0 72 WPYR436 MINOOKA CDFLT Ferrari Equipment Company 0 73 WPJS421 1215 DEER ST YORKVILLE CDFLT First Student, Inc. 0 74 WPJS421 YORKVILLE CDFLT First Student, Inc. 0 JCT OF RT 34&WOLF 75 WPLE455 CROSSING OSWEGO CDFLT FOX BEND GOLF COURSE 0 76 WPLE455 OSWEGO CDFLT FOX BEND GOLF COURSE 0 FOX METRO WATER 77 KYX872 RT 31 S OSWEGO CDFLT RECLAMATI 0 78 WPUE362 1179 Wolf Rd Oswego CDFLT Frieders, Donald K 0 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 159 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Owner Function ReplaCost 79 WPUE362 Oswego CDFLT Frieders, Donald K 0 80 KNIX538 PRATT RD 1 MI W PLANO CDFLT FRIEDERS, GENE 0 81 WQFK332 OSWEGO CDFLT GAP INC 0 82 WNSK382 2 MI S OF RT 52 MINOOKA CDFLT GRAINCO FS INC 0 83 WNSK382 MINOOKA CDFLT GRAINCO FS INC 0 84 WQEH624 2353 CREEK RD PLANO CDFLT HINSDALE NURSERIES INCORP 0 85 WQEH624 PLANO CDFLT HINSDALE NURSERIES INCORP 0 86 WQHD876 3080 Route 34 Oswego CDFLT HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. 0 87 WQIU818 735 EDWARD LANE YORKVILLE CDFLT HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. 0 91 M W OF LEGION RD AT 88 WPKG583 EMMANUEL YORKVILLE CDFLT Illinois Public Safety Ne 0 89 KNIF498 13608 FOX RD PLANO CDFLT ILLINOIS, STATE OF 0 SILVER SPRINGS STATE 90 KV0604 PARK 2 MI S PLANO CDFLT ILLINOIS, STATE OF 0 91 WQHG919 FRAZIER RD 1M1 W PLANO CDFLT ILLINOIS-CENTRAL SCHOOL B 0 92 WQHG919 PLANO CDFLT ILLINOIS-CENTRAL SCHOOL B 0 93 KSA358 CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 COURT HOUSE RIDGE & 94 KSA358 MADISON STS YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 COUNTY JAIL MAIN & 95 KSA358 MADISON STS YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 COR OF LEGION RD AND 96 WNXD763 EMMANUEL RD KENDALL TOWNSHIP CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 97 WNXD763 KENDALL TOWNSHIP CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 COR OF LEGION RD AND 98 WNXJ276 EMMANUEL RD KENDALL TOWNSHIP CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 99 WNXJ276 KENDALL TOWNSHIP CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 100 WNXJ276 1580 ROUTE 34 OSWEGO CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 300 FT W OF INT LEGION & 101 WNYS788 EMMANUL RDS YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 102 WNYS788 YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 103 WPAK257 CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 160 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Owner Function ReplaCost 300 FT W OF INT OF LEGION 104 WPAK294 & EMMANUAL RDS YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 105 WPAK294 YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 106 WPB1878 1102 CORNELL ST YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 107 WPB1878 YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 108 WPWW497 YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 LEGION ROAD, 350 FT WEST 109 WPWW499 OF IMMANUAL RD YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 110 WPWW499 1102 CORNEL LANE YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 111 WPWW499 YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 112 WPWW499 1580 ROUTE 34 OSWEGO CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 113 WQLD369 804 W JOHN ST YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 114 WQLD369 YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 115 WQU458 1102 CORNELL LN YORKVILLE CDFLT KENDALL, COUNTY OF 0 116 WNVW778 9274 GALENA RD BRISTOL CDFLT L J DODD CONSTRUCTION INC 0 117 WNVW778 BRISTOL CDFLT L J DODD CONSTRUCTION INC 0 118 WQBM267 2623 Eldamain Rd Plano CDFLT Menards Inc 0 119 WQBM267 Plano CDFLT Menards Inc 0 120 WQBM267 Plano CDFLT Menards Inc 0 METROPOLITAN AREA 121 WQJD316 1349 A Faxon Rd Plano CDFLT NETWORK 0 METROPOLITAN AREA 122 WQJD317 6797 Route 34 Oswego CDFLT NETWORK 0 7150 Plainfield Rd. (Kendall METROPOLITAN AREA 123 WQJD318 Cnty Line# PLAINFIELD CDFLT NETWORK 0 16535 Ridge Road (Minooka METROPOLITAN AREA 124 WQJD323 #92112) MINOOKA CDFLT NETWORK 0 METROPOLITAN AREA 125 WQJD368 280 Rt. 31 Montgomery CDFLT NETWORK 0 METROPOLITAN AREA 126 WQJE749 142 Kirkland Circle Oswego CDFLT NETWORK 0 METROPOLITAN AREA 127 WQJE758 6980 Minkler Rd. Yorkville CDFLT NETWORK 0 METROPOLITAN AREA 128 WQJE759 6359 Route 47 Yorkville CDFLT NETWORK 0 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 161 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Owner Function ReplaCost 129 KPH987 ROUTE 1 PLANO CDFLT NELSON ENTERPRISES, INC. 0 130 WLF899 FRAXIER RD & LAURIE LN 'PLANO CDFLT NELSON ENTERPRISES, INC. 0 131 WL1620 FRAZIER& LAURIE LANE PLANO CDFLT NELSON ENTERPRISES, INC. 132 WPQQ601 1 BROADCAST CENTER PLANO CDFLT NELSON ENTERPRISES, INC. 133 WPUV819 One Broadcast Center Plano CDFLT NELSON MULTIMEDIA, INC. 134 KNKA760 7694 IMMANUEL ROAD YORKVILLE CDFLT NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS 135 KNKA760 47 STONEHILL DRIVE OSWEGO CDFLT NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS 136 WPFV582 CDFLT NEWARK AMBULANCE DISTRICT COR OF RT 52 AND COUNTY 137 KNAJ944 LINE RD MINOOKA CDFLT Nextel License Holdings 4 138 KNAJ944 MINOOKA CDFLT Nextel License Holdings 4 139 WNHJ780 8115 RT 47 YORKVILLE CDFLT Nextel License Holdings 4 140 WNIZ784 9274 GALENA ROAD BRISTOL CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 141 WNIZ784 BRISTOL CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 142 WPFF516 1 BRDCAST CTR FRAZIER RD PLANO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 143 WPFF516 PLANO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 144 WPOF253 ONE BROADCAST CENTER PLANO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 145 WPOF253 PLANO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 146 WPPJ352 6359 ROUTE 47 YORKVILLE CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 147 WPPJ352 YORKVILLE CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 148 WPPJ353 280 ROUTE 31 OSWEGO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 149 WPPJ353 OSWEGO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 150 WPPJ360 10318 GALENA ROAD BRISTOL CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 151 WPPJ360 BRISTOL CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 "LOT 4, KENDALL POINT 152 WPPJ454 BUSINESS" OSWEGO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 153 WPPJ454 OSWEGO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 154 WPPJ469 6849 RT. 34 OSWEGO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 155 WPPJ469 OSWEGO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 162 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Owner Function ReplaCost 156 WPSY696 5725 RTE 126 YORKVILLE CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 157 WPSY696 YORKVILLE CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 158 WPSY697 9316 RTE 34 YORKSVILLE CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 159 WPSY697 YORKSVILLE CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 160 WPSY698 13349 A FAXON RD PLANO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 161 WPSY698 PLANO CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 162 WPSY852 997 W. RTE.#126 PLAINFIELD CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 163 WPSY852 PLAINFIELD CDFLT NEXTEL LICENSE HOLDINGS 4 164 WQB1303 1525 Harvey Rd. Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 165 WQB1303 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 166 WQB1303 61 Franklin St. Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 167 WQB1303 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 168 WQB1303 4250 Route 71 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 169 WQB1303 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 170 WQB1303 570 Colchester Drive Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 171 WQB1303 26923 W. Grande Park Blvd. Plainfield CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 172 WQB1303 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 173 WQB1303 Plainfield CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 174 WQB1303 440 BOULDER HILL PASS DR. OSWEGO CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 175 WQB1303 OSWEGO CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 176 WQBQ861 Montgomery CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 177 WQBQ861 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 178 WQBQ861 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 179 WQBQ861 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 180 WQBQ861 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 181 WQBQ861 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 182 WQBQ861 Montgomery CDFLT Oswego Community Unit Sch 183 WQEX644 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Fire Protection Di Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 163 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Owner Function ReplaCost 184 WQEX644 Oswego CDFLT Oswego Fire Protection Di 185 WPBG274 9274 GALENA RD BRISTOL CDFLT OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT 30 186 WPBG274 BRISTOL CDFLT OSWEGO SCHOOL DISTRICT 30 187 WNVE268 113 S MAIN ST OSWEGO CDFLT OSWEGO, VILLAGE OF 188 WNVE268 OSWEGO CDFLT OSWEGO, VILLAGE OF 189 WNVE268 3525 RT 34 OSWEGO CDFLT OSWEGO, VILLAGE OF 190 WPOQ725 VARIOUS LOCATIONS OSWEGO CDFLT OSWEGO, VILLAGE OF 191 WQHV410 Yorkville CDFLT PDQLink 192 WQHV410 Yorkville CDFLT PDQLink 193 WQHV410 Yorkville CDFLT PDQLink 194 WQHV410 Yorkville CDFLT PDQLink 195 WQHV410 Oswego CDFLT PDQLink 196 WQHV410 Oswego CDFLT PDQLink 197 WQGM894 7 E. MAIN ST. PLANO CDFLT PLANO, CITY OF 198 WQGM894 1102 CORNELL LN. YORKVILLE CDFLT PLANO, CITY OF 199 WQGM894 PLANO CDFLT PLANO, CITY OF 200 WQF1655 2810 US HIGHWAY 34 OSWEGO CDFLT PORTILLO'S HOT DOGS, INC. 201 WPUC392 804 S HALE PLANO CDFLT PRECISION CARGO 202 WPUC392 PLANO CDFLT PRECISION CARGO 203 WPXX858 1855 MARKETVIEW DRIVE YORKVILLE CDFLT QSC MGMT. GROUP, INC. 204 WPFC911 PRATT RD 1 MI W PLANO CDFLT SANDWICH COMMUNITY UNIT S 205 WPFC911 PLANO CDFLT SANDWICH COMMUNITY UNIT S 206 KZJ603 RT 47&LEGION RD YORKVILLE CDFLT SCHMITT, RANDALL 207 WNQL213 9274 GALENA RD BRISTOL CDFLT SCHMITT, RANDALL Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 164 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Dams Report ID Name River City Owner Purpose Height[ft] ReplaCost 1 MILHURST LAKE DAM TRIB FOX RIVER MILLING W.W. Rice R 20 2 YORKVILLE DAM FOX RIVER YORKVILLE Illinois Department of Na R 12 3 BLACK BERRY CREEK DAM BLACK BERRY CREEK YORKVILLE IL DEPT OF CONSERVATION R 18 Electric Power Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class Function Stories YearBuilt ReplaCost 1 Dynegy Kendall Energy, LLC 1401 County Line Road Minooka EDFLT EOC Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class YearBuilt ShelterCap Stories ReplaCost 1 KENDALL COUNTY EOC 1102 CORNELL LANE YORKVILLE EFEO 1991 1 $130 Fire Station Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class Stories YearBuilt ReplaCost 1 Little Rock Fox Fire Department 5 E North ST Plano EFFS 2 2 Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District 103 E Beaver ST Yorkville EFFS 2 1999 5000 3 Lisbon-Seward Fire Protection CO 2 115 N Canal ST Newark EFFS 1 1989 200 4 Oswego Fire Protection District#1 3511 Wooley Oswego EFFS 2 2009 12000 5 Oswego Fire Protection District#2 2200 Weisbrook DR Oswego EFFS 1 1998 3000 6 Newark Fire Protection District 101 E Main ST Newark EFFS 2 1980 1300 7 Little Rock Fox Fire Station #2 22 Harris Ave Millbrook EFFS 1 2006 1600 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 165 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Stories Yearbilt ReplaCost 8 Little Rock Fox Fire Station #3 300 Mitchell Dr Plano EFFS 1 2007 1600 9 Bristol Kendall Fire Station #2 2101 McHugh Rd Yorkville EFFS 1 2004 3500 10 Bristol kendall Fire Station #3 4400 Rosenwinkle St Yorkville EFFS 1 2007 3500 11 Lisbon-Seward Fire Station #2 6410 Chicago Rd Plattville EFFS 1 2000 200 12 Oswego Fire Station #3 2200 Galena Rd Oswego EFFS 1 2004 3000 13 Jolet Fire Station #10 1599 N John D Paige Dr Joliet EFFS 1 2005 3000 14 Little Rock Fox Fire Department 5 E North ST Plano EFFS 2 Hazardous Materials Report ID Name Address City Class EPA ID Chemical Name 1 CATERPILLAR INC. RTE. 31 BOX 348 AURORA HDFLT ILD005070651 MANGANESE COMPOUNDS 2 CATERPILLAR INC. RTE. 31 BOX 348 AURORA HDFLT ILD005070651 PROPYLENE 3 CATERPILLAR INC. RTE. 31 BOX 348 AURORA HDFLT ILD005070651 XYLENE (MIXED ISOMER 4 CATERPILLAR INC. RTE. 31 BOX 348 AURORA HDFLT ILD005070651 ZINC COMPOUNDS 5 CATERPILLAR INC. RTE. 31 BOX 348 AURORA HDFLT ILD005070651 ETHYLENE GLYCOL 6 CATERPILLAR INC. RTE. 31 BOX 348 AURORA HDFLT ILD005070651 CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS 7 CATERPILLAR INC. RTE. 31 BOX 348 AURORA HDFLT ILD005070651 NAPHTHALENE 8 CATERPILLAR INC. RTE. 31 BOX 348 AURORA HDFLT ILD005070651 TOLUENE 9 CATERPILLAR INC. RTE. 31 BOX 348 AURORA HDFLT ILD005070651 DIETHANOLAMINE 10 TRU VUE 9400 W. 55TH ST. MC COOK HDFLT 000311744ACI HYDROGEN FLUORIDE 11 AVTEC INDS. INC. 120 KENDALL POINT DR. OSWEGO HDFLT ILD984791020 MANGANESE 12 PLANO METAL RTE. 34 PLANO HDFLT ILD054133079 TRICHLOROETHYLENE SPECIALTIES 13 PLANO METAL RTE. 34 PLANO HDFLT ILD054133079 COPPER SPECIALTIES 14 PLANO METAL RTE. 34 PLANO HDFLT ILD054133079 NICKEL COMPOUNDS SPECIALTIES 15 REMLINE CO. RTE. 47 N. OF CANNONBALL YORKVILLE HDFLT ILD005112420 N-BUTYL ALCOHOL TRAIL 16 WAYNE CIRCUITS 106 E. BEAVER ST. YORKVILLE HDFLT ILD046578241 COPPER INC. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 166 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class EPA ID Chemical Name 17 AAA COOPER 170 KENDALL POINT DR OSWEGO HDFLT ILD06711425 DIESEL FUEL TRANSPORT 18 ANR PIPELINE 6650 SANDY BLUFF RD SANDWICH HDFLT ILD006958581 ETHYLENE GLYCOL COMPANY 19 AT&T 866 ROCK CREEK ROAD PLANO HDFLT ILD006980800 LEAD COMMUNICATION 20 CATERPILLAR 2001 BASELINE RD MONTGOMERY HDFLT LEAD BATTERIES LOGISTICS 21 ELBURN 2219 ROUTE 47 NEWARK HDFLT ILD025441759 ANHYDROUS AMMONIA COOPERATIVE 22 NEWARK GRAIN 203 N JOHNSON ST NEWARK HDFLT DIESEL FUEL 23 GRAINCO FS, INC 17854 WABENA ST MINOOKA HDFLT ILD05415336 LEXAR 24 GRAINCO FS, INC 202 W RT 71 NEWARK HDFLT ILD054153036 ANHYDROUS AMMONIA 25 GRAINCO FS, INC 8115 RT 47 YORKVILLE HDFLT ILD054153036 ANHYDROUS AMMONIA 26 HINTZSCHE 60 RT 52 MINOOKA HDFLT ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FERTILIZER, INC 27 BELL TELEPHONE 227 E WASHINGTON ST OSWEGO HDFLT ILD108024050 SULFURIC ACID 28 BELL TELEPHONE 16 E MAIN PLANO HDFLT ILD108024050 SULFURIC ACID 29 BELL TELEPHONE HYDRAULIC ST YORKVILLE HDFLT ILD108024050 SULFURIC ACID 30 MEADOWVALE, INC 109 BEAVER ST YORKVILLE HDFLT ILD002986842 ANHYDROUS AMMONIA 31 PLANO MOLDING 431 E SOUTH ST PLANO HDFLT ILD005113014 SULFURIC ACID COMPANY 32 PLANO MOLDING 500 DUVICK AVE SANDWICH HDFLT ILD005113014 SULFURIC ACID COMPANY 33 PROBUILD 204 WHEATON AVE YORKVILLE HDFLT ILD025916800 TREATED LUMBER COMPANY 34 UPS FREIGHT, INC 175 KENDALL POINT DR OSWEGO HDFLT ILD005995071 DIESEL FUEL 35 VCNA PRAIRIE 3939 NEEDHAM RD PLANO HDFLT CALCIUM CHLORIDE 36 VERIZON 142 KIRKLAND CIRCLE OSWEGO HDFLT SULFURIC ACID WIRELESS Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 167 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Medical Care Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class Function Beds Stories ReplaCost 1 Tillers Nursing and Rehab Center 4390 Illinois 71 Oswego MDFLT NursHome 109 1 2 Hillside Rehab and Care Center 1308 Game Farm Rd Yorkville MDFLT NursHome 79 1 Natural Gas Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class Function Stories Year Built ReplaCost 1 ANR PIPELINE COMPANY MILLHURST &SANDYBLUFF RD SANDWICH GDFLT 1209.9 Police Station Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class Stories SheltCap Year Built ReplaCost 1 Newark Village Police Dept 101 W Lions St Newark EFPS 1554 2 County Sheriff Dept 1102 Cornell Ln Yorkville EFPS 2 1991 16000 3 Oswego Police Dept 3525 Us Highway 34 Oswego EFPS 2 1992 12000 4 Yorkville Police Adm 804 Game Farm Rd Yorkville EFPS 1 2000 8000 5 Plano Police Dept 9 E North St Plano EFPS 2 1500 6 Montgomery Police Dept 1460 SE River Rd Montgomery EFPS 1554 7 Millington Police Dept 206 Walnut St Millington EFPS 1554 Potable Water Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class Function Stories Year Built ReplaCost CITIZENS UTIL CO-VALLEY W/S ROUTE 31 1/S 1 MRNA ANCHOR OSWEGO PDFLT 36963 WELL#3 TREATMENT 2 FACILITY 512 TOWNHOUSE RD NEWARK PDFLT 1 1973 1515 ILLINOIS AMERICAN WATER 3 PLANT NEW SANDY BLUFF RD PLANO PDFLT Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 168 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Function Stories Year Built ReplaCost ILLINOIS AMERICAN WATER 4 PLANT MARLIN DR OSWEGO PDFLT OSWEGO TOWER & PUMP 5 HOUSE 340 S MADISON OSWEGO PDFLT 2 2009 1300 OSWEGO TOWER & PUMP 6 HOUSE LENNOX DR OSWEGO PDFLT 2 2000 1300 OSWEGO TOWER & PUMP 7 HOUSE OGDEN FALLS BLVD OSWEGO PDFLT 2 1998 1500 OSWEGO TOWER & PUMP 8 HOUSE 700 COLE AVE OSWEGO PDFLT 2 2006 2500 OSWEGO TOWER& PUMP 9 HOUSE TUSCANY TRAIL OSWEGO PDFLT 2 2009 3000 10 MINOOKA WATER FACILITY 1100 WILDEY ROAD MINOOKA PDFLT 2004 5000 11 OLD MILL HOUSE 751 E MAIN ST PLANO PDFLT 3 1850 1100 12 WELL 7 401 KRISTEN ST PLANO PDFLT 1 2008 1650 13 WATER TOWER 1 720 E MAIN ST PLANO PDFLT 1965 1000 14 WATER TOWER 2 4501 CUMMINS ST PLANO PDFLT 2004 1000 26619 GRANDE PARK 15 WATER TOWER BLVD PLAINFIELD PDFLT 2003 1664 16 WATER TOWER 750 DUVICK LANE SANDWICH PDFLT 1993 571.3 MONTGOME 17 PUMPING STATION NO 2 2199 BASELINE RD RY PDFLT 1 2007 600 Rail Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class Function Daily Traffic Year Built ReplaCost 1 AMTRAK W MAIN & S CENTER STREETS PLANO RDFLT PASSENGER 2663 School Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class Students Stories Year Built ReplaCost CHURCHILL ELEM 1 SCHOOL 520 SECRETARIAT LN OSWEGO EFS1 703 2005 15759.6 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 169 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Students Stories Year Built ReplaCost LONG BEACH ELEM 2 SCHOOL 67 LONG BEACH RD MONTGOMERY EFS1 619 1967 17588.8 OLD POST ELEMENTARY 3 SCHOOL 100 OLD POST RD OSWEGO EFS1 430 1996 12455.8 BOULDER HILL ELEM 4 SCHOOL 163 BOULDER HILL PAS MONTGOMERY EFS1 593 1957 15570.6 THOMPSON JR HIGH 5 SCHOOL 440 BOULDER HILL PAS OSWEGO EFS1 898 1976 35020.6 FOX CHASE ELEMENTARY 6 SCHOOL 260 FOX CHASE DR N OSWEGO EFS1 708 2001 16363 CENTENNIAL ELEM 7 SCHOOL 800 S WEST ST PLANO EFS1 360 1964 7294.8 8 P H MILLER ELEM SCHOOL 904 N LEW ST PLANO EFS1 489 1964 8283.3 9 PLANO HIGH SCHOOL 704 W ABE ST PLANO EFS1 602 1976 38081.23 10 PLANO MIDDLE SCHOOL 804 S HALE ST PLANO EFS1 322 1959 10511.2 11 NEWARK ELEM SCHOOL 503 CHICAGO RD NEWARK EFS1 120 1952 2869 MILLBROOK JUNIOR HIGH 12 SCHOOL 8411 Fox River Dr MILLBROOK EFS1 141 1967 3918 NEWARK COMM HIGH 13 SCHOOL 413 CHICAGO RD NEWARK EFS1 194 1937 9750 PRAIRIE POINT ELEM 14 SCHOOL 3650 GROVE RD OSWEGO EFS1 563 2005 15759.6 15 OSWEGO HIGH SCHOOL 4250 RTE 71 OSWEGO EFS1 1870 1964 85617.6 TRAUGHBER JR HIGH 16 SCHOOL 570 COLCHESTER OSWEGO EFS1 897 2008 37432.4 OSWEGO EAST HIGH 17 SCHOOL 1525 HARVEY RD OSWEGO EFS1 2090 2005 92860 KENDALL CO 18 OPPORTUNITY SCHOOL 33 E STONEHILL RD OSWEGO EFS1 61 1049.524 YORKVILLE MIDDLE 920 PRAIRIE CROSSING 19 SCHOOL DR YORKVILLE EFS1 794 2009 35000 20 LISBON GRADE SCHOOL 127 S CANAL ST NEWARK EFS1 125 1954 3500 YORKVILLE GRADE 21 SCHOOL 201 W SOMONAUK ST YORKVILLE EFS1 223 1952 6200 YORKVILLE HIGH SCHOOL 22 ACADEMY 702 GAME FARM RD YORKVILLE EFS1 419 1959 18000 23 BRISTOL GRADE SCHOOL 23 HUNT ST BRISTOL EFS1 232 1950 7000 24 YORKVILLE HIGH SCHOOL 797 GAME FARM RD YORKVILLE EFS1 992 1998 32000 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 170 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Students Stories Year Built ReplaCost CIRCLE CENTER GRADE 25 SCHOOL 901 MILL ST YORKVILLE EFS1 543 1968 12000 YORKVILLE 26 INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL 103 SCHOOLHOUSE RD YORKVILLE EFS1 599 2004 12000 CROSS EV. LUTHERAN 27 SCHOOL 8535 RT 47 YORKVILLE EFS1 236 3480.388 ST MARY CATHOLIC 28 SCHOOL 817 CENTER AVE PLANO EFS1 207 1958 5000 PARKVIEW CHRISTIAN 29 ACADEMY 201 W CENTER ST YORKVILLE EFS1 120 1887 1327.267 ST LUKE LUTHERAN 30 SCHOOL 63 FERNWOOD RD MONTGOMERY EFS1 87 1069.187 CHARLES REED 31 ELEMENTARY SCH 2110 CLUBLANDS PKWY PLAINFIELD EFS1 788 13750 AUTUMN CREEK 2377 AUTUMN CREEK 32 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BLVD YORKVILLE EFS1 451 2009 14000 GRANDE RESERVE 33 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3142 GRANDE TRAIL YORKVILLE EFS1 504 2006 12000 BRISTOL BAY 34 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 427 BRISTOL BAY DR YORKVILLE EFS1 321 2008 14000 HUNT CLUB ELEMENTARY 35 SCHOOL 4001 HUNT CLUB DRIVE OSWEGO EFS1 484 2008 17313.8 LAKEWOOD CREEK 2301 LAKEWOOD CREEK 36 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DR MONTGOMERY EFS1 815 2004 18021.6 SOUTHBURY 37 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 820 PRESTON LANE OSWEGO EFS1 786 2008 17313.8 KARL PLANK JUNIOR HIGH 38 SCHOOL 510 SECRATARIAT LANE OSWEGO EFS1 880 2006 37432.4 GRANDE PARK 26933 GRANDE PARK 39 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BLVD PLAINFIELD EFS1 447 2007 14691.8 BROKAW EARLY 40 LEARNING CENTER 1000 5TH ST OSWEGO EFS1 542 2007 7895.2 41 EMILY G JOHNS SCHOOL 430 S MITCHELL DR PLANO EFS1 520 2007 10754.7 KENDALL CO SPEC ED 42 COOP 201 GARDEN ST YORKVILLE EFS1 PLAINFIELD SOUTH HIGH 43 SCHOOL 7800 CATON FARM RD PLAINFIELD EFS1 72000 AUX SABLE MIDDLE 2001 WILDSPRING 44 SCHOOL PARKWAY JOLIET EFS1 21000 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 171 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 ID Name Address City Class Students Stories Year Built ReplaCost THOMAS JEFFERSON 45 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1900 OXFORD WAY JOLIET EFS1 13750 Waste Water Facilities Report ID Name Address City Class Function Stories Year Built ReplaCost FOX METRO WATER 1 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 682 STATE RT. 31 OSWEGO WDFLT 500000 2 NEWARK SD STP P.O. BOX 534 NEWARK WDFLT 1982 6500 1001 SOUTH HALE 3 PLANO STP STREET PLANO WDFLT 1986 17250 YORKVILLE-BRISTOL SD 4 STP 304 RIVER STREET YORKVILLE WDFLT 1957 40000 AUX SABLE CREEK BASIN 5 WWTP 8300 BLACK RD JOLIET WDFLT 2006 26000 MINOOKA WASTEWATER 6 FACILITY 1490 HOLT RD MINOOKA WDFLT 2002 85 7 WALMART LIFT STATION 6800 W RT 34 PLANO WDFLT PUMPS 1996 90 8 KLATT ST LIFT STATION 4005 KLATT ST PLANO WDFLT PUMPS 2006 150 FOX METRO PUMP 9 STATION 3055 ORCHARD RD OSWEGO WDFLT PUMPS 1999 2500 10 FOX METRO LIFT STATION 165 HARRISON ST OSWEGO WDFLT PUMPS 1995 4000 11 FIFTH ST LIFT STATION 404 RT 30 MONTGOMERY WDFLT PUMPS 1998 150 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 172 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Appendix H: Map of Critical Facilities -See attached map. Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 173 of 174 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan February 14, 2011 Appendix H: USGS Stream Gauge Data: Top ten flood flows from the USGS Stream Gauge Data for Kendall County Station Yorkville, IL Fox, IL River Blackberry Creek Fox River Tributary No 2 Period of Record 1961 - 2008 1961 - 1980 Latitude 41040'18" 41036'28" Longitude 88 026'29" 88 028'43" Rank Year Discharge Year Discharge (cfs) (cfs) 1 1996 5,510 1978 320 2 2008 2,130 1975 304 3 1983 2,060 1970 242 4 1997 2,040 1965 218 5 1991 1,360 1972 192 6 1974 1,320 1974 147 7 1970 1,300 1980 125 8 1985 1,290 1966 96 9 2009 1,270 1976 64 10 1979 1,250 1971 57 Kendall County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 174 of 174 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� $ 06 Legal El CA#6 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ■ -_� City Administrator E] Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El� wn sw _© Community Development ❑ PW 2012-41 � Police F-1 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Game Farm Road/ Somonauk Improvements Meeting and Date: City Council —July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Land Acquisition Contract Consideration Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Co.f 1- Memorandum To: City Council EST. —_ 1836 From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator .h 1;1 Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. LE Date: July 2, 2012 Subject: Game Farm/ Somonauk Improvements—Land Acquisition Background The City in 2009 obtained quotes for land acquisition services for the above referenced project and ultimately entered into an agreement with Jay M. Heap and Associates, LTD on June 23, 2009 to perform appraisal and negotiator services for $85,000. All work associated with the original agreement was completed with the exception of the final settlements for the remaining parcels. The ending contract value was $75,000. Currently the City and IDOT have acquired 11 parcels out of the necessary 33 needed prior to construction (See attached summary). In order to keep the project on target for the planned November 2014 letting, it is recommended that the City continue with the land acquisition process. We have attached a proposed schedule for your information. The land acquisition is being funded with Federal (FHWA) and Local (MFT) funds (50150). Current Status Attached, please find a proposal in the amount of $75,000 from Jay M. Heap and Associates, LTD to complete the remaining works items related to the land acquisition, which include updating the appraisal reports to current state and federal regulations and negotiations. Since the original work was completed by Jay M. Heap and Associates, LTD and this is an extension of that work, it is in the City's best interest to continue with them on this project. The work associated with the proposal would be paid for out of Local MFT funds. There is a current MFT resolution for the project has been previously approved by the City Council that would cover this expense. A supplemental resolution will most likely need to be approved during the actual land acquisition process. The current cost estimates for the remaining work items as follows: Appraisals and Negotiations $75,000 (MFT) Land Acquisition $350,000 ($175,000 FHWA/$175,000 MFT) Construction Engineering $735,000 (Local) Construction $6,130,000 ($2,343,512 FHWA/$3,786,488 Local) Proposed Action At this time, we ask that the City Council consider approving the proposal so that the project can remain on schedule. If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know. Memorandum To: Krysti Barksdale-Noble From: Jay Heap &Aaron Heap Date: June 21, 2012 Re: Game Farm/Somonauk Street Krysti, The following items are to be considered when discussing the new proposal: 1) The original reports are over 2 years old and not acceptable for project use. 2) Current IDOT/County/Municipal fees for Non-Complex Appraisal Reports are in a range of $1,500 to $3,500. 3) That the previously completed reports are not compliant with new changes to State & Federal regulations. 4) That the "waiver" appraisals designed to hold down costs for small takes and/or temporary easements are no longer permitted to be completed or utilized according to State & Federal regulations. Best Regards, ay JAY M. HEAP & ASSOCIATES, LTD REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS & CONSULTANTS 310W. JEFFERSON ST., MORRIS, IL 60450 Phone: (815) 942-2320 - Fax: (815) 942-2642 June 20, 2012 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, II. 60560 Re: Appraisal Proposal for Game Farm Road/Somonauk Street Appraisal/Appraisal Review and Negotiation Services Dear Ms. Barksdale-Noble: Pursuant to our meeting on June 18, 2012, we have arrived at a fee proposal for preparing market value appraisals, appraisal reviews and negotiations of real estate for the above referenced project. The effective date of value will be the date of inspection, unless otherwise specified. We reserve the right to change the type of reports proposed if after contacting the owner, completing the necessary analysis or changes in engineering occurs that could impact on values for the part taken, temporary easements or permanent easements, if any. Any report type changes would require approval in format and any fee increases or decreases by both the United City of Yorkville and Jay M. Heap &Associates, Ltd. of Morris, Illinois. The estimated total cost of this project is ($75,000) Seventy Five Thousand Dollars as shown on the attached spreadsheet, subject to being supplied premise plats, preliminary title work and other items required to complete this assignment. Based upon the data received, we would be happy to discuss our proposal in greater detail, if necessary. The appraisals will be prepared in compliance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) as promulgated by the Appraisal Foundation, the Illinois Department of Transportation and in conformance with the Standards of Professional Practice and the Code of Ethics of the Appraisal Institute. It is our understanding that the United City of Yorkville will receive one original and one copy of each report and our office will not communicate any part of our analysis or findings to any other parties without first receiving written authorization from you as our client. Furthermore, by agreeing to the terms of this proposal, the United City of Yorkville acknowledges its obligation to pay all invoices within 30 days of receipt. Ms. Barksdale-Noble June 20, 2012 Page 2 The anticipated time frame for completion of this assignment would be determined at the time of engagement and receipt of all documents from the United City of Yorkville or its representatives but not later than November 30, 2013. It is also necessary to quote you our hourly rate should any part of this project involve any special meetings, depositions, pre-trial conferences, court appearances, etc. They are all billed at $ 250 per hour or fractional part thereof for the appraiser, reviewer and negotiator and include out of pocket expenses. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to you. If you accept the terms of this proposal, please indicate so by signing below and returning to our office. Sincerely, JAY HE &ASSOCIATES, LTD. Jay . Heap, resident -t L- tate Certified/General No.: IL 553.000212 Expires: 09-30-13 Terms Accepted by: Name Title Dated: _ CITY OF YORKVILLE GAMEFARM ROAD-SOMONAUK STREET ROW AND TEMPORARY EASEMENT FEES PARCEL# NAME TAKE TE PE A F R F N F Totals GF009 Howard A. &Joyce E.Johnson YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF010 Robert Loftus YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF011 Yorkville Community School District#115 YES NO NO N/A N/A N/A N/A GF012 Bonnie A. Hausler NO YES NO $1,000 $500 $1,000 $2,500 GF013 Edward & Brenda G. Minick NO YES NO $1,000 $500 $1,000 $2,500 GF014 Teresa R. Berard NO YES NO $1,000 $500 $1,000 $2,500 GF015 David B. &Joni L.Angle YES YES NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF017 Robert J. &Ann J. McNelis YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF018 Michael L. & Katherine A. Heiman YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF020 Bristol-Kendall Joint Cemetery Association YES YES NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF021 Diane J. Conover YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF022 Diane J. Conover YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF023 Delores C. Lies,Gail C. Fisher, Gary L. & Diane Conover YES YES NO $2,000 $1,000 $2,000 $5,000 GF024 Harvey A. & Margaret E. Knell YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF025 Harvey A. & Margaret E. Knell YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF026 Brian D. & Kimberly E. Morris YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF027 Herbert E. & Pamela A. Kleinwachter YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF029 Martha L.Witt NO YES NO $1,000 $500 $1,000 $2,500 GF030 Martha L.Witt NO YES NO $1,000 $500 $1,000 $2,500 GF031 Gary L. Kritzbert YES YES NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF032 Gary L. &Susan Kritzberg YES NO NO $1,500 $750 $1,500 $3,750 GF033 Elite Yorkville, LLC YES YES NO $2,000 $1,000 $2,000 $5,000 $30,000 $15,000 $30,000 $75,000 TAKE- LAND& IMPROVEMENTS ACQUIRED TE -TEMPORARY EASEMENT *All Temporary Easements will be for(6)years PE - PERMANENT EASEMENT A/F -APPRAISAL FEE R/F - REVIEW FEE N/F - NEGOTIATION FEE (06/12) Jay M. Heap Associates, LTD Game Farm/Somonauk-ROW&Easement Costs 7/2/12 Acquired Parcels Appraised Value Offered Value Amount Parcel Address Owner Type ROW Temp.Esmt.(3 yrs) Total Remarks ROW Temp Esmt(6 yrs) Offered Agreed price 1 108 E.Somonauk Hight TE $0 $2,200 $2,200 Acquired $0 $4,400 $4,400 $4,400 2 106 E.Somonauk Wheeler TE $0 $2,200 $2,200 Acquired $0 $4,400 $4,400 $4,400 3 104 E.Somonauk Aters,Hyde TE $0 $800 $800 Acquired $0 $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 4 102 E.Somonauk Buckner ROW $0 $0 $0 IDOT acquired 5 101 E.Somonauk Steinke ROW&TE $0 $0 $0 IDOT acquired 6 601 N.Bridge Reinboldt ROW $0 $0 $0 IDOT acquired 7 104 W.Somonauk WMSY Properties,LLC TE $0 $3,200 $3,200 Acquired $0 $6,400 $6,400 $6,400 8 106 W.Somonauk McCoy TE $0 $2,000 $2,000 Acquired $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 16 n/a Parkview Fdn. TE $0 $500 $500 Acquired $0 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 19 503 Game Farm Sullivan ROW $5,100 $0 $5,100 Acquired $5,100 $5,100 $5,100 28 1205 Game Farm Gallaino,Studer ROW $16,500 $0 $16,500 Acquired $16,500 $16,500 $16,500 Parcels to be Acquired Appraised Value Offered Value Amount Parcel Address Owner Type ROW Temp.Esmt.(3 yrs) Total Remarks ROW Temp Esmt(6 yrs) Offered Agreed price 9 105 W.Somonauk Wirth ROW $2,825 $0 $2,825 $2,825 $2,825 10 n/a Loftus ROW $4,665 $0 $4,665 Tower Lane $4,665 $4,665 11 n/a School Dist. ROW $0 $0 $0 Conveyance from school district $0 $0 12 203 W.Somonauk Hausler TE $0 $500 $500 $0 $1,000 $1,000 13 205 W.Somonauk Minick TE $0 $500 $500 $0 $1,000 $1,000 14 406 W.Somonauk Berard TE $0 $3,200 $3,200 $0 15 405 West Street Angle ROW&TE $7,000 $4,200 $11,200 $7,000 $7,000 17 403 W.Somonauk McNelis ROW $16,614 $0 $16,614 $16,614 $16,614 18 501 Game Farm Heiman ROW $3,100 $0 $3,100 $3,100 $3,100 20 n/a Cemetary ROW&TE $15,000 $300 $15,300 $15,000 $600 $15,600 21 n/a Conover ROW $10,700 $0 $10,700 Just north of high school $10,700 $10,700 22 997 Game Farm Conover ROW $16,400 $0 $16,400 $16,400 $16,400 23 n/a Lies,Fisher,Conover ROW&TE $3,300 $2,800 $6,100 Conover Lane $3,300 $3,300 24 1011 Game Farm Knell ROW $14,000 $0 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 25 n/a Knell ROW $4,600 $0 $4,600 Private Road $4,600 $4,600 26 1105 Game Farm Morris ROW $12,500 $0 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 27 1201 Game Farm Kleinwachter ROW $19,600 $0 $19,600 $19,600 $19,600 29 1204 Game Farm Witt TE $0 $4,200 $4,200 $0 30 1206 Game Farm Damato TE $0 $2,200 $2,200 $0 31 1211 Game Farm Kritzberg G ROW&TE $22,400 $300 $22,700 $22,400 $600 $23,000 32 1217 Game Farm Kritzberg S ROW $8,000 $0 $8,000 valued as commercial property $8,000 $8,000 33 1308 Game Farm Elite Yorkville LLC ROW&TE $45,400 $60,200 $105,600 Nursing Home $45,400 $45,400 Totals $227,704 $25,000 $252,704 $43,400 City Cost @ 50% $113,852 $12,500 $126,352 Total paid to date $43,400 PROJECT SCHEDULE Engineering Enterprises,Inc. GAME FARM ROAD/SOMONAUK STREET IMPROVEMENTS • United City of Yorkville, IL May 9, 2012 DRAFT Year: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Month: M J J A S O N D J F M A M I J J I A S I O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A I S O N D J I F I M I A M J J A S O N D WORK ITEM City FY: 1 A • • Land Acquisition Final Design IEPA Permit Submittal and Review Pre-Final Plan Submittal Final Plan Submittal Joint and Phase III Construction Agreement Submittal : I � • - . Project Letting Project Award and Contracting Construction GAPublifforkville\201 1\YO1 1 13-C Game Farm Somonauk Improvements\Eng\[Project Schedule-5-12.x1s]Project Schedule Legend Land Acquisition Bidding and Contracting IEPA Submittal and Review Construction LFinal Design Illinois Department Resolution for Improvement by I Municipality Under the Illinois of Transportation Highway Code BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the Council or President and Board of Trustees United City of Yorkville Illinois City,Town or Village that the following described street(s) be improved under the Illinois Highway Code: Name of Thoroughfare Route From To Game Farm Road US Route 34 Somonauk St. Somonauk Street Game Farm Road Colton St. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, 1. That the proposed improvement shall consist of preparing appraisals, appraisal reviews, and negotiator services for right-of-way and easement acquisition. and shall be constructed N/A wide and be designated as Section 03-00031-00-FP 2. That there is hereby appropriated the (additional ® Yes ❑ No) Sum of seventy-five thousand and 00/100-------------------------------------- Dollars ( $75,000.00 )for the improvement of said section from the municipality's allotment of Motor Fuel Tax funds. 3. That work shall be done by contract ; and, Specify Contract or Day Labor BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the district office of the Department of Transportation. Approved I, Beth Warren Clerk in and for the United City of Yorkville City,Town or Village County of Kendall hereby certify the Date foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the City Council Council or President and Board of Trustees Department of Transportation at a meeting on July 24, 2012 Date IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this day of Regional Engineer (SEAL) City,Town,or Village Clerk Printed 7/16/2012 BLR 09111 (Rev. 11/06) CIP Reviewed By: *:1 a► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ CA#7 EST. � -_ 1836 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 ��. % Human Resources El Tracking Number ,*�w © Community Development ❑ CC 2012-48 ALE �V� Police ❑ Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Home Rule Referendum Resolution Meeting and Date: City Council —July 24, 2012 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N /A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: `,SAD C►p 011% Memorandum To: City Council EST 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: .y� p Date: July 4, 2012 QW* Subject: Home Rule referendum resolution LLE '► Summary A resolution authorizing a binding referendum question on home rule authority for the November 2012 general election. Background This item was last discussed by the City Council at the June 26th City Council meeting. At that meeting, the City Council expressed the merits and detriments of home rule authority and a referendum question for home rule authority. No official City Council opinion was registered on either matter, although a majority of City Council members expressed acceptance of the resolution to authorize the referendum question. If the City Council wishes to authorize a referendum question on home rule authority for the November general election, the attached resolution may be approved. Any resolution authorizing a referendum question for the November general election must be approved by the City Council before mid-August, leaving the July 24th City Council meeting as the final regularly scheduled meeting prior to the deadline. If the attached resolution is approved, the staff would work to schedule at least three public meeting information sessions on home rule and non-home rule authority. We would suggest that the meetings could be held in the months of August, September and October,prior to the November 6th election. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the resolution authorizing a binding referendum question on home rule authority for the November 2012 general election. Resolution No. 2012- A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE ELECTORS OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, A REFERENDUM OF WHETHER THE CITY SHOULD BECOME A HOME RULE MUNICIPALITY WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, Section 6(a) of the 1970 Constitution of the State of Illinois provides that municipalities may elect by referendum to become home rule units; and, WHEREAS, Section 28-7 of the Election Code (10 ILCS 5/28-7)provides a method of submission of referendum which are authorized by Article VII of the Constitution and that such referendum may be initiated by the City Council by passage of a resolution requesting the submission of the referendum for consideration by the voters of the City; and, WHEREAS,the City Council hereby finds that it is in the best interest of the City to submit the referendum of whether the City shall become a home rule municipality to the electors pursuant to the Election Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The City Council finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and includes the recitals in this Resolution. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that it is in the best interests of the City to provide for a referendum concerning the adoption of home rule. Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to immediately certify and submit the following public question to the Kendall County Clerk to be placed on the ballot for the general election to be held on November 6, 2012, in the following form: Shall the United City of Yorkville become a home rule unit of government Yes pursuant to Article VII, Section 6(a) of the Constitution of the State of Illinois? No Section 4. This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. 1 Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2012. MAYOR 2 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� 6 Legal ❑ Minutes #1 EST. 1&36 Finance El Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator El r� �! �© Consultant El CC 2012-52 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the City Council—June 26, 2012 Meeting and Date: City Council 7/24/12 Synopsis: Approval of minutes. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: City Clerk Warren Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY,JUNE 26,2012 Mayor Golinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Warren called the roll. Ward I Gilson Present Colosimo Present Ward II Milschewski Present Kot Present Ward III Munns Present Funkhouser Present Ward IV Spears Present Teeling Present Also present: City Clerk Warren, City Attorney Orr, City Administrator Olson,Deputy Chief of Police Hilt,Public Works Director Dhuse,Finance Director Fredrickson,EEI Engineer Sanderson, Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble,Director of Park and Recreation Schraw QUORUM A quorum was established. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Alderman Spears requested that Item#3 (EDC 2012-19)A and B on the consent agenda be moved to the regular agenda under the Economic Development Committee. Alderman Spears also asked that the public hearing be moved back under presentations. Alderman Gilson requested that Item#4(PC 2012-01)on the consent agenda be moved to the regular agenda under Plan Commission. Item#6 (PS 2012-12) on the consent agenda be moved to the regular agenda under Public Safety, and consent agenda items#7 (PW 2012-35), and# 8 (PW 2012-31)be moved to the regular agenda under Public Works. Amendment approved unanimously by a viva voce vote. PRESENTATIONS Certificates of Recognition Presented to the Yorkville Middle School 8'h Grade Girls Track 4x400 Meter Relay Team-Sydney Beach, Alexis Bermudez, Gianna Salzbrunn,Becca Jasutis&Julia Schultz Mayor Golinski presented a certificate of recognition to the Yorkville Middle School 8th grade girls track 4x400 meter relay team. Life Saving Award Presented to Alexandria Betzwiser Mayor Golinski presented a life saving award to Alexandria Betzwiser. Certificate of Appreciation Presented to Joe Moore Mayor Golinski presented a certificate of appreciation to Joe Moore. PUBLIC HEARINGS REC Center Purchase Mayor Golinski stated this public hearing will occur for the next three months, so everyone that wants to speak has an opportunity to do so. The Council will not vote on this until the end of September. Nancy McCree, State Street, spoke on the benefits of the Rec Center and how it is invaluable to Yorkville. The Rec Center is a much needed community facility. It should be purchase by the City. Bob Mayes,resident since 1962, spoke on the Rec Center. He stated about 3,000 people utilize this facility. He feels the Rec Center is more beneficial than bike paths. He hopes the City can come to a financial agreement with the Walkers. Patrick Speciale, State Street,was a victim of a car accident. The Rec Center has been a vital part of his recovery. A wide range of people utilize the Rec Center. He does not want the Rec Center eliminated. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—June 26, 2012—Page 2 of 11 Larry Debord, Somonauk Street, doesn't know how the City got involved with the Rec Center. He believes everyone that wants the Rec Center should pay for it themselves. The City should walk away. Walt Stagner,Wildwood 2, agrees with the Mr. Debord's comments. Government never runs anything correctly. He believes it is absurd for Yorkville to take on this debt. He is against having to pay this. Lisa Peterson,Adrian Street,believes it was a poor decision to lease the Rec Center. She attended the last two ADHOC Rec Center committee meetings and sat in on discussions about the YMCA. The YMCA has a long term plan to build a new facility in or near Yorkville. The timeline and phases of the YMCA was discussed. If the YMCA is built, she believes in about five years the City will be stuck with another 15 years of a 4.35 million dollar mortgage. This is due to the fact that the Rec Center will be an obsolete facility. It concerns her that the City is facing a debt of 1.8 million for the Countryside TIF in 2018. The City has no comprehensive plan of how to pay for this. The City also had to write off bad debts due to the developer fees that were uncollectable. The City is planning on adding an additional$8.25 onto the taxpayer's water and sewer bill. This is because the City does not have a plan to pay for the shortfall it is facing next year. She discussed repairs the City needs to make. The City does not have the money to purchase the Rec Center and is under no obligation to do so. Only 8%of Yorkville's population utilizes the Rec Center. The Rec Center purchase should go on the November ballot, so taxpayer's can decide if they want this 4.35 million dollar debt for the next 20 years. She urges residents of Yorkville to let the City Council know how they feel about this decision. She thinks of school buildings as public buildings, since her state and City tax dollars go to support the school district. She believes that any organization should be able to have access to these buildings for a minimal charge. She would like to know what the school district is charging the City to use their building. She was disturbed to find out the City has not gone to a financial institution for this loan. This would be financed through the Walker family. If the City wants to purchase the Rec Center it needs to go to a financial institution to get a real loan. She went over the budget for the Rec Center. Cities are here to provide essential services. The City functioned fine before this facility and will continue to function fine without this facility. Joe Frieders,Twin Leaf Trail,feels the Rec Center is a dump and the City should walk away from it. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mark A. Johnson, Georgeanna Street, criticized the Council for trying to cover so many important agenda items in one meeting and questioned the motive for doing so. He discussed the costs associated with changes to any employee manual and is shocked to hear that the City has failed to fund employee pensions over the past 30 years.Addressing agenda item two,Mr. Johnson noted the possibility that the OSLAD Grant program is in serious jeopardy by the states own admission. He warns against funding projects if state funds are uncertain. He questioned the logic of developing a park on top of a sludge disposal site considering the potential health risks. Mr. Johnson's main concern with the complex agenda items is that he feels there is not the necessary amount of time put into researching the total impact of these projects. He is aware that the City staff has done research and made recommendations in the past that have had very negative impact to the City. Mr.Johnson is concerned that the PUD amendments could lead to more developer handouts the City cannot afford. He questions the logic behind increasing the amount of hours alcohol can be served in the City limits and allowing for video gaming. He stated that the repair to streets in the City should be prioritized equally and questions the need to repair Kennedy Road before other roads. Mr. Johnson admits to have no knowledge on the LOC bond call policy but states Yorkville's track history has been subpar. He expressed concerns over hiring practices for part time police officers and agrees the City should be in compliance with the Illinois prevailing wage act. Regarding the changes to the musical entertainment ordinance,he questions if this isn't part of a plan that changes the overall character of the City. Mr. Johnson is concerned that adopting the Home Rule will be most damaging to taxpayers and most advantageous to politicians. Home Rule should not be considered until the City has reached the necessary population of 25,000. Mr. Johnson addressed the issue of changing City Council procedures and potential problems associated with doing so. In regards to the Route 34 letter of understanding he hopes its intent is to limit the financial burden of such projects by not saddling future Councils with the same type of obligations the City has today. Mr.Johnson addressed the issue of the sale of City property and feels that any sale of public property be closely scrutinized. Mr. Johnson believes the Council should in no way limit the time for individuals to speak during the citizen comment section. Jason Leslie,former Alderman, discussed the RFP and thanked the Council for the revisit of it. He is asking for the opportunity for the potential sale of a property owned by the City of Yorkville. He gave information on his background. He is a hard worker and holds integrity above all things. He loves Yorkville and wants to buy the old post office property downtown. He knows what he wants to bid for it and is happy telling anyone what that number is. He is offering the potential for an in kind exchange. He thinks he can bring a 150%of comparative return by the development of the waterfront as an in kind exchange.He is here to build what he hopes to be a multimillion dollar company on the riverfront. He will share his vision and the Council can vote accordingly. He hopes he has at least four votes to carry the potential of negotiations to be heard. The Council doesn't have to say yes,he just wants to opportunity to The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—June 26, 2012—Page 3 of 11 present what he wants to do. He can't guarantee that he will succeed but he will put his money on the line to risk it.He asks that the Council please let him know tonight what his destiny is tonight. Lynn Dubajic,YEDC,reported on Push for the Path. As of today,Push for the Path has collected $81,804.71. Eighty-five power of one teams have been formed. Money is coming in at about$5,000 a day. She is hopeful that Push for the Path will exceed their$100,000 goal on July 05, 2012. The annual golf outing will be taking place on August 11,2012 at Blackberry Oaks Golf Course. Push for the Path hopes to raise $30,000. Push for the Path has the potential of raising about$150,000 this year. That would take Push for the Path well into the 5th year. Currently they have enough funds to pay the City of Yorkville for the first four year commitment. Rachel Engelhardt,Blackberry Lane, spoke on how Push for the Path is bringing a$1.7 million asset to our community at zero taxpayers dollars. After four months the City has 85 teams that have pledged $1,000 each and have already collected over$80,000. She is confident there are still hundreds of people in this community that want to donate to Push for the Path. She cannot wait to see what the next 10 days brings. She believes this bike path will increase the safety,health,and enjoyment of all who live,work, and play in Yorkville.The big Push for the Path fundraiser has not occurred yet,which is the golf outing sponsored by the McCue family. There is already enough money collected to cover the City's first four years of payments. The biggest payment comes in the fifth year but that gives Push for the Path the next five years to bring in significant funds.After July 05,2012,Push for the Path will be focusing on a few bigger events that can raise significant funds. She is here to celebrate the $80,000 that has been raised. She discussed the power of one and what one person can do for the community. She is proud to be part of this community and this initiative. Stella Krauss,Kate Drive,believes Mr. Leslie is an amazing beer maker and has an opportunity to bring an amazing venture to Yorkville's downtown. There is a new energy downtown and it is short sided not to help businesses that want to bring a better future to Yorkville. Businesses have to come to Yorkville's downtown so jobs can be created. She believes that Three Angles is a very worthy endeavor. She discussed the issue and benefits of the liquor license being extended. Tom Gilmour,Fox Glen Drive, spoke from the perspective of an Illinois tax payer.He stated Illinois can't fund its pension system along with other obligations but can come up with grant money anytime somebody in local government wants it. His advice is to go back to the basics. He discussed the sale of the old post office. He asked the Council to use common sense when making decisions. Rick Tollefson,Boombah,responded to insinuations that his interest in Yorkville's downtown is for anything but the betterment of the City. He has invested in several businesses in the downtown area and would like to see Yorkville's downtown area thrive. Eduardo Cajina,John Street, came to attest to Mr. Leslie's experience and success as a businessman and hopes the Council will consider his application. Alderman Gilson read Jesus Alaniz, Colonial Drive, citizen comments. (See attached.) Lisa Peterson,Adrian Street,began by rereading her e-mail she had sent to Alderman Gilson. She is concerned that the development plans for the City offer incentives to the builders but leaves the additional costs burden on the current residents. She points out that the City portion of her property taxes have doubled over the past two years. Whereas her taxes have increased nearly 70%over the past 10 years, she sees no addition to City services. She does not feel it is the taxpayer's responsibility to fund housing development in the City and hopes this project is never repeated. She addressed several agenda items including the additional fees to the existing water bill to fund the debt associated to the Rob Roy waterway project. She then discussed City decisions regarding the street maintenance program. The City has a contract for$100,000 to have a road study completed and yet has decided to make $50,000 worth of improvements to a road that is in much better condition than the roads in her neighborhood. She questions the Council's decision to proceed with any such projects before receiving the results of the road study. The third item she addresses is her concern that the City is considering purchasing the Evergreen Farms parcel. She believes the City should get back to the basics. She feels that the developers should pay for the costs of building in Yorkville and would like the Council to focus more on reducing the taxes to the residents. In concerns to the Mayor's report she does not support the adoption of Home Rule. She does not like the power it affords the City and the removal of the residents will. Finally, she does not support the Council's attempt to limit the amount of time residents are allowed to address the Council concerning important City issues. Mario Serra, East Main Street,moved to Yorkville a year ago. He feels he should trust the Council. He told the Council to do whatever they need to do to move the City forward. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—June 26, 2012—Page 4 of 11 CONSENT AGENDA 1. Bills for Payment-$1,997,215.27 (CC 2012-46) 2. Resolution 2012-13 Approving a Revised Employee Manual—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute (ADM 2011-40) 3. Ordinance 2012-13 Amending the Code of Ordinances Providing for Liquor Control regarding Hours of Sale—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute(PS 2012-11) 4. Ordinance 2012-14 Amending the Code of Ordinances Adopting Hiring Standards for Part-Time Police Officers—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute (PS 2012-13) 5. Ordinance 2012-15 Declaring the United City of Yorkville's Compliance with Illinois Prevailing Wage Act—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute (ADM 2012-36) 6. Ordinance 2012-16 Amending the Code of Ordinances Regarding Musical Entertainments— authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute(ADM 2012-37) 7. Monthly Treasurer's Report for May 2012 (ADM 2012-38) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the consent agenda as amended. So moved by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Spears. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye,Milschewski-aye, Spears-aye,Munns-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Gilson-aye, Teeling-aye,Kot-aye MINUTES FOR APPROVAL 1. Minutes of the City Council—April 24,2012 (CC 2012-44) 2. Minutes of the City Council—May 22, 2012 (CC 2012-47) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the minutes of the regular City Council meeting for April 24,2012 and May 22,2012 as presented. So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Alderman Gilson had two changes on the April 24,2012 meeting. Alderman Milschewski had one correction on May 22, 2012 minutes. A motion was made by Mayor Golinski to approve the minutes as corrected. Minutes approved unanimously by a viva voce vote. REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT Home Rule Discussion (CC 2012-48) Mayor Golinski stated the staff is seeking direction on whether or not they should draft an ordinance for Home Rule to be put on the November general election. This is not about taxation. It is about greater local authority. Mayor Golinski stated the Council will pass an ordinance restricting the Council to a property tax cap. Alderman Gilson doesn't think the people of Yorkville understand home rule verses non-rule enough to vote on the issue. Mayor Golinski stated the plan is to have a series of town hall type meetings, at least three,between now and November. Alderman Gilson believes this is another way to give authority to the City to enact more taxes and government.He will be voting against this. Alderman Colosimo feels that citizens of Yorkville should get the chance to decide with their vote.Alderman Kot is in favor of putting this on the ballot and believes that the residents should have the right to decide. Alderman Munns is in favor of putting this on the ballot for there are benefits to having Home Rule. Alderman Spears has a different view of putting Home Rule on the ballot. She believes whether it is put to a vote or not,it could somehow come to pass. City Attorney Orr stated the referendum would be binding no matter which way the vote goes. Alderman Teeling believes Home Rule should be put on the ballot so the residents can decide. Alderman Funkhouser is fine with putting this up for the residents to vote. The residents need to be educated on Home Rule. He discussed the possible tax cap.There are some positive aspects to Home Rule.Alderman Colosimo verified that the City is limited to three referendums on the ballot. He just wanted to make sure that there are no pending issues that might be considered more important for the November ballot. Mayor Golinski was not aware of any other issues other than wanting to put the treasurer and City Clerks position on the referendum. Mayor Golinski stated it sounds like the majority is in favor of moving forward with it, so the City will see an ordinance or resolution next City Council meeting. Ordinance Regarding City Council Procedures (CC 2012-49) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance regarding City Council procedures and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—June 26, 2012—Page 5 of 11 Mayor Golinski stated several Aldermen came to him asking about City Council procedures. He asked City Attorney Orr to come up with ideas on streamlining the meetings. She came up with an idea of a five minute time limit at the beginning of the meeting for items on the agenda and five minutes at the end of the meeting for topics not on the agenda. Alderman Spears would never support this. She believes it is very important to hear citizen comments and doesn't care if they talk for 20 minutes. She doesn't think this ordinance should be put in place. Alderman Gilson will be voting against this.He believes this is an attack on freedom of speech and an attack on the public's involvement in government. Residents should be able to say whatever they want about government and the City of Yorkville's leadership. There should be no time limit on citizen comments. Alderman Colosimo likes the part of breaking up comments to one at the beginning and one at the end. In the beginning citizens can talk about City business and at the end they can talk about whatever they want. He has always been against limiting the time of citizen comments. He will be voting against the ordinance as written,however if the ordinance is redrafted allowing for citizen comments at the beginning for agenda items and at the end for all other items,he would support that with no time limits. He might consider having some sort of procedural ordinance so if a citizen becomes disrespectful in any way,they can be cut off. He will be voting no. Alderman Milschewski and Alderman Munns agree with Alderman Colosimo. Alderman Colosimo stated procedurally there is an out if a citizen decides to stand up and read the phone book for the second half of citizen comments. There is no business left, so each alderman could decide to get up and walk out. Once there is no longer a quorum then the meeting is over. Alderman Milschewski made a motion to table this ordinance to the next City Council meeting; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-5 Nays-3 Kot-aye,Munns-aye, Spears-nay, Colosimo-nay, Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-nay PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT Resolution 2012-14 Route 34 Letter of Understanding (PW 2012-33) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve a resolution of intent regarding Route 34 shared-use trail and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Colosimo. Alderman Gilson asked with the City's $87,400 for the trails, can the City provide for it in the budget. City Administrator Olson stated no. One of these letters of understanding was approved in 2010 and the second one that was approved would have been after the budget session. The City hasn't had a budget cycle come up where the City has had this commitment and where IDOT has said the City will definitely be doing the project in the next five years. That would be the City's trigger to add it to the budget. Alderman Gilson asked how the City will come up with the funds and when would they be repaid? City Administrator Olson stated that the City will pull it out of the City wide capital fund. The timing of the expense depends on IDOT's online budget process. They have this through 2016. This would fall during the City's fiscal year 15 or 16 depending on when it fell during the calendar year.Alderman Gilson asked if the City wide capital fund is the same money that the City uses for its streets and infrastructure. City Administrator Olson stated that is for general City projects. Alderman Gilson stated if the City can't pay for its roads now,why go forward with this. City Administrator Olson stated this is actually two different letters of understanding that the City has already committed to. This letter of understanding that is being voted on folds it into one. The new terms of the one letter of understanding is actually more beneficial to the City than they were as two separate letters. The argument is that this becomes a better deal for the City. Alderman Gilson has opposed many letters of understanding in the past. When these projects come due, if the City doesn't have money then the City is committing to projects it can't fund. He finds it ironic that the City is looking at committing to this letter of understanding but the state can't pay their bills. Looking at this from a funding perspective,the City doesn't have money. He is not going to vote for something in 2015 and 2016 that is going to stick it to the tax payer when he doesn't know if the City is going to have the funds to do it. He will be voting against it. Alderman Kot wanted to clarify that this Council and the previous Council entered into the letter of understanding with the state. If the state hadn't approached the City with this new letter of understanding,the City was expecting to spend up to $150,000 on this project. By accepting this new letter of understanding the City is going to save $60,000 or more. He thinks this is a cost effective way to do this and is going to support it. Alderman Colosimo would agree with Alderman Gilson 100%if this was a new letter of understanding or a new project. The Council of the United City of Yorkville has committed the City to this project at a 50150 split with the State. If the Council approves this new letter of understanding it is the same project and it is an 80/20 split with the State. The City is already committed. The fiscally responsible thing to do is to approve the new letter of credit. That way the City is committed to 20%and not 50%. He will be voting in support of this. Alderman Funkhouser stated the City is committed to$150,000 right now. If the City does not accept this,then the City is paying$150,000. Our worst case is a reduced amount of engineering fees to back out. That is if we get to that point and the City can't find the funding. It is irresponsible to say no and accept$150,000 as compared to $87,000. Reduce the burden and do what the City can to plan for it and if The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—June 26, 2012—Page 6 of 11 the City has to back out then they back out. Alderman Munns stated he agrees with Alderman Funkhouser. If Illinois can get some good leadership down in Springfield the state should have some money hopefully in four years. The City is committed to this so he will be voting yes. Alderman Gilson the City is renewing its commitment to pay a bill it can't afford. That is not fiscally responsible. What happens if the City doesn't approve this letter of understanding and tells the State that Yorkville can't pay for the old letter of understanding? City Administrator Olson is sure the State would pursue every legal opportunity they had to come after Yorkville.As a larger form of government they are going to get their way one way or another. Alderman Spears was going to oppose this but now realizing that the City is committed and it would be a cost savings, she will support it. She does request that the Council stop spending on trails,paths, and various things like that. This gets the City in trouble and cost the taxpayers quite a bit of money. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-1 Munns-aye Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-nay,Kot-aye Resolution 2012-15 MFT for 2012 Street Maintenance Program (PW 2012-35) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an MFT resolution for 2012 street maintenance program and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Spears. Public Works Director Dhuse stated this road was selected for the fact that it is a highly traveled and high speed road. The City was trying to stay within one area to get the best price for the City's $50,000. The City is trying to save a road that is in relatively decent shape. He understands there are other streets in town that are exactly the same way but this is what was decided on. Alderman Colosimo stated he doesn't need a road study done to tell him that the roads in Ward I are the worst roads in the City. As Alderman of Ward I and until he sees the road study,he can't put money into any other road except for Ward 1. Alderman Milschewski asked if this money has to be spent now or can the City wait till the road study is done. City Administrator Olson stated the road study will not be presented until December. The Council can always wait and do something after the fact,but given the road condition,it is the staff's recommendation to fix it now. Alderman Milschewski asked if the City doesn't use the $50,000 does the City lose it. Public Works Director Dhuse stated the City doesn't lose it. Alderman Spears asked if the City can use the MFT funds to repaint arrows on streets. Countryside Parkway is very dangerous for the arrows are completely gone. Public Works Director Dhuse said the City can look into that. City Administrator Olson stated there are other line items that can cover that expense.Alderman Spears asked for that to be rushed. Alderman Munns stated there are some roads in Ward III that are in disrepair and he and Alderman Funkhouser know they need repairing. He would like to get the road study to see which ones make more sense to fix. If a road is fixed before it deteriorates it will save the City a lot of money in the long run. He will wait to see what the experts say about Ward III roads. City Administrator Olson stated there is money set aside that is not MFT related, so it is easier for the City to spend it for road maintenance. Alderman Funkhouser wants to see the road study to know how to proceed. Should the City do nothing this year and wait for the road study or should it be put to the roads that are already reserved? Immediate action would say that the City needs to do something. Each alderman has their own interests of what they would like fixed. He is going to defer this to staff and support doing this with the funds that the City has. This will preserve a road that is in relatively good condition but does have some potential for deterioration and other issues. City Administrator Olson stated that the City has identified this road and that particular curb is a potential issue.His statement was,yes,the City could wait till after the winter season but that will make the road worse. It is the staff s recommendation that this is fixed during this construction season. Alderman Gilson believes there are much worse roads in Yorkville than this road and he believes the money should be spent elsewhere. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-5 Nays-3 Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-nay, Kot-aye,Munns-aye, Spears-nay, Colosimo-nay LOCBond Call Policy (PW 2012-31) Mayor Golinski stated a motion is not needed for this topic. This is informational. City Administrator Olson stated that the City is proposing to take this to a public hearing so it is up to the Mayor if they do this by motion or not.Mayor Golinski stated all that is needed is direction. Alderman Colosimo stated the Council is streamlining the process to make it crystal clear to the developers exactly what the City's trigger mechanisms for these bonds will be. It takes the decisions out of the politician's hands and it treats everybody fairly.He whole heartedly supports this. Mayor Golinski stated if the City had,had this policy in place 4 or 5 years ago,the City wouldn't be in the mess it is in. Alderman Gilson has been pushing for this for a long time. There are a couple things that he sees as issues. The City's bond liabilities are slightly above $32,551,197.00. That doesn't equate to dollars until The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—June 26, 2012—Page 7 of 11 the City has to install or contract out to get the infrastructure in place. The scary part is the City has nowhere near the dollars in securities for these items. He doesn't think the City should be extending the time allowed for calling these bonds. He believes there are a lot of good things in this. He opposes extending the time allowed to three or four years. He is torn.He thinks he needs to vote for this but the City's liabilities are huge.All the Council is doing is extending it out even further and exposing the City to even more potential damage. Alderman Colosimo thinks this would apply to future developments. The reason the Council decided the three to four year window is that they hope development will never be as fast as it used to be in Yorkville. The Council thinks it should be fair to the new developers in the future. The Council thinks a three or four year window is a reasonable time to develop a subdivision in Yorkville. Alderman Gilson agrees but would like the Council to consider two years. He believes that is a fair time limit. Alderman Kot thinks three or four years is reasonable. He is going to vote for it. Mayor Golinski asked for roll call to see if there was consensus from the City Council to give staff direction to initiate the application for notice and hearing of amendments to the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance. Majority of City Council was in favor of moving forward. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Present-1 Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-present,Kot-aye,Munns-aye ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT Resolution 2012-16 OSLAD Grant Applications (EDC 2012-19) Riverfront Park Development Grant Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve a doc 3 resolution of authorization to apply for an OSLAD grant for the development of Bicentennial Riverfront Park and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Alderman Spears doesn't think the City is a position to apply for any type of a grant. She believes it is going to cost the City money.As much as she would like the riverfront to look beautiful, she can't support this.Alderman Gilson agrees with everything Alderman Spears said. hi addition,he doesn't trust the City is going to get the money for the OSLAD part. He is concerned about these types of grants. He is not going to support this. Alderman Kot asked if there is a budget item that is going to be created if the City gets this grant. City Administrator Olson stated yes. If a City gets an OSLAD grant then the City puts out the money. The City then seeks reimbursement from the State. Alderman Kot stated since the State doesn't have any money he doesn't see the State entering into this agreement. Alderman Milschewski addressed her concerns on the OSLAD grant application. Alderman Colosimo doesn't believe new development is going to bring this City back. He believes private industry is going to bring this City back. He will support the riverfront property being developed. The State hasn't defaulted on these types of grants. He will be voting yes for the riverfront.Alderman Funkhouser is in favor of doing this for the riverfront.Alderman Gilson stated by the City taking this grant,he questions if this increases the States financial burden.Alderman Colosimo countered Alderman Gilson by stating it is his job to represent the City and see to it that Yorkville gets as much funding from the State as possible. It is up to the state legislature to work within its own budget. The Council would be doing the City a disservice by allowing funds to go to other municipalities from the tax dollars our residence have paid to the State. Alderman Gilson believes the Council is only contributing to a bigger problem and perpetuates a system that spends more money than they have. Alderman Kot agrees with Alderman Colosimo and believes he owes it to the residents to get as much funding for the City as possible. Alderman Funkhouser said the City needs to work within the system that is now in place. The long term goal is to lobby Springfield to change its spending practices,but for now the City needs to obtain whatever State funding is available. Alderman Milschewski agrees with Alderman Gilson in theory but she supports obtaining OSLAD funding. Alderman Gilson doesn't trust the State and worries the City could be liable for unpaid funding. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-1 Kot-aye,Munns-aye, Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-nay Evergreen Farms Land Acquisition Grant Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve a doc-3 resolution of authorization to apply for an OLSAD grant for the acquisition of the Evergreen Farms and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Colosimo. Alderman Spears opposes the proposed acquisition due to potential health risks.Alderman Funkhouser does not believe this site is suited for the proposed application.Alderman Gilson defined the term bio solids also known as sludge and provided facts pertaining to potential health risks.He opposes this measure. Alderman Kot asked Director of Park and Recreation Schraw her input.Director of Park and Recreation Schraw stated information provided to the City was that the sludge did not present a health The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—June 26, 2012—Page 8 of 11 hazard. Alderman Colosimo stated the Council does not have the authority to regulate sludge. He will be voting no. Alderman Teeling would have prefered the fill from the Route 47 construction project. Motion failed by a roll call vote. Ayes-0 Nays-8 Munns-nay Spears-nay, Colosimo-nay,Funkhouser-nay, Milschewski-nay, Teeling-nay, Gilson-nay,Kot-nay PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT Ordinance 2012-17 Amending the Regulations for Amusement Devices and Including Video Gaming Terminals (PS 2012-12) Mayor Golinski entertained an ordinance amending the regulations for amusement devices and including video gaming terminals and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Teeling. Alderman Munns has experience with this for he worked for the Illinois state lottery for nine years. The lottery tried to put these gambling machines in back then and the State voted this down. Virtually every store that had lottery ticket sales had poker machines in the back. The stores were paying out under the table. If the State is going to regulate it to make sure there is no illegal gambling going on that is a good thing. The City would make a little money. Again,this goes along with our freedoms in this country. If the State wants to put money in a poker machine, it is up to each individual if they want to put it in or not. He has no problem keeping Yorkville's bars and restaurants competitive. He doesn't think it is going to drive people to do things they weren't going to do anyway. Alderman Spears was not sure if she was going to support this. She then stated if this can help the businesses for a short time and is regulated, she thinks she will support it. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-2 Spears-aye, Colosimo-nay,Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-nay,Kot-aye,Munns-aye ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT Ordinance 2012-18 Providing for an Extension of the Water Infrastructure Improvement and Maintenance Fee (ADM 2012-29) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance amending the code of ordinances providing for an extension of the water infrastructure improvement and maintenance fee and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Mayor Golinski stated this is not new but an extension of what is already there. Alderman Colosimo stated in committee it was suggested that the City does not put a sunset clause on it. The Council did put a sunset clause on it for one year. This is due to the fact that this is a tax that the Council doesn't like voting for. It would be very easy to sweep it under the carpet and pretend it never happened. He thinks that the pain of having to vote for this every year is a yearly reminder that the residents are still paying an$8.25 that they shouldn't be paying. Unfortunately, if the City doesn't pass it then the City has almost a million dollar deficit in the City's water fund. The resident's bill would remain the same level it is today. If it wasn't passed it would lower the resident's bills by$8.25. He will be voting a reluctant,yes. Mayor Golinski stated that on the bright side the electrical aggregation will save the average resident about$32 a month and the new garbage contract will save residents about$4 a month. The Council is doing what it can to save residents in other areas. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-2 Spears-nay, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-nay,Kot-aye,Munns-aye PARK BOARD No report. PLAN COMMISSION Ordinance 2012-19 Approving Amendments to the Method and Procedure of Establishing Planned Unit Developments in the City (PC 2012-01) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving amendments to the method and procedure of establishing planned unit developments in the City and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble discussed this ordinance,which has been in the works for about a year. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—June 26, 2012—Page 9 of 11 Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye, Kot-aye,Munns-aye, Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS No report. CITY COUNCIL REPORT Ordinance 2012-20 Directing the Sale of Real Property (EDC 2012-20) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance directing the sale of real property and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Munns, seconded by Alderman Colosimo. Alderman Milschewski is not against having a new business in the downtown. With the looming Rec Center decision coming up, she is hesitant to sell a property that the City may need down the road. Alderman Colosimo was apprehensive, at first, about getting rid of the post office due to the Rec Center decision. He has taken the time to meet with Mr.Leslie, and would like to hear his full proposal. All the Council is being asked to do tonight is to listen to Mr. Leslie's proposal.Alderman Colosimo was impressed with the little information that he heard. If the Council votes against this opportunity then the Council may be passing up a very good opportunity to develop Yorkville's riverfront. Alderman Funkhouser voted no previously but was one of the four aldermen that brought this back onto the agenda. There are no strings attached to listen to Mr. Leslie.The Council would not be doing its due diligence if they did not hear Mr. Leslie out. If the client does not meet what the Council feels comfortable with,it will not be approved. That is up to the Council.Alderman Munns stated the RFP is the procurement process to bring structure to the whole process. Bring out the good and the bad. The RFP is just looking for a developer to wow the Council with something special for the downtown to provide activity for everyone. Somebody has to start with the first piece. It doesn't all come at the same time. The City has been trying for a long time to do the downtown. The City has to start some business but has to have something to connect the two sides and get people to go there. Downtown recreation attracts more people, which attract more business,which will bring in retail tax revenues and add jobs. It relieves the burden of the taxpayer if the businesses are paying more taxes. He supports the Council hearing this proposal. Alderman Kot's problem with moving ahead is that the Council is giving the false impression that the City will sell this property. He can't say the City can at this point. This is the worst possible time to be selling anything. He would rather wait six months and put this back on the agenda.He will not support this. Alderman Gilson agrees with Alderman Kot and Alderman Milschewski. Alderman Teeling believes the Council should look at this proposal and should give everyone an opportunity to know what the proposal is about. The irony of this whole thing is that the Council is talking about a building that is bringing nothing into the City. Alderman Spears didn't get any information until five minutes before the meeting. The discussion in COW was to leave it and have the Council address this in six months. She believes that was an excellent idea. She can't support this and doesn't believe the City is in any position to sell any property. Alderman Milschewski wanted to clarify that she is not against the RFP. She just thinks the timing is off. Mayor Golinski said it looks like he will be breaking the vote. Alderman Munns stated keep in mind that the post office is not going to provide much space for programming even if the Rec Center goes down. If the City puts offices or recreation activities in the post office then the City is taking away the prime river residential space that is potentially millions of dollars to the City. He thinks it is a waste to use that space for recreational activities.Alderman Gilson said the City used a building similar to that size before for recreational space.He feels it is just a bad time until the City knows what it is going to do with the Rec Center. Alderman Colosimo stated the logic behind that is flawed. The City is talking about river front property. If the old post office goes to private hands and gets back on the tax roll,just the property taxes of that building alone would allow the City the same square footage building. Then those same recreational activities go back into a different building that is not on riverfront property. He hopes the Council members voting no will reconsider. Mayor Golinski stated the one thing that attracted him to Yorkville was the downtown area. He is a big supporter of Yorkville's downtown.He believes it can be so much more. He believes the Council will be doing a great disservice to Yorkville's citizens if does not hear more on this proposal. City Administrator Olson laid out the process. If the RFP is approved then there will be a scaled proposal submitted to the City. It will be opened at a City Council meeting and read aloud,by law. After it is read, it can be approved at any time. The Council is not obligated to approve anything. All bids can be rejected at that time or at a later time. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-5 Nays-4 Spears-nay, Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-nay, Teeling-aye, Gilson-nay,Kot-nay,Munns-aye, Golinski-aye The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—June 26, 2012—Page 10 of 11 CITY COUNCIL REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY& LIAISON REPORT YBSD Alderman Gilson reported on the YBSD meeting on June 11,2012.Minutes were approved. Several bills and invoices were approved for goods and services. There was approval to transfer$225,000 from the districts checking account to the money market account. One million was to be reinvested in a CD at the State Bank of Illinois. There were updates given on the 21 grease trap inspections. There were discussions on the FOG ordinance,Fox River Study Group meeting, and the Ultimate Sports Bar issues. There were updates on conferences and the district website.New business items were discussed, also. Agency on Aging Alderman Spears reported on the Agency on Aging. (See Attached) Social Security Trustees Report Alderman Spears reported on the Social Security Trustees Report. The annual report had been released. The recession and the slow recovery have reduced payroll tax revenue to the system. This forced some people to start receiving retirement benefits earlier than expected. More people have filed for disability who might have otherwise continued to work. The system will have to start dipping into the trust fund. Payroll tax plus interest on the trust fund will not be sufficient to pay off benefits in 2021. The trust fund is not projected to be completely exhausted by 2033. The system would not be bankrupt at that point since it will still have enough payroll tax revenue to pay approximately 75%of benefits. The social security system is not currently in deficit. Total revenue includes interest on the trust fund. Ken Com Alderman Spears reported on the Ken Corn board meeting. They discussed the construction of the new towers. She invited everyone to see the new facilities and receive a tour. School Board Alderman Funkhouser was unable to attend the school board meeting, so he did not have a report to give. ADHOC Alderman Funkhouser stated there will be meeting on July 9, 2012 with the YMCA to discuss the joint proposal. Ribs on the River Alderman Funkhouser stated Ribs on the River is coming up on July 14,2012. Police Department Alderman Teeling thanked the police department who removed a raccoon that was on her property. STAFF REPORT Watering Restrictions City Administrator Olson discussed the watering restrictions in Yorkville. 4th of July Parade City Administrator Olson reminded residents of the July 4th parade. It is held in Yorkville's park. This will be held at 9:00 am on July 4th. The float is available for the City staff. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Update on Route 47 Project Alderman Spears asked if the Council has gotten an update on Route 47. City Administrator Olson stated there has been no timeline given. Countryside Center Road Maintenance And Snow Plowing Alderman Spears asked if the City got any information from the fire department. City Administrator Olson stated the fire department is still reviewing plans. Committee Of A Whole Alderman Spears stated the City brought forward the procedural ordinance of the COW. It was a consensus by the Alderman. How is the City going to work that?Mayor Golinski stated the committee of a whole is committee of the whole. Everyone votes in COW. Alderman Spears hopes the Council does The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—June 26, 2012—Page 11 of 11 not consider making the COW meetings permanent. There is too much to review in the time period given for that type of meeting. Alderman Teeling asked and it was confirmed that the same agenda items come from the committees. Parking On Mill Street Alderman Milschewski had a question in regards to parking on Mill Street between Van Emmon and Fox. She had received an e-mail from a concerned citizen. There was discussion between Alderman Milschewski and Public Works Director Dhuse in regards to the parking on Mill Street. Tree Program Alderman Milschewski asked about the tree program. Director of Parks and Recreation Schraw stated that it is on the website. Sunflower Alderman Colosimo asked if the plan site issue at Sunflower has been taken care o£ Public Works Director Dhuse said he believes it has. Steps have been taken to get the signs replaced. Northwest Hot Tubs Street Repair Alderman Gilson asked if anyone had contacted Northwest Hot tubs and the bank to find out whether or not the bank can repair the road that goes in front of their facility. City Administrator Olson stated they have touched base with them and will have a discussion regarding this issue. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to go into Executive Session for the purpose of: 1. For the appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific employees of the public body or legal counsel for the public body, including hearing testimony on a complaint lodged against an employee of the public body or against legal counsel for the public body to determine its validity. 2. For litigation, when an action against, affecting, or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting. So moved by Alderman Funkhouser; seconded by Alderman Kot. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-5 Nays-4 Spears-nay,Milschewski-nay, Colosimo-nay,Kot-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Munns-nay, Golinski-aye The City Council entered Executive Session at 10:59 p.m. The City Council returned to regular session at 11:32 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to adjourn the meeting. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. Adjournment of the meeting was unanimously approved by a viva voce vote. Meeting adjourned at 11:33 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Beth Warren, City Clerk, City of Yorkville, Illinois Reviewed By: �� •s► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ Mayor#1 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number �+'j_ Community Development ❑ CC 2012-53 '7( �V� Police F-1 L E Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Patrol Officers and the City Meeting and Date: City Council—July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Approval of a bargaining agreement with the Fraternal Order of Police, officers unit. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: The agreement will be made available to the public, pending final discussion in executive session. Reviewed By: �� •s► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ Mayor#2 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number �+'j_ Community Development ❑ CC 2012-54 Police F-1'7(LE V� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Sergeants and the City Meeting and Date: City Council—July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Approval of a bargaining agreement with the Fraternal Order of Police, Sergeant's unit. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: The agreement will be made available to the public, pending final discussion in executive session. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 606 Legal ❑ PS #1 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number me Human Resources F-1 C "Sad 3! Cf Community Development ❑ `,� PS 2012-16 Parks&Recreation Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Lightning Detectors Meeting and Date: CC July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Estimates to install additional lightning detectors are attached. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: COW 6/10/12 Action Taken: Forward to City Council Item Number: PS 2012-16 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Table until August 14th COW. Submitted by: Laura Schraw Parks & Recreation Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Please see the attached memo providing additional information. c►ry0 Memorandum esr. 1ss6 To: City Council From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation � �� (1) CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator �;is °°° °, �4 Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks <LE Date: July 19, 2012 Subject: Lightning Detectors Backl4round At the June 14th Park Board meeting, it was requested by the Mayor that staff research the cost for a lightning detector to be installed at Bridge Park where our three ballfield complex is located. Quotes for lightning detectors were obtained from our current vendor of tornado warning sirens, ThorGuard,with a variety of options. On June 15th, staff contacted the representative from ThorGuard. In order to get the detectors up as soon as possible, the meeting was held on the earliest possible date for both parties, June 25' . Potential locations for lightning detectors, remote systems, and the existing system were discussed. A site tour was conducted, and a quote was requested from the ThorGuard representative to be received by June 29th, which they provided. Staff provided a recommendation to COW, solely based on what parks/schools would be beneficial for lightning detectors and based on the estimated cost provided in the ThorGuard estimate, and within the available funds from the weather warning siren fee. Staff was not actively seeking a vote of authorization at the July 24th City Council meeting—the statement by Administrator Olson at the meeting that we were seeking purchase authorization based on one quote was a simple misunderstanding of the agenda item. On July 17th staff met with the Dr. Wakeley, Superintendent of Schools, and he is interested in discussing funding for lightning detection system(s)by the school district with his board. The next School Board meeting is on July 23rd and he is planning on providing the information to them at that time. Since COW agreed with staff to proceed with the recommended facilities and locations, quotes from 5 companies (U.S. and Canada) were sought; one company does not do municipal detection systems, and only one other company has responded to staff's inquiries as of the date of this memo with quotes for lightning detectors. With that information in hand, and while waiting for a formal response from the School District Board, staff recommends that this agenda item be tabled until the August 14th Committee of the Whole meeting. Product comparison Biotex This company only manufactures warning systems that detect the proximity of lightning to the station location, not when the conditions are right for lightning. ThorGuard The ThorGuard information distributed at the previous meeting is also attached. Additional information about the GENS system: It was designed in conjunction with the University of South Florida. They wanted a system that could give a distinct audible signal over their entire campus. Since ThorGuard was already in use for the Lightning Warning over the campus they designed a system that could do both. The units are located at the schools in the school office or the campus security office. The audible for GENS is 1/2 second on, 1/2 second off, for a one minute duration. It also turns on external strobe lights on the horn clusters. This is done manually for the GENS alert. Those outdoors proceed to designated areas away from the school, directed by faculty that are in charge. TOA Staff has not yet received a response from this manufacturer. Skyscan This product is a lightning warning system. It is similar to the Vaisala product(listed below) that does not provide a warning signal based on the conditions being right for lightning,but instead on the proximity of lightning to the station location. The representative gave an example of predicting lightning within 40 miles of the station. Vaisala Vaisala produces the TWX300, product information is attached. The TWX300 ties into the National Lightning Detection Network which monitors existing lightning and the EFM measure the electromagnetic fields to alert when the conditions are ripe for lightning. The ballpark pricing for a TWX300 with EFM's is between $70,000 4120,000 per system. This price includes training and installation. A second system would cost an additional $70,000-$120,000. The total cost for the Vaisala produce is between $140,000-$240,000. In addition, the annual National Lightning Detection Network renewal fee (for a 50 mile radius) is $3,500 per site. Park Board recommendation The Park Board fully supports installing lightning detector systems at Bridge Park, and Raintree Park B, as well as a remote system at Bristol Bay 65. Laura Schraw July 17,2012 United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville,Illinois 60506 Reference:Revised Quote,Thor Guard lightning Warning System.Per email received July 17,2012. EQUIPMENT PRICE Bridge Park,Base L 75R Computer console and Sensor,THOR PCX Software $ 7,695.00 VOTBDFM12B Base Driver 12 Watt Transmitter/Horn Cluster $ 4,000.00 Line Conditioner UPS $ 250.00 External LED Strobe Light $ 250.00 Bristol Bay Park,Remote VOTRCFMS Receiver/Horn Cluster/ 12 Volt Solar Charged/Antenna Kit External Strobe Light $ 3,900.00 EQUIPMENT COST $16,095.00 APPROXIMATE Freight Charges FOB Sunrise,Florida $ 250.00 INSTALLATION $ 3,700.00 The facility is responsible for supplying and installing a 6"x 6"x 20' wood pole for remote if appropriate location is not available. Total Cost $20,045.00 Option: Grand Reserve School Remote VOTRCFMS Receiver/Horn Cluster/ 12 Volt Solar Charges/Antenna Kit External Strobe Light $ 3,900.00 APPROXIMATE Freight Charges FOB Sunrise,Florida $ 75.00 INSTALLATION $ 750.00 The facility is responsible for supplying and installing a 6"x 6"x 20' wood pole for remote if appropriate location is not available. Total Cost $4,725.00 Page 2. EQUIPMENT PRICE Autumn Creek School L 75R Computer Console, Sensor,THORPCX Software $ 7,695.00 VOTBDFM5B Driver 5 Watt Transmitter/Horn cluster $ 3,500.00 Line Conditioner UPS $ 250.00 External LED Strobe Light $ 250.00 Internal LED Strobe Light $ 175.00 EQUIPMENT COST $11,870.00 APPROXIMATE Freight Charges FOB Sunrise,Florida $ 250.00 INSTALLATION $ 4,000.00 Total Cost $16,120.00 EQUIPMENT PRICE Raintree Park B Base L 75R Computer Console, Sensor,THORPCX Software $ 7,695.00 VOTBDFM5B Driver 5 Watt Transmitter/Horn Cluster $ 3,500.00 Line Conditioner UPS $ 250.00 External Strobe Light $ 250.00 Internal Strobe Light $ 175.00 EQUIPMENT COST $11,870.00 APPROXIMATE Freight Charges FOB Sunrise,Florida $ 250.00 INSTALLATION $ 4,000.00 Total Cost $16,120.00 EQUIPMENT PRICE Current System 12 watt transmitter $750.00 Receiver $500.00 Base antenna kit $100.00 Receiver antenna kit @$85.00 each(x2) $170.00 Total Cost $1,520.00 Prices a valid for 90 days from the Quote Date.Equipment can ship in 14 business days from day of order.A Purchase Order#is required along with a completed customer information form. Walt Wynarczyk Territory Manager HOR __ GUARD, INC. April 17,2012 integrated Lightning Prediction and Waming Systems Ms. Laura Schraw United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60140 Dear Ms. Schraw: Thank you for requesting information on THOR GUARD integrated lightning prediction and warning systems. We manufacture these systems in southern Florida as we have for more than 30 years, and stand alone in offering the world's only true lightning PREDICTION system. No company has been manufacturing lightning warning systems for as long as THOR GUARD and no other system can approach our safety record. THOR GUARD uses a highly sophisticated sensor and computer to measure and analyze the electrostatic field in the atmosphere. Lightning originates within this field,thus allowing THOR GUARD to make calculations predicting its occurrence, even though there may be no visible evidence of lightning. Only THOR GUARD can provide advance warning of a first strike or the very dangerous side and back strikes. Unlike THOR GUARD, lightning "detection" systems require the occurrence of an actual lightning strike before a warning is given. According to the Severe Storms Laboratories in Norman, OK, 85% of all deaths and injuries occur away from a storm cell, so reacting to a strike which has already occurred within 5 to 10 miles is frequently too late! THOR GUARD's PREDICTION capability also minimizes false alarms without the use of filters, a significant departure from even the best detection systems, all of which are prone to unnecessary and costly shutdowns! THOR GUARD is the only stand-alone lightning warning device used by the USGA, AJGA, LPGA and the PGA of America Junior Series. We are the choice of Froward County, Hamilton County, OH, Park Ridge, IL, Orange County, FL, Paramus, NJ, Lewis, TX, Centennial Olympic Park, GA, Northern Virginia Regional Parks and more than 1,000 other city parks and municipalities in the United States. The flexibility of our system allows the client to choose the amount of advance warning time considered necessary for students, family and friends to proceed to a safe location. Couple our PREDICTION capability with a Voice of THOR horn/strobe light warning system or our one-piece THORGUARDIAN,you have a true,automatic advance warning package second to none! Responding to the call for an emergency notification system for schools and parks, THOR GUARD has introduced its Guardian Emergency Notification System (GENS). Available as a stand-alone device or built into our lightning prediction systems,the GENS will issue a one or two minute horn blast(very different than our lightning alerts)and facilitate email messaging instructions through our THOR PCX software. Already in use at many schools like University of Miami, the GENS will make your area safer with ease of use and efficient messaging. While single- purpose emergency systems cost considerably more than THOR GUARD, a cost-effective THOR GUARD/GENS system can be used every day for lightning prediction and the GENS accessed if you ever need more! THOR GUARD has provided accurate and dependable lightning protection for a broad base of clients since 1974. This represents literally hundreds of millions of hours of safe operations for clients that range from the U.S. Government, airlines, state and local agencies, the explosives industry, and schools, to a variety of recreational users.It is THOR GUARD's unique ability to PREDICT lightning that continues to make a reliably safe difference. Ms. Schraw, if you would like to take the next step towards a safer facility, contact me at Extension 104, or your local sales representative, Walt Wynarczyk, at(708)989-8273. Sincerely, Robert M. Dugan President 1193 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway . Sunrise, Florida 33323 . Tel: (954) 835-0900 . Fax: (954) 835-0808 www.thorguard.com I N N 0 V A T 1 0 N S Lightning Prediction InstantBths One year afftter er the deadly bolt struck John Scott Wade,the new system was installed and dedi- cated in his memory.Ironically, less than two hours after the ded- ication of the system,on June 20 1 of this year,the warning alarm was activated at Hinklev Park, B Y S T E V E N K M E Y E R interrupting organized baseball and volleyball games.Baseball officials and park district stab ALITI LE MORETHt1N ONE Bring all parks,schools and play- cleared the fields and courts as year ago,a tragic acci- T ing Fields. instructed.Ten minutes later, dent occurred on a soccer no= lightning stuck the middle of the field at Northeast Park in the # _ Decisions and Dollars baseball diamond, knocking out Park Ridge Recreation and Park _ Matters of zones,times of opera- a light pole and an irrigation District.After a short rain delay Novo tion,testing, noise levels and system.One boy who cleared the in the game,the skies started Master Alarm Control (MAC) installation procedures needed to baseball diamond said he felt the clearing and a referee decided to be worked out.The special pro- lightning from where he sought resume play.A rogue lightening jects technician for the parks shelter. bolt—some called it a"bolt out department became the district Had the warning signal not of the blue"--struck a young and in the air.Lightning is created liaison and worked on coordinat- been activated,had the system man named John Scott Wade. within the earth's invisible electro- ing installation. not been operational,would CPR and quick medical atten- static atmosphere.The charges, tion couldn't save him. which are invisible to the naked Four groups,the Park Ridge eye,always build prior to lightning Recreation and Park District, occurrences.When conditions Nnety-seven Youth Baseball,Indian Scours indicate that lightning is probable, and the Park Ridge Rotary Club a signal is sent to horns which percent of the time when the alarm system is formed a committee in an effort sound an eight-to-I2-minute to minimize lightening-related warning to clear the area and seek activated, lightning is visible within 15 injuries.Research on available shelter.Ninety-seven percent of the lightning detection and predic- time when the alarm system is acti- tion systems led them to a vated,lightning is visible within 15 to 30 minutes. system used at the Atlanta to 30 minutes.Other times light- Olympic Games and on golf ning is extremely probable.An all- The system would cover 18 there have been another tragic courses nationwide. clear signal announces when it's park and school sites in three f event?Three people were injured safe to return to the area. zones.The committee decided and one killed by lightning that Citywide Protection Although the company had the system should be operational night in the Chicago area. Committee members quickly con- never taken on a project of this from 8 a.m, to 11 p.m.on a Thankfully,due to the foresight curred that the Thor Guard system magnitude,Park Ridge agreed to daily basis from April to Novem- and planning of the committee was the best solution for Park be the first to test a city- ber,with horns and systems to be and the generous donations from Ridge.'fhesystem consists of wide lightning predic- tested monthly during the opera- the community, no one in Park sensors that mrI:,tre =. lion system tional period. Ridge was injured. electrostatic cov- The committee also began charges at Fund raising efforts to cover the Steven It: director of'ahe ground projected cost of$55,000.Sup- Park Ridge Recreation and Park levri - pQrt for the system was citywide. District in Park Ridge,Ill. Donations came from youth and adult sports teams,school dis- _ triers and 11TOs,service -W = �,,1 organizations,local tj hospitals,the x United Way and the z City itself. Remote bore cluster. N0V LM BF R1 ❑ L1' Lr1BF. R 1117 PUBLIC RISK 29 � I I LFl~■rl � Mfl Bolts From the Blue Some form of lightning prediction or detection Is better than none, experts say. Robert Esmail didn't know what hit him.One second,the 48-year-old was walking with his friend Steve Plutz on Elgin, Ill.'s Wing Park Golf Course; the next, he was abruptly thrown back by a deadly bolt of lightning. No bright flash. No sharp crack. Amazingly, Esmail remained conscious during the entire June 2 episode and later told the Chicago Tribune that the strike felt like a blow to the chest from either a base- ball bat or a linebacker. The bolt entered his right hip, where it left a three-inch-long "red and raw" mark, and exited his body via his foot.Plutz,who also was struck,died two days later from injuries to his brain, heart and Iungs. "It doesn't always take a tragedy to get officials to move; unfortunately, it takes a tragedy and a lawsuit," says Bob The incident, which occurred on city-owned property, Dugan, president of Sunrise, Fla.-based Thor Guard, the prompted Elgin municipal leaders to reconfigure their only manufacturer currently producing a lightning pre- priorities and move the planned installation of lightning diction system that identifies electrostatic energy condi- prediction systems to the top of their to-do list. By mid- tions conducive to lightning activity and emits an instant July, the city council approved spending $65,000 for warning. According to Dugan, facility operators are lightning prediction devices at The Highlands and Wing Park golf courses,as well as popular Lords Park. "A long often under the false impression that if they don't have blast signals that people should take cover. A series of any sort of protection, they can't be sued in the event of shorter blasts signals an all-clear," parks and recreation a strike. But the suits keep coming, and so do the dam- director Randy Reopelle told the Tribune. "We're going ages. "Most of those suits are settled out of court in favor to have to implement an education program to train peo- of the plaintiff," he says. "Relying on the ?act of God' ple how to react." defense doesn't work." I Lightning education has been a goal of outdoor sports Lightning, weather's most dangerous and frequently and recreation administrators for the past decade, ever encountered hazard, caused almost 500 deaths in the since Park Ridge, Ill., located 27 miles from Elgin, United States between 1995 and 2004--but fewer annu- became the first community in the country to introduce al fatalities have been reported in recent years,according lightning prediction technology to parks in 1997. That to the National Weather Service and the National initial $49,000 investment came after 20-year-old Scott Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. By compari- Wade was struck by lightning while officiating a youth son, lightning struck and killed more than 3,235 individ- soccer game. uals between 1959 and 1994. Nowhere is lightning more prone to strike in the United The Georgia High School Association recently mandat States than Florida, which the U.S. National Lightning ed that all 402 member schools provide at least handheld Detection Network lists as having the most lightning devices for all outdoor activities during the 2006-07 flashes per square mile. That's one reason why Brevard school year, and some principals and athletic directors Public Schools in Viera, Fla., spent a reported $350,000 have upgraded to permanent systems instead. Schools during the summer to install lightning prediction systems were asked to determine how many handheld units they at all middle schools, high schools and athletic fields in needed(typically at least two or three)and find their own the district-17 sites in all. funding sources, says Gary Phillips, the GHSA's assis- Meanwhile, on the other side of Florida's Lake tant executive director. The association also purchased Okeechobee, the Broward County Parks and Recreation 14 handheld devices for use by its staffers at state tour- Division installed lightning prediction devices at six naments and other events. parks in 2005 and dedicated more than$92,000 to install systems at seven additional parks this year.The county is Phillips says the idea to equip schools with some sort of no stranger to lightning-related fatalities:On July 20,3 8- protection stems from the 2004 boys'state track and field year-old Edward Hidalgo was riding an ATV in the championships at Jefferson High School. When nasty Everglades when he became the ninth person since 1993 storms moved in that May weekend, lightning struck a to be felled by a lightning bolt within Broward County's transformer that exploded into a ball of fire and plum- borders. And the Broward County School District—fol- meted to the ground, injuring several spectators and lowing the October 2005 death of 15-year-old Monarch burning the hair off one coach's arm. "Here we were, High School junior varsity football player Schaffner asking schools to host all of these tournaments and out- Noel as his team took shelter during a game delay—was door activities, but we weren't helping them prepare for among the first organizations in the nation to subscribe sudden weather changes," Phillips says. "We needed to to Weatherbug?, a provider of live Iocal weather condi- do that. It's a minor imposition that in the end will make tions via the Internet and mobile communications venues safer for everybody." devices. It's not too early for facility operators to begin thinking Although grant money from various sources can be about next spring and how best to arm themselves—and applied to the purchase of a lightning prediction system, the individuals responsible for overseeing athletic and which generally sells for between $6,000 and $9,000, recreation events—against Mother Nature's electrical Weatherbug and similar services such as WeatherData? whims. Some form of detection or prediction is better provide some degree of protection for schools and other than none,experts say, because today's systems can alert organizations unable to make major financial commit- people in charge of games, practices and other outdoor ments to weather safety. Plus, unlike lightning-specific recreation activities to lightning threats not visible to the i equipment,the latter services alert subscribers to all vari- human eye.As Dugan warns, "Just because you don't see eties of pending weather emergencies—from blizzards to lightning doesn't mean it's safe." tornadoes. Just ask Robert Esmail. Other lower-cost alternatives are handheld lightning detection devices such as SkyScan? and ThunderBolt?, Michael Popke which range in price from around $100 to $500 each. Whereas lightning prediction systems assess atmospher- ic conditions likely to produce future lightning strikes within a given area, handheld detection units pinpoint where lightning strikes have occurred within a predeter- mined radius and estimate their range, approach speed, time of arrival and severity. HOR THORGUARDIAN ._'' UARDa INC. LIGHTNING PREDICTION SYSTEM The THORGUARDIAN is the first,totally integrated advance warning system for lightning. The sensor continuously monitors the atmosphere's electrostatic energy as far away as 15 miles and evaluates the potential for lightning within an area approximately 2 miles in radius. When the system determines a hazardous condition, the air-horns and strobe light -- provide necessary alerts. As a leader in lightning prediction, THOR GUARD has advanced its state of the art lightning prediction 1 technology by the development of its propriety L125 prediction computer. The entire system can be easily installed outdoors as a single unit, or the control box can be located HOR3wutUUn' separately.Under normal conditions,the air horns have a range of approximately 700 yards, in a 360' pattern. An external status LED indicates THORGUARDIAN is operational. FEATURES • THOR GUARD L125 lightning prediction computer. • LCD provides immediate lightning/ system status. • Sensor, Strobe, Air-horns, Mtg. Bar & Tripod included. • • User - hours of operation, selectable by day. • 12 selectable ranges permits desired sensitivity. • Designed for continuous unattended operation. !: I • Automatic system status ensures timer opetation • Automatic notification, both visual and audible, of "RED - ALERT" and "ALL - CLEAR" conditions. • Strobe light that remains on during "RED ALERT". • AC Power 0 20V) or Optional Solar Power. • RS232 port (DB9) allows interface to users computer providing data forTHOR GUARD's THORPCX(Optional) *W visual display and storm storage software. • Audible notification for low battery or test failure. • High performance long life rechargeable battery. ■ ■ SELECTED SPECIFICATIONS Models: THORGUARDIAN Power Requirement: Voltage: 120 Volts VAC,60 Hz,Single Phase Power: .25A,30 Watts »Optional Solar Power Using 40 Watt Panel } Power Supply. Wall Mounted Transformer, 120V,60 Hz Safety Requirements: UL,CSA,VDE Power Cord: UL,CSA,SJT 6 Ft.Grounded Hyperstatic AC Protection:Circuit Breaker/Switch Sensor Enclosure Control Box: Dimensions: 13"W x 6 112"D x 15 114"H Safety Requirements: UL,CSA,Type 4X Material:Sealed Gray Fiberglass Enclosure Weight:26 Lbs. Model L 125 THOR GUARD: Dimensions: 7.325"W x 6"D x 1.5'H Power: 12V DC(Supplied by System Battery) Safety Requirements: FCC Part, 15 Class B Hyperstatic Sensor. Dimensions:4'W x 13"H Weight: 2 Lbs. (Excluded Cable) Construction: PVC-Sealed Mounting: 1" Diameter Pipe VOT Horn Sensor Cable: West Penn 5992 (Optional Plenum Cable) 318" Dia. Double Shielded Triaxial with Teflon Core Standard Lengths Available 75ft., 125ft., 150 ft. (200 ft.Max. Length) VOT Air Horn Cluster. Dimensions: 19"W x 14.5"H Material: Fiberglass; Dome& Horn Mounting Plate Weight: 13 Lbs. (Excludes Cable) Cable: General Cable 234600 12AWG(UL)Type TC-ER Sound Output: 11 3d® 1 Oft., 700 Yard Radius,Typical Coverage Power: 12VDC,(Supplied By System Battery) TX Strobe Light: Manufacture:Whelen 51 Series(UL) Listed _T Dimensions:3.90"H x 5.2" Dia. _ Light Output: LED High Intensity Multi-Flash,Amber = - Cable:West Penn AQ224, 18AWG 2-Conductor Length:Standard 12 ft.,40 ft.(Additional Lengths Available) Weight: 1 Lb. LED Strobe (Specifications&features subject to change without notice) Light THOR GUARD, Inc. 1193 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway, Sunrise, FL 33323 Tel (954) 835-0900 (888) 571-1212 Fax (954) 835-0808 E-mail: sales@thorguard.com www.thorguard.com REV 11.1 CfTy Reviewed By: X06 Legal Agenda Item Number Finance El ADM#1 EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 : Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ ' �'� Police F] ADM 2012-32 ALE � Public Works Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Solid Waste RFP—Vendor Selection and Solid Waste Collection Contract Meeting and Date: City Council—July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Approval of a solid waste collection contract with Veolia for August 1, 2012 through April 30, 2017. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Resolution No. 2012- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR GARBAGE, REFUSE, RECYCLING AND YARD WASTE COLLECTION SERVICES WITH VEOLIA ES SOLID WASTE MIDWEST,LLC WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposal for solid waste and recyclable collection services; and, WHEREAS, the City received Requests for Proposals and reviewed said proposals to determine the proposal that is in the best interest of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that to enter into a contract with Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC as further described herein and attached hereto is in the best interest of the City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That the CONTRACT FOR GARBAGE, REFUSE, RECYCLING AND YARD WASTE COLLECTION attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved, and Gary J. Golinski, Mayor, and Beth Warren, City Clerk, be and are hereby authorized to execute said Contract on behalf of the United City of Yorkville. Section 2. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and approval as provided by law. Resolution No.2012- Page 1 Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2012. MAYOR Resolution No.2012- Page 2 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CONTRACT FOR GARBAGE, REFUSE, RECYCLING AND YARD WASTE COLLECTION THIS CONTRACT made this day of 2012, by and between the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation hereinafter called the "City" and Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC, located at 1660 Hubbard Avenue, 2nd Floor, Batavia, Illinois, 60510, hereinafter called the "Contractor". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposal for solid waste and recyclable collection services; and, WHEREAS, the City received Requests for Proposals and reviewed said proposals to determine the proposal that is in the best interest of the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that to enter into a contract with Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC as further described herein and attached hereto is in the best interest of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of their mutual promises and agreements, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: 1. The Contractor agrees to furnish all materials, supplies, tools, equipment, labor and other services necessary to commence and complete the Village's request for garbage, refuse, recycling and yard waste collection services in accordance with the terms and conditions stated in the: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS, TERMS & CONDITIONS, DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS, and their attachments including Vendor W-9 Request Form, Proposer's Certification, Appendix 1 - General Price Quotation Sheet, Appendix 2 - Required Recyclables to be Collected, Appendix 4 — Schedule of Illinois Municipalities Served, Appendix 5 — Location of Disposal Facilities, Appendix 6 — Contractor Qualifications, Exhibit A — Solid Waste Collection Day Map, Exhibit B — Services for Municipal and Public Facilities, RFP Narrative, Amended Certificates of Liability Insurance, Residential Single Stream Recyclable Materials Accepted By Resource Management and Corporate Overview and Capabilities attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit 1 except as amended hereinafter in this Contract. 2. Appendix 1, General Price Quotation Sheet, is clarified by selecting "Yorkville Option A only" as the Plan Description. I 3. Section 23.1 of the Request for Proposals is clarified that the prices quoted are for billing to the City directly and not each individual resident. 4. Section 10.1 is clarified that the indemnification shall be limited to the extent such damages or injuries are caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of Contractor. 5. Section 78.2 is amended to read as follows: STRIKESIFORCE MAJEURE: The Contractor shall be required to file proof with the City Administrator or his designee that it has a"no strike"provision for the duration of all collective bargaining agreements with its workers. Upon execution of any new agreement, the Contractor shall forward to the City Administrator within thirty(30) days thereafter,proof that said agreement also contains a"no strike" clause. In the event of a labor related strike or picketing by Contractor's employees, the Contractor shall exert commercially reasonable efforts to ensure the continuation of its contracted collection services to the City. In the event that the Contractor shall fail to collect, remove and properly dispose of the waste in accordance with the terms of this contract, for a period of five (5) business days or more, the City, may, at its option, cause such waste to be collected and disposed of by any reasonable means available to the City, and the cost thereof may be charged against the Contractor and the performance bond furnished by the Contractor. The foregoing option shall not be available to the City if the Contractor's failure so to collect and remove waste for the period was due to unusual weather conditions, or some other "act of God," which rendered such collection and removal impossible to perform. The Contractor shall not be liable for the failure to perform its duties if such failure was caused by a catastrophe, riot, war, government order or regulation, fire, accident or any similar contingency beyond the reasonable control of the Contractor. "Act of God" does not include any strike, sympathy strike, slowdown, sit-down, stoppage of work, refusal to perform overtime, mass absenteeism, refusal to cross a picket line or any other similar concerted action or intentional interruption or disruption of the operations of the Contractor by Contractor's own employees (the foregoing collectively referred to as "labor dispute"), provided, however, that in the event that the City exercises its option under this Article to collect and dispose of waste by other reasonable means because of the Contractor's failure to perform due to a labor dispute, the total amount charged against the Contractor by the City can only be an amount which is in excess of the total amount that the City would have otherwise paid to the Contractor for collection over the duration of the labor dispute. The Contractor shall promptly notify the City in writing of any event covered by this Section and the date, nature and cause thereof. Such notice shall indicate the anticipated extent of such delay and the obligations under this Agreement to be affected thereby. 2 6. Section 43.11 is clarified that materials to be added to the recycling program shall be by mutual consent of the City and Contractor. 7. Appendix 2 is amended by adding that#6 polystyrene will not be included in the recycling program until such time as there is a sustainable market for that material. 8. Section 30.1 (Change Orders) in the RFP proposal is replaced entirely with the following language: a. At any time additional work is necessary or requested, and the not-to- exceed price is increased thereby, any change, addition or price increase must be agreed to in writing by all parties. The appropriate authorizing signature for the City is the City Administrator. Notwithstanding the foregoing,upon petition from the Contractor tot eh City, the rates amy be increased on a pro-rata basis to reflect any increased costs actually incurred by Contractor due to any unforeseen or unusual change or interpretation in law, increased labor costs, increased fuel costs or increased governmental fee, which increase shall be evidenced by empirical documentation reasonably acceptable to the City provided by contractor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be executed by their duly authorized officials, this Contract as of the day and year first above written: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk CONTRACTOR: By: Print Name and Title Attest: Print Name and Title 3 VEOLIA CNIe RONMCNTAI .. SCI%'eF€ CE SOU � 14VASrE a,t„iF3 3 t3AL iii:,a.ION April 09, 2012 Mr. Bait Olson City Administrator United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Re: Response to the Request for Proposal for Yorkville-Oswego Solid Waste Collection Service Dear Mr. Olson: Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC, ("Veolia") is pleased to submit the attached response to your Request for Proposal for Yorkville-Oswego Solid Waste Collection Service. As an officer of the corporation James M. Rooney, regional Vice President is authorized to sign and submit the attached RFP response. I have also attached the CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY for your reference. Jay has specific oversight responsibility for our Batavia hauling and transfer station companies that currently provide the hauling and disposal services for the United City of Yorkville and who will be providing the services to the Village of Oswego as well. We feel very fortunate that we have been able to provide the refuse, recycling and yard waste collection services to the City for the past five years. We believe that we understand, better than any other contractor, the service expectation of the City. We are excited at the possibility of bringing that service excellence to the Village of Oswego. If requested, Bob Pfister, Regional Municipal Marketing Manager is available to meet with you or you representatives concerning this RFQ response. Bob's contract information is listed below: Bob Pfister Municipal Marketing Manager Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC. 1660 Hubbard Avenue, 2"' Floor Batavia, Illinois 60510 Phone: Email: I am confident that you will look favorably upon our response that we have provided here. If after reviewing our response, you have any questions or require any additional information, we would be pleased to meet with you to discuss your questions. Thank you for allowing Veolia the opportunity to present this RFP response. Sincerely, Robert F. P ster Municipal Marketing Manager 1660 Hubbard Avenue, 2°° Floor, Batavia, f - 60510 tel : 630-762-8000 1 Pax : 630 -587-11" www.veoliaes.com VEOLIA ES SOLID WASTE MIDWEST, LLC CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY I, Michael K. Slattery, do hereby certify that: 1 . I am the duly elected, qualified and acting Secretary of Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company. 2. James Rooney is the Vice President of Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC (the "Company") and as such officer he, or any officer of the Company, is authorized, following compliance with appropriate corporate policies and procedures, to prepare, execute and to submit on behalf of the Company, contracts or service agreements (collectively "Contracts"), or any bids for service or requests for proposals (`Bids and RFPs"), and to execute on behalf of the Company any and all documents required to be submitted in connection with such Contracts, Bids or RFPs. 3 . The Company is not required to and does not maintain a corporate seal. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate in my official capacity as of the 4"' day of June, 2010. Michael K. Slatt REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Name of Proposing Company: Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest LLC Project Name: Yorkville-Oswego Solid Waste Collection Services Proposal No. : Proposal Due: Monday, April 9, 2012 @ 3 :30 pm Proposal Opening: Monday, Apri 19, 2012 @ 3 :31 p.m. Required of All Proposers: Deposit: Two (2) $5,000.00 deposits (one for each municipality) Letter of Capability of Acquiring Performance Bond: Not Required Required of Awarded Contractor: Performance Bond/Letter of Credit: Two (2) $500,000.00 (one for each municipality) Certificate of Insurance: Required Legal Advertisement published: Thursday, March 1 , 2012 Date Issued: Monday, March 12, 2012 This document consists of 45 pages. Return original and two duplicate copies of proposal along with one compact disc with proposal information contained on it in a * .doc (Microsoft Word) or * .pdf (Abode Acrobat) version in a sealed envelope marked with the Proposal Number as noted above to: BART OLSON CITY ADMINISTRATOR UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE, IL 60560 PHONE: 630-553-4350 FAX: 630-553-7575 www.yorkville.il.us 1 The UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE will receive proposals Monday thru Friday, 8 :00 A.M. to 4 :30 P.M. at City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL 60560. SPECIFICATIONS MUST BE MET AT THE TIME THE PROPOSAL IS DUE. Either the Yorkville City Council or the Oswego Village Board reserves the right to accept or reject any and all proposals, to waive technicalities and to accept or reject any item of any proposal. The documents constituting component parts of this contract are the following: I. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS II. TERMS & CONDITIONS III. DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS IV. PROPOSAL/CONTRACT FORM DO NOT DETACH ANY PORTION OF THIS DOCUMENT. INVALIDATION COULD RESULT. Proposers MUST submit an original, 2 additional paper copies and one compact disc of the total proposal. Upon formal award of the proposal, the successful Proposer will receive a copy of the executed contract. 2 I. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 1. GENERAL 1 . 1 Notice is hereby given that United City of Yorkville will receive sealed proposals up to Monday, April 9, 2012 at 3 : 30 p.m. 1 .2 Proposals will be opened and read aloud in the City Council Chambers at Yorkville City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, on Monday, April 9, 2012 at 3 : 31 p.m. 1 .3 Proposals must be received at the United City of Yorkville by the time and date specified. Proposals received after the specified time and date will not be accepted and will be returned unopened to the Proposer. 1 .4 Proposal forms shall be sent to the United City of Yorkville, ATTN: Bart Olson, in a sealed envelope marked "SEALED PROPOSAL" . The envelope shall be marked with the name of the project, date, and time set for receipt of proposals. 1 . 5 All proposals must be submitted on the forms supplied by the City and signed by a proper official of the company submitting proposal . Telephone, email and fax proposals will not be accepted. 1 .6 By submitting this proposal, the proposer certifies under penalty of perjury that they have not acted in collusion with any other proposer or potential Proposer. 1 .7 For purposes of this RFP, all references to the "City" shall mean the United City of Yorkville, and all references to the "Village" shall mean the Village of Oswego. 2, PREPARATION OF PROPOSAL 2. 1 It is the responsibility of the proposer to carefully examine the specifications and proposal documents and to be familiar with all of the requirements, stipulations, provisions, and conditions surrounding the proposed services. 2.2 No oral or telephone interpretations of specifications shall be binding upon the City or the Village. All requests for interpretations or clarifications shall be made in writing and received by the City of Yorkville at least five (5) business days prior to the date set for receipt of proposals. All changes or interpretations of the specifications shall be made by the City of Yorkville in a written addendum to our proposer's of record. 2. 3 In case of error in the extension of prices in the proposal, the hourly rate or unit price will govern. In case of discrepancy in the price between the written and numerical amounts, the written amount will govern. 2.4 All costs incurred in the preparation, submission, and/or presentation of any proposal including any proposer's travel or personal expenses shall be the sole responsibility of the proposer and will not be reimbursed by the City nor the Village. 2.5 The proposer hereby affirms and states that the prices quoted herein constitute the total cost to the City and Village for all work involved in the respective items and that this cost 3 also includes all insurance, royalties, transportation charges, use of all tools and equipment, superintendence, overhead expense, all profits and all other work, services and conditions necessarily involved in the work to be done and materials to be furnished in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents considered severally and collectively. 3. MODIFICATION OR WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS 3 . 1 A Proposal that is in the possession of the City may be altered by a letter bearing the signature or name of person authorized for submitting a proposal, provided that it is received prior to the time and date set for the bid opening. Telephone, email or verbal alterations of a proposal will not be accepted. 3 .2 A Proposal that is in the possession of the City may be withdrawn by the proposer, up to the time set for the proposal opening, by a letter bearing the signature or name of person authorized for submitting proposals. Proposals may not be withdrawn after the proposal opening and shall remain valid for a period of ninety (90) days from the date set for the proposal opening, unless otherwise specified. 4. SECURITY FOR PERFORMANCE 4. 1 The awarded contractor, within thirteen ( 13) calendar days after acceptance of the proposer' s proposal by the City or the Village, shall furnish security for performance acceptable to the respective municipality when required under the documents. Such security shall be either a satisfactory performance bond (bonding company must be licensed to do business in Illinois) or a letter of credit on the form provided by the municipality and available from the municipality's attorney. NOTE: As evidence of capability to provide such security for performance, each proposer shall submit with the proposal either a letter executed by its surety company indicating the proposer's performance bonding capability, or a letter from a bank or savings and loan within twenty-five miles of the corporate boundaries of the City or Village indicating its willingness and intent to provide a letter of credit for the proposer. 5. DELIVERY 5 . 1 All proposal prices are to be quoted, and delivered to the City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL 60560. 6, TAX EXEMPTION 6. 1 The City and the Village is exempt from Illinois sales or use tax for direct purchases of materials and supplies. A copy of the Illinois Sales Tax Exemption Form will be issued upon request. Federal identifications will also be provided to selected vendor. 7. RESERVED RIGHTS 7. 1 Each municipality retains autonomy in decision making for this RFP, and each reserves the exclusive right to waive sections, technicalities, irregularities and informalities and to accept or reject any and all proposals and to disapprove of any and all subcontractors as may be in the best interest of either municipality. Time and date requirements for receipt of proposal will not be waived. 4 II. TERMS AND CONDITIONS 8. MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES 8 . 1 The successful proposer will strictly comply with all ordinances of the awarding municipality and laws of the State of Illinois. 9 USE OF MUNICIPAL NAME 9. 1 The proposer is specifically denied the right of using in any form or medium the name of the City or the Village for public advertising unless express permission is granted by the respective municipality. 10. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT 10. 1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Proposer shall indemnify, keep and save harmless the City and Village and its agents, officers, and employees, against all injuries, deaths, losses, damages, claims, suits, liabilities, judgments, costs and expenses, which may arise directly or indirectly from any negligence or from the reckless or willful misconduct of the Proposer, its employees, or its subcontractors, and the Proposer, its employees, or its subcontractors, and the Proposer shall at its own expense, appear, defend and pay all charges of attorneys and all costs and other expenses arising therefrom or incurred in connection therewith, and, if any judgment shall be rendered against the City and Village in any such action, the Proposer shall, at its own expense, satisfy and discharge the same. This Agreement shall not be construed as requiring the Proposer to indemnify the City and Village for its own negligence. The Proposer shall indemnify, keep and save harmless the City and Village only where a loss was caused by the negligent, willful or reckless acts or omissions of the Proposer, its employees, or its Subcontractors. 11 . NONDISCRIMINATION 11 . 1 Proposer shall, as a party to a public contract: (a) Refrain from unlawful discrimination in employment and undertake affirmative action to assure equality of employment opportunity and eliminate the effects of past discrimination; (b) By submission of this proposal, the Proposer certifies that he is an "equal opportunity employer" as defined by Section 2000(e) of Chapter 21 , Title 42, U.S. Code Annotated and Executive Orders # 11246 and # 11375, which are incorporated herein by reference. The Equal Opportunity clause, Section 6. 1 of the Rules and Regulations of the Department of Human Rights of the State of Illinois, is a material part of any contract awarded on the basis of this proposal. 5 11 .2 It is unlawful to discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, ancestry, age, marital status, sexual orientation, physical or mental handicap or unfavorable discharge for military service. Proposer shall comply with standards set forth in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U. S .C. Secs. 2000 et seq., The Human Rights Act of the State of Illinois, 775 ILCS 5/1 -101 et. seq., and The Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 12101 et. seq. 12. SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY 12. 1 The proposer, as a party to a public contract, shall have a written sexual harassment policy that: 12. 1 . 1 Notes the illegality of sexual harassment; 12. 1 .2 Sets forth the State law definition of sexual harassment; 12. 1 .3 Describes sexual harassment utilizing examples; 12. 1 .4 Describes the Proposer's internal complaint process including penalties; 12. 1 . 5 Describes the legal recourse, investigative and complaint process available through the Illinois Department of Human Rights and the Human Rights Commission and how to contact these entities; and 12. 1 .6 Describes the protection against retaliation afforded under the Illinois Human Rights Act. 13, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 13 . 1 In the event of the Proposer' s non-compliance with the provisions of this Equal Employment Opportunity Clause, the Illinois Human Rights Act or the Rules and Regulations of the Illinois Department of Human Rights ("Department"), the Proposer may be declared ineligible for future contracts or subcontracts with the State of Illinois or any of its political subdivisions or municipal corporations, and the contract may be canceled or voided in whole or in part, and such other sanctions or penalties may be imposed or remedies invoked as provided by statute or regulation. During the performance of this contract, the Proposer agrees as follows: 13 . 1 . 1 That it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap unrelated to ability, sexual orientation, sexual identity or an unfavorable discharge from military service; and further that it will examine all job classifications to determine if minority persons or women are underutilized and will take appropriate affirmative action to rectify any such underutilization. 13 . 1 .2 That, if it hires additional employees in order to perform this contract or any portion thereof, it will determine the availability (in accordance with the Department' s Rules and Regulations) of minorities and women in the area(s) from which it may reasonably recruit and it will hire for each job classification for which employees are hired in such a way that minorities and women are not underutilized. 13 . 1 .3 That, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by it or on its behalf, it will state that all applicants will be afforded equal opportunity without 6 discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap unrelated to ability, or an unfavorable discharge from military services. 13 . 1 .4 That it will send to each labor organization or representative of workers with which it has or is bound by a collective bargaining or other agreement or understanding, a notice advising such labor organization or representative of the Proposer's obligations under the Illinois Human Rights Act and the Department' s Rules and Regulations. If any such labor organization or representative fails or refuses to cooperate with the Proposer in its efforts to comply with such Act and Rules and Regulations, the Proposer will promptly so notify the Department and the contracting agency and will recruit employees from other sources when necessary to fulfill its obligations thereunder. 13 . 1 . 5 That it will submit reports as required by the Department' s Rules and Regulations, furnish all relevant information as may from time to time be requested by the Department or the contracting agency, and in all respects comply with the Illinois Human Rights Act and the Department' s Rules and Regulations. 13 . 1 .6 That it will permit access to all relevant books, records, accounts and work sites by personnel of the contracting agency and the Department for purpose of investigation to ascertain compliance with the Illinois Human Rights Act and the Department' s Rules and Regulations. 13 . 1 .7 That it will include verbatim or by reference the provisions of this clause in every subcontract it awards under which any portion of the contract obligations are undertaken or assumed, so that such provisions will be binding upon such subcontractor. In the same manner as with other provisions of this contract, the Proposer will be liable for compliance with applicable provisions of this clause by such subcontractors; and further it will promptly notify the contracting agency and the Department in the event any subcontractor fails or refuses to comply therewith. In addition, the Proposer will not utilize any subcontractor declared by the Illinois Human Rights Commission to be ineligible for contracts or subcontracts with the State of Illinois or any of its political subdivision or municipal corporations. 14. DRUG FREE WORK PLACE 14. 1 Proposer, as a party to a public contract, certifies and agrees that it will provide a drug free workplace by: 14.2 Publishing a statement: ( 1 ) Notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance, including cannabis, is prohibited in the City' s, Village's, and proposer' s workplace. (2) Specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition. (3 ) Notifying the employee that, as a condition of employment on such contact or grant, the employee will : (A) abide by the terms of the statement; and (B) notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction. 7 14.3 Establishing a drug free awareness program to inform employees about: (1 ) the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) the City's, Village' s or proposer's policy of maintaining a drug free workplace; (3) any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs; (4) the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations. 14.4 Providing a copy of the statement required above to each employee engaged in the performance of the contract or grant and to post the statement in a prominent place in the workplace. 14.5 Notifying the contracting or granting agency within ten ( 10) days after receiving notice of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. 14.6 Imposing a sanction on, or requiring the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program by any employee who is so convicted as required by section 5 of the Drug Free Workplace Act. 14.7 Assisting employees in selecting a course of action in the event drug counseling, treatment and rehabilitation is required and indicating that a trained referral team is in place. 14.8 Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug free workplace through implementation of the Drug Free Workplace Act. 15, PREVAILING WAGE ACT 15 . 1 Proposer agrees to comply with the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act, 820 ILCS 130/1 et seq. , for all work completed under this contract. Proposer agrees to pay the prevailing wage and require that all of its subcontractors pay prevailing wage to any laborers, workers or mechanics who perform work pursuant to this contract or related subcontract. 15 .2 Proposer and each subcontractor shall keep or cause to be kept an accurate record of names, occupations and actual wages paid to each laborer, workman and mechanic employed by the Proposer in connection with the contract. This record shall be open to inspection at all reasonable hours by any representative of the City, Village, or the Illinois Department of labor and must be preserved for four (4) years following completion of the contract. 16. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS — 16. 1 Prior to the beginning of the contract period, Contractor and any Subcontractors shall procure, maintain and pay for such insurance as will protect against claims for bodily injury of death, or for damage to property, including loss of use, which may arise out of operations by the Contractor or Subcontractor or any Sub-Sub Contractor or by anyone employed by any of them, or by anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. Such insurance shall not be less than the greater of coverages and limits of liability specified below for each municipality or any coverages and limits of liability specified in the Contract Documents or coverages and limits required by law unless otherwise agreed to by the City or Village: . 8 (All amounts listed are per municipality) Workers Compensation $5009000 Statutory Employers Liability $ 1 ,000,000 Each Accident $ 1 ,000,000 Disease Policy Limit $ 1 ,000,000 Disease Each Employee Comprehensive General Liability $2,000,000 Each Occurrence $27000,000 Aggregate (Applicable on a Per Project Basis) Commercial Automobile $ 1 ,000,000 Each Accident Liability Umbrella Liability $ 51000,000 16.2 Commercial General Liability Insurance required under this paragraph shall be written on an occurrence form and shall include coverage for Products/Completed Operations, Personal Injury with Employment Exclusion (if any) deleted, Blanket XCU and Blanket Contractual Liability insurance applicable to defense and indemnity obligations and other contractual indemnity assumed under the Contract Documents. 16.3 Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance required under this paragraph shall include coverage for all owned, hired and non-owned automobiles. 16.4 Workers Compensation coverage shall include a waiver of subrogation against the City and the Village. 16.5 Comprehensive General Liability, Employers Liability and Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance may be arranged under single policies for full minimum limits required, or by a combination of underlying policies with the balance provided by Umbrella and/or Excess Liability policies. 16.6 Contractor and all Subcontractors shall have their respective Comprehensive General Liability (including products/completed operations coverage), Employers Liability, Commercial Automobile Liability, and Umbrella/Excess Liability policies endorsed to add the "Village of Oswego and City of Yorkville, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers" as "additional insureds" with respect to liability arising out of operations performed; claims for bodily injury or death brought against City or Village by any Contractor of Subcontractor employees, or the employees of Subcontractor' s subcontractors of any tier, however caused, related to the performance of operations under the Contract Documents. Such insurance afforded to the City and Village shall be endorsed to provide that the insurance provided under each policy shall be Primary and Non-Contributory. 9 16.7 Contractor and all Subcontractors shall maintain in effect all insurance coverages required by the Contract Documents at their sole expense and with insurance carriers licensed to do business in the State of Illinois and having a current A. M. Best rating of no less than A- VIII. In the event that the Contractor or any Subcontractor fails to procure or maintain any insured required by the Contract Documents, the City or Village may, at its option, purchase such coverage and deduct the cost thereof from any monies due to the Contractor or Subcontractor, or withhold funds in an amount sufficient to protect the City or Village, or terminate this Agreement pursuant to its terms. 16.8 All insurance policies shall contain a provision that coverages and limits afforded hereunder shall not be canceled, materially changed, non-renewed or restrictive modifications added, without thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City and Village. Renewal certificates shall be provided to the City and Village not less than five (5) prior to the expiration date of any of the required policies. All Certificates of Insurance shall be in a form acceptable to City and Village and shall provide satisfactory evidence of compliance with all insurance requirements. The City and the Village shall not be obligated to review such certificates or other evidence of insurance, or to advise Contractor or Subcontractor of any deficiencies in such documents, and receipt thereof shall not relieve the Contractor or Subcontractor fi•om, nor be deemed a waiver the right to enforce the terms of the obligations hereunder. The City or the Village shall have the right to examine any policy required and evidenced on the Certificate of Insurance. 17, COPYRIGHT/PATENT INFRINGEMENT 17. 1 The Proposer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and Village against any suit, claim, or proceeding brought against the City or Village for alleged use of any equipment, systems, or services provided by the Proposer that constitutes a misuse of any proprietary or trade secret information or an infringement of any patent or copyright. 18. COMPLIANCE WITH OSHA STANDARDS 18. 1 Equipment supplied to the City and/or Village must comply with all requirements and standards as specified by the Occupational Safety and Health Act. All guards and protectors as well as appropriate markings will be in place before delivery. Items not meeting any OSHA specifications will be refused. 19. CERCLA INDEMNIFICATION 19. 1 In the event this is a contract that has environment aspects, the Awarded Proposer shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and Village, their officers, employees, agents, and attorneys from and against any and all liability, including without limitation, costs of response, removal, remediation, investigation, property damage, personal injury, damage to natural resources, health assessments, health settlements, attorneys' fees, and other related transaction costs arising under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 9601 , et sea ., as amended, and all other applicable statutes, regulations, ordinances, and under common law for any release or threatened release of the waste material collected by the Awarded Proposer, both before and after its disposal. 20. SUBLETTING OF CONTRACT 20. 1 No contract awarded by the City shall be assigned or any part sub-contracted without the 10 written consent of the City Administrator or the Village Administrator. In no case shall such consent relieve the Awarded Proposer from their obligation or change the terms of the contract. 21 . [Section purposefully left blank] 22. TERMINATION OF CONTRACT 22. 1 The City or the Village reserves the right to terminate the whole or any part of this contract, upon ten ( 10) days' written notice to the Awarded Proposer, in the event of default by the Awarded Proposer. Default is defined as failure of the Awarded Proposer to perform any of the provisions of this contract or failure to make sufficient progress so as to endanger performance of this contract in accordance with its terms. In the event that the Awarded Proposer fails to cure the default upon notice, and the City and/or the Village declares default and termination, the City and/or the Village may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as the City or Village may deem appropriate, supplies or services similar to those so terminated. The Awarded Proposer shall be liable for any excess costs for such similar supplies or services unless acceptable evidence is submitted to the City or Village that failure to perform the contract was due to causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Awarded Proposer. Any such excess costs incurred by the City or Village may be set-off against any monies due and owing by the City or the Village, respectively, to the Awarded Proposer. 23. BILLING & PAYMENT PROCEDURES 23 . 1 Separate invoices shall be sent to each municipality, for each municipality' s customers. Payment will be made by each municipality upon receipt of an invoice. Once an invoice has been verified, the invoice will be processed for payment in accordance with the municipality' s payment schedule, policy and procedures. 23 .2 The City and Village shall review in a timely manner each bill or invoice after its receipt. If the City determines that the bill or invoice contains a defect making it unable to process the payment request, the City shall notify the Proposer requesting payment as soon as possible after discovering the defect pursuant to rules promulgated under 50 ILCS 505/1 et seq. The notice shall identify the defect and any additional information necessary to correct the defect. 23 .3 Please send all invoices for the City to the attention of City of Yorkville, Accounts Payable, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL 60560, and all invoices for the Village to Village of Oswego, Accounts Receivable, 100 Parkers Mill, Oswego, IL 60543 , 24. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROPOSER AND THE CITY/VILLAGE 24. 1 The relationship between the City/Village and the Proposer is that of a buyer and seller of professional services and it is understood that the parties have not entered into any joint venture or partnership with the other. 25. STANDARD OF CARE 25 . 1 . Services performed by Proposer under this Agreement will be conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. No other representations express or implied, and no warranty or guarantee is included or intended 11 in this Agreement, or in any report, opinions, and documents or otherwise. 25 .2 If the Proposer fails to meet the foregoing standard, Proposer will perform at its own cost, and without reimbursement from the City and the Village, the professional services necessary to correct errors and omissions caused by Proposer's failure to comply with the above standard and reported to Proposer within one ( 1 ) year from the completion of Proposer' s services for the Project. 26, GOVERNING LAW 26. 1 This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois without regard for the conflict of laws provisions. Venue is proper only in the County of Kendall and the Northern District of Illinois. 27, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS 27. 1 The terms of this Agreement will be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective successors and assigns; provided, however, that neither party will assign this Agreement in whole or in part without the prior written approval of the other. The Proposer will provide a list of key staff, titles, responsibilities, and contact information to include all expected sub Proposers. 28, WAIVER OF CONTRACT BREACH 28 . 1 The waiver by one party of any breach of this Agreement or the failure of one party to enforce at any time, or for any period of time, any of the provisions hereof will be limited to the particular instance and will not operate or be deemed to waive any future breaches of this Agreement and will not be construed to be a waiver of any provision except for the particular instance. 29. AMENDMENT 29. 1 This Agreement will not be subject to amendment unless made in writing and signed by all parties. 30. CHANGE ORDERS 30. 1 The contract price is a "not-to-exceed" cost. At any time additional work is necessary or requested, and the not-to-exceed price is increased thereby, any change, addition or price increase must be agreed to in writing by all parties. The appropriate authorizing signature for the City is the City Administrator and for the Village is the Village Administrator. 31 , SEVERABILITY OF INVALID PROVISIONS 31 . 1 If any provisions of this Agreement are held to contravene or be invalid under the laws of any state, country or jurisdiction, contravention will not invalidate the entire Agreement, but it will be construed as if not containing the invalid provision and the rights or obligations of the parties will be construed and enforced accordingly. 32. NOTICE 32. 1 Any notice will be in writing and will be deemed to be effectively served when deposited in the mail with sufficient first class postage affixed, and addressed to the party at the party's place of business. Notices shall be addressed to the City and Village as follows : 12 To City: City Administrator City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL 60560 To Village: Village Administrator Village of Oswego 100 Parkers Mill Oswego, IL 60543 And to the Proposer as designated in the Contract Form. III, DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS 33. DEFINITIONS 33 . 1 For the purpose of the Contract, definitions of certain terms are listed below. Certain words or phrases, when used in the Contract shall have the same meaning given to them in this section. Other terms shall be defined within applicable subsections and appendices. Attached Single-Family Dwelling (Group, Row, Townhouse) A building originally designed and constructed to accommodate two (2) or more dwelling units, with dwelling units joined together by party wall or walls and being not more than two (2) stories in height. Each unit shall have its own ground floor entrance and living space. Biodegradable shall mean chemically structured material that decomposes rapidly primarily through the action of living soil-borne microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes) or macro-organisms (crickets, slugs, snowbugs, millipedes, etc.). Brown Kraft 2-Ply Paper Bags shall mean a two-layer brown product container comprised of kraft paper most often used to contain groceries. Chipboard shall mean a single-layer cardboard used for packaging cereal, crackers, tissues, and other similar products. Compost(ing) shall mean the process by which aerobic microorganisms decompose organic matter into a humus-like product. Contract shall mean the agreement created by and consisting of the Contract Documents. Contract Documents shall include the Request for Proposals, Terms and Conditions, Detail Specifications and the Proposal /Contract Form. Contractor shall mean the firm with which the City and/or Village has executed the Contract for Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services 13 Corrugated Cardboard shall mean a sturdy paper product commonly used as a packaging consisting of two paper grades — a wavy inner portion and an outside liner. Curbside shall mean adjacent to the street pavement, alley pavement and gutter and within five feet thereof. Customer shall mean the resident party, property owner of a dwelling unit in Yorkville or Oswego corporate boundaries participating in the scavenger collection service. Day shall mean Calendar Day unless otherwise stated. Detached Dwelling A single-family dwelling entirely surrounded by open space. Disposal Unit shall have different meanings as follows: For the purposes of refuse collection, a "disposal unit" shall mean one ( 1 ) 64-gallon, 33-gallon, or 96-gallon tote or one ( 1 ) water-tight metal, or plastic reusable waste container, no larger than thirty-two (32) or thirty-three (33) gallons in capacity, containing refuse, yard-waste or household construction and demolition debris as herein defined; or a securely tied, bundle of refuse or debris which is not placed in a container that does not exceed three (3) feet in diameter, six (6) feet in length, and fifty (50) pounds in weight, or one (1 ) single miscellaneous or odd-shaped item of refuse or debris that does not exceed fifty (50) pounds in weight. A large household item, as herein defined, is to be considered a disposal unit. Household construction and demolition debris, as is herein defined, is to be considered a disposal unit. For the purpose of yard-waste collection, a "disposal unit' shall mean a biodegradable two-ply fifty (50) pound wet-strength kraft paper bag designed for yard-waste collection, not to exceed thirty-three (33) gallons in capacity and fifty (50) pounds in weight, containing "yard-waste" as herein defined, or securely tied, bundles of brush or branches using biodegradable cord, string, rope or twine that does not exceed fifty (50) pounds in weight, two (2) feet in diameter, and four (4) feet in length and is manageable by one ( 1 ) person. For purpose of recycling collection, a "disposal unit' shall mean one (1 ) 64 gallon, 33 gallon, or 96 gallon tote. Envelope shall mean a flat, folded paper container for a letter or smaller object. Frozen Food Packages shall mean paperboard containers with special coatings to prevent tearing of the packages or smearing of the ink from moisture when refrigerated or frozen. Garbage or Rubbish shall mean discarded materials resulting from the handling, cooking, spoilage, and leftovers of food, discarded food or food residues, and paper necessarily used for wrapping same, and all types and kinds of waste materials from housekeeping activities, including, but not limited to ashes, metal cans bottles, books, glass, plastic, newspapers, boxes, cartons, and small amounts of earth, rock or sod, small automobile parts and building materials waste from residential type do-it-yourself projects provided that all such materials are of a size sufficiently small to permit being placed in an approved refuse container, except those items which are banned from direct disposal into a landfill. 14 HDPE shall mean high-density polyethylene. Household Construction and Demolition Debris shall mean waste materials from interior and exterior household construction, remodeling and repair projects, including but not limited to: drywall, plywood and paneling pieces, lumber and other building materials; windows and doors, cabinets, carpeting, disassembled bathroom and kitchen fixtures; and small amounts of sod, earth, clay, sand, concrete, rocks and similar materials. Such debris shall conform to the following: loose small items shall be placed in suitable disposable containers not exceeding fifty (50) pounds in weight, or in bundles not exceeding two (2) feet in diameter, four (4) feet in length, and fifty (50) pounds in weight. Household Garbage shall mean garbage and rubbish as collected from the residents of the City of Yorkville or the Village of Oswego currently receiving curbside scavenger service or on-site dumpster service. Household Garbage — Large Items shall mean any items set forth under "Garbage and Rubbish" above if such item is too large to fit in an approved Disposal Unit including, but not limited to boxes, barrels, crates, furniture, refrigerators, carpets, mattresses, box springs, hot water heaters, stoves and other household appliances, except those items which are banned from direct disposal into a landfill. Household Garbage — Large Items shall not include waste from manufacturing processes, construction materials, broken concrete, lumber, large rocks, automobile parts other than tires or dangerous substances which may create a danger to the health, safety, comfort or welfare of the residents of the City of Yorkville or the Village of Oswego or items which are banned from direct disposal into a landfill. Industrial Wastes shall mean any and all debris and waste products generated by canning, manufacturing, food processing, restaurant, land clearing, building construction or alteration and public works type construction projects whether performed by a governmental unit or by Contract. Juice Boxes shall mean aseptic cartons consisting of a high-grade paperboard coated with polyethylene plastic and aluminum foil, excluding milk cartons. Junk Mail shall mean brochures, advertisements, flyers, post cards, greeting cards, window envelopes, and other similar correspondence. Landscape Waste (also referred to as Yard-waste) shall mean hard landscape waste and soft landscape waste. Large Household Item — Yorkville definition only (also known as "Bulk Item"), shall mean any discarded and unwanted large household appliance such as fi•eezers, stoves, trash compactors, washers, dryers, dishwasher, humidifiers, dehumidifiers, microwaves, water softeners, televisions, pianos, organs, tables, chairs, mattresses, box springs, bookcases, sofas and similar furniture. All "white goods" including those containing CFC's (chlorofluorocarbons), shall fit into this definition. White goods containing switches containing mercury, and PCB ' s (polychlorinated biphenyls) shall not fit into this 15 definition. Large Household Item — Oswego definition only (also known as "Bulk Item"), shall mean any discarded and unwanted pianos, organs, tables, chairs, mattresses, box springs, bookcases, sofas and similar furniture. White goods and other electronic appliances are specifically excluded from Oswego' s definition of "bulk items". LDPE shall mean low density polyethylene. Magazines shall mean periodical publications, usually glue bound. Mixed Papers shall mean stationary, various office papers such as; computer paper, xerox paper, note paper, letterhead, and other similar papers. Multiple-Family Dwelling A dwelling containing three (3) or more dwelling units, with one or both of the following: (a) More than one ( 1 ) dwelling unit connecting to a common corridor or entrance-way; or, (b) Dwelling unit vertically connected to neighboring dwelling units through shared floors and ceilings. PET shall mean polyethylene terephthalate. Performance Bond shall mean the form of security approved by the City or the Village and furnished by the Contractor as a guarantee that the Contractor will execute the work in accordance with the terms of the Contract and will pay all lawful claims. Processing Center shall mean a location to be maintained or utilized by the Contractor for the purpose of sorting, preparing, and marketing of recyclable materials. Properly-Prepared shall mean materials prepared according to the disposal program restrictions for refuse, yard-waste, and recycling. Processing Costs shall mean all reasonable costs incurred by the Contractor with respect to the collection of recyclables from residents currently receiving curbside scavenger services. Public Awareness Program shall mean a program developed and provided by the Contractor and the City/Village to inform and encourage residents to use the recycling collection services and other waste collection and disposal services of the City/Village. Recyclables or Recyclable Material(s) shall mean, at a minimum, those materials listed on Appendix 2. Recycling shall mean the use, collection, and remanufacture of secondary materials as feedstock for the production of new materials or products. Recycling Containers (bins) shall mean a 64 gallon tote, or a 33 -gallon or 94-gallon tote if so acquired by the customer in the manner prescribed in the recycling collection program 16 Refuse shall mean all discarded and unwanted household and kitchen wastes, including but not limited to : food, food residues, and materials necessarily used for packaging, storing, preparing and consuming same, usually defined as "garbage"; and all combustible and non-combustible waste materials resulting from routine domestic housekeeping, including but not limited to: aluminum and steel cans, glass containers, plastic containers, crockery and other containers, metal, paper (of all types), including newspapers, books, magazines, catalogs, boxes and cartons, cold ashes, furniture, furnishings and fixtures, household appliances (all kinds), textiles and leathers, toys and recreational equipment and similar items. For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms "garbage", "refuse", "rubbish", and "waste" shall be synonymous unless otherwise more specifically defined (for example: "yard-waste"). Refuse Sticker shall mean a biodegradable paper stamped with the City or Village name and the Contractor' s name and telephone number providing the solid waste services for the City or Village. The sticker shall represent proof of payment for collection and disposal services to be rendered by the Contractor. Residence shall mean all attached single family and detached single family dwelling. Single-Family Dwelling A detached dwelling containing accommodations for and occupied by one (1 ) family only. Specifications shall mean specifications identified in the Contract. Tote (also referred to as a Toter) A plastic wheeled container in size of 64 gallon, 33 gallon, or 96 gallon with tight-fitting cover, requiring semi-automatic lifting mechanism for collection. Waste shall mean refuse, recyclables, yard or landscape waste and white goods. Wet-strength Carrier Stock shall mean rectangular-shaped paperboard containers with special coatings to prevent tearing of the containers or smearing of the ink from moisture when refrigerated. White Goods shall mean refrigerators, ranges or stoves (electric or gas), freezers, room air conditioners, water heaters and other similar domestic large appliances. Yard-waste container/unit shall mean a container or unit and may be a kraft paper bag not exceeding thirty (34) gallons of capacity weighing up to fifty (50) pounds. The kraft paper bag shall be of the type specifically intended for landscape waste, being specifically biodegradable and not chemically treated; or a waste container (excluding plastic bags) not exceeding thirty-four (34) gallons of capacity weighing up to fifty (50) pounds; or bundles of hard landscape waste not exceeding two (2) feet in diameter and four (4) feet in length weighing up to fifty (50) pounds. Said bundle to be securely tied with biodegradablenatural fiber twine. Securing with plastic or wire is prohibited. Yard-waste (also known as "landscape waste") shall mean grass clippings, leaves, branches and brush, other yard and garden trimmings, vines, garden plants and flowers, weeds, tree droppings (for example: pine cones and crabapples), and other similar organic 17 waste materials accumulated as the result of the cultivation and maintenance of lawns, shrubbery, vines, trees and gardens. Sod, dirt, Christmas trees, and greenery from wreathes and garlands shall not be considered yard-waste and shall be disposed of as refuse, unless the composting facility will accept it. 34. DESCRIPTION OF THE BASE SOLID WASTE PROGRAM 34. 1 Refuse, yard-waste, and curbside recycling services are provided to residences located within the City or Village on a once-per-week basis. 34.2 Yorkville Option A and B - The Yorkville options, being a modified volume based program, based on a monthly fee for pickup of all refuse, consisting of one 33-gallon, 64- gallon tote, or 96-gallon tote, and a $ 1 charge for each refuse disposal unit beyond the tote, unlimited yard waste and unlimited recycling. As part of program, the contractor shall supply the customer with a tote of a size of the customer' s choosing for a cost outlined in Appendix 1 . 34.3 Oswego refuse programs — The Village will select one of three solid waste programs. Haulers should bid on each of the following programs as set out below, in Appendix NUMBER. Oswego Option A — Unlimited refuse, unlimited recycling, and limited yard-waste collection. Refuse and recycling shall be collected if it is set out in a thirty- three (33) gallon or less container. A discounted rate schedule for senior residents within the VILLAGE limits will be offered by the CONTRACTOR; to residents age sixty-five (65) and over. Oswego Option B — Modified volume based program, with limited refuse, unlimited recycling, and limited yard-waste collection. Refuse limits per week are two (2) thirty-three (33) gallon disposal units or a CONTRACTOR issued sixty-five (65) gallon toter. The price to the customer for the optional 65-gallon toter shall be outlined in Appendix NUMBER. Each additional disposal unit shall be affixed with a $ 1 sticker. A discounted rate schedule for senior residents within the VILLAGE limits will be offered by the CONTRACTOR; to residents age sixty-five (65) and over. Oswego Option C - Modified volume based program, based on a monthly fee for pickup of all refuse, consisting of one 33 -gallon, 64-gallon tote, or 96- gallon tote, and a $ 1 charge for each refuse disposal unit beyond the tote, limited yard waste and unlimited recycling. As part of program, the contractor shall supply the customer with a tote of a size of the customer' s choosing for a cost outlined in Appendix NUMBER. A discounted rate schedule for senior residents within the VILLAGE limits will be offered by the CONTRACTOR; to residents age sixty-five (65) and over. 34.4 Bulk items as herein defined, are considered subject to collection by the CONTRACTOR, according to the terms and definitions of this contract. Residents with additional material or home improvement projects may contract separately with the CONTRACTOR. The CONTRACTOR will make available 6, 10, 15, 20, and 30 cubic yard containers for this purpose. Yorkville Option A and B - Yorkville's bulk item collection shall be for the collection of one ( 1 ) bulk item per week from residential units at no 18 additional cost to the resident. Oswego Option A, B, and C - Individual residents will be responsible for contacting the CONTRACTOR to make payment and logistics arrangements for the collection of bulk items, excluding the two (2) amnesty days as described in Section 44. 1 . 34. 5 Yard-waste collection shall begin each year on the I " collection day in April and end the last collection day in November. 35, SCOPE OF WORK 35 . 1 The Contractor shall be responsible for performing all work as outlined in the specifications herein and shall provide and furnish all labor, materials, equipment and supplies, vehicles, transportation services, and landfill and compost facility space required to perform and complete the collection and disposal of refuse and yard waste. The Contractor shall also make necessary arrangements with processors required to perform and complete the collection and marketing of recyclables. 35 .2 The collection of refuse, yard waste, and recyclable materials shall be a joint program awarded to one firm and cannot be quoted or operated as separate programs. 36. COLLECTION UNITS 36. 1 The base unit of service shall be known as a "Collection Unit or Stop". The Contractor shall collect, remove and dispose from every residential building unit, as defined herein, in the City of Yorkville, all refuse, yard-waste and curbside recyclables that may be set out for collection one ( 1 ) time each week. 37. GARBAGE AND REFUSE COLLECTION; PREPARATION AND PLACEMENT OF DISPOSAL UNITS 37. 1 Toter or can production: Yorkville Option A and B, and Oswego Option C - The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide, at its own expense, one 33-gallon, 64-gallon, or 96-gallon totes to each single-family residence in the City or Village for the purposes of garbage collection. The carts will remain the property of the CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTOR will be responsible for replacement of carts that become worn or damaged through normal usage. Oswego Option A - All refuse containers (totes, cans, etc.) shall be provided by the customer, at the customer' s cost Oswego Option B — All refuse containers (totes, cans, etc.) shall be provided by the customer, at the customer' s cost 37.2 All GARBAGE and REFUSE as herein defined that is designated for collection and disposal hereunder must be placed in one of the following containers : 1 ) the provided totes 2) a water-tight metal or plastic reusable waste container no larger than thirty-three (3 3) gallons in capacity and no smaller than fifteen (15) gallons in capacity 3) a heavy duty bag no more than 33-gallons in capacity and less than 50 pounds in weight, which is securely fastened 19 37.3 Cans, containers, and/or heavy duty bags must be placed at the curb or roadway or in the alley (if designed by the CONTRACTOR). 37.4 All residences receiving the aforementioned services shall be required to prepare all materials for collection and/or disposal into proper "disposal units" . The CONTRACTOR will be required to collect only properly prepared disposal units. 37. 5 For modified volume-based programs (Yorkville Option A and B, Oswego Option B and C) Residents will be allowed to place unlimited amounts of disposal units at the curb for collection and disposal provided that a disposal sticker has been attached to each unit above and beyond the disposal units covered in the monthly fee. 37.6 Properly prepared refuse shall be placed as close to the roadway as practicable without interfering with or endangering the movement of vehicles or pedestrians or snow plowing operations. The CONTRACTOR shall return all containers at each pick-up location to the curbside or adjacent to the right-of-way of paved or traveled City or Village roadways. Containers will be placed, not thrown, and securely placed in such a manner that they are not left lying on their sides or in a manner that would allow roadway interference of vehicle and/or pedestrian traffic. Any contents spilled by CONTRACTOR on the parkways, premises, or streets are to be cleaned up in a workmanlike manner. 38. ACCEPTABLE/UNACCEPTABLE MATERIAL 38 . 1 . UNACCEPTABLE MATERIAL: Residents shall not set out for disposal and the CONTRACTOR shall refuse to accept for regular collection: hazardous waste materials, radioactive materials, poisons, liquid waste, paint or similar products, acids, used motor oils, or any other material that the CONTRACTOR is legally unable to accept. 38 .2 ACCEPTABLE MATERIAL: All refuse normally produced by residential properties shall be accepted for regular collection including but not necessarily limited to: bulk items, household fixtures, appliances, furniture and yard-waste. 39. EXAMINATION OF SERVICE AREA 39. 1 It is the responsibility of the Contractor to be completely informed of all conditions under which service is to be performed, the service area, and all other relevant matters pertaining to the collection services as specified herein, including, but not limited to, type of housing, population density, roads, traffic patterns, required collection procedure, labor requirements, and any other factor which would effect the execution and/or completion of the work covered by the contract. 40. ALTERNATIVES AND DEVIATIONS 40. 1 The specifications included in this package describe existing services which the City and Village believes are necessary to meet performance requirements of the City and Village and shall be considered the minimum standards expected of the Contractor. 40.2 Other alternatives from the specifications in Section III may be indicated if the proposed alternatives are equal to or greater than what is required by these specifications. All alternatives shall be separately listed, and a justification for each shall be stated. The Contractor shall use Appendix 3 , Schedule of Alternatives and Deviations, for listing other alternatives. 20 40.3 If the Contractor is unable to meet any of the specifications as outlined herein, it shall also separately list all requested deviations from the specifications, with justifications attached for each deviation. The Contractor shall use Appendix 3 , Schedule of Alternatives and Deviations, for listing proposed deviations. 40.4 If the Contractor does not indicate alternatives to or deviations from the specifications, the City and Village shall assume it is able to fully comply with these specifications. The City and Village, individually, shall be the sole and final judge of compliance with all specifications. 40.5 The City and Village, individually, further reserves the right to determine the acceptability or unacceptability of any and all alternatives or deviations The City and Village, individually, shall also be the sole and final judge as to whether any alternative or deviation is of an equivalent or better quality of service. 41 CHRISTMAS TREE COLLECTION 41 . 1 The CONTRACTOR will provide curbside collection service of live Christmas trees two (2) weeks during the Istand 2nd full week in January each contract year. It will be the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR to either recycle or correctly dispose of live Christmas trees. There will be no cost to the City and Village for this service. The CONTRACTOR and the City and Village will work together to educate the public with respect to the condition of the trees before they will be collected. Christmas trees will be accepted provided they are free of all ornamentation, including tinsel, garland and lights. If disposable tree bags are used, a refuse sticker must be affixed to the plastic bag. Christmas trees placed at the curb during the two-week special collection period shall be recycled. Recycling shall consist of taking the Christmas trees to a compost site to be chipped, mulched or composted. The CONTRACTOR shall provide the name and location of the compost site in accordance with Appendix 6. 42, YARD-WASTE/BUNDLED BRUSH COLLECTION 42. 1 Yard-waste collection programs Yorkville Option A and B - As a part of yard-waste collection, all eligible households located within the City' s corporate boundaries shall be provided weekly yard-waste and bundled brush collection in an unlimited amount. All yard waste materials must be placed in "Kraft" paper bags designed and sold specifically for the collection and disposal of yard waste. All bundled brush must not exceed four (4) foot length, with each individual bundle not to exceed excess weight of fifty (50) pounds. Resident customers placing bundled brush out for collection will be required to bundle brush with biodegradable natural fiber twine (plastic or wire is prohibited). Bundled brush will be collected on regular refuse service days during the yearly period of time established, (April 1 st through the last collection day in November). Oswego Option A, B and C - As a part of yard-waste collection, all eligible households located within the VILLAGE's corporate boundaries shall be provided weekly yard-waste and bundled brush collection. All yard waste materials must be placed in "Kraft" paper bags designed and sold specifically for the collection and disposal of yard waste. Each "Kraft" paper bag will have a yard waste sticker attached prior to collection. All bundled brush must not exceed four (4) foot length, with each individual 21 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego bundle not to exceed excess weight of fifty (50) pounds. Resident customers placing bundled brush out for collection will be required to bundle brush with biodegradable natural fiber twine (plastic or wire is prohibited). Each bundled brush will have a yard waste sticker attached prior to collection. Yard-waste and Bundled brush will be collected on regular refuse service days during the yearly period of time established, (April 1 st through the last collection day in November). There will be two (2) amnesty days in a calendar year as described in Section 44. 1 of this contract when unlimited yard waste and bundled brush will be collected at no charge to resident. 43. RECYCLABLE MATERIAL PROGRAM 43 . 1 The CONTRACTOR agrees to provide, at its own expense, one 33-gallon, 64-gallon, or 96-gallon tote to each single-family residence in the City and Village for the purposes of recycling collection. The carts will remain the property of the CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTOR will be responsible for replacement of carts that become worn or damaged through normal usage. 43 .2 The City' s and Village's recyclable material program shall remain voluntary on the part of any person receiving residential scavenger service as covered under this contract. The Contractor shall, however, provide for the collection and disposal of all recyclable material placed for collection in accordance with the terms of this Contract. The Contractor shall provide for the collection and disposal of recyclable material at no additional cost to customers receiving residential scavenger service as covered under this contract. The cost of recycling collection and disposal services has been built into the rates and charges otherwise provided for in the Contract for collection of refuse and yard- waste. 43 .3 Revenue collected from the sale of recyclable materials shall be handled in the following manner: Yorkville Option A — All revenue collected from the sale of recyclable material shall be the property of the Contractor. Yorkville Option B — All revenue collected from the sale of recyclable material shall be the property of the City. Oswego Options A, B and C - All revenue from fair market value actual residential recycle commodity rebates after fees (handling, transport, residual, moisture); for the first two hundred (200) tons each month collected by the CONTRACTOR within the VILLAGE of Oswego will be retained by the CONTRACTOR. All actual gross revenue rebates above two hundred (200) tons a month collected on an annual average will be split between the VILLAGE and the CONTRACTOR at a rate of fifty percent (50%) throughout the term of the contract. The CONTRACTOR shall have representatives available to participate in community-sponsored events promoting environmental awareness. 22 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego 43 . 4 The Contractor shall have representatives available to participate in community- sponsored events promoting environmental awareness. 43 . 5 The method in which the recyclables are to be generally sorted for collection by the household shall be commingled within the recycling container(s). 43 .6 The Contractor shall specify the manner in which the recyclables are to be collected and sorted by the Contractor at the curbside; i.e. curb-sort, sorting at an intermediate processing facility, and the like. The Contractor will be responsible for cleaning up any material that has spilled as a result of the collection process. 43 .7 The Contractor shall allow for a tagging system for recyclables not collected and must provide a simple explanation as to why the recyclable material(s) were not picked up, including, but not limited to, the following: contaminants, improper preparation; materials not accepted in program: refuse and/or yard-waste mixed with recyclables; or some combination thereof. The Contractor shall submit an example of the tagging system to be used. Recyclable materials that were rejected shall be returned to the container and not left on the street or parkway areas. 43 . 8 The Contractor shall purchase and maintain a reasonable supply of recycling totes, for residential scavenger service to cover replacement for lost, damaged and stolen containers, and for customers desiring additional recycling capacity. The City and Village, individually, reserves the right to approve the type of containers purchased by the Contractor. 43 .9 The Contractor shall pick up all recyclable material placed in the recycling totes, the recycling containers supplied by the Contractor, or any other recycling containers used by the customer. If, for operational purposes, the Contractor has difficulty identifying recycling containers used for recycling purposes, the Contractor shall provide free of charge, a recycling sticker or other identification mechanism to be placed on the various recycling containers used for collection of recyclable material. 43 . 10 The Contractor shall provide the name and location of the processing facility, as well as the proposed buyer/market for recyclable materials as set forth in Appendix 6. In the event that an alternative site is preferred by the City or Village, the Contractor shall use the alternative site location provided that any changes in the costs for collection and processing created by the use of such site will be negotiated between the City or Village and the Contractor prior to its use. 43 . 11 The City and the Village, individually, reserves the right to accept or reject any or all suggested categories, which may be offered for collection in the residential recycling program. The City and the Village, individually, also reserves the right to phase in at a later date, any material(s) which the Contractor has indicated an ability to collect but which the City or the Village has determined not to add to the collection program, or to phase in any material(s) that the Contractor may not presently offer but will be able to offer sometime during the term of the Contract. The basis for determining cost of adding 23 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego materials at a later date will be based on evidence supplied by the Contractor specifically justifying additional cost due to collection, administration, profit, and processing (minus revenue) only. 44. AMNESTY DAY 44. 1 The CONTRACTOR shall provide for a spring and fall curbside collection of additional refuse, yard-waste and bulk items as defined herein, on a date(s) that is mutually agreed upon between the CONTRACTOR and the CITY and the Village, individually. In addition, the CONTRACTOR will collect WHITE GOODS and up to 4 automobile tires during the scheduled Amnesty Day. All rims must be removed from the tires prior to collection. There shall be no additional charge to the residents for the clean up and additional BULK ITEMS and WHITE GOODS that will be accepted during the designated clean-up week and stickers will not be required. 45. COLLECTION FROM MUNICIPAL FACILITIES 45 . 1 At no additional cost, the Contractor shall collect, transport, and dispose of all refuse, yard-waste and recyclables from all municipal-owned facilities as set forth in Exhibit B. The Contractor shall furnish, at no additional cost to the City or the Village, at each municipal building served, containers for refuse, yard-waste and recyclables as requested by the municipality' s Designated Representative, with the size to be agreed upon. The City and the Village reserves the right to request such containers, in addition to, or increase the size of normal containers, on a permanent or temporary basis. If requested by the City or the Village, any and all containers furnished by the Contractor shall be equipped with non-removable hinged covers or lids. Collection and disposal services by the Contractor will be as often as necessary each week, as set forth in Exhibit B. 46, STICKER DESIGN AND DISTRIBUTION 46. 1 The CITY and the Village, individually, have the sole authority to approve or disapprove the design and construction of the CONTRACTOR's stickers. Stickers must be of an approved color, which should be clearly visible at dawn or at dusk by drivers, and which said color should be changed periodically to prevent counterfeiting. The paper used shall be biodegradable and shall contain glue backing that will adhere in sub-zero temperatures as well as in extreme heat. The stickers shall contain the CONTRACTOR's name and telephone number, state the name of the municipality and be consecutively numbered for record keeping and balancing purposes. The CONTRACTOR will deliver stickers to retail outlets and the CITY or Village upon request. 46.2 The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for the printing, distribution, and sale of an ample and always available supply of waste stickers. The CONTRACTOR shall arrange for local retail outlets to aid in the sale of the stickers. The CITY and Village also may act as a disposal sticker retailer for the CONTRACTOR. 47. [Section purposefully omitted] 48. BILLING PROCEDURES 48. 1 The CONTRACTOR shall bill the City or Village individually for all serviced UNITS 24 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego within the respective municipality. The City and the Village, individually, shall provide the contractor with the number of occupied UNITS within the municipality on a monthly basis. 49. MONTHLY REPORTING 49. 1 The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the City and the Village a monthly refuse, yard-waste and recycling material report, due by the 25`x' of the following month. The report shall include the following information for all residential scavenger service in each municipality covered under this contract: 49.2 Refuse - Total weight in tons and total volume in compacted cubic yards of refuse land- filled each month; Number of white goods collected each month; Tipping fee charge per ton at the landfill site; Name and location of the landfill facility and/or transfer station used by the Contractor; and, Copy of all complaints filed by the City and Village customers during the month. 49.3 Yard-waste - Total volume, in compacted cubic yards, of yard-waste collected; Tipping fee charge per compacted cubic yard at the compost facility; Name and location of the compost facility used by the Contractor; and, Copy of all complaints filed by the City and Village customers during the month. 49.4 Recyclable Material - Weekly set-out rate; Monthly participation rate (total number of set-outs divided by the number of homes/dwelling units included in the collection service); Total weight, in pounds, of recyclable materials collected; Revenue received by the Contractor for the sale of recyclables; Tipping fee savings (total weight of recyclable materials collected in tons multiplied by the tipping fee charge per ton at the landfill site); Name and location of processing facility used by the Contractor; and, Copy of all complaints filed by the City and Village customers during the month. 50. CONSUMER EDUCATION 50. 1 Upon request, the Contractor agrees to provide City and Village residents with such educational materials as the City and Village, individually, deems necessary. Educational materials may include notices to be left at resident' s property as well as literature describing in detail the refuse, recycling and yard-waste collection program. There shall be no cost to the City or the Village or its residents for the printing and distribution of any consumer education materials. 51 . TITLE TO WASTES 51 . 1 All refuse, yard-waste, and curbside recyclables collected shall belong to the Contractor as soon as the same is placed in the Contractor' s vehicle. 52. DISPOSAL 52. 1 All refuse and yard-waste collected shall be removed from the City and Village by the Contractor as soon as it has been collected; but in any event, not later than noon of the date following collection, and shall not be disposed of in violation of any state, federal or county laws or regulations. 25 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego 53, RATES AND SPECIAL RATES 53 . 1 For any services required to be performed under this Contract, the charge shall not exceed the rates as fixed by the Contract and set forth in Appendix 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof. For items not otherwise provided for by the Contract document, and requiring special handling due to size, weight, type of material or method of placement, the charges are to be negotiated between the Contractor and the resident customer for collection and disposal into a landfill or processing facility. 54. SPECIAL & EMERGENCY COLLECTIONS 54. 1 The Contractor shall offer special curbside collection service for large quantities of refuse including, but not limited to, construction and demolition debris, and move-in or move- out clean-up rubbish. Such services shall be an advance arrangement with the Contractor at the resident customer request. The collection cost for such services shall be based upon cubic yards and the resident customer shall make payment directly to the Contractor. The Contractor agrees to provide free dumpsters (sizes 1 yard through 30 yard as requested by the City and Village) for refuse and recycling collection during the City' s annual Hometown Days, 4°i of July Parade and celebration in the park, and other City or Village managed special events. . The City or Village and the Contractor may mutually agree to emergency pick-up services for disasters including, but not limited to, flood, wind and snow. 55. SCHEDULE AND TIME OF COLLECTIONS 55 . 1 The City and Village shall be divided into collection areas and a regular weekday collection shall be assigned to each area. A map of the City and the Village , designating collection areas shall be made a part of this contract and attached hereto as Exhibit A. 55 .2 The schedule shall not be changed without first obtaining consent from the City Administrator, or Village Administrator, and not without giving a minimum of thirty (30) days written notice to all parties affected by the change. The City or Village may, at its discretion, waive the minimum time limits required. This waiver must be in writing and signed by the City or Village designee. The Contractor will be required to publish an advertisement twice per week in two separate weekly issues of the local newspapers, no earlier than 60 days prior to the change, with the last advertisement to be no later than fifteen ( 15) days prior to the schedule change. Failure of the Contractor to maintain said collection schedule shall be considered a breach and default of the contract and grounds for immediate termination of the contract. 55 .3 In no case shall collection commence prior to 6:00 a.m. or continue past 7 :00 p.m. on any day during the term of the contract. The collection schedule shall not include Saturday or Sunday as a regular collection day for any area in the City. 56, HOLIDAYS 56. 1 Collection normally falling on the following holidays may be rescheduled for the first working day following the legal holiday, or on Saturday, as necessary, for that week only: 26 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego New Year' s Day Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Thanksgiving Day Christmas Day 56.2 The Contractor agrees to inform the City and its residents of changes in normal collections due to holidays by notification through at least two local media outlets or establish a permanent holiday schedule or plan to be printed within the refuse literature. 57. SCHEDULE ADHERANCE 57. 1 If, at any time during the term of this contract, the Contractor shall collect any section of the City or the Village on a day other than the scheduled day, the Contractor shall immediately notify the respective municipality that he is in violation of the contract. If a similar violation should occur more than once within the three week period following the week of the original violation, the City or the Village will notify the Contractor by certified mail and withhold any further payment that may be due under the contract until the Contractor has furnished evidence satisfactory to the City or the Village that the Contractor has taken necessary actions and precautions to prevent further violations. The City or Village may determine that this second or subsequent collection violation as a breach of contract, and therefore the City and the Village reserves the right to terminate the contract. Delays that are occasioned by holidays, or by daily (any 24-hour period) precipitation of four (4) inches or more of rain, or eight (8) inches or more of snow, may not be considered as violations. The City Administrator, Village Administrator or the shall be the judge of whether delays constitute a violation, or not. 58. PLACE OF PICK-UP 58. 1 The Contractor is responsible for the public streets, or properly wavered private street curbside pick-up of all residential locations as well as designated locations as requested by the City or Village. 59. REPLACEMENT DAMAGE 59. 1 The Contractor is responsible for damages resulting from its careless handling of any receptacle. The Contractor at no extra charge to the user shall replace all containers, which suffer damage caused by the Contractor. If the original container was supplied by the CONTRACTOR, the containers so supplied shall remain the property of the CONTRACTOR. If the original container was supplied by the resident, then the replacement container shall be the property of the resident. 60. COLLECTION VEHICLES 60. 1 All vehicles used for collection purposes, except those exempted by other provisions of these specifications, shall have fully enclosed bodies with self-contained mechanisms to load and compress the material collected. These vehicles must be modern, neat, rear, front, or side-loading packer-type motor trucks, have entry for refuse into the vehicle' s collecting body. All vehicles shall be kept watertight to prevent leaking, shall be kept closed except during collections along collection route. All equipment used by the Contractor shall be painted with no rust showing on the cab, chassis or body. Vehicles must be kept in clean, sanitary and quiet operating condition. Vehicles must at all times 27 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego be supplied with brooms and necessary items to provide for immediate clean up of any litter or mess, which may result from leaking, spilling or blowing during collection procedures. Vehicles shall be clearly labeled with the firm' s name, address, and telephone number and have a vehicle identification number printed clearly on each and every vehicle. However, if the Contractor desires to use a vehicle of larger capacity, specific written approval of the specific vehicle shall be required from the City' s or the Village' s Designated Representative, after an actual demonstration of the vehicle on the streets of the respective municipality. Overweight vehicles are the responsibility of the Contractor. Contractor is required to comply with weight requirements and safety requirements as established by Illinois Law or City or Village Ordinances for vehicles, vehicle operators and specialty equipment. 61. EMPLOYEES 61 . 1 The Contractor shall undertake to perform all disposal services rendered in a neat, orderly and efficient manner; to use care and diligence in the performance of this contract; and to provide neat, orderly and courteous personnel on its crews. The Contractor shall agree to prohibit any drinking of alcoholic beverages or use of illegal drugs or drugs which impair the ability of the employee or agent to safely and adequately perform his or her (drivers and crew members) job while on duty or in the course of performing their duties under this contract. The Contractor shall also agree to ensure that each employee driving a vehicle shall at all times carry a valid operator's license for the type vehicle he/she is driving. The Contractor's employees will be attired, at all times, in a professional-type manner. These specifics will be agreed upon between representatives from the Contractor and the City or Village Designated Representative. 62, ACCIDENT PREVENTION 62. 1 Precaution shall be exercised at all times for the citizens, employees and property. The safety provisions of all applicable laws and building and construction codes shall be observed. Machinery, equipment and all hazards shall be guarded or eliminated in accordance with the safety provisions of the manual of Accident Prevention in Construction, published by the Associated General Contractors of America, to the extent that such provisions are not in contravention of applicable law. 63. COMPLAINT PROCEDURE 63 . 1 All complaints received by the Contractor shall be given prompt and courteous attention. The City and the Village, individually and the Contractor will agree upon a formalized complaint form to be filled out by the Contractor each and every time a customer contacts the Contractor with a complaint. It will be the Contractor's responsibility to have the complaint forms, on NCR (no carbon required) paper, printed and available for use by the Contractor prior to the commencement of this Contract. The Contractor will supply the City and the Village with sufficient NCR forms for logging of complaints by City and Village staff. Any complaint received by the City or the Village shall be immediately communicated to the contractor. The Contractor is required to supply the City with copies of all complaint forms within five (5) business days of a complaint being made, indicating thereon the resolution thereof 28 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego 63 .2 The Contractor shall provide the City and the Village with name, phone number, and email address for an individual to serve as point person for purposes of City staff contact with the Contractor. 64, COMPLAINTS 64. 1 Where any dispute arises between a resident/customer and the Contractor, as to the manner or placing of containers for collection or preparation of recyclable materials, or the nature of the Contract or the like, the Contractor agrees that in the specific instance collection will be immediately made even though in its opinion, the customer is in error; and that it will immediately report the same to the City's or the Village's Designated Representative so that the City or the Village and the Contractor may resolve the dispute, if possible, before additional collection becomes necessary. The intent of this paragraph is to avoid disputes/disagreements between the customers and the Contractor' s employees, and to permit disputes/disagreements to be handled by mutual discussion between the Contractor and the City or the Village. If a missed pick up is reported by the City or a customer to the Contractor, the Contractor shall collect the refuse, recyclable material or yard-waste from such customer within on (1 ) business day of notification. All complaints other than missed pickups shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the City or the Village within two (2) business days. As noted above, the Contractor shall supply to the City and the Village an NCR copy of the complaint form for each and every complaint and on which the nature of the complaint and the disposition is clearly noted. The Contractor shall cooperate with the City and the Village in minimizing complaints from customers. Continued unreasonable complaint levels, as determined by the City or the Village, or failure of the Contractor to carry out any of its contractual obligations such as, but not limited to, rude treatment, messy pickups, damage to persons or property and early start-up may be due cause for the City or the Village to terminate this Contract after notice and an opportunity to be heard. 65. CUSTOMER VIOLATIONS OF MUNICIPAL CODE 65 . 1 The Contractor shall have the right to notify any customer of noncompliance with the applicable Yorkville or Oswego code provisions concerning the handling or disposal of solid waste as those same may apply to such customers. The Contractor shall report any continuance of any such noncompliance to the respective City or Village. 66, NEW CUSTOMERS 66. 1 The Contractor agrees to provide service immediately to all new customers, even if the new customer neglected to first notify or request collection services. The City and Village agrees to make every effort possible to alert the new customer to the collection procedure for refuse, recycling and yard-waste. 67. EXCLUSIVE GRANT/INTENT 67. 1 The City and the Village, individually, agrees that in consideration of the faithful performance of the obligations herein undertaken by the Contractor, the City and Village does, by execution of this Contract pursuant to City Code, give and grant to the respective Contractor, for the term of this Contract only, the sole and exclusive Class A 29 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego License to collect and dispose of all residential solid wastes. The Contract shall include all residences (attached single-family and detached single-family as defined herein) and municipal facilities as required within the corporate boundaries of the City of Yorkville or the Village of Oswego. This grant expressly includes the right and duty to service any land annexed to the City or Village where new residences or municipal buildings have been constructed during the term of this Contract. Service will be provided on the same terms as set forth herein. The City and Village shall communicate any changes to the corporate boundaries or service area resulting from annexations, zoning actions, site plan approvals, construction, etc., to the Contractor. It is the intent of this Contract to obtain, throughout its term, clean, courteous, well scheduled, and well-executed collection and disposal or processing of refuse, recycling and yard-waste from properties in the City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego. While the City and Village recognize that any collection service involves minor customer operating problems, the intent of this Contract is to ensure that any such operating problems are minimized to the extent possible and corrected as soon as possible. 68. QUALIFICATIONS/REFERENCES 68. 1 The Contractor shall provide at least five (5) references of "like" public agencies with current contacts in accordance with Appendix 4 and shall indicate if appropriate, which municipality has implemented a volume-based program. Contractor shall complete the attached Appendix 6 listing its qualifications. 69. PROPOSAL SECURITY 69. 1 Each proposal shall be accompanied by proposal security, which shall be in the form of a certified check or a bank cashier's check in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000), made payable to the City of Yorkville, and ($5,000) made payable to the Village of Oswego. Proposals submitted without the required security shall be rejected. After formal written notification by the City or Village that a contract award decision has been made, the proposal security of the successful Contractor shall be forfeited to the City or Village in the event that the Contractor shall withdraw its proposal, or neglect or refuse to enter into a contract and required bond, and the Contractor shall be liable for any damages the City may thereby suffer. 69.2 Proposal securities shall be released as follows: (1 ) The successful Contractor's security shall be retained until the required performance bond ($500,000.00) has been furnished; (2) Proposal securities of the proposing Contractors shall be held until the successful Contractor's performance bond has been furnished, at which time the checks will be promptly returned to the unsuccessful Contractors 70, TERM OF CONTRACT 70. 1 Yorkville program - The term of the Contract will be four (4) years and nine (9) months years, and shall commence at 12 :01 a.m. on August 1 , 2012 and shall remain in full force and effect through termination at 11 :59 p.m. on April 30, 2017 . Upon request, the City may exercise an option to extend the contract term for an additional two (2) year period ending at 11 :59 p.m. on April 30, 2019. The Contractor may negotiate in good faith, on request of the City, for an extension to the contract, provided that the contract extension 30 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego is approved by the City Council no later than one hundred twenty ( 120) days before the termination of the existing contract. Oswego Options A, B, and C — For all Oswego Options, the Village desires quotes on two different Contract terms. The first desired quote for Contract term will be for two (2) years and nine (9) months, and shall commence at 12 :01 a.m. on August 1 , 2012 and shall remain in full force and effect through termination at 11 : 59 p.m. on April 30, 2015 . The second desired quote Contract term will be for four (4) years and nine (9) months, and shall commence at 12:01 a.m. on August 1 , 2012 and shall remain in full force and effect through termination at 11 :59 p.m. on April 30, 2017. The Village shall choose the length of the Contract term upon acceptance of a proposer. 71 . STICKER REFUND 71 . 1 At the end of the Contract term, should the City or the Village select a different scavenger service, the Contractor agrees to refund to all customers, retailers and the City and Village, the full purchase price of all refuse/yard-waste stickers returned to the Contractor within one hundred twenty ( 120) days after the end of such term. 72. PERFORMANCE BOND 72. 1 The Contractor shall provide a performance bond issued by a surety in an amount of $500,000 to each of the the City and the Village. 73, EMERGENCIES 73 . 1 The Contractor agrees that should any emergency arise by reason of storm, tornadoes, or other act of God which require additional hauling equipment by the City or the Village, the Contractor' s equipment shall be placed at the disposal of the City or Village upon request for such temporary use, provided that upon such use the City or the Village shall pay the operating cost of such equipment and labor as it is used. The City and the Village, individually, reserves the right to direct which disposal sites are to be used during an emergency. 74 LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS 74. 1 The City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego reserves the right to construct any improvement or to permit any construction in any street, which may have the effect for a time of preventing the Contractor from traveling his accustomed route or routes for collection. The Contractor shall, however, by an acceptable method, continue to collect the refuse, yard-waste and recyclables to the same extent as though no interference existed upon the streets formerly traveled. This shall be done without extra cost to the City of Yorkville or the Village of Oswego. 75, TAXES, LICENSES & PERMITS 75. 1 The Contractor shall pay all sales, use, property, income, and other taxes that are lawfully assessed against the City, Village or the Contractor in connection with the Contractor' s facilities and the work included in this Contract, and shall obtain and pay for all licenses, permits, certificates of authority, and inspections required for the work. The Contractor shall furnish to the City and the Village satisfactory evidence that it has all permits, 31 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego licenses, and certificates of authority required to operate for the term of this contract. 76. DEFAULT 76. 1 If the Contractor fails to observe the established schedule for more than two (2) consecutive working days, and in the opinion of the City' s or Village' s Designated Representative, there has not been sufficient cause to justify such lack of observance, the City or the Village, respectively, shall serve notice, either personally or by affixing such notice to the local premises of the Contractor, that this contract shall be in default if the Contractor does not take action to re-establish the schedule within twenty-four (24) hours of said notice. If at the end of the twenty-four (24) hour period, the Contractor has not made the necessary corrections, the City or the Village shall take such steps as are necessary, to provide services according to the collection schedule submitted by the Contractor. The Contractor will be liable for any costs of such steps from the date of the notice of default. If deemed necessary by the City' s or Village's Designated Representative, the City or the Village shall have the right to take over all equipment and facilities of the Contractor for a period of up to one-hundred-twenty ( 120) days from the date of notice of default. 77. STRIKES/FORCE MAJEURE 77. 1 The Contractor shall be required to file proof with the City Administrator and Village Administrator, or their designee that it has a "no strike" provision for the duration of all collective bargaining agreements with its workers. Upon execution of any new agreement, the Contractor shall forward to the City Administrator and Village Administrator within thirty (30) days thereafter, proof that said agreement also contains a "no strike" clause. 78 .2 In the event that the Contractor shall fail to collect, remove and properly dispose of the waste in accordance with the terms of this contract, for a period of five (5) business days or more, the CITY or Village, may, at its option, cause such waste to be collected and disposed of by any reasonable means available to the CITY or the Village, and the cost thereof may be charged against the Contractor and the performance bond furnished by the Contractor. The foregoing option shall not be available to the CITY or the Village if the Contractor's failure so to collect and remove waste for the period was due to unusual weather conditions, or some other "act of God," which rendered such collection and removal impossible to perform. The Contractor shall not be liable for the failure to perform its duties if such failure was caused by a catastrophe, riot, war, government order or regulation, fire, accident or any similar contingency beyond the reasonable control of the Contractor. "Act of God" does not include any strike, sympathy strike, slowdown, sit-down, stoppage of work, refusal to perform overtime, mass absenteeism, refusal to cross a picket line or any other similar concerted action or intentional interruption or disruption of the operations of the Contractor by Contractor's own employees (the foregoing collectively referred to as " labor dispute"), provided, however, that in the event that the CITY or the Village exercises its option under this Article to collect and dispose of waste by other reasonable means because of the Contractor's failure to perform due to a labor dispute, the total amount charged against the Contractor by the CITY or Village can only be an amount which is in excess of the total amount that the CITY or Village would have otherwise paid to the Contractor for collection over the duration of the labor dispute. The CONTRACTOR shall promptly notify the CITY and Village in writing of any 32 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego event covered by this Section and the date, nature and cause thereof. Such notice shall indicate the anticipated extent of such delay and the obligations under this Agreement to be affected thereby 33 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego We PROPOSAL/CONTRACT FORM * * *THIS PROPOSAL, WHEN ACCEPTED AND SIGNED BY AN AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY OF THE CITY OF YORKVILLE, SHALL BECOME A CONTRACT BINDING UPON BOTH PARTIES. Entire Block Must Be Completed When A Submitted Bid Is To Be Considered For Award PROPOSER: Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest , LLC Date: 04 / 09 / 11 Company Name 1660 Hubbard Avenue , lst Floor Email Address Street Address of Company Bob Pfister Batavia , Illinois 60510 Contact Name (Print) City, State, Zip ( 630 ) 587 - 8282 24-Hour Telephone Business Phone v/ ( 630 ) 761 - 3105 Sign tueof ficer, Partner or Fax Sole Pr prie r James M . Rooney Print Name & Title ATTEST: If a Corporation Regional Vice President Signature Municipal Marketing Mgr . CITY OF YORKVILLE or VILLAGE OF OSWEGO: ATTEST: Authorized Signature Signature of City/Village Clerk Title Date Date In compliance with the specifications, the above-signed offers and agrees, if this Proposal is accepted within 90 calendar days from the date of opening, to furnish any or all of the services upon which prices are quoted, at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point within the time specified above. 34 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego VENDOR W-9 REQUEST FORM The law requires that we maintain accurate taxpayer identification numbers for all individuals and partnerships to whom we make payments, because we are required to report to the I.R.S . all payments of $600 or more annually. We also follow the I.R. S . recommendation that this information be maintained for all payees including corporations. Please complete the following substitute W-9 letter to assist us in meeting our I.R.S . reporting requirements. The information below will be used to determine whether we are required to send you a Form 1099. Please respond as soon as possible, as failure to do so will delay our payments. BUSINESS (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) : NAME: Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest , LLC ADDRESS: 1660 Hubbard Avenue . 1st Floor Crrv: Batavia :: Illinois 60510 STATE: Illinois ZIT: 60510 PRONE: ( 630 ) 587 - 8282 FAX: ( 630 ) 761 - 3105 TAX ID #('TIN): 76 - 0839612 (If you are supplying a social security number, please give your full name) REMIT TO ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE): NAME: Same ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: zip: TYPE OF ENTITY (CIRCLE ONE): *Individual ._Sala etol empl r •Government Agency •LLP (Limited Liability Partnership) LLC (Limited Liability Corporation) Medical 'Partnership •Chantable/Nonprfit *Incorporated •Other (Please describe) SIGNATURE: DATE: 04 / 9 11 35 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION (page I of 3) Solid Waste Collection Veolia ES Solid Waste With regard to RFP proposer Midwest , LLC hereby certifies (Name of Project) (Name of Proposer) the following: I . Proposer is not barred from bidding this contract as a result of violations of Section 720 ILCS 5/33E-3 (Bid Rigging) or 720 ILCS 5/33E-4 (Bid-Rotating); 2 . Proposer certifies that it has a written sexual harassment policy in place and is in fill compliance with 775 ILCS § 12- 105 (A)(4); 3 . Proposer certifies that not less than the prevailing rate of wages as determined by the City of Yorkville or Village of Oswego, Kendall County or the Illinois Department of Labor shall be paid to all laborers, workers and mechanics performing work for the respective municipality. All bonds shall include a provision as will guarantee the faithful performance of such prevailing wage clause. Proposer agrees to comply with the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act, 820 ILCS 130/ 1 et seq. , for all work completed. Proposer agrees to pay the prevailing wage and require that all of its subcontractors pay prevailing wage to any laborers, workers or mechanics who perform work pursuant to this contract or related subcontract. Proposer and each subcontractor shall keep or cause to be kept an accurate record of names, occupations and actual wages paid to each laborer, workman and mechanic employed by the Proposer in connection with the contract. This record shall be sent to the City and Village on a monthly basis along with the invoice and shall be open to inspection at all reasonable hours by any representative of the City, Village, or the Illinois Department of Labor and must be preserved for four (4) years following completion of the contract. Proposer certifies that proposer and any subcontractors working on the project are aware that filing false payroll records is a class B misdemeanor and that the monetary penalties for violations are to be paid pursuant to law by the proposer, contractor and subcontractor. The City and the Village shall not be liable for any underpayments. If applicable: Since this is a contract for a fixed public works project, as defined in 820 ILCS 130/2, Contractor agrees to post at the job site in an easily accessible place, the prevailing wages for each craft or type of worker or mechanic needed to execute the contract or work to be performed. 4. Proposer certifies that it is in full compliance with the Federal Highway Administrative Rules on Controlled Substances and Alcohol Use and Testing, 49 C. F.R. Parts 40 and 382 and that all employee drivers are currently participating in a drug and alcohol testing program pursuant to the Rules. 5 . Proposer further certifies that it is not delinquent in the payment of any tax administered by the Department of Revenue, or that Proposer is contesting its liability for the tax delinquency or the amount of a tax delinquency in accordance with the procedures established by the appropriate Revenue Act. Proposer further certifies that if it owes any tax payment(s) to the Department of Revenue, Proposer has entered into an agreement with the Department of 36 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION (page 2 of 3) Revenue for the payment of all such taxes that are due, and Proposer is in compliance with the agreement. BY: &ioposer's James M . Rooney uthorized Agent 3 9 6 1 2 FEDERAL TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER or N /A Social Security Number Subscribed and sworn to before me UQ this day of �r20ILLINOiS:01/92/13 -C Notary Public) (Fill Out Applicable Paragraph Below) (a) Corporation The Proposer is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Wisconsin , which operates under the Legal name of Veolia ES Solid waste Midwest LLC and the full names of its Officers are as follows: President: James M . Long Secretary: Michael K . Slattery Treasurer: a hael B . Bruckert and it does ave a corporate seal . (In the event that this bid is executed by other than the President, attach hereto a certified copy of that section of Corporate By-Laws or other authorization by the Corporation which permits the person to execute the offer for the corporation.) (b) Partnership Signatures and Addresses of All Members of Partnership: N /A 37 VEOLIA ES SOLID WASTE MIDWEST LLC FEIN: 76-0839612 Business type: Limited liability company organized in Wisconsin on 10/ 18/06 IL Qualification: Qualified to do business in Illinois on 12/7/06 ; also does business in IL under registered dba of " Veolia Environmental Services " The company is a LLC with a sole member , Veolia ES Solid Waste of North America, LLC . Additional information on the sole member is shown below . Additionally , the company has the following officers , none of which holds any ownership interest in the company : Officers: President James M . Long Vice President & Treasurer Raphael B . Bruckert Vice President & Secretary Michael K . Slattery Vice President Michael Dougherty Vice President James M . Rooney Assistant Secretary Matthew C . Gunnelson Assistant Treasurer Henry P. Karius Sole Member: Veolia ES Solid Waste of North America, LLC , A LLC organized in Wisconsin (FEIN : 39- 1733405) Address : 125 S . 84"' Street, Suite 200 Milwaukee, WI 53214 Ph: 414-479-7800 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION (page 3 of 3) The partnership does business under the legal name of: which name is registered with the office of in the state of (c) Sole Proprietor The Supplier is a Sole Proprietor whose full name is: and if operating under a trade name, said trade name is: which name is registered with the office of in the state of 5. Are you willing to comply with the City's and Village's preceding insurance requirements within 13 days of the award of the contract? Insurer's Name Please attached Certificate of Insurance Agent Marsh USA Inc. Street Address Two Logan Square City, State, Zip Code Philadelphia, PA 19103-2797 Telephone Number I/We affirm that the above certifications are true and accurate and that I/we have read and understand them, Print Name of Company: Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest LLC Print Name and Title of Authorizing Signature: James M. Rooney –�j— Regional Vice President Signature: Date: 04/ 11 9 38 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego APPENDIX 1 GENERAL PRICE QUOTATION SHEET See attached spreadsheet 39 NW September 1. 2012 to May 1, 2013 to 11111W May 1, 2014 to may 1,2015 to plin DescrlotlOn'; r ' 33 gal. tote: $1730 33 gal tote $17,61 33 gal. tote: $18.14 33 gal tote $1869 33galtote: 51925 YOrkvAe Option A Only 65 Gal. tote: $17,10 65 gal. tote: $17.61 65 gal. tote: $18,14 65 gat tote: $1869 65 gal. tote: $1915 96 gal. tote: $17,10 96 gat tote: S17.61 96 gal. tote $18,14 96 gal. tote: $18,69 96 gal.tote: $1915 33 gal, tote: $1830 33 gal tote: $1885 33 gat tote: $19.41 33 gal. tote: 52000 33 gal tote: $2060 Yorkville Option B Only 65 gal. tote: $1830 65 gal, tote: 518.85 65 eat. tote: $1941 65 gat. tote: $2000 65gal.tote: $20.60 96 gal. tote: $1830 96 gal. tote: $18,85 96 gat tote: $19.41 96 gal. tote: $20,00 96gaLtme: 520.60 Oswego Option A Only NO BID Resident ....... Resident Resident: - N /A N /A N/A N/A 3year term Senior --- Senior: ----- Senior; --.__ N /A N/A N/A N/A 233 gal owner 233 gal owner: - 233 gal owner: - N /A N /A N/A N/A Oswego Option 8 only NO BID 65 gat contractor tote: ------ 65 gal. contractor tote: ---- 65 gal. contractor tote: ----- N /A N/A N/A N/A 3 year term 233 gal. owner. senior: ----- 2-33 gal. owner, senior ....... 2-33 gal. owner, senior: ----- N/A N/A N/A N/A 65 gat contractor tote, senior: ----- 65 gal. contractor tote, senior: ---- 65 gal. contractor tote, senior. ----- N/A N/A N/A N/A - 33 gal, tend. -- 33 gal tote: 33 gal.note: ....... N/A N/A N/A N/A 65 gal. tone: ------ 65 gal. tote: ---- 65 gal,tote: ----- N/A N/A N/A N/A Oswego Option C Only NO 81O 96 gal. tone: ----- 96 gal.tote: --- 96 gal. tote: ----- N/A N/A N/A N/A 3 year term 33 gal. tote,senior ---- 33 gal. tote, senior ------ 33 gal,tote, senior: ----- N/A N/A N/A N/A 65 gal. tote, senior: - - 65 gal. tote, senior ------ 65 gal tote, senior, ---- N/A N/A N/A N/A 96 gal. tote, senior: ------ 96 gat note, senior ------- 96 gal note, senior: N/A N/A N/A N/A Oswego Option A Only Resident: $1815 Residene $1880 Resident $1936 Resident: $1994 Resident: 52054 5 year term Senior resident $12.25 Senior resident: $17.77 Senior resident $1830 Senior resident $1885 Senior resident $1942 333 gal owner: $12.68 2-33 gal.owner: $1831 233 gal. owner: $18,76 2-33 gal. owner: $19.32 233 gal owner: $1990 Oswego Option 8 only 65 gal. contractor tone: $1768 65 gal. contractor tote: $18.21 65 gal. contractor tote: $18,76 65 gal.contractor tote: $1932 65 gal. contractor tone: $1990 5 year term 233 gal. owner, senior: $16.68 2-33 gal. ow $1738 2-33 gal. owner, senior: $17.70 2-33 gal. owner, senior: $1823 333 gal, owner. senior: $1817 ner, senior: a se ' 65 gat contractor tote, senior ----- 65 gat, contractor tote, senior: -- 65 gat contractor tote, senior: --- 65 gat contractor tote, senior --- 65 gal. contractor tote, senior: ....... 33 gal. tae 517.48 33 gal.tote: $18.00 33 gal, tote: $18.54 33 gal. tote: $19.10 33 gal. tone: 51967 65 gal. tote: $17.48 65 gal. tote: $1800 65 gal,tote: $1854 65 gal, tote: $1930 65 gal. tote: $19.67 Oswego Option C Only 96 gal. tote: $1748 96 gal. tote $1800 96 gal.tote: $1854 96 gal. tote: $19.10 96 gal, tote: 51967 5 year term 33 gal. tone, senior: 516.48 33 gat tote, senior: $16.97 33 gal. tote, senior: $17,48 33 gal.tote, senior: $1801 33 gal. tote, senior: 518.55 65 gat tote,senior: ------ 65 gat tote, senior --- 65 gal. tote, senior: ----- 65 gal.tote, senior: ....... 65 gal. tote, senior: ---- 96 gal. tote, senior: ---- 96gal. tone, senior: ---- 96 gal. tote, senior: ----- 96 gal,tote, senior: -- 96 gal. tote, senior: ....... September 1, 2012 to May 1, 2013 to qWF Mayl, 2014to MaY1, 2015to April 30, 2013 April 30, 2014 April 30, 2015 April 3G. 2016 Joint programs (same hauler, York 33 gal tote ----- York 33 gal tote ....... York 33 gal tote ----- YDrk33gal tote - - York 33 gal tote -- — YorlortleOptionAO-yeiand NO BID York 65 gal. tote: ....... York 65 gal tote: ----- York 65 gal. tote: ------ York 65 gal. tote: --- --- York 65 gal tote: -- - Oswego Option A, 3 year York 96 gal. tote: ----- York 96 gal. tote: ----- York 96 gal. tote: ------- York 96 gat tote: ....... YOrk96 gal tote: ------ Oevresident Osw resident --- Osw resident ----- N /A N /A N /A N /A Osw senior ....... Osw senior: ....... Dew senior N/A N /A N /A N /A York33 gal. tote: - -- York 33 gal tote: --- York 33 gal. tote: - - York 33 gal tote: --- York 33 gal tote ------ NOBID York 65 gal. tote: ....... York 65 gal. tote, ---- York 65 gal tote: -- York 65 gal, tote: ....... York 65 gal tote: --- Yorkville Option Al5-yeal and York 96 gal. tote: ----- York 96 gal. tote: --.—. York 96 gal, tote: ....... York 96 gal. tote: --- York 96 gal tote: ---- Oswego Option B, 3year Osw 2-33 gal. owner: ----- 05w 2-33 gal. of --- Osw 2-33 gal. owner. ----- N /A N /A N/A N/A 05w 65 gal contractor tote: --- Osw 65 gal. contractor tote: ----- Osw 65 gal contractor tote: ...__ N /A N /A N/A N/A Osw 2d3 gal. owner, senior. ----- Osw 233 gal. owner, senior: ---- Osw 2-33 gal. owner, senior: ....... N /A N /A N/A N/A Osw 65 gal. Cant tote, senior: Osw 65 gal. con. tote, senior: ---- Osw 65 gal.Cant tote, senior. ---- N /A N /A N/A N/A - York 33 gal. tote ---- York 33 gal tote: ---- I York 33 gal tote: --- - York 33 gal tote: ----- York 33 gal. tote: -- -- York 65 gal, tote: ----- York 65 gal.tote: ----- York 65 gal. tote: ....... York 65 gal, tote: ------ York 65 gal. tote: ------ NO BID York 96 gal. tote: ------ York 96 gal. tote: -- York 96 gal tote: ....... York 96 gal. tote: -....— York 96 gal. tote: ....... Yorkville Option A (5-yeal and Osw 33 gal. tote: ----- Dow 33 gal. tote: ....... Osw 33 gal. tote: ----- N /A N/A N/A N/A Oswego Option C, 3�year Osw 65 gal. tote: ....... Osw 65 gal. tote: ------ Osw 65 gal. tote: ----- N /A N /A N/A N/A Osw 96 gal. tote: ------ Dew 96 gal. tote: ....... Osw 96 gal. tote: -...-- N /A N /A N/A N/A Osw 33 gal. tote, senior: ------ Osw 33 gal. tote, senior: --- Dew 33 gal. tote, senior: ....... N /A N/A N/A N/A Osw65 gal tote:, senior Osw 65 gal tote:, senior --- Osw 65 gal. tote:, senior ----- N /A N/A N/A N/A 05w%gal tote,senior --- Osw%gal, tote,senior: --- Osw 96 gal. tote, senior: ---- N /A N/A N/A N/A York 33 gal. tote: ....... York 33 gal tote: -- York 33 gal tote - York 33 gal. tote, ---- Pork 33 gal. tote: - YorkvilleOptionBIS-year) and NO BID York 65 gal. tote: ---- York 65 gal. tote: --- York 65 gal.tole: --- - York 65 gal.tote: --- York 65 gal. tote: ....— Oswego Option A, 3year York 96 gal. tote: ---- York 96 gat tote: ....... York 96 gal. tote: - -- - York 96 gal tote: -..--- York 96 gal, tote: — -- Oswresident --.. Oki resident ----- Caw resident ---- N /A N/A N/A N/A Osw senior --- Osw senior. ....... Osw senior. ....... NIA N/A N/A N/A York 33 gal. tote: ---- York 33 gal. tote: — York 33 gal tote: --- York 33 gal.tote: -- - Pork 33 gal tote: - --- NOBID York 65 gal. tote: --- York 65 gal. tote: ....... York 65 gal, tote: ----- York 65 gal. tote: --- York 65 gal, tote: ....... Yorkville Option B (5-year) and York 96 gal. tote: ---- York 96 gal,tote: --- York 96 gal. tote: ....... York 96 gal, tote: ----- York 96 gal, tote: ....... Oswego Option B. 3-Year Osw 233 gal. owner. — Caw 233 gal. owner ---- Osw 2-33 gal, owner: .._._ N /A N /A N/A N/A Osw 65 gal. contractor tote: ....... Osw 65 gal contractor tote: -- Osw 65 gal, contractor tote: ---- N /A N /A N/A N/A Osw, 2-33 gal. owner, senior: --- Osw 2-33 gal. owner, senior: - - Osw 233 gal. owner, senior: - ..... N /A N /A N/A N/A Osw 65 gal cont tote, senior: Osw 65 gal cont tote, senior: ...... Osw 65 gal. con. tote, senior: - — N /A N /A N/A N/A York 33 gal, tote ----- York 33 gal tote ....... York 33 gal.tote: ----- York 33 gal tote: ---- York 33 gal. tote: -- -- York 65 gal, tote: --- York 65 gal, tote: - -- York 65 gal. tote: ----- York 65 gal, tote: ---- York 65 gal,tote: ----- York 96 gal, tote: ---- York 96 gal. tote: ----- York%gal. tote: ---- York 96 gal. tote: --- York 96 gal tote: — --- YorkvilleOptionB(Syear) and NO BID Osw 33 gal. tote: ... Oki 33 gal. tote: ...... Osw 33 gal. tote: ------- N /A N /A N/A N/A Oswego Option C, 3 year Dew 65 gal,tole: ----- Osw 65 gal tote: ------- Osw 65 gal. tote: ---- N /A N /A N/A N/A Osw 96 gal.tole: ----- Osw 96 gal. cote: ------ Osw%gal. tote: --- N /A N /A N/A N/A Dew 33 gal,tote, senior: -- Osw 33 gal.tole, senior: ------- Osw 33 gal. tote, senior: ----- N /A N /A N /A N /A OSw 65 gal.tote:, senior ----- Osw 65 gal.tote:, senior ---- Osw 65 gal tote:, senior ....... N/A N /A N /A N /A Osw 96 gal.tote, senior: ....... Oev 96 gal tote, senior ....... Osw 96 gal tote, senior: --- N/A N /A N /A N /A Sep 2to MaYl, 2D13t0 INWIF May 1, 2014 to May 1, 2015 to Apri[3D,2015 April 30, 2016 York 33 gal,tote: $17,10 York 33 gal.tote: $17, l 61 York 33 ga tote: $18-14 York 33 gal,pro: $1869 York 33 gal. tote: $19.25 Yorkville Option A(5 year)and York 65 gal.tote: 517.10 York 65 gal.tote: $17.61 York 65 gal, tote: $18,14 York 65 gal. tote: $1869 York 65 gal. tote: 51935 Oswego Option A, Sryear York 96 gal tote: $1710 York 96 gal tote: $17.61 York 96 gal,tote $18,14 York 96 gal.tote: $1669 York 96 gal tote 51935 Osw resident $1825 Osw resident: $188o Osw resident: $1936 Osw resident: 519.94 Osw resident $20.54 Osw senior: 517.25 Osw senior: $17.77 Osw senior: $18.30 Osw senior $1885 Ow senior 51942 York 33 gal. tote: $17.10 York 33 gal. tote: $17.61 York 33 gal tote $1814 York 33 gal tote $1869 Pork 33 gal. tote: $19.25 York 65 gal. tote: $1710 York 65 gal.tote: $17.61 York 65 gal.tote: $18,14 York 65 gal sots: $18.69 York 65 gal. tote: $1925 Yorkville Option A (S year)a no York 96 gal. tote: $1710 York 96 gal.tote: 517,61 York 96 gal cote: $18.14 York 96 gal, tote: $18.69 York 96 gal. tote: 519.25 Oswego Option S. 5 year Osw 2-92 gal.owns[ $1]68 Osw 2-33 gal,owner: $18.21 osw 233 go 1. owner: 51876 Osw 2-33 gal. owner: $1932 Osw 233 gal. owner: $19.90 Osw 65 gal. contractor tote: $1]68 Osw 65 gal. contractor tote: $18.21 Oew 65 gal. contractor tote: $1876 Osw 65 gal contractor tote: $19.32 Osw 65 gal. contractor tote: $19.90 Osw 2-33 gal ow $1668 Osw 2-33 gal. owner, senior $1718 Osw 2-33 gal owner, senior: $17.70 Oew 2-33 gal. owner, senior. $1833 Osw 233 gal. ow $1877 owner, senor' ner, senior' Over 65 gal, cent.tote, senior: ---.- Osw 65 gal Corp. tote, senior: ....... Osw 65 gal cent tote, senior: ....... Osw 65 gal. cent.tote, senior: ....... Oew 65 gal cent. tae, senior. ----- York 33 gal tote: $1710 York 33 gal.tote: $17.61 York 33 gal tote: $1814 York 33 gal. tote: $1869 York 33 gal tote $1915 York 65 gal tote: $17,10 York 65 gal.tote: 51]61 York 65 gal. tote: $18.14 York 65 gal tote: $1869 York 65 gal tote: 51925 York 96 gal tote: $17,10 York 96 gal,tote: 517,61 York 96 gal rote: $18.14 York 96 go 1. tote: $18.69 York 96 gal tote: $1925 Yorkville Option A(S year)and Osw,33 gal. cote: 51748 Osw 33 gal.tote: Si8A0 Osw 33 gal tote: $18,54 Oew 33 gal. tote: $19,10 Osw 33 gal. tote: $1967 Oswego Option C, 5-year Osw 65 gal tote: $17,48 Osw 65 gal,tote: $1800 Osw 65 gal tote: $18.54 Osw 65 gal. tote: $1910 Osw 65 gal tote: 51967 Osw 96 gal.tote: $1748 Osw 96 gal.tote: 51800 Osw 96 gal tote: $18.54 O¢w 96 gal. tote: $1910 Osw 96 gal. tote: $19,67 Osw 33 gal.tote, senior: $1648 Osw 33 gal, tote, senior $1697 Osw 33 gal tote, senior. $17,48 Osw 33 gal tote, senior $18.01 Osw 33 gal.tote, senior, $1855 Oaw 65 gal cote:, senior --- Osw 65 gal. tote:, senior -- Osw65 gal tote:, senior ---- Osw 65 gal tote:, senior ----- Osw 65 gal Lois:, senior --- osw96 gal tote, senior: ....... Osw,96 gal cote, senior: ------- Oew 96 gal, tote, senior ----- Ostia%gal, tote, senior ----- Osw 96 gal. tote, senior: ....... York 33 gal tote: $1830 York 93 gal.tote: $1885 York 33 gal tote $19.41 York 33 gal. tote: $20,00 York 33 gal. tote $20.60 Yorkville Option 8(5-year)and York 65 gal.tote: $1830 York 65 gal.tote: $1885 York 65 gal tote: $1941 York 65 gal. tote: $2000 York 65 gal soon: $2060 Oswego Option A, S year York 96 gal tote: $1830 York 96 gal tote: 51885 York 96 gal, tote: $19,41 York 96 gal. tote: 52000 York 96 gal. tote: $20,60 Osw, resident $18.25 Osw resident: $1880 Osw resident: $1936 Osw, resident: $1994 Osw resident 520.54 osw senior: $1725 Osw senior: $1777 Over senior: $1830 Osw senior: $18,85 Osw senior: $19,42 York 33 gal.tote: $1830 York 33 gal.tote: 518.85 York 33 gal. tote: $19.41 York 33 gal tote $2000 York 33 gal. tote: 52060 York 65 gal.tote: $1830 York 65 gal.tote: $18.85 York 65 gal. tote: $19.41 York 65 gal. tote: $2000 York 65 gal. tote: $20.60 Yorkville Option B (5-year and York 96 gal.tote: $1830 York 96 gal.tote: 518.85 York 96 gal, tote: $19.41 York 96 gal tote: $2000 York 96 gal. tote: $20.60 Oswego Option B, S year Osw 2-33 gal owner: $1768 Osw 2-33 gal.owner: $18.21 Oew, 2-33 gal. owner: $18.76 Osw 2d3 gal. owner. $1932 Osw 233 gal. owner $1990 Osw 65 gat. contractor tote: $1768 Osw 65 gal. contractor tote: $18.21 Ozw 65 gal, contractor tote: $18.76 Osw 65 gal. contractortote: $1932 Osw 65 gal. contractor tote: $1990 Osw 233 gal. ow $1668 Osw 2-23 gal. ow $17.18 Osw2-33gal. owner, senior $17,70 Osw 2-33 gal. owner, senior: $18.23 Osw 2-33 gal. ow $1877 owner, senior owner, senior: ner, senior Osw 65 Qal, coot tote, senior: Osw 65 gal coot rote, senior ---- Osw 65 gal. cent.tote, senior ------ Osw 65 gal. coot tote, senior: ----- Ozw 65 gal. coot tote, senior. ..- - York 33 gal,tote: $1830 York 33 gal cote: $18.85 York 33 gal. tote: $19.41 York 33 gal tote $2000 York 33 gal ton. $2060 York 65 gal.tote: 51830 York 65 gal.tote: $18,95 York 65 gal tote: $1941 York 65 gal tote: $20.0 York 65 gal. tote: 52060 York 96 gal. tote: $18.30 York 96 gal,tote: $1885 York 96 gal, tote: 519.41 York 96 gal tote: $2000 York 96 Cal. tot¢ 52060 Yorkville Option B (5year) and Osw 33 gal. tote: $17.48 Oew 33 gal.tote $18.00 Oew 33 gal,tote: $18,54 Osw 33 gal, tote: $19.10 Osw 33 gat tore: 51967 Oswego Option C, 5 year Osw 65 gal. tote: $17,48 Osw 65 gal. tote: $1800 Ozw 65 gal.tote: $18,54 Oew 65 gal, tote: $19,10 Osw 65 gal. tote: $19.67 Osw 96 gal. tote: $17.48 Osw 96 gal tote: $1800 Osw 96 gal, Cote: $1854 Osw 96 gal, tote: 51910 claw Sir gal, tote: 51967 Osw 33 gal, tote, senior $1648 Osw 33 gal. tote, senior: $16.97 Osw 33 gal, rote, senior $1748 Oiw 33 gal.tote, senior: $1801 Ow, 33 gal. tote, senior: 518.55 Ozw6Sgal tore: senior --- Osw65gal. tote:, se o" ---- Osw 65 gal tote:, senior ------ Osw 65 gal.tote:. senior ----. Osw 65 gal tote: senior --- Osw96 al, tote, senior: ---. Osw96 gal tope, senior. -- Osw 96 cal. tote, senior: ----- Osw 96 gal.tote, senior: ---- Osw 96 gal, tote, senior: ----- United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego APPENDIX 2 REQUIRED RECYCLABLES TO BE COLLECTED The City requires that the Contractor shall collect the following recyclable material for the entire term of the contract. Additionally, the Contractor is encouraged to identify additional items they will be collecting, not on the current list. Required Recyclable Materials • brown paper bags • corrugated cardboard • boxes and cartons • chipboard/paperboard (to include brown or gray box board or paperboard, cereal boxes, shoe boxes, & paper towel cores) • magazines and catalogues • mixed paper, glossy & non-glossy (to include stationary, notebook paper, post-it notes, computer paper, typing paper, flyers, greeting cards, file folders and all envelopes, with and without windows) • newspaper (including all supplements) • telephone books • wet strength carrier stock (to include paper board used for refrigerated and frozen items) • frozen food packages • aerosol cans • aluminum cans and foil • formed aluminum containers and wraps • aseptic packaging and gable top containers • formed steel containers • glass bottles and jars (brown, green, and clear) • plastic containers (colored or cloudy white HDPE milk, juice and/or water bottles, jars and jugs) • all plastic containers # 1 through #5 and plastic containers #7 • LDPE and HDPE soft plastic six (6) and twelve ( 12) pack rings • steel cans • steel paint cans and lids • household batteries Other Recyclable Materials Proposed by Contractor ® See attached List 40 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego APPENDIX SCHEDULE Or ALTERNATIVES AND DEVIATIONS Please list any proposed alternative or deviation to the minimum standards outlined in the specifications section of this document. (Please attach additional sheets if necessary.) i 1 i Please See Attached List of Clarifications and Deviations 41 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego APPENDIX SCHEDULE OF ILLINOIS MUNICIPALITIES SERVED Please list municipal references. (Please attach additional sheets if necessary) Municipality Contact Name & Service Explanation of Collection and Tele hone Number Dates Dis osal Pro ram Please See Attached List of M nicipal R ferences 42 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego APPENDIX LOCATION OF DISPOSAL FACILITIES Please provide below information concerning the facilities, which are intended to be used for the disposal of refuse, yard waste, and recyclable materials collected at the curbside. (Please attach additional sheets if necessary.) REFUSE r ine of Facilit Facilit Address Disposal Limitations Orchard Hills Highway 251 South , Non- hazardous solid l Davis Junction , IL waste only RECYCLING Name of Facilit Facilitv Address Disposal Limitations RMC Resource Management 9999 Anderson Ave . Recycling Only Companies Chicago Ridge , IL YARD WASTE Name of Facilit Facility Address Disposal Limitations Green Organics , Inc . 1270 E . Beecher Rd . Yard waste and Bristol , IL 60512 organics 43 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego APPENDIX CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS None of Business : Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest , LLC Business Address : Mailing Address : 1660 Hubbard Avenue , lst Floor Batavia , Illinois 60510 Business Number: ( 630 ) 587 - 8282 Emergency Number: ( 630 ) 587 - 8282 Fax Number: ( 630 ) 761 - 3105 Ownership : Individual Partnership Corporation Franchise or Parent Company (if applicable) : Veolia ES Solid Waste of North America , LLC 125 S . 84th Street Suite 200 Milwaukee WI 53214 List all Partners, Managers, and Corporate Officers : Name 'Title Residence Phone Please see the attached list of Corporate^officers Days of Operation: Monday - Saturday Business flours : M-F : 7 : 30 - 5 : 00 , Saturday : 8 : 00 -Noon Number of Employees: Supervisors : 5 Drivers : 52 Office Personnel : 5 Signature: _ Date: 04 / 09 / 12 Jam M . Rooney Reg nal Vice President 44 VEOLIA ES SOLID WASTE MIDWEST LLC FEIN: 76-0839612 Business type: Limited liability company organized in Wisconsin on 10/ 18/06 IL Qualification: Qualified to do business in Illinois on 12/7/06 ; also does business in IL under registered dba of " Veolia Environmental Services " The company is a LLC with a sole member , Veolia ES Solid Waste of North America, LLC . Additional information on the sole member is shown below . Additionally , the company has the following officers , none of which holds any ownership interest in the company : Officers: President James M . Long Vice President & Treasurer Raphael B . Bruckert Vice President & Secretary Michael K. Slattery Vice President Michael Dougherty Vice President James M . Rooney Assistant Secretary Matthew C . Gunnelson Assistant Treasurer Henry P . Karius Sole Member: Veolia ES Solid Waste of North America, LLC , A LLC organized in Wisconsin (FEIN : 39- 1733405) Address : 125 S . 84"' Street, Suite 200 Milwaukee, WI 53214 Ph : 414-479-7800 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego EXHIBIT A SOLID WASTE COLLECTION DAY MAP See attached At the outset of the contract , Veolia intends to use the current collection routing scheme in both the Village of Oswego and the United City of Yorkville . 45 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego EXHIBIT B SERVICES FOR MUNICIPAL AND PUBLIC FACILITIES Location Service Type Size Frequency Yorkville Library Refuse I - 1 .5 yd Ix/wk 902 Game Farm Road Recycling 1 - 1 .5 yd Ix/wk Yorkville City Hall and Refuse 1 -6 yd 2x/wk Police Department Recycling 1 -2 yd cardboard I x/wk 800 Game Farm Road Recycling (paper) 6-96 gallon toters I x/wk Yorkville Public Works Recycling I -2 yd cardboard Ix/wk 610 Tower Lane Refuse 1 -20 yd open Ix/wk Yorkville Parks and Refuse 1 -20 yd open 1 x/wk Recreation Satellite Recycling 1 -96 gallon toter Ix/wk Office at Old Post Office Recycling 1 - I yd cardboard Ix/wk 201 W, Hydraulic Avenue Yo se kville Parks and Refu 1 - 1 .5 yd lx wk Recreation Riverfront Recycling 2-96 gallon toter Ix/wk Administrative Building 301 E. Hydraulic Yorkville Parks and Refuse 1 - 1 .5 yd Ix/wk Recreation Riverfront Recycling 2-96 gallon toter Ix/wk Program Building 131 E. Hydraulic Yorkville Beecher Center Refuse 1 -4yd refuse Ix/wk 908 Game Farm Road Recycle 1 -2yd recycle Ix/wk Yorkville REC Center Refuse 1 -6 yd Ix/wk 202 E Countryside Pkwy Recycle 1 -6 yd Ix/wk Oswego Public Works Refuse 1 -5 yd Ix/wk 100 Theodore Drive Recycle 1 -5 yd Ix/wk Landscape refuse 1 -20 yd lx/wk Street sweeping refuse 1 -20 yd Ix/wk Oswego Police Refuse 1 -5 yd Ix/wk Department Recycle 1 -5 yd Ix/wk 3525 US Rt. 34 Oswego Village Hall Refuse 1 -5 yd Ix/wk 100 Parkers Mill Recycle 1 -5 yd Ix/wk All Citv and Village Refuse 96 gal.toters, 33 gal. toters, 18 Rentals When Required gal. toters 30 yd open dumpster 46 United City of Yorkville and Village of Oswego (Exhibit B continued) The location of the facilities, the number of facilities, their bin/tote size, and pickup schedule are subject to change throughout the lift of the contract. The Contractor shall provide, at no cost to the City, the collection and disposal of all refuse, recycling, and yard waste, or more often if requested by the City. A comprehensive recycling program shall also be provided at no cost for the municipal facilities listed above (new or additional facilities may be added at any time during the Contract term). The Contractor shall be responsible for supplying all service equipment associated with totes and containers/dumpsters to said facilities as set forth in the Contract. 47 Deviations and Clarifications 1 . Clarification — The prices quoted are for billing to the City directly and not each individual resident. 2. Deviation — The indemnification shall be limited to the extent such damages or injuries are caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of Veolia. 3 . Deviation — Veolia requests that the following Force Majeure language be included into the contract: FORCE MAJEURE: Neither CONTRACTOR nor the CITY shall be liable for the failure to perform their duties nor for any resulting damage, loss, etc., if such failure is caused by a catastrophe, terrorism, riot, war, strike, fire, accident, act of God, including inclement weather, or other similar or different contingency beyond the reasonable control of CONTRACTOR or the CITY. 4. Clarification - Materials to be added to the recycling program will be by mutual consent of the City and Veolia. 5 . Clarification - #6 Polystyrene will not to be included in the recycling program until such time as there is a sustainable and market for the material. 6. Deviation — Veolia requests that the following Change in Law language be included in the contract: The rates shall be adjusted based on any changes in law, rule or regulation (whether federal state or local) or any increases in applicable taxes, surcharges and fees (including host community fees) which results in increased costs to Veolia on the equipment or services provided. RFP NARRATIVE Executive Summary Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC. (Veolia) has read and understands the specifications in preparation for our RFP response for the United City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego. As you know, Veolia is particularly well suited to provide residential refuse, recycling and yard waste collection to the United City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego because among other reasons, we are located close to the City and Village. Veolia has a hauling and transfer station in Batavia, located at 1660 Hubbard Avenue and 766 Hunter Drive respectively. The trucks and equipment that will be used for the refuse, recycling, and yard waste collection in the United City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego will be housed and dispatched out of our Batavia facility. The proximity of our location to the City and Village means that in the event of a breakdown, where the truck is inoperable, Veolia can have a replacement vehicle in place in a maximum of 3 hours. In addition to these facilities, Veolia has set up a comprehensive internal network of hauling locations, transfer stations and disposal facilities to insure cost effective, long term solid waste and recycling collection as well as processing and disposal for our municipal customers. By retaining and selecting Veolia to provide the residential recycling collection in the United City of Yorkville, the real potential of a problematic transition to a new hauler will be completely avoided because we currently service the City. In the case of the Village of Oswego, the real potential of a problematic transition to a new hauler will be completely avoided because of our proven transitional approach. We feel that Veolia currently provides exemplary collection service to the residents of the municipalities we serve and better than any other provider in our field. Service to the residents is the most important aspect of residential collection. To that end, Veolia is extremely customer service oriented. As an example, when the City of Wilmette was hit with the violent storms in the fall of 2008, Veolia responded with full force to the City's request for extraordinary service to clean-up the massive storm damage throughout the City. Veolia was able to call in trucks from all over the Chicagoland area as well as from out of state to provide the service required. This type of service and mobilization response is not possible from a smaller independent hauler. Veolia has proven that we can and will be available when the City calls on us for service. Included No Cost Website Access and Links Should Veolia be awarded the collection contract for the Village of Oswego, a brochure will be developed specifically for the Village and residents of Oswego. In addition Veolia operates a web site: www.veoliaes_com. On this website, Veolia provides information about the refuse, recycling and yard waste programs in each of the municipalities we serve in the Chicagoland area. Upon award of the contract, Veolia will immediately update the website to include Oswego; providing information on the residential program the Oswego. In addition, we will have this site linked with the municipality' s website, if requested, in order to provide residents the easiest access to the site and program information. Veolia maintains the site and the information contained in it so there is no burden placed on the Village to keep the site current and up to date. We do all of that for you. Please feel free to browse our website to get an idea of just how easy it is for your residents to access information and have questions answered without having to call the City offices. The United City of Yorkville is already part of our residential network and should it be necessary to update the webpage, Veolia can do so with very little effort. Safety & Training Programs Veolia has in a number comprehensive safety programs in place at our Batavia division to ensure that the employees we use to service the City and Village are well trained and perform their duties in the safest manner possible. There is nothing more important to Veolia than the safety of our employees, our customer and the public. It is clearly summed up in our motto; "Service First, Safety Always". A list of some of these programs is provided below. 1 . Pre-employment Screening Policy All potential new employees are put through a thorough screening process to ensure that Veolia is hiring the best possible candidates for a job. The pre- employment screening, among other things, includes a background check, physical examination/functional evaluation, drug and alcohol screening, and caliper/DPAS evaluation. 2. New Hire Training Policy This is a comprehensive training program that Veolia has instituted to ensure that the drivers of our vehicles receive the proper training for the job they will be performing and the vehicle they will be driving. The three week program encompasses both classroom and behind the wheel training with the opportunity for the new hire to interact with an experienced trainer. 3 . Driver Qualification Policy The purpose of this program is to ensure that all employees who operate commercial motor vehicles know their responsibilities required to comply with the Federal Motor Safety regulations pertaining to safe operating practices, and requirements related to inspection and reporting. 4. Alcohol & Substance Abuse Policy The purpose of this program is to establish uniform procedures in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations to ensure that Veolia will have a safe, productive, drug and alcohol free workplace. 2 5 . Personal Protective Equipment Policy Veolia has developed a Personal Protective Equipment Program in order to minimize exposure to a variety of hazards that can cause injury 6. Accident & Injury Repeater Policy This policy establishes a consistent, progressive and systematic mechanism to correct the unsafe behaviors that result in accidents, injuries, and losses; or to remove those individuals who demonstrate repeated unsafe behavior from the workforce. 7. Driver/Operator Distraction Policy All employees are prohibited from the unauthorized use of cell phones and communications devices while operating company vehicles or equipment. Smoking, eating, load music or using devices with earphones are also prohibited while operating company vehicles or equipment. 8 . Seatbelt Use Policy For safety reasons, Veolia requires that all employees operating, or riding in, a company owned, leased, or rented vehicle that is equipped with seatbelts, wear seatbelts while the vehicle is in motion. 9. I Care Policy The purpose of this policy is to observe and evaluate an employee' s performance during a normal workday. Management will conduct random, unannounced observations of employees rating their work skills, personal safety, service standards and vehicle/equipment condition. The results of these observations will help management assess, address and correct any safety concerns. 10. Safety Always — 10 Primary Safety Rules Policy This policy is in place to ensure all employees follow prescribed guidelines and generally accepted safe practices, that when not followed may be a contributing cause to accidents causing serious injury or death: a. Safety Devises b. Container Safety Latches c. Snaking/ZigZagging/Criss-crossing d. Vehicle Backing e. Secure vehicle and equipment safely f. Seat belts 3 g. Speed limits h. Dual drive (right side) secondary position vehicles i. Disposal/recycling/transfer station rules j . Certain accidents Maintenance Programs Veolia has in a number comprehensive maintenance programs in place at our Batavia division to ensure that the collection vehicles we use to service the City and Village are well maintained, safe and dependable. A brief summary of some of these programs is provided below. 1 . Tire program, mounting & dismounting This maintenance program is in place to ensure that the tires are put on and taken off the on the truck safely and properly. This program is aimed at eliminating the possibility injuries while changing tires. 2. Torque & Re-torque program This program is in place to ensure that the lug nuts used to keep the tires on the truck do not work themselves looses while the truck is on the road. This is a very important maintenance and safely program because if wheels are not re-torqued 24 hours after they are put on there is a possibility that the lug nuts could work themselves loose and the wheel could come off the truck while moving. The Re- Torque program is also followed throughout our routine PM program, done during every PM. 3 . Wheel Stud & Nut replacement program This program is in place to ensure that the wheel studs and nuts used to secure the wheel to the truck are periodically replaced. This is necessary because over time a studs can become stretched and nuts can become stripped therefore creating a safety hazard. 4. RTA, our full maintenance tracking program. This program is our computerized record tracking program used for scheduling our PM's and preventive maintenance for all of our vehicles and equipment. Each of our vehicles receives preventative maintenance at scheduled intervals based on the number hours each vehicle has operated. 4 5 . Brake S .O.P. This program is in place to ensure that the brakes on all of our vehicles are fully functional at all times. This program is especially important to the residential collection vehicles due to the number of stops each makes daily. 6. Multi-Seal program, eliminating flat tires while on route This program is in place to reduce the downtime of our collection vehicle due to flat tires that may be caused by the frequent trips into landfills to dump. Veolia uses a multi-seal inside each tire that seals leaks thus preventing the need to change the tire. This translates to less route downtime and therefore ensuring more predicable timely route collection. 7. Parker Hydraulic Hose program This program is in place and is aimed at reducing and eliminating blown hydraulic hoses and leaks that may occur on the residential routes. 8 . Fleet replacement Program The fleet replacement program is a measure that we follow on replacing our collection trucks, making sure we keep the fleet as new as possible. We have a schedule that we follow for each line of business 9. Our Veolia Maintenance Managers, are a member of the TMC ( Technology & Maintenance Council The TMC is a group of members that are testing new products, testing the products that we are using today to see that the product is safe, testing to see if it is productive, and once a product or issue finishes it testing, the product or issue is placed under a R.P. (Recommended Practice) TMC not only tests new products, they also take the maintenance on a fleet truck, and they study the way it is maintained. Building better ways to achieve a safe way to repair, maintain, and simply make sure it is safe to perform the function of the repair. Customer Service Program Customer Service is a priority at Veolia. We feel that we manage the contract for the City and Village. We do our best and focus our efforts on ensuring that the City and Village are not spending resources on managing the refuse collection contract. Veolia has trained customer service representatives who are very familiar with requests posed by residential customers. These customer service representatives are available to assist the residents of Yorkville and Oswego during normal business hours. 5 Veolia has an intensive customer service training program that each customer service representative (CSR) must go through. Veolia has undertaken the task of using an outside customer service training company; Tooty, Inc. to assist and compliment the training of our customer service representatives. We have realized a great success in the improvement of our customer service departments since we began the program four years ago. Our improved customer service translates into the City residents having their questions answered and problems addressed in a prompt and courteous manner. Below are some of the aspects of the CSR training program: Audits Every Veolia location receives weekly secret shopper phone calls to test the effectiveness and helpfulness of their customer service and sales staff. Those calls and evaluations are reviewed with the individual CSR promptly to address any concerns or training needs. The guidelines that Veolia has established are the toughest in the Environmental Services industry. Our philosophy of "One Call Does It All" empowers the person who answers the phone to help the customer with anything he/she may need. There is a big focus on voice, attitude and wording, and the impact a customer service representative can have on a customer. Equal importance is give to the accuracy in setting up new orders and service issue resolution. New Hire Training All newly hired CSR' s go through an 8 hour classroom training session that focuses on: • Voice, attitude and wording • Industry education on residential, commercial and roll-off services • Review of scripts for effective handling of sales and service issues • Role-playing Upon completion of the training each participant receives a certificate. On-Going Customer Service Training Veolia continually strives to provide the best customer service in the industry. To that end, each CSR receives ongoing training in either half and/or full-day classroom training session customized for each location to continue the development of each CSR. In addition, Tooty Inc. conducts 90 minute webinars when needed to address market specific issues or changes We will make available (to City and Village staff) the phone numbers of key individuals to be contacted in the event that City or Village staff needs to contact them. We are currently in the process of developing an email process that allows residents to use an email to forward questions, comments and service issues. Once the process is finalized we will roll it out to the City and Village. The Veolia/Batavia division has a live operator that answers the phone and directs calls. We have found that this is still the most customer friendly method of addressing customer' s needs. In addition, Veolia' s customer service department is local and housed in our Batavia hauling location. We do not subscribe to the regional customer service departmental approach that spans an entire state like some of our competitors. 6 Operational Approach Veolia understands all of the requirements for providing refuse, recycling and yard waste collection service to the United City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego with respect to the specifications contained in this RFP. Because the Village of Oswego is not familiar with the level of service we provide, we have provided as one of our attachments to this proposal, letters of recommendation from Oak Lawn, St. Charles and Batavia along with numerous other references, to show that Veolia as a company strives to provide the best residential collection service available. Please feel free to call anyone of the municipalities to be assured of the superior service the Village of Oswego can expect. Curbside Collection Program Refuse Collection For curbside refuse collection, Veolia proposes to use the same collection schedule for refuse collection, providing for refuse, recycling, and yard waste collection on the same day of the week to each resident. Veolia proposes to collect refuse, recycling, and yard waste Monday through Friday. With this collection schedule we feel that we can offer the City and Village the best price possible by combining both municipalities in our routes. Veolia will be utilizing front loading residential collection vehicles (FEL's) for the refuse collection. By utilizing these vehicles, our drivers will have the ability to provide automated collection for the 95,65, or 35-gallon refuse carts as well as have the ability to service the residents who use conventional refuse cans and/or bags for additional refuse outside of the containers. These vehicles also do well collecting bulk items. Because the number of units serviced each day may vary, Veolia will have available a sufficient number of refuse vehicles to service the heaviest day of the week. We can make an example of this truck available to the City or Village for inspection if you desire. Veolia will distribute new refuse carts to all residents prior to the beginning of the contract. Spring and Fall Clean-up Veolia will have all of the men and vehicles available to provide the require spring clean- up to the City and Village. Veolia will work closely with the Village and City to develop a clean-up schedule. By doing so, the City will remain much cleaner because garbage will probably not be put out until the night before the clean-up. Veolia anticipates having the entire clean-up done within a single week. Recycling Collection For curbside recycling collection, Veolia proposes to use the same collection schedule outlined above with refuse, recycling, and yard waste collection on the same day of the week to each resident. As with refuse collection, Veolia will be utilizing fiont loading residential collection vehicles (FEL' s) for the recycling collection. By utilizing these vehicles, our drivers will have the ability to service the 65-gallon recycling carts that will be distributed to all residents. These vehicles will still have the ability to manually 7 service the residents who may have additional recycling outside of the cart. Because the number of units serviced each day may vary, Veolia will have available a sufficient number of recycling vehicles to service the heaviest day of the week. We can make an example of this truck available to the City for inspection if you desire. Veolia has had much success increasing the recycling rates by utilizing the 65-gallon recycling cart in place of the 18-gallon bins and 35-gallon recycling carts. There are many advantages to using 65-gallon recycling carts. Just a few examples are: 1 . The wind-blown recycling litter is virtually eliminated keeping the neighborhoods much cleaner. 2. The use of the carts keeps the neighborhoods neater looking on collection day because all of the recyclables are contained in the cart. 3 . There is much less of a chance of injury to our recycling driver with the use of the carts because they are emptied by the use of semi-automated collection equipment. 4. The 65-gallon recycling cart is much more user friendly in that a resident can fit the contents of at least 3 recycling bins and because of its shape, twice as much as a35-gallon recycling cart. Yard Waste Collection For curbside yard waste collection, Veolia proposes to use the same collection schedule as refuse and recycling during the yard waste season. Veolia will be utilizing the same front loading residential collection vehicles (FEL's) that will be used for refuse and recycling collection. By utilizing these vehicles, our drivers will have the ability to service the residents who use conventional refuse cans and/or bags as well as those who may elect to use carts for yard waste collection. Because the amount of yard waste varies so greatly during the season, Veolia will have available a sufficient number of yard waste collection vehicles to service the heaviest day of the week during the heaviest part of the season. We can make an example of this truck available to the City for inspection if you desire. Veolia will have all of the men and vehicles on hand, trained and ready to provide residential refuse, recycling and yard waste collection service to the residents of Oswego when the contract starts August 1 , 2012. The United City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego have already established a collection schedule for weekly collection service, and Veolia anticipates using the same, current routing scheme for curbside refuse, recycling and yard waste collection. In the future, and with the City or Village' s input, it may be necessary to adjust the collection schedule for some of the residents; Veolia will attempt to move the minimum number of residents possible to accommodate the necessary change. This translates into as little disruption to the residents as possible. We understand that a day change can potentially become a problem for the residents and the City of Village, therefore Veolia is prepared to address and eliminate this potential as we have done very successfully for other 8 communities we have transitioned. We have experienced great success in the past utilizing our procedure. As the timeline for implementation permits, Veolia will publish a map in the local paper showing the collection schedule for each section of the City or Village. In addition Veolia will tag each residence with a door hanger indicating the new collection day. Veolia understands that a collection program change can potentially become a problem if not instituted correctly. We feel communication to the residents is of the utmost importance during this time and we can assure the City or Village that the communication provided to the residents will provide a smooth transition with minimal impact and no service disruption. To insure that service is maintained at the highest level and to be able to respond quickly to any request by the City, Village or a resident, Veolia will assign a residential route manager for the residential accounts in the United City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego. The residential route manager will be in contact with the designated representative from the City or Village on a daily basis to react quickly to any request that the City or Village might have. This system works very well in the municipalities we currently service. As an enhancement to Yorkville or Oswego, we can make available to the City or Village, one of our radios so that the City or Village can contact our route supervisor directly should the need arise. As part of the education of the residents to the new program, we have provided as an attachment, copies of brochures that we have distributed in other communities. We use the brochures with great success at the start of a new contract or program. The brochure outlines the requirements for the preparation of recyclables as well as what recyclables are accepted in the program. Other important aspects of the refuse, recycling, and yard waste collection program are also outlined in the brochure. As you can see, these brochures are tailored to the unique program in each community. Each residence covered by the collection contract is given one of these brochures at the start of the contract as well as each new resident that moves into the community. Servicing Locations The United City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego will be serviced out of our hauling operation located in Batavia, Illinois. The vehicles will be housed there so that the trucks will be close to the City and Village. This operating location is ideally suited for servicing the Village of Owego and the United City of Yorkville. Veolia will be able to respond very, very quickly to the needs of the City or Village from this location. The addresses of our locations are: Hauling Company: Transfer Station: Veolia/Batavia Hauling Division Veolia/Batavia Transfer Station 1660 Hubbard Avenue 766 Hunter Drive Batavia, Illinois 60510 Batavia, Illinois 60510 Phone (630) 587-8282 Phone (630) 879-3587 9 Ortranizational Plan and Chart; Qualifications of Personnel Veolia is a well organized, decentralized company and is setup as to provide the most efficient, cost effective refuse and recycling collection in the industry. Provided as an attachment is a corporate overview of Veolia and the environmental services we provide. With respect to the management of the Yorkville and Oswego residential refuse, recycling and yard waste collection, we have provided the key management individuals who are responsible for all aspects related to our performance under this contract. In addition to the names of the individuals, we have provided relevant experience and currentjob descriptions, duties and responsibilities. We have also provided an organizational chart showing the reporting structure of each of the key individuals. You will quickly see that the key individuals who will continue to manage the residential contract in Yorkville and Oswego have extensive industry experience and backgrounds which make Veolia the best choice to continue to provide the refuse, recycling, and yard waste collection to the residents in Yorkville and begin to provide the service to Oswego. Jim Alderman, General Manager, has the ultimate responsibility for the management of the Batavia Hauling Division and Yorkville/Oswego residential contracts. The operations, sales and customer service managers all report to Jim. Mr. Alderman will be the primary point of contact to the both Yorkville and Oswego for all informational requests, customer issues or general inquiries. Jim has been in the industry for over 26 years, and managing residential services for more than 17 years. Scott Greiter, Operations Manager manages all aspects of services related to the City of Yorkville and the Village of Oswego. Scott has responsibility to ensure our drivers carry their daily duties in the safest manner possible. Carrying out Veolia's "Service First, Safety Always" mission is his passion. Scott has been in the industry for over 21 years and managing for more than 16 years. Steve Taxis, the residential supervisor and route manager, is responsible for the supervision of the residential drivers who work in Yorkville and Oswego and is responsible for responding to resident' s issues. One of Steve's primary responsibilities is ensuring that our drivers perform their duties in the safest manner possible. There is nothing more important to Veolia than the safety of our drivers, our customers, or the public. Steve has been in his position for past 4 years and has 21 years of industry experience Elyse Kowal, the Customer Service Manager, is responsible for, as the name implies, managing our local customer service representatives who will interface directly with the Yorkville and Oswego residential customers. Veolia believes in local customer service and Elyse is responsible for ensuring that the Yorkville and Plano customers are responded to promptly and in a polite and courteous manner. Elyse is responsible for training all customer service representatives with the program requirements of both the Yorkville and Oswego contracts so that the residents are provided with timely and accurate information. Elyse has been with us for 3 years and has over l 1 years of customer service experience. Bob Pfister, the Regional Municipal Marketing Manager is responsible for being the liaison between the City of Yorkville, the Village of Oswego and Veolia when it comes to public relations, providing continuing education, and overall service expectations. Bob is very familiar with Yorkville and Oswego and the service requirements and expectations of both municipalities and their residents. Bob has been in the industry for 31 years, all of which have been in the Chicagoland area. Organizational Chart for the Residential Refuse, Recycling and Yard Waste Collection for the VEOLIA United City of Yorkville ENVIRONMGNTAL SERVICES Oswego Regional Vice President 000 ri '.Central Region i `-James Rooney Area Manager Municipal Marketing Manager ;Northern Illinois Central Region James Rooney (acting) Bob Pfister General Manager Batavia Division ::.Jim Alderman Operations Manager:: Facility;& Operations Manager Customer Service Batavia:Hauling Div. '. Batavia Supervisor Scott Greiter Transfer Station Batavia Division Tom Maher Elyse Kowal Residential Route Supervisor Scale & Equipment Customer Service Batavia Hauling Division ;Operators at the Representatives Steve Taxis ': Batavia TS Batavia Division Residential Refuse, Recycling & Yard Waste Route Drivers for the United City of Yorkville and the Village of Piano': Veol'ta ES Solid waste m 'f' y 4;1 Midwest, LLC. b �o � f @, \ . qq ,Rt RIP) ( )7 ) ; N ')`) .gi ` 9gi'g' iG, gs�; ?i')') (• g., i @;:t NIA @g`. &"< 9' 3. G..ga4 4 g }§g�. Y�• ,4 a�, .f CONTAINERS: Aluminum Cans, Trays & Toil (trays &foil must be cleaned) Steel Cans & Tins Aseptic Packaging & Gable 'Top Containers (milk & juice cartons) Glass Bottles and Jars - (clear, brown, green) No window glass, auto glass, dinnerware or ceramics. PET Soda, Water, & Flavored Beverage Bottles (#I clear and green plastic resin) HDPE Milk, Water & Juice Jugs (02 clear plastic resin) HDPE Detergent & Fabric Softener Containers (92 colored plastic resin) PVC Narrow Neck Containers Only (03 plastic resin); such as health & beauty aid products, household cleaners. L,DPE Grocery Containers (#4 plastic resin); such as margarine tubs, frozen desert cups, six pack rings, etc. PP Grocery Containers (#5 plastic resin); such as yogurt cups, and narrow neck syrup and ketchup bottles. #7 Plastic Resin Narrow Neck Containers Only. Plastic Buckets, such as kitty litter containers (5 gallon size maximum) No metal handles. Notes: 1. All containers to be emptied and rinsed clean. 2. No motor oil, insecticide, herbicide or hazardous chemical containers. 3. No Plastic bags — instead reuse or return to grocery or department stores. 4 No plastic sheets or film (no plastic sheets, tarps or wrap). 5. Fxpanded foam and clear polystyrene not accepted per joint advisory from the Illinois Recycling Association, Illinois Department of Commerce & Community Affairs, and Region 5 U.S Environmental Protection Agency. PAPER FIBER. Newspaper, including inserts (remove plastic sleeves) Cardboard (no waxers cardboard) Draft (brown paper) Bags Magazines, Catalogs and Telephone Books Office, Computer, Notebook & Gift Wrap Paper (no metal clips, spirals, binders) Chipboard (cereal, cake & food :nix bosses, gift boxes, shoe boxes, etc.) Carrier Stock (soda & beer can carrying cases) Junk Mail & Envelopes (no plastic cards, stick on labels or unused stamps) Paper Back Books (no hard cover books) 'I'll li VI I.LAGE OP OAK LAWN April 29, 2009 Veolia LS Solid Waste Midwest, LLC 1660 1lubbard Avenue, 2°d rlour Batavia. 11. 605 10 Dear Bob, At your request, 1 am writing to attest to how pleased our Village was in the transition from our former hauler to Veolia in the summer of 2007. As you can well imagine, we were quite concerned about the transition and the impact it would have on our residents and the Village staff This is especially true when the new service provider is delivering 30,000 new carts to our residents. I lowever. Veolia developed a transition plan that ensured our residents received their new carts in a timely and orderly fashion. They also provided the necessary program information to make certain the residents had a smooth transition to the new service. Key members of the Veolia team provided regular updates to the Village staff and addressed the few issues that arose in a prompt and courteous manner. We have been very pleased with the level of professionalism and attentiveness we have received and continue to receive from Veolia. The Village of Oak Lawn looks forward to our continued relationship . Sincerely, .lane M . Quinlan Village Clerk :r t1 CITY OF BATAVIA 100 North Island Avemie, Batavia, Illinois 60510 Phone: (MO) 879- 1424 Fax: (630) 879-0710 1TA WILLIAM R. 1AcGRAI'I-1 IFITCKY D. SC'IiIJ;LICI City Administrator Mayor tLANDALL R. RECKLAUS Assistant City Administrator M. HANNAI I VOLK City Clerl: 70I-IN S. NOBLE, City Attorney To Whom It May Concern: c rY ° K eNEx ° March 16, 2005 On behalf of the City of Batavia I write this letter regarding the Onyx Waste Services. The contract under which controls the relationship with our waste company has very specific language regarding the service, which must be provided by the waste company. It has been said more than once by residence of our city that the feeling of Onyx as our waste hauler has been superior in service to our customers. More that one letter of note has been received complementing them on the job that they perform. Coming into our community and taking over the collect of solid waste from another company sounds lil.e a monumental task. The transition from one organization to another in our opinion went very smooth with little problems involved. Switching the type of collection stickers containers and bags went well when Onyx allowed a 30-day grace period from one company to another. Onyx also offered and provided three different types of wheeled carts available to the citizens at a monthly fee. This program was very successful for them and the number of these carts in the community has almost tripled since the begming of the contact. The City of Batavia's solid waste contact covers several facets of the waste stream and were detailed in part about our recycling program Onyx met our needs and them some by offering several routes to choose from in our program. Presently they are single streaming the collection of recycling and they collect a large variety of items, these are collected on P weekly basis. Along with this program large items and appliances are also collected to the cities satisfaction, It is our opinion that Onyx waste services has been living up to the terms of the contract and has offered the citizens of Batavia a well rounded service based company. There customer service attitude and action has in our opinion has been outstanding. We the City of Batavia would gladly recommend this company to any other municipality who might be interested in having Onyx bid for their solid waste contract. Robe Po P eck Administrative Assistant. t � iA ST. CHARLES s 1 N c r. 3 8 3 4 March 4, 2005 Mr. Edward A Patrone Onyx Waste Services 1210 Lye„ Road Batavia, Illinois 60510 Re: Refuse Service Dear Mr. Patrone: As you know, Onyx Waste Services has provided residential refuse and recycling services for the City of St. Charles for the previous three years. I am writing to express my appreciation for the excellent service you and your company have provided to our residents. Both the office staff and drivers have been very courteous and helpful when I have had occasion to speak with them. I have personally received a number of positive continents on the efficient services provided to us. The one-pass collection system for refuse and recyclables has worked very well, helping us to maintain a neat appearance throughout our city. Please extend my thanks to the rest of your staff for the commitment to service that you have extended to the City of St. Charles. 1. look forward our continued partnership and successes. Sincerely, Clifford L. White, Jr. Environmental Services Superintendent CLW/jj Susan L. KLINFIGIAMER Mayor LARRY W. MAHOLLAND City Adnzinisbalor Two EAST NIAIR STEER St CHARLES , IL 60174 - 1984 8i{ otlI : 630 - 377 - 4400 FAX : 630 377 4487 Chicagoland Veolia Municipal Contract References Village of Wilmette Village of Winnetka 1200 Wilmette Avenue 510 Green Bay Road Wilmette, IL 60091 Winnetka , IL 60093 847-251 -2700 847-501 -6000 frenzert @wilmette . com Ssaunders(Dwinnetka .org Tim Frenzer Steve Saunders Village Manager Director of Public Works • 8 , 500 Residential Units 4 , 000 Residential Units • 13 years of continuous service 11 years of continuous service • Once and twice per week back Once per week curbside pick up door or alley pick up Recyclables • Solid waste , recyclables and yardwaste CitV of Zion City of Waukegan 2828 Sheridan Road 106 North Utica Zion , IL 60099 Waukegan , IL 60085 847-746-4000 847-599-2500 RonC@zion . 11 . us Ray.Vukovich (a)ci .waukegan . il . us Ron Colangelo Tom Hagerty Director of Public Works Director of Public Works • 5 , 900 Residential Units • 19 , 000 Residential Units • 20 years of continuous service • 25 years of continuous service Once per week curbside pick up • Once per week curbside pick up • Solid waste, recyclables and • Solid waste , recyclables and • yardwaste yardwaste City of North Chicago Village of Round Lake Park Argonne Drive & Lewis Avenue 203 E Lake Shore Drive North Chicago, IL 60064 Round Lake Park, IL 60073 847-578-7750 847-546-2790 rlpmayor cr,sbcelobal.net Leon Rockingham Mayor Jean Mccue Mayor • 4 , 000 Residential Units • 10 years continuous service • 1 , 200 residential units Once per week curbside pick up • 9 years of continuous service • Solid waste, recyclables, and • Once per week curbside pick up yardwaste Solid waste , recyclables and yardwaste Village of Northbrook Village of Hainesville 1225 Cedar Lane 83-1 W Belvidere Road Northbrook , IL 60062 Hainesville, IL 847-272-5050 847-223-2032 nahrstadt(a) north brook . il us Iindasoto(o)hainesville . org Rich Nahrstadt Linda Soto Assistant Village Manager Mayor • 10 , 000 Residential Units • 700 residential units • 43 years of continuous service • 9 years continuous service • Once and twice per week • Once per week curbside pick up curbside and backdoor • Solid waste , recyclables and • Solid waste , recyclables and yardwaste yardwaste City of Highwood Village of Vernon Hills 17 Highwood Avenue 290 Evergreen Drive Highwood , IL 60040 Vernon Hills IL, 60061 847-432- 1924 847-945-5000 amarrin @cityofhighwood . org JohnK(@vhills . org Jon Kinseth John Kalmar Assistant City Manager Assistant Village Manager • 1 , 100 residential units . 6 , 500 residential units • 8 years of continuous service • 3 years of continuous service • Once per week pick up • Once per week curbside service • Solid waste, recyclables and . Solid waste, recyclables and yardwaste yardwaste Village of Deerfield City of St. Charles 850 Waukegan Road 2 East Main Street 847-945-50000 0 Deerfield , 60045 St. Charles IL , 60174 630-377-4405 rgallas(ostcharlesil .gov Kent Street Rich Gallas Village Manager Asst. Director of Public Works • 5 , 500 residential units • 12 , 000 residential units • 5 years of continuous service 3 years of continuous service • Once and twice per week . Once per week curbside service backdoor service Solid waste , recyclables and • Solid waste, recyclables and yardwaste yardwaste Village of Oak Lawn City of Batavia 9446 Raymond Drive 100 North Island Avenue Oak Lawn , Illinois 60453 Batavia IL , 60510 (708) 499-7739 630-879- 1424 iguinlan(a�oaklawn il .gov bill .cityofbatavia . net Jane Quinlan Bill McGrath Village Clerk City Administrator • 6 , 500 residential units • 15 , 000 residential units • 5 year contract • Began service May 1 , 2007 • Once per week service • Once per week curbside service • Solid waste, recyclables and • Solid waste, recyclables and yardwaste yardwaste City of Highland Park Village of Streamwood 1707 St. Johns Avenue Highland Park IL, 60035 301 E . Irving Park Road 847-432-0800 Streamwood , Illinois 60107 630-837-0200 Emily Palm Deputy City Manager Mary Johnson Director of Finance • 10, 000 residential units 2 years of continuous service • 13 , 000 residential units • Once and twice per week service • 5 year contract • Solid waste, recyclables and • Once per week service yardwaste Solid waste , recyclables and yardwaste City of Yorkville Village of Skokie (Commercial Franchise) 800 Game Farm Road 5127 W. Oakton Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Skokie, Illinois 60077 (630) 553-4350 (847) 933-8427 bolson6c yorkville. il . us max. slankard(c skokie .orq Bart Olsen Max Slankard City Administrator Public Works Director. 4500 residential units > 1 ,000 Businesses • 5 year contract . 7 year contract • Once per week service Various service levels • Solid waste, recyclables and Solid Waste , recycling (both "blue yardwaste bag and containerized) MillCreek Special Service Area City of Wheaton County of Kane 303 West Wesley 719 Batavia Road PO Box 727 Geneva , Illinois 60185 Wheaton , Illinois 60189-0727 (630) 208-3841 (630) 260-2033 recycleno,co. kane . il . us MDzugan wheaton . il . us Gary Milke Mike Dzugan Recycling Coordinator Asst. City Manager • 1 , 800 residential units • 15 , 000 residential units • 5 year contract 5 year contract • Once per week service Once per week service • Solid waste, recyclables and Solid waste, recyclables and yardwaste / D xe'w 4` i � ry � Y ■ eLC`' ��° / '. .,s s ✓ :""` ~<£Yfi r`2 e rls 4�ti � a > ?/ s 1rttT a\ Jy °�t3N'�"L� �� RC 5 t > . r . > / .,</ sarF .„3�s G `"t•"'4 ��s�1s.5,a, � s�� e .. 'sue �+ s','., 4� r� xT�Z,n� sw�sil s� �m^r s�, y � 2 a ^' sSt�a 5wi 1��.e, � sN •P ,N P?�,.i�� N. z _„ � �ti,..,. , f� 5r u';`n{ y 5 >��.r""�� ,�",�� NSA'� F � .a�. �'- ” � v e ^^ QA { 5`a' ✓l � � y � a l Y µ i � u I X 4om 3 t v vt( 4 kRX � W�fS4gF .,� R �,? r F ,w t a a z fi £, r .y s`Y .'� {�w ��a��i"�ti��1.. £ ��"�� z - �� 3� { al✓ T.1w 4y >> ;✓ <7 Y a es rG �s e / ,y . tiny E 3 ¢ /{ "?" ✓'"i,9e A �c.TSS',f p }S':4.�a SNP WG "✓�. s.,1. � Y� G �4�9��`�M`1< .� ti �.a.�a�.uSY�. v��, • • - . Loll ELON • - • • . s � �z��1 .JF� �` xi 9 �lT$ •.• m j�s41 4 �. y, P Waste Services Transportation_ of - - . • - • 11 : • • • - • 5 WE 1C • 11 : - 11 : • • '� 1 • • - - - • 111 • • - - • �.; �:�� k �� e2�Jh zC ��'C� ��t ` �"".rz''`4 F✓�3^H� �s �yz.�'� L`F.��x"`''YZ.1��'Z ��,� �'c�'� RM az zz` wyr,£,'+v„,�4Y�wrr - =� a�cr3 yvXa +>��.` S� 3 ,aa'�'ts"�,�i�"2a�2*,',s .v,, ✓/tc;Y�,3. 71a�` ;tr >�`?zzMCZk,J'c``�e''> u� . ;�r> u'`', ,.wP, ,. �za;"�vvzs � LWS e ' .?J11 1\l Eta trtY� 'l�' .v� C \`a� .�'^T✓�l'%'U^al°Yhhz��'��'��J;.,,2'�"��. � T'nra �',` `fv.,ly�' .:r'^ ",3 � �,�` a S'/ a 1M ! 9YI $ r v ztt � 'xSU» 3 � .., e { + '�s . , 4, . asa<✓� `3 .:s �.s �'�ii �c�- ; `+ 5 NOR 2� �. i° °f'S "@j`y> •,y��v' '„N�Z 1. r ' Veoha Environnement The Leader in the North American Market xz. i' ENE TRANSPORT W�ste ices IF �e rxlU Y' exs� a*m' 1' ssy^ryv i wy �� '3 ® e e • No. 1 in municipal *Top 1 -4 in various *Rapid growth in North •No.1 in multi-modal partnerships and categories of waste American market transportation provider industrial outsourcing management •Revenue: $450M in North America - •Revenue: $900M *Revenue: $2.21B •600 employees *Revenue: $1 .1B •3,600 employees 910,700 employees •17,000 employees • • MMUM b� ya I ' I • ' t tI ' . • i • • i - a �� x�b �� '�- .�., �� r k � �@i � z � ✓. S , . '^" >x c �9 s v >. . _ � Z.Z ,� r x �'�- � Z$' 4 Y R �.s`. zf�y 1)yY � �.. �t �� z�Ey�yti� t. •.. . :Ir " f , y 1 a,z��s a ��. W� i A �: � �; e, �1 P4e ' ,i t, � fi�3 ,..� �, xa zr�Y�' ��ad?�'y^�+� 2�i��v'�'x e��c��' � .�' �2;v�j,�`��'� �s p c u 4 S lyce 'r s t C s ),r x z s � `a b E° F i"^ yux"",�' x si �+i'z'_ �� .zli (� ��, \�2b}"'yi�� 'a" 'Y�'a:� r �`'�T�Pat �^y �y�' f. �� d `ZV,•3 �rK �+' `�� ✓ r�xS <'y�rs``Ay`ss'`k'i`ry i!Y� �f ca.> ?. ��S S� ` �Z � 3� 4 r�n�i��s�'�. �'s t`��'. , �. �f ��z � ;� ��''�:as,�'�Z�✓xtrs� ar�`�, x��., T tz� U� z c�'3��et ztiz NSc,z� ,�ZZ>J v�t��C*� w�,-��?. vv'�t2rx '"` iNS� Sys tip �t"�f}„�M`"` 1�." 'y$^>��ai x, C '�S'3 s � �'�'��3 ),Cyr � �� : �' y,�ti. N s cr✓ vf�y � S;,x .s :yC�Yx''� �r ',.�y�"t".,JS��'�.� ��'». �jS�,s��,,.� ,,�s,��' '�;X�:. i ""� F'� � «Y ` nkts;YVCYs�`npC h'�sv��`�`�:��,i�,�`��'pr��m�`�, ��`i' ��,"�� h � `�. x 3 � , � �� aS�`�j, �� „ � . ��, v��'?z��zz �G� z� � �h'r",.�C".'�.p�,, �, z � £ i4 ,;��1 r .fib a � 3 >f \��l � .p y �. - �' .� ' c t v WOO Ott vo PIP ' .aF4 °viCFY? Si?t4PTIC;°uL � ; � aun,�srrarnt Jx � �tr, a e N OR '< • �� ( � X, w , x • . as vote � �. .Y 'yic,S � Z� � e�a;Y.i� �4 }��,�c>=,z a ✓< ?�r�F /, E, > a� � S� �2�`eS�yr,?1ve�✓l+*.rt� c��ru� ��p�C�FTS�✓`�l � v�'��a'�.�� m •y �:3�\c �%,"r (e��'`a�` l)3Li�i3 A,ti�Y,�`��'U"'c�° rn,4ry��3��j<� �L'e� ~ ?t�'�� ')xa '3¢i e }�,``,, ��> ��'^✓inu�ti�� '�i4� %. °< �s� ,y��r �'a.:, �„xQF' �� '�'l��i xz s ,� W '�Fa<' ><< < �i� �t��r�. 3'� ,i ,% s 4<+4".3 sy �✓ fS 4 t . bs � Cr.' f`£Y �� g�,wrW� ,� te4"� �{5 � d .a , Z .,s(e� �i r?"`2" < �Gw t>.x„CS`.�3 `,ir�r � �h �+a' S» �Gyy u .�" � r a�r�1(„ �S �� er. <'� G 4�tu ✓5 f u ` �. Who Are We i wide ? Al We : are the fourth largest waste services firm in US ® Have 1 million residential . customers ® Collect 6 . 6 million tons annually ® Have 4 , 000 employees nationwide ` ' 0 Have 77 Hauling locations ` Own and/or operates : r ff�a3* ® 30 Landfills ` "�'" `' ® 16 Recycling Facilities We are local : The VESNA Corporate @ 40 Transfer Stations Offices are located on the 79th Floor of the Aon Building in Downtown Chicago office@ • 1 111 t *.' "r.. h vA z. a e t /n R yacr,� tea pti p(` gg a ,�'e '' 9l J "S^� 6+r FZtiti mwgg a�� '�`,$a��5 �.u?'z`'d>'S�' }}' �j`' '�'�Y��.�.,-'�r°�° '��`��S�t� -��a� � `A F. ss'y` BSs�,�z��,��``�� p"t2 ✓ � § " , � do ct 7 P • • ' • • �� OF A& r • • • • �, ail t �� ,E.yx� � e`�� : �`',a`' � u^3 i s 1' t.vS1 '``N "et,4. laa�'•'%' a'�` ws ^JF,i1' "'may f'�3 � � �e t � • • • • • � �L � ✓'� �� r'x�" t � rt:.� A� st��x� u a P�, � ris'^� t£ a sn. "yWKR� �; `aid'`'' Rik ✓r'v.'`tr �wsrt ; '7r rh 3kivf > -"✓ c2L 1br7X4' :'Y �5�. � ,. t2b\ '%''ry'-rv°`w '4*��x.. �.£F cck/"r-? t4s;. � ' - �dp'�tg do AD f 't��. rz;r ��q� k� vf > ,, , ew:v°� '�5 � �„ 4z sS�r 4✓ KY z L .yC Si`` sw'v.;* �'�,�c`�<�"`�s"u^!. `� �i "��;z�SAZ, ��y .� 5.� ° .ea oervice First® _ Safety Always ! Safety to you is our No 1 concern Our Drivers receive extensive safety � training throughout the company v1 Driver Cam - driver monitoring Y and testing _ Smith Training — continuous tw education on lifting and operating equipment Safety meetings and program awareness weekly Safety promotions and rewards Courteous and dedicated drivers ® Proactive approach to unsafe , conditions to preventing accidents before they happen World Class Customer Service for Yorkville and Oswego When you or your resident calls us � Live , local based service rep will assist you Complete knowledge about the rzr n a United City of Yorkville and the ti Village of Oswego , the refuse , " recycling , yard waste collection programs and the service expectations of the community 1 W * Customer Service reps and managers receive continuing training to ensure world class , � customer service * "One Call Does it All" Ago Nam Our service commitment to earl Our employees are dedicated to providing a consistent level of It Service Standards service excellence through Safety BAppearance We v r;rne tp to crourct nur CrisPoPipon Ano trip C. Or on the d s noroequd by the tto'ne . nni d E e ° . I be ci om with ioi- L sE e o ee." ® Safety and appearance " neon & ° , or° ed " '^`e ggg pg 1 O . ': ORI h ? - ' F pack ,J (A d. e3P SI IW CaJpc J pdd - 0OA34 y a�n Je ♦ al.eo Woe in h e a .earan :e or o venio es e:J n Our :D to to Vie rxe m^reO cy 1 1 sou, croal Service Delivery ° `" � A ' l. nec ag¢ ° ¢a h( °D e > >° <¢ Bet : S � n a - X Service Delivery ¢rancho- 13 I roe 4 me 0 r ° be toe d : er is Service communications v ¢ le or ,¢ D_ lM tlly rt O 'Otll G BNIeL 2 0 aid for ItraP 1 P rc µ an IsS . s WaC d D}' - p ..a i ro V C f V ere o nLNby ce aC[Lr ' 'le an .L Y) 'e:Gl Maa �TT' n , ro aPg150a he on ! q( b Ill CIt ran 01 es & sigS ONS I)C tl OIhPCICIor< ! (:fl o'T .'t t}dG'.. D IG z. - dr1.. .`EC aAf^2 %C\Lv.b " 5 (j ed One Call does it all . . . o D ere. Dee , CP P Do r 5 %v,R ina ohvoolii 'not 2 Onto nnno P it d0 e res s C:'. : e c ., all nPeJh el n <.e{ o s Communicating with Customers and Employees So you can focus on your eO Iho ° ¢ _ ,P aa° :�es na O ceo to be ye r; ed on e Jny srht 1110 o ar fe a p�uyea w dsa o rG o e o Dv c esoonse time O t on¢r Sery ce TPin I pro c¢ � Onn C'9I DDes I a: responsibilities "" a If he SCM¢c re"cord s mce orrcf DODO ationei to one '3DTP PI °. ¢ o ns the ritooce v,.H be oornuYteir Inv trib N be teotole I, air e e yd y won< on- I s to poor: p ¢ nn ,cre Pa race ocate the ^. c srre s v ce ent no 9nDIq C by !r l winDmer ib al an ._Oro 0 n . ' n n e %or F E%t M se;vce rertueso; ror w raa a co na . ' be ¢^ a oto to e°v m our er^p° e o t m combeted w folo,v s ¢ d tl reopen: a By e esl is rev e6beoe Y: have lotat connounicat*rt vollint and betAcen i . b by f rocuoM fi rnooveO alter veoAl co to ]..poor, curnorn ers tod o.ffQW.1oG10 oZ seM1 IX?. sS! <rn Gale. Jpaet2W7 rsrra ) k � nen,T �. - al, AN" • �' WT si� 3, I I • I �.wasm a 4 t � 4 f ms q yry�..,. r Ilt�.y4�;`R�, ¢a „ �Y <��,?�.�"T . `M�ny� ai✓ ..x Y� y y � ��'ss.S' � y;�,."�*�'L `��' `�:r"<yi> �3z�1 ,2' a<2 r ,e ' i ' • . r n Oggr o"� Rl'fr Gxv,�✓,3 �` ."G' Ga sszz�(�r�� '� .�1,�.a��`U�s� `�,a•�il�'�,tY. v yS�etSS� ) �y� z T�'✓ '�'y✓"� v.�.''�"S� t3"��, y sl r✓��< vl��x`?!'�µ `%y�f6��'3 �� jwu��v)(C�'w� ?�tJ`n �Sfg��v. � � S�✓;`�?, si�`,5�;� � ,Crr�st y�w y ��, .. ,<�r5-�3�s� �?5,,'��1 u'�F��1�� 3� �a.=ri fi��GIS��Fmw ��t& ��ye� �✓�� z+:J,W �2'am�� C't�bs!'., i�''��. �.'�1��s�- ° � i > v'a} ��"'�'�v,.� �,1+�,� t"�e� ��.^�, '`N`�� x�'�rc��'s" �^`i, er��l'�� t��j� *%n� 4�y�' � � � �'��'�,Zsri�&^✓l�^y� d'��`'y's ,��3 e i� �r .. 5.. � <zS J4`,'`�- f v y �i�t `�',w��.�,,,. � ..�'�i�-✓'fie ..�'r �� mac,F�'$5`' a � ' • • 1 111 • • • • • • ' L 2 t W' ar < � f `y vat � �vk"pt� L Y � ` �e., a f T�N�tP� � r� �� f�'�, ,,i�`✓F� 7�"�re��vl�a k`'S � k� . �..,,Iy��`a�t�,,,',,tiG•�'a�^ s `��i 4`e`w�rrxy's Yv zifN� i d;�7r``t�YSl"�,m,FSai�Z��c�"^�y��4h3��Mr,,rSQ `�iST�'S,s`L'2��5'u:'r�Z�7,'S�^Y.N`t�-'�K�c�'sysn., ts5u t s i 7 r`,x�t5 ✓Z cx.`�S W l<J 1S ��J 1r t, 3� § � t ti � k p�tSO'� c'W'£iF� `rJ �5`� �A\�' �A`��aFi?i��'��,�."'J,VaR}`p; .. ',`s'i 2js` Y pis ';; F ><rsp �<S `h Z. ��, o��Y µ,T - ';"21 �y sS f4,js � ,?. 'S.g✓a� ay�, u;�r 4'zY. ;�'U.X�e`!"�' s�a 3 - , i t � r .>� �'S�,fi�f'..xW�^,r��C`�Y�,pe �iy 71�'�,l'�2i lro��''s`a`4'/^'^.s � �'35.� 3ri'�.,�>yE , >d'�y' { ?.'ssxtu✓o4,, �t�ey�{� 'e� � . 3 1� �k:��u1A' f{T��.Z's�s•`�J''p y/�`*>P ✓�`v s � r. � � ,-��.z a :.. > e� Y.x a� t sr� INT"MON • - • • - • ' • - 111 • - - - • • - • ' • - 111 • - - - • • - • �'y�'`s r�� x✓��z�inc3ra rm��s �'`" f� �'iy `' �,s� a' �r..,"3�a � >. ,)'C kc `f`�ti'r -'� ✓ zl ,.e �.•ei�u' '�'� a ? rY; Fu .r r�+ ,�s .a niz1`s`� � eT "3 ui '" �ey� �'TS re�rAivt`� �l+v?'1.�/e `�rF �a+`J 43� vCs . �2.>>:�L.r y�zzK��✓;5�v < z. �� `eC�+� ^"`.,� i�`� 'K4 "4�"`w`��r�6�C"t`� �Dt�`7�� F 6 ( �` r � `�S v .�. WINEe' �` R �P i s . @ .. 9 , ka S • O n; � �`'�`yi"`� aF''1C71a 3 (v,,. beta7� ��,3�F�S52-:�S,U�w.�ti�lw}��4"��"�'J.•w �,�a�tia� �"�`s'��f� � Y�' c ��js�n�'3�*�'��" c.&yl�ti� ti�il��o '2&*�,��,"�s��s +yS,u'uY,> `� 13 fry Reviewed By: �� •s► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ Park Board#1 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ CC 2012-55 A ��' Police F-1 LE Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Park Board recommendations on REC Center and Referendum Questions Meeting and Date: City Council—July 24, 2012 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/A Council Action Requested: Informational item Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid 1s36 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: July 19, 2012 C<wrMY Sad Subject: Park Board recommendations on REC Center and referendum ALE questions Background The Park Board endorsed the following recommendations on the REC Center and referendum questions at their July 12th meeting. Park Board recommendations 1) We recommend the City buy the REC Center. 2) We recommend the City Council approve a binding referendum for the creation of a park district. If the City Council can not approve a binding referendum, we want a non-binding referendum. 3) We recommend a non-binding referendum on the REC Center purchase. 4) If either of the above recommendations are not accepted, we recommend a binding referendum for new construction. 5) We do not recommend a referendum for new construction that mentions a YMCA partnership. 6) We do not recommend two referendums that deal with construction and REC Center purchase on the same ballot. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 606 Legal ❑ PC #1 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ® Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ PC 2012-03 Police Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Indoor Gun Ranges/Shooting Galleries Zoning Text Amendment Meeting and Date: City Council —July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Request for Special Use in the Manufacturing & Business Zoning Districts for indoor Gun ranges/shooting galleries and to allow manufacturing of firearms in M-1 &M-2. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 7-11-12 Action Taken: Plan Commission recommendation Item Number: PC 2012-03 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum and draft ordinance. Clr� Memorandum 0 To: City Council �I From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director EST. ! 1836 CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator 1 --� Date: Junel7, 2012 Subject: PC 2012-03—Text Amendment to the Manufacturing &Business Districts to identify Indoor Shooting Gallery/Range as a Special Use & allow as a <I.E x' permitted use the manufacturing of fire arms &ammunition in the M Districts. Proposed Text Amendment: Staff is proposing to amend the zoning ordinance to identify indoor shooting galleries/gun ranges as special uses within the Manufacturing Districts (M-1 and M-2) and in the Business Districts (B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-4). This would allow for indoor practicing of target shooting open to the public within an enclosed building in both manufacturing and business districts. The manufacturing districts would be restricted to no more than 25% of the gross floor area dedicated to retail sales of firearms and associated products, while the business districts are not limited to floor area maximums for sales. Additionally, staff is requesting that the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing districts be allowed as a permitted use for the purposes manufacturing firearms and ammunition. Plan Commission Action: The Plan Commission reviewed the requested special use permit at a public hearing held on June 13, 2012 and continued its discussion at a meeting held July 11, 2012 and made the following action: Motion to recommend approval of the request for text amendment to Title 10, Chapter 7 Business Districts (Articles B-E) and Chapter 8, Article A M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and Article B M-2 General Manufacturing District of the United City of Yorkville's City Code, as presented by staff in memorandums dated May 3, 2012 and June 21, 2012, and further subject to the following: 1. Amend Title 10-8A-3 to identify "indoor shooting gallery/gun range" as a special use within the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and Title 10-813-3 of the M-2 General Manufacturing District. 2. Amend Title 10-2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance to include the following definition: Shooting Gallery/Gun Range, Indoor: an enclosed facility, public or private, specifically for the purpose of providing a place in which to discharge various types of firearms, shoot air guns and/or archery equipment at designated targets and designed to contain all projectiles fired within the confines of the building. Auxiliary training and instructional classroom facilities may also be provided, as well as ancillary retail sales of firearms, ammunition and associated products upon proof of applicable local, state and federal licensure. 3. Require a minimum building setback of fifty (50) feet from any property line for indoor shooting gallery/gun range facilities which abuts a residentially zoned property. 4. Require a minimum of two (2) parking spaces per firing lane; one (1) parking space per staff member; eight (8) parking spaces for each instructional classroom, if any; plus all other parking requirements for any associated office and/or retail use within or on the premises of an indoor shooting gallery/gun range. 5. Amend Titles 10-8A-1 and 10-813-1 to identify "manufacturing of firearms and ammunition"as a permitted use within the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing Districts. 6. Amend Title 10-2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance to include the following definitions: Manufacturer, Firearms and Ammunition: Any person or entity engaged in (A) the business of transporting, shipping and receiving firearms and ammunition for the purpose of sale or distribution (B) selling firearms at wholesale or retail, (C) repairing firearms or of making or fitting special barrels, stocks, or trigger mechanisms to firearms and operating under the provisions of the applicable local, state and federal licenses. 7. Require that retail operations in the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing Districts be ancillary to an indoor shooting gallery/gun range facility with no more than twenty-five percent(25%) of the total floor area. 8. Amend Titles 10-7-B-2 B-1 Limited Business District; 10-7C-2 B-2 General Business District; 10-7D-2 B-3 Service Business District; and 10-7E-2 B-4 Business District of the Zoning Ordinance to identify "indoor shooting gallery/gun range" as a special use within these districts. 9. Indoor shooting galleries/gun ranges located within Business Districts shall be an end- unit only with the gallery/range in a location where it is not adjacent to an adjoining unit. Action Item• Lindblom-aye; Weaver-aye; Prochaska-aye; Crouch-aye; Kraupner-aye; Adams-aye; Jones-aye. 7 ayes; 0 nays; 0 abstentions For your reference, staff has attached copies of the memorandums submitted to the Plan Commission regarding this request, as well as the minutes and transcript from the public hearing. Staff will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to address the City Council. Ordinance No. 2012- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE YORKVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR INDOOR SHOOTING RANGES AS SPECIAL USES AND FOR THE MANUFACTURING OF FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION AS A PERMITTED USE WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10-14-7 of the Yorkville Zoning Code the City may initiate amendments to the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS,the City filed seeking an amendment to the Yorkville Zoning Code to allow as special uses in the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and the M-2 General Manufacturing District indoor shooting gallery/gun ranges and the manufacturing of firearms and ammunition as a permitted use and to allow indoor shooting gallery/gun ranges as a special use in the B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-4 Business Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission convened and held a public hearing on the 13th day of June 2012, to consider the request to amend the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance adding the special use and permitted use as described above; and WHEREAS,the Plan Commission reviewed the standards as required in Section 10-14-7 of the Yorkville Zoning Code, , and made a recommendation to approve the proposed amendments to the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Plan Commission's recommendations and hereby approves said amendments to the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2. That Section 10-2-3, entitled "DEFINITIONS" of the Yorkville City Code, as amended,be and is hereby amended by adding the following definitions to read as follows: SHOOTING GALLERY/GUN RANGE, INDOOR: an enclosed facility, public or private, specifically for the purpose of providing a place in which to discharge various types of firearms, shoot air guns and/or archery equipment at designated targets and designed to contain all projectiles fired within the confines of the building. Auxiliary training and instructional classroom facilities may also be provided, as well as ancillary retail sales of firearms, ammunition and associated products upon proof of applicable local, state and federal licensure. Ordinance No.2012- Page 1 MANUFACTURER, FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION: Any person or entity in (A) the business of transporting, shipping and receiving firearms and ammunition for the purpose of sale or distribution (B) selling firearms at wholesale or retail, (C) repairing firearms or making or fitting special barrels, stocks or trigger mechanisms to firearms and operating under the provisions of the applicable local, state and federal licenses." Section 3. That Section 10-8A-3 and Section 10-813-3 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and is hereby amended by adding the following special use to read as follows: "Indoor shooting gallery/gun range with any accessory retail operations to occupy not more than twenty-five percent(25%) of the total floor area." Section 4. That Section 10-8A-4 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and is hereby amended by adding subsection C. read as follows: "C. The minimum building setback for indoor shooting gallery/gun range facilities shall be fifty(50) feet from any property line that abuts a residentially zoned property." Section 5. That Section 10-11-4, entitled "Schedule of Parking Requirements" of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and is hereby amended by adding subsection L. to read as follows: "L. Indoor shooting gallery/gun range. Two (2) parking spaces per firing lane; one (1) parking space per staff member; eight(8) parking spaces for each instructional classroom, if any; plus all other parking requirements for any associated office and/or retail use within or on the premises." Section 6 That Section 10-7B-2, Section 10-7C-2, Section 10-713-2 and Section 10-7E-2 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and is hereby amended by adding the following special use to read as follows: "Indoor shooting gallery/gun range that when located in a multiple tenant building shall only be located in an end-unit and with the gallery/range not adjacent to an adjoining unit." Section 7. That Section 10-713-4 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and is hereby amended by adding subsection E. read as follows: "E. The minimum building setback for indoor shooting gallery/gun range facilities shall be fifty(50) feet from any property line that abuts a residentially zoned property." Section 8. That Section 10-7C-4 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and is hereby amended by adding subsection E. read as follows: "E. The minimum building setback for indoor shooting gallery/gun range facilities shall be fifty(50) feet from any property line that abuts a residentially zoned property." Ordinance No.2012- Page 2 Section 9. That Section 10-7D-4 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and is hereby amended by adding subsection F. read as follows: "F. The minimum building setback for indoor shooting gallery/gun range facilities shall be fifty(50) feet from any property line that abuts a residentially zoned property." Section 10. That Section 10-8A-1 and Section 10-813-1 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and is hereby amended by adding the following permitted use to read as follows: "Manufacturer, firearms and ammunition" Section 11. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2012. MAYOR Ordinance No.2012- Page 3 Memorandum To: Plan Commission From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director EST. -� _`� Bess CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: June 21, 2012 Subject: Text Amendment to the M-1 & M-2 Manufacturing Districts to °. indentify Indoor Shooting Gallery/Range as a Special Use and allow <LE 'yv as a permitted use the Manufacturing of Firearms and Ammunition. Background: As proposed at the June 13th Plan Commission meeting, staff is seeking to identify the operation of an indoor shooting gallery/gun range as a special use within both the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing Districts. This would include the indoor practicing of target shooting open to the public within an enclosed building and offer ancillary retail sales of firearms and associated products. Currently, indoor shooting galleries are not permitted within any district of the City; however, the sale of firearms is permissible within sporting goods stores and pawn shops. Staff is proposing to define an "indoor shooting gallery/gun range" as "an enclosed facility, public or private, specifically for the purpose of providing a place in which to discharge various types of firearms, shoot air guns and/or archery equipment at designated targets and designed to contain all projectiles fired within the confines of the building. Auxiliary training and instructional classroom facilities may also be provided, as well as ancillary retail sales of firearms, ammunition and associated products upon proof of applicable local, state and federal licensure" and to establish a minimum building setback of fifty (50) feet from any property line for indoor shoot gallery/gun range facilities which abuts a residentially zoned property. Additionally, staff recommended a minimum of two (2) parking spaces per firing lane; one (1) parking space per staff member; eight (8) parking spaces for each instructional classroom, if any; plus all other parking requirements for any associated office and/or retail use within or on the premises of an indoor shooting gallery/gun range. Finally, with regard to the manufacturing of firearms and ammunition, staff proposes to amend the City's zoning ordinance to identify it as a permitted use within the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing Districts and define the a"firearms and ammunition manufacturer" as "any person or entity engaged in (A) the business of transporting, shipping and receiving firearms and ammunition for the purpose of sale or distribution (B) selling firearms at wholesale or retail, (C) repairing firearms or of making or fitting special barrels, stocks, or trigger mechanisms to firearms and operating under the provisions of the applicable local, state and federal licenses."These uses would be considered ancillary with the retail component of the facility be greater than no more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total floor area. Request for Special Use within the Business Districts: During last month's discussion of permitting indoor shooting galleries/gun ranges as special uses within the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and the M-2 General Manufacturing Districts, the Plan Commission requested staff to research and prepare language permitting this use as a special use within the business districts as well. The Plan Commission also requested that the 25%maximum limitation for retail as an ancillary use, as proposed in the manufacturing districts, for shooting galleries/gun ranges would not be applicable in the business districts. The thought behind this discussion centered on the fact that some large outfitter retail stores may have an ancillary gallery or range as part of their business model and the currently proposed amendment would preclude those uses from locating with the business districts. Upon researching the larger commercial retailers in the area, staff contacted the following outfitter stores: LOCATION ZONING DISTRICT AMENITIES C/132(RSC)Commercial-Special • Retail Sales Gurnee,Illinois Use for a Regional Shopping Center • Indoor Gun/Shooting (Gurnee Mills Mall) Range B-2 Community Retail District • Retail Sales Bass Pro Shop Bolingbrook,Illinois located within the Promenade . Indoor Archery Range Bolingbrook. East Peoria,Illinois Business District/Enterprise Zone • Retail Sales • Indoor Archery Range • Retail Sales • Indoor Archery Range Economic Development Area • Shooting classes offered Hoffman Estates Illinois District(Office District)as a PUD in conference room of Cabela's within the Prairie Stone Business facility,but no on-site Park/Enterprise Zone gun range.Training conducted at an off-site location. Planned Unit Development(PUD) Dick's Sporting Goods Yorkville,Illinois District Retail Sales Only While some of the larger outfitter retailers do have indoor shooting ranges or archery ranges as a supplementary use within their facilities, it is not a major component to their overall business model. The closet retail facility with a commercial zoning that offers such an amenity is the Bass Pro Shop in Gurnee Mills Mall. However, should a similar facility locate in the City of Yorkville under within a business district, the proposed amendment would provide a mechanism to allow the development as part of a Special Use approval. Finally, should these uses be allowed as special uses in the business district (note the O-Office District is not included), the Plan Commission should then consider if indoor shooting galleries/gun ranges are appropriate in strip retail developments where adjoining suites and office/commercial mix uses are present. If so, staff recommends the facility be an end-unit only with the gallery/range in a location where it is not adjacent to an adjoining unit. If not, staff proposes to only permit indoor shooting galleries/gun ranges in business districts to be within a single occupancy building. Staff Recommendation Summary: 1. Amend Title 10-8A-3 to identify"indoor shooting gallery/gun range" as a special use within the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and Title 10-8B-3 of the M-2 General Manufacturing District. 2. Amend Title 10-2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance to include the following definition: Shooting Gallery/Gun Range, Indoor: an enclosed facility, public or private, specifically for the purpose of providing a place in which to discharge various types of firearms, shoot air guns and/or archery equipment at designated targets and designed to contain all projectiles fired within the confines of the building. Auxiliary training and instructional classroom facilities may also be provided, as well as ancillary retail sales of firearms, ammunition and associated products upon proof of applicable local, state and federal licensure. 3. Require a minimum building setback of fifty(50) feet from any property line for indoor shooting gallery/gun range facilities which abuts a residentially zoned property. 4. Require a minimum of two (2) parking spaces per firing lane; one (1) parking space per staff member; eight (8) parking spaces for each instructional classroom, if any; plus all other parking requirements for any associated office and/or retail use within or on the premises of an indoor shooting gallery/gun range. 5. Amend Titles 10-8A-1 and 10-813-1 to identify "manufacturing of firearms and ammunition" as a permitted use within the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing Districts. 6. Amend Title 10-2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance to include the following definitions: Manufacturer,Firearms and Ammunition:Any person or entity engaged in (A) the business of transporting, shipping and receiving firearms and ammunition for the purpose of sale or distribution (B) selling firearms at wholesale or retail, (C) repairing firearms or of making or fitting special barrels, stocks, or trigger mechanisms to firearms and operating under the provisions of the applicable local, state and federal licenses. 7. Require that retail operations in the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing Districts be ancillary to an indoor shooting gallery/gun range facility with no more than twenty-five percent(25%) of the total floor area. 8. Amend Titles 10-7-B-2 B-1 Limited Business District; 10-7C-2 B-2 General Business District; 10-7D-2 B-3 Service Business District; and 10-7E-2 B-4 Business District of the Zoning Ordinance to identify"indoor shooting gallery/gun range" as a special use within these districts. 9. Indoor shooting galleries/gun ranges located within Business Districts shall be an end-unit only with the gallery/range in a location where it is not adjacent to an adjoining unit or 10. Indoor shooting galleries/gun ranges located within Business Districts shall be permitted only within a single occupancy building or structure. Staff will be available to answer any questions the Plan Commission may have regarding the proposed text amendment. Should the Plan Commission decide to recommend approval of the proposed text amendment, draft motion language has been prepared below for your convenience. Proposed Motion: In consideration of testimony presented during a Public Hearing on June 13, 2012 and discussions conducted at that meeting and at the July 11, 2012 meeting, the Plan Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request for text amendment to Title 10, Chapter 7 Business Districts (Articles B-E) and Chapter 8, Article M-1 Limited Manufacturing District andArticle B M-2 General Manufacturing District of the United City of Yorkville's City Code, as presented by staff in memorandums dated May 3, 2012 and June 21, 2012, and further subject to [insert any additional conditions of the Plan Commission]... Attachments: 1. Staff memorandum to Plan Commission dated May 3,2012. 2. Current Title,Chapter 7,Articles A-E,Business Districts of the United City of Yorkville's Municipal Zoning Ordinance. 3. 2012 Yorkville Zoning Map. 4. Current Title 10,Chapter 8,Article A.M-1 Limited Manufacturing District of the United City of Yorkville's Municipal Zoning Ordinance. 5. Current Title 10,Chapter 8,Article B.M-2 General Manufacturing District of the United City of Yorkville's Municipal Zoning Ordinance. 6. M-1 and M-2 Zoning District Maps. 7. Federal Firearms License(FFL)application information(U.S.Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives). 8. Copy of Public Notice. Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 5 ARTICLE B. B-1 LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT 10-713-1 : USES PERMITTED: All uses permitted in the O district. Antique sales. Apartments, single-family, located in business buildings'. Bakery - retail. Barbershop. Beauty shop. Bookstore. Cafeteria (diner). Camera shop. Church or other place of worship. Cigar, cigarette and tobacco store. Clothes - pressing and repair. Club - private indoor. Club - private outdoor. Community center. Dressmaker - seamstress. Drugstore. Florist sales. Fruit and vegetable market - retail. Gift shop. Grocery store - supermarket. Gymnasium. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 5 Health food store. Hobby shop. Hospital (general). Hospital or treatment center. Household furnishing shop. Ice cream shop. Jewelry - retail. Laundry, cleaning and dyeing - retail. Library. Magazine and newsstand. Meat market. Medical clinic. Mortuary - funeral home. Park. Photography studio. Playground. Post office. Professional building. Recreation center. Restaurant. Shoe and hat repair. Substation. Swimming pool - indoor. Tennis club - private or daily fee. Trailer. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. 1994 Code; Ord. 1994-1A, 2-10-1994; Ord. 2003- 41, 7-22-2003) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 5 10-713-2: SPECIAL USES: A. Allowed: All special uses permitted in O district. Liquor store. Microbreweries/brewpubs, where if off premises consumption is allowed, all sales must be in a hand capped, sealed container with a total maximum production of fifteen thousand (15,000) barrels per calendar year inclusive of on premises and off premises sales. Microbrewery/brewpub operations will be ancillary to a restaurant or eating establishment, and the brewing component of the facility shall not be more than twenty five percent (25%) of the total floor area. Tavern - nightclub. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. Ord. 1978-10, 9-28-1978; Ord. 2010-37, 7-13-2010) B. Prohibited: Daycare centers. (Ord. 1995-20, 8-10-1995) 10-713-3: LOT AREA: No lot shall have an area less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28 -1974) 10-713-4: YARD AREAS: No building shall be erected or enlarged unless the following yards are provided and maintained in connection with such building, structure or enlargement: A. Front Yard: A front yard of not less than thirty feet (30'). (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) B. Side Yards: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 4 of 5 1. A minimum side yard shall be required between buildings within the B-1 district of twenty feet (20') between a building constructed thereon and the side lot line, except in any existing B-1 zoning district within the corporate boundaries where no minimum side yard shall be required between buildings, except where a side yard adjoins a street, wherein a minimum side yard of not less than twenty feet (20') shall be required. 2. The zoning board of appeals may, upon application, grant a variance to any petitioner seeking to vary the side yard requirements in a B-1 district if the variance is sought for a parcel of real estate that is sought to be developed as a planned unit development because of the unique nature of the parcel or development sought thereon. (Ord. 1986 -1, 1-9-1986; amd. 1994 Code) C. Rear Yard: A rear yard of not less than twenty feet (20'). (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) D. Transitional Yards: Where a side or rear lot line coincides with a residential district zone, a yard of not less than twenty feet (20') shall be required. A transitional yard shall be maintained only when the adjoining residential district is zoned R-1 or R-2 one-family residential. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. Ord. 1987-1, 2-12-1987) 10-713-5: LOT COVERAGE: Not more than fifty percent (50%) of the area of the zoning lot may be occupied by buildings and structures, including accessory buildings. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) 10-713-6: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: A. No building or structure shall be erected or altered to exceed a maximum height of six (6) stories or eighty feet (80'), whichever is lower. B. No building or structure shall be erected or altered to exceed a maximum height of three (3) stories or thirty five feet (35) within the "downtown area" as described by exhibit A, attached to the ordinance codified herein. (Ord. 2006-67, 8-8-2006) 10-713-7: OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 5 of 5 All in accordance with regulations set forth in chapter 11 of this title. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28- 1974) 10-713-8: SINGLE-FAMILY APARTMENTS IN BUSINESS BUILDINGS: A. Buildings To Comply With BOCA Code: Apartments may be on any floor of a business building, in conformance with BOCA code. B. Containment Within Business Building: Said apartment must be contained in the business building and not exist separate and apart from the building. C. Number Of Apartments: In the case of a business which contains more than one apartment on a second floor above a first floor business, said business is allowed to have two (2) apartments maximum. D. Conflicting Provisions Repealed: 1. Any and all zoning ordinances which prohibit apartments in property zoned for business are hereby specifically revoked. 2. This amendment shall replace any ordinance which prohibits apartments in property zoned for business. (Ord. 1994-1A, 2-10-1994) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 5 ARTICLE C. B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 10-7C-1 : USES PERMITTED: All uses permitted in the O and B-1 Districts. Appliances - sales. Army/Navy surplus sales. Art gallery - art studio sales. Art supply store. Auditorium. Automatic food service. Automobile accessory store. Automobile rental. Bicycle shop. Billiard parlor. Blueprint and photostat shop. Bowling alley. Carry-out food service. Catalog sales office. Clothing store - all types. Dance hall. Department store. Discount store. Drygoods store - retail. Floor covering sales. Furniture sales - new/used. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 5 Hardware store. Health club or gymnasium. Hotel. Interior decorating studio. Junior department store. Leather goods. Locksmith. Motel. Music, instrument and record store. Newspaper publishing. Office equipment and supply sales. Paint/wallpaper store. Pawnshop. Personal loan agency. Pet store. Picture frame store. Radio and television studios. Reducing salon, masseur and steam bath. Sporting goods. Stationery. Taxidermist. Theater. Toy store. Typewriter; sales and repair. Variety store. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 5 Watch and clock sales and repair. Weaving and mending; custom. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. 1994 Code) 10-7C-2: SPECIAL USES: All special uses permitted in the B-1 district. Apartments, single-family, located in business buildings!. Gasoline service station. Marina. Off track betting (OTB) facility. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. Ord. 1994-1 A, 2-10-1994; Ord. 2010-58, 12-14-2010) 10-7C-3: LOT AREA: No lot shall have an area less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet. (Ord. 1986-1, 1-9- 1986) 10-7C-4: YARD AREAS: No building shall be erected or enlarged unless the following yards are provided and maintained in connection with such building, structure or enlargement: A. Front Yard: No minimum front yard shall be required. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) B. Side Yards: 1. A minimum side yard shall be required between buildings within the B-2 district of twenty feet (20') between a building constructed thereon and the side lot line, except in any existing B-2 zoning district within the corporate boundaries where no minimum side yard shall be required between buildings, except where a side yard adjoins a street, wherein a minimum side yard of not less than thirty feet (30') shall be required. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 4 of 5 2. The zoning board of appeals may, upon application, grant a variance to any petitioner seeking to vary the side yard requirements in a B-2 district if the variance is sought for a parcel of real estate that is sought to be developed as a planned unit development because of the unique nature of the parcel or development sought thereon. (Ord. 1986 -1, 1-9-1986; amd. 1994 Code) C. Rear Yard: A rear yard of not less than twenty feet (20'). (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) D. Transitional Yards: Where a side or rear lot line coincides with a residential district zone, a yard of not less than thirty feet (30') shall be required. A transitional yard shall be maintained only when the adjoining residential district is zoned R-1 or R-2 one-family residential. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. Ord. 1987-1, 2-12-1987) 10-7C-5: LOT COVERAGE: Not more than eighty percent (80%) of the area of the zoning lot may be occupied by buildings and structures, including accessory buildings. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) 10-7C-6: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: A. No building or structure shall be erected or altered to exceed a maximum height of six (6) stories or eighty feet (80'), whichever is lower. B. No building or structure shall be erected or altered to exceed a maximum height of three (3) stories or thirty five feet (35') within the "downtown area" as described by exhibit A, attached to the ordinance codified herein. (Ord. 2006-67, 8-8-2006) 10-7C-7: OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING: All in accordance with regulations set forth in chapter 11 of this title. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28- 1974) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 5 of 5 http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 4 ARTICLE D. B-3 SERVICE BUSINESS DISTRICT 10-7D-1 : PERMITTED USES: All uses permitted in the B-2 district. Agricultural implement sales and service. Appliance - service only. Automotive sales and service. Boat sales. Building material sales. Business machine repair. Car wash without mechanical repair on the premises. Catering service. Drive-in restaurant. Electrical equipment sales. Feed and grain sales. Frozen food locker. Furniture repair and refinishing. Golf driving range. Greenhouse. Kennel. Miniature golf. Motorcycle sales and service. Nursery. Orchard. Park - commercial recreation. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 4 Plumbing supplies and fixture sales. Pump sales. Recreational vehicle sales and service. Skating rink. Sports arena. Taxicab garage. Tennis court - indoor. Trailer rental. Truck rental. Truck sales and service. Upholstery shop. Veterinary clinic. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. Ord. 1986-1, 1-9-1986; Ord. 1988-7, 4- 14-1988; Ord. 1995-19, 8-10-1995; Ord. 1998-21, 6-25-1998; Ord. 2005-58, 7-12-2005) 10-7D-2: SPECIAL USES: A. Allowed: All special uses permitted in the B-2 district. Amusement park. Boat launching ramp. Boat rental and storage. Daycare centers. Stadium. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 4 B. Prohibited: Off track betting (OTB) facility. (Ord. 2010-58, 12-14-2010) 10-7D-3: LOT AREA: No lot shall have an area less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet. (Ord. 1986-1, 1-9- 1986) 10-7D-4: YARD AREAS: No building shall be erected or enlarged unless the following yards are provided and maintained in connection with such building, structure or enlargement: A. Front Yard: A front yard of not less than fifty feet (50'). (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) B. Side Yards: 1. A minimum side yard shall be required between buildings within the B-3 district of twenty feet (20') between a building constructed thereon and the side lot line, except in any existing B-3 zoning district within the corporate boundaries where no minimum side yard shall be required between buildings, except where a side yard adjoins a street, wherein a minimum yard of not less than thirty feet (30') shall be required. 2. The zoning board of appeals may, upon application, grant a variance to any petitioner seeking to vary the side yard requirements in a B-3 district if the variance is sought for a parcel of real estate that is sought to be developed as a planned unit development because of the unique nature of the parcel or development sought thereon. (Ord. 1986 -1, 1-9-1986; amd. 1994 Code) C. Rear Yard: A rear yard of not less than twenty feet (20'). (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) D. Transitional Yards: Where a side or rear lot line coincides with a residential district zone, a yard of not less than thirty feet (30') shall be required. A transitional yard shall be maintained only when the adjoining residential district is zoned R-1 or R-2 one-family residential. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. Ord. 1987-1, 2-12-1987) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 4 of 4 E. Parking Lot Setback Requirements: 1. Arterial Roadways: When a parking lot located in the B-3 zoning district is located next to an arterial roadway, as defined in the city's comprehensive plan, a twenty foot (20') setback from the property line is required. 2. Nonarterial Roadways: When a parking lot located in the B-3 zoning district is located next to a nonarterial roadway, as defined in the city's comprehensive plan, a ten foot (10') setback from the property line is required. (Ord. 1998-32, 11-5-1998) 10-713-5: LOT COVERAGE: No more than fifty percent (50%) of the area of the zoning lot may be occupied by buildings and structures, including accessory buildings. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) 10-7D-6: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: A. No building or structure shall be erected or altered to exceed a maximum height of six (6) stories or eighty feet (80'), whichever is lower. B. No building or structure shall be erected or altered to exceed a maximum height of three (3) stories or thirty five feet (35) within the "downtown area" as described by exhibit A, attached to the ordinance codified herein. (Ord. 2006-67, 8-8-2006) 10-7D-7: OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING: All in accordance with regulations set forth in chapter 11 of this title. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28- 1974) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 2 ARTICLE E. B-4 BUSINESS DISTRICT 10-7E-1 : USES PERMITTED: All uses permitted in the B-3 district. Auction house. Garage; bus or truck. Utility company maintenance yard. Utility service yard or garage. (Ord. 1986-1, 1-9-1986; amd. 1994 Code; Ord. 1998-21, 6-25- 1998) 10-7E-2: SPECIAL USES: A. Allowed: All uses permitted in the B-3 district. (1994 Code) B. Prohibited: Daycare centers. Off track betting (OTB) facility. Stadiums. (Ord. 1995-19, 8-10-1995; amd. Ord. 1995-20, 8-10-1995; Ord. 2010-58, 12- 14-2010) 10-7E-3: LOT AREA: Same as in the B-3 district. (Ord. 1986-1, 1-9-1986) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 1/31/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 2 10-7E-4: YARD AREAS: Same as in the B-3 district. (Ord. 1986-1, 1-9-1986) 10-7E-5: LOT COVERAGE: Same as in the B-3 district. (Ord. 1986-1, 1-9-1986) 10-7E-6: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: Same as in the B-3 district. (Ord. 1986-1, 1-9-1986) 10-7E-7: OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING: All in accordance with regulations set forth in chapter 11 of this title. (Ord. 1986-1, 1-9-1986) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 1/31/2012 - \, —,./ Fir, �,�:: /�:❖`�l�.I�_�=� `"" • ` 1. I , - ............... .............. =+ 17 ............ KNIM m szi �!! ■1r Elio i�5 02- ■ MOM r■ unr '111111\ .;��''" `U I nl• .J Q V IIr� � � i LISM-1 NEI ON Ing MR. w M 114"i" I NO,001 -z- F, 416. 2411 won, ,o M KA 41K. SIR! IF,- ■10 �.:J� �,cr, �►♦♦�;�bl•Iq. H PR V,prj gg!4 grpr e-0 PIN MAII, I've I -1111104% r ,I se Atli ♦:O,O , WOMEN :\ / i ■■�■ mm„ — ♦. 1• 1111 �` • M I IIIIIIIIII �`' ii.•p4•rl�f, ,1 �.. '�� R �i ��, •�•1�1+►��.w:•j 7- fAR 110IME R, N NEI MWE a� ! ��+'��_ •i��T� ; Vii+ ”" - �� T �a PIP X: IMIR I A 111 -Zi Ir��♦ 1{ i•�.� �� \ —�. - m �� _•r . , �`��i 11��OVA IM,AN Legend RiversiStreams Lo-al Parks/Forest Preserves city Forest Preserve State 9 F-1-Floodplain District A-1-Agricultural District E-1-Estate Residence District R-1-One Familiy Residence District �■�■ !!Ilr�!1 i ---- R-21)-Duplex Two Family District R-3-General Residence District 1 1.5 2 IN R-4-General Residence District MI.. !Niiiiiiiiia IN PUD-Planned Unit Development � ■! 0-Office District B-1-Limited Business District B-2-General Business District B-3-Service Business District United City of Yorkville United City of IN B-4-Business District n�.....--...Th—ft.dCHy.fCP Yorkville GiS ri M-1-Limited Manufacturing District P�rc.idM.p�Wd.dby�.d.IIC.u.tyG[S 2012 Zoning Map M-2-General Manufacturinq District �M ApH201 Memorandum To: Plan Commission From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director EST. -� _`� tess CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator .� Date: May 3, 2012 Subject: Text Amendment to the M-1 & M-2 Manufacturing Districts to °. indentify Indoor Shooting Gallery/Range as a Special Use and allow <LE 'yv as a permitted use the Manufacturing of Firearms and Ammunition. Special Use for Indoor Shooting Gallery/Ranee Request: As proposed, the operation of an indoor shooting gallery/gun range would be allowed as a special use within both the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing Districts. This would include the indoor practicing of target shooting open to the public within an enclosed building and offer ancillary retail sales of firearms and associated products. Currently, indoor shooting galleries are not permitted within any district of the City; however, the sale of firearms is permissible within sporting goods stores and pawn shops. The zoning ordinance would be amended to define an "indoor shooting gallery/gun range" as follows: Shooting Gallery/Gun Range, Indoor: an enclosed facility, public or private, specifically for the purpose of providing a place in which to discharge various types of firearms, shoot air guns and/or archery equipment at designated targets and designed to contain all projectiles fired within the confines of the building. Auxiliary training and instructional classroom facilities may also be provided, as well as ancillary retail sales of firearms, ammunition and associated products upon proof of applicable local, state and federal licensure.1 The M-1 and M-2 Manufacturing districts in the city's zoning ordinance are intended to regulate the production, processing, cleaning, servicing, testing or repair of products, as well as the storage of materials, goods or products which conforms to the performance standards established for the districts. Although an indoor shooting gallery/gun range may broadly fall under the "testing of products" use, identifying and defining it as a special use in the manufacturing districts allows the city more discretion on a case-by-case basis of where each facility will be located and operated. Zoning/Land Use The bulk requirements for the M-1 and M-2 Manufacturing Districts are as follows: Yard Areas Lot Coverage Floor Area Ratio Front: Min. 25 ft. M-1 Limited Manufacturing Side: Min. 10% of lot Max. 60%of the lot area Max. 0.8 District width/Max. 20 ft. Front: Min. 25 ft. M-2 General Manufacturing o Max. 0.85 District Side: Min. 10% of lot Max. 60%of the lot area width/Max.20 ft. Currently, there are nearly 100 parcels within the M-1 and M-2 zoning districts within the City of Yorkville, a majority of which are located in the Fox Industrial Park and the Yorkville Business 1 Definition derived,in part,from the National Rifle Association(NRA) The Range Source Book—A Guide to Planning and Construction and the U.S.Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco,Firearms and Explosives(ATF)Federal Firearms Regulations Reference Guide 2005. 2 However, where lots within the same block and comprising 40% of frontage on the same street are already developed with an average depth of less than 25 feet,then such average depth shall be the required front yard depth for such frontage in said block(Section 10-8A-4 of the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance). Center. The attached map illustrates the M-1 and M-2 districts within the City that may be affected by the proposed text amendment. Aside from the required yard setbacks, there are no provisions within the zoning code regulating the minimum distance between an enclosed building in a manufacturing district and a residentially zoned property. Therefore, staff is also proposing to establish a minimum building setback of fifty (50) feet from any property line for indoor shoot gallery/gun range facilities which abuts a residentially zoned property. This restriction with regards to proximity of adjacent homes will provide an appropriate buffer between the differing land uses and address any perceived noise and safety(i.e. projectiles penetrating walls) concerns. Facility Design Considerations According to the National Rifle Association (NRA), a typical indoor shooting gallery is designed with four (4) main construction considerations: shooter needs, type of shooting activity to be conducted, number of firing points and the number of users anticipated. Building design industry standards estimate an indoor firing range consisting of eight (8) firing lanes will utilize approximately 6,000 square feet of tenant space. The following diagrams are representative of typical tenant plans for an indoor gun range.3 Lead Dust Ewawaton Anr Plenum Wall Target System System F,o a Lanes 4 'as CL d. s=rw,n Firing Range, pace Type ,0-0 20, - 40-0 Leas!I}tr911 tY �w aell� tie eer11 cyst" To meet, 7.4 e TargeC SyS.i�m° i '9-0' Gontral Firing Lanes • �' Air Plenum VM1 ShWwlg$oTashs gutie!Trap Firing Range Section Parking Regulations Off-street parking requirements should also be considered for indoor shooting gallery/gun range facilities, as they are a unique user category and may not be adequately addressed in Section 10-11-4 Schedule of Parking Requirements in the City's Zoning Ordinance. According to staff research and the American Planning Association (APA) Planning Advisory Service 2002 Parking Standards manual, an indoor shooting range should have a minimum of one (1) parking space per firing lane and one (1) space per staff member. These parking standards are in addition to any required parking for auxiliary training classrooms and ancillary retail area. 3Source:Whole Building Design Guide(WBDG)a program of the National Institute of Building Sciences www.wbdg.or /g desi firingtrange.php. Based upon the APA's recommendation and discussions with other area planners regarding the popularity of such uses, staff recommends a minimum of two (2) parking spaces per firing lane; one (1) parking space per staff member; eight (8) parking spaces for each instructional classroom, if any; plus all other parking requirements for any associated office and/or retail use within or on the premises of an indoor shooting gallery/gun range. Other Departmental/Agency Considerations Police The proposed text amendment is not contradictory to Section 5-3-6: Weapons; Air Rifles under Police Regulations of the City Code which states "[n]o person shall fire or discharge any gun, pistol or other firearm within the limits of the city except upon the premises used by a duly a licensed shooting gallery, a gun club or a rifle club, or upon prior application to the chief of police on the city and prior written approval by the said chief of police; and provided further, that the provisions of this section shall not apply to the discharge of firearms by police or other officers in the discharge of their duties." Building Any proposed shooting gallery/gun range will need to meet the current building code standards adopted by the city. The 2009 International Building Code (IBC) would classify this type of use as a Storage Group S and an incidental use in the Assembly (A), Business (B), Educational (E), Industrial (1), Manufacturing (M) or Residential (R) occupancy groups requiring fire sprinklers and separation from other occupancies by a minimum 2-hour fire wall (partition). Particular consideration will be given to the following operational systems: (1) ventilation — indoor ranges may contain elevated levels of airborne lead which can be a potential threat to the health of those working in or patronizing the facility. Specific guidelines for supply and exhaust systems for indoor ranges are provided for in the 2009 IBC; (2) construction—specific materials are required in the construction of side walls, baffles, bullet traps, overhead containment and other areas where a projectile can impact or ricochet in an indoor shooting range; (3) noise —recommended maximum noise levels permitted for an indoor shooting range is 85 decibels to ensure the ability for communication between the shooters and range officials, as well as mitigate excessive noise to surrounding properties; and finally (4) lighting — special energy efficient fluorescent light fixtures are required to be used in indoor shooting ranges to create ambient and targeted lighting, minimizing glare on wall surfaces. Fire District The Bristol Kendall Fire District will enforce the city's adopted 2009 International Fire Code (IFC) when reviewing plans and inspecting any proposed indoor shooting gallery/gun range facilities, should the text amendment be approved. As mentioned previously, all such uses will be required to be fire sprinkled and provide a fire detection device. Manufacturing of Firearms &Ammunition in M-1 &M-2 Districts: For the purposes of allowing the transport, shipping and receiving firearms and ammunition as well as the repairing, making or fitting special barrels, stocks or trigger mechanisms to firearms within the manufacturing districts, staff proposes to amend the City's zoning ordinance to define and identify "manufacturing of firearms and ammunition" as a permitted use with the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing Districts. The following proposed new definition would also be added in the zoning ordinance: Manufacturer, Firearms and Ammunition: Any person or entity engaged in (A) the business of transporting, shipping and receiving firearms and ammunition for the purpose of sale or distribution (B) selling firearms at wholesale or retail, (C) repairing firearms or of making or fitting special barrels, stocks, or trigger mechanisms to firearms and operating under the provisions of the applicable local, state and federal licenses.¢ As with any manufacturer of firearms and/or ammunition, a federal license issued by the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is required. A copy of application information for Federal Firearms License (FFL)has been attached for your reference. Finally, since it is envisioned that sale of firearms and ammunition will be ancillary to the indoor shooting gallery/gun range use, staff proposes that the retail component of the facility be no more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total floor area. This will ensure that the majority of the space is used for manufacturing purposes and not merely as a gun shop. Other Communities: Staff has queried local communities to determine if and how shooting galleries/gun ranges or similar type uses are permitted and regulated within their respective zoning ordinances. The following table provides information about how each surveyed community identifies shooting galleries and/or gun ranges, how they are classified, and the zoning district which they are allowed. This should serve as a guide for the Plan Commission as to how Yorkville's proposed text amendment to allow indoor shooting galleries/gun ranges in the manufacturing districts might compare to nearby communities. Community Identified Use(s) Permitted or Zoning District(s)Allowed Special Use Indoor Target Practice Special Use A-1,B-Districts,M-1,M-2 Kendall County Outdoor Target Practice Special Use M-1,M-2 Outdoor Commercial Sporting Activities Special Use A-1 North Aurora Unspecified Uses Special Use I-2 Montgomery Indoor Gun Range Special Use M-1 Manufacturing of Ammunition Permitted M-1,M-2 Practice Pistol&Rifle Ranges, Skeet or Sugar Grove Trap Shooting Special Use A-1 Gun Assembly Permitted Use M-1 Oswego Recreational/Training Use Special Use B-2,B-3,M-1, M-2 Production of Firearms and Equipment Permitted Use M-1 Staff Recommendation Summary: 1. Amend Title 10-8A-3 to identify"indoor shooting gallery/gun range" as a special use within the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and Title 10-8B-3 of the M-2 General Manufacturing District. 2. Amend Title 10-2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance to include the following definition: Shooting Gallery/Gun Range, Indoor: an enclosed facility, public or private, specifically for the purpose of providing a place in which to discharge various types of firearms, shoot air guns and/or archery equipment at designated targets and designed to contain all projectiles fired within the confines of the building. Auxiliary training and instructional classroom facilities may 4 Definition derived,in part,from Section 478.41 (B)of the United States Gun Control Act. htt2://www.atf.aov/publications/download/T/atf-p-5300-4.pdf also be provided, as well as ancillary retail sales of firearms, ammunition and associated products upon proof of applicable local, state and federal licensure. 3. Require a minimum building setback of fifty (50) feet from any property line for indoor shoot gallery/gun range facilities which abuts a residentially zoned property. 4. Require a minimum of two (2) parking spaces per firing lane; one (1) parking space per staff member; eight (8) parking spaces for each instructional classroom, if any; plus all other parking requirements for any associated office and/or retail use within or on the premises of an indoor shooting gallery/gun range. 5. Amend Titles 10-8A-1 and 10-8B-1 to identify "manufacturing of firearms and ammunition" as a permitted use within the M-1 Limited Manufacturing and M-2 General Manufacturing Districts. 6. Amend Title 10-2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance to include the following definitions: Manufacturer,Firearms and Ammunition:Any person or entity engaged in (A) the business of transporting, shipping and receiving firearms and ammunition for the purpose of sale or distribution (B) selling firearms at wholesale or retail, (C) repairing firearms or of making or fitting special barrels, stocks, or trigger mechanisms to firearms and operating under the provisions of the applicable local, state and federal licenses. 7. Require that retail operations be ancillary to an indoor shooting gallery/gun range facility with no more than twenty-five percent(25%) of the total floor area. Staff will be available to answer any questions the Plan Commission may have regarding the proposed text amendment. Should the Plan Commission decide to recommend approval of the proposed text amendment, draft motion language has been prepared below for your convenience. Proposed Motion: In consideration of testimony presented during a Public Hearing on May 9, 2012 and approval of the amended findings of fact, the Plan Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request for text amendment to Title 10, Chapter 8, Article A M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and Article B M-2 General Manufacturing District of the United City of Yorkville's City Code, as presented by staff in a memorandum dated May 3, 2012, and further subject to {insert any additional conditions of the Plan Commission]... Attachments: 1. Current Title 10, Chapter 8,Article A. M-1 Limited Manufacturing District of the United City of Yorkville's Municipal Zoning Ordinance. 2. Current Title 10, Chapter 8,Article B. M-2 General Manufacturing District of the United City of Yorkville's Municipal Zoning Ordinance. 3. M-1 and M-2 Zoning District Maps. 4. Federal Firearms License(FFL)application information (U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,Firearms and Explosives). 5. Copy of Public Notice. Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 8 ARTICLE A. M-1 LIMITED MANUFACTURING DISTRICT 10-8A-1 : USES PERMITTED: The following uses are permitted: A. Production, processing, cleaning, testing or repair, limited to the following uses and products: Advertising displays. Apparel and other products manufactured from textiles. Art needlework and handweaving. Automobile painting, upholstering, repairing, reconditioning and body and fender repairing, when done within the confines of a structure. Awnings, venetian blinds. Bakeries. Beverages - alcoholic, with a total amount produced by any one manufacturer limited to a maximum of fifteen thousand (15,000) barrels (465,000 gallons) per calendar year. Beverages - nonalcoholic. Books - hand binding and tooling. Bottling works. Brushes and brooms. Cameras and other photographic equipment and supplies. Canning and preserving. Canvas and canvas products. Carpet and rug cleaning. Ceramic products - such as pottery and small glazed tile. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 10/11/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 8 Cleaning and dyeing establishments when employing facilities for handling more than one thousand five hundred (1,500) pounds of dry goods per day. Clothing. Contractor offices (with or without indoor storage). Cosmetics and toiletries. Creameries and dairies. Dentures. Drugs. Electrical appliances, such as lighting fixtures, irons, fans, toasters and electric toys. Electrical equipment assembly, such as home radio and television receivers and home movie equipment, but not including electrical machinery. Electrical supplies, manufacturing and assembly of such wire and cable assembly switches, lamps, insulation and dry cell batteries. Food products, processing and combining of (except meat and fish) - baking, boiling, canning, cooking, dehydrating, freezing, frying, grinding, mixing and pressing. Fur goods, not including tanning and dyeing. Glass products from previously manufactured glass. Hair, felt and feather products (except washing, curing and dyeing). Hat bodies of fur and wool felt. Heavy machinery and equipment rental business. Hosiery. House trailers, manufacture. Ice, natural. Ink mixing and packaging and inked ribbons. Jewelry. Laboratories - medical, dental, research, experimental, and testing - provided there is no danger from fire or explosion nor offensive noise, vibration, smoke, dust, odors, heat, glare or other objectionable influences. Laundries. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 10/11/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 8 Leather products, including shoes and machine belting, but not including tanning and dyeing. Luggage. Machine shops for tool, die and pattern making. Metal finishing, plating, grinding, sharpening, polishing, cleaning, rustproofing and heat treatment. Metal stamping and extrusion of small products, such as costume jewelry, pins and needles, razor blades, bottle caps, buttons and kitchen utensils. Musical instruments. Orthopedic and medical appliances, such as artificial limbs, braces, supports and stretchers. Paper products, small, such as envelopes and stationery, bags, boxes, tubes and wallpaper printing. Perfumes and cosmetics. Pharmaceutical products. Plastic products, but not including the manufacturing of the raw materials. Precision instruments such as optical, medical and drafting. Printing and newspaper publishing, including engraving, photoengraving. Products from finished materials: plastic, bone, cork, feathers, felt, fiber, copper, fur, glass, hair, horn, leather, precious and semiprecious stones, rubber, shell or yarn. Public utility electric substations and distribution centers, gas regulations centers and underground gasholder stations. Repair of household or office machinery or equipment. Rubber products, small, and synthetic treated fabrics (excluding all rubber and synthetic processing), such as washers, gloves, footwear, bathing caps and atomizers. Signs, as regulated by title 8, chapter 11 of this code. Silverware, plate and sterling. Soap and detergents, packaging only. Soldering and welding. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 10/11/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 4 of 8 Sporting and athletic equipment, such as balls, baskets, cues, gloves, bats, racquets and rods. Statuary, mannequins, figurines and religious and church art goods, excluding foundry operations. Storage and sale of trailers, farm implements and other similar equipment on an open lot. Storage of flammable liquids, fats or oil in tanks each of fifteen thousand (15,000) gallons or less capacity, but only after the locations and protective measures have been approved by local governing officials. Storage of household goods. Textiles - spinning, weaving, manufacturing, dyeing, printing, knit goods, yarn, thread and cordage, but not including textile bleaching. Tool and die shops. Tools and hardware, such as bolts, nuts and screws, doorknobs, drills, handtools and cutlery, hinges, house hardware, locks, nonferrous metal castings and plumbing appliances. Toys. Truck, truck tractor, truck trailer, car trailer or bus storage yard, when all equipment is in operable condition, but not including a truck or motor freight terminal, which are treated under section 10-8-1 of this chapter. Umbrellas. Upholstering (bulk), including mattress manufacturing, rebuilding and renovating. Vehicles, children's; such as bicycles, scooters, wagons and baby carriages. Watches. Wood products, such as furniture, boxes, crates, baskets and pencils and cooperage works. Any other manufacturing establishment that can be operated in compliance with the performance standards of section 10-8-1 of this chapter without creating objectionable noise, odor, dust, smoke, gas, fumes or vapor; and that is a use compatible with the use and occupancy of adjoining properties. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. Ord. 2003-10, 1 -14-2003; Ord. 2003-11, 1-14-2003; Ord. 2006-31, 4-11-2006; Ord. 2010-37, 7-13-2010) B. Wholesaling and warehousing: Local cartage express facilities (but not including motor freight terminals). http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 10/11/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 5 of 8 C. Public and community service uses as follows: Bus terminals, bus garages, bus lots, street railway terminals or streetcar houses. Electric substations. Fire stations. Municipal or privately owned recreation buildings or community centers. Parks and recreation areas. Police stations. Sewage treatment plants. Telephone exchanges. Water filtration plants. Water pumping stations. Water reservoirs. D. Residential uses as follows: Dwelling units for watchmen and their families when located on the premises where they are employed in such capacity. E. Miscellaneous uses as follows: Accessory uses. Radio and television towers. Temporary buildings for construction purposes for a period not to exceed the duration of such construction. F. Off street parking and loading as permitted or required in chapter 11 of this title. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 10/11/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 6 of 8 10-8A-2: CONDITIONS OF PERMITTED USES: All permitted uses are subject to the following conditions: A. Any production, processing, cleaning, servicing, testing, repair or storage of goods, materials or products shall conform with the performance standards set forth in section 10-8-1 of this chapter. B. All business, production, servicing and processing shall take place within completely enclosed buildings unless otherwise specified. Within one hundred fifty feet (150') of a residence district, all storage shall be in completely enclosed buildings or structures, and storage located elsewhere in this district may be open to the sky but shall be enclosed by solid walls or fences (including solid doors or gates thereto) at least eight feet (8') high, but in no case lower in height than the enclosed storage and suitably landscaped. However, open off street loading facilities and open off street parking of motor vehicles under one and one-half (11/2) tons' capacity may be unenclosed throughout the district, except for such screening of parking and loading facilities as may be required under the provisions of chapter 11 of this title. C. Uses established on the effective date hereof and by its provisions are rendered nonconforming, shall be permitted to continue subject to the regulations of chapter 10 of this title. D. Uses established after the effective date hereof shall conform fully to the performance standards set forth in section 10-8-1 of this chapter. (Ord. 1956-A, 3-28-1974) 10-8A-3: SPECIAL USES: The following uses may be allowed by special use permit in accordance with the provisions of section 10-14-6 of this title: Any use which may be allowed as a special use in the B-3 business district. Any use permitted in the M-2 general manufacturing district. Airport or aircraft landing fields. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 10/11/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 7 of 8 Building equipment, building materials, lumber, coal, sand and gravel yards, and yards for contracting equipment of public agencies, or public utilities, or materials or equipment of similar nature, ready mix batch plants, and asphalt manufacturing plants. Contractor facilities that include outdoor storage. Meat products. Miniwarehouse storage (see limitation under section 10-8A-7 of this article). Motor freight terminals. Planned developments, industrial. Sanitary landfill. Stadiums, auditoriums and arenas. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. 1994 Code; Ord. 2003 -10, 1-14-2003; Ord. 2005-58, 7-12-2005; Ord. 2006-31, 4-11-2006) 10-8A-4: YARD AREAS: No building or structure shall hereafter be erected or structurally altered unless the following yards are provided and maintained in connection with such building: A. Front Yard: On every zoning lot, a front yard of not less than twenty five feet (25') in depth shall be provided. However, where lots within the same block and comprising forty percent (40%) of the frontage on the same street are already developed on the effective date hereof with front yards with an average depth of less than twenty five feet (25), then such average depth shall be the required front yard depth for such frontage in said block. B. Side Yards: On every zoning lot, a side yard shall be provided along each side lot line. Each side yard shall be not less in width than ten percent (10%) of the lot width, but need not exceed twenty feet (20') in width. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) 10-8A-5: LOT COVERAGE: Not more than sixty percent (60%) of the area of a lot may be covered by buildings or structures, including accessory buildings. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 10/11/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 8 of 8 10-8A-6: FLOOR AREA RATIO: Not more than 0.8. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) 10-8A-7: MINIWAREHOUSE STORAGE: Whenever a special use is granted for miniwarehouse storage under this M-1 zoning district or any other permitted zoning district, the following restrictions shall apply: A. If the facility is within one hundred fifty feet (150') of a residential district, all storage shall be in completely enclosed buildings or structures, and storage located elsewhere in this district may be open to the sky, but shall be enclosed by solid walls or fences (including solid doors or gates thereto) at least eight feet (8') high, but in no case lower in height than the enclosed storage buildings and suitably landscaped consistent with the city's landscape ordinance. B. A minimum of three (3) parking spaces shall be provided. C. There shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') between buildings. (Ord. 2005-58, 7-12- 2005) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 10/11/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 2 ARTICLE B. M-2 GENERAL MANUFACTURING DISTRICT 10-813-1 : USES PERMITTED: The following uses are permitted: Any use permitted in the M-1 district. Any production, processing, cleaning, servicing, testing, repair or storage of materials, goods or products which conforms to the performance standards established for this district'. Cement block manufacture. Contractor or construction such as: building, cement, electrical, refrigeration, masonry building, plumbing, roofing, air conditioning, heating and ventilating, fuel oil, with a storage of fuel oils, gas and other flammable products limited to twelve thousand (12,000) gallons per tank, with a total storage on zoning lot not to exceed fifty thousand (50,000) gallons. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) 10-813-2: CONDITIONS OF PERMITTED USES: All permitted uses are subject to the following conditions: A. All production, processing, cleaning, servicing, testing, repair or storage of goods, materials or products shall conform with the performance standards set forth in section 10-8-1 of this chapter. B. Within one hundred fifty feet (150') of a residence district, all business, production, servicing, processing and storage shall take place or be within completely enclosed buildings; except, that storage of materials or products may be open to the sky provided the storage area is enclosed with a solid wall or fence, as required by the zoning administrator. However, within such one hundred fifty feet (150') of a residence district, off street loading facilities and off street parking of motor vehicles under one and one-half (02) tons' capacity may be unenclosed, except for such screening of parking and loading facilities as may be required under the provisions of chapter 11 of this title. (Ord. 1973- 56A, 3-28-1974) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 11/9/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 2 10-813-3: SPECIAL USES: The following uses may be allowed by special use permit in accordance with the provisions of section 10-14-6 of this title: Any use which may be allowed as a special use in the M-1 district. Aggregate materials extraction, processing and site reclamation in accordance with article C of this chapter. Railroad repair shops, maintenance buildings and switching yards. (Ord. 2009-24, 4-28- 2009) 10-813-4: YARD AREAS: All yard areas shall be the same as required in the M-1 limited manufacturing district. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) 10-813-5: LOT COVERAGE: Not more than sixty percent (60%) of the area of a lot may be covered by buildings or structures, including accessory buildings. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) 10-813-6: FLOOR AREA RATIO: Not more than 0.85. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) 10-813-7: SIGNS: The use of signs in this district shall be subject to the same regulations as set forth in title 8, chapter 11 of this code. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. 1994 Code) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 11/9/2011 I N Legend i WZ6 E Zoning i I Code Yo kville Business -------- S j F-1-Floodplain District S .J Center A-1-Agricultural District E-1-Estate Residence District `- R-1-One Familiy Residence District u R-2-One Family Residence District ' " ' . i•' R-2D-Duplex Two Family District I.._ -_--._, .I ,�.•�� R-3-General Residence District F R-4-General Residence District PUD-Planned Unit Development O-Office District B-1-Limited Business District 10 . B-2-General Business District i-' °—"--•1 \ 9MB-3-Service Business District -B-4-Business District L..N ®M-1-Limited Manufacturing District _M-2-General Manufacturing District L I � I � � i 34 47 I � I 0 ' • � / 11, .l 24 I 1 j Fox Industrial i � -~ Park 126 I 71 mac. i 1 �N f----------------------- 71 '\ i I I 47 i i•� M-1 & M-2 The Data is provided without warranty or any representation of 0 1,250 2,500 5,000 accuracy,timeliness,or completeness.It is the responsibility of the Limited/General Manufacturing Districts "appropiatenesofit use.curacy,tdCiness,cokville makes no appropriateness of its use.The United City of Yorkville makes no Feet warranties,expressed or implied,to the use of the Data. May 201 0 -Map produced by United City of Yorkville GIS U.S.Department of Justice Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco, AT F Federal Firearms Licensee Quick Reference and Best Practices Guide \ a d � \ w X ` The Importance of Compliance with Federal Firearms Laws • Regulations Every day,ATF's Industry Operations Investigators Ten Violations Having an Impact on (IOls) assist FFLs and help them understand and Public Safety follow the rules for conducting a firearms business. 1. Failure to Obtain a Form 4473—Firearms Whether it is with the proper procedures for Transaction Record When Required. recordkeeping or the laws for transferring a firearm, 2. Failure to Obtain a Complete and Correct IOIs ensure that FFLs comply with the laws and Form 4473. regulations. 3. Failure to Conduct a Background Check IOIs inspect your business to ensure compliance When Required. with the Federal law and regulations. It is vital 4. Sale or Transfer of a Firearm to Prohibited that you comply with all laws and regulations, Person. both to maintain your license and protect your community from violent crime. We encourage you 5. Improper Sale to allon-Resident. to contact ATF if you have any questions about your 6. Failure to Obtain Appropriate Identification responsibilities as an FFL. Documents. To learn more about the laws and regulations, 7. Failure to Record Complete and Accurate safety and security recommendations, and training Acquisition and Disposition Information. opportunities, we encourage you to read the 8. Failure to Report the Sale of Multiple following publications found at www.atf.gov: Handguns. 9 Federal Firearms Regulations Reference Guide, . Failure to Report Lost or Stolen Firearms. ATF Publication 5300.4 10. Providing False Information. Safety and Security Information for Federal Firearms Licensees,ATF Publication 3317.2 Don't Lie for the Other Guy Publications Having conducted thousands of inspections over the years,ATF has compiled a list of the more common issues encountered by licensees. 1 Your License If your mailing address changes: Because all ATF For the purposes of this publication, a Federal firearms correspondence is mailed to the mailing address on your licensee is referred to as `you,' `a licensee,' and an license, any changes require you to notify the Chief, `FFL.' You should examine your license carefully to FFLC, as soon as possible by sending a letter advising of make sure all of the information is correct. If you find an the new mailing address to: error,return the license to the Chief, Federal Firearms 244 Needy Road Licensing Center(FFLC), for correction. Martinsburg,WV 25405. You must keep your license posted and readily available If You Intend to Change Your Business for inspection by any ATF officer. Use a certified copy Structure of your license (make a copy of the unsigned original and Because a license is not transferable, a successor buying, sign it)to make firearms purchases. Mailed, faxed, or leasing, or otherwise acquiring the firearms operations of scanned copies of certified copies are acceptable. an FFL must obtain a new license. For example, if a sole proprietor forms a Limited Liability Corporation(LLC), Expiration and Renewal of Your License the LLC must obtain a new license. The LLC cannot Your Federal firearms license is in effect until the operate using the sole proprietor's license. expiration date on the license,unless terminated sooner. It covers business operations only at the location on the If there is a change of control of a FFL by stock purchase license or at a qualifying n show or event in the State or otherwise,the licensee must notify ATF in writing q g within 30 days of the change.Upon renewal,the where you are licensed. corporation must file a new Application for Firearms ATF will send a renewal application to you about License (ATF F 5310.12,ATF Form 7)and provide 60 days before the expiration date on your license. If information on all new responsible persons. you have not received your renewal application 30 days before the license expiration date,please contact the FFLs may report new responsible persons by filing a FFLC toll-free at 1-866-662-2750. You should also call letter with the Chief,FFLC. The letter must provide all if you no longer wish to be licensed. of the identifying information for the new responsible person(s)as required on ATF Form 7. The letter must To renew,you must complete and send the application, be accompanied by a current picture of the responsible with the required fee attached,to the address specified person and fingerprints submitted on an FBI Fingerprint on the form before the license expiration date. If you file Card(FD-258). your renewal before the license expiration date,you may continue to operate until you receive your new license. ATF Forms 4473 If the new license does not arrive by your expiration You must obtain a completed Firearms Transaction date,ATF will issue a Letter of Continuing Authority to Record(Form 4473)for each and every sale or Operate (LOA)to establish proof of your licensed status other transfer of a firearm to a non-licensee. It is to other FFLs. your responsibility to ensure that each Form 4473 is Changing Your Mailing Address or the completed correctly in accordance with the instructions on the form. The correct completion of these forms Address of Your Premises enhances traceability of firearms. If you intend to change the location of your business premises:Notify the Chief,FFLC, at least 30 days Correctly completing ATF Forms 4473 is one of the most before moving your business to a new address by important things you can do to ensure that ATF can trace filing ATF Form 5300.38-Application for an Amended crime guns. Federal Firearms License. Your original license must be This form must be completed when you: submitted for changes to reflect the new address. 1. sell or trade a firearm; You may not operate as an FFL at a new address until 2. return a consignment firearm; you have received the amended license from ATF. 3. return a pawned firearm; 4. loan or rent a firearm for use off of your licensed premises; or 2 5. otherwise transfer a firearm to a non-licensed person. representative must make any changes or corrections to Note: You must transfer the firearm to the person who Sections B and D of the photocopy. Do NOT make the completed the Form 4473 and NOT to a spouse,relative, changes on the original Form 4473.Attach the corrected or other representative of that person. photocopy to the original Form 4473 and retain as part of your records. Exceptions to the ATF Form 4473 Requirement: You are not required to obtain a Form 4473 for the ATF suggests that you consider implementing a following sales and other transfers: secondary review procedure in which another employee reviews Forms 4473 for errors and omissions prior to 1. Transfer of a firearm to another FFL(including transferring a firearm. collectors when transferring a Curio &Relic firearm); Background Checks 2. The return of a repaired firearm to the person from You must conduct a National Instant Criminal whom it was received; Background Check System(NICS)check or appropriate 3. The sale of a firearm to a law enforcement agency State background check for each and every sale or other or to a law enforcement officer for official duties transfer of a firearm to a non-licensee. The NICS or State if the transaction meets the requirements of 27 CFR background check ensures that any person who purchases §478.134,discussed on pages 7 and 8; or a firearm from you may lawfully possess firearms.A 4. Transfer of a replacement firearm of the same NICS or State background check MUST be conducted kind and type to the person from whom a firearm was before: received. 1. The sale or trade of a firearm; Transferee's Sections of Form 4473: 2. The return of a consigned firearm; It is YOUR responsibility to make sure that the buyer 3. The redemption of a pawned firearm; or other transferee provides ALL information required in Section A(Items 1 to 17), and Section C (Items 24 4. The loan or rental of a firearm for use off of your and 25),if applicable, of the Form 4473 BEFORE you licensed premises; or transfer the firearm. The buyer must personally complete 5. Any other non-exempt transfer of a firearm. Sections A and C. Failure to conduct a background check has a significant Licensee's Sections of Form 4473: impact on public safety.You could be fined,have your You must fully and correctly provide ALL information license suspended or revoked, or be prosecuted. required in Section B (Items 18 to 23) and Section D Note: You may only deliver the firearm to the person (Items 26 to 36)of the Form 4473. This information on whom the NICS or State background check was must be recorded on the Form 4473 and not merely be conducted and NOT a spouse,relative, or other contained in attached or other available documents. representative of that person. If information required on the Form 4473 is also Exceptions to the Background Check contained on a State firearms transfer document or other Requirement: record,you must still enter the information on the Form You are NOT required to conduct a NICS or State 4473, even if that means entering the same information background check with respect to the following: on two or more forms. However,you may attach photocopies of additional documentation provided by 1. The sale or transfer of a firearm where the transferee legal aliens rather than record the type of documentation presents a valid State permit/license from the State in response to Items 20b and 20c. in which your licensed premises is located AND the State permit or license is recognized by ATF as a Errors and Omissions on the Form 4473: qualifying alternative to the background check If, after the firearm has been transferred,you discover requirement; that the Form 4473 is incomplete or was improperly 2. The transfer of a firearm to another FFL(including completed, do not alter the original. Instead,you should collectors when transferring a Curio&Relic firearm); make a photocopy of the inaccurate Form 4473. Only the buyer or transferee may make changes or corrections to 3. The return of a repaired firearm to the person from Sections A and C of the photocopy.You or an authorized whom it was received; 3 4. The sale of a firearm to a law enforcement agency 3. Person Convicted of a Crime Punishable by or a law enforcement officer for official duties if the Imprisonment for a Term Exceeding 1 Year: transaction meets the specific requirements of This prohibited person category includes any 27 CFR§478.134(discussed on page 13); person who has been convicted of a felony or other 5. The transfer of a replacement firearm of the same crime for which the person could have been sen- kind and type to the person from whom a firearm was tenced to imprisonment for a term exceeding received; 1 year—EVEN if the court actually placed the person on probation or sentenced the person to a 6. The transfer of a firearm that is subject to the term of imprisonment for 1 year or less. National Firearms Act if the transfer was pre-approved in writing by ATE 4. Fugitive from Justice: A fugitive from justice is a person who has fled from any State to avoid prose- Prohibited Transfers cution for a crime (felony or misdemeanor) or to You MAY NOT sell or transfer a firearm or ammunition avoid giving testimony in any criminal proceeding. to any person you know or have reasonable cause to 5. Unlawful Drug User or Drug Addict: This believe is prohibited from possessing or receiving a prohibited person category includes any person firearm. Do not sell or otherwise transfer a firearm and who unlawfully uses—or is addicted to—marijuana, do not contact NICS if you have reason to believe that depressants, stimulants,narcotic drugs, or other a person seeking to obtain a firearm is prohibited from controlled substances.Alcohol is NOT considered a receiving or possessing a firearm. controlled substance. Note: If a person answers"No"to Item l La or 12 of 6. Adjudicated Mental Defective or Person Form 4473, or answers"Yes"to one or more questions Involuntarily Committed to a Mental Institution: in Items l Lb through 11.1 of Form 4473,that person has This prohibited person category includes any person given you reason to believe he or she is prohibited and who has EVER been adjudicated by a court,board, the transaction must be stopped. commission, or other lawful authority to be, as a You MAY NOT sell or transfer a firearm or ammunition result of marked subnormal intelligence or mental to any of the following prohibited persons or in the illness, incompetency, condition, or disease, a dan- following circumstances: ger to himself or herself or to others or to lack the mental capacity to contract or to manage his/or 1. Straw Purchaser: A"straw purchaser"is a person her own affairs. This category also includes any who is not the"actual buyer"of the firearm; that is, person who has been subject to a finding of insanity a person who obtains a firearm for another person. in a criminal case, including a finding that he or she Straw purchases are a primary source of firearms is incompetent to stand trial. Also included is any used in crime. If you suspect that a transaction is person who has EVER been formally committed to a straw purchase or there are suspicious circum- a mental institution by a court or other lawful autho- stances surrounding the potential sale—such as one rity. This category does NOT include a person com- person picking out the firearm,handling the firearm, miffed to a mental institution solely for observation and providing the payment for the firearm while or a person who was voluntarily admitted to a another person completes the Form 4473—you mental institution. should not sell the firearm. Similarly, if one person attempts to purchase a firearm,NICS denies or 7. Person Dishonorably Discharged from the delays the attempted purchase, and another person Military: A person is considered dishonorably with him or her attempts to buy the same firearm, discharged only if he or she was separated from the you must not complete this sale. Armed Forces of the United States as a result of a dishonorable discharge or a dismissal adjudged by 2. Person Under Indictment: A person"under indict- a general court-martial. This prohibition does NOT ment"includes any person who has been charged include persons with a bad conduct discharge or any by indictment or information in any court with a other less than honorable discharge. crime for which he or she may be sentenced to a term of imprisonment exceeding 1 year. 8. Person Subject to a Restraining Order: This prohibited person category includes any person who is currently subject to a court order that 4 restrains the person from harassing, stalking, or 13. Sale of a Handgun or Handgun Ammunition to threatening an intimate partner, child of the per- a Person Under Age 21: You may not sell or de- son, or child of the intimate partner OR engaging in liver a firearm other than a rifle or a shotgun—or other conduct that would place the intimate partner ammunition other than rifle or shotgun ammuni- in reasonable fear of bodily injury to the intimate tion—to a person who you know or have reasonable partner or child. The court order must meet the cause to believe is less than 21 years old. A firearm specific requirements of 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(8)to frame or receiver is not a rifle or shotgun and may be prohibiting. not be sold to a person under 21 years old. 9. Person Convicted of a Misdemeanor Crime of 14. Sale in Violation of State Law or Published Domestic Violence: This prohibited person cate- Ordinance: You may not sell or deliver a firearm to gory includes any person who has EVER been any person in any State where the purchase or pos- convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime session would be in violation of a State law or of domestic violence regardless of the title of the published ordinance. offense. The offense must meet the definition of "misdemeanor crime of domestic violence"in We recommend that you refer to the most recent 18 U.S.C. §921(a)(33). Note:Unlike other prohi- edition ofATF's State Laws and Published bited person categories, law enforcement officers Ordinances–Firearms. purchasing firearms for official use are NOT exempt from this prohibited person category. Age Restrictions 10. Person who has Renounced U.S. Citizenship: As noted above,under Federal law,the minimum age A person has renounced his or her United States to purchase firearms and ammunition from an FFL is citizenship if he or she takes formal steps to re- 18. If the firearm is other than a rifle or a shotgun—or nounce her/his citizenship before a diplomatic or ammunition for other than a rifle or a shotgun—the consular officer or before an officer designated by minimum age is 21 [18 U.S.C. 922(b)(1)]. However: the Attorney General during a time of war. 1. You may sell ammunition that is interchangeable 11. Aliens Illegally or Unlawfully in the United between rifles and handguns to a buyer who is at least States: This prohibited person category includes 18 years of age if you are satisfied that he or she any person who unlawfully entered the United will use the ammunition in a rifle. States or who illegally remains in the United States 2. Regardless of less restrictive State and local age after his or her authorized period of stay has expired. requirements for firearms and ammunition purchases, you must adhere to the above Federal mininum age 11 a.Nonimmigrant Aliens: A nonimmigrant alien is an provisions. alien who is lawfully in the United States on a tem- porary basis for purposes of travel,business, study, Transfers Between Licensees etc. The term does NOT include a permanent resi- Generally,FFLs may transfer firearms to other FFLs dent alien(someone who possesses a"green card.") including interstate transfers,without completing A nonimmigrant alien may only purchase or receive Form 4473 for these transactions. In these instances,the a firearm if he or she: (a)was admitted to the United following procedures must be followed: States for lawful hunting or sporting purposes or presents a valid hunting license or permit issued 1. Transactions between licensees must be recorded in by a State; (b) qualifies as a foreign diplomat, offi- the bound book(Acquisition and Disposition or cial, or law enforcement officer as defined at A&D)records of both licensees. 18 U.S.C. §922(y)(2); or(c)has received a waiver 2. The FFL who is buying the firearm must furnish a of the prohibition from the Attorney General. certified copy of their license to the selling FFL prior 12. Sale of a Firearm or Ammunition to a Person to the transfer of any firearm.This certified copy Under Age 18: You may not sell or deliver a fire- may be emailed or faxed. arm or ammunition to a person you know or have reasonable cause to believe is less than 18 years old. 5 State Residency Requirements General Identification Requirements Generally,you MAY NOT sell or transfer a firearm to You MUST verify the identity of each non-licensee a non-licensee who resides outside the State in which buyer by examining the person's identification your licensed premises is located. A person's State of document(s)prior to transferring a firearm. A proper residence is the State in which the person resides and the "identification document"is: person is present with the intent of making a home in that 1. A document containing the name,residence address, State. date of birth, and photograph of the person; Military members on active duty and legal aliens 2. A document that was made or issued by or under have special residency considerations. the authority of the U.S. Government, a State or local A member of the Armed Forces on active duty is a government, or a foreign government; resident of the State in which his or her permanent duty 3. A document that is of a type commonly accepted for station is located. FFLs may accept electronic permanent the purpose of identification of individuals. change of station(PCS)orders, accompanied by a valid military identification card,to establish residency for an Common examples of acceptable identification active duty military member of the Armed Forces. documents are a valid driver's license or a valid State identification card issued in lieu of a driver's license. A buyer who is not a citizen of the United States must Social security cards are not acceptable because they provide additional documentation(beyond a valid do not contain a residence address, date of birth, or Government-issued photo identification that contains photograph. However, a firearms buyer may be identified the buyer's name,residence address,and date of by any combination of documents which together birth)to establish that he or she has resided in a State contain all of the required information(as long as all the continuously for at least 90 days immediately prior to the documents are Government issued): name,residence date of the sale or delivery of the firearm. Examples of address,photograph, and date of birth. acceptable documentation include,but are not limited to, utility bills,bank statements,rent receipts, and mortgage Military members and legal aliens may have payments. This original documentation must contain the special identification document considerations. buyer's name(not the name of someone they are living No additional valid identification documentation with)and home address. is required of an active-duty member of the Armed Forces or a legal alien if he or she possesses a valid Permitted Sales to Non-Residents of Your State identification document(e.g., driver's license)that You may sell a firearm to a person who does not reside contains his or her name,residence address, date of in your State by shipping the firearm to a licensed birth, and photograph and is issued by the State in dealer in the buyer's State of residence and having the which your business premises is located. If a member buyer take possession of the firearm from that licensee. of the Armed Forces or a legal alien does not possess The licensed dealer in the buyer's State of residence is a valid, State-issued identification document with the responsible for the Form 4473 and NICS background necessary information,you may accept a combination check. Your A&D records should reflect the transfer to of valid Government-issued documents to satisfy the out-of-State FFL and not to the end purchaser. the identification document requirement.A member You may make an over-the-counter sale of a rifle or of the Armed Forces on active duty may satisfy the shotgun to a non-resident if the transaction complies with identification document requirement by presenting his or all the laws of your State and the laws of the buyer's her military identification card along with official orders State. showing his or her permanent duty station. We recommend that you refer to the most recent edition of ATF's State Laws and Published Ordinances— Firearms,prior to consummating an over-the-counter sale of a rifle or shotgun to an out-of-State resident. 6 Nonimmigrant Aliens Purchasing and If a nonimmigrant alien meets these criteria and Renting Firearms from an FFL for residency requirements and a properly completed NICS Possession in the United States check is conducted by the FFL,then the alien is eligible Nonimmigrant aliens generally MAY NOT receive or to purchase a firearm from an FFL. possess firearms or ammunition in the United States. Sales of Firearms to Law Enforcement However, a nonimmigrant alien lawfully admitted to Officers the United States may receive or possess firearms or ammunition if he or she fits within one of the exceptions Section 925(a)(1)of the GCA generally exempts law to the nonimmigrant alien prohibitions. These exceptions enforcement agencies from the transportation, shipment, apply to an alien who has been lawfully admitted into the receipt,possession, or importation controls of the GCA United States under a nonimmigrant visa,if that alien is: When firearms or ammunition are to be used for official agency business. 1. Admitted to the United States for lawful hunting or sporting purposes or is in possession of a hunting In this regard,law enforcement officers purchasing license or permit lawfully issued in the United States; firearms for official duty need to provide certain documentation. If a law enforcement officer is issued a 2. An official representative of a foreign government certification letter on official agency letterhead signed who is(a) accredited to the U.S. Government or the by a person in authority within the agency(other than Government's mission to an international organiza- the person purchasing the firearm) stating that the tion having its headquarters in the United States; or officer will use the firearm in official duties and that (b) en route to or from another country to which that a records check reveals that the purchasing officer has alien is accredited if the firearm is being possessed not been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic or received in the representative's official capacity; violence,then the officer may purchase the firearm for 3. An official of a foreign government or a distin- official use. There are no restrictions as to the purchasing guished foreign visitor who has been so designated officer's State of residence or agency location. You are by the Department of State; or not required to prepare a Form 4473 for the transaction 4. A foreign law enforcement officer of a friendly or to conduct a NICS Check; however,the disposition to foreign government entering the United States on the officer must be entered into your A&D records, and official law enforcement business. the certification letter from the officer must be retained Any individual who has been admitted to the as part of your required records. United States under a nonimmigrant visa may receive ATF considers the following as persons having authority a waiver after submitting a petition to and obtaining to certify the eligibility of law enforcement officers: approval from ATF. 1. In a city or county police department,the director of In addition to meeting at least one of the exceptions for public safety or the chief or commissioner of police. nonimmigrant aliens,buyers must also satisfy the legal 2. In a sheriff's office,the sheriff. residency requirements, as discussed below. 3. In a State police or highway patrol department,the A nonimmigrant alien must provide the required superintendent or the supervisor in charge of the Government-issued photo identification document(s) and office to which the State officer or employee is documentation establishing residency in your State for assigned. 90 days immediately before the sale or transfer of the 4. In Federal law enforcement offices,the supervisor firearm. He or she must also provide documentation of in charge of the office to which the Federal officer or his or her hunting license or permit, Attorney General waiver, or documentation for any other exception. employee is assigned. Certification letters may be signed by persons other than Note: You may attach a photocopy of the additional those listed above,provided there is a proper delegation documents provided rather than record the type of of authority. Because individual circumstances vary, documentation in Items 20c and 20d of the ATF Form FFLs with any questions are encouraged to check 4473. with their local ATF field office before accepting certifications letters from other officials. Sales to Members of the Armed Forces 2. The name and address of the non-licensee or the A member of the Armed Forces on active duty is a name and FFL license number of the licensee from resident of the State in which his or her permanent whom you received the firearm; duty station is located. However, if a military member 3. The name of the manufacturer and importer(if any) maintains a home in one State and has a permanent duty of the firearm; station in a another State to which he or she commutes 4. The model of the firearm; each day,the military member has two States of 5. The serial number of the firearm; residence and may purchase a firearm in either State— and must list both the residence address and permanent 6. The type of firearm(pistol,revolver,rifle, shotgun, duty station in Item 2 on the Form 4473. receiver, frame, etc); and A military member on active duty must present either a 7. The caliber or gauge of the firearm. current driver's license or State identification card from Required Disposition Information your State, or a copy of the official orders showing the For each firearm you sell or otherwise dispose of,you military member's permanent duty station in your State must completely and accurately record the following along with a military photo identification card, an out-of- information in your bound book: State driver's license, or an out-of-State identification 1. The date of sale or other disposition of the firearm; card. 2. The name and address of the non-licensee or the ATF has determined that you may accept electronic name and FFL license number of the licensee to Permanent Change of Station(PCS)orders. You are whom the firearm was transferred. reminded to exercise due diligence to ensure that these Alternatively, if you file your Forms 4473 in numerical electronic orders reflect a PCS,not a temporary move or order,you may record your internal Form 4473 number deployment(TDY)and that the dates of the transfer are in the A&D record in lieu of recording the name and identified on the document and are inclusive of the date address of the non-licensee to whom you sold or of the attempted firearm acquisition. You are required to transferred the firearm. verify the identity of the transferee by examining a valid identification document. Time Requirements for Recording Acquisition Information Acquisition and Disposition (A&D) Record The required acquisition information must be recorded You MUST at all times maintain on your licensed in your A&D record no later than the close of the next premises A&D records that document the acquisition and business day following the date of acquisition. However, disposition of firearms. The A&D record must include if you maintain a commercial record of the acquisition, information about the acquisition and disposition of and the commercial record meets the requirements of ALL firearms for sale or trade,consignment firearms, 27 CFR §478.125(g),you may delay the recording of the pawned firearms,repair firearms(if sent for repairs or acquisition information in your bound book for 7 days kept overnight),replacement firearms, firearms loaned following the date of acquisition.Note: If the acquisition or rented for use off your licensed premises, and all other information is not entered in the A&D record prior to the acquisitions and dispositions of firearms. All firearms sale or other disposition of the firearm,you must enter that you acquire must be documented in your A&D the acquisition information at the time of the sale or record. disposition. Note: You may maintain a computerized A&D record Time Requirements for Recording if the record meets the criteria outlined in ATF Ruling Disposition Information 2008-2. The required disposition information must be recorded in your A&D record no later than 7 days following the Required Acquisition Information date of the sale or other disposition.When the disposition For each firearm you acquire,you must completely and is made to a non-licensee,you must retain the Form accurately record all of the following information in your 4473 separate from your other Forms 4473—and keep A&D record: it readily available for inspection—until the disposition 1. The date of receipt of the firearm; information is entered in the A&D record. 8 Licensed Firearms Manufacturers ATF may only authorize an alternate method or If you hold a Type 07 FFL,you are required to keep your procedure when it is substantially equivalent to the acquisition and disposition records in accordance with procedure specified in the law and the alternate method the regulatory requirements of 27 CFR 478.123(a), (b) does not hinder the effective administration and and(d). enforcement of the law and regulations or increase costs to the Government. Your request should be sent to: Time Requirements for Recording Acquisition Chief,Firearms Industry Programs Branch and Disposition Information in Manufacturer Bureau of Alcohol,Tobacco,Firearms and Explosives Records 99 New York Avenue,NE. Room 6N/672 The required acquisition information for each firearm Washington,DC 20226 manufactured or otherwise acquired and the date of such manufacture or acquisition shall be recorded not later Reporting Multiple Sales than the seventh day following such manufacture or other You MUST report to ATF on Form 3310.4 (Report acquisition. Firearms for which acquisition information must be recorded include both completed weapons that of Multiple Sale or Other Disposition of Pistols and Revolvers) any sale or transfer of two or more pistols, will or may readily be converted to expel a projectile revolvers, or any combination of pistols and revolvers by the action of an explosive and frames or receivers totaling two or more to an unlicensed individual that that may be sold, shipped, or otherwise disposed of takes place at one time or during any 5 consecutive separately. The sale or other disposition shall be recorded business days. The report must be made no later than not later than the seventh day following the transaction. the close of business on the day that the multiple sale or Note: Acquisition records of manufacturers and other disposition occurs. importers must be retained as a permanent record. Mail the original or fax a copy of the completed Form Licensed Firearms Importers 3310.4 to ATF as directed on the Form 3310.4. You must also forward a completed copy of the Form 3310.4 If you hold a Type 08 FFL,you are required to keep your to the official designated by the State or local authorities acquisition and disposition records in accordance with to receive the form. In the absence of such a designation, the regulatory requirements of 27 CFR 478.122(a), (b) forward a completed copy of the Form 3310.4 to the and(d). department of State police or State law enforcement Time Requirements for Recording Acquisition agency that has jurisdiction over the place where the and Disposition Information in Importer Records transaction(s)occurred. The required acquisition information for each firearm The ATF mailing address and fax number are: imported or otherwise acquired and the date of such ATF,National Tracing Center importation or acquisition shall be recorded within P.O.Box 0279 15 days of the date of importation or other acquisition. Kearneysville,West Virginia 25430-0279 The date of importation is the date the firearm was 1-877-283-0288(fax) brought into the United States. The sale or other disposition shall be recorded not later than the seventh Retain a copy of the completed Form 3310.4, attached to day following the transaction. the back of the ATF Form 4473 for the transfer, as part of your records. Note: Acquisition records of manufacturers and importers must be retained as permanent records. No Form 3310.4 is necessary for the return of multiple handguns to the same person from whom they were Alternate Methods or Procedures received—such as the return of multiple consignment, (Variances) pawned, or repaired handguns. In certain circumstances,you may apply to ATF for Accountability for Firearms a variance in the event that you wish to operate your Violations related to firearms missing from inventory are firearms business in a manner that differs from the among the most commonly cited GCA violations, and requirements of the regulations. The regulations that have a direct impact on public safety. These violations allow ATF to grant a variance can be found in 27 CFR 478.22 and 27 CFR 478.125(h). 9 occur when FFLs have"open entries"in their A&D Implementing these best practices in your daily business records but are unable to physically locate the firearms in operations will better enable you to account for your inventory. business assets,identify security issues, and provide To reduce or eliminate violations resultant from quick reporting of firearms that have been lost or stolen unaccounted for firearms,please consider the following from your business. best practices to ensure accountability of your firearms Lost or Stolen Firearms inventory: You MUST report to ATF each missing,lost, or stolen 1. Consider setting aside in a centralized location all firearm within 48 hours of discovery of the loss or completed Forms 4473 in a centralized location for the by calling 1-800-930-9275 and by completing and each day's sales.At the close of the business day, forwarding an original Form 3310.11 (Federal Firearms document in the disposition record the disposition of Licensee Theft/Loss Report) to ATF as directed on the each firearm recorded on the Forms 4473. Form 3310.11. 2. Consider setting aside in a centralized location each day's firearms taken into your business.We suggest A loss of a firearm occurs when you cannot determine that you document in the acquisition record the the disposition of a firearm and cannot locate it. These acquisition of each firearm at the end of each lost firearms are different from stolen firearms because business day. there is no indication that they were stolen. You must also report the theft or loss to the appropriate local 3. Some FFLs periodically conduct full inventory law enforcement agency. The"open entries"in your reconciliations.A full inventory reconciliation will A&D record of lost or stolen firearms must be closed enable you to balance each firearm in physical out by documenting in the disposition section that the inventory with an open entry in your A&D record firearm was lost or stolen and the ATF issued incident and identify any discrepancies between your records number.Retain a copy of the Form 3310.11 as part of and physical inventory: your records. See ATF Publication 3317.2,Safety and a. Consider taking a full count of all firearms in the Security Information for Federal Firearms Licensees, for business inventory and taking a count of all open additional information. entries in your A&D record; b. Ensure that all sales receipts (FFL transactions, Providing False Information repairs)and Forms 4473 have been entered as You must not provide information on required records dispositions in the A&D record; (including Forms 4473,bound books, Forms 3310.4, c. Be alert for discrepancies—if there are more Forms 3310.11, license renewal applications)that you "open entries"than firearms in inventory,then know is false or that you have reason to believe is false. there are firearms missing from inventory. If there You must not transfer a firearm to a buyer or are more firearms in inventory than there are transferee—or any other person—who provides "open entries,"then there are likely firearms that information on a Form 4473 or other required record that have not been recorded as acquisitions; you know is false or have reason to believe is false. You d. You can ensure the accuracy of your documenta- must terminate the transaction. tion by using the A&D record information(in particular,the make,model, caliber, serial number) Licensed Collectors to compare each"open entry"to the appropriate Licensed collectors may buy curio or relic firearms firearm in the business inventory; from any source and dispose of curio or relic firearms e. You can also ensure that all firearms are recorded to another licensee anywhere.As a licensed collector, in the A&D record by verifying each firearm to an you may dispose of and receive curio or relic firearms to entry in the acquisition record where an open entry non-licensed residents of your State. (disposition)exists. 10 You must maintain A&D records. Your collector's or any ATF office that serves the area where the business license entitles you to conduct transactions in curios and was located. These records provide vital assistance to relics only. A licensed collector has the same status as a law enforcement in tracing firearms used in crimes. non-licensee in any transaction involving firearms other than curios and relics. ATF Form 4473 is not required for ConCIUSIOn curio and relic transactions. As a Federal firearms dealer,it is your responsibility to A curio or relic license does not entitle the holder to make sure that you comply with all applicable firearms engage in the business of dealing in firearms, including laws and regulations. The following resources may assist dealing in curio or relic firearms. you: • Federal Firearms Regulations Reference Guide; Sale of Business or Going Out of Business • ATF Website at wwwatf.gov; You must give written notice to the Chief,FFLC,within . FFL Newsletters; 30 days after you sell or discontinue your firearms or ammunition business. If you sell or discontinue your • Instructions on ATF Forms 4473,3310.4,and 3310.11; firearms or ammunition business and are succeeded by • State Attorney General for questions concerning State a new licensee,your firearms dealer records should be firearms laws and regulations. marked to show this fact and must be delivered to the If you are unable to determine the appropriate course of successor. If you do not have a successor,you must conduct,call your local ATF office for guidance. deliver all of your firearms records within 30 days of going completely out of the firearms business to: ATF National Tracing Center Out-of-Business Records Center 244 Needy Road Martinsburg,WV 25405 11 For questions concerning unlawful activities,contact the ATF Criminal Enforcement Field Divisions below: Atlanta Field Division Houston Field Division Philadelphia Field Division 2600 Century Parkway, Suite 300 15355 Vantage Pkwy West, Suite 200 601 Walnut Street, Suite 100E Atlanta,GA 30345-3104 Houston,TX 77032-1965 Philadelphia,PA 19106 (404)417-2600 (281)372-2900 (215)446-7800 Baltimore Field Division Kansas City Field Division Phoenix Field Division G.H.Fallon Building 2600 Grand Avenue, Suite 200 201 East Washington Street, Suite 940 31 Hopkins Plaza, 5"'Floor Kansas City,MO 64108 Phoenix,AZ 85004 Baltimore,MD 21201-2825 (816)559-0700 (602)776-5400 (443)965-2000 Los Angeles Field Division San Francisco Field Division Boston Field Division 550 North Brand Avenue, 8"Floor 5601 Arnold Road, Suite 400 Federal Building Glendale,CA 921203 Dublin,CA 94568-7724 10 Causeway Street,Room 791 (818)265-2500 (925)479-7500 Boston,MA 02222-01047 (617)557-1200 Louisville Field Division Seattle Field Division 600 Dr.Martin Luther King,Jr.Place 915 2nd Avenue,Room 790 Charlotte Field Division Suite 322 Seattle,WA 98174 6701 Carmel Road, Suite 200 Louisville,KY 40202 (206)389-5800 Charlotte,NC 28226 (502)753-3400 (704)716-1800 St.Paul Field Division Miami Field Division 30 East Seventh Street,Room 1900 Chicago Field Division 11410 N.W.20'Street, Suite 201 St.Paul,MN 55101 525 West Van Buren Street, Suite 600 Miami,FL 33172 (651)726-0200 Chicago,IL 60607 (305)597-4800 (312) 846-7200 Tampa Field Division Nashville Field Division 400 North Tampa Street,Room 2100 Columbus Field Division 5300 Maryland Way, Suite 200 Tampa,FL 33602 230 West Street, Suite 400 Brentwood,TN 37027 (813)202-7300 Columbus,OH 43215 (615)565-1400 (614) 827-8400 Washington Field Division New Orleans Field Division 1401 H Street,NW, Suite 900 Dallas Field Division One Galleria Boulevard, Suite 1700 Washington,DC 20226 1114 Commerce Street, Suite 303 Metairie,LA 70001 (202)648-8010 Dallas,TX 75242 (504)841-7000 (469)227-4300 New York Field Division Denver Field Division 24137-Street, 31d Floor 1961 Stout Street,Room 674 Brooklyn,NY 11232 Denver, CO 80294 (718)650-4000 (303) 844-7450 Newark Field Division Detroit Field Division 1 Garret Mountain Plaza, Suite 500 1155 Brewery Park Blvd, Suite 300 Woodland Park,NJ 07424 Detroit,MI 48207-2602 (973)413-1179 (313)202-3400 To Obtain Assistance Regarding To Receive ATF Forms and To Ship Out-of-Business Records Your License Publications ATF National Tracing Center ATF Firearms Licensing Center ATF Distribution Center 244 Needy Road 244 Needy Road 1519 Cabin Branch Drive Martinsburg,WV 25405 Martinsburg,WV 25405 Landover,MD 20785-3816 (304)260-1500 or 1-800-788-7133 1-866-662-2750 (301)583-4696 12 Sample Entries for Acquisition and Disposition Book for Federal Firearms licensee Brian Smith for Brian's Sport Shop Description of Firearm Receipt Dispostion Manufacturer and Serial Caliber or Name and Address or Address or Licensee No. if licensee, Importer(if any) Model Number Type Gauge Date Name and Licensee No. Date Name or Form 4473 Serial Number if Forms 4473 filed numerically 1. Ithaca 1021004 660138 Shotgun 20 8/2/01 John's Fine Guns 1/29/02 James House Form 4473#2 FFL 4-42-98777 2. Smith &Wesson 10 M60512 Revolver .38 8/4/01 Sinap Shop FFL 7-86-34989 3. Western Field 10504 G91467 Shotgun 20 8/4/01 FFL 4-42-98777 John's Fine Guns 11/2/02 Jim Michaels Form 4473#68 Rod& Gun Show Springfield, IL. Al Green 4. Winchester 94 382906 Rifle 30-30 11/4/01 928 Bob Hill 9/1/02 William Bounce Form 4473#50 Oak Hill, IL 60651 Thomas Problem 5. Remington 870 4932 Shotgun 16 6/9/02 605 E. Colonial 6/20/02 Fit It or Melt It, Inc. FFL 5-46-39988 Bluff, IL 60651 6. Remington 540X 312698V Revolver 22 7/2/02 Joan Realtor FFL 2-91-34487 7/14/02 Brian Smith 605 E. Colonial Blues, IL 60651 (Personal Collection) Jon Doe 7. Browning 1200 38679 Pistol .45 8/24/02 631 Pine Street 7/1/03 Jon Doe Form 4473#56 Elkton, IL 60605 Jim Michaels ATF Issued Incident Number 8. Western Field 10504 G91467 Shotgun 20 11/24/02 829 Columbia 12/2/02 Stolen Reported Springfield, IL 60685 F2010-001579 Brian Smith (owner) Tom Jones- 305 Wilkins Road 9. Smith&Wesson 43-1 M60562 Pistol .22 12/1/02 84 Winsor 12/12/02 Metro Police Atchison, Kansas 70519 Cambridge, IL 60731 Certification Letter on File 10. Remington 870 4932 Shotgun 16 12/12/02 FFL 5-46-39988 Fit It or Melt it, Inc. 12/2/02 Thomas Problem 605 E. Colonial Bluff, IL 60651 11. ABC International Arms/ WASR-3H1 7117 Rifle .223 12/7/02 West Coast Importers, LLC 12/9/02 Matthew Johnson Form 4473#86 West Coast Importers, LLC FFL 3-68-87102 NOTE-Highlighted notations are optional. w Explanation of Acquisition Explanation of Dispositions 1. This entry shows the purchase of a firearm from a licensed dealer.You have the option of showing either the name and 1. This entry documents a sale to an unlicensed person.The buyer's name is inserted directly across from address or the name and license number of the licensee from whom the firearm was received.In order for the store owner, the firearm purchased.Brian Smith of Brian's Sport Shop files Form 4473 numerically,(see 27 C.F.R. Brian Smith,to obtain this firearm he had to submit a current copy of his FFL to John's Fine Guns(27 C.FR.§478.94). §478.124(b)for options)and lists the Form number in place of the address.Number"2"is the serial 4. This entry shows the purchase of a firearm from an unlicensed person. number of the Form 4473 that Mr.House filled out. 5. This entry documents a firearm that was brought in for repair.If a firearm is repaired and returned to the owner on the 2. This firearm has not been traded,sold,loaned,stolen or transferred out.It should be on hand and available same business day,no entry need be made.However,if the firearm cannot be returned that day it must be entered as an acquisition. Gunsmithing transactions may be recorded in a separate record that meets the regulatory requirements. for inspection. 7. This entry is for a firearm that Jon Doe brought in for a sale on consignment.Owner Brian Smith records the receipt of the 3. This entry documents a sale made at a gun show held in Mr.Smith's State.The applicable regulations do not firearm. require an FFL to specify in the A&D Book that a sale was made at a gun show(the gun show information 8. This entry covers the acquisition of a firearm from Mr.Michaels,who originally purchased this same firearm on 11/2/02 must be recorded on the ATF Form 4473).Mr.Smith opted to add this information for his own records. from Mr.Smith.(See line 3).Mr.Michaels did not like it and he returned it on 11/24/02.The firearm must be reentered 4. In this entry,Mr.Bounce borrows a firearm for temporary use off the premises of the licensee for lawful showing the date of the receipt and from whom it was received.(It was received from Michaels on 11124102) The original entry on line 3 remains unchanged. sporting purposes.It is not a sale but it is a disposition. Form 4473 must be filled out.(See 27 C.F.R. §478.97for information regarding loans and rentals by clubs.)When Mr.Bounce returns the firearm it 9. Brian Smith,owner of the licensed business,has a personal firearm he wants to sell.He must enter the firearm into the must be shown as an acquisition. book and show the acquisition date as the date it was put up for sale. 10.This entry documents a firearm that was sent to Fix It or Melt It,Inc.,for repair on 6/20/02.(See line 5).It was returned to 5. In this entry,Mr.Smith is unable to repair the firearm brought in by Mr.Problem and sends it to a gunsmith Mr.Smith's shop and reentered in the A&D record book on 12/2/02. for repair.Gunsmiths must be licensed and Brian's Sport Shop must obtain a current certified copy of Fix It 11.This entry documents the names of both the foreign manufacturer and the domestic importer,which are both required to be or Melt It,Inc.'s license prior to delivery of the firearm. marked on an imported firearm. 6. This entry documents the removal of a firearm from inventory into the owner's personal collection. Mr.Smith,the sole proprietor of Brian's Sport Shop,takes a firearm from inventory as his own personal firearm.(The applicable regulations do not require an FFL to use the specific notation"Personal Collec- tion"as Mr.Smith did.Mr.Smith opted to use this notation for additional clarity.)Since this is a disposi- tion to the licensee,and since Mr.Smith's business is a sole proprietorship,a Form 4473 is not necessary. When this happens,the firearm must be either removed from the business premises,or,if kept on the busi- ness premises,must be identified as not being part of the FFL's business inventory by displaying a tag reading"NOT FOR SALE."If the FFL is a partnership or corporate entity,and an inventory firearm is being transferred to an individual non-licensed partner or corporate officer,then Form 4473 must be completed and the transfer must be fully documented. 7. This entry documented a firearm brought in by Jon Doe for sale on consignment that was not sold.Form 4473 must be completed by Jon Doe when the firearm is returned to him. 8. This entry reflects that a firearm was stolen.The entry shows the disposition of the firearm as"stolen" and shows the date the theft was reported to the local authorities.If Brian Smith had known the actual date the firearm was stolen,he would have recorded it here.If the police case number is available,please report it here.Notification of ATF is required within 48 hours of discovering the missing firearm.When ATF is notified,it will provide the licensee with a control number.This number should be placed in the disposi- tion record.It is also helpful to include the date ATF was contacted.A copy of the ATF Form 3310.11 (Federal Firearms Licensee Theft/Loss Report)must also be retained by the licensee. 9. This entry records a transaction in which a firearm was sold to an out-of-State policeman for official use,as evidenced by the certification letter.See instructions on"Sale to Law Enforcement Officers"for specific information.The applicable regulations do not require an FFL to specifically notate that a police department certification is on file. Mr.Smith opted to use this notation for his own records. 10. This entry reflects that Mr.Problem got his repaired firearm back.He did not need to fill out Form 4473. The firearm was returned to the same person who brought the firearm in for repair.If someone picked the firearm up for Mr.Problem a Form 4473 would have to be completed by that person(27 C.F.R. §478.124(a)). 11. This entry documents a sale to a corporation.The authorized person purchasing the firearm on behalf of the corporation must complete the Form 4473,with his/her personal information and undergo a NICS check. U.B.DepenmmtofdmNee OMB Nn.II -000310E_..iii U.S.Deperrmevt of 3nstice OMB o.1140.0030 N Burcnuofrlleoh.l,TObacco.F.......d Explosives Report of Multiple Sale or Other Bureau ofAlcohol.Tobacco.Firearms end Explosives FirearmsTransactionRecordPartI- Disposition of Pistols and Revolvers Over-the-Counter (Please cvmplNe all m(ormetlav) NING:YOUmey nor receiveafirearm ifproM1ibitetl by Pederel or Amt elan'.Theinfnrmationyouprohi will Transferor's Trmmmion I.Date Trvneferretl 2a.Federal Firearms Li,,rnsee(FFL)Numbm uaaed to determine whether you are prohibitedunderlvw.rum receiving a firevrm,Certeivviolatiovs of the G.. sepal Number(/tarty/ Control Act.lA U.S.C.§9931 el seq.,are punishable by up m 10 years imprisonment andlor up to a SESO,o0o fine. 26.Business or Trade Name end AdMoss(Ifyw Foos omp(ere Infonnanon available on a nrbbusramy,plearepfa.e informan.n herz) Prepare in original only.All enbies most Fe M1antlwritten in ink.Read me Notices,Inmrucdona,and Definitions on Mis form."PLEASE PRWT." Section A-Must Be Completed Personally By Transferee(Buyer) Transferee's Full Name Last Numc First Name Middle Nama(I/no mWd(e mmz eNte"Nd1N"l Zc.le tMs fuewm wmtstedro mother multiply salaR(ffyee,ep�ah dote) E-]Yas EN. Dme Current Reside Ad,l, ress(Ii.S.Pomal abbreviations ere acceptable.Cmnot beapmt office 1, 2d.ifym sold thesefireanns slogan slmw.r.therquelifying even[,idemify tM event and pmvideeeompine edd.ess.fthe event. Number and Atreel Address City Counry Sm[e 111,d, 3. Any COmbinmiunuf Pisrolsond Revolvers Acquired in lM1C Las[Five Business Days lace Ofairth 4.Height 5.Weight 6.Cender ].6utn Date 'rype(1,s tar—h-) SarlalN bar Mmofectura Imp.nn Modal WliLer Disposition II.SPCitr end State -Oa-I Foreign Country F, (Lba/ Mele ❑ MonfM1 Day Ysr Date Pcmale❑ H. Social Security Numbu(OyROnvl.Fur wil(halp ymrnf rnislJemifiovdonl 9.Unique Pero..i ldmtifinetl.n Number(UP/N)if appt.c ]clSCr Inerrucfl.nsfvr Quesnan 9/ 10.Race(£Unialry/(Cheek orze or more bores.See lns(rvor[onsfor gueslron(0./ �Amencev Indian or Alaska Native ❑Black..African Amcncm ❑Native Hawaiim or Other Pacili<islander —NEI ❑Hispmic or Latiim ❑Asian ❑White mrfi-m (eem 'arts rhrw hlll.aM l2fa Ernnlclb en skin sm h.y "m Me b.xsfothe' mtlm a' Areyou the actual transferee/buyer of lhefirtarmisl listed on this fortnY Warning:Ynn ere not the actual buyer if you are Yes No xquiring the Breermfa)on behaB of an.mer pcnon.Dynu ore notthe umual huycr,rhedenler canmrtmnsferfhe firevrm(e ❑ ❑ 4. Tramfwoc's Nmne(Laer.first,middle) myou.ISer rrrarrvrflans,%or Qursr to /.aJ Lxcepdon_Flyou are pickin8 uporyraireYjrearm(f/nr anorhe+prrson.YOU are not aa , h.r vy.. 5. Rldo..Aress(Na mbarsrzlr/l,,,—O.sme,, mto aasnt s winear:altml.a m-at nod r mmr a m,mmen e d i tr r a m r a=o�m on rl.tr.ba. eemny...mr.M<r<nrna,tar wm<n Maindge,,.ma impnamr.n for vr, L s. Hava you evw bum cony d' y n oC (I y r avy othu f M h th j.g Id n c'p'sovad you for Yc Men one a rn if o ...................... rob 1/See n, ni! L d. Are YOU afueimefiom Justice! Yes EL Are YOU an unlawml user of,or addimed tu,marijuana or any deprcsmm,s imulant,narcmic d,.r any.Mcr connollcJ Substance? Yes BAmeneav lgdlm orAlaska Nat va "ASan ❑T{. R nor Pa rfclslmdn f Hava ba ad/d d 11 d f (h'A (J J orr 10 1 d rrn Ire.lull Ys No ABranAmen nnrBl ❑niapani<.rLarm ❑W ie ❑onar6yr=r) Mo n m f x Nf/rah r `.been ❑ ❑ 9. IdMEfiaa[im Number 9, Type°fldwftfr cgNan 10.m9[a[a II.Date ofBir[M1 12.PleceofBirM(C(ry.county,s(me.ro nxn,'/ m' dtoamenmlim' i Y Sea(lung r uasli.n ll.-) a U.-e y..been dks li.g,l the Armed Frees under tlish.mrable conditions? Ym No 13.Iftbe buyer of Me firearms lisredn item 4is avnfC auth°rind to-A.bchalfofacoryomtioq company.association pm[nemhipmother such h Are you subject to scow oNer resvaining you 5om harassing,stalkitrg,oc Mreetening yam mild arm intimate partner mcnild or Yes No bmivesS amity.you musroomplete Mefollowing: such pvfn9r'1(See lnsmiuransfvr Ques On 11A) ❑ ❑ Name and Address of BUSmesa EVtity i. Heve y.ue er barn c.nvteted in my coon ofa misdemeanor come of domes vi.lence�/See/rrs < na)Jr Que,rot I.i/ Yas No Heve you ever renowned your United Smtea cifixamhip? Yas 14a IL Ll ldmtify Me.tTicial designated by Me amts or local mthoritieswnea yon the FPL,will be b—ding a 2. k. Are you en alien Negaay in the United Blares? Yes NU NameofAyancY Strcet AdM<ax,Ciry,avd Sate - --- L Are you'a oi�mi�a�alian 415ee'naeruuforre,/Or Quesfion11.L)Ifyou answered"no"m lots grrrrtfon.do NOT respondm ❑ ❑ 146.Date Copy 2 wen POruarded to Agevey 12,If you 'gm I' d GII 'ttinmy of....epv.ns utf Minh .ill" - me Beemee mus! Yes N. IS.Addivovaimmtmelion RClmm mcTRVaferOfineFircWrae omplmq N 20d.)(S,,I 'r Quesnan 11)Ifquesflvn 1116 arvwe d 'n p .. en dv NOS ❑ ❑ 8r° rid ro u on 12 and ,e 11 a IT 13,What is yam State ofrosidance 14.What is yam eomby of cifi 1Elp?(List/check more Man 15.Ifyou are votasiSxdb M'lhc UVited Slates, ('luny)?(See/rvxrvcr.nsjr e,i(applirable.If—area citizen nf1h.United Slaress. wha[is your U.A.isSUtd alien number or 16.Name Of Employee FiaivgO his FOml 1].Dote This FOml Was COmple[rd Quesnan/3) mreedro yuesrion l6J ❑United States.fAmenca admission number? O[hcr(Spesffy/ r Edmvns Are Obsolete Transferee PAGE 7 BE to Nem Page onl ran t Whm Fax iv Avaimble,Please Faxtb IA]]-283-0288. x.vi:a morn swz Page I of 6 us STAPLE IF PAGES BECOME SEPARATED Ar,e.a Avgan xo0v MB U. 39(0]/31/3012) U.S.Depvrtmev[of 3umice O N 1140-00 Bureau ofAlcoha,Tobacco,Fix—,and Explosives Federal Firearms Licensee Firearms Inventory Theft/Loss Report Allen sr bar fnk..Plea e 1 and in re(ully beJbr omyle(ing rni.rj rm Bastian A-Federal Flreerms Licensee I--d- I,,—FiLicense Nwvb<r Feduml Pfamms Licmeee Telephone Number((nchrde area wde) Trada/COrpomra Nam,, Suet Add,—.f deral FbA.—Llcmtsce City Blare Zip Code Tiklb rte Nnmb<r1-1A area code/ Full Name of Person Making Report Street Address of Perron Making Report City Smte Zip Coda Telephone Npmber(1111 area code) Section B-T hILOSS 1--fl- 1,1 Time Description oflncident U.b, The L..Discovered �Bmgiary �RObbery Police N.tifiratmn LLmceny Missing inv nrory JATF Issued Ivcidnvf Number ATFNONfil.U.n Nome of Local Authority to Whom Reported IF.,1—glary,larceny....bbery,include lbe police sport numb.,and officer/derenive name). Street Address of Local Authority Thep Location if Different from FFL Premises Ciry stare Zip Code City S[am Zip COdc Name and Tcleph.vu Number ofnc�ATF Rcprcacnrative Notified({/thin repar(is rbr iveulx stun ATFenmp(]ance MapeuiOn,pravYe the name and te(ephonrnumbar fUe ATF/nspecror-) BriePDes p not lvcidevt(e.g..Nawfireunns wr�e sro(en,etc J: Section C-Description of Flrearma Acquisitim Type Mmbfectuar Mndcl Celiberl Serial Number Date Cau CertiBCatiov reby certify I—the inf.rmvtioo c.n[vnetl W this report n true vnd correct 1 rho undmatmd mot fvtlnre to report the-ft-I- "I Drevrm from my invento,..collecriov-M.48 Soon of the diu.very of 1M1e--al is a violation of 18 U.S.C.§9231g1(6)punBh- able v vlel.n. Signature of Licenvec Dalc 15 ATF Fact Sheet -FFL Compliance Inspections Page 1 of 2 ,ATF Fact Sheet = y At The Frontline Against Violent Crim Public Affairs Division—Washington,D Contact: ATF Public Affairs Division March 2012 (202) 648-8500 www.atf.gov FFL COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONS The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), pursuant to the Gun Control Act(GCA) and the Federal firearms regulations, is responsible for licensing persons engaging in a firearms business. With certain exceptions, the GCA allows ATF to conduct one warrantless, annual compliance inspection of a federal firearms licensee (FFL). The purpose of the inspection program is to educate the licensee about regulatory responsibilities and to evaluate the level of compliance. Compliance inspections also serve to protect the public in that they promote voluntary internal controls to prevent and detect diversion of firearms from lawful commerce to the illegal market. During inspections, ATF industry operations investigators (IOI)review records, inventory, and the licensee's conduct of business. To assist in meeting and maintaining compliance, investigators also provide instructional and educational materials about the requirements of the law and regulations and best business practices. There were approximately 65,000 FFLs engaged in business in fiscal year 2011 (excluding persons holding collector licenses). During that time,ATF conducted more than 13,100 firearms compliance inspections. About 50 percent of the licensees inspected were determined to be in full compliance with the law and regulations and no violations were cited. Approximately 71 federal firearms licenses were revoked or were denied renewal due to willful violations of the GCA. This figure is approximately .54 percent of the number of licensees inspected. Compliance failures, which constitute violations of law and regulation, commonly disclosed during the inspection process include failure to verify purchaser eligibility; inability to account for firearms received and disposed; failure to ensure firearms traceability due to improper recordation of firearms receipt and disposition; failure to properly document firearms transfers; and failure to report multiple sales of handguns. These types of violations, among others, can hinder the FFL's ability to support law enforcement criminal investigation efforts. Proper and timely recordkeeping by FFLs is critical to the success of a crime gun trace and is required for all firearms acquired and transferred by licensees. Failing to account for firearms is a serious public safety concern because unaccounted for firearms cannot be traced. During compliance inspections conducted in fiscal year 2011, ATF investigators identified nearly 177,500 unaccounted for firearms, which FFLs could not locate in inventory or account for by sale or other disposition. By working with industry members, IOIs reduced this number to about 18,500 unaccounted for firearms. http://www.atf.gov/publications/factsheets/factsheet-M-compliance.httnl 5/2/2012 ATF Fact Sheet -FFL Compliance Inspections Page 2 of 2 As such, ATF investigators improved the success rate of potential firearms traces of previously unaccounted firearms significantly. While this is a great improvement,with more than 18,500 firearms still missing a significant threat is posed to public safety. When violations of the law and regulations are disclosed during an inspection, a Report of Violations is issued to the licensee that outlines the discrepancy and the requirements for corrective action. ATF also works to gain cooperation and compliance from FFLs by issuing warning letters and holding warning conferences. Despite these remedial actions, on rare occasions ATF encounters a licensee who fails to comply with the law and regulations and demonstrates a lack of commitment to improving his or her business practices. In such cases where willfulness is demonstrated, ATF's obligation to protect public safety may require revocation of the federal firearms license. ATF investigators assist licensees in developing corrective actions when violations are identified, and encourage licensees to constructively engage in the remediation process. In this way, ATF attempts to bring licensees into compliance before it becomes necessary to take administrative action against the licensee. When an ATF inspection results in a warning conference or potential revocation, the licensee is provided an opportunity to develop a written plan that details the steps taken to correct the problems identified and measures implemented to ensure future compliance. ATF's focus is to help licensees avoid violations of the law and its implementing regulations. The Bureau prides itself on partnering with the firearms industry, especially regarding voluntary internal controls, to better protect the public. To that end, ATF continues to work closely with the firearms industry at all levels to ensure compliance, understand concerns, and help resolve perceived obstacles to compliance. ATF strives to educate licensees concerning their obligations under the law through open letters mailed to FFLs, information posted on ATF's Web site, quarterly FFL newsletters, industry seminars, attendance at trade shows, and partnerships with industry associations. Licensees are provided the "Federal Firearms Regulations Reference Guide,"which includes laws, regulations, and other information about conducting a firearms business under federal law, and other publications such as the "Safety and Security Information for Federal Firearms Licensees." http://www.atf.gov/publications/factsheets/factsheet-M-compliance.html 5/2/2012 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION PC 2012-03 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, is proposing to amend Title 10, Chapter 8, Article A the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and Article B the M-2 General Manufacturing District, of the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance to permit as a special use and provide regulations for indoor shooting galleries/ranges; and to also add as a permitted use the manufacturing of firearms and ammunition within those Manufacturing Districts. Copies of the proposed ordinance are on file with the City Clerk. You are further notified that the proposed ordinance may be changed, modified, amended or redrafted in its entirety after the public hearing. NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the Plan Commission for the United City of Yorkville will conduct a public hearing on said application on Wednesday, May 9, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. at the Yorkville City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. The public hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice being published. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. Any written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville City Clerk, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560, and will be accepted up to the date of the public hearing. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. BETH WARREN City Clerk BY: Lisa Pickering Deputy Clerk APPROVED W/ CORRECTIONS 7/11/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION City Council Chambers Wednesday, June 13, 2012 7:00pm Commission Members in Attendance: Chairman Tom Lindblom Sandra Adams James Weaver Charles Kraupner Art Prochaska Jack Jones Absent: Michael Crouch, Jeff Baker, Jane Winninger Other City Staff Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Other Guests— Angie Phipps, Depo Court Meeting Called to Order Chairman Tom Lindblom called the meeting to order at 7pm. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Previous Meeting Minutes April 11, 2012 The minutes were approved as read on a motion by Adams and Kraupner. Voice vote approval. Citizen's Comments None Public Hearings 1. PC 2012-03 United City of Yorkville is proposing to amend Title 10, Chapter 8,Article A the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and Article B the M-2 General Manufacturing District, of the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance to permit as a special use and provide regulations for indoor shooting galleries/ranges; and to also add as a permitted use the manufacturing of firearms and ammunition within those Manufacturing Districts. A motion was made by Jones and seconded by Prochaska to enter into Public Hearing. Voice vote approval. Chairman Lindblom read the proposal aloud. Since no one from the public was in attendance for the Public Hearing, a motion was made by Prochaska and seconded by Jones to close the Public Hearing. Voice vote approval. 1 Old Business none New Business 1. PC 2012-03 (same as above) Ms. Barksdale-Noble said this case is a text amendment and accomplishes 2 things: 1. Amends the M1 and M2 districts to permit indoor shooting galleries/ranges as a special use. 2. Amends the same manufacturing districts to allow the manufacture of firearms and ammunition as a permitted use. Staff members, the police and other towns provided feedback and staff members provided 7 recommendations: 1. To amend the title to identify indoor shooting galleries, gun ranges as a special use within the M 1 and M2 manufacturing districts. 2. To incorporate new definition for shooting gallery or range indoor as follows: enclosed facility, public or private, specifically to provide a place to discharge various types of firearms, air guns or archery equipment at designated targets and designed to contain all projectiles fired. Auxiliary training and classroom facilities may also be provided and allow ancillary retail sales of firearms, ammunition and associated products upon proof of all licensing. 3. Require a minimum building setback of 50 feet from any property line or indoor shooting gallery gun range facilities. 4. Require minimum of 2 parking spaces per fire lane, 1 per staff member, 8 spaces for each instructional classroom, plus all other applicable parking requirements 5. Amend both titles to identify manufacture of firearms as a permitted use and to add a definition for manufacture of firearms and ammunition 6. Amend Title 10-2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance to include the following definitions: Manufacturer, Firearms and Ammunition: Any person or entity engaged in(A)the business of transporting, shipping and receiving firearms and ammunition for the purpose of sale or distribution (B) selling firearms at wholesale or retail, (C) repairing firearms or of making or fitting special barrels, stocks, or trigger mechanisms to firearms and operating under the provisions of the applicable local, state and federal licenses. 7. Require retail operation be ancillary to the indoor gun range with no more than 25% of the floor area. The floor was then opened for questions. Commissioner Prochaska asked why this matter was being relegated to manufacturing district in view of the manufacturing definition. Since the sale of ammunition is reserved for manufacturing, he asked how any store could open anywhere else. Ms. Barksdale-Noble said the sale is not being restricted to manufacturing, rather it allows sales to occur there. The sales are also allowed in the business district. Krysti said she was approached by a local business last year about obtaining their Federal Firearms License (FFL) for a shooting gallery/instructional area and there was no mechanism in place. Another resident requested the same operation in a residential area, however, the City does not want this use tied to a residence. The licenses also have various levels. Mr. Prochaska asked if there is a benefit to prevent someone in this type 2 of business, from being in the business district. Krysti said she could add business district as being allowed to have a shooting gallery, to the text amendment if the Commissioners wished. Chairman Lindblom agreed with this. It was decided to continue this matter to the next meeting to allow for the revisions to be made. Mr. Prochaska moved and Mr. Jones seconded the motion to continue PC 2012-03 to the July meeting. Voice vote approval. 2. Development Applications and Plan Commission Procedures for Findings of Fact Krysti said there were discussions in the past to amend the development forms. These revisions would allow petitioners to write their answers to the standards for variations and special uses which would provide a written record. Staff will revise all the applications. The Commission agreed this would be beneficial. Mr. Prochaska said it allows the petitioner to know upfront what is needed and Chairman Lindblom said it places the responsibility on the petitioner. Additional Business Ms. Barksdale-Noble will provide Rt. 47 updates in an email and IDOT will provide updates as the project moves along farther. Adiournment There was no further business and Prochaska moved and Jones seconded the motion to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 7:20pm Respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS PLAN COMMISSION MEETING PUBLIC HEARING 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois Wednesday, June 13, 2012 7 : 00 p .m. reporting service 1300 Iroquois Avenue,Suite 145 Naperville,IL 60563 630-983-0030• Fax: 630-778-4824 Email: depocourt@depocourt.com•www.depocourt.com 2 1 PRESENT : 2 Mr . Tom Lindblom, Chairman, 3 Mr . Art Prochaska, 4 Mr . Charles Kraupner, 5 Ms . Sandra Adams, 6 Mr . James Weaver . 7 8 9 ALSO PRESENT : 10 Ms . Krysti Noble, Community Development 11 Director; 12 Ms . Marlys Young, Minute Taker . 13 - - - 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc. (630) 983-0030 3 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: For the record, I would 2 entertain a motion for public hearing, PC 2012-03 . 3 MR. PROCHASKA: So moved. 4 MR. WEAVER: Second. 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Moved and seconded. 6 Comments on the motion? Opposed? 7 (No response . ) 8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: For the record, let me 9 read the notice on this . PC 2012-03 , United City of 10 Yorkville is proposing to amend Title 10 , Chapter 8 , 11 Article A, the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and 12 Article B, the M-2 General Manufacturing District, of 13 the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance to permit as a special 14 use and provide regulations for indoor shooting 15 galleries/ranges; and to also add as a permitted use 16 the manufacturing of firearms and ammunition within 17 those Manufacturing Districts . 18 With that, I don ' t see anyone here for the 19 public hearing . I suspect we can close the public 20 hearing, and we can discuss this . 21 MR. PROCHASKA: Move to close the public 22 hearing. 23 MS . ADAMS : Second. 24 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Moved and seconded to DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc. (630) 983-0030 4 1 close public hearing . All in favor, say aye . 2 (A chorus of ayes . ) 3 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: The public hearing is 4 closed. 5 (Which were all the 6 proceedings had. ) 7 ---000-- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc. (630) 983-0030 5 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS . 2 COUNTY OF KENDALL ) 3 I, Angela Phipps, a Certified Shorthand 4 Reporter for the State of Illinois, do hereby certify 5 that I reported in shorthand the proceedings had at the 6 hearing of the above-entitled cause and the foregoing 7 Report of Proceedings, Pages 1 through 4 , inclusive, is 8 a true, correct, and complete transcript of my 9 shorthand notes taken at the time and place aforesaid. 10 I further certify that I am neither counsel 11 for nor related to counsel for any of the parties to 12 these proceedings, nor am I in any way related to any 13 of the parties to these proceedings, nor am I in any 14 way interested in the outcome thereof . 15 I further certify that my certificate annexed 16 hereto applies to the original transcript and copies 17 thereof, signed and certified under my hand only. I 18 assume no responsibility for the accuracy of any 19 reproduced copies not made under my control . 20 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my 21 hand this 10th day of July, 2012 . 22 23 24 ANGELA PHIPPS, CSR CSR No . 084-003506 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc. (630) 983-0030 `� 13 fry Reviewed By: �� •s► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ City Council#1 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ CC 2012-56 A ��' Police F-1 LE Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: November Referendum Questions Meeting and Date: City Council—July 24, 2012 Synopsis: Selection of two referendum questions related to Parks and Recreation for the November general election. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid 1s36 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: July 19, 2012 C<wrMY Sad �LE ��'` Subject: November referendum questions Summary Discussion of various referendum questions for the November general election. Background This item was last discussed by the City Council under the Home Rule Referendum agenda item at the July 10th Committee of the Whole meeting. At that meeting, the City Council directed staff to suggest referendum language for a binding referendum on recreation facility construction(potentially in partnership with the YMCA) and for a non-binding referendum on the purchase of the REC Center. Further, this item has been discussed by the Adhoc Recreation Facility Alternatives Commiteee. This adhoc committee concluded their most recent meeting with a recommendation to the City Council to approve a non-binding referendum for construction of a recreation facility in partnership with the YMCA. As discussed by Alderman Funkhouser at the last Committee of the Whole meeting, the adhoc committee's recommendation was given under the assumption that a binding referendum for the same facility and partnership was not possible. Now that we have verified that a binding referendum for a recreation facility construction is possible, it can reasonably assumed that the adhoc committee would have recommended a binding referendum. As it stands though, the official recommendation was for a non-binding referendum on the recreation facility in partnership with the YMCA. This item was also discussed at the Park Board meeting on Thursday, July 12. At that meeting, the Park Board discussed the merits of binding and non-binding referenda questions for construction of a recreation facility with and without the YMCA. The current REC Center owner, Ron Walker, was present at the Park Board meeting and stated that he intended to keep any referendum question that did not pertain to the REC Center off the ballot—the inference being that he would litigate to do so. As stated in open session at the Park Board meeting, the REC Center lease agreement contains the following language in Section 16.14: "In the event the City purchases or builds a recreation facility, the purchase of Club 47 will receive precedent over the other building." It is both Attorney Orr's opinion and my opinion that our discussions related to binding and non-binding referendum questions for a recreation facility do not violate this section of the agreement. Because litigation has been threatened in open session, the City Council does have the right to discuss the litigation in closed session. The Park Board discussed the threat of litigation in executive session. After the executive session, the Park Board adopted the following recommendations, in order of preference (most to least): 1) We recommend the City buy the REC Center. 2) We recommend the City Council approve a binding referendum for the creation of a park district. If the City Council can not approve a binding referendum,we want a non-binding referendum. 3) We recommend a non-binding referendum on the REC Center purchase. 4) If either of the above recommendations are not accepted, we recommend a binding referendum for new construction. 5) We do not recommend a referendum for new construction that mentions a YMCA partnership. 6) We do not recommend two referendums that deal with construction and REC Center purchase on the same ballot. Since the Park Board meeting, we have determined that a binding referendum initiated by the City Council for a Park District is not possible under Illinois law. A summary of the appropriate law is attached, courtesy of Attorney Binninger. In short, the only way a Park District can be created is through citizen initiated petitions. Referendum question options The City is only allowed three referendum questions on each election ballot. A home rule binding referendum question is on the consent agenda for the City Council meeting, presumably leaving two slots. As stated above, the City Council requested a binding referendum question on a bond issuance for recreation facility construction(potentially in partnership with the YMCA), and a non-binding referendum on whether the City should purchase the existing REC Center. With that direction, we have attached two resolutions authorizing the following referendum questions (Option 1 and Option 2): Option 1: Binding Question Without YMCA Exact language of question: Shall the United City of Yorkville issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 bearing interest at a rate not to exceed the limitation of applicable law, for the purpose of constructing a recreation facility within the municipal boundaries of the United City of Yorkville? Analysis related to Option 1 This option gives the City the most flexibility, in that it does not specifically require the City to partner with the YMCA on the construction of a new facility. Staff recommends the question not refer to the YMCA singularly and explicitly within the language because an agreement with the YMCA has not yet been struck, and a partnership with the school district may be possible. Further, if a partnership with either of those two organizations does not prove fruitful, this option would allow the City to partner with other organizations or construct a facility alone. For this option, staff suggested a $4,000,000 bond issuance because that's the amount most frequently mentioned by the Adhoc Recreation Facility Committee and the City Council at the most recent Committee of the Whole meeting, and it's the midpoint of the cost range of a new facility as suggested by the YMCA. The cost range of a new facility with the YMCA was discussed in a 2007 partnership proposal (attached), and ranged from $6,000,000 to $10,000,000 in 2007 construction dollar value. With the YMCA partnership, the assumption has been that the facility construction costs would be split 50150 with the YMCA. It should be noted that the $4,000,000 figure in this question may be amended by City Council to any dollar value they wish. Accordingly, we have attached debt service schedules for a$3 million, $4 million, $5 million and $6 million bond issuances. A $3 million bond would result in a property tax increase of—$38 per year on a house with a fair market value of $250,000. A $4 million bond would result in a property tax increase of—$51 per year, a $5 million bond at—$64 per year, and a $6 million bond at $77 per year, all on a$250,000 fair market value house. A property tax calculator spreadsheet is available at the bottom of the Parks and Recreation department webpage http://www.yorkville.il.us/depts parks�aboutUs.php. If the City Council chooses to change the $4,000,000 bond issuance suggestion, I offer the following facts: 1) The REC Center appraisal,provided in the June 26th City Council meeting packet, estimated the cost of constructing the REC Center as a new building (same layout) on the same site at $5.7 million. 2) PHN Architects advertises a recreation facility of 35,000 s.£ for$5.9 million (handout attached). Option 2: Non-binding question for purchase of REC Center Exact language of question: Should the United City of Yorkville purchase the Rec Center to operate as a public recreation facility through an installment purchase contract payable with revenues generated from its operation? Analysis related to Option 2: This question is a simple non-binding referendum question,used to gauge the residents opinion of whether the City should purchase the REC Center. Staff recommends that this non- binding referendum question not be put on the ballot opposite Option 1, as we think the presence of two recreation facility questions on the same ballot will be confusing. Park Board agreed with this recommendation. If the City Council chooses this question, we do not recommend that the purchase price and interest rate be included in the question. Residents that are interested will be able to easily obtain the purchase price and the interest rate from the City website or news reports. We feel that including the purchase price and interest rate in the non-binding question will confuse residents into thinking that the question is a binding referendum question for a bond issuance, especially if it is on the ballot opposite a binding referendum question for a bond issuance. Other options for binding and non-binding referendum questions Option 3: Non-binding question on a park district Exact language of question: Would you support the creation of a Yorkville Park District within the limits of the school district boundary that has general taxing authority up to $0.12 per$100 EAV, with elected Park Board members, and an independent budget, removing Parks & Recreation from the United City of Yorkville budget? Analysis related to Option 3: As discussed above, a binding referendum for the creation of a park district is not possible under Illinois law. So, the next recommendation by the Park Board was to ask for a non-binding referendum on the creation of a park district. Option 4: Binding question with the YMCA Exact language of question: Shall the United City of Yorkville issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 bearing interest at a rate not to exceed the limitation of applicable law, for the purpose of constructing a recreation facility in joint partnership with the Fox Valley YMCA within the municipal boundaries of the United City of Yorkville? Analysis related to Option 4: This question is a variation on Option 1; it simply mandates that the bond issuance for the facility be spent in partnership with the YMCA. If the referendum is approved, the City would have to come to terms with the YMCA for a joint partnership—otherwise no bond money could be spent. Also similar to option 1, the City Council could choose to change the $4,000,000 figure to any amount of their choosing. Option 5: Non-binding question without the YMCA Exact language of question: Should the United City of Yorkville construct and operate a recreation facility within the municipal boundaries of the United City of Yorkville,paid for by the issuance of general obligation bonds in an amount of$4,000,000 which will result in an estimated property tax rate increase of$0.06551 per $100 EAV? Analysis related to Option 5 This question is the non-binding version of Option 1. The simple switch of the beginning word"shall"to "should"renders the question as non-binding. For this question, we would also propose to add an estimated property tax rate calculation. Option 6: Non-binding question with the YMCA Exact language of the question Should the United City of Yorkville jointly construct, operate, and fund a recreation facility with the Fox Valley YMCA paid for by the issuance of general obligation bonds in an amount of$4,000,000 which will result in an estimated property tax rate increase of$0.06551 per$100 EAV? Analysis related to Option 6 This question is the non-binding version of Option 4. Recommendation In summary, staff recommends that Option 1 and Option 3 be approved. For Option l,we have proposed the figure of a$4,000,000 bond issuance, but make no specific recommendation for that amount or any other amount. We have recommended Option 3 (non-binding park district question) over Option 2 (non-binding REC Center purchase question)because we feel that the presence two questions addressing recreation facilities will be too confusing (which would be the case if Option 1 and Option 2 are chosen). Further, Yorkville is somewhat of an anomaly in that we are not served by a park district, but rather a parks and recreation department. The natural progression of a suburbanized municipality has trended toward the creation of a park district, even as current local and national discussions have trended towards less government and less governmental entities. Additional materials for your consideration For your consideration of this agenda item, staff has also attached the following memos and attachments, and will be prepared to speak about each in detail at the meeting: 1) An analysis by Director Schraw on the value of recreation programming and the potential costs of recreation programming under various scenarios. a. This analysis includes articles from various websites, and a detailed spreadsheet of the cost analysis. 2) A referendum outcome analysis memo from Administrative Intern Weckbach. a. This analysis includes a summary and detail of every parks and recreation related referendum since 2000, information from the most recent City services survey(2012) and the Parks and Recreation services survey from (2007). 3) A comparison of classes offered by the YMCA and the City's recreation department (spreadsheet) 4) A list of classes offered by the City's recreation department prior to the lease of the REC Center. This list contains information on which facility that class was located in prior to the City taking over the REC Center, and a best guess from us on where the class will be located if the REC Center is not available to the City. Resolution No. 2012- A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE ELECTORS OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, A REFERENDUM OF WHETHER THE CITY SHOULD ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING A RECREATION FACILITY WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City has been discussing the possibility of constructing a recreation facility and, in order to proceed, the City would be required to issue its General Obligation Bonds to pay the costs to be incurred by constructing such a facility; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8-4-1 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/8-4-1) no bonds shall be issued by the corporate authorities of any municipality until the question of authorizing such bonds has been submitted to the electors of that municipality in accordance with Section 12-5 of the Illinois Election Code (10 ILCS 5/12-5); and, WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the best interests of its residents to submit to referendum the question of whether the City shall issue its General Obligation Bonds to construct a recreational facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The City Council finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and includes the recitals in this Resolution. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that it is in the best interests of the City to provide for a referendum to allow the voters to determine whether the City should issue its General Obligation Bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 to construct a recreation facility. Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to immediately certify and submit the following question to the Kendall County Clerk to be placed on the ballot for the general election to be held on November 6, 2012, in the following form: "Shall the United City of Yorkville issue General Obligation Bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000 bearing interest at a rate not to Yes exceed the limitation of applicable law, for the purpose of constructing a recreation facility within the municipal boundaries of the United City of No Yorkville?" Section 4. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. Dated this day of 52012. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2012. CHRIS FUNKHOUSER GEORGE T. GILSON,JR. CARLO COLOSIMO DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS LARRY KOT Mayor Attest: City Clerk 2 Resolution No. 2012- A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE ELECTORS OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS,A NON-BINDING REFERENDUM OF WHETHER THE CITY SHOULD BUY THE REC CENTER WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City has been renting the Rec Center and, through its Department of Parks and Recreation, has been operating the Rec Center as the location for a majority of its recreational programs; and, WHEREAS, as the tenant of the Rec Center, in addition to the rent, the City has been responsible to pay all real estate taxes due and owing on the facility; and, WHEREAS, the City has been advised that the costs of the operation of the Rec Center could be paid by revenue from such operations if the City entered into a contract to purchase the Rec Center rather than pay rent and taxes; and, WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the best interests of its residents to submit to referendum the question of whether the City should purchase the Rec Center and continue to use it as a public recreation facility. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The City Council finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and includes the recitals in this Resolution. Section 2. The City Council finds and determines that it is in the best interests of the City to provide for a non-binding referendum to allow the voters to voice their opinion on whether the City should purchase the Rec Center to operate as a public recreation facility. Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to immediately certify and submit the following question to the Kendall County Clerk to be placed on the ballot for the general election to be held on November 6, 2012, in the following form: "Should the United City of Yorkville purchase the Rec Center to Yes operate as a public recreation facility through an installment purchase contract payable with revenues generated from its operation?" No Section 4. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as required by law. Dated this day of 12012. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2012. CHRIS FUNKHOUSER GEORGE T. GILSON,JR. CARLO COLOSIMO DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS LARRY KOT Mayor Attest: City Clerk 2 Creation of a Park District pursuant to the Park District Code (70 ILCS 1205/1-1 et seq.) All section references are to the Park District Code 1. The proposed park district must be a contiguous area that must include not less than all of the territory of the Village (2-1 and 2-2.2) 2. A petition to form the district must be signed by not less then 100 legal voters (a person qualified (1-6) to vote) residing within the proposed district(2-2) 3. The petition must also clearly define the territory intended to be included in the district and an affidavit that notice of the intent to petition for the formation of a park district has been published(2-2) A petition was held deficient were legal description of territory was described as all the territory in another governmental body. (People ex rel. Hickman v. Dallape, App. 1970, 119 111. App.2d 456, 256 N.E.2d 110) 4. The notice of intent to petition for the formation of the park district must be published as required by the Election Code at least 122 days but not more than 152 days (10 ILCS 5/28-2)prior to the election 5. The petition is filed in the Circuit Court with a plat of survey of the legal boundaries of the proposed district. The Court sets a date for a public hearing on the request 30-180 days after the date of filing. Notice of the hearing is published once in a newspaper having a general circulation in the proposed district. (2-3) 6. If the Judge finds that the petition has met the requirements of the Park District Code an order is entered setting the question for referendum and for the election of 5 commissioners. (2-4) 7. Nomination petitions for the initial election are filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court with signatures of not less than 25 voters within the time prescribed by the Election Code. (2-9) 8. The Circuit Court performs a canvass of returns and enters judgment as to the results (2-6) 9. The 5 elected park commissioners decide by lot which 2 serve for 6 years, which 2 serve for 4 years and which serves for 1 year(2-10) 10. The commissioners must adopt an annual budget and appropriation ordinance within or before the first quarter of the fiscal year with 30 days for public inspection and a public hearing after published notice (4-4) 11. Unlike other special district statutes that provide for the transfer of liabilities and property from municipality to district, the Park District Code does not include any such requirements. There is in Section 5-2a(which is attached) a procedure by which a district may request of a municipality to assume all "planning, establishing and maintaining of the municipal recreation program within the boundaries of the Park District." The municipality then must agree to transfer its recreational functions and its tax levy, if any, for recreational purposes to the District. The transfer than occurs within 6 months. This process is based on mutual agreement and cannot force transfer of debt or property. The new district would have the power to issue bonds and to accept conveyance of property from a municipality. Taxing Powers. 1. The County Clerk cannot extend a levy, not including bonded indebtedness, unless otherwise provided for in the Park District Code at a rate more than .10% or rate limitation in effect on July 1, 1967 (5-1) 2. A district can levy a tax not to exceed .12%but no tax in excess of.075%without referendum approval (5-2) 3. The commissioners adopt an ordinance of intent to assume municipal recreational programs and assume the municipal tax rate which cannot be more than .09%. The Village then adopts an ordinance relinquishing all municipal recreation programs and its recreation tax levy. Within six months the district assumes the Village's recreational functions and the Village turns over all funds and tax monies from its recreation tax. This tax is in addition to all other taxes levied by the district. (5-2a) "1205/5-2a. Playground and recreation commission; merger and assumption of functions by park districts § 5-2a. Whenever a Park District contains within the boundaries of the district, the greater portion of the area of a city, village or incorporated town, the population of which city, village or incorporated town constitutes a majority of the population of the Park District, and which city, village or incorporated town levies and collects a tax for recreation purposes under the provisions of Division 95 of Article 11 of the Illinois Municipal Code,the functions of the Playground and Recreation Commission may be merged with, and assumed by,the Park District in the following manner: The Park Commissioners shall adopt an ordinance, by a vote of not less than 2/3 of the commissioners, which ordinance shall set forth the intent of the Park District to assume the planning, establishing and maintaining of the municipal recreation program within the boundaries of the Park District, and to levy and collect a tax at a rate not to exceed that levied by the city, village, or incorporated town, which rate shall not exceed .09% of the value, as equalized or assessed by the Department of Revenue, of all taxable property in the district for such purposes. Then the Secretary of the Park District shall mail a certified copy of the ordinance to the city, village or incorporated town. In the event the governing board of the city, village or incorporated town sees fit, they may adopt an ordinance, by a vote of not less than 2/3 of the members, which ordinance shall set forth that the city, village or incorporated town relinquishes all control and management of the planning, establishing and maintaining of the municipal recreation program within its boundaries to the Park District and relinquishes its tax levy for recreation purposes. Upon the adoption of the ordinance by the city,village or incorporated town, and 6 months from the date of adoption of the ordinance, the Park District shall assume the functions previously performed by the city, village or incorporated town through its playground and recreation commission, or other board or commission designated by the city, village or incorporated town; whereupon the Park District shall have the power and authority to levy and collect a tax of not to exceed that rate previously levied by the city, village or incorporated town for recreational purposes, the rate of tax not to exceed .09% of the value as equalized or assessed by the Department of Revenue, of all taxable property in the district for the purpose of planning, establishing and maintaining recreation programs, such programs to include playgrounds, community and recreation centers. The tax shall be levied and collected in like manner as the general taxes for the district. The tax to be levied under this Section shall be in addition to all other taxes authorized by law to be levied and collected in such district and shall not be included within any limitation of rate contained in this Code or any other law, but shall be excluded therefrom and be in addition thereto and in excess thereof. A Pleasure Driveway and Park District that before 1964 assumed the functions of a municipal Playground and Recreation Commission and has continuously performed those functions may levy and collect the tax authorized by this Section at a rate not to exceed 0.09%and shall not be limited to the rate previously levied by the city,village,or incorporated town for recreational purposes. The city,village or incorporated town shall thereupon,6 months from the date of adoption of the ordinance, turn over to the Park District any and all funds and tax monies in its possession on the date upon which funds were received by it from the"Playground and Recreation Tax"and shall from time to time thereafter turn over to the Park District all such funds and tax monies as shall be received from levies adopted prior to the effective date of the merger.At such time as these funds shall be received by it,the funds are to be paid to the treasurer of the Park District and kept in a fund to be known as the "Recreational Program Fund" pursuant to the provisions of Section 5-2." Q Fox Valley Family YMCA East Branch Partnership Proposal for the United City Of Yorkville o EST 1836 lei Fox Valley Family if 1 YMCA K — cam 4p AIL NML V Family YMCA-Fast Branch C13 ROG r�AH.CL ARK 4 ASSOC I A US 14r "We build strong kids, strong families, strong communities. " 2 YMCA Mission ` A R I N = "To put Christian principles into 0 practice through programs that � N build a healthy spirit, mind, and .. body for all. ff RESPONSIBILITY Park and Recreation Board Mission "To act in unison with the United City of ,roRK��E Yorkville goals and to enhance the 4 recreation opportunities for the residents " PARKS 6, RECRFrITToN 4 .4 acre donation of Land from MPI, LLC F I w MEM9,1101 074 J Y •y r ' Makc is U j,iml C 4m ,c y i(630J552-4100 FOX NALLEY FAWLY YMCA EAST BRANCH s i ��f I 0 40,000 square foot facility Phase 1 Will consist of a fitness center, aerobics room, kids zone, multi-purpose rooms, preschool room, and locker rooms f 1 I - 5 Phase 2 Will consist of a warm water, zero-depth family recreational / instructional pool rv- _ r ' 6 Phase 3 Will consist of a 1 . 5 full court indoor gymnasium ............ '00000" 1 1.5 Full Court Gymnasium Top three facilities and amenities d by Yorkville residents, according to the 2003 Park and Recreation Master Plan : 1 . ) Outdoor Aquatics Center 2 . ) Indoor Pool 3 . ) Multi-purpose rooms Indoor Basic Pool Gymnasium Multipurpose Rooms Outdoor Aquatics Center Outdoor Basic Pool Picnic Shelter 0 2.0 2. 1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3.0 Mean Rating (4 is highest) Meetings,, committees past City of Yorkville ,k Jason Leslie 4 Debbie Horaz Dave Mogle 1 _ 37PAy', Wi. x S, YMCA Becky Morphey Stan Free 4 Andrew Bobbitt 9 . . . led to the following ideas • Outdoor Aquatics Center - Raging Waters " • Fitness Center & Multi-purpose rooms - Fox Valley Family YMCA • Indoor Pool - United City of Yorkville andthe Fox Valley Family YMCA Other coitmies that have partnered wmith YMCA UV p I _ The YMCA's Gig Harbor Aquatic Center just I ' , got bigger! Thanks to a collaboration iI with the PenMet Park District and the If_w ji If ,w l _ City of Gig Harbor, the YMCA of Tacoma- Pierce County expanded its construction plans IC lI II to include an aquatic complex. Ir I li II II ti�J�l` 4 _d The West Family YMCA and Boise City Aquatic Center was built in 1995. This facility is a - - unique partnership between the YMCA and the City of Boise. The Aquatic Center is owned $ - by the City and is operated by the YMCA. . Amenities Swimming: 50 meter swimming pool, training pool, 2 water slides, kiddie pool with slides and other water toys, hydrotherapy pool ' - �, Benefits to Yorkville Residents • Discounted aquatic center usage as was done with the outdoor pool • Residents pay same price as YMCA members for all aquatics programs t I M Primary Per Kelly Kost of Chapman & Cutler LLP Through an alternate bond with a re ment from City' erati n pY s operating g Y ears over budget 20 Would not count towards the cit Y's debt limit / EST. 7836 -0-0 o Neither the YMCA or the City can afford to both build and run a pool of this kind . . . "Teamwork divides the task and doubles the success. " ^/ Orrin Woodward "The whole is greater than thesum of its parts. " 1 Or. Russell L. Ackoff Let"s ive Yorkville residents the pool they want and deserve . J O k a ssr. 1 �_...__ 1836 LE 15 YDiiKVLLIE r� PaRKs&RE[REMCN Yorkville Parks & Recreation Dept. 201 West Hydraulic Street- Yorkville,IL 60560 630.553.4357 630.553.4360 fax e-mail:recreation @yorkville.11.us June 8, 2007 Mr. Andrew Bobbitt, Executive Director Fox Valley Family YMCA 3875 Eldamain Rd. Piano, IL 60545 Dear Andrew, am writing to inform you of the discussion among Park Board members at the May 10, 2007 Park Board meeting concerning the proposed YMCA/City partnership. In doing so, I will try to clarify the conclusion that we have made concerning a joint venture to construct an indoor recreational pool/water play area at the YMCA's East Branch, on Kennedy Road in Yorkville. That conclusion is to not recommend going forth with the partnership. First, the Park Board collectively, and I personally, appreciate the discussions we have held over the past several months concerning a possible YMCA/City partnership. When you visited a Park Board meeting late last fall,the Park Board encouraged us to"keep talking,"and at the same time began to consider both pros and cons of the partnership. Secondly, the Board and staff do recognize there are potential benefits in a partnership endeavor as described in the partnership proposal that you developed. However, present circumstances exist that we believe make the proposed YMCA/City partnership to construct the pool impractical. First is the cost. Research that you and I conducted generated preliminary cost projections from architectural firms ranging from 2.5 million dollars to eight million dollars. We are probably closer by suggesting a range in the middle,from four to six million dollars. While partnership discussions haven't specified on the split, it is fairly accurate to say the City would need to contribute two to three million dollars, or more. It is my understanding from the City's Finance Director and financial consulting firm that the ability of the City to issue bonds is very limited, if not impossible, at this time and in the near future. You have raised the question about a referendum. The Park Board's position on that direction is that there are multiple facility needs in the City and passing a referendum is a major undertaking, unlikely to be done on a frequent basis. It could be more strategic and desirable for the focus of a referendum to be directed toward several facility needs and not just a single one. The Paris Board has evaluated other projects that have been City priorities for a number of years that it believes are higher than an indoor pool at this time. Two that I have mentioned in earlier discussions with you are the City's commitment to 2 lease and develop an eighty acre portion of the Hoover property as a City park and the City's need for the construction of a Parks/Public Works facility. In addition, whereas the pool is a high priority for the YMCA because of the enhancements it brings to its membership,a gymnasium and meeting rooms rank higher in priority for the City. Presently there is limited indoor recreational programming space that the City owns. Another concern for the Park Board is whether the extent of benefits derived by the City is an adequate return for such a substantial investment. Should the pool be built in a later phase without City funds, the City may find it is more cost effective to simply rent time from the YMCA on a periodic basis to provide swimming to City residents who are non-YMCA members. Another main issue is that the YMCA timetable to move forward with its plan does not necessarily parallel the City's timetable. We have understood that the YMCA wanted to know of the City's commitment to the proposal by Spring/Summer of 2007. However, the Parks and Recreation Department has just begun the process to update its Master Plan which includes a new community survey,the last survey being completed in 2002. There is the desire on the part of the Park Board to complete these projects prior to committing to a partnership of this magnitude. The survey is scheduled to be completed by September and the Master Plan by early 2008. In conclusion, the main difficulties in the partnership proposal to construct an indoor pool center on financial issues, City priorities, and differing timetables. However, though the City was not to participate in an effort to construct the pool, there still remain potential cooperative projects between our organizations that can be a benefit to the community. Bridge Park and its open space and new lighted ball playing facilities are directly across Kennedy Ave. Also the new Y Branch is within a short walk from a nine acre Grande Reserve neighborhood park site that will include a disc golf facility. The recreational opportunities between our organizations are numerous. Finally, given the conclusion of the Park Board to not recommend a partnership to construct an indoor pool, and based on recent discussions with you, I understand it is your intent to take this issue directly to City Council. We understand your reasoning to do that and would ask that you let me know when you anticipate appearing before the Council, so that I may inform my board. To be as thorough in my explanation as possible concerning the discussion of the Park Board, I am attaching a list of concerns as they were discussed at the meeting. Please contact me if you have further questions or concerns. Thank you. Sincerely, rFr, Ae Mogle Director of Parks and Recreation CC: Park Board 3 YMCAICITY PARTNERSHIP PROPOSAL_FOR CONSTRUCTION OF INDOOR SWIMMINGIRECRBATIONAI_POOL Park Board's Concerns • PB has a larger vision to include more than just an indoor pool. Need for a full service recreation center that can be operated by the City. • PB has discussed possible availability of an existing structure in the City for a recreation facility with existing auditorium and program space when the building is vacated in 2 to 4 years. Concerned that City may need resources for that direction since the timing of their vacating could he close to the completion of YMCA. • City resources, available debt is very limited. A high priority is a parks maintenance/public works building ($5,000,000 plus). • Are nearing the time of a major park development project for that portion of the Hoover property that will be leased to the City.To include athletic and outdoor recreation facilities. • For the City's substantial financial involvement(potentially$2,500,000 or mare)the return would be allowing non-YMCA member City of Yorkville residents to swim and participate in pool programs at the member price vs. non member price. Is that the best use of such a sizable sum (question of cost/benefit ratio)in light of other priorities? • For the amount of use by City would it be more practical to buy time from the YMCA at regular rental rate. • Completing our new community survey by September 2007 may reveal levels of interest different than five years ago. • indoor Swimming Pool is a higher priority to the YMCA than it is to the City Parks and Recreation Department because of the enhancements to its membership. Gym/Indoor programming space operated by the City is a higher priority for City Parks and Recreation, because we are at the mercy of the owners of leased or loaned facilities that we now use. • YMCA is under some deadlines that may not parallel Parks and Recreation timing. Parks and Recreation is on course to complete a new Community Survey by September 2007 and Master Plan and by early 2008. • While we should seek ways to work together in cooperation for the community's benefit, it is a fact that we are competing agencies,with differing priorities and philosophies. 618/07 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Series 2012 for $3,000,000 Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 09/01/2012 - - - - 09/01/2013 90,000.00 5.000% 150,000.00 240,000.00 09/01/2014 95,000.00 5.000% 145,500.00 240,500.00 09/01/2015 100,000.00 5.000% 140,750.00 240,750.00 09/01/2016 105,000.00 5.000% 135 750.00 240,750.00 09/01/2017 110,000.00 5.000% 130,500.00 240,500.00 09/01/2018 115,000.00 5.000% 125,000.00 240,000.00 09/01/2019 120,000.00 5.000% 119,250.00 239,250.00 09/01/2020 125,000.00 5.000% 113,250.00 238,250.00 09/01/2021 135,000.00 5.000% 107,000.00 242,000.00 09/01/2022 140,000.00 5.000% 100,250.00 240,250.00 09/01/2023 145,000.00 5.000% 93,250.00 238,250.00 09/01/2024 155,000.00 5.000% 86,000.00 241,000.00 09/01/2025 165,000.00 5.000% 78,250.00 243,250.00 09/01/2026 170,000.00 5.000% 70,000.00 240,000.00 09/01/2027 180,000.00 5.000% 61,500.00 241,500.00 09/01/2028 190,000.00 5.000% 52,500.00 242,500.00 09/01/2029 200,000.00 5.000% 43,000.00 243,000.00 09/01/2030 210,000.00 5.000% 33;000.00 243,000.00 09/01/2031 220,000.00 5.000% 22,500.00 242,500.00 09/01/2032 230,000.00 5.000% 11,500.00 241,500.00 Total $3,000,000.00 - $1,818,750.00 $4,818,750.00 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $36,375.00 Average Life 12.125 Years Average Coupon 5.0000000%p Net Interest Cost(NIC) 5.0000000% True Interest Cost(TIC) 5.0000000% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 5.0000000% All Inclusive Cost(AIC) 5.0000000% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 5.0000000% Weighted Average Maturity 12.125 Years Series 2012 3M I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7/11/2012 1 1:39 PM Consultants Speer Financial, Inc. Public Finance United City of Yorkville, Kendall County,Illinois Series 2012 for$4,000,000 Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 09/01/2012 - - - - 09/01/2013 120,000.00 5.000% 200,000.00 320,000.00 09/01/2014 125,000.00 5.000% 194,000.00 319,000.00 09/01/2015 135,000.00 5.000% 187,750.00 322,750.00 09/01/2016 140,000.00 5.000% 181,000.00 321,000.00 09/01/2017 145,000.00 5.000% 174,000.00 319,000.00 09/01/2018 155,000.00 5.000% 166,750.00 321,750.00 09/01/2019 160,000.00 5.000% 159,000.00 319,000.00 09/01/2020 170,000.00 5.000% 151,000.00 321,000.00 09/01/2021 180,000.00 5.000% 142,500.00 322,500.00 09/01/2022 190,000.00 5.000% 133,500.00 323,500.00 09/01/2023 195,000.00 5.000% 124,000.00 319,000.00 09/01/2024 205,000.00 5.000% 114,250.00 319,250.00 09/01/2025 220,000.00 5.000% 104,000.00 324,000.00 09/01/2026 230,000.00 5.000% _ 93,000.00 323,000.00 09/01/2027 240,000.00 5.000% 81,500.00 321,500.00 09/01/2028 250,000.00 5.000% 69,500.00 319,500.00 09/01/2029 265,000.00 5.000% 57,000.00 322,000.00 09/01/2030 280,000.00 5.000% 43,750.00 323,750.00 09/01/2031 290,000.00 5.000% 29,750.00 319,750.00 09/01/2032 305,000.00 5.000% 15,250.00 320,250.00 Total $4,000,000.00 - $2,421,500.00 $6,421,500.00 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $48,430.00 Average Life 12.108 Years Average Coupon 5.0000000% Net Interest Cost(NIQ 5.0000000% True Interest Cost(TIC) _ 5.0000000% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes _ 5.0000000% All Inclusive Cost(AIC) _ _5.0000000% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 5.0000000% Weighted Average Maturity 12.108 Years Series 2012 4M I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7/11/2012 1 1:40 PM Speer Financial, Inc. Public Finance Consultants Since 1954 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County,Illinois Series 2012 for $5,000,000 Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 09/01/2012 - - - - 09/01/2013 150,000.00 5.000% 250,000.00 400,000.00 09/01/2014 160,000.00 5.000% 242,500.00 402,500.00 09/01/2015 165,000.00 5.000% 234,500.00 399,500.00 09/01/2016 175,000.00 5.000% 226,250.00 401,250.00 09/01/2017 185,000.00 5.000% 217,500.00 402,500.00 09/01/2018 195,000.00 5.000% 208,250.00 403,250.00 09/01/2019 200,000.00 5.000% 198,500.00 398,500.00 09/01/2020 215,000.00 5.000% 188,500.00 403,500.00 09/01/2021 225,000.00 5.000% 177,750.00 402,750.00 09/01/2022 235,000.00 5.000% 166,500.00 401,500.00 09/01/2023 245,000.00 5.000% 154,750.00 399,750.00 09/01/2024 260,000.00 5.000% 142,500.00 402,500.00 09/01/2025 270,000.00 5.000% 129,500.00 399,500.00 09/01/2026 285,000.00 5.000% 116,000.00 401,000.00 09/01/2027 300,000.00 5.000% 101,750.00 401,750.00 09/01/2028 315,000.00 5.000% 86,750.00 401,750.00 09/01/2029 330,000.00 5.000% 71,000.00 401,000.00 09/01/2030 345,000.00 5.000% 54,500.00 399,500.00 09/01/2031 365,000.00 5.000% 37,250.00 402,250.00 09/01/2032 380,000.00 5.000% 19,000.00 399,000.00 Total $5,000,000.00 - $3,023,250.00 $8,023,250.00 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $60,465.00 Average Life 12.093 Years Average Coupon 5.0000000% Net Interest Cost(NIC) 5.0000000% True Interest Cost(TIC) 5.0000000% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 5.0000000% All Inclusive Cost(AIC) _ 5.0000000% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 5.0000000%_ Weighted Average Maturity 12.093 Years Series 2012 5M I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7/11/2012 1 1:41 PM Speer Financial, Inc. Public Finance Consultants Since 1954 United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois Series 2012 for$6,000,000 Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 09/01/2012 - - - - 09/01/2013 180,000.00 5.000% 300,000.00 480,000.00 09/01/2014 190,000.00 5.000% 291,000.00 481,000.00 09/01/2015 200,000.00 5.000% 281,500.00 481,500.00 09/01/2016 210,000.00 5.000% 271,500.00 481,500.00 09/01/2017 220,000.00 5.000% 261,000.00 481,000.00 09/01/2018 230,000.00 5.000% 250,000.00 480,000.00 09/01/2019 245,000.00 5.000% 238,500.00 483,500.00 09/01/2020 255,000.00 5.000% 226,250.00 481,250.00 09/01/2021 270,000.00 5.000% 213,500.00 483,500.00 09/01/2022 280,000.00 5.000% 200,000.00 480,000.00 09/01/2023 295,000.00 5.000% 186,000.00 481,000.00 09/01/2024 310;000.00 5.000% 171,250.00 481,250.00 09/01/2025 325,000.00 5.000% 155,750.00 480,750.00 09/01/2026 345 000.00 5.000% 139,500.00 484,500.00 09/01/2027 360,000.00 5.000% 122,250.00 482,250.00 09/01/2028 380,000.00 5.000% 104,250.00 484,250.00 09/01/2029 395,000.00 5.000% 85,250.00 480,250.00 09/01/2030 415,000.00 5.000% 65,500.00 480,500.00 09/01/2031 435,000.00 5.000% 44,750.00 479,750.00 09/01/2032 460,000.00 5.000% 23,000.00 483,000.00 Total $6,000,000.00 - $3,630,750.00 $9,630,750.00 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $72,615.00 _Average Life 12.103 Years Average Coupon 5.0000000% Net Interest Cost(NIC) 5.0000000% True Interest Cost(TIC) 5.0000000% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 5.0000000% All Inclusive Cost(AIC) 5.0000000% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 5.0000000% Weighted Average Maturity 12.103 Years Series 2012 6M I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 7111/2012 1 1:42 PM Speer Financial, Inc. Public Finance Consultants Since 1954 n cm CC > S � oa N nm o ti o A O O n v D o m C m C Q 70 mO A D Et, • NnoAO > 4INzMo 9 p " � � r � n n oz ozn0 +`. rn Oo > Opacm O - xo zO � O .f a n n $ -o5 D i mOmmz �_ Z mm I!! O AG) m0 y Nti O o � � (C� mnnm O N T N A '_1 y y D Z n D ~ Z � m z ° mAN uul z ,z„ m Oz 5 �0 ^ o � nz � � no 0 Dn � nD Z3 � vi I"rl O C . ti m C Z A qA ? N ° Zzzm • rn all If Id QI i Ill L , e rn • - . z A s' m m L s m N r '� • O _ O G) O O IA 2 s T ■ D � VIEWING JF� 0 S I, o _ r ; . o A aUq _ D rr a 8 � i — c►ry0 Memorandum esr. 1ss6 To: City Council From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation t X11 (4 CC: Tim Evans, Superintendent of Recreation �� C—r� , �4 Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks MMAC—1 <LE r° Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: July 19, 2012 Subject: Recreation Analysis Backl4round On Monday, July 9th, the Adhoc Committee's recommendation to City Council was to place a referenda question on the November ballot regarding a$3-5 million dollar bond to construct a facility to partner with the YMCA. On Tuesday, July 10th, the Committee of the Whole, under the Home Rule Referendum discussion, received a report on the Adhoc Committee meeting, and it was also suggested to place a referenda question on the ballot on whether or not the City should purchase the REC Center. On Thursday, July 12th, the Park Board discussed the previous two meetings of the week and provided the recommendations below, knowing that they would not have a second meeting prior to the City Council meeting tonight. Tonight's Public Hearing is the second of three on the potential purchase of the REC Center. As stated by Mayor Golinski, a$2.5 million dollar purchase price has been negotiated at a 6% interest rate over a 20 year period. A vote on the purchase of the facility is scheduled to take place in September. The current lease agreement ends on June 30, 2013. At this time, no lease extension has been negotiated and until a purchase agreement is signed, it is assumed that the recreation department and all programs will be moving out of the REC Center. Due to the inclusion of the referenda questions on the agenda that directly affect the Parks and Recreation Department and its future, staff has prepared additional information on the net cost of the current recreation operation at its current facility for Council's evaluation. Value of Recreation The discussion of the actual value of recreation can be broken into two parts: 1)the value to the residents for their quality of life and 2) the net cost to provide all of the services that are provided by the Recreation Department. Staff believes that an open discussion about the impact of the loss of the REC Center and the effect on the budget and the current programming levels must be brought to the City Council as question on referenda and the REC Center are discussed at this meeting. Value of Recreation The value of recreation to residents is their quality of life. Recreation stimulates economy and provides personal benefits of health-related needs (both physical and emotional). Parks and Recreation staff are incredibly adaptive and innovative in finding ways to evolve and create programming for the variety of users they serve. Parks and Recreation serves children with a Spanish lesson or gardening class, adults through softball leagues,provides a workout in a Zumba class, or Seniors through a walking club. As the Illinois Park and Recreation Association motto states, "Parks &Recreation, the Benefits are Endless!" As recreation programming has expanded over the years, it has been driven by the fight against childhood obesity and increased demand for personal fitness and wellbeing. Interestingly enough, there is a new group to serve through Parks and Recreation programming. In 2011 the first of 78.2 million Baby Boomers turned 65. As the numbers nearing retirement continue to grow, communities will be trying to meet the Boomers vibrant lifestyles. Leisure will no longer mean our current senior center sand leisure programs, but instead mean active programming and a focus on health and fitness. Economically, the Boomers are becoming more powerful not just because of their population size but because of their disposable income. For example, between 1988 and 1991 senior wealth grew by 20%while median wealth for the country as a whole grew by about 2%. In 1986 the average seventy year old had 71% of the buying power of a 30 year old. By 1996, 10 years later, the seventy year old has acquired 18% more to spend than the 30 year old(Morris, 1996). Quite simply, the Boomers have more money to spend on leisure programming. And they do. (California Park&Recreation Society, 2002) Please see the attached links to reference additional articles and information on the benefits of recreation and leisure. Copies of these articles are attached. http://www.dm og v org/Departments/Parks/PDF/Save%20Your%2OPark%2OReference%20Mate rial.pdf http://www.recmanagement.com/200802feO3.php http://www.livestrong.com/article/43 8983-what-are-the-health-benefits-of-leisure-recreation/ http://atfiles.org/files/pdf/Economic-Benefits-Active.pd iles/pdf/Economic-Benefits-Active.pdf http://seniorj oumal.com/NEW S/Features/2007/7-04-13-ActiveRecreation.htm http://exercise.about.com/od/healthinjuries/tp/Fitness-Trends-For-2011.htm http://www.bls. og v/spotlijzht/2008/sports/pdf/sports_bls�spotlight.pdf http://www.heart.or /g idc/groups/heart- public/kwcm/ksop/ksmd/documents/downloadable/ucm 319588.pdf Parks and Recreation is a vital part of a local economy in creating a place that people want to raise their families and retire in,while also having a positive impact on the economic value of a home. The Parks and Recreation Department makes Yorkville a better place to live, work and recreate. It is our job to plan for the future, for the community, and meet the recreational needs of the participants. At last year's IPRA conference, this video was shown. http://www.youtube.com/user/IPRAssoc1815 This is why we do our jobs—it's the pride we have in making people happy through the services we provide. Cost of Recreation The Yorkville Parks &Recreation Department provides an amazing number of programs, events, and opportunities on a very limited budget. Much of this comes from the talents of the dedicated and driven staff that are in their current positions. The other key factor in this equation is the ability to have a "home"base for the Recreation Department that is a 38,000 SF facility with studios, gyms, a pool, locker rooms,preschool, kid care, and a fitness center including a track and weight room. Last year the Parks and Recreation Department budget did not spend $49,630 of the transferred funds because of the increase in program revenue, directly associated with all recreation operations coming out of the REC Center and the current management staff. Since FY2000, the total subsidy to Recreation has been as follows: FY2000 $80,901 FY 2001 $125,456 FY2002 $130,269 FY 2003 $221,439 FY 2004 $226,211 FY2005 $297,267 FY2006 $238,977 FY2007 $455,552 FY2008 $530,222 FY2009 $504,619 FY2010 $359,295 FY2011 $244,765 FY2012 $139,158 FY2013 $229,400 General Fund total subsidy to Recreation $500,000 $500,000 $400,000 0 ;j $300,000 - d $200,000 $100,000 $0 & o� o o"5 0* o`) ©`O o� a`I Per the excel document attached, the net cost to the City in FY 12 was $139,158 to run the Recreation Department. To simplify: the City transferred $736,710 to operate Parks & Recreation. Of that money, $49,630 was not spent, the Recreation Department spent $139,158 to operate, and the remaining funds were spent by the Parks Department. Estimating the subsidy to Recreation if we leave the REC Center concludes the following results: FY2014 $1,052,577 FY2015 $468,385 FY2016 $444,254 FY2017 $451,741 General Fund subsidy to Recreation losing the REC Center $1,200,000 $1,000,000 - $800,000 Y VI Q Y $600,000 ZE $400,000 $z0o,aoo $0 ° 0 o o 01 n 10 °yL o 0 °yti o �ti o �ti o �ti o ��o N y ,Z( '� �y'0IZ( ' -Alp 4y'oI ® �Az l k "Z 4Ao The Recreation Department is the most inexpensive department to operate since it can collect funds to help offset the cost of running the department. Compared to other City departments, the Recreation Department covers 76% of its operating budget through its own revenue. FYI net cost subsidy to each Department Recreation $139,158 (76%revenue collected-programming) Parks $547,922 Community Development $294,426 (63%revenue collected-permits) Police $3,665,577 (4.5%revenue collected - fines) Finance $340,535 Administration $782,327 Public Works (Streets Dept.) $720,452 Refuse $1,200,000 To date there has been no detailed discussion on the dissemination of programs to other locations or dissolution of the Recreation Department. It is understood, however, that if the REC Center is not purchased, then an immediate consequence is that the Recreation Department will be dispersed in at minimum 3 buildings, as well as schools. At this time,both facilities/departments (YMCA and REC Center/Recreation) currently operate at buildings less than 3 miles away from each other,providing a variety of services, choices of classes, and healthy competition in close proximity. Yorkville (measuring north to south on Route 47) is approximately 7.2 miles long and is 22 square miles in area. As the area continues to develop, this large area will likely need an additional facility(or two) to meet the needs of its residents. For example, the Naperville Park District just entered into a lease agreement to run programs in a building just down the street from the Fry Family YMCA. Both organizations can co-exist and provide a greater variety of programs and activities for their residents. The FY12 net cost to operate the Recreation Department was $139,158. Moving out of the REC Center will have a direct impact on the General Fund due to the decrease in programming as well as a decrease in collected revenue. In addition, residents will not receive the same level of service. In the interim, as the Recreation Department continues to run programs at our current programming level, and until a new facility is built and begins to operate, the impact to the General Fund budget of leaving the REC Center and continuing the Recreation Department is attached. General Fund Transfer to Parks & Rec (79) $2,000,000 $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 General Fund Transfer Keeping $800 000 REC Center $600,000 (General Fund Transfer Losing $400,000 REC Center $200,000 - — $0 - The General Fund transfer to continue to operate recreation at our current levels without the REC Center is estimated at a total net cost of$1,264,020 over the next four years (FY14- FYI 7). In addition to the increased transfer due to the expenses of leaving the REC Center, program revenue will likely decreases, so the $1,264,020 does not include the decrease in 'We've seen a large increase in program registrations in the 79 budget,which we attribute to having a just by having a captive audience at the REC Center. revenue, meaning that the transfer from the General Fund will be larger than the number provided. As shown on the attached spreadsheet, the four-year cumulative transfer from the General Fund if we left the REC Center for FY14 is estimated at $1,758,352, an increase of $774,380 from the current budgeted number. There are a few additional factors that are not currently included in the previous number. Budgetary principles would require us to close out the REC Center deficit via a General Fund or Parks & Recreation transfer. Summary. Recreation services have proven to be valued by society and the Yorkville community. The City's Recreation Department is able to provide a high level of service with a low subsidy from the General Fund. It is most cost-effective to remain in our current location at the REC Center. The department has already proven that it can grow and expand their offerings to the community and increase revenue by operating out of this facility. Without the purchase of the REC Center, the Yorkville Recreation Department would have no option but to decrease program offerings due to limited space or spend more money for the same amount of services. The net effect of losing the building is a decrease in revenue, increase in costs, and a probable reduction in the level of service for Yorkville residents. t � SAVE YOUR PARK 4w % DEPARTMENT —T ,W �a National Recreation and ParkAssociation SAVE YOUR PARK&RECREATION DEPARTMENT SECTION 01 ECONOMIC IMPACT.. ... .... . ..... ....... ..... ................ .... . ... ..... PAGE 02 SECTION 02 HEALTH & PHYSICAL ACTIVITY .... ...... ...... ......... . ... ..... ... .... PAGE 04 SECTION 03 CRIME & AT-RISK YOUTH .... .......... ..... .......... ....... . .. ........ . ... PAGE 06 SECTION 04 TRANSPORTATION ...... . .. ..... ........ ..... ....... ......... .. . .. ... .... ..... PAGE 08 SECTION 05 DISPARITIES IN PARKS & RECREATION .. . . ........... . ... ... ... ...... PAGE 10 A e r SAFE YOUR PARK RECREATION DEPARTMENT- - - -6.1 ECOtiOMI IMPACT SAVE YOUR M r'.' ECONOMIC A National Recreation and Park Association 12010 Measuring the Economic Impact of Park and Recreation Services. John Crompton Abstract: Park and recreation departments are generally perceived as high cost public services in many annual city bud- gets because their operational costs outweigh revenue. Economic impact studies usually focus on determining the return of investment that residents receive because park and recreation services do indeed serve citizens.This publication pro- vides a guide for professionals to measure the return on investments that residents make to park and recreation depart- ments. Due to the simplistic methodology of these studies, external consultants are not needed to do the research. Park and recreation department personnel can conduct these studies in-house in order to cut costs.The publication includes a questionnaire to assist in data callection,a formula to calculate the economic impact of visitor spending and examples of how to present the data effectively to audiences. Moreover, the report reveals the results of more than 100 economic analyses conducted over the last 10 years at sports tournaments,special events, recreation facilities, and park facilities. http://www.nrpa.org/research-papers Active Living Research 12010 The Economic Benefits of Open Space, Recreation Facilities and Walkable Community Design. Research Synthesis Abstract: Over the last four decades, obesity rates have increased dramatically while physical activity rates have de- creased.This has raised concerns over community design and the availability of open spaces to encourage physical activity. In addition to health benefits,walkable neighborhoods, parks and open spaces also yield economic benefits. This research synthesis reveals the economic value of outdoor recreation, open spaces and walkable communities.The following are some of the key findings:park and recreation areas have a positive effect on residential property values; the level of economic impact on real estate depends on the proximity of the homes to the park and recreation area;open spaces in urban areas generates greater economic benefits to surrounding properties than in rural areas;open space and recreation areas can provide fiscal benefits to municipal governments and open spaces and recreation areas in- crease the marketability of residential property around the area. http://www.activeLiving research.org/files/Synthesis_Shoup-Ewing_March20l O.pdf The Trust for Public Land 12009 Measuring the Economic Value of a City Park System. Harnik, P. & Welle, B. Abstract:The Trust for Public Land's Center for City Park Excellence has measured seven factors that make city park systems valuable.While not all aspects of parks systems can be quantified,this report takes a closer took at the follow- ing factors that can indeed be quantified:property value,tourism, direct use, health, community cohesion, clean water and clean air. For each of the factors mentioned above,the report provides a description of the methodological steps to determine the value of factor. Furthermore,the report provides detailed calculations of the economic value of each fac- tor using specific examples from various cities in the United States.Studies have found that city park systems yield the following economic benefits: direct income, collective wealth, direct savings and environmental savings. http://ctoud.tpl.org/pubs/ccpe-econvalueparks-rpt.pdf Save Your Park&Recreation Department 02 i r .ert 3 r y ^, a pw NNW 1� 02 HEALTH & PHYSICAL ACTIVITY SAVE YOUR PARK & RECRtATION DEPARTMENT HEALTH & PHYSICAL ACTIVITY University of California, School of Public Health 12011 Park and Recreation Programs Help to Reduce Childhood Obesity. Policy Brief Abstract: Childhood obesity rates have been steadily increasing in the United States. Over 12 million children are overweight.This is partly due to sedentary behavior attributed to increased screen time.The built environment has also proven to have an influence on children's physical activity.A 10 year longitudinal study conducted of 3000 children living in 12 communities in Southern California found that those children who lived close to parks and recreation facilities have a lower Body Mass Index at the age of 18 than their counterparts who did not live close to parks and recreation facilities. The key findings from the study reveal that parks and recreational facilities reduce the risk of obesity among children and more than half of the children in the study had no structured recreational programing within 550 yard of their resi- dence.The research findings have important implications for future policy decisions with respect to proximity to parks and recreation. http://www.activelivingresearch.org/files/PolicyB rief_ParkProximity.pdf The Trust for Public Land 12006 The Health Benefits of Parks: How Parks Help Keep Americans and Their Communi- ties Fit and Healthy. Gies, E. Abstract: Parks, playgrounds,trails and open space provide several health benefits for citizens. Some of the health benefits include improving strength, endurance and mental watt-being. Research has found that only 25%of Americans engage in the recommended levels of physical activity.Sedentary lifestyles are contributing to increasing obesity rates and one of the solutions that the Centers for disease Control and Prevention has proposed is to increase the number of parks and playgrounds.This report provides data on three avenues through which the park and recreation sector influ- ences healthy lifestyles.The first section discusses evidence to show that parks support physical activity and provide other amenities such as community gardens that contribute to achieving good health.The second section discusses how trails and greenways enhance health in new communities and the last section focusses an the psychological and social health benefits that parks and greenways provide. http://www.tpt.org/publicatio ns/books-reports/park-benefits/the-health-benefits-of-parks.html Active Living Research 12010 Parks, Playground and Active Living. Robert Wood .Johnson Foundation. Abstract: Physical activity has several health benefits for both adults and children. Parks and playgrounds provide ample opportunity for people to engage in physical activity. Research suggests that parks and playgrounds do indeed influence physical activity. Research has also proven that America's parks can be leveraged to promote physical activity for diverse groups.This synthesis presents evidence on various factors of parks and recreation that facilitate physical activity. Some of the factors that influence exercise include proximity to parks, park acreage, certain types of facilities such as trails and playgrounds, park aesthetics,structured recreation programming and park renovations. In addition,the synthesis also discusses the areas of research which can be improved upon to further substantiate the evidence that parks play a key role in encouraging physical activity in our communities. http://www.activeLivingresearch.org/files/Synthesis_Mowen_Feb2010.pdf Save Your Park&Recreation Department 04 s y. f k i f 1 ;W - Y 1w 03 IF ISK YO �UT air_— r 7 a y �ATIQ N # oil - National Recreation and Park Association 12010 Witt, P. & Caldwell, L. Abstract:There is a perception that youth only create problems that need to be solved.On the contrary,youth are valuable resources to be invested in;however,they need to be provided with opportunities and guidance to assist them in their development.The purpose of this research synthesis is to provide park and recreation professionals and elected officials with data to better understand how park and recreation can be further Leveraged to foster youth development.This publication emphasizes the role that parks and recreation can play in influencing youth developmental outcomes.Park and recreation departments are appropriately positioned to promote positive youth development through providing organized,structured programming that is supervised by adults. Participation in youth programs offered by park and recreation agencies has the potential to yield positive outcomes for youth in several developmental areas such as autonomy,identity development,social relatlonships,conflict resolution skills,academic success,mental health and civic engagement. http://www.nrpa.arg/research-papers Canada Games Council, the Ontario Track and Field Association and Brockville Sports [ 2008 Carmichael, D. Abstract:Youth crime gets a lot of media attention.Youth crimes have been increasing in both the United States and Canada.High youth crime rates are attributed to an increase in street gangs.Important to note that not only are street gangs are prevalent in urban areas but in rural and non-metropolitan areas as wet[.There is very limited evidence to illustrate that punitive methods such as incarceration,boot camps,etc.are effective in reducing youth crime.Several criminologists have reported that the most effective way to prevent youth crime is to guide youth away from negative social activities prior to them becoming involved in criminal activities.In fact,social development programs such as organized sport reduce the risk of youth crime through helping youth developing problem solving skills,positive peer interactions,etc.Since the root of youth crime is complex,organized sport itself does not reduce youth crime;however,research has shown that it does indeed contribute to preventing crime via positive social development.This creates a need to develop non-traditional partnerships between community sports networks,law enforcement,social service agencies,etc.in order to effectively reduce youth crime. http://www.fairplayforchildren.org/pdf/l 299566926.pdf Allen, L. & Barcelona, R. [edsj. 12011 Volume 130 Abstract:This publication is organized into 9 articles that focus on various dimensions of the relationship between adolescent devel- opment,leisure and recreation.The first article discusses under what conditions recreation and play contribute to youth development. The second artic[e is a literature review on family Leisure and its impact on youth development.The third article discusses four stages of integrating Leisure and educational outcomes.The fourth article discusses how recreation is positioned in a community youth de- velopment framework and presents three case studies on this topic.The fifth article presents evidence that camp participation yields positive youth development outcomes.The sixth article presents arguments for a new outdoor-based play movement.The seventh article discusses the association between adventure-based programming and positive youth development.The eighth article presents the competencies of recreation and youth development staff and discusses how to integrate these into education and training.The ninth article discusses the importance of including recreation as a public policy priority due to the potential role that recreation can play in addressing social and academic issues. http://books.google.com/backs?hL=en&lr=&id=[VBrigDMzagC&oi=fnd&pg=PPS&dq=parks+and+recreation+and+youth+crime&ots=kB4 fLY3rfy&sfg=B M LQXSEe n BAsPa aXOOd6 p MfzS l c#v=o n epage&q&f=false Save Your Park&Recreation Department 06 ✓ate 4 #. ; J10. k A .� lip Xy TRANSPOR ON • a �_ A SAVE YOUR PARK & RECREATION . TRANSPORTATION Rails to Trails Conservancy 12008 Active Transportation for America: The Case for Increased Federal Investment in Bicycling and Walking. Abstract: Current circumstances surrounding increased congestion, gas prices and obesity rates have made it neces- sary to discuss investments in a more diverse transportation system that provides increased opportunities to use walk, bike and use public transportation.The use of active transportation has several advantages.This report quantifies the benefits that active transportation yields via climate change, less dependence on oil and obesity prevention. It is argued that return on investment from active transportation is so significant that Americans must strive to walk and bike more. The analysis of the data used in this report reveals that modest increases in walking and biking could potential result in a reduction of approximately 70 billion miles in automobile travel per year. Furthermore, substantial increases in walking and biking could lead to avoiding 200 billion miles of automobile travel per year. http://www.raitstotrails.org/resources/documents/whatwedo/atfa/ATFA_20081020.pdf Political Economy Research Institute 12011 Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure: A National Study of Employment Impacts. Garrett-Peltier, H. Abstract:Active transportation infrastructure can be used for multiple purposes. Recreation, transport and fitness are some of the ways in which people use active transport infrastructure. Not only does active transport infrastructure yield transportation and health benefits but it also generates economic benefits.Some of the economic benefits of active transportation infrastructure include increased revenues and jobs for local businesses.The purpose of this study is to understand the employment impacts of bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure,This study examined 58 transportation projects and the number of jobs created through each type of project in 11 cities in the United States.The study uses an input-output model to determine the direct,indirect and induced employment that is created by the various projects.The data analysis revealed that overall,for every$1 million spent,cycling projects create 11.4 jobs in the state in which the project is executed. Pedestrian only projects create 10 jobs per$1 million. Road only projects create the least number of jobs at an average of 7.B jobs per$1 million. http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadm i n/pdf/pubiished_study/P FR I_AB ikes_June2Ol 1.pdf Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 12011 The Power of Trails for Promoting Physical Activity in Communities. Active Living Research Abstract: One of the national health objectives is to promote physical activity for adults and children to lower the rate of obesity and chronic diseases in the United States.The built environment(streets, parks,traits,etc.) plays an important role in encouraging physical activity. Rails to Trails Conservancy has reported that there are approximately 19,000 miles of rail trails in the United States with approximately 1,100 trail projects that are currently in the development process. This research synthesis highlights the findings on the influence that trails have on physical activity.The research reveals that proximity, trail conditions (surface conditionsl,trail amenities and trait side facilities are factors that are associated with trail use.White the use of trails is a cost effective method to promote physical activity,the evidence of the effect of trail usage on physical activity is mixed. http://www.activelivingresearch.org/files/ALR—Brief_PowerofTrai ts.pdf Save Your Park&Recreation Department 08 Y id oc �� r law DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING PARKS & RECREATION SAVE YOUR DISPARITIES IN ACCESSING PARKS Policy Brief drafted for Active Living Research 12011 Disparities in Park Space by Race and Income. University of California Berkeley Abstract: Parks are an appropriate resource for people to engage in active living. Parks are also a valuable resource in the battle against rising obesity rates.There are numerous studies suggesting that park proximity has an influence on physical activity. For those that live closer to parks, integrating physical activity into their daily lives is relatively easier than for those who live further away from parks.A study conducted in Los Angetes illustrates that there exists significant disparities in accessing parks.This policy brief outlines the results from the study which reveals that unequal access to parks and recreation impacts low income communities and racial/ethnic communities in the Los Angeles area. Latinos and African American are more likely to Live in areas that have a Limited number of parks. Research has also revealed that parks in low income communities are not well maintained and have fewer services and facilities.The policy brief ends with recommendations to improve access to parks based on the research findings. http://www.activeliving research.org/files/PoLicy8 rief_ParkDisparities.pd f Active Living Research 12011 Do All Children Have Places to Be Active? Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Abstract:One of most significant health problems the United states is childhood obesity. Obesity rates in children have almost quadrupled in the in the Last 40 years. Physical activity provides several valuable benefits for children.This re- search synthesis presents data on how the built environment, parks and playgrounds in particular, can provide resourc- es for chitdren to engage in physical activity.The main research findings illustrate that racial/ethnic and children from lower income communities are more likely to be obese and overweight. Communities that are characterized by racial) ethnic and Low income populations are less likely to have features that support active transportation and have limited ac- cess to parks that are well maintained and safe. Furthermore, racial/ethnic and low income populations are more likely to reside in communities that have high crime rates. Public perception of a neighborhood is unsafe is associated with lower levels of physical activity.The synthesis concludes with areas in which additional research could be conducted to further understand the association between the built environment, physical activity and access. http://www.activelivingresearch,org/files/Synthesis_Taytor-Lou_Disparities_Nov2011.pdf The City Project 12011 Healthy Parks, Schools and Communities: Green Access and Equity for Orange County. Garcia, R. Abstract: Parks and green space provide numerous benefits that improve the overall quality of our lives, however, not all residents in Orange County, CA are able to easily access parks and green space in order to reap these benefits.This publication discusses the importance of equal access to parks and green space for all citizens as a vehicle to improve physical health, psychological health, community pride,economic vitality and environmental conservation. Research conducted by The City Project reveals that Orange County has 41 acres of green space per 1000 of the population.The communities with the least access to parks reside in north Orange County.These communities are occupied by low income populations and have a high concentration of people of color. The report also presents recommendations on achieving equitable development so that all residents are able to benefit from parks and green space. http:/Iwww,cityprojectca.org/btog/wp-content/uploads/tot 1/03/CityProject_OCrepart_ENGLISH1.pdf Save Your Park&Recreation Department 10 FQF awass iD additional park and tecfaction dot❑and ruseareb.becOM-9 On NPPA ML-MOer fodCly! www. nrpa.org/membership National Recreation and Purk Association 22377 Selmoni Ridge Pood LNational Recreation Ashburn,VA 20148-t5DI qw and Park Association 703-858-0784 LOCAL 800-.626.NRPA (6772) wwwwPo.org A Booming Market -- Recreation and Fitness for Baby Boomers Page 1 of 5 L E RFTI RMAC NACEMENT TnE�lA&uiw mTH IDEAS & SOLUTIONS FOR �`Ec�ii�Tr1+�N, SPORTS & FfmEss FAcumEs 11 mur.ERs A Booming Market Recreation and Fitness for Baby Boomers By Stacy St. Clair Decades ago, fitness programming was not unlike a sit-down meal at a wedding reception. There was a set menu that did not take into account the tastes, lifestyle or health restrictions of specific guests. In recent years, however, the industry has become a virtual buffet, with items intended for a variety of tastes and appetites. There are options now to tempt children, teens, seniors and women. And now there's a new group to satisfy. As baby boomers hit retirement age, recreation managers must examine how they serve America's largest population group. They must look at whether their programs appeal to this group's physical, mental and financial interests. "Baby boomers started the fitness craze," said Anne Rothschadl, a professor in Springfield College's (Mass.) department of sport management and recreation. "They're not going to go into aging the way other generations have. They will not stand for being treated like the others." It can be tempting to go with a one-size-fits-all approach to recreation programming, but it wouldn't do much for your overall financial health. Baby boomers represent a crucial segment of the population—a segment that has the money and the desire to reach optimum fitness levels. The U.S. Census Bureau defines baby boomers as the generation born between 1946 and 1964. In 2006, the oldest of the boomers turned 60. Among the Americans who have already celebrated that milestone are President George W. Bush, Cher, Donald Trump and Sylvester Stailone. Not exactly your grandmother's sexagenarians, are they? That's exactly the point. As the boomers age, they'll be healthier, more active and trendier than previous generations. Most also understand the importance of fitness, meaning facility managers won't have to convince them that working out is important because this population already embraces those principles. Instead, they simply need to be given classes and programs that address their specific health concerns and personal interests. It may sound like a daunting task, but it truly isn't. Facilities willing to tweak their programs and educate themselves on this generation's needs will have few problems catering to this large segment of the population. Give them what they want "The consumer has a choice today," said Colin Milner, chief executive officer of the International Council on Active Aging. "If you don't address their needs, they're going to go elsewhere. Not addressing their needs is the equivalent of committing professional suicide." Five years ago, the Groton Senior Center in Groton, Conn., recognized the opportunity and addressed it. The planning staff organized a roundtable during which they invited residents between ages 45 and 55 to participate in a group discussion. During the conversation, participants were asked about aging,what they see themselves doing as they age and how they are going to approach their 60s, 70s and 80s. The participants' answers did not surprise Mary Jo Riley, the center's supervisor, who is a baby boomer herself. Respondents said they had visions of themselves in retirement or second careers, but they did not know the services or programs they would need to stay active as they hit their 80s. http:l/www.recmanagement.com/feature_print.php?fid=200802feO3 7/19/2012 A Booming Market -- Recreation and Fitness for Baby Boomers Page 2 of 5 "Much of the trend was to stay fit and healthy," Riley said. "There was also interest in travel and technology." Having such a conversation was important in Groton, where the senior population has doubled in the past two decades. Nearly 20 percent of the community is older than 55, with many of them military retirees. The 28-year-old center, which is preparing to build a 15,000-square-foot addition, is accredited by the National Institute of Senior Centers because of its approach to meeting the demands of today's aging population. The center also has designed fitness programs to appeal to as many people as possible. There are low- level Arthritis Foundation classes all the way up to intermediate-level aerobics. They also offer day trips— mostly visits to good restaurants for dinner and evening entertainment—that require plenty of walking and physical activity. Boomers also tend to be more time-conscious than their older counterparts. They have places to go and people to see, so their fitness routines must be quick and convenient. To cater to their on-the-go lifestyle, the Groton Senior Center began offering designer coffee and a continental breakfast so folks can take the time for a quick bite and a chat with friends after class. In almost every facet of programming, the facility focuses on the boomers'time constraints. They offer one-on-one classes so they can fit the boomers' schedules. They also open the fitness center at 7:30 a.m. and schedule evening programs three to four times a week so patrons can find the hours that work best for them, Get the word out "I think the most important piece of advice is, 'Try it.'Whatever program you think may attract participation, try it," Riley suggested. "If it doesn't work, modify it and try it again. We have found that offering a program we think boomers would like takes about three times to get it right. If it doesn't happen after three times, we drop it and move on." Recreation programs often rely on word-of-mouth to do most of their advertising, Riley said. If managers drop a class because it only attracted a small turnout the first time, they haven't given it enough of a chance. And it is important to get the word out. Most boomers and seniors don't realize programs are available until they hear about them. "Getting them in the door for one event makes them realize that it is not a nursing-home atmosphere, but an active recreation center that also offers services," Riley said. "Trips, the fitness room and computer classes are the big draw for boomers and men. Offering classes at times they will take them is the other draw—especially if you offer evening programs." To market programs effectively, it's important to pay attention to small details such as naming a program. Boomers, for example, don't consider themselves old or feeble, so it's a big mistake to use words that remind them of their age. "Something like 'golden oldies' really misses the boat in the marketplace," Milner said. Boomers are more active than previous generations and care deeply about having enough time and energy to handle everything on their plates. The founders of"Curves,"for example, recognized these concerns when they created a circuit workout that women could complete in 30 minutes. "Try using terms Iike 'energy booster' in your fitness classes," Milner suggested. "That's going to attract boomers." Who Are the Baby Boomers? Still unconvinced your facility should be catering to the needs of baby boomers? Then maybe you don't realize who belongs to this active generation. This group frolicked at Woodstock. They saw a http://www.recmanagement.com/feature_print.php?fid=200802feO3 7/19/2012 A Booming Market -- Recreation and Fitness for Baby Boomers Page 3 of 5 man land on the moon and Kennedy assassinated. They introduced phrases such as "green is good" into the American lexicon, and they are the CEOs of today's biggest corporations. Their most famous members include Bono, Michael Jordan, Steve Jobs, Madonna, Tom Cruise and Jerry Seinfeld. "They don't think of themselves as old, and neither do we," said industry expert Judith Leblein- Josephs. The numbers don't lie. This generation is large and knowledgeable, and is a possible revenue generator for thousands of recreation centers nationwide. Here, by the numbers, is a closer look at the boomers'world: 78.2 million: estimated number of boomers 7,918: number of people turning 60 each day 330: number of people turning 60 each hour 50.8 percent: percentage of boomers who are female 9.1 million: estimated number of boomers who are black 8 million: estimated number of boomers who are Hispanic 32 percent: proportion of Alaska's population that was part of the baby boomer generation, as of the last census. Boomers also comprise more than 30 percent of the population in New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine. In contrast, Utah was the only state where boomers constituted less than 25 percent. 57.8 million: number of baby boomers living in 2030, according to projections. An estimated 54.9 percent would be female. That year, boomers would be between 66 and 84 years old. Give them what they need While paying attention to what boomers want is critical, it's also important to remember what they need. Balance and weight programs are critical components of any wellness program. Complications from falling due to weak muscles and uncertain balance kill thousands of older adults every year. One in three people over 55 falls each year. Roughly half of those people will fall again. "It's very important that this generation have access to balance programs," Milner said. "Fear of falling leads to more than just physical problems. It also reduces socialization and leads to isolation." Weight programs also are critical for boomers as they age. Studies show that 29 percent of people over 65 can't lift 10 pounds. In addition, 50 percent of menopausal women over 50 have the initial stages of osteopenia (a bone mineral density that is lower than normal peaks), and they don't even know it. Recreation facility managers would be wise to offer weight-bearing exercise programs specifically catered to boomers. The first step is to establish a need, Milner said. Work with a screening organization to provide bone mineral density screenings and consultations. Until these potential members have been screened, they are likely unaware of the issues they may face and the steps needed to address them. "By taking these initial steps toward addressing bone health, your facility will become a key long-term partner for your members and potential members," Milner said. Beyond the fitness center Workout rooms and exercise studios aren't the only places where boomers are underserved. Aquatic centers and waterparks also could be doing more to pique their interest. The aquatic industry should be responding to the boomer generation much as it catered to young people's tastes more than a decade ago. With the younger generation entertained, it's now time to http:ll www.recmanagement.com/feature_print.php?fid=200802feO3 7/19/2012 A Booming Market-- Recreation and Fitness for Baby Boomers Page 4 of 5 consider the aging population because, try as you might, water cannons and drop slides aren't likely to attract anyone who witnessed the moon landing. Experts recommend including amenities and services that the boomers introduced to American culture. That means offering self-indulgent features like private cabanas, poolside wait staff and spa options. In addition to staying healthy, this generation understands the importance of pampering themselves. And they're willing to spend the money to do so. "Each generation is different," industry expert Judith Leblein-Josephs said. "1 look back at my dad. He had two pairs of shoes: his work shoes and his funeral shoes. Look in the closet of a male empty-nester. He has shoes for everything: boating shoes, hiking shoes, golf shoes, tennis shoes, running shoes, etc." It's also a good idea to include programming specifically geared toward adults. Water yoga and lap swims will help get people in the door. Many aquatic centers have found success with poolside dinners, adult- only swim times and couples' nights. No one in the recreation and entertainment industry has done a better job of attracting boomers than Disney World, Leblein-Josephs said. Nearly a decade ago, the company recognized that boomers had time, money and energy—but nowhere to spend it. They marketed their facility as a place to have fun without kids, thanks to night clubs, restaurants and first-class resorts. "They got it, and they've been capitalizing on it ever since," Leblein-Josephs said. "When you see things like that, you have to capitalize on it." However recreation facility managers decide to address boomers' needs, they should take great pains to educate patrons about the programs. Explain how water yoga helps relieve stress, for example, or why weight training is important to maintain bone density. "Education has to be infused in much of the programming," Rothschadl said. "This generation is the most highly educated generation. They tend to be lifelong learners." Pro Shop Stock In addition to your programming, your pro shop also should reflect the boomers' interests and needs. The generation currently has 76 million members in the workforce and accounts for the majority of the country's luxury car,jewelry and gourmet food sales. As such, they're also likely to be valuable customers at your pro and fitness shops. In order to attract their business, however, you have to stock items that appeal to their sense of style and their interest in goods that make their busy lives easier, more comfortable and more convenient. Here are three items that will hit the mark: PEDOMETERS AND ACCELEROMETERS Boomers played a huge role in creating today's results-driven and goal-oriented culture. When they exercise, they want to know whether they're hitting their targets and doing enough to improve their health. Pedometers and accelerometers help them gauge whether they're doing enough. A recent study sponsored by the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) translated guidelines for 30 minutes of daily moderate-intensity physical activity into steps. To meet the recommendations of both the CDC and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), this equates to walking 3,000 steps in 30 minutes, or three daily bouts of 1,000 steps in 10 minutes. "Walking is one of the easiest forms of physical activity, and one that most people can do to meet recommendations for daily exercise," said Simon J. Marshall, Ph.D., lead author of the study. "Most people have an instinct about the length of time or the distance they walk. A pedometer can help count steps, but when you also try to walk at least 1,000 steps in 10 minutes on a regular basis, you may gain significant health benefits. For inactive people, setting smaller targets can help them start a program to meet general physical activity guidelines and enhance their health and wellness." The pedometers and accelerometers are also excellent to market toward golfers, who would rather be on the course than in the gym. Researchers have concluded that walking 16 holes of golf http://www.reemanagement.com/feature_print.php?fid=200802fe03 7/19/2012 A Booming Market -- Recreation and Fitness for Baby Boomers Page 5 of 5 provides more than 130 percent of the recommended 10,000 steps per day for healthy living. Furthermore, during the four to five hours typically spent golfing, those who used a golf cart accumulated nearly 64 percent of the recommended 10,000 daily steps. RECOVERY GEAR As boomers age, their aches and pains may become more profound. When there is trauma to a muscle, tendon or ligament, inflammation occurs. Doctors treat such sprains using the tried-and-true acronym RICE: rest, ice, compression and elevation. Boomers, however, are a time-conscious and goal-oriented group. Nothing will turn them off of exercising quicker than a cumbersome sports injury that impacts their mobility and lifestyle. To rectify this, proactive shops stock up on items that both hasten recovery and are simple to use. One hot new item makes therapy as easy as wearing a garment or sliding on a sleeve. The system, a favorite among professional football and soccer players, combines a compressive garment that has pockets positioned over the quadriceps, hamstrings, calves, shoulders and lower back, and sleeves for the ankle, knee and elbow. The technology includes a re-usable hot and cold therapy system. "I slip on a sleeve after training, and I don't have to worry about it," said professional goalkeeper Dario Sala, adding, "Whether you're a professional athlete or someone who works out a few times a week, you want something that's going to help you recover quickly without interrupting your daily life. If it's not easy, people won't do it." HANDHELD EXERCISERS Boomers traditionally have used cardio equipment and walking as parts of their fitness regimens. Although walking offers excellent cardiovascular benefit and works out the lower body, it does little to exercise the upper torso. There are now lightweight devices with unique resistance capabilities that allow walkers to simultaneously use their upper body and lower body—getting twice the fitness benefit in the same amount of time. They also can be used on treadmills, bikes and steppers in the gym. The grippers help strengthen grips, wrists, arms, chests and backs—areas where boomers may lose strength as they age. The devices also are touted to stimulate the circulatory, pulmonary and lymphatic systems, giving users a potential partner in their preventative health care program. m Copyright 2006 Recreation Management.All rights reserved. http,//www.reemanagement.com/feature_print.php?fid=200802feO3 7/19/2012 Active Recreation Tops Lifestyle Desires for Older Baby Boomers, Senior Citizens Page 1 of 5 SENIOR JOURNAL.COM-Senior Citizens Information and News ♦Front Page ♦Search •Contact Us •Advertise in Senior Journal Senior Journal: Today's News and Information for Senior Citizens &Baby Boomers SeniorJournal.com More Senior Cititen News and Womptlon Than Any Olney Source-Senlorjournalxprn INDEX Reverse MOrtQaQe Get Instant Supplemental Medicare Insurance Quotes. FRONT PAGE PAGE TWO •Go to more on Features for Senior Citizens or More Senior News on the Front Page More Headlines •General Features Reverse Mortgage Calculator •Find Help •SENIOR ALERTS •Odds&Ends Health-Fitness Find the Best Medicare Advantage Plans for Seniors •Acing •Alzheimer's& E-mail this page to a friend! Dementia Features for Senior Citizens •Fitness •Health/Medicine Active Recreation Tops Lifestyle Desires for •Medical Older Baby Boomers, Senior Citizens Research •NulritionlVilamin Del Webb survey finds adventure activities emerging for active adults April 13,2007—A new survey of lifestyle interests among a select group of Baby Government Boomers and senior citizens shows that active recreation,especially adventurous •Politics pursuits,such as hiking and river rafting,is emerging as a top interest for these older •Medicare Americans.It challenges conventional thinking about"senior"recreation,according to •Medicare Druo Del Webb,the nation's largest builder of active adult communities for people over age Program 54. •Medicare Q&A- Related Stories Topping the lifestyle interests were health and fitness Dear Marci activities,including strength training and cardio workouts,in •Medicaid New Sun City Peachtree Keeps Lip with this survey of Del Webb residents and prospective residents. •Social Security Populalion Formerly "It's all about the lifestyle at a Del Webb community,"said •Social Security. Known as Senior National Director of Lifestyle Operations for Pulte Homes Judy Medicare O&A Citizens Julison. Enjoying Life Del Webb spokesman •Books shares insights about "Although interest in many passive recreation activities still boomers and seniors exists,demand for more active forms of lifestyle programming •Enlertainmenl has emerged as a top priority among current residents and •Features April 13,2007 prospective hamebuyers. •Grandparents •Senior Statistics Baby Boomers Seeking "Even adventure programming,such as hiking,climbing and a Different Retirement river rafting,are appealing to a much larger percentage of our •Senior Stars L_1feu1v1§-At Home residents than we have seen in past years." •Sex&Seniors As the largest Adventure activities emerging •Sports demographic ages,a •Travel new housing product Swimming,golf,and bowling topped sports,athletic,and •Senior Volunteers emerges to change the outdoor pursuits,but surprisingly,adventure activities like way—and the where— kayaking,hiking,and even hang gliding are quickly working On The Web older Americans retire- their way up the scale.Hang glidinq(parasailinglparachuting •Links-Senior March 8,2007 was ranked as extremely Important as a lifestyle offering by •Senior Friendly 6%of the respondents-nearly equal to the 6.1%of respondents who ranked Business Links Senior Citizens Packing competitive running the same. •Sites We Like Up and Heading Home from Retirement Meccas Team sports like softball and tennis also ranked high. Nearly 20%of respondents Elderly Issues USA Today finds a ranked softball extremely important )and nearly 25%of respondents ranked tennis http://senior ournal.com/NEWS/Features/2007/7-04-13-ActiveRecreation.htm 7/19/2012 Active Recreation Tops Lifestyle Desires for Older Baby Boomers, Senior Citizens. Page 2 of 5 •Elder Care •Assistance for challenge facing the same. Elderly communities in North, Leading the charge with adventure programming for Del Webb is Anthem outside Midwest-Feb.26,2007 Housin Denver,Colorado,where lifestyle director Scott Hysler has implemented skydiving, Money Women Report More white water rafting,hot air ballooning,sports flying,hang gliding and even•Discounts Emotional'Distress' parachuting adventures. •Guarding Your About Retirement Than "The world record for senior rollerblading was set at Sun City Huntley in Huntley. Wealth for Seniors Do Men Illinois,"said Julison,"I believe we will continue to see activities emerge that reflect •Money Matters Adults more optimistic this newer interest in adventure and other forms of active versus passive recreation •Reverse about retirement pursuits." Mortgage planning but not doing it •Retirement April 3,2007 Top sports.athletic and outdoor adventure Pursuits:, ,,, Thinking Activity Percent ranked"extremely important" •gRinion. Senior Citizen Couples Swimming..................55.2% Retiring in 2007 Need Goff..........................49.2% $215.000 to Cover Bowling.....................34.4% Health Care Costs Fishing......................30.1% Fidelity says rising CanceinglKayaking......26.2% health costs could Increasing in popularity: consume 50%of Social Security benefit Hikinglclimbing/rappelling...................18.0% March 28,2007 River rafting.....................................17,8% Downhill skiing,,..........b........... ....... 9.1% Americans Say a Secure Rollerblading.................................... 7.3% Retirement Not Possible Competitive running........................... 6.1% for Middle Income Hang gliding/parasailing/parachuting..... 6.0% F milies Total respondents=3,584 Only 37 percent in poll Health and fitness still strong say it is possible for most Americans Confirming the importance to this demographic of staying in shape,working out March 20,2007 remains a top priority for Del Webb residents and prospective buyers.Approximately 77%of respondents to the survey indicated they workout at least three days per Experts Predict Top week.Fewer than 6%of the respondents indicated they work out zero days per Trends in Marketing to week. Baby Boomers in 2007 Among health and fitness related activities,walking and cardiovascular equipment Markel gels attention workouts(treadmills,etc.)top the list.Balance training programs such as Pilates,Tai due to its size-$21 Chi,and yoga are on the rise with more than 51%of respondents saying these were trillion in spending power extremely important to programming.At Sun City Hilton Head in Bluffton,S.C.,the March 6,2007 trend can be seen in real lime:Pilates,Tai Chi,and yoga were not offered as classes at the community's opening in 1996,but have been introduced in the past Baby Boomers Report few years. Worse Health,More Pain,Less Physical "Although our active adult residents have health and fitness interests still aligned Ability Than Did Senior with those of past years in many ways,"said Julison,"We are witnessing an Citizens at Same Age emergence of new or broadened programming pursuits and a shift in lifestyle Dramatic decline in priorities." disability among people An interesting trend seen al communities with a high-percentage of still-working 65 and older residents,like Bridgewater by Del Webb outside Detroit, Mich„is that fitness March 5,2007 facilities get a"workout"earlier In the morning and later in the evening than those communities with a higher percentage of truly"retired"residents.Bridgewater Read more Features residents tend to use the facilities before and after work,with a general peak in late for Senior Citizens afternoon and early evening,compared to the traditional model of peak facility use also see Retirement during the 9 a.m.to 5 p.m.work day. and Homes& Communities Top health and fitness pursuits: ,u Activity Percent ranked"extremely important" Walking..... ...82.0% Cardiovascular equipment workouts......__b b.78.8% Health and fitness immunizations.................68.7% Strength/weight training equipment workout...67.4% Water aerobics exercise classes/ Water-based fitness_.............................63.0% Swimming............................................62.5% http://seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Features/2007/7-04-13-ActiveReereation.htm 7/19/2012 Active Recreation Tops Lifestyle Desires for Older Baby Boomers, Senior Citizens Page 3 of 5 Increasing in popularity: Biking.......... ..............ii.................56.7010 Balance training programs(yoga,Tai Chi,Pilates)...51.3% Personal training..............................................41.8% Spinning....................................................... .18.1% Total respondents=3,941 Golf still integral to programming Golf remains a popular pastime with Del Webb residents and prospective residents.Nearly 40%of respondents indicated they play seasonal golf at least one time per week and nearly 65%of respondents indicated they play seasonal golf at least occasionally.Only 36%of respondents indicated they never play golf.This compares to a 12.3%golfer participation rate for people the same ages from the general population of the United States,according to the National Golf Association. Internal measurements also suggest that not only are there more golfers within Del Webb communities but that Del Webb golfers play more than twice as many rounds of golf as other age 50 and over persons. Golfers at Del Webb communities play an average of 103 rounds per year across the Sun Belt and 54 rounds per year in the four-season climates.This compares to 19 rounds per year for U.S.golfers who are 55 to 59 years old,25 rounds per year for golfers age 60 to 64,and slightly more than 40 rounds per year for golfers who are age 65 or older according to the National Golf Foundation. Of the nearly 80 Del Webb communities in existence today,19 have at least one golf course located within the community and 27 offer a golf benefits program partnering with local courses for discounted rates and fees exclusively for Del Webb residents. Golf frequency Ofplav: Frequency of Play Respondents Never.........................................35.5% Less than one time per week...........24.6% 1-2 times per week........................21.1% 3-4 times per week,.......................15.1% 5-6 times per week—.................-- 3.3% 7 times per week........................... 0.4% Total respondents=3,584 Passive recreation continues to be in demand Although the trend is toward more active recreation opportunities,passive recreation options are still integral to Del Webb programming.Creative outlets are seeing an increase in demand as well as the increasing interest in technology among the demographic. In media and technology,general computer technology ranked highest among interests with approximately 45%of respondents indicating it was extremely important . Most popular creative outlets were ceramics/pottery/clay works,painting and drawing,and wood crafting. New fad scrap booking is on the rise within the group,with 16%of respondents indicating it was extremely important Top crafts and cultural art pursuits: rn Activity Percent ranked"extremely important' CeramicslPotterylClayworks..........28.4% Painting and Drawing...................27.2% Wood Crafting.............................27.1% Stained Glass Making...................26.9% Knitting......................................22.8% Total respondents=3,204 Top media and technology pursuits: Activity Percent ranked"extremely important Computer technology-general.........44.4% Photography..................................33.5% Computer Graphics- --....... .........33.2% Desktop publishing.........................27.6% TelevisonlCable TV Programming......25.7% Total respondents=3,536 http:l/seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Features/2007/7-04-13-ActiveRecreation.him 7/19/2012 Active Recreation Tops Lifestyle Desires for Older Baby Boomers, Senior Citizens Page 4 of 5 Gender diff erences Most questions were similarly answered by both genders,but some stood out as significant.Both males and females indicated a high percentage o2 fitness workouts,with 76%of males and 77%of females saying they workout at least three days per week, Men,however,were overwhelmingly more frequent golfers than women.More than 71%of men indicated they play seasonal goff at least occasionally,with nearly 46%indicating they play at least one to two times per week. More than 56%of women indicated they play al least occasionally, and only 33%indicated they play at least one to two times per week. Lifestyle survey confines programming Surveyed on a variety of topics,respondents to the lifestyle interest survey confirmed current programming in Del Webb communities and affirmed directions headed toward an even more active lifestyle.Components of adventure programming have been implemented in several communities since late 2005 and the Company expects to expand the program as new communities open. "Based on what we know about our residents today and what we have learned from over 45 years as a leader in the active adult homebuilding industry,connecting amenity and program offering with how the resident lifestyle is enriched will continue to remain a critical priority at Del Webb communities,"said Julison. "Programming that encompasses multiple dimensions of health and wellness and responds to new trends and interests that may emerge is a focus for today,especially as the Baby Boomer generation continues to move in to our communities and helps to mold the current and future programming options,"concluded Julison. About the survey Conducted under guidance from the ProMatura Group,Pulte Homes, Inc.surveyed current and prospective residents of its Del Webb communities in November 2006 on lifestyle interests in an effort to validate current and emerging trends related to lifestyle amenities,programs and services to ensure alignment with the needs and interests of our residents and prospective homebuyers of Del Webb communities.A total of 5,138 people responded to the survey. I"Using a 10-point scale,with 10 as most important,respondents ranked these items as an 8,9,or 10. '2'Male respondents=1,961;female respondents=1,779 13j Male respondents=1,961;female respondents=1,779 About Pulte Homes Pulte Homes,Inc.,(NYSE:PHM),based in Bloomfield Hills,Mich.,is a FORTUNE 150 company with operations in 52 markets and 27 states.In 2006,it delivered 41,487 homes and generated consolidated revenues of$14.3 billion,During its 57-year history,the company has constructed nearly 500,000 homes.In 2006,Pulte Homes received the most awards in the J,D,Power and Associates'R'New Home-Builder Customer Satisfaction Study,sm',marking the seventh-straight year Pulte achieved this distinction.Under its Del Webb brand,Pulte is the nation's largest builder of active adult communities for people age 55 and better. Its DiVosla brand is renowned in Florida for its Built Solid,Tm,building system and distinctive master-planned communities. Pulte Mortgage LLC is a nationwide lender offering Pulte customers a wide variety of loan products and superior service. Websites: http:Ilwww_aulle_com;http:llwww.detwebb.com;http:/lwww.divosta.com SOURCE Pulte Homes,Inc. Search for more about this topic on SenlorJournal.com GC+agi£° bolfiMILd ID Web i SenlorJournal.com Click to More Senior News on the Front Pace Copyright:5eniorJoumal.com http://seniorjoumal.com/NEWS/Features/200717-04-13-ActiveRecreation.htm 7/19/2012 Active Recreation Tops Lifestyle Desires for Older Baby Boomers, Senior Citizens Page 5 of 5 Published by New Tech Media-www.NewTechMedia.corn Other New Tech Media alas nxJude.CardeSulheaand cam,DgthJaniaek cam,www 0ewey5auare Gom,$A5enwrs co m,prunoanner com,etc E-mail-e6tor(cD.5enior,lournal.com http:l/seniorjournal.com/NEWS/Features/200717-04-13-ActiveRecreation.htm 7/19/2012 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bls.govlspo#light Sports and Exercise May 2008 SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS 'what percentage of people (aged 15 years and older) who live in the United States '[ participated in sports and exercise activities on an average day in recent years? About 16 I percent. In comparison, consider that the number of people who watched television on an average day is roughly five times larger. These charts,which display data from the American Time Use Survey,take a closer look at people who spend time in sports and exercise activities. -A U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 1 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bls.gov/spotlight Exercise Statistics All Over the Map People living in the Pacific, New England, and Mountain regions of the country are more likely to participate in sports or exercise activities than those in other regions. In fact, those living in the Pacific region are about 50 percent more likely to exercise on an average day than are those in the East South Central and West South Central regions. Percent of people aged 15 years and older who engaged in sports or exercise activities on an average day, by region,2003-06 New � i=ng�end i West N" Middle • Central AtM�rtac East r oftl Cef:val w soul h FIER-5-- I Contra' South Pacific Control U 13% U 15% 1:1 1S% 18% E 2o% m U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 2 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bls.gov/spotlight More School, More Play People with higher levels of education were more likely to participate in sports and exercise. Among people aged 25 years and older, those with a bachelor's degree or higher were more than twice as likely to participate in sports and exercise activities on an average day during the 2003-06 period as those with a high school diploma or less. f Percent of people aged 25 years and older who engaged in sports and exercise activities on an average day, by educational attainment, 2003-06 Bachelors degree and higher — — - Some college or associate degree — High school graduates, no college Less than a high school diploma 5 10 15 20 25 Percent U.S.BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 3 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bls.gov/spotlight Walking is Most Popular Exercise Activity In recent years, of the relatively small group of people in the United States aged 15 years and older who engaged in sports or exercise activities on an average day, about 30 percent walked for exercise, making walking the most popular form of exercise overall. Basketball was the team sport that people engaged in most frequently. On an average day, 5 percent of those who exercised played basketball. U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 4 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bls.gov/spotlight (NOTE: Data in this chart and those that follow are based on the approximately 16 percent of persons who engaged in any sports or exercise activity on an average day.) Percent of people aged 15 years and older who engaged in sports or exercise activities on an average day, by specific activity, 2003-06 Walking 30.0 i Weightlifting 13.1 i Using cardiovascular equiprn.nt 12.7 i Sw hTdng,surfing,water skiing 8.4 i Running 7.1 Basketbag 5,1 i Golfing -41 Cycling 3,2 Aerobics 3.1 Bow ling 2.0 Racquet sports IM 1.6 Foatba♦l �W 1.5 Baseball,softball 1.4 Dancing 1.4 Yoga 1.3 Soccer 1.2 Volleyball 0.8 FHdng 0.8 Martial arts 0.7 Equestrian sports 0.6 Werblading 0.6 Skiing,ice skating,snow boarding 0.6 Hockey 0,1 WestUng 0.1 Gymnastics 0.1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 U.S.BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 6 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bis.gov/spotlight Differing Sports and Exercise Activities for Men and Women Men were slightly more likely than women to participate in sports and exercise activities on an average day, but their preferences for specific forms of exercise differed markedly. Football, basketball, golf, and soccer were dominated by male participants. About 96 percent of football players were male, for example. Yoga and aerobics primarily had female participants. Bowling and swimming, surfing, and water skiing were the most gender-neutral activities,with nearly equal shares of men and women participating in them. -IVK U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 6 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bls.gov/spotlight Percent distribution by sex of people aged 15 years and older who engaged in sports or exercise activities on an average day, by activity, 2003-06 Wn ■Women Football 96 Basketball Golfing 82 Soccer 60 v Baseball,softball 'rte Racquet sports 6& Ca cling 66 Vlkight6fting 64 Running 56 Fildng 56 Bow ling 54 Sw imring,surfing,w ater sluing 47 I Using cardiovascular equipment 44 Dancing 44 Viking 43 Yoga 20 Aerobics 17 Percent 100 �A U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 7 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bls.gov/spotlight Sports and Exercise Activities among Various Age Groups The specific sports and exercises people do vary by age. People aged 15 to 24 years were more likely to participate in team sports such as basketball, football, and soccer than those 25 and older. About one-half of those who walked for exercise—the sports and exercise activity that people most frequently engaged in overall — were aged 55 years and older. By contrast, racquet sports were the sports and exercise activities that had the most equal distribution of participants across age groups for those aged 15 to 24 years, aged 25 to 54, and aged 55 and older. 'A U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 9 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bls.govlspotlight Percent distribution by age of people aged 15 years and older who engaged " in sports or exercise activities on an average day, by activity, 2003-06 m Aged 15-24 ■25-54 55 and older Basketball Football Soccer - I Baseball,softball Dancing Bow ling Running liking Pacquelsports Sw irming,surfing,water skiing V ftht6fting Golfing Cycling Aerobics Using cardiovascular equiiprrent Mldng Yoga 0 Percent 100 t U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 9 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bis.gov/spotlight Companions During Sports and Exercise Activities In the United States, people who exercise were about as likely to exercise alone as with a companion present. Of those aged 15 years and older who engaged in a sports and exercise activity on an average day in 2003-06, about one-half did the activity alone. Men and women were equally likely to exercise alone. But women were more likely to engage in sports and exercise activities with family and men were more likely to engage in these activities with friends. Percent distribution of people aged 15 years and older who engaged in sports or exercise activities on an average day, by sex and the presence of others, 2003-06 so Men 50 40 c 30 20 10 I 0 Alone Family Friends,neighbors, Co-workers acquaintances -A U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 10 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bis.gov/spotlight Time Spent Exercising Almost 75 percent of people aged 15 years and older who engaged in a sports and exercise activity on an average day in 2003-06 did so for less than two hours. The most common exercise duration was between 30 and 59 minutes. Percent distribution by length of time spent exercising of people aged 15 years and older who engaged in sports or exercise activities on an average day, 2003-06 4 or more hours; less than 30 minutes; 10% 2 hours to 3 hours 59-' minutes: 19% 30 to 59 ninutes; 29% 1 hour 30 rrinutes to i hour 59 ninutes; 11% 1 hour to 1 hour 29 minutes;25% U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS �� BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bls.gov/spotlight Hours Spent on Various Exercise Activities The average length of time spent exercising for people aged 15 years and older who engaged in a sports and exercise activity was one and one-half hours. The amount of time varies considerably by the type of activity. Those who used cardiovascular exercise equipment, did aerobics, ran,lifted weights,walked, or did yoga spent the least time exercising. Those who danced, played baseball or softball, bowled, played football, hiked or golfed spent the most time doing sports activities. Amount of time that people aged 15 years and older who engaged in sports or exercise activities on an average day spent engaged in that activity, 2003-06 All sports and exercise activities Ding cardiovascular equipment 0 7 Aerobics 0.8 Rinning 0.9 V\"htlif ling 0-9 Walking 0.9 Yoga 0.9 cycling 1.2 Sw orrwing,surfing,water skiing 1,7 Racquet sports 1.9 Basketball 2 Soccer1 Dancing 2.3 Baseball,softbal 2.4 Bow ling 2.5 Football 2.5 Faking 2.6 Golfing 3.3 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Fours per day U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 12 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bls.gov/spotlight Making Time to Exercise Sports and exercise time is often scheduled around other activities, such as work. Employed people aged 25 to 54 years who engaged in sports and exercise activities on an average day in 2003-06 were most likely to participate in these activities during the late afternoon and evening hours on days they worked, and during the morning and early afternoon hours on non-workdays. (Note: The percentages associated with each time refer to the hour that starts at that time. For example, the percentages associated with 1:00 AM cover the interval from 1:00 AM to 1:59 AM.) Percent of employed people aged 25 to 54 years who engaged in sports and exercise activities on an average day, by hour of daywhen exercising, workdays and non-workdays, 2003-06 25 Non-warkdays 20 15 m m IL 10 Workdays 5 0 12:00 2.00AM 4:DDAM 6:00AM 8:OOAM 1100AM 4.00 2:00PM 49OPM 6:OOPM a:90PM SOOPM M Idnight Noon U.S.BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 13 BLS SPOTLIGHT ON STATISTICS SPORTS AND EXERCISE www.bis.gov/spotlight For More Information To learn more,see: • BLS American Time Use Survey homepage (www.bls.gov/tus/) General Information For more information,please call (202) 691-5200. Media Contact The news media can contact the BLS Press Assistant at (202) 691-5902. Note: Data in text, charts and tables are the latest available at the time of publication. U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS 14 Fitness Trends for 2011 - Exercise and Fitness Trends for 2010 Page 1 of 3 SAVE 15%ounING T11E,GREAT GETAWAY ;- x . Health Ail =,COI1 Exercise Snare Fitness Trends for 2011 Free Exercise Newsletter! What's ahead for the taming year Enlerema,l address Sign up By Paige Waehner,About tom Guide Updated June 03,2011 Discuss In my forum About cam Hearths Disease and Condition content i5 reviewed by Our Medical Review Board This year was a tough one for us in many ways,but we saw some great fitness trends emerge. While being overweight Is still a problem,many of us had a pretty good exercise year with circuit training,Interval training,toning shoes,hot yoga and more. It's time to lank Into the future to see what's In store for us In 2011. The American Council on Exercise(ACE)announced the= fitness trends for 2011 and it looks like we'll spend more time focusing on health,stress-reduction and finding support for our health and weight loss goals. After the past year,that sounds pretty good. 1.Economic Uoswing 2010 was a tough economic year for many of us and we can only hope ACE Is right in predicting an economic upswing in 2011. ACE looked at the personal training business over the past year,finding that things are slowly getting better in the fitness industry. They're predicting that the economic Improvement will motivate us to get back to fitness,whether It's Tay Iurvo^Getty Images hiring a_trainer or getting back to the gym.If you abandoned your workouts because of the economy,get ready for the new year by easing back Into your routine: • Get Back on Track • The Right Way to Fall at Exercise • Get Started With Exercisg 2.A Focus on Wellness Wellness is the buzzword of 2011,an all-Inclusive term that often refers to our well-being as a whole. we're much more health-conscious these days and,because of that,ACE predicts we'll see a growing relationship between healthcare companies and health clubs to cover all of our needs, not just exercise and Fitness. This might Include things like nutritional counseling,physical therapy or other types of medical services. 1 think many of us would enjoy a more Integrated system that takes care of Don Farrah/GUty Images everything-mind,body and spirit. 3.Stress Reduction 2010 was a stressful year,If my clients were any Indication. I witnessed meltdowns of varying degrees In almost everyone 1 worked with,but I also t noticed that my clients were much more aware of stress and how it can • affect everything from mood to weight gain.The good news Is,ACE predicts we'll see more people turning to exercise to help manage stress David Sufherland/Getty and you may even see more fitness programming focusing on stress Images reduction. Maybe 2011 will be the least stressful year ever...or at least less stressful than 2010. • Exercise and Stress • Workouts for Stress ReheF • Reader Tips: How to reduce stress with exercise • Stretches to Relieve Stress 4.Finding Support Through Social Networking If you're an exercise gearhead,you spent 2011 using all kinds of things like heart rate wonitors,fitness aoos,and music olavers,and ACE predicts social networking sites like Facebook,Twitter and YouTube will be a big part of fitness in the coming year. Fitness professionals will use It to stay In touch with clients and as a compliment personal training sessions. Now my clients will never escape me-I love It! ACE also predicts that exercisers will use social networking sites as online motivational support Getty Images/b+mrtri systems.It's nice to know that there are more things to do on Facebook verWs ohs than Farmville. http://exercise.about.com/od/healthinjuries/tp/Fitness-Trends-For-2011.htm 7/19/2012 Fitness Trends for 2011 - Exercise and Fitness Trends for 2010 Page 2 of 3 S.Workout Buddies If you've ever had a workout buddy,you know how both annoying and motivating they can be. Annoying because you have to show up for your 1 workout,even if you don't want to. Motivating because you have to show up for your workout,even If you don't want to. In 2011,ACE predicts we'll see more people relying on that type of support system,whether it's with a workout buddy or through peer groups and fitness classes at the gym. Ryas McVay Getty Images 6.Popular Workouts-Booteamp,Zumba and TItX _A L=Larn came on strong in a big way In 2010,1 think because It's more pleasant to do crazy things like burl2ce and walking lunges when we have the support of equally challenged fellow exercisers. ACE predicts we'll continue the bootcamp torture in 2011,but we'll also get our groove on vage iyaehner with dance classes like Zumba-a fusion of Latin music and easy-to-follow dance moves that makes exercise seem less like,well,exercise. Another popular type of training In 2011 will be TRX suspension training, an innovative system of straps that allows you to use your own body weight as leverage for a completely different kind of workout. It looks like we'll be getting down to business while having a little fun In the coming year. 7.Small Group Training s When we workout,most of exercise alone,with a friend or In a large group yZ fitness class. But,what about small group training? If you've never considered it,2011 will be a good time to look into it. ACE predicts small --. group training will grow In popularity,giving us more options for our workouts. It's a great way to save money and add a soclal element to Getty Ima17,5teve Cole Your workouts. In a small group,you get to know each other more and create a bond you often don't have In larger classes. Look for more opportunities In the coming year through personal training studios or specialty fitness classes. S.Youth-Based Fitness Most adults probably remember being a kid and being told to go outside and play,sometimes not coming home until dinner time. These days,we actually worry that our kids aren't being active enough. We don't feel safe letting them run around untended,yet we know they need to be more r active to avoid childhood obesity. It can be tough coming up with solutions,but ACE predicts we'll start tackling the problem in 2011 with 5? more youth-oriented fitness classes In schools and health clubs.Michelle Obama's L,et's ove M Is also focused on healthy kids with a variety of r cia Getty Images fnt+Sr programs like Let's Move Salad Bars to Schools and Set's Move Outside. - Does Your Child Need a Personal Tr in r? !,k _ • Weiaht Loss for Teens 9.More Coroarate Fitness Proarams In my office days,I was handcuffed to my desk,which made exercise extremely difficult. These days,many of us are still desk-bound,but our employers are starting to realize how crucial exercP5 Is For our productivity at work. In fact,I think a dally naptlme would do wonders �. for our productivity,but no one asked me. The good news Is that ACE Is predicting we'll see more companies offering Incentives for employees to exercise such as: Getty Images+Yellow nog In-house personal trainers Ptoductons • Discounts to local health clubs • Wellness programs to encourage healthy lifestyles. This Is good news,considering how much time we spend sitting and how that affects everything from our metabolism to our ability to concentrate. 10.Personal Training Credentlals If you are a trainer or you've worked with one,there's a chance you've met one with questionable experience and advice. There are bozos in any profession,but fitness organizations are working hard to eliminate the bozo factor. Last year,ACE predicted consumers would be more vigilant f about hiring personal trainers certified through an accredited certifying organization. They're predicting the same for 2011 and IDEA is ramping up that effort with LDEA_igngss Connti°t,a free service where you can find trainers with verified credentials. http://exercise.about.com/odAhealthinjuries/tp/Fitness-Trends-For-201 Lhtrn 7/19/2012 Fitness Trends for 2011 - Exercise and Fitness Trends for 2010 Page 3 of 3 Getty tmapes Barg More About Personal Training AVS�n • How to Be a Personal Tr @mer • Accredited Personal Tramma Organizations • Choosing d Personal Trainer • 10 Reasons to Hire a Personal Trainer Related Searches Economic Uoswma Getty Images fitness Trends Interval Training American Council On Exercise Hot Yoae http://exercise.about.com/od/healthinjuries/tp/Fitness-Trends-For-2011.htm 7/19/2012 rye ammiWI American Heart Stroke Aaaociadon AssocloWn. Statistical Fact Sheet 2012 Update Overweight & Obesity Youth • Among children ages 2-19, about 1 in 3 are overweight and obese (BMI-for-age at or above the 85" percentile of the 2000 CDC growth charts.): - 32.1% of all boys - 31.3% of all girls • Among children ages 2-19, about 1 in 6 are obese (BMI-for-age at or above the 951h percen- tile of the CDC growth charts.): - 17.8% of all boys - 15.9% of all girls Prevalence of overweight and obesity among students in grades 9 through 12 by sex and race/ethnicity. 23.3 24 18.7 16.7 19.5 . 16.9 17.5 15 3'a 13,B13.a 1 13.2 A, 10 ' a.z NH•Whit•Ilel•s NH WI NN B!•akM.lez NH Gluck Nispar#cMales HispWo F•rrWas Fw W" Rem•1es ■0verwetght aobnsa NH indicates non-Hispanic.Data derived from Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States,2009,Table 90. • Overweight adolescents have a 70% chance of becoming overweight adults. This increases to 80% if 1 or both parents are overweight or obese. • The prevalence of BMI-for-age values 295th percentile of the 2000 CDC growth charts in chil- dren 6 to 11 years of age was 20% in 2007 to 2008 compared with 4.0% in 1971 to 1974. • The prevalence of BMI-for-age values 295th percentile in adolescents 12 to 19 years of age was 18% in 2007 to 2008 compared with 6% in 1971 to 1974. • Compared with 1973 to 1974, the proportion of children 5 to 17 years of age who were obese was 5 times higher in 2008 to 2009. 02011 American Hearl Association,Inc All rights reserved.Unauthorized use prohibited. ._ rr -. _ _ _ P P - - WLI l - '•-�_— -- � — - Anlerlean AurreriCan Heart Stroke Awmdution Ass wWan. Overweight & Obesity - 2012 Statistical Fact Sheet Trends in the prevalence of obesity among US children and adolescents by age and survey year (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 1971-1974, 1976-1980, 1988-1994, 1999-2002 and 2005--2008) I 1e i ,fi, ra.o- lit 14 12 f, n r43 S 1a 0 1= n o.t 4 2 8-11 Ass Owe) 12-i 9 ■1971-1974 o197f 1980 91985-1894 61999.20ff1 b200G3= Data derived from Health, United States.2010:With Special Feature on Death and Dying.NCHS,2011, Adults • Among Americans age 20 and older, 149.3 million are overweight or obese (BMI of 25.0 kg/ m2 and higher): - 78.0 million men. - 71.3 million women. • Of these, 75.0 million are obese (BMl of 30.0 kg/M2 and higher): - 34.9 million men. -40.1 million women. • Among Americans age 20 and older, the following are overweight or obese (BMI of 25.0 and higher): - For non-Hispanic whites, 72.3 percent of men and 59.3 percent of women. - For non-Hispanic blacks, 70.8 percent of men and 77.7 percent of women. - For Mexican Americans, 77.5 percent of men and 75.1 percent of women. • Of these, the following are obese (BMI of 30.0 and higher): - For non-Hispanic whites, 32.1 percent of men and 32.8 percent of women. - For non-Hispanic blacks, 37.0 percent of men and 51.0 percent of women. - For Mexican Americans, 31.4 percent of men and 43.4 percent of women. 02011 American Heart Association,Inc All rights reserved.Unauthorized use prohibited American American Heart i Stroke Assodatlon AsmmWon. Overweight & Obesity - 2012 Statistical Fact Sheet Costs • The total excess cost related to the current prevalence of adolescent overweight and obesity is estimated to be $254 billion ($208 billion in lost productivity secondary to premature morbid- ity and mortality and $46 billion in direct medical costs). • If current trends in the growth of obesity continue, total healthcare costs attributable to obesity could reach $861 to $957 billion by 2030, which would account for 16% to 18% of US health expenditures. For additional information, charts and tattles, see Chapter 16 of Heart Disease & Stroke Statistics - 2012 Ygdate. Additional charts may be downloaded directly from the online publication at: htt ://circ.ahaiournals.or /looku /doi/10.11611CIR.Ob013e31823ac046 Or at: www.heart.org/statistics The American Heart Association re nests that this document be cited as follows: Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Soliman EZ, Sortie PD, Sotoodehnia N,Turan TN,Virani SS, Wong ND,Woo D,Turner MB; on behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012: published online before print December 15,2011, 10.1161/CIR.Ob013e31823ac046. If you have questions about statistics or any points made in the 2012 Statistical Update, please contact the American Heart Association National Center, Office of Science& Medicine at statistics(Wheart.ora. Please direct all media inquiries to News Media Relations at in uiries heart.or or 214-706-1173. 02011 American Heart Association,Inc.All rights reserved.Unauthorized use prohibited. FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012** FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY2016 FY 2017 Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget General Fund Transfer 92,608 101,195 137,520 172,772 617,616 794,036 755,908 1,015,107 1,161,778 1,080,348 969,500 951,890 736,710 955,886 1,758,372 1,192,882 1,190,936 1,226,053 Parks Expenditures* - - - - (391,405) (468,837) (516,931) (591,707) (718,621) (599,916) (528,942) (500,718) (547,922) (781,806) (787,643) (804,237) (822,444) (842,422) Recreation Expenditures (161,698) (211,169) (230,697) (353,187) (395,141) (546,183) (633,828) (846,811) (1,002,318) (959,372) (756,874) (660,136) (602,054) (724,961) (1,452,577.00) (868,385.00) (844,254) (851,741) Recreation Revenue 80,797 85,713 100,428 131,748 168,930 248,916 394,851 401,259 472,096 454,753 397,579 415,371 462,896 495,561 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Total subsidy to Recreation 80,901 125,456 130,269 221,439 226,211 297,267 238,977 445,552 530,222 504,619 359,295 244,765 139,158 229,400 1,052,577 468,385 444,254 451,741 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Excess 11,707 (24,261) 7,251 (48,667) 391,405 496,769 516,931 569,555 631,556 575,729 610,205 707,125 597,552 726,486 705,795 724,497 746,682 774,312 Less Park Expenditures - - (391,405) (468,837) (516,931) (591,707) (718,621) (599,916) (528,942) (500,718) (547,922) (781,806) (787,643) (804,237) (822,444) (842,422) Fund Surplus (Deficit) 11,707 (24,261) 7,251 (48,667) 0 27,932 0 (22,152) (87,065) (24,187) 81,263 206,407 49,630 (55,320) (81,848) (79,740) (75,762) (68,110) *Prior to Fiscal Year 2004 the Parks and Recreation Departments were reported in separate funds. **Unaudited. Without REC Center FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 Out of lease $100,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Add'I cost to Transfer leave REC Repair to REC Center $50,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 unknown budget number Fiscal Year budgeted Center Total transfer Taxes(2012&2013) $62,000.00 $31,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 FY14 $983,992.00 $774,380.00 $1,758,372.00 School use $90,480.00 $90,480.00 $90,480.00 $90,480.00 janitorial staff wages for facilities used,30 hr/week @ 2 schools, $29/hr FY15 $1,009,002.00 $183,880.00 $1,192,882.00 Rental facility buildout $360,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 3600 SF @$100/SF FY16 $1,038,056.00 $152,880.00 $1,190,936.00 Facility rent $36,000.00 $36,000.00 $36,000.00 $36,000.00 2-36005F studio rehab(FY13) rental price($10/SF) FY17 $1,073,173.00 $152,880.00 $1,226,053.00 Utilities $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 $24,000.00 (Riverfront building and facility rental) Storage unit $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 2 units @$100/month Add'I cost to Expenditure leave REC Refund of memberships $49,500.00 n/a n/a n/a 11%of membership dues refunded Fiscal Year budgeted Center Total expenditure Total cost to leave REC Center $774,380.00 $183,880.00 $152,880.00 $152,880.00 $1,264,020.00 FY14 ($678,197) ($774,380.00) ($1,452,577.00) FY14-FY17 Total Transfer from General Fund FY15 ($684,505) ($183,880.00) ($868,385.00) Notes: FY16 ($691,374) ($152,880.00) ($844,254.00) Preschool/all program registration at Riverfront Admin Bldg. FY17 ($698,861) ($152,880.00) ($851,741.00) Staff will be located in the basement of City Hall,except for registration staff at the Admin building. Estimate for 2 storage units to be rented for all of the various equipment that is currently stored at the REC Center. Staff has not asked if school will waive these fees.Dr.Wakeley provided the cost estimate for janitorial staff. Result: By FY16,if return to 2008 programming levels,costs$460,636 per year to operate at that level.Approximately 120 classes/year,special events,athletics. If we leave the REC Center,an additional$1,177,320 will have to be budgeted out of the General Fund to run Recreation in Yorkville between FY14-FY17. Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid 1s36 From: Jeff Weckbach, Administrative Intern Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: July 18, 2012 C<wrMY Sad �LE ��'` Subject: Referendum outcome analysis Summary A discussion of parks and recreation referendum questions in Illinois, and review of Yorkville specific survey information. Analysis of Illinois referendum questions While the City may not expend public funds on the strict advocacy for or against a referendum question, it may be helpful to look at the history of parks and recreation referendum questions in Illinois. All referendum questions from the past several years are available on the Illinois State Board of Elections webpage - http://www.elections.il.gov/ReferendaProfile/ReferendaSearch.aspx?NavLink=1 This website breaks down the Parks and Recreation Referendums into 3 different categories: Bonds, Taxes and Miscellaneous. All the data for bonds relates to a city or park district issuing some form of bond to build, modify, or maintain a park,pool or recreation facility. The tax questions were all related to increasing taxes to fund the parks or recreation programs. The Miscellaneous category varied although most of the questions were in relation to establishing a park district. Bond referendum questions dating back to 2000 passed at a 48%rate. Of the total, 15 questions were directly related to building or buying a recreation center, and the rate of passing was only 27%. Since 2008 and the economic crisis, all bond questions pass at a rate of 29%. Six questions were specifically related to recreation centers since 2008 and only one of those passed and it was during a general election (also, the bond amount was only for$500,000). Referendum questions related to bonds since 2000 where the bond amount ranged from $4-8 million saw a success rate of 63%, however only three of those were since 2008 and none of these three directly related to purchasing or building a recreation center, rather they were for building pools, buying land, maintaining parks or refinancing bond obligations. Also, only one of those three questions since 2008 were approved by voters. The successful question was on a general election ballot. Bond referendum questions in total have the most success during a general election and it is important to note both bonds which passed related to recreation centers were during a general election. Therefore, the odds to have a bond referendum approved are not strong in this economic climate, but if one were to put a bond referendum on the ballot, a general election would be the most likely to see success, based on historical information. Tax referendum questions since 2000 have a 33% approval rate. Since 2008, that approval rate has decreased slightly to 29%, with the only approvals during a primary or consolidated election. The questions in the miscellaneous category passed at a 65%rate. Since 2008, miscellaneous questions have passed at an 80% rate. Since 2000, questions asking the citizens if they should buy, renovate, develop or expand a recreation center pass at a 60%rate and since 2008 this number was 100% (only 2 questions). The two questions which did pass were both asked during a general election and specifically asked if they should enter into long term leases with the current recreation center and then develop it. The overall success rate of the miscellaneous referendum questions dating back to 2000 shows that election years have 83% of the questions which passed. Based on historical data, if the council were to pursue a question which was general and not related to a bond they would have a greater opportunity to pass the referendum question. Questions related to a recreation facility have received a better response rate if part of a general election., In summation, bond related questions have not had a high success rate in the past few years,but they have a better chance during general elections and if they are between $4-8 million dollars. Any referendum question for a simple tax increase for recreation programs would most likely fail. Finally, miscellaneous parks and recreation referendum questions are more likely to pass than not. But, of the miscellaneous referendum questions, only two reference recreation centers. Analysis of Yorkville-specific information The City just recently completed the analysis of the comprehensive City services survey. From this most recent survey, the following information may be useful: 1) In the second question on the City services survey, the overall satisfaction rankings for "quality of recreation programming offered" and"quantity of creation classes offered" was somewhere between "satisfied" and "neutral" for both categories. These categories ranked as the 1 lth and 13th best satisfaction ratings out of all 19 service categories. a. Out of the 153 comments on the same question(i.e. rank satisfaction of all City services): i. 9 respondents wanted more recreation classes ii. 9 wanted no money to spent on recreation iii. 8 did not want us to buy the REC Center iv. 6 felt current registration fees were too high v. 5 wanted us to buy the REC Center vi. 1 comment wanted us to build a new recreation center vii. 1 wants us to spend less money on recreation viii. 1 was unaware we offered recreation programs ix. 1 felt that we compete with the YMCA x. 1 wants us to evaluate all recreation building alternatives xi. 1 wanted us to consolidate all recreation classes into one location xii. 1 felt that the REC Center should be only run by City staff 2) In the third question on the City services survey, 6.9% of respondents felt that the City Council should make "quality of recreation programming offered" as one of the most important City Council priorities, and 5.6% felt that the City Council should make the "quantity of recreation classes offered" as one of the most important City Council priorities. These two categories ranked as 9th and 12th most important out of 18 categories. a. Out of the 97 comments on the same question(i.e. choose the three most important City services for City Council focus): i. 3 respondents felt that the City should not be in the recreation business. ii. 2 respondents felt that the more classes should be offered. iii. 1 felt that the registration fees were too high. 3) In the fifth question on the City services survey(regarding value of tax dollars), 104 comments were registered. a. 2 respondents did not want the City to buy the REC Center. b. 1 respondent wants the City to buy the REC Center. c. 1 respondent wants Parks and Recreation to be out from the control of City government. 4) In the sixth question, an open ended question on the major advantages and assets of living in Yorkville,recreational amenities was only chosen by 19.2% of respondents. This was the 8th best response out of 9 choices. The 9th response (worst)was transportation at 2.7%. 5) In the 19th question, in which we asked for open comments on improving the quality of life in Yorkville, 304 comments were listed. Of those comments: a. 5 wanted the City to buy the REC Center b. 4 did not want the City to buy the REC Center c. 3 wanted the City stop spending money on recreation d. 2 wanted the City to increase recreation classes and events e. 1 felt that registration fees for recreation classes should be reduced The Parks and Recreation Department hired NIU to conduct a parks and recreation services survey. This survey was completed by mail in 2007,prior to the economic shift, and asked various questions about current recreation and park offerings, as well as future needs of the City. Three separate excerpts from that survey are attached to this memo. The first excerpt asks the respondents to indicate their level of support for a Parks and Recreation Department referendum. When asked in 2007, 75% of respondents indicated they would support a referendum that resulted in a contribution of less than$5 per month(less than $60 per year). That support erodes to 55% for a dollar amount between $5 and $10 (between $60 and $120 per year). The referendum support is only at 23% for a monthly contribution between$11 and $20 per month($132 to $240 per year). The second excerpt shows that that a"facility dedicated fitness and wellness", and "indoor recreational pool", and"recreation center with gym and instructional rooms"were the third, fourth, and fifth most requested recreational amenity by respondents. All three of these needs were met by the lease of the REC Center, in addition to#8, a teen center. The first most requested amenity was paved bike trails, and the second was an outdoor recreational pool (the survey was completed prior to Raging Waves). The third excerpt shows whether respondents had used recreation services or facilities run by other organizations. In 2007, 50% of respondents indicated they had only used Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department programs, followed by the Plano YMCA (23%), Club 47 (11%), Oswegoland Park District(10%), Fox Valley Park District (9%), other(7%), Anytime Fitness (4%), and Cardinal Fitness (2%). Because the REC Center absorbed the Club 47 programs, the primary program offerings are by Parks and Recreation and the Fox Valley(Plano branch) YMCA. Bonds Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the Arlington Heights Park District, Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois, improve through renovation and new construction the parks and community centers at Camelot, Frontier, Heritage and Recreation Parks; acquire park equipment; improve, maintain and protect neighborhood parks and facilities; and issue its bonds to the amount not to Arlington Heights exceed $48,000,000 for the purpose of General Primary 2012 Park District Fail paying the costs thereof? Shall the United City of Yorkville issue general obligations bonds, bearing interest at a rate not to exceed the limitation of applicable law, to an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 for purpose of acquiring land and constructing bike trails within the United City of municipal boundaries of the United City Consolidated 2011 Yorkville Fail of Yorkville? Shall the Western Springs Park District, Cook County, Illinois, construct and equip an all-weather artificial turf field at Spring Rock Park, maintain, improve and preserve its parks and facilities, pay expenses incident thereto and issue its bonds to the amount of $1,000,000 Western Springs for the purpose of paying the cost Consolidated 2011 Park District Fail thereof? Shall the Bartlett Park District, DuPage, Cook and Kane Counties, Illinois, acquire and improve the 138-acre Villa Olivia golf course, ski hill and banquet facility, renovate and expand the Bartlett Aquatic Center and issue its bonds to the amount of $18,000,000 for the purpose of paying the costs General 2010 Bartlett Park District Pass thereof? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the Lake Bluff Park District, Lake County, Illinois, construct and equip an outdoor community pool and related facilities, maintain, improve and preserve its parks and facilities, pay expenses incident thereto and issue its bonds to the amount of $10.7 million Lake Bluff Park for the purpose of paying the costs General 2010 District Fail thereof? Shall bonds in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 be issued by the Village of Freeburg, Illinois for the purpose of renovation, improvement, and expansion of the municipal pool, bearing interest at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate authorized by General 2010 Village of Freeburg Fail statute? Shall the Peotone Park District, Will County, Illinois, purchase, renovate and equip a building, improve the site thereof and issue its bonds to the amount of $500,000 for the purpose of General 2010 Peotone Park District Pass paying the costs thereof? Shall the Carol Stream Park District, DuPage County, Illinois, build and equip a recreation center with an indoor pool to replace the Aldrin Community Center, build, maintain, improve and protect parks, sports fields, pathways and other facilities of said Park District, purchase and improve land and issue its bonds to the amount of $37,000,000 Carol Stream Park for the purpose of paying the costs General Primary 2010 District Pass thereof? Shall Waterloo Park District, in the City of Waterloo, Monroe County, Illinois, undertake the rehabilition and repair of the Park District swimming pool, and related facilities, improvements and costs, and issue its bonds to the Waterloo Park amount of $575,000 for the purpose of General Primary, 2010 District Fail paying costs thereof? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the Midlothian Park District, Cook County, Illinois, build and equip an addition to and alter, renovate, improve and equip the Don Preston Recreation Center, including to provide an indoor lap pool, walking track, playground and fitness center, improve the site thereof and issue its bonds to the amount of Midlothian Park $8,500,000 for the purpose of paying General Primary 2010 District Fail the costs thereof? Shall the River Forest Park District, Cook County, Illinois, acquire the former Oilily property located at 103 Forest Avenue, demolish all or a portion thereof, construct and equip a park district recreation center on the site thereof, and issue its bonds to the River Forest Park amount of $8,000,000 for the purpose General Primary 2010 District Fail of paying the costs thereof? Shall the City of Monticello acquire, construct, install and equip a replacement outdoor swimming pool and children's pool, parking, bathhouse and related facilities, improvements and costs, and issue general obligation bonds, bearing interest at a rate not to exceed the limitations of appliciable law, to the amount of $2,000,000 for Consolidated 2009 City of Monticello Pass such purpose? Shall bonds in an amount not to exceed $4,000,000.00 be issued by the City of Eureka, Illinois, for the purpose of paying the cost of constructing an outdoor swimming pool in the City of Eureka, bearing interest at the rate of not to exceed the greater of 9% per annum or 125% of the rate for the most recent date shown in 20-year G. O. Bonds Index of average municipal bond yields as published in the most recent edition of The Bond Buyer, published in New York, New York, at the time the contract is made for the Consolidated 2009 City of Eureka Fail sale of said bonds? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall Waterloo Park District, in the City of Waterloo, Monroe County, Illinois, for the purpose of a new park acquire approximately 10.82 acres of real estate along Rogers Street, including bond costs, and issue its bonds to the Waterloo Park amount of $385,000 for the purpose of General 2008 District Fail paying the costs thereof? Shall bonds or notes of the Hazel Crest Park District to the amount of Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) be issued for the purpose of constructing a General 2008 Hazel Crest Park Pass swimming pool and aquatic center? Shall the Batavia Park District, Kane County, Illinois, build and equip a community recreation and aquatics center, including administrative offices; improve, repair and alter the Harold Hall Quarry Beach and related facilities; improve the sites thereof; complete other capital development projects; and issue its bonds to the amount of $36,000,000 for the purpose of paying General 2008 Batavia Park District Fail the costs thereof? Shall the Lisle Park District, DuPage County, Illinois, build and equip a new community center, demolish the existing community center at Community Park, improve the site thereof and issue its bonds to the amount of $21,900,000 for the purpose General 2008 Lisle Park District Fail of paying the costs thereof? Shall bonds in the amount of not to exceed $5,500,000 be issued by the Village of Lake Barrington for the purpose of purchasing real property for Village of Lake open space, recreation and community Consolidated 2007 Barrington Pass uses? Shall bonds of the Lemont Park District, Cook, DuPage and Will Counties, to the amount of $16,200,000 be issued for building and improving and constructing wellness centers and Consolidated 2007 Lemont Park District Pass purchasing land for park purposes? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall bonds or notes of the Glen Ellyn Park District, DuPage County, to the amount of $11,900,000 be issued for Glen Ellyn Park the purpose of the payment of land General 2006 District Pass purchased for parks or boulevards? Shall bonds in the amount of $4,200,000 be issued by the City of Palos Heights, Cook County, for the purpose of constructing a Family General 2006 City of Palos Heights Fail Aquatic Center in the City? Shall bonds of the Park Ridge Recreation and Park District, Cook County, Illinois, to the amount of $9,985,000 be issued for the purpose of Park Ridge Park demolishing the Oakton swimming pool General 2006 District Fail ? Shall bonds of the Berwyn Park District, Cook County, to the amount of not to exceed $790,000 be issued for building, maintaining, improving and protecting the existing land and facilities of the General 2006 Berwyn Park District Pass District? Shall Waterloo Park District, in the City of Waterloo, Monroe County, acquire, improve, construct and install aquatics facilities, including land, and issue bonds to the amount of $4,500,000 for Waterloo Park the purpose of paying the costs General 2006 District Fail thereof? Shall bonds of the LeRoy Community Park District, McLean County, Illinois, to the amount of $2,000,000 be issued for the purpose of demolishing and replacing the existing pool, renovation, Leroy Community refurbishing, and improving the sites General Primary 2006 Park District Fail thereof? Shall Waterloo Park District, in the City of Waterloo, Monroe County, Illinois, install aquatic facilities, including land and related facilities and issue its bonds Waterloo Park to the amount of $4,500,000 for the General Primary, 2006 District Fail purpose of paying the costs thereof? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall bonds of the Park Ridge Recreation and Park District, Cook County, Illinois, to the amount of $24,600,000 be issued for the purpose of replacing the Oakton Park pools, ice Park Ridge Park arena and expanding the facilities at General Primary 2006 District Fail the Park Ridge Senior Center? Shall bonds of the South Barrington Park District, Cook County, Illinois, to the amount of $1,400,000 be issued solely for building and improving new South Barrington community parks in The Woods of General Primary 2006 Park District Fail South Barrington development? Shall bonds of the Lemont Park District, Cook, DuPage and Will Counties, Illinois, to the amount of $13,000,000 be issued for building, maintaining, improving existing buildings, and constructing/equipping of an aquatic, General Primary 2006 Lemont Park District Fail wellness and community centers? Shall bonds of the Roselle Park District, DuPage County, Illinois, to the amount of $1,800,000 be issued for the purpose General Primary 2006 Roselle Park District Pass of funding swimming pool construction? Proposition to issue $1,250,000 Park Bonds for the purpose of building, maintaining, improving & protecting the District's park system, including Harvester Park, Park Center Park, Burr Ridge Park Whittaker Park, Stevens Park, Palisades Consolidated 2005 District Pass Park, Garywood Park & Woods Pool... Proposition to issue $29,000,000 Park Bonds for the purpose of providing the revenue source to refinance outstanding alternate bonds of said Wheaton Park Park District issued for the payment of Consolidated 2005 District Pass land and park facillities. Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Proposition to issue bonds in the amount of $75,000,000 to acquire & preserve forests & natural lands, protect wild life habitats, enhance flood control, improve hiking & biking trails & Kane County Forest fishing, provide forest & wildlife Consolidated 2005 Preserve Pass education programs & improve... Proposition to issue $95,000,000 General Obligation Bonds to improve forests & other natural lands, preserving wildlife habitats, protecting natural resources, improving flood Will County Forest control, providing ed programs & Consolidated 2005 Preserve Pass increasing access to trails, fishing... Proposition to issue bonds in the amount of $6,900,000 for the purpose of acquiring & improving the land & building located at 536 East Avenue... (formerly the Burke Beverage Building), LaGrange Park to provide additional facilities for park & Consolidated 2005 District Pass recreational purposes. Shall the Township of Lyons be authorized to issue park bonds to the amount of $10,000,000 (10 million dollars) for the purpose of procuring and improving one or more small Consolidated 2005 Lyons Township Fail parks? Shall the district refinance its outstanding General Obligation Refunding Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source - Golf Course Project), series New Lenox 1995 and issue its bonds to the amount Community Park of $6,4000.000 for the purposes of General 2004 District Pass saving and paying the costs thereof? Proposition to issue park bonds to the amount of $10,000,000 for the purpose of procuring and improving one or more General 20041 Lyons Township Pass small parks? Proposition to issue general obligation bonds in an amount sufficient to pay for the renovation of the building located at 809 West Madison Street, Maywood, Maywood Park Illinois for park and recreation General 2004 District Pass purposes. Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Proposition to issue bonds in the amount of $16,640,000 for the purpose of paying the cost of improving the General Primary 2004 City of Palos Heights Fail recreational facilities of the city. Shall bonds in the amount of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000 be issued for the purpose of repairing the Charleston Swimming Pool facility and providing related site improvements, bearing interest at the General Primary 2004 City of Charleston Pass rate of not to exceed 5.95%? Proposition to issue $4,000,000 General Obligation Park Bonds for the purpose Grayslake of acquiring land, building, maintaining, Community Park improving and protecting land and General Primary 2004 District Pass facilities of the park district. Shall Stookey Township be authorzed to issued park bonds to the amount of five million dollars ($5,000,000) for the purpose of procuring and improving one General Primary 2004 Stookey Township Pass or more small parks? Proposition to issue $2,140,000 bonds for the purpose of building and equipping a new swimming pool facility, Tremont Area Park demolishing the existing swimming pool General Primary 2004 District Fail facility and improving the site. Bolingbrook Park Proposition to issue $15,000,000 Park General Primary 2004 District Pass Bonds Proposition to issue bonds to the amount of $13,950,000 for the purpose of replacing the Flick Park Pool and the Roosevelt Park Pool with a newly- Glenview Park constructed pool complex at each General Primary 2004 District Pass location within the Park District. Proposition to issue bonds in the amount of $650,000 for the purpose of purchasing property for parks, for the building, maintaining, improving & protection of Park Dist facilities, & for general expenses of present & future General Primary, 2004 Harvey Park District Pass park & recreation projects. Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Proposition to issue bonds in the amount of $9,950,000 for the purpose of paying cost of demolishing most of the Rainbow Falls water park and construction a new water park, bathhouse with 2nd floor community Elk Grove Park center space and outdoor inline hockey General Primary 2004 District Pass rink. Consolidated 2003 Berwyn Park District Fail Bond issue $3,500,000. Proposition to issue $5,700,000 in bonds for acquiring the Pinecrest Golf Course and the payment of the Consolidated 20031 Huntley Park District Pass expenses. Marengo Park Proposition to issue $1,955,000 Park Consolidated 2003 District Fail Bonds. Proposition to issue bonds in the amount of $2,095,000 for the purpose of building and equipping a new swimming pool facility, demolishing the Tremont Area Park existing swimming pool facility and Consolidated 2003 District Fail improving the site. Proposition to issue $7,750,000 General Obligation Park Bonds for the purpose New Lenox of acquiring land, bulding, maintaining, Community Park improving and protecting land and Consolidated 2003 District Fail facilities of park district. Proposition to issue $7,750,000 General Obligation Park Bonds for the purpose of acquiring land, bulding, maintaining, Plainfield Township improving and protecting land and Consolidated 2003 Park District Fail facilities of park district. ...issue bonds ($2,200,000.00) for the purposes of removing & replacing the existing pool, construction & equipping a new pool, & improving, expanding & Kingsbury Park equipping the bathhouse & pool General 2002 District Fail concession facilities of said Park Dist? Proposition to issue $7,800,000 General Obligation Park Bonds for the purpose of reconstructing the Sea Lion Aquatic General 2002 Lisle Park District Pass Park. General 2002 Berwyn Park District Fail Bond issue - $3,000,000? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Proposition to issue $2,800,000 Park Bonds for the purpose of constructing a new swimming pool facility and a new recreation center at Big Creek Park, and General 2002 Canton Park District Pass providing related site improvements? Public Question of the issuance of $6,000,000 of general obligation bonds for implementing the Comprehensive Plan Amendment-Route 60 Subarea General 2002 City of Lake Forest Pass (dated 6/4/01)... Proposition to issue bonds in the amount of $1,920,125 for the purpose of constructing a new Veterans Memorial Swimming Pool facility on the site of the old Veterans Memorial swimming Pool on Custer Avenue in General 2002 Dixon Park District Fail Dixon, Illinois. Proposition to issue bonds ($7,250,000) for the purpose of acquiring land for and continuing the construction of the Plainfield Township DuPage River bicycle trail and General 2002 Park District Fail connecting bicycle trails.. Shall bonds...amount of $2,400,000 be issued for the purposes of removing & replacing existing pool, constructing & equipping new pool, & improving, expanding & equipping the bathhouse & Kingsbury Park concession facilities...& for the payment General Primary 2002 District Fail of the expenses... Shall bonds($14,750,000) be issued for the purpose of constructing & equip. new Comm Center, renovating the existing pool & building (Johnson Recreation Center), const. new Bloomingdale Park maintenance facility & purchasing land General Primary 2002 District Fail .. Issue bonds in the amount of $33,000,000 for the purpose to build and equip new community center along Fox Valley Park with improving existing buildings and General Primary, 2002 District Pass parks. Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question ...issue bonds ($11,500,000) for the purpose of purchasing the Jewel-Tea Property, demolition expenses & performing environmental remediation thereon, all for improving the same for Barrington Park park purposes, & for the payment of General Primary 2002 District Pass expenses incident thereto? LaGrange Park General Primary 2002 District Fail Bond Issue - $9,300,000? Wilmette Park General Primary 2002 District Pass Bond issue - $25,000,00? Frankfort Square Proposition to issue $5,001,396 park General Primary 2002 Park District Pass bonds. Winnetka Park Consolidated 2001 District Fail Recreational facility Winnetka Park Consolidated 2001 District Fail Swimming pool facility Consolidated 2001 City of Effingham Fail Construct or acquire public golf course Consolidated 2001 Dundee Park District Fail Recreational facility Wauconda Park Consolidated 2001 District Fail Aquatic center/facility Grayslake Community Park Consolidated 2001 District Fail Recreational facility Wilmette Park General 2000 District Pass Swimming pool facility Arlington Heights General 2000 Park District Pass Swimming pool facility General 2000 City of Clinton Fail Swimming pool facility Hamilton Park General 2000 District Pass Swimming pool facility Wauconda Park General 2000 District Fail Aquatic center/facility General Primary 2000 City of Woodstock Pass Aquatic/volleyball McClean Community General Primary 2000 Unit School Pass Swimming pool facility Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Chicago Ridge Park General Primary 2000 District Fail Swimming pool facility General Primary 2000 Glencoe Park District Pass Center/ice rink question General Primary 2000 Huntley Park District Pass Swimming pool facility Tax Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the debt service extension base under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Worth Park District, Cook County, Illinois, for payment of principal and interest on limited bonds be increased from $48,311.61 to $130,000.00 for the 2012 levy year and all subsequent levy years, such debt service extension base to be increased each year by the lesser of 5% or the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index during the 12- month calendar year preceding the levy General Primary 2012 Worth Park District Fail year? Shall the limiting rate under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Channahon Park District, Will and Grundy Counties, Illinois, be increased by an additional amount equal to 0.0537% above the limiting rate for levy year 2009 for park purposes and be equal to 0.2098% of the equalized assessed value of the Channahon Park taxable property therein for levy year Consolidated 2011 District Pass 2011? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the limiting rate under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Urbana Park District, Champaign County, Illinois, be increased by an additional amount equal to .11% above the limiting rate for park purposes for levy year 2009 and be equal to .7878% of the equalized assessed value of the taxable property therein for levy year Consolidated 2011 Urbana Park District Pass 2011? Shall the limiting rate under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Lan- Oak Park District, Cook County, Illinois, be increased by an additional amount equal to .100% above the limiting rate for park purposes for levy year 2009 and be equal to .288% of the equalized assessed value of the taxable property therein for levy year 2010?"" (1) The approximate amount of taxes extendable at the most recently extended limiting rate is $1,062,384, and the approximate amount of taxes extendable if the proposition is approved is $1,627,482. (2) For the 2010 levy year the approximate amount of the additional tax extendable against property containing a single family residence and having a fair market value at the time of the referendum of $100,000 is estimated to be $10. (3) If the proposition is approved, the aggregate extension for 2010 will be determined by the limiting rate set forth in the proposition, rather than the otherwise applicable limiting rate calculated under the provisions of the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (commonly known as the Property Tax Cap Consolidated 2011 Lan Oak Park District Fail Law). Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the limiting rate under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Olympia Fields Park District, Cook County, Illinois, be increased by an additional amount equal to 0.136% above the limiting rate for levy year 2009 for the purpose of building, equipping and operating an athletic complex at Bicentennial Park and maintaining, improving and protecting parks and be equal to 0.395% of the equalized assessed value of the taxable property therein for levy year 2010?"" (1) The approximate amount of taxes extendable at the most recently extended limiting rate is $572,443.16, and the approximate amount of taxes extendable if the proposition is approved is $873,031.08. (2) For the 2010 levy year the approximate amount of the additional tax extendable against property containing a single family residence and having a fair market value at the time of the referendum of$100,000 is estimated to be $13.60. (3) If the proposition is approved, the aggregate extension for 2010 will be determined by the limiting rate set forth in the proposition, rather than the otherwise applicable limiting rate calculated under the provisions of the Property Tax Extension Olympia Field Park Limitation Law (commonly known as the Consolidated 2011 District Fail Property Tax Cap Law). Shall the Milledgeville Unit Park District be authorized to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed .25% for Milledgeville Unit all corporate purposes as provided in General Primary 2010 Park District Pass Section 5-3 of "The Park District Code"? Shall the Milledgeville Unit Park District be authorized and empowered to levy and collect a tax of .09375% for the purpose of recreational programs as Milledgeville Unit provided in Section 5-2 of "The Park General Primary, 2010 Park District Pass District Code"? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the limiting rate under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Park District of Forest Park, Cook County, Illinois, be increased by an additional amount equal to 0.120% above the limiting rate for park purposes for levy year 2008 and be equal to 0.521% of the equalized Park District of assessed value of the taxable property General Primary 2010 Forest Park Pass therein for levy year 2009? Shall the limiting rate under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Hampshire Park District, Kane County, Illinois, be increased by an additional amount equal to 0.0500% above the limiting rate for park purposes for levy year 2008 and be equal to 0.1397% of the equalized Hampshire Park assessed value of the taxable property General Primary, 2010 District Fail therein for levy year 2009? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the limiting rate under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Lan-Oak Park District, Cook County, Illinois, be increased by an additional amount equal to .100% above the limiting rate for levy year 2007 and be equal to .292% of the equalized assessed value of the taxable property therein for levy year 2009?" (1) The approximate amount of taxes extendable at the most recently extended limiting rate is $902,335, and the approximate amount of taxes extendable if the proposition is approved is $1,327,302. (2) For the 2009 levy year the approximate amount of the additional tax extendable against property containing a single family residence and having a fair market value at the time of the referendum of $100,000 is estimated to be $10. (3) If the proposition is approved, the aggregate extension for 2009 will be determined by the limiting rate set forth in the proposition, rather than the otherwise applicable limiting rate calculated under the provisions of the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (commonly known as the Property Consolidated 2009 Lan Oak Park District Fail Tax Cap Law). Shall the limiting rate under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Park District of Highland Park, Lake County, Illinois, be increased by an additional amount equal to 0.20% above the limiting rate for levy year 2007 and be equal to 0.4980% of the Park District of equalized assessed value of the taxable General 2008 Highland Park Fail property therein for levy year 2008? Shall the Hazel Crest Park District be authorized to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed 0.15% for the purpose of recreational programs including the operation of a swimming pool and aquatic center as Hazel Crest Park provided in Section 5-3a of The Park General 2008 District Fail District Code? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the limiting rate under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Lan-Oak Park District, Cook County, Illinois, be increased by an additional amount equal to .100% above the limiting rate for levy year 2006 and be equal to .296% of the equalized assessed value of the taxable General 2008 Lan Oak Park District Fail property therein for levy year 2008? Shall the Litchfield Park District be authorized to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed .25% for Litchfield Park all corporate purposes as provided in General Primary 2008 District Fail section 5-3 of the Park District Code? Shall the maximum allowable general corporate tax rate for the Carthage Park District of Hancock County be increased from .10% to .25% of the value of all Carthage Park taxable property within the Park General Primary 2008 District Fail District? Shall the limiting rate for the Urbana Park District, Champaign County, be increased 0.25% above the limiting rate for levy year 2006 and 0.7783% of the equalized assessed value of taxable General Primary 2008 Urbana Park District Fail property therein for levy year 2007? Shall the Williamson County Fair Board be allowed a tax not to exceed .03% of all taxable property in Williamson County for the purpose of preserving General Primary 2008 Williamson COUnty Fail our 150 year old County Fair Heritage? Shall the Lacon Park District be authorized to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed .25% for all corporate purposes as provided in Consolidated 2007 Lacon Park District Pass Section 5-3 of "The Park District Code"? Shall the Williamson County Fair Board be allowed a tax (not to exceed .05%) of the value as assessed by the Department of Revenue, of all taxable property in Williamson County for the purpose of preserving our 150 year old Consolidated 2007 Williamson County Fail County Fair Heritage? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall Dixon Park District increase real estate property taxes to repair and Consolidated 2007 Dixon Park District Fail operate Veterans Memorial Pool? Shall Nokomis Community Memorial Park District be authorized to levy and Nokomis County collect an additional tax of not to General 2006 Memorial Park Pass exceed .25%? Shall the extension limitation under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for Godley Park District, Will and Grundy Counties, be increased from the General 2006 Godley Park District Fail lesser of 5%? Shall the Westmont Park District be authorized to levy and collect an additional tax not to exceed .25% for corporate purposes, including the cost Westmont Park of constructing and operating a General 2006 District Fail swimming pool? Shall the limiting rate under the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law for the Plainfield Township Park District, Will and Kendall Counties, be increased Plainfield Township by an additional amount equal to General 2006 Park District Fail .05%? Shall Mt. Hope-Funks Grove Park District be authorized to levy and Mt. Hope Funks collect an additional tax not to exceed General 2006 Grove Park District Pass .25% for all corporate purposes? Shall Chicago Ridge Park District, Cook County, Illinois be authorized to levy and collect an additional tax not to exceed 0.15% for the purpose of recreational programs, as provided in Chicago Ridge Park Section 5-3A of "The Park District General Primary 2006 District Pass Code?" Proposition to levy an additional tax of .14% for the purpose of recreational programs, as provided in Section 5-3a Consolidated 2005 Paxton Park District Fail of "The Park District Code". Shall the Johnson County Board of Commissioner be authorized to spend money from the county tax revenue (general fund) or match government grants using money from the general fund to build and or maintain a sports Consolidated 2005 Johnson County Fail complex? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the Carlinville Park District be authorized to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed .25% for all corporate purposes as provided in Carlinville Park Section 5-3 of the "The Park District Consolidated 2005 District Fail Code"? Proposition to levy and collect an additional tax not to exceed 0.25% for all corporate purposes including safety & regulatory improvements & renewal of playgrounds, parks, facilities , & Oak Park Park recreation programs as provided in Consolidated 2005 District Pass Section 5-3 of the Pk Dist Code. Proposition to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed 0.25% for all corporate purposes including safety and regulatory improvements and renewal of playgrounds, parks, Park District of Oak facilities, & recreation programs as Consolidated 2005 Park Pass provided in Section 5-3 Pk Dist Code. Shall the county join the Metro-East Park & Recreation Dist & impose a Retailers' occupation tax at a rate on one-tenth of 1%...with 50% of the Metro East Park and Revenue going to dist and 50% Consolidated 2005 Recreation Fail returned to the county. Should the City of Warrenville, using TIF (Tax Increment Finance) revenues, fund a Recreation Center on Warren Avenue for the Warrenville Park General 2004 City of Warrenville Pass District? Shall the Hampshire Park Dist be authorized & empowered to levy & collect a tax of .12% (12 cents per $100.00 of assessed valuation which includes the District's existing tax for Hampshire Park recreational programs) for the purpose General 2004 District Fail of recreational programs? Shall the maximum tax rate for the park maintenance fund of New Douglas Township be established at .12% on the equalized assessed value instead of .02%, the maximum rate otherwise New Douglas applicable to the next taxes to be General 2004 Township Pass extended? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Proposition to increase the rate of taxation on all taxable property in the district for corporate purposes by an amount sufficient to pay for the renovation of the building located at Maywood Park 809 West Madison street, Maywood, for General 2004 District Fail park & recreation purposes. Proposition to increase the rate of taxation on all taxable property in the district for corporate purposes by an amount sufficient to pay for the renovation of the parking lot located at Maywood Park 809 West Madison Street, Maywood for General 2004 District Fail park and recreation purposes. Proposition to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed .25% for all corporate purposes, specifically to acquire approximately 32 acres of the Our lady of Sorrows Convent property, Oak Forest Park to develop athletic fields and build a General 2004 District Fail recreation facility... Proposition to levy and collect an additional tax of .10% for the purpose Clarendon Hills Park of recreational programs as provided in General Primary 2004 District Pass Section 5.3a of "The Park Dist Code". Proposition to levy and collect a tax of Hampshire Park .12% for the purpose of recreational General Primary 2004 District Fail programs. Proposition to levy a .20% annual recreation system tax for the purpose of establishing and maintaining a General Primary 2004 Village of Seneca Pass recreation system in the Village. Proposition to increase the maximum tax rate for the park maintenance fund be established at .12% on the equalized assessed value instead of General Primary 2004 Alhambra Township Fail .02%, the present maximum rate. Proposition to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed .25% for Nokomis Community all corporate purposes as provided in General Primary 2004 Memorial Park Fail Section 5-3 of the Park District code. Consolidated 2003 Thorton Township Pass Levy annual tax rate for youth services. Consolidated 2003 Clyde Park District Pass Tax rate increase for police programs? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Collect additional tax for recreational Consolidated 2003 Justice Park District Fail purpose? Mt Prospect Park Collect additional tax for recreational Consolidated 2003 District Fail purpose? Proposition to levy and collect an Bloomingdale Park additional tax not to exceed .055% for Consolidated 2003 District Fail all corporate purposes. Proposition to levy an additional tax not Carol Stream Park to exceed .15% for all corporate Consolidated 2003 District Fail purposes. Shall the present authority of the Golfview Hills Park Dist to levy and collect a tax of not to exceed 0.10% for all corporate purposes...be reduced to Golfview Hills Park levy and collect a tax of not to exceed Consolidated 2003 District Pass 0.001% for all corporate purposes. Shall the authority to levy and collect a tax of not to exceed 0.075% , be reduced to levy and collect a tax not to Golfview Hills Park exceed 0.001% for the purposes of Consolidated 2003 District Pass recreational programs . Proposition to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed 0.09% for all corporate purposes, maintenance, playground replacement Consolidated 2003 Roselle Park District Pass and operating expenses of the Dist. Proposition to levy an additional tax of Warrenville Park not to exceed .12% for all corporate Consolidated 2003 District Pass purposes. Under the property tax extension limitation law may an aggregate extension not to exceed $77,280.00 be made for the purposes of Hanover Township Park Dist for the 2003 levy Consolidated 2003 Hanover Township Pass year? Propostion to authorize the levy and collection of an additional corporate tax Frankfort Park not to exceed .10% for all corporate Consolidated 2003 District Fail purposes. Proposition to levy and collect an Rockford Park additional tax of .225% for the purpose Consolidated 2003 District Fail lof recreational programs. Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Propositon to authorize a levy for an Hazel Crest Park additional tax not to exceed .25% for Consolidated 2003 District Fail the purpose of recreational programs. Shall the authorized aggregate principal indebtedness...be increased to not Kingsbury Park more than 5.75 % of the value of the General 2002 District Fail taxable property therein? Assent to a maximum annual property tax to establish, expand, maintain and conduct a supervised playground and recreation system of .20 % of full, fair cash value, as equalized or assessed by the Dept of Revenue...of all taxable General 2002 City of Trenton Fail property...? Shall the Roselle Park District be authorized to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed 0.175% for all corporate purposes, including construction of a pool facility and general equipment replacement and General 2002 Roselle Park District Fail operating expenses of the District? Warrenville Park Proposition to levy an additional tax for General 2002 District Fail recreational programs. Chicago Ridge Park Collect additional tax for recreational General 2002 District Fail programs? Hazel Crest Park Collect additional tax for recreational General 2002 District Fail purposes? Collect additional tax for recreational General 2002 Justice Park District Fail purposes? Markham Park Maximum tax rate for recreational General 2002 District Fail programs? Proposition to increase the existing tax rate at .051% for general purposes, including education, outdoor recreation, maintenance, operations, public safety Lake County Forest at the forest preserves, trails and other General 2002 Preserve District Pass properties of the district... Frankfort Park Proposition to levy and collect General 2002 District Fail additional tax for corporate purposes. Plainfield Township Proposition to levy an additional tax not General 1 20021 Park District IFail Ito exceed .05% for corporate purposes. Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Proposition to increase and establish the maximum tax rate for the fund to purchase, establish & maintain public parks, at .160% on the equalized assessed value instead of .075%, the maximum rate other- wise applicable to General 2002 City of East Moline Fail the next taxes to be extended. Shall the authorized aggregate principal indebtedness...be increased to not Kingsbury Park more than 5.75 per centum of the value General Primary 2002 District Fail of the taxable property therein? ...annual tax of not less than .0001% & not more than .09% on all taxable property ...be levied, in addition to taxes for general purposes ...to establish, maintain, & conduct a supervised recreation system in the General Primary 2002 Village of Owaneco Pass village. ...assent to a maximum property tax to establish, expand, maintain & conduct a supervised playground & recreation system of .20% of full, fair cash value, as equalized or assessed by Dept of General Primary 2002 City of Trenton Fail Revenue... Shall the Burr Ridge Park District be authorized to levy and collect an additional tax of .15% for the purpose of recreational programs, as provided in Burr Ridge Park Section 5-3a of "The Park District General Primary 2002 District Fail Code"? Shall the Darien Park District, DuPage County, Illinois, be authorized to levy and collect an additional tax of not to exceed .07% for all corporate purposes as provided in Section 5-3 of "the Park General Primary 2002 Darien Park District Fail District Code"? Increase aggregate principal indebtedness from 4.00 per centum of Barrington Park the value of the taxable property General Primary 2002 District Pass therein? Proposition to levy additional tax for General Primary 20021 Huntley Park District Fail retirement fund, additional tax of .03%. Hazel Crest Park Tax rate increase for recreational General Primary 2002 District Fail purposes? Tax rate increase for recreational General Primary, 2002 Justice Park District Fail purposes? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question LaGrange Park General Primary 2002 District Fail Tax rate increase? Markham Park Tax rate increase for recreational General Primary 2002 District Fail purposes? Rosemont Park Tax rate increase for corporate General Primary 2002 District Pass purposes? roposi ion o—auttiorize trie levy an Frankfort Park collection of an additional Corporate General Primary 20021 District Fail Tax. Manhattan Park Proposition to levy an additional tax for General Primary 2002 District Pass Corporate Purposes. Shall the maximum allowable tax rate for the District be increased to .40% of the value of all taxable property within Cissna Park Fire the District as equalized or assessed by General Primary 2002 Protection District Pass the Department of Revenue? Proposition to increase debt limitation Hamilton Park to not more than 5.75% of the value of General Primary 2002 District Pass the taxable property. Consolidated 2001 Village of Riverside Fail Recreational programs Consolidated 2001 Justice Park District Fail Recreational programs Consolidated 2001 Tri Twp Park District Fail Recreational programs Crystal Lake Park Consolidated 2001 District Fail Recreational programs Buffalo Grove Park Consolidated 2001 District Fail Recreational programs Burr Ridge Park Consolidated 2001 District Fail Recreational programs General 2000 Nixon Township Pass Park question Buffalo Grove Park General Primary 2000 District Fail Recreational programs Barrington Park General Primary 2000 District Pass Recreational programs General Primary 2000 Village of South Elgin Fail Recreational facility Little Mackinaw Park General Primary 1 20001 District IFail I Park question Miscellaneous Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Village of Ford SHALL THE FORD HEIGHTS PARK General Primary 2012 Heights Pass DISTRICT BE ESTABLISHED? PROPOSITION FOR THE ORGANIZATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DUNLAP General Primary 2012 Dunlap Park District Fail PARK DISTRICT. Cordova Township Consolidated 2011 Park District Pass For/Against Park District Shall the City of Chicago develop a public park on the site of the former Edgewater Medical Center, located in Consolidated the 5700 block of north Ashland Primary 2011 Chicago Ward 40 Pass Avenue? Shall the Franklin Township Park Franklin Township District reorganize as a general park General 2010 Park District Pass district under the park district code? Proposition for Organization and Establishment of Cordova Township Cordova Township Park District to be know as "Cordova General 2010 Park District Pass Township Park District" "Shall the Village of Riverside retain its General 2010 Village of Riverside Pass Parks and Recreation Board?" "Shall a new Park District, called the Edinburg Park District, compromising Edinburg Park the following described territory, be General Primary 2010 District Pass formed?" "Shall the proposed Coaler Springs Park District be organized and established as a General Park District under the provisions of the Park District Code in Coaler Springs Park the Territory described as follows ... General Primary 2010 District Fail For/Against Park District?" Mason Township Question to establish Mason Township Consolidated 2009 Park District Pass Park District Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Do you want the Rend Lake Conservancy District to enter into long- term leases for the private development of public recreation and commercial facilities (such as marinas, restaurants, shops, water park, walking trails, parks, fishing piers, amusement, or entertainment amenities) and short- term/long term leasing facilities (such as cabins, cottages, hotels, Rend Lake condominiums, or campgrounds) on the General 2008 Conservancy District Pass unused property in the Gun Creek area? Shall the Cary Park District sell the following real estate: up to 87 acres of the westernmost portion of Hoffman Park or any subpart thereof, lying within the East half of Section 15, Township 43 North, Range 8 East of the Third Principal Meridian in McHenry County, Illinois, and bounded on the east by the eastern boundary line of Section 15 and on the west by Illinois General 2008 Cary Park District Pass State Route 31? Shall the legal voters residing in Hanna City, Peoria County, State of Illinois, Hannah City Park organize and form a new park district General 2008 District Pass known as the Hanna City Park District? Shall the Berwyn Park District annex all of the territory within the Village of General 2008 Village of Wheeling Fail Stickney for park purposes? A proposition for or against the organization and establishment of a Erie Area Park general park district to be known as General 2008 District Fail Erie Area Park District. Shall a new park district, called the Blue mound Park District, compromising the territory of Blue Blue Mound Park Mound Village, Macon County, Illinois, General 2008 District Pass be formed? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Do you want Rend Lake Conservancy District to enter into long-term leases for the private development of public recreation and commercial facilities (such as marinas, restaurants, shops, water park, walking trails, parks, fishing piers, amusement, or entertainment amenities) and short- term/long term leasing facilities (such as cabins, cottages, hotels, Rend Lake condominiums, or campgrounds) on the General 2008 Conservancy District Pass unused property in the Gun Creek area? Shall the Village of Campton Hills collect impact fees on new Village of Campton developments to be used for parks in General Primary 2008 Hills Pass addition to other impact fees? Should the Hazel Crest Park District Hazel Crest Park merge with the Village of Hazel Crest General Primary 2008 District Pass Government? Should the Hazel Crest Park District reopen the Crestview swimming pool Hazel Crest Park located at 17001 Holmes, Hazel Crest, General Primary 2008 District Pass Illinois? Shall the Hazel Crest Park District lease for $1.00 per year the Crestview swimming pool to the Village of Hazel Hazel Crest Park Crest so that the Village can reopen the General Primary 2008 District Pass swimming pool? Should a park district be formed in Mt Carroll Park Carroll County, Illinois, to be known as Consolidated 2007 District Fail the Mt. Carroll Park District? A proposition to sell real property located in Hoffman Park, 80 acres of the westernmost portion or any subpart Consolidated 2007 Cary Park District Fail thereof. Shall the Alderman of the 35th Ward use the eminent domain process he has started at the site of the Mega Mall for the public purpose of developing a park as opposed to benefiting a private General 2006 Chicago Ward 35 Pass development? Shall the Maywood Park District annex all property located in the corporate Maywood Park limits of the Village of Maywood that is General 2006 District Pass not a part of any park district? Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Proposition to demolish the Oakton Park swimming pool facilities and construct a new 46,600 sq ft indoor recreation center containing a 31,880 Park Ridge sq ft field house...at a cost of $11.5 Recreation and Park million, as part of the overall Oakton Consolidated 2005 District Fail Sports Complex renovation. Shall the Lan Oak Park Dist renovate and improve the District's existing aquatic facility located at Bock Park at a Consolidated 2005 Lan Oak Park District Fail cost not exceed $3,500,000.00? Shall the three vacant lots at the southeast corner of Emerson and Central, across from the library and commonly known as 'Central Park', be Village of Mt retained by the Village of Mount Consolidated 2005 Prospect Pass Prospect as a park? Proposition to demolish the Oakton Park swimming pool facilities and construct a new 41,000 sq ft outdoor Park Ridge aquatic park in their place at a cost of Recreation and Park $13.0 million, as part of the overall Consolidated 2005 District Fail Oakton Sports Complex renovation. Proposition to annex Midway Acres Subdivisions #'s 1,2,3, Kohnen's Subdivision #2 & 12 acres, due West of Kohnens #2 described as Future Development in the plat of survey for Germantown Park Kohnen's Subdivision, for park General 2004 District Fail purposes. Shall the Village of Manteno continue to operate the Manteno Golf Club if the Village Board must use the Village's general revenues to subsidize golf General 2004 Village of Manteno Fail course operations? Shall the Village of Lynwood attempt by referendum to establish a park district General 2004 Village of Lynwood Pass within the Village of Lynwood? Proposition for Organization and Aviston Community Establishment of a Park District to be General Primary 2004 Park District Pass known as Aviston Community Park Dist. Morris Area Proposition for Organization and Recreation and Park Establishment of the Morris Area General Primary 2004 District Fail Recreation and Park District. Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Mt Hope Township/ Proposition to organize a park district to Funks Grove encompass the political subdivisions of General Primary 2004 Township Pass Mt. Hope Twp and Funks Grove Twp. Proposition for the organization and establishment of Logan Township Park General Primary 2004 Logan Township Fail District. Shall the City fo Palos Heights plan for the construction of a new swimming General Primary 2004 City of Palos Heights Pass pool? Shall the City of Palos Heights plan for the construction of a new Receation General Primary 2004 City of Palos Heights Pass Center? Shall the Village construct an observatory learning center on Marion Street at the intersection of the Material Service Quarry for revenues General Primary 2004 Village of Thorton Fail other than real estate taxes? Shall a Park Dist to be named the Hanover Township Park Dist be established and organized with the same legal boundaries as Hanover Consolidated 2003 Hanover Township Pass Township. Sugar Grove Proposition to reorganize as a General Pleasure Driveway Park Dist. Consolidated 2003 and Park District Pass Proposition to organize a Forest Preserve District described as follows: The entire area of Stephenson County, Forest Preserve Illinois, with its borders to be District of coterminous with the borders of Consolidated 2003 Stephenson County Fail Stephenson County Illinois. Shall a park district to be named the "Rice Township Park District" be established and organized with the same legal boundaries as Rice General 2002 Rice Township Pass Township, Jo Davies County, Illinois?" Metamora Park General 2002 District Fail Proposition to dissolve park distict. Election Type Year Government Entity Pass/Fail Question Shall the Canton Park district be allowed to sell the following described real estate? A tract of land located in Sections Two & Eleven Twp six North, Range Four East of the Fourth Principal General Primary 2002 Canton Park District Pass Meridian... General 2000 Village of Gurnee Pass Aquatic center/facility Village of Lake in the General 2000 Hills Pass Recreational facility Metamora Park General 2000 District Fail Recreational programs Downers Grove Park General Primary 2000 District Fail Recreational facility Referendum Surveyed households were asked to indicate their level of support for a Parks and Recreation Department referendum. They were given seven levels of support per month, from less than$5 to more than $50. Households were also given a"would not be willing to incur an increase" option. All respondents who did not answer the question are included in percentage totals to provide the Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department with conservative estimates of referendum support. About 7% of households did not provide an answer to the referendum question. The following graph shows levels of support for a referendum. The categories are arranged in order of lowest to highest level of support and include those respondents who did not answer and those who do not support a referendum. Each bar shows the percentage of support for a given level of tax increase. These totals include those who support a referendum at that level and those who support the referendum at a greater level, since it could be assumed that households which would support a tax increase at a higher level would support it at a lower one as well. Almost three-quarters (74%) of respondents support a referendum at some level. About 55% of households would support a referendum of$5410. After this level, support drops off sharply, with only 23% supporting a referendum of$11-$20 and 10% supporting $21-$30. Nearly one in five households (19%) do not support a referendum at any level, and 7% chose not to answer. loo 90 80 74% 70 60 55 50 40 30 23% 20 10 10% 0 Less than$5 Between$5 and Between$11 and Between$21 and Between$31 and Between$41 and More than$50 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 Support for Referendum Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department 34 Public Opinion Laboratory 2007 Mail Survey Northern Illinois University The following chart presents the percent of support for each dollar category, as well as the cumulative percent information presented in the bar graph on the previous page. Level of referendum support per month Cumulative Level of Support Percent Percent Less than $5 19.0% 19.0% Between $5 and $10 32.0% 51.0% Between $11 and $20 12.8% 63.8% Between $21 and $30 5.8% 69.7% Between $31 and $40 .8% 70.4% Between $41 and $50 2.1% 72.5% More than $50 1.1% 73.6% Would not be willing 19.2% 92.8% to incur an increase No answer 7.2% 100.0% Total 100.0% Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department 35 Public Opinion Laboratory 2007 Mail Survey Northern Illinois University Certain groups within the Yorkville community are more likely to support a referendum than others. Those who have used park department facilities or programs in the past year are more likely to support a referendum at some level. Those who have attended communitywide programs and special events in the past year are also more likely than the general population to support a referendum. Additionally, those who have not taken part in a program other than the Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department programs are less likely to support a referendum than the general population. Possibly this is due to an overall low level of interest in programs offered by the department. Households with children are much more likely to support a referendum than are households without. Households with children age five and under are particularly likely to be in support of a referendum. Finally, households with members 55 and older are less likely to support a referendum than the general population; however, these are the households least likely to have children present. Households with members 18-35 years of age and with members 36-54 years of age are more likely to support a referendum and are also households most likely to have children under 18 present. Another demographic characteristic with an effect on likelihood of support for a referendum is yearly household income. Households with a yearly income of$50,000 or greater are more likely to support a referendum than are households with a yearly income of less than $50,000. No other demographic characteristic has an effect on referendum support. Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department 36 Public Opinion Laboratory 2007 Mail Survey Northern Illinois University Other Programs Households were asked about use of programs offered by groups or organizations other than the Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department. Half of all responding households indicate that they have not used any other program. Of those households reporting use of another program in the past year, 23% had used the Plano YMCA. Around one in ten households have used Club 47 (11%), the Oswegoland Park District (10%) and the Fox Valley Park District(9%). One in twenty-five households (4%) have used Anytime Fitness, and 2%use Cardinal Fitness. Seven percent of households report use of some other type of program, including Curves, Fox Valley Special Recreation, Rush Copley Fitness Center, and Oswego East swim lessons, as well as a variety of other programs. (Percents total more than 100%because respondents who have used other programs were allowed to select more than one program.) 60 50 504� 40 30 23% 20 10 7% I Oil- I 4% 2% 0 No other Plano YMCA Club 47 Oswegoland Fox Valley Other programs Anytime Cardinal programs Park District Park District Fitness Fitness Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department 28 Public Opinion Laboratory 2007 Mail Survey Northern Illinois University Additional Facilities Respondents were given a list of twenty-five additional facilities the Parks and Recreation Department might offer. They were asked to rate the importance of offering these additional facilities on a four-point scale from"very important"to "not important." Paved bike trails received the highest percentage of"very important"ratings, with 53% of households. Additionally, a number of households mentioned the need for bike paths in the last question of the survey, which asked respondents to share additional comments with the park department. (These comments may be found in Appendix A.) Both outdoor and indoor recreational pools were also considered important by the community, with 47% and 39% of households, respectively, considering these services to be very important. Pools were also mentioned several times in the last question of the survey. Just over 42% of those surveyed reported that a facility devoted to fitness and wellness was very important, while 36% said a Recreation Center with a gym and instructional rooms is very important. Slightly less than 35% of responding households report that acquiring more land for additional parks is very important. Three facilities are believed by over seven in ten households to be either"not too important" or"not important". These are a BMX track(79%), a disk golf course (78%), and an outdoor roller hockey rink (75%). 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Paved bike trails 53% 6% 10% Outdoor recreational pool 47% 17% Facility dedicated to fitness and wellness 42% 13% 11% Indoor recreational pool 39% !r. 16% Recreation Center with gym and instructional rooms 36% 36% % 13% Acquiring more land for additional parks 3s7 5% 19% 12% Mountain bike trails 27% 30 21% 22% Teen center 26%, 41 17/u 16% 18-hole public golf course 26'% 23% 28% Outdoor ice skating rink 0% 3s% 22% 19% 9-hole beginner golf course I9'i 29% 23% 28 Tennis courts 19% 34 30% 17% Auditorium and cultural arts center ls% 36% 24% 21% Indoor field house =1 7% 32% 27%1 1 24% Dog park n% 26% 25% 33% Indoor ice skating rink n% 28% 27% 28% Additional baseball and softball fields 6% 39% 26% 20% Outdoor amphitheatre s% G. 26% 122%1 1 Additional outdoor basketball courts % 33% 329/' 22% Additional soccer fields 11% 34% 32% 23% Cross country ski trails 9% 26% 34% 31% Disk golf course 9% 13% 34% 44% Skate park 7% 24% 31% 37% Outdoor roller hockey rink % 18% 38% 37% BMX track 6% 14% 29% 50% ■Very important ■Somewhat important O Not too important ❑Not important Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department 31 Public Opinion Laboratory 2007 Mail Survey Northern Illinois University 7.12.12 YMCA REC C R 2012 SUMMER CATALOG SUMMARY YMCA REC Center Resident Non-Resident Membership Monthly Draft Join Fee Basic Membership 1 Year 3 Months 1 Year 3 Months Join Fee (all) Youth $17.50 $30 1st Child $25 $33 $30 $40 $50* High School/College $20.50 $30 2nd Child $10 $3 $15 $20 Adult $36 $60 Each Add'I Child $5 $2 $7 $9 Family $57 $75 High School/College $30 $30 $35 $35 Senior $27 $60 Adult $40 $53 $48 $64 Adult (add'I) $30 $40 $35 $46 Senior $35 $35 $42 $56 Senior (add'I) $15 $15 $18 $24 Premier Membership 1 Year 3 Months 1 Year 3 Months Join Fee (all) 1st Child $25 $33 $30 $40 $50* 2nd Child $10 $13 $15 $20 Each Add'I Child $7 $6 $7 $9 High School/College $40 $40 $50 $50 Adult $50 $66 $58 $77 Adult (add'I) $35 $46 $46 $61 Senior $44 $44 $50 $66 Senior (add'I) $20 $20 $23 $30 Other Membership 1 Year 3 months 1 Year 3 months Track only $20 $26 $24 $32 Pool only $35 $46 $40 $53 Guest Passes 18 or older $8 $10 14-17 $8 $10 Under 13 $5 $8 Government/Corporate Membership Basic Membership (1-4 people) $40 Premier Membership (1-4 people) $50 Basic Membership (5-8 people) $35 Premier Membership (5-8 people) $44 *Subject to change per promtional offers. 1 YMCA Yorkville Parks and Recreation SPECIAL EVENTS SPECIAL EVENTS YMCA Olympics $200 per team Sweetness 5K & 8K run/walk private registration Tri-City Challenge unlisted Farmers' Market Free Rock the Nauk' 5K Run $20 $30 day of Music Night Free Summer Scamper 5K & 10K $20 $30 day of Music Night Free Graue Mill Day Trip $10 all ages Music Night Free Playground Picnic $5 all ages West Ribs on the River (Music night) Free Just Me & My Dad Pizza Night $10 3Y&up Illinois Whitewater Festival Free More on 34 garage sale $10/day $15 both days Movie Night Free Wet&Wild Luau $7 6Y-12Y Movie Night/National Night Out Free Pinkalicious Fun $7 3Y-6Y Hometown Days Free/$2 after 5pm Blackberry Farm &Splash Country $15 all ages West Summer Fun &Tie Dye $6 6Y-12Y Friends & Family Dodge Ball Tourn. $5 6Y&up West Olympic Activity Day $40 6Y-12Y Track& Field at Summerfest Free all ages Somonauk Park Back to School Fiesta $6 6Y-12Y Renaussance Fair Excursion $25 A/$15 C all ages West Cupcakes with Grandma $12 2Y-12Y Getting Crafty with Grandpa $12/couple $6 add'I child 2Y-12Y Family Camp Out free all ages ELC Summer BBQ free all ages SENIORS SENIORS Member Non-member Age Foxy Seniors $2 per meeting 60Y&up Walking Club $4 $5 Chicago Skyline Sail $45 60Y&up Knitting Club Free Free Bocce Ball Free Free Lincoln Park Zoo Trip 3rd St. Geneva Trip Senior Bowling League Yorkville Wii Open Bowling Schedule Beecher Bean Bag Baseball Beecher REC Center PM/BM/R/NR Silver Sneakers $0/27/54/72 Senior Fit $0/27/54/72 2 YMCA Yorkville Parks and Recreation CAMPS Fee - Member Fee Non-Member CAMPS Counselors in Training $82 $102 14Y Weekly Camps Leaders in Training $99 $117 12Y-13Y iCamp (varies) $75 $85 5 to 8 7 weeks, fee per week Camp of Champions $110 $130 SY-11Y 11 weeks, fee per wee Safety Town $75 $85 4 to S Preschool Summer Camps (varies) $55 $75 3Y-5Y 10 weeks, fee per wee Camp 911 $12 $15 1-4 grades Preschool Weekly Camps Summer Fun for Kidz (child 1) $7 per week $15 per week 4 and up 6 weeks, fee per week Cooking $45 $67 4Y-6Y Summer Fun for Kidz (child 2) $5 per week $12 per week 5 and up 6 weeks, fee per week Mini Mozart Music Camp $30 $45 3Y-5Y Summer Fun for Kidz (child 3) $3 per week $10 per week 6 and up 6 weeks, fee per week Young at Art Camp $30 $45 3Y-5Y Music and More Gymnastics Preschool Camp $100 $150 4Y-6Y Beginning Poms $72 $72 5 to 10 Arts& More Poms 1 $72 $72 5 to 10 Princess Ballet Camp $30 $45 3Y-5Y Beginning Tumbling/Acrobats $90 $90 6 to 10 Hip Hop Camp $35 $52 6Y-10Y Tot Rock $55 $60 12 to 24 mo Poms Camp $35 $52 6Y-10Y Kid Rock $55 $60 2 to 3 Kids Kitchen $45 $67 6Y-10Y Kindermusik Adventures $60 $65 0 to 6 Kids Rock Camp $35 $52 6Y-10Y Guitar 1 $140 $145 7 to 12 Create with Paint $35 $52 5Y-10Y Guitar II $140 $145 7 to 12 Creative Painting $90 $110 10&up Guitar Boot Camp $140 $145 13 to 18 Kids Art Mix Camp $35 $52 5Y-10Y Lights, Camera, Action - Batman $115 $120 7 to 11 Beads Galore Camp $40 $60 7Y-13Y Rock& Roll Robotics $115 $120 8 to 12 Center Stage Drama $35 $52 6Y-12Y Little Gardeners Camp $25 $30 3 to 5 Acting 101 $90 $110 12&up I Love Bugs! $25 $30 3 to 5 Camp "Glee" $90 $110 8Y-14Y Little Miss Manners $52 $57 1-5 grades The Shaw Reading Program $25 $45 4Y-5Y, 6Y-8Y Wild West $25 $30 3 to S Little Miss Manners $40 $40 7Y-10Y Gameapalooza $25 $30 3 to 5 Gymnastic Camp $150 $200 6Y&up Fun in the Sun! $25 $30 3 to 5 Under the Sea! $25 $30 3 to 5 Let's Speak Spanish! $85 $100 3 to S Let's Speak Spanish! $85 $100 6 to 8 Jr. Engineering $150 $155 1-3 grades Elementary Engineering $150 $155 4-8 grades Swing Kids Workshop $15 $20 7-12 grades Swing Kids! $60 $65 7-12 grades Let's Go Fishing! $35 $40 5+ 3 YMCA Yorkville Parks and Recreation UP Tykes Sports Camps Sports T-Ball Camp $30 $45 4Y-6Y All Star Tumble Time $60 $65 3 to 5 T-Ball League $60 $90 4Y-6Y Al Star Cheer Team $60 $65 3 to 5 Archery $30 $45 6Y&up All Star Action Series $60 $65 3 to 5 Bitty Basketball Camp $30 $45 4Y-6Y All Star Spirit Team $60 $65 6 to 8 Flag Football $30 $45 4Y-6Y All Star Parent/Tot $69 $74 2 to 3 Indoor Floor Hockey $30 $45 4Y-6Y All Star Super Sport $69 $74 2 to 3 Mighty Tykes Skills Camps Al Star Soccer $69 $74 3 to 4 All-American Baseball Skills Clinic $50 $75 6Y-12Y All Star Soccer $69 $74 3 to 4 All-American Basketball Camp $60 $90 3-8 Grade All Star Soccer $69 $74 3 to 4 British Soccer Camp All Star Soccer $69 $74 3 to 4 Half Day Player Development $143 $143 6Y-9Y All Star Soccer $60 $65 3 to 4 Mini Soccer $110 $110 4Y-6Y All Star Soccer $60 $65 4 to 6 First Kicks $95 $95 3Y-4Y All Star T-ball $69 $74 3 to 4 "Hustlers" Ball-Handling Camp $60 $90 3-8 Grade All Star T-ball $60 $65 3 to 4 "Nothing' But Net" Shooting Camp $60 $90 3-8 Grade All Star T-ball $69 $74 4 to 6 Lil' Spikers Volleyball $30 $45 7Y-12Y All Star T-ball $60 $65 4 to 6 All Star T-ball league $105 $110 3 to 4 All Star T-ball league $105 $110 4 to 6 All Star Soccer II $69 $74 5 to 7 All Star Soccer II $23 $25 5 to 7 All Star Golf $69 $74 5 to 7 All Star Golf $23 $25 5 to 7 Beginner Golf Camp $80 $80 5 to 9 6-4day sessions, per week rate Advanced Golf Camp $95 $95 10 to 14 6-4day sessions, per week rate Elite Golf Camp $110 $110 10 to 14 4-4day sessions, per week rate 4 YMCA(Sports comparison only,from previous page) Yorkville Parks and Recreation (sports comparison only,cont'd from previous page) Lil'Tykes Sports Camps Sports Tennis Camp $50 $55 1-3 grade Tennis Camp $50 $55 4-6 grade Tennis Camp $50 $55 7-9 grade Soccer Training Camp $149 1st child 4 to 17 Soccer Training Camp $135 2nd child 4 to 17 Soccer Training Camp $119 3rd child 4 to 17 2nd-3rd Volleyball Camp $30 $35 2-3 grade 4th-5th Volleyball Camp $40 $45 4-5 grade Jr. High Volleyball Camp $40 $45 6-8 grade High School Volleyball Camp $40 $45 9-12 grade Softball Hitting and Fielding $45 $50 6 to 8 Softball Pitching Camp $35 $40 6 to 12 2nd-3rd Basketball Dev. Camp $35 $40 2 to 3 4th-6th Basketball Dev. Camp $30 $35 4 to 6 Youth Basketball Open Gym $0 $0 10 to 15 Boys Basketball Dev. Camp $25 $30 7 to 12 3 weeks, per week Girls Basketball Dev. Camp $25 $30 7 to 12 3 week, per week White Sox Little Sluggers Camp $179 $179 5 to 6 White Sox Intermediate Cmp $199 $199 7 to 8 White Sox Advanced Camp $199 $199 9 to 11 1st/2nd Flag Football $55 $65 1-2 grades Fall Soccer League $75 $85 4 to 5 Fall Soccer League $75 $85 6 to 7 Fall Soccer League $75 $85 8 to 9 U12/U14 Fall Soccer League $90 $100 10 to 12 5 YMCA Yorkville Parks and Recreation ARTS& DANCE DANCE Creative Play $35 $52 2Y-4Y Two Much Fun $54 $54 2 Creative Movement 1 $35 $52 18M-2Y Creative Dance $54 $54 3 to 4 Creative Movement II $35 $52 2Y-3Y Creatvie Movement 111 $45 $67 4Y-5Y Creative Movement IV $45 $67 4Y-5Y Basic Ballet $45 $67 5Y-6Y Central/West Ballet 1 $65 $82 7Y-10Y Ballet it -Tu $72 $72 Ballet II $65 $97 8Y&up Ballet I -W $90 $90 Ballet III $75 $112 8Y&up Jazz 1 $55 $82 7Y-10Y Jazz II $55 $82 8Y&up Jazz/Hip Hop 1 $90 $90 7 to 10 Jazz III $55 $82 8Y&up Beginning Ballet&Tap $72 $72 5 to 6 Basic Tap and Jazz $45 $67 5Y-6Y Beginning Ballet/Jazz $72 $72 5 to 6 Tap 1 $45 $67 7Y-10Y Pre-Tap $54 $54 3 to 5 Tap II $45 $67 8Y&up Tappin'Tots $54 $54 5 to 6 Tap 111 $45 $67 8Y&up Tap 1 $72 $72 7 to 10 Basic Hip Hop $55 $82 5Y-6Y Lyrical 1 $72 $72 7 to 10 Hip Hop 1 $55 $82 7Y-10Y Boys Only Hip Hop $72 $72 5 to 7 Hip Hop II $55 $82 8Y&up Boys Only Hip Hop $72 $72 8 to 12 Teen Hip Hop $55 $82 13Y-17Y Teen Lyrical $90 $90 11 to 19 Kids Art Mix $45 $67 6Y-9Y Teen Hip Hop/Jazz $112.50 $112.50 11 to 19 Young at Art $45 $67 3Y-5Y West Teen Ballet $90 $90 11 to 19 Future Chefs Cooking $48 $72 7Y-10Y Pre-School Cooking $36 $54 4Y-5Y Music lessons $70 $110 5+ AQUATICS Fee Meet fee AQUATICS PM/BM/R/NR Lil Ripples $58 Aqua Aerobics (M -8 weeks) $0/24/48/64 2 classes to choose from per day White $111 $36 Aqua Aerobics (M -8 weeks) $0/27/54/72 2 classes to chose from per day Purple $168 $36 Aqua Aerobics (Tu -8 weeks) $0/24/48/64 2 classes to choose from per day Black $198 $36 Aqua Aerobics (Tu -8 weeks) $0/27/54/72 2 classes to chose from per day Pre Senior $198 $36 Aqua Aerobics (W- 8 weeks) $0/24/48/64 2 classes to choose from per day Senior $228 $36 Aqua Aerobics (W- 8 weeks) $0/27/54/72 2 classes to chose from per day * all participants must be YMCA member Aqua Aerobics (Th -8 weeks) $0/24/48/64 2 classes to choose from per day Swim Lessons Member Non-member Aqua Aerobics (Th -8 weeks) $0/27/54/72 2 classes to chose from per day Water babies/tot $34 $51 6mo-3yr Aqua Aerobics (F-8 weeks) $0/24/48/64 2 classes to choose from per day Level 1-3 $34 $51 19mo-3yr Aqua Aerobics (F-8 weeks) $0/27/54/72 2 classes to chose from per day Level 4-6 $42 $63 Aqua Aerobics (Sa -8 weeks) $0/24/48/64 Private lessons- 1/2 hour $20 $30 Aqua Aerobics (Sa -8 weeks) $0/27/54/72 Private lessons- 1 hour $40 $60 Swim Lessons Package of 6 half hour lessons $105 n/a Private lessons- 1/2 hour $20 CPR $25 $38 18&up Semi-private $15 per child per 1/2 hour Mem/R/NR Diaper Divers $42/54/60 0-3 Level 1 Swim Lessons $42/54/60 3.5+ Level 2 Swim Lessons $42/54/60 3.5+ Level 3 Swim Lessons $42/54/60 3.5+ Level 4-6 Swim Lessons $42/54/60 3.5+ 6 YMCA Yorkville Parks and Recreation CHILD CARE CHILD CARE Early Learning Center Weekly Monthly Kid'z Club $5 per visit Full time Infants $180 $745 Toddler $180 $745 Two's $170 $702 Three-Five's $165 $682 Kindergarten $134 $537 Part time 2 Days 3 Days Infants $128 $169 Toddler $119 $160 Two's $108 $151 Three-Five's $103 $147 Preschool Parker's Playtime Preschool Resident Non-resident 2.5-3.5 yr old $95 $143 Three year old preschool $110 $120 2 days *registration fee of$50 3-4 yr old $95 $143 2 days Four year old Pre-K $160 $175 3 days $140 $210 3 days Pre-K $140 $210 3 days $140 $210 3 days $182 $273 4 days $235 $470 5 days Father's Day Creative Fun $5 SAFE (Before and After School) $114 3 day AM *registration fee of$3 $129 3 day PM $192 5 day AM $212 5 day PM $174 3 day AM $292 5 day PM PERSONAL TRAINING PERSONAL TRAINING Certified trainer Non-certified trainer One hour individual sessions $40 Single Fitness Assessment $45 $36 $120 3 pack 6 Sessions $264 $212 $175 5 pack 12 sessions $510 $408 $264 8 pack 18 sessions $738 $590 $378 12 pack One hour partner sessions $30 Single Small Group Training Practices $125 5 pack 2 Client/pkg. of 6 $150 $120 $185 8 pack 3-4 Client/pkg. of 6 $120 $100 Fitness Evaluation $15 14Y&up 2 Clients/pkg. of 12 $276 $220 Youth Fitness $20 6Y-12Y 3-4 Client/pkg. of 12 $216 $175 Member Non-member Rocket Runners Run Club $50 $75 Zumba Kids $2 per class 6Y-12Y Central and West Kickin' Kids $2 per class Yoga Kids $2 per class Friday Field Days $5 per day 6Y-12Y Team Strength $40 12Y-15Y Central and West 7 YMCA Yorkville Parks and Recreation FITNESS Adult Fitness Adult Fitness PM/BM/R/NR YMCA Boot Camp $50 $75 14&up Central and West Zumba $0/24/28/64 Twighlight Boot Camp $50 $75 The Resolution $0/78/156/208 Group H.E.A.T. $38 $57 14&up Piloxing $0/27/54/72 Women on Weights $15 $22.50 Central and West Flow Yoga $0/24/48/64 How to Run Your First 5K $70 $105 Pilates $0/27/54/72 Psychedelic Sampler Free 12&up Central and West Group Training $0/27/54/72 Tai Chi $0/27/54/27 Indoor Cycle $0/54/108/144 Group Power(3 days/week) $0/78/156/208 Group Power(2 days/week) $0/51/102/136 Group Power(1 day/week) $0/27/54/72 Club Flex $0/54/108/144 Gymnastics Tumbling Tykes $90 $135 2-3Y Mighty Tykes $90 $135 Girls' Beginner 1 $90 $135 Girls' Beginner II $90 $135 Girls' Advanced $90 $135 Girls'Transitional $135 $202 Girls' Intensive $200 $300 Beginner $90 $135 Boys Tumbling $90 $135 Advanced Beginner $90 $135 Intermediate Cheerl $90 $135 Cheer2 $90 $135 Cheer3 $90 $135 Cheer4 $90 $135 Open Gym $8 $16 Late Night Open Gym $15 $30 6Y+ Gymnastics Clinics Star Spangled Flyers Camp $150 $200 6Y&up Preschool Camp $100 $150 4Y-6Y Adult Sports Adult Sports Men's Over 30 Basketball League $41 $61 30Y&up Fall Coed Softball League $700 $700 Adult Men's Noon Basketball Free 18&up Fall Men's Softball League $700 $700 Adult Men's Summer Flag Football $200 per team 18Y&up Adult Basketball Open Gym $0 $0 Adult Karate Volleyball Open Gym $3 $4 Adult Youth Karate- beginner $42 $63 6Y-12Y Youth Karate- advanced $42 $63 6Y-12Y Adult Karate - beginner $69 $103 12Y&up Adult Karate -advanced $69 $103 12Y&up Aikido $42 $63 13Y&up YMCA Basketball Academy $50 $75 3-8 grade 8 YMCA Yorkville Parks and Recreation RENTALS REC CENTER RENTAL Birthday Parties Sports Package $100 Pool Package $150 Bounce House Package $125 ROOM RENTAL Per hour Youth Gym $35 Bounce House (in Youth Gym) small - $40, large $75 Batting cage/Golf cage $55 Studio 1 & 2 $55 Main Gym $65 Pool (exclusive use) $75 Lifeguard $25 Tanning Member Non-Member Daily $7 $9 2 Week $20 $25 1 Month $30 $40 Annual $360 $480 9 Pre-REC Center Facility Use SUMMER 2007 Program Pre-REC Center Location Post-REC Center Location TEEN NIGHT RR BLDG LETS MAKE DESSERTS RR BLDG SUMMER FUN DAYS RR BLDG Preschool Rm IVIGIVIS POPS _R TOTS RR BLDG Preschool Rm BROTHERS &SISTERS RR BLDG Preschool Rm MOVING & GROOVING RR BLDG Preschool Rm DINOSAURS, BUGS &TRUCKS RR BLDG Preschool Rm COMPUTER TOTS SUMMER SERICES REC OFFICE classroom AROUND THE WORLD WITH COMPUTER TOTS REC OFFICE classroom PRINCESS PLAYTIME RR BLDG classroom CHEFS IN TRAINING RR BLDG classroom PARKER PLAYTIME RESCHOOL Y CONG CHURCH Preschool Rm PARKER PLAYTIME RESCHOOL RR BLDG Preschool Rm SAFETY TOWN RR BLDG classroom MUD PIES & DIRTY KNEES RR BLDG classroom JUNIOR FUN-GINEERING REC OFFICE classroom CARTOON ACTION-YOUNG REMBRANDTS RR BLDG classroom SPANISH FOR BEGINNERS RR BLDG classroom LIGHTS, CAMERA ACTION REC OFFICE classroom ILLINOIS URBAN FISHING REC OFFICE classroom INTRO TO GEOCACHING REC OFFICE classroom LETS GO FISHING REC OFFICE classroom 3 LIONS AND GENESIS SOCCER CAMP BEECHER PARK classroom KIDDIE CAMP RR BLDG classroom SUMMER ADVENTURE CAMP RR BLDG JR ZOO CAMP-YOUNG REMBRANDTS RR BLDG classroom CAMP 911 RR BLDG classroom GENESIS SOCCER CLUB classroom JUNIOR GOLF CAMP BLACKBERRY OAKS GC classroom WHITE SOX BASEBALL CAMP BEECHER PARK classroom ALL STAR SOCCER BEECHER PARK classroom ALL STAR SOCCER 2 BEECHER PARK classroom ALL STAR SUPER SPORT BEECHER PARK classroom ALL STAR PARENT TOT BEECHER PARK classroom ALL STAR T-BALL LEAGUE BEECHER PARK classroom ALL STAR LACROSSE BEECHER PARK Schools ALL STAR FLAG FOOTBALL CAMP BEECHER PARK Schools ALL STAR GOLF BEECHER PARK Schools 2 MUCH FUN GOLD STAR Schools BEGINNING BALLET/TAP GOLD STAR Schools CREATIVE DANCE GOLD STAR Bristol Bay BEGINNING ACROBATICS GOLD STAR Beecher-School Gym MUSICAL THEATRE GOLD STAR Beecher-School Gym SUMMER 2007 Program Pre-REC Center Location Post-REC Center Location BALLET 1 GOLD STAR Beecher-School Gym TAP 1 GOLD STAR Beecher-School Gym TEEN HIP HOP GOLD STAR Beecher-School Gym MARTIAL ARTS FOR CHILDREN EMPOWER Beecher-School Gym KICKBOXING FITNESS CHOREO EMPOWER Beecher-School Gym KICKBOXING FITNESS CIRCUIT EMPOWER DYNOMITE KARATE EMPOWER LITTLE DRAGON KARATE EMPOWER SAMURAI WARIOR EMPOWER WHITE & ORANGE BELT CLASS EMPOWER LITTLE DRAGON KARATE EMPOWER SAMURAI WARIOR EMPOWER YELLOW BELT& HIGHER CLASS EMPOWER LITTLE DRAGON KARATE EMPOWER SAMURAI WARIOR EMPOWER GREENBELT& HIGHER EMPOWER JUNIOR/ADULT KAJUKENBO KARATE EMPOWER PICNIC IN THE PARK RIVERFRONT PARK BASEBALL TRIPS BEECHER CENTER FITNESS YOGA RR BLDG PILATES RR BLDG FLOW YOGA RR BLDG ONE STROKE ACRYLIC RR BLDG ADULT COED SOFTBALL BRIDGE REGIONAL BALL FIELDS WOMENS GOLF CLINIC BLACKBERRY OAKS GC ADVANCED WOMENS GOLF CLINIC BLACKBERRY OAKS GC MENS SOFTBALL BRIDGE REGIONAL BALL FIELDS Music Under the Stars Town Square Outdoor Movie Nights Beecher Hometown Days Festival Beecher FALL 2007 Program Pre-REC Center Location Post-REC Center Location BASEBALL TRIPS-SOX BEECHER CC LOCK IN RR BLDG discontinued TOT ROCK RR BLDG classroom KID ROCK 3 RR BLDG classroom KID ROCK 1 RR BLDG classroom KID ROCK 2 RR BLDG classroom SHAKE WIGGLE & GIGGLE RR BLDG classroom MOMS AND TOTS RR BLDG classroom PLATES, TRAINS & DINOSUARS, RR BLDG classroom PRINCESS, DOLLS & CRAFTS RR BLDG classroom BUSY BEES RR BLDG classroom PARKER PLAYTIME PRESCHOOL Y CONG CHURCH preschool PARKER PLAYTIME PRESCHOOL RR BLDG preschool LETS GET BUSY RR BLDG classroom MINI GINGERBREAD HOUSE RR BLDG classroom MOVING & GROOVING RR BLDG School Gym READY SET GO RR BLDG discontinued TURKEY TIME RR BLDG classroom CHEFS IN TRAINING W/MOM RR BLDG classroom WEARABLE ART REC OFFICE classroom COLONIAL AMERICAN ART REC OFFICE classroom THE ART OF ANCIENT EGYPT REC OFFICE classroom HALLOWEEN PUMPKIN DECORATING REC OFFICE classroom DRAWING PEOPLE REC OFFICE classroom LETS GET MESSY RR BLDG HOLIDAY CRAFT WORKSHOP REC OFFICE classroom LITTLE CHEFS RR BLDG classroom COMPUTERTOTS REC OFFICE classroom JURASSIC CINEMA REC OFFICE classroom FUN-GINEERING W/SIMPLE MACHINES REC OFFICE classroom CLAYMATION CINEMA REC OFFICE classroom SOAR CLUB YIS SOAR CLUB GRES INTRO TO GEOCASHING REC OFFICE classroom CHEFS IN TRAINING RR BLDG classroom 1ST& 2ND GRADE BASKETBALL CCGS School Gym 3 &4 GRADE BASKETBALL YIS School Gym 5 & 6 GRADE GIRLS BASKETBALL YMS School Gym 7 & 8 GRADE GIRLS TRAVEL BASKETBALL YMS School Gym BOYS TRAVEL B-BALL YMS School Gym GENESIS SOCCER CLUB 2007-2008 Beecher ALL STARS PARENT TOT CCGS Beecer-School Gym ALL SATR B-BALL CCGS Beecher-School Gym FALL 2007 Program Pre-REC Center Location Post-REC Center Location ALL STAR SUPER SPORT CCGS Beecher-School Gym ALL STARS T-BALL CCGS Beecer-School Gym ALL STAR FLAG FOOTBALL CCGS Beecher-School Gym ALL STAR SOCCER CCGS Beecher-School Gym ALL STAR BASKETBALL CCGS Beecher-School Gym TWO MUCH FUN GOLD STAR BEGINNING BALLET/JAZZ GOLD STAR CREATIVE DANCE GOLD STAR BEGINNING ACROBATICS GOLD STAR MUSICAL THEATRE 1 GOLD STAR BALLET 1 GOLD STAR TEEN HIP HOP GOLD STAR MARTIAL ARTS FOR CHILDREN EMPOWER KICKBOXING FITNESS CHOREO EMPOWER KICKBOXING FITNESS CIRCUIT EMPOWER DYNOMITE KARATE 4-5 EMPOWER LITTLE DRAGON 6-7 EMPOWER SAMURAI WARRIOR 8-11 EMPOWER WHITE & ORANGE BELT EMPOWER LITTLE DRAGON 6-7 EMPOWER SAMURAI WARRIOR 8-11 EMPOWER GREEN BELT& HIGHER EMPOWER JUNIOR EMPOWER ADULT KAJUKENBO EMPOWER PUMPKIN CARVING RR BLDG classroom BAUBLES AND BEADS REC OFFICE classroom FAUX DIAMOND TENNIS BRACELET REC OFFICE classroom FITNESS YOGA RR BLDG classroom PILATES RR BLDG classroom FLOW YOGA RR BLDG classroom ADULT COED SOFTBALL BRIDGE REGIONAL BALLFIELDS MEN'S B-BALL LEAGUE YMS MEN'S SOFTBALL BRIDGE REGIONAL BALLFIELDS RALLY OBEDIENCE COUNTRY COMFORT KENNELS BEGINNERS KNITTING REC OFFICE BOCCE BALL CLUB HIGH SCHOOL DANCES BEECHER CC POLAR EXPRESS MOVIE NIGHT RR BLDG classroom POLAR EXPRESS AURORA METRA STATION SPRING 2008 Program Pre-REC Center Location Post-REC Center Location ALL STAR T-BALL YVILLE GRADE SCHOOL Beecher Park-School Gym ALL STAR PARENT/TOT GRES Beecher Park-School Gym POWER SORT CLASS RR BLDG Classroom MOMS &TOTS RR BLDG Classroom - Preschool MOVING & GROOVING RR BLDG Classroom -School Gym LITTLE LEARNERS RR BLDG Classroom - Preschool READY, SET GO RR BLDG Classroom - Preschool BUSY BEES RR BLDG Classroom KID ROCK 1 RR BLDG Classroom KID ROCK 2 RR BLDG Classeoom TOT ROCK RR BLDG Classroom CRAFTS, SONGS & PLAYTIME RR BLDG Classroom BUNNY CRAFTS RR BLDG Classroom FLOWER POTS RR BLDG Beecher Park MAKE YOUR MOM A... RR BLDG Classroom BUSY BEES II RR BLDG Classroom nniinnnQ RR BLDG PRINCESS PLAYTIME RR BLDG Classroom SIGN LANGUAGE REC OFFICE Classroom PRE-TUMBLING RR BLDG School Gym LET'S GET BUSY RR BLDG Classroom DINOSAURS, BUGS &TRUCKS RR BLDG Classroom LET'S MAKE DESSERTS RR BLDG Classroom PARKERS PLAYTIME PRESCHOOL N Y CONG CHURCH Preschool PARKERS PLAYTIME PRESCHOOL S RR BLDG Preschool KID'S CLUB RR BLDG Classroom FUN WITH PRINTMAKING RR BLDG Classroom YOUNG EINSTEIN'S RR BLDG Classroom CARTOONING RR BLDG Classroom SPRINGTIME GARDEN MOSAICS RR BLDG Classroom DOLL MAKING REC OFFICE AFTER SCHOOL SNACKS RR BLDG Classroom BEGINNING GUITAR YIS CLASSROOM Classroom GUITAR BOOT CAMP YIS CLASSROOM Classroom CHEERLEADING/TUMBLING RR BLDG School Gym BABYSITTING SAFETY REC OFFICE Classroom LET'S TEAM UP YIS CLASSROOM School Gym SPRING BREAK CAMP RR BLDG discontinued CAMP 911 RR BLDG discontinued KIDDIE CAMP RR BLDG Preschool SUMMER ADVENTURE CAMP RR BLDG discontinued SAFETY TOWN RR BLDG Preschool EQUESTRIAN RIDING CLASS AUTUMN ACRES SPRING 2008 Program Pre-REC Center Location Post-REC Center Location EQUESTRIAN SUMMER DAY! AMP AUTUMN ACRES SPRING SOCCER ROTARY PARK GR Bristol Bay SPRING SOCCER BEECHER COM PARK Bristol Bay ALL STAR PARENT/TOT SUPER SPORT GRES Beeceher-School Gym ALL STAR BASKETBALL GRES Beeceher-School Gym ALL STAR SOCCER GRES Beeceher-School Gym ALL STAR T-BALL GRES Beeceher-School Gym ALL STAR FLAG FOOTBALL GRES Beeceher-School Gym ALL STAR FLOOR HOCKEY GRES Beeceher-School Gym ALL STAR PARENT/TOT BEECHER COM PARK Beeceher-School Gym TOO MUCH FUN GOLD STAR DANCE CREATIVE DANCE GOLD STAR DANCE TUMBLE RHYTHMS GOLD STAR DANCE EXPLORE DANCE GOLD STAR DANCE BALLET GOLD STAR DANCE JAZZ/HIP HOP GOLD STAR DANCE DANCE TECH GOLD STAR DANCE BALLROOM DANCE GOLD STAR DANCE ADULT DANCE WORKOUT GOLD STAR DANCE INTRO TO ACTING GOLD STAR DANCE IMPROV/IMAGINATION GOLD STAR DANCE MARTIAL ARTS FOR CHILDEREN EMPOWER KICKBOXING FITNESS CHOREOGRAPHY EMPOWER KICKBOXING FITNESS CIRCUIT EMPOWER DYNOMITE KARATE EMPOWER LITTLE DRAGON EMPOWER SAMURAI WARRIOR EMPOWER WHITE & ORANGE BELT EMPOWER LITTLE DRAGON EMPOWER SAMURAI WARRIOR EMPOWER YELLOW BELT& HIGHER EMPOWER LITTLE DRAGON EMPOWER SAMURAI WARRIOR EMPOWER GREEN BELT& HIGHER EMPOWER JUNIOR EMPOWER ALDULT KAJUKENBO EMPOWER EASTER EGG-XPRESS AURORA METRA FLYING 4 KIDS KITE EVENT BEECHER COM PARK FLOW YOGA REC OFFICE discontinued FITNESS YOGA REC OFFICE discontinued PILATES RR BLDG discontinued CO-ED SPRING SOFTBALL STEVEN BRIDGE FIELDS Bridge ADULT MEN'S SPRING SOFTBALL STEVEN BRIDGE FIELDS Bridge FAUX DIAMOND TENNIS RR BLDG classroom BAUBLES AND BEEDS RR BLDG Classroom SPRING 2008 Program Pre-REC Center Location Post-REC Center Location PUPPY DISCOVERY COUNTRY COMFORT KENNELS FAST& FUN ALBUM MAKING RR BLDG classroom ALBUM MAKING WITH PAPER RR BLDG classroom NINE BIG INVESTORY MISTAKES RR BLDG classroom DIGITAL STORYBOOKS RR BLDG classroom BOATING SAFETY CLASS BEECHER CC classroom BUILDING YO R run u-S EDI i FUND REC OFFICE IMPROVING YOUR BUS SKILLS LIBRARY classroom LONG GROVE SHOPING DAY RFP DRURY LANE THEATRE RFP SPIRIT OF PEORIA TRIP BEECHER CC