The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet 2012 04-24-12 C United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST. 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 o i � � � Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 <LE AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, April 24, 2012 Call to Order: Pledge of Allegiance: Moment of Silence for Eric Lederman: Please remain standing. Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV George Gilson,Jr. Jackie Milschewski Marty Munns Rose Ann Spears Carlo Colosimo Larry Kot Chris Funkhouser Diane Teeling Establishment of Quorum: Amendments to Agenda: Presentations: 1. Certificate of Recognition Presented to Eagle Scout Samuel Fellerer 2. Certificate of Recognition Presented to the Cross Lutheran Basketball Team 3. Proclamation for Poppy Days Public Hearings: 1. Electric Aggregation Plan Citizen Comments: Consent Agenda: 1. CC 2012-32 Bills for Payment - $866,313.19 2. PW 2012-25 Preliminary Engineering Services Agreement with HR Green, Inc. for Somonauk Street and Game Farm Road Construction—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 3. PW 2012-26 Preliminary Engineering Services Agreement with Engineering Enterprises, Inc. for Safe Routes to School Sidewalk Grant—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 4. ADM 2012-16 Monthly Treasurer's Reports for February and March 2012 5. ADM 2012-20 Resolution Approving a Revised Capital Asset Policy—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 6. ADM 2012-21 First Amendment to the Contract for Garbage, Refuse, Recyclables &Yard Waste Collection between the United City of Yorkville and Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC— authorize Mayor to execute City Council Meeting Agenda April 24, 2012 Page 2 Consent Agenda (cont'd): 7. ADM 2012-22 Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of Motor Fuel Tax Funds to a New Account with the Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund(IMET)—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 8. ADM 2012-23 Resolution Approving a Revised Fund Balance Policy—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 9. ADM 2012-24 Copier RFP Vendor Selection—award contract for City copier equipment to McGrath Office Equipment for a term of 36-months Minutes for Approval: 1. CC 2012-33 Minutes of the City Council—March 27, 2012 2. CC 2012-34 Minutes of the City Council—April 10, 2012 Mayor's Report: 1. CC 2012-35 Ordinance Approving the Second Intergovernmental Agreement for Replacement of the River Road Bridge over Blackberry Creek Public Works Committee Report: Economic Development Committee Report: Public Safety Committee Report: Administration Committee Report: Park Board: Plan Commission: 1. PC 2012-02 D Construction Spoil/Fill Site (Evergreen Farms Estate) Special Use Request Zoning Board of Appeals: City Council Report: 1. CC 2012-36 Procedural Ordinance Amendment— Summer Meeting Schedule City Clerk's Report: City Treasurer's Report: Community and Liaison Report: Staff Report: Additional Business: Executive Session: Adjournment: City Council Meeting Agenda April 24, 2012 Page 3 COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES - - -4 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADMINIRATION: May 17, 2012–6_00 p.m.=�Hall Conference Rooms Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Spears Finance Library Vice-Chairman: Alderman Gilson Administration Committee: Alderman Colosimo Committee: Alderman Munns ;ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: May 1,2012–7:00 p.m.–City Hall Conference Room! =-- — -------- — -----=----- --- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Munns Community Development Plan Commission Vice-Chairman: Alderman Funkhouser Building Safety and Zoning Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp. Committee: Alderman Milschewski Kendall Co. Plan Commission Committee: Alderman Teeling PUBLIC SAFETY:_May 3, 2012–6:30 p.m.=City Hall Conference-_Roo --- ------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Colosimo Police Human Resource Comm. Vice-Chairman: Alderman Kot School District Committee: Alderman Spears Committee: Alderman Funkhouser �PUBLIC WORKS: May_1512012–6:00 p.m.–City Hall Conference Room --- -- ---------------------- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Gilson Public Works Park Board Vice-Chairman: Alderman Milschewski Engineering Y3SD Committee: Alderman Kot Parks and Recreation Committee: Alderman Teeling UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, April 24, 2012 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENTATIONS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Certificate of Recognition Presented to Eagle Scout Samuel Fellerer 2. Certificate of Recognition Presented to the Cross Lutheran Basketball Team 3. Proclamation for Poppy Days ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC HEARINGS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Electric Aggregation Plan ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONSENT AGENDA: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2012-32 Bills for Payment - $866,313.19 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2012-25 Preliminary Engineering Services Agreement with HR Green, Inc. for Somonauk St and Game Farm Road Construction ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2012-26 Preliminary Engineering Services Agreement with Engineering Enterprises, Inc. for Safe Routes to School Sidewalk Grant ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. ADM 2012-16 Monthly Treasurer's Reports for February and March 2012 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. ADM 2012-20 Resolution Approving a Revised Capital Asset Policy ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. ADM 2012-21 First Amendment to the Contract for Garbage, Refuse, Recyclables &Yard Waste Collection between the United City of Yorkville and Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. ADM 2012-22 Resolution Authorizing the Transfer of MFT Funds to a New Account with IMET ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. ADM 2012-23 Resolution Approving a Revised Fund Balance Policy ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. ADM 2012-24 Copier RFP Vendor Selection ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2012-33 Minutes of the City Council—March 27, 2012 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes 2. CC 2012-34 Minutes of the City Council—April 10, 2012 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR'S REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2012-35 Ordinance Approving the Second Intergovernmental Agreement for Replacement of the River Road Bridge Over Blackberry Creek ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLAN COMMISSION: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PC 2012-02 D Construction Spoil/Fill Site (Evergreen Farms Estate) Special Use Request ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY COUNCIL REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2012-36 Procedural Ordinance Amendment— Summer Meeting Schedule ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPORTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� $ an Legal ❑ Presentation#3 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ -_� City Administrator El Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources E]� wn sw �© Community Development ❑ Police ❑ Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Proclamation for Poppy Days Meeting and Date: City Council—April 24, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: none Council Action Requested: none Submitted by: Mayor Golinski Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE J Whereas, America is the land of freedom, preserved and protected willingly and freely by citizen soldiers; Whereas, millions who have answered the call to arms have died on the field of battle; Whereas, a nation of peace must be reminded of the price of war and the debt owed to those who have died in war; Whereas, the red poppy has been designated as a symbol of sacrifice of lives in all wars; Whereas, the America Legion Post 489 and America Legion Auxiliary Unit 489 have pledged to remind America annually of this debt through the distribution of the memorial flower, so that May 18, 19, and 209 2012 may serve as "Poppy Awareness Days". Therefore, I, Gary J. Golinski, Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, do hereby proclaim "Poppy Awareness Days" in the United City of Yorkville, and request all citizens to observe these days by wearing a Poppy and making contributions for this worthy cause. Dated this 24th day of April, 2012, A.D. Gary J. Golinski, Mayor Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number •s► Legal : Public Hearing#1 Finance EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number m Human Resources ❑ Community Development ❑ Police ALE Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Electric Aggregation Plan Meeting and Date: City Council April 24, 2012 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 11/22/11 Action Taken: Approval of Ordinance No. 2011-74 Item Number: ADM 2011-49 Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: Mayor and City Council EST. , = 1836 From: Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director .t b Date: April 20, 2012 Subject: Municipal Aggregation KantlaElCOUnry <LE This memorandum is intended to give a brief summary of the steps the City must take to complete the municipal aggregation process,which was approved by voters on March 20th. First, two public hearings must be held, which are scheduled for April 24t and May 8th. A representative from NIMEC should be present at the both meetings to answer questions. After the second public hearing on May 8th, the Council will need to adopt an ordinance authorizing the City to administer the aggregation program, according to the terms of the Plan of Operation and Governance (attached for your review). Once the Plan of Operation and Governance is approved, the City will be ready to go to bid. The only remaining issue will be the negotiation of the Power Supply Agreement between the City and the winning supplier. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ELECTRIC POWER AGGREGATION PLAN OF OPERATION AND GOVERNANCE April 24, 2012 1 United City of Yorkville Electric Power Aggregation Plan of Operation and Governance I. INTRODUCTION Public Act 96-1076 amended the Illinois Power Agreement Act by adding Section 1- 92 to Chapter 20, Act 3855 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes ("the Act") and allowed the Corporate Authorities of a municipality to adopt an ordinance in accordance with the Act to aggregate electrical loads for residential and small commercial retail customers within the corporate limits of the City on an opt-out or opt-in program. The Act further authorized a municipality to select suppliers of retail electric supply, solicit bids and enter into service agreements to facilitate the sale and purchase of electricity and related services. The legislation authorized the Illinois Power Agency ("IPA") to assist a municipality in developing a plan of operation and governance. Large industrial and commercial consumers with sophisticated electric operations use their size and expertise to obtain lower electric power rates. Individual residential and small commercial retail consumers are typically unable to obtain significant price reductions since they lack the same bargaining power, expertise and the economies of scale enjoyed by larger consumers. Aggregation, the combining of multiple electric loads, provides the benefits of retail electric competition for consumers with lower electric usage. Municipal aggregation, the combining of multiple retail electric loads of customers by a municipality, provides the means through which municipal residential and small commercial retail customers may obtain economic benefits of Illinois' competitive retail electric market. The Yorkville Aggregation Program combines the electric loads of residential and small commercial retail customers to form a buying group ("Aggregation Group"). The United City of Yorkville ("City" or "Yorkville") will act as purchasing agent for the Aggregation Group. Therefore, the City will be a Municipal or Governmental Aggregator, as described by Illinois law and the rules established by authorized agencies, and shall act on behalf of Commonwealth Edison Company, an affiliate of Exelon Corporation (herein referred to as "ComEd" or "Commonwealth Edison") in the City to obtain the best Aggregation Program for the Members of the Aggregation Group. IL PROCESS On March 20, 2012, in accordance with the requirements of the Act, voters of the City approved a referendum to operate an Aggregation Program as an "opt-out" program. Under the opt-out program, all ComEd residential and small commercial retail customers in the City are automatically included as participants in the Program unless they opt-out of the Program by providing written notice of their intention not to participate as a part of the Aggregation Group. As required by state law, the Corporate Authorities of the City duly passed an Ordinance which authorized submitting to the City's electorate the determination whether or not the Aggregation Program shall operate as an opt-out program. Following 2 the approval of the referendum by the electorate, the City passed Ordinance number on , 2012 authorizing the City to aggregate electric loads for residential and small commercial retail customers in the City and implement an opt-out program. In addition to passing the required ordinances by the Corporate Authorities, the City may also be required to comply with various rules and regulations established by authorized agencies of the State of Illinois. The City will promptly file any application and comply with any applicable rules and regulations that may be required by Illinois law for certification as a Municipal Aggregator and to operate the Aggregation Program under the Act. As required by the Act, the Corporate Authorities developed and approved this Aggregation Plan of Operation and Governance ("Plan"). Before adopting this Plan and as required by the Act, the Corporate Authorities duly published a notice in the Kendall County Record, a newspaper of general circulation in the City, of public hearings to be held on April 24, 2012 and May 8, 2012 at 7:00 o'clock P.M. The public hearings were held by the Corporate Authorities at City Hall and provided the residents of the City a meaningful opportunity to be heard regarding the Aggregation Program and this Plan. The Corporate Authorities considered the concerns of the residents and information disclosed at the hearings in the development of this Plan. The opt-out notice for the Aggregation Program shall be provided in advance to all eligible electric customers in the City upon approval of this Plan according to the opt-out disclosure program developed by the City. The opt-out notice and disclosures shall comply with the Act and all applicable rules and regulations of any authorized agency in the State of Illinois and shall fully inform such customers in advance that they have the right to opt-out of the Aggregation Program. The opt-out notice shall disclose all required information including but not limited to the rates, terms and conditions of the Program and the specific method to opt-out of the Program. By majority vote of the Corporate Authorities, the City may select a Retail Electric Supplier ("RES" or "Provider") to provide the electric power for the Yorkville Aggregation Program according to the terms of a written service agreement entered into by and between the Provider and the City. By majority vote of the Corporate Authorities, the City may determine not to enter into a service agreement with any Provider and in such event the Aggregation Group shall continue to purchase electric power through Commonwealth Edison. If the Corporate Authorities enter into a service agreement with a Provider, Commonwealth Edison will continue to provide and service delivery of the electricity purchased from the Provider, and metering, repairs and emergency service will continue to be provided by Commonwealth Edison. The Corporate Authorities have determined that each participant in the Aggregation Group shall receive a single monthly bill from Commonwealth Edison under applicable tariffs. III. DEFINITIONS In order to clarify certain terminology, the following terms as used in this Plan shall have the meanings set forth below: "Aggregation Group" shall mean all the residential and small commercial retail customers of ComEd in the corporate limits of the City that have not opted out of the Program and 3 are permitted under the terms of the Act to participate in the Program. "Aggregation Program" or "Program" means the program developed and implemented by the City of Yorkville, as a Municipal Aggregator under the Act, to provide ComEd residential and small commercial retail customers in the City with retail electric generation services. "Municipal Aggregator" means the City operating an Aggregation Program under the legislative authority granted the City to act as an aggregator to provide a competitive retail electric service to residential and small commercial retail customers of ComEd in the City. Pursuant to the Act, an Aggregator is not a public utility or an alternative retail electric supplier. "Member" means a person or legal entity enrolled in the Yorkville Municipal Aggregation Program for competitive retail electric services and a member of the Aggregation Group. "Retail Electric Supplier" ( "RES" or "Provider") means an entity certified by all required authorities of the State of Illinois to provide competitive retail electric supply service(s), and which is duly selected by the City to be the entity responsible to provide the required retail electrical supply service related to an Aggregation Program as defined in the Act, City Ordinances and applicable rules and regulations of any authorized agency of the State of Illinois and has duly executed a Power Supply Agreement with the City. IV. OPERATIONAL PLAN: A. Aggregation Services 1. Provider: The City will use a competent entity as a Provider to perform and manage aggregation services for Members of the Aggregation Program. The Provider shall provide adequate, accurate, and understandable pricing, terms and conditions of service, including but not limited to no switching fees and the conditions under which a Member may opt-out without penalty. The Provider must provide the City, upon request, an electronic file containing the Members usage, charges for retail supply service and such other information reasonably requested by the City. 2. Database: The Retail Electric Supplier shall create and maintain a secure database of all Members. The database will include the name, address, Commonwealth Edison account number, and Retail Electric Suppliers' account number of each active Member, and other pertinent information such as rate code, rider code (if applicable), most recent 12 months of usage and demand, and meter reading cycle. The database will be updated at least quarterly. Accordingly, the Provider will develop and implement a program to accommodate Members who (i) leave the Aggregation Group due to relocation, opting out, etc. (ii) decide to join the Aggregation Group; (iii) relocate anywhere within the corporate limits of the City, or (iv) move into the City and elect to join the Aggregation Group. This database shall also be capable of removing a Member from the Aggregation Group who has duly opted out of the Program. The Provider will use this database to perform audits for 4 clerical and mathematical accuracy of Member electric supply bills. The Provider will make the database available to the City at any time the City requests it. 3. Member Education: The Provider shall develop and implement, with the assistance of the City, as the City may determine in its sole discretion, an educational program that generally explains the Aggregation Program to all residential and small commercial retail customers in the City and the Aggregation Group, provides updates and disclosures mandated by Illinois law and applicable rules and regulations, and implements a process to allow any Member the opportunity to opt out of the Aggregation Program according to the terms of the Power Supply Agreement. See Appendix A for further details. 4. Customer Service: Provider shall hire and maintain an adequate customer service staff and develop and administer a written customer service process that will accommodate Member inquiries and complaints about billing and answer questions regarding the Aggregation Program in general. This process will include a description of how telephone inquiries will be handled, either internally or externally, how invoices will be prepared, how Members may remit remittance payment, and how collection of delinquent accounts will be addressed. The Provider and the City will enter into a separate customer service plan agreement or the terms shall be included in the Power Supply Agreement. 5. Billing: Commonwealth Edison will provide a monthly billing statement to each Member which shall include the charges of the Provider, and the Provider will not charge any additional administrative fee. 6. Compliance Process: The Provider shall develop internal controls and processes to ensure that the City remains in good standing as a Municipal Aggregator and ensure that the City and the Program complies with the Act and all applicable laws, rules and regulations, as they may be amended from time to time. It will be the Provider's responsibility to timely deliver reports at the request of the City that will include (i) the number of Members participating in the Program; (ii) a savings estimate or increase from the previous year's baseline; (iii) such other information reasonably requested by the City; (iv) comparison of the Members' charge for the supply of electricity from one designated period to another identified by the City. The Provider shall also develop a process to monitor and shall promptly notify the City in writing of any changes or amendments to the Act or any laws, rules or regulations applicable to the Aggregation Program. 7. Notification to Commonwealth Edison: The residential and small commercial retail customers of ComEd in the City that do not opt-out of the Aggregation Program will be enrolled automatically in the Aggregation Program by a Provider. Members of the Aggregation Group will not be asked to take affirmative steps to be included in the Aggregation Group. To the extent that ComEd requires notification of participation; the Provider shall provide such notice to ComEd. The Provider will inform ComEd from time to time through electronic means any new members that it is enrolling into the Aggregation Group. 5 8. Plan Requirements: Pursuant to the Act, the Provider selected by the City and the City shall: a. Provide for universal access to all applicable residential customers and equitable treatment of applicable residential customers; b. Describe demand management and energy efficiency services to be provided to each class of customers; c. Meet any requirements established by law concerning aggregated service offered pursuant to the Act. 9. Solicitation of Bids: Pursuant to the requirements of the Act, the process of soliciting bids for electricity and related services and awarding power supply agreements for the purchase of electricity and other related services by the City, shall be conducted in the following manner: a. The Corporate Authorities of the City may solicit bids for electricity and other related services. b. Notwithstanding Section 16-122 of the Public Utilities Act and Section 2HH of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, an electric utility that provides residential and small commercial retail electric service in the City must, upon request of the Corporate Authorities of the City, submit to the requesting party, in an electronic format, those names and addresses of residential and small commercial retail electrical retail customers in the City that are reflected in the electrical utilities records at the time of the request and such other information required by the Act or any applicable rule or regulation of an authorized Illinois agency. c. The City, upon receiving customer information from an electric utility shall be subject to the limitations on the disclosure of that information described in Section 16-122 of the Public Utilities Act and Section 2HH of the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act, and an electric utility providing such information shall not be held liable for any claims arising out of the provision of information pursuant to this Section and the Act. B. Power Supply Agreement The Corporate Authorities of the City and the Provider shall duly execute and enter into a Power Supply Agreement to serve the Aggregation Group. C. City's Retail Electric Supplier The City may require the Provider to satisfy each of the following requirements in the Power Supply Agreement: • Have sufficient sources of power to provide retail firm power to the Aggregation Group. 6 • Maintain a license as a Federal Power Marketer with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. • Maintain a certification from the State of Illinois as a certified retail electric supplier and any and all other licenses or certifications required by Illinois law. • Register as a retail electric supplier with ComEd. • Maintain a Service Agreement for Network Integration Transmission Service under Open Access Transmission Tariff. • Maintain a Service Agreement under Market-based Rate Tariff. • Maintain the necessary corporate structure to sell retail firm power to the ComEd residential and small commercial retail customers in the City and the Aggregation Group. • Maintain an Electronic Data Interchange computer network that is fully functional at all times and capable of handling the ComEd residential and small commercial retail electric customers in the City and the Aggregation Group. • Maintain the marketing ability to reach all ComEd residential and small commercial retail customers in the City to educate them on the terms of the Aggregation Program and the Act. • Maintain a call center capable of handling calls from Members of the Aggregation Group. • Maintain a local or toll-free telephone number for customer service and complaints related to the City's Aggregation Program. • Agree in a binding written agreement between the City and the Provider to hold the City financially harmless and fully indemnifying the City from any and all financial obligations arising from supplying power to the Aggregation Group. • Satisfy the credit requirements of the State of Illinois and the City. • Have the binding authority (to the satisfaction of legal counsel for the City) to execute the Power Supply Agreement with the City and be fully bound by all of its terms and conditions. • Assist the City in filing all reports required by the Act and any applicable law, rule or regulation, as may be amended form time to time. • Assist the City in developing a Consumer Education Plan. • Assist the City in developing a smart-meter program D. Activation of Service After a notice is mailed to all residential and small commercial retail electric customers in the City providing an opportunity to opt out of the Program within a specific period of time, all customers who do not opt out in writing will be automatically enrolled in the Program. Customer enrollment with the Provider will occur thereafter without further action by the customer on terms set forth in the Power Supply Agreement and according to the retail tariffs of Commonwealth Edison. E. Changes, Extension or Renewal of Service The Power Supply Agreement with the Provider will provide when service shall begin and end. If the Power Supply Agreement is extended or renewed, Members will be notified as to any change in rates or service conditions and other information required by 7 law. The Power Supply Agreement shall describe the terms upon which a Member or non- member will be given an opportunity to opt into or out of the Program, and reasonable notice will be provided as required by the Act or any applicable law. Members who opt-out will also be notified of their right to select an alternate retail electric supplier and of their ability to return to ComEd provided supply service. F. Termination of Service In the event that any Power Supply Agreement is terminated for any reason prior to the end of the scheduled term, each Member of the Aggregation Group will receive prompt written notification of termination of the Program at least sixty (60) days prior to termination of service under the Agreement. If the Agreement is not extended or renewed, Members will be notified in a manner determined by the City and any applicable law, prior to the end of any service. Members will also be notified of their right to select an alternate retail electric supplier and of their ability to return to ComEd provided supply service upon termination of the Agreement. G. Opt-In Procedures ComEd residential and small commercial retail customers will be automatically enrolled in the Aggregation Program after any opt-out period has expired, unless they timely call the Provider's 800 number and/or return in writing a form to be provided notifying the Provider that they do not want to participate in the Aggregation Program. The Provider may provide special notice directly to categories of ComEd customers as the City may direct, and inform such customers of specific potential consequences of their change from existing service from ComEd to the Program, including but not limited to (i) space heating customers, (ii) Real Time (Hourly) pricing customers, (iii) customers using an electrical supplier other than ComEd or the Provider. ComEd residential and small commercial retail customers in the City may request to join the Aggregation Group after the expiration of any enrollment period by contacting the Provider, who shall accept them into the Aggregation Program, subject to written policies mutually agreed upon between the City and the Provider in the Power Supply Agreement. The agreed upon policy shall be consistent with ComEd's supplier enrollment requirements. Members of the Aggregation Group who move from one location to another within the corporate limits of the City shall continue as a Member of the Aggregation Group. H. Opt-out Procedures ComEd residential and small commercial retail customers in the City may opt-out of the Aggregation Program at any time during the opt-out period. The Provider may or may not charge an early termination fee. Members of the Aggregation Group will be allowed to switch to a different electric supplier after the expiration of the opt-out period on the terms set forth in the Power Supply Agreement but at least shall be allowed to opt-out every three years. Requirements for notification of intent to opt-out of the Aggregation Group shall be set forth in the Power Supply Agreement. Consumers who opt-out of the Aggregation Group will not be switched from their current supplier or their applicable to ComEd's Standard 8 Service Offer, until the consumer selects an alternate generation supplier. As required by the Act, it shall be the duty of the City or the Provider if so provided in the Power Supply Agreement, to fully inform residential and small commercial retail customers in the City in advance that they have the right to opt-out of the Aggregation Program. Such disclosure shall prominently state any charges to be made and shall include full disclosure of the cost to obtain service pursuant to Section 16-103 of the Public Utilities Act, how to access it, and the fact that it is available to them without penalty, if they are currently receiving services under that section. As further required by the Act, the IPA shall furnish, without charge, to any resident of the City, a list of all supply options available to them in a format that allows comparison of prices and products. I. Bid Process The City may elect to hold an individual bid or participate in a group bid. If the City elects to participate in a group bid, the City may use the northern Illinois Municipal Electric Collaborative Inc. ("NIMEC") to assist with the group bid. The City will not delegate any signing authority to NIMEC or other entity, but will make its own decision to accept or reject their individual bid resulting from the group bid. Suppliers will present individual bids to each community participating in the bid group. NIMEC will create an advisory group, representing and consisting of those communities participating in the bid, to determine the bid winner(s) on the day of the bid. NIMEC will then recommend that each City accept the bid winner's individual bid for the City. The City will then decide to accept or reject their individual bid. Whether or not each community participating in the bid accepts or rejects their individual bid will have no impact upon the individual bids of the other communities. V. MISCELLANEOUS GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES A. The Corporate Authorities of the City shall approve by an Ordinance passed by majority vote of the Corporate Authorities this Plan of Operation and Governance for the Aggregation program and any Amendments thereto. B. The Corporate Authorities of the City shall contract with a Provider certified by the Illinois Commerce Commission for the provision of Competitive Retail Electric Service to the Aggregation Group. C. The Corporate Authorities of the City will require any Provider to disclose any subcontractors that it uses in fulfillment of the services described above in the Power Supply Agreement. D. The Corporate Authorities of the City will require the Provider to maintain either a toll- free telephone number, or a telephone number that is local to the Members. 9 VI. LIABILITY THE CITY SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO PARTICIPANTS IN OR MEMBERS OF THE AGGREGATION GROUP FOR ANY CLAIMS, HOWEVER STYLED, ARISING OUT OF THE AGGREGATION PROGRAM OR THE PROVISION OF AGGREGATION SERVICES BY THE CITY OR THE PROVIDER. PARTICIPANTS OR MEMBERS IN THE AGGREGATION GROUP SHALL ASSERT ANY SUCH CLAIMS SOLELY AGAINST THE PROVIDER PURSUANT TO THE POWER SUPPLY AGREEMENT, UNDER WHICH SUCH PARTICIPANTS ARE EXPRESS THIRD-PARTY BENEFICIARIES. VII. INFORMATION AND COMPLAINT NUMBERS Copies of this Plan shall be available from the United City of Yorkville free of charge. Members and residential and small commercial retail customers of ComEd may call Yorkville City Hall at 630-553-4350 for a copy of the Plan or visit the City's website at www.yorkville.il.us for more information. 10 Appendix A -- Education Process The Provider shall develop the educational program in conjunction with the City. Its purpose will be to explain the Aggregation Program to its members, provide updates and disclosures as mandated by State law and the rules and regulations of any applicable Illinois agency, and provide the opportunity for the Members to Opt-out of the Aggregation Program. The following are components of the education program: 1. Each residential and small commercial retail customer of ComEd within the corporate limits of the City will receive notification by U.S. Mail stating: what the municipal Aggregation Program means, the procedure which must be followed to Opt-out of the Aggregation Program, the estimated price of electricity for Member of the Aggregation Program, and the deadline for returning the Opt-out form. See sample letter attached. 2. The Provider shall cooperate with the City to provide opportunities for educating residential and small commercial retail CE customers in the City about the Program and their rights under the applicable law and rules and regulations. In addition, the Provider and City will cooperate to provide education about opportunities for energy efficiency measures to help Members reduce energy consumption. 3. The Provider will provide updates and disclosures to the City and Members as mandated by State law and applicable rules and regulations as amended from time to time. 11 Dear United City of Yorkville Resident, The United City of Yorkville is providing you the opportunity to join other residents to save money on the electricity you use. Savings are possible through governmental aggregation,where City officials bring together citizens to gain group buying power for the purchase of electricity from a retail electric generation provider certified by the Public Illinois Utilities Commission. City of Yorkville voters approved this program in November,2010. After researching competitive electricity pricing options for you,we have chosen to provide you with savings on your electric generation through May 2012. There is no cost for enrollment and you will not be charged a switching fee.You do not need to do anything to participate. As a member of this aggregation,you are guaranteed to save percent off your Price to Compare.Your Price to Compare is essentially the price you pay for electric generation from the utility and consists of generation and transmission related components,which are the costs associated with generating the power and delivering it through the transmission system. To estimate what your savings per kilowatt-hour(KWH)will be through this program, locate your Price to Compare on your electric bill. Divide your Price to Compare by 100,then multiply by 0.0_(_%)to determine your savings per KWH. Multiply that number by your total monthly usage.The final number is how much you can expect to save each month you use the same amount of electricity. You will see your electric savings from after your enrollment has been completed and your switch has been finalized-approximately 30-45 days, depending upon your meter read date. Of course,you are not obligated to participate in the City of Yorkville's electric governmental aggregation program. If you wish to be excluded from the program and remain a full-service customer of your local electric utility-Commonwealth Edison-you have until 2012 to return the attached"opt-out"form. If you do not opt out at this time, you will receive a notice at least every asking if you wish to remain in the program. If you leave the program at any other time,you could be subject to a cancellation fee from -and you might not be served under the same rates,terms and conditions that apply to other customers served by Commonwealth Edison. After you become a participant in this governmental aggregation program, Commonwealth Edison will send you a letter confirming your selection of as your electric generation provider.As required by law,this letter will inform you of your option to rescind your enrollment with with adequate notice prior to the scheduled switch.To remain in the City's governmental aggregation program,you don't need to take any action when this letter arrives. Commonwealth Edison will continue to maintain the system that delivers power to your home-no new poles or wires will be built by .You will continue to receive a single, easy-to-read bill from your local electric utility with your charges included.The only thing you'll notice is savings. If you have any questions, please call toll-free at Monday through Friday, 8 a.m.to 5 p.m. Please do not call the United City of Yorkville with aggregation program questions. Sincerely, United City of Yorkville P.S.To receive these savings,you should not respond. Return the opt-out form only if you do not want to participate in the City's electric governmental aggregation program. Option 1: Do nothing and save. , Option 2: Opt out by returning this form. If you want to participate in this program and If you do not want to participate in this save,you do not need to return this form.Your program, enrollment is automatic. you must return this form before the due date. Service address(City,state and zip): Phone number: Account holder's signature: Date: 12 .1.3 0 CITY Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number d Legal ❑ `1 06 Legal CA#1 ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number 0 —� Human Resources ❑ �� Community Development ❑ K-44 Police ❑ CC 2012-32 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Bill Payments - $866,313.19 Meeting and Date: City Council-April 24, 2012 Synopsis: Approval of bill payments. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Amy Simmons Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DATE: 04/11/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 11:56:00 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/11/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513126 YORKPOST YORKVILLE POSTMASTER 041112 04/11/12 01 WATER OP-POSTAGE FOR PENALTY 51-510-54-00-5452 378.93 02 UTILITY BILLS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 378.93 CHECK TOTAL: 378.93 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 378.93 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513127 AA000003 DANIEL V. TRANSIER 033012 03/30/12 01 POLICE-03/07/12 & 03/21/ 12 01-210-54-00-5467 300.00 02 ADMIN HEARINGS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 300.00 513128 ACCURINT LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT. 1249304-20120331 03/31/12 01 POLICE-MARCH SEARCHES 01-210-54-00-5462 50.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 50.00 513129 AMERFAB AMERICAN FAB SUPPLY INC. 3011 02/28/12 01 STREETS-HAMMER DRILL SPLINE 01-410-56-00-5630 198.34 02 WATER OP-HAMMER DRILL SPLINE 51-510-56-00-5630 198.33 03 SEWER OP-HAMMER DRILL SPLINE 52-520-56-00-5630 198.33 INVOICE TOTAL: 595.00 CHECK TOTAL: 595.00 513130 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 610-7487381 04/03/12 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 27.32 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 27.32 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 27.32 INVOICE TOTAL: 81.96 610-7496902 04/10/12 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 27.07 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 27.07 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 27.07 INVOICE TOTAL: 81.21 CHECK TOTAL: 163.17 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513131 ATLAS ATLAS BOBCAT B19202 04/10/12 01 STREETS-FILTERS 01-410-56-00-5640 112.54 INVOICE TOTAL: 112.54 CHECK TOTAL: 112.54 513132 ATT AT&T 6305533436 0312 03/25/12 01 POLICE-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5440 44.34 INVOICE TOTAL: 44.34 6305536805-0312 03/25/12 01 WATER OP-MONTHLY CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5440 91.69 INVOICE TOTAL: 91.69 CHECK TOTAL: 136.03 513133 ATTLONG AT&T LONG DISTANCE 82893213-0312 04/01/12 01 POLICE-LONG DISTANCE CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5440 77.87 02 WATER OP-PW LONG DISTANCE 51-510-54-00-5440 66.03 03 CHARGES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 143.90 CHECK TOTAL: 143.90 513134 AWWA AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC 7000419395 11/29/11 01 WATER OP-ANNUAL DUE RENEWAL 51-510-54-00-5460 27.08 02 WATER OP-ANNUAL DUE RENEWAL 51-000-14-00-1400 297.92 INVOICE TOTAL: 325.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 325.00 513135 BATTERYS BATTERY SERVICE CORPORATION 220170 04/04/12 01 WATER OP-CELL PHONE BATTERY 51-510-54-00-5440 21.56 INVOICE TOTAL: 21.56 * CHECK TOTAL: 21.56 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513136 BCBS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD 040612 04/06/12 01 ADMIN—MAY DENTAL INSURANCE 01-000-14-00-1400 5,056.29 02 PARKS—MAY DENTAL INSURANCE 79-000-14-00-1400 635.09 03 REC—MAY DENTAL INSURANCE 79-000-14-00-1400 262.95 04 WATER OP—MAY DENTAL INSURANCE 51-000-14-00-1400 455.98 05 SEWER OP—MAY DENTAL INSURANCE 52-000-14-00-1400 317.55 06 LIBRARY — MAY DENTAL INSURANCE 82-000-14-00-1400 469.07 07 ADMIN—MAY HEALTH INSURANCE 01-000-14-00-1400 56,349.22 08 PARKS—MAY HEALTH INSURANCE 79-000-14-00-1400 7,242.81 09 REC—MAY HEALTH INSURANCE 79-000-14-00-1400 3,070.48 10 WATER OP—MAY HEALTH INSURANCE 51-000-14-00-1400 5,574.59 11 SEWER OP—MAY HEALTH INSURANCE 52-000-14-00-1400 3,686.14 12 LIBRARY—MAY HEALTH INSURANCE 82-000-14-00-1400 5,100.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 88,221.16 CHECK TOTAL: 88,221.16 513137 CAMBRIA CAMBRIA SALES COMPANY INC. 32284 04/02/12 01 SEWER OP—PAPER TOWEL 52-520-56-00-5620 55.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 55.50 CHECK TOTAL: 55.50 513138 CARGILL CARGILL, INC 2900478580 03/23/12 01 WATER OP—BULK ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,838.84 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,838.84 2900489441 03/30/12 01 WATER OP—BULK ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,897.80 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,897.80 CHECK TOTAL: 5,736.64 513139 CDWG CDW GOVERNMENT INC. n DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513139 CDWG CDW GOVERNMENT INC. H344997 03/20/12 01 POLICE-HP SB REBATE SWITCH 01-210-56-00-5635 242.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 242.99 CHECK TOTAL: 242.99 513140 CENTRALL CENTRAL LIMESTONE COMPANY, INC 15662-C 04/01/12 01 STREETS-GRAVEL 01-410-56-00-5620 706.29 02 WATER OP-GRAVEL 51-510-56-00-5620 1, 187.92 03 LAND CASH-GRAVEL 72-720-60-00-6036 163.52 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,057.73 CHECK TOTAL: 2,057.73 513141 CINTASFP CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 F940011778 03/27/12 01 POLICE-FIRE EXTINGUISHERS FOR 01-210-56-00-5640 750.45 02 BUILDING AND SQUADS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 750.45 CHECK TOTAL: 750.45 513142 COMCAST COMCAST CABLE 032612 03/26/12 01 POLICE-MONTHLY CABLE CHARGES 01-210-56-00-5620 4.17 INVOICE TOTAL: 4.17 CHECK TOTAL: 4.17 513143 COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 0185079109-0312 03/30/12 01 WATER OP-420 FAIRHAVEN 51-510-54-00-5480 125.27 INVOICE TOTAL: 125.27 0435113116-0312 04/04/12 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 89.03 INVOICE TOTAL: 89.03 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 513143 COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 0903040077-0312 03/30/12 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 2,519.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,519.00 0908014004-0312 04/03/12 01 WATER OP-WELLS 51-510-54-00-5480 66.19 INVOICE TOTAL: 66.19 * 0966038077 0312 03/29/12 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 102.46 INVOICE TOTAL: 102.46 * 1183088101-0312 03/28/12 01 SEWER OP-LIFT STATION 52-520-54-00-5480 116.38 INVOICE TOTAL: 116.38 * 1407125045-0312 04/04/12 01 SEWER OP-FOXHILL 7 LIFT 52-520-54-00-5480 89.54 INVOICE TOTAL: 89.54 * 2019099044-0312 04/06/12 01 WATER OP-WELLS 51-510 54-00-5480 80.78 INVOICE TOTAL: 80.78 * 2668047007-0312 03/29/12 01 SEWER OP-1908 RAINTREE RD 52-520-54-00-5480 173.41 INVOICE TOTAL: 173.41 2961017043-0312 03/30/12 01 SEWER OP -LIFT STATION 52-520-54-00-5480 102.38 INVOICE TOTAL: 102.38 4085080033 0312 04/03/12 01 WATER OP-1991CANNONBALL TRAIL 51-510-54-00-5480 231.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 231.50 4449087016-0312 04/06/12 01 SEWER OP-LIFT STATIONS 52-520-54-00-5480 892.07 INVOICE TOTAL: 892.07 4475093053-0312 03/30/12 01 WATER OP-610 TOWER LANE 51-510-54-00-5480 203.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 203.50 6963019021- 0212 03/19/12 01 STREETS LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 33.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 33.10 CHECK TOTAL: 4, 824.61 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 513144 DAVEAUTO DAVID L CHELSEN 19115 04/04/12 01 POLICE ROTORS 01-210-54-00-5495 320.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 320.00 * 19130 04/10/12 01 POLICE SQUAD REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 448.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 448.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 768.00 513145 EDWAWILD EDWARD WILDMAN PALMER LLP 1802032 03/16/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-LOCAL SITING 01-640-54-00-5463 3,431.18 02 ENGAGEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 3,431.18 CHECK TOTAL: 3, 431.18 513146 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 50649 03/20/12 01 DOWNTOWN TIF-KENDALLWOOD 88-880-60-00-6000 5,131.75 02 ESTATES - PUNCHLIST ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 5, 131.75 CHECK TOTAL: 5, 131.75 513147 EJEQUIP EJ EQUIPMENT 0049825 03/30/12 01 STREETS-LINER-SUCTION 01-410-56-00-5640 116.54 02 NOZZLE HEAD ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 116.54 0049924 04/05/12 01 STREETS-SCREWS 01-410-56-00-5640 16.97 INVOICE TOTAL: 16.97 CHECK TOTAL: 133.51 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513148 EXELON EXELON ENERGY 200306900230 04/06/12 01 WATER OP-LIGHTS 51-510-54-00-5480 154.30 INVOICE TOTAL: 154.30 CHECK TOTAL: 154.30 513149 FEDEX FEDEX 7-837-34037 03/28/12 01 COMM/DEV-1 PKG. TO LEXON O1-220-54-00-5452 13.11 02 SURETY GROUP ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 13.11 CHECK TOTAL: 13.11 513150 FIRSTNON FIRST NONPROFIT UNEMPLOYEMENT 122719N-0412 04/01/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-APRIL 2012 FEES 01-640-52-00-5230 7,246.42 02 ADMIN -MAY - JUNE 2012 FEES 01-000-14-00-1400 14,492.83 INVOICE TOTAL: 21,739.25 CHECK TOTAL: 21, 739.25 513151 FLAILMAS NATIONAL PARTS CORPORATION 112824 03/28/12 01 STREETS-STANDARD DUTY BLADES 01-410-54-00-5495 100.64 INVOICE TOTAL: 100.64 * CHECK TOTAL: 100.64 513152 FOXRIDGE FOX RIDGE STONE 2596 04/02/12 01 WATER OP-PEA GRAVEL 51-510-56-00-5620 488.53 INVOICE TOTAL: 488.53 * CHECK TOTAL: 488.53 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513153 GRAINCO GRAINCO FS., INC. 450 03/27/12 01 STREETS-SWEEPER REPAIR 01-410-54-00-5495 75.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 75.00 CHECK TOTAL: 75.00 513154 GROUND GROUND EFFECTS INC. 249672 03/29/12 01 LAND CASH LOT PAVERS 72-720-60-00-6036 2,294.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,294.10 249674 03/29/12 01 LAND CASH-LOT PAVERS 72-720-60-00-6036 2,29.4.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,294.10 249675 03/29/12 01 LAND CASH-LOT PAVERS 72-720-60-00-6036 2,294.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,294.10 249676 03/29/12 01 LAND CASH-LOT PAVERS 72-720-60-00-6036 2,294.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,294.10 249677 03/29/12 01 LAND CASH-LOT PAVERS 72-720-60-00-6036 2,294.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,294.10 249678 03/29/12 01 LAND CASH-LOT PAVERS 72-720-60-00-6036 2,294.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,294.10 249679 03/29/12 01 LAND CASH-LOT PAVERS 72-720-60-00-6036 2,049.64 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,049.64 250198 04/04/12 01 STREETS-SCALE WEIGHT 01-410-56-00-5620 27.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 27.00 250576 04/06/12 01 STREETS-SCALE WEIGHT 01-410-56-00-5620 6.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 6.00 CHECK TOTAL: 15,847.24 n DATE: 04/18/12 UNITER CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 513155 HARRIS HARRIS COMPUTER SYSTEMS XT00003084 03/30/12 01 FINANCE-UTILITY BILLING 01-120-54-00-5462 150.00 02 MODULE ENHANCEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 150.00 * XT00003103 03/31/12 01 FINANCE-UTILITY BILLING MODULE 01-120-54-00-5462 300.00 02 ENHANCEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 450.00 513156 ILLCO ILLCO, INC. 1224280 03/30/12 01 WATER OP PVC UNION 51-510-56-00-5638 10.92 INVOICE TOTAL: 10.92 * 1224360 04/02/12 01 WATER OP PVC PIPE, PVC CHECK 51-510-56-00-5638 61.89 02 VALVE, PVC ADAPTER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 61.89 * CHECK TOTAL: 72.81 513157 INTEGRYS INTEGRYS ENERGY SERVICES, INC 19283467-1 04/02/12 01 WATER OP-2921 BRISTOL RIDGE 51-510-54-00-5480 5,634.23 INVOICE TOTAL: 5,634.23 * 19298459-1 04/03/12 01 WATER OP-WELLS 3 & 4 51-510-54-00-5480 4,110.38 INVOICE TOTAL: 4,110.38 * 19298568-1 04/03/12 01 WATER OP 2224 TREMONT STREET 51-510-54-00-5480 2,645.63 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,645.63 * 19330203-1 04/05/12 01 SEWER OP-420 FAIRHAVEN 52-520-54-00-5480 1,324.52 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,324.52 * CHECK TOTAL: 13, 714.76 In DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513158 IPRF ILLINOIS PUBLIC RISK FUND 5387 04/02/12 01 ADMIN MAY WORKER'S 01-000-14-00-1400 9,451.00 02 COMPENSATION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 9, 451.00 CHECK TOTAL: 9, 451.00 513159 JCM JCM UNIFORMS, INC. 665411 03/27/12 01 POLICE-GOLD STARS 01-210-56-00-5600 22.90 INVOICE TOTAL: 22.90 CHECK TOTAL: 22.90 513160 JIMSTRCK JAMES GRIBBLE 140215 04/05/12 01 STREETS TRUCK INSPECTION 01-410-54-00-5495 29.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 29.00 CHECK TOTAL: 29.00 513161 JOHNSOIL JOHNSON OIL COMPANY IL NP33714545 04/01/12 01 POLICE-GASOLINE 01-210-56-00-5695 831.39 INVOICE TOTAL: 831.39 CHECK TOTAL: 831.39 513162 KCRECORD KENDALL COUNTY RECORD 5865 03/29/12 01 COMM/DEV-CODE ENFORCEMENT 01-220-54-00-5426 98.40 02 DISPLAY ADS ** COMMENT ** 03 FINANCE-COPIER RFP PUBLIC 01-120-54-00-5462 11.20 04 NOTICE ** COMMENT ** 05 ADMIN-SOLID WASTE COLLECTION 01-110-54-00-5426 25.20 „ DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513162 KCRECORD KENDALL COUNTY RECORD 5865 03/29/12 06 RFP PUBLIC NOTICE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 134.80 CHECK TOTAL: 134.80 513163 KENDTREA KENDALL COUNTY TREASURER 12-8 04/09/12 01 ADMIN-1ST BI-ANNUAL 01-110-54-00-5473 11, 775.00 02 CONTRIBUTION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 11,775.00 CHECK TOTAL: 11, 775.00 513164 KENPRINT ANNETTE M. POWELL 18865 04/02/12 01 ADMIN--2,500 WINDOW ENVELOPES 01-110-56-00-5610 187.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 187.60 * CHECK TOTAL: 187.60 513165 KONICAMI KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 220652349 03/30/12 01 POLICE-COPIER CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5430 21.94 INVOICE TOTAL: 21.94 * 220652350 03/30/12 01 ADMIN-COLOR COPIER CHARGES 01-110-54-00-5430 269.76 02 ADMIN-B/W COPIER CHARGES 01-110-54-00-5430 387.33 INVOICE TOTAL: 657.09 * 220652393 03/30/12 01 WATER OP-COPIER CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5430 7.68 INVOICE TOTAL: 7.68 * 220652394 03/30/12 01 POLICE-COPIER CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5430 54.54 INVOICE TOTAL: 54.54 * DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513165 KONICAMI KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 220652395 03/30/12 01 COMM/DEV-COLOR COPIER CHARGES 01-220-54-00-5430 197.16 02 COMM/DEV-B/W COPIER CHARGES 01-220-54-00-5430 41.88 INVOICE TOTAL: 239.04 CHECK TOTAL: 980.29 513166 LINCOLNF LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 040912 04/09/12 01 ADMIN-MAY LIFE INSURANCE 01-000-14-00-1400 348.00 02 PARKS-MAY LIFE INSURANCE 79-000-14-00-1400 58.00 03 REC-MAY LIFE INSURANCE 79-000-14-00-1400 29.00 04 WATER OP-MAY LIFE INSURANCE 51-000-14-00-1400 47.13 05 SEWER OP-MAY LIFE INSURANCE 52-000-14-00-1400 25.38 06 REC CENTER-MAY LIFE INSURANCE 80-000-14-00-1400 7.25 07 LIBRARY-MAY LIFE INSURANCE 82-000-14-00-1400 36.24 INVOICE TOTAL: 551.00 CHECK TOTAL: 551.00 513167 LOCALGOV TIM SCHLONEGER 4272012 03/26/12 01 ADMIN-12 MONTH MEMBERSHIP 01-000-14-00-1400 600.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 600.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 600.00 513168 MCKIRGN RANDY MCKIRGAN 72403 03/13/12 01 STREETS-OIL 01-410-54-00-5495 255.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 255.00 * 72487 03/27/12 01 STREETS-BIO DIESEL 01-410-56-00-5695 1,017.58 02 WATER OP-BIO DIESEL 51-510-56-00-5695 1,017.58 03 SEWER OP-BIO DIESEL 52-520-56-00-5695 1,017.58 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,052.74 CHECK TOTAL: 3,307.74 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513169 MENLAND MENARDS YORKVILLE 54502 01/30/12 01 STREETS—POWER LUBE, INACTIVE 01-410-56-00-5656 13.95 02 JUNO KNOB, CABINET DOOR ROLLER ** COMMENT ** 03 CATCH ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 13.95 * 54547 01/30/12 01 STREETS—MERCHANDISE RETURN 01-410-56-00-5656 10.97 02 CREDIT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: —10.97 * 55015 02/01/12 01 WATER OP—AC VOLTAGE TESTER, 51-510-56-00-5630 13.93 02 GARBAGE BAGS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 13.93 * 66043 03/20/12 01 SEWER OP—PRY BAR SET 52-520-56-00-5630 14.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 14.99 * 68486 03/29/12 01 WATER OP—GATE VALVE, BALL 51-510-56-00-5664 49.97 02 VALVE, POWER LUBE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 44.97 * 68565-12 03/29/12 01 WATER OP—BLADES 51-510-56-00-5630 26.89 INVOICE TOTAL: 26.89 * 69683 04/02/12 01 SEWER OP—CHUNX BUCKET 52-520-56-00-5613 29.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 29.99 * 69858 04/03/12 01 STREETS—NAILS 01-410-56-00-5656 37.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 37.99 * 70190 04/04/12 01 WATER OP—BATTERIES, PENS 51-510-56-00-5620 24.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 24.95 * CHECK TOTAL: 196.69 513170 MERLIN DEYCO, INC. In DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513170 MERLIN DEYCO, INC. 16300 03/27/12 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE 01-210-54-00-5495 29.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 29.95 * 16349 03/30/12 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE, WIPER BLADE 01-210-54-00-5495 46.87 INVOICE TOTAL: 46.87 * 16555 04/10/12 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGES 01-210-54-00-5495 29.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 29.95 * CHECK TOTAL: 106.77 513171 METROWES METRO WEST COG 972 03/30/12 01 ADMIN-03/22 BOARD MEETING FOR 01-110-54-00-5412 52.00 02 2 PEOPLE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 52.00 CHECK TOTAL: 52.00 513172 MIKOLASR RAY MIKOLASEK 032912 03/29/12 01 POLICE-EFFECTIVE POLICE 01-210-54-00-5415 81.21 02 SUPERVISION TRAINING MEAL ** COMMENT ** 03 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 81.21 CHECK TOTAL: 81.21 513173 MJELECT MJ ELECTRICAL SUPPLY, INC. 1127470-00 03/25/12 01 STREETS PHOTOCONTROL 01-410-56-00-5640 150.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 150.00 1127470-01 03/25/12 01 STREETS BULBS 01-410-56-00-5640 240.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 240.00 ti9_ DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: ' 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513173 MJELECT MJ ELECTRICAL SUPPLY, INC. 1127486 00 03/25/12 01 STREETS-TAPE 01-410-56-00-5640 58.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 58.50 * 1127499-00 03/25/12 01 STREETS-BULBS, FUSES 01-410-56-00-5640 58.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 58.00 * 1127499-01 04/02/12 01 STREETS BULBS 01-410-56-00-5640 44.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 44.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 550.50 513174 MUSCO MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING, LLC 233552 03/29/12 01 LAND CASH-MATERIAL FOR TENNIS 72-720-60-00-6036 43,464.00 02 COURT LIGHTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 43,464.00 * 233582 03/30/12 01 LAND CASH-TENNIS COURT LIGHT 72-720-60-00-6036 10,157.40 02 INSTALLATION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10, 157.40 * CHECK TOTAL: 53,621.40 513175 NASALT NORTH AMERICAN SALT COMPANY 70815626 03/23/12 01 MFT-SALT 15-155-56-00-5618 28,945.67 INVOICE TOTAL: 28,945.67 * CHECK TOTAL: 28,945.67 513176 NICOR NICOR GAS 00-41-22-8748 4-0312 04/05/12 01 ADMIN-1107 PRAIRIE LANE 01-110-5400-5480 44.82 INVOICE TOTAL: 44.82 * DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513176 NICOR NICOR GAS 15-63-74-5733 2-0312 04/05/12 01 ADMIN-1955 SOUTH BRIDGE STREET 01-110-54-00-5480 30.23 INVOICE TOTAL: 30.23 * 15-64-61-3532 5-0312 04/05/12 01 ADMIN-1991 CANNONBALL TRAIL 01-110-54-00-5480 29.30 INVOICE TOTAL: 29.30 * 23-45 91-4862 5-0312 04/03/12 01 ADMIN-101 BRUELL STREET 01-110-54-00-5480 80.65 INVOICE TOTAL: 80.65 * 45-12-25-4081 3-0312 04/03/12 01 ADMIN-201 W. HYDRAULIC 01-110-54-00-5480 68.17 INVOICE TOTAL: 68.17 * 46-69-47-6727 1-0312 04/05/12 01 ADMIN-1975 BRIDGE STREET 01-110-54-00-5480 59.14 INVOICE TOTAL: 59.14 * 49-25-61-1000 5-0312 04/03/12 01 ADMIN-1 VAN EMMON 01-110-54-00-5480 68.52 INVOICE TOTAL: 68.52 * CHECK TOTAL: 380.83 513177 OFFWORK OFFICE WORKS 203726 04/03/12 01 ADMIN-PAPER 01-110-56-00-5610 20.76 INVOICE TOTAL: 20.76 * CHECK TOTAL: 20.76 513178 OHERROND RAY O'HERRON COMPANY, INC. 0051397 IN 03/27/12 01 POLICE HAT BADGE 01-210-56-00-5600 59.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 59.95 * 0051398 IN 03/27/12 01 POLICE BELT, BOOTS, HAT BADGE 01-210-56-00-5600 317.75 INVOICE TOTAL: 317.75 * CHECK TOTAL: 377.70 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513179 OMALLEY O'MALLEY WELDING & FABRICATING 14867 03/23/12 01 STREETS-STEEL PLATE 01-410-56-00-5640 25.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 25.00 CHECK TOTAL: 25.00 513180 ORRK KATHLEEN FIELD ORR & ASSOC. 13710 04/03/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-GENERAL CITY 01-640-54-00-5456 2,926.00 02 LEGAL MATTERS ** COMMENT ** 03 ADMIN SERVICES-MEETINGS 01-640-54-00-5456 1,000.00 04 ADMIN-KENDALL MARKETPLACE 01-640-54-00-5456 76.00 05 COMM/DEV-CHALLEY FARM MATTERS, 01-220-54-00-5466 427.50 06 EQUILON ENTERPRISES MATTERS ** COMMENT ** 07 DEVELOPER ESCROW-D 90-037-37-00-0011 978.50 08 CONSTRUCTION MATTERS ** COMMENT ** 09 COUNTRYSIDE TIF-LEGAL MATTERS 87-870-54-00-5420 190.00 10 DOWNTOWN TIF-LEGAL MATTERS 88-880-54-00-5466 95.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 5,693.00 CHECK TOTAL: 5,693.00 513181 PARADISE PARADISE CAR WASH 222319 04/02/12 01 POLICE-MARCH CAR WASHES 01-210-54-00-5495 7.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 7.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 7.00 513182 PATTEN PATTEN INDUSTRIES, INC. P53CO123871 04/02/12 01 SEWER OP-OIL 52-520-56-00-5640 99.40 INVOICE TOTAL: 99.40 * CHECK TOTAL: 99.40 10 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513183 PFPETT P.F. PETTIBONE & CO. 25088 03/30/12 01 ADMIN-2012 CITY COUNCIL MINUTE 01-110-56-00-5610 171.40 02 BOOK ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 171.40 * CHECK TOTAL: 171.40 513184 PHILSTOP PHIL'S TOP SOIL, INC. 26689 03/24/12 01 STREETS-DIRT 01-410-56-00-5620 52.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 52.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 52.50 513185 PRESNAKJ PRESNAK, JAMES 032812 03/28/12 01 POLICE-FBI TRAINING MEETING 01-210-54-00-5415 25.00 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 25.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 25.00 513186 R0000109 JESSE SEXTON 033112 04/05/12 01 ADMIN-BEECHER DEPOSIT REFUND 01-000-24-00-2410 50.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 50.00 513187 R0000594 BRIAN BETZWISER 042312 04/23/12 01 PW CAPITAL-INTEREST PYMT #42 21-000-14-00-1400 4,422.82 02 FOR 185 WOLF STREET ** COMMENT ** 03 PW CAPITAL-PRINCIPLE PYMT #42 21-000-14-00-1400 2,435.10 04 FOR 185 WOLF STREET ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 6,857.92 CHECK TOTAL: 6,857.92 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG !D: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513188 R0001022 STEPHEN LICHT 040912 04/09/12 01 ADMIN-REFUND OF PARKWAY TREE 01-000-24-00-2426 165.00 02 CONTRIBUTION DUE TO HOA ** COMMENT ** 03 PURCHASING TREES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 165.00 CHECK TOTAL: 165.00 513189 R0001023 REBECCA LAFAN-TYSON 033112 04/05/12 01 ADMIN-BEECHER DEPOSIT REFUND 01-000-24-00-2410 270.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 270.00 CHECK TOTAL: 270.00 513190 RATOSJ RATOS, JAMES 021512A-STREBATE 04/10/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-4TH QUARTER 01-640-54-00-5492 3,854.95 02 SALES TAX REBATE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 3,854.95 CHECK TOTAL: 3,854.95 513191 RIVRVIEW RIVERVIEW FORD 106401 04/04/12 01 WATER OP-DOOR REPAIR 51-510-54-00-5495 91.18 INVOICE TOTAL: 91.18 CHECK TOTAL: 91.18 513192 SCHWARTD SCHWARTZKOPF, DON 032912 03/29/12 01 POLICE-FBI MONTHLY TRAINING 01-210-54-00-5415 25.00 02 MEETING FOR 1 PERSON ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 25.00 CHECK TOTAL: 25.00 on_ DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513193 SHARPET TIMOTHY W. SHARPE 041112 04/11/12 01 FINANCE GASB 45 ACTUARIAL 01-120-54-00-5462 2,000.00 02 EVALUATION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 2,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 2,000.00 513194 SHELL SHELL OIL CO. 06515923204-PW 04/05/12 01 STREETS-GASOLINE 01-410-56-00-5695 546.72 02 WATER OP-GASOLINE 51-510-56-00-5695 546.71 03 SEWER OP-GASOLINE 52-520-56-00-5695 546.71 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,640.14 CHECK TOTAL: 1,640.14 513195 SHREDIT SHRED-IT 9400160045-CITY 03/23/12 01 ADMIN-PURGE SHREDDING 01-110-54-00-5462 80.00 02 FINANCE PURGE SHREDDING O1° 120-54-00-5462 140.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 220.00 CHECK TOTAL: 220.00 513196 SOFTWARE SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE 040412 04/04/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-FINAL PAYMENT 01-640-54-00-5462 22,791.00 02 OF REMAINING BALANCE FOR ** COMMENT ** 03 VIRTUALIZATION QUOTE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 22,791.00 040412A 04/04/12 01 POLICE-TAPE LIBRARY FOR 01-210-56-00-5635 5,271.44 02 VIRTUAL SOLUTION ** COMMENT ** 03 POLICE-TAPE LIBRARY FOR 01-210-56-00-5640 7,513.56 04 VIRTUAL SOLUTION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 12,785.00 DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513196 SOFTWARE SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE 410914 04/03/12 01 POLICE-TRAVEL CHARGE 01-210-54-00-5415 25.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 25.00 CHECK TOTAL: 35,601.00 513197 SPEEDWAY SPEEDWAY 1001542438-0312-C 03/26/12 01 POLICE-GASOLINE 01-210-56-00-5695 1,992.63 02 STREETS-GASOLINE 01-410-56-00-5695 474.48 03 WATER OP-GASOLINE 51-510-56-00-5695 474.47 04 SEWER OP-GASOLINE 52-520-56-00-5695 474.47 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,416.05 CHECK TOTAL: 3, 416.05 513198 STATEPOL STATE POLICE SERVICES FUND 040912 04/09/12 01 POLICE-32 HOUR PATROL RIFLE 01-210-54-00-5412 148.57 02 COURSE AND TASER TRAINING FOR ** COMMENT ** 03 1 PERSON ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 148.57 CHECK TOTAL: 148.57 513199 STREICH STREICHERS I918815 04/03/12 01 POLICE-SHIRT 01-210-56-00-5600 60.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 60.99 CHECK TOTAL: 60.99 513200 VEOLIA VEOLIA ES SOLID WASTE MIDWEST T00000767402 03/25/12 01 HEALTH & SANITATION-MARCH 01-540-54-00-5442 98,319.50 nn DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513200 VEOLIA VEOLIA ES SOLID WASTE MIDWEST T00000767402 03/25/12 02 SERVICE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 98,319.50 CHECK TOTAL: 98,319.50 513201 WATERSYS WATER SOLUTIONS UNLIMITED, INC 31284 03/29/12 01 WATER OP-PHOSPHATE 51-510-56-00-5638 2,587.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,587.50 CHECK TOTAL: 2,587.50 513202 WTRPRD WATER PRODUCTS, INC. 0231264 03/26/12 01 WATER OP-BAND REPAIR CLAMP 51-510-56-00-5620 264.93 INVOICE TOTAL: 264.93 CHECK TOTAL: 264.93 513203 YBSD YORKVILLE BRISTOL 040412 04/04/12 01 TRUST & AGENCY-MARCH 2012 95-000-24-00-2450 223,524.98 02 SANITARY FEES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 223,524.98 CHECK TOTAL: 223,524.98 513204 YORKACE YORKVILLE ACE & RADIO SHACK 142348 02/06/12 01 WATER OP-PROPANE REFILL 51-510-56-00-5620 39.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 39.98 * 142418 02/14/12 01 WATER OP-BATTERIES 51-510-56-00-5620 9.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 9.98 * DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 513204 YORKACE YORKVILLE ACE & RADIO SHACK 142446 02/17/12 01 WATER OP-BOLTS 51-510-56-00-5620 3.76 INVOICE TOTAL: 3.76 * 142528 02/23/12 01 WATER OP-BULB 51-510-56-00-5620 5.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 5.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 59.22 513205 YORKCLER YORKVILLE CLERK'S ACCOUNT 153012 03/30/12 01 ADMIN-STIPULATION OF FINAL 01-110-54-00-5462 41.00 02 JUDGEMENT ORDER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 41.00 * 153262 04/11/12 01 WATER OP-RELEASE WATER LIEN 51-510-54-00-5462 98.00 02 DEVELOPER EASROW-ORDINANCE 90-032-32-00-0011 98.00 03 FOR HENNE/FRIEL PROPERTY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 196.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 237.00 513206 YORKGFPC PETTY CASH 041212 04/12/12 01 ADMIN-KLEENEX 01-110-56-00 5610 2.50 02 STREETS-GASOLINE 01-410-56-005695 20.53 INVOICE TOTAL: 23.03 * CHECK TOTAL: 23.03 513207 YORKNAPA YORKVILLE NAPA AUTO PARTS 994436 03/01/12 01 STREETS-BULB 01-410-54-00-5495 14.46 INVOICE TOTAL: 14.46 * 995159 03/07/12 01 STREETS-AIR FILTERS, OIL 01-410-54-00-5495 203.26 _9d_ DATE: 04/18/12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24 TIME: 08:58:38 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 04/24/12 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 513207 YORKNAPA YORKVILLE NAPA AUTO PARTS 995159 03/07/12 02 FILTERS, FUEL FILTERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 203.26 * 995246 03/08/12 01 STREETS-BULB, SERVICE JACK 01-410-56-00-5630 281.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 281.00 * 995584 03/12/12 01 STREETS-OIL FILTERS 01-410-54-00-5495 19.59 INVOICE TOTAL: 19.59 * 995913 03/14/12 01 WATER OP-BRAKE PADS, ROTORS 51-510-54-00-5495 277.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 277.99 * 996218 03/16/12 01 WATER OP-WIPER BLADE 51-510-54-00-5495 9.84 INVOICE TOTAL: 9.84 * 997183 03/23/12 01 STREETS-FUSE 01-410-56-00-5656 2.49 INVOICE TOTAL: 2.49 * CHECK TOTAL: 808.63 513208 YOUNGM MARLYS J. YOUNG 031412 04/02/11 01 ADMIN-MARCH 14 PLAN COMMISSION 01-110-54-00-5462 6.67 02 MEETING MINUTES ** COMMENT ** 03 DEVELOPER ESCROW-D 90-037-37-00-0011 59.98 04 CONSTRUCTION SPECIAL USE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 66.65 CHECK TOTAL: 66.65 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 664,430.32 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY 4/13/2012 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS ADMINISTRATION $ 9,828.59 $ - $ 9,828.59 $ 947.47 $ 698.10 $ 11,474.16 FINANCE 6,406.13 - 6,406.13 646.47 504.19 7,556.79 POLICE 75,561.80 1,955.87 77,517.67 435.74 5,702.25 83,655.66 COMMUNITY DEV. 6,712.50 - 6,712.50 647.08 496.56 7,856.14 STREETS 9,688.27 - 9,688.27 933.95 718.88 11,341.10 WATER 12,976.24 80.54 13,056.78 1,258.68 960.95 15,276.41 SEWER 7,106.63 - 7,106.63 685.07 529.31 8,321.01 PARKS 16,056.81 - 16,056.81 1,562.34 1,207.34 18,826.49 RECREATION 9,089.83 - 9,089.83 858.82 656.04 10,604.69 REC. CENTER 7,119.51 - 7,119.51 454.27 552.43 8,126.21 LIBRARY 16,340.65 - 16,340.65 901.66 1,222.97 18,465.28 TOTALS $ 176,886.96 $ 2,036.41 $ 178,923.37 $ 9,331.55 $ 13,249.02 $ 201,503.94 TOTAL PAYROLL $ 201,503.94 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL BILL LIST SUMMARY Tuesday, April 24, 2012 PAYROLL DATE BI-WEEKLY 4/13/2012 $201 ,503.94 TOTAL PAYROLL $201,503.94 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BILLS LIST 4/24/2012 $664,430.32 MANUAL BILL LIST - YORKVILLE POST OFFICE 4/11/2012 $378.93 TOTAL BILLS PAID $664,809.25 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $866,313.19 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 6 Legal ❑ CA#2 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ■ -- City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ PW 2012-25 Police ALE ��' Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Game Farm Road/ Somonauk Improvements Engineering Agreement Meeting and Date: City Council - April 24, 2012 Synopsis: Engineering Agreement Consideration Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: *.ID CI p` .0 Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator EST. �sss From: Brad Sanderson, EEI oas,] CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works .p I S.a' p Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. 1•� �,� Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk LLB ��• Date: April 13, 2012 Subject: Game Farm/ Somonauk Improvements The purpose of this memo is to provide an update as to the status of land acquisition as well as to note the next set of action items. Currently the City has acquired eight (8) parcels out of the necessary 33 needed prior to construction — See attached summary. In order to keep the project on target for the planned November 2014 letting, it is recommended that the City continue with the land acquisition process. If you recall, land acquisition is being funded with STP and MFT funds (50150). The next steps in the process are as follows: 1. New title commitments are needed along with updating the premise plats since the original ones are greater than one (1) year old. A proposal from HR Green is attached for performing those tasks. Work is to be, paid for out of the MFT account and has been previously appropriated by the City and IDOT. 2. Upon conclusion of the work from HR Green, Jay Heap (land acquisition specialist) will provide a new proposal to complete the acquisition of the remaining parcels. This proposal should be expected at the May or June Public Works Committee Meeting. At this time, we ask that the Public Works Committee consider approving the HR Green proposal so that the project can remain on schedule. If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know. Game Fairm/Somonauk-ROW&Easement Costs 12/27/11 Acquired Parcels Appraised Value Offered Value Amount Parcel Address Owner Type ROW Temp.Esmt.(3 vrs) Total Remarks ROW Temp Esmt(6 vrsl Offered Agreed Prirtre 1 108 E.Somonauk Hight TE $0 $2,200 $2,200 Acquired $0 $4,400 $4,400 $4,400 2 106 E.Somonauk Wheeler TE $0 $2,200 $2,200 Acquired $0 $4,400 $4,400 $4,400 3 104 E.Somonauk Afars,Hyde TE $0 $800 $800 Acquired $0 $1,600 $1,600 $1,600 4 102 E.Somonauk Buckner ROW $0 $0 $0[DOT to acquire 5 101 E.Somonauk Steinke ROW&TE $0 $0 $0 IDOT to acquire 6 601 N.Bridge Reinboldt ROW $0 $0 $0 IDOT to acquire 7 104 W.Somonauk WMSY Properties,LLC TE $0 $3,200 $3,200 Acquired $0 $6,400 $6,400 $6,400 8 106 W.Somonauk McCoy TE $0 $2,000 $2,000 Acquired $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 16 n/a ParkviewFdn. TE $0 $500 $500 Acquired $0 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 19 503 Game Farm Sullivan ROW $5,100 $0 $5,100 Acquired $5,100 $5,100 $5,100 28 1205 Game Farm Gallaino,Studer ROW $16,500 $0 $16,500 Acquired $16,500 $16,500 $16,500 Parcels to be Acquired Appraised Value Offered Value Amount Parcel Address Owner Type ROW Tenwlp.Esmt.(3 viral Total Remarks ROW Temp Esmt(6 yrs) Offered Agreed Price 9 105 W.Somonauk Wirth ROW $2,825 $0 $2,825 $2,825 $2,825 10 n/a Loftus ROW $4,665 $0 $4,665 Tower Lane $4,665 $4,665 11 n/a School Dist. ROW $0 $0 $0 Conveyance from school district $0 $0 12 203 W.Somonauk Hausler TE $0 $500 $500 $0 $1,000 $1,000 13 205 W.Somonauk Minick TE $0 $500 $500 $0 $1,000 $1,000 14 406 W.Somonauk Berard TE $0 $3,200 $3,200 $0 15 405 West Street Angle ROW&TE $7,000 $4,200 $11,200 $7,000 $7,000 17 403 W.Somonauk McNelis ROW $16,614 $0 $16,614 $16,614 $16,614 18 501 Game Farm Heiman ROW $3,100 $0 $3,100 $3,100 $3,100 20 n/a Cemetary ROW&TE $15,000 $300 $15,300 $15,000 $600 $15,600 21 n/a Conover ROW $10,700 $0 $10,700 Just north of high school $10,700 $10,700 22 997 Game Farm Conover ROW $16,400 $0 $16,400 $16,400 $16,400 23 n/a Lies,Fisher,Conover ROW&TE $3,300 $2,800 $6,100 Conover Lane $3,300 $3,300 24 1011 Game Farm Knell ROW $14,000 $0 $14,000 $14,000 $14,000 25 n/a Knell ROW $4,600 $0 $4,600 Private Road $4,600 $4,600 26 1105 Game Farm Morris ROW $12,500 $0 $12,500 $12,500 $12,500 27 1201 Game Farm Kleinwachter ROW $19,600 $0 $19,600 $19,600 $19,600 29 1204 Game Farm Witt TE $0 $4,200 $4,200 $0 30 1206 Game Farm Damato TE $0 $2,200 $2,200 $0 31 1211 Game Farm Kritzberg G ROW&TE $22,400 $300 $22,700 $22,400 $600 $23,000 32 1217 Game Farm Kritzberg S ROW $8,000 $0 $8,000 valued as commercial property $8,000 $8,000 33 1308 Game Farm Elite Yorkville LLC ROW&TE $45,400 $60,200 $105,600 Nursing Home _$,15,400 $45,400 _ Totals $227,704 $25,000 $252,704 $43,400 City Cost @ 50% $113,852 $12,500 $126,352 Total paid to date $43 400 Note: $175,000 STP Funds Available($350,000 Total) - Municipality L Name Yorkville O #01S I HR Green, Inc. C Of Township A S Address Bristol L Preliminary Engineering U 651 Prairie Pointe Drive County A Services Agreement L city G For T Kendall Yorkville E Motor Fuel Tax Funds A N Section C T state 03-00031-GO-FP Y Illinois THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of between the above Local Agency(LA)and Consultant(ENGINEER)and covers certain professional engineering services in connection with the improvement of the above SECTION. Motor Fuel Tax Funds, allotted to the LA by the State of Illinois under the general supervision of the State Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the"DEPARTMENT', will be used entirely or in part to finance ENGINEERING services as described under AGREEMENT PROVISIONS. Section Description Name Somonauk Street and Game Farm Road Route FAU 1550 Length 1.04 Mi. 5500.4 FT (Structure No. ) Termini U.S. Route 34 and Illinois Route 71 Description: Preparation of Plat of Highways for the reconstruction of Game Farm Road/Somonauk Street from U.S. Route 34 to Illinois Route 47. Agreement Provisions The Engineer Agrees, 1. To perform or be responsible for the performance of the.following engineering services for the LA, in connection with the proposed improvements herein before described, and checked below: a. ® Make such detailed surveys as are necessary for the preparation of detailed roadway plans b. ❑ Make stream and flood plain hydraulic surveys and gather high water data,and flood histories for the preparation of detailed bridge plans. c. ❑ Make or cause to be made such soil surveys or subsurface investigations including borings and soil profiles and analyses thereof as may be required to furnish sufficient data for the design of the proposed improvement. Such investigations are to be made in accordance with the current requirements of the DEPARTMENT. d. ❑ Make or cause to be made such traffic studies and counts and special intersection studies as may be required to furnish sufficient data for the design of the proposed improvement. e. ❑ Prepare Army Corps of Engineers Permit, Department of Natural Resources-Office of Water Resources Permit, Bridge waterway sketch,and/or Channel Change sketch, Utility plan and locations, and Railroad Crossing work agreements. f. ❑ Prepare Preliminary Bridge design and Hydraulic Report,(including economic analysis of bridge or culvert types) and high water effects on roadway overflows and bridge approaches. g. ❑ Make complete general and detailed plans, special provisions, proposals and estimates of cost and furnish the LA with five(5)copies of the plans, special provisions, proposals and estimates. Additional copies of any or all documents, if required, shall be furnished to the LA by the ENGINEER at his actual cost for reproduction. h. ® Furnish the LA with survey and drafts in quadruplicate of all necessary right-of-way dedications, construction easement and borrow pit and channel change agreements including prints of the corresponding plats and staking as required. Note: Four copies to be submitted to the Regional Engineer Printed 4/11/2012 Page 1 of 4 BLR 05510(Rev.11/06) i. ❑ Assist the LA in the tabulation and interpretation of the contractors' proposals j. ❑ Prepare the necessary environmental documents in accordance with the procedures adopted by the DEPARTMENT's Bureau of Local Roads&Streets. k. ❑ Prepare the Project Development Report when required by the DEPARTMENT. (2) That all reports, plans, plats and special provisions to be furnished by the ENGINEER pursuant to the AGREEMENT,will be in accordance with current standard specifications and policies of the DEPARTMENT. It is being understood that all such reports, plats, plans and drafts shall, before being finally accepted, be subject to approval by the LA and the DEPARTMENT. (3) To attend conferences at any reasonable time when requested to do so by representatives of the LA or the Department. (4) In the event plans or surveys are found to be in error during construction of the SECTION and revisions of the plans or survey corrections are necessary,the ENGINEER agrees that he will perform such work without expense to the LA, even though final payment has been received by him. He shall give immediate attention to these changes so there will be a minimum delay to the Contractor. (5) That basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations and other data prepared or obtained by the Engineer pursuant to this AGREEMENT will be made available, upon request, to the LA or the DEPARTMENT without cost and without restriction or limitations as to their use. (6) That all plans and other documents furnished by the ENGINEER pursuant to this AGREEMENT will be endorsed by him and will show his professional seal where such is required by law. The LA Agrees, 1. To pay the ENGINEER as compensation for all services performed as stipulated in ATTACHMENT A , li 6 and F ;n -ae r nce,wl+ rthe-#eilowing methods a. F0 s a nM nr i +I}r + f th d t E f f the prn ricer! v �'�'sf°C+`t° m �vA�o*RF4C'vrSQCTJT-n�.�....,�.... �'Ni�v .ePi r}tar3 approved-by-the-DEPART rE-�ir b A r of rant of the aFded r R#a + opes id.impmyemeni as apprr..,r "';ertijr--egl�al-#o-t#�e-pe:�.,..... ..,......w..,.,., ..r.....�.,.,c�lst-€er-�ttae-pr ^d•#y t,hp QF='P �7TlldC�I_`1" teacart on tt, F..11..,.'". FhE 'IE' t Schedule for Percentages Based on Awarded Contract Cost Awarded Cost Percentage Fees Under $50,000 (see note) Note: Not necessarily a percentage. Could use per diem, cost-plus or lump sum. 2. - se, Ges-,&toufated in paragraphs 1b, 16, 1d, 1e, 1f, th, 1T AGREES a!@Gt al performing such work plus t9 Gave;p fit, e4erhead and readiness t9 efined as miate4al to+ha n1 619GUFity and r-etirernerit�d edFVtBn � elRC-and Gt4er-� f_nnke — expenses-wilb t �AtY IAfCCOtatE6aI GUSt— ub;� ++n+ra �I ,�+I,o I A +w� �e Ir�tlyEyr . iftheEWGINEER ublet"M n part of th;e , U +F. f A I n ltil t :, �,, �;, y # est tole-€kGINE-EFL ples a F;e nce charge "Coost-tG,En ineer"to be yer'fled h..f n5;sh e-LA r{+h rlE-.PA-PJMGP!T- o f i�"yviGe 400 the FtY r�f g �F1Q-tl'1 -+-+-c'�i-rc�-crsc�v c�� ixpi2�ni � car®-p�azzraC3i{3g-the snoerE he s4assi-kat;ona ar the employ used iR the oFk should h$lionsisstnn#with the emnleyee nln ifie tkm for the .�r,sl-o�-.jGe --Ped�rFfleE#--It-tl�e-per.� .. l-1 tk,a fi. ..iu rl i.,..ti.r. ®-rincfpr�l E-f-}gFF��-r Fe'�e••.••d�-trhicis hGul -RoFF1-}ca"e--Pc.frt.r.. 4 ky Ir, eery sa led per C the g art f.-, r.h r�,-wi�c�kalI h ;ova emote bllt -i.�f17f-ne�}5k#r�ti��..¢°crhrt,�-t'+orscy4�''f7aar"{�- Printed 4/11/2012 Page 2 of 4 BLR 05510(Rev.11106) 3. That payments due the ENGINEER for services rendered in accordance with this AGREEMENT will be made as soon as practicable after the services have been performed in accordance with the following schedule: a. Upon completion of detailed plans, special provisions, proposals and estimate of cost-being the work required by paragraphs 1a through 1g under THE ENGINEER AGREES-to the satisfaction of the LA and their approval by the DEPARTMENT, 90 percent of the total fee due under this AGREEMENT based on the approved estimate of cost. b. Upon award of the contract for the improvement by the LA and its approval by the DEPARTMENT, 100 percent of the total fee due under the AGREEMENT based on the awarded contract cost, less any amounts paid under"a" above. By Mutual agreement, partial payments, not to exceed 90 percent of the amount earned, may be made from t'me to time as the work progresses. That, should the impi;Gyemen clone.+of a y time.r...after the FAIf_IWV=FI�hac_n any part of the cnprinan 4. #-be er#c+rrt�d- provided far iR g;aphE !a,through 1h and n r to the-GG1 1P18-VGR of sueh sewiees, the LA shall r. iFRh .-„ pie lr Ai('_IAiFGC]far .I�u- aa� sfl-S percent-1 rn.-1 ..to#ha Fimc.ho is nntifi.°+.°F ir+ .r:.{i..n of eu nh -�abandeara�ent =an - s ira�paragraph 2 of 7'1 I .+ I A r nhapae ip.apse of tha dt#A 6 t' atea �;� ,-s#at�ald-t€a mss--spec Fcatit�� .. pumuant e pa paphh 4 of --ru. €t GINS--iR V,-RFF=s,af4er they have been appF9ved bobeDEPAR.. NT-, t.-,—��ii pay the.EW INE-E- or—such charm-o;t t perGen-t-#„ r„fi+ n eFhead-and read� ! �serve aGt lal Gost def'Aed as _ n_F2Ph 2 f THF= 1 ❑ ❑r_QG�c If-i-S-kfFld @r �[�2S”-�S —used in this p r-agraph shalt;. the FNrralAlFl=ta ;.pons_ibility+-to-pr�+pletrr-axed-adequate It is Mutually Agreed, 1. That any difference between the ENGINEER and the LA concerning their interpretation of the provisions of this Agreement shall be referred to a committee of disinterested parties consisting of one member appointed by the ENGINEER, one member appointed by the LA and a third member appointed by the two other members for disposition and that the committee's decision shall be final. 2. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by the LA upon giving notice in writing to the ENGINEER at his last known post office address. Upon such termination,the ENGINEER shall cause to be delivered to the LA all surveys, permits, agreements, preliminary bridge design&hydraulic report, drawings,specifications, partial and completed estimates and data, if any from traffic studies and soil survey and subsurface investigations with the understanding that all such material becomes the property of the LA. The ENGINEER shall be paid for any services completed and any services partially completed in accordance with Section 4 of THE LA AGREES. 3. That if the contract for construction has not been awarded one year after the acceptance of the plans by the LA and their approval by the DEPARTMENT,the LA will pay the ENGINEER the balance of the engineering fee due to make 100 percent of the total fees due under this AGREEMENT, based on the estimate of cost as prepared by the ENGINEER and approved by the LA and the DEPARTMENT. 4. That the ENGINEER warrants that he/she has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the ENGINEER, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he/she has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the ENGINEER,any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For Breach or violation of this warranty the LA shall have the right to annul this contract without liability. Printed 4/1 112 01 2 Page 3 of 4 8 L 05510(Rev.11/06) w " h IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have caused the AGREEMENT to be executed in quadruplicate counterparts, each of which shal l be considered as an original by their duly authorized officers. .Executed by the LA: of the (M unicipalitylTownsh i p/Cou nty) ATTEST: State of Illinois, acting by and through its By Clerk By (Seal) Title Executed by the ENGINEER: HR Green, Inc. 651 Prairie Pointe Drive,Suite 201 ATTE Yorkville, Illinois 60560 By By V UV Title Administrative Assistant Title lox-2'e'9 Approved Date Department of Transportation Regional Unginecr Printed 4/11/2012 Page 4 of 4 BLR 05510(Rev.11/06) Attachment A HRGreen Srmpe Sco Short Forr ,Agreerren# Project: Game Farm Road Plat of Highways Project No: 88120061 Land Surveying Services Phase No(s).: Date: 04-11-12 Client: United City of Yorkville Contact: Brad Sanderson, P.E. Title: EEI Vice President Address: 800 Game Farm Road City/State/Zip: Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Phone/Fax No. 630-553-8545/553-7575 The CLIENT agrees to employ HR Green, Inc. (COMPANY)to perform the following services: HRG will revise the Plat of Highways for Game Farm Road, in the United City of Yorkville, and complete the plats for submittal to IDOT. These revisions will be completed based on updated title commitments to be provided by Wheatland Title Company, as well as reflecting changes to various parcels due to the timespan from the previous submittal to the current date. HRG will also monument the acquisition parcels once the acquisition is complete. The CLIENT agrees to pay COMPANY for the above scope of services: Lump Sum in the amount of$9,500.00 ® Reimbursable Expenses Included copy To: �[ Accounting Short Form Agreement Game Farm Road Plat of Highways April 11, 2012 Page 2 of 3 Services provided by COMPANY under this Agreement will be performed in a manner consistent with that degree of care and shill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing at the same time and in the same or similar locality. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with or a cause of action in favor of a third party against either the CLIENT or the COMPANY. COMPANY s services under this Agreement are being performed solely for the CLIENT's benefit, and no other party or entity shall have any claim against COMPANY because of this Agreement or the performance or nonperformance of services hereunder. The CLIENT and COMPANY agree to require a similar provision in all contracts with contractors,subcontractors,subconsultents,vendors and other entities involved in this project to carry out the intent of this provision. In an effort to resolve any conflicts that arise during the design or construction of the project or following the completion of the project,the CLIENT and COMPANY agree that al[disputes between them arising out of or relating to this +lreement shall be submitted to non-binding mediation unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. The CLIENT and COMPANY further agree to include a similar mediation provision in all agreements with independent contractors and consultants retained for the project and to require all independent contractors and consultants also to include a similar mediation provision in all agreements with subcontractors,sub-consultants,suppliers or fabricators so retained,thereby providing for mediation as the primary method for dispute resolution between the parties to those agreements. If litigation arises for purposes of collecting fees or expenses due under this Agreement,the Court in such litigation shall award reasonable costs and expenses, including attorney fees,to the party justly entitled thereto. In awarding attorney fees,the Court shall not be bound by any Court fee schedule, but shall, in the interest of justice,award the full amount of costs,expenses,and attomey fees paid or incurred in good faith. All reports, plans, specifications,field data,field notes, laboratory test data,calculations,estimates and other documents including all documents on electronic media prepared by COMPANY as instruments of service shall remain the property of COMPANY. All project documents including, but not limited to, plans and specifications fumished by COMPANY under this project are intended for use on this project only. Any reuse,without specific written verification or adoption by COMPANY,shall be at the CLIENT's sole risk,and CLIENT shall defend,indemnify and hold harmless COMPANY from all claims,damages and expenses including attomey`s fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Under no circumstances shall delivery of electronic files for use by the CLIENT be deemed a sale by the COMPANY,and the COMPANY makes no warranties, either express or implied, of merchantability and fitness for any particular purpose. In no event shall the COMPANY be liable for indirect or consequential damages as a result of the CLIENT's use or reuse of the electronic files. Because electronic file information can be easily altered, corrupted, or modified by other parties, either intentionally or inadvertently, without notice or indication, COMPANY reserves the right to remove itself from of its ownership and/or involvement in the material from each electronic medium not held in its possession. CLIENT shall retain copies of the work-: performed by COMPANY in electronic form only for information and use by CLIENT for the specific purpose for which COMPANY was engaged. Said material shall not be used by CLIENT or transferred to any other party, for use in other projects, additions to this project, or any other purpose for which the material was not strictly intended by COMPANY without COMPANY's expressed written permission. Any unauthorized use or reuse or modifications of this material shall be at CLIENT'S sole risk. Furthermore, the CLIENT agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold COMPANY harmless from all claims, injuries,damages, tosses,expenses,and attorney's fees arising out of the modification or reuse of these materials. The CLIENT agrees that the General Contractor is solely responsible for job site safety,and warrants that this intent shall be made evident in the CLIENT's Agreement with the General Contractor. The CLIENT also agrees that the CLIENT, COMPANY and COMPANY's consultants shall be indemnified and shall be made additional insureds on the General Contractor's and all subcontractor's general liability policies on a primary and non-contributory basis. The CLIENT shall make no claim for professional negligence, either directly or in a third party claim, against COMPANY unless the CLIENT has first provided COMPANY with a written certification executed by an independent design professional currently practicing in the same discipline as COMPANY and licensed in the State in which the claim arises. The CLIENT agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to limit the liability of COMPANY and COMPANY's officers, directors, partners, employees, shareholders, owners and subconsultants to the CLIENT for any and all claims, losses, costs, damages of any nature whatsoever or claims expenses from any cause or causes, including attorneys'fees and costs and expert witness fees and costs, so that the total aggregate liability of COMPANY and its officers, directors, partners, employees, shareholders, owners and subconsultants to all those named shall not exceed $ 10,000. It is intended that this limitation apply to any and all liability or cause of action however alleged or arising, unless otherwise prohibited by law. Short Form Agreement Game Farm Road Plat of Highways April 11; 2012 Page 3 of 3 Invoices for COMPANY's services shall be submitted, on a monthly basis. Invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt. If any invoice is not paid within 15 days,COMPANY may,w'=trout waiving any claim or right against the CLIENT, and without liability whatsoever to the CLIENT suspend or terminate the performance of services. The retainer shall be credited on the final invoice. Accounts unpaid 30 days after the invoice date may be subject to a monthly service charge of 1.5% (or the maximum legal rate)on the unpaid balance. In the event any portion of an account remains unpaid 60 days after the billing, COMPANY may institute collection action and the CLIENT shall pay all costs of collection,including reasonable attorney's fees. This agreement is approved and accepted by the CLIENT and COMPANY upon both parties signing and dating the agreement. Work will not begin until COMPANY receives a signed agreement. The effective date of the agreement shall be the last date entered below. HR GREEN, INC. 651 Prairie Pointe Drive United City of Yorkville Yorkville, Illinois 60560 630-553-7560 Accepted by: Project Manager: Printed/ Printed/ Typed Name: Brad Sanderson, P.E. Typed Name: Craig Duy Title: EEI Vice President Date: Aril 11, 2012 Date: \\hrgyvnas\Data\88120061\Proposal\pro-041112.doc Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 606 Legal ❑ CA#3 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ■ -- City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ PW 2012-26 Police ALE ��' Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Safe Routes to School Engineering Agreement Meeting and Date: City Council - April 24, 2012 Synopsis: Engineering Agreement Consideration Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator EST. -� -- '$s6 From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works 0.p �! In� ,a p` Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. � 411. ��,�� Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation It E Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: April 13, 2012 Subject: Safe Routes to School The purpose of this memo is to provide an update as to the status of the project. Recently, the City was notified that our request for the scope modifications and additional funds were approved (see attached IDOT letter). Our proposed project now cor_sists of the areas shown in the attached exhibit. Accordingly, the City is now able to proceed with the preparation of the design plans and specifications in preparation of letting and constructing the project. Our target letting date is September 21, 2012, which means the pre-final plans are due June 8, 2012. Attached you will also find for consideration our engineering agreement to provide Phase I and Phase II design engineering services. At this point in time, we are anticipating that the Phase I process will consist of a Categorical Exclusion, Group 1 with no report. If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know. .aGIN L° Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Highways/Region 2/District 3 700 East Norris Drive/Ottawa, Illinois!61350-0697 Telephone 815/434-6131 March 30, 2012 Mr. Bart Olson City Administrator 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Safe Routes to School City of Yorkville Section 10-00040-00-SW Project# SRTS-4009(047) Contract# P40-069-09 Dear Mr. Olson: Please be advised that the scope change request submitted via email to Roger Blakley, and dated March 23, 2012, has been reviewed and approved. Approved also with this scope change, is $49,000.00 in additional funding, bringing the total project cost to $280,000.00. Please proceed with the preliminary plans for the project. Any questions, please contact Roger Blakley at 815-434-8495. Sincerely, Eric S. Therkildsen, P.E. Acting Deputy Director of Highways Region Two Engineer J �f Bji: James R. Threadgill III, P.E. Project Implementation Engineer cc: Brad Sanderson, EEI �- Local Agency Consultant United City of Yorkville L Illinois Department Engineering Enterprises, Inc. p of Transportation C County C O Address Kendall A N 52 Wheeler Road _ Section L S City 10-00040-00-SW U Sugar Grove Project No. A Preliminary Engineering L State 4 Services Agreement Illinois Job No. E For A Zip Code Non-Federal Participation 60554 Contact Name/Phone/E-mail Address N N Contact Name/Phone/E-mail Address Bart Olson C T Bradley P. Sanderson, P.E. City Administrator Y Vice President bolson(5vorkvi Ile.il.us bsanderson eeiweb.com THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2012 between the above Local Agency(LA)and Consultant(ENGINEER)and covers certain professional engineering services in connection with the PROJECT. Non-Federal-aid funds allotted to the 1 A-4}ti . N6 URdeF the geReFal 6UPeFVi6jGn of the 1111;e epa et o Tra GR (CTS will be used entirely or in part to finance engineering services as described under AGREEMENT PROVISIONS. Project Description Name Safe Routes to School Route N/A Length 6,000' Structure No. N/A Termini (See attached exhibit) Description Design of new PCC sidewalk and PCC removal and replacement at various locations throughout the City. See attached exhibit for exact locations. Agreement Provisions I. THE ENGINEER AGREES, 1. To perform or be responsible for the performance, in accordance with STATE approved design standards and policies, of engineering services for the LA for the proposed improvement herein described. 2. To attend any and all meetings and visit the site of the proposed improvement at any reasonable time when requested by representatives of the LA or STATE. 3. To complete the services herein described within 365 calendar days from the date of the Notice to Proceed from the LA, excluding from consideration periods of delay caused by circumstances beyond the control of the ENGINEER. 4. The classifications of the employees used in the work should be consistent with the employee classifications and estimated man- hours shown in EXHIBIT A. If higher-salaried personnel of the firm, including the Principal Engineer, perform services that are indicated in Exhibit A to be performed by lesser-salaried personnel,the wage rate billed for such services shall be commensurate with the payroll rate for the work performed. 5. That the ENGINEER is qualified technically and is entirely conversant with the design standards and policies applicable for the PROJECT; and that the ENGINEER has sufficient properly trained, organized and experienced personnel to perform the services enumerated herein. 6. That the ENGINEER shall be responsible for the accuracy of the work and shall promptly make necessary revisions or corrections resulting from the ENGINEER's errors, omissions or negligent acts without additional compensation. Acceptance of work by the STATE will not relieve the ENGINEER of the responsibility to make subsequent correction of any such errors or omissions or for clarification of any ambiguities. 7. That all plans and other documents furnished by the ENGINEER pursuant to this AGREEMENT will be endorsed by the ENGINEER and will affix the ENGINEER's professional seal when such seal is required by law. Plans for structures to be built as a part of the improvement will be prepared under the supervision of a registered structural engineer and will affix structural engineer seal when such seal is required by law. It will be the ENGINEER's responsibility to affix the proper seal as required by the Bureau of Local Roads and Streets manual published by the STATE. 8. That the ENGINEER will comply with applicable federal statutes, state of Illinois statutes, and local laws or ordinances of the LA. Page 1 of 5 BLR 05610(Rev.9/06) Printed on 4/12/2012 11:3958 AM 9. The undersigned certifies neither the ENGINEER nor I have: a. employed or retained for commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee or other considerations, any firm or person(other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above ENGINEER)to solicit or secure this AGREEMENT, b. agreed,as an express or implied condition for obtaining this AGREEMENT,to employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out the AGREEMENT or c. paid, or agreed to pay any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above ENGINEER)any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of any kind for,or in connection with, procuring or carrying out the AGREEMENT. d. are not presently debarred,suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency, e. have not within a three-year period preceding the AGREEMENT been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain or performing a public (Federal, State or local)transaction;violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement,theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements or receiving stolen property, f. are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State or local)with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (e)and g. have not within a three-year period preceding this AGREEMENT had one or more public transactions(Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. 10. To pay its subconsultants for satisfactory performance no later than 30 days from receipt of each payment from the LA. 11. To submit all invoices to the LA within one year of the completion of the work called for in this AGREEMENT or any subsequent Amendment or Supplement. 12. To submit BLR 05613, Engineering Payment Report, to the STATE upon completion of the project(Exhibit B). 13. Scope of Services to be provided by the ENGINEER: ❑ Make such detailed surveys as are necessary for the planning and design of the PROJECT. ❑ Make stream and flood plain hydraulic surveys and gather both existing bridge upstream and downstream high water data and flood flow histories. ❑ Prepare applications for U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Permit, Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Water Resources Permit and Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Section 404 Water Quality Certification. ❑ Design and/or approve cofferdams and superstructure shop drawings. ❑ Prepare Bridge Condition Report and Preliminary Bridge Design and Hydraulic Report, (including economic analysis of bridge or culvert types and high water effects on roadway overflows and bridge approaches). ❑ Prepare the necessary environmental and planning documents including the Project Development Report, Environmental Class of Action Determination or Environmental Assessment, State Clearinghouse, Substate Clearinghouse and all necessary environmental clearances. ❑ Make such soil surveys or subsurface investigations including borings and soil profiles as may be required to furnish sufficient data for the design of the proposed improvement. Such investigations to be made in accordance with the current Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Bureau of Local Roads and Streets Administrative Policies, Federal-Aid Procedures for Local Highway Improvements or any other applicable requirements of the STATE. ❑ Analyze and evaluate the soil surveys and structure borings to determine the roadway structural design and bridge foundation. ® Prepare preliminary roadway and drainage structure plans and meet with representatives of the LA and STATE at the site of the improvement for review of plans prior to the establishment of final vertical and horizontal alignment, location and size of drainage structures, and compliance with applicable design requirements and policies. ❑ Make or cause to be made such traffic studies and counts and special intersection studies as may be required to furnish sufficient data for the design of the proposed improvement. ® Complete the general and detailed plans, special provisions and estimate of cost. Contract plans shall be prepared in accordance with the guidelines contained in the Bureau of Local Roads and Streets manual. The special provisions and detailed estimate of cost shall be furnished in quadruplicate. ❑ Furnish the LA with survey and drafts in quadruplicate all necessary right-of-way dedications, construction easements and borrow pit and channel change agreements including prints of the corresponding plats and staking as required. Page 2 of 5 BLR 05610(Rev 9/06) Printed on 4/12/2012 9:2928 AM 11. THE LA AGREES, 1. To furnish the ENGINEER all presently available survey data and information 2. To pay the ENGINEER as compensation for all services rendered in accordance with this AGREEMENT, on the basis of the following compensation formulas: Cost Plus Fixed Fee ❑ CPFF= 14.5%[DL+R(DL) +OH(DL) + IHDC], or ❑ CPFF= 14,5%[DL+R(DL) + 1.4(DL)+ IHDC], or ❑ CPFF= 14.5%[(2.3+ R)DL+ IHDC] Where: DL= Direct Labor IHDC = In House Direct Costs OH =Consultant Firm's Actual Overhead Factor R =Complexity Factor Specific Rate ❑ (Pay per element) Lump Sum ® $25,000 3. To pay the ENGINEER using one of the following methods as required by 49 CFR part 26 and 605 ILCS 5/5-409'. ❑ With Retainage a) For the first 50%of completed work, and upon receipt of monthly invoices from the ENGINEER and the approval thereof by the LA, monthly payments for the work performed shall be due and payable to the ENGINEER, such payments to be equal to 90%of the value of the partially completed work minus all previous partial payments made to the ENGINEER. b) After 50%of the work is completed, and upon receipt of monthly invoices from the ENGINEER and the approval thereof by the LA, monthly payments covering work performed shall be due and payable to the ENGINEER, such payments to be equal to 95% of the value of the partially completed work minus all previous partial payments made to the ENGINEER. c) Final Payment—Upon approval of the work by the LA but not later than 60 days after the work is completed and reports have been made and accepted by the LA and the STATE, a sum of money equal to the basic fee as determined in this AGREEMENT less the total of the amounts of partial payments previously paid to the ENGINEER shall be due and payable to the ENGINEER ® Without Retainage a) For progressive payments—Upon receipt of monthly invoices from the ENGINEER and the approval thereof by the LA, monthly payments for the work performed shall be due and payable to the ENGINEER, such payments to be equal to the value of the partially completed work minus all previous partial payments made to the ENGINEER. b) Final Payment—Upon approval of the work by the LA but not later than 60 days after the work is completed and reports have been made and accepted by the LA and STATE, a sum o money equal to the basic fee as determined in this AGREEMENT less the total of the amounts of partial payments previously paid to the ENGINEER shall be due and payable to the ENGINEER. 4. The recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the award and performance of any DOT- assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 CFR part 26. The recipient shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. The recipient's DBE program, as required by 49 CFR part 26 and as approved by DOT, is incorporated by reference in this agreement Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the recipient of its failure to carry out its approved program,the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986(31 U.S.0 3801 et seq.). Ill. IT IS MUTALLY AGREED, 1. That no work shall be commenced by the ENGINEER prior to issuance by the LA of a written Notice to Proceed. 2. That tracings, plans, specifications, estimates, maps and other documents prepared by the ENGINEER in accordance with this AGREEMENT shall be delivered to and become the property of the LA and that basic survey notes, sketches, charts and other data prepared or obtained in accordance with this AGREEMENT shall be made available, upon request,to the LA or to the STATE, without restriction or limitation as to their use. Page 3 of 5 BLR 05610(Rev.9/06) Printed on 4/12/2012 9:2928 AM 3. That all reports, plans, estimates and special provisions furnished by the ENGINEER shall be in accordance with the current Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Bureau of Local Roads and Streets Administrative Policies, Federal-Aid Procedures for Local Highway Improvements or any other applicable requirements of the STATE, it being understood that all such furnished documents shall be approved by the LA and the STATE before final acceptance. During the performance of the engineering services herein provided for,the ENGINEER shall be responsible for any loss or damage to the documents herein enumerated while they are in the ENGINEER's possession and any such loss or damage shall be restored at the ENGINEER's expense. 4. That none of the services to be furnished by the ENGINEER shall be sublet, assigned or transferred to any other party or parties without written consent of the LA. The consent to sublet, assign or otherwise transfer any portion of the services to be furnished by the ENGINEER shall not be construed to relieve the ENGINEER of any responsibility for the fulfillment of this agreement. 5. To maintain,for a minimum of 3 years after the completion of the contract,adequate books, records and supporting documents to verify the amounts, recipients and uses of all disbursements of funds passing in conjunction with the contract;the contract and all books, records and supporting documents related to the contract shall be available for review and audit by the Auditor General and the STATE;and to provide full access to all relevant materials. Failure to maintain the books, records and supporting documents required by this section shall establish a presumption in favor of the STATE for the recovery of any funds paid by the STATE under the contract for which adequate books, records and supporting documentation are not available to support their purported disbursement. 6. The payment by the LA in accordance with numbered paragraph 3 of Section II will be considered payment in full for all services rendered in accordance with this AGREEMENT whether or not they be actually enumerated in this AGREEMENT. 7. That the ENGINEER shall be responsible for any and all damages to property or persons arising out of an error, omission and/or negligent act in the prosecution of the ENGINEER's work and shall indemnify and save harmless the LA,the STATE, and their officers, agents and employees from all suits,claims, actions or damages of any nature whatsoever resulting there from. These indemnities shall not be limited by the listing of any insurance policy. 8. This AGREEMENT may be terminated by the LA upon giving notice in writing to the ENGINEER at the ENGINEER's last known post office address. Upon such termination, the ENGINEER shall cause to be delivered to the LA all drawings, plats, surveys, reports, permits, agreements, soils and foundation analysis, provisions, specifications, partial and completed estimates and data, if any from soil survey and subsurface investigation with the understanding that all such material becomes the property of the LA. The LA will be responsible for reimbursement of all eligible expenses to date of the written notice of termination. 9. This certification is required by the Drug Free Workplace Act(301LCS 580). The Drug Free Workplace Act requires that no grantee or contractor shall receive a grant or be considered for the purpose of being awarded a contract for the procurement of any property or service from the State unless that grantee or contractor will provide a drug free workplace. False certification or violation of the certification may result in sanctions including, but not limited to, suspension of contract or grant payments,termination of a contract or grant and debarment of the contracting or grant opportunities with the State for at least one(1)year but no more than five(5)years For the purpose of this certification, "grantee"or"contractor"means a corporation, partnership or other entity with twenty-five (25)or more employees at the time of issuing the grant, or a department, division or other unit thereof, directly responsible for the specific performance under a contract or grant of$5,000 or more from the State, as defined in the Act. The contractor/grantee certifies and agrees that it will provide a drug free workplace by: a. Publishing a statement: (1) Notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance, including cannabis, is prohibited in the grantee's or contractor's workplace. (2) Specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition. (3) Notifying the employee that, as a condition of employment on such contract or grant,the employee will: (a) abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five(5) days after such conviction. b. Establishing a drug free awareness program to inform employees about: (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The grantee's or contractor's policy of maintaining a drug free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon an employee for drug violations. c. Providing a copy of the statement required by subparagraph (a)to each employee engaged in the performance of the contract or grant and to post the statement in a prominent place in the workplace. d. Notifying the contracting or granting agency within ten (10)days after receiving notice under part(B)of paragraph (3)of subsection (a) above from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. e. Imposing a sanction on, or requiring the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program by, f. Assisting employees in selecting a course of action in the event drug counseling,treatment and rehabilitation is required and indicating that a trained referral team is in place. g. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug free workplace through implementation of the Drug Free Workplace Act. Page 4 of 5 BLR 05610(Rev 9/06) Printed on 4/12/2012 9:29:28 AM 10. The ENGINEER or subconsultant shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the performance of this AGREEMENT. The ENGINEER shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR part 26 in the administration of DOT assisted contracts. Failure by the ENGINEER to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this AGREEMENT,which may result in the termination of this AGREEMENT or such other remedy as the LA deems appropriate. Agreement Summary Prime Consultant: TIN Number A reement Amount Engineering Enterprises, Inc. — 36-3150869 $25,000 Sub-Consultants: TIN Number Agreement Amount Sub-Consultant Total: 1 $0.00 Prime Consultant Total: $25,000 Total for all Work: $25,000 Executed by the LA: United City of Yorkville (Muni o pality/Townshlp/County) ATTEST By: By: Beth Warren-City Clerk Title: Mayor Gary Golinski (SEAL) Executed by the ENGINEER: ATTEST: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. By: By: Title: Executive Administrative Assistant Title: Vice President Page 5 of 5 BLR 05610(Rev 9/06) Printed on 4/12/2012 9:29:28 AM Fox River, �- -T T - . ► -�~— --- — _ - ---- '� ► tMufi"fie, I it I -�- is I ' f r- - 6n--St_ I rL O U 'P I — _ I —T�J I I _ �•n" i I I I I e,r C T '1 T TT I I 4W I- •�' i +r 1 - ; � ,�- �, -- -. - ► -fit; � , � I { -a{ i 1 -Si I Rod I j II ll ; 0 X20000 _ / 'Feet A ' ' Legend Existing Sidewalks { I { I I i Safe Routes to School AO Engineering Enterprises,Inc. United City of Yorkville SAFE ROUTES APPROVED LOCATION MAP CONSULTING ENGINEERS 800 Game Farm Road Sz Wheeler Road Yorkville,IL 60560 TO SCHOOL Sugar Grove,Illirom 60554 (630)553-4350 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE n] (630)466-6700/—eeiweb— http://v�rww.yorkville.il.us KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS NORTH 16—W N0. DATE REVISIONS .svno fora. 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� a► Legal ❑ CA#4 W36 EST. Finance ■ Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator El r� �! �© Consultant El ADM 2012-16 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Treasurer's Reports for February and March 2012 Meeting and Date: City Council—April 24, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Admin 4/19/12 Action Taken: Move forward to City Council consent agenda. Item Number: ADM 2012-16 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE TREASURER'S REPORT-for the period ended February 29,2012 Cash Basis %of %of Projected BGh Fund February Revenues YTD February Expenses YTD Ending Fund Balance Revenues YTD Revenues Budget Budget Expenses YTD Expenses Budget Budget Balance General Fund 01-General (271,900) 567,666 10,306,913 11,823,874 87% 796,321 8,813,063 11,059,992 80% 1,221,950 Special Revenue Funds 15-Motor Fuel Tax 640,399 42,884 471,841 1,011,000 47% 34,804 209,322 661,000 32% 902,918 79-Parks and Recreation 231,558 95,888 1,052,618 1,175,710 90% 76,373 916,830 1,189,210 77% 367,346 72-Land Cash (388,625) - 419,486 420,500 100% 1,674 263,740 301,084 88% (232,879) 85-Fox hidustrial TIF 569,790 - 259,327 - 0% - 829,116 - 0% - 87-Countryside TIF 2,178,550 218 6,450 10,250 63% - 306,829 307,543 100% 1,878,171 88-Downtown TIF 209,760 7 67,926 88,550 77% 1,967 7,380 536,840 1% 270,306 11-Fox Hill SSA 17,942 0 3,792 3,786 100% - 4,295 3,804 113% 17,439 12-Sunflower SSA 11,922 0 7,537 7,530 100% 6,921 9,078 76% 12,538 Debt Service Fund 42-Debt Service 8,653 8,647 489,782 427,919 114% 428,668 428,669 100% 69,768 Capital Funds 16-Municipal Building (587,024) - 5,700 5,250 109% - - - - (581,324) 22-Park and Recreation Capital 51,443 85 13,606 2,830 481% 292 2,917 123,500 2% 62,132 20-Police Capital 194,947 195 29,262 21,500 136% - 2,445 54,000 5% 221,764 21-Public Works Capital 108,743 293 33,827 35,900 94% 6,858 82,013 92,595 89% 60,557 23-City-Wide Capital 652 11,971 148,402 416,600 36% 3,780 129,874 360,000 36% 19,180 Enterprise Funds* 51-Water 695,723 378,266 2,389,255 2,694,979 89% 195,172 2,003,091 2,571,858 78% 1,081,887 52-Sewer 2,377,831 124,390 2,982,827 3,105,490 96% 35,595 1,637,120 2,919,989 56% 3,723,537 80-Recreation Center (195,087) 57,000 530,978 611,000 87% 86,854 571,041 691,738 83% (235,151) Library Funds 82-Library Operations 317,336 4,273 1,085,333 1,069,450 101% 59,728 886,603 1,060,275 84% 516,066 83-Library Debt Service - - 718,978 720,800 100% - 720,800 720,800 100% (1,822) 84-Library Capital - 325 340,189 341,000 100% 500 340,109 336,500 101% 80 Total Funds 6,172,614 1,292,109 21,364,030 23,993,918 89% 1,299,915 18,162,180 23,428,475 78% 9,374,464 As Treasurer of the United City of Yorkville,I hereby attest,to the best of my knowledge,that the information contained in this Treasurer's Report is accurate as of the date detailed herein. Further information is available in the Finance Department. William Powell,Treasurer Prepared by the Finance Department *Fund Balance Equivalent UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE TREASURER'S REPORT-for the period ended MARCH 31,2012 Cash Basis %of %of Projected BGN Fund Revenues YTD Expenses YTD Ending Fund Balance March Revenues YTD Revenues Budget Budget March Expenses YTD Expenses Budget Budget Balance General Fund 01-General (271,900) 808,962 11,116,000 11,823,874 94% 988,062 9,744,115 11,059,992 88% 1,099,986 Special Revenue Funds 15-Motor Fuel Tax 640,399 54,456 526,297 1,011,000 52% 3,617 212,940 661,000 32% 953,757 79-Parks and Recreation 231,558 73,611 1,126,230 1,175,710 96% 109,981 1,026,812 1,189,210 86% 330,976 72-Land Cash (388,625) 7,179 426,665 420,500 101% 1,698 265,438 301,084 88% (227,398) 85-Fox Industrial TIF 569,790 - 259,327 - 0% - 829,116 - 0% - 87-Countryside TIF 2,178,550 235 6,685 10,250 65% 375 307,204 307,543 100% 1,878,031 88-Downtown TIF 209,760 4 67,930 88,550 77% 3,212 10,591 536,840 2% 267,099 11-Fox Hill SSA 17,942 0 3,792 3,786 100% 51 4,346 3,804 114% 17,388 12-Sunflower SSA 11,922 0 7,537 7,530 100% 51 6,972 9,078 77% 12,488 Debt Service Fund 42-Debt Service 8,653 8,946 498,729 427,919 117% 428,668 428,669 100% 78,714 Capital Funds 16-Municipal Building (587,024) 1,950 7,650 5,250 146% - - - - (579,374) 22-Park and Recreation Capital 51,443 38 13,644 2,830 482% 292 3,208 123,500 3% 61,878 20-Police Capital 194,947 7,069 36,331 21,500 169% 202 2,647 54,000 5% 228,630 21-Public Works Capital 108,743 9,143 42,969 35,900 120% - 82,013 92,595 89% 69,699 23-City-Wide Capital 652 50,102 198,504 416,600 48% 456 130,330 360,000 36% 68,826 Enterprise Funds* 51-Water 695,723 47,218 2,436,509 2,694,979 90% 141,497 2,144,589 2,571,858 83% 987,643 52-Sewer 2,377,831 12,136 2,994,963 3,105,490 96% 107,808 1,744,928 2,919,989 60% 3,627,866 80-Recreation Center (195,087) 55,128 586,104 611,000 96% 54,742 625,783 691,738 90% (234,766) Library Funds 82-Library Operations 317,336 4,518 1,089,851 1,069,450 102% 68,215 954,818 1,060,275 90% 452,369 83-Library Debt Service - - 718,978 720,800 100% - 720,800 720,800 100% (1,822) 84-Library Capital - 0 340,189 341,000 100% - 340,109 336,500 101% 80 Total Funds 6,172,614 1,140,696 22,504,885 23,993,918 94% 1,480,258 19,585,428 23,428,475 84% 9,092,070 As Treasurer of the United City of Yorkville,I hereby attest,to the best of my knowledge,that the information contained in this Treasurer's Report is accurate as of the date detailed herein. Further information is available in the Finance Department. William Powell,Treasurer Prepared by the Finance Department *Fund Balance Equivalent Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 6 Legal ❑ CA#5 Finance ■ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ ADM 2012-20 Police ALE ��' Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Revised Capital Asset Policy Meeting and Date: City Council —April 24, 2012 Synopsis: Revision to City's 2003 Fixed Asset Policy. See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: June 2003 Action Taken: Approval of current policy, Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: Administration Committee EST. 1 _ 1836 From: Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director O 6 Date: March 8, 2012 Boa, =p Subject: Proposed Capital Asset Policy Revisions KantlaElCOUnry <LE Please see attached for the City's revised Capital(Fixed)Asset Policy. This is the first time that the policy has been revised since it was initially created in June of 2003. As stated in the attached document, the purpose of the Capital Asset Policy is to provide control and accountability over the City' capital assets (property, infrastructure,machinery&equipment,vehicles, etc.), and to provide guidance for financial reporting purposes. Most of the changes in the revised policy have to do with how the with how the information is presented. Besides these format adjustments, other changes include: • A"Definitions" section has been added to the revised policy, identifying and explaining commonly used capital asset accounting terminology. • The revised policy states that new capital assets will be depreciated using the half-year convention, instead of the full-month convention(current policy-pg.3). The half-year convention treats all fixed asset additions as if they were placed into service at the middle of the year and is the predominant convention used in tax accounting. In practice,the City already uses the half- year convention, due to its efficiency and simplicity. Therefore,it is recommended that the City's procedures regarding the depreciation of capital asset additions be revised, so that the policy compliments what is actually being done in practice. • The useful lives for all capital asset categories have been condensed. In addition,the useful lives of machinery&equipment,vehicles and software have been expanded to encompass the actual useful lives of the City's assets for those categories. RESOLUTION NO. 2012- RESOLUTION APPROVING A REVISED CAPITAL ASSET POLICY WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville has considered and discussed the importance of updating the United City of Yorkville Fixed Asset Policy, and WHEREAS, the text of the United City of Yorkville Capital Asset Policy the City Council now desires to adopt is set forth on the attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein, and WHEREAS, it has been determined to be in the best interests of the United City of Yorkville to repeal the previous Fixed Asset and Capitalization Policy, approved on June 10, 2003, and adopt a revised policy titled Capital Asset Policy in the form attached hereto in Exhibit "A", NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, that the Capital Asset Policy in the form set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein is hereby adopted as the Capital Asset Policy of the City and the previous Fixed Asset and Capitalization Policy heretofor adopted by the City Council is hereby repealed in its entirety. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK Resolution No.2012- Page 1 CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING LARRY KOT JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON JR Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2012. MAYOR Resolution No.2012- Page 2 United City of Yorkville Capital Asset Policy INTRODUCTION Purpose The purpose of this capital asset policy is to provide control and accountability over capital assets,and to gather and maintain information needed for the preparation of financial statements. Overview This policy is herein established to safeguard and address the United City of Yorkville's investment in property, which comprises a significant resource. This policy is meant to ensure compliance with various accounting and financial reporting standards including Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and Governmental Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Reporting(GAAFR). Furthermore, this policy is meant to reflect the United City of Yorkville's desire to meet the reporting requirements set forth in the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 34. Specifically, the GASB Statement No. 34 states that governments should provide additional disclosures in their summary of significant accounting policies including the policy for capitalizing assets and for estimating the useful lives of those assets which is used to calculate the depreciation expense. The Statement also requires disclosure of major classes of assets, beginning and end-of-year balances, capital acquisition, sales/dispositions, and current- period depreciation expense. Definitions Accumulated Depreciation — The total reduction in value over time of an asset since its acquisition,which is recorded for financial statement purposes. Acquisition Cost/Value — Assets should be recorded and reported at their historical costs, which include the vendor's invoice, freight charges, initial installation cost, modifications, attachments, accessories or apparatus necessary to make the asset usable and render it into service. Historical costs also include ancillary charges such as site preparation costs and professional fees. Additions — Newly acquired assets or modifications to existing assets. Modifications include capital outlays that increase the capacity, the useful life or efficiency of the asset. A change in capacity increases the level of service provided by an asset. A change in efficiency maintains the same service level,but at a reduced cost. Appraised Value — The estimated value of an asset based on the expertise of a qualified independent appraiser. Building—A roofed, enclosed facility intended for the permanent or temporary shelter of persons, animals,plants or equipment. Building Improvements — Capital costs that increase the value of a building. A building improvement should be capitalized as betterment and recorded as an addition of the value of the existing building if the expenditure for the improvement is at the capitalization threshold. The depreciable life of the improvement is calculated separately from the original building cost. 1 Capital Asset—A permanent item with a useful life that extends beyond one year, which is held for purposes other than investment or resale. Capital assets include land,land improvements other than buildings, infrastructure, buildings, machinery, equipment, vehicles and services necessary to the construction of infrastructure which are of long-term value. Construction in Progress — An asset that is comprised of the substantially incomplete construction costs of,typically, a road or building. Date Placed in Service—The date at which the capital asset becomes available for use. Depreciation — A method for allocating the acquisition cost/value of capital assets over time. GAAP requires that the value of capital assets must be written off as an expense ("depreciation expense") over the useful life of the asset. Disposition—The final status of an asset when it is removed from the capital asset accounts and is no longer physically located on the Government's property, e.g.,upon sale, scrap,or donation. Half-Year Convention —A depreciation convention that treats all property placed into service (or disposed of) during the fiscal year as being placed into service (or disposed of) at the midpoint of that year. Infrastructure—Assets that are long-lived capital assets that normally are stationary in nature and can be preserved for a significantly greater number of years than most capital assets. They include highways, ramps, bridges, retaining walls, parking lots, and sidewalks that the Government has purchased/constructed/accepted to fulfill its mission. Improvements other than Buildings — A modification to an outside area, other than repairs, e.g., sidewalks,parking lots,utility lines,fences. IT Equipment - All computerized and auxiliary automated equipment used in information handling, storage and retrieval and all voice, video, data communications and other communications systems equipment and controls. Land— The surface or crust of the earth, which can be used to support structures, and may be used to grow crops, grass, shrubs and trees. Land is characterized as having an unlimited life (indefinite) and is not depreciated. Land Improvements — Betterments, site preparation and site improvements (other than building and infrastructure)that ready land for its intended use. The costs associated with improvements to land are added to the cost of the land and are not depreciated. Leasehold Improvements — Construction of new buildings or improvements made to existing structures by the Government or its lessee, who has the right to use these leasehold improvements over the term of the lease. The improvements will revert to the lessor (Government) upon expiration of the lease. Moveable equipment or office furniture that is not attached to the leased property is not considered a leasehold improvement. Leased Equipment — Leased equipment should be capitalized (Capital Lease) if the lease agreement meets any one of the following four criteria: • The lease transfers ownership of the property to the lessee (Government)by the end of the lease. • The lease contains a bargain purchase option. • The lease term is 75 percent or more of the estimated economic life of the leased property. • The present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease, excluding executory costs, equals at least 90 percent of the fair value of the leased property. 2 Machine (Machinery) — any mechanical or electrical device that transmits or modifies energy to perform or assist in the performance of human tasks. Maintenance — Activities related to the repair and upkeep of an asset, with the intent of preserving the asset's original useful life and function. Costs associated with maintenance are not capitalized. Market Value — The cost to acquire an item in its current condition through an arm's length transaction. Also referred to as"fair market value"or"fair value". Net Book Value — The difference between the acquisition cost and accumulated depreciation. At the time of acquisition book value equals acquisition cost/value. Renovation — Construction activity that changes and/or improves the function of all or part of a facility. Scrap Equipment — An item that can be discarded as worthless or broken down into parts for disposal or salvage. Surplus Equipment—An item or items that are no longer needed or required. Useful Life — The period over which a capital asset has utility to the Government in performing the function for which it was purchased. Vehicles—Automobiles and trucks. This asset category includes any additions needed to allow a vehicle to perform its function such as a plow being added to a pickup truck to enable it to move snow. Each vehicle addition will have a separate asset number. INVENTORY,VALUING,CAPITALIZING AND DEPRECIATION Capital Asset Inventory Responsibility for control of capital assets will rest with the operating department wherein the asset is located. The Finance Department shall ensure that such control is maintained by establishing an inclusive capital asset inventory schedule. Asset purchases, which fall below the capitalization threshold,will not be included in the capital asset inventory. Each department will be responsible for notifying the Finance Department regarding fixed asset additions, disposals and transfers. The Department Head, or their designee, shall provide the Finance Department with the following information: • Asset Description—A description of the asset(serial#,model#,VIN#, etc.) • Asset Classification (Land and Land Improvements, Building and Building Improvements,Vehicles,Machinery and Equipment, and Infrastructure Assets) • Department name and physical location of asset • Date asset was purchased/acquired • Cost of Asset • Method of acquisition(purchased or donated) • Estimated useful life The capital asset inventory list will be maintained by the Finance Department, and will be periodically reviewed by each applicable City Department Head, or their designee. 3 Valuing Capital Assets Capital assets should be valued at historical cost, plus those costs necessary to place the asset in its location (i.e. freight, installation charges.) In the absence of historical cost information, a realistic estimate will be used. Donated assets will be recorded at their estimated current fair market value. Capitalizing When to Capitalize Assets: Assets are capitalized at the time of acquisition. To be considered a capital asset for financial reporting purposes an item must be at or above the capitalization threshold (refer to schedule on page 5) and have a useful life of at least two years. Assets Not Capitalized: Capital assets below the capitalization threshold (refer to schedule on page 5) but warranting "control" shall be inventoried at the departmental level and an appropriate list will be maintained. Capital Assets should be capitalized if they meet the following criteria: • Tangible • Useful life of more than one year(benefit more than a single fiscal period) • Cost exceeds designated threshold(refer to schedule on page 5) Routine repairs and maintenance, e.g., intermittent pavement repairs and pothole patching, are not capitalized but instead charged as an expense in the current fiscal period. Capital Assets include the following major classes of assets: Land and Land Improvements — Capitalized value is to include the purchases price plus costs such as legal and filing fees; improvements such as parking lots, fences, and pedestrian bridges. Building and Building Improvements—Costs include purchase price plus costs such as legal fees and filing fees; improvements include structures and all other property permanently attached to, or an integral part of the structure. These costs include re- roofing, electrical/plumbing, carpet replacement and HVAC. Vehicles—Costs include purchase price plus costs such as title&registration. Machinery and Equipment — Assets included in this category are heavy equipment, traffic equipment, generators, office equipment and phone systems. Infrastructure Assets — Infrastructure Assets are long-lived capital assets that are stationary in nature and normally can be preserved for a significantly greater number of years than most capital assets. Depreciation Depreciation is computed on a straight-line method. Additions or improvements to existing fixed assets will only be capitalized if the cost either enhances the asset's functionality or extends the asset's useful life. All capital asset additions will be depreciated using the half-year convention. Projects in process will be added to the asset base as the projected expenses are incurred. However,the project will first need to meet its individual asset class threshold. 4 Capital Assets Useful Lives and Thresholds are as follows: Useful Capitalization Life Threshold Land(including Right-of-Way) N/A $ 25,000 Land Improvements N/A 25,000 Buildings 10-50 Years 35,000 Building Improvements 10-20 Years 25,000 Machinery&Equipment 5-75 Years 5,000 Vehicles 5-15 Years 5,000 Software 2-5 Years 25,000 Infrastructure—Street& Storm Sewer 10-75 Years 50,000 Infrastructure—Water& Sewer 10-75 Years 75,000 OTHER Disposal of Capital Assets When a capital asset is disposed of, sold, or retired, its cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the City's capital asset accounts and a gain or loss, if any, is recognized. An asset is removed from the capital asset accounts when it is determined that the asset is no longer operable, has been replaced, or is no longer available for use. Retirement may consist of sale, scrap or donation of the asset. The disposal of any capital asset must follow the procedures established by the City Council. In addition, all capital asset retirements, and related documentation,must be reported to the Finance Department. Lost or Stolen Property When suspected or known losses of inventoried assets occur, the Department responsible for the assets should conduct a search for the missing property. The search should include transfer to another department, storage, scrapping and surplus property. If the missing property is not found, the department must report the loss to the City Administrator. 5 CITY OF YORKV ELLE FIXED ASSET & CAPITALIZATION POLICY NNE 2003 OVERVIEW This capitalization policy is designed to provide a guideline for the financial management of the City of Yorkville's capital assets. The policy has been developed.to address requirements of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board-(GASB) Statement No. 34 to ensure compliance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Capital assets include infrastructure, land, land improvements, site improvements, buildings and improvements, vehicles, machinery, equipment and other tangible and intangible assets that have a useful life beyond a single reporting period. Capital assets should be reported at historical cost, which includes the amount paid for the asset as well as all costs associated with placing the asset in service. This may include engineering fees, architectural fees, site preparation, freight, etc. When the value paid for the asset cannot be determined, the asset's fair market value at the time of acquisition will determine the cost. INFRASTRUCTURE Infrastructure assets will include such assets as roads, sidewalks, streetlights, drainage systems, water systems and sewer systems. Included in this category will also be subsystems and networks of these systems. A network of assets is composed of all assets that provide a particular type of service for a government. A subsystem of a network is composed of all assets.that make up a similar portion or segment of a network of assets. For example, all,the roads of the City would be considered the street network, while the streetlights would be a subsystem of a street network. Capitalization of infrastructure shall include costs that are above the capitalization threshold and extend the useful life, increase the capacity and / or the efficiency of the infrastructure. General maintenance and repair projects shall not be capitalized. Capital infrastructure costs would include all labor, material, professional services, insurance and other indirect costs to construct the asset and put it into service. LAND AND IMPROVEMENTS The total asset value for land shall include the acquisition cost and all costs to prepare the land for its intended use, such as excavating, grading, drainage, landscaping, etc. The cost of the land shall include the purchase price as well as all associated costs, such as legal fees, title searches and any other closing costs. Land acquired through eminent domain proceedings should be reported at the settlement amount up to the fair value of the land. Amounts paid in excess of the fair valuie should be expensed. All right-of-way assets of the City, including the land under roadways, should be recorded as land and not be depreciated. Any easements purchased by the City should be reported as intangible assets and amortized over a period not to exceed 40 years. Land improvements are the non-depreciable costs and betterments of preparing the land for its intended use. An example of a land improvement is leveling and grading- Site improvements are the depreciable costs and betterments affixed to land that generally add to its value and functionality. Examples of site improvements include, but are not limited to, temporary structures, access roads, parking lots, fencing, lighting (e.g., lights in parking lots, lights along walkways), tunnels that connect buildings, gas, electricity or steam transmission lines, and campsites. BUIILDINGS AND IMPROVEMENTS The total asset value for buildings shall be the total cost of acquisition or construction. This will include all labor, material, professional services to construct the building as well as insurance and any other indirect costs incurred during construction. Capitalization of building improvements shall include costs that are above the capitalization threshold and extend the useful life, increase the capacity and / or the efficiency of the building. General maintenance, and repair projects shall not be capitalized. EQUIPMENT The asset value of the equipment will be determined by the acquisition cost of the equipment plus any additional costs such as freight, insurance, prep charges and any other charges associated with placing the asset in service. -Equipment assets are typically moveable, 'non-consumable property. Equipment could include vehicles, furniture and Fixtures, office equipment, computers, etc. SOFTWARE The cost of software shall include the purchase price as well as the cost associated with the installation and implementation of the software. This may include travel, training, third party development and employee payroll costs directly involved with the installation. CONTRIBUTED CAPITAL Contributed capital are capital assets that have been donated or contributed to the City by either private developers, in the case of land or infrastructure for a new subdivision, or by other companies, individuals or governments. The value of contributed capital shall be recorded at the fair market value at the time of the contribution. These assets should be reported in the appropriate assets categories (e.g., land, infrastructure, etc.). DISPOSAL OF CAPITAL ASSETS Any disposal of capital assets by any City Department must be reported in detail to the Accounting Department immediately or as soon as reasonably possible. Information needed to record a disposal includes the asset description, make, model, serial number, date of acquisition, original cost, salvage value (if any) as well as any proceeds received from the disposition. An .asset disposal form provided by the Accounting Department will be used to'request/report the disposal of any fixed asset. CAPITALIZATION THRESHOLD The following capitalization threshold , table will apply when determining the capitalization of an asset. CAPITAL ASSET CATEGORY CAPITALIZATION THRESHOLD Land (including Right-of-Way) $25,000 Land Improvements $20,000 Site Improvements $20,000 Buildings $50,000 Building Improvements $25,000 Equipment $5,000 Software $25,000 Infrastructure By Individual Network Listed Below Street Network $50,000 Water Net-work $75,000 Sanitary Sewer Network $75,000 Storm Sewer Network 1 $50,000 DEPRECIATION Depreciation is a method of allocating the cost of an asset over its estimated useful life, rather than deducting the cost as an expense in the year of acquisition. Generally, at the end of an asset's life, the sum of the amounts charged for depreciation in each accounting period (accumulated depreciation) will equal the original cost less the expected salvage value (if any). Capital assets will be depreciated over their estimated useful lives. The straight-line method of depreciation will be used using a fall month convention. For example, one month's worth of depreciation expense would be recognized on an asset acquired on April 18 based on the City's fiscal year-end of April 30. Land and land improvements should not be depreciated. To calculate depreciation the following factors must be known: • The date the asset was placed in service • The cost or acquisition value • The salvage value (usually$0) • The estimated useful life • The depreciation method (straight-line rnethod) ESTIMATED USEFUL LIVES The following table will apply for depreciation depending on the capital asset category: CAPITAL ASSET CATEGORY ESTIMATED USEFUL LIFE (IN YEARS) Land(including Right-of-Way) Not Depreciated Land Improvements Not Depreciated Site Improvements 3-50 Buildings 10-50 Building Improvements 10-20 Equipment 3-10 Software 2-7 Infrastructure 10-75 (See Detailed Information Below) INFRASTRUCTURE USEFUL LIVES Streets: 3040 years with periodic maintenance Bike Trails: 30-40 years with periodic maintenance Storm Sewers: Open Channels or ditches: 20-25 years with periodic maintenance Sewer Mains: 50-60 years Retention Ponds: 20-25 years before dredging is necessary Pump Stations: 25-30 years Water: Wells: 20-25 years Water Mains: 50-60 years Water Towers: 60-75 years with periodic painting and cleaning Water Plant: 25-30 years Sanitary Sewers: Sewer Mains: 50-60 years Pump Stations: 25-30 years Treatment Plant: 25-30 years If a significant capital or infrastructure asset is estimated to be still in use after its established useful life, the City should revise the asset's useful life to estimate the actual number of years the asset will remain in use. This new revised useful life should be treated as a change in accounting estimate and applied to all on going calculations of depreciation. With a change in accounting estimate, there is no retroactive affect caused by the change. FMD ASSETS vs. INVENTORY CONTROL Assets that are valued below the capitalization threshold but above S 1,D00 in value will warrant control and shall be inventoried at the department level. An appropriate list of these assets will be maintained by each department and copies will be provided to the Accounting Department. Information maintained should include asset description, location, make, model, serial number and/or any other information deemed necessary for control. Such inventory items could include computers, printers, copiers, power tools, chain saws, small construction equipment, mowers, fire equipment, etc. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY The Accounting Department shall be responsible for the accounting for capital asset inventories, both initially and pdriodically in subsequent years. The Accounting Department will ensure that the capital asset Iedger will be updated annually to reflect additions, retirements, and transfers to reflect the new annual capital asset balance for financial reporting purposes and the annual depreciation calculations. CIP Reviewed By: K 0 Legal Agenda Item Number 06 Finance ❑ CA#6 ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 .4 �� ; � y Human Resources El Tracking Number � wn sw © Community Development ❑ �_ Police ❑ ADM 2012-21 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Veolia Contract Extension Agreement Meeting and Date: City Council—April 24, 2012 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: Administration Committee EST. -�` Yid W3s From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: March 9, 2012 C<wrMY Sad Subject: Veolia Contract Extension ALE Summary Extension of a solid waste refuse collection contract with Veolia. Background The City's current refuse contract expires on April 30, 2012. Because we have partnered with the Village of Oswego for a joint RFP, I do not expect the RFP process to wrap up before mid-Summer. Accordingly, Veolia has agreed to extend our current contract through July, at current prices. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the contract. First Amendment to the Contract for the United City of Yorkville Garbage, Refuse, Recyclables & Yard Waste Collection between The United City of Yorkville and Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC This First Amendment("First Amendment") to the Refuse, Recyclables & Landscape Waste Collection & Disposal Services Agreement, dated May 1St, 2006 (the "Agreement"), by and between the United City of Yorkville, a municipal government of the State of Illinois (hereinafter the "City") and Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest,LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company(hereinafter the "Contractor") is made this 15th day of March, 2012 (the "Effective Date"). WHEREAS, the City and Contractor have previously entered into an agreement for municipal solid waste, recycling and landscape waste services provided to the City by the Contractor; and WHEREAS, the City and Contractor desire to extend and amend certain of the terms and conditions of that Agreement to be effective January 1St, 2012; NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. 62. Term of Contract. The Agreement is amended by adding the following paragraph to the end of Section 62.1 to allow for a short extension to the contract and shall read as follows: "Unless earlier terminated, as hereinafter provided, the term of this Agreement may be extended from April 30, 2012 through July 31, 2012 at the request of the City. After July 31, 2012 contract may be extended on a month to month basis by mutual consent of the parties. The Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until July 31, 2012 and any Page 1 of 2 subsequent extension periods unless terminated for cause or earlier as provided for herein." Except as otherwise amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. Veolia ES Solid Waste Midwest, LLC United City of Yorkville,IL By: By: Name: Name: Title: Title: Page 2 of 2 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� $ 06 Legal ❑ CA#7 Finance ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ -_� City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El� Wn sw _© Community Development ❑ ADM 2012-22 � Police F-1 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Resolution Authorizing Transfer of MFT Funds to New IMET Account Meeting and Date: City Council —April 24, 2012 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: Administration Committee EST. 1 _ 1836 From: Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director O 6 Date: April 2, 2012 9 Subject: Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund(IMET) MFT Account KantlaElCOUnry <LE Currently,the City has a separate account at Castle Bank for motor fuel tax(MFT) funds received from the State of Illinois. This account is presently yielding an annual interest rate of 10 basis points- 0.0010%. It is the recommendation of staff that this account at Castle Bank be closed and that the monies be transferred to a new account at Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund(IMET),which is currently yielding an annualized interest rate of 27 basis points—0.0027%. Please note that these funds would be held at IMET in a separate account and would not be comingled with operating funds. In addition,by moving these funds to IMET the City will be able to earn approximately three times more in interest income,without sacrificing liquidity or incurring additional risk. RESOLUTION NO. 2012- A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS TO A NEW ACCOUNT WITH THE ILLINOIS METROPOLITAN INVESTMENT FUND Whereas, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2000-19 on August 10, 2009 that created a NOW checking account for the City's motor fuel tax funds at Castle Bank; and, Whereas, the City Administrator has requested that the above account be closed and the existing motor fuel tax funds from that account be transferred to a new account with the Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That the City Administrator is hereby authorized to close and transfer the motor fuel tax funds from the existing Castle Bank account into a new account with the Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund. Section 2. That the authorized signatories for the above Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund account shall be the Mayor, City Treasurer, City Administrator and Finance Director and that two (2) signatories shall be required to approve and sign each check for withdrawal from that account. Section 3. That Resolution No. 2000-19 be and is hereby repealed. Section 4. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK 1 ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2012. MAYOR 2 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 606 Legal ❑ CA#8 Finance ■ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ ADM 2012-23 Police ALE ��' Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Fund Balance Policy Meeting and Date: City Council —April 24, 2012 Synopsis: Revision to City's Fund Balance Policy in order to comply with GASB54 by April 30, 2012. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 12/01/2004 Action Taken: Current fund balance policy effective. Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum EST -,l Isas To: Administration Committee From: Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director p� az 2p� Date: April 12, 2012 Kentlal COUnTy ALE Subject: Fund Balance Policy In February 2009, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board(GASB) issued Statement No. 54,Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions, which will change the way fund balance is reported in the annual financial reports. To give a little background, fund balance is the difference between assets and liabilities in a governmental fund (all of the City's funds except the Water, Sewer and Rec Ctr are governmental funds). Because governmental funds only report current assets (cash and investments,receivables, inventory and prepaid expenses) and current liabilities (accounts payable, wages payable, escrow deposits and deferred revenue), fund balance is an approximate measure of liquidity, and is similar to the "net working capital" of a private business. Prior to GASB 54, fund balance was either reserved or unreserved. Reserved fund balance was not available for appropriation because those funds had already been spent(in the form of prepaid expenses) or were reserved for such items as debt service or capital projects. Unreserved fund balance could either be designated or undesignated. Designated unreserved fund balance was available for appropriation,but had limits as to how the funds could be used as imposed by the City Council. Undesignated unreserved fund balance was available for use, with no external or internal restrictions. Please see Attachment A, which is an excerpt from the 2011 CAFR, showing the old fund balance presentation of the City's governmental funds. Under GASB 54, fund balance is broken down into five components, which are identified and briefly explained below: • Nonspendable Fund Balance—funds that cannot be spent because of their form—i.e. prepaid expenses. • Restricted Fund Balance—funds that are subject to externally enforceable legal restrictions—e.g., motor fuel and property taxes. • Committed Fund Balance—funds whose use is constrained by the City's highest level of decision making (i.e., City Council). These are formal restrictions (passed by ordinance) and would require the same action to remove the restriction. • Assigned Fund Balance—these are funds whose intended use is established by Council or management without a formal action. • Unassigned Fund Balance—total fund balance in the General Fund that cannot be classified in any of the four categories mentioned above. Only the General Fund can have positive unassigned fund balance. However, other governmental funds would report any negative fund balance as unassigned as well. Please note that due to differing governmental fund purposes and structures,not all funds will have all five components of fund balance. In addition, GASB 54 has no impact on how the City's enterprise funds (Water, Sewer and Rec Ctr) are shown for financial reporting purposes. In order to be in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), the City must pass a fund balance policy that is compliant with GASB 54 by April 30, 2012. Attachment B gives an example of how the General Fund's new fund balance components may look if GASB 54 had been previously implemented. Please note that this example is for illustrative purposes only, and does not reflect management's assertions of actual fiscal year ending 2012 fund balance for the General Fund. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS Governmental Funds Balance Sheet April 30,2011 Nonmajor Total General Library Governmental Governmental Fund Fund Funds Funds Assets Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 349,841 4,029,552 4,379,393 Receivables Property Taxes Receivable 2,749,964 1,395,800 324,179 4,469,943 Intergovernmental Receivables 1,576,444 347,407 1,923,851 Accounts Receivable 488,780 755 5,424 494,959 Utility Taxes Receivable 239,106 239,106 Interfund Receivables 100,000 585,713 685,713 Prepaid Items 136,917 8,487 145,404 Total Assets $ 5,291,211 1,746,396 5,300,762 12,338,369 Liabilities Accounts Payable $ 531,957 23,229 134,516 689,702 Retainage Payable 3,201 3,201 Accrued Payroll 75,382 10,031 14,515 99,928 Deferred Revenue 3,180,412 1,395,800 352,373 4,928,585 Other Liabilities 198,074 219,421 417,495 Interfund Payables 1,577,286 1,328,026 2,905,312 Total Liabilities 5,563,111 1,429,060 2,052,052 9,044,223 Fund Balances Reserved for Prepaid Items 136,917 8,487 145,404 Capital Purposes 2,736,585 2,736,585 Debt Service 578,443 578,443 Unreserved,Undesignated Reported In General Fund (408,817) (408,817) Special Revenue Funds 317,336 511,567 828,903 Capital Project Funds (586,372) (586,372) Total Fund Balances (271,900) 317,336 3,248,710 3,294,146 Total Liabilities and Fund Balances $ 5,291,211 1,746,396 5,300,762 12,338,369 See accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements. 17 GASB 54 Implementation Attachment B Based on General Fund Balance Sheet as ofApril 12, 2012 (Cash Basis) Assets Receivables 4,877,190.23 Prepaid Expense 67,472.76 Total Assets 4,944,662.99 Liabilities Payables 884.74 Payroll W/H 5,120.86 Accrued Wages Payable 71,345.19 Due to Other Funds 622,838.08 Escrow Deposits 162,512.37 Deferred Revenue 3,180,412.38 Total Liabilities 4,043,113.62 Fund Balance Nonspendable 67,472.76 Equal to prepaid expenses above Restricted 8,050.45 Levied$52,850.45 for Audit Expenses, but only paid$44,800 Committed - Assigned 332,500.00 Interfund transfer from Library Capital-to be used for Game Farm Rd Project in future fiscal periods Unassigned 493,526.16 Fund balance in excess of the above categories Total Fund Balance 901,549.37 RESOLUTION NO. 2012- RESOLUTION APPROVING A REVISED FUND BALANCE POLICY WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville has considered and discussed the importance of updating the United City of Yorkville Fund Balance Policy, and WHEREAS, the text of the United City of Yorkville Fund Balance Policy the City Council now desires to adopt is set forth on the attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein, and WHEREAS, it has been determined to be in the best interests of the United City of Yorkville to repeal the previous Fund Balance Reserve Contingency Fund Policy, approved on July 27, 2004, and adopt a revised policy titled Fund Balance Policy in the form attached hereto in Exhibit"A". NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, that the Fund Balance Policy in the form set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein is hereby adopted as the Fund Balance Policy of the City and the previous Fund Balance Reserve Contingency Fund Policy heretofor adopted by the City Council is hereby repealed in its entirety. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK Resolution No.2012- Page 1 CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING LARRY KOT JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON JR Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2012. MAYOR Resolution No.2012- Page 2 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FUND BALANCE POLICY Purpose A Fund Balance Policy establishes a minimum level at which the projected end-of-year fund balance should observe, as a result of the constraints imposed upon the resources reported by the governmental funds. This policy is established to provide financial stability, cash flow for operations, and the assurance that the United City of Yorkville will be able to respond to emergencies with fiscal resiliency. More detailed fund balance financial reporting and the increased disclosures will aid the user of the financial statements in understanding the availability of resources. It is the City's philosophy to support long-term financial strategies, where fiscal sustainability is its first priority, while also building funds for future growth. It is essential to maintain adequate levels of funds balance to mitigate current and future risks and to ensure tax rates. Fund balance levels are also crucial consideration in long-term financial planning. Credit rating agencies carefully monitor levels of fund balance and unassigned fund balance in the General Fund to evaluate the City's continued creditworthiness. Definitions Governmental Funds The fund balance will be composed of three primary categories: 1) Nonspendable Fund Balance — portion of a Governmental Fund's fund balance that are not available to be spent, either in the short-term or long-term, or through legal restrictions (e.g., inventories, prepaid items, land held for resale and endowments). 2) Restricted Fund Balance—portion of a Governmental Fund's fund balance that are subject to external enforceable legal restrictions (e.g., grantor, contributor and property tax levies). 3) Unrestricted Fund Balance—is made up of three components: A) Committed Fund Balance — the portion of a Governmental Fund's fund balance with self-imposed constraints or limitations that have been placed at the highest level of decision making through formal City Council action. The same action is required to remove the commitment of fund balance. B) Assigned Fund Balance — the portion of a Governmental Fund's fund balance to denote an intended use of resources but with no formal City Council action. C) Unassigned Fund Balance — available expendable financial resources in a governmental fund that is not the object of tentative management plan. Some funds are funded by a variety of resources, including both restricted and unrestricted (committed, assigned and unassigned). Flow of Funds The United City of Yorkville assumes that the order of spending fund balance is as follows: restricted, committed, assigned,unassigned. 1 Authority Governmental Funds Committed Fund Balance — A self-imposed constraint on spending the fund balance must be approved by ordinance or resolution of the City Council. Any modifications or removal of the self-imposed constraint must use the same action used to commit the fund balance. Formal action to commit fund balance must occur before the end of the fiscal year. The dollar amount of the commitment can be determined after year end. Assigned Fund Balance — An informal, self-imposed constraint on spending the fund balance based on the City's intent to use fund balance for a specific purpose. The Budget Officer will determine if a portion of fund balance should be assigned. Minimum Unrestricted Fund Balance Levels Governmental Funds General Fund Purpose—Is a major fund and the general operating fund of the United City of Yorkville. It is used to account for all activities that are not accounted for in another fund. Contingency Fund—A Contingency Fund shall maintain a reserve balance of 3 to 5% of the ensuing year's appropriations budget (excluding interfund transfers) and will be included as a separate line item in the General Fund expenditure budget. The contingency fund shall be used to satisfy unforeseen expenditures, and may included amounts outside of the 3 to 5% range mentioned above, at the discretion of management and/or the City Council. For amounts less than $5,000, the Budget Officer may authorize use of these funds upon approval by the Mayor. Use of contingency funds in excess of $5,000, requires approval by the City Council. Fund Balance — Unrestricted fund balance targets should represent no less than 15% of the annual General Fund appropriations budget. Balances in excess of 50% of the annual General Fund appropriations budget are to be transferred to other funds or to capital projects at the discretion of the City Council. Special Revenue Fund Purpose - Used to account for and report the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects. Financing— Special revenue funds are provided by a specific annual property tax levy or other restricted and/or committed revenue source. Financing may also be received from charges for services, etc. Fund Balance — Derived from property taxes (or another restricted revenue source); therefore, legally restricted. The portion of fund balance derived from property taxes will be legally restricted. The remaining fund balance amount (restricted and/or committed) will vary and be adjusted annually with the adoption of the annual budgets for these funds. 2 Debt Service Fund Purpose—Established to account for financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditure for principal and interest. Financing — The municipality levies an amount or transfers in an amount close to the principal and interest that is anticipated to be paid. Fund Balance — Derived from property taxes; therefore, legally restricted. Any fund balance accumulation should be at maximum the amount of the subsequent fiscal year's principal and interest payments. Capital Projects Fund Purpose - Established to account for and report financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditure for capital outlays including the acquisition or construction of capital facilities and other capital assets, excluding those types of capital related outflows financed by proprietary funds. Financing— Debt financing, grants, licenses and permits and interfund transfers are used to finance projects. Fund Balance — Considered segregated for maintenance, construction and/or development; therefore, considered committed, restricted, or assigned depending on the intended source and use of the funds. Proprietary Funds Proprietary funds include enterprise and internal service funds. Enterprise Fund Purpose —For financial reporting purposes, and Enterprise Fund is established to account for and report financial resources at are invested in capital assets, net of related debt, restricted, or unrestricted for future spending related to the fund. The focus of enterprise fund measurement is based upon determination of operating income, changes in net assets, financial position, and cash flows. The generally accepted accounting principles applicable are those similar to businesses in the private sector. Enterprise funds are required to account for operations for which a fee is charged to external users for goods or services and the activity (a) is financed with debt that is solely secured by a pledge of the net revenues, (b) has third party requirements that the cost of providing services, including capital costs, be recovered with fees and charges or (c) establishes fees and charges based on a pricing policy designed to recover similar costs. Financing — User fees, debt financing, and/or grants are used to finance operations, capital outlay and improvements, and debt service retirements. Fund Balance Equivalent — For financial reporting purposes, the equity portion of a proprietary (enterprise or internal service) fund's balance sheet is comprised of "Net Assets", which is equal to total fund assets less total fund liabilities. Net Assets are comprised of three primary components: 1.) Invested in Capital Assets, Net of Related Debt (i.e., amounts capitalized as capital assets, less the outstanding debt related to the 3 acquisition of said assets); 2.) Restricted Net Assets relate to bond covenant reserves as outlined in the bond ordinance; and 3.) Unrestricted Net Assets. For budgetary purposes management has chosen to deviate from the traditional full accrual presentation of enterprise funds, and instead uses a modified accrual approach. This modified accrual approach converts net assets into a "fund balance equivalent", by excluding long-term assets and liabilities. It is management's assertion that the modified accrual approach is preferable for budgetary purposes, because it more accurately reflects the funds ability to satisfy short-term obligations (operations, capital outlay and debt service) in current and subsequent fiscal years. Fund Balance Equivalency targets for enterprise funds should be maintained at no less than 25% of the annual appropriations budget. Other Considerations In establishing the above policies for unrestricted fund balance levels, the United City of Yorkville considered the following factors: • The predictability of the City's revenues and the volatility of its expenditures (i.e., higher levels of unrestricted fund balance may be needed if significant revenue sources are subject to unpredictable fluctuations or if operating expenditures are highly volatile). • The City's perceived exposure to significant one-time outlays (e.g., disasters, immediate capital needs, state budget cuts). • The potential drain upon General Fund resources from other funds as well as the availability of resources in other funds (i.e., deficits in other funds may require a higher level of unrestricted fund balance be maintained in the General Fund, just as, the availability of resources in other funds may reduce the amount of unrestricted fund balance needed in the General Fund). • Liquidity (i.e., a disparity between when financial resources actually become available to make payments and the average maturity of related liabilities may require that a higher level of resources be maintained). • Commitments and assignments (i.e., governments may wish to maintain higher levels of unrestricted fund balance to compensate for any portion of unrestricted fund balance already committed or assigned by the government for a specific purpose). If any of the above factors change, the City should readdress current unrestricted fund balance levels to ensure amounts are appropriate. 4 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FUND BALANCE RESERVE CONTINGENCY FUND POLICY Purpose To maintain the City's credit rating,meet seasonal cash flow shortfalls,provide for unexpected contingencies,and continue to provide city services by establishing an unrestricted reserve balance in the City's General Corporate Fund,hereafter called the General Fund,as well as in the Water Operating and Sewer Maintenance Funds. Objectives Establishment of a short-term Contingency Fund to be used for emergency and contingency needs for the City's General,Water Operating, and Sewer Maintenance Funds. The Contingency Fund is intended to protect and maintain the Fund Balance reserve. Establishment of a Fund Balance reserve to be used for unanticipated reductions in state,development or other anticipated revenues as well as emergency and contingency expenditure needs. Policy Contingency Fund:The Contingency Fund shall maintain a reserve cash balance between 3 to 5%of the ensuing year's budgeted operating expenditure amount. This fund shall be used to meet month-to-month operating expenses in anticipation of forthcoming revenues or to fund unforeseen expenditures.For amounts$5000.00 or less,the City Staff may authorize the use of these funds upon notification to the Treasurer and approval by the Mayor.Use of contingency funds exceeding$5000.00 requires approval by the City Council. The Contingency Fund shall be funded each year at the time of budget approval. This will be accomplished by establishing and maintaining a separate line item in the fiscal budget. Fund Balance:The Fund Balance Reserve shall maintain a balance of 15%to 25 %of the ensuing fiscal year's budgeted operating expenditure amount. This reserve shall be used to meet annual cash requirements as a result of an unanticipated reduction in state,development,or other anticipated revenues as well as emergency and contingency expenditure needs after the ensuing fiscal year's budget has been approved. Consideration of a reduction in projected expenditures shall be evaluated prior to use of Fund Balance Reserve funds.Use of Fund Balance Reserves may reflect a change in budgeting policy in future years and therefore requires the approval of the City Council. The City shall attempt to accumulate the Fund Balance Reserve over a 5-year period by reserving up to 5%per year through the budget process.If the Fund Balance Reserve levels cannot be achieved within a five-year period, City Council action will be required to reduce the Fund Balance Reserve amount, 1 reduce expenditures,increase revenues, or extend the allotted time. Any excess Fund Balance Reserves shall be included in the next fiscal year budget.Excess Fund Balance Reserves under this policy are actual undesignated fund balance dollars available on the year-end financial statements. Delegation of Authority Oversight of the Fund Balance Reserve/Contingency Fund Policy is delegated to the City Treasurer.Day to day management and administrative responsibility for the Policy is delegated to the City Finance Director. Reporting Fund Balance Reserves and Contingency Funds will be monitored on the monthly Treasurer's report and adjusted during the Annual and Semi-annual budget process. Implementation This policy will be effective as of Dec 1,2004. 2 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 6 Legal ❑ CA#9 Finance ■ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ ADM 2012-24 Police ALE ��' Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Copier RFP—Vendor Selection Meeting and Date: City Council —April 24, 2012 Synopsis: Recommendation to award 3-year contract to McGrath Office Equipment. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: Administration Committee EST. -,l 1836 From: Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director .4 y Date: April 12, 2012 � az 2p� Subject: Copier RFP Kentlal COUnTy C(,E �yv Upon review of the Request for Proposal (RFP) submissions from seven vendors, it is the recommendation of staff that the City accept the proposal from McGrath Office Equipment to meet the City's copier equipment needs. All of the requirements in the RFP were meet or exceeded in their submission. In addition to being the low cost provider, McGrath offers a high level of service and quality equipment. Due to the rapid rate at which technology changes, staff recommends that the City opt for the 36-month (3 year) leasing term. The McGrath Office Equipment proposal has been attached for your review. McGrath Fax1 815/942-8103 416 Liberty St. Office Equipment, Inc. Morris,IL 60450 March 21, 2012 United City Of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Attn: Mr. Rob Fredrickson-Finance Director Dear Rob: Thank you for considering McGrath Office Equipment and Savin as a possible vendor for your future office equipmement needs. McGrath Office Equipment is in our 70 year of servicing the office needs of our community. We have hundreds of existing customers, several of which have needs similar to yours. Feel free to contact any of our exisitng customers including: Rick Kaczanko,Village of Plainfield IT Director, 815-230-2053 Dick Kopczick, City of Morris Mayor, 815-942-5438 Saratoga Grade School,Kathy Perry Superintendant , 815-942-2128 The following pages are completed copies of Appendix A from your RFP. The top of the page shows the location of each unit. The middle of the page shows the make/model of my recommendation. The bottom chart is completed as per your directions. All of this proposed equipment meets or exceeds your requirements. If you need brochures,feel free to visit www.savin.com or simply call me and I can send you what you need. There will be no charge for installation of this equipment. The maintenance contract will be billed monthly and added to the lease rate. Calls for service and supplies can be done over the internet. McGrath's will work closely with the City to make an easy return of existing equipment to the current leasing company. The City will have the option at any time of purchasing at FMV the leased equipment. Billing will be done directly through McGrath Office Equipment on a monthly basis. We accept Cash, Check,Credit Cards,or Direct Deposit within 30 days of invoice. Extended grace periods are available as necessary. Installation/training of the above equipment will be completed within 48 hours of original start date. ce C s org McGrath Office Equipment, Inc. Copy Print Fax Scan Furniture Supplies McGrath Fax: 815/942-8103 416 Liberty St. Office Equipment, Inc. Morris, IL 60450 March 21, 2012 In March of 1936, J.L. McGrath left his position as a typewriter service technician with the Underwood Typewriter Company to begin his own business. In the early days, his inventory consisted of one typewriter at a time until he sold enough to stock multiple typewriters. With the help of his wife Irene, his business gradually grew to the point of handling most of the typewriter business in Will and Grundy Counties. In 1960, J.L. and Irene's daughter Priscilla married Robert Borgstrom. When Robert finished his service in the U.S. Navy in 1964, he and Priscilla returned to Joliet to take over the family business. In 1965 Robert opened a branch of McGrath Office Equipment in downtown Morris. Jim Provancal was hired to manage the Morris store, while Robert continued to handle the Will County business from the Joliet store. Today McGrath Office Equipment is managed by the four sons of Robert and Priscilla. Bob Jr. and Mark manage the Joliet office at 710 West Jefferson St. Chris and Jeff manage the location on Liberty Street in downtown Morris. Stop in at 416 Liberty St. and you'll see how McGrath's has grown from a true "Mom and Pop" store to an affordable supplier of everything for the office. As the typewriter business has changed over the past 75 years, so has McGrath Office Equipment. Today McGrath Office Equipment supplies area businesses with copy equipment—full color and black & white, as well as printing, faxing, and scanning equipment all supported by factory and network trained service personnel. Additionally, McGrath's has become the area's leader in office furniture. Call Chris today at 815-942-4173 or visit www.mcgrathoffice.com they'll present you with a free analysis of your office needs. From special pricing on office machines and office supplies to a complete furniture layout of your office, McGrath Office Equipment continues to provide everything for the office since 1936. Copy Print Fax Scan Furniture Supplies ADMIN endix A United City of Yorkville App 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 t� N Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 kE Copier Equipment Request for Proposal - Cost Summary Worksheet One fww to be completed per nmke/model proposed b) mdor,and milinted with AFP. Admen X X X X 2500 ISk - . Police 1 X X . X X 2500 lok Poliee2 - X - 1000 A Caam Or X X X 2500 3k Puldie Works X 1000 Ik, gam•Center X X X 1000 14k List make/model of proposed eouioment: Savin C5502 MaintenanceContrWPrice - alm'enL ( lease list as rice/month 7cizt i�tr(bcas� 36-month lease 48-month lease 60.month lease 314 260 220 75 75 75 Cost for features as ouWned on Page S of RFP,or supplies(excluding paper)not covered under maintenance contract: 36-mouth lease 48-month lease 4z-Month h lease Included in Feature or Supplies ksa.rl rams. priceabow? m oea4 t+sawr.�J W--ftw '-j peeos0.renl,.r,we) YorN Color Machine 230 190 160 Y Hole Punch 9 7 6 Y Stapler Finisher 45 35 30 Y Fax 15 14 12 Y Large Capacity Tray 15 14 12 Y . 045 per Color Copies Page 6 of 6 McGrath Office Equipment,Inc. 710 West Jefferson St. J011eto 14 60435 POLICE 1 United City of Yorkville A ppen=xA P 800 Game Farm Road EME -' ` Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 < . =< y Telephone: 630-553-4350 `' �2° Fax: 630-553-7575 <4E Copier Equipment Request for Proposal - Cost Summary Worksheet One jot2n to be completed per atake/ntodel proposed b},vendor,and rentnted lvlth RFP. Admix X X X R 2300 13k - Police 1 X X . X X 2500 lok Polke2 X 1000 3k Cana Dylp 2300 3k Public works X 1000 lk Pt Center x X X low 14k List makelmodel of proposed cauipmert• Savin C5502 - �- Maintenance Contract Price ritxlmonth ati t:ase 36-month lease I 49-month lease 60-month lease 314 260 220 50 50 50 Cost for features as outlined on Page 5 of RFP,or supplles O'clading paper)not mrered under maintenance contract: 36-month lease 48-month lease 60-month lease IOCiO to Feature or Supplies t.sreta«„e7a. maam0«m40.- priceobow? M-.km :M) or N) Color Machine 230 190 160 Hole Punch 9 7 6 Y Stapler Finisher 45 35 30 Y Fax 15 14 12 Y Large Capacity Tray 15 14 12 Y . 045 per Color Copies Page 6 of 6 McGrath Office Equipment, Inc. 710 West Jefferson St. Joliet, IL 60435 POLICE 2 F United City of Yorkville Appendix A w 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 <r y Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 �n4E Copier Equipment Request for Proposal - Cost summary Worksheet one joim to be canpleted per 5rakekmodel proposed b),i e idor,and returned ivlth RFP. Rom pdn- X X X X 2500 Isk . Police 1 X X . X X 2500 Ifac Po1ke2 X Io00 3k C.�, X X X 25M 3k .Pu6lie wod:s X 1000 Ik lice.Center X --T-X 1500 14k List makelmodel of pronosed equipment: Savin MP5002SP Maintenance Contract Price on'tlt'g �'" gpUl` easeN. 36-month lease I 48-mamth lease I 60-month lease 168 141 . 50 1 122 20 20 20 Cost for features as outlined on Page 5 of RFP,on supplles(escludingpoper)not mrtred under maintenance contract. 36-mouth lease 48-month]ee 60 month(ease hcludedm as Feature or Supplies -ftp. pricenbove? wm«a te;«vs.K.l rn eams,ceron•.�a ree�aM> .M) or N) Black & White Machine 140 119 103 Y Stapler Finisher 25 20 17 Y Console 3 2 . 50 2 Y Page 6of6 McGrath Office Equipment, Inc. 710 West Jefferson St. Joliet, IL 60435 COMM DVLP o2�, C1pr� United City of Yorkville Appendix A 800 Game Farm Road Emn Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Copier Equipment Request for Proposal - Cost summary Worksheet One form to be coa)pleted per ntakelniodel proposed b),)Odor,and lehnned ivlth BFF. 7 Adrnm X X X X 2500 15k rolire 1 X X . X X asap log Polke2 - X 1000 3k C.,Dr X X X 2500 3k - Public works X 1000 Ik Itea tenor X X X 1000 14k List make/model of proposed eauipment• Savin C5502 _- - - - - '• ^� "Y--'�" Maintenance Contract Price (please list as ricdmonth - tli.�ease am`t4eas 36-month lease I 48-month lean I 60-month lease 299 T 234 . 50 198 20 20 20 Cost for features as outlined on Page 5 of RFP,or supplies(escludtng paper)not covered under maintenance contract. 36-month Iease 48-month lease 6amonth lease Included in Feature or Supplies priceabove7 m naw,e�.ovr.n..l � ca�+m•.«•.) ro•. -*Mmrr..r-) or N) Color Machine 230 190 160 y Hole Punch 9 35 30 y Stapler Finisher 45 7 6 y Large Capacity Tray 15 2 . 50 2 y . 045 Per Color Copies Page 6 of 6 McGrath Office Equipment, Inc. 710 West Jefferson St. Joliet, IL 60435 PUBLIC WORKS endix A ��D C1Ty� United City of Yorkville App : P 800 Game Farm Road 'Ism Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 =r_ h Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Copier Equipment Request for Proposal - Cost Summary Worksheet One john to be completed per nwke/model proposed b)•mdor,and mhawed Ivlth RFP. 77 pdoua X X X X 2300 13k 171ZI X X . X X 2300 10k Polke2 X I000 3k Conan DAD X X X 2300 3k PuNio Works X 1000 Ik lice.ceater X X X 1000 14k List make/model of proposed eouipmeD Savin MP5002SP Maintenance Contract Price - - - (please list as price/month) `7sa5:e; - .on' ease, 36-month lease 4 rn mw lean 6o-month lease 168 141. 50 122 20 20 20 Cost for features as outlined on Page 5 of RFP,or supplies(eseluding paper)not covered under maiutenance contract: 36-month lease 48-month lease 60-month lease eluded in Feature or Supplies price above? or N) Black & White Machine 140 119 103 Y Stapler Finisher 25 20 17 Y Console 3 2 . 50 2 Y Page 6 of 6 McGrath Office Equipment, Inc. 710 West Jefferson St. Joliet, IL 60435 REC. CENTER ��v cfpr Appendix A United City of Yorkville �< P 800 Game Farm Road E` j- W% Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Kr y Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 �l(E NH Copier Equipment Request for Proposal - Cost Summary Worksheet One form to be coorpleted per nmkebnodel proposed b),vendor,and r,unwed udth RFR Admen X X X X 2300 15k - Polkel X X . X X 2300 IOk Palice2 X 1000 3k Conan Dylp X X X 2300 3k Pub ie Wads X 1000 Ik l-- ttemecater X X X 1000 14k List make/model of proposed equipment: Savin C5502 Maintenance Contract Price ( lease list as rice/month =�icy ` modtlt sz 36-month lease I 4 8-month lease 60-month lease 287 234 . 50 198 70 70 7n Cost for features as outlined on Page 5 of RFP,or supplies(excluding paper)not covered under matutenance contract: 36-month lean 49-month lease 60-month lease Included in Feature or Supplies w�Pe.row tes ksa rd«a6yo. mame0aou201- price above? M.-km .M) or N) Color Machine 230 190 160 Y Stapler Finisher 45 35 30 Hole Punch 9 7 6 Y Console 3 2 . 50 2 Y . 045 Per Color Copies Page 6 of 6 McGrath Office Equipment, Inc. 710 West Jefferson St. Joliet, IL 60435 36 - Month Lease Monthly Cost Annualized Cost McGrath Office Equipment $ 2,162.00 $ 25,944.00 Digital Business Technologies $ 2,250.20 $ 27,002.40 Proven Business Systems $ 2,302.65 $ 27,631.74 Gordon Flesch Company $ 2,452.68 $ 29,432.10 Konica Minolta $ 2,549.75 $ 30,597.00 KKC Imaging Systems Toshiba $ 2,672.16 $ 32,065.86 COTG Proposal $ 2,688.55 $ 32,262.65 KKC Imaging Systems Canon $ 3,031.64 $ 36,379.62 1 36-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 36-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color COTG Proposal B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Stapler and fax included in Admin 9301 12,750 2,250 $ 451.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. lease price. Hole puncher$18. 609.98 7,319.78 B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Hole puncher$18/mth. Police 1 9301 10,000 - $ 451.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. Stapler,fax included. 528.00 6,336.00 Included in lease-up to 17,000 Police 2 Xerox 515OPT 3,000 - $ 171.00 pages. Stapler included. 171.00 2,052.00 B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Hole puncher$18/mth. Comm Dvlp 9301 2,700 300 $ 451.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. Stapler included. 493.70 5,924.37 Included in lease-up to 17,000 PW Xerox 515OPT 1,000 - $ 171.00 pages. Stapler included. 171.00 2,052.00 B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Hole puncher$18/mth. Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Stapler included. 2,100 Rec Ctr 9301 7,000 7,000 $ 451.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. capacity. 714.88 8,578.50 Totals $ 2,688.55 $ 32,262.65 2 36-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 36-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Digital Business Technologies Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$12/mth. Stapler Admin Digital Color Copier 12,750 2,250 $ 249.00 Color $20/mth. Fax$14/mth. 484.00 5,808.00 Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$12/mth. Stapler Police 1 Digital Color Copier 10,000 - $ 249.00 Color $20/mth. Fax$14/mth. 355.00 4,260.00 Sharp MX-503N Police 2 Digital Copier 3,000 - $ 181.00 $.006/page B/W Stapler$20/mth. 219.00 2,628.00 Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$12/mth. Stapler Comm Dvlp Digital Color Copier 2,700 300 $ 249.00 Color $20/mth. 312.20 3,746.40 Sharp MX-503N PW Digital Copier 1,000 - $ 181.00 $.006/page B/W Stapler$20/mth. 207.00 2,484.00 Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$12/mth. Stapler Rec Ctr Digital Color Copier 7,000 7,000 $ 249.00 Color $20/mth. 673.00 8,076.00 Totals $ 2,250.20 $ 27,002.40 3 36-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 36-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Gordon Flesch Company Cannon Hole puncher,stapler&fax Admin imageRunner 5051 12,750 2,250 $ 400.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price 554.13 6,649.50 Cannon Hole puncher,stapler&fax Police 1 imageRunner 5051 10,000 - $ 400.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price 445.00 5,340.00 Cannon Police 2 imageRunner 4051 3,000 - $ 175.00 $0.0045/page B&W Stapler included in price. 188.50 2,262.00 Cannon Hole puncher&stapler Comm Dvlp imageRunner 5051 2,700 300 $ 382.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price 407.05 4,884.60 Cannon PW imageRunner 4051 1,000 - $ 175.00 $0.0045/page B&W Stapler included in price. 179.50 2,154.00 Cannon Hole puncher&stapler Rec Ctr imageRunner 5051 7,000 7,000 $ 346.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price. 678.50 8,142.00 Totals $ 2,452.68 $ 29,432.10 4 36-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 36-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Konica Minolta $8.50/mth hole puncher. Konica Minolta $25/mth stapler. $18.50/mth Admin Bizhub C552(Color) 12,750 2,250 $ 305.50 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color for fax. 533.75 6,405.00 $8.50/mth hole puncher. Konica Minolta $25/mth stapler. $18.50/mth Police 1 Bizhub C552(Color) 10,000 - $ 305.50 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color for fax. 407.50 4,890.00 Konica Minolta Police 2 Bizhub 552 3,000 - $ 223.50 $0.005/page B&W $25/mth stapler. 263.50 3,162.00 Konica Minolta $8.50/mth hole puncher. Comm Dvlp Bizhub C552(Color) 2,700 300 $ 305.50 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color $25/mth stapler. 367.50 4,410.00 Konica Minolta PW Bizhub 552 1,000 - $ 223.50 $0.005/page B&W $25/mth stapler. 253.50 3,042.00 Konica Minolta $8.50/mth hole puncher. Rec Ctr Bizhub C552(Color) 7,000 7,000 $ 305.50 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color $25/mth stapler. 724.00 8,688.00 Totals $ 2,549.75 $ 30,597.00 5 36-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 36-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color KKC Imaging Systems Toshiba E Studio Hole puncher,stapler&fax included Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Admin 5540C(Color) 12,750 2,250 $ 378.30 in lease price $0.0067/pg. 594.23 7,130.70 Canon IRC 5051 Hole puncher,stapler&fax included B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Admin (Color) 12,750 2,250 $ 421.95 in lease price color/pg. 715.58 8,586.90 Toshiba E Studio Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Police 1 5540C(Color) 10,000 - $ 378.30 Hole puncher&fax included in price. $0.0067/pg. 445.30 5,343.60 Canon IRC 5051 B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Police 1 (Color) 10,000 $ 423.41 Hole puncher&fax included in price. color/pg. 543.41 6,520.92 Police 2 Canon IR 4051 3,000 $ 218.25 Stapler included in lease price. B&W copies$0.009/pg. 245.25 2,943.00 Toshiba E Studio Police 2 556 3,000 $ 224.07 Stapler included in lease price. B&W$0.0067/pg. 244.17 2,930.04 Canon IRC 5051 Hole puncher,stapler included in B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Comm Dvlp (Color) 2,700 300 $ 363.75 lease price color/pg. 414.90 4,978.80 Toshiba E Studio Hole puncher,stapler included in Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Comm Dvlp 5540C(Color) 2,700 300 $ 334.65 lease price $0.0067/pg. 370.14 4,441.68 PIN Canon IR 4051 1,000 - $ 218.25 Stapler included in lease price. B&W copies$0.009/pg. 227.25 2,727.00 Toshiba E Studio PIN 556 1,000 - $ 224.07 Stapler included in lease price. B&W$0.0067/pg. 230.77 2,769.24 Canon IRC 5051 Hole puncher,stapler included in B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Rec Ctr (Color) 7,000 7,000 $ 363.75 lease price color/pg. 885.25 10,623.00 Toshiba E Studio Hole puncher,stapler included in Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Rec Ctr 5540C(Color) 7,000 7,000 $ 334.65 lease price $0.0067/pg. 787.55 9,450.60 Canon Totals $ 3,031.64 $ 36,379.62 Toshiba Totals $ 2,672.16 $ 32,065.86 6 - 0.00 36-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 36-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color McGrath Office Equipment Hole puncher,stapler,large capacity tray&fax included in Admin Savin C5502 12,750 2,250 $ 314.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. lease price. 479.00 5,748.00 Hole puncher,stapler,large capacity tray&fax included in Police 1 Savin C5502 10,000 - $ 314.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. lease price. 364.00 4,368.00 Stapler&console included in Police 2 Savin MP5002SP 3,000 - $ 168.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. lease price. 183.00 2,196.00 Hole puncher,stapler,large capacity tray included in lease Comm Dvlp Savin C5502 2,700 300 $ 299.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. price. 326.00 3,912.00 Stapler&console included in PW Savin MP5002SP 1,000 - $ 168.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. lease price. 173.00 2,076.00 Hole puncher,stapler included Rec Ctr Savin C5502 7,000 7,000 $ 287.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. in lease price. 637.00 7,644.00 Totals $ 2,162.00 $ 25,944.00 7 36-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 36-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Proven Business Systems Stapler included in price. Fax $11.88/mth. Hole puncher Admin Toshiba 5540 12,750 2,250 $ 312.98 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 $11.88/mth. 482.62 5,791.38 Stapler included in price. Fax $11.88/mth. Hole puncher Police 1 Toshiba 5540 10,000 - $ 312.98 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 $11.88/mth. 371.74 4,460.88 Police 2 Toshiba 556 3,000 - $ 211.06 B&W-$0.0035 Stapler included in price. 221.56 2,658.72 Stapler included in price. Hole Comm Dvlp Toshiba 5540 2,700 300 $ 312.98 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 puncher$11.88/mth. 347.81 4,173.72 PW Toshiba 556 1,000 - $ 211.06 B&W-$0.0035 Stapler included in price. 214.56 2,574.72 Stapler included in price. Hole Rec Ctr Toshiba 5540 7,000 7,000 $ 312.98 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 puncher$11.88/mth. 664.36 7,972.32 Totals $ 2,302.65 $ 27,631.74 8 48 - Month Lease Monthly Cost Annualized Cost Proven Business Systems $ 1,883.35 $ 22,600.14 McGrath Office Equipment $ 1,884.00 $ 22,608.00 Digital Business Technologies $ 1,988.20 $ 23,858.40 Gordon Flesch Company $ 2,077.68 $ 24,932.10 Konica Minolta $ 2,210.75 $ 26,529.00 KKC Imaging Systems Toshiba $ 2,305.58 $ 27,666.90 COTG Proposal $ 2,468.55 $ 29,622.65 KKC Imaging Systems Canon $ 2,636.88 $ 31,642.50 9 48-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 48-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color COTG Proposal B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Stapler and fax included in Admin 9301 12,750 2,250 $ 381.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. lease price. Hole puncher$15. 536.98 6,443.78 B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Hole puncher$15/mth. Police 1 9301 10,000 - $ 381.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. Stapler,fax included. 455.00 5,460.00 Police 2 Xerox 5150PT 3,000 - $ 122.00 $85/mth-up to 17,000 pages. Stapler included. 207.00 2,484.00 B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Hole puncher$15/mth. Comm Dvlp 9301 2,700 300 $ 381.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. Stapler included. 420.70 $ 5,048.37 PW Xerox 515OPT 1,000 - $ 122.00 $85/mth-up to 17,000 pages. Stapler included. 207.00 $ 2,484.00 B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Hole puncher$15/mth. Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Stapler included. 2,100 Rec Ctr 9301 7,000 7,000 $ 381.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. capacity. 641.88 7,702.50 Totals $ 2,468.55 $ 29,622.65 10 48-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 48-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Digital Business Technologies Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$9/mth. Stapler Admin Digital Color Copier 12,750 2,250 $ 208.00 Color $16/mth. Fax$12/mth. 434.00 5,208.00 Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$9/mth. Stapler Police 1 Digital Color Copier 10,000 - $ 208.00 Color $16/mth. Fax$12/mth. 305.00 3,660.00 Sharp MX-503N Police 2 Digital Copier 3,000 - $ 152.00 $.006/page B/W Stapler$16/mth. 186.00 2,232.00 Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$9/mth. Stapler Comm Dvlp Digital Color Copier 2,700 300 $ 208.00 Color $16/mth. 264.20 3,170.40 Sharp MX-503N PW Digital Copier 1,000 - $ 152.00 $.006/page B/W Stapler$16/mth. 174.00 2,088.00 Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$9/mth. Stapler Rec Ctr Digital Color Copier 7,000 7,000 $ 208.00 Color $16/mth. 625.00 7,500.00 Totals $ 1,988.20 $ 23,858.40 11 48-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 48-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Gordon Flesch Company Cannon Hole puncher,stapler&fax Admin imageRunner 5051 12,750 2,250 $ 320.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price 474.13 5,689.50 Cannon Hole puncher,stapler&fax Police 1 imageRunner 5051 10,000 - $ 320.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price 365.00 4,380.00 Cannon Police 2 imageRunner 4051 3,000 - $ 140.00 $0.0045/page B&W Stapler included in price. 153.50 1,842.00 Cannon Hole puncher&stapler Comm Dvlp imageRunner 5051 2,700 300 $ 306.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price 331.05 3,972.60 Cannon PW imageRunner 4051 1,000 - $ 140.00 $0.0045/page B&W Stapler included in price. 144.50 1,734.00 Cannon Hole puncher&stapler Rec Ctr imageRunner 5051 7,000 7,000 $ 277.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price. 609.50 7,314.00 $ 2,077.68 $ 24,932.10 12 48-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 48-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Konica Minolta $7/mth hole puncher. Konica Minolta $20.50/mth stapler. Admin Bizhub C552(Color) 12,750 2,250 $ 251.00 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color $15.25/mth for fax. 470.00 5,640.00 $7/mth hole puncher. Konica Minolta $20.50/mth stapler. Police 1 Bizhub C552(Color) 10,000 - $ 251.00 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color $15.25/mth for fax. 343.75 4,125.00 Konica Minolta Police 2 Bizhub 552 3,000 - $ 182.75 $0.005/page B&W $20.50/mth stapler. 218.25 2,619.00 Konica Minolta $7/mth hole puncher. Comm Dvlp Bizhub C552(Color) 2,700 300 $ 251.00 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color $20.50/mth stapler. 307.00 3,684.00 Konica Minolta PW Bizhub 552 1,000 - $ 182.75 $0.005/page B&W $20.50/mth stapler. 208.25 2,499.00 Konica Minolta $7/mth hole puncher. Rec Ctr Bizhub C552(Color) 7,000 7,000 $ 251.00 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color $20.50/mth stapler. 663.50 7,962.00 $ 2,210.75 $ 26,529.00 13 48-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 48-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color KKC Imaging Systems Toshiba E Studio Hole puncher,stapler&fax included Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Admin 5540C(Color) 12,750 2,250 $ 304.70 in lease price $0.0067/pg. 520.63 6,247.50 Canon IRC 5051 Hole puncher,stapler&fax included B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Admin (Color) 12,750 2,250 $ 339.30 in lease price color/pg. 632.93 7,595.10 Toshiba E Studio Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Police 1 5540C(Color) 10,000 - $ 304.20 Hole puncher&fax included in price. $0.0067/pg. 371.20 4,454.40 Canon IRC 5051 B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Police 1 (Color) 10,000 $ 339.30 Hole puncher&fax included in price. color/pg. 459.30 5,511.60 Police 2 Canon IR 4051 3,000 $ 175.50 Stapler included in lease price. B&W copies$0.009/pg. 202.50 2,430.00 Toshiba E Studio Police 2 556 3,000 $ 180.18 Stapler included in lease price. B&W$0.067/pg. 200.28 2,403.36 Canon IRC 5051 Hole puncher,stapler included in B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Comm Dvlp (Color) 2,700 300 $ 292.50 lease price color/pg. 343.65 4,123.80 Toshiba E Studio Hole puncher,stapler included in Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Comm Dvlp 5540C(Color) 2,700 300 $ 269.10 lease price $0.0067/pg. 304.59 3,655.08 PIN Canon IR 4051 1,000 - $ 175.50 Stapler included in lease price. B&W copies$0.009/pg. 184.50 2,214.00 Toshiba E Studio PIN 556 1,000 - $ 180.18 Stapler included in lease price. B&W$0.0067/pg. 186.88 2,242.56 Canon IRC 5051 Hole puncher,stapler included in B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Rec Ctr (Color) 7,000 7,000 $ 292.50 lease price color/pg. 814.00 9,768.00 Toshiba E Studio Hole puncher,stapler included in Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Rec Ctr 5540C(Color) 7,000 7,000 $ 269.10 lease price $0.0067/pg. 722.00 8,664.00 Canon Totals $ 2,636.88 $ 31,642.50 Toshiba Totals $ 2,305.58 $ 27,666.90 14 - 48-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 48-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color McGrath Office Equipment Hole puncher,stapler,large capacity tray&fax included in Admin Savin C5502 12,750 2,250 $ 260.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. lease price. 425.00 5,100.00 Hole puncher,stapler,large capacity tray&fax included in Police 1 Savin C5502 10,000 - $ 260.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. lease price. 310.00 3,720.00 Stapler&console included in Police 2 Savin MP5002SP 3,000 - $ 141.50 B&W-$0.005/pg. lease price. 156.50 1,878.00 Hole puncher,stapler,large capacity tray included in lease Comm Dvlp Savin C5502 2,700 300 $ 234.50 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. price. 261.50 3,138.00 Stapler&console included in PW Savin MP5002SP 1,000 - $ 141.50 B&W-$0.005/pg. lease price. 146.50 1,758.00 Hole puncher,stapler included Rec Ctr Savin C5502 7,000 7,000 $ 234.50 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. in lease price. 584.50 7,014.00 Totals $ 1,884.00 $ 22,608.00 15 48-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 48-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Proven Business Systems Stapler included in price. Fax $10.12/mth. Hole puncher Admin Toshiba 5540 12,750 2,250 $ 236.49 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 $10.12/mth. 402.61 4,831.26 Stapler included in price. Fax $10.12/mth. Hole puncher Police 1 Toshiba 5540 10,000 - $ 236.49 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 $10.12/mth. 291.73 3,500.76 Police 2 Toshiba 556 3,000 - $ 159.67 B&W-$0.0035 Stapler included in price. 170.17 2,042.04 Stapler included in price. Hole Comm Dvlp Toshiba 5540 2,700 300 $ 236.49 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 puncher$10.12/mth. 269.56 3,234.72 PW Toshiba 556 1,000 - $ 159.67 B&W-$0.0035 Stapler included in price. 163.17 1,958.04 Stapler included in price. Hole Rec Ctr Toshiba 5540 7,000 7,000 $ 236.49 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 puncher$10.12/mth. 586.11 7,033.32 Totals $ 1,883.35 $ 22,600.14 16 60 - Month Lease Monthly Cost Annualized Cost Proven Business Systems $ 1,646.05 $ 19,752.54 McGrath Office Equipment $ 1,692.00 $ 20,304.00 Digital Business Technologies $ 1,776.20 $ 21,314.40 Gordon Flesch Company $ 1,867.68 $ 22,412.10 Konica Minolta $ 1,962.25 $ 23,547.00 KKC Imaging Systems Toshiba $ 2,047.48 $ 24,569.70 COTG Proposal $ 2,122.55 $ 25,470.65 KKC Imaging Systems Canon $ 2,360.98 $ 28,331.70 17 60-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 60-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color COTG Proposal B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Stapler and fax included in Admin 9301 12,750 2,250 $ 308.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. lease price. Hole puncher$12. 460.98 5,531.78 B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Hole puncher$12/mth. Police 1 9301 10,000 - $ 308.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. Stapler,fax included. 379.00 4,548.00 Police 2 Xerox 5150PT 3,000 - $ 101.00 $85/mth-up to 17,000 pages. Stapler included. 186.00 2,232.00 B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Hole puncher$12/mth. Comm Dvlp 9301 2,700 300 $ 308.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. Stapler included. 344.70 4,136.37 PW Xerox 515OPT 1,000 - $ 101.00 $85/mth-up to 17,000 pages. Stapler included. 186.00 2,232.00 B/W-Tier 1$0.0059/pg. Color-25% Hole puncher$12/mth. Xerox ColorQube Tier 1 $0.0059/pg. Tier 2 50% Stapler included. 2,100 Rec Ctr 9301 7,000 7,000 $ 308.00 $0.028/pg. Tier 3 25% $0.055/pg. capacity. 565.88 6,790.50 Totals $ 2,122.55 $ 25,470.65 18 60-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 60-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Digital Business Technologies Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$8/mth. Stapler Admin Digital Color Copier 12,750 2,250 $ 174.00 Color $14/mth. Fax$7/mth. 392.00 4,704.00 Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$8/mth. Stapler Police 1 Digital Color Copier 10,000 - $ 174.00 Color $14/mth. Fax$7/mth. 263.00 3,156.00 Sharp MX-503N Police 2 Digital Copier 3,000 - $ 127.00 $.006/page B/W Stapler$14/mth. 159.00 1,908.00 Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$8/mth. Stapler Comm Dvlp Digital Color Copier 2,700 300 $ 174.00 Color $14/mth. 227.20 2,726.40 Sharp MX-503N PW Digital Copier 1,000 - $ 127.00 $.006/page B/W Stapler$14/mth. 147.00 1,764.00 Sharp MX-5110N $.006/page B/W and $.05/page for Hole punch-$8/mth. Stapler Rec Ctr Digital Color Copier 7,000 7,000 $ 174.00 Color $14/mth. 588.00 7,056.00 Totals $ 1,776.20 $ 21,314.40 19 60-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 60-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Gordon Flesch Company Cannon Hole puncher,stapler&fax Admin imageRunner 5051 12,750 2,250 $ 275.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price 429.13 5,149.50 Cannon Hole puncher,stapler&fax Police 1 imageRunner 5051 10,000 - $ 275.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price 320.00 3,840.00 Cannon Police 2 imageRunner 4051 3,000 - $ 120.00 $0.0045/page B&W Stapler included in price. 133.50 1,602.00 Cannon Hole puncher&stapler Comm Dvlp imageRunner 5051 2,700 300 $ 264.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price 289.05 3,468.60 Cannon PW imageRunner 4051 1,000 - $ 120.00 $0.0045/page B&W Stapler included in price. 124.50 1,494.00 Cannon Hole puncher&stapler Rec Ctr imageRunner 5051 7,000 7,000 $ 239.00 $0.0045/page B&W-$0.043/pg color included in price. 571.50 6,858.00 $ 1,867.68 $ 22,412.10 20 60-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 60-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Konica Minolta $6/mth hole puncher. Konica Minolta $17/mth stapler. $12.75/mth Admin Bizhub C552(Color) 12,750 2,250 $ 211.00 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color for fax. 423.00 5,076.00 $6/mth hole puncher. Konica Minolta $17/mth stapler. $12.75/mth Police 1 Bizhub C552(Color) 10,000 - $ 211.00 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color for fax. 296.75 3,561.00 Konica Minolta Police 2 Bizhub 552 3,000 - $ 153.50 $0.005/page B&W $17/mth stapler. 185.50 2,226.00 Konica Minolta $6/mth hole puncher. Comm Dvlp Bizhub C552(Color) 2,700 300 $ 211.00 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color $17/mth stapler. 262.50 3,150.00 Konica Minolta PW Bizhub 552 1,000 - $ 153.50 $0.005/page B&W $17/mth stapler. 175.50 2,106.00 Konica Minolta $6/mth hole puncher. Rec Ctr Bizhub C552(Color) 7,000 7,000 $ 211.00 $0.005/page B&W-$0.05/pg color $17/mth stapler. 619.00 7,428.00 $ 1,962.25 $ 23,547.00 21 60-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 60-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color KKC Imaging Systems Toshiba E Studio Hole puncher,stapler&fax included Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Admin 5540C(Color) 12,750 2,250 $ 252.20 in lease price $0.0067/pg. 468.13 5,617.50 Canon IRC 5051 Hole puncher,stapler&fax included B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Admin (Color) 12,750 2,250 $ 281.31 in lease price color/pg. 574.94 6,899.22 Toshiba E Studio Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Police 1 5540C(Color) 10,000 - $ 252.20 Hole puncher&fax included in price. $0.0067/pg. 319.20 3,830.40 Canon IRC 5051 B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Police 1 (Color) 10,000 $ 281.30 Hole puncher&fax included in price. color/pg. 401.30 4,815.60 Police 2 Canon IR 4051 3,000 $ 145.50 Stapler included in lease price. B&W copies$0.009/pg. 172.50 2,070.00 Toshiba E Studio Police 2 556 3,000 $ 149.38 Stapler included in lease price. B&W$0.067/pg. 169.48 2,033.76 Canon IRC 5051 Hole puncher,stapler included in B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 Comm Dvlp (Color) 2,700 300 $ 242.52 lease price color/pg. 293.67 3,524.04 Toshiba E Studio Hole puncher,stapler included in Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Comm Dvlp 5540C(Color) 2,700 300 $ 223.10 lease price $0.0067/pg. 258.59 3,103.08 PIN Canon IR 4051 1,000 - $ 145.57 Stapler included in lease price. B&W copies$0.009/pg. 154.57 1,854.84 Toshiba E Studio PIN 556 1,000 - $ 149.38 Stapler included in lease price. B&W$0.0067/pg. 156.08 1,872.96 Canon IRC 5051 Hole puncher,stapler included in B&W-$0.012/pg. $0.0625 RecCtr (Color) 7,000 7,000 $ 242.50 lease price color/pg. 764.00 9,168.00 Toshiba E Studio Hole puncher,stapler included in Color-$0.058/pg.&B&W- Rec Ctr 5540C(Color) 7,000 7,000 $ 223.10 lease price $0.0067/pg. 676.00 8,112.00 Canon Totals $ 2,360.98 $ 28,331.70 Toshiba Totals $ 2,047.48 $ 24,569.70 22 - - 60-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 60-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color McGrath Office Equipment Hole puncher,stapler,large capacity tray&fax included in Admin Savin C5502 12,750 2,250 $ 220.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. lease price. 385.00 4,620.00 Hole puncher,stapler,large capacity tray&fax included in Police 1 Savin C5502 10,000 - $ 220.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. lease price. 270.00 3,240.00 Stapler&console included in Police 2 Savin MP5002SP 3,000 - $ 122.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. lease price. 137.00 1,644.00 Hole puncher,stapler,large capacity tray included in lease Comm Dvlp Savin C5502 2,700 300 $ 198.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. price. 225.00 2,700.00 Stapler&console included in PW Savin MP5002SP 1,000 - $ 122.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. lease price. 127.00 1,524.00 Hole puncher,stapler included Rec Ctr Savin C5502 7,000 7,000 $ 198.00 B&W-$0.005/pg. Color$0.045/pg. in lease price. 548.00 6,576.00 Totals $ 1,692.00 $ 20,304.00 23 60-Month Copier Make/Model Average Volumes Lease 60-Month Maint Contract Other Features Monthly Cost Annualized Cost B&W Color Proven Business Systems Stapler included in price. Fax $8.36/mth. Hole puncher Admin Toshiba 5540 12,750 2,250 194.04 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 $8.36/mth. 356.64 4,279.62 Stapler included in price. Fax $8.36/mth. Hole puncher Police 1 Toshiba 5540 10,000 - 194.04 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 $8.36/mth. 245.76 2,949.12 Police 2 Toshiba 556 3,000 - 131.20 B&W-$0.0035 Stapler included in price. 141.70 1,700.40 Stapler included in price. Hole Comm Dvlp Toshiba 5540 2,700 300 194.04 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 puncher$8.36/mth. 225.35 2,704.20 PW Toshiba 556 1,000 - 131.20 B&W-$0.0035 Stapler included in price. 134.70 1,616.40 Stapler included in price. Hole Rec Ctr Toshiba 5540 7,000 7,000 194.04 Color-$0.045/pg. B&W-$0.0035 puncher$8.36/mth. 541.90 6,502.80 Totals $ 1,646.05 $ 19,752.54 24 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� 6 Legal ❑ Minutes #1 EST. 1&36 Finance El Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator El r� �! �© Consultant El CC 2012-33 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the City Council—March 27, 2012 Meeting and Date: City Council 4/24/12 Synopsis: Approval of minutes. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: City Clerk Warren Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY,MARCH 27,2012 Mayor Golinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Warren called the roll. Ward I Gilson Present Colosimo Present Ward II Milschewski Present Kot Present Ward III Munns Present Funkhouser Present Ward IV Spears Present Teeling Present Also present: City Clerk Warren, City Treasurer Powell, City Attorney Orr, City Administrator Olson, Deputy Chief of Police Schwartzkopf,Public Works Director Dhuse,Finance Director Fredrickson, EEI Engineer Sanderson, Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble,Director of Park and Recreation Schraw QUORUM A quorum was established. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. PRESENTATIONS Certificate of Recognition for Eagle Scout—Tyler Farnsworth Mayor Golinski presented a certificate of recognition to Tyler Farnsworth in recognition of his achievement to the rank of Eagle Scout. Tyler Farnsworth spoke about his Eagle Scout project. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mark Johnson, Georgeanna Street, came to discuss the City's budget. (See attached.) Dan Lane,Heartland, discussed the tentative agreement to purchase the Rec Center. He was happy that the Council understood the importance of the Rec Center and the programs it offers. When it is time for voting on the acceptance of this purchase,he hopes the Council will keep in mind what the Rec Center provides for the City of Yorkville. The Rec Center enriches the lives of Yorkville's citizens and increases Yorkville's property values. He understands that some of the Council members do not think this is a wise purchase. He asks that these members look at what is best for the future of Yorkville. Jesus Alaniz, Colonial Parkway, discussed last Tuesday's vote. As a poll watcher,he had the opportunity to listen to voters express their sentiment about the local government. He has little confidence in the Illinois state government. In response to Governor Quinn's statement about the need for more roofs in the state,he countered with the fact that the state has over 13,000 homes in foreclosure. He addressed the negative impact increased gas and other energy costs have had on the country. He expressed concern over the City's indebtedness, and he warned against spending for projects if it means increasing the citizen's tax burden. Lisa Peterson, Adrian Street, addressed the issue of the City's possible consideration of purchasing the Rec Center building. She believes the City managed just fine before they had the Rec Center building. She feels most citizens are in agreement that purchasing the Rec Center is a poor decision. She finds it hard to believe that the City cannot find another space to rent for the considered monthly mortgage payment of$18,333. Since citizens pay taxes for the schools, she feels the school buildings should be available to the residents for a nominal fee.At the Rec Center, citizens still pay membership dues. There are other options available for citizens who want to pay for exercise. Taxpayers don't need to subsidize this project. The Rec Center has a membership base of 1,400 residents which is 8%of Yorkville's population. The City should not be competing with private industry to fund this type of business. Personal desires and wants must be separated by what is best for the community as a whole. She believes the purchase of the Rec Center building should be put on the ballot as a referendum in November. Then The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—March 27,2012—Page 2 of 7 residents can decide if they want to spend 4.359 million dollars of taxpayer's money over the next 20 years. The City, first and foremost,needs to meet essential services before non-essential items can be added to the City's budget. She wanted to clarify that she is not against having a facility for the town to use for recreational activities. Her main issue is that the City can't afford it. Mark Johnson, Georgeanna Street,would like to challenge everyone to go to Jc Pond and take a look to the south to see what is happening with the state tax dollars on Blackberry Creek. The wetlands that the state is supposed to be protecting have been destroyed.All of the trees have been cut down. It is going to take years for that area to get back to normal.He would like to know, since the City turned down the agreement with the state, if that means the City no longer has to spend money to maintain it. He asked is it all in with the YBSD?If that is the case, does the YBSD have its own money or is the money coming from City funds?He is concerned that, in the future,the City will be stuck with the bill. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Bills for Payment-$491,230.14 (CC 2012-26) 2. Resolution 2012-008 MFT General Maintenance Appropriation Resolution for FY 2013 (PW 2012-23) 3. Request to Purchase Two Vehicles(PS 2012-05) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. So moved by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Kot. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye,Milschewski-aye, Spears-aye,Munns-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Gilson-aye, Teeling-aye,Kot-aye MINUTES FOR APPROVAL 1. Minutes of the City Council—February 28,2012(CC 2012-27) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the minutes of the regular City Council meeting for February 28,2012 as presented. So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Alderman Kot,page 1,2nd paragraph from the bottom, 1s2 line should state golf outing. Alderman Milschewski page 1, clarify John McCue was not talking during Lynn Dubajic's conversation, and year should be years. On page 4,under Ann Moehring,keep capitalization consistent on Autumn Creek and Push for the Path, clarify it was Ann's daughter.Under Jill Feishman, change I to reflect Jill Feishman. Alderman Milschewski asked that I review the last sentence of the Jill Feishman's paragraph. On page 5, second residents should be Push for the Path, and built should be build. Same paragraph, 3 lines from the bottom, change wording. The next paragraph with Lynn Dubajic should be the word write. On the same page she asked to keep the Wards consistent in how they are written. On page 6, 2nd paragraph under Alderman Spears, it should be YEDC. On page 8 of 12,under Recreation Facility, 10 lines down, it should be final. She asked City Clerk Warren to clarify the section under Recreation Facility. Page 11,motion should say base bid. Under Community and Liaison,KenCom,4th line down, least should be leased.Under Kids Fighting Cancer shavies should be spelled shavees and the year is incorrect. Alderman Gilson page 9, stated stock should be star.Under Kendall Marketplace starting with the sentence the City later met with staff and EEI Engineer Sanderson,he would like the tape reviewed. On page 9,2nd paragraph,under Kendall Marketplace,put a comma after site and take out and.Add pays. On page 9,2nd paragraph,under Kendall Marketplace, should state they are responsible for. On page 9,2nd paragraph,under Kendall Marketplace,the sentence that begins with why would the City, should end in a question mark and Alderman Gilson wants it clear that he stated this. Alderman Gilson would like the tape reviewed on page 9, starting with the sentence this would have been something that on site the City would have given the developer. On page 10,take out are, and change there to their and change there to it. Alderman Funkhouser page 6 should state there is support from the community. On page 11,Aurora Area Convention, should state good potential but we have not seen it instead of good potential that we haven't seen. Same place should state investment not investors. Mayor Golinski asked the Council if they would like the minutes to come back. Alderman Gilson requested that they come back to City Council. Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to table the minutes to the next City Council meeting. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Gilson. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Milschewski-aye, Spears-aye,Munns-aye,Funkhouser-aye, Gilson-aye, Teeling-aye,Kot-aye The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—March 27,2012—Page 3 of 7 *Alderman Colosimo was not present for the vote. REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT Ordinance Establishing Ward Redistricting and Realignment Based Upon Current Census (ADM 2011-41) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance establishing ward redistricting and realignment based upon current census and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Alderman Kot asked when this would take effect. City Administrator Olson stated the ordinance takes effect when it is passed and signed,but the actual ward maps will be implemented the next election. Alderman Spears brought up the discussion with City Administrator Olson about Teri Lane. City Administrator Olson stated Teri Lane can be switched to another district through a policy decision if the City Council chooses to do so. The entrance of Teri Lane is off Ward III. It is adjacent to Ward IV. It wouldn't hurt the individual calculations if it were moved. Alderman Spears asked if the Council could readdress this at a later time. If changes need to be made, City Administrator Olson stated this is the time to make the changes.Alderman Spears proposed that the City change Teri Lane to Ward IV. Alderman Gilson seconded the motion. Mayor Golinski asked for comments on the amendment. Alderman Funkhouser is not sure this would fit in as being one of the criteria that the committees have examined. This seems to be splitting a small piece out of one ward into another ward. Alderman Spears stated Teri Lane was originally in Ward IV. Alderman Milschewski wanted to know what is driving the change.Alderman Spears stated the residents are driving the change.Alderman Teeling has not received any e-mails, and she would like to have known that Alderman Spears received e-mails. Alderman Colosimo showed the map of the districts. Mayor Golinski said there is no rush on the ward redistricting. Alderman Gilson stated if it is contiguous to Ward IV, and the residents have expressed that they want to be served by the same alderman,he does not have a problem with that. Alderman Teeling would like to hear from the residents,too. She did not know that any of the residents had problems with the redistricting. Alderman Milschewski has not received any feedback from residents. Since it is coming into her ward, she would like to view the e-mails. Mayor Golinski asked if the Council wanted to table the ordinance or vote on the amendment. Alderman Milschewski made a motion to table the ordinance to the next City Council meeting; seconded by Alderman Colosimo. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Munns-aye Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye,Kot-aye FY13 Employee Benefits Renewal (ADM 2012-18) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to authorize staff to cancel the contract with MetLife and approve a contract with Lincoln Financial Group for life insurance,to renew a contract with Eye Med for vision insurance,to renew a contract with Blue Cross Blue Shield for dental and medical insurance,and to set non union employee contribution rates for health insurance at the following: HMO employee, employee+ spouse, employee+children coverage at 8.5%; HMO family coverage at 7.5%; PPO employee, employee+ spouse, employee+children coverage at 9.5%; and PPO family coverage at 9.0%; coverage of police department unions and public works union will remain at rates specified in their contracts. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Kot. Alderman Kot asked if this passes,will any of Yorkville's employees be paying more for their health insurance. City Administrator Olson answered,yes. Alderman Kot stated the employees that are not under contract are going to mirror the Public Works contract. Are those going up?City Administrator Olson answered,yes, it would be the same for both Public Works union employees and non-union employees. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye Ordinance Approving the 2012-2013 Fiscal Budget for the United City of Yorkville (CC 2012-10) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving the 2012-2013 fiscal budget for the United City of Yorkville and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—March 27,2012—Page 4 of 7 Mayor Golinski wanted to give Finance Director Fredrickson a public acknowledgment and thank him and his team for all the hard work they did on the budget. Mayor Golinski thanked all the department heads,the staff, and City Administrator Olson for all the work they have done on this year's budget. This is the first year the City has done a five-year budget. This will give the Council multiple years to address any problems it sees on the horizon.Mayor Golinski thanked the City Council for all they have accomplished in the last 10 months, and he wanted to point out the Council's accomplishments. The City's tax rate has been lowered by 30%, and property taxes are expected to go down each year through 2015. The City has erased its negative fund balance, and the City will finish 2012 with a higher surplus. The proposed fiscal year 13 budget also anticipates a surplus, so the City is building its fund balance. The county is going to help with the River Road Bridge funding. The City should be close to the 15% fund balance in fiscal year 13 for the first time since 2008. The City was able to hire three new officers in fiscal year 12. The City is adding a sergeant in fiscal year 13 and one officer per year through 2017. The City is quadrupling its road maintenance budget from 50,000 to 200,000 in fiscal year 13. The Rec Center budget will be a huge improvement for fiscal year 11 to 12. Only a small deficit is expected. The City and its budget are moving in the right direction. Mayor Golinski wanted to remind everyone that the City's financial problems were not created overnight,and they are not going to be fixed overnight. Alderman Kot requested the staff put together numbers of surrounding communities in regards to what they pay their employees and for the raises the employees receive. He hopes the Council will take a good look at this, and he hopes the Council will review this again in six months. The City of Yorkville's employees have gone four years without a pay raise, and now some may see a slight increase in pay with their healthcare cost. Alderman Gilson discussed the Countryside TIF debt,and the fact that in fiscal year 18 the City is looking to be upside down. He discussed refinancing the Countryside TIF. He discussed the Rob Roy sewer bans, and he is against adding$8.25 to the citizen sewer bills. He discussed the building permits, and he wanted to know if the City budgeted on 65 building permits or on the original 30 building permits. City Administrator Olson stated the City budgeted for 35 whole permits. The 30 permits that are in the build program do not need to be budgeted. Alderman Gilson read part of the budget addressing streetscapes, and he wanted to know how the City would budget for streetscapes. He wanted to know where the money is coming from if the TIF funds do not cover streetscapes. City Administrator Olson stated the comment was related to last year's memo, and stated that the City is not proposing in fiscal year 13 to either bond or pay for the Route 47 expansion costs upfront. It will be stretched over 10 years.Alderman Gilson wanted to know the update on the Beecher Center, HVAC, and City Administrator Olson stated there is no update. Alderman Gilson discussed Fox Hill water and sewer recapture. He wanted to know when the City is due to completely pay off the Fox Hill recapture. The answer was 2023. He wanted to know how much interest the City would accumulate waiting to 2023 to pay that off. City Administrator Olson stated the total obligation was $3,000,000 or$4,000,000. Alderman Gilson discussed the West Ridge water main replacement, and he wanted to know if that has been accounted for in the budget. City Administrator Olson answered no. Alderman Gilson recommended adding budget provisions for the Sunflower Estates Subdivision storm sewer flooding issue. Public Works Director Dhuse estimated the cost at$125,000. Alderman Spears questioned if this was the time that the Council should go through the budget line by line for consensus. Mayor Golinski stated budgetary concerns should have been sent to staff in writing for explanation for budgetary items. Alderman Milschewski asked for confirmation that the items Alderman Gilson discussed were not included in the budget. City Administrator Olson confirms that to be the case. Alderman Colosimo is aware of the importance of the items listed under future obligations. The Council has to decide what should be included in this budget knowing that it is impractical to think the Council can include everything. Certain items will have to remain as policy decisions.Alderman Gilson asked City Administrator Olson to provide the estimated budgetary surplus. City Administrator Olson stated with the items as originally budgeted the surplus would be $748,000. Adopting the changes discussed increases the surplus to $900,000. Alderman Gilson prefers to address the much needed repairs than build a larger surplus.Alderman Colosimo said a priority needs to be established for City projects as to what should be done first. Alderman Kot said the auditors want to see a budgetary surplus. Finance Director Frederickson said the auditors view budgetary policy as a management issue. City Administrator Olson said that past auditors recommended a 50%fund balance. The City's current policy is a 15 to 25%fund balance.Mayor Golinski stated it should be the Council's priority to reach a 15%fund balance,which is our current policy. After that is met,the Council can address other issues. Alderman Kot stated once the City has achieved its fund balance requirement, additional budgetary items can be addressed. Alderman Kot and Alderman Gilson discussed possible changes to health insurance benefits for Council members.Alderman Teeling stated both the insurance benefits and establishing eligibility parameters for free senior garbage pickup were intended to be discussed in the Administration Committee meeting,but it never was. She feels the surplus is established to address the items the Council determines to be the highest priority. Alderman Milschewski asked City Administrator Olson to confirm the amount budgeted for healthcare benefits.Alderman Munns addressed the healthcare benefits. Alderman Spears addressed the healthcare benefits and gave the history The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—March 27,2012—Page 5 of 7 as recorded from past City Council meetings and the history of the elected officials past voting record. She has been surveying healthcare benefit packages currently offered by neighboring communities. Mayor Golinski recommends discussion of healthcare benefits should be addressed at another time. Alderman Gilson prefers to address them now. He discussed healthcare benefits and the importance of these benefits as part of the total compensation package. Mayor Golinski recommends a line item of$150,000 added to the budget for employee raises. He asked for a consensus among the alderman. In favor of employee raises Alderman Milschewski,Alderman Funkhouser,Alderman Colosimo,Alderman Munns,Alderman Kot, and Alderman Teeling. Alderman Spears and Alderman Gilson had reservations, and they prefer to wait to see how other budgetary items are addressed before making their decision. Alderman Colosimo wanted to point out that this is not only an issue of needing to compensate staff,but this is also a cost benefit analysis for the long term of the municipality. It is going to save the City money. Mayor Golinski stated it sounds like a consensus, and the budget can always be modified. Alderman Gilson discussed the Kennedy Road trail. If there is a shortfall on that$357,000,where is it covered in this budget? City Administrator Olson stated when they produced the document, it hadn't been budgeted. It is to be determined. Alderman Gilson,Mayor Golinski,Alderman Colosimo, and City Administrator Olson had discussion on the Beecher Center Park and its removal in 2013 or 2014. Alderman Gilson covered the following budget issues with City Administrator Olson. He wants the City Council to consider all of these priority issues and to think about the surplus the City is going to have. The following issues were discussed: pari-mutuel tax for the off track betting facility, special engineering services,Route 47 expansion contingencies, Sunflower SSA, Illinois job proceeds, development fee under Public Works capital fund,Parks and Rec capital funds,water infrastructure fee,water connection fees, equipment, Rob Roy sewer payments,Windett Ridge sewer recapture,grants, and property taxes for the library.Alderman Gilson discussed the cash flow surplus deficit. He believes the Council should take its contingencies and spend it on necessity items. He discussed mosquito control. He discussed the tree replacement program. He suggested that money should be spent to make more trees available. He discussed maintenance cost in the budget. Alderman Gilson brought up the Police Pension Fund, and there was discussion. Alderman Colosimo asked if the City has looked at the possibility of refinancing other bonds. City Attorney Orr stated the City monitors that constantly. Alderman Gilson discussed the YBSD collection fee, and he wanted to know why the huge increase in the collection fee. He discussed the Administration Department. Training and conferences were discussed between Alderman Gilson and City Administrator Olson. He also discussed postage and shipping. Alderman Teeling wanted to know if the Council could take care of the suggestions from Alderman Gilson now. Mayor Golinski feels this is a good budget. He would like to bring it up for a vote. If a Council member doesn't agree with what is in the budget,then they have to right to vote no. The Council can always revisit this budget. The staff feels this is a good budget. The Council is currently looking at fiscal year 13. Anything after that is highly speculative and based on very conservative assumptions. He asked Alderman Gilson if he had any other comments.Alderman Gilson responded by saying that if that is the philosophy,then he will stop and vote no on the budget.Mayor Golinski stated that Alderman Gilson has had three months to ask questions to the staff. Alderman Spears stated that Alderman Gilson asked when he could go over the budget line item by line item. The budget is the most that this Council individually would have to pay attention to and check. She would like to see the Council go over the budget line item by line item once again next year.Mayor Golinski agreed that the budget is very important. That is why the City started the budget process two months earlier than normal. He asked the Council members to submit their questions to staff. Alderman Colosimo stated reviewing the budget process is a learning curve. He thinks the budget is heading in the right direction. He doesn't want to force Council members to vote on a budget when they haven't had their questions answered. He would like the Council members to have their questions answered. Mayor Golinski stated everyone is not going to agree with everything in the budget. Alderman Gilson feels that each proposal should be voted on,and if that is not going to occur,then all the Council has accomplished is voting no on the budget. Mayor Golinski stated the City has a professional staff to prepare the budget. Alderman Colosimo made a motion to table the budget to the next City Council meeting; seconded by Alderman Gilson. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-2 Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye,Gilson-aye,Kot-nay,Munns-nay Fox Hill and Sunflower Estates SSA for Mowing and Maintenance—Bid Award (CC 2012-28) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to award the contract for the Fox Hill and Sunflower Estates SSA mowing and maintenance to the T.L.C. Group LTD, as presented. So moved by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Colosimo. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—March 27,2012—Page 6 of 7 Alderman Munns wanted to know how it compared to last year. City Administrator Olson answered it was cheaper. Alderman Colosimo stated the City has had several bids. There were two bids that came in at the exact same amount, and one was a local company. The bid that is recommended that the City accepts is a company out of Bolingbrook,which had the same exact amount as the company in Yorkville. He would like to give the City's business to a local company.Alderman Kot agrees,but he doesn't believe that everything is equal. Public Works Director Dhuse recommended the company in Bolingbrook because the mulching and labor price was on the extra list. Mulching will be done this year. There will be general maintenance this year, and that is why he made this selection. He would have liked to have gone with the company in Yorkville,but their price was higher. Alderman Colosimo is concerned about the quality of this company in Bolingbrook. Public Works Director Dhuse stated he did check on this company before making the recommendation to use them.Alderman Funkhouser stated with his background,he has reviewed many of these bids in the past. He knows that there is a lot of flexibility and mark up in those numbers. It is a responsible bid. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye, Spears-aye PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PARK BOARD No report. PLAN COMMISSION No report. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS No report. CITY COUNCIL REPORT No report. CITY CLERK'S REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY&LIAISON REPORT Agency on Aging Alderman Spears reported on the Agency on Aging. (See attached.) KenCom Alderman Spears reported on KenCom. (See attached.) Library Alderman Colosimo said the library is grateful to the City for working with them in restructuring their budget. They voiced their agreement of sticking to the 25,000 a year increment until further notice. Push For The Path Alderman Teeling reported on Push for the Path. She spoke on the power of one. There are 43 teams now committed to raising$1,000 each. White Water Ice Cream held an event where it pledged$0.50 for every ticket that was written up. Three hundred tickets were written, so the company sent in$150.00. There was a jar set up for Push for the Path which raised$167. It was a great event. There was a packed event today at Patellis. Twenty five percent of the tickets went to Push for the Path. There will be an event held on April 13, 2012, at Cobblestone Bakery&Bistro. They will have two bands and wine tasting. Ten dollars of every ticket sold will go to Push for the Path. They are hoping to sell at least 100 tickets. Alderman Teeling appreciates all the businesses and all the individuals that have signed up for the power of one. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—March 27,2012—Page 7 of 7 Kids Fighting Cancer Mayor Golinski attended the St. Baldrick's fundraiser on St. Patrick's Day. He was a shavee. The St. Baldrick's Foundation raises money for childhood cancer research. He ended up shaving his mustache which raised$250.00. St. Baldricks raised$10,000 on St.Patrick's Day. Meals On Wheels Mayor Golinski stated as part of Meals on Wheels,he had the honor of delivering meals for Yorkville's homebound seniors. Meals on Wheels had a campaign in March called March for Meals. Mayors for Meals was part of that. Trivia Night Alderman Spears reported on trivia night which will be presented by the Kendall County Association of Chief of Police. It will be held at the American Legion at 7:00 in Oswego on June 09, 2012. All proceeds will go to the Kendall County SRT. Trivia teams will consist of no more than 10 people, and they are only accepting 10 teams. If interested, contact the Oswego Police Department.Mayor Golinski stated the last team Alderman Spears put together took first place. STAFF REPORT No report. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS City Council Minutes Alderman Spears brought up the discussion of how minutes of the City Council meetings should be corrected. She suggested that the Council submit their corrections to City Clerk Warren, and then City Clerk Warren can correct them and give the alderman a draft copy.Alderman Colosimo stated it would need to be a two step process. City Attorney On stated it is supposed to be approved within 30 days. The typos and misspelled words can be given to City Clerk Warren,but anything that has to do with content needs to be done at the City Council meeting. Alderman Milschewski stated they shouldn't be approved until all the corrections are made. Alderman Colosimo recommended that the Council should continue to correct the minutes the way the Council has been correcting them. Then give City Clerk Warren a copy for her records. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to go into Executive Session for the purpose of litigation. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Munns. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Spears-aye, Milschewski-aye, Colosimo-aye,Kot-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Munns-aye The City Council entered Executive Session at 10:07 p.m. The City Council returned to regular session at 10:25 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to adjourn the meeting. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. Adjournment of the meeting was unanimously approved by a viva voce vote. Meeting adjourned at 10:26 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Beth Warren, City Clerk, City of Yorkville, Illinois 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� 6 Legal ❑ Minutes #2 EST. 1&36 Finance El Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator El r� �! �© Consultant El CC 2012-34 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the City Council—April 10, 2012 Meeting and Date: City Council 4/24/12 Synopsis: Approval of minutes. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: City Clerk Warren Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY,APRIL 10,2012 Mayor Golinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Warren called the roll. Ward I Gilson Present Colosimo Present Ward II Milschewski Present Kot Present Ward III Munns Present Funkhouser Present Ward IV Spears Present Teeling Present Also present: City Clerk Warren, City Treasurer Powell, City Attorney Orr, City Administrator Olson, Police Chief Hart,Deputy Chief of Police Hilt,Public Works Director Dhuse,Finance Director Fredrickson,EEI Engineer Freeman, Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble,Director of Park and Recreation Schraw QUORUM A quorum was established. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Alderman Gilson requested that Item#EDC 2012-15 on the consent agenda be taken off for discussion. Mayor Golinski requested that Mayor's Report# 1 Proclamation for Autism be moved to presentations. Amendment approved unanimously by a viva voce vote. PRESENTATIONS Proclamation for Autism Awareness Month (CC 2012-31) Mayor Golinski read the proclamation for autism awareness and proclaimed the month of April 2012, as autism awareness month in the United City of Yorkville. Alderman Teeling stated that on April 20,2012,Nanette's Boutique is having a benefit for autism. Laura Langston from Langston Pediatric Therapy announced that on April 28,2012,there will be an autism awareness walk taking place at Silver Springs Park. If anyone is interested in sponsoring or donating, they would greatly appreciate the support. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. CITIZEN COMMENTS Walt Stagner,Wildwood II, came representing himself and his wife. He wanted to voice their support for George Gilson,their alderman. They believe Alderman Gilson is very well informed on the issues of the City. Alderman Gilson makes sure his constituents are well informed, as well. Mr. Stagner thanked Alderman Gilson, and he stated they support Alderman Gilson 100%. Jesus Alaniz, Colonial Parkway,was a little displeased when he listened to budget discussions from the last City Council meeting.He disagrees with the politics that Council members used for trying to shame other Council members for receiving healthcare benefits. He feels members of the Council and staff work very hard for the City, and deserves these benefits. He hopes the Council will deeply consider the proposed budget and appropriately deal with the portions that consist of the greatest amount of spending. Kathy Neddo,Windett Ridge, opposed healthcare benefits for Council members for last year's budget as well as this year's budget. There are important issues being ignored,like roads and infrastructure,because of the cost. The Council continues to take this benefit. Senior discounted trash pickup,without any stipulations,is wrong, and cost the City money. The combined cost of these two policies is approximately $300,000 a year. She asked the members to please consider opting out of the healthcare benefit. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 10,2012—Page 2 of 5 Ordinance 2012-06 Approving a Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area(Imperial Investments,LLC) (EDC 2012-15) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving a redevelopment agreement for the downtown Yorkville redevelopment project area(Imperial Investments,LLC). So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Alderman Gilson pulled this ordinance off the consent agenda for clarification purposes.At the end of the agreement, it states that it is an Illinois liability company. The word limited should be added before liability. He received information that three of the different pin numbers on this agreement were incorrect. The three incorrect pin numbers were for Cobblestone property,the West Van Emmon property, and the 306 and 308 Heustis property. These properties are not on the county's website. City Administrator Olson stated it is possible that it was an old pin number that the City had on file. When the budget update is handled,the records will be updated accordingly.Alderman Gilson wants to verify that those parcel numbers are correct. City Attorney Orr stated that will be done. Alderman Gilson supports this ordinance, and he hopes the City can get the downtown revamped. He asked if the TIF funding has any restrictions in terms of how dollars are used. City Attorney Orr stated the TIF Act has serious restrictions as to how they may use the money. There is constant reference to eligible redevelopment project cost. The process to get the reimbursement is a submittal of actual cost which is reviewed by staff and City Attorney Orr. They make sure there is not one cost that doesn't meet the requirements of the TIF Act. Before the City signs the agreement,Alderman Gilson would like to know that the pin numbers are correct.Alderman Funkhouser feels this is a great redevelopment program. This is a prime example of how a TIF should work. The majority of the improvements have been done. The City is going to see an immediate improvement in the area without having to put out a risk. Alderman Funkhouser is glad to see that Imperial Investments have done such a great job of being proactive on Yorkville's downtown. Alderman Munns stated this was approved unanimously through the EDC Committee. The Council has been trying for 10 years to re-develop Yorkville's downtown area. It is good to see something positive taking place. Alderman Spears said the City was burned with the TIF on Route 47 and Route 34. The developer went belly up. She never thought she would support another TIF. Looking at the developer and their goals, she would stand 100%behind them. Alderman Gilson asked if the Council is voting on this ordinance as amended after verification of the pin numbers. City Attorney Orr stated the Council is voting on the ordinance as it is. If the pin numbers are wrong,they will be corrected. Mayor Golinski will not sign the document until instructed to do so. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Gilson-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye, Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye CONSENT AGENDA 1. Bills for Payment-$762,680.96 (CC 2012-29) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the consent agenda as amended. So moved by Alderman Funkhouser; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-1 Colosimo-aye,Milschewski-aye, Spears-aye,Munns-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Gilson-nay, Teeling-aye,Kot-aye MINUTES FOR APPROVAL 1. Minutes of the City Council—February 28,2012(CC 2012-27) 2. Minutes of the City Council—March 13, 2012 (CC 2012-30) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the minutes of the regular City Council for February 28, 2012, and March 13, 2012,as presented. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Spears. Amendments approved unanimously by a viva voce vote. REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT Ordinance 2012-07 Establishing Ward Redistricting and Realignment Based Upon Current Census (ADM 2011-41) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance establishing ward redistricting and realignment based upon current census and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute. So moved by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Spears. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 10,2012—Page 3 of 5 Alderman Spears wanted to know if the alderman received e-mails from residents of Teri Lane.Mayor Golinski stated there are residents on Teri Lane who wanted to continue to be in Ward IV. Alderman Funkhouser presented slides to the Council which showed the Teri Lane alternative and its location. Alderman Funkhouser showed the slide which proposed his two changes. The changes were for a clean division going with Route 47 and Route 34 as the changes.Alderman Spears had a question concerning the population of Teri Lane. She was told Heartland had 200 homes. She stated the City is talking 200 homes compared to 20 homes. With the proposed redistricting,Ward IV is now going to be the smallest ward. Alderman Colosimo doesn't have an objection to Teri Lane remaining in Ward 1V. He has a problem with the entirety of Heartland being moved.Alderman Kot has no objection with Teri Lane staying in Ward IV. He has a problem with the process. The City had a public hearing, and now, after the fact,the City is making changes. If changes are made, does the City have to have another public hearing? City Administrator Olson answered,no. Alderman Kot believes this should have been discussed prior to this point.Now the people who attended the public hearing will not know the specifics of what they are voting on. He prefers to stick with what the City Council already had discussed.Alderman Gilson stated if Alderman Spear's constituents would like to keep her as their Alderman,he supports that. He does not support Heartland being moved into Ward IV. Alderman Munns clarified with City Administrator Olson that even thought the City has had a public hearing; the Council can change this in any way. City Administrator Olson answered,yes.Alderman Munns wanted to know the point of having a public hearing. City Administrator Olson stated it is to gather input on the initial proposal.Alderman Funkhouser stated that the only reason he proposed those two changes was to keep clear boundaries. He doesn't have a problem with it as it is. Teri Lane is the only consideration;he understands that the residents do want that. This is one area that doesn't fit with the geographic boundaries that were developed. Of the upper wards, the only thing Alderman Funkhouser was looking at was the geographic boundaries. The concern is if the City varies from the original parameters that the City implied. Mayor Golinski likes Alderman Funkhouser's map from a geographic standpoint,but the population shift is huge. Ward IV is still the fastest growing ward in the City. It would take years to add 3,200 people. Alderman Colosimo moved to amend the proposed map to add Teri Lane to Ward IV; seconded by Alderman Gilson.Mayor Golinski stated the City Council is voting on the motion to add Teri Lane to alternate number two of the proposed map. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-5 Nays-3 Munns-aye Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-nay, Milschewski-nay, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye, Kot-nay Mayor Golinski stated now the City Council needs to vote on the map as amended. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-5 Nays-3 Munns-aye Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-nay, Milschewski-nay, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye, Kot-nay Mayor Golinski stated the City has new ward districts with Teri Lane in Ward IV, and all the rest as presented.Alderman Munns explained this means residents are going to be voting in the new wards during the next election, even though they don't take effect until the next election. Ordinance 2012-08 Approving the 2012-2013 Fiscal Budget for the United City of Yorkville (CC 2012-10) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving the 2012-2013 fiscal budget for the United City of Yorkville and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Spears; so moved by Alderman Milschewski. Alderman Colosimo discussed the budget process. He is glad this process started earlier than normal,but would like to add an extra day to go over the budget line item by line item. He believes this budget is a step in the right direction, and he is happy that the budget gives a five year projection. He will be supporting the budget as presented. Alderman Kot and City Administrator Olson discussed the money budgeted for employee raises. If approved,raises will go into effect on May V. This will allow enough time to work with the unions. That money will allow for a 2%raise across the board. There was discussion among Alderman Gilson, City Administrator Olson,Alderman Teeling, and Mayor Golinski in regards to the $8.25 sewer fee and the surplus allocation. Alderman Gilson asked about using the surplus to erase the possibility of the sewer fee. City Administrator Olson stated the City can use many funding sources legally, in the City,to transfer into the sewer department to defray any surplus or deficit in the fund. Alderman Gilson believes the residents will object to the sewer fee.Mayor Golinski stated this will not be done this budget cycle. This is not being voted on now, and does not commit the City to doing anything with the fee. The budget can be amended in the future. When looking into future years, Alderman Teeling pointed out that the surplus money is basically spent. Mayor Golinski said the City is trying to build up the fund balance this year and next year. The goal is to get up to a 15%fund balance. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 10,2012—Page 4 of 5 In fiscal year 2015,the City has some huge capital projects that are in the budget.Alderman Gilson had several questions for the staff. He wanted to know why the supply cost in the Community Development department for the proposed fiscal year budget was almost double what it has been in the past. Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble stated the City combined engineering and development, so the fees that were being paid out of the engineering budget ended up being rolled over into the Community Development's budget. Alderman Gilson feels the City needs to cut training and conference expenses.He asked about publishing and advertising under the Community Development budget. There was a large jump in spending. He wanted to know why that occurred. Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble stated they anticipate amendments to the ordinances, and that is a fee that comes to her department. Alderman Gilson asked why is the cost$140,000 in the proposed fiscal year 2013? City Administrator Olson stated the City spent$60,000 this year on City servers,police servers, and general I.T. outsourcing. Some of this was out of contingency and some was out of professional services. The additional $80,000 is planned for mobile data terminal updates for the police and virtualization survey. Alderman Gilson asked if the City received an answer as to why the contractual services are so much higher than normal. City Administrator Olson answered,it depends on each department. Alderman Gilson believes the current budget does not allow for numerous needed infrastructure improvements. He recommends sacrificing some of the budget surplus to reduce a future insurmountable debt that will incur by delaying necessary improvements. Alderman Gilson maintains that there are important line items that should be voted on individually by the Council. He believes the current budget is flawed, and the current budget ignores many issues that can cause a great deal of debt in the future. Alderman Spears believes that the annual budget is the most important item the Council will address during the course of the year. She would like to see the Council return to the practice of meeting for an entire day to discuss each budgetary item line by line. She understands this process may seem tedious,but it is still the best way to insure the Council member's address the issues most important to their constituents.Alderman Gilson added that because the budget includes certain acquisitions,it will impact budget funding.Alderman Teeling asked if the library levy is set. City Administrator Olson stated because revenues are estimated,the Library Board and Council have to pass a library levy each year. This issue is only addressed after a budget is established. City Administrator Olson clarifies that though the motion is to approve the budget,there is also a provision for amending the budget to include the Library Board budget. City Attorney Orr clarifies that the motion to approve the budget includes the amendments recommended by the Council over the last several weeks. Alderman Munns commended the staff's efforts in creating the City budget.Mayor Golinski stated in reviewing past minutes the Council began discussing this budget at the end of June 2011. He acknowledges the budget is not perfect,but it is the best budget the City has seen in four years. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-2 Spears-nay, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-nay,Kot-aye,Munns-aye PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PARK BOARD No report. PLAN COMMISSION No report. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS No report. CITY COUNCIL REPORT No report. CITY CLERK'S REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY&LIAISON REPORT YBSD The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 10,2012—Page 5 of 5 Alderman Gilson stated the YBSD had an informational meeting on April 3,2012, concerning the Blackberry Dam removal. Alderman Gilson was unable to attend,but he spoke to a resident that attended. The resident stated the YBSD still has three major concerns. The major concerns were a rock along the edge of the property and creek,the project getting finished,the kayak shoot and the land sold to the City for recreational attractions. Also,the YBSD was concerned the land can be purchased between the new creek and the property owner's land. Push For The Path Alderman Teeling reported on Push for the Path. Citizens can go on the Push for the Path Facebook page and get updates for the power of one. There is an event on Friday April 13, 2012, at Cobblestone Bakery &Bistro. Tickets are available for$40. These tickets include two concerts, food, and wine tasting. Ten dollars of each ticket goes to Push for the Path. There is an event at Bounce Town on May 07, 2012, and an event at Rosati's Pizza on April 25,2012,from 5:00-10:00. A portion of citizen's purchases goes to Push for the Path. Ward III Meeting Alderman Munns stated that he and Alderman Funkhouser will be having a Ward III meeting on May 5, 2012, from 10:00-12:00 at Rush Copley in the community room. Illinois Association of Community Care Program Alderman Spears reported on the Illinois Association of Community Care Program. (See attached.) Community Cares Program (CCP) Alderman Spears reported on the Community Cares Program(CCP). (See attached.) Community Cares Eligibility Cuts Alderman Spears reported on the Community Care Eligibility Cuts. (See attached.) Baseball With The Mayor Mayor Golinski will be having baseball with the Mayor on Thursday April 12,2012, 5:30-7:00 at Steven Bridge Park field number 3. Citizens are welcome to attend. STAFF REPORT No report. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to go into Executive Session for the purpose of: 1. Litigation. 2. Sale or lease of real property. 3. Collective negotiation matters. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Spears-aye, Milschewski-aye, Colosimo-aye,Kot-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye, Funkhouser-aye,Munns-aye The City Council entered Executive Session at 8:26 p.m. The City Council returned to regular session at 8:46 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to adjourn the meeting. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Munns. Adjournment of the meeting was unanimously approved by a viva voce vote. Meeting adjourned at 8:47 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Beth Warren, City Clerk, City of Yorkville, Illinois Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number .'� •s► Legal ■❑ Mayor#1 Finance EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number m Human Resources ❑ �s =Q Community Development El 2012-35 ` Police ❑ ALE ��' Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Ordinance Approving 2nd Intergov.Agreement for the Replacement of the River Road Bridge Meeting and Date: City Council April 24, 2012 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 3/13/12 Action Taken: City Council approval of second intergovernmental agreement. Item Number: CC 2012-17 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid W3s From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: April 20, 2012 C<wrMY Sad ALE � Subject: River Road Intergovernmental Agreement Summary Approval of an amended version of the River Road Bridge intergovernmental agreement, to reconcile versions of the agreement previously approved by the City Council and County Board. Background The City Council approved a first amendment to the River Road Bridge intergovernmental agreement at the March 13th meeting. Shortly thereafter, the County Board approved an intergovernmental agreement, with the same general structure as the City's,but with 5 extra pages of additional language. City staff has reviewed the County's 10 page intergovernmental agreement and has found it to be congruent with the City's intergovernmental agreement. However, because there are 5 new pages, the City Council should reapprove the agreement so that both the City's and the County's agreements are identical. Staff recommendation Staff recommends approval of the agreement, as passed by the County Board. Ordinance No. 2012- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,APPROVING THE SECOND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE RIVER ROAD BRIDGE OVER BLACKBERRY CREEK,YORKVILLE, IL WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City previously entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement for the Replacement of the River Road Bridge Over Blackberry Creek(the "Agreement") dated January 18, 2011 with Kendall County(the "County"); and, WHEREAS,the City and the County desire to amend the Agreement in order to set forth additional obligations required of each party in regard to the replacement of the River Road Bridge over Blackberry Creek. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That the Second Intergovernmental Agreement for the Replacement of the River Road Bridge Over Blackberry Creek, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT 1 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2012. MAYOR 2 1(1 Ism I a-Oq SECOND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE RIVER ROAD BRIDGE OVER BLACKBERRY CREEK,YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS THIS SECOND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT ("the Agreement") by and between the County of Kendall, a unit of local government of the State of Illinois ("Kendall County") and the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the "City") a municipal corporation of the State of Illinois. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970, Article VII, Section 10, provides that units of local government may contract or otherwise associate among themselves to obtain or share services and to exercise, combine, or transfer any power or function in any manner not prohibited by law or by ordinance and may use their credit, revenues, and other resources to pay costs related to intergovernmental activities; and WHEREAS, the City and Kendall County are units of local government within the meaning of Article VII, Section 1 of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 who are authorized to enter into intergovernmental agreements pursuant to the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, 5 ILCS 220/1 et seq.; and WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, 5 ILCS 220/1 et seq., provides that any county may participate in an intergovernmental agreement under this Act notwithstanding the absence of specific authority under the State law to perform the service involved, provided that the unit of local government contracting with Kendall County has authority to perform the service; and WHEREAS, on or about January 18, 2011, Kendall County and the City (the "Parties") entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement for the Replacement of the River Road Bride Over 1 Blackberry Creek (the "First Agreement"). In the First Agreement, the Parties agreed to combine funds received by the City from the Illinois Department of Transportation's Major Bridge Program with funds received by Kendall County from the Federal Highway Bridge Program and other funds in order to undertake the replacement of the River Road Bridge over Blackberry Creek(the "Project")pursuant to the terms and conditions stated therein; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3 of the First Agreement, Kendall County agreed to fund eighty percent (80%) of the total cost of Preliminary Engineering and Design Engineering for the Project. Kendall County further agreed to advance one hundred percent (100%) of the total cost for the Preliminary Engineering and Design Engineering, and the City agreed to reimburse Kendall County in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the total cost for the preliminary engineering and design engineering on or before April 30, 2012; and, WHEREAS, since the execution of the First Agreement, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement as a supplement to the First Agreement and for the purpose of completing all remaining tasks and financing of the Project, which the Parties agree are reasonably necessary to complete the Project and to provide a safe and efficient roadway network for the benefit of the residents of the City and Kendall County. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. The foregoing preambles are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as if fully restated in this Section 1. Section 2. In addition to the City's obligations as set forth in the First Agreement, the City agrees to perform all of the following additional obligations pursuant to the terms of this Agreement: 2 A. The City shall construct and complete the Project in accordance with the final engineering plans and all other approvals as may be required by the Illinois Department of Transportation ("IDO7"), the Federal Highway Bridge Program and all other applicable local ordinances, state and federal laws. The Parties agree that construction of the Project is scheduled to proceed upon execution of the Agreement, and the Parties anticipate final completion of the Project by January 1, 2013. B. The City shall comply with all competitive bidding and selection requirements necessary for construction and completion of the Project pursuant to applicable state and federal laws; C. The City shall select and contract with all contractors and subcontractors necessary to complete the construction of the Project; D. The City shall be solely responsible for supervising the construction and completion of the Project and of all contractors and subcontractors retained by the City to assist in the construction and completion of the Project. E. The City shall be responsible for reimbursing Kendall County for the costs and attorneys' fees expended by Kendall County for land acquisition as set forth in Section 3A below. F. The City acknowledges that the work to be performed by the City and the City's contractors and subcontractors are subject to the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act, 820 lLCS 130/1 et seq. ("Prevailing Wage Act"). The City agrees to fully comply with all applicable requirements of the Prevailing Wage Act, and the City agrees to notify all contractors and subcontractors that the work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be subject to the Prevailing Wage Act. In the event that the City fails to comply with the notice requirements set forth in this Paragraph, 3 the City shall be solely responsible for any and all penalties, fines and liabilities incurred for contractors' and/or subcontractors' violations of the Prevailing Wage Act. G. The City shall ensure that each contractor and/or subcontractor performing work on the Project shall obtain and continue in force during the term of the Project, all insurance necessary and appropriate and that each contractor and/or subcontractor contracted with shall name Kendall County as an Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory basis with respect to the general liability, business auto liability and excess liability insurance, as well as a waiver of subrogation with respect to the general liability and workers' compensation in favor of Kendall County. Section 3. In addition to all of Kendall County's obligations under the First Agreement, Kendall County agrees to perform all of the following additional obligations pursuant to the terms of this Agreement: A. Kendall County shall undertake the acquisition of such interests in real estate, including temporary or permanent easements or fee ownership, which Kendall County deems necessary for the City to construct the replacement of the River Road Bridge over Blackberry Creek. Kendall County shall pay all costs and attorneys' fees expended in connection with such land acquisition, and the City shall reimburse Kendall County for all costs and attorneys' fees expended by Kendall County for land acquisition pursuant to the payment schedule set forth in Section 6 below. B. Kendall County shall lend to the City an amount not to exceed five hundred thousand dollars and zero cents ($500,000.00) with no interest for the costs necessary to complete all aspects of the Project including, but not limited to, the costs incurred for the design engineering, land acquisition, construction engineering, and construction of the Project. The 4 parties understand and agree that this $500,000.00 loan amount includes all monies expended by Kendall County pursuant to the terms of the First Agreement and this Second Agreement. Any fees and costs incurred for the Project that exceed the $500,000.00 loan amount shall be the sole responsibility of the City and shall be paid by the City. Section 4. As of the date of execution of this Agreement, the City anticipates the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) shall advance all funds necessary for the City to construct and complete the Project, and the City shall reimburse IDOT in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the total amount advanced by IDOT for completion of the Project. Upon the City's receipt of an invoice from IDOT requesting reimbursement, the City shall provide a copy of the IDOT invoice to Kendall County within five (5) calendar days of receipt thereof. Upon receipt of the MOT invoice, Kendall County agrees to disburse all, or a portion of the $500,000.00 loan, in an amount equal to the requested IDOT reimbursement amount (hereinafter referred to as "the Loan Proceeds"). Kendall County shall disburse the Loan Proceeds to the City within ten(10) business days after receipt of the invoice from the City. In the event that IDOT's requested reimbursement amount exceeds the remaining balance of the $500,000.00 loan, the City understands and agrees that it shall be solely responsible for reimbursing IDOT for any remaining balance not covered under the$500,000.00 loan. Section 5. If IDOT fails to advance funds due on the Project, the City understands and agrees that it is still obligated to honor its obligations under this Agreement and the City remains responsible for repayment of any funds due to Kendall County. Section 6. In consideration of the mutual promises and the terms and conditions set forth herein, Kendall County agrees to loan the amounts stated herein in exchange for the City's obligation to repay those amounts in accordance with the following payment schedule: On or 5 before September 1, 2013, Kendall County shall provide the City with an invoice for the total amount of money loaned by Kendall County to the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "the Loan Balance"). Upon receipt of the invoice, the City shall make payments to Kendall County for the Loan Balance in six (6) equal annual installments with the first payment commencing on October 31, 2013, and continuing each year thereafter until the Loan Balance has been repaid to Kendall County in full. Therefore, the payment schedule shall be paid as follows: 1) October 31, 2013 —First payment of 1/6`h of Loan Proceeds 2) October 31, 2014—Second payment of 1/6t'of Loan Proceeds 3) October 31, 2015 —Third payment of 1/6t'of Loan Proceeds 4) October 31, 2016—Fourth payment of 1/6t'of Loan Proceeds 5) October 31, 2017—Fifth payment of 1/6t'of Loan Proceeds 6) October 31, 2018—Sixth and final payment. of 1/6h of Loan Proceeds The parties understand and agree that Kendall County shall not be obligated to disburse any additional funds after issuance of the Loan Balance invoice without the prior written consent of all parties. Section 7. The failure of the City to perform, keep or observe any of the covenants, conditions, promises, agreements or obligations with respect to this Agreement, shall constitute a Default by the City hereunder. Further, in the event the City shall fail to timely make a scheduled payment, which the City is required to perform under this Agreement, Kendall County shall notify the City in writing and allow the City thirty(30) days from the date of receipt of the notice to cure the default. If the default is not cured within 30 days of receipt of such notice, Kendall County will consider the City to be in Default under this Agreement. Upon the occurrence of a 6 Default, Kendall County may by any action or proceeding at law or in equity, pursue and secure any available remedy, including but not limited to the specific performance of the agreement contained herein. The City further agrees to reimburse Kendall County for all attorneys' fees and costs incurred by Kendall County related to Kendall County's enforcement of this Agreement. Section 8. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder may not be assigned (except by operation of law), and the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Nothing in this Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any party, other than the parties and their respective successors and assigns, any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of such agreements. Section 9. All notices required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and may be given by either (a) depositing the same in the United States mail, addressed to the party to be notified, postage prepaid and certified with the return receipt requested, (b) delivering the same in person, or(c)telecopying the same with electronic confirmation of receipt. If to the County: County Administrator County of Kendall 111 West Fox Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 If to the Village: City Administrator United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Or such address or counsel as any party hereto shall specify in writing pursuant to this Section from time to time. 7 Section 10. This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced under the laws of the State of Illinois. Any legal proceeding related to enforcement of this Agreement shall be brought in the Circuit Court of Kendall County, Illinois. In case any provision of this Agreement shall be declared and/or found invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall, to the extent possible, be modified by the court in such manner as to be valid, legal and enforceable so as to most nearly retain the intent of the parties, and, if such modification is not possible, such provision shall be severed from this Agreement, and in either case the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. Section 11. The City and Kendall County agree that the waiver of, or failure to enforce, any breach of this Agreement by the remaining party shall not be construed, or otherwise operate, as a waiver of any future breach of this Agreement. Further, the failure to enforce any particular breach shall not bar or prevent the remaining party from enforcing this Agreement with respect to a different breach. No endorsement or statement on any check or correspondence accompanying a check for payment of an installment shall be deemed as an accord and satisfaction and Kendall County may accept such payment without prejudice to its rights to recover the balance of Loan Proceeds still owed. Section 12. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts (including facsimile signatures), each of which shall be deemed to be an original and both of which shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Section 13. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties and there are no other promises or conditions in any other agreement whether oral or written except for the terms and conditions set forth in the First Agreement. The parties acknowledge and agree 8 that the First Agreement remains valid and binding, with the exception of Section 4 of the First Agreement, which is hereby modified and replaced with Section 3(A) of this Agreement. Except as stated herein, this agreement supersedes any other prior written or oral agreements between the parties and may not be further modified except in writing acknowledged by both parties. Section 14. Nothing contained in this Agreement, nor any act of Kendall County or the City pursuant to this Agreement, shall be deemed or construed by any of the parties hereto or by third persons, to create any relationship of third party beneficiary, principal, agent, limited or general partnership,joint venture, or any association or relationship involving the County and the City. Section 15. The City shall defend, with counsel of Kendall County's own choosing, indemnify and hold harmless the County, including the County's past, present and future board members, elected officials, insurers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, obligations, losses, penalties, fines, damages, and expenses and costs relating thereto, including but not limited to attorneys' fees and other legal expenses, which the County, its past, present and future board members, elected officials, insurers, employees, and/or agents may hereafter sustain, incur or be required to pay relating to or arising in any manner out of the work to be performed by the City, the City's employees and agents, the City's contractors, and the City's sub-contractors retained to perform work on the Project, or arising in any manner out of the City's performance or alleged failure to perform its obligations pursuant to this Agreement. Section 16 Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing sixty (60) calendar days' advance written notice to the other party. Upon notice of termination of the Agreement, Kendall County shall provide the City with an invoice for the total Loan Balance. 9 Within sixty (60) calendar days after receipt of the invoice, the City shall pay the total Loan Balance to Kendall County. Section 17. Kendall County and the City each hereby warrant and represent that their respective signatures set forth below have been, and are on the date of this Agreement, duly authorized by all necessary and appropriate corporate and/or governmental action to execute this Agreement. Section 18. The Term of the Agreement shall commence as of the Agreement Date and shall expire upon final repayment of the Loan Proceeds except as otherwise specified herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Intergovernmental Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. County of Kendall, a unit of local government United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, of the State of Illinois Illinois a municipal corporation By: Chair, Kendall County Board yor A est: Attest: _ dd ounty Clerk City Clerk 10 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number •s► Legal ❑❑ Plan Commission#1 Finance EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ® Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ PC 2012-02 Police Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: D Construction Spoil/Fill Site (Evergreen Farms Estates) Special Use Request Meeting and Date: City Council —April 24, 2012 Synopsis: Request for Special Use in the R-2 Zoning District for grading and filling of the Evergreen Farm Estates site with clean soil from IDOT's Rte. 47 construction project. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 4-11-12 Action Taken: Plan Commission Findings of Fact Item Number: PC 2012-02 Type of Vote Required: Super Majority(2/3rds) Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum. sir Memorandum 0 a' To: City Council EST. ! W- 1836 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director -�� CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: April 17, 2012 tea= 9 ,= Subject: PC 2012-02—D Construction Spoil/Fill Site (Evergreen Farms Estates) Kendae counTy Lj<kE �. Special Use Request to the R-2 Zoning District Petitioner's Request& Background: D Construction Management, LLC, on behalf of Brandon Road Properties, LLC, owner, is requesting special use approval within the R-2 One Family Residence District to temporarily fill low areas and grade portions of the Evergreen Farms Estates with uncontaminated soil from the Illinois Department of Transportation's (IDOT) Route 47 roadway project. Upon completion of the roadway project, the property will be restored to its current agricultural land use until such time it is redeveloped for residential dwellings as previously approved in the annexation agreement and Preliminary Plan for Evergreen Farm Estates in 2006. The City's zoning ordinance specifically identifies "filling of holes, pits or lowlands with noncombustible material free from refuse and food wastes" as an allowable use only in the R-1 One- Family Residence District by special use permit. However, due to the cumulative nature of the zoning ordinance, all permitted and special uses allowed in the R-1 District are also allowed as permitted and special uses in the R-2 One Family Residence District. The proposed temporary fill and grading activity is also permitted on the property in the annexation agreement, but only when in conjunction with the redevelopment of the site for the approved residential land use. Plan Commission Action: The Plan Commission reviewed the requested special use permit at a public hearing held on March 14, 2012 and made the following action: Motion to recommend approval of the request for authorization within the R-2 One Family Residence District to temporarily fill low areas and grade portions of the Evergreen Farm Estates with uncontaminated soil from roadway projects of the State of Illinois and return to agricultural uses as allowed by Special Use Permit in Section 10-6C-2 and Section 10-613-2 of the United City of Yorkville City Code subject to recommendations in a staff memorandum dated March 7, 2012 and further subject to the clean soil only coming from the Route 47 roadway project. Action Item• Lindblom-nay; Crouch-nay; Weaver-nay; Prochaska-nay; Kraupner-nay 0 ayes; 5 nays; 0 abstentions Consequently, the Economic Development Committee (EDC), at its April 3, 2012 meeting, remanded the special use request to the Plan Commission due to a procedural technicality with the direction to fully enumerate and reduce each of the required Special Use standards to writing based solely upon the evidence presented by the Petitioner and from testimony given at the March 14'h public hearing, as required by State Statute. Plan Commission Written Findings of Facts: The findings of the Plan Commission with regard to the requested special use permit are contained within the minutes of the April 11, 2012 meeting based upon the standards in Section 10- 14-6F of the City's Zoning Ordinance, and are summarized as follows: 1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. Finding: Based upon the testimony provided in a Public Hearing on March 14, 2012 by those citizen's present, including a presentation by Gary Davidson, attorney, for the petitioner D. Construction Management behalf of Brandon Road Properties, LLC, owner, and a plan prepared by HR Green dated 3107112 titled "Evergreen Farm - Special Use Request", we, the Yorkville Plan Commission find that the Petitioner's request did not meet the standard due to the lack of adequate information regarding site grading, drainage, and proposed truck traffic which as a result of the proposed special use. 2. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. Finding: Based upon the testimony provided in a Public Hearing on March 14, 2012 by those citizen's present, including a presentation by Gary Davidson, attorney, for the petitioner D. Construction Management behalf of Brandon Road Properties, LLC, owner, and a plan prepared by HR Green dated 3107112 titled "Evergreen Farm - Special Use Request", we, the Yorkville Plan Commission find that the Petitioner's request did not meet the standard due to the lack of adequate information regarding site grading, drainage, and proposed truck traffic which may negatively impact other neighboring properties as a result of the proposed special use. 3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Finding: Based upon the testimony provided in a Public Hearing on March 14, 2012 by those citizen's present, including a presentation by Gary Davidson, attorney, for the petitioner D. Construction Management behalf of Brandon Road Properties, LLC, owner, and a plan prepared by HR Green dated 3107112 titled `Evergreen Farm - Special Use Request", we, the Yorkville Plan Commission find that the proposed special use will not interfere or impede the normal an orderly development and improvement of the surrounding permitted residential and agricultural land uses. 4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. Finding: Based upon the testimony provided in a Public Hearing on March 14, 2012 by those citizen's present, including a presentation by Gary Davidson, attorney, for the petitioner D. Construction Management behalf of Brandon Road Properties, LLC, owner, and a plan prepared by HR Green dated 3107112 titled "Evergreen Farm - Special Use Request", we, the Yorkville Plan Commission find that the Petitioner's request did not meet the standard due to the lack of adequate information specifically related to drainage being provided on the property as a result of the proposed special use. 5. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. Finding: Based upon the testimony provided in a Public Hearing on March 14, 2012 by those citizen's present, including a presentation by Gary Davidson, attorney, for the petitioner D. Construction Management behalf of Brandon Road Properties, LLC, owner, and a plan prepared by HR Green dated 3107112 titled "Evergreen Farm - Special Use Request" we, the Yorkville Plan Commission find that although adequate ingress and egress to the site has been provided via the proposed two (2) construction entrances, traffic congestions along Fox Road, a public street, may be increased due to the additional truck traffic and construction activity as a result of the proposed special use and therefore does not meet the standard. 6. The special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the City Council pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan Commission. Finding: Based upon the testimony provided in a Public Hearing on March 14, 2012 by those citizen's present, including a presentation by Gary Davidson, attorney, for the petitioner D. Construction Management behalf of Brandon Road Properties, LLC, owner, and a plan prepared by HR Green dated 3107112 titled "Evergreen Farm - Special Use Request", we, the Yorkville Plan Commission find that the proposed special use could in all other respects conform to the R-2 One Family Residence District zoning regulations in which it is located except in those instances where modifications by the City Council may be made pursuant to the recommended conditions of the Plan Commission. Subsequent Information by Petitioner: During the April 11"' Plan Commission meeting, the Petitioner had sought to submit into the record additional information regarding their special use request obtained from the City via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) filing. The additional information the Petitioner referenced was a regional stormwater drainage study prepared by EEI in February 2007 for the southwest development area of the city entitled `Hydrologic & Hydraulic Analysis for: Southwest Stormwater Study (Fox Road Area)" and the "Fox Road Southwest Area Transportation Study" prepared by EEI in November 2005. Both studies covered an approximately 5-6 square mile area, and consisted of several proposed development projects including the Evergreen Farm Estates property. Of particular note is that both reports are based upon the assumption that the Evergreen Farm Estates property has been constructed as a single family residential development per the approved PUD concept plan, and not as proposed by the Petitioner in their special use request. The Petitioner's request to submit these documents for consideration by the Plan Commission was denied at the April 1It' meeting, since the public hearing on the matter had been closed by the Plan Commission and a vote already taken. Any new evidence or testimony presented for consideration must be done during a public hearing to allow for cross examination and comment by the public. A copy of both reports has been attached, along with the Petitioner's FOIA requests, for your reference. City Council Action: The following options are available for the City Council to consider with regard to the requested special use permit in the R-2 One Family Residence District for temporary fill of clean soil from the Route 47 roadway construction project on the Evergreen Farm Estates property: 1. Direct the City Attorney to draft an ordinance denying the Special Use request. 2. Direct the City Attorney to draft an ordinance approving the Special Use request as presented. 3. Direct the City Attorney to draft an ordinance approving the Special Use request with staff's recommended conditions provided below: a. The two (2) proposed temporary entrances off of Fox Road shall align and be subject to Kendall County Highway permit approval. b. In 2009, the City completely resurfaced the stretch of Fox Road from Route 47 west to Popular Drive (approx. 5,500 linear feet) as part of the State's Local Agency Pavement Preservation(LAPP) program. Due to this recent improvement of our City's road infrastructure and the potential damage of Fox Road as a direct result from the proposed operation, a cash deposit or bond shall be required by the petitioner as security to be held by the City until the completion of the proposed temporary use. The fee shall be determined by the City's engineering consultant and based upon the review of the Site Development & Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans. c. The special use approval shall be subject to Site Development Plan & Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan approval. d. The clean soil deposited on the property shall be limited to the Illinois Department of Transportation Route 47 roadway project. 4. Send the matter back to the Plan Commission to conduct a new public hearing to consider the subsequent information by the Petitioner. Since the Plan Commission unanimously recommended denial of the Petitioner's request, the City Council will need a concurring vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the elected members should they decide to approve the special use and reverse the recommendation of the Plan Commission. For your reference, staff has attached a copy of the memorandums submitted to the Plan Commission regarding this request, as well as the minutes and transcripts from those meetings. The petitioner will be present at Tuesday night's meeting to address the City Council. Memorandum a 1 % To: Plan Commission EST. _ leas From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator r= ` �y Date: April 3, 2012 Subject: PC 2012-02 - D Construction Spoil/Fill Site (Evergreen Farms Estate) Special Use Request to the R-2 Zoning District As you will recall, the Plan Commission reviewed the requested special use permit for the Evergreen Farm Estates property at a public hearing held on March 14, 2012 and took the following action: Motion to recommend approval of the request for authorization within the R-2 One Family Residence District to temporarily fill low areas and grade portions of the Evergreen Farm Estates with uncontaminated soil from roadway projects of the State of Illinois and return to agricultural uses as allowed by Special Use Permit in Section 10-6C-2 and Section 10-6B-2 of the United City of Yorkville City Code subject to recommendations in a staff memorandum dated March 7, 2012 and further subject to the clean soil only coming from the Route 47 roadway project. Action Item Vote: Lindblom-nay; Crouch-nay; Weaver-nay; Prochaska-nay; Kraupner-nay 0 ayes; 5 nays; 0 abstentions Staff Comments & Recommendation: As indicated is the above vote, the Plan Commission unanimously recommended denial of the requested special use permit in the R-2 One Family Residence District for temporary fill of clean soil from the Route 47 roadway construction project onto the Evergreen Farm Estates property. However, during the Plan Commission's deliberation of the evidence presented by the Petitioner and from testimony of those present at the public hearing, there was a failure to enumerate and reduce each of the required Special Use standards to writing. Due to the fact that Illinois State Statute requires in cases of special uses that the findings of fact shall refer to any exhibits containing plans and specifications, and shall specify the reason(s) for making a recommendation of approval or denial (65 ILCS 5111-13-I1), at staff's recommendation, the Economic Development Committee (EDQ has remanded the special use request to the Plan Commission for further deliberation and a full vetting of the individual Standards for Special Use based solely upon the evidence and testimony presented at the public hearing on March 14, 2012 to render written findings of facts to be considered by the City Council for final determination. For your reference, staff's memorandum and supporting materials submitted for review at the March 14'h public hearing meeting are attached and the Standards for Special Use are provided below. Standards for Special Use: Section 10-14-6F of the City's Zoning Ordinance establishes standards for special use requests. No special use shall be recommended by the Plan Commission unless said commission shall find that: 1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. 2. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. 3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. 4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. 5. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. 6. The special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the City Council pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan Commission. Attachments: 1. Staff's memorandum to Plan Commission dated March 7, 2012. 2. Aerial and Photographs of Subject Property 3. Copy of Petitioner's Application w/attachments. 4. Evergreen Farm Special Use Request Preliminary Site Plan prepared by HR Green dated 3/07/12. 5. Response to Staff's site plan review comments prepared by David Shultz of HR Green dated March 7, 2012. 6. Response to Engineering Enterprises Inc. (EEI) site plan review comments prepared by David Shultz of HR Green dated March 7, 2012. 7. Copy of Public Notice. Memorandum a 1 To: Plan Commission EST. -,� _ 1836 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: March 7, 2012 Subject: PC 2012-02 - D Construction Spoil/Fill Site (Evergreen Farms Estate) Special Use Request to the R-2 Zoning District Petitioner's Request: D Construction Management, LLC, on behalf of Brandon Road Properties, LLC, owner, is requesting special use approval within the R-2 One Family Residence District to temporarily fill low areas and grade portions of the Evergreen Farms Estates with uncontaminated soil from the Illinois Department of Transportation's (IDOT) Route 47 roadway project. Upon completion of the roadway project, the property will be restored to its current agricultural land use until such time it is redeveloped for residential dwellings. The City's zoning ordinance specifically identifies "filling of holes,pits or lowlands with noncombustible material free from refuse and food wastes" as an allowable use only in the R-1 One-Family Residence District by special use permit. However, due to the cumulative nature of the zoning ordinance, all permitted and special uses allowed in the R-1 District are also allowed as permitted and special uses in the R-2 One Family Residence District. Property Background: The Evergreen Farms Estates property, located at northeast and southeast corners of Fox Road and Pavilion Road, consists of two (2) parcels approximately 46.5-acres in total area. The parcel north of Fox Road is approximately 20.5 acres and the parcel south of Fox Road is approximately 26 acres. In 2006, the parcels were annexed into the City and approved a concept plan for a 77-unit single family residential development as part of an annexation agreement between the City and the original owners/developer of the property, Evergreen Farms Estates, LLC (Tanglewood Development Corporation). The annexation agreement did have provisions allowing the owner, following Preliminary Plan approval, to undertake excavation, preliminary grading work, filing and soil stockpiling on the property in preparation for the development of the site upon submittal of a grading plan and soil erosion and sedimentation control plan to the City and approved by the City Engineer. However, Preliminary Plan approval has not been granted for the Evergreen Farms Estate development and the proposed filing and soil stockpiling on the property is not in preparation for the development of the property for a residential land use. The annexation agreement also permits for the continuation of the property currently being used for farming and general agricultural uses until such time it is developed. Since approval of the concept plan in 2006 for the Evergreen Farms Estate property, no further action for redevelopment occurred. The property was placed on the market for sale and was recently purchased by the petitioner, Brandon Road Properties, LLC. Proposal Summary & Staff Comments: Below is staff's commentary regarding the petitioner's proposal for the temporary clean spoil/fill site operation. A more detailed project narrative, proposed site plan and responses to staff's initial plan review comments prepared by the petitioner is also included in the packet for your review. Day-to-Day Operations: As proposed, the temporary soil/fill operation on the property will coincide with the Route 47 project timeline and last for about 1-2 years. Trucks will remove clean spoil from the roadway construction site and haul the load to the subject property for re-spread to fill and grade low areas and to stockpile soil for later use. The operating hours for the project site will occur during normal business hours and comply with Section 4-4-3: Noise Ordinance of the City's Code which restricts excessive noise near residential land during daytime (7:OOAM — 10:00 PM) and overnight (10:00PM — 7:OOAM) hours. According to the petitioner, a majority of the grading operation will occur on only one (1) parcel, either north of Fox Road or south of Fox Road, at any given time during the operation. There are no temporary or permanent structures proposed as part of the special use permit application. Site Access & Traffic: The petitioner states the number of truckloads per day will vary with some days having little to no truck traffic, but estimates a peak of approximately 20-25 truckloads per day. The trucks, which will not exceed the legal or posted weight limits, will access the property from two (2) proposed temporary access points off of Fox Road as illustrated on the attached site plan. Permitting for these entrances will require authorization from the Kendall County Department of Highways, as this portion of Fox Road is under the county's jurisdiction. No construction traffic, nor truck access to the south parcel,will occur off of Pavilion Road. Appropriate traffic signage alerting motorists that trucks are entering and exiting the property onto Fox Road is also proposed. The on-site contractor will monitor Fox Road for construction traffic debris and/or dirt, and will conduct daily street cleaning as required during the temporary operation. A Street Cleaning deposit will be required by the City of Yorkville in the amount of $5,000.00 as part of the Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan approval and grading permit issuance. Site Development& Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans: Site Development & Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans are required by the city to permit the proposed grading and fill operation. These plans will indicate where sediment traps and perimeter silt fencing will be located on the site to protect existing drainage patterns, detail the method of dust control and street cleaning, and prevent erosion and runoff of the soil stock piles. These final engineering plans will be submitted by the petitioner and reviewed by the City's engineering consultant upon approval of the Special Use request. Compliance with Illinois Environmental Protection Agency(IEPA) regulations: The Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) will have the responsibility of completing the necessary environmental assessments and analysis to certify which soils from the Route 47 reconstruction project are non-special waste requiring transportation and disposal to a landfill and which soils are certified as "uncontaminated" soils per the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) standards. The Evergreen Farms Estates site will only receive the certified"uncontaminated" or clean soil. The testing of the soils will be conducted by an environmental engineering firm, ENMARC & Associates, contracted by IDOT. In a correspondence from ENMARC & Associates dated January 25, 2012 (attached), the project's environmental engineer states that the certified"clean" soil from the Route 47 project will not only meet the current IEPA standards for soil suitable for residential properties, but will also meet new regulations which provide additional criteria to further assess the soil's quality. Staff Comments & Recommendations: Staff offers the following comments and recommendations for the Plan Commission to consider when reviewing the petitioner's request: • Staff recommends the two (2) proposed temporary entrances off of Fox Road align and has shared this concern with the Kendall County Department of Highways in advance of issuance of the required access permit. The special use approval shall be subject to Kendall County Highway permit approval. • In 2009, the City completely resurfaced the stretch of Fox Road from Route 47 west to Popular Drive (approx. 5,500 linear feet) as part of the State's Local Agency Pavement Preservation (LAPP) program. Due to this recent improvement of our City's road infrastructure and the potential damage of Fox Road as a direct result from the proposed operation, Staff suggests an additional deposit or bonding be required by the petitioner as security to be held by the City until the completion of the proposed temporary use. The fee will be determined by the City's engineering consultant and based upon the review of the Site Development & Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plans. • The special use approval shall be subject to Site Development Plan & Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan approval. Standards for Special Use: Section 10-14-617 of the City's Zoning Ordinance establishes standards for special use requests. No special use shall be recommended by the Plan Commission unless said commission shall find that: 1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. 2. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. 3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. 4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. 5. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. 6. The special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the City Council pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan Commission. Attachments: 1. Aerial and Photographs of Subject Property 2. Copy of Petitioner's Application w/attachments. 3. Evergreen Farm Special Use Request Preliminary Site Plan prepared by HR Green dated 3/07/12. 4. Response to Staff's site plan review comments prepared by David Shultz of HR Green dated March 7, 2012. 5. Response to Engineering Enterprises Inc. (EEI) site plan review comments prepared by David Shultz of HR Green dated March 7, 2012. 6. Copy of Public Notice. ,x•: .� ,�" �Ph deay ,sa�' .� � d�a° ,� .� �" .� dla y dre .� ,��' .aa ..�: .c..,i yc.,��.,��. y°`�.,tia•Y. �.� �..,�a mac.,��.,,°``+i.,ia+j.,,ate.rc.,a-..s. ��.:' 's.,��.,,,�a�. i. �.,.: pry +�t-. a ow d 44 ��t-. V•. �d Py �4ti t-. d 9-. �c-. t-. d cY day r� a< '�'d.� w a-.r�P t-. n`P.� .a+a .aa d+a a0 F/4 � .Ya Pay .o+a .Pra .tra d/a .ora .an d� rYa .a4� •.Pa�,��d+a�.�.�.ao�Pb�.�a�.��.aay��.�",+�ara"�,��:�:~a�.�,�,� �l. ``ice-,�i."'�pyS`'��ai`u�Sy�l`"�pyi`'��'Y`��aS`py1`�,^�y.`m��"+1`'^py3."H`p'a:, ma's-.+S`ua'y.`..,c+e;r�d•rq�-ry Pa.�. •'�.' .,w"`L+�-."`a+.�."`.�,w..L+",^`°';",w'..+",..L�''."`a+Y.:�'w...L�+w"`a+�..". +.e..L�". a;"Y"`'„++wi ,•`�Y'..*��L.: •.rt: .� .a+.: d�A d+.;`+ .� P4 .a•+k`+' .may .ate .a+e:"" P4° .r.. .� .en: s- .ae dn. �.- ��rhd y..u�•i..�d'�1.rti rtd iS.m�rL�` _ ..�ewyu:.a`�;..YP`r`—rtP��d� 1yi`+h yi"Mai�i.��iyir•. Ate..+�w u_�++w - ayy _ ..a�•' ...,t ..i!'+.'..y.r+e."`y.'.+A"i+'w`�a w�,,.a.*'�:4 i.+w. ^�h"a..��."`y+Y.,.�+ihr wPay and ay .`•+P a-� w a. Pay .Pay !4p a.,. Pay ry,P�. � '�•�•d ay l+•P t-. .rPay a,+ti1� +��y+y` Y+y`��y`�Jr+tii r4+y1�..y,++A•.y+�'��*w+.y +a � .!a db o-.aay .aa � � .aa .ah a. ♦ � �+�y+��,+ehr .tiA�vy.�.ivy.;l��vy.��vt+ti�vt,^v.�vy.74�v..�v.�vti•�'a�.y,�� .� . +��v �v ��J.. - i,i'w'y t'+.'�y+r...a.iv " +m....a Nh�..a..r' � � �(�'J�/�- ti, �-•••.I.+r.. .,da: .a?i ,a1. ., rg -Pa yy dw r.Pa. � (U�yP' �-(� •°`°w WE �J.PYy ,d" rl The e - • '1 ♦ • • j o Data provided of United City of Yorkville GIS accuracy,timeliness,or completeness.It is the responsibility of Parcel D the 4�-11 ata and Aerial Photography . . . Provided By Kendall County GIS appropriateness of its use. The United City of Yorkville makes no --1 d or implied,to the use of Data. 4 � ter- �sf� -y M rj '-�a�"- �'^:^L�4 ..;� �, .�t,ray.•4.c3'. ` 'd" - < y �w i, it' ..•y,7 za 3 r :. Eli _ _ _ .wit •��,.. r7 n; 1 `�� "�`+�� •-;- '`,�,� . - l.t a;.� � sit _ f: nn, �p•,.� r I �R+.��' '�� 'yk �1.A. •�. •. � ��Y� ,tit. � .'-. - _ rw Via. ><•. _5RS'�Y�TI�e+3� '�'•~ ��'� +■ I0ifVlI.!-iW'30 IN3Wd013A311 k[INIIINWOD 43 �rr�O United City of Yorkville } 800 Game Farm Road Z��Z 'Z NVF t, EST `° -- HIM Yorkville, Illinois 60560 col 0 Telephone: 630-553-4350 L ,y�.2 Fax: 630-553-3436 PC# APPLICATION & PETITION ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST Development Name: Evergreen.Farm Date of Submission: 01/25/11 Requesting: d Annexation p Zoning d Planned Unit Development M Special Use: Filling and grading of site with approved clean fill -Return to Ag. Use 1. Name of Petitioner(s): Mr. Joe Phillips, D Construction Management- behalf of Owner Address: 1488 S. Broadway Coal City, Illinois 60416 Phone Number: . (815) 634-2555 Fax Number: _(815) 634-8748 Email Address: phi]lip sdevelopmentgroup@yahoo.com Relationship of Petitioner(s)to subject property: 0 Owner )0 Developer d Contract Purchaser 2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from#1: BRANDON ROAD PROPERTIES, LLC If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: 3. a). (i). Street address and physical location of subject property: NE & SE corners of Fox Road&Pavillion Road (ii). Zoning of surrounding parcels: North. Kendall Co. Forest Preserve—Tax Exempt South: Agriculture (Kendall County) East: Agriculture (Kendall County) West. Agriculture(R-2 Yorkville) b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit W. c). Total Acreage: +/-46.5 acres d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s)of property: 05-06-100-012 e). Current Zoning Classification: R-2 (Yorkville) f). Zoning Classification Requested: None-remain as existing zoning g). Is this property within City limits? X Yes No, requesting annexation United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 1.29.09 44 4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners and landowners within 500' entitled to notice of petition under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: Attach a separate list and label as Exhibit"B". 5. List all governmental entities or agencies required to receive notice under Illinois law: United City of Yorkville, Kendall County Highway Department, IDNR, IHPA 6. List the Illinois Business Tax Number(IBT#)for the State of Illinois and names of businesses located on subject property to be annexed: NIA 7. Does a flood plain exist on the subject property? Yes 8. Do Electors reside on the subject property? No If so, they must execute this petition to annex. (Electors as defined by Illinois Law is a resident of the parcel who is a registered voter. Legal owners of the annexing parcel must sign the petition regardless of place of residence or legal voting status.) 9. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: Attorney: Name: Gary K. Davidson-Brumund, Jacobs, Hammel, Davidson &Andreano, LLC Address: 58 E. Clinton Street, Suite 200 Joliet, Illinois 60432-4143 Phone Number: (815) 723-0628 Fax Number: (815) 723-1371 Email Address: gdavidson@brumund-jacobs.com Engineer: Name: HR Green, inc. _David Schultz Address. 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201 Yorkville,IL. 60560 Phone Number: 630.708.5002 Fax Number: 630.553.7646 Email Address: dschultz@hrgreen.com Land Planner: Name:HR Green, ine. - David Schultz Address: 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201 Yorkville, IL. 60560 Phone Number: 630.708.5002 Fax Number: 630.553.7646 Email Address: dschultz @hrgreen.com United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 1.29.09 45 10. Submit the following to the Community Development Department in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 35 copies. b. Appropriate filing fee(Please refer to page 4 of this application to"Petitioner Route, Step 1, Fees"and/or contact the Community Development Department for verification of this amount.) c. Concept or Preliminary Site Plan: 35 sets folded to fit in a 10"x 13"envelope. d. One CD containing one electronic copy(pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with exhibits) legal description, and site plan. In witness whereof the following petitioner(s)have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is contiguourAW"ev a United City of Yorkville. Date: 27-/► 2012- Petitioner"nature:nature: (All legal property owners' signatures must appear on this application.) �T Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of AnI . 200- /9 Notary Seal THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. LPublic L SEAL T HANSEN NotaSlate of Ipinols My Com pires Oct 05.2018 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 1.29.09 46 ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST PETITIONER ROUTE Step 1: Petitioner must submit a completed application,fees'and all pertinent materials to the Community Development Department a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. Petitioner is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,etc.,to allow timely review by City. 'Fees: a. Annexation or Annexation and Rezoning-$250 plus$10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres b. Rezoning only-$200 plus$10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres c. Special Use-$250 plus$10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres d. Engineering Review Fees- 1.25%of the approved engineer's estimate of cost of all land improvements, to be determined by City Engineer. e. Planned Unit Development fee-$500 f. Engineering Review Deposit-up to 1 acre=$1,000; over 1 acre but not over 10= $2,500 over 10 acres, but not over 40=$5,000 over 40 acres, but not over 100= $10,000 over 100 acres=$20,000 g. Deposit for Outside Consultants-under 2 acres=$1,000 2 to 10 acres= $2,500 over 10 acres= $5,000 Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). Should Owner/Developer not pay these fees directly, they will be responsible for reimbursing the United City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs. Note: You must present your plan at each of the meetings below as indicated. Step 2: Plan Council: The Plan Council meets the 2nd and 4'h Thursday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in the city conference Room. Upon recommendation by the Plan Council,you will move forward to the Plan Commission Meeting. Attendees to this meeting include: Community Development Director, City Engineer,Zoning Official, Public Works Director, Director of Parks and Recreation, Fire Department Representative, and Police Department representative. Step 3: Park Board planning meeting: The Park Board makes recommendations on any park sites included in residential developments. The Park Board planning meeting is the 4th Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Parks and Recreation Office at 201 W. Hydraulic Street. Step 4: Plan Commission: The Plan Commission meets the 2nd Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Yorkville public library at 902 Game Farm Road. The Plan Commission will make a recommendation for the City Council's consideration. The Plan Commission consists of 10 members appointed by the Mayor. A public hearing will be held at this time for the Annexation Agreement and/or Rezoning request or Special Use request. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record and certified mail by the petitioner to adjacent property owners within 500 ft.of the subject property no less than fifteen days and no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing date. A certified affidavit must be filed by the petitioner with the Community Development Department's office containing the names, addresses and permanent parcel numbers of all property owners. United City oFYorkville Annexation,PUD,"Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 1.29.09 47 Step 5-Economic Development Committee: The Economic Development Committee meets the 1st Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere where no formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings. Step 6: City Council:A public hearing is required for annexation or PUD agreements. The City Council meets the 2"or 4`h Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. A public hearing will be held at this time for the Annexation Agreement and/or Planned Unit Development Agreement. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record. A certified mailing to surrounding landowners is not required for this public hearing. Any annexation agreement, PUD agreement or development agreement must be signed by the Petitioner prior to being voted on by the City Council. Agreement: I understand and accept all requirements,fees as outlined as well as any incurred Administrative and Planning Consultant Fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return this original (retaining a copy for your records)to the Community Development Department, United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorl i 60560. Date: a1., � ignature of Petitioner United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 1.29.09 EXHIBIT A Legal Description —"Evergreen Farm" Parcel THAT PART OF SECTION 6,TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINICIPAL MERIDAN DESCRIBED BY COMMENCING ATHE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 6;THENCE WEST 233.9 EET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, &QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY;THENCE SOUTH 61° 06' 20" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 1488.52 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE SOUTH 01° 28, 38" EAST 406.94 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 25° 19' 10" EAST 1326.82 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 240 05' 33" EAST 587.67 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 66°45'42" WEST 1560.96 FEETTO THE CENTER LINE OF A GRAVEL ROAD; THENCE NORTH 22° 15'40" WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1258.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 06° 13' 10" WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID GRAVEL ROAD 250.27 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF FOX ROAD;THENCE SOUTH 63'42' 50" WESTALONG THE CENTER LINE OF FOX ROAD 43.37 FEET;THENCE NORTH 080 38' 52"WEST 676.69 FEETTO THE AFORESAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE;THENCE NORTH 61'06' 20" EASTALONG SAID RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE 1431.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN KENDALL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY 350.0 FEET OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY 469.81 FEETTHEREOF AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING PARCEL OF PROPERTY FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING AFORESAID;THENCE SOUTH 01° 28' 38" EAST 406.94 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 25° 19' 10" EAST 305.69 FEETTO THE CENTER LINE OF FOX ROAD FOR A NEW POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE SOUTH 25° 19' 10" EAST 1021.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 240 50' 33" EAST 587.67 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 66° 45,42" WEST 625.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 250 19' 10" WEST 1540.44 FEET TO SAID CENTER LINE OF FOX ROAD;THENCE NORTH 63'42' 50" EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 630.0 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN KENDALL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. EXHIBIT B "EVERGREEN FARM" PARCEL ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS (WITHIN 500 FEET) 05-06-100-001 05-06-302-001 05-06-126-003 Wayne & Ruby Bomeman Gerard &Paula Louise Dervin G. Linda J. Allen 12103 Fox Road Gawlik 12 Fox Glen Circle Yorkville, Illinois 60560 6650 Pavilion Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 05-06-100-010 05-06-126-004 Kendall County Forest 05-06-302-002 Pamela J. Robinson & Preserve John T. & B.R. Cutsinger Sharon M. Rose 110 West Madison 6672 Pavilion Road 29 Fox Glen Drive, East Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 05-06-100-1008 05-06-302-005 05-06-127-001 Silver Fox Real Estate LLC Ronald & Rebecca Kleckner Jeffrey S. & Debra L. Ness 7512 County Line Road 6720 Pavilion Road 42 Fox Glen Drive, West Burr Ridge, Illinois 60521 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 05-06-100-013 05-06-302-006 05-06-127-002 Stephen G. & Kathleen Theis Dahl Management LLC Ramon &Noemi Herrera 11642 Fox Road 15010 159" Street, West 36 Fox Glenn Drive, West Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Homer Glen, Illinois 60491 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 05-06-100-009 05-06-302-008 05-06-501-001 James Miller/Susan Wilhelm Ali N. & Frances L. G. JCB & Q RR CO 11500 Fox Road Jablway 547 West Jackson Yorkville, Illinois 60560 6624 Pavilion Road Chicago, Illinois 60606 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 05-06-101-001 04-01-501-001 Daniel F. &Patricia L. Kalas 05-08-376-008 CB & RR CO 45 Fox Glen Drive, West Wayne J. &C. Kathleen Walz 547 West Jackson Yorkville, Illinois 60560 23925 Cedar Road, South Chicago, Illinois 60606 Manhattan, Illinois 60442 05-06-101-002 04-01-200-002 Derek West/Margo Robles 05-06-126-001 Wayne L. & Ruby Bomeman 51 Fox Glen Drive Gregory R. &Juile R. Fisher 12103 Fox Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 2001 Walton Court Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Naperville, Illinois 60565 05-06-301-001 04-01-200-003 Aspen Ridge Estates LLC 05-06-126-002 Fox River Bluff LLC 9217 Gulfstream Road, Peter J. Kathleen M. P.O. Box 1746 Suite`102 Staunton Lombard, Illinois 60148 Frankfort, Illinois 60423 15 Fox Glen Circle Yorkville, Illinois 60560 04-01426-001 Aspen Ridge Estates LLC 9217 Gulfstream Road, Suite102 Frankfort, Illinois 60423 �0-D CITf, United City of Yorkville 0 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville,Illinois 60560 esr �•o less Telephone: 630-5534350 Fax: 630-553-7575 � �'� ?� INVOICE& WORKSHEET � t PETITION APPLICATION CONTACT: DEVELOPMENT/PROPERTY: Mr,doe Phitlips, D Construction Fyergreen Farm Estate.- 1488 S.Broadway,Coal City,Illinois 60416 Acreage:approx.47 acres (815)634-2555 Date: 01/25/11 Concept Plan Review: I J Yes [I No S Engineering Plan Review Deposit of$$500 due Amendment: I]Yes I I No $ $500.00 Fee due fur each. (Annexation) (Plan) (Plat) (PUD) Annexation: [I Yes []No $ $250.00,plus$10/acre for each acre over 5. #of acres: -5= x$10" +5250 Rezoning: I I Yes []No S 5200.00,plus$10/acre for each acre over 5, #of acres: -5= x 510= +S200 If annexing and rezoning,charge only 1 per acre fee. If rezoning to a PUD,charge PUD Development Fee-not Rezoning Fee. Special Use. [XJ Yes []No $670.00 5250.00,plus$10/acre for each acre over 5. 4 of acres: 47.0-5=42.0 x$10=420.00+$250 Zoning Variance: $85.00 I]Yes []No $ Outside Consultants deposit of 5500.00 due Preliminary Plan Fee: $500.00 []Yes I]No $ P.U.D.Fee: $500.00 []Yes [J No $ Final Plat Fee: $500.00 [J Yes []No S Engineering Plan Review Deposit: [X]Yes []No $10.000.00 _ []Less than 1 acre=S 1,000 due []Over 1 acre and less than 10 acres=52,500 due []Over 10 acres and less than 40 acres=$5,000 due [XJ Over 40 acres and less than 100 acres=$10,000 due I J Over 100 acres=520,000 due Outside Consultants Deposit,: [XJ Yes [I No $5.000.00 Legal,Land Planner,Zoning Coordinator,Environmental Services Annexation Suhdivision Rezonine,and Special Use_ []Less than 2 acres=S 1,000 due [J Over 2 acres and less than 10 acres=52,500 due [X]Over 10 acres=55,000 due TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $15.670.00 Woo&0 Dme'Dev.Drp.AR01 Fee Sheri Wkse ENKI"I'AC 224 E.Cusler 5i., Lemont, 1L 60439 :�i PO BOX 866,Morris, It 60450 %.issaciates, LLC Phone 630.257.4357•Fax 630.257.1650 January 25, 2012 Mr. David Schultz HRE Green, Inc. 651 Prairie Point Drive,Suite 201 Yorkville, IL 60650 RE: Evergreen Farm Special Use Project Dear Mr.Schultz: Pursuant to your request, ENMARC & Associates, LLC is herein providing information regarding the management of the clean fill in accordance with the above referenced special use application. Prior to completion of any reconstruction of any ROW owned by the State, the Illinois Department of Transportation contracts the completion of a Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment (PESA) of the entire roadway to be subject to reconstruction and identifies any Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC's) on properties adjacent to said ROW. Based upon the results of the PESA, IDOT subsequently completes a PSI (Preliminary Site Investigation) which consists of the actual quantification of the REC's through sampling and analysis of the ROW in areas where excavation is to occur. Subsequently, ]DOT then defines boundaries of impacted zones in which the soils generated from reconstruction activities are quantified as non-special waste requiring transportation and disposal at a Subtitle D Landfill. With the regards to the soils outside of the delineated impact zones, these materials are typically certified by IDOT as "uncontaminated" soil pursuant to the new CCDD requirements (PA 96-1416, as amended by PA 97-137), and subject the agreement established between the Illinois EPA and IDOT. Per this agreement, the IEPA recognizes this methodology of "uncontaminated" soil determination established by IDOT for highway projects,to be acceptable for purposes of establishing soils as "clean". Presently, uncontaminated soils are established by IDOT as those meeting the requirements of 35 IAC Part 742 (Tier Approach for Corrective Action Cleanup objectives, TACO) for residential properties, or those meeting the background standards established for major metropolitan statistical areas (which includes Kendall County). Under PA 1416, the IEPA has developed new regulations that are presently under review by the Illinois Pollution Control Board and proposed for adoption by July 31, 2012. Under the proposed regulations, the IEPA has established clean soil standards, which basically follow TACO and which IDOT has been considering (since the development of the proposed regulations) to further assess and delineate between"uncontaminated"soils and"contaminated"soil zones under their PSI protocol. On behalf of D Construction, 1 will be your point of contact with respect to any environmental issues or concerns. Should you have any further questions regarding the enclosed, please do_ not hesitate to contact me @ 630-234-3495. Sincerely, / t / e g anetteVir il]o Environmental Engineer EVERGREEN FARM SPECIAL USE REQUEST UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE HOOVER - FOREST R-2 ZONING PRESERVE (A-1-SU ZONING) CHICAGO BURLINGTON NORTHERN E QUINCY R•R 1432.31' i EXISTING PROPERTY EXISTING TREE DRIPUNE LINE (TYP.) (TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED) AREA NORTH OF FOX RD. 20.5 AC. KENDALL COUNTY (R-2 ZONING - CITY) (A-I ZONING) EXISTING USE - AGRICULTURE ^/O' FUTURE USE - AGRICULTURE TOPSOIL STRIP BERM �O AFTER CLEAN FILL AND STOCKPILE AREA n EXISTING TREE DRIPUNE GRADING OPERATIONS (DETERMINE AT FINAL �( (TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED) ENGINEERING) O V� EXISTING CULVERT AND FIELD ENTRANCE (VERIFY WITH EXISTING TREE ORIPLINE O COUNTY AND IMPROVE FIELD (TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED) v- EXISTING R.O.W. ENTRANCE AS REQUIRED PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION M (TYP.) ENTRANCE FOR ACCESS EL C EXISTING CULVERT (TEMPORARY) TO NORTH PARCEL OVERHEAD TO REMAIN UTILITY LINES (TYP.) (FOX ROAD)[EXISTING IXI5nNG DRNEWAY --—OE - -- I - ---- CULVERT(TO REMAIN) / 4' FOX ROAD 630.00' EVERGREEN FARM KENDALL COUNTY ° (A-1 ZONING) EXISTING CULVERT AND FIELD ASPEN RIDGE ry ENTRANCE (VERIFY WITH LOCATION MAP (2-2 ZONING - CITY)ry o COUNTY AND IMPROVE FIELD ENTRANCE AS REQUIRED PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FOR ACCESS EXISTING R.O.W. TO SOUTH PARCEL Now7N (TYP.) (TEMPORARY) - SOUTHWEST 0 Q� SIDE/CORRIDOR HE CITY OF EXISTING OVERHEAD �.-�a UTILITY UNES (NP.) , Z R0P _O .Fox -- -� PROJECT Oz AREA �a PROJECT CONTACTS AREA SOUTH OF FOX RD, Y —EXISTING UON ROD) (R-2 ZONING 26.0 AC. CITY) CLIENT: GOVERNMENT CONTACT: - (PAVIWON ROAD) EXISTING USE - AGRICULTURE JOE PHILLIPS - D CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT FUTURE USE - AGRICULTURE 1488 S. BROADWAY CITY CONTACT: AFTER CLEAN FILL AND COAL CITY, ILLINOIS 60416 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 800 GAME FARM ROAD GRADING OPERATIONS TEL: (815) 634-2555, FAX: (815) 634-8748 YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 TEL: (630) 553-4350 Ol ^1 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR: CITY ENGINEERING CONTACT: w 14 HR GREEN, INC. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. h 651 PRAIRIE POINTE DR., SUITE 201 BRAD SANDERSON, P.E. YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 52 WHEELER ROAD TEL: (630) 553-7560 SUGAR GROVE, ILLINOIS 60554 FAX: (630) 553-7646 TEL: (630) 466-6700 DAVID W. SCHULTZ, P.E. - PROJECT MANAGER KENDALL COUNiY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT TEL: (630) 708-5002 COUNTY ENGINEER FRANCIS P.E. PETER J. HUINKER, P.E. - SITE MANAGER 6780 ROUTE TE S4, EXISTING PROPERTY TEL: (630) 708=5003 OFFICE: 630-5537616 UNE (TYP.) FAX: 630-553-75 GENERAL NOTES: C E R T I F I C A T I O N • NPDES PERMIT REQUIRED. • SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO BE FILED AT FINAL ENGINEERING. EXISTING PROPERTY KENDALL COUP COUNTY PO crrY. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S SIGNATURE & SEAL LINE (TYP.) SEDIMENT TRAPS AND PERIMETER FENCING TO PROTECT EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS - EROSIO CONTROL METHODS PER SWPPP. 46s.aB' FILL MATERIAL TO BE CREATED FRO' AN IDOT OFFSITE ROADWAY PROJECT. IDOT TO PROVIDE A 663 CERTIFICATION (IDOT AND IEPA KENDALL COUNTY NO AGREEMEN TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT (A-I NOTE: THIS SIGNATURE & SEAL ONLY APPLIES TO DESIGN INFORMATION ZONING) STRUCTURES TO BE PROPOSED w.scy��,,� = 06E-05)616 UNDER THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT. PREPARED BY HR GREEN, INC. (THIS SHEET ONLY) = Recisc61 • MONITORING OF FOX ROAD FOR $* PREN O OVAL O DEBRIS AND DIRT TO BE STRICTLY O ENFORCED BY CONTRACTOR AND INFORMATION INCLUDED WITHIN THIS PLAN SET WHICH HAS BEEN DAILY CLEANING AS REQUIRED. COMPLETED BY OTHER CONSULTANTS IS NOT CERTIFIED BY THIS <cINDS, CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC RESTRICTED SIGNATURE & SEAL. °nm1a��o��„ TO FOX ROAD ONLY(KENDALL CO. HWY NO. 1) KENDALL COUNTY (R-I ZONING) Dial 811 or 1-800-892-0123 NpQ..;:: ,i rh • WITH 7HE FOLLOWING o COUNTY KENDALL / C/TY-TOWNSHIP YORKVILLE-KENDALL TWP KENDALL COUNTY 465.25' SEC. &114 SEC. NO.# 06.TWP 36 N. RANGE 7 E (A-I ZONING) Know what's below. �2) Working Days before you dig 1 SPECIAL USE SITE PLAN — EVERGREEN FARM P R E L I M I N A R Y Excluding Sat.,Sun.&FkdWM) SCALE: 1" = 100' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C811beforeyoudig. m m a EVERGREEN FARM — SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST "0 oiT i Dws PLAN COUNCIL CIOSMO� UESCRIPTION a � o � - oA o < � -_ D Construction mo D= coal city, Illinois 60416 HRGreen.com om O N oz .n 4 N - HRGreen 3/8/2012 10:25:44 AM, 1:1 HRGFreen March 7, 2012 Ms. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble,AICP Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 RE: Evergreen Farm Estates HR Green Job No.: 88110413 Dear Ms. Barksdale-Noble: HR Green, Inc. (HR Green) has received the comment letter United City of Yorkville dated February 24, 2012. Below is a point-by-point response to that letter. Comment 1: A Site Development Plan and Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan are required to be submitted to the City's engineering consultant for review and permit approval to ensure compliance with Title 8, Chapter 13: Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control of the Yorkville Municipal Code. The following information must be included: • Method of dust control • Method of cleaning Fox Road • General method of how fill will be placed, including comment on whether north and south parcels will be filled at the same time. • Detail on control measures • Delineation of Floodplain on the Site Plan Response 1: Noted and to be addressed within the Site Development Permit and final engineering documents in a forthcoming submittal just after the Public Hearing Meeting as discussed in Plan Council. Upon City request and to be listed within the Site Development Permit the contractor can provide a list of equipment used for dust control and equipment to be used for cleaning measures on Fox Road. Research of best available data included previously submitted documents on this property and current FIRM Map Panel#0040G, Map Number 17093CO04OG yields that there is no delineated floodplain onsite for this subject area. HRGreen.com Phone 630.553.7560 Fax 630.553.7646 Toll Free 800.728.7805 651 Prairie Pointe Drive,Suite 201,Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Ms.Krysti J.Barksdale-Noble United City of Yorkville Evergreen Farms Estates HR Green Job No.:88110413 March 7,2012 Page 2 Comment 2: Proposed Temporary Entrances to the property on the north side of Fox Road and south side of Fox Road will need to be permitted through Kendall County's Highway Department. Confirmation of permit application shall be provided to the City. Response 2: Noted and HR Green has been in coordination with the County Engineer and a temporary Highway Access permit is to be filed and secured permit forwarded to the City for reference. Comment 3: Please provide a brief narrative with regards to anticipated truckloads per day and per peak hour, truck traffic, days and hours of operations, truck template illustrating truck maneuverability into and out of proposed temporary construction access points. Response 3: Overall timeframe of this project was discussed at plan council and the project duration of one to two years is assumed based on project analysis. The truckloads per day will vary from a day to day operating standpoint and it is anticipated to have a peak of 20-25 trucks per day. Also please note that there will be days that no trucks will be running to this site at all. Operating hours for this project site would follow the City Ordinance and it was also discussed that a dozer/sheepsfoot blade would be operating possibly once a week to level off the dirt in lifts that was brought into the site. Majority of the grading operation would be focused on one side of the site at one time and there is no intention of having both the north and south sides of the site open at the some time. The temporary construction entrance will accommodate trucks entering and exiting at the some time with the appropriate turning radii. Also warning signage is to be proposed on Fox Road to warn motorists that "Trucks Entering Highway"in both directions. Comment 4: Please provide additional details regarding proposed alternate field entrance off of Pavilion Road. Response 4: Pavillion Road temporary entrance is to be removed and not to be used as an alternate to this site. Comment 5: Please confirm no temporary or permanent buildings and/or structures will be erected on the property during the proposed operation. H77en.00m Ms.Krysti J.Barksdale-Noble United City of Yorkville Evergreen Farms Estates HR Green Job No.:88110413 March 7,2012 Page 3 Response 5: No temporary or permanent buildings will be erected for the special use permit operations that are being proposed. Comment 6: Please verify if the property or the areas designated for temporary fill stockpile be secured with fencing or other method of protection. Response 6: Disturbed grading areas to be protected by perimeter silt fencing and other soil erosion measures are to be proposed for this site. Comment 7: Please confirm construction traffic will be limited to Fox Road and will not utilize Pavilion Road to access the property. Response 7: Per discussions at the Plan Council meeting, only Fox Road will be allow for the construction traffic and only posted or legal loads will be allowed. Comment 8: A Street Cleaning deposit shall be established with the City of Yorkville in the amount of$ 5,000.00 as part of the soil erosion and sedimentation control plan approval and grading permit issuance. Response 8: Noted. Comment 9: Additional deposit/bonding may be required for Fox Road as security for repair of any damage to the roadway resulting from the proposed operation. Fees will be determined upon receipt and review of the Site Development Plan. Response 9: Noted and a roadway bond was discussed at the Plan Council Meeting and to be determined at Site Development Permit if required. HF�Green.00m Ms.Krysti J.Barksdale-Noble United City of Yorkville Evergreen Farms Estates HR Green Job No.:88110413 March 7,2012 Page 4 If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at 630-708-5002. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC. David W. Schultz, P.E., LEED AP BD+C Project Manager DWS/pam cc: Mr.Joseph Phillips, Brandon Road Properties, LLC O:\88110413\D e s i g n\C o rr\I t r-030712-co m m e n t_re s po n se_Yo rkvi I l e.d ocx HRGreen.com HRGreen March 7, 2012 Mr. Bradley P. Sanderson, P.E. Vice President Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 RE: Evergreen Farms Estates HR Green Job No.: 88110413 Dear Mr. Sanderson: HR Green, Inc. (HR Green) has received the comment letter from Engineering Enterprises, Inc. dated February 17, 2012. Below is a point-by-point response to that letter. Comment 1: Prior to any fill being placed on site, a detailed grading plan with a soil erosion and sedimentation control plan should be provided. The plan should describe at the minimum the following: • Locations and detail of the proposed entrances to the site • Description of proposed haul routes • Method of dust control • Method of cleaning Fox Road • General method of how fill will be placed, including comment on whether north and south parcels will be filled at the same time. Response 1: Noted and to be addressed at time of Site Development Permit in a forthcoming submittal after the scheduled Public Hearing Meeting. Comment 2: In addition, a site development permit application will need to be submitted to our office for review. Response 2: Noted and to be submitted mid-March for City review. HFlGreen.com Phone 630.553.7560 Fax 630.553.7646 Toll Free 800.728.7805 651 Prairie Pointe Drive,Suite 201,Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Mr.Bradley P.Sanderson,P.E. Engineering Enterprises,Inc. Evergreen Farms Estates HR Green Job No.:88110413 March 7,2012 Page 2 Comment 3: Access points off of Pavillion Road should not be allowed. Response 3: Noted and final engineering plans for the Site Development Permit to reflect this. Comment 4: Fox Road in the area of the site in question is a County Highway. A permit will be required from them for any proposed entrance improvements. Response 4: Noted and HR Green has been in coordination with the County Engineer and a temporary Highway Access permit is to be filed. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at 630-708-5002. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC. David W. Schultz, P.E., LEED AP BD+C Project Manager DWS/pam cc: Mr.Joseph Phillips, Brandon Road Properties, LLC 0:\88110413\Design\Corr\ltr-030712-comment_response_EE I.docx HRGreen.com PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION PC 2012-02 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT D. Construction Management, Petitioner, on behalf of Brandon Road Properties, LLC, Owner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting a authorization within the R-2 One-Family Residence District to temporarily fill low areas and grade portions of the site with uncontaminated soil from roadway projects of the State of Illinois and return to agriculture uses as allowed by Special Use Permit in Section 10-6C-2 and Section 10-613- 2 of the United City of Yorkville City Code. The real property consists of approximately 46.5 acres, located at the northeast and southeast corners of Fox Road and Pavilion Road (Evergreen Farm Estates) in Yorkville, Illinois. The legal description is as follows: THAT PART OF SECTION 6, TOWHSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINICIPAL MERIDAN DESCRIBED BY COMMENCING A THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 6; THENCE WEST 233.9 EET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 6 TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY; THENCE SOUTH 61° 06' 20" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 1488.52 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01° 28' 38" EAST 406.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 250 19' 10" EAST 1326.82 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 24° 05' 33" EAST 587.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 660 45' 42" WEST 1560.96 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF A GRAVEL ROAD; THENCE NORTH 22° 15' 40" WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 1258.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 06° 13' 10" WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID GRAVEL ROAD 250.27 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF FOX ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 63° 42' 50" WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF FOX ROAD 43.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08° 38' 52" WEST 676.69 FEET TO THE AFORESAID SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; THENCE NORTH 61° 06' 20" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OFWAY LINE 1431.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN KENDALL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY 350.0 FEET OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY 469.81 FEET THEREOF AND ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING PARCEL OF PROPERTY FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING AFORESAID; THENCE SOUTH 01° 28' 38" EAST 406.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 250 19' 10" EAST 305.69 FEET TO THE CENTER LINE OF FOX ROAD FOR A NEW POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 25° 19' 10" EAST 1021.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 24° 50' 33" EAST 587.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 660 45' 42" WEST 625.43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25° 19' 10" WEST 1540.44 FEET TO SAID CENTER LINE OF FOX ROAD; THENCE NORTH 63° 42' 50" EAST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE 630.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN KENDALL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Permanent Index Number(PIN): 05-06-100-012 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the Plan Commission for the United City of Yorkville will conduct a Public Hearing on said Special Use application on Wednesday, March 14, 2012 at 7 p.m. at the Yorkville City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, 60560. The public hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice being published. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. Any written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville City Clerk, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, and will be accepted up to the date of the public hearing. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. Beth Warren City Clerk By: Lisa Pickering Deputy Clerk DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION City Council Chambers Wednesday,March 14, 2012 7:00pm Commission Members in Attendance: Chairman Tom Lindblom Michael Crouch Art Prochaska Charles Kraupner James Weaver Absent: Jane Winninger, Sandra Adams, Jack Jones, Jeff Baker Other City Staff City Administrator Bart Olson Alderman Larry Kot Alderman George Gilson Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Other Guests— See lists of attendees Meeting Called to Order Chairman Tom Lindblom called the meeting to order at 7:12pm. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Previous Meeting Minutes - February 8, 2012 The minutes were approved on a motion by Crouch and second by Kraupner. Voice vote approval. Citizen's Comments None Public Hearings 2. PC 2012-02 D. Construction Management, Petitioner, on behalf of Brandon Road Properties, is requesting authorization within the R-2 One- Family District to temporarily fill low areas and grade portions of a site located at the northeast and southeast corners of Fox Road and Pavilion Road (Evergreen Farm Estates) with uncontaminated soil from roadway projects of the State of Illinois and return to agricultural uses as allowed by Special Use Permit in Section 10-6CO2 and Section 10-6B-2 of the United City of Yorkville City Code. A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Prochaska and Weaver respectively to enter into Public Hearing. Voice vote approval. Hearing commenced at 6:13pm. 1 Chairman Lindblom swore in those who would speak. A motion was also made to reverse the order of the agenda items. Crouch moved and Prochaska seconded a motion to reverse the order. Voice vote approval. Public Hearing concluded at 8:57pm on a motion by Weaver and second by Prochaska. Voice vote approval. (See Court Reporter's Narrative) Old Business None New Business Same as above Public Hearing PC 2012-02. Discussion: Chairman Lindblom said this request will come before the City Council for a final vote on April 10th. He then asked for comments from the Plan Commission. Commissioner Prochaska said the proposal is well-intentioned, however, there should be a more suitable location for holding the dirt and filling in the property for future development. Drainage is also an issue as well as Fox Road needing improvement. The impact will be large and two years of heavy trucks will be detrimental to the road that is already cracking. He said there is no provision for the end result of the road. Commissioner Weaver agreed with Mr. Prochaska and added there are too many questions to move forward with this request. He said there is the possibility of endangerment of public health. Mr. Crouch said there should be a stipulation that the dirt can only come from the Rt. 47 and that only clean fill be allowed. He felt some questions asked were not clearly answered. Other questions need defining such as how many trucks will use Fox Road daily. Drainage is another issue according to Mr. Crouch, especially with the addition of 4 or 5 feet of dirt to the property. There is a possibility that wells could be contaminated. He is concerned with foot traffic on Fox Road and said that it is not safe. He would like to see the Special Use more clearly defined to answer the questions raised in this Hearing. Commissioner Kraupner said he agreed with the other Commissioners and thanked all attendees for their opinions. Addressing the special use issue, Ms. Barksdale-Noble said when a development comes before the Commission, there is a plan and traffic engineering is done, however, this type of development has no permanent use or building and a traffic engineering study is not required since it is a temporary use. She said there is not the usual level of detail due to the temporary status. Mr. Prochaska addressed the "standards"which the Commission must consider when making a decision. Chairman Lindblom said some of the "standards"have not been met, 2 but if there is an affirmative vote, the special conditions must be attached to the Special Use. This Special Use request is a permitted use according to Attorney Gary Davidson and fulfills the requirements of a Special Use under the zoning ordinance and is permitted in the Comp Plan. Motion: Chairman Lindblom entertained a motion to recommend approval of PC 2012-02 with the following staff stipulations: establish two temporary entrances, require deposit for possible damages to Rt. 47, subject to site development plan and sediment control plan, soil be strictly from the Rt. 47 project. So moved by Michael Crouch and seconded by Art Prochaska. Roll call vote: Prochaska-no, Weaver-no, Crouch-no, Kraupner-no, Lindblom-no. Motion fails 0-5. Due to the lateness of the hour, Mr. Prochaska moved to continue the Public Hearing for PC 2012-01 to the next scheduled meeting. Mr. Weaver seconded the motion. Voice vote approval. Additional Business None Adjournment The meeting was adjourned on a motion by Prochaska and second by Kraupner. Meeting adjourned at 9:23pm. Respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS PLAN COMMISSION MEETING PUBLIC HEARING 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7 : 00 p .m. D-965812 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 2 1 PRESENT : 2 Mr . Tom Lindblom, Chairman, 3 Mr . Michael Crouch, 4 Mr . Charles Kraupner, 5 Mr . Art Prochaska, 6 Mr . James Weaver . 7 8 9 ALSO PRESENT : 10 Ms . Krysti Noble, Community Development 11 Director; 12 Ms . Julie Morrison, Engineering 13 Enterprises; 14 Ms . Marlys Young, Minute Taker . 15 - - - 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 3 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Entertain a motion 2 to go to public hearing. 3 MR. PROCHASKA: Moved. 4 MR. WEAVER: Second. 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Moved and seconded. 07 : 08PM 6 Those in favor signify by saying aye. 7 (A chorus of ayes . ) 8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Opposed? 9 (No response. ) 10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Motion passes. 07:09PM 11 At this time I would like anybody 12 that thinks they're going to speak before the 13 Commission to stand, raise your right hand and 14 repeat after me. 15 (The witnesses were 07:09PM 16 thereupon duly sworn. ) 17 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: At this time then 18 could I have a motion to reverse the agenda items 19 to bring PC 2012-02 first? 20 MR. CROUCH: So moved. 07 : 09PM 21 MR. PROCHASKA: Second. 22 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Moved and seconded. 23 Those in favor? 24 (A chorus of ayes . ) DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 4 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Opposed? 2 (No response. ) 3 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. We will now 4 be in public hearing for PC 2012-02, 5 D. Construction Management, Petitioner, on behalf 07:10PM 6 of Brandon Road Properties, LLC, Owner, is 7 requesting authorization within the R2 One-Family 8 District to temporarily fill low areas and grade 9 portions of a site located at the northeast and 10 southeast corners of Fox Road and Pavilion Road, 07:10PM 11 Evergreen Farm Estates, with uncontaminated soil 12 from roadway projects of the State of Illinois and 13 return to agricultural uses as allowed by special 14 use permit in Section 10-6C-2 and Section 10-6B-2 15 of the United City of Yorkville City Code. 07:10PM 16 And who is here to speak on behalf 17 of the petitioner? Do you wish to move to the 18 microphone and the podium? 19 MR. DAVIDSON: Yes . 20 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: And then for the 07:10PM 21 record state your name. 22 MR. DAVIDSON: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 23 Gary Davidson with the law firm of Brumund, 24 Jacobs, Hammel, Davidson & Andreano, 58 East DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 5 1 Clinton, Suite 200, Joliet, Illinois, 60432 . 2 Mr. Chairman, members of the board, 3 tonight before you is petitioner's application for 4 a special use to allow for the filling of holes 5 and areas that are low on what is formerly the 07 : 11PM 6 Evergreen Farm parcel. 7 I understand from the number of 8 people here that there are a number of questions 9 and concerns, and I actually had an opportunity to 10 see the flyer because I grew up in Fox Lawn, so my 07: 11PM 11 mom got the flyer so she sent it over to me and 12 wondered what I was involved in. 13 And I grew up in Fox Lawn at a time 14 when the only subdivisions out on Fox Road were 15 the Pavilion Heights and Fox Lawn subdivisions. 07:11PM 16 So there are a number of myths 17 associated with what's going on here, put very 18 simply, and then I'm going to just allow questions 19 to be answered because you are not here to listen 20 to me, we are here to answer your questions, and 07 : 12PM 21 we want to make sure that you understand that 22 we're here to become a part of this community and 23 make the community better. 24 And this is not a dump. We are DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 6 1 simply doing the following: We are moving dirt 2 from one area of Yorkville and placing that dirt 3 in another area of Yorkville. 4 The placing of that dirt on that 5 site is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan 07 : 12PM 6 of the City of Yorkville and the city plan in that 7 in 2006 the Planning and Zoning Commission and the 8 City Council approved an annexation agreement for 9 the development of that site, and in order to 10 develop that site, for those who may not know 07: 12PM 11 about the development process, you are required 12 to bring in dirt to level the area, so much like 13 the area that's actually immediately across from 14 this site -- it was some of my best bullfrog 15 hunting grounds when I was growing up as a kid 07:13PM 16 because there was depressional areas -- when that 17 subdivision was built, dirt had to be brought in, 18 clean dirt, spread out, and then homes were 19 allowed to be built. 20 So in order to effectuate the 07 : 13PM 21 orderly development of Yorkville and in order to 22 effectuate the development of Route 47 and the 23 expansion of Route 47, it' s necessary to take that 24 dirt and move it off-site to an area that is DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 7 1 suitable for that dirt, and this particular site 2 is in need of clean fill in order for us to have 3 that as a residential zoning area at such time as 4 the economy improves and a developer can come in 5 there and develop the 77-unit subdivision that was 07:14PM 6 previously brought before the Council back in 7 2006. 8 So with all that being said, I know 9 that we've probably got a lot of questions. What 10 we're here for tonight is a special use, not site 07: 14PM 11 development. I noticed that a number of the 12 questions are site development related. 13 Obviously that's within the 14 discretion of the Chair for us to address those 15 issues tonight. Since all of you folks are here, 07:14PM 16 there' s no reason that we can't speak to some of 17 those issues, and I 'll leave it up to the Chair as 18 to, you know, which ones that you -- you know, how 19 far along we go with respect to that. 20 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Anything else then 07:14PM 21 from the petitioner at this time? 22 MR. DAVIDSON: Nothing at this time. 23 The Staff recommendations are in your packet, as 24 well as our responses to all of the questions that DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 8 1 were previously brought about by the Plan 2 Commission. 3 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. I'm going to 4 recommend that the sheets that were passed out -- 5 There is 20 questions on here. Shall we save 07:15PM 6 maybe some time and energy and maybe run through 7 those questions and then see if others surface 8 after that? 9 MR. DAVIDSON: Yeah. 10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Is that acceptable 07:15PM 11 to you? 12 MR. DAVIDSON: What I 'm going to do is 13 I 'm going to have David Schultz from HR Green, 14 which is our engineering and planning firm that is 15 helping us, address those questions, and perhaps I 07:15PM 16 will chime in when I think it's legal in nature. 17 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. I'll run 18 through these. I see a hand up. Yes, ma'am. 19 MS. FISCHER: Do you have copies -- 2 0 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Excuse me. Stand 07 : 15PM 21 and raise your hand, please. Stand and state your 22 name. 23 MS. FISCHER: Julie Fischer. Not 24 everyone has a copy of these 20 questions. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 9 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: I 'll read the 2 questions so you can all hear it and then we'll 3 get the answer. 4 MS. FISCHER: We can't take notes on -- 5 I just -- 07:16PM 6 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Can you share with 7 somebody, please, so we can keep moving? 8 MR. PROCHASKA: Here. 9 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Do we have any more 10 up here? 07:16PM 11 MR. KRAUPNER: Yeah, there is a few more 12 here. 13 MR. DAVIDSON: Here is a few copies. 14 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Are we ready? 15 Question number one, Why issue a special use 07:16PM 16 permit for dumping activity in the area zoned R2 17 residential and agriculture? 18 MR. DAVIDSON: I 'll tackle this and 19 then, Dave, why don't you go ahead and come in 20 from an engineering perspective? 07: 17PM 21 First of all, this is not dumping, 22 this is simply filling and grading, and this 23 filling and grading is done with any residential 24 development that comes before a city in any -- in DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 10 1 any county or in any municipality in the state of 2 Illinois. 3 There is always going to be more or 4 less filling and grading in order to develop a 5 residential subdivision, and it's in conformance 07:17PM 6 with the annexation agreement that was passed in 7 2006 in that it specifically allowed for filling 8 and grading, so for the future use and for the 9 vision that was set forth by the United City of 10 Yorkville in their Comprehensive Plan for this 07: 17PM 11 area, in order to have residential R2 zoning in 12 this area, you are going to have to have clean 13 fill put in there. 14 And parenthetically I will just say 15 that in this particular case, it's almost the 07:18PM 16 ideal situation in that the Illinois Department of 17 Transportation, the Illinois IEPA, are going to be 18 monitoring because it' s their project after all to 19 improve Route 47 for the citizens of Yorkville. 20 They are going to be monitoring all 07 : 18PM 21 of the material that's taken as it relates to that 22 Route 47 inter -- the Route 47 improvements, and 23 so, therefore, all of that is going to be tested, 24 it's going to be required to be tested by the IEPA DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 11 1 and IDOT, and it will not be able to be placed on 2 the site. 3 And attached to the petition, as the 4 members of the planning and zoning board are well 5 aware, is a letter from Enmarc & Associates, which 07:18PM 6 actually indicates that the fill will be placed on 7 the site and the standards by which we're going to 8 determine whether or not there is -- any 9 contamination in that soil is going to exceed all 10 of the current standards. 07: 19PM 11 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Krysti? 12 MS. NOBLE: Sure. I 'm going to respond 13 to that first question as well from the City's 14 perspective. 15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Will you please hold 07:19PM 16 your questions until we run through these and then 17 we can come back and see if we missed anything? 18 MS. NOBLE: The City' s zoning ordinance 19 which applies to this property as R2 identifies 20 filling holes, pits and lowlands and 07 : 19PM 21 non-combustible use -- soil as an allowable 22 special use. 23 The petitioner would have been 24 allowed to do this without a public hearing had DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 12 1 this been done in conjunction with the development 2 of the Evergreen Estates parcel. 3 In their annexation agreement, they 4 were permitted to do this type of excavating and 5 filling on the site, but it would have to be after 07:19PM 6 the preliminary plan approval, which the plan had 7 never gotten to that point, and it would have to 8 be in conjunction, as I said, with development on 9 the site. 10 So the only reason why they're 07:20PM 11 coming here is to fulfill the general R2 12 underlying zoning requirements, which would state 13 that they would need a special use for this type 14 of activity. 15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Question 07:20PM 16 number two, Why consider this permit for dumping 17 in a floodplain? 18 MR. DAVIDSON: I 'll let the engineer 19 address that one. 20 MR. SCHULTZ: Again, my name is David 07:20PM 21 Schultz. I work with Evergreen here in Yorkville. 22 I 'm a Yorkville resident and I 've been a 23 professional engineer and worked with this company 24 for the last 16 years. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 13 1 The best available data that I have 2 researched regarding this project is according to 3 the FIRM maps and FEMA panels -- 4 THE AUDIENCE: We can't hear. Speak up. 5 MR. SCHULTZ: Sorry. Is this on? 07 :20PM 6 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: I don't think it's 7 on. 8 MR. SCHULTZ: Sorry about that. I guess 9 I 'll speak up. May I sit? 10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Sure. 07:21PM 11 MR. SCHULTZ: Again, David Schultz, HR 12 Green, professional engineer. The best available 13 data that I have looked up on what' s called a FIRM 14 map and FEMA panels that are put out regarding 15 floodplain, this property is within a Zone X, 07:21PM 16 which means there is no current study of 17 floodplain on this property, so there is no 18 floodplain delineated on this property. 19 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Question number 20 three, Why consider this permit in the area with 07 :21PM 21 an extreme elevation differential draining 22 directly onto the floodplain? 23 Of which it was just determined 24 there was not a floodplain, but in essence, DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 14 1 draining somewhere. 2 MR. SCHULTZ: We are currently zoned for 3 residential, as we had heard. This is part of the 4 land development process for this parcel. Again, 5 we not draining directly into a floodplain unless 07 :22PM 6 you call the Fox River, which is floodplain. 7 But all sediment and erosion control 8 measures would be provided on this property just 9 as traditional land development would be. 10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. I don't think 07:22PM 11 you have anything for that. 12 MS. NOBLE: No. 13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Item four, Why would 14 you allow heavy truck traffic through a 15 residential area on one of the few good roads we 07:22PM 16 have? 17 MR. DAVIDSON: I 'll address -- I 'll 18 address part of that and then I 'll let Dave 19 address the other half of that. 20 We're going to be required, and D. 07 :22PM 21 Construction and Brandon Road Properties takes 22 very seriously their obligation, to post money 23 with the City for any damage that's done to the 24 roadway. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 15 1 However, what is important to 2 understand is that we're going to be obligated and 3 we're going to be required to observe the road 4 load limits as it relates to Fox Road, so all 5 vehicles that are going to travel on Fox Road are 07 :23PM 6 going to be at or below the load limits required 7 for Fox Road as determined by the guys that can 8 run the numbers, the engineers. I don't pretend 9 to be able to do that. But those all will be 10 governed by that standard. Now, again -- 07:23PM 11 MR. OLSON: Do you want this? 12 MR. DAVIDSON: Thanks. I don't think 13 I 'll have a problem. Dave might. Again, it's 14 important to realize that this is an Illinois 15 Department of Transportation project which is 07:23PM 16 necessary for the orderly development of our 17 community, Yorkville, and so the Illinois 18 Department of Transportation is going to be 19 heavily involved with people on-site that are 20 going to be monitoring my client and monitoring 07:24PM 21 what's going on out on that project, and then Dave 22 with respect to just the general engineering of 23 it. 24 MR. SCHULTZ: And also just to follow-up DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 16 1 with that, this is a county road which also has 2 city limits up to I believe River's Edge, so it is 3 a shared municipal use between City of Yorkville 4 and Kendall County. 5 And again, what Gary had said, this 07 :24PM 6 is posted -- post-weight, so we have to monitor 7 that and stay within the posted weights of this 8 road, and again, it's a county highway. 9 MS. NOBLE: To further address that 10 comment, Fox Road is not a posted road, so the 07:24PM 11 maximum is 8, 000 pounds. That' s any state road. 12 Also what's key to remember is this 13 is a public road. We cannot limit public traffic 14 on a public road. What we can do is make sure 15 that it is not an overweight capacity with each 07:25PM 16 truck that goes by, and we will be monitoring 17 that. 18 We will not be issuing any 19 overweight permits. I 've gotten confirmation from 20 the County that they will not be issuing any 07 :25PM 21 overweight vehicle permits for this road, so it 22 will meet capacity of what it was designed to do, 23 which is carry a load of 80, 000 pounds per -- not 24 axle, but per -- DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 17 1 MR. SCHULTZ: Unit. 2 MS. NOBLE: -- per vehicle. 3 Also, the County has jurisdiction 4 over them getting a permit to access the site, not 5 the City, but the County does, and if the County 07 :25PM 6 issues that permit, we cannot restrict any public 7 vehicle, any vehicle, using the roadway. 8 They have been cooperative with the 9 City and willing to put up a security for any 10 damage, extreme damage, that they could possibly 07:26PM 11 do in this situation, and we will be -- the City 12 and the City engineering consultant will be 13 reviewing the more specific site plan as they move 14 forward with this to determine what that bonding 15 or security would be. 07:26PM 16 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Question 17 number five, What guarantee of restoration back to 18 ag use is there at the end of this project 19 considering the City's backsliding on bond 20 protection and other developments in the City? 07 :26PM 21 MR. DAVIDSON: Well, we don't have any 22 present intent to develop this as residential 23 lots, and, quite frankly, I would like to say that 24 we would hope that we could sell this property and DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 18 1 sell it to a residential developer at the end of 2 the one to two-year period and have housing out on 3 that site, so there is no guarantee that it 4 would -- We want it to go back to agriculture 5 because we want to be taxed on agriculture and it 07 :27PM 6 is agriculture, but as it relates to the future 7 use of the site, the future use of the site is 8 clearly residential. 9 Now, because Yorkville has more 10 platted undeveloped lots than almost every city in 07:27PM 11 the entire Midwest, I don't know if that's in the 12 near future, but we don't know. 13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Question six, 14 What guarantees do property owners have that this 15 dumping project will not adversely affect their 07:27PM 16 property values? 17 MR. DAVIDSON: The -- Again, it' s simply 18 not a dumping area, we are filling and grading, so 19 we are taking a property which is unimproved and 20 we're effectively moving it down the road of 07 :28PM 21 entitlement to make it more valuable for a future 22 developer of that site and to make it in 23 conformance with residential zoning and make it -- 2 4 you know, make it in conformance so that DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 19 1 residential zoning can be there. 2 To the extent that housing is placed 3 on that site, there is all sorts of empirical data 4 that suggests that if your subdivision is located 5 next to a developed site, your property values are 07 :28PM 6 going to go up and not down. 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Item seven, 8 Why is it the City' s responsibility to issue a 9 special use permit to D. Construction for this 10 project, question mark. D. Construction can find 07:28PM 11 an off-site location that is already zoned 12 industrial or is compatible with this type of use. 13 MR. DAVIDSON: That's actually in my 14 opinion a decision for this Planning and Zoning 15 Commission. You have the standards by which it is 07:29PM 16 obligatory to issue a special use permit if we 17 satisfy the criteria set forth in the ordinance, 18 but I will leave that to the members of this board 19 to make that determination. 20 MS. NOBLE: The function of the special 07 :29PM 21 use is the City has designated uses that they deem 22 appropriate in the zoning category, but would like 23 further control over how those uses are developed 24 or operated within that certain category, so it's DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 20 1 already a permitted, identified use as a special 2 use in the residential zoning, so the City at some 3 point in creating its zoning ordinance felt like 4 this was an appropriate and compatible use in a 5 residential district. 07 :29PM 6 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Number 7 eight -- I think maybe we've answered this 8 already, but I will read it -- Why would the city 9 allow Fox Road to be further impacted by a steady 10 stream of dump trucks, accelerating the demise of 07:30PM 11 the road, especially considering the fact that the 12 River Road closing is already putting an extra 13 strain of traffic on Fox Road? 14 MR. DAVIDSON: You know, that just 15 appears to be a statement, not a question. I 07:30PM 16 don't know what to -- 17 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: The question was -- 18 the question first, Why would the City allow Fox 19 Road to be further impacted by a steady stream of 20 dump trucks, accelerating the demise of the road, 07:30PM 21 question mark. 22 MR. DAVIDSON: Well, again, it's 23 necessary for the public welfare in that we're -- 2 4 we're improving Route 47 . It's a public highway DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 21 1 the trucks can be on already, so it's an allowable 2 use to use that highway for roadway traffic, just 3 like the farmer takes his combine out there during 4 the fall and drives down the road and drives into 5 the cornfield. 07 : 31PM 6 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: What guarantee for 7 the public safety is there, especially considering 8 Fox Road is regularly used by the high school 9 track team, bicyclists and joggers? 10 MR. DAVIDSON: Well, all of our drivers 07:31PM 11 are CDL drivers and they're -- they're regularly 12 drug tested, they can't consume alcohol during 13 work hours, and I think that the commercial 14 vehicle driving on that road is going to be just 15 as safe, if not safer, than any normal pedestrian 07:31PM 16 vehicle. 17 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Item 10, With 18 property values already plummeting in Yorkville, 19 why would the City put an additional negative 20 impact on property values? 07 : 31PM 21 MR. DAVIDSON: We don't view it as a 22 negative impact. We view it with in conformance 23 with the orderly development of the City of 24 Yorkville's Comprehensive Plan, the previous DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 22 1 annexation agreement, and what the City's vision 2 for the future of that site is. 3 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Item 11, With 4 the Hoover Forest Preserve adjacent to the dumping 5 site, what protections are in place for the forest 07 : 32PM 6 preserve? 7 MR. DAVIDSON: I 'll let Dave answer that g one. 9 MR. SCHULTZ: The biggest thing between 10 our property and the property to the north, which 07:32PM 11 is the forest preserve, is the railroad tracks. 12 We have to still follow IEPA 13 standards, we have to following erosion, sediment, 14 erosion control. These are all done through the 15 site development permit and best engineering 07:32PM 16 practices. 17 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: How about 18 the Hoover? 19 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Item number 12. 20 MR. SCHULTZ: Hoover is not adjacent to 07 : 32PM 21 the site. 22 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: We' ll give you a 23 chance to ask questions afterwards. Remember, 24 this is being recorded. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 23 1 Item 12, What guarantees of 2 protection are there for the private wells of the 3 adjacent homeowners? 4 MR. DAVIDSON: Dave, I 'll let you tackle 5 that one, too. 07:33PM 6 MR. SCHULTZ: Again, this is all 7 monitored by the IEPA, IDOT environmental 8 consultants, who will be monitoring D. 9 Construction and the roadway improvements where 10 this dirt is coming from, and essentially we're 07:33PM 11 left with dirt. Same dirt that's out there today. 12 I cannot provide any more guarantee 13 to you on contaminants or anything in that as 14 such, that' s not my expertise, just as saying such 15 as pesticides that are being put on the property 07:33PM 16 now and also your fertilizer that people put on 17 their yards today, I don't -- I can't -- I can't 18 comment on that. 19 MS. NOBLE: We do have our engineering 20 consultant that's here. I can tell you generally, 07:34PM 21 then I 'll let Julie tell you a little bit more. 22 There is a third-party contractor 23 that's been hired by the state to do the analysis 24 every time there is a soil sample that's going to DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 24 1 be moved to make sure that the soil is at a 2 quality for residential development, so any soil 3 that anybody here would view, if they ever leveled 4 their site and wanted to grade their site. 5 Right now they are called TACO 07:34PM 6 standards that the State uses. In July the State 7 is going to increase those standards to make sure 8 there is even more separation delineation between 9 contaminated soils and non-contaminated soils 10 which could be deemed usable in the residential 07:34PM 11 land use process. 12 Those standards, which don't go into 13 effect until later this summer, will be applied to 14 this project even though it's coming in before 15 that time, and Julie can tell you some more about 07:34PM 16 the standards. 17 MS. MORRISON: Good evening. I 'm Julie 18 Morrison with Engineering Enterprises. 19 As Krysti stated, the IEPA and the 20 State of Illinois have passed new legislation that 07 : 35PM 21 defines appropriate levels of contamination, 22 basically defining what is non-contaminated and 23 what is contaminated. 24 The IEPA and the State passed this DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 25 1 law as a point of protecting ground water, so it's 2 appropriate here to know that the levels that are 3 defined for non-contaminated soils are done so to 4 protect ground water, so all the clean soils going 5 to this site are technically non-contaminated 07:35PM 6 based on levels to protect ground water. 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Item 13, What 8 protections are in place for residents regarding 9 dust, noise, water, and soil pollution? 10 MR. DAVIDSON: All of those -- and, 07:35PM 11 Dave, I'll let you address that, but all of those 12 safeguards are going to be -- and standards are 13 going to be put on D. Construction and Brandon 14 Road Properties during the site development 15 process, that in the event that we were to get a 07:36PM 16 favorable recommendation of this board and get a 17 favorable recommendation by the City Council, 18 we'll then be back for site development, and all 19 of those standards will be imposed upon us by 20 recommendations from City Staff. 07 : 36PM 21 Just going back, don't -- Just going 22 back to item number 12 for one second, the idea -- 2 3 it's difficult to address what guarantees are in 24 place to protect private wells from what is DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 26 1 literally just a non-issue. 2 Again, we have to remember what this 3 is. This is removing clean dirt from one area of 4 Yorkville, moving it in a truck, and placing that 5 clean dirt on a site that needs it in another area 07:36PM 6 of Yorkville. 7 So if we take it out of the context 8 of all of the discussions that we had in years 9 past regarding landfills and dump sites, that is 10 not what this is. 07:37PM 11 That flyer that my mother received 12 at Birch Court East in Fox Lawn where I grew up, 13 that indicated that this was a dump. This is not 14 a dump. So it' s very -- it's very important for 15 everyone to understand that. 07:37PM 16 And so when I 'm answering these 17 questions, I want you to be clear, I want your 18 questions to be addressed and I want your 19 questions to be answered because there was a lot 20 of myths that took place, and so I 'm glad that you 07 : 37PM 21 are here and I'm glad that we are able to address 22 them. 23 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Item number 24 14, What is the absolute drop-dead date for the DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 27 1 completion and restoration back to R2/ag use 2 zoning? 3 In other words, when will the 4 project be finished and revert back to ag? 5 MR. SCHULTZ: We've stated our intention 07:38PM 6 of one to two years would be the duration of this 7 project. I don't -- I don't have a drop-dead 8 completion date. I don't know if -- if Joe and D. 9 Construction has a set -- per the IDOT letting, 10 has a set when this project is anticipated to be 07:38PM 11 done. From just discussions in operations, we're 12 looking at a two-year maximum. 13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Did the gentleman 14 over here have a response from D. Construction 15 or -- 07:38PM 16 MR. PHILLIPS: I 'm with Brandon Road 17 Properties. Julie, our environmental consultant, 18 and Bill SAVOREE will be project manager on-site 19 for the Route 47 project. 20 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: So you do or do not 07 : 38PM 21 have a schedule in place yet? 22 MR. SAVOREE: Well, not yet because 23 there is a lot of utility relocations going on, so 24 right now we're not sure when we can get started. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 28 1 It's a two-year plus project with working days and 2 that. 3 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. 4 MS. NOBLE: The Staff's recommendation 5 will be concurrent with the Route 47 project, so 07 : 39PM 6 at this time IDOT is setting the pace of when the 7 project began and then when it will be -- when it 8 will end. 9 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Number 15, What 10 guarantees are there that D. Construction will not 07:39PM 11 attempt to use this property for other road 12 projects, such as the River Road project, Eldamain 13 Road or other projects? 14 MR. DAVIDSON: I don't know what the 15 intent of my client is with respect to that. 07:39PM 16 We're going to be required to have clean dirt 17 placed on that site. We've got plenty of dirt for 18 Route 47, and probably more than -- than will fill 19 that site just for the Route 47 project, so we've 20 got our hands full with Route 47 . 07:40PM 21 I don't know if the Brandon Road or 22 D. Construction folks have any comment with 23 respect to that. 24 MR. PHILLIPS: The majority of the fill DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 29 1 is Route 47 . I mean, I don't believe that there 2 is a lot of fill that comes off of some of the 3 other projects, so -- and they're not. . . 4 MR. DAVIDSON: But again, it's all going 5 to be governed by the standards and the special 07 : 40PM 6 uses as allowed, clean fill, all of those things. 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Item 16, What 8 guarantees for protections for public safety are 9 there for road debris that could contain oil, gas 10 or other hazardous compounds, question mark. 07:40PM 11 There are seven current or former 12 gas station sites in between Route 126 and 34 with 13 the likelihood of gas or oil and leaking -- or gas 14 or oil in leaking into the soil around them as 15 well as the petroleum by-products used in the 07:41PM 16 asphalt in the road which over time breaks down 17 the soil. 18 The question I guess is what' s the 19 protection for the oil or gas or other hazardous 20 compounds. 07 : 41PM 21 MR. DAVIDSON: And, Dave, I 'll let Dave 22 address that. There is an attachment to the 23 planning and zoning petition that the members of 24 the planning and zoning council have, and it's DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 30 1 our -- Enmarc & Associates who will be monitoring 2 all this. It's all going to be tested. 3 Anything that is contaminated -- I 4 guess let me address it this way. In the event 5 that there are products that are found to be 07 : 41PM 6 contaminated, those will be isolated and be 7 required to be taken to a different site. 8 So we're not coming in here saying 9 that we're going to grind up the road, we're going 10 to pull the dirt and it' s all going on that site. 07:42PM 11 That's not how it's going to work. 12 In fact, asphalt and concrete is 13 recyclable and we can make money on that, so we're 14 not going to want to use that as fill because it 15 has value, it can be sold, but it all can be 07:42PM 16 tested before being allowed to be located there 17 based on, again, standards which exceed the 18 current IEPA and IDOT guidelines. 19 MR. SCHULTZ: Again, again, we're 20 talking about the clean dirt that is going to be 07:42PM 21 shipped to this site. D. Construction does have 22 another site that they will take the contaminated 23 soils to, and this will all be run through IEPA 24 and the environmental folks that will be out there DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 31 1 monitoring that. 2 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Item 17, Can 3 the City afford another lawsuit for negligence? I 4 don't know that there is an answer to that. 5 Number 18 -- 07 : 43PM 6 MR. DAVIDSON: I can. The ones that win 7 in the end is the lawyers, but, you know, probably 8 nobody can. 9 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. 18, What is 10 the bond protection for impact on property values, 07:43PM 11 private wells and return to ag use? 12 MR. DAVIDSON: Well, Krysti probably 13 knows the answer to that better than I do. 14 MS. NOBLE: The bond -- Well, let' s go 15 back a couple of questions. There was a question 07:43PM 16 about debris being on the roadway. 17 With any permit that we issue for 18 grading or soil and sediment control plans, we do 19 require a $5, 000 street cleaning permit. That's 20 from any development, from a large development to 07 : 43PM 21 a small development. That's for street cleaning. 22 What we're asking here by the 23 petitioner would go above and beyond that. It's 24 not required. We have no real authority to demand DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 32 1 it. They have been very cooperative to provide 2 it. 3 Keep in mind, it's a city road. 4 It's no different if someone were to tear down 5 their house or do an addition to their house, the 07 : 44PM 6 soil level will be tantamount to the same soil 7 that is packaged and sold for residential land use 8 anywhere, so the guarantee -- I don't know if it 9 will be in the form of a bond or cash or letter of 10 credit, but that would be decided upon Staff when 07: 44PM 11 we get further information going to the process, 12 and what we'll look at -- and I understand your 13 concerns. 14 In 2009, the City did resurface 15 their portions of 5500 linear feet of Fox Road 07:44PM 16 from 47 to Poplar Drive, and we do have numbers, 17 actual numbers at that time, you know, the repair 18 costs, we will be looking at that, and we're not 19 going to be asking for anything astronomical from 20 them because it is a city -- it is a public road, 07:44PM 21 but it would be something that would satisfy if 22 there were major damage done to the road 23 specifically attributable to their use. 24 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Item 19, Who DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 33 1 would build homes in the future on a dump site 2 with questionable base and unknown soil quality? 3 MR. DAVIDSON: It's not a dump site. 4 There is -- and unknown soil quality. It' s not 5 unknown. I was talking to a few of my clients 07:45PM 6 when I walked in and we agreed to disagree on this 7 particular issue that' s before the Council, and 8 they happen to live on the former Crawford Farm, 9 which is across from Fox Lawn, and I had to 10 mention to them that that particular site, I saw 07:45PM 11 it be developed, and dump trucks got brought in 12 with dirt along my path that I used to take down 13 to the Fox River to go crappie fishing, and dirt 14 was filled in in that site, and that's how a 15 residential development is developed. 07:46PM 16 It's developed by having dirt 17 brought in to low depressional areas, other areas 18 that are higher, excavated, all done in 19 conformance with the subdivision control ordinance 20 of the city, all done in conformance with the site 07 : 46PM 21 development process, and that's all done in order 22 to effectuate the orderly development of a 23 community, and this particular site is zoned for 24 future R2 use, and in order to have R2 use on this DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 34 1 site, this is a necessary requirement to have R2 2 there, so there will not -- it' s not a dump site. 3 At the time that it' s developed, 4 there will be no questionable base. It will all 5 be tested by the engineers. And the quality of 07 : 47PM 6 the soil that's going to be going onto this 7 property is actually going to exceed standards 8 because again, we're talking about an Illinois 9 Department of Transportation road project. 10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Question 07:47PM 11 number 20, Is this property still bound by the 12 SSA' s that were part of the annexation formerly 13 leading out to the landfill property? 14 MS. NOBLE: This particular property 15 hasn't gotten to that stage yet. It's still a 07:47PM 16 conceptual plan, it hasn't gotten to the 17 preliminary stage. It hasn't gotten to the final 18 plat where they would contribute any 19 infrastructure costs to deem it part of an SSA 20 area. 07 : 47PM 21 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. That 22 completes those 20 questions . One question that 23 came to me before we started the meeting was 24 remember I said that whatever we decide here is a DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 35 1 recommendation to the City Council and the City 2 Council makes the final decision. 3 The question was asked when will 4 that go to Council. 5 MS. NOBLE: Yes. It will go on the 07 : 48PM 6 April 10th City Council meeting. 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: April 10th. Okay. 8 At this time then I will entertain questions from 9 the audience. If you will please, raise your 10 hand, I will recognize you. Stand, state your 07: 48PM 11 name, state your question, and then we'll see 12 which of the experts here needs to answer that. 13 Let' s start over here in the corner. 14 Gentleman behind the podium. 15 MR. WELZ: I 'm Mike Welz. I'm the 07:48PM 16 president of the White Oak Homeowner's 17 Association. We have several concerns with this 18 project, one being that there is no sidewalks 19 along Fox Road leading to our subdivision. It's 20 very narrow. It's not really a good situation 07 : 48PM 21 with all the trucks and additional traffic coming 22 down that roadway for our citizens. 23 There already have been multiple 24 accidents, you know, by our subdivision that have DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 36 1 really injured people and we don't want to see 2 this happen again. 3 I understand that there's going to 4 be ten to, you know, possibly a hundred trucks 5 coming each day, and that's a lot. We have a lot 07 : 49PM 6 of kids coming home from school, walking, and it's 7 a big concern with no sidewalks along that road 8 that there can be potential for accidents to 9 happen. 10 Also I 'd like to ask that for the 07:49PM 11 fill -- for the fill coming in, is it strictly 12 from the Route 47 project or is it from additional 13 projects that are unmonitored or un -- that we 14 don't know about? Thank you. 15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: And before you 07:49PM 16 answer that, could I ask, to help clarify that, 17 does anybody have an estimate at this time as to 18 how many trucks that are expected each day? 19 MR. DAVIDSON: Yeah, the -- At peak, 20 there will be 10 to 25 per day. That's on -- 07:50PM 21 that's on a peak day. Many days there won't be 22 any trucks. 23 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Now on to the 24 other question. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 37 1 MR. SCHULTZ: Yeah. Just to follow up, 2 it's based on the operation of what D. 3 Construction would be doing that day on the 4 improvements. 5 There may be days where they're 07 :50PM 6 going to be hauling dirt and there' s going to be 7 days, possibly even weeks, where they don't touch 8 it. 9 Also to follow up your concerns with 10 basically being, you know, the public right-of-way 07:50PM 11 and public safety, of these increased trucks being 12 put on the road, I don't know how else to -- you 13 know, to monitor that besides, you know, having 14 somebody be out there, but they have to follow the 15 laws of the state. 07:50PM 16 MR. WELZ: They are large trucks and 17 it's a small road. That's a concern. 18 MR. SCHULTZ: It's a concern probably 19 elsewhere, too, in the city. I don't -- I didn't 20 design that road. 07:50PM 21 MR. WELZ: And no sidewalks. That's a 22 real concern for me. 23 MR. DAVIDSON: To put it -- to put it 24 into context -- and I don't think -- we have not DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 38 1 done any traffic counts or anything. To put it 2 into context, if you were to take, you know, ten 3 trucks a day, relative to the number of cars that 4 go up and down Fox Road -- because, you know, 5 again, I lived there for 18 years until I went 07:51PM 6 away to college, although it's -- 7 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: It' s 8 changed. 9 MR. DAVIDSON: It's increased since you 10 folks moved there. 07:51PM 11 MR. WELZ: River Road is on there, too, 12 that doesn't help. 13 MR. DAVIDSON: The relative -- you are 14 talking about an increase of probably less than 15 five percent in terms of the gross traffic. 07:51PM 16 MS. NOBLE: To further that discussion, 17 their access point is in the county, so the 18 county, the county highway division, department, 19 will be looking at that. 20 They will be making recommendations 07:51PM 21 on access points, entrance and exit points, 22 required signage to let you know that trucks are 23 entering and exiting this site, so that's part of 24 their permit process review and improvement. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 39 1 MR. WELZ: And what are the guarantees 2 then that the fill is strictly from 47? 3 MR. DAVIDSON: Just what the folks from 4 Brandon Road Properties and D. Construction have 5 said, at this time we're not limiting the site to 07 :52PM 6 just Route 47 because there may be need to locate, 7 but according to Joe, we're not going to be -- 8 MR. PHILLIPS: No, there is enough fill 9 on Route 47 to do this site and take more away. 10 MS. NOBLE: There is a mechanism if the 07:52PM 11 Plan Commission wants to make it a condition of 12 the special use that it is only limited to that 13 soil that is taken from the Route 47 project. 14 MR. DAVIDSON: But understand, again, 15 when we're talking about developing any 07:52PM 16 residential subdivision, dirt is brought in, and 17 it has to be determined to be clean dirt, so it's 18 not unusual. 19 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Next 20 question, the gentleman in the red shirt right 07 : 53PM 21 here in front. 22 MR. HIRSCH: Don Hirsch. I live in 23 White Oaks. I guess you've been talking that the 24 IEPA and the IDOT is going to be monitoring all DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 40 1 this stuff. That's your big push. 2 If we start other projects, how do 3 we know that they're going to be involved to this 4 degree, soils, or anything coming from different 5 areas? 07:53PM 6 MS. NOBLE: They are required to 7 certify. If we need, I guess Jeanette can answer 8 that, but we can get load counts I guess. When 9 you certify soil, how many trucks come out, you 10 have to certify the soil. We can get load counts. 07:53PM 11 I guess that' s something that we can determine, 12 but their third-party independent environmentalist 13 will have to certify that. 14 MR. HIRSCH: On the Route 47 . 15 MS. NOBLE: Mm-hum. 07:53PM 16 MR. HIRSCH: Okay, but we just opened 17 this up to other potential fill, so -- 18 MS. NOBLE: We haven't yet. We haven't 19 yet. That is a condition of the special use, if 20 the Plan Commission decides to make it a 07:54PM 21 condition. We can limit it to that. 22 MR. HIRSCH: Do you think they will? 23 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: I 'm sorry? 24 MS. NOBLE: They are right here. You DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 41 1 will see the vote when I see it. 2 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. 3 Mr. HIRSCH: Thank you. 4 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Gentleman right here 5 in the second row. 07:54PM 6 MR. SCHNELLER: Has there been a 7 traffic -- 8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Sir, your name, 9 please? 10 MR. SCHNELLER: Oh, I 'm sorry. Ted 07:54PM 11 Schneller, Ford Estates. Has there been a traffic 12 study? 13 MR. DAVIDSON: No, there has not been a 14 traffic study. I mean, the traffic study would 15 only determine what the current usage of the road 07:54PM 16 is, so -- 17 MR. SCHNELLER: Well, there also -- I 18 mean, it's quantifiable as far as how much dirt is 19 going to be taken out of 47, so you can quantify 20 by that how many trucks are going to be required 07:54PM 21 to do that -- 2 2 MR. DAVIDSON: Sure. Absolutely. 23 MR. SCHNELLER: -- And, therefore, you 24 can make a traffic study, so without a traffic DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 42 1 study, how can we know what kind of impact this is 2 going to have? 3 MR. DAVIDSON: Well, absolutely. And we 4 have already put that in our petition. 5 MR. SCHNELLER: Well, how can it be 07:54PM 6 considered without a traffic study? For instance, 7 if the traffic study says there's going to be 8 gridlock at Fox and 47, because I have heard from 9 the Plan Commission that there could be up to 50 10 trucks a day, which is a hundred truck trips a 07:55PM 11 day. 12 Well, how can we even consider doing 13 this if we don't know what it's going to do? 14 That's just number one. 15 Number two, has there been a study 07:55PM 16 with regard to drainage? You say it' s going to 17 drain to an area that' s floodplain. 18 Is there an engineering study to 19 tell me how many acre feet of water are going to 20 be drained? Have there been studies with regard 07 : 55PM 21 to the noise and the pollution? Have there been 22 studies with regard to alternate sites? 23 I mean, there is land up and down 47 24 that is zoned industrial that can facilitate this. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 43 1 Without professional studies, how can we even 2 consider this intelligently? I mean, we can 3 postulate, we can take -- 4 (Applause. ) 5 MR. SCHNELLER: And I disagree with you 07:55PM 6 with regard to this is what would have to be done 7 for any subdivision. There is not a specific 8 plan, correct? So how do you know what would have 9 to be brought in or not brought in without a 10 specific plan? 07:55PM 11 So I think there's just not adequate 12 evidence, there is certainly not adequate studies, 13 to make any sort of intelligent decision. 14 MR. DAVIDSON: Well, with all -- with 15 all due respect to you, and in fairness to the 07:56PM 16 Planning and Zoning Commission, the Planning and 17 Zoning Commission tonight is dealing with the 18 special use, so a special use under Illinois law 19 is a permitted use as long as we meet certain 20 qualifications, so some of the things that you're 07 : 56PM 21 addressing really have to do with the site 22 development process, but again, we're committed 23 because you folks are here tonight to answer 24 everyone's questions. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 44 1 So as it relates to the traffic 2 count, we have estimated high that on peak days -- 3 MR. SCHNELLER: Are you a traffic 4 expert? 5 MR. DAVIDSON: This is not -- This is 07:56PM 6 not my -- 7 MR. SCHNELLER: Well, I mean, it should 8 be an expert, not just you, and not -- 9 MR. DAVIDSON: My client knows -- It has 10 nothing do with a traffic expert, it has to do 07:56PM 11 with the amount of dirt that we anticipate taking 12 off of Route 47 and having to relocate. That has 13 nothing do with a traffic study. 14 MR. SCHNELLER: That is going to dictate 15 how many trucks are necessary. The amount of dirt 07:57PM 16 is going to dictate the amount of trucks. 17 MR. DAVIDSON: I respectfully disagree 18 with that. There is a disagreement as to -- 1 9 MR. SAVOREE: There will never be 50 20 trucks hauling dirt in the same day. 07 : 57PM 21 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: 49. 22 MR. SAVOREE: It's too close to the 23 dump. It takes five or ten minutes to load the 24 truck, so if it takes five or ten minutes -- DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 45 1 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: But if 2 there is 35 trucks a day or if there is 40 trucks 3 a day, again, without a study -- 4 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: We can't have this. 5 One person at a time. Our stenographer here has 07 :57PM 6 said that she cannot hear. She cannot get this 7 all down. 8 All right. Gentleman over here from 9 D. Construction, state your -- 1 0 MR. SAVOREE: Phil Savoree with D. 07:57PM 11 Construction. Anyway, on the biggest day we're 12 going to haul a hundred loads there. That's the 13 biggest day. Most days are going to be 10, 20 . 14 And you're talking about 5, 000 loads total over 15 the space of two years. It's not going to be just 07:57PM 16 massive trucks hauling down the road. Most of the 17 loads are going to go to the quarry and bring back 18 stone. 19 MR. SCHNELLER: Well, you just said that 20 there is -- excuse me. You just said there is 07 : 58PM 21 going to be no more than 20 to 30, but now you say 22 a hundred. 23 MR. SAVOREE: I didn't say that, okay? 24 MR. SCHNELLER: Okay. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 46 1 MR. SAVOREE: The average day is going 2 to be 20 trucks. The peak day will be a hundred. 3 MR. SCHNELLER: Well, my point is 4 without specific traffic studies by experts, we're 5 all just throwing darts at the wall. 07:58PM 6 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Next 7 question. Judy? 8 MS. GILMOUR: Can I use the microphone? 9 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Sure. 10 MS. GILMOUR: My name is Judy Gilmour 07:58PM 11 and I live in Fox Glen subdivision about 500 feet 12 away from the Evergreen property. 13 I called the DNR, I spoke with the 14 Bureau of Land with my concerns about how the 15 public is going to be protected from possible 07:58PM 16 contaminants going into the soil, and I was told 17 by the DNR that they really have very little 18 regulation over this type of thing, but if I saw 19 something questionable that looked like it was 20 contaminated, I was given the phone number of a 07 : 59PM 21 field inspector that I could call. 22 So that means that me, myself, my 23 neighbors, we'll have to stand out there and watch 24 these trucks unload this soil according to the DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 47 1 DNR, and to me that's not acceptable. They 2 could -- and they could not give me any guarantee 3 that there was going to be any monitoring going 4 on. 5 MS. NOBLE: The DNR, which is the 07:59PM 6 Department of Natural Resources, does not monitor 7 this type of use, it's the IEPA that monitors 8 this, so no, DNR could not give you a guarantee 9 because they are not the agency that monitors 10 that. 07:59PM 11 MS. GILMOUR: I think I misspoke. It 12 was the IEPA. It was the Bureau of Land from the 13 IEPA. 14 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: And not DNR? 15 MS. GILMOUR: No. 08:OOPM 16 MS. NOBLE: The IEPA can't -- in this 17 situation they are hiring a third-party to certify 18 because possibly they want to be objective and not 19 have their own staff monitoring a state project, 20 so that's why they have a third-party contractor, 08:OOPM 21 who is Enmarc, to do the certification. 22 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Tom? 23 MR. GILMOUR: One of many questions, but 24 this is the first one. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 48 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: State your name 2 please, first. 3 MR. GILMOUR: Tom Gilmour, 23 Fox Glen 4 Drive. I'm not like a bike path speaker. I want 5 to read something out of the application itself. 08 : OOPM 6 Under the BA 1416, the IEPA has 7 developed a new set of regulations that are 8 presently under review by the Illinois Pollution 9 Control Board and proposed for adoption on 10 July 21st. 08:01PM 11 Are we trying to move this thing 12 along a little quicker than these new standards 13 take effect? 14 MS. NOBLE: No. As I stated earlier, 15 they are going to adhere to the new standards. 08:01PM 16 Even though they don't go into effect until 17 July 31st, they are going to adhere to those 18 standards now. 19 MR. GILMOUR: Once again, just to 20 restate what was one of the questions, but 08 : 01PM 21 something that might just be problematic, there 22 were formerly, I counted up, seven gas stations 23 throughout the history here, many before a lot of 24 the people moved to this town and know about. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 49 1 There is one that I know of that has 2 an underground full fuel tank that leaches to the 3 top to this day, and it' s going to be brought to 4 the attention of the IEPA, and there are who knows 5 what else. 08 : 01PM 6 And, first of all, I 've got a couple 7 of things that I want to ask here. One, why is 8 this the City's obligation to provide a still 9 clean fill site -- we're going to get to that in a 10 second -- for D. Construction? Their job, their 08:02PM 11 bid. 12 Where was the guarantee from the 13 City that they were obligated or the City to agree 14 to provide or facilitate a clean fill site for 15 them to put this material? 08:02PM 16 Let' s talk about clean fill. I want 17 a good definition of clean fill. I grew up on a 18 farm, I've been in the construction business for 19 45 years, I know a little bit about how 20 developments are developed. 08 : 02PM 21 Now, are we talking about coring out 22 the road right down to the gravel, whatever we may 23 find there? Are we calling that clean fill? 24 When I say black dirt, I 'm talking DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 50 1 about something you plant corn in and it grows . 2 I 'll let you finish. I 'll be back. 3 MS. NOBLE: Okay. I can answer the 4 first question, and I think there is a 5 representative here from Enmarc who can answer the 08 : 03PM 6 second question. 7 The first question, it is not the 8 City's obligation. The City is not providing the 9 site. This is like any other property owner that 10 comes to the City and wants to do some type of 08:03PM 11 development or operation on their land, they want 12 to be in compliance, so the City is not obligated. 13 What we are obligated to do by law 14 is any property owner has every right to come 15 before us and petition for a permit of approval, 08:03PM 16 and that's all that the City is considering. 17 Are you from Enmarc? Are you with 18 Enmarc? 19 MS. VIRGILIO: Yes, I am. Jeanette 20 Virgilio. I want to kind of clear up and maybe 08 : 03PM 21 educate some of the people in the audience, too. 22 There already has been a study done 23 on this highway project. Before IDOT even puts a 24 project up for bid, they go and do a preliminary DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 51 1 environmental site assessment, and they look at 2 all possible sources of contamination along a 3 roadway. 4 Based upon that preliminary 5 environmental assessment, they will then do a 08 : 04PM 6 subsurface investigation at those locations that 7 they think might be a problem, the gas stations, 8 the leaking underground storage tanks. 9 So what they do after they do that 10 site investigation, they determine areas that are 08: 04PM 11 actually impacted, that are contaminated, and by a 12 special provision they say that material has to go 13 to a Subtitle D regulated landfill that's 14 permitted to take that material. 15 The rest of the material is thus 08:04PM 16 determined as clean based upon sampling and what 17 Krysti had indicated as being the TACO standards 18 to stay on residential properties. 19 It has to meet the most stringent 20 standard, which is basically TACO. It' s for 08:04PM 21 residential use. 22 MR. GAWLIK: May I ask a question? 23 MS. VIRGILIO: Sure. 24 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Sir, please. I 'd DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 52 1 like your name first. 2 MR. GAWLIK: I 'm Oly Gawlik. 3 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: I 'm sorry? 4 MR. GAWLIK: I 'm Oly Gawlik. I own the 5 properties adjacent to them on two sides of this 08: 05PM 6 property, and I would like to ask this person -- 7 I 'm sorry, I missed your name -- 8 MS. VIRGILIO: Jeanette. 9 MR. GAWLIK: -- a question. Okay. 10 All the studies that you're doing 08:05PM 11 right now and all the things you mentioned are 12 strictly related to 47 . 13 We just heard from them right now, 14 just a few minutes ago, that this is not limited 15 to 47, so what guarantees do you have when they 08:05PM 16 haul trash from Chicago, from God knows where, and 17 dump it into this site? 18 You are only talking about Route 47 . 19 Do you have assurance you can give me when they 20 haul stuff from other sites? 08 : 05PM 21 This is not something I said. This 22 is something that they mentioned. This is not 23 limited to 47 anymore, as what we were told 24 earlier. It is no longer Route 47 . They can DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 53 1 bring anything they want from anywhere. This is 2 what they said. I didn't say that statement. 3 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: I heard 4 that, too. 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Thank you, sir. 08 : 06PM 6 MR. GAWLIK: Thank you. 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Any comment at all? 8 MS. VIRGILIO: I just want to clarify, I 9 do believe that this gentleman stated that we have 10 more dirt than we need for the Route 47 job, so it 08:06PM 11 won't be coming from other areas, and I do believe 12 that that can even be put in as a special 13 condition, so. . . 14 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Lady over here. 15 MS. WELZ: My name is Lisa Welz . I am 08:06PM 16 from White Oak Estates. There has been some 17 creative talk here tonight, you know, kind of 18 sliding around some things, some misdirection. 19 You have talked a lot about, you 20 know, all these cars going down Fox Road, they're 08 : 06PM 21 already there, and these trucks are not going to 22 be drinking, they're not going to be smoking pot, 23 they're not going to be doing anything they're not 24 supposed to be doing during working hours. You DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 54 1 know, okay, that's great. 2 Fact is, these trucks are a lot 3 wider than a standard car. That's why the concern 4 is for our residents, for our students, for our 5 track team that are running down in the country in 08 : 07PM 6 White Oaks, you know, and their safety. 7 One of our neighbors was hit by a 8 pickup truck, much smaller than a dump truck, and 9 tossed about 30 feet and spent the next eight 10 months in a halo, you know, and this is an adult 08:07PM 11 who was watching the roadway and being careful. 12 You know, kids aren't always as observant as 13 adults are. So that is a very serious, you know, 14 concern of ours. 15 Also, you didn't talk -- you know, 08:07PM 16 this gentleman here talked about, you know, 20, 25 17 trips. Then we get a hundred trips. You know, 18 it's not until you get pinned down, you know, by 19 questions from other people as to is it going to 20 be restricted to Route 47 . You know, that 08 : 07PM 21 question was asked, that question was avoided, got 22 pinned down, and said that it was not being 23 restricted, though it can be a required use, and I 24 actually think that that ought to be something DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 55 1 that our Plan Commission ought to require, is it 2 is strictly from the Route 47 project and no 3 other. 4 I think it' s a very valid question 5 about monitoring. You talked a great deal about 08 : 08PM 6 the IEPA monitoring and so on and so forth. I 7 have two questions on that. One, if you allow it 8 from somewhere else, I can't see how you're going 9 to have any guarantees if the IEPA or anybody else 10 is monitoring it. 08:08PM 11 Secondly, you know, how do you know 12 if those trucks have been monitored? Are you 13 going to require someone to be on-site to see that 14 paperwork to verify that that truck, in fact, has 15 been inspected? 08:08PM 16 You know, you can take -- you know, 17 you can get their sheets and their proof and 18 everything else they provide you, but if you're 19 not there to see that truck or that paperwork for 20 that specific, you know, one being tested, how do 08 : 08PM 21 you know? You know. 22 And I guess I 'm not very trusting, 23 but on something like this, I don't think we 24 can. . . DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 56 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Is there a response 2 to her question? 3 MS. VIRGILIO: Basically there will be 4 an environmental consultant on-site monitoring 5 during the excavation. 08 : 08PM 6 In addition, too, there is an 7 Illinois Department of Transportation resident 8 engineer who oversees the project, and he spends 9 most of his time out in the field overseeing. 10 MS. NOBLE: And most of your Public 08:09PM 11 Works Department and our engineering consultant 12 will also be on-site all day. 13 MR. SAVOREE: And the other question 14 about other jobs, it wasn't avoided or ran around. 15 This -- I have this project. These other jobs 08:09PM 16 that were listed on there, I don't even know if my 17 company has them. They're not my projects, I 18 don't know. 19 MS. WELZ: Oh. That's -- 2 0 MR. SAVOREE: And even if they are our 08 : 09PM 21 projects, they were still let through the State of 22 Illinois and will still be under the same PEZA and 23 everything else, the same environmental. 24 We do -- 99 percent of our work is DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 57 1 with government agencies, IDOT, whoever, Will -- 2 Will County, Kendall County. All of these 3 government agencies by law have to do 4 environmental studies on their job sites. 5 So, but there is enough dirt on this 08 : 1OPM 6 job site, there's not going to be room to bring 7 dirt from -- I mean, this -- 8 MS. WELZ: Then it shouldn't be a 9 problem for you to guarantee in writing that that 10 is the only project that you're going to bring 08:10PM 11 fill in from, if that' s what you're telling me. 12 MR. SAVOREE: Well, I don't own the 13 property, so I -- 14 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: I think the 15 solution -- Excuse me. The solution to that, 08:10PM 16 should the Commission choose, that could be a 17 condition of granting this. 18 MS. WELZ: Okay. And one other thing is 19 what about subcontractors? Are you going to have 20 subcontractors and are you going to make sure that 08:10PM 21 they're following the same regulations? 22 MR. SAVOREE: The subcontractors don't 23 handle excavation. 24 MS. WELZ: Okay. And then one last DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 58 1 question. Being that you are awarded this 2 contract means you had to provide a bid, and those 3 of us that have worked in various industries that 4 the bidding process goes on, I know that that 5 means that you figured out your man hours, you 08 : 10PM 6 know, all your costs and all your profit. 7 Part of that is going to certainly 8 be what are the costs going to be hauling. You 9 know, it's going to be how much are you going to 10 be able to -- how much concrete and so forth are 08: 11PM 11 you going to recycle to earn yourself some money, 12 how much fill are you going to be hauling away, 13 it's going to require so many trucks, so I really 14 believe that you know, you certainly should know, 15 how much fill you have and how many trucks that 08:11PM 16 would require. 17 You've hedged quite a bit on that, 18 and so I really think that you should be able to 19 give, you know, a far better, you know, figure 20 than well, it could be this or it could be that or 08 : 11PM 21 it's going to be this on a high day and it's going 22 to be this on a low day. You know, tell us. 23 You said 5, 000 . Is it 5, 000 loads? 24 Is that what' s in your bid? DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 59 1 MR. SAVOREE: 5, 000 loads is about what 2 I think will fit on that property, so. . . 3 MS. WELZ: But how many loads are you 4 estimating coming from that project? 5 MR. SAVOREE: That's how many I 'm 08 : 11PM 6 estimating. That's just my wild -- scientific 7 wild guess. 8 MS. WELZ: Well, then you might be 9 shortchanging yourself on that bid. 10 MR. SAVOREE: Because, like I said, all 08: 12PM 11 the dirt has to go somewhere, so if that -- if 12 5, 000 loads fills that up, then it' s got to go 13 somewhere else. 14 That property is available to me to 15 use, so I'm planning on putting about 08:12PM 16 5, 000 yards -- 5, 000 loads in there. When that's 17 full, then it's full. 18 MS. WELZ: Okay, I get that, but you -- 1 9 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay, let's not beat 20 this into the ground. 08 : 12PM 21 MS. WELZ: Sorry. 22 MR. SAVOREE: When the trucks are 23 bringing stone back to put in the road or stone to 24 put into the sewer trenches, those trucks are DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 60 1 going to the quarry, so once they are loaded, 2 they're not going to go out of their way to dump 3 there, they're going to go to the quarry and dump 4 at the quarry and come back with the stone. 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. The gentleman 08 : 12PM 6 on the aisle, second to the last row. 7 MR. ROSS: Yeah. My name is George 8 Ross. I live in River's Edge. I 've got maybe 9 three quick questions. Number one, has the 10 property been sold or is it contingent upon you 08:13PM 11 guys getting this permit? 12 MR. DAVIDSON: We have purchased the 13 property. We own the property. 14 MR. ROSS: You own the property. Why 15 aren't you using Pavilion Road? 08:13PM 16 MS. NOBLE: There is a restriction from 17 the County as well as the City to not use Pavilion 18 Road. 19 MR. ROSS: Why? 20 MS. NOBLE: Because it' s not designed 08 : 13PM 21 for that type of weight of traffic. 22 MR. ROSS: He just said 5, 000 loads in 23 this project, that's done. That's 10, 000 trips 24 back and forth on Fox. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 61 1 Every time we've ever had anybody 2 talk to us about a dump, they were trying to tell 3 us how stupid we were, that we're going to make it 4 so beautiful, you guys ought to be paying us to 5 come in here and make a dump. 08 : 13PM 6 (Applause. ) 7 MR. ROSS: This is a dump and let' s not 8 forget it. 9 MS. NOBLE: Just a point of 10 clarification and probably reiteration, this is 08: 14PM 11 the same tantamount to any site preparation that 12 was done for any residential development here, and 13 had they been in the process of building a home, 14 the same amount of traffic that you would 15 experience for this would be happening as well. 08:14PM 16 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: How about the 17 gentleman in the back row with a blue shirt and a 18 hat on? Well, there is two blue shirts . Either 19 one. 20 MR. JOHNSON: Harold Johnson, T.J. 08:14PM 21 Johnson, 27 Ivy Drive, Yorkville, Illinois. I am 22 looking at a document that was presented to the 23 City of Yorkville. Number 7 in this document, 24 Page 44, says there does a floodplain exist on the DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 62 1 subject property, and it says yes. 2 MS. NOBLE: In their application, their 3 original application, we have confirmation 4 actually, and I have a FIRM map, which is issued 5 by the -- by FEMA, which shows there is no 08 : 15PM 6 floodplain on this property. 7 MR. SCHULTZ: Just to follow that up, 8 excuse me, I filled out that application and I 9 mistakenly put there is a floodplain on this 10 application. 08:15PM 11 I followed the previous application 12 that was submitted for Evergreen Farms for this 13 concept plan, so I take credit. I'm sorry for 14 that. That was my mistake. And then I redid my 15 research and my homework and came up with what I 08:15PM 16 came up with. 17 MR. JOHNSON: Because I represent a 18 farming aspect that I am concerned about. This is 19 a broader question. It seems to me that there is 20 an ongoing assault to take more and more farmland 08 : 15PM 21 out of production. We have a hungry world. We 22 have India, China, demanding more and more protein 23 in their diets, and here we are, another farm 24 gone. I don't like that. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 63 1 Another one is how -- if this is 2 clean fill dirt, what are you doing with the 3 asphalt and the concrete? 4 MR. DAVIDSON: With respect to the 5 farming question, we're actually -- we actually 08 : 16PM 6 would be putting this back into production. 7 MR. JOHNSON: After two years . Still a 8 two-year lapse. The other one is where are you 9 placing your asphalt and your concrete? 10 MR. SAVOREE: That will be recycled. 08:16PM 11 MR. JOHNSON: There is a huge wall that 12 has to be taken down. Where is all that going? 13 MR. SAVOREE: I'll let the folks at -- 14 that will all be recycled. 15 MR. JOHNSON: It will not be dumped on 08:16PM 16 the property? 17 MR. GILMOUR: Stored there. 18 MR. JOHNSON: Okay. And so this is 19 not -- you are not dumping anything on the 20 property? 08:17PM 21 MR. DAVIDSON: Just clean fill. 22 MR. JOHNSON: Okay, but that's dumping. 23 All right. 24 MR. DAVIDSON: Actually, just to DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 64 1 clarify, since you asked me the question, let me 2 answer your question. 3 MR. JOHNSON: Yes, please do. 4 MR. DAVIDSON: We intend to comply with 5 all the requirements for a special use, and the R2 08 : 17PM 6 residential zoning adopts the R1, and under Rl the 7 filling and excavating of R1 land is specifically 8 a special use, so, therefore, if we meet the 9 criteria of a special use, the Planning and Zoning 10 Commission is obligated to give a favorable 08:17PM 11 recommendation. 12 MR. JOHNSON: So this is only clean fill 13 dirt? 14 MR. DAVIDSON: That's correct. 15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: All right. Now the 08:17PM 16 other gentleman in the back row, go ahead. The 17 one in the doorway. What is your name, sir? 18 MR. MILLER: Jim Miller. I 've got a 19 question. Is that dirt not going to be any higher 20 than street level or grade level that you're 08 : 18PM 21 bringing in there? 22 MR. DAVIDSON: Yeah, I 'm the lawyer, so 23 I 'll let the engineer take care of that one. 24 MR. SCHULTZ: Yeah, the elevations are DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 65 1 still to be determined, and that' s where the site 2 development permit will come in, but there is no 3 intention from my end to raise that higher than 4 the road. It would -- It would be out of place. 5 MR. MILLER: Then I 've got another 08 : 18PM 6 question. 7 MR. SCHULTZ: I mean, the elevation 8 difference -- and I do have an existing conditions 9 map that I did bring with me. I believe that it's 10 somewhere like three to four feet. 08: 18PM 11 MR. MILLER: Then I've got one more 12 question. Will you put a statement in your 13 contract with the village here that you will pay a 14 fine for every day this is over two years? 15 MR. SCHULTZ: I don't have those 08:18PM 16 obligations with the City. 17 MR. MILLER: I 've got one more question. 18 How much is the village getting out of this? How 19 much are you paying the village for this? 20 MR. SCHULTZ: I'm just the engineer. 08 : 19PM 21 I 22 MR. DAVIDSON: We -- 2 3 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: My understanding is 24 it's the filing fee for the permit. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 66 1 MR. MILLER: I can understand your -- 2 You seem to be swayed one way or another. You 3 don't seem to be open to this. You seem to be 4 already -- you already know what your answer is. 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Nobody knows what, 08:19PM 6 sir? I don't understand. 7 MR. MILLER: You've already decided what 8 you are going to do. 9 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: No, we haven't. 10 MR. MILLER: That's what it sounds like 08:19PM 11 to me. 12 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: We're trying to get 13 your questions answered, your concerns right here. 14 We will discuss this and vote on it and send our 15 recommendation to the Council, and to accuse us of 08:19PM 16 something else is wrong. 17 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: How come 18 we can't vote on it? 19 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: How about the 20 gentleman in the corner over here? 08:20PM 21 MR. ALLEN: Good evening. My name is 22 Dervin Allen of 12 Fox Glen Circle. I've heard 23 this gentleman make statements that the 24 existing -- you would do this to a site that a DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 67 1 subdivision was going to be built. 2 This is true, but when they do that, 3 they put roads in, they put drainage in, and they 4 control it. 5 He referred to the railroad tracks. 08 :20PM 6 The railroad tracks acts like a dam. There' s not 7 enough drainage underneath the tracks, so the land 8 that you're going to fill, that water has to go 9 somewhere, and the pipes that are underneath the 10 tracks are not big enough to handle the water now. 08:20PM 11 This was brought -- I recognize a 12 few faces and some I don't. When this was all -- 13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Your poster looks 14 familiar, too. 15 MR. ALLEN: Yes. I didn't change it. 08:21PM 16 Okay. I was glad I kept it. 17 Where this is showing you, just to 18 show a few people here, you can pass it around, 19 it's reference to this -- let's see. This is 20 Evergreen Farms. 08 :21PM 21 It's reference to -- this is the 22 water here, this is the other one here, it doesn't 23 show it any further. It winds around, comes 24 behind these houses, and there is another pipe DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 68 1 here. Okay? Neither one of these pipes can 2 handle the water. 3 I have a large pipe that I 4 researched before this and I was told from the 5 University of Illinois that speculation on this is 08 :21PM 6 that -- that is on the back of my property. 7 Hardly no water goes through it. It's high. 8 Their guess was it was for a cattle crossing years 9 ago when that was a dairy farm so the cattle could 10 get to the river. 08:22PM 11 Water right now runs from the forest 12 preserve all the way along the railroad tracks and 13 comes down. That's the only thing that goes to 14 that pipe. There is no drainage. Okay? 15 And this is something -- just to 08:22PM 16 prove this is the date, you can go back and Google 17 it, you can check the rainfall on it. This was 18 pulled up. From this existing house that is right 19 here on the corner of the subdivision, this is the 20 water coming out of here. 08 :22PM 21 You can see this green here in the 22 field, everything else is brown. This land all 23 has springs in it, too, okay? Now you're going to 24 come in and cover up springs. There is no DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 69 1 drainage put in. I 'm just concerned where the 2 water goes. Okay? 3 You can see that it was running 4 across Fox Glen here. This is all the way up. 5 They actually -- the County came out and shut down 08 :22PM 6 Fox Road that day. This was not a springtime 7 storm that the ground was just thawing, it was 8 just one of those rains, okay? 9 The other thing we've been referring 10 to is truck loads, truck loads, truck loads. How 08:23PM 11 many yards will be going out there? I recommend 12 to this committee if you do pass this along that 13 you put a limit on the yards of dirt. I mean, 14 somebody's got to have the numbers. And I would 15 recommend to the committee that they specialize 08:23PM 16 that it just comes from Route 47 . That's two of 17 my main recommendations. 18 And really I recommend not fill this 19 land because the water has to go somewhere. They 20 can't give you the heights, they can't give you 08 :23PM 21 the -- 22 MR. GILMOUR: 150-foot elevation. 23 MR. ALLEN: They cannot give you the 24 height even, how high they're going to fill it in DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 70 1 reference to the road. It sounds like they don't 2 have it thought -- well planned yet. And this is 3 what I got from the University of Illinois before. 4 Thanks, Tom. 5 And your highest point in your 08 :23PM 6 county roughly is High Point Road and Route 47, 7 your lowest is the Fox River, the way the bird 8 flies. 9 Take how big your county is; that's 10 a very short distance for water to run. Again, 08:24PM 11 the railroad tracks does not have ample, and they 12 won't put anything else underneath them. We can't 13 even keep the train on the tracks. 14 So did you even consider that? Do 15 they even consider that, putting -- There are no 08:24PM 16 retention ponds in here. When they come and we 17 agreed it went to an R2 zoning and everything, if 18 you go back and look at the plots and everything, 19 there were ponds all put in, all different ponds 20 put along the south end of this property to retain 08:24PM 21 that water on both these subdivisions that they 22 have plotted there, and that's probably about -- 2 3 MR. WELZ: By law you can't put. . . 24 MR. ALLEN: And there was studies done DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 71 1 on it then, too. 2 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Gentleman 3 nearest the doors with the glasses I believe. 4 Yes. 5 MR. MOORE: Keith Moore. I am at 08 :25PM 6 Pavilion Heights. I live on the corner of Chally 7 and Pavilion. You know, this floodplain, the 8 entire Pavilion Road from our house north flooded 9 out last spring. I mean, we're talking it almost 10 shut down parts of Pavilion Road. 08:25PM 11 This property abuts Pavilion Creek. 12 It comes right down through there. If they're not 13 going to address drainage from Pavilion Creek and 14 improve this, exactly what he just said, we're 15 going to be flooded out like crazy up in Pavilion 08:25PM 16 Heights. 17 The other part that you're talking 18 about is a special use permit. If this was going 19 to be a subdivision, we'd have the full PUD, 20 streets, sewers, everything going in to handle it. 08 :25PM 21 Right now we're dumping 5, 000 truck 22 loads, estimate, of dirt on a piece of property 23 with no infrastructure going in. That's why it' s 24 a special use permit. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 72 1 It doesn't -- We're putting the cart 2 before the horse here. It doesn't make a lot of 3 sense. 4 (Applause. ) 5 MR. SCHULTZ: Just to interject just a 08 :26PM 6 second, I want to talk just real briefly about 7 the drainage. I am familiar with those photos. 8 We are talking about two different drainage 9 divides. 10 MR. GILMOUR: No. 08:26PM 11 MR. SCHULTZ: Fox -- Yes, we are. 12 MR. GILMOUR: It heads in that 13 direction, I know better, and -- 14 MR. SCHULTZ: Okay. 15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Let the gentleman 08:26PM 16 state his facts, please. 17 MR. SCHULTZ: There is different 18 drainage divides. There is a road -- or a bridge 19 trellis where our -- this property is tributary 20 to. 08 :26PM 21 He is referring to behind Fox Glen 22 where Silver Fox drains down this corridor into 23 this, and that will be a process of the 24 engineering. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 73 1 Why we haven't given you details 2 that you are looking for, of elevations, how much 3 fill, that is the next step. This is a process. 4 Special use is our first step in this process. 5 The next process is to get to the final 08 :26PM 6 engineering. 7 And we are taking this property 8 essentially and leaving it in its same current 9 state, it' s going to be farmed, so the drainage 10 run-off is the same as it is in existing. 08:27PM 11 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: No, it' s 12 not. 13 MR. MOORE: You just said you're putting 14 5, 000 truck loads of dirt into a non-PUD 15 subdivision. Nothing -- None of the 08:27PM 16 infrastructure is there. We are putting this dirt 17 in with no infrastructure. It' s not the same 18 thing. You're raising the dirt level of this 19 entire property. That's what we're here for. 20 If we're leaving it the same, then 08 :27PM 21 we wouldn't need to be here, there would be no 22 special use permit before the Plan Commission, so 23 we're not leaving it the same. 24 Yes, I am a little bit passionate DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 74 1 about it because we flood over where we're at. 2 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Understood. 3 Understood. Okay. At this time I 'm going to ask 4 if there is any new issues that we have not talked 5 about. 08 :27PM 6 We've talked about a whole lot of 7 things. I don't want to hear about flooding and 8 truck loads. We have all talked about that. You 9 may not believe the answers that you've heard, but 10 that's up to you individually. 08:27PM 11 Now, is there something else to 12 bring up? Gentleman right back here under the 13 clock. 14 MR. HETTINGER: My name is Nick 15 Hettinger from Pavilion Heights. I had a bunch of 08:27PM 16 questions; I won't ask those because they may be 17 repeats. 18 Would you consider as the council 19 here putting this dirt on the old Countryside 20 Center area -- 08 :28PM 21 (Applause. ) 22 MR. HETTINGER: -- and leave it there 23 rather than here? You are in a position where you 24 can say no special permit, find another place. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 75 1 Maybe Countryside Center. Isn't doing anything 2 else for us. 3 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: But 4 they've already bought the land. 5 MR. HETTINGER: I guess that' s all I 'm 08 :28PM 6 going to ask. 7 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Is that your 8 question? I don't know the answer to that. Right 9 here in front. 10 MR. SCOTT: Hi. My name is Randy Scott. 08:28PM 11 I live in Pavilion Heights. A question I have is 12 we were talking about the IEPA tonight. We all 13 know the State of Illinois is broke, okay? 14 They're short of help. Everybody is short of 15 help. I'm short of help. I 'm short of money and 08:29PM 16 everything else. 17 Here's the deal. IEPA cannot 18 monitor or control yard waste down 71; you're 19 talking about them hiring another entity to come 20 in and test this soil and all of this stuff. 08 :29PM 21 If they can't monitor that, if they 22 don't have enough staff, who is the -- who is the 23 other party that we're going to hire here to 24 monitor this stuff that we're hauling away from 47 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 76 1 to make sure it's not contaminated? 2 MS. NOBLE: We're not hiring. The State 3 of Illinois has already engaged Enmarc to do that. 4 MR. SCOTT: Well, I heard somebody say 5 something about a third-party. 08 :29PM 6 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: That is -- 7 MS. NOBLE: That is -- Enmarc is the 8 third-party consultant. 9 MR. SCOTT: I 'm sorry? 10 MS. NOBLE: Enmarc is the third-party 08:29PM 11 consultant that IDOT has hired. The City has not 12 hired anyone. 13 MR. SCOTT: They are doing the 14 environmental on this, so then the IEPA is going 15 to be watching over them? Or how does that work? 08:30PM 16 MS. NOBLE: They are a third-party 17 independent environmental engineer, and their 18 role, because IDOT and IEPA are both state 19 agencies, is to be an objective third-party entity 20 to monitor the soil contaminants. That's their 08:30PM 21 role. 22 Not part of the City's staff and we 23 have nothing to do with that. That's part of the 24 IDOT project. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 77 1 MR. SCOTT: Okay. Well, my hope and 2 concern is that -- you know, that they'll have 3 enough staff, that they'll do the proper testing 4 and, you know, look at this stuff really good 5 because, like I say, we can't even monitor 08 : 30PM 6 composting, how are we going to monitor this? 7 Thank you. 8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Gentleman in the 9 doorway with a black shirt, I believe you had your 10 hand up. 08:30PM 11 MR. MALOHN: Yeah. My name is Paul 12 Malohn and I live in Pavilion Heights. I have two 13 comments here, and I know you people are all 14 talking about Fox Road construction. What's going 15 to stop them from going around on 71 and coming 08:31PM 16 down Pavilion Road, which can't handle the trucks 17 that go up and down it now? 18 Menards' trucks go up and down there 19 as a cut-off rather than going through Yorkville, 20 so we -- and that doesn't get monitored, so what's 08 : 31PM 21 going to say they're not going to go around and 22 tear that road up worse than it already is? 23 That's one question I 've got. 24 And the other one -- and I know you DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 78 1 don't want to hear about floods, but I lived there 2 in ' 78 and we lived through a big flood, and the 3 main reason was that creek got plugged up down 4 there, and if they start changing the grade of 5 that property at -- on Pavilion Road right there 08 : 31PM 6 on that corner down there by Fox Road, that water 7 is still -- it' s going to back up into that Timber 8 Creek and there's going to be some real problems, 9 and I think that if you guys go ahead and do this, 10 I think that everyone that there lives out there 08:31PM 11 should get an attorney and sue you for floodplains 12 because that is a floodplain out there. Go out 13 there when it rains . You'll see it. 14 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay, enough -- 15 MR. MALOHN: That's my only comment. 08:32PM 16 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Enough on that. 17 Gentleman standing up. Make it short, please. 18 MR. GAWLIK: This is a public hearing 19 and I'm here to find answers. Actually I came 20 here to really find answers. 08 : 32PM 21 I knew it when I bought this land. 22 This is not the first time we've been through 23 this. As you know, this area has been attracting 24 all sort of things. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 79 1 We just finished, in fact, the dump 2 that they were going to put on 71 within two miles 3 of us; then before that we had country western 4 that they were going to do, there was going to be 5 noise and all sort of stuff. 08 : 32PM 6 So people moved out here because 7 they wanted to live in the country, because of 8 what Yorkville offers. I didn't -- I didn't come 9 here from Aurora to find out myself that I 'm going 10 to be living right next to a construction site. 08:33PM 11 Okay? 12 So I 'm not going to dwell on this 13 idea, I just want to make a few points and I 'll 14 try to make it very short. 15 First thing is, you know, I ask 08:33PM 16 myself what's the point in having zoning laws if 17 every time we have something that somebody wants 18 to do in this area, they can just come in here and 19 walk through and say oh, we just need new zoning, 20 can you please give us new zoning. What's the 08 : 33PM 21 point? 22 (Applause. ) 23 MR. GAWLIK: When I tried to build on 24 this property, my attorney says go find out what DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 80 1 zonings do they have around you. This will 2 determine what' s going to happen. 3 It was purely agricultural. Then it 4 got changed to residential, which is fine. 5 Residential, there is nothing wrong with it. I 08 : 33PM 6 don't think anyone here is against any major 7 thing. We are just concerned about basic things. 8 Our well. Let's think about our 9 well issue because I want to revisit that. What I 10 heard today -- and you all are witness to this -- 08:34PM 11 he didn't say that it' s only limited to 47 . 12 He didn't say it will never be 13 contaminated. He said if it is, if it did get 14 contaminated, we will try to contain it. He 15 didn't say that it will never be contaminated. 08:34PM 16 If you disagree with me, will the 17 City of Yorkville then guarantee me? I am right 18 next to the property. I 'm not a few hundred feet, 19 I 'm right next to it on both sides. My well is 20 probably within 50 feet away. 08:34PM 21 So will the City of Yorkville 22 guarantee me that my well will not be 23 contaminated? Because when and if it does get 24 contaminated, you can bet that I will sue not only DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 81 1 the City of Yorkville, I will sue everyone that's 2 involved because this is my home, this is my life. 3 So with that, this is the well issue. 4 Back to the flood, okay? How many 5 people lived here and can see that there are -- at 08 : 35PM 6 least I witnessed it once where Pavilion Road 7 itself, I could not drive on it because it was 8 flooded completely, and the site that they are 9 talking about was completely under water, how many 10 of you saw that? 08:35PM 11 Okay. So my question to you is if 12 it's not in the floodplain, why isn't it in the 13 floodplain? 14 MS. NOBLE: We don't determine that. 15 MR. GAWLIK: Okay. Who determines that? 08:35PM 16 MS. NOBLE: The federal government 17 determines that. 18 MR. GAWLIK: Okay. Then we have to talk 19 to the federal government because this really 20 should be in the floodplain. We have seen it -- 08 : 35PM 21 As you saw from this, we have seen it completely 22 under water. This is where the water flows. It 23 flows from Pavilion Heights, comes down all the 24 way. This is the lowest point in this whole area. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 82 1 So it is not just me saying it, 2 everyone here saw it, so I don't care what the 3 federal government says. If their maps are wrong, 4 then we can work to fix this problem. But I 5 wanted you to hear that it does get flooded, it is 08 : 36PM 6 under water, I have seen it under water, and I 7 wish I had a picture of it. 8 In fact, that day it was so much 9 under water I could not drive on Pavilion Road and 10 I had to call to work and say I can't get out of 08:36PM 11 my house and they laugh at me because they 12 couldn't believe that there is so much water out 13 there on the street that I can't drive. 14 So to settle the flood -- the flood 15 issue, okay, I think we can go back, we can work 08:36PM 16 with the government, the federal government, to 17 fix this issue because honestly -- and again, I'm 18 not just saying that, you saw the counts here, it 19 is under water. 20 So when you bring all this dirt -- 08 : 36PM 21 okay, right now you have all this space -- it's 22 like a city pool. You have all this water flowing 23 all the way from Pavilion Heights all the way down 24 and this is your pool. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 83 1 Now you're going to go and fill it 2 up with no drainage. None whatsoever. Where is 3 the water do you think going to go? 4 Well, guess what? It's going to 5 flood Pavilion Heights, and if Pavilion Heights 08 : 37PM 6 gets flooded, that means my house is completely 7 under water, okay? 8 And I will be very honest with you. 9 When I built my house, I had neighbors come to me 10 and tell me, hey, make sure you raise -- you raise 08:37PM 11 your house because this area does get flooded. 12 okay? 13 But this issue of flooding, it' s 14 really a serious issue, and when we bring 5, 000 15 trucks, whatever, to dump it there, you are 08:37PM 16 basically filling this pool right now that's 17 basically consuming this water when it rains. 18 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: I don't think 19 anybody doubts what you are saying is true. 20 That's not the issue. 08 : 37PM 21 MR. GAWLIK: Okay. That' s number one. 22 Trucks . Related to the trucks -- 2 3 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Is this -- excuse 24 me. Is this something new related to trucks? DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 84 1 MR. GAWLIK: Well, I 'm trying to give 2 you the facts. I 'm trying to give you the facts 3 and summarize what's being said here, okay, 4 because I came to find facts . I came to find out 5 what's ahead of you, what's being proposed to you. 08 : 37PM 6 Okay? 7 And what I see here is I see that we 8 have absolutely no plans, none whatsoever, as to 9 what's going on. We look at the trucks, we heard 10 20 trucks, no more than 20 trucks a day; then 08:38PM 11 within their own company they said it's a hundred 12 trucks now, and they don't know. This is only 13 from his company, okay? So with that, I'm going 14 to close on that one for the trucks issue. Okay. 15 Traffic, okay? What we heard today 08:38PM 16 is that they will obey and follow all the 17 guidelines for the weight and that will determine 18 how much each truck will carry. 19 Well, what that says is that, okay, 20 they have to -- they have certain dumps that they 08 : 38PM 21 have to do, okay, so if you limit the number of 22 pounds, whatever, they're going to load per truck, 23 all that means is they're just going to increase 24 the number of trucks. That does not answer the DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 85 1 question. The question is how are you dealing 2 with the traffic on Fox Road. 3 Today, to be honest with you, Fox 4 Road can't handle the traffic today, okay? And if 5 you want to see Pavilion Road, I wish I brought 08 : 39PM 6 you pictures of Pavilion Road. 7 Last week I almost had an accident. 8 You know why I almost had an accident? Because 9 there's so many potholes on Pavilion Road that I 10 have to actually go and get in the side lane, and 08:39PM 11 that's another thing I want to bring to the City 12 Council at some different meeting, is that 13 Pavilion Road is a disaster today. 14 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: That' s not in the 15 city, sir. 08:39PM 16 MR. GAWLIK: Okay. Well, yes, it is . 17 It is within the city. 18 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Portions of it? 19 Okay. 20 MR. GAWLIK: It was taken over by the 08 : 39PM 21 City once they took the subdivisions, okay? 22 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: I 'm wrong. I 'm 23 wrong. 24 MR. GAWLIK: And right now, it' s full DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 86 1 with potholes today. So the idea of more traffic 2 is coming in and more -- it can't handle it today. 3 Okay? 4 If we're saying that -- if there is 5 no contamination, it's all clean fill, we still 08 : 39PM 6 don't -- I don't have -- Does the City have a 7 definition of what clean fill is? 8 MS. NOBLE: The state does . The IEPA. 9 MR. GAWLIK: Okay. So if it' s all clean 10 fill like the gentleman said, it' s all great, it' s 08:40PM 11 all wonderful, we should be paying them money to 12 do this, why can't the City of Yorkville and 13 themselves give me a guarantee that my well will 14 not be contaminated? 15 If it's all so great, why can't you 08:40PM 16 give me guarantee? I 'm asking. This is -- this 17 is a public hearing for you -- for me to ask the 18 question and for you to answer. 19 MS. NOBLE: That is nothing that I can 20 answer. That could be an act of God. It' s 08:40PM 21 nothing that any individual can guarantee. 22 MR. GAWLIK: No, it's not an act of God 23 because I can measure it today and I can measure 24 it once they start the construction, and I can DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 87 1 tell you, I don't really care about what the EPA 2 says because in my opinion, I know what the EPA -- 3 the EPA can't even handle little things, let alone 4 handle something, you know, 200 miles away, so I 5 don't personally -- you know, all these guarantees 08 : 40PM 6 about EPA and all that, they mean nothing to me, 7 okay? 8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: What is your point? 9 MR. GAWLIK: My point is you have no 10 guarantees. You're telling us it's a clean fill, 08: 41PM 11 but yet at the same time you cannot give me 12 guarantee that you're not going to poison my well, 13 and I'm right next to it. I 'm not a hundred feet 14 away, I'm right next to it. 15 Can you give me guarantee? Because 08:41PM 16 this is the question that I'm going to give you, 17 when I do my test and it shows major differences 18 between what I had before and what I have now, 19 these are the questions that I'm going to be 20 asking you in front of a judge. I am not shy 08 : 41PM 21 about it. I can tell you that right now. 22 MS. NOBLE: Well, since the City is not 23 doing the work and it' s not our project, we can 24 guarantee that we won't be the ones contaminating, DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 88 1 if there is. We're not -- the City is not 2 involved in this project. It's set for the 3 special use. 4 MR. GAWLIK: Okay. When we get there, 5 we'll deal with it. Right now my job is to pose 08 : 41PM 6 the question to you because by posing the question 7 to you, if something does happen and things do go 8 wrong, then I can go to a judge and say, Your 9 Honor, on this day I did tell them, I warned them, 10 and they decided to ignore me and go ahead with it 08:42PM 11 anyway. 12 I'm not saying it' s going to happen, 13 I 'm not saying you guys are going to ignore me. I 14 think you guys in the past have done a fantastic 15 job. I know you had to fight a big battle to get 08:42PM 16 rid of the dump that they were planning on 71, 17 so -- 1 8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Sir, it's getting 19 late. 20 MR. GAWLIK: Okay. 08:42PM 21 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: I think we have 22 answered your questions. Let's move on to 23 something else. 24 MR. GAWLIK: Okay. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 89 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Something else you 2 have that we have not talked about in the past. 3 MR. GAWLIK: Okay. The other thing, 4 too, is that it just seems like in general every 5 question we asked tonight, we didn't get any clear 08 : 42PM 6 answer. 7 First we talked about it's two years 8 project, okay? Then it became two years plus. We 9 don't know what that plus is . We have no 10 engineering track, okay? We have no idea what the 08:42PM 11 elevation is going to be. We have no plans for 12 drainage. Nothing. 13 So, I mean, I guess one thing I 14 don't understand is for the traffic light that we 15 want to put in the City of Yorkville, right, we go 08:43PM 16 and we do a city engineering traffic study, and 17 here we are, we've got 5, 000 loads, whatever 18 they're going to run, a hundred trucks per day, 19 and no engineering traffic needed? How is that 20 possible? 08 : 43PM 21 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. These are 22 things that we're going to take into consideration 23 if we get to that point. 24 MR. GAWLIK: Okay. That' s all I have. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 90 1 Thank you. 2 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Way back in the 3 corner. Yes, sir. 4 MR. LAUWERS: Barry Lauwers. I live on 5 Pavilion Road. 08 : 43PM 6 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Barry, hold on. You 7 are next. 8 MR. LAUWERS: Okay. 9 MR. DUSELL: My name is Fred Dusell. 10 I 'm a Yorkville city resident. Before I get 08:43PM 11 started, I never heard tonight, are these drivers 12 going to be paid by the load or by the hour? 13 MR. SAVOREE: Hour. 14 MR. DUSELL: By the hour? Okay. I was 15 hoping to come here tonight and get assurances 08:43PM 16 that I 'd be more comfortable with what's going on 17 with this project. I am leaving here tonight more 18 concerns than I came in with. It's unfortunate. 19 (Applause. ) 20 MR. DUSELL: The discrepancies between 08:44PM 21 the applicant's representatives just are way out 22 of bounds. They came very ill prepared. I am 23 very concerned with the way this came about. 24 I was in business for ten years DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 91 1 myself. When I went out and purchased things for 2 our business, we had pretty good assurance that 3 what we were purchasing was going to bring a 4 profit to us. 5 How this came about and putting this 08 : 44PM 6 kind of money down on a property without having a 7 contingency that this property is going to be used 8 for that purpose makes things look kind of 9 underhanded. I want to know about -- 10 (Applause. ) 08: 44PM 11 MR. DUSELL: That's -- that's about it. 12 I 'd like to get some good answers on how this came 13 about. 14 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Barry? 15 MR. LAUWERS: Yeah, Barry Lauwers. I've 08:44PM 16 lived out on Pavilion Road since 1974, I 've been 17 through several floods, but I'll tell you this 18 much. As anybody can tell you that lived in 19 Pavilion Heights, and my neighbor George, it 20 floods, comes clear up my driveway about 150 feet, 08: 45PM 21 but when it gets down to Fox Road, that's where 22 all the problem is. 23 We've got beaver dams, we have 24 trees, we have brush, we have washers and dryers DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 92 1 and junk thrown in there, and it flooded. Once it 2 got cleaned out, it ran a lot better. 3 Across the road they've got a ditch 4 that runs down there clear to the river, and 5 16 inches of rain we got in that hour, everybody 08:45PM 6 ought to remember that -- 7 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Yep. 8 MR. LAUWERS: -- and I 'll tell you what, 9 the water went down that ditch, and Tyson's didn't 10 stay wet hardly at all. I mean, it had some ponds 08:45PM 11 from 16 inches, but it dried up. And I don't 12 think you have to worry about floodplain out 13 there. 14 I don't know about what it's going 15 to do about the wells; I 'm not going to argue 08:45PM 16 that. 17 One other thing, they talked about 18 traffic. Okay. I drive that road every day. I 19 don't see a bunch of kids walking on the road 20 except out there hiking, and you've got to be an 08 : 46PM 21 idiot to walk on Fox Road anyway because of the 22 traffic. 23 The track team, I got so mad, I 24 called the coach a few years ago. I came out of DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 93 1 town -- The town just built a fancy track right 2 out here in back for the kids to run on, and all 3 of a sudden I 'm coming up the hill at White Oaks 4 farm, the sun's in my face, and I pretty near 5 wiped out the track team, and I was not a happy 08 : 46PM 6 camper. 7 If they want to run, let them run on 8 the track team -- on the track out here. For two 9 years if people can't hike around the subdivision 10 and do that kind of thing and have a bicycle 08:46PM 11 that's got a flag and a yellow back on the rider, 12 then they're going to get hit, but don't come with 13 all this traffic business. So that's all I can 14 say. 15 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Ron? For the 08:46PM 16 record, can we have your name? 17 MR. MORRIS: I 'm sorry. Ron Morris. 18 Are the trucks going each -- truck going to be 19 weighed or are they just going to randomly select? 20 And the other thing is, I 'm quite 08 : 47PM 21 concerned about trying to travel on Fox Road. 22 Sometimes it' s almost impossible to get out. It's 23 a speed record through there. We've had guys at 24 90 miles an hour coming into town. We've had a DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 94 1 couple guys that wrapped their trees -- or their 2 car around the tree. One moved a house off its 3 foundation. 4 Is the City going to lower the speed 5 limit to, say, 20 miles an hour, get a couple 08 : 47PM 6 radar cameras so that they can take pictures of 7 anybody speeding? 8 I find it hard to believe that a 9 trucker is going to follow the speed limit. 10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. I will take 08:47PM 11 about two more questions and then we're going to 12 adjourn. Ma'am, you haven't had a turn yet. Yes. 13 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: My 14 question is for D. Construction. Isn't it true 15 that when you get a commercial loan that you have 08:47PM 16 to do a plain test -- a floodplain test? 17 MR. SAVOREE: Asking the wrong person. 18 I build roads. 19 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: I 'm sorry, what -- 2 0 Can you restate that? I didn't quite understand. 08 : 48PM 21 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Isn't it 22 true when you get a commercial loan that it has to 23 pass a floodplain test? 24 MR. DAVIDSON: No. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 95 1 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: I believe 2 it is. 3 MR. DAVIDSON: Well, at this point I 'm 4 an involuntarily retired commercial development 5 attorney because there is no commercial 08 : 48PM 6 development, but having done a lot of commercial 7 development projects across the state of Illinois, 8 including projects here in Yorkville, the 9 Walgreens out there on 47 and 126, it's not a 10 requirement, I can tell you that. It's all going 08: 48PM 11 to be based on what the bank's requirements are to 12 make the loan. 13 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Is that 14 new? Did it change? Because it used to be a 15 requirement. 08:48PM 16 MR. DAVIDSON: I -- 17 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Did you 18 finance or was it cash? 19 MR. DAVIDSON: I 'm 38 years old, I 've 20 been practicing law for 15 years; it's never been 08 : 48PM 21 a requirement since I have practiced law. My 22 partner is 80, maybe it was at some point, but I 23 can speak to the last 15 years. 24 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Was the DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 96 1 property financed or did they pay cash? 2 MR. DAVIDSON: I was in Puerto Rico when 3 it closed, so what -- Did you pay cash? Probably. 4 Probably paid cash. 5 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: All 08 : 49PM 6 right. That' s why. That's exactly why you didn't 7 have to do that, because you paid cash. 8 MR. DAVIDSON: Well, on commercial 9 loans, I represent a lot of financial 10 institutions -- 08:49PM 11 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: That' s 12 it. You answered my questions . 13 MR. DAVIDSON: Our law firm represents 14 financial institutions in Illinois, and it is not 15 a requirement for a commercial loan. 08:49PM 16 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: All right. I 'm 17 going to take one more question. You are all 18 pointing to one. Which one is it? 19 MR. ZERANTE: Tom Zerante, River's Edge. 20 I have copies of Plan Council notes from 08:49PM 21 February 23rd, and I believe they were done by 22 Krysti Noble. 23 The packet stated Mr. Schultz, whom 24 I believe we met earlier, mentioned that they will DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 97 1 be reaching out to the area residents to hold a 2 meeting to explain the proposed temporary use and 3 answer questions prior to the Plan Commission 4 public hearing. This would primarily include the 5 Fox Glen residents. Mr. Dhuse mentioned they 08 :50PM 6 should reach out to the owner of the property to 7 the west, Mr. Sykes (phonetic) , Evergreen Farm. 8 Miss Noble also encouraged contacting the 9 residents of River' s Edge, as well as residents of 10 White Oak subdivision. 08:50PM 11 Myself and other dedicated 12 individuals put out the flyer that most of you 13 saw. Did anybody hear from Mr. Schultz prior to 14 this meeting? 15 THE AUDIENCE: No. 08:50PM 16 MR. ZERANTE: What kind of turnout have 17 we had? 18 THE AUDIENCE: None. 19 MR. ZERANTE: None? Mr. Schultz, did 20 that fall off your things to do list? 08:50PM 21 MR. SCHULTZ: No, it didn't. By public 22 notice, I involved within 500 feet of this 23 property. I went out to Fox Glen subdivision and 24 met with several residents. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 98 1 MR. ZERANTE: Several. How many? 2 MR. SCHULTZ: The three adjoining, and 3 then they pointed me to Judy Gilmour, who I went 4 over and met with her and asked her if there is 5 any questions, please forward them to me, and if 08 :50PM 6 there is anything that the public would need, I 7 can provide plans and I can answer any questions, 8 and I pointed them to this public hearing. 9 I mean, I cannot visit every single 10 person in this community. I live in Yorkville, 08:51PM 11 too. I can only meet with who I can meet with in 12 that 500-foot district. I don't -- By law I don't 13 have to go to -- I don't know where you live in 14 Pavilion Heights. 15 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: I live 08:51PM 16 right on the property and I never heard. 17 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: I live 18 right next to the property. 19 MR. ZERANTE: I guess I 'm going to say, 20 with the number of people that could be affected 08 : 51PM 21 by this, the method -- I guess there is lack of 22 communication. 23 Then I have a couple other quick 24 questions here. You're going to put $5, 000 for DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 99 1 street cleaning? How long is that going to last? 2 MS. NOBLE: That's a City requirement. 3 That's a City standard. 4 MR. ZERANTE: Don't you think it should 5 be much more? 08:51PM 6 MS. NOBLE: That is a policy decision. V They are cooperating with us to put up more of a 8 security, and that will be determined when we have 9 final engineering plans. 10 MR. ZERANTE: And one final question. 08:51PM 11 What are they asking for, a $10, 000 bond, when 12 it's going to take a million dollars to rebuild 13 the road that's damaged? 14 What kind of a bond is the City 15 going to ask for in this case? 08:52PM 16 MS. NOBLE: The City is going to ask for 17 whatever is proportionate. 18 First of all, we have to be careful 19 how we tread because this is a public road and 20 they are entitled to drive on the public road just 08 : 52PM 21 as everyone else is, so we're not charging a user 22 fee. Neither is the County. 23 What we will consider is, as I 24 mentioned earlier, the City just made an ELAP DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 100 1 (phonetic) program in 2009, which is a shared, 2 state funded resurfacing of Fox Road, and that 3 included about a mile' s worth of resurfacing. 4 We have those numbers as to what it 5 cost to repair, do binders, surface cores, and we 08 :52PM 6 will be using those numbers to proportionately get 7 a figure that would appropriately match whatever 8 damage we estimate. 9 We are not coming up with those 10 numbers until we see final engineering plans, 08:53PM 11 which is what we're waiting for if they proceed 12 through the special use process before we issue 13 any permits, and that includes grading and that 14 includes soil and sedimentation protection plans. 15 MR. ZERANTE: And one final comment. 08:53PM 16 They say they're going to bring this back to ag 17 property, but yet they say that they're going to 18 do a future development. The odds of that 19 becoming developed, we'll all be in nursing homes 20 by that time. 08 : 53PM 21 It appears to me they are using this 22 land to get -- to avoid paying commercial and 23 industrial taxes versus paying taxes on 24 agricultural land. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 101 1 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Let me just 2 say that I think all of us sitting in front of the 3 room have heard everything that's been said, I 4 think we all heard it the same way, and I think 5 those of us individually need to go over in their 08 : 53PM 6 mind are there discrepancies in what's been said, 7 is there a flood issue? I happen to think there 8 is. 9 I think we have -- at least I have 10 many of the same questions as you do, so if you 08:54PM 11 would be so kind as to put your faith in us to 12 discuss this amongst ourselves. You are certainly 13 free to sit here and listen and so on, and then we 14 will make a recommendation. 15 Again I will reiterate that this 08:54PM 16 will go to the City Council on April -- 17 MS. NOBLE: April 10th. 18 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: -- April 10th and 19 you're certainly all welcome to come to that 20 meeting and state your concerns, or at least -- 08:54PM 21 that's up to the mayor to run that meeting. 22 So with that said, I will entertain 23 a motion to close the public hearing so we can 24 discuss that. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 102 1 MR. WEAVER: Motion to close the public 2 hearing. 3 MR. PROCHASKA: Second. 4 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Moved and seconded 5 to close the public hearing. Those in favor 08 : 54PM 6 signify by saying aye. 7 (A chorus of ayes . ) 8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Opposed? 9 (No response. ) 10 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: The motion passes. 08:54PM 11 (A discussion was had off 12 the record. ) 13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: PC2011 -- 1 4 MR. PROCHASKA: Continue it to the -- 1 5 Would the proper thing be that -- If you want, 09:17PM 16 I 'll make the motion. 17 I 'd like to ask that we would 18 continue the public hearing for PC 2012-01 to the 19 next regularly scheduled Plan Commission meeting. 20 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Is there a second? 09: 17PM 21 MR. WEAVER: Second. 22 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Problem, Krysti? 23 MS. NOBLE: No. 24 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. Staff says no DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 103 1 objection to it. Additional comments? 2 MS. NOBLE: Additional comments, no. 3 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Okay. 4 MR. CROUCH: Do we need to vote? 5 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Any further 09: 17PM 6 discussion? 7 (No response. ) 8 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Those in favor 9 signify by saying aye. 10 (A chorus of ayes. ) 09: 17PM 11 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Opposed? 12 (No response. ) 13 CHAIRMAN LINDBLOM: Motion passes. 14 MR. PROCHASKA: I make a motion that we 15 adjourn. 09:17PM 16 (Which were all the 17 proceedings had in 18 the public hearing 19 portion of the meeting. ) 20 ---000--- 21 22 23 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 104 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS . 2 COUNTY OF LA SALLE ) 3 I, Christine M. Vitosh, a Certified 4 Shorthand Reporter, do hereby certify that I 5 reported in shorthand the proceedings had at the 6 hearing of the above-entitled cause and that the 7 foregoing Report of Proceedings, Pages 1 through 8 105, inclusive, is a true, correct, and complete 9 transcript of my shorthand notes so taken at the 10 time and place aforesaid. 11 I further certify that I am neither 12 counsel for nor related to counsel for any of the 13 parties to this suit, nor am I in any way related 14 to any of the parties to this suit, nor am I in 15 any way interested in the outcome thereof . 16 I further certify that my 17 certificate annexed hereto applies to the original 18 transcript and copies thereof, signed and 19 certified under my hand only. I assume no 20 responsibility for the accuracy of any reproduced 21 copies not made under my control or direction . 22 23 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 105 1 In testimony whereof, I have 2 hereunto set my hand this 5th day of April , A. D . , 3 2012 .4 Ozg-&k'A. 5 6 Christine M . Vitosh, CSR 7 CSR No . 084-002883 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 106 $ 10:7 97:22 accuse[1]-66:15 agenda 111-3:18 40:7,43:23, 2009[21-32:14, 500-foot[1)- acre[1]-42:19 ago[3)-52:14, 50:3,50:5,64:2, $10,000[11- 100:1 98:12 act[2)-86:20, 68:9,92:24 66:4,75:8, 99:11 2012[2]-1:14, 5500[l1-32:15 86:22 agree[1]-49:13 84:24,86:18, $5,000 12)-31:19, 105:3 58[1]-4:24 activity[2]-9:16, agreed[21-33:6, 86:20,89:6, 98:24 2012-01[1]- 5th[1)-105:2 12:14 70:17 97:3,98:7 102:18 acts[1]-67:6 agreement[4]- answered[s1- 2012-02[2]-3:19, 6 actual[1]-32:17 6:8,10:6, 12:3, 5:19,20:7, 4:4 addition[21- 22:1 26:19,66:13, '78[11-78:2 21st[1]-48:10 60432[11-5:1 32:5,56:6 agricultural[3)- 88:22,86:12 O 23111-48:3 Additional[11- 4:13,80:3, answering[11- 23rd[1]-96:21 7 103:1 100:24 26:16 7[11-61:23 084-002883[1]- 25[21-36:20, additional[4]- agriculture[41- answers[41- 105:7 54:16 21:19,35:21, 9:17,18:4, 18:5, 74:9,78:19, 27[1)-61:21 71[41-75:18,77:15,79:2, 36:12, 103:2 18:6 78:20,91:12 1 88:16 address[13)- ahead[5]-9:19, anticipate[1]- 3 77-unit[11-7:5 7:14,8:15, 64:16,78:9, 44:11 1[1)-104:7 30 121-45:21, 7:00[11-1:15 12:19, 14:17, 84:5,88:10 anticipated[1]- 10131-21:17, 14:18, 14:19, aisle[1]-60:6 27:10 36:20,45:13 54.9 16:9,25:11, alcohol[1]- anyway[31- 10,000[1]-60:23 31st[1)-48:17 8 25:23,26:21, 21:12 45:11,88:11, 10-6B-2[1]-4:14 34[1]-29:12 8,000[1]-16:11 29:22,30:4, ALLEN[41- 9221 10-6C-2[1]-4:14 35[1]-45:2 71:13 66:21,67:15, Applause[4]- 38[11-95:19 BO[11-95:22 105[11-104:8 80,000[1]-16:23 addressed 111- 69:23,70:24 61:6,74:21, 10th 141-35:6, 800[1)-1:10 26:18 Allen[1)-66:22 79:22,90:19 35:7, 101:17, 4 addressing(1)- allow[sl-5:4, applause[3)- 101:18 43:21 5:18, 14:14, 43:4,72:4, 40[11-45:2 9 11[1]-22:3 44[1]-61:24 adequate[2)- 20:9,20:18, 91:10 12[4)-22:19, 45[1]-49:19 90[11-93:24 43:11,43:12 55:7 applicant's[1)-23:1,25:22, 99[11-56:24 adhere[z]- allowable[z]- 90:21 66:22 6:2233, 10:19,47[ -6:22,19, 48:15,48:17 11:21,21:1 application p1- 126[21-29:12, A adjacent[41- allowed[sl-4:13, 5:3,48:5,62:2, 10:22,20:24, 95:9 22:4,22:20, 6:19, 10:7, 62:3,62:8,13[11-25:7 27:19,28:5, AM[1]-105:2 23:3,52:5 11:24,29:6, 62:10,62:11 28:18,28:19, able[51-11:1, adjoining 30:16 applied[1]- 14[2)-1:14, 28:20,29:1, 1 9[1 1- 26:24 15:9,26:21, 98:2 almost[s)- 24:13 32:16,36:12, 58:10,58:18 adjourn 2 10:15, 18:10, applies[2]- 1416[t)-48:6 39:2,39:6,39:9, � [) 15[31-28:9, above-entitled[1) 94:12, 103:15 71:9,85:7,85:8, 11:19, 104:17 39:13,40:14, 95:20,95:23 41:19,42:8, -104:6 adoption[1 1- 93:22 appropriate[41- 150[1)-91:20 42:23,44:12, absolute[1)- 48:9 alone[1)-87:3 19:22,20:4,150-foot[11- adopts[1]-64:6 ALSO[1)-2:9 24:21,25:2 52:12,52:15, 26:24 absolute) 3 - appropriately 69:22 52:18,52:23, y[ 1 adult[11-54:10 alternate[11- )1) 16[4)-12:24, 52:24,53:10 41:22,42:3, adults[1)-54:13 42:22 -100:7 , 29:7,92:5, 54:20,55:2, 84'8 adversely[1]- amount 14]- approval[21- 69:16,70: 92:11 abuts[1)-71:11 18:15 44:11,44:15, 12:6,50:15 1 accelerating 17[1]-31:2 75:24,80:11, g[21- affect[11-18:15 44:16,61:14 approved[1)-6:8 18[31-31:5,31:9, 95:9 20:10,20:20 affected 11]- ample[1]-70:11 April[sl-35:6, 38:5 49[1)-44:21 acceptable[21- 98:20 analysis[1]- 35:7. 101:16, 19[1]-32:24 8:10,47:1 afford[1]-31:3 23:23 101:17, 101:18, 1974[1]-91:16 5 access 131-17:4, Andreano 1 105:2 aforesaid[1)- [ 1- 38:17,38:21 104:10 4:24 area[221-6:2, 2 5,000[12)-45:14, accident[2]- afterwards[11- annexation[51- 6:3,6:12,613, 58:23,59:1, 85:7,85:8 22:23 6:8, 10:6, 12:3, 6:24,7:3,9:16, 20[111-8:5,8:24, 59:12,59:16, accidents[2]- ag[4)-17:18, 22:1,34:12 10:11, 10:12, 34:11,34:22, 60:22,71:21, 35:24,36:8 27:4,31:11, annexed[1]- 13:20, 14:15, 45:13,45:21, 73:14,83:14, according[31- 100:16 104:17 18:18,26:3, 46:2,54:16, 89:17 13:2,39:7, agencies[3]- answer[201- 26:5,34:20, 84:10,94:5 50[31-42:9, 46:24 57:1,57:3, 5:20,9:3,22:7, 42:17,74:20, 200[21-5:1,87:4 44:19,80:20 accuracy[1]- 76:19 31:4,31:13, 78:23,79:18, 2006[3)-6:7,7:7, 500[21-46:11, 104:20 agency[1)-47:9 35:12,36:16, 81:24,83:11, Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 107 97:1 authorization[1] 29:12,87:18, 59:23,64:21 19:22, 19:24 57:14,59:19, areas[8]-4:8, -4:7 90:20 broader[i]- cattle[2]-68:8, 60:5,61:16, 5:5,6:16,33:17, available(3]- beyond[1]- 62:19 68:9 64:15,65:23, 40:5,51:10, 13:1, 13:12, 31:23 broke[1]-75:13 CDL[i]-21:11 66:5,66:9, 53:11 59:14 bicycle[1]-93:10 brought[ill- Center[2]-74:20, 66:12,66:19, argue[1]-92:15 average[i]-46:1 bicyclists[1]- 6:17,7:6,8:1, 75:1 67:13,71:2, Art[]-2:5 avoid[i]-100:22 21:9 33:11,33:17, certain[3]- 72:15,74:2, aspect[i]-62:18 avoided(2]- bid[5]-49:11, 39:16,43:9, 19:24,43:19, 75:7,76:6,77:8, asphalt[4]- 54:21,56:14 50:24,58:2, 49:3,67:11, 84:20 78:14,78:16, 29:16,30:12, awarded[1]- 58:24,59:9 85:5 certainly[5]- 83:18,83:23, 63:3,63:9 58:1 bidding[1]-58:4 brown[1]-68:22 43:12,58:7, 85:14,85:18, assault[i]-62:20 aware[1]-11:5 big[6]-36:7, Brumund[1]- 58:14, 101:12, 85:22,87:8, assessment[2]- axle(1]-16:24 40:1,67:10, 4:23 101:19 88:18,88:21, 51:1,51:5 aye[3]-3:6, 70:9,78:2, brush[1]-91:24 certificate[1]- 89:1,89:21, associated[1]- 102:6, 103:9 88:15 build[3]-33:1, 104:17 90:2,90:6, 5:17 ayes[4]-3:7, biggest[3]-22:9, 79:23,94:18 certification[1]- 91:14,93:15, Associates(2]- 3:24, 102:7, 45:11,45:13 building[1]- 47:21 94:10,94:19, 11:5,30:1 103:10 bike[i]-48:4 61:13 Certified[i]- 96:16, 101:1, Association[1]- Bill[1]-27:18 built 151-6:17, 104:3 101:18, 102:4, 35:17 B binders[1]- 6:19,67:1,83:9, certified[i]- 102:8, 102:10, assume[i]- 100:5 93:1 104:19 102:13, 102:20, 104:19 BA[1]-48:6 Birch[1]-26:12 bullfrog[1]-6:14 certify[8]-40:7, 102:22, 102:24, assurance[2]- backsliding(1]- bird[1]-70:7 bunch[2]-74:15, 40:9,40:10, 103:3, 103:5, 52:19,91:2 17:19 bit[4]-23:21, 92:19 40:13,47:17, 103:8, 103:11, assurances[i]- bank's[1]-95:11 49:19,58:17, Bureau[2]- 104:4, 104:11, 103:13 90:15 Barry[4]-90:4, 73:24 46:14,47:12 104:16 Chally[1]-71:6 astronomical[1]- 90:6,91:14, black[2]-49:24, business[4]- Chair[2]-7:14, chance[ -22:23 32:19 91:15 77:9 49:18,90:24, 7:17 change[2]- attached(1)- base[2]-33:2, blue[2]-61:17, 91:2,93:13 Chairman[3]- 67:15,95:14 11:3 34:4 61:18 by-products[i]- 2:2,4:22,5:2 changed[2]- attachment[1]- based[6]-25:6, board[4]-5:2, 29:15 CHAIRMAN[118]- 38:8,80:4 29:22 30:17,37:2, 11:4, 19:18, 3:1,3:5,3:8, changing[1]- attempt[1]- 51:4,51:16, 25:16 C 3:10,3:17,3:22, 78:4 28:11 95:11 Board(1]-48:9 4:1,4:3,4:20, charging(1]- attention[1]- basic[1]-80:7 bond[6]-17:19, cameras[i]-94:6 7:20,8:3,8:10, 99:21 49:4 battle[1]-88:15 31:10,31:14, camper[i]-93:6 8:17,8:20,9:1, Charles[1]-2:4 attorney(3]- beat[i]-59:19 32:9,99:11, can..[1]-55:24 9:6,9:9,9:14, check[i]-68:17 78:11,79:24, beautiful[1]- 99:14 cannot[9]- 11:11, 11:15, Chicago[i]- 95:5 61:4 bonding[1]- 16:13, 17:6, 12:15, 13:6, 52:16 attracting[i]- beaver[1]-91:23 17:14 23:12,45:6, 13:10, 13:19, chime(1]-8:16 78.23 became[1]-89:8 bought[2]-75:4, 69:23,75:17, 14:10, 14:13, China[i]-62:22 attributable[1]- become[1]-5:22 78.21 87:11,98:9 17:16, 18:13, choose p]- 32:23 becoming[i]- bound[1]-34:11 capacity[2]- 19:7,20:6, 57:16 audience[2]- 100:19 bounds[l]- 16:15, 16:22 20:17,21:6, chorus[4]-3:7, 35:9,50:21 began[1]-28:7 90:22 car[2]-54:3,94:2 21:17,22:3, 3:24, 102:7, AUDIENCE[22]- behalf[2]-4:5, Brandon[6]-4:6, care(3]-64:23, 22:19,22:22, 103:10 13:4,22:17, 4:16 14:21,25:13, 82:2,87:1 25:7,26:23, Christine[2]- 38:7,44:21, behind[3]- 27:16,28:21, careful[2]- 27:13,27:20, 104:3, 105:6 45:1,53:3, 35:14,67:24, 39:4 54:11,99:18 28:3,28:9,29:7, Circle[i]-66:22 66:17,73:11, 72:21 breaks[1]-29:16 carry[2]-16:23, 31:2,31:9. citizens[2]- 75:3,92:7, below[i]-15:6 bridge[i]-72:18 84:18 32:24,34:10, 10:19,35:22 94:13,94:21, best(4]-6:14, briefly(i]-72:6 cars[2]-38:3, 34:21,35:7, CITY p]-1:2 95:1,95:13, 13:1, 13:12, bring[13]-3:19, 53:20 36:15,36:23, city[14]-6:6, 95:17,95:24, 22:15 6:12,45:17, cart[i]-72:1 39:19,40:23, 9:24, 16:2, 96:5,96:11, bet[i]-80:24 53:1,57:6, case[2]-10:15, 41:2,41:4,41:8, 18:10,20:8, 97:15,97:18, better(5]-5:23, 57:10,65:9, 99:15 45:4,46:6,46:9, 32:3,32:20, 98:15,98:17 31:13,58:19, 74:12,82:20, cash[6]-32:9, 47:14,47:22, 33:20,37:19, Aurora[1]-79:9 72:13,92:2 83:14,85:11, 95:18,96:1, 48:1,51:24, 82:22,85:15, authority[i]- between[6]- 91:3, 100:16 96:3,96:4,96:7 52:3,53:5,53:7, 85:17,89:16, 31:24 16:3,22:9,24:8, bringing[2]- category[2]- 53:14,56:1, 90:10 Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 108 City[51]-4:15, closed(1)-96:3 19:12,20:4 42:12,43:2, contingent p)- 82:18 6:6,6:8, 10:9, closing[1)- complete[1]- 70:14,70:15, 60:10 county[e)-10:1, 14:23, 16:3, 20:12 104:8 74:18,99:23 continue[2]- 16:1, 16:8, 17:5, 17:9, coach[1]-92:24 completely[4]- consideration[i] 102:14, 102:18 38:17,38:18, 17:11, 17:12, Code[1]-4:15 81:8,81:9, -89:22 contract[2]- 70:6,70:9 17:20, 19:21, college[1]-38:6 81:21,83:6 considered[1]- 58:2,65:13 County po)- 20:2,20:18, combine[s]- completes[i]- 42:6 contractor(21- 16:4, 16:20, 21:19,21:23, 21:3 34:22 considering[4)- 23:22,47:20 17:3, 17:5,57:2, 25:17,25:20, combustible[11- completion[2)- 17:19,20:11, contribute[i)- 60:17,69:5, 31:3,32:14, 11:21 27:1,27:8 21:7,50:16 34:18 99:22 35:1,35:6, comfortable[i)- compliance[1)- construction[4)- control[a]-14:7, COUNTY[1]- 49:13,50:8, 90:16 50:12 49:18,77:14, 19:23,22:14, 104:2 50:10,50:12, coming[171- comply[i]-64:4 79:10,86:24 31:18,33:19, couple[5]- 50:16,60:17, 12:11,23:10, composting[i)- Construction[17) 67:4,75:18, 31:15,49:6, 61:23,65:16, 24:14,30:8, 77:6 -4:5, 14:21, 104:21 94:1,94:5, 76:11,80:17, 35:21,36:5, compounds[2]- 19:9, 19:10, Control[1]-48:9 98:23 80:21,81:1, 36:6,36:11, 29:10,29:20 23:9,25:13, cooperating(1)- Court[1)-26:12 85:11,85:21, 40:4,53:11, Comprehensive 27:9,27:14, 99:7 cover[1)-68:24 86:6,86:12, 59:4,68:20, (3)-6:5, 10:10, 28:10,28:22, cooperative[2]- crappie p,- 87:22,88:1, 77:15,86:2, 21:24 30:21,37:3, 17:8,32:1 33:13 89:15,94:4, 93:3,93:24, concept[i]- 39:4,45:9, copies[5)-8:19, Crawford[1]- 99:2,99:3, 100:9 62:13 45:11,49:10, 9:13,96:20, 33:8 99:14,99:16, comment[6]- conceptual[1]- 94:14 104:18, 104:21 crazy[1]-71:15 99:24, 101:16 16:10,23:18, 34:16 consultant[7)- copy(i)-8:24 creating[1]-20:3 City's(81-11:13, 28:22,53:7, concern[7)- 17:12,23:20, cores[1]-100:5 creative(1)11:18, 17:19, 78:15, 100:15 36:7,37:17, 27:17,56:4, coring[i]-49:21 53:17 19:8,22:1,49:8, comments[3]- 37:18,37:22, 56:11,76:8, corn[1]-50:1 credit[2)-32:10, 50:8,76:22 77:13, 103:1, 54:3,54:14, 76:11 corner[s)-35:13, 62:13 clarification[1]- 103:2 77:2 consultants(11- 66:20,68:19, creek[1 i-78:3 61:10 commercial(9)- concerned[5)- 23:8 71:6,78:6,90:3 Creek(3)-71:11, clarify(3)-36:16, 21:13,94:15, 62:18,69:1, consume[1)- corners[1]-4:10 71:13,78:8 53:8,64:1 94:22,95:4, 80:7,90:23, 21:12 cornfield[1)- criteria[2]- clean[23)-6:18, 95:5,95:6,96:8, 93:21 consuming[1]- 21:5 19:17,64:9 7:2, 10:12,25:4, 96:15, 100:22 concerns[8)- 83:17 correct[3]-43:8, crossing[1]- 26:3,26:5, Commission(15) 5:9,32:13, contacting[1)- 64:14, 104:8 68:8 28:16,29:6, -3:13,6:7,8:2, 35:17,37:9, 97:8 corridor[1)- Crouch[i]-2:3 30:20,39:17, 19:15,39:11, 46:14,66:13, contain(2)-29:9, 72:22 CROUCH(2)- 49:9,49:14, 40:20,42:9, 90:18, 101:20 80:14 cost[1]-100:5 3:20, 103:4 49:16,49:17, 43:16,43:17, concrete[4)- contaminants(3) costs(4)-32:18, CSR[2)-105:6, 49:23,51:16, 55:1,57:16, 30:12,58:10, -23:13,46:16, 34:19,58:6, 105:7 63:2,63:21, 64:10,73:22, 63:3,63:9 76:20 58:8 current[s]- 64:12,86:5, 97:3, 102:19 concurrent(1)- contaminated Council[12)-6:8, 11:10, 13:16, 86:7,86:9, COMMISSION, 28:5 [ie]-24:9, 87:10 7:6,25:17,33:7, 29:11,30:18, -1:5 condition[5)- 24:22,24:23, 35:1,35:2,35:4, 41:15,73:8 cleaned[1]-92:2 committed ii]- 39:11,40:19, 25:3,25:5,30:3, 35:6,66:15, cut[t]-77:19 cleaning[3)- 43:22 40:21,53:13, 30:6,30:22, 85:12,96:20, cut-off[1]-77:19 31:19,31:21, committee[2]- 57:17 46:20,51:11, 101:16 99:1 69:12,69:15 conditions - 76:1,80:13, clear[5]-26:17, [ ) council[2)- p communication 65:8 80:14,80:15, 29:24,74:18 50:20,89:5, 11)-98:22 confirmation(2)- 80:23,80:24, counsel[2]- D-965812[1)- 91:20,92:4 community[5)- 16:19,62:3 86:14 104:12 1:24 clearly[1]-18:8 5:22,5:23, conformance[7] [1) dairy -68:9 client(3)-15:20, count[�)-44:2 ry[) 15:17,33:23, -6:5, 10:5, -87:24 dam(1)-67:6 28:15,44:9 counted[i)- 98:10 18:23, 18:24, contamination[4) 48:22 damage[5]- clients[1]-33:5 Community[i)- 21:22,33:19, -11:9,24:21, 14:23, 17:10, Clinton[9]-5:1 2:10 33:20 51:2,86:5 country -54:5, 79:3,79:7 32:22, 100:8 clock[1]-74:13 company[4)- conjunction[2)- context(3)-26:7, Countryside(2)- damaged[1]- close[5)-44:22, 12:23,56:17, 12:1, 12:8 37:24,38:2 74:19,75:1 99:13 84:14, 101:23, 84:11,84:13 consider[8]- contingency[i)- counts[4)-38:1, dams pl-91:23 102:1, 102:5 compatible[2)- 12:16, 13:20, 91:7 40:8,40:10, darts[1)-46:5 Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 109 data[3]-13:1, 43:13,99:6 33:16,34:3, 59:11,63:2, 29:16,32:4, 60:2,60:3,61:2, 13:13, 19:3 dedicated[1]- 48:7,49:20, 64:13,64:19, 33:12,35:22, 61:5,61:7,79:1, date[3]-26:24, 97:11 100:19 69:13,71:22, 38:4,42:23, 83:15,88:16 27:8,68:16 deem(2)-19:21, developer[3]- 73:14,73:16, 45:7,45:16, dumped[1]- Dave[9]-9:19, 34:19 7:4, 18:1, 18:22 73:18,74:19, 49:22,53:20, 63:15 14:18, 15:13, deemed[1]- developing[1]- 82:20 54:5,54:18, dumping[9]- 15:21,22:7, 24:10 39:15 disagree(4]- 54:22,63:12, 9:16,9:21, 23:4,25:11, defined[1]-25:3 Development[1] 33:6,43:5, 68:13,69:5, 12:16, 18:15, 29:21 defines(1]- -2:10 44:17,80:16 71:10,71:12, 18:18,22:4, David[3]-8:13, 24:21 development[311 disagreement(1) 72:22,75:18, 63:19,63:22, 12:20, 13:11 defining[1]- -6:9,6:11, -44:18 77:16,77:17, 71:21 D"IDSON[54]- 24:22 6:21,6:22,7:11, disaster[1 - 77:18,78:3, dumps[1]-84:20 4:19,4:22,7:22, definition[2]- 7:12,9:24,12:1, 85:13 78:6,81:23, duration[1]-27:6 8:9,8:12,9:13, 49:17,86:7 12:8, 14:4, 14:9, discrepancies[2] 82:23,91:6, during[5]-21:3, 9:18, 12:18, degree[1]-40:4 15:16,21:23, -90:20, 101:6 91:21,92:4, 21:12,25:14, 14:17, 15:12, delineated(1]- 22:15,24:2, discretion[1]- 92:9 53:24,56:5 17:21, 18:17, 13:16 25:14,25:18, 7:14 drain[1]-42:17 DUSELL(4)- 19:13,20:14, delineation(1]- 31:20,31:21, discuss(3]- drainage[12]- 90:9,90:14, 20:22,21:10, 24:8 33:15,33:21, 66:14, 101:12, 42:16,67:3, 90:20,91:11 21:21,22:7, demand[1]- 33:22,43:22, 101:24 67:7,68:14, Dusell[1]-90:9 23:4,25:10, 31:24 50:11,61:12, discussion[3]- 69:1,71:13, dust[1]-25:9 28:14,29:4, demanding[1]- 65:2,95:4,95:6. 38:16, 102:11, 72:7,72:8, dwell[1]-79:12 29:21,31:6, 62:22 95:7, 100:18 103:6 72:18,73:9, 31:12,33:3, demise(2]- developments[2] discussions[2]- 83:2,89:12 E 36:19,37:23, 20:10,20:20 -17:20,49:20 26:8,27:11 drained[1]- 38:9,38:13, Department[7]- Dhuse[1]-97:5 distance[i]- 42:20 earn[1]-58:11 39:3,39:14, 10:16, 15:15, dictate[2]- 70:10 draining[3]- East[2]-4:24, 41:13,41:22, 15:18 34:9 44:14,44:16 District[1]-4:8 13:21, 14:1, 26:12 42:3,43:14, 47:6,56:7, diets[1]-62:23 district[2]-20:5, 14:5 economy(1]-7:4 44:5,44:9, 56:11 difference[1]- 98:12 drains[1]-72:22 Edge[4]-16:2, 44:17,60:12, department[1]- 65:8 ditch[2]-92:3, dried(1]-92:11 60:8,96:19, 63:4,63:21, 38:18 differences[1]- 92:9 drinking[1]- 97:9 63:24,64:4, depressional[2]- 87:17 divides[2]-72:9, 53:22 educate[1]- 64:14,64:22, 6:16,33:17 different p]- 72:18 drive(s]-81:7, 50:21 65:22,94:24, Dervin[1]-66:22 30:7,32:4,40:4, division[1]- 82:9,82:13, effect(3]-24:13, 95:3,95:16, design[1]-37:20 70:19,72:8, 38:18 92:18,99:20 48:13,48:16 95:19,96:2, designated[1]- 72:17,85:12 DNR[6]-46:13, Drive[3]-32:16, effectively[1]- 96:8,96:13 19:21 differential[1]- 46:17,47:1, 48:4,61:21 18:20 Davidson[2]- designed[2]- 13:21 47:5,47:8, drivers[3]- effectuate[3]- 4:23,4:24 16:22,60:20 difficult[1)- 47:14 21:10,21:11, 6:20,6:22, days[6]-28:1, details[1]-73:1 25:23 document[2]- 90:11 33:22 36:21,37:5, determination[1] direction[2]- 61:22,61:23 drives[2]-21:4 eight[2]-20:7, 37:7,44:2, -19:19 72:13, 104:21 dollars[1]-99:12 driveway(1]- 54:9 45:13 determine[8]- directly[2]- Don[1]-39:22 91:20 either 11]-61:18 dead[2]-26:24, 11:8, 17:14, 13:22, 14:5 done[19]-9:23, driving[1]-21:14 ELAP[1]-99:24 27:7 40:11,41:15, Director[1]-2:11 12:1, 14:23, drop[2]-26:24, Eldamain[1]- deal[3]-55:5, 51:10,80:2, dirt[42]-6:1,6:2, 22:14,25:3, 27:7 28:12 75:17,88:5 81:14,84:17 6:4,6:12,6:17, 27:11, 32:22, drop-dead[2]- elevation[4]- dealing[2]- determined[6]- 6:18,6:24,7:1, 33:18, 33:20, 26:24,27:7 13:21,65:7, 43:17,85:1 13:23, 15:7, 23:10,23:11, 33:21,38:1, drug[1]-21:12 69:22,89:11 debris[2]-29:9, 39:17,51:16, 26:3,26:5, 43:6,50:22, dryers[1]-91:24 elevations(2]- 31:16 65:1,99:8 28:16,28:17, 60:23,61:12, due[1]-43:15 64:24,73:2 decide[1]-34:24 determines[2]- 30:10,30:20, 70:24,88:14, duly[1]-3:16 elsewhere[1]- decided[3]- 81:15,81:17 33:12,33:13, 95:6,96:21 dump(21)-5:24, 37:19 32:10,66:7, develop[41- 33:16,37:6, doors[1]-71:3 20:10,20:20, empirical[1]- 88:10 6:10,7:5, 10:4, 39:16,39:17, doorway[2]- 26:9,26:13, 19:3 decides[1]- 17:22 41:18,44:11, 64:17, 77:9 26:14,33:1, encouraged[1]- 40:20 developed[9]- 44:15,44:20, doubts[1]-83:19 33:3,33:11, 97:8 decision[4]- 19:5, 19:23, 49:24,53:10, down[34]-18:20, 34:2,44:23, end[6]-17:18, 19:14,35:2, 33:11,33:15, 57:5,57:7, 19:6,21:4, 52:17,54:8, 18:1,28:8,31:7, Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 110 65:3,70:20 essentially[2)- extreme[2]- 97:22 firm(3]-4:23, 37:9,37:14, energy[1]-8:6 23:10,73:8 13:21, 17:10 felt[1]-20:3 8:14,96:13 62:7,84:16, engaged[i]- Estates[4]-4:11; FEMA[3]-13:3, First[1]-99:18 94:9 76:3 12:2,41:11, F 13:14,62:5 first[14]-3:19, follow-up[1]- engineer[7]- 53:16 fertiliaer(i]- 9:21, 11:13, 15:24 12:18, 12:23, estimate[3]- face[1]-93:4 23:16 20:18,47:24, followed[1]- 13:12,56:8, 36:17,71:22, faces(1)-67:12 few(1 o)-9:11, 48:2,49:6,50:4, 62:11 64:23,65:20, 100:8 facilitate(2]- 9:13, 14:15, 50:7,52:1,73:4, following[3]- 76:17 estimated[i]- 42:24,49:14 33:5,52:14, 78:22,79:15, 6:1,22:13, Engineering[2]- 44:2 fact[6]-20:11, 67:12,67:18, 89:7 57:21 2:12,24:18 estimating(2]- 30:12,54:2, 79:13,80:18, FISCHER[3]- Ford[1]-41:11 engineering[15]- 59:4,59:6 55:14,79:1, 92:24 8:19,8:23,9:4 foregoing[1]- 8:14,9:20, evening[2]- 82:8 field[3]-46:21, Fischer[i]-8:23 104:7 15:22, 17:12, 24:17,66:21 facts[4]-72:16, 56:9,68:22 fishing[1]-33:13 forest[3]-22:5, 22:15,23:19, event[2]-25:15, 84:2,84:4 fight[i]-88:15 fit[1[-59:2 22:11,68:11 42:18,56:11, 30:4 fairness[1]- figure[2]-58:19, five[4]-17:17, Forest[1]-22:4 72:24,73:6, Evergreen[e]- 43:15 100:7 38:15,44:23, forget(1]-61:8 89:10,89:16, 4:11,5:6, 12:2, faith[1]-101:11 figured[]-58:5 44:24 form[1]-32:9 89:19,99:9, 12:21,46:12, fall(2]-21:4, filing[i]-65:24 fix[2]-82:4, former[2]-29:11, 100:10 62:12,67:20, 97:20 fill(34]-4:8,7:2, 82:17 33:8 engineers[2]- 97:7 familiar[2]- 10:13, 11:6, flag(1]-93:11 formerly(3]-5:5, 15:8,34:5 evidence[1]- 67:14,72:7 28:18,28:24, flies[1]-70:8 34:12,48:22 Enmarc[9]-11:5, 43:12 Family[1]-4:7 29:2,29:6, flood[7]-74:1, forth[5]-10:9, 30:1,47:21, exactly[2]- fancy[1]-93:1 30:14,36:11, 78:2,81:4, 19:17,55:6, 50:5,50:17, 71:14,96:6 fantastic[1[- 39:2,39:8, 82:14,83:5, 58:10,60:24 50:18,76:3, excavated[1]- 88:14 40:17,49:9, 101:7 forward[2]- 76:7,76:10 33:18 far(3]-7:19, 49:14,49:16, flooded[7]-71:8, 17:14,98:5 entering[1)- excavating[2]- 41:18,58:19 49:17,49:23, 71:15,81:8, foundation[1]- 38:23 12:4,64:7 farm[4]-49:18, 57:11,58:12, 82:5,83:6, 94:3 Enterprises[2]- excavation[2]- 62:23,68:9, 58:15,63:2, 83:11,92:1 four(2]-14:13, 2:13,24:18 56:5,57:23 93:4 63:21,64:12, flooding[2]- 65:10 entertain[2]- exceed[3]-11:9, Farm[5]-1:10, 67:8,69:18, 74:7,83:13 Fox[42]-4:10, 35:8, 101:22 30:17,34:7 4:11,5:6,33:8, 69:24,73:3, floodplain[2o]- 5:10,5:13,5:14, Entertain[1]-3:1 except[1]-92:20 97:7 83:1,86:5,86:7, 12:17, 13:15, 5:15, 14:6, 15:4, entire[3[-18:11, excuse[4]-8:20, farmed[1[-73:9 86:10,87:10 13:17, 13:18, 15:5, 15:7, 71:8,73:19 45:20,62:8, farmer[1]-21:3 filled[2]-33:14, 13:22, 13:24, 16:10,20:9, entitled[2]- 83:23 farming[2]- 62:8 14:5, 14:6, 20:13,20:18, 99:20, 104:6 Excuse[l]- 62:18,63:5 filling[io]-5:4, 42:17,61:24, 21:8,26:12, entitlement[1]- 57:15 farmland[1]- 9:22,9:23, 10:4, 62:6,62:9,71:7, 32:15,33:9, 18:21 exist[1[-61:24 62:20 10:7, 11:20, 78:12,81:12, 33:13,35:19, entity[2]-75:19, existing[4]- Farms(2]-62:12, 12:5, 18:18, 81:13,81:20, 38:4,42:8, 76:19 65:8,66:24, 67:20 64:7,83:16 92:12,94:16, 46:11,48:3, entrance[1[- 68:18,73:10 favor[4]-3:6, fills[1]-59:12 94:23 53:20,60:24, 38:21 exit[i]-38:21 3:23, 102:5, final[7]-34:17, floodplains[1]- 66:22,69:4, environmental exiting[i]-38:23 103:8 35:2,73:5,99:9, 78:11 69:6,70:7, [9o]-23:7, expansion[1]- favorable[3]- 99:10, 100:10, floods[3]-78:1, 72:11,72:21, 27:17,30:24, 6:23 25:16,25:17, 100:15 91:17,91:20 72:22,77:14, 51:1,51:5,56:4, expected[1]- 64:10 finance[l]- flowing(1]- 78:6,85:2,85:3, 56:23,57:4, 36:18 February[i]- 95:18 82:22 91:21,92:21, 76:14,76:17 experience[l]- 96:21 financed[1]- flows(2)-81:22, 93:21,97:5, environmentalis 61:15 federal[4]- 96:1 81:23 97:23, 100:2 t[1]-40:12 expert(3)-44:4, 81:16,81:19, financial[2]- flyer[4]-5:10, frankly[1]-17:23 EPA[4]-87:1, 44:8,44:10 82:3,82:16 96:9,96:14 5:11,26:11, Fred[1]-90:9 87:2,87:3,87:6 expertise[1]- fee[2]-65:24, fine[2]-65:14, 97:12 free[1]-101:13 erosion(3)-14:7, 23:14 99:22 80:4 folks[7]-7:15, front(4)-39:21, 22:13,22:14 experts[2]- feet[io]-32:15, finish[1]-50:2 28:22,30:24, 75:9,87:20, especially[2]- 35:12,46:4 42:19,46:11, finished(2]- 38:10,39:3, 101:2 20:11,21:7 explain[1]-97:2 54:9,65:10, 27:4,79:1 43:23,63:13 fuel[1]-49:2 essence;n;- extent[1]-19:2 80:18,80:20, FIRM[3]-13:3, follow[8]-15:24, fulfill[1]-12:11 13:24 extra[1]-20:12 87:13,91:20, 13:13,62:4 22:12,37:1, full[6]-28:20, Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 111 49:2,59:17, 98:3 52:15,55:9, HEARING[1]- Hirsch[1]-39:22 71:19,85:24 given[2]-46:20, 87:5,87:10 1:6 hIRSCH[1]-41:3 function[1]- 73:1 guess[151-13:8, hearing[131-3:2, history[11-48:23 idea(4)-25:22, 19:20 glad[3]-26:20, 29:18,30:4, 4:4, 11:24, hit;, -54:7, 79:13,86:1, funded(1)-100:2 26:21,67:16 39:23,40:7, 78:18,86:17, 93:12 89:10 future(9]-10:8, glasses[1]-71:3 40:8,40:11, 97:4,98:8, hold[31-11:15, ideal(11-10:16 18:6, 18:7, Glen[7]-46:11, 55:22,59:7, 101:23, 102:2. 90:6,97:1 identified[1)- 18:12, 18:21, 48:3,66:22, 68:8,75:5,83:4, 102:5, 102:18, holes(2]-5:4, 20:1 22:2,33:1, 69:4,72:21, 89:13,98:19, 103:18, 104:6 11:20 identifies(1]- 33:24, 100:18 97:5,97:23 98:21 heavily[1]-15:19 home[3]-36:6, 11:19 God[3]-52:16, guidelines[2]- heavy[1]-14:14 61:13,81:2 idiot[i1-92:21 G 86:20,86:22 30:18,84:17 hedged[11- Homeowner's[1] IDOT[1 1]-11:1, Google[1]-68:16 guys[8]-15:7, 58:17 -35:16 23:7,27:9,28:6, Game[1)-1:10 governed[21- 60:11,61:4, height(l]-69:24 homeowners[1)- 30:18,39:24, Gary[2)-4:23, 15:10,29:5 78:9,88:13, Heights[12]- 23:3 50:23,57:1, 16:5 government[7]- 88:14,93:23, 5:15,71:6, homes[3]-6:18, 76:11,76:18, gas P1-29:9, 57:1,57:3, 94:1 71:16,74:15, 33:1, 100:19 76:24 29:12,29:13, 81:16,81:19, 75:11,77:12, homework[i1- IEPA[22]-10:17, 29:19,48:22, 82:3,82:16 H 81:23,82:23, 62:15 10:24,22:12, 51:7 grade[4]-4:8, 83:5,91:19, honest[2]-83:8, 23:7,24:19, GAWLIK[221- 24:4,64:20, half[q-14:19 98:14 85:3 24:24,30:18, 51:22,52:2, 78:4 halo[1]-54:10 heights[1]- honest) - 30:23,39:24, 52:4,52:9,53:6, Hammel[1]-4:24 y(] grading P]-9:22, 69:20 82:17 47:7,47:12, 78:18,79:23, 9:23, 10:4, 10:8, hand[7]-3:13, help(5]-36:16, Honor -88:9 47:13,47:16, 81:15, 81:18, 18:18,31:18, 8:18,8:21, 38:12,75:14, Hoover[3)-22:4, 48:6,49:4,55:6, 83:21,84:1, 100:13 35:10,77:10, 75:15 22:18,22:20 55:9,75:12, 85:16,85:20, granting[1]- 104:19, 105:2 helping[1]-8:15 hope(2]-17:24, 75:17,76:14, 85:24,86:9, 57:17 handle[91- hereby[1]-104:4 77:1 76:18,86:8 86:22,87:9, gravel[1]-49:22 57:23,67:10, hereto[1]- hoping[1]-90:15 ignore(2]-88:10, 88:4,88:20, great[4]-54:11 68:2,71:20, 104:17 horse[1)-72:2 88:13 88:24,89:3, 77:16,85:4, ( ] hour[6)-90:12, 55:5,86:10, hereunto � - [II[1]-90:22 89:24 4 86:2,87:3,87: 90:13,90:14, 86:15 105:2 ILLINOIS[2]-1:3, Gawi[k[2]-52:2, Green[2]-8:13, hands(11-28:20 HETTINGER[3)- 92:5,93:24, 104:1 52:4 13:12 happy[1]-93:5 74:14,74:22, 94:5 Illinois[21]-1:11, general[3)- green[1]-68:21 hard[1]-94:8 75:5 hours[31-21:13, 4:12,51, 10:2, 12:11, 15:22, grew[4]-5:10, hardly[2)-68:7, Hettinger[1]- 53:24,58:5 10:16, 10:17, 89:4 5:13,26:12, 92:10 74:15 house[9]-32:51 15:14, 15:17, generally[11- 49:17 Harold[;]-61:20 Hi[1]-75:10 68:18,71:8, 24:20,34:8, 23:20 hat[1]-61:18 43:18,48:8, gridlock(]-42:8 high[s]-21:8, 82:11,83:6, gentleman[18]- grind(1]-30:9 haul[3]-45:12, 44:2,58:21, 83:9,83:11, 56:7,56:22, 27:13,35:14, gross(1]-38:15 52:16,52:20 68:7,69:24 94:2 61:21,68:5, 39:20,41:4, ground[s1-25:1, hauling[6]-37:6, High[1]-70:6 houses(1)- 70:3,75:13, 45:8,53:9, 25:4,25:6, 44:20,45:16, higher[3]-33:18, 67:24 76:3,95:7, 54:16,60:5, 59:20,69:7 58:8,58:12, 64:19,65:3 housing[2]- 96:14 61:17,64:16, -75:24 immediately(1]- grounds(i]-6:15 highest[�]-70:5 18:2,19:2 66:20,66:23, hazardous[2] 6:13 71:2,72:15, growing[1]-6:15 highway(sl- HR[z]-8:13, 29:10,29:19 impact[4]- grows[1]-50:1 16:8,20:24, 13:11 74:12,77:8, heads[1]-72:12 21:20,21:22, 78:17,86:10 guarantee[1�]- 21:2,38:18, huge[�]-63:11 hear[7]-9:2, 31:10,42:1 George[2]-60:7, 17:17, 18:3, 50:23 hum[1]-40:15 g 21:6,23:12, 13:4,45::55,74:7, 20:9,20:11 hike[1]-93:9 hundred 1101- impacted - , 91:19 78:1,829, GILMOUR[ill- 32:8,47:2,47:8, hiking[1]-92:20 36:4,42:10, 97:13 51:11 46:8,46:10, 49:12,57:9, hill[1)-93:3 45:12,45:22, heard[14]-14:3, important[3]- 47:11,47:15, 80:17,80:22, 42:8,52:13, hire[1)-75:23 46:2,54:17, 47:23,48:3, 86:13,86:16, hired[3]-23:23, 80:18,84:11 15:1, 15:14, , 86:21,87:12, 53:3,66:22, 76:11,76:12 87:13,89:18 26:14 48:19,63:17, 74:9,76:4, 69:22,72:10, 87:15,87:24 imposed[11- hiring[3]-47:17, hungry(�]-62:21 guarantees[101- 80:10,84:9, 75:19,76:2 hunting[1]-6:15 25:19 18:14,23:1, HIRSCH[a]- 72:12 84:15,90:11, impossible[1)- Gilmour[31- 25:23,28:10, 98:16, 101:3, 39:22 40:14 93:22 46:10,48:3, 101:4 improve 29:8,39:1, , , rove 40:16,40:22 P [2] Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 112 10:19,71:14 43:2 joggers[1]-21:9 32:7,42:23, 32:9 75:7,76:6,77:8, improvement p] intend[i1-64:4 JOHNSON[9]- 50:11,64:7, letting[i]-27:9 78:14,78:16, -38:24 intent[z]-17:22, 61:20,62:17, 67:7,68:22, level[51-6:12, 83:18,83:23, improvements[3] 28:15 63:7,63:11, 69:19,75:4, 32:6,64:20, 85:14,85:18, -10:22,23:9, intention[21- 63:15,63:18, 78:21, 100:22, 73:18 85:22,87:8, 37:4 27:5,65:3 63:22,64:3, 100:24 leveled[1]-24:3 88:18,88:21, improves[q-7:4 inter[1]-10:22 64:12 Land[2]-46:14, levels[31-24:21, 89:1,89:21, improving[1]- interested[i1- Johnson[2]- 47:12 25:2,25:6 90:2,90:6, 20:24 104:15 61:20,61:21 landfill[2]- life[1]-81:2 91:14,93:15, inches[21-92:5, interject[U-72:5 Joliet[1]-5:1 34:13,51:13 light[t1-89:14 94:10,94:19, 92:11 investigation[2]- judge[21-87:20, landfills[1]-26:9 likelihood[1]- 96:16, 101:1, include[i]-97:4 51:6,51:10 88:8 lane[1]-85:10 29:13 101:18, 102:4, included[1]- involuntarily[1]- Judy[31-46:7, lapse[11-63:8 limit[6]-16:13, 102:8, 102:10, 100:3 95:4 46:10,98:3 large[3]-31:20, 40:21,69:13, 102:13, 102:20, includes[2]- involved[61- Julie[6]-2:12, 37:16,68:3 84:21,94:5, 102:22, 102:24, 100:13, 100:14 5:12, 15:19, 8:23,23:21, last[7]-12:24, 94:9 103:3, 103:5, including[1]- 40:3,81:2,88:2, 24:15,24:17, 57:24,60:6, limited[4]- 103:8, 103:11, 95:8 97:22 27:17 71:9,85:7, 39:12,52:14, 103:13 inclusive[i]- isolated[1]-30:6 July[3]-24:6, 95:23,99:1 52:23,80:11 linear[i1-32:15 104:8 issue[16]-9:15, 48:10,48:17 late[1]-88:19 limiting[1]-39:5 Lisa[1]-53:15 increase[31- 19:8, 19:16, junk[11-92:1 laugh[1]-82:11 limits[3]-15:4, list[1]-97:20 24:7,38:14, 26:1,31:17, jurisdiction[1]- Lauwers[21- 15:6,16:2 listed[i]-56:16 84:23 33:7,80:9,81:3, 17:3 90:4,91:15 Lindblom[1]-2:2 listen[z]-5:19, increased[2]- 82:15,82:17, LAUWERS[4]- LINDBLOM[1 16]- 101:13 37:11,38:9 83:13,83:14, K 90:4,90:8, 3:1,3:5,3:8, literally[1]-26:1 independent[2]- 83:20,84:14, 91:15,92:8 3:10,3:17,3:22, live[13]-33:8, 40:12,76:17 100:12, 101:7 keep[31-9:7, law[i o]-4:23, 4:1,4:3,4:20, 39:22,46:11, India[1]-62:22 issued[1]-62:4 32:3,70:13 25:1,43:18, 7:20,8:3,8:10, 60:8,71:6, indicated[2]- issues[4]-7:15, Keith[i]-71:5 50:13,57:3, 8:17,8:20,9:1, 75:11,77:12, 26:13,51:17 7:17, 17:6,74:4 Kendall[2]-16:4, 70:23,95:20, 9:6,9:9,9:14, 79:7,90:4, indicates[i]- issuing[2]- 57:2 95:21,96:13, 11:11, 11:15, 98:10,98:13, 11:6 16:18, 16:20 kept[11-67:16 98:12 12:15, 13:6, 98:15,98:17 individual[1]- item[»]-14:13, key[1]-16:12 Lawn(s)-5:10, 13:10, 13:19, lived[61-38:5, 86:21 19:7,21:17, kid[i]-6:15 5:13,5:15, 14:10, 14:13, 78:1,78:2,81:5, individually[2l- 22:3,22:19, kids[41-36:6, 26:12,33:9 17:16, 18:13, 91:16,91:18 74:10, 101:5 23:1,25:22, 54:12,92:19, laws[2]-37:15, 19:7.20:6, lives[i]-78:10 individuals[1]- 26:23,29:7, 93:2 79:16 20:17,21:6, living[1]-79:10 97:12 31:2,32:24 kind[9]-42:1, lawsuit[1 1-31:3 21:17,22:3, LLC[il-4:6 industrial[3]- Item[1]-25:7 50:20,53:17, lawyer[1]-64:22 22:19,22:22, load[e]-15:4, 19:12,42:24, items[i]-3:18 91:6,91:8, lawyers[1]-31:7 25:7,26:23, 15:6, 16:23, 100:23 itself[z]-48:5, 93:10,97:16, leaches[1]-49:2 27:13,27:20, 40:8,40:10, industries[1]- 81:7 99:14, 101:11 leading[2]- 28:3,28:9,29:7, 44:23,84:22, 58:3 Ivy[1]-61:21 knows[s]-31:13, 34:13,35:19 31:2,31:9, 90:12 information[11- 44:9,49:4, leaking[3]- 32:24,34:10, loaded[1]-60:1 32:11 J 52:16,66:5 29:13 29:14 34:21,35:7, loads[161-45:12, infrastructure[4] KRAUPNER[l]- 51:8 36:15,36:23, 45:14,45:17, -34:19,71:23, Jacobs[1]-4:24 9:11 least[31-81:6, 39:19,40:23, 58:23,59:1, 73:16,73:17 James[1]-2:6 Kraupner[il-2:4 101:9, 101:20 41:2,41:4,41:8, 59:3,59:12, injured[1]-36:1 Jeanette[31- Krysti p]-2:10, leave[3]-7:17, 45:4,46:6,46:9, 59:16,60:22, inspected[1]- 40:7,50:19, 11:11,24:19, 19:18 74:22 47:14,47:22, 69:10,71:22, 55:15 52:8 31:12,51:17, leaving[41-73:8, 48:1,51:24, 73:14,74:8, inspector[1]- Jim[1]-64:18 96:22, 102:22 73:20,73:23, 52:3,53:5,53:7, 89:17 46:21 job[61-49:10, 90:17 53:14,56:1, loan[4]-94:15, instance[i]- 53:10,57:4, L left[1]-23:11 57:14,59:19, 94:22,95:12, 57:6,88:5, 60:5,61:16, 96:15 42:6 W[�] 104:2 legal[1]-8:16 institutions[2]- 88:15 legislation[1]- 64:15,65:23, loans[il-96:9 96:10,96:14 jobs[21- 24:20 56:14, lack[�]-98:21 66:5,66:9, locate[1]-39:6 intelligent(1)- 56:15 lady[1]-53:14 less[2]-10:4, 66:12,66:19, located[31-4:9, Joe[2]-27:8, land[14]-14:4, 67:13,71:2, 19:4,30:16 4elli 14:9,24:11, 3ter[ 72:15,74:2, intelligently[�1- 39:7 letter[z]-11:5, location[1]- Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 113 19:11 mean[14]-29:1, 59:8 MORRIS[1]- 41:10,41:13, 93:17,94:17, locations[1]- 41:14,41:18, Mike[1]-35:15 93:17 41:17,41:22, 94:24,95:3, 51:6 42:23,43:2, mile's[1]-100:3 Morris[1]-93:17 41:23,42:3, 95:16,95:19, look[6]-32:12, 44:7,57:7,65:7, miles[4]-79:2, Morrison[2]- 42:5,43:5, 96:2,96:8, 51:1,70:18, 69:13,71:9, 87:4,93:24, 2:12,24:18 43:14,44:3, 96:13,96:19, 77:4,84:9,91:8 87:6,89:13, 94:5 MORRISON[1]- 44:5,44:7,44:9, 97:16,97:19, looked[2]- 92:10,98:9 MILLER[7]- 24:17 44:14,44:17, 97:21,98:1, 13:13,46:19 means[6]-13:16, 64:18,65:5, most[s]-45:13, 44:19,44:22, 98:2,98:19, looking[5]- 46:22,58:2, 65:11,65:17, 45:16,51:19, 45:10,45:19, 99:4,99:10, 27:12,32:18, 58:5,83:6, 66:1,66:7, 56:9,56:10, 45:23,45:24, 100:15, 102:1, 38:19,61:22, 84:23 66:10 97:12 46:1,46:3, 102:3, 102:14, 73:2 measure[2]- Miller[1]-64:18 mother[1]-26:11 47:23,48:3, 102:21, 103:4, looks[1]-67:13 86:23 million[1]-99:12 motion[s]-3:1, 48:19,51:22, 103:14 low[4]-4:8,5:5, measures[1]- mind[2]-32:3, 3:10,3:18, 52:2,52:4,52:9, MS[63]-8:19, 33:17,58:22 14:8 101:6 101:23, 102:1, 53:6,56:13, 8:23,9:4, 11:12, lower[1]-94:4 mechanism[1]- Minute[1]-2:14 102:10,102:16, 56:20,57:12, 11:18, 14:12, lowest[2]-70:7, 39:10 minutes[3]- 103:13,103:14 57:22,59:1, 16:9,17:2. 81:24 meet[61-16:22, 44:23,44:24, move[5]-4:17, 59:5,59:10, 19:20,23:19, lowlands[1]- 43:19,51:19, 52:14 6:24, 17:13, 59:22,60:7, 24:17,28:4, 11:20 64:8,98:11 misdirection[1]- 48:11,88:22 60:12,60:14, 31:14,34:14, MEETING[1]-1:5 53:18 Moved[1]-102:4 60:19,60:22, 35:5,38:16, M meeting[s]- Miss[1]-97:8 moved[9]-3:3, 61:7,61:20, 39:10,40:6, 34:23,35:6, missed[2]- 3:5,3:20,3:22, 62:7,62:17, 40:15,40:18, ma'am[2]-8:18, 85:12,97:2, 11:17,52:7 24:1,38:10, 63:4,63:7, 40:24,46:8, 94:12 97:14, 101:20, misspoke[1)- 48:24,79:6, 63:10,63:11, 46:10,47:5, mad[1]-92:23 101:21, 102:19, 47:11 94:2 63:13,63:15, 47:11,47:15, main[2]-69:17, 103:19 mistake[1]- moving[4]-6:1, 63:17,63:18, 47:16,48:14, 783 MEMBER(19]- 62:14 9:7, 18:20,26:4 63:21,63:22, 50:3,50:19, major[3]-32:22, 22:17,38:7, mistakenly[1]- MR[217]-3:3, 63:24,64:3, 51:23,52:8, 80:6,87:17 44:21,45:1, 62:9 3:4,3:20,3:21, 64:4,64:12, 53:8,53:15, majority[1]- 53:3,66:17, mm-hum[1]- 4:19,4:22,7:22, 64:14,64:18, 56:3,56:10, 28:24 73:11,75:3, 40:15 8:9,8:12,9:8, 64:22,64:24, 56:19,57:8, MALOHN[2)- 92:7,94:13, mom[1]-5:11 9:11,9:13,9:18, 65:5,65:7, 57:18,57:24, 77:11,78:15 94:21,95:1, money[s]- 12:18, 12:20, 65:11,65:15, 59:3,59:8,Malohn[1]- 95:13,95:17, 14:22,30:13, 13:5,13:8, 65:17,65:20, 59:18,59:21, 77:12 95:24,96:5, 58:11,75:15, 13:11, 14:2, 65:22,66:1, 60:16,60:20, man[1]-58:5 96:11,98:15, 86:11,91:6 14:17, 15:11 66:7,66:10, 61:9,62:2,76:2, Management[1]- 98:17 monitors]-16:6, 15:12, 15:24, 66:21,67:15, 76:7,76:10,4:5 members[4]- 37:13,47:6, 17:1, 17:21, 69:22,69:23, 76:16,81:14, manager[1]- 5:2, 11:4, 19:18, 75:18,75:21, 18:17, 19:13 70:23,70:24, 81:16,86:8, 27:18 29:23 20:14,20:22, 72:5,72:10, 86:19,87:22, 75:24,7:6 72:11,72:12, 99:2,99:6, map[3]-13:14, Menards'[1]- 77:5 77:g 21:10,21:21, 62:4,65:9 77:18 22:7,22:9, 72:14,72:17, 99:16, 101:17, monitored 2,- 73:13,74:14, 102:23, 103:2 maps[2]-13:3, mention - 23:7,55:12, 22:20,23:4, 1 le 5 75 22, : , multi 82:3 33:10 77:20 23:6,25:10, 74: p []- March 1 -1:14 mentioned s - 27:5,27:16, 75:10,76:4, 35:23 [ ] [] monitoring[1s]- mark[3]-19:10, 52:11,52:22, 10:18, 10:20, 27:22,28:14, 76:9,76:13, municipal[1]- 20:21,29:10 96:24,97:5, 28:24,29:4, 77:1,77:11, 16:3 15:20, 16:16, Marlys[1]-2:14 99:24 23:8,30:1,31:1, 29:21,30:19, 78:15,78:18, municipality[1]-massive[1]- met[3]-96:24, 39:24,47:3, 31:6,31:12, 79:23,81:15, 10:1 81:18he 45:16 97:24,98:4 47:19,55:5, 33:3,35:15, [2]-5:16, 84:1 ,83 83:2:2 261, myths match[1]-100:7 method[1]- 55:6,55:10, 36:19,37:1, material[5]- 98:21 56:4 37:16,37:18, 85:20,85:24, 10:21,49:15, Michael[1]-2:3 37:21,37:23, 86:9,86:22, N monitors(2]- 51:12,51:14, microphone[2]- 47:7,47:9 38:9,38:11, 87:9,88:4, 51:15 4:18,46:8 38:13,39:1, 88:20,88:24, name[1 s]-4:21, months[1]- maximum[z]- Midwest[1]- 54:10 39:3,39:8, 89:3,89:24, 8:22, 12:20, 16:11,27:12 18:11 MOORE[2]- 39:14,39:22, 90:4,90:8,90:9, 35:11,41:8, mayor[1]- might[4]-15:13, 71:5,73:13 40:14,40:16, 90:13,90:14, 46:10,48:1, 101:21 48:21,51:7, Moore[1 40:22,41:6, 90:20,91:11, 52:1,52:7, ]-71:5 91:15,92:8, 53:15,60:7, Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 114 64:17,66:21, 40:15,40:18, 42:14,42:15, 60:1,81:6, original[2]-62:3, 40:12,47:17, 74:14,75:10, 40:24,47:5, 46:20,60:9, 85:21, 86:24, 104:17 47:20,75:23, 77:11,90:9, 47:16,48:14, 61:23,83:21, 92:1 ought[4]-54:24, 76:5,76:8, 93:16 50:3,56:10, 84:21,84:24, one[48]-6:2, 55:1,61:4,92:6 76:10,76:16, narrow[]-35:20 60:16,60:20, 98:20 9:15,12:19, ourselves[1]- 76:19 Natural[1]-47:6 61:9,62:2,76:2, numbers p]- 14:15, 18:2, 101:12 pass[3]-67:18, nature[1]-8:16 76:7,76:10, 15:8,32:16, 22:8,23:5, outcome[i]- 69:12,94:23 near[2]-18:12, 76:16,81:14, 32:17,69:14, 25:22,26:3, 104:15 passed[4]-8:4, 93:4 81:16,86:8, 100:4, 100:6, 27:6,34:22, overseeing[1]- 10:6,24:20, nearest[ ]-71:3 86:19,87:22, 100:10 35:18,42:14, 56:9 24:24 necessary[5]- 99:2,99:6, nursing[ij- 45:5,47:23, oversees[1]- passes[3]-3:10, 6:23, 15:16, 99:16, 101:17, 100:19 47:24,48:20, 56:8 102:10, 103:13 20:23,34:11 102:23, 103:2 49:1,49:7,54:7, overweight[3]- passionate[i]- 44:15 nobody[2]-31:8, O 55:7,55:20, 16:15, 16:19, 73:24 need[1o]-7:2, 66:5 57:18, 57:24, 16:21 past[3]-26:9, 12:13,39:6, noise[3]-25:9, Oak[3]-35:16, 60:9,61:19, own[6]-47:19, 88:14,89:2 40:7,53:10, 42:21,79:5 53:16,97:10 63:1,63:8, 52:4,57:12, path[2]-33:12, 73:21,79:19, non[71-11:21, Oaks[3]-39:23, 64:17,64:23, 60:13,60:14, 48:4 98:6, 101:5, 24:9,24:22, 54:6,93:3 65:11,65:17, 84:11 Paul[1]-77:11 103:4 25:3,25:5,26:1, obey[1]-84:16 66:2,67:22, Owner[1]-4:6 Pavilion[30]- needed[l]- 73:14 objection[1]- 68:1,69:8, owner p]-50:9, 4:10,5:15, 89:19 non- 103:1 77:23,77:24, 50:14,97:6 60:15,60:17, needs[2]-26:5, combustible[1] objective[2]- 83:21, 84:14, owners[1]- 71:6,71:7,71:8, 35:12 -11:21 47:18,76:19 89:13,92:17, 18:14 71:10,71:11, negative[2]- non- obligated[5]- 94:2,96:17, 71:13,71:15, 21:19,21:22 contaminated 15:2,49:13, 96:18,99:10, P 74:15,75:11, negligence[l]- [4]-24:9,24:22, 50:12,50:13, 100:15 77:12,77:16, 31:3 25:3,25:5 64:10 One[1]-4:7 p.m[i]-1:15 78:5,81:6, neighbor[1]- non-issue[1]- obligation[3]- One-Family? ]- pace[1]-28:6 81:23,82:9, 91:19 26:1 14:22,49:8, 4:7 packaged[1]- 82:23,83:5, neighbors[3]- non-PUD[i]- 50:8 ones[3]-7:18, 32:7 85:5,85:6,85:9, 46:23,54:7, 73:14 obligations[1]- 31:6,87:24 packet[2]-7:23, 85:13,90:5, 83:9 none[4]-83:2, 65:16 ongoing[']- 96:23 91:16,91:19, never[7]-12:7, 84:8,97:18, obligatory[1]- 62:20 Page[1]-61:24 98:14 44:19,80:12, 97:19 19:16 open[1]-66:3 Pages[1]-104:7 pay[3]-65:13, 80:15,90:11, None[i]-73:15 observant[i]- opened[l]- paid[3]-90:12, 96:1,96:3 95:20,98:16 normal[1]-21:15 54:12 40:16 96:4,96:7 paying[5]-61:4, new[9]-24:20, north[2]-22:10, observe[1]-15:3 operated[1]- panels[2]-13:3, 65:19,86:11, 48:7,48:12, 71:8 obviously[1]- 19:24 13:14 100:22, 100:23 48:15,74:4, northeast[1]-4:9 7:13 operation[2]- paperwork[2]- PC[3]-3:19,4:4, 79:19,79:20, not..[1]-29:3 odds[1]-100:18 37:2,50:11 55:14,55:19 102:18 83:24,95:14 notes[3]-9:4, OF[3]-1:2, operations[1]- parcel[3]-5:6, PC2011[1]- next[1 4]-19:5, 96:20, 104:9 104:1, 104:2 27:11 12:2, 14:4 102:13 39:19,46:6, Nothing[1]- off-site[2]-6:24, opinion[2]- parenthetically peak[4]-36:19, 54:9,73:3,73:5, 73:15 19:11 19:14, 87:2 [1]-10:14 36:21,44:2, 79:10,80:18, nothing[9]-7:22, offers[1]-79:8 opportunity[1]- part[lo]-5:22, 46:2 80:19,87:13, 44:10,44:13, oil[4]-29:9, 5:9 14:3,14:18, pedestrian[1]- 87:14,90:7, 76:23,80:5, 29:13,29:14, opposed[4]-3:8, 34:12,34:19, 21:15 98:18, 102:19 86:19,86:21, 29:19 4:1, 102:8, 38:23,58:7, people[13]-5:8, Nick[i]-74:14 87:6,89:12 old[2]-74:19, 103:11 71:17,76:22, 15:19,23:16, Noble[3]-2:10, notice p]-97:22 95:19 order[81-6:9, 76:23 36:1,48:24, 96:22,97:8 noticed[1]-7:11 OLSON[1]- 6:20,6:21,7:2, particular[6)- 50:21,54:19, NOBLE[41]- number[25]-5:7, 15:11 10:4, 10:11, 7:1, 10:15,33:7, 67:18,77:13, 11:12, 11:18, 5:8,5:16,7:11, Oly[2]-52:2, 33:21,33:24 33:10,33:23, 79:6,81:5,93:9, 14:12, 16:9, 9:15, 12:16, 52:4 orderly[4]-6:21, 34:14 98:20 17:2, 19:20, 13:19, 17:17, on-site[5]- 15:16,21:23, parties[2]- per[71-16:23, 23:19,28:4, 20:6,22:19, 15:19,27:18, 33:22 104:13, 104:14 16:24, 17:2, 31:14,34:14, 25:22,26:23, 55:13,56:4, ordinance[4]- partner[i]-95:22 27:9,36:20, 35:5,38:16, 28:9,31:5, 56:12 11:18, 19:17, parts[1]-71:10 84:22,89:18 39:10,40:6, 34:11,38:3, once[6]-48:19, 20:3,33:19 party[1o]-23:22, percent[2]- Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 115 38:15,56:24 68:1 98:8 prepared(1]- 29:15,30:5 68:6,70:20, perhaps(1]-8:15 pits[1]-11:20 pointing[1]- 90:22 professional[3]- 71:11,71:22, period[,]-18:2 place[8]-22:5, 96:18 PRESENT[2]- 12:23, 13:12, 72:19,73:7, permit[20]-4:14, 25:8,25:24, points(3]-38:21, 2:1,2:9 43:1 73:19,78:5, 9:16, 12:16, 26:20,27:21, 79:13 present[1]- profit[2]-58:6, 79:24,80:18, 13:20, 17:4, 65:4,74:24, poison[1]-87:12 17:22 91:4 91:6,91:7,96:1, 17:6, 19:9, 104:10 policy[i]-99:6 presented[11- program pi- 97:6,97:23, 19:16,22:15, placed[4]-11:1, pollution[2]- 61:22 100:1 98:16,98:18, 31:17,31:19, 11:6, 19:2, 25:9,42:21 presently[1]- project[36]- 100:17 38:24,50:15, 28:17 Pollution(1)- 48:8 10:18, 13:2, proportionate[1] 60:11,65:2, placing[4]-6:2, 48:8 preserve pi- 15:15, 15:21, -99:17 65:24,71:18, 6:4,26:4,63:9 ponds[4]-70:16, 22:6,22:11, 17:18, 18:15, proportionately 71:24,73:22, plain[1]-94:16 70:19,92:10 68:12 19:10,24:14, [1]-100:6 74:24 PLAN[1]-1:5 pool[3]-82:22, Preserve[1]- 27:4,27:7, proposed[3]- permits[3]- Plan[12]-6:5, 82:24,83:16 22:4 27:10,27:18, 48:9,84:5,97:2 16:19, 16:21, 8:1, 10:10, Poplar[1]-32:16 president[1]- 27:19,28:1, protect[3]-25:4, 100:13 21:24,39:11, portion p]- 35:16 28:5,28:7, 25:6,25:24 permitted[4]- 40:20,42:9, 103:19 pretend[9]-15:8 28:12,28:19, protected(1]- 12:4,20:1; 55:1,73:22, portions[2]-4:9, pretty[2]-91:2, 34:9,35:18, 46:15 43:19,51:14 96:20,97:3, 32:15 93:4 36:12,39:13, protecting[1]- person[4]-45:5, 102:19 Portions(1]- previous[2]- 47:19,50:23, 25:1 52:6,94:17, plan(8]-6:6, 85:18 21:24,62:11 50:24,55:2, protection[5]- 98:10 12:6, 17:13, pose[1]-88:5 previously[2]- 56:8,56:15, 17:20,23:2, personally[i]- 34:16,43:8, posing[i]-88:6 7:6,8:1 57:10,59:4, 29:19,31:10, 87:5 43:10,62:13 position[1]- primarily[1]- 60:23,76:24, 100:14 perspective[2]- planned[1]-70:2 74:23 97:4 87:23, 88:2, protections[3]- 9:20,11:14 Planning[51-6:7, possible[3]- private[3]-23:2, 89:8,90:17 22:5,25:8,29:8 pesticides[1]- 19:14,43:16, 46:15,51:2, 25:24,31:11 projects[lo]- protein[1]-62:22 23:15 64:9 89:20 problem[6]- 4:12,28:12, prove[1]-68:16 petition[4]-11:3, planning[6]- possibly[4]- 15:13,51:7, 28:13,29:3, provide p]- 29:23,42:4, 8:14, 11:4, 17:10,36:4, 57:9,82:4, 36:13,40:2, 23:12,32:1, 50:15 29:23,29:24, 37:7,47:18 91:22, 102:22 56:17,56:21, 49:8,49:14, petitioner[4]- 59:15,88:16 post(2]-14:22, problematic[1]- 95:7,95:8 55:18,58:2, 4:17,7:21, plans[7]-31:18, 16:6 48:21 proof[i]-55:17 98:7 11:23,31:23 84:8,89:11, post-weight(i]- problems[1]- proper[2]-77:3, provided[1]- Petitioner[1]- 98:7,99:9, 16:6 78:8 102:15 14:8 4:5 100:10, 100:14 posted(3]-16:6, proceed[1]- properties[2]- providing[i]- petitioner's[1]- plant[1]-50:1 16:7, 16:10 100:11 51:18,52:5 50:8 5:3 plat(1]-34:18 poster[1]-67:13 Proceedings[1]- Properties(s]- provision(1]- petroleum[9]- platted[1]-18:10 postulate[1]- 104:7 4:6, 14:21, 51:12 29:15 plenty[1]-28:17 43:3 proceedings[2]- 25:14,27:17, PUBLIC p]-1:6 PEZA(1]-56:22 plots[i]-70:18 pot[1]-53:22 103:17, 104:5 39:4 Public p]-56:10 Phil[i]-45:10 plotted(i]-70:22 potential[2]- process[15]- property[54]- public[28]-3:2, PHILLIPS[3]- plugged[i]-78:3 36:8,40:17 6:11, 14:4, 11:19, 13:15, 4:4. 11:24, 27:16,28:24, plummeting[1]- potholes(2]- 24:11,25:15, 13:17, 13:18, 16:13, 16:14, 39:8 21:18 85:9,86:1 32:11,33:21, 14:8, 17:24, 17:6,20:23, phone p]-46:20 plus[3]-28:1, pounds[3]- 38:24,43:22, 18:14, 18:16, 20:24,21:7, phonetic[2]- 89:8,89:9 16:11, 16:23, 58:4,61:13, 18:19, 19:5, 29:8,32:20, 97:7,100:1 podium[z]-4:18, 84:22 72:23,73:3, 21:18,21:20, 37:10,37:11, photos[1]-72:7 35:14 practiced[1]- 73:4,73:5, 22:10,23:15, 46:15,78:18, pickup[q-54:8 Point[1]-70:6 95:21 100:12 28:11,31:10, 86:17,97:4, picture p]-82:7 point(1 s]-12:7, practices[1]- Prochaska(1)- 34:7,34:11, 97:21,98:6, pictures[z]- 20:3,25:1, 22:16 2:5 34:13,34:14, 98:8,99:19, 85:6,94:6 38:17,46:3, practicing[1]- PROCHASKA[e] 46:12,50:9, 99:20, 101:23, piece[1]-71:22 61:9,70:5, 95:20 -3:3,3:21,9:8, 50:14,52:6, 102:1, 102:5, pinned[2]- 79:16,79:21, preliminary[4]- 102:3, 102:14, 57:13,59:2, 102:18, 103:18 54:18,54:22 81:24,87:8, 12:6,34:17, 103:14 59:14,60:10, PUD[2]-71:19, pipe[3]-67:24, 87:9,89:23, 50:24,51:4 production(z]- 60:13,60:14, 73:14 68:3,68:14 95:3,95:22 62:21 63:6 62:1,62:6, Puerto( ]-96:2 preparation[�]- , 63:20, pipes[2]-67:9, pointed[2]-98:3, 61:11 products[2]- 63:16, pull[t]-30:10 Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 116 pulled[1]-68:18 74:16,87:19, 12:10,78:3 10:21, 15:4, 90:10 17:13 purchased[21- 88:22,94:11, rebuild[1]-99:12 18:6,44:1 residential[25]- revisit[11-80:9 60:12,91:1 96:12,97:3, received[1)- relative[z]-38:3, 7:3,9:17,9:23, Rico[1)-96:2 purchasing(1]- 98:5,98:7, 26:11 38:13 10:5, 10:11, rid[1]-88:16 91:3 98:24, 101:10 recognize[21- relocate[1]- 14:3, 14:15, rider[1]-93:11 purely[1]-80:3 quick[2]-60:9, 35:10,67:11 44:12 17:22, 18:1, right-of-way 11]- purpose[1]-91:8 98:23 recommend(al- relocations[1]- 18:8, 18:23, 37:10 push[1)-40:1 quicker[1]- 8:4,69:11, 27:23 19:1,20:2,20:5, River[sl-14:6, Put(32]-5:17, 48:12 69:15,69:18 remember[s]- 24:2,24:10, 20:12,28:12, 10:13, 13:14, quite[a]-17:23, recommendatio 16:12,22:23, 32:7,33:15, 33:13,70:7 17:9,21:19, 58:17,93:20, n[71-25:16, 26:2,34:24, 39:16,51:18, river[3]-38:11, 23:15,23:16, 94:20 25:17,28:4, 92:6 51:21,61:12, 68:10,92:4 25:13,37:12, 35:1,64:11, removing[1]- 64:6,80:4,80:5 Rivers[41-16:2, 37:23,38:1, R 66:15, 101:14 26:3 residents(7)- 60:8,96:19, 42:4,49:15, recommendatio repair[2)-32:17, 25:8,54:4,97:1, 97:9 53:12,59:23, R1[3]-64:6,64:7 ns[a]-7:23, 100:5 97:5,97:9, R2[10]-4:7,9:16, Road(so]-1:10, 59:24,62:9, 25:20,38:20, repeat(1 -3:14 97:24 4:6,4:10,5:14, 65:12,67:3, 10:11, 11:19, 69:17 repeats[ ]- Resources[ 1- 14:21, 15:4, 69:1,69:13, 12:11,33:24, record[a)-4:21, 74:17 47:6 15:5, 15:7, 70:12,70:19, 34:1,64:5, 93:16,93:23, Report[1]-104:7 respect[s]-7:19, 16:10,20:9, 70:20,79:2, 70:17 102:12 reported[1]- 15:22,28:15, 20:12,20:13, 89:15,97:12, R2/ag[1]-27:1 recorded[1)- 104:5 28:23,43:15, 20:19,21:8, 98:24,99:7, radar[1]-94:6 22:24 Reporter[11- 63:4 25:14,27:16, 101:11 railroad[sl- recyclable]1)- 104:4 respectfully[11- 28:12,28:13, put..[1]-70:23 22:11,67:5, 30:13 represent[2]- 44:17 28:21,32:15, puts[11-50:23 67:6,68:12, recycle[1]-58:11 62:17,96:9 respond[1]- 35:19,38:4, 70:11 putting[s]- recycled[2]- representative[1] 11:12 38:11,39:4, 20:12,59:15, rain[1]-92:5 63:10,63:14 -50:5 response[7]- 53:20,60:15, 63:6,70:15, rainfall[1]-68:17 red[1)-39:20 representatives 3:9,4:2,27:14, 60:18,69:6, 72:1,73:13, rains[3]-69:8, redid[1]-62:14 [1]-90:21 56:1, 102:9, 70:6,71:8, 73:16,74:19, 78:13,83:17 reference[3]- represents[1]- 103:7, 103:12 71:10,77:14, 91:5 raise[s]-3:13, 67:19,67:21, 96:13 responses[1]- 77:16,78:5, 8:21,35:9,65:3, 70:1 reproduced[1]- 7:24 78:6,81:6,82:9, Q 83:10 referred[1]-67:5 104:20 responsibility[2) 85:2,85:4,85:5, raising(1]-73:18 referring[21- requesting[11- -19:8, 104:20 85:6,85:9, qualifications(1] ran[z]-56:14, 69:9 72:21 4:7 rest[1)-51:15 85:13,90:5, -43:20 92:2 regard[41-42:16, require[s]- restate[2)- 91:16,91:21, quality[a)-24:2, randomly[1]- 42:20,42:22, 31:19,55:1, 48:20,94:20 92:21,93:21, 33:2,33:4,34:5 93:19 43:6 55:13,58:13, restoration[2)- 100:2 quantifiable(1)- Randy[1)-75:10 regarding[a)- 58:16 17:17,27:1 road(39]-15:3, 41:18 rather[2)-74:23, 13:2,13:14, required[12]- restrict[1]-17:6 16:1, 16:8, quantify(1]- 77:19 25:8,26:9 6:11, 10:24, restricted[21- 16:10, 16:11, 41:19 reach[1)-97:6 regularly[31- 14:20, 15:3, 54:20,54:23 16:13, 16:14, q ua [a]-45:17, reaching[1)- 21:8,21:11, 15:6,28:16, restriction[1]- 16:21, 18:20, 60:1,60:3,60:4 97:1 102:19 30:7,31:24, 60:16 20:11,20:20, questionable[3]- read[3]-9:1, 21:4,21:14, 33:2,34:4, regulated[1]- 38:22,40:6, resurface[1)- 20:8,48:5 51:13 41:20,54:23 32:14 28:11,29:9, 46:19 read (1]-9:14 29:16,30:9, y regulation[1]- requirement[s]- resurfacing[z]- questions[36]- real[al-31:24, 46:18 34:1,95:10, 100:2, 100:3 32:3,32:20, 5:8,5:18,5:20, 37:22,72:6, 32:22,34:9, 7:9,7:12,7:24, regulations[2]- 95:15,95:21, retain[1]-70:20 78:8 36:7,37:12, 8:5,8:7,8:15, 48:7,57:21 96:15,99:2 retention C1)- realize[1]-15:14 37:17,37:20, 8:24,9:2, 11:16, reiterate[1]- requirements(3] 70:16 really[12]-35:20, 101:15 -12:12,64:5, retired[1]-95:4 41:15,45:16, 22:23,26:17, 36:1,43:21, 95:11 return z 49:22,59:23, 26:18,26:19, reiteration[1)- [ ]-4:13, 46:17,58:13, 65:4,70:1, 31:15, 34:22, 61:10 research[1)- 31:11 58:18,69:18, 72:18,77:22, 35:8,43:24, related[s]-7:12, 62:15 reverse[1)-3:1 B 77:4,78:20, 92:3,92:18, 47:23,48:20, 52:12,83:22, researched[2)- revert(1)-27:4 81:19,83:14, 92:19,99:13, 54:19,55:7, 83:24, 104:12, 13:2,68:4 review[2]-38:24, 87.1 104:13 resident[31- 48:8 99:19,99:20 60:9,66:13, reason[3]-7:16, roads(3]-14:15, relates(a)- 12:22,56:7, reviewing[1]- Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 117 67:3,94:18 save[1]-8:5 41:5,49:10, 30:21 33:23,34:1, sort[3]-43:13, roadway[9]- Savoree[1]- 50:6,60:6,72:6, shirt[3]-39:20, 34:2,38:23, 78:24,79:5 4:12, 14:24, 45:10 102:3, 102:20, 61:17,77:9 39:5,39:9, sorts[1]-19:3 17:7,21:2,23:9, SAVOREE[19]- 102:21 shirts[1]-61:18 43:21,49:9, sounds[2]- 31:16,35:22, 27:18,27:22, seconded(3)- short p]-70:10, 49:14,50:9, 66:10,70:1 51:3,54:11 44:19,44:22, 3:5,3:22, 102:4 75:14,75:15, 51:1,51:10, sources[1]-51:2 role[2]-76:18, 45:10,45:23, secondly(1]- 78:17,79:14 52:17,55:13, south[1]-70:20 76:21 46:1,56:13, 55:11 shortchanging 56:4,56:12, southeast[1]- Ron[z]-93:15, 56:20,57:12, Section[2]-4:14 [1]-59:9 57:6,61:11, 4:10 93:17 57:22,59:1, security[3]- Shorthand[i]- 65:1,66:24, space[z]-45:15, room(2]-57:6, 59:5,59:10, 17:9, 17:15, 104:4 79:10,81:8 82:21 101:3 59:22,63:10, 99:8 shorthand[2]- sites[5]-26:9, speaker[1]-48:4 ROSS[5]-60:7, 63:13,90:13, sediment[3]- 104:5, 104:9 29:12,42:22, special(27)- 60:14,60:19, 94:17 14:7,22:13, show(z]-67:18, 52:20,57:4 4:13,5:4,7:10, 60:22,61:7 saw[ ]-33:10, 31:18 67:23 sitting[1]-101:2 9:15,11:22, Ross[1]-60:8 46:18,81:10, sedimentation[1] showing(1]- situation(a]- 12:13, 19:9, roughly[1]-70:6 81:21,82:2, -100:14 67:17 10:16, 17:11, 19:16, 19:20, Route[26]-6:22, 82:18,97:13 see[21]-5:10, shows[2]-62:5, 35:20,47:17 20:1,29:5, 6:23, 10:19, schedule[11- 8:7,8:18, 11:17, 87:17 six(1]-18:13 39:12.40:19. 10:22,20:24, 27:21 35:11,36:1, shut[2]-69:5, sliding[1]-53:18 43:18,51:12, 27:19,28:5, scheduled[1]- 41:1,55:8, 71:10 small[21-31:21, 53:12,64:5, 28:18,28:19, 102:19 55:13,55:19, shy[1]-87:20 37:17 64:8,64:9, 28:20,29:1, SCHNELLER[12] 67:19,68:21, side[1]-85:10 smaller[1]-54:8 71:18,71:24, 29:12,36:12, -41:6,41:10, 69:3,78:13, sides[2]-52:5, smoking[q- 73:4,73:22, 39:6,39:9, 41:17,41:23, 81:5,84:7,85:5, 80:19 53:22 74:24,88:3, 39:13,40:14, 42:5,43:5,44:3, 92:19, 100:10 sidewalks[3]- so..(z]-53:13, 100:12 44:12,52:18, 44:7,44:14, seem[3]-66:2, 35:18,36:7, 59:2 specialize[1]- 52:24,53:10, 45:19,45:24, 66:3 37.21 soil[23]-4:11, 69:15 54:20,55:2, 46:3 select[1]-93:19 signage[1]- 11:9, 11:21, specific i5i- 69:16,70:6 Schneller[1]- sell[2]-17:24, 38.22 23:24,24:1, 17:13,43:7, row[4]-41:5, 41:11 18:1 signed[1]- 24:2,25:9, 43:10,46:4, 60:6,61:17, school[2]-21:8, send[1]-66:14 104:18 29:14,29:17, 55:20 64:16 36:6 sense[1]-72:3 signify[3]-3:6, 31:18,32:6, specifically[3]- run[121-8:6, SCHULTZ[25]- sent[1]-5:11 102:6, 103:9 33:2,33:4,34:6, 10:7,32:23, 8:17,11:16, 12:20, 13:5, separation(1]- Silver[1]-72:22 39:13,40:9, 64:7 15:8,30:23, 13:8, 13:11, 24:8 simply[a]-5:18, 40:10,46:16, speculation[1]- 70:10,73:10, 14:2,15:24, serious[2]- 6:1,9:22, 18:17 46:24,75:20, 68:5 89:18,93:2, 17:1,22:9, 54:13,83:14 single[1]-98:9 76:20, 100:14 speed[3]-93:23, 93:7, 101:21 22:20,23:6, seriously[1]- sit[2]-13:9, soils[6]-24:9, 94:4,94:9 run-off[1]-73:10 27:5,30:19, 14:22 101:13 25:3,25:4, speeding[1]- running[z]-54:5, 37:1,37:18, set[7)-10:9, site[67]-4:9,6:5, 30:23,40:4 94:7 69:3 62:7,64:24, 19:17,27:9, 6:9,6:10,6:14, sold[3]-30:15, spends[1]-56:8 runs[2]-68:11, 65:7,65:15, 27:10,48:7, 6:24,7:1,7:10, 32:7,60:10 spent[1]-54:9 92:4 65:20,72:5, 88:2, 105:2 7:12, 11:2, 11:7, solution[2]- spread(1]-6:18 72:11,72:14, setting[1]-28:6 12:5, 12:9, 57:15 spring(1]-71:9 S 72:17,97:21, settle[1]-82:14 15:19, 17:4, someone[2]- springs[2]- 98:2 seven[3]-19:7, 17:13, 18:3, 32:4,55:13 68:23,68:24 safe[1]-21:15 Schultz[6]-8:13, safeguards � - 29.11,48:22 18:7,18:22, sometimes[1]- springtime[�]- 9 [] 12:21, 13:11, several[a]- 19:3, 19:5, 93:22 69:6 25:12 96:23,97:13, 35:17,91:17, 19:11,22:2, somewhere[7]- SS[1]-104:1 safer[1]-21:15 97:19 97:24,98:1 22:5,22:15, 14:1,55:8, SSA[1]-34:19 safety[a]-21:7, scientific(1]- sewer[t]-59:24 22:21,24:4, 59:11,59:13, SSA's[1]-34:12 29:8,37:11, 59:6 sewers[1]-71:20 25:5,25:14, 65:10,67:9, Staff[a]-7:23, 54:6 SCOTT[5]- shall[1]-8:5 25:18,26:5, 6919 25:20,32:10, SALLE[1]-104:2 75:10,76:4, share[1]-9:6 27:18,28:17, sorry[11]-13:5, 102:24 sample[1]-23:24 76:9,76:13, shared(2]-16:3, 28:19, 30:7, 13:8,40:23, staff[41-47:19, sampling(1]- 77:1 100:1 30:10,30:21, 41:10,52:3, 75:22,76:22, 51:16 Scott[1]-75:10 sheets[2]-8:4, 30:22,33:1, 52:7,59:21, 77:3 satisfy[2]-19:17, second[11]-3:4, 55:17 33:3,33:10, 62:13,76:9, Staff's[1]-28:4 32:21 3:21,25:22, shipped[1]- 33:14,33:20, 93:17,94:19 stage[2]-34:15, Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 118 34:17 65:1,78:7,86:5 sudden(1)-93:3 105:1 track[8]-21:9, 36:18,36:22, stand[s)-3:13, stone[4)-45:18, sue[3]-78:11, testing[1]-77:3 54:5,89:10, 37:11, 37:16, 8:20,8:21, 59:23,60:4 80:24,81:1 thawing(1)-69:7 92:23,93:1, 38:3,38:22, 35:10,46:23 stop[1]-77:15 suggests[1]- THE[3]-13:4, 93:5,93:8 40:9,41:20, standard[4]- storage(1]-51:8 19:4 97:15,97:18 tracks[8]-22:11, 42:10,44:15, 15:10,51:20, stored[s]-63:17 suit(2)-104:13, themselves', 67:5,67:6,67:7, 44:16,44:20, 54:3,99:3 storm[1]-69:7 104:14 86:13 67:10,68:12, 45:2,45:16, standards[17]- strain(1]-20:13 suitable[1]-7:1 therefore[3)- 70:11,70:13 46:2,46:24, 11:7, 11:10, stream[2]- Suite[1]-5:1 10:23,41:23, traditional(1)- 53:21,54:2, 19:15,22:13, 20:10,20:19 summarize[1]- 64:8 14:9 55:12,58:13, 24:6,24:7, street[5)-31:19, 84:3 thereof[2]- traffic[32]-14:14, 58:15,59:22, 24:12,24:16, 31:21,64:20, summer[1)- 104:15, 104:18 16:13,20:13, 59:24,77:16, 25:12,25:19, 82:13,99:1 24:13 thereupon[1]- 21:2,35:21, 77:18,83:15, 29:5,30:17, streets[1]-71:20 sun's[1)-93:4 3:16 38:1,38:15, 83:22,83:24, 34:7,48:12, strictly[4]- supposed fP)- they've[2]-75:4, 41:7,41:11, 84:9,84:10, 48:15,48:18, 36:11,39:2, 53:24 92:3 41:14,41:24, 84:12,84:14, 51:17 52:12,55:2 surface[2]-8:7, thinks(1)-3:12 42:6,42:7,44:1, 84:24,89:18, standing[1)- stringent[1]- 100:5 third[9)-23:22, 44:3,44:10, 93:18 78:17 51:19 swayed[1)-66:2 40:12,47:17, 44:13,46:4, true[5]-67:2, start(4]-35:13, students[1]- sworn[1]-3:16 47:20,76:5, 60:21,61:14, 83:19,94:14, 40:2,78:4, 54:4 Sykes(1]-97:7 76:8,76:10, 84:15,85:2, 94:22, 104:8 86:24 studies[8)- 76:16,76:19 85:4,86:1, trusting[1]- started[3)- 42:20,42:22, T third-party[9]- 89:14,89:16, 55:22 27:24,34:23, 43:1,43:12, 23:22,40:12, 89:19,92:18, try[2]-79:14, 90:11 46:4,52:10, T.J[1)-61:20 47:17,47:20, 92:22,93:13 80:14 STATE[1]-104:1 57:4,70:24 tackle[2]-9:18, 76:5,76:8, train[1)-70:13 trying[6]-48:11, state[l 9)-4:21, study[14)-13:16, 23:4 76:10,76:16, transcript[2]- 61:2,66:12, 8:21, 10:1, 41:12,41:14, TACO(3]-24:5, 76:19 104:9, 104:18 84:1,84:2, 12:12, 16:11, 41:24,42:1, 51:17,51:20 three[4)-13:20, Transportation 93:21 23:23,35:10, 42:6,42:7, Taker[1]-2:14 60:9,65:10, [s)-10:17, turn[1]-94:12 35:11,37:15, 42:15,42:18, tank[1)-49:2 98:2 15:15, 15:18, turnout(1]- 45:9,47:19, 44:13,45:3, tanks[1]-51:8 throughout[1]- 34:9,56:7 97:16 48:1,72:16, 50:22,89:16 tantamount(2)- 48:23 trash(1)-52:16 two[21)-12:16, 73:9,76:18, stuff[6]-40:1, 32:6,61:11 throwing[1]- travel(2]-15:5, 18:2,27:6, 86:8,95:7, 52:20,75:20, taxed[i]-18:5 46:5 93:21 27:12,28:1, 100:2, 101:20 75:24,77:4, taxes(2)-100:23 thrown[1]-92:1 tread[1]-99:19 42:15,45:15, State[8]-4:12, 79:5 team(g)-21:9, Timber[1]-78:7 tree[1]-94:2 52:5,55:7, 24:6,24:20, stupid[1]-61:3 54:5,92:23, today[10]-23:11, trees[2]-91:24, 61:18,63:7, 24:24,56:21, subcontractors 93:5,93:8 23:17,80:10, 94:1 63:8,65:14, 75:13,76:2 [3)-57:19, tear[21-32:4, 84:15,85:3, trellis[1]-72:19 69:16,72:8, statement[3]- 57:20,57:22 77:22 85:4,85:13, trenches - 77:12,79:2, 20:15,53:2, subdivision[17)- technically[1]- 86:1,86:2, 59:24 89:7,89:8,93:8, 65:12 6:17,7:5, 10:5, 25:5 86:23 tributary[1]- 94:11 statements[1)- 19:4,33:19, Ted[1]-41:10 Tom[s]-2:2, 72:19 two-year[4]- 66:23 35:19,35:24, temporarily[1)- 47:22,48:3, tried[1]-79:23 18:2,27:12, station(1]-29:12 39:16,43:7, 4:8 70:4,96:19 trips[4]-42:10, 28:1,63:8 stations[2)- 46:11,67:1, temporary p ry[1]- tonight[l 1]-5:3, 54:17,60:23 type[7]-12:4, 48:22,51:7 68:19,71:19, 97:2 7:10,7:15, truck[18l-14:14, 12:13, 19:12, stay[3]-16:7, 73:15,93:9, ten[s)-36:4, 43:17,43:23, 16:16,26:4, 46:18,47:7, 51:18,92:10 97:10,97:23 38:2,44:23, 53:17,75:12, 42:10,44:24, 50:10,60:21 steady[2]-20:9, subdivisions[4]- 44:24,90:24 89:5,90:11, 54:8,55:14, Tyson's[1]-92:9 20:19 5:14,5:15, terms(1]-38:15 90:15,90:17 55:19,69:10, stenographer(1] 70:21,85:21 test[s)-75:20, took[2]-26:20, 71:21,73:14, U -45:5 subject[1]-62:1 87:17,94:16, 85:21 74:8,84:18, step(2]-73:3, submitted[1]- 94:23 top[1]-49:3 84:22,93:18 uncontaminated 73:4 62:12 tested[7]-10:23, tossed[1]-54:9 trucker[1]-94:9 [1]-4:11 still[10]-22:12, subsurface[1]- 10:24,21:12, total[1]-45:14 trucks[44]- under[151-43:18, 34:11,34:15, 51:6 30:2,30:16, touch(1]-37:7 20:10,20:20, 48:61 48:8, 49:8,56:21, Subtitle[1 I- 34:5,55:20 town[4]-48:24, 21:1,33:11, 56:22,64:6, 56:22,63:7, 51:13 testimony[1)- 93:1,93:24 35:21,36:4, 74:12,81:9, 81:22,82:6, Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 119 82:9,82:19, 71:15,74:10, walked(1]-33:6 wet[1]-92:10 Yorkville[28]- 83:7, 104:19, 74:12,77:10, walking I2]-36:6, whatsoever[2]- 1:11,4:15,6:2, 104:21 77:17,77:18, 92:19 83:2,84:8 6:3,6:6,6:21, underground(2]- 77:22,78:3, wall(2]-46:5, whereof[1]- 10:10, 10:19, 49:2,51:8 78:7,78:17, 63:11 105:1 12:21, 12:22, underhanded[1] 83:2,91:20, wants[3]-39:11, White[6]-35:16, 15:17, 16:3, -91:9 92:11,93:3, 50:10,79:17 39:23,53:16, 18:9,21:18, underlying[1]- 99:7, 100:9, warned[1]-88:9 54:6,93:3, 26:4,26:6, 12:12 101:21 washers[1]- 97:10 61:21,61:23, underneath[3]- usable(1]-24:10 91:24 whole[2]-74:6, 77:19,79:8, 67:7,67:9, usage[1]-41:15 waste[1]-75:18 81:24 80:17,80:21, 70:12 user(1]-99:21 watch[1]-46:23 wider[1]-54:3 81:1,86:12, understood[2]- uses[5]-4:13, watching[2]- wild[2]-59:6, 89:15,90:10, 74:2,74:3 19:21, 19:23, 54:11,76:15 59:7 95:8,98:10 undeveloped[1]- 24:6,29:6 water[30]-25:1, willing[1]-17:9 Yorkville's[1]- 18:10 utility[1]-27:23 25:4,25:6,25:9, win[1]-31:6 21:24 unfortunate[1]- 42:19,67:8, winds[1)-67:23 Young[1]-2:14 90:18 V 67:10,67:22, wiped[1]-93:5 yourself[2]- UNIDENTIFIED 68:2,68:7, wish[3]-4:17, 58:11,59:9 valid[1]-55:4 [1s]-22:17, 68:11,68:20, 82:7,85:5 38:7,44:21, valuable[1]- 69:2 69:19 witness[1]- Z 45:1,53:3, 18:21 70:10,70:21, 80:10 66:17,73:11, value[1]-30:15 78:6,81:9, witnessed[1]- ZE : ,9 [6]- 75:3,92:7, values[5]-18:16, 81:22,82:6, 81:6 96:1919,9 97:19,98:1,7:1, 94:13,94:21, 19:5.21:18, 82:9,82:12, witnesses(1]- 95:1,95:13, 21:20,31:10 82:19,82:22, 3:15 98:19,99:4, 95:17,95:24, various[1]-58:3 83:3,83:7, 99:10, [i]- 96:5,96:11, vehicle[6]- wondered[1]- Z96:19 [1]- 83:17,92:9 5:12 98:15,98:17 16:21, 17:2, Weaver 1 -2:6 96:19 [] wonderful[1]- unimproved[1]- 17:7,21:14, WEAVER[3]- 86:11 Zone(1]-13:15 18:19 21:16 3:4, 102:1, words[1]-27:3 zoned[5]-9:16, unit[1]-17:1 vehicles[1]-15:5 102:21 14:2, 19:11, Works[1]-56:11 United(2)-4:15, verify[1]-55:14 Wednesday[1]- world[1]-62:21 33:23,42:24 10:9 versus(1]- 1:14 worry[1;-92:12 Zoning(5]-6:7, UNITED[1]-1:2 100:23 week[1 -85:7 worse ]-77:22 19:14,43:16, University[2]- view[3]-21:21, weeks I1]-37:7 worth[1]-100:3 43:17,64:9 68:5,70:3 21:22,24:3 weighed[1]- zoning[16]-7:3, 3 village wrapped[1]- unknown[3]- 9 []-65:13, 93:1 g 94:1 10:11, 11:4, 33:2,33:4,33:5 65:18,65:19 weight[3]-16:6, writing(1]-57:9 11:18, 12:12, unless[1]-14:5 VIRGILIO[5]- 60:21,84:17 18:23, 19:1, unload[1]-46:24 50:19,51:23, weights(1]-16:7 19:22,20:2, 52:8,53:8,56:3 Y 20:3,27:2, unmonitored[1]- welcome[1]- 36:13 Virgilio[1]-50:20 101:19 yard[1]-75:18 29:23,29:24, vision(2]-10:9, 64:6,70:17, unusual[1]- welfare[1]-20:23 yards[a]-23:17, 39:18 22:1 wells[41-23:2, 59:16,69:11, 78:16,79:19, Up[49]-5:10, visit,,,,]-98:9 25:24,31:11, 69:13 79:20 5:13,6:15,7:17, Vitosh[2]-104:3, 92:15 year[4]-18:2, zonings[1]-80:1 8:18,9:10, 13:4, 105:6 WELZ[15]- 27:12,28:1, 13:9, 13:13, vote[4]-41:1, 35:15,37:16, 63:8 15:24, 16:2, 66:14,66:18, 37:21,38:11, years[17]-12:24, 17:9, 19:6, 103:4 39:1,53:15, 26:8,27:6,38:5, 26:12,30:9, 56:19,57:8, 45:15,49:19, 37:1,37:9,38:4, W 57:18,57:24, 63:7,65:14, 40:17,42:9, 59:3,59:81 68:8,89:7,89:8, 42:23,48:22, waiting I1]- 59:18,59:21, 90:24, 92:24, 49:17, 50:20, 100:11 70:23 93:9,95:19, 50:24,59:12, Walgreens[1]- Welz[2]-35:15, 95:20,95:23 62:7,62:15, 95:9 53:15 yellow(1)-93:11 62:16,68:18, walk[2]-79:19, west(1]-97:7 YORKVILLE(2]- 68:24,69:4, 92:21 western[1]-79:3 1:2, 1:3 Depo•Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 _00 c,r United City of Yorkville For F01A Crlmr Uw 0* ,`� , • 800 Game Farm Road Date Received: W6 Yorkville,Illinois 60560 �-� Telephone: 630-5534350 Received by: 9 11 y Fa : 630-553-7575 I"— Response Due Date: FOIA Officers for City Records/Information: Lisa Pickering,Meghan Ostreko,and Bart Olson Extended Due Date: '7 UNITED CITY OF YORKVELLE REQUEST FOR RECORDS UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT Commercial Request means the use of any part of a public record in any form for sale,resale,or solicitation or advertisement for sales or services. Is this a Commercial Request? Yes xxxxx No Name of Requesterloseph.l Phillips Request is made on behalf of(self or name of business/organization) D Construction Address1488 South Broadway Street City/State/ZipCoal City IL 60416 Phone815/378-9656 Email phillipsdevelopmentgroup @yahoo.com In order to expedite the search for records,please describe as accurately and specifically as possible the records you are requesting. Description of Records Requested: n o&Aat ona AA)P 1 t: J, f,' I w.:nu eP Aldaj owe Air oeaw�S'� Qd4g i ferntt .sl�i S tj.1 es Rd �:� a AeAol� •� C rX Jfi� W111e & e>t uest is Made: (��I- � �/ Or d 4 +1/r K a/ /w�Irv� 1n 4 y iA�">� 4W Ca►4:w � Ga/ eme To inspect the records described above. ,,,/�cabb� �r si k ao�t� ,* i fa For a paper copy of the records described above. r •r On For the records described above to be provided via CD. G xxxx For records descri to be provided via email. (Size limit on email is 10 MB) e o perso g this request Date of Request For Non-commercial Requests,the United City of Yorkville will respond to this request within five(5)working days after the receipt of request. For Commercial Requests,the United City of Yorkville will respond to this request within 21 working days after the receipt of request. A fee to cover the cost of copying records,but not to include the cost of an employee's time to research and copy the records, will be charged at the following rates: The first 50 pages of 8%2 x 11,8%2 x 14,or 11 x 17 size paper are free;documents over 50 pages are 15 cents a page for 8'/2 x 11,8'/2 x 14,or 11 x 17 size paper. Oversize copies are$3.00 per page for 24"x 36" size paper and$10.00 per page for 42"x 66"size paper. Audio tapes are$1.30;CDs and DVDs are$.0.35. Print Form N, ctr�. United City of Yorkville ForF014 Mike; tmwo„n, J= T 800 Game Farm Road Date Received: E4r. 7 law Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Received by: �� ;_. y Fax: 630-553-7575 9 �W 20 Response Due Date: LE tV FOIA Officers for City RecordsA nformation: Lisa Pickering, Mcghan Ostreko, and Bart Olson Extended Due Date: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE REQUEST FOR RECORDS UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT Commercial Request means the use of any part of a public record in any form for sale, resale, or solicitation or advertisement for sales or services. Is this a Commercial Request? Yes X No Name of Requester David Schultz, P. E. Request is made on behalf of (self or name of business/organization) HR GREEN , INC. - David Schultz Address651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201 City/State/ZipYorkville/IL/60560 Phone630-553-7560 Main or 630-708-5002 Direct Email dschultz @hrgreen.com In order to expedite the search for records, please describe as accurately and specifically as possible the records you are requesting. Description of Records Requested: Information submitted as part of the Evergreen Farm Development Application (Corner of Fox and Pavilion Roads) Engineering Plans and supplemental background information (i.e. soil boring logs, topographical surveys or plats, concept plans, certified public hearing notification, and any other submitted information for that subject parcel) Field Tile Survey Information and Existing Tree Survey Due Diligence Reports or Site Investigation Reports Request is Made: X To inspect the records described above. For a paper copy of the records described above. For the records described above to be provided via CD. X For the records described above to be provided via email. (Size limit on email is 10 MB) 01 -04-2012 ignature of person making this request Date of Request For Non-commercial Requests, the United City of Yorkville will respond to this request within five (5) working days after the receipt of request. For Commercial Requests, the United City of Yorkville will respond to this request within 21 working days after the receipt of request. A tee to cover the cost of copying records, but not to include the cost of an employee's time to research and copy the records, will be charged at the following rates: The first 50 pages of 8 '/: x 11 , 8 '/: x 14, or 11 x 17 size paper are free: documents over 50 pages are 15 cents a page for 8 '/ x 11 , 8 %2 x 14, or I I x 17 size paper. Oversize copies are $3 .00 per page for 24" x 36" size paper and $ 10.00 per page for 42" x 66" size paper. Audio tapes are $ 1 .30: CDs and DVDs are $.0.35. Hydrologic & Hydraulic Analysis For: SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY (FOX ROAD AREA) `QED SIP 2 w 0 E5i CCE United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois February 20, 2007 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 Phone: (630)466-9350 Prepared For: 44W110 U.S. Highway 20 United City of Yorkville Hampshire,IL 60140 800 Game Farm Road Phone: (847)683-3100 Yorkville, IL 60560 www.eeiweb.com SOUTHWEST STORMWA TER STUDY United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: United City of Yorkville Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 800 Game Farm Road 52 Wheeler Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 (630) 553-4350 www.eeiweb.com www.yorkville.il.us (630) 466-9350 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION I, Jay P. Nemeth, a licensed professional engineer of Illinois, hereby certify that this report was prepared under my direct supervision. Dated this day of AD, 2007 at Sugar Grove, Illinois. Jay P. Nemeth, P.E., CFM Illinois Licensed Professional Engineer No. 062-055794 My license expires on November 30th, 2007 - 2 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois TABLE OF CONTENTS § PROJECT LOCATION EXHIBIT 1. ABSTRACT 2. STUDY AREA 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS 3.A HYDROLOGIC MODELING 3.A.1 METHODOLOGY 3.A.2 ANALYSIS 3.B CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS 3.B.1 EXISTING DRAINAGE PROBLEMS 3.B.2 HYDRAULIC MODELING 3.B.3 ANALYSIS 3.B.3.a FA-31 3.B.3.b FA-32 3.B.3.c FA-41 3.B.3.d FA-42 3.B.3.e FA-43 3.8.3.f FA-44 3.B.3.g FA-45 3.B.3.h FA-46 3.B.3.i FA-47 3.B.3.j FA-48 3.B.3.k FA-22+23 4. PROPOSED CONDITIONS 4.A FUTURE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS 4.B HYDROLOGIC MODELING 4.B.1 METHODOLOGY 4.B.2 ANALYSIS 4.0 CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS 4.C.1 FA-32 4.C.2 FA-41 4.C.3 FA-42 4.C.4 FA-43 4.C.5 FA-44 4.C.6 FA-46 4.C.7 FA-48 4.C.8 FA-22+23 - 3 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois TABLE OF CONTENTS S. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 5.A REDUCTION IN ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE 5.B REGIONAL DETENTION 5.0 CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS 5.C.1 EXISTING SYSTEM UPGRADES 5.C.2 OUTFALL STORM SEWERS 5.D BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 6.A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN CRITERIA 6.A.1 ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE 6.A.2 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 6.B CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS 7. CONCLUSION § TABLES T.1 SUBWATERSHED SUMMARY T.2 PEAK RUNOFF SUMMARY § EXHIBITS E.1 STUDY AREA E.2 WATERSHED BOUNDARIES E.3 TOPOGRAPHIC BASE MAP E.4 FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS E.5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT LOCATIONS § APPENDIX A.A SIMULATED STORAGE SUPPORTING CALCULATIONS A.8 RUNOFF HYDROGRAPHS A.0 HYDRAULIC MODELING CALCULATIONS A.D ELECTRONIC DATA - 4 - 1E Q Study Area Fie D 70 �4 Yorkville RWerRd �_ R ireh mr �ffVdmu4e-S 9 tl. W m � 001ph t nge t 1 � t : :•.:...��.: .::......::,.•: � .-->':....,:•: �..,.. .. :. .cis.. 1 I Beaver st p i i r • t � Cl I } , _ 1 d' II r � La re1C t o I G p Budd Rd _ II e 0 1J U � Amen Rd I DATE: s, Engineering Enterprises United City of Yorkville 22 DEC 2006 AAA : 52 Wheeler Road � � 800 Game Farts Road PROJECT No. roosza J` {II Sugar Grove,Illinois 60554 _° Yorkville,Illinois 60560 'L¢' BV. JPN STUDY AREA (630)466-9350 _ (630)553-4350 PATH: H'1GIS�PGBLIMYORWLL-00534 www.eeiweb.com ''g www.yorkville.il.us FILE. YG053C Exo,S,GGV �Mm r-- NO SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY ter£; 1. ABSTRACT EEI was retained on behalf of the United City of Yorkville, Illinois to perform a regional stormwater drainage study for the Southwest development region. The study was commissioned upon the recommendation of the United City of Yorkville Plan Commission to identify and address regional stormwater management issues within the study area. Approximately 1,225 Acres of residential and commercial development have been proposed in the study area as part of ten (10) planned unit developments (PUD). This study identifies the impacts of the proposed PUD's on current stormwater management systems. Deficiencies in the current stormwater management systems are also identified and conveyance improvements to such are recommended. Additional alternatives including regional detention, best management practices (BMP's), and reduced allowable release rate criteria have also been evaluated to determine their relative benefits. 2. STUDY AREA The Southwest development region is generally bounded by the Fox River to the north, Illinois Route 71 to the south, High Point Road to the west, and Illinois Route 47 to the east. A study area location map can be seen in the attached Exhibit No. 1. The study area consists of eight (8) principal watersheds draining approximately 5.8 miz. Watershed boundaries can bee seen in the attached Exhibit No. 2. Tributary Watershed Name Area Acres East Bluff 151.5 High Point 295.1 Hydraulic 21.3 *Middle Aux Sable 345.1 Pavilion 1,526.8 Poplar 1,045.9 Walsh 415.4 West Bluff 84.7 * Seven of the eight principal watersheds are tributary to the Fox River; the eighth is tributary to Middle Aux Sable Creek. - 5 - r"`'= SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS 3.A HYDROLOGIC MODELING 3.A.1 METHODOLOGY HEC-HMS version 2.2.2 (Hydrologic Engineering Center - Hydrologic Modeling System, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) was used for the hydrologic analysis of the study area watersheds. For more information on HEC-HMS, refer to http://www.hec.usace.army.mil/. The analysis was performed using the SCS Curve Number and SCS Unit Hydrograph options in HEC-HMS. Rainfall amounts used in the HEC-HMS model are taken from Illinois State Water Survey Bulletin 71 for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year recurrence interval storm events. Durations of 1-hour, 2-hours, 3-hours, 6-hours, 12-hours, 18-hours, and 24- hours were analyzed for each recurrence interval to determine the critical duration storm for the given element. Huff quartile rainfall distributions (for point rainfall) were utilized as appropriate to the analyzed storms duration. Rainfall Depth Duration (inches) Huff Quartile 100-yr 50-yr 25-yr 10-yr 1-hr 3.56 3.04 2.59 2.10 1s` 2-hr 4.47 3.82 3.25 2.64 1s` 3-hr 4.85 4.14 3.53 2.86 1st 6-hr 5.68 4.85 4.13 3.35 1st 12-hr 6.59 5.62 4.79 3.89 2nd 18-hr 1 6.97 5.95 5.06 4.11 3rd 24-hr 1 7.58 6.46 5.51 4.47 3rd Watershed and subwatershed boundaries were delineated using USGS quadrangle (ten-foot interval contour) maps. This data was supplemented with a field survey of selected hydraulic structures within the study area. The topographic base map and subwatershed delineation can be seen in Exhibit No. 3. The SCS runoff curve number method was used to determine the initial abstraction (or loss rate) before runoff begins. Runoff curve numbers (CN) used for each subwatershed in the HEC-HMS model were determined by a visual review of landuse and hydrologic soil group data. Base CN values were taken from Table 2-2 of TR-55 (Technical Release No. 55, USDA-NRCS). Table No. 1 presents a summary of the runoff CN for each of the subwatersheds. - 6 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY A variation of the Equations for Estimating Clark Unit Hydrograph Parameters for Small Rural Watersheds in Illinois (USGS 00-4184) was used to determine the Time of Concentration (Tc) for each subwatershed. Utilizing subwatershed area as the primary characteristic, the following equation was used to determine Tc: Tc = 39.1 * A0-577 * (I + 1)-1.146 * Do.781 Where Tc is the time of concentration in minutes, A is the subwatershed area in square miles, I is the percentage of impervious cover, and D is the effective precipitation depth in inches. Lag time (T,,,9) was subsequently calculated as 0.6*Tc. Table No. 1 presents a summary of Tc and T,a9 values for each of the subwatersheds. Existing detention basins are present in subwatersheds 202, 204, and 309. To represent the attenuation effect of the storage in the hydrologic model, the volume of storage present and peak allowable release rate were estimated using the Yorkville Modified Rational Method. The impervious percentage for each of these subwatersheds was assumed to be 0.378 (based on a CN of 75), resulting in a site runoff coefficient "C" of 0.68. Given subwatershed area, the resultant storage and peak allowable discharge values calculated for the 2-year, 25-year, and 100-year increments were then incorporated into the model. Supporting calculations can be found in Appendix A. The SCS Lag method was used to approximate the travel time along channelized stream segments. Utilizing an assumed velocity based upon the average watershed slope, segment length was used to calculate approximate lag times. 3.A.2 ANALYSIS Twenty (20) locations were selected within the study area for analysis. The flow analysis locations include the downstream outfall locations of the eight (8) watersheds in the study area and twelve (12) hydraulic structure locations within the watersheds. The flow analysis locations selected can be seen in the attached Exhibit No. 4. A summary of the peak runoff rates at each of the flow analysis locations for the critical duration 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year recurrence interval storm events has been provided in Table No. 2. A graphical representation of the peak runoff rates at each of the locations can be seen in Figure No. 1 below: - 7 - Figure No.1 +c 2,000 ■100-year Recurrence Interval' 1.800 - ■50-year Recurrence Interval '■25-year Recurrence Interval 10-year Recurrence Interval 1,600 1,400 1,200 0 co z 1,000 IL 800 O 600 y 400 y y 200 y O X 0 FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- FA- a 10 20 22 23 30 31 32 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 50 60 70 80 ~ Flow Analysis Location h C SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY The 1-hour duration storm event is the critical duration storm for FA-10 and FA-20. The 2-hour duration storm event is the critical duration storm for each of the remaining flow analysis locations. Runoff hydrographs for each of the flow analysis locations have been included as Appendix B. 3.B CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS 3.B.1 EXISTING DRAINAGE PROBLEMS Twelve (12) hydraulic structure locations were identified within the study area as potential conveyance restrictions based upon reports related by United City of Yorkville staff and our analysis. The locations include FA-22 and FA-23 along the Walsh Tributary, FA-31 and FA-32 along the Poplar Tributary and FA-41, FA-42, FA-43, FA- 44, FA-45, FA-46, FA-47, and FA-48 along the Pavilion Tributary (refer to Exhibit No. 5 for reference). Each of these locations is discussed in specific detail in section 3.13.3 below. EEI is not aware of any reports of structural flooding related to any of the conveyance problems at these locations. The drainage problems appear to be limited to nuisance flooding' due to poor conveyance. EEI did not perform a survey of the lowest opening elevations of adjacent structures to determine their flood risk. A flood risk analysis is outside the scope of this analysis. 3.B.2 HYDRAULIC MODELING EEI performed field surveys of the hydraulic structures at each of the selected analysis locations. An existing conditions hydraulic model along the Pavilion Tributary had previously been completed as part of the Aspen Ridge Estates development. This HEC-RAS model was revised and supplemented with EEI field data to perform the hydraulic analysis at locations FA-47 and FA-48. At the other locations, Haested Methods - Culvermaster was used to model the hydraulic characteristics of the structures at the analysis locations. Hydraulic modeling calculations can be found in Appendix A.0 and on the attached compact disc. 1 Nuisance flooding - referring to non-structural flooding or flooding that poses no immediate threat to life, health or safety. - 9 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY 3.8.3 ANALYSIS 3.8.3.a FA-31 A natural bottom box opening bridge is present at this location. The opening is approximately 28-feet wide and 6- feet in height. A rough Culvertmaster analysis of the structure was performed to produce a flow rating curve for the structure. The analysis indicates that the existing bridge has sufficient capacity for the 100-year critical duration peak flow below the low chord of the bridge. Water surface elevations for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: FA41 907 00 - BWoo ---------------------------------------- 99500 SMW W3 00 amw 99109 • "E`er° 100yew p- 9 —Rating Cirve 90000 ---9ndya.aw Chad E.! 59000 00 200.0 4000 9U00 9]00 10000 12000 Flow IC" 3.8.3.b FA-32 An 83-inch wide by 53" high elliptical corrugated metal pipe culvert (CMP) is present at this location. A Culvertmaster analysis of the structure was performed to produce a flow rating curve for the structure. The analysis indicates that the existing culvert has insufficient capacity for the 10-year critical duration peak flow below the crest of the road. Water surface elevations for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: - 10 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY FA42 03800 03700 63800 --------------- --------- ---------- -- - ------ emw d 63400 6100 69200 "� 1 4 zi—E-W* 63100 q 1001ee1 EIXWV —MMOAM ---Rona CM4 Ebv 52000 00 1000 2000 3000 4000 =0 0000 7000 6000 9000 Fbl(Nn) 3.8.3.c FA-41 A 48-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe culvert (CMP) is present at this location. A Culvertmaster analysis of the structure was performed to produce a flow rating curve for the structure. The analysis indicates that the existing culvert has insufficient capacity for the 10-year critical duration peak flow below the crest of the road. Water surface elevations for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: FA41 6160D 616 00 _ 61400 613 00 Q 61200 ---------------4— 61100 0 610 DD Bog 00 t0yeer Etmbtp 2symrE�nnp ; a SOyaat E%gCnp 608 Do 1001/—Egg4g� —Rating Ceroe ___Rmtl Gael Elev 907 00 ` 60800 00 3700 4000 6000 900.0 10000 12m0 14000 16000 10000 F1a+(dy - 11 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY 3.8.3.d FA-42 A 48-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe culvert (CMP) is present at this location. A Culvertmaster analysis of the structure was performed to produce a flow rating curve for the structure. The analysis indicates that the existing culvert has insufficient capacity for the 50-year critical duration peak flow below the crest of the road. Water surface elevations for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: FA-47 845.0 &100 805.0 0.'10.0 8730 _ ....1 � • 23+yaer ExgbnO � to0yaar Exegem ego 0 9 --Rating(,`yM —--Road CMU Bev 8550 0 100 200 700 400 S00 800 Fbw(eh) 3.8.3.e FA-43 A 36-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe culvert (RCP) is present at this location. A Culvertmaster analysis of the structure was performed to produce a flow rating curve for the structure. The analysis indicates that the existing culvert has insufficient capacity for the 10-year critical duration peak flow below the crest of the road. Water surface elevations for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: - 12 - SOUTHWEST STORM WATER STUDY FX0 6440 e42 0 6400 ------------- —— -------- -------- ---------- 8380 e3ao 0340 �> iayam 1 e3zo ■ ��a ,—y—re—'a —ltonry qm■ 0300 ---ROeOlxatEkr 629 0 0 60 100 130 200 2so 300 300 400 4:10 new(oh) 3.8.3,f FA-44 An 83-inch wide by 53" high elliptical corrugated metal pipe culvert (CMP) is present at this location. A Culvertmaster analysis of the structure was performed to produce a flow rating curve for the structure. The analysis indicates that the existing culvert has insufficient capacity for the 10-year critical duration peak flow below the crest of the road. Water surface elevations for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: FA-44 8710 --------- ------ - ------- -------- ---------- - 6766 C 6680 i m 8680 0870 251m E 6860 501M t - pe,m Cwve M0 ---P..0 SEW 6640 0 200 400 600 800 ,000 1200 mw)dq - 13 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY 3.8.3.g FA-45 A natural bottom box opening bridge is present at this location. The opening is approximately 23-feet wide and 9- feet in height. A rough Culvertmaster analysis of the structure was performed to produce a flow rating curve for the structure. The analysis indicates that the existing bridge has sufficient capacity for the 100-year critical duration peak flow below the low chord of the bridge. Water surface elevations for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: Seto ._ FA-" i J 880.0 --------------------------------------------------- 878.0 i. i 878 0 e77o j Ono 1 8 8780 a _ 8740 . • t0�rSl ExuMp � I • 2sm��o l e73.0 • -Ra4rg Cone 8720 i.---Lq+'Ch*rd Elsv 8710 0 100 200 300 400 500 am 700 8m HOW(Cs) 3.8.3.h FA-46 An 83-inch wide by 53" high elliptical corrugated metal pipe culvert (CMP) is present at this location. A Culvertmaster analysis of the structure was performed to produce a flow rating curve for the structure. The analysis indicates that the existing culvert has insufficient capacity for the 10-year critical duration peak flow below the crest of the road. Water surface elevations for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: — 14— SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY FA-46 0840 683.0 0850 8810 Wo 0790 � tOyOef Exmlap 876.0 23yeer EKWM 60•Yem ExMV 100""E-" _Ryag� oa 0770 ———Road Crag Elav 0760 0 100 200 300 400 300 000 700 Flew(ch) 3.8.3.i FA-47 A natural bottom bridge is present at this location. The opening is approximately 52-feet wide and 10-feet in height. A HEC-RAS analysis of the structure was performed to produce flow profiles for the structure. The analysis indicates that the existing bridge has sufficient capacity for the 100-year critical duration peak flow below the low chord of the bridge. Water surface profiles for the 10-year, 25- year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: medi6ad paragon 6 fee road study Plan:PW Ex 122IMM —___.._.____._.__ P•�mROd TUB a/FeF Red -w 6,0 - Work 'i WB 1-Yarft we SM1YaY Et we 15-YM Fa e.e we 104q b cm1a w age aaee — am �.� am 82M Temo mao m/o ahle ChW4d am—lq - 15 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY 3.B.3.j FA-48 Two 8-foot wide by 5-foot high box culverts are present at this location. A HEC-RAS analysis of the structure was performed to produce flow profiles for the structure. The analysis indicates that the existing bridge has insufficient capacity for the 50-year critical duration peak flow below the crest of the road. Water surface profiles for the 10-year, 25- year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: mo*W Pavd6on 8 fax mad NWy Plan Pav Ex IMMM FV4 tWYNlFi Ws aaY.r E. e. vrs s-YNr ��-•� [ -21-1- Grand_ t — 6M� 044 —� 1{II 1 N0� w� M00 lGaa IWa nad 6155 Ixan OaMY Ixrra.p) 3.B.3.k FA-22 and FA-23 A 24-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe culvert (CMP) is present at location FA-22. A 54-inch diameter corrugated metal pipe culvert (CMP) is present at location FA-23. An initial analysis of the two locations indicated that the culverts at the two locations function in combination during high runoff producing storm events. As such, the two culverts were considered as one location for the purposes of our analysis. A Culvertmaster analysis of the combined structure was performed to produce a flow rating curve for the combined structure. The analysis indicates that the existing combined structure has insufficient capacity for the 50-year critical duration peak flow below the crest of the road. Water surface elevations for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the figure below: - 16 - *f SOUTHWEST STORMWA TER STUDY FA-12,23 "00 eeaao ------------------------ --ter-------- ----------------- w � 64100 =Do F a?00 ,-v�- , > l 6MW _- L SUM 00 000 1000 1500 7000 2500 3000 3000 4000 4400 5000 ftw1m1 4. PROPOSED CONDITIONS 4.A FUTURE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Approximately 1,225 Acres of residential and commercial development have been proposed in the study area as part of ten (10) planned unit developments (PUD). The location of the proposed developments can be seen in the attached Exhibit No. 5. The proposed PUD's and their approximate areas are as follows: Approximate Development Name Area Acres Aspen Ridge Estates 121 Chally Farm 150 Cornerstone 37 Evergreen Farm 68 Fox River Bluffs 379 Matlock 19 Meadowbrook Homes 161 Harris Farm Silver Fox 107 Villas at the Preserve 24 York Wood Estates 159 The proposed condition analysis assumes each of the developments has been fully constructed in accordance with current United City of Yorkville ordinances. With respect to stormwater management, this assumes that sufficient detention has been provided to limit the peak discharge from the developments to 0.15 cfs/acre in accordance with the Yorkville - 17 - *f SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY Modified Rational Method. No other changes to existing landuse outside of these developments have been considered as part of the proposed condition. 4.B HYDROLOGIC MODELING 4.B.1 METHODOLOGY The existing condition HEC-HMS hydrologic model discussed above in §3.A.1 was utilized as the base condition. CN and Tc values were adjusted accordingly in the proposed development subwatershed areas to reflect the proposed landuse. Table No. 1 provides a summary of the revised runoff CN, Tc, and T,a9 values for each of the affected subwatersheds. Simulated detention basins were created for each of the twenty-six (26) subwatersheds to be impacted by the proposed developments. To represent the attenuation effect of the required detention in the hydrologic model, the volume of storage and peak allowable release rate required by the ordinance were estimated using the Yorkville Modified Rational Method (as discussed in §3.A.1). The resultant storage and peak allowable discharge values calculated for the 2- year, 25-year, and 100-year increments were then incorporated into the model to simulate the proposed conditions detention basins. Supporting calculations for the development of the simulated detention basins can be found in Appendix A. 4.8.2 ANALYSIS A summary of the peak runoff rates at each of the twenty (20) selected flow analysis locations for the critical duration 10-year, 25- year, 50-year, and 100-year recurrence interval storm events has been provided in Table No. 2. A graphical representation of the peak runoff rates relative to the existing condition peak runoff rates at each of the locations can be seen in Figure No. 2 below: - 18 - *f gr-� w$ Figure No.2 2,000 1,800 ■Existing 100-year i Proposed 100-year ■Existing 50-year 1,600 0 Proposed 50-year ■Existing 25-year ■Proposed 25-year 1,400 E:Existing 10-year 0 Proposed 10-Year 1,200 1,000 w 800 c f O OC 600 C a 400 o 200 � 3 o l n FA-10 FA-20 FA-22 FA-23 FA-30 FA-31 FA-32 FA-40 FA-41 FA-42 FA-43 FA-44 FA-45 FA-4a FA-47 FA-48 FA-50 FA-80 FA-70 FA-80 Flow Analysis Location in ,� c SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY The 1-hour duration storm event is the critical duration storm for FA-10 and FA-60 in the proposed condition. The 2-hour duration storm event is the critical duration storm for each of the remaining flow analysis locations in the proposed condition. Existing and proposed condition runoff hydrographs for each of the flow analysis locations have been provided for comparison in Appendix B. The percentage of reduction from the existing condition peak runoff rate at each of the flow analysis locations is contained in Table No. 2. The reduction in peak runoff rates in the proposed conditions ranges from a minimum of 16.6% to a maximum of 97.0%. The reduction in peak runoff rates for the 100-year recurrence interval at each of the flow analysis locations is presented graphically in Figure No. 3 below: - 20 - �6 Figure No.3 100% OReduction%cram Usting Condtion flaw ■Proposed Condition%of Existing CanMw Flaw g0% 80% 3 70% LL Y m d 60% 50% 01 C i 40% W o O 30% 20% 1 y 10% O 3 0% r b FA-10 FA-20 FA-22 FA-23 FX30 FA-31 FA-32 FA40 FA-41 FA42 FA43 FA-44 FA45 FA46 FA-47 FA48 FA-50 FA-60 FA-70 FA-80 Flow Analysis Location y O �C SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY M . The corresponding reductions in peak flow rates for the 50-year, 25-year, and 10-year recurrence intervals are roughly scalar, with slight variations due to the underlying hydrologic equations. 4.0 CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS The proposed conditions peak runoff rates were input into the hydraulic models discussed in §3.B.2 and §3.B.3 above for analysis. For the purposes of the proposed conditions analysis, only those locations with insufficient capacity for the existing conditions peak runoff were analyzed. 4.C.1 FA-32 The effect of the reduction in peak flows due to the proposed development for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the graphic below: FA42 63600 63700 _ 83600 1. -------------- __ --_--' —______ __—____.----- 83600 T_ 63400 $ moo • t0ywr EMrsnrg 851.00 d ® 10yasr Ropoed • 25'7 E-br4 0 Z""Propwed • 50•yasrBaUrg 03100 ® 5W01— d My—BMWO O 106ymef P1'arM/ 83000 —RWg Cove __R08dCM*M&V 62600 OD 1000 2000 300.0 4000 6000 6000 7000 6000 6000 FIMW■1 The recurrence interval for flow overtopping the road at FA-32 is reduced to approximately once in twenty-five years. 4.C.2 FA-41 The effect of the reduction in peak flows due to the proposed development for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the graphic below: - 22 - SOUTHWEST STORM WATER STUDY 6,600 6noo _ 81400 �� ! 61500 $ 61200 1i > 00 as 611 61000 • 10-Year Exsshng • 16"W fhopueW we 00 • 2S'Ymu O 23yam Ropogd 60600 • 501M Prop—d t00yeu EK•Iwe O t00yeef P 607 00 .—Rating 0"s --—Road C m*Eiev(upoe�d 60600 00 200A 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 10000 16000 PMw(e1" The recurrence interval for flow overtopping the road at FA-41 is reduced in the proposed condition; however it is insufficiently reduced to prevent flows overtopping the roadway during a 10-year recurrence interval storm event. 4.C.3 FA-42 The effect of the reduction in peak flows due to the proposed development for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the graphic below: 8460 -------------------------------- -- --------- -- 8406 853 0 8250 ® 10yrr ROp0�w1 �' • 23+7edt Ex•luw • Pmpo-d I . soya1E»muv $$ • W*WtRmp—a szao , • 100"W PmPosed --Rating CurYe —ROOtl Qm1 EbY 8150 0 100 200 3W 400 800 500 FlmY(cam - 23 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY Sufficient capacity is available at FA-42 to eliminate flow overtopping the roadway in the proposed condition 100-year storm event. 4.C.4 FA-43 The effect of the reduction in peak flows due to the proposed development for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the graphic below: FA-0 ® g 64no ------------- -- — --- +-------- ---------- — � g- 63an g N Mo m 6340 • tDyardstN�p...I a` ° t0y66r R6paeo • 2Syeer E>tWmg a • 63zo � O0ye6r Expleg . ♦ 501WProaeeed at E�nn 63an t00•y° toojeN � -Rating Cove --I'M Cres Elev Sao 0 M 100 150 200 200 300 360 4M 4S0 FWW(ep) The recurrence interval for flow overtopping the road at FA-43 is reduced to approximately once in twenty-five years. 4.C.5 FA-44 The effect of the reduction in peak flows due to the proposed development for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the graphic below: — 24— A °AI, SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY FA-" 873 C -- 6720 �O✓J 0710 Emu 8000 ;71 0880 _!iONe-r Existing 1 887.0 • �7PMPO$ed • 2S"W ExuWy • 25J—Propotaa 6660 • 50-y—P pas 50�yeat PlopweC lGay—�+e o ioa,a Pr PMW Q86 0 I—R-Img Cure --R--a Cre9 Elan 8840 0 700 400 600 8m 1000 1300 elowidsD The recurrence interval for flow overtopping the road at FA-44 is reduced in the proposed condition; however it is insufficiently reduced to prevent flows overtopping the roadway during a 10-year recurrence interval storm event. 4.C.6 FA-46 The effect of the reduction in peak flows due to the proposed development for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the graphic below: FA46 8040 6X10 6870 ----------- --- --'--- —'ib'--- --- ---------- --- 680e d me • 10M�Eaatn6 • t0"&Pmpae•6 • 26•y—Ex•Wq • 25-y—Prapoeaa 6780 4 5"M ♦ 50"W Pmpoaad 10DyaalECIWV 677 0 • 100Ytaf Propow --Ro-tl Creti Elev 876.0 0 100 200 300 400 500 800 700 FIM 4dO The recurrence interval for flow overtopping the road at FA-46 is reduced to approximately once in ten years. - 25 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY 4.C.7 FA-48 The effect of the reduction in peak flows due to the proposed development for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the graphic below: fb - POMORMOTMOFFacflap ---Lp1r10 _ __W9 tOpYev Ro i On.- f I v _ --. — WS tSY—OC.e2--... WAS 7SYW Pb J .....••••-••`. VM TFYW& w sat so 6950 9000 9M wea Dl so RIYn CT�nM moI [M The recurrence interval for flow overtopping the road at FA-48 is reduced to approximately once in fifty years. 4.C.7 FA-22 and FA-23 The effect of the reduction in peak flows due to the proposed development for the 10-year, 25-year, 50-year, and 100-year flood events can be seen in the graphic below: - 26 - SOUTHWEST STORMWA TER STUDY moo FA n+23 M00 ------------------------ -- ------- ----------------- 64t 00 M 00 • tayurFwug a • toyserPmpo4s0 e3700 • 251-rEawre ZjMrPMPWd • 50j—Ropaatl 635 00 '-"w +D o +oayemaopo.ed I—Rahrtg Cw' .—--Roaa Cron El- 633 00 0.0 Soo 1000 +500 1000 1300 300o moo 4000 4500 5000 raw(cb1 The recurrence interval for flow overtopping the road at FA-22+23 is reduced to approximately once in fifty years. S. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 5.A REDUCTION IN ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE A reduction in the peak allowable release rate was considered for several of the proposed developments based upon their current land plans and ability to accommodate additional detention storage on the sites. Under this scenario, the peak allowable release rate from the proposed developments was reduced from 0.15 cfs/Acre of development to 0.10 cfs/Acre of development for the following subwatersheds: 307, 407, 415, 418, and 421. Due to the proximity of the watersheds to the selected flow analysis locations, the effect on the peak flow was negligible in all cases. This can be seen in the Figure No. 4 below: - 27 - e Figure No.4 ta,'" r` 2000 ■Existing Condition 100-year Peak Ruraff ■Proposed Condition 100-year Peak Runoff low 9)Reduced Allowable Realse Rate Alternative 1600 1400 1200 w V � O N 1000 0 Y I aw (A O C SOD = 400 y 200 O 3 a 0 T FA-30 FA-31 FA-32 FA-40 FA-41 FA-42 FA-43 FA-44 FA-45 FA-46 FA-47 FA-48 74 Flow Analysis Location y O SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY 5.8 REGIONAL DETENTION Regional detention basins were briefly considered as an alternative to reduce flooding concerns in the Pavilion Tributary and Poplar Tributary watersheds. Each of these watersheds is comparatively narrow relative to their length in addition to being relatively steep. As a result, the peak subwatershed runoffs from shorter duration higher intensity storms combine quickly to produce a watershed hydrograph with a steep rise and a shallow fall. To address the flooding concerns in the Pavilion Tributary and Poplar Tributary watersheds, a regional basin would be required in close proximity to the particular flooding concern to provide a benefit. Due to the steep topography, the usual land and cost savings related to the construction of regional detention would not be achievable. In these two cases, the construction of smaller site specific detention basins throughout the watersheds would achieve the same reductions in peak runoff. As such, regional detention was not evaluated in detail for these watersheds. 5.0 CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS 5.C.1 EXISTING SYSTEM UPGRADES The results of our analysis indicate that the runoff generated in the study area primarily results in nuisance flooding; the exception being at flow analysis location FA-32. At FA-32, when the roadway is overtopped, emergency services would not have access to the residences located south along the private Fox Drive. Fox Drive however is a private roadway and neither the City nor Township has the jurisdictional authority to address the issue. In the other locations where flows overtop roads in the analyzed storm events, alternate access routes are available. North of Fox Glen Drive, near FA-43, the homes along the east side of the east branch of Pavilion Tributary appear to be experiencing streambank erosion that may eventually threaten the structural stability of the homes. Opening up the culvert within the right of way of Fox Glen Drive would only exacerbate this problem if no other action is taken. Channel improvements on the private property north of Fox Glen Drive in coordination with a realignment of the culvert at Fox Glen Drive would provide a benefit if designed and constructed properly. The consideration of conveyance improvements on private property is outside of the scope of this analysis. - 29 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY As the remaining locations pose no direct threat to life, health, or safety, no conveyance improvements have been analyzed. 5.C.2 OUTFALL STORM SEWERS Outfall storm sewers were briefly considered as an alternative to reduce flooding concerns in the Pavilion Tributary and Poplar Tributary watersheds in the vicinity of flow analysis locations FA- 31, FA-32, FA-41, FA-42, and FA-43. The cost to construct outfall storm sewers with 100-year recurrence interval peak runoff capacity would be significantly more costly than simply upsizing the restrictive culvert/bridge crossings. As such, this alternative was not considered in any detail. 5.D BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES As development occurs in the study area, best management practices (BMP's) should be utilized to the extent practicable to minimize the adverse effects of development on water quantity and water quality. In addition to providing stormwater detention to detain excess stormwater runoff and release it at a controlled rate (in accordance with the ordinance), proposed developments should incorporate additional features where practical to further attenuate, infiltrate, and filter surface runoff at the point of generation. Soil borings and supplemental soils information (NRCS Soil Surveys) should be analyzed on a site specific basis to identify suitable soils for infiltration practices. The following infiltration practices should be considered based upon suitability: • Minimization of impervious surfaces • Disconnection of impervious surfaces • Vegetated swales in-lieu of storm sewer • Depressional storage areas (raingardens, depressed islands, settling basins, etc.) • Infiltration devices - basins, trenches, drywells • Filter strips • Porous pavement in low-use areas Adjacent jurisdictions have required that retention be provided for all hydraulically connected impervious areas of new development. In Kane County, retention is required for the runoff volume from a 0.75-inch rainfall event over the hydraulically connected impervious area of new development. The retention volume is stored below the elevation of the primary gravity outlet of the site runoff storage facility. - 30 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 6.A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN CRITERIA 6.A.1 ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATE As indicated by the analysis in §5.A above, no appreciable benefit is achieved through the reduction in the peak allowable release rate for new development. As such, this alternative is not recommended. 6.A.2 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES The best management practices outlined in §5.D above should be incorporated into new developments to the extent practicable to help reduce the quantity of runoff and to promote water quality. However, in the watersheds analyzed, the undetained runoff from upstream areas (both developed and undeveloped) is the major contributing factor to the high peak runoff rates calculated in the analysis. As such, the implementation of best management practices, while recommended, will not appreciably reduce the quantity of runoff within the study area. 6.B CONVEYANCE IMPROVEMENTS As discussed in §5.C.1 above, no conveyance improvements are being recommended. 7. CONCLUSION The Yorkville stormwater detention ordinance is effective in controlling peak runoff rates from new development as evidenced by the reductions noted in Table No. 2 for the 100-year recurrence interval storm. One primary concern however is that the detention basins will detain water frequently for extended periods of time, resulting in downstream streambank erosion. It is generally recognized that bankfull flow conditions, typically relating to the 2-year recurrence interval event, are most related to channel morphology (erosion, deposition, etc.). In a NIPC study of detention effectiveness in Northeastern Illinois, it was determined that an allowable 2-year release rate of 0.04 cfs/acre is likely not to increase existing condition 2-year floWS2, thereby minimizing the likelihood of the channel adjusting (or eroding from extended inundation) due to increased discharge rates. As such, the Yorkville ordinance is in conformance with generally accepted standards. Z Evaluation of Stormwater Detention Effectiveness in Northeastern Illinois, 1990 - Dreher, Schaefer, and Hey. Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission (NIPC). - 31 - SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY As summarized in Table No. 1, the summary average Curve Number (CN), which represents the ability of the land to reduce runoff (infiltration and other abstractions), is reduced from 74.4 to 74.2 in the proposed condition. As such, the total change in the volume (quantity) of runoff under the proposed conditions is negligible. In summary, the proposed developments, designed and constructed in accordance with the Yorkville stormwater ordinance will not adversely impact flooding or conveyance on adjacent properties and in fact should provide a benefit not otherwise realized should these areas remain undeveloped. - 32 - SOUTHWEST STORMWA TER STUDY United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois TABLES Yorkville Southwest Stormwater Study (Fox Road Area) TABLE NO. 1 Subwatershed Summary Existing Proposed Proposed Development `tea o ° $uiitiasin Tribularf ID Tritxftary Marna TG T Equiva)ent ,° Tc Tlxg - Equivalent to Name ON of Impervious Chl of Impervious mil acres (man) (rain) Area (min) (min) Arm 100 UTF-A Hydraulic Cornerstone 0.021154 13.54 13.3 8.0 78.0 45.9% 10.2 6.1 92.0 83.8% 101 UTF-A Hydraulic 1IM",l• 0.012152 7.78 11.5 6.9 70.5 25.7% N' 200 UTF-B Walsh Ir 0.007514 4.81 6.4 5.0 60.0 -2.7% 201 UTF-B Walsh ir'",it.' 0.177564 113.64 32.5 19.5 76.0 40.5% .�,' $,�,, � 1k'!t piT $,..(k ! �w;"" " 202 UTF-B Walsh o,�.•1hF5aj x. 0.057993 37.12 25.5 15.3 75.0 37.8% i11H�!�;;?x�"' ; Ai� 5j 203a UTF-B Walsh "" 0.049449 31.65 15.1 9.1 78.0 45.9% 203b UTF-B Walsh 0.092855 59.43 31.3 18.8 78.0 45.9% 204 UTF-B Walsh 0.131814 84.36 40.0 24.0 76.0 40.5% P• " ' '°�( "' ' "''�� ¢ 't:' +�,*' 205 UTF-B Walsh -ge-a-go-wbrook Homes 0.022822 14.61 13.9 8.3 78.0 45.9% 14.9 8.9 75.0 37.8% (Harris arm) 206 UTF-C Walsh Cornerstone 0.039042 24.99 19.0 11.4 78.0 45.9% 14.6 8.8 92.0 83.8% 207 UTF-B Walsh 0.069938 44.76 27.7 16.6 76.0 40.5% f.,„; ;..*Wi. 1iy,L1)„_„aP1T g1Wr2P11: 300 UTF-C Poplar i 0.128941 82.52 27.4 16.5 67.0 16.2% ,+,',•: �Iuit>N4 'Irl$;,.a� d9�h m �ffi_, . 1l�m:. 301 UTF-C Poplar y. 0.051796 33.15 23.9 14.3 75.0 37.8% 302 UTF-C Poplar ; ..11"', J.., ...,'•) %.,R 0.055884 35.77 20.7 12.4 71.0 27.0% 1A�m r rM -1r,I ,.. 303 UTF-C Poplar li ,wln' I;,ItErr' mu.0 0.085996 55.04 31.8 19.1 71.0 27.0% 34 Cue i°, 304 UTF-C Poplar rr'U1 .141 !i' 0.155484 99.51 31.3 18.8 77.0 43.2% 305 UTF-C Poplar Matlock 0.029243 18.72 16.1 9.7 78.0 45.9% 17.2 10.3 75.0 37.8% 306 UTF-C Poplar � ;, u , 0.008174 5.23 8.6 5.2 73.0 32.4% 307 UTF-C Poplar Meadowbrook Homes 0.228970 146.54 34.4 20.6 78.0 45.9% 37.9 33.7 75.0 37.8% (Harris Farm) 308 UTF-C Poplar 0.111071 71.09 32.9 19.7 76.0 40.5/° o 309 UTF-C Poplar 0.063232 40.47 26.8 16.1 75.0 37.8% I!>i 310 UTF-C Poplar Pii 0.020520 13.13 13.1 7.9 78.0 45.9% 311 UTF-C Poplar Villas at the Preserve 0.038695 24.76 18.9 11.3 78.0 45.9% 16.4 9.8 85.0 64.9% 312 UTF-C Poplar 0.137969 88.30 53.9 32.3 65.0 10.8% 4 �� pia, ,: �,d: a�!Llxul}girms�i ��s 7ll�lli 313 UTF-C Poplar ; .,t,;t' 0.449103 287.43 100.9 60.5 67.0 16.2% a, ., ,r 'kffP4:, ,'fol ,i 314 UTF-C Poplar 0.069154 44.26 26.4 15.8 78.0 45.9% °.,`awn; a:"n. "�;�r: 400 UTF-D Pavilion 0.261617 167.43 50.2 30.1 68.0 18.9% Page 1 of 3 G:1PubhclYo*vi11e120051Y00524 SW Stor ater StudylEngMb_01 Watershed summery.xls Yorkville Southwest Stormwater Study (Fox Road Area) TABLE NO. 1 Subwatershed Summary Existing PrrymSe-d � Sutitasira Trihufary ID Tributary Name Name Proposed Development Area Name T,- f,; Equivalent.° T, TW Equivalent yb CN o impi€rvious CN Of Impervious mi, acres (rnih) (min) Armes (ruin) (min) I Area 401 UTF-D Pavilion Fox River Bluffs 0.008598 5.50 7.9 4.7 78.0 45.9% 8.5 5.1 75.0 37.8% 402 UTF-D Pavilion •6 0.063977 40.95 11.9 7.1 75.0 37.8% 403 UTF-D Pavilion Fox River Bluffs 0.039904 25.54 19.2 11.5 78.0 45.9% 20.5 12.3 75.0 37.8% 404 UTF-D Pavilion 0.071636 45.85 28.8 17.3 75.0 37.8% 405 UTF-D Pavilion 0.004628 2.96 5.5 3.3 78.0 45.9% 406 UTF-D Pavilion Silver Fox 0.012280 7.86 9.7 5.8 78.0 45.9% 10.4 6.2 75.0 37.8% 407 UTF-D Pavilion Silver Fox 0.157618 100.88 42.5 25.5 78.0 45.9% 45.3 27.2 75.0 37.8% 408 UTF-D Pavilion '"`�! ! �i:' 'il�'M" 0.189663 121.38 47.3 28.4 78.0 45.9% j'; 'e+k f �,• " �',.` 409 UTF-D Pavilion Evergreen Farm 0.019846 12.70 12.8 7.7 78.0 45.9% 13.7 8.2 75.0 37.8% 410 UTF-D Pavilion Evergreen Farm 0.037586 24.06 15.3 9.2 78.0 45.9% 16.5 11.9 75.0 37.8% 411 UTF-D Pavilion Fox River Bluffs 0.024401 15.62 14.5 8.7 78.0 45.9% 15.5 9.3 75.0 37.8% 412 UTF-D Pavilion Evergreen Farm 0.059449 36.05 24.2 14.5 78.0 45.9% 25.8 15.5 75.0 37.8% 413 UTF-D Pavilion Aspen Ridge Estates 0.114707 73.41 22.1 13.2 78.0 45.9% 24.4 22.6 75.0 37.8% 414 UTF-D Pavilion 0.077796 49.79 26.2 15.7 76.0 40.5% "' ;..,,Ilr ##1 #:n',:). n �'avi;: 301 ii'> 415 UTF-D Pavilion Chally Farm 0.006088 3.90 6.5 3.9 78.0 45.9% 6.9 4.1 75.0 37.8% 446 UTF-D Pavilion :L.a •" h:.. 0.000310 0.20 5.0 3.0 78.0 45.9% ,.b. 'a'�+• a(r !$! � ,`' ° " �:"+ �' t'' 417 UTF-D Pavilion ;N`;;T;"{ � �!r,; : 0.346489 221.75 63.2 37.9 76.0 40.5% 0NIFINNIRT. "IFF"I 'A 418 UTF-D Pavilion Chally Farm 0.018660 11.94 12.4 7.4 78.0 45.9% 13.2 7.9 75.0 37.8% 419 UTF-D Pavilion ;= 0.002586 1.65 5.0 3.0 78.0 45.9% MIW oq;° '!npir; iii ;11k} 420 UTF-D Pavilion 0.093673 59.95 28.6 17.2 75.0 37.8% `r w rr, 421 UTF-D Pavilion Chally Farm 0.213352 136.55 35.6 21.4 78.0 45.9% 39.0 32.4 75.0 37.8% 422 UTF-D Pavilion 0.039203 25.09 20.3 12.2 75.0 37.8% 424 UTF-D Pavilion 0.080615 51.59 28.8 17.3 78.0 45.9% m 425 UTF-D Pavilion York Wood Estates 0.035589 22.78 15.5 9.3 69.0 21.6% 12.5 11.5 75.0 37.8% 426 UTF-D Pavilion "°" 0.405287 259.38 76.5 45.9 76.0 40.5% �;� .°„n,, n,a;' „ ill i „.•' �k ,; "adi,:. 500 UTF-E East Bluff Fox River Bluffs 0.236765 151.53 57.3 34.4 75.0 37.8% 600 UTF-F West Bluff I Fox River Bluffs 0.120131 76.88 37.1 22.3 77.0 43.2% 38.8 23.3 75.0 37.8% Page 2 d 3 G:%PublulYorlmile12005\YO0524 SW SIo ter SWdy\Eng\Teb_01 Watershed s mmery.xls Yorkville Southwest Stormwater Study (Fox Road Area) TABLE NO. 1 Subwatershed Summary Existing Proposed Sub:asin Trbu(ary ID Trixrtary Name Proposer Davelopmeni Area Tc 7,, Equivalenl"�, T,. Etllivatsnf k dar5r Ofd of Im,per.-ious GPt of lmpervicu mi. arres Qlrin} (mill) Area (rriin1 (11:11; Area 601 UTF-F West Bluff 0.012164 7.78 11.9 7.1 69.0 21.6% 700 UTF-G High Point Fox River Bluffs 0.066753 42.72 15.9 9.5 78.0 45.9% 17.6 16.6 75.0 37.8% 701 UTF-G High Point 0.026101 16.70 14.8 8.9 70.0 24.3% rF '. a' 4"IF 702 UTF-G High Point Fox River Bluffs 0.026975 17.26 15.3 9.2 78.0 45.9% 16.4 9.8 75.0 37.8% 703 UTF-G High Point "I" ,�� '';' 0.103483 66.23 23.3 14.0 78.0 45.9% '."MT @ixim"1111 f�• �i�.� :.gym �niFp 704 UTF-G High Point Aspen Ridge Estates 0.081961 52.46 29.1 17.5 78.0 45.9% 31.1 18.7 75.0 37.8% 705 UTF-G High Point 0.132192 84.60 38.4 23.0 78.0 45.9% 706 UTF-G High Point Chally Farm 0.002241 1.43 5.0 3.0 78.0 45.9% 5.0 2.3 75.0 37.8% 707 UTF-G High Point a ;.d: 0.021391 13.69 14.3 8.6 75.0 37.8% 800 MAS-AA Middle Aux Sable York Wood Estates 0.214414 137.23 62.5 37.5 69.0 21.6% 54.2 32.5 75.0 37.8% 801 MAS-AA Middle Aux Sable ?'p'" 0.000611 0.39 5.0 3.0 78.0 45.9% A,•..•,r "''', ..14 4,air 802 MAS-AA Middle Aux Sable '_:,, 0.052408 33.54 24.0 14.4 75.0 37.8% ......V, Ir 803 MAS-AA Middle Aux Sable 54i,,V 0.271849 173.98 69.9 41.9 70.0 24.3% •�E^ ti s. j, Total Area= 5.79968 F Average= 74.39 F Average= 74.20 Pag°3 0l 3 GAPublidYorkWIe,2005\Y00524 SW Slormwaler SWdy,Eng\Teb_01_Walermhed summery.kls Yorkville Southwest Stormwater Study (Fox Road Area) TABLE NO.2 Peak Runoff Summary Peak Runoff-Q1.4.(cfs) Flow [drainage 100-yr 50-yr 25-yr 10-yr %of Existing %Reduction of Analysis Area Condition 100-yr Existing Condilion Location (aril) Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing roposed "Existi� Pr oposed QP4)Ah '100-yr Q€.®k Condition Condition Condition Condittran Condi - Condition FA-10 0.033 49.9 14.3 36.1 9.9 25.3 6.6 15.1 3.9 28.7% 71.3% FA-20 0.649 528.0 440.4 393.3 330.8 287.8 242.0 186.2 156.6 83.4% 16.6% FA-22 0.116 153.4 117.4 113.5 87.0 81.9 63.3 53.0 41.5 76.5% 23.5% FA-23 0.290 183.1 131.7 137.9 99.3 101.1 73.1 65.8 48.0 71.9% 28.1% FA-30 1.634 1025.4 683.8 765.5 506.7 555.0 364.4 354.1 229.2 66.7% 33.3% FA-31 1.398 872.4 526.2 652.7 390.0 475.3 280.8 305.5 177.7 60.3% 39.7% FA-32 1.312 806.8 469.1 604.1 345.8 440.6 247.8 284.0 156.4 58.1% 41.90 FA-40 2.386 1812.4 1150.9 1364.9 867.0 1001.0 636.0 650.0 413.3 63.5% 36.5% FA41 2.115 1652.2 1017.4 1249.8 770.4 921.3 568.3 602.7 372.1 61.6% 38.4% FA42 0.456 463.0 267.2 351.5 202.5 260.1 149.4 170.9 97.8 57.7% 42.3% FA-43 0.367 384.0 204.1 291.7 155.0 216.1 114.8 142.3 75.7 53.1% 46.9% FA44 1.235 983.8 731.0 743.0 551.4 546.4 404.6 355.9 262.6 74.3% 25.7°% FA-45 0.868 672.6 443.0 508.9 334.9 374.9 247.0 244.5 162.3 65.9% 34.1% FA-46 0.774 603.2 394.3 456.7 297.9 336.5 219.3 219.4 143.4 65.4% 34.6% FA-47 1.556 1186.6 780.5 896.2 589.2 659.5 432.8 431.3 281.5 65.8% 34.2% FA48 1.494 1155.8 779.1 872.1 588.2 640.8 432.1 418.0 281.0 67.4% 32.6% FA-50 0.237 206.0 6.2 153.9 4.7 111.8 3.4 71.5 2.2 3.0% 97.0% FA-60 0.132 142.7 12.9 107.3 8.8 78.6 5.9 50.9 3.4 9.0% 91.0% FA-70 0.461 526.8 320.8 397.9 242.0 293.1 178.0 192.2 116.2 60.9% 39.1% FA-80 0.539 337.9 203.6 244.6 148.1 171.0 104.3 102.9 63.7 60.3% 39.7%IL G:\Public\Yorkville\2005\Y00524 SW Stormwater Study\Eng\final hmsoutput.xls SOUTHWEST STORMWA TER STUDY United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois EXHIBZTS LL C3 fIp Ct Cc:, 15 N pis, IE is E t 10 aAVJOIS -P u en lesun 0 pwY s°COD off n ra m < gar St E LU ux s Raw; < J�; folk eSt —.zl owes do > uewuq p-d Ion 0 F: pAN -h Or Z: 7; Iii lie u (L -1 ss; 1, . ..... 0 de > LL, Q 0-------------------- z w If L U- 7,:: -ro F 0 Ln r sycam cn Qi 0 L Ln .14 C) C) 0 LD 17 co >2 sm, Pa l8LueP13 • ... ...... CD a) in a 0 LU tij C -C CD co (D ko Ln < V Im Ul) c LU E 4-1 0 U) N k Rd glackh S Mks Dr t� Y. `�'"`'� -3-*, L r __ J t+l}n`-°"!� - ±I �r� F r�,hi 4. 'l°.:y"- li •-d 4 'wJ t13{��i�r _ _ - .. - .., � 4. � � � .A � ., • 4� r , ' "•.I;^ �+. +-7 s .. - ram .t.4. - - r� `r_.yp� - � ,c°Q P� - �•' rr, -e_? `��I �,� �4 fi' ar�l _ ,'s i4 -.r_ I }.+•, ,� �� 1",-'f:�{,°�• '� l'�f `'f� ..�� h .t. - - e y' —� F � - �_+ f v � J � It � _pry' _ •{ y .r _ - _ =-r _, —.a. - }:.e y ,:+? �'-r — — "b - - - �a IK Ir I tl� i 'ice. .• ti!I` /!#`-� d•' $� '� _.. r' - � r - >! _ "fit• � _ ..� \, A - ,, lY�r _•-1._. �-- ��r w^- ` B �'; a al��•1 - �^ 4� r.^ `�� - �.. f < - _ it- .t; , -' - - 'r. ►� ' � r ! ♦ J c 9 J Ln Cl P; Lin fu I Cl It Aj AS Ave -. �-v� ( Imo ' I"�• - ` � '. 01, -I � c i Il �l f - � il, I pp r '�1• r ,. �,Y � �� . rarer, �� - A '�-=— � � >° r �. MMHI PM 4 } 1 I •� r I �r � I � k �_ '. .-�'�: � '4,,. •-� � — �' E � _ -o r �r'�.fir�'• R � I - i l �r� �� s s rt �y,grr r I �, _', 3 'v b ®' ��/ `,�.� I ; y /• � ' V LL pO ' ..-t +-' r.`, 1 r '"' ' f •® } ! (�' \ S Y \ y r ♦ ► t 1J II �Y Z '� go Z CY i9 ��f6�-+-'N � Y ti �` n.£ �r i :x•'� rr • �j � � � ; 1 .<. --� _ �'-• Q s� i� � �b � ,� - � ti4-. �£ .t 1.. .. - -- � Y ar I,•' ., I�.•a f�� . e%a � ,\ �� I �f"� J . o: '"�• _ aif�„ '�' �, : ��e: ,fx� _ n o �; i� rt i� `-' � •s _--.�+,--� �i t � C r. y rV �� i`''��,.�"E ;��E.. ��1�� ;+y �•' � i � Y +'+.� y i ` � � (,•-..�. � '� _�� 1 V f I � f � v ( J r I f II i �n / y�4�1 '� y �,° dl j �1 ! e � y CL �l i_/J < < �„ ,� '"+" � �■�, �"-' II `,._„ "'Y �, � f / Jft �. �� _�_ ~- N f�f�� f / I+ 11 h � if 1 `M � � �� • L ,`r ri p `. f U U ' � 9 Q • . ,. r` ``�. s � x t },� F • w? � Y • mP 1 � } • j � o � ui T � • ; r{ i. - i s""M.� ,-i^•_=' � ..L'r :'� � e,✓A iP � . �Ir` ��-,� � �FJ' �� i tom. 1 ` �i', '• f+o°h +� ` 1� cr; � ''� • +�} +s. + ').'.� �'� � 1 � � �> ° � N. C, _ '� ° l h• .'`v rye' Y N CD �A�� //� � - t {� C3 / 0 1' t :,iIt: • • I1fI • r? • L� f / r— Q LL .E uMf Y I - "\ - ` r N tr In 41 E l t •� S C4 o �) ♦ ♦ _ I r ♦ • -cue n` cq 4 L _— r _— `-'� � -=�sax��1'�y ..�t.`J ,t f1 ,�' Yt �ti t / • R .��' � In v CL CD Ln In oss c xY'• M / �� S P, •L L M IF a ® � o v Q C ? 4GN t' J ^ 1 °o� �y �: ' �. N r_`L; \ •` a � 'p1 cn- ;p m 4 N O t m t- on \.. ` R f W Nif r{ r of(��•}�y``� !� }��' - t- eti-:i_� ��%.�'`� !f' r �,.�i E� •-) --Lr_ � ._.��`� �-�-'� -�� ;`-- bl .— 1`h:,�.t 'I, ^4 ! I .�� . - � �.. R�r•� i��1 /� �"�/.� � � :i LR.-� � '} � � {' � �- N \ 1 `� �j m uog - ^I LL IJ ga 4 r ~ 0 0 lmrnarauQl Rp CO `* x a M}lafjr y W X81 ly �� I Hluo W .t naay�t _ aw�wa L•n �,ti� It LL $ 0 a 7 91 0 it d, r a i LL P o If m ¢ w ELI t.r �''�,�" k w•' - �a tea.. ,� � � 1 Y'.. 1 + - "-+ of lL:" JQ` 4. pt b■q @ r - ' C In w ICI 0 OC O * } t0!!I rn M `1 - ;. � w rq Q _ oCD LL� Ow v, U co Ln ol v} Ln O Uc _ _ r W v u' f0 _ j wl IM r 'v d i N C7 r' yLn CD �fu cu j-71A Ln W It LL o° ]asurrg U)co r Batlger 5t L . rr� et�utl} 1 � s m ttP ffl COD W qn ryR a` • 4 'i } •�•ft ; - A � ar C� v }S _ -s iAi�afs Route 47 L ry.. ' a z ' PSI uue�sura� ueNpy - -! ¢ 1A Q H e Lps! c Phi r u i O LV 4 y. G J I fee Waist ti !a W I, g �lyM' '`� tyu� Ra I�f4uob 41� W I > ui m o - u7 eideyA I 0 OL j poP1a " �°a y r W =! a 7 _ (1( Ln M Ln Ln -� O ti 0 Ln t•' ' r r m �, cu Ln p CD L +d+ 0o } Ln 2A v cc f � •x C I _ } Y l Na . . i= P z '� C t > v co 2 o T Or � o W L L rn E N u- m o a� W r` `' l High Point Rd Ln o L .0 x o v z__— gib+. _ c M' m > �e 3 0 t m .� cn d L N x > �+ Q U U W U 2 2 tt I SOUTHWEST STORMWATER STUDY United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois APPENDIX UNDER SEPARATE CODER FOX BROAD SOUTHWESTAREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOVEMBER 2005 PREPARED BY.' oil Engineering Enterprises, Inc, Table of Contents Section Title Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Existing Conditions 1 A. Study Area 1 B. General Roadway Data 1 C. Land Use 5 D. Traffic 5 3. Proposed Collector Road System 5 A. Concept Collector Road System 5 B. Future Traffic Projections 10 C. Intersection Analysis and Roadway Improvements 13 D. Traffic Calming Measures 16 E. Transportation Impact Contributions 16 5. Opinion of Probable Construction Costs 20 6. Summary Recommendations 20 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. TC 1 SUGAR GROVE,IL List of Exhibits Exhibit Title Page 1. Study Area 2 2. Existing Lane Configuration 3 3. Existing ROW 4 4. Existing Traffic Volumes 6 5. Concept Collector Roadway System g 6 Future Traffic Volumes 12 7 Future Lane Configuration 17 8. Traffic Calming Measures 19 List of Tables Table Title Page 1. Study Area Generated Traffic Volumes 10 2. Estimated Directional Distribution 11 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. TC 2 SUGAR GROVE,IL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 1. Introduction 11/05 The area west and south of the Central Business District is largely undeveloped and there are a number of planned and future potential developments that will increase traffic volumes on the area roadways. In order to accommodate the development traffic a well planned roadway system needs to be developed. This study will investigate alternate roadway systems for the area and analyze key intersections to determine the needed roadway improvements due to development and ambient traffic growth from outside the study area. The study will also look at the traffic impacts to Fox Road. 2. Existing Conditions A. Study Area The southwest study area is generally bounded by the Fox River on .the north, IL 71to the south, IL 47 to the east and Highpoint Road to the west. The study area and planned/potential developments are shown in Exhibit 1. The study area is approximately 2.6 miles long by 1.9 miles wide with an area of approximately 5 square miles. The existing east-west streets are Fox Road and IL 71, which are spaced approximately one mile apart. The existing north-south streets are IL 47, Pavillion Road and Highpoint Road. Pavillion Road is approximately 9000' west of IL 47 and Highpoint Road is approximately 4500' west of Pavillion Road. B. General Roadway Data IL 47 is a two lane north-south Strategic Regional Arterial. The roadway runs through the Central Business District and crosses the Fox River just north of downtown. The roadway is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and is signalized at Van Emmon Street, Fox Road, IL 126 and IL 71 IL 71 is a two lane southwest-northeast major arterial and runs through the southern edge of the City. IL 71 is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation. Fox Road is a two lane east-west collector road that runs from Fox River Drive east to IL 47. The roadway is under the jurisdiction of the Kendall County Highway Department and the United City of Yorkville east of Poplar Drive. Green Briar Drive is an east west City of Yorkville collector road running west from its 'tee" intersection at IL 47. The roadway terminates approximately 2500' west of IL 47. Pavillion Road is a two lane north-south Township roadway running between Fox Road and IL 71. The existing lane configurations and traffic control for the study area roadways are shown in Exhibit 2. The existing Right of Way for the major roadways in the study area is shown in Exhibit 3. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 1 SUGAR GROVE,IL " m .:: FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA�• • -^ • N�►�►1111/��Illlllulr J� STUDYAREA 1711., lid jj fill •I' 7 /' �'*�{`� 1111111 p'Bn1 nll Inll �� f *•� �■ ��■ 11'111 -_ �I.�� '�� l �•�,••11 1111 ��11111��__ ��w� �►�•"'��/�:.� lli 11�� I1 JAI ��°� �si��►;� Illll�uul�. ,.�� :r` r 1� 3�� 1■V��a� • y COR ER 0. � • � ,11111•� If� p Vllli�i y •It•11111� ' � R �1. N -ter • -Tw,� � .,• VAN N EMMON STREET +A -� r EXHIBIT 2 1'" FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION �-- TRAVEL LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL -4F- STOP SIGN �r FO J I GREEN BRIAR DR. �l 3 9 � G 'OZ 3 � y } , 3 �° COPYRIGHT© 2005 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 0 PATH—H• mo6oe NC ro03o604 3 a NJ FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA . • �t��..�i�111/IIIIII�� r MSTING ROW �� .■mil - :- � u1/ m,1 wd 1".. I��Z,p.; ►I��7 C/.�M�� nn o/11nn e 11111 III Ilq( �—= �,�� u�11,1 'O.–❑ ii ■ 1� • �• j:'■ +�,�`�tix4►��jr�►�_wp! r- ' u• -� III%� �:.i/::�,�1�1 c�CILL'.L 1 ► � r ' ,.• -.• �iW�1 Ufillll • - �i11i1•� L F 10 1111111♦ '�� .� LEGEND STUDY AREA 1 ROW 7W ROW 80'ROW 1 „ 120'Ro ♦��i' _ 13W ROW i4W ROW FA UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 C. Land Use The majority of the land in the study area is currently farmland. The IL 47 corridor is largely developed with commercial uses and there are existing residential subdivisions to the east of IL 47. D. Traffic Manual turning movement counts were conducted in June, 2005 at the following intersections. 11 47 at Van Emmon Street I L 47 at Fox Road IL 47 at Green Briar Drive IL 47 at IL 71 IL 71 at Pavillion Road IL 71 at Highpoint Road (east) Pavillion Road at Fox Road The counts were conducted on a weekday from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The area schools were not in session during the time the counts were conducted. The eastbound to northbound left turn movement during the AM peak period at the Fox Road/ IL 47 and the IL 47/Van Emmon Street intersections was increased by 15% to account for the lack of school traffic. The weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 4. Follow up traffic counts will be conducted to verify traffic volumes when school is in session. Mechanical traffic counts were also conducted on IL 47, IL 71 and Fox Road to determine the hourly traffic by direction and the daily two way traffic. The daily traffic volumes are also shown on Figure 4. The raw traffic count data for both the mechanical and turning movement counts can be seen in the appendix. 3. Proposed Collector Road System A. Concept Collector Road System As the parcels in the study develop, an internal roadway system will need to be established to move traffic to and from the subdivisions to the area collectors and arterials. The future land uses in the study area will be predominantly single family residential. An area roadway network was developed and minor access locations were also identified. The concept road system was developed to provide an alternate access to IL 47 and to minimize future traffic volume increases on Fox Road, particularly east of White Oak Way and at its intersection with IL 47. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 5 SUGAR GROVE,IL o�^ NCO V AT �so ' — -1 �2a57 SR ET i5 N (70) 0� r 1(20) 10, (10) N' EXHIBIT 4 FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA _ S j N TRANSPORTATION STUDY EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES L-10 (25) XX — AM PEAK HOUR --5 (35} (XX) — PM PEAK HOUR f5 15 XXX — AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC f (110) 140- } �20 15—x. 1 45 45� M N �Go o 0 FO a rn n r GREEN BRIAR DR. 6�9 6� (55) 75-j v `6 �l J 15 20 g ' L. <OO �Nt vv (65) In go Nj ��g5 �9�, r I �r Z� 105 145- o f1 , „ �155� 300-- or r (15) 10� J I (ot��Js oz � do 4 COPYRIGHT©2005 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. `131 'AO t PATH-H: y005W NC Y0090l04 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 The concept plan provides for two north-south collectors between IL 47 and Pavillion Road. The north-south collectors provide a direct connection between Fox Road and IL 71. The eastern north-south collector follows the Beecher Road extension alignment and connects to IL 71 opposite the Harris Forest Preserve access drive, which may require a slight realignment, which also needs safety improvements regardless. The connection to IL 71 was originally conceived to be through the portion of the Meadowbrook Homes site that is contiguous to IL 71, however; this would place the access drive too close to Walsh Drive and would not be in conformance with IDOT policies. The eastern collector road should not have direct driveway access. Access should only be provided from other dedicated streets. The western collector is aligned opposite Highpoint Road at IL 71 and opposite Fox Glen Drive at Fox Road. This collector road passes along the eastern edge of the future elementary/middle school site and continues north through the Silver Fox development. The roadway is recommended to be a "no load" collector road from IL 71 to Green Briar Drive. A review of the traffic volumes north of Green Briar Drive indicate the daily traffic volumes will be less than 2500 vehicles, which indicates that this portion of the roadway could be accessed by individual driveways. It is anticipated that the north-south collectors will be constructed as development occurs along the corridor. A new east-west collector is proposed to connect from Pavillion Road to existing Green Briar Drive. The roadway travels through the Meadowbrook development west along the southern edge of the Silver Fox development and connects to Pavillion Road approximately 2300' south of Fox Road. The connection to Green Briar Drive is the only opportunity to provide an additional access point to IL 47 from the study area due to existing development along the IL 47 corridor. It would be beneficial to construct this collector in its entirety from Green Briar Drive to Pavillion Road in conjunction with the Aspen Ridge, Evergreen Farm, Silver Fox and Meadowbrook developments. This would allow for additional (or construction) access other than Fox Road, particularly for the Evergreen Farm and Silver Fox developments. We recommend that heavy construction traffic be prohibited on Fox Road between IL 47 and Fox Glen Drive. Depending on the final location of the Green Briar Drive intersection with Pavillion Road, it may be beneficial to locate the proposed Aspen Ridge entrance at this intersection. West of Pavillion Road in the study area there is not a need for a continuous north-south "no load" collector, but street continuity should be planned for as development occurs. A "no load" collector is not needed due to the proximity of Pavillion Road and Highpoint Road. The collector road system is shown in Exhibit 5. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 7 SUGAR GROVE, IL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 General Alignment Considerations The alignments are general in nature and minor shifts in the alignments can be made to accommodate development site planning without sacrificing the efficiency of the street system as a whole. The connections of the collector roads to the major area streets should be maintained as shown in Exhibit 5. Other Future Roadway Improvements IDOT is in the process of preparing Phase 2 design plans for the widening of IL 47 from IL 71 north to Carpenter Street. The widening will provide for two through lanes of traffic in each direction and a center median for separate left turn lanes at cross streets and access drives. Based on the results of this study, the City Engineer has submitted a request to IDOT requesting signalization of the Route 47/Green Briar Drive intersection. Signalization of this intersection is thus a concurrent recommendation of this study. A.portion of the future Eldamain Road corridor is in the northwest corner of the study area running through the Fox River Bluffs development. It is anticipated that the Eldamain project will be completed within the build out time frame of the study area and was considered in the study. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 8 SUGAR GROVE,IL .Y A° r a FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY COLLECTOR ROAD SYSTEM NO IV r, S , `� ion. N M!�P�,� •, ,J; ,f FC 1 s a ail•�W�li><f� -� •. �-. �� 'i�[�► A-.yam�� -,� w ti41 LEGEND ° i.c, -'"fit - j.. ��. 'k„ ��i � :�•• STUDY p � PROPOSED • • ti r'Yr s ,� COLLECTOR PROPOSED 7 MINOR i RS�if' COLLECTOR ALTERNATE DE 0 ALIGNMENT AN ELDAMAIN'r;f' f• r TAIL, EXTENSION 4( TENTIAL • ACCESS .. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 B. Future Traffic Projections Future traffic volumes were projected for the key intersections in the study area, which will be used to determine the appropriate geometry for these intersections. The traffic projections for the morning and evening peak hours were based on the existing peak hour traffic, study area development site traffic and background traffic growth from development outside the study area. The trip generation for the planned and potential development in the study area was based on the number of dwelling units per site plans, where available and 1.8 dwelling units per acre for parcels without development plans. The Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual ;"h Edition was used to estimate the number of trips that would be generated by the planned and potential developments in the study area. The study area generated traffic is shown in Table 1. Table 1 Study Area Generated Traffic Volumes AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Parcel In Out Total In Out Total Fox River Bluffs 335 Single Family 65 195 260 210 125 335 Fox River Bluffs 120 Townhouse 10 50 60 45 25 70 Silver Fox 178 Single Family 35 100 135 115 65 180 Meadowbrook 342 Single Family 250 60 310 205 120 325 Evergreen Farm 112 Single Family 90 20 110 75 45 120 Chally Farm 144 Single Family 110 30 140 95 55 150 Anderson Farm 420 Single Family 75 225 300 245 145 390 Aspen Ridge 217 Single Family 40 120 160 135 80 215 Cornerstone 61 Single Family 15 40 55 45 25 70 Villas at the Preserve 78 Duplex 10 35 45 35 15 50 Area 1 434-Ac. 717 Single Family 130 385 515 400 235 635 Area 2 25 Ac. 42 Single Family 10 30 40 30 20 50 Area 3 85 Ac. 154 Single Family 30 90 120 100 60 160 Area 4 138 Ac. 248 Single Family 45 135 180 155 85 240 Area 5 448 Ac. 811 Single Family 145 435 580 445 260 705 Total 1045 1905 1 2950 2280 1335 3615 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 10 SUGAR GROVE,IL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 From the development plans and other areas of developable land, the study area could contain over 3800 dwelling units and generate 30,000 daily vehicle trips. These projected daily vehicle trips are in excess of the existing daily volumes currently on IL 47. As seen in Table 2 the study area will generate over 2900 trips and 3600 trips during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. In order to project future turning movement traffic volumes at the key study area intersections, the directional distribution of development traffic entering and exiting the study area was estimated. The directional distribution was primarily based on the existing commuter travel patterns in the area, which was determined from the turning movement counts conducted at the study area intersections. The directional distribution for the study area is shown in Table 2. T able 2 Estimated Directional Distribution Street Direction Percentage Arrive Depart IL 47 North 40% 40% IL 47 South 15% 15% IL 71 East 25% 25% IL 71 West 15% 15% Fox Road West 5% 5% The estimated build out of the study area is approximately 15 years, or the year 2020. There will be other area growth outside the study area and to account for this other traffic growth, the existing traffic volumes along IL 47 and IL 71 were increased by 3% per year for the 15 year time frame. The 3% growth per year is similar to the percent increase IDOT used to forecast traffic volumes on IL 47 for their roadway improvement project. The site generated traffic was assigned to the existing/proposed street network based on the directional distribution shown in Table 2 and the estimated site traffic shown in Table 1. The existing traffic factored for growth and the site traffic were combined to determine the total traffic volumes for the study area. The future traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 6. As is the case today the majority of the future traffic is destined to and from the north on IL 47 and the available roads to access IL 47 are Fox Road, Green Briar Drive and IL 71. These roadways will experience increases in traffic volumes due to development in the southwest area, specifically left turns onto northbound IL 47 in the morning peak hour. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 11 SUGAR GROVE,IL Lo °moo L-6 0 85 VAN EMM0N '� (— ~1520 E) I STREET / 2s (140) 135-.7 (20) 10, (10) '� r EXHIBIT 6 ^� FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY No FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES XX — AM PEAK HOUR �5 S(25) (XX) — PM PEAK HOUR l' f-5 (15) — LESS THAN FIVE VEHICLES (1520 225-J �O r r ° ll0l (1453 45�-� ..:� _A o '< y O O 0o min GREEN BRIAR DR. 95' r-ro �� 135 245-1 a Ql5k �O� � r �� 150� 210 t D �'Lo1 C� o.o v Z ^ M C) 5) �O J D �45 (2g0)5, �I =1345 19 7 to X 1 J./o D 1Z�71 260 385-j 0!! J r ' o �� ` 165 225-1 c'-- 5)cil �` f y r-r- -o (s m Oyu l $ COPYRIGHT© 2005 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 0�h PA74-Ik roo5os Nc------- UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 C. Intersection Analyses and Roadway Improvements The major intersections in the study area were analyzed to determine what roadway improvements would be needed to accommodate the future traffic volumes from development in the southwest area. The future traffic volumes at the intersections were tested to determine if traffic signals would be warranted within the time frame of the study. 1. IL 47 at Van Emmon Street Illinois 47 is currently a 3-lane cross section with exclusive left turn lanes. Van Emmon Street provides for one lane in each direction with parking. MOT is proposing to widen IL 47 to a 5-lane cross section to provide two through lanes in each direction with separate left turn lanes. Typically, signalized intersections provide separate left turn lanes for each approach. With the proposed/planned development to the west on Fox Road the future traffic generated by the developments is anticipated to use both Fox Road and Van Emmon Street to access IL 47. The predominate traffic movements would be the eastbound to northbound left turn and the southbound to westbound right turn. The capacity analyses conducted at the intersection indicate that providing separate eastbound and westbound left turn lanes would improve intersection operations reducing delay on Van Emmon Street. 2. IL 47 at Fox Road IL 47 is currently a 3-lane cross section with exclusive left turn lanes and Fox Road is currently a 2-lane cross section. IL 47 is proposed to be widened to a 5-lane cross section. The City has requested IDOT to revise their widening plans to include separate left turn lanes on Fox Road. 3. IL 47 at Green Briar Drive IL 47 is currently a 3-lane cross section with a northbound exclusive left turn lane and a southbound exclusive right-turn lane. Green Briar Drive's eastern terminus is currently at Illinois 47. Green Briar Drive is striped for exclusive left and right turn lanes, and a single inbound lane. The intersection is currently not signalized, but the future 2020 volumes warrant a signal, based on both the 4 hour and the peak hour warrants. The MOT improvements will add a through lane in each direction on IL 47 and eliminate the existing southbound right turn lane. IDOT is not proposing any improvements on Green Briar Drive. The peak hour capacity analyses indicate that the intersection can operate at an acceptable level of service with the proposed geometry. Signalization will likely be needed when the roadway is extended west to Pavillion Road and should be included in the IDOT improvement project. Signalization of this intersection is thus a concurrent recommendation of this study. 4. IL 47 at IL 71 Illinois 47 is currently a 4-lane cross section, with exclusive left- and right-turn lanes for the north and south approaches. Illinois 71 is currently a 3-lane ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 13 SUGAR GROVE,IL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 cross section, with exclusive left-turn lanes and one through lane in each direction. To accommodate the year 2020 traffic volumes the capacity analyses indicate that IL 71 will require two through lanes in each direction and separate eastbound and westbound right turn lanes. In addition separate northbound and southbound right turn lanes will be needed on IL 47. 5. IL 71 at North-South East Collector-Forest Preserve Access The intersection is proposed to be located approximately '/2 mile west of Illinois 47. The lane configuration for the collector road will be 1 inbound lane and 2 outbound lanes, striped for exclusive left and right turn lanes. The Forest Preserve access should be widened to provide a northbound left turn lane. Illinois 71 should be widened to accommodate eastbound and westbound exclusive left-turn lanes, and a westbound exclusive right-turn lane. A preliminary traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted for the intersection and the analysis indicated that the peak-hour warrant and the 4- hour warrant could be met. 6. IL 71 at Highpoint Road This intersection currently exists as a tee intersection to the south with stop control on Highpoint Road. The collector road should be aligned opposite Highpoint Road with separate left turn lanes for all approaches and right turn lanes for the southbound and westbound approaches. The future traffic volumes indicate that the peak hour warrant and the 4-hour warrant can be satisfied. As development occurs the traffic volumes at the intersection should be monitored to determine when traffic signal warrants could be satisfied. 7. IL 71 at Pavillion Road This intersection is currently a tee intersection with Pavillion Road's southern terminus at Illinois 71. The intersection is stop-controlled on Pavillion Road, and is located about 11/2 miles west of Illinois 47. Illinois 71 is a 2-lane, 2-way road at this intersection with an exclusive westbound right-turn lane. The intersection should be widened to accommodate an exclusive eastbound left- turn lane, but will maintain one through lane. Pavillion Road should be widened to a three-lane section, with 1 inbound lane and 2 outbound lanes striped for left and right turn lanes. The peak hour warrant and 4 hour warrant can be satisfied based on the future traffic projections. 8. Fox Road at Pavillion Road This intersection is stop-controlled on Pavillion Road. Both Fox Road and Pavillion Road are 2-lane, 2-way roads at this intersection. Signal warrants were not satisfied for this intersection based on the future traffic projections. An exclusive westbound left-turn lane should be provided, as well as an exclusive eastbound right-turn lane. Pavillion Road will be widened to provide 1 inbound lane and 2 outbound lanes striped for left and right turn lanes. The geometry of Pavillion Road approach to Fox Road should be modified to comply with City design standards. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 14 SUGAR GROVE,IL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 9. Fox Road at North-South West Collector The collector road is proposed to be aligned opposite Fox Glen Drive (east) at Fox Road. The collector should have a 3-lane section and be striped for 2 outbound lanes, a separate left and a combination through right lane at Fox Road. Fox Road will provide exclusive left-turn lanes in each direction. Signal warrants are not met at this intersection and the north and south legs should be under stop control. 10. Fox Road at North-South East Collector This intersection does not currently exist. Fox Road through this area is a 2- lane, 2-way road, but will be widened to accommodate exclusive left turn lanes. The collector road will be striped for 2 outbound lanes and 1 inbound lane. The right lane on the collector road will be a combination through-right lane, when development occurs north of Fox Road. Signal warrants are met for this intersection and 2-way stop control on the collector road should be implemented. 11. Fox Road In addition to the intersection improvements along Fox Road that were previously described, the roadway is recommended to be improved by resurfacing and some reconstruction from the City limits east to IL 47 due to the poor pavement condition. A cost estimate for this road work is included in the appendix. A review of the horizontal curve on Fox Road was also conducted to determine if additional improvements are needed to meet current IDOT design standards per the 2002 Bureau of Design and Environment Manual. The curve has a normal crown section with a radius of 353' and Fox Road in this section has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. These roadway attributes do meet the current IDOT design criteria. The roadway is properly designed and does not require an increase in the radius of the curve or the implementation of superelevation. To better define the centerline of the roadway, particularly in inclement weather, raised pavement markings could be installed as part of the resurfacing of the road. The future lane configurations and traffic control for the study area intersections are shown in Exhibit 7. 12. Additionally, the new intersections created by the western extension of Green Briar Drive will likely require stop controls, as signal warrants will not be met. The nature of these stop controls, i.e., which legs of the intersections will be stop controlled and which may be thru traffic, will be determined by development patterns, school and park locations, traffic flow and safety considerations. Interim control measures will undoubtedly be necessary. Use of landscaped medians, traffic circles at intersections and reduced posted speed limits are all appropriate types of traffic calming measures that will be considered during the roadway design phase of these transportation improvements. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 15 SUGAR GROVE, IL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 D. Traffic Calming Measures As a result of the potential development in the southwest area there will be increased traffic volumes on Fox Road and Van Emmon Street and traffic calming measures could be used to lessen the volume of traffic on these roadways. The potential volume control measures consist of full closures, half closures, median barriers and forced turn islands. These measures are described below: ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 16 SUGAR GROVE,IL VAN �k N STEM N all EXHIBIT 7 ,k FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY FUTURE LANE CONFIGURATION * EXIST FUTURE I 4-- a TRAVEL LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL T —07 STOP SIGN RO '� Q �k X26 IDOT IMPROVEMENTS FOB �\( O0 J I � o� J J. L T .00 GREEN BRIAR DR. cn o � .o O 74 o IL ji gl a � g y m 3 g COPYRIGHT©2005 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC, m 7 PATH--K- SD 1'00506 WC YOOS0804 4 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 Full Closure As the name implies, a full closure completely closes the street to through vehicular traffic, resulting in a cul de sac. The street would normally remain open to pedestrians and bicyclists. Full closures are most commonly used as a cure for cut-through traffic on local streets. Half Closure Half closures block travel in one direction creating a one way street for a short distance. They are also called partial closures or one way closures. Half closures can be placed mid block or at intersections. There is a tendency for motorists once on a street to go around a short barrier, but drivers are reluctant to travel in the wrong direction at distances such as 50' or longer. Diagonal Diverters These are barriers that are placed diagonally across an intersection. The diagonal median blocks the through movements for each approach to the intersection. Forced Turn Islands These are raised islands that block certain movements on approaches to intersections. The most common application is to force right turn movements. Pictorial examples of the different volume control measures can be seen in the appendix. Fox Road Applications A number of these volume control measures could be used on Fox Road to minimize the traffic volumes near IL 47. The most likely location to implement the measures would be at the Fox Road intersection with the N-S East Collector Road (Beecher Road extension). However, controls at this location are only feasible with a completed Beecher Road between US 34 and IL 71. Placement of the volumes control measures at other locations would require further study and public input. Conceptual sketches of the three viable traffic calming measures are shown in Exhibit B. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 18 SUGAR GROVE,IL N EXHIBIT 8 FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES FOX ROAD J .c y + v z FORCEd TURN L n a r i FOX ROAD FOX ROAD f t 5 J J Z i a h } � h � 6 � � W Z Z FULL CLOSURE HALF CLOSURE FCOPYRIGHT®2005 ENGINEERING WERPRISM INC. t UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 E. Transportation Impact Contributions One obvious consideration regarding the number of recommended improvements in this study is the funding of them. The City's standard practice of assessing all new developments a transportation improvement contribution of $2,000 per housing unit is laudable and should be the funding source utilized for all of the recommended improvements. Since acquisition of these funds is related to the respective progress of the platting of these new developments, certain developers may need to be asked to front fund some of the improvements with credit towards future housing units they plat and/or subject to recapture agreements for recovery of future contributions by other developers. It is recommended that the $2,000 per unit contributions be credited towards the right of way and road construction costs of the no load (without driveways) collectors, the Fox Road improvements between Route 47 and Rivers Edge Subdivision and the signalization of the Green Briar Drive/Route 47 intersection. The initial phase of these improvements is recommended to be the resurfacing of Fox Road and the western extension of Green Briar Drive to the currently proposed developments. 4. Opinion of Probable Construction Cost The primary roadway that should be constructed initially is the East-West Collector, i.e. Green Briar Drive. The basic cross section of the roadway is one through lane in each direction and a center median used for left turn lanes at intersections. This cross section can either be; 1. a straight 40' B-B section or 2. a boulevard type section with a 20' B-B through lane in each direction and a 14' B-B center median. Costs were estimated on a per foot basis for all the cross sections, which are shown below: Cross Section 1 $445/Foot Cross Section 2 $492/Foot A detailed estimate is shown in Appendix. 5. Summary Recommendations The southwest area is largely undeveloped and served by a limited number of roadways. The planned and potential developments in the area will generate a significant amount of traffic in the near future and an area roadway system is needed to efficiently service the additional traffic generated by construction activities and new residents. A collector road system was developed for the southwest area to accommodate the future area development traffic. The future traffic volumes anticipated to be generated by development were estimated and added to the existing traffic factored for ambient growth from development outside the study area. These future total volumes were analyzed and recommendations were formulated for the key intersections in the study area. The recommendations included traffic lane additions and appropriate traffic control such as signalization. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 20 SUGAR GROVE,IL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOX ROAD SOUTHWEST AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 11/05 Traffic calming measures were investigated to determine which volume control measures would be appropriate to minimize future traffic volumes on Fox Road near IL 47. The appropriate measures and potential locations for implementation were identified. The findings of this study should be used to coordinate development activities and to facilitate the implementation of the proposed collector road system. This will ensure that improvements to the existing roadways and the new roadway system needed to accommodate future traffic will be in place before it is needed. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. PAGE 21 SUGAR GROVE,IL APPENDIX Cost Estimates Traffic Count Data Capacity Analyses Traffic Signal Warrant Analyses Traffic Calming Examples PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOX ROAD-RESURFACE(11/2-SURFACE,2 W2'BINDER,FULL WIDTH MILL,AGG.SHOULDERS) FROM CITY CORPORATE LIMITS TO IL 47 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS ITEM UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 BIT.CONCRETE SURF.COURSE,SUPERPAVE,MIX-D',N50(BIKE PATH) TON 0.0 $ 37.00 $ _ 2 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,SUPERPAVE,MIX'D',N50 TON 700.0 39.00 27,300.00 3 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,SUPERPAVE,IL-19.0,N50 TON 1,100.0 37.00 40,700,00 4 AGGREGATE FOR TEMPORARY ACCESS TON 250,0 13.00 3,250.00 5 jEARTH EXCAVATION CU.YD. 0.0 13.00 _ 6 GEOTECHNICAL FABRIC FOR GROUND STABILIZATION SO.YD. 0.0 1.50 - 7 POROUS GRANULAR EMBANKMENT TON 0.0 30.00 - 8 TRENCH BACKFILL CU.YD. 0.0 20.00 _ 9 SEEDING CLASS 2A ACRE 0.0 1,200.00 _ 10 NITROGEN FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POUND 0.0 2.00 _ 11 PHOSPHOROUS FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POUND 0.0 2.00 _ 12 POTASSIUM FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POUND 0.0 2.00 _ 13 TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE,4' SO.YD. 0.0 2.00 _ 14 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SO.YD. 0.0 1.50 _ 15 EARTH EXCAVATON FOR EROSION CONTROL CU.YD_ 50.0 50.00 2,500,00 16 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING POUND 100.0 4.00 400,00 17 TEMPORA RY DITCH CHECKS EACH 0.0 90,00 _ 18 PERIMETER EROSION BARRIER FOOT 0.0 1.75 19 INLET AND PIPE PROTECTION EACH 0.0 90.00 20 SUB-BASE GRANULAR MATERIAL,TYPE B TON 0.0 12.50 _ 21 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS(PRIME COAT) GAL 3,615.0 1.00 3,615.00 22 AGGREGATE(PRIME COAT) TON 7,0 20.00 140.00 23 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK,5' SO.FT. 0.0 3.50 _ 24 STORM SEWERS,CLASS A,TYPE 1 12' FOOT 0.0 25.00 _ 25 STORM SEWERS,CLASS A,TYPE 1 18' FOOT 0.0 27.00 - 26 STORM SEWERS,CLASS A,TYPE 124' FOOT 0.0 30.00 27 CATCH BASINS,TYPE A.4'DIA.,TYPE 3 FRAME AND GRATE EACH 0.0 1,100.00 _ 28 MANHOLES,TYPE A,4'-DIA.,TYPE 1 FRAME,CLOSED LID EACH 0.0 1,250.00 29 INLETS,TYPE A,TYPE 3 FRAME AND GRATE EACH 0.0 1,000.00 _ ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SUGAR GROVE,ILLINOIS PAGE 1 OF 2 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE FOX ROAD-RESURFACE(1 112"SURFACE,2112'BINDER,FULL WIDTH MILL,AGG.SHOULDERS) FROM CITY CORPORATE LIMITS TO IL 47 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS ITEM UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT mmmmm�30 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE B-6.18 FOOT 0.0 11.00 _ 31 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION LSUM 1.0 5 000 00 5,00000 32 SHORT TERM PAVEMENT MARKING FOOT 500.0 3.00 1,500.00 33 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 4' FOOT 10,000.0 0.25 2,500.00 34 WORK ZONE PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL SO.Ff. 170.0 2.00 340,00 35 SIGN PANEL-TYPE 1 SO.FT. 0.0 15.00 - 36 TELESCOPING STEEL SIGN POST FOOT 0.0 10.00 _ 37 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LETTERS AND SYMBOLS SO.FT. 250.0 2.50 625.00 38 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 4' FOOT 10,000.0 0.40 4,000,00 39 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 6' FOOT 2,000.0 0.65 1,300.00 40 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 24' FOOT 500.0 250 12W.00 41 ELECTRIC SERVICE INSTALLATION EACH 0.0 750.00 _ 42 CONDUIT IN TRENCH,2-DIA.,PVC FOOT 0.0 5.00 _ 43 TRENCH AND BACKFILL FOR ELECTRICAL WORK FOOT 0.0 2.00 - 44 ELECTRIC CABLE IN TRENCH,600V(XLP=TYPE USE)1/C NO.10 FOOT 0.0 0.75 _ 45 ELECTRIC CABLE IN TRENCH,600V(XLP=TYPE USE)1/C NO.6 FOOT 0.0 0.75 _ 46 STREETLIGHT,COMPLETE EACH 0.0 3,000.00 _ 47 PARKWAY TREES EACH 0.0 400. _ 48 IMEDIAN LANDSCAPING LSUM 0.0 0.00 _ 49 RESTORATION SO YD 2,230.0 3.50 7,805,00 50 RAISED REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS EACH 70.0 25.00 1,750,00 51 AGGREGATE SHOULDERS TON 390.0 1400 5,46000 52 BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVAL,2 INCH SO YD 7,230.0 2.00 14,460.00 53 CLASS D PATCHES,TYPE IV,6 INCH SO YD 1,810.0 30.00 54,300.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 178,195.00 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING(16%) $ 26,511.20 MATERIAL TESTING(4%) $ 7,127.60 ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL $ 213,634.00 ESTIMATED COST PER LINEAR FOOT (rounded up to nearest dollar) $ 86.00 GAPublc\YorkvI0e\2005\Y00506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Enffox Road cost esOmate.xis)cost per foot worksheet-BLVD1 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SUGAR GROVE,ILLINOIS PAGE 2 OF 2 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE GREENBRIAR ROAD-BOULEVARD SECTION(20-B-8,14' B-B,20'B-B) FROM PAVILLION TO EXISTING GREENBRIER- 7,372 LF UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS ITEM UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 JBIT.CONCRETE SURF.COURSE,SUPERPAVE,MIX'D',N50(BIKE PATH) TON 1,000.0 $ 37.00 $ 37,000.00 2 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,SUPERPAVE,MIX-D',N50 TON 2,300.0 37.00 85,100.00 3 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,SUPERPAVE,IL-19.0,N50 TON 12,100.0 35.00 423,500.00 4 JAGGREGATE FOR TEMPORARY ACCESS TON 500.0 1300 65M.00 5 EARTH EXCAVATION CU.YD. 30,100.0 13.00 391,300.00 6 GEOTECHNICAL FABRIC FOR GROUND STABILIZATION SO.YD. 26,220.0 1.50 39,330,00 7 POROUS GRANULAR EMBANKMENT TON 4,590.0 30.00 137,700.00 8 TRENCH BACKFILL CU.YD. 500.0 20.00 c 10,000.00 9 SEEDING CLASS 2A ACRE 8.01 1,200.00 9,600.00 10 NITROGEN FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POUND 720.0 2.00 1,440.00 11 PHOSPHOROUS FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POUND 720.0 2.00 1,440.00 12 POTASSIUM FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POUND 720.0 2.D0 1,440.00 13 TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE,4' SQ.YD 38,720.0 200 77,44000 14 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SO.YD. 38,720.0 1.50 58,080.00 15 EARTH EXCAVATION FOR EROSION CONTROL CU.YD. 50.0 50.00 2,500.00 16 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING POUND 500.0 4.00 2,000.00 17 TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS EACH 20.0 90.00 11800,00 18 PERIMETER EROSION BARRIER FOOT 1g744.0 1.75 25,802,00 19 INLET AND PIPE PROTECTION EACH 96.0 90,00 8,640.00 20 SUB-BASE GRANULAR MATERIAL,TYPE B TON 28,100.0 12.50 351,250,00 21 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS(PRIME COAT) GAL 13,110.0 1.00 13,110.00 22 AGGREGATE(PRIME COAT) TON 26.0 20.00 520.00 23 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK,5' SO.FT. 36,860.0 3.50 129,010.00 24 STORM SEWERS,CLASS A,TYPE 112- FOOT 1,640.0 25.00 41,000.00 25 STORM SEWERS,CLASS A,TYPE 1 18' FOOT 2,950.0 27.00 79,650.00 26 STORM SEWERS,CLASS A.TYPE 1 24' FOOT 4,430.0 30.00 132,900.00 27 CATCH BASINS,TYPE A,4'DIA.,TYPE 3 FRAME AND GRATE EACH 32.01 1,100 00 35,2DO 00 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SUGAR GROVE,ILLINOIS PAGE 1 OF 2 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE GREENBRIAR ROAD-BOULEVARD SECTION(20'B-B,14'B-B,20'B-B) FROM PAVILLION TO EXISTING GREENBRIER- 7,372 LF UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS ITEM UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 28 MANHOLES,TYPE A,4'-DIA.,TYPE 1 FRAME,CLOSED LID EACH 32.01 1,250.00 40,000.00 29 INLETS,TYPE A,TYPE 3 FRAME AND GRATE EACH 32.0 1,OD0.00 32,000.00 30 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE B-6.18 FOOT 29,490.0 11.00 324,390,00 31 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION LSUM 1.0 6,500.00 6,500.00 32 SHORT TERM PAVEMENT MARKING FOOT 1,500.0 3.00 4,500.00 33 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 4' FOOT 29,500.0 0.25 7,375.00 34 WORK ZONE PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL SO.FT. 500.0 2.00 1,000.00 35 SIGN-PANEL-TYPE 1 SO.FT. 360.0 15.00 5,400.00 36 TELESCOPING STEEL SIGN POST FOOT 900.0 10.00 9,000,00 37 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LETTERS AND SYMBOLS So.FT. 740.0 2.50 1,650.00 38 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 4' FOOT 0.0 0.40 - 39 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 6' FOOT 5,900.0 0.65 3,835.00 40 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 24' FOOT 1,480.0 250 3,70000 41 ELECTRIC SERVICE INSTALLATION EACH 1.0 750.00 750.00 42 CONDUIT IN TRENCH,2-DIA.,PVC FOOT 1,200.0 5.00 6,000.00 43 TRENCH AND BACKFILL FOR ELECTRICAL WORK FOOT 8,600,0 2.00 17,200.00 44 ELECTRIC CABLE IN TRENCH,600V(XLP=TYPE USE)1/C NO.10 FOOT 8,600.0 0.75 6,450.00 45 ELECTRIC CABLE IN TRENCH,600V(XLP=TYPE USE)1/C NO.6 FOOT 17,200.0 0.75 6,450.00 46 STREETLIGHT,COMPLETE EACH 63.0 3,000.00 189,000.00 47 PARKWAY TREES EACH 300.0 400.00 120,000.00 48 MEDIAN LANDSCAPING LSUM 1.0 129,100.00 129,100.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 3,017,752.00 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING(16%) $ 482,840.32 MATERIAL TESTING(4%) $ 120,710.08 ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL $ 3,621,302.40 ESTIMATED COST PER LINEAR FOOT (rounded up to nearest dollar) $ 422.00 G.,\Public\Yorkville\2005\YO0506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Eng\[Fox Road cost esdmate.xls]cost per toot worksheet-BLVD1 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SUGAR GROVE,ILLINOIS PAGE 2 OF 2 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE GREENBRIAR ROAD-40'B-B FROM PAVILLION TO EXISTING GREENBRIER- 7,372 LF UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS ITEM UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 BIT.CONCRETE SURF.COURSE,SUPERPAVE,MIX-D',N50(BIKE PATH) TON 1,000.0 $ 37.00 $ 37,00000 2 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE,SUPERPAVE,MIX-D',N50 TON 2,600.0 37.00 96,200.00 3 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE BINDER COURSE,SUPERPAVE,IL-19.0,N50 TON 13,600.0 35.00 476,000.00 4 AGGREGATE FOR TEMPORARY ACCESS TON 500.0 13.00 6,500.00 5 EARTH EXCAVATION CU.YD. 30,000.0 13.00 390,000,00 6 GEOTECHNICAL FABRIC FOR GROUND STABILIZATION SO.YD. 29,490.0 1.50 44,235.00 7 POROUS GRANULAR EMBANKMENT TON 5,170.0 30.00 155,100.00 8 TRENCH BACKFILL CU.YD. 400.0 20.00 8,000.00 9 SEEDING CLASS 2A ACRE 8.0 1,200.00 9,600,00 10 NITROGEN FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POUND 720.0 2,00 1,44000 11 IPHOSPHOROUS FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POUND 720.0 2.00 1,440.00 12 POTASSIUM FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POUND 720.0 2.00 1,440.00 13 TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE,4' SO.YD. 38,720.0 2.00 77,440.00 14 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SO.YD. 38,720.0 1.50 58,080.00 15 EARTH EXCAVATION FOR EROSION CONTROL CU.YD. 50.0 50.00 2,500,00 16 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING POUND 500.0 4.00 2,000.00 17 TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS EACH 20.0 90.00 1,800,00 18 PERIMETER EROSION BARRIER FOOT 14,744.0 1.75 25,802.00 19 INLET AND PIPE PROTECTION EACH 96.0 90.00 8,640.00 20 SUB-BASE GRANULAR MATERIAL,TYPE B TON 29,000.0 12 362,50000 21 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS(PRIME COAT) GAL 14,745.0 1.00 14,745.00 22 AGGREGATE(PRIME COAT) TON 29,0 20.00 580.00 23 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK,5- SO.FT. 36,860.0 3.50 129,010.00 24 STORM SEWERS,CLASS A,TYPE 112" FOOT 1,320.0 25.00 33,000,00 25 STORM SEWERS,CLASS A,TYPE 1 18' FOOT 2,9150.0 2700 79,85000 26 STORM SEWERS,CLASS A,TYPE 124" FOOT 4,430.0 30.00 132,900.00 27 CATCH BASINS,TYPE A,4-DIA.,TYPE 3 FRAME AND GRATE EACH 32.0 1110000 35,20000 28 MANHOLES,TYPE A,4'-DIA.,TYPE 1 FRAME,CLOSED LID EACH 32.01 1,25000 40,00000 29 INLETS,TYPE A,TYPE 3 FRAME AND GRATE EACH 32.01 1,000.001 32,00000 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SUGAR GROVE,ILLINOIS PAGE 1 OF 2 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE GREENBRIAR ROAD-40'B-8 FROM PAVILLION TO EXISTING GREENBRIER- 7,372 LF UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS ITEM UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 30 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER,TYPE B-6.18 FOOT 14,750,0 11,00 16225000 31 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION LSUM 1,0 6,500,00 6,500.00 32 SHORT TERM PAVEMENT MARKING FOOT 1,500.0 3.00 4,500.00 33 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 4' FOOT 29,500.0 0.25 7,375.00 34 WORK ZONE PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL SO.FT. 500,0 2.00 1,000.00 35 SIGN PANEL-TYPE 1 SO.FT. 360.0 15.00 5,400.00 36 TELESCOPING STEEL SIGN POST FOOT 900.0 10.00 9,000.00 37 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LETTERS AND SYMBOLS SQ.FT. 740.0 2.50 1,850.00 38 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 4' FOOT 29,488,0 0,40 11,795.20 39 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 6' FOOT 5,900.0 0.65 3,835.00 40 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING-LINE 24' FOOT 1,480.0 250 3,700.00 41 ELECTRIC SERVICE INSTALLATION EACH 1.0 750.00 75000 42 CONDUIT IN TRENCH,2'DIA.,PVC FOOT 900.0 5.00 4,500.00 43 TRENCH AND BACKFILL FOR ELECTRICAL WORK FOOT 8,300.0 2.00 16,600.00 44 ELECTRIC CABLE IN TRENCH,600V(XLP=TYPE USE)1/C NO.10 FOOT 8,300.0 0.75 6,225.00 45 ELECTRIC CABLE IN TRENCH,600V(XLP=TYPE USE)1/C NO.6 FOOT 16,600.0 0.75 6,225.00 46 STREETLIGHT,COMPLETE EACH 32.0 3,000.00 96,000.00 47 PARKWAY TREES EACH 300.0 400.00 120,000.00 48 MEDIAN LANDSCAPING LSUM 1.0 0.00 - TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 2,730,307.20 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING(16%) ; 436,849.16 MATERIAL TESTING(4%) ; 109,212.29 ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL ; 3,276,368.65 ESTIMATED COST PER LINEAR FOOT (rounded up to nearest dollar)1; 445.00 G:\Pubric\Yorkville\2005\YO0506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Eng1(Fox Road cost estimate.xls]cost per foot worksheet-BLVD1 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SUGAR GROVE,ILLINOIS PAGE 2 OF 2 4 7 Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Pavilion Road & Illinois 71 Date: June 28, 2005 Time: AM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles Pavilion Road Illinois 71 15 min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Begin Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ght ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Volume 7:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 69 0 69 0 34 1 35 106 7:15 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 7 3 118 0 121 0 35 2 37 165 7:30 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 1 71 0 72 0 40 1 41 119 7:45 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 4 60 0 64 0 55 4 59 130 8:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 68 0 68 0 51 0 51 123 8:15 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 1 48 0 49 0 32 2 34 87 8:30 0 - 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 56 0 56 0 40 6 46 106 8:45 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 76 0 78 0 36 5 41 121 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Hour Pavilion Road Illinois 71 Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Volume Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal 7:00 0 0 0 0 21 0 1 22 8 318 0 326 0 164 8 172 520 7:15 0 0 0 0 21 0 3 24 8 317 0 325 0 181 7 188 537 7:30 0 0 0 0 19 0 2 21 6 247 0 253 0 178 7 185 459 7:45 0 0 0 0 17 0 2 19 5 232 0 237 0 1.78 12 190 446 8:00 0 0 0 0 12 0 2 14 3 248 0 251 0 159 13 172 437 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Pavilion Road Illinois 71 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Begin Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru Ri ght ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal 7:15 0 0 0 0 21 0 3 24 8 317 0 325 0 181 7 188 537 7:15 0%, 0% 0% o% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 11% 0% 11% 0% 20% 0% 20% (%hv) 7:15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.38 0.86 0.50 0.67 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.82 0.44 0.80 0.81 G:\Pub11c\Yorkv111e\2005\YO050G Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportadon Study\Traffic Counts\Pavillon 71 AM Peak 10 Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Pavilion Road & Illinois 71 Date: June 28, 2005 Time: PM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles 15 min Pavilion Road Illinois 71 Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound g Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru 1Riqht ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Volume 16:00 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 8 4 55 0 59 0 116 8 124 191 16:15 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 5 1 47 0 48 0 86 5 91 144 16:30 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 7 4 47 0 51 0 98 5 103 161 16:45 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 9 0 54 0 54 0 114 14 128 191 17:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 39 0 39 0 113 5 118 160 17:15 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 6 2 44 0 46 0 117 9 126 178 17:30 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 6 1 47 0 48 0 100 7 107 161 17:45 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 6 4 50 0 54 0 103 3 106 166 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Hour Pavilion Road Illinois 71 Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound 9 Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Volume 16:00 0 0 0 0 16 0 13 29 9 203 0 212 0 414 32 446 687 16:15 0 0 0 0 12 0 12. 24 5 187 0 192 0 411 29 440 656 16:30 0 0 0 0 10 0 15 25 6 184 0 190 0 442 33 475 690 16:45 0 0 0 0 10 0 14 24 3 184 0 187 0 444 35 479 690 17:00 0 0 0 0 13 0 8 21 7 180 0 187 0 433 24 457 665 ° Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Pavilion Road Illinois 71 Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left IThru Right Total Left Thru 1RIght ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal 16:30 01 0 0 0 10 0 15 25 6 184. 0 190 0 442 33 475 690 16:30 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 17% 2% 0% 19% 0% 6% 0% 6% (%hv) 16:301 1.001 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.631 1.00 0.54 0.69 0.38 0.85 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.94 0.59 0.93 0.90 G:\Pub11c\Yorkv111e\2005\YO0506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Tmfflc Counts\Pavilion 71 PM Peak r Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Illinois 47&VanEmmon Street Date: June 16, 2005 Time: AM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles 15 min Illinois 47 VanEmmon Street Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Volume Left Thru 1Right ITotal Left Thru Ri ght ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal 7:00 1 185 3 189 6 128 0 134 8 0 1 9 2 2 14 18 350 7:15 0 155 6 161 13 114 5 132 8 4 0 12 2 4 10 16 321 7:30 2 192 4 198 10 130 1 141 13 0 0 13 0 0 16 16 368 7:45 1 177 3 181 10 179 3 192 11 2 2 15 6 9 13 28 416 8:00 2 189 8 199 14 156 1 171 6 2 0 8 5 2 21 28 406 8:15 4 174 7 185 7 125 2 134 14 2 1 17 0 1 15 16 352 8:30 7 167 10 184 11 151 0 162 10 3 1 14 3 1 17 21 381 8:45 2 219 10 231 11 153 1 165 5 3 2 10 6 0 25 31 437 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Hour Illinois 47 VanEmmon Street Total Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Volume 7:00 4 709 16 729 39 551 9 599 40 6 3 49 10 15 53 78 1455 7:15 5 713 21 739 47 579 10 636 38 8 2 48 13 15 60 88 1511 7:30 9 732 22 7631 41 590 7 638 44 6 3 53 11 12 65 88 1542 7:45 14 707 28 7491 421 611 6 659 41 9 4 54 14 13 66 93 1555 8:00 15 749 35 7991 431 585 4 632 35 10 4 49 14 4 78 96 1576 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Illinois 47 VanEmmon Street Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left IThru Right Total Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRight Total Left IThru Right ITotal 8:00 15 749 35 799 43 585 4 632 35 10 4 49 14 4 78 96 1576 8:00 0% 15% 3% 18% 0% 17% 0% 17% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% (%hv) 8:00 0.54 0.86 0.88 0.861 0.77 0.94 0.50 0.92 0.63 0.83 0.50 0.72 0.58 0.50 0.78 0.77 0.90 GAPub1ic\Yorkv111e\2005\Y00506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Traffic Counts\47 Vanemmon AM Peak Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Illinois 47&VanEmmon Street Date: June 16,2005 Time: PM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles 15 min Illinois 47 VanEmmon Street Total Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Volume 16:00 5 207 8 220 6 217 3 226 20 1 2 23 7 2 27 36 505 16:15 3 188 4 195 8 236 1 245 11 2 1 14 6 6 26 38 492 16:30 2 200 6 208 10 211 4 225 22 8 1 31 8 8 19 35 499 16:45 5 204 3 212 8 220 4 232 13 5 6 24 3 1 21 25 493 17:00 2 193 10 205 14 203 6 223 20 8 5 33 11 4 21 36 497 17:15 4 198 6 208 17 218 6 241 14 1 0 15 5 8 24 37 501 17:30 1 221 11 233 15 202 4 221 17 2 3 22 4 6 37 47 523 17:45 6 215 6 227 13 241 4 258 17 3 3 23 3 5 39 471 555 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Hour Illinois 47 VanEmmon Street Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Volume Left Thru IRight.lTotal Left Thru lRight. ITotal Left Thru Ri ght ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal 16:00 15 799 21 835 32 884 12 928 66 16 10 92 24 17 93 134 1989 16:15 12 785 23 820 40 870 15 925 66 23 13 102 28 19 87 134 1981 16:30 13 795 25 833 49 852 20 921 69 22 12 1031 27 21 85 133 1990 16:45 12 816 30 858 54 843 20 917 64 16 14 94 23 19 103 145 2014 17:00 13 827 33 873 59 864 20 943 68 14 11 93 23 23 121 167 2076 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Illinois 47 VanEmmon Street Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal 17:00 13 827 33 873 59 864 20 943 68 14 11 93 23 23 121 167 2076 17:00 0% 4% 0% 4% 0% 5% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 0% 4% (%hv) 17:001 0.54 0.94 0.75 0.94 0.87 0.90 0.83 0.91 0.85 0.44 0.55 0.701 0.52 0.72 0.78 0.891 0.94 G:\Public\Yorkville\2005\Y00506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\TraNlc Counts\47 Vanemmon PM Peak Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Illinois 47& Greenbriar Road Date: June 21, 2005 Time: AM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles Illinois 47 Greenbriar Road 15 min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Begin Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight Total Volume 7:00 2 102 0 104 0 82 6 88 16 0 5 21 0 0 0 0 213 7:15 3 97 0 100 0 89 2 91 21 0 5 26 0 0 0 0 217 7:30 4 122 0 126 0 94 8 102 24 0 6 30 0 0 0 0 258 7:45 10 129 0 139 ' 0 98 3 101 12 0 3 15 0 0 0 0 255 8:00 3 106 0 109 0 88 17 105 20 0 5 25 0 0 0 0 239 8:15 7 108 0 115 0 102 6 108 13 0 10 23 0 0 0 0 246 8:30 3 107 0 110 0 98 2 100 17 0 5 22 0 0 0 0 232 8:45 1 117 0 118 0 91 9 100 17 0 8 25 0 0 0 0 243 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Hour Illinois 47 Greenbriar Road Total g Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRIght ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru IRIght ITotal Volume 7:00 19 450 0 469 0 363 19 382 73 0 19 92 0 0 0 0 943 7:15 20 454 0 474 0 369 30 399 77 0 19 96 0 0 0 0 969 7:30 24 465 0 489 0 382 34 416 69 0 24 93 0 0 0 0 998 7:45 23 450 0 473 0 386 28 414 62 0 23 85 0 0 0 0 972 8:00 14 438 0 452 0 379 34 413 67 0 28 95 0 0 0 0 960 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Illinois 47 Greenbriar Road Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Begin Left Thru IRight Total Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru 1RIght Total Left IThru Right Total 7:30 24 465 0 489 0 382 34 416 69 0 24 93 0 0 0 0 998 7:30 13% 24% 0% 37% 0% 34% 12% 45% 3% 0% 0% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% (%hv) 7:301 0.60 0.90 1.00 0.881 1.00 0.94 0.50 0.96 0.72 1.00 0.60 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 GAPub11c\Yorkv111e\2005\YO0506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Trafflc Counts\47 Greenbriar AM Peak Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Illinois 47&Greenbriar Road Date: June 21,2005 Time: PM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles 15 min Illinois 47 , Greenbriar Road Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Volume Left Thru IRight.lTotal Left Thru lRight. ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal 16:00 3 112 0 115 0 133 18 151 7 0 6 13 0 0 0 0 279 16:15 6 100 0 106 0 136 21 157 7 0 3 10 0 0 0 0 273 16:30 5 86 0 91 0 130 19 149 14 0 7 21 0 0 0 0 261 16:45 4 83 0 87 0 132 17 149 11 0 4 15 0 0 0 0 251 17:00 7 110 0 117 0 137 28 165 21 0 3 24 0 0 0 0 306 17:15 5 109 0 114 0 139 30 169 10 0 3 13 0 0 0 0 296 17:30 6 93 0 99 0 117 26 143 13 0 4 17 0 0 0 0 259 17:45 4 81 0 85 0 127 15 142 14 0 11 25 0 0 0 0 252 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Hour Illinois 47 Greenbriar Road Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Volume Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight. ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru lRight Total 16:00 18 381 0 399 0 531 75 606 39 0 20 59 0 0 0 0 1064 16:15 22 379 0 401 0 535 85 620 53 0 17 70 0 0 0 0 1091 16:30 21 388 0 409 0 538 94 632 56 0 17 731 0 0 0 0 1114 16:45 22 395 0 417 0 525 101 626 55 0 14 69 0 0 0 0 1112 17:00 22 393 0 415 0 520 99 619 58 0 21 79 0 0 0 0 1113 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Illinois 47 Greenbriar Road Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Begin Left IThru Ri ht Total Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru 1RIght ITotal 16:30 211 388 0 409 0 538 1141 632 56 0 17 73 0 0 0 0 1114 16:30 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% 10% 2% 12% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% (%hv) 16:30 0.75 0.88 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.97 0.78 0.93 0.67 1.00 0.61 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 GAPub11c\Yorfwll1e\2005\YO0506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Traffic Counts\47 Greenbriar PM Peak r Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Illinois 47& Fox Road Date: June 21,2005 Time: AM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles 15 min Illinois 47 Fox Road Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Volume Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRiaht ITotal Left Thru lRight Total 7:00 3 139 1 143 1 126 12 139 37 5 12 54 0 0 2 2 338 7:15 2 151 1 154 1 148 11 160 48 5 11 64 2 1 5 8 386 7:30 8 163 2 173 0 127 8 135 30 7 15 52 2 1 3 6 366 7:45 11 162 2 175 0 151 8 159 29 3 13 45 1 3 3 7 386 8:00 10 186 0 196 0 153 12 165 33 2 7 42 0 0 0 0 403 8:15 10 153 0 163 2 140 15 157 30 6 9 45 2 2 3 7 372 8:30 7 153 0 160 2 121 19 142 34 6 10 50 1 3 4 8 360 8:45 10 151 1 162 1 137 16 154 43 3 7 53 0 4 2 6 375 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Hour Illinois 47 Fox Road Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Volume Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRIght ITotal 7:00 24 615 6 645 2 552 39 593 144 20 51 215 5 5 13 23 1476 7:15 31 662 5 698 1 579 39 619 140 17 46 203 5 5 11 21 1541 7:30 39 664 4 707 2 571 43 616 122 18 44 184 5 6 9 20 1527 7:45 38 654 2 694 4 565 54 623 126 17 39 182 4 8 10 22 1521 8:00 37 643 1 681 5 551 62 618 140 17 33 190 3 9 9 21 1510 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Illinois 47 Fox Road Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Begin Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total 7:15 31 662 5 698 1 579 39 619 140 17 46 203 5 5 11 21 1541 7:15 3% 18% 20% 41% 0% 22% 3% 24% 6% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% (%hv) 7:15 0.70 0.89 0.63 0.891 0.25 0.95 0.81 0.94 0.73 0.61 0.77 0.791 0.63 0.42 0.55 0.66 0.96 GAPubl1c\Yorkv111e\2005\YO0506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Trafftc Counts447 Fox AM Peak Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Illinois 47& Fox Road Date: June 21,2005 Time: PM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles 15 min Illinois 47 Fox Road Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Volume Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru Ri ght ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal 16:00 12 169 3 184 3 204 35 242 33 3 2 38 4 7 2 13 477 16:15 21 136 2 159 3 189 31 223 36 1 6 43 3 7 6 16 441 16:30 14 151 2 167 4 185 32 221 24 5 10 39 1 9 4 14 441 16:45 14 165 1 180 1 168 26 195 31 6 10 47 2 9 5 16 438 17:00 14 173 2 189 3 184 36 223 21 4 16 41 5 6 6 17 470 17:15 13 169 1 183 0 192 37 229 33 6 11 50 6 9 8 23 485 17:30 8 161 0 169 2 174 31 207 23 10 4 37 1 11 3 15 428 17:451 16 154 0 170 4 194 34 232 27 5 3 35 1 3 3 7 444 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Hour Illinois 47 Fox Road Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Volume Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru 18ight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal 16:00 61 621 8 690 11 746 124 881 124 15 28 167 10 32 17 59 1.797 16:15 63 625 7 695 11 726 125 862 112 16 42 170 11 31 21 63 1790 16:30 55 658 6 719 8 729 131 868 109 21 47 177 14 33 23 70 1834 16:45 49 668 4 721 6 718 130 854 108 26 41 . 175 14 35 22 71 1821 17:00 51 657 3 711 9 744 138 891 104 25 34 163 13 29 20 62 1827 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Illinois 47 Fox Road Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Begin Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total 11-eft Thru Ri ht Total 16:30 551 658 6 719 8 729 10111 868 109 21 47 177 14 33 23 70 1834 16:30 0% 6% 0% 6% 0% 8% 0°l0 8% 0% 0% 6% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% (%hV) 16:301 0.981 0.95 0.75 0.95 0.50 0.95 0.89 0.95 0.83 0.88 0.73 0.89 0.58 0.92 0.72 0.761 0.95 O:\Publlc\Yorkvllle\2005\YO0506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Trafflc Counts\47 Fox PM Peak Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Pavilion Road& Fox Road Date: June 22,2005 Time: AM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles 15 min Pavilion Road Fox Road Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru R( ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Volume 7:00 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 18 1 19 1 10 0 11 7:15 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 33 2 35 1 4 0 38 7:30 4 0 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 22 0 8 0 5 8 39 43 7:45 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 19 2 21 1 14 0 15 46 8:00 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 21 2 23 3 13 0 16 47 8:15 4 0 9 13 0 0 0 0 0 22 1 23 4 10 0 14 50 8:30 4 0 9 13 0 0 0 0 0 12 3 15 4 17 0 21 49 8:45 1 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 13 1 14 4 11 0 15 37 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Hour Pavilion Road Fox Road Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru RI ht Total Left Thru RI ht Total Left Thru R Westbound ht Total Volume 7:00 4 0 26 30 0 0 0 0 0 92 5 97 3 36 0 39 166 7:15 4 0 26 30 0 0 0 0 0 95 6 101 5 39 0 44 7:30 8 0 32 40 0 0 0 0 0 175 7:45 8 0 36 44 0 0 0 0 0 74 8 82 12 54 0 66 192 8:00 9 0 33 42 0 0 0 0 0 68 7 75 15 51 0 66 183 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Pavilion Road Fox Road Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left IThru Ri ht ITotal Left IThru lRight ITotal 11-eft IThru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total 7'45 8 0 36 44 0 0 0 0 0 74 8 82 12 54 0 66 192 7:45 0% 0% 28% 28% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 0% 4% %hV) 7:45 0.50 1.00 0.90 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.67 0.89 0.75 0.79 1.00 0.79 0.96 Q:1Pub11c\Yorkv111e\2005\Y®0506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Trafflc Counts\Pavlllon Fox AM Peak s Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Pavilion Road & Fox Road Date: June 22, 2005 Time: PM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles 15 min Pavilion Road Fox Road Total Be in Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound 9 Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru Ri ht ITotal Left Thru ,I Ri ht ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Volume 16:00 4 0 4 8 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 7 22 0 29 50 16:15 2 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 15 2 17 4 14 0 18 41 16:30 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 18 2 20 9 48 0 57 82 16:45 5 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 15 4 19 8 28 0 36 61 17:00 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 16 1 17 4 42 0 46 65 17:151 2 0 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 16 4 20 4 22 0 26 54 17:30 3 0 5 8 0 0 0 0 0 13 2 15 7 24 0 31 54 17:45 4 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 17 2 19 9 23 0 32 56 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Hour Pavilion Road Fox Road Total Be in Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound 9 Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru 1191ght ITotal Left Thru IRIaht ITotal Volume 16:00 16 0 9 25 0 0 0 0 0 61 8 69 28 112 0 140 234 16:15 13 0 6 19 0 0 0 0 0 64 9 73 25 132 0 . 157 249 16:30 13 0 8 21 0 0 0 0 0 65 11 76 25 140 0 165 262 16:45 11 0 13 24 0 0 0 0 0 60 11 71 23 116 0 139 234 17:00 101 0 13 23 0 0 0 0 0 62 9 71 24 111 0 135 229 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Pavilion Road Fox Road Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru JRiqht ITotal Left Thru Right ITotal Left Thru Ri ht Total 16:30 13 0 8 21 0 0 0 0 0 65 11 76 25 140 0 165 262 16:30 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 0% 3% 0% 1% 0% 1% (%hV) 16:30 0.65 1.00 0.33 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.69 0.95 0.69 0.73 1.00 0.72 0.80 G:\Pub11c\Yorkvi11e\2005\Y0050t3 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Tm flc Counts\Pavilion Fox PM Peak t Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Illinois 47& Illinois 71 Date: June 15, 2005 Time: AM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles 15 min Illinois 47 Westbound Illinois 71 Total Begin Northbound Southbound Eastbound Volume Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru Ri ght ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal 7:00 3 65 21 89 10 54 27 91 21 46 4 71 19 30 9 58 309 7:15 0 61 24 85 11 70 18 99 35 104 3 14,,'2 24 33 4 61 387 7:30 2 64 22 88 8 55 30 93 29 68 0 97 18 22 10 50 328 7:45 4 72 14 90 9 49 25 83 48 66 6 120 26 38 16 80 373 8:00 2 70 17 89 16 69 13 98 31 64 1 96 27 32 10 69 352 8:15 2 77 23 102 6 51 22 79 27 59 0 86 15 35 15 65 332 8:30 6 61 15 82 16 66 24 106 24 51 4 79 17 27 17 61 328 8:45 3 53 17 73 91 67 20 96 31 50 2 83 27 21 141 621 314 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Illinois 47 Illinois 71 Total Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Volume 7:00 9 262 81 352 38 228 100 366 133 284 13 430 87 123 39 249 1397 7:15 8 267 77 352 44 243 86 373 143 302 10 455 95 125 40 260 1440 7:30 10 283 76 3691 39 224 90 353 135 257 7 399 86 127 51 264 1385 7:45 14 280 69 363 47 235 84 366 130 240 11 381 85 132 58 275 1385 8:00 13 261 72 346 47 253 79 379 113 224 7 344 86 115 56 257 1326 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Illinois 47 Illinois 71 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Begin Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total 7:15 8 267 77 352 44 243 86 373 143 302 10 45.5 95 125 40 260 1440 7:15 13% 31% 19% 63016 18% 33% 31016 83016 16% 8% 10% 34% 28% 12% 0% 40% (%hv) 7:15 0.50 0.93 0.80 0.981 0.69 0.87 .0.72 0.94 0.74 0.73 0.42 0.801 0.88 0.82 0.63 0.81 0.93 G:\Pub1ic\Yorkv111e\2005\YO0506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Trafflc Counts\47 71 AM Peak Project: YO 0506 Intersection: Illinois 47& Illinois 71 Date: June 15, 2005 Time: PM Peak Hour 15-Minute Summary of All Vehicles Illinois 47 Illinois 71 Total 15 min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRight ITotal Left Thru lRight ITotal Left Thru IRight Total Volume 16:00 4 62 22 88 17 82 44 143 29 54 1 84 32 96 15 143 458 16:15 8 60 16 84 18 73 48 139 30 40 3 73 33 73 21 127 423. 16:30 6 63 16 85 10 58 34 102 26 30 7 63 29 101 21 151 401 16:45 3 72 16 91 24 74 40 138 30 36 4 70 28 88 19 135 434 17:00 4 64 23 91 14 65 44 123 24 51 1 76 16 94 13 123 413 17:15 5 56 24 85 18 61 41 120 23 40 4 67 19 79 14 112 384 17:30 5 54 20 79 17 73 53 143 24 42 6 72 24 84 15 123 417 17:45 6 43 20 69 16 72 45 133 . 25 33 2 601 31 99 11 141 403 Hourly Summary of All Vehicles Illinois 47 Illinois 71 Total Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Begin Left Thru IRight.lTotal Left Thru lRight, ITotal I Left Thru Ri ght ITotal Left Thru IRight Total Volume 16:00 21 257 70 348 69 287 166 522 115 160 15 290 122 358 76 556 1716 16:15 21 259 71 351 66 270 166 502 110 157 15 282 106 356 74 536 1671 16:30 18 255 79 352 66 258 159 483 103 157 1.6 276 92 362 67 521 1632 16:45 17 246 83 346 73 273 178 524 101 169 15 2851 87 345 61 493 1648 17:00 20 217 87 324 65 271 183 519 96 166 13 2751 90 356 53 499 1617 Peak Hour Summary Peak Hour Illinois 47 Illinois 71 Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Begin Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Ri ht Total Left Thru Right Total 16:00 21 257 70 348 69 287 166 522 115 160 15 290 122 358 76 556 1716 16:00 33% 19% 17% 70% 1% 14% 13% 28% 11% 9% 20% 40% 9% 5% 3% 17% (%hV) 16:00 0.66 0.89 0.80 0.96 0.72 0.88 0.861 0.911 0.96 0.74 0.54 0.86 0.92 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 G*.\Public\Yorkville\2005\YO0506 Fox Road-Southwest Area Transportation Study\Traffic Counts\47 71 PM Peak Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 ration : Route 71 Site: Y00506 .ross St : West of 47 Date: 05/16/05 IPH D rectionEB2 Jerval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week legin 5/16 5/17 5/18 5/19 5/20 5/21 5/22 Avg Avg 12:AM * * * 22 20 * * 21 21 1:00 * * * 20 19 * * 19 19 2:00 * * * 20 29 * * 24 24 3:00 * * * 45 40 * * 42 42 4:00 * * * 167 152 * * 159 159 5:00 * * * 442 483 * * 462 462 6:00 * * * 641 615 * * 628 628 7:00 * * * 476 457 * * 466 466 8:00 * * * 376 375 * * 375 375 9:00 * * * 294 * * * 294 294 10:00 * * * 275 * * * 275 275 11:00 * * * 264 * * * 264 264 12:PM * * * 247 * * * 247 247 1:00 * * * 219 * * * 219 219 2:00 * * * 261 * * * 261 261 3:00 * * 119 275 * * * 197 197 4:00 * * 319 261 * * * 290 290 5:00 * * 287 244 * * * 265 265 6:00 * * 224 240 * * * 232 232 7:00 * * 175 114 * * * 144 144 8:00 * * 115 96 * * * 105 105 9:00 * * 106 90 * * * 98 98 10:00 * * 79 80 * * * 79 79 11:00 * * 34 36 * * * 35 35 )tats 0 0 1,458 5,205 2,190 0 0 5,201 5,201 N1 Peak * * * 6:00 6:00 * * 6:00 6:00 plume * * * 641 615 * * 628 628 'M Peak * * 4:00 3:00 * * * 4:00 4:00 plume * * 319 275 * * * 290 290 Envineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 ocation : Route 71 Site: Y00506 'Toss St : West of 47 Date: 05/16/05 MPH DirectionWB2 Iterval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week Begin 5/16 5/17 5/18 5/19 5/20 5/21 5/22 Avg Avg 12:AM * * * 41 49 * * 45 45 1:00 * * * 35 32 * * 33 33 2:00 * * * 21 26 * * 23 23 3:00 * * * 32 20 * * 26 26 4:00 * * * 32 26 * * 29 29 5:00 * * * 73 71 * * 72 72 6:00 * * * 122 159 * * 140 140 7:00 * * * 224 223 * * 223 223 8:00 * * * 212 249 * * 230 230 9:00 * * * 171 * * * 171 171 10:00 * * * 201 * * * 201 201 11:00 * * * 227 * * * 227 227 12:PM * * * 218 * * * 218 218 1:00 * * * 236 * * * 236 236 2:00 * * * 291 * * * 291 291 3:00 * * 336 549 * * * 442 442 4:00 * * 603 566 * * * 584 584 5:00 * * 526 532 * * * 529 529 6:00 * * 365 346 * * * 355 355 7:00 * * 236 235 * * * 235 235 8:00 * * 218 168 * * * 193 193 9:00 * * 174 184 * * * 179 179 10:00 * * 105 118 * * * 111 111 11:00 * * 93 85 * * * 89 89 Dtals 0 0 2,656 4,919 855 0 0 4,882 4,882 °M Peak * * * 11:00 8:00 * * 8:00 8:00 olume * * * 227 249 * * 230 230 PM Peak * * 4:00 4:00 * * * 4:00 4:00 olume * * 603 566 * * * 584 584 DabF1lec RnMr71 WrctnfRnntnd7 Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 cation : Fox Road Site: YO0506 ross St : East of White Oak Date: 06/13/05 IPH terval Mon 13 Tue 14 Wed 15 Thu 16 Fri 17 Sat 18 Sun 19 Weekday Avg. •egiII WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED 12:AM s * * * * s 15 5 22 3 * * + + 18 4 01:00 * * s * * * 13 1 7 5 s + * * 10 3 02:00 * * + * » * 2 4 8 5 » » + * 5 4 03:00 s * s • + s 2 4 2 4 * • * * 2 4 04:00 * + ' * * s 3 23 4 22 * * * * 3 22 05:00 * * * * * * 7 86 7 69 » * • • 7 77 06:00 * * * s * * 41 175 38 147 * * * * 39 161 07:00 * * * * * * 83 191 72 186 * * * * 77 188 08:00 * * * * * * 82 189 76 162 * * * * 79 175 09:00 * * * * * * 101 145 78 130 * * * * 89 137 10:00 * * * * * * 107 131 * * * * * * 107 131 11:00 * * * * 13 6 130 133 * * * * * * 71 69 12:PM * * * * 133 134 139 127 * * * * * * 136 130 01:00 * * * * 124 118 144 117 * * * * * * 134 117 02:00 * * * * 136 98 123 130 » * * * * * 129 114 03:00 * * * * 177 117 189 124 * * * * * * 183 120 04:00 * * * * 225 128 256 141 * * * * * * 240 134 05:00 * * * * 191 131 223 159 * * * * * * 207 145 06:00 * * * * 166 109 153 124 * * * * * * 159 116 07:00 * * * * 154 88 133 81 * * * * * * 143 84 08:00 * * * * 128 64 138 74 * * * * * * 133 69 09:00 * * * * 79 31 92 45 * * * * * * 85 38 10:00 * * * * 50 23 54 30 * * * * * * 52 26 11:00 * * * * 28 12 24 17 * * * * * + 26 14 otals 0 0 0 0 1,604 1,059 2,254 2,256 314 733 0 0 0 0 2,134 2,082 -mbined 0 0 2,663 4,510 1,047 0 0 4216 put% 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 601 39.8 50.0 50.0 30.0 70.0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 50.6 49.4 4 ak Hr * * * * 11:00 11:00 11:00 07:00 09:00 07:00 * * * * 10.00 07:00 `olume * * * * 13 6 130 191 78 186 * * * * 107 188 1 .®kHr * * * * 04:00 12:00 04:00 05:00 + * * * * * 04:00 05:00 olume * * » * 225 134 256 159 * * * * » * 240 145 fk�taFil�• FnYAn�nFAernnurcrrrcn.11fAEl nnnsnns.s-...... Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 ocation : FOX RD Site: Y00506 .;roes St : EAST OF HIGHPOINT Date: 06/13/05 MPH heal Mon 13 Tue 14 Wed 15 Thu 16 Fri 17 Sat 18 Sun 19 Weekday Avg. negin WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB EB 12:AM * * 6 3 12 6 * * * * + * + * 9 4 01:00 • • 2 3 5 7 • * * * * + + * 3. 5 02:00 * * 1 2 0 2 * * * * * + * * 0 2 03:00 * * 0 1 0 4 * * * * + * * * 0 2 04:00 • * 2 6 4 10 * * * * • + * * 3 9 05.00 * * 6 35 4 31 * * * * * + + * 5 33 06:00 • * 16 57 26 57 * * * * * * * * 21 57 07:00 * * 41 87 34 74 * * * s * * * * 37 80 08:00 * * 43 50 47 46 * * * * * * * * 45 48 09:00 38 53 41 45 * * * * * * * * * * 39 49 10:00 59 72 46 53 * * * * * * * * * * 52 62 11.00 57 56 51 59 * * * * * * * * * * 54 57 12:PM 56 96 54 65 * * * * * * * * * s 55 80 01:00 61 52 64 46 * s * * * s * s * * 62 49 02:00 66 64 69 50 * * * * * * * * * * 67 57 03:00 90 76 98 77 * * * * s * * * * * 94 76 04.00 157 60 116 54 s * * * * * s * * * 136 57 05:00 82 59 104 64 s * * * * * * s * * 93 61 06.00 57 59 68 54 * * * * * * * * * * 62 56 07:00 52 43 37 52 * * * * * * * * * * 44 47 08:00 38 32 45 37 * * * * * * * s * s 41 34 09:00 37 32 26 31 * * * * * * * s * * 31 31 10:00 16 11 9 21 * * * * * * * * * * 12 16 11:00 11 8 13 8 * * * * * * * * * * 12 8 Totals 877 773 958 960 132 237 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 977 979 umbiled 1,650 1,918 369 0 0 0 0 1,956 Split% 53.2 46.8 49.9 50.1 35.8 642 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 49.9 50.1 M _.!ak Hr 10:00 10:00 11:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 s * * • + * * * 11:00 07.00 Volume 59 72 51 87 47 74 s * * * * * * * 54 80 K reakHr 04:00 12:00 04:00 03:00 * * * s * * * * * * 04:00 12.00 Volume 157 96 116 77 * * * s * * * * s * 136 80 Endneering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 xation : ROUTE 47' Site: YO0506 .Toss St : BETWEEN VANEMMON AND FOX S' Date: 06/13/05 IPH DirectiorSB2 Aerval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week -egin 6/13 6/14 6/15 6/16 6/17 6/18 6/19 Avg Avg 12:AM * 97 88 * * * * 92 92 1:00 * 50 45 * * * * 47 47 2:00 * 33 35 * * * * 34 34 3:00 * 35 42 * * * * 38 38 4:00 * 122 111 * * * * 116 116 5:00 * 282 308 * * * * 295 295 6:00 * 481 516 * * * * 498 498 7:00 * 566 585 * * * * 575 575 8:00 * 562 608 * * * * 585 585 9:00 * 583 * * * * * 583 583 10:00 573 617 * * * * * 595 595 11:00 577 586 * * * * * 581 581 12:PM 636 638 * * * * * 637 637 1:00 555 615 * * * * * 585 585 2:00 674 613 * * * * * 643 643 3:00 720 792 * * * * * 756 756 4:00 762 831 * * * * * 796 796 5:00 775 784 * * * * * 779 779 6:00 690 581 * * * * * 635 635 7:00 503 518 * * * * * 510 510 8:00 490 472 * * * * * 481 481 9:00 317 351 * * * * * 334 334 10:00 178 205 * * * * * 191 191 11:00 120 126 * * * * * 123 123 )tals 7,570 10,540 2,338 0 0 0 0 10,509 10,509 M Peak 11:00 10:00 8:00 * * * * 10:00 10:00 plume 577 617 608 * * * * 595 595 'M Peak 5:00 4:00 * * * * * 4:00 4:00 DIume 775 831 * * * * * 796 796 Engineering Enterprises,he. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 ,ocation : Route 47 Site: Y00506 _:rocs St :Between VanEmmon and Fox St NB Date: 06/13/05 MPH DirectionNB2 rterval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week Begin 6/13 6/14 6/15 6/16 6/17 6/18 6/19 Avg Avg 12'AM * 74 64 * * * * 69 69 1:00 * 33 36 * * * * 34 34 2:00 * 30 44 * * * * 37 37 3:00 * 45 45 * * * * 45 45 4:00 * 127 107 * * * * 117 117 5:00 * 477 469 * * * * 473 473 6:00 * 797 776 * * * * 786 786 7:00 * 689 690 * * * * 689 689 8:00 * 656 690 * * * * 673 673 9:00 * 617 * * * * * 617 617 10:00 484 650 * * * * * 567 567 11:00 637 612 * * * * * 624 624 12:PM 615 634 * * * * * 624 624 1:00 531 606 * * * * * 568 568 2:00 615 616 * * * * * 615 615 3:00 651 688 * * * * * 669 669 4:00 641 659 * * * * * 650 650 5:00 714 711 * * * * * 712 712 6:00 562 514 * * * * * 538 538 7:00 441 431 * * * * * 436 436 8:00 391 335 * * * # * 363 363 9:00 263 275 * * * * * 269 269 10:00 157 195 * * * * * 176 176 11:00 101 102 * * * * * 101 101 otals 6,803 10,573 2,921 0 0 0 0 10,452 10,452 AM Peak 11:00 6:00 6:00 * * * * 6:00 6:00 olume 637 797 776 * * * * 786 786 PM Peak 5:00 5:00 * * * * * 5:00 5:00 olume 714 711 * * * * * 712 712 TYato Te"4• TT T MATO A7 Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 ,ocation :North of Route 71 Site: Route 47 .'ross St Date: 05/16/05 v1PH DirectionNB2 .aterval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week 3egin 5/16 5/17 5/18 5/19 5/20 5/21 5/22 Avg Avg 12:AM * * * * * 74 91 * 82 1:00 * * * * * 31 50 * 40 2:00 * * * * * 15 31 * 23 3:00 * * * * * 20 16 * 18 4:00 * * * * * 48 12 * 30 5:00 * * * * * 95 42 * 68 6:00 * * * * * 221 75 * 148 7:00 * * * * * 309 131 * 220 8:00 * * * * * 356 177 * 266 9:00 * * * * 232 452 316 232 333 10:00 * * * * 419 415 417 419 417 11:00 * * * * 424 428 342 424 398 12-PM * * * * 403 386 401 403 396 1:00 * * * * 389 373 378 389 380 2:00 * * * * 443 384 344 443 390 3:00 * * * * 540 398 339 540 425 4:00 * * * * 513 394 388 513 431 5:00 * * * * 465 330 349 465 381 6:00 * * * * 329 359 354 329 347 7:00 * * * * 292 252 307 292 283 8:00 * * * * 276 204 221 276 233 9:00 * * * * 181 212 173 181 188 10:00 * * * * 149 165 118 149 144 11:00 * * * * 102 140 42 102 94 otals 0 0 0 0 5,157 6,061 5,114 5,157 5,735 'M Peak * * * * 11:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 10:00 olume * * * * 424 452 417 424 417 °M Peak * * * * 3:00 3:00 12:00 3:00 4:00 olume * * * * 540 398 401 540 431 Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 cation :North of Route 71 Site: Route 47 L'ross St Date: 05/23/05 MPH DirectionNB2 interval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Weds Begin 5/23 5/24 5/25 5/26 5/27 5/28 5/29 Avg Avg 12:AM 28 24 * * * * * 26 26 1:00 17 19 * * * * * 18 18 2:00 17 17 * * * * * 17 17 3:00 27 17 * * * * * 22 22 4:00 81 75 * * * * * 78 78 5:00 283 305 * * * * * 294 294 6:00 534 519 * * * * * 526 526 7:00 503 507 * * * * * 505 505 8:00 520 487 * * * * * 503 503 9:00 407 375 * * * * * 391 391 10:00 360 0 * * * * * 180 180 11:00 375 * * * * * * 375 375 12:PM 422 * * * * * * 422 422 1:00 390 * * * * * * 390 390 2:00 403 * * * * * * 403 403 3:00 492 * * * * * * 492 492 4:00 415 * * * * * * 415 .415 5:00 362 * * * * * * 362 362 6:00 263 * * * * * * 263 263 7:00 253 * * * * * * 253 253 8:00 213 * * * * * * 213 213 9:00 110 * * * * * * 110 110 10:00 78 * * * * * * 78 78 11:00 44 * * * * * * 44 44 )talc 6,597 2,345 0 0 0 0 0 6,380 6,380 M Peak 6:00 6:00 * * * * * 6:00 6:00 plume 534 519 * * * * * 526 526 -Nf Peak 3:00 * * * * * * 3:00 3:00 olume 492 * * * * * * 492 492 Enzineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 cation : Route 47 Site: Y00506 .toss St :North of 71 (SB) Date: 05/16/05 d[PH DuectiorSB2 Aerval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week legin 5/16 5/17 5/18 5/19 5/20 5/21 5/22 Avg Avg 12:AM * * * * * 76 66 * 71 1:00 * * * * * 45 42 * 43 2:00 * * * * * 27 21 * 24 3:00 * * * * * 29 10 * 19 4:00 * * * * * 34 19 * 26 5:00 * * * * * 102 42 * 72 6:00 * * * * * 171 82 * 126 7:00 * * * * * 309 181 * 245 8:00 * * * * * 436 242 * 339 9:00 * * * * 80 472 410 80 320 10:00 * * * * 438 442 354 438 411 11:00 * * * * 448 508 364 448 440 12:PM * * * * 506 492 389 506 462 1:00 * * * * 473 508 392 473 457 2:00 * * * * 523 432 361 523 438 3:00 * * * * 588 425 363 588 458 4:00 * * * * 619 472 374 619 488 5:00 * * * * 600 349 326 600 425 6:00 * * * * 521 313 289 521 374 7:00 * * * * 373 267 245 373 295 8:00 * * * * 271 220 190 271 227 9:00 * * * * 210 174 143 210 175 10:00 * * * * 134 140 76 134 116 11:00 * * * * 102 101 39 102 80 )talc 0 0 0 0 5,886 6,544 5,020 5,886 6,131 M Peak * * * * 11:00 11:00 9:00 11:00 .11:00 olume * * * * 448 508 410 448 440 'M Peak * * * * 4:00 1:00 1:00 4:00 4:00 olume * * * * 619 508 392 619 488 Engineerinx Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 ovation : Route 47 Site: Y00506 —rose St :North of 71 (SB) Date: 05/23/05 MPH DirectionSB2 _.iterval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week Begin 5/23 5/24 5/25 5/26 5/27 5/28 5/29 Avg Avg 12:AM 23 38 * * * * * 30 30 1:00 17 27 * * * * * 22 22 2:00 16 19 * * * * * 17 17 3:00 23 20 * * * * * 21 21 4:00 54 56 * * * * * 55 55 5:00 138 161 * * * * * 149 149 6:00 297 52 * * * * * 174 174 7:00 376 0 * * * * * 188 188 8:00 438 0 * * * * * 219 219 9:00 373 0 * * * * * 186 186 10:00 427 0 * * * * * 213 213 11:00 418 0 * * * * * 209 209 12:PM 452 * * * * * * 452 452 1:00 456 * * * * * * 456 456 2:00 491 * * * * * * 491 491 3:00 602 * * * * * * 602 602 4:00 559 * * * * * * 559 559 5:00 534 * * * * * * 534 534 6:00 400 * * * * * * 400 400 7:00 299 * * * * * * 299 299 8:00 207 * * * * * * 207 207 9:00 130 * * * * * * 130 130 10:00 96 * * * * * * 96 96 11:00 46 * * * * * * 46 46 )tals 6,872 373 0 0 0 0 0 5,755 5,755 ". Peak 8:00 5:00 * * * * * 8:00 8:00 plume 438 161 * * * * * 219 219 DM Peak 3:00 * * * * * * 3:00 3:00 plume 602 * * * * * * 602 602 Mfe ra. D.»....A7%.I--L_cm /anN Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 cation : FOX RD Site: Y00506 .toss St : EAST OF HIGHPOINT Date: 06/13/05 1PH terval Mon 13 Tue 14 Wed 15 Thu 16 Fri 17 Sat 18 Sun 19 Weekday Avg. Pepin WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED WB ED 12:AM w * 6 3 12 6 w * * * * * * * 9 4 01:00 * * 2 3 5 7 * * w * * s s s 3 5 02:00 * * l 2 0 2 * + * * * * * * 0 2 03:00 + * 0 1 0 4 * * * * * * s s 0 2 04:00 * * 2 6 4 10 * * * ' * * ' * 3 8 05:00 * * 6 35 4 31 * ' * * * * * * 5 33 06:00 * * 16 57 26 57 * * * * * ' * * 21 57 07:00 * * 41 87 34 74 * s * * * * * « 37 80 08:00 « ' 43 50 47 46 * * + s * * * * 45 48 09:00 38 53 41 45 s * * * * * * * s * 39 49 10:00 59 72 46 53 * * * * * * * * * * 52 62 11:00 57 56 51 59 * * * * ' * * * * * 54 57 I2:PM 56 96 54 65 + * * * + *. * * + * 55 80 01:00 61 52 64 46 * * * s * * * s * * 62 49 02:00 66 64 69 50 * * * * * * * * ' 67 57 03:00 90 76 98 77 * * * * * * * s s + 94 76 04:00 157 60 116 54 * * * * * * s * * « 136 57 05:00 82 59 104 64 * * * * * * * * * * 93 61 06:00 57 59 68 54 * * * + * * * * * * 62 56 07:00 52 43 37 52 s * * * s * s * s * 44 47 08:00 38 32 45 37 s ' * + * * * * * « 41 34 09:00 37 32 26 31 * * * * * * * ' * * 31 31 10.00 16 11 9 21 + * * s * + * * * + 12 16 11:00 11 8 13 8 s * * * * * * * s * 12 8 'otals 877 773 958 960 132 237 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 977 '979 imbined 1,650 1,918 369 0 0 0 0 1,956 split% 53.2 46.8 49.9 50.1 35.8 64.2 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 _0 49.9 50.1 K ak Hr 10:00 10:00 11:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 * * * * * * * * 11.00 07.00 /olume 59 72 51 87 47 74 * * * « * * * * 54 80 4 ,eakHr 04:00 12:00 04:00 03:00 s s s s s + * s s s 04:00 12:00 /olume 157 96 116 77 * * * * * + * + * * 136 80 r'kwaF:1.• L"VDAAnV AearnCvTnUDnT M/AZ-M-DDnATlnnr►rcr%% Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 ocation : Fox Road Site: YO0506 'rose St : East of White Oak Date: 06/13/05 MPH terval Mon 13 Tue 14 Wed 15 Thu 16 Fri 17 Sat 18 Sun 19 Weekday Avg. negin WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB 12:AM * * • r * * 15 5 22 3 * * * * 18 4 01:00 • * * * • • 13 1 7 5 * • r r 10 3 02:00 » » s » » » 2 4 8 5 » » » » 5 4 03:00 * » • » s » 2 4 2 4 » » » » 2 4 04:00 s » s » s » 3 23 4 22 » s » » 3 22 05:00 * * * * • • 7 86 7 69 * * * • 7 77 06:00 * * * * * * 41 175 38 147 * * * * 39 161 07.00 * * * * * * 83 191 22.. 186 • * * * 77 188 O8A6 * * * * * • 82 189 76 162 * * * * 79 17S 09:00 * * * * * * 101 145 78 130 * * * * 89 137 10:00 * * * * * * 107 131 * * * * * * 107 131 11:00 • * * * 13 6 130 133 * * * * * * 71 69 12:PM * * * * 133 134 139 127 * * * * * • 136 130 01:00 * * * * 124 118 144 117 * * * * * * 134 117 02.00 * * * * 136 98 123 130 * * * * * • 129 114 03:00 * * * * 177 117 189 124 * * * "* * * 183 120 04:00 ` * * * 225 128 256 141 * * * * • • 240 134 05:00 * * * * 191 131 223 159 * * * * * * 207 145 06:00 * * ' * 166 109 153 124 * * * * * * 159 116 07:00 * * * * 154 88 133 81 * * * * * * 143 84 08:00 * * * * 128 64 138 74 * * * * * * 133 69 09.00 * * * * 79 31 92 45 * * * * * * 85 38 10:00 * * * * 50 23 54 30 * * * * * * 52 26 11.00 * * * * 28 12 24 17 * * * * * * 26 14 Totals 0 0 0 0 1,604 1,059 2,254 2,256 314 733 0 0 0 0 2,134 2,082 imbined 0 0 2,663 4,510 1,047 0 0 4,216 Split% 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 60.2 39.8 50.0 50.0 30.0 70.0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 50.6 49.4 4 ak Hr * * * * 11:00 11:00 11:00 07:00 09:00 07:00 * * * * 10:00 07:00 Volume * * * * 13 6 130 191 78 186 * * * * 107 188 4 reakHr s s » * 04:00 12:00 04:00 05:00 s s s » s » 04:00 05.00 Volume * * * * 225 134 256 159 * * * * * * 240 145 TeM C:1.. pnv nn�r�r.acr nr.nnt...r-n,..•..+,......�.........-........ _ "'_""' Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 ►cation : ROLTrE 47 Site: Y00506 ,nss St : BETWEEN VANEMMON AND FOX S: Date: 06/13/05 [PH DirectiotSB2 .serval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week egin 6/13 6/14 6/15 6/16 6/17 6/18 6/19 Avg Avg 12:AM * 97 88 * * * * 92 92 1:00 * 50 45 * * * * 47 47 2:00 * 33 35 * * * * 34 34 3:00 * 35 42 * * * * 38 38 4:00 * 122 111 * * * * 116 116 5:00 * 282 308 * * * * 295 295 6:00 * 481 516 * * * * 498 498 7:00 * 566 585 * * * * 575 575 8:00 * 562 608 * * * * 585 585 9:00 * 583 * * * * * 583 583 10:00 573 617 * * * * * 595 595 11:00 577 586 * * * * * 581 581 12TM 636 638 * * * * * 637 637 1:00 555 615 * * * * * 585 585 2:00 674 613 * * * * * 643 643 3:00 720 792 * * * * * 756 756 4:00 762 831 * * * * * 796 796 5:00 775 784 * * * * * 779 779 6:00 690 581 * * * * * 635 635 7:00 503 518 * * * * * 510 510 8:00 490 472 * * * * * 481 481 9:00 317 351 * * * * * 334 334 10:00 178 205 * * * * * 191 191 11:00 120 126 * * * * * 123 123 )tals 7;570 10,540 2,338 0 0 0 0 10,509 10,509 M Peak 11:00 10:00 8:00 * * * * 10:00 10:00 plume 577 617 608 * * * * 595 595 `4 Peak 5:00 4:00 * * * * * 4:00 4:00 plume 775 831 * * * * * 796 796 Md.Ail.• U i PJAIC Al WnDTU nil TnV CT CII .._._._,. . .... .. Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 ocation : Route 47 Site: Y00506 gross St : Between VanEmmon and Fox St NB Date: 06/13/05 MPH DirectionNB2 interval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Wads Regin 6/13 6/14 6/15 6/16 6/17 6/18 6/19 Avg Avg 12:AM * 74 64 * * * * 69 69 1:00 * 33 36 * * * * 34 34 2:00 * 30 44 * * * * 37 37 3:00 * 45 45 * * * * 45 45 4:00 * 127 107 * * * * 117 117 5:00 * 477 469 * * * * 473 473 6:00 * 797 776 * * * * 786 786 7:00 * 689 690 * * * * 689 689 8:00 * 656 690 * * * * 673 673 9:00 * 617 * * * * * 617 617 10:00 484 650 * * * * * 567 567 11:00 637 612 * * * * * 624 624 12:PM 615 634 * * * * * 624 624 1:00 531 606 * * * * * 568 568 2:00 615 616 * * * * * 615 615 3:00 651 688 * * * * * 669 669 4:00 641 659 * * * * * 650 650 5:00 714 711 * * * * * 712 712 6:00 562 514 * * * * * 538 538 7:00 441 431 * * * * * 436 436 8:00 391 335 * * * * * 363 363 9:00 263 275 * * * * * 269 269 10:00 157 195 * * * * * 176 176 11:00 101 102 * * * * * 101 101 otals 6,803 10,573 2,921 0 0 0 0 10,452 10,452 M Peak 11:00 6:00 6:00 * * * * 6:00 6:00 olume 637 797 776 * * * * 786 786 -M Peak 5:00 5:00 * * * * * 5:00 5:00 olume 714 711 * * * * * 712 712 Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 nation : Route 47 Site: Y00506 _oss St : North of 71 (SB) Date: 05/16/05 IPH DirectiorSB2 .,serval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week egin 5/16 5/17 5/18 5/19 5/20 5/21 5/22 Avg Avg 12:AM * * * * * 76 66 * 71 1:00 * * * * * 45 42 * 43 2:00 * * * * * 27 21 * 24 3:00 * * * * * 29 10 * 19 4:00 * * * * * 34 19 * 26 5:00 * * * * * 102 42 * 72 6:00 * * * * * 171 82 * 126 7:00 * * * * * 309 181 * 245 8:00 * * * * * 436 242 * 339 9:00 * * * * 80 472 410 80 320 10:00 * * * * 438 442 354 438 411 11:00 * * * * 448 508 364 448 440 12:PM * * * * 506 492 389 506 462 1:00 * * * * 473 508 392 473 457 2:00 * * * * 523 432 361 523 438 3:00 * * * * 588 425 363 588 458 4:00 * * * * 619 472 374 619 488 5:00 * * * * 600 349 326 600 425 6:00 * * * * 521 313 289 521 374 7:00 * * * * 373 267 245 373 295 8:00 * * * * 271 220 190 271 227 9:00 * * * * 210 174 143 210 175 10:00 * * * * 134 140 76 134 116 11:00 * * * * 102 101 39 102 80 )tals 0 0 0 0 5,886 6,544 5,020 5,886 6,131 'v1 Peak * * * * 11:00 11:00 9:00 11:00 11:00 plume * * * * 448 508 410 448 440 ,M Peak * * * * 4:00 1:00 1:00 4:00 4:00 plume * * * * 619 508 392 619 488 T-e-=1-. o--_Al! T--L_rm-O N Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 cation : Route 47 Site: Y00506 _loss St :North of 71 (SB) Date: 05/23/05 MPH DirectiorSB2 ___terval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week Begin 5/23 5/24 5/25 5/26 5/27 5/28 5/29 Avg Avg 12:AM 23 38 * * * * * 30 30 1:00 17 27 * * * * * 22 22 2:00 16 19 * * * * * 17 17 3:00 23 20 * * * * * 21 21 4:00 54 56 * * * * * 55 55 5:00 138 161 * * * * * 149 149 6:00 297 52 * * * * * 174 174 7:00 376 0 * * * * * 188 188 8:00 438 0 * * * * * 219 219 9:00 373 0 * * * * * 186 186 10:00 427 0 * * * * * 213 213 11:00 418 * * * * * * 418 418 12:PM 452 * * * * * * 452 452 1:00 456 * * * * * * 456 456 2:00 491 * * * * * * 491 491 3:00 602 * * * * * * 602 602 4:00 559 * * * * * * 559 559 5:00 534 * * * * * * 534 534 6:00 400 * * * * * * 400 400 7:00 299 * * * * * * 299 299 8:00 207 * * * * * * 207 207 9:00 130 * * * * * * 130 130 10:00 96 * * * * * * 96 96 11:00 46 * * * * * * 46 46 )tals 6,872 373 0 0 0 0 0 5,964 5,964 AM Peak 8:00 5:00 * * * * * 11:00 11:00 Aume 438 161 * * * * * 418 418 PM Peak 3:00 * * * * * * 3:00 3:00 plume 602 * * * * * * 602 602 Data F'le• RNI�r d7 N'vfh nF11/CRl .__,_�. �»,»„„� e Engineerinz Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 'ocation : North of Route 71 Site: Route 47 !ross St Date: 05/16/05 APH DirectionNB2 iterval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week 3egin 5/16 5/17 5/18 5/19 5/20 5/21 5/22 Avg Avg 12:AM * * * * * 74 91 * 82 1:00 * * * * * 31 50 * 40 2:00 * * * * * 15 31 * 23 3:00 * * * * * 20 16 * 18 4:00 * * * * * 48 12 * 30 5:00 * * * * * 95 42 * 68 6:00 * * * * * 221 75 * 148 7:00 * * * * * 309 131 * 220 8:00 * * * * * 356 177 * 266 9:00 * * * * 232 452 316 232 333 10:00 * * * * 419 415 417 419 417 11:00 * * * * 424 428 342 424 398 12:PM * * * * 403 386 401 403 396 1:00 * * * * 389 373 378 389 380 2:00 * * * * 443 384 344 443 390 3:00 * * * * 540 398 339 540 425 4:00 * * * * 513 394 388 513 431 5:00 * * * * 465 330 349 465 381 6:00 * * * * 329 359 354 329 347 7:00 * * * * 292 252 307 292 283 8:00 * * * * 276 204 221 276 233 9:00 * * * * 181 212 173 181 188 10:00 * * * * 149 165 118 149 144 11:00 * * * * 102 140 42 102 94 otals 0 0 0 0 5,157 6,061 5,114 5,157 5,735 `,M Peak * 11:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 10:00 olume * * * * 424 452 417 424 417 'M Peak * * * * 3:00 3:00 12:00 3:00 4:00 olume * * * * 540 398 401 540 431 Daffi File: Rnute 47 North of Ronte 71 n:.,.�. c n�nnne n..__. . Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 xation :North of Route 71 Site: Route 47 gross St Date: 05/23/05 MPH Directio&B2 interval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week Begin 5/23 5/24 5/25 5/26 5/27 5/28 5/29 Avg Avg 12:AM 28 24 * * * * * 26 26 1:00 17 19 * * * * * 18 18 2:00 17 17 * * * * * 17 17 3:00 27 17 * * * * * 22 22 4:00 81 75 * * * * * 78 78 5:00 283 305 * * * * * 294 294 6:00 534 519 * * * * * 526 526 7:00 503 507 * * * * * 505 505 8:00 520 487 * * * * * 503 503 9:00 407 375 * * * * * 391 391 10:00 360 0 * * * * * 180 180 11:00 375 * * * * * * 375 375 12:PM 422 * * * * * * 422 422 1:00 390 * * * * * * 390 390 2:00 403 * * * * * * 403 403 3:00 492 * * * * * * 492 492 4:00 415 * * * * * * 415 415 5:00 362 * * * * * * 362 362 6:00 263 * * * * * * 263 263 7:00 253 * * * * * * 253 253 8:00 213 * * * * * * 213 213 9:00 110 * * * * * * 110 110 10:00 78 * * * * * * 78 78 11:00 44 * * * * * * 44 44 )tats 6,597 2,345 0 0 0 0 0 6,380 6,380 'M Peak 6:00 6:00 * * * * * 6:00 6:00 olume 534 519 * * * * * 526 526 —NI Peak 3:00 * * * * * * 3:00 3:00 olume 492 * * * * * * 492 492 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 ocation : Route 71 Site: Y00506 ,rocs.St : West of 47 Date: 05/16/05 4PH DirectionEB2 aterval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week tegin 5/16 5/17 5/18 5/19 5/20 5/21 5/22 Avg Avg 12:AM * * * 22 20 * * 21 21 1:00 * * * 20 19 * * 19 19 2:00 * * * 20 29 * * 24 24 3:00 * * * 45 40 * * 42 42 4:00 * * * 167 152 * * 159 159 5:00 * * * 442 483 * * 462 462 6:00 * * * 641 615 * * 628 628 7:00 * * * 476 457 * * 466 466 8:00 * * * 376 375 * * 375 375 9:00 * * * 294 * * * 294 294 10:00 * * * 275 * * * 275 275 11:00 * * * 264 * * * 264 264 12TM * * * 247 * * * 247 247 1:00 * * * 219 * * * 219 219 2:00 * * * 261 * * * 261 261 3:00 * * 119 275 * * * 197 197 4:00 * * 319 261 * * * 290 290 5:00 * * 287 244 * * * 265 265 6:00 * * 224 240 * * * 232 232 7:00 * * 175 114 * * * 144 144 8:00 * * 115 96 * * * 105 105 9:00 * * 106 90 * * * 98 98 10:00 * * 79 80 * * * 79 79 11:00 * * 34 36 * * * 35 35 Aals 0 0 1,458 5,205 2,190 0 0 5,201 5,201 M Peak * * * 6:00 6:00 * * 6:00 6:00 olume * * * 641 615 * * 628 628 'M Peak * * 4:00 3:00 * * * 4:00 4:00 olume * * 319 275 * * * 290 290 flub.CY_. nY.�_•1w_j_l�.f ir:n� � _ _°'�___ _ _ Engineering Enterprises,Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,IL 60554 .ovation : Route 71 Site: Y00506 gross St : West of 47 Date: 05/16/05 MPH DirectionWB2 interval Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Weekday Week Begin 5/16 5/17 5118 5119 5/20 5/21 5/22 Avg Avg 12:AM * * * 41 49 * * 45 45 1:00 * * * 35 32 * * 33 33 2:00 * * * 21 26 * * 23 23 3:00 * * * 32 20 * * 26 26 4:00 * * * 32 26 * * 29 29 5:00 * * * 73 71 * * 72 72 6:00 * * * 122 159 * * 140 140 7:00 * * * 224 223 * * 223 223 8:00 * * * 212 249 * * 230 230 9:00 * * * 171 * * * 171 171 10:00 * * * 201 * * * 201 201 11:00 * * * 227 * * * 227 227 12:PM * * * 218 * * * 218 218 1:00 * * * 236 * * * 236 236 2:00 * * * 291 * * * 291 291 3:00 * * 336 549 * * * 442 442 4:00 * * 603 566 * * * 584 584 5:00 * * 526 532 * * * 529 529 6:00 * * 365 346 * * * 355 355 7:00 * * 236 235 * * * 235 235 8:00 * * 218 168 * * * 193 193 9:00 * * 174 184 * * * 179 179 10:00 * * 105 118 * * * 111 111 11:00 * * 93 85 * * * 89 89 otals 0 0 2,656 4,919 855 0 0 4,882 4,882 'M Peak * * * 11:00 8:00 * * 8:00 8:00 olume * * * 227 249 * * 230 230 "M Peak * * 4:00 4:00 * * * 4:00 4:00 olume * * 603 566 * * * 584 584 ,311vi L nCFV1 L rage 1 or 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47NanEmmon Rd Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 Jurisdiction IDOT Time Period 2005 AM Peak nalysis Year 2005 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group LTR LTR L TR L TR Volume(v ph) 40 10 5 15 15 60 5 750 20 45 590 10 % Heavv veh 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 3 0 17 0 PHF a95 0.95 a95 a95 a95 a95 a95 0.95 0.95 0.95 a95 a95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. areen 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 1 2.0 12.0 Arrival type 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedBike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N -6 N N 3 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 13.0 1 3.0 3.0 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl.Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G = 14.0 IG = G= G = G= 3.0 G= 88.0 IG= G = IY= 6 ly= Y= IY= IY= 3 Y= 6 jY= Y= Duration of Analysis hrs =a25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 58 95 5 810 47 632 Lane group cap. 149 1188 556 1247 408 1173 /c ratio 0.39 1 0.51 laol a65 0.12 a54 Green ratio 0.12 1 10.12 a78 a73 0.78 a73 Unif.delay dl 49.0 49.7 4.1 8.1 6.0 7.1 Delay factor k all 0.11 0.11 a23 0.11 0.14 Increm. delay d2 1.7 2.2 0.0 1.2 1 0.1 a5 F factor 1.000 1 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11,000 Control delay 50.7 52.0 4.1 9.4 6.1 7.6 Lane group LOS D D A A A A pprch.delay 50.7 52.0 1 9.3 7.5 Approach LOS D D A A Intersec. delay 12.5 Intersection LOS B HCS2Wd M Copyright 02000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.le file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\sgrabowski.SUGARGROVE\Local%20Settings\... 7/28/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT eneral Information Site Information nalyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47WanEmmon Rd Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 Jurisdiction IDOT rime Period 2005 PM Peak 1A nalysis Year 2005 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 i 1 1 0 1 1 0 an e.group LTR LTR L TR L TR olume(v ph) 70 20 10 25 20 85 15 775 25 50 845 20 %Heavy veh 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 1 0 PHF a95 0.95 0.95 a95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A I A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 70 2.0 Ext. eff.green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedBike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 1 12.0 1 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N -6 N N 3 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 21.0 . G= G= G= G= 7.0 G= 77.0 IG= JG= IY= 6 jY= Y= Y= JY= 3 Y= 6 jY= IY= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca aci Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj.flow rate 106 136 16 842 53 910 ane group cap. 206 279 301 1203 334 1141 /c ratio 0.51 0.49 0.05 0.70 10.16 0.80 Green ratio a 17 0.17 0.73 0.64 0.73 0.64 Unif. delay di 44.9 144.6 12.8 14.0 112 15.8 Delay factor k 0.12 10.11 0.11 0.27 0.11 0.34 Increm.delay d2 2.2 1.3 0.1 1.8 10.2 4.1 PF factor 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 Control delay 47.1 46.0 12.9 15.8 11.4 19.8 ne group LOS D D B B B B pprch.delay 47.1 46.0 15.8 19.4 pproach LOS D D ;B B Intersec. delay 1 21.1 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e file.-//C-\T)nriimentc%n2nandOln?.O4Pttinvc\curahnwcki Q TTCtARrTR OVF.\i,ral%,')f1CPttinac\ 7/7wrinS Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47/Fox Rd Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 Purisdiction IDOT Time Period 2005 AM Peak nalysis Year 2005 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group LTR LTR L TR L TR Volume(v ph) 140 15 45 5 5 10 30 625 30 5 585 40 %Heavy veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHI 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff.green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 . 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 PedBike/RTOR Volume 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 4 ane Width 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 - 12.0 12.0 arking/Grade/Parking N -6 N N 2 N N -3 N N 5 N arking/hr us stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 hasin EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 G = 18.0 G = G= G= G= 3.0 G= 84.0 G= G= Iming Y= 6 Y= Y= IY= JY= 3 Y= 6 IY= jY= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj.flow rate 206 19 32 686 5 654 ne group cap. 217 241 481 1315 440 1260 /c ratio 0.95 0.08 0.07 0.52 0.01 0.52 reen ratio 0.15 1 0.15 0.75 0.70 0.75 10.70 nif.delay d1 50.5 43.9 5.7 8.5 5.8 8.5 Delay factor k 0.46 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.11 a 12 Increm. delay d2 46.8 0.1 10.1 0.4 0.0 0.4 F factor 1.000 1 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 97.4 44.0 5.7 8.9 5.8 8.9 ane group LOS F D A A A A pprch.delay 97.4 44.0 8.7 8.8 Approach LOS F D A A Intersec. delay 20.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e file_//C:\Documents%20and%20Settinl?s\sgrabowski.SIJGARCiROVF\i.c)cal%20Settinstc\... 7/IR1?.ffl5 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information [ntersection ts Information Analyst WDC Illinois 47/Fox Rd Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc rea Type All other areas Date Performed 5117 12005 risdiction MOT Time Period 2005 PM Peak nalysis Year 2005 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group LTR LTR L TR L TR olume(v ph) 110 20 45 15 35 25 30 625 5 5 565 40 Heavy veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ctuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A tartup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 eff.green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 nit Extension 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 edBike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ane Width 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parkirig/Grade/Parking N -6 N N 1 2 N N -3 N N 5 N Parking/hr us stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 nit Extension 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 13.0 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 Excl.Left NS Perm 07 08 G = 14.0 JG= G = G= JG= 7.0 G= 84.0 G= G= Iming IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 3 Y= 6 IY= Y= uration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca acit Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 184 79 32 663 5 637 ane group cap. 166 186 553 1322 514 1259 /c ratio 1.11 0.42 0.06 0.50 0.01 0.51 reen ratio 0.12 0.12 0.78 0.70 a78 0.70 Unif.delay d1 53.0 49.3 4.6 8.3 4.7 8.4 Delay factor k 0.50 all 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 101.9 1.6 0.0 a3 0.0 0.3 PF factor 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 154.9 50.8 4.6 8.6 4.7 8.7 ane group LOS F D A A A A pprch. delay 154.9 50.8 8.4 8.7 Approach LOS F D A A Intersec.delay 27.5 Intersection LOS C HCswodrm Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version Cle file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\sgrabowski.SUGARGROVE\L,ocal%20Settings\... 7/28/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47 1111inois 71 Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 Purisdiction IDOT Time Period 2005 AM Peak nalysis Year 2005 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane group L TR L TR L T R L T R Volume (v ph) 145 300 10 95 195 40 10 280 75 85 250 45 %Heav veh 16 8 10 28 12 0 13 31 19 18 33 31 PHF 0.74 0.73 0.42 0.86 0.82 0.63 0.50 0.93 0.80 0.69 0.87 0.72 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 arking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 1 N N -3 N N 3 N arking/hr us stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03.0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin Excl. Left EB Only EW Perm 04 Excl.Left NS Perm 07 08 G= 11.0 G= 6.0 EY=E6 5.0 G= G= 12.0 G= 25.0 G= G= luring Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= Y= 3 Y= 6 IY= Y= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 100.0 Lane Group Ca a ity, Control Del y, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj.flow rate 196 435 110 301 20 301 94 123 287 62 ane group cap. 433 593 321 420 325 388 345 293 370 304 /c ratio 0.45 10.73 10.34 0.72 10.06 10.78 0.27 0.42 0.78 0.20 reen ratio 0.48 0.34 1 0.36 0.25 10.40 0.25 0.25 0.40 0.25 0.25 Unif.delay d1 16.9 29.0 22.3 34.3 119.3 34.9 30.2 20.9 34.9 29.6 Delay factor k 0.11 0.29 0.11 0.28 0.11 0.33 0.11 0.11 0.33 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.8 4.7 0.6 5.8 0.1 9.5 0.4 1.0 10.0 0.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 17.7 33.7 22.9 40.1 19.3 44.4 30.6 21.9 44.8 30.0 ane group LOS B C C D B D C C D C pprch. delay 28.7 35.5 40.1 36.9 pproach LOS C D D D Intersec.delay 34.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000M Copyright C 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.le file-//C-\17ocilment.g%20ancl%2n4ettingc\cvrahnwcki.Si TCTARCTROVPAl.oral%2(1Settinac\... 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47 1I11inois 71 Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 Jurisdiction IDOT rime Period 2005 PM Peak nalysis Year 2005 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane group L TR L TR L T R L T R Volume (v ph) 105 155 15 90 360 65 20 246 80 65 295 160 %Heavyveh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedBike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 nit N 0 N N 0 1 N N -3 N I N 3 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 #OA#3,�O 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 130 1 3.0 3,0 Phasing Excl. Left WB Only EW Perm 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 riming G= 5.0 G = 3.0 G= 34.0 JG= G= 7.0 G= 30.0 G= G= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 6 IY= Y= 3 Y= 6 Y= Y= uration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Pycle Length C= 100.0 Lane Group Ca a ity, Control Del y, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 111 179 95 447 21 259 84 68 311 168 ane group cap. 363 625 552 728 314 597 482 344 579 468 /c ratio 0.31 0.29 0.17 0.61 0.07 0.43 0.17 0.20 0.54 0.36 reen ratio 0.39 0.34 0.48 0.40 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.30 0.30 Unif.delay d1 20.0 24.1 14.6 23.9 19.3 28.2 25.9 19.5 29.2 27.5 Delay factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.20 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.5 0.3 0.1 1.6 10.1 0.5 0.2 10.3 1.0 0.5 F factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1ontrol delay 20.5 24.4 14.7 25.4 19,4 28.7 26.0 19.8 30.2 27.9 ne group LOS C C B C B C C B C C pprch. delay 22.9 23.5 27.5 28.2 Approach LOS C C I C C Intersec.delay 25.7 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e file-//C'.-\Document.%2(land%2O Setting s�cQrahnwski_STTC;ARC.rROVF.\T org1%20Settinac\ 7/2R/2.O(15 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47NanEmmon Rd Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 udsdiction IDOT Time Period 2020 AM Peak Frialysis Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume(v ph) 135 10 5 15 15 60 5 1425 20 45 985 40 K.Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 3 0 17 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated P/A A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 Ext.eff.green 2.0 . 2.0 12.0. 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 FN 3 3 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ed/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 6 0 2 0 4 ne Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 arking/Grade/Parking N 0 N 0 N N -6 N N 3 N Parking/hr us stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 1 13.0 13.0 1 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing Excl. Left I EB Only EW Perm 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G = 6.0 G = 5.0 G= 13.0 G = JG= 3.0 G= 72.0 G= G= IY= 3 JY= 3 Y= 6 jY= JY= 3 Y= 6 Y= jY= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca aci Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 142 16 16 73 5 1519 47 1075 Lane group cap. 323 317 244 180 277 1943 175 1827 /c ratio 0.44 0.05 0.07 0.41 0.02 0.78 10.27 0,59 Green ratio 0.25 0.17 0.16 0.11 0.65 0.60 0.65 0.60 Unif.delay dl 36.8 41.2 42.9 49.9 19.4 18.1 10,9 14.8 Delay factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 10.11 0.11 0.33 1 0.11 0.18 Increm. delay d2 1.0 0.1 0.1 11.5 10.0 2.1 0,8 0.5 F factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.438 0.575 1.000 1.000 Fane trol delay 37.8 8 41.3 43,0 51.4 4.1 12.5 11.7 15.3 group LOS D D D D A B B rch.delay 38.1 49.9 12.5 15.2 Approach LOS D D B B Intersec. delay 16.1 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright®1000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.le file:HC:\Documents and Settings\wchomomazV-ocal Settiwzs\Temn\s2k81.tmn 7/29/20015 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47/VanEmmon Rd Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 Jurisdiction IDOT Time Period 2020 PM Peak 1A nalysis Year 220 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume (v ph) 135 20 10 1 25 20 85 15 1330 25 50 1545 110 %Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 3 0 17 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 12.0 70 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Ext.eff. green 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 1 3 1 3 3 4 4 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 1 0 8 0 2 0 11 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N -6 N N 3 N Parking/hr I I I E us stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 1 08 Timing G= 5.0 1 G= 22.0 G = G= G= 5.0 G= 70.0 JG= I G= IY= 3 JY= 6 Y= IY= Y= 3 Y= 6 ly= ly= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca aci Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 142 30 26 102 16 1424 53 1730 ane group cap. 283 333 297 304 142 1889 215 1776 /c ratio 0.50 0.09 0.09 0.34 0.11 0.75 0.25 0.97 reen ratio 0.25 0.18 0.25 0.18 1 0.65 0.58 0.65 0.58 Unif.delay dl 40.0 40.7 34.4 42.6 1 18.7 18.6 110.6 24.1 Delay factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.31 0.11 0.48 Increm. delay d2 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.4 1.8 0.6 15.6 F factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.438 0.613 1,000 1.000 ontrol delay 41.4 40.8 34.5 43.3 8.6 13.2 11.2 39.8 ane group LOS D D C D A B B D pprch. delay 41.3 t 41.5 13.1 38.9 Approach LOS D O B D Intersec. delay 28.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.le file://CADocuments and Settings\wchornomazU"al Settings\Temn\s2k8D.tmn 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47/Fox Rd Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 711112005 Jurisdiction IDOT Time Period 2020 AM Peak nalysis Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR. L TR L TR L TR Volume(v ph) 225 15 45 5 5 10 30 1125 5 5 900 70 % Heavy veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival e 3 3 3 U21 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3. 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 4 0 D 3 0 7 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12. 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N -6 N N N -3 N N 5 N Parking/hr us stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3. 3.0 13.0 Phasin Excl. Left EB Only EW Perm 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 7.0 EG 14.0 G= G = 8.0 G = 60.0 G= G= Y= 3 Y= 3 6 Y= Y= 3 Y= 6 IY= IY= Duration of Analysis hrs =0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca aci Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj.flow rate 237 59 5 14 32 1186 5 1013 ane group cap. 436 342 301 194 289 1800 228 1712 /c ratio 0.54 0.17 0.02 0.07 0.11 0.66 0.02 0.59 reen ratio 0.31 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.59 0.50 0.59 0.50 Unif.delay di 33.2 39.8 38.5 47.2 13.0 22.4 14.3 21.3 Delay factor k 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.23 0.11 0.18 Increm.delay d2 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 10.2 0.9 0.0 0.6 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ntrol delay 34.6 40.0 38.5 474 13.2 23.3 14.3 21.9 Lane group LOS C D D D B C B C pprch. delay 35.7 45.0 1 23.0 21.8 Approach LOS D D C C Intersec. delay 24.2 Intersection LOS C Hcs2oodm Copyright 0 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.le fileWCADocuments and Settings4chomomaz\Local Settings\Temn\s2k39.tmn 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47/Fox Rd Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 711112005 Jurisdiction IDOT Time Period 2020 PM Peak nalysis Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane group L TR L TR L TR L TR Volume (v ph) 155 20 45 15 35 25 55 1130 5 10 1345 235 %Heavy veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 jo.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 lo.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedBike/RTOR Volume 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 24 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N -6 N N 2 N N -3 N N 5 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing Excl. Left I EB Only EW Perm 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 G= 10.0 G= 5.0 G= 15.0 G= G= 8.0 G= 61.0 G= G= Timing G= 3 JY= 3 Y= 6 IY= JY= 3 Y= 6 IY= IY= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca acit y, Control Dela and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 163 64 16 62 58 1193 11 1638 ne group cap. 411 331 311 217 183 1829 254 1722 V ratio 0.40 0.19 0.05 0.29 0.32 0.65 0.04 0.95 een ratio 0.30 0.19 0.21 0.13 0.60 0.51 0.60 0.51 Unif.delay d1 32.5 40.7 38.0 47.6 21.9 21.7 12.4 28.1 Delay factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.23 0.11 0.46 Increm. delay d2 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.1 12.1 F factor 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 0.575 0.754 0.575 0.754 ntrol delay 33.1 41.0 38.0 48.4 13.6 17.2 7.2 33.3 ppirch.ne group LOS C D D D B B A C delay 35.3 46.2 17.0 33.1 Approach LOS D D B C Intersec. delay 27.3 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e file_HC_\Documents and SettinLrs\wchornomaz\Local SettinQS\Temn\.s2k45.tmn 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47/Greenbriar Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 711112005 Palysis risdiction IDOT Time Period 2020 AM Peak Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Num.of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 Lane group L R L T TR Volume (v ph) 245 210 85 855 580 90 %Heavy veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 4 4 4 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedBike/RTOR Volume 0 23 0 0 1 6 -ne Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 arking/Grade/Parking N -6 N N N N -3 N N 5 N Parking/hr us stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 hasin EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 I G= 32.0 G = G= G= G= 10.0 G = 53.0 G ming = G= IY= 6 Y= Y= IY= IY= 3 Y= 6 IY= 1Y= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 110.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 258 197 89 900 699 ne group cap. 530 712 462 2160 1635 /C ratio 0.49 0.28 0.19 0.42 0.43 een ratio 0.29 9 0.44 0.60 0.60 0.48 Unif.delay dl 32.2 19.9 9.9 11.7 18.6 Delay factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 bF factor 1.000 11.000 0.575 0.575 0.794 ntrol delay 32.9 20.1 5.9 6.9 14.9 ne group LOS C C A A B prch.delay 27.4 6.8 14.9 Approach LOS C A B Intersec.delay 13.8 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e fileWCADocuments and SettineAwchomomaiTocal Settineffemn\sW Ltmo 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47IGreenbriar Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 711112005 Jurisdiction IDOT rime Period 2020 PM Peak nalysis Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 Lane group L R L T TR olume (v ph) 135 150 230 705 945 295 % Heavy veh 2 2 2 2 2 2 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ctuated P/A A A A A A A tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival e 3 3 4 4 4 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 15 0 0 29 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N -6 N N N N -3 N N 5 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 [3.0 1 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 thai in EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 ng G= 27.0 G= G= G= G= .10.0 G= 58.0 G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 11y= 3 Y= 6 IY= IY- Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 110.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 142 142 242 742 1275 ane group cap. 447 638 294 2446 1763 /c ratio 0.32 0.22 0.82 0.30 0.72 reen ratio 0.25 0.39 0.65 0.65 0.53 Unif,delay dl 34.0 22.3 15.4 8.6 19.9 Delay factor k 0.11 0.11 0.36 0.11 0.28 Increm. delay d2 0.4 0.2 17.0 0.1 1.5 PF factor 1.000 1 1.000 0.452 10.452 1 0.722 ontrol delay 34.4 22.5 24.0 4.0 15.8 ane group LOS C C C A B pprch. delay 28.5 8.9 15.8 Approach LOS C A B ntersec. delay 14.6 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.le fileWCADocuments and Settings\wchomomaz\Local Settings\Temn\s2k5D.tmn 7/29/2005 Jnorl xeport Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47 1I111nois 71 Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 Jurisdiction IDOT Time Period 2020 AM Peak nalysis Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ane group L TR L TR L TR L T R olume (v ph) 385 685 225 145 380 90 90 440 110 135 495 1190 %Heavy veh 16 8 10 28 12 0 13 31 19 18 33 31 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ctuated(P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext.eff.green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 22 0 9 0 11 0 19 Lane Width 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N -3 N N 3 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 hasin Excl. Left EB Only EW Perm 04 1 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 iming G= 9.0 G= 10.0 G= 30.0 G = G= 8.0 G = 32.0 G= G= Y= 3 Y= 3 Y= 6 Y= Y= 3 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 110.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Dela 1, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 405 935 153 485 95 567 142 521 180 ane group cap. 451 1259 226 874 268 806 228 820 662 /c ratio 0.90 0.74 0.68 0.55 10.35 0.70 0.62 0.64 0.27 reen ratio 0.50 0.39 0.35 0.27 10.39 0.29 0.39 0.29 0.55 Unif.delay d1 20.2 28.8 25.8 34.3 22.7 34.8 23.9 133.9 13.3 Delay factor k 0.42 0.30 0.25 0.15 0.11 0.27 0.21 10.22 0.11 Increm. delay d2 20.4 2.4 79 0.8 0.8 2.8 5.2 1.6 0.2 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 40.7 31.2 33.6 35.1 23.5 37.6 29.1 35.6 13.6 ne group LOS D C C D C D C D B pprch. delay 34.0 34.7 35.5_ 29.8 Approach LOS C C D C Intersec.delay 33.4 Intersection LOS C HCS2000 M Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e fileWCADocuments and Settings\wchornomaz\L.ocal Settings\Temv\s2k69.tmv 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Illinois 47 1I11inois 71 Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 Jurisdiction IDOT Time Period 2020 PM Peak 1A nalysis Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH I RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Lane group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume(v ph) 260 460 165 170 915 195 225 460 115 135 515 445 %Heavy veh 16 8 10 28 12 0 13 31 19 18 33 31 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 a95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff, green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 16 0 19 0 11 0 44 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N -3 N N 3 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 13.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 M Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 G = 18.0 G = 38.0 G= G= G= 10.0 G = 36.0 G = G= Y= 3 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 3 Y= 6 Y= Y= Analysis hrs = 0.25_ Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca acity, Control De v. and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 274 484 157 179 963 185 237 484 109 142 542 422 Lane group cap. 293 1117 661 366 1077 727 276 885 689 277 846 607 /c ratio 0.94 0.43 0.24 0.49 0.89 0.25 0.86 0.55 ' 0.16 0.51 0.64 0.70 Green ratio 0.49 0.32 10.45 0.49 10.32 0.45 0.41 0.30 0.50 0.41 0.30 10.50 Unif.delay di 35.7 32.5 20.3 18.8 39.1 20.5 38.4 35.2 16.3 24.2 36.4 23.0 Delay factor k 0.45 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.42 0.11 0.39 0.15 0.11 0.12 0.22 0.26 Increm.delay d2 35.8 0.3 0.2 1.0 9.8 0.2 22.8 0.7 0.1 1.6 1.7 3.5 PF factor 1.000 .1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ntrol delay 71.5 32.7 20.5 19.8 48.9 20.7 61.1 35.9 16.4 25.8 38.0 26.5 Lane group LOS E C C B D C E D B C D C pprch.delay 42.2 41.0 40.5 32.1 pproach LOS D D D C Intersec. delay 38.8 Intersection LOS D HCs20odm Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e file://C:\Documents and SettingAwchomomaz\ =al Settings\Temv\s2k75.tmn 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Intersection IL 71 at E. Collector Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 7/28/2005 rn'alysis sdiction Time Period AM 2020 Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume (v ph) 20 1060. 480 45 100 65 %Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated 'P/A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 edBike/RTOR Volume 0 4 0 0 6 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N I N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 1 3.0 hasin EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 G= 10.0 G = 70.0 G= G= G: 25.0 G= G = G= Timing Y= 3 Y= 6 Y= Y= JY= 6 Y= Y= 1Y= uration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca aci Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj.flow rate 21 1116 505 43 105 62 ne group cap. 555 1314 1108 942 376 1336 /c ratio 0.04 0.85 0.46 0.05 0.28 0.18 reen ratio 0.69 0.69 0.58 0.58 0.21 0.21 Unif.delay d1 7.4 13.8 14.2 10.7 39.9 39.1 elay factor k 0.11 0.38 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.0 5.5 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.3 F factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ntrol delay 7.4 19.3 14.5 10.7 40.3 39.4 Lane group LOS A B j B B D D pprch. delay 19.1 14.2 40.0 Approach LOS B B D Intersec.delay 19.5 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.le fileWCADocuments and Settings\wchomomaz\L.ocal Settin2s\TemD\s2k21.tmD 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Intersection IL 71 at E. Collector Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 712812005 Jurisdiction Time Period PM 2020 nalysis Year 2020- Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume(v ph) 70 650 1195 280 75 45 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A 't artup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext.eff.green 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 nit Extension 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 4 0 0 6 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ##31.0 3.0 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Iming G = 7.0 G = 79.0 G= G= G= 19.0 G= G= G= IY= 3 Y= 6 Y= IY= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 i Cvcle Len th C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca aci Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 74 684 1258 291 79 41 ane group cap. 169 1409 1251 1063 286 256 /c ratio 0.44 0.49 1.01 0.27 0.28 0.16 reen ratio 0.74 10.74 0.66 10.66 1 0.16 0.16 Unif. delay dl 30.5 6.3 20.5 8.5 44.4 43.6 Delay factor k 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.11 *0.11 10.11 Increm.delay d2 1.8 0.3 126.8 0.1 10.5 10.3 PF factor 1.000 11.000 1 1.000 1.000 1 11.000 1.000 ontrol delay 32.4 6.5 47.3 8.7 45.0 43.9 ne group LOS C A D A D D pprch.delay 9.0 40.1 1 44.6 pproach LOS A D D Intersec. delay 30.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e fileWCADocuments and Settings\wchomomaz\L.ocal Settings\Temp\s2k2D.tmv 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Intersection IL 71 at W. Collector Agency or Co. Area Type All other areas Date Performed 712812005 Jurisdiction Time Period AM 2020 1A nalysis Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes i 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 Lane group L TR L T R L TR L TR Volume (v ph) 25 975 0 120 485 55 0 0 15 105 0 65 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0• 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated (P/A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time P.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. areen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 6 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 1.2:0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 1 08 -riming G = 6.0 G= 70.0 G = G= G= 29.0 G= G= JG= IY= 3 IY= 6 Y= IY= JY= 6 Y= IY= ly= Duration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 cle Len th C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca aci ty, Control Dela 1, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 26 1026 21 511 52 0 15 111 62 Lane group cap. 490 1251 143 1108 942 329 390 343 390 /c ratio 0.05 0.82 0.15 0.46 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.32 0.16 Green ratio 0.66 0.66 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Unif. delay d1 8.8 15.2 11.4 14.3 10.8 34.5 34.8 37.4 35.9 Delay factor k 0.11 0.36 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.0 4.5 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.2 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 8.8 19.7 11.9 14.6 10.8 34.5 34.9 38.0 36.1 Lane group LOS A B B B B C C D D pprch. delay 19.4 14.1 34.9 37.3 Approach LOS B B C D Intersec. delay 19.6 Intersection LOS B HCS2000TM Copyright®2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e fileWCADocuments and SettiuAwchornomaz\Local Settines\Temn\s21cA2.tmn 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst Intersection IL 71 at W. Collector Agency or Co. Area Type All otherareas Date Performed 712812005 Jurisdiction rime Period PM 2020 nalysis Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num.of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 an group L TR L T R L TR L TR oil (v ph) 75 625 0 20 1205 175 0 0 15 75 0 45 % Heavy veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 jo.95 a95 jo.95 a95 a95 a95 a95 a95 a95 Actuated (P/A) A A A I A A A A A A A A A Startup lost time 2.0 12.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext.eff. green 2.0 12.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedBike/RTOR Volume 0 1 0 0 18 0 1 0 4 Lane Width 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking/hr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 3.0 13.0 3.0 1 3.0 13.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasing EB Onl EW Perm 03 1 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 iming G= 7.0 G= 79.0 G = G= G= 19.0 G= G JG = IY= 3 IY= 6 Y= IY= IY= 6 Y= Y= IY= uration of Analysis hrs 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Dela 1, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB dj.flow rate 79 658 21 1268 165 0 15 79 43 ane group cap. 169 1409 507 1251 1063 219 256 225 256 /c ratio 0.47 10.47 0.04 1.01 0.16 0.00 0.06 0.35 0.17 reen ratio 0.74 0.74 1 0.66 ja66 a66 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Unif.delay dl 30.6 6.1 7.2 20.5 7.8 42.5 42.9 45.0 43.7 elay factor k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.50 0.11 0,11 0.11 all all Increm. delay d2 2.0 0.2 0.0 28.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.3 F factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ntrol delay 32.7 6.4 7.2 49.4 7.9 42.5 43.0 1 46.0 44.0 ane group LOS C I A A I D A D d D D D pprch.delay 9.2 44.0 43.0 45.3 Approach LOS A D D D ntersec.delay 33.1 Intersection LOS C HCS2Wd M Copyright a 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e file:HCADocuments and Settings\wchomomaz\Local Settings\Temp\s2k21.tmp 7/29/2005 .'sivi L i.XGYvi L rage i or 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Pavilion/lllinois 71 Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 Judscliction IDOT rime Period 2020 PM Peak nalysis Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R Volume (v ph) 20 655 1145 175 55 45 Heavy veh 16 8 12 1 0 18 31 PHF 0.95 jo.95 0.95 la95 0.95 0.95 Actuated(P/A) A A A A A A §tartup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 Ext.eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 Arrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 PedBike/RTOR Volume 0 9 0 0 19 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 3 N Parking/hr us stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Unit Extension 13.0 13.0 1 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Iming G= 4.0 G= 79.0 G= G= G= 22.0 G= G= G= Y= 3 Y= 6 Y= IY= IY= 6 Y= IY= IY= uration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca aci Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 21 689 11205 175 58 27 Lane group cap. 112 1327 1176 1063 276 223 /c ratio 0.19 0.52 1.02 0.16 0.21 0.12 Green ratio 0.72 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.18 1 0.18 Unif.delay d1 30.6 7.7 20.5 79 41.6 40.9 Delay factor k 0.11 0.12 10.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.8 0.4 32.7 0.1 0.4 0.2 F factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Vntrol delay 31.4 8.0 53.2 79 42.0 41.2 ane group LOS C A D A D D erch. delay 8.7 47.4 41,7 Approach LOS A D D Intersec.delay 34.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida,All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e fileWCADocuments and Settines\wchomomaz\Local Settines\Temn\s2k15.tmn 7/29/2005 Short Report Page 1 of 1 SHORT REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst WDC Intersection Pavilion/lllinois 71 Agency or Co. Engineering Enterprises Inc Area Type All other areas Date Performed 511712005 Jurisdiction IDOT Time Period 2020 AM Peak nalysis Year 2020 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Num. of Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Lane group L T T R L R olume(v ph) 15 865 505 95 125 70 %Heavy veh 16 8 12 0 18 31 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ctuated P/A A A A A A A tartu lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival e 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ed/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 9 0 0 19 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking/Grade/Parking N 0 N N 0 N N N N 3 N Parking/hr us stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Phasin EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Iming G= 10.0 G = 60.0 G= G = G= 35.0 G= G= G= Y= 3 Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= uration of Analysis hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C= 120.0 Lane Group Ca acit Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Adj.flow rate 16 911 532 91 132 54 ane group cap. 359 1127 893 808 440 354 /c ratio 0.04 0.81 0.60 0.11 0.30 0.15 reen ratio 0.61 10.61 0.50 10.50 1 0.29 10.29 nif. delay d1 12.0 18.1 21.4 15.9 33.0 31.5 Delay factor k 0.11 0.35 0.18 0.11 0.11 0.11 Increm. delay d2 0.1 4.5 1.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 ontrol delay 12.1 22.6 22.5 16.0 33.4 31.7 ne group LOS B C C B C C prch. delay 22.4 21.5 32.9 Approach LOS C C C ntersec.delay 23.2 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright m 2000 University of Florida.All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e file-//C.-V7nciime.ntc and Rettinp,c\wchmmnma7.\1.ncAl Setfnuc\Temn\c2k9Jmn 7/29/2005 December 2000 Page 4C-9 r: Figure 4CA Warrant 3, Peak Hour 600 S > 600 LIU: 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES �W a0 400 2 OR ORE LAN &1 LANE a Cr Q 300 1 LANE&1 LANE Z j 200 JO •150 > 100 `100 2 C'3 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note:150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street I approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. q 7 /G re 66"991 AR Figure 4G4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour(70% Factor) I (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h(40 mph)ON MAJOR STREET) Am v`. a 400 2 OR MORE LANES&2�MORE LANE i W 0 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LANE F- � 300 / \ - ' CO Q 1 LANE&1 LANE `/So Rio m I Z � 200 � J h • tp '7 U' 100 60 tV C 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 I MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note:100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-etreet approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street ' approach with one lane. June 2001 Sect 40.05 I December 2000 Page 4C-9 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 600 j 500 2 OR MORE LANES&20R MORE LANES 2 Q 400 W O 2 OR ORE LNES&1 LANE a ►°C- a 300 a Q 1 LANE&1 LANE ZW WM 200 p °150 >0 2 100 '100 0 2 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) `Note:150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 7I / EAST Ac.c£55 Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour(70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h(40 mph)ON MAJOR STREET) n kn ! a �U 400 20-R MORE LANES&2 OI MORE LANE Q t /C. UJ O 20 1 R MORE LANES&1 LANE Q Ir 300 Q 1 LANE&1 LANE (t��) 4c, O 200 z D AM p X Fri 100 1 1100 0 •75 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 I MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) ' *Note:100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower t threshold volume for a minotatreet approach with one lane. i June 2001 Sect 40.05 I December 2000 Page 4C-9 fl-9 Figure 4C,3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 600 j 500 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES Q 400 p 2 OR ORE W ES&1 LANE � 1�- d 300 Q 1 LANE&1 LANE Z j 200 p '150 100 100 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note:150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 7// W&sr Access o Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour(70/ Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h(40 mph)ON MAJOR STREET) N h 7 V v 1 V 400 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANE i p 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LANE Q d 300 � Q 1 LANE&1 LANE . cc Z 200 = 100 X '100 C7 75 I = 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 I MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) I *Note:100 vph applies as the lower threshbld volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. I " June 2001 Sect W-05 I December 2000 Page 4C-9 ` t Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 600 x > 500 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES x �.. U 400 W Q 2 OR ORE ES&1 LANE CL 300 Q Q 1 LANE&1 LANE Z j 200 � J O '150 = 100 '100 C7 x 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note:150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 7/ 1PAVILlot'.1 Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour(70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h(40 mph)ON MAJOR STREET),--N n Q400 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES 5�`�5 IQ 300 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LANE �)/$ .� v s F- �0_ d 1 LANE&1 LANE m I O 200 z Am > 100 "100 � I 0 '75 x 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) ' 'Note:100 vph applies as the lover threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach wNh one lane. June 2001 Sect,4005 December 2000 Page 4C-7 Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume = 500 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES = 400 Q 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LANE d300 1 LANE&1 LANE CL Q 0 2 200 zD � J O 100 115 _ 80 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note:115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 14-7 G2EeagIz1Alf- Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h(40 mph)ON MAJOR STREET) _ VC5 a* AF = 400 COF� Pa CL I2 �2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES Q 300 W O 2 OR MORE LANES I&1 LANE I � a Zx Ph CO Q 200 1 LANE&I LANE (pal: Pc O W I Z � O) 100 _ 80 I 0 _ 60 200 300 400 500 600 700 800. 900 1000 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note:80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. June 2001 Sect.40.04 December 2000 Page 4C-7 Ash, Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume (IF = 500 CL > 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES = 400 UQ 20 MORE LANES&1 LANE d 300 1 LANE&1 LANE � a a O 2 200 z :) 2 J O 100 -115 _ '80 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) `Note:115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street I approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 71 I �ASt AGGE55 Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h(40 mph) ON MAJOR STREET) I = 400 a 2 �2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES Q 300 I u1 Q 2 OR MORE LANESI&1 LANE Q a Q Q 200 1 LANE&1.LANE W z � 9 100 —� — _ v kVo _ '60 I200 300 400 500 600 700 800. 900 1000 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) ' *Note:80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-str eet approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. June 2001 Sem 4CA4 December 2000 Page 4C-7 Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume = Soo a 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES > = 400 Q 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LAME � a 300 1 LANE&1 LANE F- 0 a o w 200 z � O 100 `115 I *80 I 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note:115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street I approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower. threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 7// wcat A c-c-Ess Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h(40 mph)ON MAJOR STREET) I = 400 a- > = 'OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES t Q 300 W O 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LANE cc cf) CL Q 200 1 LANE&1 LANE O � t7o J O 100 > Z,. PH 0 80 _ `60 200 300 400 500 600 700 800. 900 1000 MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note:80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. June 2001 Sect.4C.04 December 2000 Page 4C-7 Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume = 500 CL 2 OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES = 400 UQ 2 OR MORE LANES&1 LAME � d 300 1 LANE&1 LANE a. Q 0 2 200 ZD � J O> 100 "115 2 "80 0 2 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note:115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minorstreet approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 7/ / PAvILIoQ Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume(70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h(40 mph)ON MAJOR STREET) M 400 > OR MORE LANES&2 OR MORE LANES W < 300 LLI H d 2 OR MORE LANES I&1 LANE CC Q 200 1 LANE&1 LANE OW a O 2; AH 100 I "60 5x f r1 I I200 300 400 500 600 700 800. 900 1000 MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) ' *Note:80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 60 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. June 2001 Sect 4C.04 VOLUME CONTROL MEASURES • FULL CLOSURE • HALF CLOSURE • DIAGONAL DIVERTERS • MEDIAN BARRIERS - FULLCLOSURE s - - 1 ! s HALFCLOSURE i DIAGONAL Y_ i., �} i -�• �, �.. _..._ .max a l� .I MEDIAN BARRIERS 't FORCEDTURNS f , In w i Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number � s► Legal City Council#1 Finance EST. -� __ 1836 City Administrator ^c ~- Parks and Recreation Tracking Number m Human Resources 3! �° =t� Community Development q' Police CC 2012-36 44LE Public Works Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Procedural Ordinance Amendment— Summer Meeting Schedule Meeting and Date: City Council —April 24, 2012 Synopsis: Request to revise Procedural Ordinance to establish a reduced meeting schedule during summer months. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Alderman Chris Funkhouser Name Department Agenda Item Notes: This item was added to the agenda at the request of Alderman Funkhouser, with consent from Aldermen Munns, Kot, Teeling, and Milschewski. Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid 1sa6 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: April 17, 2012 C<wrMY Sad �LE ��'` Subject: Summer schedule, staff impacts Administrative staff The Deputy Clerk and HR Manager spend almost every Friday constructing agendas and packets, and then publishing and distributing those agendas and packets. On average, each of them spends 10-15 hours per week on packet preparation. Eliminating four committee agendas and packets each month would achieve some modest reduction in the total time spent per month, but would consolidate the packet creation and printing time to only two days per month. This consolidation would result in more uninterrupted time per month to focus on records management (Deputy Clerk) and human resource functions (HR Manager). City Administrator I would prefer a summer reprieve of meetings and meeting preparation, for the reasons outlined below. My general observation is that the summer months tend have less agenda items for all meetings. From a personal perspective, I'd rather attend fewer, longer meetings per month. My weekly schedule revolves,primarily, around agenda and packet creation. The monthly meeting calendar results in a weekly cycle of agenda and packet deadlines. Every agenda and packet the City puts forth goes out the Friday before the meeting. So, let's take a look at the last week in March, which is the week prior to the first meetings in April. On Monday, March 26th, the senior staff members will hold a weekly kickoff meeting to go over happenings from the weekend, the upcoming week, and agendas for the following week. In this week, the Economic Development Committee and Public Safety Committee agenda will both get published on Friday. This means that we finalize at a staff level on Monday, whatever agenda items we think we need approved at the EDC and PS meeting the following week. We then have five days to vet all agenda items, communicate those agenda items with the corresponding chairman and the Mayor, thoroughly research any background information, draft the materials and then physically produce the packet. This is all done among the City Council meeting that is held that week(Tuesday, March 27th). So, the packet is finalized on Friday, I draft and send out the Administrator's Weekly and Elected Officials Report on Friday afternoon, and the week is done.' 'The Public Safety Committee meeting ended up getting cancelled that week,due to lack of agenda items. On Monday, April 2"d, the process starts again with the following week's meeting. For this week, we meet on Monday to discuss the following week's City Council and Park Board agendas. Again, we have a five day deadline to vet the agenda items, communicate with the chairman and Mayor, draft the materials, and physically produce the packet. This is all done among the Economic Development Committee meeting on Tuesday, and the Public Safety Committee on Thursday. The process continues each week thereafter; the week of Monday, April 9t11 we'll produce the Public Works and Administration Committee agendas,while holding the City Council and Park Board meetings. The week of April 16th, we'll produce the City Council and Park Board agendas while holding the Public Works and Administration Committee agendas. The week of April 23rd will result in the creation of the EDC and Public Safety agendas for the month of May, starting the cycle over. In the rare occasion where five Tuesdays or Thursdays occur in a month, that odd fifth week is usually when department heads take a vacation(so they don't miss a meeting). Streamlining the meetings to just two a month (one COW, one City Council), would lengthen the meeting preparation cycle and allow us to take more uninterrupted time with each agenda item, and would allow me more time to focus on general operation improvement. Simply, my one week meeting preparation cycle would change to a two week meeting preparation cycle. From an attendance standpoint, I typically attend all four committees, and both City Council meetings. This change would eliminate four meetings per month for me. Department Head attendance Parks and Recreation Director Attends both City Council meetings, and occasionally will attend Public Works or Economic Development Committee. This would eliminate two occasional meetings per month. Park Board has adopted a summer schedule already, making one meeting per month a bills-list only meeting. Park Board packets are prepared by the Director, and typically go out the same day as the City Council meeting packets. The summer months correspond to an increase in event attendance for the Parks and Recreation Director, so a decrease in committee meetings and City Council meetings would be a welcome reprieve. Community Development Director Attends both City Council meetings, Economic Development Committee, and will occasionally attend Public Works or Administration Committee. This would eliminate one meeting, and two occasional meetings. This is on top of the Plan Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals, and Zoning Commission meetings that would not be affected by this ordinance. These meetings have packets that go out simultaneously with the first City Council meeting, EDC, and the second City Council meeting, respectively. In addition, the summer months correspond with a heavy increase in weekly administrative adjudication meetings (due to property maintenance citations), so a decrease in committee meetings and City Council meetings would be a welcome reprieve. Public Works Director Attends both City Council meetings and Public Works. This would eliminate one meeting. Finance Director Attends both City Council meetings and Administration Committee. This would eliminate one meeting. Police Chief Attends both City Council meetings and Public Safety Committee. This would eliminate one meeting. Code Official Attends Economic Development Committee and occasionally Public Works. This would eliminate one occasional meeting. City Engineer Meeting attendances were based into a monthly minimal cost. Ordinance No. 2012- AN ORDINANCE REGARDING CITY COUNCIL PROCEDURES WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non-home-rule municipality created in accordance with Article VII, Section 7 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville first passed a Procedural Ordinance on November 8, 2011 as Ordinance 2011-65; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, in accordance with the Illinois Compiled State Statutes, has the right to determine procedures for organizing and conducting all meetings of the City Council acknowledging that the City is bound by certain state and federal laws as well as legal precedents which cannot be supplanted by City ordinance; and, WHEREAS,in keeping with this right, the City Council has adopted Roberts Rules of Order to outline the procedure to be followed during meetings and to regulate the actions of Council members and the public in attendance at such meetings; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has discussed implementing additional procedures to supplement Roberts Rules of Order regarding City Council meetings and the four standing committees of the City Council—Administration, Economic Development, Public Safety and Public Works. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Procedures for City Council Meetings: a. During the months of September through Mgy City Council Meetings shall be regularly scheduled to convene on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month-at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. For the months of June, July, and Ordinance No.2012- Page 1 August, City Council Meetings shall be regularly scheduled to convene on the 4`n Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. b. City Couneil Meetings shall be generally conducted aceording to the agenda template attached hereto (most recent template will be .,tt.,..hed) e-b.No application presented during a public hearing shall be voted on during the same City Council meeting in which that public hearing is held. This provision may be waived by a supermajority of the City Council. 4-. .City Council meeting agenda items may be added by the Mayor, consent of four (4) aldermen, or direction from a committee. ed.The Mayor shall preside over City Council meeting as the Chairman,unless the Mayor is unavailable, at which time the Mayor Pro Tern shall preside. Vie. The City Council shall appoint the Mayor Pro Tern at the first City Council meeting each May. The appointment shall occur by calling for open nominations at the meeting, and then a roll call votes on the nominations. Section 2. Procedures for Committee of the Whole Meetings: a. During the months of June, July, and August Committee of the Whole meetings shall be regularly scheduled to convene on the 2"d Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. b. Committee of the Whole agenda items may be added by the Mayor or any alderman. c. Each section of the Committee of the Whole meeting shall be presided over by the respective Committee's Chairman, or in the absence of the chairman, by the vice-chairman.° "m shall ° ide ^ er- Qemmnftee-of the :ne Mayor-Pro Tem shall or-eside. d. The intent of the Committee of the Whole is that each agenda item is discussed by the City Council as a whole, prior to its movement onto a subsequent City Council meeting (as directed by the Mayor or any four aldermen). Section 3. Procedures for Committee Meetings: a. During the months of September through May, Committee meetings shall be regularly.. held monthly, at the dates, times and locations as approved by the Committees. gib.The Mayor shall be a non-voting member of all standing committees. b c.The Mayor shall select committee rosters at the first City Council meeting in May following a municipal consolidated election (i.e. every two years). Ordinance No.2012- Page 2 mod.Committee rosters may be switched by mutual, unanimous consent of the aldermen trading seats and the Mayor. d.e.The Mayor shall select committee chairmen and vice-chairmen. e:£ Any alderman may add any agenda item to any committee agenda. &Chairmen shall select liaisons to other organizations and boards by any means they deem necessary, provided that the other organizations by-laws may govern the selection of the liaison. g.h. The four committees shall be: i. Administration ii. Economic Development iii. Public Safety iv. Public Works h-.i_Each committee shall be presided over by its chairman, or in the absence of the chairman, the vice-chairman. tj_Committee meetings may be cancelled by the Chairman of the committee if there is a not a quorum of the members present, or there are no agenda items which require action by a committee. j-. When moving items from the committee agenda to a City Council agenda, the committee shall make a recommendation whether that item should be on consent agenda or the committee's report. If on the committee's report, the committee shall make a recommendation whether the item is up for first reading, or is on the City Council agenda for action. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this Day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Ordinance No.2012- Page 3 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this Day of , A.D. 2012. MAYOR Ordinance No.2012- Page 4