Loading...
Committee of the Whole Packet 2012 06-12-12 CI . �� United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST. 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 onow=aaF Kendall LE Committee Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda City Council Chambers 7:00 p.m. Tuesday,June 12, 2012 Citizen Comments: Minutes for Approval: 1) April 3, 2012 Economic Development Committee 2) May 3, 2012 Public Safety Committee 3) May 15, 2012 Public Works Committee 4) May 17, 2012 Administration Committee Economic Development Committee Items: New Business: 1) EDC 2012-19 OSLAD Grant Applications a. Riverfront Park Development Grant b. Land Acquisition Grant 2) PC 2012-01 PUD Ordinance Amendment 3) EDC 2012-20 Ordinance for the Sale of Public Property Old Business: None Public Safety Committee Items: New Business: 1) PS 2012-11 Liquor Code Amendment—Hours of Sale 2) PS 2012-12 Video Gaming Ordinance Old Business: None Public Works Committee Items: New Business: 1) PW 2012-33 Route 34 Letter of Understanding 2) PW 2012-34 Countryside Center Road Maintenance and Snow Plowing Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda June 12, 2012 Page 2 Public Works Committee Items (cont'd): New Business (cont'd): 3) PW 2012-35 MFT Resolution for 2012 Street Maintenance Program 4) PW 2012-36 Parkway Tree Installation—Vendor Proposal Old Business 1) PW 2012-31 LOC/Bond Call Policy Administration Committee Items: New Business: 1) ADM 2012-35 Procedural Ordinance Old Business: 1) ADM 2012-19 Countryside Development Discussion Items Recommended for Consent Agenda: 1) PS 2012-13 Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Adopting Hiring Standards for Part-Time Police Officers 2) ADM 2012-36 Prevailing Wage Ordinance 3) ADM 2012-37 Ordinance Amending City Code regarding Musical Entertainments 4) ADM 2012-38 Monthly Treasurer's Report for May 2012 Informational Items: 1) EDC 2012-21 Building Permit Report for April & May 2012 2) EDC 2012-22 Building Inspection Report Summary for April &May 2012 3) EDC 2012-23 Monthly Property Maintenance Inspection Report 4) EDC 2012-24 Route 47 Update 5) EDC 2012-25 Glen D. Palmer Dam Completion 6) PS 2012-14 Monthly Police Report for March, April, &May 2012 7) PS 2012-10 Weather Warning Siren Update 8) PW 2012-37 Annual MFT Expenditure Statement for General Maintenance 9) PW 2012-38 Traffic Signal Maintenance Refund 10) PW 2012-39 Annual NPDES Permit Report 11) PW 2012-40 Safe Routes to School Update 12) ADM 2012-39 Monthly Budget Report for May 2012 Committee of the Whole Meeting Agenda June 12, 2012 Page 3 Informational Items (cont'd): 13) ADM 2012-40 Monthly Cash Statement for April 2012 14) COW 2012-01 Library Board 2011-2012 Annual Report Executive Session: 1) The purchase or lease of real property for use of the public body. 2) For litigation, when an action against, affecting, or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting. Additional Business: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Tuesday, June 12, 2012 7:00 PM City Hall Council Chambers --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- l. April 3, 2012 Economic Development Committee ❑ Approved ❑ As presented ❑ With corrections 2. May 3, 2012 Public Safety Committee ❑ Approved ❑ As presented ❑ With corrections 3. May 15, 2012 Public Works Committee ❑ Approved ❑ As presented ❑ With corrections 4. May 17, 2012 Administration Committee ❑ Approved ❑ As presented ❑ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTE: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS 1. EDC 2012-19 OSLAD Grant Applications a. Riverfront Park Development Grant ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes b. Land Acquisition Grant ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PC 2012-01 PUD Ordinance Amendment ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2012-20 Ordinance for the Sale of Public Property ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC SAFEY COMMITTEE: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS 1. PS 2012-11 Liquor License Amendment—Hours of Sale ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PS 2012-12 Video Gaming Ordinance ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS 1. PW 2012-33 Route 34 Letter of Understanding ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2012-34 Countryside Center Road Maintenance and Snow Plowing ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2012-35 MFT Resolution for 2012 Street Maintenance Program ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. PW 2012-36 Parkway Tree Installation—Vendor Proposal ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OLD BUSINESS 1. PW 2012-31 LOC/Bond Call Policy ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS 1. ADM 2012-35 Procedural Ordinance ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OLD BUSINESS 1. ADM 2012-19 Countryside Development Discussion ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITEMS RECOMMENDED FOR CONSENT AGENDA: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PS 2012-13 Ordinance Amending City Code Adopting Hiring Standards for Part-Time Police Officers ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. ADM 2012-36 Prevailing Wage Ordinance ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. ADM 2012-37 Ordinance Amending City Code regarding Musical Entertainments ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. ADM 2012-38 Monthly Treasurer's Report for May 2012 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2012-22 Building Permit Report for April & May 2012 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2012-23 Building Inspection Report Summary for April &May 2012 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2012-24 Monthly Property Maintenance Inspection Report ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2012-25 Route 47 Update ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. EDC 2012-26 Glen D. Palmer Dam Completion ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. PS 2012-14 Monthly Police Reports for March, April, & May 2012 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. PS 2012-10 Weather Warning Siren Update ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. PW 2012-37 Annual MFT Expenditure Statement for General Maintenance ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. PW 2012-38 Traffic Signal Maintenance Refund ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. PW 2012-39 Annual NPDES Permit Report ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. PW 2012-40 Safe Routes to School Update ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12. ADM 2012-39 Monthly Budget Report for May 2012 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13. ADM 2012-40 Monthly Cash Statement for April 2012 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14. COW 2012-01 Library Board 2011-2012 Annual Report ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number d J $ •n Legal ❑ Minutes #1 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ -_� City Administrator El Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources E]� wn sw �© Community Development ❑ Police ❑ Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes for Approval—April 3, 2012 Economic Development Committee Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday,April 3, 2012, 7:OOpm City Conference Room In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Marty Munns Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Chris Funkhouser Alderman Diane Teeling Other City Officials Mayor Gary Golinski Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Code Official Pete Ratos Other Guests Lynn Dubajic, YEDC Tom Gilmour Fred DuSell Barb Nelson Ray Wolson George Frost Paul Herman Brian Johnson, Boombah Stuart Oseroff, Site Solution Rick Tollefson, Imperial Investments David Schultz, HR Green Gary Davidson, BJHDP Joe Phillips, D Construction Jason Poppen, HR Green Jason Leslie, Imperial Investments The meeting was called to order by Chairman Marty Munns at 7:00pm. Chairman Munns asked for a motion or recommendation to move New Business Item#3, PC 2012-02 back to Plan Commission since there were no facts or recommendations from that committee. All committee members agreed with moving this item back to the Plan Commission meeting on April 11th for further information. Guest Fred DuSell asked why this item was sent to this committee. The City Attorney and City Administrator will be asked to clarify the reason. Citizens Comments None Minutes for Correction/Approval: March 6, 2012 Minutes approved as presented. New Business 1. EDC 2012-12 Building Permit Report for March 2012 Alderman Funkhouser said he appreciated seeing the BUILD program outlined in the report. Ms. Barksdale-Noble said another permit application had been received and it is for Bristol Bay. Lot availability in Heartland Circle was briefly discussed. 1 2. EDC 2012-13 Building Inspection Report Summary for March 2012 Since inspections are now done in-house, Alderman Funkhouser asked Mr. Ratos to report on his progress. He said he is busy conducting inspections etc, however, there is time enough to assist homeowner who have questions on their projects. While he is not doing JULIE locates, he said there does not seem to be a waiting time for them. 3. PC 2012-02 (Item referred back to Plan Commission for their April 11, 2012 meeting). See above. 4. EDC 2012-14 Municipal Building Impact Fee Ms. Barksdale-Noble reviewed this item and said staff was asked to discuss again this month, the possibility of a further reduction in the building impact fee. The $5,500 fee had been reduced to $1759 per unit. A building permit formerly cost$10,000 and was reduced to $6,400. Alderman Teeling said she asked to have this brought back to committee since it appeared some of the developers got lower rates since their annexation agreements were coming due, however, others without agreements or with locked in fees, could not always get the lower rate. Ms. Barksdale-Noble said most developers had fee locks, however, the timing was different on them. River's Edge had 5-year fee locks while other developers had 10-15 year locks. Builders without any agreements would pay$1,759 per unit. Ms. Teeling asked how many agreements the City has with developers. There are about 40 subdivisions with different trigger dates. She thought the fees should be reduced even more, however, other committee members wanted to keep the present fees. No further discussion or action. 5. EDC 2012-15 Imperial Investments TIF Incentive Agreement An agreement was drafted for reimbursement for improvements made by Imperial Investments in the downtown area. There will be an investment of$2 million with a completion date of December 2013. Reimbursement would come from eligible TIF funds. Ms. Barksdale-Noble said the TIF is for 23 years and will end December 31, 2029. There is currently money in the TIF. Chairman Munns and other committeemen recognized that improvements have already been made in the downtown. Alderman Funkhouser said he was glad to see progress being made and TIF funds being used and Alderman Milschewski noted that the Fox Industrial TIF was also successful. Imperial Investments spokesman Jason Leslie said he had a line-by-line document of the projects and hoped for a positive recommendation from EDC. Mr. Leslie said each agreement is a stand-alone. The committee approved and this item will move to the April 10th City Council meeting. 2 Old Business—none Additional Business -none The meeting adjourned at 7:27pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young 3 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number d J $ •n Legal ❑ Minutes #2 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ -_� City Administrator El Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources E]� wn sw �© Community Development ❑ Police ❑ Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes for Approval—May 3, 2012 Public Safety Committee Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Name Department Agenda Item Notes: RAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PUBLIC SAFETY MEETING Thursday, May 3,2012 6:30pm City Hall Conference Room In Attendance: Chairman Carlo Colosimo Alderman Larry Kot Alderman Rose Spears Alderman Chris Funkhouser Other City Officials in Attendance: Police Chief Rich Hart Deputy Chief Larry Hilt Deputy Chief Don Schwartzkopf Others in Attendance: None The meeting was called to order at 6:30pm by Chairman Colosimo and a quorum was established. Citizen Comments: None Minutes for Correction/Approval: February 2, 2012 The minutes were approved as read on a voice vote. New Business: 1. PS 2012-08 Police Reports for Jan u ary-Febru ary 2012 There was a brief discussion regarding a recent suicide and also attempts and how the press handles these. Alderman Kot asked to receive emails in the event of suicides so he can respond to constituents. Alderman Colosimo said the Chief had notified him and Alderman Gilson since the incident was in their Ward. Chief Hart said he would improve the notifications in the future. The committee also briefly discussed the procedure that would be followed if a homicide occurred. If canine units are needed, Kendall County is called. Alderman Kot said he would like to see a canine unit for Yorkville again and Chief Hart said several officers would be interested. In the past, the dog was donated as well as dog food and services. These monthly reports will move to the Council consent agenda. 1 2. PS 2012-09 Noise Ordinance Revision Chairman Colosimo asked to have this revision placed on the agenda. He said he received calls from residents regarding loud bass at night. Chief Hart addressed the matter and said there is no perfect system for noise detection and that most incidents are neighborhood disputes. He said sometimes the noise meters do not work properly and measuring noise is not easy. He prefers to leave these types of situations to the officer's discretion. If a ticket is written for a noise complaint, the case will be heard in the adjudication process. Alderman Kot said that when the Rt. 47 project begins, there will be construction noise, however, Chief Hart and Alderman Colosimo said ordinances were passed in the early stages of the project agreement to exempt this. It was also noted some of the work will be done at night. Alderman Kot said it will be important to notify residents in advance. Alderman Funkhouser thought it would be beneficial for the police to discuss constructions issues/noise at the department level and to keep this issue on the agenda for next month. The police department will continue to educate the officers about noise complaints and the ordinance. Alderman Funkhouser asked for an update at the end of summer. 3. PS 2012-10 Tornado Siren Update Chief Hart said there have been many hurdles in the siren installation. He cited coordination difficulties with J.U.L.I.E., ComEd and Fulton Technologies. Power hookups are needed and placement sites were also at issue. Deputy Chief Hilt said he was told today that the sirens should be installed within 2 weeks. Chairman Colosimo also noted that the sirens had been approved last September well before the tornado season and now the sirens are still not installed. He told the police staff to send a message to Fulton Technologies that the Public Safety committee is unhappy with the lack of action. In a month if the sirens are not installed, he will discuss with the committee whether or not the contract should be pulled from Fulton. Alderman Kot agreed and added that there had been no past problems with Fulton. This company also performs the maintenance. He said Public Works Director Muse had done a great job in working with the various agencies as well. Alderman Spears said she had received calls regarding the lack of sirens. Alderman Kot requested a siren coverage map at the next Public Safety meeting. He also inquired about the lightning detectors the City uses. There is one at the river and at Circle Center. There is also a portable unit. Regarding the lightning detectors, Chief Hart said he and Laura Schraw had discussed the maintenance and whose responsibility it is. While it is a public safety issue, he said he felt it would be the Parks' responsibility to maintain and fund. It was noted the 2 emergency phone at the river sends an automated message directly to KenCom. The Parks Department has control of this phone. Alderman Kot inquired if land cash funds could be used for lightning detectors. The original funding came from grants according to Chief Hart. The cost of a mounted siren is approximately$4,000 to $5,000 apiece. Alderman Spears suggested that Laura Schraw research grant possibilities. The mobile detector is used at Bridge Park, however, it is not as efficient as the other ones mounted higher. The portables also have battery issues. Alderman Colosimo said the detectors are Park issues, not Public Safety issues. Alderman Funkhouser suggested that since the Parks Department knows the league schedules, they should plan for where the portable sirens are needed. Chief Hart said he will speak with Mayor Golinski and Bart Olson and ask the Park Dept. to pursue this issue following the committee recommendation. This matter will be placed on the agenda under Old Business for the June meeting. Old Business none Additional Business - none There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 7:15pm on a motion by Alderman Spears and second by Alderman Funkhouser. Minutes transcribed by Marlys Young, Minute Taker 3 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number d J $ •n Legal ❑ Minutes #3 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ -_� City Administrator El Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources E]� wn sw �© Community Development ❑ Police ❑ Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes for Approval—May 15, 2012 Public Works Committee Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Page 1 of 7 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PUBLIC WORKS MEETING Tuesday, May 15, 2012 City Conference Room COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Alderman George Gilson Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Diane Teeling Alderman Larry Kot Other City Officials in Attendance: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP, Community Development Director Eric Dhuse, Public Works Director Bart Olson, City Administrator Brad Sanderson, EEI Other Citizens: Tony Scott, Kendall Record The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Alderman George Gilson Citizens Comments: None 110c� `N% Minutes for Correction/Approval: The minutes for March 12, 2012 were approved. For April 17, 2012 there were 2 corrections from Alderman Kot and Alderman Gilson, the changes were made and a copy was sent to Lisa Pickering. The red line corrections for October 18, 2011,November 15, 2011 and January 17, 2012 were all approved. New Business: (below item moved forward in agenda) 1. PW 2012-28 Water Department Reports for February, March and April 2012 There were no questions on reports. Move to consent 2. PW 2012-29 Kendall Marketplace Improvements- Pay Request Mr. Sanderson said consideration pay request for on going work out in Kendall Marketplace for what's going on. Alderman Gilson asked if there are going to be any added cost? Mr. Sanderson responded no, not at this point. Alderman Kot asked if this was going to come back after it has met Mr. Sanderson's approval? Mr. Sanderson said it will come back for a 3rd and final pay request after everything is addressed. Alderman Teeling asked if it has to come back through us for a pay request even if the work has been done. Mr. Sanderson said that's how they have done it in the past. Mr. Olson said because it's a large check. Mr. Sanderson says it keeps everyone up to speed. Page 2 of 7 Move to consent. 3. PW 2012-30 Game Farm Road Update Mr. Sanderson said that at the last meeting there was a request for additional information for Game Farm Road so just to update everyone we are targeting the November 2014 letting and to make the letting date,pre-final plans are due to IDOT no later than July 2014. The current plans are estimated to be 95% complete. The current construction cost estimate is $6.31 Million dollars. There will have to be some updates prior to finalizing the plans; for example along route 47 the state is incorporating some of the improvements into their plans, so we will have to revise some of the planes for Game Farm road. Alderman Gilson asked if there is a update on the appraisals and the acquisition offers from the last meeting? Mr. Sanderson said that he just picked up a packet from HR Green. They are the updated plats, HR Green said that they should have the title searches to me soon. Once I receive the title searches I will look them over and give it to our land acquisition specialist, he will then update us with a new proposal which I can bring back to the June meeting for approval. After that it will be up to the land acquisition specialist to proceed with the land acquisition. Alderman Kot asked how much wider is the road going to be compared to what it is today? Mr. Sanderson said that it will be 3 lane cross section. Right now it is 20-24 feet, it will expand to 36-39 feet. Alderman Kot also asked if the curve is going to be changed? Mr. Olson responded yes, less than slightly. Where Somonauk continues to the west, instead on being an offshoot it is going to be a 90 degree intersection. Mr. Olson added that Game Farm Road was going to be done in 3 construction seasons, so that we could keep the cost down but also we need to stage the High School property so that there is always 1 entrance opened even though there is being construction done on the entire roadway. The construction schedule does take the school year into account. and all the work should be done in the calendar year once it is constructed. Instead of having 2 entrances in and out the high school will go down to having 1 entrance in and out. It will pose some issues, but hopefully when there is the additional turn lane it will get rid of some of the problems for the morning and afternoon. 4. PW 2012-31 LOC/Bond Call Policy Ms. Noble started out by saying that in the past couple of meetings we have discussed our potential bond call policies and about changing it to a systematic approach. Ms. Noble broke the memo down in two parts. The first part of the memo is the educational part that explains what is a performance bond, what it covers, how it's used to secure development and what the difference is between a bond and a letter of credit and how much easier it is to get a letter of credit. The second part is how bond policies are set up through our Subdivision Control Ordinance and where we are now with the existing bond and letters of credit we have in place. Ms. Noble enclosed a spreadsheet that shows approximately 150 letters of credit(LOC) in place for 54 existing development projects in various phases of completion. Ms. Noble said that they did a analysis and what everyone is going to see in a executive session is a more detail analysis of individual Page 3 of 7 letters of credit for individual subdivisions and how we are going to move forward. Alderman Gilson said in order to streamline this conversation he asked everyone to go through all of the procedures. I. Revise Subdivision Control Ordinance to require completion of Subdivision within 4 years of initial construction. After discussing the items below and going back and forth on them Alderman Gilson said in order to streamline this conversation can we go through each one of these and make suggestions so that we can move forward. a. Revise the inconsistency/disconnect between the standard specifications for improvements requirements for acceptance (50%built out or 3-year after the roadway binder course) and roadway construction(no surface course until at least 70% of the adjacent,private improvements are complete but no longer than 3-years after binder course ) with the Subdivision Control Ordinance requirements for completion of all improvements within 2 years from the date of approval of the final plat. Alderman Gilson's response to this was he feels this is taking a huge risk. This is dangerous no matter how many bonds or how many securities we have as this continues to sit we will not have enough securities to do a total replacement or to finish up the subdivisions; with that being said looking at the dollar amount, they are tremendous. There is no security that we have right now that may cover everything if we had to replace all of it today. Alderman Gilson thinks we should not extend this for 4 years. b. Clarify the distinction between "final plan" in section 11-5-1 and "final plan" in section 11-5-5 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance by referencing the "final engineering plan" and "final subdivision plat" respectively. Alderman Gilson was happy with this plan. c. Amend the Subdivision Control Ordinance to provide that "the failure to complete any infrastructure component is a violation of the code if such incomplete component may result in the harm to the system or potential failure of the system. Alderman Gilson was happy with this as well. Thought it was great. d. Extensions may be requested by the Developer and approved by either the City Administrator or City Council upon recommendation by the City Engineer and Public Works Director. Alderman Gilson does oppose to this, he feels that the City Council should be involved with city extension. Alderman Kot also agreed with this. e. Extensions granted for no more than 1 year at a time and require: 1. submittal of a revised construction schedule, 2. updated engineers estimate of probable cost for completion and 3. updated LOC or Bond with revised amounts. Alderman Gilson made a comment that these are good changes and that he is happy with all of the changes. £ Require an application fee for construction extension request. Alderman Gilson said that we need this and that it should be a set fee. Alderman Kot mentioned that there Page 4 of 7 will be staff time and that the tax payers don't need to pay for this. Alderman Milschewski made a comment that until we know that there is a check we don't approve it and until this is determine and they are going to do the job and put the money up front we don't approve it, Alderman Milschewski didn't know if they could do that. Ms. Noble suggested to make it a application fee. Alderman Gilson asked Ms. Noble to make sure that the verbiage is correct and clear on everything, he also asked her to do some research on fees or to come up with what she thinks it should be. Everyone agreed that there should be some kind of fee. g. Enforce the current Subdivision Control regulations for roadways and surface course installed no later than 3 construction years. (There was a correction made on this, it did say "binder course" and Ms. Noble said it should of said "surface course"; also where it said no later than 3 years she added construction years at the end). Alderman Gilson agrees with this, he thinks it should be even tighter, he would like to see the subdivision done in 2 years. Alderman Teeling said that she understands about the problem not having it done, but once it is done, it could cause problems for us because we have to accept it and if they are not done building it out and they are driving down the road with their trucks and if it tears up the road we then have to fix it. Alderman Gilson said if they damage the road with their equipment and we need to put something writing to address this. II. Revise Subdivision Control Ordinance to require "Acknowledgement of Public Improvement Completion Schedule" a. Schedule outlines when the public improvements are to be completed and signed by the City&Developer. Alderman Gilson said that he is happy with this everyone else also agreed. b. Schedule states the City will place as a condition in the Final Plat of Subdivision approval Ordinance or PUD Agreement Ordinance that the development must have all streets, sewers, water mains, street lights, etc...installed in a workmanship like manner within 4 years of initial construction. Alderman Gilson said that he would push for 2 years, but that is just him. There were no remarks made from everyone else. c. Schedule will require the developer provide proof via a title search that all accepted infrastructure is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Alderman Gilson said thank goodness and that we need this in writing. d. Schedule states the developer will maintain the public improvements until they are approved and accepted by the city. Alderman Gilson said he is happy with this as well everyone also agreed. III. Quarterly tracking of letters of Credits and Bonds re: Expiration Dates a. Projects nearing 2 years into construction will receive status inquiry letters from City Engineer and require an updated Public Improvement Completion Schedule. ( This Page 5 of 7 is the revised version, less than 40%built out was removed from this sentence). Ms. Noble will be revising this. Mr. Olson suggested that we just take out all the percentages a-d. Everyone agreed that this will make things easier. b. Projects nearing 3 years into construction will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer with punchlist and require an updated PIC Schedule. ( less than 50%built out was removed from this sentence). Ms. Noble will be revising this. c. Projects nearing 4 years into construction will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer with punchlist, require an updated PIC schedule and formal notification that the project will be in default if an extension is not requested/approved prior to 4 year construction deadline. (Less than 60%built out was removed from this sentence). Ms. Noble is to revise this. d. Projects over 4 years into construction will receive formal notification of default from City Engineer, at the City council direction, indicating that the LOC or Bond is subject to a demand for call within 60 days of date of notice should the developer not seek an extension for completion. (Less than 70%built out was removed from this sentence). Ms. Noble is to revise. IV. Revise Section 11-5-2 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance re: Contingency Requirement and Reduction of Bond Procedures * Increase the contingency requirement from ten percent (10%)to twenty percent (20%) contingency of the required improvements, as estimated by the engineer employed by the subdivider and approved by the city engineer,to assure the satisfactory installation of required improvements. Alderman Gilson said that we need to do this. Ms. Noble said that this is consistent with alot of communities. * Codify the currently practiced reduction and release of letter of credit/bonds procedures as part of the partial or final acceptance process for subdivision improvements. Alderman Gilson said that the reduction process needs to be codify. Alderman Milschewski asked if we are going to update or do a whole new ordinance and incorporate the two resolutions in? Ms. Noble responded, yes. Alderman Milschewski said that she noticed that some of the spreadsheets have expired. Ms. Noble said that they will be going over everything at the executive session and will be going over materials on how we are moving forward on the bonds. Alderman Kot asked if part of our quarterly tracking is it possible to receive these summaries like we receive our water bill? Ms. Noble said yes, you will start receiving summaries, this was the whole idea for the quarterly tracking. Alderman Kot also asked that with all these new rules and things we are tracking, do we have enough staff to stay on top of this? Ms. Noble says she is just doing the tracking by years. Page 6 of 7 Alderman Gilson had a couple of questions on the codifiers. When going through everything Ms. Noble said that alot of this has been cleaned up or some of it taken out and that she will be getting it to Alderman Gilson as soon. This is also to come back to next month's meeting for discussion. He would also like to discuss the extension fees. Old Business: Alderman Kot asked whats going on about the down town parking? Mr. Olson responded that it has been on hold. There was a contract saying we have to have replacement parking at the jail sight by May 2013. IDOT said that they would look into an extension, but we put it on hold, we finished the design on it and told EEI to put a stop on things and that we were looking into other locations. Alderman Kot said that this is something he would like to see on some agenda, to see where we are going on this and to get an update. Alderman Kot also said that if we don't get an extension then this year is going to go by and he thinks we need to have some kind of plan on where we are going to go with this. Mr. Olson said that he will update everyone at the executive session. Alderman Milschewski asked if we can get an update on what's going on with the jail? Is someone working on it or is it just sitting again? Mr. Olson said that the haunted house committee has been doing some projects on it with the money they raised from the haunted house fundraiser. Harold is waiting to see what we are going to do with the parking lot and the building in general. Alderman Milschewski asked if someone can get in touch with him to see if we can get an update on what they are doing. Additional Business: Alderman Teeling said that the businesses at the riverfront asked if we could put it on the agenda to discuss having at least 2 parking spots down by their business for their customers. They love the kayakers,but they park there all day long and there is no parking for the businesses. Mr. Olson said that they will take a look at it. He knew that there was some conversation about having parking spaces dedicated for the businesses, but wanted to make sure that the kayakers had a parking spot. Alderman Teeling said it is effecting their business and that there is no parking for their customers. Why can't the kayakers drop off their stuff and then go and park somewhere else? Mr. Olson is going to look into it. Alderman Milschewski asked Ms. Noble about the tree at 406 Heustis that is bone dead and has branches falling off it. Ms. Noble said that they have fined the guy there and then gave him a 30 day extension to have the tree removed. Alderman Milschewski also asked that she received a phone call from a resident in Hartland circle about her ash trees being tagged? If the city comes to remove them, does she have replace them? Mr. Dhuse said that because they are on city property, then the city will replace them. Alderman Milschewski then asked about the trees down on Clarks, are the trees going to come all the way down? Alderman Milschewski would like a follow up. Is IDOT going Page 7 of 7 to replace any of the trees over there? Mr. Dhuse believes that they are going to come all the way down. Alderman Milschewski asked if there is a way the city can maybe donate some of the trees like they did for the schools for Arbor Day? Alderman Milschewski asked about the sidewalk in front of Circle Center? Mr. Sanderson said that there will be a sidewalk in front of the school. Alderman Gilson asked about the way they are grounding up the stumps? Mr. Sanderson said that they are coming back with the leaf vac and then will put dirt down. Only working with a two man crew. The meeting adjourned at 7:30pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Kimberly Ryan, Minute Taker 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number d J $ •n Legal ❑ Minutes #4 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ -_� City Administrator El Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources E]� wn sw �© Community Development ❑ Police ❑ Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes for Approval—May 17, 2012 Administration Committee Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE MEETING Thursday,May 17, 2012 at 6:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room COMMITTEE MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Chairman Rose Spears Alderman Carlo Colosimo Alderman George Gilson Alderman Marty Munns OTHER CITY OFFICIALS IN ATTENDANCE: Gary Golinski, Mayor Bart Olson, City Administrator Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director Meghan Ostreko, Human Resources Manager Kathleen Field Orr, City Attorney GUESTS: Lisa Peterson,Yorkville Resident Bob Pfister,Veolia Scott Greiter,Veolia The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairman Rose Spears. Citizens Comments: None. Minutes for Correction/Approval: Minutes from the April 19, 2012 were approved. (next items moved forward on agenda) Old Business: ADM-2012-19 Countryside Development Discussion -Mr. Olson said there are not any refinancing schedules to talk about this time, but since the City attorney is present he wanted to open it up for any outstanding questions regarding the agreement. Mr. Olson stated he hopes to have refinancing schedules within a week. Alderman Colosimo said the original agreements square footage requirements the city is willing to be more lax on to get other businesses to come in. Mr. Olson said some development groups have expressed some interest. Mr. Olson said being able to go online and listen to minutes has been a big help. Alderman Gilson asked what the price is that is being asked for the property. Mr. Olson said he doesn't know if they want it to be public or not, but they did set a price and it was right where it should be, so it shouldn't be a problem. Alderman Spears stated residents have been asking about the potholes. Mr. Olson said they are private roads. The city has communicated closing the roads to the property owner and he said he will talk to the property owner again and suggest they close them because they are too dangerous and undrivable. ADM 2012-40 -Employee Manual Revision -Ms. Ostreko stated there were two outstanding issues after the last discussion. Ms. Ostreko stated the first being additional information regarding random testing from the labor attorney. She said under the 4th amendment public employees are protected from unreasonable search and seizures, which municipality conducting random testing falls under that and that being the reason for the city not being able to do that. Ms. Ostreko said the other issue was unused sick leave and the debate whether or not we should also employes to cash out sick leave once they retire. Alderman Colosimo asked about the gifting bans section 2.1.2 he stated it talks about different relatives and the fiance' is included and he stated he doesn't like the fiance'being included and he feels it is ambiguous. Alderman Colosimo said it is worrisome to him. Mr. Olson said he will check on that if it is required by the state ethics act the city will leave it, but if not the city will remove it. Alderman Colosimo said under Section 2.20 Dissemination of Information it talks about the Alderman of Yorkville has the right to request and receive information on all areas of business for the city, but there is no mention of the mayor. Mr. Olson stated under state statute it is an explicit right the Mayor has access to every document the city creates. Mr. Olson said this particular section was created in 2007 as a result as a perceived withholding of information to Alderman. Alderman Colosimo asked about the jury duty section leave. Ms. Ostreko stated that section was changed in the clean copy. New Business: (next item moved forward on agenda) ADM 2012-32 - Solid Waste RFP-Vendor Selection -Mr. Olson said there is a summary memo with a bid schedule and four detailed proposals in their packet and asked if there were any questions. Mr. Olson stated Veolia seems to be the cheapest and the city has an existing operating history that has been good, so that is the city's recommendation. The Committee was in agreement the contract was good. Alderman all stated that the residents have been happy with their service. Mr. Olson said this will go to the June City Council meeting for approval. Lisa Peterson stated she likes the sticker program. The Alderman stated there are some huge disadvantages to the sticker program and they stated most residents like our current program and didn't want any changes. (resume order of agenda) ADM 2012-25 Monthly Budget Report for April 2012 - There were no questions or comments. ADM 2012- 26 Monthly Treasurer's Report for April 2012 - There were no questions or comments. ADM 2012-27 Cash Statement for March 2012 - There were no questions or comments. ADM 2012-28 Quarterly Comp Time Report-Mr. Olson stated this is an informational item. There was a discussion of a couple employees with high hours and how things are calculated. ADM 2012-29 Water Infrastructure Fee Re-authorization-Mr. Fredrickson stated the water infrastructure fee has sunsetted into the fiscal year 2012 and it is the recommendation of staff that we re-institute it. Mr. Fredrickson stated there are two attachments showing the water fund as budgeted which includes the fee and the other attachment showing no fee and the deficits without the fee. Alderman Gilson asked how long is it anticipated the city will have to go on with this fee. Mr. Olson stated that is an economic question. Mr. Olson said 200 permits is the city's benchmark. When the city can get 200 permits, the city could scale it back or remove it completely. Mr. Olson said the city is already half way there and if the trend continues next year, the city could be up around the 100 mark. Mr. Olson said it is possible if things get better, we could be able to remove or decrease this fee. Alderman Munns asked if this is the same fee the residents have been paying all along. Mr. Olson stated yes it is $8.50 and it shows up at $16.50 on the bill. Alderman Gilson said he opposes this fee and he opposed it when it was instituted. Alderman Gilson said he will oppose the sewer fee too. Alderman Gilson said the city can't keep taking fees out of the residents pockets. Mayor Golinski asked Alderman Gilson what ideas he proposes to cover this. Alderman Gilson said maybe other infrastructure fees to developers. Alderman Gilson said the city can't keep throwing these fees to the residents. He stated the city needs to be proactive on changing this. Alderman Colosimo said he agrees with Alderman Gilson,but when you look at the numbers without this fee, how does the water fund sustain itself Alderman Colosimo said developers are not here and if they are not coming in how can we get these fees. Alderman Colosimo said the city has an obligation to the residents to run the water, so if the revenues don't meet the obligations and there are not developers to charge do we stop services, Alderman Gilson said the revenues have not been meeting expenses for sometime now and if year after year the revenues are not meeting expenses, something has to change. Alderman Gilson said he would rather see developers pay for that. Alderman Gilson said the more fees we make the more people will move from Yorkville and the more foreclosures the city will see. Mayor Golinski stated that same statement can be true with developers if the city add fees to them. Alderman Gilson stated that might be true,but he would rather take that risk. Mayor Golinski stated what the city is doing with the build program and the uptrend in housing sparked some interest in Westbury and there are a lot of fees they owe the city and it could be used to offset it. Mayor Golinski stated he would like this fee to be gone too. Mayor Golinski asked can the city state once we hit 180 permits or 200 permits can the fee be removed. Mr. Olson stated that is something the city could look at. The committee had a discussion on how these infrastructure fees can be changed to relieve fees to the residents. There was a discussion on how many permits would be needed to offset the cost. The committee agrees the city needs to look at doing something to get this fee removed. There was discussion about how many of the subdivisions are locked in on a previous permit fee and many of the alderman opposed that when that was put into place. Mayor Golinski asked what other recommendations the committee has to take this money from. Mr. Olson said it would be general fund that has any cash and it barely has any. Alderman Gilson asked how much money was saved on salt. Mr. Olson stated that is in MFT and can't be used for this. Alderman Gilson said maybe some of the surplus can go toward it to bring the fee down for the residents. Mayor Golinski said the entire point on building up a surplus was for the city to be able to do projects like Game Farm Road, which has been put off for years. Alderman Gilson said the city has infrastructure and so many things that need fixed and what is the city doing proactively to change this, so the city is no longer coming up short. Mr. Olson stated the city is trying to lure businesses to town and people to move to the city. He said the infrastructure is built for 100,000 someday and that is how to get the fees to go down. Alderman Gilson stated that works with a good economy,but I don't see that happening for quite sometime. Alderman Gilson stated he wants to discuss what to look at in our budget to lessen the burden on the residents. He stated there has to be line items. Mr. Olson said there are two things the city just put into place, the garbage contract and the electric aggregation both things will save the residents. This item will go to June City Council. ADM 2012-30 Verizon Cell Phone Proposal- Mr. Fredrickson said the city did an analysis between Sprint and Verizon to compare the rates. Verizon is significantly less than Sprint for the smartphone plans. Mr. Fredrickson stated the city is proposing to change our contract to Verizon. Alderman Gilson asked if the city has looked at any other carriers. Mr. Olson stated Verizon won the state bid, so the city can purchase through them, which enables the city not to have to sign a contract to do this. Mr. Olson said there is not an out clause or termination fee. Mr. Olson said that enables the city to change if another carrier is found to be less. Alderman Munns asked if the city changes to smartphones will that increase the equipment costs. Mr. Olson stated it would and each department would have to budget for that, if that is something they think they should be doing. Rich stated he doesn't want all the employees to have smartphones. Mr. Olson said if they have the money in your budget and can rearrange costs to afford it, then go ahead. Alderman Colosimo asked about text messaging issues. Mr. Olson stated city employees email instead of text message. Alderman Spears asked if no contract is signed can the carrier up the fees at anytime. Mr. Olson stated no because the city is under the state for two years. Alderman Gilson asked about the prices and the average monthly bill for smartphones and the committee discussed the different plans and prices. Alderman Gilson stated he doesn't feel it is that great of a deal and suggested that the city look into different carriers and business plans. The committee agreed to have a complete analysis done. Mr. Olson agreed to look into it and get the committee an update. ADM 2012-31 Summer Schedule Bill List-Mr. Olson stated this is an informational item that there will be an increase in automatic debits because of a different schedule. Alderman Gilson asked if this will create any difficulty tracking. Mr. Fredrickson said it will actually be easier. The bills will still be mailed to us and saves time of having to cut manual checks. Alderman Spears said the bill list will then come to us after that payments are already made. Mr. Fredrickson said it will be itemized and still be presented to council so council is aware the charges that are taking place. Alderman Colosimo said it shouldn't be set up to be paid before council approves it. Mr. Fredrickson said actually it is paid prior when it appears on the bills list because it has to be paid by a certain date. Alderman Gilson asked then what is the point of approving a bills list. Mr. Olson said staff has authority to purchase things up to a certain dollar amount. Mr. Olson said the bills list is to itemize what the staff has spent and done and it is a formality. Alderman Gilson said he opposed that he thinks the the committee should approve them before they are paid, but if the city is going to continue to do that, then don't put us through all that work. The Alderman stated they are not worried about debt service that is a bond that council approved. Alderman Colosimo stated he is talking about monthly bills. Mr. Fredrickson said these are items like Coined, Nicor, these are utilities, gasoline etc. Mr. Olson said this is how municipalities are run. Alderman Spears stated sometimes the council pulled things off we didn't approve. Mr. Olson said those things have been rectified. Alderman Munns asked where the city is purchasing their gasoline. Mr. Olson said several places and different places offer different discounts and we encourage them to go to the cheapest place. Alderman Gilson asked how to change or curb spending if the council sees the staff is spending money in ways we don't like. Alderman Gilson asked is there a way to set things up in a way that until the council sees it and approve it, it is not spent. Mr. Olson said anything over$20,000 has to be approved. Alderman Gilson asked if that number can be lower. Mr. Olson said yes that can be looked at, but there are some things that come up day to day the city needs to be able to authorize to be able to operate. Alderman Gilson stated in emergency situations the city needs to look at other options and it could save the city money. ADM 2012-33 Business Registration -Mr. Olson said the survey of surrounding towns are included in the packet and the fees are listed in there. Mr. Olson said some of them are home rule municipalities and some are not. Non home rule cannot require this and if the municipality is home rule it can require it. Mr. Olson said the city is not really allowed to make money on this. Mr. Olson said the city has to decide why the city wants this, for example, for a list of business. Alderman Munns said if the city breaks even, why would the city do this. Alderman Gilson asked if the city had to hire someone. Mr. Olson said probably a part-time person to handle this and some operating costs. Alderman Munns said it breaks even so what is the point. Alderman Colosimo stated the city is not that big and he doesn't like it and what is the city's benefit. Alderman Gilson said if there is not revenue, there is not a benefit besides a list of business. Lisa Peterson asked if the city has the businesses register. Alderman Colosimo said no. Lisa Peterson said even for$25.00 mail the business a form and they register for a year and then there is a list for consumers and it protects them if something goes wrong. Alderman Munns said the city can't enforce anything. Alderman Colosimo said it is work for the city without any benefit. Lisa Peterson asked why would the city have to pay someone part-time to manage it. Alderman Gilson asked why would the city have to hire someone to do that. Mr. Olson said the city simply doesn't have the man hours to handle that between the increase in permits at the front desk, there is not an employee who has time to handle this. Alderman Munns stated there is not a point if the city can't enforce it anyway. Alderman Colosimo stated the residents can go online and find out anything about all corporations. Lisa Peterson stated the city is missing revenue by not registering contractors. She stated the fees don't have to be much, but it is a protection for the homeowners. Lisa stated other cities charge contractors anywhere from $25.00 to $100.00. Alderman Gilson stated those fees are then passed right back to the consumer to pay for that city fee. Lisa stated she likes the measure of protection for the homeowners. Lisa stated the city then has all the information on that contractor.Alderman Colosimo said he disagrees because if we have to hire someone to administer the program, there is not a revenue. Lisa said she doesn't understand why someone has to be hired to handle this - it shouldn't be that complicated. The committee agreed to look into the contractors being registered. The committee agreed not to register businesses. ADM 2012-34 Employee Recognition and Reward Program-Alderman Spears said this topic was discussed in the public safety meeting. Alderman Colosimo stated discussion came up about how to recognize employees that go above and beyond. The committee discussed what the city could do to recognize employees. Mr. Olson said public recognition is a great thing at city council meetings. Alderman Munns stated an annual dinner or plaque would be nice.Alderamin Gilson stated there is a cost involved in dinners. The committee agreed times are hard and dinners could be expensive and Alderman Spears said several employees stated they wouldn't attend a dinner. Mr. Olson said no money needs to be spent to recognize employees. Alderman Colosimo said something does need to be done when someone goes above and beyond. Alderman Gilson said recognize them in front of the community is good enough. Mr. Olson said it is up to the department heads to let us know and the committee agreed it needs to be made known they can nominate someone. The committee agreed that recognition in front of the community, a certificate and a picture in the paper is good at this time. Additional Business: Alderman Spears said she liked Lisa Peterson's suggestion about contractor licenses and thinks committee should bring this item back to the June meeting. Mr. Olson is going to do some research on it. The committee discussed having Yorkville's own list of contractors that are reliable to use. Alderman Gilson asked about YEDC voting stake discussion update. Mr. Olson said he is not sure if it was received favorably or unfavorably. Alderman Munns said we did not attend last time because of a conflict. Alderman Gilson asked this to be addressed with the Mayor and get his opinion and if he doesn't like it and is not going to do it, it needs to come back to committee. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:34 p.m. Minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Godwin Minute Taker Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J •t► Legal ❑❑ EDC—NB #la Finance EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number m Human Resources F1 C�"Sad Community Development El' EDC 2012-19 Parks&Recreation ALE Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: 2012 OSLAD Grant Cycle—Riverfront Park Meeting and Date: COW June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Park Board has recommended submission of Riverfront Park for the 2012 OSLAD Grant cycle. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approve grant submission and DOC-3 Resolution of Authorization and authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute. Submitted by: Laura Schraw Parks & Recreation Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Applications are due by July 1St. A recommendation to proceed with re-applying for Bicentennial Riverfront Park has been given by the Park Board. Staff is seeking approval to proceed with completing the grant application and requesting approval of the DOC-3 Resolution of Authorization as required for the grant submission. c►ry0 Memorandum EST. 1ss6 To: Committee of the Whole Bart Olson, City Administrator OX11 ft co From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks & Recreation °°° °, �4 CC: Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks Date: June 7, 2012 Subject: 2012 OSLAD Grant Cycle Application Summary The 2012 OSLAD Grant Cycle is open for applications which are due by July 1St. As of the date of this memo,we have not yet heard if we have been awarded grant funds for our 2011 Riverfront Park application. The state has reported that they have approximately$10411 million available for the last grant cycle. Park Board has recommended that we re-submit the Riverfront Park application for the 2012 cycle in case our current application submission is not awarded to us. The Park Board unanimously agreed that Riverfront Park is the most needed for the community, especially due to the increase in activity since the Whitewater Course has been completed, as well as it being our strongest application due to the elements included. The OSLAD grant application will be a development and acquisition grant. This will require development of the park to the design submitted for the grant as well as acquisition of land, which will also be developed according to the plan submitted. OSLAD Grant Proiect The elements listed below are either a priority for residents and elected officials, such as the playground replacement, score high on the OSLAD scoring system, such as the fishing pier and canoe access beach, or are a recommended improvement to achieve a safe and user-friendly facility. Brick(repair and re-laying along walkway) $32,000 Brick work&new stairs on existing shelter $15,000 Playground& sitting area $132,000 Fishing Pier $70,000 Lighting extension into east end of park $50,000 Parking Lot (completion of small asphalt lot near building) $5,000 Landscape Restoration $19,000 Shared-Use Trail (1,210 LF) $50,000 Canoe Access Beach $5,000 Small Picnic Shelters relocated to woods $5,000 Memorial Area(benches only) $5,000 Woodland Restoration(tree removal for wood chip path, tree planting) $25,000 Vendor pads and electrical outlets $20,000 Rise-off outdoor shower $10,000 Port-o-let/changing facility shelters $14,000 A/E Design 10%) $45,700 $502,700 A project is more favorable to the IDNR if the local agency is contributing more than 50% of the project costs. To achieve this, the City is estimating that the value of the priority elements is greater than$400,000, however, some elements can be completed by the City with no additional financial outlay. This includes items such as forced labor for brick restoration, playground work, electrical work,parking lot and trail construction, woodland restoration, sewer/water for the outdoor shower, and construction of the port-o-let/changing facility shelters, as well as the architectural and engineering design fees. The A/E Design fees would include time spent designing and preparing specifications and construction documents for the project. All of these items can be completed by current City employees. The added benefit of this is to maximize our reimbursement from the state. If prices come in below our originally submitted estimates and additional funds remain for reimbursement, we can be reimbursed for the forced labor and A/E design fees for City staff time. In other words, there will be no final outlay of funds by the City. The design for this park is attached and has not changed from the previous years' design. Land Contribution (Corlands property) A letter of valuation (attached) is provided for the 29.1 acre parcel located south of Blackberry Creek by Thompson Appraisals from the first grant submission in 2010. The estimated value of that parcel is $378,000 based on a$13,000/acre estimate. It is a natural division in the 90 acre parcel, and a concept plan is attached for development of the park. Development of the park must occur within 3 years of acceptance of the final payment of the OSLAD grant, therefore, conceivably(if we are awarded in 2013,begin construction immediately and receive our final payment in 2015) construction would need to be finished by 2018. The site development plan is attached and includes a trail, trail head and map, and interpretive signage along the path. The site currently exists as a natural tall grass field. If the valuation of the land is further reduced by the time of acquisition as part of this grant, additional land will be donated from the larger 60 acre section(the entire Corlands property is approximately 90 acres total) as necessary. The City will not expend any additional funds on the development of the park by increasing the land donation to meet the value of$378,000. Overall Budget Estimate Last year a question on the cost for improving the entire park to the entire conceptual design (without any grant funding) was asked. Below is a preliminary estimate of all elements and the total cost for these improvements. Kiosk(s) $2,000 Parking lot on east side of building $156,000 Bioswale in parking lot $8,000* Boat ramp/canoe launch $46,000 Application cost for railroad easement $2,950 Brick(repair and re-laying along walkway) $32,000 Performance area/pad $20,000 Changing facilities $1,000** Brick work&new stairs on existing shelter $15,000 Playground& sitting area $132,000 Fishing Pier $70,000 Lighting extension into east end of park $50,000 Parking Lot(completion of asphalt near building) $5,000 Landscape Restoration $19,000 Shared-Use Trail (1,210 LF) $50,000 Canoe Access Beach $5,000 Small Picnic Shelters relocated to woods $5,000 Memorial Area $10,000 Woodland Restoration(tree removal for wood chip path, tree planting) $25,000 Vendor pads and electrical outlets $20,000 Rise-off outdoor shower $10,000 Port-o-let Shelters $14,000 Total $697,950 A/E Design fee (15%)*** $104,692.50 Total estimated project cost: $802,642.50 *Cost does not include forced labor to complete work. **Annual fee. *** Estimated cost of project completion using consultants (if Staff did not do design,plans, meetings, construction monitoring, etc.). \ � - - - - z0Z- - - \ } ) � z � 0 \ \ \ - � # 7 ( \ | / \ \ § ^ 2f ` � z _ } ;; ' _ • \ § k \ ( ` , } ; - § m o � 0 � k } ( | 0 § § ` = m / mmRa © � ) j woo � � � \ ( ( k « m ) § ^ § ! ` ` " ` ` z \ / a � m , \ \ \ . � ; ; § . \ ! § z } }/ \ \\ � ! \ Mz z / \£ _ § 2 Y w \ 0 \\ -z ; z) 2 q ( » ) \ 0 0 o : » \ ) § ( k § 00 ) § § 2 ; ! /[ ` � \/k f §7 k ) / Q5 mo m z mo _ Attachment A-9: Appraiser Qualifications Yorkville, United City of Bicentennial Riverfront Park Development e� OLw,.,,4, 60541 9,f, 8151695-1401 EARL48 ccDSBCGLOBAL.NET 815�G95-14b0 May 25, 2010 Mr. Bart Olson City Administrator 800 Game Farm Rd. Yorkville, 11. 60560 Dear Mr. Olson, I have performed an initial examination of the estimated value for the proposed park site referred to as `Kennedy Road Park`, in the City of Yorkville. This proposed park now contains approximately 90.32 +/- acres of land according to information supplied to this appraiser. After examining the relevant sales data from land sales in the subject area, it appears that an appraisal would reach a conclusion that the total estimated value of this park site would be approximately $ 1,174,000 or about $ 13,000 per acre (the 29.1 Ac parcel would be about $ 378,000). This value estimate could change depending upon the time the actual appraisal is completed and the potential change in market value conditions. Full narrative appraisals would comply with all applicable standards and be in compliance with USPAP guidelines in place at the time of the full report. The value conclusion reached would be under the assumption that the site would contain the same approximate acreage as of today date and have all public utilities available with the appropriate zoning on the property. Sincerely, David E. Thompson David E. Thompson Thompson Appraisals BLACKBERRY CREEK PROPERTY ACQUISITION PARCEL CONCEPTUAL SITE DESIGN P sill c CORLANDS PROPERTY ST O� 09O I RELAXATION STATION j fi INFILTRATION BASINS i I I TRAIL HEAD AND MAP * t, 1.03 MILE TRAIL BLACKBERRY CREEK INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE r EXISTING BLACKBERRY CREEK TRAIL / (GRANDE RESERVE) I O1 BANK OF AMERICA PROPERTY ��j AUTUMN CREEK PROPERTY / United City of Yorkville YDRKVILLE Yorkville Parks & Recreation Dept. NOT TO SCALE 800 Game Farm Road 201 W. Hydraulic St. Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 CORLANDS AT JUNE 4, 2010 `ro Telephone: 630-553-4350 Telephone: 630-553-4357 BLACKBERRY CREEK GE`V� Fax: 630-553-3436 q Fax: 630-553-4347 DRAWN BY: LAURA SCHRAW NORTH STATE OF ILLINOIS/IDNR DOC-3 RESOLUTION OF AUTHORIZATION OSLAD/LWCF PROJECT APPLICATION 1. Project Sponsor: United City of Yorkville 2. Project Title:Bicentennial Riverfront Park The United City of Yorkville hereby certifies and acknowledges that it has 100%of the funds ticxal pmfea gpm"l necessary(includes cash and value of donated land) to complete the pending OSLAD/LWCF project within the timeframes specified herein for project execution,and that failure to adhere to the specified project timeframe or failure to proceed with the project because of insufficient funds or change in local recreation priorities is sufficient cause for project grant termination which will also result in the ineligibility of the local project sponsor for subsequent Illinois DNR outdoor recreation grant assistance consideration in the next two(2)consecutive grant cycles following project termination. Aciluo5ition and Development Projects It is understood that the project should be completed within the timeframe established in the project agreement and the P inal Billing=reimbursement request will be.suhnrittecl to IDNR as soul[as possible after prgject completion. The Uniled City of Yorkville further acknowledges and certifies that it will comply with all (local pmint 4xxf or) terms,conditions and regulations of l)the Open Space Lands Acquisition and Development(OSLAD)program(17 IL Adm. Code 3025)or federal Land&Water Conservation Fund(LWCF)program(171L Adm.Code 3030),as applicable,2)the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance& Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970(PK 91-646)and/or the Illinois Displaced Persons Relocation Act(3 10 ILLS 40 et.seq.),as applicable,3)the Illinois Human Rights Act(775 1LCS 511-101 et.seq.),4) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,(P.L.83-352),5)the Age Discrimination Act of 1975(P.L.94-135),6)the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1988,(P.L. 100-259)and 7)the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990(PL 101-336);and will maintain the project area in an attractive and safe conditions,keep the facilities open to the general public during reasonable hours consistent with the type of facility,and obtain from the Illinois DNR written approval for any change or conversion of approved outdoor recreation use of the project site prior to initiating such change or conversion;and for property acquired with OSLAD/LWCF assistance,agree to place a covenant restriction on the project property deed at the time of recording that stipulates the property must be used,in perpetuity,for public outdoor recreation purposes in accordance with the OSLAD/LWCF programs and cannot be sold or exchanged, in whole or part,to another party without approval from the Illinois DNR. BE IT FURTHER PROVIDED that the United City of Yorkville certifies to the best of its (1ceal Project.yxm,arl knowledge that the information provided within the attached application is true and correct. This Resolution of Authorization has been duly discussed and adopted by the United City of Yorkville Uaal prgeu gwtw) at a legal meeting held on the 26 day of June 20 12 (Authorized Signature) Mayor ATTESTED BY: (title) City Clerk (title) Rev.3107 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number .'y s► Legal ❑❑ EDC—NB #lb Finance EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number m Human Resources F1 C�"Sad Community Development El' EDC 2012-19 Parks&Recreation ALE Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: 2012 OSLAD Grant Cycle—Acquisition Meeting and Date: COW June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Park Board will be recommending approval of a parcel for acquisition through an OSLAD grant at the June 26th meeting. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Accept Park Board's recommendation to proceed with acquisition grant discussion and application. Submitted by: Laura Schraw Parks & Recreation Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Applications are due by July 1St. Park Board will be discussing a parcel for acquisition at their June 14th meeting to recommend for City Council approval. c►ry0 Memorandum EST. 1ss6 To: Committee of the Whole Bart Olson, City Administrator OX11 ft co From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks & Recreation °°° °, �4 CC: Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks Date: June 7, 2012 Subject: 2012 OSLAD Acquisition Grant Summary Discussion of the OSLAD acquisition grant process, in anticipation for a discussion on specific properties at the June 26th City Council meeting. Background The Land and Water Conservation Fund program was enacted to establish a specific federal funding source to assist federal and state agencies in meeting present and future outdoor recreation needs of the country. The Act provides funds for federal acquisition and development of public outdoor recreation lands and authorizes a 50%reimbursement grant-in-aid program for state outdoor recreation planning, acquisition and development initiatives. Funds for the program are derived from a portion of the revenues generated through off-shore mineral deposit receipts, user fees at designated federal recreation areas, federal tax on motor boat fuels, and net proceeds from the sale of surplus federal real property. The limit of any one project in a given year is $750,000 for approved land acquisition projects. Applications must be for a single site, recreation development initiated within 3 years of the site acquisition and completed within 5 years. The land must be open within a year of purchase and remain open during development at all times for public use. The City is not allowed to pre-negotiate any land price prior to applying for the OSLAD grant, nor prior to receiving award of the grant. At this time, the City is only allowed to inquire as to whether or not properties are available for purchase. The acquisition grant is allowed to be matched with donated land, not land that is required to be donated as part of the land cash ordinance. The property along Kennedy Road currently being held by Corlands will be used as a land match for this grant. The land acquired through the grant can be worth up to $750,000,we can acquire up to $750,000 of the Corlands property to match this, and the state will reimburse up to $750,000 in cash. Ultimately, if the land acquired through the grant is $750,000 or less and is matched with land that Corlands is currently holding for the City, the City will not spend any money to acquire property. On Thursday June 14th the Park Board will be reviewing three potential properties and then recommending one property to the City Council for approval for an OSLAD grant at the June 26th City Council meeting. Grant applications are due by July 1 st. Staff is seeking concurrence from the City Council to proceed with an acquisition grant. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number Legal Finance E] EDC—NB #2 EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number Human Resources ❑ `=Q Community Development F-1 PC 2012-01 Police ALE � Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Proposed Text Amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole/June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Proposed text amendment to the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Ordinance. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum. sir Memorandum 0 a' To: Committee of the Whole EST. ! W- 1836 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director -�� CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: June 5,2012 Subject: PC 2012-01 —Proposed Text Amendment to the Planned Unit Development Kendae t°unTy Lj<kE �. (PUD) Ordinance BackLmound & Request: Since the spring of 2010, staff and the Zoning Commission have held regular monthly meetings devoted to completing a full review of the current zoning ordinance and drafting proposed revisions on a chapter by chapter basis. To date, the Zoning Commission has made comprehensive updates to the structure and content of the zoning code and proposed amendments to the administrative and enforcement aspects to bring it more in line with the actual practices and processes of the City. At the conclusion of the Zoning Commission's review, a final written assessment report will be submitted to the City Council along with a recommendation for adoption of the new zoning ordinance as part of a public hearing process. However, due to the significance and urgency to update certain sections of the zoning ordinance sooner rather than later, staff believes the proposed revisions to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance are ripe for consideration of immediate text amendment approval. Therefore, staff is proposing to amend Title 10, Chapter 13: Planned Unit Development of the Municipal Zoning Ordinance to comprehensively revise the method and procedure in which Planned Unit Development(PUD) applications are considered for approval. The most significant proposed change to this chapter is the reversion back to establishing a Planned Unit Development as a Special Use, rather than a district. This is in conformance with 65 ILCS 5/11-13-1.1 of the Illinois Statutes (see attached). The proposed revision to the Planned Unit Development Ordinance adopted in 2006, reorganizes and streamlines the review/approval process, by removing the requirement for a separate Park Board review of the plan, but rather allows for a Park Board representative as a voting member on the Plan Commission. Further, to coincide with the recent Bond Policy discussions, the revised PUD Ordinance adds provisions to address stalled construction of subdivision developments. Finally, there is also an added provision requiring the approval of a Final Plat for Planned Unit Developments which, although has been the City's practice, does not exist in the current ordinance. Plan Commission Action: The Plan Commission reviewed the requested special use permit at a public hearing held on April 11, 2012 and made the following action: Motion to recommend approval of the request to comprehensively revise the method and procedure in which Planned Unit Development(PUD) applications are considered for approval as proposed in a staff memorandum dated April 3, 2012. Action Item• Lindblom- aye; Winninger-aye; Weaver-aye; Prochaska-aye; Kraupner-aye; Adams-aye; Baker, aye 7 ayes; 0 nays; 0 abstentions Park Board Comments: As mentioned previously, the proposed revisions to the PUD Ordinance focuses on simplifying the review and approval procedures to require the applicant to have public meetings only before the Plan Commission (public hearing) and the City Council as part of the entitlement process. The current review by the Park Board at a separate public hearing is proposed to be removed, but keeps the Park Board input and involvement in planned residential development a viable part of the public hearing process by allowing for a Park Board representative to be a voting member on the Plan Commission. Staff has met with and presented the proposed changes to the Park Board for their feedback. Committee of the Whole Consideration: Staff is looking for feedback, revisions and a recommendation for approval from the Committee of the Whole regard to the requested text amendment to revise the current Planned Unit Development Ordinance. For your reference, staff has attached a copies of the memorandums submitted to the Plan Commission and park Board regarding this request, as well as the minutes from the Park Board meetings. Staff will be present at Tuesday night's meeting to address any questions from the committee. Co.` Memorandum J j To: Plan Commission EST. 1836 From: Kr sti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Y Y p �- CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator m�saaz Date: April 3, 2012 K,,dgC-,Ty ,�?Q Subject: PC 2012-01 -Proposed Text Amendment to the Planned Unit <LE '►�' Development(PUD) Ordinance Note: This item was tabled at the March 14, 2012 Plan Commission meeting. Since that meeting, some typographical errors and other minor revisions have been made to the proposed PUD Ordinance from the copy previously provided related to Section 10-13-8: Final PUD Plat (addition of paragraphs C-G) and Section 10-13-12: Fees (revised language to reflect the City does not have an adopted schedule of fees, but rather various ordinances related to fees and/or deposits for development petitions). Background: Since the spring of 2010, staff and the Zoning Commission has held regular monthly meetings devoted to completing a full review of the current zoning ordinance and drafting proposed revisions on a chapter by chapter basis. To date, the Zoning Commission has made comprehensive updates to the structure and content of the zoning code and proposed amendments to the administrative and enforcement aspects to bring it more in line with the actual practices and processes of the City. Generally, at the conclusion of the Zoning Commission's review, a final written assessment report will be submitted to the City Council along with a recommendation for adoption of the new zoning ordinance as part of a public hearing process. However, due to the significance and urgency to update certain sections of the zoning ordinance sooner rather than later, staff will bring those proposed revised chapters before the Plan Commission for immediate text amendment approval. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance is the first chapter proposed for comprehensive text amendment consideration. Proposed Text Amendment: The City of Yorkville is proposing to amend Title 10, Chapter 13: Planned Unit Development of the Municipal Zoning Ordinance to comprehensively revise the method and procedure in which Planned Unit Development(PUD) applications are considered for approval. The most significant proposed change to this chapter is the reversion back to establishing a Planned Unit Development as a Special Use rather than a district. This is in conformance with 65 ILCS 5/11-13-1.1 of the Illinois Statutes. The proposed revision to the Planned Unit Development Ordinance adopted in 2006, reorganizes and streamlines the review/approval process, as well as adds provisions to address current issues faced with stalled developments in a slow economy. There is also an added provision requiring the approval of a Final Plat for Planned Unit Developments which has been the City's practice, but does not currently exist in the ordinance. Staff Comments & Recommendations: In reviewing and making recommendations for revisions to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance staff consulted with the City's Attorney and City Engineer to ensure compliance with current Illinois zoning laws and Yorkville's Subdivision Control Ordinance. Therefore, it is Staff's recommendation the Plan Commission to recommend approval of the proposed text amendment to the PUD ordinance. A copy of the existing PUD Ordinance and proposed revised PUD Ordinance has been attached for your reference. Proposed Motion: Having Made Findings of Facts and consideration of testimony provided in a Public Hearing on April 11, 2012, the Plan Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request for text amendment to Title 10, Chapter 13: Planned Unit Development of the United City of Yorkville's City Code, as presented by staff in a memorandum dated April 3, 2012 and the attached draft revised title, and further subject to [insert any additional conditions of the Plan Commission]... Attachments: 1. Copy of 65 ILSC 5/11-13-1.1 regarding corporate authority of a municipality to provide for the classification of special uses, including but not limited to planned developments. 2. Current Title 10, Chapter 13: Planned Unit Development of the United City of Yorkville's Municipal Zoning Ordinance. 3. Proposed Revised Title 10, Chapter 13: Planned Unit Development of the United City of Yorkville's Municipal Zoning Ordinance last revised April 3, 2012. 4. Copy of Public Notice. 65 ILCS 51 Illinois Municipal Code. Page 4 of 17 the time of the enactment of such an ordinance. The powers conferred by this Division 13 shall not be exercised so as to deprive the owner of any existing property of its use or maintenance for the purpose to which it is then lawfully devoted, but provisions may be made for the gradual elimination of uses, buildings and structures which are incompatible with the character of the districts in which they are made or located, including, without being limited thereto, provisions (a) for the elimination of such uses of unimproved lands or lot areas when the existing rights of the persons in possession thereof are terminated or when the uses to which they are devoted are discontinued; (b) for the elimination of uses to which such buildings and structures are devoted, if they are adaptable for permitted uses; and (c) for the elimination of such buildings and structures when they are destroyed or damaged in major part, or when they have reached the age fixed by the corporate authorities of the municipality as the normal useful life of such buildings or structures. This amendatory Act of 1971 does not apply to any municipality which is a home rule unit, except as provided in item (12) . (Source: P.A. 96-904, eff. 1-1-11; 97-496, eff. 8-22-11. ) (65 ILCS 5/11-13-1.1) (from Ch. 24, par. 11-13-1.1) Sec. 11-13-1.1. The corporate authorities of any municipality may in its ordinances passed under the authority of this Division 13 provide for the classification of special uses. Such uses may include but are not limited to public and quasi-public uses affected with the public interest, uses which may have a unique, special or unusual impact upon the use or enjoyment of neighboring property, and planned developments. A use may be a permitted use in one or more zoning districts, and a special use in one or more other zoning districts. A special use shall be permitted only after a public hearing before some commission or committee designated by the corporate authorities, with prior notice thereof given in the manner as provided in Section 11-13-6 and 11-13-7 . Any notice required by this Section need not include a metes and bounds legal description of the area classified for special uses, provided that the notice includes: (i) the common street address or addresses and (ii) the property index number ("PIN") or numbers of all the parcels of real property contained in the area classified for special uses. A special use shall be permitted only upon evidence that such use meets standards established for such classification in the ordinances, and the granting of permission therefor may be subject to conditions reasonably necessary to meet such standards. In addition, any proposed special use which fails to receive the approval of the commission or committee designated by the corporate authorities to hold the public hearing shall not be approved by the corporate authorities except by a favorable majority vote of all aldermen, commissioners or trustees of the municipality then holding office; however, the corporate authorities may by ordinance increase the vote requirement to two-thirds of all aldermen, commissioners or trustees of the municipality then holding office. (Source: P.A. 97-336, eff. 8-12-11. ) (65 ILCS 5/11-13-2) (from Ch. 24, par. 11-13-2) http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?DocName=006500050HArt%2E+11+Div%2E... 4/2/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 16 Chapter 13 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 10-13-1 : PURPOSE: The purpose of this chapter is to provide for an alternative zoning procedure for innovative developments that provide value to the community over the conventional zoning district and which is consistent with the comprehensive plan and intent of the zoning ordinance. Planned unit developments (PUD) are intended to encourage the most imaginative and best possible design of building forms and site planning for tracts of land where unitary plans would best adapt to topographic and other natural features of such sites. Under this procedure, well planned residential, industrial, commercial and other types of land use, individually or in combination, may be developed with design flexibility. Planned developments must be environmentally compatible. They should have a more beneficial effect upon the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the city and particularly, in the immediate surroundings, than developments built in conformity with standard district regulations. If building density is increased above densities allowable by the zoning district in which the use would be permitted on a particular portion of a PUD then the amount of open space, retention of existing vegetation, buffer areas, new landscape, public commons, community open space, and parks shall be evaluated for proportionate increase for the remainder of the PUD. The planned unit development district shall generally provide attributes in excess of conventional city zoning, building and >1wad use requirements by (this list being representative and not exhaustiv A. Providing a maximu hjeo ing e nvironments by allowing a variety of housing and building types; B. Demonstrating excellence in environmental design and the mitigation of land use factors or impacts; C. Promoting a more useful pattern of open space and recreation areas incorporated as part of the project and that is compatible with the immediate vicinity; D. Utilizing materials and design of buildings, signs and the site that provide for a unified theme throughout the development; http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 16 E. Providing substantial landscaping with emphasis given to streetscape areas, buffer zones, and the provision of significant landscaping (in terms of size of landscape areas and quantity and quality of landscape materials) within the developed portions of the site; F. Incorporating a consistent architectural theme which is unique to the specific site and surrounding community through the use of materials, signage and design. Generic corporate architecture and big box designs are strongly discouraged but not prohibited. Uses should be designed according to the limitation of the site rather than the removal of the limitations. Specific design details such as roof parapets, architectural details, varying roof heights, pitches and materials and building colors and materials should be addressed; G. Retain, utilize and incorporate historic features on the prof to into the overall project design if physically and economically feasible; and/or H. Provide a consistent signage theme. The use of si a esign°guidelines is required for multiphased projects. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-200 10-13-2: PROCEDURE: Because a PUD is a rezoning, the public Baring and findings of fact shall follow the procedure as outlined within section 10-14-7 of this title as well as those outlined below. In the event of a conflict, these proc ures will control. The approval process includes the following stages: A. Preapplication conference. B. Concept PUD plan and zone map amendment. C. Preliminary PUD plan. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) 10-13-3: DELINEATION ON ZONING MAP: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 16 Approved planned unit developments shall be delineated and designated PUD and by number on the zoning district map. A file, available for inspection by the public, shall be maintained by the zoning officer for each planned development so designated. The file shall contain a record of the approved development plan and all exceptions authorized therein. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) 10-13-4: PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE: A. Purpose: The purpose of the preapplication conference is to provide advice and assistance to the applicant before preparation of the concept plan so that the applicant may receive input on: 1. Whether the proposed planned unit development will b_ in ormity with the comprehensive plan and the goals and the policies .ty rkville. 2. Whether the zoning classification of planned unit de pme is appropriate for the development. B. Procedure: Prior to filing an applicatio r roval of a planned unit development, the petitioner shall be required to contac city administrator or his designee to arrange an informal preapplication meeting wt" it ff and its consultants. The preapplication conickall b eld with staff. At such conference the applicant shall provide information as to the lo ion of the proposed planned unit development, the land use types and approximate area of proposed land uses, a list of any and all exceptions to the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations; and other information necessary to clearly explain the planned unit development. Staff shall review and provide input on the proposal's compatibility with the comprehensive plan and the goals and policies for planning of the city and advise the applicant on the information, documents, exhibits, and drawings on the proposal that should be included in the application to the city for a planned unit development. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) 10-13-5: CONCEPT PUD PLAN AND AMENDMENT OF ZONE CLASSIFICATION TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: A. Purpose: The presentation of the concept plan and requesting an amendment to the zone map is the first step in the planned unit development process. The purpose of the http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 4 of 16 concept plan is to enable the applicant to obtain the recommendations of the city staff, park board (residential developments only) and plan commission and city council approval of concept, density and dwelling unit number prior to spending considerable time and expense in the preparation of detailed preliminary PUD plans. B. Procedure: Not less than thirty (30) days before the next available park board planning meeting or plan commission meeting, the applicant shall file an application with the clerk's office for review of conceptual planned unit development plan. The application shall consist of the following documentation: 1. A completed application form. 2. An aerial photograph exhibit of the property taken within the last two (2) years. The aerial photograph exhibit shall not be less than one inch equals four hundred (1" = 400) scale and shall include the following: a. Name of proposed development. b. Outline of property boundaries. c. Adjacent area within one-fourth (1/4) mile Sirty 3. A zoning plat including a legal descriptio, f o be included in the planned unit development. 4. A written explanation of the g:neral character of the proposed planned unit development that shall includ f ollowg: a. A description of all land uses t>bcluded in such district (including open space) with percentages of each use; b. Projected den s for J residential use; c. A description of th ment standards and design criteria applicable to the proposed planned unit development; d. An outline describing why the property should be developed as a planned unit development; e. Identification of the conventional zoning classification allowing the uses for each land use type included; f. A list of requested exceptions to applicable city ordinances and codes. 5. A conceptual planned unit development map or plan. The plan shall include the following: a. North arrow, scale and date of preparation. b. Name and address of the site planner, engineer or surveyor who prepared the plan. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 5 of 16 c. Name of property owner. d. Name of petitioner/developer. e. Proposed name of the planned unit development. f. Proposed land uses. g. Total acreage and percent of the site devoted to each land use. h. Location of proposed streets. i. Proposed dedication of land for school and park sites, if applicable. j. Land area to be used for open space such as storm water basins, buffers, parks and trail corridors. k. Proposed approximate building footprints and estimat or area for all nonresidential structures, if any. I. Maximum number of residential units. m. Gross and net densities. n. Wetlands, floodplain and floodways o i o ublished data. o. Location of lakes, ponds, stream ainage swales. p. Existing vegetation including s ion o predominant vegetation types and sizes. q. Existing contour lines wi min m of five foot (6) intervals obtained from published data. r. Location of exi ng and/o roposed water, sanitary and storm sewer systems intended to serve the dev pment. s. Proximity to existing proposed transportation corridors and a written statement with regard to transportation impacts due to the PUD. t. Written description of how the existing utilities are planned to be extended to serve the development. u. Any other data reasonably necessary to provide an accurate overview of the proposed development. 6. Other documents may be requested by the city if it is determined necessary to clearly describe the planned unit development. 7. The clerk's office shall have the application reviewed for completeness. If the application is not complete, the applicant will be notified by the clerk's office as to the deficiencies. The application will not be forwarded on for review until the application is complete. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 6 of 16 C. Plan Council Review: Upon receipt of all the required submittals, the clerk's office shall distribute copies of the application and supporting documentation to members of the plan council. The plan council shall review the concept for the planned unit development and supporting documentation and make a recommendation to the plan commission as to the proposal's compatibility with the city's comprehensive plan, transportation plan, recreation master plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision control ordinance, annexation agreement, and other goals and policies for planning the city. D. Park Board Review (If Applicable): The park board shall conduct an informal review of the conceptual planned unit development plan and supporting documentation and provide the applicant with general input on the following: 1. Compatibility of the proposal with the recreation master and park development standards. 2. Layout and organization of the open space system. 3. Compliance with the city's land-cash ordinance r S. 4. Other documentation that the park board w Id m nd be prepared during the preliminary planned unit development pl p e. 5. A formal recommendation by vote ' of n for a conceptual planned unit development plan. E. Plan Commission ReAftnda T e p Ian commission shall conduct at least one public hearing in accordance with Illinois Compiled Statutes. However, the plan commission may continue from time to time the hearing without further notice being published. After the close of the public hearing, the plan commission shall recommend to the city council approval or denial of the zone map amendment to PUD to allow the concept for the planned unit development. The plan commission shall base its recommendation on the development standards in section 10-13-7 of this chapter and based on the following findings: 1. The compatibility of the proposal with the comprehensive plan, transportation plan, zoning ordinance and subdivision control ordinance. 2. The appropriateness of the proposed land uses. 3. The appropriateness of the general layout of open space, streets, parking areas, lots and buildings. 4. Existing uses of property within the general area of the subject property. 5. The zoning classification of property within the general area of the subject property. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 7 of 16 6. The suitability of the subject property to the uses permitted under the existing zoning classification. 7. The trend of development, if any, in the general area of the subject property, including changes, if any, which have taken place since the day the subject property was placed in its present zoning classification. 8. The impact that the PUD will have upon traffic and traffic conditions in the general area of the subject property. F. City Council Review: The committee of the whole shall conduct an informal review of the conceptual planned unit development plan and supporting documentation and provide the applicant with general comments on the following: 1. Compatibility of the proposal with the comprehensive pi , transportation plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance and goals and objectiv f the city. 2. Appropriateness of the proposed land uses. 3. General layout of open space, streets, parking area is a 1buildings. 4. Other documents the city council would rec d e repared for the preliminary planned unit development plan phase. G. Mayor And City Council Decision: 1. The mayor and city councilpon r biving the recommendation of the plan commission, may grant or deny any proposed amendment in accordance with applicable Illinois statutes o ay refer to the plan commission for further consideration. 2. If an application for a proposed amendment is not acted upon finally by the city council within six (6) months of the date upon which such application is received by the mayor and city council, it shall be deemed to have been denied. H. Modifications To Concept Plan For The Planned Unit Development: After the approval of the concept plan and zone map amendment for the planned unit development, the use of land, construction, modification or alteration of any buildings or structures within the planned unit development will be governed by the approved planned unit development, rather than by any other provisions of the zoning ordinance of the city. No changes may be made to the approved concept plan for the planned unit development unless approved by the city. Changes to the planned unit development will be determined by the city administrator, or designee, to be one of the following; a minor change or a major change: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 8 of 16 1. Minor changes to the concept PUD plan are modifications that do not alter the intent of a planned unit development. Minor changes which meet the criteria set forth in this subsection H1 may be approved by the city administrator or designee, if the proposed minor change does not result in the following: a. An increase in gross density. b. A change in mixture of dwelling unit types resulting in a greater than ten percent (10%) change in quantity of any proposed unit type. c. A change in the mixture of land uses resulting in a greater than ten percent (10%) change in area of any proposed use. d. Any reduction of an amount of common open space, landscaping or buffering. e. A change in the functional classification of a roadway. Minor changes not approved by the city administrator may be approved by the city council without review and recommendation by the plan commission, unless the city council refers a request for a minor change to the plan commission for review and recommendation. 2. Major changes are modifications which alter cept or intent of the planned unit development exceeding the criteria set forth uting a minor change. If a major change is requested, the appant s bmit a revised PUD concept plan and supporting data with an applic n fo�major change to the clerk's office and repeat the review procedures s fo in thi3�ection. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) low 10-13-6: PRELIMINARY PUD P A. Purpose: The purpose of the preliminary PUD plan submission is to obtain approval from the city that the plans the applicant intends to prepare and follow are acceptable as a preliminary PUD plan, and that any final plans will be approved provided they substantially conform to the preliminary planned unit development plan. The preliminary PUD plan must be substantially in conformance with the concept plan approved at the time of zone map amendment (if the preliminary PUD plan is not substantially in conformance with the concept plan, it will be deemed a major change and a new concept plan will need to be submitted and approved as prescribed by section 10-13-5 of this chapter). Approval of the preliminary planned unit development shall not constitute authority to proceed with construction of any improvements but rather an approval of the general features of the plans as a basis for preparing the final plans. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 9 of 16 B. Procedure: Not less than forty five (45) days before the plan commission meeting, the applicant shall file an application with the clerk's office for preliminary planned unit development approval. The application shall consist of the following documentation: 1. One copy of the completed preliminary planned unit development form. 2. Disclosure of beneficiaries form. 3. Preliminary planned unit development plan. The plan shall include at a minimum, the following information: a. North arrow, scale (not less than 1 inch equals 200 feet) and date of preparation. b. Name and address of the site planner, engineer or surveyor who prepared the plan. c. Name of property owner. d. Name of developer. e. Proposed name of development. f. Location map. g. Legal description. h. Site data, including, as applicable: (1) Total acreage, and acreage per age of each proposed land use. (2) Percent of land devoted to a nd public rights of way. (3) Number of tneide' ntial (4) Floor area side 1). (5) Gross and al density. (6) Minimum, maximum and average lot sizes. (7) Percent of lot coverage for all uses except detached single-family and duplex. (8) Identify the conventional zoning classification used to define each land use and list variances granted by the concept plan approval, if any. i. Aerial photograph illustrating the subject property and adjacent property within one- fourth (1/4) mile of the site. j. Existing zoning and owners of adjacent property. k. Municipal limits. 1. School district boundaries. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 10 of 16 m. Property lines and dimensions. n. Residential lots with approximate dimensions. o. Location of multi-family and single-family attached buildings. p. Footprints of nonresidential buildings. q. Front, rear, side yard and corner side yard setbacks. r. Off street parking and loading areas, including number and dimensions of parking spaces, drive aisles and loading zones. s. Configuration and acreage of all land proposed as open space including storm water management areas, parks, buffers, and trail corridors. t. All sites to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for pa s, school sites, public buildings, and similar public and quasi-public uses. u. Pedestrian and/or bicycle circulation systems. No v. Existing vegetation. w. Limits of jurisdictional and nonjurisdiction w S. x. Limits of 100-year floodplain. y. Surface water including lakes, p s, streams and drainage swales. z. Existing contour lines with a m u ne foot (1') interval. aa. Any other d on ne sary to provide an accurate overview of the proposed deve ment. 4. Preliminary lands a plan ' icating the name, variety, size, location and quantities of plant material for on and dedicated areas including parkways, buffer areas, storm water basins, wetlands, entry areas, medians, and parking lot islands. 5. Preliminary engineering plan which shall be drawn on a print of the proposed land use plan. The proposed plan shall show an appropriate location and dimensions of all sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and water lines for all proposed land uses, drainage ditches, culverts and storm water retention/detention areas, as well as all utility easements. The plan shall be accompanied by a statement from the sanitary district attesting to the capability of the existing sewer system and wastewater treatment facility to service the proposed development. 6. Photometric plan (for nonresidential developments only). The photometric plan shall be superimposed on the site plan, and shall: a. Identify the location and heights of all light standards. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page I I of 16 b. Identify foot-candle intensities on the site of the planned unit development, and ten feet (10') beyond proposed property lines. c. Include specifications for proposed lighting, including wattage, method of illumination, and color of light standards and luminaries. 7. Architectural drawings. When requested by plan commission or city council, preliminary architectural drawings for all primary buildings and accessory buildings shall be submitted which include: a. Typical elevations (front, rear and side) for proposed residential and nonresidential buildings, which identify materials and color styling proposed for all elements of the building. b. Proposed building heights. c. Roof plan for all nonresidential structures, which sho the proposed location of all roof mounted mechanical equipment. 8. The plan commission or city council may require prepar ' n ubmittal of the following for review and evaluation: a. Fiscal impact study, detailing the estimate h he planned unit development will have on all taxing bodie a revenues which will be realized from each phase of develop t. b. Proposed covenants, conditions r ctions and/or homeowner association bylaws. c. Other information that may be ire `'by the plan commission or city council. C. Plan Council Review: Upon recpt of all the required submittals, the clerk's office shall distribute copies of the application and supporting documentation to members of the plan council. The plan council shall review the preliminary planned unit development and supporting documentation and make a recommendation to the plan commission as to the proposal's concurrency with the approved concept planned unit development plan and compatibility with the city's comprehensive plan, transportation plan, recreation master plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision control ordinance, annexation agreement, and other goals and policies for planning the city. A traffic impact study will be prepared by the city as part of the plan council's review. D. Park Board Review (When Applicable): The park board shall conduct a formal review of the preliminary planned unit development plan and supporting documentation. The park board shall forward its recommendation to the city council. The recommendation may include conditions of approval intended to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 12 of 16 E. Plan Commission Review: The plan commission shall conduct a public hearing in accordance with Illinois Compiled Statutes. After the close of the public hearing, the plan commission shall recommend to the city council approval or denial of the preliminary planned unit development plan. The recommendation may include conditions of approval intended to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. F. City Council Review: Subsequent to receiving the plan commission and park board recommendations, the city council shall conduct a public hearing and shall approve or deny the application for the preliminary planned unit development plan. G. Modifications To Preliminary Plan For The Planned Unit Development: After the approval of the planned unit development, the use of land, construction, modification or alteration of any buildings or structures within the planned unit development will be governed by the approved planned unit development, rather than by any er provisions of the zoning ordinance of the city. No changes may be made to the approved planned deve ment unless approved by the city. Changes to the planned unit developme t be determined by the city administrator, or designee, to be one of the foil iri r change or a major change. 1. Minor changes to the preliminary PUD plan ar' o cations that do not alter the intent of a planned unit developmen Minor cha ges which meet the criteria set forth in this subsection G1 may be approv, y the city administrator or designee, if the proposed minor change does n re in the following: a. An increase in gross de b. Any change in culation pa or access. c. A change in th ixture of dwelling unit types resulting in a greater than five percent (5%) change in ntity of any proposed unit type. d. Any change in grading or utility provisions. e. A change in the mixture of land uses resulting in a greater than five percent (5%) change in area of any proposed use. f. Any reduction of an amount of common open space, landscaping or buffering. g. Any change to exterior elevations of buildings which alter rooflines, building materials, approved color schemes or result in a change in architectural style. h. Other changes of similar scale, proportion or use. Minor changes not approved by the city administrator may be approved by the city council without review and recommendation by the plan commission, unless the city council refers a request for a minor change to the plan commission for review and recommendation. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 13 of 16 2. Major changes to the preliminary PUD plan are modifications which alter the concept or intent of the planned unit development exceeding the criteria set forth constituting a minor change. If a major change is requested, the applicant shall submit a revised PUD preliminary plan and supporting data with an application for a major change to the clerk's office, not less than forty five (45) days before the plan commission meeting. The plan commission shall recommend to the city council approval or denial of the application for a major change. Subsequent to receiving the plan commission and park board (when applicable) recommendations, the city council shall approve or deny the application for the major change. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) 10-13-7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: U The density, minimum lot size and minimum setback dimension for each use proposed within a PUD shall be determined by the conventional zoning classification which would permit the proposed use unless a variance is specifically requested as part of the concept PUD request. Plan commission shall make findings and recommendations to city council for approval of the planned unit development, based upon the following standards: A. General: 1. The uses permitted Bch epti as may be requested or recommended are necessary or desirable and a to to the purpose of the development. 2. The uses perm ked in suc development are not of such nature or so located as to exercise an undue detrimental influence or effect upon the surrounding neighborhood. 3. That all minimum requirements pertaining to commercial, residential, institutional or other uses established in the planned development shall be subject to the requirements for each individual classification as established elsewhere in this title, except as may be specifically varied herein granting and establishing a planned development use. 4. There is no minimum district size required for a PUD. 5. Wherever the applicant proposes to provide and set out, by platting, deed, dedication, restriction or covenant, any land or space separate from single-family or multi-family residential districts to be used for parks, playgrounds, commons, greenways or open areas, the plan commission may consider and recommend to the city council and the city council may vary the applicable minimum requirements of the comprehensive plan, subdivision regulations and the zoning ordinance which may include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 14 of 16 a. Rear yard. b. Side yard. c. Lot area. d. Bulk. e. Intensity of use. f. Street width. g. Sidewalks. h. Public utilities. i. Off street parking. B. Residential: 1. Business uses may be included as part of a p d 'dential development when applicable. 2. Use regulations: a. Uses proposed are consistent ' thos ted as allowable uses in the respective zoning districts. 3. Uses listed as special use the ng district in which the development is located may be allowed. 4. Signs. In accord ce with t regulations set forth in title 8, chapter 11 of this code. 5. The plan commissi commend and the city council may approve access to a dwelling by a driveway pedestrian walk easement. Off street parking facilities for such dwelling shall be located not more than two hundred feet (200') from the dwelling served. The plan commission also may recommend and the city council may approve yards of lesser widths or depths than required for permitted uses in the zoning classification which the planned development is including, provided: a. Those protective covenants are recorded with perpetual access easements and off street parking spaces for use by the residents of the dwellings served. b. That spacing between buildings shall be consistent with the application of recognized site planning principles for securing a unified development and that due consideration is given to the openness normally afforded by intervening streets and alleys. c. The yards for principal buildings along the periphery of the development shall be not less in width or depth than required for permitted uses in the district in which the planned development is included and the plan is developed to afford adequate http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 15 of 16 protection to neighboring properties as recommended by the plan commission and approved by the city council. C. Nonresidential: In a planned business development, the following additional requirements are hereby specified: 1. Residential use may be included as part of a nonresidential planned unit development. 2. All walks within the planned unit development shall be paved with a hard surfaced material meeting the specifications of the city engineer. 3. Any part of the planned development not used for buildings, loading and accessways and walkways shall be landscaped with grass, trees, shrubs and other plant material according to the landscape plan, as recommended by the plan commission and approved by the city council. 4. Permitted business uses shall be prescribed in the ordinan ranting the planned development. 5. The buildings in the planned development sO'al, ned d designed as a unified and single project. 6. Business developments shall be adequafMy n by fencing or landscaping or both along the boundaries of adjacen depublic open space, schools, churches or other similar uses. D. Conditions And Guarante�. to g Ling any special uses, the plan commission may recommend and the city ctunci ipulate such conditions and restrictions upon the establishment, location, constr do , maintenance and operation of the property governed by the sp 'al use. E. Effect Of Denial Of A Special Use: After a public hearing, no application for a special use which has been denied wholly or in part by the city council shall be resubmitted for a period of one year from the date of said order of denial, except on the grounds of substantial new evidence or proof of changed conditions found to be valid by the plan commission and the city council. F. Termination Of Special Use Permit: If work on the proposed development has not begun within twenty four (24) months from the date of the authorization order of the city council, the authorization shall become null and void and all rights hereunder shall lapse. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 16 of 16 10-13-8: FEES: The city council shall establish a schedule of fees, charges and expenses for occupancy permits, appeals, applications and amendments for special use, and other matters pertaining to this chapter. The schedule of fees shall be posted in the clerk's office and may be altered or amended only by the city council. Until all applicable fees, charges and expenses have been paid in full, no action shall be taken on any application or appeal. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23- 2006) 10-13-9: SEVERABILITY: Each section, clause and provision of this chapter shall be co N' ered as sep arable, and the invalidity of one or more shall not have any effect upon the vaother sections, clauses or provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) * 91** 10-13-10: REPEAL OF CONFLICTING O INANCES: Any and all other ordinances or parts of ina S, in conflict herewith are repealed. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) low 10-13-11 : EFFECTIVE DAT This chapter shall be in full force and effect immediately after passage, approval and publication in book form according to law. (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 3/9/2012 CHAPTER 13 Planned Unit Development SECTION: 10-13-1: Purpose and Intent 10-13-2: Authority 10-13-3: Definition and Size Limitations 10-13-4: Procedures for Establishment 10-13-5: Pre-Application Conference 10-13-6: Concept PUD Plan Review 10-13-7: Preliminary PUD Plat 10-13-8: Final PUD Plat 10-13-9: Amendments or Minor Revisions to PUD 10-13-10: Conditions for Approval 10-13-11: Development Standards and Design ri a 10-13-12: Fees 10-13-13: Separability 10-13-14: Effective Period of Planned i ment 10-13-15: Effective Date 10-13-1: PURPOSE AND INTEN Planned Unit Developments are e and differ substantially from conventional subdivisions and therefore require administrative proc ing as "Special Uses"under this Title. Planned Unit Developments are a complex type of Special Use, ly consisting of various land uses and design elements, requiring the establishment of more specific procedures, standards and exceptions from the strict application of the zoning district reguJ#tions to guide the recommendations of the Plan Commission and the action of the City Council. The purpose of this chapter, therefore, is to provide for an alternative zoning procedure under which land can be developed or redeveloped with innovation, increased amenities and creative environmental an* rchitectural design than would be possible to achieve under the otherwise standard zoning district regOations while being in general compliance with the planning objectives and intent of the zoning ordinance. Under this procedure, well planned residential, industrial/manufacturing, commercial and other types of land uses, individually or in combination, may be developed with design flexibility allowing for full utilization of the topographical and environmental characteristics of the site. Planned Unit Developments must have an approved development plan which provides for a unified design, contiguity between various elements and be environmentally compatible with the surrounding area. There should be an increased benefit upon the health, safety and general welfare of the public and particularly, in the immediate surroundings,than developments built in conformity with the underlying district regulations. If building density is increased above densities allowable by the zoning district in which the use would be permitted on a particular portion of a PUD;then the amount of open space,retention of existing vegetation, buffer areas, new landscape, public commons, community open space, and parks shall be evaluated for proportionate increase for the remainder of the PUD. The Planned Unit Development is not intended to be a mechanism solely used for the allowance of 1 increased densities or as a means of circumventing the bulk regulations or zoning standards under this Title, rather a Planned Unit Development shall generally provide attributes in excess of conventional city zoning, building and other land use requirements such as,but not limited to the following: A. Providing a maximum choice of the overall living environment through a variety of type, design and layout of residential structures, commercial and industrial buildings, office and research uses and public facilities; B.Demonstrating excellence in environmental design and the mitigation of land use factors or impacts; C.Promoting a more useful pattern of dedicated open space and recreation areas incorporated as part of the development plan and that is compatible with the immediate vicinity; D. Provide public access and pedestrian connectivity via bicycle/recreational paths, sidewalks and/or alternative modes of transportation. E. Providing and or preserving substantial landscaping with emphasis given to streetscape areas, buffer zones, and the provision of significant landscaping(in terms of size of landscap reas and quantity and quality of landscape materials)within the developed portions of the site; F. Incorporating a consistent architectural theme which is uniqu to e ecific site and surrounding community through the use of building materials, signage and w md' standards as well as design elements. Generic corporate architecture and big box desig strongly discouraged but not prohibited.Uses should be designed according to the limitation o e site rather than the removal of the limitations. Specific design details such as roof Qlshts',,arch' ctural details, varying roof heights, pitches and materials and building colors and mat d be addressed; G. Retain, utilize and incorporate historic f e ect site into the overall project design, if physically and economically feasible;an H. Promote and strengthen the econ 'c vi ' enhance the aesthetic qualities of unified large-scale commercial developments. I. Encourage high-qua r y p ne ' dustrial park environments and well-designed business centers for single or multiple-tenant ilities. J. Provide/enhance regi ublic infrastructure such as roadways, water/sanitary service, storm water management objectives. 10-13-2: AUTHORITY: A. The Plan Commission shall review and recommend approval, approval with modification or denial of applications for Planned Unit Developments. The City Council shall have final decision to approve, approve with modification,or deny applications for Planned Unit Developments. B. The procedures set forth in this chapter shall apply to all Planned Unit Developments. C. Planned Unit Developments may be allowed in each of the zoning districts in the United City of Yorkville only as a Special Use as prescribed in Chapter 6: Permitted and Special Uses and approved pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 10-4-9 of this Title. 2 D. Bulk regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance shall not apply to Planned Unit Developments; provided, however, that the Off-Street Parking and Loading regulations set forth in Chapter 18 of this Title shall apply to all Planned Unit Developments. 10-13-3: DEFINITION AND SIZE LIMITATIONS: A Planned Unit Development is a tract of land which is developed as a unit under single ownership or control, which includes two (2) or more principal buildings, and which is at least four (4) acres in area, except for planned developments operated by a municipal corporation which shall be at least two(2) acres in area, and Planned Unit Developments in manufacturing districts which shall be at least ten(10) acres in area. All land area within a Planned Unit Development must be contiguous;provided that properties separated by highways, streets, public ways, railroads or other public utility right-of-ways may be deemed contiguous for the purpose of qualifying as a Planned Unit Development. Pursuant to procedures set herein, the establishment of a Planned Unit Development shall be applicable tc the addit f property to an existing Planned Unit Development. 10-13-4: PROCEDURES FOR ESTABLISHMENT: A. Planned Unit Development applications shall be hereinafter provided and shall be accompanied by the required plats and docume i ed ans, drawings and other information as specified in this Title shall be required at the time of the arious phases, meetings and hearings as detailed herein.Each stage shall be reviewed and certified by the Zoning Administrator as being in accordance with the Planned Unit�Wevelopment requirements before proceeding to the next stages. The approval process shall i ude th- following stages: 1. Pre-Application Conferee t ry meeting held with City staff as set forth in do -13-5 of this Chapter. 2. Conce t PUD Plan 1Z view- informal review of overall concept conducted by the City Council to provide constructive feedback to petitioner of plan as set forth in Section 10-13-6 of this Chapter. 3. Preliminar Plat- First,a technical review of detailed plans by various city departments at a Plan Council meeting is held;a public hearing is then conducted by the Plan Commission; and final determination is made by the City Council,as set forth in Section 10-13-7 of this Chapter. 4. Final PUD Plat- A public hearing is then conducted by the Plan Commission with final determination made by the City Council,as set forth in Section 10-13-8 of this Chapter. B. The final two (2) stages of the PUD process, Preliminary PUD Plat and Final PUD Plat, may be submitted and reviewed concurrently, as determined by the Plan Council, based upon the following criteria: 3 1.The PUD plan forwards the goals of the city's planning objectives and official plans, including but not limited to, the Integrated Transportation Plan, Downtown Vision Plan, Stormwater Management Plan and various watershed development plans. 2.The PUD plan requires limited variances from the use or bulk regulations of the conventional/underlying zoning district in which it is to be located. 3.The benefit of the PUD plan shall forward or exceed the goals of the stated development standards and regulations of city ordinances, which include but are not limited to, the Subdivision Control Ordinance, Landscape Ordinance, Sign Ordinance, Design Guidelines and Water Conservation Ordinance. 10-13-5: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE: A. Purpose: The purpose of the pre-application conference is to provide information, guidance and assistance to the applicant before preparation of the concept plan so that the applicant may receive informal input on: 1. Whether the proposed Planned Unit Development will be in o the planning and other development goals and the policies of the United City of Yo 2. Whether the existing zoning and land use in the ge a f the Planned Unit Development is appropriate for a Planned Unit Development. B. Procedure: Prior to filing an application for ap ::oval o Planned Unit Development, the petitioner shall be required to contact the city admini�r or his d, ignee to arrange an informal pre-application meeting with city staff and its consulta 1. The pre-application con�lerc x mandatory and shall be held with staff,but is at no charge to the petiti er.At such conference,the applicant shall provide information relating to the f e location of the proposed Planned Unit Development; 'qb' The land use types and approximate area of proposed land uses; A list of any and all exceptions to the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations requested;and d. Other information pertinent to the proposed Planned Unit Development. 2. The pre-application conference shall be an informal communication and discussion of the proposed Planned Unit Development, and no commitments shall be given, nor shall statements or opinions of the city staff and its consultants be deemed binding. 3. Staff shall review and provide input on the proposal's compatibility with the comprehensive plan and the goals and policies for planning of the city and advise the applicant on the information, documents,exhibits,and drawings on the proposal that should be included in the application to the city for a Planned Unit Development. (Ord.2006-40,5-23-2006) 4 10-13-6: CONCEPT PUD PLAN REVIEW: A. Purpose: The presentation of a Concept PUD Plan is optional. The purpose of the Concept PUD Plan is to enable the applicant to obtain the informal feedback from the city staff and City Council regarding the overall project concept, density and dwelling unit or land use type prior to spending considerable time and expense in the preparation of detailed preliminary PUD plans. B. Procedure: Not less than forty-five (45) days before the next available City Council meeting, the applicant shall submit to the City for review the conceptual Planned Unit Development plan. The submittal shall consist of twenty (20) paper copies folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope and two (2) electronic copies of the following documentation: 1. A completed notarized application form,two(2)originals and the remainder photocopies. 2. The application shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3. An aerial photograph exhibit of the property taken within the t t ) years. The aerial photograph exhibit shall be one-inch equals one-hundred(1"= 100) le,b 0 less than one-inch equals four hundred(1"=400)and shall include the followin a.Title or Name of the proposed Planned Unit Develo t. b. Outline of property boundaries. c.Adjacent area within one-fourth(1/4)mile o rope 3. A zoning plat including a legal descr' n of property with total property acreage notated to be included in the Planned Unit Develo in 4. A written explanation of th ral ch cte the proposed Planned Unit Development that shall include the following: a. A descript' of all pos nd uses(including open space)with percentages of each use; b. Projected dens and housing type for each residential use; c. A description of the development standards and design criteria applicable to the proposed Planned Unit Development; d. An outline describing why the property should be developed as a Planned Unit Development; e. Identification of the conventional zoning classification allowing the uses for each land use type included and compatibility to the future land use designation for the property in the City's official Comprehensive Plan; f. Identification of existing uses and zoning of adjacent properties to the Planned Unit Development. g.A list of requested exceptions to applicable city ordinances and codes. 5 5. A written description of general site information that should include, but shall not be limited to, the following,if known or available: a. Existing site conditions. b. Environmental characteristics. c. Availability of community facilities and utilities. d. Existing covenants. 6. A conceptual Planned Unit Development sketch or land plan. The sketch or land plan shall provide sufficient detail to demonstrate the physical relationship between the existing land condition, surrounding land uses and the proposed Planned Unit Development,and shall include the following: a.North arrow(true meridian),scale and date of preparation. b.Name and address of the site planner, or engineer who prepared the an. c.Name of property owner. d.Name of petitioner/developer. e.Proposed name of the Planned Unit Developm f. Location map showing the location of the ed t Development within or proximity to the corporate boundaries. g.Boundary and/or property line o elopment and dimensions of the lots into which the property is proposed to be s ivi 00T, h. Proposed land uses, and total acreag and percent of the site devoted to each land use including minimum and avera e 1 izes and proposed dedication of land for school and park sites, if applicable C. City Council Revie he City Council shall conduct an informal review of the conceptual Planned Unit Development p and supporting documentation and provide the applicant with general comments on the following: 1. Compatibility of the proposal with the transportation plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance and land use planning goals and objectives of the city. 2. Appropriateness of the proposed land uses. 3. General layout of open space, streets,parking areas,lots and buildings. 4. Other information the City Council would recommend be prepared for the preliminary Planned Unit Development plan phase. 10-13-7: PRELIMINARY PUD PLAT: 6 A. Purpose: The purpose of the Preliminary PUD Plat submission is to obtain approval from the City that the plans the applicant intends to prepare and follow are acceptable as a Preliminary PUD Plat,and that any final plans will be approved provided they substantially conform to the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. Approval of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat shall not constitute authority to proceed with construction of any improvements but rather an approval of the general features of the plans as a basis for preparing the final plans. B. Procedure: Not less than forty five (45) days before the Plan Commission meeting, the applicant shall file an application with the Clerk's Office for Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat approval. The applicant shall submit twenty(20) paper copies folded to fit in a 10"x 13" envelope and two (2) electronic copies of the following documentation: 1.A completed notarized application form,two(2)originals and the remainder photocopies. 2. The application shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fees. 3. Disclosure of beneficiaries form and statement of present and pro idownership of all land within the development. 4. An aerial photograph exhibit of the property taken within.th`elast o ears of the adjacent area within one-fourth (1/4) mile of property. The aerial, if exhibit shall be one-inch equals one-hundred(1"= 100)scale,but no less than one-inch equals four hundred(1"=400). 5. Written explanation of the character of the Planned Unit lopment and the reasons why it has been planned to vary from the conventional Wining Ordina a regulations. This explanation shall detail how the proposed Planned Unit D �elopm=, t meets the objectives of all official plans which affect the subject property. 6. Preliminary Planned Unit Develop t Plat he plat shall be a detailed plan which includes at a minimum,the following inforcn�ion. a. Title notation stating"Prelimin' Pla or"Preliminary Plan". b. North qress le less than 1 inch equals 100 feet)and date of preparation. c. Name of the site planner,engineer or surveyor who prepared the plan. d. Name oy owner. e. Name of petitioner/developer. f. Proposed name of the Planned Unit Development or subdivision name, which shall not duplicate the name of any plat previously recorded in Kendall County. g. Location map showing the general area of the Planned Unit Development within or proximity to the corporate boundaries. h. Legal description prepared by a registered land surveyor. i. Boundary lines—bearings and distances. 7 j. Site data,including,as applicable: 1) Current zoning classification. 2) Total area of property in square feet and acreage, and percentage of each proposed land use. 3) Square footage and percent of site coverage with buildings. 4) Square footage and percent of site coverage with impervious surfaces. 5) Square footage and percent of site covered dedicated to common open space such as storm water management systems, landscaping and buffers, parks, trail corridors and recreational areas. 6) Total number of off-street parking and loading space rov and method used to calculate the number of required spaces for each 1 7) Total number of buildings. 8) Total number of residential dwbn e, and the number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit type. 9) Gross Floor Area for all n ilding s/uses. 10) Gross and net densities the erall Planned Unit Development and for each land use. R enti ity: Provide information on the density of residential uses, clu dwelling units per acre, dwelling units per net acre; gross and net residential density (dwelling units per acre of land devoted to residential sectors of the PUD; gross being all land, net being gross acres minus land used for public or common usage). Information should also be provided for each unit in the Planned Unit Development,if applicable. b. Non-Residential Intensity: Provide information on the type and amount of non-residential uses including building locations, sizes, floor area ratio, building height,the amount and location of common open space. 11) Minimum,maximum and average lot sizes. 12) Percent of lot coverage for all uses except detached single-family and duplex. k. Depiction of Lots: 8 a. Residential lots shall depict approximate lot dimensions;building footprints for all multi- family and single-family attached structures; and dimensioned required yard setbacks. b. Non-residential lots shall depict building footprints and dimensioned setbacks. Information regarding purpose/use and height of non-residential buildings shall also be provided. 1. Existing zoning and land use of adjacent property within five hundred feet(500') of all sides of the site. m. Other conditions of adjoining land — owners of un-platted land; subdivision plat name, recording date and number of adjoining platted land; actual direction and gradient of ground slope, including any embankments or retaining walls; character and location of ma' buildings, railroads, power lines and towers. n. Municipal limits. o. School district boundaries. p. Existing easements—location,width and purpose. q. Location of existing streets in, and adjacent , t e property including: street name, right-of-way width,existing and proposed center lines, ave nt ty e,walks,trails,curbs,gutters,culverts,etc. r. Proposed public improvements such'as' ighw and other major improvements planned by public authorities for future constructi ` on or near th property. s. Existing utilities on, an lac o e property including: location, size and invert elevation of sanitary and st s , ers, cation and size of water mains; location of gas lines, fire hydrants, electric and'telephone lines (a ove and below ground) and street lights; direction and distance to, and size of neare ater mains and sewers adjacent to the property showing invert elevations. t. Ground elevations on the property and on the first fifty feet(50') of all adjacent parcels showing a minimum of one foot(1')contours for land which slopes less than one-half percent(1/2%) along with all breaks in grades, and all drainage channels or swales, and at selected points not more than one hundred feet (100') apart in all directions; for land that slopes more than one-half percent (1/2%) showing a minimum of two foot (2') contours. Any land within the one hundred (100) year floodplain,as determined by the City Engineer or an outside consultant,shall also be shown. u. Subsurface conditions on the property shall be shown, if deemed required by the City Engineer or an outside consultant. This includes the location and results of tests made to subsurface soil, rock and 9 groundwater conditions,depth to groundwater,unless test pits are dry at a depth of fifteen feet(15'); location and results of a soil percolation test if individual sewage disposal systems are proposed. v. Water courses, marshes, rock outcrop, wooded areas, existing vegetation, isolated trees four inches (4")or more in diameter at breast height,existing structures and other significant features. w. Location of all proposed off-street parking and loading areas, including dimensions of parking spaces,drive aisles and loading zones. x. Configuration of all land proposed as open space including storm water management areas, parks, buffers,and trail corridors. y. All sites to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for parks, school sites,public buildings, and similar public and quasi-public uses. z. Pedestrian and/or bicycle circulation systems. aa.Limits of jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetlands. bb.Any other data reasonably necessary to provide an acc ov `iew the proposed development. IL 7. Preliminary landscape plan indicating the name, rtety, siz ation and quantities of plant material for all common and dedicated areas including kways, buffer areas, storm water basins, wetlands, entry areas,medians, and parking lot islaa ds. landscape plan shall also depict permanent signs and street fixtures,and a detail plan of landsc'ping for a typical building area. 8. Preliminary engineering plan shal e dr on a print of the proposed land use plan. The 4111 proposed plan qJ1 a nap priate loca tion and dimensions of all sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and for a roposed land uses, drainage ditches, culverts and storm water retention/detents well as all utility easements,and be accompanied with: a.A feasibility report or statement from the sanitary district attesting to the capability of the existing sewer system and wastewater treatment facility to service the proposed development. b.Preliminary stormwater report. c.Preliminary mass grading plan. d.Traffic analysis or study, prepared by a transportation engineer or planner, which analyzes the impact caused by the Planned Unit Development on the street and highway systems. 9. Architectural drawings. Preliminary architectural drawings for all primary buildings and accessory buildings shall be submitted which include: 10 a. Typical elevations (front,rear and side)for proposed residential and nonresidential buildings,which identify materials and color styling proposed for all elements of the building. b.Proposed building heights. c. Roof plan for all nonresidential structures, which shows the proposed location of all roof mounted mechanical equipment. 10. Development Plan Schedule indicating: a. Stages in which the project will be built, with emphasis on area, density, use of public facilities, and open space to be developed with each stage. b. Each stage as a separate unit. The unit shall be described and mapped on the project. Overall design of each unit shall be shown on the plan and through supporting graphic materials. c. Dates for beginning and completion of each stage. 11. The Plan Commission or City Council may require preparation and subm' , a petitioner's expense, of the following for review and evaluation: a.Fiscal impact study,detailing the estimated cost which the it Development will have on all taxing bodies, and anticipated revenues to such tax*b`, S w h will be realized from each phase of development. Information shall include detailed estimates'on: 1) Expected population of the develop 2) Impact on service and/or ope t incurred by each taxing body as a result of the development; 3) Any major capital ' est s ired, in part or in whole, by each taxing body due to the developme b.Proposed c q nditi and restrictions and/or homeowner association bylaws. c. Environmens or study, prepared by an environmental specialist, which analyzes the major impacnned Unit Development may have on the environment including, but not limited to,the effects on discrete ecosystems, deteriorated air quality in the immediate vicinity and along arterial and collector roadways leading to the Planned Unit Development from a specified distance determined by the City Engineer or consultant; any deterioration in the groundwater or surface water quality; effect on sensitive land areas such as floodplains, wetlands, forests, aquifer recharge areas,historic buildings or structures,prairie landscapes,and mineral resource reserves. d. Market study indicating the extent of market demand for the uses proposed in the Planned Unit Development including an analysis of demographics, sales potentials, competitive alignment, an assessment of the market share or opportunity gaps, and marketing positioning of each component of the Planned Unit Development. C. Plan Council Review: Upon receipt of all the required submittals, the clerk's office shall distribute copies of the application and supporting documentation to members of the Plan Council. The Plan Council shall review the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation 11 and make a recommendation to the Plan Commission as to the proposal's compatibility with the city's planning objectives, transportation plan,recreation master plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision control ordinance,annexation agreement,and other goals and policies for developing the city. D. Plan Commission Review: The Plan Commission shall conduct a public hearing in accordance with Illinois Compiled Statutes. After the close of the public hearing, the Plan Commission shall recommend to the City Council approval or denial of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. The recommendation may include conditions of approval intended to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. E. Park Board Representative: When applicable for the Park Board's review of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation, the Park Board shall have a representative present at the Plan Commission public hearing meeting for input and recommendation to the City Council. The recommendations may include conditions of approval intended to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. 1) Park Board Representative's Purview (If Applicable): The Park Board Representative shall consider the following standards when considering the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation: a.Compatibility of the proposal with the recreati m p an and park development standards. b.Layout and organization of the open space s c.Compliance with the city's land-cash arks. F. City Council Review: Subsequent t e i ing c e Plan Commission and Park Board recommendations, the City Council sbaft conduct a public meeting and shall approve or deny the application for the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. 10-13-8: FINAL , D PLA� A. Purpose: A Fin, l,t for the Planned Unit Development, suitable for recording with the Kendall County Recorder of Deeds, shall be prepared by the petitioner for consideration and approval by the city. The purpose of the Final PUD Plat submission is to designate and depict with particularity the land subdivided into lots, whether conventional or otherwise, common open space and building areas. The Final Plat shall also designate and limit the specific internal uses of buildings, structures, and uses of land, as well as provide any additional information or details required by the City Council when approving the Final PUD Plat. B. Procedure: Not less than forty five (45) days before the Plan Commission meeting, the applicant shall file an application with the Clerk's Office for Final Planned Unit Development Plat approval. The applicant shall submit twenty (20) paper copies folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope and two (2) electronic copies of the following documentation: 1. A completed notarized application form,two(2)originals and the remainder photocopies. 2. The application shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fees. 12 3. Final Planned Unit Development Plat. The plat shall be a detailed plan which includes, at a minimum,the following information: a) An accurate legal description of the entire area under the immediate development within the Planned Unit Development. b) A subdivision plat of all subdivided lands in the same form and meeting all the requirements of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance and Municipal Code. c) An accurate legal description of each separate unsubdivided use area, including common open space. d) Designation of exact location of all buildings to be constructed, and a designation of the specific internal uses to which each building shall be put,including construction details. e) Illustrate center line elevations, pavement type, curbs, gutters, culverts, etc., and a proposed street numbering designation shall also be furnished for each building. f) Construction plans detailing the design, construction or installation of site amenities; including buildings, landscaping, storm water detent n facilities and other site improvements. g) Certificates, seals, and signatures required for the dedicatio d and recording of the document. h) Tabulations on each separate unsubdivid e a luding land area, number of buildings,and number of dwelling units p i) Construction schedule—A final constructi s le indicating: i. Stages in which the project will be 'It, with emphasis on area, density, use of public facilities,and spa)e, be developed with each stage. ii. Each stage as a sep e unit shall be described and mapped on the project. Overall design of ea un all be shown on the plan and through supporting graphic materia iii. tes.for beginning and completion of each stage. 4. Common S e Documents: All common open space, at the discretion of the City Council, shall be: a) Con ed to a city or public corporation, or conveyed to a not-for-profit corporation or entity established for the purpose of benefitting the owners and residents of the Planned Unit Development or adjoining property owners of any one or more of them. All lands conveyed hereunder shall be subject to the right of the grantee or grantees to enforce maintenance and improvement of the common open space;or b) Guaranteed by a restrictive covenant describing the open space and its maintenance and improvement, running with the land for the benefit of residents of the Planned Unit Development or adjoining property owners and/or both. c) Such documents shall also provide that the city shall have the right, but not the obligation, to perform necessary maintenance of the common open space, and shall have the authority to place a lien against the individually-owned property in the Planned Unit Development for the costs thereof. 13 5. Public and Quasi-Public Facilities — Guarantee of Performance: All public and quasi-public facilities and improvements made necessary as a result of the Planned Unit Development, including but not limited to,parks, schools,recreational areas,etc., shall guarantee the completion of such, as set forth in the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance, except where varied by the approved Final Plat. 6. Final covenants,conditions and restrictions and/or homeowner association bylaws. 7. Delinquent Taxes — A certificate shall be furnished from the County Tax Collector that no delinquent taxes exist and that all special assessments constituting a lien on the whole,or any part, of the property of the Planned Unit Development have been paid. C. Plan Council Review: Upon receipt of all the required submittals, the clerk's office shall distribute copies of the application and supporting documentation to members of the Plan Council. The Plan Council shall review the Final Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation and make a recommendation to the Plan Commission as to the proposal's compatibility with the city's planning objectives, transportation plan, recreation master plan, zoning durance, subdivision control ordinance,annexation agreement,and other goals and policies for develo the city. D. Plan Commission Review: The Plan Commission shall conduct a pub tc hear in accordance with Illinois Compiled Statutes. After the close of the public hearing, the P, n Commission shall recommend to the City Council approval or denial of the Final Planned Unit Development Plat. The recommendation may include conditions of approval intended to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. F. Park Board Representative: When applicable fCePark o s review of the Final Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentatio Board shall have a representative present at the Plan Commission public hearing meeting fd recommendation to the City Council. The recommendations may include conditions tided to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. 1) Park Board Representative's Purview (i Applicable): The Park Board Representative shall consider the following standards when considering the Final Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting doc enta a.C atibil of proposal with the recreation master plan and park development Stan b.Layout organization of the open space system. c.Compliance with the city's land-cash ordinance for parks. G. City Council Review: Subsequent to receiving the Plan Commission and Park Board recommendations, the City Council shall conduct a public meeting and shall approve or deny the application for the Final Planned Unit Development Plat. 10-13-9: AMENDMENTS OR MINOR REVISIONS TO PUD: After the approval of the Final Planned Unit Development Plat, the use of land, construction, location of buildings and structures in the Planned Unit Development shall be developed in accordance with such approved plans,rather than by any other provisions of the zoning ordinance. Any changes,modifications or 14 alterations to the approved Final Planned Unit Development Plat shall be considered either a minor or a major modification. 1. No changes may be made to the approved Final Planned Unit Development Plat unless approved by the city. The nature of the requested change, either minor or major, to the Planned Unit Development will be determined by the City Administrator,or designee,as follows: A. Minor Changes: Minor changes to the Final PUD Plat are modifications or revisions that do not alter the overall intent of the PUD. Minor changes may be approved by the City Administrator, or designee if the proposed modification does not result in any of the following: i. An increase or decrease in overall density greater than five percent(5%). ii. An increase or decrease in the mixture of residential dwelling unit types greater than five percent(5%). iii. An increase or decrease in area for any land use or Ian se mixture greater than five percent(5%). iv. An increase or decrease in total number of parin es ter than five percent v. Any reduction in area of common open space, buffering, particularly when reduced below the minimum standar bed in Section 10-13-11: Development Standards and Design Criteria vi. Any significant changes in building layout,orieentation or height of buildings. vii. A change in the functional classif catioj a roadway. Minor changes not approved by ' ity dtrator may be appealed by the applicant or property owner to the City#uncil without review and recommendation by the Plan Commission or Park Board Rep esentatiye (when applicable), unless the City Council refers the request for a minor ange to the Plan Commission or Park Board Representative (when applicable)for review recommendation. B. Major C changes to the Final PUD Plat are modifications which alter the concept or inte of th proved PUD exceeding the criteria set forth constituting a minor change. Maj anges to the Final PUD Plat shall be subject to review and recommendation by the Plan mmission and Park Board Representative(when applicable)with final approval or denial det ' ed by the City Council. C. Application for PUD Modification or Changes: For any modifications or changes resulting in an amendment to an approved Final PUD Plat, the applicant shall submit a revised plat and supporting data with an application for a major or minor change to the Clerk's Office in accordance with the following: i. The title of the plat shall indicate the nature of the change. ii. If a major change, the revised plat and supporting data with an application shall be submitted to the Clerk's Office not less than forty five (45) days before the Plan Commission meeting. D. Notice for Major Changes to PUD Plat: The notice for a major change to an approved Final PUD Plat shall conform to the requirements of Section 10-4-10: Amendments of this Title. 15 E. All approved major or minor changes to an approved Final PUD Plat shall be recorded with the County and shall be binding on the applicants, their successors, grantees and assigns and shall govern the development of the PUD,as set forth therein. 10-13-10: CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: The Plan Commission may recommend approval of a Special Use for Planned Unit Development or amendments to the Preliminary or Final Planned Unit Development Plat for the proposed development or amendment upon considering the following: 1. In what respect does the design of the Planned Unit Development meet the requirements and design standards of the development standards and design criteria, 2. The extent to which the proposed plan deviates and/or requires waivers of the bulk regulations in the zoning ordinance and how the modifications in design standar om the subdivision control regulations fulfill the intent of those regulations. 3. The extent of public benefit produced by the Planned Unit Development, as but not limited to, the adequacy of common open space and/or public recr oval facilit'; s provided; sufficient control over vehicular traffic; provision of public servi s; rovision and protection of the reasonable enjoyment of the land. 4. The relationship and compatibility,beneficial or a rs a armed Unit Development to the adjacent properties and nearby land uses. 5. The extent to which the Planned Unit Dev pme 1 s the objectives of the future planning objectives or other planning policies of the 6. The Plan Commission finds that t lanne nit Development satisfactorily meets the standards for Special Use as defined in Section -4-9 this Title. 10-13-11: DEVELOPM&sec ARDS AND DESIGN CRITERIA: A. Purpose: The ose n is to establish and provide a comprehensive set of standards and guidelines in wh P nned Unit Developments are designed. While specific recommendations for development and design are provided, flexibility is also encouraged through guidelines which enable individual developments to be distinct from one another while maintaining the inherent character of the city. B. Applicability: These standards and established criteria shall apply to all newly constructed buildings and sites within a Planned Unit Development. Each proposed development will be evaluated on its compliance with the established regulations/guidelines contained herein. C. Density: The density,minimum lot size and minimum setback dimension for each use proposed within a PUD shall be determined by the conventional zoning classification which would permit the proposed use unless a variance is specifically requested as part of the Special Use request. D. Use Regulations: Planned Unit Developments may be comprised of a single-type of land use or a mixture of land uses when applicable and when different intensity of land uses are appropriately buffered or separated. 16 1. Uses proposed shall be consistent with those listed as allowable uses in the respective zoning districts. 2. Uses listed as special uses in the zoning district in which the development is located may be allowed. E. The Plan Commission may recommend and the City Council may approve access to a dwelling by a driveway or pedestrian walk easement. Off street parking facilities for such dwelling shall be located not more than two hundred feet(200)from the dwelling served. F. The Plan Commission also may recommend and the City Council may approve yards of lesser widths or depths than required for permitted uses in the zoning classification which the planned development is including,provided: a. Those protective covenants are recorded with perpetual access easements and off street parking spaces for use by the residents of the dwellings served. b. That spacing between buildings shall be consistent with the ph ' n of recognized site planning principles for securing a unified development and th ue c eration is given to the openness normally afforded by intervening streets an Sys,, 1, c. The yards for principal buildings along the periphj&()IWLe de lopment shall be not less in width or depth than required for permitted u in ct in which the planned unit development is included and the plan is developed ti"a ord adequate protection to neighboring properties,i.e. fire protection and sufficient area need5r utility easements, as recommended by the Plan Commission and approved b ,he Cif ouncil. G. Design Criteria: All standards of the Un' ed Cit' o ille Design Guidelines (Ord. 2009-28) and the Section 7.00 Design Standards of the d Cit f Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance's shall apply to all Planned Unit Development 10-13-12: FEES: The approved char and enses r development fees, application fees, review fees and deposits for matters pertaining to this chapter shall be established by the City Council. These fees shall be approved by ordinance with a copy file the clerk's office and may be altered or amended from time to time,but only by City Council approval.Itil all applicable fees, charges and expenses have been paid in full, no action shall be taken on any application or appeal. (Ord.2006-40,5-23-2006) 10-13-13: SEVERABILITY: Each section,clause and provision of this chapter shall be considered as separable,and the invalidity of one or more shall not have any effect upon the validity of other sections, clauses or provisions on this chapter. (Ord.2006-40,5-23-2006) 17 10-13-14: EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: A. The planned unit development shall be constructed in a timely manner. The planned unit development shall be subject to revocation under the following conditions: 1. Final Plat approval does not occur within twelve(12)months from the date of approval of the preliminary plat of a planned unit development. 2. Construction does not commence and proceed within three(3)years from the date of approval of the Final Plat of a Planned Unit Development. 3. The City Council may extend the time limits for Final Plat approval for no more than two(2) 12- month periods. Commencement for construction may also be extended by the City Council in one (1)year increments. B. The City Council may initiate or the owner of the parcel of land on which the Planned Unit Development is to be constructed may apply for the revocation of the Planned Unit Development. The owner shall be notified,in writing, at least thirty(30) days prior twthe City Council's consideration of the revocation if initiated by the City Council. C. The City Council shall consider, but not be limited to e f standards in the review of the status of the project construction to determine whether t e nable cause for delay: a. The original program of develop t with gard to market demand for the components included in the final plan; b. Conditions in the real esta' nance arket; c. General economic conditio i ocal area,state or region; d. The ability anal osef ess f development operations for the Planned Unit Development; a d e. Law ordi nce ther regulations that may have affected timely development of the prof D. Upon consideration of t e findings by the City Council regarding the standards in Subsection 10-13- 14-C,the City Council shall decide whether: a. To revoke those portions of the Planned Unit Development for which construction has not begun; b. To extend the time allotted for construction to commence based upon a revised schedule of construction,or c. To require special changes in the Planned Unit Development as a condition of a time extension, whereby such changes shall be deemed a"major change"to the Planned Unit Development. E. Upon revocation of a Planned Unit Development, the parcel of land shall conform to the permitted uses and other regulations of the underlying zoning district of which it is a Special Use unless an 18 amendment or other Special Use is initiated by the City Council or is applied for by the owner of the parcel of land on which the Planned Unit Development was to be constructed and granted by the City Council. 10-13-15: EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effective immediately after passage, approval and publication in book form according to law,and its regulations shall be in effect except where a Final Plat for Planned Unit Development has been approved and building permit issued prior to the enactment of this ordinance, and further providing that substantial change of position, expenditures or incurrence of obligations by or on behalf of the applicant of such approval or building permit would occur as a result of compliance with the ordinance. Applications for Concept PUD Plan Review, or amendments to approved Preliminary PUD Plat or Final PUD Plat under the former Planned Unit Development (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) shall automatically become null and void by the enactment of this ordinance, less acted upon prior to the enactment of this ordinance. 09 19 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION PC 2012-01 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, is proposing to amend Title 10, Chapter 13: Planned Unit Development, of the Municipal Zoning Ordinance to comprehensively revise the method and procedure in which planned unit development(PUD) applications are considered for approval. Copies of the proposed ordinance are on file with the City Clerk. You are further notified that the proposed ordinance may be changed, modified, amended or redrafted in its entirety after the public hearing. NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the Plan Commission for the United City of Yorkville will conduct a public hearing on said application on Wednesday, February 8, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. at the Yorkville City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. The public hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice being published. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. Any written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville City Clerk, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560, and will be accepted up to the date of the public hearing. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. BETH WARREN City Clerk BY: Lisa Pickering Deputy Clerk DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION City Council Chambers Wednesday,April 11, 2012 7:00pm Commission Members in Attendance: Chairman Tom Lindblom Sandra Adams Jane Winninger Jeff Baker Art Prochaska James Weaver Charles Kraupner Absent: Jack Jones, Michael Crouch Other City Staff City Administrator Bart Olson Alderman Larry Kot Alderman George Gilson Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Economic Development Director Chris Funkhouser, Alderman Other Guests— George Frost Ray Wolson Barb Wolson Tom Gilmour Judy Gilmour Paula Gawlik Tom Corredato Sue Corredato Nick Hettinger Art Williams Kathy Theis Steve Theis Lynn Neal Tim Neal Don Hirsch Fred DuSell David Schultz Pam Robinson Sharon Rose Chris Galbraith Mark Johnson Matt Schury,Kendall County Record Angie Phipps, Court Reporter Jillian Duchnowski, Yorkville Patch Meeting Called to Order Chairman Tom Lindblom called the meeting to order at 7pm. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Previous Meeting Minutes -March 14, 2012 The minutes were approved as presented on a motion by Baker and second by Prochaska. Voice vote approval. 1 Citizen's Comments Joe Phillips of Brandon Road Properties made a statement to become part of the public record. This was in regards to 2 reports included in FOIA requests made in January 2012. He said the reports were in the hands of Yorkville City officials and included drainage and traffic studies at the intersection of Pavilion Rd. and Fox Rd. He said this information was available to the City when the Council voted and would have answered many questions at the previous Plan Commission hearing. He said the info was not turned over to his company, making the City in violation of the FOIA's. Public Hearings 1. 2012-01 United City of Yorkville is proposing to amend Title 10, Chapter 13: Planned Unit Development of the Municipal Zoning Ordinance to comprehensively revise the method and procedure in which Planned Unit Development(PUD) applications are considered for approval. A motion was made and seconded by Prochaska and Adams,respectively to open the Hearing. Voice vote approval. The hearing opened at 7:07pm and closed at 7:08pm on a motion by Winninger and second by Prochaska. Voice vote approval. There was no discussion or public comment. (See Court Reporter's Transcript) Old Business 1. PC 2012-02 D. Construction Management, Petitioner, on behalf of Brandon Road Properties,LLC, Owner, is requesting authorization within the R-2 One-Family District to temporarily fill low areas and grade portions of a site located at the northeast and southeast corners of Fox Road and Pavilion Road (Evergreen Farm Estates)with uncontaminated soil from roadway projects of the State of Illinois and return to agricultural uses as allowed by Special Use Permit in Section 10-6C-2 and Section 10-6B-2 of the United City of Yorkville City Code. Chairman Lindblom said there are 6 standards to determine if criteria are met in order to recommend Special Use to the Council. He also noted the vote 0-5 against the motion at the March Plan Commission meeting. The City Council will make the final decision. Chairman Lindblom said each point would be read and then discussed. Standards are paraphrased as follows: 1. Establishment of Special Use will not be unreasonably detrimental to the public health, safety etc. Commissioner Prochaska said he was concerned about the task at hand. At the last meeting, it was determined it was permissible as a Special Use, however, not permissible for that zoning. He said he was quoted in the minutes just approved, that there was not enough information to approve. He said the Commission's decision was based on the information they had at the time. The grading plan information was also not available at 2 the time. Baker stated it would not be detrimental to the general welfare, however, Prochaska said it could not be determined if this would or wouldn't be an issue with the information on that night. Mr. Baker countered that the State has very strict policies concerning water runoff. Mr. Prochaska said if the Special Use was approved as part of a development, the petitioner would need a preliminary plat with detention provisions. Because this is a special use, there is no plat required. It was suggested the reports Mr. Phillips referred to should be given to the City Council. The rest of the Commissioners said they did not know if the special use would be detrimental,based on the information at the last meeting. 2. Special use will not be injurious to use of other property, nor substantially diminish property values.... Due to the lack of information on the storage method of the dirt, the Commissioners agreed the dirt could be injurious. 3. Establishment of the special use will not impede normal development and improvement of surrounding property... The Commissioners said they did not feel this would be an issue. 4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other facilities being provided... All agreed there was no documentation for this. 5. Adequate measures taken to provide ingress/egress to minimize traffic congestion.. Commissioner Weaver said this would be affected by the County who would issue the permits. A staff recommendation was made to align the entrances of the northern and southern parcels off Fox. Chairman Lindblom said there could be an effect on traffic congestion. 6. Special use shall conform to the applicable regulations of the district except as any regulations being modified by the City recommended by the Plan Commission.... None of the Commissioners were aware of any issues. New Business (Description same as #1 under Public Hearings) Ms. Barksdale-Noble said staff has been working with the Zoning Commission to update the zoning code. The PUD ordinance was also considered and research was done on State codes. In order to encourage development, more info will be provided upfront to spur construction. The entire ordinance and code were modified. It was suggested to have Plan Commission and Park Board meet in joint meetings, however, the Park Board was concerned they would not have a vote. 3 Ms. Barksdale-Noble presented a chart showing the proposed steps for a review process for building: 1. Application 2. Concept PUD or preliminary/final PUD plat 3. Go before City Council for feedback Action Item i. Text Amendment Motion: A motion was then made by Adams and seconded by Kraupner to approve this amendment. Discussion: Mr. Prochaska said a mixed use might be better and an overlay district was suggested by Ms. Barksdale-Noble. Roll call: Adams-yes, Winninger-yes, Baker-yes, Prochaska-yes, Weaver-yes, Kraupner- yes, Lindblom-yes. Passed 7-0. Additional Business Ms. Barksdale-Noble said that Evergreen Farms will be on the agenda at the next City Council meeting on April 24. Adi ournment Prochaska moved and Kraupner seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. Voice vote approval and the meeting was adjourned at 7:33pm. Respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker 4 c►ry0 Memorandum EST. 1ss6 To: Yorkville Park Board From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation t X11 co CC: Tim Evans, Superintendent of Recreation �� Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks <LE r° Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Bart Olson, City Adminsitrator Date: March 14, 2012 Subject: Proposed Text Amendment to the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Ordinance Per recommendations from Staff, the Zoning Commission and the City Attorney, changes to the Planned Unit Development Ordinance have been outlined in the attached memo written by Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director. The ordinance revisions streamline the process for development. In Section 10-13-5 Pre-Application Conference, staff will review potential application and advise the applicant on compliance with the comprehensive plan and other planning documents such as the Parks and Recreation Master Plan and Integrated Transportation Plan(shared-use path planning.) Previous practice was that the plan would be brought to Park Board and comments would be made directly to the developer. In the revised ordinance, there is a representative from the Park Board that will attend the Plan Commission meeting to comment on the proposal. All Park Board members are welcome to comment on this plan at that time during the Public Hearing on any development. The changes in the document pertaining to the Park Board's role are in 10-13-7, E. E. Park Board Representative: When applicable for the Park Board's review of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation, the Park Board shall have a representative present at the Plan Commission public hearing meeting for input and recommendation to the City Council. The recommendations may include conditions of approval intended to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. 1) Park Board Representative's Purview(If Applicable): The Park Board Representative shall consider the following standards when considering the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation: a. Compatibility of the proposal with the recreation master plan and park development standards. b. Layout and organization of the open space system. c. Compliance with the city's land-cash ordinance for parks. Previously any PUD plan submitted to the City went through the following meetings and would take approximately 120 days for approval: 1. Pre-application Conference 2. Plan Council 3. Plan Commission* 4. Park Board* 5. EDC* 6. City Council* The new process would reduce the meetings, with one being optional, and take approximately 90 days: 1. Pre-application Conference 2. Optional City Council* 3. Plan Council* 4. Plan Commission* 5. City Council* *Public meeting. The changes to the PUD Ordinance were proposed by Zoning Commission, reviewed by the City Engineer, Attorney, and Staff, taken to EDC, and will be going to Plan Commission then City Council for final approval. This process is consistent with other communities PUD approvals. APPROVED 4/12/12 Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department City Hall 800 Game Farm Road March 22, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. Call to Order: Ken Koch called the meeting to order at 6:59 p.m. Roll Call: Ken Koch-yes; Debbie Horaz -yes; Kelly Sedgwick- no;Amy Cesich -yes;Vicki Covney-no; Mark Dilday-yes; Seaver Tarulis -yes. Introduction of City Officials and Staff: Laura Schraw-Director of Parks and Recreation Scott Sleezer- Superintendent of Parks Tim Evans - Superintendent of Recreation Other Guests: None. Public Comment: None. Presentations: None. Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the March 8, 2012 meeting were approved. Motion was made by Seaver Tarulis and seconded by Deb Horaz. Bill Review: The board reviewed the bills list. Ken Koch stated Tommy McNeal was a great referee this year for REC Basketball. Tim stated he will let Shay know. Amy Cesich asked about the price for mulch. Scott stated the city shops the price each year for the best price. The bills list was approved. Motion was made by Amy Cesich and seconded by Mark Dilday. Park Board Budget Report February 2011 and Park Board Budget Report for February 2012 -The board had no questions regarding the budget reports. Old Business: None. New Business: Proposed Text Amendment to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) Ordinance - Laura Schraw stated previously the process would go through several different committees, commissions and city council and not necessarily be changed. The proposal is that instead of going through so many committees and boards, the majority of the commenting will occur from staff which happens before the plan is released to the public. Laura said she will sit in and make sure plans meet the city's master plan and it is the proper direction to go with the next park development. After that meeting, they would go to plan commission and we would have a park board member there to represent and reinforce the points. Laura said the park board representative comments would be included in the hearing. After that, the planning commission will vote on it and forward it to city council. Laura said it is a way to have a representative sit on the commission and be a vocal representative of the park board. Ken Koch asked if the person would be sitting on the planning commission. Laura stated the person would be a voting member. Ken asked how that works with the Mayor appointing process. Laura said she is assuming they would expand the committee by a member,but only be there when there is something park board related and not all the time. Laura stated at that time, the park board member would be a voting member and their comments would be included in the public hearing. The board discussed how things worked in the past in Yorkville when working with developers. Ken Koch said he would like that process to remain intact somehow. Ken said the board needs to hear the plans staff is taking to planning commission. Scott said prior when they submitted a plan to park board, staff would create a memo with staff recommendations to the developers. Laura stated the point of this process is by the time this gets to Park Board the developer should be following staff recommendations. Ken said there might be items where they decide to do something different because of a potential school site or something. Laura said she doesn't think that is an issue because staff is reviewing things and knowing what the city needs. Ken stated if he gets wind of something he things is wrong with the PUD, he stated he is then forced to go to city council and go against staff. Laura said no,because you have the planning commission. He said but you are forcing a park board member to go to city council to explain. Laura said no not necessarily. She said staff comments will be in a memo that will go to city council. Scott stated this will actually help by getting this to the developers earlier and come to park board when staff has already seen it. Deb Horaz doesn't like just one person not the full board involved. Ken said staff needs to make sure early in the process it is run by this board at some point, so the board can see it. Laura said it comes to park board after it is in the planning commission packet. Laura said the staff is not trying to not speak to the board about it, it just might not be prior to the planning commission meeting. Ken asked if it then goes directly to city council. Laura stated yes. Scott said he understands the concerns the board has. Scott said the staff has been great about updating the city plans and the staff is pro park and the board should trust in the staff. Deb Horaz said we do,but we as a board would like to give our advice and then just one person on the board is representative. Amy said the staff is ever changing so then what happens. Laura said in other districts the park board members don't have any say in park designs. Ken asked what was the reasoning for this change. Laura said staff and the attorney because of policies in other communities. Krysti understands your value and recommended to have a representative there from park board. Laura said in Yorkville, the board has more of a voice here than other communities. She said staff will tell you what is going on. Ken said he likes the idea of being part of planning commission. Ken said he just wants an avenue to stop something the park board doesn't like. Laura said if we have to call an extra meeting to discuss something, we can always do that. Ken said before it goes to planning commission, get it to the board so that we can see what is going forward. Laura said because the plan has to be published for open hearing,we will have to wait until after the meeting to discuss it. Laura said we can have a meeting before it goes to city council. Deb Horaz stated the staff needs to communicate what their wants are so the board is one the same page. Deb asked if this is an appointed position. Laura said she doesn't think so, she will check on it. Amy asked if we can rotate the person. Laura said when you are there,whatever you say is in the public hearing, which holds more value than you know. Laura said if the board is adamantly against this, I will pass it to Krysti. Ken said it needs to come to the park board in a meeting before it goes to planning commission. Ken said the developers don't need to come here and take their time. Amy said she does like having the member at the planning commission and board agreed. Ken said he doesn't think this will be a problem in the near future because of the developments sitting empty right now. He stated it could be years before there is any new developments. Amy said she wants to see the developments that are already here developed before anything new is built. Laura said right now the advantage the board has is having someone here in this building involved in all the planning. Laura said she is involved in so much, she knows what is going on. The board agreed they want a voting member on the planning commission. Ken said he just wants something to come through here before the planning commission meeting. Laura said she will ask if the representative is appointed or not and if we can change it to come through the park board first. Amy said she just finds it interesting that the trend is the park board is being phased out and gives leverage to the council. Laura said staff wants the park board. Amy said she likes the idea of streamlining so things can move along quicker. Amy said she just wants to be careful that the importance of this board doesn't get lost. Deb said we work as a team here. Ken said he doesn't want to have to argue with staff. Laura said sometimes they don't listen,but that is why we keep writing memos and state what the staff and park board want. Laura said she will talk to Krysti and get some more answers. Reports: Directors Report-Laura stated a resident came and spoke about Riverfront and Beecher park and his concerns about not removing Beecher like Riverfront. The board was happy to hear of that concern because they agree. Laura recommended the board to attend the city council meetings so they can state the concern that parks and recreation are vital to this community. Deb stated she thinks the public does support parks and recreation. Ken stated services should not be cut. Deb said people came to this town with these programs. Amy said it is a contradiction.Amy said the city is trying to get people to move here, yet cutting programs. Parks Report - Scott stated the lights are going up on the tennis courts next week. He stated the city is doing all the electric, so it will be a few months before they are on. The paving should be mid to late April. Recreation Report -Amy asked about the memberships at the REC Center. Tim stated it is about the same as last year, the weather has hurt us a bit. Tim said they are going to cut back on staff hours a little bit. Tim said the 5K sign up is going well. Additional Business: None. Adiournment• There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:10 p.m. Motion was made by Amy Cesich and seconded by Ken Koch. *Items needed for Board approval or recommendation. Minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Godwin Minute Taker c►ry0 Memorandum EST. 1ss6 To: Yorkville Park Board From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation t X11 (4 CC: Tim Evans, Superintendent of Recreation �� Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks <LE r° Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: April 4, 2012 Subject: Proposed Text Amendment to the Planned Unit Development(PUD) Ordinance The proposed text amendment to the PUD Ordinance discussed at the last Park Board meeting on March 22nd had a few follow up questions. 1) Can the plan come to Park Board prior to going to Plan Commission so the entire Park Board can comment on the plan? I spoke with Krysti and she said that once the formal application has been submitted to the City we can bring the development plan to the Park Board for comment. It should be assumed that the petitioner already had a pre-application meeting seeking staff's recommendations based on the Master Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plan and ordinances. They do have the option to go to City Council and presented a conceptual plan at any time during this process. Staff will be able to bring the plan to you at the first available Park Board meeting after the application is received. Typically there will be 45 days until the Plan Commission meeting from the time of application therefore there should be time to bring the plan to Park Board. There must be at least 30 days for the public hearing notice, therefore it is rare that the Plan Commission meeting with the agenda item will be any sooner than 45 days. 2) Is the position appointed? The person filling the position by the Park Board member can be determined by the Park Board. You can have one person for a set time or rotate, however you see fit. APPROVED 5/10/12 Yorkville Parks and Recreation Department City Hall 800 Game Farm Road April 12, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. Call to Order: Ken Koch called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Roll Call: Ken Koch -yes; Debbie Horaz - yes; Kelly Sedgwick-yes;Amy Cesich- no; Vicki Covney-no; Mark Dilday-no; Seaver Tarulis -yes. Introduction of City Officials and Staff: Laura Schraw-Director of Parks and Recreation Scott Sleezer- Superintendent of Parks Tim Evans - Superintendent of Recreation Other Guests: None. Public Comment: None. Presentations None. Approval of Minutes: The minutes from the March 22, 2012 meeting were approved. Motion was made by Seaver Tarulis and seconded by Kelly Sedgwick. Bill Review: Deb Horaz asked a couple questions about legal fees. Laura said she will check what they were for and let her know at the next meeting. Tim stated the fee was probably for the Pepsi agreement. Deb asked about a deposit refund. Tim said he will check on it and let her know. Deb asked about $140.00 Yorkville Glass and Mirror. Scott stated he put new pivot points on the doors at the REC Center. Motion was made to approve the bills list by Kelly Sedgwick and seconded by Seaver Tarulis. Bill list was approved. Old Business: Proposed Text Amendment to the PUD Ordinance -Laura stated she spoke to Krysti and she stated that once the formal application is submitted, we can bring the development plans to the park board for comment. She said from the time the application is submitted, we have 45 days, which leaves enough time to bring it to the Park Board and discuss the recommendations. Ken said the Mayor said the board can always ask the Council and Mayor to table it until the board has a chance to decide. Ken asked about Park Board recommendation to PUD. Laura said the Park Board representative would sit on the Plan Commission. Ken asked if the Park Board didn't like the plan, how would that work. Laura said the representative would come and state how the Park Board feels and let Planning Commission know the recommended changes. Ken stated his concern that one vote will still not matter. Ken said he would like to see the recommendation from the board go along with that. Laura said that is what the representative will do is relay the feelings of Park Board. Deb and Ken stated this is a totally different way to handle these things. Laura stated the Park Board is still making the recommendation. Ken said there needs to be other avenues, otherwise the Park Board member will be fighting staff. Laura said the city will make recommendations as to what the city has done in the past. Deb said in the past, Park Board made a decision as a board and we had a liaison that helped get our concerns across. Deb said now Planning Commission can deny it or do what they want. Laura stated that the memo to City Council will give the recommendations of Park Board and your concerns. Scott stated staff follows a master plan and what if the Park Board decides they want to change something on the master plan. Scott said Ken's concern is those situations, so how will these situations play out. Laura stated the city documents everything by memos. Ken stated the developer always met with Park Board previously and our recommendation was submitted. There was much discussion about Park Board concerns with the city changing this process. Laura stated the Park Board is still having their recommendation heard by their representative. Deb Horaz said she feels it is a way to sidestep Park Board. Laura stated if there is a contentious issue, the board has 45 days to discuss their concerns. Ken stated he wants to see a yay or nay recommendation from the Park Board go along to City Council. Ken stated he liked how things worked in the past, since the board always had a representative for Park Board. Scott said the board does have Laura involved with Park Board now. The Park Board all stated they would like to meet Krysti and have her attend a Park Board Meeting. Ken said he wants a Park Board recommendation along with the PUD that goes to City Council. Ken wants an official Park Board recommendation not a memo to be read at Planning Commission. Laura stated she wants the board to be comfortable with whatever the decision. The board had discussion about how things have previously been done. Laura said she would like to write up a formal procedure so that it is documented so the city knows the procedure the city is supposed to follow. Deb Horaz asked questions about how these hearings work and Laura answered her questions. Ken asked when this change is supposed to take place. Laura stated April 24th. Deb stated basically the board doesn't want to be put out of the loop and she doesn't want to put the pressure on that one representative. Laura stated, but the board is making their recommendation and that representative takes it to the meeting. Laura stated if they didn't want Park Board recommendation, the city wouldn't put a Park Board member on the Planning Commission. Laura stated other cities do not have Park Board members involved in Planning Commissions. The board discussed that they feel their influence is shrinking. Laura said she will let Krysti know. Laura said if the board is that concerned, they need to attend City Council and voice their concerns. Laura stated the board has the right to fight it. New Business: Illinois Whitewater Festival Special Use Request *- Scott said this was his idea. Scott said the city has allowed camping in the parks before. Scott said it will be a one time thing for this particular weekend for the Ribs on the River event. Scott said the city can make specific rules for this camping event. Ken asked about Police patrolling. Laura said the police were fine with it. No alcohol will be allowed. The city will provide port-o-pottys. Scott said he thought it was a nice idea to keep people in town to eat and shop etc. If it goes well, the city could advertise it for residents. Ken said he wants to make sure the police are in agreement to patrol this. Scott said the city will come up with a set of rules for this event. Scott said the fee will go into the event. Ken asked for the next meeting to have a number for how many people and the rules set. Nicor Gas Waiver of Fees Request *- Laura stated Nicor is doing a volunteer day in Yorkville on May 19th to clean up our riverfront. Laura stated they are asking for a waiver of fee to use the shelter. The Board unanimously agreed. Motion was made by Seaver Tarulis and seconded by Kelly Sedgwick. YMCA Tri-City Challenge Waiver of Fees Request *-Laura stated the YMCA is holding their annual Tri-City Challenge. Scott said they canoe,bike and run from Yorkville to the Sandwich Hospital. Scott stated in the past, they have paid the fee, which is $95.00. The board unanimously agreed not to waive the fee. Motion was made by Deb Horaz and seconded by Kelly Sedgwick not to waive the fee. 2012 Grant Applications * - Scott said the city still hasn't heard on grants from last year,but he stated the city needs to start thinking grants now. Scott said maybe we should reapply for Riverfront, if we are turned down. Scott said he thinks the city should look at doing a development grant for Bristol Bay 65 and look at things we don't have like a stake park. Scott said the city could also go after an acquisition grant. He said with land prices so low, he would like to see a regional park. There was discussion by the board about a regional park, what to include and how to do it in the five year period. Deb said it would be great for festivals. The board discussed what parks are already out there and what hasn't been finished yet. Deb asked if the REC Center purchase goes through, should the board look at doing improvements on that. Scott stated that would be on the following year, but it would be a great idea. Laura said last year the grants were announced May 25th and due July 1 st, so Laura said we need to get a proposal to the City Council in May, so we can make changes if needed. Scott stated he likes the land acquisition idea. Deb agreed. The board discussed different locations and how many acres would be wanted and how much it would cost, and what kind of park would be best. Laura stated the board will have to go into executive session next meeting to discuss property ideas. The board stated they were in favor of doing that. Ken asked if there are grants to revamping old playgrounds. Scott stated yes. Ken said that might be a good idea for some of the parks in Yorkville. Laura stated that because Yorkville has so many playgrounds, we don't score high on the list. Park Board Meeting Time and Schedule Changes * -Ken stated because things are not as busy as in the past, we can probably do one full meeting and a bills meeting per month. Laura stated if we need to have additional business added, she stated that we can do that. Laura said each meeting will still have public comments. Laura said because there are so many summer events, if we have the first meeting at the beginning of the month, we can move the time up so we don't finish so late. The bills list meeting can also be moved up to 5:30 p.m. Deb stated the only thing that happened in the past at bills only meeting sometimes things would be discussed. She said just put additional business on there to cover us in the open meetings act. Laura said the next bills list meeting will be April 26, 2012 at 5:30 p.m. Laura asked about the May I Oth meeting time. The board decided to change the starting time of the meeting to 6:00 p.m. Reports: Director Report -Laura said she worked on designing a parking lot for behind Geneva Kayak Building. She stated they are waiting on the quote amount. She stated it is not a concern for out budget. Laura said she met with Tim Sullivan about the land cash appraisal and should hear something soon probably at the May 10th meeting. Recreation Report -Tim said this year we are getting $7,500 for the Pepsi agreement. It is $1,500 per year. Tim stated the contract is still being finalized. Scott said it might be for equipment,we still have to decide. Tim said every time we buy a case of something we get $2.00 this year we will get $2.50. Parks Report -The weather has been great this year for getting things done. Scott stated the baseball fields are very dry, but they are up and running. Scott said the lights are up at the tennis courts. They are not plugged in. Scott said they should be up and running in the next couple months. Scott stated that a soccer group did another rental with us and it helped pay for the new goals we purchased. Additional Business: None. Adjournment: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:45 p.m. Motion was made by Kelly Sedgwick and seconded by Seaver Tarulis. Minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Godwin, Minute Taker `� 13 fry Reviewed By: �� �•s► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ EDC—NB #3 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development j� ���� Police F-1 Public 2012-20 LE Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation 0 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Resolution for Sale of Public Property Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Proposal to begin an RFP process for sale of the Old Post Office at 201 W Hydraulic St Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid 1s36 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: June 7, 2012 C<wrMY Sad LE Subject: Resolution for the sale of public property Summary Consideration of a request for bids on the City's Old Post Office building, located at 201 W Hydraulic Street. Background The City purchased the Old Post Office building from the US Postal Service (USPS) in February 2006. At the time, the USPS was moving out of its smaller, outdated downtown facility, to a larger, newer facility off of Countryside Parkway. Under the USPS's rules, they were allowed to offer the property to the City and then sell it. The appraised price of the property, at the time, was $300,000 and the USPS agreed to sell it to the City for $275,000. After the City purchased the property, the Parks and Recreation department was given the facility as its administrative offices. Prior to their move into the facility, the Parks and Recreation department decided to renovate the facility for $100,000. The facility was used as the administrative offices of the Parks and Recreation department for the next 4 years. In 2010, the Parks and Recreation department moved all employees up to the REC Center, for strategic purposes. Since then, the facility has primarily been used as a recreation programming space. Currently, there are an average of 5-6 programs held in the facility per week. Classes being held in the facility usually run on Monday, Wednesday and Friday at various times throughout the day (2-3 per day, 1-2 hours per class) and may include "Let's Speak Spanish!", "Ready, Set, Go!", and"Wild Wild West". All of these classes would be moved with minimal issues, should a proposal be approved by the City Council. Interested buyers Several weeks ago, members of the City were approached by a developer interested in purchasing the site from the City with the intent to turn it into a commercial property. We believe that developer has since decided to move on to other properties in Yorkville, but we have been approached by another party interested in turning the site into either a light manufacturing or commercial development. The plans initially discussed by the first developer and the second developer both fit within the downtown TIF redevelopment plan. For purposes of protecting their future proposals, staff can not elaborate upon the specific development proposals. Process for selling public property As a non-home rule municipality, we can sell public property in only one of two ways. The first method involves hiring a real estate agency, public auctioneer, or directing staff to sell the property, but not at a price less than 80% of an appraised value. This method ends up costing the municipality in real estate agency fees or auction fees, and requires the municipality to spend money getting an appraisal. Further, this first method does not allow the municipality to sell property at less than 80% of its appraised price—even though there may be good reasons for doing so (such as stimulating downtown development). The second method to sell property involves an RFP process. The municipality firsts passes a resolution directing staff to solicit bids (contemplated in this agenda item), to publish notices soliciting bids, and to set a date where the proposals are opened by the City Council and reviewed. After the opening, the City Council may select any proposal they see as beneficial, and approve it with a 3/4 majority. This sale method offers the City more flexibility in the final proposal by being able to trade a lower purchase price for development commitments (i.e. maybe we would consider selling it for cheaper, if the property were significantly renovated). It also gives the City an auction-type process,perhaps encouraging more developers to come forward with better bids. Finally, the REP process still allows the City to reject all bids should they decide not to sell the property. For these reasons, staff recommends the RFP process as the preferred method to sell public property, if the City Council chooses to explore the sale of the Old Post Office. Additional items to consider While the ultimate decision to sell the property does not need to be made for a few months (after the RFP process), the following details should also be considered in any decision to sell the property: 1) The City's Downtown Vision Plan called for a long riverwalk from the east end of Riverfront Park,under the Route 47 bridge, and across to the park on West Hydraulic. It may be prudent to include a requirement that a portion of the Riverfront be retained by the City for future access (can be accomplished through an easement). 2) This property has not been on the property tax rolls since the USPS originally purchased it, decades ago. If the City sells the property to a business entity, the property will be put back on the tax rolls, resulting in a large incremental property tax increase for the Downtown TIF fund(meaning, the City will have more money generated by that single property for redevelopment). 3) Should the City Council approve a bid that requires TIF assistance via a TIF agreement, that TIF agreement and purchase contract would have to again be published after it is approved by City Council. This process involves, essentially a second 30-day RFP, whereby any developers have the right to come to the City and put forward a better offer or development idea for the property. Again, this second RFP is only required if the City approves a sale offer that requires TIF assistance. Recommendation Since the City has received two preliminary inquiries about the property, staff is seeking direction from the City Council on initiating a request for bids through the RFP process by resolution. Ordinance No. 2012- ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DIRECTING THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, is a non-home-rule municipality pursuant to Article VII, Section 7 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the Illinois Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the best interests of its citizens to sell certain real estate which is no longer needed for City operations, said property being commonly known as 201 West Hydraulic Street, Yorkville, Illinois, identified as parcel number 05-38-278- 007, and legally described as follows: The Westerly 49 feet, 9 3/4 inches of Lot I (Measured along the South line) and the Easterly 50 feet, 2.25 inches of Lot 2 (Measured along the South Line) in Block 8 of Blacks Addition to the Village of Yorkville, in the Village of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, (the "Subject Property") all in accordance with the directions hereafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois as follows: Section T Pursuant to Section 11-76-2 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 511-14-1 et seq.), it is hereby determined to be in the best interest of the citizens of the United City of Yorkville that the City proceed to sell the property commonly known as 201 Hydraulic, Yorkville, Illinois, as hereinabove legally described, because said property is no longer needed for City operations; and, as required by said Section 11-76-2 of the Illinois Municipal Code, the City Administrator is hereby directed to publish a notice for three (3) consecutive weeks in the Kendall County Record, being a newspaper published in the United City of Yorkville, requesting bids on the sale of the Subject Property and including the following information: Ordinance No.2012- Page 1 (i) The current zoning of the Subject Property is B-2, General Business District, which permits general commercial and offices uses; (ii) That all bids are to be sent to: BID Response, United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, Attention: Bart Olson, City Administrator; and, (iii) That bids shall be accepted until 5:00 p.m. on August 13, 2012, and opened at a meeting of the Committee of the Whole of the City Council of the United City of Yorkville on August 13, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. Section 2. The first of the three (3) publications of the notice of sale shall occur on or before July 12, 2012. Section 3. The Mayor and City Council shall have the right to accept or reject any and all bids and may accept the high bid or any other bid determined to be in the best interest of the City by a vote 3/4ths of the Corporate Authorities then holding office, but only a majority vote is required to reject all bids. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage by the Mayor and City Council and approval as provided by law. Ordinance No.2012- Page 2 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2012. CHRIS FUNKHOUSER GEORGE T. GILSON,JR. CARLO COLOSIMO DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS LARRY KOT APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois,this 26`h day of June,A.D. 2012. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Ordinance No.2012- Page 3 `� 13 fry Reviewed By: �� �•s► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ PS—NB #1 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ PS 2012-11 AL ��' Police E Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Liquor license amendment—hours of sale Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Proposal to expand hours of liquor sales for all liquor license classes. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Mayor Golinski Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid W3s From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: June 7, 2012 C<wrMY Sad �tE ��' Subject: Liquor license amendment—hours of sale Summary A change to the hour of liquor sales for all classes of liquor licenses (except temporary and special events)to accommodate requests from liquor license holders and to bring the City in line with surrounding towns. Background This agenda item was requested by Mayor Golinski. Throughout the past few months, he has been approached by various liquor license holders to change the hours of liquor sales to accommodate holiday events (New Years), to be competitive with surrounding towns, and to respond to Sunday events (football). The current hours of sale all licenses for surrounding towns are: Yorkville (bars and restaurants) Monday- Saturday 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Sunday 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Yorkville (package sales) Monday—Thursday 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday& Saturday 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sunday 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Montgomery Monday—Thursday 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday& Saturday 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sunday Noon to 1:00 a.m. Osweizo Monday—Thursday 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday& Saturday &the days before the holidays of Memorial Day, 4th of July, Labor Day & Thanksgiving 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sunday 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Sugar Grove Monday— Sunday 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Plano Monday— Saturday 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Sunday 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Proposal The proposal in the attached ordinance would take Yorkville's hours of operations for all licenses to 6 am to 1 am Sunday through Thursday, and 6 am to 2am Friday and Saturday. Additionally, the eve of major holidays would be automatically approved for an extension of closing time to 2 am. Mayors have historically approved extensions in hours for New Year's Eve and Thanksgiving Eve, and we thought Oswego's inclusion of Memorial Day, 4th of July and Labor Day was good. The final component of the ordinance removes the restrictions on the hours of operations for patio licenses. The City's noise ordinances 55 db in the evening from the lot line of any residential properties would still remain in place, and the patio license sections still contains a provision that restricts amplified music or other outdoor performances to before l Opm. Ordinance No. 2012- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS,PROVIDING FOR LIQUOR CONTROL WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a non home-rule municipality in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and has the powers granted to it by law; WHEREAS, the Liquor Control Act of 1934, 235 ILCS 511-1, et seq., (the "Liquor Control Act") sets forth a comprehensive system for the regulation of liquor control within the state of Illinois, and authorizes broad powers to municipalities with regard to local retail licenses; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to amend the regulations pertaining to the sale of liquor as set forth in the City Code of the United City of Yorkville as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Section 3-3-12 of the City Code is hereby amended by deleting section (A) in its entirety and replacing said section with the following: A. Hours Of Sale: 1. All areas within the licensed premises shall be cleared of customers or secured from customers and the public in general during the time sales are not permitted, and no person, other than the licensee or his employees and agents, shall be permitted within the areas of such premises where alcoholic liquor is stored, shelved or kept during such time and then only for the purpose of cleaning,preparing and arranging stock, and all such areas where alcoholic liquors are stored, shelved or kept shall be secured from the public and it shall be unlawful for any licensee to sell or offer for sale at retail any alcoholic liquor in the city except as permitted for the following hours: (Ord. 1981-11, 11-5-1981) a. All license classes excluding Class SE and Class T licenses: Permitted Hours of Sale Monday through Thursday 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Sunday 6:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. (Ord. 2009-17, 4-14-2009) (Ord. 2008-126, 12-22-2008) 2. On the day immediately preceding the holidays of Memorial Day, the Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving, and New Year's Day, the permitted hours of sale for all license classes, excluding Class SE and Class T licenses, are 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. 3. The times given shall be central standard time unless so called daylight saving time shall be in effect in the city by virtue of any laws of this state or the United States government, in which case such time shall apply. (Ord. 1981-11, 11-5-1981) Section 2. Section 3-3-4-5 of the City Code is hereby amended by deleting section (C) "Hours of Sale" in its entirety. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this Day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this Day of , A.D. 2012. MAYOR 2 `� I3 fry Reviewed By: �� �•s► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ PS—NB #2 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ PS 2012-12 A ��' Police LE Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Video Gaming Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Proposal to permit video gaming devices within City limits. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid W3s From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: June 7, 2012 C<wrMY Sad �LE ��' Subject: Video Gaming Summary A proposal to allow and regulate video gaming machines in the City. Background A few years ago, the State of Illinois approved a gaming expansion that legalized video gaming machines to be placed into bars and restaurants throughout the state, as long as the municipality did not ban them. This gaming expansion was approved without the property administrative rules, so no licenses could be issued. In the past few months, the State indicated that they were close to finishing up the administrative rules and intended to issue state licenses by August. Since those news articles, we have been contacted by a few Yorkville bars and restaurants interested in installing video gaming machines. The state did recently finish the administrative rules, and they are available here - http://ilga.gov/commission/jcar/admincode/011/01101800sections.html. An FAQ on video gaming is attached as well. Our current code on mechanical amusement device licenses specifically prohibits gambling on mechanical amusement devices. Because video gaming devices would require a mechanical amusement device license, this code must be amended should the Council decide to permit video gaming in City limits. The attached ordinance is drafted to permit video gaming— if it is not approved, video gaming will not be allowed within the City. Highlights of the attached ordinance The attached ordinance amends the section of the City Code that deals with mechanical amusement devices, which video gaming terminals are considered. The current mechanical amusement device license fee of$20 will remain, and video gaming terminals are proposed to be at $25 (the state maximum). The City staff also took this opportunity to streamline the process, by exempting background checks for a liquor license holder on mechanical amusement device applications. Previously, mechanical amusement device license applicants had to go through a background check, even if that same operator had completed a background check for a liquor license. Highlights of the Administrative Rules and State Statute 1) Video gaming devices are only allowed in bars and restaurants that sell liquor. Fraternal organizations and Veteran's organizations are allowed to have video gaming devices, too. 2) Devices must not directly dispense coins, cash or tokens—it must reward either free games or credits which can be redeemed for cash. 3) Each establishment may only operate 5 video game devices on its premises. 4) You must be over 21 to use a video gaming device, and must not be visibly intoxicated. 5) All video gaming devices must be physically separated from areas where individuals under 21 can access. 6) The City may impose a fee per device,but that fee may not exceed $25 per device. 7) Cities that allow video gaming receive a share of the income generated within their jurisdictions. The state imposes a 30%tax on net terminal income, and the City receives 1/6t'of that amount. In essence, the City receives 5% on net terminal income. This revenue can be used for any municipal purpose. 8) A unofficial list of municipalities that have and have not prohibited video gaming is located here -http://www.ijzb.state.it.us/VideoGaming_/prohibit.gyx. It should be noted that Yorkville is listed as a location that video gaming is allowed, even though our code prohibits it. 9) One local establishment has already joined the application waiting list for video gaming devices (Ultimate Sports Bar). Recommendation If the City Council wishes to permit video gaming in Yorkville, the attached ordinance should be approved. The ordinance contains all of the protections for the City allowed under state statutes, and imposes the maximum application fee. If the City Council wishes to prohibit video gaming in Yorkville, then no further action is required. Video Gaming On July 13, 2009 Governor Pat Quinn signed the Video Gaming Act (Public Acts 096-0034, 096-0037 and 096- 0038) (the "Act") making Licensed Video Gaming Terminals legal in Illinois. The Act allows for Licensed Video Gaming Terminals to be placed in certain liquor establishments, truck stops and fraternal/veterans clubs throughout the State. The Illinois Gaming Board (the "IGB" or"Board") has the responsibility of implementing and regulating video gaming in Illinois. Frequently Asked Questions regarding the Video Gaming Act and Video Gaming License Applications Updated April 2012 Answers to some common and frequently asked questions related to the Video Gaming Act and Video Gaming License Applications are provided below. The following list is non-exhaustive and may be supplemented or updated in the future. Q1: What is a Video Gaming Terminal? Al: A "Video Gaming Terminal" ("VGT") is an electronic video gaming machine that plays or simulates the play of a video game authorized by the Board upon the insertion of cash. Authorized video games include, but are not limited to, video poker, line up, and blackjack. The VGT must utilize a video display and microprocessors in which the player may receive free games or credits that can be redeemed for cash. VGT does not include a Terminal that directly dispenses coins, cash, or tokens or is for amusement purposes only. Q2: Does the IGB have jurisdiction over "amusement only" devices in Illinois? A2: The IGB does not license "amusement only" devices in Illinois. Questions about the licensure of such devices should be directed to the Illinois Department of Revenue at (312) 814-5232 (Chicago) or (217) 782-3336 (Springfield). Questions or complaints about amusement only devices that illegally pay out should be directed to the police in the municipality where the Terminals are located. Q3: When will the IGB adopt Rules for video gaming? A3: The IGB has adopted Administrative Rules which will dictate how video gaming will operate and be regulated in Illinois. (11111. Admin. Code 1800 et seq.) The Rules can be found on the IGB website, at www.igb.state.il.us/VideoGaming. The IGB continues to promulgate additional rules and the text of any pending rule along with information on how to submit comments on the rule is also posted on the IGB website. Q4: Can local jurisdictions restrict the use of VGTs? A4: Yes. A municipality may pass an ordinance prohibiting video gaming within the corporate limits of the municipality. A county board may pass an ordinance prohibiting video gaming within the unincorporated areas of the county. Video gaming is not allowed in these communities. The IGB is in 1 the process of developing a list of such communities and will post the list on its website in the near future. In addition, a local government may hold a referendum proposing to prohibit video gaming in the municipality. This is otherwise known as an "opt-out" provision. A petition for referendum must be filed in the office of the clerk (municipal or county) at least 90 days before the date of an election. If a majority of the voters vote "YES," video gaming shall be prohibited within the municipality or county. Petitions to prohibit video gaming shall be public documents. A list of the communities that have opted out of video gaming is posted on the IGB website. If you have any questions about the status of your community, please contact your local municipal authority. Q5: What types of licenses will the IGB issue, and when will applications for those licenses be made available? A5: Applications for Manufacturer, Distributor, Supplier, Terminal Operator and Location licenses are currently available on the IGB website. Applications for Technician and Terminal Handler licenses will be available in the near future. Descriptions of the licenses are as follows: "Manufacturer." A manufacturer is an individual, partnership corporation or limited liability company licensed to manufacture or assemble video gaming terminals. "Distributor." A distributor is an individual, partnership corporation, or limited liability company licensed to buy, sell, lease, or distribute video gaming terminals, or major components or parts thereof, to or from terminal operators. "Supplier." A supplier is an individual, partnership corporation or limited liability company licensed to supply major components or parts of video gaming terminals to terminal operators. "Terminal operator." A terminal operator is an individual, partnership corporation or limited liability company licensed to own, service, and maintain video gaming terminals for placement in licensed establishments, licensed truck stop establishments, licensed fraternal establishments, or licensed veterans establishments. "Licensed video gaming location." A licensed establishment, licensed fraternal establishment, licensed veterans establishment, or licensed truck stop establishment, all defined in Question 6,below. "Licensed Technician." A licensed technician is an individual licensed to repair, service, and maintain video gaming terminals. A licensed technician is not licensed under the Act to posses or control a video gaming terminal or have access to the inner workings of a video gaming terminal (i.e., the logic area maintained in a separately locked cabinet of the video gaming terminal which houses electronic components that have the potential to significantly influence the operation of the video gaming terminal). As such, licensed technicians can repair, service and maintain VGTs only outside of the innermost locked area of a VGT housing the electronic logic components that have the potential to significantly influence the operation of the VGT. Such repairs and maintenance would include refilling printer paper, repairing bill validators, resetting tilted Terminals,repairing video displays, etc. 2 "Licensed Terminal Handler." A licensed terminal handler is a person licensed to possess or control a video gaming terminal or to have access to the inner workings of a video gaming terminal (i.e., the logic area maintained in a separately locked cabinet of the video gaming terminal which houses electronic components that have the potential to significantly influence the operation of the video gaming terminal.) The category of"licensed terminal handler" may include, but is not limited to, an employee or independent contractor working for a manufacturer, distributor, supplier, technician, or terminal operator. Q6: What types of locations can be licensed to have VGTs? A6: Video Gaming Terminals may only be placed in the following four categories of Licensed Locations: "Licensed establishment." A licensed establishment is any licensed retail establishment where alcoholic liquor is served for consumption on the premises. "Licensed fraternal establishment." A licensed fraternal establishment is a location where a fraternal organization that derives its charter from its national parent organization regularly meets. "Licensed veterans establishment." A licensed veterans establishment is a location where a qualified veterans organization that holds a charter from its national parent organization regularly meets. "Licensed truck stop establishment." A licensed truck stop establishment is a facility of at least three acres with a convenience store, separate diesel islands for fueling commercial motor vehicles, parking spaces for commercial vehicles, and that sells at retail more than 10,000 gallons of diesel or biodiesel fuel per month. Q7: What type of documentation will be required to meet the definition of Licensed Truck Stop Establishment? A7: An affidavit confirming that the facility is at least 3 acres and has average monthly sales of more than 10,000 gallons of diesel or biodiesel fuel per month (which may be met by showing estimated future sales or past sales). Supporting documentation for these factors must be attached to the affidavit. Q8: What type of documentation will be required to meet the definition of Licensed Fraternal or Veterans Establishment? A8: A copy of the most recent letter from the Internal Revenue Service stating that the Applicant organization is either a fraternal benefit society that is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code, a domestic fraternal society that is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a veterans organization that is exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code. Q9. Who needs to obtain a Technician license under the Video Gaming Act? A9. If an individual is a Licensed Terminal Operator, or is employed by a Licensed Terminal Operator, Licensed Distributor or Licensed Manufacturer, that individual may service, maintain or repair a VGT without obtaining a Technician license. Any other individual who services, maintains or repairs a VGT must obtain a Technician license under the Act. 3 Q10. Who needs to obtain a Terminal Handler license under the Video Gaming Act? A10. Any individual needing access to the inner workings of a VGT. "Inner workings" comprises the logic area inside of a VGT. The logic area has a separate locked compartment inside the VGT which houses electronic components that have the potential to significantly influence the operation of the VGT. The specific electronic components contained in the logic area include: (1) the game's central processing unit(s), (2) communication controller electronics and components housing the communication storage device, and(3)the memory back-up device. Q11: Can an individual be licensed as a Licensed Technician and a Licensed Terminal Handler? All: Yes. Q12: Does a company who provides ticket payout systems to Licensed Terminal Operators and Licensed Locations need to be licensed? Al2: Yes. Major Components or Parts is defined in the applications as "[c]omponents or parts that compromise the inner workings and peripherals of a Video Gaming Terminal, including but not limited to the device's hardware, software, human interface devices, interface ports, power supply, ticket payout system, bill validator, printer and any component which affects or could affect the result of a Game played on the device." Buying, selling, leasing, or distributing Major Components or Parts requires a license. Q13: Does a Licensed Distributor who is distributing VGTs also need a Supplier's license to supply replacement parts for the VGTs it distributes? A13: No. A Licensed Distributor is defined as "[a]n Individual, partnership corporation or limited liability company licensed under the Act to buy, sell, lease or distribute Video Gaming Terminals or major components or parts of Video Gaming Terminals to or from Terminal Operators." Q14: Can an individual who owns a bar also be licensed as a Terminal Operator? A14: Yes, as long as the bar in question is NOT a Licensed Video Gaming Location. In other words, the bar in question may not participate in video gaming, regardless of who would serve as its Terminal Operator. Q15: What are the requirements for licensure under the Act? A15: Many requirements for licensure are listed in Rule 420 of the Video Gaming Rules. In addition, the following are also requirements for licensure: (a) Burden is upon applicant. The burden is upon each applicant to demonstrate suitability for licensure. The Board may issue or deny a license under this Act to any person under the same criteria set forth in Section 9 of the Riverboat Gambling Act (230 ILCS 10/9 (West 2008)). In addition, no person may receive a license under the Act if found by the Board to: (1) Have been convicted of any violation of Article 28 of the Criminal Code of 1961; and/or 4 (2) Have a background (including a criminal record, reputation, habits, social or business associations, or prior activities) that poses a threat to the public interests of the State or to the security and integrity of video gaming; and/or (3) Create or enhance the dangers of unsuitable, unfair, or illegal practices, methods, and activities in the conduct of video gaming; and/or (4) Present questionable business practices and financial arrangements incidental to the conduct of video gaming activities. (b) Background investigations. Each person seeking and possessing a license shall submit to a background investigation conducted by the Board with the assistance of the State Police or other law enforcement. This investigation shall include an applicant's direct and indirect owners, an applicant's officers and directors, and the video gaming manager for a license application. (c) Disclosure of financial interests. Each person seeking and possessing a license under the Act shall disclose the identity of every person or entity having a direct ownership interest in the video gaming operation, and shall disclose each person or entity having an indirect interest of more than 1% in the video gaming operation for which the license is sought. If the disclosed entity is a trust, the application shall disclose the names and addresses of the beneficiaries; if a corporation, the names and addresses of all stockholders and directors; if a partnership, the names and addresses of all partners, both general and limited; if a limited liability company, the names and addresses of all members. (d) License application fees: Manufacturer $5,000 Distributor $5,000 Terminal operator $5,000 Supplier $2,500 Technician $100 Terminal handler $50 (e) Term of License & Annual license fees. A license must be renewed every year, and the annual fees may not exceed these levels: Manufacturer $10,000 Distributor $10,000 Terminal operator $5,000 Supplier $2,000 Technician $100 Licensed establishment (in any category) $100 Video Gaming Terminal $100 Terminal handler $50 Q16: How will the distance restrictions in Section 25(h) of the Act be measured? A16: Video gaming is restricted from the following locations: 5 1) 1,000 feet of a facility operated by an organization licensee, inter-track wagering licensee, or inter- track wagering location licensee licensed under the Illinois Horse Racing Act of 1975 (230 ILCS 511 et seq. (West 2008)) (the Board may waive this restriction in certain circumstances); 2) 1,000 feet of the home dock of a riverboat licensed under the Riverboat Gambling Act (230 ILCS 10/1 et seq. (West 2008)) (the Board may waive this restriction in certain circumstances); or 3) 100 feet of either a school or a place of worship under the Religious Corporation Act (805 ILCS 110/0.01 et seq. (West 2008)). These distances will be determined by measuring the distance from a proposed or existing Licensed Video Gaming Location to a preexisting facility, riverboat, school or place of worship by drawing a straight line between the closest part of any building used for the proposed or existing Licensed Video Gaming Location and the closest part of any building used for the facility, riverboat, school or place of worship. When located within a subsection of property by virtue of a lease, deed, or other arrangement (e.g., a tenant in a shopping center or commercial condominium), measurement shall be from the subsection of property(i.e.,boundaries of the establishment's leased building premises). For purposes of these restrictions, "home dock" is interpreted to mean the casino building or vessel (i.e., the building or vessel housing the casino floor). Q17: Must Licensed Video Gaming Location applicants enter into a signed Use Agreement with a Terminal Operator before they can submit an application to the IGB? A17: No, a signed Use Agreement is not required for a potential Licensed Video Gaming Location to submit an application. However, a Licensed Video Gaming Location must have a signed Use Agreement with a Licensed Terminal Operator prior to the placement of any VGTs in the Licensed Video Gaming Location's establishment. Q18: Do the directors and officers of the parent company of a licensee need to file Personal Disclosure Forms? A18: For license applications that require Personal Disclosure Forms (e.g., Manufacturer, Distributor, Supplier, and Terminal Operator), if the director or officer of the parent company owns more than 5% of the licensee, then that director or officer will need to file a Personal Disclosure Form. Q19: If an entity that has been doing business in Illinois for 48 months prior to July 13, 2009 forms a subsidiary to conduct its video gaming business in Illinois (and would therefore be the Applicant for licensure), would that subsidiary meet the residency requirement (i.e., would the subsidiary meet the requirement that it has been doing business in Illinois for 48 months)? A19: If an entity who meets the residency requirement forms a 100% wholly owned subsidiary to conduct its video gaming business in Illinois, that 100% wholly owned subsidiary meets the residency requirement. Please note that this answer is limited to a 100% wholly owned subsidiary. Q20: Section 3(c) of the Manufacturer/Distributor/Supplier License Application requires 5% or greater shareholders of a publicly-traded parent company of an applicant to submit a Personal Disclosure Form or Business Entity Disclosure Form. How is this requirement being applied to institutional investors/investment advisors that hold the interest for investment purposes and certify in an SEC Schedule 13-G filing that the interest is not for the purpose of controlling the applicant? 6 A20: Pursuant to Rule 520(c), a business entity that qualifies as an institutional investor may submit a Video Gaming Institutional Investor Disclosure Form in lieu of a Video Gaming Business Entity Disclosure Form. Q21: Section 5(A) of the Manufacturer/Distributor/Supplier License Application and Section 4(A) of the Business Entity Disclosure Form require financial statements for a period ending 1 month prior to the date of application. Will the most recently filed SEC reports for a publicly traded company satisfy this requirement? A21: Yes. If reference is made to SEC reports, it will be sufficient if the applicant identifies where those reports can be found on the internet. Q22: Convertible debt is included in the definition of ownership. Does each person who holds convertible debt have to file a Personal Disclosure Form? A22: The Applicant/Licensee must identify each person who holds convertible debt and provide a copy of the applicable debt instrument(s) and associated agreement(s) with the application or upon issuance of the convertible debt. The Board will make a determination as to the debt holder's influence and/or control over the Applicant/Licensee consistent with section 430 of the Video Gaming Rules. The holder of convertible debt must submit a Video Gaming Personal Disclosure Form and any other required document and receive prior Board approval in order to convert the debt. Q23: How long does it take a license to be investigated and approved? A23: The investigation of any application under the Act is a thorough and time consuming process. The length of time it takes the IGB to complete an investigation depends on the type of license applied for, and the complexity of the applicant and any issues involved in the application. Q24: How many VGTs will be allowed at each site? A24: Up to five VGTs may be placed at each Licensed Video Gaming Location. Q25: Are VGTs allowed anywhere inside a Licensed Video Gaming Location? A25: VGTs must be located in an area restricted to persons 21 years of age and over, the entrance to which is within the view of at least one employee who is at least 21 years of age. The placement of VGTs in Licensed Video Gaming Locations shall be subject to section 810 of the Video Gaming Rules. For all Locations that restrict admittance to patrons 21 years of age or older, a separate restricted area is not required. For all Locations that admit individuals under the age of 21, a physical barrier to the gaming area, including but not limited to a short partition, gate or rope shall be required. No barrier shall visually obscure the entrance to the gaming area from an employee of the Location who is over the age of 21. Q26: Are there limits on the hours of operation of a VGT? A26: Yes. Pursuant to Sections 35(b)(2) and 55 of the Act, hours of operation of a VGT must coincide with the legal hours of operation for the consumption of alcoholic beverages on the premises. However, a Licensed Truck Stop Establishment that does not hold a liquor license may operate VGTs on a continuous basis. 7 Q27: Are multi-game VGTs permitted under the Video Gaming Act? A27: Yes, provided that the games have been tested and approved. Q28: Will Licensed Manufacturers need secondary approval for their VGTs? A28: Yes. All VGTs will need to be (1) certified by Gaming Laboratories International pursuant to the IGB's current Technical Standards for Video Gaming Terminals in Illinois, and (2) approved in writing by the IGB for use in Illinois. Q29: In what circumstances can VGTs be displayed in Illinois prior to the actual commencement of video gaming in Illinois? A29: VGTs that are disabled for marketing purposes such that they do not accept money, do not dispense money or payout tickets, or only contain demonstration software that cannot be disabled may, until further notice, be displayed in the following circumstances: 1) Licensed Manufacturers, Licensed Distributors, Licensed Terminal Operators and Applicants for a Manufacturer's License under the Act may display VGTs at "trade shows" or similar events as long as the IGB is notified 10 days in advance of the following information, and prior approval by the IGB is obtained: a. the date and location of the event; b. the model and serial number of each VGT involved; c. the manner of transport of each VGT involved; d. a description of how the VGTs will at all times be possessed by and under the control of the applicant for a Manufacturer's License under the Video Gaming Act. Q30: In what circumstances can VGTs be used in conjunction with focus groups in Illinois prior to the actual commencement of video gaming in Illinois? A30: VGTs that are disabled for marketing purposes such that they do not accept money, do not dispense money or payout tickets, or only contain demonstration software that cannot be disabled may, until further notice,be used in conjunction with a focus group in the following circumstances: 1) Licensed Manufacturers, Licensed Distributors, Licensed Terminal Operators and Applicants for a Manufacturer's License under the Act may use VGTs at "focus groups" as long as the IGB is notified 10 days in advance of the following information, and prior approval by the IGB is obtained: a. the date, time and location of the event; b. the model and serial number of each VGT involved; c. the manner of transport of each VGT involved; d. a description of the purpose of the focus group; e. a description of how the applicant for a Manufacturer's License will be inviting participants; f. a description of the method and amount of compensation of participants, if applicable; and g. any other relevant details regarding the focus group (including but not limited to whether food and beverage will be provided). 2) Alcohol must not be provided to participants of focus groups. 8 Q31: Is compensating or paying a third party a percentage of revenue from a VGT(s) permitted? A31: Compensating any third party based on a percentage of revenue from a VGT is permitted, however, any third party compensated in such a manner will be required to complete a Video Gaming Personal Disclosure Form or a Business Entity Disclosure Form. Financing the purchase of VGTs based on a percentage of revenue will not be permitted. Q32: Has the IGB developed standards to identify an illegal inducement by a Licensed Terminal Operator? A32: Yes. The IGB's Inducement Policy is posted on its website. Q33: Are licensees allowed to use player tracking systems or establish "Players' Clubs" or similar programs that provide rewards to customers for repeated play? A33: Tracking systems and Players Clubs may be authorized by the IGB in the future but are prohibited at this time. Q34: What types of payout systems will be allowed by the IGB? A34: A vault-type or kiosk system provided by a Licensed Supplier or Licensed Distributor, that interfaces with the Central Communications System through a site controller, and that dispenses cash. Specifications for payout systems will be posted on the IGB website in the near future. Pursuant to Section 20 of the Act, a patron must hand a ticket to an appropriate person at a Licensed Location. A patron will not be able to insert a ticket into a payout system by himself or herself. The cash, however, may be dispensed directly to a patron. Q35: Will a Licensed Manufacturer, Licensed Terminal Operator or Licensed Location be permitted to attach an online monitoring system to the second port of a VGT? A35: Yes. Q36: Are Licensed Terminal Operators required to maintain a separate bank account for each Licensed Location, as provided in Rule 250(i)? A36: The IGB is taking steps to eliminate the Rule that requires Licensed Terminal Operators to maintain separate bank accounts for each Licensed Location it contracts with. However, it is still a requirement that revenues generated from the play of VGTs shall be deposited by the Licensed Terminal Operator in one specially created, separate bank account maintained by the Licensed Terminal Operator to allow for electronic fund transfers of moneys for tax payment. 9 Ordinance No. 2012- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,AMENDING THE REGULATIONS FOR AMUSEMENT DEVICES AND INCLUDING VIDEO GAMING TERMINALS WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City pursuant to Section 5/11-42-5 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-42-5) may license, tax and regulate amusements and hereby adopts this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That Title 3, Chapter 4, Section 3-4-2 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended,be and is hereby amended by adding subsection B. to read as follows: "B. Nothing contained in this Chapter shall prohibit an establishment licensed by the Illinois Gaming Board pursuant to the Video Gaming Act (230 ILCS 40/1 et seq.) to operate a video gaming terminal and such terminal shall not be subject to the amusement tax in Article D of this Chapter 4." Section 2. That Title 3, Chapter 4, Article B of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and is hereby amended by amending its title to read as follows: "AMUSEMENT DEVICES" Section 3. That Title 3, Chapter 4, Article B, Section 3-413-1 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended, be and is hereby amended by amending the definition of mechanical amusement devices to read as follows: "AMUSEMENT DEVICES: All mechanical devices of entertainment and games of skill or amusement operated for gain or for profit, including, but not necessarily limited to, the following: video games, other arcade games, billiards and pool tables, pinball games, virtual reality games, computerized games; and any machine which, upon the insertion of a coin, slug, token, plate or disc, may be operated by the public generally for use as a game, entertainment or amusement, whether or not registering a score. It shall include such devices as marble machines, pinball machines, skillball, mechanical grab machines, pistol ranges, baseball games, bowling games, tennis games and any and all devices referred to as arcade equipment, and all games and operations similar thereto under whatever name they may be indicated. It shall also include those amusements operated by remote control, whether or not actuated by insertion of a coin. For purposes of this article, the term "amusement devices" shall not include mechanical devices Ordinance No. 2012- Page 1 commonly known as "kiddie rides" or "carnival amusement rides" designated for child or adult amusement rides or music machines." Section 4. That Title 3, Chapter 4, Article B, Section 3413-3 through 3-413-8 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended,be and is hereby amended to read as follows: "3411-3 LICENSE FEES A. The annual fee for any license required by this article shall be twenty dollars ($20.00) for each table, machine or amusement device except for a video gaming terminal which shall be twenty-five dollars ($25.00). B. If, at the time application is made for a license required by this article and less than six (6) months of the current license year shall have expired, the full fee shall be charged for any amusement device. If more than six (6) months of such current year shall have expired, a license fee of one-half (1/2) the full fee shall be charged for such amusement device, except for a video gaming device, for such portion of the current license year that shall remain unexpired. 3-411-4: INVESTIGATION OF APPLICANT: A. All applications for licenses required by this article,when filed, shall be referred to the city building and zoning officer to assure compliance with the applicable building, zoning and housing ordinances of the city, and no license shall be granted to any applicant at any location unless and until the city building and zoning officer shall have first certified that the proposed location complies with the applicable building, zoning and housing ordinances of the city. B. Upon receipt of any application for license required by this article, the city clerk shall forward such application to such other appropriate agencies or administrators as may be affected, including, but not limited to, the local liquor control commissioner if liquor is to be sold upon the premises where such amusement device is to be held and to the Kendall County health officer if food is to be dispensed upon the premises. No license shall be issued until such agency or administrator, as the case may be, shall have certified that the intended location of the place of business is in compliance with all other applicable ordinances. C. An applicant that has or has been approved for a current City liquor license is not required to have an additional investigation as required by this Section. 3-411-5: ISSUANCE OF LICENSE; RESTRICTIONS: The application for license required by this article, when filed, shall be referred to the city clerk who shall issue or cause to be issued to such applicant a license authorizing the keeping, conducting or operating of such amusement device, as the case may be, at the Ordinance No. 2012- Page 2 place described in such application, for and during the term of such license. A license shall not issue, however, to the following person or persons: A. A person who has been convicted of a felony under the laws of the state of Illinois; B. A person whose license issued under this article has been revoked for good cause; C. A person who, at time of application for renewal of any license issued under this article, would not be eligible for such license upon first application; D. A partnership, unless all of the members of such partnership shall be qualified to obtain a license; E. A person whose place of business is conducted by a manager or agent, unless the manager or agent possesses the same qualifications required of the licensee; F. A person who does not own the premises for such a license, unless said person has valid lease for the premises for which the license is to be issued; G. A person who has been convicted of any crime or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude. 3-4B-6: LOCATION RESTRICTIONS: A. In accordance with the provisions of the zoning ordinance of the city, under no circumstances shall a license be issued for the operation of any amusement device business unless such business is located in a B-2 general business district or B-3 service business district classification. B. No license shall be granted to any place of business under this article to operate, maintain or conduct an amusement device for the use of minors which is within three hundred feet(300) of any school or tavern. 3-411-7: HOURS OF OPERATION: All places of business licensed under this article, with the exception of those places holding liquor licenses shall be closed and kept closed each night from twelve o'clock (12:00) midnight until eight o'clock(8:00) A.M. the following morning. 3-411-8: MINORS: A. Minors Prohibited: Minors under the age of twenty one (21) shall not, under any circumstances, frequent, loiter or go or remain in a place licensed hereunder for the sale of liquor. It shall be unlawful for the proprietor or manager of such place so Ordinance No. 2012- Page 3 licensed for the sale of liquor to allow or permit these minors to frequent or loiter or remain within the premises or designated area in which said amusement devices are located. B. Manager in Attendance: Every place of business that permits minors to play amusement devices shall have in attendance, as a manager or operator of such place of business, a responsible person of good moral character, who is the age of twenty one (21) years or more." Section S. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2012. MAYOR Ordinance No. 2012- Page 4 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number .�� dt► Legal ❑❑ PW—NB #1 Finance ESL -� 1836 Engineer ■ -_� City Administrator ■ Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El� wn sw _© Community Development ❑ PW 2012-33 Parks&Recreation ■ Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Route 34 Letter of Understanding Meeting and Date: COW June 12, 2012 Synopsis: IDOT has provided a revised Letter of Understanding that includes a trail from Route 47 to Orchard Road. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approve and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Route 34 Letter of Understanding. Submitted by: Laura Schraw Parks & Recreation Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Please see the attached memo. c►ry0 Memorandum EST. lass To: Committee of the Whole From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation co CC: Brad Sanderson, EEI Bart Olson, City Administrator MMAC­V Date: June 7, 2012 Subject: Route 34 Letter of Understanding Summary One revised Letter of Understanding between the City and the State for the Route 34 expansion project east of Route 47, replacing two previously approved letters of understanding, and reducing the City's overall cost to install trails along the expansion project. Previously approved Letters of Understanding (LOUs) In 2010, a Letter of Understanding (attached)was approved by vote authorizing the Mayor to execute under agenda item PW 2010-06 stating that the City would be the lead agency in constructing a multi-use trail from Timber Ridge Road to the Yorkville City limits. At that time, IDOT was in the final design phase (Phase 2) of their Route 34 (Rt.47 to Orchard Road)project. IDOT initially assumed (during Phase 1 engineering)that the trail system would dive off into Grande Reserve and link up to a trail on Kennedy Road. Yorkville's Integrated Transportation Plan as well as the Oswego Comprehensive Plan called for a trail along all of Route 34. IDOT initially rejected the request in 2010 to include a trail extension in their project because it would require re-opening the Phase I report. Therefore IDOT proposed to help fund the trail as a separate city project and the City signed a Letter of Understanding that the City would act as the lead agency on the trail project for this segment and receive 50%reimbursement for construction costs and 15% for engineering costs. There was no cost estimate or formal timeline associated with this agreement, other than construction was not allowed to begin until after the Route 34 project was complete. In accordance with this agenda item, we estimate the cost of this section of trail to be $200,000+. This means the City's share for construction would have been more than $100,000. In 2012, a Letter of Understanding (attached)was approved by vote authorizing the Mayor to execute under agenda item PW 2010-04 outlining the City's participation in the Route 34 project from Route 47 to Orchard Road. In this agreement, the City would fund a multi-use trail for a portion of the Route 34 project from Route 47 to Timber Ridge Road. The City's share for the trail in this agreement was estimated at $42,000. New Letter of Understanding In May 2012, IDOT requested a meeting with the City of Yorkville, Kendall County, and the Village of Oswego regarding the expansion of the project to include trail the entire length of Route 34 from Route 47 in Yorkville to Orchard Road. Within this expansion project, IDOT indicated that a trail along the Timber Ridge Road section to Orchard Road would be eligible for 80/20 funding(this is the same section from the LOU in 2010, which had a 50150 funding split). Alternatives for trail construction, due to IDOT needing to acquire additional ROW to complete these improvements, were discussed, but ultimately rejected under IDOT's own standards. All agencies agreed that a 10' wide asphalt trail is preferred. . MOT needs to acquire additional ROW to include this trail segment with their Route 34 project and has requested that all agencies approve a Letter of Understanding approving their project involvement, so that they may proceed with including this trail segment in the Route 34 expansion project. Attached is a Letter of Understanding regarding the City's participation for a trail from Route 47 to Yorkville City limits. The total projected cost is $87,400 ($76,000 for construction plus 15% for engineering, estimated at $11,400). IDOT is requesting approval of this letter. Recap The City previously committed in 2010 of the trail construction from Timber Ridge Road to Yorkville City limits at 50% (this does not include right-of-way acquisition, etc.) and in 2012 committedto paying for a trail from Route 47 to Timber Ridge Road at 20% By approving the attached, revised LOU, the City's cost for the two segments of trail will be reduced from about $150,000 to $87,400. This new Letter of Understanding takes the responsibility of the trail ROW acquisition,plat recording, engineering and construction away from the City and increases the cost share from the state to 80%. Oswego and Kendall County have also received similar agreements outlining their cost participation in this project. If the City does not agree to approve this Letter of Understanding, the state has the option to proceed with the project in the other two jurisdictions and trail installation in the missing segment would be at 100% City cost. Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Highways/ Region 2/District 3 700 East Norris Drive/Ottawa, Illinois/61350-0697 Telephone 815/434-6131 January 4, 2010 The Honorable Valerie Burd Mayor of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Letter of Understanding US34 (FAP591) State Section (13C & 13)R &T Kendall County (Proposed Multi-Use Trail Along US 34, From Timber Ridge Road to Yorkville's East Limits) File No. 1432-211 Dear Mayor Burd: This letter of understanding is in response to correspondence from Yorkville City Engineer, Mr. Joe Wywrot, dated December 17, 2009 (see attachment). In his letter, Mr. Wywrot stated the city of Yorkville's willingness to assume the role of lead agency in constructing a multi-use recreational trail along US 34 from Timber Ridge Road and extending easterly approximately 0.87 mile to Yorkville's east corporate limits. This letter confirms that the IDOT, District 3 office concurs with this trail proposal and further agrees to reimburse the city accordingly. The state will reimburse the city for 50 percent of the construction cost, plus an additional 15 percent charge for preliminary and construction engineering to be applied to the state's share of cost. As lead agency, the city will be responsible for conducting any required surveys, develop plans and specifications, obtain any necessary easements and/or rights of way, receive bids, award a contract and furnish engineering inspection during construction. IDOT's consulting engineer has previously provided preliminary engineering information of the US 34 project (CADD files, plan sheets, cross sections and survey data) to Mr. Wywrot. Be advised that the state's share cost is limited to a standard 10 foot wide bituminous paved trail with 2 foot shoulders. The trail must be constructed in compliance with all the standards and specifications set by the Federal Highway Administration and [DOT. In accordance with departmental policy, all appurtenances required to facilitate proper drainage and functionality of the trail and safety to trail users are items that the state deems as being reimbursable. All landscaping exceeding standard seed and/or sod, special pavement and/or structure treatments, enhancement lighting, etc. are not reimbursable and therefore would be at 100 percent city cost. The Honorable Valerie Burd January 4, 2010 Page 2 Constructing the trail after the US 34 project is completed would be the most practical approach. IDOT's proposed reconstruction of adjoining US 34 is part of the state's multi-year program. However, the actual year of the construction work is currently unknown as the highway project is currently not funded. Due to these circumstances, the primary purpose of this letter of understanding is to serve as a confirmation between our two agencies. The city of Yorkville will assume the role of the lead agency to construct the described multi-use trail. Additionally, the state hereby commits to reimbursing the city for 50 percent cost of the trail as described above, at such time the trail is constructed. Specific scheduling in the preparation of plans and programming of funds for the trail will need to be addressed in the future when there is a greater certainty in the availability of funds. You will note that two copies of this letter of understanding are enclosed for your review. If you are in agreement with the proposals stated in this letter, please affix your signature in the space provided on both copies; retain one copy for your files and return the second copy to the Illinois Department of Transportation, District 3 office in Ottawa. Upon our receipt of the signed copy, it will be assumed the city of Yorkville concurs with the terms stated herein. A signed copy of this letter of understanding will be placed in the district's commitment file for the US 34 project for future reference. If you have any questions, feel free to contact Mr. Craig Reed of this office at (815) 434-8420. Sincerely, George F. Ryan, P.E. Deputy Director of Highways, Region Two Engineer -� � By: Dan L. Mestelle, P.E. Program Development Engineer Concurrence: The city of Yorkville concurs with the terms of this letter of understanding 1/19 do -, �t� i/agJ�fl Valerie Burd, Mayor of Yorkville Date cc: Joseph Wywrot, City Engineer Bart Olson, City Administrator Illinois Qepartrilmt of Transportation Division of Highways/Region 2/District 3 700 East Norris Drive f Ottawa, Illinois/61350-1628 Telephone 8151434-6131 October 11, 2011 The Honorable Gary Golinski Mayor of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Letter of Understanding FAP 591 (US 34) Section (13C&13)R&T Kendall County US 34 (From East of IL 47 West of Orchard Road) Local Agency Cost Sharing Dear Mayor Golinski: This letter of understanding is the result of communication between the city of Yorkville and the Illinois Department of Transportation concerning IDOT's proposed widening of US Route 34 from approximately 350 feet west of Marketplace Drive and extending 3.6 miles to approximately 350 feet west of Orchard Road, in Oswego. IDOT and Yorkville city staff have met on various occasions to discuss the scope of work and the share of cost which will be required from the city of Yorkville. The city of Yorkville also reviewed preliminary plans provided on June 4, 2010 and pre-final plans provided on June 13, 2011 itemizing City participation items. The purpose of this letter is to provide a clear understanding of the estimated cost the City is to incur and to provide direction to complete final plans which are currently 90% complete. The City's signature of this letter represents Yorkville's commitment to the project. The list below describes some preliminary pay items which require City participation. The city and state will enter into a formal agreement prior to beginning construction which will detail the city's share of cost. The total project cost is estimated at $27.5 million in 2011 dollars. The Department has estimated the following preliminary local participation costs for the city of Yorkville: 1. Sidewalk—20% local cost $ 4,600 2. Shared-Use Path (10'wide bituminous)—20% local cost $42,000 3. Combined Road Lighting at 5 Intersections— 100% local cost $58,000 4. Pre-emption devices at 5 Intersections— 100% local cost $20,000 5. City Utilities (water/sewer) — 100% local cost $20,000 6. Traffic Signals (4 @ 6.6%, 1 @ 10% local share) $55,600 7. Engineering — 15% $30,000 Total estimated cost share for the City of Yorkville $230,200 The Honorable Gary Golinski Page 2 October 11, 2011 Final costs will be based on actual bid prices after the project has been let for construction. This project is currently not scheduled for construction in the Department's FY 2012-2017 Proposed Highway Improvement Program, but will be monitored for inclusion based on project readiness and funding availability. Based on the current schedule and pending land acquisition, this project would be available for letting no sooner than FY 2014. You will note two copies of this letter of understanding are enclosed for your review. If you agree with this proposal, please affix your original signature in the space provided on both copies, retain one for your files and return the second copy to this office by November 28, 2011. If the signed letter of understanding is not received by this date, we will proceed with final plans based on comments received from the City on the pre-final plans. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Mr. Craig Reed, Project Engineer at (815) 434-8420. Sincerely, Eric S. Therkildsen, P.E. Acting Deputy Director of Highways, Region Two Engineer S By: Dan Mestelle, P.E. District Program Development Engineer CR:lw/cr 10-11-11 Letter of Understanding Yorkville cc: Lou Paukovitz APPROVED: lLea&- I .3�_ ary oli ski Date York Ile Mayor FAP 591 (US Route 34) Section (13C&13)R&T Kendall County C-93-016-10 Contract 66884 Work Item Total Cost Federal State City Mainline US 34 Roadway construction $20,929,000 $16,743,200 $4,185,800 $0 (widening two to five lanes) including curb and gutter storm sewer Also, all work Required on local street connections Traffic Signals: US 34 @ McHugh Road $200,000 $160,000 $20,000 $20,000 (80%) (10%) (10%) Combination Roadway Lighting $14,000 $0 $0 $14,000 (100%) Traffic Signals: US 34 @ Marketplace $135,000 $108,000 $18,090 $8,910 Drive (80°/0') (13.4%) (6.6%) Combination Roadway Lighting $11,000 $0 $0 $11;000 (10.0%) Traffic Signals: US 34 @ Countryside $135,000 $108,000 $18,090 $8,910 Parkway (80%) (13.4%) (6.6%) Combination Roadway Lighting $11,000 $0 $0 $11,000 (100%) Traffic Signals. US 34 @ Autumn Greek $135,000 $108,000 $18,000 $8,910 Drive (800/6) (13 4%) (6-6%) Combination Roadway Lighting $11,000 $0 $0 $11,000 (1000/0) Traffic Signals: US 34 @ Bristol Ridge $135,000 $108,000 $18,090 $8,910 Drive (80%) (13.4%) (6.6%) Combination Roadway Lighting $11,000 $0 $0 $11,000 (100%) Optional Emergency Pre-Emption $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 Units at 5 Intersections, Total 10 (100%) Units, Elected by the City New Elective 5' Concrete $23,000 $18,400 $0 $4,600 Sidewalk (Where None Currently (80%) (20%) Exists) Work Item Total Cost Federal State City Elective to Wide Hot Mix Asphalt $210,000 $168,000 $0 $42,000 10' Shared Use Trail (80%) (20%) City Water Main & Sanitary Sewer $20,000 $0 $0 $20,000 Related Items (100%) Subtotals $22,000,000 $17,521,600 $4,278,160 $200,240 Preliminary & Construction $3,300;000 $2,628,240 $641,724 $30,036 Engineering @ 15% Land Acquisition $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 Utilities $200.000 $0 $200,000 $0 Grand Total $27,500,000 $20,149,840 $7,119,884 $230,276 Cost to City $230,276 Say $230,000 CR:Iw/cr 7-22-11 Agreement US 34 66884 Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Highways/ Region 2/ District 3 700 East Norris Drive/Ottawa, Illinois/61350-1628 Telephone 815/434-6131 May 2, 2012 Mr. Bart Olson, City Administrator City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Resolution of Intent U.S. 34 (FAP 591) (Proposed Shared Use Trail Between IL 47 and Orchard Road) Kendall County Contract#66884 Dear Mr. Olson. Attached for review and execution by the Yorkville City Council are two copies of a Resolution of Intent relating to the proposed shared use trail to be constructed along the north side of U.S. 34 between IL 47 in Yorkville to Orchard Road in the village of Oswego. On April 23, 2012, representatives of Oswego, Yorkville and Kendall County met with IDOT staff at the IDOT District 3 office. Laura Schraw and Brad Sanderson represented Yorkville at the meeting. Focus of discussion was the proposed construction of a 10 foot wide bituminous shared use path. Such a path would involve the participation of the three local agencies. All local government attendees favored the proposed trail which requires a 20 percent local share of cost for construction and local agencies committing to all future maintenance of the facility. Consequently, IDOT has prepared a Resolution of Intent for each respective administration to formally commit to funding and maintaining the shared use trail. A written commitment from the local agencies is required before the state can proceed with acquiring the needed added rights of way and assuming the expense of integrating the said trail into the highway design plans. Please review the terms of the resolution. If your officials agree to the content of the resolution, please return one of the two enclosed copies to the IDOT District 3 office in Ottawa, with the required original signatures. If you have any questions or concerns about the resolution, feel free to contact Lou Paukovitz of this office at(815) 434-8473 or Louis.Paukovitza-Illinois.gov. Your assistance in this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, Eric S. Therkildsen, P.E. Acting Deputy Director of Highways, Region Two Engineer 0, P. s By: Dan L. Mestelle, P.E. Program Development Engineer cc: Brad Sanderson Laura Schraw UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF INTENT U.S. 34: BETWEEN ILLINOIS 47 IN YORKVILLE AND ORCHARD ROAD IN OSWEGO WHEREAS, this Resolution of Intent is entered into by and between the State of Illinois, through its Department of Transportation, hereinafter called the STATE and the United City of Yorkville, hereinafter called the CITY. WHEREAS, the STATE, proposes to reconstruct U.S. 34 (FAP 591), beginning at a point located approximately 900 feet east of Illinois 47 within the city of Yorkville, and extending northeasterly 3.54 miles to Station Drive located approximately 300 feet west of Orchard Road (Kendall County Highway 9A) within the village of Oswego. See location map attached as Exhibit#1. The said project is identified under State Section (13C & 13)R &T, Contract No. 66884. The project's scope of work is primarily to reconstruct the existing two lane highway into a four to five lane curb and gutter urban type roadway, consisting of two through lanes for each direction of traffic and auxiliary turn lanes at various locations. This project is currently funded within the STATE's FY 2013- 2018 program. WHEREAS, in accordance with STATE policies, the option of providing pedestrian and cycling accommodations alongside the same segment of U.S. 34 are to be given consideration by both the STATE and local government agencies that adjoin the road project. The STATE shall assume all rights of way costs for the pedestrian/cycling accommodations. Construction cost for the said trail is to be at an 80 percent STATE and 20 percent local share of cost. WHEREAS, the primary purpose of this Resolution of Intent is to secure commitments from all involved local agencies to assure a continued and complete shared use trail along U.S. Route 34, from Illinois 47 in Yorkville to Orchard Road in Oswego. WHEREAS, on April 23, 2012, representatives of the city of Yorkville, village of Oswego, Kendall County and the Kendall County Forest Preserve District met with STATE officials at the Illinois Department of Transportation, District 3 office in Ottawa, Illinois, at which time a shared use trail along U.S. 34 for bicycle/pedestrian use was discussed. All parties agreed to participate in funding the construction of an "Alternate#1" version of shared use trail presented at the meeting. Alternate #1 consists of constructing a 10 foot wide bituminous surface trail along the north side of U.S. 34. (See proposed typical section of Alternate#1 trail attached as Exhibit#2). Further, each local agency agreed to provide 20 percent of the cost and provide future maintenance of only those portions of the said trail that is located within their respective jurisdictions. The majority of the proposed shared use trail is to be 10 feet wide and have a bituminous surface. The trail's width may vary to 8 feet wide at some isolated locations due to physical limitations and/or extending circumstances. WHEREAS, there exists a need for the STATE to obtain written commitments from local governmental agencies so to determine the extent of the shared use trail that is to be constructed. The STATE will not proceed with the expense of acquiring added right of way and/or incorporating the design of a shared use trail into the project plans until local agencies commit to assuming 20 percent of the trail's construction cost and assuming future full maintenance of the said trail following its completion of its construction. Consequently, Resolutions of Intent with the same provisions are being submitted to all affected local agencies that adjoin the proposed U.S. 34 project. WHEREAS, of the total 3.54 miles of project distance, the CITY has agreed to assume responsibility of shared use trail from the west terminus of the project (900 feet east of Illinois 47) and extending easterly 2.76 miles to the CITY's east corporate limits. The CITY's participation commitment also includes those existing unincorporated areas that are technically outside and inter-dispersed between the corporate limits of Yorkville. The CITY will assume 20 percent share of shared use trail construction cost to be built along the north side of U.S. 34 and provide or cause to provide full maintenance of the completed trail from the west terminus of the project located 900 feet east of Illinois 47 easterly 2.80 miles to the city's east corporate limits. The CITY's estimated cost for the trail is $76,000 plus 15 percent additional charge for preliminary and construction engineering. Final costs will be based on actual bid unit process of the awarded contract. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution of Intent, the United City of Yorkville, Illinois by action taken here, agrees to assume 20 percent construction cost and provide or cause to provide all future maintenance of the described bituminous surface shared use trail along the entire north side of U.S. 34 from the west terminus of the project near Market Place Drive easterly 2.76 miles to the CITY's east corporate limits. The CITY further agrees that should the CITY later reverse its decision and not participate in the shared use trail, the CITY will remain obligated to reimburse the STATE for all the local 20 percent share of engineering and right of way costs the STATE had incurred in designing the shared use trail. The CITY further agrees to later enter into a formal agreement with the STATE within the STATE's fiscal year when the subject U.S. 34 project is to be constructed. Final design plans and updated cost estimates of the shared use trail will be provided to the CITY at the time of the formal agreement. The CITY is hereby directed to transmit one copy of this Resolution of Intent with the necessary original signatures and certification seals to the STATE through its Deputy Director of Highways at the Illinois Department of Transportation, District 3 Office, 700 E. Norris Drive in Ottawa, Illinois, 61350. (SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE) Passed and approved by the United City of Yorkville City Council this day of , 2012. APPROVED ATTEST Gary Golinski, Mayor Beth Warren, City Clerk Date EXHIBIT #1 i' .w' To,tiiwr,XLEV R 7 E R IL'FAP749 KANE r rrrr r t?ASEL•NE ° I �. LOCATION MAP NA 47 .... w I Mon U.S. 34 (FAP 591) Pop. STATE SECTION (13C & 13) R&T �► KENDAL ENTIRE LENGTH OF PROJECT "•"•.� L COUNTY #' IS 3.54 MILES FROM A POINT i s'� j, ,•'`�� 900 FT. EAST OF ILLINOIS 47 E IN YORKVILLE EASTERLY TO '�` ' ' •4• �•-••�'r �� ��, s STATION ST., LOCATED 300 FT. ' Oswego EAST OF ORCHARD ROAD POP,29.012 6LS.' (COUNTY HWY. 9A) IN OSWEGO ,• 'r} w ca • t1:' S � .J.a `'� � t � ?,• `• •. �541 ►•, • ' r •., ,•10 �s,•Er_ �• 71 .... %+ r 34 • «. 211 or Ile 5g - ..... pa w COLLINS • - r r[s?, • rr�f. �` r • ...••� .24 24 VAN EhVM4N q . ... !. • k 16 +t RESERVAo TI N !- �'• 1 1' M I[ .i. , w. fit/ r ....}....,w._........,...�....... + .: r qjr tir 47 t 126 —�— CL •,n . 3 CEG01 •Q i ! i Y u. s 2. j �,h1ENT RD ` \ GALES LN --"-j KNEELER RD it . 1159 �— I - r � L =I 11ALKER i , �� �i RD !� J EXHIBIT #2 w zU) aw °Q L-Li viii �> a: U) �.- wz J Q o � z � o 0-y W Il- Ln O } U/ + uj Dom. Ln _ I � w F— z = Q. _j mcc: I � Q V) � w Q w � 0- U O w a m 0 � U. cO W _1 Lai.N i9 F— Y p a vii vwi w� p m + a� a:of vi LL1 O �a =° a o 0 o O ry r--� O > L 07 Ow 0 ' ^ w a !� LLJ w �Q N� 0X Q Q 0 unU ow z V7 > X O Q�w w J a-L/) w o z0 [ `v 00 LLJ 1 U 11' ----------------------------- 2 E]w J� =MUJ oo OZ w J °Q w inOU wozaw OwO'N� wEa �n i �aU�o 0wooQ:� ,-L 0�-i cl�U EXHIBIT #2 W r Z un a~ o� oQ U O� - CC Vi ! a- D - I J Q o � z F-- 0 � I oQ y °�° = N l z LLJ f` o � Ln + a LU wLn o Ln V) J - z = Q oz = = t (n Q. LLJ LLJ Ln ) o W m ti- t --� U_ >- W J LL- �� Y o V)0 W� U 0 m cr W Q Ln LLJ O O C-0 D O Q L) 12 O � 4 Q O j i z o w V) LLJ z2 2 I W 0 Q I—Q N 0- Q �Lj 0'Q V)U O LLJ V cr > X O �W �V) C�Z W J LLJ N P W o a_ Q -- - -- Q O u .t CC n J f �U I _---------- ----------------•-- M 2 a w LLJ Qom`" n > z L� O •o o<- -F- `` UlUU WozQLLJ 0 LLJ 0 t-/)ps-! W=)Q Vi C)�O U 3.1 O OWOOCI' J Of U I � Ii 1 `� 13 fry Reviewed By: J� 0 Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ PW—NB #2 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ PW 2012-34 AL E ��' Police F-1 Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Countryside Center Road Maintenance and Snow Plowing Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Discussion of road maintenance and snow plowing in Countryside Center, in front of Northwest Pool and Spa. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Alderman Gilson Name Department Agenda Item Notes: [City Administrator's Note] This is a private road. Bank of America's management company was reviewing quotes for asphalt patching this week, and weighing those against whether they will patch the road or close the road. . . . y , . . . V I Z� + 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number .�� dt► Legal ❑ PW—NB #3 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ■ -_� City Administrator E] Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El� wn sw _© Community Development ❑ PW 2012-35 � Police F-1 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: 2012 MFT Maintenance Program Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Consideration of Resolution Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: CI's. _ 0 Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator EST -� 1836 From: Brad Sanderson, EEI Director of Public Works 0 1,1 CC: Eric Dhuse, •.. p Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk ALE �►"�• Date: June 4, 2012 Subject: 2012 MFT Maintenance Program In accordance with the approved budget, we are planning on proceeding with this year's MFT Maintenance Program. This year's program will consist of miscellaneous patching and is planned to occur on Kennedy Road as shown in the attached exhibit. The budgeted amount for this year's program is $50,000. Since the budgeted amount is relatively small, it is more cost- effective to keep the work confined to one general work area. Attached please find a copy of the proposed MFT appropriation resolution in the amount of $50,000. If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know. 2012 MFT STREET MAINTENANCE PROJECT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS JUNE 2012 r� CID co f i ILA R�' I� Q O U O J F- L� KENNEDY ROAD r 0 o 0 0 Z N D �I J �v O N T m 0 1" = 1,000' 47 117 C] O. LOCATION MAP o 0 N 0 N � O N O Ir- ° Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Y > Consulting Engineers o 0 g 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove,Illinois 60554 630/466-6700 PROJECT NO: Y01219 ° COPYRIGHT © 2012 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. FILE N0: Y0120061 E � !jW Illinois Department Resolution for Maintenance of elm Streets and Highways by Municipality Of Transportation Under the Illinois Highway Code BE IT RESOLVED, by the CITY COUNCIL of the (Council eF PFesidlent Q and .�aFd of TFUrSte G) UNITED CITY of YORKVILLE y✓V V V , Illinois, that there is hereby (City,TewR OF Village) (Name) appropriated the sum of $50,000 of Motor Fuel Tax funds for the purpose of maintaining streets and highways under the applicable provisions of the Illinois Highway Code from MAY 1, 2012 (Date) to APRIL 30, 2013 (Date) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that only those streets, highways, and operations as listed and described on the approved Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs, including supplemental or revised estimates approved in connection with this resolution, are eligible for maintenance with Motor Fuel Tax funds during the period as specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall, as soon a practicable after the close of the period as given above, submit to the Department of Transportation, on forms furnished by said Department , a certified statement showing expenditures from and balances remaining in the account(s) for this period; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall immediately transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the district office of the Department of Transportation, at OTTAWA , Illinois. I, BETH WARREN Clerk in and for the UNITED CITY (City,Town eF Village) of YORKVILLE , County of KENDALL hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the CITY COUNCIL at a meeting on JUNE 19, 2012 (Council eF PFesi ent and BE)aFd„t T'ustees) Date IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 19TH day of JUNE, 2012 (SEAL) CITY Clerk (CityVillage) Approved Date Department of Transportation Regional Engineer Printed 5/24/2012 BLR 14230(Rev. 11/06) 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number .�� dt► Legal ❑ PW—NB #4 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ -_� City Administrator ■ Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El� wn sw _© Community Development ❑ PW 2012-36 Parks&Recreation Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Parkway Tree Installation—Vendor Proposal Meeting and Date: COW June 12, 2012 Synopsis: The original Parkway Tree Program was sold out as of May 10, 2012. A second option for providing parkway trees to residents at a reduced cost is attached. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approve staff to prepare materials and offer the alternative Tree Planting Program to residents. Submitted by: Laura Schraw Parks & Recreation Name Department Agenda Item Notes: c►ry0 Memorandum EST. 1ss6 To: Committee of the Whole Bart Olson, City Administrator OX11 ft co From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks & Recreation C—tV �4 CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Date: June 7, 2012 Subject: Alternative Tree Planting Program Summary The 36 trees allocated for the 50150 Parkway Tree Planting Program were sold as of May 10, 2012. The number of trees that were allotted for the program was based on the availability of manpower from the Public Works and Parks departments at the time of planting in the fall. Staff has contacted local companies to obtain estimates for installing parkway trees so that City Council can decide if they would like to offer a secondary program for residents that still desire to have a parkway tree installed prior to our program opening again next spring. In this program the cost of the tree and installation would be paid for by the homeowner. Estimates The following estimates were provided: Tree delivery charge from nursery= $125/load(20 trees= $6.25/tree) Montgomery Landscaping planting charge = $120/tree (does not include watering) Brockway Landscaping planting charge = $160/tree (includes watering) Yorkville Hill Landscaping planting charge = $77.80/tree (includes watering) Based on the lowest price provided and including a delivery charge, the total cost for delivery and installation will be approximately$84.05 per tree. Local nurseries were contacted and the following species are available for fall (prices are from our existing program): Elms = $140 Honeylocust= $142 Linden= $157 Kentucky Coffeetree= $143 Red Maples are the most popular selection (and the cheapest at $108)but one nursery says they can be dug in the fall while another says they can't. The City cannot guarantee there will be enough trees available if the nursery does not have the option to dig for trees in the fall. If the Red Maple is sensitive to fall digging, since we do not offer a warranty for our tree program, it is in the best interest to not offer these trees in case they die. If the Council feels that choice is up to the resident, we will offer Red Maples at $108/tree. Program An alternative tree planting program, if provided, would charge the resident the price of the tree plus $84.05 for planting, mulching and watering once. Total prices per tree would range from $225.05 to $241.05 depending on the species selected. Another option for residents that can be offered by the City is the iTrees program where residents can order their own trees through the website www.itrees.com. Additional information is attached, and a 10% discount can be given to Yorkville residents that order their trees online, and for every 10 trees ordered the City would receive 1 free tree to plant where they choose. C-,I ommuni Spring Grove Nursery & iTrees.com are proud to introduce our new CommuniTrees Partner Program available to communities across Illinois. With a commitment to growing& protecting the urban forest canopy in our landscape, we have partnered together to offer a unique opportunity to communities &their residents. Our innovative program can compliment an exisiting residential tree planting program or it can be the single solution to adding more trees to your community. Either way,this specially designed program can be implemented without any extra cost or hassle to your municipal budget or staff! Here's how it works: CHOOSE TREES Residents can shop for trees at www.lTrees.com where they can select their trees & purchase them online. The residents can choose to either have their trees delivered or planted. Your city or village offers residents a discount code that they may use at iTrees.com to receive a 10-15%discount off their purchase.The entire transaction occurs between iTrees.com &the resident;the municipality does not need to be involved. PLANT TREES Next, iTrees.com shows up to deliver or plant the trees for your residents. All of the trees will come from our locally grown farm at Spring Grove Nursery. Our trees are all top quality, and we are committed to providing a diverse & superior selection of trees to choose from. The trees range in size from 2.0"-4.0" in caliper and come balled & burlapped. FREE TREES! As an extra bonus to your community, Spring Grove Nursery will donate to your municipality 1 free tree for every 10 trees purchased by residents through this program. These trees can be planted anywhere in your community — along a street, in a park, etc. The trees will be delivered free of charge to one location, and your village crews can handle the planting. Hopefully, this incentive will encourage residents to purchase their trees through this program to further help beautify their community! ENJOY YOUR TREES! This is the best part— newly trees planted throughout your community go to work improving your environment! It's that easy! With shrinking municipal budgets and understaffed Public Works Departments,we know how hard it is to facilitate a community tree planting program on private property. We think that this unique partnership between the grower,the municipality,the online store, & the resident creates a great opportunity to simply & affordably get more trees out into the landscape at no extra hassle to the municipality. In addition to great trees&service,we can also provide marketing resources to help get the word out in your commu- nity about the program. Please contact Spring Grove Nursery at 815.448.2097 for more info about how your community can get started today! COMMUM To find out more about us, please call or visit our websites at: Spring Grove Nursery, Inc. 815.448.2097 1 www.SpringGroveNursery.com Our nursery is located in North Central Illinois just south of the Chicago suburbs. For five generations,our family has cultivated &crafted strong roots in agriculture.Our trees grow on 90 acres of some of the Midwest's finest fertile soil,and we have a strong SPRING GROVE NURSERY,INC. commitment to conservation,quality,&service. We are confident that our nursery can provide your community with the trees, knowledge,&service that you need to successfully grow your urban forest. The nursery is owned by Becky&Jamie Thomas. iTrees.com 815.448.2138 1 www.iTrees.com 1 iTrees.com is a whole new concept designed to provide homeowners with an innovative new solution for their home tree Xom planting needs.We focus on providing the absolute highest quality,locally grown trees to homeowners,with all of the ease and C H I C A G O L A N D convenience you find in today's world.You can be sure that iTrees.com will provide you with the best product,at the best prices, with the best service. iTrees.com is owned by Chris Harford. The benefits of trees to a community are endless - here are just a few highlights: 49 1 tree reduces storm water runoff by over 4,000 gl/year 1 100 trees remove 5 tons of CO2 for the atmosphere each year 09 Healthy trees can increase property values by an average of 10% Trees provides habitat for birds, mammals, & insects l�Trees help reduce flooding by reducing runoff Through photosynthesis, in 1 day an average tree can provide enough oxygen for a family of 4 for that day Trees help protect us from wind & sun, reducing our need to heat& cool our buildings 1 , Trees in business districts have a positive effect on shoppers' behaviors 1�Neighborhoods with more trees have been shown to have a lower crime rate 1►�Trees make people feel better — both physically & mentally Trees planted along highways & city streets have been shown to help reduce drivers' stress &to reduce speeds Straight from the grower's field into your urban landscape, our trees can get to work right away making your community a more beautiful & healthy place to live!Through the Communitrees Partner Program your residents can choose from a diverse list of trees species like State Street Maple,Yellow Buckeye, Pyramidal European Hornbeam, Eastern Redbud,Yellowwood, Honeylocust, Hack- berry, Ginkgo, Kentucky Coffee Tree, Sweetgum, Tulip Tree, Dawn Redwood, London Planetree, Quaking Aspen, Bur Oak, Regal Prince Oak, Bald Cypress, Hybrid Elms, Silver Linden, etc... and many more! By offering a diverse &superior selection of trees,you can rest assured that your urban forest canopy will grow&flourish for many years to come! Commufn Cbtiiii IIIIII iui 1111111111 iitrees PARTNER PROGRAM Plant some GREEN in your community! The City of Yorkville is going GREEN &announcing a new program to plant trees right here in our community! We are joining with local partners Spring Grove Nursery & iTrees.com to offer residents of Yorkville a convenient way to beautify our local landscape. Here's how it works: 1. Shop for trees at www.iTrees.com. You can select trees for your private property & purchase them directly online. (Make sure to use the discount code YORKVILLE to receive a 10% discount on your purchase!) You can choose from a diverse &superior selection of locally grown trees, and include options for either delivery or full service planting. Please note: If you would like to purchase a tree for your parkway, you will need to first contact the village. 2. Soon after your purchase, your locally grown tree will be planted or delivered by iTrees.com professionals. 3. In addition to the iTrees.com discounts for residents, Spring Grove Nursery will also offer free trees to the village. For every 10 trees purchased by residents through this program, the Village will earn a free tree! These trees will be planted in our community along streets & in parks. 4. Finally, enjoy the benefits of our newly planted trees – it's that easy! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Trees provide countless social, economic, & environmental benefits to our community. Here are just a few: • 1 Tree reduces storm water runoff by over 4,000 gls per year. • 100 trees remove 5 tons of CO2 from the atmosphere per year. ; • Healthy trees can increase property values by an average of 10%. ; • Trees provide habitat for birds, mammals, & insects. ; • Trees help reduce flooding by reducing runoff. • Through photosynthesis, in 1 day an average tree can provide enough oxygen for a family of 4 for that day. • Neighborhoods with more trees have been shown to have a lower crime rate. ; : Trees help people feel better– both mentally & physically. ; • "Trees properly placed around buildings can reduce air conditioning needs by 30 percent and can save 20 - 50 ; percent in energy used for heating."—USDA Forest Service • ... And the list goes on! •. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : We invite you to join us and leave a GREEN LEGACY in our community to be enjoyed for future generations! To get started, visit www.iTrees.com today or call 815.448.2138! Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number Legal Finance PW—OB #1 E] EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number Human Resources ❑ `=Q Community Development F-1 PW 2012-31 Police ALE � Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: LOC/Bond Call Policy Meeting and Date: COW/June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Analysis of current LOC/Bond regulations and proposal of new strategies, policies &procedures for future LOC/Bond calls. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: N/A Item Number: N/A Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Recommendation Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum. Cpl 0 Memorandum EST. 1836 To: Committee of the Whole --� From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director '{ CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator t ®► Brad Sanderson, EEI kE 1 Date: May 24, 2012 Subject: Existing & Proposed Bond Policies for Subdivision Developments Background& Purpose At the May 15th Public Works Committee meeting, staff provided, in the attached memorandum, a brief overview of the existing bonds and letters of credit currently held by the City, as well as proposed strategies, policies and procedures for future tracking of bonds/letters of credit(LOC)used as security for new development. Currently, the City of Yorkville has approximately 150 bonds and/or letter of credit (LOC) in place for 54 existing development projects in various phases of completion. Chapter 5: Required Improvements within the City's Subdivision Control Ordinance establishes regulations for how security instruments, such as bonds and letters of credit, are to be administered. This is in addition to, Resolution 2004-39 which sets the Standard Specifications for Improvements related to construction. However, major discrepancies exist within these two regulating documents with regards to the required date for construction completion and trigger for acceptance of infrastructure. Further, there is the question of the enforceability of the Standard Specifications for Improvement requirements in a resolution versus the regulations in the Subdivision Control Ordinance (refer to attached memo to Public Works Committee dated 5-11-12). Staff is seeking specific direction from the Committee of the Whole with regards to the following policy discussion items outlined in further detail within the body of this memorandum: (1) maximum completion time of subdivision improvements, (2) authorization to grant extensions for completion of improvements, (3) fee requirement for extension requests, (4) deadline for final road surface course installation, and (5) trigger for initial contact by staff and potential bond call for subdivisions behind on construction completion schedule. Updated Proposed Strategies,Procedures and Polices Below is a summary of those proposed policy and procedures as discussed and recommended by the Public Works Committee, as well as additional requested research. If the Committee of the Whole finds the proposed bond policies favorable, a draft ordinance amending the Subdivision Control Ordinance to reflect those changes will be presented at an upcoming City Council meeting for consideration. I. Revise Subdivision Control Ordinance to require completion of Subdivision within 4 years of from final plat approval. a. Revise the inconsistency/disconnect between the Standard Specifications for Improvements requirements for acceptance and roadway construction to reflect the proposed new Subdivision Control Ordinance requirements for completion of all improvements within four(4)years from the date of approval of the final plat. ➢ There was discussion between the Public Works Committee members regarding a three (3) year maximum for completion of all improvements versus the proposed four(4)year maximum for completion. 1 b. Clarify the distinction between "final plan" in Section 11-5-1 and "final plat" in Section 11-5-5 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance by referencing the "final engineering plan" and"final subdivision plat",respectively. c. Amend the Subdivision Control Ordinance to provide that "the failure to complete any infrastructure component is a violation of the code if such incomplete component may result in the harm to the system or potential failure of the system. d. Extensions may be requested by the Developer and approved by the City Council upon recommendation by the City Engineer and Public Works Director. e. Extensions granted for no more than 1 year at a time and require: (1) submittal of a revised construction schedule, (2) updated engineers estimate of probable cost for completion and(3)updated LOC or Bond with revised amounts. f. Require an application fee for construction extension requests. ➢ The Public Works Committee requested that staff research other communities which charge an application fee for construction extension requests. While staff was not able to find any local municipalities which require an application or charge a fee for such requests, we were able to find examples of communities in other counties and states. ➢ The range for application fees for construction extensions were either no cost or ranged in amount between $150.00 and $300.00. Staff is looking to use the fee as a deterrent to discourage requests for construction completion extensions, and proposes an application fee$500.00. g. Revise the current Subdivision Control regulations to require roadways and final surface course be installed no later than three(3) construction years of initial construction date. ➢ It was the consensus of staff and the Public Works Committee to require the final surface course, rather than binder course, be installed no later than three (3) construction years, rather than calendar years, of the initial construction date. H. Revise Subdivision Control Ordinance to require "Acknowledgement of Public Improvement Completion Schedule" a. Schedule outlines when the public improvements are to be completed and signed by the City&Developer. b. Schedule states the City will place as a condition in the Final Plat of Subdivision approval Ordinance or PUD Agreement Ordinance that the development must have all streets, sewers, water mains, street lights, etc... installed in a workmanship like manner within 4 years of initial construction. c. Schedule will require the developer provide proof via a title search that all accepted infrastructure is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. d. Schedule states the developer will maintain the public improvements until they are approved and accepted by the City. III. Quarterly tracking of Letters of Credits and Bonds re:Expiration Dates a. Projects nearing 2 years into construction will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer and require an updated Public Improvement Completion(PIC) Schedule. 2 b. Projects nearing 3 years into construction will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer with punchlist and require an updated PIC Schedule. c. Projects nearing 4 years into construction will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer with punchlist,require an updated PIC Schedule and formal notification that the project will be in default if an extension is not requested/approved prior to 4 year construction deadline. d. Projects over 4 years into construction will receive formal notification of default from City Engineer, at the City council direction, indicating that the LOC or Bond is subject to a demand for call within sixty (60) days of date of notice should the developer not seek an extension for completion. ➢ It was the consensus of staff and the Public Works Committee to not link a percentage built out, by either units constructed or infrastructure accepted, as originally proposed to "trigger"formal contact by the City requiring updated PIC Schedules or notification of default. IV. Revise Section I1-5-2 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance re: Contingency Requirement and Reduction of Bond Procedures • Increase the contingency requirement from ten percent (10%) to twenty percent (20%) contingency of the required improvements, as estimated by the engineer employed by the subdivider and approved by the city engineer, to assure the satisfactory installation of required improvements. • Codify the currently practiced reduction and release of letter of credit/bonds procedures as part of the partial or final acceptance process for subdivision improvements. Summary& Staff Requests It is staff's position that the implementation of the proposed amendments to the Subdivision Control Ordinance will allow for better tracking of development construction within the City, and a less subjective process for calling of bonds/LOCs. Therefore, staff is seeking overall concurrence from the Committee of the Whole regarding the strategies, procedures and policies proposed in the memorandum, and specific direction on the following four(4)items: 1. Should the completion of Subdivision Improvements occur within three (3)years or four(4)years from final plat approval? 2. Is the staff recommended application fee for construction extension requests of$500.00 sufficient enough to cover administrative costs and adequate enough to act as a deterrent? 3. Is the requirement for final surface course to be installed no later than three (3) construction years,rather than calendar years, of the initial construction date appropriate? 4. Whether or not the percentage built out,by either units constructed or infrastructure accepted, be considered as part of the "trigger" to initiating formal contact by the City requesting an updated PIC schedule or notification of default. 3 Memorandum EST. 1836 To: Public Works Committee --� From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director '{ CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator a= �► Brad Sanderson, EEI kE 1� Date: May 11, 2012 Subject: Existing & Proposed Bond Policies for Subdivision Developments Background/Purpose Per the direction of the Public Works Committee for staff to provide an overview and status update of the existing bonds and letters of credit currently held by the City, staff has prepared the following summary and proposed strategies,policies and procedures to be discussed in an effort to ensure the future timeliness of development and sufficiently prepare the City should we need to seek recourse for incomplete public infrastructure secured by these performance bonds or letters or credit. What is a Performance Bond? Simply stated, performance bonds are instruments of security used by contractors/developers to guarantee the work performed will be completed as specified by the governmental agency approving(and eventually accepting) the public and private improvements. The public improvements typically covered by a performance bond include: streets, walkways, utilities, lighting, grading, sediment and erosion control, stormwater basins, landscaping, and other construction-related items critical to developing any large-sized subdivision project. Supplemental "maintenance" or "warranty" bonds may be required for one-year following the completion and acceptance of the improvements, to further secure against defective work, labor and/or materials. How Performance Bonds are Used to Secure Developments Surety companies extend "coverage" in the form of a bond, to a contractor/developer ("principal") enabling them to enter into an agreement with a governmental agency ("obligee") guaranteeing the completion of the subdivision project. The provisions of the contract are, in general, contained within the language of the performance bond itself, and include some of the following components: • Name of the Surety Company,Principal and Obligee • Date of Bond Issuance • Bond Amount(Penal Sum) • Scope of Work to be Performed • Term or Period for Completion of Work • Provisions and/or Conditions for Default Should the"principal" default on completing the bonded improvements, either by failing to finish within the time specified or not performing the work in a manner as required by the subdivision control ordinance, the bond allows for the "obligee" to pursue the surety company to perform or fund the completion of the improvements up to the secured amount. Bonds vs. Letter of Credits (LOCs) The primary difference between a bond and a letter of credit (LOC) is insurance vs. credit. A surety company(insurance broker) issues a"bond", while a financial institution(bank)provides letters of credit. The fee, or premium, of a bond is a percentage of the total bonded amount, typically ranging between one- and five-percent of the penal sum. A letter of credit (LOC) is a secure line of funds, up to the specified amount, guaranteed by the financial institution to be made payable should the terms of the agreement not be met. Letters of credit are based on creditworthiness and typically require some form of security by the developer. The principal of the bond is guaranteeing the work to be performed,thereby the surety anticipates little to no exposure for payment'. With letters of credit, the bank has set aside secured funds as a guarantee of payment should a default occur; the higher the amount guaranteed by the bank, the higher the fee to the developer. Based on this premise, a letter of credit (LOC) is easier to collect than a bond. However, Illinois statues allow for the developer to choose which form of security, bonds or letter of credit,to guarantee subdivision improvements (65 ILCS 5111-39-3). Existing Bonds/LOC Assessment& Status Currently, the City of Yorkville has approximately 150 bonds and/or letter of credit (LOC) in place for 54 existing g evelopment projects in various phases of completion(see attached). It is customary to have multiple bonds for a single development project, as each bond covers a specific type of improvement or group of improvements within a specific phase of construction. While most bonds/LOCs are for unfinished developments, some projects have been completed or are in their"maintenance"period. Staff has reviewed and analyzed the bonds/LOCs currently held by the City and created a "risk assessment" rating system by development based upon the probability of default and reasonableness for demand of call due to the date of bond expiration, developer activity and percent (%) built-out. A fully- detailed report, by subdivision, of these findings will be provided to the City Council in a forthcoming memo to be presented at an upcoming meeting during executive session. Current Subdivision Control Ordinance Requirements The City's Subdivision Control Ordinance establishes regulations for how security instruments, such as bonds and letters of credit, will be administered. Below are bullet points of Chapter 5: Required Improvements within the Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standard Specifications for Improvements which relate to construction guarantees: • Section 11-5-1: Improvement Requirements Prior to Filing Final Plat— If construction does not begin within four (4) years of final plan approval, the subdivider may be required to revise the plan to comply with new city requirements (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) • Section 11-5-2: Subdivision Securities — The subdivider shall post with the City of Yorkville, a construction guarantee in the form of irrevocable letter of credit or irrevocable bond, payable to the United City of Yorkville, sufficient to cover the full cost, plus ten percent (10%) of the required improvements, as estimated by the engineer employed by the subdivider and approved by the city engineer, to assure the satisfactory installation of required improvements...The construction guarantee shall not be reduced to below fifteen percent (15%) of the approved engineer's estimate prior to acceptance of the public improvements by the city . (Ord. 2004-52, 9- 28-2004). • Section 11-5-3A: Construction Warranty — The subdivision letter of credit or bond will not be released until a one year maintenance bond or letter of credit is posted with the city clerk for ten percent (10%) of the land improvement cost, to ensure that any and all improvements will properly function as design,with no defects before the city council formal acceptance. • Section 11-5-3B: Construction Warranty — A maintenance guarantee shall be required for all landscaping, but shall not be required for improvements that are in private property that do not 1 Surety Companies are required to be licensed by the Department of the Treasury which provides a list of all certified companies in good standing h.gp://www.ftns.treas.gov/c570/c570 a-z.html. serve, benefit, or impact properties other than the one being developed (Ord. 2011-03, 1-11- 2011). • Section 11-5-5B: Construction and Inspection — Construction of all improvements required by this title must be completed within two (2)years from the date of approval of the final plat,unless good cause can be shown for granting an extension of time. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004). • Section I1-5-8: Acceptance of Dedication, Improvements- A maintenance bond will then be required in the amount of ten percent(10%� of the cost of the land improvements, as specified in this title, after city council acceptance(Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) • Resolution No. 2009-39: Resolution for the United City of Yorkville Standard Specifications for Improvements.2 • States that "The City will not consider acceptance of the public improvements in a development until it is at least fifty(50)percent built out, or three years after the roadway binder course is paved,whichever is sooner." • States that "Surface course must not be placed until at least seventy (70%) of the adjacent,private improvements are in place. However, in no case shall the surface course be placed until the binder course has been in place for at least one full winter season. In no case shall the surface course be delayed more than three (3) years after the binder course has been installed." • Resolution No. 2009-40: Resolution Modifying a Policy Regarding Procedure and Authority to Reduce Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds for Construction of Land Improvements (see attached).3 • States that requests for reductions for initial bonds or LOCs less than $1 million "The City Engineer shall issue a written recommendation including the basis for approving, denying, or modifying a request for reduction. Said written agreement shall include the amount of the reduction based upon the Engineer's estimate of probable cost as adjusted by an inflation factor front the initial date of the issuance of the Letter of Credit or Performance Bond to the date of reduction. In order to calculate the inflation factor, the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index shall be used. The City Engineer shall also report the remaining amount of the Letter of Credit and/or Performance Bond after reduction." • City Engineer forwards his written recommendation to the City Administrator for approval. If the City Administrator concurs with the City Engineer's recommendation, the reduction is approved or denied and the City Engineer is authorized to issue a letter to implement the decision. However, should the City Engineer and City Administrator differ, the Mayor has the final authority to approve or deny the City Engineer's recommendation. Developer's appeals of the City Administrator's decision are heard by the Mayor,who shall have final determination. • States that requests for reductions for initial bonds or LOCs more than$1 million shall be placed before the City Council for approval. • States that "The retainage used in calculations for Letters of Credit and/or Performance Bond reductions is twenty percent(20%). 2 Resolution 2009-39 establishes the standards by which all infrastructure improvements are to be constructed.However,because it is not an ordinance,the requirements are not codified as part of the Subdivision Control Ordinance. 3 Resolution 2009-40 modified the policy and procedure and authority to reduce letters of credit and performance bonds for construction of land improvements. However, because it is not an ordinance, the requirements are not codified as part of the Subdivision Control Ordinance. Proposed Strategies,Procedures and Polices The staff, consulting engineer and City Attorney have reviewed the current subdivision control ordinance regulations and prior procedures used in implementing bonds for developments within Yorkville. Based upon that review and actions adopted by other communities, we propose to discuss the following strategies, procedures and policies to strengthen the City's tracking of subdivision completion and defensible position should we have to demand a call of a performance bond and/or letter of credit. I. Revise Subdivision Control Ordinance to require completion of Subdivision within 4 years of initial construction. a. Revise the inconsistency/disconnect between the Standard Specifications for Improvements requirements for acceptance (50% built out or 3-years after the roadway binder course) and roadway construction (no surface course until at least 70% of the adjacent, private improvements are complete but no longer than 3-years after binder course) with the Subdivision Control Ordinance requirements for completion of all improvements within two(2)years from the date of approval of the final plat. b. Clarify the distinction between "final plan" in Section 11-5-1 and "final plat" in Section 11-5-5 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance by referencing the "final engineering plan" and"final subdivision plat",respectively. c. Amend the Subdivision Control Ordinance to provide that "the failure to complete any infrastructure component is a violation of the code if such incomplete component may result in the harm to the system or potential failure of the system. d. Extensions may be requested by the Developer and approved by either the City Administrator or City Council upon recommendation by the City Engineer and Public Works Director. e. Extensions granted for no more than 1 year at a time and require: (1) submittal of a revised construction schedule, (2) updated engineers estimate of probable cost for completion and(3)updated LOC or Bond with revised amounts. f. Require an application fee for construction extension requests. g. Enforce the current Subdivision Control regulations for roadways and binder course installed no later than 3 years. II. Revise Subdivision Control Ordinance to require "Acknowledgement of Public Improvement Completion Schedule"(please see attached sample) a. Schedule outlines when the public improvements are to be completed and signed by the City&Developer. b. Schedule states the City will place as a condition in the Final Plat of Subdivision approval Ordinance or PUD Agreement Ordinance that the development must have all streets, sewers, water mains, street lights, etc... installed in a workmanship like manner within 4 years of initial construction. c. Schedule will require the developer provide proof via a title search that all accepted infrastructure is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. d. Schedule states the developer will maintain the public improvements until they are approved and accepted by the City. III. Quarterly tracking of Letters of Credits and Bonds re:Expiration Dates a. Projects nearing 2 years into construction and less than 40% built out will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer and require an updated Public Improvement Completion(PIC) Schedule. b. Projects nearing 3 years into construction and less than 50% built out will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer with punchlist and require an updated PIC Schedule. c. Projects nearing 4 years into construction and less than 60% built out will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer with punchlist, require an updated PIC Schedule and formal notification that the project will be in default if an extension is not requested/approved prior to 4 year construction deadline. d. Projects over 4 years into construction and less than 70% built out will receive formal notification of default from City Engineer, at the City council direction, indicating that the LOC or Bond is subject to a demand for call within sixty (60) days of date of notice should the developer not seek an extension for completion. IV. Revise Section I1-5-2 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance re: Contingency Requirement and Reduction of Bond Procedures • Increase the contingency requirement from ten percent (10%) to twenty percent (20%) contingency of the required improvements, as estimated by the engineer employed by the subdivider and approved by the city engineer, to assure the satisfactory installation of required improvements. • Codify the currently practiced reduction and release of letter of credit/bonds procedures as part of the partial or final acceptance process for subdivision improvements. Staff is seeking direction and feedback from the Public Works Committee on the strategies, procedures and policies proposed, as this is intended to be open for discussion before a formal proposed ordinance amendment is presented. For your convenience, the ordinance and resolutions referenced in this memorandum have been provided as attachments. Staff and the City Engineer will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to discuss in greater detail. Summary of Letter of Credit/Bonds March 15,2012 United City of Yorkville Bank Original Current Expiration Notification Development Name Amount Amount Date Reqd? Surety:Doc No. Autumn Creek Phase 1A $2,103,462.35 $316,959.54 28-Jun-07 Yes SafeCo Surety Bond 96346371 Autumn Creek Phase 1A $7,423,831.42 $946,396.58 18-Oct-12 Yes The Fidelity&Deposit Co:Bond#08824717 Autumn Creek-Rt.34 Improvements $726,323.29 $100,000.00 18-Jun-12 Yes Bond Safeguard Insurance Cc;Bond#5027906 Autumn Creek Phase 2 $1,327,792.60 $317,303.84 8-Aug-07 Yes SafeCo Surety:Bond#6414740 Autumn Creek Phase 2 $1,550,252.77 $321,200.38 24-Oct-12 Yes Bond Safeguard;Bond#5030622 Betzwiser Property $10,000.00 $10,000.00 30-Oct-03 Yes First Midwest Bank:No.150008800-201 Betzwiser Property $15,711.30 $136,657.00 29-Apr-08 Yes First Midwest Bank:No.150018041-201 Blackberry Woods $745,798.28 $122,117.30 1-Jul-09 Yes Castle Bank LOC#7000262003-901 Blackberry Woods $2,982,579.59 $1,027,898.45 30-Apr-09 Yes Castle Bank LOC#7000262003-902 Blackstone Bar&Grill $19,985.63 $19,985.63 6-Jun-06 No American Southern Bond#B98804-010280 Blackstone Bar&Grill $7,900.00 $7,900.00 7-Nov-11 No American Southern Bond#698804-014514 Block 4 Black's Addition(Morgan St.TH) $24,476.00 $12,313.06 21-Aug-12 Yes First National Bank-Yorkville:LOC#140 BP Amoco $2,541.00 $2,541.00 1-Sep-12 Yes Liberty Bond Services;Bond#285027359 BP Amoco $18,471.20 $18,471.20 1-Sep-12 Yes Liberty Bond Services;Bond#285027360 BP Amoco $25,425.00 $25,425.00 18-Sep-12 Yes Liberty Bond Services;Bond#285027372 Bridge Street Self-Storage $30,000.00 $30,000.00 N/A N/A Western Surety Co.No.25311858 Bridge Street Self-Storage $13,000.00 $13,000.00 1-Nov-06 No Western Surety Co.No.43228543 Bristol Bay-Phase 1(Units 1-7) $403,308.04 $403,308.04 N/A N/A Fidelity&Deposit Company of Maryland;Bond#8771376 Bristol Bay-Unit 1 $24,200.00 $24,200.00 N/A N/A International Fidelity Insurance Company;Bond#0504706 Bristol Bay-Unit 2 $147,400.00 $147,400.00 N/A N/A International Fidelity Insurance Company;Bond#0504707 Bristol Bay-Unit 3 $378,599.02 $174,260.98 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114152 Bristol Bay-Unit 3 $91,042.89 $91,042.89 N/A N/A Safeco Insurance Co.of America;Bond#6544062 Bristol Bay-Unit 3 $22,349.30 $19,334.94 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114158 Bristol Bay-Unit 4 $140,669.75 $140,669.75 N/A N/A Armor Assurance Co.;Bond#ARM 10697 Bristol Bay-Unit 5 $72,671.07 $72,671.07 N/A N/A Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.,Bond#268000460 Bristol Bay-Unit 9 $1,453,294.78 $847,848.97 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114154 Bristol Bay-Unit 9 $151,468.83 $151,468.83 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114157 Bristol Bay-Unit 9 $10,471.65 $10,471.65 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114160 Bristol Bay-Unit 10 $19,103.42 $19,103.42 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114161 Bristol Bay-Unit 11 $18,025.26 $18,025.26 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114162 Bristol Bay-Unit 11 $1,309,846.19 $657,233.93 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114155 Bristol Bay-Unit 11 $232,023.36 $232,023.36 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114156 Bristol Bay-Unit 12 $7,869.78 $7,869.78 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114163 Bristol Bay-Unit 13 $32,537.31 $32,537.31 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114164 Caledonia-Phase 1 $4,135,187.65 $745,764.75 7-Jul-06 Yes Old Second Bank No.2912 Caledonia-Phase 1 $98,669.23 $57,151.80 3-Oct-06 Yes Old Second Bank No.2927 Caledonia-Phase 2 $1,260,271.92 $361,512.45 8-Aug-08 Yes Old Second Bank No.2968 Caledonia-Phase 2 $82,027.00 $69,866.50 14-Feb-09 Yes Old Second Bank;LOC#309000356 Castle Bank(Old) $8,382.00 $8,382.00 31-May-11 No Developers Surety&Indemnity Co.Bond#717989C Cornerstone/Briarwood $600,000.00 $139,678.41 N/A N/A Lexon Insurance Co.Bond#1010743 Cornerstone/Briarwood $1,105,331.80 $337,898.08 N/A N/A Bond Safeguard Ins.Co.Bond#5012882 Culvers Restaurant $45,381.60 $45,381.60 2-Dec-06 Yes Port Washington State Bank LOC#RJ2005-1 Curtis Commercial $18,762.50 $18,762.50 25-Oct-07 Yes Inland Bank&Trust;LOC#20061025 DK Landscape $3,869.14 $298.07 8-May-10 Yes Old Second Bank;LOC#62201001211 F.E.Wheaton $771,402.24 $771,402.24 13-Sep-12 No Fidelity&Deposit Company of Maryland;Bond#08865669 Fountain Village of Yorkville $1,079,916.00 $414,538.10 5-Sep-12 Yes Standard Bank&Trust Co.LOC#11953 Fountain Village of Yorkville $1,244,100.00 $1,244,100.00 8-Nov-07 Yes Great American Insurance Co.:Bond#FS7763560 Fountainview $209,072.00 $54,365.56 1-Jun-11 Yes Standard Bank&Trust Cc:LOC#12045 Fountainview $322,972.19 $322,972.19 12-Nov-15 No Safeco Insurance Company of America;Bond#28S101255 Fountainview 1 $0.00 $0.00 Summary of Letter of Credit/Bonds March 15,2012 United City of Yorkville Bank Original Current Expiration Notification Development Name Amount Amount Date Reqd? Surety:Doc No. Fox Hill-Unit 7 $234,302.50 $41,443.05 6-Dec-09 Yes Old 2nd Bank Yorkville LOC#2942 Fox Hill-Resub of Lot 1 $88,500.00 $88,500.00 0-Jan-00 0 Fox Mill Landing $67,524.60 $15,544.88 N/A N/A Ohio Farmers Insurance Co.:Bond#5947328 Grande Reserve $3,049,410.93 $668,679.58 10-Oct-05 Yes LaSalle Bank:No.5559532 Grande Reserve-Route 34 Improvements $493,595.85 $67,308.53 N/A N/A Bond Safeguard Ins.Co.Bond#5017193 Grande Reserve-Regional Park $524,337.00 $71,500.50 18-Jul-06 No LaSalle Bank LOC#S582610 Grande Reserve-Units 5,14-15,18,20-23,25-27 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 15-Feb-12 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239268 Grande Reserve-Units 4&6 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 20-Feb-09 Yes Bond Safeguard Insurance Co.Bond#5021306 Grande Reserve-Unit 12 $209,211.73 $31,689.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239269 Grande Reserve-Units 12,13,&19a $274,074.61 $37,374.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239270 Grande Reserve-Unit 13&19a $252,514.14 $41,688.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239271 Grande Reserve-Unit 12 $542,403.78 $136,524.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239272 Grande Reserve-Unit 13 $875,399.14 $210,662.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239274 Grande Reserve-Unit 13 $47,250.00 $31,500.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239275 Grande Reserve-Units 14,18,19b,&25 $687,110.68 $141,393.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239276 Grande Reserve-Unit 14 $568,594.00 $160,449.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239277 Grande Reserve-Units 15&22 $505,262.51 $98,430.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239278 Grande Reserve-Unit 15 $1,123,923.00 $264,213.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239279 Grande Reserve-Unit 19 $33,003.30 $33,003.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239280 Grande Reserve-Unit 20 $1,624,467.73 $415,258.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239281 Grande Reserve-Unit 22 $407,404.75 $155,634.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239282 Grande Reserve-Units 23,26,&27 $932,703.75 $100,000.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239283 Grande Reserve-Unit 23 $3,434,369.52 $660,794.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239284 Grande Reserve-Unit 23 $837,036.20 $783,770.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239285 Grande Reserve-Units 20&21 $128,926.05 $25,075.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239286 Grande Reserve-Unit 12 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239273 Hampton Inn(Menards-6th Addn.) $38,424.00 $8,156.10 21-May-11 Yes Western Surety;Bond#70706014 Haws&Assoc. $11,000.00 $11,000.00 1-Jun-98 Yes Sandwich State Bank:No.349 Kalant Office $10,000.00 $10,000.00 N/A N/A Bond Safeguard Insurance Company;Bond#14-81351 Kendall Marketplace $250,000.00 $250,000.00 28-Oct-10 Yes Bank of America;LOC#3100716 Kendall Marketplace $6,046,490.89 $0.00 N/A N/A Traveler's Casualty&Surety Co,of America;Bond#104936839 Kendallwood Estates $1,022,588.60 $179,977.42 20-Feb-09 Yes Castle Bank;LOC#3000221071-900 Kendallwood Estates $4,520,298.60 $1,857,386.47 20-Feb-09 Yes Castle Bank;LOC#3000221071-901 Kleinwachter Property $2,500.00 $2,500.00 4-Oct-12 No Westfield/Ohio Farmer's Insurance Company;Bond 90046344 Kleinwachter Property $226,818.90 $121,245.16 19-Oct-08 Yes Castle Bank;LOC#7000266119-900 Kritzberg(101 E.Center St.) $5,000.00 $5,000.00 N/A N/A The Ohio Casualty Insurance Cc;Bond#3-868-103 Milazzo $30,000.00 $30,000.00 26-Jan-14 No State Farm Fire&Casualty;Bond#93BHM2021 Prairie Garden Sub. $864,761.95 $134,960.50 19-Oct-02 Yes State Bank of Illinois No.2001-27 Prairie Garden Sub.-Resub of Lot 4 $348,963.14 $164,784.74 2-May-06 Yes State Bank of Illinois No.2005-12 Prairie Pointe(USPS Watermain) $27,676.82 $3,774.09 31-May-07 Yes Castle Bank;LOC#7000280686-900 Prestwick of Yorkville-Phase 1 $1,200,000.00 $259,658.65 2-Sep-06 No HomeStar Bank LOC#2005-0902 Prestwick of Yorkville-Phase 1 $3,533.75 $3,353.75 N/A N/A The Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.Bond#3-829-554 Prestwick of Yorkville-Phase 1 $3,702,458.77 $1,554,408.48 31-Mar-07 Yes Homestar Bank;LOC#69432050 Provena/Dreyer Medical Facility $84,848.95 $61,366.01 N/A N/A Continental Casualty Co.Bond No.929341633 Raging Waves $1,642,844.00 $100,000.00 1-May-12 Yes Comerica Bank;LOC 9628335-04 Raging Waves $109,182.26 $14,888.49 27-Jun-08 Yes American Southern Ins.Co.;Bond#698815017299 Raging Waves $76,450.00 $10,425.00 1-May-09 Yes Comerica Bank;LOC#635815-04 Raging Waves $698,023.11 $698,023.11 23-May-13 No HUB International Scheers;Bond#08886773 Raintree Village-Unit 4 $1,694,781.00 $396,809.12 9-Mar-10 Yes Bond Safeguard Insurance Cc;Bond#5035420 Raintree Village-Unit 5 $2,436,108.84 $503,184.11 9-Mar-10 Yes Bond Safeguard Insurance Cc;Bond#5035421 Raintree Village-Unit 6 $2,371,091.40 $891,128.30 9-Mar-10 Yes Bond Safeguard Insurance Cc;Bond#5035422 Raintree Village-Rt.71 Improvements $3,000.00 $3,000.00 18-Jul-08 N/A Arch Insurance Company:Bond#104125069 Reserve at the Fox $30,583.10 $30,583.10 31-Dec-07 Yes Bond Safeguard Ins.Co.Bond#5026777 Rush-Copley Phase 1 $1,172,768.12 $106,607.51 19-Dec-07 Yes Old Second Bank;LOC#2987 Rush-Copley Phases 1&1A $448,733.40 $243,257.88 19-Aug-12 Yes Old Second Bank;LOC#60101004772 Rush-Copley Phase 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 1-Jan-12 No Cincinnati Insurance Cc;Bond#60293062 Rush-Copley Phase 1 $832,340.70 $104,613.80 2-May-09 Yes Old Second National Bank;LOC#60101002503 Rush-Copley Phase 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 14-Jul-14 No Western Surety;Bond#929479574 Rush-Copley Drive B $530,550.00 $530,550.00 17-Mar-16 No Cincinatti Insurance Bond#0532851 Rush-Copley FEC $73,117.00 $73,117.00 2-May-12 Yes Old Second-LOC#60101009607 Rush-Copley FEC $521,415.73 $521,415.73 2-May-12 I Yes Old Second-LOC#6010100581 Summary of Letter of Credit/Bonds March 15,2012 United City of Yorkville Bank Original Current Expiration Notification Development Name Amount Amount Date Reqd? Surety:Doc No. Saravanos Property(Stagecoach Crossing) $213,472.60 $26,039.10 29-Apr-13 Yes First Midwest Bank No.150017273-201 Saravanos Property(Stagecoach Crossing) $490,864.75 $193,573.88 30-Jun-12 Yes First Midwest Bank No.150017273-202 Saravanos Property(Stagecoach Crossing) $525,504.70 $50,000.00 16-Aug-07 Yes Developers Surety&Indemnity Co.;Bond#718566S Savitski Property $18,135.00 30-Jun-05 No Old Second Bank-Yorkville:LOC No.15298 Speedway Station $2,022.46 $2,022.46 21-Sep-07 Yes Safeco Insurance Co.;Bond#6435626 Speedway Station $11,800.00 $11,800.00 29-Sep-07 Yes Safeco Insurance Co.;Bond#6435630 Swanson Lane Estates $188,884.85 $188,884.85 31-Oct-07 Yes Old Second Bank;LOC#361000500 The National Bank $96,767.00 $96,767.00 31-Oct-08 Yes LaSalle Bank LOC#S599947 United Science Industries $10,000.00 $10,000.00 7-Jan-12 No Old Republic Surety;Bond#RL10627158 US Cellular $2,032.25 $2,032.25 N/A N/A Safeco Insurance Company;Bond#6703980 Verizon Wireless $10,000.00 $10,000.00 n/a n/a Feceral Insurance Cc Bond#82160804 Villas at the Preserve $762,214.04 $762,214.04 7-Nov-06 Yes LaSalle Bank LOC#S585845 Walgreens(North) $41,931.25 $41,931.25 N/A N/A Travelers Bond No.008SB103738505BCM Walnut Plaza $18,541.60 $18,541.60 28-Apr-07 Yes LaSalle Bank LOC#S590057 Walnut Plaza $10,904.05 $10,904.05 28-Sep-07 Yes Great American Insurance Co.;Bond#FS7572245 Westbury Village-Unit 1(Pod 6) $1,035,000.00 $1,035,000.00 18-Oct-06 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#98815012754 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $276,533.00 $276,533.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015131 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $333,052.00 $333,052.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015132 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $480,670.00 $480,670.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015133 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $888,735.00 $888,735.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015134 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $73,689.00 $73,689.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015135 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $14,823.00 $14,823.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015136 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $429,379.00 $429,379.00 27-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015143 Whispering Meadows-Unit 1 $646,063.44 $142,563.44 N/A N/A Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08778950 Whispering Meadows-Unit 1 $2,521,235.09 $428,236.43 N/A N/A Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08780402 Whispering Meadows-Unit 2 $252,641.40 $121,727.22 N/A N/A Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08780403 Whispering Meadows-Unit 2 $3,162,992.03 $717,347.37 N/A N/A Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08780401 Whispering Meadows-Unit 4 $2,947,427.87 $632,599.56 2-Mar-07 Yes Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08825607 Whispering Meadows-Unit 4 $313,727.70 $232,443.71 2-Mar-07 Yes Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08825608 Windett Ridge $1,330,156.30 $142,937.37 30-May-05 N/A Gulf Insurance Group No.B21878117 Windett Ridge $1,158,724.04 $227,700.00 N/A N/A Lexon Insurance Co.Bond No.1004373 Wrigley $62,979.40 $62,979.40 21-Oct-11 Yes EMC Insurance Companies;Bond#S38-20-99 Yorkville Animal Care Center $5,000.00 $5,000.00 29-Apr-13 No RLI Surety;Bond#RSB4091676 Yorkville Business Center-Lot 21 $46,200.00 $46,200.00 N/A No NISB Bank Cashier's Check#9374 Yorkville Business Center(Nicor Facility) $792,559.90 $144,101.80 N/A N/A Travelers Casualty&Surety Company of America;Bond#105093176 Yorkville Market Square $29,131.85 $29,131.85 9-Apr-12 No Developers Surety&Indemnity;Bond#719538C Yorkville Market Square $912,800.91 $269,426.31 23-Jul-11 Yes Bank of Deerfield;LOC#532 401 W.Fox Street $10,000.00 $10,000.00 11-Mar-10 No Western Surety Co.;Bond#15269167 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 40 Title 11 SUBDIVISION CONTROL Chapter 1 GENERAL SUBDIVISION PROVISIONS 11-1-1 : TITLE: This title shall hereafter be known, cited, and referred to as the YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-1-2: INTENT AND PURPOSE: The regulations of this title are adopted: A. To protect the interests of the landowner, the investor in land, the homeowner, and the municipal unit; B. To conserve, protect, and enhance property and property values; to secure the most efficient use of land; and to facilitate the provisions of public improvements; C. To provide for orderly growth and development; to afford adequate facilities for the safe and efficient means for traffic circulation of the public; and to safeguard the public against flood damage; http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 40 D. To prescribe reasonable rules and regulations governing the subdivision and platting of land; the preparation of plats; the location, width, and course of streets and highways; the installation of utilities, street pavements, and other essential improvements; and the provision of necessary public grounds for schools, parks, playgrounds, and other public open space; and E. To establish procedures for the submission, approval, and recording of plats, to provide the means for enforcement of this title, and to provide penalties for violations. (Ord. 2004- 52, 9-28-2004) 11-1-3: GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Jurisdiction: This title shall apply to all subdivision of land within the incorporated limits of the united city of Yorkville, and within its contiguous territory, but not more than one and one-half (11/2) miles beyond the incorporated limits of the united city of Yorkville. B. Interpretation: 1. Minimum Requirements: The provisions of this title shall be held to be the minimum requirements for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. 2. Relationship With Other Laws: Where the conditions imposed by any provision of this title are either more restrictive or less restrictive than comparable conditions imposed by any other ordinance, law, resolution, rule, or regulation of any kind, the regulations that are more restrictive (or which impose higher standards or requirements) shall govern. 3. Effect On Existing Agreement: This title is not intended to abrogate any easement, covenant, or any other private agreement, provided that where the regulations of this title are more restrictive (or impose higher standards or requirements) than such easements, covenants, or other private agreements, the requirements of this title shall govern. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 40 4. Standard Specifications For Improvements: The standard specifications for improvements, resolution 2004-39, as amended, which is on file in the city clerk's office, shall be hereby included and made a part of this title in its entirety. 5. Park Development Standards: The park development standards, which are on file in the city clerk's office, shall be hereby included and made a part of this title in their entirety. C. Rules Of Word Construction: In the construction of this title, the rules contained herein shall be observed and applied, except when the context clearly indicates otherwise: 1. Words used in the present tense shall include the future, and words used in the singular number shall include the plural number, and the plural shall include the singular. 2. The word "shall" is mandatory, and not discretionary. 3. The word "may" is permissive. 4. The masculine gender includes the feminine and neuter. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-1-4: DEFINITIONS: The following words and terms, wherever they occur in this title, shall be interpreted as herein defined: ALLEY: A public right of way primarily designed to serve as secondary access to the side or rear of properties whose principal frontage is on some other street. BLOCK: A tract of land bounded by streets, or by a combination of streets, railway rights of way, or waterways. BUILDING SETBACK LINE: A line across a lot or parcel of land, establishing the minimum open space to be provided between the line of a building or structure, and the lot line of the lot or parcel. CITY: The mayor and city council of the united city of Yorkville, Illinois. CROSSWALK: A strip of land ten feet (10') or more in width, dedicated to public use, which is reserved across a block to provide pedestrian access to adjacent areas, and may include http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 4 of 40 utilities, where necessary. CUL-DE-SAC: A street having only one outlet, and an appropriate terminal for the reversal of traffic movement, without the need to back up. DEAD END STREET: A street having only one outlet. DENSITY, GROSS: A numerical value obtained by dividing the total dwelling units in a development by the gross area of the tract of land upon which the dwelling units are located. DENSITY, NET: A numerical value obtained by dividing the total dwelling units in a development by the total area of the development, less rights of way, parks, storm water management areas, and all other nonresidential uses. DEVELOPMENT: Any manmade change to real estate, including: A. Preparation of a plat of subdivision; B. Construction, reconstruction, or placement of a building or any addition to a building; C. Installation of a manufactured home on a site, preparing a site for a manufactured home, or installing a travel trailer on a site for more than one hundred eighty (180) days; D. Construction of roads, bridges, or similar projects; E. Redevelopment of a site; F. Filling, dredging, grading, clearing, excavating, paving, or other nonagricultural alterations of the ground surface; G. Storage of materials, or deposit of solid or liquid waste; H. Any other activity that might alter the magnitude, frequency, deviation, direction, or velocity of storm water flows from a property. EASEMENT: A grant by a property owner for the use of a parcel of land by the general public, a corporation, or a certain person or persons for a specific purpose or purposes. EYEBROW CUL-DE-SAC: A cul-de-sac whose center radius point is less than eighty feet (80') from the centerline of the intersecting cross street. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 5 of 40 FLOODPLAIN: See definition in section 8-7-2 of this code. FRONTAGE: The property on one side of a street, between two (2) intersecting streets (crossing or terminating), measured along the line of the street; or, with a dead end street, all property abutting one side of such street, measured from the nearest intersecting street and the end of the dead end street. FRONTAGE ROAD: A public or private marginal access roadway, generally paralleling and contiguous to a street or highway, and designed to promote safety by eliminating unlimited ingress and egress to such street or highway by providing points of ingress and egress at relatively uniform spaced intervals. HALF STREET: A street bordering one or more property lines of a subdivision tract, to which the subdivider has allocated only a portion of the ultimate and intended street width. IDOT: Illinois department of transportation. IMPROVEMENT PLANS: The drawing of all required land improvements, prepared by an Illinois registered professional engineer, and all accompanying information as required by this title. IMPROVEMENTS: All facilities constructed or erected by a subdivider within a subdivision, to permit and facilitate the use of lots or blocks for a principal residential, business, or manufacturing purpose. LAND IMPROVEMENT: All required on site and off site subdivision improvements including, but not limited to, any sanitary sewage system, water distribution system, storm drainage systems, public utility systems, sidewalk systems, public or private streets, street lighting, street signs, grading and drainageway facilities, pedestrianways, and retention and detention basins. LOT: A portion of a subdivision or other parcel of land, intended for transfer of ownership, or for building developments. LOT DEPTH: The distance between the midpoint of the front lot line and the midpoint of the rear lot line. LOT, DOUBLE FRONTAGE: A lot, two (2) opposite lot lines of which abut upon streets which are more or less parallel. LOT LINE: The boundary line of a lot. LOT WIDTH: The distance on a horizontal plane between the side lot lines of a lot, measured at right angles to the line, establishing the lot depth at the established building setback line. PARCEL: Shall refer broadly to a lot, tract, or any other piece of land. PARKING LOT: An area permanently reserved and/or used for the temporary storage of motor vehicles. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 6 of 40 PARKWAY: A strip of land situated within the dedicated street right of way, either located between the roadway and right of way line, or a median located between the roadways. PLAN, CONCEPT: A tentative map or drawing which indicates the subdivider's proposed layout of a subdivision, including a site plan indicating existing off site roadway connections. PLAN, FINAL: The final plat, plus all accompanying information required by this title. PLAN, PRELIMINARY: The preliminary plat, plus all accompanying information required by this title. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Parcel of land or contiguous parcels of land in single ownership or unified control, to be developed as a single entity, the character of which is compatible with adjacent parcels, and the intent of the zoning district in which it is located; the developer may be granted relief from specific land use regulations and design standards in return for assurances of an overall quality of development, including any specific features which will be of benefit to the city as a whole, and would not otherwise be required by the city ordinances. PLAT: A subdivision as it is represented as a formal document by drawing and writing. PLAT, FINAL: The final map drawing or chart, on which the subdivider's layout of a subdivision is presented to the city council for approval, and which, if approved, will be submitted to the county recorder for recording. PLAT, PRELIMINARY: A tentative map or drawing, which indicates the subdivider's proposed layout of a subdivision, including all proposed improvements. RESUBDIVISION: The subdivision of a tract of land that has previously been lawfully subdivided, and a plat of such prior subdivision duly recorded. RIGHT OF WAY: A strip of land occupied or intended to be occupied by a road, crosswalk, railroad, electric transmission line, oil or gas pipeline, water main, sanitary or storm sewer main, or for another special use. The usage of the term "right of way" for land platting purposes in the united city of Yorkville shall mean that every right of way hereafter established and shown on a final recorded plat is to be separate and distinct from the lots or parcels adjoining such right of way, and not included within the dimensions or areas of such lots or parcels. Rights of way intended for roads, crosswalks, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, or any other use involving maintenance by a public agency shall be dedicated to public use by the maker of the plat on which such right of way is established. ROADWAY: The paved portion of the street available for vehicular traffic. SERVICE DRIVE: A public street, generally paralleling and contiguous to a main traveled way, primarily designed to promote safety by eliminating promiscuous ingress and egress to the right of way, and providing safe and orderly points of access at fairly uniformly spaced intervals. SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM, CENTRAL: A system of sanitary sewers, serving ten (10) or more lots that discharge either into an interceptor sewer or an approved sewage treatment plant. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 7 of 40 SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM, INDIVIDUAL: A sewage disposal system, or any other sewage treatment device approved by the Kendall County department of public health, and servicing only one lot. SIDEWALK: That portion of street or crosswalk way, paved or otherwise surfaced, intended for pedestrian use only. STREET: A public or private right of way which affords a primary means of access to abutting properties, whether designated as a street, avenue, highway, road, boulevard, lane, throughway, or however otherwise designated, but excepting driveways to buildings. STREET, COLLECTOR: A street that collects and distributes traffic, primarily within residential areas. This street carries between two thousand five hundred (2,500) and twelve thousand (12,000) ADT. STREET, ESTATE RESIDENTIAL: A street of limited continuity, used for access to abutting rural residential properties and local needs of a neighborhood. This street carries less than one thousand (1,000) ADT. STREET, HALF: A street bordering one or more property lines of a tract of land in which the subdivider has allocated but part of the ultimate right of way width. STREET, LOCAL RESIDENTIAL: A street of limited continuity, used primarily for access to abutting rural residential properties and local needs of a neighborhood. This street carries less than one thousand (1,000) ADT. STREET, MAJOR COLLECTOR: A street that serves as a main traffic thoroughfare, both within and outside of the city, carrying heavy volumes of traffic. This street carries more than two thousand five hundred (2,500) ADT. STREET, MARGINAL ACCESS: A minor street which is parallel to and adjacent to a thoroughfare, and which provides access to abutting properties and protection from through traffic. STREET, MINOR COLLECTOR: A street that collects and distributes traffic within intensively developed areas, and is used primarily for internal trips within the planning area. This street carries between one thousand (1,000) and two thousand five hundred (2,500) ADT. STREET WIDTH: The shortest distance between the backs of the curb or edge of pavement of a roadway. SUBDIVIDER: Any person or corporation or duly authorized agent who undertakes the "subdivision" or "development" of land as defined herein. Also referred to as developer. SUBDIVISION: A described tract of land which is to be, or has been, divided into two (2) or more lots or parcels. The term subdivision includes resubdivision and, where it is appropriate to the context, relates to the process of subdividing or to the land subdivided. For the purpose of this title, the requirements contained herein shall not apply, and no plat is http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 8 of 40 required, in any of the following instances: A. The division or subdivision of land into parcels or tracts of five (5) acres or more in size which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; B. The division of lots or blocks of less than one acre, in any recorded subdivision, which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; C. The sale or exchange of parcels of land between owners of adjoining and contiguous land; D. The conveyance of parcels of land or interests therein for use as right of way for railroads or other public utility facilities which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; E. The conveyance of land owned by a railroad or other public utility which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; F. The conveyance of land for highway or other public purposes or grants or conveyances relating to the dedication of land for public use or instruments relating to the vacation of land impressed with a public use; G. Conveyances made to correct descriptions in prior conveyances; H. The sale or exchange of parcels or tracts of land into no more than two (2) parcels not involving any new streets or easement of access, provided each parcel meets the minimum lot size of the zoning district in which it is located. TURNAROUND: An area at the closed end of a street or parking lot, within which vehicles may reverse their direction. WETLANDS: As defined by the Illinois department of natural resources. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28 -2004; amd. Ord. 2008-85, 9-23-2008; Ord. 2011-24, 6-14-2011) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 9 of 40 Chapter 2 PROCEDURE FOR SUBMISSION OF PLAT 11-2-1 : CONCEPT PLAN: Instructions for subdivision plat processes leading to approval and plat recording: A. Application: Petitioners who wish to start the process with a concept plan should at this time submit his application (the original and 35 copies) along with thirty five (35) folded copies of his concept plan, a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the targeted plan commission meeting. As part of the application, the petitioner shall also provide the names and addresses of all landowners within five hundred feet (500') of the application property to the city's deputy clerk for the purpose of sending certified notices of the required public hearing(s). B. Review: Petitioner needs to schedule a meeting with the city administrator, city engineer, and director of public works, to review access, availability of water, sewer, storm water, and other related technical issues, at least two (2) weeks prior to the targeted plan commission. C. Park Board: Petitioner must attend the scheduled park board meeting if the development has a residential component. The petitioner (or his duly authorized representative) will present the concept plan, and discuss how it fits into the overall city park plan. The park board will make a recommendation regarding the petitioner's plan for parks. D. Plan Commission: Petitioner must attend the scheduled plan commission meeting, which will involve an informal public comment session after the petitioner (or his duly authorized representative) presents his concept plan. E. Committee Of The Whole: Petitioner must attend the scheduled committee of the whole meeting, which will involve a presentation of the concept plan by the petitioner (or his duly authorized representative), and informal discussion with the committee members. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 10 of 40 11-2-2: PRELIMINARY PLAN: A. The preliminary plan is a drawing complying with all provisions of this title, and when considered necessary by the plan commission or the plan council, should be accompanied byother engineering drawings concerning required improvements on which final review for adherence to design standards and improvement proposals is based, and from which detailed engineering drawings can proceed. B. When the petitioner does not wish to present a concept plan, he will start with his preliminary plan, and at this time submit his application. Petitioner will be invoiced for the required annexation, rezoning, engineering, and other applicable fees, which must be paid in full prior to being placed on the plan commission agenda. A deposit for legal and planning services will also be invoiced, and is due at this time. Payment should be made to the deputy clerk at the united city of Yorkville administrative offices. As part of the application, the petitioner shall also provide the names and addresses of all landowners within five hundred feet (500') of the application property to the city's deputy clerk, for the purpose of sending certified notices of the required public hearing(s). C. Following a written report from the plan council, and after review of the preliminary plan and discussion with the subdivider on changes and additions that may be required for the plan, the plan commission shall make a recommendation in writing to the city council. D. After review of the preliminary plan and the recommendation of the plan commission, the city council shall discuss with the subdivider the proposed plan and shall, within forty five (45) days, act on the preliminary plan. The subdivider shall be notified in writing of any conditions of approval or reasons for disapproval. E. Approval of the preliminary plan is tentative only, and shall be effective for a period of twelve (12) months. If the final plat has not been recorded within this time limit, the preliminary plan must again be submitted for approval, unless upon application by the subdivider, the city council grants an extension. An extension period shall not exceed two (2) 12-month periods. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page I I of 40 F. Ordinances in effect on the date of preliminary plan approval shall govern the preparation of the final plan. Ordinances in effect on the date(s) of final plat approval(s) shall govern any fees paid or contributions made by the developer. G. Fees for legal and planning services will be billed based on per hour range of work being performed. These amounts are deducted from the deposit amount invoiced earlier, and a statement of account (reflecting the current credit balance) is sent to the petitioner with the consulting bills enclosed. All fees must be current before proceeding to the next stage of the approval process. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-2-3: FINAL PLAN: A. Approval Of Plans: Approval of the preliminary plan shall entitle the subdivider to approval of the final plan, provided that the final plan: 1. Conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plan; 2. Meets all conditions of said approval; and 3. Complies with all applicable, current ordinances. B. Disapproval Of Final Plan: Disapproval of the final plan is warranted if: 1. There are more than minor deviations from the approved preliminary plan; and/or 2. A new highway, pipeline, or other major improvement shall directly affect the proposed development site. C. Proposed Improvement Plans To Be Reviewed: The proposed final plat must be accompanied by twelve (12) sets of the proposed improvement plans for review by the plan council. D. Recommendation In Writing: After reviewing the final plat and applicable minutes from the plan council and any discussions on changes and additions that may be required, the http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 12 of 40 plan commission shall recommend in writing to the city council, within forty five (45) days from receipt of the plan council minutes, either approval or disapproval of the final plat and its reasons for such recommendation. E. Further Review: The final plat then proceeds to the economic development committee which consists of four (4) city council members for its further review and recommendation. Project then moves to the committee of the whole and then the city council meeting for approval or disapproval. F. Prepared By A Registered Professional Engineer: The proposed improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer of Illinois, who shall be responsible for the design of all public and land improvements required by this subdivision ordinance, as provided in the Illinois professional engineering act. The submitted plans shall be sealed by said professional engineer, and shall be in conformance with the city's standard specifications for improvements, and these city specifications shall be the only specifications for the improvements. G. Final Plat Submission: The final plat cannot be submitted to the plan commission until the improvement plans are approved and signed by the city engineer and the city administrator, and all fees are paid, and all required securities are filed. H. Recording Of Final Plat: The final plat shall be recorded with the county recorder of deeds, within thirty (30) days from the date of final approval, or final approval shall be considered null and void. This requirement shall not apply when delay inrecording a plat is due to circumstances beyond the control of the city or developer. I. Final Engineering Plan: Submit three (3) sets of the final engineering plans to the deputy clerk at the city administrative offices for review and recommendation by the city engineer. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 13 of 40 Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANS AND PLATS 11-3-1 : MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The following requirements are held to be the minimum amount of information necessary to convey to the representatives of united city of Yorkville a complete and accurate description of the kind and quality of subdivision proposed. Additional information may be submitted if it will further clarify the proposed subdivision. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-3-2: PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE PLAN: A. Concept Plan: The concept plan may be done freehand, but shall be done with reasonable accuracy and clarity. The scale of the drawing should be one inch equals one hundred feet (1" = 100'), unless clarity or size of drawing dictates otherwise. The following information shall be shown: 1. Name and address of the owner or subdivider. 2. North arrow and scale. 3. Approximate dimensions and area of parcel. 4. Topography - not greater than ten foot (10') contour intervals such as can be obtained from USGS maps. 5. Proposed layout of streets, lots, parks, and nonresidential areas, including storm water control. 6. Number of dwelling units, gross and net density. 7. Minimum and average lot sizes. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 14 of 40 8. Gross and net area. 9. For multiple-family, commercial and industrial areas: a. Location of buildings. b. Approximate dimensions and area of site. c. Off street parking, delivery, and pick up areas. d. Buffer zones. B. Existing Conditions: Presence of any of the following shall be shown on the sketch plan or an additional sheet: 1. Streams, marshes, bodies of water, wooded areas, wetland, and other significant natural features. 2. Location and direction of all watercourses, drainageways, and areas subject to flooding. 3. Location of storm drains, inlets, and outfalls. 4. Existing buildings. 5. Existing utilities, and utilities proposed for extension. 6. Existing streets and streets proposed. C. Location Map: A small scale map or sketch of the general area, showing the relationship between the proposed subdivision and existing community facilities and rights of way, with the proposed subdivision indicated thereon. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-3-3: PRELIMINARY PLAN: The preliminary plan shall be drawn at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet (1" _ 100'), unless another scale is approved or required by the plan commission or the plan council at the preapplication conference. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 15 of 40 A. The following information shall be shown on all preliminary plans: 1. Notation stating "Preliminary Plan". 2. The name and address of the owner, the subdivider, and the engineer, surveyor, and planner preparing the plan. 3. Date, scale, and north arrow. 4. Topography - not greater than two foot (2') contour intervals. 5. The proposed subdivision name, which shall not duplicate the name of any plat previously recorded in Kendall County. 6. Location of the subdivision on a small scale drawing of the general area in which the subdivision lies, with the location of the subdivision indicated thereon, including high water elevations, if known. 7. The recorded length and bearing of the exterior boundaries of the subdivision. 8. Location and names of adjacent subdivisions and the owners ofparcels of unsubdivided land within two hundred feet (200') of property. 9. Zoning on, and contiguous to, the subdivision. 10. Location, widths, and names of all existing and platted streets, alleys, or other known public ways and easements, railroad and utility rights of way, parks, cemeteries, watercourses, permanent buildings, bridges, and other pertinent data, as determined by the plan commission on the lands proposed to be subdivided, and within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the proposed subdivision. 11. The approximate areas of all parcels of land intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use, or to be reserved in the deeds for the common use of property owners in the subdivision. 12. If the subdivision borders a lake or stream, the distances and bearings of a meander line established not less than twenty feet (20') back from the average high water mark of the lake or stream, as determined from flood hazard maps or other data, with said distance and source of data noted. 13. Approximate storm water runoff and detention/retention calculations shall be in accordance with the standard specifications for improvements. Off site tributary drainage areas and discharging routing shall be defined with supporting data as necessary for evaluation. 14. Layout and width of all new streets and rights of way, such as highways, easements for sewers and water mains, sidewalks, trees, drainageways, and other public utilities. 15. Existing trees greater than six inch (6") caliper. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 16 of 40 16. Proposed plantings. 17. Legal description. 18. Site data. (See figure 5 in standard specifications, resolution 2004-39 on file in the office of the city clerk.) 19. Routing to any proposed extensions of existing water and sewer mains, including all pipe sizes, pertinent elevations, and proposed elevations. 20. Internal utility layout, demonstrating sanitary sewer depths, water main looping, storm water routing to and from detention/retention, and locations of existing field tiles. 21. A written statement from the Kendall County soil conservation service (USDA), expressing its opinion of the suitability of the land for the type of land use proposed. 22. A field tile survey, showing locations where exploration trenches were dug, and what was found. B. The following information shall be shown for all single-family and two-family areas: 1. Approximate dimensions and minimum lot areas, in square feet. 2. Proposed building setback lines. 3. Area of property proposed to be dedicated for public use, or to be reserved by deed covenant for use of all property owners in the subdivision with the conditions of such dedication or reservation. C. The following information shall be shown for all multiple-family, commercial, industrial, and other nonresidential areas: 1. Number of units, gross and net densities. 2. Open spaces. 3. Proposed layout of structures. 4. Layout and quantities of all off street parking and loading areas. 5. Proposed building setback lines. 6. Area of property proposed to be dedicated for public use, or to be reserved by deed covenant for use of all property owners in the subdivision, with the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 7. Buffer areas. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 17 of 40 8. Square feet of buildings for commercial and industrial projects. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28- 2004) 11-3-4: FINAL PLAN: The final plan shall be drawn in ink, at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet (1" _ 100') or larger, on a nonfading, stable, Mylar material. The sheet size for plats or plans shall be not less than eighteen inches by twenty four inches (18" x 24"), nor larger than twenty four inches by thirty six inches (24" x 36"). When more than one sheet is used for any document, each sheet shall be numbered consecutively and shall contain a notation giving the total number of sheets in the document, and shall show the relation of that sheet to the other sheets. Final plans shall include all required engineering and landscaping improvements. See figure 6 in standard specifications, resolution 2004-39, on file in the office of the city clerk. A. The following information shall be shown on all final plats: 1. Legal Description: Legal descriptions shall commence at the intersections of section lines and/or quarter section lines whenreasonably practical to do so. The developer shall also submit the final plat to the city in digital form, in a format acceptable to the city. The coordinate system for the final plat shall be NAD27 Illinois state planes, east zone, U.S. foot (IL-E). 2. Monuments: All monuments erected, corners, and other points established in the field in their proper places. The material of which monuments, corners, or other points are made shall be noted as the representation thereof, or by legend, except lot corners need not be shown. 3. Exterior Boundary Lines: The exact length and bearing of all exterior boundary lines, public grounds, meander lines, and easements, unless they parallel a noted boundary. 4. Width: The exact width of all easements, streets, and alleys. 5. Lot Lines: The dimensions of all lot lines, to the nearest one-hundredth (1/loo) of a foot. 6. Setback Lines: Building setback lines on all lots. 7. Consecutive Numbering And Lettering: All lots consecutively numbered within consecutively lettered blocks. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 18 of 40 8. Lot Angles: The number of degrees, minutes, and seconds of all lot angles or bearings of same, other than ninety degrees (90°), except that when the line in any tier of lots is parallel, it shall be sufficient to mark only the outer lots. When any angle is between a curve and its tangent, the angle shown shall be that between the tangent and the main chord of the curve. When between curves of different radii, the angle between the main chords shall be shown. 9. Circular Curves: When a street is on a circular curve, the main chord of the centerline shall be drawn as a dotted line in its proper place; and, either on it, or preferably in adjoining table, shall be noted its bearing and length, the radius of the circle of which the curve is a part, and the central angle extended. The lot lines on the street sides may be shown in the same manner, or by bearings and distances. When a circular curve of thirty foot (30') radius or less is used to round off the intersection between two (2) straight lines, it shall be tangent to both straight lines; it shall be sufficient to show on the plat the radius of the curve and the tangent distances from the points of curvature to a point of intersection of the straight lines. 10. Street Names: The name of each road or street in the plat shall be printed thereon, which name shall not duplicate the name of any other street, unless it is an extension thereof. 11. Abutment: Abutting state highway lines and streets of adjoining plats shown in their proper location by dotted lines. The width and names of these streets and highways and plats shallalso be given. 12. Dedicated Lands: All lands dedicated to public use, including roads and streets, shall be clearly marked. 13. Watercourses And Drainage: All watercourses, drainage ditches, and other existing features pertinent to subdivision. 14. Access To Lakes Or Streams: Where provisions are made for access from any subdivision to any lake or stream, the plat shall show the area over which the access is provided to the lake or stream, together with a small scale drawing, clearly indicating the location of the subdivision in relation to the lake or stream, and the location of the area over which access is provided. 15. Monuments: The description and location of all survey monuments placed in the subdivision shall be shown upon final plat. Permanent monuments shall be of concrete, reinforced with one number four (4) vertical rod, and not less than four inches (4") square on top, tapered to six inches (6") square at the bottom, and thirty six inches (36") long, set flush with the adjacent ground. Each permanent monument shall have a suitable mark in the center of the top. Permanent monuments shall be erected at all corners or changes in bearing of the exterior boundary. Metal monuments not less than one-half inch (1/2") in diameter and twenty four inches (24") in length shall be placed in the ground at all lot corners, intersections of streets, intersections of streets and alleys with plat boundary lines, and at all points on street, alley, and boundary lines where there is a change in direction or curvature. All monuments and stakes shall be set in the ground before the streets and alleys are accepted for public maintenance. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 19 of 40 16. Survey: A surveyor holding a current, valid registration in Illinois shall perform the survey, and if the error in the latitude and departure closure of the survey is greater than the ratio of one in five thousand (1/5,000), the plat may be rejected. 17. Certificates Of Approval: Certificates of approval to be shown on final plat, as applicable: a. Surveyor. b. Owner. c. Notary. d. City administrator. e. Township highway commissioner, if applicable. f. County supervisor of highways, if applicable. g. Illinois department of transportation, if applicable. h. City clerk. i. City plan commission, chairman. j. Mayor. k. County clerk. I. County recorder. m. City engineer. n. School district certificate. o. Drainage overlay certificate, if applicable. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) Chapter 4 DESIGN STANDARDS http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 20 of 40 11-4-1 : GENERAL: A. When laying out a subdivision, the developer shall: 1. Take into account, and comply with, officially adopted plans; 2. Conform to existing street patterns where such streets are contiguous to the proposed subdivision or may reasonably be projected through the subdivision; 3. Design the arrangement of uses in relation to topography and drainage conditions; 4. Consider all natural features, such as streams, lakes, ponds, tree cover, etc., and incorporate these features into the development; 5. Consider street names. Streets that are extensions of, or obviously in alignment with, existing streets shall bear the name of the existing streets; however, no other streets shall bear names which duplicate or nearly duplicate so as to be confused with the names of existing streets; 6. Reserve a minimum of one historical street name from the list on file in the engineer's office, prior to the recording of final plat, as set forth in the historical street name resolution; 7. Take into account future development, including street and utility extensions; 8. Consider the implementation of traffic calming measures, which the city may require on a case by case basis. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-2: PUBLIC SITES AND OPEN SPACES: Where a proposed park, playground, school, or other public useshown on any official adopted city, township, county, or state plan or map is located in whole or in part in a subdivision, appropriate public agencies and governing bodies shall be given an opportunity http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 21 of 40 to begin, within one year from the date of recording of the final plat, procedures to acquire said acreage. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-3: STANDARDS: The united city of Yorkville "standard specifications for improvements", resolution 2004-39 on file in the city clerk's office, and the Yorkville park board "park development standards", on file in the city clerk's office, shall be incorporated herein, and shall apply to any and all development, not only subdivisions. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-4: HALF STREETS: Half streets shall be prohibited, except where essential to the reasonable development of the subdivision, and in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations, and where the plan commission finds it will be practicable to require the dedication of the other half when the adjoining property is subdivided. A right of way width of not less than forty feet (40'), and a pavement width of not less than twenty two and one-half feet (221/2'), shall be required for the half street. Where a half street is adjacent to a tract to be subdivided, the other half of the street shall be platted and constructed within such tract. In cases where half streets are accepted, the owner and subdivider shall be required to grade and improve the half street, the same as all other subdivision streets. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-5: ALLEYS: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 22 of 40 A. Alleys shall be provided in all commercial and industrial districts, except that the city may waive this requirement where another definite and assured provision is made for service access, such as off street loading and parking consistent with, and adequate for, the uses proposed. B. Alleys shall not be approved in residential areas, unless necessary because of topography or other exceptional circumstances. C. Alley widths shall be not less than twenty four feet (24'). D. Dead end alleys shall be prohibited. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-6: STREET JOGS: Street intersection jogs with centerline offsets of less than one hundred fifty feet (150') shall be prohibited. (Ord. 2004-52,9-28-2004) 11-4-7: STREET INTERSECTIONS: Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles. Proposed intersections at angles of less than eighty degrees (80°) shall not be acceptable. (Ord. 2004- 52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 23 of 40 11-4-8: BLOCKS: A. The length, width, and shapes of blocks shall be such as are appropriate for the locality and the type of development contemplated, but block length in residential areas shall not exceed one thousand three hundred twenty feet (1,320'), nor have less than sufficient width to provide two (2) tiers of lots of appropriate depth between street lines, except that one tier of lots may back onto a limited access highway, railroad right of way, or major street, provided suitable screen planting contained in a no access reservation strip along the rear property line is provided. B. Paved and fenced pedestrian crosswalks, not less than ten feet (10') wide, may be required by the plan commission through the center of blocks more than nine hundred feet (900') long, where deemed essential to provide circulation or access to schools, playgrounds, shopping centers, transportation, and other community facilities. Paving shall be three inches (3") of bituminous concrete surface course on ten inches (10") of compacted CA-6 base. Fencing shall be four foot (4') high continuous chainlink fence on both sides of the walkway on an easement. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-9: LOTS: A. All lots shall meet the minimum depth, width, and area requirements of the zoning ordinance. B. The size, shape, and orientation of lots shall be appropriate for the location of the subdivision, and for the type of development and use contemplated. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 24 of 40 C. Depth and width of properties reserved or laid out for commercial and industrial purposes shall be adequate to provide for off street service and parking facilities. D. Fronting of residential lots onto state and county highways is prohibited. Also prohibited is the fronting of residential lots onto any proposed major thoroughfare or major collectors, as designated by the comprehensive plan. Subdivision entrances for residential uses, and/or major entrances for commercial, industrial, and institutional uses shall be located not less than one thousand three hundred feet (1,300') apart, centerline tocenterline, unless topography or existing street locations dictate otherwise. E. Excessive depth in relation to width shall be avoided. F. All lots shall front or abut on a public street. G. Side lot lines shall be substantially at right angles or radial to street lines. H. Double frontage and reversed frontage lots shall be avoided, except where necessary to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation, and where a limited access highway, railroad right of way, major street, or similar situation exists; in which case, double frontage lots shall be provided with suitable screen planting contained in a no access reservation strip along the rear property line and the right of way. When deemed necessary by the plan commission, double frontage lots shall have additional depth to further protect the proposed use from rear lot line traffic. I. Subdivisions must include the entire parcel being divided, and may have no exceptions or exclusions; and shall not contain "leftover" pieces, corners, or remnants of land. J. Lot widths shall be measured at the building setback line, and may be reduced ten percent (10%) at the end of a cul-de-sac, providing the lot area meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. K. Corner lots shall have a buildable area equal to or greater than the smallest interior lot on the same block. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 25 of 40 11-4-10: EASEMENTS: A. Easements shall be provided at the rear of all lots. Such utility easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide on each lot, and normally centered upon the rear or side lot lines. Easements will be required for all storm water control facilities and for overflow routes. The city may require wider easements and easements at other locations to accommodate proposed utilities and to provide space for future utilities. B. Easements shall be provided at the side of all lots, and shall be at least five feet (5) wide on each lot, immediately adjacent to the property line. C. Easements shall be provided along both sides of all rights of way, immediately adjacent and parallel, to said right of way. This easement shall be for utilities. Evidence shall be furnished to the plan commission that the individual utility companies or the organization responsible for furnishing the service involved have reviewed easements, and any easement provisions to be incorporated on the plat or in the deeds. D. Where a watercourse, drainage channel, stream, or other body of water traverses a subdivision, appropriate dedications or easement provisions, with adequate width or construction to accommodate observed, computed, or anticipated storm water drainage through and from the subdivision, shall be made. The width of the easement shall be dependent on the area of land drained by the watercourse, and wide enough to allow access for construction and maintenance equipment. E. Screen planting easement(s) may be required in accordance with the landscape ordinance'. If said easement is to also be used for public utilities, only such plant materials that have an ultimate growth not exceeding fifteen feet (15') shall be used. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 26 of 40 Chapter 5 REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS 11-5-1 : IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO FILING FINAL PLAT: Upon approval of both the final plan and the plans and specifications for the required subdivision improvements by the plan commission, director of public works, and the city engineer, and upon approval of the appropriate agencies as evidenced by state and county permits, where required, the subdivider shall construct and install the required subdivision improvements prior to filing the final plat with the plan commission for final approval. If construction does not begin within four (4) years of final plan approval, the subdivider may be required to revise the plan to comply with new city requirements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28- 2004) 11-5-2: SUBDIVISION SECURITIES: In lieu of construction in section 11-5-1 of this chapter, the subdivider shall post with the city of Yorkville, a construction guarantee in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit or irrevocable bond, payable to the United City Of Yorkville, sufficient to cover the full cost, plus ten percent (10%), of the required improvements, as estimated by the engineer employed by the subdivider and approved by the city engineer, to assure the satisfactory installation of required improvements as outlined in this section, and contained in the approved plans and specifications. A surety or bank recognized by the state of Illinois, and approved by the city attorney, shall issue the bond or letter of credit posted, and shall carry a rating sufficient to cover the cost of construction. The subdivider shall use the standard bond form or letter of credit form used by the city of Yorkville. Construction guarantee shall not be reduced to below fifteen percent (15%) of the approved engineer's estimate prior to acceptance of the public improvements by the city. The construction guarantee shall not expire for at least one http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 27 of 40 year. Subsequent renewals of the construction guarantee shall also be for a period of at least one year. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-3: CONSTRUCTION WARRANTY: A. The subdivision irrevocable bond or letter of credit shall be released after an appropriate city council action accepting the improvements for public ownership. Except as provided in subsection B of this section, this subdivision letter of credit will not be released until a one year maintenance bond or letter of credit is posted with the city clerk for ten percent (10%) of the land improvement cost, to ensure that any and all improvements will properly function as designed, with no defects before the city council formal acceptance. B. A maintenance guarantee shall be required for all landscaping but shall not be required for improvements that are on private property that do not serve, benefit, or impact properties other than the one being developed. (Ord. 2011-03, 1-11-2011) 11-5-4: PROCEDURE: A. Not more than ten (10) months after preliminary plan approval, four (4) copies of the proposed final plans and specifications, engineer's estimates prepared and sealed by a professional engineer currently registered with the state of Illinois, and subdivision bond or letter of credit, shall be filed with the city engineer, and shall provide all necessary information for the following, as applicable: 1. Streets; 2. Curbs and gutter; http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 28 of 40 3. Storm drainage, including storm sewers and storm water detention, building storm drains (footings, roof, etc.); 4. Comprehensive drainage plan, including grades of surface drainageways; 5. Sanitary sewerage system; 6. Water supply and distribution; 7. Public utility locations; 8. Streetlights; 9. Sidewalks; 10. Street signs, guardrails, and other special requirements; 11. Parkway trees; and 12. Payment in full of all city fees. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-5: CONSTRUCTION AND INSPECTION: A. Written notice to proceed shall be obtained from the city engineer prior to beginning any work covered by the approved plans and specifications for the above improvements. Authorization to begin work will be given upon receipt of all necessary permits, including all culvert permits required when proposed new or changed subdivision roads intersect any presently existing road, and work must proceed in accordance with construction methods of this section through section 11-5-16 of this chapter, and the city's standard specifications for improvements. B. Construction of all improvements required by this title must be completed within two (2) years from the date of approval of the final plat, unless good cause can be shown for granting an extension of time. C. The subdivider shall pay all expenses incurred by the city of Yorkville to provide field inspections and testing of all construction work and materials before, during, and after construction. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 29 of 40 D. On street parking during build out of the development shall be limited to one side only of all streets. In general, parking will not be allowed on the side of the street where fire hydrants are located. The developer shall post signage, as required by the Yorkville police department. E. Dumpsters, work trailers, and construction materials shall not be stored or located in roadways or public rights of ways at any time, without exception. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28- 2004) 11-5-6: AS BUILT PLANS: After completion of all public improvements, and prior to final acceptance of said improvements, the subdivider shall make, or cause to be made, a map showing the actual location of all valves, manholes, stubs, sewer and water mains, and such other facilities as the director of public works shall require. This map shall bear the signature and seal of an Illinois registered professional engineer. The presentation of this map shall be a condition of final acceptance of the improvements, and release of the subdivision bond or letter of credit assuring their completion. The coordinate system for as built drawings shall be NAD27 Illinois state planes, east zone, U.S. foot (IL-E). The "as built" plans shall be submitted on reproducible Mylar, and also on computer diskette in a format acceptable to the city. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-7: SURVEY MONUMENTS: Permanent and any other monuments required in this title shall be installed prior to the approval of the final plat. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 30 of 40 11-5-8: ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATION, IMPROVEMENTS: A. Final acceptance of the dedication of open space or other public areas shall mean the responsibility for the maintenance of the same. Approval of the final plat does not constitute final acceptance. B. Approval of the final plat shall be dependent on presentation of proof of responsibility for the maintenance of all community improvements. C. All public improvements shall be accepted only by resolution of the city council, after a formal petition for approval has been submitted by the subdivider to the city clerk. Such petition shall be filed after completion of the public improvements. The city engineer and the director of public works shall, within thirty (30) days from receipt of such petition, make recommendations in report form to the city council. All petitions shall be acted upon by the city council within thirty (30) days from receipt of such recommendations of the city engineer and director of public works. A maintenance bond will then be required in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the cost of the land improvements, as specified in this title, after city council acceptance. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-9: STREETS: Street improvements shall be installed by the developer, shall be in accordance with the table of minimum standards herein, and in accordance with the city's standard specifications for improvements. Rights of way at intersections shall have a twenty five foot (25') radius or chord where right of way lines intersect. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 31 of 40 11-5-10: SIDEWALKS: Concrete sidewalks shall be installed by the developer within all subdivisions, on both sides of the street or roadway, to a minimum width of five feet (6), as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-11 : STREET LIGHTING: A complete, functioning streetlight system shall be installed by the developer, at his expense, in all subdivisions as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-12: SIGNAGE, GUARDRAILS, AND LANDSCAPING: A. Street signs of the quantity and type approved by the director of public works shall be installed at each intersection, and shall indicate the street names as shown on the final plat. The city shall order and install the street name signs. The subdivider shall reimburse the city for said cost. The subdivider shall also supply and install regulatory and warning signs, as directed by the Yorkville police department. B. Steel plate beam guardrails shall be placed along the shoulder of any street where street construction has resulted in an embankment greater than six feet (6) in height. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 32 of 40 C. All areas of street right of way that are not paved shall be seeded or sodded. Provisions shall be made to assure the growth of all landscaping. D. All improvements herein shall be as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-13: STORM WATER DRAINAGE: A. Surface water drainage improvements consisting of storm sewers and/or open channels, inlets, catch basins, manholes, and/or detention facilities, shall be designed and constructed to adequately drain the area being developed, and also all of such other areas that naturally drain through the area being developed. B. If the surface water drainage will be changed by the construction of the subdivision, adequate provision shall be made for collection and diversion of such surface waters into public areas, or drains which the subdivider has a right to use, and such surface waters shall not be deposited on the property of adjoining landowners, in such a manner as to cause erosion or other damage. C. Designed planning of surface water drainage facilities shall be performed by, or under the supervision of, a professional engineer, registered in the state of Illinois. The storm water drainage system shall be as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. D. It will be the homeowner's responsibility to maintain any drainage course across his property, and to keep it free from features that restrict natural drainage. (Ord. 2004-52, 9- 28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 33 of 40 11-5-14: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: All subdivisions and units therein shall be required to provide connection to the sanitary sewer system, including required sewer extensions off site, to the sizes and depths as required by the city. The sanitary sewers shall be extended to the far boundaries of the development, as directed by the city. All costs of these improvements will be borne by the developer. The sanitary sewer system shall be as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-15: WATER SYSTEM: All subdivisions and units therein shall be required to provide connection to the united city of Yorkville's public water supply system, including required water main extensions off site, to the sizes required by the city, and all costs shall be borne by the developer. All developments must provide a looped, double fed water system, and extensions to the boundaries of the development, as directed by the city, shall also be included in the water system, to be funded by the developer. The water system shall be as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-16: OVERSIZING OF UTILITIES: A. When, in any subdivision, now within the city, or within one and one-half (111/2) miles of the city limits, which normally would require a certain size water main, sanitary sewer, and/or storm sewer, but which for the purpose of complying with the plan of development of the http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 34 of 40 city's comprehensive plan, to provide adequate utilities, not only to the particular subdivision, but also to subdivisions which in the future may become a part of the city, and where the city engineer and the director of public works have determined that water and/or sewer mains of a larger diameter are required, then the city engineer or the director of public works shall inform the subdivider, builders, and developers of the subdivision by a written notice of that fact, and require them to install such oversized utilities and at the same time, in said notice, inform them of the size(s) to be installed. B. Water main shall be considered oversized if it is larger than the size needed to supply the required fire flows of the development, not the minimum pipe size allowed by ordinance. The required fire flow rate for all residential areas shall be one thousand five hundred (1,500) gpm. The required fire flow rate for commercial and industrial areas shall be three thousand two hundred fifty (3,250) gpm. The required fire flow rate within five hundred feet (500') of a school site shall be three thousand three hundred seventy five (3,375) gpm. C. Upon being so notified as provided for in this section, no subdivider, builder, or developer shall install any utility in such subdivision of any size other than that specified to him by the aforesaid notice. D. At such time as the installation of said oversized utilities shall have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to the city of such installation, and also in accordance with the notice specified in this section, and all such installations shall have been inspected and approved by the city as provided for by the ordinances of the city of Yorkville, then the city may enter into an agreement to allow the developer to recover the difference of the cost at current prices, as of the time of said installation, between the development's required utilities which were originally planned to be used, and the cost of the oversized utilities which the city directed to be used. Said agreement may be in the form of a recapture agreement, cash payment(s), rebates of fees to the developer, or some other consideration as may be approved by the city council. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) Chapter 6 ADMINISTRATION http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 35 of 40 11-6-1 : BUILDING PERMIT: No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any building, structure, or improvement to the land, or any lot within a "subdivision" as defined herein, which has been approved for platting or replatting, until all requirements of this title have been fully complied with. In no case will a building permit be issued until all fees have been paid, a grading plan approved, an "all weather" road in place to serve this property, along with functioning drainage facilities, water system, and sanitary sewer system. Exceptions may be made for model home units. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-6-2: CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: A certificate of occupancy may be issued for the use of any structure within a subdivision approved for platting or replatting provided that all required utilities have been installed and are capable of servicing the subdivision, all roadways have the bituminous binder laid, and mutual agreement between the city engineer and the building code official has transpired. The final grading plan must be submitted and approved prior to a certificate of occupancy. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-6-3: VARIATIONS: A. Where the zoning board of appeals finds that extraordinary hardships or particular difficulties may result from the strict compliance with this title, the zoning board of appeals is hereby empowered to consider such matters after receiving written application http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 36 of 40 from the subdivider. If applicable, the zoning board of appeals may recommend, in writing, to the city council, variations or exceptions to the regulations, subject to specified conditions, so that substantial justice may be done and the public interest secured, provided that such variations or exceptions shall not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this title or the comprehensive plan. B. The standards and requirements of this title may be modified in the case of large scale developments when the zoning board of appeals finds that a plan and program for a new village, complete community, shopping center, industrial park, or neighborhood unit provides adequate public open spaces and improvements forcirculation, recreation, and service needs of the tract when fully developed, and which also provides such covenants or other legal provisions to assure conformity and achievement of the plan. C. The zoning board of appeals shall not recommend variations or exceptions to the regulations of this title unless it shall make findings based upon the evidence presented in each specific case, that: 1. Due to the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topography conditions of the specific property involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations was carried out. 2. The conditions upon which the request for a variation is based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not applicable, generally to other properties within the same zoning classification. 3. The alleged hardship was not created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public safety, health, welfare, or interest to other properties or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. D. Variation requests that affect surrounding properties under the circumstances below shall not be approved: 1. Impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties; 2. Substantial increase in the traffic congestion in public streets; 3. Increase the danger of fire; 4. Endanger the public safety; 5. Significantly diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood; or http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 37 of 40 6. Noncompliance with the spirit of intent of the restrictions imposed by the zoning ordinance. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) Chapter 7 AMENDMENTS 11-7-1 : INITIATION OF AMENDMENT: The mayor and city council, the plan commission, the zoning board of appeals, or any resident of the city of Yorkville, or any person residing within one and one-half (11/2) miles of the corporate limits of the city, may propose amendments. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-7-2: PROCESSING APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT: A. Filed With Clerk: An application for an amendment shall be filed with the city clerk. The application shall be accompanied by such plans or data, and such other information, as specified by the plan commission, and shall include a statement, in writing, by the applicant and adequate evidence showing that the proposed amendments will conform to the standards set forth herein. Copies of such application shall be forwarded by the city council to the plan commission with the request to hold a public hearing. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 38 of 40 B. Publication: The city clerk shall cause a notice of time, place, and purpose of such hearing to be published in a newspaper published within the city of Yorkville, not more than thirty (30) days nor less than fifteen (15) days in advance of such hearing. C. Hearing On Application: Upon receipt in proper form of the application and statement referred to above, the plan commission shall hold at least one public hearing on the proposed amendment. However, the plan commission may continue from time to time the hearing without further notice being published. D. Findings Of Fact And Recommendation Of The Plan Commission: Within forty five (45) days after the close of the hearing on a proposed amendment, the plan commission shall make written findings of fact, and shall submit same, together with its recommendations to the mayor and city council. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-7-3: DECISIONS: A. The mayor and city council, upon receiving the recommendation of the plan commission, may grant or deny any proposed amendment in accordance with applicable Illinois statutes, or may refer tothe plan commission for further consideration. B. If a recommendation submitted by the plan commission to the city council for a proposed amendment is not acted upon by the city council within forty five (45) days of the date upon which such application is received by the mayor and city council, it shall be deemed to have been approved. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 39 of 40 Chapter 8 FEE SCHEDULE 11-8-1: LAND CASH CONTRIBUTIONS: Subdividers shall comply with any school and/or park land cash ordinance in effect at the time of final plat approval. The city may require that all or part of the park cash contribution be paid prior to recording any final plat of subdivision of a development. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28- 2004) 11-8-2: FEES: Before the plan commission approves the final plat, the subdivider shall pay to the united city of Yorkville, all fees, reimbursements, and/or deposits due at that time for any of the subdivider's developments in the city. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-8-3: COORDINATION FEE: A. A coordination fee will be assessed for all new subdivisions, platting or replatting of existing subdivisions or where engineering review is necessary by city ordinance, statute, or ordinance when the review is completed by an outside engineering consultant. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 40 of 40 B. The coordination fee will be charged from the time of initial contact to the time of final plat and plan approval, and will cover all normal city expenses. C. The coordination fee will be charged at the rate of 0.35 percent of the approved engineer's estimate of cost of all land improvements, as defined in the Yorkville subdivision control ordinance, and will be due prior to the recording of the final plat of subdivision. (Ord. 2006-11, 2-28-2006) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Exhibit 1 RESOLUTION FOR THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR EVOROVEMENTS Resolution No.,� 3 These Standards apply to all infrastructure improvements, and may be modified as needed upon the advice of the City 9ngineer for special identified situations or conditions. All contractors shall kiive the City Engineer's office a minimum 48-hour notice of all work and of all required approvals. Failure to obtain these required approvals will require extensive testing,removal and replacement, and a ban for a minimum of one year, from working on the City's right-of-way. Subdividers that have been unfaithful in previous City agreements or developments, or who owe the City payments, will not be allowed to have work performed for them within the public right-of-way. Resident engineering inspection shall be provided through the City Engineer's office, and all such costs shall be charged to the developer by the United City of Yorkville. Required written approvals will not be given until outstanding bills are paid in full. The developer's improvement Letter of Credit or other subdivision securities will also be liable for all such costs. The developer shall be responsible for layout and staking engineering;as well as for record drawings by a registered Professional Engineer. These Specifications for Improvements shall become a part of each and every project approved by the United City of Yorkville, and no other specifications will take precedence. All improvements included in the United City of Yorkville's Standard Specifications for Improvements, unless noted herein, shall conform to the latest editions of the State of Illinois"Standard Specifications for Road and bridge Construction", the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices", and all amendments thereto. These documents shall be considered as included within the City of Yorkville Standard Specifications for Improvements, and in the case of a conflict of requirements, the most stringent shall apply. Prior to starting construction of any project,the developer shall attend a pre-construction meeting and bring a representative from each contractor, a list of all contact persons that can be reached at any time, and a complete schedule of all work to be performed. No work is to start until the City Engineer and the City Administrator have approved the engineering plans, and the pre-construction meeting has been held. The City Engineer must approve any changes to the approved plans in writing. The City Engineer or a representative will,upon discovery of improper material or installation practices, issue a written document to the contractor, stating that failure to stop and correct such deficiencies will-result in the City's refusal to accept such improvements or to issue any further building permits,or to perform required inspections. The subdivider shall obtain and keep in force insurance coverage for Worker's Compensation, and Employer's Liability, Commercial General Liability, Commercial Automobile Liability, and Umbrella Liability,as described in IDOT's "Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction". The United City of Yorkville shall be named as an additional insured_ The insurance coverage shall remain in effect until the City accepts the entire development. The City will not consider acceptance of the public improvements in a development until it is at least fifty (50)percent built out,or three years after the roadway binder course is paved,whichever is sooner. Blasting will not be allowed September 27,2004 Standard Spmifications for Impmvcmmts ROADS All roadways shall conform to the Illinois Department of Transportation (hereinafter termed IDOT) "Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction", unless modified herein.. Horizontal and vertical geometric for right-of-ways and roadways shall conform to the City Standards,listed in Figure 2. Surface course must not be placed until at least severity- (70%) percent of the adjacent, private improvements are in place. However, in no case shall the surface course be placed until the binder course has been in place for at least one full winter season. In no case shall the surface course be delayed more than three(3)years after the binder course has been installed. The subgrade shall be graded and compacted to a hard,uniform surface,matching the slopes of the surface course. It shall have no rutting and shall completely drain to the outer edges. It shall be proof rolled by the contractor with a fully loaded(gravel) 10-cubic yard dump truck and witnessed by and approved in writing by the City Engineer's representative (hereafter termed City Engineer) before proceeding to build the roadway. All unsuitable subgrade shall be removed and replaced with compacted, stable clay material or shall be replaced with compacted CA6 limestone on an approved, non-woven roadway fabric (6.5 oz. minimum). Other geo-grids may be required for certain conditions. All bituminous mixtures shall be delivered and handled so that the bituminous mixture immediately behind the paver screen is at or above 270 degrees F. All asphalt delivered to the project shall be covered when the temperature is at or below 70 degrees F. All subgrades, other than approved granular subgrades, shall be completely covered with a subgrade fabric (Amoco 4551 or approved equal), with a full 18 inches of overlap. Subgrade Fabric shall also be used on lime-stabilized sub grades. It shall be placed neat and tight, without wrinkles, tears, or defects. Construction equipment shall not be allowed to drive on the fabric until it has a minimum of four inches cover of granular base material. The City Engineer shall approve in writing the subgrade fabric installation prior to placing base material. The subgrade fabric shall extend a minimum of twelve inches beyond the back of each curb. In areas where undercutting of the subgrade is required, the bottom of the excavation shall be lined with a woven geotextile(Amoco 2002 or approved equal),and backfilled with CA-3 aggregate. The aggregate base course shall be compacted to a minimum of 45%Modified Proctor and shall be free of all dirt and debris. The course shall be proof rolled,as described above, and witnessed by and approved in writing by the City Engineer before proceeding to build the roadway. A bituminous prime coat shall be applied to the aggregate base course prior to paving. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be placed only upon the written approval of the City Engineer. All asphalt must be laid utilizing a good-quality, properly-functioning, tracked or wheeled asphalt laying machine, utilizing fully-automatic, electronic sensing control from a stringline for the initial course, and from a minimum fifteen(15') foot ski for all other lifts. The bituminous binder course shall be proof rolled as described above, and witnessed by, and approved in writing, by the City Engineer before proceeding with the surface course. All repairs must be made as directed by the City Engineer. All bituminous pavement patches shall be at least fifty(50%)percent thicker than the pavement being patched. Also,the binder course shall be bump tested by the contractor, and witnessed by the City Engineer, and all areas exceeding one-half inch (1/2'1 bumps, including header joints and any patch joints, shall receive a leveling course prior to surfacing. Areas of excessive patching will automatically receive a level course prior to surfacing. Prior to any leveling course or surface course,the streets shall be flushed clean and free of all dirt and debris. A bituminous tack coat will be required. Minimum temperature requirements for laying asphalt will be 5 degrees F higher than that allowed by IDOT specifications. S-2 Standard Specifications for improvements The bituminous concrete surface course shall be placed only upon the written approval of the City Engineer. All asphalt must be laid utilizing good-quality,properly functioning,tracked or wheeled asphalt laying machine, utilizing fully automatic, electronic sensing control from a minimum 15-foot ski. The surface course shall be bump tested by the contractor, and witnessed by the City Engineer_ All bump test penalties specified by IDOT specifications shall be quadrupled,and areas that have an excessive amount of one�half inch(1/2")bumps shall be completely removed and replaced, not just the bump itself Minimum temperature requirements for laying bituminous surface course will be five (5) degrees E higher than that allowed by IDOT specifications. The surface elevation of the asphalt at the concrete gutter shall be 1/ inch higher than that of the adjacent concrete. All streets shall have a cross slope of 2% from the centerline to the concrete curb. Areas of segregated binder course and/or surface course shall be removed and replaced at the direction of the City Engineer. Segregated asphalt is the uneven distribution of course and fine materials in the asphalt characterized by pavement textures different from the surrounding material, and can usually be seen by the naked eye. Pavements constructed from Portland Cement Concrete shall be designed in conformance with American. Concrete Pavement Association Publications IS 184P and IS 061P,as amended. Combination concrete curb and gutter will be required on all roadways. All curb and gutter shall be placed on an aggregate base with a minimum thickness of four inches, but in no case shall the curb and gutter subgrade be higher than one inch below the adjacent roadway subgrade. The height of the gutter flag shall be ten (10") inches, unless directed otherwise by the City Engineer. As noted previously, the roadway subgrade fabric will extend over the curb and gutter subgrade, and beyond by a minrrnum of twelve (12") inches. The concrete curb and gutter shall be reinforced with two #4 deformed bars, placed three (3") inches from the bottom,spaced twelve(12")inches apart,centered on the total width of the curb and gutter. Machine-planed concrete curb and gutter is to be utilized wherever practical., utilizing a minimum Class X concrete, and a five (5%) percent minimum air-entrainment, Plastizers will be allowed, but chlorides will not An approved spray-on curing compound with red fugitive coloring shall be applied immediately after finishing, and a sealer, WR Meadows TIAC, or approved equal, shall be applied after seven. days. The resident engineer shall be notified of these applications, and proof of purchase,with material specifications, will be required. The concrete curb and gutter shall have the required slip bar expansion joints,and 1% inch deep sawed contraction joints will be required every 15-20 feet, within 24 hours after each pour. Minor honeycombing on the two outer,vertical surfaces will be allowed,but they must be patched in an approved manner,and witnessed by the City Engineer,prior to backfilling. The clay backfill behind the curb shall be placed and compacted prior to placing aggregate base course. Roadway extensions and stubs will be required as part of the development, with full improvements where needed, for future gro*th Additional lanes, access improvements, traffic signalization, etc., may be required., at the developer's expense. The developer shall reimburse the City for two of each street name and regulatory signs and posts required, and the City will install them. All signs shall be high-intensity, as approved by the Director of Public Works. All pavement markings shall be thermoplastic. The developer shall reimburse the City for the cost of replacing any signs that are missing, stolen, or damaged prior to final acceptance. The developer, to comply with these Standard Specifications for Improvements, shall improve existing roadways running through,or adjacent to,the development. S-3 Standard Specifications for Improvements Half-streets are discouraged, but where they are necessary, on advice of the City Engineer, the minimum width street will be twenty-four (24') feet from the edge of pavement to the back of curb, on the development side of the roadway. Street lighting, sidewalk, and landscaping on the development side will be required. Temporary tee turn-arounds will be required on all streets stubbed for future roadway extension, as recommended by the City Engineer, and shown on the Final Plat. Paving for the tee will extend from right-of-way line to right-of-way line, to a length of fifteen(15') feet, and two radii of fifteen (151) feet The pavement beyond the road edge shall be three (3") inches of bituminous concrete surface course, on a ten- (10") inch CA6 aggregate-compacted base, with pavement fabric. Concrete curb and gutter will not be required around the tee, and sidewalk will not required through the tee. The developer extending the street in the future shall remove the excess paving and base, place topsoil, and seed the area disturbed, construct the additional curbing so that the curb and gutter is continuous and uninterrupted from one development to another, and resurface for a distance of thirty (30') feet, including header joints, as approved by the City Engineer. When a development includes construction along State and County highways, or other heavily traveled road, the developer shall post advance-warning signs. The developer shall consult with the Yorkville Police Department concerning the types and locations of signs, and shall obtain a permit from the appropriate jurisdictional agency prior to erecting the signage. The City may require the roadway design to include traffic-calming measures. These measures may include, but not be limited to, curvilinear roadway layout, landscaping beyond the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance,traffic tables,and fog lines. if a development includes the construction or modifications of traffic signals, the new signals shall be designed to have light-emitting diode (LED) lights. The traffic signal shall also have a battery backup device. All new roadways shall be designed in accordance with IDOT Circular 95-11, or the most recently adopted IDOT standard for the design of flexible and full-depth bituminous pavements. The following minimum design criteria shall be used when applying the design method: Design period=20 years Class U Roadway Traffic Factor Equations for 80,000 lb.Vehicles 2.0%traffic growth rate AC viscosity of AC-20 Subgrade Support Rating of Fair Local Residential Roadways Local Residential Roadways are intended to carry an average daily traffic(ADT)volume of less than 1000. The right-of-way width shall be 66 feet. The bituminous concrete surface course shall be a minimum of 1.5 inches in thickness of Class 'T' Superpave mixture. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be a minimum of 2.5 inches in thickness. The aggregate stone base shall be lJ0 inches in thickness of clean, crushed CA-6 gradation gravel or limestone. The roadways shall be bound with B-6.12 combination concrete curb and gutter to a width of thirty feet from back of curb to back of curb (B-B). The street radius for all intersecting streets shall be a minimum of thirty feet to the back of curb. The edge of pavement shall be cleaned and sealed with rubberized asphalt cement hot-poured joint sealer. Estate Residential Roadways Estate Residential Roadways are intended to carry an average daily traffic(ADT)volume of less than 1000. The right-of-way width shall be 70 feet The bituminous concrete surface course shall be a minimum of 1.5 inches in thickness of Class "T' Superpave mixture. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be a minimum of 2.5 inches in thickness. The aggregate stone base shall be ten inches in thickness of clean, crushed CA-6 gradation gravel or limestone..The roadway surface shall be 28 feet wide with two 12.5-foot wide through-lanes. The lane edges shall be striped with a four-inch thermoplastic pavement marking. The roadway up to and including the aggregate stone base shall be 32 feet wide to provide a 2-foot wide aggregate shoulder (nominal thickness of at least 12 inches), and also to allow for future widening. Mailbox turnouts will be paved,using driveway specifications to determine thickness. S-4 Standard Specifications far lmprovrmmts Minor Collector Roadways Minor Collector Roadways are intended to carry 1000-2500 ADT. The right-of-way width shall be 70 feet. The bituminous concrete surface course shall be a minimum of 1.5 inches in thickness of Class "I" Superpave mixture. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be a minimum of 4.5 inches in thickness. The aggregate stone base shall be 12 inches in thickness of clean, crushed CA-6 gradation gravel or limestone. The roadways shall be bound with B-6.12 combination concrete curb and gutter to a width of 34 feet B-B. The street radius for all intersecting streets shall be a minimum of thirty feet to the back of curb. Minor collector roadways may provide direct access to adjacent private lots. The edge of pavement shall be cleaned and sealed with rubberized asphalt cement hot-poured joint sealer. Collector Roadwa s and Commercial/Industrial Roadways Collector Roadways are intended to carry 2500-12,000 ADT. The right-of-way width shall be 80 feet These design standards shall also apply to all roadways directly serving commercial or industrial zoned areas. The bituminous concrete surface course shall be a minimum of 1.5 inches in thickness of Class "I" Superpave mixture. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be a minimum of 4.5 inches in thickness. The aggregate stone base shall be 12 inches in thickness of clean, crushed CA-6 gradation gravel or limestone. The roadways shall be bound with B-6.12 combination concrete curb and gutter to a width of 39 feet B-B. The street radius for all intersecting streets shall be a minimum of 40 feet to the back of curb. Collector roadways shall not provide direct access to adjacent lots in residential-zoned areas. The edge of pavement shall be cleaned and sealed with rubberized asphalt cement hot-poured joint sealer. Manor Collector Roadways Major Collector Roadways are intended to carry more than 12,000 ADT. The right-of-way width shall be 100 feet The bituminous concrete surface course shall be a minimum of 1.5 inches in thickness of Class "I" Superpave mixture. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be a minimum of six inches in thickness (2 lifts required). The aggregate stone base shall be 16 inches in thickness of clean,crushed CA- 6 gradation gravel or limestone. The roadways shall be bound with B-7.18 combination concrete curb and gutter to a width of 51 feet(four 12-foot lanes)B-B. The City Engineer may require an additional 12-foot center turn lane, as deemed appropriate. The street radius for all intersecting streets shall be a minimum of 50 feet to the back of curb. The edge of pavement shall be cleaned and sealed with rubberized asphalt cement hot-poured joint sealer. An alternative bituminous base course may be approved by the City Engineer, and B6-18 or B6-24 combination concrete curb and gutter may be required,based upon specific site drainage needs. r Boulevards Boulevard-style roadways shall have a minimum width of 28 feet B-B for approaches to intersections. The minimum pavement width in other areas shall be 20 feet B B. SIDEWALK Non-reinforced, concrete sidewalks will be required on both sides of all roadways. They shall be a minimum of four (4') feet wide where four (4') feet wide walks now exist, and five (5') felt wide in all other locations. All sidewalks shall be five (5") inches in thickness. They will be a minimum of six (6") inches in thickness across driveway approaches. All sidewalks shall have an aggregate base of CA 7,with a minimum thickness of two inches (five inches across driveway approaches). All concrete shall be Class X,with a minimum of five(5 0/6)percent air-entrainments. Sidewalks shall slope two (2%)percent towards the street Approved curing and sealing compounds are required,as specified previously for concrete curb and gutter. The back of the sidewalk shall be placed twelve(12')inches from the right-of-way line,unless directed otherwise. The sidewalk shall have a light broom finish. Formed contraction joints are required, at a spacing of five(5') feet. Expansion joint material, one-half inch in thickness, and full-depth, shall be placed every 100 feet The subgrade for the sidewalk shall be uniform,neat, and compacted to a minimum 90%modified proctor. S-5 Standard Specifications for Improvements Spalling or chips will not be allowed to be patched. All such areas will be removed from contraction joint to contraction joint, and replaced. All sidewalks will be in place prior to acceptance of the public improvements by the City, which includes in front of vacant lots. These areas must be protected during future construction. No sidewalks are required in Estate-residential subdivisions. However, in the event sidewalks are not provided, a paved trail that abuts every lot must be provided, that meets the City's standards, specifically a ten (10') foot width, with an exit and entrance identification, consisting of two (2") inches of asphalt on eight(8") inches of CA6 aggregate. Dedicated easements at least fifteen (15') feet wide must be provided for the trail. DRIVE APPROACHES Drive approaches must be constructed to one of the following: 1. Six inches, minimum of Class X concrete„ with a minimum of five (5%) percent air-entrainment, over six inches minimum CA6 aggregate base over a 90%modified proctor compacted subgrade, with curing and sealing treatments, as specified above,under concrete curb and gutter. Expansion joint material, one-half (1/2'1 thick and full-depth, shall be installed at the curb and at the sidewalk. 2. Two inches, minimum of Class I bituminous concrete surface course, over a minimum base of eight (8") inches of CA6 aggregate over a 90% modified proctor compacted subgrade. The concrete sidewalk will be constructed through the drive approach,and any construction damage to the concrete sidewalk or curb will cause removal and replacement of those improvements. Drive approaches will not be constructed steeper than eight(8 0/c)percent_ 3. In Estate-residential subdivisions, all driveways must be paved with brick, asphalts or concrete, and must have a concrete culvert with flared end sections. Culvert diameter shall be twelve (12") inches or greater,as required by the City. PARKWAYS AND PARK SITES All parkways, park sites, and other open spaces shall be landscaped and designed in accordance with the City of Yorkville's Landscape Ordinance and the Park Development Standards, as amended from time to time. Any existing trees within a development deemed by the Parks Department and Public Works Department to be dead, dying, or of an undesirable species shall be removed by the developer. The developer shall not remove or cut down any trees without the prior consent of the Parks Department and Public Works Department,or as indicated in the approved landscape plan. STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM All streets shall have a complete street lighting system designed by a professional engineer. A street light will be required at all intersections, all curves,at all ends of cul-de-sacs, and at a maximum spacing of 300 feet. In Estate-residential subdivisions, street lights shall be required at intersections, and at a maximum spacing of 500 feet,with lights also placed at curves and a he.end of dead-end streets. The poles shall be concrete with butt-type foundations. The City Engineer may require a streetlight to be placed at other points, as may be necessary in the public interest in unusual or special conditions. They shall be located at side lot lines, and on the opposite side of the street from the water main.,wherever possible,and shall be set two feet from back of curb to face of pole. Occupancy permits cannot be issued until all streetlights in that phase of the development are installed,complete,and operational. S-b Standard Spe6f=tims for Improvements All exterior lighting of private property in new developments shall be designed, located, and mounted at heights no greater than twenty(20')feet above grade for non-cutoff lights,and forty-(40') feet above grade for cutoff lights. The lighting plan, photometrics, and shop drawings for lighting equipment shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Glare shall be minimized to the extent practical by orienting lights away from the public right-of-way and abutting properties, or by planting vegetation to provide screening. Exterior lighting shall be designed, located, and mounted so that the maximum illumination measured horizontally at the lot line does not exceed one(1') foot-candle. Light Distribution: Luminaries of the Type II distribution as approved by the Illuminating Engineering Society (herein termed IES) shall be used, except at intersections where Type II or Type IV IES distribution shall be used. The City Engineer may designate the IES Type V distribution h mi*±ar es be used in the public interest under unusual or special conditions. Individual Control: On individual control of lights,the photoelectric control shall be mounted on top of the luminare. Line Drop: Voltage drop shall be no greater than three (3 0/c.) percent from power supply to the last pole, with no wire size smaller than No. Six (6) Type RHIH or RHW Underground Service Cable (USC). All streetlights shall operate at I20 volts,except for those on major streets. Power Supply Location: Connection to the power supply shall be made to comply with Commonwealth Edison Company rules and regulations,as amended fro time to tame. Conduit: All driveways, street, and sidewalk crossovers shall have two (2") inches of HD PVC conduit, used as raceways for underground cable. Underground Cable: All underground cable shall be direct buried cable,placed at a depth at least thirty- (30") inches below the normal finished grade. Three cables (Black, White, Green) shall be run from the pole to the power supply. Any underground cable broken more than once prior to Final Acceptance shall be replaced from the power source to the pole or from pole to pole. S Ip ices: All cable on the underground cable section shall be continuous, and no splicing shalll be made underground. All necessary splices shall be made above ground level. Underground Cable Location: Underground cable shall be installed in a trench not less than two feet from the back of the curb, except that in no case shall the underground cable be installed under the sidewalk. Grounding: A copper-clad ground rod shall be placed at each pole. The rod shall be mirfmum 5l8-inch diameter,and ten(10') feet long. Fusing: All underground feeders shall be fused at or below their rated capacity. Each standard shall contain in-line fuse holders, with proper fusing in series with each underground conductor to protect the luminare located on that pole. Maintenance Prior to Acce tance: Once streetlights are operational, the Yorkville Public Works Department shall perform normal maintenance, even though the Yorkville City Council has not accepted the streetlight system. Normal maintenance consists of investigating the cause of an outage, and repairing it if the cause is a burned out lamp, fuse, or photocell. All other repairs shall be referred to the developer. The cost of performing normal maintenance prior to acceptance by the Yorkville City Council shall be paid from a"Streetlight Normal Maintenance' deposit established by the developer prior to recording the Final Plat The deposit shall be$300.00 per pole, or other such amount, as may be determined by the Yorkville City Council, from time to time. If the deposit proves insufficient,the developer shall replenish the deposit within thirty- (30) days of written request by the City Engineer. The Yorkville City Council shall return any unused funds to the developer upon acceptance of the streetlight system- S-7 Standard Specifications for Improvements Streetlight Standard and Bracket: Local streets shall use 906 B 19-AD4, American Concrete Company pole and bracket, or approved equal. Luminare shall be mounted 19'9" above the street, shall have a four- (4')foot arm. The pole shall be buried a minimum of five(5')feet below grade and backfilled with crushed CA6 limestone, watered, and compacted around the butt of the pole. The bracket is to be furnished with the pole. The luminare shall be a General Electric Company No.M2RR15S1N2AMS3F, or approved equal with the 1-114"side mount built-in ballast. The luminaries shall be fitted with General Electric Company"Lucalox" high-pressure sodium lamps LU 150/551D, or approved equal, with GE Company ANSI specification "S55" high-pressure sodium ballasts (or approved equal) or American Electric 115 15-S-RN-120-R2-DA- 4B. Maior Collector Streets: The lighting pole shall be Stress Crete E340-BPO-G, with Style 210 low rise tapered aluminum davit, or approved equals. The davit outreach length shall be eight (8') feet The Iuminare shall be mounted thirty- (30') feet above the street. The pole shall have an embedment depth of five(5')feet, and be backfilled with CA 6 limestone. The streetlight system shall be operated through controller(s) in ground-mounted cabinets. The controller and luminare shall operate at 240 volts. The controller shall be housed in a pad-mounted Type NEMA 3R enclosure. The exterior of the cabinet shall have a bronze tone powder-coat finish. The approximate dimensions of the cabinet shall be 42"H x 36"W x 12"D. A Com Ed meter socket shall be provided on the exterior of the cabinet. The manufacturer or distributor shall guarantee streetlight standards, luminaries,ballast, lamps, and cables for their proper use,for one year,from the date of acceptance. Testing: The subdivider shall manually trigger the photocell in order to have each street light bum continuously for at least 48 hours. During this burn test, amperage readings shall be taken, and must be within ten(10%)percent of the connected load,based on equipment ratings. Parking Lot Lighting: Parking lots in areas zoned Business, Residential, or Office-Research, shall be provided with Iighting necessary to achieve a minimum average of 2.0 foot-candles,as measured across the entire parking lot, and a maximum of 1.0 foot-candles,as measured at the adjoining property lines. Parking lots in areas zoned Manufacturing shall have a minimum average lighting intensity of one foot-candles,per square foot. Lighting shall be designed to avoid casting direct light or glare onto adjacent residential property. STORM SEWER SYSTEM A complete storm sewer system shall be required,consisting of closed conduits to an approved storm water storage system. All storm sewers within the public right-of-way and easements parallel to and adjacent to public right-of-way shall be reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), with a twelve (12") inch minimum diameter. Storm sewers in rear yards and side yards may be high-density polyethylene(H.D.P.E.) of a manufacturer and design, to be approved by the City of Yorkville. All roadways will have a system of inlets/catch basins,tied directly to the storm sewer. These storm water collection locations will be on both sides of the street, with a maximum longitudinal flow interval of 300 feet. All such collection points will be an inlet except the last structure before entering a storm sewer main shall be a catch basin with a two-foot sump. Catch basins or open-lid structures shall not be located over the sewer main. All backfill is to be a CA7 aggregate. All storm sewer roadway crossings from structure to structure must be backfilled with CA7 aggregate and completely encapsulated in an approved drainage fabric. In this manner,the curb subgrade, the storm crossings, and the inlets and catch basins create a roadway underdrain system for longer roadway life. The City may require that storm sewers be constructed along the centerline of individual roadways at certain locations. Those locations shall normally be limited to within 100 feet of the lowest sag vertical curve of a roadway. Where these locations occur within a horizontal curve of the roadway, storm manholes shall be placed at the centerline of individual roadways. S-8 Standard Specifications for Improvements If subgrade conditions are excessively sensitive to moisture or other special conditions, a capped, perforated, plastic underdrain may be required under the curb and gutter. All storm water conduits 12" diameter and larger shall be internally televised in color just prior to City acceptance, and shall be free of defects, sags, dirt, and debris. All non-RCP storm sewers shall also be mandrel tested(similar to sanitary sewer testing)just prior to City acceptance.All parking lots shall be drained internally,and directed by pipe to the storm sewer. Storm sewers shall extend to the limits of the development with proper sizing, as approved by the City Engineer,based upon current and future runoff conditions,to pick up and safely carry through the development any and all upstream bypass flows. All new homes with basements or crawl spaces shall have a direct,underground conduit to the storm sewer system. Fill-in lots in areas with no storm sewer within 500 feet shall not be required to have this direct connection. Minimum depth of cover for these lines shall be 30 inches. All discharges shall have an approved automatic diverter calve immediately outside the house and a check valve inside the house. Multiple collection lines of four inch and six inch HD PVC will be allowed by an approved design. Terminal and junction points shall be at two-foot diameter precast concrete inlets with open-lid castings. The pipe from the house shall be a 2" minimum HD PVC with cemented joints. The connection to the storm sewer shall be through a neat, tight fitting,bored hole into the concrete pipe. After insertion of the sump pump discharge pipe into the concrete storm sewer pipe, the joint shall be sealed with hydraulic cement In no case shall the sump pump discharge pipe extend beyond the inner surface of the concrete storm sewer pipe. Connections,however,shall be into a structure wherever practical. Individual storm sewer services shall not be required in areas of the development where soil and ground water conditions indicate that sump pumps would run very infrequently. If the developer does not wish to install storm sewer services, he shall perform soil borings at regular intervals (300' to 400' grid typical) during the Final Plan preparation stage, to determine soil types and ground water elevations. Boring locations are subject to approval by the City. Each boring shall extend at least 20 feet below existing ground elevations and be referenced to the development benchmarks. If the boring logs show granular soil and also show ground water elevations at least five(5') feet below planned basement floor elevations, then individual storm sewer services shall not be required in that area of the development During excavation of every basement in that area, the developer shall verify(with.City representative present) that the granular soil and deep ground water conditions exist If either condition is found not to exist at a building location, the developer shall construct a storm sewer service to that building, in conformance with these Standard Specifications. The design of the storm water collection system shall be for a ten(10) year storm, running lust full. The only exception to this is where the receiving storm water system has less capacity and here the new system of conduits shall be designed for a five(5)year event,running just full. The minimum velocity shall-be 2.5 fps and the maximum shall be 8 fps. The storm sewer pipe shall have a minimum cover of three (3') feet. Stone sewer manholes shall be five(5') feet internal diameter,constructed of reinforced concrete, and shall be placed at a maximum spacing of 500 feet. Storm sewer manholes may be four(4') feet internal diameter when the largest sewer entering/leaving the manhole is 18" diameter, and the orientation of sewers connecting to the manhole is such that there is at least 12" of precast wall between the openings provided for sewers. The use of adjusting rings is limited in height to eight (8") inches. Inlet and/or catch basin frames and grates shall be Neenah No. 3015,East Jordan No. 7010,or approved equal. Whenever possible, castings for curb drains shall have a fish logo to discourage dumping of oils, pesticides, 'and other inappropriate items into the storm sewer system. Where a continuous grade is carried across an inlet or catch basin casting, the open-vaned cover shall be used,Neenah No.R-32868V,East Jordan No.EV-7520,or approved equal. All manhole castings shall be Neenah No. R-1030, East Jordan No. 105123, and Type B cover, or approved equal. All type B covers shall have"City of Yorkville" and "Storm" cast into the top, and shall be concealed pickhole type. All sections of the manholes shall be completely sealed and butyl rope, including the casting. Manholes shall no be allowed in the pavement, curb, gutter, or sidewalk All flared end sections 15" or larger shall have grates. S-9 Standard Specifications for lmprovemmts In Estate residential developments, a ditch shall be required on both sides of the street, and shall have a minimum profile slope of one(1%)percent(side slope 4:1 on the street side,and 3:1 on the lot side). For developments ten acres in size or larger,the developer may use computer-based methods to determine stormwater storage volumes. The specific method and parameters used in employing the method shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. For developments less than ten acres in size, the storm water storage system shall be designed utilizing a Modified Rational Method,as described below: 1. Q = (Cm) iA, where a run-off co-efficient or Ca is calculated for the site based upon actual proposed surface coverage. Cm then.equals 1.25 times Ca_ 2. The following run-off co-efficient shall be utilized as minimums: Surface C Grass .50 Asphalt/Concrete .98 Roof 1.00 Detention 1.00 3. The maximum release at the designated 100-year level is 0.15 cfs/acre. The City Engineer shall reduce this allowable release rate where the downstream accepting system is experiencing drainage problems such as the Elizabeth Street swale where all receiving discharges are limited to 0.10 cfs/acre. The outlet structure design shall address the two-year (0.04 cfs/acre) and the 25-year(0.08 cfs/acre) storm control,in addition to the 100-year event 4. When depressional compensatory storage is provided by increasing the volume of a stormwater detention basin, the maximum allowable release rates of the basin shall be reduced, as directed by the City of Yorkville to approximate the pre-development release of the depressional area,and realize the full storage potential of the enlarged basin. 5. The minimum size restrictor shall be a four-inch by twelve-inch long 14D PVC pipe. The design must be designed for easy maintenance and cleaning during a storm event The discharge shall be directly to a downstream storm sewer if one is available within a reasonable distance. If not, the discharge will be to the surface, with approved energy dissipation and downstream erosion protection. 6. The rainfall intensities to be utilized are those established by the Illinois State Water Survey's Bulletin#70, as amended for the specific City of Yorkville area. In designating the required storm water storage volumes,the maximum value calculated using the various events should be utilized- See Figure 3 for a sample calculation. 7. The storm water storage areas must have containment for twelve inches of additional storm water storage, with an approved calculated overflow area at six inches above calculated 100- year elevation. This overflow shall have an erosion concrete curtain wall, with a minimum thickness of 8 inches, a minimum depth of three feet below grade, and a length to extend a minimum of four feet beyond the limits of the overflow on either end. This wall is not to be formed,but is to be trenched or excavated into natural soil, or into the compacted fill, and is to be finished flush to the ground_ 8. Storm water storage areas shall be covered by an easement,including access thereto,such that should the owner not maintain said area as necessary,the City can cause such corrections and bill the owner,including any and all administrative costs. S-10 Standard Specifications for Improvements 4. The engineering plans shall have a full sheet dedicated to the soil erosion and sedimentation control requirements for the development,including silt fencing,straw bales, drainage fabric, etc. Failure to properly maintain this system may result in major storm sewer cleaning within the site and in the offset storm system. The City reserves the right to place a hold on all building permits and inspections if the soil erosion and sedimentation control plan is not properly maintained. Keeping the streets clean is part of this plan, and failure to do so will result in these actions.The developer shall establish a Street Cleaning deposit with the City of Yorkville, in the amount of$5000.00. if the streets are not cleaned within 48 hours of a written request by the Director of Public Works, the City shall have the streets cleaned, and subtract that cost from the deposit The developer shall replenish the deposit to the full amount if it falls to less than $1000.00. The Yorkville City Council shall return any unused portion of the deposit to the developer upon acceptance of the streets. 10. The developer shall establish basins onsite where concrete ready-mix trucks must wash out after delivering their load. Signs shall be posted at each entrance to the development to warn truck drivers of the requirement to wash out at specific sites, and notify them of the fine for non-compliance (up to $100.00 for each offense). Each entrance sign shall include a simplified map of the development; to show the locations of the washout basins in the development A sign shall also be posted at each washout basin, to identify the site. The developer shall maintain all signs,basins, and appurtenances in good condition until the City accepts the public improvements. Washout basins shall be located outside of the public right-of-way,parks,and all public utility easements. They shall be located in relatively low-traffic areas,and be at least fifty-(50')feet from storm drains, open drainage facilities, and watercourses,unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. Basins shall have a minimum twelve (12") inch thick CA-3 aggregate approach of sufficient width over a woven geotextile fabric, to reduce tracking of mud onto roadways. The washout area shall be contained by an earthen berm, and be at least ten (10') wide by ten(10')long. The maximum depth of a washout basin shall be three feet When the volume of a washout basin is 75%full,the developer shall remove the hardened concrete and transport it to a legal landfill. Burying waste concrete onsite-shall not be permitted.. The developer shall incorporate the items necessary to comply with this requirement, as well as provisions for maintenance,onto the erosion and sediment control plan sheet All signage, washout basins,and appurtenances shall be in place before the first building permit is issued. 11. The engineering plans shall have one or more full sheets dedicated to the Final Grading of the entire site. The minimum grade for all grass areas shall be two (2%) percent, except that swale areas may be at one (1 9/6) percent if it is over an approved, piped underdrain. Slopes shall be shown with arrows at all locations from all break points. A grading plan on an 8-1/2" x 11"paper for the actual building must be submitted for each building permit submitted,and will become a part of the building permit All top of foundation elevations will be a minimum of two (2') feet, and a maximum of three (3') feet above the street centerline elevation, measured at the center of the lot in question,unless the City Engineer directs otherwise,based on site-specific conditions. Drives must be at a minimum slope of two (2 0/6) percent, and maximum slope of eight(8%)percent towards the curb flow line from the garage. When the forms for the foundation are ready to pour, a top of foundation elevation and location certification of a registered surveyor or engineer, as approved by the building inspector, is required prior to pouring the concrete into the forms. The tolerance here is 0.15 feet lower and 0.5 feet higher,and behind all applicable setback and easement lines. S-11 Standard Specifications for Improvements 12. Requests for an occupancy permit must include an as-built grading plan, signed and sealed by a registered land surveyor, showing the original, approved grades and slopes, along with the actual grades,just prior to the occupancy permit request The actual grades must fall within a tolerance of 0.15 feet in order to receive an occupancy permit Top soiling and seeding or sodding,if applicable,must be in place prior to the final grading plan. All City-incurred costs of reviewing these grading plans shall be the responsibility of the developer. Note that specific building codes, ordinances, and permitting procedures, which may be established by the United City of Yorkville,shall supersede these requirements. 13. General grading and landscaping of the storm water areas shall be designated according to the Park Development Standards, Landscape Ordinance, and these Standard Specifications. The City may require that storm water detention and retention facilities, as well as grading, landscaping, and stormwater collection systems, incorporate currently acknowledged Best Management Practices to improve storm water quality. These may include, but are not limited to, naturalized detention basins, bio-swales, low impact design standards, perforated storm sewer, designs that reduce the degree of connected impervious areas, designs that encourage infiltration of stormwater,etc. Wet ponds shall have a maximum allowable depth of two feet between the normal water level and the high water level corresponding to the Ten-Year Frequency Storm. The City may require wetland-type plantings and appropriate grading around the perimeter of wet ponds. The developer shall provide a soil report, prepared by a licensed professional engineer, to determine whether or not lake lining will be required. Vertical or nearly vertical edge treatment will require an approved method,allowing a child to easily climb out of the water. Storm sewers discharging to a stormwater basin shall be designed such that the sewer invert at the discharge point is no lower than 6"below the normal water level.of the basin,and the top of sewer is no lower than the ten-year high water level of the basin. 14. Storm water storage basins shall operate independently of any watercourse or water body receiving the discharge from the basins. Bypass flows from upstream areas should bypass the storm water storage facility, where practical.-'The entire development shall be examined under the premise that all storm sewers are blocked and full when a 100-year event occurs, and the development can pass these flows without flooding homes. All overflows are to be contained within the right-of-way, or where absolutely necessary, through special drainage easements. All buildings shall have the lowest water entry a minimum of 1$ inches above the elevations determined for this bypass situation. 15. Storm water detention shall not be required under the conditions listed below. The City reserves the right to require detention on any parcel of land if special circumstances exist, and to require that sewer be constructed as necessary,to carry away the storm water. a) Proposed development or re-development of the existing lots zoned single- family detached,or duplex residential,less than 2.5 acres in gross area. b) Proposed development or re-development of existing lots zoned other than single-family detached or duplex residential, that are less than 1.25 acres in gross area. 5-12 standard Specifications fox Improvements WATER SYSTEM 1. All water mains shall be Class 52 ductile iron pipe, conforming to the latest specification requirements of ANSI A21.S.1. Mains shall be cement lined, in accordance with. ANSI A21.4. Fittings shall conform to ANSI 21.10_ Gate valves shall be resilient wedge type, conforming to the latest revised requirements of AWWA specification C509. All water mains are to be polyethylene wrapped. Main line valves 10" diameter and larger are to be installed in a vault Smaller main-line valves shall either be installed in a vault, or have a Trench Adapter valve box,similar to those used at fire hydrants. No vaults or valve boxes shall be in the pavement or sidewalk. 2. Water services up to 3" diameter shall be iype "K" copper, conforming to the latest revised specification requirement of ASTM B88. Minimum size for residential units shall be one inch in diameter. Corporation stops shall be McDonald No. 4701, Mueller H-15000, or Ford F- 600. Curb stops shall be McDonald No. 6104, Mueller H-15154, or Ford B22-333m, with Minneapolis patter B-boxes,similar to McDonald N.5614 or Mueller H-10300. 3. Minneapolis type B boxes shall be installed in the right-of-way, but not in the sidewalk or driveway. 4. Fire hydrants shall be one of the following: 1. Clow F-2545 (Medallion) 2. Mueller A423 Super Centurion 3. Waterous WB-67-250 Hydrants shall have a 5-114"main valve assembly,one 4-112"pumper nozzle, and two 2-112" hose nozzles, with national standard threads, a national standard operating nut, and above ground break flange. The installation of the hydrant shall conform to AWWA 600 standards. Auxiliary valve boxes shall either be Trench Adapter Model Six by American Flow Control, Clow F-2546 with F-2493 cover, or approved equal. For valve boxes other than those by American Flow Control, the box shall be attached to the hydrant barrel with grip arms, as manufactured by BLR Enterprises,or approved equal 5. Inspections and Installation: All water mains shall be designed and installed in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Water Mains in Illinois. Upon completion, water mains shall be subjected to hydrostatic pressure test of 150-psi average for up to 4 hours. Allowable recovery shall conform to the Standard Specifications for Water& Sewer Main Construction in Illinois. The water operator in charge or person authorized by the water operator in charge shall be present during all testing. The developer shall use the pressure gauge supplied by the City for the test 6. New water main shall be disinfected in accordance with AWWA standard C601. Water will be tested to assure that 50 mg/1 of CL2 is in disinfected water. Sampling shall be taken by water operator in charge or persons authorized by the water in charge. Water must pass two consecutive days of sampling tests by a state approved lab. 7. Water mains shall be minimum eight inches internal diameter, with a cover of five feet, six inches below finished grade. Watermain stubs to hydrants shall be at least six inches internal diameter. City water mains and hydrants shall be placed of the North and West sides of the streets, unless approved otherwise the City Engineer. Valves shall be installed each second consecutive hydrant, at intersecting lines, and other locations as required, such that a minimum number of services will be affected during a main isolation. S-13 Standard Sp=ificabons for lmpmvemmts Fire hydrants shall be installed throughout the subdivision at each intersection and at intervals not exceeding the requirements of two fire hydrants serving any point of any building, or 300 feet along the roadway, whichever is more stringent. Special conditions may dictate a closer spacing, as approved. Fire hydrants shall be located on the property line, except at corners, and shall be set two feet minimum and three feet maximum from the curb back to the face of the pumper nozzle. Where there is no curb and gutter,the face of the pumper nozzle shall be between 19 inches to 20 inches above finished grade line(sidewalk to curb). Base elbow of hydrant shall. be properly thrust blocked, and shall be provided with clean, washed CA7 aggregate and polyethylene covering. All hydrants and any adjustment fittings shall receive one field coat of red paint: as recommended by the manufacturer, prior to final acceptance. 8. All tees,bends, fire hydrants, and valves shall be adequately blocked with pre-cast blocks and poured in place thrust blocking against undisturbed earth. 9. Services shall be equipped with corporation stop,curb stop, and buffalo box. The buffalo box shall be set in the parkway, on the centerline of the property,approximately centered between the back of sidewalk and the adjacent right-of-way line. Service trenches beneath or within two feet of proposed driveways, sidewalks, or other pavements shall be backfilled full-depth with aggregate. Except as permitted below, the underground water service pipe and the building drain,or building sewer,shall be not less than ten feet apart horizontally,and shall be separated by undisturbed or compacted earth. The water service pipe may be placed in the same trench with the building drain and building sewer if the conditions listed below are met: A. Local conditions prevent a lateral separation of ten feet; B. The bottom of the water service pipe at all points shall be at least 18 inches above the top of the sewer line at its highest point All water and sewer services must be inspected an approved by the building inspector prior to backfilling. C. The water service pipe shall be placed on a solid shelly excavated at one side of the common trench, and shall have no joints from the buffalo box to the water meter inside the house; and D. The material and joints of sewer and water service pipe shall be installed in such a manner, and shall posses the necessary strength and durability to prevent the escape of solids, liquids, and gasses there from under all known adverse conditions, such as corrosion, strains due to temperature changes, settlement, vibrations,and superimposed loads. 10. Depth of bury shall be 5'6" below finish grade. No joints will be allowed between the corporation stop and the curb stop. 11. All wtermain shall be looped and double fed, and shall be extended to the far limits of the development, and in size appropriate for future development, as directed by the City Engineer. Recapture and over-sizing may be applicable. 12. The developer shall reimburse the City of Yorkville for the cost of water to fill and test new watermains,and also for the cost of laboratory tests after chlorination. The water cost shall be at the bulls rate charged by the City of Yorkville at that time. The volume of water shall be calculated as the volume of two and one-half times the lengths and diameters of new watermains. 13. Watermain proposed to cross existing city streets shall be constructed by directional boring. Open-cut construction shall not be allowed without consent from the Public Works Director. 14. Connections to existing watermains shall employ line stops to minimize the disruption of service to existing residents. S-14 Standard Specifications for Improvements SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM A complete sanitary sewer system is required for all new development The minimum internal size of sanitary sewer main shall be eight inches in diameter. The top of the sewer main shall be a minimum of three feet lower than the lowest floor elevation at all service connection locations,but not less than eight feet below finished grade, wherever possible. Should the sewers serving a particular development not be deep enough to serve the basement, as noted above, then overhead plumbing will be required However, all levels of the building must be served by gravity, with only the below-grade levels being served by a pump unit The City Engineer may require that certain buildings not have subgrade levels due to special situations. The sanitary sewer shall be extended to the development's far extremes, as directed by the City Engineer, for proper and orderly growth. The city Engineer will also direct the sizing and grades for the sewer,so as to fit the overall plan for the City. The City strongly discourages the use of lift stations, but if the City Engineer approves the use of a public lift station, the following shall be required as a minimum.: A. The pumps shall be submersible,with a back up pump and well-designed wet well. B. The station building shall be a brick structure with conventional-pitched roofing and paved access. The building shall comply with all International Building Code regulations, and shall be heated and ventilated. The subdivider shall follow normal building permit procedures,and pay the normal fees for construction of the lift station building. C. The unit will be equipped*ith a back-up power source,utilizing natural gas as a fuel,and can operate on manual or fully automatic mode,complete with a variable exercise mode. D. The motor control center shall have a solid-state duplex logic. Sewage level in the wet well shall be measured with a pressure transducer. A dial-out alarm system matching that currently in use in the City shall be provided. E. The City Engineer must approve any and all lift stations, and may require other improvements. F. There shall be good-quality noise control, and all electronic components shall be explosion- proof G. Force mains shall be sized to carry the initial, intermediate, and ultimate flow rates from the tributary area, at a velocity of between 3.0 and 6.0 feet per second. Material shall be watermain quality Ductile Iron with polyethylene encasement Gate valves in vaults shall be constructed in the force main at intervals not exceeding 600 feet, to allow quick isolation in the event of a leak Blow-off valves in vaults shall be constructed at high points in the force main, and shall discharge to sanitary sewers, where possible. Force mains shall be tested at 150-psi for two hours,similar to watermain testing. H. The sub-divider shall maintain an inventory of each size and type fuse, relay, and other plug- in type devices used in the lift station motor control center, as recommended by the manufacturer. These items shall be housed in a wall mounted metal cabinet The subdivider shall also supply a heavy-duty free standing metal shelf with not less than square feet of shelf space,and one(1) fire extinguisher rated for Type A,B,and C fires. I. The sub-divider shall provide start-up training to the Public Works Department personnel,and shall provide three sets of Operations and Maintenance Manuals for all equipment at the lift station. 1. Underground conduit shall be heavy-wall PVC. 5-15 Standard Specifications for Improvements K. The exterior of the wet well shall be waterproofed. The City may require the wet well to have a minimum internal diameter of up to eight feet Sewer construction cannot start until the Illinois Environmental Pollution Agency (IEPA) has notified the City Engineer that approvals have been secured. Sanitary sewer pipe shall be PVC plastic pipe,with a minimum SDR 26. All pipe and fittings shall be pressure rated in accordance with ASTM D-2241 and ASTM D-3139 (per AWWA C-900) for sizes 6-15 inches. Solvent joints are not permitted All public sanitary sewers will be air and mandrel tested(7-point minimum) by the developer, at his expense, under the supervision of the City Engineer. One copy of the report shall be forwarded to the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District, and one report shall be forwarded to the City Engineer. All testing will be done in conformance with the "Standard Specifications For Water and Sewer Main Construction in Illinois",current edition. All public sanitary sewers shall be internally televised in color and recorded on videotape and written log by the developer,at his expense;under the supervision of the-City Engineer,to ensure that the sewers are straight,unbroken,tight,and flawless. There must be good-quality lighting for a sharp and clear image of all sewer segments. Poor quality images will result in re-televising the system, at the developer's expense. The videotape must clearly mark the segment being televised through manhole numbering, and the image must clearly identify the footage as it progresses through the pipe. One copy of the complete videotapes and written log shall be forwarded to the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District,and one complete set shall be forwarded to the City Engineer. All manholes will be required to be internally vacuum tested by the developer, at his expense, under the supervision of the Engineer. This test will check the integrity of the complete structure, from the invert to the casting, including all adjusting rings. One copy of the test results shall be forwarded to the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District, and one copy shall be forwarded to the City Engineer. Vacuum testing of each manhole shall be carried out immediately after assembly backfilling,and rough grading, and shall be witnessed and approved by the City Engineer. All lift holes shall be plugged with an approved non-shrinking grout No grout will be placed in the horizontal joints before testing. All pipes entering the manhole shall be plugged, taking care to securely brace the plugs from being drawn into the manhole. The test head shall be placed at the inside of the top of the casting and the seal inflated in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. A vacuum of ten inches of mercury shall be drawn and the vacuum pump shut off. With the valve closed,the time shall be measured for the vacuum to drop to nine inches. The manhole shall pass if the time is greater.than 60 seconds for a 48-inch diameter, manhole, 75 seconds for a 60-inch manhole, and 90 seconds for a 72-inch manhole. All manhole castings shall be Neenah No.R-1030 frame,East Jordan No. 105123,and Type B cover,or approved equal. If the manhole fails the initial test, necessary repairs shall be made with a non-sbzink grout,while the vacuum is still being drawn. Retesting shall proceed until a satisfactory test result is obtained. If the rim of a sanitary manhole needs to be reset or adjusted after successful vacuum testing,but before the expiration oft eh one-year warranty period, it shall be sealed and adjusted properly in the presence of the City Engineer. Failure to do so will require the manhole to be vacuum tested again. All manhole frames shall be Neenah No. R-1030, East Jordan No., 105123, or approved equal, with Type B covers. All Type B covers shall have"City of Yorkville"and"Sanitary"cast into the lid, and shall have concealed pick holes with a machined surface and watertight rubber gasket seals. All manhole segments, including the frame and adjusting rings,shall be set with butyl rope joint sealant Manholes shall be minimum four-foot diameter, and shall not be located in pavement,curb,gutter,or sidewalk 5-16 Standard Speeiticadons for Impevvemmts All sanitary sewer manholes shall be provided with approved cast in place rubber boots (flexible manhole sleeve), having a nominal wall thickness of 3116" with a ribbed concrete configuration and with stainless steel binding straps,properly sized and installed for all conduits. All manholes shall be reinforced precast concrete, and shall be located at intersections and spaced at a maximum interval of 300 feet, except that a closer spacing may be required for special conditions. The maximum allowable amount of adjusting rings shall be eight inches in height using as few rings as possible. All manholes shall be marked at the time of construction with a four-inch:by four-inch hardwood post neatly installed vertically and with a minimum three-feet bury and a minimum four-foot exposed. The top one-foot of the post shall be neatly painted white. Wells and septic systems are allowed in Estate-residential developments that are not within 250 feet of water and/or sewer service. When each lot is within 250 feet of water and/or service,that lot may maintain their septic and/or well only until failure of the septic or well. At that time the lot must,if within 250 feet of the sewer and/or water line hook-up to the sewer and/or water,as the case may be, connect to the City utilities at the lot owner's sole expense. After connection to the City Sanitary Sewer System,individual septic fields shall be abandoned by pumping out the tank, knocking in the cover, and filling with dirt or stone in accordance with Health Department regulations. TRAFFIC STUDY A traffic study may be required,and shall include: 1. Levels of service for existing conditions; 2. Levels of service for post-construction conditions; 3. All calculations shall be conducted according to the"Highway Capacity Manual"; 4. Recommendations as to additionalllimited access,additional lanes,signalization,etc. If the City of Yorkville requires a traffic study for a development,that study will be contracted for by the City, and paid for by the developer. The developer shall establish a Traffic Study deposit with the City of Yorkville, in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer. The City shall return any unused portion of the deposit to the developer upon approval of a Final Plat or Site Plan. If the land use plan of the development changes during the approval process,the developer may be required to make additional deposits to fund re-analysis and revisions to the Traffic Study. The need or requirement for a traffic impact study shall be determined during the concept or preliminary planning stage of the proposed development The developer/subdivider shall meet with City of Yorkville officials during one of these stages for the purpose of determining the traffic study requirements. Wlien the City of Yorkville requires that a traffic study be prepared based upon the above, the study shall include, but not be limited to, addressing the following issues: INTRODUCTION: A general description of the proposed development, including it's size, location,the political jurisdiction in which the site is located,the boundary limits of the study area, and any other information needed to aide in the review of the development's traffic impacts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A description of the existing and proposed land uses of the development If alternative land uses are being proposed,the highest trip generation uses shall be assigned for each land use. SITE ACCESSMILITY: A clear and concise description of the proposed ingress/egress points to the proposed development,including a sight distance analysis. 5-17 standard Specifications for Improvements EXISTING EXTERNAL ROADWAY NETWORK: A description of the existing external roadway networking the vicinity of the proposed development,to include functional classification, primary traffic control devices, signalized intersections, roadway configurations, geometric features (curves and grades), lane usage, parking regulations, street lighting, driveways servicing sites across from or adjacent to the site, and right-of-way data The area of influence shall be determined by the traffic generated from the site, the trip distribution of traffic, and the trip assignment of the traffic generated by the development over the surrounding area road network. EXISTING AM PM & TOTAL DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES: Existing AM, PM, and total daily traffic volumes for access driveways (if existing),intersections, and the roadway network in the site vicinity shall be determined and displayed on a graphic(s)in the final report To determine AM and PM existing traffic volumes, machine counts and/or manual counts shall be conducted during a three-hour period of the morning, between approximately 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM of an average or typical weekday, and also between approximately 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM, on an average or typical weekday. Peak hour counts may be required on Saturday and/or Sunday, depending on the proposed land use. All AM and PM peak hour counts shall be recorded and summarized in fifteen-minute increments, and be included in the Appendix of the final report Manual counts shall include vehicle classifications, i.e. passenger cars, single-unit, multi-unit trucks and buses. Traffic counts shall show both entering and exiting traffic at the proposed access points (if existing),in addition to turning and through traffic movements at critical intersections_ TRIP GENERATION RATES AND VOLUMES: Trip generation rates and volumes for eaLh type of proposed land use shall be determined for the AM and PM peak hours, and total daily volumes may be required on Saturday and/or Sunday, depending on the proposed land use. The trip generation rates shall be calculated from the latest data available contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's "Trip Generation Manual". If trip generation rates for a specific land use are not available from the "Trip Generation Manual", the United City of Yorkville shall approve the substitute rates. SITE-GENERATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT: The most logically traveled routes in the vicinity of the development shall be used for trip distribution and assignment purposes. The directional distribution of site-generated traffic approaching and departing the development should be shown in both graphic and tabular form. All assumptions used in the determination of distribution and assignment shall be clearly stated. EXISTING PLUS SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES: Existing, plus site-generated traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours, and total daily traffic for access drives, intersections, and the roadway network in the site vicinity shall be determined and displayed on a graphics) in the final report. Traffic volumes shall show both entering and exiting traffic at the proposed access points, in addition to turning and through traffic movements at critical intersections. FUTURE TRAFFIC MKSTING PLUS SITE-GENERATED VOLUMES: Future traffic (existing,plus site-generated traffic volumes) for the AM and PM peak hours, and the total daily traffic for access drives,intersections,and roadway network in the site vicinity shall be determined and displayed on a graphic(s) in the final report. Projected increases in the external (non site' related)roadway traffic must also be determined. The selection of a horizon year for which traffic operation conditions are to be characterized may be considered as the date full build-out and occupancy is achieved. If the project is a large multi-phased development in which several stages of development activity are planned, a number of horizon years may be required, that correspond to the bringing on line of major development phases. Horizon dates should be times to coincide with major stages of the overall project, or to coincide with increments of area transportation system improvements. S-18 Standard Specifications for Impmvements INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Proposed access driveways and influenced intersections shall be subject to an existing, plus projected, capacity analysis. Projected traffic conditions shall include the effects of any committed developments within the influenced area The existing and projected levels of service derived from the analysis shall be used to aid in the evaluation of design and operation alternatives of the access driveways and influenced intersections. The capacity analysis shall be in accordance with the techniques descnW in the most recent edition of the Transportation Research Board's "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209. SIGNALIZATION WARRANTS: If it is anticipated that the development's driveway(s) or existing external non-signalized intersections will satisfy signalization warrants,a warrant analysis shall be conducted,using the projected volumes determined from the trip generation. The results of such an analysis shall be tabulated in the traffic impact study. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMIyIENDATIONS: Clear and concise descriptions of the findings shall be presented in the final report_ These findings shall include all recommended improvements for access facilities, internal roadways and intersections, and external roadway and intersection improvements. 5-19 Si-mdard Specifications for improvements DRIVEWAY AND PARKING LOT PAVING ALL DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING LOTS SHALL BE PAVED AS PER THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: 1. ASPHALT: A. RESIDENTIAL Two-inch I-11 bituminous concrete surface, over eight-inches (minimum) of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed graveL B. COMNIERCLALgNDUSTRIAL Three-inch I-11 bituminous concrete surface, over ten-inches (minimum) of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed gravel. 2. CONCRETE: A- RESIDENTIAL Six-inch Class X, over six-inches (minimum) of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed gravel. B. COMAKERCIALANDUSTRLAL Eight-inch Class X, over eight-inches of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed gravel. 3. PAVING BRICK: A. RESIDENTIAL Paving brick over one inch of sand and eight inches of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed gravel. 4. SEALCOAT: A. CONITERCIALJINDUSTRIA.L An A3 seal coat, as defined by the IDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, may be allowed on areas behind the building, when used as a temporary surface, not to exceed three years, after which it must be paved to the above specifications. The same base should be ten inches (minimum) of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed gravel. S-20 Standard Specifications for Improvements This Resolution shall be in full force and effect form and after its due passage, approval,and publication,as provided by law. Passed and approved by the Mayor of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois, This day ,200` . ayor Passed and approved by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, This Q- day f ,200` . ATTEST City Clerk SEAL RICHARD STICKA WANDA OHARE VALERIE BURD LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS PAUL JAMES JOE BESCO ROSE SPEARS S-21 r 0 O V � +s= w � � w •� � O C> 0 0 0 O O O O O ,� N U) LD Ln LO v N N N LO G o to E 0 a� E O o O O o O O 0 r„ .E L17 l(7 lt7 lf) 0 lf7 Lf7 O O O O O O O O > V U *� O � U E o o o e o e H X m n LO U') u7 m Lo .� � O 4° c' 3 m o °o °o o 0 0 °O o CO (D rn N N N N r r r N y 4� F— > 0 3 ;. p (D .a N m r N m m E o O U X X X X X X X X Lr)N fi r m to cm m co c° tiq cn w VI G D o cd 16 E 0 00 0 0 O O O O O O LCD O O O Y-i 2 � 4 GO 0 0 0 r r r l[] �ye O , q� -E ? + ' b ' C:) ai 71 71 o C O ?3 I.n M cce) cQ cn O [r3 O U _ O f7 0 0 O O N •E j � o O I� CO CD fD G j v .21 O bo 7 N x 42 "C7 r 7 N 0 U x E 'c .� O c6 0 o as aD m E v, O c cu w yr u) m u7 0 m X v a K L: o � o w ? -d b o ,� L w v is o _ o v� p p � g S c O U p � IE iF r~ �d c L) U ..0.1 �' U Resolution No. 2009- H0 RESOLUTION MODIFYING A POLICY REGARDING PROCEDURE AND AUTHORITY TO REDUCE LETTERS OF CREDIT AND PERFORMANCE BONDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF LAND IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville requires that land developers provide security for the successful completion of the installation of public and quasi-public (together also known as Iand improvements), including but not limited to streets, curbs, sidewalks, watermains, storm and sanitary sewers, streetlights, detention basins, landscaping, etc.; and, WHEREAS, security to ensure completion of land improvements must be provided either in the form of a Performance Bond or Letter of Credit; and, WHEREAS, from time to time, a land developer will seek reduction in the principal amount of the Letter of Credit or the Performance Bond amount after substantial completion of a portion of the land improvements which are the responsibility of the developer; and, WHEREAS, in order to ensure completion of all improvements to be constructed by the land developer in accordance with applicable code requirements, it is in the best interest of the City to adhere to the security requirements as now in full force and effect and permit the reduction of such security under certain circumstances, all as hereinafter set forth. BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois: Section I. The approval process for reduction of the amount of a Letter of Credit and/or Performance Bond shall be as follows: a. The City Engineer shall issue a written recommendation including the basis for approving, denying, or modifying a request for reduction. Said written recommendation shall include the amount of the reduction based upon the Engineer's estimate of probable cost as adjusted by an inflation factor from the initial date of issuance of the Letter of Credit or Performance Bond to the date of reduction. In order to calculate the inflation factor, the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index shall be used. The City Engineer shall also report the remaining amount of the Letter of Credit and/or Performance Bond after reduction. b. The City Engineer's written recommendation shall be forwarded to the City Administrator for approval. c. Upon the City Administrator's concurrence with the City Engineer's recommendation, the reduction shall be deemed approved or denied and the City Engineer is authorized to issue a letter to implement the decision. d. In the event the City Administrator does not concur with the City Engineer's recommendation, the Mayor shall have final authority to approve or deny the City Engineer's recommendation. e. A developer may appeal the decision of the City Administrator to the Mayor, who shall review and make a final determination to affirm or reverse the City Administrator's initial decision. £ The City Administrator or designee shall issue reports, quarterly or more frequently as deemed appropriate, to the Mayor and City Council that summarize Letter of Credit and/or Performance Bond reduction requests that have been received and actions taken pursuant to those requests. Section 11. Final acceptance/approval of land improvements and corresponding reduction/release of Letters of Credit and/or Performance Bonds for developments whose initial Letter of Credit or Performance Bond amounts is less than $1,000,000 shall also be handled in accordance with the procedures established by this policy. Final acceptance/approval of land improvements and corresponding reduction/release of Letters of Credit and/or Performance Bonds for developments whose initial Letter of Credit or Performance Bond amounts are $1,000,000 or more shall be placed before the City Council for approval. Section III. The retainage used in calculations for Letters of Credit and/or Performance Bond reductions is twenty percent(20%). Section IV. Resolution 2004-15 adopted February 24,2009, is hereby repealed. Section V. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2009. ROBYN SUTCLIFF GEORGE GILSON, JR. ARDEN JOE PLOCHER DIANE TEELING GARY GOLINSKI MARTY MUNNS \ ! ROSE SPEARS WALLY WERDERICH `emu APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this c?$ day of SEP fM 6f A.D. 2009. ayor Attest: 22.08 CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS and GUARANTEES, CONSTRUCTION and MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS, ACCEPTANCE of PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS and MAINTENANCE PERIOD A. Construction and Maintenance Requirements: The site grading and erosion con- trol, water distribution system, sanitary sewer system, stormwater management system, street system, street lights, sidewalks, bicycle paths, driveway approaches, landscaping, tree planting, and natural area restoration for every subdivision/planned development shall be constructed in strict accordance with the approved engineering plans and specifications therefore, and the standards set forth in Sections 22.05, 22.06 and 22.07 herein. The public improvements shall be maintained by the subdivider/developer for a minimum of 18 months after the Village Engineer has certified completion of the public improvements in compliance with the maintenance requirements set forth herein. Security (pursuant to Section 22.08-Clb herein) shall be posted with the Village to guarantee the completion of, payment and repairs of the public improve- ments. B. Construction Standards: The public improvements for all subdivisions and planned developments shall be constructed in a good and workmanlike manner in strict accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 22.05, 22.06 and 22.07 herein and the approved final engineering plans and specifications therefore. C. Guarantee of Completion, Payment and Construction: The Village Board will not cause the final plat/plan of any subdivision/planned development to be signed and recorded until the subdivider/developer and the owner have (1) satisfied all the terms and conditions of the ordinance approving of the Preliminary Plat; (2) has executed and delivered to the Village Clerk a Public Improvement Completion Agreement; (3) has tendered cash or filed with the Village Clerk a performance bond/labor and material payment bond or letter of credit to guarantee that all required public improvements will be completed pursuant to this Chapter 22 and the engineering plans and specifications approved by the Village Engineer within a reasonable time and subject to the approval of the Village Board and to further guarantee that the public improvements will be fully paid for and properly maintained pursuant to this Chapter 22; and (4) has complied with all of the provisions of this Chapter 22. 1. Guarantee Public Improvements: To guarantee that the public improve- ments will be completed within the time limits, fully paid for and properly maintained,the subdivider/developer shall file with the Village Clerk: a. A Public Improvements Completion Agreement(Appendix G), b. One of the following forms of guarantee of performance and pay- ment ("construction security") in an amount equal to 120 percent of the estimated construction cost of the public improvements, which have been approved by the Village Engineer, shall be filed with the Village Clerk. I. Cash deposit. II. A performance bond-labor and material payment bond co- signed by a surety licensed to do business in Illinois and having a policy rating of at least A- and a financial rating of Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 1 312110 at least VIII in the latest edition of the A. M. Best's Insur- ance Guide (Appendix F). I11. An irrevocable letter of credit issued by a federally insured financial institution with assets of at least $50,000,000, and a capital asset ratio of at least 6 percent(Appendix F). The Village Attorney must approve the construction security. It shall be the developer/subdivider's obligation to have the financial institution issuing the letter of credit to furnish a current financial statement to the Village. C. Cost estimates shall be prepared by the subdivider's engineer and submitted to the Village Engineer for approval not less than 30 days prior to a request for execution of a plat by the Village. The Village Engineer shall estimate and certify to the Village Board the amount of security, which shall be a minimum of 120 percent of the reasonably estimated cost of the public improvements plus such additional amount as may be required. The Village Board shall approve the required security. d. If the scheduled completion date for any of the public improve- ments is more than one year after the date on which any cash de- posit is made or bond or letter of credit is issued, the amount of such cash deposit, bond, letter of credit or escrow deposit shall be increased by 1.25 percent for each month or fraction thereof by which such scheduled completion date exceeds one year to allow for estimated construction cost increases and repairs to partially completed improvements. For example, if parkway and open space restoration is not scheduled for completion until 30 months after the security deposit is made, the security shall be equal to 137.5 percent of the estimated construction cost of parkway and open space restoration and 120 percent of the estimated construction cost of the other public improvements, assuming the other public improvements are reasonably estimated to be completed within one year. e. After final plat approval a construction inspection escrow account shall be established with the Village. The escrow sum shall be three percent of the Village Engineer's estimated cost of the subdi- vision improvements. This deposit shall be made prior to the exe- cution and recording of the final plat of subdivision. 2. Record of Account: The Treasurer shall maintain a complete record of each cash deposit, bond or letter of credit established to guarantee comple- tion of public improvements, the name of the subdivision, the estimated cost of the public improvements, the scheduled completion dates and the date on which any bond or letter of credit expires. The Treasurer shall re- port quarterly to the Manager on the status of each such cash deposit, completion bond and letter of credit. Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 2 312110 3. Time Limits: The time limits may be extended up to one year by the Man- ager upon the recommendation of the Village Engineer and the Public Works Director, for good cause shown, provided the construction security is extended to cover the new completion date and adjusted for estimated increased costs. The time limits may be extended beyond one year by the Village Board, in its sole discretion, provided the construction security is extended to cover the new completion date and adjusted for increased costs. 4. Expiration of Letter of Credit: Upon receipt of the notice of expiration of any letter of credit to the Treasurer, the Village Engineer shall issue a writ- ten status report to the Treasurer indicating which, if any, of the public improvements are not complete, and either recommend the construction security be (a) extended, and if extended, whether the amount of the con- struction security must be increased to cover the incomplete work, or (b) collected such (1) that the cash deposit be forfeited, (2) the letter of credit be drawn upon, or(3) claim to be made on the bond to cover the estimated cost of the incomplete work plus a sum equal to 15 percent of the engi- neer's original estimate of cost to satisfy the subdivider/developer's main- tenance security obligation. In the event the subdivider/developer fails to renew and/or extend the letter of credit as requested, the Treasurer shall draw the entire amount available under such letter of credit or make a claim on the performance bond/labor and material payment bond before the time limits for filing suit on said bond. The Treasurer shall maintain the proceeds of any forfeited cash deposit drawn on a letter of credit or monies paid by a surety bond company in a separate fund to be used solely for payment of the cost of completion of the public improvements for that subdivision/planned development, including engineering fees and any le- gal expenses incurred in the forfeiture of the letter of credit or bond. 5. Cost Estimate: If an engineer's estimate of cost is more than six months old at the time the plat is recorded, a revised estimate of cost shall be pro- vided, reviewed and approved by the Village Engineer at the subdi- vider/developer's expense. 6. Reduction Requests: The subdivider/developer may request reductions in the balance of the construction security upon completion of each eligible category of public improvement. The reduction will be 90 percent of the original estimated amount for each eligible category. The remaining 10 percent shall be retained to cover punch list work. Also an additional 15 percent of the approved estimate of the cost of construction of the public improvements shall be retained until the public improvements have been accepted and the maintenance guarantee posted with the Village. Specific security reductions information is available from the Village Engineer. D. Permits Required: None of the work specified in this Section 22.08-D shall be performed on any portion of the subdivision/planned development until the Village has issued the following special permits: 1. Early Grading Permit: An early earthwork permit may be issued by the Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 3 312110 Public Works Director only after all of the items listed in the Site Devel- opment Permit Checklist and Early Grading Permit Checklist of Appendix E have been completed, the subdivider/developer has executed a Hold Harmless Agreement for Early Grading (see Appendix E), and has posted cash or a letter of credit in an amount sufficient to perform said earth work and to completely restore the property to its original condition if the pro- ject is not subsequently approved by the Village. 2. Site Development Permit: A site development permit may be issued by the Village only after all of the items listed in the Site Development Permit Checklist (see Appendix E) have been completed and the Village Board has passed an ordinance approving the final subdivision plat/planned de- velopment plan. 3. Demolition Permits: Prior to the demolition of any existing structure on the proposed subdivision/planned development, the subdivider/developer shall apply for and be issued a demolition permit pursuant to Chapter 23, Building Codes, of this Code. Demolition permits shall also be required for abandoning private wells and septic systems. A county Department of Public Health permit shall accompany the demolition permit application. 4. Tree Removal Permit; The removal of trees is governed by Section 5.15 of this Code. 5. Other Permits: Any other applicable permit issued by the EPA, Army Corps of Engineers, state, county, etc., shall be required before initiating any early earthwork, site development, demolition or tree removal. E. Inspection of Public Improvements Required: Public improvements shall be sub- ject to inspection by the Public Works Director both during the course of construction and after construction is completed. The Village Engineer shall have authority over construction, materials, methods of construction and workmanship to insure compliance with this Chapter 22 and the approved plans. The subdivider/developer shall provide for reasonable tests and proof of quality of materials as reasonably requested by the Village Engineer. The Village Engineer may require that work be suspended for due cause, which shall include adverse weather conditions, questionable materials or methods of construction or workmanship, or failure to adhere to this Chapter 22 or the approved plans. 1. Notification: It shall be the responsibility of the subdivider/developer or its general contractor to notify the Public Works Director when work will be- gin and to request inspections. The initial notification that a particular im- provement will begin shall be in writing and every request for an inspec- tion must be received by the Public Works Director at least 72 hours in advance of the requested inspection. 2. Subdivider/Developer Responsible: Failure of any Village employee, in- spector, agent or official to detect construction work or materials which fail to meet the requirements of this Chapter 22 and/or the approved plans, shall in no way relieve the subdivider/developer of full responsibility for adherence by it and all contractors and material suppliers to this Chapter Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 4 312110 22 and the approved plans nor for failure to adhere to high standards of materials, methods and workmanship. 3, Inspection and A roval: When all the public improvements, including the public improvements of separate phase or unit, are completed in their en- tirety, the developer/subdivider shall formally request the Village Engi- neer in writing to certify completion of the public improvements. Upon re- ceipt of the request letter the Village Engineer, in conjunction with the Public Works Director,will schedule a final inspection to take place when reasonably possible. The 18-month maintenance period begins after the first final inspection. Another final inspection is conducted at the end of the 18-month maintenance, which allows the developer to turn all im- provements over to the Village. Due to the inability to determine whether parkway trees are living during winter months, and the inability to conduct certain other inspections due to snow and ice cover, the Village Engineer will not certify completion or recommend acceptance by the Village Board between November 1 and May 1. All deficient public improvements which do not totally conform to this Chapter 22 and the approved plans will be put on a written punch list. The punch list will be forwarded to the developer/subdivider for processing. When the developer/subdivider has corrected the deficiencies on the punch list, a second final inspection of the Village Engineer shall be requested. Scheduling a second inspection is the same as the final inspection. If the length of time between the initial final inspection and the second final inspection is greater than four months, or if the noted deficiencies have not been corrected for the second final inspection, the request for certification of acceptance may be can- celed by the Village Engineer. If canceled, a second request letter will be required, and the certification will be subject to the following additional requirements: a. The developer/subdivider shall be required to pay all costs incurred by the persons conducting the inspection, including, but not limited to, Village staff. b. The punch list recorded during the initial final inspection will be voided and a complete re-inspection may be required. Neither acceptance nor certification of completion by the Village Engineer or acceptance by any employee, inspector, agent or official of the Village, nor maintenance of the public improvements by the Village shall be deemed accepted by the Village. No public improvements shall be ac- cepted or deemed to be accepted until the Village Board passes an ord - nance accepting such public improvements on the written recommendation of the Village Engineer and upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Section 22.08-H herein. Certification and Village Board acceptance shall not occur until after the final inspection at the end of the 18-month main- tenance period. 4. Required Barricades: Once house or commercial structure construction ac- tivities have started, the subdivider/developer shall have on the project site Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 5 312110 at all times a minimum of 12 type 2 barricades with lights, which can be erected as needed during repair activities to curb, pavement, sidewalk or other public improvement, to protect the public. An additional 12 barri- cades must be available at all times. F. Protection and Repair of Existing Public Improvements: The subdivider/developer and its contractors, subcontractors and material suppliers shall be jointly and severally responsi- ble for protecting the existing public improvements in the subdivision/planned development against damage resulting from their construction activities in the subdivision/planned develop- ment and assuring the Village that such existing public improvements and Village property are not damaged or rendered less useful or unsightly as a result of the construction activities. This provision includes any and all damages to, and any nuisance created upon, all lands, improve- ments and landscaping of the Village or other governmental entities and public agencies; damage to existing streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, driveway approaches and parkways, by the passage of equipment or trucks, or by excavation for any purpose; the spilling or tracking of earth, sand or rock onto existing streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters or parkways; erosion by stormwater of earth, gravel, sand or other debris onto streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, drainage swales, manholes, valve vaults, inlets or catch basins; or the damage of water mains, sanitary sewer, b-boxes, hydrants, culverts or storm sewers. To reduce or localize the possibility of damage to streets by heavy trucks,the subdivider/developer and its contractors, subcontractors and material suppliers shall follow access instructions of the Public Works Director. The subdivider/developer shall be absolutely responsible for the enforcement of the access instruc- tions upon its contractors, subcontractors and their suppliers. Where deemed advisable, the Village Board, upon the recommendation of the Public Works Director, shall require, either prior to construction or after construction is in progress, that the subdivider/developer post additional security in the form of a cash bond, performance bond/labor and material payment bond or a letter of credit to guarantee the repair of any damages or abatement of any nuisance, caused, suffered or permitted by the subdivider/developer, its contractors or material suppliers. Until such security has been posted, construction shall be discontinued. The Village may draw upon such cash bond, performance bond/labor and material payment bond or letter of credit to pay for any expenses that have been or may be incurred by the Village for cleaning its streets, catch basins and sewers, regrading of landscaping drainage swales, and repairing any damages to its public improvements. G. Conclusion of the Public Improvement Construction: The completion date of the public improvements shall be the first day of the next month following completion of the public improvements and all punch list work certified by the Village Engineer based on the Village Engineer's determination that all of the conditions set forth in Section 22.08-H herein have been satisfied. H. Acceptance Procedure for Public Improvements: Public improvements shall be accepted only by the passage of an ordinance by the Village Board upon the recommendation of the Village Engineer. Such recommendation shall be contingent on satisfying the following conditions: I. Work in Accordance with Plans: All the public improvements shall be completed in a good and workmanlike manner using materials of good quality and shall be maintained in good repair by the subdivider/developer in accordance with the standards and requirements of this Chapter 22 as of a date certain, and no component part of the public improvements shall be Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 6 312110 accepted until all of the component parts of the public improvements throughout the subdivision/planned development have been completed in accordance with the approved plans and this Chapter 22 and maintained by the subdivider/developer. 2. Waivers: The developer/subdivider has provided to the Village Engineer sworn statements from each prime contractor with whom it contracted for the construction, installation, repair and maintenance, and a final waiver of lien from every person and entity that furnished labor and/or material in connection with the public improvements, including final waivers from all subcontractors and material suppliers shown on first tier subcontractor's waivers to protect the Village from mechanic's lien claims through the completion date. 3. Test Reports: Where required by this Chapter 22, or reasonably deemed necessary by the Village Engineer, test reports showing compliance with this Chapter 22 and the approved plans must be provided to the Village Engineer. 4. Village Attorney Approval: The Village Attorney shall provide a written report to the Village Board that the developer/subdivider or owner, as the case may be, has or have made all necessary conveyances and approved the form of the maintenance guarantee posted by the developer/subdivider. 5. Village Clerk Approval: Written acknowledgment from the Village Clerk of receipt of the original maintenance guarantee approved by the Village Attorney. 6, Warranty Title: Delivery of a warranty title, approved by the Village At- torney transferring title to the public improvements to the Village, deliv- ered to the Village Clerk. 7. Benchmarks: At least two benchmarks must be set in each subdivision. One benchmark for up to 80 acres and one for each additional 40 acres or part thereof. Benchmark settings shall be coordinated with the Public Works Department at the developer/subdivider's cost. For additional stan- dards refer to the Appendix H, Standard Specifications for Construction and Estimating. 8. Submittal of Final Plans: One reproducible mylar set and two sets of prints of the record drawings shall be submitted to the Village Engineer. The re- cord drawings shall include service location information for sanitary sewer and potable water for each lot and reflect all field changes for location and elevation of public improvements. 9. Inspection of Improvements: All sanitary sewers must be clean; must have passed the required tests. A videotape of the sewer interior shall be sub- mitted to the Village. All sanitary sewer and valve vaults manholes must be water tight and clean. All fire hydrants must be at grade and all oper- able hydrant auxiliary vales must be keyable. All catch basins, inlets and Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 7 312110 storm sewer lines must be free of dirt and debris. No manholes, valve vault frames and drainage structure frames located within roadways may protrude above the roadway surface, but must be even with, or no more than one-half inch below the roadway surface. A full stand of grass shall have been established on all parkways and drainage swales. In the opinion of the Village Arborist all dead, dying or diseased parkway trees shall have been replaced. All domestic "buffalo" boxes shall have been adjusted to proper grade, located and keyed by Public Works personnel. All struc- turally cracked or sinking sidewalks, driveways, aprons or curbs shall have been replaced. Variations in roadway surfaces shall not be greater than one-quarter inch in 10 feet as checked using a 20-foot long straight-edge in each wheel lane. All roadway surface and base course thickness must be within substantial compliance with the approved plans and specifications. The Village shall have received a set of record drawings showing the loca- tions of all water and sanitary sewer service connections and the minimum light levels specified in the lighting standards of this Chapter 22. All fail- ures must have been repaired and all defects corrected. The public im- provements must have been constructed in substantial compliance with the approved plans. At the time of the walk through, the subdivider/developer shall submit "as builts" of the entire project, including the location of drain tiles. The "as-builts" shall be submitted as prints and electronically in AutoCAD. I. Guarantee for Maintenance of Public Improvements: The subdivider/developer shall post adequate security to guarantee the maintenance of the public improvements and every component part of the public improvements in an acceptable condition for the maintenance period as defined in Section 22.08 44 herein and to guarantee payment for all maintenance work. To guarantee that the public improvements will be maintained during the maintenance period and to guarantee payments for all labor and/or material during the maintenance period, the subdivider/developer shall file with the Village Clerk one of the following forms of guarantee of maintenance in an amount equal to 15 percent of the engineer's estimate of the construction cost of the public improvements as approved by the Village Engineer. 1. Cash deposit. 1 A maintenance bond co-signed by a surety having a surety rating of at least an A- and a financial rating of at least a VIII in the latest edition of A. M. Best's Insurance Guide (Appendix E). 3. An irrevocable letter of credit issued by a federally insured financial insti- tution with assets of at least $50,000,000 and a capital asset ratio of at least 6 percent(Appendix E). J. Responsibility for Maintenance: The subdivider/developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of all the public improvements for its subdivision/planned development for the maintenance period, and for the payment of all costs associated therewith. 1. Maintenance Obligations: The subdivider/developer's maintenance re- sponsibilities obligations shall include, but are not limited to: (a) maintain- ing the public improvements, (b) repairing any damage to the public im- Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 8 312110 provements caused by the subdivider/developer, its agents, servants, em- ployees or its successors and assigns, or by any contractor hired by the subdivider/developer, its agents, servants, employees, successors or as- signs, or any subcontractor hired by such contractor, (c) repairing or re- placing any defective workmanship or material in the public improve- ments, (d) protecting the Village against the results of any defective workmanship or materials appearing to have been incorporated in any part of the public improvements which shall have appeared or been discovered within the maintenance period, and (e) paying for the cost of all such maintenance work. In the event that any such pubic improvements are damaged, the burden shall be on the subdivider/ developer to show that such damage was not caused by the subdivider/developer, its agents, ser- vants, employees, successors or assigns, or by any contractor hired by the subdivider/developer, its agents, servants, employees, successors or as- signs, or any subcontractor hired by such contractor. 2. Village Services: During the maintenance period, the Village will provide its customary street sweeping and snow plowing services, and enforce Section 41.01, Traffic Regulations, of this Code, on the public streets of a subdivision/planned development, but any and all other maintenance of the public improvements shall be performed by the subdivider/developer. An Agreement for Snow and/or Ice Removal on Unaccepted Streets (Ap- pendix I) shall be entered into by the subdivider/developer prior to winter. 3. Term of Maintenance Period: The maintenance period shall commence on the completion date certified by the Village Engineer and continue for a minimum of 18 months. The Village Engineer shall establish the length of the maintenance period so the expiration date occurs between May 1 and November 1. Notwithstanding the length of the maintenance period, the maintenance guarantee shall be 18 months. Approximately 90 days before the expira- tion of the maintenance period,the Village Engineer and Public Works Di- rector shall conduct a maintenance inspection. In the event the inspection reveals any deficiencies in the public improvements, the deficiencies will be inventoried and placed on a maintenance punch list, which will be mailed, via certified mail, return receipt requested, to the devel- oper/subdivider. The Village Engineer shall also prepare an estimate of the approximate cost to correct the deficiencies and forward the estimate to the Treasurer. The developer/subdivider shall have 45 days from the date the maintenance punch list is mailed to correct and remedy all deficien- cies. Prior to the expiration of the maintenance period, the Village Engi- neer and Public Works Director shall conduct a final inspection to deter- mine compliance. In the event any uncorrected deficiencies remain or any new deficiencies are discovered, the Village Engineer shall provide a writ- ten estimate of the cost to correct any remaining and new deficiencies to the Treasurer. Within 30 days of the end of the maintenance period, the devel- oper/subdivider shall furnish to the Village Engineer a general contractor's Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 9 312110 sworn statement from each prime contractor who performed by of the maintenance work and final waivers of lien from all persons and entities that furnished labor and/or materials in connection with the maintenance work. In the event there are uncorrected deficiencies during the maintenance period and/or missing waivers of lien, the Treasurer shall either (a) deduct from the cash deposit an amount sufficient to correct said deficiencies, in- cluding all estimated engineering, legal and other expenses to cover the cost of preparing specifications, bid documents (if applicable) and con- tract(s) to perform such corrective work, and to cover any potential lien claims based on missing waivers of lien, (b) deliver a notice to the surety demanding performance of its obligations under the maintenance bond, (c) deliver a site draft to the issuer of the maintenance letter of credit in an amount sufficient to correct the deficiencies, including estimated engineer, legal and other expenses to cover the cost of preparing specifications, bid documents (if applicable) and contract(s) to perform any corrective work, and to cover any potential lien claims based on missing waivers of lien. This shall be completed before the expiration of the 18-month mainte- nance guarantee. K. Installation of Improvements: A schedule of installation dates and/or time periods in which required improvements will be installed, including the time period between temporary and final improvements (e.g., base/binder/aggregate course and final surface course for streets) in compliance with Appendix G herein, shall be submitted to the Village Engineer and Public Works Director for approval at the time the letter of credit is established with the Village. In the event a required improvement does not meet the approved schedule or completed improvements are deemed to be failing by the Public Works Director, the Village may draw upon the cash deposit, bond or letter of credit to complete those improvements. When a schedule of installation dates has not been submitted and improvements are not completed, or those completed are deemed by the Public Works Director to be failing, the Village may draw upon the cash deposit, bond or letter of credit to complete those improve- ments. Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 10 312110 Reviewed By: �� �•s► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ ADM—NB #1 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ j� ���� Police F-1 Public 2012-35 LE Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Procedural ordinance Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Proposal to adopt a strong committee system during non-summer months. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Alderwoman Spears Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid 1s36 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: June 7, 2012 C<wrMY Sad Subject: Procedural Ordinance ALE Summary An ordinance implementing a strong committee system. Background This item was requested by Alderwoman Spears. The procedural ordinance was last amended by the City Council in April. At that meeting, the City Council implemented the summer schedule with committee of the whole meetings. Proposal Alderwoman Spears would like to amend the procedural ordinance to form a strong committee system. In this type of system, an item does not move from committee to City Council but for approval of the committee. While the Mayor retains the authority to place any items on the City Council agenda, the power of a majority of the City Council to place items on the agenda is restricted. The attached proposal removes the authority of 4 aldermen to place anything on the City Council agenda and directs that all items (except for Mayoral items) to be placed on the agenda with only the approval of a committee. Recommendation How the City Council conducts its business and its meetings is one of the purest policy decisions in local government. Staff offers no recommendation, other than pointing out that state law permits any three aldermen to call a special City Council meeting to discuss anything of their choosing at anytime. This has typically been construed to mean that any three aldermen could put anything on a regular City Council agenda at anytime. Ordinance No. 2012- AN ORDINANCE REGARDING CITY COUNCIL PROCEDURES WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non-home-rule municipality created in accordance with Article VII, Section 7 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970; and, WHEREAS,the City Council of the United City of Yorkville first passed a Procedural Ordinance on November 8, 2011 as Ordinance 2011-65, and revised said ordinance on April 24, 2012 as Ordinance 2012-09; ands, WHEREAS,the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, in accordance with the Illinois Compiled State Statutes, has the right to determine procedures for organizing and conducting all meetings of the City Council acknowledging that the City is bound by certain state and federal laws as well as legal precedents which cannot be supplanted by City ordinance; and, WHEREAS, in keeping with this right, the City Council has adopted Roberts Rules of Order to outline the procedure to be followed during meetings and to regulate the actions of Council members and the public in attendance at such meetings; and, WHEREAS,the City Council has discussed implementing additional procedures to supplement Roberts Rules of Order regarding City Council meetings and the four standing committees of the City Council—Administration, Economic Development, Public Safety and Public Works. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Procedures for City Council Meetings: Ordinance No.2012- Page 1 a. During the months of September through May, City Council Meetings shall be regularly scheduled to convene on the 2nd and4th Tuesday of each month_at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. For the months of June, July, and August, City Council Meetings shall be regularly scheduled to convene on the 4th Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. b. City Council Meetings shall be generally conducted according to the agenda template attached hereto (most recent template will be attached). c. No application presented during a public hearing shall be voted on during the same City Council meeting in which that public hearing is held. This provision may be waived by a supermajority of the City Council. d. City Council meeting agenda items may be added by the Mayor, ^ens°„t of fouf (4) aldefm -a or majority approval from a dire do aem a committee. e. The Mayor shall preside over City Council meeting as the Chairman,unless the Mayor is unavailable, at which time the Mayor Pro Tem shall preside. f. The City Council shall appoint the Mayor Pro Tem at the first City Council meeting each May. The appointment shall occur by calling for open nominations at the meeting, and then a roll call votes on the nominations. Section 2. Procedures for Committee of the Whole Meetings: a. During the months of June, July, and August Committee of the Whole meetings shall be regularly scheduled to convene on the 2nd Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. b. Committee of the Whole agenda items may be added by the Mayor or any alderman. c. Committee of the Whole Meetings shall be generally conducted according to the template attached hereto. d. Each section of the Committee of the Whole meeting shall be presided over by the respective Committee's Chairman, or in the absence of the chairman, by the vice-chairman. e. The intent of the Committee of the Whole is that each agenda item is discussed by the City Council as a whole, prior to its movement onto a subsequent City Council meeting (as directed by the Mayor or any four aldermen). Section 3. Procedures for Committee Meetings: a. During the months of September through May, Committee meetings shall be regularly held monthly, at the dates, times and locations as approved by the Committees. Ordinance No.2012- Page 2 b. The Mayor shall be a non-voting member of all standing committees. c. The Mayor shall select committee rosters at the first City Council meeting in May following a municipal consolidated election(i.e. every two years). d. Committee rosters may be switched by mutual, unanimous consent of the aldermen trading seats and the Mayor. e. The Mayor shall select committee chairmen and vice-chairmen. f. Any alderman may add any agenda item to any committee agenda. g. Chairmen shall select liaisons to other organizations and boards by any means they deem necessary, provided that the other organizations by-laws may govern the selection of the liaison. h. The four committees shall be: i. Administration ii. Economic Development iii. Public Safety iv. Public Works i. Each committee shall be presided over by its chairman, or in the absence of the chairman, the vice-chairman. j. Committee meetings may be cancelled by the Chairman of the committee if there is a not a quorum of the members present, or there are no agenda items which require action by a committee. k. When moving items from the committee agenda to a City Council agenda, the committee shall make a recommendation whether that item should be on consent agenda or the committee's report. If on the committee's report, the committee shall make a recommendation whether the item is up for first reading, or is on the City Council agenda for action. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this Day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Ordinance No.2012- Page 3 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this Day of , A.D. 2012. MAYOR Ordinance No.2012- Page 4 `� I3 fry Reviewed By: �� �•s► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ ADM—OB #1 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ ��1r�� Police F-1 Public 2012-19 LE Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Countryside Development Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: An update on development proposals and consideration of a refinancing of existing debt. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Direction on refinancing Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: `,SAD C►p 011% Memorandum To: City Council EST 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: June 7, 2012 �.MQW* Subject: Countryside Center LE Summary Discussion of the current status of the Countryside Development, and weighing an option for refinancing the existing debt. Background This item was last discussed at the April Administration Committee meeting. The memo from that meeting is attached. At that meeting, the Committee expressed their flexibility in development plans, standards and land uses for the Countryside property. The Committee also discussed interest in seeing a refinanced debt service schedule. We have attached a brief summary memo and refinancing debt service schedule from the City's bond underwriter. Development Update Lynn Dubajic has met with two different groups of developers, and one has indicated they intend to move forward by negotiating with the current property owner(a Bank of America subsidiary). Because they have not come to terms on a contract, they are not ready to make their development plans public. All parties that have contacted Lynn have done so under the assumption that there would be about $2 million in TIF incentives available. Refinancing proposal As requested by the committee, a refinancing proposal is attached. This proposal extends the debt service schedule out 4 more years, to 2028. By doing so, the City incurs additional interest(about $245,000 in today's dollars)throughout the life of the term, but reduces the payment each year throughout the life of the term. While the payment amount each year is less than the current bond, if we refinance we lose all current bond funds in the refunding -meaning, there is no pot of money to make next year's bond payment. So, instead of having negative cash-flow in 2019 in the current bond, we would have negative cash-flow in 2013 (albeit in smaller amounts). Under this scenario, the existing funds to incent a developer to develop are also lost. Recommendation Given that we have potential interest from a developer who wants TIF incentives, staff recommendation is to hold off on refinancing discussions. CA llllani �lair MEMORANDUM To: Bart Olson Kathy Orr From: Peter Raphael Re: Countryside TIF Date: May 21, 2012 We have prepared a refunding analysis of the Series 2005 Alternate Revenue Bonds that were originally issued to fund the development at Countryside Plaza. Due to the lack of TIF revenues we are proposing the following structure to ease the cash flow issues: • Refund the 2005 Bonds with a new Series 2012 Alternate Revenue Bond. • Use the approximately$2 million of remaining original proceeds to help fund the escrow and reduce the par amount of the new bonds (the Bonds are callable in 2015). • Extend the maturity to 2024,the termination date for the TIF. • Defer principal until 2017. Based on these assumptions the City's debt service would decrease as per the attached schedules through 2024 but would continue four additional years versus the current debt service schedule. On a present value basis this structure will cost the City an additional$245,000 assuming no development occurs however it will free up approximately$250,000 per year through 2016. The second alternative would be to continue to draw down on the$2 million of original proceeds to pay the debt service. Under this scenario the $2 million of original proceeds would be expended by 2018 at which time there would be$1,600,000 of bonds outstanding and$1,850,000 of debt service remaining. However there could be a tax issue with this scenario if the rest of the proceeds were used for private purposes. We need to determine the use of the Series 2005 Bonds to be certain. William Blair&Company,L.L.C. 222 West Adams Street Chicago,Illinois 60606 +1312 236 1600 tel May 21,2012 8:41 am Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 7.001 Yorkville Series 2005 Alternate Revenu TIF Bonds:TIF-2012,2012) Page 1 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS 2012 Refunding Dated Date 09/01/2012 Delivery Date 09/01/2012 Sources: Bond Proceeds: Par Amount 1,390,000.00 Other Sources of Funds: TIF Fund Balance 2,000,000.00 3,390,000.00 Uses: Refunding Escrow Deposits: Cash Deposit 0.67 SLGS Purchases 3,330,191.00 3,330,191.67 Delivery Date Expenses: Cost of Issuance 55,600.00 Other Uses of Funds: Additional Proceeds 4,208.33 3,390,000.00 May 21,2012 8:41 am Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 7.001 Yorkville Series 2005 Alternate Revenu TIF Bonds:TIF-2012,2012) Page 2 SUMMARY OF REFUNDING RESULTS 2012 Refunding Dated Date 09/01/2012 Delivery Date 09/01/2012 Arbitrage yield 2.997839% Escrow yield 0.337915% Bond Par Amount 1,390,000.00 True Interest Cost 3.951135% Net Interest Cost 3.980901% Average Coupon 3.980901% Average Life 11.185 Par amount of refunded bonds 3,015,000.00 Average coupon of refunded bonds 4.214550% Average life of refunded bonds 6.849 PV of prior debt to 09/01/2012 @ 2.997839% 3,264,640.81 Net PV Savings -245,482.44 Percentage savings of refunded bonds -8.142038% Percentage savings of refunding bonds -17.660607% May 21,2012 8:41 am Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 7.001 Yorkville Series 2005 Alternate Revenu TIF Bonds:TIF-2012,2012) Page 3 SAVINGS 2012 Refunding Present Value Prior Refunding to 09/01/2012 Date Debt Service Debt Service Savings @ 2.9978391% 12/01/2012 242,333.75 13,200.63 229,133.12 227,434.93 12/01/2013 302,737.50 52,802.50 249,935.00 241,278.34 12/01/2014 305,522.50 52,802.50 252,720.00 236,758.72 12/01/2015 302,722.50 52,802.50 249,920.00 227,222.56 12/01/2016 304,722.50 52,802.50 251,920.00 222,270.52 12/01/2017 306,322.50 147,802.50 158,520.00 135,808.48 12/01/2018 302,522.50 150,332.50 152,190.00 126,531.74 12/01/2019 303,072.50 147,532.50 155,540.00 125,481.91 12/01/2020 303,202.50 149,482.50 153,720.00 120,339.27 12/01/2021 307,912.50 150,965.00 156,947.50 119,223.59 12/01/2022 311,992.50 147,005.00 164,987.50 121,616.28 12/01/2023 310,305.00 147,825.00 162,480.00 116,216.37 12/01/2024 313,050.00 148,225.00 164,825.00 114,398.03 12/01/2025 148,305.00 -148,305.00 -100,101.22 12/01/2026 148,055.00 -148,055.00 -96,977.14 12/01/2027 147,465.00 -147,465.00 -93,732.61 12/01/2028 151,525.00 -151,525.00 -93,460.54 3,916,418.75 2,008,930.63 1,907,488.12 1,750,309.23 Savings Summary_ PV of savings from cash flow 1,750,309.23 Less:Prior funds on hand -2,000,000.00 Plus:Refunding funds on hand 4,208.33 Net PV Savings -245,482.44 May 21,2012 8:41 am Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 7.001 Yorkville Series 2005 Alternate Revenu TIF Bonds:TIF-2012,2012) Page 4 PRIOR BOND DEBT SERVICE 2012 Refunding 2005 Period Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service 12/01/2012 180,000 3.850% 62,333.75 242,333.75 12/01/2013 185,000 3.900% 117,737.50 302,737.50 12/01/2014 195,000 4.000% 110,522.50 305,522.50 12/01/2015 200,000 4.000% 102,722.50 302,722.50 12/01/2016 210,000 4.000% 94,722.50 304,722.50 12/01/2017 220,000 4.000% 86,322.50 306,322.50 12/01/2018 225,000 4.200% 77,522.50 302,522.50 12/01/2019 235,000 4.200% 68,072.50 303,072.50 12/01/2020 245,000 4.200% 58,202.50 303,202.50 12/01/2021 260,000 4.200% 47,912.50 307,912.50 12/01/2022 275,000 4.250% 36,992.50 311,992.50 12/01/2023 285,000 4.300% 25,305.00 310,305.00 12/01/2024 300,000 4.350% 13,050.00 313,050.00 3,015,000 901,418.75 3,916,418.75 May 21,2012 8:41 am Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 7.001 Yorkville Series 2005 Alternate Revenu TIF Bonds:TIF-2012,2012) Page 5 BOND PRICING 2012 Refunding Maturity Bond Component Date Amount Rate Yield Price Serial Bonds: 12/01/2017 95,000 2.600% 2.600% 100.000 12/01/2018 100,000 2.800% 2.800% 100.000 12/01/2019 100,000 3.050% 3.050% 100.000 12/01/2020 105,000 3.350% 3.350% 100.000 12/01/2021 110,000 3.600% 3.600% 100.000 12/01/2022 110,000 3.800% 3.800% 100.000 12/01/2023 115,000 4.000% 4.000% 100.000 12/01/2024 120,000 4.100% 4.100% 100.000 12/01/2025 125,000 4.200% 4.200% 100.000 12/01/2026 130,000 4.300% 4.300% 100.000 12/01/2027 135,000 4.400% 4.400% 100.000 12/01/2028 145,000 4.500% 4.500% 100.000 1,390,000 Dated Date 09/01/2012 Delivery Date 09/01/2012 First Coupon 12/01/2012 Par Amount 1,390,000.00 Original Issue Discount Production 1,390,000.00 100.000000% Underwriter's Discount Purchase Price 1,390,000.00 100.000000% Accrued Interest Net Proceeds 1,390,000.00 May 21,2012 8:41 am Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 7.001 Yorkville Series 2005 Alternate Revenu TIF Bonds:TIF-2012,2012) Page 6 ESCROW REQUIREMENTS 2012 Refunding 2005 Period Principal Ending Principal Interest Redeemed Total 12/01/2012 180,000.00 62,333.75 242,333.75 06/01/2013 58,868.75 58,868.75 12/01/2013 185,000.00 58,868.75 243,868.75 06/01/2014 55,261.25 55,261.25 12/01/2014 195,000.00 55,261.25 250,261.25 06/01/2015 51,361.25 2,455,000.00 2,506,361.25 560,000.00 341,955.00 2,455,000.00 3,356,955.00 May 21,2012 8:41 am Prepared by DBC Finance (Finance 7.001 Yorkville Series 2005 Alternate Revenu TIF Bonds:TIF-2012,2012) Page 7 PRIOR BOND DEBT SERVICE 2012 Refunding Period Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service 12/01/2012 180,000 3.850% 62,333.75 242,333.75 12/01/2013 185,000 3.900% 117,737.50 302,737.50 12/01/2014 195,000 4.000% 110,522.50 305,522.50 12/01/2015 200,000 4.000% 102,722.50 302,722.50 12/01/2016 210,000 4.000% 94,722.50 304,722.50 12/01/2017 220,000 4.000% 86,322.50 306,322.50 12/01/2018 225,000 4.200% 77,522.50 302,522.50 12/01/2019 235,000 4.200% 68,072.50 303,072.50 12/01/2020 245,000 4.200% 58,202.50 303,202.50 12/01/2021 260,000 4.200% 47,912.50 307,912.50 12/01/2022 275,000 4.250% 36,992.50 311,992.50 12/01/2023 285,000 4.300% 25,305.00 310,305.00 12/01/2024 300,000 4.350% 13,050.00 313,050.00 3,015,000 901,418.75 3,916,418.75 Memorandum To: Administration Committee EST. -�` Yid 1s36 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: March 9, 2012 C<wrMY Sad �LE ��' Subject: Countryside TIF Summary Discussion of available alternatives for the Countryside Center project, and TIF fund. Background This item was last discussed, briefly, at the February Administration Committee meeting, and prior at the City Council meeting on January 24th in a budget presentation. The purpose of this agenda item is to discuss the available alternatives for the Countryside Center redevelopment project, and for the Countryside TIF fund. The Countryside TIF fund budget, debt service schedule, TIF ordinance, and TIF redevelopment agreements (one in 2005, another in 2008) are attached for your use. Attorney Orr and YEDC Director Lynn Dubajic will be on hand at the meeting to answer questions. The issue The most pressing issue with the Countryside project is articulated in the budget narrative memo: "We are expected to be upside down on this bond in FY 18 (no bond proceeds left to pay debt service scheduled through 2024. This poses a significant drain on cash-flow each year from 2013 until 2024. If this bond could be refinanced, or if we could find a developer to generate property tax increment within the TIF district, this would eliminate our FY 18 event horizon and would improve cashflow." This cash outflow is illustrated on the summary page of the Countryside TIF fund budget. The budget has an annual deficit of $300,000 and the fund balance approaches $0 in FY 17. This assumes though, that absolutely nothing changes with the property between now and 2017. Our options In order to accurately discuss options, it is important to understand the mechanisms of the TIF district—which is why Attorney Orr will be present at the meeting to give everyone a brief "TIF 10 1." In short, the fund has deficits because we issued a bond and incurred a debt obligation, and do not have a TIF revenue stream. The TIF revenue stream is not present because the center was demolished as part of the original TIF agreement. It should be noted that even if the Center would not have been physically torn down, that the economic downturn and vacancy rate (even prior to the downturn)would have likely resulted in a minimal property tax increment—and we would still be studying the same options. Although, if the Center hadn't been torn down, we may not have issued the bond. The first option is to take no action. We would continue to pay the yearly debt service with bond proceeds,until eventually running out of proceeds after the FY 18 payment. At that point,we would still have 7 years of debt service payments to make at $300,000 per year. These payments would have to be made with funds from another budget. This option is should be considered if we think that a developer will develop the site without TIF funds before FY 19, or if we are comfortable with paying 7 years of debt service (—$2.1 million) from 2019 through 2025. The second option is to refinance. Assuming that we could find a bond buyer for the refinancing, we could stretch the existing debt obligation much farther out, incurring additional interest but making the yearly payments much cheaper than they are currently. This option should be considered if we think the property is likely to never be developed and we would prefer to pay less each year but more in total. This option could be considered if we think the property could be developed without TIF funds, but at some point in the next 5-15 years, and we think we could get an extension on our TIF district. In that scenario, refinancing would allow us to decrease the yearly debt obligation and make the payments each year with whatever property taxes are generated on site. That scenario would also require us to extend the TIF district past its current expiration in 2028, which can only be done by the state legislature. The third option is to develop the property with TIF funds. The original TIF agreement in 2005 required the developer to build 80,000 square feet of retail space, prior to distribution of TIF funds. The revised TIF agreement in 2008 increased that requirement to 166,000 square feet. This option would require us to find the equilibrium between what we want on the property vs. what can be built in the current economy for the amount of TIF funds we have left (currently $1.8 million). Lynn Dubajic is prepared to discuss the local economy and potential uses for the site that would meet our requirements. Lowering our requirements in the agreement and inducing someone to build on the property would result in incremental TIF revenues,which we could then use to pay down the yearly obligation. For this scenario, it is recommended that the issue be sent to the Economic Development Committee for further discussion. Of course, there are always other options—which may include a combination of some of the above. Staff will be prepared to discuss all options at the meeting. 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� $ 06 Legal CA#1 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ -_� City Administrator El Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El� wn sw _© Community Development ❑ PS 2012-13 � Police F-1 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Ordinance Amending City Code Adopting Hiring Standards for Part-Time Police Officers Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: New ordinance required by ILETSB for Part-Time Police Officers. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Move forward to City Council for approval. Submitted by: Chief Hart Police Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Ordinance No. 2012- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, ADOPTING HIRING STANDARDS FOR PART-TIME POLICE OFFICERS WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized, and validly existing non home-rule municipality of the State of Illinois under the 1970 Illinois Constitution and the laws of the State of Illinois; and, WHEREAS,the City hires part-time police officers to serve as members of the City's police department; and WHEREAS, Section 3.1-30-21 of the Illinois Municipal Code, (65 ILCS 5/3.1-30-21), mandates that any municipality employing part-time police officers shall, by ordinance, establish hiring standards for part-time police officers and shall submit those standards to the Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board; and WHEREAS,the City to comply with the training requirements of the Illinois Municipal Code hereby adopts this ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Title 5, Chapter 1, of the United City of Yorkville Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by deleting section 5-1-7 in its entirety and replacing it with the following: "7. HIRING STANDARDS FOR PART-TIME POLICE OFFICERS: All police officers, other than those officers who shall be employed on a full-time basis, shall be qualified to enter and successfully complete any training mandated for part-time police officers by the Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board including the Illinois Police Training Act (50 ILCS 705/8.2) and the Illinois Peace Officer Firearm Training Act(50 ILCS 710/0.01 et seq.). A part-time police officer shall have all of the responsibilities of a full-time police officer and such specific duties as delineated in the Rules &Regulations and Policies &Procedures of the Yorkville Police Department. The number of hours a part-time officer may work within a calendar year is restricted. Part-time police officers shall not be assigned to supervise or direct full-time police officers. Part- time police officers shall be trained in accordance with the Illinois Police Training Act(50 ILCS 705/1 et.seq.) and the rules and requirements of the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board(ILETSB). Any person employed as a part-time police officer must meet the following minimum standards: 1. Be of good moral character, of temperate habits, of sound health, and physically and mentally able to perform assigned duties. 2. Be at least twenty-one (2 1) years of age. 3. Possess a high school diploma or GED certificate. 4. Possess a valid State of Illinois driver's license. 5. Possess no prior felony convictions. 6. Any individual who has served in the US Military must have been honorably discharged." Section 2. That a certified copy of this Ordinance establishing hiring standards for part- time police officers employed by the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, shall be filed with the Illinois Law Enforcement Training Standards Board, as required by statute. Section 3. That Ordinance No. 2011-15, entitled,An Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, Adopting Hiring Standards for Part-Time Police Officers,be and is hereby repealed. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , 2012. CITY CLERK CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2012. MAYOR 2 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 6 Legal ❑ CA#2 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ■ Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ ADM 2012-36 Police ALE ��' Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Prevailing Wage Ordinance Meeting and Date: COW 6/12/12 Synopsis: Ordinance that declares city's compliance with the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Lisa Pickering Clerk's Office Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Please see attached information. Memorandum EST. �� lass To: Mayor and City Council O From: Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator �' �MMA °ty '� Date: June 5, 2012 LE Subject: Prevailing Wage Ordinance The city is required by state statute during the month of June of each year, to investigate and ascertain the prevailing rate of wages as defined in 820 ILCS 130—Prevailing Wage Act. To accomplish this, the city annually approves an ordinance declaring compliance with the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act. The purpose of the Prevailing Wage Act is to ensure that the general prevailing rate of wages for laborers, mechanics, and other workers engaged in the construction of public works coming under the jurisdiction of the city are the same as the prevailing rate of wages for construction work in the Kendall County area. The rate of wages is determined by the Illinois Department of Labor. I have attached the ordinance along with the list of Kendall County prevailing wages for June 2012. After the approval of the ordinance by City Council, a copy of the ordinance will be publicly posted in the glass case in the lobby, a public notice will be placed in the newspaper, and certified copies will be filed with the Secretary of State and the Illinois Department of Labor. ORDINANCE NO. 2012 - AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE'S COMPLIANCE WITH ILLINOIS PREVAILING WAGE ACT WHEREAS,the State of Illinois has enacted"An ACT regulating wages of laborers, mechanics, and other workers employed in any public works by the State, County, City or any public body or any political subdivision or by anyone under contract for public works," approved June 26, 1941, as amended, being Chapter 820 ILCS 130/1-12 Illinois Compiled Statutes; and WHEREAS, the aforesaid Act requires that the United City of Yorkville investigate and ascertain the prevailing rate of wages as defined in said Act for laborers, mechanics, and other workers in the locality of said City employed in performing construction of public works, for said City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. As required by"An Act regulating wages of laborers, mechanics and other workers employed in any public works by the State, County, City or any public body or any political subdivision or by anyone under contract for public works" approved June 26, 1941, as amended, the general prevailing rate of wages in the locality for laborers, mechanics, and other workers engaged in the construction of public works coming under the jurisdiction of this City is hereby ascertained to be the same as the prevailing rate of wages for construction work in the Kendall County area as determined by the Department of Labor and the State of Illinois as of June 2012, a copy of that determination being attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and incorporated herein by reference. The definition of any terms appearing in this Ordinance which are also used in the aforesaid Act shall be the same as in said Act. Section 2. Nothing herein shall be construed to apply said general prevailing rate of wages as herein ascertained to any work or employment except public works of this City to the extent required by the aforesaid Act. Section 3. The City Clerk shall publicly post or keep available for inspection by any interested party in the main office of this City this determination of such prevailing rate of wage. Section 4. The City Clerk shall mail a copy of this determination to any employer, and to any association of employers and to any person or association of employees who have filed or file their names and addresses, requesting copies of any determination stating the particular rates and the particular class of workers whose wages will be affected by such rates. Section 5. The City shall promptly file a certified copy of this Ordinance with both the Secretary of State Index Division and the Department of Labor of the State of Illinois. Ordinance No.2012- Page 1 Section 6. The City Clerk shall cause a notice to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the area that the determination of prevailing wages has been made. Said notice shall conform substantially to the notice attached hereto as Exhibit`B". Such publication shall constitute notice that this is the determination of the City and is effective. PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this Day of , A.D. 2012. City Clerk CHRIS FUNKHOUSER GEORGE GILSON,JR. CARLO COLOSIMO DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS LARRY KOT APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this Day of , A.D. 2012. Mayor Ordinance No.2012- Page 2 Kendall County Prevailing Wage for June 2012 http://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/rates/EVENMO/KENDALL9.htm Kendall County Prevailing Wage for June 2012 (See explanation of column headings at bottom of wages) Trade Name RG TYP C Base FRMAN *M-F>8 OSA OSH H/W Pensn Vac Trng ASBESTOS ABT-GEN ALL 35.200 35.700 1.5 1.5 2.0 12.18 8.820 0.000 0.450 ASBESTOS ABT-MEC BLD 32.850 0.000 1.5 1.5 2.0 10.82 10. 66 0.000 0.720 BOILERMAKER BLD 43.450 47.360 2.0 2.0 2.0 6. 970 14. 66 0.000 0.350 BRICK MASON BLD 39.780 43.760 1.5 1.5 2.0 9.300 11.17 0.000 0.730 CARPENTER ALL 40.770 42.770 1.5 1.5 2.0 12.34 11.26 0.000 0.530 CEMENT MASON ALL 41.550 43.550 2.0 1.5 2.0 9.250 12.51 0.000 0.250 CERAMIC TILE FNSHER BLD 33.600 0.000 2.0 1.5 2.0 9.200 6. 680 0.000 0.580 COMMUNICATION TECH BLD 36.390 38.490 1.5 1.5 2.0 10.02 10.19 0.000 1.090 ELECTRIC PWR EQMT OP ALL 35.400 48.110 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.000 10. 97 0.000 0.270 ELECTRIC PWR GRNDMAN ALL 27.380 48.110 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.000 8.490 0.000 0.210 ELECTRIC PWR LINEMAN ALL 42.390 48.110 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.000 13.14 0.000 0.320 ELECTRIC PWR TRK DRV ALL 28.350 48.110 1.5 1.5 2.0 5.000 8.790 0.000 0.220 ELECTRICIAN BLD 43.560 47.920 1.5 1.5 2.0 10.02 12.20 0.000 1.310 ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTOR BLD 48.560 54.630 2.0 2.0 2.0 11.03 11.96 2. 910 0.000 FENCE ERECTOR ALL 44.950 47.200 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.890 17. 69 0.000 0.400 GLAZIER BLD 38.500 40.000 1.5 2.0 2.0 11.49 14. 64 0.000 0.840 HT/FROST INSULATOR BLD 43.800 46.300 1.5 1.5 2.0 10.82 11.86 0.000 0.720 IRON WORKER ALL 44.950 47.200 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.890 17. 69 0.000 0.400 LABORER ALL 35.200 35.950 1.5 1.5 2.0 11. 97 9.030 0.000 0.450 LATHER ALL 40.770 42.770 1.5 1.5 2.0 12.34 11.26 0.000 0.530 MACHINIST BLD 43.160 45.160 1.5 1.5 2.0 7. 980 8. 950 0.000 0.000 MARBLE FINISHERS ALL 29.100 0.000 1.5 1.5 2.0 9.300 11.17 0.000 0. 660 MARBLE MASON BLD 39.030 42.930 1.5 1.5 2.0 9.300 11.17 0.000 0.730 MATERIAL TESTER I ALL 25.200 0.000 1.5 1.5 2.0 11. 97 9.030 0.000 0.450 MATERIALS TESTER II ALL 30.200 0.000 1.5 1.5 2.0 11. 97 9.030 0.000 0.450 MILLWRIGHT ALL 40.770 42.770 1.5 1.5 2.0 12.34 11.26 0.000 0.530 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 1 45.100 49.100 2.0 2.0 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 2 43.800 49.100 2.0 2.0 2.0 14.40 9.550 1.900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 3 41.250 49.100 2.0 2.0 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 4 39.500 49.100 2.0 2.0 2.0 14.40 9.550 1.900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 5 48.850 49.100 2.0 2.0 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 6 46.100 49.100 2.0 2.0 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER BLD 7 48.100 49.100 2.0 2.0 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 1 43.300 47.300 1.5 1.5 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 2 42.750 47.300 1.5 1.5 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 3 40.700 47.300 1.5 1.5 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 4 39.300 47.300 1.5 1.5 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 5 38.100 47.300 1.5 1.5 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 6 46.300 47.300 1.5 1.5 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 OPERATING ENGINEER HWY 7 44.300 47.300 1.5 1.5 2.0 14.40 9.550 1. 900 1.250 ORNAMNTL IRON WORKER ALL 44.950 47.200 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.890 17. 69 0.000 0.400 PAINTER ALL 40.180 42.180 1.5 1.5 1.5 8.950 8.200 0.000 1.250 PAINTER SIGNS BLD 33.920 38.090 1.5 1.5 1.5 2. 600 2.710 0.000 0.000 PILEDRIVER ALL 40.770 42.770 1.5 1.5 2.0 12.34 11.26 0.000 0.530 PIPEFITTER BLD 41.000 43.000 1.5 1.5 2.0 10.75 14.59 0.000 1. 660 PLASTERER BLD 39.250 41.610 1.5 1.5 2.0 10. 60 10. 69 0.000 0.550 PLUMBER BLD 41.000 43.000 1.5 1.5 2.0 10.75 14.59 0.000 1.660 ROOFER BLD 37.650 40.650 1.5 1.5 2.0 8.380 6.820 0.000 0.430 SHEETMETAL WORKER BLD 41.660 43.660 1.5 1.5 2.0 9.540 11.57 0.000 0.780 SPRINKLER FITTER BLD 49.200 51.200 1.5 1.5 2.0 9.750 8.200 0.000 0.450 STEEL ERECTOR ALL 44.950 47.200 2.0 2.0 2.0 8.890 17. 69 0.000 0.400 STONE MASON BLD 39.780 43.760 1.5 1.5 2.0 9.300 11.17 0.000 0.730 TERRAZZO FINISHER BLD 35.150 0.000 1.5 1.5 2.0 9.200 9.070 0.000 0.430 TERRAZZO MASON BLD 39.010 42.010 1.5 1.5 2.0 9.200 10.41 0.000 0.510 TILE MASON BLD 40.490 44.490 2.0 1.5 2.0 9.200 8.390 0.000 0. 640 1 of 6 6/5/2012 2:13 PM Kendall County Prevailing Wage for June 2012 http://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/rates/EVENMO/KENDALL9.htm TRUCK DRIVER ALL 1 35.650 36.200 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.670 4.725 0.000 0.250 TRUCK DRIVER ALL 2 35.800 36.200 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.670 4.725 0.000 0.250 TRUCK DRIVER ALL 3 36.000 36.200 1.5 1.5 2.0 6.670 4.725 0.000 0.250 TRUCK DRIVER ALL 4 36.200 36.200 1.5 1.5 2.0 6. 670 4.725 0.000 0.250 TUCKPOINTER BLD 39.950 40.950 1.5 1.5 2.0 8.180 10.57 0.000 0.790 Legend: RG (Region) TYP (Trade Type - All,Highway,Building,Floating,Oil & Chip,Rivers) C (Class) Base (Base Wage Rate) FRMAN (Foreman Rate) M-F>8 (OT required for any hour greater than 8 worked each day, Mon through Fri. OSA (Overtime (OT) is required for every hour worked on Saturday) OSH (Overtime is required for every hour worked on Sunday and Holidays) H/W (Health & Welfare Insurance) Pensn (Pension) Vac (Vacation) Trng (Training) Explanations KENDALL COUNTY The following list is considered as those days for which holiday rates of wages for work performed apply: New Years Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day and Veterans Day in some classifications/counties. Generally, any of these holidays which fall on a Sunday is celebrated on the following Monday. This then makes work performed on that Monday payable at the appropriate overtime rate for holiday pay. Common practice in a given local may alter certain days of celebration. If in doubt, please check with IDOL. EXPLANATION OF CLASSES ASBESTOS - GENERAL - removal of asbestos material/mold and hazardous materials from any place in a building, including mechanical systems where those mechanical systems are to be removed. This includes the removal of asbestos materials/mold and hazardous materials from ductwork or pipes in a building when the building is to be demolished at the time or at some close future date. ASBESTOS - MECHANICAL - removal of asbestos material from mechanical systems, such as pipes, ducts, and boilers, where the mechanical systems are to remain. CERAMIC TILE FINISHER The grouting, cleaning, and polishing of all classes of tile, whether for interior or exterior purposes, all burned, glazed or unglazed products; all composition materials, granite tiles, warning detectable tiles, cement tiles, epoxy composite materials, pavers, glass, mosaics, fiberglass, and all substitute materials, for tile made in tile-like units; all mixtures in tile like form of cement, metals, and other materials that are for and intended for use as a finished floor surface, stair treads, promenade roofs, walks, walls, ceilings, swimming pools, and all other places where tile is to form a finished interior or exterior. The mixing of all setting mortars including but not limited to thin-set mortars, epoxies, wall mud, and any other sand and cement mixtures or adhesives when used in the preparation, installation, repair, or maintenance of tile and/or similar materials. The handling and unloading of all sand, cement, lime, tile, fixtures, equipment, adhesives, or any other materials to be used in the preparation, installation, repair, or maintenance of tile and/or similar materials. Ceramic Tile Finishers shall fill all joints and 2 of 6 6/5/2012 2:13 PM Kendall County Prevailing Wage for June 2012 http://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/rates/EVENMO/KENDALL9.htm voids regardless of method on all tile work, particularly and especially after installation of said tile work. Application of any and all protective coverings to all types of tile installations including, but not be limited to, all soap compounds, paper products, tapes, and all polyethylene coverings, plywood, masonite, cardboard, and any new type of products that may be used to protect tile installations, Blastrac equipment, and all floor scarifying equipment used in preparing floors to receive tile. The clean up and removal of all waste and materials. All demolition of existing tile floors and walls to be re-tiled. COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN Construction, installation, maintenance and removal of telecommunication facilities (voice, sound, data and video) , telephone, security, and data inside wire, interconnect, terminal equipment, central offices, PABX and equipment, micro waves, V-SAT, bypass, CATV, WAN (wide area network) , LAN (local area networks) , and ISDN (integrated system digital network) , pulling of wire in raceways, but not the installation of raceways. MARBLE FINISHER Loading and unloading trucks, distribution of all materials (all stone, sand, etc. ) , stocking of floors with material, performing all rigging for heavy work, the handling of all material that may be needed for the installation of such materials, building of scaffolding, polishing if needed, patching, waxing of material if damaged, pointing up, caulking, grouting and cleaning of marble, holding water on diamond or Carborundum blade or saw for setters cutting, use of tub saw or any other saw needed for preparation of material, drilling of holes for wires that anchor material set by setters, mixing up of molding plaster for installation of material, mixing up thin set for the installation of material, mixing up of sand to cement for the installation of material and such other work as may be required in helping a Marble Setter in the handling of all material in the erection or installation of interior marble, slate, travertine, art marble, serpentine, alberene stone, blue stone, granite and other stones (meaning as to stone any foreign or domestic materials as are specified and used in building interiors and exteriors and customarily known as stone in the trade) , carrara, sanionyx, vitrolite and similar opaque glass and the laying of all marble tile, terrazzo tile, slate tile and precast tile, steps, risers treads, base, or any other materials that may be used as substitutes for any of the aforementioned materials and which are used on interior and exterior which are installed in a similar manner. MATERIAL TESTER I: Hand coring and drilling for testing of materials; field inspection of uncured concrete and asphalt. MATERIAL TESTER II: Field inspection of welds, structural steel, fireproofing, masonry, soil, facade, reinforcing steel, formwork, cured concrete, and concrete and asphalt batch plants; adjusting proportions of bituminous mixtures. OPERATING ENGINEER - BUILDING Class 1. Asphalt Plant; Asphalt Spreader; Autograde; Backhoes with Caisson Attachment; Batch Plant; Benoto (requires Two Engineers) ; Boiler and Throttle Valve; Caisson Rigs; Central Redi-Mix Plant; Combination Back Hoe Front End-loader Machine; Compressor and Throttle Valve; Concrete Breaker (Truck Mounted) ; Concrete Conveyor; Concrete Conveyor (Truck Mounted) ; Concrete Paver Over 27E cu. ft; Concrete 3 of 6 6/5/2012 2:13 PM Kendall County Prevailing Wage for June 2012 http://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/rates/EVENMO/KENDALL9.htm Paver 27E cu. ft. and Under: Concrete Placer; Concrete Placing Boom; Concrete Pump (Truck Mounted) ; Concrete Tower; Cranes, All; Cranes, Hammerhead; Cranes, (GCI and similar Type) ; Creter Crane; Crusher, Stone, etc. ; Derricks, All; Derricks, Traveling; Formless Curb and Gutter Machine; Grader, Elevating; Grouting Machines; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloader 2-1/4 yd. and over; Hoists, Elevators, outside type rack and pinion and similar machines; Hoists, One, Two and Three Drum; Hoists, Two Tugger One Floor; Hydraulic Backhoes; Hydraulic Boom Trucks; Hydro Vac (and similar equipment) ; Locomotives, All; Motor Patrol; Lubrication Technician; Manipulators; Pile Drivers and Skid Rig; Post Hole Digger; Pre-Stress Machine; Pump Cretes Dual Ram; Pump Cretes: Squeeze Cretes-Screw Type Pumps; Gypsum Bulker and Pump; Raised and Blind Hole Drill; Roto Mill Grinder; Scoops - Tractor Drawn; Slip-Form Paver; Straddle Buggies; Tournapull; Tractor with Boom and Side Boom; Trenching Machines. Class 2. Boilers; Broom, All Power Propelled; Bulldozers; Concrete Mixer (Two Bag and Over) ; Conveyor, Portable; Forklift Trucks; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloaders under 2-1/4 yd. ; Hoists, Automatic; Hoists, Inside Elevators; Hoists, Sewer Dragging Machine; Hoists, Tugger Single Drum; Rock Drill (Self-Propelled) ; Rock Drill (Truck Mounted) ; Rollers, All; Steam Generators; Tractors, All; Tractor Drawn Vibratory Roller; Winch Trucks with "A" Frame. Class 3. Air Compressor; Combination Small Equipment Operator; Generators; Heaters, Mechanical; Hoists, Inside Elevators; Hydraulic Power Units (Pile Driving, Extracting, and Drilling) ; Pumps, over 3" (1 to 3 not to exceed a total of 300 ft. ) ; Low Boys; Pumps, Well Points; Welding Machines (2 through 5) ; Winches, 4 Small Electric Drill Winches; Bobcats (up to and including 3/ cu yd. ) . Class 4. Bobcats and/or other Skid Steer Loaders (other than bobcats up to and including 9/ cu yd. ) ; Oilers; and Brick Forklift. Class 5. Assistant Craft Foreman. Class 6. Gradall Class 7. Mechanics. OPERATING ENGINEERS - HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION Class 1. Asphalt Plant; Asphalt Heater and Planer Combination; Asphalt Heater Scarfire; Asphalt Spreader; Autograder/GOMACO or other similar type machines: ABG Paver; Backhoes with Caisson Attachment; Ballast Regulator; Belt Loader; Caisson Rigs; Car Dumper; Central Redi-Mix Plant; Combination Backhoe Front Endloader Machine, (1 cu. yd. Backhoe Bucket or over or with attachments) ; Concrete Breaker (Truck Mounted) ; Concrete Conveyor; Concrete Paver over 27E cu. ft. ; Concrete Placer; Concrete Tube Float; Cranes, all attachments; Cranes, Tower Cranes of all types: Creter Crane: Crusher, Stone, etc. ; Derricks, All; Derrick Boats; Derricks, Traveling; Dowell Machine with Air Compressor; Dredges; Formless Curb and Gutter Machine; Grader, Elevating; Grader, Motor Grader, Motor Patrol, Auto Patrol, Form Grader, Pull Grader, Subgrader; Guard Rail Post Driver Truck Mounted; Hoists, One, Two and Three Drum; Hydraulic Backhoes; Backhoes with shear attachments; Lubrication Technician; Manipulators; Mucking Machine; Pile Drivers and Skid Rig; Pre-Stress Machine; Pump Cretes Dual Ram; Rock Drill - Crawler or Skid Rig; Rock Drill - Truck Mounted; Rock/Track Tamper; Roto Mill Grinder; Slip-Form Paver; Soil Test Drill Rig (Truck Mounted) ; Straddle Buggies; Hydraulic Telescoping Form (Tunnel) ; Tractor Drawn Belt Loader (with attached pusher - two engineers) ; Tractor with Boom; Tractaire with 4 of 6 6/5/2012 2:13 PM Kendall County Prevailing Wage for June 2012 http://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/rates/EVENMO/KENDALL9.htm Attachments; Trenching Machine; Truck Mounted Concrete Pump with Boom; Raised or Blind Hole Drills (Tunnel Shaft) ; Underground Boring and/or Mining Machines 5 ft. in diameter and over tunnel, etc; Underground Boring and/or Mining Machines under 5 ft. in diameter; Wheel Excavator; Widener (APSCO) . Class 2. Batch Plant; Bituminous Mixer; Boiler and Throttle Valve; Bulldozers; Car Loader Trailing Conveyors; Combination Backhoe Front Endloader Machine (Less than 1 cu. yd. Backhoe Bucket or over or with attachments) ; Compressor and Throttle Valve; Compressor, Common Receiver (3) ; Concrete Breaker or Hydro Hammer; Concrete Grinding Machine; Concrete Mixer or Paver 7S Series to and including 27 cu. ft. ; Concrete Spreader; Concrete Curing Machine, Burlap Machine, Belting Machine and Sealing Machine; Concrete Wheel Saw; Conveyor Muck Cars (Haglund or Similar Type) ; Drills, All; Finishing Machine - Concrete; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloader; Hoist - Sewer Dragging Machine; Hydraulic Boom Trucks (All Attachments) ; Hydro-Blaster; All Locomotives, Dinky; Off-Road Hauling Units (including articulating) /2 ton capacity or more; Non Self-Loading Ejection Dump; Pump Cretes: Squeeze Cretes - Screw Type Pumps, Gypsum Bulker and Pump; Roller, Asphalt; Rotary Snow Plows; Rototiller, Seaman, etc. , self-propelled; Scoops - Tractor Drawn; Self-Propelled Compactor; Spreader - Chip - Stone, etc. ; Scraper; Scraper - Prime Mover in Tandem (Regardless of Size) : Tank Car Heater; Tractors, Push, Pulling Sheeps Foot, Disc, Compactor, etc. ; Tug Boats. Class 3. Boilers; Brooms, All Power Propelled; Cement Supply Tender; Compressor, Common Receiver (2) ; Concrete Mixer (Two Bag and Over) ; Conveyor, Portable; Farm-Type Tractors Used for Mowing, Seeding, etc. ; Fireman on Boilers; Forklift Trucks; Grouting Machine; Hoists, Automatic; Hoists, All Elevators; Hoists, Tugger Single Drum; Jeep Diggers; Low Boys; Pipe Jacking Machines; Post-Hole Digger; Power Saw, Concrete Power Driven; Pug Mills; Rollers, other than Asphalt; Seed and Straw Blower; Steam Generators; Stump Machine; Winch Trucks with "A" Frame; Work Boats; Tamper-Form-Motor Driven. Class 4. Air Compressor; Combination - Small Equipment Operator; Directional Boring Machine; Generators; Heaters, Mechanical; Hydraulic Power Unit (Pile Driving, Extracting, or Drilling) ; Hydro- Blaster; Light Plants, All (1 through 5) ; Pumps, over 3" (1 to 3 not to exceed a total of 300 ft. ) ; Pumps, Well Points; Tractaire; Welding Machines (2 through 5) ; Winches, 4 Small Electric Drill Winches. Class 5. Bobcats (all) ; Brick Forklifts; Oilers. Class 6. Field Mechanics and Field Welders Class 7. Gradall and machines of like nature. TRUCK DRIVER - BUILDING, HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION Class 1. Two or three Axle Trucks. A-frame Truck when used for transportation purposes; Air Compressors and Welding Machines, including those pulled by cars, pick-up trucks and tractors; Ambulances Batch Gate Lockers; Batch Hopperman; Car and Truck Washers; Carry-alls; Fork Lifts and Hoisters; Helpers; Mechanics Helpers and Greasers; Oil Distributors 2-man operation; Pavement Breakers; Pole Trailer, up to 40 feet; Power Mower Tractors; Self-propelled Chip Spreader; Skipman; Slurry Trucks, 2-man operation; Slurry Truck Conveyor Operation, 2 or 3 man; Teamsters; Unskilled Dumpman; and Truck Drivers hauling warning lights, barricades, and portable toilets on the job site. 5 of 6 6/5/2012 2:13 PM Kendall County Prevailing Wage for June 2012 http://www.state.il.us/agency/idol/rates/EVENMO/KENDALL9.htm Class 2. Four axle trucks; Dump Crets and Adgetors under 7 yards; Dumpsters, Track Trucks, Euclids, Hug Bottom Dump Turnapulls or Turnatrailers when pulling other than self-loading equipment or similar equipment under 16 cubic yards; Mixer Trucks under 7 yeards; Ready-mix Plant Hopper Operator, and Winch Trucks, 2 Axles. Class 3. Five axle trucks; Dump Crets and Adgetors 7 yards and over; Dumpsters, Track Trucks, Euclids, Hug Bottom Dump Turnatrailers or turnapulls when pulling other than self-loading equipment or similar equipment over 16 cubic yards; Explosives and/or Fission Material Trucks; Mixer Trucks 7 yards or over; Mobile Cranes while in transit; Oil Distributors, 1-man operation; Pole Trailer, over 40 feet; Pole and Expandable Trailers hauling material over 50 feet long; Slurry trucks, 1-man operation; Winch trucks, 3 axles or more; Mechanic--Truck Welder and Truck Painter. Class 4. Six axle trucks; Dual-purpose vehicles, such as mounted crane trucks with hoist and accessories; Foreman; Master Mechanic; Self-loading equipment like P.B. and trucks with scoops on the front. TERRAZZO FINISHER The handling of sand, cement, marble chips, and all other materials that may be used by the Mosaic Terrazzo Mechanic, and the mixing, grinding, grouting, cleaning and sealing of all Marble, Mosaic, and Terrazzo work, floors, base, stairs, and wainscoting by hand or machine, and in addition, assisting and aiding Marble, Masonic, and Terrazzo Mechanics. Other Classifications of Work: For definitions of classifications not otherwise set out, the Department generally has on file such definitions which are available. If a task to be performed is not subject to one of the classifications of pay set out, the Department will upon being contacted state which neighboring county has such a classification and provide such rate, such rate being deemed to exist by reference in this document. If no neighboring county rate applies to the task, the Department shall undertake a special determination, such special determination being then deemed to have existed under this determination. If a project requires these, or any classification not listed, please contact IDOL at 217-782-1710 for wage rates or clarifications. LANDSCAPING Landscaping work falls under the existing classifications for laborer, operating engineer and truck driver. The work performed by landscape plantsman and landscape laborer is covered by the existing classification of laborer. The work performed by landscape operators (regardless of equipment used or its size) is covered by the classifications of operating engineer. The work performed by landscape truck drivers (regardless of size of truck driven) is covered by the classifications of truck driver. 6 of 6 6/5/2012 2:13 PM Exhibit "B" Public Notice Notice of Ordinance No. Prevailing Wage Rates The United City of Yorkville has passed an Ordinance establishing the prevailing rate of wages hereby ascertained to be the same as the prevailing rate of wages for construction work in the Kendall County area as determined by the Department of Labor and the State of Illinois as of June 2012. Anyone wishing to inspect the ordinance may do so at: City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, Monday through Friday, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M. BETH WARREN City Clerk BY: Lisa Pickering Deputy Clerk `� 13 fry Reviewed By: �� �•s► Legal ■ Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ CA#3 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator ■ Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ j� �� ■ AND 2012-37 Police LE Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Ordinance amending City Code regarding Musical Amusements Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Proposal to eliminate the music entertainment license. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid W3s From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: June 7, 2012 C<wrMY Sad �LE 1�' Subject: Ordinance removing music entertainment licenses Summary An ordinance removing the requirement for concert and performance venues to have a music entertainment license. Background This section of City Code was reviewed as part of the mechanical amusement device license agenda item on video gaming. The section of City code to be deleted is listed in the attached ordinance and says: A. License Required; Exemption: 1. It shall be unlawful for any person or persons to own, conduct, manage for gain or give any concert or other musical entertainment in the city without a license. (RO 1882, Ord., 6-18-1881; amd. Ord. 1975-17, 9-25-1975; 1994 Code) 2. A separate license fee for entertainment events shall not be required by the holder of a valid city liquor license where said liquor license holder has paid the entertainment charge required under subsection 3-3-4132 of this title. (Ord. 1996-1, 1-11-1996) As far as we can ascertain, the City has not issued a music entertainment license nor had an entertainment license fee paid for by an applicant in the past two decades. This serial non- enforcement has not caused any operational issues for the Police nor the Clerk's Office, and we could not come up with a good reason why this requirement should remain in City Code. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinance, which will delete the requirement for music entertainment licensing in City limits. Ordinance No. 2012- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, REGARDING MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENTS WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to amend the regulations pertaining to musical entertainments as set forth in the City Code of the United City of Yorkville as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Section 3-4-1 of the City Code is hereby amended by deleting section 3-4-1 "Musical Entertainments" in its entirety. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this Day of , A.D. 2012. CITY CLERK CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this Day of , A.D. 2012. MAYOR 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� 6 Legal ❑ CA#4 EST. 1&36 ■ Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator El r� _© Consultant El ADM 2012-38 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Treasurer's Report for May 2012 Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE TREASURER'S REPORT-for the period ending MAY 31,2012 Cash Basis %of %of Revenues YTD Expenses YTD May Revenues YTD Revenues Budget Budget May Expenses YTD Expenses Budget Budget General Fund 01 -General 1,261,538 1,261,538 12,311,109 10% 641,300 641,300 11,379,867 6% Special Revenue Funds 15-Motor Fuel Tax 33,063 33,063 454,547 7% - - 573,860 0% 79-Parks and Recreation 182,484 182,484 1,451,447 13% 86,196 86,196 1,506,767 6% 72-Land Cash 7,179 7,179 420,500 2% 450 450 323,825 0% 87-Countryside TIF 234 234 6,500 4% 62,334 62,334 306,043 20% 88-Downtown TIF 3,162 3,162 70,150 5% - - 41,500 0% 11 -Fox Hill SSA 551 551 3,786 15% - - 4,500 0% 12-Sunflower SSA 1,370 1,370 7,531 18% - - 9,986 0% Debt Service Fund 42-Debt Service 54,929 54,929 427,144 13% 1,995 1,995 505,370 0% Capital Funds 16-Municipal Building 1,500 1,500 5,250 29% 300 300 - - 22-Park and Recreation Capital 888 888 43,500 2% 208 208 52,500 0% 20-Police Capital 2,908 2,908 29,200 10% 44,942 44,942 60,000 75% 21 -Public Works Capital 8,949 8,949 53,500 17% 7,858 7,858 169,795 5% 23-City-Wide Capital 40,999 40,999 1,303,732 3% 6,040 6,040 1,040,500 1% Enterprise Funds 51-Water 53,701 53,701 2,801,379 2% 444,414 444,414 3,085,983 14% 52-Sewer 330,025 330,025 1,639,817 20% 33,517 33,517 1,895,210 2% 80-Recreation Center 53,251 53,251 622,500 9% 83,103 83,103 703,633 12% Library Funds 82-Library Operations 113,630 113,630 817,634 14% 58,820 58,820 794,413 7% 83-Library Debt Service 115,070 115,070 797,299 14% - - 795,488 0% 84-Library Capital 2,500 2,500 16,350 15% - - 13,474 0% Total Funds 2,267,934 2,267,934 23,282,875 10% 1,471,477 1,471,477 23,262,714 6% As Treasurer of the United City of Yorkville,I hereby attest,to the best of my knowledge,that the information contained in this Treasurer's Report is accurate as of the date detailed herein. Further information is available in the Finance Department. William Powell,Treasurer Prepared by the Finance Department Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 4 ' Legal ❑ 11#1 Finance ❑ EST. -�` _ ti 1s36 Engineer ❑ �:--- g Tracking Number �! City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑❑ EDC 2012-21 ALE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Building Permit Activity Report(April & May 2012) Meeting and Date: COW June 12, 2012 Synopsis: All permits issued in April & May, 2012 Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: N/A Item Number: N/A Type of Vote Required: Informational Council Action Requested: None Submitted by: D. Weinert Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: _ UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE I BUILDING PERMIT REPORT 0 9 1' April 2012 Number SFD B.U.I.L.D SFA Multi- Commercial Industrial Misc. Construction Permit of Single Family Single Family Single Family Family Includes all Permits Cost Fees Permits Dwelling Dwelling Attached Apartments Issuedfor Commercial Issued Program Begins Condominiums Use 11112012 April 2012 63 1 7 0 0 6 0 49 1,902,872.00 113,473.14 Calendar Year 134 10 11 0 0 25 0 88 5,237,672.00 271,045.83 2012 Fiscal Year 2012 565 48 11 0 0 129 0 377 19,114,390.00 680,830.55 April 2011 64 0 0 0 8 0 56 260,575.00 4,731.20 Calendar Year 130 6 0 0 26 0 98 1,454,918.00 74,598.38 2011 Fiscal Year 2011 570 33 6 0 115 0 416 12,243,165.00 467,359.54 April 2010 84 4 0 0 6 0 74 7,806,767.00 43,185.18 Calendar Year 176 16 0 0 31 0 129 12,509.270.00 151,739.00 2010 Fiscal Year 2010 593 62 6 0 131 0 394 37,121,168.00 808,410.48 April 2009 82 6 0 0 19 0 57 1,375,683.00 78,422.36 Calendar Year 158 10 0 0 61 0 87 6,291,897.00 179,445.22 2009 Fiscal Year 2009 725 84 38 0 221 0 382 64,456,236.00 1,597,827.08 Prepared by D Weinert At t 0 ' UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT REPORT o� fi o May 2012 <LE TYPES OF PERMITS Number SFD B.U.I.L.D. SFA Multi- Commercial Industrial Misc. Construction Permit of Single Family Single Family Single Family Family Includes all Permits Cost Fees Permits Detached Detached Attached Apartments Issued for Commercial Issued Program,begins Condominiums Use _ 1t1t2p12__ May 2012 68 5 4 0 0 10 0 49 2,224,394.00 100,984.03 Calendar Year 202 16 15 0 0 35 0 136 7,477,066.00 372,768.16 2012 Fiscal Year 2012 68 5 4 0 0 10 0 49 2,224,394.00 100,984.03 May 2011 91 6 0 0 18 0 67 5,063,416.00 67,225.82 Calendar Year 221 12 0 0 44 0 165 7,058,334.00 141,834.20 2011 Fiscal Year 2011 91 6 0 0 18 0 67 5,063,416.00 67,225.82 May 2010 70 3 6 0 8 0 53 1,749,142.00 92,515.28 Calendar Year 246 19 6 0 40 0 181 14,256,282.00 245,199.28 2010 Fiscal Year 2010 70 3 6 0 8 0 53 1,749,142.00 92,515.28 May 2009 68 3 0 0 9 0 56 7,441,009.00 101,346.18 Calendar Year 226 13 0 0 70 0 143 13,732,906.00 280,791.40 2009 Fiscal Year 2009 68 3 0 0 9 0 56 7,441.009.00 101,346.18 PABuilding Dept REPORTS\Building Permit Reports\Building Permit Reports...Fiscal 2010-201 I\Bldg Permit Report May 2012.doc `fit] CfTy Reviewed By: �� ' �► Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ II#2 EST. -�` _ ti 1836 Engineer ❑ �! City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number ! t3 Consultant ❑ ❑ EDC 2012-22 ALE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Building Inspection Report Summary(April &May 2012) Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: All inspections performed in the months of April &May 2012. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Informational Council Action Requested: none Submitted by: D. Weinert Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:34:23 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2012 TO 04/30/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 007-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110046 911 HAYDEN DR 127 04/10/2012 Commentsl: BASEMENT PR 008-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 04/10/2012 PWK 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20110323 4606 PLYMOUTH AVE 996 04/16/2012 Commentsl: REINSPECTION PR 012-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110404 1102 CORNELL LN 04/09/2012 PR 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/09/2012 PR 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20110424 2341 IROQUOIS LN 12 04/16/2012 PR 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/16/2012 PR 10:30 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110452 1262 TAUS CIR 120 04/24/2012 Commentsl: DECK PR 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20110455 1587 SIENNA DR 84 04/10/2012 PR 012-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 04/10/2012 PR 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/10/2012 PR 014-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/10/2012 PR 13:00 015-INS INSULATION 04/16/2012 PR 019-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110458 2341 EMERALD LN 104 04/30/2012 PR 020-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 04/30/2012 PWK 021-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 04/30/2012 Commentsl: DRIVEWAY APRON, SECURITY GUARANTEE FOR T Commentsl: EMP $799.50 PR 014-INS INSULATION 20110462 4626 PLYMOUTH AVE 993 04/03/2012 PR 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110479 1122 W VETERANS PKWY 1 04/20/2012 Commentsl: 5 ELEC SIGNS PWK AM 019-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 20110501 394 BERTRAM DR 1030 04/03/2012 PR 020-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/10/2012 PR 021-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 04/10/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 14:34:23 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2012 TO 04/30/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 003-FTG FOOTING 20110565 2848 MCLELLAN BLVD 455 04/24/2012 PR PM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20110573 312 WALTER ST 9 04/16/2012 PR 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/20/2012 PR 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/20/2012 PR 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/20/2012 PR 005-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120011 604 W VETERANS PKWY 04/17/2012 PR 08:30 002-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20120017 1228 N BRIDGE ST B4 04/09/2012 PR 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120018 378 BERTRAM DR 1034 04/23/2012 PR 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/23/2012 PR 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/23/2012 PR 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/23/2012 PR 013-INS INSULATION 04/25/2012 PR 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120019 2447 EMERALD LN 115 04/26/2012 PR 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/26/2012 PR 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/26/2012 PR 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/26/2012 PR PM 008-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 20120020 2338 EMERALD LN 36 04/12/2012 PR 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 04/24/2012 PR 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/24/2012 PR 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/24/2012 PR 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/24/2012 PR 013-INS INSULATION 04/27/2012 PR 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20120021 2431 EMERALD LN 113 04/02/2012 PR 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/03/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 14:34:23 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2012 TO 04/30/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/03/2012 PR 008-STP STOOP 04/03/2012 PR 009-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/02/2012 PR 14:30 002-BKF BACKFILL 20120024 182 BURNETT ST 1240 04/05/2012 PR 003-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 04/09/2012 PR 004-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/10/2012 PR 005-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/10/2012 PR 006-STP STOOP 04/10/2012 PR 007-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/11/2012 PR 14:30 001-FTG FOOTING 20120025 398 BERTRAM DR 1028 04/05/2012 PR 14:00 002-BKF BACKFILL 04/12/2012 PR PM 003-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/16/2012 PR PM 004-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/16/2012 PR PM 005-STP STOOP 04/16/2012 PR 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/16/2012 PR 003-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20120026 396 BERTRAM DR 1029 04/02/2012 PR 004-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/04/2012 PR 005-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/04/2012 PR 006-STP STOOP 04/04/2012 PR 007-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/02/2012 PR 13:00 008-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 04/12/2012 PR 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120028 2279 LAVENDER WAY 71 04/30/2012 PR 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/30/2012 PR 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/30/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 14:34:23 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2012 TO 04/30/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/30/2012 PR 08:30 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 20120030 1979 MEADOWLARK LN 118 04/13/2012 PR 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 04/24/2012 PR 008-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/24/2012 PR 009-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/24/2012 PR 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/24/2012 PR AM 011-INS INSULATION 04/30/2012 PR AM 001-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20120035 624 BLUESTEM DR 90 04/02/2012 PR AM 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 04/02/2012 PR AM 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/02/2012 PR AM 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/02/2012 PR PM 005-INS INSULATION 04/03/2012 PR 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20120036 1292 DEERPATH DR 227 04/25/2012 PR PM 005-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/26/2012 PR PM 006-STP STOOP 04/26/2012 PR 007-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 04/27/2012 PR PM 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 04/30/2012 PR 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/30/2012 PR 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/30/2012 PR 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/30/2012 PR AM 001-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20120037 1352 MARKETPLACE DR 04/02/2012 Commentsl: STACK TEST PR AM 002-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/16/2012 PR AM 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/16/2012 PR AM 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/16/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 14:34:23 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2012 TO 04/30/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 11:00 005-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/20/2012 PR AM 001-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 20120041 2761 ELDEN DR 263 04/16/2012 PR 13:30 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120042 4579 GARDINER AVE 1105 04/13/2012 PR 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120050 1223 MISTWOOD CT 156 04/10/2012 PR 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/10/2012 PR 003-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/10/2012 PR 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/10/2012 PR 09:00 005-INS INSULATION 04/12/2012 PR 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120051 3132 LAUREN DR 110 04/09/2012 PR 001-FTG FOOTING 20120052 2575 EMERALD IN 131 04/03/2012 PR PM 002-BKF BACKFILL 04/11/2012 PR PM 003-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 04/12/2012 PR PM 004-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 04/12/2012 PR 10:00 005-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/18/2012 PR 006-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/18/2012 PR 007-STP STOOP 04/18/2012 PR 008-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/18/2012 PR 09:00 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120056 1102 HAMPTON LN 260 04/20/2012 PR 09:00 003-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/20/2012 PR 15:30 001-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20120061 406 ELM ST 39 04/12/2012 PR 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120062 510 W KENDALL DR 7 04/04/2012 Commentsl: ROOF PR 10:00 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120063 101 CLAREMONT CT 33 04/17/2012 Commentsl: ABOVE GROUND POOL PR 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120066 422 JACKSON ST 6 04/11/2012 I DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 14:34:23 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2012 TO 04/30/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR _ 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/23/2012 Commentsl: FENCE PR AM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120068 103 E BEAVER ST 2 04/11/2012 PR AM 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/11/2012 PR AM 003-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/11/2012 PR AM 004-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/11/2012 PR PM 005-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/26/2012 Commentsl: ABOVE CEILING PR 006-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 04/26/2012 Commentsl: ABOVE CEILING /PLUMBING PR AM 007-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/27/2012 PR _ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120069 448 E BARBERRY CIR 135 04/03/2012 Commentsl: ROOF PR _ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120071 394 WINDHAM CIRCLE 78 04/11/2012 PR 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120072 205 BEAVER ST 04/03/2012 PR 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/03/2012 PR 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20120076 4542 GARDINER AVE 1133 04/10/2012 PR 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 04/25/2012 PR 11:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120078 1305 EVERGREEN LN 168 04/05/2012 PR 12:30 001-FTG FOOTING 20120079 109 E BEAVER ST 6 04/10/2012 PR 002-BKF BACKFILL 04/18/2012 PR 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120081 3174 PINEWOOD DR 34 04/05/2012 PR 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120082 211 LEISURE ST 04/26/2012 Commentsl: ROOF PR 11:00 001-FTG FOOTING 20120083 1554 CRIMSON LN 301 04/27/2012 PR _ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120085 4562 GARDINER AVE 1131 04/10/2012 Commentsl: PAVERS DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 14:34:23 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2012 TO 04/30/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120088 606 MILL ST 04/10/2012 Commentsl: ROOF PR 10:00 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120089 421 WINTERBERRY DR 107 04/12/2012 PR 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120090 2729 GOLDENROD DR 241 04/05/2012 PR 11:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120091 212 BURNETT ST 1231 04/04/2012 PR PM 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 04/05/2012 PR _ 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120092 811 PARKSIDE LN 200 04/05/2012 PR 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120093 352 POPLAR DR 96 04/09/2012 PR 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120096 129 COMMERCIAL DR #17 04/09/2012 PR 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/09/2012 PR 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20120097 461 OMAHA DR 1 04/25/2012 PR 10:00 001-FTG FOOTING 20120100 4612 PLYMOUTH AVE 995 04/20/2012 PR PM 002-BKF BACKFILL 04/26/2012 PR 14:30 001-FTG FOOTING 20120101 2383 LAVENDER WAY 90 04/17/2012 PR 002-BKF BACKFILL 04/20/2012 PR 003-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 04/23/2012 PR 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 04/23/2012 PR 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 04/27/2012 PR 006-STP STOOP 04/27/2012 PR 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 04/27/2012 PR 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 04/27/2012 PR 15:00 009-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 04/30/2012 PR PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20120102 4638 PLYMOUTH DR 990 04/25/2012 PR 15:00 002-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 04/30/2012 PR 10:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120103 4631 PLYMOUTH AVE 1021 04/18/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 14:34:23 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2012 TO 04/30/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 14:00 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120105 1505 CORAL DR 174 04/16/2012 PR 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120109 508 W DOLPH ST 04/26/2012 Commentsl: ROOF PR 14:00 001-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20120113 1145 GRACE DR 67 04/25/2012 PR 13:00 002-FTG FOOTING 04/27/2012 PR 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120114 504 FREEMONT ST 10 04/17/2012 Commentsl: DRIVEWAY PR 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120117 2361 EMERALD LN 108 04/30/2012 PR AM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120118 311 ILLINI DR 5 04/27/2012 Commentsl: DRIVEWAY PR 08:00 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120124 1301 DEERPATH DR 258 04/20/2012 PR 11:00 001-FTG FOOTING 20120125 1562 CRIMSON LN 201 04/27/2012 PR 001-FTG FOOTING 20120128 920 HAYDEN DR 52 04/26/2012 Commentsl: PERGOLA PR 08:45 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120129 475 KELLY AVE 112 04/25/2012 PR 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 04/25/2012 PR 003-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 04/25/2012 PR 08:45 AM 004-INS INSULATION 04/27/2012 PR 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20120133 2032 PRAIRIE ROSE LN 108 04/23/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 14:34:23 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2012 TO 04/30/2012 ww INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 4 AGP ABOVE-GROUND POOL 1 BIP BUILD INCENTIVE PROGRAM SFD 38 BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 19 CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 20 DCK DECK 8 DRV DRIVEWAY 2 ELE ELECTRICAL UPGRADE 1 ESN ELECTRIC SIGN 1 FNC FENCE 10 GAR GARAGE 1 MIS MISCELLANEOUS 2 PRG PERGOLA 1 PTO PATIO / PAVERS 5 ROF ROOFING 5 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 56 SHD SHED/ACCESSORY BUILDING 2 INSPECTION SUMMARY: BKF BACKFILL 6 BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 8 EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 2 EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 1 ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 3 ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER 7 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 19 FTG FOOTING 11 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 6 INS INSULATION 8 PHD POST HOLE - DECK 4 PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 8 PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 4 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 18 PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 8 PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 6 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 19 RFR ROUGH FRAMING 18 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 13 STP STOOP 7 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: PR PETER RATOS 173 PWK PUBLIC WORKS 3 STATUS SUMMARY: A PR 7 C PR 42 C PWK 1 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 14:34:23 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2012 TO 04/30/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I PR 120 T PR 4 T PWK 2 REPORT SUMMARY: 176 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4AOOOO.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR PM 020-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20100429 762 OMAHA DR 44 05/08/2012 PR 021-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 05/08/2012 PWK 022-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 05/08/2012 PR 001-BND POOL BONDING 20110350 344 TYLER CREEK CT 95 05/30/2012 PR 002-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/30/2012 Commentsl: INGROUND POOL PR AM 004-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110424 2341 IROQUOIS LN 12 05/14/2012 PWK 016-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20110455 1587 SIENNA DR 84 05/22/2012 PR 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 05/23/2012 PR 018-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 05/23/2012 PR 015-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110462 4626 PLYMOUTH AVE 993 05/14/2012 PR 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 05/14/2012 PWK 017-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 05/15/2012 PR 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20110464 4478 SARASOTA AVE 1040 05/17/2012 PR 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/17/2012 PR 013-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/17/2012 PR 014-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/17/2012 PR 015-INS INSULATION 05/21/2012 PR 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20110487 4474 SARASOTA AVE 1041 05/09/2012 PR 012-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 05/09/2012 PR 013-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/09/2012 PR 014-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/09/2012 PR 015-INS INSULATION 05/14/2012 PWK _ 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20110512 1103 REDWOOD DR 48 05/21/2012 Commentsl: REINSPECTION DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110525 2286 LAVENDER WAY 57 05/15/2012 PR 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 05/15/2012 PR 018-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 05/15/2012 PR 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110529 1755 MARKETVIEW DR 8 05/21/2012 PR AM 005-INS INSULATION 20110573 312 WALTER ST 9 05/11/2012 PR 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20110578 2262 EMERALD LN 47 05/31/2012 PR 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120012 116 W HYDRAULIC ST 05/15/2012 PR 12:00 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120017 1228 N BRIDGE ST B4 05/14/2012 PR 004-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 05/14/2012 BKF 005-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 05/14/2012 Commentsl: FIRE MARSHALL CALLED WITH FINAL APPROVAL PR 014-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 20120018 378 BERTRAM DR 1034 05/04/2012 PR 015-PWK PRIVATE WALKS 05/04/2012 PR 012-INS INSULATION 20120019 2447 EMERALD LN 115 05/01/2012 PWK 013-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 05/11/2012 PWK 014-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 20120020 2338 EMERALD LN 36 05/07/2012 PR 015-PWK PRIVATE WALKS 05/07/2012 PR 010-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120021 2431 EMERALD LN 113 05/11/2012 PR 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/11/2012 PR 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/11/2012 PR 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/11/2012 PR 014-INS INSULATION 05/16/2012 PWK 08:00 015-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 05/24/2012 PR 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120023 2276 LAVENDER WAY 58 05/02/2012 PR 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/02/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/02/2012 PR 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/02/2012 PR 013-INS INSULATION 05/07/2012 PWK 08:00 014-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 05/24/2012 PR 008-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20120024 182 BURNETT ST 1240 05/09/2012 PR 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 05/09/2012 PR 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/09/2012 PR 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/09/2012 PR 012-INS INSULATION 05/11/2012 PR 013-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 05/21/2012 PR 014-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 05/21/2012 PR 015-PWK PRIVATE WALKS 05/21/2012 PR 007-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120025 398 BERTRAM DR 1028 05/16/2012 PR 008-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/16/2012 PR 009-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/16/2012 PR 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/16/2012 PR 011-INS INSULATION 05/18/2012 PWK AM 012-PWK PRIVATE WALKS 05/31/2012 PWK 013-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 05/31/2012 PR 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120026 396 BERTRAM DR 1029 05/07/2012 PR O10-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/07/2012 PR 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/07/2012 PR 012-INS INSULATION 05/09/2012 PR 013-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 05/21/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 014-PWK PRIVATE WALKS 05/21/2012 PR 015-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 05/21/2012 PR 013-INS INSULATION 20120028 2279 LAVENDER WAY 71 05/03/2012 PWK 10:00 014-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 05/11/2012 PR AM 012-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 20120030 1979 MEADOWLARK LN 118 05/21/2012 PR AM 013-STP STOOP 05/21/2012 PR AM 014-PWK PRIVATE WALKS 05/25/2012 PWK 015-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 05/25/2012 PR AM 012-INS INSULATION 20120036 1292 DEERPATH DR 227 05/04/2012 PWK 08:00 013-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 05/22/2012 PR AM 006-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20120037 1352 MARKETPLACE DR 05/01/2012 PR 007-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/01/2012 PR 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 05/01/2012 PR 009-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/01/2012 PR AM 010-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 05/23/2012 PR AM 011-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 05/23/2012 PR AM 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120041 2761 ELDEN DR 263 05/16/2012 PR PM 011-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 20120052 2575 EMERALD LN 131 05/15/2012 Commentsl: SUMP PR 012-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 05/21/2012 PR 013-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/21/2012 PR 014-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/21/2012 PR 015-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/21/2012 PR 016-INS INSULATION 05/24/2012 PR 11:30 004-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120056 1102 HAMPTON LN 260 05/25/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 11:30 005-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 05/25/2012 PR AM 001-BND POOL BONDING 20120064 171 CLAREMONT CT 23 05/01/2012 PR 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120065 612 SUTTON ST 164 05/08/2012 PR AM 008-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 20120068 103 E BEAVER ST 2 05/21/2012 PR 003-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120076 4542 GARDINER AVE 1133 05/01/2012 Commentsl: REINSPECTION PR 004-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 05/24/2012 Commentsl: DECK PR 14:00 001-FTG FOOTING 20120077 2557 EMERALD LN 128 05/15/2012 PR PM 002-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 05/21/2012 PR PM 003-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 05/21/2012 PR 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 05/31/2012 PR AM 003-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20120079 109 E BEAVER ST 6 05/01/2012 PR 11:00 004-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 05/02/2012 PR AM 001-BND POOL BONDING 20120080 574 W BARBERRY CIR 62 05/18/2012 PR 002-BKF BACKFILL 20120083 1554 CRIMSON LN 301 05/02/2012 PR 003-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 05/04/2012 PR 11:00 004-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 05/14/2012 PR 005-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 05/14/2012 PR 006-STP STOOP 05/14/2012 PR 007-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 05/10/2012 PR PM 008-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 05/15/2012 Commentsl: SUMP PR AM 001-BND POOL BONDING 20120086 2387 IROQUOIS LN 7 05/21/2012 PR PM 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120096 129 COMMERCIAL DR #17 05/01/2012 PR AM 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120097 461 OMAHA DR 1 05/04/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR _ 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 05/22/2012 Commentsl: DECK PR 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120098 1592 CORAL DR 110 05/15/2012 PR PM 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120099 802 ADRIAN ST 05/23/2012 PR 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/23/2012 PR 003-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/23/2012 PR 003-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20120100 4612 PLYMOUTH AVE 995 05/02/2012 PR AM 004-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 05/02/2012 PR AM 005-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 05/02/2012 PR AM 006-STP STOOP 05/02/2012 PR 007-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/30/2012 PR 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 05/30/2012 PR 009-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/30/2012 PR 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/30/2012 PR PM 010-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 20120101 2383 LAVENDER WAY 90 05/04/2012 PR _ PM 011-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 05/15/2012 Commentsl: SUMP PR 012-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/25/2012 PR 013-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 05/25/2012 PR 014-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/25/2012 PR 015-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/25/2012 PR 016-INS INSULATION 05/30/2012 PR 003-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 20120102 4638 PLYMOUTH DR 990 05/02/2012 PR PM 004-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 05/07/2012 PR PM 005-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 05/07/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR PM 006-STP STOOP 05/03/2012 PR 003-BKF BACKFILL 20120113 1145 GRACE DR 67 05/11/2012 PR 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 05/23/2012 PR PM 005-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 05/29/2012 PR 002-BKF BACKFILL 20120125 1562 CRIMSON LN 201 05/02/2012 PR 003-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 05/04/2012 PR PM 004-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 05/04/2012 PR 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 05/10/2012 PR 11:00 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 05/14/2012 PR 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 05/14/2012 PR 008-STP STOOP 05/14/2012 PR PM 009-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 05/15/2012 Commentsl: SUMP PR AM 001-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20120126 1092 CARLY DR 30 05/03/2012 PR AM 002-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 05/03/2012 PR 11:30 003-FTG FOOTING 05/04/2012 PR AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 05/18/2012 PR AM 005-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 05/22/2012 PR 11:30 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120127 1807 COUNTRY HILLS DR 139 05/09/2012 PR 09:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120132 501 W MADISON ST 5&6 05/22/2012 PR 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20120133 2032 PRAIRIE ROSE LN 108 05/25/2012 PR 09:00 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20120136 1864 ASTER DR 115 05/30/2012 PR 13:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120137 205 W MAIN ST 6 05/25/2012 PR 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 05/30/2012 Commentsl: FENCE DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120138 356 PENSACOLA ST 1207 05/15/2012 PR 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120141 2387 IROQUOIS LN 7 05/22/2012 PR AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20120142 407 COLTON ST 05/04/2012 PR 002-BKF BACKFILL 05/23/2012 PR PM 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120143 420 WINTERBERRY DR 100 05/22/2012 PR 11:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120144 2567 EMERALD IN 130 05/17/2012 PR AM 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20120146 2328 EMERALD LN 38 05/02/2012 PR 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 05/11/2012 PR _ 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120148 803 MCHUGH RD 7 05/30/2012 Commentsl: SHED PR 14:00 001-FTG FOOTING 20120149 2451 EMERALD LN 116 05/15/2012 PR PM 002-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 05/21/2012 PR PM 003-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 05/21/2012 PR 004-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 05/25/2012 PR 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 05/31/2012 PR AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20120150 1570 CRIMSON LN 101 05/15/2012 PR PM 002-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 05/21/2012 PR PM 003-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 05/21/2012 PR AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 05/21/2012 PR 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 05/31/2012 PR 006-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 05/31/2012 PR 007-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 05/31/2012 PR 008-STP STOOP 05/31/2012 PR 001-FTG FOOTING 20120151 1638 SIENNA DR 56 05/14/2012 PR 08:30 002-BKF BACKFILL 05/18/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR PM 003-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 05/21/2012 PR PM 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 05/21/2012 PR 005-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 05/31/2012 PR 08:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120152 731 BLUESTEM DR 26 05/30/2012 PR AM 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120153 502 LIBERTY ST 16 05/24/2012 PR 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120154 204 W MAIN ST COY 05/17/2012 Commentsl: ROOF PR AM 001-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20120156 1322 MARKETPLACE DR 6 05/22/2012 PR 001-FTG FOOTING 20120157 2386 AUTUMN CREEK BLVD 261 05/14/2012 PR 08:30 002-BKF BACKFILL 05/17/2012 PR 003-ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 05/17/2012 PR 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 05/17/2012 PR PM 005-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 05/18/2012 PR PM 006-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 05/18/2012 PR PM 007-STP STOOP 05/18/2012 PR PM 008-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 05/29/2012 PR 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 05/29/2012 PR 010-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 05/29/2012 PR 011-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 05/29/2012 PR pm 012-INS INSULATION 05/30/2012 PR 15:00 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20120158 210 FAIRHAVEN DR 78 05/21/2012 PR 11:00 001-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20120165 1273 TAUS CIR 117 05/17/2012 PR 13:00 002-FTG FOOTING 05/18/2012 PR 003-BKF BACKFILL 05/30/2012 PR 004-BKF BACKFILL 05/31/2012 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PR 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120166 1206 SUNSET AVE 54 05/21/2012 Commentsl: ROOF PR 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20120168 2606 BURR ST 16 05/19/2012 PR AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120169 1702 COTTONWOOD CT 16 05/25/2012 Commentsl: POOL PR 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120170 3183 PINEWOOD DR 27 05/22/2012 PR 13:30 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20120172 414 W KENDALL DR 4 05/21/2012 PR 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120173 352 WESTWIND DR 9 05/15/2012 PR _ PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20120178 2551 EMERALD LN 127 05/24/2012 PR AM 001-PH POST HOLES / PILES 20120179 2128 MEADOWVIEW LN 19 05/30/2012 PR 001-FTG FOOTING 20120184 2441 EMERALD LN 114 05/24/2012 PR 001-FTG FOOTING 20120185 1494 CRIMSON LN 901 05/24/2012 i PR 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20120192 2472 FAIRFAX WAY 125 05/25/2012 PR 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20120195 844 CARLY COURT 05/24/2012 PR 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20120211 209 S BRIDGE ST 05/31/2012 Commentsl: CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 1 AGP ABOVE-GROUND POOL 4 BIP BUILD INCENTIVE PROGRAM SFD 58 BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 3 CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 2 CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 13 DCK DECK 12 FNC FENCE 8 IGP IN-GROUND POOL 3 MIS MISCELLANEOUS 2 PTO PATIO / PAVERS 6 REM REMODEL 5 ROF ROOFING 2 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 102 SHD SHED/ACCESSORY BUILDING 4 INSPECTION SUMMARY: BKF BACKFILL 10 BND POOL BONDING 4 BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 7 EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 5 EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 11 j ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 12 ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER 10 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 21 FTG FOOTING 11 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 7 INS INSULATION 14 PH POST HOLES / PILES 1 PHD POST HOLE - DECK 5 PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 8 PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 8 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 14 PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 11 PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 11 PWK PRIVATE WALKS 6 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 13 RFR ROUGH FRAMING 17 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 12 STP STOOP 7 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: BKF BRISTOL KENDALL FIRE DEPT 1 PR PETER RATOS 211 PWK PUBLIC WORKS 13 STATUS SUMMARY: A PR 1 DATE: 06/01/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 TIME: 10:41:49 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4AOOOO.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 05/01/2012 TO 05/31/2012 I INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ C BKF 1 C PR 35 C PWK 4 I PR 175 I PWK 9 REPORT SUMMARY: 225 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0 Legal ❑ II#3 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development EDC 2012-23 Police ALE ��' Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Monthly Property Maintenance Inspection Report Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: None - informational Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: PROPERTY MAINTENANCE VIOLATIONS UNITED CITY OF YORKVLLE Comp# DATE ADDRESS PARCEL WARD COMPLAINT ACTION TAKEN VIOLATION 2012- 5/1/2012 585 W Barberry Cir 05-05-130-007 1 Garbage left at street Removed 1 small bag of garbage no 05-002 5/3/2012 1005 S Main St 02-32-453-026 2 Appliances& metal garbage in drive Sent letter requesting removal by 5/10 pending 05-004 5/3/2012 904 Adrian St 02-32-476-002 1 IStinky Burning No evidence no 05-005 5/7/2012 Mill between Washington & Fox St 2 Debris No apparent violation 05-008 5/8/2012 633 White Oak Way 02-32-165-010 1 Boat in Driveway No apparent violation 05-011 105 Center St 02-20-476-024 4 Tree limb on gate 05-033 5/16/2012 406 Heustis St 02-33-304-005 2 Dead Tree 05-036 5/23/2012 2395 Iroquois Ln 02-20-125-005 3 Driveway, ladder on shed Spoke to compainant No 05-049 5/24/2012 510 W Madison 02-32-254-004 2 Dead tree limbs hanging Not a safety issue will continue to monitor 5/29/2012 102 W Fox 02-32-433-007 1 Unsafe sign Old Sign no apparent violation 05-055 513012012 268 Baltrusol Ct 05-09-202-008 1 Debris Garbage day standard debris 05-056 5/30/2012 9776 Sleepy Hollow 04-23-400-003 2 Debris Trash in evidence 8 workers removing debris 05-057 Property Maintenance Violations May 2012 MAY 2012 MOWING VIOLATIONS UNITED CITY OF YORKVLLE Comp# DATE ADDRESS PARCEL IWARD COMPLAINT VIOLATION 2012- 1 4/30/2012 Vacant lot Freemont& Liberty 02-33-126-021 2 3 acres of weeds Ltr.5-8-12,Cited 04-024 2 5/1/2012 1152 Kate Dr 02-28-433-013 2 Weeds,const debris left on lot CITATION 05-001 3 5/2/2012 952 Canyon Trail Ct 02-20-126-002 3 Weeds(complainant not clear) Insp& Ltr 5-8-12 Mowed 05-003 4 51412012 North of KMP south of KYR 3 Weeds(see map) Spoke to PM will be corrected 05-006 5 5/4/2012 2795 Cranston 02-14-457-008 4 Weeds Ltr.5-8-12 Posted 5/22 05-007 6 7 5/7/2012 705 S Main St 02-32-436-005 1 Weeds Repeat Complaint 10 day Itr 5-8-12 Mowed 04-011 8 5/7/2012 104 Beaver St 05-05-229-013 1 Weeds POSTED Cited 5/22 05-010 9 51712012 505 W Washington St 02-32-403-012 2 I Weeds(horse shoe pit in rear yard)overgrown POSTED Cited PW to mow 05-012 10 5/8/2012 Grande Reserve Brady&Shoeger 4 Weeds(Prop Mgr Pat Hughes 312-307-5051) Mowed 05-013 11 5/8/2012 122 Claremont Ct 105-09-159-007 1 lWeeds 4-1-5 Itr 5-8-12 Cited PW 12I 5/9/2012 285 Windham Circle 02-31-230-005 2 Weeds POSTED Mowed 04-017 13 r 5/9/2012 1001 Canyon Trail Ct. 02-20-126-028 3 Weeds POSTED Cited PW to mow 05-016 14 511012012 Vacant land country Hills east of Clover Ct. 1 X05-04-431-001 Weeds Will mow by 5/15/12 Mowed 15 5/10/2012 1142 Kate Dr 02-28-433-011 2 Weeds CITATION 05-018 16 5/10/2012 1132 Kate Dr 02-28-433-010 2 Weeds CITATION 05-019 17 5/10/2012 1092 Kate Dr 02-28-433-007 2 Weeds CITATION 05-020 18 5/10/2012 1093 Redwood Dr 02-28-433-004 Weeds CITATION 05-021 19 5/10/2012 Cell Tower behind 1411 S Bridge 1 Weeds Call Mowed 05-022 20 5/10/2012 Crooker, Brady,Tuscanyand M 4 Weeds Mowed 05-023 21 5/10/2012 905 S State St 02-32-476-007 3 Weeds Letter Cited PW to mow 05-024 22 5/11/2012 2357 Emerald Ln 02-22-277-002 4 Weeds No Violation 23 24 5/11/2012 1202 Evergreen Ln 02-30-109-001 3 Weeds POSTED Cited 05-026 25 5/15/2012 1103 Western Ln 02-20-127-001 3 Weeds POSTED Cited 05-029 26 5/15/2012 2302 High Ridge Ln 02-20-150-003 3 Weeds POSTED Cited 05-028 27 5/15/2012 165 Fountain View Dr 05-05-400-015 1 Weeds No apparent violation. 05-034 28 5/15/2012 1973 Praire Rose Ln 02-21-478-026 4 Weeds No Violation 05-030 29 5/15/2012 Vacant lots Crooker& Brady 4 Weeds Repeat Complaint Mowed 05-031 30 5/15/2012 Vacant land south of Hayden 02-22-300-002 4 Weeds Mowed 05-032 31 5/17/201211969 Meadowlark Ln 05-04-432-016 1 Weeds(already posted) ITalked to bank,will mow. 05-037 32 5/18/20121996 White Plains Ln 02-20-127-001 3 Weeds No Violation 05-038 Copy of Mowing Violation May 2012 *Will monitor and post if mowing does not begin next week(Week of 5-14-12) MAY 2012 MOWING VIOLATIONS UNITED CITY OF YORKVLLE 33 5/22/2012 491 Birchwood Dr 02-34-153-008 2 Weeds Posted 05-044 34 5/22/2012 501 Birchwood Dr 02-34-153-007 2 Weeds Posted 05-045 35 5/22/2012 511 Birchwood Dr 02-34-153-006 2 weeds Posted 05-046 36 5/22/2012 1309 Spring St 02-34-154-013 2 weeds Posted 05-047 37 5/22/2012 1313 Spring St 02-34-154-014 2 weeds Posted 05-048 38 5/22/2012 572 Birchwood 02-34-154-003 2 weeds MOWED 05-050 39 5/22/2012 551 Birchwood 02-34-153-004 2 weeds Posted 05-051 40 54 Lots In Windett Ridge weeds CITATION 41 11 lots in Heartland Circle weeds Posted 42 5/31/2012 7311 Route 47 05-09-151-001 1 lWeeds Posted 05-058 43 5/29/2012 354 Timbalier 02-04-411-008 4 Weeds Posted 5-30 05-053 44 5/29/2012 1973 Praire Rose Ln 02-21-478-026 4 weeds/berm Spoke to Westphal will mow 05-054 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Copy of Mowing Violation May 2012 *Will monitor and post if mowing does not begin next week(Week of 5-14-12) CIP Reviewed By: *:1 a► Legal El Agenda Item Number Finance II#4 EST. � -_ 1836 Engineer City Administrator 0 ��. % Human Resources El Tracking Number ,*�w © Community Development EDC 2012-24 ALE �V� Police Public Works Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Route 47 update Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: A status update on the Route 47 project. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N /A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/A Council Action Requested: Informational item Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid 1s36 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: June 7, 2012 C<wrMY Sad �LE ��' Subject: Route 47 update Summary An informational item on the Route 47 expansion project. Construction timeline and phasing At this time, a detailed construction timeline and phasing plan still has not been released by IDOT. ComEd, Comcast, and Nicor have been relocating utility lines for the past several months, and are nearing completion. We expect the first segment of Route 47 right-of-way to be cleared of all utilities by the end of this month, and expect storm sewer construction in July. Cost estimate update Bids were awarded to D Construction in early 2012, and total project estimates were below budget. However, the sections of the project that the City requested were over budget. Thankfully, we overbudgeted and our current budget estimates are very close to the actual costs. The timeline of cost estimates is as follows: 1) The first estimate for the City's share of Route 47 project costs was generated in 2010 by then-City Engineer Joe Wywrot and an IDOT employee. That estimate came in at $3.579 million. 2) As we got closer to signing the City-State agreement in 2011, IDOT revised the City's estimate downward to $2.631 million. This figure was memorialized in the approved City-State agreement. 3) Knowing the wide-spread between our original estimates and IDOT's revised estimated, we budgeted in the FY 12 budget for all costs to be paid over FY 12, 13 and 14 in the total amount of about $3.2 million. 4) In February 2012, IDOT's bids responses for the entire project were lower than they expected. 5) In April 2012, the City approved the FY 13 budget which paid for the Route 47 expansion project over a 10-year period,beginning in FY 13, in a total amount of $3.179 million. 6) In May 2012, the City and State was able to analyze the detailed bid(since awarded to D Construction) and determine the City's items were $3.375 million. a. All overages in the cost estimates came in the sewer and water construction sections. The good news is that the overages are contained within enterprise funds and are spread over a 10-year period. The bad news is that our local share is more than we budgeted. 7) In May 2012, City Engineer Brad Sanderson and Public Works Director Eric Dhuse reviewed the detailed construction plans and decided to remove certain components of the sewer and water projects, with a potential savings to the City of$100,000. All components recommended for removal by Mr. Sanderson and Mr. Dhuse are considered unnecessary to the overall water and sewer system, do not reflect a motive to simply save costs by cutting sections of the project, and will not result in the City needing to go back in the future to complete these components at a greater cost. 8) After the recommended sewer and water components are removed from the project, the total City share will be $3.275 million. This is $96,000 more than we budgeted over 10 years,but is an increase of only$9,600 per year. As stated in the above timeline, the new project cost should result in a$9,600 budget overage in FY 13 between the water and sewer funds. For the FY 14 budget process, we will update the figures accordingly. Recommendation No action is necessary by the City Council. This is an informational item. `� I3 fry Reviewed By: �� �•s► Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ II#5 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer City Administrator Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development j� �� EDC 2012-25 Police LE Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Glen Palmer Dam project Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: A status update on the Glen Palmer Dam project. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/A Council Action Requested: Informational item Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. -�` Yid 1s36 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -- � � CC: Date: June 7, 2012 C<wrMY Sad Subject: Glen Palmer Dam project Summary An update on the Glen Palmer Dam project. Background This item was last discussed at the May 24, 2011 City Council meeting. The presentation from that meeting is attached. At that meeting, the staff gave an overview of City maintenance responsibilities for the Glen Palmer Dam, which would begin when the State's construction was complete. Update The State's construction of the facility was completed this year with the installation of the pedestrian bridge. After the bridge was installed, City staff and State staff met several times to discuss remaining punchlist items on the project. The purpose of the punchlist was for the City to go through the project and request items to be fixed or repaired prior to our ultimate takeover. That punchlist and the IDNR's response to it is included in the May 7th letter from the IDNR, which is attached. The State's overall completion letter is also attached, and is dated May 8th Of particular note in the punchlist letter and the completion letter is the non-completion of several large components of the bypass channel. Notably, the stone riprap on the banks throughout the channel appears to have been non-compliant with construction specifications put forth by IDNR. For anyone that has been to the course, there are signs of visible erosion on the banks. The banks were designed with specifications to prevent erosion. So, the State and the contractor were negotiating for remedy, which has resulted in mutual litigation between the parties. We do know that the entire project was bonded, so the State does have considerable leverage and options to make sure the project is completed correctly. For our purposes, this ongoing discussion between the State and the contractor has resulted in the State retaining maintenance obligations over certain sections of the bypass—including some cracked concrete sidewalk and grading and seeding of grass areas along the bank. As stated in their memo, they would like us to still cut the grass and the weeds that are along the bank, but they acknowledge that ultimate responsibility has not been turned over to the City. They also state that they do expect these issues to be fixed at some point in the future, so they are hesitant to fix items like the sidewalk—which may be damaged during the repair efforts. As more information is given to us by the IDNR, we will share it from the City Council. I am not optimistic that repair efforts will begin in earnest this calendar year. Illinois Department of Natural Resources Pat Quinn,Governor One Natural Resources Way Springfield,Illinois 62702-1271 Marc Miller,Director http://dnr.state.il.us May 8, 2012 Mr. Bart Olson City Administrator, United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Dear Mr. Olson: The Glen Palmer Dam Improvements Project is now substantially completed. D Construction is expected to complete all remaining Phase 3 project work, including the installation of the Denil fish ladder debris boom by the end of this month. Effective immediately, the United City of Yorkville is now responsible for operation and maintenance of the dam and these improvements in accordance with Intergovernmental Agreement between the United City of Yorkville and the Department of Natural Resources (Contract 203), and the approved Operation and Maintenance Manual (O&M Manual). I have enclosed an updated copy of the O&M Manual for your reference. I have addressed the outstanding construction"punch list" items documented by the city's Public Works Department for the project's bypass and bridge in a separate letter to Mr. Eric Dhuse dated May 7, 2012. Planted Riprap As specified in the Intergovernmental Agreement, the Department retains all responsibility for the structural integrity of the project features to ensure that the project serves its intended purpose for the life of the project. The Stone Riprap (Special)portion of the project was designed to provide a 24"thick layer of Stone Riprap Class A5 mixed with soil and planted with a vegetative cover so that roots would become intertwined with the riprap and provide a more natural appearance. The intent of this cover is to provide a protective covering of Class A5 riprap at the finished design grade should the soil and vegetation unexpectedly eroded away. It is the Department's position that neither the material used in the Stone Riprap (Special)nor the installation of the Stone Riprap (Special) meet the requirements specified in the contract documents for Stone Riprap (Special), and therefore, must be replaced. The Department continues to pursue further actions to remedy the Stone Riprap (Special) situation. Operation As a state owned facility on a Public Body of Water, the Yorkville Glen D. Palmer Dam and appurtenant works (including the Margaret Kline Bypass Channel) is intended for public use and recreation. Accordingly, public use of the bypass channel shall not be restricted except as posted or when necessary for inspection, maintenance, or emergency conditions. Per our mutual agreement, the swing gates on the pedestrian bridge over the bypass channel have been removed from their hinges to allow full access to the abutment stair railings. The United City of Yorkville is responsible to close access to the pedestrian bridge and divider island when the United City of Yorkville deems river stages preclude the safe use and enjoyment of the island. As a Public Body of Water, the pool created by the Yorkville Glen D. Palmer Dam and appurtenant works shall be maintained at or above elevation 574.5 when flows exceed a base flow of 210 cfs unless emergency dewatering of the pool is necessary as part of the Emergency Action Plan for the dam. The bypass inlet stoplog structure is intended to be operated with a standard 20 foot wide bottom width opening. Temporary removal of the inlet stop logs by the city to temporarily increase flows into the bypass is allowed at the discretion of the city, provided flow can be maintained over the entire principal spillway of the dam at all times during the modified inlet condition. During low flow conditions (pool elevation 575.03 or less),the slide gate on the 5'x3' box culvert through the island south abutment wall must be fully opened to allow flow to pass from the bypass channel into the grouted riprap pool, located below the stepped spillway, to prevent adverse environmental impacts below the dam when low flows are no longer uniformly distributed across the crest of the spillway. The operation of the Denil fish ladder is intended to be year-round with limited closures (blocked flow) for maintenance needs. The elevation of the fishway is set by the river stage and therefore will not require routine adjustment of flow. The United City of Yorkville is responsible to place (reattached to their river anchors) 8 collar buoys and 3 floating signs in the Fox River by April 15th each year and remove the same 8 collar buoys and 3 floating signs (unattached from the river anchors) and store them by November 15th each year. The Department, through its Office of Water Resources Field Maintenance Crew, is willing to assist with placement and removal of these project navigation markers for the next 2 years or until the city no longer needs assistance, whichever comes first. Operation of the project includes "walk-around" inspections of the dam and appurtenant works during and after an unusual event such as heavy rainfall or an earthquake. Maintenance The Public Works and Parks and Recreation Departments are responsible for the operation and maintenance of the dam to ensure that the dam will serve the intended purpose. Maintenance will include, but not be limited to; keeping the area clear of all trash and debris, or any other matter that might tend to impede proper and free flow of water. All structures, including riffles, pools, trails, bridges and islands will be kept clean of any and all debris and will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. All dam signage will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. Grass covered areas will be mowed to a height of six inches or less at least twice each year. On areas that cannot be mowed, measures will be taken at least annually to maintain the designated landscape plantings and eliminate unwanted woody growth larger than one-half inch in diameter. All concrete and rock surfaces will be kept free of graffiti and unnecessary markings. All fencing and hand railing associated with the dam will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. Measures will also be taken as conditions require to correct any erosion problems associated with the dam. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is responsible for operation and maintenance of the stream gage recording equipment at the dam site. Inspections "Walk-around" inspections of the dam and appurtenant works are to be made by the city semi annually and during and after unusual events such as heavy rainfall or an earthquake. The Yorkville/Glen D. Palmer Dam is classified as a CLASS II, SIGNIFICANT HAZARD POTENTIAL dam. Class II dams are to be inspected in detail by an engineer every three years. This inspection will be conducted by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources (IDNR/OWR) or a qualified engineering consulting firm approved by IDNR/OWR and the United City of Yorkville. The inspection will provide a thorough evaluation of the condition of the dam and appurtenances. Please call Loren Wobig at 217-782-9130 if you have and questions. Sincerely, Arlan R. Juhl, P.E. Director, Office of Water Resources ARJ:LW:rc Enclosure. Illinois Department of Natural Resources Pat Quinn,Governor One Natural Resources Way Springfield,Illinois 62702-1271 Marc Miller,Director http://dnLstate.il.us May 7, 2012 Mr. Eric Dhuse Director of Public Works United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Dear Mr. Dhuse: Thank you for providing an April 20, 2012 "punch list" of outstanding construction items documented by the city for the Glen Palmer Dam Improvements Project's bypass and bridge. The Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources' (IDNR/OWR) positions on these items are provided in the order presented in your punch list. Dam/Bypass channel 1) Until the issue regarding the bank material is resolved, which includes the rock, soil, and seed establishment, the City should not be responsible for any maintenance of the banks. As specified in the Intergovernmental Agreement, the Department retains all responsibility for the structural integrity of the project features to ensure that the project serves its intended purpose for the life of the project. The Stone Riprap (Special)portion of the project was designed to provide a 24"thick layer of Stone Riprap Class A5 mixed with soil and planted with a vegetative cover so that roots would become intertwined wiih the riprap and provide a more natural appearance. The intent of this cover is to provide a protective covering of Class A5 riprap at the finished design grade should the soil and vegetation unexpectedly eroded away. It is the Department's position that neither the material used in the Stone Riprap (Special) nor the installation of the Stone Riprap (Special)meet the requirements specified in the contract documents for Stone Riprap (Special), and therefore, must be replaced. The Department continues to pursue further actions to remedy the Stone Riprap (Special) situation. Until such actions occur to rectify the Stone Riprap (Special) portion of the project site,please contact me regarding any immediate maintenance concerns related to this portion of the project. 2) There are many areas of cracked concrete that need to be replaced: a. 2 squares at the east end of the project on the northerly walk near the large sign b. 5 squares north of Geneva Kayak shop c. 3 squares near the base of the steps on the island d. 2 squares near the gate valve on the island As noted in the response to iteml, the Department intends to rectify the Stone Riprap (Special) portion of the project site. Such work could likely result in additional cracking of the concrete sidewalk areas noted. The Department intends to wait until the Stone Riprap (Special) remediation work is completed before repairing or replacing any damaged sidewalk areas on the project site. Based on our inspection of the cracked concrete squares noted, none of the cracks appear to present a tripping hazard at the site. The Department will continue to monitor these cracked areas to make sure a tripping hazard does not develop. 3) Remove and replace cracked patching material at the base of the steps on the island. There are new concrete patching products that will withstand the harsh conditions without cracking. Based on our inspection of the cracked patched concrete at the base of the steps on the island, the cracked patching does not appear to present any structural detriment to the concrete stairs and railing or any immediate public safety concern. The Department will continue to monitor this patched material at the base of the steps on the island for further spalling of the concrete and patch the area with products appropriate to the conditions present on the island when necessary. 4) Repair the anchor bolts on the bottom of the stairs on the island. One anchor bolt is sticking up in the air and is a hazard. None of the bolts are tightened evenly and it does not appear to be correct. The Department will address the noted anchor bolt problem at the bottom of the stairs on the island as soon as Department Field Services Staff are available. S) Remove all volunteer trees from the entire site. The Department will remove volunteer trees from the bypass site as soon as Department Field Services Staff are available. 6) The grass area between the two walks at the east end of the project needs to have the rocks removed, graded and seeded. The grass area between the two walks at the east end of the project is another Stone Riprap (Special) area for the project and will be handled as noted in the response to Item 1. Walk Bridge 1) There is a gap between the walk bridge and the concrete abutment that could create a hazard for a child. Please remedy. The Department will weld a steel plate cover, similar to the steel plate cover between the bridge deck and the south abutment, over the gap between the walk bridge and the concrete abutment. 2) There is a section of walk that was "patched" approximately 75 east of the walk bridge. Any square that has been patched needs to be removed and replaced entirely. Patching the walk is not acceptable. The Department intends to wait until the Stone Riprap (Special) remediation work is completed before repairing or replacing any damaged sidewalk areas on the project site. Landscapinz 1) All areas mentioned below need to be tilled, graded, seeded,fertilized and straw blanketed. a. Area from walk bridge steps to the first tree to the west b. Area east of walk bridge steps c. Electrical trench south of shelters d. Entire area east of the walk bridge to the parking lot of Geneva Kayak e. Small eroded area on the north side of the Geneva Kayak parking lot The Department notified D Construction on April 24th that the areas noted above need to be reseeded and stabilized before the end of May. The Department will use our own in house forces, currently working on the Blackberry Creek Dam Removal Project, to stabilize the small eroded area on the north side of the Geneva Kayak parking lot while the crew is in the vicinity. Please provide us with a plan set for the bypass channel and walk bridge. Plan sets for the bypass channel and walk bridge are enclosed for your reference. With the exception of the punch list items to be address by the Department noted in this letter, the United City of Yorkville must proceed with the normal operation and maintenance of the dam and improvements in accordance with Intergovernmental Agreement between the United City of Yorkville and the Department of Natural Resources (Contract 203), and the updated Operation and Maintenance Manual enclosed. Please call Loren Wobig of my staff at 217-782- 9130 if you have and questions. Sincerely, Z�a Arlan R. Juhl, P. . Director, Office of Water Resources ARJ:LW:rc cc; Bart Olson, City Administrator,United City of Yorkville Enclosures f t .mfr r AT Ij \ a0 4li. _ a Yorkville Glen Palmer Clons.2 dam - Marge One Whitewatep Cmine ORuler `�ryD CJpy 1llinois Department of &'�rr Natural Ken dall Co tin y, Jilin 01s Resources Operation and Maintenance Manual Yorkville / Glen Palmer Dam Fox River Class 2 Dam City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois August, 2005 (Updated April, 2012) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL YORKVILLE/GLEN PALMER DAM YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS Table of Contents SECTION 1: General Responsibilities..................................................................................1 SECTION2: Definitions.......................................................................................................3 SECTION 3: Information About the Dam............................................................................6 SECTION 4: Operation Activities ......................................................................................10 SECTION 5: Maintenance Activities..................................................................................10 SECTION6: Inspections.....................................................................................................19 APPENDIX A: INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT#203 APPENDIX B : ESTIMATED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS APPENDIC C: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST PLATES PLATE 1 DAM AND BYPASS CHANNEL CONFIGURATION INCLUDING DEWATERING BREACH LOCATION PLATE 2 GENERAL SPILLWAY CROSS SECTIONS PLATE 3 DENIL FISHWAY PLAN AND PROFILE PLATE 4 BYPASS PLAN COMPONENTS PLATES 5-8 BYPASS PLAN AND PROFILES PLATE 9 SIGNAGE LOCATION MAP PLATE 10 BUOY PLACEMENT MAP PLATE 11 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PLAN PLATE 12 LIGHTING PLAN PLATE 13 DEBRIS DEFLECTOR PLAN SECTION 1 GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES This operation and maintenance manual, (hereafter referred to as O&M manual), outlines objectives, proposed policies, responsibilities, and procedures for United City of Yorkville personnel responsible for the management of the Yorkville/Glen Palmer Dam. This document serves as a basis for the safe and economical operation and maintenance of the Glen D. Palmer Dam (dam) during both emergency and day-to-day conditions. As a Class 2 Dam under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department ofNatural Resources(Rivers,Lakes and Streams Act,(615 ILCS 5)Paragraph 23a),operation and maintenance of the dam is required. Part 3702.40 of the 17 Illinois Administrative Code, Chapter I entitled the "Construction and Maintenance of Dams" details that: "4)An applicant for a Class I or II dam shall submit an operational plan specifying the method and schedule for the operation of the dam and the routine operating procedures to keep the dam in good working order, including an emergency warning plan."and "5) As a condition of each permit, the dam owner shall submit a maintenance plan detailing the procedures and schedules to be followed to maintain the dam and its appurtenances in a reasonable state of repair." Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources As a dam owner, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources (IDNR/OWR)is responsible for the safety of the public and for maintaining the structures for both safety and economy. Through an Intergovernmental Agreement(Contract#203)between the city of Yorkville and IDNR/OWR, signed January 21, 2005, the city of Yorkville is responsible for operating and maintaining the dam and for accepting all liability associated with the operation of the dam. This agreement is included in Appendix A. Yorkville City Council The City Council will annually provide sufficient funding to safely maintain and operate the dam. The estimated annual funding requirement as of the date of this plan is $ Appendix B includes a detailed summary of operation and maintenance activities used to develop the cost estimates noted above. The City Council will also provide sufficient authority to personnel within city government to assure the performance of critical functions during emergencies as outlined in the Emergency Action Plan. 1 City of Yorkville, Public Works Department and Parks and Recreation Department On behalf of the city of Yorkville, the Public Works Department and Parks and Recreation Department are responsible for the operation and maintenance of the dam in accordance with the operation and maintenance manual,to ensure that the dam will serve the intended purpose. Maintenance will include,but not be limited to;keeping the area clear of all trash and debris, or any other matter that might tend to impede proper and free flow of water. All structures, including riffles, pools,trails, bridges and the divider island will be kept clean of any and all debris and will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. All dam signage will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. Grass covered areas will be mowed to a height of six inches or less at least twice each year. On areas that cannot be mowed, measures will be taken at least annually to maintain the designated landscape plantings and eliminate unwanted woody growth larger than one-half inch in diameter. The city of Yorkville will also keep all concrete and rock surfaces free of graffiti and unnecessary markings and maintain and repair all fencing and hand railing associated with the dam. Measures will also be taken as conditions require to correct any erosion problems associated with the dam and bypass channel. The US Geological Survey,Illinois Water Science Center(USGS)is responsible for operation and maintenance of the stream gage recording equipment at the dam site. City of Yorkville, Police Department The city of Yorkville Police Department will close any city roads impacted by,or potentially impacted by, an emergency at the dam. The city of Yorkville Police Department will secure the dam site to allow ESDA and other Emergency Action Plan (EAP) parties to assess the situation of the emergency at the dam and implement remedial measures at the dam, if necessary with out placing the public at further risk. Emergency Services and Disaster Agency Kendall County Emergency Services Disaster Agency (ESDA) The Director of Kendall County ESDA will be responsible for all decisions related to emergency actions in the EAP in consultation with the IDNR when possible ESDA will evaluate the reported situation at the dam and determine the nature of the emergency in consultation with city of Yorkville Public Works Department and IDNR when possible. ESDA will initiate the EAP if necessary, and initiate any remedial action if appropriate. 2 SECTION 2 DEFINITIONS Abutment-That part of the valley side or concrete walls against which the dam is constructed. Right and left abutments are those on respective sides of an observer when viewed looking downstream. Appurtenant Works-The structures or machinery auxiliary to dams which are built to operate and maintain dams; such as outlet works, spillways, gates, valves, channels, etc. Boil-A stream of water discharging from the ground surface downstream of the dam carrying with it a volume of soil which is distributed around the hole formed by the discharging water. Berm - A horizontal step or bench in the sloping profile of an embankment dam. Breach - A break, gap, or opening (failure) in a dam which releases impoundment water. Bypass Channel —the man-made pool and riffle sequence channels and appurtenant works passing through and below the southern end of the dam. Core - A zone of material of low permeability in an earthen dam. Dam - A barrier built for impounding or diverting the flow of water. Dike(Levee)-An embankment or structure built alongside a river to prevent high water from flooding bordering land. Divider Island—the man-made island separating the bypass channel from the main channel of the river located upstream and downstream of the south abutment wall of the dam. Drain,Layer or Blanket-A layer of pervious material in a dam to facilitate the drainage of the embankment including such items as a toe drain, a weep hole, and a chimney drain. Drawdown - The resultant lowering of water surface level due to the controlled release of water from the impoundment. Embankment- Fill material, usually earth or rock, placed with sloping sides. Earthen Dam - Any dam constructed of excavated natural materials. 3 Emergency Action Plan (EAP) - A predetermined plan of action to be taken to reduce the potential for property damage and loss of lives. Failure - An incident resulting in the uncontrolled release of water from a dam. Feature Boulders —boulders deliberately placed in certain areas of the bypass channel for a number of reasons including hydraulic controls and their adjustment,whitewater features such as waves and eddys,habitat, and appearance. Freeboard - The vertical distance between a stated water level and the top of a dam. Gate or Valve-In general, a device in which a leaf or member is moved across the waterway to control or stop the flow. Groin - The junction of the upstream or downstream face of the dam with the valley wall. Grouted Boulders—boulders placed in the stream bed with grout between them at the bottom of their j oints that are intended for flood and erosion control,diversion and river grade control, whitewater boating, and environmental purposes. Maintenance-The upkeep,involving labor and materials,necessary for efficient operation of dams and their appurtenant works. Operation-The administration,management,and performance needed to operate the dam and appurtenant works. Operation and Maintenance Inspection - Inspections conducted by the dam operator. These inspections are frequent visual "walk around"inspections of the dam surface and appurtenant works. Outlet-An opening through which water can freely discharge for a particular purpose from an impoundment. Overflow Entry Weir— Weir located on the upstream divider island that allows additional river flow into the challenge route. Phreatic Surface - The upper surface of saturation in an embankment. Piping-The progressive development of internal erosion by seepage,appearing downstream as a hole or seam, discharging water that contains soil particles. Planted Riprap -A layer of stone riprap mixed with topsoil and plantings. 4 Riprap - A layer of large stones, broken rock or precast blocks placed in a random fashion usually on the upstream slope of an embankment dam,on a reservoir shore,or on the sides of a channel as a protection against current, wave and ice action. Sill - Top of a concrete weir. The elevation at which water will just begin to flow over the weir. Silt/Sediment- Soil particles and debris in an impoundment. Slump/Slide Area - A portion of earth embankment which moves downslope, sometimes suddenly, often with cracks developing. Spillway System-A structure or structures over or through which flows are discharged.If the flow is controlled by gates, it is considered a controlled spillway. If the elevation of the spillway crest is the only control of the flows, it is considered an uncontrolled spillway. Emergency Spillway - A spillway designed to operate very infrequently, only during exceptionally large floods, usually constructed of materials expected to erode slowly. Principal Spillway - The main spillway which controls both normal and flood flows and is constructed of non-erodible materials. Auxiliary Spillway - A spillway which works in conjunction with the principal spillway to control flood flows and is constructed of non-erodible materials. Stepped Riprap (terraces)—riprap placed to create terraces or steps. Generally located in a 3 step formation just above the water level in key locations. Stilling Basin-A basin constructed to dissipate the energy of fast flowing water,such as from a spillway, and to protect the stream bed from erosion. Stop Logs—Adjustable concrete blocks placed in the bypass channel entry way. The blocks allow flexibility to adjust the opening to the channel. Toe of Embankment - The junction of the face of the dam with the ground surface in the floodplain upstream or downstream of the dam. Trash Rack - A structure of metal or concrete bars located in the waterway at an intake to prevent the entry of floating or submerged debris. Weep Drain—a perforated pipe to relieve pressure head. 5 SECTION -3 INFORMATION ABOUT THE DAM The Glen D. Palmer Dam is located on the Fox River approximately 35.9 miles upstream of the confluence with the Illinois River. The dam is in the city of Yorkville 940 ft upstream of the Illinois Route 47 Bridge. The drainage area tributary to the dam is 1804 square miles. SIZE CLASSIFICATION With a maximum height of 12.5 feet and a maximum storage capacity of approximately 867 acre-feet, the dam is in the small size category. HAZARD CLASSIFICATION The Yorkville/Glen D. Palmer Dam is classified as a CLASS II, SIGNIFICANT HAZARD POTENTIAL dam because of the moderate probability that, in the event of a dam failure, loss of life and/or property damage downstream of the dam would occur. Illinois Route 47 bridge and the Bristol/Yorkville Sanitary District water treatment facility are both located less than a mile downstream of the dam. PURPOSE OF DAM Originally the dam was constructed near the location of a historic mill race operation as part of a plan in late 1950's to provide commercial navigation on the Fox River through a system of locks and dams. Today the dam provides the only recreational pool of water in Kendall County for boating and fishing. Components of the dam include: 1. An original earthen embankment dam behind concrete abutments constructed by the State Division of Waterways in 1960-61. Top of embankment (behind north abutment) is 40 feet wide at elevation 582.0. The earthen embankment is protected with revetment mat on the north end of the dam on 3 horizontal to 1 vertical slope. 2. An original concrete ogee crest spillway dam constructed by the State Division of Waterways in 1960-61. Plates 1, 2 and 3 show the current configuration of dam including a 400 foot section of the crest at elevation 575.08 that has been modified to include 4 steps approximately F-2" high by 5'-8" wide. 6 3. Bypass channel approximately 1000 feet long by 120 feet wide including 7 rapids and pools in series. Channel includes two routes, a moderate route and a challenge route. 4. Divider island dam and new south dam abutment constructed with a structural concrete core to approximately elevation 576.0. At elevation 577.3, flow will overtop the upper half of the divider island and flow from the pool upstream of the dam into the bypass channel. A pedestrian path is located along the longitudinal centerline of the island. General fill material, riprap and planted riprap cover the concrete core of the upper portion of the divider island and compose the entire lower half of the divider island. 5. A Tx3' Box culvert(side chute)through the south abutment with a slide gate structure and trash rack on upstream (south) end of the box conveying water from the pool immediately downstream of the dam to the downstream end of the stepped spillway. 6. An access bridge from the south shore to the divider island over the bypass channel including stairs from the north bridge abutment (south dam abutment) to the island. 7. A Denil fish ladder structure located immediately near the north dam abutment with a trash rack at the upstream (east) end of the structure (see Plate 1 and 3). 8. A 3' - 11" wide by 12" deep notch in the crest of the dam located near the north abutment for low flow water distribution. This notch is intended to achieve a total north flow of 25cfs. This notch is below the overflow to the Whitewater Bypass Overflow Weir. 9. Further upstream from the divider island a low flow entry weir, with a top elevation of 574.95 (approximately 0.10 feet below the existing dam crest). allows flow into the bypass channel. This crest level is set at the intended 210cfs river level. Its purpose is to maximize flow to the Whitewater Bypass for fish passage and recreation purposes. The entry weir length replaces, in a sense, the dam crest length removed by the construction of the bypass channel. 10. The stoplog block inlet weir serves as the primary flow(and non-motor boat) inlet to the bypass channel. This inlet is the only component in the system with significant adjustability. Mechanical movement of the stoplog blocks allows inlet flows to be temporarily increased in the bypass channel or further blocked for channel maintenance purposes. 7 1I A US Geological Survey Illinois Water Science Center(USGS) gage is located on the north side of the south abutment wall,upstream of the pedestrian bridge abutment. This gage will be operated by the USGS to monitor dam pool, tailwater, and bypass channel (pool 4) stages on a continuous basis. Pertinent data for the existing dam with modifications, appurtenant works and reservoir is presented in Table 1. Table 1: Pertinent Data for Proposed Dam Drainage Area Square Miles 1804 Dam Type Earth Fill Elevation,Top of Dam (earthen) Feet-NGVD 582.0 Height above Streambed (earthen) Feet 13.0 Upstream Slope 3H:1V Downstream Slope 3H:1 V Length, Crest Feet 150(north) Top Width Feet 40 Type Modified Concrete Ogee Stair step Spillway Elevation, Top of Ogee Spillway Feet-NGVD 575.08 Height above Streambed(ogee) Feet 6 Upstream Slope Vertical Downstream Slope Steps 1'1.5"x 5' 7.5" (see Plate 2) Length, Crest Feet 410 Top Width Feet 2.5 Streambed Elevation (downstream) Feet-NGVD 569 Type Reinforced Concrete Elevation, Top of Divider Island Feet-NGVD 577.30 Height above Streambed (RCC) Feet Varies,4-6 Upstream Slope 4H:IV Downstream Slope 3H:1V Length, Crest Feet 227 Top Width Feet 5 Streambed Elevation (downstream) Feet-NGVD Varies, 567-569 8 Reservoir Storage at Normal Pool Acre-Ft 288 Normal Pool Elevation Feet-NGVD 575.08 Length Miles 2.1 Surface Area Acres 99 Storage at top of dam (582.0) Acre-Ft 867 Principal Spillway Type Stepped downstream of Ogee Dewatering Ogee Spillway, Denil Fish Ladder, Siphons, Bypass Channel, and if necessary Open Cut in Northern Earthen Embankment portion of the dam. Entrance Overflow Inlet Water Supply Weir Allows flow to enter challenge Route Elevation, Top of Overflow Feet-NGVD 574.95 Height above Streambed Feet 4-5 Length, Crest Feet 125 Top Width Feet 4 Streambed Elevation (downstream) Feet-NGVD Varies, 569-570 Stop Log Entry Elevation, Top of Overflow Feet-NGVD 572.9 Height above Streambed Feet 4-5 Length, Crest Feet 20 Top Width Feet 5 Streambed Elevation (downstream) Feet-NGVD Varies, 569-570 Flow Augmentation Pipe 5'x3' Concrete Box Culvert Through For Use During Low Flow South Abutment I Periods Note:NGVD=National Geodetic Vertical Datum, 1929 9 SECTION 4 OPERATION ACTIVITIES General operation of the bypass channel by the city of Yorkville will be conducted in accordance with the Intergovernmental Agreement (Contract#203)between the city of Yorkville and IDNR/OWR, signed January 21, 2005 and included in Appendix A. PUBLIC WATER As a state owned facility on a Public Body of Water, the Yorkville Glen D. Palmer Dam and appurtenant works, including the Marge Kline Whitewater Course (bypass channel) is intended for public use and recreation. Accordingly, public use of the bypass channel shall not be restricted except when necessary for inspection, maintenance, or emergency conditions. The United City of Yorkville is responsible to close access to the pedestrian bridge and divider island when the United City of Yorkville deems river stages preclude the safe use and enjoyment of the island. As a Public Body of Water, the pool created by the Yorkville Glen D. Palmer Dam and appurtenant works (including the bypass channel) shall be maintained at or above elevation 574.5 when flows exceed a base flow of 210 cfs unless emergency dewatering of the pool is necessary as part of the Emergency Action Plan for the dam. BYPASS INLET STOP LOG BLOCK STRUCTURE The bypass inlet stop log block structure is intended to be operated with a standard 20 foot wide bottom width opening. Temporary removal of the inlet stop logs by the city to temporarily increase flows into the bypass is allowed at the discretion of the city,provided flow can be maintained over the entire principal spillway of the dam at all times during the modified inlet condition. The purpose of the bypass inlet stop log block vault is to allow placement or removal of the blocks out of the main current of the waterway inlet. Each stop log block weighs approximately 6,000 pounds. When the Stoplog blocks are to be removed, set or adjusted, the recommended procedure includes: 1. Mobilize a track (not rubber tire) excavator. 10 �. Remove the cover to the placement vault and place on shore. 3. The bottom of the blocks has a large grove. The base sill has a matching large tongue which the block slides along. The excavator operator pulls or pushes the block. The height of the tongue, depth of the groove, and weight of the block will prevent the block from being pushed downstream when it is in the current. 4. If placing or moving blocks, inspect the vault and slide any blocks in the vault out into the river. Make sure the bottom of the vault is clear of debris by use of a square bladed hand shovel. Attach appropriate chains or lifting cable to the block to be placed. Lift the block and place into the vault. Remove the chains or cables and the operator will use the excavator bucket to push the block into the river. 5. As the blocks are placed, inspect and make sure they are tight to the abutment or adjoining block. 6. With the final block placed, check the dimension between the land side of the interior wall of the vault and the last block and adjust setting as appropriate to "normal" or"desired" flow setting. 7. For removing or adjusting the opening to a wider setting, use the procedure in reverse. 8. Replace the vault cover and cleanup. 9. Check for flow performance along the bypass and Denil Fish Ladder. 10. Demobilize LOW FLOW AUGMENTATION CULVERT AND SLIDE GATE During low flow conditions (pool elevation 575.03 or less), the slide gate on the 5'x3'box culvert through the island south abutment wall must be fully opened to allow flow to pass from the bypass channel into the grouted riprap pool, located below the stepped spillway,to prevent adverse environmental impacts below the dam when low flows are no longer uniformly distributed across the crest of the spillway. The gate on the 5'x3' box culvert must remain open until river elevations in the pool above the dam exceed elevation 575.1 (0.1 foot flow over the stepped spillway) and river flows are uniformly distributed across the stepped spillway with the gate open. . During low flow(210cfs or less)conditions,the flow will split between the Denil Fish Ladder, the Dam"Notch"on the North side of the dam,the Whitewater bypass channel,and the"Flow Augmentation Culvert" out of the bypass channel. The intended split at a total river flow of 11 210cfs is 25cfs to the North and 185cfs to the South bypass channel while maintaining a water level upstream of the dam that is near the historic pool level. The 25cfs to the North will be split between the Denil Fish Ladder and the Dam Notch. The 185cfs to the south through bypass channel will result in approximately 50cfs diverting to the "low flow augmentation culvert"to keep the river wet below the dam while 135cfs continues through the lower portion of the bypass. Recreational boating opportunities will be diminished in the bypass channel during this operation. DENIL FISH LADDER The operation of the Denil fish ladder is intended to be year-round with outages (i.e., flow blockage to fishway) occurring only for maintenance needs outlined below. The elevation of the fishway is set by the river stage and therefore will not require routine adjustment of flow. However, stop logs can be used to block flow to the fishway in order to perform any necessary maintenance or debris removal. Aluminum flow baffles are installed on surface mounted guides inside the fishway. The baffles are designed to dissipate energy and are required for normal operation. For maintenance and inspection, the baffles can be removed from the surface mounted guides. For temporary replacement of baffles. wooden replicas of the aluminum baffles can be fabricated while replacement baffles are secured. The Denil fish ladder structure includes a protective grating included at the surface of the structure. This grating reduces the amount of debris that enters the fishway when the structure is submerged in water and will also reduce the risk of injury for persons trespassing and climbing on the structure. The fishway is not designed with the appropriate safety measures for visitor but provides access for maintenance crews. Exclusion of unauthorized personnel on the proposed structure at all times is advisable. The structure also has a"trash rack" and floating debris deflector located at the fish exit (water entrances) to reduce debris loading of the structure. BUOYS The United City of Yorkville is responsible to place (reattached to their river anchors) 8 collar buoys and 3 floating signs in the Fox River by April 15th each year and remove the same 8 collar buoys and 3 floating signs (unattached from the river anchors) and store them by November 15th each year. EMERGENCY DEWATERING Dewatering the pool above the dam below elevation 574.5 feet will only be allowed when approved the Illinois Department of Natural Resources/Office of Water Resources (IDNR/OWR). Base flow for the Fox River at Yorkville is 210 cfs (7Q10 low flows). The dam (with bypass channel), will pass 210 cfs at elevation 575.03 (top of dam spillway 575.0). At least 50% of the pool volume exists at or above elevation 573.01,the mid-point elevation of the pool. 12 If emergency dewatering of the pool above the dam becomes necessary, two options exist for to dewater the run of river dam pool to elevation 573.01 while maintaining a continuous base flow of at least 210 cfs. These options include: I. A 54"-diameter temporary siphon, or combination of equivalent smaller temporary siphons, will dewater the pool to elevation 573.01. At this elevation a 54" siphon, or equivalent, is able to pass 212 cfs while the bypass channel and Denil fish ladder continue to pass an additional 20 cfs. In this case, no physical changes will be made to the final dam itself, or 2. If it becomes necessary to dewater the reservoir during emergency conditions when flows exceeded 212efs as noted above, additional emergency spillway capacity can be added to the dam,through in-situ material, behind (north of)the existing north dam abutment and Denil fish ladder. This potential future emergency spillway area is owned and controlled by IDNR/OWR. REVIEW OF EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN The emergency action plan should be reviewed annually to assure that all contacts,addresses, telephone numbers, etc. are current. Changes to the plan should be made as appropriate but only with the concurrence of the Kendall County Emergency Services and Disaster Agency and of the Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources. Copies of any revisions should also be forwarded to all personnel that have the plan. 13 SECTION 5 MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES Proper maintenance will prolong the life of the dam and protect against deterioration. Timely repairs are a must after problem areas have been identified. General maintenance of the dam by the city of Yorkville will be conducted in accordance with this O&M plan and the Intergovernmental Agreement(Contract#203)between the city of Yorkville and IDNR/OWR, signed January 21, 2005 and included in Appendix A. The maintenance activities specified in the following sections are minimum requirements. NOTE:NO alterations or repairs to structural elements should be made without the assistance of a qualified engineer and the concurrence of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources. Debris: Remove all trash, logs and other debris which may obstruct flow over the principal spillway, Denil fish ladder, bypass divider islands, bypass channels and the bypass channel bridge. All structures,including riffles,pools,trails,bridges and islands will be kept clean of any and all debris and will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. Concrete Block and Rip Rap: Replace or level blocks and rip rap as needed to provide adequate protection against erosion. Vegetation Control: A good grass cover on the park area south of the portage path should be maintained by seeding, fertilizing and mulching areas which are refilled,barren,or thinly vegetated. Seeding mixtures used for maintenance reseeding shall result in a cover compatible with adjacent cover. The seeding mixture used during the dam's construction was: Seed having the equivalent of a minimum of 80 percent pure,live seed. When the percentage of purity multiplied by the percentage germination gives a percentage of pure, live seed less than the 80 percent, the rate of seeding was increased proportionately. 14 Adjusted pounds per acre= Specified Pounds x 80 Actual Pure, Live Seed Percent Kentucky Blue Grass 60 pounds per acre Alta Fescue 40 pounds per acre Timothy 20 pounds per acre Perennial Rye Grass 20 pounds per acre Red Top 20 pounds per acre Total 160 pounds per acre A good plant cover on the bypass channel and upstream and downstream divider islands should be maintained by seeding,fertilizing and mulching areas which are refilled,barren,or thinly vegetated. Seeding mixtures used for maintenance reseeding shall result in a cover compatible with adjacent cover.The seeding mixture used at the time of the dam's construction was: The seed mix shall be Prairie Nursery Detention Basin Wet Prairie Mix Seed Mix. The seed mix will be made up of 10 lbs/acre of the following species: Seeding Class 413 Modified—Wetland Grass and Forb Mixture Wildflowers Nodding Pink Onion Bergamot Red Milkweed Yellow Coneflower New England Aster Black Eyed Susan Pale Indian Plantain Sweet Black Eyed Susan Wild Senna Brown Eyed Susan Canada Tick Trefoil Rosinweed Joe Pye Weed Cupplant Boneset Prairie Dock Dogtooth Daisy Ohio Goldenrod Ox Eye Sunflower Stiff Goldenrod Blue Flag Iris Blue Vervain Wild Iris Ironweed Prarie Blazingstar Culver's Root Dense Blazingstar Golden Alexanders Great Blue Lobelia Grasses, Sedges &Rushes Big Bluestem Bottlebrush Sedge Porcupine Sedge Lance Fruited Oval Sedge Awl Fruited Sedge 15 Fox Sedge Canada Wild Rye Virginia Wild Rye Switchgrass Dark Green Bulrush Indiangrass Prairie Cordgrass Annual Rye Seeded areas should be mowed to a height of 6 inches approximately three times during the first growing season. When weeds reach a height of 12-16 inches, the entire planting should be mowed back to 6 inches. Mowing at 6 inches will cut back taller weeds,while leaving the shorter prairie seedlings unharmed. Use a string trimmer or weed eater on small areas and on larger areas a flail mower. Flail mowers chop up the weeds as they are cut, instead of laying the cut weeds on top of the prairie seedlings. If a flail mower in not available, a rotary mower or sickle bar mower may be used. Be sure to mow before any weeds set seed,to prevent future weed infestation. Do not pull weeds in the first year, as this will disturb or destroy the developing prairie seedlings. At the end of the fall of the first growing season, leave the dead vegetation and stubble standing, to help insulate the seedlings and reduce winter frost heaving. During the spring of the second year, mow the standing residual vegetation to the ground in early spring, and rake off the cuttings. If biennial weeds such as Sweet Clover, Burdock, Wild Parsnip, etc. are a problem, mow again at approximately 12 inches when the majority of biennial weeds are in full flower. Expect this second mowing for controlling biennial weeds to occur around mid-June. Beginning in the spring of the third year burn for the first time. Burning in mid- spring helps set back non-native cool season weeds and grasses such as quackgrass, bluegrass, bromegrass, etc. Burning also encourages earlier soil warming in spring, which favors growth of the heat-loving warm season prairie plants. If burning is not possible mow as closely to the ground as possible, and then the mowed material raked off to expose the soil and encourage warming. Grassed areas such as the embankment,the emergency spillway, and areas beyond the embankment toes for a distance of at least 20 feet should be mowed at least twice annually and at any time the height of the grass exceeds 1 foot. All eroded areas should be filled and compacted,reseeded, fertilized and mulched to establish a thick erosion resistant cover. All trees and brush on the dam embankment should be removed to prevent development of a root system which could provide seepage paths. 16 All brush and trees should be removed to a distance of approximately 20 feet beyond both toes of the dam. Animal Damage: Rodent holes should be filled with compacted clayey dirt and reseeded. If rodents become a nuisance, an effective rodent control program as approved by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources District Wildlife Biologist should be implemented. Concrete: After consultation with IDNR/OWR, spalled and cracked areas on concrete structures should be patched to guard against any further deterioration of the structure. Concrete construction joints should be filled with suitable joint filler such as a bituminous sealant to protect against weathering. Drains: All drains and weep holes should be kept open and functional by cleaning them of silt and debris. Painting: All metal work, fencing, railing, etc. should be properly prepared and repainted as necessary to protect against rusting. Signs: All warning signs and staff gages should be maintained(repaired,painted,or replaced) as needed. Mechanical Equipment: The hoisting mechanism, stem and guides, wedges, nuts and bolts should be cleaned and lubricated at least two (2) times per year. (Refer to Appendix C for operation and maintenance of the slide gate.) The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is responsible for operation and maintenance of the stream gage recording equipment at the dam site. Maintenance of the Denil Fish Ladder (fishway) Obstruction of flow or the accumulation of debris in the Denil fishway is anticipated and will require removal to ensure proper function for efficient fish passage during the months of peak passage which include March, April and May. In addition to this period, movement to over wintering habitat may also take place during late October and November of each year. The fishway should be free of debris that would impede passage or disrupt normal water flow during these time periods each year. The variable conditions of the river will coincide with the variable maintenance needs for the fishway. In general,maintenance needs may arise to straighten or replace baffles,trash racks or grating, repair or patch spalling concrete and/or general debris/sediment removal. For sediment removal in the baffled portion of the fishway,the baffles can be gently raised up from the floor along the baffle guide slot during normal operation to flush accumulated sediment from under each baffle. Workers should start at the head end (fish exit in headwater) and flush baffles in series towards the entrance pool in the tail water. For the entrance and exit pools, it will be necessary to place stop logs at the entrance and exit of both pools to stop water flow to the 17 fishway. Once flow is stopped, city personnel can enter the fishway and manually scoop any accumulated debris from the fishway. Routine Maintenance (weekly to bi-weekly) -Activities include visual inspection to ensure flow to the fishway. Trash and associated debris should be removed to maintain channel design capacity. Additionally, removal of obstructions to flow or fish movement(e.g., downed trees, large debris, etc.) at the entrance and exit of fish ladder should also occur. Storm Maintenance—Activities include inspection of the fishway immediately following storm events to remove sediment, trash and associated debris common with increasing river stages. Similar to Routine Maintenance, removal of obstructions to flow at the entrance and exit of fish ladder should also occur. Annual Inspections—Activities include inspection of aluminum baffles, baffle guides and associated hardware to check for abnormal wear and inspection of water depths upstream of the fishway exit to detect a loss of volume in the fishway exit area of the river above the dam. Inspection of the trash rack at the fishway exit should also occur at this time. Bars of the trash rack should be straightened if necessary. Removal of accumulated debris in the fishway entrance pool should occur once per year unless storm maintenance or routine maintenance indicates an abnormally high level of accumulation or debris.In general,annual maintenance should occur during the lower flow summer months when fish passage is not expected to occur. Stop logs should be utilized to stop flow to the fishway and allow maintenance crews access to the fishway. 18 SECTION 6 INSPECTIONS The inspection program includes two types of dam inspections. The first is regularly conducted by the city of Yorkville and is referred to as an Operation and Maintenance(W alk- around)Inspection.The second type of inspection,referred to as the Engineering Inspection,is conducted by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, or a qualified engineering consulting firm approved by the city of Yorkville, (all engineering inspection reports must be signed and sealed by an Illinois Registered Professional Engineer). Operation and Maintenance (Walk-around) Inspection: "Walk-around" inspections of the dam and appurtenant works are to be made by the city of Yorkville. During these inspections, a list of ite�3 observed (see Inspection Items below)and items to be maintained should be recorded. Photos and illustrations are useful when documenting inspected conditions at the dam. Frequency: "Walk-around" inspections of the dam and appurtenant works are to be made semi annually and during and after unusual events such as heavy rainfall or an earthquake. Inspection Items: At a minimum,during each inspection the following items should be noted in particular: 1. Water Level - Water level of the pool (headwater), tail water and bypass channel should be recorded at the time of the inspection. Maximum reservoir levels as a result of heavy rainfall should be recorded. 2. Divider Island- Walk the crest, abutments, groins, side slopes, and island toes at the waterline of the dam concentrating on surface erosion,seepage, cracks. settlements, slumps, slides, and animal burrows. 3. Earth Embankment (behind the north abutment) - Walk the crest, abutments,groins, side slopes, downstream toe and upstream toe or at the waterline of the dam concentrating on surface erosion, seepage, cracks, settlements, slumps, slides, and animal burrows. These are described as follows: Surface Erosion-Removal of vegetative cover by water action or pedestrian or vehicle usage forming deep ruts or gullies. Seepage - The passage of water through and/or underneath the earth embankment abutment and natural ground line or at the contact between the embankment and outlet works can be indicated by cattails or other wet 19 environmental vegetation, erosion channelization, or slumping on the embankment face. Cracks - Deep cracks usually indicate the movement of the dam and/or the foundation and can be in either the longitudinal(along the length of the dam)or transverse (across the dam) directions. Cracking can be an indicator of the beginning of slumps. Shallow cracks may develop during the sununer when the surface soils of the embankment become severely dried and are usually of no concern in regard to the safety of the dam. Settlement - Settlement is indicated by depressions or low spots and can be signs of consolidation of the dam or foundation or the loss of material beneath the settlement area. Slumps/Slides-Slow or sudden movements of the earth embankment slope on either face toward the toe of the dam. If seepage indicates the presence of soil particles,or if deep cracks,settlement, slumps, or slides are noticed, a qualified engineer should be contacted immediately for consultation - see Emergency Action Plan. Animal Burrows - Animal burrows result in a loss of earth embankment material and can provide seepage paths for water through the embankment. Vegetation - Grass should be a thick vigorous growth to stabilize embankment soils and prevent erosion from occurring.Note the height of the grass; if greater than 1 foot,a mowing of the area should be scheduled before the next inspection.There should be NO trees on the earth embankment and NONE within a minimum of 20 feet of the embankment toes or concrete structures. 4. Stepped Spillway-Check for any debris or other obstructions trapped on the principal stepped spillway which may block or restrict the free flow of water. Check stepped spillway for the development of any rusty areas on the concrete, and seepage, cracking, breaking, or spalling of the concrete. 5. Trash Racks - Check to make sure that the trash racks are unobstructed, operating well, and allowing for the free flow of water. 6. Outlet Works-Check for any debris or other obstructions trapped on the sill of the bypass channel inlet which may block or restrict the free flow of water. Check stepped spillway, the 50 low flow outlet culvert in the south abutment wall and the abutment walls for the development of any rusty areas on the concrete,and seepage,cracking,breaking,or spalling of the concrete. Check to make sure weep holes in the abutments are clear and operating 20 properly. Check for any erosion occurring at the embankment/structure junction. 7. Concrete Block and Rip Rap-Check to make sure that the blocks and rip rap are remaining in a uniform position. Freeze/thaw action or flow over the blocks or rip rap may tend to lift or fracture them,thus requiring replacement or leveling to maintain the necessary level of protection.No trees or woody vegetation should be growing through the blocks or rip rap. 8. Gates - The gate and appurtenances controlling low flow through the 5'x3' box culvert in the south abutment wall should be checked to make sure it is in good operating condition. Thoroughly inspect the gate paying particular attention to the stem, stem guides, nuts and bolts. Note the number and location of missing nuts or bolts, if any, and the condition of the stem. The gate should be exercised at each inspection as a minimum and preferably four times a year. 9. Denil Fish Ladder-Activities include visual inspection to ensure flow to the fishway. Inspection of aluminum baffles, baffle guides and associated hardware to check for abnormal wear is necessary. Inspection of the trash rack and debris deflector at the fishway exit should also occur at this time. Removal of accumulated debris in the fishway entrance pool should occur once per year unless storm maintenance or routine maintenance indicates an abnormally high level of accumulation or debris. In general, annual maintenance should occur during the lower flow summer months when fish passage is not expected to occur. Stop logs should be utilized to stop flow to the fishway and allow maintenance crews access to the fishway. 10. Railings - Check for damage, accumulated debris, operation of gates and locks,and adequacy of locations(this may change with time as people access the area or development occurs in the area). 11. Stilling Basin- Check the floodplain downstream of the dam for a distance of at least 100 feet for signs of movement of stone in the stilling basin. Records: A log book of activities occurring at the dam is to be kept current by the City. The log book should be reviewed during the Engineering Inspection and may be helpful during budget preparations. This book should contain at least the following documentation: 1 Completed operation and maintenance inspection lists 2 Additional visual observations 3 A list of maintenance performed 4 A list of any unusual occurrences at the dam 21 5 1 A copy of the engineering inspection reports Engineering Inspection: The engineering inspection is to be conducted by the Illinois Department ofNatural Resources, Office of Water Resources(IDNR/OWR)or a qualified engineering consulting firm approved by IDNR/OWR and the city of Yorkville.The inspection will provide athorough evaluation of the condition of the dam and appurtenances. Frequency: The Yorkville/Glen Palmer Dam is classified as a CLASS II, SIGNIFICANT HAZARD POTENTIAL dam. Class II dams are to be inspected every three years. Inspection Items: The engineer will thoroughly inspect the items noted under Operation and Maintenance Inspection in addition to the following items: 1 Principal and Auxiliary Spillways—Check for signs of seepage,structural cracking or spalling of concrete,misalignment of pipe,joint separation or differential settlement; 2 A review of past inspections; 3 An analysis of all data and information gathered including that from an on-site inspection. Records:A Dam Inspection Report form shall be completed by the inspecting engineer and will be signed and sealed by an Illinois Registered Professional Engineer. This report will document problem areas and deficiencies;recommend remedial actions for problem areas; and establish time requirements for dealing with the problems. The original report will be retained in the city of Yorkville's Yorkville/Glen Palmer Dam file and a copy of the report will be submitted to the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources. 22 APPENDIX A: INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT#203 23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT between the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS and the STATE OF ILLINOIS/DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES forthe GLEN PALMER DAM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND USE OF STATE OWNED PROPERTY Contract No. 203 9-01-04 THIS AGREEMENT is made among the United City of Yorkville, a Municipal Corporation, located in Kendall County, Illinois, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY,"and the State of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources, hereinafter referred to as the "DEPARTMENT," WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY and the DEPARTMENT are legal entities, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, having among their powers the authority to contract with one another to perform such undertakings as described herein under the "Intergovernmental Cooperation Act," 5 ILCS 220/1 et. seq. (2002); and WHEREAS, the CITY requested the DEPARTMENT to investigate the Glen Palmer Dam site to diminish or remove the public safety concerns created by the existing spillway configuration which ultimately resulted in the development of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the CITY recognizes the dam as a integral part of the CITY's history and economy and recognizes the dam as a recreational destination for local citizens, tourists, and sportsmen alike; and WHEREAS, the CITY, through prior resolution 2001-7 approved by the CITY on February 28, 2001, strongly urged the DEPARTMENT to preserve the existing dam in the CITY while making such safety enhancements that will protect persons from harm and create an ecologically safe passageway for fish and water craft to move both upstream and downstream of the dam without harm to the environment; and WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has developed improvements for the state owned Glen Palmer Dam which consists of: modifying a portion of the dam spillway with a 4-step concrete spillway and fish ladder, modifying the remainder of the dam spillway with a divider island and whitewater bypass channel/fish passage along the south bank of the river, appurtenances, and any environmental mitigation hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT", and WHEREAS, based on a document entitled "Yorkville/Glen Palmer Dam Alternative Analysis and Preliminary Design -December 2003," prepared by Teng and Associates for the DEPARTMENT and filed with the Illinois General Assembly in summary form, it has been determined that while the DEPARTMENT prefers the ecologically beneficial removal of the dam, the PROJECT satisfies the state's objectives for safety, ecological improvements and recreational developments while minimizing land rights necessary to improve public safety, and that the DEPARTMENT should proceed to implement the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has jurisdiction over State property at the Yorkville Dam of the Fox River, located in Kendall County and known as Riverfront Bicentennial Park; and WHEREAS, the CITY currently operates Riverfront Bicentennial Park under Agreement Number 645A with the DEPARTMENT, dated April 25,1991 and revised January 15, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference, for open space, recreational purposes, and the operation of a 16-inch water line across state owned property, including the Fox River; and WHEREAS, the CITY recognizes the PROJECT as an integral part of their further development of the Riverfront Bicentennial Park in the CITY; and WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has approved participation in the PROJECT to the extent allowed by its statutory authority under the "Des Plaines and Illinois Rivers Act," 615 ILCS 60/3 (2002); and WHEREAS, the Illinois General Assembly has appropriated funds to the DEPARTMENT from the Capital Development Bond Fund under Public Act 93-0097, Article 1, Sections 160 and 175, that includes funds for this PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has determined that the execution of this AGREEMENT is not subject to the signature requirements of the "State Finance Act," 30 ILCS 105/9.02 (2002). WHEREAS, under penalties of perjury, the CITY certifies that is its correct Federal Taxpayer Identification Number and that the CITY is doing business as a government entity; and NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the benefits to be derived from the completion of the PROJECT, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to the following terms and conditions: A. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The recitals set forth are incorporated by reference and made a part hereof, the same constituting the factual basis for this transaction. 2. The PROJECT will be constructed by the DEPARTMENT in two stages, identified as STAGE 1 and STAGE 2 in this AGREEMENT. STAGE 1 will include that work necessary to modify the existing dam spillway with a four step spillway, fish ladder and to construct a temporary spillway in the vicinity of the future bypass channel. STAGE 2 will include that work necessary to remove the temporary spillway constructed in STAGE 1 and to construct a permanent divider island and bypass channel/fish passage along the south bank of the river including any landscaping and appurtenances necessary to complete the PROJECT. 3. STAGE 2 of the PROJECT will proceed based on the availability of funds, accepted design plans, permits and land rights necessary to complete the stage. In the event the CITY wishes to proceed with implementation of STAGE 2 of the PROJECT without DEPARTMENT funding, the DEPARTMENT agrees to cooperate in the exchange of existing PROJECT documents with the CITY to facilitate the CITY's efforts. 2 4. The 2003 estimated cost of the two phased PROJECT is $6,800,000. The DEPARTMENT's funding obligation will cease immediately without penalty or further payment being required if in any fiscal year the Illinois General Assembly fails to appropriate or otherwise make available sufficient funds for the PROJECT. 5. The DEPARTMENT will not approve the award of a construction contract for STAGE 1 of the PROJECT until the CITY has adopted and furnished to the DEPARTMENT a proper resolution providing that sufficient CITY funding will be set aside to adequately operate and maintain the PROJECT as defined herein. 6. The previous Agreement Number 645A entered into on April 25, 1991 and revised January 15, 1999 between the CITY and the DEPARTMENT is hereby declared null and void and is hereby replaced in total with the terms of this new AGREEMENT between the parties. 7. All provisions of this agreement will be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 8. This agreement may be modified, assigned, supplemented, amended or terminated by mutual agreement, in writing, by the parties hereto. B. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1. The DEPARTMENT will prepare or cause to be prepared, the final design plans, specifications, operation and maintenance manual, and contract documents; advertise for bids; make the contract award; supervise the construction (resident engineering); and pay for all the construction costs associated with the PROJECT. The CITY will pay for all design and construction costs associated with any enhancements added to the PROJECT at the request of the CITY. The PROJECT may be constructed in phases as determined by the DEPARTMENT. 2. The DEPARTMENT will designate on the plans all designated boundaries of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, hereinafter referred to as "PROPERTY RIGHTS," required for the construction, environmental mitigation, operation and maintenance of the PROJECT. The DEPARTMENT will also designate, on the plans or in writing prior to the CITY commencing acquisition, the minimum title, right or interest required in each parcel of land to ensure the proper construction and future integrity of the PROJECT. 3. The DEPARTMENT will assume all responsibility for the structural repair and/or rehabilitation of the PROJECT after construction completion to ensure that it will serve the intended purpose for the life of the PROJECT. Any necessary work concerning concrete PROJECT features and any other PROJECT features related to the structural integrity of the PROJECT will be the responsibility of the DEPARTMENT. 4. The DEPARTMENT hereby grants to the CITY the right to enter upon any property rights held by the DEPARTMENT necessary for operation, maintenance inspection, and maintenance of the PROJECT as defined herein. 5. The DEPARTMENT will be responsible for obtaining all federal and state permits required to construct, operate, and maintain the PROJECT. All permits will be applied for in the DEPARTMENT's name. The CITY will be responsible for obtaining any local permits required 3 for the PROJECT. The DEPARTMENT will be responsible for all PROJECT inspections and reports associated with the issuance of a state Dam Safety permit. 6. The DEPARTMENT will make periodic inspections subsequent to the completion of the PROJECT to ensure that adequate maintenance is being performed on the PROJECT. Should the DEPARTMENT determine that a maintenance problem exists, a joint inspection will be scheduled and made by the CITY and the DEPARTMENT. Failure of the CITY to properly maintain the PROJECT as defined herein and as indicated by a written report of such inspection, will permit the DEPARTMENT, upon thirty (30) days written notice and continued failure of the CITY to perform the necessary maintenance work, to enter upon any of the PROJECT property rights and perform such maintenance work. In this instance, the CITY will reimburse the DEPARTMENT for any and all costs that may be incurred by the DEPARTMENT in connection therewith. C. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 1. The CITY will review and comment in writing to the DEPARTMENT on the final design plans and specifications and on the operation and maintenance manual for the PROJECT prior to the DEPARTMENT advertising for construction bids. 2. The CITY, without cost to the DEPARTMENT, will acquire and convey to the DEPARTMENT, title to all PROPERTY RIGHTS, not currently held by the DEPARTMENT required for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the PROJECT. All expenses associated with PROPERTY RIGHTS acquisition including title commitments, attorney fees, appraisal costs, plat preparation, recording costs and any other incidental expenses will be borne by the CITY. Prior to the DEPARTMENT advertising for bids, the CITY will furnish to the DEPARTMENT copies of the conveyance documents on all PROPERTY RIGHTS acquired for the construction, operation and maintenance of the PROJECT for review and approval by the DEPARTMENT. 3. The CITY, without cost to the DEPARTMENT, will acquire and convey to the DEPARTMENT, PROPERTY RIGHTS for any environmental mitigation required as a result of the construction of the PROJECT. All expenses associated with PROPERTY RIGHTS acquisition including title commitments, attorney fees, appraisal costs, plat preparation, recording costs and any other incidental expenses will be borne by the CITY. Prior to the DEPARTMENT advertising for bids, the CITY will furnish to the DEPARTMENT copies of the conveyance documents on all PROPERTY RIGHTS acquired for the mitigation of the PROJECT, if necessary, for review and approval by the DEPARTMENT. 4. The CITY hereby grants to the DEPARTMENT the right to enter upon any PROPERTY RIGHTS held by the CITY necessary for construction, construction inspection, operation, maintenance, maintenance inspection and in the event the provisions of Item B-6 herein are invoked by the DEPARTMENT for failure of the CITY to operate and maintain the PROJECT. CITY will permit the use of any CITY-owned streets or alleys by the DEPARTMENT or its assigns as necessary to construct, inspect, operate and maintain the PROJECT. 5. The CITY, without cost to the DEPARTMENT, will assume responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the PROJECT in accordance with the operation and maintenance manual, to ensure that the PROJECT will serve the intended purpose. Maintenance will include, but not be limited to, keeping the area clear of all trash and debris, or any other matter that might tend to impede proper and free flow of water. All structures, including riffles, pools, trails, bridges and the divider island will be kept clean of any and all debris and will be maintained in a 4 satisfactory condition. All PROJECT signage will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. Grass covered areas will be mowed to a height of six inches or less at least twice each year. On areas that cannot be mowed, measures will be taken at least annually to maintain the designated landscape plantings and eliminate unwanted woody growth larger than one-half inch in diameter. The CITY will keep all concrete and rock surfaces free of graffiti and unnecessary markings and maintain and repair all fencing and handrailing associated with the PROJECT. Measures will also be taken as conditions require to correct any erosion problems associated with the PROJECT. 6. The CITY will be responsible for expeditiously notifying the DEPARTMENT of any necessary PROJECT repair or rehabilitation conditions that exist related to substantial erosion or structural integrity of the PROJECT. 7. The CITY will be responsible.for the operation and maintenance of all safety lighting, signage, water control gates, and buoy placement associated with the operation of the PROJECT. 8. The CITY, without cost to the DEPARTMENT, will be responsible for obtaining and providing the DEPARTMENT with copies of all local permits required for the construction of the PROJECT. The CITY will be responsible to abide by all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations during operation and maintenance of the PROJECT, and to satisfy all state environmental laws, regulations, and executive orders that apply because of state funds being used on the PROJECT. 9. The CITY, without cost to the DEPARTMENT, will be responsible for all utility alterations or relocations and for all fence removal and/or replacement required as a result of the PROJECT construction, including any utility and fence related work shown on the plans. Utilities include, but are not limited to, electrical, cable television, and communication lines and oil, gas, sewer, and water pipelines. 10. The CITY will maintain eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. The CITY will continue to adopt and enforce required ordinances satisfactory to the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the DEPARTMENT, relative to the regulation of development in floodplains under the jurisdiction and control of the CITY. 11. The CITY will hold and save the DEPARTMENT and any of its duly appointed agents and employees harmless against any loss, damage, cause of action, fine or judgment, including all costs connected therewith, such as attorney and witness fees, filing fees and any other expenses incidentsll thereto, that may be incurred by reason of personal injury, death, property damage, flood damage and any and all other claims or suits of whatsoever nature that might arise or result from or as a consequence of the design, location, construction, operation and maintenance of the PROJECT. The CITY will not be responsible to hold the DEPARTMENT harmless against any loss, damages, costs or expenses arising out of negligent acts or omissions by the DEPARTMENT or its agents or employees. D. TERMS OF LAND USE 1. PREMISES: The lands covered by this Agreement shall include: (1) three tracts, comprising the Yorkville Dam and the abutting properties on the North and South banks of the Fox River in Section 33, Township 37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian, known as TRACT A (north abutment area), TRACT B (south abutment area), and TRACT C (all The DEPARTMENT property situated between said TRACTS A and B and bounded by the extended 5 East and West boundaries thereof), (2) all PROPERTY RIGHTS acquired by the CITY in the name of the DEPARTMENT required for the construction, operation and maintenance of the PROJECT, and (3) all improvements of these lands, including the PROJECT (all hereinafter the "PREMISES"). 2. USE OF PREMISES: The DEPARTMENT grants use of the PREMISES to the CITY, at no cost to the CITY, in consideration for the CITY's responsibilities defined herein. CITY hereby agrees to use the PREMISES for open space and recreational purposes at no charge to the public and for the existing 16-inch water line and other appurtenant utilities only, in accordance with plans, specifications and operations and maintenance manual approved by both parties. The PREMISES shall not be used for the burning of refuse, deposition of debris or other material, or for any unsanitary or unhealthful purposes by the CITY in the use or occupancy of the PREMISES. Any other uses of the PREMISES, and all plans in connection herewith, shall be subiect to the prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. An unauthorized or impermissible use of the PREMISES shall be deemed to be a material-breach of this Agreement. 3. ALTERATIONS: The CITY shall in no way alter or modify any existing structure(s) located on the PREMISES, nor shall the CITY modify the land within the PREMISES, without the prior express written consent of the DEPARTMENT. If the CITY wishes to make any such alterations and/or modifications, the CITY shall first contact the DEPARTMENT's Division of Planning to ensure compliance with applicable statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, consultation requirements of the Illinois Endangered Species Protection Act, 520 ILCS 10/11, and the consultation, mitigation and compensation provisions of the Interagency Wetland Policy Act of 1989, 20 ILCS 830/1-1 et seq., and with the State Agency Historic Resources Protection Act. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to mean that the DEPARTMENT shall be responsible for compliance with all applicable State or Federal statutes and regulations; that responsibility shall remain with the CITY. 4. MAINTENANCE: In consideration for the CITY's use of the PREMISES as defined in articles D-1 and D-2, the CITY agrees to perform all maintenance of the PREMISES, including litter control and vegetation management and all PROJECT maintenance as defined in Articles C-5, C-6, and C-7 of this Agreement. 5. OBSTRUCTION OF PREMISES: CITY shall do nothing that might interfere with the ability of the DEPARTMENT to inspect, maintain or improve the PREMISES or any portion thereof, including specifically but without limitation activities of the DEPARTMENT related to the operation of the dam and associated PROJECT. The CITY shall not, in any manner, obstruct the programs of the DEPARTMENT. It is understood and agreed that the DEPARTMENT reserves the right to require the CITY to remove, relocate or modify any structures, improvements or facilities upon, under or across the PREMISES, at the CITY's sole expense, if the DEPARTMENT determines, in its sole discretion, that such actions are appropriate and necessary to preserve the integrity, character, function or use of the PREMISES. 6. RELEASE OF DAMAGES: The CITY will further hold and save the DEPARTMENT and any of its duly appointed agents and employees harmless against any loss, damage, cause of action, fine or judgment, including all costs connected therewith, such as attorney and witness fees, filing fees and any other expenses incidental thereto, that may be incurred by reason of personal injury, death, property damage, flood damage and any and all other claims or suits of whatsoever nature that might arise or result from or as a consequence of the use, operation and maintenance of the PREMISES. The CITY will not be responsible to hold the DEPARTMENT harmless against any loss, damages, costs or expenses arising out of negligent acts or omissions by the DEPARTMENT or its agents or employees. 6 7. LAWS AND REGULATIONS: The DEPARTMENT and the CITY shall comply with all applicable provisions of State and Federal constitutions, laws, regulations, orders and decrees, including but not limited to those pertaining to unlawful discrimination and equal employment opportunity, including without limitation the Illinois Human Rights Act, the Public Works Employment Discrimination Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Article VI of the regulations of the Illinois Department of Human Nights, which are incorporated herein by reference, and all environmental and cultural heritage requirements. 8. NOTIFICATIONS- All official notices pertaining to this Agreement, excluding routine management communications but including, without limitation, communications pertaining to amendments or termination, shall be effective only if directed to the respective parties as follows: for The DEPARTMENT: for CITY: Department of Natural Resources Mayor, City of Yorkville Concession and Lease Management 800 Game Farm Road One Natural Resources Way Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271 (telephone 217-782-0179) (telephone 630-553-4372) or to such other points of contact as may be designated in writing from time to time by authorized representatives of the parties. All routine communications relating to management and operation of the PREMISES shall be directed as follows: Department of Natural Resources Yorkville City Engineer Office of Water Resources 610 Tower Lane One Natural Resources Way Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271 (telephone 217-782-0900) (telephone 630-553-4350) 9. INSPECTION AND REPAIRS: The DEPARTMENT makes no representations, warranties (expressed or implied) or assurances with respect to the condition of any improvements situated on the PREMISES or the PREMISES themselves. The CITY accepts the PREMISES and all improvements thereon "as is" in their present condition, and all future PROJECT improvements as designed, approved and constructed on the PREMISES. It is further understood and agreed that the CITY has sufficiently inspected the PREMISES, prior to the execution of this Agreement, made an independent assessment of the environmental and other conditions of the PREMISES, and accepts the same in its present condition. Any environmental claims which may arise from the CITY's use shall be the sole responsibility of the CITY, who agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the DEPARTMENT thereon. 10. RESERVED RIGHTS: This Agreement is nonexclusive, and the DEPARTMENT reserves the right of ingress, egress and usage of the PREMISES, and the right to grant leases, permits, or rights-of-way in and to the PREMISES to the extent that they are not incompatible with the uses authorized herein. 7 11. PUBLIC SAi=ETY: Should it be determined by the DEPARTMENT that a particular use of the PREMISES by the CITY is, or will be, hazardous to the public or the property, the CITY , upon written notice by the DEPARTMENT, shall install safety devices or make modifications at the CITY's sole expense to render the PREMISES safe for, and compatible with, public use. In the event the CITY fails to install such safety devices or make required modifications within thirty (30) days, or, if such modifications cannot be completed within said time frame, the CITY fails to begin working expeditiously to render the PREMISES safe for the public, the DEPARTMENT may install such safety devices or make such modifications at the CITY 's expense, and may declare the CITY to be in breach of this Agreement. 12. ENVIRONMENTAL: The CITY, except as otherwise herein provided, shall not alter or impede water flowage, apply chemicals, or disturb the terrain in any manner within the PREMISES without prior approval of the DEPARTMENT. 13. TERMINATION: The DEPARTMENT shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon giving the CITY ninety (90) days'written notice. The CITY agrees to surrender and restore the PREMISES, and remove all personal property therefrom, prior to the expiration of said notification period. If this Agreement is terminated under this provision, the CITY shall not be liable for CITY responsibilities defined in this Agreement beyond the date of vacating the PREMISES. It is further understood and agreed that the DEPARTMENT may terminate this Agreement if the CITY is in default or in breach of any of the terms of the Agreement, or in the event of the CITY's bankruptcy or receivership. In such an event, the DEPARTMENT shall give the CITY a written notification of such breach or default, and the CITY shall have thirty (30) days to cure the same. If the CITY fails to cure or remedy the breach or default within said period of time, the DEPARTMENT shall have the right to declare this Agreement to be terminated. Upon such an occurrence, the CITY shall surrender the PREMISES to the DEPARTMENT subject to the provisions of Article D-14. Likewise, the CITY, with 90 days written notice, may terminate this Agreement if the DEPARTMENT is in breach of any of the terms of the Agreement. Upon such an occurrence, the CITY shall surrender the PREMISES to the DEPARTMENT subject to the provisions of Article D-14. 8 14. VACATING THE PREMISES: The CITY, immediately upon Agreement Termination, shall vacate the PREMISES and remove all property to which the CITY holds proper title, except that the CITY shall not remove any property that is permanently attached to the PREMISES regardless of whether the CITY holds proper title except as authorized in writing by the DEPARTMENT. Should the CITY fail to remove or dispose of the CITY's property, the DEPARTMENT may consider such property abandoned and may claim proper title to such property or dispose of same at the CITY's expense. In addition, at the termination of this Agreement, the CITY shall quit and surrender the PREMISES, including real property improvements, in a good state of repair, save ordinary wear and tear. The DEPARTMENT reserves the right to require the-CITY to make such repairs and restorations as it may, in its sole discretion, deem necessary. 15. NONINTERFERENCE AND COOPERATION: The DEPARTMENT and CITY shall do nothing to interfere with or prejudice the other's right or duty to recover damages or commence action against a third party, and shall furnish all reasonable assistance and cooperation in connection with any action against such third party, including without limitation assistance in the prosecution of suit. 16. DISCRIMINATION: The DEPARTMENT and the CITY shall not discriminate unlawfully on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, age or handicap in admission to, or treatment or employment in, programs or activities. 17. CERTIFICATIONS: The CITY will complete the attached Certification Document marked ATTACHMENT A, which will be incorporated as part of this AGREEMENT. 9 :r ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year written, and represent that the signatories below are duly authorized to execute this -AGREEMENT on behalf of their respective bodies, and that the effective date of this ,AGREEMENT is the date approved and executed by the Director of the DEPARTMENT. 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS RECOMMENDD:' AP ROVED: Gary R. Clark, Director J I Brunsvold, Director Office of Water Resources partment of Natural Resources Date: APPROVED: Robert iVlool, Legal Counsel UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ATTEST: APPROVED: Yorkville CITY Clerk Yorkville CITY Mayor Date: 10 APPENDIX B: ESTIMATED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS 24 Operation and Maintenance Costs for Yorville Dam (Annual$) Activity Unit Cost Qty Cost Notes Operation Dam Monthly WalkArounds $240 13 $3,120 $240/da =$20/hr+$10/hr benefits; 1person Engineering inspection $1,667 1 $1,667 Tri-Annual Cost divided by 3 Denis Annual Inspection $960 _.1 .., $960 2-person crew,2 days Bi-Annual Ins ection for Volume Upstream $480 1 $480 2 perso n crew,2 days,divided b y 2 Maintenance Dam Minor Maintenance,Branch Removal,Etc $480 12 $5,760 2 person crew,2 da er month S alling Concrete,Larger Repairs $4,000 1 $4,000 1 Major Annual Concrete Repair Denil Spring,Fall Months Only,semi-monthly,1/2 Minor Maintenance,Branch Removal,Etc $240 12 $2,880 crew-day Spalling Concrete,Larger Repairs $1,500 1 $1,500 1 Major Annual Concrete or Steel Repair Baffle Replacement $1,000 1 $1,000 $40,000 annualized over 40 yrs Sto Lo Re lacement $120 1 $120 $600 every 5 yrs Total Operation and Maintenance $21,4871 APPENDIX B ESTIMATED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS PHASE 1 Operation and Maintenance Costs for Yorville Dam (Annual$) Activity Unit Cost Qty otes Operation Dam Monthly Walk Arounds $240 13 $3,120$240 1da =$20/hr+$10/hr benefits Engineering Inspection 51,667 1 $1,667 Tri-Annual Cost divided by 3 Denil Annual Inspection $960 1 $960 2 person crew,2 days Bi-Annual Inspection for Volume Upstream $480 1 $480.2 person crew,2 days,divided by 2 Bypass Channel Engineering Inspection $1,667 1 $1,667 Tri-Annual Cost divided by 3 Monthly Walk Arounds $240 13 $3,120$240/da =$20/hr+$10/hr benefits Operate Sluice Gate $60 4 $240 2 hrs each time Operate Gages/Inspect $30 52 $1,560 1 hr each time,every week Maintenance Dam Minor Maintenance,Branch Removal,Etc $480 12 $5,760 2 person crew,1 day per month Spalling Concrete,Larger Repairs $4,000 1 $4,000 1 Major Annual Concrete Repair Denil Spring,Fall Months Only,semi-monthly,1/2 Minor Maintenance,Branch Removal,Etc $240 12 $2,880 crew-day Spalling Concrete,Larger Repairs $1,500 1 $1,500 1 Major Annual Concrete or Steel Repair Baffle Replacement $1,000 1 $1,000$40,000 annualized over 40 yrs Stop Log Re lacement $120 1 $120$600 every 5 vrs Bypass Channel Minor Maintenance,Branch Removal,Etc $480 16 $7,680 2 person crew,2 day per month,8 months/ r Spalling Concrete,Grouted Boulder,Larger Re airs $4,000 1 $4,000 1 Major Annual Concrete Repair Sluice Gate Maintenance $480 1 $480 2 person crew,1 day per year Sluice Gate Replacement $1,000 1 $1,000$20,000 annualized over 20 rs Gage Replacement $500 1 $5001$10,000 annualized over 20 yrs Total Operation and Maintenance $41,233 APPENDIX B ESTIMATED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS PHASE 2 APPENDIX C: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST 25 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST Dam Name : Date of Inspection : , 20 Time of Inspection : AM PM Name of Inspector : Reservoir Elevation ITEM NO YES IF YES Surface Cracks Contact IDNR-Office of Water Resources Slump or Slide on the upstream or downstream face Contact IDNR- Office of Water Resources Erosion from runoff,wave action or traffic Repair and stabilize Embankment, abutment or spillway seepage Contact IDNR- Office of Water Resources Seepage or flows of muddy water Contact IDNR- Office of Water Resources & ESDA Uneven settlement Contact IDNR- Office of Water Resources Uneven concrete blocks Level and stabilize Trees, brush or burrow holes on the embankment Remove trees and brush, fill holes Spillways or trash racks blocked Clear immediately Exposed metal is rusty Clean and paint Concrete deterioration or cracks Contact IDNR-Office of Water Resources Pipe joint separation Contact IDNR- Office of Water Resources Scour Contact IDNR- Office of Water Resources Vent pipe blocked If no flow over drop inlet, clear Height of grass : inches If more than 1 foot, schedule mowing Comments C-1 OPERA TIQ- MAIN 'N .ONCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST (CON'T) ITEM NO YES IF YES Cracks or leakage at sills Contact Superintendent Pools contain debris Remove Signs are obstructed of contain graffiti Contact Superintendent Buoys are positioned correctly Contact Superintendent Cracks or out of position boulders on chutes Contact Superintendent Comments: PLATES PLATE 1 DAM AND BYPASS CHANNEL CONFIGURATION INCLUDING DEWATERING BREACH LOCATION PLATE 2 GENERAL SPILLWAY CROSS SECTIONS PLATE 3 DENIL FISHWAY PLAN AND PROFILE PLATE 4 BYPASS PLAN COMPONENTS PLATES 5-8 BYPASS PLAN AND PROFILES PLATE 9 SIGNAGE LOCATION MAP PLATE 10 BUOY PLACEMENT MAP PLATE 11 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PLAN PLATE 12 LIGHTING PLAN PLATE 13 DEBRIS DEFLECTOR PLAN s ."Iwo A �: , �, ,,,� y: �• � ' •,1�0fix.: _ If. loop, JiL AL Ask am low . . •+ • � " ' •'•�'!'i►; `� + � it � a f y •'`��. _ j ,• , s sr, f _ v A - r '4 - _ i STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES YORKVILLE DAM —MULTI—PURPOSE DAM PROJECT — PHASE 1—OGEE AND ALOULIARY IMPROVEMENTS KENDALL COUNTY OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES GROUTED RIPRAP GROUT EL. 566.00 STONE RIPRAP, CLASS A6 (SPECIAL) 21.66 EXISTING RIVE EXISTING DAM BED ELEVATION ROPOSED STEPPED SPILLWAY S 10.00 14.50' 8.00 E . 9 EL, 575:08 3 c 568.5 0 N S ry Q v O NON-POROUS GRANULAR c N EMBANKMENT PLACE STONE RIPRAP, RIPRAP CLASS A4 (SPECIAL) FILTER 1 RIPRAP n TRANSITION TO BED FILTER 2 I ELEVATION q TRANSITION RIPRAP TO EXISTING RIVER EXISTING BED ELEVATION IMPACT BLOCK g 0 BED ELEVATION 5.00 10.00 30.00 MIN FOR DETAILS SEE 9 STRUCTURAL PLANS RIPRnp FOR EXISTING DAM EXCAVATE EXISTING BED AS NECESSARY TO REMOVE UNSUITABLE MATERIAL PER Kh EL STILL[ G BASIN EL, 57 SPECIAL PROVISION FOR NON-POROUS 568.88 575.08 _ - _ _ _ - iYP_ ° GRANULAR EMBANKMENT � - �.�, . V STONE RIPRAP, GI J 1 ... ( - SECTION A-A Ot_� �+ CLASS A4 (SPECIAL) a EST. N BED ROCK F EXCAVATE TO INDICATED EL. 565.5 e z DEPTH OR TO FIRM BEDROCK EST. RIPRAP W AS FIELD VERIFIED. SEE BED ROCK FILTER 2 Fa NOTE 2. EL. 566.5 � O q STONE RIPRAP, CLASS A7 (SPECIAL) SECTION F-F 0 10' 0' 30' I,,= 10' GROUTED RIPRAP b to EL 56&00 m N 0 TO 23.0 275 TO 43,5 14.50 800 21.66 EXISTING DAM EXISTING RIVER STONE RIPRAP, BED ELEVATION PROPOSED CLASS A7 (SPECIALI STONE RIPRAP STEPPED SPILLWAY CLASS AT (SPECIAL) EL. BOTTOM DEN1L FISHWAY EL 7 8 7 EL. ENTRANCE 566. EL 568ZI r a STONE RIPRAP, O ° O ° O ° NON-POROUS NOTEi a a CLASS A4 (SPECIAL) ° 0 O O E►®ANxMENT � � I. EXCAVATION FOR RIPRAP SHALL BE TO FOR ANCE FISHWAY .o THE INDICATED DEPTHS, OR TO FIRM Y = ENTRANCE o ^5 BEDROCK IF ENCOUNTERED AT A HIGHER T ELEVATION u i o FI RIPRAP RIPRAP ––– –––––– LTER 1 FILTER 2 -–––––– –––– ––––– 2. RIPRAP FILTERS) ARE NOT REQUIRED EXCAVATE 70 INDICATED DR CK A DEPTH –––– 1A10CFEROSTONE IRI eR CIALI THEN OR TO FIRM BEDROCK AS FIELD I ------ ----- VERIFIED 2 1 SEE SHEET >PNPCWI FOR DENIt FISHWAY DETAILS TOCREMOVEEU SUIT BED AS NECESSARY D T ATE 2 u a UNSUITABLE MATERIAL PER r L 1 0 SPECIAL PROVISION FOR NON-POROUS GRANULAR EMBANKMENT SECTION B-B i L 0 DRWG. $XSCMC10 FR-422 • 1 , � .�� •gyp 'n r r r r Loa MRS: 1 NO i logo NEI 8 , STATE OF ILLINOIS YORKVILLE DAM - MULTI-PURPOSE DAM PROJECT -PHASE 2 -CANOE AND FISH BYPASS CHANNEL DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES KENDALL COUNTY OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES LOWER DIVIDER ISLAND / w� i UPPER DIVIDER ISLAND WH[TEWATER BOATING AND „ BYPASS ENTRANCE � I � a • • 5 FT. WIDE CONCRETE PATH To PROTECT YORKVILLE ACCESS FOR PARK USERS, SPECTATORS, ^+ r ' � � � MAINTENANCE AND RESCUE. 5 FT. WIDE PROVIDE ACCESS. WATERLINE AND COORD. W/ _____= i i � CONCRETE PATH • BUUYS, SIGNS, AND LOWER • OVERFLOWS CAN SPILL EITHER PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS • FOR RIVER FLOWS OVER 5,000 Cf5 WATER SURFACE PROFILE DIRECT II II ; WAY, PATHS ON BOTH SIDES OF WHITEWATER BOATERS TO BYPASS BYPASS WILL BE INUNDATED BY • COMPLETE FLOW WATER WILL SPILL OVER ISLAND i0 ; f ENTRANCE. FLOODS. AUGMENTATION SYSTEM. ;--- i II BYPASS. PATHS ON BOTH SIDES OF II • BOATING ENTRANCE IS A SILL WITH CONDUIT CONSTRUCTED I I BYPASS WILL BE INUNDATED DURING • USE RIPRAP SPECIAL ON _ FLOODS. MOVABLE CONCRETE BLOCKS. SEVERAL TYPES OF BLOCKS WILL BE PROVIDED TO EXPOSED SURFACES. IN PH 1. FLOW. EXACT SETTINGS TO • PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTS s ROLLER COMPACTED CONCRETE (RCC) HEADWALL WITH CORE, FILL AND ROCK BE DETERMINED DURING CONSTRUCTION SLIDEGATE. r TUNING. • GROUTED BOULDER AND < SURFACE PROTECTION • ENTRY OVERFLOW WEIR MAXIMIZES FLOW RIPRAP PROTECTION OF ;j '� • EXPOSED ROCK SURFACES TO USE .�+ TO BYPASS AFTER FLOW AUGMENTATION CULVERT WATERLINE AT SILL 4. RIPRAP SPECIAL. ON BYPASS SIDE AND MIN. DAM OVERFLOW SATISFIED. LARGER PIECES OF STONE WILL BE • FOX Rl ver ' r PLACED AS CLUSTERS AND STEPS FOR I.; BANK ACCESS AND VIEWING. W I o Z I I 1 II � II II z Ln � Q X I 1 ' a w 3 i ii H. I NEW ::: - BUTMENT A I 11,!: FLOW i iii; R a - AUGMENTAIIONI : pl; PATH & FLOW -- ULVE I ; 'PI; AUG. CULVERT I G.. UPPER DIV Np y I I rI, HEADWALL & F pW pPGN POOL 9 �R - I'?' l ; ; � IV' I ; '�,; �3 8 E .�?., I yl, .----------- B P EN i °a kr POOL 7 POOL 6 POOL 5 POOL POOL 3 r ' Y ii co w 0 n EXTE D S ORM M-- o SEWEM OU FALLS PARK T & COORDINATE / Y a NEW PATH WITH EXTEND �M . STAIRS STORM Y SEWER M� Y OUTFALL Y LOWER LANDING AND POOL 9 LOWER DUAL WATERWAYS UPPER DUAL WATERWAYS UPPER LANDING AND PRIMARY MAINTENANCE ACCES • ACCESS FOR BOATING • MODERATE WATERWAY FOR EASIER MIDDLE OF BYPASS AND PARK • MODERATE WATERWAY FOR m m • POOL 9 AND TRANSITION TO BOATING EASIER BOATING D 0 DOWNSTREAM WATERWAYS • CHALLENGE WATERWAY MORE • CHUTE 2 CONSTRUCTED IN NOTCH • CHALLENGE WATERWAY MORE • ACCESS FOR BOATING, HEAVY Y Y • EDDY TURNS FROM BYPASS DIFFICULT. CHUTE AND FAST THROUGH EXISTING DAM. DIFFICULT, INCLUDES CHUTE MAINTENANCE, AND ADJUSTMENTS. WATERWAY WITH EDDIES AND WAVES. • 4 POOLS AND 2 AND HOLE. • BUOYS AND SIGNAGE HERE AND 0 u CONSTRICTION/SILLS WHICH ARE • ADJUSTABLE ENTRANCE TO UPSTREAM • ADJUSTABLE ENTRANCE TO ADJUSTABLE FOR WATER LEVEL MODERATE WATERWAY ALLOWS • LANDING FOR TAKEOUT FOR MODERATE WATERWAY ALLOWS FLOW AND PERFORMANCE TUNING. FLOW TO SPLIT AND UPSTREAM PADDLE BOATERS. SPLIT AND UPSTREAM POOL LEVEL • STORM SEWER OUTFALL UPSTREAM POOL LEVEL TUNING TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION COFFERS • L TUNING • PARK GRADING AND 12 FT. WIDE • PARK REGRADING AND 12 FT. PLACED THROUGH UPSTREAM OF • TWO STORM OUTFALLS. CONCRETE PATH ALLOWS WIDE CONCRETE PATH ALLOWS ENTRY STOPLOG AND OVERFLOW WEIR r • 12 FT. WIDE CONCRETE PATH ALLOWS EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS m EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS r • PROTECT EXISTING 24-IN DIP c • WATERLINE RIVER CROSSING A• A o �`/I�r A � 3 7y 4 L � L 0 0 FR-423 -- - DRWG. Bl OF B4 TEND R BYPASS PLAN COMPONENTS Sheet ---6-- of 66 - i�■■►ice■■■\\�■■► ►- .� .•w,--VIA 074;MIN _ `ErC�'1'� ►1�� ►�■��ttr.�-,._lR_�\`\. ■3 MEMO �■■■■i��������■■�i■+�■■_;��w� �■i-.�Fi."MEMO OEM MEN■107\rte i..`, ,•►.p■■■■■■►\\\. ., /►MME ���?�■! i!■■i=ce■!■��■�i■■C=%!■�=�•� - � N■■■�■■■■■■■■��:d■\iL,.�_ "'it■■■■■\■\\ VAX, _.� ►� �,�s+��=� � �*■■■■■/■►��■■iil■■\�_ �■■!\\\� i��:i� ♦ _ c .�.� ))I■■■■■■■\\■■\.\`\O\■\ \■'� �. �A`i/��, _ ���.\ �ioo_ .�///�I_-may �� -� ♦ S /_E �\ j - ��--�//��■�\��../.�G/%��//..rte /IP/ a i a ter. _ ■r � i .��. �. �►��ai \\: aim 9 i l`\: �� t/■lii ��_��� �1■/II!%/ �s , �` \II/�/ o �MI �l�i � /,%/.%■Ii%i � � !' � ,,�ill► ������ •5. �.-� � ��r_�• ...�� y1�,y sssk 1�ofoomaimpo.so \\S E���� WWWWMMM w Lou •► Nil .!I M 01 • i I I-• 1, , mill-i's - Zd7 _ �ii1, Ste. _ fiiii ::::: ::. ,,� •..._,. _._.......,...u..l•..iui.tll�tt�.It��.��..t�i..Ei.�,tE��,t��.�E��.i�ti 1000:!:l MEN �'�_.'�"��1••�- � 'i�, '. �Et '•'p?r (f:r ,����, I�r.�.,7C1 l��iE����:I�E�.�i1�,7t1n17t1� e. E � � � I �� �� 1 3� mi aw, • 110-1 Milli e SEEMS Mill ill 11111 aevt : MPN I • - • • • • I 0%%■■■ Ion ■ %■■■�■�' ice■■■■■■■■► ■■■\■\■\�� . .: ga��zz -�aa► �i■■�,.■■■a ■■. ,.,a■■ `ate.-�� ■OMNI W.1 ONE No o WE Sla ,. -■���■■iii■■.���_�IG■■■:%i■•,.ime- ■■■■■\\■■Ti? al WIN rRr LIKE YMA w �>>, -_ --�\. -- r`���►j,����� � �/■■_�■■iii■■!!1■\ „�. � I ul�, U ii► ..►�` \■■ ui� i� ��\\'r%'/"�� 1 CF� ■Iii■��ii_■■iii_ i�,ik • Ala► /��� ,.i/ \!1.■►� �1■/II■D�.� Imo. \\Il%/ _ •"��.ia, i Ri-� ■./%r.., ��'�/� �I� � � �r��';w\ o mss."_ ���1� �.+r I.,�rrr.��i_•=--;--� � � � _ , 01 Im IF i SO -�Ma \����/�i�■L�\\ -������ .Ii. * r�-Wi t=/�G ! ��1�=� ♦��MCI�\ _���� _` ■� \' ���� �%rim \ = ��� �� - ��� -0 Sm .. �6 1 Muni o ' d 7 CSFe: : :L'li" t• qql� p�7��.1L�7C1�.7 ; . :::: = :I:2i�i�eEhl� mom mom on - III��� ,�'�•v`►:f `\`_\':•' `'\�_ � - %[I■■•.�_. - � �.��■III .. -,�, �, � \ it ■■i = ° •� .%�L�C�IL � Ilfll / , 0 MR +^ ill �,����►�- :-P- . ►.�■ /■AI\'?Z_qw ` Dog MIR �Il\�� �` ■�A %'' � _�!I#,.���__ ►sae, ►�1►: �M■I/%' a OWN 0501 0 rill 1111H■■■Hll� \�@]fIL%.e' /, c711 ��►� f� �� !611■� �%� ; � ^\. ��n //. w./,��� .. I/�! � �a�\\�����■%iii �`�•+rj �\ w Ili .G�GI■■■\■�■■�%inn NW MINES woodocal ■����■■�i■■��/� �� / �— ��,I■!!lilt■OMEN ■■�i/��■■■1•r•\\..■■► oft ME MOON- VA MW so . . • -� L 1 �FE 'all . •. ..?c.:�e:.,:.;.•_�i�_�.*�pp �:epTc�y�lhEll]EEi�Eli��E1i�5Tll�me;:: '; I �! �������'�I�I'i.I;��li`I]lil`fhl'f7�2 liiaFiNiiNpiNi6l7ii.i�'li-`i r.,• • i. ..•.. ' ° tea, ---����r�®�.,�����,Ie�11B2E13.t►���;!�l�.�l;l;�F�I������m;>��r�s�,����i��'��:��r��:!��-� � ���� ITA 1 �� I •�■■■■■■�� � o � ��=a♦ �ar�r�«��rim .a \\\►\ �® � ,rte �► i���,��_= IWO as III ft ���� _ - .. . . • •. • � S 1 .. -tea \\ �_��� ��_, I• �/■A��IC��er,�, ��• / ,��"• � 111 \�� inA■%%' ' I►�JMW1■AI\'i� I�i����s �iiJ��i� l�► l!I'1 • `,���►\,�■■■�I/.%% %� MHOMMUS /III■ PRIM M Qom;;'' � �■3,���--- ./ �:��\, ��1� ��■I//.%' rf am �:�-=�� � , — \111H■■■HII\ hl`_J.J� � x-711 I:�Vii-� •� `��//_� ,��/�\\\�_��_�/�%iii ME \ �� ���,.��.i may+■■�__ ----�/i■%%G:.�i■\\►■■■■�► ■■CG■■�■■■■�■/� �� �",���_ �'WIN" __I_■_■_��-i�%�"_ `'� e , ��' .+�a�:.a_te.�._� _���11■�■�■■�■■■��■�i 1%■a■� all � MI-A, �r�►\\��■,■i ►ice''-I� ` .• .�, . . ,, .. .. X11 Offil oil I 9 -,Mill Buff • _. . E IMP mil��.:::::::::::: ' 1111111 Ne:n104eu 1110111 Ems F .1 li Ill= Ill 11 ': I._:. IM YORKVILLE DAM MULTIl-PURPOSE DAM PKOJECT-PHASE 2 CANOE AND FISH BYPASS UtIANNEL KENDALL COUNTY N 181.2931 38 OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES E 954288:05 BOTTOM EL. 584.0 0 100, FLOATING SIGN E 954491.16 Edge of Fox River N 1812237.09 E 955403.15 F BOTTOM EL. 582.0 NOTES I. See drawing C6 for sign details and elevations. 2. Northerly and Easterly points are for the t of the center post on all Signs 3. — Denotes orientation of sign face 4. Floating sign shall be Rolyan model B4872PF "KEEP OUT" or approved equal. :-:j-_Ll Creek 5. Sign 5 extends Into the roller compacted concrete. ............. Required coring Is Included in the cost for wood sign FLOATING SIGN N 1812674.14 E 954075.55 FLOATING SIGN �qrllngton Nort N 18 2574.99 -hern Railroad E 9514'467.03 B111 of Material Q Downstream Divider Island 41 item Sign Panel-Type J Flow Augment tion Pipe Sq.Ff. 352.0 C/L DAM STA 1+68.15 Upstream Divider Island W-d Sign S)jppart rool 327.0 N 1812477 87 C/L BYPASS Floating 99n — E 954246.39 BOTTOM EL. 581.0 0 N 1812452 00 N 1812313.04 BOTTOM EL. 582.0 MA[N WAY N 1812314.11 E 954851.22 -BOTTOM-Et.-58,10 (MOUNTED ON BOTH SIDES OF POSTS, N 1812329.80 E 954714.39 [L OUNTED ON BOTH SIDES OF RJDSTSI;� N 1812429.60 C. A A (MOUNTED ON BOTH SIDES OF POSTS) ........ a. UPSTREAM SEE DETAIL Inc LA Te 9 FR-423 TENG BOATING AND PARK SIGNAGE Sheet 14 of SIR YORKVILLE DAM —MULTI—PURPOSE DAM PROJECT —PHASE 2—CANOE AND FISH BYPASS CHANNEL KENDALL COUNTY OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES 19 , N 0 50' 100' COAST GUARD TYPE ASS I"= 50' KEEP CHANNEL AND DAY WARN/NG BUOYS 2" orange reflective band M BS Exterior 0 4f7/Ci '^ SATONS standard symbol for L Buoyance//N.Submerged shall be approximately 39 O1 I T Boat Exclusion Area 2. Draft shall be oppraximatey 9 In. U I Submerged Buoyancy shall be opproximatey 100 lbs. 4- Dimensions and speclflcotions reference Rolyon Buoys Coast Guard Type ASS.BSCPRSW. Actual bury must be at least an approved equal. 5• Cast for buoy Includes connecting links,chain,swivels, 6, Chain shackles, anchor Ul/ink stag1 9 P g phu 3/eat,Estimated length for each buoy Is 11 feel,however Contractor should verify In the field. Connecting link 38" Swivel Connecting link Shockle 200 IDs anchor weight (Rolyan 1321620 or equivalent) ........... BUOY DETAIL - -- _....BU..OY 8 OF 8 N T812657.91- O E 955894.09 BUOY 7 OF 8 N 1812627.66 E 955732.89 z BUOY 6 OF 8 •-"••••",,, A N 1812597.40 E 955570.69 .—.._- ._.__- �.--__.—.r._ i �• --BUOY 5. 017 --•.�, C7 N 1812567.14 i o • E 955408.49 Fox River .... N BUOY 4 OF 8 N 1812536.88 j E 955246.28 �B5' O / i BUOY 3 OF 8 N 1812506.62 Bill of Molerlol Q E 955084:08 �5Y i llem Un/l Oty i BUOY 2 OF 8 N 1812476.36 i boys Eo. 8 P. E 954921,88 X55' i i w BUOY 1 OF 8 c N 1812446.11 i E 954759.68 �e5' i i n g o � Bearing N 79° 25' 59" E ♦� 4 Pt'PHpi ��i Y /—Existing Staff Gage Location F e m a _ 4 � ../ � � �M -:�._.•Y m --- . A e i 0 0 FE.i —A A 7 a a - � �������� �������������������--a in� R.R. ;F Lit E� _..._.. ._..____ DRWG. C7 OF C NO- � mcA>L� 10 FR-423 '° BUOY PLACEMENT Sheet 16 of 66 o lMm ur luuwla TVrU%V1LLC LP IYI - ANIViII ry rvui. vnm rnwca.l -rrwac o - rG✓Galnu+n onlv�°c v�cn ♦.nnvc nlw .wn •.,rr•w v.u+.�.�rr pEpARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES KENDALL COUNTY OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES B.M. #2: Metal plug in chiseled square on north abutment. Elev. 582.00 (NGVD '29) N 1812333.455 E 954238.328 QESM SPECIFICATIONS 157'-6"Bock to Back of Abutments 152' 2" Face to Face of Abutments 2002 AASHTO Load Factor Design and FOX RIVER CANOE BYPASS Guide Specifications for design of BUILT 2011 BY Pedestrian Bridges Published by o AASHTO, August 1997 3 Pedestrian Truss IL. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES n, OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES DESIGN STRESSES 3° rElev.s574.74-upertructure f'c = 3,500 psi O% I" Open Jt, sn 50° NAME PLATE fy = 60,000 psi(reinforcement) EL. 586.30 Stone Face Finish (See Standard 51500D fy = 50,000 psi(M270, Grade 50W) Superstructure Proposed Sidewalk Allowable Rock Bearing Pressure, Oollow = 50 tsf Note: Attach name plate to east Existing F Medion W.S.E. 572.00* 10' min. vertical E wingwall at south abutment. A N Ground clearance Existing Sidewalk Pedestrian Live Load = 85 psf .......................—.......... ................_W. Wr a s............................................ ......... ...... J/ Drilled Shafts SEISMIC A A Approx. Bedrock Streambed EL. 566.0 SPC = A Notes: A = 0.059 EL EVA TM L The bridge shall be constructed at right angles to the existing north abutment. Site Coefficient (S) = 1.0 The Engineer shall verify the bridge alignment and location of south abutment prior to construction. 2. Section A-A shown on sheet 5. ` h � R. 7 E. Existing dam abutment : `:'�: •\,! •� �� k." ...�......... I C/L DAM STA 1+68.15 ,. y .' o l I C/L BYPASS 10+00 ..... I :...o.._ _ m a� � \1 N I \ S 1 \ ° ° Project N 1812399.42 �5 � w CP#1 I� E 954246.41 i . 0+10 I a� J i - < _ Location .U........ Sta N 1812242.0$00 I o 3 00 I o I I a • +1 BM#2 0 E 954229.©170 : 0+ w �A I Existing retaining wa vj Existing Flow Augmentation Pipe :966. 5.5.............. x' `� Q w j .... ... .... o CI Y I KVI L 1; 1. Namg•'PIgtQ` I Existing pavilion (Typ. w ""' ' '' o Sto's. 9*28.4A an Waterway'. loctitrpn I to be removed by oth rs : LOCATION SKETCH sto. !-`do a 3 I w Note U I O I p) _ 9x31.F8 [ :; � Pedestrian Bridge USGS Gauge Station Walkway m =1 --_ _._-_ __ _ �': - - =I'? er - - - - -- -- - -- - - — -- - I w Bock of North Abutment ,j.r'.' ;./ " 86°5�56 I I I o Sta. 0+43.77 � Back Of SOUL t N ;:• � k h Abutm I w Sta. 2+OL27 a EL, 586.30 EL:586.30 I 24„ fG / w TOTAL BILL OF MATERtAL a ' Item Unit Total Exist. Path w ► ; (� I Pedestrian Truss Superstructure Sq Ft 1,294 o ` Perimeter Erosion Barrier and limits Reinforcement Bars, Epoxy Coated Pound 4,300 I, a /!: of Seeding, Mulching, and Fertilizing Concrete Structures Cu Yd 17 ..,:.. 1 '�:':'.;`:`.'• �e.,: Structure Excavation Cu Yd 30 Existing railing to be relocated It !fY. r !; ` �,°' I ;' Name Plates Each 1 Y % ' ' as shown on sheet 11 to occom modate abutment m Bridge Seat Sealer Sq Ft 21 Y Pedestrian Railing Foot 40 ° Stone Face Finish Sq Ft 199 k ° i �r�,y O — d shaft in Soil Cu Yd 3.1 _..... '� Drille ° Drilled Shaft in Rock Cu Yd 1,2 Permanent Casing Foot 34 �. Existing retaining wall 3 Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk 6 Inch Sq Ft 48 60 : ;.: . Perimeter Erosion Barrier Foot 85 r Seeding, Mulching, and Fertilizing Acre 0.01 Gage Station Walkway L Sum I W L� _ PLAN PLATE - WARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES KENDALL COUNTY OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES Q. PAUL J. Existing dam abutment [DSEF DETAIL 1/17 FOR JUNCTION BOX LIGHTING AND LIGHTING CIRCUIT CONNECTION TO FIXTURE. S 05 PROVIDE FLEXIBLE CONDUIT AT ALL EXPANSION JOINTS.SEE DETAIL 6,117. SEE ENLARGED DE TA A M LIGHT POLE SUPPORT PROVIDED BY BRIDGE SUPPLIER.SEE DETAIL IVIT. COORDINATE FINAL 0i 4 ON SHEET 17 LOCATION WITH RESIDENT ENGINEER. Lli Exisflng Retg:i i g 0 PROVIDE A PULL WIRE IN ALL CONDUITS FOR FUTURE USE. BORE Ul CONOUIT LEGEND Exit L C. Existing Flow EI q: i. U 'IV BRIDGE LIGHTING AND USGS CABINET POWER. Augmentation Pipe 010. �314"r-IRGS) ABA % PR CUT EXISTING r7,-N\ 0,00 1p T -t 31`78 1 25 Pedes ri e STA. 9#54 24- EXIST RGROUND I 1121C. FLtCTRICAL LECFMO Back of North Abutment of South )Z( EXISTING POLE MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE jSTA X PROPOSED POLE MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE & E— EXPOSM CONDUIT ON BRIDGE UNDERGROUND CONDUIT - ELECTRIC NN SEE ENLARGED DETAIL,,, . . . . . ......... ... ......... . . .............. ........ s ON SHEET 17 Perimeter Erosion Barrier XIS UTILITY POLE Q, STA. 1-96 RY ELECTRX VICE NEW ' ND SERVICE BILL OF MATERIAL Exist. Path PAY ITEM UNIT OUANTITY 0. EXISTING XIST GROUND PULLBOX BRIDGE LIGHTING L.SUM I PROVIDE IN EXISTING ADUl (b C ME 20V CIRCUITS TO AND LIGHTIAG CONTROLLER F isrlN4 C4 NO LIGHTING CONTROLLER Existing retaining wail PLAN 20 0 20 40 LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE FIXT. DESCRIPTION R LAMPS/ VOLTS MOUNTING REMARKS MAKLIFACTURE TYPE & CAT.NO. WATTS F1 HID CAGED ACORN GLOBE STYLE POLE STERNBERGs 1-10OW wS. 120 MOUNTED ON A MOUNTED LIGHTING FIXTURE. 18 114CH 113OA/A/SP/ ANSI CODE 12*-O"H x 5 WIDE. 35 INCH TALL WITH A CLEAR 478PMI NO. S54. OM ROUND TEXTURED ACRYLIC LENSE. CAST I0OHPSI2O/ 138 TOTAL STRAIGHT FLUTED ALUMINUM FITTER.CAST ALUMINUM POLE RE3GlBK INPUT WATTS ALUMINUM R. 7 E. BRACKET CAST BALLAST HOUSING POLE WITH ASSEMBL�.HPF -20 DEC,F.CNA DECORATIVE BALLAST,4XV RATED PORCELAIN BASE AND SIDE SOCKET TYPE 3 OPTICS. BLACK SPIKED POLE POLYES�ER POWDER COAT CAP. MOOELi 4212/ FP5/SSCC/BK Project It I F2 SAME AS TYPE Fl EXCEPT WITH 6'-0" STERNBERGs HOOW HPS. 120 PROVIDE 10"DIA. I HIGH POLE. 113DA/A/SP/ ANSI CODE BOLT CIRCLE FOR 0 4TOPM/ NO. S54. THIS POLE. IOOHPSI2O/ 138 TOTAL RE3G/BK INPUT WATTS STERNBERG POLE F3 WALL MOUNTED HID LIGHT FIXTURE. XENALLi HOOW MPS. 120 SURFACE CONDUIT DIE-CAST ALUMINUM HOUSINr. MSISED/S/MB/ ANSI CODE ENTRY FOR FIXTURE. C y KVI L ENCLOSURE.HPF -20 DEG.F.CWA 138 TOTAL CE IBALLAST.BLACK FINISH INPUT WATTS LOCATION SKETCH STATE OF IWNOIS YORKVILLE DAM - MULTI-PURPOSE DAM PROJECT - PHASE 3 -PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER CANOE AND FISH BYPASS CHANNEL DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES KENDALL COUNTY EXISTING CLASS A7 (SPECIAL) AB RIPRAP (10'north) Anchor Rod •• /,r=954459.52 After rProof tLoading ••• AIO . } >`-) I E=954449 BI / / N=1 129. .fi . . S �.. o : a : N=1812911.5`2 ! �f 572 873.: 1 l0 Loading .• U' long lad fte4r4 Proofn :: Anchor t Wetland - -1812911.00 ., .. X19 Exls Ing We i N ,q� .:: -.• . ; 6 .. .... ..i 'Anchors Rod Location.. ° A9 =954454?35 . '..long lead )� � � E J `v °\o 0 =1812903.2 1. C41+90 A pprox. Existing.Edge of Water f bo --- Anchor Location '0 br\5 d\ng \ After Proof Loading -�1 - cw -=954464.29 60 105° 31' 4B" aq F\o°t\,\q' 8 in ction #a N=1812901.00 A $ J.91+g0 �� Iota\ti\n6t s oPProx o y14 EI954444.74 `�^.;_Afte�rProoftLoadln9 . a J f:. �' _ ae�te N N=1812901.33 : E=954464.14 s / m 1 N=18128.90.99 BCldle Point .. Anchor Rod io- m and center of •• angle 32° Proposed.Concre er _..... C7L AM STA 6+60 Pedestal 1812898 59 i . anchor shall e a minimum of 1 ° J 192 20 ` o(. 572f=954454.62. N ••i the ground surface after roof loading below kips, DAM .39 LL STA DENIL FISHWAY aY N=1512901.20 Anchor.Rod p g p a / STAr41+86.70 a to Pn ngle 32° i and shall be a Monta Ray model MR-1 or approved N 1812888.50 v �' Pnaror FLOW =954454.30 i equal. / E 954299.19 t 0" N=18I2901.16 •• This Is the horizontal location and vertical elevation ,- ` w / _ ak �p9 571 ! of a point on the anchor rod where It is estimated 2 / = pPf o - Proposed Floatfrig Debris Deflector i .. to enter the ground. The angle shown Is the 568.5 L` J P 512 i proposed vertical driving direction measured from a level (horizontal) plane. The horizontal < -'568 i direction/location is determined from the coordinate m 7 0"..from fare of anchor pipe to attachment hole In boom. at each end of the anchor. -567.5 --"/ Slide Post Anchor attooh @d. fQiid:Deflector Plate to overlap anchor pipe. j! o to side'of Denit Fish Ladder Eicfend Debris Screen to sleeve. EXISTING PROPERTY'LINE) ! 567 iBBe,! og Boom..Attachment Detail) -•5665 - 1 ! The sourface afiter proof loading to 3b below the m See detQ'is on s let 19 gr un ° 3'-0" ! shall be a Manta Ray model MR-4 or approved equal. �44 N ! ' Debris Deflecf&-S7r' lead Wetland Limit i .... The anchors shall be Installed and proof loaded to a a on Log Boom thatipthe load wilshall be then be bridled toeallsthe r Plate a ! anchors. A lead shall then be attached to the .566.5 ' bridle and proof loaded to 2 5 kips In the expected Deflector t tI e : direction of resultant load from the boom I ne v° 567 j i m M 587.5 .. ; Note: Afiter the anchors have been installed and roof x to the sfdebanchor gat thebflshsfaddeedanddto the . •5685 ; ! Proposed i main east anchor and adjusted to provide the t I Concrete Pedestal required Yedd 10' tag. The flank boom shall then be m 569 i 2'-0" ! attached anchor on the north end and to Debrls Screen an approprlate link on the main boom line. Existing f W t ZApprox� Edge o a er ... •`. .._.... i - 0 l0' 0' 30' I"= 10' Elevation 575.5 i Anchor Eye and Schockle, i LOG BOOM ATTACHMENT DETAIL to tie adjusted length smay even i Elevation 577.1 distribution of loads to all ._ - _ anchors In the group. 595 6., Radius 595 Q" ---- - Ty�p west & -- -- ---- ... .... ------ .. .. ..... .. .... ... ... . --- xisti 9 ground C C .... .... . .. .. : ... ..... . . ... .. .. ... Proposed +� n: 590 _ Concrete Pealesta _ o _..... ...... _. ._.. .. . . _.. .. _. n 574. n r 3, 0„ 590 _. _. .. _ _ Elevation 1 .. ... _.. _._. _. ... ;....... . _ Anchor Rod 585 585 MAIN EAST ANCHOR DETAILS 580 ...... .. ..... . . .. ._ .... ._._ .. . ... .. ..... _. .. ..... :. .... . :Anhor .}:..e:d. ... �.:: of...flan ..bo _.. _ 575 _ 575 apa a Footing r s a c o m m - - - See }e edhr tah. E - e ail . . s et.:. �\\ O ... '. _. .... ._..:: ... i0. xr ::...... .. . : .. .. :: .. :...: ._. - :_.. . ..... .... .. _, .. - .- .. .. ::. nch r a +ext nst .... Ch f d flee or 149n nt. \ 570 _ . ._ ext tino ..ha nel .Ott m 570 v u .. .. ....... .. _. ... ... . . .. .. a ..z ti..n.. . .ac . . _. ..._. l fir S _. : _.. ... o:t•ln :Oeb ls-D fie for Exits.rng f dal ng. -- - - ex ns\o o main 565 ... 565 .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... ... ..Y .. ....... .... .. .: : .... deft' cto bo'in:al me t _.. 560 560 ' r c... M o0 . .. .. ev.Z .. ::. ... .... ..... ... ...... .... . .. .. . . .. ... _ o b ... ... .. .. .. .... °W � 555 555 In0 \n O 00 v!In m0 �N O\p NO mp MO O In �': m m ul W N N I.1 N O D�N N..-� N P, N Q to _. ,0 10 10 ID W ID r N �-Co ti m m O co..: N r N r N N r, Nail N l0 N tD (V�D V9 tD N 1p 'n tD to I ti N tV ti t(1 Ln Ln la lD a0 m In In LL'1 In Yl Yl N In Ln Ln N N Ifl In ll'I 40+60 40+80 41+00 41+20 41+40 41+60 41+80 42+00 42+20 42+40 0+20.24 0+40.24 0+60.24 0+80.24 1+00.24 x; LA ' Q Entire Sheet Revised 310212011, GUS DEBRIS. DEFLECTOR FOR DENIL FISH LADDER PLAN FR-430 Sheet 18 of 19 6/20/2011 United City of Yorkville Glen D Palmer Dam Bypass and Marge Cline Whitewater Course Maintenance Obligations May 24, 2011 Eusr;;c-cy 17swaLLr 8rcsehrm-mlo® f4ttil hntwaw a Skr SRi hw4 l<<i.slrng 12Gm 6/20/2011 Weekly maintenance Mowing, trimming, weeding Trash removal General obstruction removal In bypass area In fish ladder area General inspection of area Notice problems associated with less frequent inspections Monthly maintenance Inspect the fish ladder for trash, debris, and logs items impeding water flow Should also occur after heavy rain events 6/20/2011 Semi-annual maintenance ��Walk around" checklist Contact IDNR if: Surface cracks in concrete Slump or slide on the upstream or downstream face Embankment, abutment or spillway seepage Seepage or flows of muddy water Uneven settlement Semi-annual maintenance Contact IDNR if (continued) : Concrete deterioration or cracks Pipe joint separation Scour Cracks or leakage at sills 6/20/2011 Semi-annual maintenance Walk around" checklist City repairs if: Erosion from runoff, wave action, or traffic Uneven concrete blocks Trees, brush or burrow holes on the embankment Spillways or trash racks blocked Exposed rusty metal Semi-annual maintenance City repairs if (continued) : Vent pipe blocked Grass over 12" tall Pools contain debris Signs are obstructed or contain graffiti Boulders out of position Place buoys before May 15t" and remove prior to November 15t BKFD to assist! 6/20/2011 Annual maintenance Grease the sluice gate Items to purchase? Life vests (4) Estimated cost - $300 Hydraulic winch, to remove large logs from channel Estimated cost $1,500 to $2,000 6/20/2011 costs Annual of - AcSlvl - Unit Cast Gtt Cos[ Notes aki4n [lam Month( Walk Araunds $240 19 '$3,120$2AOlda =$2@Jhr+$18fnr 6erw60.s En nee I ecSlon $1 Bn7 1 $1J667 Tri-pn nuaP Cost divided 3 Oenil Mnual ins tlun $960 1 38&12 arson cnew,2da .Mnual9ns ecGOn for VOtumeU dream $4[19 b 34803 anon new 2da s dividetl 2 Annual k3 ass Ch ennel _ E Ineenn !ns lion. 51,667 1 $tna7 Tn-Mnuas Cast divided 3 Mmntl Walk prnunds $240 13 $3120$240fda =32Nhr+St Ofrtr teret4s rate Sluice Gate $60 A 52-00 2 hrs each lime 0 erale Ga eaPons et 330 52 31,56@ 1 hr each hma,ewe week costs of Maintenance Dern Minor Maintenance,Rranch Remavat,Etc $480 12 $5,760 2 person craw,1 day rmomn SpalllnQ Concrele,Larger Repairs 54,890 1 $4,000 1 Ma'cr An nuaI Concrete Repair aenl Spnng,Fall Months Only,sernbmonthly,112 Manor Maintenance,Branch Removal.Etc $240 12 $2,280 rcrme�w-dav S Itn Concrete,Lar er Re ears 51,560 _ 00 nual Grsncrele ar Sleel R®air 51.000 5 $1,000 n+ralizeii over 40 s Sto LO Re cement $120 1 $1205 s B ass Channel Minor Maintenance,Branch Removal,Etc $480 16 $7,580 ew,2 day per month,8 month r Spelling Concrete,Grouted Boulder,Larger Repairs 34,000 "1 $4,000 1 M2',A —lConcrete Re air Sluice Gaut Maintenance $4301 1 $4130 2 person crew,1 My pef year Slulce Gale Replacerne nt $1,000 1 31,000$20,OQ0 annualized over 20 Vn Gage Re acemeni $500 1 $500$10,090 annualized dear 20 vrS TotaE© retidn and Maintenance $41.7.33 6 6/20/2011 Annual costs of maintenance Non-staff costs One annual large concrete repair @ $4,000 One annual repair to fish ladder @ $1,500 Replacement of fish ladder baffles @ $1,000 per year (40 year life span) Replacement of fish ladder stop log @ $120 per year (5 year life span) One annual concrete repair in bypass @ $4,000 Sluice Gate replacement @ $1,000 per year (20 year life span) TOTAL ESTIMATE PER YEAR @ $11,620 Other issues? Insurance To be completely finalized in FY 13 Recreational amenities have strong tort immunities Possibility City may have to increase base property insurance rates to accommodate maintenance of a unique feature, or a separate policy I.E. Add parks, add insurance cost 6/20/2011 No UIEGUARDS ON DUTY Other issues? Life safety t � /y y�p�RNIN wr��r�wAT�R RAP I p 5 RAPID BEFORE BOATING BOAT AT YOUR OWN RISK USE LIFE VEST IN RAPIDS ND FISHING IN TlIE BYPASS CHANNEL FOR EMERGENCY CALL 1-630-553-4343 Other issues? Life safety Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District to undergo swiftwater training, by Geneva Kayak employees More spectators, more likely to have emergencies reported than on open river 6/20/2011 Other issues? Park issues Alcohol is not allowed in parks, but is allowed under certain circumstances in the water Parking! Traffic on whitewater course Traffic on land Timeline IDNR contract for completion extended through September to address erosion issues Phase III (bridge!) expected to be completed by end of calendar year 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� 6 Legal ❑ II#6 EST. 1&36 Finance El Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator El r� �! �© Consultant El PS 2012-14 Chief of Police ■ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Police Reports for January—March, April, & May 2012 Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Molly Schwartzkopf Police Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Yorkville Police Department Manhour Report This report is based on actual hours per month, not payroll periods. January February March April Through June 2,2012 Regular OT Regular OT Regular' OT Regular OT Administration Chief 173.33 n/a 173.33 n/a 173.33 n/a 173.33 n/a Deputy Chief(2) 346.66 n/a 346.66 n/a 346.66; n/a 346.66' n/a Records Staff Executive Assistant 173.33' n/a 173.33: n/a 173.33 n/a 173.33 n/a Records Clerk(2 F1 346.66 n/a 346.66 n/a 346.66 n/a 346.66 n/a Records Clerk(1 PI 22.75 n/a 13.00 n/a 14.50: n/a 20.25 n/a Investigations Detectives (2) 346.66 7.00 346.66 2.00 346.66 4.50 346.66 15.00 Drug Officer(1) 173.33 20.50 173.33' 13.00 173.33. 10.00 173.33 11.50 Community Policing School Resource (2) 173.33 0.00 173.33' 5.00 346.66 n/a 346.66 4.00 Patrol Sergeants (4) 693.32 0.00 693.32 0.00 693.32 3.00 693.32 6.00 Officers (13) 2426.62 33.50 2426.62 44.50 2253.29 61.50 2253.29 73.00 Officers (PT - 5) 74.00 n/a 56.00 n/a 64.00 n/a 68.00 n/a Part_-Time/Civilian BFPC Secretary 11.75. n/a 26.75', n/a 23.25 n/a 18.75 n/a Cadet (1 - Jan/Mar) 71.25 n/a n/a n/a 35.00 n/a n/a. n/a Crossing Guards (3) 57.00 n/a 60.00 n/a 51.00 n/a 60.001 n/a Evidence Custodian 26.50 n/a 44.00 n/a 46.00 n/a 43.00 n/a Total Hours 5116.49 61.00 5052.99 64.50 5086.99 79.00 5063.24 109.50 **This column is the current month's manpower;it does not reflect prior month's manpower shifts. Yorkville Police Department Manhour Report This report is based on actual hours per month, not payroll periods. May June July August Through June 2,2012 Regular OT Regular OT Regular OT Regular OT Administration Chief 173.33 n/a 173.33 n/a Deputy Chief(2) 346.66 n/a 346.66 n/a Records Staff Executive Assistant 173.33 n/a 173.33 n/a Records Clerk(2 F1 346.66 n/a 346.66 n/a Records Clerk(1 PI 18.00 n/a n/a Investigations Detectives (2) 346.66 2.25 346.66 n/a Drug Officer(1) 173.33 39.00 173.33 n/a Community Policing School Resource (2) 346.66 8.00 346.66 n/a Patrol Sergeants (4) 693.32 30.00 693.32 n/a Officers (13) 2253.29 78.00 2253.29 6.00 Officers (PT - 5) 122.75 n/a 20.00 n/a Part-Time/Civilian BFPC Secretary 2.00 n/a 0.50 n/a _ .-------------- ------ Cadet ------------:---------- (1 -Jan/Mar) n/a n/a n/a n/a Crossing Guards (3) 36.00. n/a n/a n/a Evidence Custodian 59.50 n/a n/a Total Hours 5091.49 157.25 4873.74 6.00 0.00 0.0*01 0.00 0.00 "This column is the current month's manpower;it does not reflect prior month's manpower shifts. Yorkville Police Department - Overtime Manhour Utilization Report - April 30, 2012 This report is based on hours paid out per payroll period (bi-weekly). Does not include overtime taken as compensatory time. Date Court Training Relief I Details I Admin I Emerg I Invest OIC Pay I Comm. Full Time Part Time 05/07/11 6.00 17.75 0.00; 0.001 0.00 3.7.50 7.75' 12.00 12.00 93.00 198.50 05/21/11 4.00 8.00 40.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 16.00: 8.100. 82.00 197.25 06/04/11 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 3.00 27.75` 4.00 0.00 42.75 150.00 06/18/11 13.50 7.50 26.00 7.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 8.00 0.00 63.25 143.50 07/02/11 9.50 0.00 0.00 20.00 6.00 0.00 1.75 10.00 0.00 47.25 170.00 .07/16/11 0.00 0.00 39.75' 15.00 j 0.00 0.00 20.50 4.00 0.00 79.25 226.25 07/30/11 4.00 0.00 44.50 0.00, 0.00 0.00 _5.00 14.00 0.00 67.50 _ 135.25 08/13/11 4.00 4.00 48.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.50 i 8.00 0.00 79.50 169.75 08/27/11 8.75! 0.00 68.001 6.001 0.00 0.00 11.50 10.00 1.50 105.75 98.00 09/10/11 2.00 16.25 48.00 1 12.00 0.00 0.00 13.SOi 6.00 0.00 97.75 111.50 09/24/11 0.00 0.00 13.50; 4.001 0.00 0.00 17.75 8,00 0.00 43.25 67.50 10/08/11 9.00 0.00 37.50 5.00; 0.00 0.00 18.50 0.00 0.00 70.00 48.00 10/22/11 0.00 0.00 23.00, 22.00 0.00 0.00 IO.SOI 0.00 35.00 90.50 60.50 11/05/11 4.00 0.00 0.00; 5.00 0.00 0.00 8.50 0.00; _3.00 20.50 64.00 11/19/11 2.00 10.00 93.00' 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.50 8.00 0.00 129.50 44.00 12/03/11 2.00' 0.00 4.50; 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.25' 0.00 0.00 10.75 60.50 12/17/11 4.00 0.00 31.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.50: 2.00 0.00 65.50 90.00 12/31/11 2.00 5.25 1.2.00; 0.00 13.00 0.00 26.50 8.00 0.00 66.75 113.00 01/14/12 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 28.75 0.00 0.00 30.75 129725 01/28/12 6.00 18.75 0.00 0.001 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 27.75 35.50 02/11/12 0.00 16.00 0.00 0.0011 0 00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0.00 21.50 70.00 02/25/12 4.00' 11.00 0.00 9.001 0.00 0.00 13.00 4.00 0.00 41.00 40.00 03/10/12 5.50 0.00 8.00 0.001 0.00 4.00 1.00 4.00 0.00 22.50 52.00 03/24/12 0.00: 0.00 0.00 12.00: 0.00 2.00 7.50 2.00 0.00 23.50 87.00 04/07/12 6.00 12.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.50 10.00 0.00 48.00 47.50 04/21/12 7.00 16.00 4.00! 0.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 35.00 56.00 04/30/12 6.00 0.00 14.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 8.00 0.00 56.00 21.50 FY10 11 Court Training Relief Details Admin Emerg Invest OIC Pay Comm. Full Time Part Time Totals 109.25 143.00 540.75 121.00 21.00 46.50 333.75 132.00 57.50 1504.75 2664.75 Percents 7% 10% 36% 8% 1% 3% 22% 9% 4% 100% N/A Average 1 4.20 5.50 20.80 4.65 0.81 1.79 12.84 5.08 2.21 57.88 102.49 "Note: Part-Time Hours include Officers, Cadet, Evidence Custodian Prepared by Molly Schwartzkopf 6/6/2012 Pagel Yorkville Police Department - Overtime Manhour Utilization Report - June 2, 2012 This report is based on hours paid out per payroll period (bi-weekly). Does not include overtime taken as compensatory time. Date Court Training Relief I Details I Admin Emerg Invest OIC Pay Comm. Full Time Part Time 05/05/12 2.00' 0.00 0.00; 0.001 0.00 0.00 3.50 4.00 0.00 9.50 34.00 05/19/12 6.00' 10.00 0.00 0.00' 0.00 20.00 12.25 0.00 8.00 56.25 61.25 06/02/12 10.75 5.25 6.00! 66.50 0.00 0.00 5.00 4.00' 0.00 97.50 107.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 . ...;_ ._ I . . -- --- 0.00 _--_ -_ - i - 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FY10 11 Court Training Relief Details Admin Emerg Invest OIC Pay Comm. Full Time Part Time Totals 18.75 15.25 6.00 66.50 0.00 20.00 20.75 8.00 8.00 163.25 202.25 Percents 11% .9% 4% 41% 0% 12% 13% 5% 5% 100% N/A Average 6.25 5.08 2.00 22.17 0.00 6.67 6.92 2.67 2.67 6.28 67.42 "Note: Part-Time Hours include Officers, Cadet, Evidence Custodian Prepared by Molly Schwartzkopf 6/6/2012 Pagel Y"= Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary f R3V , February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 mr E` Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 P' Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000250 02/23/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY GALENA ROAD/ROSENWINKEL STREET ------------------ 2012-00000251 02/23/2012 1150-CREDIT CARD FRAUD 900 BLK. ERICA LANE ------------ -- ----------- 2012-00000252 02/23/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 2800 BLK. CRANSTON CIRCLE - -- --- ­- -- - - 2012-00000253 02/24/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/SYCAMORE ROAD 2012-00000254 02/24/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY W.SOMONAUK STREET/KING STREET 2012-00000255 02/24/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 600 BLK. HAYDEN DRIVE 2012-00000256 02/24/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2012-00000257 02/24/2012 9310-,,CHECK WELL BEING 100 BLK.WILLOUGHBY COURT 2012-00000258 02/24/2012 9071-CITIZEN ASSIST 800 BLK. MORGAN STREET - -- -- -------------------- - 2012-00000259 02/24/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 900 BLK. HEARTLAND DRIVE 2012-00000260 02/24/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 400 BLK. NORWAY CIRCLE 2012-00000261 02/24/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000262 02/24/2012 1811- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 2012-00000263 02/24/2012 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 100 BLK.WILLOUGHBY COURT - ----- ------ - ---- -- ---- 2012-00000264 02/25/2012 2230- ILLEGAL CONSUMPTION 0 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000265 02/25/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 2000 BLK.S.BRIDGE STREET ----------- - ----------------- -- -- 2012-00000266 02/25/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT CENTER PARKWAY/W.000NTRYSIDE PARKWAY 2012-00000267 02/25/2012 0460- BATTERY 200 BILK.W.RIVER STREET 2012-00000268 02/27/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 1300 BLK. CHESTNUT LANE 2012-00000269 02/27/2012 1110- DECEPTIVE PRACTICES 200 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000270 02/27/2012 9610-CITY ORDINANCE VIOLATION ROUTE 47/LANDMARK AVENUE --- - ------- .. - - - ----- --- -- 2012-00000271 02/27/2012 1150-CREDIT CARD FRAUD 1100 BLK.TAUS CIRCLE --- --- ------- --- -- ----------- I- --------------------- 2012-00000272 02/27/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 500 BLK.CENTER PARKWAY 2012-00000273 02/27/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/LANDMARK AVENUE 2012-00000274 02/27/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ISABEL DRIVE 2012-00000275 02/28/2012 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL 1510 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000276 02/28/2012 9061- LOST ARTICLES 500 BLK. OMAHA DRIVE 2012-00000277 02/28/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ISABEL DRIVE 2012-00000278 02/28/2012 9039-OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE 100 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE 2012-00000279 002/28/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2012-00000280 02/28/2012 9008-ASSIST BUSINESS AGENCY 200 BLK.WOLF STREET 2012-00000281 02/29/2012 0460- BATTERY 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000282 02/29/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/CANNONBALL TRAIL - ---- - -------- - - 2012-00000283 02/29/2012 1137 IDENTITY THEFT 1200 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2012-00000284 02/29/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000285 03/01/2012 1811- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS ROUTE 47/KENNEDY ROAD 2012-00000286 03/01/2012 2410- DUI -ALCOHOL ROUTE 126/PENMAN ROAD 2012-00000287 03/01/2012 0460- BATTERY 4500 BLK. CAMDEN LANE 2012-00000288 03/01/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2012-00000289 03/01/2012 0460- BATTERY 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000290 03/01/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT 100 BLK. E.STAGECOACH TRAIL 2012-00000291 03/01/2012 9309- MENTAL CASE-OTHER 2100 BLK. BLUEBIRD LANE 2012-00000292 03/01/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 1 of 13 Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000293 03/01/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 2800 BLK.OLD GLORY DRIVE _... ._. - 2012-00000294 03/01/2012 .0860-RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE ------------- ----- _. -. ------------- ------ 2012-00000295 03/01/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY W.HIGHPOINT ROAD/BUDD ROAD ------ ------ - -- - ---- -- -- -------- - 2012-00000296 03/01/2012 9569-ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 600 BLK. CENTER PARKWAY 2012-00000297 03/02/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 500 BLK.S.MAIN STREET 2012-00000298 03/02/2012 9009-ASSIST SCHOOLS 2300 BLK.AUTUMN CREEK BOULEVARD 2012-00000299 03/02/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY W.SOMONAUK STREET/KING STREET 2012-00000300 ,03/02/2012 1811- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS 400 BLK. NORWAY CIRCLE - - - -- ----------------- -- 2012-00000301 03/03/2012 .8008-ASSIST OSWEGO POLICE DEPT DESK REPORT ------------- ------------------------- 2012-00000302 03/03/2012 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 34/GAME FARM ROAD - - - --------- --- --- -------- - 2012-00000303 03/03/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000304 03/03/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE --------- 2012-00000305 .03/04/2012 ,0625- RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY 1200 BLK.CHESTNUT LANE 2012-00000306 03/05/2012 9562 -ACCIDENT- INJURY KENNEDY ROAD/PRAIRIE MEADOWS DRIVE 2012-00000307 03/05/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2012-00000308 03/06/2012 1562-AGG CRIM SEXUAL ABUSE 100 BLK. COLONIAL PARKWAY - - - -- ------ -- - ----- 2012-00000309 .03/06/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY W.KENDALLD RIVE/CENTER PARKWAY ----------- - 2012-00000310 03/06/2012 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 47/RIVER STREET 2012-00000311 03/07/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT 1400 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET --------------- : - . - --- --- ----------- 2012-00000312 03/07/2012 9564 ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000313 03/07/2012 2170- POSS DRUG EQUIPMENT 700 BLK. GAME FARM,ROAD 2012-00000314 ,03/07/2012 2890-ALL OTHER DISORDERLY COND 200 BLK. E.0OUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY ------ --------------- --------------. - 2012-00000315 03/07/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES DESK REPORT 2012-00000316 03/08/2012 0460- BATTERY 1900 BLK.W.VETERANS PARKWAY -------- - . _ ---- ----- . 2012-00000317 03/08/2012 0460- BATTERY 2000 BLK. MARKETVIEW DRIVE - ------ ------------ ------- ------ --- 2012-00000318 03/08/2012 9071-CITIZEN ASSIST 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000319 03/08/2012 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 900 BLK.GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000320 03/09/2012 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 1500 BLK.ORCHID STREET 2012-00000321 03/09/2012 8041-ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2012-00000322 03/09/2012 8041-ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN ROUTE 47/ROUTE 34 2012-00000323 03/09/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/CANNONBALL TRAIL 2012-00000324 03/09/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY COTTONWOOD TRAIL/DIEHL FARM ROAD 2012-00000325 03/10/2012 .2020- POSS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ROUTE 47/E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE - 2012-00000326 03/10/2012 2410- DUI-ALCOHOL ROUTE 71/COUNTRY HILLS DRIVE 2012-00000327 03/10/2012 9080-TOWED VEHICLE ALICE AVENUE/ALAN DALE LANE 2012-00000328 03/10/2012 2470-NO DRIVER'S LICENSE ROUTE 71/W.HIGHPOINT ROAD 2012-00000329 03/11/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY CANNONBALL TRAIL/ROUTE 47 2012-00000330 03/11/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 300 BLK. E.FOX STREET_ 2012-00000331 03/12/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000332 03/12/2012 9061- LOST ARTICLES 1900 BLK. S.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000333 03/12/2012 9070- DISORDERLY/RECKLESS COND 600 BLK.W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000334 03/12/2012 0460- BATTERY 900 BLK. PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE 2012-00000335 03/12/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 300 BLK.W.RIVER STREET 2of13 q _: Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary " 1\ February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 y�L Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 it�.: E`, Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000336 03/12/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 100 BLK. E.SCHOOLHOUSE ROAD 2012-00000337 03/12/2012 2410- DUI -ALCOHOL ROUTE 71/ROUTE 47 2012-00000338 .03/13/2012 2170- POSS DRUG EQUIPMENT ROUTE 71/HOLLENBACK ROAD 2012-00000339 03/13/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE/ROUTE 47 2012-00000340 '03/13/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 900 BLK. PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE 2012-00000341 03/14/2012 9080-TOWED VEHICLE ROUTE 47/E.VAN EMMON STREET 2012-00000342 03/14/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 600 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000343 03/14/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 300 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000344 03/14/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 500 BLK. BURNING BUSH DRIVE 2012-00000345 03/14/2012 0460- BATTERY 1900 BLK.S.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000346 03/15/2012 1730-CURFEW ROUTE 47/E.SOMONAUK STREET 2012-00000347 03/15/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/CENTER PARKWAY 2012-00000348 03/15/2012 .9915-ASSISTANCE CIVIL CATEGORY 700 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000349 03/15/2012 1563-CRIMINAL SEXUAL ABUSE 1600 BLK. COTTONWOOD TRAIL 2012-00000350 03/15/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 500 BLK. REDHORSE LANE 2012-00000351 03/16/2012 0460- BATTERY 900 BLK. PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE 2012-00000352 03/16/2012 .9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 700 BLK.GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000353 .03/16/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000354 03/09/2012 9005 -ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000355 03/16/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 1000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET _ _ .—- � --- — ----------------- 2012-00000356 03/17/2012 2170- POSS DRUG EQUIPMENT ROUTE 34/ISABEL DRIVE -- --- -- --- ------------------- 2012-00000357 03/17/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/GAME FARM ROAD _._.-- ---------------------- -- -----------_ - 2012-00000358 03/17/2012 0910- MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 300 BLK. E.000NTRYSIDE PARKWAY 2012-00000359 03/17/2012 9004-ASSIST OTHER POLICE DEPT 1500 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET — — ----------.--- 2012-00000360 03/17/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000361 .03/17/2012 9004-ASSIST OTHER POLICE DEPT 100 BLK. COLONIAL PARKWAY ------------ 2012-00000362 03/17/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000363 03/17/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2012-00000364 03/17/2012 2410- DUI-ALCOHOL 200 BLK.W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000365 03/17/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY E.MAIN STREET/ROUTE 47 2012-00000366 03/18/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 500 BLK. PARKSIDE LANE 2012-00000367 03/18/2012 2410- DUI-ALCOHOL ROUTE 34/DIEHL FARM ROAD _--- --- ----- ---- 2012-00000368 03/18/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 1500 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000369 03/19/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.000NTRYSIDE PARKWAY — --- --- - ---- --------- --------------- - 2012-00000370 03/19/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 2012-00000371 03/19/2012 .9068- FOUND BICYCLE 1300 BLK. E.SPRING STREET 2012-00000372 03/19/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000373 03/19/2012 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 71/ROUTE 126 2012-00000374 03/19/2012 2410- DUI -ALCOHOL CANNONBALL TRAIL/BOOMER LANE 2012-00000375 03/20/2012 0410-AGGRAVATED BATTERY 100 BLK. E.SCHOOLHOUSE ROAD 2012-00000376 03/20/2012 9061- LOST ARTICLES 1000 BLK.S.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000377 03/20/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000378 03/21/2012 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL 1200 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 3of13 Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 IT- Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000379 03/21/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 700 BLK.ARROWHEAD DRIVE 2012-00000380 03/21/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000381 03/21/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 900 BLK. PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE 2012-00000382 03/21/2012 9009-ASSIST SCHOOLS 900 BLK. M LL STREET 2012-00000383 03/21/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 2600 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000384 03/21/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 71/IDENTA ROAD 2012-00000385 03/21/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000386 03/21/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 600 BLK. DENISE COURT 2012-00000387 03/22/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 1300 BLK.ORCHID STREET 2012-00000388 03/22/2012 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 47/ROUTE 126 2012-00000389 03/22/2012 9005 -ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000390 03/22/2012 0810_THEFT OVER HONEYSUCKLE LANE/ALAN DALE LANE 2012-00000391 03/22/2012 .9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000392 03/22/2012 5000-ALL OTHER CRIM OFFENSES 600 BLK. DENISE COURT 2012-00000393 03/23/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 1400 BLK.CHESTNUT LANE 2012-00000394 03/23/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/BOOMBAH BOULEVARD 2012-00000395 03/23/2012 .9076-SUBPOENAS/OTHER PAPERS 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 2012-00000396 03/23/2012 0625- RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY 1800 BLK.WALSH DRIVE 2012-00000397 03/23/2012 9068- FOUND BICYCLE 300 BLK.W.KENDALL DRIVE 2012-00000398 03/23/2012 2825- HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE 2700 BLK. HOBBS COURT 2012-00000399 03/24/2012 2220- ILLEGAL POSS ALCOHOL ROUTE 126/IDENTA ROAD 2012-00000400 03/24/2012 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 200 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE 2012-00000401 03/24/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.VAN EMMON STREET 2012-00000402 03/25/2012 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 1400 BLK. CANNONBALL TRAIL 2012-00000403 03/25/2012 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 100 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE 2012-00000404 03/25/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 2012-00000405 03/25/2012 2020- POSS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE SARAVANOS ROAD/TOMMY HUGHES WAY 2012-00000406 03/26/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 800 BLK. HAMPTON LANE 2012-00000407 03/27/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 800 BLK. CANYON TRAIL 2012-00000408 03/27/2012 2060- LICENSED OPERATIONS 100 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000409 .03/27/2012 4387-VIOL ORDER OF PROTECTION 3900 BLK. PRESTON DRIVE 2012-00000410 03/27/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY JOHN STREET/EVERGREEN LANE 2012-00000411 03/28/2012 2170- POSS DRUG EQUIPMENT ROUTE 47/E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2012-00000412 03/28/2012 9071-CITIZEN ASSIST ROUTE 34/ELDAMAIN ROAD 2012-00000413 03/28/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/ROUTE 34 2012-00000414 03/28/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000415 03/28/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000416 03/28/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 1300 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2012-00000417 03/28/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY S.MAIN STREET/W.FOX ROAD 2012-00000418 03/28/2012 9101-SUSPICIOUS AUTO 600 BLK.W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000419 03/29/2012 0610- BURGLARY 400 BLK. E.VAN EMMON STREET 2012-00000420 03/29/2012 1137- IDENTITY THEFT 1000 BLK.AUBURN DRIVE 2012-00000421 03/29/2012 2825- HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE 100 BLK. WILLOUGHBY COURT 4of13 n l Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 6 Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000422 04/04/2012 2825- HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE 300 BLK.W.MAIN STREET 2012-00000423 03/30/2012 2230- ILLEGAL CONSUMPTION 500 BLK. POWERS COURT 2012-00000424 03/30/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 10000 BLK. GALENA ROAD 2012-00000425 03/30/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 700 BLK. EDWARD LANE 2012-00000426 03/30/2012 8041-ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000427 03/31/2012 2020- POSS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE 1300 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2012-00000428 03/31/2012 9428- INVESTIGATION -SUICIDE 3100 BLK. PINEWOOD DRIVE 2012-00000429 03/31/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000430 04/01/2012 2461-OPERATING UNINSURED E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE/HEUSTIS STREET 2012-00000431 04/01/2012 2470- NO DRIVER'S LICENSE ROUTE 47/ROUTE 126 2012-00000432 04/01/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY S.CAN NON BALL TRAIL/BRISTO L RIDGE ROAD 2012-00000433 04/02/2012 1365-CRIM TRESPASS RESIDENCE 1500 BLK. COTTONWOOD TRAIL 2012-00000434 04/02/2012 9569-ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 200 BLK.WOLF STREET 2012-00000435 04/02/2012 2820-TELEPHONE THREAT 500 BLK.W.DOLPH STREET 2012-00000436 04/02/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 100 BLK. E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2012-00000437 04/02/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 100 BLK. E.000NTRYSIDE PARKWAY 2012-00000438 04/02/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000439 04/02/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 1500 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000440 04/03/2012 9936- HARASSING TELEPHONE CALLS 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 2012-00000441 04/03/2012 0460- BATTERY 900 BLK. PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE 2012-00000442 04/03/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000443 04/04/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000444 04/05/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 0 BLK.W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000445 04/05/2012 1811-POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS 700 BLK.GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000446 04/05/2012 0260-CRIMINAL SEXUAL ASSAULT 600 BLK. BRISTOLAVENUE 2012-00000447 04/05/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 400 BLK.W.RIDGE STREET 2012-00000448 04/06/2012 1811- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS 1300 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2012-00000449 04/06/2012 -1811- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS ROUTE 71/VILLAGE VIEW DRIVE 2012-00000450 04/06/2012 2890-ALL OTHER DISORDERLY COND 2100 BLK.ALAN DALE LANE 2012-00000451 04/07/2012 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 47/WALNUT STREET 2012-00000452 04/07/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT ROUTE 71/W.HIGHPOINT ROAD 2012-00000453 04/07/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 400 BLK.SPICEBUSH COURT 2012-00000454 04/07/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY '300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 2012-00000455 04/07/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT GALENA.ROAD/ROUTE 47 2012-00000456 04/08/2012 2220- ILLEGAL POSS ALCOHOL 200 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000457 04/08/2012 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY KENNEDY ROAD/MILL ROAD 2012-00000458 04/08/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 200 BLK. E.SPR NG STREET 2012-00000459 04/08/2012 2890-ALL OTHER DISORDERLY COND 400 BLK. E.MAIN STREET 2012-00000460 04/08/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 100 BLK. COLONIAL PARKWAY 2012-00000461 04/09/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 200 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000462 04/09/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/ROUTE 71 2012-00000463 04/09/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2012-00000464 04/09/2012 1811- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS 4500 BLK. ROSENWINKEL STREET 5of13 Y Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary 0 R February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000465 04/09/2012 9700-VOIDED TICKET/REPORT DESK REPORT 2012-00000466 04/10/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000467 04/10/2012 9008-ASSIST BUSINESS AGENCY 400 BLK. E.000NTRYS DE PARKWAY 2012-00000468 04/10/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 600 BLK.ANDREA COURT 2012-00000469 04/10/2012 0410-AGGRAVATED BATTERY 500 BLK. W.BARBERRY CIRCLE 2012-00000470 04/09/2012 1195- FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION 900 BLK.S.STATE STREET 2012-00000471 .04/11/2012 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 900 BLK.S.MAIN STREET 2012-00000472 :04/10/2012 9060-SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION 100 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE ------ ------- --- . 2012-000. 00473 ;04/11/2012 9309- MENTAL CASE-OTHER 11200 BLK. E.SPRING STREET - -------------------------------------------------------------- --- ------------- ------ 2012-00000474 04/11/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 300 BLK. CHURCH STREET -_ - - ------------------------------------- 2012-00000475 04/11/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT ------------ 2012-00000476 04/11/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY CHURCH STREET/W.MAIN STREET - ------------------ ----- 2012-00000477 04/11/2012 9004-ASSIST OTHER POLICE DEPT 1200 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE -- - ---------------------------- ----- 2012-00000478 04/11/2012 9062- FOUND ARTICLES 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD - ------ --- ----------------- -- 2012-00000479 04/11/2012 4387-VIOL ORDER OF P_R__0_TE_C_ TION 500 BLK. W.BARBERRY CIRCLE --- -- 2012-00000480 04/11/2012 1130- FRAUD 100 BLK. E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2012-00000481 04/11/2012 0625- RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY 500 BLK.W.BARBERRY CIRCLE 2012-00000482 04/11/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY GARRITANO STREET/CAMDEN LANE 2012-00000483 ;04/13/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 800 BLK. PARKSIDE LANE 2012-00000484 04/13/2012 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 47/E.VAN EMMON STREET --------- ----- 2012-00000485 04/13/2012 9431- DEATH -NATURAL CAUSES 1000 BLK.CANARY AVENUE - - ---------- ------- — 2012-00000486 04/13/2012 1811- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 ------ - -- — --- - -- - - - 2012-00000487 .04/13/2012 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 500 BLK. MARTIN AVENUE 2012-00000488 04/16/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000489 04/13/2012 1811- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS ROUTE 47/BEAVER STREET - 2012-00000490 04/14/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY GALENA ROAD/KENNEDY ROAD 2012-00000491 04/14/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 126/ROUTE 71 2012-00000492 04/15/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 200 BLK.WALSH CIRCLE 2012-00000493 04/15/2012 2470- NO DRIVER'S LICENSE ROUTE 34/AUTUMN CREEK BOULEVARD 2012-00000494 04/15/2012 4387-VIOL ORDER OF PROTECTION 1200 BLK.SUNSET AVENUE 2012-00000495 04/15/2012 2470- NO DRIVER'S LICENSE ROUTE 126/ROUTE 47 2012-00000496 04/15/2012 2410- DUI -ALCOHOL ROUTE 47/ROUTE 126 2012-00000497 04/16/2012 9141-ASSIST CPAT DESK REPORT 2012-00000498 04/16/2012 1563-CRIMINAL SEXUAL ABUSE WINCHESTER LANE/HALF MOON DRIVE 2012-00000499 04/17/2012 2170- POSS DRUG EQUIPMENT 200 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE 2012-00000500 04/17/2012 1110- DECEPTIVE PRACTICES 200 BLK. ELIZABETH STREET 2012-00000501 04/17/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 2700_ BLK.CRANSTON CIRCLE 2012-00000502 04/17/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 300 BLK. COLTON STREET 2012-00000503 04/18/2012 1365 -CRIM TRESPASS RESIDENCE 500 BLK. FAIRHAVEN DRIVE 2012-00000504 04/18/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 1400 BLK.ORCHID STREET 2012-00000505 04/18/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 200 BLK.W.KENDALL DRIVE 2012-00000506 04/18/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.MAIN STREET 2012-00000507 04/18/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.SPRINGS TREET 6of13 0 ` , Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 *11 ,`E. Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000508 04/18/2012 1137- IDENTITY THEFT 500 BLK. POWERS COURT 2012-00000509 04/18/2012 0860- RETAILTHEFT 400 BLK. E.000NTRYSIDE PARKWAY 2012-00000510 04/19/2012 1380- UNAUTH POSS WEAPONS 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000511 04/19/2012 1380- UNAUTH POSS WEAPONS 700 BLK. GAME FARM-ROAD 2012-00000512 04/19/2012 1380- UNAUTH POSS WEAPONS 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000513 04/19/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/ROUTE 126 2012-00000514 04/19/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000515 04/19/2012 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000516 04/19/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 2200 BLK. BERESFORD DRIVE 2012-00000517 04/19/2012 0860-RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000518 04/19/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 4600 BLK. PLYMOUTH AVENUE 2012-00000519 04/20/2012 9008-ASSIST BUSINESS AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000520 04/20/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/CANNONBALL TRAIL_ 2012-00000521 04/20/2012 0460- BATTERY 4500 BLK.GARRITANO STREET 2012-00000522 04/20/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.SOMONAUK STREET 2012-00000523 04/20/2012 2420- DUI- DRUGS_ ROUTE 34/ELDAMAIN ROAD 2012-00000524 04/21/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY GALENA ROAD/KENNEDY ROAD 2012-00000525 04/21/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 500 BLK.W.KENDALL DRIVE 2012-00000526 04/21/2012 2825- HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE 2300 BLK. IROQUOIS LANE 2012-00000527 04/21/2012 9062- FOUND ARTICLES 600 BLK. HEUSTIS STREET 2012-00000528 04/21/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2012-00000529 04/22/2012 2220- ILLEGAL POSS ALCOHOL PENMAN ROAD/WREN RO_AD 2012-00000530 04/22/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 400 BLK. E.000NTRYSIDE PARKWAY 2012-00000531 04/22/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/SYCAMORE ROAD 2012-00000532 04/22/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/CENTER PARKWAY 2012-00000533 04/23/2012 18 11- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS ROUTE 47/E.FOX STREET 2012-00000534 04/23/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT 1400 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000535 04/24/2012 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 2200 BLK. NORTHLAND LANE 2012-00000536 04/24/2012 1740- RUNAWAY- MRAI 2300 BLK.SUMAC DRIVE 2012-00000537 04/24/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 400 BLK. E.SOMONAUK STREET 2012-00000538 04/24/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 100 BLK. E.FOX STREET 2012-00000539 04/24/2012 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE_ 900 BLK. S.MAIN STREET 2012-00000540 04/24/2012 8041-ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN 400 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000541 04/24/2012 1150-CREDIT CARD FRAUD 300 BLK.W.SOMONAUK STREET 2012-00000542 04/24/2012 9439- DEATH -OTHER 2100 BLK. MUIRFIELD COURT 2012-00000543 04/24/2012 1563-CRIMINAL SEXUAL ABUSE POPLAR DRIVE/STONY CREEK LANE 2012-00000544 04/24/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000545 04/24/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 100 BLK. APPLETREE COURT 2012-00000546 04/24/2012 0625- RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY 1000 BLK.S.MAIN STREET 2012-00000547 04/25/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 100 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE 2012-00000548 04/25/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/CENTER PARKWAY 2012-00000549 04/25/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 300 BLK. POPLAR DRIVE 2012-00000550 04/25/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 1000 BLK. KATE DRIVE 7of13 Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary K ; w February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 �l.n.:. Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000551 04/25/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 300 BLK. POPLAR DRIVE ------ --- -------------- -------- .2012-00000552 04/25/2012 .9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 1200 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE ------- ----------------------------- --- 2012-00000553 04/26/20129561-ACCIDENT- DEATH KENNEDY ROAD/MCHUGH ROAD ------ --------- -- --------------------------------------- 2012-00000554 04/26/2012 9060-SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION DESK REPORT --------------- ------------------------- - 2012-00000555 04/26/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2012-00000556 04/26/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT --------------------------- 2012-00000557 04/26/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 700 BLK. MORGAN STREET - ------- -- --- _ 11 --- ---- ------------ 2012-00000558 04/27/2012 9569-ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD - _ -------- ----- ------------- --- - ---- 2012-00000559 .04/27/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.VAN EMMON STREET - --------------- --- --- --------------------------------------- 2012-00000560 04/28/2012 2230- ILLEGAL CONSUMPTION W.FOX STREET/WHITE OAK WAY --------------- - ----------------------------- --------------- - 2012-00000561 04/28/2012 9564-ACCIDENT-PROPERTY GALENA ROAD/KENNEDY ROAD -- ------•-- ----------------- ----------- --- 2012-00000562 04/28/2012 0860-RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE -------- ------ - - ---------- ----------------- ---- 2012-00000563 04/29/2012 ,0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 800 BLK. PARKSIDE LANE -- - .. - ---------------- ------ ----------------- 2012-00000564 04/29/2012 2230- ILLEGAL CONSUMPTION 300 BLK.S.STATE STREET - ---------------._.. _. ------- ---- ------------------- 2012-00000565 04/30/2012 9061- LOST ARTICLES 1000 BLK.S.MAIN STREET ------------- ------------ 2012-00000566 05/01/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 300 BLK. POPLAR DRIVE -------------------- ------------------------------------- 2012-00000567 05/01/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ELDAMAIN ROAD --- ----- ------ ------------ 2012-00000568 05/02/2012 1137- IDENTITY THEFT 900 BLK.CANYON TRAIL 2012-00000569 05/02/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 1200 BLK.SUNSET AVENUE 2012-00000570 05/02/2012 '2825-HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE 1900 BLK.WESTON AVENUE --------------------- - - ------------------------------------------ ------ 2012-00000571 05/03/2012 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 1400 BLK.ASPEN LANE --- -------------------- -- -------- ------------------- --------- 2012-00000572 05/03/2012 9009-ASSIST SCHOOLS 3100 BLK. GRANDE TRAIL - ------------ --=------ 2012-00000573 05/03/2012 9060-SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION 200 BLK.WORSLEY STREET ------------------ -- --------------------.. 2012-00000574 05/03/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 700 BLK.GAME FARM ROAD - -------------------------------- 2012-00000575 05/03/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 300 BLK. POPLAR DRIVE ----- -- -- ----------- - ----=------------------------------- ------ 2012-00000576 05/03/2012 2170- POSS DRUG EQUIPMENT 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD - ----�----------- -------------- 2012-00000577 .05/03/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES DESK REPORT - --------------- ----- - -­_---- ------ 2012-00000578 05/03/2012 0625-RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY 200 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE -- ------------------------------- 2012-00000579 05/03/2012 .1305-CRIMINAL DEFACE PROPERTY 100 BLK.COLONIAL PARKWAY ----- - 2012-00000580 05/04/2012 9203 DOG BITE- PUBLIC 100 BLK.APPLETREE COURT --- ----- ------- --- -- ----- --- ----------- -- 2012-00000581 05/04/2012 0260-CRIMINAL SEXUAL ASSAULT DESK REPORT 2012-00000582 05/04/2012 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 34/DIEHL FARM ROAD --- -- ----- -- --------- --------- --- -- -- -------- ------------- -- 2012-00000583 05/04/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/CENTER PARKWAY ---- --- ----- --------- 2012-00000584 05/04/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD --- ----- ------------- 2012-00000585 05/04/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 500 BLK.W.BARBERRY CIRCLE 2012-00000586 05/04/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000587 05/04/2012 9070- DISORDERLY/RECKLESS CO-ND 200 BLK. COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY 2012-00000588 05/04/2012 1330-CRIM TRESPASS REAL PROP 300 BLK. E.PARK STREET 2012-00000589 05/04/2012 1811- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS 100 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE 2012-00000590 05/05/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 1000 BLK. KATE DRIVE 2012-00000591 05/05/2012 0625- RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY 400 BLK. BIRCHWOOD LANE 2012-00000592 05/05/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000593 05/05/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 0 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 8of13 Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary Y February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 LL Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000594 _05/06/2012 9060-SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION 10000 BLK. ROUTE 71 2012-00000595 05/06/2012 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL MCHUGH ROAD/E.SOMONAUK STREET 2012-00000596 05/06/2012 0510-AGGRAVATED ASSAULT 3700 BLK. BAILEY ROAD 2012-00000597 '05/06/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.VAN EMMON STREET - - - ----------- - 2012-00000598 05/06/2012 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 100 BLK. COLONIAL PARKWAY 2012-00000599 05/06/2012 ,2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 47/KENNEDY ROAD 2012-00000600 05/06/2012 2410- DUI-ALCOHOL ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2012-00000601 05/07/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/GAME FARM ROAD - 2012-00000602 05/07/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 300 BLK. E.RIDGE STREET --------- _ -- --------- 2012-00000603 05/07/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE ---------- ---- - ------- --- ---- - ------ 2012-00000604 05/07/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000605 05/08/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY E.SOMONAUK STREET/BRISTOL AVENUE ----- --------- --- --- -- - 2012-00000606 .05/08/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/ROUTE 126 2012-00000607 05/08/2012 9062- FOUND ARTICLES 100 BLK.W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000608 05/08/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000609_05/08/2012 9071-CITIZEN ASSIST 600 BLK.TOWER LANE 2012-00000610 05/08/2012 ,5081- IN-STATE WARRANT 2000 BLK.S.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000611 05/09/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY GALENA ROAD/ROUTE 47 2012-00000612 05/09/2012 9519-ABANDONED VEHICLE MCHUGH ROAD/KENNEDY ROAD — -- - 2012-00000613 05/09/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT DESK REPORT ----------- .-- 2012-00000614 05/09/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT ----- -------- 2012-00000615 ,05/09/2012 0910- MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 100 BLK. COLONIAL PARKWAY ---- -------- 2012-00000616 .05/09/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 3900 BLK. HAVEN HILL COURT 2012-00000617 05/10/2012 2462-OPERATE WITH SUSPEND REG KENNEDY ROAD/BRISTOL RIDGE ROAD 2012-00000618 05/10/2012 0460- BATTERY 900 BLK. PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE -------------------- - ------ ----- ---------- 2012-00000619 05/10/2012 1365-CRIM TRESPASS RESIDENCE 400 BLK.OMAHA DRIVE --- ----- --- ---------- - ----- — --------- 2012-00000620 05/10/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 200 BLK. BOOMBAH BOULEVARD 2012-00000621 05/10/2012 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 100 BLK. E.KENDALL DRIVE 2012-00000622 05/10/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 2200 BLK. BERESFORD DRIVE 2012-00000623 05/10/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/ROUTE 34 2012-00000624 05/10/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE/ROUTE 126 2012-00000625 05/10/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 200 BLK.W.HYDRAULIC AVENUE ------ --- -- 2012-00000626 05/11/2012 2890-ALL OTHER DISORDERLY COND 900 BLK. BLUESTEM DRIVE — - -11 ---------------- -- - - -- ----------------- 2012-00000627 05/11/2012 9569-ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 0 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY - -------- ----------- ---- 2012-00000628 05/11/2012 2890-ALL OTHER DISORDERLY COND 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000629 05/11/2012 9201- DOG BITE- HOME 1200 BLK. E.SPRING STREET 2012-00000630 05/11/2012 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 47/ROUTE 34 2012-00000631 05/11/2012 9212-ANIMAL-SICK/INJURED ROUTE 47/CORNEILS ROAD 2012-00000632 05/12/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 200 BLK.W.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2012-00000633 05/12/2012 2470- NO DRIVER'S_LICENSE GALENA ROAD/CANNONBALL TRAIL 2012-00000634 05/13/2012 0560-ASSAULT 3600 BLK. KENNEDY ROAD 2012-00000635 05/13/2012 9062- FOUND ARTICLES 400 BLK.W.RIDGE STREET 2012-00000636 05/14/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 9of13 Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary K February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 €' Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000637 05/14/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 2200 BLK. BERESFORD DRIVE ----=-------------- -- ----------- --- 2012-00000638 05/14/2012 .2890-ALL OTHER DISORDERLY COND 900 BLK. HOMESTEAD DRIVE - ------- --- -------------------- 2012-00000639 05/14/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE -- - ------ -- ----- -- - 2012-00000640 05/14/2012 0720-THEFT OF VEHICLE PARTS 200 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY - ----------- 2012-00000641 05/14/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 1100 BLK.GOLDFINCH AVENUE 2012-00000642 05/14/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 300 BLK. E.KENDALL DRIVE 20 12-00000 64 3 05/14/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT PARKSIDE LANE/COUNTRY HILLS DRIVE 2012-00000644 05/10/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD ------------ -- -- - - --- ---------------- 2012-00000645 05/15/2012 9071-CITIZEN ASSIST 800 BLK.S.BRIDGE STREET ----------------------------------------------- 2012-00000646 05/15/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 - -------- --- -------------------------------------------- 2012-00000647 .05/15/2012 1710- ENDANGER LIFE OF CHILD 900 BLK. ERICA LANE ---------------------- ------------- 2012-00000648 05/15/2012 5081-IN-STATE WARRANT 200 BLK.W.VETERANS PARKWAY -- ------------- ------ ------------------------ 2012-00000650 05/16/2012 .5081- IN-STATE WARRANT ROUTE 34/AUTUMN CREEK BOULEVARD - - - --- ---- -- --------------------------- 2012-00000651 05/16/2012 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 1000 BLK.AUBURN DRIVE --------------------=-- -- ----------- ------------------------- 2012-00000652 05/16/2012 9428- INVESTIGATION -SUICIDE 1900 BLK.CONEFLOWER COURT ------------------------- -------------------- 2012-00000653 05/17/2012 9065- MISSING -ADULT FEMALE 3700 BLK. BAILEY ROAD - - ---- -------- - --------------- ----------------------------- ----- 2012-00000654 05/17/2012 .1150-CREDIT CARD FRAUD 1800 BLK. MARKETVIEW DRIVE --------- - --------- -- 2012-00000655 .05/17/2012-90-09-ASSIST SCHOOLS 200 BLK.W.SOMONAUK STREET 2012-00000656 05/17/2012 903-ASSIST AMBULANCE 300 BLK. E.VAN EMMON STREET - - -------- -------------------- 2012-00000657 05/18/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD - L---- --------- --- _ _- ------ -- ------------- ... 2012-00000658 05/18/2012 0610- BURGLARY 1200 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET - - --- - ----- --- --------------------------------- 2012-00000659 05/18/2012 9071-CITIZENS ASSIST 600 BLK. CENTER PARKWAY ------------------ ------- -------------------------------------- - 2012-00000660 05/18/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 1200 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET - ------ ----.-- -- - 2012-00000661 05/18/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 1200 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET ----- - --- - ----- ------------ - - 2012-00000662 05/18/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE --- -------------- - ------ 2012-00000663 05/18/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/RIVER STREET -- --- ----------- ---- - - ----------I---------------------- 2012-00000664 05/18/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE - --- ------- ----- --------------- 2012-00000665 05/18/2012 2170- POSS DRUG EQUIPMENT 200 BLK.W.FOX STREET 2012-00000666 05/19/2012 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE .. . -- - ---- - 2012-00000667 05/20/2012 2470- NO DRIVER'S LICENSE ROUTE 34/MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2012-00.000668 05/21/2012 900.1_ -_A_SSIST_ CITY FIRE DEPT 100 BLK. COLONIAL PARKWAY 2012-00000669 05/21/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY_ 1200 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2012-00000670 05/21/2012 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 1000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000671 05/21/2012 1137-IDENTITY THEFT 2200 BLK. BERESFORD DRIVE 2012-00000672 .05/22/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.FOX STREET 2012-00000673 05/22/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 1500 BLK.WALSH DRIVE 2012-00000674 05/22/2012 9569-ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000675 05/22/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROSENWINKEL STREET/BERTRAM DRIVE 2012-00000676 05/22/2012 9569-ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 0 BILK.W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000677 05/22/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 500 BLK.W.BARBERRY CIRCLE 2012-00000678 05/22/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 100 BLK. COLONIAL PARKWAY 2012-00000679 05/23/2012 2820-TELEPHONE THREAT 400 BLK. WINTERBERRY DRIVE 2012-00000680 05/23/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 100 BLK.COLONIAL PARKWAY 10 of 13 ` Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 'I°� Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 r ' a Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000681 05/23/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT 200 BLK. DICKSON COURT - -- ----------- ---- 2012-00000682 05/23/2012 2220- ILLEGAL POSS ALCOHOL 200 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000683 05/24/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY ROUTE 47/GALENA ROAD 2012-00000684 05/24/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/BOOMBAH BOULEVARD 2012-00000685 05/24/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 126/ROUTE 71 2012-00000686 05/24/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2012-00000687 05/24/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/13OOMBAH BOULEVARD 2012-00000688 .05/24/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 900 BLK. PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE 2012-00000689 05/24/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.FOX STREET -- --- -------- ------------ --- - -- 2012-00000690 05/24/2012 9001-ASSIST CITY FIRE DEPT 1100 BLK. E.SPRING STREET 2012-00000691 05/24/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 2600 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET -------- -------- ----------- y 2012-00000692 ,05/24/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 200 BLK. DICKSON COURT ------------------ - ---------------------- . 2012-00000693 .05/25/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 2200 BLK. BERESFORD DRIVE ------- ----------------- ---- - - - --- ----- -- ---- - 2012-00000694 05/25/2012 1811- POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS 100 BLK.W.FOX STREET -- --------------------- 2012-00000695 05/25/2012 0460- BATTERY 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD ----- ------- 2012-00000696 05/25/2012 9564-ACCIDENT-PROPERTY BOOMBAH BOULEVARD/ROUTE 47 ----- ------- -------- — ------ --- 2012-00000697 05/25/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE - - 2012-00000698 ,05/25/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000699 05/25/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/S.MAIN STREET --- ---------- - -- —------------------....-- --- -- 2012-00000700 05/26/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 1200 BLK.SUNSET AVENUE a --- —-------------------- 2012-00000701 05/26/2012 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY 8400 BLK. ROUTE 34 2012-00000702 05/26/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY W.FOX ROAD/WHITE OAK WAY ------- - -----.-_.._.---- 2012-00000703 05/26/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 200 BLK. E.SPRING STREET 2012-00000704 05/27/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 400 BLK. FAIRHAVEN DRIVE 2012-00000705 05/27/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 200 BLK. FAIRHAVEN DRIVE 2012-00000706 05/27/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 200 BLK. FAIRHAVEN DRIVE 2012-00000707 05/27/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 300 BLK. FAIRHAVEN DRIVE 2012-00000708 05/27/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 300 BLK. FAIRHAVEN DRIVE 2012-00000709 05/26/2012 9062- FOUND ARTICLES 2000 BLK.S.BRIDGE STREET 2012-00000710 05/27/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 200 BLK. BURNETT STREET 2012-00000711 05/27/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2012-00000712 05/27/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY GALENA ROAD/KENNEDY ROAD 2012-00000713 05/27/2012 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 34/SYCAMORE ROAD 2012-00000714 05/27/2012 5081- IN-STATE WARRANT ROUTE 34/SYCAMORE ROAD 2012-00000715 05/28/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 100 BLK. COLONIAL PARKWAY 2012-00000716 05/28/2012 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 300 BLK. ESSEX COURT 2012-00000717 05/28/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 500 BLK. BUCKTHORN COURT 2012-00000718 05/28/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY HEUSTIS STREET/E.VAN EMMON STREET 2012-00000719 05/25/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000720 05/29/2012 8041-ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN ROUTE 34/N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000721 05/29/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 3600 BLK. KENNEDY ROAD 2012-00000722 05/29/2012 2825 - HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000723 05/29/2012 0470- RECKLESS CONDUCT 900 BLK. PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE 11 of 13 Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 iL Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000724 05/29/2012 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 500 BLK. FAIRHAVEN DRIVE 2012-00000725 05/29/2012 9061- LOST ARTICLES 1300 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2012-00000726 05/29/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 4500 BLK.WINCHESTER LANE 2012-00000727 05/29/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2012-00000728 05/29/2012 0460- BATTERY 3100 BLK. GRANDE TRAIL 2012-00000729 05/29/2012 2890-ALL OTHER DISORDERLY CON 1200 BLK.TAUS CIRCLE 2012-00000730 05/29/2012 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 1600 BLK.SHETLAND LANE 2012-00000731 05/30/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000732 05/30/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 400 BLK. E.000NTRYSIDE PARKWAY 2012-00000733 05/30/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY __ALAN DALE LANE/MCMURTRIE COURT 2012-00000734 05/30/2012 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 34/DIEHL FARM ROAD 2012-00000735 05/30/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 126/ROUTE 47 2012-00000736 05/30/2012 ,5081- IN-STATE WARRANT 200 BLK.W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000737 05/31/2012 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 34/CANNONBALL TRAIL 2012-00000738 05/31/2012 9062- FOUND ARTICLES 500 BLK.YELLOWSTONE LANE 2012-00000739 05/31/2012 1130- FRAUD 100 BLK.W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000740 05/31/2012 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 900 BLK. HEARTLAND DRIVE 2012-00000741 05/31/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 126/ROUTE 71 2012-00000742 06/01/2012 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 47/COLONIAL PARKWAY 2012-00000743 06/01/2012 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY KENNEDY ROAD/CHRISTY LANE 2012-00000744 06/01/2012 1130- FRAUD 800 BLK. PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE 2012-00000745 06/01/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000746 06/01/2012 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 1500 BLK.STONERIDGE CO_ URT 2012-00000747 06/01/2012 2820-TELEPHONE THREAT 600 BLK.ANDREA COURT 2012-00000748 06/01/2012 0810-THEFT OVER 500 BLK.W.KENDALL DRIVE 2012-00000749 06/01/2012 9205 -OTHER ANIMAL BITES-HOME 1000 BLK. DALTON AVENUE 2012-00000750 06/01/2012 2470- NO DRIVER'S LICENSE 0 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2012-00000751 06/02/2012 9062- FOUND ARTICLES 700 BLK.GAME FARM ROAD 2012-00000752 06/02/2012 2470- NO DRIVER'S LICENSE ROUTE 71/BUDD ROAD 2012-00000753 06/02/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 400 BLK.W.WASHINGTON STREET 2012-00000754 06/03/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 800 BLK. PARKSIDE LANE 2012-00000755 ,06/03/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 800 BLK. PARKSIDE LANE 2012-00000756 06/03/2012 0460- BATTERY FREEMONT STREET/E.PARK STREET 2012-00000757 06/04/2012 2230- ILLEGAL CONSUMPTION ROUTE 47/ROSENWINKEL STREET 2012-00000758 06/04/2012 0610- BURGLARY 100 BLK.W.FOX STREET 2012-00000759 06/04/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000760 06/04/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 126/11OUTE 47 2012-00000761 06/04/2012 9071-CITIZEN ASSIST 300 BLK.WALTER STREET 2012-00000762 06/04/2012 2220-ILLEGAL POSS ALCOHOL ROUTE 47/E.MAIN STREET 2012-00000763 06/04/2012 9158- REG SEX OFFENDER CONTACT SUNFLOWER COURT/WALSH DRIVE 2012-00000764 06/04/2012 2170- POSS DRUG EQUIPMENT 100 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE 2012-00000765 06/04/2012 9103-SUSPICIOUS PERSON 4400 BLK.TAMPA DRIVE 2012-00000766 06/05/2012 0820-THEFT UNDER 2200 BLK.TREMONT AVENUE 12 of 13 4 y Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary February 23, 2012 through June 5, 2012 Report #12-0250 to #12-0773 Report# Date Offense Location 2012-00000767 06/05/2012 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2012-00000768 06/05/2012 9569-ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2012-00000769 06/05/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/GALENA ROAD 2012-00000770 06/05/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/CANNONBALLTRAIL 2012-00000771 06/05/2012 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY CENTER PARKWAY/ROUTE 34 2012-00000772 06/05/2012 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY. 200 BLK. E.SPRING STREET 2012-00000773 06/05/2012 .9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 2100 BLK. MUIRFIELD COURT 13 of 13 Waubonsee Community College Rt. 47 at Waubonsee Drive Sugar Grove, Il 60554 April.15,.2012 Chief Richard Hart Yorkville Police Department 804 Game Farm Road Yorkville,IL 60560 Dear Chief Hart: My name is Dan Sirek and I am a student at Waubonsee Community College in Sugar Grove, Illinois. I am majoring in Criminal Justice. On Feburary 9`h,I interviewed Detective Jahn Hunter as part of an assignment for my Juvenile Justice class. During our discussion,Detective Hunter explained his job function with your department, including his personal background,work hours,types of cases he handles, and the kids he deals with. It was a great experience to interview Detective Hunter. I learned many things from talking to him about the important work he does for your department. Thank you for allowing me to interview Detective Hunter, and please extend my thanks and appreciation to him as well. This was an eye-opening experience that I will remember for a long time. Sincerely, Joe Heinrich �r Dan Sirek Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice WAUBONS EE - COMMUNITY COLLEGE cc: Mr. Joe Heinrich Rt.47 at Waubonsee Drive (630)466-7900,ext.2551 Sugar Grove,IL 60554 (630)466-9102 fax www.waubonsee.edu iheinrich@waubonsee.edu �o��g W ITH ph,O� V i ll a e o f Manhattan = Police Department MANHATTAN,ILLINOIS Incorporated in 1886 245 South State Street, P.O. Box 31, Manhattan, Illinois 60442 Phone: (815) 478-4408 o Fax: (815)478-5948 * 24-Hour Phone: (815)478-3226 February 14, 2012 Chief Richard Hart Yorkville Police Department 804 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Dear Rich, I would like to commend your Deputy Chief Donald Schwartzkopf for the help he provided me. As you are aware I was appointed Police Chief of the Manhattan Police Department on December 27, 2011. Since that date I had to reach out to Don in reference to my being out of compliance as to the Mandatory Fire Arms Qualification per the Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board. This happened because of my date of hire. I had to become qualified quickly by an Illinois Law Enforcement Training and Standards Board State Certified Range Instructor. I contacted Don and asked him if there was any way he could assist me in becoming qualified as quickly as possible. He advised me that he would be more than happy to assist me and made it possible to be certified within less than a week after my request. I want to thank you for allowing Don to provide me with his expertise in area of Range Instructor. Don is truly an asset of the Yorkville Police Department, and the United City of Yorkville. You can be very proud of his dedication,knowledge, his ability and willingness to reach out and assist others like me. It is truly comforting to know that you and your employees would take the time and patients to help other smaller agencies without this expertise. Oh, on a side note thanks to Don I shot a lot better than I ever have in my career as a Law Enforcement Officer. Again, I thank you and if I can ever be of assistance to either you or your agency please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincer , Harol O. Martin III Chief of Police Manhattan Police Department 245 South State Street Manhattan, Illinois 60442 (630) 742-4530 Cell (815) 418-2121 Office (815) 478-5948 Fax hmartin(avilla�),reofmanhattan.or,i� oOs WITRP% �e R, Village o f Manhattan = Police Department MANHATTAN,ILLINOIS Incorporated in 1886 245 South State Street, P.O. Box 31, Manhattan, Illinois 60442 Phone: (815) 478-4408 • Fax: (815)478-5948 • 24-Hour Phone: (815)478-3226 February 14, 2012 Chief Richard Hart Yorkville Police Department 804 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Dear Rich, I would like to commend your Administrative Assistant Molly Schwartzkopf for the help she has provided me. As you are aware I was appointed Police Chief of the Manhattan Police Department on December 27, 2011. Since that date I have contacted Molly a number of times requesting assistance in numerous administrative areas. Each and every time Molly has provided me with the information and/or assistance I have needed to complete my task here. She has always gone above and beyond my requests, which has made my transition here at Manhattan extremely successful. I want to thank you for allowing Molly to provide me with her expertise in the area of Ad� inistration. Molly is truly an asset to the Yorkville Police Department, and the United City of Yorkville. You can be very proud of her dedication and knowledge, and her ability to reach out and assist others like me. It is truly comforting to know that you and your employees would take the time and patients to help other smaller agencies without this expertise. Again I thank you and if ever I can be of assistance to either you or your agency please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerel Harol O. Martin III Chief of Police Manhattan Police Department 245 South State Street Manhattan, Illinois 60442 (630) 742-4530 Cell (815) 418-2121 Office (815) 478-5948 Fax hmartingvilla�,)-eofmanhattan.or.!z F � Special Olympics Illinois Starved Rock/Area 16 Special Olympics Illinois Starved Rock/Area 16 Special Olympics Illinois State Headquarters 1718 Peoria St.,Ste.3-Peru,IL 61354 605 East Willow Street•Normal,IL 61761-2682 815-220-8128•Fax 815-220-8150 309-888-2551 •Fax 309-888-2570 cdepaepe@soill.oig www.soill.org March 9, 2012 Chief Rich Hart Yorkville Police Department 804 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Dear Chief Hart, The Special Olympics Illinois Polar Plunge was held on Sunday,March 4, 2012, at Loon Lake in Silver Springs State Park, Yorkville. 282 individuals braved the cold to take the plunge. They raised $81,622 to date to benefit Special Olympics Illinois athletes. Barry Groesch and Greg Sibenaller,retired Yorkville Police officers, and Cindy Brittenham and John Angelo of the Yorkville Citizen's Police Alumni were awesome! They did a fantastic job of preparing the plunge site at Silver Springs State Park and the parking at the Kendall County Fairgrounds. They are a pleasure to work with throughout the year as members of the Polar plunge Committee. Their organization and access to needed equipment, supplies and volunteers were instrumental in the success of the event. Thank you SO MUCH for supporting involvement to make the 2012 Special Olympics Polar Plunge a success. We hope to work with the Yorkville Police Department at the 2013 Plunge. Your continued support of our Special Olympics programs for individuals with intellectual disabilities is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, N&A13 Cheryl De Paepe Area Director Special Olympics Created by the Joseph P.Kennedy,Jr.Foundation. Special Olympics Illinois,Inc.Authorized and Accredited by Special Olympics,Inc.for the Benefit of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. Special Olympics Illinois Starved Rock/Area 16 Special Olympics Illinois Starved Rock/Area 16 Special Olympics Illinois State Headquarters 1718 Peoria St.,Ste.3 •Peru,IL 61354 605 East Willow Street•Normal,IL 61761-2682 815-220-8128•Fax 815-220-8150 309-888-2551 •Fax 309-888-2570 cdepaepe@a soill.org ivww.soill.org April 3, 2012 Deputy Chief Larry Hilt Yorkville Police Department 804 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Dear Deputy Chief Hilt, The Special Olympics Illinois Polar Plunge was held on Sunday, March 4, 2012, at Loon Lake in Silver Springs State Park, Yorkville. 282 individuals braved the cold to take the plunge. They raised $81,622 to date to benefit Special Olympics Illinois athletes. Thank you for allowing us to borrow the traffic cones. They were very helpful in arranging the entry/exit for the plungers. We greatly appreciate your support of our Special Olympics programs for individuals with intellectual disabilities. We hope to work with the Yorkville Police Department at the 2013 Plunge. N Sincerely, S Cheryl De Paepe Area Director Special Olympics Created by the Joseph P.Kennedy,Jr.Foundation. Special Olympics Illinois,Inc.Authorized and Accredited by Special Olympics,Inc.for the Benefit of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. Laner Muchin Dombrow Becker Levin and Tominberg, I.td. March 22, 2012 Mr. Rich Hart Chief of Police Yorkville Police Department 804 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Dear Rich: At Laner Muchin, we strive to provide the highest quality labor and employment counseling and representation to our employer clients. In this regard, we are proud that Joe Gagliardo, the Firm's Managing Partner and Chair of the Litigation Department, has been named as one of the Top 10 Illinois Super Lawyers for 2012, as published in Chicago Magazine. The Firm appreciates and looks forward to your continued trust, confidence and friendship. Sincerely Laner, Muchin, Dombrow, Becker Levin and Tominberg, Ltd. MlVk-t,tiuitc 2800 ( hicago.Illilmi-I)O i t- Hutt; Plume• i 12. :(r.`800 F;tx i l 2 lancrmuch ill.c nm Su er Lawyem p . 2012 ILLINOISHeneghan,Patrick J.,Schop'K'".erss Chi,-,go Ropski,Gary M.,Brnks Hofer:;itswn Done,Crucago THE TOP 100 Hilliard,David C.,Pat-,:shall M,Ati iffe fJec,hu y Hilliard r. Rosenfeld,Howard H. Rosenfdcl Hafrbn Shapcc 1. Geraldson.Chicago Farmer.Chicago. Jepson,Jr.,Edward C.,vecick•Pi Chicago Robert,Mark L.,SR°tler Duffy a Rotert,Chicani. An alphabetical listing of the lawyers who received the highest John,Peter C.,Williams Mon tgomeiy r.John,Chicago Rubin,James L,Better Rubin S Wiielli?:B,ryd,Chic-rgo point totals in the Illinois Super Lawyers 2012 nomination, Johnson,William V.,Johnson&Bell,c-nicagn Salpeter,Alan N.,Derey �eP3,ruf,Chicago research and blue ribbon review process Klein,Daniel A.,l.urasch'I' Klein.Chicago Sarasek,Peter A.,::_iaites�N Bradv,Ch sago Kraus,Kenneth E,i'rausFlammg,Chicago Schatz,Barry A.,Berger I Schanz,Chicago Abrahamson,Vicki Lafer,`braha nsnn'Voiach;k n Laurie,Ty D.,Laurie 8 Brennan,Chicago Schiller,Donald C.,Schiller DuCinto&Ftere,Chicago Levinson,Chicago Leech,Michael J.,Hinshaw&Culbertson,Chita:Jo Schwartz,Esther Joy,7lellato t Sthe:artz.(=hic�go Adelman,Howard L.,Adelman&Gettlenian Chicano Levinson,Kenneth H.,Joseph Lichten aein&Levinson, Shapiro,Stephen M.,Player Brown,Chicago Anderson,Kimball R.,Viiris:on Sti av,n,Chicago Chicago Siegel,Marc J.,C,iffaielli 3 Siegel.Chicago Ashley,Anthony J.,Vedder arice,Chicago Levy,David H.,Berger I Schatz,Chicago Sklarsky,Charles,lenner&Block,Chicago Baker,Pamela,�,NR Denton.Chicago Lupel,Warren,Much Shelist,Chicago Slater,Paul E.,Sperling F Stater,Chicago Barliant,Ronald,Goldberg Kohn,Chicago Macey,Eric N.,Novack and Macey,Chicago Smith,Todd A.,Pov er Rogers 1,Smith,Chicago Baugher,Peter V.,Schouf z Weiss,Chicago Manzo,Edward D.,Husch Biackwetl,Chicago Spears,Natalie J.,SNP Denton,Chicago Beck,Philip S.,Baittit Reck Herman Pafenchar 3 Scott, Mascherin,Terri L.,Jenner&Block,Chicago Chicago Sprayregen,James H.M.,Kirkland&Ellis,Chicago Melbinger,Michael S.,Winston&Strawn,Chicago Beermann,Miles N.,Beerniann Pri[ikin Mirabelli is Stein,Steven G.M.,Stein Ray,Chicago S.^:et;Jlova,Chicago Miller,Laura Beth,Brinks Hofer Gitson&Lione,Chicago Stone,Jeffrey E.,M,-Derrnott Witt x Emery.Ch i-ago Bell,John W.,Johnson&Bell,Chicago Moto,Steven F.,MoloLamken,Chicago Stucker,Robert J.,Vedder Price,Chicago Berger,Michael J.,Berger I Schatz,Chicago Montgomery,C.Barry,ddithams Muntgomery&John, Sullivan,Thomas P.,lenner&Block,Chicago, Chicago Berkeley,Jill 8.,Neat Gerber&Eisenberg,Chicago Towbin,Steven B.,Shan.GIKSiS Fishman Glantz Nemeroff,David B.,Nemeroff La.v Offices Chicago Wolfson&Towbin.Chicago Buckley,Jr.,Francis X.,Thompson Coburn,Chicago Novack,Stephen.Novack and Macey,Chicago Butter,Jr.,John(Jack)Wm.,Skadden Arps State Valukas,Anton R.,Jenner, Blo:k,Chicano Novak Theodore J. faaaghei&Flcon,Chicago , ,DLA Piper.Chico*�� Warnecke,Michael O.,Perkins Ccie,Chicago Chapman,Richard H.,Clark Hill,Cnicaqo Peterson,Ronald R.,Jenner&Block,Chicago Webb,Dan K.,'Ninston&Strawn,Chicago Clifford,Robert A..Clifford Lavi Offices,Chicago Pfaff,Bruce R.,Pfaff&Gill,Chicago Weiss,Steven A.,Schopf 3 Weiss,Chicago) Cole,Thomas A.,Sidley Au,tin,Chic.igo Pope,Michael A.,McDei mott'dVill&Emery,Ch cago Wolf,Charles B.,Veudei Price,Chicago Conway,Kevin J.,Cooney&Conway,Chicago' Power,Jr.,Joseph A.,Power Rogers&Smith,Chicago Yi,Theodore I.,CJuai les ,.Brady,Chicago Corboy,Jr.,Philip Harnett,Corboy&Demetrio,Chicago Prendergast,Jr.,Richard J.,P,ichaid J.Prendergast, Zavett,Errol,Davis Friedman,Chicago Chicago Daley,Susan J.,Perkins Coie,Chicago Rathsack,Michael W,Attorney at Law,Chicago DeBofsky,Mark D.,Daley DeBofsky,Brvant,Chicago Reidy,Daniel E.,Jones Day,Chicago Demetrio,Michael K.,Cot bo &Demetrio,Chicago Romanucci,Antonio M.,Romanucci 8 Blandin,Chicago Demetrio,Thomas A.,Corboy&Demetrio,Chicago Roper,Harry J.,lenner&Block Chicago Donohue,Richard H.;Donohue Browr filathe.fson& Smyth,Chicago Durkin,Thomas M.,Player Brown,Chicago Eaton,J.Timothy,Shef,ky&Froelich,Chicago Elden,Gary M.,Crippo e,Elden,Chicago Enright,Karen A.,`Alinters Ent iaht Satzetta&O'Bi ien, Chicago � ■ Fisher,fan H.,Sc nopf t'.ieiss,ChicagD Fishman,Robert M.,Shaw Gussis Fishman Glint- Olotfsor f:To ;bin,Chicago Forde,Kevin M.,Kevin M.Fnrie,CMeaclo ADELMAN,HOWARD L. POWER,JR.,JOSEPH A. Adelman&GettLeman,Chicago •3rd Top Point Getter Franczek,Jr.,James C..R anc-z.k kadelat,Chicayr, d Freeman,Louis S.,Skadden Arps Slatri Meagher?. on BECK,PHILIP S. Power Rogers&Smith,Chicago C mcayo Bandit Beck Herman Pafenchar&Scott,Chicago SPRAYREGEN,JAMES H.M. Gagliardo,Joseph M.,Laner Muchin CLIFFORD,ROBERT A. Kirkland&Ellis,Chicago Dombrow Becker Levin&Tominberg, •Top Point Getter• STONE,JEFFREY E. Chicago Clifford Law Offices,Chicago McDermott Will&Emery,Chicago Gifford,Geoffrey L. Pi,aior. G Ic:rd.Cliicaga DEMETRIO;THOMAS A. TOWBIN,STEVEN B. Goldstein,A.Jay. ron,ux n Coburn,Ch iacio Corboy&Demetrio,Chicago Shaw Gussis Fishman Glantz Wolfson&Towbin, Grayson,E.Lynn,lenner -.Mon c k h-ca€ir, GAGLIARDO,JOSEPH M. Chicago Griffin,Hugh C.,Hall Pramglr y,S,.hoonvE_•Id,(hir ag,, Lane Muchin Domb.row Becker Levin WEBB,DAN K. &Toinberg Chicago •2ndTopPointGetter• Harrison,Louis 5, l+ai r rson>:f+ ;rJ Cruta o m ' Winston&Strawn,Chicago Hartmann,H.Michael Lpyd g Voit:y I,la:rr,C hitaur• Healy,Jr.,Martin Tho-!eaFy Lai,?;rin,Chicago Reprinted from the special advertising section in the February 2012 issue of Chicago magazine and the February 2012 issue of Illinois Super Lawyers magazine. ©2012 Super LowyeW,a Thomson Reuters business.All rights reserved. KENDALL COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL 802 JOHN ST. Yorkville, IL 60560 JA-7 /a o i iit �O pF KROALL Phone: (630)553-9256 1 � fax: (630)553-1615 +- F JAY J C� pci . January 24, 2012 Dear Chief Richard T. Hart, I would like to take this opportunity to introduce myself. My name is Anna Payton and I am the Warden for Kendall County Animal Control (KCAC). I may have already met you at the County Operations Committee Meeting on January 11, 2012. One of the goals of Kendall County Animal Control is to a have good working relationship with all law enforcement agencies within the County. By working together we will be able increase efficiency and provide the best service possible to the citizens of Kendall County. I have enclosed a revised copy of Kendall County Animal Control's Policies and Procedures as reference for your department. Please read through it thoroughly and let me know if you have any questions. Kendall County Animal Control will gladly provide officers assistance over the phone when needed or in person, upon the department's request. In addition,KCAC will provide any animal related training for your agency including safe animal handling and animal law,upon request. Thank you for your time and I look forward to working with you! Sinc rely, Anna Payton Animal Control Warden Kendall County Animal Control Kendall County niECOt uFT1�;"nu Animal Control Anna Payton Warden 802 West John Street Yorkville, IL 60560 P: 630.553.7500 ext: 3204 apayton @co.kendall.il.us www.co.kendall.il.us KENDALL COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL Policies and Procedures—For Internal Use Only Kendall County Animal control is currently open to the public 28 hours per week, Monday through Saturday. While open, the public may view and adopt animals, owner surrender dogs, purchase registration tags, and other Animal Control related business. Animal control hours for the public are: Monday–Tuesday, Thursday-Friday 10:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Saturday 9:30a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Animal control operating hours are: Monday–Friday 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.; 1:30 p.m.to 5:30 p.m. Saturday 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. Sunday 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.; Vary While staff and volunteers provide care on Wednesday and Sunday,there are no regularly scheduled hours for the public on Wednesdays or Sundays. The phones at Animal Control are answered on Wednesdays but not on Sundays. The Animal Control Warden will make certain that staff is in no later than 8:30 a.m. each morning to attend to the animals. At any given time,Animal Control has limited staff that is available to go out and collect animals. Therefore, it is the policy of the Kendall County Animal Control: • To respond to calls pertaining to animals in unincorporated Kendall County. Animal Control will respond to calls in town upon the police department's request for assistance. • To pick up animals from police holding facilities within 24 hours of notification. • To pick up confined dogs in unincorporated Kendall County. For the purpose of this policy, "confined" shall mean held in a reasonably small area, such as a garage, barn or fenced in yard, or held with a rope or leash. Animal Control does not pick up cats. • To respond to dogs running at large in unincorporated Kendall County in emergency situations. Emergency calls for assistance are defined on page 3. • To not pick up animals from surrendering owners. The Animal Control Warden and/or the Assistant Animal Control Warden will be available 24 hours a day to answer LIFE THREATENING EMERGENCY CALLS!! 1 Within City Limits: Police departments are responsible for complaints within city limits as Animal Control currently does not have enforcement powers and thus cannot issue citations as needed. In addition Animal Control has limited staff and cannot patrol 24 hours a day. If a resident has found a dog within city limits,the police may transport the dog to Animal Control or to their police holding facility. Animal Control will pick up animals from police holding facilities within 24 hours of notification. The resident may also bring the animal to Animal Control during our business hours. (For after hours procedures,please see page 3.) Animal Control will offer guidance over the phone as needed and will assist police departments upon request. Police departments should only request an assist for calls that cannot be handled by standard equipment or basic knowledge. Emergency calls for assistance are defined on page 3. Unincorporated Kendall County: When possible,the collection of a confined animal shall take place as soon as the staff becomes aware of the animal. However,because Animal Control operates with a very small staff which is supplemented by volunteers, it is not always possible to immediately collect an animal. If the animal is not hostile and if it is confined,then it is reasonable to request that the animal be brought to Animal Control or that the animal be held for a period of time, until the Warden or Assistant Warden is free to collect the animal. This period of time should not exceed two hours, if the call comes during Animal Control's operating hours. If the call comes in after hours,pick up will be approximately 9:00 a.m. the next morning. The exception to the rule on confinement shall come in the case of an injured dog or dangerous animal. For the purpose of this policy, "dangerous animal" shall mean an animal that poses an immediate threat to the public. When alerted to the location of a dog that has a life threatening injury or a dangerous animal,the Animal Control staff will make every effort to assist in containing the animal as well as identifying and notifying the owner of that animal. If the dog is a stray, then the Warden or the Assistant Warden shall make an immediate decision as to the animal's disposition. This decision will be made with the assistance of a veterinarian when possible. There will be no expenditure on medical assistance to an injured stray in the excess of$150.00 and the injured stray animal may be immediately euthanized at the advice of a veterinarian. Pickups (DOGS ONLY)will be between 9:OOa.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday—Friday • A resident cannot expect to get service when calling at 4:45 pm or later. • Residents may bring stray animals found in Kendall County to Animal Control during our business hours. No citizen is permitted to drop off animals at our facility when staff is not present. 2 After hours: Please remember that Animal Control staff is on call for emergencies only. If a resident has found a dog after hours within city limits,police may transport the dog to the kennels in Animal Control's garage. KenCom will dispatch the garage code to the responding officer. The officer may then pull their vehicle into the garage, unload the dog, and fill out some brief paperwork before leaving. Insure there is only one dog per kennel with the exception that a litter of puppies (with or without the nursing mother). No animal may be left in the outdoor kennels. If a resident has found a dog after hours in unincorporated Kendall County, please request that they keep the animal contained at their residence until the following morning. At that time the dog may be picked up by Animal Control or the resident may bring it to our facility if staff is present. If the animal is injured,please inform KenCom so they can contact Animal Control immediately. If the injury is life threatening, transport the animal to VCA Aurora, 2600 W. Galena Blvd in Aurora, and Animal Control will meet you there. If the injury is not life threatening (i.e. dog is limping), transport the animal the kennels in Animal Control's garage and make note of the injury on the paperwork. Do not tell people to turn the animal loose as it can become a safety hazard for the public. Emergency Calls for Assistance are defined as: • Hit By Car(not deceased!) or other serious injury • Animal involved in an arrest or crime scene • Animals in Eviction (during normal hours) • Dog Bite needing assistance (Only if owner is not known) • Dangerous animal that poses an immediate threat to the public Non-Emergency Calls receive prompt but not immediate service We do understand that each call is a priority; however the public needs to be aware that we do not have enough staff to patrol 24 hours a day. Anna Payton (Warden) Laura Pawson (Asst. Warden) (630) 816-0221 Cell (630)816-0218 Cell 3 Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Traffic Safety 1340 North 9th Street/P.O. Box 19245 /Springfield, Illinois/62794-9245 February 16,2012 YORKVILLE POLICE 804 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Attn: Richard Hart Dear Law Enforcement Official: Thank you for your participation in the Illinois Traffic Stop Study. Listed below you will find the current number of traffic stops YORKVILLE POLICE has submitted to IDOT as of February 9th, 2012. Please contact me if you find any discrepancies with the numbers listed below. Month Traffic Stops Submitted January 269 February 185 March 297 April 195 May 186 June f 169 July 168 August 144 September 192 October 142 November 282 December 219 Total: 2448 In order to be in compliance for 2011,your agency must submit all of your 2011 traffic stop information to IDOT by March 1�`, 2012. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 217/785-2364 or at Suzanne.Mvers @illinois.eov. Note: According to the law,your agency must collect and submit traffic stop information until July 1, 2015. Sincerely, Suzie Myers Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Traffic Safety KENComXenom Public Safety Disyatc�C 110 Cornelllan.e, yor�viCCe, IC1lzois 60560 Phone (630).553-0-911 EMERGENCY Fax (630) 553-9411 COMMUNICATIONS POLICE-FIRE-EMS RE: Annual 9-1-1 Call Handling Renewal Notice Date: December 7th,2011 Dear Public Safety Official: In 1989 The County of Kendall with PSAPS located in Yorkville filed with the Illinois Commerce Co nmi s-si6ii lot the authority-to operat6 ari-Enhance'd.9-1-1 System.,ThOCC granted authority for these PSAPS to operate under Order# 89-0157, and the system was cut-over on Aprif I; 1992, In the process ofpreparing the application for-this service;we executed a call- handling agreement with your agency which was forwarded to the ICC and remains on file. This agreement addressed how a misdirected 9-1-1 call would be routed to your agency and how emergency service would be provided for responding to out of jurisdiction calls. By requirement of law, each year we must notify you in writing that we plan to continue E9-1-1 services and that these call handling agreements will remain in effect. a Please be notified that it is our intention to continue to operate the Kendall County E9-1-1 System and-to keep the previously executed call handling agreements in force: We will assume- that unless you advise us in writing within 30 days of the date of notice, that you have no objections to the continuation of this agreement. This letter shall constitute notice to both the participating and adjacent public safety agencies as required. To keep our records current if you would please sign the enclosed agreement and sretum it I would sincerely-appreciate-it We appreciate your cooperation in this matter and look forward to the continued good working relationship we have experienced through the years. If you have any questions regarding this notice please feel free to contact me. Dave Farris Director of Communications, Kendall County ETSB enc cc:file AGREEMENT DATE December 1". 2010 For 9-1-1 Emergency Communications This agreement is made between the Public Safety Answering Point,hereafter referred to a PSAP, and the Yorkville Police Department for the purpose of effective handling and routing of 9-1-1 emergency calls for wireline and wireless calls.. Kendall County PSAP Center receiving a call for emergency services in your jurisdiction shall dispatch the call in the following manner. Primary: Direct Dispatch Secondary: Telephone This agreement shall provide that,once an emergency twit is dispatched in response to a request through the system,such unit shall render its service to the requesting party without regard to whether the unit is operating outside its normal jurisdictional boundaries. The legislative intent is that 9-1-1 be used for emergency calls only.Therefore, all calls of an administrative or non-emergency nature shall be referred to your agencies published telephone number. The PSAP Center agrees to keep all records, times,and places of all calls.All records will be available to all participants of the 9-1-1 system. o , It shall be the responsibility of your agency to maintain the report of call,and the disposition of each call received. All agreements, management, records and service will be the responsibility of the advisory and policy board. Any agreements or changes in agreements and operating policies must be approved by the advisory board. Kencom Public Safety Dispatch Yorkville Pol� e Department By: By: Title: Director Title: CN.g'F '6F t?b LSxf `� I3 fry Reviewed By: J� 0 Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ II#7 EST. -� _ 1838 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development ❑ PS 2012-10 A ��' Police LE Public Works Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Weather warning siren update Meeting and Date: Committee of the Whole—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: An update on the installation of the City's three new weather warning sirens. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/A Council Action Requested: Informational item Submitted by: Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council ES T �� 1836 From: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works CC: Date: June 7, 2012 � < ao �yo�0 Subject: Weather Warning Sirens LE The weather warning sires are nearing completion. I spoke with a Corn Ed representative this morning to let them know that everything is ready for them to energize the sirens. The representative is going to make a site visit on Friday June 8th to make sure that everything is completed and all of the sirens are ready to be energized. She will then put in the order to the field crews to set the meter and energize the sirens. This last process usually takes between 10- 14 days according to the rep. If this schedule is accurate, the weather warning sirens should all be operational by June 22"d. I will keep everyone updated if the schedule changes. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0 Legal ❑ II#8 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ PW 2012-37 Police ALE ��' Public Works Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Annual MFT Expenditure Statement for general maintenance Meeting and Date: COW June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Annual expenditure statement to IDOT for general maintenance appropriations. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: None Council Action Requested: None—informational Submitted by: Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Agenda Item Notes: United City of Yorkville Public Works Department EW. 1836 800 Game Farm Rd. ti Yorkville, IL 60560 ' s 9 C Phone — 630-553-4370 Fax — 630-553-4377 IDOT District 3 May 31 , 2012 Attn: Mr. Eric Therkildsen Acting Deputy Director of Highways Region II Engineer 700 E. Norris Drive Ottawa, IL 61350-0697 Mr. Therkildsen, I am respectfully submitting the 11 -00000-00-GM Municipal Maintenance Expenditure Statement for the United City of Yorkville. If you have any questions or need further information, please let me know. Sincerely, i Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Rd. Yorkville, IL 60560 630-553-4370 — office 630-878-7102 — cell edhusena.vorkville.il.us q�l Illinois Department Municipal Maintenance Transportation Expenditure Statement Section Number: 11 - 00000 - 00 - GM Municipality: United City of Yorkville I hereby certify that the maintenance operations shown below were completed in accordance with the items of work listed on the Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs, Form BLR 14231 approved on 03/22/2011 , and revised or supplemental Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs, Form BLR 14231 , approved on 06/16/2011 , and that the expenditure of motor fuel tax funds, for that work, during the period from May 2011 thru April 2012 is as shown and that receipted bills are on file and available for audit. Maintenance Operation Costs Maintenance Operation Completed Group For III or III For details see approved BLR 14231 1, 11, Ill, Iv Labor Materials I Equipment Totals Bituminous Patching IIA Bituminous Cold Patch 5,854.76 $5,854. 76 Surface Hot Mix 11 ,283.95 $11 ,283. 95 Signs, Posts and Hardware IIA 5,972.04 $5,972.04 Bulk Rock Salt IIA 129,390.65 $129,390.65 Misc. Bituminous Patching IV 47;092.90 $47,092. 90 Total Maintenance Cost: $ 199,594.30 Less Other Contributions and/or Refunds: Net Cost of Maintenance: $199,594.30 Net Cost of Engineering: Maintenance Engineering 1 . Total Motor Fuel Tax Funds authorized 289,400. 00 2. Net cost to date 199, 594. 30 3. Unexpended balance $895805.70 4. Outstanding bills 5. Credit to unobli ated balance line 3 or line 3 minus line 4 $89, 805. 70 Remarks: Submitted: J — Approved: By Date �i Date Z.. l/ Municipal Official Title Regional Engineer Submit Four (4) Copies to Regional Engineer Page 1 of 1 BLR 14310 (Rev. 12/05) Printed on 5/31/2012 9:10:04 AM Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0 Legal ❑ II#9 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ❑ -- City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ PW 2012-38 Police ALE ��' Public Works Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Annual Traffic Signal Refund Meeting and Date: COW June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Per our agreement with IDOT this is the amount the State owes us for maintaining the traffic signals within the city limits. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: None Council Action Requested: None—informational Submitted by: Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Agenda Item Notes: ,r c� United City of Yorkville Public Works Department MT 1836 800 Game Farm Rd. Yorkville, IL 60560 �9 O Phone — 630-553-4370 Fax — 630-553-4377 <CE Warren Norris May 31 , 2012 IDOT District 3 700 E. Norris Drive Ottawa, IL 61350 Warren, I am respectfully submitting the United City of Yorkville' s request for traffic signal reimbursement in the amount of $20,018.89 for fiscal year 2011 -2012 per our agreement. If you have any questions or need further documentation, please let me know. Sincerely, L� Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Rd. Yorkville, IL 60560 630-553-4370 630-878-7102 edhuse @yorkville.il.us Traffic Signal Reim_ bursement Submission - ainta - - _ i Untied City of Yorkville M _ _ � - Energy Maintenance & US 47 & Van Emmon St. _ -- $851 38 State Share State Total ComEd Bill State Share State Total Energy Total 9 50% 1 $143.64 _ $1 ,380._33_ 50% $690.17 : $833.80 US 34 & US -E _ Y _ $493.36 _ 50% $425.69 _ _ 50% $0.001 $425.69 Traffic Si nal Location Date Work was Performed Invoiced Amount US 34 & Center Parkway _ _ -- - $287 27 - 100% $49.3.36 _ 100% $0.00 _ $493.36 US 47 & US 71 $547.14 100% - _ 100% $1 ,521 .25 _--t2,068.39 _ US 47 & US 126 _ - - _ _ -- - $384.58 _ _ 100% _ _ 100% $1 ,017.34 __ $1 ,401 .92 US 47 & Fox St _ - $684.38 50% $384.58 $1 017 34 - - 50% $0.00 $342. 19 US 47 & Somonauk_- _ _. . _ -_ _-. $342.19 _ - - - . $547.14 1 521 .25 Y Y I 50% $1 ,493.80 _ $823.24 ! 50% $411 .62 $11905.42 50% $623.09 50% _ $0.00 - $623.09 $1$387 34 -- - - - -- - US 34 & Cannonball Ttr. _. _ $2,967 60 ' 50% $775.66 _ 50% $0.00 $775.66 US 47 & Count side Parkwa $1 ,246 18 US 47 & Cannonball Tr. ! - - 50% $193.67 _ $2 823 74 _ Y Y ° T - 50% $1 411 .87 $ $250.54 - Ir Kennedy - - - -- - - -- $319.87 _ $$86.83 670/c $62.37 $250.85 US 47 & Market Rd. - - $1 ,466.01 670 $143.64 $1 ,323.19� I - 67% $58.18 _ $1 040.41 US 47 & Landmark Ave -� - - _ - $287.27 _ 50 /° _- _ - - 6767 /x.24 _ $524.11 - - _ - 50% $661 .60 $805.23 US 34 & Count side Parkwa _ $281 .32 67 /o $188.48 93 US 34 & Marketplace Dr. - �- - $477.42 6700 -- - US 47 & Greenbrier St. Unknown Build Date. _ $2$0.00 50 � _-_$1$O.a $181 .9 $90.99 $234.62- - 50% 50.00 $o.00 US 34 & Game Farm Rd. _ _ - $471 .34 67% $315.80 _ $892.79 67% I $598.17 _ $913.97_ - . - __ $693.23 _ 67% $464.46 _ _ _ $51 .80_ 67% _ $34.71 - - - - $499.17 US 47 & Wheaton Ave. - US 34 & Bristol Ridge Rd. -- _ - $583.31 . � 67°k $390.82 - _ $165.76 67°k $117.06 $501 .88 US 47 & Saravanos D_c_ - _ _ - $281 .32 _0% $0.00 $164.54 0% $0.00 _ _ $0.00 US 34 & S camore St. _ _ $1 ,697.59 I 0% , _ $0.00 - -- $0.00 _ _ _ $0.00 US 34 & Beecher Rd. __ _ $841 .78 50% I $420.89 $127.82 0% 30.00 _ $0.00 US 47 & Aldi Entrance Part of Rt 47 Widening Project $0 00 _ _ $0 00 - _ - $371 .74 _ 50% � $1 $0.87 _ _ _ $6$0.76 US 47 & Rosenwinkle St. _ - $1 ,319.94 67% 1. $884.36 $238.94 - 67% $160.09 _ $1 ,044.45 US 34 & Isabel St. $281 .32 0% .. $0.00 . $649.03 0% $0.00 $0.00 - $2 - _ _ . US 126 & US 71 $2,316.31 100% . $2,316.31 79.72 100% $_ 279.72 1 $2,5$0.03 US 47 & Fonview Dr. - - $0.00 _ Ow $0.00 - _ _ Oq0 $0.00 ___ $0.0.0 _ untai US 34 & Autumn Creek Blvd. -t281 .32 67% $188.48 -- - $504.29 67% $337.87 $526.36 US 47 & Baseline Rd. IPOT Dist 1 Will Keep Maint. I I _ $0.00 Totals: $20,987.30 $12181 .791 ', $13,002.251 $7837.10 - $20,078.89 (Grand Total { 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� $ 06 Legal El #10 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ■ -_� City Administrator E] Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El� wn sw _© Community Development ❑ PW 2012-39 � Police F-1 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: NPDES Permit Report Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Informational Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: None Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator EST _ lass From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works o p Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation <LE Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: June 5, 2012 Subject: NPDES MS4 Stormwater Permit The City adopted its Stormwater Management Plan in March 2010 which was required by the IEPA in order for the City to be compliance with the NPDES MS4 Permit. One of the requirements of the permit is to submit an annual report each June to the IEPA. The report is to detail the City's progress towards its goals that it outlined in its plan. The report is provided for informational purposes and will be submitted to the IEPA by June 15 '. If you have any questions or require additional information,please let us know. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Bureau of Water • 1021 N. Grand Avenue E. • P.O. Box 19276 • Springfield • Illinois • 62794-9276 Division of Water Pollution Control ANNUAL FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT for NPDES Permit for Storm Water Discharges from Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) This fillable form may be completed online,a copy saved locally,printed and signed before it is submitted to the Compliance Assurance Section at the above address. Complete each section of this report. Report Period: From March, 2011 To March,2012 Permit No. ILR40 0554 MS4 OPERATOR INFORMATION: (As it appears on the current permit) - Name: United City of Yorkville Mailing Address 1: 800 Game Farm Road Mailing Address 2: — County: Kendall City: Yorkville State: IL Zip:60560 Telephone: (630) 553-4350 Contact Person: Bart Olson, City Administrator Email Address: bolson @yorkville.il.us (Person responsible for Annual Report) Name(s) of governmental entity(ies) in which MS4 is located: (As it appears on the current permit) United City of Yorkville THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE ADDRESSED. A. Changes to best management practices (check appropriate BMP change(s) and attach information regarding change(s)to BMP and measurable goals.) 1. Public Education and Outreach ✓❑ 4. Construction Site Runoff Control ❑ 2. Public Participation/Involvement ❑✓ 5. Post-Construction Runoff Control ❑✓ 3. Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination ❑✓ 6. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping ❑ B. Attach the status of compliance with permit conditions, an assessment of the appropriateness of your identified best management practices and progress towards achieving the statutory goal of reducing the discharge of pollutants to the MEP, and your identified measurable goals for each of the minimum control measures. C. Attach results of information collected and analyzed, including monitoring data, if any during the reporting period. D. Attach a summary of the storm water activities you plan to undertake during the next reporting cycle (including an implementation schedule.) E. Attach notice that you are relying on another government entity to satisfy some of your permit obligations (if applicable). F. Attach a list of construction projects that your entity has paid for during the reporting period. Any person who knowingly makes a false,fictitious, or fraudulent material statement,orally or in writing, to the Illinois EPA commits a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent offense after conviction is a Class 3 felony. (415 ILCS 5144(h)) Owner Signature: Date. Bart Olson City Administrator Printed Name: Title. EMAIL COMPLETED FORM TO: epa ms4annualinsp(a illinois.gov or Mail to: ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WATER POLLUTION CONTROL COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE SECTION#19 1021 NORTH GRAND AVENUE EAST POST OFFICE BOX 19276 SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62794-9276 This Agency is authorized to require this information under Section 4 and Title X of the Environmental Protection Act(415 ILCS 514,5/39),Failure to disclose this information may result in: a civil penalty of not to exceed$50,000 for the violation and an additional civil penalty of not to exceed$10,000 for each day during IL 532 2585 which the violation continues(415 ILCS 5/42)and may also prevent this form from being processed and could result in your application being denied.This form WPC 691 Rev 6/10 has been approved by the Forms Management Center. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ANNUAL FACILITY INSPECTION REPORT NPDES PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS (MS4) UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, IL: MARCH 2011 TO MARCH 2012 THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE ADDRESSED. A. CHANGES TO BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES(BMP CHANGES). The City is proposing the following changes to the Best Management Practices for the six minimum control measures as submitted in the 2008 NOI for the City and the City's Stormwater Management Plan adopted in March of 2010. Public Education and Outreach The City no longer publishes a City newsletter, due to budget constraints, and therefore is removing the BMP of including stormwater or recycling items in their newsletter from their Stormwater Management Plan requirements. Public Participation and Involvement The City's Green Committee merged with the Chamber of Commerce Green Committee and therefore the City is no longer maintaining minutes for Green Committee Meetings and is removing that requirement from their Stormwater Management Plan. City staff will handle Stormwater Management Plan responsibilities previously delegated to the Green Committee. Construction Site Runoff Control There are no proposed changes to the BMPs in this area. Post Construction Site Runoff Control Due to staff and budget constraints the City is unable to maintain their planned schedules for stormwater basin inspections and Homeowner Association (HOA) contacts and education. Therefore, the City proposes to modify the BMPs in these areas to state that the City will provide assistance for citizens and HOAs regarding post construction runoff control on an as requested basis. The City will document the request and follow up action taken. The City will investigate a return to a more active program in the future if budget and staff considerations allow it. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Due to staff and budget constraints the City was unable to perform inspections on all their stormwater outfalls. Therefore, the City proposes to modify this BMP to state that the City will take action to correct problems with stormwater outfalls as they are reported to the City and will document the incidents and corrective actions taken to address the problem. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping There are no proposed changes to the BMPs in this area. IEPA MS4 2011-2012 Annual Report United City of Yorkville Page 2 of 5 B. STATUS OF COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS AND ASSESMENT OF THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE IDENTIFIED BEST MANEGEMENT PRACTICES TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE STATUTORY GOAL OF REDUCING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO THE MEP, AND THE IDENTIFIED MEASURABLE GOALS FOR EACH OF THE MINIMUM CONTROL MEASURES. The City has endeavored to meet the requirements of the permit conditions as outlined in the Stormwater Management Plan and in consideration of current staffing and budget constraints. The status of the permit activities for the reporting period is as follows. Public Education and Outreach The City maintains an information center at City Hall that includes informational items regarding stormwater related issues. The City did not publish a newsletter, due to budget constraints, during the reporting period and so was unable to meet the measurable goal of including a stormwater/recycling item in the newsletter. Despite not meeting all the measureable goals in the Stormwater Management Plan, the City is still in compliance with minimum control measures by providing public education and outreach materials at the City Hall and on its website. Public Participation and Involvement The City maintained documentation on the number and type of calls received from the public regarding potential illicit discharges. The City received four calls in this reporting period. The City also sponsors an Environmental Fair. While the City did not have an Environmental Fair during the reporting period planning activities for their most recent Environmental Fair on 4/22/12 were conducting during the reporting period. The Environmental Fair on 4/22/12 was attended by 150 residents. The Green Committee merged with the Chamber of Commerce's Green Committee and the City is no longer responsible for maintaining meeting minutes. City staff handled Stormwater Management Plan responsibilities previously delegated to the Green Committee. The above activities demonstrate the City's compliance with minimum control measures for Public Participation and Involvement. Construction Site Runoff Control The City tracked the number of site development permits issued. There were 2 site development permits issued during the reporting period. The City documents any citizen complaints regarding construction site runoff and implements and documents a follow up procedure. There were no citizen construction runoff complaints during the reporting period. The City inspects construction sites for erosion and sediment control as required by the NPDES Pen-nit and the City's Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. The above activities demonstrate the City's compliance with minimum control measures for Construction Site Runoff Control. Post Construction Site Runoff Control The City proposed a BMP to annually inspect 20% of all stormwater basins and document the inspections on the forms developed in the Stormwater Management Plan. The City developed a database of basins but due to staff and budget constraints the City was not able to perform inspection this reporting period. However, no post construction runoff basin related complaints from citizens were received. The City maintains a database of Home Owners Associations(HOA) and encourages HOAs to inspect and maintain their stormwater management basins. The City proposed a BMP to make contact with 20% of HOAs IEPA NIS4 2011-2012 Annual Report United City of Yorkville Page 3 of 5 annually regarding stormwater related issues. Due to staff and budget constraints the City has not formally contacted and provided information to HOAs since their HOA Forum in September of 2010. However,the City makes information available and provides assistance on an as needed basis when requested by HOAs. The City requires new developments to enter into maintenance agreements for stormwater facilities. There have been no new developments requiring maintenance agreement in the reporting period. Despite not meeting all the measurable goals in the Stormwater Management Plan, the City is in compliance with minimum control measures for Post Construction Runoff Control because their ordinances address post construction requirements and City staff respond to citizen complaints and HOA requests for information and assistance. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination The City maintains and updates as necessary their stormwater Outfall Inventory. In addition, the City tracks the number and types of Illicit Discharges and the steps taken to eliminate the discharge as potential discharges are brought to their attention. There was one potential illicit discharges reported during the reporting period. The City proposed a BMP to inspect all stormwater outfalls on an annual basis and record the inspections on inspection and summary forms. However, due to staffing and budget constraints the City has been unable to inspect the outfalls during the reporting period. However,city staff will take action if problems with the outfalls are reported to the City. Despite not meeting all the measurable goals in the Stormwater Management Plan, the City is in compliance with the minimum control measures for Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination because they have ordinances and procedures in place to address and correct illicit discharge when they are discovered. The City takes action as necessary in accordance with these ordinances when illicit discharges or problems with stormwater outfalls are reported. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping The City provided services and maintained records for the following good housekeeping activities: number of curb miles swept, amount of leaves collected, amount of road salt used, number of catch basins cleaned, and the amount of herbicides and pesticides used, and training provided for employees. Due to budget constraints no formal NPDES training was provided to employees; however, employees are kept informed on best management practices through implementation of the Stormwater Management Plan. These activities place the City in compliance with the minimum control measures for Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping. C. RESULTS OF INFORMATION AND DATA COLLECTED AND ANALYZED. The following data was collected or information analyzed for the above permit cycle and is attached to this report. Public Education and Outreach No data was collected or information analyzed in this area during the reporting period, Public Participation and Involvement Documentation regarding citizen illicit discharge complaints is attached. Documentation regarding the Environmental Fair is attached. Construction Site Runoff Control IEPA MS4 2011-2012 Annual Report United City of Yorkville Page 4 of 5 There was no data collected or information analyzed in this area during the reporting period. Post Construction Site Runoff Control No data was collected or information analyzed in this area during the reporting period. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Documentation regarding Illicit Discharge Investigations is attached Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping The City swept 640 curb miles in the reporting period. The City collected 1050 cubic yards of leaves during their fall collection. The City used 981 tons of road salt during the winter. The City cleaned 242 catch basins during the reporting period. The City applied 84 gallons of herbicides and pesticides during the reporting period. D. SUMMARY OF STORM WATER ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR THE NEXT REPORTING CYCLE. The City is proposing to follow the plan of activities as described in their approved Stormwater Management Plan for the upcoming year. These activities would include the following Public Education and Outreach The City will continue to maintain an information center at City Hall that contains stormwater and recycling related information for City residents. Public Participation and Involvement The City will continue to maintain documentation regarding the number and type of calls received from the public regarding illicit discharges. The City will also work on planning for their next Environmental Fair. Construction Site Runoff Control The City will continue to track the number of site development permits issued. The City will continue to document and follow up on citizen complaints regarding construction site runoff. The City will continue to inspect active construction sites in accordance with NPDES Permit and Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance requirements. Post Construction Site Runoff Control The City will maintain their databases of HOAs and Stormwater Basins. The City will provide information and assistance to citizens and HOAs on an as requested basis. The City will continue to require new developments to enter into maintenance agreements for their stormwater basins. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination The City will continue to track the number and type of potential illicit discharges and problems with stormwater outfalls that are reported. The City will document the incidents and the corrective actions on their summary forms and in accordance with their ordinances and procedures. IEPA MS4 2011-2012 Annual Report United City of Yorkville Page 5 of 5 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping The City will continue to provide services and maintain records for the following good housekeeping activities: number of curb miles swept, amount of leaves collected, amount of road salt used, number of catch basins cleaned, and the amount of herbicides and pesticides used, and training provided for employees. E. NOTICE OF PERMIT OBLIGATIONS SATISFIED BY OTHER GOVERNMENT ENTITIY. The City is not depending on other units of government to meet any of its' permit obligations. F. LIST OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS PAID FOR BY THE CITY OF YORKVILLE FOR THE 2011-2012 REPORTING PERIOD. The City has paid for the following construction projects in the 2011-2012 reporting period. 2011 MFT Maintenance Program—Pavement Patching Game Farm Road Kendall Marketplace Improvements—Misc.curb repair,pavement patching and grading/seeding. �E0 C/ph. Complaint Date 6/14/2011 Reported By Complaint ID 2011-06-041 Resident EST. 9836 Name of Complainant •?r" Address of Complainant Phone Number Location of Complaint: 1824 Columbine Dr Location Description Location-Lot M 82 1 Location-Subdivision: Sunflower Estates PIN: 05-05-442-002 Property Owner: Joseph Skora,1824 Columbine Dr.,Yorkville,IL 60560 Description of Complaint: Water draining in neighbors yard and damaging the wooden fence Complaint Assigned To: PZ ActionTaken: Violation: Comment: Notification: Page 1 `gip ��Ty Complaint Date 11/28/2011 O� Reported By Complaint ID 2011-11-006 Elected EST" ► 7836 Name of Complainant Aid Gilson p ir: Address of Complainant EL v� Phone Number Location of Complaint: 1824 Columbine Dr Location Description Location-Lot#: 82 1 Location-Subdivision: Sunflower PIN: 05-05-442-002 Property Owner: Owner Verified Joseph Skora,1824 Sunflower Dr.,Yorkvillem,IL 60560 Description of Complaint: Water draining into neighbors yard,damaging fence. Complaint Assigned To: Mark Hardin ActionTaken: MH inspected 11-28-11 discussed problem with Eric Dhuse and the propertyowner who has agreed to correct the situation.MH to continue to monitor the situation. Violation: 4-1-5 Nuisances and offensive conditions,generaly:3. Discharging of offensive matter. Comment: Notification: Page 1 Complaint Date 12/12/2011 BV Complaint ID 2011-12-003 Reported Resident EST. �1 18 Name of Complainant pO Address of Complainant Phone Number Location of Complaint: 312 Olson St Location Description Water draining on street causing icing Location-Lot#: 2 1 Location-Subdivision: Edgewood PIN: 05-39-353-006 Property Owner: Sucich,312 Olson St.,Yorkville,IL 60560 Description of Complaint: Water draining Complaint Assigned To: Public Works ActionTaken: Violation: Comment: Notification: Page 1 D {� Complaint Date 3/19/2012 Reported BY Complaint/D 2012-03-015 Resident EST �"� 1036 Name of Complainant Anon (�� I �:�•- a Address of Complainant 'F' 2 Phone Number Location of Complaint: 2008 Old Glory Ct Location Description Location-Lot#: 232 4 Location-Subdivision: Grande Reserve PIN: 02-14-353-005 Property Owner: Abayomi Nichols,2008 Old Glory Ct.,Yorkville, IL 60560 Description of Complaint: Draining fuel tank and flowing across neighbors curbs and into sewer.Also has 55 gal steel drum of fuel Complaint Assigned To: PeteRatos ActionTaken: Forwarder copy to Eric Dhuse. Violation: Comment: Notification: Page 1 ORKVILLE AREA Cl IAMBER OF COMMCRCL EEN COMMITTEE 4"' Annual Environmental "Go Green" Fair Beecher Center 908 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, IL Saturday, April 21, 2012 11 am - 4pm The City of Yorkville and the Green Committee of the Yorkville �' � 1• d Chamber of Commerce are hosting the 4+h annual Environmental , "Go Green" Fair at the Beecher Center. This is a FREE one-day + informational fair offering 40 exhibits on a variety of environmentally friendly topics for individuals, students and families. f AA Schedule: 11am—4pm: Exhibits in main hall 12pm—3pm: Presentations in separate room `"- 11 am—3pm: Student Art Fair& Family Activities in Library Hourly: Raffles JOIN US! Eco-friendly Activities Are you a business offering organic or environmentally safe Electric products, service or environmentally-based education? Interested in participating? Environmental Deadline is March 31, 2012, and Vendor Application can be F obtained at: www.YorkvilleChamber.org. Electronic Recycling Questions? Please contact: Family Activities Cheryl A.Lee/President CL Design-Build,Inc. Bee Keeper Custom Homes for Your Life,Your Earth! P.O.Box 336,Yorkville,IL 60560 p:630.882.8822 f:630.445.4022 _ Story of email:CLDesignBuild @aol.com L. web:www.CLL7esienl3uild.com Green • Products Raffles. Environmental Presentations • Door Prizes ?A 0 Cl United City of Yorkville Public Works Department EST "' - 1836 800 Game Farm Rd. Yorkville,IL 60560 Phone—630-553-4370 �? Fax—630-553-4377 �L Notes from site visit to 920 N. Bridge St. to investigate a complaint that the business was illegally discharging into the municipal storm sewer. • Original call taken by PW at approximately 3:00 pm on 7/26/11 • Eric Dhuse and Dave Behrens investigated at 10:00 am on 7/27/11 with the following conclusions. • Pepe's restaurant located at 920 N. Bridge was discharging used grease and oil illegally into our storm sewer system and in to the nearby retention pond. (pictures attached) • Called Kendall County Health Department and IEPA to try to alert them to possible violations within their jurisdiction at approximately 10:30 • Met with Erich Hess from KCHD and went back to the site to talk to the person in charge. We asked an employee to phone the manager and we both explained the violations and the remedies that they would need to do to come into compliance. KCHD stated that until the grease trap was functional,they would have to temporarily close the business. It was explained to the manager that the underground grease trap needs to be repaired,the unapproved grease containers be removed, and that the business prove to the KCHD that they have a written contract with a licensed grease hauler that proves that they will have the grease trap pumped on a normal basis before the restaurant can re- open. • During this time I also placed a call to Mr. Antoine Williams of the IEPA. I am waiting for a return call or to meet with him before a mitigation plan will be developed. • I did issue a citation for illegal discharge into a municipal storm sewer. The adjudication date is 8/31/11 ILIFEN—CAP, inc. AWN Environmental Consultants • Nacive Landscape Specialists • Erosion and Sedinlew Control Professionals 1709 Afton Road Sycamore,IL 60178 Phone:(815)899-1621 Fax:(815)899-6821 www.encapino.net November 1, 2011 Ms. Laura Schraw ASLA, City Park Designer City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 RE: Pepe's Mexican Restaurant Dear Ms. Schraw, ENCAP, Inc. investigated shortly after the release of cooking oil into the storm sewer. It appeared any oil that made it into the grass area has not adversely affected down stream water resources. We visited the site periodically and it is evident that no damage has been done to the basin bottom or the side slope. We recommend that the storm sewer is cleaned and any residual oil be disposed of appropriately. If you should have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at (815) 899- 1621. Sincerely, /I Carl Peterson Vice President -n 0 > z 0 co 0 c Z CL 0) :r 0,no z $A zy CL. SD CD -0 U) CD zxm 6 5T R > .,—D ID CD m CL m CD CD 2 m z C, w =r cr 0 (n < w CA 0 iz� z w rm- �t -- co > -n ril (=D cr CD S<' < z —> 01 r-m m 0 CD C-N CD 0) U) 0 Q- 0 -n C: 0 0 (W — a) p - =T z,00,o a,0 CD SD m 7 Er CL T a) OM7 CD > CD ---ri, w m Cf) m o T 0 0 Z Fn cc', -n -4 U3 CD (D 0 P) 7— z) -n r m C- CD 3 t� CL C? rn cr r- 0 in ID m CL m z m .1 I I . t co . 11 @ C) Ch cr 0 z 0 CL w 2 P CL (D ,0 > z 1>0 — 0 M A w Z > m ;Q o > > 03 CL CD r- 2 z m 0 to p ro CD z =3 CL w 0 -n 0 N 1: m lI to 0 > > IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ) a municipal corporation. ) Petitioner, ) V. ) Citation Number: N 1033 Docket Number: 11-OV-00452 Pepe's Restaurant ) c/o Juan Hurtado ) 920 N. Bridge St. ) Yorkville, IL 60560 ) Respondent, ) FINDING,DECISION AND ORDER THIS MATTER coming to be heard before me as the Administrative Hearing Officer for the above- captioned municipality, notice having been given and the Administrative Hearing Officer having been advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: As to the violation(s) alleged in the pleadings,the Administrative Hearing Officer finds and rules as Iollows: Charge/Code Violation# Finding Decision Fines Costs Full Compliance By 8.17.5 $ $ October 17,2011 Nonstormwater Liable Discharges: Discharge Exemptions Not Liable JUDGMENT TOTAL: $ IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: �/ y ENTERED: September 7.2011 =? Administrative IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT UNITED CITY OF YORKVIL.LE, ) a municipal corporation. ) Petitioner, ) Citation Number: N 1033 Docket Numbet: 11-OV-00452 Pepe's Restaurant ) c/o Juan Hurtado ) 920 N. Bridge St. ) Yorkville, IL 60560 ) Respondent, ) FINDING,DECISION AND ORDER THIS MATTER coming to be heard before me as the Administrative Hearing Officer for the above- captioned municipality, notice having been given and the Administrative Hearing Officer having been advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: As to the violation(s) alleged in the pleadings,the Administrative Hearing Officer finds and rules as follows: Charge/Code Violation# Finding Decision Fines Costs Full Compliance By 8-17-5 $ 5r $ �' January 17, 2012 Nonstormwater ® Liable Discharges: Discharge Exemptions Not Liable JUDGMENT TOTAL: S S00 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: ENTERED: December 7. 2011 Administrative Hearing Officer Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0 Legal ❑ II#11 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ■ -- City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number m Human Resources F-1 C�"Sad `=Q Community Development ❑❑ PW 2012-40 Police ALE ��' Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Safe Routes to School (SRTS)Update Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Informational Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: None Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST lass From: Brad Sanderson, EEI 41 fv Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: June 5, 2012 �MMAC.- 'q Subject: Safe Routes to School LE Summary The purpose of this memo is to provide an update as to the status of the Safe Routes to School project. Background This item was last discussed at a May City Council meeting. At that meeting, the City Council reviewed the current sidewalk exhibits and expressed some interest in changing the locations of the sidewalks. Update After the City Council discussion, further discussions with IDOT regarding proposed project limits, and cost estimate updates the proposed project scope is as shown in the attached exhibit. The major change from the project scope is the deletion of the sidewalk from Heustis. The reason for the deletion is that the vast majority of the existing sidewalk is outside of public right- of-way and at this point the schedule and the budget for the grant do not allow us to obtain the easements utilizing proper federal land acquisition procedures. We do recommend that the City consider pursuing the easements along Heustis separately from this project and include the sidewalk replacement as part of its capital improvement plan. We are targeting a fall bid letting for the project and a spring/summer 2013 construction. We also anticipate hosting a public meeting on the project later this summer. If the City Council would like to hold a public information meeting prior to the bid letting, that meeting should be scheduled immediately to meet our grant timelines. We have $280,000 in grant funds, and we have a conservative estimate of $305,000 in sidewalk sections selected for construction. This estimate includes the cost of engineering. We anticipate going out to bid for all $305,000 in sidewalks, and receiving a lower price. Tree-sidewalk conflicts At this point, we think that the only tree-sidewalk conflict will be on Orange Street (drawing attached). We have been talking with the property owner about his options, and will continue to do so. $ 17 , 000 Fox $ 87200 $45 ,000 -- I — -- - $ 16 ,300 I�I/ashin � $ 5 ,500 9'ton $ 16 ,000 $2, 1 )000 too htoo 9 as $ ,625 $ 1 5 ,800 $ 145700 $ 25', 700 a� - ----------- Z $ 16 ,000 I $ 1 .550 $ 16 ,'700 - - - Orange Dolp/i Do/ph $ 38 ,650 $ 1 6,750 $ 9 , 700 O/Sen $ 17 ,600- $ 13 ,600 Beecher Blaine Walter 0 100 200 Feet soh oo, $ 7 ,750 ho Legend 0 Existing Sidewalks Proposed Sidewalks Section Removed From Project DATE: 9 9 P y OCTOBER 2011 SAFE ROUTES APPROVED LOCATION MAP Engineering Enterprises, Inc. United City of Yorkville PROJECT NO.: CONSULTING ENGINEERS 800 Game Farm Road TO SCHOOL 52 Wheeler Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Y01114 PATH: Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 (630) 553-4350 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (630) 466-6700/ www.eeiweb.con http://www.yorkville.il.us FILE: H:/GIS/PUBLICYORKVILLE/2011Y01114 KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS NORTH NO. DATE REVISIONS Y01114 REMOVED.MXD F.A.U. SECTION COUNTY TOTAL SHEET RTE. SHEETS NO. N/A 10-00040-00-SW KENDALL 12 11 CONTRACT NO. XXXXX I 3 I I 0 4"0 0 - - - - - - - - - - �- - - - - - - -- 3 NI � O w w w w w w w w w w w w w w m W w ~ °0 0 20' 40' 70-0 71+00 O RANGE STREET 72+00 73 M - - - —I - - - —I - - - ti SCALE FEET Z Q co ORANGE STREET I Q I CONSTRUCTION BEGINS ��/ co STA 70+00 I O LL 0 e Z LU — — — — — — 5' (TYP.) ° ° 36"0 Q 0 0 e 24„� 28"0 24"0 6„0 24°0 0„0 RELOCATE SIGN PANEL ASSEMBLY (BY OTHERS) DETECTABLE WARNING, 10 0 8 SQ. FT. ° o I e NI PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK, STA 70+00 TO STA 76+57 6 INCH, 105 SQ. FT. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK, EARTH EXCAVATION, 5.8 CU. YD. 5 INCH, 2,551 SQ. FT. AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, TYPE B, RESTORATION, 793 SQ. YD. 4.7 TON I a EARTH EXCAVATION, 87 CU. YD. AGGREGATE BASE COURSE, TYPE B, 77 TON I I , 0 + M e a I � e LU ° I- o W m WI 0 LU LU W 28"0 Y� LU CO OC , ORANGE STREET ORANGE STREET + 00 r/ 74+00 75+00 76+00 76+57 CONSTRUCTION ENDS STA 76+57 ~ W a LU Z DETECTABLE WARNING, a: e 12 SQ. FT. °. VV 5' (TYP.) 6„� 8„0 2`. 10 24 6„� 0 6"0 22".� z e 8 24"0 — — — - - — 67 — — — — — — — — — I F EXIST. TREES TO 34"0 BE REMOVED ° o (BY OTHERS) (TYP.) HMA DRIVEWAY PA�EMENT, z o ° I 3 INCH, 6.0 SQ. YE). REMOVAL I J Q I z z I DRIVEWAY PAVEMEI T REMOVAL, & REPLACEMENT, J21.0 SQ. YD. 104 SQ. FT. o EXIST. TREE TO 00 I BE REMOVED o (BY OTHERS) o M I o COPYRIGHT © 2012 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. j N Engineering Enterprises, Inc. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL ORANGE STREET DATE: JUNE 2012 CONSULTING ENGINEERS PROJECT N0: Y01114 N 52 Wheeler Road 800 GAME FARM ROAD UNITED CITY OF YORK VI LLE STA 70+00 TO STA 76+57 FILE: Y01114-PLAN Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS 0 630.466.6700 / www.eeiweb.com YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SHEET 11 OF 12 0 N0. DATE REVISIONS 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� 6 Legal ❑ II#12 EST. 1&36 ■ Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator ■ r� _© Consultant E] ADM 2012-39 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Budget Report for May 2012 Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: May budget report and income statement. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Discussion Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION L May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget GENERAL FUND REVENUES 01-000-40-00-4000 PROPERTY TAXES-CORPORATE LEVY 325,574 325,574 2,288,133 14.23% 01-000-40-00-4010 PROPERTY TAXES-POLICE PENSION 62,734 62,734 413,354 15.18% 01-000-40-00-4012 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX INDUSTRIAL - - 20,000 0.00% 01-000-40-00-4030 MUNICIPAL SALES TAX 177,588 177,588 2,325,000 7.64% 01-000-40-00-4035 NON-HOME RULE SALES TAX 127,336 127,336 1,500,000 8.49% 01-000-40-00-4040 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX - - 603,432 0.00% 01-000-40-00-4041 NATURAL GAS UTILITY TAX - - 296,514 0.00% 01-000-40-00-4043 TELECOMMUNICATIONS TAX 39,153 39,153 490,000 7.99% 01-000-40-00-4044 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 1,422 1,422 23,500 6.05% 01-000-40-00-4045 CABLE FRANCHISE FEES 51,537 51,537 230,000 22.41% 01-000-40-00-4050 HOTEL TAX 3,893 3,893 50,000 7.79% 01-000-40-00-4060 AMUSEMENT TAX 2,097 2,097 134,000 1.56% 01-000-40-00-4065 ADMISSIONS TAX - - 104,500 0.00% 01-000-40-00-4070 BUSINESS DISTRICT TAX 20,290 20,290 300,000 6.76% 01-000-40-00-4075 AUTO RENTAL TAX 838 838 10,000 8.38% 01-000-41-00-4100 STATE INCOME TAX 263,968 263,968 1,320,000 20.00% 01-000-41-00-4105 LOCAL USE TAX 17,811 17,811 242,400 7.35% 01-000-41-00-4110 ROAD&BRIDGE TAX 26,133 26,133 170,000 15.37% 01-000-41-00-4120 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX 2,230 2,230 16,000 13.94% 01-000-41-00-4160 FEDERAL GRANTS 1,107 1,107 9,200 12.03% 01-000-41-00-4170 STATE GRANTS - - - 0.00% 01-000-41-00-4182 MISC INTERGOVERNMENTAL - - 2,000 0.00% 01-000-42-00-4200 LIQUOR LICENSE 1,773 1,773 40,000 4.43% 01-000-42-00-4205 OTHER LICENSES&PERMITS 60 60 2,700 2.22% 01-000-42-00-4210 BUILDING PERMITS 21,493 21,493 126,600 16.98% 01-000-43-00-4310 TRAFFIC FINES 4,338 4,338 95,000 4.57% 01-000-43-00-4320 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION 1,580 1,580 26,000 6.08% 01-000-43-00-4325 POLICE TOWS 3,500 3,500 80,000 4.38% 01-000-43-00-4350 LATE PMT PENALTIES-GARBAGE 14 14 - 0.00% 01-000-44-00-4400 GARBAGE SURCHARGE 156 156 1,021,784 0.02% 01-000-44-00-4405 COLLECTION FEE-YBSD - - 151,500 0.00% 01-000-44-00-4474 POLICE SPECIAL DETAIL - - 5,000 0.00% 01-000-44-00-4475 OFFENDER REGISTRATION FEES 5 5 500 1.00% 01-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 584 584 3,100 18.84% 01-000-46-00-4601 REIMB-LEGAL EXPENSES 1,100 1,100 - 0.00% 01-000-46-00-4604 REIMB-ENGINEERING EXPENSES 41,145 41,145 - 0.00% 01-000-46-00-4650 REIMB-TRAFFIC SIGNAL - - 15,000 0.00% 01-000-46-00-4668 REIMB-COBRA CONTRIBUTIONS 817 817 12,500 6.54% 01-000-46-00-4669 REIMB-RETIREE CONTRIBUTIONS 3,968 3,968 60,398 6.57% 01-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMP INS CONTRIBUTIONS 5,193 5,193 61,295 8.47% 01-000-46-00-4671 REIMB-LIFE INSURANCE 181 181 1,699 10.65% 01-000-46-00-4680 REIMB-LIABILITY INSURANCE 6,608 6,608 5,000 132.16% 01-000-46-00-4681 REIMB-WORKERS COMP 25,557 25,557 - 0.00% 01-000-46-00-4685 REIMB-CABLE CONSORTIUM 18,128 18,128 40,000 45.32% 01-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 753 753 4,000 18.82% 01-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 875 875 8,000 10.94% 01-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME - - 3,000 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES:GENERAL FUND 1,261,538 1,261,538 12,311,109 10.25% ADMINISTRATION EXPENDITURES 01-110-50-00-5001 SALARIES-MAYOR 825 825 11,000 7.50% 01-110-50-00-5002 SALARIES-LIQUOR COMM 83 83 1,000 8.33% 01-110-50-00-5003 SALARIES-CITY CLERK 742 742 9,000 8.24% 01-110-50-00-5004 SALARIES-CITY TREASURER 500 500 6,500 7.69% 01-110-50-00-5005 SALARIES-ALDERMAN 4,000 4,000 50,320 7.95% 01-110-50-00-5010 SALARIES-ADMINISTRATION 18,304 18,304 255,000 7.18% 01-110-50-00-5020 JOVERTIME - - 575 0.00% 1 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget 01-110-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 2,222 2,222 28,383 7.83% 01-110-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 1,695 1,695 22,500 7.53% 01-110-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 4,580 4,580 72,456 6.32% 01-110-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 29 29 614 4.72% 01-110-52-00-5223 GROUP DENTAL INSURANCE 386 386 5,096 7.58% 01-110-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 44 44 586 7.58% 01-110-52-00-5235 ELECTED OFFICIAL-GROUP HEALTH INS 8,445 8,445 133,917 6.31% 01-110-52-00-5236 ELECTED OFFICIAL-GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 44 44 1,043 4.17% 01-110-52-00-5237 ELECTED OFFICIAL-DENTAL INSURANCE 758 758 10,008 7.58% 01-110-52-00-5238 ELECTED OFFICIAL-VISIONINSURANCE 86 86 1,129 7.58% 01-110-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - - 3,000 0.00% 01-110-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 6,000 0.00% 01-110-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING - 1,000 0.00% 01-110-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATION - 6,750 0.00% 01-110-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - 15,000 0.00% 01-110-54-00-5448 FILING FEES - 500 0.00% 01-110-54-00-5451 CODIFICATION - 8,000 0.00% 01-110-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING - - 14,000 0.00% 01-110-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 8,702 8,702 16,600 52.42% 01-110-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 541 541 20,000 170% 01-110-54-00-5473 KENDALL COUNTY PARATRANSIT - - 30,000 0.00% 01-110-54-00-5480 UTILITIES - - 23,100 0.00% 01-110-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 143 143 1,900 7.53% 01-110-54-00-5488 OFFICE CLEANING - - 14,400 0.00% 01-110-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,229 1,229 12,000 10.24% 01-110-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - 850 0.00% 01-110-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - - 100 0.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES:ADMINISTRATION 53,3570 53,357 1 782,327 1 6.82% FINANCE EXPENDITURES 01-120-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 12,991 12,991 185,000 7.02% 01-120-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 1,281 1,281 18,659 6.87% 01-120-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 985 985 13,005 7.58% 01-120-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 1,578 1,578 26,472 5.96% 01-120-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 22 22 461 4.72% 01-120-52-00-5223 DENTALINSURANCE 241 241 3,182 7.58% 01-120-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 27 27 356 7.58% 01-120-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 440 440 2,000 22.00% 01-120-54-00-5414 AUDITING SERVICES - - 36,000 0.00% 01-120-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - - 1,000 0.00% 01-120-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING - - 500 0.00% 01-120-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - - 600 0.00% 01-120-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING - - 500 0.00% 01-120-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 80 80 850 9.41% 01-120-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37 37 40,000 0.09% 01-120-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 143 143 4,900 2.92% 01-120-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANC - - 1,800 0.00% 01-120-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 273 273 2,500 10.92% 01-120-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 250 0.00% 01-120-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - 2,500 0.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES:FINANCE 18,099 18,099 340,535 5.31% POLICE EXPENDITURES 01-210-50-00-5010 SALARIES-POLICE OFFICERS 87,792 87,792 1,261,000 6.96% 01-210-50-00-5011 SALARIES-POLICE CHIEF&DEPUTIES 21,248 21,248 317,000 6.70% 01-210-50-00-5012 SALARIES-SERGEANTS 22,788 22,788 430,000 5.30% 01-210-50-00-5013 SALARIES-POLICE CLERKS 9,434 9,434 135,000 6.99% 01-210-50-00-5014 SALARIES-CROSSING GUARD 2,110 2,110 20,000 10.55% 01-210-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 2,017 2,017 52,500 3.84% 2 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget 01-210-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 5,429 5,429 90,000 6.03% 01-210-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 884 884 15,818 5.59% 01-210-52-00-5213 EMPLOYER CONTRI-POL PEN 62,734 62,734 413,354 15.18% 01-210-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 11,035 11,035 175,000 6.31% 01-210-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 26,554 26,554 517,950 5.13% 01-210-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 203 203 5,635 3.60% 01-210-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 2,474 2,474 37,428 6.61% 01-210-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 283 283 4,272 6.63% 01-210-54-00-5410 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT - - 2,800 0.00% 01-210-54-00-5411 POLICE COMMISSION 500 500 4,000 12.50% 01-210-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 2,250 2,250 15,000 15.00% 01-210-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 39 39 10,000 0.39% 01-210-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING - - 200 0.00% 01-210-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING - - 4,500 0.00% 01-210-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 44 44 36,500 0.12% 01-210-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING - - 3,000 0.00% 01-210-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS - - 1,350 0.00% 01-210-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 387 387 5,000 7.75% 01-210-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - - 20,000 0.00% 01-210-54-00-5467 ADMIN ADJ-HEARING OFFICER - - 20,000 0.00% 01-210-54-00-5469 NEW WORLD LIVE SCAN - - 15,000 0.00% 01-210-54-00-5472 KENDALL CO.JUVE PROBATION - - 4,000 0.00% 01-210-54-00-5484 MDT-ALERTS FEE - - 7,000 0.00% 01-210-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 277 277 4,500 6.16% 01-210-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 938 938 61,000 1.54% 01-210-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 67 67 16,000 0.42% 01-210-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES - - 4,000 0.00% 01-210-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - - 8,000 0.00% 01-210-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - 7,000 0.00% 01-210-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 16 16 12,250 0.13% 01-210-56-00-5650 COMMUNITY SERVICES - - 7,370 0.00% 01-210-56-00-5690 SUPPLIES-GRANT REIMBURSABLE - - 4,200 0.00% 01-210-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - - 90,950 0.00% 01-210-56-00-5696 1AMMUNITION - - 2,000 0.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES:POLICE 259,50 3,840,577 6.76% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES 01-220-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 14,236 14,236 195,000 7.30% 01-220-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES - - 53,000 0.00% 01-220-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 1,306 1,306 26,227 4.98% 01-220-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 1,050 1,050 19,000 5.53% 01-220-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 2,740 2,740 59,499 4.61% 01-220-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 15 15 461 3.15% 01-220-52-00-5223 DENTALINSURANCE 241 241 4,139 5.82% 01-220-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 27 27 471 5.73% 01-220-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - - 1,500 0.00% 01-220-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - - 1,000 0.00% 01-220-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING - - 500 0.00% 01-220-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING - - 4,250 0.00% 01-220-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - - 1,500 0.00% 01-220-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING - - 500 0.00% 01-220-54-00-5459 INSPECTIONS - - 25,000 0.00% 01-220-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 422 422 1,500 28.13% 01-220-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - 6,000 0.00% 01-220-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - - 2,000 0.00% 01-220-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 273 273 3,600 7.58% 01-220-54-00-5486 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - - 45,000 0.00% 01-220-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 34 34 500 6.88% 01-220-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - - 3,000 0.00% 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget 01-220-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - 125 0.00% 01-220-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 3,500 0.00% 01-220-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS - 500 0.00% 01-220-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - - 3,654 0.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES:COMMUNITY DEVELP 20,344 20,344 461,426 4.41% PUBLIC WORKS-STREET OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES 01-410-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 19,701 19,701 280,000 7.04% 01-410-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 224 224 15,000 1.49% 01-410-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 1,921 1,921 31,753 6.05% 01-410-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 1,470 1,470 23,500 6.25% 01-410-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 6,729 6,729 83,361 8.07% 01-410-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 36 36 1,317 2.75% 01-410-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 559 559 6,826 8.18% 01-410-52-00-5224 VISION INSURNCE 59 59 773 7.57% 01-410-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - - 2,000 0.00% 01-410-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - - 4,020 0.00% 01-410-54-00-5446 PROPERTY&BUILDING MAINT SERVICES 25 25 20,000 0.13% 01-410-54-00-5454 SIDEWALK PROGRAM - - 4,000 0.00% 01-410-54-00-5455 MOSQUITO CONTROL 6,730 6,730 7,000 96.14% 01-410-54-00-5458 TREE&STUMP REMOVAL - - 20,000 0.00% 01-410-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - 1,000 0.00% 01-410-54-00-5480 UTILITIES - - 90,000 0.00% 01-410-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 33 33 1,000 3.30% 01-410-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 126 126 35,000 0.36% 01-410-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 39 39 4,200 0.94% 01-410-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 106 106 9,500 1.12% 01-410-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 1,750 0.00% 01-410-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - - 36,500 0.00% 01-410-56-00-5656 PROPERTY&BUILDING MAINT SUPPLIES 173 173 20,000 0.86% 01-410-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - - 15,952 0.00% TOTAL EXP:PUBLIC WORKS-STREET OPS 37,931 37,931 714,452 5.31% PW-HEALTH&SANITATION EXPENDITURES 01-540-54-00-5441 GARBAGE SRVCS-SR SUBSIDY - - 153,216 0.00% 01-540-54-00-5442 GARBAGE SERVICES - 1,046,784 0.00% 01-540-54-00-5443 LEAF PICKUP - 6,000 0.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES:PW HEALTH&SAN - - 1,206,000 0.00% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES EXPENDITURES 01-640-50-00-5092 POLICE SPECIAL DETAIL WAGES - - 5,000 0.00% 01-640-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION-ERI - - 60,000 0.00% 01-640-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 20,610 20,610 - 0.00% 01-640-52-00-5225 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE - - 150 0.00% 01-640-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 11,387 11,387 47,143 24.15% 01-640-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE 58,047 58,047 332,256 17.47% 01-640-52-00-5240 RETIREES-GROUP HEALTH INS. 5,764 5,764 104,458 5.52% 01-640-52-00-5241 RETIREES-DENTAL INSURANCE 397 397 5,246 7.58% 01-640-52-00-5242 RETIREES-VISION INSURANCE 48 48 636 7.58% 01-640-52-00-5250 COBRA-GROUP HEALTH INS 408 408 11,375 3.59% 01-640-52-00-5251 COBRA-DENTAL INSURANCE - - 1,000 0.00% 01-640-52-00-5252 COBRA-VISION INSURANCE - - 125 0.00% 01-640-54-00-5450 INFORMATION TECH SRVCS 2,040 2,040 140,000 1.46% 01-640-54-00-5456 CORPORTATE COUNSEL - - 130,000 0.00% 01-640-54-00-5461 LITIGATION COUNSEL - - 60,000 0.00% 01-640-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 450 450 500 90.00% 01-640-54-00-5463 SPECIAL COUNSEL - - 25,000 0.00% 01-640-54-00-5465 JENGINEERING SERVICES - - 180,000 01-640-54-00-5475 1 CABLE CONSORTIUM FEE - - 85,000 4 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget 01-640-54-00-5481 HOTEL TAX REBATE - - 45,000 0.00% 01-640-54-00-5491 CITY PROPERTY TAX REBATE - - 1,500 0.00% 01-640-54-00-5492 SALES TAX REBATE - - 824,000 0.00% 01-640-54-00-5493 BUSINESS DISTRICT REBATE 20,290 20,290 300,000 6.76% 01-640-54-00-5494 ADMISSIONS TAX REBATE - - 104,500 0.00% 01-640-56-00-5625 REIMBURSEABLE REPAIRS - - 5,000 0.00% 01-640-70-00-7799 CONTINGENCIES - - 50,000 0.00% 01-640-99-00-9923 TRANSFER TO CITY WIDE CAPITAL 34,944 34,944 419,332 8.33% 01-640-99-00-9942 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE 8,289 8,289 99,465 8.33% 01-640-99-00-9979 TRANSFER TO PARK&RECREATION 79,657 79,657 955,886 8.33% 01-640-99-00-9982 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY OPS 9,733 9,733 41,978 23.19% TOTAL EXPENDITURES:ADMIN SERVICES 252,065 252,065 4,034,550 6.25% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 1,261,538 1,261,538 12,311,109 10.25% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 641,300 641,300 11,379,867 5.64% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) 620,238 620,238 931,242 FOX HILL SSA REVENUES 11-000-40-00-4011 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX HILL SSA 551 551 3.786 14.56% 11-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 0 0 - 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES:FOX HILL SSA 551 551 3,786 14.56% FOX HILL SSA EXPENDITURES 11-111-54-00-5495 1 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANC - 4.500 1 0.00% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 551 551 3,786 14.56% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES - - 4,500 0.00% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) 551 551 (714) SUNFLOWER SSA REVENUES 12-000-40-00-4012 IPROPERTY TAXES-SUNFLOWER SSA 1,370 1,370 7,531 18.19% 12-000-45-00-4500 1INVESTMENT EARNINGS 0 0 - 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES:SUNFLOWER SSA 1,370 1,370 7,531 18.19% SUNFLOWER SSA EXPENDITURES 12-112-54-00-5495 1 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANC - - 1 9,9861 0.00% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 1,370 1,370 7,531 18.19% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES - - 9,986 0.00% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) 1,370 1,370 (2,455) MOTOR FUEL TAX REVENUES 15-000-41-00-4112 MOTOR FUEL TAX 32,850 32,850 415,000 7.92% 15-000-41-00-4113 MFT HIGH GROWTH - - 39,197 0.00% 15-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 212 212 350 60.70% TOTAL REVENUES:MOTOR FUEL TAX 33,063 33,063 454,547 7.27% MOTOR FUEL TAX EXPENDITURES 15-155-56-00-5618 SALT - - 231,000 0.00% 15-155-56-00-5619 SIGNS - 35,000 0.00% 15-155-56-00-5632 PATCHING - 50,000 0.00% 15-155-56-00-5633 COLD PATCH - 11,660 0.00% 15-155-56-00-5634 1HOTPATCH - - 14,300 1 0.00% 15-155-60-00-6073 GAME FARM ROAD PROJECT - 110,000 0.00% 15-155-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - - 121,9001 0.00% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 33,063 33,063 5 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES - - 573,860 0.00% FUND SURPLUS DEFICIT 33,063 33,063 119,313 MUNICIPAL BUILDING REVENUES 16-000-42-00-4214 IDEVELOPMENT FEES 1,200 1,200 5,250 22.86% 16-000-42-00-4216 IBUILD PROGRAM PERMIT 300 300 - 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES:MUNICIPAL BUILDING 1,500 1,500 5,250 28.57% MUNICIPAL BUILDING EXPENDITURES 16-160-54-00-5405 IBUILDPROGRAM 3000 300 1 - 0.00% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 1,500 1,5001 5,250 1 28.57°/4 TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 300 300 1 - I FUND SURPLUS DEFICIT 1,200 1,2001 5,250 POLICE CAPITAL REVENUES 20-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES 2,250 2,250 10,500 21.43% 20-000-42-00-4217 WEATHER WARNING SIREN FEES - - 6,000 0.00% 20-000-43-00-4315 DUI FINES 594 594 6,000 9.91% 20-000-43-00-4316 ELECTRONIC CITATION FEE 62 62 650 9.54% 20-000-43-00-4340 SEIZED VEHICLE PROCEEDS - - 5,000 0.00% 20-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 2 2 50 4.24% 20-000-48-00-4880 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS - - 1,000 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES:POLICE CAPITAL 2,908 2,908 29,200 9.96% POLICE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 20-200-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - 2,500 0.00% 20-200-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANC 5,491 5,491 10,000 54.91% 20-200-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - - 2,500 0.00% 20-200-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT - - 20,000 0.00% 20-200-60-00-6070 VEHICLES 39,451 39,451 25,000 157.81% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 2,908 2,908 29,200 9.96% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 44,942 44,942 60,000 74.90'% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) (42,034) (42,034) (30,800) PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL REVENUES 21-000-42-00-4213 ENGINEERING CAPITAL FEE 700 700 6,500 10.77% 21-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES 5,350 5,350 24,500 21.84% 21-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMIT 1,000 1,000 - 0.00% 21-000-44-00-4418 MOWING INCOME 1,690 1,690 20,000 8.45% 21-000-45-00-4500 JINVESTMENT EARNINGS 1 1 - 1 0.00% 21-000-49-00-4922 1 TSFR FROM PARK&REC CAPITAL 208 208 2,500 1 8.33% TOTAL REVENUES:PW CAPITAL REVENUES 8,949 8,949 1 53,5001 16.73% PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 21-211-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM 1,000 1,000 - 0.00% 21-211-54-00-5448 FILING FEES - - 6,000 0.00% 21-211-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - 0.00% 21-211-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 4,500 0.00% 21-211-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - - 2,000 0.00% 21-211-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT - - 75,000 0.00% 21-211-60-00-6070 VEHICLES - - - 0.00% 21-211-92-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-PW BUILDING 2,435 2,435 30,074 8.10% 21-211-92-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-PW BUILDING 4,423 4,423 52,221 8.47% TOTAL FUND REVENUES +I . - 6 - UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 7,858 7,858 169,795 4.63% FUND SURPLUS DEFICIT 1,092 1,092 (116,295) PARK&RECREATION CAPITAL REVENUES 22-000-42-00-4215 PARKS CAPITAL FEES 850 850 3,250 26.15% 22-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 38 38 250 15.15% 22-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISC - - 40,000 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES:PARK&RECREATION CAPITAL 888 888 43,500 2.04% PARK&RECREATION CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 22-222-60-00-6035 RAINTREE PARK - 10,000 0.00% 22-222-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT - 40,000 0.00% 22-222-99-00-9921 TRANSFER TO PW CAPITAL 208 208 2,500 8.33% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 888 888 43,500 2.040/, TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 208 208 52,500 0.40'x0 FUND SURPLUS DEFICIT 680 680 9,000 CITY-WIDE CAPITAL REVENUES 23-000-41-00-4176 STATE GRANTS-SAFE RTE SCH - - 231,000 0.00% 23-000-42-00-4210 BUILDING PERMITS 13,400 0.00% 23-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES - - 20,000 0.00% 23-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMIT 6,040 6,040 - 0.00% 23-000-42-00-4222 ROAD CONTRIBUTION FEE - - 20,000 0.00% 23-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 14 14 - 0.00% 23-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS - - - 0.00% 23-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 34,944 34,944 419,332 8.33% 23-000-49-00-4905 LOAN PROCEEDS - - 600,000 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES:CITY-WIDE CAPITAL 40,999 40,999 1,303,732 3.14% CITY-WIDE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 23-230-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM 6,040 6,040 - 0.00% 23-230-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - 100,000 0.00% 23-230-60-00-6015 ROAD RESURFACING - 100,000 0.00% 23-230-60-00-6075 RIVER ROAD BRIDGE PROJECT - 600,000 0.00% 23-230-60-00-6092 SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL PROJECT - 231,000 0.00% 23-230-60-00-6094 1 ITEP KENNEDY RD BIKE TRAIL - 1 9,500 1 0.00% _ TOTAL FUND REVENUES 40,999 40,999 1,303,732 3.14% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 6,040 6,040 1,040,500 0.58%, FUND SURPLUS DEFICIT 34,959 34,959 263,232 7 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 42-000-40-00-4006 PROPERTY TAXES-2005A BOND 46,440 46,440 326,379 14.23% 42-000-42-00-4208 RECAPTURE FEES-WATER&SE WE 200 200 1,000 20.00% 42-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1 1 300 0.33% 42-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 8,289 8,289 99,465 8.33% TOTAL REVENUES:DEBT SERVICE 54,929 54,929 427,144 12.86% DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES 42-420-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES 214 214 963 22.22% 42-420-81-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2004C - - 95,000 0.00% 42-420-81-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2004C - 4,465 0.00% 42-420-82-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2005A - 205,000 0.00% 42-420-82-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2005A - 121,379 0.00% 42-420-98-00-8000 1PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2002 - - 75,000 0.00% 42-420-98-00-8050 1 INTEREST PAYMENT-2002 1,781 1,781 3,563 49.99% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 54,929 54,929 427,144 12.86% ir TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 1,995 1,995 505,370 0.39% FUND SURPLUS DEFICIT 52,934 52,934 78,226 WATER FUND REVENUES 51-000-40-00-4007 PROPERTY TAXES-2007A BOND 18,989 18,989 133,454 14.23% 51-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMIT 2,660 2,660 - 0.00% 51-000-43-00-4350 LATE PMT PENALTIES-WATER 65 65 - 0.00% 51-000-44-00-4424 WATER SALES 1,459 1,459 1,699,871 0.09% 51-000-44-00-4425 BULK WATER SALES - - 500 0.00% 51-000-44-00-4430 WATER METER SALES 3,513 3,513 26,250 13.38% 51-000-44-00-4440 WATER INFASTRUCTURE FEE 103 103 675,000 0.02% 51-000-44-00-4450 WATER CONNECTION FEE 13,010 13,010 126,250 10.30% 51-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 44 44 300 14.81% 51-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMP INS CONTRIBUTIONS 685 685 7,225 9.48% 51-000-46-00-4671 REIMB-LIFE INSURANCE 26 26 241 10.94% 51-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 99 99 - 0.00% 51-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 6,191 6,191 50,000 12.38% 51-000-49-00-4952 TRANSFER FROM SEWER 6,857 6,857 82,288 8.33% TOTAL REVENUES:WATER FUND 53,701 53,701 2,801,379 1.92% WATER OPERATIONS EXPENSES 51-510-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 26,260 26,260 370,000 7.10% 51-510-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 1,255 1,255 12,000 10.46% 51-510-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 2,653 2,653 39,852 6.66% 51-510-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 2,022 2,022 28,200 7.17% 51-510-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 5,575 5,575 103,966 5.36% 51-510-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 47 47 1,210 3.90% 51-510-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 456 456 7,201 6.33% 51-510-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 58 58 829 7.00% 51-510-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 1,346 1,346 6,000 22.43% 51-510-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE 6,769 6,769 32,462 20.85% 51-510-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM 2,660 2,660 - 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - - 2,000 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - - 1,600 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING - - 1,000 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5429 WATER SAMPLES 99 99 14,000 0.71% 51-510-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING - - 2,500 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - - 24,500 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5445 TREATMENT FACILITY SERVICES 130 130 100,000 0.13% 51-510-54-00-5448 FILING FEES - - 6,200 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING - - 22,000 0.00% 8 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget 51-510-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 298 298 1,250 23.83% 51-510-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 956 956 8,800 10.87% 51-510-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - - 2,000 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5480 UTILITIES - - 299,250 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5483 JULIE SERVICES - - 3,500 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 33 33 1,000 3.30% 51-510-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - - 10,000 0.00% 51-510-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES 214 214 1,600 13.38% 51-510-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 39 39 4,000 0.99% 51-510-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 90 90 21,425 0.42% 51-510-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 4,000 0.00% 51-510-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - 6,000 0.00% 51-510-56-00-5638 TREATMENT FACILITY SUPPLIES 5,465 5,465 165,000 3.31% 51-510-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - - 9,500 0.00% 51-510-56-00-5664 METERS&PARTS - - 46,000 0.00% 51-510-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - - 38,199 0.00% 51-510-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT - - 16,000 0.00% 51-510-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - - 116,000 0.00% 51-510-75-00-7502 GRANDE RESERVE COURT ORDER 22,989 22,989 160,923 14.29% 51-510-83-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2007A - - 10,000 0.00% 51-510-83-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2007A - - 123,454 0.00% 51-510-85-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PMT-2002 CAP APPREC 365,000 365,000 365,000 100.00% 51-510-86-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PMT-2003 DEBT CERT - - - 0.00% 51-510-86-00-8050 INTEREST PMT-2003 DEBT CERT - - 33,150 0.00% 51-510-87-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2006A - - 355,000 0.00% 51-510-87-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2006A - - 219,806 0.00% 51-510-88-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2005C - - 90,000 0.00% 51-510-88-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2005C - - 74,575 0.00% 51-510-89-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-IEPA 156300 - - 87,754 0.00% 51-510-89-00-8050 IINTEREST PAYMENT-IEPA 156300 - - 37,277 0.00% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 53,701 53,701 2,801,379 1.92% TOTAL FUND EXPENSES 444,414 444,414 3,085,983 14.40% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) (390,713) (390,713) (284,604) SEWER FUND REVENUES 52-000-40-00-4009 PROPERTY TAXES-2004B BOND 37,543 37,543 263,850 14.23% 52-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMIT - - - 0.00% 52-00-43-00-4350 LATE PMT PENALTIES-SEWER 4 4 - 0.00% 52-000-44-00-4435 SEWER MAINTENANCE FEES 383 383 728,280 0.05% 52-000-44-00-4455 SW CONNECTION FEES-OPS 200 200 5,100 3.92% 52-000-44-00-4456 SW CONNECTION FEES-CAPITAL 1,800 1,800 35,000 5.14% 52-000-44-00-4457 SW CONNECTION FEES-ROB ROY 288,000 288,000 600,000 48.00% 52-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 30 30 3,000 0.99% 52-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMP INS CONTRIBUTIONS 386 386 4,587 8.42% 52-000-46-00-4671 REIMB-LIFE INSURANCE - - - 0.00% 52-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 1,679 1,679 - 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES:SEWER FUND 330,025 330,025 1,639,817 20.13% SEWER OPERATIONS EXPENSES 52-520-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 14,411 14,411 210,000 6.86% 52-520-50-00-5020 OVERTIME - - 2,000 0.00% 52-520-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 1,389 1,389 21,290 6.53% 52-520-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 1,073 1,073 18,000 5.96% 52-520-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 3,686 3,686 63,595 5.80% 52-520-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 25 25 537 4.73% 52-520-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 318 318 4,687 6.78% 52-520-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 36 36 532 6.76% 9 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget 52-520-520-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 725 725 2,571 28.19% 52-520-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE 4,501 4,501 21,590 20.85% 52-520-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM - - - 0.00% 52-520-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - - 500 0.00% 52-520-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 43 43 500 8.56% 52-520-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING - - 100 0.00% 52-520-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - - 1,800 0.00% 52-520-54-00-5444 LIFT STATION SERVICES - - 15,000 0.00% 52-520-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 209 209 5,000 4.18% 52-520-54-00-5480 UTILITIES - - 42,000 0.00% 52-520-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 33 31 1,500 2.20% 52-520-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 26 26 4,000 0.65% 52-520-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES - 3,000 0.00% 52-520-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 39 39 2,500 1.58% 52-520-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 2,000 0.00% 52-520-56-00-5613 LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE - 10,000 0.00% 52-520-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 145 145 4,500 3.23% 52-520-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 4,500 0.00% 52-520-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - 3,000 0.00% 52-520-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - 10,000 0.00% 52-520-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - 29,211 0.00% 52-520-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - 60,000 0.00% 52-520-75-00-7500 LENNAR-RAINTREE SWR RECAP - 30,996 0.00% 52-520-75-00-7501 WINDETTE RIDGE-SEWER RECAPTURE - 150,000 0.00% 52-520-84-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2004B - 170,000 0.00% 52-520-84-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2004B - 93,850 0.00% 52-520-90-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2003IRRB - 100,000 0.00% 52-520-90-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2003IRRB - 66,248 0.00% 52-520-91-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2004A 175,000 0.00% 52-520-91-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2004A 18,738 0.00% 52-520-92-00-8000 PRINCIPAL 2011 REFUNDING - 0.00% 52-520-92-00-8050 INTEREST 2011 REFUNDING 318,147 0.00% 52-520-95-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-IEPA 01300 37,958 0.00% 52-520-95-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-IEPA 01300 1,022 0.00% 52-520-96-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-IEPA 115300 88,610 0.00% 52-520-96-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-IEPA 115300 18,440 52-520-99-00-9952 TRANSFER TO WATER 6,857 6,857 82,288 TOTAL FUND REVENUES 330,025 330,025 1,639,817 20.13% Milill TOTAL FUND EXPENSES 33,517 33,517 1,895,210 1.77% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) 296,508 296,508 (255,393) LAND CASH REVENUES 72-000-41-00-4173 JOSLAD GRANT-RAINTREE - - 400,000 0.00% 72-000-47-00-4703 AUTUMN CREEK 7,179 7,179 20,000 35.89% 72-000-47-00-4704 IBLACKBERRY WOODS - - 500 0.00% TOTAL REVENUES:LAND CASH 7,179 7,179 420,500 1.71% 10 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget LAND CASH EXPENDITURES 72-720-60-00-6032 MOSIER HOLDING COSTS - 12,000 0.00% 72-720-60-00-6036 RAINTREE VILLAGE 450 450 191,825 0.23% 72-720-60-00-6044 HOPKINS PARK 120,000 0.00% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 7,179 7,179 420,500 1.71% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 450 450 323,825 0.14% FUND SURPLUS DEFICIT 6,729 6,729 96,675 PARK&RECREATION REVENUES 79-000-44-00-4402 SPECIAL EVENTS 2,310 2,310 18,095 12.77% 79-000-44-00-4403 CHILD DEVELOPMENT 5,156 5,156 58,810 8.77% 79-000-44-00-4404 ATHLETICS AND FITNESS 36,929 36,929 113,095 32.65% 79-000-44-00-4441 CONCESSION REVENUE 13,379 13,379 30,000 44.60% 79-000-44-00-4443 HOMETOWN DAYS 1,325 1,325 175,000 0.76% 79-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 21 21 200 10.33% 79-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMP INS CONTRIBUTIONS 1,132 1,132 11,661 9.71% 79-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS - - - 0.00% 79-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 33,340 33,340 48,000 69.46% 79-000-48-00-4825 PARK RENTALS 6,017 6,017 25,000 24.07% 79-000-48-00-4846 SPONSORSHIPS/DONATIONS 2,429 2,429 14,700 16.52% 79-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 790 790 1,000 79.00% 79-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 79,657 79,657 955,886 8.33% TOTAL REVENUES:PARK&RECREATION 182,484 182,484 1,451,447 12.57% PARKS DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES 79-790-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 32,996 32,996 410,000 8.05% 79-790-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 652 652 17,000 3.84% 79-790-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 443 443 3,000 14.78% 79-790-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 3,245 3,245 43,693 7.43% 79-790-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 2,514 2,514 34,000 7.39% 79-790-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 7,393 7,393 126,842 5.83% 79-790-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 58 58 1,208 4.80% 79-790-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 635 635 9,179 6.92% 79-790-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 84 84 1,104 7.58% 79-790-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - - 2,600 0.00% 79-790-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - - 750 0.00% 79-790-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - - 3,780 0.00% 79-790-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - 4,500 0.00% 79-790-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - - 4,000 0.00% 79-790-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - - 2,500 0.00% 79-790-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE - - 17,500 0.00% 79-790-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL - - 4,100 0.00% 79-790-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES - - 300 0.00% 79-790-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - - 22,500 0.00% 79-790-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 2,250 0.00% 79-790-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - 500 0.00% 79-790-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - 50,500 0.00% 79-790-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - - 20,000 0.00% TOTAL EXPENDITURES:PARKS DEPT 48,020 48,020 781,806 6.14% RECREATION DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES 79-795-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 13,453 13,453 185,000 7.27% 79-795-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 1,233 1,233 25,000 4.93% 79-795-50-00-5020 OVERTIME - - 300 0.00% 79-795-50-00-5045 CONCESSION WAGES 2,879 2,879 12,500 23.04% 79-795-50-00-5046 PRE-SCHOOL WAGES 2,110 2,110 1 25,000 1 8.44% 79-795-50-00-5052 11NSTRUCTORS WAGES 1,181 N 1,181 1 25,000 1 4.72% 11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget 79-795-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 1,711 1,711 19,884 8.60% 79-795-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 1,543 1,543 16,000 9.64% 79-795-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 3,070 3,070 41,094 7.47% 79-795-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 29 29 473 6.13% 79-795-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 263 263 2,675 9.83% 79-795-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 25 25 325 7.58% 79-795-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - - 2,000 0.00% 79-795-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - - 1,000 0.00% 79-795-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING - - 27,000 0.00% 79-795-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - - 4,300 0.00% 79-795-54-00-5447 SCHOLARSHIPS - - 2,500 0.00% 79-795-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING - - 8,000 0.00% 79-795-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS - - 1,500 0.00% 79-795-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,581 1,581 60,000 2.63% 79-795-54-00-5480 UTILITIES - - 23,100 0.00% 79-795-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 178 178 4,500 3.96% 79-795-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANC - - 1,000 0.00% 79-795-54-00-5496 PROGRAM REFUNDS 6 6 7,000 0.09% 79-795-56-00-5602 HOMETOWN DAYS SUPPLIES 4,151 4,151 140,000 2.97% 79-795-56-00-5606 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 2,482 2,482 55,000 4.51% 79-795-56-00-5607 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 894 894 18,000 4.97% 79-795-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 273 273 3,000 9.10% 79-795-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,116 1,116 5,500 20.29% 79-795-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 2,000 0.00% 79-795-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - 500 0.00% 79-795-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - - 2,000 0.00% 79-795-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS - - 100 0.00% 79-795-56-00-5690 SUPPLIES-GRANT REIMBURSABL - - 500 0.00% 79-795-56-00-5695 IGASOLINE - - 3,210 TOTAL EXPENDITURES:RECREATION DEPT 38,177 38,177 724,961 TOTAL FUND REVENUES 182,484 182,484 1,451,447 12.57% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 86,196 86,196 1,506,767 5.72% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) 96,288 96,288 (55,320) RECREATION CENTER REVENUES 80-000-44-00-4440 PROGRAM FEES 6,987 6,987 100,000 6.99% 80-000-44-00-4441 CONCESSION REVENUE 890 890 12,500 7.12% 80-000-44-00-4444 MEMBERSHIP FEES 37,880 37,880 450,000 8.42% 80-000-44-00-4445 GUEST FEES 633 633 7,000 9.04% 80-000-44-00-4446 SWIM CLASS FEES 2,825 2,825 25,000 11.30% 80-000-44-00-4447 PERSONAL TRAINING FEES 1,215 1,215 10,000 12.15% 80-000-44-00-4448 TANNING SESSION FEES 222 222 2,500 8.88% 80-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 1,296 1,296 13,000 9.97% 80-000-48-00-4846 SCHOLARSHIPS/DONANTIONS 1,283 1,283 2,000 64.16% 80-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 21 21 500 4.10% TOTAL REVENUES:RECREATION CTR REVENUES 53,251 53,251 1 622,500 1 8.55% RECREATION CENTER EXPENSES 80-800-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 2,028 2,028 28,000 7.24% 80-800-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 6,409 6,409 100,000 6.41% 80-800-50-00-5046 PRE-SCHOOL WAGES 614 614 35,000 1.75% 80-800-50-00-5052 INSTRUCTORS WAGES 3,616 3,616 60,000 6.03% 80-800-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 685 685 10,181 6.73% 80-800-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 977 977 17,708 5.52% 80-800-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 100 100 1,200 8.33% 80-800-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 7 7 123 5.89% 80-800-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE - - - 0.00% 12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget 80-800-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - - 0.00% 80-800-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 200 0.00% 80-800-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING - 1,500 0.00% 80-800-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - - 3,600 0.00% 80-800-54-00-5447 SCHOLARSHIPS - - - 0.00% 80-800-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING - - 600 0.00% 80-800-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS - - 200 0.00% 80-800-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 819 819 20,000 4.09% 80-800-54-00-5480 UTILITIES - - 55,650 0.00% 80-800-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 37,198 37,198 236,000 15.76% 80-800-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANC 115 115 15,000 0.77% 80-800-54-00-5496 PROGRAM REFUNDS 174 174 5,500 3.16% 80-800-54-00-5497 PROPERTY TAX PAYMENT 29,400 29,400 70,000 42.00% 80-800-56-00-5606 PROGRAM SUPPLIES - - 15,000 0.00% 80-800-56-00-5607 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 694 694 7,000 9.92% 80-800-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES - - 2,600 0.00% 80-800-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - - 6,200 0.00% 80-800-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - - 0.00% 80-800-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - 1,000 0.00% 80-800-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 267 267 11,000 2.43% 80-800-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS - - 50 0.00% 80-800-56-00-5695 IGASOLINE - - 321 0.00% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 53,251 53,251 622,500 8.55% TOTAL FUND EXPENSES 83,103 83,103 703,633 11.81% FUND SURPLUS DEFICIT (29,852) (29,852) (81,133) LIBRARY OPERATIONS REVENUES 82-000-40-00-4005 PROPERTY TAXES-LIBRARY 98,981 98,981 700,000 14.14% 82-000-40-00-4012 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX IND TIF - - 7,500 0.00% 82-000-41-00-4120 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX 739 739 5,000 14.78% 82-000-41-00-4170 STATE GRANTS - - 17,200 0.00% 82-000-43-00-4330 LIBRARY FINES 994 994 13,000 7.64% 82-000-44-00-4401 LIBRARY SUBSCRIPTION CARDS 1,367 1,367 12,000 11.39% 82-000-44-00-4422 COPY FEES 204 204 3,000 6.80% 82-000-44-00-4440 PROGRAM FEES 93 93 2,000 4.63% 82-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 82 82 150 54.49% 82-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMP INS CONTRIBUTIONS 724 724 6,670 10.85% 82-000-46-00-4671' REIMB-LIFE INSURANCE 59 59 636 9.32% 82-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 131 131 2,000 6.55% 82-000-48-00-4824 DVD RENTAL INCOME 349 349 4,500 7.76% 82-000-48-00-4832 MEMORIALS 142 142 2,000 0.00% 82-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 33 33 - 0.00% 82-000-48-00-4881 SALE OF BOOKS - - - 0.00% 82-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 9,733 9,733 41,978 23.19% TOTAL REVENUES:LIBRARY 113,630 113,630 817,634 13.90% LIBRARY OPERATIONS EXPENDITURES 82-820-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 18,707 18,707 245,000 7.64% 82-820-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 14,207 14,207 195,000 7.29% 82-820-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 1,803 1,803 26,692 6.76% 82-820-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 2,463 2,463 38,000 6.48% 82-820-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 5,101 5,101 102,877 4.96% 82-820-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 36 36 1,410 2.57% 82-820-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 469 469 6,826 6.87% 82-820-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 54 54 770 6.96% 82-820-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 1,035 1,035 4,286 24.15% 82-820-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE 8,698 8,698 37,692 23.08% 13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) %of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget 82-820-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 500 0.00% 82-820-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING - 100 0.00% 82-820-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS - 8,500 0.00% 82-820-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING - 1,000 0.00% 82-820-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 78 72 14,000 0.56% 82-820-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 963 n6 29,000 3.32% 82-820-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - - 2,000 0.00% 82-820-54-00-5468 AUTOMATION 3,385 3,38 35,000 9.67% 82-820-54-00-5480 UTILITIES - - 15,750 0.00% 82-820-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - - 0.00% 82-820-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANC - 5,000 0.00% 82-820-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES - 749 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 8,000 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - 7,500 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5671 LIBRARY PROGRAMMING - 2,000 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5680 ADULT BOOKS - - 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5681 JUVENILE BOOKS - - 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5682 REFERENCE BOOKS - - 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5683 AUDIO BOOKS - - 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5684 COMPACT DISCS&OTHER MUSIC - - 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5685 DVD'S - 2,000 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5698 MEMORIALS&GIFTS - 2,000 0.00% 82-820-56-00-5699 MISCELLANEOUS - 250 0.00% 82-820-70-00-7799 CONTINGENCIES - - 1,000 0.00% 82-820-99-00-9983 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY DEBT SERVICE 1,8220 1,822 1,511 120.58% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 113,630 113,630 817,634 13.90% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 58,820 58,820 794,413 7.40% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) 54,809 54,809 23,221 LIBRARY DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 83-000-40-00-4015 PROPERTY TAXES-DEBT SERVICE 113,248 113,248 795,488 14.24% 83-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - - 300 0.00% 83-000-49-00-4982 TRANSFER FROM LIBRARY OPS 1,822 1,822 1,511 120.58% TOTAL REVENUES:LIBRARY DEBT SERVICE 115,070 115,070 797,299 134.81% LIBRARY DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES 83-830-83-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2005B - - 290,000 0.00% 83-830-83-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2005B - 309,125 0.00% 83-830-84-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2006 - 150,000 0.00% 83-830-84-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2006 1 - - 46,363 0.00% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 115,070 115,070 797,299 14.43% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES - - 795,488 0.00% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) 115,070 115,070 1,811 LIBRARY CAPITAL REVENUES 84-000-42-00-4214 IDEVELOPMENT FEES 2,500 2,500 16,250 15.38% 84-000-45-00-4500 1 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 0 0 100 0.16% TOTAL REVENUES:LIBRARY CAPITAL 2,500 2,500 16,350 0 LIBRARY CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 84-840-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - - 0.00% 84-840-56-00-5683 AUDIO BOOKS 0.00% 84-840-56-00-5684 COMPACT DISCS&OTHER MUSIC - 0.00% 84-840-56-00-5685 DVD'S - 0.00% 84-840-56-00-5686 BOOKS 13,474 0.00% 14 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUDGET REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31,2012 ACTUALS BY MONTH(Cash Basis) of Fiscal Year 8.33% Year-to-Date ANNUAL ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION May-12 Totals BUDGET %of Budget TOTAL FUND REVENUES 2,500 2,500 16,350 15.29% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES - - 13,474 0.00% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) 2,500 2,500 1 2,876 COUNTRYSIDE TIF REVENUES 87-000-40-00-4087 1PROPERTY TAXES-CNTRYSDE - - 4,500 0.00% 87-000-45-00-4500 1INVESTMENT EARNINGS 234 234 2,000 11.72% TOTAL REVENUES:COUNTRYSIDE TIF 234 234 6,500 11.72% COUNTRYSIDE TIF EXPENDITURES 87-870-54-00-5420 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES - - 1,000 0.00% 87-870-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES 375 0.00% 87-870-80-00-8000 PRINCIPLE PAYMENT-2005 - - 180,000 0.00% 87-870-80-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT-2005 62,334 62,334 124,668 50.00% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 234 234 6,500 3.61% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES 62,334 62,334 306,043 20.37% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) (62,099) (62,099) (299,543) DOWNTOWN TIF REVENUES 88-000-40-00-4088 IPROPERTY TAXES-DOWNTOWN TI 3,159 3,159 70,000 4.51% 88-000-45-00-4500 1INVESTMENT EARNINGS 3 3 150 1.96% TOTAL REVENUES:DOWNTOWN TIF 3,162 3,162 70,150 4.51% DOWNTOWN TIF EXPENDITURES 88-880-54-00-5420 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES - - 1,500 0.00% 88-880-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - 10,000 0.00% 88-880-60-00-6000 PROJECT COSTS - 10,000 0.00% 88-880-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - 20,000 0.00% TOTAL FUND REVENUES 3,162 3,162 70,150 4.51% TOTAL FUND EXPENDITURES - - 41,500 0.00% FUND SURPLUS(DEFICIT) 3,162 3,162 28,650 15 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS For the Period Ending May 31,2012 * % of May YTD YTD to FY 2013 Actual Actual Budget Budget GENERAL FUND (01) Revenues Local Taxes Property Taxes 388,308 388,308 14.3% 2,721,487 Municipal Sales Tax 177,588 177,588 7.6% 2,325,000 Non-Home Rule Sales Tax 127,336 127,336 0.0% 1,500,000 Electric Utility Tax - - 0.0% 603,432 Natural Gas Tax - - 0.0% 296,514 Telecommunications Tax 39,153 39,153 8.0% 490,000 Telephone Utility Tax 1,422 1,422 6.0% 23,500 Cable Franchise Fees 51,537 51,537 22.4% 230,000 Hotel Tax 3,893 3,893 7.8% 50,000 Amusement Tax 2,097 2,097 1.6% 134,000 Admissions Tax - - 0.0% 104,500 Business District Tax 20,290 20,290 6.8% 300,000 Auto Rental Tax 838 838 8.4% 10,000 Total Taxes 812,462 812,462 9.2% 8,788,433 Intergovernmental State Income Tax 263,968 263,968 20.0% 1,320,000 Local Use Tax 17,811 17,811 7.3% 242,400 Road& Bridge Tax 26,133 26,133 15.4% 170,000 Personal Property Replacement Tax 2,230 2,230 13.9% 16,000 Other Intergovernmental 1,107 1,107 9.9% 11,200 Total Intergovernmental 311,249 311,249 17.7% 1,759,600 Licenses and Permits Liquor Licenses 1,773 1,773 4.4% 40,000 Building Permits 21,493 21,493 17.0% 126,600 Other Licenses & Permits 60 60 2.2% 2,700 Total Licenses &Permits 23,325 23,325 13.8% 169,300 Fines and Forfeits Traffic Fines 4,338 4,338 4.6% 95,000 Administrative Adjudication 1,580 1,580 6.1% 26,000 Police Tows 3,500 3,500 4.4% 80,000 Late PMT Penalties - Garbage 14 14 0 Total Fines and Forfeits 9,432 9,432 4.7% 201,000 16 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS For the Period Ending May 31,2012 * % of May YTD YTD to FY 2013 Actual Actual Budget Budget GENERAL FUND (01) Charges for Services Garbage Surcharge 156 156 0.0% 1,021,784 Collection Fee -YBSD - - 0.0% 151,500 Other Services 5 5 0.1% 5,500 Total Charges for Services 161 161 0.0% 1,178,784 Investment Earnings 584 584 18.8% 3,100 Reimb/Miscellaneous/Other Financing Sources Reimb - Legal Expenses 1,100 1,100 0.0% - Reimb - Engineering Expenses 41,145 41,145 0.0% - Reimb - Traffic Signal - 0 0.0% 15,000 Reimb - Health Ins Contributions 10,159 10,159 7.5% 135,892 Other Reimbursements 51,046 51,046 104.2% 49,000 Rental Income 875 875 10.9% 8,000 Miscellaneous Income - 0 0.0% 3,000 Total Miscellaneous 104,325 104,325 49.5% 210,892 Total Revenues and Transfers 1,261,538 1,261,538 10.2% 12,311,109 Expenditures Administration 53,357 53,357 6.8% 782,327 Salaries 24,454 24,454 7.3% 333,395 Benefits 18,288 18,288 6.6% 275,732 Contractual Services 9,386 9,386 5.9% 160,250 Supplies 1,229 1,229 9.5% 12,950 Finance 18,099 18,099 5.3% 340,535 Salaries 12,991 12,991 7.0% 185,000 Benefits 4,135 4,135 6.7% 62,135 Contractual Services 700 700 0.8% 88,150 Supplies 273 273 5.2% 5,250 Police 259,505 259,505 6.8% 3,840,577 Salaries 145,390 145,390 6.6% 2,215,500 Overtime 5,429 5,429 6.0% 90,000 Benefits 104,167 104,167 8.9% 1,169,457 Contractual Services 4,435 4,435 2.1% 213,850 Supplies 83 83 0.1% 151,770 17 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS For the Period Ending May 31,2012 * % of May YTD YTD to FY 2013 Actual Actual Budget Budget GENERAL FUND (01) Community Development 20,344 20,344 4.4% 461,426 Salaries 14,236 14,236 5.7% 248,000 Benefits 5,378 5,378 4.9% 109,797 Contractual Services 695 695 0.8% 92,350 Supplies 34 34 0.3% 11,279 PW- Street Ops & Sanitation 37,931 37,931 2.0% 1,920,452 Salaries 19,701 19,701 7.0% 280,000 Overtime 224 224 1.5% 15,000 Benefits 10,773 10,773 7.3% 147,530 Contractual Services 6,914 6,914 0.5% 1,390,020 Supplies 318 318 0.4% 87,902 Administrative Services 252,065 252,065 6.2% 4,034,550 Salaries - - 0.0% 5,000 Benefits 96,662 96,662 17.2% 562,389 Contractual Services 22,780 22,780 1.2% 1,895,500 Supplies - - 0.0% 5,000 Contingencies - - 0.0% 50,000 Transfers Out 132,623 132,623 8.7% 1,516,661 Total Expenditures and Transfers 641,300 641,300 5.6% 11,379,867 Variance 620,238 620,238 931,242 * May represents 8%of the fiscal year 18 DATE: 06/07/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 11:46:16 GENERAL LEDGER ACTIVITY REPORT F-YR: 13 ID: GL440000.WOW ACTIVITY FOR FISCAL PERIOD 01 PER. JOURNAL # ENTRY DATE ITEM TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION VENDOR CHECK INVOICE DEBIT CREDIT 01-110-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 AP-120522 05/16/2012 05 ADMIN-VIDEO SERVICES DIANE GIANNELLI OAKL 513382 155 50.00 GJ-ZAJE0IC 05/04/2012 43 AT&T MAINTENANCE BILLING 490.80 TOTAL PERIOD 01 ACTIVITY 540.80 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 1,666.67 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 20,000_00 ENDING BALANCE 540.80 01-120-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 GJ-120531FE 06/01/2012 03 APRIL CC FEES UB 395 33.41 06/01/2012 11 APRIL ANALYSIS FEES 3.91 TOTAL PERIOD 01 ACTIVITY 37.32 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 3,333.34 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 40,000.00 ENDING BALANCE 37.32 01-210-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 GJ-120531FE 06/01/2012 01 APRIL CC FEES PD 382 54.05 GJ-ZAJE01C 05/04/2012 44 KC SHERIFF'S OFFICE RANGE FY13 333.32 TOTAL PERIOD 01 ACTIVITY 387.37 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 416.67 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 5,000.00 ENDING BALANCE 387.37 01-220-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 500.00 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 6,000.00 ENDING BALANCE 0.00 01-410-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 83.34 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 1,000.00 ENDING BALANCE 0.00 01-640-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 GJ-ZAJE01C 05/04/2012 10 DAC ANNUAL FEES 450.00 TOTAL PERIOD 01 ACTIVITY 450.00 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 41.67 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 500.00 ENDING BALANCE 450.00 15-155-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 0.00 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 0.00 ENDING BALANCE 0.00 20-200-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 208.34 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 2,500.00 ENDING BALANCE 0.00 DATE: 06/07/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 11:46:16 GENERAL LEDGER ACTIVITY REPORT F-YR: 13 ID: GL440000.WOW ACTIVITY FOR FISCAL PERIOD 01 PER. JOURNAL # ENTRY DATE ITEM TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION VENDOR CHECK INVOICE DEBIT CREDIT 21-211-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 0.00 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 0.00 ENDING BALANCE 0.00 23-230-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 8,333.34 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 100,000.00 ENDING BALANCE 0.00 51-510-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 AP-120508 05/03/2012 17 WATER OP-MAY HOSTING SERVICES ITRON 513288 239942 456.23 GJ-120531FE 06/01/2012 05 APRIL CC FEES UB 395 447.74 06/01/2012 13 APRIL ANALYSIS FEES 52.37 TOTAL PERIOD 01 ACTIVITY 956.34 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 733.34 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 8,800.00 ENDING BALANCE 956.34 52-520-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 GJ-120531FE 06/01/2012 07 APRIL CC FEES UB 395 187.12 06/01/2012 15 APRIL ANALYSIS FEES 21.88 TOTAL PERIOD 01 ACTIVITY 209.00 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 416.67 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 5,000.00 ENDING BALANCE 209.00 79-790-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 375.00 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 4,500.00 ENDING BALANCE 0.00 79-795-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 GJ-120514PR 05/30/2012 40 APRIL CC FEES CHARGED 5/6/12 775.63 AP-120524 05/16/2012 01 REFEREE EDDIE A. HOLMAN 208855 050812 140.00 05/16/2012 02 REFEREE PAUL MCDOWELL 208857 050312 140.00 05/16/2012 03 REFEREE BRUCE MORRICK 208859 050812 35.00 05/16/2012 04 REFEREE TRACY ROBINSON 208866 050312 140.00 05/16/2012 05 REFEREE TRACY ROBINSON 208866 050812 140.00 05/16/2012 06 REFEREE RONALD V. WOZNY 208868 050312 140.00 05/16/2012 07 REFEREE JASON ZALESKI 208869 050812 70.00 TOTAL PERIOD 01 ACTIVITY 1,580.63 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 5,000.00 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 60,000.00 ENDING BALANCE 1,580.63 80-800-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 GJ-120514PR 05/30/2012 42 APRIL CC FEES CHARGED 5/6/12 775.62 DATE: 06/07/2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 11:46:16 GENERAL LEDGER ACTIVITY REPORT F-YR: 13 ID: GL440000.WOW ACTIVITY FOR FISCAL PERIOD 01 PER. JOURNAL # ENTRY DATE ITEM TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION VENDOR CHECK INVOICE DEBIT CREDIT 01 AP-120524 05/16/2012 33 MAY PEST CONTROL FIRST ILLINOIS SYSTE 208852 9442 43.00 TOTAL PERIOD 01 ACTIVITY 818.62 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 1,666.67 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 20,000.00 ENDING BALANCE 818.62 82-820-54-00-5462 (E) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 01 05/01/2012 BEGINNING BALANCE 0.00 AP-120514 05/08/2012 02 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT CHARGE SOUND INCORPORATED 103157 R113770 709.50 05/08/2012 03 MAY ELEVATOR MAINTENACE THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATO 103159 3000158407 218.03 GJ-120531FE 06/01/2012 17 WIRE FEE 5/7/12 15.00 06/01/2012 19 WIRE FEE 5/14/12 20.00 TOTAL PERIOD 01 ACTIVITY 962.53 0.00 MONTHLY REVISED BUDGET 2,416.67 ANNUAL REVISED BUDGET 29,000.00 ENDING BALANCE 962.53 GRAND TOTAL 5,942.61 0.00 TOTAL DIFFERENCE 5,942.61 0.00 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� 6 Legal ❑ II#13 EST. 1&36 ■ Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator ■ r� _© Consultant E] ADM 2012-40 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Cash Statement for April 2012 Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CASH AND INVESTMENT SUMMARY-as of April 30,2012 CASH Cash-Operations Cash-Special Purpose IL Funds IL Funds Operations Aurora Special Purpose Grand Old Second Castle E-Pay Acct IMET Totals Old Second Castle IMET Earthmovers Totals Totals General Fund 01-General (2,988,341) 12,788 2 2,408,961 (566,590) 2,145 - 15,736 50 17,932 (548,658) Special Revenue Funds 15-Motor Fuel Tax - - - 899,316 - 899,316 899,316 72-Land Cash (294,558) (294,558) - - (294,558) 85-Fox Industrial TIF - - - - - 87-Countryside TIF 214,273 969,853 1,184,126 693,936 693,936 1,878,062 88-Downtown TIF 261,109 - 261,109 - - 261,109 11-Fox Hill SSA 17,388 17,388 17,388 12-Sunflower SSA 12,488 12,488 12,488 Debt Service Fund 42-Debt Service 87,510 87,510 87,510 Capital Funds 16-Municipal Building (577,874) (577,874) (577,874) 20-Police Capital 228,494 228,494 228,494 21-Public Works Capital 63,026 63,026 - - 63,026 23-City-Wide Capital 112,165 112,165 55,883 55,883 168,048 Enterprise Funds 51-Water 350,503 25,049 1 166,074 541,628 - - 541,628 52-Sewer 2,606,605 7,689 - 2,614,294 2,614,294 Agency Funds 90-Developer Escrow 147,584 - 147,584 147,584 95-Escrow Deposit 219,598 30,955 - - 250,553 - - - - - 250,553 Total City Funds 459,970 76,481 3 3,544,888 4,081,342 696,081 899,316 71,619 50 1,667,066 5,748,408 Distribution% 8.00% 1.33% 0.00% 61.67% 12.11% 15.64% 1.25% 0.00% Library Funds 82-Library Operations 5,357 - 79,839 - 85,196 - - 328,885 25 328,910 414,105 83-Library Debt Service (1,829) 7 (1,822) - - - - (1,822) 84-Library Capital - - - 1,375 - 1,375 1,375 Totals 3,528 - 79,846 83,374 1,375 328,885 25 330,284 413,658 Distribution% 0.85% 19.30% 0.33% 79.51% Park and Recreation Funds 79-Parks and Recreation - 382,048 - 382,048 - - 25 25 382,073 22-Park&Rec Capital 61,221 61,221 147,985 147,985 209,206 80-Recreation Center (224,862) (224,862) - - - (224,862) Totals 218,407 218,407 147,985 25 148,010 3669417 Distribution% 59.61% 40.39% 0.01% 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� $ 06 Legal El #14 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ -_� City Administrator ■ Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El Gwn sw �© Community Development ❑ COW 2012-01 � Police F-1 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Library Board 2011-2012 Annual Report Meeting and Date: COW—June 12, 2012 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: none Council Action Requested: none, informational item Submitted by: Michelle Pfister Library Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Library Board of Trustees Beth Gambro YORKVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY Barb Johnson Sandy Lindblom Gail Gaebler ANNUAL Carol LaChance REPORT Robert Allen 2011 -2012 Jo Ann Gryder Susan Chacon Judy Somerlot LIBRARY IC PUBL YORKVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY 402 Game Farm Rd. Yorkville,IL 60560 (630)553-4354 Fax(630)553-0823 Current library statistics, wvrw.yorkvil le.l ib.ii.us information, and - financial budget. Total patron visits 77,695 Number of patron library 8,590 cards Library Expenses Children attending programs 3,558 Salaries and Wages 431,182 Adults attending programs 913 Resources Owned: Books 49,678 Benefits 141,975 DVD's 1,874 Audio Recordings 3,056 Contractual Services 80,874 Items borrowed from other librar- 20,228 Supplies 19,407 ies for our patrons Items loaned to other libraries 11,195 Total $673,438 from our collection Items checked out by patrons 141,718 Newspaper subscriptions owned 5 Micro Film Kendall County Record 136 Illinois US Census 18 Magazine subscriptions owned 93 Pieces of sheet music owned 1,247 Dial-a-Story activity(#of calls) 3,567 New items added this fiscal year 3,036 Library Revenues Taxes 697,473 Debt Service—Bond Development Fees—Books 7,600 Revenue 718,978 Copy Fees 3,444 Expense 720,800 Subscription Cards 1 1,814 Rental DVD's 5,416 Library Operations Reserve $328,811 Rental Building 2,695 Program/Fee/Exam Proctoring 337 Fines 12,864 Memorials/Gifts 6,119 Interest 393 Grants 17,231 Miscellaneous Income 815 Total $766,201 Yorkville Public Library 2011 - 2012 ILLINOIS PUBLIC LIBRARY ANNUAL REPORT (IPLAR) IDENTIFICATION (1.1 - 1.37) ey�„ As Secretary of State and State Libreean,.I commend our Illinois public IlInfin an the outstanding services they provida that enhance and enrich the lives of our citizens. 1 truly appreciate the efforts and hard work of the 600*Illinois public libraries in cony pletinS the Illinois Public Library Annual Report(IPLAR). The collected data provides a coocise snapshot of the current states of Illinois public library services ad programs. In addition,the collected Information Is shared nationally through the Federal-Stato Coeperathre System(FSCS)for Public Ubrary Data. As a result,Illinois librarians have - ' the opportunity to compare themselves wigs their Illlools'peers and librarians through- � out the nation. Again,Thank you very much for your hard wort In completing the current IPLAR,and for all fife good wort you do In Trooping our patrons educated,entertained,and enlightened. Sincereli,,Jesse White 1.1 ISL Control# [PLSC 151,PLSC 701] 30727 1.2 ISL Branch# [PLSC 151, PLSC 701] 00 1.3a FSCS ID [PLSC 150, PLSC 700] IL0600 1.3b FSCS_SEQ [PLSC 700] 002 1.4a Legal Name of Library [PLSC 152] Yorkville Public Library 1.4b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 1.5a Facility Street Address [PLSC 153] 902 Game Farm Road 1.5b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 1.6a Facility City [PLSC 154] Yorkville 1.6b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 1.7a Facility Zip [PLSC 155] 60560 1.7b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 1.8a Facility Zip+4 [PLSC 156] 1135 1.8b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 1.9a Mailing Address [PLSC 157] 902 Game Farm Road 1.9b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 1.10a Mailing City [PLSC 158] Yorkville http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 -� ---r--- i ar,%,c vi L.1 1.10b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 1.1 la Mailing Zip [PLSC 159] 60560 1.11 b If this locked question's answer has changed, then enter the updated answer here. 1.12a Mailing Zip+4 [PLSC 1601 1135 1.12b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 1.13a Library Telephone Number[PLSC 162] 630-553-4354 1.13b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 1.14a Library FAX Number 630-553-0823 1.14b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 1.15 WWW Home Page [PLSC 1631 http://www.yorkville.lib.il.us Library Director's Information 1.16 Name Michelle Pfister 1.17 Title Library Director 1.18 Library Director's E-mail mpfister @Yorkville.lib.il.us 1.19a Type of library CI- City 1.19b If this locked question's answer has changed,then CI -City enter the updated answer here. 1.19c Legal Basis Code [PLSC 2011 CI 1.19d Geographic Code [PLSC 2041 CI1 1.20 Is your library a combined public and school No library? 1.21 Does your library contract with another library to No RECEIVE ALL your library services? 1.22 IF YES, list the names(s) of the library(ies)with whom you contract(Enter each in a separate repeating field) 1.23a County in which the administrative entity is located Kendall [PLSC 161] 1.23b If this locked question's answer has changed,then Kendall enter the updated answer here. 1.23c Metropolitan Status Code [PLSC 7101 NO 1.24 Did the administrative entity's legal service area boundaries change during the past year? [PLSC No 205, 75 ILCS 5/4-10(5), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(2)] 1.25 IF YES,indicate the reason for the boundary N/A change 1.26a Population residing in tax base(Use the latest 16921 official federal census figure) [PLSC 208] 1.26b If this locked question's answer has changed,then N/A enter the updated answer here. 1.27 If the population has changed from the prior year's N/A answer,then indicate the reason. http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnw 1 m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 -� ---1 - I ar J Vl G1 1.28a This library is currently a member of what Illinois RAILS library system? 1.28b If this locked question's answer has changed,then NONE enter the updated answer here. 1.28c Interlibrary Relationship Code [PLSC 200] ME 1.29 Does this library have an organized collection of printed or other library materials, or a combination Yes thereof? 1.30 Does this library have paid staff? Yes 1.31 Does this library have an established schedule in which services of the staff are available to the Yes public? 1.32 Does the library have the facilities necessary to Yes support such a collection, staff, and schedule? 1.33 Is this library supported in whole or in part with Yes public funds? 1.34 Does this public library meet ALL the criteria of the PLSC public library definition? [PLSC 2031 (If you answered YES to each question 1.29 -1.33, then answer this question Yes.If you answered NO Yes to any question 1.29 -1.33,then answer this question No.) 1.35 Number of Central Libraries [PLSC 209] 1 1.36 Outlet Type Code [PLSC 7091 CE 1.37 Administrative Structure Code [PLSC 202] SO BRANCHES AND BOOKMOBILE OUTLETS (2.1 -2.18) 2.1 Total number of bookmobiles [PLSC 211 &PLSC 0 712] 2.2 Total number of branch libraries [PLSC 210] 0 NOTE: For questions 2.3 through 2.16, ONLY INCLUDE branch libraries and bookmobile outlets. DO NOT include the main/central library. 2.3a Branch or Bookmobile Legal Name [PLSC 702] na 2.3b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 2.4 ISL Control# [PLSC 701] na 2.5 ISL Branch# [PLSC 701] na 2.6a Street Address [PLSC 703] na 2.6b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 2.7a City [PLSC 704] na 2.7b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 2.8a Zip [PLSC 705] N/A 2.8b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 2.9a Zip+4 [PLSC 706] N/A http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 2.9b If this locked question's answer has changed,then N/A enter the updated answer here. 2.10a County [PLSC 707] 2.10b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 2.11a Telephone [PLSC 708] N/A 2.11b If this locked question's answer has changed,then N/A enter the updated answer here. 2.12a Square Footage [PLSC 711] N/A 2.12b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 2.12c Indicate the reason for the change/variance in square footage for this annual report as compared to N/A the previous annual report. 2.13 Outlet Type Code [PLSC 709] 2.14 Metropolitan Status Code [PLSC 710] 2.15 FSCS ID [PLSC 700] na 2.16 FSCS_SEQ [PLSC 700] N/A 2.17 Total public service hours PER YEAR for this 0 branch or bookmobile [PLSC 7131 2.18 Total number of weeks, during the fiscal year,this branch or bookmobile was open for service to the 0 public [PLSC 714] ANNUAL REPORT DATA (3.1 - 3.7) 3.1 Fiscal Year Start Date(mm/dd/year) [PLSC 206] 05/01/2011 3.2 Fiscal Year End Date(mm/dd/year) [PLSC 207] 04/30/2012 3.3 Number of months in this fiscal year 12 3.4 Name of person preparing this annual report Michelle Pfister 3.5 Telephone Number 630-553-4354 3.6 FAX Number 630-553-0823 3.7 E-Mail Address mpfister @yorkville.lib.il.us REFERENDA (4.1 - 4.12) 4.1 Was your library involved in a referendum in FY2011/2012? NO Include each type of referendum presented to the voters below: 4.2 Referendum Type N/A 4.3 If Other,what was the referendum type? N/A 4.4 Referendum Date(mm/dd/year) N/A 4.5 Passed or Failed? N/A 4.6 Effective Date(mm/dd/year) N/A If in the last year, or in the period before filing this report,the library board took action to a) convert to public library district status by approval of the corporate authority [75 ILCS 16/10-15]; and/or b)the public library district annexed additional territory in an unincorporated area by backdoor referendum[75 ILCS 16/15-5,et seq.];and/or c)your http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 public library district took any other action by backdoor referendum, indicate the effective date of the action. 4.7 Conversion-Effective Date (mm/dd/year) N/A 4.8 Annexation-Effective Date (mm/dd/year) N/A 4.9 Other(please specify) N/A 4.10 Other-Effective Date(mm/dd/year) N/A 4.11 Other(please specify) N/A 4.12 Other-Effective Date (mm/dd/year) N/A CURRENT LIBRARY BOARD (5.1 - 5.14) [75 ILCS 5/4-1, et seq., 75 ILCS 16/30-5, et seq.] NOTE: This information is used for directory purposes and for meeting the annual legal reporting requirements of public library districts. Report the most current infornation 5.1 Total number of board seats 9 5.2 Total number of vacant board seats 0 5.3 In accordance with current Illinois Library Laws, subject to the type of public library,this public library board of trustees attests that the current Yes board is legally established, organized, and the terms of office for library trustees are all unexpired. 5.4 IF NO,please explain Members 5.5 Name Beth Gambro 5.6 Trustee Position President 5.7 Present Term Ends (mm/year) 5/2012 5.8 Telephone Number 630-553-1477 5.9 E-mail Address bgambro @sbcglobal.net 5.10 Home Address 104 Blackberry 5.11 City Yorkville 5.12 State Illinois 5.13 Zip 60560 5.14 Zip+4 1135 5.5 Name Barbara Johnson 5.6 Trustee Position Vice-President 5.7 Present Term Ends(mm/year) 5/2014 5.8 Telephone Number 630-553-7389 5.9 E-mail Address barbjjohnson @aol.com 5.10 Home Address 501 W Ridge St. 5.11 City Yorkville 5.12 State Illinois 5.13 Zip 60560 5.14 Zip+4 1135 5.5 Name Sandy Lindblom 5.6 Trustee Position Treasurer 5.7 Present Term Ends(mm/year) 5/2014 http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 5.8 Telephone Number 630-553-6214 5.9 E-mail Address slind55378 @aol.com 5.10 Home Address 408 W. Fox Street 5.11 City Yorkville 5.12 State Illinois 5.13 Zip 60560 5.14 Zip+4 1135 5.5 Name Gail Gaebler 5.6 Trustee Position Secretary 5.7 Present Term Ends(mm/year) 5/2013 5.8 Telephone Number 630-553-5188 5.9 E-mail Address Gaebler3 @sbcglobal.net 5.10 Home Address 202 E. Main 5.11 City Yorkville 5.12 State Illinois 5.13 Zip 60560 5.14 Zip+4 1135 5.5 Name Carol La Chance 5.6 Trustee Position Other 5.7 Present Term Ends(mm/year) 5/2012 5.8 Telephone Number 630-553-7169 5.9 E-mail Address carol.lachance @sbcglobal.net 5.10 Home Address 427 E. Spring 5.11 City Yorkville 5.12 State Illinois 5.13 Zip 60560 5.14 Zip+4 1135 5.5 Name Robert Allen 5.6 Trustee Position Other 5.7 Present Term Ends(mm/year) 5/2013 5.8 Telephone Number 630-553-2788 5.9 E-mail Address allen3boys @aol.com 5.10 Home Address 511 Blaine Street 5.11 City Yorkville 5.12 State Illinois 5.13 Zip 60560 5.14 Zip+4 1135 5.5 Name Jo Ann Gryder 5.6 Trustee Position Other 5.7 Present Term Ends(mm/year) 5/2014 5.8 Telephone Number 630-553-5340 5.9 E-mail Address jogryder@hotmail.com 5.10 Home Address 609 N Bridge St. 5.11 City Yorkville 5.12 State Illinois 5.13 Zip 60560 http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwlm5wOk45usvpabq fl)/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 --- � -J ---r--- i i vi v i 5.14 Zip+4 1135 5.5 Name Susan Chacon 5.6 Trustee Position Other 5.7 Present Term Ends (mm/year) 5/2013 5.8 Telephone Number 630-596-3711 5.9 E-mail Address susanchacon@hotmail.com 5.10 Home Address 1444 Aspen Lane 5.11 City Yorkville 5.12 State Illinois 5.13 Zip 60560 5.14 Zip+4 1135 5.5 Name Judy Somerlot 5.6 Trustee Position Other 5.7 Present Term Ends(mm/year) 5/2012 5.8 Telephone Number 630-385-2074 5.9 E-mail Address somerdl @comast.net 5.10 Home Address 937 Stony Creek Lane 5.11 City Yorkville 5.12 State Illinois 5.13 Zip 60560 5.14 Zip+4 1135 FRIENDS GROMFOUNDATION(6.1 - 6.2) 6.1 Does your library have a"friends" group? Yes 6.2 Does your library have a library foundation? No FACILITY/FACILITIES (7.1 - 7.2) 7.1a Total square footage of the main library building 40,000 [PLSC 711] 7.1b If this locked question's answer has changed,then enter the updated answer here. 7.1c Indicate the reason for the change/variance in square footage for this annual report as compared to N/A the previous annual report. 7.2 Total square footage of the branch library building N/A (s), if applicable 7.2b Indicate the reason for the change/variance in square footage for this annual report as compared to N/A the previous annual report. ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (8.1 - 8.13) PROPERTY 8.1 What is the estimated current fair market value for the library's real estate(land and buildings $9,100 including garages, sheds, etc.)? http://coBect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 8.2 During the last fiscal year, did the library acquire any real and/or personal property? [75 ILCS 5/4-10 No (4), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(3)] IF YES,how was the property acquired?(Check all that apply) 8.3 Purchase No 8.4 Legacy No 8.5 Gift No 8.6 Other No 8.7 Provide a general description of the property acquired. 8.8 What is the estimated replacement cost for the library's furniture, equipment, and vehicles? $882,263 FISCAL ACCUMULATIONS 8.9 Does your library have fiscal accumulations (reserve funds, outstanding fund balances, etc.)? Yes [75 ILCS 5/4-10(7), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(4)] 8.10 IF YES,then prepare a statement that details the dollar amounts) and the reason(s)for the fiscal $328.811 Library Operation accumulations. [75 ILCS 5/4-10(7) , 75 ILCS 16/30 Reserve -65(a)(4)] LIABILITIES 8.11 Does your library have any outstanding liabilities including bonds,judgments, settlements, etc.? [75 Yes ILCS 5/4-10(8), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(5)] 8.12 IF YES, what is the total amount of the outstanding liabilities? [75 ILCS 5/4-10(8), 75 ILCS 16/30-65 $7,925,000 (a)(5)] 8.13 IF YES,then prepare a statement that identifies each outstanding liability and its specific dollar Bond for Building Library amount. [75 ILCS 5/4-10(8), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a) (5)] OPERATING RECEIPTS BY SOURCE (9.1 - 9.22) [75 ILCS 5/4-10(l), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(6)] Operating receipts are the monies received and utilized during the fiscal year to support the provision of ongoing, day-to-day library services. Exclude:revenue for major capital expenditures, contributions to endowments,revenue passed through to another agency, funds unspent in previous fiscal years(e.g. carryover), and tax anticipation warrants. NOTE: Round answers to the nearest whole dollar. LOCAL GOVERNMENT 9.1 Local government [PLSC 300] (except capital income from bond sales which must be reported in $673,145 13.1 a only) STATE GOVERNMENT-Exclude: Federal funds distributed by the State of Illinois http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwlm5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 9.2 Per capita grant $17,231 9.3 Equalization aid grant $0 9.4 Personal property replacement tax $4,997 9.5 Educate and Automate grants (an IL State Library 0 grant) 9.6 Other $19,331 9.7 If Other,please specify TIF 9.8 Total State Government Funds (9.2 9.3 +9.4+ $41,559 9.5 + 9.6) [PLSC 301] FEDERAL GOVERNMENT-Include: Federal funds distributed by the State of Illinois (e.g., LSTA grants paid directly to your library) 9.9 LSTA funds received 0 9.10 E-Rate funds received 0 9.11 Other federal funds received 0 9.12 If Other,please specify 9.13 Total Federal Government Funds (9.9+ 9.10+ $0 9.11) [PLSC 3021 OTHER INCOME 9.14 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation grant monies 0 received 9.15a Other receipts intended to be used for operating $51,497 expenditures 9.15b Other non-capital receipts placed in"reserve funds" $328.811 9.16 TOTAL all other receipts (9.14 + 9.15a, BUT NOT $51,497 9.15b) [PLSC 303] TOTAL OPERATING RECEIPTS [75 ILCS 5/4-10(l), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(6)] 9.17 TOTAL receipts ( 9.1 + 9.8 + 9.13 + 9.16) [PLSC $766,201 304] 9.18 The library safeguards its funds using which option? Per 75 ILCS 5/4-9 AND 75 ILCS 16/30-45(e), the Surety Bond library shall provide the Illinois State Library a copy of the library's certificate of insurance at the time the library's annu 9.19 What is the coverage amount of either the surety bond OR the insurance policy/insurance $568,000 instrument? 9.20a Is the amount of the surety bond in compliance with library law? [75 ILCS 5/4-9, 75 ILCS 16/30- Yes 45(e)] 9.20b Is the amount of the insurance policy or other insurance instrument in compliance with library Yes law? [75 ILCS 5/4-9, 75 ILCS 16/30-45(e)] 9.21 The designated custodian of the library's funds is: Library Treasurer http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 9.22 Is this library's annual tax levy/fiscal appropriation subject to "tax caps" [the Property Tax Extension Yes Limitation Law, 35 ILCS 200/18-185, et seq.]? OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY (10.1 - 10.4) [75 ILCS 5/4-10(2), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(6)] Operating expenditures are the current and recurrent costs necessary to support the provision of library services. Include: Significant costs, especially benefits and salaries,that are paid by other taxing agencies(government agencies with the authority to levy tax) "on behalf of the library may be included if the information is available to the reporting agency. Only such funds that are supported by expenditure documents (such as invoices, contracts,payroll records, etc.) at the point of disbursement should be included. Exclude: Do not report the value of free items, estimated costs, and capital expenditures. NOTE: Round answers to the nearest whole dollar. 10.1 Salaries and wages for all library staff[PLSC 3501 $431,182 10.2 Fringe benefits, for all library staff,paid for from either the library's or the "municipal corporate $141,975 authority's" appropriation [PLSC 3511 10.3 Total Staff Expenditures (10.1 + 10.2) [PLSC 352] $573,157 10.4 If this library answered question 10.2 as "zero" or N/A "N/A" then choose an answer from the drop-down. MATERIALS EXPENDITURES (11.1 - 11.4) [75 ILCS 5/4-10(2), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(6)] Include: All materials in all formats (e.g.,print,microform, electronic)whether purchased, leased or licensed. Exclude: Charges or fees for interlibrary loans and Expenditures for document delivery. NOTE: Round answers to the nearest whole dollar. 11.1 Printed Materials [PLSC 353] $8,118 11.2 Electronic Materials [PLSC 354] $5,867 11.3 Other Materials [PLSC 355] $2,037 11.4 TOTAL Materials Expenditures (11.1 + 11.2+ 11.3) [PLSC 356] $16,022 OTHER OPERATING EXPENDITURES (12.1 - 12.3) [75 ILCS 5/4-10(2), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(6)] Exclude: Purchases of major fixed assets (Report in Capital Expenditures) NOTE: Round answers to the nearest whole dollar. http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 12.1 All other operating expenditures not included above$84,259 [PLSC 357] 12.2 TOTAL operating expenditures (10.3 -+ 11.4 i $673,438 12.1) [PLSC 358] 12.3 Children's Materials Expenditures $3,316 CAPITAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES (13.1 - 13.7) [75 ILCS 5/4-10(1)&(2), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(6)] Include funds received for: site acquisitions; new building(s); additions to or renovations of existing buildings; furnishings, equipment, and initial collections for new buildings, building additions, or building renovations; computer hardware and software used to support library operations,to link to networks, or to run information products;new vehicles; or other one-time major projects. Exclude revenue for: replacement and/or repair of existing furnishings and equipment, regular purchase of library materials, investments for capital appreciation, income passed through to another agency(e.g., fines), and funds unspent in previous fiscal year(e.g., carryover). NOTE: Round answers to the nearest whole dollar. CAPITAL REVENUE 13.1a Local Government: Capital Income from Bond $718,978 Sales 13.lb Local Government: Other 0 13.1 c Total Local Government(13.1 a+ 13.1 b) [PLSC $718,978 400] 13.2 State Government [PLSC 401] 0 13.3 Federal Government [PLSC 402] 0 13.4 Other [PLSC 403] 0 13.5 If Other,please specify 13.6 Total Capital Revenue (13.1c+ 13.2 + 13.3 + 13.4) $718,978 [PLSC 404] CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 13.7 Total Capital Expenditures [PLSC 405] $720,800 PERSONNEL (14.1 - 14.50) Include all positions funded in the library's budget whether those positions are filled or not. Report position figures as of the last day of the fiscal year. Include only paid employees-- do NOT include volunteers. Report personnel in the appropriate categories based on the type of library work being performed rather than on an employee's educational qualifications. The FTE (full-time equivalent/employee) calculator utilizes the IMLS/PLSC national standard for a full-time work week as 40 hours per week. Illinois libraries should report each staff member's hours per week based on the number of hours worked.If your library considers 35-39+hours per week as a full-time work week,then report using those figures. DO NOT inflate the hours your library considers as a full-time work week in order to force http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwlm5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 the resulting calculation to equal 1 FTE. For national comparison purposes,your library must report the total hours per week based on your local standard. For example,for an Illinois library that considers 37.5 hours per week as a full-time work week,the FTE calculation reported nationally will be .9375 or .94 rather than 1.00. Group A: Librarians with MASTER'S DEGREES (OR DOCTORATES OR CERTIFICATES OF ADVANCED STUDIES) FROM AN AMERICAN LIRARY ASSOCIATION ACCREDITED PROGRAM OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION STUDIES. [PLSC 250] 14.1 Position Title N/A 14.2 Primary Work Area Code N/A 14.3 Secondary Work Area Code [OPTIONAL] N/A 14.4 Education Code N/A 14.5 Sex N/A 14.6 Hourly Rate N/A 14.7 Total Hours/Week N/A 14.8 Total Group A: FTE ALA-MLS (14.7/40) [PLSC 0.00 250] Group B: Other Librarians. Include employees with the TITLE OF LIBRARIAN who EITHER have other types of library education(non-American Library Association accredited library degrees;undergraduate library science majors or minors) OR do paid work that usually requires professional training and skill in the theoretical or scientific aspects of library work, or both, as distinct from its mechanical or clerical aspects. 14.9 Position Title Director 14.10 Primary Work Area Code LDIR 14.11 Secondary Work Area Code [OPTIONAL] N/A 14.12 Education Code HS 14.13 Sex F 14.14 Hourly Rate $29.76 14.15 Total Hours/Week 40 14.9 Position Title Director of Technical Services 14.10 Primary Work Area Code CAT 14.11 Secondary Work Area Code [OPTIONAL] N/A 14.12 Education Code LTA 14.13 Sex F 14.14 Hourly Rate $23.00 14.15 Total Hours/Week 40 14.9 Position Title Youth Service Director 14.10 Primary Work Area Code CHD 14.11 Secondary Work Area Code [OPTIONAL] YAS 14.12 Education Code LTA 14.13 Sex F 14.14 Hourly Rate $24.15 14.15 Total Hours/Week 40 14.9 Position Title Circulation Manager 14.10 Primary Work Area Code CIR 14.11 Secondary Work Area Code [OPTIONAL] N/A http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 14.12 Education Code HS 14.13 Sex F 14.14 Hourly Rate $21.00 14.15 Total Hours/Week 40 14.9 Position Title Adult Service Director 14.10 Primary Work Area Code ADT 14.11 Secondary Work Area Code [OPTIONAL] N/A 14.12 Education Code LTA 14.13 Sex F 14.14 Hourly Rate $19.00 14.15 Total Hours/Week 40 14.16 Total Group B: FTE Other Librarians (14.15 /40) 5.00 14.17 Total FTE Librarians (14.8 + 14.16] [PLSC 251] 5.00 OTHER PAID EMPLOYEES WHO PERFORM OTHER TYPES OF LIBRARY WORK Group C: Full-time/part-time administrative support specialists (personnel director, business manager,public relations, other non-library specialists), information technology professionals (IT director,webmaster), other technical, and clerical employees. 14.18 Total hours worked in a typical week by all Group 257 C employees 14.19 Minimum hourly rate actually paid(convert annual $9.00 salary to hourly rate) 14.20 Maximum hourly rate actually paid(convert annual $15.75 salary to hourly rate) 14.21 Total FTE Group C employees (14.18 /40) 6.43 Group D:Full-time/part-time pages or shelvers 14.22 Total hours worked in a typical week by all Group N/A D employees 14.23 Minimum hourly rate actually paid(convert annual N/A salary to hourly rate) 14.24 Maximum hourly rate actually paid(convert annual N/A salary to hourly rate) 14.25 Total FTE Group D employees (14.22/40) 0.00 Group E: Full-time/part-tune building maintenance, security or plant operation employees 14.26 Total hours worked in a typical week by all Group 60 E employees 14.27 Minimum hourly rate actually paid(convert annual $16.86 salary to hourly rate) 14.28 Maximum hourly rate actually paid(convert annual $19.07 salary to hourly rate) 14.29 Total FTE Group E employees (14.26/40) 1.50 14.30 Total FTE Other Paid Employees from Groups C, 7.93 D, and E(14.21 + 14.25 + 14.29) [PLSC 252] 14.31 Total FTE Paid Employees (14.17+ 14.30) [PLSC 12.93 253] http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 Librarian Vacancies Include only those budgeted librarian positions vacant on the last day of this fiscal year for which there was an active search while the position remained vacant. 14.32 Position Title N/A 14.33 Primary Work Area Code N/A 14.34 Education Code N/A 14.35 Total Hours/Week N/A 14.36 Number of Weeks Vacant during FY2010/11 N/A 14.37a Annual Salary Range Minimum N/A 14.37b Annual Salary Range Maximum N/a Newly Created Librarian Positions Include any newly created librarian positions which were created in FY2011/2012. 14.38 Position Title N/A 14.39 Primary Work Area Code N/A 14.40 Education Code N/A 14.41 Total Hours/Week N/A 14.42 Current Status: Filled or Unfilled N/A 14.43 Date Filled(mm/year, if applicable) N/A Eliminated Librarian Positions An eliminated librarian position is one that was budgeted for in FY2010/11 but was not in the budget for FY2011/12. 14.44 Position Title N/A 14.45 Primary Work Area Code N/A 14.46 Education Code N/A 14.47 Total Hours/Week N/A 14.48 Date Eliminated(mm/year) N/a 14.49 Last Annual Salary Paid N/A 14.50 Reason Eliminated(i.e. lack of funds or need, etc.) N/A SERVICE HOURS/LIBRARY VISITS (15.1 - 15.20) Monday . 15.1 Open? Yes 15.2 Based on a typical Monday,how many hours was the library open on this day? 9.00 Tuesday 15.3 Open? Yes 15.4 Based on a typical Tuesday,how many hours was 9.00 the library open on this day? Wednesday 15.5 Open? Yes 15.6 Based on a typical Wednesday,how many hours 9.00 was the library open on this day? Thursday 15.7 Open? Yes 15.8 Based on a typical Thursday,how many hours was the library open on this day? 9.00 Friday http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 15.9 Open? Yes 15.10 Based on a typical Friday,how many hours was the 7.00 library open on this day? Saturday 15.11 Open? Yes 15.12 Based on a typical Saturday,how many hours was 6.00 the library open on this day? Sunday 15.13 Open? No 15.14 Based on a typical Sunday,how many hours was 0 the library open on this day? 15.15 Based on a typical week,how many DAYS in that week was the CENTRAL library open mornings 6 (Midnight- 11:59 a.m.)? 15.16 Based on a typical week,how many DAYS in that week was the CENTRAL library open afternoons 6.00 (Noon- 5:59 p.m.)? 15.17 Based on a typical week,how many DAYS in that week was the CENTRAL library open evenings 4 (6:00 p.m. - 11:59 p.m.)? 15.18a Total public service hours PER YEAR FOR THE 2,690 MAIN/CENTRAL LIBRARY [PLSC 713] 15.18b Total public service hours PER YEAR FOR ALL iijfi> iui,�S & BOOKMOBILES N/A [PLSC] 15.18c Total scheduled public service hours PER YEAR FOR ALL SERVICE OUTLETS (15.18a+ 2,690 15.18b) [PLSC 500] 15.19 Total annual visits/attendance in the library [PLSC 77,695 501] 15.20 Total number of weeks, during the fiscal year,the MAIN/CENTRAL LIBRARY was open for service 52 to the public [PLSC 714] PROGRAMS & ATTENDANCE (16.1 - 16.8) Exclude: (1)Library activities delivered on a one-to-one basis,rather than to a group, such as one-to-one literacy tutoring,resume writing assistance,homework assistance, and mentoring activities. (2)Programs sponsored by other groups that use library facilities. 16.1 Total Number of Adult Programs 74 16.2 Adult Program Attendance 913 16.3 Total Number of Young Adult Programs [PLSC 73 602] 16.4 Young Adult Program Attendance [PLSC 605] 619 16.5 Total Number of Children's Programs [PLSC 601] 134 16.6 Children's Program Attendance [PLSC 604] 2,939 16.7 Total Number of Library Programs(16.1 + 16.3 + 281 16.5) [PLSC 600] http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwlm5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 16.8 Total Library Program Attendance(16.2+ 16.4+ 4,471 16.6) [PLSC 603] REGISTERED BORROWERS (17.1 - 17.4) 17.1 Total number of resident borrower's cards in force as of the last day of the fiscal year. A resident borrower is a citizen who resides within your library's legal service area and/or is taxed for(or owns property within) library service within your 8,381 library's taxing boundaries which entitles that citizen to hold a resident borrower's card from your library.Do<font color=black>NOT</font> include reciprocal borrowers. 17.2a Total number of non-resident borrower's cards in force as of the last day of the fiscal year. A non- resident borrower is a citizen who does not reside within your library's legal service area and is not 209 taxed for library service within your library's taxing boundaries. Instead that citizen pays a fee directly to your library for library use and services. Do NOT include reciprocal borrowers. 17.2b What was the total amount of the fees collected from the sale of non-resident borrower's cards 11,814 during the past fiscal year? 17.3 Total number of registered borrowers as of the last 8,590 day of the fiscal year. (17.1 + 17.2a) [PLSC 503] 17.4 Is your library's registered borrower/patron file Yes purged a minimum of one time every three years? RESOURCES OWNED (18.1 - 18.15) [75 ILCS 5/4-10(3), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(6)] This area does NOT cover all materials for which expenditures were reported. Report only items that the library has acquired as part of the collection and cataloged whether purchased, licensed, or donated as gifts. Books 18.1 Held at end of FY2011/12 [PLSC 450] 49,678 Back Files (Retrospective Holdings):Newspapers (Print format only) 18.2 Held at end of FY2011/12 5 18.3 Are these counts a volume count OR a title count Title Back Files (Retrospective Holdings): Magazines/Periodicals/Serials(Print format only) 18.4 Held at end of FY2011/12 1,315 18.5 Are these counts a volume count OR a title count Volume 18.6 Total Print Materials (18.1 + 18.2 + 18.4) 50,998 [75 ILCS 5/4-10(3), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(6)] Current Subscriptions:Newspapers/Magazines/Periodicals/Serials(Print format only) 18.7 Held at end of FY2011/12 [PLSC 460] 93 http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 E-books 18.8 Held at end of FY2011/12 [PLSC 45 1] 0 Audio Recordings: Physical Units 18.9a Held at end of FY2011/12 [PLSC 452] 3,056 Audio Recordings: Downloadable Titles 18.9b Held at end of FY2011/12 [PLSC 453] 0 DVDs/Videos: Physical Units 18.10a Held at end of FY2011/12 [PLSC 454] 1,874 [75 ILCS 5/4-10(3) and 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(6)] DVDs/Videos: Downloadable Titles 18.10b Held at end of FY2011/12 [PLSC 455] 0 Licensed Databases Report the number of licensed databases acquired through payment or formal agreement, by source of access. Each database should be counted individually even if access to several databases is supported through the same vendor interface. Exclude: Subscriptions to individual electronic serial titles should be reported in question 18.8 NOT in 18.12 - 18.15. 18.11 Local License negotiated by the local library 5 [PLSC 456] 18.12 State License negotiated by the Illinois State 22 Library [PLSC 457] 18.13 Other consortia within the state or region-- License negotiated by regional library system(s) and/or N/A other cooperative(s) [PLSC 458] 18.14 Total licensed Databases (18.11 + 18.12 + 18.13) 27 [PLSC 459] Children's Holdings 18.15 Children's Holdings 25,778 USE OF RESOURCES (19.1 - 19.13) [75 ILCS 5/4-10(3), 75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(6)] Report for the library's entire fiscal year 19.1 Number of adult materials loaned 62,908 19.2 Number of children's materials loaned [PLSC 551] 78,810 19.3 Total number of materials loaned (19.1 + 19.2) 141,718 [PLSC 550] Report circulation, including renewals, by the material types below. Include both physical and electronic format circulation if applicable. 19.4 Books 114,667 19.5 Videos/DVDs 10,387 19.6 Audios (include music) 11,838 19.7 Magazines/Periodicals 2,823 19.8 Other Formats 2,003 http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 19.9 TOTAL (Sum of 19.4-19.8) 141,718 19.10 Number of interlibrary loans loaned to other 11,195 libraries [PLSC 5521 19.11 Number of interlibrary loans borrowed from other 20,228 libraries [PLSC 553] 19.12 Does your library participate in reciprocal Yes borrowing? 19.13 IF YES,report the number of materials loaned 0 REFERENCE QUESTIONS (20.1 - 20.3) Number of reference questions, for the fiscal year, asked at the department. [PLSC 502] 20.1 Adult Department 10,400 20.2 Children's Department 5,200 20.3 TOTAL (20.1 +20.2) [PLSC 502] 15,600 AUTOMATION (21.1 - 21.5) How many of the following does your library have? Windows/PC Compatible Computers 21.1 Total number of ALL computers in the library 64 21.2 Total number of PUBLIC USE (Internet and non- 36 Internet accessible) computers in the library 21.3 Is your library's catalog automated? Yes 21.4 Is your library's catalog accessible via the web? Yes 21.5 Does your library have a telecommunications No messaging device for the hearing imparied? INTERNET (22.1 -22.20) 22.1 Does your library have Internet access? Yes 22.2 Does your library have wireless Internet access? Yes What Internet provider(s) does your library use? (Check all that apply) 22.3 Illinois Century Network(ICN) Yes 22.4 Other No 22.5 If your library is NOT a participant in the Illinois N/A Century Network(ICN),please indicate why: 22.6 What type(s) of Internet connections) is/are used by your library? (Check all that apply) If you need help, call your Internet service provider(ISP). DSL No Cable No Wireless Yes Satellite No Fiber Yes Leased Line No Network(State, Regional,Municipal) No http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 Dial-up No Don't Know No Other No N/A No 22.7 What is the maximum speed of your library's 6.3 Mbps (T-2) Internet connection? (Select one) 22.8 If Other,please specify 22.9 Has your library board adopted an Internet public Yes access policy? 22.10 How many Internet computers does your library 28 have available for public use? [PLSC 650] 22.11 Report the number of in-library users of public 35,000 Internet computers in a year [PLSC 651] 22.12 Report the annual number of views of your library's 31,200 homepage 22.13 Does your library provide instruction(workshops, Yes classes)to patrons on the use of the Internet? 22.14 Does your library utilize Internet filters? Yes 22.15 IF YES,when did your library start using filters? 9/2004 (mm/year) IF YES, which Internet stations have filters? (Check all that apply) 22.16a Staff-All No 22.16b Staff- Some No 22.17a Public -All No 22.17b Public- Some No 22.18a Children-All No 22.18b Children- Some No 22.19a Young adult-All No 22.19b Young adult- Some No 22.20a Adult-All No 22.20b Adult- Some No E-RATE (23.1 - 23.3) 23.1 Did your library apply directly for E-rate No (telecommunications discounts)for FY2011/12? 23.2 IF YES,what is the dollar amount(either as discounts/credits on your telecommunications bills 0 or as direct payments to your library)that your library was awarded for FY2011/12? 23.3 Why did your library NOT participate in the E-rate N/A program? STAFF DEVELOPMENT & TRAINING (24.1 - 24.3) 24.1 How much money did your library spend on staff development and training this fiscal year?(Round $118 answer to the nearest whole dollar.) 24.2 Does this include travel expenses? Yes http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 24.3 How many hours of training did employees receive 104 this year? SUGGESTED QUESTIONS FOR FUTURE IPLARS (25.1) 25.1 What information is not currently asked on the Illinois Public Library Annual Report(IPLAR)that you would be interested in if it were collected? PUBLIC LIBRARY DIS'T'RICT SECRETARY'S AUDIT (26.1) [75 ILCS 16/30-65(a)(1),(c)(d)] 26.1 Public Library District Secretary's Audit(Submit in paper format;there is no electronic version). A Secretary's Audit must be prepared on your library's letterhead and contain the following information: 1. Your library's name and address (should be on the library's letterhead). 2. The following text: "This is to testify that we have examined the Secretary's minutes and other records for the past year and find they are in order and have no errors or discrepancies for FY2011/12." NOTE: If there ARE any errors or discrepancies,please list and explain fully. 3. The signatures of two trustees who were appointed by the President to audit the Secretary's records. 4. The date completed. CERTIFICATION PAGE Click here to print certification form. IPLAR SUBMISSION REMINDERS Follow these steps for IPLAR submission: 1. Click on the Status tab. 2. Click on the Unanswered Questions tab which defaults to View Required Unanswered Questions. Supply answers for these required questions. 3. Click on the Edit Checks tab and resolve edit checks. Explain pragmatically why this year's answer is equal to,less than,or more than the previous year's answer. 4. Click on the Submit Survey tab and click on the green Submit Survey button NOTE: All required unanswered questions must be answered and all edit checks must contain narrative notes in order for the survey to electronically submit. IL STATE LIBRARY WILL COMPLETE 27.1 EAV 1 [ISL] 27.2 EAV 2 [ISL] 27.3 EAV 3 [ISL] 27.4 EAV 4 [ISL] http://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfptnwl m5wOk45usvpabgf))/SurveyReport.aspx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 27.5a EAV TOTAL (27.1 +27.2 +27.3 +27.4) [ISL] 0 27.5b EAV in$1,000 (27.5a/ 1,000) [ISL] 0 27.6 Tax Rate 1 [ISL] 27.7 Tax Rate 2 [ISL] 27.8 Tax Rate 3 [ISL] 27.9 Tax Rate 4 [ISL] 27.10 Average Tax Rate [ISL] 0 httn://collect.btol.com/(S(ndwfntnwl m5wOk45usvnabaf)1/SurvevRenort.asnx?Impersonate... 5/11/2012 Inventory 2006 furnishing and equipping the library from bond money Furniture cost Equipment Lighting 600,000.00 Furnishing used from existing library 10,000.00 Total 610,000.00 Items purchased in 2007/2008 Cart 498.00 2 Dictionary holders 39.00 Telephone System 11,984.00 Computers 14,679.00 toaster Oven 199.00 Shelving 1,109.00 Theatre Post 457.00 Coin bill tower 2,095.00 Computers 4,746.00 Checkpoint system 112,227.00 Garment rack 460.00 Steel organizer for workroom 306.00 Shelves 923.00 Microwave&refrigerator 908.00 cabinets 298.00 2 Laminators 506.00 Laser Printer 603.00 Printer 342.00 Tables for meeting room 1,700.00 Shedder 200.00 Coin and bill tower 2,095.00 Bar code scanner 516.00 Coffee maker 99.00 Headphones 357.00 Fireside art piece 2,500.00 Framed historical pictures 1,400.00 Signs 414.00 Christmas decoration 644.00 2 Microwaves 318.00 Wireless-G access point 174.00 Speakers for projectors 50.00 Projector 1,000.00 Projector stand 300.00 Easel 78.00 File Cabinet 439.00 Palm tree 188.00 Receipt Printer 203.00 Display sign 136.00 Digital Reader Printer 9,987.00 Konica Minolta color printer 7,936.00 Konica Minolta second floor 4,192.00 Phillips heart start 2,119.00 Book truck 961.00 2 Rocking chairs 434.00 Oak fumiture children's 407.00 Lamp 200.00 Art picture winter 350.00 Art picture summer 350.00 Art picture fall 350.00 Coat rack 203.00 Laser printer 1,209.00 3 Smoker Stations 504.00 2 Microwaves 318.00 Projector, speakers, stand 50.00 Laptop 1,085.00 2 Picnic tables 618.00 Total 196,463.00 Items Purchased In 200812009 Ivy plant 98.00 Rugs, plants, wall hangings 1,066.00 Easel bookshelves, bean bag chairs 796.00 Wall clocks 261.00 Book truck 548.00 Signs-Pollock 1,560.00 Shelves 899.00 2 Receipt I printers 598.00 Easel 186.00 Heart start cabinet 200.00 Konica Minolta scanner/copier 4,048.00 3 Rocking Chairs 450.00 Activity table 356.00 Book truck 1,001.00 4 Floor lamps 900.00 Activity center 419.00 10 lap top computers 7,000.00 rocking chair 200.00 Security Camera's 9,525.00 2 Floor lamp 502.00 Table lamp 187.00 Motorized roller shade 2,218.00 Magnifier Reader 2,898.00 Disk repair unit 1,421.00 2 Bookshelves 700.00 Total 38,037.00 Items Purchased in 2009-2010 Kids Chairs 290.00 Lectern 300.00 Easel 200.00 Hands on Activity Panel 264.00 Framed Print 217.00 Microscope Slide Set 452.00 Microscope 434.00 Printer 119.00 Various Die Cuts 254.00 Fax Machine 1,090.00 Window Signs Poblocki 85.00 Sign Holders 284.00 Die Cuts 1 61.00 Ellision Equipment 856.00 Chairs 1 289.00 Folding Tables 392.00 Folding Chairs 589.00 2 Computers 1,655.00 2 Chairs 264.00 Table 312.00 6 Chairs 792.00 4 Computers 2,773.00 Total 11,972.00 Items Purchased in 2010-2011 Teens Display Cabinet 535.00 Coat Tree 210.00 Stereo Listening Center 317.00 Pelco Cani DVR 1,198.00 Recorder 178.00 Meeting Room Electric Screen 5,900.00 Board Room Electric Screen 5,900.00 Book Truck 412.00 Wood Book Truck 210.00 6 Computers 4,353.00 1 Computer 719.00 APC battery 183.00 Stereo Listening Center 317.00 4 Computers 2,820.00 Wood Window Blinds 2,289.00 Bean bag Chairs 250.00 ems Purchasec in 2011- Total ems books FN 06 610,000.00 FN 07-08 196,463.00 FN 08-09 38,037.00 FN 09-10 11,972.00 FN 10-11 25,791.00 FN 11-12 0.00 Books etc 1,501,472.00 Total 2,383,735.00 Total Items Total Retail Value Books $27.00 49,678 1,341,306.00 CD's $40.00 1,684 67,360.00 Music CD's $16.00 1,372 21,952.00 Magazines $6.00 1,315 7,890.00 Micro film $48.00 154 7,392.00 DVD's $23.00 1,874 43,102.00 Sheet Music $10.00 1,247 12,470.00 Total 1,501,472.00