Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Public Works Packet 2012 05-15-12
Co.o United City of Yorkville '" 800 Game Farm Road EST. _ 1835 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 -c Telephone: 630-553-4350 O L Fax: 630-553-7575 �C E AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING *Tuesday, May 15, 2012 6:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: March 12, 2012 and April 17, 2012 Minutes for Reconsideration: 1. October 18, 2011 2. November 15, 2011 3. January 17, 2012 New Business: 1. PW 2012-28 Water Department Reports for February, March & April 2012 2. PW 2012-29 Kendall Marketplace Improvements —Pay Request 3. PW 2012-30 Game Farm Road Update 4. PW 2012-31 LOC/Bond Call Policy Old Business: Additional Business: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 15, 2012 6:00 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. March 12, 2012 ❑ Approved ❑ As presented ❑ With corrections 2. April 17, 2012 ❑ Approved ❑ As presented ❑ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR RECONSIDERATION: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. October 18, 2011 2. November 15, 2011 3. January 17, 2012 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2012-28 Water Department Reports for February, March& April 2012 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2012-29 Kendall Marketplace Improvements—Pay Request ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2012-30 Game Farm Road Update ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. PW 2012-31 LOC/Bond Call Policy ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� 6 Legal ❑ Minutes EST. 1&36 Finance El Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator El r� 9 _© Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the Public Works Committee—March 12, 2012 Meeting and Date: Public Works— 5/15/12 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 4/17/12 Action Taken: Tabled Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Committee Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville,IL 60560 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING City Hall, Conference Room Tuesday,March 12, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Alderman George Gilson Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Diane Teeling Alderman Larry Kot OTHER CITY OFFICIALS PRESENT: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, City of Yorkville Eric Dhuse, Public Works Director Brad Sanderson, EEI OTHERS PRESENT: Deb Kaiser-Windett Ridge Kathleen Neddo -Windett Ridge Robert Delo - Maximum Property/Windett Ridge Rose Delo - Maximum Property/Windett Ridge Citizens Comments: Alderman Gilson thanked the residents for being in attendance. Minutes for Correction or Approval: The minutes for the February 21, 2012 were approved. New Business: PW 2012-23 MFT General Maintenance Appropriation Resolution for FY 2013 - Mr. Dhuse stated this is a yearly appropriation the city has to do. Mr. Dhuse stated this year salt is half of the normal order which saved the city$85,000. Alderman Gilson asked if funds can be shifted around. Mr. Dhuse stated yes, within the appropriate group to a certain extent. Mr. Dhuse said the city can re appropriate funds, if needed. Mr. Dhuse said this is what the city plans on spending. He stated this is to give us an idea, so that the city doesn't overspend. Alderman Kot asked how this fiscal year is going. Mr. Dhuse stated very good. Alderman Kot asked about patching. Mr. Dhuse said in April the asphalt plants open and the city plans on addressing that at that time. This item is moved to consent. PW 2012-24 Property Maintenance Violation Updates_Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble stated the first item is Pets One and they are in violation with an odor in their facility and the facility next door. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKPfs4 said she did an inspection in January and there were animals that didn't meet regulations. Ms. Barksdale-No blelfysti said she took pictures of reptiles and rodents that were loose in the facility and the city sent a violation notice. She stated when she went back in February, animals were caged and under control and the smell was better. Ms. Barksdale-Nobleli said the city received another call the smell had returned and she went back and it was very strong. They are scheduled for adjudication in April. She said they are in contact with the property owner and the city has a good relationship with the owner. Alderman Kot asked about debrisa dead tfee on Spring Street. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKfysti said they checked on that and the city was told it was bank owned. The city went to the county and found out the owner was still responsible for the property and they were issued a citation,which stated they had to remove the debristree by February 4, 2012. The city tried to work with him and nothing happened, so she stated the city issued a citation and they will be on the April 11th adjudication. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKfysfi stated on the Nicholson property the city went back and cited him for disrepair and requested for compliance by the 21 st of this month and there is a 30 day compliance period. The city will follow up with inspection on the 21 st and this is the third round of inspection citations. Alderman Gilson asked if this is fence related. Ms. Barksdale-Noblei stated it is fence and vehicle related. Ms. Barksdale-Noblelfys6 said in Raintree, we had complaints of illegal dumping around the retention pond. The city went out on the 27th of February and couldn't determine where the source was. On the 20th, the city sent letters to residents that dumping was illegal and hopefully, we will get a response. Ms. Barksdale-Noblei said she can get them a copy of the letter. She stated they have not had anymore complaints. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKTys4 said there were complaints on 400 Bridge Street about dumping. The city didn't find anything on that complaint. Ms. Barksdale-Noblei said on 301 W. Jackson Street there were complaints of goats in the front yard. She stated they were fenced,but two goats were there and violation notices were sent out to comply by February 24th. She stated the resident did comply, but the city received a call that a goat was back and city went back on March 6th and the goat was back. Alderman Gilson stated he received a call from Windett Ridge where someone was evicted and there were things in the front yard. A resident stated it was cleaned up. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKfysti stated to notify the city because when they are evicted it is the county which takes care of it in 10 days and the residents have to get their belongings. Alderman Gilson asked if the city is continuing to site the Windett Ridge property owners with continual violations on the weeds. Ms. Barksdale-Noblei stated as of May 1 st, if they are in violition, the city will cite. Alderman Gilson has an e-mail from a resident about moving a chain link fence on Game Farm Road. Alderman Gilson read the e-mail about residents cleaning up paper along the fence and the fence is broken. There were pictures attached showing damages. The residents stated they always maintain and clean up the trash. The resident stated there are now drinking parties going on there. Alderman Gilson stated the residents object to taking down the fence because the traffic from events the city holds cause people going through their properties. The residents would like the fence to remain. Mr. Dhuse stated this is the park department area. Mr. Dhuse said the fence is in bad shape. Alderman Teeling stated the homeowners can put up a fence on their own property. Alderman Gilson read a letter that was sent to Bart Olson about the driving range. The residents letter is about the problem of golf balls in the residents yards. The resident is asking for the city to use whatever resources they can to help with this issue. The resident stated they were told to let the city know about each incident. The resident listed the many incidents in the letter to the city. The resident is worried that someone is going to get hit by a golf ball. That e-mail was responded to by Bart Olson in which Mr. Olson told the resident it is up to the property owner. Alderman Gilson asked why did the city tell the resident to document these incidents. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKi stated she researched the wind patterns in the area and looked at the dates. If you look at that when these occur it is usually the third week of each month. She checked if there was a certain group that attended the golf range at that time. The city was told no. The wind patterns do not typically flow in the direction of those particular lots. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKi said there is no property maintenance issue the city can cite them on, unless there is an injury. Alderman Gilson said so someone has to get hurt for the city to do something. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKi said no, she talked Bart Olson to see if the city can have the owner put up a net and Mr. Olson said it is cost prohibitive and the city cannot force them to do that. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKfys4 said she looked into different case law with golf courses. Ms. Barksdale- NobleK,-ysti said the city has no authority when a housing authority comes in knowing there is a golf course. It then becomes an insurance issue. The city cannot step in because they are not violating any ordinance we have on the books. Alderman Gilson said this is a driving range not a golf course and the residents were told there was a buffer there and that is not the case. Alderman Gilson stated he doesn't understand how this issue is any different from any other time someone is in danger. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKi said she is not public safety she is property maintenance. Alderman Gilson said the residents don't understand why they were told to document these issues, if the city cannot help. Ms. Barksdale-No bleKi stated she doesn't know the answer to that, it was before she was involved. She stated maybe the police should be involved. Alderman Milschewski asked if the driving range was there when the houses were built. Mr. Dhuse said yes. Alderman Milschewski said the residents knew this was a possible issue then. She stated she doesn't want anyone hurt,but they bought knowing the range was there. Alderman Kot asked if there was a way to put trees or something else there. Alderman Milschewski asked how long ago the buffer was put in. Mr. Dhuse stated mid 90's. Alderman Milschewski stated since then, things must have changed. Alderman Gilson stated the residents'personal property and safety is in jeopardy because the property owner doesn't want to step in. Alderman Milschewski stated that makes it a public safety issue. Alderman Gilson stated he doesn't want to keep sending this to different committees. Alderman Kot said the residents need a straight answer. The legal department said the city cannot pursue this it is a civil matter. The residents can sue the range if they choose. Alderman Kot asked how many homes are affected. Alderman Gilson stated seven are complaining, but there are 14 or 15 that are affected. Alderman Gilson said all driving ranges I know of have a net. Alderman Gilson said someone is going to get hurt. Alderman Gilson asked Ms. Barksdale- Noblei to talk to the owner of the golf range and tell him the limited flight golf balls are not working and if there is anything else he would do as a respected business neighbor to these residents to help resolve this issue. Alderman Gilson asked about Tommy Hughes Road. Ms. Barksdale-NobleK+Ysti said they fixed the potholes. Alderman Milschewski asked about the trees being cut down in order to widen Route 47. She asked about how the trees are being cut down and left. Mr. Dhuse said there is not method to it, he thinks they will be back to finish certain trees. Alderman Milschewski said she doesn't understand why they don't take all of the tree at once and not leave them half done. Old Business: PW 2012-22 -Windett Ridge Bond Call Update-Alderman Gilson said he had this added although the city asked us to limit discussion.Alderman Gilson said he feels the city owes it to the residents to give them an explanation. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKfysti said in Bart Olson's memo it stated that when we first engaged for notice on demand on bond,because it was 2004 a lot of the companies had moved, and they were sent back. The city found them and resent them and the companies responded. Lexon wanted more information and Travelers requested a lot of information. Counsel is reviewing it now to make sure the information is correct. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKFy4i said Travelers denied the call for a couple reasons and the city is waiting on counsel for recommendations. Alderman Kot said before the city could even provide the information, Travelers denied this. Ms. Barksdale-No bleKFysti said yes. Alderman Gilson read the letter from Wiseman Hughes relaying their responsibility with a two year limitation. Wiseman Hughes said something also had to be done within 12 months of when it was discovered. Alderman Gilson said that bonds the city holds only devalue. Alderman Gilson said how many other development agreements out there does the city have like this that have the 12 month clause and two year limitation. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKfysti said she is not sure. Alderman Gilson said the city needs to look into this issue and it needs to be addressed, so the residents do not suffer. Alderman Kot asked if legal counsel is presently reviewing this issue. Ms. Barksdale-No bleKFysti said yes they are reviewing my response. Alderman Gilson said the city didn't have enough securities in this particular subdivision. Alderman Gilson stated now to make it worse, the city might not be able to collect on any bonds. Alderman Gilson said he has been saying these things need to be looked at for a long time. Alderman Gilson said the city needs to start calling bonds. Debra Kaiser stated she is very disappointed in this city. She stated they are faced with what should have been the city's responsibility for 107 residents. She said she feels the city would look at the bonds as a asset. She asked why has the city not followed up with what company is holding their money. Ms. Barksdale-No bleKi said in general the city does know the bonds the city has for subdivisions. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKi said there is a process, which requires litigation for at least a year,which is costly for the city that is why the city tried to work with developers. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKi said in 2010 the city was working with Windett Ridge some things were done by the bank and that was why the city hadn't called the bonds. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKi said once this process starts everyone digs their heels in, the bond companies not wanting to pay and developers not wanting to finish the development. She said that is a standard response. Kathy Neddo stated her guess is they are looking at all the dates. What Wiseman Hughes will give them will be much different. Ms. Neddo said she has letters from 2009 asking to pull the bonds. Ms. Neddo said there are pictures and a lot of documentation to the city letting them know. The city says the homeowners are responsible. Ms. Neddo said they should not have to fix the pond when the city was negligent by not following up with the builder. Ms. Neddo said the flooding problem was fixed and they blacktopped the main streets,but she stated during that time the pond issue was brought up. Ms. Neddo said now in 2012 the attorneys are looking at dates trying to figure out when the communication took place. Ms. Neddo said to look at the minutes starting in 2009 with complaints from residents. Ms. Neddo said the city never followed up to see if the items were done. Ms. Neddo said the homeowners are not going to be able to cover this more homes will foreclose. Ms.Neddo stated the city has ownership here. A resident said she appreciates Ms. Barksdale-NobleKi talking about the process. She asked Ms. Barksdale-NobleKfys6 why did we end up in this situation when each document states time lines to respond and why was no one managing that. Mr. Dhuse said he believes that is what the counsel is looking at the dates that Wiseman Hughes gives to the bond company is completely different. Mr. Dhuse said the city is not questioning the dates this is their standard response. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKfys+i said another issue is when Wiseman Hughes lost the property, the idea was the bank was moving forward doing things. Not that calling the bonds was off the table, the city was getting more response from the bank. Alderman Gilson said that is not true. Alderman Gilson said the only thing we fought for was Claremont Court and he stated we didn't make any progress with the bank. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKi said that in 2011 the city was informed Windett Hughes next generation has taken over. Alderman Gilson said the residents are trying to say whoever it is, why is the city just looking at this now when they are denying the bonds. Shouldn't the city have been aware of these time lines. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKi said there is a legitimate response from the city,but she can't put it on record. Alderman Kot said this will be discussed in executive session correct. Ms. Barksdale-NobleKfysti said yes. Rose Delo stated she and her husband are managing Windett Ridge property. She asked about when the bonds are issued, doesn't the city look over this documentation and why was this not noted to check the dates because then we lose claim to the bond. Ms. Delo stated someone let this fall through the crack. She stated the homeowners cannot cover all that needs done in this subdivision. Ms Delo said the liens are not even enforced for moving lawns. Bob Delo asked has the City of Yorkville successfully called bonds on other developers and what are they. He asked what is the process as far as steps. Ms. Barksdale-Noblei stated after the city demands bonds, the legal side takes over beyond that she said she can tell him the process usually takes about a year. Alderman Milschewski said the city is in historic times for this area. If the economy hadn't tanked, this would not have happened. She said she doesn't know if the city has called them before. Alderman Kot said he doesn't recall ever having to do that. Alderman Teeling said Whispering Meadows, which is pending. Ms. Delo asked if anyone was looking at the clauses in there. She said someone blew that. Alderman Kot said we don't know for sure and we are getting ahead of ourselves. Alderman Kot said the city needs to see what legal counsel finds out and go from there. Ms. Delo asked why did the city wait until now. Alderman Milschewski said we don't know all these things. Alderman Gilson asked about a spreadsheet of developments and agreements that are periodically checked. Ms. Barksdale-No bleKfysti said yes she said she has a list of all bonds now. Alderman Milschewski said she knows there are spreadsheets she turned over when she was clerk and the information was there for each subdivision. Alderman Gilson said it is unprecedented times and these times are going to continue and this issue needs addressed. Ms. Neddo said insurance companies don't want to pay anything. She said the legal department is going to say based on the contract the dates look fishy. Ms.Neddo said lets wait for the answer form the legal department. She just wants it clear there was a lot of communication between everyone. Ms. Neddo said you cannot leave the residents left in the middle. Ms.Neddo said the pond needs fixed, then homeowners can pick up the maintenance of it. Alderman Teeling said the issue with Claremont Court and roads were done and if we would have called the bonds then, they wouldn't have fixed that. Ms.Neddo said while those things were getting fixed they were trying to negotiate and work with the bank to take care of the pond,but the builder came back to buy lots again. Alderman Teeling said if we had called the bond then, the roads would not have been fixed. Alderman Gilson said that is not true. Ms. Neddo said the city was trying to work with the bank to get those two big issues taken care of Ms. Delo said the bigger issue is the system on this needs to be fixed. Alderman Milschewski said the city understands this. The city didn't anticipate this and now it is come to light and it is being addressed and the city will be proactive. Alderman Milschewski said when this area boomed no one thought this would happen. She said all the city can do is move on from here. Alderman Milschewski said she has sat on counsel for 1 I years and she doesn't think anyone dropped the ball,but our economy tanked and we have to learn from this and address it. A resident said a contract is a contract and they all have clauses in them with dates and specific termination information, so if this is the problem with bonds, the city should be looking at all the contracts. Alderman Kot said just so everyone is aware when this becomes a legal matter, our ability to communicate some of this to the residents will become very limited and we will tell you what we can. Ms. Neddo said we just have to communicate. Alderman Gilson said he wanted to bring it to the table tonight so the residents would know where the city was at. Ms.Neddo said she understands this will take time. The residents just want to know the city is working for them. Alderman Teeling said that is what the city is doing. Additional Business: Alderman Kot asked about the status of the road study. Mr. Sanderson said he is waiting on direction from Bart Olson to begin. Alderman Kot asked if someone will be in attendance from the city at the Route 47 meeting this week. Mr. Sanderson said he will be attending and report back. Alderman Milschewski asked about Corned getting a truck stuck and the Corned guys had a brawl and left it a mess. Mr. Dhuse stated that will be taken care of by Comed. There being no further business, the committee adjourned at 7:16 p.m. Minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Godwin Minute Taker 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� 6 Legal ❑ Minutes EST. 1&36 Finance El Engineer ❑ Tracking Number Gy City Administrator El r� 9 _© Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the Public Works Committee—April 17, 2012 Meeting and Date: Public Works— 5/15/12 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Committee Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Page 1 of 5 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday,April 17, 2012 City Hall Conference Room COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Alderman George Gilson Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Diane Teeling Alderman Larry Kot Other City Officials in Attendance: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP, Community Development Director Eric Dhuse, Public Works Director Bart Olson, City Administrator Brad Sanderson, EEI The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Alderman George Gilson. Citizens Comments: None Minutes for Correction/Approval: Alderman Gilson asked to have revisions done for the meetings of October 18, 2011, November 15, 2011, January 17, 2012 and Lisa Pickering is to make red line corrections supplied by Alderman Gilson and to bring back to May 15, 2012 meeting for approval. Alderman Gilson also asked for corrections to be made for March 12, 2012. Copy has been given to Lisa Pickering to be revised and brought to May 15, 2012 meeting. This will move forward to the consent agenda. New Business: (below item moved forward in agenda) 1. PW 2012-25 Engineering Contractfor Game Farm Road Construction Mr. Sanderson, EEI said that the city has acquired 8 out of the 33 parcels that are needed prior to construction. The 8 were necessary for the Rt 47 improvements. HR Green needs to update their plats as well as a new title. It has been greater than a year since the work was done and the requirements in the land acquisition code by IDOT requires the title searches to be within a year old, we need to get the updates so that we can move forward with the land acquisition. The first process is to approve HR Green contract for$9,500.00 to update all the documents. Once that is done we can supply that to Mr. Jay Heap (Land acquisition specialist), he will then come back to us with an updated proposal so that we can move forward with the formal land acquisition. Alderman Kot asked if there was a overall map with all the changes and the new construction on it and if the committee could look at it at the next meeting? Mr. Sanderson said that there is and that he will bring one to the May 15, 2012 meeting for everyone to look over. Alderman Gilson asked when did we require the 8 parcels? Mr. Sanderson said within the last year. Alderman Gilson then asked if we have spoken to the other 25 property owners. Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble responded that there were initial offers made and sent out. Some of the residents responded and some did not respond. We have to update the titles because some names have changed on the properties. Alderman Gilson asked if the offers would be the same? Mr. Sanderson said that's why we do the reappraisals, some properties might go up and some might go down. 2. PW 2012-26 Engineering Contract for Safe Routes to School Grant Mr. Sanderson, EEI received a letter from the state increasing the funding to $280,000 for sidewalk improvements There was a February 2013 deadline to be finished, Mr. Sanderson did not think this was going to be done so IDOT is going to give a little leeway as long as the project is completed before school begins in August 2013. Mr. Sanderson suggest to move into Phase I and Phase I 1 engineering as soon as possible and target for fall and summiting plans for early June. Alderman Gilson asked if we have anything in writing from IDOT saying that it will be ok to go through August,just in case we don't make our deadline. Mr. Sanderson replied that he received a email from IDOT and that he copied Mr. Olson on this as well. Alderman Milschewski is concerned that there will be no direct sidewalk in front of Circle Center, but yet they are putting in sidewalks where they don't need them as much as in front of the schools where there is more kids walking. Alderman Kot asked who has the final say in the sidewalks? Mr. Sanderson responded that IDOT and FHWA have the final say in the size of the sidewalk. Alderman Kot made a comment that it is up to engineering and staff to make a good argument. Mr. Sanderson also said that there is reasoning behind the width because of the driveways and if wheelchairs were to go down the path. He also mentioned that there will be some tree removal in order to put in the sidewalks. Alderman Kot mentioned that most of these sidewalks will be going in on the old side of town where they have not had sidewalks. Alderman Kot also suggested that they will need to have good communication with the residents. He suggested that they have a construction meeting for the residents, where they can come and look at the plans of where the sidewalks are going in and could talk to the engineers and ask questions if they have any. Mr. Sanderson agreed. Move to consent. 3. PW 2012-27 Weed Ordinance Procedures for Summer 2012 Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble said that May 1 st is the beginning of weed enforcement. For two consecutive weeks in May we will be publishing our yearly notice in the Kendall County Record regarding the beginning of weed enforcement Director Barksdale-Noble also said that they are in the process of interviewing for their seasonal Co-Enforcement Inspector and will hopefully have on staff in the beginning of May. Director Barksdale-Noble said that they are trying to limit the use of the public works so they will not be mowing the large vacant lots and the large subdivision lots just as they did last year. Will only be mowing on a in-fill basis and highly developed areas. The part-time inspector will assist with complaints and lots that are in violation of the weed nuisance ordinance. Alderman Teeling asked if any of the developments have decided to plant natural prairie grass? Mr. Olson said that Grand Reserve, over by Bristol Ridge Road has. Alderman Gilson asked if we are hiring the inspector to go out and proactively look for weed ordinance violation and not wait for complaints? Director Barksdale-Noble responded that they are going to do windshield inspections. The inspector will go out and patrol subdivisions from the car through the windshield and see which lots they need to come back to post. There is a memorandum attached that explains all the weed ordinance procedures for the 2012 season. Mr. Olson said that we have the inspector budged for 40 hour work week, his primary objective will be the weeds. Old Business: IDOT Update Alderman Kot asked about the meeting in Sugar Grove regarding Route 47. Mr. Sanderson said that he did attend and that he just received a summary of the meeting and basically IDOT took public comments on the proposal bid. The IDOT staff at the meeting ran through alternatives with the attendees. There is a copy of the summary attached. Alderman Kot asked if they are planning on 4 lanes to run from Kennedy Road to downtown Sugar Grove? Mr. Sanderson responded that it will be 4-6 lanes. He also said that there will be a formal public hearing, the meeting that he attended was a public informational meeting. The public hearing should be sometime in December 2012. Alderman Kot asked Mr. Dhuse to confirm brush pick up for the week of April 23-27 and asked what side of town will you do first? Mr. Dhuse said that they do it all at once. Will send small pile crew out one way and a truck and tractor crew out the other way and then they will switch. Alderman Gilson asked Director Barksdale-Noble if she had the opportunity to go to Perfection Park like we asked, to talk to the owner? Director Barksdale-Noble said that she did not have the chance to get there, but she spoke to the owner. The owner of Perfection Park installed a wind-sock. Also individuals will need to sign in when they get their bucket of balls and by doing this they can trace the balls back to that individual if a ball was to go into someone's yard. Alderman Gilson did tell Director Barksdale-Noble that she already told him this at the last meeting he would like to know if there is anything else that is going to be done? Director Barksdale-Noble said that the owner is doing everything he can do and this is the most recent conversation with him, but that she will confirm when she spoke to the owner and let Alderman Gilson know. Alderman Kot made a comment while looking over the March 12 minutes, that the legal department said that the city could not pursue this because it is a civil matter. By instructing Director Barksdale-Noble to contact Perfection Park are we in any violation? Mr. Olson responded that the city is mediating between two property owners, there is no issue, all is says is that we will not go and fine them for the golf balls. Alderman Kot asked if we do not come up with a solution where do we go from here? Mr. Olson responded, nowhere; we attempt to mediate between the two properties and if we can't solve it then it is up to the two property owners. Alderman Gilson did make a comment that the owner of Perfection Park needs to take some responsibility for the balls being hit into residential properties. Alderman Gilson asked Mr. Olson if he had a status update for Windett Ridge weed ordinance violation; he would like to report back to the residents with any updates. Mr. Olson did not know off hand,but will email Alderman Gilson the information. Additional Business: Alderman Gilson noted that in the budget we passed there was a purchase for a new mower. He asked with the addition of that new mower will we be able to do anything more to cut and fine lots in Windett Ridge? Mr. Olson said that this is just a turf mower for wide open spaces in a much quicker fashion; can't be used in Windett Ridge. The meeting adjourned at 6:50pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Kimberly Ryan, Minute Taker Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0 •t► Legal ❑ Minutes Finance ❑ EST. -�` _ 1s36 Engineer ❑ �:--- g Tracking Number uJ City Administrator ❑ Public Works ❑ �CEti�`; El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Reconsideration of Minutes of the Public Works Committee—October 18, 2011 Meeting and Date: public Works—5/15/12 Synopsis: Request to reconsider previously approved minutes for additional corrections. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 2/21/12 Action Taken: Minutes approved by committee. Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Committee Approval Submitted by: Alderman Gilson Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Red-lined corrections from Alderman Gilson UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING City Hall, Conference Room Tuesday, October 18, 2011 COMMITEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Alderman George Gilson Alderman Diane Teeling Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Larry Kot OTHER CITY OFFICIALS PRESENT: Bart Olson- City Administrator Eric Dhuse - Public Works Director Brad Sanderson - EEI Krysti Noble - City of Yorkville Mark Hardin-Building Code Official The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. Citizens Comments: There were no citizens comments. Minutes for Correction or Approval: Alderman Larry Kot had one correction and Alderman Gilson has one. Minutes were then approved. New Business: PW 2011-60 Rush Copley Phase 1: Mr. Sanderson stated there was a request from Rush Copley to accept phase one of their improvements. He stated that in July, we met with them and have been looking through files and all their punch list items have been addressed. Mr. Sanderson stated it is appropriate to be taken to acceptance with reduction of credit to the value stated in the memo. This item is going to consent. PW 2011-61 Lot Mowing Procedures -Alderman Gilson said he is the one that put this item on new business. He stated that he received some questions from the Windett Ridge HOA and wanted to know what the procedures are. Alderman Gilson said he would like to know what the general guidelines are when we are talking to constituents and HOA's. Mr. Olson stated the city stopped mowing after we did a few large properties. He stated we determined it was a huge strain on our equipment and time for a lot of the larger lots, our equipment was not sufficient to handle it. Mr. Olson stated the success rate of receiving the payment for mowing was not successful. Mr. Olson stated the city then decided to try something new and make it punitive, fine them and pay per day, so when they are out of compliance it will turn into a lien on the property until it is mowed. Mr. Olson stated the city does not have the manpower for taking care of the mowing. The city decided a few years ago to stop mowing and take a different approach. Mr. Dhuse stated the city can do one or two lots between homes or situations like that, our mower is only six foot wide. Mr. Dhuse stated they did one of those last week. Mr. Olson said he would be happy to do it, if we could find a contractor that was willing to take the risk and go after the property owners and not get paid from the city, so we are not paying mowers and throwing money away. Alderman Kot asked on the lots that you have mowed recently, what percentage have you been paid for. Mr. Dhuse stated it is about 25%. Mr. Dhuse stated there are a lot of liens out there. He stated most of the time it doesn't happen on vacant lots it is usually on the homes because when they go to sell, they have to pay it. Mr. Olson said their decision making was with the larger subdivisions there are areas we could mow, but we are making sure that our costs are not cheap enough that the developers just look at it and decide it is easier for the city to take care of and pay us when we are done. Alderman Teeling asked for the committee to explain to her what the residents of Windett Ridge were asking for because she thinks this prompted a lot of this problem because they didn't have any money. Mr. Olson said they didn't have money to begin with. Mr. Olson said their specific request was they came to us as an entity and said there is a receivable in the annexation agreement. Wiseman Hughes oversized the sewer and the city is going to pay for it by October 2013. They said there is not money to pay mowers, the city owes us this in two years, so pay now and the city can mow and use our mower and we will schedule them and we will pay the invoices when then come in. Mr. Olson said the city brought that to committee and the committee and residents said no thanks, the city is not even sure that money is owed. Mr. Olson said the city told them they need to prove they are good stewards of the property before the city entertains bartering. Mr. Olson said that was relayed to them prior to the meeting and Mr. Olson said that is a good policy because you can't come to the city and expect us to bend without showing an effort to be flexible as well. Mr. Olson said if they would have done that, they might have had a different response, not necessarily with a different result. Mr. Olson said he feels that it might have been debated more than it was. Alderman Gilson said the developerr°°��ts called Mr. Funkhouser and he called me and I relayed to him that I had spoken to the HOA already and know their direction.Alderman Gilson said we had the HOA and residents of Windett Ridge them ail come here and they gave us a clear direction and we followed that direction. Alderman Teeling stated the problem is that property is still not getting mowed and Windett Ridge still doesn't have the money to do this, we are doing all we can do.Alderman Gilson stated that we made that clear at the last meeting. Mr. Olson said that we asked for a $10.00 per day per fine. Mr. Olson stated that we made it punitive that it is not a good option to let it go. Mr. Olson said the adjudicator ruled $5.00 per day and we are coming back to the Administration Committee to set a minimum fine of $25.00 per day, which is reasonable. Mr. Olson stated we want to make it clear that when you take on property in Yorkville, you need to maintain it. Alderman Teeling stated they have not mowed. Mr. Olson stated that our intent will be to ask for a violation from the last adjudication hearing date in September. Mr. Olson stated he is not sure if that will hold up or when we write the new ticket. Alderman Gilson asked when will we lien the property. Mr. Olson stated the lien should be the next week. Mr. Olson said that you can include lien release costs in the lien. Ms. Noble stated that they are getting all the addresses, so it should be done by the end of this week. Alderman Gilson stated that we have a staff now that will be working on weed violations and asked if they have been working on it. Mr. Olson stated yes. Mr. Hardin stated that Mr. Olson gave him several subdivisions to work on. He stated that he has been working on those. Bristol Bay, Windett, Blackberry Woods, Grand Reserve. He stated that Bristol Bay mowed some. Mr. Hardin stated that Autumn Creek mowed some there also. Alderman Kot asked if it is the developer or individuals. Mr. Olson stated it is both. Ms. Noble stated that it is only two lots out of all of them. Alderman Gilson asked for the names of who owns those properties because the HOA has asked him for that information. Alderman Gilson asked if we put a time line on how long we expend trying to contact a property owner. Ms. Noble stated it is a phone call to see if we can get in contact and we are out there that day or the next. Alderman Gilson stated weed ordinance violations his the single biggest issue that he gets contacted about. Alderman Gilson asked how long does the city wait until we place a lien. Mr. Olson stated that after adjudication and judgment they are given a date which to pay by, we usually lien it right after that. Mr. Olson said you have to give someone an opportunity to pay before you lien. Usually 30 days after invoice, it can take 2 months after a call. Mr. Dhuse said that we had some habitual offenders, so instead of filing four liens, we just wait and now file one lien for the entire amount. Alderman Kot asked if there are situations where neighbors are just doing the mowing themselves. Mr. Dhuse said yes, usually the front. PW 2011-62 Public Works Committee Schedule 2012 -The Committee agreed the dates are fine. Old Business: Pavement Management Study-Mr. Olson asked if there was a graph showed in the last meeting to show that there is a nonlinear relationship of how much it costs to repair pavement when you do it. Mr. Olson stated that$100,000 is a lot of money,but before we spend$300,000 down the road, we should figure out what the best point of action is for specific roads and go there. Mr. Olson said that they have $100,000 in the city wide capital fund next year for road resurfacing. He stated that we could use that money for this study. He stated that he realized that we then can't resurface until 2014, but he feels that the study will show that some roads, if we catch them now, will save us in the long run. Alderman Teeling stated she feels that it is a good idea, but she feels that we should not spend money on the study and use the money for resurfacing. Alderman Gilson stated he is in agreement with Alderman Teeling. Alderman Gilson said that we have resurfacing that we need now. Alderman Gilson said until things get better, we should use the money for what needs immediate resurfacing and wait until times are better to do the study. Alderman Gilson said that he sees the value to it, but not at this time. Alderman Kot stated that road repair is a complex issue. Alderman Kot said that he has seen when they fixed Main Street years ago, as a temporary repair, it is still holding up fairly well. Alderman Kot said he sees the value in the study and would like to see us do it. Alderman Kot stated that $100,000 doesn't fix a lot of roads. Game Farm patching was $50,000. Alderman Kot asked with the $100,000 what will be the first street you will work on. Mr. Dhuse stated that is a very tough call. Alderman Milschewski stated that she supports the study because it will get us moving in the right direction. Alderman Kot stated the way the budget is looking in the near future, the city is not going to have much impact on repairing our streets. The little bit at a time doesn't get it done, and we don't have a maintenance plan in place and our streets are getting worse. Alderman Gilson stated from the staff level, he can see why you would want this study,but from a resident perspective I can see they want the roads fixed. Alderman Kot said that the roads will not be fixed with $100,000. Alderman Milschewski said if we have $200,000, we can get the study done and then the study can tell us the best way to use the $100,000. Mr. Olson stated that Montgomery just completed theirs with EEI. He stated that it gives a budget figure going forward, so that we know what needs fixed immediately and what can just be seal coated. Then look and see what needs maintained and see what we need to spend out of the budget each year. Mr. Olson stated that Montgomery's number is 2.2 million each year, which is why they are going for a referendum and saying that we are not letting roads deteriorate and see if people can do this. Mr. Olson said that we need to look at budget re-appropriation or a tax increase.Alderman Gilson said that we are locked up in committee and it is not going anywhere. Alderman Teeling said that Montgomery has done the study and now they are going for a referendum and she stated she is not going to do that. Alderman Kot stated we don't know what we are going to do, but at least we would have the problems identified. Mr. Olson stated that in the next few years, the city is going to have a big problem when all of the large subdivisions that have tens of miles of roads in each one will have to replaced. He stated that he would like to get something in place to know what we need to do in the future and the costs. Alderman Gilson stated that we have storm and sanitary sewers and other necessitiesthings to fix. Alderman Gilson suggested taking it to councileemmi4ee for discussion. Alderman Kot asked about where Mr. Olson could find an extra$100,000. Mr. Olson stated that the city has tentatively budgeted for next year, so if that is where the target is, and the city wants to do this, he stated that we can move things around for where our priorities are. Alderman Kot said that if the city would have had something like this in place 10 to 15 years ago, the city wouldn't be in this bad situation like we are today. Alderman Kot said that to spend it on the study now will save us money in the future. Mr. Olson agreed. Alderman Gilson stated that we should bring this to city council for discussion on 10/25/11 not on consent agenda. Mr. Olson stated that a presentation would be appropriate. Flooding issues in Sunflower Estates Update: Mr. Sanderson stated a memo was put together for an alternative of funding for this improvement. There is a SSA that is in place for maintenance and repair of facilities related to storm water within that development. Mr. Sanderson said we outlined some alternatives and there is a maximum levy. He stated we looked at a five year or ten year payback and what the taxes would be. Mr. Sanderson stated out of a 117 parcels on site we recommend that we spread it to all the parcels. Mr. Dhuse stated he put together a cost estimate. He stated it is lower, but there are some big considerations to look at. Mr. Dhuse stated it is an estimate because there is a lot of unknowns. He stated it is a good base number, but it will probably turn upward. Alderman Gilson said his contention with this line of thinking, is the 10 year standards were the only standards in placein there and the engineering standards in place at the time didn't have issues to prevent flooding every couple years, which is what the residents are dealing with. Being that the city standards didn't have the 100 year standards in 1p acethere they were 10 years, I think they were lacking. The fact is that it has caused flooding amongst 7 out of 117 property owners seven out o . If we had the 100 year standards, we wouldn't have the flooding issues. I don't think the residents are going to appreciate staff s line of thinking. Alderman Gilson doesn't feel this is 44-s-the right way to go about resolving thisit. The city shouldn't add an SSA tax to the residents. Alderman Kot stated it is a steep increase and they are not happy with the SSA now. Alderman Gilson stated the residents are expecting the city to step up and handle this. Alderman Milschewski stated here is another thing we don't have the money for. She said she feels sorry for them and this problem, but we have to fund it. Mr. Olson stated in other areas had this issue created SSA's. Mr. Olson stated that since they already have an SSA, we looked at handling it this way and it will immediately take care of the problem. Mr. Olson stated that technically, yes that should have been in place and you should have already paid for it,but didn't, so it would go to those residents. Alderman Gilson stated he doesn't agree because he stated that we don't know what those costs would have been, it is subjective. Alderman Milschewski stated if it effected more than seven people, it might be different. Alderman all agreed that this waits until we have funding. Windett Ridge Mowing Update-Ms. Noble stated that she has been in contact with the development and she let them know that the city is going out this week. She stated that the development said they don't have the funds to do it, so the city is going to site them this week. Update on Road Maintenance on Tommy Hughes Way-Ms. Noble stated that she did contact the bank to see if we can get any information on this supposed agreement. She stated that she didn't get a response from them. Ms. Noble said it is First Midwest Bank. Alderman Gilson asked if anyone has contacted Shell to see what their agreement is in this. Alderman Gilson asked if we are going to continue to try to contact them. Ms.Noble stated that she will try. Alderman Gilson stated that road is in really bad shape, and someone needs to address it. If the agreement is no one is going to do it, then we need to let people know that. Ms.Noble stated that Circle K/Shell are going to put barriers up because they don't want to incur more costs after Circle K/Shell repaired the pot holes. Ms. Noble stated that she has not heard anything else since Circle K/Shell stated they are putting barriers up. Alderman Gilson asked when Circle K/Shell are going to have the barriers up. Ms. Noble said that she doesn't know how soon that will occur. She stated that she will check into it. Alderman Kot asked about the partially finished building back off that road. Mr. Dhuse stated that the developer fell ill. Ms. Noble stated that he contacted us last year to extend his building permit. The city asked him to secure the building and then it went through foreclosure. Kendall Marketplace Development Improvements -Mr. Sanderson stated that the contractor has been on site. He stated they placed stone on site and they are getting driveways ready for pavement. Alderman Gilson stated he is happy that this is being done, so the city might get some more commercial development there. Additional Business: Alderman Milschewski asked about Nicholson property and the fence and the vehicles sitting there. Ms. Noble stated strategically, the city went for what we could get a good judgment against, which is the fence. Ms. Noble said the city would have to basically do a stake out to show that for 30 consecutive days the vehicle has been there and has not had permits or tags then come to adjudication. Alderman Milschewski stated the semi has not moved in years. Ms.Noble stated that it is registered. Ms. Noble stated that the city is going for things that we have manpower to do and that we can get some compliance for. Alderman Milschewski asked about the fence. Ms. Noble stated he has to fix the fence along Mill and Van Emmon. Ms. Noble said the city will be out there for the weeds again. Alderman Gilson asked about oil. Ms.Noble stated that is hard to prove. Mr. Olson said the only leak found was an oil can covered in a box. Mr. Olson said the EPA didn't see anything. Alderman Gilson asked about the building having water service. Mr. Olson stated it doesn't and the last time we went to court with this the judge told us to work that out ourselves. Alderman Kot stated that there is a public safety concern. Alderman all agreed that the property needs cleaned up. Alderman Kot asked about the widening of 47 on the north end of town.Alderman Kot said if there is still a traffic issue in the morning going up 47 with Jericho backing up. Mr. Dhuse said that it is in phase one,which is the documentation then phase two is the design phase then phase three is construction. Mr. Dhuse stated he thinks that it will be the last piece of the puzzle. Mr. Olson stated he thinks it would be next. Mr. Dhuse said as far as traffic signals we have been in contact with IDOT and tried to work with them. He said once you leave Galena Road, it is a completely different sequence in timing and I am sure that it is not high on their priority list. Alderman Kot said he is concerned for those that drive that every day. He stated that the Jericho light is the cause of the problem. He asked if they could be contacted again. Mr. Dhuse stated he is correct it is the timing. There being no further business, the committee adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Godwin Minute Taker Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0 •t► Legal ❑ Minutes Finance ❑ EST. -�` _ 1s36 Engineer ❑ �:--- g Tracking Number uJ City Administrator ❑ Public Works ❑ �CEti�`; El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Reconsideration of Minutes of the Public Works Committee—November 15, 2011 Meeting and Date: public Works—5/15/12 Synopsis: Request to reconsider previously approved minutes for additional corrections. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 2/21/12 Action Taken: Minutes approved by committee. Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Committee Approval Submitted by: Alderman Gilson Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Red-lined corrections from Alderman Gilson UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING City Hall, Conference Room Tuesday, November 15, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Alderman George Gilson Alderman Diane Teeling Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Larry Kot OTHER CITY OFFICIALS PRESENT: Alderman Rose Spears Bart Olson- City Administrator Eric Dhuse - Public Works Director Brad Sanderson - EEI Krysti Noble - Community Development Director MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Tony Scott, Kendall County Record Rolph Snowbeck, Resident of Grande Reserve Becky Snowbeck, Resident of Grande Reserve Alderman Gilson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Citizens Comments: None. Minutes for Correction/Approval: PW 2011-65 Kennedy Road Shared Use Path -ITEP Grant Award -Mr. Olson stated this is a grant the city was awarded last year for Kennedy Road east of 47 to Grande Reserve and a final link to the Chicago Trail System. Mr. Olson said the total cost of trail is $350,000 because it is a federal grant and requires a fair amount of paperwork and engineering, which is a additional financial obligation to consider and it is four to five years out. Mr. Olson stated a minimum of three years before construction and the cost to the city would be $45,000 over three years. Alderman Teeling asked what happens if the city does not do it. Mr. Olson stated that there is not a penalty and the city can apply again. Alderman Teeling said she talked to a lot of residents and they all are in favor of this. She stated that they love the trails in their subdivision and they want this link. Alderman Kot asked about the net cost to the city and Mr. Olson said for the next three years it would be $45,000. Mr. Olson stated after that the construction is around$350,000. Alderman Kot asked when the city applies for the state grant. Mr. Olson stated the city would apply for that after the city decides to do this. Mr. Olson stated that would get it below$200,000. Mr. Olson stated the issue on the table tonight is an engineering contract with EEI to do phase one and two and it is over$20,000 so it has to be signed off by city council. Mr. Olson said that additionally IDOT requires to do a trail/grant agreement committing to do a trail. Mr. Sanderson stated it is a joint agreement that specifies the funding for phase one and two engineering. Mr. Sanderson stated it must be completed within 10 years. Mr. Sanderson said once the city commits to start, it must follow through or could be subject to reimburse the state. The city has 10 years to get the project started with construction. Alderman Gilson asked about the $45,000 for the first three fiscal years and if it has been budgeted. Mr. Olson stated that it has not. Mr. Olson stated that it would be funded by the general fund. Alderman Gilson asked when the funds would become due. Mr. Olson said that would be billed out as the project moves along and when the project is completed, we would submit for reimbursement from IDOT. Alderman Gilson asked if the city would see a bill in 2012. Mr. Sanderson stated that it usually takes four to six months to be approved, so that would put it to the tail end of the fiscal year before the city could start. Mr. Olson said the first bill from EEI would be toward the middle to end of 2012. Mr. Sanderson said they would invoice through the project. He stated that phase one would take six to eight months to get together. He said that it would be at least 18 months before it would begin Phase II design. Alderman Gilson stated it is a commitment to pay$350,000 to finish the whole project. He said if we haven't budgeted for the first $45,000, I have a hard time telling my constituents that we can't fix their roads, but we are going to spend this amount on trails. Alderman Kot asked if we don't go ahead with the trail now, he said he sees there are land acquisitions, so what will happen. Mr. Sanderson stated there are some easements that need to be acquired and some right away. Alderman Kot asked if the city tries to acquire it today, or 10 years from now, is there an issue either way. Alderman Kot asked if there is something time sensitive about acquiring this property. Mr. Sanderson said the land would get more expensive and construction prices would go up. Mr. Olson stated it is adjacent to the Grande Reserve subdivision, so when those units get platted we can just ask for an easement, so it shouldn't change price over time. Mr. Olson stated there are a couple of small out parcels not in city limits we have to acquire from a private party right away,which is a variable in this situation. Alderman Milschewski asked if it goes on both sides of the road. Mr. Olson stated that it is just the south/east side. Alderman Kot stated that he agrees with Alderman Gilson. Alderman Kot said that he has a hard time telling the residents there is little money for roads, but we are going to put in a trail. Alderman Kot said we could revisit this in a few years, he stated it is not a priority. Mr. Olson said that we have to reapply. Alderman Teeling said that the residents are very much in favor of having this and they want it. Alderman Kot said that if he asks the residents if they want their roads fixed or create a trail that they are not going to use now, they will want the roads. Alderman Kot said that it is not the time, we don't have the money. Alderman Milschewski said she agrees with Alderman Kot, the concept is great, but we have other things that need to be done for the whole of Yorkville not just that area. Alderman Teeling asked what the citys chances are when they apply again. Mr. Olson said he would think it would be the same result, but sometimes grant committees don't like to see a grant they previously awarded and then they denied it. Alderman Teeling said basically, this trail, if we decide to do on our own will cost 1.3 million and it won't happen if we don't get this grant again. Alderman Gilson stated that is pure speculation. Alderman Gilson said what we know is the city has roads and sewers that need fixed and don't have the money and the city needs to take care of what needs to be taken care of and make priorities. Alderman Milschewski asked about the plans for Kennedy Road. Mr. Olson said there are two obligations with Autumn Creek and Grande Reserve that are supposed to fund large portions of the project at a certain point. Mr. Olson said he thinks that the trigger points are 500 units in Grande Reserve and Autumn Creek there is a time line. Alderman Milschewski asked if Grande Reserve can do the trail. Mr. Olson stated no that will not be possible. Alderman Gilson asked the Mr. and Mrs. Snowbeck how they felt about the trails. Mrs. Snowbeck stated that she didn't care. PW 2011-68 Grande Reserve Request for Letter of Credit Reduction -Mr. Olson stated someone from A9vanti/Bank of America one of the buyers/seller of subdivision was supposed to be here to state their request. Mr. Olson stated they let the city know yesterday they would not be in attendance. He said there is not an agreement they are reviewing our counter offer to their offer. Mr. Olson said where we started every request they had would require city council authorization. They studied the infrastructure of the subdivision and told the city what they had remaining. The city reviewed it and disagreed with certain things. Mr. Olson said we are getting close to an agreement. He said only one thing they want requires an annexation agreement. Mr. Olson said what they are asking for can be done at staff level and city council level. Mr. Olson stated that they have completed work. Mr. Olson stated they are going to pave some roads and complete some sidewalks and they would like a reduction of credit for that. Mr. Olson stated they are asking some of the obligations to be transferred to the future purchaser. Mr. Olson said they are asking to draw an area in different areas and release letters of credits for those areas because we are not planning to build on it, which requires an annexation agreement amendment. Mr. Olson said they do intend to complete entire units of infrastructure in the subdivision and take it to final acceptance to the city, instead of posting a warranty bond, to give us cash and assume the risk under the warranty period, which we have done in the past. Mr. Olson stated they should be here Tuesday to discuss it in public hearing. Alderman Gilson said he is concerned about taking the cash payment in lieu of security and if they don't complete, would we be at risk. Mr. Olson said we would study that and see what they actually do. We will have the engineers look at it and see what the risk is for the city, or is it complex and something we don't want a part of. PW 2011-63 Northland and Western - Traffic Control Signage- Mr. Sanderson said a request came in to look at that intersection. There is no signage or control at that intersection. Mr. Sanderson stated the intersection is open with the exception of one tree. He stated traffic is below the 2,000 units per day. Mr. Sanderson stated there is not an accident history at that intersection. He said that this intersection is not a good candidate for a yield sign based on the MUTCD regulations. The side street yields to the major street and it should operate well that way. Alderman Gilson asked who the request was submitted by Mr. Sanderson stated it was an alderman that submitted it. Mr. Olson stated some of the residents were concerned it was next to a park and some are uncomfortable with an unsigned intersection. Mr. Dhuse stated if the tree is a problem, it will be removed. This item will be moved to consent. PW 2011-64 Miscellaneous Bituminous Patching -Mr. Sanderson stated this payment request is for the patching on Game Farm Road. The work is 100% complete, so we are recommending payment in the amount of$47,092.90. This will be the one and only pay request and it is below the authorized amount set earlier this year. This will move to consent. PW 2011-66 Autumn Creek Bond Reduction -Mr. Sanderson stated Pulte discovered earlier this year they were double bonded, meaning they had SSA bonds to cover part of the infrastructure and conventional bonds as well. Apparently, this was a problem in Bristol Bay, as well. They do not need to provide both. Several years ago they corrected this issue in Bristol Bay and discovered that this was an issue in Autumn Creek. Basically, our recommendation is for reductions. Mr. Sanderson stated they did a check to confirm the amount of conventional bonding and the SSA bonds to make sure there is enough bondage in place for the completed work and it is in place to cover ourselves. Mr. Sanderson stated they are recommending reducing bonding. Alderman Kot asked how this can go undetected for so long. Mr. Sanderson stated that it is an oversight back when building was moving quickly, it happened. Alderman Gilson asked why conventional bonding is still required and why would there be conventional bonding still required, if we had them double bonded. Mr. Sanderson stated they had a lot of money for earth work through the SSA for example, and they have already spent the $400,000 and we still need to have some more work out there, so we still need money to cover that so we need conventional bonding for that. Alderman Gilson asked if it was double bonded and we had money on the SSA side, why do we need conventional bonding. Mr. Sanderson stated double bonding means they had within the SSA bonds there are 10 line items where they could expend money. On the earth work side, they have expended all their money toward that and we still need to have security in place for that. Alderman Gilson asked about the appreciation that it will cost to complete, we will never have enough money over time, that bond will fall short, it is simple math. Alderman Gilson asked if we reduce these bonds, are we reducing these bonds according to the estimates from what year. Mr. Sanderson said from 2005. Mr. Sanderson stated it takes into account inflation, which is taken into consideration. Alderman Gilson stated that is good,but it will still not cover it. Alderman Gilson worries about reducing and not having enough bonds over time. Mr. Olson stated that is understandable, but this is the only subdivision that has built anything recently and it is in our own policy that we will do this, so if the city does not do this, it will be a red flag for future developers that we are not following our policies. Ms. Noble stated that this is in our annexation agreement that the developer has the discretion to choose one or the other. Alderman Gilson stated simplified legally, we are bound to not have them double bonded, if they request to do so. Mr. Olson stated that is correct. Mr. Dhuse stated in this case we should be well covered. Mr. Dhuse said he thinks the total minimum is 2.88 and if I am adding right it is a little over 5.1 million that we are still holding in bonds. Mr. Sanderson stated that is correct and Pulte is out there going through the development taking care of the punch list and they would like the city to come out in the fall and get a punch list they can work on in the winter and then in the spring get a good chunk of the development to the acceptance stage. This item will be moved to consent. PW 2011-67 Kendall Marketplace Improvements -Mr. Sanderson stated this is a pay request for work that has been completed in Kendall Marketplace. This will not be the final payment. It is for the amount of$61,057.18 for work that has been performed to date by Wilkinson. At this point, we will come in at or even slightly below the original value. Mr. Sanderson said generally, the work for the most part has been completed. The painting, curb and additions in grading. The grading was completed at the park site. The seeding was held off, due to the discussion with the parks. That work will be finished in the spring. Alderman Gilson asked what the other payments are for. Mr. Sanderson said that we had to cut off the date at a certain time for work performed. There was work done between the cut off date and now that is what is coming. When the spring work is complete, there will be a final invoice in the spring. Alderman Gilson asked if we looked at the stabilization of that area, will it hold up until that area is developed. Mr. Sanderson said we still need a punch list, but it did what it was meant to do. It cleaned up things and shaped it up. The additional pavement will prolong the life of it and it is a positive affect. Mr. Dhuse said they did extra fine grading that will help. Alderman Gilson asked if this will last awhile and in a year we won't have issues. Mr. Sanderson said that can depend on mother nature, but he feels that things are pretty solid out there. This item will be moved to consent. Old Business: PW 2011-52 Windett Ridge Mowing Update-Ms. Noble said that this is an update from the mowing complaints from the adjudication hearing in September. There were 14 units that lead to a$57,200 fine to Windett Ridge, LLC. Ms. Noble stated that on October 20th they were cited again this time 144 lots total. The hearing is scheduled for November 21 st and she said we will again go after this development at a higher minimum lot fee. Mr. Olson stated there is a minimum fine in place now. Alderman Gilson said we have notified, adjudicated and fined, can we lien the first $57,200. Mr. Olson said you can't lien until we take the case itself to administrative review. Alderman Gilson asked why we can't with the first $57,200. Mr. Olson said they would prefer to do it all at once because of costs. Ms. Noble said that the city can't file the lien because the city did not perform the actual work. You can only lien against work that we completed. Alderman Gilson said that was not what was stated before when the citizens were sitting here. Mr. Olson said we are still intending on putting a lien, but we have to go through a hearing process to lien because the city didn't actually perform the work. Alderman Gilson said for security sake,we don't know what is going to happen with the new entity to place a lien on, so why can't we lien now before they file a transfer of ownership or bankruptcy. He feels that would be a smart thing. Mr. Olson stated that the hearing is this coming Monday. Alderman Gilson asked if the city will do that on Monday. Mr. Olson stated that it depends on what happens at the hearing. Alderman Gilson stated that we could be waiting another month and a half before something is done whereas if we file a lien, we could do something right now. Mr. Olson said no, we will have to go through an administrative system. Mr. Olson stated that he prefers to do two at once that is Attorney Orr's recommendation. Alderman Spears stated that will be less attorneys fees. PW 2011-48 -Road Maintenance on Tommy Hughes Way and Saravanos Dr. Update-Ms. Noble said this is a verbal update. She stated that she contacted the marketing manager for Circle K, Terry Johnson. He stated that there is not an agreement that he is aware of that Circle K has with Saravanos to maintain the area. Ms. Noble said the First Midwest Bank has the title to the property now. Alderman Gilson said we were told that Circle K was going to maintain the road because of the agreement between the owners/trust. Mr. Dhuse said at that time it was Shell not Circle K. Ms. Noble said now the bank that owns it. Ms. Noble said that they addressed the pot holes. Alderman Gilson said the public is using that as a road and it is private property, so how is this ever going to get maintained. Mr. Dhuse said it doesn't have to because it is private property like your driveway. Alderman Kot said they could close that off. Ms. Noble stated they are going to do that to parts of it. Mr. Olson stated that the simple answer is this is a property maintenance issue and if it is not kept up, they will be cited. Additional Business: Alderman Kot asked about the leaf pickup. Mr. Dhuse said that the south side was completed Monday morning and they are on the north side at Spring Street. Mr. Dhuse stated if we go any further into the year,we get snow and we can't do it after it snows. It is a planned time for pick up. We don't come around twice, they have to pick them up using bags. Alderman Milschewski asked if we have someone that we contact at the Patch. She said they have the meeting time listed wrong. Alderman Milschewski asked about Mr. Nicholson's property. Ms. Noble said that he has been cited again and he is scheduled for adjudication for December 21 st. There being no additional business the meeting was adjourned at 7:14 p.m. Minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Godwin Minute Taker Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0 •t► Legal ❑ Minutes Finance ❑ EST. -�` _ 1s36 Engineer ❑ �:--- g Tracking Number uJ City Administrator ❑ Public Works ❑ �CEti�`; El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Reconsideration of Minutes of the Public Works Committee—January 17, 2012 Meeting and Date: public Works—5/15/12 Synopsis: Request to reconsider previously approved minutes for additional corrections. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 2/21/12 Action Taken: Minutes approved by committee. Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Committee Approval Submitted by: Alderman Gilson Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Red-lined corrections from Alderman Gilson UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING City Hall, Conference Room Tuesday,January 17, 2012 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Alderman George Gilson Alderman Larry Kot Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Diane Teeling OTHER CITY OFFICALS PRESENT: Alderman Carlo Colosimo Mayor Gary Golinski City Administrator, Bart Olson Public Works Director, Eric Dhuse EEI, Brad Sanderson Interim Parks Director, Laura Schraw OTHERS PRESENT: Tony Scott, Kendall County Record Judith Gregg, Windett Ridge Deb Kaiser,Windett Ridge Kathleen Neddo,Windett Ridge Billy McCue, McCue Builders Rose M. Debo, Windett Ridge Charlie Walker,Yorkville Chair Gilson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Citizens Comments: There were many residents in attendance from Windett Ridge and residents to discuss the Kennedy Road bike trail. Their comments are included in the agenda items. Minutes for Correction or Approval: Minutes from October 18, 2011 and minutes from November 15, 2011 need to be amended and will come back to committee next month for approval. New Business: PW 2012 -02 Subdivision Infrastructure Discussion- Chair Gilson stated that he and Alderman Colosimo attended the Windett Ridge HOA meeting. Chair Gilson stated there were many questions about mowing, bonding,punch lists, and liens. The residents said they want the lien filed ASAP on the mowing issue. The other issue is calling the bonds because Windett Ridge, LLC says they do not have enough money to keep up with the mowing. Chair Gilson stated it is in the residents best interest to go forward on collecting on those bonds. Deb Kyser, a resident of Windett Ridge, stated that she requests the bonds need to be called. Ms. Kyser said she understands the builder is no longer there, but feels that the city has a responsibility to the residents in that subdivision. Ms. Kyser said the subdivision has deteriorated and she understands there is not enough money for everything,but the pond and walking paths etc. could be fixed. Kathy Neddo, Windett Ridge, stated the biggest problem in the subdivision is the pond and most of the homes are in that area. Kathy said before the builder left, they were told to fix certain things, so someone dropped the ball. Kathy said for homeowners, it is bad enough the builder left and all of the finger pointing, but the critical things need addressed and it is getting worse. Kathy said the pipes are more exposed and the pond needs addressed with the bond money. Judith Guzy,Windett Ridge, spoke about the natural basin that is caving in and said when they were still building, that basin was named the sickest natural basin in Kendall County. Chair Gilson said he explained in the HOA meeting the city policy and what they had to do to become in compliance with the pond. Chair Gilson said someone needs to be responsible for the pond. Chair Gilson asked the committee to call the bonds before it diminishes further. Alderman Milschewski stated that in 2009 we called bonds in Whispering Meadows and we still have not received anything. Alderman Milschewski asked why do we have these bonds, if we don't get anything. Mr. Olson stated the letter of credit bonding companies have figured out it is cheaper to fight the city, rather than comply. Charlie Walker,Windett Ridge, stated that he attended a Public Works Meeting years ago where the chairman assured him the city was going to call the bonds. Mr. Walker stated that these issues are not new and the city did not secure enough bonds for what the project called for. Mr. Walker said in the past when he spoke with the city, he was told that the bonds, if they were called, could not be used for what we are talking about tonight, and the ponds were not a part of that. Mr. Walker stated that these things should have been addressed five years ago. Mr. Walker asked if the items on the punch list are not completed, who is going to pay for it. Mr. Walker said the city will slap the residents with the bill. Mr. Walker said the city failed the residents and bad deals were made and it will fall on the residents. Mr. Walker said don't repeat these mistakes. Chair Gilson stated that he agrees with Mr. Walker and the city needs to step forward and do something about it. Chair Gilson said the city needs to move forward with calling these bonds. Alderman Colosimo said the fact that there can be problems calling bonds, should not be a reason to not call them. Alderman Colosimo said the city cannot be afraid of litigation. Kathy,Windett Ridge, said the homeowners will not be able to take on a special assessment. Kathy said take the bonds and then the homeowners will make sure that it is maintained. Chair Gilson asked the committee to move this forward to consent to call these bonds complete. PW 2011-52 Windett Ridge Mowing Update-Mr. Olson said that the documents are supposed to be drafted to take to court in the next two weeks. Mr. Olson said after that, there is a 30 day notice and 60 to 90 days to get a court date. Then when the courts decide to hear it is when we finish the lien. Chair Gilson said the city keeps stating they are going to do things in the next two weeks. Chair Gilson said that we have to be accurate and get these liens filed and put at the top of the list. Mr. Walker said that he doesn't understand why there are two standards one for business and one for the average tax payer. Mr. Walker said if that was his property, the city would be on him to get it taken care o£ Mr. Walker said there is a difference on how the residents are treated and how the city treats developers and the residents are paying the bills. Alderman Colosimo said there needs to be liens on the lots. Chair Gilson said the liens need to be done before they become insolvent. Mr. Walker said the liens run with the land. Alderman Colosimo said that is exactly the point, when someone wants the land, someone will have to pay. PW 2012-05 Ash Tree Removal in Certain Subdivisions -Mr. Dhuse stated he asked to remove Ash trees in several subdivisions this fall. Mr. Dhuse stated most show signs of emerald ash borer. Mr. Dhuse stated to be proactive, the city would remove all the trees at once. Chair Gilson stated that he has heard two views from residents on this topic. One is to remove the trees that show infestation, and the second to remove all of the trees. Chair Gilson is concerned the residents need to have communication about this before removal begins, so the city doesn't get complaints. Chair Gilson asked about checking on what other communities are doing about this problem. Mr. Dhuse stated that yes, several states and communities are removing millions of trees to prevent this problem. Alderman Colosimo pointed out these are trees that are in public areas and not private properties. Chair Gilson stated he thinks there should be a mass communication to let the residents know what will be happening and let the residents know that the cost to replace the tree is on them. The suggestion from committee is to put a notice on the residents homes as they pull the trees. Mr. Dhuse stated that if residents are treating the trees, they will leave them. PW 2012-13 Stop Sign Studies for Intersections in Windett Ridge- Mr. Sanderson stated that the city looked at the two intersections requested and both are similar in nature. The intersection of Fairfax Way and Windett Ridge was looked at. Mr. Sanderson said the city follows MUTSD guidelines. He said traffic volume is less than 2,000 vehicles per day, and there is no accident history or sight restrictions at these intersections. Therefore, they are not good candidates for a stop sign. The Sutton Street and Windett Ridge intersection have the same findings. Mr. Sanderson stated stop signs are not used for controlling speed. Alderman Kot asked about the traffic calming devices. Mr. Sanderson said these devices have become more common in the last few years and involve narrowing of streets, adding speed bumps,plantings that can be put in, a variety of different tools can be used to slow traffic down. A resident asked what time of day the intersections were studied. Mr. Sanderson stated there is not a specific time the criteria is standard from experience. The resident stated on Fairfax there is a lot of traffic because this road goes to the Middle School. The resident asked if we can get police to watch before and after school. The resident stated that when snow is plowed the corners are it is difficult to see. Mr. Sanderson stated this is a common problem in many areas in the community. Mr. Olson stated that as a result of this request, the police chief said he will direct some additional forces out there. Chair Gilson asked how a stop sign doesn't control speed. Mr. Sanderson said that it can actually be more dangerous. The committee discussed there are many studies that state the stop signs can be more dangerous. A resident asked about the MUTCD standards and is that what the city follows. The committee agreed that is correct. Alderman Teeling stated that in Bristol Bay there were issues with speeding and the police did step up their patrols. Chair Gilson stated he feels that if the residents want a stop sign they should get it, but that is not how it works. Alderman Milschewski stated that can cause problems with liability if we don't follow their standards. PW 2011-65 Kennedy Road Shared Use Path -ITEP Bike Path Grant-Bill McCue stated in the last month he has talked to a lot of people in Yorkville who have businesses in town and all of them have agreed to raise and donate money to help pay for the path. Mr. McCue said that the YYTF and wrestling, neighbors, friends all have said they would be willing to donate and fund raise. Mr. McCue said that people want the path, but they don't want their taxes going up. Mr. McCue said he holds a fund raiser golf outing each year for his brother that passed away and they have raised over$40,000 each time. Mr. McCue said that he would like to raise the $220,000 for this path so it does not cost the taxpayers. Mr. McCue said that he knows we can get enough support from businesses and residents to make this happen. Mr. McCue said this path will connect several neighborhoods and it will benefit our community. Alderman Kot asked about his number of$220,000 because he said the number is $357,000. Alderman Teeling said there is another grant. Alderman Kot said those are state grants and there is not a guarantee that the city will get those grants. Chair Gilson said the city doesn't have the money, so the city cannot guarantee this project and commit to the path. Chair Gilson stated that if there is a check or payment up front before the city has to commit to it, then he is for it. Alderman Milschewski asked when they are going to begin fund raising. Mr. McCue stated they are still in the process of planning. Alderman Milschewski stated that the city has to commit by the end of this month. Mrs. McCue said they are talking to Nicor to see if they will donate. Mr. McCue said it comes down to raising $25,000 per year along with the golf outing. Mr. McCue said they have a lot of ideas for fund-raising and there is six years to pay for it. Alderman Kot said the big payment is due 2016, which is $157,000. Alderman Kot said his concern is the city says yes and then the economy gets worse and then this goes before a future city council and they are stuck paying that bill. Alderman Kot said that is a lot of money and we can't commit to that. Alderman Teeling stated that the city committed to the Route 71 bike trail. Alderman Teeling said this is the second time the residents stated they want to pay for this trail. The committee said they are not arguing the fact that the residents want this,but the council cannot commit to a project without having the funds. Chair Gilson said the issue is not if we want a path, it is having to secure the funds the city doesn't have. Alderman Colosimo said the argument is not about if people want trails. He stated the taxpayers cannot be the guarantee if you fall short of the goal. If there is a company willing to fund the path up front, he is all for it. The committee agreed that if it is funded up front, they will have the trail. Alderman Teeling stated that we can't take funds from people until this is approved. Alderman Colosimo stated that you can get a commitment for the funds ahead of time, then we pass it and the company funds it. Alderman Kot asked if the date can be extended. Mr. Olson said yes they are flexible, but Mr. Olson stated he is not sure how much extra time will be granted. Alderman Colosimo stated to be clear, he wants a check for$357,000 up front, and then he will vote for it then fundraiser money pays it back. Mr. McCue stated that a personal guarantee means we will get the money. The committee agreed it has to be an up front commitment with legally guaranteed money. Alderman Colosimo stated that for every resident that is for a bike trail, there are just as many residents that do not want them. Chair Gilson said this will come back to the next Public Works Committee Meeting.Alderman Teeling thinks it should go to city council. Mr. Olson said he will place it on the next city council meeting unless we get an extension. Alderman Milschewski asked if we can see what Mr. Olson finds out on an extension. Chair Gilson said it will stay in Public Works Committee. PW 2012-01 Monthly Water Reports for August-November 2011 - Alderman Kot asked about one month being higher than others. Mr. Dhuse stated it was the flushing hydrants. Chair Gilson said this item will move to consent. PW 2012-03 Supplemental Letter of Understanding- Committee agreed to move this item to consent. PW 2012-04 IDOT Letter of Understanding Regarding the Proposed Widening of Route 34 -Mr. Olson said the cost is $230,000, but it is not included in any of IDOT's budgets and is probably not high on their list. Therefore, it will be 2017 before this gets constructed and the city would have to put up the money. There was discussion about where the sidewalks and paths would be when this project is complete and can some of the money come from future developers. Mr. Olson stated that is possible, so the commitment could be less than this amount. Chair Gilson stated that if MOT cannot budget for it,why should the City of Yorkville. He stated that when IDOT commits to it, then the city will. Alderman Kot said he agrees,but unfortunately this is how MOT operates. Alderman Kot stated that he will support it because this is how it works,but he stated he is not happy about it. There was discussion about what things have to be included in the widening project i.e. lighting,paths etc. Chair Gilson stated that he doesn't support this. Alderman Kot asked if we go along with this letter of understanding, the city is committed to this. Mr. Olson stated yes. Alderman Kot said he would propose putting this item on the city council agenda for a full council vote. Chair Gilson said this item will move forward for discussion in city council. PW 2012-06 Emerald Ash Borer Grant Application -Mr. Olson said this is an informational item. PW 2012 -07 Blackberry Creek Dam Intergovernmental Agreement-Mr. Olson said the agreement is a state project and the state is funding it. Mr. Olson said that YBSD is part of it because it is their land and their bridge, so it is a three way agreement. Mr. Olson said the potential conflict is the city needs a commitment in the agreement that the city will finish the project if for some reason the state doesn't. Mr. Olson said he feels this is a low risk situation for the city and they have the funding on hand and he doesn't see any future issues. Alderman Milschewski asked if they are putting another damn in. Mr. Olson said no. Chair Gilson said if the state is so sure they can complete it, then why do we have to have in the agreement the city is to pay for it if they don't finish it. Chair Gilson said he feels it is a bad agreement. The committee asked if the county can guarantee it. Mr. Olson said we can ask. Alderman Milschewski said why don't we have YBSD guarantee it, since it is their property. The committee agreed to take this item to YBSD and let them commit to it. Alderman Kot asked if YBSD says no does this item come back to us. Mr. Olson said yes. The committee agreed that they would like to have YBSD commit to this. PW 2012-08 Kendall Marketplace Change Order No. 1 -Mr. Sanderson said this takes the quantities that have been completed this far and some minor extras and the net change is a decrease in the amount of$3,420.19. Mr. Sanderson said the remaining item on the contract is the seeding and it will take place in the spring. PW 2012-09 Bristol Bay Unit 5 -Final Acceptance and Bond Reduction -Mr. Sanderson said Pulte came to the city and inquired about the acceptance of Unit 5 of their development. All the punch list work has been completed with the exception of two minor items that need to be done in the spring, so the city is recommending moving forward with acceptance, which comes with bond reductions. This item will be moved to consent. PW 2012-10 Cannonball Trail and Route 47 Intersection Improvement Update-Mr. Sanderson said this related to Kendall Marketplace some bond funds that were obtained to do this is a permitted project through IDOT. It consists of traffic signal and turn lane modifications at this intersection. The Phase H engineering plans were approved and the permit has been extended to May 2012. Mr. Sanderson said once this is approved we can get bids in February and move forward. PW 2012-11 Tree/Bush Trimming on South Side of Fox Street- Chair Gilson said that he had a call from a resident that stated the city did a great job trimming on the north side of Fox. Mr. Dhuse stated that the city has not done the south side yet. PW 2012-12 Road Patching- Chair Gilson said he asked for this to be added because he received an e-mail from a resident about her street. She said she and her husband have lived there 15 years and since that time nothing has ever been done to her roads in her neighborhood. She stated that they pay over$5,000 in real estate taxes. Chair Gilson said that roads need to be a priority. Chair Gilson said he wants to see what the city can do to find money for patching the roads. Mr. Olson said if we don't have a lot of snow, we will have extra money we can use for patch. Alderman Colosimo said that is the number one complaint that he receives from his residents. Alderman Colosimo said the pot holes are horrible. Mr. Olson said we have money budgeted for hot patch. Mr. Dhuse said that the city has done them all over town. Mr. Dhuse said the city picks the worst of the worst to patch. Alderman Kot said this has been going on for years this is nothing new. Chair Gilson said why do we keep trying to channel funds for other things and let the roads go. Alderman Kot said he agrees that roads need to be a priority. Additional Business: Alderman Milschewski asked if there would be a different way to do the leaf pick up. Mr. Dhuse said the way the city is doing it is the quickest way to accomplish it. Mr. Dhuse said the city is going to do the north side first next year. There being no additional business the meeting was adjourned at 9:02 p.m. Minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Lisa Godwin Minute Taker CITE Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J Q � Legal ❑ NB #1 EST i8a� Finance El 1 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number 4 City Administrator ❑ 9 �4 Public Works ` PW 2012-28 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Water Department Reports for February, March & April 2012 Meeting and Date: Public Works— 5/15/12 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Agenda Item Notes: `,��a cir` (�nitec�' City of Yorkville = p C T `""tB36 WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT 9� o cE ,� FEBRUARY 2012 MONTH / YEAR WELLS NO WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE PUMP THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE FEET FEET FE GALLONS 3 1335 510 205 0 4 1401 665 570 13,072,000 7 1527 1125 554 3,059,400 8 1384 840 476 5,555,000 9 1368 861 578 20,729,000 TOTAL 42,415,000 CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS 7,043,000 GALLONS LESS THAN LAST MONTH 4,142,000 GALLONS MORE THAN LAST YEAR DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 1,368,225 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: 1,228,000 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE: 72.23 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT: CHLORINE: 1,306.8 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 3.69 MG/L FLUORIDE: 511.7 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 1.44 MG/L POLYPHOSPHATE: 914.7 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 2.58 MG/L WATER QUALITY: BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY: 18 SATISFACTORY 0 UNSATISFACTORY(EXPLAIN) FLUORIDE: 3 SAMPLE(S)TAKEN CONCENTRATION: 1.0 MG/L MAINTENANCE: NUMBER OF METERS REPLACED: 10 NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED: 1 MXU'S: 8 NEW CUSTOMERS: RESIDENTIAL: 4 COMMERCIAL: 1 INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL: 0 COMMENTS: 1 MAIN BREAK AT SUNSET&RI 34. ABANDONED WATER MAIN. United City of Yorkville ETA: ' 4§,898 WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT <<E �� MARCH 2012 MONTH / YEAR WELLS NO WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE PUMP THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE FEET FEET FEET GALLONS 3 1335 510 204 3,692,000 4 1401 665 570 22,308,000 7 1527 1125 430 3,119,900 8 1384 840 463 193,000 9 1368 861 550 28,653,000 TOTAL 57,965,000 CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS 15,550,000 GALLONS MORE THAN LAST MONTH 16,929,000 GALLONS MORE THAN LAST YEAR DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 1,998,793 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: 1,231,000 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE: 72.41 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT: CHLORINE: 1,345.4 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 2.78 MG/L FLUORIDE: 419.7 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 0.86 MG/L POLYPHOSPHATE: 905.7 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 1.87 MG/L WATER QUALITY: BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY: 18 SATISFACTORY 0 UNSATISFACTORY(EXPLAIN) FLUORIDE: 3 SAMPLE(S)TAKEN CONCENTRATION: 1.0 MG/L MAINTENANCE: NUMBER OF METERS REPLACED: 12 NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED: 2 MXU'S: 10 NEW CUSTOMERS: RESIDENTIAL: 1 COMMERCIAL: 0 INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL: 0 COMMENTS: 2 MAIN BREAKS APPROX LOSS OF WATER 4 MILLION GALLONS IN COUNTRYSIDE. United City of Yorkville Emn - � WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT <E I� April 2012 MONTH / YEAR WELLS NO WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE PUMP THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE FEET FEET FEET GALLONS 3 1335 510 205 4,604,000 4 1401 665 582 15,535,000 7 1527 1125 549 3,527,000 8 1384 840 466 165,000 9 1368 861 560 29,214,000 TOTAL 53,045,000 CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS 4,920,000 GALLONS LESS THAN LAST MONTH 12,351,000 GALLONS MORE THAN LAST YEAR DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 1,768,166 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: 1,094,000 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE: 64.35 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT: CHLORINE: 1505 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 3.40 MG/L FLUORIDE: 401 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: .09 MG/L POLYPHOSPHATE: 1461 LBS. FED CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 3.3 MG/L WATER QUALITY: BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY: 18 SATISFACTORY 0 UNSATISFACTORY(EXPLAIN) FLOURIDE: 3 SAMPLE(S)TAKEN CONCENTRATION: 1.0 MG/L MAINTENANCE: NUMBER OF METERS REPLACED: 2 NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED: 0 MXU'S: 3 NEW CUSTOMERS: RESIDENTIAL: 0 COMMERCIAL: 0 INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL: 0 COMMENTS: 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� $ 06 Legal El NB, #2 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ■ -_� City Administrator E] Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El� wn sw _© Community Development ❑ PW 2012-29 � Police F-1 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Kendall Marketplace Improvements Meeting and Date: Public Works—May 15, 2012 Synopsis: Pay Request Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Engineering . &bar. April 30, 2012 Mr. Bart Olson City Administrator United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Engineer's Payment Estimate No. 2 Kendall Marketplace Improvements United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois Mr. Olson: This is to certify that work in the amount of$34,495.06 for the Kendall Marketplace Improvements is due to Wilkinson Excavating, Inc., 725 East LaSalle Street, Somonauk, IL 60552, in accordance with our engineer's payment estimates referenced above and attached hereto. Also enclosed is a copy of the invoice, certified pay-roll, and waiver of lien submitted to us by Wilkinson Excavating, Inc. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Respectfully submitted, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. Bradley P. Sanderson, P.E. Vice President BPS/swm Enclosures PC: Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Mr. Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Ms. Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Mr. Rob Frederickson, Finance Director JWF, EEI G:\Public\Yorkville\2011\YO1131-D Kendall Marketplace Improvements\Dots\lpayest02.doc Road,52 Wheeler Sugar Grove, 60554 • 1 466-6700 • 1 466-6701 fax — www.eeiw'• • ENGINEER'S PAYMENT ESTIMATE NO.2 FROM: NOVEMBER 9,2011 TO APRIL 13,2012 KENDALL MARKETPLACE IMPROVEMENTS PAYABLE TO: WILKINSON EXCAVATING,INC. UNITED CITY OF Y ORKVILLE ADDRESS:725 EAST LASALLE STREET,COMONAUK,IL 60552 KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS COMPLETED QUANTITY COMPLETED TOTAL TOTAL ITEM AWARDED AWARDED ADDED DEDUCTED THIS PAY VALUE THIS COMPLETED COMPLETED NO. ITEMS QUANTITY UNITS VALUE QUANTITY QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PERIOD PAY PERIOD QUANTITY VALUES 1 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB&GUTTER,TYPE B-6.12 250 FOOT $5,250.00 82 $21.00 0 $0.00 168 $3,528.00 2 HOT-MIX ASPHALT BINDER COURSE,IL-19.0,N50.2.5" 215 TON 16,770.00 24 $78.00 0 $0.00 239 $18,642.00 3 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE,MIX"C",N50,1.5" 80 TON 6,800.00 6 $85.00 0 $0.00 74 $6,290.00 4 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS(PRIME COAT) 150 GAL 375.00 13 $2.50 0 $0.00 137 $342.50 5 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL,1,5" 935 SY 7,012.50 88 $7.50 0 $0.00 847 $6,352.50 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE,TYPE B 1,000 TON 14,000.00 572 $14.00 13 $182.00 428 $5,992.00 7 STONE WEDGE FOR CURB 880 FOOT 1,144.00 2,425 $1.30 0 $0.00 880 $1,144.00 6 FINE GRADING AGGREGATE BASE 800 SY 1,600.00 $2.00 0 $0.00 3,225 $6,450.00 9 FINE GRADING LOT 1 L SUM 12,500.00 $12,500.00 0 $0.00 1 $12,500.00 10 RESTORATION 5.3 ACRE 20,140.00 $3,800.00 4.50 $17,100.00 4.50 $17,100.00 11 SANITARY MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED 1 EACH 350.00 $350.00 1 $350.00 1 $350.00 12 TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE,4" 1,000 SY 1.100.00 1,000 $1.10 0 $0.00 0 $0,00 TOTAL 87,041.50 SIT,632= $78,691,00 MISCELLANEOUS EXTRAS AND CREDITS VALUE 1 RESTORATION EXPENSES(CHANGE ORDER NO 1) $1,890.31 2 REGRADING OF PARK SITE(CHANGE ORDER NO 2) $20,000.00 3 4 5 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS EXTRAS AND CREDITS $21,890.31 TOTAL VALUE OF COMPLETED WORK $100,581.31 DEDUCT RETAINAGE 5.0% $5,029.07 MISCELLANEOUS DEBITS BALANCE DUE ON COMPLETED WORK $95,552.24 1 PAY ESTIMATE 1 $61,057.18 2 3 4 9 6 TOTAL DEBITS $61,057.18 7 NET AMOUNT DUE $34,495.06 PREPARED BY: ' ✓'�'�1_ DATE: bO + L' TITLE: PROJECT ENGINEER APPROVED BY: �1� _ _ DATE: Lv TITLE: PROJECTMANA R WiMnson Excavating, Inc. Invoice 725 East LaSalle Street Somonauk, IL 60552 DATE INVOICE# 4/25/2012 12300 BILL TO JOB DESCRIPTION United City of Yorkville Kendall Market Place 800 Game Farm Rd. Yorkville IL 60560 TERMS Net 30 Days SERVICED DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT RATE AMOUNT 4/25/2012 Aggregate base course,type 8,restoration, 1 LS 34,495.06 34,495.06 sanitary manholes to be adjusted,restoration expenses,(change order no 1),regrading of park site(change order 2) If you do not have sufficient funds in your account,a retumed check fee of$[25]will be debited from your account. We reserve the right to add 11/2%interest on accounts over 30 days old. Total $34,495.06 Balance Due $34,495.06 WAIVER OF LIEN TO DATE STATE OF ILLINOIS Gty# COUNTY OF Escrow# TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WHEREAS the undersigned has been employed by United City of Yorkville to furnish excavation for the premises known as Kendall Market Place Improvements of which United City of Yorkville is the owner. THE undersigned,for and in consideration of thirtyfour thousand four hundred nintyfive and 06/100 ($34,495.06)Dollars,and other good and valuable considerations,the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged,do(es) hereby waive and release any and all lien or claim of,or right to,lien,under the statutes of the State of Illinois,relating to mechanics' liens,with respect to and on said above-described premises,and the improvements thereon,and on the material,fixtures,apparatus or machinery furnished,and on the moneys,funds or other considerations due or to become due from the owner,on account of all labor, services,material,fixtures,apparatus or machinery,furnished to this date by the undersigned for the above-described premises, INCLUDING EXTRAS.* DATE April 25,2012 COMPANY NAME Wilkinson Excavating,Inc. ADDRESS 725 E.LaSalle St. Somonauk,11. 60552 • SIGNATURE AND TITLE `� *EXTRAS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO CHANGE ORDERS,BOTH ORAL AND WRI 1 "I THE CONTRACT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: THE UNDERSIGNED,(NAME)Jeff Wilkinson BEING DULY SWORN,DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE OR SHE IS(POSITION) President OF (COMPANY NAME)Wilkinson Excavating Inc. WHO IS THE CONTRACTOR FURNISHING excavation WORK ON THE BUILDING LOCATED AT Kendall Market Place Improvements OWNED BY United City of Yorkville That the total amount of the contract including extras* is$100,581.31 on which he or she has received payment of $61,057.18 prior to this payment. That all waivers are true, correct and genuine and delivered unconditionally and that there is no claim either legal or equitable to defeat the validity of said waivers. That the following are the names and addresses of all parties who have furnished material or labor,or both,for said work and all parties having contracts or sub contracts for specific portions of said work or for material entering into the construction thereof and.the amount due or to become due to each,and that the iterns mentioned include all labor and material required to complete said work according to plans and specifications: NAMES AND ADDRESSES WHAT FOR CONTRACT rtucE AMOUNT THIS LiA1 AIJCF INCLDGExTRAS' PAID PAYMLNT DUE Wilkinson Excavating,Inc. Excavation 84,699.31 57,190.58 22,479.66 5029.07 Yorkville Hill Landscaping Landsca a 15,882.00 3866.60 12,415.40 -0- TOTAL LABOR AND MATERIAL INCLUDING EXTRAS*TO COMPLETE 100,581.31 61,057.1$ 34,495.06 5029.07 That there are no other contracts for said work outstanding,and that there is nothing a or o become due to any person for material, labor or other work of any kind done or to be done upon or in connection with said r ter ban Bove dated. DATE l SIGNATURE: SUBSCRIBLD AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME CAA OF *EXTRAS INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO CHANGE ORDERS,BOTH ORAL AND WRITTEN,TO THE CONTRACT. NOTA BLIC f.1722 R5/96 Provided by Chicago Title Insurance Company OF=ilJl�l.S FiE, 1Nl�i�dlVSOIV NOTAr'v PUBUC :1 ATE OF ILLINOIS MY 0Uk4M18,$ I XPIR S 10.62013 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� $ 06 Legal El NB, #3 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ■ -_� City Administrator E] Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El� wn sw _© Community Development ❑ PW 2012-30 � Police F-1 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Game Farm Road/ Somonauk Improvements Meeting and Date: Public Works—May 15, 2012 Synopsis: Project Update Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator EST _ lass From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. <CEc°� �02 Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: May 9, 2012 Subject: Game Farm/ Somonauk Improvements The purpose of this memo is to provide an update as to the status of the overall project as requested by the Public Works Committee. The proposed project schedule is as shown in the attached document. Generally, we are targeting the November 2014 letting. To make the letting date, pre-final plans are due to IDOT no later than July 2014. As far as the improvements, we have attached the latest general plans for the committee's information. The current plans are estimated to be 95% complete. The current construction cost estimate is $6.13 M. If you have any questions or require additional information,please let us know. PROJECT SCHEDULE Engineering Enterprises,Inc. GAME FARM ROAD/SOMONAUK STREET IMPROVEMENTS • United City of Yorkville, IL May 9, 2012 DRAFT Year: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Month: M J J A S O N D J F M A M I J J I A S I O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A I S O N D J I F I M I A M J J A S O N D WORK ITEM City FY: 1 A • • Land Acquisition Final Design IEPA Permit Submittal and Review Pre-Final Plan Submittal Final Plan Submittal Joint and Phase III Construction Agreement Submittal : I � • - . Project Letting Project Award and Contracting Construction GAPublifforkville\201 1\YO1 1 13-C Game Farm Somonauk Improvements\Eng\[Project Schedule-5-12.x1s]Project Schedule Legend Land Acquisition Bidding and Contracting IEPA Submittal and Review Construction LFinal Design r.A.U" I U I AL SI ' RTE. SECTION COUNTY SHEETS NI RELDCA ED J I 1 _ 1550 3-D0031-OD-F KENDALL 141 y x GI+ ar 1 �� STA. TO STA. Y�fI1J I J�p FED. ROAD DIST. N0. ILLINOIS FCEO. AID PROJEC' 50 0 56ONTRACT�O Bl an —,EX y +!r WO CROSSWALK.'^ SCALE IN FEET AV 4" DOUBLE YELLOW --�� s� a O ? WHITE ITYP.1 MOIyAUK M1 _ S�E a p t H" 8" SKIP DASKWHT CTVP.) 2' DASH - V SKIP .Mi LANE LiNf, 1TN[Tf RELOCATED j! O ❑ SEX ROM ` L 4 _ _ ETON r t 9 �? X j; TURN ARROW,tWHI E- + `^-� ' 1 Ln Z RELOCATED + > oiG0NAL. { YE LLOW. 30, C< t Y .1 + j 12" CROSS CROSSWLK r"- WHITE TED Ai S 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 2' DASH 6' SKIP EST. SIGN " A B" LANE LINE.. WHITE + wow 3 d YELLOW. 30' C-C #TYP.i f w TURN ARROW WHITE j a'zo, 15.6 SO. FT. ITYP.Y 24" STOP BAR. n a a z cs aHIT1 i :l 1 S ONAUK STREE�T'_ST+ 500+ 00.00 . i Q w J ~ j RELOCATED J; EXIST.-s GN 24 STOP BAR. 4^ YELLOW 6" RQSSWALK V P.I f 4 DOUBLE YELLOW # WHITE tTY O R�LOCAT 0' DASH _ U1 RELOCATED Wk Y ,1 8" SKIP pA YELLOW RELOCATED 'I T SAORRF�i`lll A E O EXIST. SIGN.; RELOCATED �X73T�aCr XtSIT. SIGN EXTST.S ON + IS T. 51 RELOCATED [ r 8" LANE LINE. WHITE C* + t SOMONAUK STREET ,cnj + EX ROW RELOCATED a x S GAME FAR ROAD STA. 513+80.00 = i f.. - - W _ __-- - - R.TS .. ., R - SOMONAUK STREET z . _------------- ------------ +N 0001 LX NOW u Li C.7 RELOCATED OCATE �r ~ EXIST. SIGN EX---.—SIGN RIB Ar + + i1Hli£N L/ � � �.. � 12" DIAGONALS a fxtST, 1liN $ r YELLOW. 30' C . Y a " NA RELOCATED y _ ',, RELOCATED EXIST. 51GEe ExlST, SIGN RELOCATED YELLOW. 30' C-C ITYP.1 PANEL ASSEMBLY EXIST. SIGN 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 8" SKIP DA WHITE RELOCATE p 8" SKIP OAS WHITE 8" LANE LINE. WHITE j W EXIST. SIGN &U: DASH - _ K !2'" DIAGONAL D EXIST. SIGN . 510-N YELL OW. SI iTl .t SEMBLY G \ k® `+s RELOCATE RELOCATED 8" LANE LINE. WHITE P A5 TURN ARROW, W O T h z�T W Kt SO. FT. 4TYP„1 ir�4 • LU Y J � m O w G 0 � °z z w i i ILLNOIS DEPANIMEM OF TRANSPORTATION SOMONAUK STREET/GAME FARM RDA RECONSTRUCTION PAVEMENT MARKING SCALF.HOR 2. DRAWN BYr,Alt �a FATE SECTION COUNTY ,�TS M 1550 3°00031-04-F KENDALL 141 STA. TO STA. FED,ROAD DIST.N0 1LL1MS FED. AID PROJEC- O W CONTRACT NO. Bi RELOCATED so o so 100 I Z x TECH f C4 4" DOUBLE YELLOW SCALE IN FEET x Z 12" DIAGONALS. i t, W YELLOW. 30' C-C 1TYP.1 Z TURN ARROW WHIT GAME FARM ROAD E II ! � . FT. c rPa TURN ARROW' WHITE RELOCATED RELOCATED WRITE IOTS P«1 8" LANE LINE. WHITE RELOCATED C5.6 50.€ . C Y .1 %IST. SIGN EXIST. SIGN %S . N ! SWALK. TURN ARROW WH S" SKIP DASH, wNITE DOUBLE YELLOW I I W �T 8 SKIP DA YELEO±A 5.fi SO-Ft. ITYP 1 DASH - fi` SKIP I 10' DASH N�P �n r u R W, > RELOCATED 4" YELLOW °� R QENT � HIGH SCHOOL SIGN m E%S PR ROW „„ _ __ I %IE 5P' 51Gd1 RELOCATED + v V6 REVDVE T:%15T. EXIST. SIGN g LANE LINE. WHITE ..r ~� Yd I2" DIAGSM7 J TURN ARROW, HITE S YELLOW. 3O' C-C 1:TYP.? O 15.6 50. FT.x a Y .1 EXIST. SIGN !W7 , B" SKIP RASIif-WH T� _ _._RELOCATED__ y x V1R+[[CL o x 2' DASH - 6' SKIP h F.. EXIST. SIGN e� Q 4' YELLOW 0 24" STOP_DAR, o _ 8" SKIP DASH, YELOW a WHITE ITYP.1 Q �3 KEkiST.ASiGN 1 w z z AT a` V ` EXIST. SIGN 9c Oa RELOCATED XIST. SIGN ..� Q o� x L 24" STOP OAR. ! WHITE l Y .! RELOCATED _ CD X N - O ro ! w + w ! RN RELOCATED TU ARROW WHITE ' j �E%TST SIGW 5.6 50. FT. ! Y .) p —` RELOCATED TURN ARROW WHITE YELLOW .6 '8. iM , RELOCATED 10' DASH©A 30`YSKIP - .. 8" LANE LINE. WHITE N " DOUBLE YELLOW RELOCATED RELOCATED « 51GN CD Sr. SIOI RELOCATED O %IS T. SIGN EXIST. sTG—N .� cn 1 n Q " 'j WHITE [T.YPT Fa. ` C la" cRas#A�Sc WHITE (TYP.l 4 _ Q YELLOW f'cm 1 TURN ARRI* WHITE LAJ ; o _ B SKIP DASH, YELOW � + _ wW 8" S4K P DASH. WHITE ooh 10' DASH - 30' SKIP QASN - G' SK o RELOCATED RELOCATED EXIST. 510N 3! yi EXIST. SIGN ljj o RR11ll 2° DIAGOINALIt + T o YELLOW, 30' C-C ITYP.f o a GAME FARM ROAD N a- Z Z i i IWNOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANEPOIITATION SOMONAUK STREET/GAME FARM RDA 0 RECONSTRUCTION U ,= PAVEMENT MARKING SCALES HONIZ. OR�IIN Bri JMR �a F.A,U. TOTAL S RTE. SECTION COUNTY SHEETS1 N 1550 3-00031-00-FP KENDALL 141 STA. TO STA. FED. ROAD DIST. NO. 'ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECC 50 0 �TTRACT NOt00. SCALE IN FEET ((f� mv-lfg�z 1p n '! B" 5K P'DA YELLOW i + Frr SH 30' P B" LANE L N€. WHITE ARROW WHIT€, TURH ARROW WHITE 4. FT. E Y .Y .6 0. fT, iTY .1 TURN ARROW WHITE• LLOM $" iANE LINE, WHITE O T.fTVP ATED RELOCATED 4'" DOUBLE YELLOW A �!ALS. YELLOW. + B" SKIP DA WHITE xIST. SIGN 1 f 12" 01 ..M DASH - 6' SKIP GAME FARM ROAD s I'Fr- SKIP WHITE STOP, 1 30'C-C r- W H [ Y .1 1L1 _ __ _ _ f __ _ _ __ PR ROW _ +� M1 4" DOUBLE YELLOW Ll ca a _ FRRW ~ .RED. ! -- - �-•-_ ___•_____ ...��.-dis _ . r Feu W �RpZ ! -, - -q•6J3' -.... _ w 7]IPfI- _ y-_._.._._-y-YOO'-'STORABEy-�- ..I _ taww emu¢ U}Z = I EX ROW E% ROW ° 3J C3 " DOUBLE YELLOW Vn"2[gONALS. - RELOCATED RELOCATED �___ __ ! wH STOP BAR. %S . S GN YELLOW. C-C IT;YP.1 ,�.®. o a GN E%IST.,SI J J W R `1L4�" � •• CR0 11A K I I •'� �! GAME FA ROAD STA. 550+14.12 o WHITE iTYP.I j `fib LLS. ROUTE 34 [r" SKIP DASH.'WN11TE z AF ! ASH - SKIP CROSSWALK 5' WHI E ITYP.1 12° CROSSWALK-2— 1 Lij P � ' WHITE ITYP.I •-F ,'"+ � 4'• . TOP AR_ WHITE B•• LANE LINE. WHITE I I kid 4' DOUBLE YELLOW of I �} TURN ARROW. WHITE S A -6 SO. FT. iTYP.1 in I l S" SKIP OASH,_WHLE + Z• DASH . 6' SKIP / f : Z" D AGONAL YELLOW r ; 30' C-C. I 4" DOUBLE YELLOW w a a m i� i � a ca �mo =w yy�r- WHWZ!; 7 JK� VIR mh UJ Y °o � m O w G_ ~ w i ILUNOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPONRATNIN SOMONAUK STREET/GAME FARM R01 RECONSTRUCTION U w PAVEMENT MARKING SCALE IIORIL DRAWN BY.JAR mad PR CURVE i RTE SECTION I COUNTY I5HEETSIN( PI STA. ° 49T+24,50 1550 3-00031-00- KENDALL 1 141 A° 10' 25' 25" (LT) STA. TO STA. D a I1' 27' 33" S_TA, 499+93.54 FED. ROAD DIST. N0. ILLINOIS FEb AID PROJECT R = 45.61'500.00' 62�' L CONTRACT NO. 87 T ° 45.61' STA. 495+99.71 0` TRANSITION FROM, L = 90.96' 3 B-6,24 TO B-6A2 50 0 50 Too E = 2.08' er T ° N.C.0 SOMONALIK STREET STA. 496+08.06 SOMONAUK STREET STA. 500+00.62 al SCALE IN FEET T.R. = 0 C01TON STRE T I IL 'ROUTE 47 STA. 211+2501 (ST 21+682.1'5) S.E. RUN = 0 —f_y ' y P.C. STA. 496+76.89 s TA. 496+16.02 STAN 499+6 7 O f PROP SED 5' P.T. STA. = 497+69.85 ; 38.6' LT 27.51' LT �' ! r PCC DEMALK STA. 500+3§' -6 4 r I a r pi PROPOSED B CURB A GUTTER 8' OFFSi"T T + 8 Q + PCC SIDEWALK Ph0P4SE1�6' + I 59.3' LT cp $v y m FCC SIDEWALK 7.I CC N Z5 4 3 PCC SIDE'WAL'K �� �+ + Z r Ro45'-200'. ' f ¢ ^ R, 5' O V+ } OFFSET S� IB I�A7 _EX Row PROPOSE O B-C12 C �' a � � � r STA. °11• V s 17 5' L �. I Q wxm uj IL in i!n-¢ C�i O W ti ,. . OC 9L a Yo .. -1 f m y' BITUMINOUS-PATH, - - Z m 90,00'00.. CURVk 1 i a• w I c7. ! 8` OFFSET T - H SE o d y z z r 100M EXISTING 4' PCC PRPUS x-61 x4 011" Ph B-624 CURBS 8 GUTTER I GUT E� 00 37DE+�][i +I PROPOSED T' PROPOSED 6' J PCC SIDEWA PC SIDEWALK LK NOTES 10. TRANSITION FRO �& I. SEE ALIGNMENT AND TIE SHEETS FOR -6'2PROP SED B-6.24 '�� x BENCHMARK INFORMATION. CURB !I GU E m LEGEND 2-ALL CURB AND GUTTER ALONG DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE DEPRESSED. SOMONAUK STREET X TREE REMOVAL I PROJECT OMISSiON� i e 7 k L=36.x11 P � � 4 f + I 640 oro+� I } VP ''TA. 49B+T5 SOMON#UK ST. S A. 5OD 62 I ! 1 .a _ I I L o +;w I i ELEV. 627.80 I - v � I VP1.15TA 5(Y 1+50 C w 635 I I L = 7sao, I — V sz.6 s ■ Oai' - _..... �. ..- �— 63. r f w ` K ° 30 YPI STA. 600+01! I °`LO.06'r 4 " I v fix. 3. ELEV. a 625:03 f K °; 75 N CD I --L r I 1 S I ,. " I I 63( 630 _ ��_ _ �-- - L —a ` ' �— + ! I ! Ln 1 , 625 E fRADELZN I _ I 62! % T N PROF I I ; - I I I f r• 1 ST'A. 600-02 Co �fi E 66 u 'LEVi z 625. ` Y t 1 1 L 30.04' ? 62( ui w a 1 I f I �W vP T +a �.. 61` 615 �` L Y. ■F 624 " VP1 STA:-, 495+82• Ld J 610 61C ' r j --- z z 605 _� �f 60! 2 , I 2 Z f I I 60( 600 ! »w •.i m �, N v In m .Ni� V Ia m m Can I r A N�� v IO O CIO tD+"O N N Flo to T O1,m ofl O+D « O V p f o M m I+1 m IT H Iti V I.0 N'r O�Y 5U iD to :0 D r+LO O r�N Lr IT In O� O"Ir v iN O1 m ,y O OI Qi 01 Bpi m ID CO Im m Ip 00 itQ co ID N�� 1-:I� N N I!}rl[1 l!1 UI A Awn, W Ln !0 M ui La O'f I+�F M in M M'k N N N�N N U N IN N 9N N iN N N N�N N N N iN N+N N N!N N M N N N IN N iN N,N <w.. �o m°n m r� �D o cD+a (uo o °n 0 t.a ram m m m ao c I Q "o m+a o 0 o LL 492+00 493+00 4'34+00 495+00 496+OD 457+00 498+00 499a00 500+00 501+00 50240 503+00 .. SUIIAOIIfAUK STREET/GAME FARM ROAD PLAN AND PRO P r.N.u. iviR� ai T 5 +77. 50 0 50 100 RTE. SECTION COUNTY SHEETS pp STA. 508+10.65 - - �� 1550 3-00031-00^ KENDALL 141 D. ' I. 43"7' LT SCALE IN FEET t... STA. 5i+96.06 STA. TO STA. SOMONAUK STREET STA. 507+89.76 Lu 47,6' L FED. ROAD DIST.NO. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJEC' IL KING S 85'22'02•' CONTRACT NO. Bi STA. 511+50.82 y R=30' (TYP.1 Ra30' (TYP.) LT GAME FARM ROAD STA. 513+88.00 = STIR._ 509+40.51 S A, 512+22.4T. SOMONAUK STREET STA. 02452.00 L T W L I' STA. 504+20.51 Exi5TltrG 4 PCC PROPOSED 2' AGG. 52.5' LT W ? SIDEWALK TO REMAIN - ,. ic r: STA. '507+84.85 i 1PR0. D 5' r 22 s SHOULDER 4TYP.I �1T0 EET 'i 1 R■50 "" K S" +- fCC SIDEWALK NAu 6 SO AUK STREET STA. 504+00.15, Z 0'. + p II rr;rr N ''• �� -ego% N CHURCH STREET 99.46'29" . Q a (• lM ,T. q w r .�- v Oo* PROPOSED 8°6.24 PROPOSED 5' r; .. �'.� '►� 24� - - I - ±-hk: r �" BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS 42' LT 5T 3,• �� CURB 3 GUTTER PCC SIDEWALK �� • I EXISTING 4' PCC A. 507+55.29, �� _- + 90'00'00" STA. OO+II . 7 99"532'43' '_ SIDEWALK TO REMAIN F-. L -- �r f °30• '+,a_ R■3O' (TYP.) R=30' tTV05 v PROPOSED 5' ra - $% R0N . ! e_ TA. +24(8 i- T ,6 1 PCC SIDEWALK., R■3Cw- �. IT 5. L PROP, CURVE 2 LT 22' " STA. 504+5U.OB � R�. �' i+ PI STA. = 515 07.39 sr �1 2• !7 OS 9' lR1 . D - 16.22' 13.. ° g%;ROW _-_ - _ Row. �, X R = 350.00' .. ----- T ■ 363.37' , J-1 o ? L = 562.89' r„ 4 �- R l0O 4 PROPOSED BUS TURNOUT .,( /� CURVE 2 x a w r 4• 1, y R=100 PROPOSED B-6.24 p ur A9M 9 ����• •0.04 51 w w3 :PROPOSED 1 CURB 5 GUTTER d O T.R. a 26.00' any+ o ir' W ac a 4 +9T ' a t ! '4a �,�� S.E. RUN = 77.00' WOES � * ADA S[DENAttt' AMPI It SOMONAUK STREET SfiA. c51148167 W I PROPOSED S' ... �'C} P.C. STA. = 511+44.0 c wm STREET tQ BITUMINOUS PAIR P.T. STA. = 51T+06.'LLJ 1� FLAG POLE TO BE z m 20 RELOCATED 2' PCC DETECTABLE WARNING (TYP.) ca a o d Q STA. 503+T2.43 z z i Ly FIT PROPOSED 8' NOTESi BITUMINOUS PATH I. SEE TYPICAL SECTION FOR SUPERELEVAT STA, 503+18.26 I' 2';DETECTABLE NARNINO TRANSITION INFORMATION. LLA� .., AN30' (TYP.) 30 �SOMONAUK STREET tTA:'SO *32. r 2. SHALLUBE DEPRESSEDR ALONG DRIVEWAY: ~ STA. 503+42.47 LEGEND 86'S2'I5"' X TREE REMOVAL +50 NAUK ST.:STA. 5031 .96` SO y ,STA.i 507.`89:7 STREET i SOMONAUK ST._STA.511+$:).67 CAME FARM R6 STA. 513+0 f I ST.'. SOMO A NE L 1 1 K 1 9 f 5 :ET I i SOMaNAm EEEV !Ev . 625 4 I i ELEV 62450 LEY 6 A5 I i = 62fid9 640 f � 6 1 ,IDMOkAUK $T. ST-A. 50440(.15 ! I CHUReH ELEV i 423.90 635 i f VPI 'STA: 51 tao I_�i + f 63(. i I t i f 4 �. ELEV = 62 0 I C €. VPI STA 5051+00. i I r .i E-=200.00' ' . Ln T i. ELEV = .623.00 I �. ! K = 133 I a k L ltlona I f � t ( I , {� w,- f 63( 630 E-= 0.15 .-- cW 1 I K 83 I Ex .'TiNG PR 'ILE f f. GRADELINE I I 2 625 - a __ f PRpP05ED PROFILE GRA-DDEI - F 62(620 611 UJ 615 o s 9 f sic m 10 E , o f I 1 f 601 605 , 600 I l 601 U N N u i o.O r-+in m 10 m 1n 1- In o m 0 m in In O N ul 1n ti � v O ut In v 0 1rl In m O m 0 N to w 09 m d'IFS .y�T m f N-+ N m I''I N f t0 ID m F Q N O rn N 1f}M1 m Iq o t0 m (� O1 N7 !'1 ~ N"'� O N m m V f Q•Q Q 7M1 Ih V1 M Vl 1+1 Ml I+1 M I�] M I+1 M �rj P1 M f f V f f u7 f In f 1n f 1(1'1f1 Ip In In aD T F 01 O'�ry N N NAN N.iN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (V N N N N N N N N N N. "'sue l0 10 l0 1� 'm �0 l0 l0 l0 10 l0 ID lD %0 l0'ID l0 ID l6 ID tD ID l0 10 l0 lQ %0 l0 l0 ID l0 ID IO%0 l0%0 l� .O l0 l0 IO l0 l0 aHW 0 o LL 503+00 504+00 505+00 506+00 507+00 508+00 509+00 510+00 511+40 512+00 513+00 514+00 5+5+00 », SOMONAUK STREET/GAME FARM ROAD PLAN AND PRO PROP TEMP CONSTR t CAME FARM ROAD STA. 523+01.14 RTE SECTION I COUNTY SNEETS NI EASEMENT ITYPJ MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRANCE 1550 03-04031-DD-I!P KENDALL 1 141 PROPOSED B-&12 STA. TO STA. CURB & GUTTER Fill.ROAD DIST.NO. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJEC' PROPOSED 8-6.24 Np PROPOSED B-6.24 O Y.1 sv 0 5 CONTRACT%06 Bl CURB & GUTTER =Z CURB 6 GUTTER u PROPOSED 5' { _ 88�Q'3" 1 y PCC SIDEWALK SCALE IN FEET GAME FARM RD AD STA. 521+00 26 9 - --- _ 4. ACCESS DRIVE I q s Z PROPOSED E0' IL GAME FARM ROAD STA. 519+66.60 Y1 10' TRANSITION PCC SIDEWALK I s RELOCATE HIGH SCHOOL SIGN � �Z N 1 FROM .12 STA. 524++12. 60' LT r A X w + R PROPOSED B°6.24 PROPOSED B-6.24 �' CURB B GUTTER PROP. CURVE 2 PCC SIDgALK �+ CURB ! GUTTER "' I j Ra6O' ` GAME FARM ROAD STA. 525+34ZO 34 LIN FT ST I�A'SONRY ft r I CURVE 3 5 _ CITY HALL ENTRANCE p e STA. a 92.OB'149"7IR7 WALL (SEE DET1fIL) f l N w f I a I EX ROW h PROPOSED lO' D = 16. 22' 13 m EXISTING TREE'TO EkMAIN• - R d PR ROw _ r Ra26 ~-- a , PCC SIDEWALK T = 363.37 _- TREE PRQrECT[ON - _._ .. AND PRESERVATION ! r 1. 4 �� O L = 562.89' ISEE DETAIL) �- _ �1 _ D•, O E 154.51' .04 _ a =0 6.0 S.E. RUNTT.00' 7+06 1f! y PROPS CURVE 513+4 'aw �� - , a� Ra30` -.. 11 BITUMINOUS PATH ' PROPOSED 8-6.24 ~�~- --. Lu PI STA. a 521+TT.5E 12' PC i7ETECT1i9L {I� f + CiIRB !f GIIT R Z A 2 8* 01' 30" IRT! yQ�o� E CURVE 2 jwARN[HG ITYP.1 F-27� 2' PCC DETECTABLE 2' PCC DETECTABLE f r 25 R'3 R a 3.500.00 g f � ,,,� WARNING ITYP.) WARNING (TYP.) 8956'al" ITYP1) Z O Ra30' R�3O' T e 245.51' J k p Q 2' PCC.DETECTABLE ` L = 490.21' Yo ETYP.) �+ {TYPd WARNING (TYP.) Q E e 8.60' Q F_ ' = u s - 2 89'0 ''yi.. r e NC a y - 8915'26" U Z J o o LLI �) z z PROPOSED 8-6.12 T.R. = 0 "? CURB& GUTTER S.E. RUN ■ 0 q Z v W P.C. STA. a 519+32.1 co ED -,STA. 526+35.2. 85.3' RT P.T. STA. ■ 524+22. Lu cj NOTES -. I.SEE TYPICAL SECTION FOR SUPER a LEGEND m ELEVATION TRANSITION INFORMATION. It G FARM ROAD STA. 521+74.81 9.HIGH SCHOOL ENTRANCE ..�W X TREE REMOVAL 2.ALL CURB AND GUTTER ALONG DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE DEPRESSED. ® RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHTING lM GAMEFARM ROAD (SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS) CAME FARM 1RD tlk 519+6.541 6 'CAM FARM L .su 521+r4,E11 i CAME FARM RO. 5T k. 5 i+3450 ENTRANCE i C�HALL�EMhR 1 r s 4 ELE=V a 631.26; ELE:V 631.?�'s I LEV 635.{6 A� 651 I DAME FAE7yll RD�STA .523 t 4 f �' � i JNIDDLE SCHOOL,EN.TRiANCE: I I � 1 { EL 633.62 9 IEV - VPI ,STA. 5241+50. j 64! w 645 1 EIEV a.635.E15- !� L a 2DO.0 VPI STA. 517'i00- E a �a.5 I I { 640 i ? L - zoo.00 1 VPI 6TA. I K a 87 f Elsa' e� ELEV - 632.fi4 52`� � I � � 641 1 - { f _ 1� L r► ' j- e - i 1 E1"EY yr�3Q:54 11 .6 m K = 87 PR P'ROFII,E GRADELME ! E¢e 'I � � � � � � � ul o r EX PROFILE GRAOELINE ii K ■ 1qD 635 ' ,+:, cn Lu Ln - } O r f 631 630 a �_ uj U x I k f y { I I W2"a= 625 .� � __ I1 _ 62! C.3 d i w Y s Q I � I � � I g � 114 � 620 1 I { I ! 62( LL m - { f i BB � 61! 615 I I 1 � �. 1 � _ 611 1 610 1 0 U M �p •• N O N v O c0 tD �''� t0 0o O to O O ao O N N p .~+ in O t0 m m Q n O Ot N N m R! u� C O t0 N in iN N m O m ..1 ,(� t0 O N N N t0 m C' t0 O 11 l0 p T f c a0 N "1 p p OI N O K1 1.7 N f�l N W} N 1+1 M M N N M N I+1 M N pj N MI ul f t0 f tD 111 ,(j ufa L1 u7 Y "-'� M I'.7 N K7 N rn rn m n M P1 rl)M In M M Mf f7 NI Ml Mf W7 M M rn M r l M I.7 M M1 I+1 M �" M1 M M W'I M m M " t0 t0 t0 t0 tD t0 t0 t0 W t0 t0 t0 to t0 'n t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 w t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 tD t0 W t0 to t0 t0 w t0 n0 W t0 IT 0 515+QO 516+00 517+00 518400 519+04 520+00 521 •00 522+UD 523 WQ 524+00 525+00 526+00 527+00 SOMONA1114 STREET!GAME FARM ROAD PLAN AND PR❑ t141 SECTION COUNTY 1550 3•-00031-11) KENDALL Q STA. TO STA. x PROP TEMP CONST EASEMENT FEIT, ROAD DIST, NO. I ILLINOIS IFED. AID PROJEC' IO' TRANSITION FROM I 1 CONTRACT( B1 r!':�+3 i 8-6.24 TO B612 SO 0 S • � PROPnsI -62 f CURB 4 GUTTER ' I i�c.l 1 ,.••", 9000`00" f SCALE IN FEET 84'30'52" I i CURVE 4 a, 1 i All ITVP.) „ PROP ROW I STA. 535+61:03 F R■60' j i A, ' ST A.°53d R ..y 20.0'._ © CD ) I GAME FARM ROAD STA. 531+88.11 + "" �' CURB dEGU GUTTER Y 1 I I ' O in ` �+ EX ROW. �. 1 i BEECHER CENTER DRIVEWAY r w . ' _x3 PROP- CURVE 4 '9 Y EA�! i M PI STA. ■ 532;69.41 12 fff _ "I PR R011 1B A° 4.50' 41" ILT) _ ) R-30 __ __ r - 4 1n r 4. i - Q D ■ 5.43' 46" 7. 6 _ f w O _. -- H - ` ; ;- H R ■ 1000.00' - '- Z - ---- ----- - _ _ -- I :R -- - - -- _ -- -: --- - W L 84.56' ■ 0.89 - s ■ �0. _ - - - E ROW r T.R. ■ Ll V _ � 8' cc 1r t S.E. RUN ° 0 F'- i Q 2'".PCC DETECTABLE :"' � ,.; r �' " P.C. STA. - 532+2T, u� Q 1 YEARNING,I71tP GAME FARM'ROAD STA. 528+35.46 a _ = ?' P.T. STA. ■ 533+11.1 e t TA. 632+2$,78 `�' �. v"z HIGH SCHOOL EXIT DRIVEWAY RT -}j� iv wow PROPOSED $` �., R■30• (TYP.) w a z° I 1 a BITUMINOUS PATH ? ! J row ,d GAME FARM ROAD STA. 527+02.27 �.� 9000'00" ` �JJ1w G' r GAME FARM ROAD STA 535+23.41 uaaasc� LIBRARY DRIVEWAY PROPOSED 8-6.24 2' CONOYER LANE o CURB A GUTTER C7, STA. 631+98.86 z m PROPOSED 8-6.12 _ oc a w CURB GUTTER STA. 531+47.36 J oz 7.5' R ,I G I ' 2" PCC DETECTABLE m YEARNING ITYP.) NOTEf ALL CURB AND GUTTER ALONG DRIVEWA' STA. 531+77.36 BEECHER CENTER SHALL BE DEPRESSED. ®RELOCATE LIGHT POLE LEGEND TO STA. 527+25. 56' RT GAME FARM ROAD X TREE REMOVAL t» �IL CAME FAARM RD, STA. 5,29+31 F f ° GAVE FARM it(), i GAVE!FARM RD.;STA,'535k 2341, BEECHER CENTER CON0GH S O FER � # ELEV 6]3.8D EXI ELEv 634.E9 ELEV ■ S -- 651 655 1 I I { w 650 651�{ I � I 1 - I , � I .. I •.• I. A _..._. it 1. ff I pp 1 ! I #i VPI,STA. 53�i001 ! I I 51A. 635JD5 VP€I EY 34 5 - 1 I 1 { IEV = 636.JpS 64: 645 { �5 ! E .� :ono'• -,� E - ` I lE = 10.10° I P1 TA. 7450.00 L . 1 I L * 1 i I i I EX 'ROFB:E ADEL WE I K e l25 + C2 ELEV. ■1633.k5 I 4 i i .. L - 1i�Ot1Df - E ):10` , PR OF].E GFEAOEI,NE r 641 >s - Dag K + 132 R .-R 125. ". 1 640 + E x_OJ4 - -.. i --TI K 86 C14 L Ln 63. 635 y - ---.__._.-- ran . W j >°wad 630 I d 631 w Y t ° 62. 625 Ic j . I ° LL 'n a w ol o c5 620 _ L - 621 V L I Y : 0 615 w 1 611 N m o�u o{� m�� o o on m n c In o In In r- �n in In r- In m In c In �n ,n In �o�n In to m In cv m c o rn la to T ti to In D 1n n uo n la a la In no r- In I- '4 tom a o r 14 m r a 10 v a° v ad v .o is m to f1+1 N1 1.1 'N1 'r 'r N N' t17 ul N In 1fI N If1 1f7 In tp 1[I tp l6 l0 I+y 71.1 n.l,V1 pq P1 rn M Ml M1 M M rn:" ft1 IN1 M I M M I+'1 M M M M M f.1 li'1 M M K7'. M1 p'1 P1 tr1 M Ml M ry7 M z w a w w w LO t6 Ilp t0 CID tD to t0'10 t6 vlp tD .0 t0 LO 'm IA t0'ID t0'� tD?O t0 t0 t0 10 t0 t0 t0 tG_-. t0 CID t0 t0 w 10 t0 1t1 t6'{O t0 t0 t0 10 t0 10 t0� 0 o LL 527•+00 528+00 529+00 53C K 531+00 532+00 533+00 534+00 535+00 536+00 537+'00 538+00 539+00 ... SOMONALIK STREET/GAME FARM ROAD PLAIN AND PRO RTE. SECTION I COUNTY I SHEETS NI 1550 3-00031-004P KENDALL 1 141 STA. TO STA. FED. ROAD DIST. N0. JILLINOISIFED. AID PROJEC' 50 0 tTTRACT N(jl d ` �• SCALE IN FEET a _@ _ CURVE 5 --CURVE 6 pj STA, . 546+33.75 @ G FA ROAD STA. 539+55. a A- 12.50' 19" (RT) +, 1[PLEASURE DRIVE i __ `_ _ , q STA. 550+08.59 ' f D ■ 19. 05' 55" I r R = 300.00' PROPOSED 8-6.24 '� i 5B.8" L T �, to w Rr45'-200' }:4 n T = 33.75' CURB a GUTTER + i r O N ti i } 8 OFFSET (Z�Q; L = 67.22' + li STA 544+T9.44 j E = 1.89' ' i j ' F C 2 7.8' L T s = N.C. Ir ;'1 a /� Y. STA" 549+17.36 T.R. = 0 W _ _ __ _ -1,22'� 10- _PR R011 _ _ pI° I$.3� S.E. RUN e 0 P.C. STA. = 546;00.00 P.T. STA. - 546+67.22 -- --------- -- c3w $ -y- - - ------------ dOfT 1 --- cx a Z - _ ��A. = 547+00.98 "aw _ 207 x ROW Li 1 if GAME FARM ROAD STA. 550+11.56 A= 12.50' 19" (LT) W • I -1 " APR R011 : ss f ¢ U5 ROUTE 34 STA. 1909+2^5.T4 R = 300.00'55 {, - ak - -- - - - -_ =Ld -I" ,\ .......... ,�t (1 41 11 11 11 t f.,y T = 33.75• I a o. c+ ly i.�IOf. YPROPOSED,PR£CAST L = 67.22' o STA. 5'39+97.0$ -- i - M0�1lLAR TAINING PCC SIDEWALK (8' x 8' PAD) E = 1.89' [ Ra L!„� `�. WALL[SE'E 5H£1T5 9495 1y 2' PCC DETECTABLE WARNING e = N.C. Q w R=3O` PROPOSED 8' 1 1 p =25 - 7A + T 3A r J I BITUMINOUS PATH 2' PCC DETECTABLE � I.7� �Y�-� ' � AN T YfI�fNG CIiRB T.R. = 0 GC ITYP.1 4 Rz40`�2OCY 1 TO CREATE DEPRESSION STA. 539+;4.57 2' PCC DETEC ABLE WARNING (TYP:) PROPOSEt'J BIT 1NOU5 . (UNDER SUPERVISION OF S.E. RUN 0 1. CO11111ERCI ENTRANCE 8' OFFSET l P.C. STA. 546+67.22 WARNING ITYP PROPOSED B-6.24 � FIELD ENGINEER) ' CIIRa A fAJTT�R (SEE SHEET T31 2'SEC=4EY�CTABLE WARHiNG 1' � P.T. STA, = 547+34.45 99 y; A. *67.28 STA. 53W4.ST { STA, 'S39+GT.OB - 55.3' RT9� f NOTE 47.1' RI ' 11 '.. _. � 1 76x39'00" U ALL CURB AND GUTTER ALONG DRIVEW! 4 STA. 8.00. 41' RT TO +' SHALL BE DEPRESSED. STA. 549+10.00. 41' RT STA. 549+60.72 Irr 14B.TRY � LEGEND GAME FARM ROAD w N X TREE REMOVAL { PLMASU+Ii DRIVE STA: 53 +55.95 . e 1 I t I ELEY;= 635.82 6 r v 0 41 645 00 I �- YPI !STA. 544+50 VPI >TA. 346+50 I .S. T 131 SST 909+25.74 f EL1EV = 633.85 + { y _ S A 55A+1i.66 i !i # L. =.:100.00' 1 { El�E - 6��5 AM r 640 °; i o ; E = 0.09 e ' - 64( K . 143 a )t! I -4 f I PPR 0'ROFI.E .ADELINE f i EX O'ROFI.E GRADEL NE g I 635 , !�'I _ y G'I�f- pl i I• r� ! 'j !y � 6 I �.. Pe IS L 66 •_9 ' 0 W ELY I {3 DO:3 ' . 3 I 9 Lo tA 63(630 o 0A. 549+92 62! 625 6 62(620 � I a ir-c 1 44 r w 0 61! 615 W �. oo L05 60 1 -- 60' 0 U Ill -w O Ot In N Ifl N t0 1i! Yf Ol a0 N M O [A f O''O .ti^ m r O^ l!1 N O u7 In Ot Ifl N1 9[I M M w m O m m I� t0 M'1 P N O O 00 m P 10 I�R co Qi O :� O O l0 aD(n a0 lO IO a0 V I� I+t r fV On Oi O t0 tii t0 mi t0 tll l0,to I i ui to O V f 4 Q C Q N M l(1 f Q s M M1 N:M 01 T N 10 N f N O.O pi i~ N"I rn � 1+7 wl M pn rn M1 in M f•'1 In 1+1,� 1+7 � 1.7� 1+7 � �.Al �M I+] r, 1+1 M1 t/1 Ml Ml Ml [V lV fV'N IV N N.� N N i t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 to t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 tp t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 i0 W t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 40 t0 t0 to t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 l0 t0 t0 t0 o 539+00 540+00 541+00 542+•00 543 00 544.00 545+00 546+OO 547+00 548+00 549+00 550+00 SOMONAUK STREET/GAME FARM ROAD PLAN AND PRC RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO...------------------------------ E496+71.89 COUNTY PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 28 AND PART OF N -F KENDAL[ TO STA: ! THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, LLINOIS FED. A EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN THE UNITED CITY 50 D n OF YORKVILLE, BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ?!� FEET) a� SCALE:NTS �N 9 + PROP. CUR QQ 9x414 G� CTf'r t PI STA. = 10. 2! 6 OS yp1 � GQ y$9 D = 11° 21 Vol 5 LOi 1. �W �yJ I� LOT 3 yi, R = 500.0 (1C1J�} P.LM: 02-28-477--006 Y{' T = 45.61' ONNER:BONNIE A MAUSZ? p'`I'� PAN �, �y� S +1 t Z 2 tN..: 02-29-J51-me - - r-DT3 ff L = 90.96 QY T+1tl ] E = 2.08' ��y °6 ��� "'e`°aa RErnaeDtor 1 ` P.C. STA. ` [f �rF P, k; WIC vol 6 vol A 0; $ F•,+f P.LN.:O2-2B J51-OD7 P.T. STA. 1 O2-PA-�T7-GDS Vol L C ONMER S4MDY L NOD GNM[R,: i � '�{ Arm BRYNIE R.smAprEL4T '� mARD W,R'at a I� 4 ORETIDA G MUCK Rl M: 02- MI-OF3 : A JOH NSON Gw ROSV7 torw N0 t NEx E.OM45Cd N RI� K • -47 9 C/]� O� G� S WEIt o2-2 DOB I TT 77A Vpt (�+ ° BOO LD YORKW E CGIMAYMWTY VOt 5 VOl vol y 5 57d10OC O1SIRlcr firs - I am-IF Yh• P.U.h D.E.-MS2 ~ TCE-MS4 W P.U. & .E-M51' Tr 0F010 tW o.• �c�- _____r P17-1� '__ j 1 5°3 00 c FOCl7-TF F , CF004 M01/ 7r Tr W 7r 013-IT PAM; O8-~_ — d AM? f •w 137��ir —"------506Z6 �t f 1J( GAR �rg5;3T 22 -s6i S T RE 1 , � Ot i ! s a� �B"aSH (/A SChI10NALIIG SIRE v_�p@+ �-- UK E I.OIWER a ._-5a� , SOMONA t� 1 vol I I V' 0,0 1 �.sa 70Y f P.r.rE: - ur-oar 02-28-J57-002 LO -aas 012 JAq(L ODCXWER ° .� � QPE WSTY M.AYERS Q 1 1 _LL.L[ i A t 5 A t 1 1 1 2 $4GV �. LO V° 04 Vol I j y01 02-28P-3M56-002 01 Vol 0� b i DOWER J4Y R a V X--1 �( BARBARA McL17Y 40G 0l • QG w ! �1 , 0 Qy y� V01 ] t I COY '° t 2 VOt It W 4 SPRING h I STREET , CAT V I P.tN.: r„ �. T AED) co I 02-OWEM-00 TEIEMA 1 n SP RING ,g '`r r I r 10 l A 3 11 �+C,4� VO vol O VOl Vol I ! I 4 LEGEND 9 10 SECTION QUARTER 1615 1fi15 SECTION CORNER CORNER ----------•—•--- SECTION LINE ----------- QUARTER SECTION LINE O IRON PIPE OR ROD FOUND a REPLACED AFTER CONSTRUCTION �T lYaY Pnar:•brYWD STATE OF ILLINOIS S S --------------- QUARTER,QUARTER SECTION LINE + CUT CROSS FOUND OR SET SEC GROUP,INC. COUNTY OF KENDALL PLATTED LOT LINE a T1 THESE STAKES REFERENCE FOUND OR SET MGNUMENTATION SET 5/8 INCH THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, CRAIG L DUY, AN ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND R PROPERTY(DEED)LINE T2 IRON ROD FLUSH WITH GROUND TO TIE FOUND IRON STAKE. IDENTIFIED BY EngfrlgBtln®•�SLINB'yFnD•P18Tinln�•Lsndea9[ APL T3 COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER 051 I'riYM PEtnM Orlm.YWkv&,YL MW SURVEYOR, HAVE SURVFYED THE PLAT OF HIGHWAYS SHOWN HERE-ON IN -- APPARENT PROPERTY LINE L690.559.7600 T.890.559.7840 SECTIONS 28 AND 29 TDWHSSiYp 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD CENTERLINE a HITT THESE STAKES,IN CULTIVATED AREAS,REFERENCE FOUND OR SET MONU- - L PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN.1<ENDALSL 1WN7T'Y; THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND BT2 MENTATION. BURIED 5/8 INCH IRON ROD 20 INCHES BELOW GROUND TO TIE RE 1510N .COMPLETE AS SHOWN TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND RELIEF; THAT THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LINE 'V 8T3 FOUND IRON STAKE. IDENTIFIED BY COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING SUR- UNITED CITY OF YORI PLAY COREDCTLY OAF FSENTSESAIQUALITY AND OCCUPYMTON ENTS FO .SHOWN PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY UNE VEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER. DATE DESCRIPTION FHEREON AND THAT T11E MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY -------- EXISTING EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY PLE TO BE RETRACED. MADE FOR THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, STATE OF ILLINOIS- PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT ■ STAKING OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY.SET 5/8 INCH REBAR ROUTE: GAME FARM ROAD & SOMONI 129.32' MEASURED DIMENSION m M STAKING OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY IN CULTIVATED AREAS.BURIED 5/8 SECTION:03-00031-00—FP DATED AT YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS THIS DAY OF 20--A.D. 129.32'(COMP) COMPUTED DIMENSION INCH METAL ROD 20 INCHES BELOW GROUND TO MARK FUTURE SURVEY ( ) RECORD DATA MARKER POSITION. IDENTIFIED BY COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING COUNTY: KENDALL ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LANE) SURVEYOR NO. 3359 128,32'—� MEASUREMENT CONTINUED TO NEXT PAGE SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER. JOB*: P-93-033-07 PROJECT*: LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE! 11-30-10 EXISTING BUILDING SEC: 28 & 29 T 37N, R 7 E 496+78.89 TO STA: DRAWN RBM CHECKED: C D SCALE: NTS H U9 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO--------------------------------- A.U. SECTION COUNTY SEE SHEET 4 PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 28 AND 1550 3-00031-004 KENDALI ......................................................... STAI 510+00 TO STAB p PART OF THE EAST 112 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP FED.ROAD DIST.R0.3 ALIAOIS FED. / rr Tr Tr Tr 7T 7T 7r 1T rr rr>7� - --.v--------------------.___.. .._—. —NI 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL so e 5 6C Ci17?D-1 MERIDIAN, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, (IN FEET) SCALE: NTS CARVE 3 BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 1 I Z STATE OF ILLINOIS SS 1 �r 443` ,rj, Vol 40 1-°t COUNTY OF KENDALL f - THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, CRAIG L. DUY, AN ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND T1E-M51 SURVEYOR, HAVE SURVEYED THE PLAT OF HIGHWAYS SHOWN HERE-ON N SECTIONS 28 AND 29, TOWNSHI I P 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KENDALL COUNTY; THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND 1 COMPLETE AS SHOWN TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF; THAT THE 6 _ PLAT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY, THAT ALL MONUMENTS FOUND AND 1 ESTABLISHED ARE OF PERMANENT QUALITY AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS SHOWN THEREON AND THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. MADE FOR THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, STATE OF ILLINOIS. Q} I DATED AT YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS THIS -----DAY OF 20_-A.D. - - - -- -ILLINOIS—PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 3359 LEGEND LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: 11-30-10 Ot 40 I i 'I 40i 4 � 910 SECTION QUART[ TT Tq CORNER Is 15 SECTIOI 77- T7'TT TT �r PuE-M51 _.-.-._ CORNEF (� 1 SECTION LINE �! °„(• '1 GF020 r��, ..._-.:--=.. QUARTER SECTION LINE 1 J,1 1�• n V JL-a 11 �' TCE-M52 QUARTER,OT LINER SECTION LINE •1 �p/v�1.L PLATTED LOT LINE O P.I.N.:02-20-131-010 ANO 02-27-451-007 _L _ 'i' „ PROPERTY(DEED)LINE CI'1 ONO?,EMS -KENDALL XAVT CEAIE7ERY AswaARON `C APL (Fjk/A: THE ELMlfV O OELIE7ERY ASSOQ'A TION) 1 P• ,� '�+ APPARENT PROPERTY LINE PARK STREET CENTERLINE Cl EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LINE (VACATED) PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINE Y, -------- EXISTING EASEMENT C. PROPOSED EASEMENT 129.32' MEASURED DIMENSION 129 32,(COMP) COMPUTED DIMENSION ( ) RECORD DATA 1 PROPOSED CURVE DATA? 129.32- MEASUREMENT CONTINUED TO NEXT PAGE 1 1 A } I } CURVE 2: CURVE 3: EXISTING BUILDING 4 Oi 40i PI STA. = 515+07.39 PI STA. = 521+77.58 Ot A= 92° 08' 49" (RT) A = 8° 01' 30" (RT) Ot 4 O IRON PIPE OR R00 FOUND o REPLACED AFTER CONS S \ D = 35 13" D = 3 13" + CUT CROSS FOUND OR SET t�. -,• R = 350.0000 3,' R = 3,5000.00' ® T1 THESE STAKES REFERENCE FOUND OR SET MONUMENTATION. SET 5/ T = 363.37' T = 245.51' T2 IRON ROD FLUSH WITH GROUND TO TIE FOUND IRON STAKE IDEN11F '1J 1 L = 562.89' L = 490.21' T3 COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER GF019 E = 154.51' E = 8.60' . BT1 THESE STAKES,IN CULTIVATED AREAS,REFERENCE FOUND OR SET M P.M: ti �` )` 1 \ $ P.C. STA. = 511+44.02 P.C. STA. = 519+32.08 BT2 MENTATION.. BURIED 5/8 INCH IRON ROD 20 INCHES BELOW GROUA 02- 73-012 40t ;J \ y \ BT3 FOUND IRON STAKE IDENTIFIED BY COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING I,r1 � •` 40 P.T. STA. = 517+06.92 P.T. STA. = 524+22.29 VEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER. AND A1YaD'&t slum v � 6 ■ STAKING OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY: SET 5/8 INCH REBAR 40 t 9 }0 ■ M STAKING OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY IN CULTIVATED AREAS BURIEC X 40i INCH METAL ROD 20 INCHES BELOW GROUND TO MARK FUTURE SURV Z 4 ,('A'Q,g 40 t MARKER POSITION IDENTIFIED BY COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING ® 101 SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER -4 - 4Z-2Am }� B D \ \ eDRVE 2 1kCTlAEL �• L. d TCE-M53 TT 1 � P.L . m OVERALL DETAIL vol HD ANN a _ _._ SOMONA UK STREW rn t ROIRMT.4 W` , f SO QNAU STREET . .�'�I ^�r•�_s.�.�--• 'yam SOMONA GAME FARM ROA ,a tl PA Flo ■nob ProbeeldW C SEC GROUP,INC. ENIneerin8 Surveying Planning Landscal 651 Pr"Pdnr Ddm,Ywkvvlb,IL 70670 QWNM F 4 TIG'V 4pi t t 3 .653.76BOrx .553.784e. A W 4_ ? 40 RE/1510N UNITED CITY OF YORI 40i 40i 3 y C1 of 7 �� 961 DATE DESCRIPTION RIGHT OF WAY PU ,{• rr,,.,, � y� 1 $� "J 10"N.: OTERESA R.RERARO �' �,�VI 1g6tio ROUTE: GAME FARM ROAD & SOMON) 02-2i-473-010 1�'��A DAND a°tiHaE '$ SECTION:03-00031-00-FP 4 4 Gj Ufi wt� COUNTY: KENDALL JOB*: P-93-033-07 PROJECT*: sc+ ® SEC: 28 & 29 T 37N, R 7 E A G p OC1� 4 01 5 �� i A STA: 510+00 TO STA: 521 �p 0 j I 4° DRAWN: RBM CHECKED: CLD SCALE: NTS o CENTER STREET U RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO.-------------------------------- - F.A,U. SECTION I COUNTY RTE, 1550 P3-04031-DO4 KENDALL PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 28 AND SEE SHEET 6 STAi 533+57 TO STA1 .......................e...........ee.....................ee ee.e....... PART OF THE EAST 112 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP ,i I t f FED.ROAD D[ST.N0 J ILLRIOTS FED. P P.I.N.:CARY,� mw �� � ¢:OM—IF f OWNER: 50 0 25 5f 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL ,9 01 (IN FEET) 46;MERIDIAN, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ® w III SCALE: NTS BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 1 ; I N P.I.N.: 02-29-2718-003 I r OWNERS• RAINIER GALUANO L AND MELISSA CAROL 0. STUDER �a} b AND CAROL L SNDER ) ' 7F Oj I AIN, � ^b� 02-%2,g-DOB j I 1 MARTHAIELR NTT CJ� �" 16, N vol 21 4 J LEGEND SECTION I QUARTER 9 10 I; SECTION 1615 CORNER '' �- pl CORNER 7 11 SECTION LINE_._. _ Ir I _ vol -•-----• -••-••" OUARTER SECTION LINE I 1 ff -•-----•- -- QUARTER,QUARTER SECTION LINE PLATTED LOT LINE PROPERTY(GEED)LINE OWNER&HERBERT 02-29-270-004 1 --_ALL. APPARENT PROPERTY LINE AND PAMELA A.KLEINWACHIER CENTERUNE I 1 '° EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY UNE PLEASURE DRIVE _ ----"- PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINE ---------- EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED EASEMENT 1 129.32' MEASURED DIMENSION 1 I '- ggI 129 32'(COMP) COMPUTED DIMENSION ( ) RECORD DATA � 129.37 MEASUREMENT CONTINUED TO NEXT PAGE t° ? 1 Iwo, EXISTING BUILDING O IRON PIPE OR ROD FOUND a REPLACED AFTER CONSTRUCTION $Q 1� �'jo g'I GF026 + CUT CROSS FOUND OR SET 1p I T1 THESE STAKES REFERENCE FOUND OR SET MGNUMENTATION. SET 5/8 INCH T2 IRON ROD FLUSH WITH GROUND TO TIE FOUND IRON STAKE, IDENTIFIED BY T3 COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER. _�1 �{7",�' P.LN: 02-29-276-006 1 u,l 3I A f 0 FIT1 THESE STAKES,IN CULTIVATED AREAS,REFERENCE FOUND OR SET MONU- F' OWNER&BRIAN D.MORRIS ! Z BT2 MENTATION. BURIED 5/8 INCH IRON ROD 20 INCHES BELOW GROUND TO TIE ® AND KIMBERLY E.MORRIS A Q.( P.LN.:NO PIN ASSYONED I 01 BT3 FOUND IRON STAKE IDENTIFIED BY COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING SUR- OW MARGARET KNELL p VEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER.. (PRIVATE ■ ROAD) STAKING OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY.SET 5/8 INCH REBAR.. ! r_ ■ M STAKING OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY IN CULTIVATED AREAS BURIED 5/8 J INCH METAL ROD 20 INCHES BELOW GROUND TO MARK FUTURE SURVEY A MARKER POSITION. IDENTIFIED BY COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING 4 'J SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER. V° 1 I I.0 `V 6D O� >y,a• P.I.N.: 02-29-277-001 OWNER&HARVEI'A KNELL AND MARGARET E KNELL I OVERALL DETA Is-"& 3 ! �Q5 GAME FARM RDA OWNOPl. DDELOR S C UM GAL r ESHER, ! GARY L CONOVEA AND DIANE a OO/IOIER 1 � STATE OF ILLINOIS Co"VIEW LANE 3 ■nob P�oTemWnelo COUNTY OF KENDALL S.S. T,�a.E -'"" "`"1 #, SEC GROUP,INC. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, CRATG L. DUY, AN ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND I EItO nwfing•Sur4WPg•Pl wWng•Landxe{ SURVEYOR, HAVE SURVEYED THE PLAT OF HIGHWAYS SHOWN HERE-ON IN (7'073-7F SECTIONS 2a AND 24. TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD 6530.M 71NMe 8W.W&7tvIM,IL60650 '��$CC L 63O.tl51-7660 E.630.6GT.T8A6 PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KENDALL COUNTY; THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND 1 w com AND BELIEf:PLAT CORRECTLY BEST OF MY SURVEY.THATALLLL MONUMENTS FOUND AND .1 � ������®N UNITED CITY OF YORI ESTABLISHED ARE OF PERMANENT QUALITY AND OCCUPY THE POSFTif1NS SHOWN ( L DATE DESCRIPTION THEREON AND THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY j - RIGHT OF WAY PLJ TO BE RETRACED. MADE FOR THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, STATE OF ILLINOIS. P.LH.:02-29-MI-015 ' OWNER:DIANE d CONOVER ! _ ROUTE: GAME FARM ROAD & SOMONI GF�73 i SECTION-03-00031-00-FP DATED AT YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS THIS DAY OF _____________, 20_- A.D. - �--- COUNTY: KENDALL JOB*: P-93-033-07 PROJECT*: ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR N0. 3359 LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: 11-30-10 � �� SEC: 28 & 29 T 37N, R 7 E ® r I I I STA: 533+57 TO STA: 543 II �} rw.r.■..w...............ee.r DRAWN: RBM CHECKED: CLD a............ .................. SCALE: NTS SEE SHEET 4 U�: RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO.-------------------------------- f A U SECTION COUNTY 1550 -OMI-00-FM KENDAL', PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 28 AND PART OF THE EAST 112 OF SECTION STAB 528+00 TO STA. F01 ST 29, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN THE ROAD DI .NO 3 1ILMILS I FED. BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. EP ° �5 5 (IN FEET) SCALE:NTS SEE SHEET 5 N j_+TVpg ...■w......f............. .....�..N.... .............a..•.•. 1 pry^ 0�7_$fig l WR +A MIlY2! "... .. a1 0 p VA TB LANE " �j 01 IVgT ROAD) P.I.M. NO PIN ASSIMED OWNERS DELORES C IIES GAIL G RSHD?, Gf'023 LEGEND GARY L CONOVER AND DIANE.I CONOVER --J I [;KlT2S 9 1 SECTION QUART/��yJ��J��• 16 t5 CORNER D 16 T 15 CORNE ••°•-•-•---•-•-•-• SECTION LINE i f-T•-'�•�,�.�♦^ QUARTER SECTION LINE QUARTER,QUARTER SECTION LINE PLATTED LOT LINE T I R PROPERTY(DEED)LINE APL APPARENT PROPERTY LINE 'I I CENTERLINE ® I II — EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY UNE PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINE 1 ——————— EXISTING EASEMENT 1 PROPOSED EASEMENT P.I.N.: 02-29-101-015 '7 I 129,32' MEASURED DIMENSION OWNER:DUNE d CONOVER I 129.32'(COMP) COMPUTED DIMENSION j ( ) RECORD DATA 129,32'— MEASUREMENT CONTINUED TO NEXT PAGE CURVE PRGF4 P STA. =532+69,41 ��� EXISTING BUILDING DELTA =A•50' 40.87^ (LT) fns R =1.000.00 j T =42.316 O IRON PIPE OR ROD FOUND o REPLACED AFTER CONS L =0,8 5 " + CUT CROSS FOUND OR SET PC STA. a 532+2T.11 " CURVE 4 e Tt THESE STAKES REFERENCE FOUND OR SET MONUMENTATION. SET 5, PT STA. = 533+11.66 T2 IRON ROD FLUSH PATH GROUND TO TIE FOUND IRON STAKE. IDENTIF T3 COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING SURVEYORS REGISTRATION.NUMBER. + • BT1 THESE STAKES,IN CULTIVATED AREAS,REFERENCE FOUND OR SET M 1 BT2 MENTATION. BURIED 5/8 INCH IRON ROD 20 INCHES BELOW GROUT BT3 FOUND IRON STAKE, IDENTIFIED BY COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING y VEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER, [1 T ■ STAKING OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY.SET 5/8 INCH REBAR. T ■ M STAKING OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY IN CULTIVATED AREAS,BURIEI 1 I O - INCH METAL ROD 20 INCHES BELOW GROUND TO MARK FUTURE SUR\ MARKER POSITION. IDENTIFIED BY COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING If SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER.. 1 � I P.I.N.:02-29-101-011 I PROPOSED CURVE DATA: OWNER:DIANE,L CONOVER I CURVE 4: QFp71 L PI STA. = 532+69.41 " A = 4. 50' 41" (LT) I D = 1, 43' 0' W I T = 42 30 00 OVERALL DE7 I L = 84.56' ' I P.C. STA. = 532+27.11 GAME FARM fi P.T. STA. = 533+11.66 STATE OF ILLINOIS S S 5t I SEC GROUP,INC. D Y Engira ling•$UIVBying•Planning•LandsM COUNTY OF KENDALL 651 PmM.PoInb@ 0".Y=1KMb,IL 80880 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, CRAIG L,. DUY, AN ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND t&90.8G1.7680 LBsw.7646 SURVEYOR. HAVE SURVEYED THE PLAT OF HIGHWAYS SHOWN 'HERE-ON IN xy.rr aent SECTIONS 28 AND 29, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD E1✓1S�ON PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KENDALL COUNTY- THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND zT 77-7T - UNITED CITY OF YORI COMPLETE AS SHOWN TO THE REST O�MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF' THAT THE 1: DATE DESCRIPTION PLAT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY THAT ALL MONUMENTS FOUND AND RIGHT OF WAY PLJ ESTABLISHED ARE Or PERMANENT OSALITY AND OCCUPY YHE POSITIONS SHOWN s`. THEREON AND THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE-RETRACED. MADE FOR THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE. STATE OF ILLINOIS. ROUTE: GAME FARM ROAD & SOMONI k-41_L,1q SECTION:03-00031-00—FP DATED AT YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS THIS ____ DAY OF ______- 20__ A.D. I COUNTY: KENDALL I � JOB*: P-93-033-07 PROJECT*: SEC: 28 & 29 T 37N, R 7 E M STA: 528+00 TO STA: 536 ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 3359 DRAWN: RBM CHECKED: CLD LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: 11-30-10 SEE SHEET 3•• •.•.......••• SCALE: NTS ik U4 RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO-------------------...------------ RT,, SECTION COUNTY 1550 PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 28 AND STAi 3f 00030-00 KENDAL! _ STA! 541{00 TO STA: ! PART OF THE EAST 112 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP - - Fm I(ow DIST.ND.3 1LIN815 FED. I 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL --� °'` � ._ 0 0 25 MERIDIAN, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ` - --4. i SCALE: NT$ BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. _ `--� - -'--'gam tj lei 84 LEGEND y _ ALM, 02-29-276-001 I y 9 fO SECTION QUARTER O AND SUSAN KIWT29OW 61$ CORNER 1S 15 SECTION ,,�.� 4 13 PROPOSED CURVE DATA: CORNER (if033 1.01 -----------•— sECnoN LINE �� CURVE 5: CURVE 6: ---------- - QUARTER SECTION LINE I �>T PI STA. = ' 19" (.75 PI STA. = ' 19" (.98 ---- QUARTER,QUARTER SECnON LINE ® n" = 12° 50' 19" (RT) = 12° 50' 19" (LT) PLATTED LOT LINE ® ! I 1 PIN:DR-2,-276-001.02-29-276 1-015 D = 19° 05' 55" D = 19° 05' 55" PROPERTY(DEED)LINE AND LOTE Vn?78••406 -All l •y oynrns Fure rc�ve+fer�LLB T = 33.0750/ T = 33.0750, --- - APPARENT PROPERTY LINE Y CENTERLINE CURVE 6 I l L = 67.22' L = 67.22' EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY UNE '� E = 1.89' E = 1.89' PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY LINE T 1, P.C. STA. = 546+00.00 P.C. STA. = 546+67.22 -------- EXISTING EASEMENT r4 sy6 7 17�y P.T. STA. = 546+67.22 P.T. STA. = 547+34.45 PROPOSED EASEMENT �Y 129.32' MEASURED DIMENSION I Y 12932(COMP) COMPUTED DIMENSION ( RECORD DATA CURVE 5 6 129.32' MEASUREMENT CONTINUED TO NEXT PACE d �, vol 1 ILaS.ia.L.Li.LL.C.O EXISTING BUILDING � PC ST 546W0. I �I O IRON PIPE OR ROD FOUND a REPLACED AFTER CONSTRUCTION I Vol �1 + CUT CROSS FOUND OR SET I+I ` IJ • T1 THESE STAKES REFERENCE FOUND OR SET MONUMENTATION SET 5/8 INCH I T2 IRON ROD FLUSH WITH GROUND TO TIE FOUND IRON STAKE. IDENTIFIED BY CF031-$ (� I STATE OF ILLINOIS T3 COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER. 1 COUNTY OF KENDALL ,.S-S, - BT1 THESE STAKES,IN CULTIVATED AREAS,REFERENCE FOUND OR SET MONU- - 1'ol THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I, CRAIG L, DUY, AN ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAI BT2 MENTATION. BURIED 5/8 INCH IRON ROD 20 INCHES BELOW GROUND TO TIE r I SURVEYOR, HAVE SURVEYED THE PLAT OF HIGHWAYS SHOWN HERE-ON IN BT3 FOUND IRON STAKE, IDENTIFIED BY COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING SUR- [� SECTIONS 28 AND 29, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH. RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRI VEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER. PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KENDALL COUNTY; THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF; THAI PLAT CORRECTLY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY, THAT ALL MONUMENTS FOUN • STAKING OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY. SET 5/8 INCH REBAR I Q 'm I' ESTABLISHED ARE OF PERMANENT QUALITY AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS S CF031 I �(J 7j.�� THEREON AND THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SU • M STAKING OF PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY IN CULTIVATED AREAS..BURIED 5/8 I I I� III �''J�O �N TO BE RETRACED. MADE FOR THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, STATE OF INCH METAL ROD 20 INCHES BELOW GROUND TO MARK FUTURE SURVEY I MARKER POSITION. IDENTIFIED BY COLORED PLASTIC CAP BEARING P.I.N.: 02-26-276-002 SURVEYORS REGISTRATION NUMBER.. OMNERS GARY L IMTZBERG �01 1a DATED AT YORKVILLE. ILLINOIS THIS _ ___DAY OF of fyy ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR N LICENSE EXPIRATION DATE: 11-30-10 1,0 01 - OVERALL DETA .? GAME FARM R01 +� I �r C3 8 1 ,1 20 a 6 w ■ P�r�wlw o 1 `, Lp a° ii I SRC GROUP INC. Er4g661 P e®•Surveying Orke. •kY&.Irf O •Candace{ 02- A IC7 � �� 8at Prdiio Pdrt1r qMe.York�a.IL 88660 +fie ; !.638.851.7688 I,830.66a.7B48 P.LN:02-29-276-0107 '� '(;.S ti R Il 10N rran, OMNERS RANIER GALUANO 1 '�' ,q, r� UNITED CITY OF YORI AND ME2ISSA 0.GALUANO I �• ti DATE DESCRIPTION AND CAROLE L STUDER GF074'-re � �,� 0� 2 e� I RIGHT OF WAY PU q i r � � ROUTE: GAME FARM ROAD & SOMONI vol r iv SECTION:03-00031-00-FP 112- COUNTY: KENDALL *� Mm JOB*: P-93-033-07 PROJECT*: P,,cN. n;t 29-ere•-me 22 SEC: 28 & 29 T 37N, R 7 E G AM Nur"rr TER S?F027 I 1,0'1 STA: 541+00 TO STA: 550- PAUV-4 A. DRAWN: RBM CHECKED: CLD I I � SCALE: NITS SEE SHEET 5 r°°r °.r .y SEE SHEET 5 y4 •���• • •rrrrrr ryyla�ay�'�y�r+r rrr.rrr Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 4 ' �► Legal ❑ NB #4 Finance ❑ EST. -� _�ti W36 Engineer El strator � Agenda Item Tracking Number City Administrator Consultant ❑❑ PW 2012-31 ALE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Existing &Proposed Bond Policies for Subdivision Developments Meeting & Date: PW/May 15, 2012 Synopsis: Summary and status update of existing bonds and proposed bond policies for subdivision development. Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/A Action Requested: Informational and discussion item. Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memorandum. Memorandum EST. 1836 To: Public Works Committee --� From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director '{ CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator a= �► Brad Sanderson, EEI kE 1� Date: May 11, 2012 Subject: Existing & Proposed Bond Policies for Subdivision Developments Background/Purpose Per the direction of the Public Works Committee for staff to provide an overview and status update of the existing bonds and letters of credit currently held by the City, staff has prepared the following summary and proposed strategies,policies and procedures to be discussed in an effort to ensure the future timeliness of development and sufficiently prepare the City should we need to seek recourse for incomplete public infrastructure secured by these performance bonds or letters or credit. What is a Performance Bond? Simply stated, performance bonds are instruments of security used by contractors/developers to guarantee the work performed will be completed as specified by the governmental agency approving(and eventually accepting) the public and private improvements. The public improvements typically covered by a performance bond include: streets, walkways, utilities, lighting, grading, sediment and erosion control, stormwater basins, landscaping, and other construction-related items critical to developing any large-sized subdivision project. Supplemental "maintenance" or "warranty" bonds may be required for one-year following the completion and acceptance of the improvements, to further secure against defective work, labor and/or materials. How Performance Bonds are Used to Secure Developments Surety companies extend "coverage" in the form of a bond, to a contractor/developer ("principal") enabling them to enter into an agreement with a governmental agency ("obligee") guaranteeing the completion of the subdivision project. The provisions of the contract are, in general, contained within the language of the performance bond itself, and include some of the following components: • Name of the Surety Company,Principal and Obligee • Date of Bond Issuance • Bond Amount(Penal Sum) • Scope of Work to be Performed • Term or Period for Completion of Work • Provisions and/or Conditions for Default Should the"principal" default on completing the bonded improvements, either by failing to finish within the time specified or not performing the work in a manner as required by the subdivision control ordinance, the bond allows for the "obligee" to pursue the surety company to perform or fund the completion of the improvements up to the secured amount. Bonds vs. Letter of Credits (LOCs) The primary difference between a bond and a letter of credit (LOC) is insurance vs. credit. A surety company(insurance broker) issues a"bond", while a financial institution(bank)provides letters of credit. The fee, or premium, of a bond is a percentage of the total bonded amount, typically ranging between one- and five-percent of the penal sum. A letter of credit (LOC) is a secure line of funds, up to the specified amount, guaranteed by the financial institution to be made payable should the terms of the agreement not be met. Letters of credit are based on creditworthiness and typically require some form of security by the developer. The principal of the bond is guaranteeing the work to be performed,thereby the surety anticipates little to no exposure for payment'. With letters of credit, the bank has set aside secured funds as a guarantee of payment should a default occur; the higher the amount guaranteed by the bank, the higher the fee to the developer. Based on this premise, a letter of credit (LOC) is easier to collect than a bond. However, Illinois statues allow for the developer to choose which form of security, bonds or letter of credit,to guarantee subdivision improvements (65 ILCS 5111-39-3). Existing Bonds/LOC Assessment& Status Currently, the City of Yorkville has approximately 150 bonds and/or letter of credit (LOC) in place for 54 existing g evelopment projects in various phases of completion(see attached). It is customary to have multiple bonds for a single development project, as each bond covers a specific type of improvement or group of improvements within a specific phase of construction. While most bonds/LOCs are for unfinished developments, some projects have been completed or are in their"maintenance"period. Staff has reviewed and analyzed the bonds/LOCs currently held by the City and created a "risk assessment" rating system by development based upon the probability of default and reasonableness for demand of call due to the date of bond expiration, developer activity and percent (%) built-out. A fully- detailed report, by subdivision, of these findings will be provided to the City Council in a forthcoming memo to be presented at an upcoming meeting during executive session. Current Subdivision Control Ordinance Requirements The City's Subdivision Control Ordinance establishes regulations for how security instruments, such as bonds and letters of credit, will be administered. Below are bullet points of Chapter 5: Required Improvements within the Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standard Specifications for Improvements which relate to construction guarantees: • Section 11-5-1: Improvement Requirements Prior to Filing Final Plat— If construction does not begin within four (4) years of final plan approval, the subdivider may be required to revise the plan to comply with new city requirements (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) • Section 11-5-2: Subdivision Securities — The subdivider shall post with the City of Yorkville, a construction guarantee in the form of irrevocable letter of credit or irrevocable bond, payable to the United City of Yorkville, sufficient to cover the full cost, plus ten percent (10%) of the required improvements, as estimated by the engineer employed by the subdivider and approved by the city engineer, to assure the satisfactory installation of required improvements...The construction guarantee shall not be reduced to below fifteen percent (15%) of the approved engineer's estimate prior to acceptance of the public improvements by the city . (Ord. 2004-52, 9- 28-2004). • Section 11-5-3A: Construction Warranty — The subdivision letter of credit or bond will not be released until a one year maintenance bond or letter of credit is posted with the city clerk for ten percent (10%) of the land improvement cost, to ensure that any and all improvements will properly function as design,with no defects before the city council formal acceptance. • Section 11-5-3B: Construction Warranty — A maintenance guarantee shall be required for all landscaping, but shall not be required for improvements that are in private property that do not 1 Surety Companies are required to be licensed by the Department of the Treasury which provides a list of all certified companies in good standing h.gp://www.ftns.treas.gov/c570/c570 a-z.html. serve, benefit, or impact properties other than the one being developed (Ord. 2011-03, 1-11- 2011). • Section 11-5-5B: Construction and Inspection — Construction of all improvements required by this title must be completed within two (2)years from the date of approval of the final plat,unless good cause can be shown for granting an extension of time. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004). • Section I1-5-8: Acceptance of Dedication, Improvements- A maintenance bond will then be required in the amount of ten percent(10%� of the cost of the land improvements, as specified in this title, after city council acceptance(Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) • Resolution No. 2009-39: Resolution for the United City of Yorkville Standard Specifications for Improvements.2 • States that "The City will not consider acceptance of the public improvements in a development until it is at least fifty(50)percent built out, or three years after the roadway binder course is paved,whichever is sooner." • States that "Surface course must not be placed until at least seventy (70%) of the adjacent,private improvements are in place. However, in no case shall the surface course be placed until the binder course has been in place for at least one full winter season. In no case shall the surface course be delayed more than three (3) years after the binder course has been installed." • Resolution No. 2009-40: Resolution Modifying a Policy Regarding Procedure and Authority to Reduce Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds for Construction of Land Improvements (see attached).3 • States that requests for reductions for initial bonds or LOCs less than $1 million "The City Engineer shall issue a written recommendation including the basis for approving, denying, or modifying a request for reduction. Said written agreement shall include the amount of the reduction based upon the Engineer's estimate of probable cost as adjusted by an inflation factor front the initial date of the issuance of the Letter of Credit or Performance Bond to the date of reduction. In order to calculate the inflation factor, the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index shall be used. The City Engineer shall also report the remaining amount of the Letter of Credit and/or Performance Bond after reduction." • City Engineer forwards his written recommendation to the City Administrator for approval. If the City Administrator concurs with the City Engineer's recommendation, the reduction is approved or denied and the City Engineer is authorized to issue a letter to implement the decision. However, should the City Engineer and City Administrator differ, the Mayor has the final authority to approve or deny the City Engineer's recommendation. Developer's appeals of the City Administrator's decision are heard by the Mayor,who shall have final determination. • States that requests for reductions for initial bonds or LOCs more than$1 million shall be placed before the City Council for approval. • States that "The retainage used in calculations for Letters of Credit and/or Performance Bond reductions is twenty percent(20%). 2 Resolution 2009-39 establishes the standards by which all infrastructure improvements are to be constructed.However,because it is not an ordinance,the requirements are not codified as part of the Subdivision Control Ordinance. 3 Resolution 2009-40 modified the policy and procedure and authority to reduce letters of credit and performance bonds for construction of land improvements. However, because it is not an ordinance, the requirements are not codified as part of the Subdivision Control Ordinance. Proposed Strategies,Procedures and Polices The staff, consulting engineer and City Attorney have reviewed the current subdivision control ordinance regulations and prior procedures used in implementing bonds for developments within Yorkville. Based upon that review and actions adopted by other communities, we propose to discuss the following strategies, procedures and policies to strengthen the City's tracking of subdivision completion and defensible position should we have to demand a call of a performance bond and/or letter of credit. I. Revise Subdivision Control Ordinance to require completion of Subdivision within 4 years of initial construction. a. Revise the inconsistency/disconnect between the Standard Specifications for Improvements requirements for acceptance (50% built out or 3-years after the roadway binder course) and roadway construction (no surface course until at least 70% of the adjacent, private improvements are complete but no longer than 3-years after binder course) with the Subdivision Control Ordinance requirements for completion of all improvements within two(2)years from the date of approval of the final plat. b. Clarify the distinction between "final plan" in Section 11-5-1 and "final plat" in Section 11-5-5 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance by referencing the "final engineering plan" and"final subdivision plat",respectively. c. Amend the Subdivision Control Ordinance to provide that "the failure to complete any infrastructure component is a violation of the code if such incomplete component may result in the harm to the system or potential failure of the system. d. Extensions may be requested by the Developer and approved by either the City Administrator or City Council upon recommendation by the City Engineer and Public Works Director. e. Extensions granted for no more than 1 year at a time and require: (1) submittal of a revised construction schedule, (2) updated engineers estimate of probable cost for completion and(3)updated LOC or Bond with revised amounts. f. Require an application fee for construction extension requests. g. Enforce the current Subdivision Control regulations for roadways and binder course installed no later than 3 years. II. Revise Subdivision Control Ordinance to require "Acknowledgement of Public Improvement Completion Schedule"(please see attached sample) a. Schedule outlines when the public improvements are to be completed and signed by the City&Developer. b. Schedule states the City will place as a condition in the Final Plat of Subdivision approval Ordinance or PUD Agreement Ordinance that the development must have all streets, sewers, water mains, street lights, etc... installed in a workmanship like manner within 4 years of initial construction. c. Schedule will require the developer provide proof via a title search that all accepted infrastructure is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. d. Schedule states the developer will maintain the public improvements until they are approved and accepted by the City. III. Quarterly tracking of Letters of Credits and Bonds re:Expiration Dates a. Projects nearing 2 years into construction and less than 40% built out will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer and require an updated Public Improvement Completion(PIC) Schedule. b. Projects nearing 3 years into construction and less than 50% built out will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer with punchlist and require an updated PIC Schedule. c. Projects nearing 4 years into construction and less than 60% built out will receive status inquiry letter from City Engineer with punchlist, require an updated PIC Schedule and formal notification that the project will be in default if an extension is not requested/approved prior to 4 year construction deadline. d. Projects over 4 years into construction and less than 70% built out will receive formal notification of default from City Engineer, at the City council direction, indicating that the LOC or Bond is subject to a demand for call within sixty (60) days of date of notice should the developer not seek an extension for completion. IV. Revise Section I1-5-2 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance re: Contingency Requirement and Reduction of Bond Procedures • Increase the contingency requirement from ten percent (10%) to twenty percent (20%) contingency of the required improvements, as estimated by the engineer employed by the subdivider and approved by the city engineer, to assure the satisfactory installation of required improvements. • Codify the currently practiced reduction and release of letter of credit/bonds procedures as part of the partial or final acceptance process for subdivision improvements. Staff is seeking direction and feedback from the Public Works Committee on the strategies, procedures and policies proposed, as this is intended to be open for discussion before a formal proposed ordinance amendment is presented. For your convenience, the ordinance and resolutions referenced in this memorandum have been provided as attachments. Staff and the City Engineer will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to discuss in greater detail. Summary of Letter of Credit/Bonds March 15,2012 United City of Yorkville Bank Original Current Expiration Notification Development Name Amount Amount Date Reqd? Surety:Doc No. Autumn Creek Phase 1A $2,103,462.35 $316,959.54 28-Jun-07 Yes SafeCo Surety Bond 96346371 Autumn Creek Phase 1A $7,423,831.42 $946,396.58 18-Oct-12 Yes The Fidelity&Deposit Co:Bond#08824717 Autumn Creek-Rt.34 Improvements $726,323.29 $100,000.00 18-Jun-12 Yes Bond Safeguard Insurance Cc;Bond#5027906 Autumn Creek Phase 2 $1,327,792.60 $317,303.84 8-Aug-07 Yes SafeCo Surety:Bond#6414740 Autumn Creek Phase 2 $1,550,252.77 $321,200.38 24-Oct-12 Yes Bond Safeguard;Bond#5030622 Betzwiser Property $10,000.00 $10,000.00 30-Oct-03 Yes First Midwest Bank:No.150008800-201 Betzwiser Property $15,711.30 $136,657.00 29-Apr-08 Yes First Midwest Bank:No.150018041-201 Blackberry Woods $745,798.28 $122,117.30 1-Jul-09 Yes Castle Bank LOC#7000262003-901 Blackberry Woods $2,982,579.59 $1,027,898.45 30-Apr-09 Yes Castle Bank LOC#7000262003-902 Blackstone Bar&Grill $19,985.63 $19,985.63 6-Jun-06 No American Southern Bond#B98804-010280 Blackstone Bar&Grill $7,900.00 $7,900.00 7-Nov-11 No American Southern Bond#698804-014514 Block 4 Black's Addition(Morgan St.TH) $24,476.00 $12,313.06 21-Aug-12 Yes First National Bank-Yorkville:LOC#140 BP Amoco $2,541.00 $2,541.00 1-Sep-12 Yes Liberty Bond Services;Bond#285027359 BP Amoco $18,471.20 $18,471.20 1-Sep-12 Yes Liberty Bond Services;Bond#285027360 BP Amoco $25,425.00 $25,425.00 18-Sep-12 Yes Liberty Bond Services;Bond#285027372 Bridge Street Self-Storage $30,000.00 $30,000.00 N/A N/A Western Surety Co.No.25311858 Bridge Street Self-Storage $13,000.00 $13,000.00 1-Nov-06 No Western Surety Co.No.43228543 Bristol Bay-Phase 1(Units 1-7) $403,308.04 $403,308.04 N/A N/A Fidelity&Deposit Company of Maryland;Bond#8771376 Bristol Bay-Unit 1 $24,200.00 $24,200.00 N/A N/A International Fidelity Insurance Company;Bond#0504706 Bristol Bay-Unit 2 $147,400.00 $147,400.00 N/A N/A International Fidelity Insurance Company;Bond#0504707 Bristol Bay-Unit 3 $378,599.02 $174,260.98 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114152 Bristol Bay-Unit 3 $91,042.89 $91,042.89 N/A N/A Safeco Insurance Co.of America;Bond#6544062 Bristol Bay-Unit 3 $22,349.30 $19,334.94 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114158 Bristol Bay-Unit 4 $140,669.75 $140,669.75 N/A N/A Armor Assurance Co.;Bond#ARM 10697 Bristol Bay-Unit 5 $72,671.07 $72,671.07 N/A N/A Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.,Bond#268000460 Bristol Bay-Unit 9 $1,453,294.78 $847,848.97 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114154 Bristol Bay-Unit 9 $151,468.83 $151,468.83 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114157 Bristol Bay-Unit 9 $10,471.65 $10,471.65 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114160 Bristol Bay-Unit 10 $19,103.42 $19,103.42 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114161 Bristol Bay-Unit 11 $18,025.26 $18,025.26 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114162 Bristol Bay-Unit 11 $1,309,846.19 $657,233.93 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114155 Bristol Bay-Unit 11 $232,023.36 $232,023.36 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114156 Bristol Bay-Unit 12 $7,869.78 $7,869.78 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114163 Bristol Bay-Unit 13 $32,537.31 $32,537.31 N/A N/A Arch Insurance Co.,Bond#SU1114164 Caledonia-Phase 1 $4,135,187.65 $745,764.75 7-Jul-06 Yes Old Second Bank No.2912 Caledonia-Phase 1 $98,669.23 $57,151.80 3-Oct-06 Yes Old Second Bank No.2927 Caledonia-Phase 2 $1,260,271.92 $361,512.45 8-Aug-08 Yes Old Second Bank No.2968 Caledonia-Phase 2 $82,027.00 $69,866.50 14-Feb-09 Yes Old Second Bank;LOC#309000356 Castle Bank(Old) $8,382.00 $8,382.00 31-May-11 No Developers Surety&Indemnity Co.Bond#717989C Cornerstone/Briarwood $600,000.00 $139,678.41 N/A N/A Lexon Insurance Co.Bond#1010743 Cornerstone/Briarwood $1,105,331.80 $337,898.08 N/A N/A Bond Safeguard Ins.Co.Bond#5012882 Culvers Restaurant $45,381.60 $45,381.60 2-Dec-06 Yes Port Washington State Bank LOC#RJ2005-1 Curtis Commercial $18,762.50 $18,762.50 25-Oct-07 Yes Inland Bank&Trust;LOC#20061025 DK Landscape $3,869.14 $298.07 8-May-10 Yes Old Second Bank;LOC#62201001211 F.E.Wheaton $771,402.24 $771,402.24 13-Sep-12 No Fidelity&Deposit Company of Maryland;Bond#08865669 Fountain Village of Yorkville $1,079,916.00 $414,538.10 5-Sep-12 Yes Standard Bank&Trust Co.LOC#11953 Fountain Village of Yorkville $1,244,100.00 $1,244,100.00 8-Nov-07 Yes Great American Insurance Co.:Bond#FS7763560 Fountainview $209,072.00 $54,365.56 1-Jun-11 Yes Standard Bank&Trust Cc:LOC#12045 Fountainview $322,972.19 $322,972.19 12-Nov-15 No Safeco Insurance Company of America;Bond#28S101255 Fountainview 1 $0.00 $0.00 Summary of Letter of Credit/Bonds March 15,2012 United City of Yorkville Bank Original Current Expiration Notification Development Name Amount Amount Date Reqd? Surety:Doc No. Fox Hill-Unit 7 $234,302.50 $41,443.05 6-Dec-09 Yes Old 2nd Bank Yorkville LOC#2942 Fox Hill-Resub of Lot 1 $88,500.00 $88,500.00 0-Jan-00 0 Fox Mill Landing $67,524.60 $15,544.88 N/A N/A Ohio Farmers Insurance Co.:Bond#5947328 Grande Reserve $3,049,410.93 $668,679.58 10-Oct-05 Yes LaSalle Bank:No.5559532 Grande Reserve-Route 34 Improvements $493,595.85 $67,308.53 N/A N/A Bond Safeguard Ins.Co.Bond#5017193 Grande Reserve-Regional Park $524,337.00 $71,500.50 18-Jul-06 No LaSalle Bank LOC#S582610 Grande Reserve-Units 5,14-15,18,20-23,25-27 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 15-Feb-12 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239268 Grande Reserve-Units 4&6 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 20-Feb-09 Yes Bond Safeguard Insurance Co.Bond#5021306 Grande Reserve-Unit 12 $209,211.73 $31,689.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239269 Grande Reserve-Units 12,13,&19a $274,074.61 $37,374.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239270 Grande Reserve-Unit 13&19a $252,514.14 $41,688.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239271 Grande Reserve-Unit 12 $542,403.78 $136,524.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239272 Grande Reserve-Unit 13 $875,399.14 $210,662.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239274 Grande Reserve-Unit 13 $47,250.00 $31,500.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239275 Grande Reserve-Units 14,18,19b,&25 $687,110.68 $141,393.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239276 Grande Reserve-Unit 14 $568,594.00 $160,449.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239277 Grande Reserve-Units 15&22 $505,262.51 $98,430.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239278 Grande Reserve-Unit 15 $1,123,923.00 $264,213.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239279 Grande Reserve-Unit 19 $33,003.30 $33,003.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239280 Grande Reserve-Unit 20 $1,624,467.73 $415,258.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239281 Grande Reserve-Unit 22 $407,404.75 $155,634.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239282 Grande Reserve-Units 23,26,&27 $932,703.75 $100,000.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239283 Grande Reserve-Unit 23 $3,434,369.52 $660,794.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239284 Grande Reserve-Unit 23 $837,036.20 $783,770.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239285 Grande Reserve-Units 20&21 $128,926.05 $25,075.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239286 Grande Reserve-Unit 12 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 15-Feb-14 Yes Platte River Insurance Company Bond#41239273 Hampton Inn(Menards-6th Addn.) $38,424.00 $8,156.10 21-May-11 Yes Western Surety;Bond#70706014 Haws&Assoc. $11,000.00 $11,000.00 1-Jun-98 Yes Sandwich State Bank:No.349 Kalant Office $10,000.00 $10,000.00 N/A N/A Bond Safeguard Insurance Company;Bond#14-81351 Kendall Marketplace $250,000.00 $250,000.00 28-Oct-10 Yes Bank of America;LOC#3100716 Kendall Marketplace $6,046,490.89 $0.00 N/A N/A Traveler's Casualty&Surety Co,of America;Bond#104936839 Kendallwood Estates $1,022,588.60 $179,977.42 20-Feb-09 Yes Castle Bank;LOC#3000221071-900 Kendallwood Estates $4,520,298.60 $1,857,386.47 20-Feb-09 Yes Castle Bank;LOC#3000221071-901 Kleinwachter Property $2,500.00 $2,500.00 4-Oct-12 No Westfield/Ohio Farmer's Insurance Company;Bond 90046344 Kleinwachter Property $226,818.90 $121,245.16 19-Oct-08 Yes Castle Bank;LOC#7000266119-900 Kritzberg(101 E.Center St.) $5,000.00 $5,000.00 N/A N/A The Ohio Casualty Insurance Cc;Bond#3-868-103 Milazzo $30,000.00 $30,000.00 26-Jan-14 No State Farm Fire&Casualty;Bond#93BHM2021 Prairie Garden Sub. $864,761.95 $134,960.50 19-Oct-02 Yes State Bank of Illinois No.2001-27 Prairie Garden Sub.-Resub of Lot 4 $348,963.14 $164,784.74 2-May-06 Yes State Bank of Illinois No.2005-12 Prairie Pointe(USPS Watermain) $27,676.82 $3,774.09 31-May-07 Yes Castle Bank;LOC#7000280686-900 Prestwick of Yorkville-Phase 1 $1,200,000.00 $259,658.65 2-Sep-06 No HomeStar Bank LOC#2005-0902 Prestwick of Yorkville-Phase 1 $3,533.75 $3,353.75 N/A N/A The Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.Bond#3-829-554 Prestwick of Yorkville-Phase 1 $3,702,458.77 $1,554,408.48 31-Mar-07 Yes Homestar Bank;LOC#69432050 Provena/Dreyer Medical Facility $84,848.95 $61,366.01 N/A N/A Continental Casualty Co.Bond No.929341633 Raging Waves $1,642,844.00 $100,000.00 1-May-12 Yes Comerica Bank;LOC 9628335-04 Raging Waves $109,182.26 $14,888.49 27-Jun-08 Yes American Southern Ins.Co.;Bond#698815017299 Raging Waves $76,450.00 $10,425.00 1-May-09 Yes Comerica Bank;LOC#635815-04 Raging Waves $698,023.11 $698,023.11 23-May-13 No HUB International Scheers;Bond#08886773 Raintree Village-Unit 4 $1,694,781.00 $396,809.12 9-Mar-10 Yes Bond Safeguard Insurance Cc;Bond#5035420 Raintree Village-Unit 5 $2,436,108.84 $503,184.11 9-Mar-10 Yes Bond Safeguard Insurance Cc;Bond#5035421 Raintree Village-Unit 6 $2,371,091.40 $891,128.30 9-Mar-10 Yes Bond Safeguard Insurance Cc;Bond#5035422 Raintree Village-Rt.71 Improvements $3,000.00 $3,000.00 18-Jul-08 N/A Arch Insurance Company:Bond#104125069 Reserve at the Fox $30,583.10 $30,583.10 31-Dec-07 Yes Bond Safeguard Ins.Co.Bond#5026777 Rush-Copley Phase 1 $1,172,768.12 $106,607.51 19-Dec-07 Yes Old Second Bank;LOC#2987 Rush-Copley Phases 1&1A $448,733.40 $243,257.88 19-Aug-12 Yes Old Second Bank;LOC#60101004772 Rush-Copley Phase 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 1-Jan-12 No Cincinnati Insurance Cc;Bond#60293062 Rush-Copley Phase 1 $832,340.70 $104,613.80 2-May-09 Yes Old Second National Bank;LOC#60101002503 Rush-Copley Phase 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 14-Jul-14 No Western Surety;Bond#929479574 Rush-Copley Drive B $530,550.00 $530,550.00 17-Mar-16 No Cincinatti Insurance Bond#0532851 Rush-Copley FEC $73,117.00 $73,117.00 2-May-12 Yes Old Second-LOC#60101009607 Rush-Copley FEC $521,415.73 $521,415.73 2-May-12 I Yes Old Second-LOC#6010100581 Summary of Letter of Credit/Bonds March 15,2012 United City of Yorkville Bank Original Current Expiration Notification Development Name Amount Amount Date Reqd? Surety:Doc No. Saravanos Property(Stagecoach Crossing) $213,472.60 $26,039.10 29-Apr-13 Yes First Midwest Bank No.150017273-201 Saravanos Property(Stagecoach Crossing) $490,864.75 $193,573.88 30-Jun-12 Yes First Midwest Bank No.150017273-202 Saravanos Property(Stagecoach Crossing) $525,504.70 $50,000.00 16-Aug-07 Yes Developers Surety&Indemnity Co.;Bond#718566S Savitski Property $18,135.00 30-Jun-05 No Old Second Bank-Yorkville:LOC No.15298 Speedway Station $2,022.46 $2,022.46 21-Sep-07 Yes Safeco Insurance Co.;Bond#6435626 Speedway Station $11,800.00 $11,800.00 29-Sep-07 Yes Safeco Insurance Co.;Bond#6435630 Swanson Lane Estates $188,884.85 $188,884.85 31-Oct-07 Yes Old Second Bank;LOC#361000500 The National Bank $96,767.00 $96,767.00 31-Oct-08 Yes LaSalle Bank LOC#S599947 United Science Industries $10,000.00 $10,000.00 7-Jan-12 No Old Republic Surety;Bond#RL10627158 US Cellular $2,032.25 $2,032.25 N/A N/A Safeco Insurance Company;Bond#6703980 Verizon Wireless $10,000.00 $10,000.00 n/a n/a Feceral Insurance Cc Bond#82160804 Villas at the Preserve $762,214.04 $762,214.04 7-Nov-06 Yes LaSalle Bank LOC#S585845 Walgreens(North) $41,931.25 $41,931.25 N/A N/A Travelers Bond No.008SB103738505BCM Walnut Plaza $18,541.60 $18,541.60 28-Apr-07 Yes LaSalle Bank LOC#S590057 Walnut Plaza $10,904.05 $10,904.05 28-Sep-07 Yes Great American Insurance Co.;Bond#FS7572245 Westbury Village-Unit 1(Pod 6) $1,035,000.00 $1,035,000.00 18-Oct-06 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#98815012754 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $276,533.00 $276,533.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015131 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $333,052.00 $333,052.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015132 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $480,670.00 $480,670.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015133 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $888,735.00 $888,735.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015134 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $73,689.00 $73,689.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015135 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $14,823.00 $14,823.00 15-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015136 Westbury East Village-Pod 6 $429,379.00 $429,379.00 27-Jun-07 Yes American Southern Insurance Co.Bond#1398815015143 Whispering Meadows-Unit 1 $646,063.44 $142,563.44 N/A N/A Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08778950 Whispering Meadows-Unit 1 $2,521,235.09 $428,236.43 N/A N/A Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08780402 Whispering Meadows-Unit 2 $252,641.40 $121,727.22 N/A N/A Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08780403 Whispering Meadows-Unit 2 $3,162,992.03 $717,347.37 N/A N/A Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08780401 Whispering Meadows-Unit 4 $2,947,427.87 $632,599.56 2-Mar-07 Yes Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08825607 Whispering Meadows-Unit 4 $313,727.70 $232,443.71 2-Mar-07 Yes Fidelity&Deposit Co.of Maryland Bond#08825608 Windett Ridge $1,330,156.30 $142,937.37 30-May-05 N/A Gulf Insurance Group No.B21878117 Windett Ridge $1,158,724.04 $227,700.00 N/A N/A Lexon Insurance Co.Bond No.1004373 Wrigley $62,979.40 $62,979.40 21-Oct-11 Yes EMC Insurance Companies;Bond#S38-20-99 Yorkville Animal Care Center $5,000.00 $5,000.00 29-Apr-13 No RLI Surety;Bond#RSB4091676 Yorkville Business Center-Lot 21 $46,200.00 $46,200.00 N/A No NISB Bank Cashier's Check#9374 Yorkville Business Center(Nicor Facility) $792,559.90 $144,101.80 N/A N/A Travelers Casualty&Surety Company of America;Bond#105093176 Yorkville Market Square $29,131.85 $29,131.85 9-Apr-12 No Developers Surety&Indemnity;Bond#719538C Yorkville Market Square $912,800.91 $269,426.31 23-Jul-11 Yes Bank of Deerfield;LOC#532 401 W.Fox Street $10,000.00 $10,000.00 11-Mar-10 No Western Surety Co.;Bond#15269167 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 40 Title 11 SUBDIVISION CONTROL Chapter 1 GENERAL SUBDIVISION PROVISIONS 11-1-1 : TITLE: This title shall hereafter be known, cited, and referred to as the YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION CONTROL ORDINANCE. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-1-2: INTENT AND PURPOSE: The regulations of this title are adopted: A. To protect the interests of the landowner, the investor in land, the homeowner, and the municipal unit; B. To conserve, protect, and enhance property and property values; to secure the most efficient use of land; and to facilitate the provisions of public improvements; C. To provide for orderly growth and development; to afford adequate facilities for the safe and efficient means for traffic circulation of the public; and to safeguard the public against flood damage; http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 40 D. To prescribe reasonable rules and regulations governing the subdivision and platting of land; the preparation of plats; the location, width, and course of streets and highways; the installation of utilities, street pavements, and other essential improvements; and the provision of necessary public grounds for schools, parks, playgrounds, and other public open space; and E. To establish procedures for the submission, approval, and recording of plats, to provide the means for enforcement of this title, and to provide penalties for violations. (Ord. 2004- 52, 9-28-2004) 11-1-3: GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Jurisdiction: This title shall apply to all subdivision of land within the incorporated limits of the united city of Yorkville, and within its contiguous territory, but not more than one and one-half (11/2) miles beyond the incorporated limits of the united city of Yorkville. B. Interpretation: 1. Minimum Requirements: The provisions of this title shall be held to be the minimum requirements for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. 2. Relationship With Other Laws: Where the conditions imposed by any provision of this title are either more restrictive or less restrictive than comparable conditions imposed by any other ordinance, law, resolution, rule, or regulation of any kind, the regulations that are more restrictive (or which impose higher standards or requirements) shall govern. 3. Effect On Existing Agreement: This title is not intended to abrogate any easement, covenant, or any other private agreement, provided that where the regulations of this title are more restrictive (or impose higher standards or requirements) than such easements, covenants, or other private agreements, the requirements of this title shall govern. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 40 4. Standard Specifications For Improvements: The standard specifications for improvements, resolution 2004-39, as amended, which is on file in the city clerk's office, shall be hereby included and made a part of this title in its entirety. 5. Park Development Standards: The park development standards, which are on file in the city clerk's office, shall be hereby included and made a part of this title in their entirety. C. Rules Of Word Construction: In the construction of this title, the rules contained herein shall be observed and applied, except when the context clearly indicates otherwise: 1. Words used in the present tense shall include the future, and words used in the singular number shall include the plural number, and the plural shall include the singular. 2. The word "shall" is mandatory, and not discretionary. 3. The word "may" is permissive. 4. The masculine gender includes the feminine and neuter. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-1-4: DEFINITIONS: The following words and terms, wherever they occur in this title, shall be interpreted as herein defined: ALLEY: A public right of way primarily designed to serve as secondary access to the side or rear of properties whose principal frontage is on some other street. BLOCK: A tract of land bounded by streets, or by a combination of streets, railway rights of way, or waterways. BUILDING SETBACK LINE: A line across a lot or parcel of land, establishing the minimum open space to be provided between the line of a building or structure, and the lot line of the lot or parcel. CITY: The mayor and city council of the united city of Yorkville, Illinois. CROSSWALK: A strip of land ten feet (10') or more in width, dedicated to public use, which is reserved across a block to provide pedestrian access to adjacent areas, and may include http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 4 of 40 utilities, where necessary. CUL-DE-SAC: A street having only one outlet, and an appropriate terminal for the reversal of traffic movement, without the need to back up. DEAD END STREET: A street having only one outlet. DENSITY, GROSS: A numerical value obtained by dividing the total dwelling units in a development by the gross area of the tract of land upon which the dwelling units are located. DENSITY, NET: A numerical value obtained by dividing the total dwelling units in a development by the total area of the development, less rights of way, parks, storm water management areas, and all other nonresidential uses. DEVELOPMENT: Any manmade change to real estate, including: A. Preparation of a plat of subdivision; B. Construction, reconstruction, or placement of a building or any addition to a building; C. Installation of a manufactured home on a site, preparing a site for a manufactured home, or installing a travel trailer on a site for more than one hundred eighty (180) days; D. Construction of roads, bridges, or similar projects; E. Redevelopment of a site; F. Filling, dredging, grading, clearing, excavating, paving, or other nonagricultural alterations of the ground surface; G. Storage of materials, or deposit of solid or liquid waste; H. Any other activity that might alter the magnitude, frequency, deviation, direction, or velocity of storm water flows from a property. EASEMENT: A grant by a property owner for the use of a parcel of land by the general public, a corporation, or a certain person or persons for a specific purpose or purposes. EYEBROW CUL-DE-SAC: A cul-de-sac whose center radius point is less than eighty feet (80') from the centerline of the intersecting cross street. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 5 of 40 FLOODPLAIN: See definition in section 8-7-2 of this code. FRONTAGE: The property on one side of a street, between two (2) intersecting streets (crossing or terminating), measured along the line of the street; or, with a dead end street, all property abutting one side of such street, measured from the nearest intersecting street and the end of the dead end street. FRONTAGE ROAD: A public or private marginal access roadway, generally paralleling and contiguous to a street or highway, and designed to promote safety by eliminating unlimited ingress and egress to such street or highway by providing points of ingress and egress at relatively uniform spaced intervals. HALF STREET: A street bordering one or more property lines of a subdivision tract, to which the subdivider has allocated only a portion of the ultimate and intended street width. IDOT: Illinois department of transportation. IMPROVEMENT PLANS: The drawing of all required land improvements, prepared by an Illinois registered professional engineer, and all accompanying information as required by this title. IMPROVEMENTS: All facilities constructed or erected by a subdivider within a subdivision, to permit and facilitate the use of lots or blocks for a principal residential, business, or manufacturing purpose. LAND IMPROVEMENT: All required on site and off site subdivision improvements including, but not limited to, any sanitary sewage system, water distribution system, storm drainage systems, public utility systems, sidewalk systems, public or private streets, street lighting, street signs, grading and drainageway facilities, pedestrianways, and retention and detention basins. LOT: A portion of a subdivision or other parcel of land, intended for transfer of ownership, or for building developments. LOT DEPTH: The distance between the midpoint of the front lot line and the midpoint of the rear lot line. LOT, DOUBLE FRONTAGE: A lot, two (2) opposite lot lines of which abut upon streets which are more or less parallel. LOT LINE: The boundary line of a lot. LOT WIDTH: The distance on a horizontal plane between the side lot lines of a lot, measured at right angles to the line, establishing the lot depth at the established building setback line. PARCEL: Shall refer broadly to a lot, tract, or any other piece of land. PARKING LOT: An area permanently reserved and/or used for the temporary storage of motor vehicles. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 6 of 40 PARKWAY: A strip of land situated within the dedicated street right of way, either located between the roadway and right of way line, or a median located between the roadways. PLAN, CONCEPT: A tentative map or drawing which indicates the subdivider's proposed layout of a subdivision, including a site plan indicating existing off site roadway connections. PLAN, FINAL: The final plat, plus all accompanying information required by this title. PLAN, PRELIMINARY: The preliminary plat, plus all accompanying information required by this title. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: Parcel of land or contiguous parcels of land in single ownership or unified control, to be developed as a single entity, the character of which is compatible with adjacent parcels, and the intent of the zoning district in which it is located; the developer may be granted relief from specific land use regulations and design standards in return for assurances of an overall quality of development, including any specific features which will be of benefit to the city as a whole, and would not otherwise be required by the city ordinances. PLAT: A subdivision as it is represented as a formal document by drawing and writing. PLAT, FINAL: The final map drawing or chart, on which the subdivider's layout of a subdivision is presented to the city council for approval, and which, if approved, will be submitted to the county recorder for recording. PLAT, PRELIMINARY: A tentative map or drawing, which indicates the subdivider's proposed layout of a subdivision, including all proposed improvements. RESUBDIVISION: The subdivision of a tract of land that has previously been lawfully subdivided, and a plat of such prior subdivision duly recorded. RIGHT OF WAY: A strip of land occupied or intended to be occupied by a road, crosswalk, railroad, electric transmission line, oil or gas pipeline, water main, sanitary or storm sewer main, or for another special use. The usage of the term "right of way" for land platting purposes in the united city of Yorkville shall mean that every right of way hereafter established and shown on a final recorded plat is to be separate and distinct from the lots or parcels adjoining such right of way, and not included within the dimensions or areas of such lots or parcels. Rights of way intended for roads, crosswalks, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, or any other use involving maintenance by a public agency shall be dedicated to public use by the maker of the plat on which such right of way is established. ROADWAY: The paved portion of the street available for vehicular traffic. SERVICE DRIVE: A public street, generally paralleling and contiguous to a main traveled way, primarily designed to promote safety by eliminating promiscuous ingress and egress to the right of way, and providing safe and orderly points of access at fairly uniformly spaced intervals. SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM, CENTRAL: A system of sanitary sewers, serving ten (10) or more lots that discharge either into an interceptor sewer or an approved sewage treatment plant. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 7 of 40 SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM, INDIVIDUAL: A sewage disposal system, or any other sewage treatment device approved by the Kendall County department of public health, and servicing only one lot. SIDEWALK: That portion of street or crosswalk way, paved or otherwise surfaced, intended for pedestrian use only. STREET: A public or private right of way which affords a primary means of access to abutting properties, whether designated as a street, avenue, highway, road, boulevard, lane, throughway, or however otherwise designated, but excepting driveways to buildings. STREET, COLLECTOR: A street that collects and distributes traffic, primarily within residential areas. This street carries between two thousand five hundred (2,500) and twelve thousand (12,000) ADT. STREET, ESTATE RESIDENTIAL: A street of limited continuity, used for access to abutting rural residential properties and local needs of a neighborhood. This street carries less than one thousand (1,000) ADT. STREET, HALF: A street bordering one or more property lines of a tract of land in which the subdivider has allocated but part of the ultimate right of way width. STREET, LOCAL RESIDENTIAL: A street of limited continuity, used primarily for access to abutting rural residential properties and local needs of a neighborhood. This street carries less than one thousand (1,000) ADT. STREET, MAJOR COLLECTOR: A street that serves as a main traffic thoroughfare, both within and outside of the city, carrying heavy volumes of traffic. This street carries more than two thousand five hundred (2,500) ADT. STREET, MARGINAL ACCESS: A minor street which is parallel to and adjacent to a thoroughfare, and which provides access to abutting properties and protection from through traffic. STREET, MINOR COLLECTOR: A street that collects and distributes traffic within intensively developed areas, and is used primarily for internal trips within the planning area. This street carries between one thousand (1,000) and two thousand five hundred (2,500) ADT. STREET WIDTH: The shortest distance between the backs of the curb or edge of pavement of a roadway. SUBDIVIDER: Any person or corporation or duly authorized agent who undertakes the "subdivision" or "development" of land as defined herein. Also referred to as developer. SUBDIVISION: A described tract of land which is to be, or has been, divided into two (2) or more lots or parcels. The term subdivision includes resubdivision and, where it is appropriate to the context, relates to the process of subdividing or to the land subdivided. For the purpose of this title, the requirements contained herein shall not apply, and no plat is http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 8 of 40 required, in any of the following instances: A. The division or subdivision of land into parcels or tracts of five (5) acres or more in size which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; B. The division of lots or blocks of less than one acre, in any recorded subdivision, which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; C. The sale or exchange of parcels of land between owners of adjoining and contiguous land; D. The conveyance of parcels of land or interests therein for use as right of way for railroads or other public utility facilities which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; E. The conveyance of land owned by a railroad or other public utility which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; F. The conveyance of land for highway or other public purposes or grants or conveyances relating to the dedication of land for public use or instruments relating to the vacation of land impressed with a public use; G. Conveyances made to correct descriptions in prior conveyances; H. The sale or exchange of parcels or tracts of land into no more than two (2) parcels not involving any new streets or easement of access, provided each parcel meets the minimum lot size of the zoning district in which it is located. TURNAROUND: An area at the closed end of a street or parking lot, within which vehicles may reverse their direction. WETLANDS: As defined by the Illinois department of natural resources. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28 -2004; amd. Ord. 2008-85, 9-23-2008; Ord. 2011-24, 6-14-2011) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 9 of 40 Chapter 2 PROCEDURE FOR SUBMISSION OF PLAT 11-2-1 : CONCEPT PLAN: Instructions for subdivision plat processes leading to approval and plat recording: A. Application: Petitioners who wish to start the process with a concept plan should at this time submit his application (the original and 35 copies) along with thirty five (35) folded copies of his concept plan, a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the targeted plan commission meeting. As part of the application, the petitioner shall also provide the names and addresses of all landowners within five hundred feet (500') of the application property to the city's deputy clerk for the purpose of sending certified notices of the required public hearing(s). B. Review: Petitioner needs to schedule a meeting with the city administrator, city engineer, and director of public works, to review access, availability of water, sewer, storm water, and other related technical issues, at least two (2) weeks prior to the targeted plan commission. C. Park Board: Petitioner must attend the scheduled park board meeting if the development has a residential component. The petitioner (or his duly authorized representative) will present the concept plan, and discuss how it fits into the overall city park plan. The park board will make a recommendation regarding the petitioner's plan for parks. D. Plan Commission: Petitioner must attend the scheduled plan commission meeting, which will involve an informal public comment session after the petitioner (or his duly authorized representative) presents his concept plan. E. Committee Of The Whole: Petitioner must attend the scheduled committee of the whole meeting, which will involve a presentation of the concept plan by the petitioner (or his duly authorized representative), and informal discussion with the committee members. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 10 of 40 11-2-2: PRELIMINARY PLAN: A. The preliminary plan is a drawing complying with all provisions of this title, and when considered necessary by the plan commission or the plan council, should be accompanied byother engineering drawings concerning required improvements on which final review for adherence to design standards and improvement proposals is based, and from which detailed engineering drawings can proceed. B. When the petitioner does not wish to present a concept plan, he will start with his preliminary plan, and at this time submit his application. Petitioner will be invoiced for the required annexation, rezoning, engineering, and other applicable fees, which must be paid in full prior to being placed on the plan commission agenda. A deposit for legal and planning services will also be invoiced, and is due at this time. Payment should be made to the deputy clerk at the united city of Yorkville administrative offices. As part of the application, the petitioner shall also provide the names and addresses of all landowners within five hundred feet (500') of the application property to the city's deputy clerk, for the purpose of sending certified notices of the required public hearing(s). C. Following a written report from the plan council, and after review of the preliminary plan and discussion with the subdivider on changes and additions that may be required for the plan, the plan commission shall make a recommendation in writing to the city council. D. After review of the preliminary plan and the recommendation of the plan commission, the city council shall discuss with the subdivider the proposed plan and shall, within forty five (45) days, act on the preliminary plan. The subdivider shall be notified in writing of any conditions of approval or reasons for disapproval. E. Approval of the preliminary plan is tentative only, and shall be effective for a period of twelve (12) months. If the final plat has not been recorded within this time limit, the preliminary plan must again be submitted for approval, unless upon application by the subdivider, the city council grants an extension. An extension period shall not exceed two (2) 12-month periods. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page I I of 40 F. Ordinances in effect on the date of preliminary plan approval shall govern the preparation of the final plan. Ordinances in effect on the date(s) of final plat approval(s) shall govern any fees paid or contributions made by the developer. G. Fees for legal and planning services will be billed based on per hour range of work being performed. These amounts are deducted from the deposit amount invoiced earlier, and a statement of account (reflecting the current credit balance) is sent to the petitioner with the consulting bills enclosed. All fees must be current before proceeding to the next stage of the approval process. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-2-3: FINAL PLAN: A. Approval Of Plans: Approval of the preliminary plan shall entitle the subdivider to approval of the final plan, provided that the final plan: 1. Conforms substantially to the approved preliminary plan; 2. Meets all conditions of said approval; and 3. Complies with all applicable, current ordinances. B. Disapproval Of Final Plan: Disapproval of the final plan is warranted if: 1. There are more than minor deviations from the approved preliminary plan; and/or 2. A new highway, pipeline, or other major improvement shall directly affect the proposed development site. C. Proposed Improvement Plans To Be Reviewed: The proposed final plat must be accompanied by twelve (12) sets of the proposed improvement plans for review by the plan council. D. Recommendation In Writing: After reviewing the final plat and applicable minutes from the plan council and any discussions on changes and additions that may be required, the http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 12 of 40 plan commission shall recommend in writing to the city council, within forty five (45) days from receipt of the plan council minutes, either approval or disapproval of the final plat and its reasons for such recommendation. E. Further Review: The final plat then proceeds to the economic development committee which consists of four (4) city council members for its further review and recommendation. Project then moves to the committee of the whole and then the city council meeting for approval or disapproval. F. Prepared By A Registered Professional Engineer: The proposed improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer of Illinois, who shall be responsible for the design of all public and land improvements required by this subdivision ordinance, as provided in the Illinois professional engineering act. The submitted plans shall be sealed by said professional engineer, and shall be in conformance with the city's standard specifications for improvements, and these city specifications shall be the only specifications for the improvements. G. Final Plat Submission: The final plat cannot be submitted to the plan commission until the improvement plans are approved and signed by the city engineer and the city administrator, and all fees are paid, and all required securities are filed. H. Recording Of Final Plat: The final plat shall be recorded with the county recorder of deeds, within thirty (30) days from the date of final approval, or final approval shall be considered null and void. This requirement shall not apply when delay inrecording a plat is due to circumstances beyond the control of the city or developer. I. Final Engineering Plan: Submit three (3) sets of the final engineering plans to the deputy clerk at the city administrative offices for review and recommendation by the city engineer. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 13 of 40 Chapter 3 REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANS AND PLATS 11-3-1 : MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS: The following requirements are held to be the minimum amount of information necessary to convey to the representatives of united city of Yorkville a complete and accurate description of the kind and quality of subdivision proposed. Additional information may be submitted if it will further clarify the proposed subdivision. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-3-2: PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE PLAN: A. Concept Plan: The concept plan may be done freehand, but shall be done with reasonable accuracy and clarity. The scale of the drawing should be one inch equals one hundred feet (1" = 100'), unless clarity or size of drawing dictates otherwise. The following information shall be shown: 1. Name and address of the owner or subdivider. 2. North arrow and scale. 3. Approximate dimensions and area of parcel. 4. Topography - not greater than ten foot (10') contour intervals such as can be obtained from USGS maps. 5. Proposed layout of streets, lots, parks, and nonresidential areas, including storm water control. 6. Number of dwelling units, gross and net density. 7. Minimum and average lot sizes. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 14 of 40 8. Gross and net area. 9. For multiple-family, commercial and industrial areas: a. Location of buildings. b. Approximate dimensions and area of site. c. Off street parking, delivery, and pick up areas. d. Buffer zones. B. Existing Conditions: Presence of any of the following shall be shown on the sketch plan or an additional sheet: 1. Streams, marshes, bodies of water, wooded areas, wetland, and other significant natural features. 2. Location and direction of all watercourses, drainageways, and areas subject to flooding. 3. Location of storm drains, inlets, and outfalls. 4. Existing buildings. 5. Existing utilities, and utilities proposed for extension. 6. Existing streets and streets proposed. C. Location Map: A small scale map or sketch of the general area, showing the relationship between the proposed subdivision and existing community facilities and rights of way, with the proposed subdivision indicated thereon. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-3-3: PRELIMINARY PLAN: The preliminary plan shall be drawn at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet (1" _ 100'), unless another scale is approved or required by the plan commission or the plan council at the preapplication conference. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 15 of 40 A. The following information shall be shown on all preliminary plans: 1. Notation stating "Preliminary Plan". 2. The name and address of the owner, the subdivider, and the engineer, surveyor, and planner preparing the plan. 3. Date, scale, and north arrow. 4. Topography - not greater than two foot (2') contour intervals. 5. The proposed subdivision name, which shall not duplicate the name of any plat previously recorded in Kendall County. 6. Location of the subdivision on a small scale drawing of the general area in which the subdivision lies, with the location of the subdivision indicated thereon, including high water elevations, if known. 7. The recorded length and bearing of the exterior boundaries of the subdivision. 8. Location and names of adjacent subdivisions and the owners ofparcels of unsubdivided land within two hundred feet (200') of property. 9. Zoning on, and contiguous to, the subdivision. 10. Location, widths, and names of all existing and platted streets, alleys, or other known public ways and easements, railroad and utility rights of way, parks, cemeteries, watercourses, permanent buildings, bridges, and other pertinent data, as determined by the plan commission on the lands proposed to be subdivided, and within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the proposed subdivision. 11. The approximate areas of all parcels of land intended to be dedicated or reserved for public use, or to be reserved in the deeds for the common use of property owners in the subdivision. 12. If the subdivision borders a lake or stream, the distances and bearings of a meander line established not less than twenty feet (20') back from the average high water mark of the lake or stream, as determined from flood hazard maps or other data, with said distance and source of data noted. 13. Approximate storm water runoff and detention/retention calculations shall be in accordance with the standard specifications for improvements. Off site tributary drainage areas and discharging routing shall be defined with supporting data as necessary for evaluation. 14. Layout and width of all new streets and rights of way, such as highways, easements for sewers and water mains, sidewalks, trees, drainageways, and other public utilities. 15. Existing trees greater than six inch (6") caliper. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 16 of 40 16. Proposed plantings. 17. Legal description. 18. Site data. (See figure 5 in standard specifications, resolution 2004-39 on file in the office of the city clerk.) 19. Routing to any proposed extensions of existing water and sewer mains, including all pipe sizes, pertinent elevations, and proposed elevations. 20. Internal utility layout, demonstrating sanitary sewer depths, water main looping, storm water routing to and from detention/retention, and locations of existing field tiles. 21. A written statement from the Kendall County soil conservation service (USDA), expressing its opinion of the suitability of the land for the type of land use proposed. 22. A field tile survey, showing locations where exploration trenches were dug, and what was found. B. The following information shall be shown for all single-family and two-family areas: 1. Approximate dimensions and minimum lot areas, in square feet. 2. Proposed building setback lines. 3. Area of property proposed to be dedicated for public use, or to be reserved by deed covenant for use of all property owners in the subdivision with the conditions of such dedication or reservation. C. The following information shall be shown for all multiple-family, commercial, industrial, and other nonresidential areas: 1. Number of units, gross and net densities. 2. Open spaces. 3. Proposed layout of structures. 4. Layout and quantities of all off street parking and loading areas. 5. Proposed building setback lines. 6. Area of property proposed to be dedicated for public use, or to be reserved by deed covenant for use of all property owners in the subdivision, with the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 7. Buffer areas. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 17 of 40 8. Square feet of buildings for commercial and industrial projects. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28- 2004) 11-3-4: FINAL PLAN: The final plan shall be drawn in ink, at a scale of one inch equals one hundred feet (1" _ 100') or larger, on a nonfading, stable, Mylar material. The sheet size for plats or plans shall be not less than eighteen inches by twenty four inches (18" x 24"), nor larger than twenty four inches by thirty six inches (24" x 36"). When more than one sheet is used for any document, each sheet shall be numbered consecutively and shall contain a notation giving the total number of sheets in the document, and shall show the relation of that sheet to the other sheets. Final plans shall include all required engineering and landscaping improvements. See figure 6 in standard specifications, resolution 2004-39, on file in the office of the city clerk. A. The following information shall be shown on all final plats: 1. Legal Description: Legal descriptions shall commence at the intersections of section lines and/or quarter section lines whenreasonably practical to do so. The developer shall also submit the final plat to the city in digital form, in a format acceptable to the city. The coordinate system for the final plat shall be NAD27 Illinois state planes, east zone, U.S. foot (IL-E). 2. Monuments: All monuments erected, corners, and other points established in the field in their proper places. The material of which monuments, corners, or other points are made shall be noted as the representation thereof, or by legend, except lot corners need not be shown. 3. Exterior Boundary Lines: The exact length and bearing of all exterior boundary lines, public grounds, meander lines, and easements, unless they parallel a noted boundary. 4. Width: The exact width of all easements, streets, and alleys. 5. Lot Lines: The dimensions of all lot lines, to the nearest one-hundredth (1/loo) of a foot. 6. Setback Lines: Building setback lines on all lots. 7. Consecutive Numbering And Lettering: All lots consecutively numbered within consecutively lettered blocks. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 18 of 40 8. Lot Angles: The number of degrees, minutes, and seconds of all lot angles or bearings of same, other than ninety degrees (90°), except that when the line in any tier of lots is parallel, it shall be sufficient to mark only the outer lots. When any angle is between a curve and its tangent, the angle shown shall be that between the tangent and the main chord of the curve. When between curves of different radii, the angle between the main chords shall be shown. 9. Circular Curves: When a street is on a circular curve, the main chord of the centerline shall be drawn as a dotted line in its proper place; and, either on it, or preferably in adjoining table, shall be noted its bearing and length, the radius of the circle of which the curve is a part, and the central angle extended. The lot lines on the street sides may be shown in the same manner, or by bearings and distances. When a circular curve of thirty foot (30') radius or less is used to round off the intersection between two (2) straight lines, it shall be tangent to both straight lines; it shall be sufficient to show on the plat the radius of the curve and the tangent distances from the points of curvature to a point of intersection of the straight lines. 10. Street Names: The name of each road or street in the plat shall be printed thereon, which name shall not duplicate the name of any other street, unless it is an extension thereof. 11. Abutment: Abutting state highway lines and streets of adjoining plats shown in their proper location by dotted lines. The width and names of these streets and highways and plats shallalso be given. 12. Dedicated Lands: All lands dedicated to public use, including roads and streets, shall be clearly marked. 13. Watercourses And Drainage: All watercourses, drainage ditches, and other existing features pertinent to subdivision. 14. Access To Lakes Or Streams: Where provisions are made for access from any subdivision to any lake or stream, the plat shall show the area over which the access is provided to the lake or stream, together with a small scale drawing, clearly indicating the location of the subdivision in relation to the lake or stream, and the location of the area over which access is provided. 15. Monuments: The description and location of all survey monuments placed in the subdivision shall be shown upon final plat. Permanent monuments shall be of concrete, reinforced with one number four (4) vertical rod, and not less than four inches (4") square on top, tapered to six inches (6") square at the bottom, and thirty six inches (36") long, set flush with the adjacent ground. Each permanent monument shall have a suitable mark in the center of the top. Permanent monuments shall be erected at all corners or changes in bearing of the exterior boundary. Metal monuments not less than one-half inch (1/2") in diameter and twenty four inches (24") in length shall be placed in the ground at all lot corners, intersections of streets, intersections of streets and alleys with plat boundary lines, and at all points on street, alley, and boundary lines where there is a change in direction or curvature. All monuments and stakes shall be set in the ground before the streets and alleys are accepted for public maintenance. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 19 of 40 16. Survey: A surveyor holding a current, valid registration in Illinois shall perform the survey, and if the error in the latitude and departure closure of the survey is greater than the ratio of one in five thousand (1/5,000), the plat may be rejected. 17. Certificates Of Approval: Certificates of approval to be shown on final plat, as applicable: a. Surveyor. b. Owner. c. Notary. d. City administrator. e. Township highway commissioner, if applicable. f. County supervisor of highways, if applicable. g. Illinois department of transportation, if applicable. h. City clerk. i. City plan commission, chairman. j. Mayor. k. County clerk. I. County recorder. m. City engineer. n. School district certificate. o. Drainage overlay certificate, if applicable. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) Chapter 4 DESIGN STANDARDS http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 20 of 40 11-4-1 : GENERAL: A. When laying out a subdivision, the developer shall: 1. Take into account, and comply with, officially adopted plans; 2. Conform to existing street patterns where such streets are contiguous to the proposed subdivision or may reasonably be projected through the subdivision; 3. Design the arrangement of uses in relation to topography and drainage conditions; 4. Consider all natural features, such as streams, lakes, ponds, tree cover, etc., and incorporate these features into the development; 5. Consider street names. Streets that are extensions of, or obviously in alignment with, existing streets shall bear the name of the existing streets; however, no other streets shall bear names which duplicate or nearly duplicate so as to be confused with the names of existing streets; 6. Reserve a minimum of one historical street name from the list on file in the engineer's office, prior to the recording of final plat, as set forth in the historical street name resolution; 7. Take into account future development, including street and utility extensions; 8. Consider the implementation of traffic calming measures, which the city may require on a case by case basis. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-2: PUBLIC SITES AND OPEN SPACES: Where a proposed park, playground, school, or other public useshown on any official adopted city, township, county, or state plan or map is located in whole or in part in a subdivision, appropriate public agencies and governing bodies shall be given an opportunity http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 21 of 40 to begin, within one year from the date of recording of the final plat, procedures to acquire said acreage. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-3: STANDARDS: The united city of Yorkville "standard specifications for improvements", resolution 2004-39 on file in the city clerk's office, and the Yorkville park board "park development standards", on file in the city clerk's office, shall be incorporated herein, and shall apply to any and all development, not only subdivisions. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-4: HALF STREETS: Half streets shall be prohibited, except where essential to the reasonable development of the subdivision, and in conformity with the other requirements of these regulations, and where the plan commission finds it will be practicable to require the dedication of the other half when the adjoining property is subdivided. A right of way width of not less than forty feet (40'), and a pavement width of not less than twenty two and one-half feet (221/2'), shall be required for the half street. Where a half street is adjacent to a tract to be subdivided, the other half of the street shall be platted and constructed within such tract. In cases where half streets are accepted, the owner and subdivider shall be required to grade and improve the half street, the same as all other subdivision streets. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-5: ALLEYS: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 22 of 40 A. Alleys shall be provided in all commercial and industrial districts, except that the city may waive this requirement where another definite and assured provision is made for service access, such as off street loading and parking consistent with, and adequate for, the uses proposed. B. Alleys shall not be approved in residential areas, unless necessary because of topography or other exceptional circumstances. C. Alley widths shall be not less than twenty four feet (24'). D. Dead end alleys shall be prohibited. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-6: STREET JOGS: Street intersection jogs with centerline offsets of less than one hundred fifty feet (150') shall be prohibited. (Ord. 2004-52,9-28-2004) 11-4-7: STREET INTERSECTIONS: Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles. Proposed intersections at angles of less than eighty degrees (80°) shall not be acceptable. (Ord. 2004- 52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 23 of 40 11-4-8: BLOCKS: A. The length, width, and shapes of blocks shall be such as are appropriate for the locality and the type of development contemplated, but block length in residential areas shall not exceed one thousand three hundred twenty feet (1,320'), nor have less than sufficient width to provide two (2) tiers of lots of appropriate depth between street lines, except that one tier of lots may back onto a limited access highway, railroad right of way, or major street, provided suitable screen planting contained in a no access reservation strip along the rear property line is provided. B. Paved and fenced pedestrian crosswalks, not less than ten feet (10') wide, may be required by the plan commission through the center of blocks more than nine hundred feet (900') long, where deemed essential to provide circulation or access to schools, playgrounds, shopping centers, transportation, and other community facilities. Paving shall be three inches (3") of bituminous concrete surface course on ten inches (10") of compacted CA-6 base. Fencing shall be four foot (4') high continuous chainlink fence on both sides of the walkway on an easement. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-4-9: LOTS: A. All lots shall meet the minimum depth, width, and area requirements of the zoning ordinance. B. The size, shape, and orientation of lots shall be appropriate for the location of the subdivision, and for the type of development and use contemplated. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 24 of 40 C. Depth and width of properties reserved or laid out for commercial and industrial purposes shall be adequate to provide for off street service and parking facilities. D. Fronting of residential lots onto state and county highways is prohibited. Also prohibited is the fronting of residential lots onto any proposed major thoroughfare or major collectors, as designated by the comprehensive plan. Subdivision entrances for residential uses, and/or major entrances for commercial, industrial, and institutional uses shall be located not less than one thousand three hundred feet (1,300') apart, centerline tocenterline, unless topography or existing street locations dictate otherwise. E. Excessive depth in relation to width shall be avoided. F. All lots shall front or abut on a public street. G. Side lot lines shall be substantially at right angles or radial to street lines. H. Double frontage and reversed frontage lots shall be avoided, except where necessary to overcome specific disadvantages of topography and orientation, and where a limited access highway, railroad right of way, major street, or similar situation exists; in which case, double frontage lots shall be provided with suitable screen planting contained in a no access reservation strip along the rear property line and the right of way. When deemed necessary by the plan commission, double frontage lots shall have additional depth to further protect the proposed use from rear lot line traffic. I. Subdivisions must include the entire parcel being divided, and may have no exceptions or exclusions; and shall not contain "leftover" pieces, corners, or remnants of land. J. Lot widths shall be measured at the building setback line, and may be reduced ten percent (10%) at the end of a cul-de-sac, providing the lot area meets the requirements of the zoning ordinance. K. Corner lots shall have a buildable area equal to or greater than the smallest interior lot on the same block. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 25 of 40 11-4-10: EASEMENTS: A. Easements shall be provided at the rear of all lots. Such utility easement shall be at least ten feet (10') wide on each lot, and normally centered upon the rear or side lot lines. Easements will be required for all storm water control facilities and for overflow routes. The city may require wider easements and easements at other locations to accommodate proposed utilities and to provide space for future utilities. B. Easements shall be provided at the side of all lots, and shall be at least five feet (5) wide on each lot, immediately adjacent to the property line. C. Easements shall be provided along both sides of all rights of way, immediately adjacent and parallel, to said right of way. This easement shall be for utilities. Evidence shall be furnished to the plan commission that the individual utility companies or the organization responsible for furnishing the service involved have reviewed easements, and any easement provisions to be incorporated on the plat or in the deeds. D. Where a watercourse, drainage channel, stream, or other body of water traverses a subdivision, appropriate dedications or easement provisions, with adequate width or construction to accommodate observed, computed, or anticipated storm water drainage through and from the subdivision, shall be made. The width of the easement shall be dependent on the area of land drained by the watercourse, and wide enough to allow access for construction and maintenance equipment. E. Screen planting easement(s) may be required in accordance with the landscape ordinance'. If said easement is to also be used for public utilities, only such plant materials that have an ultimate growth not exceeding fifteen feet (15') shall be used. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 26 of 40 Chapter 5 REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS 11-5-1 : IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO FILING FINAL PLAT: Upon approval of both the final plan and the plans and specifications for the required subdivision improvements by the plan commission, director of public works, and the city engineer, and upon approval of the appropriate agencies as evidenced by state and county permits, where required, the subdivider shall construct and install the required subdivision improvements prior to filing the final plat with the plan commission for final approval. If construction does not begin within four (4) years of final plan approval, the subdivider may be required to revise the plan to comply with new city requirements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28- 2004) 11-5-2: SUBDIVISION SECURITIES: In lieu of construction in section 11-5-1 of this chapter, the subdivider shall post with the city of Yorkville, a construction guarantee in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit or irrevocable bond, payable to the United City Of Yorkville, sufficient to cover the full cost, plus ten percent (10%), of the required improvements, as estimated by the engineer employed by the subdivider and approved by the city engineer, to assure the satisfactory installation of required improvements as outlined in this section, and contained in the approved plans and specifications. A surety or bank recognized by the state of Illinois, and approved by the city attorney, shall issue the bond or letter of credit posted, and shall carry a rating sufficient to cover the cost of construction. The subdivider shall use the standard bond form or letter of credit form used by the city of Yorkville. Construction guarantee shall not be reduced to below fifteen percent (15%) of the approved engineer's estimate prior to acceptance of the public improvements by the city. The construction guarantee shall not expire for at least one http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 27 of 40 year. Subsequent renewals of the construction guarantee shall also be for a period of at least one year. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-3: CONSTRUCTION WARRANTY: A. The subdivision irrevocable bond or letter of credit shall be released after an appropriate city council action accepting the improvements for public ownership. Except as provided in subsection B of this section, this subdivision letter of credit will not be released until a one year maintenance bond or letter of credit is posted with the city clerk for ten percent (10%) of the land improvement cost, to ensure that any and all improvements will properly function as designed, with no defects before the city council formal acceptance. B. A maintenance guarantee shall be required for all landscaping but shall not be required for improvements that are on private property that do not serve, benefit, or impact properties other than the one being developed. (Ord. 2011-03, 1-11-2011) 11-5-4: PROCEDURE: A. Not more than ten (10) months after preliminary plan approval, four (4) copies of the proposed final plans and specifications, engineer's estimates prepared and sealed by a professional engineer currently registered with the state of Illinois, and subdivision bond or letter of credit, shall be filed with the city engineer, and shall provide all necessary information for the following, as applicable: 1. Streets; 2. Curbs and gutter; http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 28 of 40 3. Storm drainage, including storm sewers and storm water detention, building storm drains (footings, roof, etc.); 4. Comprehensive drainage plan, including grades of surface drainageways; 5. Sanitary sewerage system; 6. Water supply and distribution; 7. Public utility locations; 8. Streetlights; 9. Sidewalks; 10. Street signs, guardrails, and other special requirements; 11. Parkway trees; and 12. Payment in full of all city fees. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-5: CONSTRUCTION AND INSPECTION: A. Written notice to proceed shall be obtained from the city engineer prior to beginning any work covered by the approved plans and specifications for the above improvements. Authorization to begin work will be given upon receipt of all necessary permits, including all culvert permits required when proposed new or changed subdivision roads intersect any presently existing road, and work must proceed in accordance with construction methods of this section through section 11-5-16 of this chapter, and the city's standard specifications for improvements. B. Construction of all improvements required by this title must be completed within two (2) years from the date of approval of the final plat, unless good cause can be shown for granting an extension of time. C. The subdivider shall pay all expenses incurred by the city of Yorkville to provide field inspections and testing of all construction work and materials before, during, and after construction. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 29 of 40 D. On street parking during build out of the development shall be limited to one side only of all streets. In general, parking will not be allowed on the side of the street where fire hydrants are located. The developer shall post signage, as required by the Yorkville police department. E. Dumpsters, work trailers, and construction materials shall not be stored or located in roadways or public rights of ways at any time, without exception. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28- 2004) 11-5-6: AS BUILT PLANS: After completion of all public improvements, and prior to final acceptance of said improvements, the subdivider shall make, or cause to be made, a map showing the actual location of all valves, manholes, stubs, sewer and water mains, and such other facilities as the director of public works shall require. This map shall bear the signature and seal of an Illinois registered professional engineer. The presentation of this map shall be a condition of final acceptance of the improvements, and release of the subdivision bond or letter of credit assuring their completion. The coordinate system for as built drawings shall be NAD27 Illinois state planes, east zone, U.S. foot (IL-E). The "as built" plans shall be submitted on reproducible Mylar, and also on computer diskette in a format acceptable to the city. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-7: SURVEY MONUMENTS: Permanent and any other monuments required in this title shall be installed prior to the approval of the final plat. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 30 of 40 11-5-8: ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATION, IMPROVEMENTS: A. Final acceptance of the dedication of open space or other public areas shall mean the responsibility for the maintenance of the same. Approval of the final plat does not constitute final acceptance. B. Approval of the final plat shall be dependent on presentation of proof of responsibility for the maintenance of all community improvements. C. All public improvements shall be accepted only by resolution of the city council, after a formal petition for approval has been submitted by the subdivider to the city clerk. Such petition shall be filed after completion of the public improvements. The city engineer and the director of public works shall, within thirty (30) days from receipt of such petition, make recommendations in report form to the city council. All petitions shall be acted upon by the city council within thirty (30) days from receipt of such recommendations of the city engineer and director of public works. A maintenance bond will then be required in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the cost of the land improvements, as specified in this title, after city council acceptance. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-9: STREETS: Street improvements shall be installed by the developer, shall be in accordance with the table of minimum standards herein, and in accordance with the city's standard specifications for improvements. Rights of way at intersections shall have a twenty five foot (25') radius or chord where right of way lines intersect. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 31 of 40 11-5-10: SIDEWALKS: Concrete sidewalks shall be installed by the developer within all subdivisions, on both sides of the street or roadway, to a minimum width of five feet (6), as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-11 : STREET LIGHTING: A complete, functioning streetlight system shall be installed by the developer, at his expense, in all subdivisions as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-12: SIGNAGE, GUARDRAILS, AND LANDSCAPING: A. Street signs of the quantity and type approved by the director of public works shall be installed at each intersection, and shall indicate the street names as shown on the final plat. The city shall order and install the street name signs. The subdivider shall reimburse the city for said cost. The subdivider shall also supply and install regulatory and warning signs, as directed by the Yorkville police department. B. Steel plate beam guardrails shall be placed along the shoulder of any street where street construction has resulted in an embankment greater than six feet (6) in height. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 32 of 40 C. All areas of street right of way that are not paved shall be seeded or sodded. Provisions shall be made to assure the growth of all landscaping. D. All improvements herein shall be as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-13: STORM WATER DRAINAGE: A. Surface water drainage improvements consisting of storm sewers and/or open channels, inlets, catch basins, manholes, and/or detention facilities, shall be designed and constructed to adequately drain the area being developed, and also all of such other areas that naturally drain through the area being developed. B. If the surface water drainage will be changed by the construction of the subdivision, adequate provision shall be made for collection and diversion of such surface waters into public areas, or drains which the subdivider has a right to use, and such surface waters shall not be deposited on the property of adjoining landowners, in such a manner as to cause erosion or other damage. C. Designed planning of surface water drainage facilities shall be performed by, or under the supervision of, a professional engineer, registered in the state of Illinois. The storm water drainage system shall be as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. D. It will be the homeowner's responsibility to maintain any drainage course across his property, and to keep it free from features that restrict natural drainage. (Ord. 2004-52, 9- 28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 33 of 40 11-5-14: SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM: All subdivisions and units therein shall be required to provide connection to the sanitary sewer system, including required sewer extensions off site, to the sizes and depths as required by the city. The sanitary sewers shall be extended to the far boundaries of the development, as directed by the city. All costs of these improvements will be borne by the developer. The sanitary sewer system shall be as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-15: WATER SYSTEM: All subdivisions and units therein shall be required to provide connection to the united city of Yorkville's public water supply system, including required water main extensions off site, to the sizes required by the city, and all costs shall be borne by the developer. All developments must provide a looped, double fed water system, and extensions to the boundaries of the development, as directed by the city, shall also be included in the water system, to be funded by the developer. The water system shall be as specified in the city's standard specifications for improvements. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-5-16: OVERSIZING OF UTILITIES: A. When, in any subdivision, now within the city, or within one and one-half (111/2) miles of the city limits, which normally would require a certain size water main, sanitary sewer, and/or storm sewer, but which for the purpose of complying with the plan of development of the http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 34 of 40 city's comprehensive plan, to provide adequate utilities, not only to the particular subdivision, but also to subdivisions which in the future may become a part of the city, and where the city engineer and the director of public works have determined that water and/or sewer mains of a larger diameter are required, then the city engineer or the director of public works shall inform the subdivider, builders, and developers of the subdivision by a written notice of that fact, and require them to install such oversized utilities and at the same time, in said notice, inform them of the size(s) to be installed. B. Water main shall be considered oversized if it is larger than the size needed to supply the required fire flows of the development, not the minimum pipe size allowed by ordinance. The required fire flow rate for all residential areas shall be one thousand five hundred (1,500) gpm. The required fire flow rate for commercial and industrial areas shall be three thousand two hundred fifty (3,250) gpm. The required fire flow rate within five hundred feet (500') of a school site shall be three thousand three hundred seventy five (3,375) gpm. C. Upon being so notified as provided for in this section, no subdivider, builder, or developer shall install any utility in such subdivision of any size other than that specified to him by the aforesaid notice. D. At such time as the installation of said oversized utilities shall have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to the city of such installation, and also in accordance with the notice specified in this section, and all such installations shall have been inspected and approved by the city as provided for by the ordinances of the city of Yorkville, then the city may enter into an agreement to allow the developer to recover the difference of the cost at current prices, as of the time of said installation, between the development's required utilities which were originally planned to be used, and the cost of the oversized utilities which the city directed to be used. Said agreement may be in the form of a recapture agreement, cash payment(s), rebates of fees to the developer, or some other consideration as may be approved by the city council. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) Chapter 6 ADMINISTRATION http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 35 of 40 11-6-1 : BUILDING PERMIT: No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any building, structure, or improvement to the land, or any lot within a "subdivision" as defined herein, which has been approved for platting or replatting, until all requirements of this title have been fully complied with. In no case will a building permit be issued until all fees have been paid, a grading plan approved, an "all weather" road in place to serve this property, along with functioning drainage facilities, water system, and sanitary sewer system. Exceptions may be made for model home units. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-6-2: CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: A certificate of occupancy may be issued for the use of any structure within a subdivision approved for platting or replatting provided that all required utilities have been installed and are capable of servicing the subdivision, all roadways have the bituminous binder laid, and mutual agreement between the city engineer and the building code official has transpired. The final grading plan must be submitted and approved prior to a certificate of occupancy. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-6-3: VARIATIONS: A. Where the zoning board of appeals finds that extraordinary hardships or particular difficulties may result from the strict compliance with this title, the zoning board of appeals is hereby empowered to consider such matters after receiving written application http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 36 of 40 from the subdivider. If applicable, the zoning board of appeals may recommend, in writing, to the city council, variations or exceptions to the regulations, subject to specified conditions, so that substantial justice may be done and the public interest secured, provided that such variations or exceptions shall not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this title or the comprehensive plan. B. The standards and requirements of this title may be modified in the case of large scale developments when the zoning board of appeals finds that a plan and program for a new village, complete community, shopping center, industrial park, or neighborhood unit provides adequate public open spaces and improvements forcirculation, recreation, and service needs of the tract when fully developed, and which also provides such covenants or other legal provisions to assure conformity and achievement of the plan. C. The zoning board of appeals shall not recommend variations or exceptions to the regulations of this title unless it shall make findings based upon the evidence presented in each specific case, that: 1. Due to the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topography conditions of the specific property involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations was carried out. 2. The conditions upon which the request for a variation is based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not applicable, generally to other properties within the same zoning classification. 3. The alleged hardship was not created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public safety, health, welfare, or interest to other properties or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. D. Variation requests that affect surrounding properties under the circumstances below shall not be approved: 1. Impairment of an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent properties; 2. Substantial increase in the traffic congestion in public streets; 3. Increase the danger of fire; 4. Endanger the public safety; 5. Significantly diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood; or http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 37 of 40 6. Noncompliance with the spirit of intent of the restrictions imposed by the zoning ordinance. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) Chapter 7 AMENDMENTS 11-7-1 : INITIATION OF AMENDMENT: The mayor and city council, the plan commission, the zoning board of appeals, or any resident of the city of Yorkville, or any person residing within one and one-half (11/2) miles of the corporate limits of the city, may propose amendments. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-7-2: PROCESSING APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT: A. Filed With Clerk: An application for an amendment shall be filed with the city clerk. The application shall be accompanied by such plans or data, and such other information, as specified by the plan commission, and shall include a statement, in writing, by the applicant and adequate evidence showing that the proposed amendments will conform to the standards set forth herein. Copies of such application shall be forwarded by the city council to the plan commission with the request to hold a public hearing. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 38 of 40 B. Publication: The city clerk shall cause a notice of time, place, and purpose of such hearing to be published in a newspaper published within the city of Yorkville, not more than thirty (30) days nor less than fifteen (15) days in advance of such hearing. C. Hearing On Application: Upon receipt in proper form of the application and statement referred to above, the plan commission shall hold at least one public hearing on the proposed amendment. However, the plan commission may continue from time to time the hearing without further notice being published. D. Findings Of Fact And Recommendation Of The Plan Commission: Within forty five (45) days after the close of the hearing on a proposed amendment, the plan commission shall make written findings of fact, and shall submit same, together with its recommendations to the mayor and city council. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-7-3: DECISIONS: A. The mayor and city council, upon receiving the recommendation of the plan commission, may grant or deny any proposed amendment in accordance with applicable Illinois statutes, or may refer tothe plan commission for further consideration. B. If a recommendation submitted by the plan commission to the city council for a proposed amendment is not acted upon by the city council within forty five (45) days of the date upon which such application is received by the mayor and city council, it shall be deemed to have been approved. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 39 of 40 Chapter 8 FEE SCHEDULE 11-8-1: LAND CASH CONTRIBUTIONS: Subdividers shall comply with any school and/or park land cash ordinance in effect at the time of final plat approval. The city may require that all or part of the park cash contribution be paid prior to recording any final plat of subdivision of a development. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28- 2004) 11-8-2: FEES: Before the plan commission approves the final plat, the subdivider shall pay to the united city of Yorkville, all fees, reimbursements, and/or deposits due at that time for any of the subdivider's developments in the city. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28-2004) 11-8-3: COORDINATION FEE: A. A coordination fee will be assessed for all new subdivisions, platting or replatting of existing subdivisions or where engineering review is necessary by city ordinance, statute, or ordinance when the review is completed by an outside engineering consultant. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 40 of 40 B. The coordination fee will be charged from the time of initial contact to the time of final plat and plan approval, and will cover all normal city expenses. C. The coordination fee will be charged at the rate of 0.35 percent of the approved engineer's estimate of cost of all land improvements, as defined in the Yorkville subdivision control ordinance, and will be due prior to the recording of the final plat of subdivision. (Ord. 2006-11, 2-28-2006) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/11/2012 Exhibit 1 RESOLUTION FOR THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR EVOROVEMENTS Resolution No.,� 3 These Standards apply to all infrastructure improvements, and may be modified as needed upon the advice of the City 9ngineer for special identified situations or conditions. All contractors shall kiive the City Engineer's office a minimum 48-hour notice of all work and of all required approvals. Failure to obtain these required approvals will require extensive testing,removal and replacement, and a ban for a minimum of one year, from working on the City's right-of-way. Subdividers that have been unfaithful in previous City agreements or developments, or who owe the City payments, will not be allowed to have work performed for them within the public right-of-way. Resident engineering inspection shall be provided through the City Engineer's office, and all such costs shall be charged to the developer by the United City of Yorkville. Required written approvals will not be given until outstanding bills are paid in full. The developer's improvement Letter of Credit or other subdivision securities will also be liable for all such costs. The developer shall be responsible for layout and staking engineering;as well as for record drawings by a registered Professional Engineer. These Specifications for Improvements shall become a part of each and every project approved by the United City of Yorkville, and no other specifications will take precedence. All improvements included in the United City of Yorkville's Standard Specifications for Improvements, unless noted herein, shall conform to the latest editions of the State of Illinois"Standard Specifications for Road and bridge Construction", the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices", and all amendments thereto. These documents shall be considered as included within the City of Yorkville Standard Specifications for Improvements, and in the case of a conflict of requirements, the most stringent shall apply. Prior to starting construction of any project,the developer shall attend a pre-construction meeting and bring a representative from each contractor, a list of all contact persons that can be reached at any time, and a complete schedule of all work to be performed. No work is to start until the City Engineer and the City Administrator have approved the engineering plans, and the pre-construction meeting has been held. The City Engineer must approve any changes to the approved plans in writing. The City Engineer or a representative will,upon discovery of improper material or installation practices, issue a written document to the contractor, stating that failure to stop and correct such deficiencies will-result in the City's refusal to accept such improvements or to issue any further building permits,or to perform required inspections. The subdivider shall obtain and keep in force insurance coverage for Worker's Compensation, and Employer's Liability, Commercial General Liability, Commercial Automobile Liability, and Umbrella Liability,as described in IDOT's "Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction". The United City of Yorkville shall be named as an additional insured_ The insurance coverage shall remain in effect until the City accepts the entire development. The City will not consider acceptance of the public improvements in a development until it is at least fifty (50)percent built out,or three years after the roadway binder course is paved,whichever is sooner. Blasting will not be allowed September 27,2004 Standard Spmifications for Impmvcmmts ROADS All roadways shall conform to the Illinois Department of Transportation (hereinafter termed IDOT) "Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction", unless modified herein.. Horizontal and vertical geometric for right-of-ways and roadways shall conform to the City Standards,listed in Figure 2. Surface course must not be placed until at least severity- (70%) percent of the adjacent, private improvements are in place. However, in no case shall the surface course be placed until the binder course has been in place for at least one full winter season. In no case shall the surface course be delayed more than three(3)years after the binder course has been installed. The subgrade shall be graded and compacted to a hard,uniform surface,matching the slopes of the surface course. It shall have no rutting and shall completely drain to the outer edges. It shall be proof rolled by the contractor with a fully loaded(gravel) 10-cubic yard dump truck and witnessed by and approved in writing by the City Engineer's representative (hereafter termed City Engineer) before proceeding to build the roadway. All unsuitable subgrade shall be removed and replaced with compacted, stable clay material or shall be replaced with compacted CA6 limestone on an approved, non-woven roadway fabric (6.5 oz. minimum). Other geo-grids may be required for certain conditions. All bituminous mixtures shall be delivered and handled so that the bituminous mixture immediately behind the paver screen is at or above 270 degrees F. All asphalt delivered to the project shall be covered when the temperature is at or below 70 degrees F. All subgrades, other than approved granular subgrades, shall be completely covered with a subgrade fabric (Amoco 4551 or approved equal), with a full 18 inches of overlap. Subgrade Fabric shall also be used on lime-stabilized sub grades. It shall be placed neat and tight, without wrinkles, tears, or defects. Construction equipment shall not be allowed to drive on the fabric until it has a minimum of four inches cover of granular base material. The City Engineer shall approve in writing the subgrade fabric installation prior to placing base material. The subgrade fabric shall extend a minimum of twelve inches beyond the back of each curb. In areas where undercutting of the subgrade is required, the bottom of the excavation shall be lined with a woven geotextile(Amoco 2002 or approved equal),and backfilled with CA-3 aggregate. The aggregate base course shall be compacted to a minimum of 45%Modified Proctor and shall be free of all dirt and debris. The course shall be proof rolled,as described above, and witnessed by and approved in writing by the City Engineer before proceeding to build the roadway. A bituminous prime coat shall be applied to the aggregate base course prior to paving. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be placed only upon the written approval of the City Engineer. All asphalt must be laid utilizing a good-quality, properly-functioning, tracked or wheeled asphalt laying machine, utilizing fully-automatic, electronic sensing control from a stringline for the initial course, and from a minimum fifteen(15') foot ski for all other lifts. The bituminous binder course shall be proof rolled as described above, and witnessed by, and approved in writing, by the City Engineer before proceeding with the surface course. All repairs must be made as directed by the City Engineer. All bituminous pavement patches shall be at least fifty(50%)percent thicker than the pavement being patched. Also,the binder course shall be bump tested by the contractor, and witnessed by the City Engineer, and all areas exceeding one-half inch (1/2'1 bumps, including header joints and any patch joints, shall receive a leveling course prior to surfacing. Areas of excessive patching will automatically receive a level course prior to surfacing. Prior to any leveling course or surface course,the streets shall be flushed clean and free of all dirt and debris. A bituminous tack coat will be required. Minimum temperature requirements for laying asphalt will be 5 degrees F higher than that allowed by IDOT specifications. S-2 Standard Specifications for improvements The bituminous concrete surface course shall be placed only upon the written approval of the City Engineer. All asphalt must be laid utilizing good-quality,properly functioning,tracked or wheeled asphalt laying machine, utilizing fully automatic, electronic sensing control from a minimum 15-foot ski. The surface course shall be bump tested by the contractor, and witnessed by the City Engineer_ All bump test penalties specified by IDOT specifications shall be quadrupled,and areas that have an excessive amount of one�half inch(1/2")bumps shall be completely removed and replaced, not just the bump itself Minimum temperature requirements for laying bituminous surface course will be five (5) degrees E higher than that allowed by IDOT specifications. The surface elevation of the asphalt at the concrete gutter shall be 1/ inch higher than that of the adjacent concrete. All streets shall have a cross slope of 2% from the centerline to the concrete curb. Areas of segregated binder course and/or surface course shall be removed and replaced at the direction of the City Engineer. Segregated asphalt is the uneven distribution of course and fine materials in the asphalt characterized by pavement textures different from the surrounding material, and can usually be seen by the naked eye. Pavements constructed from Portland Cement Concrete shall be designed in conformance with American. Concrete Pavement Association Publications IS 184P and IS 061P,as amended. Combination concrete curb and gutter will be required on all roadways. All curb and gutter shall be placed on an aggregate base with a minimum thickness of four inches, but in no case shall the curb and gutter subgrade be higher than one inch below the adjacent roadway subgrade. The height of the gutter flag shall be ten (10") inches, unless directed otherwise by the City Engineer. As noted previously, the roadway subgrade fabric will extend over the curb and gutter subgrade, and beyond by a minrrnum of twelve (12") inches. The concrete curb and gutter shall be reinforced with two #4 deformed bars, placed three (3") inches from the bottom,spaced twelve(12")inches apart,centered on the total width of the curb and gutter. Machine-planed concrete curb and gutter is to be utilized wherever practical., utilizing a minimum Class X concrete, and a five (5%) percent minimum air-entrainment, Plastizers will be allowed, but chlorides will not An approved spray-on curing compound with red fugitive coloring shall be applied immediately after finishing, and a sealer, WR Meadows TIAC, or approved equal, shall be applied after seven. days. The resident engineer shall be notified of these applications, and proof of purchase,with material specifications, will be required. The concrete curb and gutter shall have the required slip bar expansion joints,and 1% inch deep sawed contraction joints will be required every 15-20 feet, within 24 hours after each pour. Minor honeycombing on the two outer,vertical surfaces will be allowed,but they must be patched in an approved manner,and witnessed by the City Engineer,prior to backfilling. The clay backfill behind the curb shall be placed and compacted prior to placing aggregate base course. Roadway extensions and stubs will be required as part of the development, with full improvements where needed, for future gro*th Additional lanes, access improvements, traffic signalization, etc., may be required., at the developer's expense. The developer shall reimburse the City for two of each street name and regulatory signs and posts required, and the City will install them. All signs shall be high-intensity, as approved by the Director of Public Works. All pavement markings shall be thermoplastic. The developer shall reimburse the City for the cost of replacing any signs that are missing, stolen, or damaged prior to final acceptance. The developer, to comply with these Standard Specifications for Improvements, shall improve existing roadways running through,or adjacent to,the development. S-3 Standard Specifications for Improvements Half-streets are discouraged, but where they are necessary, on advice of the City Engineer, the minimum width street will be twenty-four (24') feet from the edge of pavement to the back of curb, on the development side of the roadway. Street lighting, sidewalk, and landscaping on the development side will be required. Temporary tee turn-arounds will be required on all streets stubbed for future roadway extension, as recommended by the City Engineer, and shown on the Final Plat. Paving for the tee will extend from right-of-way line to right-of-way line, to a length of fifteen(15') feet, and two radii of fifteen (151) feet The pavement beyond the road edge shall be three (3") inches of bituminous concrete surface course, on a ten- (10") inch CA6 aggregate-compacted base, with pavement fabric. Concrete curb and gutter will not be required around the tee, and sidewalk will not required through the tee. The developer extending the street in the future shall remove the excess paving and base, place topsoil, and seed the area disturbed, construct the additional curbing so that the curb and gutter is continuous and uninterrupted from one development to another, and resurface for a distance of thirty (30') feet, including header joints, as approved by the City Engineer. When a development includes construction along State and County highways, or other heavily traveled road, the developer shall post advance-warning signs. The developer shall consult with the Yorkville Police Department concerning the types and locations of signs, and shall obtain a permit from the appropriate jurisdictional agency prior to erecting the signage. The City may require the roadway design to include traffic-calming measures. These measures may include, but not be limited to, curvilinear roadway layout, landscaping beyond the requirements of the Landscape Ordinance,traffic tables,and fog lines. if a development includes the construction or modifications of traffic signals, the new signals shall be designed to have light-emitting diode (LED) lights. The traffic signal shall also have a battery backup device. All new roadways shall be designed in accordance with IDOT Circular 95-11, or the most recently adopted IDOT standard for the design of flexible and full-depth bituminous pavements. The following minimum design criteria shall be used when applying the design method: Design period=20 years Class U Roadway Traffic Factor Equations for 80,000 lb.Vehicles 2.0%traffic growth rate AC viscosity of AC-20 Subgrade Support Rating of Fair Local Residential Roadways Local Residential Roadways are intended to carry an average daily traffic(ADT)volume of less than 1000. The right-of-way width shall be 66 feet. The bituminous concrete surface course shall be a minimum of 1.5 inches in thickness of Class 'T' Superpave mixture. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be a minimum of 2.5 inches in thickness. The aggregate stone base shall be lJ0 inches in thickness of clean, crushed CA-6 gradation gravel or limestone. The roadways shall be bound with B-6.12 combination concrete curb and gutter to a width of thirty feet from back of curb to back of curb (B-B). The street radius for all intersecting streets shall be a minimum of thirty feet to the back of curb. The edge of pavement shall be cleaned and sealed with rubberized asphalt cement hot-poured joint sealer. Estate Residential Roadways Estate Residential Roadways are intended to carry an average daily traffic(ADT)volume of less than 1000. The right-of-way width shall be 70 feet The bituminous concrete surface course shall be a minimum of 1.5 inches in thickness of Class "T' Superpave mixture. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be a minimum of 2.5 inches in thickness. The aggregate stone base shall be ten inches in thickness of clean, crushed CA-6 gradation gravel or limestone..The roadway surface shall be 28 feet wide with two 12.5-foot wide through-lanes. The lane edges shall be striped with a four-inch thermoplastic pavement marking. The roadway up to and including the aggregate stone base shall be 32 feet wide to provide a 2-foot wide aggregate shoulder (nominal thickness of at least 12 inches), and also to allow for future widening. Mailbox turnouts will be paved,using driveway specifications to determine thickness. S-4 Standard Specifications far lmprovrmmts Minor Collector Roadways Minor Collector Roadways are intended to carry 1000-2500 ADT. The right-of-way width shall be 70 feet. The bituminous concrete surface course shall be a minimum of 1.5 inches in thickness of Class "I" Superpave mixture. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be a minimum of 4.5 inches in thickness. The aggregate stone base shall be 12 inches in thickness of clean, crushed CA-6 gradation gravel or limestone. The roadways shall be bound with B-6.12 combination concrete curb and gutter to a width of 34 feet B-B. The street radius for all intersecting streets shall be a minimum of thirty feet to the back of curb. Minor collector roadways may provide direct access to adjacent private lots. The edge of pavement shall be cleaned and sealed with rubberized asphalt cement hot-poured joint sealer. Collector Roadwa s and Commercial/Industrial Roadways Collector Roadways are intended to carry 2500-12,000 ADT. The right-of-way width shall be 80 feet These design standards shall also apply to all roadways directly serving commercial or industrial zoned areas. The bituminous concrete surface course shall be a minimum of 1.5 inches in thickness of Class "I" Superpave mixture. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be a minimum of 4.5 inches in thickness. The aggregate stone base shall be 12 inches in thickness of clean, crushed CA-6 gradation gravel or limestone. The roadways shall be bound with B-6.12 combination concrete curb and gutter to a width of 39 feet B-B. The street radius for all intersecting streets shall be a minimum of 40 feet to the back of curb. Collector roadways shall not provide direct access to adjacent lots in residential-zoned areas. The edge of pavement shall be cleaned and sealed with rubberized asphalt cement hot-poured joint sealer. Manor Collector Roadways Major Collector Roadways are intended to carry more than 12,000 ADT. The right-of-way width shall be 100 feet The bituminous concrete surface course shall be a minimum of 1.5 inches in thickness of Class "I" Superpave mixture. The bituminous concrete binder course shall be a minimum of six inches in thickness (2 lifts required). The aggregate stone base shall be 16 inches in thickness of clean,crushed CA- 6 gradation gravel or limestone. The roadways shall be bound with B-7.18 combination concrete curb and gutter to a width of 51 feet(four 12-foot lanes)B-B. The City Engineer may require an additional 12-foot center turn lane, as deemed appropriate. The street radius for all intersecting streets shall be a minimum of 50 feet to the back of curb. The edge of pavement shall be cleaned and sealed with rubberized asphalt cement hot-poured joint sealer. An alternative bituminous base course may be approved by the City Engineer, and B6-18 or B6-24 combination concrete curb and gutter may be required,based upon specific site drainage needs. r Boulevards Boulevard-style roadways shall have a minimum width of 28 feet B-B for approaches to intersections. The minimum pavement width in other areas shall be 20 feet B B. SIDEWALK Non-reinforced, concrete sidewalks will be required on both sides of all roadways. They shall be a minimum of four (4') feet wide where four (4') feet wide walks now exist, and five (5') felt wide in all other locations. All sidewalks shall be five (5") inches in thickness. They will be a minimum of six (6") inches in thickness across driveway approaches. All sidewalks shall have an aggregate base of CA 7,with a minimum thickness of two inches (five inches across driveway approaches). All concrete shall be Class X,with a minimum of five(5 0/6)percent air-entrainments. Sidewalks shall slope two (2%)percent towards the street Approved curing and sealing compounds are required,as specified previously for concrete curb and gutter. The back of the sidewalk shall be placed twelve(12')inches from the right-of-way line,unless directed otherwise. The sidewalk shall have a light broom finish. Formed contraction joints are required, at a spacing of five(5') feet. Expansion joint material, one-half inch in thickness, and full-depth, shall be placed every 100 feet The subgrade for the sidewalk shall be uniform,neat, and compacted to a minimum 90%modified proctor. S-5 Standard Specifications for Improvements Spalling or chips will not be allowed to be patched. All such areas will be removed from contraction joint to contraction joint, and replaced. All sidewalks will be in place prior to acceptance of the public improvements by the City, which includes in front of vacant lots. These areas must be protected during future construction. No sidewalks are required in Estate-residential subdivisions. However, in the event sidewalks are not provided, a paved trail that abuts every lot must be provided, that meets the City's standards, specifically a ten (10') foot width, with an exit and entrance identification, consisting of two (2") inches of asphalt on eight(8") inches of CA6 aggregate. Dedicated easements at least fifteen (15') feet wide must be provided for the trail. DRIVE APPROACHES Drive approaches must be constructed to one of the following: 1. Six inches, minimum of Class X concrete„ with a minimum of five (5%) percent air-entrainment, over six inches minimum CA6 aggregate base over a 90%modified proctor compacted subgrade, with curing and sealing treatments, as specified above,under concrete curb and gutter. Expansion joint material, one-half (1/2'1 thick and full-depth, shall be installed at the curb and at the sidewalk. 2. Two inches, minimum of Class I bituminous concrete surface course, over a minimum base of eight (8") inches of CA6 aggregate over a 90% modified proctor compacted subgrade. The concrete sidewalk will be constructed through the drive approach,and any construction damage to the concrete sidewalk or curb will cause removal and replacement of those improvements. Drive approaches will not be constructed steeper than eight(8 0/c)percent_ 3. In Estate-residential subdivisions, all driveways must be paved with brick, asphalts or concrete, and must have a concrete culvert with flared end sections. Culvert diameter shall be twelve (12") inches or greater,as required by the City. PARKWAYS AND PARK SITES All parkways, park sites, and other open spaces shall be landscaped and designed in accordance with the City of Yorkville's Landscape Ordinance and the Park Development Standards, as amended from time to time. Any existing trees within a development deemed by the Parks Department and Public Works Department to be dead, dying, or of an undesirable species shall be removed by the developer. The developer shall not remove or cut down any trees without the prior consent of the Parks Department and Public Works Department,or as indicated in the approved landscape plan. STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM All streets shall have a complete street lighting system designed by a professional engineer. A street light will be required at all intersections, all curves,at all ends of cul-de-sacs, and at a maximum spacing of 300 feet. In Estate-residential subdivisions, street lights shall be required at intersections, and at a maximum spacing of 500 feet,with lights also placed at curves and a he.end of dead-end streets. The poles shall be concrete with butt-type foundations. The City Engineer may require a streetlight to be placed at other points, as may be necessary in the public interest in unusual or special conditions. They shall be located at side lot lines, and on the opposite side of the street from the water main.,wherever possible,and shall be set two feet from back of curb to face of pole. Occupancy permits cannot be issued until all streetlights in that phase of the development are installed,complete,and operational. S-b Standard Spe6f=tims for Improvements All exterior lighting of private property in new developments shall be designed, located, and mounted at heights no greater than twenty(20')feet above grade for non-cutoff lights,and forty-(40') feet above grade for cutoff lights. The lighting plan, photometrics, and shop drawings for lighting equipment shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Glare shall be minimized to the extent practical by orienting lights away from the public right-of-way and abutting properties, or by planting vegetation to provide screening. Exterior lighting shall be designed, located, and mounted so that the maximum illumination measured horizontally at the lot line does not exceed one(1') foot-candle. Light Distribution: Luminaries of the Type II distribution as approved by the Illuminating Engineering Society (herein termed IES) shall be used, except at intersections where Type II or Type IV IES distribution shall be used. The City Engineer may designate the IES Type V distribution h mi*±ar es be used in the public interest under unusual or special conditions. Individual Control: On individual control of lights,the photoelectric control shall be mounted on top of the luminare. Line Drop: Voltage drop shall be no greater than three (3 0/c.) percent from power supply to the last pole, with no wire size smaller than No. Six (6) Type RHIH or RHW Underground Service Cable (USC). All streetlights shall operate at I20 volts,except for those on major streets. Power Supply Location: Connection to the power supply shall be made to comply with Commonwealth Edison Company rules and regulations,as amended fro time to tame. Conduit: All driveways, street, and sidewalk crossovers shall have two (2") inches of HD PVC conduit, used as raceways for underground cable. Underground Cable: All underground cable shall be direct buried cable,placed at a depth at least thirty- (30") inches below the normal finished grade. Three cables (Black, White, Green) shall be run from the pole to the power supply. Any underground cable broken more than once prior to Final Acceptance shall be replaced from the power source to the pole or from pole to pole. S Ip ices: All cable on the underground cable section shall be continuous, and no splicing shalll be made underground. All necessary splices shall be made above ground level. Underground Cable Location: Underground cable shall be installed in a trench not less than two feet from the back of the curb, except that in no case shall the underground cable be installed under the sidewalk. Grounding: A copper-clad ground rod shall be placed at each pole. The rod shall be mirfmum 5l8-inch diameter,and ten(10') feet long. Fusing: All underground feeders shall be fused at or below their rated capacity. Each standard shall contain in-line fuse holders, with proper fusing in series with each underground conductor to protect the luminare located on that pole. Maintenance Prior to Acce tance: Once streetlights are operational, the Yorkville Public Works Department shall perform normal maintenance, even though the Yorkville City Council has not accepted the streetlight system. Normal maintenance consists of investigating the cause of an outage, and repairing it if the cause is a burned out lamp, fuse, or photocell. All other repairs shall be referred to the developer. The cost of performing normal maintenance prior to acceptance by the Yorkville City Council shall be paid from a"Streetlight Normal Maintenance' deposit established by the developer prior to recording the Final Plat The deposit shall be$300.00 per pole, or other such amount, as may be determined by the Yorkville City Council, from time to time. If the deposit proves insufficient,the developer shall replenish the deposit within thirty- (30) days of written request by the City Engineer. The Yorkville City Council shall return any unused funds to the developer upon acceptance of the streetlight system- S-7 Standard Specifications for Improvements Streetlight Standard and Bracket: Local streets shall use 906 B 19-AD4, American Concrete Company pole and bracket, or approved equal. Luminare shall be mounted 19'9" above the street, shall have a four- (4')foot arm. The pole shall be buried a minimum of five(5')feet below grade and backfilled with crushed CA6 limestone, watered, and compacted around the butt of the pole. The bracket is to be furnished with the pole. The luminare shall be a General Electric Company No.M2RR15S1N2AMS3F, or approved equal with the 1-114"side mount built-in ballast. The luminaries shall be fitted with General Electric Company"Lucalox" high-pressure sodium lamps LU 150/551D, or approved equal, with GE Company ANSI specification "S55" high-pressure sodium ballasts (or approved equal) or American Electric 115 15-S-RN-120-R2-DA- 4B. Maior Collector Streets: The lighting pole shall be Stress Crete E340-BPO-G, with Style 210 low rise tapered aluminum davit, or approved equals. The davit outreach length shall be eight (8') feet The Iuminare shall be mounted thirty- (30') feet above the street. The pole shall have an embedment depth of five(5')feet, and be backfilled with CA 6 limestone. The streetlight system shall be operated through controller(s) in ground-mounted cabinets. The controller and luminare shall operate at 240 volts. The controller shall be housed in a pad-mounted Type NEMA 3R enclosure. The exterior of the cabinet shall have a bronze tone powder-coat finish. The approximate dimensions of the cabinet shall be 42"H x 36"W x 12"D. A Com Ed meter socket shall be provided on the exterior of the cabinet. The manufacturer or distributor shall guarantee streetlight standards, luminaries,ballast, lamps, and cables for their proper use,for one year,from the date of acceptance. Testing: The subdivider shall manually trigger the photocell in order to have each street light bum continuously for at least 48 hours. During this burn test, amperage readings shall be taken, and must be within ten(10%)percent of the connected load,based on equipment ratings. Parking Lot Lighting: Parking lots in areas zoned Business, Residential, or Office-Research, shall be provided with Iighting necessary to achieve a minimum average of 2.0 foot-candles,as measured across the entire parking lot, and a maximum of 1.0 foot-candles,as measured at the adjoining property lines. Parking lots in areas zoned Manufacturing shall have a minimum average lighting intensity of one foot-candles,per square foot. Lighting shall be designed to avoid casting direct light or glare onto adjacent residential property. STORM SEWER SYSTEM A complete storm sewer system shall be required,consisting of closed conduits to an approved storm water storage system. All storm sewers within the public right-of-way and easements parallel to and adjacent to public right-of-way shall be reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), with a twelve (12") inch minimum diameter. Storm sewers in rear yards and side yards may be high-density polyethylene(H.D.P.E.) of a manufacturer and design, to be approved by the City of Yorkville. All roadways will have a system of inlets/catch basins,tied directly to the storm sewer. These storm water collection locations will be on both sides of the street, with a maximum longitudinal flow interval of 300 feet. All such collection points will be an inlet except the last structure before entering a storm sewer main shall be a catch basin with a two-foot sump. Catch basins or open-lid structures shall not be located over the sewer main. All backfill is to be a CA7 aggregate. All storm sewer roadway crossings from structure to structure must be backfilled with CA7 aggregate and completely encapsulated in an approved drainage fabric. In this manner,the curb subgrade, the storm crossings, and the inlets and catch basins create a roadway underdrain system for longer roadway life. The City may require that storm sewers be constructed along the centerline of individual roadways at certain locations. Those locations shall normally be limited to within 100 feet of the lowest sag vertical curve of a roadway. Where these locations occur within a horizontal curve of the roadway, storm manholes shall be placed at the centerline of individual roadways. S-8 Standard Specifications for Improvements If subgrade conditions are excessively sensitive to moisture or other special conditions, a capped, perforated, plastic underdrain may be required under the curb and gutter. All storm water conduits 12" diameter and larger shall be internally televised in color just prior to City acceptance, and shall be free of defects, sags, dirt, and debris. All non-RCP storm sewers shall also be mandrel tested(similar to sanitary sewer testing)just prior to City acceptance.All parking lots shall be drained internally,and directed by pipe to the storm sewer. Storm sewers shall extend to the limits of the development with proper sizing, as approved by the City Engineer,based upon current and future runoff conditions,to pick up and safely carry through the development any and all upstream bypass flows. All new homes with basements or crawl spaces shall have a direct,underground conduit to the storm sewer system. Fill-in lots in areas with no storm sewer within 500 feet shall not be required to have this direct connection. Minimum depth of cover for these lines shall be 30 inches. All discharges shall have an approved automatic diverter calve immediately outside the house and a check valve inside the house. Multiple collection lines of four inch and six inch HD PVC will be allowed by an approved design. Terminal and junction points shall be at two-foot diameter precast concrete inlets with open-lid castings. The pipe from the house shall be a 2" minimum HD PVC with cemented joints. The connection to the storm sewer shall be through a neat, tight fitting,bored hole into the concrete pipe. After insertion of the sump pump discharge pipe into the concrete storm sewer pipe, the joint shall be sealed with hydraulic cement In no case shall the sump pump discharge pipe extend beyond the inner surface of the concrete storm sewer pipe. Connections,however,shall be into a structure wherever practical. Individual storm sewer services shall not be required in areas of the development where soil and ground water conditions indicate that sump pumps would run very infrequently. If the developer does not wish to install storm sewer services, he shall perform soil borings at regular intervals (300' to 400' grid typical) during the Final Plan preparation stage, to determine soil types and ground water elevations. Boring locations are subject to approval by the City. Each boring shall extend at least 20 feet below existing ground elevations and be referenced to the development benchmarks. If the boring logs show granular soil and also show ground water elevations at least five(5') feet below planned basement floor elevations, then individual storm sewer services shall not be required in that area of the development During excavation of every basement in that area, the developer shall verify(with.City representative present) that the granular soil and deep ground water conditions exist If either condition is found not to exist at a building location, the developer shall construct a storm sewer service to that building, in conformance with these Standard Specifications. The design of the storm water collection system shall be for a ten(10) year storm, running lust full. The only exception to this is where the receiving storm water system has less capacity and here the new system of conduits shall be designed for a five(5)year event,running just full. The minimum velocity shall-be 2.5 fps and the maximum shall be 8 fps. The storm sewer pipe shall have a minimum cover of three (3') feet. Stone sewer manholes shall be five(5') feet internal diameter,constructed of reinforced concrete, and shall be placed at a maximum spacing of 500 feet. Storm sewer manholes may be four(4') feet internal diameter when the largest sewer entering/leaving the manhole is 18" diameter, and the orientation of sewers connecting to the manhole is such that there is at least 12" of precast wall between the openings provided for sewers. The use of adjusting rings is limited in height to eight (8") inches. Inlet and/or catch basin frames and grates shall be Neenah No. 3015,East Jordan No. 7010,or approved equal. Whenever possible, castings for curb drains shall have a fish logo to discourage dumping of oils, pesticides, 'and other inappropriate items into the storm sewer system. Where a continuous grade is carried across an inlet or catch basin casting, the open-vaned cover shall be used,Neenah No.R-32868V,East Jordan No.EV-7520,or approved equal. All manhole castings shall be Neenah No. R-1030, East Jordan No. 105123, and Type B cover, or approved equal. All type B covers shall have"City of Yorkville" and "Storm" cast into the top, and shall be concealed pickhole type. All sections of the manholes shall be completely sealed and butyl rope, including the casting. Manholes shall no be allowed in the pavement, curb, gutter, or sidewalk All flared end sections 15" or larger shall have grates. S-9 Standard Specifications for lmprovemmts In Estate residential developments, a ditch shall be required on both sides of the street, and shall have a minimum profile slope of one(1%)percent(side slope 4:1 on the street side,and 3:1 on the lot side). For developments ten acres in size or larger,the developer may use computer-based methods to determine stormwater storage volumes. The specific method and parameters used in employing the method shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. For developments less than ten acres in size, the storm water storage system shall be designed utilizing a Modified Rational Method,as described below: 1. Q = (Cm) iA, where a run-off co-efficient or Ca is calculated for the site based upon actual proposed surface coverage. Cm then.equals 1.25 times Ca_ 2. The following run-off co-efficient shall be utilized as minimums: Surface C Grass .50 Asphalt/Concrete .98 Roof 1.00 Detention 1.00 3. The maximum release at the designated 100-year level is 0.15 cfs/acre. The City Engineer shall reduce this allowable release rate where the downstream accepting system is experiencing drainage problems such as the Elizabeth Street swale where all receiving discharges are limited to 0.10 cfs/acre. The outlet structure design shall address the two-year (0.04 cfs/acre) and the 25-year(0.08 cfs/acre) storm control,in addition to the 100-year event 4. When depressional compensatory storage is provided by increasing the volume of a stormwater detention basin, the maximum allowable release rates of the basin shall be reduced, as directed by the City of Yorkville to approximate the pre-development release of the depressional area,and realize the full storage potential of the enlarged basin. 5. The minimum size restrictor shall be a four-inch by twelve-inch long 14D PVC pipe. The design must be designed for easy maintenance and cleaning during a storm event The discharge shall be directly to a downstream storm sewer if one is available within a reasonable distance. If not, the discharge will be to the surface, with approved energy dissipation and downstream erosion protection. 6. The rainfall intensities to be utilized are those established by the Illinois State Water Survey's Bulletin#70, as amended for the specific City of Yorkville area. In designating the required storm water storage volumes,the maximum value calculated using the various events should be utilized- See Figure 3 for a sample calculation. 7. The storm water storage areas must have containment for twelve inches of additional storm water storage, with an approved calculated overflow area at six inches above calculated 100- year elevation. This overflow shall have an erosion concrete curtain wall, with a minimum thickness of 8 inches, a minimum depth of three feet below grade, and a length to extend a minimum of four feet beyond the limits of the overflow on either end. This wall is not to be formed,but is to be trenched or excavated into natural soil, or into the compacted fill, and is to be finished flush to the ground_ 8. Storm water storage areas shall be covered by an easement,including access thereto,such that should the owner not maintain said area as necessary,the City can cause such corrections and bill the owner,including any and all administrative costs. S-10 Standard Specifications for Improvements 4. The engineering plans shall have a full sheet dedicated to the soil erosion and sedimentation control requirements for the development,including silt fencing,straw bales, drainage fabric, etc. Failure to properly maintain this system may result in major storm sewer cleaning within the site and in the offset storm system. The City reserves the right to place a hold on all building permits and inspections if the soil erosion and sedimentation control plan is not properly maintained. Keeping the streets clean is part of this plan, and failure to do so will result in these actions.The developer shall establish a Street Cleaning deposit with the City of Yorkville, in the amount of$5000.00. if the streets are not cleaned within 48 hours of a written request by the Director of Public Works, the City shall have the streets cleaned, and subtract that cost from the deposit The developer shall replenish the deposit to the full amount if it falls to less than $1000.00. The Yorkville City Council shall return any unused portion of the deposit to the developer upon acceptance of the streets. 10. The developer shall establish basins onsite where concrete ready-mix trucks must wash out after delivering their load. Signs shall be posted at each entrance to the development to warn truck drivers of the requirement to wash out at specific sites, and notify them of the fine for non-compliance (up to $100.00 for each offense). Each entrance sign shall include a simplified map of the development; to show the locations of the washout basins in the development A sign shall also be posted at each washout basin, to identify the site. The developer shall maintain all signs,basins, and appurtenances in good condition until the City accepts the public improvements. Washout basins shall be located outside of the public right-of-way,parks,and all public utility easements. They shall be located in relatively low-traffic areas,and be at least fifty-(50')feet from storm drains, open drainage facilities, and watercourses,unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. Basins shall have a minimum twelve (12") inch thick CA-3 aggregate approach of sufficient width over a woven geotextile fabric, to reduce tracking of mud onto roadways. The washout area shall be contained by an earthen berm, and be at least ten (10') wide by ten(10')long. The maximum depth of a washout basin shall be three feet When the volume of a washout basin is 75%full,the developer shall remove the hardened concrete and transport it to a legal landfill. Burying waste concrete onsite-shall not be permitted.. The developer shall incorporate the items necessary to comply with this requirement, as well as provisions for maintenance,onto the erosion and sediment control plan sheet All signage, washout basins,and appurtenances shall be in place before the first building permit is issued. 11. The engineering plans shall have one or more full sheets dedicated to the Final Grading of the entire site. The minimum grade for all grass areas shall be two (2%) percent, except that swale areas may be at one (1 9/6) percent if it is over an approved, piped underdrain. Slopes shall be shown with arrows at all locations from all break points. A grading plan on an 8-1/2" x 11"paper for the actual building must be submitted for each building permit submitted,and will become a part of the building permit All top of foundation elevations will be a minimum of two (2') feet, and a maximum of three (3') feet above the street centerline elevation, measured at the center of the lot in question,unless the City Engineer directs otherwise,based on site-specific conditions. Drives must be at a minimum slope of two (2 0/6) percent, and maximum slope of eight(8%)percent towards the curb flow line from the garage. When the forms for the foundation are ready to pour, a top of foundation elevation and location certification of a registered surveyor or engineer, as approved by the building inspector, is required prior to pouring the concrete into the forms. The tolerance here is 0.15 feet lower and 0.5 feet higher,and behind all applicable setback and easement lines. S-11 Standard Specifications for Improvements 12. Requests for an occupancy permit must include an as-built grading plan, signed and sealed by a registered land surveyor, showing the original, approved grades and slopes, along with the actual grades,just prior to the occupancy permit request The actual grades must fall within a tolerance of 0.15 feet in order to receive an occupancy permit Top soiling and seeding or sodding,if applicable,must be in place prior to the final grading plan. All City-incurred costs of reviewing these grading plans shall be the responsibility of the developer. Note that specific building codes, ordinances, and permitting procedures, which may be established by the United City of Yorkville,shall supersede these requirements. 13. General grading and landscaping of the storm water areas shall be designated according to the Park Development Standards, Landscape Ordinance, and these Standard Specifications. The City may require that storm water detention and retention facilities, as well as grading, landscaping, and stormwater collection systems, incorporate currently acknowledged Best Management Practices to improve storm water quality. These may include, but are not limited to, naturalized detention basins, bio-swales, low impact design standards, perforated storm sewer, designs that reduce the degree of connected impervious areas, designs that encourage infiltration of stormwater,etc. Wet ponds shall have a maximum allowable depth of two feet between the normal water level and the high water level corresponding to the Ten-Year Frequency Storm. The City may require wetland-type plantings and appropriate grading around the perimeter of wet ponds. The developer shall provide a soil report, prepared by a licensed professional engineer, to determine whether or not lake lining will be required. Vertical or nearly vertical edge treatment will require an approved method,allowing a child to easily climb out of the water. Storm sewers discharging to a stormwater basin shall be designed such that the sewer invert at the discharge point is no lower than 6"below the normal water level.of the basin,and the top of sewer is no lower than the ten-year high water level of the basin. 14. Storm water storage basins shall operate independently of any watercourse or water body receiving the discharge from the basins. Bypass flows from upstream areas should bypass the storm water storage facility, where practical.-'The entire development shall be examined under the premise that all storm sewers are blocked and full when a 100-year event occurs, and the development can pass these flows without flooding homes. All overflows are to be contained within the right-of-way, or where absolutely necessary, through special drainage easements. All buildings shall have the lowest water entry a minimum of 1$ inches above the elevations determined for this bypass situation. 15. Storm water detention shall not be required under the conditions listed below. The City reserves the right to require detention on any parcel of land if special circumstances exist, and to require that sewer be constructed as necessary,to carry away the storm water. a) Proposed development or re-development of the existing lots zoned single- family detached,or duplex residential,less than 2.5 acres in gross area. b) Proposed development or re-development of existing lots zoned other than single-family detached or duplex residential, that are less than 1.25 acres in gross area. 5-12 standard Specifications fox Improvements WATER SYSTEM 1. All water mains shall be Class 52 ductile iron pipe, conforming to the latest specification requirements of ANSI A21.S.1. Mains shall be cement lined, in accordance with. ANSI A21.4. Fittings shall conform to ANSI 21.10_ Gate valves shall be resilient wedge type, conforming to the latest revised requirements of AWWA specification C509. All water mains are to be polyethylene wrapped. Main line valves 10" diameter and larger are to be installed in a vault Smaller main-line valves shall either be installed in a vault, or have a Trench Adapter valve box,similar to those used at fire hydrants. No vaults or valve boxes shall be in the pavement or sidewalk. 2. Water services up to 3" diameter shall be iype "K" copper, conforming to the latest revised specification requirement of ASTM B88. Minimum size for residential units shall be one inch in diameter. Corporation stops shall be McDonald No. 4701, Mueller H-15000, or Ford F- 600. Curb stops shall be McDonald No. 6104, Mueller H-15154, or Ford B22-333m, with Minneapolis patter B-boxes,similar to McDonald N.5614 or Mueller H-10300. 3. Minneapolis type B boxes shall be installed in the right-of-way, but not in the sidewalk or driveway. 4. Fire hydrants shall be one of the following: 1. Clow F-2545 (Medallion) 2. Mueller A423 Super Centurion 3. Waterous WB-67-250 Hydrants shall have a 5-114"main valve assembly,one 4-112"pumper nozzle, and two 2-112" hose nozzles, with national standard threads, a national standard operating nut, and above ground break flange. The installation of the hydrant shall conform to AWWA 600 standards. Auxiliary valve boxes shall either be Trench Adapter Model Six by American Flow Control, Clow F-2546 with F-2493 cover, or approved equal. For valve boxes other than those by American Flow Control, the box shall be attached to the hydrant barrel with grip arms, as manufactured by BLR Enterprises,or approved equal 5. Inspections and Installation: All water mains shall be designed and installed in accordance with the Standard Specifications for Water Mains in Illinois. Upon completion, water mains shall be subjected to hydrostatic pressure test of 150-psi average for up to 4 hours. Allowable recovery shall conform to the Standard Specifications for Water& Sewer Main Construction in Illinois. The water operator in charge or person authorized by the water operator in charge shall be present during all testing. The developer shall use the pressure gauge supplied by the City for the test 6. New water main shall be disinfected in accordance with AWWA standard C601. Water will be tested to assure that 50 mg/1 of CL2 is in disinfected water. Sampling shall be taken by water operator in charge or persons authorized by the water in charge. Water must pass two consecutive days of sampling tests by a state approved lab. 7. Water mains shall be minimum eight inches internal diameter, with a cover of five feet, six inches below finished grade. Watermain stubs to hydrants shall be at least six inches internal diameter. City water mains and hydrants shall be placed of the North and West sides of the streets, unless approved otherwise the City Engineer. Valves shall be installed each second consecutive hydrant, at intersecting lines, and other locations as required, such that a minimum number of services will be affected during a main isolation. S-13 Standard Sp=ificabons for lmpmvemmts Fire hydrants shall be installed throughout the subdivision at each intersection and at intervals not exceeding the requirements of two fire hydrants serving any point of any building, or 300 feet along the roadway, whichever is more stringent. Special conditions may dictate a closer spacing, as approved. Fire hydrants shall be located on the property line, except at corners, and shall be set two feet minimum and three feet maximum from the curb back to the face of the pumper nozzle. Where there is no curb and gutter,the face of the pumper nozzle shall be between 19 inches to 20 inches above finished grade line(sidewalk to curb). Base elbow of hydrant shall. be properly thrust blocked, and shall be provided with clean, washed CA7 aggregate and polyethylene covering. All hydrants and any adjustment fittings shall receive one field coat of red paint: as recommended by the manufacturer, prior to final acceptance. 8. All tees,bends, fire hydrants, and valves shall be adequately blocked with pre-cast blocks and poured in place thrust blocking against undisturbed earth. 9. Services shall be equipped with corporation stop,curb stop, and buffalo box. The buffalo box shall be set in the parkway, on the centerline of the property,approximately centered between the back of sidewalk and the adjacent right-of-way line. Service trenches beneath or within two feet of proposed driveways, sidewalks, or other pavements shall be backfilled full-depth with aggregate. Except as permitted below, the underground water service pipe and the building drain,or building sewer,shall be not less than ten feet apart horizontally,and shall be separated by undisturbed or compacted earth. The water service pipe may be placed in the same trench with the building drain and building sewer if the conditions listed below are met: A. Local conditions prevent a lateral separation of ten feet; B. The bottom of the water service pipe at all points shall be at least 18 inches above the top of the sewer line at its highest point All water and sewer services must be inspected an approved by the building inspector prior to backfilling. C. The water service pipe shall be placed on a solid shelly excavated at one side of the common trench, and shall have no joints from the buffalo box to the water meter inside the house; and D. The material and joints of sewer and water service pipe shall be installed in such a manner, and shall posses the necessary strength and durability to prevent the escape of solids, liquids, and gasses there from under all known adverse conditions, such as corrosion, strains due to temperature changes, settlement, vibrations,and superimposed loads. 10. Depth of bury shall be 5'6" below finish grade. No joints will be allowed between the corporation stop and the curb stop. 11. All wtermain shall be looped and double fed, and shall be extended to the far limits of the development, and in size appropriate for future development, as directed by the City Engineer. Recapture and over-sizing may be applicable. 12. The developer shall reimburse the City of Yorkville for the cost of water to fill and test new watermains,and also for the cost of laboratory tests after chlorination. The water cost shall be at the bulls rate charged by the City of Yorkville at that time. The volume of water shall be calculated as the volume of two and one-half times the lengths and diameters of new watermains. 13. Watermain proposed to cross existing city streets shall be constructed by directional boring. Open-cut construction shall not be allowed without consent from the Public Works Director. 14. Connections to existing watermains shall employ line stops to minimize the disruption of service to existing residents. S-14 Standard Specifications for Improvements SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM A complete sanitary sewer system is required for all new development The minimum internal size of sanitary sewer main shall be eight inches in diameter. The top of the sewer main shall be a minimum of three feet lower than the lowest floor elevation at all service connection locations,but not less than eight feet below finished grade, wherever possible. Should the sewers serving a particular development not be deep enough to serve the basement, as noted above, then overhead plumbing will be required However, all levels of the building must be served by gravity, with only the below-grade levels being served by a pump unit The City Engineer may require that certain buildings not have subgrade levels due to special situations. The sanitary sewer shall be extended to the development's far extremes, as directed by the City Engineer, for proper and orderly growth. The city Engineer will also direct the sizing and grades for the sewer,so as to fit the overall plan for the City. The City strongly discourages the use of lift stations, but if the City Engineer approves the use of a public lift station, the following shall be required as a minimum.: A. The pumps shall be submersible,with a back up pump and well-designed wet well. B. The station building shall be a brick structure with conventional-pitched roofing and paved access. The building shall comply with all International Building Code regulations, and shall be heated and ventilated. The subdivider shall follow normal building permit procedures,and pay the normal fees for construction of the lift station building. C. The unit will be equipped*ith a back-up power source,utilizing natural gas as a fuel,and can operate on manual or fully automatic mode,complete with a variable exercise mode. D. The motor control center shall have a solid-state duplex logic. Sewage level in the wet well shall be measured with a pressure transducer. A dial-out alarm system matching that currently in use in the City shall be provided. E. The City Engineer must approve any and all lift stations, and may require other improvements. F. There shall be good-quality noise control, and all electronic components shall be explosion- proof G. Force mains shall be sized to carry the initial, intermediate, and ultimate flow rates from the tributary area, at a velocity of between 3.0 and 6.0 feet per second. Material shall be watermain quality Ductile Iron with polyethylene encasement Gate valves in vaults shall be constructed in the force main at intervals not exceeding 600 feet, to allow quick isolation in the event of a leak Blow-off valves in vaults shall be constructed at high points in the force main, and shall discharge to sanitary sewers, where possible. Force mains shall be tested at 150-psi for two hours,similar to watermain testing. H. The sub-divider shall maintain an inventory of each size and type fuse, relay, and other plug- in type devices used in the lift station motor control center, as recommended by the manufacturer. These items shall be housed in a wall mounted metal cabinet The subdivider shall also supply a heavy-duty free standing metal shelf with not less than square feet of shelf space,and one(1) fire extinguisher rated for Type A,B,and C fires. I. The sub-divider shall provide start-up training to the Public Works Department personnel,and shall provide three sets of Operations and Maintenance Manuals for all equipment at the lift station. 1. Underground conduit shall be heavy-wall PVC. 5-15 Standard Specifications for Improvements K. The exterior of the wet well shall be waterproofed. The City may require the wet well to have a minimum internal diameter of up to eight feet Sewer construction cannot start until the Illinois Environmental Pollution Agency (IEPA) has notified the City Engineer that approvals have been secured. Sanitary sewer pipe shall be PVC plastic pipe,with a minimum SDR 26. All pipe and fittings shall be pressure rated in accordance with ASTM D-2241 and ASTM D-3139 (per AWWA C-900) for sizes 6-15 inches. Solvent joints are not permitted All public sanitary sewers will be air and mandrel tested(7-point minimum) by the developer, at his expense, under the supervision of the City Engineer. One copy of the report shall be forwarded to the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District, and one report shall be forwarded to the City Engineer. All testing will be done in conformance with the "Standard Specifications For Water and Sewer Main Construction in Illinois",current edition. All public sanitary sewers shall be internally televised in color and recorded on videotape and written log by the developer,at his expense;under the supervision of the-City Engineer,to ensure that the sewers are straight,unbroken,tight,and flawless. There must be good-quality lighting for a sharp and clear image of all sewer segments. Poor quality images will result in re-televising the system, at the developer's expense. The videotape must clearly mark the segment being televised through manhole numbering, and the image must clearly identify the footage as it progresses through the pipe. One copy of the complete videotapes and written log shall be forwarded to the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District,and one complete set shall be forwarded to the City Engineer. All manholes will be required to be internally vacuum tested by the developer, at his expense, under the supervision of the Engineer. This test will check the integrity of the complete structure, from the invert to the casting, including all adjusting rings. One copy of the test results shall be forwarded to the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District, and one copy shall be forwarded to the City Engineer. Vacuum testing of each manhole shall be carried out immediately after assembly backfilling,and rough grading, and shall be witnessed and approved by the City Engineer. All lift holes shall be plugged with an approved non-shrinking grout No grout will be placed in the horizontal joints before testing. All pipes entering the manhole shall be plugged, taking care to securely brace the plugs from being drawn into the manhole. The test head shall be placed at the inside of the top of the casting and the seal inflated in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. A vacuum of ten inches of mercury shall be drawn and the vacuum pump shut off. With the valve closed,the time shall be measured for the vacuum to drop to nine inches. The manhole shall pass if the time is greater.than 60 seconds for a 48-inch diameter, manhole, 75 seconds for a 60-inch manhole, and 90 seconds for a 72-inch manhole. All manhole castings shall be Neenah No.R-1030 frame,East Jordan No. 105123,and Type B cover,or approved equal. If the manhole fails the initial test, necessary repairs shall be made with a non-sbzink grout,while the vacuum is still being drawn. Retesting shall proceed until a satisfactory test result is obtained. If the rim of a sanitary manhole needs to be reset or adjusted after successful vacuum testing,but before the expiration oft eh one-year warranty period, it shall be sealed and adjusted properly in the presence of the City Engineer. Failure to do so will require the manhole to be vacuum tested again. All manhole frames shall be Neenah No. R-1030, East Jordan No., 105123, or approved equal, with Type B covers. All Type B covers shall have"City of Yorkville"and"Sanitary"cast into the lid, and shall have concealed pick holes with a machined surface and watertight rubber gasket seals. All manhole segments, including the frame and adjusting rings,shall be set with butyl rope joint sealant Manholes shall be minimum four-foot diameter, and shall not be located in pavement,curb,gutter,or sidewalk 5-16 Standard Speeiticadons for Impevvemmts All sanitary sewer manholes shall be provided with approved cast in place rubber boots (flexible manhole sleeve), having a nominal wall thickness of 3116" with a ribbed concrete configuration and with stainless steel binding straps,properly sized and installed for all conduits. All manholes shall be reinforced precast concrete, and shall be located at intersections and spaced at a maximum interval of 300 feet, except that a closer spacing may be required for special conditions. The maximum allowable amount of adjusting rings shall be eight inches in height using as few rings as possible. All manholes shall be marked at the time of construction with a four-inch:by four-inch hardwood post neatly installed vertically and with a minimum three-feet bury and a minimum four-foot exposed. The top one-foot of the post shall be neatly painted white. Wells and septic systems are allowed in Estate-residential developments that are not within 250 feet of water and/or sewer service. When each lot is within 250 feet of water and/or service,that lot may maintain their septic and/or well only until failure of the septic or well. At that time the lot must,if within 250 feet of the sewer and/or water line hook-up to the sewer and/or water,as the case may be, connect to the City utilities at the lot owner's sole expense. After connection to the City Sanitary Sewer System,individual septic fields shall be abandoned by pumping out the tank, knocking in the cover, and filling with dirt or stone in accordance with Health Department regulations. TRAFFIC STUDY A traffic study may be required,and shall include: 1. Levels of service for existing conditions; 2. Levels of service for post-construction conditions; 3. All calculations shall be conducted according to the"Highway Capacity Manual"; 4. Recommendations as to additionalllimited access,additional lanes,signalization,etc. If the City of Yorkville requires a traffic study for a development,that study will be contracted for by the City, and paid for by the developer. The developer shall establish a Traffic Study deposit with the City of Yorkville, in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer. The City shall return any unused portion of the deposit to the developer upon approval of a Final Plat or Site Plan. If the land use plan of the development changes during the approval process,the developer may be required to make additional deposits to fund re-analysis and revisions to the Traffic Study. The need or requirement for a traffic impact study shall be determined during the concept or preliminary planning stage of the proposed development The developer/subdivider shall meet with City of Yorkville officials during one of these stages for the purpose of determining the traffic study requirements. Wlien the City of Yorkville requires that a traffic study be prepared based upon the above, the study shall include, but not be limited to, addressing the following issues: INTRODUCTION: A general description of the proposed development, including it's size, location,the political jurisdiction in which the site is located,the boundary limits of the study area, and any other information needed to aide in the review of the development's traffic impacts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A description of the existing and proposed land uses of the development If alternative land uses are being proposed,the highest trip generation uses shall be assigned for each land use. SITE ACCESSMILITY: A clear and concise description of the proposed ingress/egress points to the proposed development,including a sight distance analysis. 5-17 standard Specifications for Improvements EXISTING EXTERNAL ROADWAY NETWORK: A description of the existing external roadway networking the vicinity of the proposed development,to include functional classification, primary traffic control devices, signalized intersections, roadway configurations, geometric features (curves and grades), lane usage, parking regulations, street lighting, driveways servicing sites across from or adjacent to the site, and right-of-way data The area of influence shall be determined by the traffic generated from the site, the trip distribution of traffic, and the trip assignment of the traffic generated by the development over the surrounding area road network. EXISTING AM PM & TOTAL DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES: Existing AM, PM, and total daily traffic volumes for access driveways (if existing),intersections, and the roadway network in the site vicinity shall be determined and displayed on a graphic(s)in the final report To determine AM and PM existing traffic volumes, machine counts and/or manual counts shall be conducted during a three-hour period of the morning, between approximately 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM of an average or typical weekday, and also between approximately 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM, on an average or typical weekday. Peak hour counts may be required on Saturday and/or Sunday, depending on the proposed land use. All AM and PM peak hour counts shall be recorded and summarized in fifteen-minute increments, and be included in the Appendix of the final report Manual counts shall include vehicle classifications, i.e. passenger cars, single-unit, multi-unit trucks and buses. Traffic counts shall show both entering and exiting traffic at the proposed access points (if existing),in addition to turning and through traffic movements at critical intersections_ TRIP GENERATION RATES AND VOLUMES: Trip generation rates and volumes for eaLh type of proposed land use shall be determined for the AM and PM peak hours, and total daily volumes may be required on Saturday and/or Sunday, depending on the proposed land use. The trip generation rates shall be calculated from the latest data available contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's "Trip Generation Manual". If trip generation rates for a specific land use are not available from the "Trip Generation Manual", the United City of Yorkville shall approve the substitute rates. SITE-GENERATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION & ASSIGNMENT: The most logically traveled routes in the vicinity of the development shall be used for trip distribution and assignment purposes. The directional distribution of site-generated traffic approaching and departing the development should be shown in both graphic and tabular form. All assumptions used in the determination of distribution and assignment shall be clearly stated. EXISTING PLUS SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES: Existing, plus site-generated traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours, and total daily traffic for access drives, intersections, and the roadway network in the site vicinity shall be determined and displayed on a graphics) in the final report. Traffic volumes shall show both entering and exiting traffic at the proposed access points, in addition to turning and through traffic movements at critical intersections. FUTURE TRAFFIC MKSTING PLUS SITE-GENERATED VOLUMES: Future traffic (existing,plus site-generated traffic volumes) for the AM and PM peak hours, and the total daily traffic for access drives,intersections,and roadway network in the site vicinity shall be determined and displayed on a graphic(s) in the final report. Projected increases in the external (non site' related)roadway traffic must also be determined. The selection of a horizon year for which traffic operation conditions are to be characterized may be considered as the date full build-out and occupancy is achieved. If the project is a large multi-phased development in which several stages of development activity are planned, a number of horizon years may be required, that correspond to the bringing on line of major development phases. Horizon dates should be times to coincide with major stages of the overall project, or to coincide with increments of area transportation system improvements. S-18 Standard Specifications for Impmvements INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS: Proposed access driveways and influenced intersections shall be subject to an existing, plus projected, capacity analysis. Projected traffic conditions shall include the effects of any committed developments within the influenced area The existing and projected levels of service derived from the analysis shall be used to aid in the evaluation of design and operation alternatives of the access driveways and influenced intersections. The capacity analysis shall be in accordance with the techniques descnW in the most recent edition of the Transportation Research Board's "Highway Capacity Manual", Special Report 209. SIGNALIZATION WARRANTS: If it is anticipated that the development's driveway(s) or existing external non-signalized intersections will satisfy signalization warrants,a warrant analysis shall be conducted,using the projected volumes determined from the trip generation. The results of such an analysis shall be tabulated in the traffic impact study. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMIyIENDATIONS: Clear and concise descriptions of the findings shall be presented in the final report_ These findings shall include all recommended improvements for access facilities, internal roadways and intersections, and external roadway and intersection improvements. 5-19 Si-mdard Specifications for improvements DRIVEWAY AND PARKING LOT PAVING ALL DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING LOTS SHALL BE PAVED AS PER THE FOLLOWING SPECIFICATIONS: 1. ASPHALT: A. RESIDENTIAL Two-inch I-11 bituminous concrete surface, over eight-inches (minimum) of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed graveL B. COMNIERCLALgNDUSTRIAL Three-inch I-11 bituminous concrete surface, over ten-inches (minimum) of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed gravel. 2. CONCRETE: A- RESIDENTIAL Six-inch Class X, over six-inches (minimum) of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed gravel. B. COMAKERCIALANDUSTRLAL Eight-inch Class X, over eight-inches of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed gravel. 3. PAVING BRICK: A. RESIDENTIAL Paving brick over one inch of sand and eight inches of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed gravel. 4. SEALCOAT: A. CONITERCIALJINDUSTRIA.L An A3 seal coat, as defined by the IDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, may be allowed on areas behind the building, when used as a temporary surface, not to exceed three years, after which it must be paved to the above specifications. The same base should be ten inches (minimum) of compacted CA6 limestone or crushed gravel. S-20 Standard Specifications for Improvements This Resolution shall be in full force and effect form and after its due passage, approval,and publication,as provided by law. Passed and approved by the Mayor of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois, This day ,200` . ayor Passed and approved by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, This Q- day f ,200` . ATTEST City Clerk SEAL RICHARD STICKA WANDA OHARE VALERIE BURD LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS PAUL JAMES JOE BESCO ROSE SPEARS S-21 r 0 O V � +s= w � � w •� � O C> 0 0 0 O O O O O ,� N U) LD Ln LO v N N N LO G o to E 0 a� E O o O O o O O 0 r„ .E L17 l(7 lt7 lf) 0 lf7 Lf7 O O O O O O O O > V U *� O � U E o o o e o e H X m n LO U') u7 m Lo .� � O 4° c' 3 m o °o °o o 0 0 °O o CO (D rn N N N N r r r N y 4� F— > 0 3 ;. p (D .a N m r N m m E o O U X X X X X X X X Lr)N fi r m to cm m co c° tiq cn w VI G D o cd 16 E 0 00 0 0 O O O O O O LCD O O O Y-i 2 � 4 GO 0 0 0 r r r l[] �ye O , q� -E ? + ' b ' C:) ai 71 71 o C O ?3 I.n M cce) cQ cn O [r3 O U _ O f7 0 0 O O N •E j � o O I� CO CD fD G j v .21 O bo 7 N x 42 "C7 r 7 N 0 U x E 'c .� O c6 0 o as aD m E v, O c cu w yr u) m u7 0 m X v a K L: o � o w ? -d b o ,� L w v is o _ o v� p p � g S c O U p � IE iF r~ �d c L) U ..0.1 �' U Resolution No. 2009- H0 RESOLUTION MODIFYING A POLICY REGARDING PROCEDURE AND AUTHORITY TO REDUCE LETTERS OF CREDIT AND PERFORMANCE BONDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF LAND IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville requires that land developers provide security for the successful completion of the installation of public and quasi-public (together also known as Iand improvements), including but not limited to streets, curbs, sidewalks, watermains, storm and sanitary sewers, streetlights, detention basins, landscaping, etc.; and, WHEREAS, security to ensure completion of land improvements must be provided either in the form of a Performance Bond or Letter of Credit; and, WHEREAS, from time to time, a land developer will seek reduction in the principal amount of the Letter of Credit or the Performance Bond amount after substantial completion of a portion of the land improvements which are the responsibility of the developer; and, WHEREAS, in order to ensure completion of all improvements to be constructed by the land developer in accordance with applicable code requirements, it is in the best interest of the City to adhere to the security requirements as now in full force and effect and permit the reduction of such security under certain circumstances, all as hereinafter set forth. BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois: Section I. The approval process for reduction of the amount of a Letter of Credit and/or Performance Bond shall be as follows: a. The City Engineer shall issue a written recommendation including the basis for approving, denying, or modifying a request for reduction. Said written recommendation shall include the amount of the reduction based upon the Engineer's estimate of probable cost as adjusted by an inflation factor from the initial date of issuance of the Letter of Credit or Performance Bond to the date of reduction. In order to calculate the inflation factor, the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index shall be used. The City Engineer shall also report the remaining amount of the Letter of Credit and/or Performance Bond after reduction. b. The City Engineer's written recommendation shall be forwarded to the City Administrator for approval. c. Upon the City Administrator's concurrence with the City Engineer's recommendation, the reduction shall be deemed approved or denied and the City Engineer is authorized to issue a letter to implement the decision. d. In the event the City Administrator does not concur with the City Engineer's recommendation, the Mayor shall have final authority to approve or deny the City Engineer's recommendation. e. A developer may appeal the decision of the City Administrator to the Mayor, who shall review and make a final determination to affirm or reverse the City Administrator's initial decision. £ The City Administrator or designee shall issue reports, quarterly or more frequently as deemed appropriate, to the Mayor and City Council that summarize Letter of Credit and/or Performance Bond reduction requests that have been received and actions taken pursuant to those requests. Section 11. Final acceptance/approval of land improvements and corresponding reduction/release of Letters of Credit and/or Performance Bonds for developments whose initial Letter of Credit or Performance Bond amounts is less than $1,000,000 shall also be handled in accordance with the procedures established by this policy. Final acceptance/approval of land improvements and corresponding reduction/release of Letters of Credit and/or Performance Bonds for developments whose initial Letter of Credit or Performance Bond amounts are $1,000,000 or more shall be placed before the City Council for approval. Section III. The retainage used in calculations for Letters of Credit and/or Performance Bond reductions is twenty percent(20%). Section IV. Resolution 2004-15 adopted February 24,2009, is hereby repealed. Section V. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2009. ROBYN SUTCLIFF GEORGE GILSON, JR. ARDEN JOE PLOCHER DIANE TEELING GARY GOLINSKI MARTY MUNNS \ ! ROSE SPEARS WALLY WERDERICH `emu APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this c?$ day of SEP fM 6f A.D. 2009. ayor Attest: 22.08 CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS and GUARANTEES, CONSTRUCTION and MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS, ACCEPTANCE of PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS and MAINTENANCE PERIOD A. Construction and Maintenance Requirements: The site grading and erosion con- trol, water distribution system, sanitary sewer system, stormwater management system, street system, street lights, sidewalks, bicycle paths, driveway approaches, landscaping, tree planting, and natural area restoration for every subdivision/planned development shall be constructed in strict accordance with the approved engineering plans and specifications therefore, and the standards set forth in Sections 22.05, 22.06 and 22.07 herein. The public improvements shall be maintained by the subdivider/developer for a minimum of 18 months after the Village Engineer has certified completion of the public improvements in compliance with the maintenance requirements set forth herein. Security (pursuant to Section 22.08-Clb herein) shall be posted with the Village to guarantee the completion of, payment and repairs of the public improve- ments. B. Construction Standards: The public improvements for all subdivisions and planned developments shall be constructed in a good and workmanlike manner in strict accordance with the standards set forth in Sections 22.05, 22.06 and 22.07 herein and the approved final engineering plans and specifications therefore. C. Guarantee of Completion, Payment and Construction: The Village Board will not cause the final plat/plan of any subdivision/planned development to be signed and recorded until the subdivider/developer and the owner have (1) satisfied all the terms and conditions of the ordinance approving of the Preliminary Plat; (2) has executed and delivered to the Village Clerk a Public Improvement Completion Agreement; (3) has tendered cash or filed with the Village Clerk a performance bond/labor and material payment bond or letter of credit to guarantee that all required public improvements will be completed pursuant to this Chapter 22 and the engineering plans and specifications approved by the Village Engineer within a reasonable time and subject to the approval of the Village Board and to further guarantee that the public improvements will be fully paid for and properly maintained pursuant to this Chapter 22; and (4) has complied with all of the provisions of this Chapter 22. 1. Guarantee Public Improvements: To guarantee that the public improve- ments will be completed within the time limits, fully paid for and properly maintained,the subdivider/developer shall file with the Village Clerk: a. A Public Improvements Completion Agreement(Appendix G), b. One of the following forms of guarantee of performance and pay- ment ("construction security") in an amount equal to 120 percent of the estimated construction cost of the public improvements, which have been approved by the Village Engineer, shall be filed with the Village Clerk. I. Cash deposit. II. A performance bond-labor and material payment bond co- signed by a surety licensed to do business in Illinois and having a policy rating of at least A- and a financial rating of Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 1 312110 at least VIII in the latest edition of the A. M. Best's Insur- ance Guide (Appendix F). I11. An irrevocable letter of credit issued by a federally insured financial institution with assets of at least $50,000,000, and a capital asset ratio of at least 6 percent(Appendix F). The Village Attorney must approve the construction security. It shall be the developer/subdivider's obligation to have the financial institution issuing the letter of credit to furnish a current financial statement to the Village. C. Cost estimates shall be prepared by the subdivider's engineer and submitted to the Village Engineer for approval not less than 30 days prior to a request for execution of a plat by the Village. The Village Engineer shall estimate and certify to the Village Board the amount of security, which shall be a minimum of 120 percent of the reasonably estimated cost of the public improvements plus such additional amount as may be required. The Village Board shall approve the required security. d. If the scheduled completion date for any of the public improve- ments is more than one year after the date on which any cash de- posit is made or bond or letter of credit is issued, the amount of such cash deposit, bond, letter of credit or escrow deposit shall be increased by 1.25 percent for each month or fraction thereof by which such scheduled completion date exceeds one year to allow for estimated construction cost increases and repairs to partially completed improvements. For example, if parkway and open space restoration is not scheduled for completion until 30 months after the security deposit is made, the security shall be equal to 137.5 percent of the estimated construction cost of parkway and open space restoration and 120 percent of the estimated construction cost of the other public improvements, assuming the other public improvements are reasonably estimated to be completed within one year. e. After final plat approval a construction inspection escrow account shall be established with the Village. The escrow sum shall be three percent of the Village Engineer's estimated cost of the subdi- vision improvements. This deposit shall be made prior to the exe- cution and recording of the final plat of subdivision. 2. Record of Account: The Treasurer shall maintain a complete record of each cash deposit, bond or letter of credit established to guarantee comple- tion of public improvements, the name of the subdivision, the estimated cost of the public improvements, the scheduled completion dates and the date on which any bond or letter of credit expires. The Treasurer shall re- port quarterly to the Manager on the status of each such cash deposit, completion bond and letter of credit. Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 2 312110 3. Time Limits: The time limits may be extended up to one year by the Man- ager upon the recommendation of the Village Engineer and the Public Works Director, for good cause shown, provided the construction security is extended to cover the new completion date and adjusted for estimated increased costs. The time limits may be extended beyond one year by the Village Board, in its sole discretion, provided the construction security is extended to cover the new completion date and adjusted for increased costs. 4. Expiration of Letter of Credit: Upon receipt of the notice of expiration of any letter of credit to the Treasurer, the Village Engineer shall issue a writ- ten status report to the Treasurer indicating which, if any, of the public improvements are not complete, and either recommend the construction security be (a) extended, and if extended, whether the amount of the con- struction security must be increased to cover the incomplete work, or (b) collected such (1) that the cash deposit be forfeited, (2) the letter of credit be drawn upon, or(3) claim to be made on the bond to cover the estimated cost of the incomplete work plus a sum equal to 15 percent of the engi- neer's original estimate of cost to satisfy the subdivider/developer's main- tenance security obligation. In the event the subdivider/developer fails to renew and/or extend the letter of credit as requested, the Treasurer shall draw the entire amount available under such letter of credit or make a claim on the performance bond/labor and material payment bond before the time limits for filing suit on said bond. The Treasurer shall maintain the proceeds of any forfeited cash deposit drawn on a letter of credit or monies paid by a surety bond company in a separate fund to be used solely for payment of the cost of completion of the public improvements for that subdivision/planned development, including engineering fees and any le- gal expenses incurred in the forfeiture of the letter of credit or bond. 5. Cost Estimate: If an engineer's estimate of cost is more than six months old at the time the plat is recorded, a revised estimate of cost shall be pro- vided, reviewed and approved by the Village Engineer at the subdi- vider/developer's expense. 6. Reduction Requests: The subdivider/developer may request reductions in the balance of the construction security upon completion of each eligible category of public improvement. The reduction will be 90 percent of the original estimated amount for each eligible category. The remaining 10 percent shall be retained to cover punch list work. Also an additional 15 percent of the approved estimate of the cost of construction of the public improvements shall be retained until the public improvements have been accepted and the maintenance guarantee posted with the Village. Specific security reductions information is available from the Village Engineer. D. Permits Required: None of the work specified in this Section 22.08-D shall be performed on any portion of the subdivision/planned development until the Village has issued the following special permits: 1. Early Grading Permit: An early earthwork permit may be issued by the Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 3 312110 Public Works Director only after all of the items listed in the Site Devel- opment Permit Checklist and Early Grading Permit Checklist of Appendix E have been completed, the subdivider/developer has executed a Hold Harmless Agreement for Early Grading (see Appendix E), and has posted cash or a letter of credit in an amount sufficient to perform said earth work and to completely restore the property to its original condition if the pro- ject is not subsequently approved by the Village. 2. Site Development Permit: A site development permit may be issued by the Village only after all of the items listed in the Site Development Permit Checklist (see Appendix E) have been completed and the Village Board has passed an ordinance approving the final subdivision plat/planned de- velopment plan. 3. Demolition Permits: Prior to the demolition of any existing structure on the proposed subdivision/planned development, the subdivider/developer shall apply for and be issued a demolition permit pursuant to Chapter 23, Building Codes, of this Code. Demolition permits shall also be required for abandoning private wells and septic systems. A county Department of Public Health permit shall accompany the demolition permit application. 4. Tree Removal Permit; The removal of trees is governed by Section 5.15 of this Code. 5. Other Permits: Any other applicable permit issued by the EPA, Army Corps of Engineers, state, county, etc., shall be required before initiating any early earthwork, site development, demolition or tree removal. E. Inspection of Public Improvements Required: Public improvements shall be sub- ject to inspection by the Public Works Director both during the course of construction and after construction is completed. The Village Engineer shall have authority over construction, materials, methods of construction and workmanship to insure compliance with this Chapter 22 and the approved plans. The subdivider/developer shall provide for reasonable tests and proof of quality of materials as reasonably requested by the Village Engineer. The Village Engineer may require that work be suspended for due cause, which shall include adverse weather conditions, questionable materials or methods of construction or workmanship, or failure to adhere to this Chapter 22 or the approved plans. 1. Notification: It shall be the responsibility of the subdivider/developer or its general contractor to notify the Public Works Director when work will be- gin and to request inspections. The initial notification that a particular im- provement will begin shall be in writing and every request for an inspec- tion must be received by the Public Works Director at least 72 hours in advance of the requested inspection. 2. Subdivider/Developer Responsible: Failure of any Village employee, in- spector, agent or official to detect construction work or materials which fail to meet the requirements of this Chapter 22 and/or the approved plans, shall in no way relieve the subdivider/developer of full responsibility for adherence by it and all contractors and material suppliers to this Chapter Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 4 312110 22 and the approved plans nor for failure to adhere to high standards of materials, methods and workmanship. 3, Inspection and A roval: When all the public improvements, including the public improvements of separate phase or unit, are completed in their en- tirety, the developer/subdivider shall formally request the Village Engi- neer in writing to certify completion of the public improvements. Upon re- ceipt of the request letter the Village Engineer, in conjunction with the Public Works Director,will schedule a final inspection to take place when reasonably possible. The 18-month maintenance period begins after the first final inspection. Another final inspection is conducted at the end of the 18-month maintenance, which allows the developer to turn all im- provements over to the Village. Due to the inability to determine whether parkway trees are living during winter months, and the inability to conduct certain other inspections due to snow and ice cover, the Village Engineer will not certify completion or recommend acceptance by the Village Board between November 1 and May 1. All deficient public improvements which do not totally conform to this Chapter 22 and the approved plans will be put on a written punch list. The punch list will be forwarded to the developer/subdivider for processing. When the developer/subdivider has corrected the deficiencies on the punch list, a second final inspection of the Village Engineer shall be requested. Scheduling a second inspection is the same as the final inspection. If the length of time between the initial final inspection and the second final inspection is greater than four months, or if the noted deficiencies have not been corrected for the second final inspection, the request for certification of acceptance may be can- celed by the Village Engineer. If canceled, a second request letter will be required, and the certification will be subject to the following additional requirements: a. The developer/subdivider shall be required to pay all costs incurred by the persons conducting the inspection, including, but not limited to, Village staff. b. The punch list recorded during the initial final inspection will be voided and a complete re-inspection may be required. Neither acceptance nor certification of completion by the Village Engineer or acceptance by any employee, inspector, agent or official of the Village, nor maintenance of the public improvements by the Village shall be deemed accepted by the Village. No public improvements shall be ac- cepted or deemed to be accepted until the Village Board passes an ord - nance accepting such public improvements on the written recommendation of the Village Engineer and upon satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Section 22.08-H herein. Certification and Village Board acceptance shall not occur until after the final inspection at the end of the 18-month main- tenance period. 4. Required Barricades: Once house or commercial structure construction ac- tivities have started, the subdivider/developer shall have on the project site Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 5 312110 at all times a minimum of 12 type 2 barricades with lights, which can be erected as needed during repair activities to curb, pavement, sidewalk or other public improvement, to protect the public. An additional 12 barri- cades must be available at all times. F. Protection and Repair of Existing Public Improvements: The subdivider/developer and its contractors, subcontractors and material suppliers shall be jointly and severally responsi- ble for protecting the existing public improvements in the subdivision/planned development against damage resulting from their construction activities in the subdivision/planned develop- ment and assuring the Village that such existing public improvements and Village property are not damaged or rendered less useful or unsightly as a result of the construction activities. This provision includes any and all damages to, and any nuisance created upon, all lands, improve- ments and landscaping of the Village or other governmental entities and public agencies; damage to existing streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, driveway approaches and parkways, by the passage of equipment or trucks, or by excavation for any purpose; the spilling or tracking of earth, sand or rock onto existing streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters or parkways; erosion by stormwater of earth, gravel, sand or other debris onto streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, drainage swales, manholes, valve vaults, inlets or catch basins; or the damage of water mains, sanitary sewer, b-boxes, hydrants, culverts or storm sewers. To reduce or localize the possibility of damage to streets by heavy trucks,the subdivider/developer and its contractors, subcontractors and material suppliers shall follow access instructions of the Public Works Director. The subdivider/developer shall be absolutely responsible for the enforcement of the access instruc- tions upon its contractors, subcontractors and their suppliers. Where deemed advisable, the Village Board, upon the recommendation of the Public Works Director, shall require, either prior to construction or after construction is in progress, that the subdivider/developer post additional security in the form of a cash bond, performance bond/labor and material payment bond or a letter of credit to guarantee the repair of any damages or abatement of any nuisance, caused, suffered or permitted by the subdivider/developer, its contractors or material suppliers. Until such security has been posted, construction shall be discontinued. The Village may draw upon such cash bond, performance bond/labor and material payment bond or letter of credit to pay for any expenses that have been or may be incurred by the Village for cleaning its streets, catch basins and sewers, regrading of landscaping drainage swales, and repairing any damages to its public improvements. G. Conclusion of the Public Improvement Construction: The completion date of the public improvements shall be the first day of the next month following completion of the public improvements and all punch list work certified by the Village Engineer based on the Village Engineer's determination that all of the conditions set forth in Section 22.08-H herein have been satisfied. H. Acceptance Procedure for Public Improvements: Public improvements shall be accepted only by the passage of an ordinance by the Village Board upon the recommendation of the Village Engineer. Such recommendation shall be contingent on satisfying the following conditions: I. Work in Accordance with Plans: All the public improvements shall be completed in a good and workmanlike manner using materials of good quality and shall be maintained in good repair by the subdivider/developer in accordance with the standards and requirements of this Chapter 22 as of a date certain, and no component part of the public improvements shall be Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 6 312110 accepted until all of the component parts of the public improvements throughout the subdivision/planned development have been completed in accordance with the approved plans and this Chapter 22 and maintained by the subdivider/developer. 2. Waivers: The developer/subdivider has provided to the Village Engineer sworn statements from each prime contractor with whom it contracted for the construction, installation, repair and maintenance, and a final waiver of lien from every person and entity that furnished labor and/or material in connection with the public improvements, including final waivers from all subcontractors and material suppliers shown on first tier subcontractor's waivers to protect the Village from mechanic's lien claims through the completion date. 3. Test Reports: Where required by this Chapter 22, or reasonably deemed necessary by the Village Engineer, test reports showing compliance with this Chapter 22 and the approved plans must be provided to the Village Engineer. 4. Village Attorney Approval: The Village Attorney shall provide a written report to the Village Board that the developer/subdivider or owner, as the case may be, has or have made all necessary conveyances and approved the form of the maintenance guarantee posted by the developer/subdivider. 5. Village Clerk Approval: Written acknowledgment from the Village Clerk of receipt of the original maintenance guarantee approved by the Village Attorney. 6, Warranty Title: Delivery of a warranty title, approved by the Village At- torney transferring title to the public improvements to the Village, deliv- ered to the Village Clerk. 7. Benchmarks: At least two benchmarks must be set in each subdivision. One benchmark for up to 80 acres and one for each additional 40 acres or part thereof. Benchmark settings shall be coordinated with the Public Works Department at the developer/subdivider's cost. For additional stan- dards refer to the Appendix H, Standard Specifications for Construction and Estimating. 8. Submittal of Final Plans: One reproducible mylar set and two sets of prints of the record drawings shall be submitted to the Village Engineer. The re- cord drawings shall include service location information for sanitary sewer and potable water for each lot and reflect all field changes for location and elevation of public improvements. 9. Inspection of Improvements: All sanitary sewers must be clean; must have passed the required tests. A videotape of the sewer interior shall be sub- mitted to the Village. All sanitary sewer and valve vaults manholes must be water tight and clean. All fire hydrants must be at grade and all oper- able hydrant auxiliary vales must be keyable. All catch basins, inlets and Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 7 312110 storm sewer lines must be free of dirt and debris. No manholes, valve vault frames and drainage structure frames located within roadways may protrude above the roadway surface, but must be even with, or no more than one-half inch below the roadway surface. A full stand of grass shall have been established on all parkways and drainage swales. In the opinion of the Village Arborist all dead, dying or diseased parkway trees shall have been replaced. All domestic "buffalo" boxes shall have been adjusted to proper grade, located and keyed by Public Works personnel. All struc- turally cracked or sinking sidewalks, driveways, aprons or curbs shall have been replaced. Variations in roadway surfaces shall not be greater than one-quarter inch in 10 feet as checked using a 20-foot long straight-edge in each wheel lane. All roadway surface and base course thickness must be within substantial compliance with the approved plans and specifications. The Village shall have received a set of record drawings showing the loca- tions of all water and sanitary sewer service connections and the minimum light levels specified in the lighting standards of this Chapter 22. All fail- ures must have been repaired and all defects corrected. The public im- provements must have been constructed in substantial compliance with the approved plans. At the time of the walk through, the subdivider/developer shall submit "as builts" of the entire project, including the location of drain tiles. The "as-builts" shall be submitted as prints and electronically in AutoCAD. I. Guarantee for Maintenance of Public Improvements: The subdivider/developer shall post adequate security to guarantee the maintenance of the public improvements and every component part of the public improvements in an acceptable condition for the maintenance period as defined in Section 22.08 44 herein and to guarantee payment for all maintenance work. To guarantee that the public improvements will be maintained during the maintenance period and to guarantee payments for all labor and/or material during the maintenance period, the subdivider/developer shall file with the Village Clerk one of the following forms of guarantee of maintenance in an amount equal to 15 percent of the engineer's estimate of the construction cost of the public improvements as approved by the Village Engineer. 1. Cash deposit. 1 A maintenance bond co-signed by a surety having a surety rating of at least an A- and a financial rating of at least a VIII in the latest edition of A. M. Best's Insurance Guide (Appendix E). 3. An irrevocable letter of credit issued by a federally insured financial insti- tution with assets of at least $50,000,000 and a capital asset ratio of at least 6 percent(Appendix E). J. Responsibility for Maintenance: The subdivider/developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of all the public improvements for its subdivision/planned development for the maintenance period, and for the payment of all costs associated therewith. 1. Maintenance Obligations: The subdivider/developer's maintenance re- sponsibilities obligations shall include, but are not limited to: (a) maintain- ing the public improvements, (b) repairing any damage to the public im- Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 8 312110 provements caused by the subdivider/developer, its agents, servants, em- ployees or its successors and assigns, or by any contractor hired by the subdivider/developer, its agents, servants, employees, successors or as- signs, or any subcontractor hired by such contractor, (c) repairing or re- placing any defective workmanship or material in the public improve- ments, (d) protecting the Village against the results of any defective workmanship or materials appearing to have been incorporated in any part of the public improvements which shall have appeared or been discovered within the maintenance period, and (e) paying for the cost of all such maintenance work. In the event that any such pubic improvements are damaged, the burden shall be on the subdivider/ developer to show that such damage was not caused by the subdivider/developer, its agents, ser- vants, employees, successors or assigns, or by any contractor hired by the subdivider/developer, its agents, servants, employees, successors or as- signs, or any subcontractor hired by such contractor. 2. Village Services: During the maintenance period, the Village will provide its customary street sweeping and snow plowing services, and enforce Section 41.01, Traffic Regulations, of this Code, on the public streets of a subdivision/planned development, but any and all other maintenance of the public improvements shall be performed by the subdivider/developer. An Agreement for Snow and/or Ice Removal on Unaccepted Streets (Ap- pendix I) shall be entered into by the subdivider/developer prior to winter. 3. Term of Maintenance Period: The maintenance period shall commence on the completion date certified by the Village Engineer and continue for a minimum of 18 months. The Village Engineer shall establish the length of the maintenance period so the expiration date occurs between May 1 and November 1. Notwithstanding the length of the maintenance period, the maintenance guarantee shall be 18 months. Approximately 90 days before the expira- tion of the maintenance period,the Village Engineer and Public Works Di- rector shall conduct a maintenance inspection. In the event the inspection reveals any deficiencies in the public improvements, the deficiencies will be inventoried and placed on a maintenance punch list, which will be mailed, via certified mail, return receipt requested, to the devel- oper/subdivider. The Village Engineer shall also prepare an estimate of the approximate cost to correct the deficiencies and forward the estimate to the Treasurer. The developer/subdivider shall have 45 days from the date the maintenance punch list is mailed to correct and remedy all deficien- cies. Prior to the expiration of the maintenance period, the Village Engi- neer and Public Works Director shall conduct a final inspection to deter- mine compliance. In the event any uncorrected deficiencies remain or any new deficiencies are discovered, the Village Engineer shall provide a writ- ten estimate of the cost to correct any remaining and new deficiencies to the Treasurer. Within 30 days of the end of the maintenance period, the devel- oper/subdivider shall furnish to the Village Engineer a general contractor's Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 9 312110 sworn statement from each prime contractor who performed by of the maintenance work and final waivers of lien from all persons and entities that furnished labor and/or materials in connection with the maintenance work. In the event there are uncorrected deficiencies during the maintenance period and/or missing waivers of lien, the Treasurer shall either (a) deduct from the cash deposit an amount sufficient to correct said deficiencies, in- cluding all estimated engineering, legal and other expenses to cover the cost of preparing specifications, bid documents (if applicable) and con- tract(s) to perform such corrective work, and to cover any potential lien claims based on missing waivers of lien, (b) deliver a notice to the surety demanding performance of its obligations under the maintenance bond, (c) deliver a site draft to the issuer of the maintenance letter of credit in an amount sufficient to correct the deficiencies, including estimated engineer, legal and other expenses to cover the cost of preparing specifications, bid documents (if applicable) and contract(s) to perform any corrective work, and to cover any potential lien claims based on missing waivers of lien. This shall be completed before the expiration of the 18-month mainte- nance guarantee. K. Installation of Improvements: A schedule of installation dates and/or time periods in which required improvements will be installed, including the time period between temporary and final improvements (e.g., base/binder/aggregate course and final surface course for streets) in compliance with Appendix G herein, shall be submitted to the Village Engineer and Public Works Director for approval at the time the letter of credit is established with the Village. In the event a required improvement does not meet the approved schedule or completed improvements are deemed to be failing by the Public Works Director, the Village may draw upon the cash deposit, bond or letter of credit to complete those improvements. When a schedule of installation dates has not been submitted and improvements are not completed, or those completed are deemed by the Public Works Director to be failing, the Village may draw upon the cash deposit, bond or letter of credit to complete those improve- ments. Chapter 22, Section 22.08, Page 10 312110