The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet 2011 08-09-11 C�r� United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST. 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 o co Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Nengaoi C°uN hZCE '►rye AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 p.m. Tuesday,August 9, 2011 Call to Order: Pledge of Allegiance: Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV George Gilson,Jr. Jackie Milschewski Marty Munns Rose Ann Spears Carlo Colosimo Larry Kot Chris Funkhouser Diane Teeling Establishment of Quorum: Amendments to Agenda: Presentations: 1. Certificate of Appreciation Presented to Clarence Holdiman Public Hearings: Citizen Comments: Consent Agenda: 1. CC 2011-88 Bills for Payment- $466,512.53 2. EDC 2011-29 Removal of SSAs from Undeveloped Portion of Grande Reserve a. Ordinance Terminating Special Service Area Number 2004-103 North Grande Reserve and Repealing Ordinance No. 2004-50—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute b. Ordinance Terminating Special Service Area Number 2004-105 South Grande Reserve and Repealing Ordinance No. 2004-51 —authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 3. PS 2011-20 Police Reports for June-July 2011 4. PS 2011-22 Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Providing for Liquor Control Regarding BASSET Training—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 5. PS 2011-23 Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Proving for Liquor Control Regarding Beer Garden/Patio Licenses—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 6. PS 2011-18 Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Regulating On-Street Parking (McHugh Road)—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute City Council Meeting Agenda August 9, 2011 Page 2 Minutes for Approval: 1. CC 2011-89 Minutes of the City Council—July 12, 2011 Mayor's Report: 1. CC 2011-90 Appointment of Building Code Official (Building Inspector/Zoning Officer) 2. CC 2011-91 KenCom Intergovernmental Agreement Public Works Committee Report: 1. PW 2011-44 Progressive Energy Natural Gas Proposal Economic Development Committee Report: Public Safety Committee Report: 1. PS 2011-13 Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Regulating On-Street Parking (East Millbrook Circle)— Second Reading 2. PS 2011-21 Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Providing for Liquor Control Regarding Class A, Class G and Class CA Liquor Licenses—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute Administration Committee Report: 1. CC 2011-48 An Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of One or More Series of General Obligation Refunding Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source) Series 2011 of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, in an Aggregate Principal Amount Not to Exceed$12,000,000 Park Board: Plan Commission: Zoning Board of Appeals: 1. ZBA 2011-01 Ordinance Approving Sign Variances at 9675 Route 34/Veterans Parkway(Herron Property) City Council Report: City Clerk's Report: City Treasurer's Report: Community and Liaison Report: Staff Report: Additional Business: Executive Session: 1. For litigation, when an action against, affecting, or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting. 2. The purchase or lease of real property for use of the public body. City Council Meeting Agenda August 9, 2011 Page 3 Executive Session (cont'd): 3. For collective negotiating matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees. Adjournment: COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES _PUBLIC WORKS August 16, 2011 -6: OO.pjat_—Citx Hall Conference ROOn ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Conference R-------- ---------------------------- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Gilson Public Works Park Board Committee: Alderman Teeling Engineering YBSD Committee: Alderman Kot Parks and Recreation Committee: Alderman Milschewski :ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: September_6,_2011 —6:30 p.m.—City Hall_Conference Room Committee e ~� Departments� Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Munns Community Development Plan Commission Committee: Alderman Funkhouser Building Safety and Zoning Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp. Committee: Alderman Milschewski Kendall Co. Plan Commission Committee: Alderman Teeling :PUBLIC SAFETY: September 8 2011 —6:30 m.—Cit Hall Conference Room. = - -------------- - - P - -2 p' - - -�' - - - - - -m Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Colosimo Police Human Resource Comm. Committee: Alderman Spears School District Committee: Alderman Kot Committee: Alderman Funkhouser -ADMINISTRATION: August 18 2011 —6:00 m.—City Hall Conference Room- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Spears Finance Library Committee: Alderman Gilson Administration Committee: Alderman Colosimo Committee: Alderman Munns UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, August 9, 2011 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENTATIONS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Certificate of Appreciation Presented to Clarence Holdiman ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONSENT AGENDA: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2011-83 Bills for Payment - $466,512.53 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2011-29 Removal of SSA from Undeveloped Portion of Grande Reserve a. Ordinance Terminating Special Service Area Number 2004-103 North Grande Reserve and Repealing Ordinance No. 2004-50 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to b. Ordinance Terminating Special Service Area Number 2004-105 South Grande Reserve and Repealing Ordinance No. 2004-51 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PS 2011-20 Police Reports for June-July 2011 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. PS 2011-22 Ordinance Amending City Code Providing for Liquor Control Regarding BASSET Training ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. PS 2011-23 Ordinance Amending City Code Providing for Liquor Control Regarding Beer Garden/Patio Licenses ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. PS 2011-23 Parking on McHugh Road Near Reimenschnieder Park ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2011-89 Minutes of the City Council—July 12, 2011 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR'S REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- l. CC 2011-90 Appointment of Building Code Official ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CC 2011-91 KenCom Intergovernmental Agreement ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2011-44 Progressive Energy Natural Gas Proposal ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PS 2011-13 Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Regulating On-Street Parking (E. Millbrook Circle)— Second Reading ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PS 2011-21 Ordinance Amending City Code Providing for Liquor Control Regarding Class A, Class G, and Class CA Liquor Licenses ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2011-48 Ordinance Authorizing the Issuance of One or More Series of General Obligation Refunding Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source) Series 2011 in an Aggregate Principal Amount Not to Exceed $12,000,000 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ZBA 2011-01 Ordinance Approving Sign Variances at 9675 Route 34/ Veterans Pkwy(Herron Property) ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPORTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ CA#1 II Finance ■ EST. , � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Public Works ❑ CC 2011-88 dal County El`E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Bill Payments - $466,512.53 Meeting and Date: City Council 08/09/11 Synopsis: Approval of bill payments. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Amy Simmons Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511629 AACVB AURORA AREA CONVENTION 063011-ALL 06/20/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-ALL SEASON 01-640-54-00-5481 22.68 02 JUNE HOTEL TAX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 22.68 * 063011-HAMPTON 07/20/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-HAMPTON INN 01-640-54-00-5481 3,706.13 02 JUNE 2011 HOTEL TAX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 3,706.13 * 063011-SUPER 07/20/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-SUPER 8 JUNE 01-640-54-00-5481 1,687.43 02 2011 HOTEL TAX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,687.43 * CHECK TOTAL: 5,416.24 511630 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 610-7132462 07/19/11 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 31.67 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 31.67 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 31.68 INVOICE TOTAL: 95.02 * 610-7141904 07/26/11 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 31.27 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 31.27 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 31.27 INVOICE TOTAL: 93.81 * CHECK TOTAL: 188.83 511631 ARROLAB ARRO LABORATORY, INC. 43237 06/24/11 01 WATER OP-2 COLIFORM 51-510-54-00-5429 33.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 33.00 CHECK TOTAL: 33.00 -1- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511632 ATTINTER AT&T INTERNET SERVICES 070911 07/09/11 01 ADMIN-T.1 SERVICE 01-110-54-00-5440 462.82 INVOICE TOTAL: 462.82 CHECK TOTAL: 462.82 511633 AUBERRYP PATRICIA AUBERRY 072411 07/28/11 01 ADMIN-BEECHER DEPOSIT REFUND 01-000-24-00-2410 100.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 100.00 CHECK TOTAL: 100.00 511634 AUTOSP AUTOMOTIVE SPECIALTIES, INC. 17813 07/26/11 01 WATER OP-FUEL FILTER 51-510-54-00-5495 113.42 INVOICE TOTAL: 113.42 CHECK TOTAL: 113.42 511635 B&FTECH B&F TECHNICAL CODE SERVICES 33369 07/07/11 01 COMM/DEV-ENERGY CODE PLAN 01-220-54-00-5459 576.45 02 REVIEW, SINGLE FAMILY HOME ** COMMENT ** 03 PLAN REVIEW ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 576.45 * 33370 07/07/11 01 COMM/DEV-ENERGY CODE PLAN 01-220-54-00-5459 704.90 02 REVIEW, SINGLE FAMILY HOME ** COMMENT ** 03 PLAN REVIEW ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 704.90 * 33376 06/30/11 01 COMM/DEV-JUNE PLAN REVIEW & 01-220-54-00-5459 2, 593.50 02 INSPECTIONS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 2,593.50 * -2- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001_WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511635 B&FTECH B&F TECHNICAL CODE SERVICES 33377 06/30/11 01 COMM/DEV-JUNE PLUMBING 01-220-54-00-5459 1,000.00 02 INSPECTIONS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 4,874.85 511636 BANCAMER BANC OF AMERICA LEASING 011932919 07/23/11 01 FINANCE-COPIER LEASE 01-120-54-00-5485 143.00 02 ADMIN-COPIER LEASE 01-110-54-00-5485 143.00 03 COMM/DEV-COPIER LEASE 01-220-54-00-5485 136.50 04 ENG-COPIER LEASE 01-150-54-00-5485 136.50 05 POLICE-COPIER LEASE 01-120-54-00-5485 277.00 06 WATER OP-COPIER LEASE 51-510-54-00-5485 33.00 07 STREETS-COPIER LEASE 01-410-54-00-5485 33.00 08 SEWER OP-COPIER LEASE 52-520-54-00-5485 33.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 935.00 CHECK TOTAL: 935.00 511637 BNYCORP THE BANK OF NEW YORK 252-1562992 07/12/11 01 DEBT SERVICE-05A ADMIN FEES 42-420-54-00-5498 374.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 374.50 CHECK TOTAL: 374.50 511638 BPAMOCO BP AMOCO OIL COMPANY 30717180-PD 07/24/11 01 POLICE-GASOLINE 01-210-56-00-5695 448.06 INVOICE TOTAL: 448.06 CHECK TOTAL: 448.06 511639 BPAMOCO BP AMOCO OIL COMPANY -3- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511639 BPAMOCO BP AMOCO OIL COMPANY 30717181-PW 07/24/11 01 STREETS-GASOLINE 01-410-56-00-5695 259.49 02 WATER OP-GASOLINE 51-510-56-00-5695 259.47 03 SEWER OP-GASOLINE 52-520-56-00-5695 259.47 INVOICE TOTAL: 778.43 CHECK TOTAL: 778.43 511640 BRENNTAG BRENNTAG MID-SOUTH, INC. BMS47552 07/13/11 01 WATER OP-CHEMICALS 51-510-56-00-5638 1,209.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,209.50 * BMS876058 07/14/11 01 WATER OP-DRUM RETURN CREDIT 51-510-56-00-5638 -350.00 INVOICE TOTAL: -350.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 859.50 511641 BROIHLAW LAW OFFICE OF J.C. BROIHIER 1161 06/01/11 01 POLICE-NEW RULES AND 01-210-54-00-5411 262.50 02 REGULATIONS MATTER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 262.50 CHECK TOTAL: 262.50 511642 CALLONE UNITED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS 1010-7980-0000-0711C 07/15/11 01 ADMIN-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-110-54-00-5440 188.77 02 ADMIN-CITY HALL NORTEL 01-110-54-00-5440 282.77 03 POLICE-CITY HALL NORTEL 01-210-54-00-5440 282.76 04 WATER OP-CITY HALL NORTEL 51-510-54-00-5440 282.76 05 POLICE-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5440 548.18 06 ADMIN-CITY HALL FIRE 01-110-54-00-5440 36.89 07 POLICE-CITY HALL FIRE 01-210-54-00-5440 36.89 -4- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511642 CALLONE UNITED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS 1010-7980-0000-0711C 07/15/11 08 WATER OP-MONTHLY CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5440 885.53 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,544.55 CHECK TOTAL: 2,544.55 511643 CAMBRIA CAMBRIA SALES COMPANY INC. 31381 07/07/11 01 SEWER OP-PAPER TOWEL, TOILET 52-520-56-00-5620 168.84 02 PAPER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 168.84 * 31416 07/14/11 01 ADMIN-GARBAGE BAGS, ODOR 01-110-56-00-5610 97.45 02 DEODORIZER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 97.45 * CHECK TOTAL: 266.29 511644 CARDIS CARROLL DISTRIBUTING 062579 07/21/11 01 WATER OP-CLEAR GUARD GLOSS 51-510-56-00-5620 81.54 INVOICE TOTAL: 81.54 CHECK TOTAL: 81.54 511645 CARGILL CARGILL, INC 3215213 07/08/11 01 WATER OP-BULK ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,769.28 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,769.28 * 3216095 07/11/11 01 WATER OP-BULK ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,861.31 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,861.31 * 3218099 07/13/11 01 WATER OP-BULK ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,636.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,636.60 * -5- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001_WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511645 CARGILL CARGILL, INC 3218648 07/14/11 01 WATER OP-BULK ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,731.92 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,731.92 CHECK TOTAL: 10,999.11 511646 CHEMICAL CHEMICAL PUMP SALES & SERVICE 71267 07/19/11 01 WATER OP-FILTERS 51-510-56-00-5638 63.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 63.00 CHECK TOTAL: 63.00 511647 COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 4329092028-0611A 07/21/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 997.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 997.10 * 6963019021-0611A 07/15/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 5.58 INVOICE TOTAL: 5.58 * 7090039005-0611A 07/11/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 21.49 INVOICE TOTAL: 21.49 * 8344010026-0611A 07/22/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 187.59 INVOICE TOTAL: 187.59 * CHECK TOTAL: 1,211.76 511648 CPICOMP CHRISTOPHER J. PLASCH CPI-491 05/25/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-MAY ON SITE 01-640-54-00-5462 720.00 02 IT ASSISTANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 720.00 CPI-502 06/30/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-JUNE ON SITE 01-640-54-00-5462 800.00 -6- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511648 CPICOMP CHRISTOPHER J. PLASCH CPI-502 06/30/11 02 IT ASSISTANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 800.00 * CPI-514 07/20/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-JULY ONSITE 01-640-54-00-5462 640.00 02 IT ASSISTANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 640.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 2,160.00 511649 DAVEAUTO DAVID L CHELSEN 18201 07/19/11 01 POLICE-BRAKE WORK 01-210-54-00-5495 492.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 492.00 CHECK TOTAL: 492.00 511650 DEPO DEPO COURT REPORTING SVC, INC 15029 07/13/11 01 POLICE-JULY 6 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 175.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 * 15034 07/15/11 01 POLICE-JULY 13 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 175.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 350.00 511651 ELECTDIS ELECTRICAL DISCOUNT SUPPLY 5437 06/24/11 01 SEWER OP-FUSES 52-520-56-00-5613 44.85 INVOICE TOTAL: 44.85 CHECK TOTAL: 44.85 511652 EXELON EXELON ENERGY -7- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511652 EXELON EXELON ENERGY 200307000110 07/23/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 3,228.43 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,228.43 CHECK TOTAL: 3,228.43 511653 EYEMED FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INS. 4099569 07/14/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-AUGUST VISION 01-640-52-00-5223 847.65 02 INSURANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 847.65 CHECK TOTAL: 847.65 511654 FARREN FARREN HEATING & COOLING 7272 07/20/11 01 STREETS-HVSAC REPAIR AT 01-410-56-00-5656 1,200.00 02 BEECHER CENTER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,200.00 CHECK TOTAL: 1,200.00 511655 FENCECON FENCE CONNECTION, INC. #2 07/22/11 01 LAND CASH-NET POSTS & 72-720-60-00-6036 9,197.57 02 RETAINAGE FOR RAINTREE B ** COMMENT ** 03 TENNIS COURT FENCING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 9,197.57 CHECK TOTAL: 9,197.57 511656 FIRST FIRST PLACE RENTAL 214330-1 07/13/11 01 WATER OP-FLAGS 51-510-56-00-5620 25.47 INVOICE TOTAL: 25.47 CHECK TOTAL: 25.47 -8- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511657 FIRSTNON FIRST NONPROFIT UNEMPLOYEMENT 072011 07/20/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-ELIMINATE 01-640-52-00-5230 16,335.04 02 NEGATIVE BALANCE IN RESERVE ** COMMENT ** 03 ACCOUNT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 16,335.04 CHECK TOTAL: 16,335.04 511658 FREDRICR ROB FREDRICKSON 073111 08/01/11 01 FINANCE-JULY CELL PHONE 01-120-54-00-5440 45.00 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 511659 GARDKOCH GARDINER KOCH & WEISBERG H-1845C-78224 07109111 01 ADMIN SERVICES-LAY-COMM MATTER 01-640-54-00-5461 957.61 INVOICE TOTAL: 957.61 * H-1961C-78222 07/09/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-KENDALL 01-640-54-00-5461 986.29 02 MARKET PLACE MATTERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 986.29 * H-1974C-78219 07/09/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-IEPA MATTERS 01-640-54-00-5461 5,679.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 5,679.50 H-2013C-78223 07/09/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-HAMMAN FEES 01-640-54-00-5461 74.00 02 MATTERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 74.00 H-2364C-78221 07/09/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-KIMBALL HILL 01-640-54-00-5461 156.89 02 MATTERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 156.89 -9- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511659 GARDKOCH GARDINER KOCH & WEISBERG H-2644C-78220 07/09/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-KENCOMM MATTERS 01-640-54-00-5461 185.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 185.00 CHECK TOTAL: 8,039.29 511660 GJOVIKCH GJOVIK CHEVROLET-BUICK-GMC CVCS171391 07/21/11 01 POLICE-ENGINE COOLANT LEAK 01-210-54-00-5495 917.58 02 REPAIR ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 917.58 CVCS171428 07/25/11 01 POLICE-ENGINE ELECTRICAL 01-210-54-00-5495 510.81 02 REPAIR AND REPLACED POWER ** COMMENT ** 03 STEERING PUMP ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 510.81 CHECK TOTAL: 1,428.39 511661 GODWINL LISA GODWIN 062111 07/26/11 01 ADMIN-JULY 21 MEETING MINUTES 01-110-54-00-5462 162.89 INVOICE TOTAL: 162.89 072011 07/20/11 01 ADMIN-JULY 20 MEETING MINUTES 01-110-54-00-5462 63.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 63.00 CHECK TOTAL: 225.89 511662 GOLINSKI GARY GOLINSKI 073111 08/01/11 01 ADMIN-JULY CELL PHONE 01-110-54-00-5440 45.00 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 -10- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511663 HACH HACH COMPANY 7332330 07/14/11 01 WATER OP-CHEMICALS 51-510-56-00-5638 469.09 INVOICE TOTAL: 469.09 CHECK TOTAL: 469.09 511664 HDSUPPLY HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD. 3029394 07/14/11 01 WATER OP-BOTTOM PLATE GASKETS, 51-510-56-00-5664 316.80 02 CHAMBERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 316.80 * 3213961 07/22/11 01 WATER OP-BUSHING 51-510-56-00-5664 73.13 INVOICE TOTAL: 73.13 * CHECK TOTAL: 389.93 511665 HOMEDEPO HOME DEPOT 1010167 06/23/11 01 STREETS-FUSES 01-410-56-00-5656 21.94 INVOICE TOTAL: 21.94 * 2010068 06/22/11 01 STREETS-JACKS, AUGER 01-410-56-00-5656 43.56 INVOICE TOTAL: 43.56 * 6140720 06/08/11 01 STREETS-FILTERS 01-410-56-00-5640 85.68 INVOICE TOTAL: 85.68 * CHECK TOTAL: 151.18 511666 ILLCO ILLCO, INC. 1211549 07/12/11 01 STREETS-CLOSET SPUD 01-410-56-00-5656 10.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 10.00 CHECK TOTAL: 10.00 -11- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511667 ILPD4778 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE 072711 07/27/11 01 ADMIN-BACKGROUND CHECK 01-110-54-00-5462 34.25 INVOICE TOTAL: 34.25 072711-A 07/27/11 01 ADMIN-BACKGROUND CHECK 01-110-54-00-5462 34.25 INVOICE TOTAL: 34.25 CHECK TOTAL: 68.50 511668 ILTOLL ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY 611361490 07/05/11 01 POLICE-TOLLS FOR PERIOD OF 01-210-54-00-5415 33.30 02 04/011/11 - 06/30/11 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 33.30 CHECK TOTAL: 33.30 511669 INTAPOL INTAPOL INDUSTRIES, INC. 0179664-IN 05/26/11 01 POLICE-BREECHES 01-210-56-00-5600 90.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 90.98 CHECK TOTAL: 90.98 511670 INTEGRYS INTEGRYS ENERGY SERVICES, INC 17642930-1 07/26/11 01 WATER OP-2702 MILL ROAD 51-510-54-00-5480 1,313.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,313.60 CHECK TOTAL: 1,313.60 511671 IPWSOA IPWSOA 0914-16A 07/28/11 01 WATER OP-CONFERENCE 51-510-54-00-5412 165.00 02 REGISTRATION FOR ONE PERSON ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 165.00 -12- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511671 IPWSOA IPWSOA 0914-16B 07/28/11 01 WATER OP-CONFERENCE 51-510-54-00-5412 165.00 02 REGISTRATION FOR ONE PERSON ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 165.00 CHECK TOTAL: 330.00 511672 ITRON ITRON 201617 07/12/11 01 WATER OP-COMM FEE, HOST HEAD 51-510-54-00-5462 438.69 02 END OPS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 438.69 CHECK TOTAL: 438.69 511673 JCM JCM UNIFORMS, INC. 656099 07/25/11 01 POLICE-PANTS 01-210-56-00-5600 79.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 79.95 CHECK TOTAL: 79.95 511674 KCCONC KENDALL COUNTY CONCRETE 27666 07/21/11 01 LAND CASH-CONCRETE 72-720-60-00-6036 848.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 848.00 27667 07/21/11 01 WATER OP-CONCRETE 51-510-56-00-5620 580.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 580.00 CHECK TOTAL: 1,428.00 511675 KENPRINT ANNETTE M_ POWELL 18457 07/13/11 01 POLICE-500 BUSINESS CARDS 01-210-54-00-5430 44.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 44.00 CHECK TOTAL: 44.00 -13- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511676 LEYENDEK KRISTIA R.M. LEYENDECKER 0615-16-21 07/11/11 01 ADMIN-JUNE 15 HRC , JUNE 16 01-110-54-00-5462 184.25 02 ADMIN, JUNE 21 PW MEETING ** COMMENT ** 03 MINUTES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 184.25 CHECK TOTAL: 184.25 511677 MCCUE MC CUE BUILDERS, INC. 021711-DEP 07/22/11 01 ADMIN-REFUND UNUSED SECURITY 01-000-24-00-2415 13,011.00 02 GUARANTEE FOR TEMPORARY ** COMMENT ** 03 OCCUPANCY IMPROVEMENTS AT ** COMMENT ** 04 1162 KATE DR. ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 13,011.00 CHECK TOTAL: 13,011.00 511678 MCCUE MC CUE BUILDERS, INC. 031511DEP 07/22/11 01 ADMIN-REFUND UNUSED SECURITY 01-000-24-00-2415 10,795.50 02 GUARANTEE FOR TEMPORARY ** COMMENT ** 03 OCCUPANCY IMPROVEMENT AT ** COMMENT ** 04 1358 SPRING STREET ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10,795.50 CHECK TOTAL: 10,795.50 511679 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 1018 07/13/11 01 LAND CASH-SHANK, SUBFORM FILE 72-720-60-00-6036 17.91 INVOICE TOTAL: 17.91 * 1080 07/13/11 01 LAND CASH-CARRBOLTS, WOOD 72-720-60-00-6036 107.05 02 BORING BIT, SCREWS, BOARDS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 107.05 * -14- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001_WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511679 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 1121 07/13/11 01 LAND CASH-PVC PIPE, PVC ELBOW, 72-720-60-00-6036 12.75 02 PVC COUPLING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 12.75 * 1126 07/13/11 01 WATER OP-BATTERIES 51-510-56-00-5620 16.84 INVOICE TOTAL: 16.84 * 1337 07/14/11 01 LAND CASH-BOARDS 72-720-60-00-6036 12.94 INVOICE TOTAL: 12.94 * 1626 07/15/11 01 LAND CASH-HOOKS, HITCH RINGS, 72-720-60-00-6036 54.69 02 COLD SHUTS, COIL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 54.69 * 1718 07/15/11 01 LAND CASH-DUCK TAPE, PAINT 72-720-60-00-6036 65.92 INVOICE TOTAL: 65.92 * 2596 07/18/11 01 LAND CASH-COIL, HOOKS, SPADE 72-720-60-00-6036 62.62 02 BIT, HITCH RINGS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 62.62 * 2624 07/18/11 01 WATER OP-REINFORCING MESH, 51-510-56-00-5620 28.49 02 EXPANSION JOINT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 28.49 * 2822 07/19/11 01 POLICE-WIPERS 01-210-54-00-5495 17.94 INVOICE TOTAL: 17.94 3065 07/20/11 01 WATER OP-FOAM CVR SLIT, ROLLER 51-510-56-00-5620 16.80 02 FRAME, PAINT TRAY LINER, PAINT ** COMMENT ** 03 TRAY, EXTENSION POLE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 16.80 3101 07/20/11 01 STREETS-PLUG 01-410-56-00-5640 7.27 INVOICE TOTAL: 7.27 -15- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511679 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 3352 07/21/11 01 LAND CASH-WASHERS, S-HOOKS, 72-720-60-00-6036 125.67 02 HEX NUTS, LOCKBOLTS, COIL, ** COMMENT ** 03 BOARDS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 125.67 * 3384 07/21/11 01 SEWER OP-SPRAY PAINT 52-520-56-00-5613 23.01 INVOICE TOTAL: 23.01 * 3449 07/21/11 01 LAND CASH-HITCH RINGS, LAG 72-720-60-00-6036 19.62 02 SCREW EYES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 19.62 * 3700 07/22/11 01 STREETS-BATTERIES 01-410-56-00-5620 20.94 INVOICE TOTAL: 20.94 * 757 07/12/11 01 STREETS-POST MOUNT STEEL 01-410-56-00-5620 7.97 INVOICE TOTAL: 7.97 * 759 07/12/11 01 POLICE-AQUA NOODLES FOR CAR 01-210-56-00-5620 135.36 02 SEAT INSTALLS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 135.36 * 773 07/12/11 01 LAND CASH-LOCK BOLT, HEX BOLTS 72-720-60-00-6036 444.96 02 BOARDS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 444.96 * 99578 07/08/11 01 LAND CASH-PVC COUPLING, PVC 72-720-60-00-6036 39.52 02 PIPES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 39.52 * 99610 07/08/11 01 STREETS-LIQUID BAITS 01-410-56-00-5640 6.27 INVOICE TOTAL: 6.27 * 99703 07/08/11 01 STREETS-TUB DRAIN REMOVER, WAX 01-410-56-00-5656 15.40 • -16- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511679 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 99703 07/08/11 02 BOWL RING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 15.40 CHECK TOTAL: 1,259.94 511680 METLIFE METLIFE SMALL BUSINESS CENTER 071811 07/18/11 01 ADMIN SERVICE-LIFE INSURANCE 01-640-52-00-5222 1,035.42 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,035.42 CHECK TOTAL: 1,035.42 511681 METROMAY METROPOLITAN MAYOR'S CAUCUS 2011-287 06/10/11 01 ADMIN-CAUCUS 2010-2011 DUES 01-110-54-00-5490 592.24 INVOICE TOTAL: 592.24 CHECK TOTAL: 592.24 511682 MOONBEAM DIANE GIANNELLI OAKLEY 135 07/28/11 01 ADMIN-JUNE 28 CC MEETING VIDEO 01-110-54-00-5462 50.00 02 TAPING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 136 07/12/11 01 ADMIN-JULY 12 CC MEETING VIDEO 01-110-54-00-5462 100.00 02 TAPING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 100.00 CHECK TOTAL: 150.00 511683 NCL NCL EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES 9628 07/14/11 01 STREETS-4' LATH BUNDLE 01-410-56-00-5656 96.56 INVOICE TOTAL: 96.56 CHECK TOTAL: 96.56 -17- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 511684 NEXTEL NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 837900513-113-CITY 07/21/11 01 COMM/DEV-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-220-54-00-5440 112.00 02 POLICE-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5440 876.10 03 POLICE-REPL. RIMCURVE 8350I 01-210-54-00-5440 99.99 04 SEWER OP-MONTHLY CHARGES 52-520-54-00-5440 133.23 05 STREETS-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-410-54-00-5440 205.24 06 WATER OP-MONTHLY CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5440 205.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,632.16 CHECK TOTAL: 1,632.16 511685 NICOR NICOR GAS 07-72-09-0117 7-0711 07/25/11 01 ADMIN-1301 CAROLYN CT 01-110-54-00-5480 29.23 INVOICE TOTAL: 29.23 * 83-80-00-1000 7-0711 07/12/11 01 ADMIN-610 TOWER LANE UNIT B 01-110-54-00-5480 28.40 INVOICE TOTAL: 28.40 * CHECK TOTAL: 57.63 511686 OLSONB BART OLSON 073111 08/01/11 01 ADMIN-JULY CELL PHONE 01-110-54-00-5440 45.00 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 511687 PHILSTOP PHIL'S TOP SOIL, INC. 26261 07/16/11 01 WATER OP-DIRT 51-510-56-00-5620 60.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 60.00 CHECK TOTAL: 60.00 -18- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511688 PITBOW PITNEY BOWES 1970458-JYll 08/06/11 01 ADMIN-04/30/11 - 07/30/11 01-110-54-00-5462 700.00 02 RENTAL CHARGES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 700.00 CHECK TOTAL: 700.00 511689 QUILL QUILL CORPORATION 5388350 07/12/11 01 POLICE-PHOTO PAPER 01-210-56-00-5610 30.58 INVOICE TOTAL: 30.58 * 5480055 07/15/11 01 POLICE-PRINTER CARTRIDGES 01-210-56-00-5610 214.80 INVOICE TOTAL: 214.80 * CHECK TOTAL: 245.38 511690 R0000937 TRACI HART 071611 07/27/11 01 ADMIN-BEECHER DEPOSIT REFUND 01-000-24-00-2410 50.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 CHECK TOTAL: 50.00 511691 R0000938 MARK PERRY 072611 07/26/11 01 STREETS-SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT 01-410-60-00-6041 60.00 02 PROGRAM REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 60.00 CHECK TOTAL: 60.00 511692 R0000939 MARCIA HINMAN 072311 07/28/11 01 ADMIN-BEECHER DEPOSIT REFUND 01-000-24-00-2410 50.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 CHECK TOTAL: 50.00 -19- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001_WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511693 SHELL SHELL OIL CO. 065159923107-PW 07/26/11 01 STREETS-GASOLINE 01-410-56-00-5695 1,647.09 02 WATER OP-GASOLINE 51-510-56-00-5695 1,647.09 03 SEWER OP-GASOLINE 52-520-56-00-5695 1,647.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 4,941.28 CHECK TOTAL: 4,941.28 511694 SHELL SHELL OIL CO. 065356230107-PD 07/13/11 01 POLICE-GASOLINE 01-210-56-00-5695 7,025.33 INVOICE TOTAL: 7,025.33 CHECK TOTAL: 7,025.33 511695 SOFTWARE SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE 410590 07/20/11 01 POLICE-ON SITE TRAVEL TIME 01-210-54-00-5415 25.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 25.00 CHECK TOTAL: 25.00 511696 STREICH STREICHERS I850006 07/12/11 01 POLICE-3 BADGES 01-210-56-00-5600 310.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 310.00 I852461 07/22/11 01 POLICE-SHIRT 01-210-56-00-5600 33.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 33.99 CHECK TOTAL: 343.99 511697 TAPCO TAPCO I369234 06106111 01 STREETS-POSTS, CONES, 01-410-56-00-5620 504.12 -20- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511697 TAPCO TAPCO 2369234 06106111 02 BARRICADES ** COMMENT ** 03 WATER OP-POSTS, CONES, 51-510-56-00-5620 504.11 04 BARRICADES ** COMMENT ** 05 SEWER OP-POSTS, CONES, 52-520-56-00-5620 504.11 06 BARRICADES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,512.34 CHECK TOTAL: 1,512.34 511698 TAPCO TAPCO I369234-MFT 06/06/11 01 MFT-BARRICADES, CONES, POSTS 15-155-56-00-5619 766.25 INVOICE TOTAL: 766.25 CHECK TOTAL: 766.25 511699 TAPCO TAPCO I370405 06/21/11 01 STREETS-BARRICADE LIGHTS 01-410-56-00-5620 133.00 02 WATER OP-BARRICADE LIGHTS 51-510-56-00-5620 133.00 03 SEWER OP-BARICADE LIGHTS 52-520-56-00-5620 133.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 399.00 CHECK TOTAL: 399.00 511700 TROTSKY TROTSKY INVESTIGATIVE YORKVILLE PD 11-01 07/22/11 01 POLICE-OFFICER APPLICANT EXAM 01-210-54-00-5411 250.00 02 POLICE-CADET APPLICANT EXAM 01-210-54-00-5462 125.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 375.00 CHECK TOTAL: 375.00 511701 TUFFY KRIBBS AUTOMOTIVE, INC DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511701 TUFFY KRIBBS AUTOMOTIVE, INC 24031 07/15/11 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE 01-210-54-00-5495 20.76 INVOICE TOTAL: 20.76 * 24039 07/16/11 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE 01-210-54-00-5495 23.96 INVOICE TOTAL: 23.96 * 24240 07/26/11 01 POLICE-BRAKE REPAIR, OIL 01-210-54-00-5495 505.68 02 CHANGE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 505.68 * CHECK TOTAL: 550.40 511702 UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 00004296X2291 07/16/11 01 ADMIN-1 PKG. TO KFO 01-110-54-00-5452 53.57 02 WATER OP-1 PKG. TO ILEPA LAB 51-510-54-00-5452 16.26 INVOICE TOTAL: 69.83 * 00004296X2301 07/23/11 01 ADMIN-1 PKG. TO KFO, 1 PKG. TO 01-110-54-00-5452 49.30 02 CODE BLUE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 49.30 * CHECK TOTAL: 119.13 511703 VEOLIA VEOLIA ES SOLID WASTE MIDWEST T00000682516 06/25/11 01 HEALTH & SANITATION-JUNE 01-540-54-00-5442 100,426.50 02 SERVICES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 100,426.50 CHECK TOTAL: 100,426.50 511704 VIKICHEM VIKING CHEMICAL COMPANY 217755 07/13/11 01 WATER OP-CHEMICALS 51-510-56-00-5638 906.23 INVOICE TOTAL: 906.23 CHECK TOTAL: 906.23 -22- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511705 VISA VISA 07/27/11-CITY 07/27/11 01 FINANCE-REOCURRING WEBSITE 01-120-54-00-5462 15.77 02 MONTHLY UPKEEP FEE ** COMMENT ** 03 ADMIN-WATER FILTER FOR 01-110-56-00-5610 37.18 04 REFRIGERATOR ** COMMENT ** 05 STREETS-MONTHLY CABLE 01-410-54-00-5462 19.98 06 WATER OP-NMONTHLY CABLE 51-510-54-00-5462 19.98 07 SEWER OP-MONTHLY CABLE 52-520-54-00-5462 19.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 112.90 CHECK TOTAL: 112.90 511706 VISA VISA 072711-PD 07/27/11 01 POLICE-TRAINING MEAL COSTS & 01-210-54-00-5415 887.70 02 POLICE-FUNERAL FLOWERS 01-210-56-00-5620 179.67 03 POLICE-KEYBOARD, MOUSE, USB 01-210-56-00-5635 55.16 04 CONNECTOR ** COMMENT ** 05 IACP CONFERENCE LODGING ** COMMENT ** 06 POLICE-IACP MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 01-210-54-00-5460 240.00 07 FOR TWO PEOPLE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,362.53 CHECK TOTAL: 1,362.53 511707 WALMART WALMART COMMUNITY 072211-CITY 07/22/11 01 ADMIN-KLEENEX, CLOROX WIPES 01-110-56-00-5610 21.83 INVOICE TOTAL: 21.83 CHECK TOTAL: 21.83 511708 WARDC TINA C WARD 063011 07/13/11 01 FINANCE-JUNE ACCOUNTING AND 01-120-54-00-5462 270.00 -23- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511708 WARDC TINA C WARD 063011 07/13/11 02 CONSULTING SERVICES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 270.00 CHECK TOTAL: 270.00 511709 WAREHOUS WAREHOUSE DIRECT 1193002-0 07/08/11 01 ADMIN-RUBBER FINGERS 01-110-56-00-5610 1.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 1.50 CHECK TOTAL: 1.50 511710 WATERPRO RI WATERMAN PROPERTIES 081811-21 08/01/11 01 WATER OP-GRANDE RESERVE COURT 51-510-75-00-7502 22,988.77 02 ORDERED PAYMENT #21 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 22,988.77 CHECK TOTAL: 22,988.77 511711 WATERSYS WATER SOLUTIONS UNLIMITED, INC 29979 05/18/11 01 WATER OP-PHOSPHATE 51-510-56-00-5638 1,017.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,017.00 CHECK TOTAL: 1, 017.00 511712 WHOLTIRE WHOLESALE TIRE 138288 07/22/11 01 POLICE-TIRE REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 15.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 15.00 CHECK TOTAL: 15.00 511713 WOLFCOMP WOLF & COMPANY -24- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511713 WOLFCOMP WOLF & COMPANY 93390 07/26/11 01 FINANCE-PROGRESS BILLING FOR 01-120-54-00-5414 12,000.00 02 AUDIT FOR APRIL 30, 2011 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 12,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 12,000.00 511714 YBSD YORKVILLE BRISTOL 0551-008749721 06/30/11 01 WATER OP-JUNE'S FEES 51-510-56-00-5638 7,591.91 INVOICE TOTAL: 7,591.91 CHECK TOTAL: 7,591.91 511715 YORKCLER YORKVILLE CLERK'S ACCOUNT 147263 07/28/11 01 WATER OP-FILING WATER LIENS 51-510-54-00-5462 196.00 02 WATER OP-RELEASE WATER LIENS 51-510-54-00-5462 245.00 03 ADMIN-TAX LIEN RELEASE 01-110-54-00-5462 49.00 04 ENG-EASEMENTS 01-150-54-00-5462 98.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 588.00 CHECK TOTAL: 588.00 511716 YORKNAPA YORKVILLE NAPA AUTO PARTS 965163 06/06/11 01 STREETS-TURN SIGNAL BULB 01-410-54-00-5495 7.23 INVOICE TOTAL: 7.23 * 965634 06109111 01 STREETS-10 AIR FILTERS 01-410-54-00-5495 165.84 INVOICE TOTAL: 165.84 * 967208 06/22/11 01 STREETS-TRANS FLUID 01-410-54-00-5495 44.72 INVOICE TOTAL: 44.72 * 967774 06/27/11 01 STREETS-OIL 01-410-54-00-5495 33.54 INVOICE TOTAL: 33.54 * CHECK TOTAL: 251.33 -25- DATE: 08/02/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 26 TIME: 15:13:13 PRE-CHECK RUN EDIT ID: AP211001.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 08/09/2011 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 511717 YORKPDPC YORKVILLE POLICE DEPT. 072011 07/20/11 01 POLICE-WILL COUNTY NOTARY 01-210-56-00-5620 10.00 02 RECORDING FEE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10.00 CHECK TOTAL: 10.00 511718 YORKSELF YORKVILLE SELF STORAGE, INC 072511-45 07/25/11 01 POLICE-STORAGE 01-210-54-00-5485 75.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 75.00 CHECK TOTAL: 75.00 511719 YOUNGM MARLYS J. YOUNG 070511 07/18/11 01 ADMIN-JULY 5 MEETING MINUTES 01-110-54-00-5462 60.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 60.00 * 070711 07/22/11 01 ADMIN-JULY 7 MEETING MINUTES 01-110-54-00-5462 60.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 60.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 120.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 272,366.50 -26- UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY 7/30/2011 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS ADMINISTRATION 9,049.75 0.00 9,049.75 860.64 638.51 10,548.90 FINANCE 6,406.13 0.00 6,406.13 637.75 504.19 7,548.07 POLICE 68,458.45 2,927.25 71,385.70 311.92 5,246.50 76,944.12 COMMUNITY DEV. 4,384.80 0.00 4,384.80 416.99 324.35 5,126.14 STREETS 9,688.26 0.00 9,688.26 921.35 718.88 11,328.49 WATER 13,572.89 0.00 13,572.89 1,290.79 997.93 15,861.61 SEWER 7,129.16 0.00 7,129.16 677.97 523.82 8,330.95 PARKS 16,521.99 0.00 16,521.99 1,369.38 1 1,242.90 19,134.27 RECREATION 8,893.92 0.00 8,893.92 794.71 648.72 10,337.35 REC. CENTER 8,412.69 0.00 8,412.69 300.41 647.54 9,360.64 LIBRARY 16,718.55 0.00 16,718.55 1 889.50 1 1,251.19 18,859.24 TOTALS 169,236.59 2,927.25 172,163.84 1 8,471.41 12,744.53 193,379.78 TOTAL PAYROLL 7/30/2011 193,379.78 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 193,379.78 -27- UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE SUMMARY SHEET 8/9/2011 TOTAL PAYROLL 8/5/2011 $193,379.78 TOTAL MFT INVOICES 7/26/2011 $766.25 TOTAL INVOICES FY 12 7/26/2011 $272,366.50 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $466,512.53 -28- ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ CA#2 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Tracking Number W City Administrator ❑ °°°�^oygaa, �O Consultant ❑ Ke da fo ty EDC 2011-29 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Removal of SSAs from Undeveloped Portion of Grande Reserve Meeting and Date: City Council—08/09/2011 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 9/14/04 Action Taken: Approval of Ordinances Establishing SSA Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo from City Attorney Orr's office. LAW OFFICE KATHLEEN FIELD ORR&ASSOCIATES 53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 935 Chicago,Illinois 60604 (312)382-2113 (312)382-2127 facsimile KATHLEEN FIELD ORR JAMES W.BINNINGER kfo()kfoassoc.com jwb(&kfoassoc.com MEMORANDUM To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Jim Binninger, Attorney for the City Date: July 27, 2011 Subject: Termination of Special Service Areas 2004-105 and 103 In September of 2004, the City Council approved Ordinances 2004-50 and 2004-51 establishing special service areas for North Grande Reserve and South Grande Reserve. Both ordinances authorized the issuance of bonds in the amount of 20 million dollars for North Grande Reserve and 10 million dollars for South Grande Reserve at an interest rate not to exceed 9 percent. Both ordinances provided the same purpose statement that the bonds were to finance the cost of- ". . . engineering, soil testing and appurtenant work, mass grading and demolition, storm water management facilities, storm drainage systems and storm sewers, site clearing and tree removal, public water facilities, sanitary sewer facilities, erosion control measures, roads, streets, curbs, gutters, street lighting, traffic control, sidewalks, equestrian paths and related street improvements, and equipment and materials necessary for the maintenance thereof, public parks, park improvements, bicycle paths, landscaping, wetland mitigation and tree installation, costs for land and easement acquisitions relating to any of the foregoing improvements, required tap-on and related fees for water or sanitary sewer services and other eligible costs . . ." These costs were the public improvements required by the City's ordinances for the proposed residential development. Due to the developer's decision not to use the special service area as the funding source for the required infrastructure improvements for the limited development in Grande Reserve and the economic downturn in the housing market that has delayed any new development in both the South and North Grande Reserve, the developer has requested that the unused special service areas be repealed. The development in Grande reserve was done in compliance with the City's subdivision and engineering standards with the developer funding those required public improvements. The developer's infrastructure costs were and in the future will be included in the cost of the homes constructed. This reflects the new economic reality in the housing market that the concept of offsetting development costs by the use of a special service area so that the homeowner pays for the infrastructure by special service area taxes no longer encourages development. Homeowners in special service areas were often surprised by their much higher tax bill that would come the year after their purchase caused by the special service area taxes. To repeal a special service area the following factors must be reviewed; 1. Have any special services been provided? 2. Is the property currently benefited by the special service area? 3. Is it intended that the property be benefited by the special service area in the future? In both of these special service areas no special services were funded by the special service area and therefore no special service bonds were issued to pay for those improvements. All such costs were paid for by the developer and passed on to the purchaser of the homes that have been developed or will be developed in the future The repeal of the special service area does not affect the City's ordinance requirements which would still have to be met by the current or future developer. Construction of the public infrastructure must meet City requirements including letters of credit or bonds for their completion and guarantee period after acceptance by the City. The vacant property has therefore not received any special service area benefit nor will it in the future as those infrastructure improvements will have to be installed by the developer and the cost becoming a part of the purchase price of the home. The owner/developer of the property subject to these special service areas has requested their termination recognizing that he has paid for the existing improvements and in the future will pay for those future improvements. This will remove an encumbrance on the property which should improve marketability and therefore the future development of this property. I would therefore recommend the termination of both special service areas as the developer has chosen to proceed paying for pubic infrastructure improvements rather than use the funding option of the special service area. It will improve the development potential of the properties with the City still being able to obtain all required infrastructure improvements by enforcement of its engineering standards at the time of the development of the property. Ordinance No. 2011- AN ORDINANCE TERMINATING THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE'S SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 2004-103 NORTH GRANDE RESERVE AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-50 WHEREAS,the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the "City") is authorized, pursuant to Article VII, Section 7(6) of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and pursuant to the provisions of the Illinois Special Service Area Tax Law(35 ILCS 200/27-5 et seq.) to establish and terminate special service areas; and WHEREAS,the City established Special Service Area Number 2004-103 (the "Special Service Area")pursuant to Ordinance No. 2004-50, entitled,An Ordinance Establishing United City of Yorkville Special Service Area Number 2004-103 North Grande Reserve, adopted September 17, 2004; and WHEREAS,the Special Service Area included the contiguous territory legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 2004-50 was filed with the Kendall County Recorder on September 21, 2004 as document number 200400026262; and WHEREAS, no special City services nor improvements were constructed pursuant to the authority of Special Service Area Tax Law in the Special Service Area; and WHEREAS, no bonds have been issued to fund any improvements in the Special Service Area; and WHEREAS,the Special Service Area imposes a restriction on the title of all real property located within the Special Service Area described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS,the Mayor and City Council(the "Corporate Authorities") have determined that it is no longer in the best interests of the City that the Special Service Area continue as it is no longer necessary for the purposes for which it was established nor is it necessary to continue the Special Service Area as a restriction on the title of all real property in the Special Service Area restricting the ability of that property to develop. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That The Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville hereby find as facts all of the recitals in the preamble of this Ordinance and incorporate them as though fully set forth herein. Section 2. That Ordinance No. 2004-50, entitled,An Ordinance Establishing United City of Yorkville Special Service Area Number 2004-103 North Grande Reserve, be and is hereby repealed dissolving Special Service Area Number 2004-103. Section 3. That a certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the Kendall County Recorder. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , 2011. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2011. MAYOR 2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 Ordinance No. 2011- AN ORDINANCE TERMINATING THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE'S SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 2004-105 SOUTH GRANDE RESERVE AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-51 WHEREAS,the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the "City") is authorized, pursuant to Article VII, Section 7(6) of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and pursuant to the provisions of the Illinois Special Service Area Tax Law(35 ILCS 200/27-5 et seq.) to establish and terminate special service areas; and WHEREAS,the City established Special Service Area Number 2004-105 (the "Special Service Area")pursuant to Ordinance No. 2004-51, entitled,An Ordinance Establishing United City of Yorkville Special Service Area Number 2004-105 South Grande Reserve, adopted September 17, 2004; and WHEREAS,the Special Service Area included the contiguous territory legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 2004-51 was filed with the Kendall County Recorder on September 21, 2004 as document number 200400026253; and WHEREAS, no special City services nor improvements were constructed pursuant to the authority of Special Service Area Tax Law in the Special Service Area; and WHEREAS, no bonds have been issued to fund any improvements in the Special Service Area; and WHEREAS,the Special Service Area imposes a restriction on the title of all real property located within the Special Service Area described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS,the Mayor and City Council(the "Corporate Authorities") have determined that it is no longer in the best interests of the City that the Special Service Area continue as it is no longer necessary for the purposes for which it was established nor is it necessary to continue the Special Service Area as a restriction on the title of all real property in the Special Service Area restricting the ability of that property to develop. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That The Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville hereby find as facts all of the recitals in the preamble of this Ordinance and incorporate them as though fully set forth herein. Section 2. That Ordinance No. 2004-51, entitled, An Ordinance Establishing United City of Yorkville Special Service Area Number 2004-105 South Grande Reserve, be and is hereby repealed dissolving Special Service Area Number 2004-105. Section 3. That a certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the Kendall County Recorder. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , 2011. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2011. MAYOR 2 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION 3 � 1111111111111111 � 111111111111��.■■■■■■■■■■■■��■C =�•- r 111■ � 1111111 ■ I� /X11111// ■- --�- MM ■ � �■ �■■■■■■■■111■ ■■ ■ •■ � �,��11� X11111 1. /11111�11� 11111111111111111111►��- Q C : - I■ mom ■�■ ■■■■■■/� ? �■ == -�' ■ No son OEM "� X111/ i■■i Z ■ .� �►°�i4�+' 00 C�!=� �� Nonni ■■: ■ ■. �' Neighborhood � ■� ■■ � / o•.°�000a � •■ :. �� :■ ` �►�I�r/' �� -■ 000a ..o� ; -: —► ®` ® �® ��■.■ roc �-��. �®.��!�■■ iii■■■ ■ • • Neighborhood 2 • 0 Neigh�rhood 3 // Neighborhood Neighborhood V: � iii ��// a � • \`` , ' I _��/ ooap°cDO.a000�0000�cocoo � �� ■..■■.... -� i �/// Q°OQD��OQ•Oi�..e1r�D0aL�8 0�0 �� ■■■■■■■■■■' - � _ v oo d°COD �� ■■��■■■1�■. Neighborhood 7 0�QDODOO�QQ� �DQ��1 ■■■■�■ %� Neighborhood 6 - °OD . OOOOCGCGO� ■: �1■■■ ■ Q0a school n iivo_a ,1/® � ``� �,�Q Ne g�borhood{9� a ■ ,. .. , O. © prca iviv a■ ■■■ ` ®` ` �� 00 a�ago o O p� �■ irYi��■ . Neigh�o�rh�ood•160 0 OQO -- ■ ® , aro _o;r�o�a o s p pQ a °° �° 0 00 Co000o ■ ��'-� ■ iv v o daC00 00 ,� 7I ilii ,, v ovosav® � ■ ® , , • 4 eee o . ■ ■ I, , 4ed 0 0 �Neighabo�rhryood 1I � ■- ON ., ��rrr o® 97A ■, ■ ■ Legend ®�/�,�'®® •Neigh®®hood l5 r� '� : 1 �ANewh rhoodfl4�;®� Tp� C r� ■ •© zkh Status of Bank Owned Property 0� ®� Description Lots Rotar I Neighborhood 19 All UN T: . Bank Owned Property Neig 6or ood111 SSA Lots IIOOIIIV00 O a�DD � � ,. Oliloiuil v 4D o� Fully Improved Lots ' Ne0155rhood QNei hborhood413 ® ® �� Underground Mass Graded 0 Farm Land 1570 Parks 4EEED Fixed Rate SSAArea 001, Non Bank Owned Property o • d Detention/Passive Open Space NO RIM City Owned Parks ■. VA kv Roadway Improvements WM WAI unded by Fixed Rate Bonds WAR unded by Variable Rate Bonds AL I I 0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ CA#3 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Tracking Number W City Administrator ❑ °°�°o O Consultant ❑ Keda�v$ed� oty PS 2011-20 CE Chief of Police ■ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Police Reports June—July 2011 Meeting and Date: City Council 08/09/11 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PS 8/4/11 Action Taken: Consensus of committee for this item to move forward to 8/9/11 CC consent agenda. Item Number: PS 2011-20 Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Molly Schwartzkopf Police Name Department Agenda Item Notes: tK oYorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary June 20, 2011 through July 27, 2011 Report #11-1097 to #11-1379 Report# Date Offense Location 2011-00001097 06/20/2011 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 100 BLK. E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2011-00001098 06/20/2011 9061 - LOST ARTICLES 300 BLK. E.RIDGE STREET 2011-00001099 06/20/2011 8077-CHILD SAFETY SEAT CHECK DESK REPORT 2011-00001100 06/20/2011 9062 - FOUND ARTICLES 400 BLK. W.FOX STREET 2011-00001101 06/20/2011 5081 - IN-STATE WARRANT DESK REPORT 2011-00001102 06/20/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 3800 BLK. BAILEY ROAD 2011-00001103 06/20/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1500 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001104 06/21/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 600 BLK. TOWER LANE 2011-00001105 06/21/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY MARKETPLACE DRIVE/ROUTE 34 2011-00001106 06/21/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST 800 BLK. W.STAGECOACH TRAIL 2011-00001107 06/21/2011 9513-MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 4500 BLK. WINCHESTER LANE 2011-00001108 06/21/2011 9564-ACCIDENT - PROPERTY ROUTE 34/CANNONBALL TRAIL 2011-00001109 06/21/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 2200 BLK. LAVENDAR WAY 2011-00001110 06/21/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 600 BLK. E.COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY 2011-00001111 06/22/2011 1730-CURFEW 200 BLK. W.CENTER STREET 2011-00001112 06/22/2011 9562 -ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 47 2011-00001113 06/22/2011 2480 -SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL GALENA ROAD/ROSENWINKEL STREET 2011-00001114 06/22/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST DESK REPORT 2011-00001115 06/22/2011 2480 -SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL GALENA ROAD/ELDAMAIN ROAD 2011-00001116 06/22/2011 9513 - MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1400 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001117 06/22/2011 0860 - RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001118 06/22/2011 2410 -DUI -ALCOHOL 1100 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001119 06/23/2011 0760 -BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 1700 BLK. COTTONWOOD COURT 2011-00001120 06/23/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY CANNONBALL TRAIL/ROUTE 34 2011-00001121 06/23/2011 0760 - BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 1600 BLK. COTTONWOOD TRAIL 2011-00001122 06/23/2011 9231 - DOGS -AT LARGE 600 BLK. ARROWHEAD DRIVE 2011-00001123 06/23/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST ROUTE 34/GAME FARM ROAD 2011-00001124 06/23/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1400 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001125 06/23/2011 0860 - RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001126 06/23/2011 5081 - IN-STATE WARRANT 9100 BLK. ROUTE 34 2011-00001127 06/24/2011 8077-CHILD SAFETY SEAT CHECK DESK REPORT 2011-00001128 06/24/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 2011-00001129 06/24/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2011-00001130 06/24/2011 8041 -ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN 1800 BLK. COUNTRY HILLS DRIVE 2011-00001131 06/25/2011 9569 -ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 100 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001132 06/25/2011 9020 -SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 700 BLK. EDWARD LANE 2011-00001133 06/25/2011 9513-MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1200 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001134 06/25/2011 9061 - LOST ARTICLES 400 BLK. W.VAN EMMON STREET 2011-00001135 06/25/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 0 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001136 06/26/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ELDAMAIN ROAD/ROUTE 34 2011-00001137 06/26/2011 9564-ACCIDENT - PROPERTY ROUTE 47/W.WHEATON AVENUE 2011-00001138 06/26/2011 9562 -ACCIDENT- INJURY 1800 BLK. MARKETVIEW DRIVE 2011-00001139 06/26/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 600 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 1 of 7 r Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary gW June 20, 2011 through July 27, 2011 L E Report #11-1097 to #11-1379 'r Report# Date Offense Location 2011-00001140 06/26/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 800 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001141 06/26/2011 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 1200 BLK. CHESTNUT LANE 2011-00001142 06/26/2011 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 100 BLK. APPLETREE COURT 2011-00001143 06/27/2011 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 126/MILL STREET 2011-00001144 06/27/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/ROUTE 71 2011-00001145 06/2712011 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL CANNONBALL TRAIL/BOOMER LANE 2011-00001146 06/27/2011 9063- LOST/STOLEN DUPLATES 300 BLK. PENSACOLA STREET 2011-00001147 06/27/2011 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001148 06/27/2011 1130- FRAUD 200 BLK. ELIZABETH STREET 2011-00001149 06/27/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/MCHUGH ROAD 2011-00001150 06/27/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1400 BLK. ORCHID STREET 2011-00001151 06/27/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST DESK REPORT 2011-00001152 06/28/2011 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL E.ORANGE STREET/HEUSTIS STREET 2011-00001153 06/28/2011 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 200 BLK. BARRETT DRIVE 2011-00001154 06/28/2011 1120- FORGERY 1400 BLK.ASPEN LANE 2011-00001155 06/28/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/RIVER STREET 2011-00001156 06/28/2011 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 2011-00001157 06/28/2011 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 47/W.FOX STREET 2011-00001158 06/28/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 800 BLK. PRAIRIE CROSSING DRIVE 2011-00001159 06/28/2011 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY GALENA ROAD/N.ROUTE 47 2011-00001160 06/28/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 600 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001161 06/28/2011 9569 -ACCIDENT-PRIVATE PROP 4000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001162 06/28/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 2011-00001163 06/29/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY LANDMARK AVENUE/N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001164 06/29/2011 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 1500 BLK. ORCHID STREET 2011-00001165 06/29/2011 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001166 06/29/2011 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 47/CORNEILS ROAD 2011-00001167 06/29/2011 8041 -ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN 200 BLK. S.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001168 06/29/2011 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 200 BLK. HILLCREST AVENUE 2011-00001169 06/30/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1500 BLK. SYCAMORE ROAD 2011-00001170 06/30/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY W.FOX STREET/ROUTE 47 2011-00001171 06/30/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST 800 BLK. PARKSIDE LANE 2011-00001172 06/30/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1100 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001173 06/30/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 600 BLK. CENTER PARKWAY 2011-00001174 06/30/2011 9061 - LOST ARTICLES DESK REPORT 2011-00001175 06/30/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2011-00001176 06/30/2011 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2011-00001177 06/30/2011 9513-MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 700 BLK. GAME FARM ROAD 2011-00001178 06/30/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY BOULEVARD 2011-00001179 06/30/2011 9212-ANIMAL-SICK/INJURED BOULEVARD 2011-00001180 06/30/2011 9001 -ASSIST CITY FIRE DEPT 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 2011-00001181 07/01/2011 1310 -CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 300 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001182 07/01/2011 2170-POSS DRUG EQUIPMENT SCHOOLHOUSE ROAD/ROUTE 47 2of7 Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary FL June 20, 2011 through July 27, 2011 Report #11-1097 to #11-1379 Report# Date Offense Location 2011-00001183 07/01/2011 5081 - IN-STATE WARRANT CHESTNUT LANE/CHESTNUT CIRCLE 2011-00001184 07/01/2011 0860 - RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001185 07/01/2011 0820 -THEFT UNDER 4000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001186 07/01/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 800 BLK. W.JOHN STREET 2011-00001187 07/01/2011 0820-THEFT UNDER 200 BLK. GREENBRIAR ROAD 2011-00001188 07/01/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 10000 BLK. GALENA ROAD 2011-00001189 07/01/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.000NTRYSIDE PARKWAY 2011-00001190 07/01/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.SOMONAUK STREET 2011-00001191 07/01/2011 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001192 07/01/2011 0860- RETAIL THEFT 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2011-00001193 07/02/2011 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 71/W.HIGHPOINT ROAD 2011-00001194 07/02/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/ROUTE 30 2011-00001195 07/02/2011 2470- NO DRIVER'S LICENSE ROUTE 71/SLEEPY HOLLOW ROAD 2011-00001196 07/02/2011 9431 - DEATH - NATURAL CAUSES 200 BLK. S.STATE STREET 2011-00001197 07/02/2011 5081 - IN-STATE WARRANT 200 BLK. S.STATE STREET 2011-00001198 07/02/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/RIVER STREET 2011-00001199 07/02/2011 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001200 07/02/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 300 BLK. E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2011-00001201 07/02/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2011-00001202 07/02/2011 3000- FIREWORKS 900 BLK. WESTERN LANE 2011-00001203 07/02/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001204 07/03/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 600 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001205 07/03/2011 8041 -ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN 200 BLK. SPRUCE COURT 2011-00001206 07/04/2011 1563-CRIMINAL SEXUAL ABUSE 500 BLK. BURNING BUSH DRIVE 2011-00001207 07/04/2011 1130- FRAUD 200 BLK. LEISURE STREET 2011-00001208 07/04/2011 2410- DUI -ALCOHOL ROUTE 126/IDENTA ROAD 2011-00001209 07/04/2011 0486-DOMESTIC BATTERY 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2011-00001210 07/04/2011 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL BOULEVARD 2011-00001211 07/04/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 600 BLK. HAYDEN DRIVE 2011-00001212 07/04/2011 9562 -ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 34/N.BEECHER ROAD 2011-00001213 07/05/2011 0261 -AGG CRIM SEXUAL ASSAULT WALSH DRIVE/SUNFLOWER COURT 2011-00001214 07/05/2011 0760 - BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 100 BLK. COLONIAL PARKWAY 2011-00001215 07/05/2011 8077-CHILD SAFETY SEAT CHECK DESK REPORT 2011-00001216 07/05/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST DESK REPORT 2011-00001217 07/05/2011 9562 -ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2011-00001218 07/05/2011 8041 -ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN 9000 BLK. KENNEDY ROAD 2011-00001219 07/05/2011 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001220 07/05/2011 0860- RETAIL THEFT 1600 BLK. N.BEECHER ROAD 2011-00001221 07/06/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 300 BLK. E.KENDALL DRIVE 2011-00001222 07/06/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 2300 BLK. IROQUOIS LANE 2011-00001223 07/06/2011 8077- CHILD SAFETY SEAT CHECK DESK REPORT 2011-00001224 07/06/2011 1150-CREDIT CARD FRAUD 400 BLK. E.BARBERRY CIRCLE 2011-00001225 07/06/2011 9776-ASSIST DCFS 300 BLK. MULHERN COURT 3of7 Y Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary 6 K June 20, 2011 through July 27, 2011 � L Report #11-1097 to #11-1379 F .r Report# Date Offense Location 2011-00001226 07/06/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 700 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001227 07/06/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 600 BLK. WINDETT RIDGE ROAD 2011-00001228 07/07/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST 100 BLK. COLONIAL PARKWAY 2011-00001229 07/06/2011 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 47/E.FOX STREET 2011-00001230 07/06/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 100 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE 2011-00001231 07/07/2011 9205-OTHER ANIMAL BITES-HOME 2500 BLK. LYMAN LOOP 2011-00001232 07/07/2011 5081 - IN-STATE WARRANT 2500 BLK. LYMAN LOOP 2011-00001233 07/07/2011 2470- NO DRIVER'S LICENSE ROUTE 34/ISABEL DRIVE 2011-00001234 07/07/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY PARKWAY 2011-00001235 07/07/2011 9062- FOUND ARTICLES 200 BLK. E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2011-00001236 07/09/2011 0625- RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY 300 BLK. W.WASHINGTON STREET 2011-00001237 07/08/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST DESK REPORT 2011-00001238 07/08/2011 9569-ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 100 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001239 07/08/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2011-00001240 07/08/2011 9020 -SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 500 BLK. FREEMONT STREET 2011-00001241 07/08/2011 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 34/SYCAMORE ROAD 2011-00001242 07/08/2011 9569-ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 1200 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001243 07/09/2011 2470- NO DRIVER'S LICENSE ROUTE 47/E.WASHINGTON STREET 2011-00001244 07/09/2011 9062- FOUND ARTICLES 200 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001245 07/09/2011 8041 -ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN 4000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001246 07/09/2011 8077-CHILD SAFETY SEAT CHECK DESK REPORT 2011-00001247 07/10/2011 1811 - POSS CANNABIS <30 GRAMS 2000 BLK. S.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001248 07/10/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/SARAVANOS ROAD 2011-00001249 07/10/2011 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2011-00001250 07/10/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 4000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001251 07/10/2011 9513-MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 100 BLK. BERTRAM DRIVE 2011-00001252 07/11/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY LANE 2011-00001253 07/11/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/LANDMARK AVENUE 2011-00001254 07/11/2011 9562-ACCIDENT- INJURY ROUTE 47/GALENA ROAD 2011-00001255 07/11/2011 8077-CHILD SAFETY SEAT CHECK DESK REPORT 2011-00001256 07/11/2011 2480 -SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 47/E.ORANGE STREET 2011-00001257 07/11/2011 2890 -ALL OTHER DISORDERLY COND 500 BLK. S.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001258 07/12/2011 0760 - BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 300 BLK. COLTON STREET 2011-00001259 06/02/2011 1150 -CREDIT CARD FRAUD 600 BLK. CENTER PARKWAY 2011-00001260 07/12/2011 8077-CHILD SAFETY SEAT CHECK DESK REPORT 2011-00001261 07/12/2011 2480 -SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 126/IDENTA ROAD 2011-00001262 07/12/2011 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 800 BLK. PARKSIDE LANE 2011-00001263 07/12/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/E.CENTER STREET 2011-00001264 07/12/2011 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 400 BLK. COLTON STREET 2011-00001265 07/12/2011 9071 - CITIZEN ASSIST DESK REPORT 2011-00001266 07/12/2011 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 500 BLK. S.MAIN STREET 2011-00001267 07/12/2011 9915-ASSISTANCE CIVIL CATEGORY 3800 BLK. BAILEY ROAD 2011-00001268 07/12/2011 0460- BATTERY STREET 4 of 7 Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary K June 20, 2011 through July 27, 2011 Report #11-1097 to #11-1379 'r Report# Date Offense Location 2011-00001269 07/12/2011 2410- DUI -ALCOHOL ROUTE 47/CANNONBALL TRAIL 2011-00001270 07/13/2011 8077-CHILD SAFETY SEAT CHECK DESK REPORT 2011-00001271 07/13/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 500 BLK. W.BARBERRY CIRCLE 2011-00001272 07/13/2011 9564-ACCIDENT - PROPERTY ROUTE 34/MCHUGH ROAD 2011-00001273 07/13/2011 2825- HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE 1200 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2011-00001274 07/13/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST DESK REPORT 2011-00001275 07/13/2011 1310 -CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 1000 BLK. &BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001276 07/13/2011 9562-ACCIDENT - INJURY ROUTE 34/TIMBER RIDGE DRIVE 2011-00001277 07/13/2011 9070 -DISORDERLY/RECKLESS COND 1900 BLK. &BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001278 07/14/2011 1360 -CRIM TRESPASS VEHICLE 500 BLK. W.BLAINE STREET 2011-00001279 07/14/2011 0910 - MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT 400 BLK. W.BLAINE STREET 2011-00001280 07/14/2011 0760 - BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 900 BLK. MORGAN STREET 2011-00001281 07/14/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 2900 BLK. ELLSWORTH DRIVE 2011-00001282 07/14/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST DESK REPORT 2011-00001283 07/14/2011 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 300 BLK. W.RIDGE STREET 2011-00001284 07/15/2011 9915-ASSISTANCE CIVIL CATEGORY 3800 BLK. BAILEY ROAD 2011-00001285 07/15/2011 9569 -ACCIDENT - PRIVATE PROP 2000 BLK. &BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001286 07/15/2011 1150-CREDIT CARD FRAUD 600 BLK. OMAHA DRIVE 2011-00001287 07/15/2011 9061 - LOST ARTICLES 1400 BLK. ASPEN LANE 2011-00001288 07/15/2011 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2011-00001289 07/15/2011 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY DESK REPORT 2011-00001290 07/15/2011 4870 - DOMESTIC DISPUTE 600 BLK. DENISE COURT 2011-00001291 07/16/2011 9564-ACCIDENT - PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ELDAMAIN ROAD 2011-00001292 07/15/2011 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 200 BLK. WALSH CIRCLE 2011-00001293 07/15/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 200 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001294 07/16/2011 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 34/CENTER PARKWAY 2011-00001295 07/16/2011 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 400 BLK. E.KENDALL DRIVE 2011-00001296 07/16/2011 9915-ASSISTANCE CIVIL CATEGORY 800 BLK. PARKSIDE LANE 2011-00001297 07/17/2011 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 1700 BLK. COTTONWOOD COURT 2011-00001298 07/17/2011 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 1400 BLK.ASPEN LANE 2011-00001299 07/17/2011 0625- RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY 1000 BLK. S.MAIN STREET 2011-00001300 07/17/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 2500 BLK. ELLSWORTH DRIVE 2011-00001301 07/17/2011 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 400 BLK. E.SPRING STREET 2011-00001302 07/17/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2011-00001303 07/17/2011 0810-THEFT OVER 4500 BLK. MARQUETTE STREET 2011-00001304 07/18/2011 0460- BATTERY 300 BLK. HEUSTIS STREET 2011-00001305 07/18/2011 9564-ACCIDENT - PROPERTY 11000 BLK. FOX ROAD 2011-00001306 07/18/2011 9564-ACCIDENT - PROPERTY ROUTE 47/FOUNTAINVIEW DRIVE 2011-00001307 07/18/2011 9564-ACCIDENT - PROPERTY 100 BLK. E.STAGECOACH TRAIL 2011-00001308 07/18/2011 0820-THEFT UNDER 1700 BLK. COLUMBINE COURT 2011-00001309 07/18/2011 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 1700 BLK. COLUMBINE COURT 2011-00001310 07/18/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 4000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001311 07/18/2011 9569-ACCIDENT- PRIVATE PROP 1200 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 5 of 7 � . Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary y 'V June 20, 2011 through July 27, 2011 Report #11-1097 to #11-1379 Report# Date Offense Location 2011-00001312 07/19/2011 1310 -CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 4500 BLK. ROSENWINKEL STREET 2011-00001313 07/19/2011 2220 - ILLEGAL POSS ALCOHOL 300 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001314 07/19/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 126/ROUTE 71 2011-00001315 07/19/2011 0820 -THEFT UNDER 300 BLK. E.RIDGE STREET 2011-00001316 07/19/2011 0820 -THEFT UNDER 4000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001317 07/19/2011 0820-THEFT UNDER 4000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001318 07/19/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 300 BLK. E.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001319 07/19/2011 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 200 BLK. WALSH CIRCLE 2011-00001320 07/20/2011 0460 - BATTERY 400 BLK. W.RIDGE STREET 2011-00001321 07/19/2011 9076 - SUBPOENAS/OTHER PAPERS 1200 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2011-00001322 07/20/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY E.000NTRYSIDE PARKWAY/ROUTE 47 2011-00001323 07/20/2011 0820 -THEFT UNDER 500 BLK. W.BARBERRY CIRCLE 2011-00001324 07/20/2011 2020 - POSS CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE 900 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001325 07/20/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 2700 BLK. CRANSTON CIRCLE 2011-00001326 07/20/2011 1130- FRAUD 1200 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2011-00001327 07/20/2011 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST 2400 BLK. CATALPA TRAIL 2011-00001328 07/21/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 400 BLK. E.SPRING STREET 2011-00001329 07/21/2011 1310 -CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 100 BLK. E.PARK STREET 2011-00001330 07/21/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY BOULEVARD 2011-00001331 07/21/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/CENTER PARKWAY 2011-00001332 07/21/2011 1330 -CRIM TRESPASS REAL PROP 1700 BLK. JOHN STREET 2011-00001333 07/21/2011 9020 -SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 200 BLK. WALSH CIRCLE 2011-00001334 07/21/2011 0810 -THEFT OVER 200 BLK. WALSH CIRCLE 2011-00001335 07/22/2011 9071 - CITIZEN ASSIST DESK REPORT 2011-00001336 07/22/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 400 BLK. E.PARK STREET 2011-00001337 07/22/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/CANNONBALL TRAIL 2011-00001338 07/22/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY STAGECOACH TRAIL/WALNUT DRIVE 2011-00001339 07/22/2011 2220- ILLEGAL POSS ALCOHOL ROUTE 47/RIVER STREET 2011-00001340 07/22/2011 9439- DEATH -OTHER 500 BLK. MORGAN STREET 2011-00001341 07/23/2011 0486- DOMESTIC BATTERY 100 BLK. WILLOUGHBY COURT 2011-00001342 07/23/2011 0625- RESIDENTIAL BURGLARY 1000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001343 07/23/2011 9068- FOUND BICYCLE 0 BLK. E.SCHOOLHOUSE ROAD 2011-00001344 07/23/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 4000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001345 07/23/2011 9071 - CITIZEN ASSIST DESK REPORT 2011-00001346 07/23/2011 0860- RETAIL THEFT 900 BLK. ERICA LANE 2011-00001347 07/23/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 4000 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001348 07/24/2011 0486 - DOMESTIC BATTERY 1200 BLK SUNSET AVENUE 2011-00001349 07/23/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1800 BLK. MARKETVIEW DRIVE 2011-00001350 07/24/2011 1310 -CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 300 BLK. E.ORANGE STREET 2011-00001351 07/24/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/ROUTE 30 2011-00001352 07/24/2011 8041 -ACCIDENT- HIT AND RUN ROUTE 34/N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001353 07/24/2011 5081 - IN-STATE WARRANT 1500 BLK. SYCAMORE ROAD 2011-00001354 07/24/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 4000 BLK. BRADY STREET 6 of 7 Yorkville Police Department Incident Report Summary June 20, 2011 through July 27, 2011 rL Report #11-1097 to #11-1379 E Report# Date Offense Location 2011-00001355 07/24/2011 2210 -SALE LIQUOR MINOR/DRUNK 400 BLK. W.WASHINGTON STREET 2011-00001356 07/24/2011 2825- HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE 300 BLK. E.KENDALL DRIVE 2011-00001357 07/25/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1500 BLK. SYCAMORE ROAD 2011-00001358 07/25/2011 9915-ASSISTANCE CIVIL CATEGORY 9200 BLK. GALENA ROAD 2011-00001359 07/25/2011 5081 - IN-STATE WARRANT 500 BLK. POWERS COURT 2011-00001360 07/25/2011 1150 -CREDIT CARD FRAUD 300 BLK. CANDLEBERRY COURT 2011-00001361 07/25/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY 0 BLK. W.COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY 2011-00001362 07/26/2011 0486 -DOMESTIC BATTERY 4500 BLK. GARRITANO STREET 2011-00001363 07/26/2011 4870- DOMESTIC DISPUTE 300 BLK. E.RIDGE STREET 2011-00001364 07/26/2011 1310 -CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 4600 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001365 07/26/2011 2825- HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE 1200 BLK. MARKETPLACE DRIVE 2011-00001366 07/26/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 47/GALENA ROAD 2011-00001367 07/26/2011 0610-BURGLARY 500 BLK. W.HYDRAULIC AVENUE 2011-00001368 07/26/2011 0860 -RETAIL THEFT 1500 BLK. SYCAMORE ROAD 2011-00001369 07/27/2011 2480 -SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL ROUTE 47/LANDMARK AVENUE 2011-00001370 07/27/2011 8077-CHILD SAFETY SEAT CHECK DESK REPORT 2011-00001371 07/27/2011 0710-THEFT FROM MOTOR VEHICLE 500 BLK. KELLY AVENUE 2011-00001372 07/27/2011 0610- BURGLARY 300 BLK. EVAN EMMON STREET 2011-00001373 07/27/2011 1120- FORGERY 200 BLK. GREENBRIAR ROAD 2011-00001374 07/27/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 600 BLK. N.BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001375 07/27/2011 9564-ACCIDENT- PROPERTY ROUTE 34/ROUTE 47 2011-00001376 07/27/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1500 BLK. STONERIDGE CIRCLE 2011-00001377 07/27/2011 9513-MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 600 BLK. W.VETERANS PARKWAY 2011-00001378 07/27/2011 9513- MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 1200 BLK. &BRIDGE STREET 2011-00001379 07/27/2011 0760- BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 500 BLK. W.WASHINGTON STREET 7 of 7 Incident Breakdown By Month Report Print Date/Time: 071281201111:59 YORKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT Login ID: mschwatkopf ORI Number: IL0470200 Year: 2011 Incident Type: All January February March April May June July August September October November December Yearly Incident Type # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Totals 0261-AGG CRIM 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0310-ARMED R 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0320-ROBBERY 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0460-BATTERY 21 11.81 01 0.0 4 23.5 2 11.8 51 29.4 1 5.9 3 17.6 0 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 01 0.0 17 0486-DOMESTIC 6 15.8 4 10.5 5 13.2 2 5.3 7 18.4 6 15.8 8 21.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 38 0510-AGGRAVA 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0560-ASSAULT 2 66.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 0610-BURGLAR 01 0.0 0 0.0 2 33.3 01 0.0 2 33.3 2 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 01 0.0 6 0625-RESIDENTI 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 40.0 1 10.0 2 20.0 0 0.0 3 30.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 0710-THEFT FR 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 1 50.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 0730-BURGLAR 1 100.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0760-BURGLAR 1 3.7 1 3.7 2 7.4 2 7.4 3 11.1 11 40.7 7 25.9 0 0.01 01 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.01 01 0.0 27 0810-THEFT OV 2 15.4 3 23.1 3 23.1 2 15.4 1 7.7 0 0.0 2 15.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 13 0820-THEFT UN 4 12.5 3 9.4 3 9.4 8 25.0 3 9.4 5 15.61 61 18.8 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 32 0860-RETAIL TH 2 6.3 21 6.31 0 0.0 4 12.5 81 25.01 8 25.0 8 25.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 32 0910-MOTOR VE 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 01 0.0 2 1010-ARSON 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1110-DECEPTIV 1 16.7 1 16.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 33.3 2 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 1120-FORGERY 1 25.0 01 0.01 1 25.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 1 25.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 1130-FRAUD 1 8.3 1 8.3 3 25.0 21 16.7 2 16.7 1 8.3 2 16.7 0 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.01 01 0.0 12 1137-IDENTITY 0 0.0 1 1 14.3 2 28.6 3 42.9 0 0.0 1 14.3 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 1150-CREDIT C 3 21.4 3 21.4 3 21.4 1 7.1 0 0.0 1 7.1 3 21.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 14 1305-CRIMINAL 0 0.0 01 0.01 1 100.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1310-CRIMINAL 3 9.1 2 6.1 4 12.1 41 12.1 8 24.2 5 15.2 7 21.2 0 0.01 01 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 01 0.0 33 1330-CRIM THE 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 1360-CRIM THE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1365-CRIM THE 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 1380-UNAUTH P 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.01 0 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.01 01 0.0 2 Page:1 of 4 Incident Breakdown By Month Report Print Date/Time: 071281201111:59 YORKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT Login ID: mschwatkopf ORI Number: IL0470200 Year: 2011 Incident Type: All January February March April May June July August September October November December Yearly Incident Type # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Totals 1460-NO FOID C 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1477-RECK DIS 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.01 1 1563-CRIMINAL 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1570-PUBLIC IN 1 100.0 01 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1720-CONTRIBU 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1730-CURFEW 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 2 1740-RUNAWAY 2 25.0 1 12.5 2 25.0 3 37.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 8 1811-POSS CAN 4 26.7 0 0.0 3 20.01 21 13.3 4 26.7 1 6.7 1 6.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 15 2020-POSS CON 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 33.3 1 33.3 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 2170-POSS DRU 3 33.3 1 11.1 0 0.0 2 22.2 21 22.21 0 0.0 1 11.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 9 2210-SALE LIQU 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.01 0 0.01 01 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 2220-ILLEGAL P 01 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.01 01 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 2 66.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 2230-ILLEGAL C 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 2410-DUI-ALCO 3 20.0 1 6.7 2 13.3 0 0.0 21 113.31 5 33.3 2 13.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 15 2420-DUI-DRU 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 2470-NO DRIVE 71 35.0 41 20.01 1 5.01 31 15.0 1 5.0 1 5.0 3 15.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 20 2480-SUSPEND 11 20.4 6 11.1 4 7.4 9 16.7 6 11.1 13 24.1 5 9.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 54 2485-DRIVERIP 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 1 2820-TELEPHO 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 33.3 1 33.3 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 2825-HARASSM 1 12.5 01 0.01 1 12.51 1 12.5 1 12.5 1 12.5 3 37.5 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 8 2890-ALL OTHE 2 20.0 0 0.0 3 30.0 2 20.0 1 10.0 1 10.0 1 10.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 3000-FIREWOR 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 01 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 o.ol 0 0.oj 1 3710-RESIST/013 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 3960-INTIMIDATI 1 100.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 4387-VIOL ORD 1 50.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 2 4525-SEX OFFE 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 4870 DOMESTIC 6 26.1 2 8.7 3 13.0 0 0.0 5 21.7 4 17.4 3 13.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 23 5000 ALL OTHE 1 25.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 1 25.0 1 25.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 Page:2 of 4 Incident Breakdown By Month Report Print Date/Time: 071281201111:59 YORKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT Login ID: mschwatkopf ORI Number: IL0470200 Year: 2011 Incident Type: All January February March April May June July August September October November December Yearly Incident Type # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Totals 5081-IN-STATE 8 20.5 4 10.3 6 15.4 4 10.3 6 15.4 6 15.4 5 12.8 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 39 6601-SPEEDING 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 8007-ASSIST PL 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 8041-ACCIDENT 61 30.0 1 5.0 3 15.01 1 5.0 1 5.01 41 20.01 4 20.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.01 01 0.0 20 8066-CRIMINAL 1 50.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 8077-CHILD SAF 4 8.1 5 10.9 10 21.7 5 10.9 7 15.2 8 17.4 7 15.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 46 9001-ASSIST CI 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 9002-ASSIST CO 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 11 50.01 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 2 9004-ASSIST OT 1 33.3 1 33.3 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 9005-ASSIST G 5 21.7 21 8.71 2 8.71 2 8.7 6 26.1 3 13.0 3 13.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 23 9008-ASSIST BU 1 33.3 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 9009-ASSIST SC 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 1 50.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.01 01 0.0 2 9020-SUSPICIO 2 11.1 0 0.0 3 16.7 2 11.1 3 16.7 6 33.3 2 11.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 18 9023-BUSINESS 0 0.0 01 0.01 1 100.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9039-OTHER PU 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 01 0.01 0 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 9059-OTHER PU 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 01 0.0 2 9060-SEX OFFE 2 20.0 4 40.0 4 40.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 9061-LOST ARTI 0 0.0 01 0.01 2 28.61 1 14.3 0 0.0 3 42.9 1 14.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 7 9062-FOUND AR 2 20.0 0 0.0 1 10.0 0 0.0 2 20.0 3 30.0 21 20.01 0 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 9063-LOSTISTO 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 33.31 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 01 0.0 3 9064-MISSING- 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9065-MISSING- 0 0.0 01 0.01 1 50.01 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 9068-FOUND BI 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9070-DISORDER 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 1 9071-CITIZEN A 5 13.9 5 13.9 3 8.3 6 16.7 9 25.0 6 16.7 2 5.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 36 9076-SUBPOEN 0 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9080-TOWED VE 0 0.0 1 25.0 1 25.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 1 25.0 0 0.01 0 0.01 01 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0:d23 9083-ASSIST AM 1 4.3 4 17.4 6 26.1 4 17.4 2 8.7 4 17.4 2 8.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 Page:3 of 4 Incident Breakdown By Month Report Print Date/Time: 071281201111:59 YORKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT Login ID: mschwarfzkopf ORI Number: IL0470200 Year: 2011 Incident Type: All January February March April May June July August September October November December Yearly Incident Type # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % # % Totals 9091-REPOSSE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9103-SUSPICIO 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9105-NEIGHBOR 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 9110-DISTURBA 01 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 01 0.0 1 9203-DOG BITE 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 25.0 1 25.0 2 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 9205-OTHER AN 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9212-ANIMAL-S 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 9219-ANIMAL- 01 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 01 0.oj 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 1 9230-ANIMAL-C 1 50.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 9231-DOGS-AT 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 ol 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9409-INVESTIGA 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9431-DEATH-N 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.01 01 0.0 3 9439-DEATH-0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9513-MOTORIST 45 14.6 44 14.2 47 15.2 40 12.9 54 17.5 50 16.2 29 9.41 0 0.01 01 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 309 9515-MOTORIST 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9519-ABANDON 0 0.0 2 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 2 9562-ACCIDENT 5 11.4 5 11.4 6 13.61 71 15.9 5 11.4 9 20.5 7 15.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 44 9564-ACCIDENT 22 10.3 32 15.0 23 10.8 23 10.8 421 19.71 43 20.2 28 13.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 213 9569-ACCIDENT 5 20.0 41 16.01 4 16.0 4 16.0 1 4.0 3 12.0 41 16.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 25 9700-VOIDED TI 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 o.ol 0 o.ol 0 0.0 01 0.0 1 9776-ASSIST DC 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9820-TOBACCO 0 0.0 1 12.5 6 75.0 0 0.0 1 12.51 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 8 9907-DOGS-LE 0 0.0 01 0.01 1 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 0 0.01 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9915-ASSISTAN 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 12.5 0 0.0 2 25.0 1 12.5 4 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 01 0.01 0 0.0 8 9999-SPECIAL N 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 100.0 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.01 1 Total: 195 14.3 164 12.0 195 14.3 170 12.4 221 16.2 235 17.2 187 13.7 01 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1367 Page:4 of 4 Incident Analysis Report Summary By Incident Type Print Date/Time: 07/28/2011 12:02 YORKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT Login ID: mschwartzkopf From Date: 06/01/2011 00:00 ORI Number: IL0470200 Incident Type: All To Date: 06/30/201123:59 Officer ID: All Call Source: All Location: All Incident Type Number of Incidents 0320-ROBBERY 1 0460-BATTERY 1 0486-DOMESTIC BATTERY 6 0560-ASSAULT 1 0610-BURGLARY 2 0760-BURGLARY FROM VEHICLE 11 0820-THEFT UNDER 5 0860-RETAIL THEFT 8 1110-DECEPTIVE PRACTICES 2 1120-FORGERY 1 1130-FRAUD 1 1137-IDENTITY THEFT 1 1150-CREDIT CARD FRAUD 1 1310-CRIMINAL DAMAGE PROPERTY 5 1365-CRIM TRESPASS RESIDENCE 1 1730-CURFEW 1 1811 -POSS CANNABIS<30 GRAMS 1 2230-ILLEGAL CONSUMPTION 1 2410-DUI-ALCOHOL 5 2470-NO DRIVER'S LICENSE 1 2480-SUSPENDED/REVOKED DL 13 2820-TELEPHONE THREAT 1 2825-HARASSMENT BY TELEPHONE 1 2890-ALL OTHER DISORDERLY COND 1 3710-RESIST/OBSTRUCT/DISARM 1 4870-DOMESTIC DISPUTE 4 5081-IN-STATE WARRANT 6 8041 -ACCIDENT-HIT AND RUN 4 8077-CHILD SAFETY SEAT CHECK 8 9001 -ASSIST CITY FIRE DEPT 1 9005-ASSIST GOVERNMENT AGENCY 3 9020-SUSPICIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES 6 9039-OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE 1 9061 -LOST ARTICLES 3 9062-FOUND ARTICLES 3 9063-LOST/STOLEN DUPLATES 1 9071 -CITIZEN ASSIST 6 9080-TOWED VEHICLE 1 9083-ASSIST AMBULANCE 4 9203-DOG BITE-PUBLIC 2 9212-ANIMAL-SICK/INJURED 1 Paae: 1 of 2 Incident Analysis Report Summary By Incident Type Print Date/Time: 07/28/2011 12:02 YORKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT Login ID: mschwartzkopf From Date: 06/01/201100:00 ORI Number: IL0470200 Incident Type: All To Date: 06/30/201123:59 Call Source: All Officer ID: All Location: All Incident Type Number of Incidents 9219-ANIMAL-OTHER COMPLAINTS 1 9231 -DOGS-AT LARGE 1 9513-MOTORIST ASSIST-LOCKOUT 50 9562-ACCIDENT-INJURY 9 9564-ACCIDENT-PROPERTY 43 9569-ACCIDENT-PRIVATE PROP 3 9915-ASSISTANCE CIVIL CATEGORY 1 Total: 235 Paae:2 of 2 Yorkville Police Department - Overtime Manhour Utilization Report - July 16, 2011 This report is based on hours paid out per payroll period (bi-weekly). Does not include overtime taken as compensatory time. Date Court Training I Relief I Details I Admin I Emerg I Invest I OIC Pay FCOMM. Full Time Part Time 05/07/11 6.00: 17.75 10.001 0.001 0.00. 37.50 7.75 12.00: 1. 2.00 93.00 _ 198.50 _05%21/11 4.00 8.00 40.00 1 0.001 0.00. 0.00 16.00!: 8„00: 6.00 82.00 197.25 06/04/11 4.00: 0.00 0.00 4.001 0.00 3.00 27.75 4.00; 0.00 42.75 150.00 T 13.50 7.50_: 26.00 7.001 0.00 0.00 1.25;. 8.00: 0.00 63.25 143.50 07/02/11 9.50 0.00_ 0.001-20.00; 6.00 0.00 1.75 10.001 0.00 .,� 47.25 170.00 07%16/11„ _,0.00 0.00 39.75 i 15.00 0.00 0.00 20.50' 4.00: 0.00 79.25 226.25 0.00 i 0.00 i - 0.00 _ ---'- ---- 0.00 . k i ! 0.00 0.00 0.00 , 0.00 ! 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 o.00 _-- -_ i 0.00 - } _"0'.00 I ! 0.00 0.00 1- 0.00 _.._........ _ 0.00 FY10 11 Court Training Relief Details Admin Emerg Invest OICPay Comm. Full Time Part Time Totals 37.00 33.25 105.75 46.00 6.00 40.50 75.00 46.00 18.00 407.50 1085.50 Percents 9% 8% 26% 11% 1% 10% 18% 11% 4% 100% N/A Average 6.17 5.54 17.63 7.67 1.00 6.75 12.50 7.67 3.00 15.67 180.92Li **Note: Part-Time Hours include Officers, Cadet, Evidence Custodian Prepared by Molly Schwartzkopf 7/28/2011 Pagel Yorkville Police Department Manhour Report This report is based on actual hours per month, not payroll periods. January February March April Through July 16,2011 Regular , OT Regular OT Regular OT Regular . OT Administration_ . -- ----- --- - ------- Chief. 173.33° n/a 173.33; n/a 173.33: n/a 173.33 n/a p ri � � - - --------------- --------------------- De u Chief 2 346.66 n/a 346.66 n/a 346.66 n/a 346.66 n/a ---- - -----._... ..----------__ ---------------- ----- - -- ----------- Lieutenant 173.33' n/a 173.33' n/a 173.33' n/a 173.33 n/a ---.._._. .__ . . Records Staff Executive Assistant n/a n/a n/a; n/a n/a; n/a n/a -- - - -------- --------------------- Records Supervisor 173.33' 0.00 173.33 0.00 173.33' 0.00 173.33 0.00 --------- - ------- ---- -- - - -- _ _._.__. -..._. Records Clerk(1 F 346.66 0.00 346.66 0.00 346.66 0.00 346.66' 0.00 -( -- - ---------- - -------------------__ -------- ------------ ----------------------- Records Clerk 1 P n/a n/a n/a� n/a n/a n/a n/a; n/a --.- .-- ----- -------- ----------- Investigations ...... -- --- ----- ------ -- -- Detectives (1) 346.66 18.00 346.66' 31.00 346.66 10.00 346.66 8.00 Drug Officer (1) 173.33' 18.00 173.33; 6.00 173.33' 28.00 173.33 0.00 Community Policing School Resource (2) 346.66 7.50 346.66 5.00 346.66: 0.00 346.66 0.00 Patrol - -- Sergeants 4 g _ ... _.. O 693.32 0.00 599.99 0.00 519.99 2.00 519.99 0.00 - . --- ------_ _- - --------- ____1 Officers (12) 2253.29 29.75 2253.29 29.58 2253.29 42.00 2253.29! 59.42 Officers (PT - 2) 57.00 n/a 75.00 n/a 63.00 n/a 111.00 n/a Part-Time/Civilian . ............. -- - ----- -- ---------- BFPC Secretary 4.50 n/a 0.00 n/a 1.75; n/a 5.50 n/a - - -- ----------- ----------------------- 11------:---- - -------------- Cadet(1) 53.25 n/a 76.75 n/a 105.25 n/a 96.00: n/a Crossing Guards 3 59.50 n/a 20.50 n/a 53.50� n/a 57.00 n/a - .. - ------ --- -------------- --------- ---------- Evidence Custodian 68.50 n/a 58.50 n/a 89.50 n/a 53.00 n/a Total Hours 5269.32 73.25 5163.99 71.5815166.24' 82.00 5-175.74 67.42 **This column is the current month's manpower;it does not reflect prior month's manpower shifts. Yorkville Police Department Manhour Report This report is based on actual hours per month, not payroll periods. July Through July 16, 2011 May - June - -- - --- -August- Regular . OT Regular , OT Regular OT Regular OT Administration Chief 173.33 n/a 173.33; n/a 173.33. n/a Deputy Chief(2) 346.66 n/a 173.33; n/a 173.33. n/a Lieutenant 173.33 n/a 173.33: n/a 173.33 n/a Records Staff Executive Assistant 40.00 n/a 173.33 n/a 173.33 n/a Records Supervisor 173.33' 0.00 24.00 2.25 n/a n/a Records Clerk(1 F1 306.66. 0.00 173.33:' 0.00 173.33: 0.00 Records Clerk (1 PI n/a n/a 56.75 n/a 40.00 n/a Investigations Detectives (1) 346.66 6.00 173.33' 12.25 173.33 0.00 Drug Officer(1) 173.33 35.00 173.33' 0.00 173.33: 19.50 Community Policing School Resource (2) 346.66 46.00 346.66 27.75 346.66 0.00 Patrol Sergeants (4) 519.99 0.00 519.99' 693.32' 0.00 Officers (12) 2253.29 112.08 2253.29 108.50 2079.96: 169.75 Officers (PT - 2) 188.50 n/a 152.75; 8.00 122.00 n/a Part-Time/Civilian BFPC Secretary n/a 4.25 n/a 8.50 n/a Cadet (1) 129.25: n/a 152.75 n/a 81.50 3.50 Crossing Guards (3) 63.00 13.50 n/a 0.00 n/a Evidence Custodian 51.00 n/a 62.00 n/a 29.50 n/a Total Hours 5296.74 199.08 4799.25 160.-751'461'4'.75 192.75 "This column is the current month's manpower;it does not reflect prior month's manpower shifts. Y 0 R K Y f L L E YORKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT Richard T. Hart, Chief of Police MONTHLY MILEAGE REPORT FOR MAY 2011 Milea a Data e. Total :,,,. Prior ;• Current Maint.Costs # Vehicle Description VIN Vehicle Use �' Monthly. P yonth � Month Miles to late M-1 2006 Dodge Charger 1142 Patrol/Backup 109,519 111,541 2,022 $5,341.03 M-2 12006 Chevrolet Impala 0558 Chief 66,785 67,544 759 $3,634.25 M-3 2007 Chevrolet Impala 8282 Patrol 77,342 79,437 2,095 $3,542.80 M-5 2007 Chevrolet Impala 7933 Patrol 69,953 71,535 1,582 $3,782.50 M-6 2003 Chevrolet Impala 9327 YMS SRO 86,558 87,250 692 $3,105.06 M-7 2011 Ford Crown Victoria 2003 Patrol 8,690 9,700 1,010 $113.91 M-8 2011 Ford Crown Victoria 2002 Patrol 15,608 18,400 2,792 $335.03 M-9 2003 Chevrolet Impala 4284 Deputy Chief 28,678 29,339 661 $1,888.49 M-10 2006 Chevrolet Impala 6611 Patrol 99,763 100,950 1,187 $8,702.95 1999 Ford Ekpeadion 0930 t'endinq disposal - - - nia M-13 2009 Ford Crown Victoria 5720 Patrol 32,352 34,523 2,171 $2,409.47 M-14 2003 Ford Crown Victoria 9357 Cadet 128,184 129,464 1,280 $14,883.62 M-16 2004 Ford Expedition 7301 Deputy Chief 106,090 106,845 755 $13,369.47 M-17 2004 Chevrolet Impala 6120 Detective 48,132 48,364 232 $2,308.07 M-18 2008 Ford Crown Victoria 2870 Patrol 74,110 75,650 1,540 $3;462.43 M-19 2009 Chevrolet Impala 2152 Patrol 40,562 43,151 2,589 $1,713.54 M-20 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe 3189 Patrol Sergeant 68,690 70,244 1,554 $7,629.76 M-22,2007 Ford Crown Victoria 2141 Patrol 113,747 115,100 1,353 $7,804.37 M-23 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 2142 YHS SRO 116,029 116,157 128 $6,858.33 M-24 2008 Ford Explorer 7066 Patrol Sergeant 77,012 79,182 2,170 $5,834.34 M-25 2003 Chevrolet Impala 6632 Administrative 75,075 76,485 1,410 $1,493.81 M-26,2000 Chevrolet Pickup 2387 Support Services 131,143 131,643 500 $2,708.58 M-27 2001 Ford Focus 3709 Administrative 132,356 132,532 176 $926.46 M-28 1997 Cadillac Deville 8741 Unassigned 89,206 89,509 303 $57.93 M-29 Harley-Davidson 6030 Motorcycle - - - n/a M-30 Harley-Davidson 6733 [Motorcycle - - - n/a Total Miles for Fleet 28,961 x 0 R K v# L L E YORKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT Richard T. Hart, Chief of Police MONTHLY MILEAGE REPORT FOR JUNE 2011 Milea a Data .. . Total Prior Current Maint.Costs # Vehicle Description VIN Vehicle Use Monthly Month to Date Month .: . Miles M-1 2006 Dodge Charger 1142 Patrol/Backup 111,541 113,562 2,021 $5,341.03 M-2 2006 Chevrolet Impala 0558 Chief 67,544 68,304 760 $3,634.25 M-3 12007 Chevrolet Impala 8282 Patrol 79,437 81,532 2,095 $3,542.80 M-5 2007 Chevrolet Impala 7933 Patrol 71,535 73,118 1,583 $3,782.50 M-6 2003 Chevrolet Impala 9327 YMS SRO 87,250 87,942 692 $3,105.06 M-7 2011 Ford Crown Victoria 2003 Patrol 9,700 10,710 1,010 $113.91 M-8 2011 Ford Crown Victoria 2002 Patrol 18,400 21,193 2,793 $335.03 M-9 2003 Chevrolet Impala 4284 Deputy Chief 29,339 30,000 661 $1,888.49 M-10 2006 Chevrolet Impala 6611 Patrol 100,950 102,137 1,187 $8,702.95 1999 Expeoitton 0930 Pandirq Disposal - - - n/a M-13 2009 Ford Crown Victoria 5720 Patrol 34,523 36,695 2,172 $2,409.47 M-1412003 Ford Crown Victoria 9357 Cadet 129,464 130,744 1,280 $14,883.62 M-16 2004 Ford Expedition 7301 Deputy Chief 106,845 107,600 755 $13,369.47 M-17 2004 Chevrolet Impala 6120 Detective 48,364 48,596 232 $2,308.07 M-18 2008 Ford Crown Victoria 2870 Patrol 75,650 77,190 1,540 $3,462.43 M.-19.2009 Chevrolet Impala 2152 Patrol 43,151 45,741 2,590 $1,713.54 M-20 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe 3189 Patrol Sergeant 70,244 71,799 1,555 $7,629.76 M-22 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 2141 Patrol 115,100 116,453 1,353 $7,804.37 M-23 2007 Ford Crown Victoria 2142 YHS SRO 116,157 116,285 128 $6,858.33 M-24 2008 Ford Explorer 7066 Patrol Sergeant 79,182 81,353 2,171 $5,834.34 M-25 2003 Chevrolet Impala 6632 Administrative 76,485 77,895 1,410 $1,493.81 M-26 2000 Chevrolet Pickup 2387 Support Services 131,643 132,143 500 $2,708.58 M-27 2001 Ford Focus 3709 Administrative 132,532 132,709 177 $926.46 M-28 1997 Cadillac Deville 8741 Unassigned 89,509 89,813 304 $57.93 M-29 Harle -Davidson 6030 Motorcycle - 250 250 n/a M-30 I Harley-Davidson 16733 Motorcycle - 250 250 n/a Total Miles for Fleet 29,469 St. ratrick Parish 406 Walnut Street Yorkville,Illinois 60560 630.553.6671 Fax:630.553.2695 www.StPatrickYorkville.org June 28,2011 Mr. Larry Hilt Deputy Chief 804 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Il. 60560 Dear Chief Hilt, On behalf of the parishioners of St. Patrick Parish and myself, I want to extend my heartfelt thanks to you for sending us the police escort to help make our Eucharistic Procession such a success. May the good Lord bless you and all policemen of Yorkville abundantly for your generosity. In Jesus and Mary, Fr. Matthew Lamoureux, MIC Pastor I 4V f s.n:..`x ��y :FN=:•:fib `�} I , f I.:.•�_,�:s:�.�:.�::._�.+sxa...r..v:..3s5�fL`.sEnawSS�e»a:��.naa�,.��:....�,_,.._.s.:.:e��sw�.,_-.�sue,' 7, L a,s as e . I I i I ( i� { F - r r �� .'c 3 -A, i I Waubonsee Community College Rt.47 at Waubonsee Drive Sugar Grove, IL 60554 July 21,2011 Chief Richard T.Hart Yorkville Police Department 804 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Dear Chief Hart: My name is Tyler Ronchetto and I am currently a student at Waubonsee Community College in Sugar Grove, Illinois as well as Northern Illinois University in Dekalbe, Illinois. I am majoring in Business but more specifically finance. On July 2&, I participated in a ride-along with Patrol Officer Timothy Kolowski as a part of my introduction to criminal justice class. During our patrol,we made a couple of traffic stops as well as went out on a couple of calls which Officer Kolowski was dispatched to. It was a very interesting and rewarding experience getting to ride along with Officer Tim Kolowski. I learned a lot about a day in the life of a police officer along with a lot of interesting information on many of the tools that each officer is responsible for using. Thank you for allowing me to ride along with Patrol Officer Timothy Kolowski,and please pass on my appreciation to Officer Kolowski as well.This was a informative experience that I will remember for a long time. Sincerely, Tyler Ronchetto cc: Mr. Joe Heinrich C/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0-0 Legal ❑ CA#4 Finance ❑ EST. , �'� 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Chief of Police ■ K PS 2011-22 El LE Kendall ..y Cnty 2 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Ordinance Amending City Code regarding BASSET Training Meeting and Date: City Council—08/09/11 Synopsis: Ordinance to amend liquor code regarding BASSET training requirements. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PS 8/4/11 Action Taken: Consensus to move forward to CC consent agenda for approval. Item Number: PS 2011-22 Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Chief Richard Hart Police Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Attached is an amendment to the liquor code regarding BASSET training. This amendment requires the general manager of each business with a liquor license to be BASSET trained. For temporary or special event liquor licenses,it requires one person to be at the special event at all times who is BASSET trained. 3-3-19: TRAINING REQUIRED: A. All holders of any class of liquor license within the city shall require the general manager of the business to successfully complete a beverage alcohol servers and sellers education training (BASSET) certified training class. A copy of the completed BASSET training certificate shall be filed with the City Clerk's office. > 2009, BASSET eeftifieates for eaek employee named on the list. Additionally, the heefisee will maintain copies of all BASSET eertificates on the lieensed premises for- inspeetion by the eity. B.E All new general managers empleyees shall be allowed two (2) months from their first date of commencement of work performed to complete their required BASSET training. an extension to eemplete BASSET eei4ified tr-aining for-all employees who sepve, s C.&Anyone who is issued a class T temporary license or class SE special event license shall have at least one person who is BASSET trained and certified who shall be at the location where alcoholic liquor is being served at all times during the event. Such person shall have supervisorX authority over and be responsible for the actions of all employees or volunteers not having the required training_ 1. That the applieant has not been found in violation of any of the tinited eit-f of Yofkville's 1;,,uar or-ditiatices within the past three (3) 2. That at least one per-son is BASSET trained and eei4i-fied and shall be at the loeatieft where aleoholie liquor is being serwed at all tifnes during the event. Stich pef!son shall have atithor-ity ever-and be r-esponsible for-the aetions of all employees or-volunteef s not having the 3. That the Yorkville poliee depaftment will pfovide a one hour instr-ttetion on BASSET tr-aining (Ord. 2009 35, 7 14 2009) D. Failure to comply with the provisions of this section may subject the licensee to the penalties for violation of this chapter, up to and including revocation of the license. (Ord. 2008-123, 12- 22-2008) 3-3-19: TRAINING REQUIRED: A. All holders of any class of liquor license within the city shall require the general manager of the business to successfully complete a beverage alcohol servers and sellers education training (BASSET) certified training class. A copy of the completed BASSET training certificate shall be filed with the City Clerk's office. B. All new general managers shall be allowed two (2) months from their first date of commencement of work performed to complete their required BASSET training. C. Anyone who is issued a class T temporary license or class SE special event license shall have at least one person who is BASSET trained and certified who shall be at the location where alcoholic liquor is being served at all times during the event. Such person shall have supervisory authority over and be responsible for the actions of all employees or volunteers not having the required training. D. Failure to comply with the provisions of this section may subject the licensee to the penalties for violation of this chapter, up to and including revocation of the license. (Ord. 2008-123, 12- 22-2008) Ordinance No. 2011- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, PROVIDING FOR LIQUOR CONTROL REGARDING BASSET TRAINING WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a non home-rule municipality in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and has the powers granted to it by law; WHEREAS, the Liquor Control Act of 1934, 235 ILCS 511-1, et seq., (the "Liquor Control Act") sets forth a comprehensive system for the regulation of liquor control within the state of Illinois, and authorizes broad powers to municipalities with regard to local retail licenses; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to amend the regulations pertaining to the sale of liquor as set forth in the City Code of the United City of Yorkville as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Section 3-3-19 of the City Code is hereby amended by deleting Section 3-3-19 in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 3-3-19: TRAINING REQUIRED: A. All holders of any class of liquor license within the city shall require the general manager of the business to successfully complete a beverage alcohol servers and sellers education training (BASSET) certified training class. A copy of the completed BASSET training certificate shall be filed with the City Clerk's office. B. All new general managers shall be allowed two (2) months from their first date of commencement of work performed to complete their required BASSET training. C. Anyone who is issued a class T temporary license or class SE special event license shall have at least one person who is BASSET trained and certified who shall be at the location where alcoholic liquor is being served at all times during the event. Such person shall have supervisory authority over and be responsible for the actions of all employees or volunteers not having the required training. D. Failure to comply with the provisions of this section may subject the licensee to the penalties for violation of this chapter,up to and including revocation of the license. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this Day of , A.D. 2011. CITY CLERK CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this Day of , A.D. 2011. MAYOR 2 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0-0 Legal ❑ CA#5 Finance ❑ EST. , �'� 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ■ Chief of Police ■ K PS 2011-23 LEKendall ..y Cnty 2 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Request to Amend Liquor Code regarding the Term of License for Beer Garden/Patio Licenses Meeting and Date: City Council—08/09/11 Synopsis: Request to amend city liquor code to remove the section of city code which prohibits outdoor liquor licenses between November 1 and April 30. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PS 8/4/11 Action Taken: Consensus to move forward to CC consent agenda for approval. Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Lisa Pickering Clerk's Office Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Please see attached information. D Cll o Memorandum s EST. - leas To: Public Safety Committee =�- From: Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk 0 00 CC: Mayor Gary J. Golinski ' dAC-°Ty �? Rich Hart, Chief of Police <tE '��'� Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: July 29, 2011 Subject: Request for Liquor Code Amendment– Beer Garden/Patio Licenses We have received a request from a current liquor license holder regarding beer garden/patio licenses. Under the current liquor code, the code only allows for these licenses to be issued from May 1 through October 31. Section 3-3-4-5,paragraph D states that"it shall be unlawful for any outdoor liquor license holder to sell or offer for sale any alcoholic liquor, including beer or wine between November 1 and April 30 of any year". The liquor license holder asked if the code could be amended to allow outdoor liquor sales at other times during the year. The license holder said that they had patrons who had left their business during the month of April when the weather was nice, because they preferred to eat outdoors. Staff recommendation is to remove paragraph D from the liquor code, so that there is not a prohibition on outdoor liquor sales between November 1 and April 30. This would allow the Class G licenses to be issued for the same license term as the license holders' primary liquor license. Per section 3-3-5 paragraph A, outdoor licenses would then be issued for a license term of May 1 through April 30. 3-3-4-5: OUTDOOR LIQUOR LICENSE: D. Menths in Whieh Oper-ation is Prohibited: it shall be unlawful for any outdoor-liquer-lieense holder-to sell or- off-er-for- sale any aleaholie liquor-, ineluding beer-or—wifie between November- 1 and April 30 of any yeai7 Ordinance No. 2011- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, PROVIDING FOR LIQUOR CONTROL REGARDING BEER GARDEN/PATIO LICENSES WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a non home-rule municipality in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and has the powers granted to it by law; WHEREAS, the Liquor Control Act of 1934, 235 ILCS 511-1, et seq., (the "Liquor Control Act") sets forth a comprehensive system for the regulation of liquor control within the state of Illinois, and authorizes broad powers to municipalities with regard to local retail licenses; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to amend the regulations pertaining to the sale of liquor as set forth in the City Code of the United City of Yorkville as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Section 3-3-4-5 of the City Code is hereby amended by deleting paragraph D "Months in Which Operation is Prohibited" in its entirety. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this Day of , A.D. 2011. CITY CLERK CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this Day of , A.D. 2011. MAYOR C/Ty Reviewed By: J� A 0 Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number Q I III Fi ❑wit nance CA#6 EST. , 1836 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 4 y Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number OiA county seal ment<Kea�11 .`��0 CommunityDeveloPolice ❑ PS 2011-18 LE Public Works Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Riemenschneider Park parking restrictions Meeting and Date: City Council—August 4, 2011 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PS 8/4/11 Action Taken: Consensus to move forward to CC consent agenda for approval. Item Number: PS 2011-18 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Ordinance No. 2011- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS REGULATING ON-STREET PARKING NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Title 6, Chapter 2, Section 2, of the United City of Yorkville Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by adding the following: 6-2-2: PARKING PROHIBITED ON DESIGNATED STREETS: McHUGH ROAD A "no parking" zone shall be created on the west side of McHugh Road between Hayden Drive and Prairie Pointe Drive. Section 2. If any Section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Chapter is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2011. CITY CLERK CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING LARRY KOT JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2011. MAYOR Co.y o Memorandum '"' To: City Council EST. �Z 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator .4 _�` CC: 0 �� o,gaa, �p Date: July 29, 2011 Ke tld"u" Subject: Parkin near Riemenschneider Park J g This item was last discussed at the July Public Safety Committee meeting. At that meeting, the committee discussed parking restrictions around the park and the cost of restriping McHugh Road to include parking adjacent to the park. The specific proposal would involve restricting parking on the west side of McHugh Road between Hayden Drive and Prairie Pointe Drive (map attached). In order to safely allow parking on the east side of McHugh Road along that same stretch, the road will have to be restriped for on-road parking stalls. Public Works Director Dhuse has included an estimate of the restriping, which is minimal. Staff recommends approval of an ordinance that will restrict parking on the west side of McHugh Road between Hayden Drive and Prairie Pointe Drive. j/8 s �'e 1� �l S'O'S 6:p Q 1 21 Ad'~'P0%0 P^°rte a ,C Hayden-'Or e� a 2 u � �^ Prairie-Pointe-Dr �O X27 Gt`�5 0 cc United City of Yorkville GIS The Data is provided without warranty or any representation of np y accuracy,timeliness,or completeness.It is the responsibility of the �1?i Parcel Data and Aerial Photography "Requester"to determine accuracy,timeliness,completeness,and w-��e Provided By Kendall County GIS appropriateness of its use. The United City of Yorkville makes no warranties,expressed or implied,to the use of the Data. s cip Memorandum EST. ! 1es6 To: Public Safety Committee 1 From: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works CC: ® Date: July 29, 2011 Subject: McHugh Rd. Striping <LE Please find below a cost estimate for re-striping a portion of McHugh Rd. between Prairie Pointe Dr. and Hayden Dr. to allow for parking on the east side of McHugh. Grinder rental to remove existing striping 2 days @ $135/day $270.00 Yellow pavement marking paint, 5 gallons $100.00 White pavement marking paint, 5 gallons $100.00 Glass bead for reflectivity $100.00 All removal and replacement of striping will be performed by public works and parks employees. c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 i o J a s Legal ❑ Minutes #1 Finance ❑ EST. 1 � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑ K d11 ty CC 2011—VQ 9 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the City Council—July 12, 2011 Meeting and Date: City Council 08/09/11 Synopsis: Approval of minutes. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: City Clerk Warren Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY,July 12, 2011 Mayor Golinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Warren called the roll. Ward I Gilson Present Colosimo Present Ward I I Milschewski Present Kot Present Ward III Munns Present(arrived at 7:48) Funkhouser Present Ward IV Spears Present Teeling Present(left at 9:42) Also present: City Clerk Warren, City Treasurer Powell, City Attorney Orr, City Administrator Olson, Police Chief Hart, Deputy Chiefs of Police Hilt, Public Works Director Dhuse, Finance Director Fredrickson, EEI Engineer Sanderson, and Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble QUORUM A quorum was established. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to revise the dollar amount of Consent Agenda item 1 CC 2011 —76 bills for payment for the amount of$544,298.47 to $420,671.47. So moved Alderman Colosimo; seconded Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Spears-aye, Milschewski-aye, Colosimo-aye, Kot-aye PRESENTATIONS None. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Building Code Update Please, see attached report of proceedings by Christine Vitosh C.S.R.from Depo Court Reporting Service for the transcription of this portion of the meeting. CITIZEN COMMENTS Mike Skinner, a citizen, strongly requests that the City Council does not appoint Arthur Prochaska to the Plan Commission. Prochaska's administration is the major cause of our economic situation in the City of Yorkville, and now the city is feeling the effects of that administration. Arthur Prochaska's questionable annexation agreements that resulted in lawsuits that the city is still paying the legal bills, the mass annexation of subdivisions that have dragged this City down financially with water and sewer extensions. He is not saying that Arthur Prochaska is personally responsible, but his administration is. It is a slap in the face to all the citizens that are trying to put this town back on track. Todd Milliron, 61 Cotswold Drive, thanked the committee for the work on the fire sprinklers and building codes. He stated Alderman Spears said a value cannot be put on a person's life, and the additional cost of fire sprinkler was well worth it. If she can make that argument, then he doesn't understand her opposition to the minimal cost of the bike trails. It's interesting that Mayor Golinski is appointing former Mayor Arthur Prochaska to the Planning Commission. Anne Lucietto,who is the current chairman, has served on the Planning Commission since 1990. She is an experienced mechanical engineer. She has worked for Com Ed, Fermi Lab and Caterpillar. Anne Lucietto has given 23 years of public service to the city of Yorkville and has served the city with distinction. Our current mayor has not even lived in the City of Yorkville for 10 years. This appointment is not based on expertise but on politics. The reason that Anne Lucietto is being discarded was that she did not live within the city limits. According to state statute that is not a disqualifying factor. As long as she has lived within one and a half miles of the city limits she is eligible to serve on the plan commission. That is a state statute. Mayor Golinski is recommending for appointment a former Mayor whose leadership resulted in multiple lawsuits being filed against the city and resulting in a loss of hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars. Back in 2007 when Mayor Burd appointed Jeff Baker and the City Council appointed Anne Lucietto to the Plan Commission Alderman The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—July 12, 2011—Page 2 of 9 Golinski attacked her for appointing what he called her political cronies. He had no proof of any cronyism,but that didn't stop him. Mr. Baker lived a few blocks away from Mayor Burd, and that was his damning evidence. Mayor Golinski didn't realize that Ann Lucietto, at that time,had served on the plan commission for 17 years. If those appointments were cronyism, then what is this?Mr. Prochaska appointed Mr. Golinski to the City Council in 2007, and can be given credit for starting Mr. Golinski's political career. If the City Council votes in favor of this appointment tonight then they will be sending Yorkville a clear message about their integrity and what the City Council really stand for. Mayor Golinski asked Mayor Burd, "How can you sleep at night when you did not reappoint a long serving member of the Library Board"?Maybe Mayor Golinski would like to answer his own question in regards to this Plan Commission appointment. Jesus Alaniz, Colonial Parkway, stated there are things that just don't make sense with the State of Illinois and he doesn't trust the state government. He discussed the Route 47 Project changes to the drawings. To make changes does take work but not thousands of dollars. There is no statute that can justify why it costs thousands of dollars to make those changes. He stated the City Council is in its infancy and must be careful not to cave on issues. He has an issue with the usage tax the Governor passed this year. The Constitution states that a person cannot pass a law and make it retroactive and then charge someone with a crime. Yet, that is what the Governor did. He takes the usage tax law and goes back to July of 2004 and states that everyone is now responsible. Citizens have until October of this year to pay any usage tax going back to 2004. He granted this under the status of amnesty. People are telling him to pay the tax for it is only three dollars,yet, he brings up the scenario of the penny tax. He brought up the issue of City Council members receiving health insurance benefits. He believes that it is no crime to take a benefit if it is being offered. This information has been released through the Freedom of Information Act. The Governor assigned one person to handle the Freedom of Information Act requests. The City must assign a person to handle this or be charged a fine between$2,000 and$5,000 dollars. The Governor holds the city to one standard while he has another standard for himself. Lisa Madigan used the Freedom of Information Act to try to make public the names of everyone who owned firearms. He still feels that the bike trails are an unnecessary expense,but would like to know the cost of the overall project. He wants to know who is going to do the work. Will the Illinois Department of Transportation or the State be utilizing independent contractors?If so, who will assume the liability risks and costs?If the city proceeds with the trails utilizing independent contractors,he believes the contractor should be bonded. He understands this has been a big burden put on the Mayor and City. If nothing else, our citizens deserve to have confidence in our government, especially during these tough times. Tom Gilmour, a citizen, regrets having to make this statement,but he wanted to comment on Mayor Golinski's appointment of the former Mayor Arthur Prochaska for the Plan Commission. He is disappointed in the Mayor's choice of this appointment due to the former mayor's involvement in the landfill development. He believes Arthur Prochaska acted as a conduit for the Fox Moraine landfill. He believes this is reason enough to deny the former mayor's appointment to the Plan Commission. Mr. Prochaska concealed the fact of the landfill from the developers along the Fox Road corridor knowing that the annexation of these properties was necessary to annex the property on which the landfill would occupy as shown in the confidential memos Mr. Prochaska had sent. The memo also stated the need to keep this information from developers. Risky ways to pay for utilities were also suggested to expedite the annexation. Secondly, the Mayor also tried to deceive the public by saying the annexation was not about the landfill, although the proposed landfill was discussed throughout the memo. The memos stated that Yorkville will be impacted in excess by the proposed landfill, not just environmental but in terms of excess traffic and smell. Mr. Gilmour stated it shows a complete disregard for health, safety, and quality of life for both the city and surrounding area. In summary someone with this track record should not be put in the position of planning and development in Yorkville. This city's involvement with the proposed landfill has cost Yorkville hundreds of thousands of dollars over the past five years, including legal fees stemming from this lawsuit. He urges the City Council not to make this appointment tonight, but rather continue to look for qualified candidates. Glen Poole, a citizen,has lived in Yorkville for eight years. He came to Yorkville because of its small- town charm, and he wanted this to be his retirement community. Mr. Poole wants to speak tonight about Arthur Prochaska. Mr. Prochaska was a good mayor, and he did good things for Yorkville. However, due to what occurred during Mr. Prochaska's administration, which impacted the community; Mr.Poole does not want Mr. Prochaska to be appointed to the Plan Commission. Mr. Poole asked that the Mayor and City Council consider his position. He would recommend finding more candidates for the Plan Commission. Fred DuSell, a citizen, has lived in Yorkville since 2003. He went through the process with the landfill situation. Mr. DuSell is tired of paying for legal expenses of elected officials that were neglectful of their duty to the taxpayers of Yorkville. Mr. DuSell is very upset about that. He believes Mr. Prochaska has demonstrated a lack of fiduciary responsibility to the taxpayers of Yorkville, and Mr. DuSell doesn't believe Mr. Prochaska deserves this appointment. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—July 12, 2011 —Page 3 of 9 CONSENT AGENDA 1. CC 2011-76 Bills for Payment- $420,671.47 2. PW 2011-41 100 Bridge Street Plaza—Permanent Fire Hydrant Easement—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 3. PS 2011-17 Police Reports for May 2011 4. Ordinance 2011-28 Authorizing the Collection of an Application Fee from Applicants to the Police and Fire Departments—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute(PS 2011-19) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. Alderman Colosimo stated two line items need to be amended by motion on the bill list itself before the City Council votes on the Consent Agenda. He stated that on the bill list, the two payments that were erroneous were never officially removed to amend those two line items. He wants to amend those two line items. The only amendment that was mentioned was the new total but never specifically the two line items. For prosperity and for the record, he believes the City Council should amend the two line items. City Attorney Orr asked if the City Council, for the record, assumed that the change in the total reflects a change on page 1 of the bill list of the WMSY property changed from$130,000 to $6400 and at the revised sum also reflects for the record page 17 of the bill list Big Ben Builders check amount been changed from$596.70 to $569.70. Thank you. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye, Milschewski-aye, Spears-aye, Munns-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Gilson-aye, Teeling-aye, Kot-aye Minutes for Approval: 1. CC 2011-64 Minutes of City Council—May 24, 2011 2. CC 2011-77 Minutes of City Council—June 14, 2011 Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the minutes of the City Council from May 24, 2011 and June 14, 2011 as presented. So moved Alderman Spears; seconded Alderman Munns. Alderman Milschewski had more changes to the May 24, 2011,minutes which had been tabled. On page 15 of 15 under the Executive Session is still out of order with the Mayor entertaining a motion, and it was not reflected who was seconded until after the roll call. There should be a vote after the so moved and seconded. These changes will be reflected in the future minutes. Alderman Colosimo stated that on the May 24,2011, meeting the first citizen to speak had an incorrect last name. His last name was Stagner. Alderman Spears stated on page 3, second paragraph, needs to be changed from state to stake holder meeting. Also on page 5 under Public Works Committee report the second sentence all that needs to be done is to take the period out. Also, on page 9 the 11th sentence up, it states Alderman Spears asks City Administrator Olson to answer his question. Alderman Spears stated Alderman Gilson said the last contractor hasn't been paid instead of hasn't paid. On page 14 under the Community Liaison report Alderman Spears attended the NEIL board meeting instead of the Illinois board meeting. Also, where it says Alderman Spears asked citizens to contact their senators for disapproval of the budget. All of these corrections must be shown on the July 12, 2011,minutes as well as well as on the actual May 24, 2011, City Council meeting minutes. Mayor Golinski stated that the City Council can approve the minutes as amended. The amended minutes were unanimously approved by a viva voce vote. City Attorney Orr stated that the vote was for both sets of minutes. REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT Appointment to Plan Commission—Arthur Prochaska (CC 2011-78) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the Mayor's Appointment of Arthur Prochaska Jr. to the Plan Commission. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. Alderman Gilson does not believe Arthur Prochaska should be appointed to the Plan Commission Committee. Due to Mr. Prochaska's involvement with the past administration, for it was detrimental to the city. Mr.Prochaska left the city holding the bag, costing the residents and the taxpayers. It is a bad idea to put Mr. Prochaska back in an advisory position. Based on what Alderman Gilson stated and what the citizens stated, Alderman Teeling cannot approve this appointment. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—July 12, 2011—Page 4 of 9 Alderman Colosimo has known Mr. Prochaska for several years and thinks he is a good man. He has made mistakes in the past, and no administration is perfect. He believes this is a good thing for Yorkville. He must go with his gut and approve the appointment of Mr. Prochaska to the Plan Commission simply for the fact that he respects our current Mayor. This is an advisory position and ultimately the decisions that the Plan Commission Committee make have to be approved by the City Council. Alderman Colosimo feels there are enough safeguards so if the City Council doesn't like what is happening then ultimately it is the City Council's decision. Mr. Prochaska is willing to step up for no pay and a lot of work with very little acknowledgment from the residents. He will vote to appoint Arthur Prochaska and if he is appointed, wishes him well. Alderman Funkhouser was surprised to see the recommendation for the appointment of Arthur Prochaska after everything that has transpired over the years. Mr.Prochaska is willing to step up and the city does have safeguards. This is an advisory committee, so if somebody is not working for the best interest of the city, then it is the City Council's responsibility to oversee that. If Mr. Prochaska were to be appointed, the City Council is taking that responsibility. He has given this much thought and has decided to vote yes to the appointment of Arthur Prochaska. Alderman Teeling wanted the City Council to know that the city had another applicant and that applicant was qualified. Alderman Gilson said the city did have another applicant which he thought would do a nice job. The City Council should wait and to see if there are other applicants. Alderman Munns stated for the record, that in the past when the landfill issues started, he voted against the landfill. Arthur Prochaska has done good things for the city,but obviously, the landfill issue goes on the other side. He has agreed and disagreed with Mr. Prochaska when he was Mayor and on the City Council. This is an advisory board and the board cannot do anything without the consent of the City Council. It will be a tough call either way. He asked Mayor Golinski if the City Council has always voted on appointments or does the Mayor just appoint these positions himself. Alderman Munns doesn't remember voting on these appointments. Mayor Golinski stated he needs consent of the City Council. Mayor Golinski feels that Arthur Prochaska was perfect for the Plan Commission with his knowledge, experience, and history with the City. Mr. Prochaska has done a lot for the City of Yorkville over the years. Mayor Golinski has talked to Mr. Prochaska on many issues, and whether he agrees with him or not, has always valued his opinion. Mayor Golinski stated that is what he looks for in an advisory board member. He doesn't understand the controversy, and feels Mr. Prochaska has done more for the city than many people in this room. He believes the development during Mr. Prochaska's administration has been phenomenal. Alderman Gilson asked Mayor Golinski to remember the issues do not stop with the landfill. That was one major part of a bigger picture. Some issues the City Council cannot speak about, and some issues the citizens are well aware. When a person makes a mistake they should own up to it. When a person doesn't collect debt from developers, it cost the city millions of dollars,which is what happened. To this day that mistake has not been owned up to. The City Council has stated the city has safeguards in place. The only safeguard the city has in place was raising the taxes and taking the money back out of the resident's pockets, which is not a safeguard. He asked the City Council to please take a step back, look at everything that has transpired, and once again requests that the City Council wait on this issue. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-2 Munns-aye, Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-nay, Gilson-nay, Kot-aye Appointment of Deputy Clerk (CC 2011-79) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the appointment of Lisa Pickering as Deputy Clerk. So moved by Alderman Munns; second and by Alderman Colosimo. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye, Kot-aye, Munns-aye IDOT Agreement for Reconstruction of Route 47 (CC 2011-80) Mayor Golinski said the City received new estimates from IDOT regarding Yorkville's share of the Route 47 Project. It went down about $900,000 dollars. The original estimate was 3.58 million the new estimate is 2.625 million. That is a difference of about $900,000 dollars. The staff is asking for direction due to this new cost savings. Is the city proceeding with taking out all amenities?Mayor Golinski received phone calls from downtown businesses asking the city not to remove these items from the downtown The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—July 12, 2011—Page 5 of 9 aesthetics. There are developers looking to invest a lot of money in our downtown, and the developers also asked the city not to remove the aesthetics. Alderman Munns asked if it is really going to stop developers from developing, if the amenities are not included in the Route 47 Project. If the city can save money by leaving out the aesthetics, then the money can be used for many other items. Alderman Munns doesn't believe leaving out amenities is going to make that big of a difference. Alderman Colosimo agreed with Alderman Munns. The City Council has one chance to make a decision, and the residents were told that the City Council would try to trim the cost. Alderman Gilson also agrees with Alderman Munns and Alderman Colosimo. Alderman Gilson had questions on some of these items and began asking several questions to City Administrator Olson in regards to IDOT's road construction maintenance, safety accommodations, crosswalks, and costs of time delay for removing items. City Administrator Olson answered these questions by stating the questions might be easier answered by forwarding the e-mail from IDOT for they did address each item individually. They are not asking for comments on every other section in the agreement tonight. They are mainly looking for direction on stamping, coloring, fencing, and trails. Alderman Gilson stated the reason he is asking these questions now is if the City Council is going to vote on these items then the Council should have the whole picture of what the items cost. City Administrator Olson stated from what he gathered from reading the e-mail there was nothing in the city's questions and IDOT's answers that would significantly delay the project or cost additional money. It was merely justification based on those decisions. Alderman Gilson said adding sidewalks is not going to cost additional money. IDOT will throw that in there. Alderman Gilson wonders how this will all work. City Administrator Olson stated that there was an omission on IDOT's part, and they agreed to do it at their cost. Alderman Spears said the City Council is not voting on this tonight. Mayor Golinski wants direction on the optional items that the City Council has talked about removing. Alderman Gilson wanted to know if the City Council would come back to this issue in the future. He has more questions to be asked. City Administrator Olson said he would be happy to put as part of the public record if Alderman Gilson wants to forward his comments over then he can answer them individually in detail,put them in the packet for the next meeting, and then that will give Alderman Gilson the benefit of seeing what IDOT sends to him. Alderman Gilson stated that if the City Council is just voting on removing those items, he believes that should happen. Alderman Funkhouser said as a consideration, the City Council needs to keep the stamped concrete on the crosswalks. He believes this amenity has an actual safety benefit. If the city can manage keeping this in, he feels it is very important. Alderman Milschewski wanted to know the cost to cut these items. City Administrator Olson stated to remove them it would cost nothing. He did confirm that the removal of coloring, stamping, fencing, and handrails could be done with enough staff that there would be no delay to the project, and no cost to the city. Mayor Golinski said there are four items, so he assumes the City Council members are okay with removing the Fox fencing and handrails. Should the City Council go around the room to give a decision on the stamped sidewalk and the coloring, or do the City Council members want to get rid of those amenities, also?Alderman Milschewski asked if the stamped concrete will be hard to maintain. Public Works Director Dhuse stated it is a state road, so it will be maintained. Alderman Milschewski stated the stamped concrete the city is removing is the crosswalk, not the walkway. City Administrator Olson believes there was some stamping on the curb and two feet back from the curb. Public Works Director Dhuse stated there is a ribbon behind the curb. There is stamping and coloring behind the curb, as well. City Administrator Olson stated that this is to differentiate the closest point to the curb. Alderman Milschewski assumed the state is putting some type of design into the stamping. Public Works Director Dhuse stated the city is putting a brick or rock formation in the stamping. Alderman Milschewski asked if that will be hard for staff to maintain. Public Works Director Dhuse stated it would be like maintaining a brick driveway. Alderman Milschewski stated it is something the city could use. Alderman Colosimo asked the cost. Mayor Golinski stated$59,000 for the stamping and$19,000 for the coloring. The City Council had talked about removing the stamping and keeping the coloring, so the crosswalks would be red. Part of this also is the ADA curb ramp. If both the stamping and coloring are removed, the city will not have ADA curb ramps that are colored and textured. The city would still have the ramps. The ramps would be regular concrete. Alderman Funkhouser stated that the ADA curb ramps are a state requirement and cannot be removed. He wanted to clarify from the City Council that the coloring and stamping is explicitly the crosswalks or does that include the curb and the two foot band adjacent to the roadways. City administrator Olson stated the total $19,000 coloring is crosswalks, sidewalks, and curbs. Originally, he thought the$59,000 was the stamping for sidewalks but now he thinks it was for crosswalks as well. He doesn't know what the differentiation is between the two. Alderman Funkhouser votes to leave the color for the crosswalks. Alderman Funkhouser stated that if the coloring would make the sidewalks and crosswalks pop,he believes the coloring is ok. However,he would still prefer the stamping, handrails, and guardrails. Alderman Spears would like to have all amenities out of the city's budget and use the money to provide for a flashing light at pedestrian crossings in the downtown area. There is no money in the city's budget. Alderman Kot stated that he would like to see the colored sidewalks or crosswalks stay in. He believes, for the money, that is a nice asset for the downtown area. Alderman Gilson would like to The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—July 12, 2011 —Page 6 of 9 remove all the amenities. Alderman Teeling would love to see all the amenities stay in,but she realizes that is not an option. She would like at least the coloring to stand as an option. Mayor Golinski asked if it is correct that the city should get rid of everything except for the coloring. Alderman Munns asked how many City Council members wanted coloring. Four answered yes. Alderman Milschewski asked if the city is specifying the coloring just for the crosswalks or all of it. City Attorney Orr stated just for number two, the$19,000 there were four. Mayor Golinski said to keep the coloring for $19,000. He asked City Administrator Olson if he had clear direction, and City Administrator Olson stated fencing out, handrail out, stamping out, and coloring in. He will send in that letter to IDOT tomorrow. Heartland Circle—Rescind Warranty Bond Call (CC 2011-81) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to rescind the previously approved call of a developer's bond B98804-010285. So moved by Alderman Funkhouser; seconded by Alderman Spears. Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble stated the City Council authorized city staff to call a bond from the developer. It was about $4,000 dollars that was an outstanding punch list item from the Heartland Circle Subdivision. At that time there were four trees that had died and needed to be taken away. Since that time the staff has reviewed the punch list and the annexation agreement. There are clauses in the agreement that state it has to respond within 30 calendar days as a request for improvements to be completed and sent into the city. That was not met, so she is asking approval from the City Council to rescind the previously granted warranty bond call for Heartland Circle and authorized the city staff to execute and send the attached letter to the bond issuer. Alderman Gilson wanted to know if Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble had already submitted the letter dated July 13, 2011. Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble had not submitted it. She is showing the letter to the City Council, so they can see the language in the letter. Alderman Gilson stated that on May 6, 2010, there was a letter from the former City Engineer Wywrot in response to the request to the developer. Alderman Gilson wanted to know if there was any response from that letter. Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble stated she was not involved but the developer is here tonight. The developer, Gary Neyer, stated they completed this on May 6`h. Alderman Gilson questioned whether there was a response to the May 6, 2010 letter. Mr. Neyer stated no. Alderman Gilson stated he read a memo about the city's crosswalks, intersections, and replacement of trees. Fourteen trees were listed. The developer, Gary Neyer, stated that is correct. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye, Kot-aye, Munns-aye, Spears-aye PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT Route 71 (Route 47 to Orchard Road)—IDOT Letter of Understanding (PW 2011-40) Alderman Gilson made a motion to approve the letter of understanding between IDOT and the United City of Yorkville regarding the proposed Route 71 Project and authorized the Mayor to execute. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Aldermen Munns. Alderman Gilson asked if the city budget covered sidewalks between Walsh Drive to Walgreens. If so, Alderman Gilson wanted to know when the funding will be available. City Administrator Olson stated the city has not yet budgeted for these. The project should be built within the next 5 to 10 years. The city has not budgeted for phase 2 for engineering or phase 3 which is construction. It is 5 to 10 years out from having to be budgeted. Alderman Gilson asked about the shared use paths and wanted to know if the city has budgeted for these trails. City Administrator Olson stated the same answer that was given for the sidewalks because it is that far off. For now, the city has a three year budget. Alderman Gilson asked if the city had gotten a commitment from the county and other entities regarding their payments for their parts of those sections. City Administrator Olson stated no. He just received their letter of understanding. Alderman Gilson mentioned the lighting and stated he assumes it is all the same cost. The city has a budget that is 5 to 10 years out, and he mentioned it is that way for engineering and all across the board. City Administrator Olson stated that is correct. Alderman Gilson said on page 2 of the memo of the Illinois Department of Transportation it states that if the city should decide in the future to eliminate work listed above, they may be responsible for the actual cost of preliminary engineering. City Administrator Olson stated correct. His understanding was as long as the city removes the trails prior to the beginning of phase 2 design engineering it shouldn't be a problem. He has a verbal commitment from IDOT,but not in writing. Alderman Gilson stated that the Yorkville portion of this project is tentatively scheduled for construction in the fiscal years 2012 to 2017. Is IDOT going to guarantee Yorkville that they are going to have the funding available for this project, and if they don't, can the city charge IDOT back?He doesn't understand why IDOT expects Yorkville to project out to 2017,but if IDOT cannot come up with the funding that is okay. Alderman Spears said that The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—July 12, 2011—Page 7 of 9 on page 2 of IDOT's letter to the city it stated other items such as utility, relocations, and sewer casings would also be 100% of the local agency costs. She has a concern projecting out that far. She believes the city is going to put ourselves in a position it is in with other items right now. There is no way to know what type of economy the city will have in 2017. Alderman Colosimo agrees with Alderman Spears and Alderman Gilson. He can't promise that the city will be able to budget for these items in 2017. The first step would be to look at a bigger budget plan so the city can see what their projections are and where the city can allocate resources in the future. If this is a priority for the City to allocate the resources then send the letter off stating that the City Council agreed to commit these resources in the future. Alderman Gilson stated even if the city projects for these items in 2017 the money may not come in to support the projects based on the City's projection. Alderman Gilson believes the City Council cannot cave in to this item by sending a letter of understanding to IDOT saying the money will be there. Alderman Colosimo stated the widening of a state road is a 5 to 10 year project. A City will always be in the predicament of having to budget 5 to 10 years ahead. If a budget could be worked out, the City Council would still not be 100%sure if the money would be available but would have a better idea. There will always be a little risk to get a project completed that is 5 to 10 years down the road otherwise the roads will never get widened. The City Council must be conservative in approaching the budget. Alderman Funkhouser stated that the widening of Route 47 is worthwhile, however questions whether the city can afford its portion in the future. The removal of the provision that the city is responsible for changes initiated by IDOT would make the project more desirable. Another negative to the project is the cost associated with changes initiated by the city. Motion failed by a roll call vote. Ayes-2 Nays-6 Teeling-aye, Gilson-nay, Kot-aye, Munns-nay, Spears-nay, Colosimo-nay, Funkhouser-nay, Milschewski-nay Progressive Energy Natural Gas Proposal (PW 2011-44) Alderman Gilson made a motion to move gas accounts from Nicor to Santanna for a contract term of 12 months. Seconded by Alderman Colosimo. Alderman Munns confirmed with City Administrator Olson that in a previous discussion he felt that switching to Santanna would not provide substantial savings. Alderman Munns questioned from where Santanna's portion comes. He wants to know who is responsible for the purchase of the gas and who is responsible for the maintenance of the lines. City Administrator Olson stated Santanna is paid a percentage from Nicor and that Nicor would be responsible for maintaining pipelines. Santanna would be responsible only for the production of gas. Alderman Gilson questioned if the removal of the 10 accounts from Nicor would increase the overall cost to the City. City Administrator Olson stated he does not believe the price is volume based but simply a flat rate for the Cash for Terms Program. Alderman Gilson suggests the city verify the cost associated with these changes. Alderman Colosimo questioned whether the rebate associated with gas purchase is based on usage, and if so, how would it affect the city. City Administrator Olson stated that the rebate is based on population, not based on usage. Alderman Colosimo moved to table this issue back to Public Works so the city can get an answer on how it will affect the rate and reduce the consumption. Seconded by Alderman Gilson. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Gilson-aye, Kot-aye, Munns-aye, Spears-aye ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PARK BOARD Raintree Village Park B—Change Order#1 (CC 2011-82) The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—July 12, 2011—Page 8 of 9 Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve a change order for Raintree Village Part B playground, amount not to exceed$740 dollars. So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Gilson-aye, Kot-aye, Munns-aye, Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye PLAN COMMISSION Mayor Golinski stated the Plan Commission meeting is tomorrow. He is appointing Tom Lindblom as the new chairman of the Plan Commission. That is just an informational item. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS No report. CITY COUNCIL REPORT No report. CITY CLERK's REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT City Treasurer Powell stated the city was notified today that Illinois Department of Insurance was going to perform a routine audit on the police pension fund. This is the first audit the city has ever had on this fund. He is looking forward to seeing how the city does. COMMUNITY& LIAISON REPORT The Developer Impact Fees Alderman Colosimo stated the Library Board wants to discuss the ordinance covering the developer impact fees at upcoming Administration Committee Meeting. The Library Board's concern is that the ordinance is too restrictive. City Attorney Orr has drafted a new proposed ordinance and showed it in last night's Library Board meeting. The proposed ordinance would give the Library Board more flexibility for expenditures. YBSD Meeting Alderman Gilson attended the Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District meeting on July 11, 2011. The committee discussed liability insurance and pollution insurance if necessary. The contract,which will be approved August 8, 2011,was reviewed. Penalties and punitive damages were excluded. June and July bills were approved as presented. The Dissolved Oxygen Project has been delayed due to lack of parts. Plant gates are in the process of automating, and the operators for those gates are$5,000 done by remote. They met with Hutchinson Engineering about River Road Bridge construction. A concern is a rise in the elevation of the road and the narrowing of the entrance to the plant and drainage. YBSD are also expressing concern about fast tracking the bridge construction without a report on how they are going to handle the dam. They asked if the bridge construction might be jeopardized depending on the outcome of the dam stabilization or removal. YBSD did a couple student tours this week and met with the city to discuss the ice cream facility for the Whitewater Park and the possibility of a restaurant behind the facility. They have an issue with cutting a deal with a private business in a public place versus cutting a deal with a private business across the street. YBSD has no long-term incentive to cut a deal. YBSD wants more communication between the city and the district. Former City Engineer Joe Wywrot was the point man, and who should the citizens go to now for day-to-day issues. YBSD didn't know about the White Water business before they had plumbing on the floor. A permit is supposed to be obtained first before construction is allowed. There is a lack of communication that would be fixed if businesses follow the proper procedure. YBSD plans on keeping their fees consistent, and they believe their fees are justified. The city is considering sacrificing their exemption status regarding paying the real estate taxes on that facility. If the city wants to rent property, then the City needs to start considering payment of the fees and real estate taxes ahead of time. The YBSD stated there is 50% more water being treated by the YBSD city pumps annually. Grease traps and appliance standards were discussed. There was a report that the budget has been passed, and the report needs to be signed so the YBSD can post the budget. New higher policies were discussed. There will be a meeting with the Fox River study group for the river is very low and they will be discussing that. The flow will be discussed, also. The YBSD also had a discussion on secondary bank selection. Alderman Colosimo pointed out that publication one which was PS 1 Parking Grande Reserve North, was overlooked on the agenda. He would like that to be put on the next City Council meeting. City Administrators Olson stated the reason it was in the packet is that it was on the draft agenda and the city did not send out the notification letters to the residents on time. It was scheduled for the next meeting. The information did not get removed from the packet. Alderman Colosimo asked when a letter is going out. City Administrator Olson stated that it went out July 11, 2011. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—July 12, 2011 —Page 9 of 9 STAFF REPORT No report. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Signage Alderman Munns stated that due to the tree falling down on Cannonball Trail,he wants to have signs put up at the entrance of Route 47. Residents are upset with trucks speeding through their subdivision. Public Works Director Dhuse will get signs up tomorrow. Police Chief Hart stated his department is keeping an extra watch out for semis. Breakdown of housing department costs Alderman Colosimo wanted a breakdown of our departments when a new house is built in Yorkville,with the fee amount,how it gets distributed and if it is possible to get a comparison for municipalities within Kendall County. If the city is encouraging development, he would like to see how competitive the city is. City Administrator Olson stated that it is being done in Economic Development Committee at this time and will be reported back to the City Council. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to go into Executive Session for the purpose of the following three items. 1. For litigation, when an action against, affecting, or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting. 2. The purchase or lease of real property for use of the public body. 3. The setting of a price for sale or lease of property owned by the public body. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Spears-aye, Milschewski-aye, Colosimo-aye, Kot-aye, Gilson-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Munns-aye The City Council entered Executive Session at 10:02 p.m. The City Council returned to regular session at 10:31 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to adjourn the meeting. So moved by Alderman Funkhouser; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. Adjournment of the meeting was unanimously approved by a viva voce vote. Meeting adjourned at10:32 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Beth Warren, City Clerk, City of Yorkville, Illinois UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS CITY COUNCIL MEETING PUBLIC HEARING 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois Tuesday, July 12, 2011 D-943611 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 2 1 PRESENT : 2 Mr . Gary Golinski, Mayor; 3 Mr . George Gilson, Jr . , Alderman; 4 Mr . Carlo Colosimo, Alderman; 5 Ms . Jackie Milschewski, Alderman; 6 Mr . Larry Kot, Alderman; 7 Mr . Marty Munns, Alderman; 8 Mr . Chris Funkhouser, Alderman; 9 Ms . Rose Ann Spears, Alderman; 10 Ms . Diane Teeling, Alderman . 11 12 ALSO PRESENT : 13 Mr . Bart Olson, City Administrator, 14 Mr . William Powell, City Treasurer, 15 Ms . Beth Warren, City Clerk, 16 Ms . Kathleen Field-Orr, City Attorney. 17 - - - 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 3 1 (Pledge of Allegiance . ) 2 MAYOR GOLINSKI : We will go into public 3 hearing for the building code update . 4 MS . NOBLE : Sure . Good evening. This 5 has been a long journey for the Community 6 Development Department as well as the Building 7 Update Committee . 8 They were appointed last year, and 9 beginning July, 2010 we went into the process of a 10 nine-month long endeavor of updating, going 11 through each of the codes, analyzing them, and 12 coming to some recommendations that we ' re going to 13 be giving to you tonight . 14 Currently the City is operating 15 under the 2000 I codes; those are the 2000 16 International codes . They are standard throughout 17 the country. There is a committee that meets 18 yearly, and every three years the cycle of these 19 codes are updated, so the codes have been updated 20 in 2003, 2006 and now 2009, and we are three 21 cycles behind the most recent code updates and we 22 are looking to increase that time frame of us 23 reviewing these codes so that we are constant with 24 what the new building practices and construction DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 4 1 practices and management styles are . 2 So, with that being said, the Staff 3 has put together a very comprehensive memo of all 4 of our discussions and recommendations for the 5 building code update today, and I will point out 6 just a few things . 7 The International Fuel and Gas Code, 8 we ' re looking at the 2009 version, and there is 9 one recommendation that Staff is making that is 10 not in sync with the Building Code Update 11 Committee, just so you know that . 12 The International Plumbing Code, we 13 are looking at adopting the 2009 as well as the 14 most current version of the state plumbing code . 15 There is a matter on that issue about the water 16 size connection, water service pipelines . Staff 17 initially was recommending one and a half inch -- 18 one and a quarter inch, which the Building Code 19 Update Committee recommended. We were looking at 20 one and a half inch, and further explanation can 21 be given to you in our discussion. 22 We ' re adopting the Illinois Energy 23 Conservation Code 2009 . This code went into 24 effect January -- through January, 2010; it ' s DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 5 1 supposed to go into effect for all communities in 2 2010 . We were utilizing this as a state mandate, 3 so we ' re looking for no amendments to that code . 4 There is a 2009 International 5 Mechanical Code, the 2009 International Property 6 Maintenance Code, the 2009 International Fire 7 Code, and you get into the area that we ' re all 8 probably here to discuss, the 2009 International 9 Residential Code . 10 This code is a minimum code, all the 11 codes are minimum codes, and they' re requiring 12 fire suppression sprinkler systems in residential 13 homes . That ' s something that the Building Code 14 Update Committee decided to not put into this 15 code . 16 Staff is looking to put it into the 17 code so that we ' re not less restrictive and we ' re 18 looking at possibly any new home that ' s built, 19 3, 500 square feet or more, would be required to 20 have a fire suppression system. 21 We ' re looking at the 2009 22 International Building Code and the 2009 23 International existing building code . 24 The one code that Staff really wants DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 6 1 to emphasize is the Electrical Code in our 2 discussions . The recommendation was made to 3 approve the 2008 National Electrical Code . That 4 code is harmonious with the 2009 series of the I 5 codes . 6 The Building Code Update Committee 7 decided to go to the 2005 code; Staff is still 8 recommending the 2008 . 9 Jeremy Canavan, who is with the 10 Bristol-Kendall Fire District, was our 11 chairperson. If you ' ll come up . He has a 12 presentation and he will discuss the fire 13 suppression system, and I have in the audience 14 Dick Blondin from B & F Technical Services to 15 answer more specific code questions that you might 16 have . Turn it over to Jeremy. 17 MR. CANAVAN: Good evening, everybody. 18 Before the video begins, as Krysti said, we were 19 working on these codes for quite a while and it 20 was my pleasure to chair the committee . I learned 21 a lot from that . 22 One of the biggest topics obviously 23 was the residential fire sprinklers . The City 24 came back and said that we would like to have a DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 7 1 3, 500 square foot threshold. Obviously I would 2 like to have the zero threshold as the code says . 3 Any time you make a code less stringent, it sets 4 yourself up for lawsuits and what not . 5 So with that, I would like to 6 present a video, it ' s real short, and then I will 7 talk to you real quick and we ' ll go from there . 8 (Video presentation . ) 9 MR. CANAVAN: Thanks for your patience 10 everybody, appreciate that . So our fire chief, 11 Bristol-Kendall Fire, had a house recently built 12 and he put a fire sprinkler system in . It was a 13 little more expensive than $1500, it was 6500? 14 $6, 500, but he did that because he believes in 15 fire sprinklers . He believes that it ' s good for 16 our community. 17 So just real quick, I wrote 18 something down here . I 'm not a good speech guy, 19 so I apologize . Residential sprinklers not only 20 provide additional protection on top of the 21 required smoke detectors for those that live in 22 the home, but they also protect those firefighters 23 who will be called to that home . 24 Recently we 've seen and heard news DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 8 1 reports about people dying in single family homes 2 where they were trapped and unable to save their 3 lives and save themselves . 4 These fatalities usually occur with 5 a phenomenon known as flashover. Flashover is 6 that time during a fire when anything that can 7 burn ignites . Residential sprinklers control the 8 fire during its inception stage and prevent 9 flashover . 10 Residential fire sprinklers can 11 provide additional protection for young children 12 less than five years of age and adults over 65 13 that are statistically at a higher risk and may be 14 unable to escape a house fire on their own or even 15 with some smoke detectors . 16 If saving lives isn ' t enough, 17 residential sprinklers also reduce fire and smoke 18 damage to the structure and personal property. As 19 a result, families are allowed to return to their 20 homes usually the same day with minor clean-up . 21 With our public forum, we have an 22 insurance gentleman here . Insurance companies are 23 saying that they are for fire sprinklers . 24 Obviously they would much rather replace your DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 9 1 carpets and furniture than the structure itself . 2 And, additionally, we also had a 3 side-by-side demo similar to that one in October 4 at Hoover Forest Preserve . We had that fire out 5 in 27 seconds, quick mop up . They probably could 6 have been in that home in less than a day. 7 The other side of the building, we 8 simulated a fire department response . Six 9 minutes, the structure was gone . Nobody is going 10 to survive that fire . 11 So that ' s my presentation . I 12 appreciate your time . Thank you . 13 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Do we have any public 14 comment on the building code update? 15 MR. McCUE : Yes . My name is Billy McCue 16 with McCue Builders . Just a couple of comments on 17 the video there, which I agree, I mean, there is 18 no price you can put on a life, but, you know, 19 just a couple misleading things . It ' s amazing how 20 they can tweak. 21 You know, the smoke detector was not 22 in the bedroom, which is code, so why they put a 23 presentation together that doesn ' t have a smoke 24 detector in the bedroom, I think it said it took DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 10 1 30 seconds for the one in the hall to go off, you 2 know, just -- you know, you 've got guys that ' s 3 trying to show why they want to do something and 4 make something so misleading just to me doesn ' t 5 make sense . It gets me going just watching it . 6 But, you know, they talk about cost, 7 $1 , 500 to $2500, and I ' ll talk a little bit about 8 it, but it ' s much more than that . It ' s in the ten 9 of thousands . Some houses could be $20 , 000 . And 10 I 'm not making any of this up . 11 I 'm a builder . We built a house -- 12 There ' s other things that go along with it . The 13 insurance companies, yes, they are in -- they are 14 in favor for it as long as you have the fire alarm 15 system to go along with it, so if you ' re on 16 vacation and not in that house, if a head 17 accidently goes off, they' re going to notify the 18 fire department, so they' re there, if it ' s not a 19 fire, they' re going to put this out, where if you 20 don ' t have the fire alarm system, that water is 21 going to run for -- until someone gets there, and 22 I would think that your homeowner ' s insurance is 23 going to charge you a lot more if you don ' t pay 24 for this fire alarm system, which is another DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 11 1 $1, 500 on top of the sprinkler system that I 2 didn ' t even have in the price . 3 But again, I 've been building here 4 in Yorkville for 20 years . I 've built -- I 've 5 built over 600 homes, 300 of them have been in the 6 Yorkville school district, and just to kind of 7 show you which -- I mean, you guys know where 8 building has went in the last few years . 9 Between 2003 to 2005, I built 165 10 homes in the Yorkville school district; from ' 09 11 until now, I built 11 . That ' s 154 homes less with 12 the economy changing. Land values have dropped 70 13 to 80 percent from 2005 . I mean, a hundred 14 thousand dollar lot is now at 20 to $30, 000 . 15 Me as a builder, I mean, we are 16 making 50 percent less, ballparking, on what we 17 used to make when we built homes in ' 05 . 18 The subcontractors, they can ' t even 19 buy material . I 'm using the same guys that I 20 started with 20 years ago for the most part, and I 21 have to buy the material because these guys can ' t 22 get loans because of how slow the market is, and, 23 you know, with all this happening, you know, now 24 we ' re talking about adding 10 to $15, 000 to the DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 12 1 cost of a house . 2 And, you know, I agree, a life -- 3 there ' s no price, but accidents are going to 4 happen no matter what we do, but, I mean, the 5 people -- Yorkville, the city, they voted for the 6 bike trail . I mean, they didn ' t want to pay ten 7 to $25 a year for the bike path and we ' re trying 8 to stick somebody for 10, 000 to $15, 000? You 9 know, it just doesn ' t make sense . 10 If we had this -- There ' s not many 11 builders here tonight, and if this meeting was in 12 2005, there ' d be 30 to 50 builders here . There ' s 13 none left . Most of the guys -- there ' s very few 14 builders left, and we ' re just, you know, going to 15 make things worse if this happens . 16 In my 20 years, other than building 17 a house for the fire chief just recently, I 18 haven ' t had one person who wanted to put a 19 sprinkler system in their house . Not one . 20 I sit down, I sign every contract . 21 I prob -- I 've built 600 homes, I 've probably met 22 with 5, 000 people . Not one person has ever wanted 23 to put a sprinkler system in their home . 24 You know, we ' ll put -- We ' re a DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 13 1 custom builder . I mean, they want a three-car 2 garage, two-car garage, they want a basement, they 3 want a two-story, they want a brick front, I mean, 4 we ' ll do anything they want . Not one person has 5 wanted a sprinkler system. 6 You know, this has kind of been 7 brewing for a couple years, and I 've talked to a 8 lot of people here in Yorkville, you know, over 9 the last couple years and everywhere, and even the 10 people we have built for, not one of them would 11 put up a sprinkler system. I mean, you can put a 12 survey in the record. Nobody wants one in their 13 home . 14 I had a brother that ' s a fireman, I 15 have a cousin, my best friend. You ask -- I 've 16 asked so many firemen what they think about it and 17 they' re -- it ' s the same reaction from all of 18 them. They roll their eyes and they' re like it ' s 19 overkill, smoke detectors save lives . 20 My brother, about seven years ago, 21 when Yorkville looked to -- when they moved to 22 make it mandatory to put them in duplexes, I was 23 looking at doing Prairie Gardens and so I put some 24 time into sprinkler systems, and it was the same DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 14 1 thing back then . I was told it was going to cost 2 a thousand dollars . It was -- started at $4, 500 3 and got up to $5, 000 for these townhomes, but 4 everything my brother gave me in these books is 5 sprinkler systems are designed to save the 6 buildings and smoke detectors are what save lives . 7 And I can get some emails I 've got 8 overwhelming in the last couple days from 9 different builders . I belong to the Northern Home 10 Builders Association, and statistics on the newer 11 homes, there ' s few -- less fires in your newer 12 homes, the problems are in the homes that are 13 30 years old, and that ' s what a lot of these 14 things talk about . 15 But cost, as I talked about the 16 chief ' s house, was 2100 -- 2141 was the square 17 footage, a small three bedroom ranch. $6, 500 is 18 what it cost . We did use a little bit more 19 expensive head that is a flush mount on the wall 20 so it doesn ' t stick out, which I would think you 21 have to use in new homes so kids don ' t throw balls 22 and hit them. 23 But along with that, in Yorkville, 24 the water line is a one-inch water line and that DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 15 1 doesn ' t bring enough water to the house for the 2 sprinkler system, so we ' re looking at bringing 3 another inch and a half, which is going to add big 4 cost . 5 If we have to connect to the water 6 mains, which are on the opposite side of the 7 street, you could be looking at $60, 000 just to 8 bore underneath the street and bring it back. 9 But with getting a fire alarm 10 system, which isn ' t code, but I think if you 11 get -- and Jeremy will tell you, if you get a 12 sprinkler system, you should have a fire alarm 13 system hooked up which is going to detect if the 14 heads go off . That ' s $1, 200 . 15 And then you ' re looking at yearly 16 fees . Your alarm system, it ' s $35 a month. 17 Someone is going to have to come out once a year 18 for $85 and check the system. To have the 19 sprinkler system flushed is $150, that ' s going to 20 have to be done every year . So there ' s a lot of 21 upkeep . 22 But, you know, my guess is -- and I 23 haven ' t gotten a price on a 3200 square foot home, 24 but you ' re going to be looking at $12, 000, and DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 16 1 that ' s not if you don ' t have to connect to the 2 water main, which could be anywhere from four to 3 $6, 000 . So I think they ' re a little misleading on 4 the cost . 5 You know, it ' s just another cost 6 that the homeowners are going to have to finance . 7 You know, if it ' s 10, 000 to 15, 000, you can almost 8 double that cost for a 30-year mortgage . 9 You know, as I said, we can ' t get 10 homes to appraise now. With all of the costs, 11 with land dropping, with us making less, we can ' t 12 get houses to appraise right now, and they ' re -- 13 So how are we going to add this? 14 I don ' t even know if I would be able 15 to get a loan -- I -- the banks will only lend us 16 so much money to build a house, and if we ' ve got 17 to put another 10 to 15, 000 in it, it ' s more money 18 that we ' re going to have to come up with upfront . 19 I mean, I just think it will -- it will shut down 20 new construction . 21 I use, probably more than any other 22 builder -- well, me being here in Yorkville, I 23 live in Bristol now, but I buy my lumber, my 24 windows, my trim, my door knobs, I use local DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 17 1 banks, local title companies, my concrete guy 2 lives here in Yorkville, my framer, my surveyor, 3 my shelving guy, my drywall . I mean, just about 4 everything I get is here in Yorkville, and you ' re 5 just going to put the hurt to them that much more . 6 And thank you for your time . 7 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you. Anyone 8 else? 9 MR. DYSELL : My name is Fred Dysell, 10 River ' s Edge subdivision . Regarding the fire code 11 with the sprinkler systems, it ' s a waste of money. 12 I 'm a 30-year career firefighter retired from the 13 Aurora Fire Department, Battalion Chief retired. 14 The fire department should be 15 trained to do interior attacks on a fire . We had 16 a fire in our subdivision just two weeks ago, 17 attic fire . It should have been addressed 18 properly. 19 The sprinkler system situation that 20 was addressed here on the videotape would have 21 never addressed that because it was in the attic, 22 there is no fire load up there, so it would have 23 been a waste of money in that situation . 24 Bottom line is teach the fire DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 18 1 department training for interior attacks . That ' s 2 what they get paid for . It ' s not essential to 3 have a sprinkler system built in a house . 4 Fire alarms, smoke alarms, are the 5 best thing that ever happened to the fire service, 6 and that ' s the way it should -- It should stay 7 that way, so -- Hope I can help. 8 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you, Fred. 9 Jesse, do you have something? 10 MR. ALANIZ : Yes, sir . 11 MAYOR GOLINSKI : This is only on the 12 building code update . 13 MR. ALANIZ : Yes, Your Honor . 14 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Okay. 15 MR. ALANIZ : Your Honor, I 've held many 16 jobs . I 've been working full-time since I was 17 16 years old. Before becoming a marketing 18 assistant, the last job that I did was being in 19 industrial maintenance, and I took several classes 20 over at Waubonsee Community College, also took a 21 class on the National Electrical Code, studied all 22 the other codes . They were part of our 23 curricular . 24 Your Honor, every time government DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 19 1 steps in for the greater good, for the common 2 good, for the safety of the people, there ' s 3 always -- There ' s no price that you can put on 4 this, on the sprinkler system. That ' s fine, let 5 the manufacturer pay for it if it ' s -- if there 6 is -- if they value life so much. 7 I say this for a reason . When I 8 took my class on the National Electrical Code, 9 there were people there who had submitted 10 suggestions for this electrical code . 11 One of them, this person wasn ' t 12 there, but they told us the story of a new wall 13 outlet . You put it near your curtains where the 14 windows are, so if it rains, the water comes in -- 15 same thing, they show the very same thing. The 16 water comes in, it shorts out, flash, your 17 curtains are on fire . 18 We ' ve got to have that outlet in 19 there, we 've got to make it code, for the greater 20 good of the people . The person that put that part 21 of that code in there was the manufacturer of the 22 outlet itself. Now I have to question, is it a 23 question of safety or is it a question of profit? 24 The other thing, as the builder DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 20 1 says -- and while I have all respect for the fire 2 department for wanting to do things safely, we ' re 3 invading on his privacy. We ' re invading on his 4 liberty to build. 5 I think Ronald Reagan said it best 6 when he quoted Lao Tzu, Every year we create more 7 criminals and tax cheats by the government ' s 8 creation of new codes and laws and regulations . 9 Your Honor, I -- If it ' s a question 10 of public safety and everything and if this is 11 something that ' s really good for our community and 12 everything, let it be voluntarily. You know, 13 educate the public, make -- make an offer out 14 there to them, educate them on what it ' s all 15 about, make offers to them what the costs are, but 16 I don ' t think this is government ' s place to be 17 stepping in . 18 Your Honor, I yield the floor . 19 Thank you, sir . 20 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you, Jesse . 21 Anyone else? 22 MR. SKINNER: Hi . My name is Mike 23 Skinner . I was on the committee for the Building 24 Code Committee . I was part of the group that DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 21 1 voted against having sprinklers put in . I 'm also 2 a builder here in Yorkville . I 'm also on the 3 Zoning Board of Appeals here in Yorkville . I, 4 too, have been here for almost 30 years, so I have 5 a vested interest . 6 I am in a unique spot where because 7 I live in a sprinkled home that I built . I live 8 in a duplex . I was required to put sprinklers in . 9 Unlike the video there, it wasn ' t 10 1500 to $2, 000 . Mine was 9, 000 per side, 18, 000 11 per building, for 1650 square feet . It was a 12 little more because I did put better heads in . 13 My basement was sprinkled so that 14 when I finished it, the bedrooms were sprinkled as 15 per code as they should be . It was designed that 16 way. 17 If I were to build that same home 18 right now, I couldn ' t . I couldn ' t build that same 19 design, the same vaulted ceilings . I couldn ' t do 20 it because the codes have changed. 21 First of all, as Billy said, I don ' t 22 have the water service coming into my house . I 23 would have to bore under Walsh Drive . A sewer 24 tap -- or a water tap for both units add about -- DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 22 1 on a duplex now, you ' re looking at about $6, 000 2 for the length . The building is a little bit shy. 3 About 6, 000 . 4 Then, because I have vaulted 5 ceilings, the new codes would not allow me to put 6 sprinklers in -- or put vaulted ceilings in. You 7 can ' t put them up there unless they go to what ' s 8 called a dry system. 9 You need to be educated a little bit 10 on different types of sprinkler systems . You have 11 a wet system, which is the system is always wet . 12 There ' s always water in it . Fire goes off, the 13 sprinkler head goes off . You knock the head off, 14 your kids are playing baseball in the basement, 15 water goes off . 16 You have another one that has glycol 17 in it, which is -- allows you to put the sprinkler 18 head up here in the ceiling and it won ' t freeze . 19 More money to put it in, requires more 20 maintenance, must be flushed yearly. 21 The other way is called a dry 22 system. There is air in the lines, sprinkler head 23 goes off for whatever reason, fire, kid knocks it 24 off, there ' s no water in the line . You have an DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 23 1 air compressor in your basement that pumps the 2 water up there . Very expensive system. 3 But right now, if you want to put 4 this kind of ceiling, you can ' t, unless you go 5 with a very expensive sprinkler system, either a 6 dry system or a glycol system. It has to be 7 maintained every year. I ' ll get to that in a 8 minute, how we ' re going to maintain it . 9 The other thing is, as far as the 10 insurance companies go, I got $175 a year break on 11 my homeowner ' s policy. That ' s -- Per half . I own 12 both sides . But if I wanted the water protection 13 service, it was another 165 -- excuse me, $165 a 14 year, so I saved $10 a year for a $9, 000 15 investment . Not a very good return . 16 Let ' s talk about building a little 17 bit . Homes are built -- I haven ' t built as many 18 as Billy has, not 600, I wish, but Billy builds 19 good homes . We all build good homes because we ' re 20 forced to by the building codes we currently have . 21 We have draft stop, we have smoke 22 detectors in every room, in every hallway, to let 23 people know there is a fire . As far as draft stop 24 goes, for those that don ' t know, between every DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 24 1 level in a home, between the basement/first floor, 2 first floor/second floor, if you have a second 3 floor, or first floor and up here, every 4 penetration in that wall, in that floor, has to be 5 fire caulked so no air can get down there, up the 6 wall, into the ceiling. No air, a fire can ' t 7 spread. 8 If you have a soffit going along up 9 here -- you know what soffits are -- it has to be 10 blocked off from the wall . 11 Codes are written now for safety 12 without sprinklers . Our homes are very safe . If 13 new homes burn, it ' s because of careless people . 14 I mean, we ' ll never be able to outlaw cigarette 15 smoking, lighters, and build concrete houses with 16 concrete furniture . We have to educate the 17 people . 18 But by telling the next person that 19 wants to move into Yorkville that he has to spend 20 a minimum of $12, 000 just to put a sprinkler in, I 21 would ask each and every one of you in this room 22 to put a sprinkler system in your own home . Spend 23 the money. Put it in . Okay? Show that you 24 really are behind it . I don ' t think you will . DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 25 1 So we build good homes now, they' re 2 safe, and I think we need to take a step back. 3 There may come a time when sprinklers will be 4 required throughout all of the United States just 5 like seatbelts are . Right now let ' s make it the 6 choice of the person that wants it . 7 If I built a duplex, would I put one 8 in? No . I couldn ' t afford it now, not in this 9 economy. When I sell my duplex, will I get that 10 $9, 000 back? No way. Absolutely not . 11 So do we want to cripple the people 12 that want to move into Yorkville, burden them with 13 something that may save lives? It will save 14 lives, back that up . It will save lives . But 15 it ' s their choice, they can do it if they want to 16 put it in . 17 But in the meantime, let ' s let them 18 make the choice, not this group of people here 19 saying you have to do it . Pass on sprinklers . 20 I want to talk a little bit about 21 the electrical outlets . Can we do that now? One 22 of the other things the Staff wants us to have is 23 arc fault breakers . 24 Arc fault breakers are if you pull DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 26 1 your plug out of the wall right there without 2 turning off your vacuum, your lamp, your electric 3 drill, it pops your breaker down in the basement . 4 Now, I know we 've been told that 5 they may have fixed them, but my last conversation 6 with Paul Zabel, who was our head of building and 7 zoning, said no, they' re not, they still have the 8 problem. 9 You unplug -- You are vacuuming in 10 your house and your plug unplugs from the wall, it 11 creates an arc and it trips the breaker down in 12 your basement . If you are in your garage, using 13 your Shop Vac . If you ' re using your drill, the 14 armature of the drill will trip the arc fault 15 breakers . And that ' s one of the codes we had 16 talked about wanting to adopt . Staff wants it, 17 our committee said no, we don ' t think it ' s a good 18 idea . 19 First of all, they don ' t work right 20 yet, so why would we adopt it? Secondly, give it 21 some time . I 'm a firm believer of withstanding 22 the test of time . Let them work the bugs out . In 23 three years, we can re -- we can look at it again . 24 Let ' s not jump on the bandwagon and DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 27 1 say oh, because some code committee propaganda 2 like this for our sprinklers says you ' ve got to do 3 it, Square D, who has lobbyists, says we should 4 spend hundreds and hundreds of dollars more on a 5 house besides the sprinklers to do this, I don ' t 6 think it ' s a good idea . 7 If somebody wants them, go ahead. 8 Right now they ' re currently required in bedrooms, 9 but they want them every outlet in the house, 10 throughout the whole house, and it ' s -- it ' s 11 overkill, so . . . 12 Well, I said my two cents ' worth . 13 Thank you . 14 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you, Mr . Skinner . 15 Anybody else? 16 MR. DAAB : Good evening Mr . Mayor, 17 members of the Council, the Staff . My name is 18 Jake Daab . I am manager of land acquisition and 19 development for the PulteGroup . We are currently 20 building in two subdivisions in Yorkville, Autumn 21 Creek and Bristol Bay. 22 The previous others who spoke spoke 23 far more eloquently to the whole process, so I ' ll 24 get down to the brass tacks . Our purchasing DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 28 1 department told me that adding sprinkler systems 2 to our existing product in Autumn Creek would add 3 at minimum $8, 000 per house . 4 We stand to lose buyers on hundred 5 dollar increments . Right now we ' re less than two 6 sales a month in Autumn Creek, less than one a 7 month in Bristol Bay. Adding 7, 000 plus, 8, 000, a 8 house could devastate our sales . You may not see 9 another sale in either one of those communities . 10 That ' s how fine the line we are in terms of our 11 profit margins and sales . In some instances we ' re 12 losing money. 13 So while I appreciate the spirit in 14 which the ordinance is intended, the bottom line 15 is our buyers in these communities cannot afford 16 an additional $8, 000 a house, and we will lose 17 sales and the City of Yorkville will lose permit 18 dollars . It ' s that simple . Thank you . 19 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you . 20 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Can I say 21 one more thing? 22 MAYOR GOLINSKI : After the young lady. 23 MS . DUBAJIC : I 'm Lynn Dubajic with 24 Yorkville Economic Development Corporation . As DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 29 1 many of you know, I recently attended the 2 International Shopping Center Show in Las Vegas . 3 I had many meetings with retailers while I was 4 there, and the message that I received from them 5 was that retailers have certainly slowed down, and 6 we know how important commercial is to our 7 community, and the retailers are interested in 8 working with communities that have set the stage 9 for encouraging residential development . 10 They certainly understand that 11 residential development has slowed down; they also 12 know that new home sales are competing with 13 foreclosures and short sales that are out there in 14 the community, so they would like to see -- And 15 you are one of the finalists for a store, and we 16 are actually being looked at by a couple of 17 retailers . 18 They want to see our community as 19 being one that is encouraging residential 20 development, new rooftops, because we know that 21 that drives commercial, and adopting this portion 22 of the code would certainly be counter-productive 23 to sending that message to the retailers out there 24 that are looking at us . DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 30 1 I also wanted to let you know that I 2 received a phone call today from Tim Dwyer, who 3 built seven homes in Yorkville last year and is on 4 task to build six homes on Yorkville this year. 5 He ' s in Colorado right now on a trip 6 with his family, but he wanted to let you know 7 that he felt that with certainty none of these 13 8 homes, the seven from last year or the six from 9 this year, would have been built if this policy 10 was in place . And he is a custom home builder as 11 well . 12 Also, I was a member of the building 13 code committee, and I also spoke with Adam Dontz 14 from Gladstone Builders, who is also a member, and 15 he also is unavailable -- not available to be here 16 tonight, but he also wanted to let all of you 17 know, as I do, that we feel very strongly that we 18 worked hard, our committee worked hard, and we 19 hope that you take all of our recommendations to 20 heart and you move forward with this with not 21 adopting this portion of the code . 22 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you . 23 MR. WEHRLI : Hi . My name is Ron Wehrli . 24 I own Crestview Builders . I am a developer in DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 31 1 Kendall County. I 've done five subdivisions in 2 the area . I 'm also a builder, I 've built over 3 1700 homes in the last 30 years . 4 Like Bill said, you cannot put a 5 price on life, but smoke alarms do -- do work. 6 We 've -- in 1700 homes, we 've not had one injury, 7 one death, related to fire . 8 In building out here, we took over a 9 subdivision here recently. I was a little 10 reluctant to do that, but there are a lot of good 11 people out here, I 'm from the area, so we went 12 ahead and did it . 13 Unfortunately in Yorkville the 14 permits alone are so high -- and I know you don ' t 15 want to hear this -- but Naperville ' s for the same 16 house is $8, 000, where I 'm paying $20, 000, so I 'm 17 12, 000 down there to begin with . 18 I 'm not selling anything out here, 19 but I am in Naperville . They have a subdivision 20 and a new model here . And the permits have to be 21 looked at . Another issue another day, whatever, 22 but now you ' re adding another minimum 12, 000 . 23 These figures the builders are giving are correct . 24 So now you ' re $25, 000 to build in DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 32 1 Yorkville . We haven ' t got one permit out of 2 Blackberry subdivision, we ' re too high, we ' re too 3 high on permits, and if you throw this on top of 4 it, that will close down also . 5 I am building. I still have lots, 6 there ' s homes going up . We ' re building in 7 Naperville, Plainfield, Kendall County. Haven ' t 8 sold one in Yorkville . You ' re too high on your 9 permits . You don ' t want to hear it, but that ' s 10 what ' s going to get rooftops in here . And then if 11 you throw this on top of it . . . 12 We were also grandfathered in 13 Blackberry where I saw this coming and we -- we 14 had it in writing that, you know, we would not be 15 getting smoke alarms in there . 16 So talking about a lawsuit waiting 17 to happen . Not threatening, but you guys did give 18 us that deal . How can you do that for us and not 19 everybody else? It ' s going to be a mess . 20 But the bottom line is you want 21 people to come in here from other communities . 22 Everybody -- Other towns, they' re working at it, 23 they' re low on their permits . I have yet to see 24 Yorkville do anything about this, and it ' s a DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 33 1 shame . That ' s all I have to say. Thank you . 2 (Enter Alderman Munns . ) 3 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you . 4 MR. KLERONOMOS : My name is Angelo 5 Kleronomos . I am president of Property Concepts . 6 We have offices in Oswego . Over the last 7 37 years, we built in excess of 4, 000 dwelling 8 units . 9 Unlike Bill, I did have a few 10 requests about the sprinkler systems, and when we 11 priced them out as an option, no one -- no one 12 took the option . 13 The film we saw is very compelling . 14 You have 5, 000 homes in Yorkville right now, some 15 of those homes were built 50, 70 years ago . 16 Certainly now with the materials available today, 17 with the direct wire smoke detector systems that 18 are available today, those homes may be more in 19 need of a sprinkler system than new homes we ' re 20 building today. 21 Will you require that to all the 22 existing homeowners in your community, in those 23 5, 000 homes? I don ' t think so . I -- you know, as 24 I said, the film was very compelling, but in this DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 34 1 market, in this time, I think it would be a hard 2 sell . I think you would see permits just drop off 3 to nothing in Yorkville . 4 You have communities around you that 5 are not adopting this type of an ordinance, and 6 that ' s not to say that life safety isn ' t an 7 important issue, but they also recognize the fact 8 that they have to keep their communities moving 9 forward. 10 I think the codes that you have in 11 place need to be enforced, not just in new home 12 construction, but in existing homes, and that ' s a 13 whole -- whole other area . 14 To close, in the 4, 000 dwelling 15 units that we built over 37 years, we never had a 16 fire that took a life . Most of those homes 17 complied with local building codes and fire codes 18 and had smoke detectors and alarm systems in them. 19 I think, you know, you 've got -- 20 you 've got a good plan, but I think this is 21 just -- it ' s reaching. It ' s going -- it ' s going 22 to price homes out of the market . Thank you . 23 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you . 24 MR. NEYER: Good evening. My name is DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 35 1 Gary Neyer . I work for Marker, Inc . We 've 2 developed two subdivisions in Yorkville of 3 approximately a total of 500 lots . We sell to 4 local builders . 5 I think it ' s important as a 6 governing body that you look at the big picture 7 here . Mr . Wehrli spoke well about all the costs 8 involved in not only building a home, but 9 developing a project as well . 10 Please don ' t focus on just the issue 11 of fire sprinklers . When you ' re updating your 12 codes, you 've got the cost of the electrical 13 upgrades that are required, you ' re going to now 14 enforce the 2009 Energy Code . Keep in mind the 15 additional costs that that ' s going to bring to 16 building a single family home, and to all those 17 costs, please keep in mind the fee increases that 18 have taken place say in the last five to 19 six years . 20 All told, the price of a new home in 21 Yorkville needs to be competitive with the 22 surrounding communities . I 'm not here to tell you 23 that sprinkler systems are a bad thing, but if 24 they ' re a good thing, why do we have to be on the DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 36 1 cutting edge of requiring those systems when the 2 communities around us are not? 3 You will have -- If you adopt these 4 codes verbatim, you will have the best, most 5 recent codes and absolutely no homes to be built 6 underneath them because no one can afford them to 7 be built . Thank you . 8 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you. Anyone 9 else? 10 MR. LINK: My name is Jeff Link and I 've 11 lived in Yorkville for 18 years . I 'm just talking 12 from a banking perspective . Somebody had 13 mentioned about the appraisal issues . 14 I 'm in the mortgage business and 15 I 've been doing it for 22 years . We have 16 appraisal issues as it is getting values in, as 17 you ' re probably aware . Values have been dropping. 18 Somebody who would be paying for 19 sprinkler systems would have to be pretty much 20 paid completely out of their pocket because they 21 wouldn ' t qualify in their mortgage if they came 22 for a mortgage . 23 We ' re having a lot of people right 24 now that are having a hard time, granted, new DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 37 1 construction and existing just getting values to 2 be where they are . If they' re spending $15, 000 or 3 even ten, they' re not going to exceed the value of 4 the appraisal, so from an underwriting standpoint, 5 it ' s just not going to happen, and we ' re having a 6 hard enough time getting new starts in Yorkville 7 as it is and people are going right now -- from 8 what I 'm seeing anyway, are going FHA with two and 9 a half percent down, three and a half percent 10 down, so I don ' t know who is going to be able to 11 afford these sprinklers systems . It ' s not an 12 option. That ' s all I have to say on that from a 13 banking perspective . 14 Appraisals are huge issues right 15 now. We ' re having a hard time getting values to 16 come in just to keep people in their homes, and 17 it ' s hard enough as you know, with all the 18 foreclosures that going on . So thank you. 19 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you. Anyone else 20 who hasn ' t spoken yet? Jeremy, do you want to add 21 something else? 22 MR. CANAVAN: Yeah. I just wanted to 23 address some of the things that was brought up . 24 Nowhere in the code requires you to upgrade your DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 38 1 water service, so the existing water service is 2 fine . It ' s a design issue . 3 The chief ' s house we had to upgrade 4 because of the types of sprinkler heads he used. 5 They were on the market for less than a month. So 6 now they've been on the market for a little while 7 longer, they've been able to design it 8 differently, so upgrading the water service is not 9 an issue . 10 As far as dry systems in a house, 11 it ' s not in the code and it doesn ' t make any 12 sense, so that should be a non-issue . 13 Glycol is no longer allowed in 14 residential fire sprinklers, so that shouldn ' t be 15 an issue either . 16 As far as maintenance, the code 17 itself does not require annual testing of your 18 fire -- residential fire sprinklers . The plumbing 19 code asks that you test your backflow preventer, 20 and what Bristol Bay is doing is they' re putting 21 that in their HOA so the whole community is paying 22 for that, for the backflow preventer price . 23 You know, P2904, which is the 24 residential fire code in the IRC, is a minimum DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 39 1 code, so any time you lessen that code, like I 2 said earlier, you ' re setting yourself up for a 3 lawsuit . Any time you have a loss -- and maybe 4 the City attorney can help -- you know, if you 5 have a loss -- No? 6 MS . ORR: No . 7 MR. CANAVAN: Okay. So you can make a 8 code less stringent -- 9 MS . ORR: Yes . 10 MR. CANAVAN: -- and there is no 11 legal -- 12 MS . ORR: No . 13 MR. CANAVAN: Okay. Okay. Well, I 14 think I would disagree with that, but you ' re the 15 attorney and I 'm not, so . . . 16 You know, the thing is, you know, if 17 you build a house less than the national minimum 18 and we have a fire death and we have a significant 19 loss, who are they going to look for? I mean, 20 they' re going to look for the city council that 21 made that code less stringent . 22 So look for your experiences . I 23 know some of you have seen demonstrations, I know 24 some of you have homes that have fire sprinklers . DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 40 1 We 've even had an alderman that started a fire for 2 us for a demonstration, so, you know, I would just 3 beg that you don ' t make the code less stringent . 4 And I think all these builders here, 5 I mean, they have so much experience, so much 6 dedication to the community, and so do I, and 7 it ' s -- this fight -- or I shouldn ' t say fight . 8 This debate hasn ' t started here and it won ' t end 9 here . 10 It ' s already in the 2012 codes, and 11 those codes are developed by building officials 12 and firefighters and contractors and all people 13 from all walks of life that are developing these 14 codes, so I just hope you look at that, and, you 15 know, if there is anything that you need from me 16 that can educate you more or educate anybody in 17 this room, I have an open door, so, please, I 'm 18 here to serve . So that ' s it . Thank you . 19 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you. All right . 20 The City Council is going to have a chance to 21 discuss this when it comes back to us, but -- All 22 right, someone else? 23 MR. MICHAELS : Excuse me . I 'm Sean 24 Michaels, I am employed at McCue Builders . DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 41 1 Not to argue with Jeremy, but the 2 way you look at the line service going into a home 3 is based on the number of fixtures, and with the 4 size homes that we ' re building in Yorkville, we ' re 5 very close in needing to increase the water line 6 size, but then you start adding a sprinkler 7 system, that could justify a larger sprinkler -- 8 or a larger water line . 9 One thing I ' d like to point out 10 is -- Billy didn ' t mention it, but he did lose a 11 family member to a fire, and so if anybody has 12 personal experience, he does, and for him to be 13 arguing against a sprinkler system I think tells 14 you that, you know, he ' s seen both sides of it and 15 can tell you personally how it ' s affected his 16 family. 17 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you, Sean . Okay, 18 anyone else from the audience on the building code 19 update? 20 MR. McCUE : Since Jeremy went up there 21 twice, I 'm coming up twice . 22 One thing that I did forget to 23 mention is, you know, we can go on all day, but 24 you talk about the people that make up the codes DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 42 1 that we follow, you know, if they' re looking at 2 the codes they want to come up with, if there is 3 no cost involved in their decision, then, you 4 know, we ' re going to be here in five years and 5 fighting people because they' re going to want 6 elevators in homes . I mean, where is it going to 7 end? 8 I mean, someone told me that you ' ve 9 got four -- four to five times better of dying 10 from falling in an accident than dying in a fire, 11 and this is what I was told at the Northern 12 Illinois Home Builders ' meeting. 13 You know, tell us we can ' t build 14 two-story homes, you know, we can ' t put basements 15 in, no stairs . I mean, where is it going to end? 16 You 've heard from other builders 17 that, you know, there hasn ' t been a death in a new 18 home, and, you know, I didn ' t want to bring it up, 19 but yes, my sister lost an 18-month old baby in a 20 fire with a three-year old. 21 It was about an 800-square foot 22 home, two bedrooms upstairs, two -- two rooms on 23 the first floor, but the smoke detector wasn ' t 24 even -- there was no smoke detector . DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 43 1 You know, she was sitting on the 2 front porch, so, you know, a smoke detector, a 3 working smoke detector would have saved their 4 life, and that ' s what you hear all the time, is 5 what smoke detectors do, and, if anything, I 'm all 6 for adding work, but thank you, and I guess I can 7 sign my name now. 8 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you. Again, I 9 was going to say, we can talk now, we ' re going to 10 discuss this again when it comes back to us, but 11 right now is a good opportunity because we have 12 all these experts here, so open it up to Council 13 if we have questions and comments, but, like I 14 said, we ' ll be coming back to it . 15 ALDERMAN SPEARS : I just want to say 16 that I also served on that committee, and the 17 majority of people that were on that committee 18 were builders or had something -- they were 19 directly involved with the home builders ' 20 industry, and I just wanted to address some of the 21 information that we received. 22 If the chief ' s house cost $6, 500 to 23 put in a state-of-the-art sprinkler system, I 24 mean, he even had the heads that were -- matched DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 44 1 furniture and it was just beautiful . He went 2 above and beyond what most people would do . 3 But, yet Mr. McCue is quoting us a 4 price of 10 , 000 to 15, 000, and to me that ' s quite 5 a difference . We have the actual price that -- 6 Mr . McCue built the house and that was the actual 7 figure, and we had the police chief confirm that, 8 number one . 9 The other thing is at the beginning 10 of this committee when we all met, we did have one 11 representative from the Northern Homes Building 12 Association, and he was talking about a home that 13 he built, I believe it was in Downers Grove, and 14 he ended up quoting a very, very extremely high 15 figure for a sprinkler system, and he brought in a 16 quote from a manufacturer of the sprinkler system, 17 and we questioned where the other request for bids 18 were and he said, oh, no, he only got one, which I 19 kind of doubt if anybody only gets one quote if 20 they' re really trying to cut costs . 21 And then the chief also questioned 22 him and reviewed the quote that he brought in, and 23 I believe he had copper piping and things that 24 weren ' t necessary, very, very expensive items on DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 45 1 this quote, so we kind of, you know, threw that 2 one out the window . 3 And I just want to address some of 4 the information that we received. Oh, Mr. McCue 5 also said that he didn ' t have one person that -- 6 and he is a custom builder, a very good builder, 7 but he never had one person that requested the 8 sprinkler system, never asked for that, and after 9 him speaking, I think if somebody did say, you 10 know, what do you think about the sprinkler 11 system, and I think his response definitely would 12 be all negative, and, therefore, they wouldn ' t 13 want a sprinkler system, and I can understand 14 that . 15 MR. McCUE : Do you want me to give you 16 what I think? 17 ALDERMAN SPEARS : Not yet . 18 MR. McCUE : Okay. 19 ALDERMAN SPEARS : You ' ll get your turn 20 again I 'm sure . Fire alarm system, you also 21 quoted that you would have to have a fire alarm 22 system with a sprinkler system for -- Those were 23 your words . We have that on tape . 24 MR. McCUE : I didn ' t say you have to, DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 46 1 you should. 2 ALDERMAN SPEARS : Well, you said -- 3 MR. McCUE : Jeremy told me that . 4 ALDERMAN SPEARS : -- the insurance 5 company would not honor one without the other, and 6 I worked for an insurance company and I never 7 heard that . Never . 8 MR. McCUE : We heard that in a meeting 9 time after time from Jeremy. 10 ALDERMAN MUNNS : This is a public 11 comment, not a debate, right? 12 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Right . Right . So hold 13 the comments, please . 14 ALDERMAN SPEARS : Okay. Let ' s see . Oh, 15 and the big issue was the arc fault breakers . We 16 also had two experts in this meeting, I mean, we 17 just -- it was educational, and they were two 18 experts, I believe -- and, Krysti, you can help me 19 with this -- one was teaching at -- 20 MS . NOBLE : Yes . One was a licensed 21 electrical worker and did teach for a local 22 community, as well as installed, and the one was a 23 building commissioner . 24 ALDERMAN SPEARS : And after all the DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 47 1 debate with the builders and these two gentlemen, 2 it was just educational for all of us, I just 3 asked them upfront, if you were building a home 4 today, would you have these arc fault breakers in 5 your own personal home, and both of them replied 6 immediately yes, we would, that is the way to go . 7 So, again, my opinion with serving 8 on this committee is a lot of the objections were 9 based on costs, and I can understand that, but 10 serving on this Council as many years as I have, 11 most of the years I was on the Public Safety 12 Committee and I -- again, you cannot put a price 13 on a life, and if you just save one life with a 14 sprinkler system, to me it ' s well worth it . 15 Autumn Creek, the gentleman from 16 Autumn Creek I believe said that we ' re going to 17 lose sales because you can ' t afford it and that ' s 18 what your people had told you, and I can 19 understand that, but also -- and I 'm going to look 20 it up again, I didn ' t bring the documents with 21 me -- but Autumn Creek I believe advertises in 22 another state that they have the sprinkler systems 23 and things like that in their homes . Don ' t quote 24 me on that until I bring the document in . DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 48 1 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Well, I 'm 2 sure we do . 3 ALDERMAN SPEARS : Okay. But, I mean, 4 that was your big selling point, and a lot of 5 people were I 'm sure building with that in mind 6 because Pulte -- 7 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Because 8 they ' re required by code there, new sales -- 9 UNIDENTIFIED AUDIENCE MEMBER: Can I say 10 something? 11 MAYOR GOLINSKI : No, hold on . Hold on, 12 guys . All right . Keep your comments from the 13 floor . If you want to be recognized, you can 14 after Rose is done, please . 15 ALDERMAN SPEARS : And I just have a few 16 more . We have been getting some builders in here 17 and developers that were complaining about our 18 permit fees being too high and we should do 19 something with that at this time, and I think that 20 we made some deals with some people . 21 I believe in Blackberry we had 22 special things going on there, we granted them 23 certain things and they were supposed to be 24 building and it ' s not happening, and we had a DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 49 1 gentleman here from Marker that said keep in mind 2 that the city is adding the 2009 energy code . 3 Well, it ' s not our decision . That ' s 4 state mandated. You all have to abide by that, no 5 matter where you are in the state, whether it ' s 6 Yorkville or not, so I don ' t think we can use that 7 as a debate . 8 And again, we had Property Concepts 9 indicate that, well, he believes that code should 10 be enforced also in all existing homes, and I 11 would totally agree with that, and I think every 12 builder that has built that home should go back 13 and reconstruct it all . 14 It should be up to the builders 15 then, if you ' re going to throw it into the City, 16 and let you handle the expense, because I think 17 that ' s a great idea and I ' d love to see that in 18 all your homes, and mine as well, and I think that 19 may be it . That ' s all I have . 20 MAYOR GOLINSKI : George? 21 ALDERMAN GILSON: I want to speak 22 towards the flip side of Rose ' s opinion . I agree 23 with the majority of the comments out in the -- in 24 this meeting. DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 50 1 I was also at the demonstration 2 where they showed -- you know, where they lit the 3 fire and they show what sprinklers can do, and I 4 guess I ' d like to go through some of this and talk 5 about some of the things that they hit on and 6 maybe expound on them a little more . 7 First of all, upsizing a line from 8 one inch to an inch and a quarter or inch and a 9 half is overkill for a home . A standard home 10 nowadays uses ten gallons per minute, okay? Ten 11 gallons per minute is plenty of water for a home . 12 So to mandate that we in these codes 13 talk about inch and a quarter or inch and a half 14 being new standard for water service line, there 15 is a cost to that, and that cost not only falls 16 upon them, but it falls upon us . 17 We 've got -- And I know because I 'm 18 in the industry. Our company makes products for 19 that . There ' s a huge cost to go from one inch to 20 inch and a quarter to inch and a half . So not 21 only are we putting the cost on the home builders, 22 we ' re putting the cost on the residents . Then 23 we ' re going to put a cost on our own city council 24 to purchase materials and things to adapt to those DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 51 1 new sizes . That ' s the number one thing that we 2 need to keep in check. 3 The other thing that we need to talk 4 about in here is some of this -- the things about 5 maintenance, backflow protection . I know backflow 6 protectors, I know RPZs, I know double checks, I 7 know dual checks . 8 The minimum that needs to be put in 9 for these things is a double check or an RPZ . 10 Those are very expensive, number one, so that 11 expense once again is going to fall upon the 12 homeowner . Okay? 13 The other thing that is going to be 14 an ongoing expense annually, which I mentioned in 15 the meeting, is that backflow protection has to 16 be -- it has to be inspected and it has to be 17 maintained and eventually it will have to be 18 replaced. 19 That is going to cost somewhere, 20 roundabouts, a hundred dollars a year directly out 21 of the homeowner ' s pocket to have that mandate put 22 on them, and I just don ' t think it ' s a good time 23 to do that . I just think that ' s -- I don ' t think 24 it ' s a wise decision to move forward with that . DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 52 1 Just bear with me a minute . We 2 talked about the cost of what it ' s going to add to 3 a home and, I mean, let ' s take conservatively 4 $5, 000 to the price of a new home . I know my 5 home, I 've lost equity like crazy. My home is 6 probably worth what I bought it for now. 7 To put $5, 000 more onto the cost of 8 a new home when people are trying to figure out 9 how they' re going to -- how they ' re going to 10 preserve or get back to their nest egg which they 11 thought they purchased, I just don ' t think that is 12 something we should move forward, and like I said, 13 I 'm being conservative at $5, 000 . I 'm hearing 10, 14 12 , whatever it maybe . 15 I just don ' t think we should add 16 that cost and put that burden on the home builders 17 and the homeowners and people that already have 18 homes that have lost value . It ' s just something I 19 just don ' t see a sense in doing right now. 20 Just bear with me . I mean, at the 21 time to discuss this all amongst Council, I ' ll go 22 through this code by code, but I just think what 23 they' re saying is very accurate . 24 I do see the value in what we saw DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 53 1 out there, but I just think -- I agree with the 2 fact that the smoke detectors are what ' s going to 3 save the lives, and I think that going forward 4 this is just a bad idea, so to keep it brief and 5 not discuss all these individually, it will come 6 time, but if you look around, Rose, and if you 7 look at some of the ones in the building code 8 inquiry where they list the cities, one, two, 9 three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, 10 11, 12 out of one, two, three, four, five, six, 11 seven, eight, nine, ten -- wait . One, two, three, 12 four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, 11, 12 . 13 12 of them out of all the ones listed, which were 14 the majority, have not adopted this, and there is 15 a reason for that . 16 The reason for that is it ' s not 17 going to help to promote growth here, it ' s not 18 going to help with home values, it ' s not going to 19 help with cost to the homeowners, it ' s not going 20 to help with cost to the home builders . 21 I just think it ' s -- There is a 22 reason why there is a heavy debate to this, and I 23 -- and I know not just from a debate amongst 24 residents, but a debate amongst cities . DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 54 1 I mean, I call on cities, I talk to 2 public works departments . I know there is a big 3 debate on what that costs and what those mandates 4 are going to do to them, so it ' s something to 5 consider when we discuss this further . I 6 appreciate the time . 7 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Any other comments 8 during the public hearing from the Council? 9 MS . NOBLE : Staff has -- would like to 10 make a comment, a point of clarification on this . 11 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Do you want to do it 12 now or do you want to let this gentleman speak 13 first? 14 MS . NOBLE : That ' s fine . 15 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Okay, go ahead, and 16 then, Krysti, we ' re going to move on . 17 MR. WEHRLI : I would just like to 18 address what Rose said. She compared the chief ' s 19 house at 6500 . I thought I heard that that was a 20 2100 square foot ranch. If you do a two-story, 21 3500 square foot two-story, common sense is it ' s 22 going to be close to double that . 23 But the actual prices are 12 to 24 15, 000 on a good sized home, and this may not be DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 55 1 the time to bring this back up again, but you were 2 saying there was relief from permits . There are 3 none . 4 We came in here and there were 5 $20, 000 . In Council right here you voted to take 6 off the road impact fee of 2, 000 . That brought it 7 down to 18, 000, which was not near enough what 8 other communities are doing. 9 Then, then when it came time to sign 10 the papers, they put it back in that I have to put 11 that road back in anyway, so I got no relief on 12 that . That ' s for another subject . 13 But we have gotten no relief, and 14 I 'm doing about ten houses right now, not one in 15 Yorkville . Kendall County, I am building in the 16 county, I 'm building in Naperville . 17 For $25, 000, people are not going to 18 come to Yorkville when they have other choices . 19 It ' s a great community and that ' s why we bought in 20 here, but you ' re killing yourselves . 21 And if you think these permits 22 aren ' t hurting, and now you throw this on top, the 23 rooftops aren ' t coming, and I would be glad to 24 sell our subdivision we took over to you . You DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 56 1 people -- Not you people . It ' s very hard to work 2 with some of these figures you ' re throwing out 3 here . They' re just not realistic . Thank you . 4 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Thank you. 5 MR. McCUE : I just want to answer Rose ' s 6 question . 7 MAYOR GOLINSKI : No, we ' re going to move 8 on, Bill . 9 MR. McCUE : Okay. 10 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Krysti, why don ' t you 11 finish up and then -- 12 MS . NOBLE : Okay. 13 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Because we have a long 14 agenda here and I think we 've pretty much had 15 everything, right? 16 MS . NOBLE : Sure . Just a clarification 17 on Staff ' s recommendation . The water sizing is 18 not based upon the fire suppression system, it ' s 19 based upon the Illinois State Plumbing Code, which 20 we have in force, and the one and a half inch pipe 21 has been implemented in a lot of communities 22 because -- it ' s to accommodate the 34 fixture 23 units that would trigger a one and a half, you 24 know, service line, so that has no relation to DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 57 1 fire suppression system. That ' s one thing. 2 Another thing, that NEC -- Staff is 3 recommending the 2008 . You can take out the arc 4 fault requirement . The reason why Staff is going 5 with the 2008 is because it ' s compatible with the 6 2009 International codes . 7 There was a recommendation for the 8 2005, sight unseen, Staff had reviewed it in 9 comparison with the 2009 standard. They' re not 10 going to have the building code updated, that ' s 11 why we ' re going with the 2008 . 12 With the requirement for fire 13 suppression system, it does not have to be enacted 14 now. You can -- you can approve it and set out a 15 date . If you look, most of our communities that 16 are being built, our subdivisions, have fee and 17 building code locks . Blackberry Woods, they have 18 a building code lock, they still build to the 2000 19 standard until 2018 . Autumn Creek has a building 20 code lock to 2015 . Bristol Bay, 2018 . 21 A lot of these builders who build 22 and have subdivisions do have fee locks, so it 23 really wouldn ' t affect, if this code was adopted, 24 any of those major builders that are still DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 58 1 building, the same as Pulte, right now. It would 2 not affect them now because they have code locks . 3 This is something as the community 4 development director is charged with over the 5 building department with life safety issues, far 6 beyond the construction of a home, once a builder 7 is gone, but for our residents who continue to 8 stay here, and these are why the recommendations 9 were made . 10 ALDERMAN GILSON: Gary, just one 11 question and maybe a clarification from Krysti . 12 The majority of communities around here -- and I ' d 13 venture to say across the country because I 'm in 14 the industry -- are not mandating that homes 15 require inch and a quarter, inch and a half lines, 16 they' re just not doing it, and I can tell you that 17 because I -- I call on them. I know that, so, you 18 know, we can talk about whether it ' s relational to 19 fire sprinklers or not, but they' re just not, 20 they' re not accepting it because it doesn ' t -- 21 it ' s way overkill and it ' s burdensome, and that ' s 22 just something to think about . 23 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Where does this go 24 next, Bart? Do we have to send this back to DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 59 1 committee for discussion or -- I guess I could ask 2 Council, where do we want this to go next? 3 It seems like there is still a lot 4 of discussion that needs to go on with this, and 5 it ' s probably best done on a committee level . 6 MR. OLSON: The EDC has already reviewed 7 the individual Staff recommendations and that ' s 8 how it got to public hearing. Did we have a 9 recommendation as to the actual approval process 10 from here? 11 MS . NOBLE : Yes . Staff ' s recommendation 12 from the Building Code Update Committee, we have 13 our recommendations, EDC ' s, City Council has the 14 opportunity after the public hearing to vote on 15 it . 16 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Well -- 17 MR. OLSON: So the choice is yours . 18 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Okay then . Let ' s bring 19 it back here in two weeks and then we ' ll be 20 prepared to discuss it and -- 21 ALDERMAN COLOSIMO : May I ask a 22 question? When we vote on this, are we voting on 23 each individual code separately? We ' re not just 24 saying here is the updates, yea or nay, right? DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 60 1 I mean, we ' re going to go through 2 the conservation code, we ' re going to go into the 3 electrical code? 4 MS . NOBLE : Correct . 5 ALDERMAN COLOSIMO : And then the other 6 issue I had was there are several of the 7 communities that have not adopted -- a lot of the 8 communities that have not even adopted the energy 9 code, which is obviously required by the State of 10 Illinois, which -- don ' t get me started on 11 requirements by the State of Illinois . 12 So the concern I have -- the 13 question I have was what if we don ' t adopt the 14 energy codes? I mean, if they' re required, why 15 don ' t they just pass a state law that says this is 16 the law and -- 17 MS . NOBLE : They have . 18 ALDERMAN COLOSIMO : So why do we have to 19 adopt them? 20 MS . NOBLE : Because we have to have them 21 in our code books as adopting it as our policy. 22 ALDERMAN COLOSIMO: So my question is 23 what happens if we don ' t adopt it? Won ' t pay our 24 bills? DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 61 1 MS . NOBLE : I mean, when it comes to our 2 plan reviewer, our plan reviewer would look at our 3 codes, and if it ' s not in our code, it would be 4 hard for them, if a developer challenges it, to 5 enforce, even though they can go back to the 6 state, lean back on the state code . It is easier 7 enforcement-wise if we adopt it and have it in our 8 code . 9 ALDERMAN COLOSIMO : Well, just to make 10 my position clear on the sprinkler issue, I don ' t 11 think we need to put the additional burden on the 12 homeowner . 13 I won ' t vote for a code that has a 14 requirement for a sprinkler for a residential 15 property. I haven ' t heard any compelling reason 16 why I should change my vote . 17 So if the code comes back to us 18 written in any way, shape or form that residential 19 sprinklers are required, even at a future date, I 20 would vote against it, so that ' s just where I 21 stand so everybody knows . 22 The very fact that we have some of 23 these subdivisions locked in on the old code ' til 24 2018, just tells me that the old code is fine . I DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 62 1 mean, the houses aren ' t falling apart, the houses 2 aren ' t blowing up, the houses aren ' t burning down . 3 Sometimes I think we do change for 4 change sake, and I 'm glad that this was reviewed, 5 because it needs to be reviewed, but I don ' t think 6 that sometimes we just need to change for change 7 sake . 8 So I ' ll look at the final drafts 9 from whatever you guys come up with and vote 10 accordingly, but I would like to vote on each one 11 individually obviously, and that ' s where we stand. 12 ALDERMAN GILSON: And we may want to 13 make our packet like that because if we ' re going 14 to do that and vote on each individual code, we ' re 15 also going to have to vote on each individual 16 suggestion for amendment to different components 17 of those sections and it can make for a long 18 meeting, so just a suggestion . 19 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Okay then . 20 MS . ORR: Maybe we should have a special 21 meeting to do that . 22 MAYOR GOLINSKI : We could. Okay. We ' ll 23 toss that idea around. 24 But other than that, we ' re going to DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . (630) 983-0030 Page 63 1 go out of public hearing and move forward. 2 (Which were all the 3 proceedings held in the 4 public hearing portion of 5 the meeting . ) 6 ---000--- 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 64 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS . 2 COUNTY OF LA SALLE ) 3 I, Christine M. Vitosh, a Certified 4 Shorthand Reporter, do hereby certify that I 5 reported in shorthand the proceedings had at the 6 hearing of the above-entitled cause and that the 7 foregoing Report of Proceedings, Pages 1 through 8 65, inclusive, is a true, correct, and complete 9 transcript of my shorthand notes so taken at the 10 time and place aforesaid. 11 I further certify that I am neither 12 counsel for nor related to counsel for any of the 13 parties to this suit, nor am I in any way related 14 to any of the parties to this suit, nor am I in 15 any way interested in the outcome thereof . 16 I further certify that my 17 certificate annexed hereto applies to the original 18 transcript and copies thereof, signed and 19 certified under my hand only. I assume no 20 responsibility for the accuracy of any reproduced 21 copies not made under my control or direction . 22 23 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 Page 65 1 In testimony whereof, I have 2 hereunto set my hand this 27th day of July, A. D. , 3 2011 . 4 5 6 Christine M. Vitosh, CSR 7 CSR No . 084-002883 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DepoCourt Reporting Service, Inc . ( 630) 983-0030 c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 i o J a s Legal ❑ Mayor #1 Finance ❑ EST. 1 � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑ K d,11 ty CC 2011-90 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Appointment of Building Code Official Meeting and Date: City Council—08/09/11 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Mayor Golinski Name Department Agenda Item Notes: c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 i o J a s Legal ❑ Mayor #2 Finance ❑ EST. 1 � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑ K d,11 ty CC 2011-91 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: KenCom Intergovernmental Agreement Meeting and Date: City Council— 8/9/11 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Mayor Golinski Name Department Agenda Item Notes: c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ PW#1 II Finance ■ EST. , � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ■ Consultant ❑ K a ty PW 2011-44 LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Progressive Energy Natural Gas Proposal Meeting and Date: City Council 08/09/11 Synopsis: Natural gas cost reduction proposal. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 7/12/11 Action Taken: Tabled Item Number: PW 2011-44 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. 's3s From: Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director O Date: July 26, 2011 p Subject: Progressive Energy Proposal K dA C— -LE ��•~i Please see attached for a natural gas cost reduction proposal from Progressive Energy Group. Progressive estimates that by switching natural gas suppliers from NICOR to Santanna the City could save approximately$3,876 annually in natural gas costs. Progressive recommends that 10 accounts (listed on page 5) be moved from NICOR to Santanna, for a contract term of 12 months that can be canceled at any time with 30 days notice. Over the last several years the Santanna rate has averaged $0.0348 less than NICOR's monthly variable rate, which would yield the City approximately $2,517 in annual savings. By choosing to go with a customer select supplier like Santanna, the City would be eligible to reduce the State Revenue Tax on supplied therms by$0.02 per therm, resulting in anticipated savings of$1,359. Staff is requesting that the City Council authorize the City Administrator and Finance Director to sign a one year contract with Santanna Energy Services for the ten municipal accounts listed on the second page of the attached contract. In addition, please note that the City's annual therm rebate from NICOR would be unaffected by switching to Santanna. C *Ity of Yorkv*111e Cost Reduction Initiative June 17,, 2011 PROGRESSIVE E think ohea .move ah eod' Confidential-Do Not Copy or Distribute. © 2010 Progressive Energy Group—All Rights Reserved. Our Auit PEI 4' E • • • ENERGY GROUP ENER Arkijnk ipbood—at-ove 42head • Efficiency and Conservation • Gas and Electric Bill - Auditing Audit and Procurement • Franchise Agreement & -v = Municipal Tax Auditing • Cost Containment Purchasing Audit • Lost Revenue Auditing • Home Warranty by the Protection Company Confidential-Do Not Copy or Distribute. © 2010 Progressive Energy Group—All Rights Reserved. Utility CROGRSSV E .� E to Supplier Commercial Industrial Commercial Industrial Gas Volume Electric Volume 3 With Supplier With Supplier I With Nicor Gas ' With ComEd Confidential-Do Not Copy or Distribute. © 2010 Progressive Energy Group—All Rights Reserved. Energy of E ENERGY GROUP 'Mo What We Do What We Find • Utility Management Assistance — Supplier and Utility Oversight • Rate Negotiation Charges Tariff and Rider Review — Validate accurate delivery rate being Improperly - • Accounts P"M paid to utility • Utility accounts — Meter Class review and cost - Wrong Rates and Riders reduction implementation — Tax review — Bill Negotiation and Dispute Resolution - Incorrect Bill Charges • High Bill Review and Audit Services Improper . • of — Estimated to Actual Catch Up Read Payments- Misapplied — No Read Estimated Bills Intervention & Complaint Escalation Process/Policy — Credit Department Intervention • Late Pay Fee Negotiation Dispute — Apply Utility Expertise - Misdirected Billings — Invoke commission guidelines - Credit Disqualifications • Deposit Requirement Reduction - Liberal Credit Interpretation Confidential-Do Not Copy or Distribute. © 2010 Progressive Energy Group—All Rights Reserved. Natural Gas Audit Analysis J�'V E N E K GY GROUP rl:mk dPrend'__ atove aatrcm a ` Targeted Current Supply Targeted Supply Annual Supply Annual MtrCon./Rate Mtr.Con/Rate Meter Tariff Sales Revenue Name Service Address City Suppplier Rate Rate Savings Therms Audit Audit Savings Rate Audit Tax Savings Comments Commerical Accounts City of Yorkville 804Game Farm Rd Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Index plus$0.03 $249.00 4,150 $621.60 $77.10 $83.00 Possible meter tariff reduction City of Yorkville 1955 S Bridge St Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Index plus$0.03 $90.00 800 $25.30 $16.00 City of Yorkville 201 W Hydraulic St Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Index plus$0.03 $270.00 4,500 $25.30 $90.00 Rec Center 202 E Countryside Pkwy Ste E Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Index plus$0.03 $1,260.00 21,000 $77.10 $420.00 City of Yorkville 1 Van EmmonRd Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Index plus$0.03 $30.00 1,500 $25.30 $30.00 City of Yorkville Pbl Works 610 TowerLn Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Index plus$0.03 $56.00 8,500 $25.30 $170.00 City of Yorkville 610 Tower Ln Unit B Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Index plus$0.03 $56.00 2,200 $303.60 $25.30 $44.00 Meter consolidation with Account 83-80-00-1000 City of Yorkville Pbl Works 131 E Hydralic St Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Index plus$0.03 $36.00 1,800 $25.30 $36.00 Yorkville Public Library 902 Game Farm Rd Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Index plus$0.03 $360.00 18,000 $77.10 $360.00 City of Yorkville 1 Rte 47 Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Index plus$0.03 $110.00 5,500 $25.30 $110.00 Total Projected Savings $2,517.00 67,950 $303.60 $621.60 $1,359.00 Accounts to Stay with Nicor City of Yorkville 1991 Cannonball Trl Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Stay with Nicor $25.30 City of Yorkville 100 Raintree Rd Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Stay with Nicor $77.10 Possible meter tariff reduction City of Yorkville Lift Station 420 Fairhaven Dr Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Stay with Nicor $621.60 $77.10 Lift Station possible metertaifff reduction City of Yorkville Bruel I Pump Station 101BruellSt Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Stay with Nicor $621.60 $77.10 Pump Station possible metertariff reduction City of Yorkville 1107 PrairieLn Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Stay with Nicor $25.30 City of Yorkville 1301 CarolynCt Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Stay with Nicor $25.30 City of Yorkville 202 E Countryside Pkwy Ste D Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Stay with Nicor $303.60 $25.30 Meter consolidation with Account 6499-70-7276 City of Yorkville 1975 Bridge St Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Stay with Nicor $25.30 City of Yorkville 276 Windham Cir Yorkville Nicor Monthly Variable Stay with Nicor $25.30 Total Projected Savings $0.00 0 $303.60 $1,243.20 Confidential-Do Not Copy or Distribute. © 2010 Progressive Energy Group-All Rights Reserved. 5 Historical Natural Gas Pricing -al PROGRESSIVE ENERGY GROUP ink aboad_ at-ove ache ad AM NGI Nicor Santanna NGI Nicor Santanna Monthly Index plus Monthly Index plus 2009 Index Rate $0.03 Differntial 2010 Index Rate $0.03 Differential Jauaury $0.618 $0.690 $0.648 $0.042 Jauaury $0.622 $0.650 $0.652 -$0.002 February $0.587 $0.660 $0.617 $0.043 February $0.492 $0.570 $0.522 $0.048 March $0.501 $0.620 $0.531 $0.089 March $0.403 1 $0.430 $0.433 -$0.003 April $0.400 $0.490 $0.430 $0.060 April $0.352 $0.430 $0.382 $0.048 May $0.429 $0.410 $0.459 -$0.049 May $0.313 $0.450 $0.343 $0.107 June $0.413 $0.440 $0.443 -$0.003 June $0.340 $0.450 $0.370 $0.080 July $0.473 $0.510 $0.503 $0.007 July $0.357 $0.460 $0.387 $0.073 August $0.463 $0.500 $0.493 $0.007 August $0.349 $0.400 $0.379 $0.021 September $0.377 $0.410 $0.407 $0.003 September $0.279 1 $0.330 $0.309 $0.021 October 0.392 $0.440 $0.422 $0.018 October $0.387 $0.390 $0.417 -$0.027 Novmeber 0.345 $0.430 $0.375 $0.055 Novmeber $0.481 $0.470 $0.511 -$0.041 December 0.4510 $0.460 $0.481 -$0.021 December $0.475 1 $0.500 $0.505 -$0.005 6 Confidential-Do Not Copy or Distribute. © 2010 Progressive Energy Group-All Rights Reserved. Summary • Key Findings PEI 4' E E ERGY GROUP r!ink aboad__.rrrove ctrea • Gas Supply — Santanna Index plus $0.03 program historically averages $0.025 less than Nicor's Monthly variable rate • In 2010, Santanna's Index plus $0.03 was lower than Nicor's variable rate 9 out of 12 months • In 2009, Santanna's Index plus $0.03 was lower than Nicor's Variable rate 7 out of 12 months — We recommend transitioning 10 accounts over to Santanna Energy Services • 12 month contract • Can cancel with 30 days notice — Capture estimated $2,517.00 annual savings — By transitioning accounts over to a Customer Select provide, the City of Yorkville will also be eligible to reduce the State Revenue Tax on the supplied therms by $0.02 per therm. By going with a supplier, the natural gas purchased will no longer be in the State of Illinois as currently being provided by Nicor Gas. Tax will still be assessed on the therms delivered to the facility • Gas Distribution, Rates & Riders — Consolidate Meter for accounts 65-69-00-0377 and 83-80-00-1000 • Annual savings projected to be $607.20 • Typical meter consolidation charge will be $100-$400 depending meter distance • Progressive Energy Group has local contractor to process consolidation request — 4 possible meter tariff reduction (accounts 66-70-44-6942, 20-52-56-2042, 23-45-91-4862, and 15-41-50-1000) • Annual usage should not be on meter class B designation from Nicor — Class A monthly charge $25.30 vs Class B Monthly charge $77.10 • We estimate that Nicor Charges $220.00 per meter to downsize to correct meter size • Capture $1,864.80 savings 7 Confidential-Do Not Copy or Distribute. © 2010 Progressive Energy Group—All Rights Reserved. Projected Cost Deferral/Reductionm�.�, � '� • rkunk aa Electric — Capacity Cost Deferral Supply N/A Natural Gas — Meter $607.20 Consolidation $1,359.00 Sales ' - • • Change— Meter Class $1,864.80 Supply Reduction $2,517.00 Savings Total Projected Gas $6,348.00 Preliminary reductions based on information provided in Qtr 2 of 2011, upon contract execution Progressive will nd report findings. Confidential-Do Not Copy or Distribute. D 2010 Progressive Energy Group—All Rights Reserved.Progressive energy Group's fee will not exceed $0.01 per therm for natural gas and will be paid by the supplier if c111 ntract is executed • Paying too much? Santanna There i choice! ! e e s a c o ce. . ENERGY SERVICES Natural Gas Agreement Terms and Conditions ➢ Gas Price: 0 Market based monthly index(NGI)+3 cents per therm for the initial term of the contract. Market based monthly index is defined by Natural Gas Intelligence (NGI),Bidweek Issue, Chicago Citygate"Avg." The monthly index(NGI) price fluctuates each month. ➢ Term: Initial term of 12 months starting with the date of first delivery by SES for your account -with automatic renewal for successive month to month terms thereafter. ➢ Admin.Fee: $3.99 per month. ➢ Rescission Terms: You may cancel your enrollment without penalty within 20 days from your contract date. To do this you would contact SES at 1- 800-764-4427. After the 20 days,SES will submit your account for enrollment and you will receive a confirmation notice from your utility. You will then have another 10 business days from the date of this confirmation to reconsider your decision without penalty. To withdraw your enrollment you may contact either Santanna at 1-800-764-4427 or your utility's customer service.(Nicor Gas 1-888-642-6748,Peoples Gas 1-866- 556-6001,North Shore gas 1-866-556-6004) ➢ Cancellation: You are free to cancel at any time,with 30 days notice. SES will process your cancellation request within 30 days of receipt. It may take your utility additional time to complete the cancellation process,as required under program rules to finalize your account. You are responsible for all charges through the date cancellation is finalized by your utility. ➢ Cancellation Fee: None ➢ Payment Terms/Late Fees: Payments will first be applied to outstanding fees and interest,then to outstanding principal. Late fees are assessed at 1.5%per month. ➢ Collection: You will be responsible for any costs or legal fees incurred by SES related to the enforcement of this agreement. ➢ Utility Charges: All Gas Utility related distribution charges and taxes are your responsibility. ➢ Program Cost: Your Gas Utility will charge SES for retail program-related charges relative to your account and usage. These charges over the last 12 months averaged about a 1/2 cent per therm of usage. SES will pass all monthly program-related charges to you. ➢ Quantity: You will be charged for the amount of gas you use, according to your metered consumption as reported by your Gas Utility, plus unaccounted-for gas/fuel(F&S)charges. This is a requirements contract. ➢ Agency: You appoint SES as your agent for the purposes of securing your natural gas supply and grant SES authorization to access your Gas Utility account information,transcripts,and payment history. You also appoint SES as your agent for the purpose of enrolling,servicing and billing you for any products or services other than natural gas offered by or through SES, if you choose such products or services in the future, and you authorize SES to bill you for such products or services on your monthly Gas Utility bill. This agreement shall be binding upon and benefit the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. SES reserves the right to assign this agreement upon written notification. ➢ Force Majeure: SES will make commercially reasonable efforts to supply natural gas service,but does not guarantee a continuous supply of natural gas. Certain causes and events out of control of SES(called Force Majeure Events)may result in interruptions in service and effect the price until the results of the causes and events are corrected. SES will not be liable for the results of any such interruptions or price changes caused by Force Majeure Events,including but not limited to acts of God,catastrophic weather events,acts of any governmental authority,accidents,strikes,labor disputes,changes in laws,rules or regulation by any governmental authority,or any cause beyond SES's control. Yes, Please enroll me in the Santanna Program! Name(First Name/Last Name) Business/Company Name:_City of Yorkville Bill/Mailing Address: City: Yorkville State IL Zip_60560 Email: Phone:O - Fax:O - Federal Tax ID/SSN: -- -- Account#: I See Attached Lx Business ❑ Residential Meter#: I See Attached I FX Nicor Gas ❑Peoples Gas ❑North Shore Gas 0 Competitive Market Program at a monthly index rate of(NGI)+3 cents per therm,for the initial term. By entering into this agreement,you appoint SES as your agent for the purposes of securing your natural gas supply,and grant SES authorization to access your Gas Utility account information,transcripts,and payment history. I understand that I may be subject to cancellation or switching fees from my utility company and/or current supplier. I have read and agree to the terms and conditions of this Natural Gas Agreement and acknowledge receipt of a copy of this agreement. By signing this agreement,Fmy company agree(s)to buy my/my company's natural gas commodity requirements from Santanna Energy Services("SES"). I acknowledge that the independent authorized representative identified himself/herself clearly as representing SES. This Agreement is with a certified alternative gas supplier,NOT the local Gas Utility. You will be supplied with natural gas whether or not you sign this Agreement. Authorized Signature: Date: Account Holder Authorized Decision Maker Agent ID: Agent Name: Agent Signature: Office Verified L Santanna Energy Services - Customer Service— 1-800-764-4427 (280) Name Service Address City Suppplier Commerical Accounts City of Yorkville 804 Game Farm Rd Yorkville Nicor City of Yorkville 1955 S Bridge St Yorkville Nicor City of Yorkville 201 W Hydraulic St Yorkville Nicor Rec Center 202 E Countryside Pkwy Ste E Yorkville Nicor City of Yorkville 1 Van Emmon Rd Yorkville Nicor City of Yorkville Pbl Works 610 Tower Ln Yorkville Nicor City of Yorkville 610 Tower Ln Unit B Yorkville Nicor City of Yorkville Pbl Works 131 E Hydralic St Yorkville Nicor Yorkville Public Library 902 Game Farm Rd Yorkville Nicor City of Yorkville 1 Rte 47 Yorkville Nicor C/T y Reviewed By: A 0 Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number Finance El PS #1 EST. 1Z 1836 Engineer ❑ City Administrator CiVI ` Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number °°°lfg �0 Community Development ❑ C °°"ry Police PS 2011-13 LE ��'� Public Works City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Ordinance Regulating On-Street Parking on E. Millbrook Circle— Second Reading Meeting and Date: Public Safety—August 4, 2011 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 7/26/11 Action Taken: First Reading Item Number: PS 2011-13 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Co.y A o Memorandum J T To: Public Safety Committee EST. �Z 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator .4 _�` CC: 0 �� o,gaa, �p Date: July 29, 2011 Subject: E Millbrook Circle parking restrictions This item was last discussed at the July 26th City Council meeting, where the item was tabled to this meeting. At the City Council meeting, it was stated that the residents of the Colonies neighborhood were originally concerned about parking within the cul-de-sacs off of E Millbrook Circle, and not concerned about parking on E Millbrook Circle. The reason stated for the tabling was that this ordinance would have no impact on the resident's concerns. While true, the ordinance is still recommended by staff for approval because of the right-of-way width, future buildout and traffic patterns of the area. At full buildout, parking on both sides of the road will prevent safe and smooth traffic flow in both directions. Therefore, we are recommending the restriction still be approved by City Council. The residents' concern about parking in the cul-de-sacs must be handled by their HOA, as the cul-de-sacs are private streets. Co.y o Memorandum '"' To: City Council EST. �Z 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator .4 ` CC: O C u " p Date: May 26, 2011 Count�Y Seat Subject: Parking restrictions on E Millbrook Circle Alderwoman Teeling asked for this item to be placed on the agenda. Several residents in the Colonies section of Grande Reserve have contacted her to request parking restrictions on various streets in that area, because of the narrow road width. Most of the roads in this section are private roads (map attached). For the private roads, the residents would have to convince the HOA board to place no parking signs along the private roadways and then sign an agreement with the City allowing us to enforce the signs. For the roads which are private (East Millbrook Circle, Preston), the City could place no parking signs along one side of the street to improve traffic flow through the subdivision. If this is desired, the City Engineer has recommended the west side of East Millbrook Circle should be restricted because there are more intersections with cul-de-sacs on this side; doing so would improve intersection sight distance. n , Yr` �•/rte. jy in-- 1 . . I '•, �,.r P�`al (r>—."'1�r.1�I Ind � ri Iry`_.rr�..i if llJ I.'-� • 11•�•{ . F. jr ��:. all �� \1111111111♦ IF�I-3��'� �.• , -M Fli So M"M ii ii i; �� ♦ III■ = 1111 � ��''r��Q1�� iii■ ■ �' ��1111/S �� iii■ �:.- am WRAP � PIP 1 4, A ♦��♦ -�j I�r�`� � � i� I ♦♦111 ►�,� N� � LEGENDe PROPOSED 60 FT R.O.W. LOCATION : • • • • • IDATE • • • • ISCALE r r ti , . • • CHECKED BY DAT ON v + \fir:- ,> �. ' - Vol LEI pr Ll �� . • �:• !ate fr� ina i�°�' �.�i��r.:� y Imo...., •. Lima:rr �!;�!• ��\�\ H r - �� ' • - moo oil WE WE - - - �•�� //„ X1111111111 * '' %r' .�„ `i'", iii-��''■ � �� X11111-�� !�; ,�i■ � 11 11 � .I■ �_ ME Ill 1 amm ME sm *701 LIM4. R.O.W. • • EXHIBIT • COWHEY pROjECT No. 2807.00 OUDMUNDSON 6/17/03 300 BOULEVARD 111 I I I K 60143 DRAWN BY 1 • CONSULTING INGMEERS 1 . I � � CHECKED DAT . .�.°'=`�'• �.a4r�":y�y w�a':+�'° �y.�..�e:r�yti:4�yw!ti�' ,+y�M°��"ti�yw��M4�y+� � _� I - Ara 4 A•S r�. .+h .,.e-_ ,r.ry � Ara � Aro !a A•b Ara dk .�a• Ara 4 Are Ara 4 Ara Aray` Ara Ara Ara Ara r` Ara A•� Ah yr .�A_� Ay .� �A 14�p'y 'yd�'yr�ay-�`y��Ay .��." • pty�`_�'.r�A a�.�i ati �.�.� ' '�`+:� '�,,.d}• rhp wd,ti •,.•ti rh +n mdW r"d r-`d py � .�.�.•..may' y '�\! �:' �.'! �Y.�}•-�.:. !.��y '��4�.• : y`y ±ti�ytw �l�d�lhn •4d�r+i�;rtiA�rti:y..ryipi r�� .'.��di '.��• •�� ti�4 y t� ....Jl .. w_ N � .. .. ..r a..tee_ _ r/ 1 ,Pao el F The 0 Data is provided United City of Yorkville GIS accuracy,timeliness,or .. completeness. - Parcel Data and Aerial Photography "Requester"to determine accuracy,timeliness,completeness,and W Provided . Kendall County GIS appropriateness of its use. The United City of Yorkville makes no implied,warranties,expressed or to the use of the Data. Ordinance No. 2011- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS REGULATING ON-STREET PARKING NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Title 6, Chapter 2, Section 2, of the United City of Yorkville Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by adding the following: 6-2-2: PARKING PROHIBITED ON DESIGNATED STREETS: E. MILL BROOK CIRCLE A "no parking"zone shall be created on the west side of East Mill Brook Circle between Blackhawk Boulevard and Preston Drive. Section 2. If any Section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Chapter is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2011. CITY CLERK CHRIS FUNKHOUSER DIANE TEELING LARRY KOT JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS ROSE ANN SPEARS GEORGE GILSON, JR. Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2011. MAYOR Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0-0 Legal ❑ PS #2 Finance ❑ EST. , �'� 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ■ Chief of Police ■ K PS 2011-21 LEKendall ..y Cnty 2 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Request for Liquor Code Amendments Meeting and Date: City Council—08/09/11 Synopsis: Request to amend city liquor code to increase the number of Class A and Class G liquor licenses available and to also amend the catering license class. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PS 8/4/11 Action Taken: Consensus to move forward to CC consent agenda for approval. Item Number: PS 2011-21 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Lisa Pickering Clerk's Office Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Please see attached information. D Cll o Memorandum s EST. - leas To: Public Safety Committee =�- From: Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk 0 00 CC: Mayor Gary J. Golinski ' dAC°°Ty �? Rich Hart, Chief of Police <tE '��'� Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: July 28, 2011 Subject: Request for Liquor Code Amendments– Rt. 47 &Van Emmon St. (Cobblestone) We have received an application for both a Class "A-1"–Retail Tavern/Bar and also a Class "G"–Beer Garden/Patio license for a new business that will be opening at the corner of Rt. 47 & Van Emmon. Per city code, there is a limit on the number of Class "A" and Class "G" liquor licenses that are available. Both of these liquor categories are full. Before any new Class "A" or Class "G" licenses can be issued, City Council will need to decide if the city liquor code should be amended to increase the number of liquor licenses available. If the decision is made to amend the code, it does not guarantee that a liquor license will be issued to this applicant. As with all liquor applicants, the Liquor Commissioner will review the application and make the final decision. There are currently four locations licensed for Class "A" Liquor Licenses. OJ's Tap and Kendall Pub are both located in the downtown area. Stonefire Restaurant and Fox River Lanes are located outside of the downtown area. Should the City Council decide to approve an ordinance amending the liquor code, it will bring the total of Class "A" licenses up to five. Regarding the Glass "G"–Beer Garden/Patio licenses, the city code allows for a total of seven licenses. City Council approval of an increase in this classification will bring the total of beer garden/patio licenses up to eight. Along with the request for the amendments to the Class A and Class G categories, this applicant is also looking at holding a Catering Class liquor license to provide liquor for another business located in the downtown area. To provide for this use, an amendment to the Catering License definition would need to be considered. For your consideration attached are red-lined and clean versions of the sections of the liquor code which would be affected by this request. 3-3-6: NUMBER OF LICENSES: A. No limitation shall be in effect within the city as to the maximum number of liquor license holders, except with reference to: 1.Number Of Licenses For Classes Al Through A4: Holders of classes Al through A4 which shall not exceed the number of threetwe(32) licenses issued at any given time in an area commencing at the intersection of the center line of Route 47, also known as Bridge Street, and the center line of Van Emmon Street, and running thence west along the center line of Van Emmon Street to the alley; thence in a northerly direction parallel to the center line of said Route 47 to the south bank of the Fox River; thence easterly along the south bank of the Fox River to a point which intersects with the center line of Heustis Street extended; thence along said east line extended in a southerly direction and along the center line of said Heustis Street until said line intersects the center line of Van Emmon Street; thence west along the center line of Van Emmon Street to the intersection of the center line of Route 47; thence westerly along the center line of Van Emmon Street to a point 100 feet westerly of the easterly line of Route 47; thence southerly parallel with Route 47 (the same being Bridge Street) to the point of intersection of the center line of Washington Street; thence easterly along the center line of Washington Street to a point 100 feet easterly of the easterly line of Route 47, the same being Bridge Street thence northerly parallel with the easterly line of Route 47 to its intersection with the center line of Van Emmon Street; thence westerly along the center line of Van Emmon Street to the place of beginning. In any event, it shall be unlawful to sell or offer for sale at retail any alcoholic liquor within any residential portion of the city. (Ord. 2008-59, 7-8-2008) 2. Additional Retail Type Licenses Issued: The liquor control commissioner shall further have a right to issue up to a total of two (2) additional retail type licenses inclusive of any of the four(4) existing retail class licenses, in areas outside the above designated downtown area and outside of any residential area subject to approval of the city council, in order to provide for the orderly growth of the city with respect to additional territories being developed and annexed within the city. No licenses in excess of two (2) additional class Al through A4 licenses, inclusive, shall be issued outside of the downtown area without amendment of this section by the city council. (Ord. 2009-29, 6-9-2009) 3-3-4-5: OUTDOOR LIQUOR LICENSE: B. Maximum Number Of Outdoor Liquor Licenses: There shall be no more than eihtseven (87) outdoor liquor licenses at any one time, without prior approval of Yorkville city council. The issuance of said number of outdoor licenses shall be without taking into account the number of special event licenses issued by the city. (Ord. 2010-01, 1-12-2010) 3-3-4: CLASSES OF LICENSES: CA- Catering. Authorizes the licensee to sell alcoholic liquor in connection with the operation of_ a catering business with its business license location within the Ceity. ^ thef zes the Beers°°to sell to the general public alcoholic liquor in its original packages only, for consumption at a private party in the City when the food for said party is prepared by the licensee (2) an existing Class A-1 licensee with its existing license location in the City's B-2 Business zoning district to sell alcoholic liquor during a live indoor entertainment event in the same zoning district, at which an admission fee is charged for that event,by service not in its original container, and with or without food service. The l '°f"'° shall only be issued to per-sons whe ea demonstrate that they are operating a bona fide catering business with headquarters within th All food and beverage sales made by the licensee shall be taxed as if made at the Licensee's location of its business or existing liquor license. made at registered v=ise of keenv° whie h shall be deemed the 3-3-6: NUMBER OF LICENSES: A. No limitation shall be in effect within the city as to the maximum number of liquor license holders, except with reference to: 1.Number Of Licenses For Classes Al Through A4: Holders of classes Al through A4 which shall not exceed the number of three (3) licenses issued at any given time in an area commencing at the intersection of the center line of Route 47, also known as Bridge Street, and the center line of Van Emmon Street, and running thence west along the center line of Van Emmon Street to the alley; thence in a northerly direction parallel to the center line of said Route 47 to the south bank of the Fox River; thence easterly along the south bank of the Fox River to a point which intersects with the center line of Heustis Street extended; thence along said east line extended in a southerly direction and along the center line of said Heustis Street until said line intersects the center line of Van Emmon Street; thence west along the center line of Van Emmon Street to the intersection of the center line of Route 47; thence westerly along the center line of Van Emmon Street to a point 100 feet westerly of the easterly line of Route 47; thence southerly parallel with Route 47 (the same being Bridge Street)to the point of intersection of the center line of Washington Street; thence easterly along the center line of Washington Street to a point 100 feet easterly of the easterly line of Route 47, the same being Bridge Street thence northerly parallel with the easterly line of Route 47 to its intersection with the center line of Van Emmon Street; thence westerly along the center line of Van Emmon Street to the place of beginning. In any event, it shall be unlawful to sell or offer for sale at retail any alcoholic liquor within any residential portion of the city. (Ord. 2008-59, 7-8-2008) 2. Additional Retail Type Licenses Issued: The liquor control commissioner shall further have a right to issue up to a total of two (2) additional retail type licenses inclusive of any of the four(4) existing retail class licenses, in areas outside the above designated downtown area and outside of any residential area subject to approval of the city council, in order to provide for the orderly growth of the city with respect to additional territories being developed and annexed within the city. No licenses in excess of two (2) additional class Al through A4 licenses, inclusive, shall be issued outside of the downtown area without amendment of this section by the city council. (Ord. 2009-29, 6-9-2009) 3-3-4-5: OUTDOOR LIQUOR LICENSE: B. Maximum Number Of Outdoor Liquor Licenses: There shall be no more than eight(8) outdoor liquor licenses at any one time, without prior approval of Yorkville city council. The issuance of said number of outdoor licenses shall be without taking into account the number of special event licenses issued by the city. (Ord. 2010-01, 1-12-2010) 3-3-4: CLASSES OF LICENSES: CA - Catering. Authorizes the licensee to sell alcoholic liquor in connection with the operation of: (1) a catering business with its business license location within the City to sell to the general public alcoholic liquor in its original packages only, for consumption at a private party in the City when the food for said party is prepared by the licensee, or (2) an existing Class A-I licensee with its existing license location in the City's B-2 Business zoning district to sell alcoholic liquor during a live indoor entertainment event in the same zoning district, at which an admission fee is charged for that event, by service not in its original container, and with or without food service. All food and beverage sales made by the licensee shall be taxed as if made at the Licensee's location of its business or existing liquor license. Ordinance No. 2011- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS PROVIDING FOR LIQUOR CONTROL WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to section 5/4-1 of the Liquor Control Act of 1934, as amended, (235 ILCS 511-1 et seq.) the corporate authorities have the power to determine the number, kind and classification of liquor licenses and their fees; and the regulations for the sale of alcoholic beverages; and in addition pursuant to its powers to protect the public's health,welfare and safety this Ordinance is hereby adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 6-A-1, of the United City of Yorkville Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by deleting paragraph 1 in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 1. Number Of Licenses For Classes Al Through A4: Holders of classes Al through A4 which shall not exceed the number of three (3) licenses issued at any given time in an area commencing at the intersection of the center line of Route 47, also known as Bridge Street, and the center line of Van Emmon Street, and running thence west along the center line of Van Emmon Street to the alley; thence in a northerly direction parallel to the center line of said Route 47 to the south bank of the Fox River; thence easterly along the south bank of the Fox River to a point which intersects with the center line of Heustis Street extended; thence along said east line extended in a southerly direction and along the center line of said Heustis Street until said line intersects the center line of Van Emmon Street; thence west along the center line of Van Emmon Street to the intersection of the center line of Route 47; thence westerly along the center line of Van Emmon Street to a point 100 feet westerly of the easterly line of Route 47; thence southerly parallel with Route 47 (the same being Bridge Street) to the point of intersection of the center line of Washington Street; thence easterly along the center line of Washington Street to a point 100 feet easterly of the easterly line of Route 47, the same being Bridge Street thence northerly parallel with the easterly line of Route 47 to its intersection with the center line of Van Emmon Street; thence westerly along the center line of Van Emmon Street to the place of beginning. In any event, it shall be unlawful to sell or offer for sale at retail any alcoholic liquor within any residential portion of the city. (Ord. 2008-59, 7-8-2008) Section 2. That Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 4-5, of the United City of Yorkville Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by deleting paragraph B in its entirety and replacing it with the following: B. Maximum Number Of Outdoor Liquor Licenses: There shall be no more than eight(8) outdoor liquor licenses at any one time, without prior approval of Yorkville city council. The issuance of said number of outdoor licenses shall be without taking into account the number of special event licenses issued by the city. (Ord. 2010-01, 1-12-2010) Section 3. That Title 3, Chapter 3, Section 3-3-4A4, "CA Catering", of the United City of Yorkville Code of Ordinances is hereby amended by deleting the paragraph titled"CA—Catering" in its entirety and replacing it with the following: "CA — Catering. Authorizes the licensee to sell alcoholic liquor in connection with the operation of: (1) a catering business with its business license location within the City to sell to the general public alcoholic liquor in its original packages only, for consumption at a private party in the City when the food for said party is prepared by the licensee, or (2) an existing Class A-1 licensee with its existing license location in the City's B-2 Business zoning district to sell alcoholic liquor during a live indoor entertainment event in the same zoning district, at which an admission fee is charged for that event, by service not in its original container, and with or without food service. All food and beverage sales made by the licensee shall be taxed as if made at the Licensee's location of its business or existing liquor license." Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2011. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois,this day of , A.D. 2011. MAYOR `,SAD C►p Reviewed By: d� Legal City Council Finance M EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ City Administrator ■ Agenda Item Tracking Number Human Resources ❑ "$ �© Community Development ❑❑ Police ALE �► � Public Works ❑ City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Authorizing ordinance for refunding bonds (Refinancing prior debt obligations) City Council/Committee Agenda Date: City Council—August 9, 2011 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 2011- AN ORDINANCE authorizing the issuance of one or more Series of General Obligation Refunding Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source) Series 2011 of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the "City") is a duly organized and existing municipality incorporated and existing under the provisions of the laws of the State of Illinois, and is now operating under the provisions of the Illinois Municipal Code, as amended(the "Code"); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City (the "Corporate Authorities") has determined that it is advisable, necessary and in the best interests of the City to pay the costs to refund (i) all or a portion of the City's General Obligation Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2005D and (ii) all or a portion of the City's General Obligation Refunding Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2008 (the "Refunding"), in order to restructure the debt burden of the City; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost of the Refunding and paying costs in connection therewith is not greater than $12,000,000, and there are insufficient funds on hand and lawfully available to provide the funds for such Project; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and for the best interest of the City that the Refunding be undertaken and in order to finance the costs thereof it will be necessary for the City to issue up to $12,000,000 alternate bonds (the "Alternate Bonds"), being general obligation refunding bonds payable from distributions of sales taxes imposed by the City and collected by the State of CH 12_2626120.2 Illinois pursuant to Sections 8-11-1.3 and 8-11-1.4 of the Illinois Municipal Code consisting of the Non-Home Rule Municipal Retailers Occupation Tax and Non-Home Rule Municipal Service Occupation Tax; as authorized to be issued at this time pursuant to the Local Government Debt Reform Act of the State of Illinois, as amended(the "Act"); and WHEREAS, if the above-mentioned revenue sources are insufficient to pay the Bonds, ad valorem property taxes upon all taxable property in the City without limitation as to rate or amount are authorized to be extended to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds; WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the City is authorized to issue its Alternate Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $12,000,000 for the purpose of providing funds to accomplish the Refunding and to pay the costs of issuing such Alternate Bonds: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS, as follows: Section 1. Incorporation of Preambles. The Corporate Authorities hereby fmd that all of the recitals contained in the preambles to this ordinance are full, true and correct and do incorporate them and the terms defined therein into this ordinance by this reference. Section 2. Determination To Issue Bonds. It is necessary and in the best interests of the City to undertake the Refunding and that for the purpose of paying the costs of issuance in connection therewith, there are hereby authorized to be issued and sold the Alternate Bonds of the City in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000. It is hereby expressed to be the desire of the City to issue Alternate Bonds in an amount not to exceed $12,000,000. Section 3. Publication. This ordinance, together with a notice in the statutory form as attached hereto, and appropriately completed (the "Notice"), shall be published once within 2 CH 12_2626120.2 ten(10) days after passage hereof by the Corporate Authorities in the Kendall County Record the same being a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and if no petition, signed by electors numbering seven and one half percent (7-1/2%) of the registered voters in the City(i.e., 790) and asking that the issuance of the Alternate Bonds be submitted to referendum is filed with the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the date of the publication of this ordinance and said notice, then the Alternate Bonds shall be authorized to be issued. If such petition is filed with the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the date of publication of the Notice, an election on the proposition to issue said bonds shall be held on the 20th day of March, 2011. Section 4. Additional Ordinances. If no petition meeting the requirements of applicable law is filed during the petition period hereinabove referred to, then the Corporate Authorities intend to adopt additional ordinances or proceedings supplementing or amending this ordinance providing for the issuance and sale of the Alternate Bonds, prescribing all the details of the Alternate Bonds, so long as the maximum amount of the Alternate Bonds as set forth in this ordinance is not exceeded and there is no material change in the Refunding or other purposes described herein. Such additional ordinances or proceedings shall in all instances become effective in accordance with applicable law. This ordinance, together with such additional ordinances or proceedings, shall constitute complete authority for the issuance of the Alternate Bonds under applicable law. Section 5. Bond Counsel. The Corporate Authorities hereby appoint Foley & Lardner LLP as its bond counsel for the Alternate Bonds. Section 6. Severability. If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this ordinance shall be held invalid, the invalidity of such section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the other provisions of this ordinance. 3 CH 12_2626120.2 Section 7. Repealer. All ordinances, resolutions or orders, or parts thereof, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are to the extent of such conflict hereby repealed. Section 8. Effectiveness. This ordinance is effective upon its passage and approval. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS this August 9, 2011. GEORGE GILSON, JR. MARTY MUNNS CARLO COLOSIMO CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT DIANE TEELING JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ROSE ANN SPEARS APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, the day of August, 2011. APPROVED Mayor, United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois Gary J. Golinski ATTEST: City Clerk Published in Kendall County Record on , 2011. 4 CH 12_2626120.2 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ISSUE BONDS AND RIGHT TO FILE PETITIONS Notice is hereby given that pursuant to Ordinance No. , adopted on the 9th day of August, 2011 (the "Ordinance"), the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the "City"), intends to issue its General Obligation Refunding Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000 (the "Bonds"), and bearing interest per annum at not to exceed the maximum rate authorized by law at the time the Bonds are sold, for the purpose of paying the costs to refund all or a portion of(i) the City's General Obligation Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source), Series 2005D and (ii) the City's General Obligation Refunding Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source) Series 2008 (the "Refunding"), as more fully described in the Ordinance. The revenue sources that will be pledged to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be distributions of sales taxes imposed by the City and collected by the State of Illinois pursuant to Sections 8-11-1.3 and 8-11-1.4 of the Illinois Municipal Code consisting of the Non-Home Rule Municipal Retailers Occupation Tax and Non-Home Rule Municipal Service Occupation Tax. If these revenue sources are insufficient to pay the Bonds, ad valorem property taxes upon all taxable property in the City without limitation as to rate or amount are authorized to be extended to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds. A complete copy of the Ordinance follows this notice. Notice is hereby further given that if a petition, signed by 790 or more electors of the City (the same being equal to 7.5% of the registered voters of the City), asking that the issuance of the Bonds be submitted to referendum is filed with the City Clerk of the City within thirty(30) days after the date of publication of the Ordinance and this notice, the question of the issuance of the Bonds shall be submitted to the electors of the City at the election to be held at the general primary election on the 20th day of March, 2012. The Circuit Court may declare that an emergency referendum should be held prior to said election date pursuant to the provisions of Section 2A-1.4 of the Election Code of the State of Illinois, as amended. By order of the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of August, 2011. /s/Beth Warren City Clerk, United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois CH 12_2626120.2 Alternative A-2 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Series 2011 Refunds 2005D and 2008 ORIGINAL 15 Year Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+l 12/30/2011 - - - 12/30/2012 - - 612,203.28 612,203.28 12/30/20I3 760,000.00 1.550% 432,992.50 1,192,992.50 12/30/2014 770,000.00 1.950% 421,212.50 1,191,212.50 12/30/2015 790,000.00 2.350% 406 197.50 1,196,197.50 12/30/2016 805,000.00 2.650% 387,632.50 1,192,632.50 12/30/2017 825,000.00 3.050% 366,300.00 1,191,300.00 12/30/2018 855,000.00 3.400% 341,137,50 1,196,137.50 12/30/2019 880,000.00 3.750% 312,067.50 1,192,067.50 12/30/2020 915,000.00 4.000% 279,067.50 1,194 067.50 12/30/2021 950,000.00 4.200% 242,467.50 1,192,467.50 12/30/2022 990,000.00 4.500% 202,567.50 1,192,567.50 12/30/2023 1,035,000.00 4.700% 158,017.50 1,193,017.50 12/30/2024 1,085,000.00 4.850% 109,372.50 1,194,372.50 12/30/2025 1 135 000.00 5.000% 56 750.00 1,191,750.00 Total $11,795,000.00 - $4,327,985.78 $16,122,985.78 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $104,911.82 Average Life 8.895 Years Average Coupon 4.1253558% Net Interest Cost(NIC) 4.2152980% True Interest Cost(TIC) 4.1766320% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 4.0665004% All Inclusive Cost(AIC) 4.3159900% IRS Form 8038 Net interest Cost 4.1253558% Wei hted Average Maturity 8.895 Years Ser 2011 Ref 2005D 20081 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5/1612011 1 9:44 AM � r r .r- `,SAD C►p 011% Memorandum To: City Council EST 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: .y� p Date: August 5, 2011 �.MQW* Subject: Bond refinancing LE Executive Summary Approval of an authorizing ordinance (attached) for a 15-year refunding bond, which is the first step of the process for refinancing the 2005D and 2008 Rob Roy bond obligations into more favorable terms. Refunding these two bonds can be done at minimal incremental cost, and will allow the City to complete the River Road Bridge project, Route 47 expansion, Game Farm Road expansion, and dedicate additional funds each year for road resurfacing. Background and Recommendation from Administration Committee This item was last discussed by City Council at the May 24th meeting. At that meeting, the City Council discussed different refinancing options for existing debt, and ultimately forwarded the issue to the Administration Committee. The Administration Committee has reviewed this item for two months, and has ultimately recommended refinancing of two of the largest sewer debt obligations in the City(2005D and 2008 bonds). At the June Administration Committee meeting, the Committee reviewed different refinancing terms and options. Their concern at that meeting was our ability to fund other infrastructure obligations in the City (i.e. roads) during the term of the refinancing bond. So, the Committee directed show different refinancing scenarios and how those refinancing scenarios allow additional money to be set aside for other infrastructure obligations each year. At the July Administration Committee, the attached spreadsheet labeled"Chart 1"was presented. This chart shows the City's different refinancing options, and how much could be set aside each year for road projects. Ultimately, the Committee recommended the 15-year refinancing option, as the term was short enough to incur very little additional interest costs, the yearly payment could be entirely covered by the non-home rule sales tax, about$300,000 could be set aside each year for road projects, and City property taxes could be substantially decreased next year. The attached spreadsheet labeled"Chart 2"was presented at the July Administration Committee. This spreadsheet shows the impact of refinancing and not refinancing on property taxes that are due solely to bond obligations. While the committee liked the initial 79% decrease in property taxes associated with refinancing, they did not like the corresponding 1-2%property tax increases the following years and the looming, large debt obligations in 2020. Also, concern was expressed that the residents would see year-over-year City property tax increases on their bill after the first year of a dramatic decrease, as the City's general fund property tax would be shown on a property tax bill as combined with the property taxes associated with non-abated debt obligations—and since general fund property taxes typically rise each year according to inflation. So, the Committee recommended that we structure the remaining non-abated debt obligations in such a manner that residents would see City property tax decreases for the next several years. That recommended structure is attached in"Chart 3". Budgetary impact Besides the ability to budget for yearly road improvements, the refinancing also creates a unique opportunity for the City to delay debt service payments that are due in December 2011. Refinancing will essentially reset the clock on those payments, pushing them back until December 2012. This means that non-home rule sales taxes and other budgeted revenues can be used to adequately fund(without borrowing!) Route 47 expansion in FY 12 through FY 15 and River Road Bridge in FY 12 through FY 13. Also, staff is preliminarily projecting that Game Farm Road expansion could be afforded in FY 15 with borrowing—however, we anticipate that in FY 15 and beyond we will be able to afford the debt service payments on that bond through budgeting. Staff Recommendation Staff's recommendation is the same as the Administration Committee's recommendation: to refinance the 2005D and 2008 bonds into a 2011 bond with a 15-year term, for the reasons stated above. Next steps If the City Council wishes to accept the recommendation of the Administration Committee, an authorizing ordinance (attached)must be approved. The entire refinancing process, as it relates to City Council action is: 1) Authorizing ordinance must be approved at the August 9th City Council meeting 2) Public hearing on the refunding bond will be held at the August 23rd City Council meeting a. Public notice will be published in local newspapers between August 10th and 12th 3) Bond ordinance, to be considered at the September 27th City Council meeting No refi 30 year 14 year 15 year 17 year 20 year FY Payment $for Roads Payment $for Roads Payment $for Roads Payment $for Roads Payment $for Roads Payment $for Roads 2012 $1,496,040 $ $ - $ 1,248,020 $ - $ 1,248,020 $ - $1,248,020 $ - $ 1,248,020 $ - $ 1,248,020 2013 $2,054,540 $ $ 1,474,921 $ 25,079 $ 608,587 $ 891,413 $ 612,203 $ 887,797 $ 914,928 $ 585,072 $ 627,798 $ 872,202 2014 $2,088,140 $ $ 1,458,897 $ 41,103 $ 1,190,435 $ 309,565 $ 1,192,992 $ 307,008 $ 939,920 $ 560,080 $ 949,022 $ 550,978 2015 $2,317,590 $ $ 1,461,305 $ 38,695 $ 1,188,655 $ 311,345 $ 1,191,212 $ 308,788 $ 938,860 $ 561,140 $ 947,962 $ 552,038 2016 $3,234,590 $ $ 1,458,782 $ 41,218 $ 1,193,640 $ 306,360 $ 1,196,197 $ 303,803 $ 940,700 $ 559,300 $ 949,802 $ 550,198 2017 $1,095,090 $ 404,910 $ 1,461,170 $ 38,830 $ 1,190,075 $ 309,925 $ 1,192,632 $ 307,368 $ 940,300 $ 559,700 $ 949,402 $ 550,598 2018 $1,091,408 $ 408,592 $ 1,454,237 $ 45,763 $ 1,188,742 $ 311,258 $ 1,191,300 $ 308,700 $ 938,110 $ 561,890 $ 947,212 $ 552,788 2019 $ $ 1,500,000 $ 1,461,722 $ 38,278 $ 1,193,580 $ 306,420 $ 1,196,137 $ 303,863 $ 938,530 $ 561,470 $ 947,632 $ 552,368 2020 $ $ 1,500,000 $ 1,458,372 $ 41,628 $ 1,189,510 $ 310,490 $ 1,192,067 $ 307,933 $ 941,880 $ 558,120 $ 950,982 $ 549,018 2021 $ $ 1,500,000 $ 1,469,060 $ 30,940 $ 1,191,510 $ 308,490 $ 1,194,067 $ 305,933 $ 937,330 $ 562,670 $ 946,432 $ 553,568 2022 $ $ 1,500,000 $ 969,060 $ 530,940 $ 1,189,910 $ 310,090 $ 1,192,467 $ 307,533 $ 940,795 $ 559,205 $ 949,897 $ 550,103 2023 $ $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,190,010 $ 309,990 $ 1,192,567 $ 307,433 $ 942,117 $ 557,883 $ 951,220 $ 548,780 2024 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ 1,760,460 $ (260,460) $ 1,193,017 $ 306,983 $ 1,476,517 $ 23,483 $ 950,620 $ 549,380 2025 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ 1,730,025 $ (230,025) $ 1,194,372 $ 305,628 $ 1,476,117 $ 23,883 $ 947,690 $ 552,310 2026 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,191,750 $ 308,250 $ 1,471,742 $ 28,258 $ 947,675 $ 552,325 2027 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ - $1,500,000 $ 1,493,242 $ 6,758 $ 950,275 $ 549,725 2028 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $1,500,000 $ 1,135,452 $ 364,548 $ 950,922 $ 549,078 2029 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $1,500,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 949,187 $ 550,813 2030 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ 950,412 $ 549,588 2031 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ $1,500,000 $ $ 1,500,000 $ 948,892 $ 551,108 Total Cost $ 14,127,526 $ 16,005,139 $ 16,122,980 $ 17,366,540 $ 17,713,034 .0 *All money in FY 12 will be put towards Route 47 and River Road Bridge Property tax scenarios,studying bonds only Assumptions Assumption for refi scenario is that Rob Roy bonds will be paid for entirely by sales taxes, and the rest is used for road improvements Assumption for"no refi" scenario is that all non-home rule sales taxes go towards bonds, and none are used for road improvements Assumption for"no refi" scenarios is that 2007A(water) and 2005A(debt service), and 2004B bonds will stay on property taxes (non-abatement) Assumption for refi scenario is that 2007A(water), 2005A(debt service) will stay on property taxes (non-abatement) Assumption for all scenarios is no growth in the local economy %increase, Refi (all %increase, No refi year-to-year scenarios) year-to-year 2012 $ 2,212,735 $ 2,212,735 -42.23% -79.22% 2013 $ 1,278,223 $ 459,833 11.34% 1.39% 2014 $ 1,423,110 $ 466,220 22.16% 0.17% 2015 $ 1,738,542 $ 467,002 53.16% 0.08% 2016 $ 2,662,787 $ 467,372 -80.12% 1.06% 2017 $ 529,432 $ 472,342 0.81% -0.14% 2018 $ 533,712 $ 471,704 -100.00% 0.79% 2019 $ - $ 475,407 #DIV/0! 140.50% 2020 $ - $ 1,143,356 #DIV/0! -1.42% 2021 $ - $ 1,127,131 #DIV/0! 0.65% 2022 $ - $ 1,134,469 #DIV/0! -0.42% 2023 $ - $ 1,129,656 #DIV/0! -100.00% 2024 $ - $ - Chart 3 FY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 City property tax (non-library, estimate) $2,600,000 $2,639,000 $2,691,780 $2,745,616 $2,800,528 $2,856,538 Non-abatement property taxes $2,212,735 $730,000 $590,000 $460,000 $320,000 $250,000 Total $4,812,735 $3,369,000 $3,281,780 $3,205,616 $3,120,528 $3,106,538 Percentage change each year -30.0% -2.6% -2.3% -2.7% -0.4% $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 ■Non-abatement property taxes $2,000,000 ■City property tax(non-library) $1,000,000 - it $0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 D Cip 4 o Memorandum To: City Council EST. 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator p Date: July 15, 2011 �N �� Subject: Refinancing options for Rob Roy bonds LE This item was last discussed by the Administration Committee at the June meeting. At that meeting, the Committee asked for information related to the amount of money that could be dedicated to year-to-year road improvements under different refinancing scenarios (first chart), and the property tax bill associated with bond non-abatements under a no refinancing and refinancing scenario (second chart). There are a few items of note in each chart. First, the first chart shows a net present value calculation for each bond refinancing term. At the last meeting, the staff stated that the 15-year refinancing term actually had a negative net present value—which means you could make a strong fiscal argument for refinancing. What we have learned from the last meeting, is that all of the refinancing scenarios presented have a negative net present value; so, by pushing payments off well into the future, refinancing becomes advantageous from a cash-flow perspective and an overall fiscal policy. With that particular issue settled, the question now becomes one of term length, which is the second item of note. A ten year bond will allow almost no money for road resurfacing for the 10 years it is in existence, but it will allow for maximum dollars to be used in 2022. On the other end of the spectrum, a twenty year bond will allow as much as $550,000 per year to be used on road resurfacing while the bond is in existence,but does not allow maximum dollars to be used until 2032. The 14-year, 15-year, and 17-year issuances are in-between. The third item of note is contained within the second chart. This shows the comparison over time between property taxes associated with bonds and non-abatements under a refinancing and no refinancing scenario. With the introduction of the non-home rule sales tax, the City does have the ability to cut bond-related property taxes by 42%next year,but those property taxes will increase substantially each year beyond that until 2016. Under any refinancing scenario, the City has the ability to not only remove the Rob Roy bonds from property taxes,but remove a third sewer bond from property taxes. Non-home rule sales taxes would not be used to clear that third sewer bond from property taxes; we are able to afford its abatement from the tax bills over the next 8 years because of the payment schedule of the refinancing bond(namely, that there is no payment due in December 2011 and a minimal payment in December 2012). Finally, the fourth item of note is the year-to-year increase in the second chart under both scenarios. While the change in property taxes from year-to-year generally drops off in 2013 and then gradually increases over time, we have the ability to reverse that trend. In essence, asking for slightly more in 2013 than we need and then banking that money for future bond payments when they are higher. This model would allow us to reduce overall property taxes (not just the taxes associated with the bonds) each year for several years. 0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 A o J Legal ❑ Q ZBA#1 111, T 11 "AM Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Tracking Number City Administrator ■ °°°�^o�$ed' �O Consultant C—ty ❑ Kentlall ZBA 2011-01 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Herron Property- Signage &Parking Lot Setback Variance Request in the B-3 District Meeting and Date: ZBA/August 9, 2011 Synopsis: Consideration of a request for variances from parking lot setback requirements along Route 34 in the B-3 District and sign size and height variances for Business Zoning Districts, as a result of the future widening and reconstruction of Il Rte 47. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: N/A Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff report. D C/r Memorandum o J To: City Council EST. -� _ less From: Krysti I Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator p Date: August 4, 2011 �oa 5as Subject: ZBA 2011-01 y<<E 1`►� 9675 Route 34 (Herron Property) Signage & Parking Lot Setback Variance Request in the B-3 District Background &Request: The applicant, Kathleen Herron, owns the commercial retail strip property located at 9675 Route 34 which currently rents tenant space to Katydidit Flowers, Kendall Printing and Ugly's Hot Dogs (see attached. The approximately 12,000-sq. foot property is zoned B-3 Service Business District, which requires a minimum 20-foot parking lot setback from the property line when adjacent to an arterial roadway such as Route 34. Due to the future widening and reconstruction of Route 47 at the intersection of Route 34, IDOT will acquire a portion of the property's frontage through eminent domain for additional State right-of- way. As a result of this condemnation action,the property owner is requesting the following variances: 1. Relief from Section 10-7-D-4-E-1 of the Zoning Ordinance to reduce the required parking lot setback along Route 34 from twenty(20) feet to zero(0)feet. 2. Relief from Section 8-11-9-A-1 of the Sign Code to install a new permanent ground sign which exceeds the maximum permitted sign area of 32 square feet and overall height of eight (8) feet. 3. Approval to install a temporary sign, no larger in area and height than the proposed new permanent sign, during the period in which the reconstruction project is on-going. Zoning Board of Appeals Action: The Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed the request at a public hearing held on August 3, 2011 and made the following motions: 1. Motion to approve a variance from Section 10-7-D-4-E-1 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduction in the required parking lot setback along Route 34 from twenty (20) feet to zero (0) feet. Baker-yes;Hirsch-yes; Woods-yes; Walker-yes; Johnson-yes 5 ayes; 0 no 2. Motion to recommend approval of a variance from Section 8-11-9-A-1 of the Sign Code to permit a new 13-foot tall double-faced illuminated ground sign with a sign area measuring 6 feet 6 inches-by-6 feet 6 inches as depicted in plans prepared by Aurora Sign Company dated 4/8/11. Baker-yes; Hirsch-yes; Woods-yes; Walker-yes; Johnson-yes 5 ayes; 0 no 3. Motion to recommend approval of a temporary sign, no larger than 6 feet 6 inches-by-6 feet 6 inches in area and 13-feet in height to be installed during the period in which the reconstruction project is on-going. Baker-yes;Hirsch-yes; Woods-yes; Walker-yes; Johnson-yes 5 ayes; 0 no STANDARDS FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE: The Zoning Board of Appeals based its decision to vary the parking lot setback regulations of the Zoning Ordinance upon the following standards (Section 10-14-5C): 1. Because the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations was carried out. 2. The conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not applicable,generally,to other property within the same zoning classification. 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Title and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. 5. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets, or increase the danger to the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. SIGN VARIATIONS (SECTION 8-11-13): In addition to the procedures and standards listed in Section 10-15-5 of the Zoning Code regarding variations from the requirements, the Zoning Board of Appeals also considered the following factors related to sign variance requests: 1. If the sign was erected legally with a sign permit. 2. If there are any unique physical characteristics of the property. 3. If there are limited available locations for signage on the property. 4. The cost to the applicant of complying with the sign ordinance requirements. 5. If the sign is on or faces a street with a forty(40)mile per hour or higher speed limit. 6. If the sign is on a street with twenty thousand(20,000) or higher vehicle trips per day. 7. If the sign would be blocked by existing or required landscaping. 8. If it is a wall sign facing a public right-of-way without a public entrance. Staff Comments &Recommendation: According to Section 10-14-5 (D) of the Municipal Code, the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) has authority to make a final determination regarding the parking lot setback reduction request. As stated above, the ZBA granted approval of the request. However, Sign Code variances are not covered by this provision of the Code. Therefore, the ZBA has made recommendations to the City Council regarding the sign variance requests. Based upon the findings of fact, Staff recommends approval of the requested sign variances as recommended by the ZBA. For your reference, attached is staff's memorandum to the ZBA and draft ordinance. Ordinance No. 2011- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, APPROVING SIGN VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9675 ROUTE 34/VETERAN'S PARKWAY (Herron Property) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, Kathleen Herron is the owner (the "Owner") of commercial property located at 9675 Route 34 (Veteran's Parkway), Yorkville, Illinois, which is 12,000 square feet in area and zoned B-3 Service Business District (the "Subject Property") legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference; and, WHEREAS, the Owner has requested that the Mayor and City Council of the City(collectively, the "Corporate Authorities") grant relief from the sign regulations in Section 8-11-9-A-1 of the Yorkville City Code (the "City Code") to install a new permanent ground sign which exceeds the maximum permitted sign area of thirty-two 32 square feet and overall height of eight (8') feet; and a variance to the sign regulations in Section 8-I1-9-B of the City Code to allow a temporary sign, not to exceed the permitted dimensions, throughout the entire reconstruction period of Route 34 (Veteran's Parkway); and, WHEREAS, the Owner also requested approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals a variance from Section 10-7-D-4-E-1 of the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance to reduce the required parking lot setback along Route 34 from twenty(20) feet to zero (0) feet: and, WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals ("ZBA") convened and held a public hearing on the 3rd day of August, 2011, to consider the variance requests after publication of notice and notice to property owners within five hundred(500) feet of the Subject Property; and, WHEREAS, the ZBA reviewed the standards set forth in Section 10-14-5(C), Section 8-11-5 and Section 10-15-5 of the City Code, and found that the requested variances met the standards for granting such variances; and, WHEREAS, upon conclusion of said public hearing, the ZBA approved the parking lot variance requested for a zero setback and recommended to the Corporate Authorities the approval of the sign variances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2 That the Corporate Authorities hereby acknowledge the approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals of a variance with conditions from Section 10-7-D-4-E-1 of the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance reducing the required parking lot setback along Route 34 from twenty (20) feet to zero (0) feet for the property legally described on Exhibit A. Section 3. That the variance request for relief from the sign regulations in Section 8-11-9-A-1 of the City Code to install a new permanent ground sign which exceeds the maximum permitted sign area of thirty-two 32 square feet and overall height of eight (8') feet be and is hereby granted by allowing the maximum sign area of said sign to be six feet four inches (6'4") by six feet four inches (6"4") and with an overall height of not more than thirteen (13.0) feet; and a variance to the sign regulations in Section 8-11-9-B of the City Code to allow a temporary sign, not to exceed the permitted dimensions, throughout the entire reconstruction period of Route 34 (Veteran's Parkway); for the property legally described on Exhibit A and as shown on the sign plan dated April 8, 2011 prepared by the Aurora Sign Company. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2011. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2011. MAYOR 2 Memorandum J g To: Zoning Board of Appeals EST. -� !a7� �s36 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director --�- CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: July 28, 2011 Subject: ZBA 2011-01 <LE kV 9675 Route 34 (Herron Property) Signage & Parking Lot Setback Variance Request in the B-2 District ZBA PUBLIC HEARING: The City has received an application for variances from the City's Zoning Ordinance and Sign Code. A public hearing has been scheduled before the Zoning Board of Appeals to be held on Wednesday, August 3,2011, at 7:00 pm at the Yorkville Public Library Meeting Room(902 Game Farm Road). BACKGROUND &REQUEST: The applicant, Kathleen Herron, owns the commercial retail strip property located at 9675 Route 34 which currently rents tenant space to Katydidit Flowers, Kendall Printing and Ugly's Hot Dogs (see attached. The approximately 12,000-sq. foot property is zoned B-3 Service Business District, which requires a minimum 20-foot parking lot setback from the property line when adjacent to an arterial roadway such as Route 34. Due to the pending widening and reconstruction of Route 47 at the intersection of Route 34 less than 500 feet west of the subject property, the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) is in the process of acquiring a portion of the property's frontage through eminent domain for additional State right- of-way. As a result of this condemnation action, the property will no longer conform to the required parking lot setback. Therefore,the applicant is seeking relief from Section 10-7-D-4-E-1 of the Zoning Ordinance to reduce the required parking lot setback along Route 34 from twenty (20) feet to zero (0)feet. Also as part of the road widening and reconstruction project, the existing monopole ground sign will be removed. The applicant is requesting relief from Section 8-11-9-A-1 of the Sign Code to install a new permanent ground sign which exceeds the maximum permitted sign area of 32 square feet and overall height of eight (8) feet. The proposed new double-faced illuminated ground sign will have a sign area of approximately 40 square feet with an overall height of 13'-6". The brick and stone-capped base material is designed to match the existing building fagade material as required by the Sign Code. Finally, the applicant is seeking approval to install a temporary sign, no larger in area and height than the proposed new permanent sign, during the period in which the reconstruction project is on-going. After completion of the road project, the temporary sign will be removed and the permanent sign installed. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing monopole sign does not conform to the recently adopted Sign Code criteria with regards to size,height or materials. In 2010, the City Council granted a variance (Ord. 2010-26) allowing those existing ground signs located along Rte. 47 and Rte. 34 to remain if they were in substantial conformance with the current Sign Code criteria or would not be removed/relocated as a result of the Route 47 widening and reconstruction project. The subject property's sign was not included as part of that variance. The Route 47 widening and reconstruction project will acquire approximately 1,120 sq. feet of land along the frontage of the subject property. The applicant's new front property line and parking lot will be immediately adjacent to the proposed new Route 34 right-of-way. Route 34 is a major arterial roadway which has a posted maximum speed limit of 40 miles per hour (mph) in this area and an average annual daily traffic volume (ADT) of approximately 123,000 vehicles'. STANDARDS FOR GRANTING A VARIANCE: The Zoning Board of Appeals must base its decision to vary, or recommend varying, any regulation of the Zoning Ordinance upon the following standards(Section 10-14-5C): 1. Because the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the specific property involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result,as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations was carried out. 2. The conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based are unique to the property for which the variation is sought and are not applicable, generally,to other property within the same zoning classification. 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Title and has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. 5. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets, or increase the danger to the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. SIGN VARIATIONS(SECTION 8-11-13): In addition to the procedures and standards listed in Section 10-15-5 of the Zoning Code regarding variations from the requirements, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall also consider the following factors related to sign variance requests: 1. If the sign was erected legally with a sign permit. 2. If there are any unique physical characteristics of the property. 3. If there are limited available locations for signage on the property. 4. The cost to the applicant of complying with the sign ordinance requirements. 5. If the sign is on or faces a street with a forty(40)mile per hour or higher speed limit. 6. If the sign is on a street with twenty thousand(20,000) or higher vehicle trips per day. 7. If the sign would be blocked by existing or required landscaping. 8. If it is a wall sign facing a public right-of-way without a public entrance. ' Source:2009 Illinois Department of Transportation(IDOT)Statistical maps htW://www.dot.il.;zov/trafficmMs/table.htm ZBA ACTION: Upon closing the hearing, staff requests that the Zoning Board of Appeals make its findings for variance based upon each of the standards listed above and evidence provided by the testimony given and the application. The purpose of the standards is to help guide you in making your decision. Municipal Code 10-14-5 (D) outlines occasions when the Zoning Board of Appeals may make a final determination. However, Sign Code variances are not covered by this Section. Therefore, the ZBA will be making a final determination regarding the parking lot setback reduction request and a recommendation to the City Council regarding the he sign variance request. After making your findings, a recommendation regarding the sign variance request will then be forwarded to the City Council. Your recommendation for either of the requests may be to approve the requested variance(s), recommend approval of the requested variance(s) with condition(s) or recommend denial of the requested variance(s). U 15 United City of Yorkville D 39 800 Game Farm Road JUN 2 4 2011 Yorkville Illinois 60560 � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Telenhone: 630-553-4350 DEPARTMENT CFax: 630-553-3436 ZBA# APPLICATION VARIANCE REQUEST Date of Submission: _� - Z �-f . �A f 1. Name of Petitioner(s): Kathleen Herron Address: 7350 Tamiami Trail, Suite 207, Sarasota, Florida 34231 Phone Number: 941-350-8653 Fax Number: 941-488-5856 Email Address: kathleenherron @comcast.net 2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from#1: LK HERRON, LLC If legal title is held in a land trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: n/a 4. a. Street address and physical location of subject property: 9675 Route 34, Yorkville, Illinois b. Proposed name of subdivision (if any): n/a c. .Legal description of property for which zoning variance is sought: See attached Exhibit "A" (If more space is needed, attach as "Exhibit A".) d. Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of property for which variance is sought: 02-28-176-005 United City of Yorkville Variance Request Application Revised- INN 40 5. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners and property owners within 500 feet of subject parcel for which variance is requested entitled to notice of petition under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: (Attach a separate list as"Exhibit 13".) See attached Exhibit "B" 6. State the variance requested and the City ordinance including the section numbers to be varied: G e Q..lac1, ,7 Lxi— k... 11r,11 IJL 411Gl,L L1111l1L 7. Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: Attorney: Name: Thomas W. Grant, Attorney at Law Address: 200 Hillcrest Avenue, PO Box 326, Yorkville, IL 60560 Phone Number: 630-553--0088 Fax Number: 630-553-0299 Email Address: twgrantlaw @sbcglobal.net 8. Submit application with a filing fee in the amount of$85.00. Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of$500 deposit for consultants (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). In addition, owner/developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public hearing. Should owner/developer not pay these fees directly, they will be responsible for reimbursing the United City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs. 9. Submit 35 copies of each of the application, proposed drawings, location map, site plan, and any other pertinent materials, and one CD containing electronic copies(pdf) of each of the application (complete with exhibits), drawings, map, and site plan to the Community Development Department. Large items must be folded to fit in a 10"x 13"envelope. United City of Yorkville Variance Request Application Revised: 1.2,).N 41 In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct: Petitioner(s) or legal property owner's signature must appear on thi ica Kath en - moron a --HERRON, LLC By- . Gr t, Attorney in Fact Subscribed and sworn before me this day of i�c�z ,24)c ad// ry Public — 'OFFICIAL SEAL, PATRICIA ANN BENES11 NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF ILLINOIS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1111121" Notary Stamp THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. United City orYorkvdle Variance Request App[Lcatton Revised I {1q LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL ONE: That part of the North West 114 of Section 28, Township 37 North,Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the East right of way line of Illinois Route 47 with the center line of U.S. Route 34; thence South 83°46'47"East along the center line of U.S. Route 34, 378.21 feet for the point of beginning;thence North 4° 52' 00" East,parallel with the East right of way line of Illinois Route 47, 6I.08 feet; thence North 51 13'00"East parallel with said East right of way line, 188.92 feet;thence South 83°46'47"East parallel with the center line of U.S.Route 34, 60 feet;thence South 5° 13'00" West parallel with the East right of way Iine of Illinois Route 47, 188.93 feet; thence South 4° 52'00"West 61.07 feet to the center line of U.S. Route 34;thence North 83°46' 47" West along said center line, 60 feet to the point of beginning; (excepting therefrom that part of above described premises conveyed to the State of Illinois by a Deed recorded July 29, 1974 as document 74- 3609) in the Township of Bristol,Kendall County,Illinois. PARCEL TWO: Easement for the benefit of Parcel One as created by Deed from Bob D. Thomas and Gloria M. Thomas, his wife,to Willard E. Harthan dated March 8, 1976 and recorded March 10, 1976 as Document 76-1031 for ingress and egress over that part of the following described lands the Northerly boundary of said Easement being approximately 66 feet North of the curbline of U.S.Route 34: TRACT A: That part of the North West 114 of Section 28,Township 37 North,Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the East right of way line of Illinois Route 47 and the center line of U.S. Route 34;thence Easterly along the center line of U.S. Route 34 a distance of 282.2 i feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing Easterly along said center line 96 feet; thence Northerly parallel with the East right of way line of Illinois Route 47 a distance of 250 feet; thence Westerly parallel with the center line of U.S.Route 34 a distance of 96 feet;thence Southerly parallel with the East Right of way line of Illinois Route 47 a distance of 250 feet to the point of beginning; in the Township of Bristol,Kendall County,Illinois,the entrance located on the said premises being approximately 37 feet in width,the Easterly point being approximately 53 feet Westerly from the Easterly property line of said lands; and TRACT B: That part of the North West 114 of Section 28, Township 37 North,Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the East right of way line of Illinois Route 47 with the center line of U.S.Route 34;thence South 83°46'47" East along the center line of U.S. Route 34,438.21 feet to the Southeasterly corner of property owned by Bob D. Thomas and Gloria Thomas, as described in Trustee Deed from the Old Second National Bank of Aurora and recorded as Document 72-3776 in the Recorders Office of Kendall County,Illinois, for the point of beginning; thence North 4° 52' 00" East along the Easterly line of said Thomas property, 61.07 feet;thence North 5° 13'00"East along said Easterly line, 188.93 feet to the Northeasterly corner of said Thomas property; thence South 83°46'47" East parallel with the center line of U.S.Route 34,being along the extension Easterly of the Northerly line of the aforesaid Thomas property 100.0 feet; thence South 5° 07'52" West, 250.0 feet to a point on the center line of U.S. Route 34 which is South 83°46"47"East from the point of beginning;thence North 83°46'47" West along said center line, 100.0 feet to the point of beginning, in the Township of Bristol,Kendall County,Illinois;the entrance located on said premises being approximately 37 feet in width the Easterly point being approximately 29 feet Westerly from the Easterly line of said land. P.I.N.: 02-28-176-005 COMMON ADDRESS: 9675 Route 34, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 C BLDG cn r3KC0130 C! 3KC.01327,- WAl h h 14 rFFi 4@ lqe.4 44 9XZtk 5- t3,c 9p JAIC. 7e?'ICZO' ST Z•-VQ&Y Af:rZe- Ak POB 16 "1 Ul —S OT-Ull 1A'3 PO B 31 :1 2 L 5% 190 694 RM + OM.46�j f;MD Ap POS 3) T TT rr r;"71 EXiSTING ROW E OB p 9 m POB -11 POS 3) �QFFy3Eb If J IL -8 -- ---- --- ---- ------— - 521 )+>3.729° + 3.729 I.57'.' q- 3T oli L .48 L 4 LT C O'l +1 J333 23 12.0 3 m LT LT ffg:.-451-j(�) ,T.105 m 1 - ------- -- ------ - ---- --- ---------- --- igl+Loo- 190+150 BEARING S 843-52" E -U-S L----7 - ----. -5 - -- -- - - - ----- -RLL PT STA 190+106.236 -8--3 "6 (143.56'1 1116 f/ t4 .782 m Ffl.4FI ---- - --- - - _/-- --- -11'21-- ------ - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - -- -- ---- - -- ---- -- -^- ............ - -- ---- -- - - ----- ----- 6 - _ _ - ---__ � ___ ---- -- __-__� ------- --- STA J90+12m% (273.18') EXISTING ROW LINE N 84129'25,• w J-9,006 fn �?, , 2� PIN ownerl_nam ownerl_add ownerl_a_1 ownerl_esz 02-28-126-015 MENARD INC. 4777 MENARD DR EAU CLAIRE WI 54703 02-28-177-002 TDC YORKVILLE SHOPPING CTR I %TDC YORKVILLE SELECT LLC 799 CENTRAL AVE STE 300 HIGHLAND PARK IL 60035 02-28-177-025 TDC YORKVILLE SHOPPING CTR I %TDC YORKVILLE SELECT LLC 799 CENTRAL AVE STE 300 HIGHLAND PARK IL 60035 02-28-177-036 PROGRESS HOLDINGS LLC 4277 BLACKSTONE CT MIDDLETON NY 53562 02-28-176-012 FIRST NATIONAL BANK DEKALB PATEL KISHOR ET AL 1510 A N BRIDGE ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 02-28-176-015 1ST NATL BANK DEKALB %KISHOR PATEL 1510 A N BRIDGE ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 02-28-177-005 TRI-R CORP 9620 RTE 34 YORKVILLE IL 60560 02-28-176-018 YORKVILLE MOOSE LODGE 2371 1502 N BRIDGE ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 02-28-177-026 CENTRUE BANK ATTN:ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 122 W MADISON OTTAWA IL 61350 02-28-126-006 1ST NATL BANK JOLIET 1190 JOLIET ST WEST CHICAGO IL 60185 02-28-177-006 TRI-R CORP 9620 RTE 34 YORKVILLE IL 60560 02-28-176-016 AMER NATL BANK&TR OF CHIC %L SYREGELAS 2520 BOEGER AVE WESTCHESTER IL 60153 02-28-176-014 ALGONQUIN STATE BANK %STEPINA MANAGEMENT LTD PO BOX 546 LARGO FL 337790546 02-28-177-034 PROGRESS HOLDINGS LLC 4277 BLACKSTONE CT MIDDLETON NY 53562 02.28-177-027 TDC YORKVILLE SHOPPING CTR I %TDC YORKVILLE SELECT LLC 799 CENTRAL AVE STE 300 HIGHLAND PARK IL 60035 02-28-176-005 HERRON KATHLEEN A 7350 TAMIAMI TRL STE 207 SARASOTA FL 34231 02-28-176-007 MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK %H D&B PARTNERSHIP 8071/2 N BRIDGE ST YORKVILLE IL 60560 02-28-177-028 GRECO/REGGI YORKVILLE JMP LLC 1550 HECHT DR BARTLETT IL 60103 02-28-176-006 ITASCA BANK&TRUSTTR 10397 308 W IRVING PARK RD ITASCA IL 60143 02-28-177-035 PROGRESS HOLDINGS LLC 4277 BLACKSTONE CT MIDDLETON NY 53562 02-28-176-004 DUY TOD M&GILLET-DUY KARLA 1290 CINDY LN SANDWICH IL 60548 02-28-177-033 I M PROPERTIES LLC %INDUSTRY CONSULTING GROUP INC P 0 BOX 1919 WICHITA FALLS TX 76307 02-28-176-019 RWJ YORKVILLE LLC ATTN.BOB JUCKINESS 1010 JORIE BLVD#322 OAK BROOK IL 60523 02-28-176-020 RWJ YORKVILLE LLC ATTN:BOB JUCKINESS 1010 JORIE BLVD#322 OAK BROOK IL 60523 T a - r r _ Y — n wk dim e If - - 1. . 3 .ate On per:- F ~o aF 7 r pt � f'i7kp to 162 Y, 10-18508 t 112-29-177-025 +.3. rtts85q. y' Pt.6 96 EXHIBIT "C" APPLICATION VARIANCE REQUEST PETITIONER/APPLICANT: Kathleen Herron and LK Herron, LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS: 9675 Route 34, Yorkville, Illinois 6 - (continued): State the Variance Requested and the City Ordinance including the Section Numbers to be varied: (a) Application is made to permit a free-standing business sign with the following dimensions: SIGNAGE (i) 64" by 64" inches in area(Code Section 8-11-9-A-1). (ii) With an overall height of 13' 6" from ground level (Code Section 8-11-9- A-1). (iii) Permit a Temporary Sign, not to exceed the dimensions set forth in Subparagraph (a) above, throughout the entire period of the reconstruction of US Route 34 (Veteran's Parkway) following the removal of the current sign by the Illinois Department of Transportation(Code Section 8-11-9-13). (iv) See Exhibit "D" for illustrative diagram of proposed sign setting forth dimensions. PARKING LOT (i) Reduce required setback for parking surface adjacent to Route 34 (Veteran's Parkway) from the required 20' to 0' (Code Section 10-7-D-4-E-1). SUMMARY OF APPLICATION This Application for Variance Request is filed as a result of the proposed reconstruction and expansion of U.S. Route 34 (Veteran's Parkway), by the Illinois Department of Transportation. The Illinois Department of Transportation is acquiring, by eminent domain, a portion of the Petitioner's property which will result in: A) The removal and relocation of the Applicant's advertising sign and B) The relocation of the Right-of-Way into the current parking lot servicing the business/commercial uses on the property. TAReal Estate.20111Hcrron\EXHIBIT C.doc -- AURORA- "GN CO �•u.•,ace • •t luw,n ern.,oTe • '� Kty ' dldIFlowers � . Kendall Printing ;�w 1. - I f41�LYlYlti4 'IiT�.iL L]:1f14?A'TD F"m, slA,, �kSN.f,rt a ryl LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED "fir sry 1 '�Y !A I'IhT21'6 4 t tl Y - . - DOUDLE-FACED ILLUMINATED 51GN i FABPICATI'AND INSTALL SIGN OF ALUMINUM AND STEEL ANGLE. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FACE5 TO BE WHITE ACRYLIC WITH COPY APPLIED FIRST SURFACE. BOTH ISGN5 TO BE REMOVED AND DISPOSED. ALL EXP05ED METAL SURFACES TO BE COATED WITH ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE. 5ET 5"X 17 4"STEEL FIVE IN 2'X 7 CONCRETE FOOTING INTERNAL ILLUMNIATIO14 TO BE HIGH OUTPUT FLUORE5GENT LAMP5. TO DEPTH OF 4'. SCALE 112"=1' CONNECT TO ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I BY OTHERS PRIOR TO INSTALL. 1100 Rout.34 PfrpacdPor ;Addau: l0 4/43/fl "`• R^ Aurora,Illinois 60504 9675 ROUTE 34 9675 ROUTE 34 — .__..._. .., 6308995900o1£te �°""°°�• [sgs„cr YORKVILLE.IL 630 898 6091 tax MDTE THIS DRAWING IS THE PR0PE0.TY OF AURORA 84N 1;0 TF E7 MOT 10 RE REp0.0OUCE0.CDPEEO,ON P NI!{fED IN ANY FA5HbM WNHOUI WRITTEN CONSENT FROM AURORA INGN CO CHARGES OF SIP TO SZN[Ibo WALL RE AIGESIED FOR ANT 183-ink Of TRR.NE DRAwIN" RECORDED AS DOCUMENT N0. FLAT FILE RWJ YORKVILLE,LLC SUB. moc No 111100011111,sloe I9z51 = 4, SEC 28, T 37 N, R 7 E, 3RD PM COUNTeYCIDE BE ER,UNIT s - Cll. us 34 J ]-PIPE �I STA 189+982.813 POC I'll 10,101 3KC0130TE. -Z°07'0O" POP 3NG0131.POC 31C0131TE. 5.530 m BOB 3KC0132.POC 31C0132TE, L=3492.158 m POC 3KC0133 =250.953 m E=2.255 m PC STA 109+85].203 C BLDG PT STA 190+108.236 AMOCO 3KC0130 3KC0131 3KC0132 0 Is CAR o WASH 01 LOT 12 / ICI YI - n `1 3KC0133 II BE IV �I I -_--------__-- I II TA o 9oL B1.1g7 3KC0118 III i N TA 19+ 1 PDB 3KC0132TE 15 TEMPORARY 10 8 xl 23.000 m LT[15.46'] 000 mOL 151.2196 13 STA 190+181.]83 1 24000 m LT[68.90'] R=3 969.158 m Ill 383.10'] -�\ �0`190 0 36 y POB 3KC0132 1 t5.96'] 9 TA 190+133.019 +151.301 Q POB 3KCOt3 8 23,000 m L [75.46'1 21.0 pLT[68.92 68.90' 11 CHORD=S 8995'22"E STA 190E 10862036 OB 3KC0130 000 STA lm OL 19.00LR 68.689 m[225.39'] 4%b'Ie"W m .0' i BOB 3KC013OTE POB 3KC0011TE +JT JTJT JT J(7T JT IT IT]T TT 7T Tr JJ yTT 1J T(17 TT IT 7T 77 TT -TT--TT T!]T 1T 1T iT TT 77)T TT)T IT 7T J? 1T IT]T iT IT31T iT TT 1T ]T iT TT IT _- 1�18.126 m LT[59.91'] L � EXISTING-ROW L-I-N c g0 60 B`4 41[s LC=68.759 m W5.19] -------_---_-_�_ _ -__--' I-__-_41 BO 00001 III +OSL.6 2� LOT 13 CHORD=S 8415'23"E ---- IVY+ --------- ------------ a- - ql11.49.1 & LC=68.]59 m[225.59'] _ - - ��-_� I�-a===== Ill lu q------- --------- --- - -------- -------------------_ 7CHDRO- 131.52 +133,158 151.353 12� +181.83[59 14 4°4 S'W I TOO m0`0 7 9 11.9]3 m LT[39.- 12.984 m LT[40,96' 3 . m LT[19.68'] 18.165 601 1 146.126 m[5]30.06'] 96.10 m 1 68 +18 8 3 -P P 5.736 m[18,82'] POB 3KC0110TE O O. 5 18.1.51 31=N B9°92'20"W 12.023+m LT 139,45'1 5.]36 m 118.82'3 „W ----------------- --- o 8.9781 ____---__-_ �______---____-_ 11681 m LT[38.32'] ---------------------190+150 _ __ ___ > z 190+050 EXISTING Q US RTE 34 190+Jga.------- ___ -- --- ~` ----- --i--tea A _______ -- QBEARINBS B433'S2'•E-� -�'1_-_---_ ---__--_ N w----- ------------� ----ILLS -------------------- RTE--------------- ------------------- `------- PT STA 190+108.236 a135.129 R=3 504.036 m IN 996,16'1 +103.643 +135.121 1-PIPE L= m t --- CHORD=5 8-025'16"E 5 72°31'49"E6 +135.SB0 ROW�MKR ---- C=43.]581.[113.56'] - __-_--_-_ _-__--__--_- --- ------_-_ 11.304 m HT[31.09'1 L m --- ------ -----------------_� _--_ -_- -% _______ - -- $� ------------ e. °m 7- TRACT B LOT 5 I_p� �-- ----------------- ul al p------------------------------------------------- � �e �ai a w . ------ "/ - zz 7 1213.18'1 EXISTING ROW LINE P 0P06EO ROW LINE JJJ d� .0 0+12452.9 L=815 915 m[50.519 79.767 m[26470'1 1 V 152.49'1 LC=X105,393781[50,501 LOT 2 I VI LOT 6 `� - LOT 5 3KC0117 i _ �-----_- LOT 1 9� \��q YORK(DOC NO MARKETPLACE IDOL r 2002000059291 oTE PARCEL N0. PARCEL NO 131TE PARCEL NO COURSE BEARING N 013DISTANCE COURSE BEARI NG NO 13 015 T ANCE COURSE BEARING O 3DISTANCE COURSE BEARING DISTANCE COURSE BEARING 32015 DISTANCE POC-1 5 9ro5'21"W 55.054 m 180.62' POC-1 5 9ro5'21"W 55.059 m 180.62 POL-1 5 4°05'21"W 55.059 m 80.62' POC-1 5 4V5'2l"W 55.054 m 180.62' POC-11P001 5 4tl5'21"W 55.059 m 0.62' YORKVILLE MARKET SQUARE 1-zIPOS( N 953'sz 0.169 59.99' 1-2(PO81 N 89°53'52^ 4e.769 159,99• 1-u(P.BI N 51'52 16 9.99' 1-11(PO01 N 8453'sr'w ..416 9.99' 1(POBI-w 4ros'zl" z.a35 893. (DOC NO 200700029691.SLOT 18231 21P081-3 5 84°10'18"w 48.511 m 121.9-' 2(POBI-7 N 8453'52"W 24.189 m 81.31' 11(POBI-12 S 89%0'10'W CO.,32.811 m 99.22' 11(POBI-2 N 14°53'52"W 18.288 m 60.00' 4-12 N 8951'05'W 30,480 m 100.00• 3-9 5 i7°91'31"W 1.709 m 5.61' P=3,9]1.1581(11.390.26'] 12-3 S]]°41'31"W 19.069 m 62.56' 2-10 9%018"E 2,000 m 6.56' 12-11 9%018"E 2.811 m 9.22' 1-1 7-6 - m[14.69'] -4,479,[14.69'1 8.517 m IC-13 18.288 m ° -4.419 - ° _ 5-6 410'18"E 8.918 m 29,96' CHORD BRG N B451'39"W 2-Il(POBI S 0453'52"E 10.28E m 60.00' 13-IIIP001 5 910'18"W 2.000 R=3,411.1501[11.390.26'1 6-8 N 4%DRIB"E L000 m 6,56' 6-7 - - m R=3,969,i58m[11.383.70'] L m C-4,419 CHORD PRO 5 81 24.7"E 8-9 L=ORD G[1A 84 LC=4,5121[14.80'] 0 5 10 15 20 2r5 1-2(PO81 S 8453'52"E 24.189 m BL31' CHORD BRG S 8951'38"E PARCEL NO.3KC0132TE PARCEL NO.3KCD133 9-]0. 'S 4`53'52"E 24.152 m 81.21' OURS_ BEARING OIS TANCE COURSE BEARING DISTANCE CERTIFICATION OF SURVEY 10-.2iPOB1 S 410'18"W 2.000 m 6.56' OINKS_ S 4`05'21"W 53.054 m 1]4.06' POC-1(POE) 5 9`05'21"w 55.054 m 180,62' 151P001-1 S 45'21"w 2.000 m 656• 26.96• GRAPHIC SCALE IN METERS 1-11 N 845352 W 30.976 m 99.99' 1 16817 6 5 BO°41'18"E 90.103 m 131.51' NOTE:BEARINGS ARE BASED ON ILLINOIS STATE PLANE STATE OF ILLINOIS 11-13 N 410'18"E 2.000 m 6.56' 17-14 N 0931'05"W 48.167 m 158.03' CGORGINATE SYSTEM NAD 1983 EAST ZONE 13-151POB1 S 8g53'SC E 30,473 m RF(POBI 9`05'21"E 2.835 ILLINOIS DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTY OF KENDALL 1,TIMOTHY C.OUIGG,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LANG RIGHT OF WAY PLAT SURVEYOR OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,THAT THE SURVEY OF PROPOSED F.A.P. ,.OGC, AREAS SHOWN IN SQUARE METERS[SQUARE FEET] 326 II L.47)WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND THAT THE SURVEY ;•'`p_:' TEMPORARY ROUTE FAP 326 (IL 471 IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. PARCEL TOTAL TOTAL ROW THAT ALL MONUMENTS AND MARKS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE _ - - t NO OWNER HOLDING REQUIRED REMAINDER EASEMENT EASEMENT PURPOSE SECTION(SCS,13C,108.1091R POSITION SHOWN THEREON,AND ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE = Cps?:�oFA�' AREA COUNTY KENDALL RETRACED. - rtl ms,�" 3KCOI30 TOD M.OUY,at al 1.873 1 263 1 4610 m s s9 t DRIVE RECDNSTRUCTION,CURB . x, [2138" SFI. [2,831 S11. [1].330 SE1. [635 SF11 ONSIR0CTI0N&GRADING ryvILV�;.` 1,11 m± 109 m't ISO- NO m't 3I m?± DRIVE RECONSTCTION.CURB JOB° R-93-014-94 PROJECT- 3KC013t L.K.HERRON,LLC [11.998 SF1± IT, SF11 [10829 SF1± [396 SFI- CONSTRUCTION&GRADING SEC 28 T 37 N,R 7 E OF 3RD P.M. DATE: ITASCA BANK&TRUST CD. 11165.11 1679 m i 61 m S DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION.CURB ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER 3063 LICE'13 EXPIRES 3KC0132 TRUSTEE [10,998 SF11 E926 SFII 1I'L772 9F11 [657 BF11 CONSTRUCTION&GRADING STA 190+050.000 TO STA 190+230.000 1/30/08 0.385 m± 80 m''I 16,305 SURVEY BOOK NOS. 3KC0133 CHICAGO TITLE LANG TRUST COMPANY L191 894 S111 [061 SF1 [191.033 1F11 SCALE:1:250 SHEET N0. 35 OF 36 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 4 ARTICLE D. B-3 SERVICE BUSINESS DISTRICT 10-7D-1 : PERMITTED USES: All uses permitted in the B-2 district. Agricultural implement sales and service. Appliance - service only. Automotive sales and service. Boat sales. Building material sales. Business machine repair. Car wash without mechanical repair on the premises. Catering service. Drive-in restaurant. Electrical equipment sales. Feed and grain sales. Frozen food locker. Furniture repair and refinishing. Golf driving range. Greenhouse. Kennel. Miniature golf. Motorcycle sales and service. Nursery. Orchard. Park - commercial recreation. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 4 Plumbing supplies and fixture sales. Pump sales. Recreational vehicle sales and service. Skating rink. Sports arena. Taxicab garage. Tennis court - indoor. Trailer rental. Truck rental. Truck sales and service. Upholstery shop. Veterinary clinic. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. Ord. 1986-1, 1-9-1986; Ord. 1988-7, 4- 14-1988; Ord. 1995-19, 8-10-1995; Ord. 1998-21, 6-25-1998; Ord. 2005-58, 7-12-2005) 10-7D-2: SPECIAL USES: A. Allowed: All special uses permitted in the B-2 district. Amusement park. Boat launching ramp. Boat rental and storage. Daycare centers. Stadium. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 4 B. Prohibited: Off track betting (OTB) facility. (Ord. 2010-58, 12-14-2010) 10-7D-3: LOT AREA: No lot shall have an area less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet. (Ord. 1986-1, 1-9- 1986) 10-7D-4: YARD AREAS: No building shall be erected or enlarged unless the following yards are provided and maintained in connection with such building, structure or enlargement: A. Front Yard: A front yard of not less than fifty feet (50'). (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) B. Side Yards: 1. A minimum side yard shall be required between buildings within the B-3 district of twenty feet (20') between a building constructed thereon and the side lot line, except in any existing B-3 zoning district within the corporate boundaries where no minimum side yard shall be required between buildings, except where a side yard adjoins a street, wherein a minimum yard of not less than thirty feet (30') shall be required. 2. The zoning board of appeals may, upon application, grant a variance to any petitioner seeking to vary the side yard requirements in a B-3 district if the variance is sought for a parcel of real estate that is sought to be developed as a planned unit development because of the unique nature of the parcel or development sought thereon. (Ord. 1986 -1, 1-9-1986; amd. 1994 Code) C. Rear Yard: A rear yard of not less than twenty feet (20'). (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) D. Transitional Yards: Where a side or rear lot line coincides with a residential district zone, a yard of not less than thirty feet (30') shall be required. A transitional yard shall be maintained only when the adjoining residential district is zoned R-1 or R-2 one-family residential. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. Ord. 1987-1, 2-12-1987) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 4 of 4 E. Parking Lot Setback Requirements: 1. Arterial Roadways: When a parking lot located in the B-3 zoning district is located next to an arterial roadway, as defined in the city's comprehensive plan, a twenty foot (20') setback from the property line is required. 2. Nonarterial Roadways: When a parking lot located in the B-3 zoning district is located next to a nonarterial roadway, as defined in the city's comprehensive plan, a ten foot (10') setback from the property line is required. (Ord. 1998-32, 11-5-1998) 10-713-5: LOT COVERAGE: No more than fifty percent (50%) of the area of the zoning lot may be occupied by buildings and structures, including accessory buildings. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974) 10-7D-6: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: A. No building or structure shall be erected or altered to exceed a maximum height of six (6) stories or eighty feet (80'), whichever is lower. B. No building or structure shall be erected or altered to exceed a maximum height of three (3) stories or thirty five feet (35) within the "downtown area" as described by exhibit A, attached to the ordinance codified herein. (Ord. 2006-67, 8-8-2006) 10-7D-7: OFF STREET PARKING AND LOADING: All in accordance with regulations set forth in chapter 11 of this title. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28- 1974) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/21/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page I of 18 Chapter 11 SIGNS 8-11-1: PRINCIPLES: The provisions of this chapter recognize that: A. There is a significant relationship between the manner in which signs are displayed and public safety and the value, quality of life and economic stability of adjoining property and overall community. B. The reasonable display of signs is necessary as a public service and necessary to the conduct of competitive commerce and industry. C. Signs are a constant and very visible element of the public environment and as such should meet the same high standards of quality set for other forms of development in the community. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) 8-11-2: GENERAL PURPOSE: The regulation of signs by this chapter is intended to promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare by: A. Enhancing the economic condition of the city by promoting reasonable, orderly and effective use and display of signs. B. Enhancing the physical appearance of the city. C. Protecting the general public from damage and injury which might be caused by the faulty and uncontrolled and inappropriate construction and use of signs within the city. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 18 D. Protecting the public use of streets and rights of way by reducing advertising distractions that may increase traffic accidents and congestion. E. Preserving the value of private property by assuring the compatibility in design and scale of signs with adjacent properties and uses. Accordingly, it is deemed necessary and in the public interest to regulate signs. To this end, this chapter: A. Establishes minimum standards for the display of signs in direct relationship to the functional use of property and to the intensity of development as permitted within the zoning districts which are provided in this chapter. B. Regulates the size, location, height, installation and other pertinent features of new signs. C. Requires the removal of derelict signs and the amortization of nonconforming signs. D. Provides for the effective administration and enforcement of these regulations. (Ord. 2009 -31, 6-9-2009) 8-11-3: SCOPE: The regulations of this chapter shall govern and control the erection, enlargement, expansion, alteration, operation, maintenance, relocation and removal of all signs within the city and any sign not expressly permitted by these regulations shall be prohibited. The regulations of this chapter relate to the location of signs, by function and type, within zoning districts and shall be in addition to provisions of the city of Yorkville building code and the city of Yorkville electrical code. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) 8-11-4: DEFINITIONS: ANIMATED, FLASHING OR MOVING SIGN: Any sign that uses lights that flash or alternate or which include action or motion or the appearance of action or motion either physically or http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 18 electronically. AWNING, CANOPY OR MARQUEE SIGN: A sign that is mounted or painted on, or attached to, an awning, canopy or marquee that is otherwise permitted by this chapter. The construction materials and the manner of construction of all awnings, canopies and marquees shall be in accordance with the Yorkville building code. BANNER: Any sign made of vinyl, fabric, or similar material that is displayed on a pole or building. National, state or municipal flags, and official flags of any institution or business shall not be considered banners. BILLBOARD: A structure for the permanent display of off premises advertisement which directs attention to a business, commodity, service or entertainment conducted, sold, or offered at a location other than the lot on which the sign is located. For the purposes of this chapter, this definition does not include off premises sponsorship banners. BUSINESS SIGN: A sign which directs attention to a business or profession conducted, or to a commodity or service sold, offered or manufactured, or to an entertainment offered, on the premises where the sign is located or to which it is affixed. A business sign shall be a wall, canopy, awning, marquee, or window sign. COLD AIR INFLATABLE DEVICE: An inflatable device, without a frame, used as a portable sign for promotions, sales or special events. A cold air balloon shall be ground mounted. CONSTRUCTION SIGN: A sign erected on a lot on which construction is taking place, indicating the names of the architects, engineers, landscape architects, contractors, and similar artisans, and the owners, financial supporters, sponsors and similar persons or firms having a role or interest with respect to the structure or project. Said sign shall be erected only so long as construction is occurring on the lot. A construction sign shall be a wall or freestanding sign. FREESTANDING SIGN: Any sign supported by structures or supports that are placed on or anchored in the ground and that are independent from any building or other structure. GRAND OPENING TEMPORARY SIGN: A temporary sign used for the purpose of advertising a grand opening of a new business. A grand opening temporary sign may be a wall, marquee, canopy, awning, or freestanding sign. Promotions, anniversary sales, special sales, or going out of business sales do not apply. GROUND MOUNTED/MONUMENT SIGN: A sign that is supported on a base that is equal in width and depth to the frame of the sign itself. A ground mounted/monument sign must be constructed of materials to match the principal structure. IDENTIFICATION SIGN: A sign giving the name and address of a residential building, business, development, industry, or other building or establishment. Such signs may be wholly or partly devoted to a readily recognized symbol. An identification sign shall be a freestanding, wall, canopy, awning, or marquee sign. MENU BOARD SIGN: A sign at a remote location on a lot giving product and price information about products sold on the lot to motorists in a waiting vehicle. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 4 of 18 MESSAGE BOARD SIGN: A sign designed so that characters, letters or illustrations can be changed manually or electronically without altering the face or surface of the sign. Electronic message boards must have a minimum duration time of twenty four (24) hours and no transition effects. OFF PREMISES SPONSORSHIP BANNER: Temporary signs which display advertisement for sponsors of an event or facility, such as an athletic event or field, on the location where the sign is located. POLE SIGN: A freestanding sign supported by a column or columns whose total width is less than fifty percent (50%) of the sign face depth. PORTABLE SIGN: A movable sign, excluding trailer signs, that is not attached to a structure or affixed to the ground or surface upon which it is located. PROJECTING SIGN: A sign which in whole or in part is dependent upon the building for support and projects more than twelve inches (12") from such building, except for awning, canopy and marquee signs. REAL ESTATE SIGN: A sign indicating the sale, rental, lease, or development of the lot, a portion of the lot, or a building on the lot on which the sign is located. A real estate sign shall be a wall or freestanding sign. ROOF SIGN: A sign that is wholly dependent upon a building for support or mounted on the roof, which projects more than six inches (6") above the highest point of a building or roof to which it is attached. SANDWICH SIGN OR A-FRAME SIGN: A temporary, portable sign constructed of two (2) boards hinged together toward the top to permit the sign to stand when the bottom edges of the boards are spread; each side of which is no more than twelve (12) square feet. SNIPE SIGNS: A temporary or permanent nongovernmental sign in a public right of way which is tacked, nailed, posted, pasted, glazed or otherwise affixed to a pole, stake, fence, traffic sign, traffic control device, utility pole, tree or the ground. TEMPORARY SIGNS: Any sign, banner, pennant, streamer, or advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, light fabric, cardboard, wallboard, or other lightweight material. TRAILER SIGN: A sign mounted on a chassis with or without wheels. VEHICLE SIGN: Any vehicle primarily situated to serve as a sign rather than as transportation. An automobile, van, or truck displaying the name and/or other information regarding the related establishment used for normal business operation or for employee transportation is not a vehicle sign. WALL SIGN: A sign fastened to or painted on the wall of a building or structure in such a manner that the wall becomes the supporting structure for, or forms the background surface of, the sign and which does not project more than twelve inches (12") from such building or structure. WIND FEATHER (Also Known As WIND FLAG, TEARDROP BANNER AND BLADE): Fabric http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 5 of 18 or plastic attention getting devices supported by a single pole and having a tall, narrow orientation whose rotation is determined by the wind direction. WINDOW SIGN: A sign which is applied or attached to or located within three feet (3') of the interior of a window, which sign may be seen through the window from the exterior of the structure. (Ord. 2010-04, 1-12-2010; amd. Ord. 2010-18, 4-13-2010; Ord. 2010-25, 6-8- 2010) 8-11-5: SIGNS EXEMPT FROM THIS CHAPTER: Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as exempting the following signs from the building code or those portions of this code applicable to signs. The following signs are otherwise exempt from regulations of this chapter: A. Flags, symbols or crests of nations, states, cities or political, fraternal, religious or civic organizations. One logo flag of a business shall be permitted on a lot provided that it is flown with the American flag and shall not be larger than the American flag. B. Decorations customarily and commonly associated with a national, local or religious holiday, celebration or anniversary provided that such decorations shall not be displayed for more than sixty (60) consecutive days. C. Signs four (4) square feet or less in area and five feet (5') in height or less on private property regulating on premises traffic and parking. D. Bulletin boards, message boards, and similar devices no greater than thirty two (32) square feet in area, five feet (6) high and not in the vision triangle, used solely to give information about and accessory to a public, charitable, educational or religious institution located on the lot. E. Legal notices, identification, informational, directional, traffic or other sign erected or required by governmental authority. F. Memorial signs or tablets eight (8) square feet or less in area, containing the names of a building and the date of construction, when cut into any masonry surface so as to be part http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 6 of 18 of the building or when constructed of bronze or some other noncombustible material and permanently attached to a building. G. Nonilluminated window signs painted on or covering no more than fifty percent (50%) of the window area, excluding glass doors. H. Real estate signs four (4) square feet or less in area, provided that no more than one such sign shall be permitted in each yard abutting a street. Real estate signs shall be freestanding signs and set back a minimum of five feet (5) from any lot line and shall be five feet (5') or less in height and shall not be illuminated. I. Menu boards accessory to a restaurant drive-up window facility, provided such signs are thirty six (36) square feet or less in area. J. Signs used to identify the type of model home when used in conjunction with a developing residential subdivision. Each type of model home is allowed one sign not to exceed eight (8) square feet in area and five feet (5') in height. Such sign shall be located on the lot where the model home is located and shall be removed upon occupancy of the home for normal residential use. K. "No Trespassing", "Beware of Dog" and other similar warning signs four (4) square feet or less in area. L. Name and address plates which give only the name and address of the resident(s) of the building less than three (3) square feet on single- and two-family dwellings and five (5) square feet for multi-family dwellings. M. Garage sale, farm produce sale signs provided there is only one sign per lot and it is present only during the duration of the sale and is less than four (4) square feet in area. N. Building interior signage. O. Political signs. Signs sixteen (16) square feet or less in area and announcing candidates for political office or political issues, provided that such signs shall not be displayed more http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 7 of 18 than sixty (60) days before any election and shall be removed within five (5) days after said election. P. Construction signs under eight (8) square feet. Q. Window signs covering no more than sixty percent (60%) of the window area excluding glass doors. R. Permanent, nonflashing signs on vending machines, gas pumps, ice and propane storage units. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) 8-11-6: GENERAL PROVISIONS: A. Sign Area: The area of the sign face which is also the sign area of a wall sign or other sign with only one face shall be computed by means of the smallest square, rectangle, circle, triangle or combination thereof that will encompass the extreme limits of the writing representation, emblem or other display, together with any material or color forming an integral part of the background of the display or used to differentiate the sign from the backdrop or structure against which it is placed. It does not include any supporting framework, bracing or decorative fence or wall when such fence or wall otherwise meets zoning ordinance regulations and is clearly incidental to the display itself. A double faced sign shall count as a single sign. B. Sign Height: The height of a sign shall be computed as the distance from the grade of the centerline of the adjacent street to the top of the highest attached component of the sign. C. Yard Requirements: Except as otherwise provided, signs shall be located at least five feet (5) from any driveway and lot line. Furthermore, no sign shall be erected or located in a public right of way except as established by the authorized public entity responsible for the right of way. No sign having a height more than thirty inches (30") shall be located within that part of the yard or open area of a corner lot included within a triangular area of twenty five feet (25') from the point of intersection of two (2) street right of way lines forming such a corner lot. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 8 of 18 D. Illumination Of Signs: The illumination of all signs shall be diffused or indirect and shall be so arranged that there will be no direct or reflecting rays into the public way or any lot on the perimeter of the premises on which the sign is located. Exposed light bulbs, neon tubing, flashing, blinking, traveling and similar illumination, including illuminated canopies are not permitted. Illuminated signs permitted in or adjacent to residential areas shall not be illuminated between the hours of eleven o'clock (11:00) P.M. and five o'clock (5:00) A.M. unless the use to which the sign pertains is open. E. Sign Maintenance: The owner of a sign and the owner of the premises on which the sign is located shall be jointly and severally liable to maintain such sign or signs subject to the following standards: 1. Signs shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition and good working order, including illumination sources, at all times. 2. Signs shall be properly painted unless galvanized or otherwise treated to prevent rust or deterioration. 3. Signs shall conform to maintenance provisions of the building and electrical codes as adopted by the city of Yorkville. F. Abandoned Signs: Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, any temporary sign installed for a period of thirty (30) days or more, or any sign which pertains to a time, event, or purpose which no longer applies, shall be removed. Permanent signs applicable to a business because of change in ownership or management of such business shall be deemed abandoned if the property remains vacant for a period of six (6) months or more. An abandoned sign is prohibited and shall be removed by the owner of the sign or owner of the premises within thirty (30) days. G. Removal Of Signs: Any sign found to be improperly maintained, abandoned or otherwise in violation of this chapter which is not removed or repaired within thirty (30) days of written notice of the code official may be removed by the code official. Any expense incidental to such removal or repair shall be charged to the owner of the property upon which the sign is located and shall constitute a lien upon the property. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9 -2009) 8-11-7: PROHIBITED SIGNS: The following signs shall not be permitted: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 9 of 18 A. Moving, animated and flashing signs, except electronic message boards. B. Roof signs. C. Vehicle signs. D. Signs which constitute a hazard to public health or safety. E. Signs which obstruct ingress or egress from any fire escape, door, window, or other exit or entrance. F. Signs which, by reason of size, location, content, color, or manner of illumination, obstruct the vision of motorists or interfere with the visibility or effectiveness of any traffic sign or control device on public streets. G. Signs which make use of words such as "stop", "look", "one-way", "danger", "yield" or any similar word, phrase, symbol or light so as to interfere with or confuse pedestrian or vehicular traffic. H. Billboards. I. Trailer signs, except directional or informational signs exempted by subsection 8-11-5E of this chapter. J. Searchlights, except searchlights for grand openings and special civic events. K. Snipe signs. L. Signs displaying obscene or indecent matter. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 10 of 18 M. Moving, rotating or animated signs except traditional barber poles not exceeding two feet (2') in height and projecting not more than twelve inches (12") from the building utilized only to identify a haircutting establishment. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) 8-11-8: PERMITTED SIGNS; AGRICULTURAL, FLOOD ZONE AND RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS: A. Permanent Signs: 1. Freestanding Identification Or Business Signs: All nonresidential uses in the agricultural, flood zone and residential zoning districts may have one freestanding business or identification sign. Nonresidential uses in the agricultural, flood zone and residential zoning districts on a corner lot with entrances on both streets may have one freestanding sign on each street frontage. Said sign shall be thirty two (32) square feet or less in area, five feet (5) or less in height and set back at least ten feet (10') from the street or entrance drive. Freestanding signs must be constructed with the base and supporting columns, if present, constructed of the same brick, stone or masonry material that the exterior walls of the principal building are made of. The sign panel containing the type and the type must match the color and type used on any wall mounted signage. No more than fifty percent (50%) of the freestanding sign area may be composed of a message board sign. 2. Building Mounted Identification Or Business Signs: All nonresidential uses in the agricultural, flood zone or residential zoning districts shall be permitted to have identification or business signage for each exterior wall of that part of the building facing a public right of way. No more than fifty percent (50%) of the building mounted sign area may be composed of a message board sign. Building mounted signage cannot extend more than seventy five percent (75%) of the building facade of the building to which it is attached. 3. Subdivision And Residential Complex Identification Signs: Two (2) permanent subdivision or residential complex identification signs, one on each side of the street, at primary entrances to a residential subdivision or complex containing no commercial advertising is permitted. Such signs shall be thirty two (32) square feet or less in area and eight feet (8') or less in height and constructed out of premium building materials such as brick or stone. For the purposes of this provision this sign may be installed in two (2) components, one on each side of the street. B. Temporary Signs: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 11 of 18 1. Real Estate Signs: On nonsingle-family residential lots, one real estate sign per street frontage no greater than thirty two (32) square feet in area or five feet (5') in height. 2. Residential Marketing Signs: Residential marketing signs at major entrances to residential subdivisions not to exceed one hundred (100) square feet and twelve feet (12') in height. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) 3. Off Site Marketing Signs: Residential off site marketing signs to call attention to and give directions to residential developments in Yorkville shall be allowed at no more than four (4) off site locations, and shall be no greater than one hundred (100) square feet in area and twelve feet (12') in height. Signs for a given development may be located in any zoning district provided that there is at least one-fourth (1/4) mile separation from the other off site marketing signs of that development and that no off site marketing sign be closer to a residence than one hundred feet (100'). Off site marketing signs for different developments must be at least two hundred fifty feet (250') from any other off site marketing sign. (Ord. 2010-04, 1-12-2010) 4. Grand Opening Signs: One grand opening sign not to exceed thirty two (32) square feet in area and eight feet (8') in height. 5. Construction Signs: One construction sign per nonsingle-family lot not to exceed thirty two (32) square feet in area and five feet (5') in height. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) 6. Off Premises Sponsorship Banner: Banners shall be on city property. Individual banners shall be mounted on an outfield fence, backstop or scoreboard. Banners mounted on an outfield fence shall be a dimension of three feet by six feet (3' x 6') in size and shall face the playing field. Banners mounted on a scoreboard or backstop shall be a maximum area of thirty two (32) square feet. (Ord. 2010-04, 1-12-2010) 8-11-9: PERMITTED SIGNS; BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICTS: A. Permanent Signs: 1. Freestanding Business Signs: On lots less than three (3) acres with one street frontage, one freestanding business sign thirty two (32) square feet or less feet in area and eight feet (8') or less in height shall be allowed. If the lot has more than one street frontage, one freestanding business sign thirty two (32) square feet or less in area and eight feet (8') or less in height per street frontage with an entrance/exit shall be allowed. On lots three (3) acres or larger with one street frontage, one freestanding business sign sixty four (64) square feet or less in area and eight feet (8') or less in height shall be allowed. If the lot has more than one street frontage, one freestanding business sign sixty four (64) square feet or less in area and eight feet (8') or less in height per street frontage with an entrance/exit shall be allowed. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 12 of 18 On lots three (3) acres or larger that have a street frontage(s) in excess of eight hundred feet (800') with two (2) entrances/exits at least six hundred feet (600') apart may have two (2) freestanding business signs sixty four (64) square feet or less in area and eight feet (8') or less in height on each street frontage. Freestanding signs must be constructed with the base and supporting columns, if present, constructed of the same brick, stone or masonry material that the exterior walls of the principal building are made of. The sign panel color and type must match the color and type used on any wall mounted signage. No more than fifty percent (50%) of the freestanding sign area may be composed of a message board sign. (Ord. 2010-04, 1-12-2010) 2. Building Mounted Business/Identification Signs: a. Single Use Building: A business having a public entrance in an exterior building wall or having an exterior wall facing a public right of way shall be permitted to have building mounted identification signage or building mounted business signage for each exterior wall of that part of the building in which it is located, provided said wall contains a public entrance or faces a public right of way. The maximum area of such sign shall not exceed two (2) square feet for each one linear foot of the facade of the building with a public entrance. No wall sign shall extend more than seventy five percent (75%) of the width of the building facade to which it is attached. b. Multi-Tenant Buildings: Each tenant having a public entrance in an exterior building wall or having an exterior wall facing a public right of way shall be permitted to have building mounted business or building mounted identification signage for each exterior wall of that part of the building in which it is located, provided said wall contains a public entrance. The maximum area of such sign(s) shall not exceed two (2) square feet in area for each one linear foot of the facade of that portion of the building of which the tenant or owner-occupant is in possession and to which the sign is attached. No wall sign shall extend more than seventy five percent (75%) of the width of that part of the building facade in which it is located. c. Message Board Sign Limitation: No more than fifty percent (50%) of the building mounted sign area may be composed of a message board sign. B. Temporary Signs: 1. Searchlights: Searchlights. 2. Cold Air Inflatable Devices: Cold air inflatable devices. 3. Grand Opening Signs: One grand opening sign not to exceed thirty two (32) square feet in area and eight feet (8') in height. 4. Commercial Real Estate Signs: On commercial lots, one real estate sign per street frontage no greater than thirty two (32) square feet in area and five feet (5') in height. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 13 of 18 5. Construction Signs: One construction sign per lot not to exceed thirty two (32) square feet in area and five feet (5) in height. 6. Wind Feathers: No limit on the quantity per lot. Time period not to exceed thirty (30) days. 7. Banners: One special business event sign per business not to exceed thirty two (32) square feet in area. 8. Portable Signs: One portable sign per business not to exceed sixteen (16) square feet in area. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) 9. Off Premises Sponsorship Banner: Banners shall be on city property. Individual banners shall be mounted on an outfield fence, backstop, or scoreboard. Banners mounted on an outfield fence shall be a dimension of three feet by six feet (3' x 6') in size and shall face the playing field. Banners mounted on a scoreboard or backstop shall be a maximum area of thirty two (32) square feet. (Ord. 2010-04, 1-12-2010) 8-11-10: PERMITTED SIGNS; MANUFACTURING ZONING DISTRICTS: A. Permanent Signs: 1. Freestanding Business Sign: On lots less than three (3) acres or on lots that face a residentially zoned or used lot with one street frontage, one freestanding business sign shall be allowed. Said sign shall be thirty two (32) square feet or less in area and eight feet (8') or less in height. If the lot has more than one street frontage, one freestanding business sign thirty two (32) square feet or less in area and eight feet (8') or less in height per street frontage with an entrance/exit shall be allowed. On lots three (3) acres or larger with one street frontage, one freestanding business sign shall be allowed. Said sign shall be a maximum of sixty four (64) square feet or less in area and eight feet (8') or less in height shall be allowed. If the lot has more than one street frontage, one freestanding business sign sixty four (64) square feet or less in area and eight feet (8') or less in height per street frontage with an entrance/exit shall be allowed. On lots three (3) acres or larger that have a street frontage(s) in excess of eight hundred feet (800') with two (2) entrances/exits at least six hundred feet (600') apart may have two (2) freestanding business signs sixty four (64) square feet or less in area and eight feet (8') or less in height on each street frontage. Freestanding signs must be constructed with the base and supporting columns, if present, constructed of the same brick, stone or masonry material that the exterior walls of the principal building are made of. The sign panel containing the type and the type must match the color and type used on any wall mounted signage. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 14 of 18 No more than fifty percent (50%) of the freestanding sign area may be composed of a message board sign. 2. Building Mounted Business/Identification Signs: a. Single Use Building: A business having a public entrance in an exterior building wall or having an exterior wall facing a public right of way shall be permitted to have building mounted identification signage or building mounted business signage for each exterior wall of that part of the building in which it is located, provided said wall contains a public entrance or faces a public right of way. The maximum area of such sign shall be two (2) square feet or less in area for each one linear foot of the facade of the building with a public entrance. b. Multi-Tenant Buildings: Each tenant having a public entrance in an exterior building wall or having an exterior wall facing a public right of way shall be permitted to have building mounted identification signage or building mounted business signage for each exterior wall of that part of the building in which it is located, provided said wall contains a public entrance. The maximum area of such sign(s) shall be two (2) square feet or less in area for each one linear foot of the facade of that portion of the building of which the tenant or owner-occupant is in possession and to which the sign is attached. All business and identification signs shall be wall, awning, canopy or marquee signs. c. Message Board Sign Limitation: No more than fifty percent (50%) of the building mounted sign area may be composed of a message board sign. B. Temporary Signs: 1. Real Estate Signs: On industrial lots, one real estate sign per street frontage no greater than thirty two (32) square feet in area or five feet (5) in height. 2. Construction Signs: One construction sign per industrial lot not to exceed thirty two (32) square feet in area and ten feet (10') in height. 3. Banners/Special Business Event Sign: One banner/special business event sign per business not to exceed thirty two (32) square feet in area and ten feet (10') in height. 4. Portable Sign: One portable sign per business not to exceed sixteen (16) square feet in area. 5. Wind Feathers: No limit on the quantity per lot. Time period not to exceed thirty (30) days. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) 6. Off Premises Sponsorship Banner: Banners shall be on city property. Individual banners shall be mounted on an outfield fence, backstop or scoreboard. Banners mounted on an outfield fence shall be a dimension of three feet by six feet (3' x 6') in size and shall face the playing field. Banners mounted on a scoreboard shall be a maximum area of thirty two (32) square feet. (Ord. 2010-04, 1-12-2010) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 15 of 18 8-11-11 : NONCONFORMING SIGNS: A. Any sign for which a permit has been lawfully granted prior to the effective date of this or any subsequent amendment to the sign ordinance and which does not comply with the provisions of such amendment may nonetheless be completed in accordance with the approved plans, provided construction of the sign is started within ninety (90) days after the passage of the ordinance amendment and is completed within sixty (60) days after beginning construction. B. Whenever a nonconforming sign has been discontinued for a period of six (6) months, or whenever there is evidence of a clear intent on the part of the owner to abandon a nonconforming sign, such sign shall not, after being discontinued or abandoned, be reestablished and the sign hereafter shall be in conformity with the regulations of this chapter. C. Normal maintenance of a nonconforming sign is permitted, including necessary nonstructural repairs or incidental alterations which do not extend or intensify the nonconforming features of the sign. D. No structural alteration, enlargement or extension shall be made in a nonconforming sign except when the alteration will actually result in eliminating the nonconformance. E. If a nonconforming sign is damaged or destroyed by any means to the extent of fifty percent (50%) or more of the replacement value at the time, the sign can be rebuilt or used thereafter only for a conforming use and in compliance with the provisions of this chapter. In the event the damage or destruction is less than fifty percent (50%) of its replacement value based upon prevailing costs, the sign may then be restored to its original condition and the use may be continued which existed at the time of such partial destruction until the nonconforming sign is otherwise abated by the provisions of this chapter. In either event, a permit for restoration or repair must be applied for within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of damage or destruction, and be completed within sixty (60) days after beginning restoration or repair. F. Existing temporary signs shall expire at the termination date specified on the permit, but in no case later than six (6) months from the passage date hereof. New temporary signs shall be allowed only in conformance with the provisions contained in this chapter. Such signage must be removed by the close of business of the day the temporary sign permit expires. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 16 of 18 8-11-12: PERMITTING PROCEDURES: Permits for permanent and temporary signs: (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) A. Permit Required: No sign shall be erected, enlarged, expanded, altered or relocated unless the person proposing to erect, alter or move such sign shall obtain a permit from the code official. Such permit shall be issued only when the sign complies with all of the applicable provisions of this chapter. The fee for granting such a permit for signs shall be established by the city council. The schedule of fees for signs shall be posted in the city offices and may be amended only by the city council. A deposit of fifty dollars ($50.00) shall be required at the time of permit application for any temporary banner sign, which deposit shall be returned to the applicant upon removal of the temporary banner sign, unless the applicant is in violation of the provisions of this chapter. Routine sign maintenance, changing of parts designed for change, or changing the content of a sign in any manner which does not change the functional classification of the sign shall not, standing alone, be considered an alteration of the sign requiring the issuance of a permit, unless such change of parts or content relates to or is occasioned by a change in the ownership or nature of the activity to which the sign relates or which is conducted on the premises on which the sign is located. (Ord. 2010-25, 6-8-2010) B. Application For Permit: Any person desiring a permit for a permanent or temporary sign shall file a permit application which shall contain or have attached the following information: 1. A copy of plans and specifications showing the method of construction, illumination, if any, and support of such sign. Calculations showing the sign is designed for dead load and wind pressure in any direction in the amount required by other applicable laws and ordinances of the city may be required. 2. A plat of survey showing the location of the sign(s) on the lot and a drawing indicating the location of the sign(s) on any building or structure on the lot. 3. A sketch, drawn to scale, showing sign faces, exposed surface areas and the proposed message and design, accurately represented as to size, area, proportion and color. 4. The written consent of the owner(s) or agent of the building, structure, or land on which the sign is erected. 5. The name, address and phone number of the applicant. 6. The name of the person, firm, corporation or association erecting, altering or moving the sign. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9-2009) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 17 of 18 C. Temporary Sign Permit Frequency And Duration Per Business: Type Of Sign Maximum Duration Maximum Frequency Banners 30 days 5 times per year Sandwich board or A-frame 6 months Renewable Commercial real estate 6 months Renewable Industrial real estate 6 months Renewable Residential marketing 6 months Renewable Grand opening 45 days Once per business Cold air inflatable device 72 hours Once per year Searchlights 72 hours Once per year Wind feather (per property) 30 days ($25.00 fee) ] Renewable ($5.00 fee) Construction During active building permit issuance Off premises sponsorship banner 8 months: March through October (Ord. 2010-18, 4-13-2010; amd. Ord. 2010-25, 6-8-2010) 8-11-13: SIGN VARIATIONS: In addition to the procedures and standards listed in section 10-14-5 of this code regarding variations from the requirements, the zoning board of appeals shall also consider the following factors in hearing testimony and making decisions regarding sign variance requests: A. If the sign was erected legally with a sign permit. B. If there are any unique physical characteristics of the property. C. If there are limited available locations for signage on the property. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 18 of 18 D. The cost to the applicant of complying with the sign ordinance requirements. E. If the sign is on or faces a street with a forty (40) mile per hour or higher speed limit. F. If the sign is on a street with twenty thousand (20,000) or higher vehicle trips per day. G. If the sign would be blocked by existing or required landscaping. H. If it is a wall sign facing a public right of way without a public entrance. (Ord. 2009-31, 6-9 -2009) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 7/28/2011 Ordinance No. 2010--p AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE RELOCATION OF SPECIFIC SIGNS IMPACTED BY THE WIDENING OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 WHEREAS,the Illinois Department of Transportation("IDOT")has finalized plans and has proceeded with the acquisition of land necessary to widen and to reconstruct Illinois Route 47 and has requested that the City grant a variance for any commercial sign impacted as a part of this project to pennit relocation and reinstallation of signs which do not conform to current City Code requirements; and, WHEREAS,the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville understand that the widening project shall benefit the City but should not create a financial burden upon business owners; and, WHEREAS, IDOT has agreed to compensate all affected business owners for the relocation of each and every sign but shall not underwrite any costs which are associated with any changes in such signage as may be required to conform to current City Code requirements; and, WHEREAS,the Mayor and City Council have concluded that it is in the best interest of the business community to grant a variance to all signs affected by the Illinois Route 47 widening project as legal non-conforming signs where such is the case. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section L The following signs which shall be relocated at the sole cost of IDOT in order to pen-nit the widening of Illinois Route 47 are hereby granted a variance: • Kramer Law & Others—North of Colonial Pkwy, west side IL 47 • Smokey's Restaurant—West side of IL 47 at IL 126 • Yorkville Lions Club South of Van Emmon St, east side IL 47 • Bank Parking South of Van Emmon St, east side of IL 47 • Happy Hounds —West side of IL 47 across from Park St • Travel Services—North of Appletree Ct, west side IL 47 • Bella Tressa & Others—North of Appletree Ct, east side IL 47 • Aunt Martha Youth Service—North of Appletree Ct, east side IL 47 • Lo Destro Dentists—North of Appletree Ct, west side IL 47 • Jewel North of Landmark Dr • BP Gas &, AM/PM—NE corner of US 34 • Castle Bank NE corner of Center Pkwy • McDonalds — East of Center Pkwy, north side US 34 • BP Gas & AM/PM NE corner of IL 47 • Duy's Shoes— East of IL 47, north side US 34 • Grand Rental Station North of Garden St, east side IL 47 Section U. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. Passed by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois,this day o A.D. 2010. ROBYN SUTCLIFF GEORGE T. GILSON, JR. ARDEN JOE PLOCHER DIANE TEELING GARY GOLINSKI t�1� MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS WALLY WF.RDERICH APPROVED by me,as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County, Illinois,this day of J U)4L A.D. 2010. 'ZZAk Mayor Attevt: 0. Ci Cle k PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA 2011-01 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT Kathleen Herron, Petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting the following variations: (a) Vary the sign regulations contained in City Code Section 8-11-9-A-1 to permit the construction of an advertising sign in the business district with dimensions of 6 feet 6 inches by 6 feet 6 inches on each side to a height not to exceed 13 feet 6 inches from ground level. (b) Permit a temporary sign, not to exceed the dimensions set forth in Paragraph (a) above, throughout the entire period of the reconstruction of U.S. Route 34 (Veteran's Parkway) following the removal of the current sign by the Illinois Department of Transportation(City Code Section 8-11-9-B). (c) Vary the requirements of City Code Section 10-7-D-4-E-1 regarding parking lot setback in the business-zoned district from 20 feet from property line to 0 feet from property line. The real property consists of approximately 0.24 acres, and is located immediately north of Route 34, and just east of Route 47 (Bridge Street), Yorkville, Illinois. The property is commonly known as 9675 Route 34, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. The legal description is as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PARENT PARCEL That part of the North West 1/4 of Section 28, Township 37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the East right of way line of Illinois Route 47 with the center line of U.S. Route 34; thence South 83° 46' 47" East along the center line of U.S. Route 34, 378.21 feet for the point of beginning; thence North 4° 52' 00" East, parallel with the East right of way line of Illinois Route 47, 61.08 feet; thence North 5° 13' 00" East parallel with said East right of way line, 188.92 feet; thence South 83° 46' 47" East parallel with the center line of U.S. Route 34, 60 feet; thence South 5° 13' 00" West parallel with the East right of way line of Illinois Route 47, 188.93 feet; thence South 4° 52' 00" West 61.07 feet to the center line of U.S. Route 34; thence North 83° 46' 47" West along said center line, 60 feet to the point of beginning; (excepting there from that part of above described premises conveyed to the State of Illinois by a Deed recorded July 29, 1974 as document 74-3609) in the Township of Bristol, Kendall County, Illinois. NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the Zoning Board of Appeals for the United City of Yorkville will conduct a Public Hearing on said Variance requests on Wednesday, August 3, 2011 at 7 p.m. at the Yorkville Public Library, 902 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, 60560. The public hearing may be continued from time to time to dates certain without further notice being published. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. Any written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville City Clerk, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, and will be accepted up to the date of the public hearing. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. BETH WARREN City Clerk By: Lisa Pickering Deputy Clerk