The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet 2011 05-24-11 0 CITE United City of Yorkville EST, 1836 800 Game Farm Road = Yorkville' Illinois 60560 o �� ` H �o' Telephone: 630-553-4350 '<cE Fax: 630-553-7575 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, May 24, 2011 Call to Order: Pledge of Allegiance: Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV George Gilson, Jr. Jacquelyn Milschewski Marty Munns Rose Ann Spears Carlo Colosimo Larry Kot Chris Funkhouser Diane Teeling Establishment of Quorum: Amendments to Agenda: Presentations: 1. Blackberry Creek Watershed Plan Update 2. Glen D Palmer Dam Bypass and Marge Cline Whitewater Course Maintenance Obligations Public Hearings: Citizen Comments: Consent Agenda: 1. CC 2011-43 Minutes of City Council—April 12, 2011 2. CC 2011-44 Minutes of Special City Council—February 26, 2011 3. CC 2011-45 Bill Payments— $955,142.11 —approve bill payments in the amount of$955,142.11 4. PW 2011-26 Com2 Electronics Recycling Contract Renewal—authorize Mayor to execute 5. PW 2011-28 Water Department Reports for March &April 2011 6. PW 2011-36 Sunflower Estates Unit 3 —Warranty Punchlist—authorize the calling of Travelers Bond #B21867156M in the amount of$4,000.00 if the warranty punchlist work is not completed by June 10, 2011 7. PW 2011-37 Heartland Circle—Warranty Punchlist—authorize the calling ofAmerican Southern Insurance Company Bond#B98804-010285 in the mount of$4,000.00 if the warranty punchlist work is not completed by June 10, 2011 8. PW 2011-38 Game Farm Road/ Somonauk Street Project—ROW& Temporary Easement Acquisition (802 South Bridge Street) —authorize City Administrator to approve acquisition and payments for up to 27 parcel transactions, subject to available funding and for those acquisitions where the property owner accepts the original appraised value of the acquisition City Council Meeting Agenda May 24, 2011 Page 2 Consent Agenda (cont'd): 9. PW 2011-12 An Ordinance Prohibiting the Use of Groundwater as a Potable Water Supply by the Installation of Use of Potable Water Supply Wells or by Any Other Method—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 10. ADM 2011-20 Treasurer's Report for April 2011 Public Works Committee Report: 1. PW 2011-33 Cost of Maintaining Bike Trails Economic Development Committee Report: Public Safety Committee Report: Administration Committee Report: Park Board: Plan Commission: Zoning Board of Appeals: Mayor's Report: 1. CC 2011-46 Appointments to Boards and Commissions 2. CC 2011-47 Library Board—Annual Report 3. CC 2011-48 City Debt Obligations and Options 4. CC 2011-49 Subdivision Control Ordinance Text Amendment 5. CC 2011-36 Police Sergeants' Union Contract City Council Report: City Clerk's Report: City Treasurer's Report: Community and Liaison Report: Staff Report: Additional Business: Executive Session: 1. For the appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific employees of the public body or legal counsel for the public body, including hearing testimony on a complaint lodged against an employee of the public body or against legal counsel for the public body to determine its validity. 2. For collective negotiating matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees. Adjournment: City Council Meeting Agenda May 24, 2011 Page 3 COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------, :PUBLIC W RKS: June_21, 2011-6-00p. _-City_Hall Conference Rooni Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Gilson Public Works Park Board Committee: Alderman Teeling Engineering YBSD Committee: Alderman Kot Parks and Recreation Committee: Alderman Milschewski ]ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:- --June 7, 2011 -6:30 p.m.-City Hall Conference Room: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Munns Community Development Plan Commission Committee: Alderman Funkhouser Building Safety and Zoning Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp. Committee: Alderman Milschewski Kendall Co. Plan Commission Committee: Alderman Teeling -PUBLIC SAFETY: June 2, 2011 -6:30 p.m.-City Hall Conference Room= - ---------- -- -- ------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Colosimo Police Human Resource Comm. Committee: Alderman Spears School District Committee: Alderman Kot Committee: Alderman Funkhouser ADMINISTRATION:-June 10,2011 -6:00 p.m.-City Hall Conference Rooms Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Spears Finance Library Committee: Alderman Gilson Administration Committee: Alderman Colosimo Committee: Alderman Munns UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, May 24, 2011 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENTATIONS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Blackberry Creek Watershed Plan Update 2. Glen D Palmer Dam Bypass and Marge Cline Whitewater Course Maintenance Obligations ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONSENT AGENDA: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2011-43 Minutes of City Council—April 12, 2011 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CC 2011-44 Minutes of Special City Council—February 26, 2011 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CC 2011-45 Bill List ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. PW 2011-26 Com2 Electronics Recycling Contract Renewal ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. PW 2011-28 Water Department Reports for March &April 2011 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. PW 2011-36 Sunflower Estates Unit 3 —Warranty Punchlist ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. PW 2011-37 Heartland Circle—Warranty Punchlist ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. PW 2011-38 Game Farm Road/ Somonauk Street Project—ROW& Temporary Easement Acquisition ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. PW 2011-12 An Ordinance Prohibiting the Use of Groundwater as a Potable Water Supply by the Installation of Use of Potable Water Supply Wells or by Any Other Method ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. ADM 2011-20 Treasurer's Report for April 2011 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2011-33 Cost of Maintaining Bike Trails ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR'S REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2011-46 Appointments to Boards and Commissions ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CC 2011-47 Library Board—Annual Report ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CC 2011-48 City Debt Obligations and Options ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. CC 2011-49 Subdivision Control Ordinance Text Amendment ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. CC 2011-36 Police Sergeants' Union Contract ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPORTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 i o J a T Legal ❑ Presentation #1 Finance ❑ EST. 1 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ °^,Y �O Consultant ❑ Ken Call county ` ❑ <LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Blackberry Creek Watershed Plan Update Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Presentation from Tara Neff of the Conservation Foundation. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: None Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: 'I' lIC CONSERVATION FOUNDATION Watershed Planning \ in Blackberry Creek We Save Land. We Save Rivers. THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, What is a watershed? { ; The area of land that catches rain and snow and Rainfall drains into a stream, river, lake or groundwater. • Ho land i used in a b `r to How d S S d � Overland Flow watershed effects water 4r quality. " `�� ' . �� Filtration • The watershed has become the planning and management unit of choice L14 for many water resource issues. r: T 711 -� � °° � a wit y a• '� � `. ;y '�1. _ rr��_I..Q r s - AIL S�. +4r + ww 'W41 CMAP 4pb Ar THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, Issues of concern S1.r I I I I -�lx i 63 I I j i I� I JI 1 I 1 �j I M I I THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, sties Issues of concern 1004 i y ;r Spw �' ypg_r• � ''M, �� , �M J 7 a sue. owl ♦, ± z 70 THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, sties Issues of concern �I f i i .a l i — 7 a Alk AMA, * #'e 4 r�1 is r: 'M a -.-�� T �� ;Ar• �` •-� � � � .vt r � s y V �b�1�, u r a �:} � an �� , �,,i � Iw}`►'� � 'y� ia� �.�{„��', �� 1�'�� u "'�� ' � � � .q lr � %r��( � ,1 '� K' •-f' If r �i � 1 ' � ". ��d.ivy , •,,«`�`•�, +„ �� { '1' G �;^.. mop ♦ ,a ! r rC.7APi, THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, Watershed Planning: f; Involves local stakeholders, and facilitates partnerships to ' protect and improve the health of the watershed. • Addresses problems that go beyond political and geographical boundaries — problems that are often too costly and complex for just one. • Creates a useful plan with specific problems and solutions (so stakeholders can apply for grant money to implement proj ects). LIL THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, p lan . . e A watershed . Recommends voluntary methods to :.mss f; protect and enhance water quality. Develops an action plan for restorative . and preventative efforts. , • Addresses point and nonpolnt source , r pollution issues. • Focuses on a waterway and its tributaries. A watershed p lan is NOT . . . • a legally binding document a comprehensive plan • a means to designate land uses a zoning map M • a required part of local a land-use map comprehensive plans THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, sties Nine Elements of Watershed Plans i 1 . Identify and quantify causes and sources of ==r impairments. 2. Estimate expected load reductions following implementation. 3. Identify BMP's needed to achieve load reductions and critical areas. 4. Estimate needed financial and technical resources. 5. Provide a public information education component that is designed to change social behavior. = ` 6. Include a schedule for implementing BMPs 7. Identify and describe interim measurable milestones. 8. Establish criteria to determine if load reductions are TALpq©rF being achieved. L1 9. Provide a monitoring component to evaluate the � effectiveness of the implementation over time for criteria in number 8. THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, Regional Criteria • Develop a vision for watershed land use by evaluating the collection of local comprehensive plans and estimating the cumulative impact on future water quality. • Set target pollutant-load reductions for impaired waters taking into account both point- and nonpoint sources. • Consider groundwater protection from both water quality and water quantity perspectives. _ Am I.IN 11 lip ''rig • Compare municipal codes and ordinances with the US EPA developed Water Q ua - li tY Scorecard. THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, sties The Fox River Basin • Third-largest tributary to the a Illinois River. • Abundant recreational -- o opportunities and high quality natural resources attract Wisconsin population growth. v;5 • Segments found nonsupport Lake Michig for: primary contact, aquatic life, fish consumption, public - watersupply. Blackberry Creek Watershed J t a, • Urban development and �- M — agriculture contribute to `- impairments. LM 71 M I THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, stir Blackberry Creek Watershed Quality of Lower Fox River as Cam N3Hill._ Basin gives context for our 47 - E um _ :! watershed. Batavia � r n ville • 32 miles; 73 sq. miles No u • 56% agricultural • 25,374 population urora` 3a BWgB rOVe • Kane & Kendall Counties fas L X31 • Aurora, Elburn, Montgomery, North Aurora, Sugar Grove, O go Piano and Yorkville Yorkv,e THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, Blackberry Creek Watershed L�`u�Ii 1T:€_ke7 C I Previous Plans I BLACKBERRY CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN r �A Kane and Kendall Count€es,Illinois --- s September,1999 Volume I: i Management Plan 9� ` ad I � `xptrm'«r YLIC3 Blackberry Creek We2e11hed Resource Plen lg Commree `e��'�iMIE• Blackberry Creek Watershed M Management Plan - 1999 Blackberry Creek Watershed Alternative Futures Analysis 2003 THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, sties Blackberry Creek Watershed Conditions Fully supporting for aquatic life. • Not supporting for primary contact due to fecal coliform. • Not assessed for secondary contact, fish consumption, or aesthetic quality. • Flooding. t • Problem: poor water quality ' • Pollutants: Fecal coliform , J M chlorides • Stressors: low dissolved oxygen, lack of habitat THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, stir 01ALL190- Illinois Environmental Protection (IEPA), Bureau of Water, awarded a rant to the Chicago g Metropolitan g p Agency for Planning (CMAP) to complete the watershed plan through section 604(b) of the Clean Water Act. The Chicago Metropolitan Agency For Planning is the official regional planning organization for the northeastern Illinois counties of Cook, ll DuPa e, Kane, Kendall,g Chicago Metropolitan Y� Lake McHenry, Will. Agency for Planning Wl'e Save Land. Tie Save Rivers. THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, CMAP Contracted With: The Conservation Foundation (TCF) - A local not-for-profit land and watershed protection organization, established in 1972. TCF is providing planning coordination and technical assistance. The Fox River Ecosystem Partnership (FREP) - One of 41 partnerships of the R Illinois Department of Natural Resources' � tOSYSTEMPartners for Conservation Program, established in TNEFtSHIP M ME- 1996. FREP is providing outreach and education. Wl'e Save Land. Tie Save Rivers. .7b or THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, BBC Watershed Plan Timeline ,_M� Al j L�`u�Ii 1T:€_ke7 C i ii ' September 2010 Introductions/ Project purpose October 2010 Watershed Plan Goals and Objectives November 2010 Watershed Vision December 2010 Groundwater Protection January 2011 Ordinance Review Exercise s February 2011 Open Space/ Green Infrastructure Framework March 2011 Review of Plan Chapter 1/ Impairments/Ordinance Analyses April 2011 Review of Watershed Inventory Chapter/ FORTRAN (HSPF) pollutant-load model/Load-reduction targets THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, BBC Watershed Plan Timeline j I i w ' May 2011 Plan recommendations/ Project selection June 2011 Plan recommendations/ Project selection July 2011 Plan recommendations/Tech and financial assistance needs August 2011 Public education components September 2011 Monitoring and Assessment chapter October 2011 Implementation schedule/ Measurable milestone and successes November 2011 IEPA feedback/ M Finalization of remaining issues December 2011 Final draft plan approval/ Next steps ,rL THE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION w, How can I be involved? S1.r • Participate in the planning process by attending monthly stakeholder meetings. • Provide input and a information Comprehensive Plans — Ordinances Maps • Adopt the completed plan and integrate its recommendations as appropriate. M To receive monthly meeting announcements, or if you have questions, please contact Tara Neff: 630-428-4500 x 23; tneff theconservationfoundation.or . C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal El II Presentation#2 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer ❑ u� City Administrator Tracking Number °°°°oysea, �p Police ❑ Kentlall County t Human Resources ❑ Public Works ❑ City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Glen D Palmer Dam Bypass and Marge Cline Whitewater Course Maintenance Obligations City Council/Committee Agenda Date: City Council—May 24, 2011 Synopsis: Presentation by staff on maintenance obligations. Intergovernmental agreement with the state is attached. Powerpoint presentation will be made at meeting. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/A Council Action Requested: Discussion Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Illin©is Department of Natural Resources Pat Quinn,Govemor One natural Resources Way Springfield.Illinois 62702-1271 Nfarc'vliller,Director I�iip;+r'dnr.statc.i.l.us July 1.7, 2009 Mr. Bark Olson United City of Yorkville 8001 Garne Fann Road Yorkville, Illinois 607560 Dear Mr. Olson: As a follow up to our meeting on July 14"', enclosed are two additional copies of the Operations and Maintenance Manual for the Glen Palmer Dana and Bypass Channel. This manual also includes a fully executed copy of the Agreement between the city of Yorkville and the Department of Natural Resources/Office of Water Resources covering the implementation and operation of the Glen Palmer Dam Improvements Project. The Agreement incorporates existing state owned property lease terms, originally outlined in Intergovernmental Agency Agreement number 645A between the Department and the City of Yorkville. The new Agreement included in the Operation and Maintenance Manual updates and replaces that former lease document. Please familiarize yourself with the manual and call me at 217-782-91301 if you have any questions. Sin rely, L� Lo en A. Wob _,t. ., FM fe+ct Manager LAW:rc Enclosures Operation and Maintenance Manual Yorkville l Glen Palmer Darn Fox River Glass 2 Dam City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois August, 2005 (Updated March 29, 2007) OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL YORKVILLE/GLEN PALMER DAM YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS Table of Contents SECTION1: GENERAL....................................................................................... ..............1 SECTION 2: DEFINITIONS .................................... ............................................................3 SECTION 3: DAM INFORMATION..................................... ..............................................6 SECTION 4- OPERATION ACTIVITIES.............I.,.....................I.............................. .......11 SECTION 5: MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES.................................-.................................17 APPENDIX A: INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT#203 APPENDIX B : ESTIMATED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS APPENDIC C: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST APPENDIX D: SLIDE GATE MAINTENANCE APPENDIX E.- STOPLOG MAINTENANCE PLATES PLATE I -DAM AND BYPASS CHANNEL CONFIGURATION PLATE 2 -GENERAL CROSS SECTIONS PLATE 3 -DENIL FISHWAY PLAN AND PROFILE PLATE 4-DEWATERING BREACH LOCATION SECTION 1 GENERAL This operation and maintenance manual, (hereafter referred to as O&M manual), outlines objectives,proposed policies,responsibilities,and procedures for City of Yorkville personnel who are responsible for the management of the Yorkville/Glen Palmer Dam. REASONS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND DISSEMINATION OF THE O&M MANUAL The overall public interest is served by providing this document to serve as a basis for the safe and economical operation and maintenance of the dawn during both emergency and day-to-day conditions. Additionally, it is a requirement of all dam owners who have dams which fall under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (Rivers, Lakes and Streams Act, (615 ILLS 5) Paragraph 23a) to operate and maintain them safely. Part 3702.40 of the 17 Illinois Administrative Code,Chapter I entitled the"Construction and Maintenance of Dams" details that: "4)An applicant for a Class I or II Clam shall submit an operational plan specifying the method and schedule for the operation of the darn and the routine operating procedures to keep the dam in good working order, including an emergency warning plan." and "5) As a condition of each permit, the dam owner shall submit a maintenance plan detailing the procedures and schedules to be followed to maintain the dam and its appurtenances in a reasonable state of repair." As a dam owner, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of'Water Resources (IDNRIUWA)is responsible for the safety of the public and for maintaining the structures for both safety and economy. Through an Intergovernmental Agreement(Contract x#203)between the city of Yorkville and IDNWOWR, signed January 21, 2005, the city of Yorkville is responsible for operating and maintaining both Phase 1 and Phase 2 improvements to the dam and for accepting all liability associated with the operation of the dam. This agreement is included in Appendix A. GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES Yorkville City Council The City Council will annually provide sufficient funding to safely maintain and operate the dam. The estimated annual funding requirement as of the date of this plan is $ 42,000 at completion of Phase 2. Appendix B includes a detailed summary of operation and maintenance activities used to develop the cost estimates noted above. The City Council will 1 also provide sufficient authority to personnel within city government to assure the performance of critical functions during emergencies as outlined in the Emergency Action Plan. City of Yorkville, Public Works Department On behalf of the city of Yorkville, the Public Works Department is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the dam in accordance with the operation and maintenance manual,to ensure that the dam will serve the intended purpose. Maintenance will include,but not be limited to; keeping the area clear of all trash and debris,or any other matter that might tend to impede proper and free flow of water. All structures, including riffles, pools,trails, bridges and the divider island will be kept clean of any and all debris and will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. All dam signage will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. Grass covered areas will be mowed to a height of six inches or less at least twice each year. Can areas that cannot be mowed, measures will be taken at least annually to maintain the designated landscape plantings and eliminate unwanted woody growth larger than one-half inch in diameter. Any web camera installed in the vicinity of the dam will be operated and maintained.The city of'Yorkville will also keep all concrete and rock surfaces free of graffiti and unnecessary markings and maintain and repair all fencing and hand railing associated with the dam. Measures will also be taken as conditions require to correct any erosion problems associated with the dam. IDNR is responsible for operation and maintenance of the stream gage recording equipment at the dam site. City of Yorkville, Police Department The city of Yorkville Police Department will close any city roads impacted by, or potentially impacted by, an emergency at the dam. The city of Yorkville Police Department will secure the dam site to allow ESDA and other Emergency Action Plan (EAP) parties to assess the situation of the emergency at the dam and implement remedial measures at the darn, if necessary with out placing the public at further risk. Emergency Services and Disaster Agency Kendall County Emergency Services Disaster Agency (ESDA) The Director of Kendall County ESDA will be responsible for all decisions related to emergency actions in the EAP in consultation with the IDNR when possible. ESDA will evaluate the reported situation at the dam and determine the nature of the emergency in consultation with city of Yorkville Public Works Department and IDNR when possible. ESDA will initiate the EAP if necessary, and initiate any remedial action if appropriate. 2 SECTION 2 DEFMTIONS Abutment-That part of the valley side or concrete walls against which the dam is constructed. Right and left abutments are those on respective sides of an observer when viewed looking downstream. Appurtenant Works-The structures or machinery auxiliary to dams which are built to operate and maintain dams; such as outlet works, spillways, gates, valves, channels,etc. Boil-A stream of water discharging from the ground surface downstream of the darn carrying with it a volume of soil which is distributed around the hole formed by the discharging water. Berne-A horizontal step or bench in the sloping profile of an embankment darn. Breach - A break, gap, or opening (failure) in a dam which releases impoundment water. Concrete Block - An erosion protection method using interlocking concrete blocks, usually with openings that are filled with soil and grass, Core- A zone of material of low permeability in an earthen darn. Dam- A barrier built for impounding or diverting the flow of water. Dike(Levee)-An embankment or structure built alongside a river to prevent high water from flooding bordering land. Drain,Layer or Blanket-A layer of pervious material in a dam to facilitate the drainage of the embankment including such items as a toe drain, a weep hole, and a chimney drain. Drawdown - The resultant lowering of water surface level due to the controlled release of water from the impoundment. Embankment-bill material,usually earth or rock, placed with sloping sides. Earthen Dam -Any dam constructed of excavated natural materials. Emergency Action Plan (EAP) - A predetermined plan of action to be taken to reduce the potential for property damage and loss of lives. Failure- An incident resulting in the uncontrolled release of water from a dam. 3 Feature Boulders — granite boulders deliberately placed in certain areas for a number of reasons including hydraulic controls and their adjustment,whitewater features such as waves and eddys, habitat, and appearance. Freeboard-The vertical distance between a stated water level and the top of a darn. Gate or Valve -In general, a device in which a leaf or member is moved across the waterway to control or stop the flow. Groin -The junction of the upstream or downstream face of the dam with the valley wall. Grouted Boulders—granite boulders placed in the stream bed with grout between them at the bottom of their joints that are intended for flood and erosion control,diversion and river grade control, whitewater boating, and environmental purposes. Maintenance-The upkeep,involving labor and materials,necessary for efficient operation of dams and their appurtenant works. Operation-The administration,management,and performance needed to operate the dam and appurtenant works. Operation and Maintenance Inspection - Inspections conducted by the dam operator. These inspections are frequent visual "walk around"inspections of the dam surface and appurtenant works. Outlet-An opening through which water can freely discharge for a particular purpose from all impoundment. Overflow Entry Weir -- Weir located on the upstream divider island that allows additional river flaw into the challenge route.. Phreatic Surface -The upper surface of saturation in an embankment. Piping-The progressive development of internal erosion by seepage, appearing downstream as a hole or seam, discharging water that contains soil particles. Planted Riprap A layer of stone riprap mixed with topsoil and plantings. Riprap - A layer of large stones, broken rock or precast blocks placed in a random fashion usually on the upstream slope of an embankment dam,on a reservoir shore,or on the sides of a channel as a protection against current, wave and ice action. 4 Roller Compacted Concrete — Roller Compacted Concrete (RCQ consists of aggregate, Portland cement and water. RC+C is a stiff concrete mix that is placed with earthwork equipment. It does not contain dowels or steel reinforcement. Sill - Top of a concrete weir. The elevation at which water will just begin to flow over the weir. Silt/Sediment- Soil particles and debris in an in]poundmcnt. Slump/Slide Area - A portion of earth embankment which moves downslope, sometimes suddenly, often with cracks developing. Spillway System-A structure or structures over or through which flows are discharged.If the flow is controlled by gates, it is considered a controlled spillway. If the elevation of the spillway crest is the only control of the flows, it is considered an uncontrolled spillway. Emergency Spillway - A spillway designed to operate very infrequently, only during exceptionally large floods, usually constructed of materials expected to erode slowly. Principal Spillway - The main spillway which controls both normal and flood flows and is constructed of non-erodible materials. Auxiliary Spillway - A spillway which works in conjunction with the principal spillway to control flood flows and is constructed of non-erodible materials. Stepped Riprap (terraces)--riprap placed to create terraces or steps. Generally located in a 3 step formation just above the water level in key locations, Stilling Basin-A basin constructed to dissipate the energy of fast flowing water,such as from a spillway, and to protect the stream bed from erosion. Stop Logs—Adjustable concrete blocks placed in the bypass channel entry way. The blocks allow flexibility to adjust the opening to the channel. Toe of Embankment - The junction of the face of the dam with the ground surface in the floodplain upstream or downstream of the darn. Trash Rack - A structure of metal or concrete bars located in the waterway at an intake to prevent the entry of floating or submerged debris. Weep Drain—a perforated pipe to relieve pressure head. 5 SECTION 3 DAM INFORMATION The Glen D. Palmer Dam is located on the Fox River approximately 35.9 miles upstream of the confluence with the Illinois River. The dam is in the city of Yorkville 940 ft upstream of the Illinois Route 47 Bridge. The drainage area tributary to the dam is 1804 square miles. SIZE CLASSIFICATION With a maximum height of 12.5 feet and a maximum storage capacity of approximately 867 acre-feet, the dam is in the small size category. HAZARD CLASSIFICATION The Yorkville/Glen D. Palmer Dam is classified as a CLASS IL SIGNIFICANT HAZARD POTENTIAL dam because of the moderate probability that, in the event of a dam failure, lass of life and/or property damage downstream of the dam would occur. Illinois Route 47 bridge and the Bristol/Yorkville Sanitary District water treatment facility are both located less than a mile downstream of the dam. PURPOSE OF DAM Originally the dam was constructed near the location of a historic mill rake operation as part of a plan in late 1950's to provide commercial navigation on the Fox River through a system of lacks and dams. 'Today the dam provides the only recreational pool of water in Kendall County for boating and fishing. The dam includes: 1. An original earthen embankment dam behind concrete abutments constructed by the State Division of Waterways in 1960-61. Top of embankment (behind north abutment) is 40 feet wide at elevation 582.0. The earthen embankment is protected with revetment mat on the north end of the dam on 3 horizontal to 1 vertical slope. 2. An original concrete ogee crest spillway dam constructed by the State Division of Waterways in 1960-61. Plates 1, 2 and 3 show the current configuration of dam including a 400 foot section of the crest at elevation 575.08 that has been modified to include 4 steps approximately 1"-2" high by 5'-S" wide. 6 3. Bypass channel approximately 1000 feet long by 120 feet wide including 7 rapids and pools in series. Channel includes two routes, a moderate route and a challenge route. The upstream divider island will be constructed of a core of roller compacted concrete(RCC) to approximately elevation 576.0. There will be a proposed pedestrian path located on the island over the RCC. Gravel and sand fill will be placed over the RCC with riprap placed on top. Further upstream from the divider island a low flow entry weir will be constructed to allow flaw into the bypass channel. This will also be constricted of RCC with a concrete weir attached with a top elevation of 574.95 (approximately the same as the existing dam) 4. Divider island and new south dam abutment. At elevation 577.3, flow will overtop the island and flow from the pool upstream of the daze into the bypass channel. 5. A 5'x3"Box culvert(side chute) through the south abutment with a slide gate structure and trash rack on upstream (south)end of the box conveying water from the pool immediately downstream of the dam to the downstream end of the stepped spillway. 6. An access bridge from the south share to the divider island over the bypass channel including stairs from the north bridge abutment(south dam abutment) to the island. 7. A Denil fish ladder structure located immediately near the north dam abutment with a trash rack at the upstream (east)end of the structure (see Plate 1 and 3). & A 3' - 11" wide by 12" deep notch in the crest of the dam located near the north abutment for low flow water distribution. The hydraulic situation with regard to the Stoplog is complicated, but the operation is relatively simple and infrequently needed. The components that affect each ether include. • A Long Darn Overflow Weir that is not level and is in a situation that is submerged with flood. Since it is so Iong,it can easily take most of the river flow if the Stoplog is set wrong. • A Denil Fish Ladder, which is really a channel with a constricted narrow and deep opening. It has an unusual hydraulic performance characteristics give the opening and the "Denil" plates. • A North Darn Overflow Notch,which is intended to achieve a total north flow of 25 cfs. This notch is below the overflew to the Whitewater Bypass Overflow Weir. 7 • Entry Overflow Weir to the Whitew ater Bypass. This is also a long weir, set slightly lower than the Dam Crest. Its level is set at the intended 210 cfs river level. Its purpose is to maximize flaw to the Whitewater Bypass,so we don't have the situation that when the river flows increase that the recreational experience doesn't increase. The weir length replaces,in a sense,the dam crest length removed by-the construction of the bypass. The darn and this Entry Overflow Weir dominate the hydraulics and thus sustaining the pool level. The Stoplog provides adjustability and tuning. • The Hydraulic Controls That Control the Split in the UP, er Bypass between the Main and Challenge Route. These are largely established by the design of the grouted boulder entries to each route_ The crest of the Main Waterway will have a degree of adjustability by moving some rock. • The Stoplog,which is the only component in the system with significant adjustability. Pertinent data for the existing darn with proposed modifications, appurtenant works and reservoir is presented in Table 1. Table 1: Pertinent Data for Proposed Dam Drainage Area Square Miles 1804 Dam Type Earth Fill Elevation,Top of Dam(earthen) Feet-NGVD 5810 Height above Streambed(earthen) Feet 13.0 [Upstream Slope 3H:1V Downstream Slope 3H:1 V Length, Crest Feet 150(north) 125 (south) Ta Width Feet 40 Type Concrete Ogee Elevation,Top of Ogee Spillway l eet-NGVD 575.08 Height above Streambed (ogee) Feet 6 Upstream Slope Vertical Downstream Slope 0.74H:IV Length, Crest Feet 410 Top Width Feet 2.5 Streambed Elevation (downstream) Feet-NGVD 569 Tye Roller Compacted Concrete. Elevation,To2 of Divider Island Feet-NGVD 577.30 Height above Streambed (RCC) Feet Varies,4-6 Upstream Slope 4H:1V Downstream Sloe 3H:I V Length, Crest Feet 227 Top Width Feet 5 Streambed Elevation(downstream) Feet-NGVD Varies, 567-559 Reservoir Storage at Normal Pool Acre-Ft 288 Normal Pool Elevation Feet-NGVD 575.08 Length Miles 2.1 Surface Area Acres 99 Storage at top of dam(5$2.0) Acre-Ft 867 9 Principal Spillway Type Stepped downstream of Ogee Dewatering [ogee Spillway,Denil Fish Ladder, Siphons,Bypass Channel, and if necessary Open Cut in Northern Earthen Embankment portion of the dam. ,Entrance Overflow Lower Area North of Divider Island Allows flow to enter challenge Route Elevation,Top of Overflow Feet-NGVD 574.95 Height above Streambed Feet 4-5 Length, Crest Feet 125 Top Width Feet 4 Streambed Elevation (downstream) Feet-NGVD Varies,569-570 Stop Log Entry Elevation,Top of Overflow Feet-NGVD 572.9 Height above Streambed Feet 4-5 Length, Crest Feet 20 To Width Feet 5 Streambed Elevation (downstream) Feet-NGVD Varies, 569-570 Flow Augmentation Pipe 5'x3' Concrete Box Culvert Through For Use During Low Flow South Abutment Periods Note:NGVD =National Geodetic Vertical Datum, 1929 10 SECTION 4 OPERATION ACTTWITIES GENERAL As a state owned facility on a Public Body of Water,the Yorkville Glen D.Palmer Dam and appurtenant works (including the bypass channel) is intended for public use and recreation. Accordingly, public use of the bypass channel shall not be restricted except when necessary for inspection,maintenance,or emergency conditions. General operation of the bypass channel by the city of Yorkville will be conducted in accordance with the Intergovern mental Agreement(Contract#203) between the city of Yorkville and IDNRIOWR, signed January 21, 2005 and included in Appendix A. The operation of the Denil fish ladder is intended to be year-round with outages (i.e., flow blockage to fishway) occurring only for maintenance needs outlined below.The elevation of the fishway is set by the river stage and therefore will not require routine adjustment of flow. However, stop logs can be used to block flow to the fishway in order to perform any necessary maintenance or debris removal. Aluminum flow baffles are installed on surface mounted guides inside the fishway. The baffles are designed to dissipate energy and are required for normal operation. For maintenance and inspection, the baffles can be removed from the surface mounted guides.For temporary replacement of baffles, wooden replicas of the aluminum baffles can be fabricated while replacement baffles are secured. The Denil fish ladder structure will have a protective grating included at the surface of the structure. This grating will reduce the amount of debris that enters the fishway when the structure is submerged in water and will also reduce the risk of injury for persons trespassing and climbing on the structure. The fishway is not designed with the appropriate safety measures for visitor access but will be accessible for maintenance crews. The designers highly recommend the exclusion of unauthorized personnel on the proposed structure at all times.The structure will also have a"trash rack"located at the fish exit (water entrances) that will reduce some of the debris loading in the structure. During Iow flow conditions (pool elevation 575.03 or less); the slide gate on the 5'xT box culvert through the south abutment wall must be opened to prevent adverse environmental impacts below the dam. The top of the spillway is at elevation 575.0. Opening the gate on the box culvert when the pool level drops to elevation 575.03, will allow at least 50 cfs to pass from the bypass channel into the grouted riprap pool (bottom at elevation 568.5) located below the stepped spillway along the entire reach of the spillway. This operation is necessary to assure that "river bed wetness" below the dam closely replicates "river bed wetness" conditions below the dam prior to implementation of dam improvements when low flows were still uniformly distributed across the crest of the spillway. Opening the 11 gate on the 5'x3' box culvert will compromise boating conditions in the lower portion of the bypass channel_ Once the gate has been opened at a pool elevation of 575.03 (210 cfs), approximately 12 cfs will pass through the Denil structure, 13 cfs will pass through the notch in the dam crest near the north abutment, and 185 cfs will enter the bypass channel. Flows through the Denil fish ladder and the north notch in the crest are intended to provide at least 25 cfs to the northern section of the river and island. The gate on the 5'xT box culvert must remain open until river elevations in the pool above the dam exceed elevation 575.1 (0.1foot flow over the stepped spillway). As a Public Body of Water, the pool created by the Yorkville Glen D. Palmer Dam and appurtenant works (including the bypass channel) shall be maintained at or above elevation 574.5 when flows exceed a base flow of 210 cfs. Pool elevations below this elevation will only be permitted when river discharges drop below 210 cfs or when emergency dewatering of the pool is necessary as part of the Emergency Action Plan for the dam. EMERGENCY DEWATERING Dewatering the pool above the dam below elevation 574.5 feet will only be allowed when approved the IDNRC©WR. :base flow for the Fox River at'Yorkville is 210 cfs (7(310 low flows). The final dam configuration (with bypass channel), will pass 210 cfs at elevation 575.03 (top of dam spillway 575.17). At least 500 of the pool volume exists at or above elevation 573.01, the mid-point elevation of the pool_ If emergency dewatering of the pool above the dam becomes necessary, two options exist for the Illinois Department of Natural Resources/Office of Water Resources (IDNR/0WR) to dewater the run of river dam pool to elevation 573.01 while maintaining a continuous base[low of at least 210 cfs. These options include: 1. Using one or more of the IDNR/OWR pumps (up to 5 pumps and 19 cfs capacity), a 54"-diameter temporary siphon, or combination of equivalent smaller temporary siphons, will be started to dewater the pool to elevation 573.01. At this elevation a 54" siphon,or equivalent, is able to pass 212 cfs while the bypass channel and Denil fish ladder continue to pass an additional 20 cfs. In this case, no physical changes will be made to the final dam itself; or 2. If it becomes necessary to dewater the reservoir during emergency conditions when flows exceeded 212cfs as noted above, additional emergency spillway capacity can be added to the dam, through in-situ material, behind (north of) the existing north dam abutment and proposed Devil fish ladder. This potential future emergency spillway area is owned and controlled by 1DNR10WR. 12 DAM INSPECTIONS The inspection program includes two types of dam inspections. The first is regularly conducted by the city of Yorkville and is referred to as an Operation and Maintenance Inspection. The second type of inspection, referred to as the Engineering Inspection, is conducted by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, or a qualified engineering consulting firm approved by the city of Yorkville, (all engineering inspection reports must be signed and sealed by an Illinois registered Professional Engineer).. Operation and Maintenance Inspection: "Walk-around" inspections of the darn and appurtenant works are to be made by the city of Yorkville. During these inspections, a list of items observed (see Inspection Items below)and items to be maintained should be recorded. Photos and illustrations are useful when documenting inspected conditions at the dam. Frequency: "Walk-around" inspections of the dam and appurtenant works are to be made semi annually and during and after unusual events such as heavy rainfall or an earthquake. Inspection Items: At a minimum,during each inspection the following items should be noted in particular:. I. Water Level -Water level of the pool (headwater), tail water and bypass channel should be recorded at the time of the inspection. Maximum reservoir levels as a result of heavy rainfall should be recorded. 2. Divider Island-Walk the crest, abutments, groins, side slopes, and island toes at the waterline of the dam concentrating on surface erosion,seepage, cracks, settlements, slumps, slides, and animal burrows. 3. Earth Embankment (behind the north abutment) - Walk the crest, abutments,grains, side slopes, downstream toe and upstream toe or at the waterline of the dam concentrating on surface erosion, seepage, cracks, settlements, slumps, slides, and animal burrows. These are described as follows: Surface Erosion-Removal of vegetative cover by water action or pedestrian or vehicle usage forming deep ruts or gullies. Seepage - The passage of water through and/or underneath the earth embankment abutment and natural ground line or at the contact between the embankment and outlet works can be indicated by cattails or other wet environmental vegetation, erosion channelization, or slumping on the embankment face. 13 Cracks - Beep cracks usually indicate the movement of the dam and/or the foundation and can be in either the longitudinal(along the length of the dam)or transverse (across the dam) directions. Cracking can be an indicator of the beginning of slumps. Shallow cracks may develop during the summer when the surface soils of the embankment become severely dried and are usually of no concern in regard to the safety of the dam. Settlement - Settlement is indicated by depressions or low spots and can be signs of consolidation of the dam or foundation or the loss of material beneath the settlement area. Slumps/Slides-Slow or sudden movements of the earth embankment slope on either face toward the toe of the dam. If seepage indicates the presence of soil particles,or if deep cracks,settlement, slumps, or slides are noticed, a qualified engineer should be contacted rD immediately for consultation - see Emergency Action Plan. Animal Burrows - Animal burrows result in a loss of earth embankment material and can provide seepage paths for water through the embankment. Vegetation - Grass should be a thick vigorous growth to stabilize embankment soils and prevent erosion from occurring.Note the height of the grass;if greater than 1 foot,a mowing of the area should be scheduled before the next inspection.There should be NO trees on the earth embankment and NONE within a minimum of 20 feet of the embankment toes or concrete structures. 4. Stepped Spillway-Check for any debris or other obstructions trapped on the principal stepped spillway which may block or restrict the free flow of water. Check stepped spillway for the development of any rusty areas on the concrete, and seepage, cracking, breaking, or spalling of the concrete. 5. Trash Racks - Check to make sure that the trash racks are unobstructed, operating well, and allowing for the free flow of water. 5. Outlet Works -Check for any debris or other obstructions trapped on the.sill of the bypass channel inlet which may block or restrict the free flow of water. Check stepped spillway, the 50 low flow outlet culvert in the south abutment wall and the abutment walls for the development of any rusty areas on the concrete, and seepage,cracking,breaking,or spalling of the concrete. Check to make sure weep holes in the abutments are clear and operating properly. Check for any erosion occurring at the embankment/structure junction. 14 7. Concrete Black and Rip rap-Check to make sure that the blocks and rip rap are remaining in a uniform position. Freeze/thaw action or flow over the blocks or rip rap may tend to lift or fracture them,thus requiring replacement or leveling to maintain the necessary level of protection.No trees or woody vegetation should be growing through the blocks or rip rap. g. Gates - The gate and appurtenances controlling low flow through the 5'x3' box culvert in the south abutment wall should be checked to make sure it is in good operating condition. Thoroughly inspect the gate paying particular attention to the stem, stern guides, nuts and bolts. Note the number and location of missing nuts or bolts,if any, and the condition of the stem. The gate should be exercised at each inspection as a minimum and preferably four times a year. 9. Denit Fish Ladder-Activities include visual inspection to ensure flow to the fishway. Inspection of aluminum baffles, baffle guides and associated hardware to check for abnormal wear is necessary. Inspection of the trash rack at the fishway exit should also occur at this time. Removal of accumulated debris in the fishway entrance pool should occur once per year unless storm maintenance or routine maintenance indicates an abnormally high level of accumulation or debris. In general, annual maintenance should occur during the lower flaw summer months when fish passage is not expected to occur. Stop logs should be utilized to stop flow to the fishway and allow maintenance crews access to the fishway. 14. Railings - Check for damage, accumulated debris, operation of gates and locks,and adequacy of locations(this may change with time as people access Cop the area or development occurs in the area). 11. Stilling Basin - Check the floodplain downstream of the clam for a distance of at least 104 feet for signs of movement of stone in the stilling basin. Records: A log book of activities occurring at the dam is to be kept current by the Dam Operator.The log book should be reviewed during the Engineering inspection and may be helpful during budget preparations. This book should contain at least the following documentation: 1 Completed operation and maintenance inspection lists 2 Additional visual observations 3 A list of maintenance performed 4 A list of any unusual occurrences at the dam 5 A copy of the engineering inspection reports 15 Engineering Ins ection: The engineering inspection is to be conducted by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources(IDNRJOWR)or a qualified engineering consulting firm approved by IDNRIOWR and the city of Yorkville.The inspection will provide a thorough evaluation of the condition of the dam and appurtenances. Frequency: The Yorkville/Glen Palmer Dam is classified as a CLASS 11, SIGNIFICANT HAZARD POTENTIAL dam. Class 11 darns are to be inspected every three years. Inspection Items: The engineer will thoroughly inspect the items noted under Operation and Maintenance Inspection in addition to the following items: 3 Principal and Auxiliary Spillways—Check for signs of seepage,structural cracking or spalling of concrete,misalignment of pipe,joint separation or differential settlement; 3 A review of past inspections; 3 An analysis of all data and information gathered including that from an on-site inspection. Records: A Dam Inspection Report form shall be completed by the inspecting engineer and will be signed and sealed by an Illinois Registered Professional Engineer. This report will document problem areas and deficiencies;recommend remedial actions for problem areas; and establish time requirements for dealing with the problems. The original report will be retained in the city of Yorkville's Yorkville/Glen Palmer Dam file and a copy of the report will be submitted to the Illinois Department of Natural Resources,Office of Water Resources. REVIEW OF EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN The emergency action plan should be reviewed annually to assure that all contacts,addresses, telephone numbers, etc. are current, Changes to the plan should be made as appropriate but only with the concurrence of the Kendall County Emergency Services and Disaster Agency and of the Department of Natural Resources, Office.of Water Resources. Copies of any revisions should also be forwarded to all personnel that have the plan. 16 SECTION 5 MAINTENANCE.ACTIVITIES Proper maintenance will prolong the life of the dam and protect against deterioration. Timely repairs are a must after problem areas have been identified.General maintenance of the dam by the city of Yorkville will be conducted in accordance with this O&M plan and the Intergovernmental Agreement(Contract#203)between the city of Yorkville and 1DNR/OWR, signed January 21,2005 and included in Appendix A. The maintenance activities specified in the following sections are minimum requirements. NOTE:NO alterations or repairs to structural elements should be made without the assistance of a qualified engineer and the concurrence of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Office of Water Resources. Debris: Remove all trash, logs and other debris which may obstruct flow over the principal spillway,Denil fish ladder and the bypass channel. Concrete Block and Rip Rap: Replace or level blocks and rip rap as needed to provide adequate protection against erosion. Vegetation Control: A good grass cover on the embankment should be maintained by seeding, fertilizing and mulching areas which are refilled, barren, or thinly vegetated. Seeding mixtures used for maintenance reseeding shall result in a cover compatible with adjacent cover. The seeding mixture used at the time of the darn's construction was: Seed having the equivalent of a minimum of 80 percent pure, live seed. When the percentage of purity multiplied by the percentage germination gives a percentage of pure, live seed less than the SQ percent, the rate of seeding was increased proportionately. 17 Adjusted pounds per acre=Specified Pounds x 80 Actual Pure,Live Seed Percent Kentucky Blue Grass 60 pounds per acre Alta Fescue 40 pounds per acre Timothy 20 pounds per acre Perennial Rye Grass 20 pounds per acre Red Top 20 pounds per acre Total 160 pounds per acre Grassed areas such as the embankment,the emergency spillway,and areas beyond the embankment toes for a distance of at least-20 feet should be mowed at least twice annually and at any time the height of the grass exceeds 1 foot. All eroded areas should be filled and compacted,reseeded, fertilized and mulched to establish a thick erosion resistant cover. All trees and brush on the darn embankment should be removed to prevent development of a root system which could provide seepage paths. All brush and trees should be removed to a distance of approximately 20 feet beyond both tees of the dam. Animal Damage: Rodent holes should be filled with compacted clayey dirt and reseeded. If rodents become a nuisance, an effective rodent control program as approved by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources District Wildlife Biologist should be implemented. Buoys: Warning buoys for the dam and bypass facility must be maintained(repaired,painted, or replaced) as needed to provide appropriate public safety warnings. These buoys are to placed in the river in the original construction plan locations after the threat of ice on the river has pasted and before May 15`h of each year, Likewise the buoys are to be removed by November V each year. Concrete: After consultation with IDNRlGWR, spalled and cracked areas on concrete structures should be patched to guard against any further deterioration of the structure. Concrete construction joints should be filled with suitable joint filler such as a bituminous sealant to protect against weathering. Drains: All drains and weep holes should be kept open and functional by cleaning them of silt and debris. Painting: All metal work, fencing, railing, etc. should be properly prepared and repainted as necessary to protect against rusting. is Signs: All warning signs and staff gages must be maintained(repaired,painted,or replaced)as needed to provide appropriate public safety warnings. Mechanical Equipment: The foisting mechanism, stem and guides, wedges, nuts and bolts should be cleaned and lubricated at least two (2) times per year. (Refer to Appendix C for operation and maintenance of the slide gate.) Maintenance of the Denil Fish Ladder (fishway) Obstruction of flow or the accumulation of debris in the Denil fishway is anticipated and will require removal to ensure proper function for efficient fish passage during the months of peak passage which include March, April and May. In addition to this period, movement to over wintering habitat may also take place during late October and November of each year. The fishway should be free of debris that would impede passage or disrupt normal water flow during these time periods each year. The variable conditions of the river will coincide with the variable maintenance needs for the fishway. In general,maintenance needs may arise to straighten or replace baffles,trash racks or grating, repair or patch spalling concrete and/or general debris/sediment removal. For sediment removal in the baffled portion of the fishway,the baffles can be gently raised up from the floor along the baffle guide slot during normal operation to flush accumulated sediment from under each baffle.Workers should start at the head end (fish exit in headwater) and flush baffles in series towards the entrance pool in the tail water. For the entrance and exit pools, it will be necessary to place stop logs at the entrance and exit of both pools to stop water flow to the fishway. Once flow is stopped,city personnel can enter the fishway and manually scoop any accumulated debris from the fishway. Routine Maintenance (weekly to bi-weekly)-Activities include visual inspection to ensure flow to the fishway.Trash and associated debris should be removed to maintain channel design capacity. Additionally,removal of obstructions to flow or fish movement(e.g., downed trees, large debris, etc.) at the entrance and exit of fish ladder should also occur. Storm Maintenance—Activities include inspection of the fishway immediately following storm events to remove sediment,trash and associated debris common with increasing river stages. Similar to Routine Maintenance,removal of obstructions to flow at the entrance and exit of fish ladder should also occur. Annual Inspections —Activities include inspection of aluminum baffles,baffle guides and associated hardware to check for abnormal wear and inspection of water depths upstream of the fishway exit to detect a loss of volume in the fishway exit area of the river above the dam. Inspection of the trash rack at the fishway exit should also occur at this time. Bars of the trash rack should be straightened if necessary. Removal of accumulated debris in 19 the fishway entrance pool should occur once per year unless storm maintenance or routine maintenance indicates an abnormally high level of accumulation or debris.In general, annual maintenance should occur during the lower flow summer months when fish passage is not expected to occur. Step logs should be utilized to stop flaw to the fishway and allow maintenance crews access to the fishway. 20 APPENDIX A: LOCAL SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT 20 Illinois Department of Natural Resources Rod R. Blagojevich, Governor One Natural Resources Way• Springfield, Illinois 62702-1 27 1 Joel 'Brunsvold, Director M hfp:fldnr.state.il.us January 28, 2005 Honorable Arthur Prochaska Mayor, United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Dear Mayor Prochaska: Enclosed for your files is a frilly executed copy of the Agreement between the city of Yorkville and the Department of Natural Resources/Office of Water Resources covering the implementation of the Glen Palmer Darn Improvements Project. The Agreement also incorporates existing state owned property lease terms, currently outlined in Intergovernmental Agency Agreement number 645A between the Department and the City of Yorkville. This ne�� Agreement updates and replaces that farmer document. As a local sponsor for the project, the city will be responsible for acquiring and conveying to the state, all property rights needed to construct, operate, maintain, and mitigate the project; for relocating any utility conflicts; accepting liability for the project; for operating and maintaining the project, and for paying For all design and construction costs associated with any enhancements added to the project at the request of the city. If you have any questions in this matter,please call me at 217/782-9130, Sincerely, Loren A. Wobig, P.E. Project Manager Enclosure cc: Kelly Kramer, City Attorney Printed on recycled and recyclahle paper INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT between the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS and the STATE OF ILLINOIS/DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES for the GLEN PALMER DAM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND USE OF STATE OWNED PROPERTY Contract No. 203 9-01-04 THIS AGREEMENT is made among the United Cityof Yorkville, a Municipal Corporation, located in Kendall County, Illinois, hereinafter referred to as the"CITY,"and the State of Illinois, Department of Natural Resources, hereinafter referred to as the "DEPARTMENT," WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY and the DEPARTMENT are legal entities, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, having among their powers the authority to contract with one another to perform such undertakings as described herein under the "intergovernmental Cooperation Act," 5 ILCS 220/1 et. seq. (2002); and WHEREAS, the CITY requested the DEPARTMENT to investigate the Glen Palmer Dam site to diminish or remove the public safety concerns created by the existing spillway configuration which ultimately resulted in the development of the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the CITY recognizes the dam as a integral part of the CITY's history and economy and recognizes the dam as a recreational destination for local citizens, tourists, and sportsmen alike; and WHEREAS, the CITY, through prior resolution 2001-7 approved by the CITY on February 28, 2001, strongly urged the DEPARTMENT to preserve the existing dam in the CITY while making such safety enhancements that will protect persons from harm and create an ecologically safe passageway for fish and water craft to move both upstream and downstream of the dam without harm to the environment; and WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has developed improvements for the state owned Glen Palmer Dam which consists of: modifying a portion of the dam spillway with a 4-step concrete spillway and fish ladder, modifying the remainder of the dam spillway with a divider island and whitewater bypass channel/fish passage along the south bank of the river, appurtenances, and any environmental mitigation hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT", and WHEREAS, based on a document entitled 'Yorkville/Glen Palmer Dam Alternative Analysis and Preliminary Design -Decernber'2003," prepared by Teng and Associates for the DEPARTMENT and filed with the Illinois-General Assembly in summary farm, it has been determined that while the DEPARTMENT prefers the ecologically beneficial removal of the dam, the PROJECT satisfies the state's objectives for safety, ecological improvements and recreational developments while minimizing land rights necessary to improve public safety, and that the D EPARTMEN-E should proceed to implement the PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has jurisdiction over State property at the Yorkville Dam of the Fox River, located in Kendall County and known as Riverfront Bicentennial Park; and WHEREAS, the CITY currently operates Riverfront Bicentennial Park under Agreement Number 645A with the DEPARTMENT, dated April 25,1991 and revised January 15, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference, for open space, recreational purposes, and the operation of a 16-inch'water line across state owned property, including the Fox River; and WHEREAS, the CITY recognizes the PROJECT as an integral part of their further development of the Riverfront Bicentennial Park in the CITY; and WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has approved participation in the PROJECT to the extent allowed by its statutory authority under the "Des Plaines and Illinois Rivers Act," 615 ILCS 6013 (2002); and WHEREAS, the Illinois General Assembly has appropriated funds to the DEPARTMENT from the Capital Development Bond Fund under Public Act 93-0842, Article 93, Sections 105, that includes funds for this PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT has determined that the execution of this AGREEMENT is not subject to the signature requirements of the "State Finance Act," 30 ILCS 105/9.02 (2002). WHEREAS, under penalties of perjury, the CITY certifies that 36-6005169 is its correct Federal Taxpayer Identification Number and that the CITY is doing business as a government entity; and NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the benefits to be derived from the completion of the PROJECT, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to the following terms and conditions: A. SPECIAL CONDIT]IONS 1. The recitals set forth are incorporated by reference and mace a part hereof, the same constituting the factual basis for this transaction. 2. The PROJECT will be constructed by the DEPARTMENT in two stages, identified as STAGE 1 and STAGE 2 in this AGREEMENT. STAGE 1 will include that work necessary to modify the existing dam spillway with a four step spillway, fish ladder and to construct a temporary spillway in the vicinity of the future bypass channel. STAGE 2 will include that work necessary to remove the temporary spillway constructed in STAGE 1 and to construct a permanent divider island and bypass channel/fish passage along the south bank of the river including any landscaping and appurtenances necessary to complete the PROJECT. 3. STAGE 2 of the PROJECT will proceed based on the availability of funds, accepted design plans, permits and land rights necessary to complete the stage. In the event the CITY wishes to proceed with implementation of STAGE 2 of the PROJECT without DEPARTMENT funding, the DEPARTMENT agrees to cooperate in the exchange of existing PROJECT documents with the CITY to facilitate the CITY's efforts. 2. 4. The 2003 estimated cost of the two phased PROJECT is $6,840,000. The DEPARTMENT"s funding obligation will cease immediately without penalty or farther payment being required if in any fiscal year the Illinois General Assembly fails to appropriate or otherwise make available sufficient funds for the PROJECT. 5. The DEPARTMENT will not approve the award of a construction contract for STAGE 1 of the PROJECT until the CITY has adopted and furnished to the DEPARTMENT a proper resolution providing that sufficient CITY funding will be set aside,to adequately operate and maintain the PROJECT as defined herein. 6. The previous Agreement Number 645A entered into on April 25, 1991 and revised January 15, 1999 between the CITY and the DEPARTMENT is hereby declared null and void and is hereby replaced in total with the terms of this new AGREEMENT between the parties. 7. All provisions of this agreement will be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. B. This agreement may only be modified, assigned, supplemented, amended or terminated by mutual agreement, in writing, by the parties hereto. B. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1, The DEPARTMENT will prepare or cause to be prepared, the final design plans, specifications, operation and maintenance manual, and contract documents; advertise for bids; make the contract award; supervise the construction (resident engineering); and pay for all the construction costs associated with the PROJECT. The CITY will pay for all design and construction costs associated with any enhancements added to the PROJECT at the request of the CITY. The PROJECT may be constructed in phases as determined by the DEPARTMENT. 2. The DEPARTMENT will designate on the plans all designated boundaries of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, hereinafter referred to as "PROPERTY RIGHTS," required for the construction, environmental mitigation, operation and maintenance of the PROJECT. The DEPARTMENT will also designate, on the plans or in writing prior to the CITY commencing acquisition, the minimum title, right or interest required in each parcel of land to ensure the proper construction and future integrity of the PROJECT. 3. The DEPARTMENT will assume all responsibility for the structural repair and/or rehabilitation of the PROJECT after construction completion to ensure that it will serve the intended purpose for the life of the PROJECT. Any necessary work concerning concrete PROJECT features and any other PROJECT features related to the structural integrity of the PROJECT will be the responsibility of the DEPARTMENT. 4. The DEPARTMENT hereby grants to the CITY the right to eater upon any property rights held by the DEPARTMENT necessary for operation, maintenance inspection, and maintenance of the PROJECT as defined herein. 5. The DEPARTMENT will be responsible for obtaining all federal and state permits required to construct, operate, and maintain the PROJECT. All permits will be applied for in the DEPARTMENT`s name, The CITY will be responsible for obtaining any local permits required for the PROJECT. The DEPARTMENT will be responsible for all PROJECT inspections and reports associated with the issuance of a state Dam Safety permit. 3 Should the DEPARTMENT determine that a maintenance problem exists, a joint inspection will be scheduled and made by the CITY and the DEPARTMENT. Failure of the CITY to properly maintain the PROJECT as defined herein and as indicated by a written report of such inspection,will permit the DEPARTMENT, upon thirty(30) days written notice and continued failure of the CITY to perform the necessary maintenance work, to enter upon any of the PROJECT property rights and perform such maintenance work. In this instance, the CITY will reimburse the DEPARTMENT for any and all costs that maybe incurred by the DEPARTMENT In connection therewith. C. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 1. The CITY will review and comment in writing to the DEPARTMENT on the final design plans and specifications and on the operation and maintenance manual for the PROJECT prior to the DEPARTMENT advertising for construction bids. 2. The CITY, without cost to the (DEPARTMENT, will acquire and convey to the DEPARTMENT, title to all PROPERTY RIGHTS, not currently held by the DEPARTMENT required for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the PROJECT. All expenses associated with PROPERTY RIGHTS acquisition including title commitments, attorney fees, appraisal costs, plat preparation, recording costs and any other incidental expenses will be borne by the CITY. Prior to the DEPARTMENT advertising forbids, the CITY will furnish to the DEPARTMENT copies of the conveyance documents on all PROPERTY RIGHTS acquired for the construction, operation and maintenance of the PROJECT for review and approval by the DEPARTMENT. 3. The CITY, without cost to the DEPARTMENT, will acquire and convey to the DEPARTMENT, PROPERTY RIGHTS for any environmental mitigation required as a result of the construction of the PROJECT. All expenses associated with PROPERTY RIGHTS acquisition including title commitments, attorney fees, appraisal costs, plat preparation, recording casts and any other incidental expenses will be bome by the CITY. Prior to the DEPARTMENT advertising for bids, the CITY will furnish to the DEPARTMENT copies of the conveyance documents on all PROPERTY RIGHTS acquired for the mitigation of the PROJECT, if necessary, for review and approval by the DEPARTMENT. 4. The CITY hereby grants to the DEPARTMENT the right to enter upon any PROPERTY RIGHTS held by the CITY necessary for construction, construction inspection, operation, maintenance, maintenance inspection and in the event the provisions of Item Bpi herein are invoked by the DEPARTMENT for failure of the CITY to operate and maintain the PROJECT. CITY will permit the use of any CITY-owned streets or alleys by the DEPARTMENT or its assigns as necessary to construct, inspect, operate and maintain the PROJECT. 5. The CITY, without cost to the DEPARTMENT, will assume responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the PROJECT In accordance with the operation and maintenance manual, to ensure that the PROJECT will serve the intended purpose. Maintenance will include, but not be limited to, keeping the area clear of all trash and debris, or any other matter that might tend to impede proper and free flow of water. All structures, including riffles, pools, trails, bridges and the divider island will be kept clean of any and all debris and will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. All PROJECT signage will be maintained in a satisfactory condition. Grass covered areas will be mowed to a height of six inches or less at least twice each year. On areas that cannot be mowed, measures will be taken at least annually to maintain the designated landscape plantings and eliminate unwanted woody growth larger than one-half inch in diameter. The CITY will keep all concrete and rock surfaces free of graffiti and unnecessary markings and maintain and repair all fencing and handrailing associated with the PROJECT. 4 Measures will also be taken as conditions require to correct any erosion problems associated with the PROJECT. 6. The CITY will be responsible for expeditiously notifying the DEPARTMENT of any necessary PROJECT repair or rehabilitation conditions that exist related to substantial erosion or structural integrity of the PROJECT. 7. The CITY will be responsible for the operation and maintenance of all safety lighting, signage, water control gates, and buoy placement associated with the operation of the PROJECT, 8. The CITY, without cost to the DEPARTMENT, will be responsible for obtaining and providing the DEPARTMENT with copies of all local permits required for the construction of the PROJECT. The CITY will be responsible to abide by all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations during operation and maintenance of the PROJECT, and to satisfy all state environmental laws, regulations, and executive orders that apply because of state funds being used on the PROJECT. 9. The CITY, without cost to the DEPARTMENT, will be responsible for all utility alterations or relocations and for all fence removal and/or replacement required as a result of the PROJECT construction, including any utility and fence related work shown on the plans. Utilities include, but are not limited to, electrical, cable television, and communication lines and oil, gas, sewer, and water pipelines. 10. The CITY will maintain eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. The CITY will continue to adopt and enforce required ordinances satisfactory to the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the DEPARTMENT, relative to the regulation of development in floodplains under the jurisdiction and control of the CITY, 11. The CITY will hold and save the DEPARTMENT and any of its duly appointed agents and employees harmless against any loss, damage, cause of action, fin•.: or judgment, Including all costs connected therewith, such as attorney and witness fees, filing fees and any other expenses incidental thereto, that may be incurred by reason of personal injury, death, property damage, flood damage and any and all other claims or suits of whatsoever nature that might arise or result from or as a consequence of the design, location, construction, operation and maintenance of the PROJECT. The CITY will not be responsible to hold the DEPARTMENT harmless against any loss, damages, costs or expenses arising out of negligent acts or omissions by the DEPARTMENT or its agents or employees, D. TERMS OF LAND USE 1. PREMISES: The lands covered by this Agreement shall include: (1) three tracts, comprising the Yorkville Dam and the abutting properties on the North and South banks of the Fox River in Section 33, Township 37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian, known as TRACT A (north abutment area), TRACT B (south abutment area), and TRACT C (all The DEPARTMENT property situated between said TRACTS A and B and bounded by the extended East and West boundaries thereof), (2) all PROPERTY RIGHTS acquired by the CITY in the name of the DEPARTMENT required for the construction, operation and maintenance of the PROJECT, and (3) all improvements of these lands, including the PROJECT(all hereinafter the"PREMISES"), 2. USE OF PREMISES: The DEPARTMENT grants use of the PREMISES to the CITY, at no cost to the CITY, in consideration for the CITY's responsibilities defined herein. CITY 5 hereby agrees to use the PREMISES for open space and recreational purposes at no charge to the public and for the existing 16-inch water line and other appurtenant utilities only, in accordance with plans, specifications and operations and maintenance manual approved by both parties. The PREMISES shall not be used for the burning of refuse, deposition of debris or other material, or for any unsanitary or unhealthful purposes by the CiTY in the use or occupancy of the PREMISES. Any other uses of the PREMISES, and all plans in connection herewith, shall be subject to the prior written approval of the DEPARTMENT. An unauthorized or impermissible use of the PREMISES shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Agreement. 3. ALTERATIONS: The CITY shall in no way alter or modify any existing structure(s) located on the PREMISES, nor shall the CITY modify the land within the PREMISES, without the prior express written consent of the DEPARTMENT. If the CITY wishes to make any such alterations and/or modifications, the CITY shall first contact the DEPARTMENT's Division of Planning to ensure compliance with applicable statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, consultation requirements of the Illinois Endangered Species Protection Act, 520 ILCS 10/11, and the consultation, mitigation and compensation provisions of the Interagency Wetland Policy Act of 1989, 20 ILCS 53011-1 et seq., and with the State Agency Historic Resources Protection Act. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to mean that the DEPARTMENT shall be responsible for compliance with all applicable State or Federal statutes and regulations; that responsibility shall remain with the CITY. 4. MAINTENANCE: in consideration for the CITY's use of the PREMISES as defined in articles D-1 and D-2, the CITY agrees to perform all maintenance of the PREMISES, including litter control and vegetation management and all PROJECT maintenance as defined in Articles C-5, C-6, and C-7 of this Agreement. 5. OBSTRUCTION OF PREMISES. CITY shall do nothing that might interfere with the ability of the DEPARTMENT to inspect, maintain or improve the PREMISES or any portion thereof, including specifically but without limitation activities of the DEPARTMENT related to the operation of the dam and associated PROJECT. The CITY shall not, in any manner, obstruct the programs of the DEPARTMENT. It is understood and agreed that the DEPARTMENT reserves the right to require the CITY to remove, relocate or modify any structures, improvements or facilities upon, under or across the PREMISES, at the CITY°s sole expense, if the DEPARTMENT determines, in its sole discretion, that such actions are appropriate and necessary to preserve the integrity, character, function or use of the PREMISES. fi. RELEASE OF DAMAGES; The CITY will further hold and save the DEPARTMENT and any of its duly appointed agents and employees harmless against any loss, damage, cause of action, fine or judgment, including all costs connected therewith, such as attorney and witness fees, filing fees and any other expenses incidental thereto, that may be incurred by reason of personal injury, death, property damage, flood damage and any and all other claims or suits of whatsoever nature that might arise or result from or as a consequence of the use, operation and maintenance of the PREMISES. The CITY will not be responsible to hold the DEPARTMENT harmless against any loss, damages, costs or expenses arising out of negligent acts or omissions by the DEPARTMENT or its agents or employees. 7. LAWS AND REGULATIONS: The DEPARTMENT and the CITY shall comply with all applicable provisions of State and Federal constitutions, laws, regulations, orders and decrees, Including but not limited to those pertaining to unlawful discrimination and equal employment opportunity, including without limitation the Illinois Human Rights Act, the Public Works Employment DiscriminatiorTAct, the Civil Rights Act of 1954, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Article VI of the regulations of the Illinois Department of Human Rights, which are incorporated herein by reference, and all environmental and cultural heritage requirements, 6 8. NOTIFICATIONS: All official notices pertaining to this Agreement, excluding routine management communications but including, without limitation, communications pertaining to amendments or termination, shall be effective only if directed to the respective parties as fellows: for The DEPARTMENT: for CITY: Department of Natural Resources Mayor, City of Yorkville Concession and Lease Management 800 Game Fan-7 Road One Natural Resources Way Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271 (telephone 2.17-782-0179) (telephone 630-553-4372) or to such other points of contact as may be designated in writing from time to time by authorized representatives of the parties. Ali routine communications relating to management and operation of the PREMISES shall be directed as follows: Department of Natural Resources Yorkville City Engineer Office of Water Resources 610 Tower Lane One Natural Resources Way Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271 (telephone 217-782-0900) (telephone 630-553-4350) 9. INSPECTION AND REPAIRS: The DEPARTMENT makes no representations, warranties (expressed or implied) or assurances with respect to the condition of any improvements situated on the PREMISES or the PREMISES themselves. The CITY accepts the PREMISES and all improvements thereon "as is" in their present condition, and all future PROJECT improvements as designed, approved and constructed on the PREMISES, It is further understood and agreed that the CITY has sufficiently inspected the PREMISES, prior to the execution of this Agreement, mane an independent assessment of the environmental and other conditions of the PREMISES, and accepts the same in its present condition. Any environmental claims which may arise from the CITY's use shall be the sole responsibility of the CITY, who agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the DEPARTMENT thereon. 10. RESERVED RIGHTS: This Agreement is nonexclusive, and the DEPARTMENT reserves the right of ingress, egress and usage of the PREMISES, and the right to grant leases, permits, or rights-of-way in and to the PREMISES to the extent that they are not incompatible with the uses authorized herein. 11. PUBLIC 'SAFETY: Should it be determined by the DEPARTMENT that a particular use of the PREMISES by the CITY is, or will be, hazardous to the public or the property, the CITY , upon written notice by the DEPARTMENT, shall install safety devices or make modifications at the CITY's sole expense to render the PREMISES safe for, and compatible with, public use. In the event the CITY fails to instal) such safety devices or make required modifications within thirty(30) days, or, if such modifications cannot be completed within said 7 time frame, the CITY fails to begin working expeditiously to reader the PREMISES safe for the public, the DEPARTMENT may install such safety devices or make such modifications at the CITY's expense, and may declare the CITY to be in breach of this Agreement. 12. ENVIRONMENTAL: The CITY, except as otherwise herein provided, shall not alter or impede water flowage, apply chemicals, or disturb the terrain in any manner within the PREMISES without prior approval of the DEPARTMENT. 13. TERMINATION; The DEPARTMENT shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon giving the CITY ninety (90)days'written notice, The CITY agrees to surrender and restore the PREMISES, and remove all personal property therefrom, prior to the expiration of said notification period. If this Agreement is terminated under this provision, the CITY shall not be liable for CITY responsibilities defined in this Agreement beyond the date of vacating the PREMISES, It is further understood and agreed that the DEPARTMENT may terminate this Agreement if the CITY is in default or in breach of any of the terms of the Agreement, or in the event of the CITY 's bankruptcy or receivership. In such an event, the DEPARTMENT shall give the CITY a written notification of such breach or default, and the CITY shall have thirty X30) days to cure the same. If the CITY fails to cure or remedy the breach or default within said period of time, the DEPARTMENT shall have the right to declare this Agreement to be terminated, 'Upon such an occurrence, the CITY shall surrender the PREMISES to the DEPARTMENT subject to the provisions of Article D-14. Likewise, the CITY, with 90 days written notice, may terminate this Agreement if the DEPARTMENT is in breach of any of the terms of the Agreement. Upon such an occurrence, the CITY shall surrender the PREMISES to the DEPARTMENT subject to the provisions of Article D-14. 14. VACATING THE PREMISES; The CITY, immediately upon Agreement Termination, shall vacate the PREMISES and remove all property to which. the CITY holds proper title, except that the CITY shall not remove any property that is permanently attached to the PREMISES regardless of whether the CITY holds proper title except as authorized in writing by the DEPARTMENT. Should the CITY fail to remove or dispose of the CITY's property, the DEPARTMENT may consider such property abandoned and may claim proper title to such property or dispose of same at the CITY's expense. In addition, at the termination of this Agreement, the CITY shall quit and surrender the PREMISES, including real property 8 improvements, in a good state of repair, save ordinary wear and tear. The DEPARTMENT reserves the right to require the CITY to make such repairs and restorations as it may, in its sole discretion, deem necessary. 15. NONINTERFERENCE AND COOPERATION: The DEPARTMENT and CITY shall do nothing to interfere with or prejudice the others right or duty to recover damages or commence action against a third party, and shall furnish all reasonable assistance and cooperation in connection with any action against such third party, including without limitation assistance in the prosecution of suit. 16. DISCRIMINATION: The DEPARTMENT and the CITY shall not discriminate unlawfully on the 'basis of race, color, sex, national origin, age or handicap in admission to, or treatment or employment in, programs or activities. 17. CERTIFICATIONS: The CITY will complete the attached Certification Document marked ATTACHMENT A, which will be incorporated as part of this AGREEMENT. 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year written, and represent that the signatories below are duly authorized to execute this AGREEMENT on behalf of their respective bodies, and that the effective date of this AGREEMENT is the date approved and executed by the Director of the DEPARTMENT. STAVE OF 1LLINOIS RECOMMENDED: ?ate: D: f _ r Gary R. Clark, Director vold, Director Office of Water Resources t of Natural Resources APPROVED: Robert Mool, Legal Counsel UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ATTEST: APPROVED: Yorkville CITY Clerk Yorkville CITY Mayor Date; 10 lLLIN015 ATTACHMENT A 1i CERTIFICATIONS wLl �PARTMEHT pr NATURAL RESOURCES I. The Contractor certifies that it is not barred from being awarded a contract or subcontract under Section 50 of the Illinois Procurement Code(30 ILCS 500/50). II. The Contractor certifies that it has not been barred from contracting with a unit of State or local government as a result of a violation of Section 33-E3 or 33-E4 of the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5133E-3, 720 ILCS 5133E-4). III. The Contractor certifies that it is not in default on an educational loan as provided in Public Act 85-827 (5 ILCS 38511) (a partnership shall be considered barred if any partner is in default on an educational loan). IV. The Contractor is not prohibited from selling goods or services to the State of Illinois because it pays dues orfees on behalf of its employees or agents or subsidizes or otherwise reimburses them for payment of their dues or fees to any club which unlawfully discriminates(775 ILCS 2511). V. Under penalties of perjury, I certify that the name, taxpayer iidentificatiionl number, and legal status listed below are correct. Name: Taxpayer Identification Number: Social Security Account Number N o4 Federal Employer Identification Number (lf you are an individual,enter your name and SSAN as it appears on your Social Security Card. If completing this certification for a sole proprietorship, enter the owner's name followed by the name of the business and the owner's SSN. For all other entities, enter the name of the entity as used to apply fcr the entity's FEIN and the FEIN.) Legal Status(Check one): ❑ Individual Owner of Sole Proprietorship tKGovernmental Entity ❑ Partnership C] Nonresident alien individual ❑Tax-exempt hospital or extended care facility © Estate or legal trust 0 Corporation providing or billing D Foreign corporation,partnership, estate, or trust medical and/or health care services ❑ Other: ❑ Corporation NOT providing or billing medical and/or health care service V1. This certification is required by the Drug Free Workplace Act (30 ILCS 580/1)for contracts and grants effective January 1, 1992. The Drug Free Workplace Act requires that no grantee or Contractor shall receive a grant or be considered for the purposes,of being awarded a contract from the State for the procurement of any property or services unless that the grantee or Contractor will provide a drug free workplace and that individuals must not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance in the performance of the contract or grant, False certification or violation of the certification may result in sanctions including, but not limited to, suspension of contract or grant payments, termination of the contract or grant and debarment of contracting or grant opportunities with the State for at least one(1)year but not more than five (5)years. CONTRACTOR/GRANTEE:For the purpose of this certification,"grantee"or"contractor'means a corporation,partnership,or other entity with twenty-five(25) or more employees at the time of issuing the grant, or a department, division, or other unit thereof, directly responsible for the specific performance under a contract or grant of$5,000 or more from the State. _2- ATTACHMENT A The contractor/grantee certifies and agrees that it will provide a drug free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement: (1) Notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance, including cannabis,is prohibited in the grantee's or contractor's workplace, (2) Specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition. (3) Notifying the employee that, as a condition of employment on such contract or grant, the employee will: (A) abide by the terms of the statement; and (B) notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5)days after such conviction. (b) Establishing a drug free awareness program to inform employees about! (1) the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) the grantee's or contractor's policy of maintaining a drug free workplace; (3) any available drug counseling, rehabilitation,and employee assistance programs; (4) the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations, (c) Providing a copy of the statement required by subparagraph (a) to each employee engaged in the performance of the contract or grant and to post the statement in a prominent place in the workplace. (d) Notifying the contracting or granting agency within ten (10)days after receiving notice under part(B)of paragraph(3) of subsection (a)above from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. (e) Imposing a sanction on,or requiring the satisfactory particlpation in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program by, any employee who is so convicted as required by section 5 of the Drug Free Workplace Act.. (f) Assisting employees in selecting a course of action in the event drug counseling, treatment,and rehabilitation is required and indicating that a trained referral team is in place. (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug free workplace through implementation of the Drug Free Workplace Act. INDIVIDUALS. If Contractor is an individual,or an individual doing business in the form of a sole proprietorship,the individual certifies that the individual will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance in the performance of the contract. Contractor certifies that it will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance in the performance of the contract. This requirement applies to contracts of more than$5,000, VII. In compliance with the State and Federal Constitutions,the Illinois Human Rights Act,the U.S,Civil Rights Act,and Section 504 of the Federal Rehabilitation Act, the Department of Central Management Services does not unlawfully discriminate in employment, contracts, or any other activity. Contractor,its employees and subcontractors,agree not to commit unlawful discrimination and agree to comply with applicable provisions of the Illinois Human Rights Act,the Public Works Employment Discrimination Act, the U.S. Civil Rights Act and Section 544 of the Federal Rehabilitation Act, and rules applicable to each.The equal employment opportunity clause of the Department of human Rights' rules is specifically incorporated herein. The Americans with Disabilities Act(42 U.S.C, 12101 et seq.)and the regulations thereunder(28 CFR 35.130)(ADA)prohibit discrimination against persons with disabilities by the State, whether directly or through contractual arrangements, in the provision of any aid, benefit or service, As a condition of receiving this contract, the undersigned contractor certifies that services, programs and activities provided under this contract are and will continue to be in compliance with the ADA. -3- ATTACHMENT A VIII. Contractor certifies he/she has informed the director of the agency in writing if he/she was formerly employed by that agency and has received an early retirement incentive under Section 40 ILCS 5114-108.3 or 40 ILCS 5115-133.3 of the Illinois Pension Code.Contractor acknowledges and agrees that if such early retirement incentive was received,this contract is not valid unless the official executing the contract has made the appropriate filing with the Auditor General prior to execution. ,X_ RETENTION OF RECORDS: The Contractor or subcontractor shall maintain hoops and records relating to the performance of the contract or subcontract and necessary to support amounts charged to the State under the contract or subcontract.The books and records shall be maintained by the Contractor for a period of 3 years from the later of the date of final payment under the contract or completion of the contract and by the subcontractor for a period of 3 years from the Later of the date of final payment under the subcontractor completion of the subcontract. However,the 3-year period shall be extended for the duration of any audit in progress at the time of that period's expiration. Ali books and records shall be available for review and audit by the Auditor General and the purchasing agency. The Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with any audit conducted by the Auditor General and to provide full access to all relevant materials. Failure to maintain the books and records required by this Section shall establish a presumption in favor of the State for the recovery of any funds paid by the State under the contract for which required books and records are not available. (30 ILCS 500120-65). X. SEXUAL HARASSMENT: Pursuant to 775 ILCS 512-105(A)(4), contractor shall have written sexual harassment policies that shall include, at a minimum, the following information: (1) the illegality of sexual harassment; (ii) the definition of sexual harassment under State law;(iii)a description of sexual harassment,utilizing examples;(iv)the Contractor's internal complaint process including penalties; (v)the legal recourse, investigative and complaint process available through the Department of Human Rights and the Human Rights Commission; (vi)directions on how to contact the Department and Commission;and(vii) protection against retaliation as provided by Section 6-101 of the IIlinols Human Rights Act. A copy of the poll cies shall be provided to the Department upon request. XI. For contracts exceeding $10,000, the Contractor certifies that neither it nor any substantially-owned affiliated company is participating or shall participate in an international boycott in violation of the provisions of the U.S.Export Administration Actof 1979 or the regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce promulgated under that Act. X11. Contractor shall notify the Department's Ethics Officer if Contractor solicits or intends to solicit for employment any of the Department's employees during any,part of the procurement process or during the term of the contract. Xlil. WAGES OF LABORERS, MECHANICS AND OTHER WORKMEN. If applicable,the Contractor shall be required to observe and comply with provisions of the "Prevailing Wage Act," 820 ILCS 13011 et. seq,, which applies to the wages of laborers, mechanics and other workers employed in any public works. The Contractor or bidder certifies that it, or any affiliate, is not Marred from being awarded a contract under 30 ILCS 500. Section 50-11 prohibits a person from entering into a contract with a State agency if he knows or should know that he,or any affiliate,is delinquent in the payment of any debt to the State as defined by the Debt Collection Beard. Section 50-12 prohibits a person from entering into a contract with a State agency if he,or any affiliate,has failed to collect and remit Illinois Use Tax on all sales of tangible personal property into the State of Illinois in accordance with the provisions of the Illinois Use Tax Act. The Contractor further acknowledges that the contracting State agency may declare the contract null and void if this certification is false or if the Contractor, or any affiliate, is determined to be delinquent in the payment of any debt to the State during the term of the contract. XV. The Contractor certifies in accordance with Public Act 93-0307 that no foreign-made equipment,materials,or supplies furnished to the State under the contract have been produced in whole or in part by forced labor,convict labor,or indentured labor under penal sanction. XVI. The Contractor certifies in accordance with 30 ILCS 500150-10.5 that no officer, director, partner or managerial agent of the contracting business has been convicted of a felony under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or a Class 3 or Class 2 felony under the Illinois Securities Law of 1953, 815 ILCS 511 et seq.,for a period of five years prior to the date of the bid or contract. The Contractor acknowledges that the contracting agency shall declare the contract void if this certification is false. XVI1. The Contractor certifies this agreement is in compliance with the requirements of the Corporate Accountability for Tax Expenditure Act(PA 93-0552). XV111. The Contractor certifies in accordance with 30 ILCS 5417150-12 that the bidder or contractor is not barred from being awarded a contract under this Section, The Contractor acknowledges that the contracting agency may declare the contract void if this certification is false. -4- ATTACHMENT A The undersigned acknowledges and agrees that each of the certifications or amendments shall be incorporated into and made apart of the invitation forbids,request for proposals,agreement,contract,amendment,renewal or other similar document to which these certifications are attached. ATRACY©R: Tl<E: ff ^s r4 DHR Public Contract Numbers.. `Cl r -C. Approved by CNR Legal Counsel June 2003 as revised by Comptroller Accounting Bulletin 116 in January 2004 (')Department of Human Rights Public Contract Number. Each Contractor having 15 or more employees must have a current Public Contract number or have proof of 'having submitted a completed application for one. Application forms may be obtained by contacting the Department of Human Rights, Public Contracts Section,190 W.Randolph,I Ott Floor,Chicago, Illinois 60601 or calling 3121814-2431 (TDD 3121263-1579). In the space provided,show your Public Contract Number or,if not available, the date a completed application for the number was submitted to the Department of Human Rights.Contractors with less than 15 employees may indicate"not applicable". APPENDIX B: ANNUAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST ESTIMATE 21 Operation and Maintenance Costs for Yorkville Dam (Annual$} Activity Unit Cast Oty Cast Notes t} eration Clam Monthly Walk Arounds $240 13 $3,120$240/day=$201hr+$101hr benefits Engineering inspection $1,667 1 $1,667 Tri-Annual Cost divided by 3 Genii _ Annual Inspection $960 1 $960 2 person crew,_2 days Bi-Annual Inspection for Votume Upstream $480 1 $480 2 person crew,2 days,divided b y 2 Bypass Channel Engineering fns ection $1,667 1 $1,667 Tri-Annual Cost divided by 3 Monthly Walk Arounds $240 13 $3,120 $2401da $201hr+$101hr benefits Operate Sluice Gate $60 4 $240 2 hrs each time Operate Ga esllns ect $30 52 $1,580 1 hr each time,every week Maintenance Dam Minor Maintenance,Branch'Removal,Etc $480 12 $5,760 2 person crew,1 day per month Spalling Concrete,Larger Repairs $4,000 1 $4,000 1 Ma or Annual Concrete Repair Denil Spring,Fall Months Only,semi-monthly,112 Minor Maintenance,Branch Removal,Etc $240 12 $2,880 crew-day Spalfing Concrete,Larger Repairs $1,500 1 $1,500 1 Major Annual Concrete or Steel Repair Baffle Re lacement $1,000 1 $1,000$40,000 annualized over 40 yrs_ Stop Log Replacement $120 1 $120$600 every 5 yrs Bypass Channel Minor Maintenance,Branch Removal,Etc $480 16 $7,680 2 person crew,2 day per month,8 months/ r Spalling Concrete,Grouted Boulder,Larger Repairs $4,000 1 $4,000 1 Major Annual Concrete Repair Sluice Gate Maintenance $480 1 $480 2 person crew,1 day per ypar Sluice Gate Replacement $1,000 1 $1,000$20,000 annualized over 20 yrs Ga a Replacement $500 1 $500$10,000 annualized over 20 yrs Total Operation and Maintenance $41,233 APPENDIX B ESTIMATED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS PHASE 2 APPENDIX C: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST Dam Name : Date of Inspection 20_ Time of Inspection AM PM Name of Inspector: Reservoir Elevation ITEM NO YES IF YES Surface Cracks Contact IDNR- Office of Water Resources Slump or Slide on the upstream or downstream face Contact IDNR-Office of Water Resources Erosion from runoff, wave action or traffic Repair and stabilize Embankment, abutment or spillway seepage Contact IDNR - Office of Water Resources Seepage or flows of muddy water Contact IDNR- Office of Water Resources &ESDA Uneven settlement Contact IDNR-Office of Water Resources Uneven concrete blocks Level and stabilize Trees, brush or burrow holes an the embankment Remove trees and brush,fill holes Spillways or trash racks blocked Clear immediately Exposed metal is rusty Clean and paint Concrete deterioration or cracks Contact IDNR- Office of Water Resources Pipe joint separation Contact IDNR- Office of Water Resources Scour Contact IDNR-Office of Water Resources Vent pipe blocked If no flow over drop inlet, clear Height of grass inches If more than I foot, schedule mowing Comments C-1 OPERATION AND MAINENTANCE INSPECTION CHECKLIST (CON'T) ITEM NO YES IF YES Cracks or leafage at sills Contact IDNR Water Resources Pools contain debris Remove and dispose debris off-site Signs are obstructed or contain graffiti Maintain or replace sign Buoys are positioned incorrectly Reposition buoys to correct location Reposition boulders to original Boulders out of position location and stabilize Cracks on chutes Contact IDNR-Water Resources Comments: APPENDIX D: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF SLUICE GATE DESCRIPTION The gate is a Fabricated Slide Gate -- Self Contained type. The gate has a non rising stem, and is designed for seating and unseating heads of 10-feet. The gate is furnished with a T-wrench for operation, of sufficient length to permit operation from behind the pedestrian railing at the flow augmentation culvert. MAINTENANCE The maintenance on a sluice gate is minimal but very important. The gate, itself,requires no periodic maintenance or lubrication. It is critical that the operating stems be periodically cleaned and greased. Manufacturers recommend that sterns be cleaned and greased at least once every 6 months. Dirty grease or lack of grease will increase the operating force necessary to open or close the gate and will accelerate the wear in the stem nut. Manufacturers of sluice gates reconunend the following lubricants for this use: Lubriplate Lithium Base No. 630AA or AAA Texaco Mulit-Fax Heavy Duty No. 2 Conoco All Purpose Superlube Shell Alvania Igo. 1 or No. 2 EP Mobilox Grease No. 2 EP Valvoline'Val-Lith No_ 2 EP At least once a year, all grease fittings on manual floor stands should be lubricated with a small amount of heavy duty grease designed to remain pliable and not dry out over long periods and wide temperature ranges. For best results the floor stand should be greased when tieing operated. For the first three or four turns of the crank, grease should be applied to each fitting after each turn. This will insure adequate lubrication of all parts. Over lubrication is not possible. Manufacturers recommend the following lubricants for this application: Mobilgrease Special Mobilplex No. 45 The exposed non-operating surfaces of the gate, stem guides, and hoisting mechanism should be cleaned and painted as conditions require or permit. All machined corrosion resistant metal faces must be thoroughly protected during the cleaning and painting. OPERATION There isn't a sluice gate manufacturer who will guarantee a leak proof gate. AWWA Specifications maintain that leakage for a seating head gate should not exceed 0.1 gpm per foot of perimeter. For unseating head gates with heads of up to 20 ft., the specifications indicate that leakage should not exceed 0.2 gpm per foot of perimeter. As an example; a 24-inch diameter circular opening gate would have a circumference of 6.25 ft. If an unseating head gate operates under a head of 20 ft. the allowable leakage would a 1.26 gpm. That is, the gate could pass 1.26 gpm, without requiring adjustment. When there is excessive leakage through the gate seating surfaces, the wedges should be readjusted per the manufacturers instructions. These adjustments should not be attempted without adequate instruction,help, tools, replacement parts, and safety equipment. Sluice gates are designed and constructed to operate satisfactorily under the design operating conditions. Care should be taken in the operation of the gate to assure that the design operating conditions are not exceeded. If, in the operation of the gate, an obstruction is met, either in the opening or closing direction, the obstruction must be removed, before continuing the operation of the gate. Excessive force roust never be placed on the gate or the gate stern by the operator in an effort to move the further. Manual operators are designed so that the maximum pull on the crank need not exceed 40 pounds when the gates are open or closed against the specified operating head. If a problem arises in the operation of the gate, the operator should consult the Superintendent and a determination will be made as to the corrective action to be taken. Prior to opening a sluice gate, the following checklist activities should be performed.. 1) Gate, wedges, stem, stem guides and hoist mechanism inspected. 2) All sand, stones, and other debris cleaned from the top of the gate, wedges, and stem guides. 3) Stern and stem guides cleaned and lubricated. 4) Guides cleaned and lubricated. 5) Hoisting mechanism lubricated. When operating the gate, record the number of turns of the crank to open the gate. Repeat the number of turns to close the gate. After closure, check the gate for leakage. If leakage is "excessive" or greater than prior to opening, the wedges may need adjusting. Do not force the crank to attempt to close the gate. if any problems are encountered, the Superintendent should be notified immediately, APPENDIX E: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF STOPLOGS Purpose There are several purposes for the Stoplog. In summary,the Stoplog is the key to keeping the river bottom downstream of the dam wet,allowing fish to pass upstream,allow boaters to pass downstream,sustaining the recreational pool upstream of the dam,and otherwise maximizing flow to the whitewater bypass for people, recreation and the community. Details include: 1. The primary purpose of the Stoplog is to adjust the flow split during low flows between the Denil Fish Ladder and Dam"Notch"on the North side of the dam,and the Whitewater bypass and "Flow Augmentation Pipe" on the South side. The intended split at a total river flow of 210 cfs is 25 cfs to the North and 185 cfs to the South. This split is to be achieved while maintaining a water level upstream of the dam that is near the historic pool level. 2. The 25 cfs to the North will be split among the Denil Fish Ladder and the Dam Notch,which is to be maximized to the Denil. 3. The 185 cfs to the south is to result in approximately 50 cfs flawing to the"flow augmentation pipe" to beep the river wet below the dam, which means the whitewater bypass will start with 185 efs and reduce to 135 cfs as the flaw augmentation pipe diverts 50 cfs out of the bypass. 4_ There are two waterways in the Upper Whitewater Bypass, the "Main" and the "Challenge." The flow to these waterways splits immediately downstream of the Stoplog given limited space and hydraulic fall. Flow is to be maximized to the Main Waterway at low flows (the 185 cfs), yet at higher total river flows maximized to the challenge waterway,such that main waterway difficulty increases moderately with flow, while the challenge waterway experience greatly increases with flow. The Stoplog is intentionally submerged by the pool above the Main and Upper Challenge Waterway split. This also will create an entry wave and water profile conducive to good visibility and boating. But it complicates,unavoidably, the performance of the entry and Stoplog- Operation Frequent adjustment of the stop log settings are not necessary, Stop log settings reflect three basic situations including: 1. Initial and Normal Settin,. During construction, the performance ofthe Whitewater Bypass will be tuned and the flow split tested, and adjustments made to the primary setting of the Stoplog. A measured primary setting dimension and block configuration will be documented. The intended design setting is to achieve a center bottom opening of 20 feet. By knowing the blocks being used, and the dimension from the inside of the vault to the land side of the first block (or the dimension to the river side of the first block), the center opening will be known. Adjustments during construction should be minor. This setting will be determined implanted and tested by the Construction Contractor. Thereafter it shouldn't have to be changed,with the following exceptions. After the fallowing activities take places the blocks will need to be reset to this "normal" condition as part of Yorkville's responsibility and under IDNR's consultation. Adjustment of the stop logs by the city are only to be permitted with IDNR concurrence. 2. Major Maintenance and Adjustments. Typically, maintenance of boulder and rock lined Whitewater Bypasses is minimal. However, rock reiterates and can move. Maintenance could be necessary. 3. COMRetition and Special Events. For a variety of reasons, it may be desirable to temporarily increase flow in the Whitewater Bypass, such as special events during drought or major competitions. Some of the stoplog blacks can be removed and setting used that will achieve this. Adj Listing the stoplogs will require advanced approval from IDNR and the adjustment can not significantly lower the upstream pool. Maintenance and Operation Functions The normal operational requirements will include any large debris removal and inspection of the Stoplog condition. The most frequent maintenance of whitewater bypass is like most parks,debris,trash removal,and landscape maintenance. The stoplog blocks that are not being used will function as benches in the upper landing and along the path. When the Stoplog blocks are to be removed,set or adjusted,the procedure will be to mobilize a large track excavator, have him place or remove the blocks in the vault, and push/pull the blocks across the river. Each block weighs approximately 6,000 pounds. The purpose of the vault is to allow placement or removal of the blocks out of the main current of the waterway. The general procedure will be: l. Arrange for a contractor with an Excavator that handles large rock placement to do the work,or mobilize City Equipment. This has to be Track Excavators,not rubber tired backhoes. The same excavator can be used to make boulder and rock adjustments along the Whitewater Bypass. 2. Establish and review safety procedures,including for working around flowing water. Several experienced people will be necessary,and a boat to access the center island and Stoplog river side abutment from upstream. 3. Isolate the work area and sign the area to call forboaters to get out of the river.. 4. Mobilize the excavator. The operator should be skilled in rock and equipment placement in fairly tight quarters. 5. Remove the cover to the placement vault. Move aside any feature boulders that are downstream of the Stoplog. 6. The bottom of the blocks has a large,grove. The base sill has a matching large tongue which the block: slides along. The excavator operator pulls or pushes the block. The height of the tongue, depth of the groove, and weight of the black will prevent the block from being pushed downstream when it is in the current. 7. If placing or moving blocks,inspect the vault and slide any blocks in the vault out into the river. Make sure the bottom of the vault is clear of debris by use of a square bladed hand shovel. Attach appropriate chains or lifting cable to the block to be placed.. Lift the block and place into the vault. Remove the chains or cables and the operator will use the excavator bucket to push the block into the river. S. As the blocks are placed,inspect and make sure they are tight to the abutment or adjoining block. . With the final block placed,check the dimension between the land side of the interior wall of the vault and the last block and adjust setting as appropriate to "normal" or"desired" flow setting. 10. For removing or adjusting the opening to a wider setting,use the procedure in reverse. 11, Reset (push or pull) any feature boulders downstream of the Stoplog adjacent to the abutments. Depending upon the need, these will be used to adjust the flow pattern where water flows over the tall blocks. 12. Set any blocks removed as benches in designated locations above the path. 13. Replace the vault cover and cleanup. 14. Check for flow performance along the bypass and Denil Fish Ladder. t5. Demobilize YORKVILLE DAM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL EXHIBIT PLATES PLATE 1 - GENERAL PROJECT PLAN AND SOIL BORING LOCATIONS PLATE 2 - GENERAL CROSS SECTIONS PLATE 3 - DENIL FISHAY PLAN AND PROFILE PLATE 4- DAM AND BYPASS CONFIGURATION PLATES Plate 1 —Dam and Bypass Channel Configuration Plate 2 - General Cross Sections Plate 3 -Denil Fishway Plan and Profile STATE OF ILLINOIS YORKVILLE. DAM -MULTI-PURPOSE DAM PROJECT-PHASE 2-CANOE AND FISH BYPASS CHANNEL DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES KENDALL COUNTY OFFICE OF WATER RESOURCES f S0' loo, 1"- 40, LEGE f s A13 C-t DAM GORES WITH MIN, 5' ROCK CORE BELOW 01 SOIL BORINGS WITH 10' ROCK CORES Al SOIL BORINGS TO TOP OF BED ROCK Spld 0.nA[Nf 4 Tn Tgfz$�L0 10� ET-I EXPLORATORY TRENCHES F1 BRIDGE ABUTMENT BORING - SOIL AND 10' ROCK CORE 51 SOIL OREDGINGS SEDIMENT TESTING ti Bill of Nolerr'al Item Lieu Dfy 1 Ckudng Acres 0.10 Temporary Fence roof 24 o (rj 3 S-1 Free Remordl(6 to 15 EeWfs) ET-4 Tree Trunk Profeclian Ea 15 Sidawafk Remaro+ Sq.Ff. t64.i} LEGENDs pyl - Sedimaly Contra;Silt Fence rant x1510 � BORING ` Sediment Conlyd.SW Fence Noiahnanee foal 3474 ®ET EXPLORATION iRENC# 1 Erosion Cantrol Blanket Si,Yd. 5.555.6 0 CP ° CONTROL POINT W C Seeding,IAdthing and Fartifivag Acres 115 O BkI - BENCHMARK Pnrrtw,d ComeN Cancrela Sidewalk 5 dnch Sa Fl. A442.4 Ze a Fox 3� S-2 z 2 Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk 5 Inch � 4 CIL BYPASS STA 15+67.42 y Flow AugmentotGon Pipe C-1 N 1912459.423 1 E 954900.062 i 0 Portland Cement Concrete SldewaiK 5 Inca aj '°'r 1 CS T Stop Loo rr � ° Sediment Control, Silt Fence Ciearing 0,10 Acres - -_ - Temporary Fence l E� o ---------- - r _ _ m s - r - h 500.0 ft.--- N I Portono Cement Concrete SldawolK 5 I zh ar ti Ind C nt Concrete Sidewalk 5 Inch—, r r - S ` jSldawolt Removal Tree Removal d6 tp 15 Jnitsi - 8 units �_---- i [ C Temporary Fence 5�O sq. tt. U a 1500.0 ft. L? t ''�� -----1 - -` - m A �n A 4 } tea Trunk ProYectl®n - i5 u�it� p-1- Blanket ° 5,555.6 sq. ya. n ing. O.W.R. Traverse Line _r ._ _ - - - -- - -- - _ _ Appi , t g�n1 Ex I st'm} Lgt+t Unit to be Sae df Mulching and Fart!IIZing 15 acres S Relocated by Others. - - p � { a s FR-423 o a DRWG. $GENP30 TEND �.� GENERAL PROJECT PLAN AND 8(]RiNG LOCATIONS PLATE 1 Emergency Dewater 'Ova Breach Location • �; ,' • �*mow . r.�• s tit Denil Fishwa �•'. . 4 Step Spillway Existing Dam +a • ,f 1 M i lei e Bypass d. c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ CA#1 II Finance ❑ EST. , 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant El K a�� ty . CC 2011-43 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of City Council— April 12, 2011 Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Approval of minutes. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Jacquelyn Milscbewski Former City Clerk Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVH LE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY,APRIL 12, 2011 Mayor Burd called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Clerk Milschewski called the roll. Ward I Gilson Present Werderich Present Ward I I Golinski Present Plocher Present Ward III Munns Present(arrived 7:04) Sutcliff Present Ward IV Teeling Present Spears Present Also present: City Clerk Milschewski, City Treasurer Powell, City Attorney Orr, City Administrator/Interim Director of Park and Recreation Olson, Police Chief Hart,Deputy Chiefs of Police Hilt and Delany, Public Works Director Dhuse, Finance Director Fredrickson, City Engineer Wywrot and Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble. QUORUM A quorum was established. INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS Mayor Burd asked the staff and guests to introduce themselves. She welcomed the guests and asked them to enter their names on the attendance sheet provided. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Mayor Burd asked that Item#2 under the Mayor's Report, Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Regarding the Cultural Commission(CC 2011-24)be removed from the agenda. Amendment approved unanimously by a viva voce vote. COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Public Works Committee Meeting: 6:30 p.m., April 19, 2011 City Hall Conference Room Economic Development Committee: 6:30 p.m., May 3, 2011 City Hall Conference Room Administration Committee Meeting: 6:00 p.m., April 21, 2011 City Hall Conference Room Public Safety Committee Meeting: 6:30 p.m., April 28, 2011 City Hall Conference Room PRESENTATIONS Certificates of Recognition Mayor Burd presented the Yorkville High School Wrestlers with Certificates of Recognition for their success in the Class 2A Wrestling Tournament in Champaign, Illinois. AJ Messenger took 1St Place, Connor Bass took 2nd Place and Adam Wyeth took 3rd Place. Brant Corwin and Clayton Bass were both qualifiers at the meet. She congratulated the young men and their coaches for their accomplishments. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. CITIZEN COMMENTS Kathy Neddo thanked and commended Mayor Burd and Aldermen Sutcliff and Plocher for their service to the city. She also wished the new aldermen the best. She gave a brief history of Yorkville happenings such as its creation in 1957,population growth, etc. She noted that Mayor Burd was the first female The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 12, 2011 —page 2 mayor and led the city through hard economic times. She hoped the next administration would follow through with what was started. Rolph Snobeck, Grande Reserve, thanked the City Council for serving. He stated that at a recent town hall meeting it was discussed that if the sales tax increase was approved by the voters, then the property tax increase could be rescinded. He asked the new City Council to follow through on this. He also reported that the Grande Reserve Homeowners Association fee was recently doubled. He asked what the City Council could do to help. He stated that Administrator Olson said the city should not get involved in the matter and he agreed with him. Last year the streets were top coated and weeds were removed by the Bank of America after the city stepped in to help. He felt that maybe if these things were not done the HOA fees would not have increased. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Police Reports for January 2011 (PS 2011-06) 2. Police Reports for February 2011 (PS 2011-07) 3. Ordinance 2011-12 -Amending the Code of Ordinances Providing for Liquor Control (Amending the Number of Package Liquor Licenses) -authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute (PS 2011-08) 4. Request to Sell 2003 Ford Crown Victoria(Ml 1) -authorize Police Department to dispose of vehicle via auction (PS 2011-09) Mayor Burd entertained a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. So moved by Alderman Werderich; seconded by Alderman Plocher. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Werderich-aye, Plocher-aye, Spears-aye, Munns-aye, Sutcliff-aye, Gilson-aye, Teeling-aye, Golinski-aye PLAN COMMISSION/ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL None. MINUTES FOR APPROVAL A motion was made by Alderman Sutcliff to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting of February 22, 2011 and March 8,2011; seconded by Alderman Werderich. Motion unanimously approved as amended by a viva voce vote. BILLS FOR APPROVAL A motion was made by Alderman Sutcliff to approve the paying of the bills listed on the Detailed Board Report dated April 5, 2011,totaling the following amounts: checks in the amount of$622,084.37 (vendors); $7,159.61 (payroll period ending 3/18/11); $213,068.29 (payroll period ending 3/26/11); for a total of$842,312.27(total); seconded by Alderman Werderich. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Plocher-aye, Spears-aye, Munns-aye, Sutcliff-aye, Gilson-aye, Teeling-aye, Golinski-aye, Werderich-aye REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT Ordinance 2011- 13 Approving the 2011-2012 Fiscal Budget for the United City of Yorkville (CC 2011-22) Mayor Burd entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving the 2011-2012 Fiscal Budget for the United City of Yorkville, as presented, and to authorize the Finance Director to insert the final subtotals for each budgetary fund into the ordinance, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Plocher; seconded by Alderman Werderich. Mayor Burd noted that there were several changes to the budget such as the one caused by the Library Board approval of their amended budget last night. Administrator Olson stated that the city's budget did not have to be approved until April 26, 2011. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 12, 2011 —page 3 Alderman Teeling stated that during the health insurance open enrollment she spoke to Human Resources about the amount of money spent on the elected official's health insurance. She felt the amount, $6,000.00/month not including the HRA amount, is substantial. She stated that Plano and Oswego do not offer this benefit and that Montgomery offers it but the elected officials pay for their insurance. She felt that this needed to be looked at. Administrator Olson explained that health insurance is part of the compensation package given to elected officials. This needs to be changed 180 days before the election. This could be changed for the 2013 election but not for the one that just took place. Officials can choose not to take the insurance in an effort to save money. Alderman Sutcliff stated that she wished she had known earlier how costly the insurance was. Her family was under her husband's health care plan however they switched to the city's plan. The cost for her family to be enrolled was $1,400.00/month. She stated that if she had known how much it cost it may have affected her decision. Alderman Gilson questioned an item in Administrator Olson's April 8, 2011 budget memo. He asked what the $3,000.00 aggregate for travel and lodging consisted of. Administrator Olson stated that this amount was for the newly elected official's seminar, general staff training and for a conference in Milwaukee Wisconsin that he will be attending. Alderman Gilson thought that all recommended training would be suspended. Administrator Olson stated that at the last meeting the City Council supported removing the IML Conference however recommended training would remain in the budget. Alderman Gilson had another question on the same memo. On page 2, it notes that the acceptance of the Park Board's recommended numbers resulted in a small increase to the transfer from the general fund to the Park&Recreation budget. Alderman Gilson asked what this amount was. Administrator Olson explained that the Park Board proposed a deficiency of$13,500.00. When there is a deficiency or surplus the money goes back to the general fund for cash flow purposes. They may need$13,500.00 but if it is not used it will go back into the general fund. He stated that the Park Board is trying to change the structure of their budget in order to make it easier to track items. Alderman Gilson clarified that the incoming City Council could amend the budget however this was not recommended by the auditors. Administrator Olson explained that the auditors do not like changes in mid-stream or midyear. Even though they do not recommend this, the new City Council may have different spending priorities. Director Fredrickson added that the auditors wouldn't mind a few amendments. Alderman Gilson felt that more cuts were needed in the area of Park&Recreation Department, Community Development, training, etc. Alderman Sutcliff noted that the senior garbage subsidy cost the city$120,000.00/year. She felt that if a senor qualifies for the Circuit Breaker program then they should receive the subsidy otherwise they should not get it. She stated that there are some seniors who are making over $100,000.00/year. Using the Circuit Breaker program as a qualifier would make the subsidy more equitable. She felt that the city was not in a financial place to offer the discount. Alderman Spears asked if the$120,000.00 covered all seniors getting the subsidy. She wanted to know what the number was based on. Alderman Sutcliff stated the figure was from staff. Administrator Olson added that 600 households receive the senior discount. Alderman Spears noted that the Circuit Breaker program was being cut. Also, there is a proposed cut to Medicare and Medicaid. She felt any assistance offered to the seniors was beneficial. Mayor Burd clarified that Alderman Sutcliff proposed using the criteria for the Circuit Breaker program to determine who got the senior garbage discount. Alderman Sutcliff stated that was what she proposed and felt it would be simple to qualify people using the criteria. Alderman Plocher suggested that a hardship criteria for everyone so the program would not just be for seniors. Alderman Gilson asked if staff would handle the verification of a person meeting the Circuit Breaker criteria and was concerned what would happen if the program was eliminated. Administrator Olson stated that the intent was to"steal"the Circuit Breaker formula and have the staff administer it. Alderman Gilson asked if any research was done as to how this would affect staff time. Alderman Sutcliff explained that people who qualify for the Circuit Breaker Program have a card they can show staff. She stated that she wanted to vote on amending the program. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 12, 2011 —page 4 Attorney Orr explained that a motion would be needed to amend the budget. Administrator Olson noted that the line item, garbage surcharge(page 28), is in the general fund. The proposed amount is $1.75 million. If the program is to be eliminated it needs to be amended to $1.295 million. The new figure reflects the complete elimination of the program. The city code would also have to be amended to address this. A motion was made by Alderman Sutcliff to amend the budget line item#01-000-44-00-4400 from$1.75 million to $1.295 million. Alderman Munns asked if the City Council was picking things out of the budget. Mayor Burd stated that it was up to the discretion of the City Council. Administrator Olson suggested that the line item remain as it is presented until it is determined how many seniors qualify for Circuit Breakers. He noted that the budget is a guideline. If it is the intention of the city to rescind the program then it can be taken out. However, if that is not the intention, it should be left as is. Alderman Werderich stated that changing the budget without changing the policy could leave the city in a precarious position. Alderman Sutcliff withdrew her motion. Original motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-2 Golinski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-nay, Sutcliff-aye, Munns-aye, Spears-nay, Plocher-aye, Werderich-aye CITY COUNCIL REPORT None. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT Attorney Orr reported that the Library Board has the sole right to prepare its budget and their levy is added to the corporate levy. The city cannot touch the library's budget or funds. Mayor Burd stated that there was discussion about the fund balance at the Library Board meeting. She asked Administrator Olson to address this. Administrator Olson stated that the city has been talking about budgetary deficiencies and the fund balance. He stated that when developing the budget a fund balance prediction is made and as revenues are spent this prediction changes. There is confusion related to this. There are funds shown in the Library saving account but these get depleted due to the audit and budgetary performance. The Library Board has designated funds in an account from impact fees for specific purposes not operations. If these funds are removed, the fund balance would be near zero. Mayor Burd stated that she was questioned as to why the City Council was not doing something about the Library's budget. She felt that staff could help by going to Library Board meetings to explain financial issues to them. CITY CLERK'S REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT No report. CITY ADMINISTATOR'S REPORT No report. DIRECTOR OF PARKS &RECREATION'S REPORT Administrator Olson reported that on May 14, 2011 is the ribbon cutting for the whitewater park. Invitations will be going out for the"Kayak Attack"this week and so far there are over one hundred people on the VIP list. The event is open to the public. FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT No report. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 12, 2011 —page 5 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT Director Dhuse reported that hydrant flushing was taking place on the north side of town. CHIEF OF POLICE'S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT No report. COMMUNITY RELATIONS OFFICER'S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY&LIAISON REPORT Kendall Care Breakfast Mayor Burd reported that she attended the Kendall Care Breakfast where reports on the PADS program, Kendall County Food Pantry, a community garden, etc. were given. They will also be holding a clinic on May 21,2011 from 9:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. at the Plano High School. They discussed that they are in need of Band-Aids, ibuprofen, combs, shampoo as well as monetary donations which can be sent to Cross Lutheran Church. Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District Alderman Gilson reported that he attended the Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District meeting on April 11, 2011 where they discussed ComEd power fluctuations, a John Deere tractor,repairs, etc. Also discussed was a need for a grease trap at OJ's bar. Stand by Me Alderman Gilson reminded everyone that the Kendall County Food Pantry was holding their benefit, "Stand by Me"at White Tail Ridge on May 7, 2011 at 5:00 p.m. Kendall County Senior Providers Alderman Spears reported that she attended the Kendall County Senior Providers meeting on April 4, 2011. They discussed the next fundraiser for the Honor Flight on July 15, 2011. Their goal is to raise enough for one flight or $50,000.00. The next Honor Flight to Washington D.C. is April 27,2011. Northeastern Illinois Area Agency on Aging Alderman Spears reported that she attended the Northeastern Illinois Area Agency on Aging annual executive board meeting where new officers were elected and a guest speaker presented. They also discussed changing their name to Agency on Aging. COMMITTEE REPORTS PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Burd entertained a motion to go into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing the appointment, employment, compensation, discipline,performance, or dismissal of specific employees of the public body or legal counsel for the public body, including hearing testimony on a complaint lodged against an employee of the public body or against legal counsel for the public body to determine its validity. So moved by Alderman Teeling; seconded by Alderman Werderich. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Spears-aye, Plocher-aye, Werderich-aye, Golinski-aye, Teeling-aye, Gilson-aye, Sutcliff-aye, Munns-aye The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—April 12, 2011 —page 6 The City Council entered Executive Session at 8:14 p.m. The City Council returned to regular session at 9:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Burd entertained a motion to adjourn the meeting. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Plocher. Adjournment of the meeting was unanimously approved by a viva voce vote. Meeting adjourned at 9:01 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Jacquelyn Milschewski, City Clerk City of Yorkville, Illinois c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ CA#2 II Finance ❑ EST. , � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑ K a ty . CC 2011-44 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of Special City Council—February 26, 2011 Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Approval of minutes. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting, Saturday, February 26, 2011 DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING City Council Chambers Saturday, February 26, 2011 —9:00am The meeting was called to order at 9:1 Dam by Mayor Valerie Burd. Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I: Werderich Absent Gilson Present WARD II: Golinski Present Plocher Present WARD III: Munns Present (left 12:30pm) Sutcliff Present WARD IV: Spears Present Teeling Present Establishment of Quorum: A quorum was established. Other City Officials in Attendance: Mayor Valerie Burd City Administrator Bart Olson Treasurer Bill Powell Finance Director Rob Fredrickson City Engineer Joe Wywrot Supt. Of Parks Scott Sleezer Public Works Director Eric Dhuse Police Chief Rich Hart City Park Designer Laura Schraw Supt. of Recreation Tim Evans Code Compliance Officer Paul Zabel Community Relations Officer Glory Spies Deputy Chief Delaney Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Other Attendees: Chris Funkhouser Tony Scott,Kendall County Record Jill Duchnowski, Yorkville Patch Lisa Peterson Jeff Peterson Russ Walter Citizen Comments: None The Mayor gave an overview of the past years' budgets. She commented on some of the events that led to the continuing financial crisis, the layoffs in 2010, the Fund Balance over the past years, landfill litigation and other topics. With conservative budgeting, the City expects to generate additional revenue by the end of the next fiscal year and that the Fund Balance will be increased. 1 Alderman Gilson asked to go on record as saying he thought some of the comments made were inaccurate. He also stated he did not vote in favor of the last budget and had in fact, proposed many cuts that were not accepted. For the record, Mayor Burd said she spoke in generalities and her comments did not reflect Alderman Gilson's opinions. Mr. Gilson further stated some hard budget decisions need to be made and he wants to decrease taxes and fees to residents. He asked for improved communication especially in reference to the landfill fees. Alderman Golinski said the deficit numbers changed in this budget. The Finance Director stated that it is due to adjustments in sales tax revenue. Mr. Golinski also questioned what steps have been taken to instill confidence that there will be a surplus. Administrator Olson said the Council must vote to implement some policy decisions, staff must stay within budget and the accounting system must be fluid. He added that the City will overestimate their expenses somewhat as well. Olson also said that the year over year numbers have improved. Business: (discussion began at 9:33am) 1. FY 2011-2012 Proposed Budget Mr. Olson prefaced the discussion by saying that many different sources are used for budget projections. A 3-year budget is being developed taking into consideration long-term goals and capital projects. Some of the projects are: Rt. 47 improvements, River Oak bridge, downtown development that he hopes to fund without borrowing. He estimated that money would have to be borrowed for Game Farm Road improvements. Administrator Olson explained the new budget format and then began the review. General Fund The City currently has a $492,939 deficit for 2010. The Fund Balance is expected to grow each year through 2014, however, less than the 25% recommended in City policy. Fox Industrial TIF Fund This fund has been closed since the bond is paid off and any surplus funds will be dispersed to taxing bodies including the City at about $23,000 this year. Countryside TIF Fund The developer is in default and the bond is outstanding. In 2019 there will be no money remaining. The debt service payments are being paid from the bond proceeds. Alderman Spears commented that TIF documents stated that the City would never be responsible for these bonds. For the record, she asked why the Council receives this misinformation that will cost the City money. Mayor Burd commented that the TIF 2 was approved in 2005. At that time, the numerous revenue sources would cover the TIF and was also based on developers not abandoning these projects. In the future, attorneys will be asked to consider worst-case scenarios. Fox Hill TIF (pg. 78) Each year the City goes out for bids for maintenance of the common areas. Sunflower SSA (pg. 81) Mr. Olson reported the same situation as for Fox Hill, however, there is a pond to maintain in this subdivision. A one-year levy may be required for pond dredging. Debt Service Fund (pg. 84) Mr. Olson recommended, going forward, that the City not abate this debt service fund in order to pay for the Rt. 47 and bridge improvement. Money will need to be borrowed for Game Farm Road improvements. Alderman Sutcliff commented that the City should not delay this, however, Olson said the City could not secure a loan at this time. Public Works Director Dhuse had previously suggested that the City purchase a paving machine and do the necessary work. This will be discussed in a future meeting. Municipal Building Fund (pg. 87) The City received $22,000 this year from Pulte as payment for a subdivision obligation. No new annexation agreements are currently on the table. Parks and Recreation Capital Fund (pg. 90) Any future impact fees received will be transferred from this fund to the Public Works Capital Fund towards debt service on the building shared by Public Works and Parks. Olson commented briefly on money earmarked for a park site in Raintree. The money was originally received from Lennar Builders and is being held in a separate bank account. Police Capital Fund (Pg. 93 & 95) The budget will allow one new car purchase per year. It was noted that the replacement schedule is not being following due to budgetary constraints and that cars are not being purchased until another breaks down. More money is being spent on maintenance costs, however, Olson said that by not replacing cars, money is being saved. Spears asked if this should be a Council decision and asked to have it re- addressed. An informal poll was taken of the Council members and after discussion, it was decided to allow the Police Department to make the decision about repairing or replacing. This decision will be reviewed next year. Chief Hart stated that the department has 23 cars at this time and that half the fleet is past the rotation time. The current cost of replacing a squad is $20,000 for the car and $20,000 for equipment per car according to Administrator Olson. Olson said he has data that shows individual car maintenance. A memo will be sent to all Council members. 3 Alderman Spears asked for a maintenance comparison of Public Works vehicles. Public Works Capital(pg. 96) Impact fees will be coming in and according to Olson, the primary expense in this budget is the purchase of the building shared with Parks. Debt service is $82,000 per year. The Fund will be depleted by the end of next year without a transfer from the General Fund. Administrator Olson said the policy question is whether the money should be repaid as a loan or if the General Fund should subsidize Public Works budget. Mayor Burd took an informal poll of the Council members and the consensus was that the amount should be shown as a loan. The money will be paid back proportionally and will be shown as a loan and negative Fund Balance. Library Fund (Pg. 1171 The City has no authority to change this budget that has already been approved by the Library Board. They have approved their 2011-2012 budget and will approve their 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 budgets in March. Olson said he issued a memo to them about deficit spending. Mayor Burd added that the Library Board informs the City of their projected levy by April to include the levy in the City budget. MFT Budget(Pg. 57) The City will receive $350,000 additional from the State over 3 fiscal years. It is proposed to transfer money from the General Fund in FY 2013-2014 to use on the River Road bridge and Rte. 47 repair. Bart said that MFT payments are based partially on populations, he explained how payments are made to municipalities and explained MFT-eligible purchases for road repairs. Downtown TIF (pg. 75) Mr. Olson said many buildings have been torn down and some projects are committed to be done. Rt. 47 improvements, sidewalk and street light improvements are some of those projects. The current TIF fund has about $500,000 that is co-mingled in the General Fund. However, it can only be spent on certain things. Mayor Burd asked if it should be co-mingled. Mr. Olson said it is OK to do this from an accounting standpoint and it is budgetarily tracked. Olson also said, additional interest costs could be incurred to borrow funds for departments operating in deficit. The TIF money will not be spent until there is a positive Fund Balance in the General Fund. City Wide Capital Fund Project (pg. 99) Grant reimbursements and road contribution fees were discussed. Bart said money would be kept in the general fund for Planning & Building/Zoning salaries only and other funds would be transferred to a city-wide capital fund. Permits & fees have been decreased from last year. He noted that next year is the final payment for the Clark property. No Rt. 47 expenses are in this category. Alderman Teeling asked about the Safe Route to School Grant and asked if it could be placed on the developer punchlist. This cannot be done. 4 Land Cash (pg. 66) All expenses and revenue in Land Cash are related to grant projects. A portion of these funds pertain to salaries. IDNR recently opened a grant program, but the time frame for submission was very soon. Municipalities were told to submit materials they had. Public Hearings are also required. This will come to City Council on March 8 and the Hearing is on March 10. The City's application will be for trails. If awarded, it is a 2-year grant and there will be no impact to land cash. Alderman Golinski noted he does not approve of salaries taken from land cash and asked for justification. The meeting paused at 11:35 and resumed at 12:33pm. Parks & Recreation (pg. 60) This budget is formalizing what has occurred in the last 2 years. Mr. Olson is proposing no fund balance until the City General Fund increases 15-25% and then returning to a budgeting process. Programs will be added and he hopes for 30% profit margin on each class. He discussed revenue that is received from a cell phone tower located in one of the parks. Alderman Gilson commented that the revenue should be placed in the General Fund, not in Parks and Rec. Mr. Olson had decreased the fund transfer from General Fund because of this. Alderman Spears questioned why the cell tower fees would be treated differently than adjudication funds that are placed in the General Fund. Mr. Olson answered that the Police Department is paid from the General Fund while the Parks &Rec has funding from programs. Alderman Gilson suggested that changes should be made and the cell tower funds should be placed in the General Fund. Proposals made for next year are: no furloughs and that a small increase be made for the IT department. Mr. Olson also said that City should join a consortium with other towns and share GIS personnel. IT services will be used as needed and spending will be monitored. Cell phones for Park personnel were also discussed and Alderman Gilson commented that he did not think all the phones were needed. Administrator Olson said that cell phones will become necessary in the future and will actually save money. Alderman Gilson suggested cuts to contract services and program instructors. He also said money for hand tools should be decreased. Alderman Plocher suggested cutting trees and flowers by $500. It was noted that there are now 42 parks with only 15 in 2000. The Parks Department is maintaining 270 acres and 50 locations. The Parks Department also maintains boulevards. Mayor Burd said it is important to keep the community attractive. In the Recreation portion of the budget, Mr. Olson noted that the Superintendent of Parks position will not be filled. Insurance for Hometown Days was discussed. The insurance would guarantee generating a certain amount of money. 5 A recommendation was made to delete the "publishing" from Recreation, however, this money is for printing the class offerings. Mr. Olson said that most participants get their information from these printed programs. Alderman Spears said there was a suggestion in the public that aldermen had said recreational programs should be cut, however, she said that is not true. She wanted that clarified. Recreation Center (pg. 113) Mr. Olson noted that the surplus is covering the deficit in Parks and Rec. It is not shown in the budget at this time. He said the deficit will be $80,000 due to taxes and an increase in the lease. The lease is being re-negotiated, however, an appraisal is needed due to decreased property values. Replacing the HVAC system is also needed at a cost of about $30,000, however, it is not clear who pays for it. Grant programs were discussed in conjunction with the building, however, City ownership might be required. This would be a policy decision and will be discussed at a Council meeting. Audited memberships and all other fees generated $574,000 , however, projections showed $582,000. Gilson suggested not doing the upgrades and let the lease expire, however, Mayor Burd said the City has a contract for repairs. Other repair costs were discussed also. Mayor Burd said many people pass through that building each year, more than the Parks and Rec building and that it serves the public's need for recreation. Gilson replied that it is not self-sustaining as represented nor is it generating enough revenue. He said it will be in deficit for several years. For the record, Alderman Spears stated that she did not support a bond for a community center or a new police building, as earlier stated in the meeting. She said this subject was discussed when she was chairman of the Administration committee. She further clarified that the community center would have been for both seniors and youth. Also for the record, Alderman Golinski stated that he did not assist in the Rec Center negotiations. He said he attended an Executive Session, but did not negotiate. General Fund (Pg. 26) Mr. Olson predicted a surplus of$765,000 next year and a surplus thereafter. This year the Police Pension was broken out separately in order to levy for contributions and to insure the actuarial plan is being planned. Fox Industrial TIF will generate money this budget year. The decrease in traffic fines and legal expense reimbursement were also discussed. Administration (pg. 30) All departments have a full year of salary budgeted for employees. Training money was allocated, but Alderman Spears did not favor money for training in view of the poor economy. This department showed a high cost of postage, however, Bart Olson said all postage expense was shown in this category. Gilson questioned what would happen if Metra 6 West fees were not paid. Olson said the City would not reap the benefit of lobbying and the value received outweighs the fees in his opinion. Alderman Sutcliff said it has been 2 years since staff has attended conferences and feels it would be beneficial for the City. Bart will provide a breakdown of training issues. Finance (pg. 34) Auditing services were decreased and the auditor contract will be expiring. Alderman Golinski questioned what the City pays for auditors and said that other cities pay much less. It is expected the City will save money in the next budget year. Previous reconciliations had to be done to revise the books and increased auditing fees resulted. Community Relations The full time employee was reduced to part time. Holiday Under the Stars will not be shown in the budget and sponsorship money will be used for expenses and handled on a balance sheet level. Most employees who work the event work flex time. Mr. Gilson recommended cutting this department until the City is solvent, however, Alderman Teeling said this department sends out vital information to the residents. Ms. Spears said she felt the Aldermen can distribute information to their ward. Alderman Sutcliff also defended the department saying the Community Relations Officer disseminates information on line and sends e-blasts. Events planned by this department attract people who spend money in the City. Mayor Burd took an informal poll of the Council members and the majority recommended retaining this department. Engineering (pg 37) Mr. Olson said there are fewer staff members. The increase in computer software will allow the department to replace outdated equipment. The Engineering Tech also performs JULIE and sewer locates. Police Department (pg. 39/41) Mr. Olson said there were some corrections on this budget. Alderman Plocher asked if the school system could help pay for crossing guards and the resource officer. The inter-governmental agreement covers this according to Mr. Olson. Services provided by the City should roughly equal those provided by the school, however, he said the City costs are usually greater. There was also discussion of refurbishing the track and parking lot. Alderman Spears said she supports the Public Works and Police Department and the City should concentrate on keeping them maintained accordingly. She stated the Police Department is short-staffed. To help in that area she tried to establish a Neighborhood Watch due to short-staffing. She added that the officers have not had raises in 3 years. Ticket revenue has also decreased. Mr. Olson said the training items were mandatory. Mayor Burd said the police received pay raises due to their contract, but did not have furloughs. Chief Hart said hiring has stopped at this time due to lack of grants and growth The Police Department now has about 28%of the budget. Alderman Spears said, by comparison other towns have a higher amount, averaging around 50%. 7 Mr. Olson asked the City to refrain from adding officers until the City can afford them. Community Development (Pg. 44) There are fewer staff members and a reduction was made in computer equipment. The overall budget is 16% less than last year. Krysti Barksdale-Noble also gave a brief overview of the department. Administrator Olson added this will be the first department to expand when growth resumes. Public Works (pg. 46) Mosquito spraying was a sizeable expense in the 2010 budget, but it is proposed to not spray in the next couple years. Overtime also decreased. The training included in the budget is mandatory according to Director Eric Dhuse. His department is also doing more of their own equipment repairs. Administrative Services (pg. 49) The sales tax rebate was increased based on trends. Bad debt is being shown in the budget as well. Also reflected is a large increase in health insurance and Cobra costs. At this time, the Mayor suggested adjourning the meeting due to the lateness of the day. The remainder of the budget will be discussed on March 8th. A motion was made by Diane Teeling to adjourn and seconded by Robyn Sutcliff. The meeting adjourned at 4:19pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young 8 c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ CA#3 II Finance ■ EST. , 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Public Works ❑ CC 2011-45 Kend'11 mly El<`E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Bill Payments - $955,142.11 Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Approval of bill payments. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Amy Simmons Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT FISCAL YEAR 10/11 ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- AA000001 CARLO D. COLOSIMO 050411 05/04/11 01 ADMIN-04/20/11 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-62-00-5443 05/24/11 150.00 ADMIN ADJUDICATION CONTRAC INVOICE TOTAL: 150.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 150.00 ACCURINT LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT. 1249304-20110430 04/30/11 01 POLICE-APRIL FEES 01-210-65-00-5804 05/24/11 50.00 OPERATING SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 50.00 ATT AT&T 6305533436-0411 04/25/11 01 POLICE-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-210-62-00-5436 05/24/11 40.06 TELEPHONE INVOICE TOTAL: 40.06 6305536805-0411 04/25/11 01 WATER OP-MONTHLY CHARGES 51-000-62-00-5436 05/24/11 81.89 TELEPHONE INVOICE TOTAL: 81.89 VENDOR TOTAL: 121.95 ATTLONG AT&T LONG DISTANCE 82893213-0411 05/01/11 01 ADMIN-APRIL LONG DISTANCE 01-110-62-00-5436 05/24/11 0.04 TELEPHONE 02 POLICE-APRIL LONG DISTANCE 01-210-62-00-5436 19.14 TELEPHONE 03 WATER OP-APRIL LONG DISTANCE 51-000-62-00-5436 11.65 TELEPHONE INVOICE TOTAL: 30.83 VENDOR TOTAL: 30.83 BATTERYS BATTERY SERVICE CORPORATION _1_ DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BATTERYS BATTERY SERVICE CORPORATION 209517 04/15/11 01 WATER OP-CELL PHONE BATTERIES 51-000-62-00-5438 05/24/11 44.90 CELLULAR TELEPHONE INVOICE TOTAL: 44.90 VENDOR TOTAL: 44.90 CARGILL CARGILL, INC 3168729 04/26/11 01 WATER OP-BULK SALT 51-000-62-00-5407 05/24/11 2, 909.08 TREATMENT FACILITIES O&M INVOICE TOTAL: 2,909.08 3170426 04/28/11 01 WATER OP-SULK SALT 51-000-62-00-5407 05/24/11 2,837.67 TREATMENT FACILITIES O&M INVOICE TOTAL: 2,837.67 VENDOR TOTAL: 5,746.75 CDWG CDW GOVERNMENT INC. XDG8325 04/20/11 01 SEWER OP-MEMORY STICKS FOR 52-000-75-00-7002 05/24/11 150.09 COMPUTER EQUIP & SOFTWARE 02 SERVER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 150.09 XGC6844 04/29/11 01 POLICE-2 COMPUTERS 01-210-75-00-7002 05/24/11 2,564.99 COMP. EQUIPMENT & SOFTWARE INVOICE TOTAL: 2, 564.99 VENDOR TOTAL: 2,715.08 CENTRALL CENTRAL LIMESTONE COMPANY, INC 13885 05/03/11 01 WATER OP-GRAVEL 51-000-65-00 5817 05/24/11 154.90 GRAVEL INVOICE TOTAL: 154.90 VENDOR TOTAL: 154.90 -2- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P_O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CLASLAND CLASSIC LANDSCAPE, LTD 71521 04/30/11 01 FOX HILL SSA-APRIL LAWN 11-000-65-00-5416 05/24/11 306.82 MAINTENANCE COMMON GROUNDS 02 MAINTENANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 306.82 71522 04/30/11 01 SUNFLOWER SSA-APRIL LAWN 12-000-65-00-5416 05/24/11 520.00 MAINTENANCE COMMON GROUNDS 02 MAINTENANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 520.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 826.82 COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 0185079109-0511 05/03/11 01 WATER OP-420 FAIRHAVEN 51 000-62-00-5435 05/24/11 195.25 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 195.25 0435113116-0511 05/04/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS O1 410-62-00-5435 05/24/11 93.00 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 93.00 0903040077-0511 04/30/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410 62-00 5435 05/24/11 3,129.91 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 3, 129.91 0908014004 0511 05/03/11 01 WATER OP-WELLS 51-000 62-00 5435 05/24/11 127.68 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 127.68 0966038077 0511 05/02/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-62-00-5435 05/24/11 100.65 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 100.65 1407125045-0511 05/04/11 01 SEWER OP FOXHILL 7 LIFT 52-000 62-00-5435 05/24/11 93.82 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 93.82 -3- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 2019099044-0511 05/06/11 01 WATER OP-WELLS 51-000-62-00-5435 05/24/11 56.51 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 56.51 2668047007-0511 04/29/11 01 SEWER OP-1908 RAINTREE RD 52-000-62-00-5435 05/24/11 242.13 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 242.13 2961017043-0511 04/29/11 01 SEWER OP-PRESTWICK LIFT 52-000-62-00-5435 05/24/11 116.39 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 116.39 4085080033-0511 05/04/11 01 WATER OP-1991 CANNONBALL TRAIL 51-000-62-00-5435 05/24/11 282.44 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 282.44 4449087016-0511 05/06/11 01 SEWER OP-LIFT STATIONS 52-000-62-00-5435 05/24/11 1, 031.51 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 1,031.51 4475093053-0511 05/03/11 01 WATER OP-610 TOWER LANE 51-000-62-00-5435 05/24/11 203.73 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 203.73 VENDOR TOTAL: 5,673.02 CONSTELL CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY 0003301121 05/04/11 01 WATER OP-ELECTRICITY 51-000-62-00-5435 05/24/11 3,762.10 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 3,762.10 0003309575 05/05/11 01 WATER OP-610 TOWER LANE 51 000-62-00-5435 05/24/11 4,268.17 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 4,268.17 VENDOR TOTAL: 8,030.27 -4- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CPICOMP CHRISTOPHER J. PLASCH CPI-466 04/11/11 01 FINANCE-APRIL COMPUTER 01-120-62-00-5401 05/24/11 1,670.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 02 ASSISTANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,670.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 1,670.00 DEPO DEPO COURT REPORTING SVC, INC 14966 05/06/11 01 POLICE-APRIL 13 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-62-00-5443 05/24/11 175.00 ADMIN ADJUDICATION CONTRAC INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 14971 05/06/11 01 POLICE-APRIL 27 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-62-00-5443 05/24/11 175.00 ADMIN ADJUDICATION CONTRAC INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 350.00 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 49173 04/28/11 01 MFT-ROUTE 47 PARKING 15-000-75-00-7124 05/24/11 781.78 OLD JAIL 02 IMPROVEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 781.78 49174 04/28/11 01 ENG-ROB ROY.CREEK DRAINAGE 01-150-62-00-5401 05/24/11 121.50 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 02 STUDY WORK ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 121.50 VENDOR TOTAL: 903.28 EJEQUIP EJ EQUIPMENT 0044544 04/25/11 01 STREETS-HOSE SUCTION 01-410-62-00-5409 05/24/11 430.69 MAINTENANCE--VEHICLES INVOICE TOTAL: 430.69 VENDOR TOTAL: 430.69 -5- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P_O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EXELON EXELON ENERGY 200306900111 05/03/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS O1 410-62-00-5435 05/24/11 88.13 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 88.13 200306900120 05/07/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-62-00-5435 05/24/11 152.56 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 152.56 200307000080 04/26/11 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-62-00-5435 05/24/11 2,755.42 ELECTRICITY INVOICE TOTAL: 2,755.42 VENDOR TOTAL: 2,996.11 FEDEX FEDEX 7-475-30203 04/27/11 01 COMM/DEV-1 PKG. TO VERIZON 01-220-65-00-5808 05/24/11 31.47 POSTAGE & SHIPPING 02 WIRELESS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 31.47 VENDOR TOTAL: 31.47 FOXRIDGE FOX RIDGE STONE 2121 05/02/11 01 WATER OP GRAVEL 51-000-65-00 5817 05/24/11 188.37 GRAVEL INVOICE TOTAL: 188.37 VENDOR TOTAL: 188.37 GALLS GALL'S INC. 511323658 04/21/11 01 POLICE-BOOT 01-210-62-00-5421 05/24/11 105.48 WEARING APPAREL INVOICE TOTAL: 105.48 VENDOR TOTAL: 105.48 -6- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O_ # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HACH HACH COMPANY 7222296 04/2.8/11 01 WATER OP-CHEMICALS 51-000-62-00-5407 05/24/11 505.67 TREATMENT FACILITIES O&M INVOICE TOTAL: 505.67 VENDOR TOTAL: 505.67 INFRASOL INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, INC. YKV-110428 04/28/11 01 SEWER OP-MANHOLE 52-000-62-00-5419 05/24/11 7,209.00 MAINTENANCE-SANITARY SEWER 02 REHABILITATION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 7,209.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 7,209.00 JAYMHEAP JAY M_ HEAP & ASSOCIATES, LTD 041911 04/19/11 01 MFT-ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 15-000-75-00-7119 05/24/11 5,000.00 GAME FARM ROAD 02 NEGOTIATIONS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 5,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 5,000.00 JCM JCM UNIFORMS, INC. 652791 04/27/11 01 POLICE-UNDER ARMOUR SHOE 01-210-62-00-5421 05/24/11 90.99 WEARING APPAREL INVOICE TOTAL: 90.99 VENDOR TOTAL: 90.99 JIMSTRCK JAMES GRIBBLE 4015-11 04/29/11 01 STREETS-INSPECTIONS 01-410-62-00-5408 05/24/11 210.00 MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT INVOICE TOTAL: 210.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 210.00 -7- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JSHOES J'S SHOE REPAIR 7518-2 04/27/11 01 STREETS-BOOTS 01-410-62-00-5421 05/24/11 140.00 WEARING APPAREL INVOICE TOTAL: 140.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 140.00 KENPRINT ANNETTE M. POWELL 18330 04/29/11 01 COMM/DEV-INSPECTION FIELD 01-220-65-00-5804 05/24/11 68.20 OPERATING SUPPLIES 02 NOTICES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 68.20 VENDOR TOTAL: 68.20 KONICAMI KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 217707292 04/29/11 01 POLICE-COPIER CHARGES 01-210-65-00-5809 05/24/11 15.98 PRINTING & COPYING INVOICE TOTAL: 15.98 217707293 04/29/11 01 ADMIN-B/W COPIER CHARGES 01-110-65-00-5809 05/24/11 83.91 PRINTING & COPYING 02 ADMIN-COLOR COPIER CHARGES 01-110-65-00-5809 212.64 PRINTING & COPYING INVOICE TOTAL: 296.55 217707342 04/29/11 01 WATER OP-COPIER CHARGES 51 000-65 00 5809 05/24/11 6.45 PRINTING & COPYING INVOICE TOTAL: 6.45 217707343 04/29/11 01 POLICE- COPIER CHARGES 01-210-65 00-5809 05/24/11 70.41 PRINTING & COPYING INVOICE TOTAL: 70.41 217707344 04/29/11 01 ENG-COPIER CHARGES 01-150 65-00 5809 05/24/11 55.53 PRINTING & COPYING -8- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ KONICAMI KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS 217707344 04/29/11 02 COM/DEV-COPIER CHARGES 01-220-65-00-5809 05/24/11 55.53 PRINTING & COPYING INVOICE TOTAL: 111.06 VENDOR TOTAL: 500.45 MCKIRGN RANDY MCKIRGAN 70377 04/20/11 01 STREETS-BIO-DIESEL 01-410-65-00-5812 05/24/11 1,046.64 GASOLINE 02 WATER OP-BIO-DIESEL 51-000-65-00-5812 1,046.64 GASOLINE 03 SEWER OP-BIO DIESEL 52-000-65-00-5812 1, 046.64 GASOLINE INVOICE TOTAL: 3,139.92 VENDOR TOTAL: 3, 139.92 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 78706 04/25/11 01 WATER OP-HOSE & REGULATORY 51-000-65-00-5804 05/24/11 10.48 OPERATING SUPPLIES 02 ASSEMBLY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10.48 78726 04/25/11 01 WATER OP-MERCHANDISE RETURN 51-000-65-00-5804 05/24/11 -10.48 OPERATING SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: -10.48 78732 04/25/11 01 WATER OP-FLARE, HOSE & 51-000-65-00-5804 05/24/11 12.54 OPERATING SUPPLIES 02 REGULATORY ASSEMBLY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 12.54 79292 04/27/11 01 WATER OP-HEAVY DUTY PLUG 51-000-65-00 5804 05/24/11 7.27 OPERATING SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: 7.27 -9- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P_O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT --------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 79472 04/28/11 01 SEWER OP-OUTLET STRIP 52-000-65-00-5802 05/24/11 39.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: 39.95 VENDOR TOTAL: 59.76 METIND METROPOLITAN INDUSTRIES, INC. 0000245299 04/26/11 01 SEWER OP-INSTALLED BATTERY AND 52-000-62-00-5422 05/24/11 830.00 LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE 02 POWER SUPPLY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 630.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 830.00 METROWES METRO WEST COG 709 05/02/11 01 ADMIN-APRIL 28TH BOARD MEETING 01-110-64-00-5605 05/24/11 32.00 TRAVEL/MEALS/LODGING INVOICE TOTAL: 32.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 32.00 MIDAM MID AMERICAN WATER 67702A 04/08/11 01 WATER OP-CLEANOUT WATER COVER, 51-000-65-00-5804 05/24/11 1,103.96 OPERATING SUPPLIES 02 VALVE BOX RISERS. CURB BOX ** COMMENT ** 03 RISERS, PLUG LIDS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,103.96 67702A 1 04/11/11 01 WATER OP-2 VALVE BOX RISERS, 51-000-65-00-5804 05/24/11 190.00 OPERATING SUPPLIES 02 8 CURB BOX RISERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 190.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 1,293. 96 MJELECT MJ ELECTRICAL SUPPLY, INC. -10- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MJELECT MJ ELECTRICAL SUPPLY, INC. 1121364-00 04/04/11 01 STREETS-WIRE 01-410 -62-00-5416 05/24/11 34.50 MAINTENANCE PROPERTY INVOICE TOTAL: 34.50 VENDOR TOTAL: 34.50 MOONBEAM DIANE GIANNELLI OAKLEY 129 03/22/11 01 COMM/RELATIONS-VIDEO SERVICES 01-130-62-00-5401 05/24/11 100.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL: 100.00 130 04/12/11 01 COMM/RELATIONS-VIDEO SERVICES 01-130-62-00-5401 05/24/11 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 131 04/26/11 01 COMM/RELATIONS-VIDEO SERVICES 01-130-62-00-5401 05/24/11 50.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 200.00 NCI NORTHWEST COLLECTORS INC 069029 04/26/11 01 POLICE-COMM. ON COLLECTIONS 01-210-62-00-5443 05/24/11 64.00 ADMIN ADJUDICATION CONTRAC INVOICE TOTAL: 64.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 64.00 NEECORP NEE CORP NE-20 04/29/11 01 WATER OP-ANNUAL BACKFLOW 51-000-62-00-5407 05/24/11 740.00 TREATMENT FACILITIES O&M 02 PREVENTER TEST, COMPLETE ** COMMENT ** 03 RUBBER REPAIR KIT, BRASS PLUGS ** COMMENT ** 04 AND CAPS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 740.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 740.00 -11- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.0_ # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ NICOR NICOR GAS 00-41-22-8748 4-0511 05/06/11 01 ADMIN-1107 PRAIRIE LANE 01-110-78-00-9002 05/24/11 36.33 NICOR GAS INVOICE TOTAL: 36.33 15-41-50-1000 6-0511 05/06/11 01 ADMIN-804 GAME FARM ROAD 01-110-78-00-9002 05/24/11 229.90 NICOR GAS INVOICE TOTAL: 229.90 15-64-61-3532 5-0511 05/06/11 01 ADMIN-1991 CANNONBALL TRAIL 01-110-78-00-9002 05/24/11 34.92 NICOR GAS INVOICE TOTAL: 34.92 23-45-91-4862 5-0511 05/04/11 01 ADMIN-101 BRUELL STREET 01-110-78-00-9002 05/24/11 86.78 NICOR GAS INVOICE TOTAL: 86.78 31-61-67-2493 1-0511 05/06/11 01 ADMIN-276 WINDHAM CIRCLE 01-110-78-00-9002 05/24/11 33.35 NICOR GAS INVOICE TOTAL: 33.35 45-12-25-4081 3-0511 05/03/11 01 ADMIN-201 W. HYDRAULIC STREET 01-110-78-00-9002 05/24/11 166.93 NICOR GAS INVOICE TOTAL: 166.93 46-69-47-6727 1-0511 05/06/11 01 ADMIN-1975 BRIDGE STREET 01-110-78-00-9002 05/24/11 88.95 NICOR GAS INVOICE TOTAL: 88.95 49 25-61-1000 5-0511 05/03/11 01 ADMIN-1 VAN EMMON 01-110-78-00-9002 05/24/11 98.99 NICOR GAS INVOICE TOTAL: 98.99 77-35-71-1000 4-0511 05/06/11 01 ADMIN-131 HYDRAULIC STREET 01 110-78 00-9002 05/24/11 94.37 NICOR GAS INVOICE TOTAL: 94.37 VENDOR TOTAL: 870.52 _12_ DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ OFFWORK OFFICE WORKS 188864 04/20/11 01 SEWER OP-PENS, PENCILS 52-000-65-00-5802 05/24/11 84.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: 84.45 VENDOR TOTAL: 84.45 OHERROND RAY O'HERRON COMPANY, INC. 0037406-IN 05/10/11 01 POLICE-COMMENDATION BARS 01-210-62-00-5421 05/24/11 349.60 WEARING APPAREL INVOICE TOTAL: 349.60 VENDOR TOTAL: 349.60 ORRK KATHLEEN FIELD ORR & ASSOC. 13445 05/08/11 01 ADMIN-MISCELLANEOUS LEGAL 01-110-61-00-5302 05/24/11 5,041.25 CORPORATE COUNSEL 02 MATTERS ** COMMENT ** 03 ADMIN-KENDALL MARKETPLACE 01-110-61-00-5302 277.50 CORPORATE COUNSEL 04 MATTERS ** COMMENT ** OS ADMIN-MEETINGS 01-110-61-00-5302 500.00 CORPORATE COUNSEL 06 ADMIN-WHISPERING MEADOWS 01-110-61-00-5302 92.50 CORPORATE COUNSEL 07 MATTERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 5,911.25 VENDOR TOTAL: 5,911.25 PARADISE PARADISE CAR WASH 222099 05/02/11 01 POLICE-CAR WASHES 01-210-62-00-5409 05/24/11 54.00 MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES INVOICE TOTAL: 54.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 54.00 -13- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PFPETT P.F. PETTIBONE & CO. 22699 04/29/11 01 POLICE-CITATION & COMPLAINT 01-210-65-00-5809 05/24/11 1,071.15 PRINTING & COPYING 02 TICKETS, WARNING TICKETS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,071.15 VENDOR TOTAL: 1,071.15 PROVENA PROVENA SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL 1302 04/01/11 01 FINANCE-APRIL EMPLOYEE 01-120-61-00-5310 05/24/11 202.08 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE 02 ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 202.08 VENDOR TOTAL: 202.08 QUILL QUILL CORPORATION 3963905 04/28/11 01 POLICE-ENVELOPES, CORRECTION 01-210-65-00-5802 05/24/11 55.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 02 TAPE, GEL INK REFILL, PENS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 55.71 VENDOR TOTAL: 55.71 R0000497 FOX VALLEY UNIFORM 2011-1203 04/26/11 01 POLICE-WORK GLOVES, SHIRTS 01-210-62-00-5421 05/24/11 300.71 WEARING APPAREL INVOICE TOTAL: 300.71 VENDOR TOTAL: 300.71 SERVICE SERVICE PRINTING CORPORATION 22265 03/31/11 01 COMM/RELATIONS°8,200 01-130-65-00-5810 05/24/11 1,988.79 PUBLISHING & ADVERTISING 02 NEWSLETTERS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,988.79 VENDOR TOTAL: 1, 988.79 -14- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ STREICH STREICHERS I832540 04/27/11 01 POLICE-BOOTS 01-210-62 00-5421 05/24/11 125.00 WEARING APPAREL INVOICE TOTAL: 125.00 I833817 05/03/11 01 POLICE-PANTS 01-210-62-00-5421 05/24/11 119.98 WEARING APPAREL INVOICE TOTAL: 119.98 VENDOR TOTAL: 244.98 SUPERIOR SUPERIOR ASPHALT MATERIALS LLC 20110285 04/28/11 01 MFT-COLD PATCH 15-000-75-00-7110 05/24/11 1,729.28 COLD PATCH INVOICE TOTAL: 1,729.28 VENDOR TOTAL: 1,729.28 TAPCO TAPCO I366814 05/02/11 01 MFT-SIGN 15-000-75-00-7007 05/24/11 41.95 SIGNS INVOICE TOTAL: 41.95 VENDOR TOTAL: 41.95 THORNE THORNE ELECTRIC 17098 05/06/11 01 STREETS-TRAFFIC LIGHT REPAIR 01-410-62-00-5414 05/24/11 22,083.19 MAINTENANCE-TRAFFIC SIGNAL 02 AT US34 AND GAME FARM ROAD ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 22,083.19 VENDOR TOTAL: 22,083.19 TPI TPI BUILDING CODE CONSULTANTS 5012 04/30/11 01 COMM/DEV-APRIL INSPECTIONS 01 220-61-00-5314 05/24/11 630.00 INSPECTIONS INVOICE TOTAL: 630.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 630.00 -15- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TUFFY KRIBBS AUTOMOTIVE, INC 22747 04/28/11 01 POLICE-BRAKE SYSTEM FLUSH, 01-210-62-00-5409 05/24/11 516.46 MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES 02 BRAKE PADS, ROTORS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 516.46 22773 04/30/11 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE 01-210-62-00-5409 05/24/11 20.76 MAINTENANCE - VEHICLES INVOICE TOTAL: 20.76 VENDOR TOTAL: 537.22 UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 00004296X2181 04/30/11 01 POLICE-1 PKG. TO PERFORMANCE 01-210-65-00-5808 05/24/11 46.22 POSTAGE & SHIPPING 02 MARKETING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 46.22 VENDOR TOTAL: 46.22 VEOLIA VEOLIA ES SOLID WASTE MIDWEST 700000656328 04/25/11 01 HEALTH & SANITATION-APRIL 01-540-62-00-5442 05/24/11 97,295.94 GARBAGE SERVICES 02 SERVICE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 97,295.94 VENDOR TOTAL: 97,295.94 WAREHOUS WAREHOUSE DIRECT 1116018-0 04/27/11 01 POLICE-PAPER 01 210-65-00-5802 05/24/11 299.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: 299.90 VENDOR TOTAL: 299.90 WOLFCOMP WOLF & COMPANY _16- DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WOLFCOMP WOLF & COMPANY 90271 03/23/11 01 FINANCE-FINAL BILLING FOR 01-120-62-00-5401 05/24/11 250.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 02 ATTENDANCE AT BOARD MEETING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 250.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 250.00 YBSD YORKVILLE BRISTOL 040911 04/09/11 01 TRUST & AGENCY-APRIL SANITARY 95-000-78-00-9008 05/24/11 233,901.34 YBSD PAYMENTS 02 FEES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 233,901.34 VENDOR TOTAL: 233,901.34 YORKNAPA YORKVILLE NAPA AUTO PARTS 958681 04/12/11 01 STREETS-CONNECTOR 01-410-62-00-5408 05/24/11 10.09 MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT INVOICE TOTAL: 10.09 959474 04/18/11 01 STREETS-AIR FILTER 01-410-62-00-5408 05/24/11 25.60 MAINTENANCE-EQUIPMENT INVOICE TOTAL: 25.60 959511 04/18/11 01 STREETS-OIL FILTERS 01-410-62-00-5409 05/24/11 9.88 MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES INVOICE TOTAL: 9.88 959519 04/18/11 01 STREETS-SERVICE JACK 01-410-65-00-5815 05/24/11 274.00 HAND TOOLS INVOICE TOTAL: 274.00 959870 04/21/11 01 OIL FILTER 52-000-62-00-5422 05/24/11 4.57 LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE INVOICE TOTAL: 4.57 DATE: 05/17/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 TIME: 10:34:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ YORKNAPA YORKVILLE NAPA AUTO PARTS 960601 04/27/11 01 STREETS-OIL FILTER 01-410-62-00-5409 05/24/11 18.36 MAINTENANCE-VEHICLES INVOICE TOTAL: 18.36 VENDOR TOTAL: 342.50 YORKPDPC YORKVILLE POLICE DEPT. 051111 05/11/11 01 PD CAPITAL-TITLE REQUEST FOR 20-000-65-00-5840 05/24/11 95.00 SEIZED VEHICLES 02 SEIZED VEHICLE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 95.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 95.00 YOUNGM MARLYS J. YOUNG 022611 05/08/11 01 ADMIN-FEBRUARY 26TH MEETING 01-110-62-00-5401 05/24/11 285.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 02 MINUTES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 285.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 285.00 TOTAL ALL INVOICES: 419,009.15 _'� 8. DATE: 05/18/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 11:28:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT FISCAL YEAR 11112 ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AA000001 CARLO D. COLOSIMO 050411-11 05/04/11 01 POLICE-MAY 04 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 05/24/11 150.00 ADMIN ADJ - HEARING OFFICE INVOICE TOTAL: 150.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 150.00 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 610-7051841 05/03/11 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 05/24/11 44.98 WEARING APPAREL 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 44.98 WEARING APPAREL 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 44.98 WEARING APPAREL INVOICE TOTAL: 134.94 610-7056485 05/10/11 01 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 05/24/11 47.62 WEARING APPAREL 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 47.62 WEARING APPAREL 03 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 47.63 WEARING APPAREL INVOICE TOTAL: 142.87 VENDOR TOTAL: 277.81 AVANTI AVANTI 050411 05/04/11 01 ADMIN-ROSEWOOD CLOCK FOR 01-110-56-00-5610 05/24/11 70.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 02 MAYOR BURD ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 70.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 70.00 BARKLEYW WILLIAM BARKLEY 042911 04/29/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-REIMBURSEMENT 01 640-52-00-5216 05/24/11 467.06 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE -19- DATE: 05/18/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 11:28:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BARKLEYW WILLIAM BARKLEY 042911 04/29/11 02 FOR MAY HEALTH INS. PREMIUM ** COMMENT ** 05/24/11 INVOICE TOTAL: 467.06 VENDOR TOTAL: 467.06 BATTERYS BATTERY SERVICE CORPORATION 209808 05/06/11 01 WATER OP-BATTERY 51-510-56-00-5640 05/24/11 58.95 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE INVOICE TOTAL: 58.95 VENDOR TOTAL: 58.95 BCBS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD 050611 05/.06/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-JUNE HEALTH INS 01-640-52-00-5216 05/24/11 100,027.49 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 02 ADMIN SERVICES-JUNE DENTAL INS 01-640-52-00-5223 8,735.20 DENTAL & VISION INSURANCE INVOICE TOTAL: 108,762.69 VENDOR TOTAL: 108,762.69 BKFD BRISTOL KENDALL FIRE DEPART. 043011-DEV 05/05/11 01 TRUST/AGENCY DEVELOPMENT FEES 95-000-24-00-2452 05/24/11 5,000.00 BKFD DEVLP FEE ESCROW INVOICE TOTAL: 5,000.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 5,000.00 COMCAST COMCAST CABLE 042611 04/26/11 01 POLICE-MONTHLY CABLE 01-210-56-00-5620 05/24/11 4.17 OPERATING SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: 4.17 VENDOR TOTAL: 4.17 DEPO DERO COURT REPORTING SVC, INC -20- DATE: 05/18/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 DIME: 11:28:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O_ # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ REPO DEPO COURT REPORTING SVC, INC 14972 05106111 01 POLICE-MAY 4 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 05/24/11 175.00 ADMIN ADJ - HEARING OFFICE INVOICE TOTAL: 175.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 175.00 3NCAP ENCAP, INC. 22291 04/30/11 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-COOL SEASON 90-014-14-00-1111 05/24/11 747.25 ESCROW- ADMINISTRATION 02 GRASS TREATMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 747.25 VENDOR TOTAL: 747.25 3VANSONS EVANS & SONS BLACKTOP, INC. M41782 04/27/11 01 LAND CASH-TENNIS COURT 72-720-60-00-6036 05/24/11 63,279.63 RAINTREE VILLAGE 02 CONSTRUCTION AT RAIN TREE ** COMMENT ** 03 PARK ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 63,279.63 VENDOR TOTAL: 63,279.63 ?VFS FOX VALLEY FIRE & SAFETY 627416 05/06/11 01 STREETS-ANNUAL INSPECTION 01-410-56-00-5630 05/24/11 64.20 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 02 WATER OP-ANNUAL INSPECTION 51-510-56-00-5630 64.20 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 03 SEWER OP-ANNUAL INSPECTION 52-520-56-00-5630 64.20 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT INVOICE TOTAL: 192.60 VENDOR TOTAL: 192.60 CCMA INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MGMT -21- DATE: 05/18/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 11:28:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ICMA INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MGMT 2011DUES O5/10/11 01 ADMIN-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 01-110-54-00-5490 05/24/11 784.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 02 RENEWAL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 784.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 784.00 LLEAS ILLINOIS LAW ENFORCEMENT DUES1140 04/01/11 01 POLICE-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 01-210-54-00-5460 05/24/11 50.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 50.00 IPRF ILLINOIS PUBLIC RISK FUND 1771 05/02/11 01 ADMIN SERVICES-JUNE WORKERS 01-640-52-00-5231 05/24/11 10,470.00 LIABILITY INSURANCE 02 COMPENSATION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10,470.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 10,470.00 KCFENCE MICHAEL PAVLIK 050911 05/09/11 01 STREETS-WIRES, RAIL ENDS, 01-410-56-00-5656 05/24/11 66.00 PROPERTY & BUILDING MAINT 02 BROWN CAPS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 66.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 66.00 KCSHERIF ELAN FINANCIAL 051011 05/10/11 01 POLICE-GAS & HOTEL 01-210-54-00-5415 05/24/11 183.48 TRAVEL & LODGING 02 REIMBURSEMENT FOR MOCK PRISON ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 183.48 VENDOR TOTAL: 183.48 -22- DATE: 05/18/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 11:28:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LENNAR LENNAR CHICAGO, INC. 051011 05/10/11 01 SEWER OP-REIMBURSEMENT OF 52-520-75-00-7500 05/24/11 30,996.00 LENNAR-RAINTREE SWR RECAPT 02 SEWER RECAPTURE AGREEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 30,996.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 30,996.00 IENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 80492 05/02/11 01 STREETS-POST SUPPORT 01-410-56-00-5620 05/24/11 7.99 OPERATING SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: 7.99 80519 05/02/11 01 STREETS-LIQUID BAIT 01-410-56-00-5620 05/24/11 6.27 OPERATING SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: 6.27 80539 05/02/11 01 STREETS-SPRAYER 01-410-56-00-5620 05/24/11 19.92 OPERATING SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: 19.92 80858 05/03/11 01 WATER OP-CABLE, CABLE CLAMPS 51-510-56-00-5638 05/24/11 19.58 TREATMENT FACILITY SUPPLIE INVOICE TOTAL: 19.58 81016 05/04/11 01 POLICE-STAPLES 01-210-56-00-5620 05/24/11 8.72 OPERATING SUPPLIES INVOICE TOTAL: 8.72 VENDOR TOTAL: 62.48 PARKREAT PARKREATION 3542 05/10/11 01 RAINTREE PARK SHELTER 72-720-60-00-6036 05/24/11 22,000.00 RAINTREE VILLAGE INVOICE TOTAL: 22, 000.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 22,000.00 -23- DATE: 05/18/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 DIME: 11:28:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID. AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PUBSAFDI PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECT, INC 21979 05/24/11 01 POLICE-REPLACE INOP LED 01-210-54-00-5495 05/24/11 141.99 OUTSIDE REPAIR & MAINTENAN 02 LIGHTHEADS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 141.99 VENDOR TOTAL: 141.99 20000884 LARRY BROWN 385592 05/10/11 01 ADMIN-30 BARRELS 01-000-24-00-2425 05/24/11 450.00 GREEN COMMITTEE INVOICE TOTAL: 450.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 450.00 20000885 NATALIE THOMAS 051011 05/10/11 01 ADMIN-REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT ON 01-000-13-00-1371 05/24/11 186.55 A/R- UTILITY BILLING 02 FINAL UTILITY BILL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 186.55 VENDOR TOTAL: 186.55 20000886 TINA HEJINAR 050611 05/06/11 01 POLICE-REIMBURSEMENT FOR 01-210-54-00-5495 05/24/11 552.69 OUTSIDE REPAIR & MAINTENAN 02 REPAIR TO VEHICLE DAMAGED BY ** COMMENT ** 03 CROSSING GUARD ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 552.69 VENDOR TOTAL: 552.69 SENSUS SENSUS METERING SYSTEMS ZA12001324 05/04/11 01 WATER OP-ANNUAL SYSTEM SUPPORT 51-510-56-00-5664 05/24/11 1,452.00 METERS & PARTS -24- DATE: 05/18/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 11:28:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ID: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM VENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SENSUS SENSUS METERING SYSTEMS ZA12001324 05/04/11 02 RENEWAL ** COMMENT ** 05/24/11 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,452.00 VENDOR TOTAL: 1,452.00 3TREICH STREICHERS I834533 05/05/11 01 POLICE-BOOTS 01-210-56-00-5600 05/24/11 374.98 WEARING APPAREL INVOICE TOTAL: 374.98 VENDOR TOTAL: 374.98 PUFFY KRIBBS AUTOMOTIVE, INC 22801 05/02/11 01 POLICE-TPMS SENSOR, EVAP VENT 01-210-54-00-5495 05/24/11 382.84 OUTSIDE REPAIR & MAINTENAN 02 VALVE REPAIR, GAS CAP ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 382.84 22849 05/06/11 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE 01-210-54-00-5495 05/24/11 23.96 OUTSIDE REPAIR & MAINTENAN INVOICE TOTAL: 23.96 22888 05/09/11 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE 01-210-54-00-5495 05/24/11 23.96 OUTSIDE REPAIR & MAINTENAN INVOICE TOTAL: 23.96 VENDOR TOTAL: 430.76 (ORKPDPC YORKVILLE POLICE DEPT. 051111A 05/11/11 01 POLICE-POSTAGE 01-210-54-00-5452 05/24/11 10.65 POSTAGE & SHIPPING 02 PD CAPITAL-SEIZED VEHICLE 20-200-54-00-5462 95.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 03 TITLE REQUEST ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 105.65 VENDOR TOTAL: 105.65 -25- DATE: 05/18/11 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 LIME: 11:28:42 DETAIL BOARD REPORT ED: AP441000.WOW INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 05/24/2011 INVOICE # INVOICE ITEM JENDOR # DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # P.O. # DUE DATE ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ fORKSCHO YORKVILLE SCHOOL DIST #115 043111-LC 05/05/11 01 TRUST & AGENCY-LAND CASH FOR 95-000-24-00-2453 05/24/11 2, 123.04 SCHOOL LAND CASH ECSROW 02 FEBRUARY, MARCH AND APRIL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 2,123.04 VENDOR TOTAL: 2,123.04 TOTAL ALL INVOICES: 249,614.78 -26- UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY PAY PERIOD ENDING 4/30/11 PAID ON 5/20111 REGULAR IMRF FICA TOTALS MAYOR & LIQUOR COM. 943.33 0.00 60.92 1,004.25 CLERK 776.67 73.86 59.41 909.94 TREASURER 500.00 47.55 38.25 585.80 ALDERMAN 4,175.00 251.07 281.71 4,707.78 TOTALS 6,395.00 372.48 440.29 7,207.77 TOTAL PAYROLL 4/15/2011 7,207.77 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 7,207.77 _27_ UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY 5/7/2011 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS ADMINISTRATION 7,165.14 0.00 7,165.14 681.42 496.92 8,343.48 FINANCE 6,406.14 0.00 6,406.14 623.49 489.27 7,518.90 COMMUNITY REL. 30750.00 0.00 3,750.00 0.00 286.88 4,036.88 ENGINEERING 5,480.98 0.00 5,480.98 521.24 404.76 6,406.98 POLICE 75,127.86 3,393.37 78,521.23 434.49 5,791.96 84,747.68 COMMUNITY DEV. 8,895.20 0.00 8,895.20 845.93 640.96 10,382.09 STREETS 9,301.71 0.00 9,301.71 884.59 689.31 10,875.61 WATER 13,411.81 0.00 13,411.81 1,275.47 985.60 15,672.88 SEWER 9,438.35 0.00 9,438.35 897.57 692.70 11,028.62 PARKS 13,502.53 0.00 13,502.53 1,264.86 1,000.45 15,767.84 RECREATION 11,504.05 0.00 11,504.05 888.11 869.05 13,261.21 REC. CENTER 9,167.09 0.00 9,167.09 514.88 695.54 10,377.51 LIBRARY 17,840.44 0.00 17,840.44 885.13 1,337.03 20,062.60 TOTALS 190,991.30 3,393.37 1 194,384.67 1 9,717.18 14,380.43 218,482.28 TOTAL PAYROLL 5/7/2011 218,482.28 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS 218,482.28 _28_ UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE SUMMARY SHEET 5/24/2011 TOTAL PAYROLL FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS 4/30/2011 $7,207.77 TOTAL PAYROLL 5/13/2011 $218,482.28 TOTAL INVOICES FY 10/11 5/24/2011 $419,009.15 TOTAL INVOICES FY 11/12 5/24/2011 $249,614.78 BNY WIRE TRANSFER-$4.8M DEBT CERT. 6/10/2011 $16,575.00 BNY WIRE TRANSFER-2006A BOND 6/25/2011 $44,253.13 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $955,142.11 _29_ 0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ CA#4 III El�M Finance 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number u� W City Administrator ❑ °°°°oysea, `O Consultant ❑ County ❑ PW 2011-26 Kentlall <4L.E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Com2 Electronics Recycling Contract Renewal Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: This recommendation is to renew the contract with Con-12 for electronics recycling for an additional 2-year term Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 5/17/11 Action Taken: Moved forward to 5/24 CC consent agenda Item Number: PW 2011-26 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Jackie Dearborn Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: J 0 Memorandum EST.. "� 7836 To: Bart Olson, City Administrator -`� From: Jackie Dearborn, Civil Engineer Y�ua C CC: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Date: May� Y 3, 011 2 �If Subject: Com2 E-Waste Recycling Contract Renewal The United City of Yorkville entered into an agreement with Com2 Computers in February, 2009 to implement an electronic waste recycling program for residents. A collection box is set up to accept electronics for recycling during business hours at the Public Works building at 610 Tower Lane. Com2 makes a regularly scheduled weekly pick-up to empty the Gaylord box. They also provide two mobile a-waste collection days a year—all at no charge. Legislation was passed making manufacturers responsible for the costs of recycling residential electronic waste. As of January, 2010 there is no longer a charge for TVs and monitors and therefore paragraphs 2.a.ii., 2,a.iii and 2.b. have been eliminated from the current contract. It is important that this recycling program continues to operate at the City because in the state of Illinois all a-waste is banned from landfills effective January 1, 2012. It is my recommendation that we continue with this service and renew the Com2 E-Waste Recycling Agreement that for an additional 2-year term to expire April 30, 2013. Please add this item to the May 17, 2011 Public Works Committee Agenda. Com2 E-Waste Recycling Agreement This Agreement is entered into as of , 2011 by and between Com2 Computers and Technologies LLC an Illinois Company, (the"COMPANY") and the United City of Yorkville, (the "HOST"). Recitals WHEREAS, the COMPANY is a recycler of excess and surplus computers and electronics that has offered to implement an e-waste recycling program in the United City of Yorkville in the manner described below; and WHEREAS,most electronic products contain components and materials which are environmental and health risks; and WHEREAS, the Electronics Products Recycling and Reuse Act was passed by the Illinois General Assembly on September 17, 2008, and bans all e-waste from landfills after January 1, 2012; and WHEREAS, the HOST desires to provide e-waste recycling services on its property to its residents; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERMS AND TERMINATION: a. This agreement will have an initial term from the date of execution of this agreement through April 30, 2013. After the initial term, this Agreement may be renewed through mutual agreement by both parties for two (two) additional two (2) year terms. b. The COMPANY or the HOST may terminate this agreement upon notification to the other party,providing a 90 day notification period. 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY COMPANY AND THE HOST: a. COMPANY shall provide two Gaylord box to the Village.(40"x 48"x 39").Gaylord Box is the property of the COMPANY, being leased to the HOST at no cost for the term of the agreement. Box shall be set up in areas, as designated by the City, where residents can drop the following electronics for recycling at the designated locations. i. Calculators, cell phones, portable music players, mp3 players, CD players, tape players, radios, boom boxes, speakers, computer laptops, computer notebooks, desktop computers, printers, copiers, VCRs, DVD players, telephones, , and monitors are to be recycled at no charge to the residents or the HOST. b. If the computer, hard drive, or other media contains personal data, said equipment must be taken to one of the COMPANY'S permanent locations, by the City or the residents, for proper destruction: i. Com2 Lombard, 1196 C. South Main Street, Lombard, IL 60148 ii. Com2 Carol Stream, 140 Fullerton, Carol Stream, IL 60188 iii. Residents may opt to call Com2 for pickup, for an additional charge c. The HOST shall call the COMPANY when the Gaylord boxes are full to schedule a pick up. COMPANY shall pick up contents of Gaylord boxes for recycling. d. COMPANY shall document all electronics picked up from the HOST. e. COMPANY shall process all electronics according to EPA, State, and Federal guidelines. COMPANY shall not send any of the electronics or electronics components to a landfill at any time; nor will any of the recycling be performed outside the United States. The COMPANY shall provide a Certificate of Recycling to the HOST verifying that it has followed EPA, State, and Federal guidelines during the recycling and destruction process, and provide a report on the types and amount of items the Certificate references. f. The HOST shall support the COMPANY, by promoting the COMPANY'S recycling services in the United City of Yorkville through website promotion, quarterly newsletter, local TV and radio (when applicable) and allowing the company to partake in recycling collection events when organized by the City. g. The COMPANY shall conduct at least two mobile e-waste collection days in the Village each year by providing a truck with driver and one worker. Dates, times, and locations shall be agreed upon by both the COMPANY and the City. The City has the right to request COMPANY'S participation at additional e-waste collection days and attendance at local recycling events during the year, above and beyond the two mandatory mobile e-waste collection days. 3. FORCE MAJEURE. Neither party shall be liable for delay or default in delivery for any cause beyond that party's reasonable control, including, but not limited to, shortage of labor, raw material, production or transportation facilities, labor difficulty involving that party or others, fire, flood or other casualty. In the event of any delay in that party's performance due in whole or in part to any cause beyond that party's reasonable control, that party shall have such additional time for performance as may be reasonably necessary under the circumstances. 4. NON-WAIVER. The waiver of any breach of the terms of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other or further breach hereunder, whether or not of a like kind or nature. 5. NOTICES. Any notice given by either party hereto to the other party shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given by overnight delivery service or by the sending thereof by facsimile and in such case confirmed by regular mail to the addresses set forth below for the other party (or at such other address as may be specified in writing by such other party from time to time): If to the Company: Com2 Computers and Technologies LLC 140 E. Fullerton Carol Stream, IL 60188 Attention: Saheem Baloch Facsimile: (630) 690-COM2 (2662) If to the Host: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Yorkville, M 60560 Attention: City Clerk Facsimile: 630-553-7575 6. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. Neither party shall assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party; provided that a party may assign this agreement to an affiliate or to a purchaser of its business. 7. SEVERABILITY. In the event that anyone or more of these provisions is held invalid, iiiegal or unenforceable, such provision or provisions shall be severed and the remaining provision or provisions shall remain binding and effective. 8. CONTROLLING LAW AND VENUE. This Agreement shall be construed and all the rights, powers and liabilities of the parties hereunder shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois. The parties hereby irrevocably consent and submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of Illinois state courts or federal courts sitting in Kendall County, Illinois, over any suit, action or proceeding which arises out of or relates in any way to this Agreement or any judgment entered in any court in respect hereof, and consents to serve of process by registered mail, return receipt requested or by any other means provided by Illinois law. The parties hereby waive the right to contest the jurisdiction and venue of said courts located in DuPage County, Illinois on the grounds of inconvenience or otherwise. 9. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties and cancels and supersedes all previous agreements, if any, between the parties. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by the Company and the Host, respectively. No terms and conditions that may be contained in any order, acknowledgement, invoice or other form issued by either party shall be of any effect unless signed by the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Host have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Com2 Computers and Technologies LLC By: Title: United City of Yorkville By: Title: i Com2 E-Waste Recycling Agreement This Agreement is entered into as of -Fi-6. a q , 2009 by and between Com2 Computers and Technologies LLC an Illinois Company, (the "COMPANY") and the United City of Yorkville, (the "HOST"). Recitals WHEREAS, the COMPANY is a recycler of excess and surplus computers and electronics that has offered to implement an a-waste recycling program in the United City of Yorkville in the manner described below; and WHEREAS, most electronic products contain components and materials which are environmental and health risks; and WHEREAS, the Electronics Products Recycling and Reuse Act was passed by the Illinois General Assembly on September 17, 2008,and bans all a-waste from landfills after January 1,2012; and WHEREAS, the HOST desires to provide a-waste recycling services on its property to its residents; NOW, THERF00RE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERMS AND TERMINATION: a. This agreement will have an initial term from the date of execution of this agreement through April 30, 2011. After the initial term, this Agreement may be renewed through mutual agreement by both parties for two(two) additional two(2)year terms. b. The COMPANY or the HOST may terminate this agreement upon notification to the other party,providing a 90 day notification period. 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY COMPANY AND TIM HOST: a. COMPANY shall provide one plastic Gaylord box with a lid to the City.(40" x 48" x 39').Gaylord Box is the property of the COMPANY,being leased to the HOST at no cost for the term of the agreement. Box shall be set up in areas, as designated by the City, where residents can drop the following electronics for recycling at the designated locations for the fee or charge as stipulated below. L Calculators, cell phones, portable music players, mp3 players, CD players, tape players, radios, boom boxes, speakers, computer laptops, computer notebooks, desktop computers, printers, copiers, VCRs, DVD players, telephones, microwaves, and other standard household electronic devices are to be recycled at no charge to the residents or the HOST. ii. CRT Monitors and terminals with CRT will be recycled for a $S per monitor or terminal fee. Fees or charges for CRT are amendable by COMPANY on a yearly basis, provided the COMPANY charges said fees in the amounts as is charged to its regular customers as posted on Com2's website. iii. Televisions will be recycled for a fee to be calculated at a rate of$1 per diagonal inch of TV screen,up to a maximum of$50,Fees or charges for televisions are amendable by COMPANY on a yearly basis,provided the COMPANY charges said fees in the amounts as is charged to its regular customers as posted on Com2's website. b. The HOST shall collect the fees for items dropped off at the designated locations and turn the collected fees over to the COMPANY upon pickup of the items from the HOST. c. If the computer, hard drive, or other media contains personal data, said equipment must be taken to one of the COWANY'S permanent locations, by the City or the residents, for proper destruction: i. Com2 Lombard, 1196 C. South Main Street,Lombard,IL 60148 ii. Com2 Cam Stream, 195 E.Kehoe Blvd.Unit 7,Carol Stream,IL 60188 iii. Residents may opt to call Com2 for pickup,for an additional charge d. The HOST shall call the COMPANY when the Gaylord boxes are full to schedule a pick up. COMPANY shall pick up contents of Gaylord boxes for recycling. e. COMPANY shall document all electronics picked up from the HOST. f. COMPANY shall process all electronics according to EPA, State, and Federal guidelines. COMPANY shall not send any of the electronics or electronics components to a landfill at any time; nor will any of the recycling be performed outside the United States. The COMPANY shall provide a Certificate of Destruction to the HOST verifying that it has followed EPA, State, and Federal guidelines during the recycling and destruction process, and provide a report on the types and amount of items the Certificate references. g. The HOST shall support the COMPANY, by promoting the COMPANY'S recycling services in the United City of Yorkville through website promotion, quarterly newsletter, local TV and radio (when applicable) and allowing the company to partake in recycling collection events when organized by the City. h. The COMPANY shall conduct at least two mobile a-waste collection days in the City each year by providing a truck with driver and one laborer. Dates, times, and locations shall be agreed upon by both the COMPANY and the CITY. The City has the tight to request COMPANY'S participation at additional a-waste collection days and attendance at local recycling events during the year, above and beyond the two mandatory mobile a-waste collection days. 3. FORCE MAJEM. Neither party shall be liable for delay or default in delivery for any cause beyond that party's reasonable control, including, but not limited to, shortage of labor, raw material, production or transportation facilities, labor difficulty involving that party or others, fire, flood or other casualty. Zn the event of any delay in that party's performance due in whole or in part to any cause beyond that party's reasonable control, that party shall have such additional time for performance as may be reasonably necessary under the circumstances. 4. NON-WAVER. The waiver of any breach of the terms of this Agreement shall not constitute the waiver of any other or further breach hereunder,whether or not of a like kind or nature. 5. NOTICES. Any notice given by either party hereto to the other party shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given by overnight delivery service or by the sending thereof by facsimile and in such case confirmed by regular mail to the addresses set forth below for the other party(or at such other address as may be specified in writing by such other party from time to time): If to the Company: Com2 Computers and Technologies LLC 1 195 E. Kehoe Blvd. Carol Stream,IL 60188 Attention: Saheem Baloch Facsimile: (630)690-COM2 (2662) If to the Host: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Attention: City Clerk Facsimile: 630-553-7575 6. ASSIOTNENT. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. Neither party shall assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other party, provided that a party may assign this agreement to an affiliate or to a purchaser of its business. 7. SEVERABILTTY. In the event that any one or more of these provisions is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such provision or provisions shall be severed and the remaining provision or provisions shall remain binding and effective. 8. CONTROLLING LAW AND VENUE. This Agreement shall be construed and all the rights, powers and liabilities of the parties hereunder shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois. The parties hereby irrevocably consent and submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of Illinois state courts or federal courts sitting in Kendall County, Illinois, over any suit, action or proceeding which arises out of or relates in any way to this Agreement or any judgment entered in any court in respect hereof, and consents to serve of process by registered mail, return receipt requested or by any other means provided by Illinois law, The parties hereby waive the right to contest the jurisdiction and venue of said courts located in Kendall County, Illinois on the grounds of inconvenience or otherwise. 9. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties and cancels and supersedes all previous agreements, if any, between the parties. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by the Company and the Host, respectively.No terms and conditions that may be contained in any order, acknowledgement, invoice or other form issued by either party shall be of any effect unless signed by the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the Company and the Host have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first written above, Com2 Computers and 'technologies L1LC Title: CITY OF YORKVILLE Title: Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J Q Legal ❑ CA#5 EST. 1836 Finance El Engineer ❑ Tracking Number City Administrator ❑ Public Works ■ KH+tl211 C-ty ` PW 2011-28 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Water Department Reports for March &April 2011 Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 5/17/11 Action Taken: Moved forward to 5/24 CC consent agenda. Item Number: PW 2011-28 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Brian Sorensen Water Name Department Agenda Item Notes: ° °lrf United City of Yorkville WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT MARCH 2011 MONTH/YEAR WELLS NO WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE PUMP THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE FEET FEET FEET GALLONS 3 1335 501 204 0 4 1393 542 188 11,262,000 7 1500 883 552 3,146,700 8 1500 861 479 18,277,000 9 1500 1125 576 8,351,000 TOTAL 41,036,700 CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS 2,763,100 GALLONS MORE THAN LAST MONTH 2,561,200 GALLONS LESS THAN LAST YEAR DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 1,343,900 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: 1,625,900 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE: 84.0 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT CHLORINE FED: 1208 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 3.6 MG/L FLUORIDE FED: 242 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 0.16 MG/L POLYPHOSPHATE 808 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 0.81 MG/L WATER QUALITY AS DETERMINED FROM SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BACTERIOLOGICAL: 18 SAMPLES TAKEN 18 SATISFACTORY 0 UNSATISFACTORY (EXPLAIN) FLUURIDE: 3 SAMPLE(S)TAKEN CONCENTRATION: 1.05 MG/L MAINTENANCE NUMBER OF METERS REPLACED: 11 NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED: 0 MXU'S 14 NEW CUSTOMERS RESIDENTIAL: 6 COMMERCIAL: 0 INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL: 1 COMMENTS �-0 c,). United City of Yorkville EMM 1636 WATER DEPARTMENT REPORT <i APRIL 2011 MONTH/YEAR WELLS NO WELL DEPTH PUMP DEPTH WATER ABOVE PUMP THIS MONTH'S PUMPAGE FEET FEET FEET GALLONS 3 1335 501 206 109,000 4 1393 542 189 8,922,000 7 1500 883 554 37,428,000 8 1500 861 476 16,826,000 9 1500 1125 576 11,204,000 TOTAL 40,694,800 CURRENT MONTH'S PUMPAGE IS 341,900 GALLONS LESS THAN LAST MONTH 3,808,200 GALLONS LESS THAN LAST YEAR DAILY AVERAGE PUMPED: 1,363,800 GALLONS DAILY MAXIMUM PUMPED: _2,224,300 GALLONS DAILY AVERAGE PER CAPITA USE: 85.2 GALLONS WATER TREATMENT CHLORINE FED: 1270 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 3.7 MG/L FLUORIDE FED: 244 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 0.21 MG/L POLYPHOSPHATE 885 LBS. CALCULATED CONCENTRATION: 0.86 MG/L WATER QUALITY AS DETERMINED FROM SAMPLES ANALYZED BY ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BACTERIOLOGICAL: 18 SAMPLES TAKEN 18 SATISFACTORY 0 UNSATISFACTORY (EXPLAIN) FLOURIDE: 3 SAMPLE(S)TAKEN CONCENTRATION: 1.01 MG/L MAINTENANCE NUMBER OF METERS REPLACED: 5 NUMBER OF LEAKS OR BREAKS REPAIRED: 0 MXU'S 6 NEW CUSTOMERS RESIDENTIAL: 0 COMMERCIAL: 0 INDUSTRIAL/GOVERNMENTAL: 1 COMMENTS OPERATED ALL THE FIRE HYDRANTS IN THE WATER SYSTEM. 0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ CA#6 III El�M Finance 1836 Engineer ■ Tracking Number u� City Administrator ❑ °°°°oysea, `O Consultant ❑ County ❑ PW 2011-36 Kentlall <4L.E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Sunflower Estates Unit 3 —Warranty Punchlist Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Recommend calling the developer's bond if the warranty punchlist is not completed by June 10, 2011. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 5/17/11 Action Taken: Moved forward to 5/24 CC consent agenda Item Number: PW 2011-36 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Joe Wywrot Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: CIP o� Memorandum Esr , 1636 To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer W p CC: Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk <LE �v Date: May 11, 2011 Subject: Sunflower Estates Unit 3 —Warranty Punchlist The one-year warranty period for Sunflower Estates Unit 3 will expire on June 22, 2011. We have checked the public infrastructure and found all to be in good condition with the exception of one dead parkway tree. There are also three other trees that might be dead or they might just be late in leafing out. I have called the developer and notified him that he will need to replace at least one tree and possibly four trees, and that this work must be completed by June 10, 2011. While I anticipate that the developer will perform the work, I recommend that we have access to the warranty bond should the work not be performed by that date. Therefore, I recommend that the City Council authorize the calling of Travelers Bond#B21867156M in the amount of$4000.00 if the warranty punchlist work is not completed by June 10, 2011. Please place this item on the May 17, 2011 Public Works Committee agenda for consideration. ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ CA#7 III El�M Finance 1836 Engineer ■ Tracking Number City Administrator ❑ °°°oyg �O Consultant ❑ K PW 2011-37 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Heartland Circle—Warranty Punchlist Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Recommend calling the developer's bond if the warranty punchlist is not completed by June 10, 2011. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 5/17/11 Action Taken: Moved forward to 5/24 CC consent agenda Item Number: PW 2011-37 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Joe Wywrot Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: CITE 0 Memorandum EST , 7836 To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer �W p CC: Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Cler K.W. —Y <LE Date: May 11, 2011 Subject: Heartland Circle—Warranty Punchlist The one-year warranty period for Heartland Circle will expire on June 22, 2011. We have checked the public infrastructure and found all to be in good condition with the exception of four dead parkway trees. I have called the developer and notified him that he will need to replace these four trees, and that this work must be completed by June 10, 2011. While I anticipate that the developer will perform the work, I recommend that we have access to the warranty bond should the work not be performed by that date. Therefore, I recommend that the City Council authorize the calling of American Southern Insurance Company Bond#B98804-010285 in the amount of$4000.00 if the warranty punchlist work is not completed by June 10, 2011. Please place this item on the May 17, 2011 Public Works Committee agenda for consideration. ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ CA#8 III El�M Finance 1836 Engineer ■ Tracking Number City Administrator ❑ °°°.f �O Consultant ❑ K PW 2011-38 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Game Farm Road/Somonauk Street Project—ROW& Temporary Easement Acquisition Meeting and Date: May 24, 2011 City Council Synopsis: Recommend that the City Administrator be authorized to approved acquisition and payments for up to 27 parcel transactions, subject to available funding and for those acquisitions where the property owner accepts the original appraised value of the acquisition. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Joe Wywrot Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: cip Memorandum u EST. -� 1 836 To: Bart Olson, City Administrator ot�ilr� From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer ® CC: Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk <LE Date: May 18, 2011 Subject: Game Farm Road/Somonauk Street Project - Right-of-Way and Temporary Easement Acquisition The City Council appropriated MFT funds at their April 26th meeting to pay for right-of-way and easement acquisitions related to 27 parcels for the Game Farm/Somonauk project. We have since received signed documents from three property owners, and wish to record those documents and pay the owners. Rather than sending each individual parcel acquisition to the City Council for approval, I recommend that the City Administrator be authorized to approve and execute the documents necessary to complete these 27 acquisition transactions. I also recommend that the City Administrator be authorized to approve payments to the individual property owners, subject to available funding approved for this task by the City Council. These recommendations were reviewed by the Public Works Committee at their meeting on May 17th. The committee recommended approval for acquisitions where the property owner accepts the original appraised value of the right-of-way or temporary easement. Acquisitions where the property owner does not accept the original appraised value would need to be sent to City Council for approval. Please place this item on the City Council agenda of May 24, 2011 for consideration. ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ CA#9 III El�M Finance 1836 Engineer ■ Tracking Number City Administrator ❑ °°°oyg �O l Consutant ❑ PW 2011-12 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: 802 S. Bridge Street—Proposed Groundwater Ordinance Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: This ordinance would allow the Illinois EPA to issue a No Further Remediation Letter to property owner. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 4/26/11 Action Taken: Tabled back to PW Committee Item Number: PW 2011-12 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Joe Wywrot Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: o� Memorandum EST. Z 1836 To: Bart Olson, City Administrat OL y From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer C_ p CC: Kathy Orr, City Attorney <L MC;� '' Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: April 20, 2011 Subject: 802 S. Bridge Street—Proposed Groundwater Ordinance At the March 22, 2011 City Council meeting, the proposed Highway Authority Agreement related to the property at 802 S. Bridge Street was tabled and additional information was requested regarding the extent of soil contamination at this site. The Highway Authority Agreement would have prohibited groundwater from the area from being used as potable water, and would also have required the city to regulate construction within the adjacent Orange Street right-of-way through a permit process. Approving the Highway Authority Agreement would allow the Illinois EPA to issue a No Further Remediation (NFR) letter, which would allow the property to be redeveloped. Attached find the data supplied by the Illinois EPA in response to our FOIA request. Also attached find information provided by Chase Environmental Group (the environmental consultant for the property owner). A summary of this information is as follows: • Four petroleum tanks were removed on 9/16/06. The four tanks had a total volume of 12,000 gallons, and had contained either gasoline or diesel fuel. • Soil samples were taken on 5/9/07, 9/19/07, and 1/30/08. • 1100 CY of contaminated soils were excavated and removed on March 25, 2009. • Additional soil samples were taken on 3/25/09 at thirteen locations during the excavation process. The soil at three locations (W4, W6, and W8)had too much contamination to satisfy the IEPA's residential clean-up objectives. Sample location W4 is located within the Orange Street ROW. • Soil samples at all locations (including W4, W6, and W8) satisfy the IEPA's clean-up objectives for construction workers and for industrial/commercial properties. • Soil borings taken in 2007 in general indicate that the higher levels of contamination lie more than 5 feet below the ground surface. • An excerpt of 415 ILCS 5/57.19 provided by Chase indicates that costs incurred for possible future remediation are still eligible for LUST fund reimbursement after issuance of an NFR letter. Since this issue was last before the City Council, Chase has suggested an alternative institutional control that could be adopted by the city that would allow an NFR letter to be issued but keep any future remediation work eligible for LUST fund reimbursement. That control would be to adopt an ordinance prohibiting the use of groundwater coming from the private property at 802 S. Bridge Street and the Orange Street ROW immediately north of 802 S. Bridge from being used as a potable water supply. This ordinance is similar to the Highway Authority Agreement, except that it eliminates the city permitting requirement. In my previous conversations with Chase and the Illinois EPA, neither had indicated that there was another institutional control measure that would be acceptable. I called back to the IEPA and confirmed that a groundwater ordinance would be an acceptable institutional control that would allow them to issue a NFR letter. They would need to review and approve the ordinance before issuing the letter. Attached find a proposed ordinance prohibiting groundwater coming from the site or from the Orange Street right-of-way immediately north of the site from being used as a potable water supply. I recommend that this ordinance be approved subject to review by our attorney and the Illinois EPA. Please place this item on the April 26, 2011 City Council agenda for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 2011- AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING THE USE OF GROUNDWATER AS A POTABLE WATER SUPPLY BY THE INSTALLATION OR USE OF POTABLE WATER SUPPLY WELLS OR BY ANY OTHER METHOD (802 SOUTH BRIDGE STREET) WHEREAS, certain property in the United City of Yorkville, Illinois commonly known as 802 South Bridge Street has been used over a period of time for commercial and industrial purposes including as a gas station; and WHEREAS, because of said use, concentrations of certain chemical constituents in the groundwater beneath the property legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, (the "Property") may exceed Class I groundwater quality standards for potable resource groundwater as set forth in 35 Illinois Administrative Code 620 or Tier 1 remediation objectives as set forth in 35 Illinois Administrative Code 742; and WHEREAS,the United City of Yorkville desires to limit potential threats to human health from groundwater contamination while facilitating the redevelopment and productive use of the property that is the source of said chemical constituents; and WHEREAS,the United City of Yorkville desires to accomplish these goals by prohibiting the use of groundwater as a potable water supply from the Property legally described in Exhibit A generally described as 802 South Bridge Street and the adjacent right-of-way of Orange Street and as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That the above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part hereof. Section 2. Use of groundwater as a potable water supply prohibited. The use or attempt to use groundwater as a potable water supply from within the area shown on Exhibit B by the installation or drilling of wells or by any other method is prohibited, including at points of withdrawal by the United City of Yorkville. The limited groundwater ordinance area includes the property associated with the area legally described in Exhibit A, including PIN#05- 38-479-001, and a portion of the right-of-way of Orange Street which adjoins the subject property as shown on Exhibit B. Section 3. Penalties Any person violating the provisions of this Ordinance shall be subject to a fine of up to S 1000.00 for each violation. Section 4. Definitions "Person" is any individual, partnership, co-partnership, firm, company, limited liability company, corporation, association,joint stock company, trust, estate, political subdivision, or any other legal entity, or their legal representatives, agents, or assigns. "Potable Water" is any water used for human or domestic consumption, including but not limited to, water used for drinking, bathing, swimming, washing dishes, or preparing foods. Section 5. Repealer All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed insofar as they conflict with this Ordinance. Section 6. Severability If any provision of this Ordinance or its application to any person or under any circumstances is adjudged invalid, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or of any portion not adjudged invalid. Section 7. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , 2011. CITY CLERK ROSE SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON, JR. JACQUELYN MILSCHEWSKI CHRIS FUNKHOUSER MARTY MUNNS CARLO COLOSIMO LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2011. MAYOR Exhibit A Lot 1 of Johnson &Hughes Subdivision, being a subdivision of part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian, recorded July 13, 1959 and documented in Bristol Township Book 6 and stored in hanging file 129B of the Kendall County Recorder's Office, and commonly known as 802 South Bridge Street in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois and also that part of the public right-of-way of Orange Street immediately adjacent to and north of said Lot 1. I I Gl f 5HCJf' ' a' � I a' 102' 1 z�w '-I 15 F F-� % —� I EGEN� OAS LM 6 Q • • +� —SAN,— SANTFARY SEIVEA -iT • a�ur. —w— wAiER lA1E f tip. b f X �''� __4NE__ OVtIIH M MECTM f a< ti— PL— PROPEM LIFE lE TEU"ONX UNE jr � vorpl Fit f IDpQ Q } 7t + ® IIYITED fiYV OROIFANCf {f Y &.'ri., G224 AIT,CI.�ZAf2'LI:G' S11E]M 7UE-ST y c ♦SUL WNW-M � � �WICaItl110 MGL-1111 i •11yamCrbt AM M WLL Vint 1 cam 1F- Pr. Exhibit B 80z.�G+� Bxa'dga.S"C.�aaC aRO�crNrJafr� �� _ Ytrkvilla M�eC� Z. s5Ko (;E�C ��' lAte1AN6Y.ML" PRPJ.B'C?'N0. '� x(I rAaa►dant No, 24MO7.00 xFvrs veY Xr P=4' xnc# amoawzs !Environmental gaup ICJ WE n �`� srT'mow sc4rr: p�,�p' ow,AV. P.O. Box 360 1 6295 East IL Highway 15 Woodlawn, IL 62898 tf 800.372.8740 + p 618.241.8000 f 618.735.2907 www.unitedscience.com August 24,2007 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Bureau of Land Division of Remediation,Management LUST Section 1021 North Grand Avenue East Springfield, IL 62794-9276 Re: LPC#0930255026e�G�GL YorkviTe- aGI r hon 802 South Bridge-STRW Yorkville,IL 60560 LUST Incident No.20060740 -LUST Technical File USI rolect To whom it may concern: Enclosed please find one (1) original and one (1) copy of the 45 day Addendum & an Authorization for Submittal for the above referenced site. I appreciate your time and consideration. If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter please contact me at(618)241-8033. Sincerely yours, UNITED SCIENCE WDUSTRIES, INC. RECEIVED C"K AUG 2 7 2007 Michele Chesnek �� PB�- Project Manager Enclosures S E P 06 2007 REVIEWER QUID I I 45-DAY REPORT ADDENDUM Yorkville Marathon 802 South Bridge Street Yorkville, IL, 60560 IIEMA# 20060740 I USI Project No. #1806015 I ` June 2007 I Prepared for: Yorkville Marathon 802 South Bridge Street Yorkville, IL 60560 I REGrNE® I Prepared by: AUG 2 7 2007 United Science Industries, Inc. IEPA/SOL 6295 East IL Hwy 15 P.O. Box 360 Woodlawn, Illinois 62898 RELEASABLE SEP 06 2001 REVIEWER MIS i TheAgency is aultwrized to require this Infoo,, don under Section 4 and Title XVI of the Emirenmental ProtedlwrArt(4151LCS 5(4,5157-57,17).Failure to disclose UdsiNOrrnation may result in a rdwtl penalty of not to exceed 1150,000.001orthe violation and an additional cM penalty of not to exceed$10,000.00 for each day dung vffkh the Madan Continues (415 ILLS 5142).Any person Mho knowingly makes a false material stalemer6 or representation In any label,manifest,record,report penult,or kense,or other document flied, mWntairwd or used for the purpose of compliance wkh Tillie XVI commits a pass 4 felony.Any asoond or subsequent of erm after conviction hereunder Is a C2ess 3 felony(4151LCS 5157.17).This form has been approved by the Forme Management Center. Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program 45-Day Report A. Site Identification IEMA Incident#(6-or B-digit): 20060740 IEPA LPC#(10-digit): 0930255026 Site Name: Yorkville Marathon I Site Address(Not a P.O. Box): 802 South Bridge Street City: Yorkville County: Kendall ZIP Code: 60560 Leaking UST Technical File B. Release Information UST Material Stored Release Type of Release Product Tank Status Volume in UST Yes/No Tank Leak/Overfill/ removed? Repaired/Removed/ (gallons) Piping Leak Yes/No Abandoned/In Use ( 4,000.0 gasoline yes Tank Leak yes Removed I 4,000.0 gasoline yes Tank Leak yes Removed I 2,000.0 diesel yes Tank Leak yes Removed 2,000.0 gasoline yes Tank Leak yes Removed 1 C. Early Action G a y ct on I 1. Does this report demonstrate that the most stringent Tier 1 RECE NED remediation objectives have been met? Yes❑ No AfJG 2 7 2007 2. Was free product encountered? Yes❑ No m If yes,the owner or operator must submit a Free IEPr-or30L Product Removal Report(form LPC 504). If free product removal will be conducted for more than 45 days,a Free I Product Removal Plan(and budget, if applicable)must be submitted(form LPC 504). 3- Have any fire or safety hazards posed by vapors or free product or contamination to a potable water supply been identified? Yes ❑ No IIL 532 2277 45-Day Report LPC 503 Rev.March 2006 1 of 4 4. What was the volume of backfill material excavated? 0.0 yds3 5. What was the volume of native soil excavated? 0.0 yds3 6. Was groundwater encountered at the site? Yes❑ No 7. Did the groundwater exhibit a sheen? Yes❑ No m D. Site/Release Information Provide the following: 1. Data on the nature and estimated quantity of release; 2. Data from available sources or site investigations concerning the following factors: a. Surrounding populations; b. Water quality; C. Use and approximate locations of wells potentially affected by the release; d. Subsurface soil conditions; I e. Location of subsurface sewers; f. Climatological conditions;and g. Land use; 1 3. A discussion of what was done to measure for the presence of a release where contamination was most likely to be present at the UST site; 4. The results of the free product investigations; 11 5. A discussion of the action taken to prevent further release of the regulated substance into the environment; 6. A discussion of the action taken to monitor and mitigate Sire and safety hazards posed by vapors or free product that has migrated from the UST excavation zone and entered subsurface structures;and ` T. Any other information collected while performing initial abatement measures pursuant to 35 111.Adm.Code 731.162, 732.202(b),or 734.210(b). E. Other Information Provide the following: 1. An area map showing the site in relation to surrounding properties; RECCEVIED I 2. A cross section,to scale, showing the UST(s)and the excavation; AUG 2 7 2047 3. Analytical/screening results in tabular format including the results of soil samples required pursuant to 35 III.Adm. Code 732.202(h)or 734.210(h)and the most stringent Tier 1 1EFAIZOL ( remediation objectives; f 4. Site map meeting the requirements of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 732.110(a)or 734.440 and ` including sample locations; f 5. Soil boring logs; 45-Day Report 2 of 4 I 6. Chain of custody forms; T. Laboratory analytical reports; 8. Laboratory certifications; 9. A copy of the Office of the State Fire Marshal Permit for Removal,Abandonment-in-Place, or other OSFM permits or notifications; to. A narrative of tank removal and cleaning operations;describe how wastes generated during the tank removal were managed, treated, and disposed of; 11. Photographs of UST removal activities and the excavation;and 12. Copies of manifests for soil and groundwater transported off-site. IF. Early Action Tier 1 Remediation Objectives Compliance Report I tf the most stringent Tier 1 remediation objectives of 35 Ill.Adm.Code 742 for the applicable indicator contaminants have been met and a groundwater investigation is not required, in addition to the information provided above, provide the following: 1. Site characterizatlon; 2. If water was encountered in the excavation, provide a demonstration pursuant to 35111. I Adm. Code 732.202(h)(4)(C)or 734.210(h)(4)(C)that it is not representative of actual groundwater,and 3. Property Owner Summary(form LPC 568). ` G. Signatures UST Owner or Operator Signature: REUIVt® All plans,budgets,and reports must be signed by the owner or operator and list the owner's or operator's full name,address,and telephone number. AUG 2 7 2007 1 UST Owner or Operator and Licensed Professional Engineer or Licensed Professional Geologist ICertification of Stage 1 Site Investigation Plan and Budget(applies to Part 734 sites contind(ac ` BOL beyond early action): Pursuant to 35111.Adm. Code 734.315(b)and 734.310(b), 1 certify that the Stage 1site investigation will be conducted in accordance with 35 W.Adm. Code 734.395 and that the costs of the Stage 9 site investigation will not exceed the amounts set forth in 35111.Adm.Code 734.Subpart H,Appendix D, and Appendix E. This certification is intended to meet the requirements for a plan and budget for the Stage 1 site investigation required to be submitted pursuant to 35 Ili.Adm.Code 734.315 and 734.310. A summary of the actual costs for conducting the Stage 1 site investigation will be submitted concurrently with the results of the Stage 1 site investigation and the Stage 2 site investigation plan and budget. Continue onto next page. 45-Day Report 3 of 4 Licensed Professional Engineer or Licensed Professional Geologist Certification: I certify under penalty of law that all activities that are the subject of this plan, budget,or report were conducted under my supervision or were conducted under the supervision of another Licensed Professional Engineer or Licensed Professional Geologist and reviewed by me;that this plan, budget, or report and all attachments were prepared under my supervision;that to the best of my knowledge and belief,the work described in this plan,budget,or report has been completed in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act 1415 ILCS 5),35 Ill.Adm. Code 731,732, or 734, and generally accepted standards and practices of my profession;and that the information presented is accurate and complete. I am aware there are significant penalties for submitting false statements or reprosentations to the Illinois EPA, including but not limited to fines,imprisonment,or both as provided in Sections 44 and 57.17 of the Environmental Protection Act[415 ILCS 5/44 and 57.171. UST Owner or Operator Consultant Name: Yorkville Marathon Company; United Science Industries IContact: Jennifer Dart Contact Michele Peterson Address: 802 South 13ridge Street Address: PO Box 360 City: Yorkville City: Woodlawn State: Illinois She: pllnois ZIP Code: 60560 ZIP Code: 62898 Phone: (630)553-7080 Phone: (618)735-2411 Signature:$ Signature: I Date: " Date: rO �` D C5 P?ECE)VEla Licensed Professional Engineer or Geologist L.P.E. or L.P.G. Seal AUG 2 Nauss: Joseph M. Kelly 7 Z��7 ��aaaaaaaatagaQ Company: United Science Industries �a`e HNSOL Address: PO Box 360 ° °°°° City: WoodlawnQa° s��-042135 Q State: Illinois a RMgiEt�ED s gRpFESS )HPIL o ZIP Code: 62898 s o rgKGINEER °� Phone: (618_)735-2411 °• OF •.�,�`��`~• IU. Registra ' No.: 62-042135 ItIN04/,```. License xpir tion Dat : 11/3!1/07 Signatur . Date: 45-Day Report 4 of 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS D. SITE INFORMATION 1. Nature and Estimated Quantity of the Release 1 ' 2. Data from Available Sources or Site Investigations 2 Concerning the Following Factors: a. Surrounding Populations 2 b. Water Quality 2 c. Use and Approximate Locations of Wells Potentially Affected by the Release 3 d. Subsurface Soil Conditions 3 e. Location of Subsurface Sewers 3 f. Climatological Conditions 3 g. Land Use 3 3. Presence of a Release 4 4. Free Product Investigation 4 S. Actions Taken to Prevent Further Release 4 6. Actions Taken to Mitigate Fire and Safety Hazards 4 7. Compliance with 35 Illinois Administrative Code 734,210(b) 4 E. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 5 I1. Area Map 5 2. Cross Section 5 3 Analytical Results 5 4. Site Map 5 5. Soil Boring Logs 5 6. Chain of Custody Forms 5 7. Laboratory Analytical Reports 5 8. UST Information 5 I 9. OSFM Permit for Removal 5 10. UST Removal and Cleaning Operations 6 11. Photographic Documentation 6 12. Manifests 6 E i I TABLE OF CONTENTS(Continued) TABLE 1: Early Action Analytical Summary TABLE 2: UST Information FIGURE 1: Area Map FIGURE 2: Tankhold Cross Section Map ' FIGURE 3: Site Map FIGURE 4: Topographic Map FIGURE 5A: 200'Private Potable Well Map FIGURE 5B: 2500' CWS Well Map APPENDIX A: Laboratory Reports, Chain of Custody Forms, Lab Certifications ' APPENDIX B: Soil Boring Logs APPENDIX C: OSFM Removal Permit APPENDIX D: Photographic Documentation ' APPENDIX E: Manifests (Backfill Tickets) APPENDIX F: Source Water Assessment Program Fact Sheets ii. 45-DAY REPORT-ADDENDUM Yorkville Marathon IEMA#2006-0740 D. SITE INFORMATION I. Nature and Estimated Quantity of the Release There were a total of three (3) Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) removed from the site; two (2) 4,000 gallon gasoline UST's and one (1) 4,000 gallon two-compartment UST which contained 2,000 gallons of gasoline and 2,000 gallons of diesel fuel. According to the OSFM, the 4,000 gallon two (2) compartment UST is considered to be two (2) ' separate tanks. The owner of the property located at 802 South Bridge Street in Yorkville, Illinois contracted United Science Industries, Inc. (USI) to perform a preliminary site investigation. Hand-augered soil borings were advanced in the area of the tankhold and encountered backfill with obvious petroleum odor and staining, A photoionization detector confirmed the presence of volatile organics. The release was reported to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA) on June 15, 2006 and was assigned Incident Number 2006-0740. The release is suspected to have occurred from both, the gasoline and diesel tanks; therefore the indicator contaminants and associated TACO Tier I Residential Cleanup Objectives (CUOs) are those of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbezene, Xylenes (BTEX), Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE), and Polynuclear Axomatics (PNAs). The A pp lication for Removal of Underground Storage Tanks was submitted to the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) on June 21, 2006. On August 16, 2006 OSFM Permit 03205-2006REM was issued by the OSFM. On September 19, 2006, Big Muddy Services (Contractor License 4 IL002347), in the presence of the OSFM representative, removed the abovementioned USTs that were located at the Yorkville Marathon LUST site. Perched water was pumped from the tankhold area after the tanks were removed and decommissioned. The tankhold was backfilled with the excavated original backfill and CA-6 rock (obtained from Felts Sand and Gravel Company in Elburn, IL). On a separate occasion, wall and floor samples were taken from the tankhold area using direct push technology by a truck-mounted drill rig. Early Action sampling locations were designed in accordance with 35 45-Day Report Addendurn Yorkville Service Station#20060740 Page 2 IAC 734.210. Six (6) floor samples were taken (F-1, F-2, F-3, F-4, F-5, &F-6), two (2) at the base of each former tank location, at a depth of 9- 10 feet. A Wall Sample was taken at a depth of 5-6 feet for every 20 feet of wall length for a total of six (6) wall samples (W-1, W-2, W-3, W4, W-5, & W-6). The backfM was sampled once for every 100 cubic yards located in the tankhold for a total of five(5)backfill samples (BF-1, BF-2, BF-3, BF-4, & BF-5). One (1) sample was collected as representative of the pump island and piping system location (PI-1). The pump islands were located directly above the UST tankhold. The sample taken from this location was sampled at a depth of 3-4 feet. All samples were sent to an accredited laboratory and tested for the presence of BTEX, MTBE, & PNAs. Sample results revealed exceedences of TACO Tier I Residential CUOs at the following locations: Floor sample, F-1; Wall samples, W-4& W- 5; Backfill samples, BF-4 & BF-5; & Pump Island sample, PI-1. All backfill samples exhibited elevated soil screening PID readings. All contaminated backfill placed in the excavation should be considered for removal. Some soil samples may not indicate elevated contaminate levels due to the excavation and aeration of soils prior to placing in excavation. A Stage 1 Site Investigation will be conducted in order to identify the location and concentration of contamination surrounding and extending out from the tankhold, piping system, and former pump island locations. f2. Data from Available Sources or Site Investigations Concerning the Following Factors: a. Surrounding Population The Yorkville Marathon property is located at 802 South Bridge Street in the community of Yorkville, Illinois. Yorkville has an estimated population of 10,800 residents. The site is surrounded by commercial and residential properties and is located on the southeast corner of Route 47(S. Bridge Street) and Orange Street. b. Water Quality To date, USI has obtained no evidence indicating the release has impacted groundwater quality. Groundwater was not encountered during tank removal activities. The location of the groundwater table will be investigated during Stage 1 Site Investigation. 1 45-Day Report Addendum Yorkville Service Station#20060740 Page 3 c. Use and Approximate Locations of Wells Potentially Affected by the Release. To date, USI has found no evidence indicating the release has impacted any nearby public or private water supply well. Source Water Assessment program(SWAP) was used to locate all public and private wells, which includes information from Illinois State Geological Survey, Illinois State Water Survey, Illinois Department of Public Health, and IEPA Bureau of Water. One (1) Community Water Supply (CWS) well was found at a distance of 1,795 feet from the subject site. The potential impact as a result of the release will be investigated during the site investigation, if necessary. No private potable water wells were found within a radius of 200 feet around the Yorkville Marathon rLUST site. The SWAP fact sheets were reviewed concerning the potable water source for the Village of Yorkville and were confirmed as being accurate by a Yorkville village official. d. Subsurface Soil Conditions rThe subsurface soil conditions were investigated in and around the tankhold and piping system revealing exceedences above the ' TACO Tier I CUOs for residential properties. C. Location of Subsurface Sewer ' To date, the owner of the subject site has not observed anything suggesting that this release has impacted nearby subsurface sewers. Subsurface utilities were located before the USTs were removed from the site, a further investigation of the utilities as migratory pathways may be necessary as part of site investigation. ' f. Climatological Conditions The climate on September 19, 2006 was clear in the morning changing to partly cloudy in the early afternoon. There were no apparent conditions that affected the UST removal activities. g. Land Use The property was formerly a fuel station and is now an automotive repair shop. 45-Day Report Addendum Yorkville Service Station#20060740 Page 4 1 3. Presence of a Release A hand augered soil boring was advanced near the USTs and encountered backfill with obvious petroleum staining and odor. A photoionization detector (PID) confirmed the presence of volatile organic contaminants. On September 19, 2006 during tank removal activities, a waste characterization sample (WC-1) was taken at a depth of two feet(2) and revealed exceedences of the TACO Tier I Residential CUOs. Wall, floor, pump island, and backfill samples from the tankhold also revealed exceedences of the applicable CUOs. 4. Free Product Investigations The preliminary investigation and tank removal did not indicate the Npresence of free product. 5. Actions Taken to Prevent Further Release ' The Application for Removal of Underground Storage Tanks was I submitted to the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) on June 21, 2006. On August 16, 2006 OSFM Permit 01205-2006REM was issued by the OSFM. The USTs were removed on September 19, 2006 in the presence of an OSFM representative. All of the UST's affiliated with the site were removed, decommissioned, cleaned,and properly disposed of 6. Actions Taken to Mitigate Fire and Safety Hazards Neither United Science Industries, Inc. nor Yorkville Marathon noted fire or safety hazards resulting from the release. Big Muddy Services (BMS) has IFCI Certification and followed OSFM guidelines to diminish fire and safety hazards. 7. Compliance With 35 Illinois Administrative Code 734.210(b) The EPA received the `Notice of Release' on June 20, 2006. The Application for Removal of Underground Storage Tanks was submitted to the Office of the State Fire Marshal(OSFM) on June 21, 2006. A 20- Day Report was sent to the Agency and received on July 6, 2006. The 45-Day Report was sent to the Agency and received on August 9, 2006. The time period for early action activities was extended until December 28, 2006. On August 16, 2006 OSFM Permit 01205-2006REM was issued by the OSFM. The USTs were removed on September 19, 2006. 45-Day Report Addendum Yorkville Service Station#20060740 Page 5 E. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION 1. Area Map Refer to Figure 1. 2. Cross Section Refer to Figure 2. 3. Analytical Results Early Action investigation analytical results of the tankhold and piping system are included herein as Appendix A. A summary of the results in tabular form is included herein as Table 1. 4. Site Map ' Refer to Figure 3. S. Soil Boring Logs Refer to Appendix B for soil borings logs. 6. Chain of Custody Forms Chain of Custody forms and Laboratory Certifications are included with the laboratory reports in Appendix A. 7. Laboratory Analytical Reports Refer to Appendix A. 8. UST Information A summary of the UST information is included as Table 2. 9. OSFM Permit for Removal Refer to Appendix C for a copy of the OSFM Removal Permit. 1 45-Day Report Addendum Yorkville Service Station#20060740 Page 6 10. UST Removal and Cleaning Operations The UST's were removed, decommissioned, and cleaned in accordance with the International Fire Code Institute codes and standards upon the scheduling of the event. An OSFM Tank Specialist was on-site to observe the UST cleaning and disposal operations. Big Muddy Services' personnel are licensed as UST decommissioning and removal contractors (TL-002347). When aeration of the UST achieved the OSFM accepted %LEL, the UST was removed from the tankhold, cleaned and transported to a local scrap metal dealer for recycling. 11. Photographic Documentation Refer to Appendix D for Photographic Documentation, 12. Manifests Contaminated soil was not disposed of during tank removal activities. CA-6 rock was obtained from Felts Sand and Gravel Company, Inc. in I Elburn, IL to fill the tankhold after removal of the USTs along with the original backfill. Copies of the CA-6 backfill tickets are located in Appendix E. f 1 Site: Yorkville Marathon Incident No. 20060740 LPC No.: 0930255026 Site Address: 802 South Bridge Street Early Action Confirmation Sample-Analytical Results TABLE 1 Soil Analytical Summary (Re ASd in b) Sample m I Sample-Depth Date Benzene Eth (benzene MTBE Toluene Total X lenes TACO Tier I Residential Most Stringent Cleanup Objectives 30 13,000 320 1211100 51W PI-1 3-4' 5/9/2007 136 3070 3.05 28 157 F-1 9-10' 519/2007 2.81 2.81 8.56 2.81 8.42 F-2 8.5-9.5' 518/2007 2.83 2.83 44.1 2.83 8.48 F-3 9-10' 5/8/2007 2.87 2.87 2.87 2.87 8.61 F4 9-10' 5/8/2007 617 6030 226 226 9300 F-5 9-10' 5/8/2007 2.96 2.96 2.96 2.96 8.87 F-6 9-10' 5/8/2007 2.7 2.7 29.1 17 8.09 BF-1 7-8' 5/8/2007 3.36 9.81 3.36 3.36 14.5 BF-2 7-8' 518/2007 3.18 115 3.18 3.18 47A BF-3 7-8' 5/8/2007 20 83.6 3.92 7&9 260 BF-4 7-8' 5182007 121 817 3.12 29A 291 BF-5 7-8' 5/82007 156 310 3.17 22.5 123 W-1 5-6 51912007 2.94 2.94 2.94 2.94 8.8 W-2 5-6' 5/9/2007 3.01 3.01 3.01 3.01 9.0 W-3 6-7' 5/9/2007 3.26 3.26 3.26 3.26 9.8 W-4 6-7' 5/9/2007 908 143 2.81 65.6 38.5 W-5 4-5' 5!42007 77.4 24.7 2.85 3.79 8.55 W-6 4-5' 582007 15.5 2.8 2.6 J 2.8 8.4 Bold numbers are actual quantities above the reporting lirrtlt. PI-PUMP ISLANC Numbers not bold indicate results less than the reporting limit. The reporting limit is shown. F-FLOOR *)Reporting limit exceeds the most stringent TACO Tier 1 residential clean-up objective BF-BACKFILL SHADING -Exceeds the most stringent TACO 17er 1 residential clean-up objective W-WALL the: Yorkville Marathon incident No. 20060740 LPC No.: 0930256026 Site Address: 802 South Bridge Street Early Action ConflmwWon Sample-Anelytical Results TABLE 1-Continued Soil Analytical Summary (Reported in ppb) Ae lop 4P vo TACO Tier 1 Residential Most � ,� � � w stringent Objectives C7eamw rE�� PI-I 34 5!9!2007 954 524 524 7 12 8.74 40.5 8.74 79.5 15.9 524 111 23 524 524 143 F-1 9-10' 519/2,07 965 531 531 7 12,1 8,85 41 8.85 80.4 16.1 531 113 23.3 531 531 145 F-2 8.5.9.5 5/8!1007 960 528 528 7 12 8.8 40.8 8.8 So 16 528 112 23.2 528 528 144 F-3 9-IW 519f2007 941 518 518 7 11.8 8.63 40 8.63 78.4 15.7 Sig 110 22.7 518 518 141 F4 9-10' 5/8/2007 996 549 549 7 12.5 9.13 42.3 9.13 83 16.6 548 116 24.1 679 548 149 F-5 910 518!1007 988 544 544 7 12.4 9.06 42 9.06 82.4 16,5 544 115 k22.4 544 544 148 F-6 9-101 5WOW 926 509 509 7 11,6 8.49 39.4 8,49 77.2 15.4 509 108 509 509 139 BF-1 7-8' 5/8!2007 995 492 492 6 11.2 8.21 38 8.21 74.6 14.9 492 104 492 492 134 BF-2 7-8' 5/8/1007 904 497 497 7 11.3 8.28 38.4 8.28 75.3 15.1 497 105 497 497 136 BF-3 74 9B/2007 859 473 473 6 10.7 7.88 36.5 7.88 71.6 14 473 100 20.8 473 473 129 BF-4 74 5(6!2007 864 475 475 6 10.8 7.92 36.7 7,92 72 14 475 101 20.9 475 415 130 BF-5 7-8' 5/8/2007 H93 466 486 6 11 11A 37.5 8.1 73,6 IS 486 103 21.4 496 486 133 W-1 5-6' W2007 952 523 523 7 11.9 8.72 40.4 8.72 79.3 16 523 111 23 523 523 143 W-2 S-6' 5!9!2007 991 545 545 7 12,4 9.09 42.1 9.09 82,6 17 545 116 24 545 545 149 W-3 6-7' SNf1007 978 538 538 7 122 8.96 41.6 8.96 81.5 16.3 538 114 23.6 538 539 147 W-4 6-7' S,W2007 954 525 525 7 11.9 8.75 40.5 101 79.5 15.9 525 111 23.1 525 525 143 W-5 4-S SJ9/2007 958 527 527 7 12 8.78 40.7 8.78 79.8 16 527 112 23.2 527 527 144 W-6 4S 519(1007 954 525 525 7 11.9 8.75 40,6 8.75 49.5 15.9 525 111 23.1 525 525 143 Bold ttatobers ere actual gttaadHes abore the t+e "dng Ihn1L Pl-PUMP ISLAND Numbers not bold indicate results less than the reporting limit. The reporting limit is shown. F-FLOOR •Reporting limit exceeds the most stringent TACO'Pier 1 residential clean-.UP objective BF-BACKFILL ,SHADING.--Excped the most slrirmw TACO.Tier 1 residential_clean-up objective W-WALL TABLE 2 UST Information UST Material Product Volume Stored Incident No. Removed? Tank Status 49000 Gasoline 20060740 Yes Removed on 9/16/06 49000 Gasoline 20060740 Yes Removed on 9/16/06 x`2,000 Diesel 20060740 Yes Removed on 9/16106 *2,000 Gasoline 120060740 Yes Removed on 9/16106 *A two-compartment 4,000 gallon tank. l„ P kt ko Ti 61 Y r +i y k fw WNW L — r i ra„ ] i i � 400kIXa ��sr 1 I I I �-T1 - L I �S 4K TANKS- Mil ml clwlcrElobfl� � s�crra�v�-n I l t LU -K -K -K -K -K -W -K -K -)r -X -K ` ti I °�f II I 3d ICJ L J N 3 3 n ® # I a e c N N c O en l� �t•'7� ,� f V , Lam{ ..J tl •r `��i r �^ �,..��•" � r� �,__ s sJacT .t •4 � �jjG ",�it�. .7 � �,.�r'. 11 '� r Jl��'�. ': � , a ''�`,�''•`�S is � � � �f—. �• I `�' / ti i a fiv fin sn= 4+t� III �■ �� r} f Il' O •f y � ~ r ' w mow: r t• 5 IX r { r '�+,t; ,ri' s� 15 Nlb►y yq. to � •. w. X15$ly`,� � ? "•''�� '`�"�r _ O r to lu I � sty. �.�pRAUL ST 'Q3.m;" ti.�,�hi• f '�`f�j`„ =,� (44 'S?�L , rte_ jl �¢Y_ �• w - _ o to yYyy �i 7 !. ^: �� Li, .. _��:', , ,�, � �LL5' �+ . •.!'��/ hP�i !� rte' � ,-� M m U mm IL L C Ill .7 r c A J (A S rn to 0 1 r ~ Z 2 U p LLf 3: pyLL w Ilq LU N A' C r1I i5 Si18 15 SI15(1�FI � U t Lw a �•i 0 t o r �7 I-S CO3 NA ut Jt Se h W in G7 O y y W a y M m N o ' cQ ! In v yam• W p MOM Ln C:l 01 { o ri N p o F.' 1BNlypS 'iSNMq$ �y-.. If F1 1S NM9 S""�^15 WhM1V 5 J � 15 NMq g-- H � LL 1531b16^^� 3 ss 3syss 3 F 1S 31b1$�1$31y� A m 4 4A �co `o) 3 gv,aoy,t....1S�bw�isNylaab^+ "1S NYfl a0h � g y � u ® ? m } on �m Stimr �'! w I— Ar tg H 3 H a ¢ Um G4 dE on 4 4 x `�a g w o. � 8 cis LU LU Oak ry 3001 tie N-9 Y(yl � 1p r Q G C 87'—6 Ad co � � a W �� 'w � in r M ( - G •Ij I� � �-+ v t8, 18 SI.45f4�F1 "-` n I �ft� \ � '� on.rn in G w Cz 9AS3t3 i.^7T t� 3 v in O z nom. rs ;,y l c�v cn tin raw C C�� Cr C7 � '.�` •~r .,•,ti ups tt � a. �°,� � G N y, �.SNII'i�,6 lsf+llv►YS--'rn-�_cpa--'_.�... ��.�,._.1-r-- �o l o oro� 4 CL 10 44 bM D v$P� RYA o E POPLAR OR N a •� o r APPENDIX A Laboratory Reports, Chain of Custody, Laboratory Certifications ' •• " - ., : .• • , ' '...., , , • • ., "'' .' . :t:.7estira�j Laborefory-- �1'15,':I,N C O R F•O�R A t E D' . ` ; ; • `, , 1210 Capital'Airport Drive' r )]pil . , •.Springii6W,tHlh6s621,07, ,Mr: Kilt$ Phone: 217-7534114$ ; United Sciertoe Eidustries.' " • _ �. ' i Fa*,-217453,4152 PQ Box 360. :wwiv prairiesnaiytica�.6b6, 6295'Fast'Atinois High�iay;15. �Woodlawn;-I,-.62898. RE: Yorkville Marathon.?Project 180601$ PAS Ordcr No.:076508$: Dear-Mr.•Dan King: ' NaiiieAnalytieg Systems;liic.received 18 samples'on.5/91200' 3:45:00 FM far:tho analyses prESelitodin the followingrepo..ft.. All:appliceble quatity control'prooedUres"met method.sp-mr-fie acceptance criteria. . ; 'Tlais.jreport shall rot be.reproduced, exeepYin'Aill;without the prior written consent of Prairie• . Analyfcal'Systems,'1no. • .. �. : • = • •. , • ' If you have'•any qucstyons,plcse feel free;to;call me at(217)753-1145. Sincere t Projod Mann m apm C`4 LO ul U?. - �` a ' � �' � `� : t• � � � � as �• 1, � W � • C7 Q T t � Ilu ■ 4n �i 1pou m 3 d w CU up W 7 �ry4ai W 1 Elo a, 4 , ' V. 14! �. f i 9S g � A 44)" w I CL ► A 4 _ uj LLI o � Q a vi �1 uu Tb« page care be contplatod.onOns. T�r+yt�,�ir•.�iNrd�al tall y,pha d41..�fgaf�6ti q+eMC��+l�nA Tie xYf rrrdK F..in�w+41 nr,lci��fLCS•a44��,-:f7:i'JkindcRlwrsat.�tr,r„r�, �►�I c#Yf t per. a3 c�aa�lQYi tie qat�a!'i �elt.lti�d*I�pa�+�ct`��co.. r�1� R}+r�lcr 9l �++`+ia4�1!a�e��M t!?L•'!✓r#I#�„Aet+a . elma� aim Atr.mMeni��Fw M!ICprFkcttiClM mwcnit". PMg"*q,*( ' caeul lA��rfd+]"dt�7�Ydt+dm11M71r tf�k.►}t r��cp•1war uF4t �rre rkooftlnbeAere h,iAi�tOf�.tr�br4�l� 7t.G ilsR.E'7) Ttml��a�. e+gpmvsd •.P�rtni#tilia+l Ctrs 2nviron nentol: tection Agency ' Leaking Underground Storage T=k Pr*9r Laborotory Cartilication for�C.'he�iCa7�aJ�y�is (J WA- CI, w k/ Site AddrM ow. k M,tiA,aou): • 1 . g,: I c�ur�ty �,� � :.ita 1.L- ZIP Cad=. I ' ,B. So�nple C ��ectoo�• 1 I cordry I is vbm xnenia.va smears, UZI--� 2, .of-custody Oooe dame were-followed in dao,fief& ways�intuinrod•by I�F��'es�`4fii ��. l 4, AU-des PrOPcriY 1"3bcZed. (�a� c Lawratory Representadve f + • j u-fj j_ propu cba,irl-of cusWdy procedinw wcro Wowed as aoc��moted on tho�—O ctsswdy Tb= ; . Stele 1 .ed by pxpc r j)MOzMA GOn. svrrr pj%wei-propcHy 1ab*W tech t_ �iaa�tti �� tL 5:�1f,# ,iir¢Pprc3r°w tr�rci7yc�atic�n Fa„ sa�iie ,l h�nalyss This, . o.can bo"camp : }; ut��ass;�: er'ctiiro 'procedures establishod and c ukd out . ., . . ',• •, , . {initial}° S. San�p�c�c1di��tines w�riotexc�c]ed: • . ��= 6. SW-846 Analytical Labaratozy k tive�ased for tlic an-raysc:s. •• , (�,itist� 7. An diW.)ab poebM- ed quintitat iv anolysis, teat d ,� .. ids i ed in 33 ai, 19 6A SO(for sus Plce cc]]� ed cm ar� r 7: Si atti thAt alp intro-nodon contaited ig •fann is true =d ac=atc t+o the bm-of MY, ' . I bftcby s� cant pc�alti&j for ro6�avit iilce ifOxzaaficin k �'Icd�e.andb�d: I am avti+aa��tt~•t}iGrc'e arcs �� $' > includ >~;tba posst'b�'tity offuw and impiiso=wiit fig 3 wvAnS%6oIadopsa _ - sample C61lect6r Ilhxv�roftomtal Tocbnlciz Tln:Lred Seater In Company= . 'A�a�ss: �.0� Box 36t? ' ' a ' ' ' • ' . Gi State, ZIP: Wbodlawn,L •62 98 > (628) 735--2411 a Laiborsdory Reprep f iktive _ D ate. �o�nt� r � ,,..r.v-•�7..._. �• ��."'�, ;r.' i � -.s��....;�.-�"'ti'` 1 .. .•..V - - 1 ,�tja�a-SS; t tom• l '�t�,-i��:.� !`�i �•'�•�. - ..y�• tC1 .f'`._��...r.. . tia4a�a:•Y:..�aa ~1i�� all,111 i3iY..: n%1a ICY a7�d ' • ' Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc. Date: 18-May-07 ' CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 ' Lab ID: 0705088-001 Collection Date: 5/8/2007 3:10:00 PM Client Sample ID: F-1 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed 1 SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW35508) Analyst: DPM Acensphthene U 865 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM ' Acenaphthylene U 531 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 8:23:00 PM Anthracene U 531 pWYQ-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM Benzo(a)anthracaene U 7.00 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM Benzo(a)pyrene U 12.1 pg/t(q-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM Senzo(b)fluarenthene U 8.85 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM Benzo(g,hJ)perylene U 41.0 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 8.85 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM Chrysene U 80.4 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 823:00 PM Dlbenz(a,h)anthracene U 16.1 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM Fluoranthene U 531 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM Fluorene U 113 pg1Kg-dry 1 511112107 8:23:00 PM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 23.3 Vg ft-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM Naphthalene U 531 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:23:00 PM Phenanthrene U 531 UgIKg-dry 1 5/11/2007 823:00 PM I Pyrene U 145 pglKg dry 1 5/1112007 8:23:00 PM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: DPM Benzene U 2.81 pg/t(q-dry 1 5/11/2007 4:22:00 PM ' Ethylbenzene U 2.81 pgWQ-dry 1 5/11/2007 4:22:00 PM Methyl tert-butyl ether 8.56 2.81 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 4:22:00 PM Toluene U 2.81 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 4:22:00 PM Xylenes,Total U 8.42 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 4:22:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Molsture 14.8 0.01 Wt% 1 5/1012007 10:30:00 AM I IPage 1 of 19 Prairie Analytical Systems,Inc. Date: 18-May-07 CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1 806015 Lab ID: 0705088-002 Collection Date: 5/812007 3:45:00 PM Client Sample ID: F-2 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qua] Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW355081 Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 960 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 6:20:00 PM l Amnaphthylene U 528 pg/Kg-dry 1 5!1212007 6:20:00 PM IAnthrecene U 528 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 6:20:00 PM Benzo(a)anthracene U 6.96 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 6:20.00 PM Benzo(a)pyrene U 12.0 Irgft-dry 1 5/1212007 6:20:00 PM Benzo(b)fluoranthene U 8.80 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 6:20:00 PM Benzo(g,h,l)perylene U 40.8 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 6:20:00 PM Benzo(kMwranthene U 8.80 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12)2007 6:20:00 PM ` Chrysene U 80.0 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 6:20:00 PM IDlbenz(a,h)anthraoene U 16.0 pgmg-ft 1 002007 6:20:00 PM Fluoranthene U 528 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 6:20:00 PM Fluorene U 112 pg/Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 6:20A0 PM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 23.2 ug/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 6:20:00 PM Naphthalene U 528 ug/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 6:20:00 PM Phenanthrene U 528 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 6:20:00 PM Pyrene U 144 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 6:20A0 PM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: DPM Benzene U 2.83 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 6:02:00 PM Ethylbenzene U 2.63 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 6:02:00 PM Methyl tert-butyl ether 44.1 2.83 pg/Kg-&y 1 5111/2007 6:02:00 PM Toluene U 2.83 ug/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 6:02:00 PM Xylenes,Total U 8.48 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 6:02:00 PM IPERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS V2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Molsture 12.8 0.01 wt% 1 5/10/2007 10:30:00 AM I 1 IPage 2 of 19 Prairie Analytical Systems,Inc. Date: 18-May-07 ' CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 Lab ID: 0705088-003 Collection Date: 5/8/2007 4:15:00 PM Client Sample ID: F-3 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qaal Units DF Date Analyzed tSEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 941 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM ' Acenaphthylene U 518 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 8:53:00 PM Anthracene U 518 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM Benzo(a)anthracene U 6.82 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM Benzo(a)pyrene U 11.8 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM ' Benzo(b)fiuoranlhene U 8.63 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 8:53:00 PM Benzo(g,h,l)perylene U 40.0 pg/Kg-dry 1 511112007 8:53:00 PM Benzo(k)fiuoranthene U 8.63 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM Chrysene U 78.4 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM Dlbenz(s,h)anthraoene U 15.7 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM Fluoranthene U 518 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM Fluorene U 110 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM I Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrsne U 22.7 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM Naphthalene U 518 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:53:00 PM Phenanthrene U 518 pglKg-dry 1 511112007 8:53:00 PM Pyrene U 141 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 8:53:00 PM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: DPM Benzene U 2.87 jig/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 6.35:00 PM Ethylbenzene U 2.87 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 6:35:00 PM Methyl tort-butyl ether U 2.87 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 6:35:00 PM Toluene U 2.87 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 6:35:00 PM Xylenes,Total U 8.61 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 6:35:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 12.3 0.01 Wt% 1 5/10/2007 10:30:00 AM I Page 3 of 19 Prairie Analytical Systems,Inc. Date: 18-Ma)-07 ' CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 Lab ID: 0705088-004 Collection Date: 5/8/2007 4:20:00 PM Client Sample ID: BF-1 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qua] Units DF Date Analyzed ' SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW0270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Aoenaphthene U 895 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111!2007 9:23:00 PM ' Acenaphthylene U 492 pg/Kg-dry 1 6/1112W7 9:23:00 PM Anthracene U 492 pg/Kg-dry 1 511112007 9:23:00 PM Benzo(a)anthracens U 6.49 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:23:00 PM Benzo(a)pyrene U 11.2 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:23:00 PM ' Benzo(b)fluoraMhene U 8.21 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:23:00 PM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U 38.0 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:23:00 PM Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 8.21 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:23:00 PM Chrysene U 74.6 pg/Kg-dry 1 511112007 9:23:00 PM Dibenz(a,h)enthracene U 14.9 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:23:00 PM Ftuoranthens U 492 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:23:00 PM Fluorene U 104 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:23:00 PM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene V 21.6 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:23:00 PM Naphthalene U 492 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:23:00 PM Phenanthrene U 492 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:23:00 PM Pyrene U 134 pg/Kg-dry 1 511112007 9:23:00 PM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: DPM Benzene U 3.36 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 7:08:00 PM I Ethylbenzene 9.81 3.36 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 7:08:00 PM Methyl tort-butyl ether U 3.36 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/112007 7:08:00 PM Toluene U 3,36 pg/Kg-dry 1 511112007 7:08:00 PM Xylenes,Total 14.5 10.1 pg/K"ry 1 5111/2007 7:08:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 6.87 0.01 wt% 1 5/10/200710:30:00 AM I Page 4 of 19 Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc. Date: 18-Mzry-07 CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 ' Lab ID: 0705088-005 Collection Date: 5/8/2007 4:40:00 PM Client Sample ID: F4 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 996 pg/K9-dry 1 5/1112007 9:52:00 PM Acenaphthylene U 548 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 9:52:00 PM Anthraeene U 548 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM Benzo(a)anthracene U 7.22 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM Benzo(a)pyrene U 12.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM Benzo(b)11uoranthens U 9.13 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:52:00 PM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U 42.3 lig/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM Senzo(k)nuoranthene U 9.13 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 9:52:00 PM Chrysene U 83.0 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM Dibenz(a,h)anthracene U 16.6 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM Fluoranthene U 548 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM Fluorene U 116 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:52:00 PM Indeno(1,2,3-ed)pyrene U 24.1 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM Naphthalene 679 548 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM Phenanthrene U 548 WKg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM Pyrene U 149 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:52:00 PM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: BDP Benzene 617 226 pg/Kg-dry 50 5/14/2007 3:39:00 PM Ethylbenzene 6030 226 pg/Kg-dry 50 5114n007 3:39:00 PM Methyl tort-butyl ether U 226 pg/Kg-dry 50 5/14/2007 3:39:00 PM Toluene U 226 pg1Kg-dry 50 511412007 3:39:00 PM Xylenes,Total 9300 678 pg/Kg-dry 50 5/14/2007 3:39:00 PM I PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 17.0 0.01 wt% 1 U10/2007 10:30:00 AM I I Page 5 of 19 Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc. Date: 18-May-07 CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 Lab ID: 0705088-006 Collection Date: 5/8/2007 4:45:00 PM Client Sample ID: BF-2 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed ' SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 904 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/11/200710:22:00 PM Acenaphthylene U 497 pgll("ry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM ' Anthracene U 497 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM Benzo(a)anthrocene U 6.55 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/200710:22:00 PM Benzo(a)pyrene U 11.3 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM ' Benzo(b)lluoranthene U 8.26 41(g-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM Benzo(g,h,l)perylene U 38.4 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10.22:00 PM Benzo(k)fluoranthens U 8.28 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM Chrysene U 75.3 pglKg-dry 1 511112007 10:22:00 PM Dibenz(a.h)anthracene U 15.1 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 10:22:00 PM Fluoranthens U 497 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM Fluorene U 105 pg/K9-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 21.8 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM Naphthalene U 497 pgft-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM Phenanftene U 497 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM Pyrene U 136 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:22:00 PM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: DPM Benzene U 3.18 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:15:00 PM Ethytbenzene 115 3.18 pglKg-dry 1 6/1112007 8:16:00 PM Methyl tert-butyl ether U 3.18 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:15:00 PM Toluene U 3.18 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:15:00 PM Xylenes,Total 47.4 9.54 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 6:15:00 PM ' PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Paxant Moisture 9.96 0.01 Wt% 1 5/10/2007 10:30:00 AM r Page 6 of 19 Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc. Date: 18-May-07 CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 Lab ID: 0705088-007 Collection Date: 5/8/2007 5:00:00 PM Client Sample ID: F-5 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 988 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2DD7 10:51:00 PM I Acenaphthylene U 544 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:51:00 PM r Anthracene U 544 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 10:51:00 PM 1 Benzo(a)anthracene U 717 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:51:00 PM 8enzo(a)pyrene U 12.4 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/2007 10:51:00 PM Benzo(b)tluoranthens U 9.06 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:51:00 PM Senzo(g,h,i)perylene U 42.0 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:51:00 PM Benzo(k)nuoranthene U 9.06 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:51:00 PM Chrysens U 82.4 pg/Kg ry 1 5/111200710:51:00 PM Dibenz(a,h)anthrecene U 16.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:51:00 PM Fluorardhene U $44 jig/Kg-dry 1 6111/2007 10:51:00 PM Fluorene U 115 pog-dry 1 5/1112007 10:51:00 PM tndeno(1,2,3-od)pyrene U 23.9 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/200710:51:00 PM Naphthalene U $44 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:51:00 PM Phenanthrene U 544 ug/Kg-dry 1 511 MAU 10:51:00 PM Pyrene U 148 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:51:00 PM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW02608 (SW5035) Analyst: DPM Benzene U 2.96 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:48:00 PM Ethylbenzene U 2.98 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:48:00 PM Methyl ter(-butt'(ether U 2.96 Ngft-dry 1 5/11/20O7 8:48:00 PM Toluene U 2.96 pglKg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:48:00 PM I Xylenes,Total U 8.87 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 8:48:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 15.6 0.01 Wt% 1 5/1012007 10:30:00 AM I Page 7 of 19 I Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc. Date: 18-May-07 CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 I Lab ID: 0705088-008 Collection Date: 5/8/2007 5:05:00 PM Client Sample ID: BF-3 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 859 pg/Kg-dry 1 5111/200711:21:00 PM Acenaphthylene U 473 pglKg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Anthracene U 473 pg ft-dry 1 6/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Benzo(a)anthracene U 623 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Benzo(a)pyrene U 10.7 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Benzo(b)luorenthene U 7.88 pg/Kgitry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Benzo(g.h,i)perylene U 36.5 pg/Kgttry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 7.88 pglKg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Chrysene U 71.6 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Dibenz(a,h)anthracena U 14.3 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Fluoranthene U 473 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Fluorene U 100 pgft-dry 1 5111/2007 11:21:00 PM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 20.8 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Naphthalene U 473 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Phenenthrene U 473 pg/Kgdry 1 6/11/2007 11:21:00 PM Pyrene U 129 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:21:00 PM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: BDP Benzene 20.0 3.92 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 5:13:00 PM Ethylberuene 83.6 3.92 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 5:13:00 PM Methyl tert-butyl ether U 3.92 pg/Kg-dry 1 5114/2007 5:13:00 PM Toluene 78.9 3.92 pg/Kgdry 1 5/1412007 5:13:00 PM Xylenes,Total 260 11.7 poft-dry 1 5/14/2007 5:13:00 PM I PERCVNT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 4.81 0.01 wl% 1 5/10/2007 10:30:00 AM Page 8 of 19 I 1 ' Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc. Date: 18-May-07 ' CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 ' Lab 1D: 0705088-009 Collection Date: 5/82007 5:20:00 PM Client Sample ID: F-6 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed ' SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 926 pgtKg-&y 1 5/11/2007 11:50:00 PM ' Acenaphthylene U 509 pg/Kq-dy 1 5/11/2007 11:50:00 PM Anthracene U 509 pg(Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:50:00 PM Benzo(a)anthracens U 6.72 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:50:00 PM Benzo(a)pyrene U 11.6 pgJKg-dry 1 5/1112007 11:50:00 PM ' Benzo(b)fluorenthene U 8.49 pglKg-dry 1 5111/2007 11:50:00 PM Benzo(g,hJ)perylene U 39.4 pgft-dry 1 5111/2007 11:50:00 PM Benzo(k)ffuoranthens U 8.49 pg1Kg-pry 1 5/11/200711:50:00 PM Chrysene U T7.2 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 11:50:00 PM Dibenz(a,h)anthracene U 15.4 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:50:00 PM Fluoranthene U 509 pglKg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:50:00 PM Fluorene U 108 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:50:00 PM Indeno(12,3-cd)pyrene U 22.4 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:50:00 PM Naphthalene U 509 pgfKg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:60:00 PM Phenandvene U 509 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:50:00 PM Pyrene U 139 pg/tLq-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:50:00 PM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: DPM Benzene U 2.70 poft-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:21:00 PM Ethylbenzene U 2.70 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:21:00 PM Methyl tort-butyl ether 29.1 2.70 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:21:00 PM Toluene U 2.70 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:21:00 PM Xylenes,Total U 8.09 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:21:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisbxe 11,7 0.01 wt% 1 5/10/2007 10:30:00 AM r Page 9 of 19 i Prairie Analytical Systems,Inc, Date: 18-May-07 CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 ' Lab ID: 0705088-010 Collection Date: 5/8/2007 5:25:00 PM Client Sample ID: BF-0 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthens U 864 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/121200712:201)0 AM Acenaphthylene U 475 pg/Kg-dry 1 5112/200712:20:00 AM Anthracene U 475 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/121200712:20:00 AM Benzo(a)anthracene U 6.27 pg1Kg-dry 1 511212007 12:20:00 AM Benzo(a)pyrene U 10.8 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/121200712:20:00 AM ' Benzo(b)fluoranthene U 7.92 pg/Kg-dry 1 511212007 12:20:00 AM Benzo(g,h,l)psryiene U 36.7 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/121200712:20:00 AM Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 7.92 jig/Kg-dry 1 51121200712:20.00 AM ' Chrysene U 72.0 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:20:00 AM Dibenz(a,h)anthracene U 14.4 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/121200712:20:00 AM Fiuorenrhene U 475 pg1Kg-dry 1 511212007 12:2000 AM Fluorene U 101 pg/Kg-dry 1 51121200712:20:00 AM ' Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 20.9 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/200712:20..0 AM Naphthalene U 475 yg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:20:00 AM Phenanthrene U 475 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 12:20:00 AM ' Pyrene U 130 pg/Kg-dry 1 511212007 12:20:00 AM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SWS035) Analyst: DPM Benzene 121 3.12 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:54:00 PM I Ethylbenzene 817 198 jig/Kg-dry 50 511412007 4:10:01)PM Methyl tart-butyl ether U 3.12 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/1112007 9:54:00 PM Toluene 28A 3.12 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:54:00 PM Xylenes,Total 291 9.37 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 9:54:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 5.18 0.01 Wt% 1 5/101200710:30170 AM i Page 10 of 19 I ' Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc. Date: 18-May-07 CLIENT, United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 ' Lab ID: 0705088-011 Collection Date: 5/82007 5:40:00 PM Client Sample ID: BF-5 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SEMNOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 883 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/200712:49:00 AM ' Acensphthylene U 486 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:49;00 AM Anthracene U 486 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:49:00 AM Benzo(a)enthracene U 6.41 pgfKg-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:49:00 AM Benzo(a)pyrene U 11.0 pgfKg-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:49:00 AM ' Benzo(b)fluoranthene U 8.10 pgfKg-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:49:00 AM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U 37.5 pol<g-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:49:00 AM Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 8.10 pgfKg-dry 1 5112/2007 12:49:00 AM ' Chrysene U 73.6 pg/Ka-dry 1 5112/2007 12:49:00 AM Dibenz(a,h)anthracens U 14.7 pg(Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 12:49:00 AM Fluoranthene U 488 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:49:00 AM Flucrene U 103 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:49:00 AM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 21.4 pgfKg-dry 1 5/72/2007 12:49:00 AM Naphthalene U 486 pwyg ft 1 51121200712:49:00 AM Phenand"ne U 486 pg/Kg-ry 1 5/12/200712.49:00 AM ' Pyrene U 133 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 12:49:00 AM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: DPM Benzene 156 3.17 pgfKg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:28:00 PM Ethylbenzene 310 203 pg/Kg-dry 50 5/14/2007 4:41:00 PM Methyl tert-butyl ether U 3.17 pgfKg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:28:00 PM Toluene 22.5 3.17 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:28:00 PM Xylenes,Total 123 9,52 pgfKg-dry 1 5/11/2007 10:28:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Molsture 7.61 0.01 Wt% 1 511012007 10:30:00 AM I IPage 11 of 19 I ' Prairie Analytical S stem Inc. Date: 18-May-07 Systems, ' CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 Lab ID: 0705088-012 Collection Date: 5/9/2007 7:15:00 AM Client Sample ID: W-2 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW355013) Analyst: DPM Acenaphlhene U 991 Ng/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 2:16:00 AM ' Acenaphthytene U 545 yg1Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM Anthrecene U 545 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM Benzo(a)anthracene U 7.19 Ngkg-dry 1 5/1212007 2:16:00 AM ' Benzo(a)pyrene U 12.4 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM Benzo(b)luorenthene U 9.09 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U 42.1 ljWg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM Benzo(k)luoranthene U 9.09 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM ' chrysene U 82.6 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 2:16:00 AM Dibenz(a,h)anthracene U 16.5 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM Fluoranthene U 545 pg/Kg-dry 1 5112!2007 2:16:00 AM ' Fluorene U 116 Ng/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 24.0 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM Naphthalene U 545 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM Phenanthrene U 545 pWKg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:16:00 AM ' Pyrene U 149 Ng/Kg-dry 1 511212007 2:16:00 AM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: DPM Benzene U 3.01 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:01:00 PM ' Ethylbenzene U 3.01 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:01:00 PM Methyl tert-butyl ether U 3.01 Ng/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:01:00 PM Toluene U 3.01 Ng/Kg-dry 1 5/11/2007 11:01:00 PM Xylenes,Total U 9.04 pM-dry 1 511112007 11:01:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 15.6 0.01 wt% 1 5/10/2007 10:30:00 AM I I I I Page 12 of 19 I Prairie Analytical Systems,Inc. Date: 18-May-07 CLIENT: United Science industries Lab Order- 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 Lab ID: 0705088-013 Collection Date: 5/9/2007 7:40:00 AM Client Sample ID: W-1 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qua[ Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 952 pg/Kg-dry 1 511212007 2:46:00 AM ' Acenaphthylens U 523 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:45:00 AM Anthreoene U 523 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:46:00 AM Benzo(a)anthracene U 6.90 pg/Kg-dry 1 511212007 2:46:00 AM Benzo(a)pyrene U 11,9 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1211007 2:46:00 AM Benzo(b)fluorenthene U 8.72 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2,46:00 AM Benzo(g,h,i)perylene U 40.4 pg/Kg-try 1 511214007 2:46:00 AM Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 8.72 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:46:00 AM ' Chrysene U 79.3 pg/K"ry 1 5/12/2007 2:46:00 AM Dlbenz(a,h)anthracene U 15.9 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/17/2007 2:46:00 AM Fluoranthene U 523 pg1Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 2:46:00 AM Fluorene U 111 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:46:00 AM ' Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 23.0 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:46:00 AM Naphthalene U 523 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:46:00 AM Phenanthrene U 523 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 2:46:00 AM ' Pyrene U 143 pglKg-dry i 5/12/2007 2:46:00 AM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW82608 (SW5035) Analyst: BDP Benzene U 2.94 pglKg-dry 1 511412007 5:44:00 PM ' Elhylbenzene U 2.94 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 5:44:00 PM Methyl tent-butyl ether U 2.94 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 5.44:00 PM Toluene U 2.94 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 5:44:00 PM Xylenes,Total U 8.83 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 5:44:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 13.4 0.01 wt% 1 5/10/2007 10:30:00 AM I IPage 13 of 19 Prairie Analytical Systems,Inc. Date: 18-May-07 CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 ' Lab ID: 0705088-014 Collection Date: 5/9/2007 7:55:00 AM Client Sample ID: W-3 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW35508) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 978 pg/Kg-dry 1 ISM 2/2007 3:15:00 AM Acenaphthylene U 538 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:15:00 AM Anthwene U 538 pg/Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 3:15:00 AM Benzo(a)anthracene U 7.09 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 3:15:00 AM Benzo(a)pyrene U 12.2 pg/Kg-dry 1 511212007 3:15:00 AM Benzo(b)fluorenthene U 8.96 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:15:00 AM 9ernzo0,h,i)perytene U 41.6 QtKg-dry 1 511212007 3:15:00 AM Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 8.96 pg/Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 3:15:00 AM Chrysene U 81.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 3:15:00 AM t]ibenz(e,h)snthracene U 16.3 pg1K9-dry 1 6/1212007 3:15:00 AM Fluorenthens U 538 pg/Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 3:15:00 AM Fluorene U 114 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:15:00 AM lndeno(1,2,3cd)pyrene U 23.6 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:15:00 AM Naphthalene U 538 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:15:00 AM Phenanthrene U 538 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:15:00 AM Pyrene U 147 WK9-dry 1 5!1212007 3:15:00 AM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW826013 (SW5035) Analyst: BDP Benzene U 3.26 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 6:16:00 PM Ethylbenzene U 3.26 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 6:16:00 PM Methyi tart-butyl ether U 3.26 pgRg-dry 1 5!1412007 6:16:00 PM Toluene U 3.26 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 6:16:00 PM Xylenes,Total U 9.79 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 6:16:00 PM ' PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 14.9 0.01 wr/0 1 5170/2007 10:30:00 AM 1 M t Page 14 of 19 Prairie Analytical Systems,Inc. Date: 18-May-07 CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 I Lab ID: 0705088-015 Collection Date: 5/9/2007 8:20:00 AM Client Sample ID: W-4 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 954 pg/Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 3:44:00 AM Acenaphthylene U 525 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:44:00 AM Anthracene U 525 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:44:00 AM Benzo(a)anthracene U 6.92 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/12120073.44:00AM Benzo(a)pyrene U 11.9 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3,44:00 AM Benzo(b)luoranthene U 8.75 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:44:00 AM Benzo(g,h,l)perylens U 40.5 pglKg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:44:00 AM Benzo(k)luoranthene U 8.75 jig/Kg-dry 1 511212007 3:44:00 AM Chrysene U 79.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:44:00 AM Dibenz(a,h)anthraoene U 15.9 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:44:00 AM Fluoranthene U 525 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:44:00 AM Fluorene U 111 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:44:00 AM I Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 23.1 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:44:00 AM Naphthalene U 525 pg1Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 3:44:00 AM Phenanthrene U 626 jig/Kg-dry 1 6/12/2007 3:44:00 AM Pyrene U 143 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 3:44:00 AM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: BDP Benzene 908 216 pg/Kg-dry 50 5/15/2007 1:11:00 PM I Ethylbenzene 143 2.81 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 6:47:00 PM Methyl tert-butyl ether U 2.81 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 6:47:00 PM Toluene 65.6 2,81 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 6.47.,DO PM Xylenes,Total 38.5 8.42 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 6:47:00 PM I PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 13.2 0.01 wt% 1 5/10/2007 10:30:00 AM C I Page 15 of 19 I I Prairie S Analytical stems Inc. Date: 18-May-07 Y Y CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 I Lab 1D: 0705088-016 Collection Date; 5/9/2007 8:25:00 AM Client Sample ID: PI-1 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW35508) Analyst: bPM Acenaphthene U 954 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 4:13:00 AM Acenephthytene U 524 Ng/Kg-dry 1 6/1212007 4:13:00 AM Anthracene U 524 pg1Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 4:13:00 AM Benzo(a)anthrocene U 5.91 yglKg-dry 1 5/12/2007 4:13:00 AM Senzo(o)pyrene U 11.9 pg/KgAry 1 5/12/2007 4:13:00 AM ' Senzo(b)luoranthene U 8.74 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 4:13:00 AM Benzo(g,h,t)perylene U 40.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 4:13:00 AM Senzo(k)tuoranthens U 8.74 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 4:13:00 AM Chrysene U 79.5 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 4:13:00 AM Dibenz(a,h)anthracene U 15.9 pglKg ft 1 5/12/2007 4:13:00 AM Fluoranthene U 524 pg/Kg-dry 1 6112/2007 4:13:OD AM Fluorene U 111 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 4:13:00 AM I Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 23.0 pg/Kg-dry 1 5112/2007 4:13:00 AM Naphthalene U 524 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 4:13:00 AM Phenanthrene U 524 Vg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 4:13:00 AM I Pyrene U 143 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 4:13:00 AM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: BDP Benzene 136 3.05 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 7:19:00 PM I Ethylbenzene 3070 219 jig/Kg-dry 50 5/15/2007 1:43:00 PM Methyl tert-butyl ether U 3.05 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 7:19:00 PM Toluene 28.0 3.05 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1412007 7:19:00 PM Xylenes,Total 157 9.14 pg1Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 7:19:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 14.5 0.01 wt% 1 5/10/2007 10:30:00 AM I Page 16 of 19 F r rPrairie Analytical Systems,Inc. Date: 18-May-07 CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 r Lab ID: 0705088-017 Collection Date: 5/912007 8:50:00 AM Client Sample ID: W-5 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed SEMIVOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphlhene U 958 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 4,41:00 AM I Acenaphlhytene U 527 pgft-dry 1 5112120074:41:00AM Anthracene U 527 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 4:41:00 AM Benzo(a)anthracene U 6.95 pg/Kg-dry 1 511212007 4:41:00 AM Benzo(a)pyrene U 12.0 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12!2007 4.41:00 AM ' Benzo(b)luoranthene U 8.78 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 4.41:00 AM Benzo(g,h,I)perylene U 40.7 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 4:41:00 AM 8en7o(k)luoranthene U 8.78 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 4:41:00 AM I Chrysene U 79.8 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 4;41:90 AM Dibenz(a,h)anthracane U 16.0 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 4:41:00 AM Ftuoranthene U 527 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 441:00 AM Fluorene U 112 pglKg-dry 1 5/12/2007 4.41:00 AM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 23.2 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 4:41:00 AM Naphthalene U 527 jig/Kg-dry 1 511212007 4:41:00 AM Phenanlhrene U 527 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 4:41:00 AM Pyrene U 144 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 4:41:00 AM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: BDP Benzene 77A 2.85 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1412007 7:51:00 PM I Ethylbenzene 24.7 2.85 ugft-dry 1 5/14/2007 7:51:00 PM Methyl tert-butyl ether U 2.85 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1412007 7:51:00 PM Tduene 3.79 2.85 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1412007 7:51:00 PM Xylenes,Total U 8.55 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1412007 7:51:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS 02216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 13.1 0.01 Wt% 1 5/101200710:30:00 AM f I I I I IPage 17 of 19 I ' Prairie Analytical Systems,Inc. Date: 18-May-07 ' CLIENT: United Science Industries Lab Order: 0705088 Project: Yorkville Marathon/Project 1806015 Lab ID: 0705088-018 Collection Date: 5/9/2007 9:05:00 AM Client Sample ID: W-6 Matrix: SOLID Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed 1 SEMNOLATILES ANALYSIS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DPM Acenaphthene U 954 R/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM ' Acenaphthylene U 525 Irg1Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM Anthrooene U 525 Ng/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 5:10:00 AM Benzo(a)anthraoene U 6.92 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM Benzo(a)pyrene U 11.9 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM Benzo(b)tluoranthene U 8.75 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM Benzo(g,h,l)perylene U 40.6 pgft-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM Benzo(k)fluoranthene U 8.75 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM ' Chrysene U 79.5 pgft-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM D1benz(a,h)anthraoene U 15.8 pgft-dry 1 5/1212007 5:10:00 AM Fluorenthene U 525 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM Fluorene U 111 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene U 23.1 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM Naphthalene U 525 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/1212007 5:10:00 AM Phenenthrene U 525 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM ' Pyrene U 143 pgft-dry 1 5/12/2007 5:10:00 AM VOLATILES ANALYSIS SW6260B (SW5035) Analyst: BDP Benzene 15.5 2.80 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 8:22:00 PM Ethylbenzene U 2.80 jig/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 8:22:00 PM Methyl tort-butyl ether U 2.80 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 8:22:00 PM Toluene U 2.80 pg/K-dry 1 5/14/2007 8:22:00 PM Xylenes,Total U 8.40 pg/Kg-dry 1 5/14/2007 8:22:00 PM PERCENT MOISTURE ANALYSIS D2216 Analyst: RMN Percent Moisture 13.8 0.01 wt% 1 5/10/2007 10,30:00 AM IPage 18 of 19 I ' Prairie Analytical Systems, Inc. Qualifiers: B -Analyte detected in the associated method blank. E-Value above quantitation range. H-Analysis performed past holding time. HT- Sample received past holding time. J-Analyte detected between RL and MDL. R-RPD outside acceptance limits. S -Spike recovery outside acceptance limits. U-Analyte not detected (i.e. less than RL or MDL). I I I I i I I I I I IPage 19 of 19 I i i i i i i i APPENDIX B Soil Boring Logs I I 1 f UNITED SCIENCE INDUSTRIES,INC. DRILLING BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NO F-1 ' BORING LOCATION: See Site Map TOTAL DEPTH: 10' DRILLING COMPANY: Big Muddy Services I DRILLER: Steve TensTger DRILLING SAMPLING/METHOD: Geo robe 6600 with 1.5"x 5' sam le tube DATEMME STARTED: 5/8/2007 DATE/TIME ENDED: 5/8/2007 OW DEPTH WHILE DRILLING: 1AFrER DRILLING: NA TYPE OF BACKFILL: ' LOGGED BY: JB MONITORING EQUIP:PID Model 580B PID DEPTH SAMPLE USCS SAMPLE %SAMPLE PID SAMPLE SAMPLE REMARKS (FEET) DESCRIPTION CLASS INTERVAL RECOVERY READING TYPE NUMBER ' 0 Gravel 2 Pea gravel 0-5' 30% 5 ppm no odor/no stain 4 @ 4-5' ------- -------- ------ ------- ----- --------------- 6 2 ppm @ 6-r 8 5-10, 40% Chem Grab F-1 no odor/stain 2 ppm @ 9-10 @ 9-10' 10 Olive gray silty clay CL @ 9-10' 10'End of Boring 12 14 16 I 18 20 22 ' 24 26 28 PROJECT NAME: Yorkville Marathon LOGGED BY Josh Blair PROJECT NO.: 1806015 ITranscribed by: Derek Roberts;n i I6 ! UNITED SCIENCE INDUSTRIES, INC. ' DRILLING BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NO _F-2 ' BORING LOCATION: See Site Map TOTAL DEPTH: 10' DRILLING COMPANY: Big Muddy Services IDRILLER. Steve Tensmeyer ' DRILLING SAMPLING/METHOD: Geo robe 6600 with 1.5"x 5'sample tube DATEMME STARTED: 5/8/2007 DATE/TME ENDED: 5/8/2007 GW DEPTH WHILE DRILLING; AFTER DRILLING: NA ITYPE OF BACKFILL: LOGGED BY: JB MONITORING EQUIP:PID Model 580B PIN DEPTH SAMPLE USCS SAMPLE %SAMPLE PID SAMPLE SAMPLE REMARKS (FEET) DESCRIPTION CLASS INTERVAL RECOVERY READING TYPE NUMBER 0 Gravel 2 Pea gravel/Olive gray silty CL I clay 0-5' 40% 7 ppm slight odor/stain 4 @ 4-5' 8 5-10' 40% 1 ppm Chem Grab R2 no odor/no stain ' Brown silty clay with pebbles CL @ 8.5-9.5' @ 8.5-9.5' 10 10'End of Boring 12 I 14 16 I 18 20 22 ' 24 26 28 PROJECT NAME: Yorkville Marathon LOGGED BY Josh Blair PROJECT NO.: 1806015 Transcribed b : Derek Robertson r r I UNITED SCIENCE INDUSTRIES, INC. DRILLING BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NO F-3 BORING LOCATION: See Site Map TOTAL DEPTH: 10' DRILLING COMPANY: Bi&Muddy Services DRILLER: Stcvc Tcnsmeyer DRILLING SAMPLING/METHOD: Geo robe 6600 with 1.5"x 5'sample tube DATEITIME STARTED: 51812007 JDATEMME ENDED: 518/2007 GW DEPTH WHILE DRILLING: jAFrER DRILLING: NA ITYPE OF BACKFTLL: wLOGGED BY: JB MONITORING EQUIP:PID Model 580E PID l DEPTH SAMPLE USCS SAMPLE %SAMPLE PID SAMPLE SAMPLE REMARKS (FWn DESCRIPTION CLASS INTERVAL RECOVERY READING TYPE NUMBER 0 Gravel Pea gravel/Olive gray soil 2 0-5' 40% 5 ppm odor/slight stain 4 @0 4-5' ti 380 ppm Chem Grab - @ 7-8' @ 7-8' BF-1 8 5-10' 40% odor/stain 50 ppm Chem Grab F-3 10 Olive gray silty clay CL @ 9-10' @ 9-10' ' 10'End of Boring 12 ' 14 16 ' 18 20 22 24 I 26 28 PROJECT NAME: Yorkville Marathon LOGGED BY Josh Blair IPROJECT NO.: ITranscribed by: Derek Robertson t I 1 UNITED SCIENCE INDUSTRIES,INC. DRILLING BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NO F-4 BORING LOCATION: See Site Map ITOTAL DEPTH: 10' DRITJ..LING COMPANY: Big Muddy Services DRILLER: Steve Tensmeyer DR]LLING SAMPLING/M=, OD: Geo robe 6600 with 1,5"x 5' sample tube DATEffWE STARTED: 5/8/2007 I DATF/I'IlVIE ENDED: 5/8/2007 GW DEPTH WHILE DRILLING: AFTER DRILLING: NA ITYPE OF BACKFILL: Cuttings 1 LOGGED BY: JB MONITORING EQUIP:PID Mini Rae 2000 DEPTH SAMPLE USCS SAMPLE %SAMPLE PID SAMPLE SAMPLE REMARKS FEET DESCRIPTION CLASS INTERVAL RECOVERY READING TYPE NUMBER 0 Gravel Pea gravel/Olive gray soil 2 ' 0-5' 50% 5 ppm stight odorlstight stain 4 Q 4-5' ' 6 ----- ------ 267 ppm Chem Grab ----- -------------- @ 7-8' @ 7-8' BF-2 ' 8 5-10' 50% odor/stain Sand backfill(black) 75 ppm Chem Grab F-4 10 Olive gray silty clay with pebbles CL @ 9-10' @ 9-10' 10'End of Boring 12 I 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 PROJECT NAME: Yorkville Marathon LAGGED BY Josh Blair PROJECT NO.: 1806015 Transcribed b : Derek Robertson UNITED SCIENCE INDUSTRIES, INC. DRILLING BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NO i~-5 BORING LOCATION: See Site map ITOTALDEPTH: IV DRILLING COMPANY: Big Muddy Services DRILLER: Steve Tensmeyer DRILLING SAMPLING/METHOD: Geo robe 6600 with 1.5"x 5'satn 1e tube DATE(TIME STARTED: 5/8/x007 IDATEnMWE ENDED: 5/8/2007 GW DEPTH WHIL>t;DRILLING: JAFFER DRILLING: NA TYKE OF BACKFILL: Cuttin s LAGGED BY: 1B MONITORING EQUIP:PID Mini Rae 2000 DEP[H SAMPLE USCS SAMPLE %SAMPLE PID SAMPLE SAMPLE REMARKS DESCRIPTION CLASS INTERVAL RECOVERY READING TYPE NUMBER 0 Gravel Pea gravel with gray silty clay CL 2 0-5' 30% 26 ppm no odor/no stain 4 @ 4-5' 6 219 ppm Chem Grab @ 7-8' @ 7-8' BF-3 8 5-10' 60% odor/stain ' 46 ppm Chem Grab F-5 10 Gray silty clay with pebbles CL @ 9-10' @ 9-10' ' 10'End of Boring 12 I la 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 PROJECT NAME. Yorkville Marathon LOGGED BY Josh Blair PROJECT NO.: 1806015 ITranscribed by, Derek Robertson • n.w. .M1+.nIF P I ,rr. ' UNITED SCIENCE INDUSTRIES,INC. DRILLING BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NO F-6 BORING LOCATION: See Site Map TOTAL DEPTH: 10' DRILLING COMPANY: Big Muddy Services DRILLER: Steve Tensmeyer ' DRILLING SAMPLING/METHOD: Geo robe 6600 with 1.5"x 5'sam le tube DATE/TIME STARTED: 5/8/2007 DATFlrndF,ENDED: 5/8/2007 GW DEPTH WHILE DRILLING: 1AFrER DRILLING: NA ITYPE OF BACKFILL: Cuttin s ' LOGGED BY: JB MONITORING EQUIP:PID Mini Rae 2000 DEFM SAMPLE USCS SAMPLE %SAMPLE PH) SAMPLE SAMPLE REMARKS (FEET) DESCRIPTION CLASS INTERVAL RECOVERY READING TYPE NUMBER ' 0 Gravel Pea gravel with gray silty clay CL 2 ' 0-5' 40% 16 ppm slight odor/slight stain 4 @ 4-5' 6 - r--- ------ 253 ppm Chem Grab ----- --------------- @ 7-8' @ 7-8' BF-4 $ 5.10' 60% odorlstain 6 ppm Chem Grab F-6 10 Brown silty clay with pebbles CL @ 9-10' @ 9-10' 10'End of Boring 12 14 16 r 18 20 22 I24- 26 28 IPROJECT NAME: Yorkville Marathon LOGGED BY Josh Blair PROJECT NO.: 1806015 Transcribed by: Derek Robertson r . t ' UNITED SCIENCE INDUSTRIES,INC. DRILLING BOREHOLE LOG BOREHOLE NO BF-6 BORING LOCATION: See Site Map TOTAL DEPTH: 10' DRILLING COMPANY: Big Muddy Services DRILLER: Steve Tensmeyer ' DRILLING SAMPLING/METHOD: Geo robe 6600 with 1.5"z 5'sam le tube DATEJI W STARTED: 5/8/2007 DATFIT HAE ENDED: 5/8/2007 GW DEPTH WHILE DRILLING: AFTER DRILLING: NA ITYPE OF BACKFILL: LOGGED BY: JB MONITORING EQUIP:PID Model 580B PID DEPTH SAMPLE USCS SAMPLE %SAMPLE PID SAMPLE SAMPLE REMARKS (FEET) DESCRIPTION CLASS INTERVAL RECOVERY READING TYPE NUMBER 0 Gravel Pea gravel with olive gray silty CL 2 clay I 0-5' 40% 2 ppm slight odor/slight stain 4 ®4-5' 8 5-10' 40% 40 ppm Chem Grab BF-5 odor/stain @ 7-8' @ 7-8' 10 Brown silty clay with pebbles CL ' 10'End of Boring 12 M14 . 16 I 18 20 22 24 26 28 IPROJECT NAME: Yorkville Marathon LOGGED BY Josh Blair PROJECT NO.: 1806015 Transcribed by: Derek Robertson - s � Page 1 of 1 Joe Wywrot From: Michele Chesnek [mchesnek @chaseenv.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 2:32 PM To: Joe Wywrot Subject: Yorkville Service Attachments: Site Investigation PNAs.pdf; Corrective Action BTEX.pdf; 415 ILCS 5.pdf; MAP1.xps; MAP2.xps; ROW excavation map.PDF; Site Investigation BTEX.pdf Attached herewith: Laboratory Results Site Investigation BTEX(testing for gasoline) Site Investigation PNAs(testing for Diesel or Used Oil, no"HOT"samples) Corrective Action BTEX *Note dates on tables and attached maps for sample locations Leaking Underground Storage Tank Regulations 415 ILCS 5 *Note: refers to access to the fund after the NFR Letter has been applied for soil disposal costs. Site Maps MAP1—Excavation area and corrective action sample locations MAP2—Limited Ordinance Area if proposed (Area encompasses larger than necessary area as an extra precautionary action) ROW excavation map-extracted from USI files (this is the best I can do for a Site Investigation Map) On the issue of who is legally and fiscally responsible for the contamination,the Incident number owner is responsible for the contamination through its lifetime;even the disposed contamination at the landfill is their responsibility which is why they have to have an Illinois Generator number which tracks all contaminated loads to the landfill with a manifest ticket. Chase's first proposed option of a Highway Authority Agreement should be the most appealing to a municipal government because of the statement of responsibility of the owner/operator and the specific mention of soil contamination. With this agreement,the offsite contamination remaining(in the driveway) is addressed. The site may still receive a NFR Letter because all onsite samples are below industrial/commercial Cleanup Objectives which is what is necessary for onsite. (Offsite has to be cleaned to Residential Standards(Class I)) The Highway Authority Agreement states the same as a GW ordinance plus more protection for the City. A Limited GW Ordinance is another option as its application will eliminate the potential risks of gw contamination reaching the public through water well supplies and it raises the sample comparison to "Tier I Soil Inhalation CUOs" (note:See on the lab results tables),when this is the case,all soil samples are below Tier I Soil Inhalation Cleanup Objectives and Industrial/Commercial CUOs so the site may receive an NFR Letter. 4/20/2011 Site: Yorkville Marathon Incident No. 20060740 LPC No.: 0930255026 TABLE I Continued Stage 1 Site Investigation Soil Analytical Summary(PNA) (Reported in ppb) cue oro °o o °e °a, 6 ¢°� ,°�°{ 4 �° �o°�� .p�4¢ ti°°c' `°1QO` e° QO ti a° `a1 L1 `1 Lqd �1 y° La^ VV Or 1^ b � a°�4 � Oho O,�o pro p,�o 4�W 4e TACO Tier I Residential O O O q q C c O c O a O O Most Stringent Cleanup Objectives BH-1 A 14-15' 9/18/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-1 B 16-17' 9/18/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 B14-IC 24-25' 9/18/07 <50 1 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 1 <11 I <11 <50 I <50 K<20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-1D 29-30' 9/18/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-2A 4-5' 9/18/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-2B 6-7' 9/18/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-2C 14-15' 9/18/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-2D 17-18' 9/18/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-2E 24-25' 9/18/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 81 1 <50 BH-2F 29-30' 9/18/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 1 <11 I <11 <50 <50 <20 1 <50 1 <50 <29 <25 60 <50 BH-3A 4-5' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-3B 6-7' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-3C 13-14' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-3D 1 19-20' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-4A 4-5' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-4B 7-8' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-4C 14-15' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 1 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 1 <50 <50 <29 71 <50 <50 BH-4D 19-20' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 63 <50 BH-5A 4-5' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 —750 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-5B 9-10' 9/19/07 98 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 216 <29 1,510 529 109 BH-5C 14-15' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 30 77 <50 BH-6A 4-5' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-6B 9-10' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-6C 12-13' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 68 <50 <50 BH-6D 17-18' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 65 <50 <50 BH-7A 4-5' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 B14-7B 7-8' 9/19/07 <50 <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-7C 12-13' 9/19/07 1 <50 I <50 <50 <8.7 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25 <50 <50 BH-7D 1 17-18' 19/19/071 <50 1 <50 <50 <8.7 1 <15 <11 <11 <50 <50 <20 <50 <50 <29 <25_ <50 <50 Bold numbers are actual quantities above the reporting limit Numbers not bold indicate results less than the reporting limit. The reporting limit is shown. 4MAInNG—Erctetls the Tier 1 miWentinl t+il clean-up objcw;tive ftu migration to amundwater Bold red indicates an exceedence of the Tier Il sail cleanup objectives Site: Yorkville Marathon Incident No. 20060740 LPC No. : 0930255026 Site Address: 802 South Bridge Street TABLE 2 Corrective Action Soil Analytical Summary(BTEX) Wall and Floor Closure Samples (Repo in m) Sample ID Sample Date Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes Depth _ TACO Tier I Soil Residential CUOs 0.03 12 13 150.0 TACO Tier I Soil Inhalation CUOs for Construction Workers 2.2 42 58 5.6* TACO Tier I Soil Inhalation CUOs for 1.6 650 400 320.0 Industrial/Commerical Properties W 1 4' 3/25/09 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 W2 4' 3/25/09 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 W3 4' 3/25/09 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 W4 4' 3/25/09 0.644 0.5 2.88 0.856 W5 4' 3/25/09 0.007 0.005 0.005 0.005 W6 8' 3/25/09 0.049 0.005 0.0208 0.0081 W7 6' 3/25/09 <.025 <.5 <.5 <.5 W8 8' 3/25/09 0.371 <5 <.5 <5 W9 8' 3/25/09 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 F1 8' 3/25/09 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 F2 8' 3/25/09 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 F3 14' 3/25/09 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 F4 14' 3/25/09 0.005 0.005 0.005 0.005 NT-Not Tested Bold numbers are actual quantities above the reporting limit. Numbers not bold indicate results less than the reporting limit. The reporting limit is shown. SHADING --Exceeds the most stringent Tier I soil clean-up objective. *Construction Worker Inhalation Value (415 ILCS 5/57.19 new) Sec. 57.19. Costs incurred after the issuance of a No Further Remediation Letter. The following shall be considered corrective action activities eligible for payment from the Fund even when an owner or operator conducts these activities after the issuance of a No Further Remediation Letter. Corrective action conducted under this Section and costs incurred under this section must c2m2ly with the requirements of this Title and Board rules adopted under this Title. (1) Corrective action to achieve residential property remediation objectives if the owner or operator demonstrates that property remediated to industrial/commercial property remediation objectives pursuant to subdivision (c) (3) (A) (ii) of Section 57.7 of this Act is being developed into residential property. (2) Corrective action to address groundwater contamination if the owner or operator demonstrates that action is necessary because a groundwater ordinance used as an institutional control pursuant to subdivision (c) (3) (A) (iii') of Section 57.7 of this Act can no longer be used as an institutional control. (3) Corrective action to address groundwater contamination if the owner or operator demonstrates that action is necessary because an on-site groundwater use restriction used as an institutional control pursuant to subdivision (c) (3) (A) (iv) of Section 57.7 of this Act must be lifted in order to allow the installation of a potable water supply well due to public water supply service no lon er being available for reasons other than an act or omission of the owner or operator. (4) The disposal of soil that does nct exceed industrial/commercial property remediation objectives, but that does exceed residential property remediation objectives, if -industrial/commercial property remediation objectives were used _ ) 7 pursuant to subdivision (c) (3) (A) (ii) of Section 57.7 of this Act and the owner or operator demonstrates that (i) the contamination is the result of the release for which the owner or operator is eli ible to seek payment from the Fund and (ii) disposal of the soil is necessary as a result of construction activities conducted after the issuance of a No Further Remediation Letter on the site where the -release occurred, including, but not limited to, the following: tank, line, or canopy repair, replacement, or removal; building upgrades; sign installation; and water or sewer line replacement. (5) The disposal of water exceeding groundwater remediation objectives that is removed from an excavation on the site where the release occurred if a groundwater ordinance is used as an institutional control pursuant to subdivision (c) (3) (A) (iii) of Section 57.7 of this Act, or if an on-site groundwater use restriction is used as an institutional control pursuant to subdivision (c) (3) (A) (iv) of Section 57.7, and the owner or operator demonstrates that (i) the excavation is located within the measured or modeled extent of groundwater contamination resulting from the release for which the owner or operator is eligible to seek payment from the Fund and (ii) disposal of the groundwater is necessary as a result of construction activities conducted after the issuance of a No Further Remediation Letter on the site where the release occurred, including, but not limited to, the following; tank, line, or canopy repair, replacement, or removal; building upgrades; sign installation; and water or sewer line replacement. Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon becoming law. Effective Date: 06/08/2010 TEXT SOURCE: http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/pubIicacts/fuIItext.asp?Name=096-0908 poky _ m ROW a � I F. : p _ I ��v J a I a • m ; � n Site: Yorkville Marathon Incident No. 20060740 LPC No.: 0930255026 Site Address: 802 South Bridge Street TABLE 1 Site Investigation Soil Analytical Summary(BTEX) Re orted in m Sample ID I Sample Depth Date Benzene Toluene Eth lbenzene Total X lenes MTBE TACO Tier I Soil Class I CVOs for Residential Properties 0.03 12 13 150.0 0.32 TACO Tier I Soil Inhalation CVOs for Construction Workers 2.2 42 58 5.6 140 TACO Tier I Soil Inhalation CUOs for Industrial/Commerical Properties 1.6 650 400 320.0 8,800 Stage 1 Soil Boring Analytical Results BH-lA 14-15' 9/18/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-1B 16-17' 9/18/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-1C 24-25' 9/18/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-ID 29-30' 9/18/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-2A 4-5' 9/18/07 0.008 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-2B 6-7 9/18/07 0.004 <.005 <.005 <.005 0.007 BH-2C 1 14-15' 9/18/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-2D 17-18' 9/18/07 <.002 <,005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-2E 24-25' 9/18/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-217 29-30' 9/18/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-3A 4-5' 9/19/07 0.087 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-313 6-7 9/19/07 0.093 <.005 <.005 <.005 0.007 BH-3C 13-14' 9/19/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-3D 1 19-20' 9/19/07 <.002 <005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-4A 4-5' 9/19/07 0.566 <.005 <.005 <.005 0.008 BH-4B 7-8' 9/19/07 0.115 <.005 <.005 <.005 0.005 BH-4C 14-15' 9/19/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-4D 19-20' 9/19/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-5A 4-5' 9/19/07 0.021 0.0069 0.019 0.028 <.005 BH-5B 9-10' 9/19/07 0.1168 <.005 0.021 <.005 0.035 BH-5C 1 14-15' 9/19/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-6A 4-5' 9/19/07 0.003 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-6B 9-10' 9/19/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 0.009 BH-6C 12-13' 9/19/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 131-1-61) 17-18' 9/19/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-7A 4-5' 9/19/07 0.003 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-7B 7-8' 9/19/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 0.027 BH-7C 1 12-13' 9/19/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 BH-7D 17-18' 9/19/07 <.002 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 _ Stage 2 Soil B rings Analytica l Results_ BH-8A 4' 1/30/08 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-8B 8' 1/30/08 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-8C 13' 1/30/08 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-9A 4' 1/30/08 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-9B 8' 1/30/08 7.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-9C 13' 1/30/08 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-10A 1 4' 1/30/08 0.33 <.005 0.62 0.18 NT BH-IOB 8' 1/30/08 0.01 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT 131-1-10C 13' 1/30/08 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-11A 4' 1/30/08 0.03 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-11B 8' 1/30/08 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-11C 13' 1/30/08 <.005 <005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-12A 4' 2/21/08 1 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT BH-12B 1 8' 2/21/08 <.005 <.005 <.005 <.005 NT ST-1 7.5' 1/30/08 FOC with.58 Conversion Factor=.70% Organic Matter=1.20 NT-Not Tested Bold numbers are actual quantities above the reporting limit. Numbers not bold indicate results less than the reporting limit The reporting limit is shown. SHADING --Exceeds the Tier 1 residential soil clean-up abjeclive. ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 A o J Legal ❑ Q CA#10 111, T 11 "AM Finance ■ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Tracking Number W City Administrator ❑ °°°�^o O Consultant Cea, ❑ Ke da vs—ty ADM 2011-20 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Treasurer's Report for April 2011 Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Admin 5/19/11 Action Taken: Move forward to City Council consent agenda. Item Number: ADM 2011-20 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE TREASURER'S REPORT-for the period ended April 30,2011 Cash Basis Projected BGN Fund Revenues %of YTD Expenses %of YTD Ending Fund Balance April Revenues YTD Revenues Budget Budget April Expenses YTD Expenses Budget Budget Balance General Fund O1-General (492,939) 773,827 11,536,253 11,433,024 101% 865,239 10,801,922 11,376,981 95% 241,392 Special Revenue Funds 15-Motor Fuel Tax 405,618 35,937 689,042 356,000 194% 11,533 397,917 475,600 84% 696,743 79-Parks and Recreation 25,151 6,296 1,321,473 1,479,990 89% 114,994 1,146,968 1,461,912 78% 199,656 72-Land Cash (603,425) 42,285 161,984 413,000 39% 16,662 199,664 665,449 30% (641,105) 85-Fox Industrial TIF 423,351 - 228,360 216,727 105% 399 81,921 80,433 102% 569,790 87-Countryside TIF 2,477,758 43 9,506 12,354 77% 375 308,715 308,093 100% 2,178,549 88-Downtown TIF 136,294 75,362 88,550 85% - 1,896 1,500 126% 209,760 11-Fox Hill SSA 2,226 19,894 19,463 102% 3,871 3,458 112% 18,249 12-Sunflower SSA 6,188 - 13,871 13,112 106% 7,616 8,253 92% 12,443 Debt Service Funds 42-Debt Service 7,628 107,351 430,429 429,404 100% 429,404 429,404 100% 8,653 Capital Funds 16-Municipal Building (607,724) - 20,700 55,000 38% - - - (587,024) 22-Park and Recreation Capital 66,852 7,507 9,249 17,500 53% 24,658 173,135 14% 51,443 20-Police Capital 210,284 - 35,629 62,000 57% 50,609 104,000 49% 195,304 21-Public Works Capital 157,807 188 32,513 35,000 93% 82,344 139,000 59% 107,976 23-City-Wide Capital (18,378) 40,627 348,819 421,500 83% - 298,304 582,500 51% 32,136 Enterprise Funds 51-Water 339,360 433,676 2,623,082 2,122,354 124% 251,538 2,205,521 2,122,677 104% 756,921 52-Sewer 2,735,211 121,878 1,476,226 881,800 167% 54,714 1,818,067 2,020,433 90% 2,393,370 80-Recreation Center (127,815) 53,169 619,624 609,000 102% 44,536 678,089 675,301 100% (186,281) Library Fund 82-Library 571,002 4,781 1,333,288 1,359,924 98% 89,592 1,565,673 2,158,986 73% 338,618 Total Funds 5,714,449 1,627,563 20,985,303 20,025,702 1,449,582 20,103,159 22,787,115 6,596,593 As Treasurer of the United City of Yorkville,I hereby attest,to the best of my knowledge,that the information contained in this Treasurer's Report is accurate as of the date detailed herein. Further information is available in the Finance Department. William Powell,Treasurer Prepared by the Finance Department c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� a 0 Legal ❑ Finance El PW#1 EST. , 1836 Engineer ❑ 4O y City Administrator Tracking Number Police ❑ Ke^aao c°^ry <E `��,� Human Resources El PW 2011-33 Public Works ❑ City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Bike trail maintenance cost Meeting and Date: City Council—May 24, 2011 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N / A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/ A Council Action Requested: Discussion Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Attached is a memo which was discussed at Public Works Committee. At the meeting, the Committee asked that I calculate the maintenance costs for all six trails contemplated during the bike trail referendum. The original memo, map of the trails, and new spreadsheet of maintenance and replacement costs are attached. Co.y o Memorandum '"' To: City Council EST. �Z 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator .4 ` CC: O C u " p Date: May 13, 2011 Count�Y Seat Subject: Cost of maintaining bike trails At a previous City Council meeting, Alderman Gilson had asked for justification on the communicated cost of maintaining the bike trails contemplated under the bike trail referendum. Various pieces of communication between staff and elected officials, elected officials and the public assumed a total yearly cost of$10,000 per year for all 6 bike trails, and an estimate of the Route 47 expansion portion at about $2,500 per year. At the time, I had stated that this estimate was based off of figures located in the Integrated Transportation Plan(ITP). I was incorrect. The ITP includes construction costs for each segment and narrates the maintenance standards to be expected, but it does not break those standards into a maintenance cost. The figure we used to estimate the $10,000 per year figure was based on the current maintenance standards on our existing trails. We seal coated our trails for the first time last year, even though some of our trails have been in place for 10 years or more. Further, we have been doing spot repairs on all of our trails since they have been built, but we have been doing less maintenance than is ideal (ideal being a life span beyond 25 years and a smooth ride for users). The $10,000 per year maintenance cost is accurate if we continue to maintain our bike trails in the same manner in the past (i.e. under-maintaining them). So what is the cost of maintaining bike trails at an optimum level? The next page contains a conservative estimate of bike trail maintenance and replacement for the Route 47 bike trail, to be contemplated under the imminent expansion project. While this amount is much greater than the number discussed, it should be noted this estimate is based on an optimum level of repair and replacement, and this estimate can vary greatly. Also, the prior reported figures were for current maintenance levels, so we would expect the actual per year maintenance cost to be between $2,500 and $5,300 and the City should set aside an additional $7,000 per year for replacement of that section after 25 years. 25.00 years of trail life span 2.44 Length of Route 47trail in miles 12883.20 Length of Route 47trail in feet 4294.40 Length of Route 47trail in yards 10 Width of Route 47trail in feet 3.333333333 Width of Route 47trail in yards 14314.67 Surface area of Route 47trail, in square yards Maintenance Program Seal Coat every 3 years(8.33 times in a trail's life span) $ 0.90 Cost per square yard of seal coat, each time $106,930.56 Total cost of seal coating over life span of trail $0.90 per square yard x 14,314.67 square yards x 8.3 seal coats pertrail life span $ 4,277.22 Average yearly cost for budgeting,for seal coating Pothole repair,as needed but assuming 10%of total trail will be repaired $ 20.00 Cost per square yard of pothole repair $ 28,629.33 Total cost of pothole repair over life span of trail $20 per square yard x 14,314.67 square yards x 10% of total trail $ 1,145.17 Average yearly cost for budgeting,for pothole repair Complete replacement of the trail at the end of it's useful life span $ 12.00 Cost per square yard to replace the bike trail in it's entirety $171,776.00 Total cost of replacement of the trail $12 per square yard x 14,314.67 square yards $ 6,871.04 Average yearly cost for budgeting,fortrail replacement $ 12,293.44 Potential average cost peryearfor maintenance and replacement of Route 47trail N _t..............J L-A Z��E Trail Referendum W 7'S Project Locations --------------- August 2010 Legend J Montgomery Trails IQ Oswego Trails 1 Montgomery,,--,,' L 7-. ................. 3... LA 06 Oswego rp I .............. ............... ----------------- J Plano r ♦ S % 04' 06" 03 LOswego 46. J 01 02 ...........................•. 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 Miles ID Project Name City Share Total Project Cost Notes Trail Length(Miles) 01 Route 47-Kennedy Road to Route 71 $115,640 $578,200 IDOT 80/20 funding 2.44 02 Route 71 -Western City Limits to Route 126 $80,360 $401,800 IDOT 80/20 funding 1.59 03 Route 34-Marketplace Drive to Autumn Creek Boulevard $77,420 $387,100 IDOT 80/20 funding 1.47 04 Route 34-Autumn Creek Boulevard to Eastern City Lim its $61,740 $308,700 IDOT 80/20 funding 0.96 05 Route 47-Kennedy Road to Route 30 J$194,040 $970,200 -1 IDOT 80/20 funding 3.78 06 Kennedy Road-Route 47 to Mill Road J$162,680 J$813,400 1 ITEP Grant 80/20 funding 3.01 Referendum Totals $691,880(Total City Share)$3,459,400(Total Project Costs) 13.25 Miles of Trail Route 47 trail- Route 71 trail- Route 34 trail- Kennedy Road #1 #2 #3 Route 34 trail-#4 Route 47 trail-#5 trail-#6 Subtotals Years of trail life span 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 25.00 Length of trail in miles 2.44 1.59 1.47 0.96 3.78 3.01 13.25 Length of trail in feet 12883.20 8395.20 7761.60 5068.80 19958.40 15892.80 69,960.00 Length of trail in yards 4294.40 2798.40 2587.20 1689.60 6652.80 5297.60 23,320.00 Width of trail in feet 10 10 10 10 10 10 Width of trail in yards 3.333333333 3.333333333 3.333333333 3.333333333 3.333333333 3.333333333 Surface area of trail,in square yards 14314.67 9328.00 8624.00 5632.00 22176.00 17658.67 77,733.33 Maintenance Program Seal Coat every 3 years(8.33 times in a trail's life span) Cost per square yard of seal coat,each time $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 0.90 $ 0.90 Total cost of seal coating over life span of trail $ 106,930.56 $ 69,680.16 $ 64,421.28 $ 42,071.04 $ 165,654.72 $ 131,910.24 $0.90 per square yard x number of square yards x 8.3 seal coats per trail life span Average yearly cost for budgeting,for seal coating $ 4,277.22 $ 2,787.21 $ 2,576.85 $ 1,682.84 $ 6,626.19 $ 5,276.41 $ 23,226.72 Pothole repair,as needed but assuming 10%of total trail will be repaired Cost per square yard of pothole repair $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 $ 20.00 Total cost of pothole repair over life span of trail $ 28,629.33 $ 18,656.00 $ 17,248.00 $ 11,264.00 $ 44,352.00 $ 35,317.33 $20 per square yard x number of square yards x 10%of total trail Average yearly cost for budgeting,for pothole repair $ 1,145.17 $ 746.24 $ 689.92 $ 450.56 $ 1,774.08 $ 1,412.69 $ 6,218.67 Complete replacement of the trail at the end of it's useful life span Cost per square yard to replace the bike trail in it's entirety $ 12.00 $ 12.00 $ 12.00 $ 12.00 $ 12.00 $ 12.00 Total cost of replacement of the trail $ 171,776.00 $ 111,936.00 $ 103,488.00 $ 67,584.00 $ 266,112.00 $ 211,904.00 $12 per square yard x number of square yards Average yearly cost for budgeting,for trail replacement $ 6,871.04 $ 4,477.44 $ 4,139.52 $ 2,703.36 $ 10,644.48 $ 8,476.16 $ 37,312.00 Potential average cost per • and replacement of 44 8,010.89 41. 19,044.75 c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 i o J a s Legal ❑ Mayor #1 Finance ❑ EST. 1 � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant El K �� ty . CC 2011-46 a El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Appointments to Boards and Commissions Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Mayor Gary J. Golinski Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached list of appointees. 2011 App ointments — Ci Council — N�a y 24, 2011 COMMITTEE/ NAME TERM COMMISSION Fire & Police Commission Bob Johnson 3 yrs. May 2011-May 2014 Human Resources Comm. Anna Schwein 3 yrs. May 2011-May 2014 Human Resources Comm. Margene Westlund 3 yrs. May 2011-May 2014 Library Board Barb Johnson 3 yrs. May 2011-May 2014 Library Board Jo Ann Gryder 3 yrs. May 2011-May 2014 Library Board Sandy Lindblom 3 yrs. May 2011-May 2014 Library Board Susan Chacon 3 yrs. May 2011-May 2014 Park Board Ken Koch 5 yrs. May 2011-May 2016 Park Board Mark Dilday 5 yrs. May 2011-May 2016 Plan Commission Tom Lindblom 4 yrs. May 2011-May 2015 Police Pension Fund Board Fred DuSell 2 yrs. May 2011-May 2013 C'r* o United City of Yorkville k r" 800 Game Farm Road EMN `� `— 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 o Telephone: 630-553-4350 1c op $o Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville.il.us United City of Yorkville Commission & Committee Application To be considered for a commission or committee,please complete this application and return to the attention of the Deputy Clerk at the address listed above. Name Address Phone: Home Work Cell Email Subdivision Please indicate the Commission/Committee(s)that you would like to participate on: [ ] Adhoc Committee on Senior Issues [ ] Park Board [ ] Fire and Police Commission [ ] Plan Commission [ ] Human Resources Commission [] Yorkville Green Committee [� Library Board [ ] Zoning Board of Appeals The following questions help in selection of committee members. 1. Indicate your experience (personal and/or work) that will help you in serving the residents of the United City of Yorkville. IR ea�/S � ��- �'b�hy sys� moan-d . 2. Why do you want to serve on a Commission/Committee for the United City of Yorkville? Y1 J Se r0 /Y) c0/21M 1 vrc4 y-kt L;lvmvL1 �-d, a,,�?d -Z woaad &4 '7� CW4—e v,0'C e J?7,Ce �yacir► Thank you for your interest in being apart of'the development of the United City of Yorkville! It is the policy of the United City of Yorkville to promote nondiscri minatory practices in its hiring, and its contractual undertakings. It is the policy of the City to conform with all aspects of Federal Civil Rights legislation including the Equal Employment Opportunity Act and all State Civil Rights Legislation. 1 understand that as part of the process of being considered, it is the City's policy to perform a cursory background investigation on anyone being considered for appointment to one of the commissions or committees. Sign of A plicant Date ............................---------------------------------------------------------.._..---- - - -.._..- ................ - ---------------- .................- For office use only Date Received J l4 / Initials �F'p C/TY u a United City of Yorkville J 800 Game Farm Road EST. 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 .� Telephone: 630-553-4350 o w : W o Fax: 630-553-7575 E., Website: www.yorkville.il.us United City of Yorkville Commission & Committee Application To be considered for a commission or committee, please complete this application and return to the attention of the Deputy Clerk at the address listed above. Name Addres Phone: Home Work Cel Email Please indicate the Commission/Committee(s)that you would like to participate on: [] Adhoc Committee on Senior Issues [ ] Park Board [ ] Fire and Police Commission [ ] Plan Commission [] Human Resources Commission [] Yorkville Green Committee C} Library Board [ ] Zoning Board of Appeals The following questions help in selection of committee members. 1. Indicate your experience (personal and/or work) that will help you in serving the residents of the United City of Yorkville. fee, a(A.�kza . 2. Why do you want to serve on a Commission/Committee for the United City of Yorkville? a?_ C4�a j V8 Thank you for your interest in being apart of the development of the United City of Yorkville! It is the policy of the United City of Yorkville to promote nondiscriminatory practices in its hiring, and its contractual undertakings. It is the policy of the City to conform with all aspects of Federal Civil Rights legislation including the Equal Employment Opportunity Act and all State Civil Rights Legislation. 1 understand that as part of the process of being considered, it is the City's policy to perform a cursory background investigatl,on anyone being considered for appointment to one of the commissions or committees. Signature of Applicant Dat _.. _.._.._.._.._.._.._.. -- _.-_.._.-----------------------------------------------------_.._..-..-.._--_-._.._.._..---- - - - - - --------------- For office use only. Date Received '-y Initials , April 12,2011 Dear Deputy Clerk, I am writing because I understand there is an opening on the Yorkville Public Library Board of Directors, and I would like to be considered. My name is Susan Chacon. I have lived in Yorkville for 9 years. I am married to Cesar Chacon,who is a banker at the Chase branch here in Yorkville.We have three children: Elizabeth is in 5th grade at Yorkville Intermediate School, Daniel is in 3 d grade at Yorkville Grade School, and Rebecca is in 2nd grade, also at YGS. I have a Masters in Accounting from DeVry University, and I work seasonally part-time as an accountant at Dean Scott&Associates in nearby Montgomery. I am also the Site Coordinator for the Volunteer Income Tax Assistance site at the Kendall County Food Pantry.VITA prepares pro bono tax returns for low-income individuals and families of Kendall County.We are members of St. Patrick's Parish,where Cesar and I teach religious education to 4th graders and are involved in working with engaged couples as they prepare for marriage. I tell you all of this so you can understand that I am involved and passionate about Yorkville. I love our little (growing)town, and its people. One of the best things about Yorkville is our public library. I believe a thriving public library is one of the best assets a community can have. Our library provides education, information, literacy help, entertainment, computer use, internet, and social interaction—for children and adults alike.The members of our entire family are regular users of the library. We always have piles of books checked out, and regularly use the programming. For all three kids, it was a rite of passage when they "graduated" from 15t grade to go to the library and get their very own library card.They are so proud of their library cards. I am also a member of the Friends of the Yorkville Public Library group which supports the library by raising funds and working with the library to host programs. As a regular user of the library who is personally invested in making our library the best it can be, I believe I could play an important role on the Board of Directors. I believe my background in finance and accounting would be beneficial as a board member as well. I would cherish the opportunity to have input into the future of our library and our community in this way. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, f' Susan Chacon c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 i o J a s Legal ❑ Mayor #2 Finance ❑ EST. 1 � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant El K �� ty . CC 2011-47 a El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Library Board—Annual Report Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: None Council Action Requested: None Submitted by: Michelle Pfister Library Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Yorkville Public Library Library Board of Trustees ■ ' ANNUAL REPORT ' Beth Gambro ■ ■ 2010-2011 ' ■ Barb Johnson ■ ■ ■ ■ Carol LaChance ; ■ Sandy Lindblom ■ Zach Frisch ■ ■ Marianne Wilkinson ■ Gail Gaebler ■ ' Robert Allen ■ ' Michelle Pfister, Director ■ ' ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ' Information on the library ■ ■ Current statistics and financial budget ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ I`1■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 1p Annual Report 2010-2011 Total patron visits 165,422 Expenses Number of patron library cards 8,338 Children attending programs 5,188 Personnel services 578,966 Adults attending programs 1,442 (salaries, insurance, dental/vision) Resources owned: Books 48,616 DVD's 1,884 Professional services 6,578 Audio Recordings 3,010 (bonding) Interlibrary Loans: Yorkville Public Library bor- rowed 9,118 books from other libraries for out patrons. The Library also loaned 19,162 items Contractual services 72,718 from our collection to other libraries. (contract services, maintenance, utilities) Items checked out by patrons 165,888 The Library has five (5) newspaper subscriptions, Professional Development 8,508 125 magazine subscriptions, and 1,246 pieces of (subscriptions, training,public relations, etc) sheet music. Dial-a-Story activity(#of calls): 4,226 Operations 173,950 New items added this fiscal year: 7,997 (office supplies,postage, audio/visual, books, alarm monitoring, memorials) Library Revenues Taxes 669.561 Development Fees- Books 8,825 Retirement 59,846 Copy Fees 3,339 Subscription Cards 13,741 Rental DVD's 4,131 Capital Outlay 59,171 Rental Building 1,454 Program Fees/Exam Proctoring 91 (automation, building expansion) Fines 14,161 Sale of Books 300 Total $958,737 Memorials 1,883 Debt Service-Bond Interest 690 Revenue 589,090 Grants 17,191 Expenses 605,925 TOTAL $735,367 F/Y Development Fees-Building 8,825 Total Development Fee 332,518 c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� a 0 Legal ❑ Finance Mayor #3 El EST. , � 1836 Engineer ❑ y City Administrator Tracking Number Police ❑ Kendal County Human Resources ❑ CC 2011-48 Public Works ❑ City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: City debt obligations and options City Council/ Committee Agenda Date: City Council—May 24, 2011 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N / A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Direction on whether to pursue refinancing Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: .��0 Co.y o Memorandum " To: City Council EST. �Z 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator .4 ` CC: O C u " p Date: May 18, 2011 Count�Y Seat Subject: City debt obligations and options �At Purpose Discussing options available to the City to address debt obligations due in FY 12 and beyond, in light of non-home rule sales tax referendum approval. Background To recap our current debt obligations, Finance Director Fredrickson has attached four spreadsheets. The first is a spreadsheet of all existing debt obligations for FY 12 (current), FY 13, and FY 14. This spreadsheet is labeled as "Spreadsheet A: List of all debt service"For ease of use, I have included a column within the spreadsheet that assigns a number to each debt (1- 19). The second spreadsheet is a list of all debt services that we did not abate last year, which will be paid by property taxes in summer 2011. This spreadsheet is labeled as "Spreadsheet B: List of debt service not abated last year(aka—debts paid by property taxes)". For every payment on this spreadsheet, we must decide by February 2012 whether these payments will be made with property taxes (in Summer 2012) or whether we will be find another source of revenue (i.e. non-home rule sales taxes). The third spreadsheet is a list of all debt services that we either abated last year, or for which no abatement was required. This spreadsheet is labeled as "Spreadsheet C: list of debt service abated or where no abatement was required". The fourth spreadsheet is a list of all debt services that we planned in the FY 12 budget to be paid by property taxes through FY 12, FY 13, and FY 14. This spreadsheet is labeled as "Spreadsheet D: Non-abatements planned in FY 12 budget". When deciding whether to refinance existing bonds, to abate bond payments in future years, and other scenarios, this spreadsheet is the most useful. Non-home rule sales tax In the 2011 municipal elections, the citizens authorized the City's use of a I% non-home rule sales tax. This sales tax must still be authorized by ordinance, and will be implemented on January 1, 2012 if approved by City Council. Because we do not currently have access to sales tax figures for individual businesses, it is difficult to pinpoint exactly how much non-home rule sales tax we expect to receive. However, a study of some of other municipalities shows our range could be anywhere from 50%to 75% of our current sales tax figures. At a $2.4 million current sales tax figures, this means our non-home rule sales tax is likely to generate between $1.2 million and $1.8 million per year. For purposes of illustrating the impact of this new revenue on our existing debt obligations, I have used a $1.5 million figure in "Spreadsheet E"to show the potential immediate reduction in property taxes as a result of the non-home rule sales tax. The calculations on property tax reductions are included at the bottom of the spreadsheet. Refinancing options Our financial advisor, Kevin McCanna of Speer Financial, has studied our debts and concluded that only the Rob Roy bonds (2005D and 2008) make sense to consider refinancing. His justification is attached in a memo. The memo also contains four debt service schedules for potential refinancing bonds of different terms. As you can see from the schedule, the refinancing would significantly reduce our yearly debt burden in the near term. The flexibility provided by the non-home rule sales tax allows us to almost completely eliminate the property taxes associated with debt payments for FY 13 and beyond(-90%), which is a major upside to residents who have had trouble making the current property tax payments. This is illustrated in "Spreadsheet F,"which shows a 20-year refinancing of our Rob Roy bonds. The downside to this option is that the total debt is stretched from about $11.3 million to between $16 million and $17 million due to new interest and bond issuance costs. Recommendation The issue to refinance is a policy decision for the City Council to make. The flexibility provided by the non-home rule sales tax makes the reduction in property taxes for FY 13 and beyond a reality. The question at hand is whether we want the City property taxes to decrease between 10% and 25% for the next few years (no refinancing) or if we want property taxes to decrease between 20% and 35% for the next few years (with refinancing). Spreadsheet A: List of all debt service Debt# Debt Issue Fund Total Debt Service FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 1 Series 2002-Fox Industrial Fox Industrial TIF-85 76,783 78,563 2 Series 2005-Countryside Countryside TIF-87 306,143 304,668 302,738 3 Series 2004C-Road Improv Program Debt Service-42 103,740 99,465 - 4 Series 2005A-In Town Rd Frog Phase 1 Debt Service-42 324,179 326,379 328,179 427,919 425,844 328,179 5 Series 2007A Refunding Water-51 133,866 133,454 138,041 6 Series 2002 Cap Apprec Certs-North Water Twr Water-51 285,000 365,000 - 7 Series 2003 Debt Certificates Water-51 33,150 33,150 133,150 8 Series 2006A Refunding Debt Certs Water-51 158,506 574,806 610,606 9 Series 2005C-Improv to Water Dist Sys* Water-51 167,725 164,575 165,975 10 [EPA Loan L17-156300 Water-51 125,030 125,030 125,030 903,277 1,396,015 1,172,802 11 Series 2004B-Sanitary SW Autumn Creek Sewer-52 258,650 263,850 368,750 12 Series 2003 IRRB-Bruell St Lift Station Sewer-52 165,143 166,248 162,048 13 Series 2004A Debt Certs-SS Windett,Raintree Sewer-52 194,093 193,738 193,050 14 Series 2005D Rob Roy Sewer-52 1,385,950 1,944,450 1,978,050 15 Series 2008 Refunding Sewer-52 110,090 110,090 110,090 16 IEPA Loan L17-013000 Sewer-52 38,980 38,980 - 17 IEPA Loan L17-115300 Sewer-52 107,051 107,051 107,051 2,259,957 2,824,407 2,919,039 18 Series 2005B-Library Expansion Library-82 491,125 599,125 632,525 19 Series 2006-Library Expansion Library-82 229,675 196,363 139,238 720,800 795,488 771,763 * Sewer Fund will transfer 1/2 the debt service FY2012-$83,863 FY2013-$82,288 FY2014-$82,988 Spreadsheet B: List of debt service not abated last year(aka-debts paid by property taxes) Debt# Debt Issue Fund Total Debt Service FY 2012 4 Series 2005A- In Town Rd Prog Phase 1 Debt Service-42 324,179 5 Series 2007A Refunding Water-51 133,866 11 Series 2004B-Sanitary SW Autumn Creek Sewer-52 258,650 14 Series 2005D Rob Roy Sewer-52 1,385,950 15 Series 2008 Refunding Sewer-52 110,090 1,754,690 Total Not Abated-City 2,212,735 Library 18 Series 2005B-Library Expansion Library-82 491,125 19 Series 2006- Library Expansion Library-82 229,675 720,800 Spreadsheet C: list of debt service abated or where no abatement was requirec Debt# Debt Issue Fund Total Debt Service FY 2012 1 Series 2002-Fox Industrial Fox Industrial TIF-85 76,783 Abated-Ord 2010-65 2 Series 2005-Countryside Countryside TIF-87 306,143 Abated-Ord 2010-64 3 Series 2004C-Road Improv Program Debt Service-42 103,740 No abatement required 6 Series 2002 Cap Apprec Certs-North Water Twr Water-51 285,000 No abatement required 7 Series 2003 Debt Certificates Water-51 33,150 No abatement required 8 Series 2006A Refunding Debt Certs Water-51 158,506 No abatement required 9 Series 2005C-Improv to Water Dist Sys* Water-51 167,725 Abated-Ord 2010-66 10 IEPA Loan L17-156300 Water-51 125,030 No abatement required 769,411 12 Series 2003 IRRB-Bruell St Lift Station Sewer-52 165,143 No abatement required 13 Series 2004A Debt Certs-SS Windett,Raintree Sewer-52 194,093 No abatement required 16 IEPA Loan L17-013000 Sewer-52 38,980 No abatement required 17 IEPA Loan L17-115300 Sewer-52 107,051 No abatement required 505,267 Spreadsheet D: Non-abatements planned in FY 12 budget Debt# Debt Issue Fund Total Debt Service Notes on budgetary impact of abatement FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 4 Series 2005A-In Town Rd Prog Phase 1 Debt Service-42 324,179 326,379 328,179 324,179 326,379 328,179 Direct hit on general fund 5 Series 2007A Refunding Water-51 133,866 133,454 138,041 Further depletion of water fund reserves,and 133,866 133,454 138,041 need to borrow for Rt 47 work 11 Series 20046-Sanitary SW Autumn Creek Sewer-52 258,650 263,850 368,750 Further depletion of sewer fund reserves, 14 Series 2005D Rob Roy Sewer-52 1,385,950 1,944,450 1,978,050 creating an unsustainable cash-flow 15 Series 2008 Refunding Sewer-52 110,090 110,090 110,090 position for the City. 1,754,690 2,318,390 2,456,890 Would result in new borrowing to fund operations. 18 Series 20056-Library Expansion Library-82 491,125 599,125 632,525 Would directly impact library fund. This debt 19 Series 2006-Library Expansion Library-82 229,675 196,363 139,238 was authorized by referendum. 720,800 795,488 771,763 Spreadsheet E: Non-home rule sales tax considerations Debt# Debt Issue Fund Total Debt Service FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 4 Series 2005A-In Town Rd Prog Phase 1 Debt Service-42 324,179 326,379 328,179 324,179 326,379 328,179 5 Series 2007A Refunding Water-51 133,866 133,454 138,041 133,866 133,454 138,041 11 Series 20046-Sanitary SW Autumn Creek Sewer-52 258,650 263,850 368,750 14 Series 2005D Rob Roy Sewer-52 1,385,950 1,944,450 1,978,050 15 Series 2008 Refunding Sewer-52 110,090 110,090 110,090 1,754,690 2,318,390 2,456,890 Total property tax burden from debt 2,212,735 2,778,223 2,923,110 (except for Library) Expected non-home rule sales tax 500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 (per fiscal year) Resulting budgetary burden per fiscal year 1,712,735 1,278,223 1,423,110 if we only use non-home rule sales tax to pay bonds Scenario 1 Assumptions: Utilize all non-home rule sales taxes to pay bonds No refinancing Cash borrowing between funds to make payments FY 2012* FY 2013 FY 2014 Percentage reduction in City property taxes for debts: -23% -54% -51% Percentage reduction in total City property tax: -10% -28% -27% Percentage reduction in total tax bill: -1% -3% -3% *Property taxes already levied for FY 12. Reduction in FY 12 is for illustrative purposes only. FY 12 reduction could be used for future debt payments. United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois General Obligation Debt Review-Refunding Analysis Issue Status Issue Status Series 2002 Not Callable Series 20056 Neg.Savings(Call Date 12/30/13) Series 2003 DC Minimal Savings(.8%) Series 2005C Neg.Savings(Call Date 12/30/14) Series 2004A DC Not Callable Series 2006 Neg Savings(Call Date 12/30/16) Series 20046 Neg.Savings(Call Date 12/30/13) Series 2006A DC Neg Savings(Call Date 12/1/16) Series 2004C DC Not Callable Series 2007A Neg Savings(Call Date 12/30/16) Series 2005 Neg.Savings(Call Date 6/1/15) Series 2005A Neg Savings(Call Date 6/30/15) SPEER FINANCIAL, INC. PUBLIC FINANCE CONSULTANTS SINCE 1954 SUITE 4100•ONE NORTH LASALLE STREET•CHICAGO,ILLINOIS 60602• (312)346-3700•FAX(312)346-8833 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Refinancing of Series 2005D and 2008 in 2005 the City issued $11,300,000 Alternate Bonds for a sewer system extension. As development was delayed, some of the payments were refinanced in 2008. With the passage of the safes tax referendum, it is proposed to refinance all of the debt, to extend the payment period and make the debt payments more affordable. The Series 2005D bonds had a 10 year term and an interest rate of 4.15%. The Series 2008 bonds mature in 2016-2017 at a rate of 5.45%. A refinancing of all debt will require a new bond approximately $11,500,000. The size includes all costs related to the transaction and refunds $11,320,000 of existing debt. The sizing will vary depending transaction time and current level of interest rates and amount of property taxes applied to refunding escrow. Alternative A presents a full refinancing in August. A-1 shows a 20 year term, which averages $950,000 annually. A-2 demonstrates a 15 year term, which as annual debt service of some $1,200,000. Alternative B is similar to Alternative A, except that the repayment term is shortened by applying water and sewer funds available beginning 2023, after existing water and sewer debt is repaid. Over the next 12 years, payments reach a high of$1,193,000; some $500,000 is applied in this option. As a result, Alternative B-1 is for a period of 17 years and is $650,000 less expensive that Alternative A-1. Alternative B-2 is for a period of 14 years and is $100,000 less expensive that A-2. Alternative C is an option to refinance only part of the outstanding issues. However, because the bonds are callable in December 2011, this only made economic sense for the 2011 maturity. This option can be applied to any of the other alternatives to result in an added savings of some $10,000. Note that it is important to complete the transaction in the Fall, as this permits the taxes levied for December 2011 debt service to be used for debt service payments on the refunding bonds in June 2012, for which insufficient sales taxes will have been collected. KWMImj 5/16/2011 Alternative:A-1 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Series 2011 Refunds 2005D and 2008 ORIGINAL 20 Year Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 12/30/2011 - - - - 12/30/2012 - - 627,798.48 627,798.48 12/30/2013 505,000.00 1.200% 444,022.50 949,022.50 12/30/2014 510,000.00 1.600% 437,962.50 947,962.50 12/30/2015 520,000.00 2.000% 429 802.50 949 802.50 12/30/2016 530,000.00 2.300% 4I9,402.50 949,402.50 12/30/2017 540,000.00 2.700% 407,212.50 947,212.50 12/30/2018 555,000.00 3.000% 392,632.50 947,632.50 12/30/2019 575,000.00 3.400% 375,982.50 950,982.50 12/30/2020 590,000.00 3.650% 356 432.50 946 432.50 12/3012021 615,000.00 3.850% 334,897.50 949,897.50 12/30/2022 640,000.00 4.000% 311,220.00 951,220.00 12/30/2023 665,000.00 4100% 285,620.00 950,620.00 12/30/2024 690,000.00 4.350% 257,690.00 947,690.00 12/30/2025 720,000.00 4.500% 227,675.00 947,675.00 12/30/2026 755,000.00 4.550% 195,275.00 950,275.00 12/30/2027 790,000.00 4.650% 160,922.50 950,922.50 12/30/2028 825,000.00 4.700% 124,187.50 949,187.50 12/30/2029 865,000.00 4.800% 85,4I2.50 950,412.50 12/30/2030 905,000.00 4.850% 43 892.50 948 892.50 Total 511,795,000.00 - $5,918,040.98 $17,713,040.98 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $140,161.82 Average Life 11.883 Years Average CoEmon 4.2222918% Net Interest Cost IC 4.2896140% True Interest Cost TIC 4.2435351% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes.._ 4.1551146% All Inclusive Cost AIC v 4.3554640% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost _4.2222918% Weighted Average Maturity 11.883 Years Ser 2011 Ref 2005D 2008 2 l SMGLE PURPOSE 1 5/1612011 1 9:41 AM Public Finance Consultants Since 1954 Alternative A-2 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Series 2011 Refunds 2005D and 2008 ORIGINAL 15 Year Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+l 12/30/2011 - - - 12/30/2012 - - 612,203.28 612,203.28 12/30/20I3 760,000.00 1.550% 432,992.50 1,192,992.50 12/30/2014 770,000.00 1.950% 421,212.50 1,191,212.50 12/30/2015 790,000.00 2.350% 406 197.50 1,196,197.50 12/30/2016 805,000.00 2.650% 387,632.50 1,192,632.50 12/30/2017 825,000.00 3.050% 366,300.00 1,191,300.00 12/30/2018 855,000.00 3.400% 341,137,50 1,196,137.50 12/30/2019 880,000.00 3.750% 312,067.50 1,192,067.50 12/30/2020 915,000.00 4.000% 279,067.50 1,194 067.50 12/30/2021 950,000.00 4.200% 242,467.50 1,192,467.50 12/30/2022 990,000.00 4.500% 202,567.50 1,192,567.50 12/30/2023 1,035,000.00 4.700% 158,017.50 1,193,017.50 12/30/2024 1,085,000.00 4.850% 109,372.50 1,194,372.50 12/30/2025 1 135 000.00 5.000% 56 750.00 1,191,750.00 Total $11,795,000.00 - $4,327,985.78 $16,122,985.78 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $104,911.82 Average Life 8.895 Years Average Coupon 4.1253558% Net Interest Cost(NIC) 4.2152980% True Interest Cost(TIC) 4.1766320% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 4.0665004% All Inclusive Cost(AIC) 4.3159900% IRS Form 8038 Net interest Cost 4.1253558% Wei hted Average Maturity 8.895 Years Ser 2011 Ref 2005D 20081 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5/1612011 1 9:44 AM � r r .r- 7 Alternative B-1 United City of Yorkville,Kendall County, Illinois Series 2011 Refunds 2005D and 2008 17 Year Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 12/3W011 _ - - - 12/30/2012 - - 614,928.56 614,928.56 12/30/2013 505,000.00 1.200% 434,920.00 939,920.00 12/30/2014 510,000.00 1.600% 428,860.00 938,860.00 12/30/2015 520,000.00 2.000% 420,700.00 940,700.00 12/30/2016 530,000.00 2.300% 410,300.00 940,300.00 12/30/2017 540,000.00 2.700% 398,110.00 938,110.00 12/30/2018 555,000.00 3.000% 383,530.00 938,530.00 12/30/2019 575,000.00 3.400% 366,880.00 941,880.00 12/30/2020 590 000.00 3.650% 347,330.00 937,330.00 12/30/2021 615,000.00 3.850% 325,795.00 940,795.00 12/30/2022 640,000.00 4.000% 302,117.50 942,117.50 12/30/2023 1,200,000.00 4.200% 276,517.50 1,476,517,50 12/30/2024 1,250,000.00 4.350% 226,117.50 1,476,117.50 12/30/2025 1,300,000.00 4.500% 171,742.50 1,471,742.50 12/30/2026 1,380,000.00 4.550% 113,242.50 1,493,242.50 12/30/2027 1,085,000.00 4.650% 50,452.50 1,135,452.50 Total $11,795,000.00 - $5,271,543.56 $17,066,543.56 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars _$129,286.82 .Average Life 10.961 Years Average Coupon 4.0774022% Net Interest Cost(NIC) _ 4.1503872% True Interest Cost(TIC) 4.1200831% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes _ -_mm 4.0271722% All Inclusive Cost(AIC) 4.2376425% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 4.0774022% Weighted Average Maturity _ 10.961 Years Ser 2011 Ref 2005D 2008 1 I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5116x2011 1 9:50 AM Ell Alternative B-2 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Series 2011 Refunds 2005D and 2008 14 Year Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+1 12/30/2011 - - - - 12/30/2012 - - 608,58716 608,587.26 12/30/2013 760,000.00 1.550% 430,435.00 1,190,435.00 12/30/2014 770,000.00 1.950% 418,655.00 1,188,655.00 12/30/2015 790,000.00 2.350% 403,640.00 1,193,640.00 12/30/2016 805,000.00 2.650% 385,075.00 1,190,075.00 12/30/2017 825,000.00 3.050% 363,742.50 1,188,742.50 12/30/2018 855,000.00 3.400% 338,580.00 1,193,580.00 12/30/2019 880,000.00 3.750% 309,510.00 1,189,510.00 _1213012020 915,000.00 4.000% 276,510.00 1,191,510.00_ 12/30/2021 950,000.00 4.200% 239,910.00 1,189,910.00 12/30/2022 990,000.00 4,500% 200,010.00 1,190,010.00 12/30/2023 1,605,000.00 4.700% 155,460.00 1,760,460.00 12/30/2024 1,650,000.00 4.850% 80,025.00 1,730,025.00 Total $11,795,000.00 - $4,210,139.76 $16,005,139.76 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars _ $103,206.82 Average Life 8.750 Years Average Coupon 4.0793232% Net Interest Cost(NIC) 4.1707513% True Interest Cost(TIC) 4.1374443% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 4.0261276% All Inclusive Cost AIC 4.2782856% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost _ 4.0793232% Weighted Average Maturity 8.750 Years Ser 2011 Ref 2005D 20681 1 SINGLE PURPOSE 1 5/1612011 1 9:55 AM Speeffinancial, Public • Spreadsheet F: Non-home rule sales tax and refi considerations(20 year refinancing) Debt# Debt Issue Fund Total Debt Service FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 4 Series 2005A-In Town Rd Prog Phase 1 Debt Service-42 324,179 326,379 328,179 324,179 326,379 328,179 5 Series 2007A Refunding Water-51 133,866 133,454 138,041 133,866 133,454 138,041 11 Series 20046-Sanitary SW Autumn Creek Sewer-52 258,650 263,850 368,750 14 Series 2005D Rob Roy Sewer-52 - - - 15 Series 2008 Refunding Sewer-52 - - - 20 Series 2011 Refunding(20 year) Sewer-52 949,022 947,962 949,802 1,207,672 1,211,812 1,318,552 Total property tax burden from debt 1,665,717 1,671,645 1,784,772 (except for Library) Expected non-home rule sales tax 500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 (per fiscal year) Resulting budgetary burden per fiscal year 1,165,717 171,645 284,772 if we only use non-home rule sales tax to pay bonds Scenario 2 Assumptions: Utilize all non-home rule sales taxes Refinance Rob Roy bonds with new 20 year refi FY 2012* FY 2013 FY 2014 Percentage reduction in City property taxes for debts: -30% -90% -84% Percentage reduction in total City property tax: -22% -35% -34% Percentage reduction in total tax bill: -2% -4% -4% *Property taxes already levied for FY 12. Reduction in FY 12 is for illustrative purposes only. FY 12 reduction could be used for future debt payments. C/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number O� Legal ❑ Mayor#4 Finance ❑ EST. , �'� 1836 Engineer ❑ Agenda Item Tracking Number y City Administrator ■ Consultant El K � °°. • CC 2011-49 El LE City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Subdivision Control Ordinance Text Amendment Meeting and Date: CC /May 24, 2011 Synopsis: Request for initiation of an amendment to the Subdivision Control Ordinance regarding exemptions to requirements for plats. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: N/A Item Number: N/A Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Referral to Plan Commission for Public Hearing. Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memorandum and supporting documents. cip Memorandum EST. � 1836 -�� To: City Council �O From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator E Date: May 19, 2011 Subject: Subdivision Control Ordinance Text Amendment In our continual effort to ensure that the City's code and standards are comparable to current State statutes, staff is requesting direction from the City Council to initiate an amendment to the Subdivision Control Ordinance regarding exemptions to requirements for plats. Presently, Section 11-1-4 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance, adopted in 2004 and last revised in 2009, allows for eight (8) instances where land can be subdivided without the requirement of a plat (refer to attached). Staff proposes to amend the language of exemption "H" under the definition of"Subdivision"to read as follows: "The sale or exchange of parcels or tracts of land into no more than two parcels not involving any new streets or easements of access, provided each parcel meets the minimum lot size of the zoning district in which it is located." The removal of the restriction to only parcels or tracts of land existing on the adoption date of the Subdivision Control Ordinance, and adding the provision that the resulting subdivided lots must meet the minimum size requirement for the district in which they are located, allows for greater flexibility in staff processing future development applications; thereby streamlining the timeline between entitlement and building permit issuance. Should it be the consensus of the City Council to amend the Subdivision Control Ordinance as proposed by staff, a public hearing on the matter will be conducted by the Plan Commission at an upcoming meeting with their recommendation forwarded back to City Council for final determination. Staff and the City Attorney will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to answer any questions you may have regarding this request. Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 5 of 6 STREET, MARGINAL ACCESS: A minor street which is parallel to and adjacent to a thoroughfare, and which provides access to abutting properties and protection from through traffic. STREET, MINOR COLLECTOR: A street that collects and distributes traffic within intensively developed areas, and is used primarily for internal trips within the planning area. This street carries between one thousand (1,000) and two thousand five hundred (2,500) ADT. STREET WIDTH: The shortest distance between the backs of the curb or edge of pavement of a roadway. SUBDIVIDER: Any person or corporation or duly authorized agent who undertakes the "subdivision" or "development" of land as defined herein. Also referred to as developer. SUBDIVISION: A described tract of land which is to be, or has been, divided into two (2) or more lots or parcels. The term subdivision includes resubdivision and, where it is appropriate to the context, relates to the process of subdividing or to the land subdivided. For the purpose of this title, the requirements contained herein shall not apply, and no plat is required, in any of the following instances: A. The division or subdivision of land into parcels or tracts of five (5) acres or more in size which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; B. The division of lots or blocks of less than one acre, in any recorded subdivision, which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; C. The sale or exchange of parcels of land between owners of adjoining and contiguous land; D. The conveyance of parcels of land or interests therein for use as right of way for railroads or other public utility facilities which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; E. The conveyance of land owned by a railroad or other public utility which does not involve any new streets or easements of access; F. The conveyance of land for highway or other public purposes or grants or conveyances relating to the dedication of land for public use or instruments relating to the vacation of land impressed with a public use; G. Conveyances made to correct descriptions in prior conveyances; http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/13/2011 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 6 of 6 H. The sale or exchange of parcels or tracts of land existing on the date of adoption of this title into no more than two (2) parts, and not involving any new streets or easement of access. TURNAROUND: An area at the closed end of a street or parking lot, within which vehicles may reverse their direction. WETLANDS: As defined by the Illinois department of natural resources. (Ord. 2004-52, 9-28 -2004; amd. Ord. 2008-85, 9-23-2008) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 5/13/2011 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number Jam ` O� Legal ❑ Mayor# 5 Finance ❑ EST. , �'� 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant El K � °°. • CC 2011-36 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Police Sergeants' Union Contract Meeting and Date: City Council 5/24/11 Synopsis: Approval of collective bargaining agreement Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 5110/11 Action Taken: Tabled. Item Number: CC 2011-36 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: