The URL can be used to link to this page

Economic Development Packet 2011 11-01-11 ,��D CoT o United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road 1 EST ,,'` _--- 1836 Yorkville Illinois 60560 o Telephone: 630-553-4350 ° Fax: 630-553-7575 Ilk E AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, November 1, 2011 6:30 p.m. City Hall Conference Room Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: October 4, 2011 New Business: 1. EDC 2011-41 Building Pen-nit Report for September 2011 2. EDC 2011-42 Building Inspection Report Suminary for September 2011 3. EDC 2011-43 Comprehensive Impact Fee Revision 4. EDC 2011-44 Release of ComEd Information at Account Change 5. EDC 2011-45 EDC Meeting Schedule for 2012 Old Business: Additional Business: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, November 1, 2011 6:30 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. October 4, 2011 ❑ Approved ❑ As presented ❑ As amended --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2011-41 Building Permit Report for September 2011 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y" N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2011-42 Building Inspection Report Summary for September 2011 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2011-43 Comprehensive Impact Fee Revision ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2011-44 Release of ComEd Information at Account Change ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. EDC 2011-45 EDC Meeting Schedule for 2012 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- D CO. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0 J @ Legal ❑ Minutes m EST. , 1636 Finance El .\ Engineer El Tracking Number °< �® City Administrator ❑ 0; Public Works ❑ S a 11�/Y_" Kemlal County E �e ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the Economic Development Committee—October 4, 2011 Meeting and Date: EDC—November 1, 2011 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Committee Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Clerk's Office Name Department Agenda Item Notes: RAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, October 4, 2011, 6:30pm City Conference Room In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Marty Munns Alderman Chris Funkhouser Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Diane Teeling Other City Officials Mayor Gary Golinski City Administrator Bart Olson Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Code Official Mark Hardin Other Guests Jake Daab, Pulte Homes/Autumn Creek Ken Huhn, HR Green/Autumn Creek Chuck Byrum, Meltzer Parrill & Stelle/Autumn Creek Peter Raphael/William Blair The meeting was called to order by Chairman Marty Munns at 6:30pm. Citizen Comments: None Minutes for Correction/Approval September 6, 2011 The minutes were approved as read. New Business 1. EDC 2011-37 Building Permit Report for August 2011 Alderman Funkhouser noted the permits seemed to be trending up slightly. 2. EDC 2011-38 Building Inspection Report Summary for August 2011 Per committee request, Ms. Barksdale-Noble said she included the B&F inspection report. 3. EDC 2011-39 Amendment to the Intergovernmental Agreement Between the United City of Yorkville and the Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District Ms. Barksdale-Noble said BKFD also provided input for this agreement and the amendment will apply to the fee sheet. When the building codes were amended, it included operational permits and false alarm fees and this agreement will serve to memorialize this action. It will move forward to City Council and a Public Hearing is not needed. A draft ordinance was also included. Alderman Funkhouser asked if the$25 operational permit fee was typical. This fee will 1 cover administrative and paper costs and Ms. Barksdale-Noble said it is a one-time fee. It will apply to all new or existing businesses that fall into any one of six categories noted in a memo from her. This item moves forward to the Council consent agenda. 4. EDC 2011-40 Autumn Creek—PUD Amendment& Re-subdivision of Plzase 1 Final Plat Ms. Barksdale-Noble gave an overview of this item. In the previous year, the Autumn Creek ordinance was amended and there was language stating the City would reconsider a re-plat of townhomes to single family. Pulte has done an analysis of the market trends to determine the types of homes appropriate for the current market and as a result, have re-platted their lots. Originally there were 24 multi-family lots with 107 units and 31 single family lots are now proposed reducing the density by 30%. There was also a requirement for a fiscal impact analysis. Staff was provided with 2010 tax year information about the SSA. Pulte will be required to front fund the SSA in the amount of$1.8 million. Consequently, there is no negative impact to future homeowners. Homeowner association fees will also not have a negative impact due to there-platting. A 1% decrease is expected in each home contribution. According to Peter Raphael, in order to reduce the density, a portion of the bond has to be pre-paid and these payments will be made at the time the plats are recorded. Alderman Teeling asked how Pulte would accomplish decreased homeowner assessment with fewer people. Pulte will contribute money for this since there is not as much demand for townhomes and there will be more contributors with single-family homes. Alderman Funkhouser asked if new products would be available with the new lots. According to Mr. Daab a new ranch product may be introduced. Ms. Teeling said it is more advantageous to see some building occurring rather than nothing. She also asked if this would also take place in Bristol Bay, however, it is not known at this time. This item will also go to Plan Commission for a Public Hearing in November and then move forward to City Council. Old Business None Additional Business Mayor Golinski discussed the `Jail of the Dead" at the former jail. He has toured it and he thinks it is worthwhile project and will attract people downtown. Ms. Teeling also said proceeds help with expenses there. Some windows have been replaced, painting has been done and the building has been cleaned. Electrical work will be done and the drama club is assisting with the theatrical portion. The Fire Department has also approved the facility. Volunteers are needed according to Mayor Golinski. There was no further business and the meeting adjourned at 6:50pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by 2 Marlys Young Reviewed By: J O� Le al ❑ Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ NB #1 EST. 1836 .� Engineer ❑ 0 1 City Administrator e Tracking Number Consultant ❑ r-a.'� vC� ❑ EDC 2011-41 <CE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Building Permit Report (September 2011) Meeting and Date: EDC-November 1, 2011 Synopsis: All permits issued in the month of September, 2011 Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Mark A. Hardin Building Inspection Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE EMST 18 BUILDING PERMIT REPORT ° �� y September 2011 <ICE �� TYPES OF PERMITS Number of SFD SFA Multi- Family Commercial Industrial Misc. Construction Permit Pcnnits Single Family Single Family .-lparlowl7ts h1cludes all PermiLT I,s:suetl fiev Cost Fees Issued Lhvelliiig .Attached Condommirems Commercial Use September 2011 58 18 0 0 12 0 28 2,808,187.00 174,125.89 Calendar Year 465 40 0 0 90 0 335 12,362,226.00 426,930.92 2011 Fiscal Year 2011 336 34 0 0 65 0 237 10,916,308.00 352,232.24 September 2010 50 5 0 0 9 0 36 1,752,054.00 45,781.86 Calendar Year 499 33 6 0 86 0 374 19,680,880.00 421,385.80 2010 Fiscal Year 2010 323 17 6 0 54 0 246 7,173,740.00 266,826.80 September 2009 45 6 0 0 14 0 25 1,802,238.00 68,251.35 Calendar Year 471 42 8 0 124 0 297 24,925,273.00 671,460.12 2009 Fiscal Year 2009 313 32 8 0 63 0 210 18,633,376.00 492,014.90 September 2008 75 9 0 0 24 0 42 3,509,515.00 117,522.90 Calendar Year 714 79 6 0 236 0 393 65,524,913.00 1,475,385.65 2008 Fiscal Year 2008 434 48 4 0 119 0 263 47,220,350.00 890,434.48 Prepared by D Weinert C/Ty Reviewed By: O#%A Le g al ❑ Agenda Item Number EST. 1836 Finance ❑ NB #2 Engineer ❑ 0 �, y City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number �I O Consultant ❑ 7 ❑ EDC 2011-42 LLE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Building Inspection Report Summary(September 2011) Meeting and Date: EDC—November 1, 2011 Synopsis: All inspections performed in the month of September 2011 Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Mark A. Hardin, CBO, MCP Building Inspection Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DATE: 10/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 09:24:11 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 09/01/2011 TO 09/30/2011 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BF 10:30 035-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 20100386 1173 CODY CT 11 09/22/2011 MH AM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20100546 804 CANYON TRAIL 112 09/14/2011 Commentsl: SHED MH 10:30 006-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110004 1173 CODY CT 11 09/22/2011 Commentsl: BASEMENT BF 10:30 007-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 09/22/2011 MH 001-FTG FOOTING 20110005 109 E BEAVER ST 5 09/01/2011 MH 11:00 002-FTG FOOTING 09/06/2011 MH 11:30 023-PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 20110015 1122 W VETERANS PKWY 09/01/2011 PWK 11:30 024-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 09/02/2011 PWK 11:00 025-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 09/07/2011 PWK 14:00 026-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 09/15/2011 MH 027-ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 09/16/2011 Commentsl: UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL GENERATOR BF 003-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20110046 911 HAYDEN DR 127 09/21/2011 MH 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20110049 314 W KENDALL DR 3 09/15/2011 Commentsl: DECK MH 09:00 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20110072 3099 LEHMAN CROSSING 09/30/2011 MH 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110113 1617 COTTONWOOD TR 8 09/13/2011 PWK 014-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 20110196 4632 PLYMOUTH AVE 992 09/01/2011 Commentsl: $900 SECURITY GUARANTEE PKWY TREE & SID Comments2: E YARD TREE H2O 015-OSR WATER METER READER 09/01/2011 B`' 016-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 09/02/2011 MH 017-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/02/2011 MH AM 018-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 09/02/2011 MH 001-PH POST HOLES / PILES 20110199 107 E STAGE COACH TRAIL 09/21/2011 DATE: 10/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 09:24:11 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 09/01/2011 TO 09/30/20 1 INSPECTOR SCHED COMP. TIME TYPE OF 7.NSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE I MH 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110204 2775 CROOKER DR 61-2 09/21/2011 BF 015-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 20110223 1143 GRACE DR 66 09/21/2011 MH 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/21/2011 MH 017-FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 09/22/2011 PWK 018-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 09/22/2011 H2O 015-OSR WATER METER READER 20110225 1577 SIENNA DR 83 09/13/2011 MH 016-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/14/2011 BF 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 09/14/2011 PWK 018-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 09/14/2011 H2O 016-OSR WATER METER READER 20110226 2373 LAVENDER WAY 89 09/01/2011 BF 017-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 09/07/2011 MH 018-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/07/2011 PWK 019-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 09/07/2011 Commentsl: PROPERTY CORNERS, SEC DEPOSIT $375 MH PM 010-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110227 884 CANYON TR 106 09/01/2011 Commentsl: FINAL ADDITION BF PM 011-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 09/01/2011 MH 012-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/23/2011 PWK AM 014-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 20110250 1302 CLEARWATER DR 251 09/12/2011 i MH 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20110278 1262 TAUS CIR 120 09/12/2011 i MH 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 09/12/2011 MH 012-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 09/16/2011 I BF 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 09/16/2011 i MH AM 014-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 09/21/2011 MH 015-INS INSULATION 09/21/2011 i DATE: 10/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 09:24:11 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 09/01/2011 TO 09/30/2011 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE PWK 016-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 09/30/2011 BF AM 009-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20110322 2363 LAVENDER WAY 88 09/01/2011 BF 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 09/02/2011 Commentsl: REINSPECTION MH 011-INS INSULATION 09/02/2011 MH 006-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20110323 4606 PLYMOUTH AVE 996 09/08/2011 MH 007-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 09/08/2011 MH 008-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 09/08/2011 BF 009-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 09/08/2011 MH 010-INS INSULATION 09/12/2011 BF 10:30 005-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 20110326 534 KELLY AVE 159 09/01/2011 MH 10:30 006-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/01/2011 BF 007-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 09/07/2011 MH 001-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20110330 202 WHEATON AVE 3 09/13/2011 MH 002-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 09/13/2011 MH 003-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 09/13/2011 I BF 004-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 09/13/2011 H2O 006-OSR WATER METER READER 20110339 3343 CALEDONIA DR 18 09/01/2011 PWK 007-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 09/22/2011 Commentsl: REINSPECTION MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110353 116 CONOVER CT 10 09/06/2011 Commentsl: SHED BF 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 20110363 4606 PLYMOUTH AVE 996 09/08/2011 PWK 011-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 09/19/2011 PWK AM 010-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 20110364 2363 LAVENDER WAY 88 09/19/2011 MH 009-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20110365 2567 EMERALD LN 130 09/29/2011 Commentsl: ROUGH FRAME & MECHANICAL DATss: 10/25/201_ UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 09:24.11 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4AOOOO.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 09/01/2011 TO 09/30/2011 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE --------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BF 010-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 09/29/2011 MH 009-5-`P STOOP 20110366 4484 SARASOTA DR 1039 09/16/2011 PWK 010-EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 09/16/2011 MH 011-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 09/29/2011 BF 012 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 09/29/2011 MH 013-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 09/29/2011 MH 014-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 09/29/2011 MH 009-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20110367 4532 HARRISON ST 1120 09/21/2011 MH 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 09/21/2011 MH 011-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 09/21/2011 BF PM 012-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 09/21/2011 MH 013-INS INSULATION 09/26/2011 MH 010-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20110368 1648 SIENNA DR 55 09/21/2011 MH 011-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 09/21/2011 MH 012-RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 09/21/2011 BF 013-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 09/21/2011 MH 014-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 09/26/2011 Commentsl: REINSPECTION MH 015-INS INSULATION 09/26/2011 MH 09:00 001-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 20110378 561 W BARBERRY CIR 48 09/06/2011 MH 10:30 002-PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 09/07/2011 Commentsl: AFTER 10 AM MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110387 4542 HAL} MOON DR D 41, 09/27/2011 Commentsl: WINDOWS MH 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110400 1423 CANNONBALL TRAIL 09/08/2011 MH 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/12/2011 Commentsl: RE INSPECT DATE: 10/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 09,24:11 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT D: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 09/01/2011 TO 09/30/2011 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MH 004-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/13/2011 MH 10:00 001-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20110418 2001 S BRIDGE ST 09/28/2011 MH 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 20110426 303 STATE ST 09/07/2011 Commentsl: DECK MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110427 302 E MAIN ST 09/09/2011 Commentsl: WINDOWS BF AM 004-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 20110428 308 RYAN CT 73 09/07/2011 PWK 005-EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPE 09/07/2011 Commentsl: REINSPECTION BF 006-PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 09/13/2011 Commentsl: APPROVED AS NOTED, CAP OFF LAWN SPRINKLE Comments2: R MH 007-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/16/2011 Commentsl: CAP OFF RPZ, LAWN SPRINKLERS MH 14:00 001-PHD POST HOLE - DECK 20110434 4493 TAMPA DR 1082 09/01/2011 MH PM 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 09/07/2011 MH 003-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/13/2011 Commentsl: DECK MH 001-PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 20110435 1427 ASPEN LN 111 09/06/2011 MH 001-FTG FOOTING 20110437 2269 EMERALD LN 50 09/13/2011 MH AM 002-PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 09/16/2011 MH AM 003-BKF BACKFILL 09/19/2011 PWK 10:00 005-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 09/23/2011 BF 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 09/23/2011 MH 001-FTG FOOTING 20110438 2427 EMERALD LN 112 09/13/2011 MH 003-PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 09/14/2011 MH AM 004-BKF BACKFILL 09/19/2011 PWK 005-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 09/20/2011 DATE: 10/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 09:24:11 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 09/01/2011 TO 09/30/2011 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BF 006-PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 09/27/2011 MH AM 007-BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 09/30/2011 MH AM 008-GAR GARAGE FLOOR 09/30/2011 MH AM 009-STP STOOP 09/30/2011 MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110448 543 REDHORSE LN 136 09/13/2011 Commentsl: FENCE MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110450 401 OAKWOOD ST 09/02/2011 MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110454 2106 MEADOWVIEW LN 20 09/14/2011 MH AM 001-FTG FOOTING 20110455 1587 SIENNA DR 84 09/15/2011 MH 002-PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 09/19/2011 PWK 14:30 003-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 09/23/2011 MH 004-BKF BACKFILL 09/26/2011 MH 001-FTG FOOTING 20110456 2266 LAVENDER WAY 59 09/14/2011 MH 13:00 002-PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 09/15/2011 MH 003-BKF BACKFILL 09/16/2011 PWK PM 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 09/19/2011 MH 001-FTG FOOTING 20110457 2568 EMERALD LN 2 09/14/2011 MH PM 002-PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 09/20/2011 PWK 14:30 003-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 09/23/2011 MH 004-BKF BACKFILL 09/26/2011 MH 001-FTG FOOTING 20110458 2341 EMERALD LN 104 09/13/2011 MH 002-PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 09/14/2011 MH 003-BKF BACKFILL 09/16/2011 PWK 10 00 004-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 09/23/2011 MH PM 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110459 1867 WALSH DR 57 09/07/2011 Commentsl: ROOF DATE: 10/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 09:24:11 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 09/01/2011 TO 09/30/2011 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110460 1604 COTTONWOOD DR 28 09/07/2011 Commentsl: FINAL ROOF MH 001-FTG FOOTING 20110462 4626 PLYMOUTH AVE 993 09/30/2011 MH 13:00 001-FTG FOOTING 20110463 372 BERTRAM DR 1036 09/28/2011 MH 11:30 002-PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 09/29/2011 MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110468 1208 BADGER ST A 2 09/15/2011 Commentsl: ELECTRICAL UPGRADE MH 002-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 09/19/2011 Commentsl: RE MH 001-FTG FOOTING 20110470 2358 EMERALD LN 32 09/29/2011 MH PM 001-FTG FOOTING 20110471 2332 EMERALD LN 37 09/28/2011 MH 002-PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 09/30/2011 MH 001-FTG FOOTING 20110472 2275 EMERALD LN 51 09/29/2011 MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110475 709 MORGAN ST 09/26/2011 Commentsl: ROOF MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110477 921 HAYDEN DR 126 10/03/2011 Commentsl: FENCE PWK PM 001-ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WAT 20110480 1101 KATE DR 36 09/26/2011 MH 002-FTG FOOTING 09/30/2011 MH 11:30 001-FTG FOOTING 20110482 376 BERTRAM DR 1035 09/29/2011 MH 002-PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 09/30/2011 MH 001-REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 20110484 1591 SYCAMORE RD 09/22/2011 MH 002-RFR ROUGH FRAMING 09/22/2011 BF AM 003-PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 09/22/2011 MH 001-FIN FINAL INSPECTION 20110497 204 E SOMONAUK ST 09/30/2011 Commentsl: ROOF MH 001-FTG FOOTING 20110501 394 BERTRAM DR 1030 09/30/2011 DATE: 10/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 09:24:11 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: _T4AOOOO.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 09/01/2011 TO 09/30/2011 INSPECTOR SCHED, COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 3 ANT ANTENNA / TOWER 1 BDO COMMERCIAL BUILD-OUT 7 BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 3 COM COMMERCIAL BUILDING 5 CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 1 DCK DECK 6 DRV DRIVEWAY 2 ELE ELECTRICAL UPGRADE 3 FNC FENCE 4 FOU FOUNDATION 3 0TH OTHER 5 RCO RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 6 REM REMODEL 3 ROF ROOFING 5 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 94 SGN SIGN 1 SHD SHED 2 WIN WINDOW REPLACEMENT 2 INSPECTION SUMMARY: BKF BACKFILL 6 BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 1 EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 6 ELS ELECTRIC SERVICE 1 EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 7 ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER 8 FEL FINAL ELECTRIC 1 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 29 FTG FOOTING 16 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 2 INS INSULATION 5 OSR WATER METER READER 4 PH POST HOLES / PILES 1 PHD POST HOLE - DECK 1 PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 1 PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 11 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 12 PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 2 PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 3 PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 10 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 10 RFR ROUGH FRAMING 11 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 6 STP STOOP 2 INSPECTOR SUMMARY BF B&F TECHNICAL CODE SERVICE 25 DATE: 10/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 09:24:11 CALLS FOR INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT4A000O.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 09/01/2011 TO 09/30/2011 INSPECTOR SCHED. COMP. TIME TYPE OF INSPECTION PERMIT ADDRESS LOT DATE DATE H2O WATER DEPT 4 MH MARK HARDIN 106 PWK PUBLIC WORKS 21 STATUS SUMMARY: A BF 1 A MH 5 C BF 7 C H2O 1 C MH 22 C PWK 3 I BF 15 I MH 76 I PWK 15 T BF 2 T H2O 3 T MH 3 T PWK 3 REPORT SUMMARY: 156 *.D Co- Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number O J r 'A Legal ❑ NB #3 EST. `fi 1836 Finance ❑ Engineer ❑ Tracking Number v� City Administrator L ,W- ®�O Consultant ❑ EDC 2011-43 11L. F1 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Comprehensive Impact Fee Revision Meeting and Date: EDC-November 1, 2011 Synopsis: Continued discussion of potential impact fee reductions, particularly Land-Cash. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: N/A Item Number: N/A Type of Vote Required: Informational Council Action Requested: Direction. Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: C4y Memorandum EST. j 1836 To: Economic Development Committee From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director 0 Ia: Cl 5 ~' CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator ' K— ,y `�C7 Date: October 28, 2011 /,E �®- Subject: Comprehensive Impact Fee Revision Over the past several meetings in as many months, City staff has presented various aspects of consideration for review and potential revision to the impact fees for development within the community. The impetus of this discussion stemmed from economic hardships experienced by the building community and in an effort by the City to spur development. Previous memorandums from Staff examined the Building Permit Fees, City and Non-City Impact or Transition Fees, and Land-Cash Donations. While Building Permit Fees affect all construction within the city, Impact or Transition Fees and Land-Cash Donations potentially affect only new home development. At the direction of the EDC, staff will propose reducing the municipal building from $5,509 per unit to $1,759 per unit; and also recommend not reducing building permit fees or utility connection fees as the City's cost of service has not decreased nor do we believe will these strategies will significantly stimulate housing development. Based upon this, and the final direction of the EDC, staff has continued to evaluate the current Land-Cash Donation policy as a means to comprehensively address the impact fee reduction debate which affects all proposed and under construction residential development within the City. Land-Cash Donations As detailed previously, the City's land-cash ordinance establishes the fair-market value for any parcel of residential land as a means of determining the per acre fee for cash-in-lieu of park land donations. Currently, Yorkville's land-cash value is $101,000 per acre for a residential development. The land-cash value has not been re-evaluated since its most recent amendment in 2006—during the height of the housing boom. Yorkville's land-cash value is comparable to other local municipalities which range between $80,000/acre on the low end and upwards to nearly $140,000/acre. Although other communities, such as Plainfield and Oswego, have preliminarily discussed revising their Land- Cash Donation requirements, however no community has formally revised or reduced its acre- valuation in response to stimulate development. Options for Land-Cash Donation Revision Should the EDC want to explore revisions to the current Land-Cash Donation Ordinance, staff has considered the following options for discussion: 1. Development Based Approach — this option proposes that each development is considered on a case-by-case basis for a consideration in reduction of Land-Cash Donation whereby the developer provides their own study of the land value based upon comparable sales and other physical attributes of similarly undeveloped/developed land (location, current infrastructure, topography, size). This approach is also consistent with 1 the language of the original Land-Cash Ordinance adopted in 1977 (Ord. ) which states in Section 1, paragraph C subsection I "In the event of any such objection the developer shall submit an appraisal showing the 'fair market value" of such improved land in the area of his development or other evidence thereof and final determination of said `fair market value"per acre of such improved land shall be made by the City Council based upon such information submitted by the subdivider or developer and from other sources which may be submitted to the City Council by the School District or others. " (Refer to attached). • Pros — This option would allow require the developer to undertake the upfront cost of funding the land value study and provide specific data to consider when evaluating the requested Land-Cash Donation reduction. • Cons - This will require each development to amend their annexation and/or development agreements individually and potentially have a great disparity in land-cash valuations for various developments throughout the City. 2. Time Limited Reduction with Incremental Increase — this option would require the City to conduct the initial land appraisal study to determine the current "Fair Market Value" for and acre of land within Yorkville. If the findings result in a decrease from the present $101,000/acre, and ordinance could be passed reducing the valuation for a set period of time (e.g., 2 years) for Land-Cash Donation at which time the Fair Market Value would incrementally increase a certain percentage a year (i.e., 25% per year for 4 years) until it fully restores to the current $101,000/acre. • Pros — This would not require the City to permanently reduce its Land-Cash Donation to a level that far below other surround communities, thereby jeopardizing future funding for park developments. This option would also require only one (1) land appraisal over at least a five (5) year duration. • Cons - This option requires the front funding of an appraisal by the City which could cost upwards of tens of thousands of dollars. This option may prove difficult to administer as it would require the yearly review and calibration of the land-cash valuation with the potential for the same development to have multiple Land-Cash contribution valuations at any given time during its construction. 3. No change — this option proposes to keep the "Fair Market Value" at its present $101,000/acre amount. • Pros—This option requires no recalculation to Land-Cash Donations of current or future developments, or amendments to already approved annexation agreements. • Cons — May potentially prolong the stall in development entitled property within the City. Staff is seeking input for the committee to see if there is enough interest to pursue any of the options mentioned-above. I will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to discuss the information provided in this memo in greater detail. 2 STATE OF ILLINIOS ) ) ss COUNTY OF KENDALL ) ORDINANCE NO. 2006 -1 ORDINANCE AMENDING UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE LAND CASH ORDINANCE No. 96-3,2003-12,2004-22 and 2005-37 WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, after careful consideration by the Mayor and City Council has determined it necessary to amend Land Cash Ordinance No. 1993-3 and No. 2003-12 (Section 1.C.5--Fair Market Value)to reflect a substantial increase in the fair market value of improved residential real estate based upon a study prepared by a certified appraiser; and, WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, after careful consideration by the Mayor and City Council has determined that it is in the best interests of the community to amend Land Cash Ordinance No. 1996-3 and No. 2003-12 (Section 1.C.5--Fair Market Value), and to the extent that Ordinance No. 2004-22 and Ordinance No. 2005-37 amended Section 1.C.5--Fair Market Value, to amend that Ordinance as well. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,upon Motion duly made, seconded and approved by a majority of those so voting that: 1. Section 1.C.5,Fair Market Value of the Land Cash Ordinance 1996-3 and 2003- 12 are amended to reflect that the"Fair Market Value"for any parcel of residential real property shall be deemed to be one hundred and one thousand dollars and 00/100 per acre($101,000 acre)based upon the study by Thompson Appraisals dated August 10, 2006. 2. The Land Cash Valuation Analysis and Report prepared by Thompson Appraisals dated August 10, 2006 is incorporated by reference herein. 3. To the extent that Ordinance 2005-37 has previously amended said Section 1.C.5, this Ordinance shall supercede 2005-37 beginning with the affective date of this Ordinance until such time as Section 1.C.5 may be amended in the future. 4. Any Ordinance or parts thereof that conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. 5. The various parts, sections, clauses of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. If any part sentence, paragraph section, or clause is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction,the remainder of the Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. IN WITNESS HEREFOR,this Ordinance has been enacted this day o $ ,2006. JAMES BOCK � JOSEPH BESCO VALERIE BURD PAUL JAMES DEAN WOLFER MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS JASON LESLIE _ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois,this _ Day of �I• , A.D. 2006. s MAY Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County, Illinois this l a day of P A.D. 2006. ATTEST: CITY CLERK Prepared by: John Justin Wyeth City Attorney United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 'is o U/� V'0.` �0 `City Q of A .. V I Sam of C—ty L ��,� E 6 DEt] IN The United City of the Village of Yorkville Land-Cash Contribution Ordinance 19 -/�? /-? - 13 GPI's IS ouR PD i�y L9 Q f I0R, Lai' II L L �DLNDED 1N ' CITY of YORKVILLE County Seal of Kendall County MAYOR Leroy A. Thanepohn CLERK Olga L. Schneider TREASURER Marilyn J. Merkel ALDERMEN First Ward Frank Wolff Larry A. Beach Second Ward Dan Hanback Blaine Harker Third Ward Hershel D. Smith Roger Simmons Chief of Police Winfred Pricked Superintendent of Waterworks and Streets Elden Madden City Attorney Fred Dickson Prepared by:James Clarage &Associates AN ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY OF YORKVILLE TO PROVIDE FOR DEDICATIONS OF PARK LAND, SCHOOL SITES OR FUNDS OR ITS EQUIVALENT IN LIEU THEREOF WHEREAS, in recent years the City of Yorkville has experienced a rapid population increase due principally to the subdivision and planned unit development of vacant land within the jurisdiction of the City; and WHEREAS, a planning study has indicated that such population growth will accelerate during the next ten years resulting in the rapid disappearance of available land and the marked increase in land values; and WHEREAS, the City has found that healthful, productive community life depends in part on the availability of recreational and park space and adequate school facilities; and WHEREAS, it is hereby found and determined that the public interest, convenience, health, welfare and safety requires that a minimum of 6.5 acres of land for each 1,000 persons residing within this City be devoted to park and recreational purposes; and WHEREAS, it is hereby found and determined that the public interest, convenience, health, welfare and safety require the establishment of school sites within the City in accordance with the following criteria which is consistent with the minimum site recommendations of the Office of the State Superintendent of the Illinois Office of Education and the School Districts operating within the jurisdiction of the City: 600-capacity elementary schools on eleven (11) acres of land. (Illinois Office of Education Standards-minimum of five (5) acres plus an additional acre for each 100 pupils of predicted enrollment). 750-capacity junior high schools on twenty-eight (28) acres of land. (Illinois Office of Education Standards -minimum of twenty (20) acres plus an additional acre for each 100 pupils of predicted enrollment or an appropriate number of acres per 100 pupils of predicted enrollment). 1,500-capacity high school schools on forty-five (45) acres of land. (Illinois Office of Education Standards -minimum of thirty (30) acres plus an additional acre for each 100 pupils of predicted enrollment); and WHEREAS, demographic studies of the residential portions of a proposed subdivision or planned unit development can be readily and scientifically conducted to determine the number of elementary and secondary school-age children and adults to be generated therefrom, and provide a method whereby the required dedications of land directly attributable to the activity of the sub-divider-developer and the proposed subdivision or planned development may be calculated; and WHEREAS, it has been found and determined that the location of park and recreation and school sites to serve the immediate and future needs of residents and children of each new subdivision, mobile home park, or planned unit development is just as essential to proper land development as are streets, water, sewers and sidewalks, and to that end the City of Yorkville has determined that the dedication of land for park and recreation and school sites or cash contributions in lieu of actual land dedication (where the latter is deemed impractical) or a combination of both, shall be required of each subdivider, or developer of a planned unit development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, as follows: SECTION 1 Dedication of Park Lands and School Sites or For Payments of Fees in Lieu Thereof As a condition of approval of a final plat of subdivision, or of a final plat of a planned unit development, each subdivider or developer will be required to dedicate land for park and recreational purposes and land for school sites, to serve the immediate and future needs of the residents of the development, or cash contribution in lieu of actual land dedication or a combination of both at the option of the City, in accordance with the following criteria and formula: A. Criteria for Requiring Park and Recreation Land Dedication. 1. Requirement and Population Ratio. The ultimate density of a proposed development shall bear directly upon the amount of land required for dedication. The total requirement shall be 6.5 acres of land per 1,000 of ultimate population in accordance with the following classifications: Types of Minimum Acres Per Recreation Area Size Range 1 9 000 People (a) Play Lot Minimum 8,000 Sq. Ft. Not Applicable (b) School-Park (Neighborhood Playground) Minimum Park of 5 Acres 1.25 (c) Neighborhood Park Minimum 3'/z Acres 1.0 (d District-Wide Park Minimum 4 Acres or Play Field up to 30 Acres 1.25 (e) Community Wide Minimum 12 Acres Recreation Park up to 30 Acres 3.0 Total 6.5 Acres of Land per 1,000 People 2. Credit for Private Open Spaces and Recreation Areas. When subdividers or developers provide their own open space for recreation areas and facilities, it has the effect of reducing the demand for local public recreational services. Depending on the size of the development a portion of the park and recreation area in subdivisions or planned unit developments may, at the option of the City Council, be provided in the form of ``semi-private"* open space in lieu of dedicated "public" open space. The extent of same shall be determined by the City Council based upon the needs of the projected residents, and in conformance to the total park and recreation land for the general area. * A semi-private open space would be described as a "mini-park area" within a development and used primarily by the residents of that development. -2- In general, a substitution of semi-private open space for dedicated parks will imply a substantially higher degree of improvement and the installation of recreational facilities, including equipment by the developer as part of his obligation. Detailed plans of such areas, including specifications of facilities to be installed must be approved by the City, and before any credit is given for private recreation areas, the subdivider or developer must guarantee that those semi-private recreation areas will be permanently maintained for such use by the execution of the appropriate legal documents. Private "swimming clubs" are included in this provision. A copy of "Suggested Criteria for Swimming Pool Development" as adopted by the Yorkville City Council shall be used for the guidance of the developer. When an adjustment for private recreation areas is warranted, it will be necessary to compute the total park land dedication that would have been required from the subdivision or planned unit development and then subtract the credit to be given. B. Criteria for Requiring School Site Dedication. 1. Requirement and Population Ratio. The ultimate number of students to be generated by a subdivision or planned unit development shall bear directly upon the amount of land required to be dedicated for school sites. The land dedication requirement shall be determined by obtaining the ratio of: (a) estimated children to be served in each such school classification over the (b) maximum recommended number of students to be served in each such school classification as stated herein, and then applying such ratio to the (c) said minimum recommended number of acres for a school site of each such school classification as stated herein. The product thereof shall be the acres of land deemed needed to have sufficient land for school sites to serve the estimated increased children in each such school classification. 2. School Classifications and Size of School Site. School classifications and size of school sites within the City shall be determined in accordance with the following criteria: Minimum Number of Maximum Number of Acres of Land for Each School Classification Students for Each Such School Site of Such by Grades School Classification Classification Elementary Schools Grades- Kindergarten through 6th 600 Students 11 Acres Junior High Schools Grades 7th through 8th 750 Students 28 Acres High Schools Grades 9th through 12th 1,500 Students 45 Acres 3. Location. The Comprehensive School Plan and/or the appropriate standards adopted by the affected School District shall be used as a guideline in locating sites. A large map of the school district, identifying the general vicinity planned for future school sites will be located in the school district's office. -3- C. Criteria for Requiring a Contribution in Lieu of Park and School Sites. Where the development is small and the resulting site is too small to be practical or when the available land is inappropriate for park and recreational purpose or a school site, the City shall require the subdivider or developer to pay a cash contribution in lieu of the land dedication required. The word small in this section is defined as a total number of proposed dwelling units that will produce less than the maximum number of students for one school of each school classification as set forth in Section 2. School Classifications and Size of School Site. The cash contributions in lieu of park and recreation land dedication shall be held in trust by the City, or other public body designated by the City, solely for the acquisition of park and recreation land as hereinbefore classified, which will be available to serve the immediate or future needs of the residents of that subdivision or development or for the improvement of other existing local park and recreation land which already serves such needs. The cash contributions in lieu of school sites shall be held ir_ trust by the City, or other public body designated by the City, solely for use in the acquisition of land for a school site to serve the immediate or future needs of children from that subdivision or development or for the improvement or expansion to any existing school site which already serves such needs, but not for the construction of any school buildings or additions thereto. If any portion of a cash contribution in lieu of park and recreation land dedication, or cash contribution in lieu of school site is not expended for the purposes set forth herein within ten years from the date of receipt, it shall be refunded to the developer who made such contribution. 1. Fair Market Value. The cash contributions in lieu of land shall be based on the "fair market value" of the acres of land in the area improved that otherwise would have been dedicated as park and recreation and school sites. It has been determined that the present "fair market value" of such improved land in and surrounding the City is$15,000.00 per acre and such figure shall be used in making any calculation herein unless the subdivider or developer files a written objection thereto. In the event of any such objection the developer shall submit an appraisal showing the "fair market value" of such improved land in the area of his development or other evidence thereof and final determination of said "fair market value" per acre of such improved land shall be made by the City Council based upon such information submitted by the subdivider or developer and from other sources which may be submitted to the City Council by the School District or others. 2. Criteria for Requiring Dedication and a Fee. There will be situations in subdivisions or planned unit developments when a combination of land dedication and a contribution in lieu of land are both necessary. These occasions will arise when: (a) Only a portion of the land to be developed is proposed as the location for a park or school site. That portion of the land within the subdivision falling within the park or school location shall be dedicated as a site as aforesaid, and a cash contribution in lieu thereof shall be required for any additional land that would have been required to be dedicated; (b) A major part of the local park or recreation site or school site has already been acquired and only a small portion of land is needed from the development to complete the site. The remaining portions shall be required -4- by dedication, and a cash contribution in lieu thereof shall be required. D. Density Formula. The attached table, marked as Table No. 1, the same being an Estimated Ultimate Population Per Dwelling Unit, is generally indicative of current and short range projected trends in family size for new construction and shall be used in calculating the amount of required dedication of acres of land or the cash contributions in lieu thereof unless a written objection is filed thereto by the subdivider or developer. In the event a subdivider or developer files a written objection to the Table of Estimated Ultimate Population Per Dwelling Unit, attached hereto, he shall submit his own demographic study showing the estimated additional population to be generated from the subdivision or planned unit development and in that event final determination of the density formula to be used in such calculations shall be made by the City Council, based upon such demographic information submitted by the subdivider or developer and from other sources which may be submitted to the City Council by the School District or others. It is recognized that population density, age distribution and local conditions change over the years, and the specific formula for the dedication of land, or the payment of fees in lieu thereof, as stated herein is subject to periodic review and amendment if necessary. E. Reservation of Additional Land. Where the School District's comprehensive plan or the standards of the City call for a larger amount of park and recreational land or school sites in a particular subdivision or planned unit development than the developer is required to dedicate, the land needed beyond the developer's contribution shall be reserved for subsequent purchase by the City or other public body designated by the City, provided that such acquisition is made within one year from the date of approval of the final plat. F. Combining with Adjoining Developments. Where the subdivision or planned unit development is less than 40 acres, public open space or a school site which is to be dedicated should, where possible, be combined with dedications from adjoining developments in order to produce usable recreation areas or school sites without hard_ ship on a particular developer. G. Topography and Grading. The slope, topography and geology of the dedicated site as well as its surrounding must be suitable for its intended purposes. Grading on sites dedicated for park and recreational uses shall not differ greatly from surrounding land. H. Improved Sites. All sites shall be dedicated in a condition ready for full service of electrical, water, sewer and streets (including enclosed drainage and curb and gutter) as applicable to the location of the site, or acceptable provision made therefor. The sidewalks and trees normally included within the definition of "improved" sites may be deleted due to the delay time between dedication of any such school site and construction of school facilities thereon. I. Time of Conveyance or Payment. The subdivider or developer shall convey to the respective school districts the land required under this agreement within thirty days after any subdivision plat or final plat of a planned unit development is recorded in the County Clerk's office, or a conditional use permit is granted by the City Council. All improvements shall be completed within such time as required by the City. A subdivider, developer or builder shall make each cash contribution required under this ordinance directly at the Administrative Offices of the School District wherein the development, subdivision or building is located. Said School District shall issue a receipt as evidence of said payment. The City will not issue the Certificate of Occupancy to the subdivider, developer, or builder without said receipt of payment. SECTION 2 The dedications of land or cash contributions in lieu thereof required by this Ordinance shall also be required as a condition to the annexation of any land to the City and provisions therefor shall be incorporated in any pre-annexation agreement governing such land. SECTION 3 This Ordinance shall be applicable only to building lots, as defined by the present Building Code and Zoning Ordinance, created by a division of an existing tract or parcel of land or by platting subsequent to the effective date of this Ordinance. SECTION 4 If any provisions of this Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such partial invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance, which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application thereof, and to this extent the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be coverable. SECTION 5 That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage as provided by law and shall be published in pamphlet form by authority of the City Council of the City of Yorkville. PASSED this 1st day of December, 1977. Olga L. Schneider City Clerk SIGNED and APPROVED this 1st day of December, 1977. LeRoy E. Thanepohn Mayor -s- PARK &RECREATION FACILITIES SUMMARY&CONCLUSIONS 1. Within the BACKGROUND REVIEW Sheet, the following Standards were concluded for Park & Recreation Areas: Local &Urban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 Acres / 1,000 Persons Regional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .20 Acres / 1,000 Persons TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 Acres / 1,000 Persons 2. For the purposes of this study, the regional requirements will be omitted because they are currently being met or will be met by the County and State. 3. The remaining area requirements are therefore — Local &Urban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 Acres / 1,000 Persons 4. Taking into account the Yorkville area, with its many existing open space facilities, the above Standards could be reduced if the quality of new recreational sites would remain high. The recommendation for minimum acceptable recreation space should be: Yorkville Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6.5 Acres/ 1,000 Persons 5. This amount of 6.5 acres per 1,000 persons is recommended for the public welfare and developments within the community. It is also noted that this Standard of 6.5 acres has also been determined by other communities after careful study and that the City of Yorkville is not requesting or adopting Standards which are contrary to Municipal Recreation Standards. BACKGROUND REVIEW STANDARDS FOR GROSS RECREATION ACREAGE A. THE GENERALLY ACCEPTED STANDARD For Recreation Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Acre per 100 Persons 10 Acres per 1,000 Persons B. THE NATIONAL RECREATION ASSOCIATION Recommends Higher Standards For Smaller Communities: 1,000 to 2,500 . . . . . . . . . .1 Acre per 50 Persons 20 Acres per 1,000 Persons Under 1,000 . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Acre per 40 Persons 25 Acres per 1,000 Persons C. In Addition, NATURAL PRESERVES* should comprise extra space at . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Acre per 50 Persons 20 Acres per 1,000 Persons -7- D. THE TOTAL RECREATION SPACE Standards are...Local &Urban Areas . . . . . . . .10 Acres per 1,000 Persons Regional Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Acres per 1,000 Persons TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30 Acres per 1,000 Persons E. FIFTY PERCENT (50%) of all Urban Recreation Acreage should be devoted to Active Recreation Use. SOURCES: Administration of Parks and Recreation `Krause National Recreation Association Recreation Areas: Their Design and Equipment - Butler Standards for Municipal Recreation Areas - Recreation/Butler Introduction to Community Recreation - Butler Guide for Planning Recreation Parks in California Mandatory Dedication of Land or Fees - In Lieu of Land for Parks and Schools - M.E. Brooks Analyzing the Impact of Development - Urban Land Institute * NATURAL PRESERVES include forest preserves, green belts, regional parks and open space. PARK&RECREATION FACILITIES CALCULATION SUMMARY — FIRST YEAR COSTS METHOD YEAR 1995 DESIGN POPULATION FORECAST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20,000 PRESENT POPULATION OF STUDY AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,600 ESTIMATED INCREASE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = 11,400 People TOTAL COST INCREASES (1995 DESIGN) Land Purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$1,111,500.00 Building Facilities & Site Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1,319,700.00 First Year Operating Salaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .96,000.00 COST INCREASE TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = $2,527,200.00 COST PER PERSON $2,527,200 — 11,400 People . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . = $221.70/Person COST PER SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE 3.7 People/Unit X $221.70/Person . . . . . . . . = $820.20 Per S.F. House COST PER APARTMENT UNIT 2.1 People/Unit X $221.70/Person . . . . . . . . . . . . = $465.60 Per .Apt. Unit RECOMMENDED CASH OR LAND CONTRIBUTION SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE CONSTRUCTION 45% +/- of $820.20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ $369.00/Unit MULTI-FAMILY UNIT CONTRIBUTION 45% +/- of $465.60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ $209.00/Unit -9- Copied from "ADMINISTRATION OF PARKS AND RECREATION" Textbook written by Krause RECREATION FACILJ=S Fac htv F•:nctiana! Conljinat:-- Planning Area Name Standard Name Staniar-: Neighborhood Playlot 1,500 ,000 (local) square feet Neighborhood 1 acre per 800 Playground- 23; acres per playground population park 1.000 popu- iNeighborhood 1 acre per 1,000 lation park population Community Playfield 1 acre per 800 Playfield- 2K acres per (local) population park 1,000 popu- Community ` lation park - I OUTDoon RECREATION FAeurrms—SPACE REQc*Y_Nm-fTs Large park Over 100 acres Large recrea- 5 acres per Lion park 1,000 popu- Dimensions Standard per lation Facility Area Recommended Population. r' Region Reservation Over 1,000 20 acres per Arboretum 1 for each 10,000 acres 1.000 popu- Archery range 300' 50' X -50'. 1 for each 1,500 Forest pre- Reservation lation o Baseball diamond 90' diamond 300' X 300' - 1 foi each 6.000 selves _ — Bicycle trail — 1 for each 2,500 Parkways Parkways Bridle trail — — 1 for each 2,500 Greenbelts — Greenbelts — Bowling green 14' X 110' 120' X 120' 1 for each 1,5Q0 Boating facility — — 1 for each 2,500 Band shell — — 1 for each 10,000 Botanical garden — 1 for each 10,000 Basketball court 50' X94' 60' X 1�' — CoN�-VrrY"Cer+Tm-Brrrrn�YC SPACE ReQcm��.�rrs Boccie area •18' X 62' 30' X 80' — Croquet area 30' X 60' 30' X 6(r — Adjoining Junior or Separate Structure Casting pool _ — 1 for each 2,500 Senior High School in Playfield-Park Camp 1 for each 10,000 Facility (square feet) (square feet) Football field 160' X 360' 180' X 420' — Arts-and-crafts rooms . 4.000 Handball court 20' X 34 30' X 45, 1 for each 1,500 Science study rooms 4,000 Horsehoe area. 40' spacing 12' X 5(r — Social halls 4,000 4,000 Roque court 30' X 60' 30' X 60' 1 for each 1.500 Multipurpose rooms * 3,000 Recreation pier — — 1 for each 2,500 Kitchen 300 . 300 Ice-skating area — — Shuffleboard court 6' X J7' 10' X 64' 1 for each 1,500 Adn'n"`tration offices Teen-alters'lounge 2, Golf Coif course (9 holes) 50 acres — 1 hole for each 3.000 Hallways; storage, display, and sanitary Colt course (18 holes) 100 acres — — facilities 5,000 10,000 Soccer field 310' X :�3V 2-10' X 360' 1 for each 1500 11 600 '10,000 Softball diamond 60' diamond 250' X 250' 1 for each 3,000 Subtotal 27' X 8' singles 5Y 120' 1 for each '2.000 Patio and Sreplace 2.OW 2.000 Tennis court 36' X T,8' doubles SO' x 120' 1 for aclt '..500 -approaches and design 5.000 10,;100 Shooting ra.-Ige — Total 19,600 f 39• F Volleyball court 30' X 60' =Ay X 50' — PARK 6 RECREATION FACILITIES SIZE - AREA CALCULATION TABLE RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BUILDING $15,000/ACRE COST OF BUILDING TOTAL COST STUDY AREA DESIGN SITE SIZE FACILITY IMPROVED ADDITIONAL FACILITIES SITE AND 1ST YEAR TOTAL LOCATION POPULATION (ACRES) SIZE SITE COST FACILITIES COST FACILITIES STAFF SIZE STAFF COST COST 11 1-South Side City 2,500 16.25 SEE BELOW $ 243,750 $ 20,000 SEE BELOW $ 263,750 3 - 5 $ 24,000 11 2-N.E. Side City 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 11 3-N.W. Side City 1,500 9.75 146,250 20,000 166,250 2 - 4 16,000 # 4-Country Side 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 11 5-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 11 6-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000- # 7-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 11 8-Unincorporated ' 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 11 9-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 #10-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 #11-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 1112-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,5'00 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 #13-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 #14-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 1115-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 1116-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 1117-Unincorporated 500 3.25 48,750 10,000 58,750 1 - 2 8,000 1118-Unincorporated 1,000 6.50 97,500 10,000 107,500 1 - 3 8,000 1119-Unincorporated 500 3.25 48,750 10,000 48,740 1 - 1 8,000 #20-Boy Scout Camp -- -- -- -- -- TOTALS 20,000 130.0 ACRE 30,000 S.F. $1,950,000 $210,000 $1,200,000 $3,360,000 22 - 58 $176,000 53,536,000 Amounts for Increase 11,400 74.1 ACRE 30,000 S.F. 51,111,500 5119,700 $1,200,000 $2,431.200 12 - 30 $ 96,000 52,527,200 in Population Only Population Increase Increase Size TABLE ESTIMATED ULTIMATE POPULATION PER DWELLING UNIT [Grade Grouping K-6,7-8,9-12[ Type of Unit Pre-School Elementary Junior High Total High School Grades K-6 Grades 7-8 Grades K-8 Grades 9-12 Adults Total 0-4 Years 5-11 Years 12-13 Years 5-13 Years 14-17 Years [18&up] Per Unit Detached Single Family: 3 Bedroom .306 .67 .17 .84 .30 2.00 3.446 4 Bedroom .332 .76 .26 1.02 .42 2.26 4.032 5 Bedroom .355 1.09 .45 1.54 .57 2.37 4.835 Attached Single Family (Townhouse, Row House, Quadriplex, etc.): i 1 Bedroom 1.52 1.520 2 Bedroom .477 .156 .014 .17 .04 1.96 2.647 3 Bedroom .503 .513 .087 .60 .16 2.00 3.263 4 Bedroom .702 1.043 .227 1.27 .41 2.20 4.582 Low Density Apartment (to 15/acre): Efficiency 1.00 1.00 1 Bedroom • .070 .053 .016 .069 1.42 1.559 2 Bedroom .357 .246 .043 .289 .063 1.85 2.559 3 Bedroom .475 .445 .123 .568 .240 2.00 3.283 4 Bedroom .500 .750 .170 .920 .330 2.10 3.850 High Density Apartments (16+/acre): Efficiency 1.00 1 Bedroom .05 .031 .009 .040 .007 1.26 1/11/77 I.S.C.S. 2 Bedroom .21 .077 .023 .100 .029 1.43 3 Bedroom .43 .177 .053 .230 .092 2.00 LAND-CASH CONTRIBUTION "TABLE YORKVILLE POPULATION RECOMMENDED COST PER UNIT COST UNIT COST COMMUNITY INCREASE SITE SIZES ACRE SITE COSTS COST PER PER 3. 7 P/U PER 2. 1P/U FACILITIES TO 1995 (ACRES) IMPROVED IMPROVED PERSON SINGLE/FAMILY MULTI FAMI: . 67 P/U-S . F. 11Ac/ 600 Cap. $ 165000 $184 S-S . F. I ELEM. , .40 P/U-M.F . $110/S-S . F . SCHOOL J . H. S • 20 P U-S . F . 28Ac/ 750 Cap. $15, 00,0 $ 420 , 000 $112 /S-S . F . $445 . 00 $211 . 00 . 10 P U-M. F . 56 S-M. F. H. S . . 33 P/U-S . F. 45Ac/1500 Cap. $ 675 , 000 $149 /S-S .F . . 10 P /U-M. F . $ 45 /S-M. F. PARK. 11, 400 74 . 1 $15 ,000 $1, 111 , 500 $ 97 . 50 $ .369.00 $'209.00 w ` 6 . 5Ac/1000 TOTALS 11 400 WILL 158. 1 SMALLER $2,371,500 ---- $814.00 $420.00 TRACTS WILL a-o2 T MOOR PER ACRE. Cl),* Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number Jam ` Legal ❑ NB #4 1836 Finance ❑ esr. � Engineer El Tracking Number -� tq City Administrator ❑ �O Consultant ❑ EDC 2011-44 <LE ��'�. ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Ordinance for ComEd Meeting and Date: EDC-November 1, 2011 Synopsis: Requires that ComEd must require that a city inspection be made before any release of electrical services. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: N/A Item Number: N/A Type of Vote Required: Informational Council Action Requested: None Submitted by: Mark A. Hardin , CBO, MCP Building Inspection Name Department Agenda Item Notes: C/r� J O Memorandum EST. ; t 1836 To: Economic Development Committee OSn,� Q From: Mark Hardin, Building Code Official CC: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director It E �� Date: October 27, 2011 Subject: Ordinance for ComEd We are requesting that ComEd not release the electrical services on any change of occupancy on any commercial occupancy. The current ordinance requires that anytime an existing occupancy is changed, the new occupant must come to City Hall and fill out the Certificate of Occupancy Change form and get an inspection by the City of Yorkville and the Kendall Bristol Fire Department. We are asking that ComEd not release the services until the occupant obtains a Certificate of Occupancy and we are able to make an inspection of the location, business type, and zoning, prior to the release of electrical services. Draft 10/20/11 Ordinance No. 2011- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, REQUIRING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PRIOR TO THE TRANSFER OF ELECTRIC UTILITY SERVICE FOR A NEW OR DIFFERENT BUSINESS USE WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5/11-30-4 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-30-4) the City may adopt rules and regulations for the construction, alteration, maintenance and occupancy of all property, buildings and structures in the City and in addition pursuant to its powers to protect the public's health, welfare and safety this Ordinance is adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That Title 8, Chapter 2, Section 8-2-2 of the Yorkville City Code, as amended,be and is hereby amended by adding subsection C to read as follows: "C. Whenever a certificate of occupancy for a business use is required pursuant to Section 10-14-4A of this City Code, it shall be unlawful for a public electric utility service provider in the City to transfer the electrical service to a new or different business customer without receiving notice from the City that the City has issued a certificate of occupancy for the building or portion thereof to be occupied by that business customer's use." Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2011. CITY CLERK 1 ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING GEORGE GILSON JR. JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO MARTY MUNNS CHRISFUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2011. MAYOR 2 ♦,��D C/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J= '' 0A Legal ❑ NB #5 EST. � � 1836 Finance ❑ Engineer ❑ 0 �� City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number �O Consultant ❑ EDC 20011-45 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Economic Development Committee Meeting Schedule for 2012 Meeting and Date: EDC 11/1/11 Synopsis: Tentative Meeting Dates for 2012 Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Approval by Economic Development Committee Submitted by: Lisa Pickering Clerk's Office Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Copy J� Memorandum ."� EST. 1836 To: Economic Development Committee �� From: Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk �« 5 Date: October 26, 2011 Subject: Economic Development Committee Meeting Schedule for 2012 CE The Clerk's Office is in the process of publishing the City's master meeting list for 2012. Listed below is a tentative schedule for the Economic Development Committee meetings for 2012. The proposed schedule has the Economic Development Committee meeting the 1St Tuesday of each month at 6:30 p.m. Please discuss this schedule at the Economic Development Committee meeting and decide if you have any changes to the dates or meeting time. Economic Development Committee 1" Tuesday— 6:30 pm January 3 July 3 February 7 August 7 March 6 September 4 April 3 October 2 May 1 November 6 June 5 1 December 4