More
Help
About
Sign Out
No preview available
/
Fit window
Fit width
Fit height
400%
200%
100%
75%
50%
25%
View plain text
This document contains no pages.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Economic Development Packet 2011 06-07-11
'��D CITY ?` © United City of Yorkville 15 0 800 Game Farm Road EST 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 0 I. p Telephone: 630-553-4350 <am Fax: 630-553-7575 AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, June 7, 2011 6:30 p.m. City Hall Conference Room Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: March 7, 2011 Items Recommended by Plan Commission/ZBA for Approval: New Business: 1. EDC 2011-11 Building Permit Report for February&March 2011 2. EDC 2011-18 Building Permit Report for April 2011 3. EDC 2011-12 Building Inspection Report Summary for February&March 2011 4. EDC 2011-19 Building Inspection Report Summary for April 2011 5. EDC 2011-13 Digital Billboard Signs—Discussion 6. EDC 2011-15 Zoning Commission— Status Update 7. EDC 2011-16 Foreclosure Update Report for March and April 2011 8. EDC 2011-20 Building Code Update Committee Proposed Recommendations 9. EDC 2011-21 Dormant Zoning Application/Petitions—Discussion 10. EDC 2011-22 Development Fee Research—Discussion 11. EDC 2011-23 EDC Meeting Date and Time Old Business: Additional Business: 2010/2011 City Council Goals Economic Develo ment Committee Goal Elected Officials Staff Tourism. Krysti Barksdale-Noble/ Glory Spies Economic development. Golinski/Munns Krysti Barksdale-Noble/ Bart Olson Downtown re-development. Golinski Krysti Barksdale-Noble/ Bart Olson Integrated Transportation Plan implementation. Golinski Krysti Barksdale-Noble/ Laura Schraw UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, June 7, 2011 6:30 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. March 7, 2011 ❑ Approved ❑ As presented ❑ As amended --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2011-11 Building Permit Report for February&March 2011 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2011-18 Building Permit Report for April 2011 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2011-12 Building Inspection Report Summary for February&March 2011 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2011-19 Building Inspection Report Summary for April 2011 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. EDC 2011-13 Digital Billboard Signs—Discussion ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. EDC 2011-15 Zoning Commission— Status Update ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. EDC 2011-16 Foreclosure Update Report for Marchand April 2011 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. EDC 2011-20 Building Code Update Committee Proposed Recommendations ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. EDC 2011-21 Dormant Zoning Applications/Petitions—Discussion ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. EDC 2011-22 Development Fee Research—Discussion ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. EDC 2011-23 EDC Meeting Date and Time ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 i o J a T Legal ❑ Minutes Finance ❑ EST. 1 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ °^Y `O Public Works ❑ Ken Call County El`E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the Economic Development Committee—March 7, 2011 Meeting and Date: EDC—June 7, 2011 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Committee Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Clerk's Office Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Monday, March 7, 2011, 6:30pm City Conference Room In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Gary Golinski Alderman Rose Spears Alderman Wally Werderich Other City Officials City Administrator Bart Olson Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Building Code Official Paul Zabel Other Guests Tony Scott, Kendall County Record Lynn Dubajic, YEDC The meeting was called to order by Chairman Gary Golinski at 6:30pm and he welcomed all attendees. Minutes for Correction/Approval December 7, 2010 The minutes were approved as read. Items Recommended by Plan Commission for Approval: None New Business 1. EDC 2011-01 Downtown Merchants Association Discussion Chairman Golinski said there is a group of downtown merchants who wish to revive the Merchants Association and they have held two meetings. He asked that this be tabled until next month to allow the merchants to be notified of the EDC meetings. 2. EDC 2011-06 Building Permit Report for November and December 2010 and January 2011 There was no discussion 3. EDC 2011-07 Building Inspection Report Summary for November& December 2010 and January 2011 No discussion 4. EDC 2011-04 Foreclosure Update—2010 Summary 5. EDC 2011-08 Foreclosure Update for January and February 2011 Ms. Barksdale-Noble said there were peaks and valley in the 2010 foreclosures and 2011 is starting the same. She said the inventory is beginning to level off. It was noted 1 there about 400 bank-owned properties in the City at this time. The committee had a brief discussion about current conditions and possible future requirements for home- buying. It was noted that there are currently 6600 rental units in Yorkville with about 740 of those in some state of foreclosure or bank-owned, etc. 6. EDC 2011-05 Grainco FS— TIF Assistance Application Chairman Golinski and Lynn Dubajic asked for advance notification to this committee whenever TIF Applications are received. Ms. Olson said there are no development plans at this time for the property, however, he would bring these matters forward in the future. It was reported that Grainco wants to demolish buildings for marketability of the property. Attorney Orr has spoken with Grainco and they requested money upfront. However, a development plan must be present and there is no front-funding. Ms. Dubajic asked if there is a list of eligible reimbursement costs. Ms. Barksdale-Noble will forward an available list to her. Grainco has agreed to re-develop the site by December 31, 2014. Chairman Golinski summarized that this piece of property could be very instrumental in kick-starting the downtown. 7. EDC 2011-09 Proposed Developer/Petitioner Deposit Account Form Ms. Barksdale-Noble developed a standardized petitioner account form. This was in response to previous issues related to tracking developer petitions and deposit accounts. The form would advise petitioners of the process and require a sign-off holding the individual financially responsible. She requested feedback from the committee and they agreed this was a good tool. The Attorney and Finance Director have reviewed this. 8. EDC 2011-10 Ordinance Regarding Fee Schedule for Zoning Applications/Petitions Currently, City fees are found in various parts of the City Code. The zoning-related fees will not change, but will be placed in one spot. Any changes would be in amendment form. This will move to the March 22nd City Council meeting. Old Business 1. EDC 2010-23 Telecommunications Tower Fees This is a draft ordinance for tower fees and will be moved to the March 22nd Council meeting. Chairman Golinski noted an article that said cell towers might become obsolete and be replaced by smaller antennas mounted on light poles. Additional Business There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 6:54pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young 2 C/T y Reviewed By: J� O Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ NB #1 EST. �Z 1836 Engineer ❑ [l� li` City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number °°°oys O Consultant ❑ `°°°" ❑ EDC 2011-11 �4L.E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Monthly Permit Activity Report(February&March 2011) Meeting and Date: EDC—June 7, 2011 Synopsis: All permits issued in the month of February, 2011 Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Paul Zabel Building and Zoning Name Department Agenda Item Notes: O�D c1TY r UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT REPORT February 2011 Number of • ✓ r r — SFD ,, SSA lVinl�t�-Fazxul Ca>rl;mcrc>tal Industrial Misc. tronstruction � Permit Forrn rl_'w ,ern=le t°vpjily 5°i1t.'k j"'rlydrih r),,,rtrr'rm 1, r=1ul,:,s I{I r coot Le. .4. .• � II.IrrJr, 1:55 u('sl 11,11 1�4�acd l�riiiri� 1r•I�.:h.�;i t'{�i�r{+!rnrrriwrn �'rrl��r're,s'rrl+f^si ' I February 2011 11 0 0 0 6 0 5 29,451.00 822.00 Calendar Year 19 0 0 0 9 0 10 71.562.00 1,424.00 2011 Fiscal Year 2011 458 27 6 0 97 0 328 10,859,809.00 393,305.86 February 2010 17 4 0 0 9 0 4 1,221,270.00 35,745.47 Calendar Year 46 7 0 0 18 0 21 2,126,145.00 65,270.15 2010 Fiscal Year 2010 463 53 8 0 118 0 284 26,738,043.00 722,541.63 February 2009 20 - 0 0 0 10 - 0 - -10 405,594.00 8,974.00 Calendar Year 36 1 0 0 20 0 15 955,0400 17.336.50 2009 Fiscal Year 2009 603 75 38 0 180 0 310 59,119,383.00 1.435,718.36 February 2008 39 8 0 0 23 0 8 5,124,842.00 150,546.66 Calendar Year 82 14 0 0 41 0 27 6,327,191.00 208,612.32 2008 Fiscal Year 2008 973 178 100 5 272 0 418 107,124,906.00 4,837.998.50 Prepared by D Weinert UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE EMW 1835 BUILDING PERMIT REPORT °�'f��� ;� _=o March 2011 -Number of SFD SFA Multi-Family -- Commercial WusiriaI Misc, Construction Permit CCft7a�1 Snq:ii 1-rrrrr�!'i tirrjW,: :+r fr v1parwreew. f r+:.l refj',if'1fff'h4'frlvrrf4^rlror Cost Fees Issued 01ri^,{rrP I!!rrrf?er°� C' :le;rrunr.rrn! (nrnruerzl��!l.;r: March 2011 47 6 0 0 9 0 32 1.122381.00 68,182.68 Calendar Year 66 6 0 0 18 0 42 1.194.343.00 69,707.18 2011 Fiscal Year 2011 506 33 6 0 107 0 360 11,982,590.00 462,268.34 - 2 March 2010 46 5 0 0 7 0 34 2,576,358.00 44,533.67 Calendar Year 92 12 0 0 25 0 55 4,702,503.00 108,553.82 2010 Fiscal Year 2010 509 58 8 0 125 0 318 29,314,401.00 765,225.30 5-1-09 then 3-31-10 March 2009 40 3 0 0 22 0 15 3,961,170.00 83,686.36 Calendar Year 76 4 0 0 42 0 30 4,916,214.00 101,022.86 2009 Fiscal Year 2009 643 112 4 0 202 0 325 63,080,553.00 1,519,404.72 5-1-08 thru 3-31-09 March 2008 70 6 2 0 38 0 24 3,347,201.00 112,990.18 Calendar Year 154 22 2 0 79 0 51 10,246,212.00 334,596.50 2008 Fiscal Year 2008 1045 186 102 0 310 0 446 111,043,927.0 4,513,982.68 5-1-07 lhru 3-31-08 p Prepared by a Weinert C/T y Reviewed By: J� O Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ NB #2 EST. �Z 1836 Engineer ❑ [l� li` City Administrator ❑ � Tracking Number °°°oys O Consultant ❑ `°°°" ❑ EDC 2011-18 �4L.E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Monthly Permit Activity Report(April 2011) Meeting and Date: EDC—Tuesday, June 7th, 2011 Synopsis: All permits issued in the month of April, 2011 Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Paul Zabel Building and Zoning Name Department Agenda Item Notes: D f r FS o E s UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE _— BUILDING PERMIT REPORT April 2011 4.r; — - Permit Number of SFD SFA Multi-Fly Commercial Industrial ,' Misc. Construction Permits Single ram 0y ,din gk ir=arrjih Argrr n w h krrflidai a111°erneifa Asdial f br Cost Fees l ltd 1?�41'f#rrr ldrjclly ' Covidfurrineurm Commercial Use I April 2011 64 0 0 0 8 0 56 260,575.00 4.731,20 Calendar Year 130 6 0 0 26 0 98 1,454,918.00 74,598.38 2011 Fiscal Year 2011 570 33 6 0 115 0 416 12.243,165.00 467,359.54 April 2010 84 4 0 0 6 0 74 7,806,767.00 43,185.18 Calendar Year 176 16 0 0 31 0 129 12,509.270.00 151,739.00 2010 Fiscal Year 2010 593 62 6 0 131 0 394 37,121,168.00 808,410.48 April 2009 82 6 0 0 19 0 57 1,375,683.00 78.422.36 Calendar Year 158 10 0 0 61 0 87 6,291,897.00 179,445.22 2009 Fiscal Year 2009 725 84 38 0 221 0 382 64,456,236.00 1,597,827.08 April 2008 128 10 12 0 39 0 67 8,236,951.00 263.458.67 Calendar Year 282 32 14 0 118 0 118 18,483,163.00 597,945.17 2008 Fiscal Year 2008 1173 196 114 6 349 0 508 119280,878.00 4,777,331,35 Prepared by D Weinert C/T y Reviewed By: J� O Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ NB #3 EST. �Z 1836 Engineer ❑ [l� li` City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number °°°oys O Consultant ❑ `°°°" ❑ EDC 2011-12 �4L.E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Monthly Inspection Report Summary(February&March 2011) Meeting and Date: EDC—June 7, 2011 Synopsis: All inspections performed in the months of February and March 2011 Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Paul Zabel Building and Zoning Name Department Agenda Item Notes: EST 7636 °9 '" � < "Ins p ections February 2 711 ILE Type of inspection Single-Family Single-Tarnily Commercial Miscellaneous, RL—Inspections. (detached) (attached_) Monthly BKF- Backfill 0 0 0 0 0 0 BND Pool Bonding 0 0 0 0 0 0 BSM-Basement Floor 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRL-Crawl Space 0 0 0 0 0 0 FIN Final Inspection 4 0 3 2 2 9 FTG Footing 0 0 0 0 0 0 GAR-Garage Floor 1 0 0 0 0 1 INS-Insulation 4 0 0 1 1 5 OCC-Occupancy Inspection 0 0 0 0 0 0 OSR-Water Meter Reader 3 0 0 0 0 3 PH-Post Holes/Piles 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHD-Post Holes/Deck 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF-Post Holes/Fence 0 0 0 0 0 0 PPF-Pre-pour,Commercial Floor 0 0 0 0 0 0 PPS-Pre-pour,Slab-on-grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 PPW-Pre-pour,Wall Steel 0 0 0 0 0 0 REL-Rough Electrical 2 0 1 3 0 6 RFR-Rough Framing 3 0 0 1 1 4 RMC-Rough Mechanical 2 0 0 1 0 3 SPO-Spot Survey Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 STP-Stoop 0 0 0 0 0 0 TPL-Temporary Pool, Final 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRN -Trench (gas,electric,etc) 0 0 0 0 0 0 WPL-Wire Pull 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLU-Plumbing, Underslab 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLR-Plumbing,Rough 5 0 0 1 1 6 PLF-Plumbing, Final 5 0 2 0 3 7 RPZ-Plumbing, RPZ Valve 0 0 0 0 0 0 EDA-Engineering, Driveway Apron 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFL-Engineering, Final inspection 5 0 0 0 2 5 EPW-Engineering, Public Walk 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESS-Engineering,Storm Sewer 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESW-Engineering,Sewer/Water 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS... 34 0 6 9 10 49 - Inspected,by.» Paul Zabel 22 D.Weinert 0 Joe Wywrot 0 Darrell Busch 9 Jackie Dearborn 3 H2O(Water Department) 3 "B&F"(Plumbing) 0 "TPI"(Plumbing) 12 "ICCI" 0 TOTALS... 49 DATE: 03/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 10:22:23 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.wow INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2011 TO 02/28/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -- 11 ------------------------- ------------------------ ----------- 20100233 09/29/2010 2262 EMERALD DR SFD ACS EFL JD 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100369 09/08/2010 2351 EMERALD LN SFD ACS OSR H2O 02/18/2011 02/18/2011 P ACS EFL JD 02/22/2011 02/22/2011 F ACS FIN PZ 02/22/2011 02/22/2011 P ACS PLF TPI 02/22/2011 02/22/2011 F ACS PLF TPI 02/23/2011 02/23/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100382 07/30/2010 384 BERTRAM DR SFD B81 FIN PZ 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 P BB1 PLF TPI 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 P 20100446 09/08/2010 1162 KATE DR SFD HEC FIN PZ 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 F HEC EFL DB 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 F HEC PLF TPI 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 F HEC OSR H2O 02/15/2011 02/15/2011 P HEC EFL DB 02/15/2011 02/15/2011 P REINSPECTION HEC FIN PZ 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 P REINSPECTION HEC PLF PZ 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100513 10/07/2010 2558 EMERALD LN SFD ACS OSR H2O 02/18/2011 02/18/2011 P ACS EFL JD 02/22/2011 02/22/2011 F 20100540 10/20/2010 1356 SPRING ST SFD HEC GAR DB 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 P 20100553 10/26/2010 2343 LAVENDER WAY SFD ACS RFR PZ 02/03/2011 02/0312011 F ACS REL PZ 02/03/2011 02/03/2011 P ACS RMC PZ 02/03/2011 02103/2011 P ACS PLR TPI 02/03/2011 02/03/2011 F ACS INS PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P ACS RFR PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P REINSPECTION ACS PLR TPI 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P 20100554 10/26/2010 2333 LAVENDER WAY SFD ACS INS DB 02/0112011 02/01/2011 P ACS PLR TPI 02/01/2011 02/01/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100555 10/26/2010 2353 LAVENDER WAY SFD ACS RFR PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P ACS REL PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P ACS RMC PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P ACS PLR TPI 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 F ACS INS DB 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 F ACS PLR TPI 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 P ACS INS DB 02/11/2011 02/11/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100563 11/24/2010 1185 N BRIDGE ST CRM BLD REL PZ 02/01/2011 02/01/2011 P BLD FIN PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 F BLD PLF TPI 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 F BLD FIN PZ 02/09/2011 02/02/2011 P REINSPECTION BLD PLF TPI 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 P REINSPECTION DATE: 03/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 10:22:23 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2011 TO 02/2812011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT N DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -----_ e_., ------------------------------------------- 20100613 12/13/2010 2501 EMERALD LN BSM BLD REL PZ 02/01/2011 02/01/201:1 P 20100616 11/1712010 1873 WALSH DR DCK DCK FIN DB 02/23/2011 02/23/2011 P 20110004 01/31/2011 1173 CODY CT BSM BLD PLR TPI 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 F BLD RFR PZ 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 P BLD REL PZ 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 P BLD RMC PZ 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 P BLD INS AB 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 P 20110009 01/20/2011 4631 PLYMOUTH AVE FNC FNC FIN DB 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P 20110013 02/1112011 1955 MARKETVIEW DR CCO OCC FIN PZ 02/18/2011 02/18/2011 P 20110016 02/09/2011 701 HEUSTIS ST ELE ELE REL PZ 02110/2011 02/10/2011 P DATE: 03/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 10:22:23 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2011 TO 02/26/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 6 CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 1 CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 5 DCK DECK 1 ELE ELECTRICAL UPGRADE 1 FNC FENCE 1 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 34 INSPECTION SUMMARY: EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 5 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 9 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 1 INS INSULATION 5 OSR WATER METER READER 3 PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 7 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 6 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 6 RFR ROUGH FRAMING 4 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 3 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: DB DARRELL BUSCH 9 H2O WATER DEPT 3 JD JACKIE DEARBORN 3 PZ PAUL ZABEL 22 TPI TPI INSPECTION SERVICES 12 STATUS SUMMARY: C DB 1 C PZ 5 C TPI 2 I DB B I H2O 2 I JD 1 I PZ 15 I Tex 7 • H2O 1 • JD 2 • PZ 2 • TPI 3 REPORT SUMMARY: 49 =`019 CI). i EST. t&1s I1T �l Inspections March 2411 Type of Inspection Slft&-Family Single-Family Commercial IVllscellaneous Re-Inspertions tdetached) (attached) --Monthly BKF- Backfill 2 0 0 0 0 2 BND-Pool Bonding 0 0 0 0 0 0 BSM -Basement Floor 1 0 0 0 0 1 CRL-Crawl Space 0 0 0 0 0 0 FIN-Final Inspection 1 0 3 4 0 13 FTG-Footing 2 0 0 1 0 3 GAR-Garage Floor 0 0 0 0 0 0 INS-Insulation 2 0 0 2 1 4 OCC-Occupancy Inspection 0 0 0 0 0 0 OSR-Water Meter Reader 1 0 0 0 0 1 PH-Post Hales/Piles 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHD-Post Holes/Deck 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF-Post Holes/Fence 0 0 0 1 0 1 PPF-Pre-pour,Commercial Floor 0 0 0 0 0 0 PPS-Pre-pour,Slab-on-grade 0 0 0 3 0 3 PPW-Pre-pour,Wall Steel 0 0 0 1 0 1 REL-Rough Electrical 1 0 0 5 0 6 RFR-Rough Framing 1 0 0 2 0 3 RMC Rough Mechanical 1 0 0 1 0 2 SPO Spot Survey Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 STP-Stoop 0 0 0 0 0 0 TPL-Temporary Pool, Final 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRN Trench(gas,electric,etc) 0 0 0 0 0 0 WPL Wire Pull 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLU-Plumbing, Underslab 1 0 0 0 0 1 PLR-Plumbing, Rough 1 0 0 1 0 2 PLF-Plumbing, Final 1 0 0 7 3 8 RPZ-Plumbing, RPZ Valve 0 0 0 0 0 0 EDA-Engineering,Driveway Apron 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFL-Engineering, Final Inspection 1 0 0 3 1 4 EPW-Engineering, Public Walk 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESS-Engineering,Storm Sewer 1 0 0 0 0 1 ESW-Engineering,Sewer/Water 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTALS... 19 1 0 3 1 36 1 5 58 Inspected by... Paul Zabel 21 D.Weinert 0 Joe Wywrot 0 Darrell Busch 20 Jackie Dearborn 5 H2O(Water Department) 1 "B&F"(Plumbing) 0 "TPI"(Plumbing) 11 TOTALS... 58 DATE: 04'/29/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 11:15:03 INSPECTION REPORT ID'- PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2011 TO 03/31/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20090002 01/08/2009 405 SHADOW WOOD DR. REM BLD EFL DB 03/22/2011 03/22/2011 P 20100025 01/29/2010 2959 GRANDE TRAIL RCO OCC EFL JD 03/14/2011 03/14/2011 P 20100340 06/30/2010 42 W COUNTRYSIDE PKWY CCO OCC FIN PZ 03/08/2011 03/08/2011 P 20100540 10/20/2010 1358 SPRING ST SFD HEC FIN PZ 03/09/2011 03/09/2011 P HEC PLF TPI 03/09/2011 03/09/2011 P HEC OSR H2O 03/08/2011 03/08/2011 P HEC EFL DB 03/09/2011 03/09/2011 P 20100573 12/13/2010 207 HILLCREST AVE REM BPI REL PZ 03110/2011 03/10/2011 P BPI FIN PZ 03/23/2011 03/23/2011 P BPI PLF TPI 03/23/2011 03/23/2011 P 20100613 12/13/2010 2501 EMERALD LN BSM BLD FIN PZ 03/08/2011 03/08/2011 P 20100621 12/01/2010 821 PARKSIDE LN BSM BSM FIN PZ 03/14/2011 03/15/2011 P 20100623 12/08/2010 469 KELLY AVE SFD RIV PLR TPI 03/03/2011 03/03/2011 P RIV PLU TPI 03/03/2011 03/03/2011 P RIV RFR PZ 03/07/2011 04/07/2011 P ATV REL PZ 03/07/2011 04/07/2011 P RIV RMC PZ 03/07/2011 04/07/2011 P RIV INS PZ 03/11/2011 03/11/2011 F RIV INS DB 03/15/2011 03/15/2011 P RIV BSM DB 03/21/2011 03/21/2011 P 20100644 12/20/2010 221 W ELIZABETH ST ELE ELE REL PZ 03/22/2011 03/22/2011 P 20110012 02/09/2011 4524 MARQUETTE ST BSM BLD REL PZ 03/03/2011 03/03/2011 P BLD RFR PZ 0310312011 03/03/2011 P BLD INS PZ 03/08/2011 03/08/2011 P REINSPECTION 20110019 02/22/2011 308 COLTON ST REM BLD REL PZ 03125/2011 03/25/2011 P BLD RFR PZ 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P BLD PLR TPI 03/28/2011 03/28/2011 P BLD INS DB 03/28/2011 03/28/2011 P BLD RMC PZ 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P 20110020 03/14/2011 1585 CORAL DR SFD ACS FTG DB 03/17/2011 03/17/2011 P ACS BKF DB 03/22/2011 03/22/2011 P ACS ESW JD 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P 20110021 03/14/2011 2548 EMERALD LN SFD ACS FTG DB 03/17/2011 03/17/2011 P ACS BKF DB 03/22/2011 03/22/2011 P ACS ESW JD 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P ACS ESS JP 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P 20110022 02/15/2011 1901 S BRXDGE ST CCO OCC FIN PZ 03/30/2011 03/30/2011 P 20110025 02/22/2011 534 BLUESTEM LN RCO OCC FIN PZ 03/02/2011 03/02/2011 P OCC PLF TPI 03/02/2011 03/02/2011 F OCC PLF TPI 03/03/2011 03/03/2011 F REINSPECTION OCC PLF TPI 03/09/2011 03/09/2011 P OCC EFL JD 03110/2011 03/10/2011 P REINSPECTION 20110031 03/03/2011 301 E HYDRAULIC CCO OCC FIN DB 03/22/2011 03/22/2011 P 20110033 03/02/2011 516 POWERS CT A FNC FNC PHF DB 03/11/2011 03/11/2011 P 20110037 03/08/2011 302 E PARK ST ROF ROF FIN DB 03/17/2011 03/17/2011 P DATE: 04/29/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 11:15:03 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2011 TO 03/31/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------- 20110039 03/17/2011 1211 WILLOW WAY ADD BLD FTG DB 03/29/2011 03/29/2011 P BLD PPW DB 03/30/2011 03/30/2011 P 20110043 03/10/2011 521 CHESHIRE CT PTO PTO PPS DB 03/29/2011 03/29/2011 P 20110047 03/11/2011 462 TWINLEAF TR FNC FNC FIN DB 03/22/2011 03121/2011 P 20110051 03/14/2011 323 WINDETT RIDGE RE PTO PTO PPS DB 03/21/2011 03/21/2011 P 20110052 03/14/2011 681 OMAHA DR FNC FNC FIN DB 03/21/2011 03/21/2011 P 20110054 03/21/2011 304 E ORANGE ST ELE ELE REL PZ 03/29/2011 03/29/2011 P 20110060 03/18/2011 920 HAYDEN DR PTO PTO PPS DB 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P 20110064 03/21/2011 1557 ORCHID ST FNC FNC FIN DB 03/28/2011 03/25/2011 P 20110065 03/30/2011 405 SHADOW WOOD DR RCO OCC FIN PZ 03/23/2011 03/23/2011 P OCC PLF TPI 03/23/2011 03/23/2011 F OCC PLF TPI 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 F REINSPECTION OCC PLF TPI 03/29/2011 03/29/2011 P REINSPECTION DATE: 04/29/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 11:15:03 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2011 TO 03/31/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -------------------------------------------------------. ...-----------------------------.v,-----------._.._w..,_._--------- PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 2 BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 5 CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 3 ELE ELECTRICAL UPGRADE 2 FNC FENCE 4 PTO PATIO / PAVERS 3 RCO RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 10 REM REMODEL 9 ROF ROOFING 1 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 19 INSPECTION SUMMARY: BKF BACKFILL 2 BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 1 EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 4 ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 1 ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER 2 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 13 FTG FOOTING 3 INS INSULATION 4 OSR WATER METER READER I PHF POST HOLE - FENCE I PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 8 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 2 PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 1 PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 3 PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 1 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 6 RFR ROUGH FRAMING 3 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 2 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: DB DARRELL BUSCH 20 H2O WATER DEPT I JD JACKIE DEARBORN 5 PZ PAUL ZABEL 21 TPI TPI INSPECTION SERVICES 11 STATUS SUMMARY: C DB 7 C PZ 7 C TPI 4 I DB 13 I H2O I I JD 4 I PZ 14 I TPI 7 X JD 1 REPORT SUMMARY: 58 C/T y Reviewed By: J� O Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ NB #4 EST. �Z 1836 Engineer ❑ [l� li` City Administrator ❑ � Tracking Number °°°oys O Consultant ❑ `°°°" ❑ EDC 2011-19 �4L.E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Monthly Inspection Report Summary(April 2011) Meeting and Date: EDC—Tuesday, June 7th, 2011 Synopsis: All inspections performed in the month of April Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Paul Zabel Building and Zoning Name Department Agenda Item Notes: gU Cl,- `< ` J� .� C0A Esf %M "Ins ections " Aril 2011 Type of Inspection Single-Family Single-Family Commercial Miscellaneous Re-Inspections (detached) (attached) Monthly BKF-Backfill 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 BND-Pool Bonding 0 0 0 0 0 0 BSM-Basement Floor 4 0 0 0 0 4 CRL-Crawl Space 0 0 0 0 0 0 FIN-Final Inspection 1 0 2 12 0 1s FTG-Footing 3 0 0 3 0 6 GAR-Garage Floor 4 0 0 0 0 4 INS-Insuiation 1 0 0 1 0 2 OCC Occupancy Inspection 0 0 0 0 0 0 OSR Water Meter Reader 0 0 0 0 0 0 PH-Post Holes/Piles 0 0 0 3 0 3 PHD-Post Holes/Deck 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Post Holes/Fence 0 0 0 2 0 2 PPF Pre-pour,Commercial Floor 0 0 0 0 0 0 PPS-Pre-pour,Slab-on-grade 0 0 0 5 0 5 PPW-Pre-pour,Wall Steel 0 0 0 1 0 1 REL Rough Electrical 1 0 1 4 0 6 RFR-Rough Framing 1 0 2 7 0 10 RMC-Rough Mechanical 1 0 0 2 0 3 SPO-Spot Survey Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 STP-Stoop 4 0 0 0 0 4 TPL-Temporary Pool, Final 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRN-Trench(gas,electric,etc) 0 0 0 1 0 1 WPL-Wire Pull 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLU-Plumbing, Underslab 3 0 0 0 0 3 PLR-Plumbing, Rough 1 0 3 4 1 8 PLF-Plumbing, Final 1 0 0 2 0 3 RPZ-Plumbing, RPZ Valve 0 0 0 0 0 0 EDA Engineering,Driveway Apron 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 EFL Engineering, Final Inspection 1 0 0 12 3 13 EPW-Engineering, Public Walk 1 0 0 0 0 1 ESS-Engineering,Storm Sewer 1 0 0 0 0 1 ESW-Engineering,Sewer/Water 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTALS... 30 0 1 8 60 1 4 98 Inspected by.. Paul Zabel 28 D.Weinert 0 Joe Wywrot 0 Darrell Busch 43 Jackie Dearborn 12 H2O(Water Department) 0 "B&F"(Plumbing) 1 "TPI" (Plumbing) 14 "ICCI" 0 TOTALS... 9g DATE: 06/03/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 10:20:51 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2011 TO 04/3012011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20100254 06/04/2010 961 OMAHA DR PTO PTO PPS DB 04/04/2011 04/04/2011 P 20100429 10/0412010 762 OMAHA DR SFD HEC GAR DB 04/07/2011 04/07/2011 P HEC STP DB 04/07/2011 04/07/2017_ P 20100488 12/06/2010 2484 WAVERLY CIR DCK DCK PH PZ 04/28/2011 04/28/2011 P 20100508 09/22/2010 1163 WESTERN LN AGP AGP REL PZ 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 P 20100514 10/07/2010 2337 EMERALD LN SFD ACS PLR TPI 04/O6/2011 04/06/2011 P ACS RFR PZ 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P ACS REL PZ 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P ACS RMC PZ 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P ACS INS DB 04/11/2011 04/11/2011 P 20100532 10/07/2010 362 BERTRAM DR SFD BB1 FIN PZ 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 P BBI PLF TPI 04/18/2011 04/1B/2011 P BB1 EFL DB 04/19/2011 04/19/2011 F 20100540 10/20/2010 1358 SPRING ST SFD HEC EPW JD 04/12/2011 04/12/2011 P 20100551 10/05/2010 1141 KATE DR RCO OCC EFL DB 04/18/2011 04118/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100601 11/05/2010 1163 WESTERN LN DCK DCK RFR DB 04/26/2011 04/26/2011 P 20100623 12/08/2010 469 KELLY AVE SFD RIV BSM DB 04/14/2011 04/14/2011 P 20100628 12/01/2010 1876 WILD INDIGO LN DCK DCK RFR DB 04/12/2011 04/1212011 P 20110011 03/04/2011 634 W VETERANS PKWY C REM BLD FIN PZ 04/28/2011 04/28/2011 P 20110018 03/25/2011 76 W COUNTRYSIDE PKWY CRM BLD REL PZ 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 P BLD RFR PZ 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 P BLD PLR TPI 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 F BLD PLR TPI 04/21/2011 04/21/2011 P REINSPECTION 20110019 02/22/2011 308 COLTON ST REM BLD FIN PZ 04/29/2011 04/29/2011 P BLD PLF TPI 04/29/2011 04/29/2011 P 20110020 03/14/2011 1585 CORAL DR SFD ACS PLU TPI 04/01/2011 04/01/2011 P ACS BSM DB 04/05/2011 04/0512011 P ACS STP DB 04/05/2011 04/05/2011 P ACS GAR DB 04/05/2011 04/05/2011 P 20110021 03/14/2011 2548 EMERALD LN SFD ACS PLU TPI 04/0112011 04/01/2011 P ACS BSM DB 04/05/2011 04/05/2011 P ACS GAR DB 04105/2011 04105/2011 P ACS STP DB 04/05/2011 04/05/2011 P 20110030 03/17/2011 301 E HYDRAULIC FNC FNC PHF DB 04/11/2011 04111/2011 P 20110032 03/01/2011 323 WINDETT RIDGE RD SHD SHD FIN DB 04/08/2011 04/11/2011 P 20110034 04/04/2011 101 W VAN EMMON ST CRM BPI PLR TPI 04/08/2011 04/08/2011 F BPI RFR PZ 04/19/2011 04/19/2011 P 20110039 03/17/2011 1211 WILLOW WAY ADD BLD BKF PZ 04/01/2011 04/01/2011 P BLD RFR PZ 04/27/2011 04/27/2011 P BLD REL PZ 04/27/2011 04/27/2011 P BLD PLR TPx 04/27/2011 04/27/2011 P BLD RMC PZ 04/27/2011 04/27/2011 P 20110040 03/29/2011 366 BERTRAM DR SFD BBI FTG DB 04/25/2011 04/25/2011 P 20110041 03/29/2011 345 BERTRAM DR SFD BB1 FTG DB 04/26/2011 04/26/2011 P 20110042 03/29/2011 392 BERTRAM DR SFD BBI FTG DB 04/05/2013, 04/05/2011 P BB1 BKF DB 04/12/2011 04/12/2011 P DATE: 06/03/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 10:20:51 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2011 TO 04/30/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP, DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BB1 ESW DB 04/13/2011 04/13/2011 P BB1 ESS DB 04/13/2011 04/13/2011 P BB1 PLU TPI 04/1812011 04/18/2011 P BB1 BSM DB 04/21/2011 04/21/2011 P BB1 STP DB 04/25/2011 04/21/2011 P BB1 GAR DB 04/25/2011 04/21/2011 P 20110046 03/31/2011 911 HAYDEN DR BSM BLD PLR TPI 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 F BLD PLR TPI 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P 20110048 03/14/2011 2959 GRANDE TRAIL RCO OCC EFL JD 04/01/2011 04/01/2011 P 20110053 04/1112011 504 BELL ST ELE ELE FIN PZ 04/19/2011 04/19/2011 P 20110058 03/15/2011 4574 HALFMOON DR A RCO OCC FIN PZ 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 P OCC PLF TPI 04/12/2011 04/12/2011 P 20110059 03/16/2011 2263 EMERALD LN FNC FNC FIN DB 04/04/2011 04/04/2011 P 20110062 03/29/2011 225 W. WHEATON AVENUE ANT BLD FTC PZ 04/05/2011 04105/2011 P BLD FTG DB 04/11/2011 04/11/2011 P BLD PPW DB 04/12/2011 04/12/2011 P BLD REL BF 04/13/2011 04/13/2011 P BLD FIN PZ 04/25/2011 04/25/2011 F 20110073 04/07/2011 105 E KENDALL DR DRV DRV PPS DB 04/26/2011 04/26/2011 P DRV FIN DB 04/27/2011 04/27/2011 P 20110074 04/19/2011 643 WHITE OAK WAY ADD BLD PH DB 04/21/2011 04/21/2011 P 20110075 03/29/2011 664 WHITE OAK WAY ROF ROF FIN DB 04/14/2011 04/14/2011 P 20110076 03/29/2011 101 W FOX ST ROF ROF FIN DB 04/14/2011 04/14/2011 P 20110077 03/29/2011 605 HEARTLAND DR FNC FNC PHF DB 04/07/2011 04/07/2011 P 20110062 03/3112011 1103 HAMPTON LN BSM BLD PLR TPI 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P BLD REL PZ 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P BLD RFR PZ 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 F BLD RFR PZ 04/08/2011 04/08/2011 P BLD RMC PZ 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P BLD INS DB 04/11/2011 04111/2011 P 20110083 04/07/2011 4058 BRADY ST RCO OCC EFL JD 04/14/2011 04114/2011 F 20110084 04/07/2011 4056 BRADY ST RCO OCC EFL JD 04/14/2011 04/14/2011 F OCC EFL JD 04/28/2011 04/28/2011 P REINSPECTION 20110085 04/07/2011 4042 BRADY ST RCO OCC EFL JD 04/14/2011 04/14/2011 F 20110086 04/07/2011 4038 BRADY ST RCO OCC EFL JD 04/14/2011 04/14/2011 F OCC EFL JD 04/28/2011 04/28/2011 P REINSPECTION 20110088 04/07/2011 2971 GRANDE TRAIL RCO OCC EFL JD 04/19/2011 04/19/2011 P 20110089 04/07/2011 2963 GRANDE TRAIL RCO OCC EFL JD 04/19/2011 04/19/2011 F 20110090 04/07/2011 2957 GRANDE TRAIL RCO OCC EFL JD 04/19/2011 04/19/2011 F 20110092 04/07/2011 2842 SILVER SPRINGS CT. RCO OCC EFL JD 04/19/2011 04/19/2011 P 20110094 04/01/2011 1141 KATE DR PTO PTO PPS DB 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 P 20110097 04/12/2011 4481 SARASOTA AVE OTH MSC RFR PZ 04/21/2011 04/21/2011 P 20110112 04/11/2011 689 DENISE CT DCK DCK PH DB 04113/2011 04/13/2011 P 20110113 04/07/2011 1617 COTTONWOOD TR ELE ELE TRN PZ 04/08/2011 04/08/2011 P 20110124 04/12/2011 2845 SILVER SPRINGS CT PTO PTO PPS DB 04/29/2011 04/29/2011 P 20110128 04/21/2011 624 W VETERANS PKWY A CCO OCC FIN PZ 04/27/2011 04/27/2011 P DATE: 06/03/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 10:20:51 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2011 TO 04/30/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS 20110143 04/2512011 494 WINTERBERRY DR DCK DCK FTG DB 04/26/2011 04/26/2011 P DCK RFR PZ 04/29/2011 04/2912011 F 20110145 04/19/2011 2366 LAVENDER WAY PTO PTO PPS DB 04/26/2011 04/26/2011 P 20110147 04/20/2011 494 E BARBERRY CIR ROF ROF FIN DB 04/25/2011 04/25/2011 P 20110148 04/20/2011 113 COLONIAL PKWY A ROF ROF FIN DB 04/26/2011 04/26/2011 P 20110153 04/28/2011 129 COMMERCIAL DR CCO OCC FIN PZ 04129/2011 04/29/2011 P DATE: 06/03/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 10:20:51 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2011 TO 04/30/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 6 AGP ABOVE-GROUND POOL 1 ANT ANTENNA / TOWER 5 BSM BASEMENT REMODEL $ CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 2 CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 6 DCK DECK 6 DRV DRIVEWAY 2 ELE ELECTRICAL UPGRADE 2 FNC FENCE 3 0TH OTHER 1 PTO PATIO / PAVERS 4 RCO RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 14 REM REMODEL 3 ROF ROOFING 4 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 30 SHD SHED 1 INSPECTION SUMMARY: BKF BACKFILL 2 BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 4 EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 13 EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK 1 ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 1 ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER I FIN FINAL INSPECTION 15 FTG FOOTING 6 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 4 INS INSULATION 2 PH POST HOLES / PILES 3 PHF POST HOLE - FENCE 2 PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 3 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 8 PLU PLUMBING UNDERSLAB 3 PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 5 PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 1 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 6 RFR ROUGH FRAMING 10 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 3 STP STOOP 4 TRN TRENCH - (GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC) 1 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: BF B&F TECHNICAL CODE SERVICE 1 DB DARRELL BUSCH 43 JD JACKIE DEARBORN 12 PZ PAUL ZABEL 28 TPI TPI INSPECTION SERVICES 14 DATE: 06/03/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 10:20:51 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2011 TO 04/30/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT R DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -------------------------------------------------.._----------------------------_-------_..... -----------_-_._--------------a......_------- STATUS SUMMARY: C DB 10 C JD 7 C PZ 3 C TPI 2 1 BF 1 1 DB 31 I JD 5 I PZ 23 I TPI 11 • DB 2 • PZ 1 • TPI 1 • PZ 1 REPORT SUMMARY: 98 DATE: 06/03/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 10:24:18 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2011 TO 04/30/2011 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: SFD ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS 20100429 10/04/2010 762 OMAHA DR SFD HEC GAR DB 04/07/2011 04/07/2011 P HEC STP DB 04/07/2011 04/07/2011 P 20100514 10/07/2010 2337 EMERALD LN SFD ACS PLR TPI 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P ACS RFR PZ 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P ACS REL PZ 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P ACS RMC PZ 04/06/2011 04/06/2011 P ACS INS DB 04/11/2011 04/11/2011 P 20100532 10/07/2010 362 BERTRAM DR SFD BB1 FIN PZ 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 P BB1 PLF TPI 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 P BB1 EFL DB 04/19/2011 04/19/2011 F 20100540 10/20/2010 1358 SPRING ST SFD HEC EPW JD 04/12/2011 04/12/2011 P 20100623 12/0812010 469 KELLY AVE SFD RIV BSM DB 04/14/2011 04/14/2011 P 20110020 03/14/2011 1585 CORAL DR SFD ACS PLU TPI 04/01/2011 04/01/2011 P ACS BSM DB 04/05/2011 04/05/2011 P ACS STP DB 04/05/2011 04/05/2011 P ACS GAR DB 04/05/2011 04/0512011 P 20110021 03/14/2011 2548 EMERALD LN SFD ACS PLU TPI 04/01/2011 04/01/2011 P ACS BSM DB 04/05/2011 04/0512011 P ACS GAR DB 04/05/2011 04/05/2011 P ACS STP DB 04/0512011 04/05/2011 P 20110040 03/29/2011 366 BERTRAM DR SFD BB1 FTG DB 04/25/2011 04/25/2011 P 20110041 03/29/2011 345 BERTRAM DR SFD BH1 FTG DB 04/26/2011 04/26/2011 P 20110042 03/29/2011 392 BERTRAM DR SFD BB1 FTG DB 04/05/2011 04/0512011 P BB1 BKF DB 04/12/2011 04/1212011 P BBl ESW DB 04/13/2011 04/13/2011 P 13B1 ESS DB 04/13/2011 04/13/2011 P BB1 PLU TPI 04/1812011 04/18/2011 P BB1 BSM DB 04/21/2011 04/21/2011 P BB1 STP DB 04/25/2011 04/21/2011 P BB1 GAR DB 04/25/2011 04/21/2011 P DATE: 06/03/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 10:24:18 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2011 TO 04/30/2011 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: SFD ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT % DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 30 INSPECTION SUMMARY: BKF BACKFILL I BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 4 EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 1 EPW ENGINEERING- PUBLIC WALK I ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 1 ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER 1 FIN FINAL INSPECTION I FTG FOOTING 3 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 4 INS INSULATION I PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 1 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 1 PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 3 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL I RFR ROUGH FRAMING I RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 1 STP STOOP 4 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: DB DARRELL BUSCH 20 JD JACKIE DEARBORN 1 PZ PAUL ZABEL 4 TPI TPI INSPECTION SERVICES 5 STATUS SUMMARY: I DB 1s I JD I I PZ 3 x TPI 4 T DB 2 T PZ 1 T TPI 1 REPORT SUMMARY: 30 DATE: 06/03/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 10:26:08 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/0112011 TO 04/30/2011 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: BOO CCO COM CRM ISSUE INSPECTION SCH£D. COMP. PERMIT N DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS 20110018 03/25/2011 76 W COUNTRYSIDE PKWY CRM BLD REL PZ 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 P BLD RFR PZ 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 P BLD PLR TPI 04/18/2011 04/18/2011 F BLD PLR TPI 04/21/2011 04/21/2011 P REINSPECTION 20110034 04/04/2011 101 W VAN EMMON ST CRM BP1 PLR TPI 04/08/2011 04/08/2011 F BP1 RFR PZ 04/19/2011 04/19/2011 P 20110128 04/2112011 624 W VETERANS PKWY A CCO OCC FIN PZ 04/27/2011 04/27/2011 P 20110153 04/28/2011 129 COMMERCIAL DR CCO OCC FIN PZ 04/29/2011 04/29/2011 P DATE: 06/03/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 10:26:0$ INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 04/01/2011 TO 04/30/2011 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: BDO CCO COM CRM ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT 4 DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 2 CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 6 INSPECTION SUMMARY: FIN FINAL INSPECTION 2 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 3 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 1 RFR ROUGH FRAMING 2 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: PZ PAUL ZABEL 5 TPI TPI INSPECTION SERVICES 3 STATUS SUMMARY: C PZ 2 C TPI 1 I PZ 3 I TPI 2 REPORT SUMMARY: a 0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ NB #5 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Tracking Number W City Administrator ■ °°°�°ov$edt `O Consultant ❑ County ❑ EDC 2011-13 Kentlall <4L.E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Digital Billboard Sign- Discussion Meeting and Date: EDC—June 7, 2011 Synopsis: Research compiled by staff at the request of the City Council regarding potential zoning provisions and revenue expected if LED digital billboard signs are permitted. Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 3/22/11 Action Taken: Budget Discussion Item Number: CC 2011-22 Type of Vote Required: None Action Requested: Direction Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memo. Memorandum EST. 1836 --�- To: Economic Development Committee 4 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator <LE ��'� Date: March 24, 2011 Subject: Digital LED Billboard Sign Research As requested during the March 22, 2011 City Council meeting budget discussion of alternative sources of revenue and policy options, staff has briefly researched various zoning regulations related to digital LED billboard signs. Below is a summary of that research and potential city revenue generated should they be permitted in Yorkville. Zoning & Regulatory Authority Research: Digital light emitting diode (LED) billboard signs utilize technology similar to high definition televisions, producing a vibrant digital color image allowing for changing billboard copy. Currently, Section 8-11-7 of the city's code strictly prohibits billboard signs anywhere in Yorkville. If that outright ban is lifted, the impact of permitting digital billboards along public streets and in public areas can be problematic if not effectively regulated. Upon review of various municipal ordinances recently passed, Title 92 of the Illinois Administrative Code Part 522 (IDOT) and information presented by the Federal Highway Administration in a memo dated September 25, 2007 (see attached), the primary areas for regulating digital LED billboard signs are: • Zoning District — Typically, billboard signs are permitted in non-residential zoning districts. However, billboard signs located within 660 feet along a Federal- Aid Primary (FAP) route are permitted only on property zoned and utilized for commercial or industrial uses.' Yorkville has four (4) FAP routes: Illinois 126 (FAP 326), Illinois Route 71 (FAP 311), US Route 30 (FAP 349), and US Route 34 (FAP 591).Attached is a map of potential locations for digital billboard signs on city-owned property located along a FAP route, some of which are currently zoned for commercial or industrial uses. • Luminosi . /Bri hg tness—most regulations established criteria for brightness levels of digital billboards to decrease the risk of glare or driver distraction. An acceptable maximum brightness for a digital billboard sign is no more than 0.3 foot-candles over ambient light levels measured within 150 feet of the sign.2 • Location — most ordinances determined the permissible location of digital LED billboards based upon safety considerations of the motoring public (street setbacks) and proximity to residential uses. o Distance and Placement — there is typically a minimum distance requirement between another billboard and a maximum number of ' Title 92 Illinois Administrative Code 522 Subchapter f(Department of Transportation) 2 Illuminating Engineering Society of North America(IESNA) billboards located within a linear mile along a roadway (regardless if on they are on opposite sides of the roadway). • Aesthetics/ Traffic Safety — both state and local ordinances reviewed establishes criteria for billboard sign and display appearance. Similar to most standard sign ordinances, most have bulk requirements and that the digital billboard sign not have moving or oscillating parts, blinking lights and are structurally sound. • Sign Area, Size and Height — billboard sign area or size is typically measured by the surface area of the copy and usually does not exceed 500 square feet. The average height for billboard signs is 35 feet above grade. • Length of Display Time & Transition between images — Digital billboard images usually adhere to the industry standard of 8-10 seconds for display time and transition between images within 2 seconds to minimize driver distraction.3 Benefits to Local Businesses & Community The economic impact to businesses within Yorkville should digital LED billboard signs be permitted was also researched. Significant benefits to small and medium sized businesses using digital LED billboards include: the flexibility to customize and update information in real- time; increased visibility than traditional wall or ground-mounted signs; and the ability to provide greater visual impact. They are also more cost-efficient than a conventional billboard, since digital billboards displays are purchased in increments of time rather than by overall ad space. Digital billboards can also offer a public service. Some communities have partnered with outdoor advertising companies to provide time and space for promoting government programs/information or for emergency announcements, such as missing persons and disaster alerts. Potential City Revenue Recently, there has been a renewed interest by some local governments to seek revenue from digital billboard ads. Local governments may approach revenue stream from digital billboards through building permit and inspection fees for sign construction; by collecting leasing fees from advertisers who install the signs on city-owned property; excise or use tax on revenue generated from ad sales; real estate taxes on assessed value of billboard signs; or a combination of the above. Recent examples of revenue generated by cities from billboards include: • Los Angeles, CA — in October 2010, city council proposed a 12% excise tax on billboards with an anticipated annual revenue stream of$24 million. • Philadelphia, PA — in 2005, the city approved a 7% tax on billboards within the city. • New York, New York—in November 2010, estimated that $22 million in revenue can be generated by collecting the lease fees for billboards located on city-owned property and real estate revenue for privately-owned parcels with billboards. 3 Source: Outdoor Advertising Association of America,Inc.and the National League of Cities. • Medford, MA—in June 2010 negotiated a deal with Clear Channel for a payment- in-lieu-of-taxes agreement that will generate $50,000 annually for the next 25 years for the use of city-owned property along an interstate. • Miami-Dade County — collects $220,000 in rental fees and 16% of the ad space revenue from a supersized digital billboard located on a county-owned eight-story building. However, digital billboard signs have not been without controversy, as a recent article in the February 2011 edition of PublicWorks4 reports that seven (7) states and as many as 23 cities and counties throughout the country have banned or are considering a moratorium on digital billboards. Staff Comments The City has received offers of interest to install LED digital billboard signs along some State routes in Yorkville. Staff is seeking direction from the EDC if we should pursue amending our current sign regulations to permit digital billboard signs; and if so, solicit bids from outdoor advertising companies to lease space on city-owned land for billboards. 4 www.pwma. Site ID PIN site-address Acres N 1 02-32-277-001 1.76 2 02-29-201-006 0.52 3 02-29-202-006 10.96 �S 4 05-05-443-016 - 4.37 5 02-04-300-005 4600 N Bridge St 2.10 6 05-04-402-010 1809 Country Hills Dr 2.05 7 05-04-401-018 1908 Raintree Rd 0.25 8 05-03-380-001 1148 Hawk Hollow Dr 2.14 30 9 05-04-101-008 109 Colonial Pkwy 0.24 10 05-05-400-024 - 0.06 11 02-33-154-020 - 0.03 12 02-32-283-009 - 0.11 13 02-32-278-007 201 W Hydraulic Ave 0.46 14 02-33-154-022 - 0.47 I 5 I 15 02-33-153-006 131 E Hydraulic Ave 0.06 t 16 02-33-153-008 131/201 E Hydraulic Ave 2.12 j 17 02-33-154-009 - 0.09 18 02-21-301-002 - 1.22 ! a 19 02-28-351-011 610 Tower Ln 0.49 20 02-29-427-002 910 Game Farm Rd 15.78 i 21 02-28-302-008 910 Game Farm Rd 7.47 22 02-30-203-002 1474 Sycamore Rd 3.53 23 02-30-101-002 1711 John St 8.07 24 02-21-301-012 1975 N Bridge St 1.00 25 02-28-351-020 610 Tower Ln 1.27 - 26 05-04-151-026 185 Wolf St 2.65 j I 27 05-05-276-004 193 Wolf St 1.34 _ _L; ........... I 28 02-28-126-010 202 ECountryside Pkwy 4.55 29 02-32-287-001 111 W Madison St 0.46 1 30 02-33-153-013 - 0.23 IL, 31 02-33-153-011 - 0.19 32 02-33-104-001 301 N Bridge St 2.36 33 02-32-283-008 1 West Alley 0.02 1 c� 34 02-30-101-001 1711 John St 8.72 24 3 - 34 '1 I 34 22 i 28 �. i 34 71 r_ I j -.._ .-.-_.._ 2 23 20 - - 21 I 19 25 32 31 30 14 13 .I 16 \ 33 1•i i 15 12 29 17 I ' 27 10 126 26 °� I 1 7 126 ------------------- � I r I I I I r� ,�. ♦ ! \ 47 71 ! I U I I r= II I Ij I Ij I I I I Legend PF 660' Buffer of State Highways City Properties Within Buffer December 2 10-United City of Yorkville GIS 0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ NB #6 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Agenda Item Tracking Number City Administrator ■ °°°�°ov$edt `O Consultant ❑ ❑ EDC 2011-15 Kentlall County `� <4L.E City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Zoning Commission— Status Report Meeting and Date: EDC—June 7, 2011 Synopsis: Report of ongoing activities related to the Zoning Commission and the comprehensive update of the zoning ordinance. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 12/07/10 Action Taken: None Item Number: EDC-2010-28 Type of Vote Required: N/A Council Action Requested: Informational Item Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memorandum. Cpl 0 Memorandum EST. � 1836 To: Economic Development Committee O ��� a=� ►� From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director N CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator <LE 1� Date: April 28, 2011 Subject: Zoning Commission— Status Report Since staff's last update to the EDC regarding the progress of the Zoning Commission, several chapters have been researched, reviewed, discussed and revised. The following highlights some of the Zoning Commission's proposed revisions to the chapters of the Zoning Ordinance: Table of Contents • Proposed new chapters with specific regulations for alternative energy systems (wind and solar); fences, screens and walls; and adult-oriented uses were included. Chapter 1: Zoning Purpose & Interpretation • Added more definitive language with regard to ensuring the provisions of the Subdivision Control Ordinance was also a consideration of the zoning process. • A severability clause was included to protect the integrity of the remaining sections of the ordinance should a portion of it be challenged in court. Chapter 2: Rules and Definitions • Updated several irrelevant or obsolete words or definitions, and incorporated newer terminology which reflects current policies, procedures or technology. Chapter 3: General Provisions • Some proposed revisions related to how home occupations are regulated which takes into consideration contemporary lifestyles, State authority over in-home daycare operations, and the increase of home-based professions/careers. • Incorporation of a table which clearly lists which accessory structures, buildings and obstructions are permitted in which required yard. Chapter 4: Zoning Administration and Enforcement • Significant revisions within this chapter includes updating the administrative and enforcement aspects of the zoning entitlement process (i.e., text and map amendments, special use approval, variances, 1.5 mile review) to bring it more in line with the actual practices and procedures of the City. Chapter 5: Zoning Districts and Maps • New zoning districts such as Historic Overlay District (HOD), Conservation Design District(CDD), and Open Space (OS) District have been proposed. 1 Chapter 6: Permitted and Special Uses • Incorporation of a new user-friendly format providing an overview of all the zoning districts' permitted and special uses in a single chart. This will be in addition to the traditional text list provided in the individual district chapters. • This chapter also focused on compliance with federal regulations related to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) ensuring equal treatment when designating religious assembly and non-religious assembly as permitted or special use. Chapter 7: Dimensional and Bulk Regulations • New chapter which provides a chart and graphic format all the zoning districts' regulations regarding minimum lot size, building setbacks, maximum height requirements, density, floor area ratio, etc. Chapter 8: Planned Unit Developments • The most significant proposed change to this chapter is the reversion back to establishing a Planned Unit Development as a Special Use rather than a district. This is in conformance with 65 ILCS 5/11-13-1.1 of the Illinois Statutes. The proposed revision to the Planned Unit Development Ordinance adopted in 2006, reorganizes and streamlines the review/approval process, as well as adds provisions to address current issues faced with stalled developments in a slow economy. There is also an added provision requiring the approval of a Final Plat for Planned Unit Developments which has been the City's practice, but does not currently exist in the ordinance. (Please refer to attached) Chapter 9: A-1 Agricultural District • The proposed revisions to the A-1 Agricultural District mainly update the list of permitted and special uses for the district based upon the previously revised Chapter 6 table. Also, the incorporation of modern sustainable farming techniques such as growing non-food crops for biof eels conversion and reforestation. As mentioned previously, a final written assessment report prepared by the Zoning Commission will be submitted to the EDC along with a recommendation for adoption of the new zoning ordinance at the conclusion of the review. The City Council will then conduct a public hearing soliciting citizen comments prior to voting on adopting the proposed revisions. Handouts and an informational meeting for the Zoning Board of Appeals and Plan Commission members summarizing the zoning ordinance changes will also be conducted by staff. 2 CHAPTER 8 Planned Unit Development SECTION: 10-13-1: Purpose and Intent 10-13-2: Authority 10-13-3: Definition and Size Limitations 10-13-4: Procedures for Establishment 10-13-5: Pre-Application Conference 10-13-6: Concept PUD Plan Review 10-13-7: Preliminary PUD Plat 10-13-8: Final PUD Plat 10-13-9: Amendments or Minor Revisions to PUD Plat 10-13-10: Conditions for Approval 10-13-11: Development Standards and Design Criteria 10-13-12: Fees 10-13-13: Separability 10-13-14: Effective Period of Planned Unit Development 10-13-15: Effective Date 1'0VW 10-13-1: PURPOSE AND INTENT: Planned Unit Developments are unique and differ substantially from conventional subdivisions and therefore require administrative processing as "Special Uses"under this Title. Planned Unit Developments are a complex type of Special Use, potentially consisting of various land uses and design elements, requiring the establishment of more specific procedures, standards and exceptions from the strict application of the zoning district regulations to guide the recommendations of the Plan Commission and the action of the City Council. The purpose of this chapter, therefore, is to provide for an alternative zoning procedure under which land can be developed or redeveloped with innovation, increased amenities and creative environmental and architectural design than would be possible to achieve under the otherwise standard zoning district regulations while being in general compliance with the planning objectives and intent of the zoning ordinance. Under this procedure, well planned residential, industrial/manufacturing, commercial and other types of land uses, individually or in combination, may be developed with design flexibility allowing for full utilization of the topographical and environmental characteristics of the site. Planned Unit Developments must have an approved development plan which provides for a unified design, contiguity between various elements and be environmentally compatible with the surrounding area. There should be an increased benefit upon the health, safety and general welfare of the public and particularly, in the immediate surroundings,than developments built in conformity with the underlying district regulations. If building density is increased above densities allowable by the zoning district in which the use would be permitted on a particular portion of a PUD;then the amount of open space,retention of existing vegetation, buffer areas, new landscape, public commons, community open space, and parks shall be evaluated for proportionate increase for the remainder of the PUD. The Planned Unit Development is not intended to be a mechanism solely used for the allowance of increased densities or as a means of circumventing the bulk regulations or zoning standards under this Title, 73 rather a Planned Unit Development shall generally provide attributes in excess of conventional city zoning, building and other land use requirements such as,but not limited to the following: A. Providing a maximum choice of the overall living environment through a variety of type, design and layout of residential structures, commercial and industrial buildings, office and research uses and public facilities; B.Demonstrating excellence in environmental design and the mitigation of land use factors or impacts; C.Promoting a more useful pattern of dedicated open space and recreation areas incorporated as part of the development plan and that is compatible with the immediate vicinity; D. Provide public access and pedestrian connectivity via bicycle/recreational paths, sidewalks and/or alternative modes of transportation. E. Providing and or preserving substantial landscaping with emphasis given to streetscape areas, buffer zones, and the provision of significant landscaping(in terms of size of landscape areas and quantity and quality of landscape materials)within the developed portions of the site; F. Incorporating a consistent architectural theme which is unique to the specific site and surrounding community through the use of building materials, signage and way-finding standards as well as design elements. Generic corporate architecture and big box designs are strongly discouraged but not prohibited.Uses should be designed according to the limitation of the site rather than the removal of the limitations. Specific design details such as roof parapets, architectural details, varying roof heights, pitches and materials and building colors and materials should be addressed; G. Retain, utilize and incorporate historic features on the project site into the overall project design, if physically and economically feasible;and/or H. Promote and strengthen the economic vitality and enhance the aesthetic qualities of unified large-scale commercial developments. I. Encourage high-quality planned industrial park environments and well-designed business centers for single or multiple-tenant facilities. J. Provide/enhance regional public infrastructure such as roadways, water/sanitary service, storm water management objectives. 10-13-2: AUTHORITY: A. The Plan Commission shall review and recommend approval, approval with modification or denial of applications for Planned Unit Developments. The City Council shall have final decision to approve, approve with modification,or deny applications for Planned Unit Developments. B. The procedures set forth in this chapter shall apply to all Planned Unit Developments. C. Planned Unit Developments may be allowed in each of the zoning districts in the United City of Yorkville only as a Special Use as prescribed in Chapter 6: Permitted and Special Uses and approved pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 10-4-9 of this Title. D. Bulk regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance shall not apply to Planned Unit Developments; provided, however, that the Off-Street Parking and Loading regulations set forth in Chapter 18 of this Title shall apply to all Planned Unit Developments. 74 10-13-3: DEFINITION AND SIZE LIMITATIONS: A Planned Unit Development is a tract of land which is developed as a unit under single ownership or control, which includes two (2) or more principal buildings, and which is at least four (4) acres in area, except for planned developments operated by a municipal corporation which shall be at least two (2) acres in area, and Planned Unit Developments in manufacturing districts which shall be at least ten(10) acres in area. All land area within a Planned Unit Development must be contiguous;provided that properties separated by highways, streets, public ways, railroads or other public utility right-of-ways may be deemed contiguous for the purpose of qualifying as a Planned Unit Development. Pursuant to the procedures set herein, the establishment of a Planned Unit Development shall be applicable to the addition of property to an existing Planned Unit Development. 10-13-4: PROCEDURES FOR ESTABLISHMENT: A. Planned Unit Development applications shall be made as hereinafter provided and shall be accompanied by the required plats and documents. Detailed plans, drawings and other information as specified in this Title shall be required at the time of the various phases, meetings and hearings as detailed herein.Each stage shall be reviewed and certified by the Zoning Administrator as being in accordance with the Planned Unit Development requirements before proceeding to the next stages. The approval process shall include the following stages: 1. Pre-Application Conference- Introductory meeting held with City staff as set forth in Section 10-13-5 of this Chapter. 2. Concept PUD Plan Review- An informal review of overall concept conducted by the City Council to provide constructive feedback to petitioner of plan as set forth in Section 10-13-6 of this Chapter. 3. Preliminary PUD Plat- First,a technical review of detailed plans by various city departments at a Plan Council meeting is held;a public hearing is then conducted by the Plan Commission;and final determination is made by the City Council,as set forth in Section 10-13-7 of this Chapter. 4. Final PUD Plat- A public hearing is then conducted by the Plan Commission with final determination made by the City Council, as set forth in Section 10-13-8 of this Chapter. B. The final two (2) stages of the PUD process, Preliminary PUD Plat and Final PUD Plat, may be submitted and reviewed concurrently, as determined by the Plan Council, based upon the following criteria: 1.The PUD plan forwards the goals of the city's planning objectives and official plans, including but not limited to, the Integrated Transportation Plan, Downtown Vision Plan, Stormwater Management Plan and various watershed development plans. 2.The PUD plan requires limited variances from the use or bulk regulations of the conventional/underlying zoning district in which it is to be located. 75 3.The benefits of the PUD plan should forward or exceed the goals of the development standards and regulations of city ordinances; including but not limited to, the Subdivision Control Ordinance, Landscape Ordinance, Sign Ordinance, Design Guidelines and Water Conservation Ordinance. 10-13-5: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE: A. Purpose: The purpose of the pre-application conference is to provide information, guidance and assistance to the applicant before preparation of the concept plan so that the applicant may receive informal input on: 1. Whether the proposed Planned Unit Development will be in conformity with the planning and other development goals and the policies of the United City of Yorkville. 2. Whether the existing zoning and land use in the general area of the Planned Unit Development is appropriate for a Planned Unit Development. B.Procedure:Prior to filing an application for approval of a Planned Unit Development,the petitioner shall be required to contact the city administrator or his designee to arrange an informal pre-application meeting with city staff and its consultants. 1. The pre-application conference is mandatory and shall be held with staff,but is at no charge to the petitioner.At such conference,the applicant shall provide information relating to the following: a. The location of the proposed Planned Unit Development; b. The land use types and approximate area of proposed land uses; c. A list of any and all exceptions to the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations requested; and d. Other information pertinent to the proposed Planned Unit Development. 2. The pre-application conference shall be an informal communication and discussion of the proposed Planned Unit Development, and no commitments shall be given,nor shall statements or opinions of the city staff and its consultants be deemed binding. 3. Staff shall review and provide input on the proposal's compatibility with the comprehensive plan and the goals and policies for planning of the city and advise the applicant on the information, documents,exhibits,and drawings on the proposal that should be included in the application to the city for a Planned Unit Development. (Ord.2006-40,5-23-2006) 10-13-6: CONCEPT PUD PLAN REVIEW: A. Purpose: The presentation of a Concept PUD Plan is optional.The purpose of the Concept PUD Plan is to enable the applicant to obtain the informal feedback from the city staff and City Council regarding the overall project concept, density and dwelling unit or land use type prior to spending considerable time and expense in the preparation of detailed preliminary PUD plans. 76 B. Procedure: Not less than forty-five (45) days before the next available City Council meeting, the applicant shall submit to the City for review the conceptual Planned Unit Development plan. The submittal shall consist of twenty (20) paper copies folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope and two (2) electronic copies of the following documentation: 1. A completed notarized application form,two(2)originals and the remainder photocopies. 2. The application shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3. An aerial photograph exhibit of the property taken within the last two (2) years. The aerial photograph exhibit shall be one-inch equals one-hundred(1"= 100) scale,but no less than one-inch equals four hundred(1"=400)and shall include the following: a.Title or Name of the proposed Planned Unit Development. b. Outline of property boundaries. c.Adjacent area within one-fourth(1/4)mile of property. 3. A zoning plat including a legal description of the property with total property acreage notated to be included in the Planned Unit Development. 4. A written explanation of the general character of the proposed Planned Unit Development that shall include the following: a. A description of all proposed land uses(including open space)with percentages of each use; b. Projected densities and housing type for each residential use; c. A description of the development standards and design criteria applicable to the proposed Planned Unit Development; d. An outline describing why the property should be developed as a Planned Unit Development; e. Identification of the conventional zoning classification allowing the uses for each land use type included and compatibility to the future land use designation for the property in the City's official Comprehensive Plan; f. Identification of existing uses and zoning of adjacent properties to the Planned Unit Development. g.A list of requested exceptions to applicable city ordinances and codes. 5. A written description of general site information that should include, but shall not be limited to, the following,if known or available: a. Existing site conditions. b. Environmental characteristics. c. Availability of community facilities and utilities. d. Existing covenants. 77 6. A conceptual Planned Unit Development sketch or land plan. The sketch or land plan shall provide sufficient detail to demonstrate the physical relationship between the existing land condition, surrounding land uses and the proposed Planned Unit Development,and shall include the following: a.North arrow(true meridian),scale and date of preparation. b.Name and address of the site planner,or engineer who prepared the plan. c.Name of property owner. d.Name of petitioner/developer. e.Proposed name of the Planned Unit Development. f. Location map showing the location of the Planned Unit Development within or proximity to the corporate boundaries. g. Boundary and/or property lines of proposed development and dimensions of the lots into which the property is proposed to be subdivided. h. Proposed land uses, and total acreage and percent of the site devoted to each land use including minimum and average lot sizes and proposed dedication of land for school and park sites, if applicable. C. City Council Review: The City Council shall conduct an informal review of the conceptual Planned Unit Development plan and supporting documentation and provide the applicant with general comments on the following: 1. Compatibility of the proposal with the transportation plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance and land use planning goals and objectives of the city. 2. Appropriateness of the proposed land uses. 3. General layout of open space,streets,parking areas,lots and buildings. 4. Other information the City Council would recommend be prepared for the preliminary Planned Unit Development plan phase. 10-13-7: PRELIMINARY PUD PLAT: A. Purpose: The purpose of the Preliminary PUD Plat submission is to obtain approval from the City that the plans the applicant intends to prepare and follow are acceptable as a Preliminary PUD Plat,and that any final plans will be approved provided they substantially conform to the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. Approval of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat shall not constitute authority to proceed with construction of any improvements but rather an approval of the general features of the plans as a basis for preparing the final plans. B. Procedure: Not less than forty five (45) days before the Plan Commission meeting, the applicant shall file an application with the Clerk's Office for Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat approval. The applicant shall submit twenty (20)paper copies folded to fit in a 10"x 13"envelope and two (2) electronic copies of the following documentation: 1.A completed notarized application form,two(2)originals and the remainder photocopies. 78 2. The application shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fees. 3. Disclosure of beneficiaries form and statement of present and proposed ownership of all land within the development. 4. An aerial photograph exhibit of the property taken within the last two (2) years of the adjacent area within one-fourth (1/4) mile of property. The aerial photograph exhibit shall be one-inch equals one-hundred(1"= 100)scale,but no less than one-inch equals four hundred(1"=400). 5. Written explanation of the character of the Planned Unit Development and the reasons why it has been planned to vary from the conventional Zoning Ordinance regulations.This explanation shall detail how the proposed Planned Unit Development meets the objectives of all official plans which affect the subject property. 6. Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. The plat shall be a detailed plan which includes at a minimum,the following information: a. Title notation stating"Preliminary Plat"or"Preliminary Plan". b. North arrow,scale(not less than 1 inch equals 100 feet)and date of preparation. c. Name and address of the site planner,engineer or surveyor who prepared the plan. d. Name of property owner. e. Name of petitioner/developer. f. Proposed name of the Planned Unit Development or subdivision name, which shall not duplicate the name of any plat previously recorded in Kendall County. g. Location map showing the general area of the Planned Unit Development within or proximity to the corporate boundaries. h. Legal description prepared by a registered land surveyor. i. Boundary lines—bearings and distances. j. Site data,including,as applicable: 1) Current zoning classification. 2) Total area of property in square feet and acreage, and percentage of each proposed land use. 3) Square footage and percent of site coverage with buildings. 4) Square footage and percent of site coverage with impervious surfaces. 79 5) Square footage and percent of site covered dedicated to common open space such as storm water management systems, landscaping and buffers, parks, trail corridors and recreational areas. 6) Total number of off-street parking and loading spaces provided and method used to calculate the number of required spaces for each land use. 7) Total number of buildings. 8) Total number of residential dwelling units by type, and the number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit type. 9) Gross Floor Area for all non-residential buildings/uses. 10) Gross and net densities for the overall Planned Unit Development and for each land use. a. Residential Density: Provide information on the density of residential uses, including dwelling units per acre, dwelling units per net acre; gross and net residential density (dwelling units per acre of land devoted to residential sectors of the PUD; gross being all land, net being gross acres minus land used for public or common usage). Information should also be provided for each unit in the Planned Unit Development,if applicable. b. Non-Residential Intensity: Provide information on the type and amount of non-residential uses including building locations, sizes, floor area ratio, building height,the amount and location of common open space. 11) Minimum,maximum and average lot sizes. 12) Percent of lot coverage for all uses except detached single-family and duplex. k. Depiction of Lots: a. Residential lots shall depict approximate lot dimensions;building footprints for all multi- family and single-family attached structures;and dimensioned required yard setbacks. b. Non-residential lots shall depict building footprints and dimensioned setbacks. Information regarding purpose/use and height of non-residential buildings shall also be provided. 1. Existing zoning and land use of adjacent property within five hundred feet (500') of all sides of the site. 80 m. Other conditions of adjoining land — owners of un-platted land; subdivision plat name, recording date and number of adjoining platted land; actual direction and gradient of ground slope, including any embankments or retaining walls; character and location of major buildings, railroads, power lines and towers. n. Municipal limits. o. School district boundaries. p. .Existing easements—location,width and purpose. q. Location of existing streets in, and adjacent to, the property including: street name, right-of-way width,existing and proposed center lines,pavement type,walks,trails,curbs,gutters,culverts,etc. r. Proposed public improvements such as highways and other major improvements planned by public authorities for future construction on or near the property. s. Existing utilities on, and adjacent to, the property including: location, size and invert elevation of sanitary and storm sewers; location and size of water mains; location of gas lines, fire hydrants, electric and telephone lines (above and below ground) and street lights; direction and distance to, and size of nearest water mains and sewers adjacent to the property showing invert elevations. t. Ground elevations on the property and on the first fifty feet (50') of all adjacent parcels showing a minimum of one foot(1')contours for land which slopes less than one-half percent('/2%)along with all breaks in grades, and all drainage channels or swales, and at selected points not more than one hundred feet (100') apart in all directions; for land that slopes more than one-half percent ('/2%) showing a minimum of two foot (2') contours. Any land within the one hundred (100) year floodplain,as determined by the City Engineer or an outside consultant,shall also be shown. u. Subsurface conditions on the property shall be shown,if deemed required by the City Engineer or an outside consultant. This includes the location and results of tests made to subsurface soil, rock and groundwater conditions,depth to groundwater,unless test pits are dry at a depth of fifteen feet(15'); location and results of a soil percolation test if individual sewage disposal systems are proposed. v. Water courses, marshes, rock outcrop, wooded areas, existing vegetation, isolated trees four inches (4")or more in diameter at breast height,existing structures and other significant features. w. Location of all proposed off-street parking and loading areas, including dimensions of parking spaces,drive aisles and loading zones. x. Configuration of all land proposed as open space including storm water management areas, parks, buffers,and trail corridors. 81 y. All sites to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for parks, school sites,public buildings, and similar public and quasi-public uses. z. Pedestrian and/or bicycle circulation systems. aa.Limits of jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetlands. bb.Any other data reasonably necessary to provide an accurate overview of the proposed development. 7. Preliminary landscape plan indicating the name, variety, size, location and quantities of plant material for all common and dedicated areas including parkways, buffer areas, storm water basins, wetlands, entry areas,medians, and parking lot islands. The landscape plan shall also depict permanent signs and street fixtures,and a detail plan of landscaping for a typical building area. 8. Preliminary engineering plan which shall be drawn on a print of the proposed land use plan. The proposed plan shall illustrate an appropriate location and dimensions of all sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and water lines for all proposed land uses, drainage ditches, culverts and storm water retention/detention areas,as well as all utility easements,and be accompanied with: a.A feasibility report or statement from the sanitary district attesting to the capability of the existing sewer system and wastewater treatment facility to service the proposed development. b.Preliminary stormwater report. c.Preliminary mass grading plan. d.Traffic analysis or study, prepared by a transportation engineer or planner, which analyzes the impact caused by the Planned Unit Development on the street and highway systems. 9. Architectural drawings. Preliminary architectural drawings for all primary buildings and accessory buildings shall be submitted which include: a. Typical elevations(front,rear and side)for proposed residential and nonresidential buildings,which identify materials and color styling proposed for all elements of the building. b.Proposed building heights. c. Roof plan for all nonresidential structures, which shows the proposed location of all roof mounted mechanical equipment. 10.Development Plan Schedule indicating: a. Stages in which the project will be built, with emphasis on area, density, use of public facilities, and open space to be developed with each stage. 82 b. Each stage as a separate unit. The unit shall be described and mapped on the project. Overall design of each unit shall be shown on the plan and through supporting graphic materials. c. Dates for beginning and completion of each stage. 11. The Plan Commission or City Council may require preparation and submittal, at the petitioner's expense, of the following for review and evaluation: a.Fiscal impact study,detailing the estimated cost which the Planned Unit Development will have on all taxing bodies, and anticipated revenues to such taxing bodies which will be realized from each phase of development.Information shall include detailed estimates on: 1) Expected population of the development; 2) Impact on service and/or operating costs to be incurred by each taxing body as a result of the development; 3) Any major capital investments required, in part or in whole, by each taxing body due to the development; b.Proposed covenants,conditions and restrictions and/or homeowner association bylaws. c. Environmental analysis or study, prepared by an environmental specialist, which analyzes the major impacts the Planned Unit Development may have on the environment including, but not limited to,the effects on discrete ecosystems,deteriorated air quality in the immediate vicinity and along arterial and collector roadways leading to the Planned Unit Development from a specified distance determined by the City Engineer or consultant; any deterioration in the groundwater or surface water quality; effect on sensitive land areas such as floodplains,wetlands, forests, aquifer recharge areas,historic buildings or structures,prairie landscapes,and mineral resource reserves. d. Market study indicating the extent of market demand for the uses proposed in the Planned Unit Development including an analysis of demographics, sales potentials, competitive alignment, an assessment of the market share or opportunity gaps, and marketing positioning of each component of the Planned Unit Development. C. Plan Council Review: Upon receipt of all the required submittals, the clerk's office shall distribute copies of the application and supporting documentation to members of the Plan Council. The Plan Council shall review the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation and make a recommendation to the Plan Commission as to the proposal's compatibility with the city's planning objectives, transportation plan,recreation master plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision control ordinance,annexation agreement,and other goals and policies for developing the city. D. Plan Commission Review: The Plan Commission shall conduct a public hearing in accordance with Illinois Compiled Statutes. After the close of the public hearing, the Plan Commission shall recommend to the City Council approval or denial of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. The recommendation may include conditions of approval intended to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. 1. When applicable for the Park Board to review the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation, the Park Board shall have a representative present at the Plan Commission public hearing meeting for input and recommendation to the City 83 Council. The recommendations may include conditions of approval intended to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. 2. As part of the Park Board representative's review of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation, consideration shall be given to the following standards: a. Compatibility of the proposal with the recreation master plan and park development standards. b. Layout and organization of the open space system. c. Compliance with the city's land-cash ordinance for parks. E. City Council Review: Subsequent to receiving the Plan Commission and Park Board recommendations, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing and shall approve or deny the application for the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. 10-13-8: FINAL PUD PLAT: A. Purpose: A Final Plat for the Planned Unit Development, suitable for recording with the Kendall County Recorder of Deeds, shall be prepared by the petitioner for consideration and approval by the city. The purpose of the Final PUD Plat submission is to designate and depict with particularity the land subdivided into lots,whether conventional or otherwise, common open space and building areas. The Final Plat shall also designate and limit the specific internal uses of buildings, structures, and uses of land, as well as provide any additional information or details required by the City Council when approving the Final PUD Plat. B. Procedure: Not less than forty five (45) days before the Plan Commission meeting,the applicant shall file an application with the Clerk's Office for Final Planned Unit Development Plat approval. The applicant shall submit twenty (20) paper copies folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope and two (2) electronic copies of the following documentation: 1. A completed notarized application form,two(2)originals and the remainder photocopies. 2. The application shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fees. 3. Final Planned Unit Development Plat. The plat shall be a detailed plan which includes, at a minimum,the following information: a) An accurate legal description of the entire area under the immediate development within the Planned Unit Development. b) A subdivision plat of all subdivided lands in the same form and meeting all the requirements of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance and Municipal Code. c) An accurate legal description of each separate unsubdivided use area, including common open space. d) Designation of exact location of all buildings to be constructed, and a designation of the specific internal uses to which each building shall be put,including construction details. 84 e) Illustrate center line elevations, pavement type, curbs, gutters, culverts, etc., and a proposed street numbering designation shall also be furnished for each building. f) Construction plans detailing the design, construction or installation of site amenities; including buildings, landscaping, storm water detention facilities and other site improvements. g) Certificates, seals, and signatures required for the dedication of land and recording of the document. h) Tabulations on each separate unsubdivided use area, including land area, number of buildings,and number of dwelling units per acre. i) Construction schedule—A final construction schedule indicating: i. Stages in which the project will be built, with emphasis on area, density, use of public facilities,and open space to be developed with each stage. ii. Each stage as a separate unit. The unit shall be described and mapped on the project. Overall design of each unit shall be shown on the plan and through supporting graphic materials. iii. Dates for beginning and completion of each stage. 4. Common Open Space Documents: All common open space, at the discretion of the City Council, shall be: a) Conveyed to a city or public corporation, or conveyed to a not-for-profit corporation or entity established for the purpose of benefitting the owners and residents of the Planned Unit Development or adjoining property owners of any one or more of them. All lands conveyed hereunder shall be subject to the right of the grantee or grantees to enforce maintenance and improvement of the common open space;or b) Guaranteed by a restrictive covenant describing the open space and its maintenance and improvement, running with the land for the benefit of residents of the Planned Unit Development or adjoining property owners and/or both. c) Such documents shall also provide that the city shall have the right, but not the obligation, to perform necessary maintenance of the common open space, and shall have the authority to place a lien against the individually-owned property in the Planned Unit Development for the costs thereof. 5. Public and Quasi-Public Facilities — Guarantee of Performance: All public and quasi-public facilities and improvements made necessary as a result of the Planned Unit Development, including but not limited to,parks, schools,recreational areas, etc., shall guarantee the completion of such, as set forth in the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance, except where varied by the approved Final Plat. 6. Final covenants,conditions and restrictions and/or homeowner association bylaws. 7. Delinquent Taxes — A certificate shall be furnished from the County Tax Collector that no delinquent taxes exist and that all special assessments constituting a lien on the whole,or any part, of the property of the Planned Unit Development have been paid. 85 10-13-9: AMENDMENTS OR MINOR REVISIONS TO PUD: After the approval of the Final Planned Unit Development Plat, the use of land, construction, location of buildings and structures in the Planned Unit Development shall be developed in accordance with such approved plans,rather than by any other provisions of the zoning ordinance. Any changes,modifications or alterations to the approved Final Planned Unit Development Plat shall be considered either a minor or a major modification. 1. No changes may be made to the approved Final Planned Unit Development Plat unless approved by the city. The nature of the requested change, either minor or major, to the Planned Unit Development will be determined by the City Administrator,or designee,as follows: A. Minor Changes: Minor changes to the Final PUD Plat are modifications or revisions that do not alter the overall intent of the PUD. Minor changes may be approved by the City Administrator, or designee if the proposed modification does not result in any of the following: i. An increase or decrease in overall density greater than five percent(5%). ii. An increase or decrease in the mixture of residential dwelling unit types greater than five percent(5%). iii. An increase or decrease in area for any land use or land use mixture greater than five percent(5%). iv. An increase or decrease in total number of parking spaces greater than five percent (5%). v. Any reduction in area of common open space, landscaping or buffering, particularly when reduced below the minimum standard prescribed in Section 10-13-11: Development Standards and Design Criteria. vi. Any significant changes in building layout,orientation or height of buildings. vii. A change in the functional classification of a roadway. Minor changes not approved by the City Administrator may be appealed by the applicant or property owner to the City Council without review and recommendation by the Plan Commission with input from the Park Board representative (if applicable), unless the City Council refers the request for a minor change to the Plan Commission for review and recommendation. B. Major Changes: Major changes to the Final PUD Plat are modifications which alter the concept or intent of the approved PUD exceeding the criteria set forth constituting a minor change. Major changes to the Final PUD Plat shall be subject to review and recommendation by the Plan Commission with input from the Park Board representative (when applicable) with final approval or denial determined by the City Council. C. Application for PUD Modification or Changes: For any modifications or changes resulting in an amendment to an approved Final PUD Plat, the applicant shall submit a revised plat and supporting data with an application for a major or minor change to the Clerk's Office in accordance with the following: i. The title of the plat shall indicate the nature of the change. ii. If a major change, the revised plat and supporting data with an application shall be submitted to the Clerk's Office not less than forty five (45) days before the Plan Commission meeting. 86 D. Notice for Major Changes to PUD Plat: The notice for a major change to an approved Final PUD Plat shall conform to the requirements of Section 10-4-10:Amendments of this Title. E. All approved major or minor changes to an approved Final PUD Plat shall be recorded with the County and shall be binding on the applicants, their successors, grantees and assigns and shall govern the development of the PUD,as set forth therein. 10-13-10: CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: The Plan Commission may recommend approval of a Special Use for Planned Unit Development or amendments to the Preliminary or Final Planned Unit Development Plat for the proposed development or amendment upon considering the following: 1. In what respect does the design of the Planned Unit Development meet the requirements and design standards of the development standards and design criteria, 2. The extent to which the proposed plan deviates and/or requires waivers of the bulk regulations in the zoning ordinance and how the modifications in design standards from the subdivision control regulations fulfill the intent of those regulations. 3. The extent of public benefit produced by the Planned Unit Development, such as but not limited to, the adequacy of common open space and/or public recreational facilities provided; sufficient control over vehicular traffic; provision of public services; provision and protection of the reasonable enjoyment of the land. 4. The relationship and compatibility,beneficial or adverse, of the Planned Unit Development to the adjacent properties and nearby land uses. 5. The extent to which the Planned Unit Development fulfills the objectives of the future planning objectives or other planning policies of the City. 6. The Plan Commission finds that the Planned Unit Development satisfactorily meets the standards for Special Use as defined in Section 10-4-9 of this Title. 10-13-11: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN CRITERIA: A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to establish and provide a comprehensive set of standards and guidelines in which Planned Unit Developments are designed. While specific recommendations for development and design are provided, flexibility is also encouraged through guidelines which enable individual developments to be distinct from one another while maintaining the inherent character of the city. B. Applicability: These standards and established criteria shall apply to all newly constructed buildings and sites within a Planned Unit Development. Each proposed development will be evaluated on its compliance with the established regulations/guidelines contained herein. C. Density: The density,minimum lot size and minimum setback dimension for each use proposed within a PUD shall be determined by the conventional zoning classification which would permit the proposed use unless a variance is specifically requested as part of the Special Use request. D. Use Regulations: Planned Unit Developments may be comprised of a single-type of land use or a mixture of land uses when applicable and when different intensity of land uses are appropriately buffered or separated. 87 1. Uses proposed shall be consistent with those listed as allowable uses in the respective zoning districts. 2. Uses listed as special uses in the zoning district in which the development is located may be allowed. E. The Plan Commission may recommend and the City Council may approve access to a dwelling by a driveway or pedestrian walk easement. Off street parking facilities for such dwelling shall be located not more than two hundred feet(200')from the dwelling served. F. The Plan Commission also may recommend and the City Council may approve yards of lesser widths or depths than required for permitted uses in the zoning classification which the planned development is including,provided: a. Those protective covenants are recorded with perpetual access easements and off street parking spaces for use by the residents of the dwellings served. b. That spacing between buildings shall be consistent with the application of recognized site planning principles for securing a unified development and that due consideration is given to the openness normally afforded by intervening streets and alleys. c. The yards for principal buildings along the periphery of the development shall be not less in width or depth than required for permitted uses in the district in which the planned unit development is included and the plan is developed to afford adequate protection to neighboring properties, i.e. fire protection and sufficient area needed for utility easements, as recommended by the Plan Commission and approved by the City Council. G. Design Criteria: All standards of the United City of Yorkville Design Guidelines (Ord. 2009-28) and the Section 7.00 Design Standards of the United City of Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance's shall apply to all Planned Unit Developments. 10-13-12: FEES: The City Council shall establish a schedule of fees, charges and expenses for occupancy permits, appeals, applications and amendments for special use, and other matters pertaining to this chapter. The schedule of fees shall be filed in the clerk's office and may be altered or amended only by the City Council. Until all applicable fees, charges and expenses have been paid in full,no action shall be taken on any application or appeal. (Ord.2006-40,5-23-2006) 10-13-13: SEVERABILITY: Each section,clause and provision of this chapter shall be considered as separable,and the invalidity of one or more shall not have any effect upon the validity of other sections, clauses or provisions on this chapter. (Ord.2006-40,5-23-2006) 10-13-14: EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: A. The planned unit development shall be constructed in a timely manner. The planned unit development shall be subject to revocation under the following conditions: 88 1. Final Plat approval does not occur within twelve(12)months from the date of approval of the preliminary plat of a planned unit development. 2. Construction does not commence and proceed within three(3)years from the date of approval of the Final Plat of a Planned Unit Development. 3. The City Council may extend the time limits for Final Plat approval for no more than two(2) 12- month periods.Commencement for construction may also be extended by the City Council in one (1)year increments. B. The City Council may initiate or the owner of the parcel of land on which the Planned Unit Development is to be constructed may apply for the revocation of the Planned Unit Development. The owner shall be notified, in writing, at least thirty(30)days prior to the City Council's consideration of the revocation if initiated by the City Council. C. The City Council shall consider, but not be limited to, the following standards in the review of the status of the project construction to determine whether there is reasonable cause for delay: a. The original program of development with regard to market demand for the components included in the final plan; b. Conditions in the real estate finance market; c. General economic conditions in the local area,state or region; d. The ability and purposefulness of development operations for the Planned Unit Development; and e. Laws, ordinances or other regulations that may have affected timely development of the project. D. Upon consideration of the findings by the City Council regarding the standards in Subsection 10-13- 14C,the City Council shall decide whether: a. To revoke those portions of the Planned Unit Development for which construction has not begun; b. To extend the time allotted for construction to commence based upon a revised schedule of construction,or c. To require special changes in the Planned Unit Development as a condition of a time extension, whereby such changes shall be deemed a"major change"to the Planned Unit Development. E. Upon revocation of a Planned Unit Development, the parcel of land shall conform to the permitted uses and other regulations of the underlying zoning district of which it is a Special Use unless an amendment or other Special Use is initiated by the City Council or is applied for by the owner of the parcel of land on which the Planned Unit Development was to be constructed and granted by the City Council. 89 10-13-15: EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effective immediately after passage, approval and publication in book form according to law,and its regulations shall be in effect except where a Final Plat for Planned Unit Development has been approved and building permit issued prior to the enactment of this ordinance, and further providing that substantial change of position, expenditures or incurrence of obligations by or on behalf of the applicant of such approval or building permit would occur as a result of compliance with the ordinance. Applications for Concept PUD Plan Review, or amendments to approved Preliminary PUD Plat or Final PUD Plat under the former Planned Unit Development (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) shall automatically become null and void by the enactment of this ordinance, unless acted upon prior to the enactment of this ordinance. 90 0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ NB #7 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Tracking Number W City Administrator ■ °°°�°ov$edt `O Consultant ❑ County ❑ EDC 2011-16 Kentlall <4L.E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Foreclosure Update for March and April 2011 Meeting and Date: EDC—June 7, 2011 Synopsis: Report of ongoing activities related to foreclosures in Yorkville for 2010. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: n/a Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: None Council Action Requested: No action/Informational Item Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memo. Memorandum ESL X836 „0. -� To: Economic Development Committee O From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director °Ac. � CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator CLE '►�"� Date: April 26, 2011 Subject: Foreclosure Update—March & April 2011 Attached are the monthly foreclosure reports for March and April 2011 provided by the Yorkville Economic Development Corporation (YEDC) for the cities of Yorkville, Plano, Oswego and Montgomery in Kendall County, Illinois. The reports list the number of foreclosures during various stages in the process including pre-foreclosure, bank-owned and auctioned properties for the City of Yorkville since the beginning of the calendar year (refer to highlighted columns in the table below). The number of auctioned and pre-foreclosure properties fell slightly in March and April since the beginning of the calendar year. However, the most notable decline was observed in the number of bank-owned properties in Yorkville during these past few months, with an average decrease of nearly 3% since January. Based upon these figures, it appears the housing market is showing signs of stabilization as the number of foreclosed properties level off, with an overall decline of about 8% during the 1"quarter of 2011. Table 1.Yorkville,IL Foreclosures Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Auction 48 48 38 38 Bank-Owned 414 400 384 383 Pre-Foreclosures 296 292 280 282 TOTAL 758 740 702 703 Data Source:Yorkville Economic Development Corporation 450 400 350 300 250 ❑Auction 200 ❑Bank-Owned 150 ❑Pre-Foreclosure 100 50 0 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Kendall County, IL Foreclosures April 18, 2011 1 Auction I Bank Owned I Pre-foreclosures Yorkville (60560) 38 384 280 Plano (60545) 25 133 227 Oswego (60543) 45 177 336 Montgomery (60538) 64 145 351 Kendall County, IL Foreclosures April 26, 2011 Auction I Bank Owned I Pre-foreclosures Yorkville (60560) 38 383 282 Plano (60545) 23 136 231 Oswego (60543) 44 176 347 Montgomery (60538) 61 146 355 c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ NB #8 II Finance ❑ EST. , � 1836 Engineer ❑ Agenda Item Tracking Number y City Administrator ■ Consultant ❑ EDC 2011-20 dal County El`E City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Building Code Update Committee Proposed Recommendations Meeting and Date: EDC—June 7, 2011 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: N/A Item Number: N/A Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval of recommendations Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memorandum. Memorandum 0-0 To: Economic Development Committee EST. ! W� 1836 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director 1 �- --� Paul Zabel, Chief Building Code Official 49 CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: May 27, 2011 <LE � Subject: Building Code Update Committee Proposed Recommendations Background: In July 2010, the United City of Yorkville's Building Code Update Committee (BCUC)convened and began the arduous process of thoroughly reviewing and analyzing our current building code ordinance. Over the course of nine months, the BCUC evaluated and recommended amendments to the 2009 International Code Council (ICC) series of nationally recognized building codes which include provisions for new and existing buildings, residential structures, fire prevention, mechanical, fuel gas and property maintenance; along with the Illinois State Plumbing, Illinois Energy Conservation and the National Fire Protection Association Electrical codes. The 2009 edition of the International Codes (I- Codes) published by the ICC are fully compatible and are strongly encouraged to be used collectively to ensure consistency in the application of the provisions. Until now, the City enforced the construction standards under the 2000 International Code Council (ICC) series which were adopted by Yorkville in 2003 (Ord. 2003-01). Since that time, however, there have been three (3) cycles of updates to the code series occurring in the years 2003, 2006 and most recently in 2009. The Building Code Update Committee's review and subsequent recommendation for approval with amendments to the 2009 ICC series has reaffirmed that these codes and standards are a comprehensive, coordinated and necessary tool in regulating the built environment within our city. In addition to protecting our residents' safety and ensuring that the most effective construction methods are utilized during construction,by adopting the most up-to-date code editions allows the city to achieve high ratings with the Insurance Service Office (ISO). These high ratings can translate into discounted insurance premiums for new residential and commercial construction in Yorkville. Below is a summary of each of the ten (10) codes that were reviewed and recommended for adoption with amendments by the Building Code Update Committee. Related supplemental materials, including significant changes to the codes from previous editions, considered by the BCUC during their deliberation have also been attached for your reference. I. INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE®(2009) Summar y The International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) generally pertains to the design and installation of natural gas piping systems, equipment that utilize fuel gas, gaseous hydrogen systems and related compressed gas equipment such as appliances. Other provisions in this code relate to approved materials, components, fabrication, testing, inspection, operation and maintenance of fuel gas systems,with specific criteria given for such appliances as chimney, furnaces, boilers, water heaters, room heaters and clothes dryers. This code also references the 2009 International Mechanical Code, 2009 International Building Code and 2009 International Fire Code. BCUC Recommendations) The Building Code Update Committee recommended adopting the IFGC 2009 with the following amendments: 1 1. Section 403.5 Metallic Tubing shall be deleted, with the exception of subsection 403.5.4 Corrugated Stainless Steel Tubing(CSST). 2. The following Subsection shall be added to Section 502.6: 502.6 B Vent support: B vent support shall be provided every 5 feet minimum with no screw penetrations unless specifically permitted by the vent manufacturer. StaffComments With regards to Section 403.5 Metallic Tubing,the Building Code Update Committee is proposing that all hard metal such as copper, brass, aluminum, cast iron and steel not be used for fuel gas piping and only permit corrugated stainless steel tubing(CSST)to be used. While staff supports the use of CSST for small appliance connections (stoves, laundry dryers, etc.), it is not an appropriate material for all fuel gas appliances (e.g.,hot water heaters). StaffRecommendation(s) Staff recommends approval of the 2009 International Fuel Gas Code as amended by the Building Code Update Committee subject to not deleting Section 403.5 as recommended by the BCUC. II. INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE®(2009) Summary The purpose of the International Plumbing Code (IPC) is to establish minimum acceptable safety standards when supplying potable water to plumbing fixtures and outlets and the passage of potentially contaminated waste water from fixtures. The IPC accomplishes this by regulating the design and installation of plumbing systems such as water heater installation, water distribution systems, sanitary drainage, special wastes, venting, and storm drainage. Plumbing fixture requirements for all building types are also regulated under the IPC except for detached one-and two-family dwellings and townhouses that are no more than three stores above grade in height which is covered in the International Residential Code(IRC). BCUC Recommendations) The Building Code Update Committee recommended adopting the IPC 2009 with the following amendments: 1. Subsection 305.6.1 Frost protection depths shall be changed to read as follows: 305.6.1.1 Water service piping shall be installed below the recorded frost penetration but not less than five and one-half (5.5) feet below grade. In climates with freezing temperatures, plumbing piping in exterior building walls or areas subject to freezing temperatures shall be protected against freezing by insulation or heat or both. Water service piping shall be installed not less than five and one-half(5.5) feet below grade to top of pipe. 305.6.1.2 Sewer depth: Building sewers that connect to public or private sewage disposal systems shall be a minimum of forty-two (42) inches below finished grade. Measurement shall be taken from top of pipe. 2. Table 403.1 shall be deleted and replaced as follows: 2 Minimum Number of Plumbing Fixtures shall be as prescribed in Section 890 Appendix A of the current Illinois Plumbing Code. 3. Section 403.2 shall be deleted in its entirety. Separate facilities. Where plumbing fixtures are required, separate facilities shall be provided for each sex. Exceptions: 1. Separate facilities shall not be required for dwelling units and sleeping units. 2. Separate facilities shall not be required in structures or tenant spaces with a total occupant load, including both employees and customers, of 15 or less. 3. Separate facilities shall not be required in mercantile occupancies in which the maximum occupant load is SO or less. 4. Subsection 603.1 shall be changed to read as follows: Size of water service pipe: The water service pipe shall be sized to supply water to the structure in the quantities and at the pressure required in this code. For any new water service, the minimum diameter of water service pipe shall be one and one-quarter (P/4) inches or in accordance with Title 7, Chapter 5: Water Use and Service of the City Code. 5. Section 603.2 shall be amended as follows: Separation of water service and building sewer: Water service pipe and the building shall be separated by 10 feet of undisturbed or compacted earth. 603.2 Exceptions shall be deleted in their entirety. 6. Subsection 603.2.1 shall be changed to read as follows: Water service near sources of pollution: Potable water service pipes shall not be located in, under, or above cesspools, septic tanks, septic tank drainage fields, seepage pits, or gasoline storage tanks. Refer to requirements of Section 605.1 regarding soil and groundwater conditions. Where the water service pipe must cross the sewer, the bottom of the water service,within ten(10) feet of the point of crossing, shall be at least eighteen (18) inches above the top of the sewer. Water service pipe shall be at least ten (10) feet away from all gasoline storage tanks or piping. 7. The following tables shall be deleted in their entirety and shall be replaced with "All Approved Standards and Materials for water service pipe shall be as prescribed in Section 890 Appendix A of the current Illinois Plumbing Code": Table 605.3 Water Service Pipe Table 605.4 Water Distribution Pipe Table 605.5 Pipe Fittings Table 702.1 Above-ground Drainage and Vent Pipe Table 702.2 Underground Building Drainage and Vent Pipe Table 702.3 Building Sewer Pipe Table 702.4 Pipe Fittings Table 1102.4 Building Storm Sewer Pipe Table 1102.5 Subsoil Drain Pipe Table 1102.7 Pipe Fittings 8. The following subsection shall be added to Section 1113: 3 1113.1.5 Required sump pit discharge piping: All sump pump discharges shall be handled in conformance with one of the following: 1) Discharge to the public storm sewer may occur at any time in conformance with the United City of Yorkville's Standard Specifications for Improvements. 2) Discharge to grade, when not prohibited above, may be permitted provided that the sump pumps do not discharge directly onto any street, sidewalk, bike path, or in any manner that will cause icing, flooding or a nuisance. 1113.2 Sump pit required: Crawl spaces under buildings used for human habitation shall be provided with a sump pit in accordance with Section 1113. When both a basement and crawl space are provided under a building used for human habitation, only the basement must be provided with a sump pit. When a basement exists without a sump pit and a crawl space is being constructed immediately adjacent thereto, the crawl space shall not require a sump pit. 9. The following language shall be added under General Provisions regarding the adoption of both the 2009 International Plumbing Code and current Illinois Plumbing Code: Where a conflict between the 2009 International Plumbing Code and current Illinois Plumbing Code exist,the more restrictive regulation shall apply. Staff Comments With regards to the proposed amendment to Subsection 603.1 Size of water service pipe to require a one and one-quarter (P/4) inch pipe, the city currently requires only a one-inch service line for water service pipe. Although staff is generally supportive of the increase in water service pipe line to accommodate any future water suppressant (fire sprinkler) systems for residential properties, the city's Public Works department would need to purchase additional equipment to accommodate the new water service line as the P/4 pipe is not a standard size. Therefore, staff would prefer to increase the water service pipe to one and one-half(1'/2)inch. Staf fRecommenda tion(s) Staff recommends approval of the 2009 International Plumbing Code as amended by the Building Code Update Committee subject to revising Subsection 603.1 to require the size of water service pipe for any new water service to be one and one-half(11/2)inches in diameter. III. ILLINOIS ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE (2009) Summary The IECC is designed to help protect the environment and reduce energy consumption. The goals of this statewide policy is to cut pollution, moderate peak energy demand, better assure the reliability of energy supplies and stabilize energy costs. In 2009 the Energy Efficient Commercial Building Act was amended to include residential buildings and is now referred to as the Energy Efficient Building Act. The new requirements for residential buildings became effective on January 29, 2010. Under the new law, design and construction professionals to follow the latest published edition of the International Energy Conservation Code which is currently the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code and the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 90.1. Although local governments may adopt stricter energy conservation Laws for commercial buildings, local governments may not adopt or regulate energy conservation standards either less or more stringent than the Illinois Energy Conservation Code for residential buildings. 4 BCUC Recommendations) The Building Code Update Committee recommended adopting the Illinois Energy Conservation Code (2009)without amendments. Staff Comments Per Illinois law, adoption of the 2009 Energy Conservation Code is mandatory statewide and must be adopted in order for the City of Yorkville to be in compliance. Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approval of the 2009 Illinois Energy Conservation Code. IV. INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE®(2009) Summary The International Mechanical Code (IMC) is modeled to regulate the design and installation of mechanical systems such as appliances, appliance venting, duct and ventilation systems, combustion air, hydronic systems (hot-water heaters/radiators) and solar systems. The standards imposed by the IMC also protect those that install,maintain, service and replace these mechanical systems and appliances. BCUC Recommendations) The Building Code Update Committee recommended adopting the IMC 2009 with the following amendments: 1. The following subsection shall be added to Section 901: 901.5 Any penetration of the firebox area made by a gas pipe shall be sealed by mortar caulk or other method approved by the Building Code Official. 2. Appendix A. Combustion Air Openings and Chimney Connector Pass-Throughs shall be adopted. Staff Comments None. Staff Recommenda tion U) Staff recommends approval of the 2009 International Mechanical Code as amended by the Building Code Update Committee. V. INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE"'(2009) Summary The International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) regulates the minimum maintenance requirements for existing buildings and is used by the city's Building Code Officials when enforcing exterior and interior upkeep of residential and commercial structures. The provisions of the IMPC also establishes maintenance standards for basic equipment, light,ventilation,heating, sanitation and fire safety. 5 BCUC Recommendations) The Building Code Update Committee recommended adopting the IPMC 2009 with the following amendments: 1. The following subsections shall be added to Section 302.2 Grading and Drainage: 302.2.1 Individual Earthen Stockpiles. Stockpiles of earthen materials in excess of two (2) feet above grade located on a single vacant lot that causes a nuisance, with the exception of City approved landscaped berms, shall be flattened and maintained per City Ordinance. 302.2.2 Developer Community Earthen Stockpiles. Upon substantial completion of mass grading, stockpiles of earthen material in excess of ten(10) feet above grade located on a vacant lot will require a six(6)foot temporary galvanized chain link fence. 2. Section 302.4 Weeds shall be amended to include the language as follows: Exception: City approved native prairie planting areas are exempt from the maximum height requirement. 3. Section 602.2 Residential Occupancies shall be amended to delete the Exception. Residential occupancies. Dwellings shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 68DF (20°C) in all habitable rooms, bathrooms and toilet rooms based on the winter outdoor design temperature for the locality indicated in Appendix D of the International Plumbing Code. Cooking appliances shall not be used to provide space heating to meet the requirements of this section. Exception:In areas where the average monthly temperature is above 30°F(-I DC), a minimum temperature of 65°F(18°C)shall be maintained. StaffComments In the discussion of the property maintenance standards, the BCUC has taken into consideration in Section 302.2 Grading and Drainage and Section 302.4 Weeds, issues aesthetic regarding stalled residential developments which may have stockpiles of black dirt on developer owned lots. Consideration has also been given to the recently approved native prairie planting mix permitted to exceed the maximum eight(8) inch weed nuisance ordinance requirement. With regard to the BCUC proposed exception to Section 602.2 Residential Occupancies, staff would note that this section as originally written requires all habitable rooms in dwellings to maintain a minimum room temperature of 68 degrees Fahrenheit with the exception to allow for a minimum temperature of only 65 degrees Fahrenheit in areas where the average monthly temperature is above 30 degrees Fahrenheit. StaffRecommenda tion(s) Staff recommends approval of the 2009 International Property Maintenance Code as amended by the Building Code Update Committee. VI. INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE®(2009) Summary The International Fire Code (IFC) is modeled to regulate fire safety requirements for new and existing buildings, facilities, storage and processes. The IFC addresses fire prevention, fire protection, life safety 6 and safe storage and use of hazardous materials and provides a holistic approach of controlling hazards in all building types and structures, regardless if indoors or outdoors. The minimum standards set forth in the IFC are aimed at protecting building occupants, emergency responders, and limiting the damage to a building and its contents as a result of fire, explosion or unauthorized use and/or discharge of hazardous materials. BCUC Recommendations) The Building Code Update Committee recommended adopting the IFC 2009 with the following amendments: 1. Section 101.1 Title. Shall be amended to insert the name of jurisdiction — United City of Yorkville 2. Section 103.1 General. Shall be amended to read as follows: In accordance with the provisions set forth in the inter-governmental agreement with the Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District, the department of fire prevention is established within the jurisdiction under the direction of the fire code official. The function of the department shall be the implementation, administration and enforcement of the provisions of this code. 3. Section 103.2 Appointment. Shall be amended to read as follows: The Fire Marshal of the Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District shall be the Fire Code Official as appointed by the Fire Chief. The Fire Chief shall appoint personnel of the Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District to assist in enforcing this code. Such appointments shall include, but not be limited to a Fire Marshal, and as many inspectors, investigators, and public safety educators as may be needed. For the purposes of this code,the Fire Marshal is the same as the fire code official. 4. Section 104.8 Modifications. Shall be amended to include the following: A signed copy of the Fire Chief s decision shall be kept in the permit file and furnished to the permit applicant. 5. Section 105.1.1 Permits Required. Shall be amended to read as follows: Permits required by this code shall be obtained from the fire code official. Permit and plan review fees, if any, shall be paid in accordance with the approved inter- governmental agreement prior to issuance of the permit. Permits shall be kept on the premises designated therein at all times and shall be readily available for inspection by the fire code official. 6. Section 105.4.1 Submittals. Shall be amended to read as follows: Construction documents and supporting data shall be sealed with a"NICET III" or higher certification and submitted for review and approval by the Fire Code Official. A minimum of two sets of plans and specifications shall be included in the submittal along with two copies of an approved electronic file. Upon approval by the fire code official, one set of approved plans and specifications shall be provided to the United City of Yorkville community development department. 7. Section 105.6 Required operational permits. Shall be amended to read as follows: The Fire Code Official is authorized to issue operational permits for the operations set forth in sections 105.6.1 through 105.6.46. Any fees associated with the issuance of an operational permit shall be paid in accordance with the approved fee schedule in the inter-governmental agreement with the Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District. All operational permits shall be kept on file with the Fire Code Official. 7 8. Section 105.6.2 Amusement buildings. Shall be deleted in its entirety. Amusement buildings. An operational permit it is required to operate a special amusement building. 9. Section 105.6.11 Cutting and welding. Shall be deleted in its entirety. Cutting and welding. An operational permit is required to conduct cutting or welding operations within the Jurisdiction. 10. Section 105.6.30 Open burning. Shall be amended to read as follows: All open burning shall comply with Ordinance No. 2010-28 of the City's Code of Ordinances providing for the regulation of open burning, as amended from time to time. 11. Section 105.6.32 Open flames and candles. Shall be deleted in its entirety. Open flames and candles. An operational permit is required to use open flames or candles in connection with assembly areas, dining areas of restaurants or drinking establishments. 12. Section 105.6.34 Places of assembly. Shall be deleted in its entirety. Places of assembly. An operational permit is required to operate a place of assembly. 13. Section 105.6.47 Laboratory/research facility. Shall be added as follows: An operational permit is required to operate any laboratory or research facility which conducts testing or experimentation. 14. Section 105.6.48 Child Care(home occupation). Shall be added as follows: An operational permit is required to operate a child care facility as a "home occupation" for 6 or more children that are cared for at any one time. The operational permit shall not include provisions for permanent residence or overnight accommodations. All local and state laws shall be adhered to in conjunction with the registration and licensing requirements of the Department of Children and Family Services(DCFS). 15. Section 109.3 Violations. Shall be amended to read as follows: Persons who violate a provision of this code or fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof or who erects, installs, alters, repairs, or performs work in violation of the approved construction documents or directive of the Fire Code Official, or of a permit or certificate used under provisions of this code, shall be subject to a penalty according to the local, state, and federal laws. The maximum fine for such penalty shall not exceed seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750)per offense, unless stated otherwise in accordance with state or federal laws. Criminal proceedings may be heard in the applicable judicial circuit court as prescribed by state or federal law. Each day that a violation continues after due notice has been served shall be deemed a separate offense. 16. Section 109.3.2 False Alarm. Shall be added as follows: An alarm signal given needlessly, which indicates the existence of any emergency situation; when in fact, no such emergency exists, shall constitute a false alarm and shall be subject to penalty as prescribed in the schedule of fees set forth in the inter- governmental agreement. A false alarm shall include any alarm signal generated by any fire protection system by whatever means,but shall not include alarms resulting from any of the following causes: 1. A fire causing structural damage to the protected premises - verified by the fire district. 8 2. A tornado or hurricane winds causing structural damage to the protected premises — verified by the fire district. 3. Flooding to the protected premises due to overflow of natural drainage —verified by the fire district. 4. Telephone line malfunction verified to the fire district by an authorized telephone company supervisor within seven days of the occurrence. 5. Electrical service interruption verified to the fire district by the local power company within seven days of the occurrence. 6. Plumbing or electrical malfunctions unrelated to the fire protection system—verified by the fire district. 17. Section 109.3.3 False Alarm, schedule of fees. Shall be added as follows: Fees assessed for the improper use of a fire alarm system shall be subject to the schedule of fees in accordance with the inter-governmental agreement with the Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District. These fees shall be collected by the Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District and reported to the United City of Yorkville. As new fees are created or old fees are changed, the schedule of fees associated with the inter-governmental agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the United City of Yorkville. 18. Section 111.4 Failure to comply. Shall be amended to read as follows: Any person who continues to work after having been served with a "stop work order," except such work as that person is directed to perform to remove a violation or unsafe condition, shall be subject to a general code penalty as prescribed by law. Each and every day a person continues to work shall constitute a separate offense and shall be subject to fines not to exceed seven hundred and fifty($750) dollars per offense. 19. Section 113.2 Schedule of permit fees. Shall be amended to read as follows: A fee for each permit shall be paid (as required) in accordance with the fee schedule as established by the applicable governing authority and the inter-governmental agreement with the Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District. As new fees are created or old fees are changed, the schedule of fees associated with the inter-governmental agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the United City of Yorkville. 20. Section 202 General Definitions. Shall be amended to include the following definition: Fire Alarm User — the owner of the property from which the false alarm originates, including but not limited to, any individual, partnership, corporation, organization or other entity occupying the property with the permission of the owner. 21. Section 505.3 Lightweight construction (new section).Shall be added to read: Buildings erected using lightweight construction systems to include: Wooden I-beams, wood trusses, metal trusses, or any combination thereof, shall provide signage identifying the structural system used on the exterior of the building as approved by the Fire Marshal. 22. Section 505.3.1 Emblem required (new section). Shall be added to read: An all-weather emblem identifying lightweight truss construction shall be provided, located and designed as follows: 1) Emblem shall be provided by the property owner. 2) Emblem shall be located within 6" inches of the fire department key box or fire department connection or at the discretion of the Fire Marshal. 9 3) The truss emblem shall be a sign consisting of an isosceles triangle not less than 10 inches by 6 inches vertical made of reflective material with a white background and red lettering containing the following: type of construction (type I, 11, 111, IV, V), the letter(s) "F" to signify a building or structure having a floor with truss construction; "R" to signify a building or structure having a roof with truss construction: or "FR" to signify a building or structure having both floor and roof with truss construction. Exception: Single family homes. 23. Section 507.5.1.1 Hydrant spacing (new section). Shall be added to read: A fire hydrant shall not be more than 100 feet travel distance from the fire department connection that it serves,unless approved by the Fire Chief. 24. Section 507.5.7 Hydrant Marking. Shall be added to read as follows: On all private parking areas of multiple-family residential, commercial and industrial uses, a "No Parking...Fire Hydrant" sign shall be placed in a conspicuous location to identify the restricted parking area. In addition to the required sign,the curb or pavement (only when a curb is not present) directly in front of the fire hydrant, shall be painted yellow with an approved material. The designated area shall be 15 feet (7.S feet on each side of the fire hydrant) in total length. 25. Section 901.6.2 Records. Shall be amended to read: The most recent records of all system inspections, tests, and maintenance required shall be maintained on premises and shall be forward to the Fire Prevention Bureau via e-mail, mail, or fax within 14 days after completion of inspection. 26. Section 903.7 Commercial multi-tenant occupancies. Shall be amended to include: All sprinklered multi-tenant occupancies hereafter constructed shall have an isolation control valve and water flow switch installed for each tenant space. 27. Section 907.1.2 Fire alarm shop drawings. Shall be amended to include: 1)All fire alarm systems shall be of the addressable type. 2)All multi-tenant occupancies shall be provided with a weather proof amber strobe light at the entrance of the tenant space that activate upon an alarm condition in that tenant space. 27. Section 903.2.1.1 Group A-1. Shall be amended to include the following: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-1 occupancies when the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet. 28. Section 903.2.1.2 Group A-2. Shall be amended to include the following: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-2 occupancies when the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet. 29. Section 903.2.1.3 Group A-3. Shall be amended to include the following: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-3 occupancies when the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet. 30. Section 903.2.1.4 Group A-4. Shall be amended to include the following: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group A-4 occupancies when the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet. 10 31. Section 903.2.2 Group B ambulatory health care facilities. Shall be deleted and changed to read as follows: Section 903.2.2 Group B. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all Group B occupancies when the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for all"Group B ambulatory health care facilities." 32. Section 903.2.3 Group E. Shall be amended to include the following: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all Group E occupancies when the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet. 33. Section 903.2.7 Group M. Shall be amended to include the following: An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all Group M occupancies when the fire area exceeds 10,000 square feet or the fire area is located more than three stories above the grade plane. 34. Section 903.2.8 Group R. Shall be amended to include the following: An automatic sprinkler system shall be required throughout Groups R-1, R-2, and R-4 occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be required throughout Group R-3 occupancies,with the following exceptions: 1. Adult care facilities that provide accommodations for five or fewer persons of any age for less than 24 hours. 2. Child care facilities that provide accommodations for five or fewer persons of any age for less than 24 hours. 3. Single-family detached homes shall be required to follow Section R313 of the 2009 International Residential Code (IRC), as amended. 35. Section 903.3.5 Water Supplies. Shall be amended to read as follows: Water supplies for automatic sprinkler systems shall comply with this section and the standards referenced in Section 903.3.1. The potable water supply shall be protected against backflow in accordance with the requirements of this section and the State of Illinois Plumbing Code. 36. Section 905.3.1 Height. Shall be amended to read as follows: An approved standpipe system shall be installed in all buildings three (3) stories or more in height in each stairwell at each level. Standpipe systems shall be installed in all buildings where any portion of the building floor area is more than 200 feet travel distance from the nearest point of the fire department vehicle access. 37. Section 907.1.3 Equipment. Shall be amended to include the following: 1. Location of the annunciator panel shall be approved by the Fire Code Official. 2. An annunciator panel or the main fire panel shall be placed near the fire sprinkler main riser. 3. A red strobe light shall be installed by the annunciator panel or above the closest entrance to the fire alarm control panel as approved by the Fire Code Official 4. The annunciator panel shall indicate and have all of the functions of the fire alarm panel. 5. The annunciator shall be properly marked to show each zone. 11 6. A detailed floor plan illustrating each zone shall be provided on each fire alarm control panel and located adjacent to each annunciator panel. 38. Section 907.2.1 Group A. Shall be amended to read, in part, as follows: A manual fire alarm system that activates the occupant notification system in accordance with Section 907.5 shall be installed in Group A occupancies having an occupant load of 100 or more. Portions of Group E occupancies occupied for assembly purposes shall be provided with a fire alarm system as required for the Group E occupancy. 39. Section 907.2.2 Group B. Shall be amended to read, in part, as follows: A manual fire alarm system shall be installed in Group B occupancies where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The combined Group B occupant load of all floors is 250 or more. 2. The Group B occupant load is more than 100 persons above or below the lowest level of exit discharge. 3. The Group B fire area contains a Group B ambulatory health care facility. 40. Section 907.2.4 Group F. Shall be amended to read, in part, as follows: A manual fire alarm system that activates the occupant notification system in accordance with Section 907.5 shall be installed in Group F occupancies where both of the following conditions exist: 1. The Group F occupancy is two or more stories in height; and 2. The Group F occupancy has a combined occupant load of 250 or more above or below the lowest level of exit discharge. 41. Section 907.2.5 Group H. Shall be amended to read as follows: A complete fire alarm system shall be installed in all group H occupancies. Any listed special detection devices approved for the specific hazard shall be approved by the Fire Marshal, such detection devices shall be connected to the fire alarm. 42. Section 907.2.7 Group M. Shall be amended to read as follows: A manual fire alarm system that activates the occupant notification system in accordance with Section 907.5 shall be installed in Group M occupancies where one of the following conditions exists: 1. The combined Group M occupant load of all floors is 250 or more persons. 2. The Group M occupant load is more than 100 persons above or below the lowest level of exit discharge. 43. Section 907.2.11.5 Group S.A new section shall be added to read as follows: A complete fire alarm system shall be installed in all Group S occupancies or as otherwise approved by the Fire Marshal. 44. Section 912.5 Backflow Protection. Shall be amended to read as follows: The potable water supply to automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems shall be protected against backflow as required by the State of Illinois Plumbing. 45. Section 912.1 Installation. Shall be amended to read as follows: Fire department connections shall be installed in accordance with the NFPA standard applicable to the system design and shall comply with Sections 912.2 through 912.6. The 12 fire department connection shall be an approved five inch (5") connection with a thirty (30) degree down turn. A white strobe light shall be placed above the fire department connection and the white strobe light shall indicate on water flow only. A two and one- half inch (2 %") NST single fire department connection shall be acceptable where piped to a three inch(3") or smaller riser. 46. Section 3301.1.6 Storage of Fire and Explosive Hazards. Shall be added as follows: The storage of fire and explosive hazards such as: detonable materials, hazardous solids, liquids, and gases shall comply with the Performance Standards established in the City's Zoning Ordinance, as amended from time to time. 47. Appendix D — Figure D103.1 Dead-End Fire Apparatus Access Road Turnaround. Shall be amended to read as follows: 96' Diameter Cul-de-sac as illustrated shall be changed to a minimum of 130 ft. ROW diameter and 100 ft.pavement diameter,per the City's Subdivision Control Ordinance. Staff Comments Staff is supportive of a majority of the amendments proposed by the Building Code Update Committee; however, a few recommendations require additional explanation: • Section 109.3.3 False Alarm Fees—The City Council will need to amend the intergovernmental agreement with the Bristol Kendall Fire District (BKFD) to approved proposed false alarm fees subsequent to approval of this code. • Sections 505.3 and 505.3.1 were added by BKFD and require all new buildings with lightweight construction, with the exception of single-family homes, to install an emblem on the exterior of the building so that it may be identified by fire personnel during an emergency. • Section 907.2.11.5 Group S will now require storage facilities to install a complete fire alarm system which will require annual monitoring inspections and fees. Should the City Council not be amenable to the above-referenced requirements, they may be deleted, revised or amended as desired. Staff Recommenda tion LZ Staff recommends approval of the 2009 International Fire Code as amended by the Building Code Update Committee and subject to any revisions approved by the City Council. VII. INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE®(2009) Summary The International Residential Code (IRC) addresses the design and construction of one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses, and also covering regulations for all structural components, fireplaces and chimneys, thermal installation, mechanical systems, fuel gas systems, plumbing systems and electrical systems. The separation of the IRC from the other I-Codes was to allow for the residential code provisions to be distinct from the non-residential and be specifically tailored to the structure and type of occupancy that fall within the appropriate code's scope. It is also designed to be beneficial to the plans reviewer and/or inspector by having all the I-Codes applicable to residential construction (electrical, plumbing, fuel gas, etc.)in a unified document. 13 BCUC Recommendations) The Building Code Update Committee recommended adopting the IRC 2009 with the following amendments: 1. Section R101.1 Title. Shall be amended to insert the name of jurisdiction — United City of Yorkville. 2. Section R105.2 Work Exempt from permit. Shall be amended as follows: Building: Delete items 1, 5,and 10. These items shall require permitting. 3. Table R301.2(1) Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria. Shall be completed with the following insertions. GroundSnow Load.........................................................................................................25 lbs/sq.ft. WindDesign(Speed).............................................................................................................90 mph Wind Design(Topographic effects).............................................................................................NO SeismicDesign Category.................................................................................................................B Subject to Damage from(Weathering)................................................................................... Severe Subject to Damage from(Frost line depth)..............................................................42"below grade Subject to Damage from(Termite)..................................................................... Moderate to Heavy Winter Design Temperature........................................................................................... -5 degrees F Ice Barrier Underlayment Required............................................................................................YES Flood Hazards..........................................................................................Refer to local designations AirFreezing Index.....................................................................................................................2000 Mean Annual Temperature............................................................................................48 degrees F 4. Section R302.5.1 Opening protection. Shall be amended to add language requiring self-closing devices for all required fire rated doors. 5. Section R310.4 Bars, grilles, covers and screens. Shall be amended to add language requiring safety covers capable of supporting at least 250lbs load. 6. Section R313.1 Townhouse automatic fire sprinkler systems. Shall be amended to read as follows: 7. Section R313.1 Townhouse and duplex automatic fire sprinkler systems. An automatic residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in townhouses and duplexes. 8. Section R313.2 One- and two-family dwellings automatic fire systems. Shall be deleted in its entirety. 9. Chapter 11 Energy Efficiency. Shall be deleted in its entirety and amended to read as follows: Compliance shall be determined by the current IECC. 10. Section P2501.1 Scope. Shall be amended to include the following: All plumbing work shall conform to the current edition of the State of Illinois Plumbing Code, the provisions of this code, and the currently amended edition of the International Plumbing Code;whichever is more restrictive. 11. Appendices to be included with the adoption of this code shall include: Appendix A,B, C,E,F, G, H, J,M, O 12. Section R105.2 Work Exempt from permit. Shall be amended to read as follows: 14 Building: 1. One-story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses,provided the floor area does not exceed 100 square feet(9.29 mz). 2. Decorative,temporary, or similar type fences not over 4 feet(1829 mm)high. 3. Retaining walls that are not over 4 feet (1219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall,unless supporting a surcharge. 4. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons(I 8,927L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2 to 1. 5. Painting,papering,tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops, and similar finish work. 6. Prefabricated swimming pools that are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep. 7. Swings and other playground equipment. 8. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall which do not project more than 54 inches (13 72 mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. 13. Section R202,Definitions. Shall be amended to include the following definition: Fence. A permanent enclosure or barrier, such as wooden posts,wire, iron, or any other allowable material erected for the purpose of providing a boundary or as a means of protection, or to prevent uncontrolled access, or for privacy screening or confinement, or for decorative purposes (such as an ornamental gate). Materials used to contain or separate a garden area, an earthen stockpile, a storm water basin, or any other similar temporary use shall not be classified as a fence. Staff Comments During the Building Code Update Committee's deliberations regarding the International Residential Code (IRC),the area of greatest debate pertained to the requirement for fire suppression systems (fire sprinklers) in residential structures. As written in the 2009 IRC, all newly constructed one- and two- family dwelling units are required to be fire sprinklered. Other communities have chosen to push the zero-threshold date out beyond 2012, while others have chosen to set a minimum square footage. Staff has proposed a compromise of requiring newly constructed residential structures over 3,500 square feet to have fire suppression systems, as most average single-family homes would not be immediately affected and those larger-sized homes which may need additional protection will be required to do so. Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approval of the 2009 International Plumbing Code as amended by the Building Code Update Committee subject to revising Section R313.2 One- and two-family dwelling automatic fire systems to apply to such newly constructed residential structures over 3,500 square feet. VIII. INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE"" (2009) Summary The International Building Code provides minimum requirements to protect the occupants of new and existing buildings and structures by addressing structural strength, means of egress, sanitation, adequate lighting and ventilation, accessibility, energy conservation and life safety. The IBC also 15 applies to all occupancies, including one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses that are not within the scope of the International Residential Code (IRC). BCUC Recommendations) The Building Code Update Committee recommended adopting the IBC 2009 with the following amendments: 1. 10 1.1 Title. Shall be amended to insert the name of jurisdiction - United City of Yorkville 2. 105.2 Work Exempt from permit. Shall be amended to read, in part, as follows: Building: 1. One-story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses,provided the floor area does not exceed 100 square feet(9.29 mZ). 2. Decorative,temporary, or similar type fences not over 4 feet(1829 mm)high. 3. 1612.3 Establishment of flood hazard areas. Shall be amended to insert the name of jurisdiction —Kendall County; and to insert the Flood Insurance Rate Map effective date—February 4,2009. 4. 2901.1 Scope. Shall be amended to read as follows: The provisions of this chapter, the Illinois State Plumbing Code and the International Plumbing Code shall govern the erection, installation, alteration, repairs, relocation, replacement, addition to, use or maintenance of plumbing equipment and systems. Plumbing systems and equipment shall be constructed, installed and maintained in accordance with the International Plumbing Code and the Illinois State Plumbing Code. 5. 3002.4 Elevator car to accommodate ambulance stretcher. Shall be amended to read as follows: Where elevators are provided in buildings two or more stories above, or two or more stories below, grade plane, at least one elevator shall be provided for fire department emergency access to all floors. The elevator car shall be of such a size and arrangement to accommodate an ambulance stretcher 24 inches by 84 inches (6 10 mm by 2134 mm)with not less than 5-inch(127 mm) radius corners, in the horizontal, open position and shall be identified by the international symbol for emergency medical services (star of life). The symbol shall not be less than 3 inches (76 mm) high and shall be placed inside on both sides of the hoist way door frame. The inside hand rail shall be set at the maximum thirty six (36") inch height allowed under ADA standards to better accommodate the ambulance stretcher. The cab size is to be a minimum five(5')foot by seven (7') foot platform and minimum 2500 lb capacity with a 42" side slide door. Exception: Single-family homes. Staff Comments None. Staff Recommendations Staff recommends approval of the 2009 International Building Code as amended by the Building Code Update Committee. IX. INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE®(2009) Summary 16 The International Existing Building Code (IEBC) is modeled to provide alternative approaches to remodeling, repairing or altering existing buildings which may not comply with the current building code requirements for new construction. Since repairs, renovations and additions/alterations of existing buildings maybe restrained by budgets or even cost-prohibitive if required to meet the current standards for newly constructed buildings, the IEBC is intended to make the rehabilitation process easier by allowing for controlled deviation from full compliance while maintaining basic levels for fire prevention, structural and life safety features of the existing structure. BCUC Recommendations) The Building Code Update Committee recommended adopting the IEBC 2009 without amendments. Staff Comments None. Staff Recommendation(s) Staff recommends approval of the 2009 International Existing Building Code. X. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (2005) Summary The National Electric Code (NEC) is published by the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) and provides standards and recommended practices related to electrical safety and safeguarding people and property from hazards arising from the use of electricity. The NEC is designed to cover the installation of electrical conductors, equipment, and raceways; signaling and communication conductors, equipment and raceways; and optical fiber cables and raceways in all public and private occupancy types and structures. The 2005 edition of the NEC was modeled to be fully compliant with the provisions of the 20061-Codes. BCUC Recommendations) Staff originally proposed adoption of the 2008 National Electric Code (NEC)with no amendments as this code is fully compliant with the 2009 I-Code series proposed for adoption by the city. However, after presentations and discussion regarding a component of the 2008 NEC related to the requirement for arc-fault systems throughout residential dwellings, it was the majority consensus of the BCUC to recommend adoption of the 2005 NEC without amendments which does not require the arc-fault system. Staff Comments Staff has subsequently obtained and reviewed the 2005 NEC to evaluate its compatibility with the 2009 series of I-Codes; although our analysis found no significant inconsistencies, the long term benefits derived from utilizing the most up-to-date codes in concert outweighs the initial inconvenience of the requirement for arc-fault systems. Staff Recommendation(sl Staff continues to recommend approval of the 2008 National Electric Code as originally proposed. 17 �a o, E,,,>2° Building Code Inquiry Bartlett 2006 IRC Will adopt new code in 2012 (every 6 years) Not for the sprinkler requirements-residential Batavia 2006 IRC Just adopted the 2006 Will adopt the new 2012 No SFD sprinkled, MFD only sprinkle 3 units or more Energy code, no amendments Carol Stream 2006 IRC Just adopted, no plans for 2009 Crystal Lake 2006 IRC Apprehensive regarding 2009 MFD Sprinkled starting 2008 No Energy codes for Residential, Yes commercial DeKalb Co. 2003 IRC—With Amendments Ag and rural no city water Du Page Co. 2009 All but using the SBOC IRC from the 1980's Fire Sprinklers-only if required by the fire protection district, or MFD or SFD over 5000 square foot The decision based on water conservation not life safety Energy Code—2009 no amendment Kane Co. 2003 IRC No plans to adopt the 2009 Gave up on fire sprinkler requirements due to the fire protection districts No residential sprinklers, commercial only Barrington 2000 IRC Plan to adopt 2009 early next year All new SFD, MFD &remodels sprinkled starting in the 1990's Illinois Energy Code Elburn 2000 IRC, 2003 IBC 2009—No Fire sprinklers—Not crazy about it Energy Code—No Lombard 2000 IRC 2009 after the first of the year No problem with the Fire sprinkler requirements, 2 year trigger Surrounding municipalities already have sprinkler requirements; Oak Brook, Glen Ellyn, Villa Park Energy Codes—Will be adding paid inspections for energy code after 1/1/10 Montgomery 2006 IRC Looking at the 2009 Fire sprinkler requirements is reason for delay Will probably amend Naperville 2006 IRC Adopt new code every 6 years for ISO requirements Fire sprinkler requirements is the reason they are skipping 2009 Believes the burden for the Building Department for sprinkler calculation is problematic. Energy Code Nov 15, 2008, will meet with the builders at the 1 st of the year, to discuss the $1,500 federal tax credit for the Energy Star Program. Wheaton 2003 IRC—2002 NEC Reviewing 2009—Plan to adopt Jan. 2010 Fire sprinkler requirement—have not presented to City Council yet in order to indentify the impact on homeowners, builders, etc. Energy codes— Struggling, especially with residential roofing. Hoffman Estates 2003 International Will adopt 2009—January 2010, likes the shear?Walls All residential dwellings have been fire sprinkler required since 1998, 2100 units are sprinkled Energy codes— state law must be taken as is Plainfield 2003 IRC & 2007 Village of Plainfield Codes Might adopt the 2006 IRC, not the 2009 specifically due to the fire sprinkler requirements for SFD St. Charles 2000 IRC Presently reviewing 2009 to adopt 1St of the year with local amendments Regarding fire sprinkler requirements for SFD, all commercial sprinkled Aurora 2000 IRC 2009 to adopt April 2010 May adopt the 2006 IRC instead because they are not ready for the change to residential regarding fire sprinkler requirements Geneva 2003 IBC 2006 IRC 2006 IBC in 2010 Not ready for the 2009 IRC—Geneva does not require residential sprinkling BUILDING CODE UPDATE COMMITTEE 2010 MUNICIPALITY PLUMBING CODES CONFLICTS CONCERNS WITH THE HOW DO YOU REGULATE ADOPTED BETWEEN THE CODES 2009 INTERNATIONAL G RAY WATE R SYSTE M S? PLUMBING •D 2006 International Illinois State Plumbing Has not addressed the 2009 There are no gray water systems in Plumbing Code Code is more stringent International Plumbing Code. Plano. PLANO and will always defer to 2004 Illinois State the stricter code. Plumbing Code 2006 International Illinois State Plumbing Has not addressed 2009 will Does not allow gray water systems at Plumbing Code Code is more stringent wait for the 2012 Codes. present. OSWEGO and will always defer to 2004 Illinois State the stricter code. Plumbing Code 2006 International Illinois State Plumbing Will wait for 2012 Codes. No regulations, has not yet been Plumbing Code Code is more stringent addressed. Will wait until the next NAPERVILLE and will always defer to Illinois State Plumbing Code is 2004 Illinois State the stricter code. approved. Plumbing Code 2006 International Illinois State Plumbing Has not addressed the 2009 Will address when the next Illinois Plumbing Code Code is more stringent International Plumbing Code. State Plumbing Code is approved. BOLINGBROOK and will always defer to Concerned with costs of green 2004 Illinois State the stricter code. systems. Plumbing Code P:\Bldg Code Update Committe\BCUC Research-Plumbing.doc International Codes-Adoption by Jurisdiction (Updated 07-01-2010) 7- makes every effort to provide current accurate code adophdn rnformalron Nol all��nsdlchpns no bfy ICC of code adoptions To obfarn more•dela,led a+.farmauon nn a endmenls and changes to adopted cades please canfacl the iyns0intrpn To sdbmrt Code aoopbon mfprmatw —--le.orgadopnons X R ElfeCive StatevAde A-Adopted,bud may not yet be effective L e Adopted by Lord GowffWmnla PV1'-Pubke Verslen 1,0 r..3 -E morr 00-2049 EdlBon 08 a 20M EdiDon 04-2004 Ed'dion 03-2003 Eddlon 00-2000 Edition ST kwkdictl*n INC AN lit PAC ' IIV(; IPSDC IFGC IGCC IECC IPMC rEttC KtPC iUMr ti( ICC 700 chart Comments DE Lewes L03 L03 L03 DE New Cas6eCou LOB L06 L06 LOS LOS LOS L06 LOS DE Newark L06 LOS L06 LOG LOS LOG LOG LOS DE Sussex C L03 L03 DE WifingigID11 L03 L03 L03 FL Fbrida X06 XOG )(06 X06 X06 X06 L05 X06 The 2001 Ronda Codas wkh 1009 suppkmeets an based on the 2006!-Coder. FL Fod Meade LOS LOG L06 LAG L06 L06 LOG L06 FL Talahassee LOS L06 LOG LOS LOS L06 LOS L06 GA GoogLa X01 X06 X06 X06 Me X01 X06 L L GA Cohlmbus LOS LOS LOB LOG LOG L06 L06 LOS GA DWWDWY Loa LOS LOS LOS LOS LOG LOS LOS GA Likierly Cminly LOS L05 LOB LOB LOB L06 LOS L06 GA Milton LOS LOS L06 LOG L06 L06 L06 L03 L03 GA Smar HID L03 L03 GA Thanashlls LOS L06 LOG L06 L06 L06 L06 L03 HI HMO X06 L03 LOB 1 X06 M C and olHonakftu L06 LOG L06 M CMtYofRw2j LOG,LOS HI Ceu of Kauai L06 L06 L09 * Cotififyofmaw L06 ID 11daho X06 X06 XD6 X03 LOB LOG X03 L01 X01 X06 ID lAceqWa L06 LOG LOS L03 L03 L06 L03 ID Ada County LOS LOG LOS Loft LOG LOS ID Bogie LOS Los LOG L03 L03 L06 ID BonneaiDe CGUM L06 L06 L06 L03 L03 L06 ID Camel LOB L06 L06 LOS L06 LOG ID Cleanindu Courfly L06 L06 LOG LD3 L03 L06 ID ReAum L06 LOS LOS L03 L03 LOS L03 ID Idaho Fall L06 L06 LOB LOS LOB LOB LOS LOS L06 ID Jerome L06 LOS L06 L03 L03 L06 L03 ID Lewiston L06 LOB LOG L03 L03 LOB ID Radian LOG L06 LOB L03 L03 LD3 LOS Loa D0 Mmidoka LOS L06 L06 L03 LD3 LOS L03 • Mndoka County L06 Lob LOS L03 L03 LDS L03 ID Narnpa LOS LOB L06 L06 ID Paul LOS L06 106 103 L03 L06 L03 ID Pocatdb LOS LOS LOS LOS L06 LOS LOG L03 a3 lRupel L06 L06 L06 L03 L03 LOS L03 Supplament for cammerclata hudwnstafewide.WC, FFC,W,iFGC,1FK IECC,IEBC forll Bond of Edu FaeWks(odw kn vehWaij,But do no apply to 0. [0fnds X09 L XOl X09 L L X04 X04 X04 X09 L L L Cbkago.I BGadWtadhyDaptofHeallAfarhospftfs where loaf codes do not apply.The Moir EowV Conservation Cade fs based on the 2009IECC. IL Addison LOO Loa LOO L00 Loa LOO LOU L00 IL Akdo L03 L03 L03 LD3 L03 n h LOS LOS L06 Loft LOfi L06 L06 L06 IL in L03 Loa LD3 rL Andover L03 L03 L03 L03 LD3 L03 International Codes-Adoption by Jurisdiction (Updated 07-01-2010) r�1f1+1.IIy..I ..IIrn7 I4 1-ua.Ul gfu,.q,u T.: . 1r ..t. I%1-u1 rlleronahnu IWI I ... .r. udlry Mr-NJ _.. 1x1`9ir:.,... . ... .dlrtldUUr 1NI cWpr cao [he Iw_-I. -.n9. e d"lm rrnb df%d L anlrrW deal'o a .. . arQ.�sham X-E6edrve Statewide A a Adopted,but nM not yet be effective L-Adopted by Local Governments PVt'-Public Version 1.0 8-Supplement DO-2008 Edition Da-2008 Edition 04 a 2004 Edam 03-2003 Eddion OD-2000 Edition ST AWisdbcnon �w IR[ I IK I 1MC I WC IPSDC IFGC IGCC 1ECC IPMC 188C ICCPC 1UtMC RC ICE 700 Chart Commend R Ardoch L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 R Apple Carw Lake POA Lao LOO L00 L00 LOO LOD LOO Lao It ArkqWn He'his LOO Loa L03 L03 Loa R ,Altura Park L03 L03 L03 IL Aehlon L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 LD3 L03 L03 It Atkinson L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 It Aumm L L L L L L L R n LOD Loo L00 LOO LOO Lao LOO IL Bartle" Leh L06 I LOG L06 L06 LO9 L06 IL Baievia LOS L06 L06 L06 LOS LOB LOS IL Ream Park LOO IL Bedford Park LOD L00 LOD IL Beedter LOO R Ballovilb L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 R BeOaood L06 LOB LOG LOS LOB L05 LOG L06 L06 R Behrdere L03 L03 L03 R Bemenv& L95 R saoft L03 It BeIr 103 L03 L03 L03 L03 R Belhgo L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Big Rock L06 LOS LOG LOS LOS L06 LOG LOS IL Bloantirtadala L03 L03 L03 L03 LD3 LD3 R sbwmqtm L06 LOB LOS LOS LOB L06 L06 IL Bkie Island L00 L03 R BO brook LOS L06 L06 LOG L06 L06 L06 L06 L06 R Bonfield L03 LO) 1-03 0 Boone County L03 L03 R Bourbonnne L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 R Bourbonnais Me Protection DmW L03 L03 R Draft Loa LOO LOD LOD R BrsdNOOd Loo L00 !O0 L00 too !00 R Breese L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 R L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Emkirighmn LOO LOO LOO L00 LOO IL Buffalo Gave L06 L06 L06 L06 L06 LOB LOS L06 LOG IL Burbank L03 L03 L03 L03 IL BurrRidue L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 R Bywn L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 !03 L03 LD3 Loa R CaMko L L L L L L L L L It Caledonia LOS L06 L06 LOG LOS L06 L06 LOS IL Calumet chy LOG L06 L03 L06 LOO L06 L06 LOG R CakmtetPark L03 L03 L03 L03 LOO L03 L03 L03 L03 R camww L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 It Conlon LO) L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Ca*al L L L L L L L L L R Carbondale L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 R Carol Strewn L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 R CRY, L96 L96 R C n Lao LOD LOO LOO too IL Channahan L06 L06 R Charleston L03 L03 I L03 i m L03 I L03 L03 L03 Loa International Codes-Adoption by Jurisdiction (Updated 07-01-2010) G:ma2e, rry 10W!o pl,d, -CE ltloabon ii -I.N ICC of-a,ruoopCna r,ohl. n mp•• tlel.r l d nrpim V.,r rd_h."q —d— ply lun;d,cf— .1,—I bpd,:tt•_pl— rt•rmalior r i. .al• ndp pf:n. X-Effective SLetewtde A-Adopted,but may net Val be affecbre L-Adopted by Lout Gevemmente PV1•-Public Version 1.0 s-supplement 00-2008 Men 09-2009 Edition 04-2004 Eddron 03-2003 Edition 0O-2000 Edlllua ST luris�ctlan IYC xl `Ik IMC WC WSOC IFGC IGCC IECC IPMC 1119[ ICCPC IUWK iZ[ ] )CC 700 Mort CammeMs IL Cho Vase Fore Pmkctkm DbIrid L03 I' L ' iL03 p' LO3 L03 L03 L03 sna Park a LOS LOS LOB LOS LOS LOS IL Clear Lake Vila L L L L L L L L L 0. C6rdan LOO LOO L03 IL Coal C LOO LOU L00 LDO IL Coansvile L L L L L L L L IL Cdkrunbia L06 LOS LOS LOS LOS L06 LOS IL CoMand L06 LOG LOG LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS IL Country Chub His LOO LOO LOU LOO LOO LOO Lon LOO 0. CouritrysAe L06 106 LOB L06 LOB LOB LOS IL Countirside Fie Osbid LDD IL Crest HE LOO LOD LOO IL Crekm L03 L03 L03 L03 Lon L03 L03 1.03 L03 IL Crete L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 I L03 LO) rL CroWLaks LOO LOO LOO LOO rL Darrvb L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Darien L98 198 US IL De Kam L03 L03 L03 L03 Ii. De Kalb County L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 LOO 0. Demur LOS L06 L06 L06 LOG R. Deerfield LOD Loa LOO LOO Loa Loa rL Dee Planes L06 LOS LOS LOS LOS LOS LOG LOS IL Diunwr LOO LOO LOO L00 LOO IL D'aon L03 L03 L03 L03 LO3 Lo] L03 L03 L03 IL Dolion L03 IL Dormers Grove LOO LOO LOO too LOO IL DuPage County Log L09 L09 L09 L06 L09 IL Durand L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL EvW& L03 L03 L03 IL East Alton L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 1.03 L03 IL East Dundee Loa LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO IL East Maine L03 L03 L03 L03 Lai L03 L03 IL East Peoria L03 L03 L03 L93 IL 115diltardsville LOB L06 LOS LOG L03 LOS LOS IL Ebw L03 LOO L03 L03 IL Elgin L03 L03 L03 L03 LD3 L03 IL Elk Grove Abu L96 L97 IL Elmhurst L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Eltneood Park L03 L03 Ltl3 L03 L03 IL Elwood L03 L03 L03 IL Ehrood Fire Protection DM d L03 L03 IL EvartsWn L03 L03 L03 L03 Ltl3 L03 0. Evergreen Park 103 L03 LOO L03 L03 rL Flora L03 L03 L03 LOO L00 1L Flosannor L05 LOG LO6 LOS LOS) L06 R Ford He tits Lai L03 L03 L03 IL FoVt I L L I L I I L IL Fox Labs I LOO I L96 International Codes-Adoption by Jurisdiction Updated 07-01-2010) 'CC makes every effort to pray-de current accurate code adophon information.Not all lurwd,chons noldy ICC of code adoptions To obtain more 10.,Iell mformatian on amendmenls and changes to adapted codus please contact the lunsd,cbon To submd code ioopt or nformahon —ccsafe orq'aaophons X-E9ecdve Stelewtds A-Adopted,bat may not yet be effective L-Adopted by Loin Govemmente PV1•-Puw Version 1.0 8-StrMMlernenl 09-213D9 Eddion 00-2000 Union W-29M Edition 03-20133 Editon 00-2000 Edition ST Awkidk"M ] HkC FRC I IK I 'I MC �. CPC IPSDC IFGC IGCC IECC IPMC IE9C ICCVC IUWIC R( ICC 900 Chart Comments IL Fox PAvrGma LOS LOS LOS LOS L LOS LOS LOS IL Frankkbl LOO LOO LOO LOD IL FreePird LOO LOO LOD IL Galena LOS LOS LOS L06 L06 LOS IL GUIesborg L06 L06 L06 LOG LOG IL lGeni L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Geneva L03 L66 L03 L03 L03 L03 L06 IL GdLefte L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Glen C2rbon L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Glen Elyn L03 L03 LD3 L03 L03 L03 IL Glencoe LO3 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Glendale Heights LOO LOO LOD LDO LOD LOD LOO IL Glenvlea L98 L98 LOO L98 I Glenwood L03 IL Goft LOD LOO LOD LOO IL Gwits city LOS LOS LOS L06 IL ke L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Gurnee L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Haitms* LOO IL hire LOD LOO LOD LOO LOO LOO LOO LOD IL Hanover Park L03 L03 t03 L03 LO) L03 IL Harvard LOD LOD LOO LOO IL HMM LOD LOO LOG LOO IL Harwood Heights L03 IL Hawlhom woods LOO LOO IL Hazel crest L L R Hebron L03 IL lfclwry H7s L03 L03 L03 L03 IL IHMhLfind L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL MgMand Park L06 LOG L06 LOD LOG IL Boast L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 LOS L03 L03 —IL If-ft LOO LOD LOD LOD LOD L00 LOD LOO IL HsndAs LOO LOD LOD L00 LOD LOD LOO LOD L03 IL Holfinen Estates L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Renter den LOS L06 LOG L016 L06 LOS L06 IL Hbrrroteem L03 L03 LD3 L03 IL lHornufflood L03 L03 L03 LD3 L03 L03 A. Huntley L03 L03 L03 L03 R Ituwts Departnerd or Heath LOD Ho Llcena Regwrement IL Mavis Slate Board of Edlrmmn L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL 11inbm Slate Univers L03 IL Inverness L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 R County L03 L03 L03 iL island Lake LOG LOO LOD IL pasta L98 L95 IL JacksomiM LOO LBO LOD LOD IL Jere Cbu L06 L06 L06 L06 Ltl6 Ltl6 Ltl6 L06 D. Jars LOS LOS L06 L06 LO6 LO6 L06 L06 IL JoGaviesCoun L03 L03 L03 Ltl3 IL Joliet L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 Ltl3 IFGC rrlerrrtce m IBC IL Jostbe L03 L03 I L03 International Codes-Adoption by Jurisdiction (Updated 07-01-2010) ICC n,, ,c-,ra nffar,n p,o d,r,u,—, incur.I,,:od,:=dool,o, dfnrmalrnn rdo,au Windy ICC of,ad..adopt , u ub1 00 ail,"1 in mal,nn or'a", d,,MI5 end:na nq—I dop,,d Id, pig -:.:-eu1111 l 1n.;lun'd-el,on.r0 S Ud-g G If,= •duo I, �nlCrmal,nr N W,gee,ale orp'.-•p Up,on-, X-Will Sla Well A=Adapted,had may not yet bit aRacWa L-Adopted by Leal Geremmerns PV1•-Public Version 1,0 a-Supplement 00.2009 Edition W-2000 Edition 04.2001 Edition 03-2003 Edition 00-2000 Edition ST jAwhillkliefe I lot lAi I CPC I ILMC I lk IPSDC IFGC I IGCC IECC IPMC IEBC ICCPC IUWtC RC ICC 700 Chart ConimenK IL Kane County L03 L03 LO] L03 IL 1(ankekee L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Kankakee County L03 L03 L03 IL Kendall Courl L03 L03 LO3 IL Witter LOD IL Koffstifin L06 LOG L06 L06 L06 L06 L06 L06 0. I(iTHww L06 L06 L06 L06 L06 L06 LOS LOS IL La Grams Park L98 L98 IL Lake WIT L03 h Lake County L96 D. Lake Forest L03 L03 L03 IL Lake in the His L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Lake Zurich LOO LOO LOD LOO Lao IL Lalunil L03 IL Lansinit L00 LOD LOD LOO IL LaSab L L L L L L IL LaSalle County L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Le R LOS L06 LOG L06 IL Lee LOD LOO L00 LOO LOD LOO LOD R Lemont L L L L L L IL Lbulywille L06 LOS Leff LOS LOG LO6 L06 L03 IL LjY Lake L03 L03 L03 IL Lhooklshue L06 LOS LOG LOG LOS LOB L06 IL Lumairmood L03 L03 L03 L03 rL tLindephruirst LOG LOG LOG LOS LOB IL LRki L03 L96 IL Li6d field LOS L06 L06 LOB L06 IL Lockwd LOD LOD LOD IL Lockport Township Film Protection L03 L03 Distrid IL Lombard LOD LOD LOD LOD IL Lom G ul"Fee Pmlection DeW LOD IL ILoves Park LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO LOD IL LYMMW L06 LOG L06 LOG L06 L06 IL Lyons L03 IL Mxwb LOO LOO LOD LOD IL Malta LOD IL Manhatlarl LOS LOG LOG LOG L06 L06 LOS LOS 8_ Manteno L00 LOD LOD LDO LOO LOO LOO IL fth Park LOO LOD LOO LOU LOD LOO LDO IL Markhw LOO IL Mal L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 R Matteson L03 L03 L03 L03 LD3 L03 L03 L03 IL M&Um L03 L03 LO] L03 L03 IL mmmod LD3 IL McCook L03 L03 L03 L03 IL McHenry County LOD LOO LOO LOD IL Merri0ne8e Park L00 LOD LOD 4 McBawa L03 L03 LD3 IL IMmooke L03 L03 L03 L03 LO) L03 L03 1 L03 L03 K Mokena LOD LOO LOO LOD I LOO International Codes Adoption by Jurisdiction (Updated 07-01-2010) iCC makes every effort to provide current accurate code ndcptlon rntonnauon.Not all lunsdretrons nonty ICC of code adoph—. To obtain more detailed information on amendments and chances to adopted codes please contact the lursdrclron To Suhmrt code idoplum mformatron gavw,ccsale,orgradoounns %=Eflectrve Statewide A=Adopted,but may not yet be eflectrve L-Adopted by Local Gwemmenls PV1•-Pubsc Version 1.0 S-Supplement D9-2009 Edition 06-2006 Edition 04-2004 Ediion 03-2003 Edillon 00-2000 EdMw ST I IeC —1 fliC Tk :1 We :':-WE fPSDC I IFGC IGCC tECC IPMC 160C ICCPC IUVAC T1c ICC 700 Chart comments IL Moline L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Mom L03 L03 L03 L03 0. Montgomery L06 L06 LOS Ltl6 0. Modan LOO IL MuftrL Given L97 1.9E 0. Imourd Prosped LOG LOO IL ML Carmel L06 LOS LO6 LOS LO6 LOS IL MLVemon L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 0. Mlmdeleil L L 0. Mmak Los L06 L06 LOG LOS L06 L06 L06 X New Lenox L06 LOU LOS L06 LOB LO6 LOS IL Niles LOS L06 L06 LOS LOS L06 L06 IL Normal L06 LOB L06 L06 L06 L06 IL Womdae L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL WithA6mra 1.00 LOO LOO L00 LOO R Nodh Bari n LOD LOO LOO LOD IL Nerlh Ch a L03 L03 L03 LOS IL Northbrook Lob LOS L06 L06 L06 L06 LOS L06 0. Northwest Homer Firs Dished L L 0. Oak Brook L00 LOG L00 LOO 0. Oak Forest L05 LOS L03 L06 L06 L06 d RMab.n L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 R emce L03 R is LOO LOO LOO L00 LOD LOD 0. L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL lds LOO LOO 1.00 LOD LOD LOO L06 IL Protediorl b d1r d L06 LO6 IL L03 L03 L03 L 03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL LOO LOD LOO L96 LH IL Otawe LOG L06 L06 IL Pal�rte L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 0. Pabs LOO LOB LOO L06 LOU L05 Lob L06 L06 LOD rL Palos Park L06 LOG LOS LOS 0. Pana LOD 0. Paris L03 LOD 1L ParkForesl L03 0 Park Ridge L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Paw Paw L03 IL Peke L03 L03 LOS L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 0. Peoria LOG L06 LOS L06 LOS L06 L03 L06 IL Peoria Cau L06 LOS L06 LOG Los LOS LOS L06 rL Peotone L L L L 0. Phoenix 103 L03 IL Plaidrekf L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL PrvwWon L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Prosped He is L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 0. L06 L06 LOD L06 L06 IL RantoW LOS L06 LOS LOS LOS L06 L06 Ltl6 IL Red Bud L03 rL Richmond L03 IL Richton Park LOD I LOD I Lou I LOU International Codes-Adoption by Jurisdiction (Updated 07-01-2010) 'CC maker every effort to provide current accurate code anopltan nformallon Not all ldnsdichons nobly ICC of code Adoption, To oola,n trot e delajeo irfo Finalw on AMend Menls anll Changes to adapted codes please collU the Junsd,cIron.To submd Gcde 000pllon inform Allon W IC C Safe oryfadept,on5 X-Effective SlataoMs A-Adopted,NA may ml yet be effectrve L-Adopted by Local Governments PV1'-Pubbe Version 1.0 S-SupDklm rd 09-2009 Edition 08-2006 Edition 04.2004 Edition 03-2003 Edition 00-2000 Edition s!' lurisQLrrion Igit, A}4C l 1 11�1C' ` IV( - tvsae IiG[ MCC IECC IPMC 1ESC ICCPC IUWIC MC ICC 744 cj chafe Comn+eets IL RiMerGrwe L00 LOO LOO LOO IL Ri orsde LOS L06 L06 L06 LOS LOS LOS L06 L06 IL Rollbkls LOO LOO LO0 LOO 0. Rachele L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Rack Fa11s L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 703 L03 IL Rock Island L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 0. RocklslandCdu L03 L03 L03 IL Rockford L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Rolling Meadows L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 0. Romeovile L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 Q. Roscoe L03 0. Round Lake L06 LOG LOS L06 LOS LOS LOS LOG M. Round Lake Beach LOO LOO L00 L00 LOG L00 I Samamn Gouniv L06 LOS L06 LOS L LOS LOS L L 0. Schmunbum L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L0] L0] IL Sdd w Palk LOS LOS LOB LOS LOS LOS LOB IL Seem L 0. Shahhona LOO L00 LOO L00 L00 LOO LOO LOO IL Shorewood L03 L03 L03 IL Skokie LOG L06 L06 L06 IL Sleepv Holum, L03 L03 L03 0. Somonauk L03 L03 L03 L03 IL South Elgin L03 L03 1.03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Soulh l lobnd L06 L06 LOG LOS L06 L06 L06 LOS IL Sparls L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 H. Gmve L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Springfield L06 L06 L06 LOS L06 LOS 0. SL Rene L03 L03 L03 IL SL Cbzbs L03 L00 L03 L03 L03 0. ahmf L96 0. staft LOS LOG LOS LOS L06 LOS LOS I Streamwood L00 LOO LOO L00 IL Shaw Los L06 L06 LOS LOG L06 LOS IL Smar Grow LOO LOO LOU L00 1-00 IL Thamton L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL ThIlliffy Park L06 L05 LOS LOS LOS L06 0. Troy L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Tuscola LOO LOO L00 I V. IL Union LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO IL Union L03 L03 L03 IL Vemon Hills LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO IL Villa Park L98 L98 703 IL Washinatm L03 L03 IL Watedoo L00 L00 LOO 0. Wauconda L03 L03 L03 L03 103 L03 L03 0. Wayne L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL West Chicago L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 0. WestDurdee L00 L00 LOO LOO L00 LOO LOO LOO IL Westchester LOO LOO LOO L00 IL Western Springs L L IL Weshmol L03 International Codes-Adoption by Jurisdiction (Updated 07-01-2010) I fi Mom�r del.a,i. .. i �' a-e-+alhu 6"d. sJU>'Itlhu° 5+wat X-Effective Statewide A-Adopted,bid mey not yet be effec6we L a Adopted by Local Govnnrmenle PVV-Public Version 1.0 _.__. S i 2LgVk—.m 09-350P.Edition 05-2000 Edition 04 206A Edition 03 a 2003 Edition 00-2000 Edition ;fL S n 113(', ni( IK IM[ m( 1PSUC W-GC WC IECC IPM[ IEBC ICCPC IUVAC ¢( � ICC ADO Chan Commenn L03 L03 L03 L0) L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 LOD L00 Lon LOO LOO LOO LOD s L98 L91 L98 L48 L96 IL LOG L06 L06 LOS LD9 Elfective00A1R010 IL Winfield LOO LOU IL Wmaetka L03 2 Vmthmp Harbor LOG IL Woad Date L03 L96 L97 IL woogindga L03 L90 IL Woodstock LOO L98 LOO LOO D_ Wafh L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IL Ydrkvile LOO LOO L00 L00 LDO LOO LOO LOD IL ton LOO LOO LOD LDO LOO 7M 2000 kmW&BuOdhV and Fuel Gas Codes and Elan 2000 Maw Machudcof and Fba PmvwWdn Codes W IN Indlena XOG X03 X00 X00 X00 20W anendmerrb sin horsed on ft 2W MC,fFGC,fMiC and IFC-The 200]buffarra ReslderrEW Colo&Lased an IWO}003IRC. IN Fort Wirm L06 L06 L06 IBC,IRC,AEC,fEBC,IECC.Stale awned andredhd structures,the form Code whh wwmhw tt h based on ft 200!IBC,IRC,INC,IECC,ardIEBC The Sfafe Fha a lowwa X09 X09 X09 X09 L L L X09 L X09 L Cods with amendramts Is based on tw 2009/PC and ISC chapter 2-7.Ian has bplarnenfeddm MGRS PVC-700) forresldudlaf combucflan as part odlfs oftf to lncerparafesusfahaable desip starxW*Into Rs Stafa BuOdfip Codes. IA Adel A03 L03 L03 L03 L06 L06 a AOumeD LOB L06 IA Mfoom LOG L06 LOG LOS L06 L06 LOG LOS FA Arms L03 L03 L03 W Ankeny LOS LOB LOS L06 L06 L06 L06 IA AsIoury LOO L00 IA Atlantic L06 LOG LOG LOG L06 L06 L06 L06 LOG IA Bettendoff L03 L03 L03 L03 IA Bondurant LOO LOO LOO LOD LOD IA Boom LOO LOO IA Bremer Coun!y LDO LOO LOO LOD IA BulfintiIiin L03 L03 103 L03 L03 L03 IA Cedar FIItls L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IA Cerder Point L03 L03 L03 L03 IA Cfmlon L06 L06 L06 LOS Leh LOB IA GWe L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 103 ]A CordWis L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 W Council Bluffs L13 L03 LOO L03 L03 L03 103 k Dafas C L03 L03 L03 L03 L03 IA Damriport L03 L03 International Codes-Adoption by State (Updated 07-01-2010) ICC makes every effort to provide current,accurate code adoption information.Not all jurisdictions notify ICC of code adoptions. To obtain more detailed information on amendments and changes to adopted codes,please contact the jurisdiction.To submit code adoption information:www.iccsafe.org/adoptions X=Effective Statewide A=Adopted,but may not yet be effective L=Adopted by Loral Governments I*=Public Version 1.0 S=Supplement 09=2009 Edition 06=2006 Edition 04=2004 Edition 03=2003 Edition 00=2000 Edition ST Jurisdiction IBC ,C IMC IPC IPSDC IFGC IGCC IECC IPMC IEBC ICCPC IUWIC RC ]CC 700 Chart Comments IBC,IRC,IFC,IMC,IPC,IFGC-AL Building Commission: AL Alabama X09 X09 X09 X09 X09 L X09 L L L L L state owned,schools,hotels,movie theaters.AL has also adopted the 2008/CC 500 for storm shelters. AK Alaska X06 L06 X06 X06 X06 LO6 AZ Arizona X06 L X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 L L L L AZ-Dept of Health Services,health care institutions AR currently uses the 2007 AR Fire Prevention Code based AR Arkansas X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 L X06 X03 L L on the 2006 IFC,IBC and IRC. The 2006 AR Plumbing Code based on the 2006 IPC and the 2006 AR Fuel Gas Code based on the 2006 IFGC. CA currently adopts the 2006 IBC&IFC as the base model codes for the CA 2007 Building Standards Code. CA also adopts a portion of the IEBC,Apx A,Chapter 1 which is CA California X09 X09 X09 X09 published in Volume 11 of the 2007 CA Building Code. California adopted the 2009 IBC,IRC,IFC and IEBC on 01/12/2010 with an effective date of 01/01/2011. The 2010 CA Construction Codes will be based on the 20091-Codes. All State Buildings&Facilities.,IBC,IMC,IPC,IFGC,IECC. CO Colorado X06 L X06 X06 X06 L X06 X06 L L L L L All Public Schools&Junior Colleges:IBC,IFC,IMC,IPC, IFGC IFC:Portions used in the CT State Fire Code,ICC/ANSI CT Connecticut X03 X03 X03 X03 X03 X06 L X03 A117.1.The 2005 CT Fire Safety Code Guidebook is based on the 2003 IFC(along with NFPA 1 and NFPA LSC-2003). The 2005 State Building Code is based on the 2003 IBC. DE Delaware L L L L X03 L X09 L L 2009 IECC,optional adoption after 01/012010,mandatory adoption after 0710112016 DC District of Columbia X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 FL Florida X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 L06 X06 The 2007 Florida Codes with 2009 supplements are based on the 20061-Codes. GA Georia X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 L L HI Hawaii X06 1-03,1-06 X06 ID Idaho X06 X06 X06 X03,1-06 LO6 X03 L06 X06 X06 Supplement for commercial structures statewide.IBC,IFC, IMC,IFGC,IPMC,IECC,IEBC for IL Board of Edu Facilities IL Illinois X09 L X09 X09 I. L X09 X09 X09 X09 L L I_ (other than vehicular),but do not apply to Chicago.IBC adopted by Dept of Health for hospitals where local codes do not apply. The Illinois Energy Conservation Code is based on the 2009 IECC. The 2006 Indiana Building and Fuel Gas Codes and the 2006 IN Irdd.a,;a. X06 X03 X06 X06 X06 Indiana Mechanical and Fire Prevention Codes w/2008 amendments are based on the 2006 IBC,IFGC,IMC and IFC. The 2003 Indiana Residential Code is based on the 2003 IRC. IBC,IRC,IMC,IEBC,IECC:State owned and rented structures. The Iowa Code with amendments is based on the 2009 IBC,IRC,IMC,IECC,and IEBC. The State Fire Code IA lova X09 X09 X09 X09 L L L X09 L X09 L with amendments is based on the 2009 IFC and IBC Chapters 2-7.Iowa has implemented the NGBS(ICC-700)for residential construction as part of its effort to incorporate sustainable design standards into its State Building Codes. KS Kansas X03 X03 X03 L03 L03 L L03 X06 L L Applies to state owned facilities Kentucky,with amendments,has adopted the 2006 editions of IBC and IRC statewide.In the KBC(Kentucky Building Code) the state has adopted by reference the 2006 editions of the KY Ke,tu,k, X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 L IMC and IECC.The 2006 IFC is utilized for new construction projects.While the Kentucky codes are applicable statewide, enforcement is only mandatory statewide for commercial buildings.lECC:bldgs other than 1&2 family regulated by the International Codes-Adoption by State (Updated 07-01-2010) ICC makes every effort to provide current,accurate code adoption information.Not all jurisdictions notify ICC of code adoptions. To obtain more detailed information on amendments and changes to adopted codes,please contact the jurisdiction.To submit code adoption information:www.iccsafe.org/adoptions X=Effective Statewide A=Adopted,but may not yet be effective L=Adopted by Loral Governments PV1*=Public Version 1.0 S=Supplement 09=2009 Edition 06=2006 Edition 04=2004 Edition 03=2003 Edition 00=2000 Edition ST Jurisdiction IBC IRC IFC IMC IPC IPSDC IFGC IGCC IECC IPMC IEBC ICCPC IUWIC ¢C ]CC 70 - Chart Comments LA currently uses the 2000 LA State Plumbing Code based on LA Louisiana X06 X06 L X06 X06 X06,L L X06 the 1994 Standard Plumbing Code.They also use the LA One-and Two-Family Supplement to the 2006 IMC which is based on the 2006 IRC Mechanical section. The Maine Building and Energy Codes adoption date is June 1,2010.Towns that have a population of 2,000 and over,can ME Maine X09 X09 L L L L L X09 L X09 L either implement this code effective June lst,or can continue using their own model building code that's in place until December 1st However,effective December 1,2010,all towns must use the Uniform Building Code that was adopted. IPC:Industrialized housing.Other codes:edition shown may MD Maryland X09 X09 X09 X09,1- L L X09 X09 X09 not be in use locally;check with localjurisi iction.The MD Building Performance Standards are based on the 20091- Codes. MA state code will be based on the 2009 IBC,IEBC,IFC and IECC.BBRS is allowing a 6-month concurrency period, through June 30,2010,during which either the previous code MA Massachusetts ..., XC3 A03 X09 (the 2006 IECC with the 2007 IECC Supplement and MA amendments)or the new code may be used.Commencing July 1,2010,the baseline energy conservation requirements of the State Building Code will default to IECC 2009 and MA larnen ants, The State of Michigan has,with amendments,adopted for enforcement statewide the 2006 editions of IBC,IRC,IMC, and IEBC.IFGC,IPMC,IUWIC,ICC/ANSI A 117.1-98 and MI Michigar X06 X06 L X06 X09 L X06 X03 L X06 L the 2003 IECC.Enforcement of the Michigan codes is mandatory statewide for all buildings including 1 and 2 family dwellings.Michigan has adopted the'09 IPC which will be .1i.in Auoust 21 MN Minnesota X06 X06 X06 X00 X06 L MSBCC adopted the''06IBC,IRC,IFC,IMC,IPC,and IFGC in 2008.Effective immediately;jurisdictions adopting codes MS Mississippi X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 L X06 L L L L for the first time orjurisdictions who are updating their adoptions must adopt these codes.Jurisdictions that have codes adopted must update to these codes by July 2010. MO Missouri X00 X00 L X00 X00,X03 L X00 X06 L L L L L State Office Space-03 IPC;Modular Construction-00 IBC, IRC IMC IPC,IFGC MT Montana X06 X06 L X06 X06 X09 X06 NE Nebraska X00 X00 L L L L L X03 L L L L IBC,IFC:SFM,schools,health care,state bldgs,commercial NV Nevada X06 X06 X03 L L L L X06 L X06 L bldgs for counties over 100k.IBC,IRC,IFC,IECC,IEBC NV Public Works Board state buildings NH New Hampshire X09 X09 L X09 X09 L X09 L The New Hampshire State Building Code is based on the 20091-codes. NJ New Jersey X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 L O6 IBC,IRC,IECC 8 IEBC adopted statewide by NM Const Ind Div.03 IFC adopted statewide by the State Fire Marshal's NM New Mexico X06 X06 X03 L X06 X06 Office.NM uses the 2006 NM Codes which are based on the 20061-codes and amendments. They can be accessed at http.,IAvww.rid.state.nm.uskidlrules-and-law.htm NY New York X03 X03 X03 X03 X03 X03 X03 X03 X03 The 2007 Code of New York State is based on the 20031- codes. NC North Carolina X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 All codes contain NC specific amendments. The 2009 NC codes are based on the 20061-code; ND North Dakota I X06 X06 L X06 L X06 I L L International Codes-Adoption by State (Updated 07-01-2010) ICC makes every effort to provide current,accurate code adoption information.Not all jurisdictions notify ICC of code adoptions. To obtain more detailed information on amendments and changes to adopted codes,please contact the jurisdiction.To submit code adoption information:www.iccsafe.org/adoptions X=Effective Statewide A=Adopted,but may not yet be effective L=Adopted by Loral Governments PV1*=Public Version 1.0 S=Supplement 09=2009 Edition 06=2006 Edition 04=2004 Edition 03=2003 Edition 00=2000 Edition ST Jurisdiction IBC $ IMC IPC IPSDC IFGC IGCC IECC IPMC IEBC ICCPC IUWIC RC ICC 7D Chart Comments For commercial buildings the State of Ohio has,with amendments,adopted statewide the 2006 editions of IBC, IMC,IPC and IFC,and by reference,the ICC/ANSI A117.1- 2004 and the 2006 edition of the IFGC.The 2006 IECC for commercial buildings has been adopted with a prescriptive OH Ohic X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 L I_ package.The 2006 IRC with amendments has been adopted statewide for 1,2 and 3 family dwellings.Enforcement of the Ohio Building Codes is mandatory statewide for all buildings except 1,2 and three family dwellings.The Residential Cade of Ohio(RCO)is required statewide for jurisdictions that enforce a building code for 1,2 and/or 3 family dwellings. OK Oklahoma X06 X09 X06 X09 X09 L X09 X03 X06 X06 X06 L L IRC-Mechanical Plumbing and Fuel Gas provisions only OR Oregon X09 X06 X06 X09 X09 X09 Oregon adoptions are based on the 20061-codes and the state codes be seen at the Oregon BCD website. PA Pennsylvania X09 X09 X09 X09 X09 X09 X09 L X09 X09 X09 RI Rhode Island X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 Rhode Island's custom code will be based on the 20091-codes upon it's effective date 07/01/2010. SC South Carolina X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 L06 LO6 LO6 SC currently uses the 20061-codes and amendments which can be found on the SCBCC website. SO South Dakota X03 L X03 X03 L L L L L L L IBC,IFC:Approved for local adoption;IMC for state school construction TN Tennessee X06 L X06 L L L L L L L L Jurisdictions authorized by state law to adopt later editions of TX Texas X03 X00 L L L L L X00 L L L L L IBC,IRC,IPC,IMC,IFGC,and IECC.See Jurisdiction Chart forspecific edition adopted. The Utah Uniform Building Standard Act currently uses the 20061-Codes and amendments. The 2009 codes will become effective on July 1,2010. This information can be accessed at UT Utah X09 X09 X03 X09 X09 X09 X09 L06 hffp.,Il w.dopl.utah.govlprograms/ubcl.TheUTWildland Urban Interface(UWUIC)was promulgated by the/CC with alternatives and amendments and is adopted by the local jurisdiction,along with the IEBC,IPMC and IPSDC. VT Vermont X06 L03 X03 X04 The 2006 Vermont Fire&Building Safety Code is based on the 2006 IBC. VA Virginia X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 X06 The VA Uniform Statewide Building Cade is based on the 20061-Codes. WA Washington X09 X09 X09 X09 X09 L L L 109 West Virginia,through the WV Fire Commission,has the regulatory authority to adopt the state's building and fire codes.The Commission has adopted statewide the 2009 editions of IBC,IRC,IMC,IFGC,IPC,IEBC and IPMC for any jurisdiction that chooses to enforce building codes and the'03 edition of the IECC.Although the IPMC is adopted statewide, WV West Virginia X09 X09 L X09 X09 X09 X03 X09 X09 enforcement is optional.As the Fire Code,the Fire Commission has adopted the entire collection of the NFPA codes and standards excepting NFPA 5000 and NFPA 900 and NFPA 101A.The WV Fire code applies to bath new and existing construction and whenever there is a conflict between the State Building Code(Title 87 Series 5b)and the State Fire Code(Title 87 Sanest),the fire code takes precedence. wl Wisconsin X06 L X06 X06 X06 X06 The WI Commercial Building Code includes the 2006 IBC, IEBC IFGC IECC andlMC. WY uses the 2006 IRC,IPMC and IEBC to the extent that WY Wyoming X06 X06 X06 X06 L L X06 L X06 X06 L those codes are referenced in the IBC,IFC,IMC and IFGC and contain fire and life-safef rovisions. TY U.S.Territories GU Guam X09 NMI Northern Marianas Islands X09 PR Puerto Rico X X X VI U.S.Vi in Islands X03 X03 X03 X03 c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ NB #9 II Finance ❑ EST. , � 1836 Engineer ❑ Agenda Item Tracking Number y City Administrator ■ Consultant ❑ EDC 2011-21 dal County El`E City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Dormant Zoning Applications/Petitions Meeting and Date: EDC—June 7, 2011 Synopsis: Proposed policy for dormant zoning applications/petitions and the refund of deposits. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: N/A Item Number: N/A Type of Vote Required: Discussion Council Action Requested: Direction to prepare ordinance for City Council consideration. Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memorandum. Cpl 0 Memorandum EST. 1836 To: Economic Development Committee --� From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director '{ 11 E CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator �d��o Ty •Z ��< Date: June 3, 2011 LE 1� Subject: Proposed Policy for Dismissing Dormant Zoning Applications/Petitions and Refund of Deposits Background Since the downturn in the housing market, there has been a backlog of developer petitions/applications with little to no activity for more than a year. Most of these applications have engineering and legal deposits associated with them. In total, there are approximately 30 development applications and nearly$110,000.00 in deposits. Staff has begun to identify which applications are dormant and have contacted the petitioner as to their intention to move forward with the project. We have also determined which applications with associated deposits are eligible for refund. It is important to note that the deposits are not associated with the city's general fund balance and the release of the funds will have no budgetary impact. Further, upon releasing the stagnant application deposits the city will have satisfied an audit obligation. Staff Recommendation Currently, the city does not have a policy which explicitly allows zoning applications to be dismissed in cases where the applicant has been unresponsive for an extended period of time. Therefore, staff is seeking direction from the committee to draft an ordinance that will allow the Community Development Director to dismiss any zoning application or petition submitted, if any of the circumstances exist: • The application is incomplete and the applicant has been notified of such deficiencies and has not responded or provided a timeline for completing the application within ninety (90) days from the time of notification; • The applicant has not responded in writing to a request for information or documentation from the initial Plan Council review within six (6) months from the date of the request; • The applicant has not responded to a request for legal or engineering deposit replenishment for city incurred costs and fees within ninety (90) days from the date of the request. Staff proposes that the applicant will be notified in writing by the Community Development Department of the intent to dismiss the application within thirty (30) days from the date of the written notice and all remaining legal and engineering deposits will be refunded at that the time of dismissal. Should it be the consensus of the committee to have such a policy in place regarding dormant zoning applications/petitions, staff will prepare draft ordinance language to present to the EDC at an upcoming meeting for further review. 1 ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 A o J Legal ❑ Q NB #10 111, T 11 "AM Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Agenda Item Tracking Number City Administrator ■ °°°�^o O Consultant Cea, ❑ Ke da vs—ty EDC 2011-22 <�E El City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Development Fees Report Meeting and Date: EDC—June 7, 2011 Synopsis: Research and comparison of Yorkville's and surrounding municipalities impact fees, building permit fees, land-cash donations & incentive programs for residential development. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: N/A Item Number: N/A Type of Vote Required: Discussion Council Action Requested: Direction and informational item. Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memorandum. Ciry a Memorandum J , EST. -1 1836 To: Economic Development Committee -� From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director p L Il ®&Q CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator • �d�co `•= Date: June 3, 2011 <tE � Subject: Development Fee Research Background Due to the recent economic climate faced by all levels of governments, local municipalities have been severely affected by the decline in new housing starts and foreclosures. In an effort to seek out ways to "jump start"residential development, and at the behest of several interested builders, staff has prepared the following comparison of our current schedule of fees for development related projects and those of surrounding communities to open the dialogue for feedback of potentially reducing these fees for new and existing developments to remain competitive and developer-friendly in the housing market. The fees reviewed by staff include: Building Permit Fees, Impact or Transition Fees, and Land-Cash Donations. While Building Permit Fees affect all construction within the city, Impact or Transition Fees and Land-Cash Donations potentially affect only new home development. Staff has also researched potential incentive-based programs other local municipalities are offering for residential developments for feedback and direction in negotiating new and amended annexation agreements. Building Permit Fees Last year, staff undertook a comprehensive building permit fee analysis and proposed rate revisions, increases and decreases, based upon a survey of area communities (see attached). The proposed building permit fee changes were approved by the City Council in May 2010 by way of Ordinance No. 2010-23. The approved revisions put Yorkville's permit fees at the median level based upon the other nine (9) communities surveyed. Staff is not proposing to amend the recently approved schedule of fees for building permits. However, we are open to revisiting the fees if it is the consensus of the committee. Impact Fees The City's developer impact fees are derived from costs typically associated with the cost to government and "impact" on services to be provided by the city resulting from annexation and redevelopment. Currently, the United City of Yorkville's development impact fees total approximately $10,159.00' per unit, which excludes building permit related fees but includes the following: This fee applies to new annexation only,and where an annexation agreement with a fee lock does not exist. 1 Table 1. United City of Yorkville- Development Impact Fees Public Works $700.00/unit Police $300.00/unit Municipal Building $5,509.002/unit Library $500.00/unit Bristol-Kendall Fire $1,000.003/unit Engineering Capital Fee $100.00/unit Park&Recreation Capital Fee $50.00/unit Road Contribution Fund (City Transportation) $2,000.00/unit TOTAL $10,159.00/unit In April of 2010, staff has researched surrounding municipalities to evaluate our development impact fees. Attached is a comparison chart of the estimated costs to construct a typical $250,000 square foot, 4-bedroom home in Yorkville and in five (5) surrounding communities. It is important to note that since this chart was prepared, both Plainfield and Sugar Grove passed ordinances which eliminated or drastically reduced their city capital impact fees in response to the decline in new construction building permits (refer to attached). The Village of Shorewood, Illinois located approximately 20 miles southwest of Yorkville, also reduced its development impact fees by 15% in April 2011. Among the communities staff compared: Montgomery, Oswego, Plainfield, Plano and Sugar Grove, the United City of Yorkville has one of the highest city capital/impact fee rates in the area. The chart also compares fees generated by other governmental agencies such as the county, school, library, and fire districts. Of similar interest, the following chart compares the sewer connection and infrastructure fees for area sanitary districts which also have a financial impact on new home construction. From the data gathered the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District (YBSD), which services most of Yorkville in addition to Fox Metro, has the highest single- family residential annexation fees of the surveyed sanitary districts but is mid-range in infrastructure and connection fees. Annexation Fee Infrastructure Fee Connection Fee $115.00 flat fee if contiguous Downers Grove Sanitary District $3,380.00/acre $2,712.50/du $250.00 flat fee if non-contiguous $1,853.39/acre- $1,400/du(2+du/acre) Fox Metro Water Reclamation District $1 400/acre $6,650.00/acre $1 900/du(1-2 du/acre) (includes annexation fee) $2,900/du(< 1 du/acre) Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District $4,228.00/acre $4,228.00/acre $1,400/du Fox River Water Reclamation District $2,800.00/acre ----- $2,800.00/du z Fee is effective as of 3/14/06 and paid at time of building permit.However,if the fee is paid for in its entirety during the time of the first final plat,the fee will be$3,288.00 per residential dwelling for each unit annexed,zoned and platted for residential development. 3 Fee is effective as of 111105 and applies to single-family and single-family attached(duplexes and townhomes);any multifamily structure (apartment buildings)are$500.00 per unit. 2 Land-Cash Donations The city's land-cash ordinance establishes the fair-market value for any parcel of residential land as a means of determining the per acre fee for cash-in-lieu of park land donations. Currently, Yorkville's land-cash value is $101,000 per acre for a residential development. The land-cash value has not been re-evaluated since its most recent amendment in 2006—during the height of the housing boom. A brief comparison summary of the surrounding communities land cash values is provided in table form as follows: Table 2. Land Cash Donation Ordinance of Local Municipalities Comparison Community/Agency Ordinance Year Land-Cash Value County(ies) Kendall County Forest Preserve District 2006 $110,554/acre Kendall Oswegoland Park District 2006 $110,000/acre Kendall,Will Plainfield Township Park District 1988 $139,725/acre Kendall,Will Plano 2006 $96,463.00/acre Kendall Sugar Grove 1995 $80,000/acre Kane Yorkville 2006 $101,000 1acre Kendall As indicated in the table above, Yorkville's land-cash value is within the median range as compared to other local municipalities which range between $80,000/acre on the low end and upwards to nearly $140,000/acre. As of February 2010, the Village of Plainfield was reviewing its land-cash donation fee as part of a strategic plan to re-evaluate its overall development impact fee structure. A comprehensive Land-Cash Donation Ordinance Survey of various Illinois municipalities was prepared by the Office of Recreation and Park Resources at the University of Illinois in spring 2009. A copy of that report has been attached for your information. Incentive Programs for Residential Development A couple of the surveyed municipalities in addition to reducing impact fees have also initiated incentive-based programs to stimulate residential development within their communities. They include the following: Streamlined engineering review process (Plainfield) — permit preliminary engineering at time of site plan review with final engineering required only at time of the building permit or prior to any earth work. This also lowers the developers' upfront costs of preparing costly plans and can spread the soft costs out over a longer timeframe in their budget pro forma. 3 • Permit Fee Rebate/Deferral Program (Sugar Grove) — allows for the up-front rebate of 50% (up to $5,000) of impact fees and a 100% reduction of transition fees. This program also allows for the deferral of the payment of some building permit fees from the current rate. • Rebate Program of Certain Impact Fees (Minooka) — a $100,000 Village funded program was established to rebate homebuyers to entice new home construction. For single-family homes, the homebuilder would put up $5,000 for impact fees which the Village would match. Upon closing of the home, the Village would pay the homeowner $10,000. Homebuyers of duplexes received $5,000 with the builder and Village putting up $2,500 each. Since the program's inception approximately 3 years ago, the fund had to be fully replenished by the Village Board and some larger homebuilders opted not to participate in the program. Staff is seeking input for the committee to see if there is enough interest to pursue creating an incentive program similar to those mentioned-above. I will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to discuss the information provided in this memo in greater detail. 4 COMPARISON OF VARIOUS LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES BUILDING PERMIT FEES MUNICIPALITY DECK COMM IN- ABOVE PLUMBING DETACHED TEMPORARY RESIDENTIAL PLUMBING (D) DRIVEWAY GROUND GROUND ALTERATION GARAGE PARKING PLAN INSPECTION POOL POOL TRAVEL REVIEW FEE A TRAILERS C Aurora 70 No Permit 446 (F) Inflatable 210 70 No Permit 10% 0 yes Inf. 150 Kendall County 125 125 150 100 75 100 and up No Permit 176 50 Minooka 35 245 (E) 150 100 125 (H) 275 No Permit 100 40 Montgomery 68 30 9 per 100sq' 55 205 No Permit 125 50 North Aurora 69 No Permit 28/100sq' 52 185 417 F No Permit 12%Permit Fee 95 Oswego 96 325 (E) 96 and up 96 142 (H) 230 F) No Permit 168 50 Plano 50 No Permit 50 50 (B) 51 per Drain 409 (F) No Permit 0 0 St. Charles 70 70 185 55 151.40 H 90 No Permit 125 (l) 65 Sugar Grove 89 60 + 300 55 300 243 (F) No Permit 10% Permit 35 Consultant Fee Fees Yorkville 135 90 135 90 135 180 200 100 45 (A) Includes temporary inflatable pools (B) Only 8 In-ground pool permits issued, the Code Official said they lose money on each one (C) Based on a 2,200 sq ft home (D) Deck fee based on 340 sq ft (E) Based on $22,000 Driveway (F) Based on $25,000 (G) Residential only (H) Based on $10,000 project (1) Submittal Fee -All examples assume a $250,000, 2,200 sf, 4 bedroom home Yorkville Plainfield Sugar Grove Joliet Oswego Montgomery Annexation $ - $ 2,500.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - Building Permit $ 1,754.80 $ 2,025.00 $ 550.00 $ 1,250.00 $ 3,300.00 $ 308.00 City Beautification $ - $ 250.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - City Transition $ - $ - $ 506.14 $ - $ 353.72 $ - City Transportation $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ - $ - $ 475.00 County Transportation $ 1,754.80 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,234.00 $ - Fire District Transition $ - $ - $ 497.00 $ - $ - $ - Fire District Impact $ - $ - $ 486.00 $ 1,200.00 $ - $ 300.00 City Impact/Capital $ - $ - $ 6,878.00 $ 1,600.00 $ - $ 2,100.00 Public Works $ 700.00 $ - Total, see above Total,see above Total,see above Total,see above Police $ 300.00 $ - Total, see above Total,see above Total,see above Total,see above Municipal Buildings $ 5,509.00 $ 2,000.00 Total, see above Total,see above Total,see above Total,see above Library $ 500.00 $ 284.00 Total, see above Total,see above Total,see above Total,see above Parks and Recreation $ 50.00 $ - Total, see above Total,see above Total,see above Total,see above Engineering $ 100.00 $ - Total, see above Total,see above Total,see above Total,see above Fire District $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Total, see above Total,see above Total,see above Total,see above Inspections $ 195.00 $ 175.00 $ - $ - $ 45.00 $ 50.00 Library District Transition $ - $ - $ 206.68 $ - $ - $ - Library District Impact $ - $ - $ 212.00 $ - $ 707.11 $ 292.00 Life Safety- Police $ - $ - $ 200.00 $ - $ - $ - Life Safety- Fire $ - $ - $ 200.00 $ - $ - $ - School Facilities $ - $ - $ - $ 4,826.00 $ - $ School Impact $ - $ 4,826.00 $ 4,063.95 $ - $ 2,672.00 $ - School Land Cash $ 4,780.48 $ 3,926.00 $ 3,523.00 $ 2,238.00 $ 4,100.00 $ 2,430.00 School Transition $ 3,000.00 $ - $ 2,814.00 $ 821.00 $ 1,642.00 $ 3,000.00 Township Transition $ - $ - $ 77.00 $ - $ - $ - Transition Fee $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,323.00 $ - Water Connection $ 3,700.00 $ 3,110.00 $ 4,637.50 $ 3,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,000.00 Water Meter $ 250.00 $ 360.00 $ 354.00 $ 250.00 $ 4,638.00 Weather Warning Siren $75/acre $ - $ 25.00 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 25,594.08 $ 22,456.00 $ 26,230.27 $ 15,685.00 $ 26,014.83 $ 10,955.00 Michael P. Collins PRESIDENT Michelle Gibas VILLAGE CLERK TRUSTEES Margie Bonuchi Paul Fay Larry Kachel Bill Lamb Garrett M. Peck Press Release James Racich March 2, 2010 For Immediate Publication: Plainfield Village Board Votes To Eliminate Impact Fees Plainfield, IL -- To help spur economic development, the Village Board approved a resolution eliminating all Village impact fees for residential and commercial development on March l" Effective immediately, the annexation, municipal, traffic, and beautification impact fees have been eliminated, saving builders and in turn, homeowners an average of$7,000 per home while commercial developers will save an average pf over $4000. The Village's goal in eliminating these fees is to make homes more affordable and to encourage commercial development. To further .assist developers, the Village will allow permit and impact fees to be paid at the time of occupancy rather than prior to construction. This flexibility in timing payments allows builders to proceed with a development during challenging economic times. Furthermore, builders will be charged a fixed engineering fee rather than the hourly rate previously charged. This eliminates uncertainty for the developers as they budget for and then construct their development. All of these measures are part of the Village's new Strategic Business Plan which has been in development for the last several months. The Village Board has taken a proactive stance in regards to economic development and as part of the Business Plan, the Village has been working with the development community to discuss ways to encourage both residential and commercial development. As Mayor Collins explained at a recent meeting, "The Village has been working to position itself for economic recovery. We want to be ready when development takes off again. Plainfield is open for business." To review a copy of the Village's Business Plan, visit the Village's web site,www.plainfield-il.org. For additional information,please contact: Michael Garrigan Village Planner (815)439-2825 24401 W.Lockport Street Plainfield,IL 60544 Phone(815)436-7093 Fax(815)436-1950 Web www.plainfield-d.org Village of Sugar Grove a Residential Permit Fee Rebate Program The Village of Sugar Grove recognizes that due to the current difficult economic condition, the residential housing development industry has been adversely affected. In an attempt to assist the industry the Village is offering a short-term fee permit and fee rebate program. This program is limited to the first thirty-five (35) permits applied for by October 29, 2010. Additionally a certificate of occupancy for the permit applied for must be issued by October 31, 2011 to qualify for the program. The program provides an up-front rebate of 50% (up to $5,000) of impact fees and a 100% reduction of transition fees. The program also allows for the deferral of the payment of some fees from the current requirement of paying at building permit issuance to payment upon receipt of the certificate of occupancy. Rebates and deferrals are limited to those as specified in the specific annexation agreement, development agreement, Planned Unit Development Ordinance, and/or similar documents that govern the applicable subdivision in which the home is to be built. The Village of Sugar Grove firmly believes that programs and projects that stimulate development stimulate the local economy. We hope that you will take advantage of this program and join us in our effort to enhance our community. For additional information or to obtain a copy of the program as passed by the Village Board please contact Community Development at 630-466-8954. Land-Cash Donation Ordinance Survey Summary-Report of Findings Spring 2009 �..yfq rc/`i y h Prepared by: Office of Recreation and Park Resources Dina Izenstark and Robin Hall TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ....................................................................................3 METHODOLOGY ..............................................................................................................6 RESULTS............................................................................................................................7 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................25 APPENDIX........................................................................................................................26 2 INTRODUCTION The Office of Recreation and Park Resources (ORPR) at the University of Illinois conducted a survey on Land Dedication Ordinances in order to update the previous study conducted in June 2003 by Dr. Ted Flickinger and John Comerio for the Illinois Association of Park Districts. The purpose of the survey was to gain up-to-date information that would help assist agencies, communities and counties that are considering an ordinance gain valuable knowledge based on the experiences shared by the respondents as well as assist agencies with an adopted land cash donation ordinance to better understand how their ordinance compares to others. This report is broken up into two sections. The first section is background information that discusses the importance of Land Dedication Ordinances and provides a history of how they have developed. The second section describes the survey we conducted including the data collection, analysis, and discussions/conclusions. We truly appreciate all of the feedback and information that agencies provided us in order to make this report. If you have any question, comments, or suggestions please contact Robin Hall or Dina Izenstark at the ORPR. The contact information is listed below. Office of Recreation and Park Resources 104 Huff Hall 1206 S. Fourth St. Champaign, IL 61820 217/333-4410 http://www.orpr.uiuc.edu/ 3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION "City parks and open spaces improve our physical and psychological health, strengthen our communities, and make our cities and neighborhoods more attractive to live and work" (Sherer, 2003,p.6). Research has illustrated that parks and open spaces provide a number of benefits to community members both directly and indirectly. Recent studies have found park use directly benefits individuals psychologically, socially, and physically as it decreased stress, fostered social interaction and increased physical activity(Bedimo-Rung et al., 2005; Godbey et al., 1998; Kweon, 1998). In addition, parks indirectly improved individuals quality of life through the numerous environmental benefits provided to an area including reduced noise pollution, regulated microclimate, and improved air quality(Bolund& Hunhammar, 1999). As open land continues to be developed it is increasingly important to preserve and protect open spaces in the community. In order to maintain the high quality of life that parks and open spaces provide for present and future residents without raising taxes, cities can enact a Land Cash Donation Ordinance (also know as Land Dedication Ordinance)which allows communities to preserve open space for public parks and schools (Bernard&Nance, 1996). A Land Cash Donation Ordinance is a law enacted by a municipal body (that could state), "...any developer building within the city limits or 1.5 miles of the city line and seeking to annex to the city, as a condition of being granted zoning approval, had to dedicate land(in amounts to be determined by formula) to the school district and to the park district for new school sites and parks (Bernard&Nance, 1996,p.1)". The first agency to establish a land-cash donation ordinance was the Naperville Park District in 1972. In 2008, 95 agencies reported having adopted a land-cash donation ordinance within their community or county in the state of Illinois (Flickinger& Comerio, 2003; Hall, Huang, & Izenstark, 2008). Land-cash donation ordinances provide life long benefits to a community as many agencies have reported their value in developing parks, meeting the needs of the community,providing resources for capital improvements, and much more (Flickinger& Comerio, 2003). The amount of land that the developer donates is dependent upon terms set forth in the ordinance adopted by the city. The National Recreation and Park Association recommend that 10 acres of land is donated per 1,000 residents (Monson, 2006). In the cases in which it is impossible for the developer to donate land they are required to provide cash in lieu of land. The net worth of land is different among each town and city. However, in 2008 the Office of Recreation and Park Resources and IDNR conducted a survey and found 95 agencies adopted a Land-Cash Donation Ordinance and of the agencies that had a required amount of land developers were required to donate, 35% of agencies required 10 acres, 19% of agencies required 5.5 acres, and six agencies required 15 acres to be donated per 1000 residents in the population. Additionally, the average amount of dollars developers donated varied greatly from community to community and within different regions of the state. Please see attached appendix in order to get a better idea of the number of acres per dollar amount that land-cash donation ordinances 4 required developers to provide agencies (Flickinger& Comerio, 2003; Hall, Huang, & Izenstark, 2008). Agencies that have adopted a land-cash donation ordinance have provided many suggestions to other agencies considering adopting an ordinance. Some of the most common suggestions include: 1) land values should be regularly updated to ensure adequate funds are supplied to help meet parks and recreation demands of the community, 2) active use land is only acceptable which does not account for detention/retention land for credit, and 3)that park agency officials should be involved with the city in the planning process. One example, of a county taking advantage of these suggestions is in Kendall County. In 2001, Kendall County updated their counties land-cash ordinance from $45,000 per acre to $98,000 per acre (Scott, 2005). This means, if a developer wants to contribute cash to a taxing body instead of donating land they are required to contribute $98,000 per acre. Additionally, their previous ordinance required that developers donate "high and dry" land or land that isn't considered floodplain or wetlands, so the district can use it as park or forest preserve land. The new ordinance does not consider land in a flood plain worthy as a creditable land donation unless the district deems it valuable to them for some future project, such as a trail system(Scott, 2005, p.1). Overall, these findings clearly illustrate the importance of land-cash donation ordinances in preserving the quality of life in the community for a number of park and recreation agencies. 5 METHODOLOGY In Spring 2009, the Office of Recreation and Park Resources conducted a survey of 98 selected agencies that had previously indicated the adoption of a land dedication ordinance based on records from the IAPD. Using survey monkey, 98 agencies received an e-mail asking them to participate in the Land Dedication Ordinance survey on-line. Initially 41 agencies had responded to the survey. A follow-up e-mail was sent to all participants who had not yet responded resulting in 17 more agencies that participated in the survey. There were a total of 58 agencies that participated in the survey resulting in a 59%response rate. A complete list of the 58 agencies that had participated in the survey is included in the Appendix along with an updated chart of the 98 selected agencies that had previously indicated from past surveys the adoption of a Land Dedication Ordinance. A copy of the questionnaire is attached to the next page followed by an analysis of each survey question based on participant's results. 6 SURVEY Please take a few moments to answer the following questions; your input is most appreciated. 1. Does your agency still have a Land-Cash Donation Ordinance currently in place? la. If Yes, what year was it enacted? When was the last time it was updated?What was the result of the update? 2. Based on the ordinance, what acreage amount are developers required to donate per 1000 residents? 3. What is the total acreage of land your agency has accumulated as a direct result of this policy? 4. Based on the ordinance, what dollar amount are developers required to donate in lieu of an acre of land? 5. Does your agency figure the cost of land or the cost of land plus improvements in calculating the dollar amount for cash in lieu of? 6. Is your ordinance geared toward neighborhood parks, community or regional parks? 7. Do you have any trouble receiving city money or cooperation? 8. Please identify any limitations or conditions of the ordinance that impact your agency? 9. Do you have any suggestions for agencies considering a land-cash donation ordinance? 10. Please explain the value and benefits of the land-cash donation ordinance to your agency. 11. Would you like us to e-mail you a copy of the final report? 12. If you have a copy of your ordinance or any other supplemental information that you believe will assist us or other agencies please e-mail us a copy at rrhallgillinois.edu or send it to: ORPR-University of Illinois 104 Huff Hall 1206 S. Fourth St. Champaign, IL 61820 7 RESULTS OF THE SURVEY Question 1. Does your agency still have a Land-Cash Donation Ordinance currently in place? Fifty-eight organizations (59%response rate)responded to the survey indicating that their agency still had an active land dedication ordinance in their community. Question Ia. If Yes,what year was it enacted? When was the last time it was updated? What was the result of the update? Thirty-five organizations (61%) indicated when the land dedication was enacted while Sixty- three percent of the sample (n=36 agencies) indicated the last time the ordinance was updated. Results of the update entailed an increase in acreage, value of an acre of land, and/or an adjustment of fees. See below for respondent's responses. Increase in Money for Development Increase in the fair market value of land for determining contributions in lieu of park land dedications from $205,000 (from 2004 revision)to $239,000 and to maintain the estimated cost of subdivision improvements per acre at$45,000 for a combined total of $284,000 An increase to the amount... Adjustment on the fee An increase from$234,400 per acre to $323,600 per acre Increased to $100,000 per acre, from $75,000 To adjust land prices to market levels An increase of 6% in the value of an acre of land to a total of$87,000 per acre In 2008, the cash in lieu of land requirement was increased from 185,000 to 240,500 an acre for land located in the city. Outside the city, it is 175,000 per acre Adjusted the cash value if cash in lieu of land Increase "fair market value" of land Increase of cash donation amount by $20,000 per acre but none of it is passed on the Park District. It is kept by the village Donation is based on price land sold for As a result of community being mostly built-out, land in lieu of was eliminated in favor of a process that better considered property in subdivisions. Now, cash only and dollar amounts were updated to per unit vs. per acre and revised to reflect current building trends (i.e., town homes, multi-family units) An increase in the value of an acre of land More specific guidelines and cost per acre 8 Results of Agencies most recent Land Dedication Ordinance Updates (Continued) Increase in Land and Amount of Money per Acre Additional funds per size of the development Increased acreage and cash contributions Increase in cash value for land in lieu of land Increase in the amount of land to be donated more controls on what District would accept, or expect with the donation Increased dollar per acre and land donation per person Change in acreage requirement, update per acre $$ in lieu of amount,per acre initial improvements fee and population density table Re-assessment of Land Values 10 acres per 1,000 residents with a cash value of$110,000 per acre Increase in the value per acre, increase in numbers of acres/1000 population as well as the inclusion of several other conditional requirements the developer is obligated to follow Increase in fees and acreage Increased acre value Increase to acreage and land value 9 2. Based on the ordinance, what acreage amount are developers required to donate per 1000 residents? Thirty-nine agencies (67.4%)responded to this question and three of those responses were invalid. The majority of the sample indicated the required acreage was 10 acres per 1000 residents (17 agencies; 43.5%) or 15 acres per 1000 residents (5 agencies; 12.8%)per 1000 residents. Figure 1 indicates the respondents supplied acreage amounts from the survey. Figure 1. Sample Results of Acreage Amount Developers are Required to Donate per 1000 Residents v—_ 38 15 acres 13% Other 34% ❑ 15 acres ❑10 acres ❑5.5 acres ❑Other 5.5 acres 10 acres 45% 8% From the population of agencies that have land dedication ordinances according to IAPD records (n=98), the majority of agencies reported 10 acres per 1000 residents (40 agencies; 40%). Eleven out of the 99 agencies results were considered invalid due to outliers and/or results that were not available. Figure 2 indicates respondents supplied acreage amounts from all agencies that have reported having a Land Dedication Ordinance according to IAPD records. 10 Figure 2. Population Results Developers are Required to Donate per 1000 Residents N=99 15 acres Invalid Results 6% 12% Other(7-15 acres) 15% Other(1-6.5 10 acres acres) 42% 9% 5-5.5 acres 16% 3. What is the total acreage of land your agency has accumulated as a direct result of this policy? Of the 36 respondents (62%)that answered this question there was a wide range of responses. 13 respondents indicated they did not know the total acreage of land that had been accumulated as a direct result of the Land Dedication Ordinance. The lowest number of acres that was accrued was .65 (Pleasant Dale Park District) while the highest number of areas accrued was 1,048 (Naperville Park District). A relationship between length of time since Land Dedication was enacted and number of acres accrued appeared to exist among many agencies. Please see Table 2 in the Appendix for exact figures among each agency. 4. Based on the ordinance,what dollar amount are developers required to donate in lieu of an acre of land? The dollar amount developers are required to donate in lieu of an acre of land severely differed among the agencies. Thirty-six respondents (62%) answered the question with a range of dollar amounts from$20,000 to $323,600. See Table 1 for exact figures among each agency. The answers to questions 1-4 from respondents are located in Table 1 on the next page. This chart illustrates the 99 agencies that had previously or currently indicated they had a land- dedication ordinance along with the year it was enacted, the year the ordinance was updated, the acreage amount developers are required to donate per 1000 residents, the dollar amount 11 developers are required to donate in lieu of an acre of land, and the total acreage of land the agency has accumulated as a direct result of their Land Dedication Ordinance. 12 Table 1. Communi A encies with a Land Dedication Ordinance Agency Year Enacted Year Updated Acres Dollars Population County # Served 1 Arlington Heights Park District 1982 n/a 10 165,000 78000 Cook Aurora,Community Development(City) 1969(Last update n/a 10 71,608 175,952 Kane,DuPage, 2 4/2008) Kendall,Will Bartlett Park District 1976 n/a 10 250,000 41000 Cook,Dupage, 3 Kane Batavia Park District 1971 2000 10 100,000 27000 Kane 4 5 Beecher(Village) 1999 n/a 5 60,000 4108 Will Belvidere Park District 1989 2007 6.5 84,313 in County 32000 Boone 6 120,000 in City 7 Bloomingdale Park District 1994 No update 5.5 65,000/acre 24000 DuPage Bloomington Parks and Recreation 1987 n/a 10 Acres Market Value 75000 McLean 8 Department Bolingbrook Park District 1970s 2004 10 $160000 Total of which 71000 Will only$70,000 is given to the park district 9 Boone County Conservation District Originally in the n/a It varies This also varies depending 41786 Boone late 1980's by the on which entity's County ordinance is in place 10 11 Buffalo Grove Park District 1981 n/a 10 175,000 43700 Lake, Cook 12 Butterfield Park District 2006 n/a 5.5 350,000 10000 DuPage 13 Byron Park District 2001 2007 5 84,000 10000 Ogle 14 Carol Stream Park District 1980's n/a 4 125,000 47000 DuPage 15 Cary Park District Prior to 1994 n/a 10 150000 26252 McHenry 16 Channahon Park District March 2005 n/a 9 50000 17000 Will 17 Crete Park District 1991 n/a 5.5 n/a 7200 Will 18 Crystal Lake Park District Revised in 2005 n/a 10 135,000 58000 McHenry 19 Deerfield Park District 1993 Hasn't been 15 175,000 18500 Lake,Cook 20 Deer Park(Village) 2003 n/a 10 98,000 3100 Lake,Cook DeKalb County Forest Preserve District 2006 n/a 10 Present Land Prices 100,000 DeKalb 21 8,00012,000/acre 22 DeKalb Park District 2000 2007 11.5 100,000 45000 DeKalb 23 Downers Grove Park District 1975 n/a 10 110000 50000 DuPage 13 Table 1. Communi A encies with a Land Dedication Ordinance Agency Year Enacted Year Updated Acres Dollars Population County # Served Dundee Township Park District Unclear original 2007 10 110,000 53200 Kane date but prior to 24 1992 Edwardsville Parks and Recreation 2000 n/a 10%Of land for 12,500 25000 Madison Department green space must be included new 25 developments Elgin Parks and Recreation Department 1998 Value of an acre 10 87,000 104000 Kane of land updated 26 each year Elmhurst Park District 1993 2006 10.62 1,250 single family; 1,000 44000 DuPage town home;900 multi- 27 family Fox Valley Park District 1972-Aurora n/a 10 103000 220000 Kane,DuPage, 28 Kendall,Will 29 Frankfort Park District 2006 Revised n/a 10 130,000 16500 Will 30 Frankfort Square Park District 1997 2006 10 80,000 17000 Will 31 Genoa Township Park District 2003 n/a 10 105,000 7000 DeKalb 32 Glen Ellyn Park District 1979 2007 5.5 300,000 34000 DuPage Glendale Heights Park and Recreation 1959 1996 10 75,000 32400 DuPage 33 Department Glenview Park District Pre-1990 n/a 1 acre per 10,000 $40K per acre(The Glen) 57179 Cook &$400K per acre(all other locations) 34 35 Grayslake Community Park District 1991 2005 15 100,000 23000 Lake 36 Gurnee Park District 1979 n/a 10 100000 34170 Lake 37 Hanover Park Park District 1982 2004 10 Value of project land 32600 Cook,DuPage Highland Park,Park District of 12/9/03 n/a N/A N/A;Land contributions 31365 Lake Intergovernmental in lieu of development Impact Fee impact fee option 38 Agreement Hinsdale Park and Recreation Department 1999 2004 15 Cash equal to fair market 18000 DuPage,Cook value of the 15 acres plus 39 fees Homer Glen(Village) Adopted in 2001; n/a 11 acres/thousand 100,000/acre 25000 Will 40 amended in 2006 14 Table 1. Communi A encies with a Land Dedication Ordinance Agency Year Enacted Year Updated Acres Dollars Population County # Served 41 Homewood-Flossmoor Park District 1998 n/a 1 n/a 30000 Cook 42 Illiopolis Township 7/1/1981 n/a n/a 120 982 Sangamon 43 Itasca Park District n/a n/a 0.1 2,00,000 9200 Dupage Joliet Park District 1998 n/a 7.5 for every 333 86,586 Will 44 lots/units 145,000 Kane County Forest Preserve District 05/10/1994 n/a 10.00(1.25/school Based on"fair market 450000 Kane park; 1.00 value"-$80,000 per acre neighborhood park; 1.25 district-wide or play field;2.00 community-wide recreation park; and,4.50 County- wide forest 45 reserve 46 Kendall County Forest Preserve District 1978 2006 10 110,554 96818 Kendall 47 Lake Bluff Park District Revised 2004 n/a 10 540,000 8000 Lake Lake Forest Parks&Recreation Unknown n/a 39588 15,668 per dwelling unit 20681 Lake 48 Department Lake in the Hills Parks&Recreation n/a n/a 10 n/a 29195 McHenry 49 Department Lake Villa(Village) Updated n/a 15 80,000 8602 Lake 50 10/23/2002 Lake Zurich Park and Recreation n/a 2005 15 Varies per unit size 18500 Lake Department Attached and Detached Single family/low and high density apts) 51 Lan-Oak Park District n/a n/a 5 Fair market of the 27000 Cook unimproved gross average 52 Lemont Park District 1995 2007 10 150,000 18700 Cook,DuPage, 53 Will 54 Lindenhurst Park District 1993 n/a 10 110000 15000 Lake 55 Lisle Park District 1999 n/a 5.5 varies 32000 DuPage Lockport Township Park District n/a 2004 10 Depends on school district 70000 Will that property is in. Ranges from$32,000 per 56 acre to$125,000 per acre 15 Table 1. Communi A encies with a Land Dedication Ordinance Agency Year Enacted Year Updated Acres Dollars Population County # Served 57 Manhattan Park District 2001 n/a 10.89 70000 9500 Will 58 Manteno(Village) 2005 n/a 8.8 40000 8200 Kankakee Matteson Parks and Recreation n/a n/a n/a n/a 17000 Cook 59 Department McHenry Parks and Recreation 1970 Original; n/a 15 107,586 24493 McHenry 60 Department 2007 revision Medinah Park District We operate within n/a all 3 are 5.5 Varies among 9300 DuPage 61 3 jurisdictions jurisdictions 62 Morton Grove Park District 1988 n/a 10 n/a 23000 Cook 63 Mount Prospect Park District Unknown n/a 9.16 3257(17,000,000/522) 57000 Cook Mundelein Park and Recreation District Unknown n/a *** $1,500 per n/a 36000 Lake 64 resident 65 Naperville Park District 1972 2007 8.6 323,600 142000 Dupage,Will 66 New Lenox Community Park District 1997-1998 n/a 1000 110000 58000 Will Normal Parks and Recreation Department 1975 n/a 10 acres 45,000;Depends on 50519 McLean 67 Development 68 Northbrook Park District 1998 n/a 5 $500000 32000 Cook Oakbrook Terrace Park District 1997 Hasn't been 5.5 125000+$31000(cost of 3000 DuPage 69 improvement) O'Fallon Parks and Recreation 2003 2007 6 1002 per lot 26000 St. Clair 70 Department Orland Park Recreation and Parks 1991 1996 Fair market 7 134,689 60000 Cook Department value and in 2008 for code 71 section Oswegoland Park District 1990 n/a 10 118,976 increasing 4% 35000 Kendall,Will 72 each Jan. 1 73 Ottawa Recreation Department 2006 n/a n/a n/a 18500 La Salle Palatine Park District 1977 2006 9.18 not including 135,000 83000 Cook 74 school acres Park Forest Recreation and Parks 1976 2005 10 30,000 for land plus 23462 Cook/Will Department 10,000 for initial 75 improvement Peoria Park District(Pleasure Driveway& 1972 n/a 1 $56/42/35 per 135000 Peoria Park District) single/attached/departmetn 76 77 Plainfield Township Park District 1988 n/a 10 139725 110000 Will,Kendall 16 Table 1. Communi A encies with a Land Dedication Ordinance Agency Year Enacted Year Updated Acres Dollars Population County # Served Pleasant Dale Park District 1985(with Burr 2005 5.5 Ridge only) $239,000 + cost of subdivision improvements per acre at$45,000 for a combined total of 78 $284,000 79 Rolling Meadows Park District n/a n/a n/a n/a 26000 Cook 80 Romeoville Recreation Department 1995 2004 10 70000 37000 Will 81 Roscoe(Village) 1992 n/a 7 93,997 9652 Winnebago Roselle Park District May-05 n/a 5.5 No less than 23000 DuPage 82 $175,000/Acre 83 Round Lake Area Park District 2003 n/a 15 80000 50000 Lake Saint Charles Park District 1989 2008 10 240,500 and 175,000 for 46000 Kane 84 outside the city Schaumburg Park District Village Of n/a n/a $150 to$300 per unit 76000 Cook Schaumbrug 85 Ordinance South Elgin Parks&Recreation 1997 1999 10.5 20,000 22000 Kane 86 Department 87 Spring Grove(Village) n/a n/a N/A 30,000 4978 McHenry 88 Streamwood Park District n/a n/a 10A/1000 83,000.00/A 36500 Cook 89 Streator(City) 2006 n/a 5.5 34,800 14200 La Salle 90 Sugar Grove Park District 1995 n/a 10 80,000 11000 Kane Sycamore Park District 1995 2008 11.5 community 122000 14900 Dekalb Park 1.5 91 neighborhood Park 92 Vernon Hills Park District 1980's n/a 10 190,000 24000 Lake Warrenville Park District n/a 2006 10 261000 14000 DuPage 93 Wauconda Park District Recently updated n/a 15 100000 13000 Lake 94 in 2006 95 Waukegan Park District 1989 n/a 10 n/a 93500 Lake 96 West Chicago Park District 1995 n/a 10 230,000 33000 DuPage 97 Westmont Park District 1999 updated n/a 4 125,000 25000 DuPage 98 Wheaton Park District 2001 n/a 5.5 150000 61500 DuPage Yorkville Parks and Recreation 1996 n/a 10 102000 16000 Kendall 99 Department 17 Question 5. Does your agency figure the cost of land or the cost of land plus improvements in calculating the dollar amount for cash in lieu of? Thirty-five agencies (60.3%)responded to this question. Eighteen indicated the agency figures only the cost of land in calculating the dollar amount for cash in lieu of while seven agencies indicated they calculate the cost of land plus improvements. Nine agencies indicated that it was not up to the agency but determined by the City, village, or the school district while four respondents indicated no response available. Figure 3. Calculation of the Dollar Amount for Cash in Lieu of? Other 24% Cost of Land 49% None 8% Cost of Land Plus Improvements 19% Additional Comments From the agreement, "The cash contribution in-lieu-of-land shall be based on the "fair market value" of the acres of land in the development. It has been determined that the present"fair market value" of such improved land in and surrounding the Village is ..." Land—we have a Real estate transfer Tax that helps in development of the park space Park Districts have no legal authority to assess impact fees such as these. The authority comes from the municipality. Therefore our village sets the cash equivalent. It's based on the cost per acre Fair market value of an acre of land in the area improved Cost of land only for this figure. Another fee is charged for park development Through annexation agreements we also require a capital impact fee to assist with development costs Land only, but cash can be used for improvements if a neighborhood park already exists It is a Village Ordinance and they negotiate with developers on our behalf No. Ordinance only provides for acquisition, not development No, it is calculated by the City of Oakbrook Terrace Villages determine this. One village does both Calculated by the school district 18 Question 6. Is your ordinance geared toward neighborhood parks, community or regional parks? Of the 36 respondents who answered this question 72% (n=26) indicated their ordinance was geared toward both neighborhood and community parks. Twenty-two percent (n=8) reported the ordinance was geared toward only neighborhood parks. Five percent (n=2) indicated the ordinance was not geared toward parks but instead the organization was given cash donations for redevelopment because the community itself was mostly built out. Figure 4. Land Dedication Ordinances Utilization Towards Parks Neighborhood Cash El Both Neighborhood and Parks 6 nation Community Parks 21% ■Neighborhood Parks ❑Cash Donation Both Neighborhood and Community Parks 73% 19 Question 7. Do you have any trouble receiving city money or cooperation? Of the 36 respondents who answered this question the majority indicated they had no trouble with receiving city money or cooperation(77%, n=28). The most common reasons for not having any trouble receiving city money or cooperation was because the organization was part of the city or village as a Parks and Recreation Department. Among the organizations that did have trouble reasons that were stated included: On occasion. We would have liked it reviewed and updated more often The first writing of the ordinance was a very long process that lasted over two years but updates have been very easy The ordinance does not provide an adequate amount of funding for land acquisition It was never received until the ordinance was enacted. We lost out on many land/cash opportunities Some times the villages are so accommodating to the developer that full donation in land, which must be high and dry, is not always an option We only collect fees and land donations for new development within the unincorporated areas of the County. Each municipality has its own donations requirements and not all of our communities have park districts. The cities do not collect on our behalf The money is received from the developer. The city will not issue permits until proof of payment is presented We cover three municipalities, each is different. One municipality has a recreation department that receives the donation negating the Park District from receiving anything. Another will not pass a land/cash ordinance. The third is very cooperative City before 2006 took all the land cash funds for city parks. Now the funds and land are to go to park district. We are pretty much land locked now though They believe it is their money and they can give it or keep it based on their needs in a particular area No. Developer donations come to the Park District after the development is totally completed. 20 Question 8. Please identify any limitations or conditions of the ordinance that impact your agency? A total of 33 agencies (56%response rate) answered this question. Seven indicated that they did not have any limitations to identify. The limitations of 25 agencies that had responses are listed below and vary across a number of different issues mainly relating to not having full control over spending the money in relation to where they have determined the greatest need for the money. Appropriation of Money All funds must be spent on capital outdoor improvement in the Village of Burr Ridge within 3 years of when we receive it. Since our district encompasses multiple cities, if we need the money for a park outside the Village boundaries, we have to petition to use it there The village doesn't pass along the full amount of cash collected. They keep the lions share The Village has a provision that they can put 1/3 of the money in an open space and wetland maintenance fund it they so determine the need The Village negotiates on our behalf as well as the other taxing bodies The city and or county enforce it at their discretion Villages have the final say on what we will get. For the most part they listen to us,but they still want the development All funds go to City. We must ask them in writing and state what project will be funded. City administrator approves We do not control it Issues with Ordinance Limitations are dictated by village ordinance Be sure to update the ordinance regularly. It is easy to fall behind on land values Part of our park district is located in an unincorporated area of Oakbrook Terrace. If the development is with the city limits, our ordinance requires us to purchase land within the city limits rather than in an unincorporated area Ordinance does not provide an adequate amount of funding to provide present or future open space/park/recreation space Age restricted communities are not clearly identified in the ordinance. Credit for private open space is not clearly defined. We have spent a large amount of money in legal fees related to these two issues Issues with Value of Land and/or Money Received Open space is not the problem. Development and improvements are difficult Value not keeping pace with inflation The Park District does not believe the village dollar amount fairly reflects the price of an 21 They can receive up to 50% credit for providing open space or neighborhood owned park to the neighborhood. It's usually small space that is not used much by residents Quality and location of land donations Our community is very built up, and very few opportunities for further development exist Additional Limitations Assisted Living If the land/development is already annexed, and there is a repurposing to residential we do not see any donation. We are impacted by population,but do not get land/resources to service this population We are largely land locked and relatively land rich, so receive mostly cash for small and infill development Parks and Recreation department is a part of the Village acre of ground in Palatine. Some parcels in Palatine are now priced at $750,000 per acre The ordinance does not really have a benefit to my agency as we do not receive the benefit from the ordinance. The Forest Preserve District and School Districts are the primary beneficiaries. In some select instances a Park District might benefit, but more times than not the open space components goes to the county Forest Preserve District. Any limitations would affect the benefiting district and not my department. The use of the funds is limited to the purchase of land and or the construction of facilities (buildings, additions, on site improvements)that directly benefit the school (or open space areas and parks) that service the population within the subdivisions from which the funds were generated. Under the statutes governing their use, if the funds are not expended within ten years from the date on which they were paid or collected, the districts must return them It is actually a City Ordinance adopted on behalf of the Park District. We have no limitations now, however could realize some if relations between the City and Park District were to sour. Not being updated on a regular basis is a limitation, and we are basically a land-locked community. 22 Question 9. Do you have any suggestions for agencies considering a land-cash donation ordinance to your agency? Thirty-one agencies (53.4%) offered suggestions for agencies who are considering adopting a land-cash donation ordinance. Most advice pertained to maintaining a relationship with municipal officials, finance, and/or land. Relationship with Municipal Officials Make sure you have a good working arrangement with the city/village. Everyone must work together or it won't work well The city officials need to see a value for open space. With the economy, many are willing to be more forgiving in order to cater to developers Work with your City/village, get as much as you can but make it reasonable for the developer so they do not have disincentive doing business. In land locked communities get cash. Do not take unwanted land as it likely has a problem for future development. Try to be included as early in the planning process as possible and give the Planning Commission and City Council and County Board members copies of your Park Master Plan and Land Acquisition Plans Work with village/city in regards to notifying developer of cash in lieu ordinance as well as collecting developer contributions Yes, survey other surrounding districts. Get involved with the village and the developer during the initial planning process Educate elected officials that create the ordinance on how this will benefit their community Work very closely with your city when developing the ordinance and recruit their assistance and commitment to the tenants of the ordinance. Financial Advice Take part land and part cash for development if funding is an issue Make it as expensive as it would be allowed by your Board If you need the land, get it. If not take the money to maintain the parks existing Such an ordinance is a great tool for any Park and Recreation Dept. Allows capital money to go towards development rather than just acquisition Make sure you conduct population generation studies and an analysis of land costs and acreage requirements of the benefiting districts so that the population/acreage ratios correlate directly to the impacts you are trying to offset Develop a good relationship with your city council and city staff. GO for at least $ 261,000 per acre Land Advice Do not include the value of wetlands or storm water management areas in your valuations. Don't accept the developer's wasteland as your open space donation Make sure it specifies the quality of land to be donated, no credit for wetlands I would recommend getting 10 acres per 1,000 23 Develop a park plan to guide development 2. Review ordinance periodically Make sure it is set up to provide acreage/1000 and that it provides both acquisition and development funding. Also, the land provided should not be the development outlets, gullies and stream buffers (undevelopable land under your present code). If the land is undevelopable for residential development, it probably is not very good land for any park use/development either Set requirements high to start with. It's harder to amend the ordinance later Make sure you have the ability to choose land or cash. Do not accept sub-par land(i.e. detention) Make sure an accurate current land value is used and the ordinance needs to be either updated annually automatically through an agreed upon acceptable formula or at the minimum be adjusted every 5 years to reflect currently land value Additional Suggestions Remove credit for private open space from your ordinance, since it is difficult to quantify. Add demographic tables for age-restricted communities. Do it! Should have one if any potential of developments It's a must, even if you do not have a lot of development going on Do it before the growth Do your homework and be aware of any new developments early on when they are being proposed to the county or city. Green space may be incorporated within the development much easier in the early stages and prior to permitting. Too late and you end up with unusable land or cash Have something No recreation agency should be without one Make it mandatory that Park Agency controls whether cash or land and that money must be turned over within the same Quarter it is collected Do not hesitate. Get an ordinance in place and do not be shy about thinking out of the box when inserting your requests for developers. 24 Question 10. Please explain the value and benefits of the land-cash donation ordinance to your agency? Thirty-four respondents (60%)provided valuable input on what some of the major benefits of having a land-cash donation ordinance is to their agency. The responses were categorized into three sub-dimensions: land, money for development, and additional suggestions. Land The ordinance has allowed the Park District to add parks in the event of a land donation or accumulate cash for land purchases over the years. This has extended the capabilities of the District to delivery quality recreational services The ability to provide more neighborhood parks and amenities at fewer costs to the village/department It provides open space simultaneously with the development of the community Without it we would not be able to continue to provide parks and facilities to our growing community We have parks in every neighborhood that might not otherwise be there. Best way to expand parks at no cost to the taxpayer. We have received more that a two million in cash which has been parlayed with OSLAD grants It is the only way to obtain park land in new subdivisions for development. We may negotiate taking dry bottom detention areas in exchange for additional cash for development As a result of this ordinance, 15 parks are available for public use. Cash given has assisted in the development of many park areas We have received 43 acres of park land in neighborhoods and hundred's of thousands of dollars for purchases of land Helps to balance the impact of development. In the 1970's and early 80's, it was a good way to acquire park land The ordinance has been a valuable tool in obtaining land/or cash that can be used to satisfy the open space needs of new neighborhoods quicker than they may have been satisfied without the ordinance The ordinance has allowed our district to obtain land through out town that we would not have been able to buy with our limited funds Guarantees parkland for everyone forever It may help us save some green space that is the last undeveloped land within our community and provide a natural setting and buffer for residents as well as ensure that the ecosystems are not completely disturbed. It also provides "teeth" legally that developers will have to put aside a portion for parks and recreation The ordinance supplements our Capital Improvement Fund, which has been severely impacted by tax cap legislation. It has allowed us to place parks in newer parts of our territory without impacting traditional Capital Improvement funds. Money for Development The money brought in by this fund has enabled us to provide multiple park improvements (resurface tennis courts,resurface basketball courts, refurbish baseball fields, install 25 baseball field lights,resurface walking paths, install aerators in our ponds, install a new playground, etc.) Land that we wouldn't normally have received, cash for projects on small pieces of land, etc. Cash to make improvements and use with OSLAD grants We are a small agency with a limited budget and are unable to provide capital dollars to purchase land or make improvements We aver received significant dollars and hope to receive more Monetary contributions have allowed for improvements in park(s) near the development The present fee structure does not provide an adequate amount to be of any benefit We have the ability to make big improvements when we get the donations A fair and equitable way for new developers to pay their fair share of additional burdens Much needed development capital that can be leveraged for OSLAD funding. Can only be used for the area and park site in question as interpreted by our Village. Additional Suggestions The ordinance does not really have a benefit to my agency as none of the revenue generated goes into a general fund or other sources that would directly benefit this department. All monies collected go to the affected districts that can then use the funds to purchase land or construct improvements to benefit the residents of the developments from which the funds were generated Recognizes the potential impact to the agency on services While it has not produced large amounts of land or money, having the concept in place is important Gives us flexibility It is essential for our ability to serve the new residents Per unit methodology works well in a built-out community that experiences resubdivisions rather than new development Benefits are not to agency but to community Only feasible way to include park systems through the community We have received approximately 75,000 over a two year period 26 REFERENCES Bedimo-Rung, A.L., Mowen, A.J., & Cohen, D.A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health a conceptual model.American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 28, 159-168. Bernard, M. &Nance, E. (1996). Land Cash Donation Ordinances Naperville Revisited and Today. Preserving Public Land. Retrieved http://www.lib.niu.edu/lpo/I 996/ip960539.html. Bolund, P., &Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293-301. Flickinger, T., & Comerio, J., (2003). Illinois Association of Park Districts Land-Cash Donation Ordinance Survey Summary,Unpublished report, Illinois Association of Park Districts, Springfield IL. Godbey, G., Roy, M., Payne, L., & Orsega-Smith, E. (1998). The Relation between Health and Use of Local Parks. National Recreation Foundation. Kweon, B. S., Sullivan, W.C., & Wiley, A. (1998). Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment Behavior, 30, 832-858. Monson, M. (2006, Jan 13). Required land gifts for parks criticized. The News-Gazette. Retrieved March 7, 2006 from www.news-gazette.com. Sherer, P. (2003). The benefits of parks: Why Americans needs more city parks and open space. Retrieved November 10, 2007, from The Trust for Public Land Web site: http://www.tpl.org/content_documents/parks for_people_Jul2005.pdf. Scott, T. (2005). Updated Kendall land-cash law approved measure more than doubles developer cost for cash contributions. Ledger-Sentinel. 6/23/2005. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from Ledger-Sentinel Web site: http://www.ledgersentinel.com/article.asp?a=4138. 27 APPENDIX Figure 5. Number of Cities within each County that have a Land Dedication Ordinance 25 23 — 21 cn 20 N .r 16 C) 15 O L- W 10 9 E 4 6 5 Z 5 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 o°moo G°off o`E'a\o Qao'o �a�o va�oo o�0 �a� P m\o -\, o��A �o�� Oo'o 0 ate- G\2� � aao'o 1p 5 County 28 Table 2. Agencies that Responded to the Survey Agencies That Responded to the Survey Total Acres Accrued from Ordinance Arlington Heights Park District n/a Batavia Park District 150 of the current 358 they own Belvidere Park District 43 Bloomingdale Park District n/a Bolingbrook Park District 700 Boone County Conservation District n/a Buffalo Grove Park District n/a Byron Park District 1 Cary Park District n/a Channahon Park District n/a Deerfield Park District None DeKalb Park District n/a Downers Grove Park District n/a Dundee Township Park District 40 Elgin Parks and Recreation Department n/a Elmhurst Park District n/a Frankfort Park District 42 Genoa Township Park District n/a Glen Ellyn Park District n/a Glendale Heights (Village) n/a Glenview Park District n/a Grayslake Community Park District 180 Hanover Park Park District n/a Hinsdale Park and Recreation Department n/a Homewood-Flossmoor Park District n/a Joliet Park District 57 acres Kane County Forest Preserve District n/a Lake Zurich Park and Recreation Dept. n/a Lan-Oak Park District less than 2 Lemont Park District 14.5 Lindenhurst Park District n/a Lockport Township Park District 100+ Manteno (Village) n/a Matteson Parks and Recreation Department n/a McHenry Parks and Recreation Department n/a Mount Prospect Park District n/a Mundelein Park and Recreation District n/a Naperville Park District 1048 Oakbrook Terrace Park District n/a O'Fallon Parks and Recreation Department 10 Orland Park Recreation and Parks Department 150 Oswe oland Park District n/a Palatine Park District 37.5 Park Forest Recreation and Parks Department less than 5 Peoria Park District 25 Pleasant Dale Park District 0.65 Romeoville Recreation Department 184.5 29 Round Lake Area Park District 200 Saint Charles Park District 125 Schaumberg Park District n/a South Elgin Parks and Recreation Dept. 250 Spring Grove Village n/a Sycamore Park District 300+ Vernon Hills Park District n/a Warrenville Park District 0 Wauconda Park District n/a Westmont Park District n/a Wheaton Park District n/a 30 ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 A o J Legal ❑ Q NB #11 111, T 11 "AM Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Tracking Number W City Administrator ❑ °°°�^o �O Consultant ❑ Ke da��gaa, o ty EDC 2011-23 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: EDC Meeting Date and Time Meeting and Date: EDC—June 7, 2011 Synopsis: Discussion of future meeting dates and time Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: EDC 12/07/10 Action Taken: Approval of 2011 EDC meeting schedule. Item Number: EDC 2010-41 Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Meghan Ostreko Clerk's Office Name Department Agenda Item Notes: cip Memorandum ,Iloilo EST. 1836 To: Economic Development Committee ot�ilr� From: Meghan Ostreko, Clerk's Office ® Date: June 2, 2011 MndAC. Subject: EDC Meeting Date and Time <LE Up for discussion is the day and time of future Economic Development Committee meetings. Below is the meeting schedule that was approved by the committee at the 12/07/10 meeting: Economic Development Committee 1St Tuesday—6:30 pm January 4 July 5 February 1 August 2 March 1 September 6 A ri14 Monday, due to Election Da ) October 4 May 3 November 1 June 7 December 6 Please discuss whether the Committee would like to continue meeting on the 1St Tuesday of each month at 6:30 pm or if you would like to amend that schedule. Thank you.