The URL can be used to link to this page

Economic Development Packet 2011 05-03-11 o United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Esr. � 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 4 -� Telephone: 630-553-4350 0; Fax: 630-553-7575 ttE AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, May 3, 2011 6:30 p.m. Revised 4/29/11 City Hall Conference Room Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: March 7, 2011 Items Recommended by Plan Commission/ZBA for Approval: New Business: 1. EDC 2011-11 Building Permit Report for February & March 2011 2. EDC 2011-12 Building Inspection Report Summary for February & March 2011 3. EDC 2011-13 Digital Billboard Signs —Discussion 4. EDC 2011-14 Building Code Update Committee — Status Report 5. EDC 2011-15 Zoning Commission— Status Update 6. EDC 2011-16 Foreclosure Update Report for March and April 2011 7. EDC 2011-17 801 N. Bridge Street—Request for an Amended Landscape Covenant Old Business: Additional Business: 2010/2011 City Council Goals Economic Develo ment Committee Goal Elected Officials Staff Tourism. Werderich/Sutcliff Krysti Barksdale-Noble/ Glory Spies Economic development. Golinski/Munns Krysti Barksdale-Noble/ Bart Olson Downtown re-development. Golinski/Plocher Krysti Barksdale-Noble/ Bart Olson Integrated Transportation Plan implementation. Werderich/Golinski Krysti Barksdale-Noble/ Laura Schraw UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, May 3, 2011 6:30 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. March 7, 2011 ❑ Approved ❑ As presented ❑ As amended --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2011-11 Building Permit Report for February&March 2011 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2011-12 Building Inspection Report Summary for February&March 2011 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. EDC 2011-13 Digital Billboard Signs—Discussion ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2011-14 Building Code Update Committee— Status Report ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. EDC 2011-15 Zoning Commission— Status Update ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. EDC 2011-16 Foreclosure Update Report for Marchand April 2011 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. EDC 2011-17 801 N. Bridge Street—Request for and Amended Landscape Covenant ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 i o J a T Legal ❑ Minutes Finance ❑ EST. 1 � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ °^Y `O Public Works ❑ dal Cou^ty El`E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the Economic Development Committee—March 7, 2011 Meeting and Date: EDC—05/03/2011 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Committee Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Clerk's Office Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Monday, March 7, 2011, 6:30pm City Conference Room In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Gary Golinski Alderman Rose Spears Alderman Wally Werderich Other City Officials City Administrator Bart Olson Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble Building Code Official Paul Zabel Other Guests Tony Scott, Kendall County Record Lynn Dubajic, YEDC The meeting was called to order by Chairman Gary Golinski at 6:30pm and he welcomed all attendees. Minutes for Correction/Approval December 7, 2010 The minutes were approved as read. Items Recommended by Plan Commission for Approval: None New Business 1. EDC 2011-01 Downtown Merchants Association Discussion Chairman Golinski said there is a group of downtown merchants who wish to revive the Merchants Association and they have held two meetings. He asked that this be tabled until next month to allow the merchants to be notified of the EDC meetings. 2. EDC 2011-06 Building Permit Report for November and December 2010 and January 2011 There was no discussion 3. EDC 2011-07 Building Inspection Report Summary for November& December 2010 and January 2011 No discussion 4. EDC 2011-04 Foreclosure Update—2010 Summary 5. EDC 2011-08 Foreclosure Update for January and February 2011 Ms. Barksdale-Noble said there were peaks and valley in the 2010 foreclosures and 2011 is starting the same. She said the inventory is beginning to level off. It was noted 1 there about 400 bank-owned properties in the City at this time. The committee had a brief discussion about current conditions and possible future requirements for home- buying. It was noted that there are currently 6600 rental units in Yorkville with about 740 of those in some state of foreclosure or bank-owned, etc. 6. EDC 2011-05 Grainco FS— TIF Assistance Application Chairman Golinski and Lynn Dubajic asked for advance notification to this committee whenever TIF Applications are received. Ms. Olson said there are no development plans at this time for the property, however, he would bring these matters forward in the future. It was reported that Grainco wants to demolish buildings for marketability of the property. Attorney Orr has spoken with Grainco and they requested money upfront. However, a development plan must be present and there is no front-funding. Ms. Dubajic asked if there is a list of eligible reimbursement costs. Ms. Barksdale-Noble will forward an available list to her. Grainco has agreed to re-develop the site by December 31, 2014. Chairman Golinski summarized that this piece of property could be very instrumental in kick-starting the downtown. 7. EDC 2011-09 Proposed Developer/Petitioner Deposit Account Form Ms. Barksdale-Noble developed a standardized petitioner account form. This was in response to previous issues related to tracking developer petitions and deposit accounts. The form would advise petitioners of the process and require a sign-off holding the individual financially responsible. She requested feedback from the committee and they agreed this was a good tool. The Attorney and Finance Director have reviewed this. 8. EDC 2011-10 Ordinance Regarding Fee Schedule for Zoning Applications/Petitions Currently, City fees are found in various parts of the City Code. The zoning-related fees will not change, but will be placed in one spot. Any changes would be in amendment form. This will move to the March 22nd City Council meeting. Old Business 1. EDC 2010-23 Telecommunications Tower Fees This is a draft ordinance for tower fees and will be moved to the March 22nd Council meeting. Chairman Golinski noted an article that said cell towers might become obsolete and be replaced by smaller antennas mounted on light poles. Additional Business There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 6:54pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young 2 c/Ty Reviewed By: J� A O� Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number 1836 EST. Finance El NB #1 Engineer ❑ y City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number °°°° O Consultant ❑ " "°°""" ❑ EDC 2011-11 <LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Monthly Permit Activity Report(February&March 2011) Meeting and Date: EDC—Tuesday, May 3, 2011 Synopsis: All permits issued in the month of February, 2011 Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Paul Zabel Building and Zoning Name Department Agenda Item Notes: O�D c1TY r UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BUILDING PERMIT REPORT February 2011 Number of • ✓ r r — SFD ,, SSA lVinl�t�-Fazxul Ca>rl;mcrc>tal Industrial Misc. tronstruction � Permit Forrn rl_'w ,ern=le t°vpjily 5°i1t.'k j"'rlydrih r),,,rtrr'rm 1, r=1ul,:,s I{I r coot Le. .4. .• � II.IrrJr, 1:55 u('sl 11,11 1�4�acd l�riiiri� 1r•I�.:h.�;i t'{�i�r{+!rnrrriwrn �'rrl��r're,s'rrl+f^si ' I February 2011 11 0 0 0 6 0 5 29,451.00 822.00 Calendar Year 19 0 0 0 9 0 10 71.562.00 1,424.00 2011 Fiscal Year 2011 458 27 6 0 97 0 328 10,859,809.00 393,305.86 February 2010 17 4 0 0 9 0 4 1,221,270.00 35,745.47 Calendar Year 46 7 0 0 18 0 21 2,126,145.00 65,270.15 2010 Fiscal Year 2010 463 53 8 0 118 0 284 26,738,043.00 722,541.63 February 2009 20 - 0 0 0 10 - 0 - -10 405,594.00 8,974.00 Calendar Year 36 1 0 0 20 0 15 955,0400 17.336.50 2009 Fiscal Year 2009 603 75 38 0 180 0 310 59,119,383.00 1.435,718.36 February 2008 39 8 0 0 23 0 8 5,124,842.00 150,546.66 Calendar Year 82 14 0 0 41 0 27 6,327,191.00 208,612.32 2008 Fiscal Year 2008 973 178 100 5 272 0 418 107,124,906.00 4,837.998.50 Prepared by D Weinert UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE EMW 1835 BUILDING PERMIT REPORT °�'f�� ;� _=o March 2011 -Number of SFD SFA Multi-Family -- Commercial WusiriaI Misc, Construction Permit CCft7a�1 Snq:ii 1-rrrrr�!'i tirrjW,: :+r fr v1parwreew. f r+:.l refj',if'1fff'h4'frlvrrf4^rlror Cost Fees Issued 01ri^,{rrP I!!rrrf?er°� C' :le;rrunr.rrn! (nrnruerzl��!l.;r: March 2011 47 6 0 0 9 0 32 1.122381.00 68,182.68 Calendar Year 66 6 0 0 18 0 42 1.194.343.00 69,707.18 2011 Fiscal Year 2011 506 33 6 0 107 0 360 11,982,590.00 462,268.34 - 2 March 2010 46 5 0 0 7 0 34 2,576,358.00 44,533.67 Calendar Year 92 12 0 0 25 0 55 4,702,503.00 108,553.82 2010 Fiscal Year 2010 509 58 8 0 125 0 318 29,314,401.00 765,225.30 5-1-09 then 3-31-10 March 2009 40 3 0 0 22 0 15 3,961,170.00 83,686.36 Calendar Year 76 4 0 0 42 0 30 4,916,214.00 101,022.86 2009 Fiscal Year 2009 643 112 4 0 202 0 325 63,080,553.00 1,519,404.72 5-1-08 thru 3-31-09 March 2008 70 6 2 0 38 0 24 3,347,201.00 112,990.18 Calendar Year 154 22 2 0 79 0 51 10,246,212.00 334,596.50 2008 Fiscal Year 2008 1045 186 102 0 310 0 446 111,043,927.0 4,513,982.68 5-1-07 lhru 3-31-08 p Prepared by a Weinert c/Ty Reviewed By: J� A O� Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number 1836 EST. Finance El NB #2 Engineer ❑ y City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number °°°° O Consultant ❑ " "°°""" ❑ EDC 2011-12 <LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Monthly Inspection Report Summary(February&March 2011) Meeting and Date: EDC—Tuesday, May 3, 2011 Synopsis: All inspections performed in the month of February, 2011 Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Paul Zabel Building and Zoning Name Department Agenda Item Notes: EST 7636 °9 '" � < "Ins p ections February 2 711 ILE Type of inspection Single-Family Single-Tarnily Commercial Miscellaneous, RL—Inspections. (detached) (attached_) Monthly BKF- Backfill 0 0 0 0 0 0 BND Pool Bonding 0 0 0 0 0 0 BSM-Basement Floor 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRL-Crawl Space 0 0 0 0 0 0 FIN Final Inspection 4 0 3 2 2 9 FTG Footing 0 0 0 0 0 0 GAR-Garage Floor 1 0 0 0 0 1 INS-Insulation 4 0 0 1 1 5 OCC-Occupancy Inspection 0 0 0 0 0 0 OSR-Water Meter Reader 3 0 0 0 0 3 PH-Post Holes/Piles 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHD-Post Holes/Deck 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF-Post Holes/Fence 0 0 0 0 0 0 PPF-Pre-pour,Commercial Floor 0 0 0 0 0 0 PPS-Pre-pour,Slab-on-grade 0 0 0 0 0 0 PPW-Pre-pour,Wall Steel 0 0 0 0 0 0 REL-Rough Electrical 2 0 1 3 0 6 RFR-Rough Framing 3 0 0 1 1 4 RMC-Rough Mechanical 2 0 0 1 0 3 SPO-Spot Survey Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 STP-Stoop 0 0 0 0 0 0 TPL-Temporary Pool, Final 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRN -Trench (gas,electric,etc) 0 0 0 0 0 0 WPL-Wire Pull 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLU-Plumbing, Underslab 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLR-Plumbing,Rough 5 0 0 1 1 6 PLF-Plumbing, Final 5 0 2 0 3 7 RPZ-Plumbing, RPZ Valve 0 0 0 0 0 0 EDA-Engineering, Driveway Apron 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFL-Engineering, Final inspection 5 0 0 0 2 5 EPW-Engineering, Public Walk 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESS-Engineering,Storm Sewer 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESW-Engineering,Sewer/Water 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS... 34 0 6 9 10 49 - Inspected,by.» Paul Zabel 22 D.Weinert 0 Joe Wywrot 0 Darrell Busch 9 Jackie Dearborn 3 H2O(Water Department) 3 "B&F"(Plumbing) 0 "TPI"(Plumbing) 12 "ICCI" 0 TOTALS... 49 DATE: 03/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 10:22:23 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.wow INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2011 TO 02/28/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -- 11 ------------------------- ------------------------ ----------- 20100233 09/29/2010 2262 EMERALD DR SFD ACS EFL JD 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100369 09/08/2010 2351 EMERALD LN SFD ACS OSR H2O 02/18/2011 02/18/2011 P ACS EFL JD 02/22/2011 02/22/2011 F ACS FIN PZ 02/22/2011 02/22/2011 P ACS PLF TPI 02/22/2011 02/22/2011 F ACS PLF TPI 02/23/2011 02/23/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100382 07/30/2010 384 BERTRAM DR SFD B81 FIN PZ 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 P BB1 PLF TPI 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 P 20100446 09/08/2010 1162 KATE DR SFD HEC FIN PZ 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 F HEC EFL DB 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 F HEC PLF TPI 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 F HEC OSR H2O 02/15/2011 02/15/2011 P HEC EFL DB 02/15/2011 02/15/2011 P REINSPECTION HEC FIN PZ 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 P REINSPECTION HEC PLF PZ 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100513 10/07/2010 2558 EMERALD LN SFD ACS OSR H2O 02/18/2011 02/18/2011 P ACS EFL JD 02/22/2011 02/22/2011 F 20100540 10/20/2010 1356 SPRING ST SFD HEC GAR DB 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 P 20100553 10/26/2010 2343 LAVENDER WAY SFD ACS RFR PZ 02/03/2011 02/0312011 F ACS REL PZ 02/03/2011 02/03/2011 P ACS RMC PZ 02/03/2011 02103/2011 P ACS PLR TPI 02/03/2011 02/03/2011 F ACS INS PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P ACS RFR PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P REINSPECTION ACS PLR TPI 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P 20100554 10/26/2010 2333 LAVENDER WAY SFD ACS INS DB 02/0112011 02/01/2011 P ACS PLR TPI 02/01/2011 02/01/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100555 10/26/2010 2353 LAVENDER WAY SFD ACS RFR PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P ACS REL PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P ACS RMC PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P ACS PLR TPI 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 F ACS INS DB 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 F ACS PLR TPI 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 P ACS INS DB 02/11/2011 02/11/2011 P REINSPECTION 20100563 11/24/2010 1185 N BRIDGE ST CRM BLD REL PZ 02/01/2011 02/01/2011 P BLD FIN PZ 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 F BLD PLF TPI 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 F BLD FIN PZ 02/09/2011 02/02/2011 P REINSPECTION BLD PLF TPI 02/09/2011 02/09/2011 P REINSPECTION DATE: 03/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 10:22:23 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2011 TO 02/2812011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT N DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -----_ e_., ------------------------------------------- 20100613 12/13/2010 2501 EMERALD LN BSM BLD REL PZ 02/01/2011 02/01/201:1 P 20100616 11/1712010 1873 WALSH DR DCK DCK FIN DB 02/23/2011 02/23/2011 P 20110004 01/31/2011 1173 CODY CT BSM BLD PLR TPI 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 F BLD RFR PZ 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 P BLD REL PZ 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 P BLD RMC PZ 02/10/2011 02/10/2011 P BLD INS AB 02/16/2011 02/16/2011 P 20110009 01/20/2011 4631 PLYMOUTH AVE FNC FNC FIN DB 02/07/2011 02/07/2011 P 20110013 02/1112011 1955 MARKETVIEW DR CCO OCC FIN PZ 02/18/2011 02/18/2011 P 20110016 02/09/2011 701 HEUSTIS ST ELE ELE REL PZ 02110/2011 02/10/2011 P DATE: 03/25/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 10:22:23 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 02/01/2011 TO 02/26/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 6 CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 1 CRM COMMERCIAL REMODEL 5 DCK DECK 1 ELE ELECTRICAL UPGRADE 1 FNC FENCE 1 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 34 INSPECTION SUMMARY: EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 5 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 9 GAR GARAGE FLOOR 1 INS INSULATION 5 OSR WATER METER READER 3 PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 7 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 6 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 6 RFR ROUGH FRAMING 4 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 3 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: DB DARRELL BUSCH 9 H2O WATER DEPT 3 JD JACKIE DEARBORN 3 PZ PAUL ZABEL 22 TPI TPI INSPECTION SERVICES 12 STATUS SUMMARY: C DB 1 C PZ 5 C TPI 2 I DB B I H2O 2 I JD 1 I PZ 15 I Tex 7 • H2O 1 • JD 2 • PZ 2 • TPI 3 REPORT SUMMARY: 49 =`019 CI). i EST. t&1s I1T �l Inspections March 2411 Type of Inspection Slft&-Family Single-Family Commercial IVllscellaneous Re-Inspertions tdetached) (attached) --Monthly BKF- Backfill 2 0 0 0 0 2 BND-Pool Bonding 0 0 0 0 0 0 BSM -Basement Floor 1 0 0 0 0 1 CRL-Crawl Space 0 0 0 0 0 0 FIN-Final Inspection 1 0 3 4 0 13 FTG-Footing 2 0 0 1 0 3 GAR-Garage Floor 0 0 0 0 0 0 INS-Insulation 2 0 0 2 1 4 OCC-Occupancy Inspection 0 0 0 0 0 0 OSR-Water Meter Reader 1 0 0 0 0 1 PH-Post Hales/Piles 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHD-Post Holes/Deck 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF-Post Holes/Fence 0 0 0 1 0 1 PPF-Pre-pour,Commercial Floor 0 0 0 0 0 0 PPS-Pre-pour,Slab-on-grade 0 0 0 3 0 3 PPW-Pre-pour,Wall Steel 0 0 0 1 0 1 REL-Rough Electrical 1 0 0 5 0 6 RFR-Rough Framing 1 0 0 2 0 3 RMC Rough Mechanical 1 0 0 1 0 2 SPO Spot Survey Evaluation 0 0 0 0 0 0 STP-Stoop 0 0 0 0 0 0 TPL-Temporary Pool, Final 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRN Trench(gas,electric,etc) 0 0 0 0 0 0 WPL Wire Pull 0 0 0 0 0 0 PLU-Plumbing, Underslab 1 0 0 0 0 1 PLR-Plumbing, Rough 1 0 0 1 0 2 PLF-Plumbing, Final 1 0 0 7 3 8 RPZ-Plumbing, RPZ Valve 0 0 0 0 0 0 EDA-Engineering,Driveway Apron 0 0 0 0 0 0 EFL-Engineering, Final Inspection 1 0 0 3 1 4 EPW-Engineering, Public Walk 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESS-Engineering,Storm Sewer 1 0 0 0 0 1 ESW-Engineering,Sewer/Water 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTALS... 19 1 0 3 1 36 1 5 58 Inspected by... Paul Zabel 21 D.Weinert 0 Joe Wywrot 0 Darrell Busch 20 Jackie Dearborn 5 H2O(Water Department) 1 "B&F"(Plumbing) 0 "TPI"(Plumbing) 11 TOTALS... 58 DATE: 04'/29/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 11:15:03 INSPECTION REPORT ID'- PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2011 TO 03/31/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20090002 01/08/2009 405 SHADOW WOOD DR. REM BLD EFL DB 03/22/2011 03/22/2011 P 20100025 01/29/2010 2959 GRANDE TRAIL RCO OCC EFL JD 03/14/2011 03/14/2011 P 20100340 06/30/2010 42 W COUNTRYSIDE PKWY CCO OCC FIN PZ 03/08/2011 03/08/2011 P 20100540 10/20/2010 1358 SPRING ST SFD HEC FIN PZ 03/09/2011 03/09/2011 P HEC PLF TPI 03/09/2011 03/09/2011 P HEC OSR H2O 03/08/2011 03/08/2011 P HEC EFL DB 03/09/2011 03/09/2011 P 20100573 12/13/2010 207 HILLCREST AVE REM BPI REL PZ 03110/2011 03/10/2011 P BPI FIN PZ 03/23/2011 03/23/2011 P BPI PLF TPI 03/23/2011 03/23/2011 P 20100613 12/13/2010 2501 EMERALD LN BSM BLD FIN PZ 03/08/2011 03/08/2011 P 20100621 12/01/2010 821 PARKSIDE LN BSM BSM FIN PZ 03/14/2011 03/15/2011 P 20100623 12/08/2010 469 KELLY AVE SFD RIV PLR TPI 03/03/2011 03/03/2011 P RIV PLU TPI 03/03/2011 03/03/2011 P RIV RFR PZ 03/07/2011 04/07/2011 P ATV REL PZ 03/07/2011 04/07/2011 P RIV RMC PZ 03/07/2011 04/07/2011 P RIV INS PZ 03/11/2011 03/11/2011 F RIV INS DB 03/15/2011 03/15/2011 P RIV BSM DB 03/21/2011 03/21/2011 P 20100644 12/20/2010 221 W ELIZABETH ST ELE ELE REL PZ 03/22/2011 03/22/2011 P 20110012 02/09/2011 4524 MARQUETTE ST BSM BLD REL PZ 03/03/2011 03/03/2011 P BLD RFR PZ 0310312011 03/03/2011 P BLD INS PZ 03/08/2011 03/08/2011 P REINSPECTION 20110019 02/22/2011 308 COLTON ST REM BLD REL PZ 03125/2011 03/25/2011 P BLD RFR PZ 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P BLD PLR TPI 03/28/2011 03/28/2011 P BLD INS DB 03/28/2011 03/28/2011 P BLD RMC PZ 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P 20110020 03/14/2011 1585 CORAL DR SFD ACS FTG DB 03/17/2011 03/17/2011 P ACS BKF DB 03/22/2011 03/22/2011 P ACS ESW JD 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P 20110021 03/14/2011 2548 EMERALD LN SFD ACS FTG DB 03/17/2011 03/17/2011 P ACS BKF DB 03/22/2011 03/22/2011 P ACS ESW JD 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P ACS ESS JP 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P 20110022 02/15/2011 1901 S BRXDGE ST CCO OCC FIN PZ 03/30/2011 03/30/2011 P 20110025 02/22/2011 534 BLUESTEM LN RCO OCC FIN PZ 03/02/2011 03/02/2011 P OCC PLF TPI 03/02/2011 03/02/2011 F OCC PLF TPI 03/03/2011 03/03/2011 F REINSPECTION OCC PLF TPI 03/09/2011 03/09/2011 P OCC EFL JD 03110/2011 03/10/2011 P REINSPECTION 20110031 03/03/2011 301 E HYDRAULIC CCO OCC FIN DB 03/22/2011 03/22/2011 P 20110033 03/02/2011 516 POWERS CT A FNC FNC PHF DB 03/11/2011 03/11/2011 P 20110037 03/08/2011 302 E PARK ST ROF ROF FIN DB 03/17/2011 03/17/2011 P DATE: 04/29/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 11:15:03 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2011 TO 03/31/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------- 20110039 03/17/2011 1211 WILLOW WAY ADD BLD FTG DB 03/29/2011 03/29/2011 P BLD PPW DB 03/30/2011 03/30/2011 P 20110043 03/10/2011 521 CHESHIRE CT PTO PTO PPS DB 03/29/2011 03/29/2011 P 20110047 03/11/2011 462 TWINLEAF TR FNC FNC FIN DB 03/22/2011 03121/2011 P 20110051 03/14/2011 323 WINDETT RIDGE RE PTO PTO PPS DB 03/21/2011 03/21/2011 P 20110052 03/14/2011 681 OMAHA DR FNC FNC FIN DB 03/21/2011 03/21/2011 P 20110054 03/21/2011 304 E ORANGE ST ELE ELE REL PZ 03/29/2011 03/29/2011 P 20110060 03/18/2011 920 HAYDEN DR PTO PTO PPS DB 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 P 20110064 03/21/2011 1557 ORCHID ST FNC FNC FIN DB 03/28/2011 03/25/2011 P 20110065 03/30/2011 405 SHADOW WOOD DR RCO OCC FIN PZ 03/23/2011 03/23/2011 P OCC PLF TPI 03/23/2011 03/23/2011 F OCC PLF TPI 03/25/2011 03/25/2011 F REINSPECTION OCC PLF TPI 03/29/2011 03/29/2011 P REINSPECTION DATE: 04/29/2011 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 11:15:03 INSPECTION REPORT ID: PT440000.WOW INSPECTIONS SCHEDULED FROM 03/01/2011 TO 03/31/2011 ISSUE INSPECTION SCHED. COMP. PERMIT # DATE LOCATION TYPE FEE CODE EMP. DATE DATE RES. COMMENTS -------------------------------------------------------. ...-----------------------------.v,-----------._.._w..,_._--------- PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY: ADD ADDITION 2 BSM BASEMENT REMODEL 5 CCO COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 3 ELE ELECTRICAL UPGRADE 2 FNC FENCE 4 PTO PATIO / PAVERS 3 RCO RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY PERMIT 10 REM REMODEL 9 ROF ROOFING 1 SFD SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED 19 INSPECTION SUMMARY: BKF BACKFILL 2 BSM BASEMENT FLOOR 1 EFL ENGINEERING - FINAL INSPECTION 4 ESS ENGINEERING - STORM 1 ESW ENGINEERING - SEWER / WATER 2 FIN FINAL INSPECTION 13 FTG FOOTING 3 INS INSULATION 4 OSR WATER METER READER I PHF POST HOLE - FENCE I PLF PLUMBING - FINAL 8 PLR PLUMBING - ROUGH 2 PLU PLUMBING - UNDERSLAB 1 PPS PRE-POUR, SLAB ON GRADE 3 PPW PRE-POUR, WALL STEEL 1 REL ROUGH ELECTRICAL 6 RFR ROUGH FRAMING 3 RMC ROUGH MECHANICAL 2 INSPECTOR SUMMARY: DB DARRELL BUSCH 20 H2O WATER DEPT I JD JACKIE DEARBORN 5 PZ PAUL ZABEL 21 TPI TPI INSPECTION SERVICES 11 STATUS SUMMARY: C DB 7 C PZ 7 C TPI 4 I DB 13 I H2O I I JD 4 I PZ 14 I TPI 7 X JD 1 REPORT SUMMARY: 58 ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ NB #3 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Tracking Number W City Administrator ■ °°°�^o O Consultant Cea, ❑ Ke da vs—ty EDC 2011-13 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Digital Billboard Sign- Discussion Meeting and Date: EDC /May 3, 2011 Synopsis: Research compiled by staff at the request of the City Council regarding potential zoning provisions and revenue expected if LED digital billboard signs are permitted. Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 3/22/11 Action Taken: Budget Discussion Item Number: CC 2011-22 Type of Vote Required: None Action Requested: Direction Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memo. Memorandum EST. 1836 --�- To: Economic Development Committee 4 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator <LE ��'� Date: March 24, 2011 Subject: Digital LED Billboard Sign Research As requested during the March 22, 2011 City Council meeting budget discussion of alternative sources of revenue and policy options, staff has briefly researched various zoning regulations related to digital LED billboard signs. Below is a summary of that research and potential city revenue generated should they be permitted in Yorkville. Zoning & Regulatory Authority Research: Digital light emitting diode (LED) billboard signs utilize technology similar to high definition televisions, producing a vibrant digital color image allowing for changing billboard copy. Currently, Section 8-11-7 of the city's code strictly prohibits billboard signs anywhere in Yorkville. If that outright ban is lifted, the impact of permitting digital billboards along public streets and in public areas can be problematic if not effectively regulated. Upon review of various municipal ordinances recently passed, Title 92 of the Illinois Administrative Code Part 522 (IDOT) and information presented by the Federal Highway Administration in a memo dated September 25, 2007 (see attached), the primary areas for regulating digital LED billboard signs are: • Zoning District — Typically, billboard signs are permitted in non-residential zoning districts. However, billboard signs located within 660 feet along a Federal- Aid Primary (FAP) route are permitted only on property zoned and utilized for commercial or industrial uses.' Yorkville has four (4) FAP routes: Illinois 126 (FAP 326), Illinois Route 71 (FAP 311), US Route 30 (FAP 349), and US Route 34 (FAP 591).Attached is a map of potential locations for digital billboard signs on city-owned property located along a FAP route, some of which are currently zoned for commercial or industrial uses. • Luminosi . /Bri hg tness—most regulations established criteria for brightness levels of digital billboards to decrease the risk of glare or driver distraction. An acceptable maximum brightness for a digital billboard sign is no more than 0.3 foot-candles over ambient light levels measured within 150 feet of the sign.2 • Location — most ordinances determined the permissible location of digital LED billboards based upon safety considerations of the motoring public (street setbacks) and proximity to residential uses. o Distance and Placement — there is typically a minimum distance requirement between another billboard and a maximum number of ' Title 92 Illinois Administrative Code 522 Subchapter f(Department of Transportation) 2 Illuminating Engineering Society of North America(IESNA) billboards located within a linear mile along a roadway (regardless if on they are on opposite sides of the roadway). • Aesthetics/ Traffic Safety — both state and local ordinances reviewed establishes criteria for billboard sign and display appearance. Similar to most standard sign ordinances, most have bulk requirements and that the digital billboard sign not have moving or oscillating parts, blinking lights and are structurally sound. • Sign Area, Size and Height — billboard sign area or size is typically measured by the surface area of the copy and usually does not exceed 500 square feet. The average height for billboard signs is 35 feet above grade. • Length of Display Time & Transition between images — Digital billboard images usually adhere to the industry standard of 8-10 seconds for display time and transition between images within 2 seconds to minimize driver distraction.3 Benefits to Local Businesses & Community The economic impact to businesses within Yorkville should digital LED billboard signs be permitted was also researched. Significant benefits to small and medium sized businesses using digital LED billboards include: the flexibility to customize and update information in real- time; increased visibility than traditional wall or ground-mounted signs; and the ability to provide greater visual impact. They are also more cost-efficient than a conventional billboard, since digital billboards displays are purchased in increments of time rather than by overall ad space. Digital billboards can also offer a public service. Some communities have partnered with outdoor advertising companies to provide time and space for promoting government programs/information or for emergency announcements, such as missing persons and disaster alerts. Potential City Revenue Recently, there has been a renewed interest by some local governments to seek revenue from digital billboard ads. Local governments may approach revenue stream from digital billboards through building permit and inspection fees for sign construction; by collecting leasing fees from advertisers who install the signs on city-owned property; excise or use tax on revenue generated from ad sales; real estate taxes on assessed value of billboard signs; or a combination of the above. Recent examples of revenue generated by cities from billboards include: • Los Angeles, CA — in October 2010, city council proposed a 12% excise tax on billboards with an anticipated annual revenue stream of$24 million. • Philadelphia, PA — in 2005, the city approved a 7% tax on billboards within the city. • New York, New York—in November 2010, estimated that $22 million in revenue can be generated by collecting the lease fees for billboards located on city-owned property and real estate revenue for privately-owned parcels with billboards. 3 Source: Outdoor Advertising Association of America,Inc.and the National League of Cities. • Medford, MA—in June 2010 negotiated a deal with Clear Channel for a payment- in-lieu-of-taxes agreement that will generate $50,000 annually for the next 25 years for the use of city-owned property along an interstate. • Miami-Dade County — collects $220,000 in rental fees and 16% of the ad space revenue from a supersized digital billboard located on a county-owned eight-story building. However, digital billboard signs have not been without controversy, as a recent article in the February 2011 edition of PublicWorks4 reports that seven (7) states and as many as 23 cities and counties throughout the country have banned or are considering a moratorium on digital billboards. Staff Comments The City has received offers of interest to install LED digital billboard signs along some State routes in Yorkville. Staff is seeking direction from the EDC if we should pursue amending our current sign regulations to permit digital billboard signs; and if so, solicit bids from outdoor advertising companies to lease space on city-owned land for billboards. 4 www.pwma. Site ID PIN site-address Acres N 1 02-32-277-001 1.76 2 02-29-201-006 0.52 3 02-29-202-006 10.96 �S 4 05-05-443-016 - 4.37 5 02-04-300-005 4600 N Bridge St 2.10 6 05-04-402-010 1809 Country Hills Dr 2.05 7 05-04-401-018 1908 Raintree Rd 0.25 8 05-03-380-001 1148 Hawk Hollow Dr 2.14 30 9 05-04-101-008 109 Colonial Pkwy 0.24 10 05-05-400-024 - 0.06 11 02-33-154-020 - 0.03 12 02-32-283-009 - 0.11 13 02-32-278-007 201 W Hydraulic Ave 0.46 14 02-33-154-022 - 0.47 I 5 I 15 02-33-153-006 131 E Hydraulic Ave 0.06 t 16 02-33-153-008 131/201 E Hydraulic Ave 2.12 j 17 02-33-154-009 - 0.09 18 02-21-301-002 - 1.22 ! a 19 02-28-351-011 610 Tower Ln 0.49 20 02-29-427-002 910 Game Farm Rd 15.78 i 21 02-28-302-008 910 Game Farm Rd 7.47 22 02-30-203-002 1474 Sycamore Rd 3.53 23 02-30-101-002 1711 John St 8.07 24 02-21-301-012 1975 N Bridge St 1.00 25 02-28-351-020 610 Tower Ln 1.27 - 26 05-04-151-026 185 Wolf St 2.65 j I 27 05-05-276-004 193 Wolf St 1.34 _ _L; ........... I 28 02-28-126-010 202 ECountryside Pkwy 4.55 29 02-32-287-001 111 W Madison St 0.46 1 30 02-33-153-013 - 0.23 IL, 31 02-33-153-011 - 0.19 32 02-33-104-001 301 N Bridge St 2.36 33 02-32-283-008 1 West Alley 0.02 1 c� 34 02-30-101-001 1711 John St 8.72 24 3 - 34 '1 I 34 22 i 28 �. i 34 71 r_ I j -.._ .-.-_.._ 2 23 20 - - 21 I 19 25 32 31 30 14 13 .I 16 \ 33 1•i i 15 12 29 17 I ' 27 10 126 26 °� I 1 7 126 ------------------- � I r I I I I r� ,�. ♦ ! \ 47 71 ! I U I I r= II I Ij I Ij I I I I Legend PF 660' Buffer of State Highways City Properties Within Buffer December 2 10-United City of Yorkville GIS ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ NB #4 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Agenda Item Tracking Number City Administrator ■ °°°�^o O Consultant ❑ Ke da�vsea, o ty EDC 2011-14 <�E El City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Building Code Update Committee— Status Report Meeting and Date: EDC /May 3, 2011 Synopsis: Report of ongoing activities related to the Building Code Update Committee. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 12/07/10 Action Taken: None Item Number: EDC-2010-29 Type of Vote Required: N/A Council Action Requested: Informational Item Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memorandum. Cpl 0 Memorandum EST. � 1836 --� To: Economic Development Committee p11 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator <kE Date: March 24, 2011 Subject: Building Code Update Committee—Status Report On March 21, 2011, the Building Code Update Committee (BCUC) recommended adoption of the 2005 National Electrical Code (NEC). This meeting concluded the committee's nearly 8-month review and recommendation for adoption, with amendments, to the following ten (10) codes: ■ 2009 International Fuel Gas Code ■ 2009 International Energy Conservation Code (IL Energy Efficient Building Act) ■ 2009 International Plumbing Code/Illinois Plumbing Code (recent version) ■ 2009 International Mechanical Code ■ 2009 International Property Maintenance Code ■ 2009 International Fire Code ■ 2009 International Residential Code ■ 2009 Building Code ■ 2009 International Existing Building Code ■ 2005 National Electrical Code The proposed amendments by the Building Code Update Committee will be forwarded to the City Attorney for review and draft ordinance preparation. We are in the process of preparing a comprehensive summary memorandum of the committee's proposed recommendations and amendments, along with staff comments. It is anticipated this summary memo will be presented to the EDC in May, prior to the public hearing process and City Council vote. Staff is seeking the EDC's feedback on holding an open house for residents prior to the public hearing to review the codes and recommendations, ask questions and offer comments. 1 ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ NB #5 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Agenda Item Tracking Number City Administrator ■ °°°�^o O Consultant ❑ Ke da�vsea, o ty EDC 2011-15 <�E El City Council Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Zoning Commission— Status Report City Council / COW/Committee Agenda Date: EDC /May 3, 2011 Synopsis: Report of ongoing activities related to the Zoning Commission and the comprehensive update of the zoning ordinance. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 12/07/10 Action Taken: None Item Number: EDC-2010-28 Type of Vote Required: N/A Council Action Requested: Informational Item Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memorandum. Cpl 0 Memorandum EST. � 1836 To: Economic Development Committee O �� a=� ►� From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director N CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator <LE 1� Date: April 28, 2011 Subject: Zoning Commission— Status Report Since staff's last update to the EDC regarding the progress of the Zoning Commission, several chapters have been researched, reviewed, discussed and revised. The following highlights some of the Zoning Commission's proposed revisions to the chapters of the Zoning Ordinance: Table of Contents • Proposed new chapters with specific regulations for alternative energy systems (wind and solar); fences, screens and walls; and adult-oriented uses were included. Chapter 1: Zoning Purpose & Interpretation • Added more definitive language with regard to ensuring the provisions of the Subdivision Control Ordinance was also a consideration of the zoning process. • A severability clause was included to protect the integrity of the remaining sections of the ordinance should a portion of it be challenged in court. Chapter 2: Rules and Definitions • Updated several irrelevant or obsolete words or definitions, and incorporated newer terminology which reflects current policies, procedures or technology. Chapter 3: General Provisions • Some proposed revisions related to how home occupations are regulated which takes into consideration contemporary lifestyles, State authority over in-home daycare operations, and the increase of home-based professions/careers. • Incorporation of a table which clearly lists which accessory structures, buildings and obstructions are permitted in which required yard. Chapter 4: Zoning Administration and Enforcement • Significant revisions within this chapter includes updating the administrative and enforcement aspects of the zoning entitlement process (i.e., text and map amendments, special use approval, variances, 1.5 mile review) to bring it more in line with the actual practices and procedures of the City. Chapter 5: Zoning Districts and Maps • New zoning districts such as Historic Overlay District (HOD), Conservation Design District(CDD), and Open Space (OS) District have been proposed. 1 Chapter 6: Permitted and Special Uses • Incorporation of a new user-friendly format providing an overview of all the zoning districts' permitted and special uses in a single chart. This will be in addition to the traditional text list provided in the individual district chapters. • This chapter also focused on compliance with federal regulations related to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) ensuring equal treatment when designating religious assembly and non-religious assembly as permitted or special use. Chapter 7: Dimensional and Bulk Regulations • New chapter which provides a chart and graphic format all the zoning districts' regulations regarding minimum lot size, building setbacks, maximum height requirements, density, floor area ratio, etc. Chapter 8: Planned Unit Developments • The most significant proposed change to this chapter is the reversion back to establishing a Planned Unit Development as a Special Use rather than a district. This is in conformance with 65 ILCS 5/11-13-1.1 of the Illinois Statutes. The proposed revision to the Planned Unit Development Ordinance adopted in 2006, reorganizes and streamlines the review/approval process, as well as adds provisions to address current issues faced with stalled developments in a slow economy. There is also an added provision requiring the approval of a Final Plat for Planned Unit Developments which has been the City's practice, but does not currently exist in the ordinance. (Please refer to attached) Chapter 9: A-1 Agricultural District • The proposed revisions to the A-1 Agricultural District mainly update the list of permitted and special uses for the district based upon the previously revised Chapter 6 table. Also, the incorporation of modern sustainable farming techniques such as growing non-food crops for biof eels conversion and reforestation. As mentioned previously, a final written assessment report prepared by the Zoning Commission will be submitted to the EDC along with a recommendation for adoption of the new zoning ordinance at the conclusion of the review. The City Council will then conduct a public hearing soliciting citizen comments prior to voting on adopting the proposed revisions. Handouts and an informational meeting for the Zoning Board of Appeals and Plan Commission members summarizing the zoning ordinance changes will also be conducted by staff. 2 CHAPTER 8 Planned Unit Development SECTION: 10-13-1: Purpose and Intent 10-13-2: Authority 10-13-3: Definition and Size Limitations 10-13-4: Procedures for Establishment 10-13-5: Pre-Application Conference 10-13-6: Concept PUD Plan Review 10-13-7: Preliminary PUD Plat 10-13-8: Final PUD Plat 10-13-9: Amendments or Minor Revisions to PUD Plat 10-13-10: Conditions for Approval 10-13-11: Development Standards and Design Criteria 10-13-12: Fees 10-13-13: Separability 10-13-14: Effective Period of Planned Unit Development 10-13-15: Effective Date 1'0VW 10-13-1: PURPOSE AND INTENT: Planned Unit Developments are unique and differ substantially from conventional subdivisions and therefore require administrative processing as "Special Uses"under this Title. Planned Unit Developments are a complex type of Special Use, potentially consisting of various land uses and design elements, requiring the establishment of more specific procedures, standards and exceptions from the strict application of the zoning district regulations to guide the recommendations of the Plan Commission and the action of the City Council. The purpose of this chapter, therefore, is to provide for an alternative zoning procedure under which land can be developed or redeveloped with innovation, increased amenities and creative environmental and architectural design than would be possible to achieve under the otherwise standard zoning district regulations while being in general compliance with the planning objectives and intent of the zoning ordinance. Under this procedure, well planned residential, industrial/manufacturing, commercial and other types of land uses, individually or in combination, may be developed with design flexibility allowing for full utilization of the topographical and environmental characteristics of the site. Planned Unit Developments must have an approved development plan which provides for a unified design, contiguity between various elements and be environmentally compatible with the surrounding area. There should be an increased benefit upon the health, safety and general welfare of the public and particularly, in the immediate surroundings,than developments built in conformity with the underlying district regulations. If building density is increased above densities allowable by the zoning district in which the use would be permitted on a particular portion of a PUD;then the amount of open space,retention of existing vegetation, buffer areas, new landscape, public commons, community open space, and parks shall be evaluated for proportionate increase for the remainder of the PUD. The Planned Unit Development is not intended to be a mechanism solely used for the allowance of increased densities or as a means of circumventing the bulk regulations or zoning standards under this Title, 73 rather a Planned Unit Development shall generally provide attributes in excess of conventional city zoning, building and other land use requirements such as,but not limited to the following: A. Providing a maximum choice of the overall living environment through a variety of type, design and layout of residential structures, commercial and industrial buildings, office and research uses and public facilities; B.Demonstrating excellence in environmental design and the mitigation of land use factors or impacts; C.Promoting a more useful pattern of dedicated open space and recreation areas incorporated as part of the development plan and that is compatible with the immediate vicinity; D. Provide public access and pedestrian connectivity via bicycle/recreational paths, sidewalks and/or alternative modes of transportation. E. Providing and or preserving substantial landscaping with emphasis given to streetscape areas, buffer zones, and the provision of significant landscaping(in terms of size of landscape areas and quantity and quality of landscape materials)within the developed portions of the site; F. Incorporating a consistent architectural theme which is unique to the specific site and surrounding community through the use of building materials, signage and way-finding standards as well as design elements. Generic corporate architecture and big box designs are strongly discouraged but not prohibited.Uses should be designed according to the limitation of the site rather than the removal of the limitations. Specific design details such as roof parapets, architectural details, varying roof heights, pitches and materials and building colors and materials should be addressed; G. Retain, utilize and incorporate historic features on the project site into the overall project design, if physically and economically feasible;and/or H. Promote and strengthen the economic vitality and enhance the aesthetic qualities of unified large-scale commercial developments. I. Encourage high-quality planned industrial park environments and well-designed business centers for single or multiple-tenant facilities. J. Provide/enhance regional public infrastructure such as roadways, water/sanitary service, storm water management objectives. 10-13-2: AUTHORITY: A. The Plan Commission shall review and recommend approval, approval with modification or denial of applications for Planned Unit Developments. The City Council shall have final decision to approve, approve with modification,or deny applications for Planned Unit Developments. B. The procedures set forth in this chapter shall apply to all Planned Unit Developments. C. Planned Unit Developments may be allowed in each of the zoning districts in the United City of Yorkville only as a Special Use as prescribed in Chapter 6: Permitted and Special Uses and approved pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 10-4-9 of this Title. D. Bulk regulations set forth in the Zoning Ordinance shall not apply to Planned Unit Developments; provided, however, that the Off-Street Parking and Loading regulations set forth in Chapter 18 of this Title shall apply to all Planned Unit Developments. 74 10-13-3: DEFINITION AND SIZE LIMITATIONS: A Planned Unit Development is a tract of land which is developed as a unit under single ownership or control, which includes two (2) or more principal buildings, and which is at least four (4) acres in area, except for planned developments operated by a municipal corporation which shall be at least two (2) acres in area, and Planned Unit Developments in manufacturing districts which shall be at least ten(10) acres in area. All land area within a Planned Unit Development must be contiguous;provided that properties separated by highways, streets, public ways, railroads or other public utility right-of-ways may be deemed contiguous for the purpose of qualifying as a Planned Unit Development. Pursuant to the procedures set herein, the establishment of a Planned Unit Development shall be applicable to the addition of property to an existing Planned Unit Development. 10-13-4: PROCEDURES FOR ESTABLISHMENT: A. Planned Unit Development applications shall be made as hereinafter provided and shall be accompanied by the required plats and documents. Detailed plans, drawings and other information as specified in this Title shall be required at the time of the various phases, meetings and hearings as detailed herein.Each stage shall be reviewed and certified by the Zoning Administrator as being in accordance with the Planned Unit Development requirements before proceeding to the next stages. The approval process shall include the following stages: 1. Pre-Application Conference- Introductory meeting held with City staff as set forth in Section 10-13-5 of this Chapter. 2. Concept PUD Plan Review- An informal review of overall concept conducted by the City Council to provide constructive feedback to petitioner of plan as set forth in Section 10-13-6 of this Chapter. 3. Preliminary PUD Plat- First,a technical review of detailed plans by various city departments at a Plan Council meeting is held;a public hearing is then conducted by the Plan Commission;and final determination is made by the City Council,as set forth in Section 10-13-7 of this Chapter. 4. Final PUD Plat- A public hearing is then conducted by the Plan Commission with final determination made by the City Council, as set forth in Section 10-13-8 of this Chapter. B. The final two (2) stages of the PUD process, Preliminary PUD Plat and Final PUD Plat, may be submitted and reviewed concurrently, as determined by the Plan Council, based upon the following criteria: 1.The PUD plan forwards the goals of the city's planning objectives and official plans, including but not limited to, the Integrated Transportation Plan, Downtown Vision Plan, Stormwater Management Plan and various watershed development plans. 2.The PUD plan requires limited variances from the use or bulk regulations of the conventional/underlying zoning district in which it is to be located. 75 3.The benefits of the PUD plan should forward or exceed the goals of the development standards and regulations of city ordinances; including but not limited to, the Subdivision Control Ordinance, Landscape Ordinance, Sign Ordinance, Design Guidelines and Water Conservation Ordinance. 10-13-5: PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE: A. Purpose: The purpose of the pre-application conference is to provide information, guidance and assistance to the applicant before preparation of the concept plan so that the applicant may receive informal input on: 1. Whether the proposed Planned Unit Development will be in conformity with the planning and other development goals and the policies of the United City of Yorkville. 2. Whether the existing zoning and land use in the general area of the Planned Unit Development is appropriate for a Planned Unit Development. B.Procedure:Prior to filing an application for approval of a Planned Unit Development,the petitioner shall be required to contact the city administrator or his designee to arrange an informal pre-application meeting with city staff and its consultants. 1. The pre-application conference is mandatory and shall be held with staff,but is at no charge to the petitioner.At such conference,the applicant shall provide information relating to the following: a. The location of the proposed Planned Unit Development; b. The land use types and approximate area of proposed land uses; c. A list of any and all exceptions to the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations requested; and d. Other information pertinent to the proposed Planned Unit Development. 2. The pre-application conference shall be an informal communication and discussion of the proposed Planned Unit Development, and no commitments shall be given,nor shall statements or opinions of the city staff and its consultants be deemed binding. 3. Staff shall review and provide input on the proposal's compatibility with the comprehensive plan and the goals and policies for planning of the city and advise the applicant on the information, documents,exhibits,and drawings on the proposal that should be included in the application to the city for a Planned Unit Development. (Ord.2006-40,5-23-2006) 10-13-6: CONCEPT PUD PLAN REVIEW: A. Purpose: The presentation of a Concept PUD Plan is optional.The purpose of the Concept PUD Plan is to enable the applicant to obtain the informal feedback from the city staff and City Council regarding the overall project concept, density and dwelling unit or land use type prior to spending considerable time and expense in the preparation of detailed preliminary PUD plans. 76 B. Procedure: Not less than forty-five (45) days before the next available City Council meeting, the applicant shall submit to the City for review the conceptual Planned Unit Development plan. The submittal shall consist of twenty (20) paper copies folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope and two (2) electronic copies of the following documentation: 1. A completed notarized application form,two(2)originals and the remainder photocopies. 2. The application shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3. An aerial photograph exhibit of the property taken within the last two (2) years. The aerial photograph exhibit shall be one-inch equals one-hundred(1"= 100) scale,but no less than one-inch equals four hundred(1"=400)and shall include the following: a.Title or Name of the proposed Planned Unit Development. b. Outline of property boundaries. c.Adjacent area within one-fourth(1/4)mile of property. 3. A zoning plat including a legal description of the property with total property acreage notated to be included in the Planned Unit Development. 4. A written explanation of the general character of the proposed Planned Unit Development that shall include the following: a. A description of all proposed land uses(including open space)with percentages of each use; b. Projected densities and housing type for each residential use; c. A description of the development standards and design criteria applicable to the proposed Planned Unit Development; d. An outline describing why the property should be developed as a Planned Unit Development; e. Identification of the conventional zoning classification allowing the uses for each land use type included and compatibility to the future land use designation for the property in the City's official Comprehensive Plan; f. Identification of existing uses and zoning of adjacent properties to the Planned Unit Development. g.A list of requested exceptions to applicable city ordinances and codes. 5. A written description of general site information that should include, but shall not be limited to, the following,if known or available: a. Existing site conditions. b. Environmental characteristics. c. Availability of community facilities and utilities. d. Existing covenants. 77 6. A conceptual Planned Unit Development sketch or land plan. The sketch or land plan shall provide sufficient detail to demonstrate the physical relationship between the existing land condition, surrounding land uses and the proposed Planned Unit Development,and shall include the following: a.North arrow(true meridian),scale and date of preparation. b.Name and address of the site planner,or engineer who prepared the plan. c.Name of property owner. d.Name of petitioner/developer. e.Proposed name of the Planned Unit Development. f. Location map showing the location of the Planned Unit Development within or proximity to the corporate boundaries. g. Boundary and/or property lines of proposed development and dimensions of the lots into which the property is proposed to be subdivided. h. Proposed land uses, and total acreage and percent of the site devoted to each land use including minimum and average lot sizes and proposed dedication of land for school and park sites, if applicable. C. City Council Review: The City Council shall conduct an informal review of the conceptual Planned Unit Development plan and supporting documentation and provide the applicant with general comments on the following: 1. Compatibility of the proposal with the transportation plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance and land use planning goals and objectives of the city. 2. Appropriateness of the proposed land uses. 3. General layout of open space,streets,parking areas,lots and buildings. 4. Other information the City Council would recommend be prepared for the preliminary Planned Unit Development plan phase. 10-13-7: PRELIMINARY PUD PLAT: A. Purpose: The purpose of the Preliminary PUD Plat submission is to obtain approval from the City that the plans the applicant intends to prepare and follow are acceptable as a Preliminary PUD Plat,and that any final plans will be approved provided they substantially conform to the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. Approval of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat shall not constitute authority to proceed with construction of any improvements but rather an approval of the general features of the plans as a basis for preparing the final plans. B. Procedure: Not less than forty five (45) days before the Plan Commission meeting, the applicant shall file an application with the Clerk's Office for Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat approval. The applicant shall submit twenty (20)paper copies folded to fit in a 10"x 13"envelope and two (2) electronic copies of the following documentation: 1.A completed notarized application form,two(2)originals and the remainder photocopies. 78 2. The application shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fees. 3. Disclosure of beneficiaries form and statement of present and proposed ownership of all land within the development. 4. An aerial photograph exhibit of the property taken within the last two (2) years of the adjacent area within one-fourth (1/4) mile of property. The aerial photograph exhibit shall be one-inch equals one-hundred(1"= 100)scale,but no less than one-inch equals four hundred(1"=400). 5. Written explanation of the character of the Planned Unit Development and the reasons why it has been planned to vary from the conventional Zoning Ordinance regulations.This explanation shall detail how the proposed Planned Unit Development meets the objectives of all official plans which affect the subject property. 6. Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. The plat shall be a detailed plan which includes at a minimum,the following information: a. Title notation stating"Preliminary Plat"or"Preliminary Plan". b. North arrow,scale(not less than 1 inch equals 100 feet)and date of preparation. c. Name and address of the site planner,engineer or surveyor who prepared the plan. d. Name of property owner. e. Name of petitioner/developer. f. Proposed name of the Planned Unit Development or subdivision name, which shall not duplicate the name of any plat previously recorded in Kendall County. g. Location map showing the general area of the Planned Unit Development within or proximity to the corporate boundaries. h. Legal description prepared by a registered land surveyor. i. Boundary lines—bearings and distances. j. Site data,including,as applicable: 1) Current zoning classification. 2) Total area of property in square feet and acreage, and percentage of each proposed land use. 3) Square footage and percent of site coverage with buildings. 4) Square footage and percent of site coverage with impervious surfaces. 79 5) Square footage and percent of site covered dedicated to common open space such as storm water management systems, landscaping and buffers, parks, trail corridors and recreational areas. 6) Total number of off-street parking and loading spaces provided and method used to calculate the number of required spaces for each land use. 7) Total number of buildings. 8) Total number of residential dwelling units by type, and the number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit type. 9) Gross Floor Area for all non-residential buildings/uses. 10) Gross and net densities for the overall Planned Unit Development and for each land use. a. Residential Density: Provide information on the density of residential uses, including dwelling units per acre, dwelling units per net acre; gross and net residential density (dwelling units per acre of land devoted to residential sectors of the PUD; gross being all land, net being gross acres minus land used for public or common usage). Information should also be provided for each unit in the Planned Unit Development,if applicable. b. Non-Residential Intensity: Provide information on the type and amount of non-residential uses including building locations, sizes, floor area ratio, building height,the amount and location of common open space. 11) Minimum,maximum and average lot sizes. 12) Percent of lot coverage for all uses except detached single-family and duplex. k. Depiction of Lots: a. Residential lots shall depict approximate lot dimensions;building footprints for all multi- family and single-family attached structures;and dimensioned required yard setbacks. b. Non-residential lots shall depict building footprints and dimensioned setbacks. Information regarding purpose/use and height of non-residential buildings shall also be provided. 1. Existing zoning and land use of adjacent property within five hundred feet (500') of all sides of the site. 80 m. Other conditions of adjoining land — owners of un-platted land; subdivision plat name, recording date and number of adjoining platted land; actual direction and gradient of ground slope, including any embankments or retaining walls; character and location of major buildings, railroads, power lines and towers. n. Municipal limits. o. School district boundaries. p. .Existing easements—location,width and purpose. q. Location of existing streets in, and adjacent to, the property including: street name, right-of-way width,existing and proposed center lines,pavement type,walks,trails,curbs,gutters,culverts,etc. r. Proposed public improvements such as highways and other major improvements planned by public authorities for future construction on or near the property. s. Existing utilities on, and adjacent to, the property including: location, size and invert elevation of sanitary and storm sewers; location and size of water mains; location of gas lines, fire hydrants, electric and telephone lines (above and below ground) and street lights; direction and distance to, and size of nearest water mains and sewers adjacent to the property showing invert elevations. t. Ground elevations on the property and on the first fifty feet (50') of all adjacent parcels showing a minimum of one foot(1')contours for land which slopes less than one-half percent('/2%)along with all breaks in grades, and all drainage channels or swales, and at selected points not more than one hundred feet (100') apart in all directions; for land that slopes more than one-half percent ('/2%) showing a minimum of two foot (2') contours. Any land within the one hundred (100) year floodplain,as determined by the City Engineer or an outside consultant,shall also be shown. u. Subsurface conditions on the property shall be shown,if deemed required by the City Engineer or an outside consultant. This includes the location and results of tests made to subsurface soil, rock and groundwater conditions,depth to groundwater,unless test pits are dry at a depth of fifteen feet(15'); location and results of a soil percolation test if individual sewage disposal systems are proposed. v. Water courses, marshes, rock outcrop, wooded areas, existing vegetation, isolated trees four inches (4")or more in diameter at breast height,existing structures and other significant features. w. Location of all proposed off-street parking and loading areas, including dimensions of parking spaces,drive aisles and loading zones. x. Configuration of all land proposed as open space including storm water management areas, parks, buffers,and trail corridors. 81 y. All sites to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for parks, school sites,public buildings, and similar public and quasi-public uses. z. Pedestrian and/or bicycle circulation systems. aa.Limits of jurisdictional and non jurisdictional wetlands. bb.Any other data reasonably necessary to provide an accurate overview of the proposed development. 7. Preliminary landscape plan indicating the name, variety, size, location and quantities of plant material for all common and dedicated areas including parkways, buffer areas, storm water basins, wetlands, entry areas,medians, and parking lot islands. The landscape plan shall also depict permanent signs and street fixtures,and a detail plan of landscaping for a typical building area. 8. Preliminary engineering plan which shall be drawn on a print of the proposed land use plan. The proposed plan shall illustrate an appropriate location and dimensions of all sanitary sewers, storm sewers, and water lines for all proposed land uses, drainage ditches, culverts and storm water retention/detention areas,as well as all utility easements,and be accompanied with: a.A feasibility report or statement from the sanitary district attesting to the capability of the existing sewer system and wastewater treatment facility to service the proposed development. b.Preliminary stormwater report. c.Preliminary mass grading plan. d.Traffic analysis or study, prepared by a transportation engineer or planner, which analyzes the impact caused by the Planned Unit Development on the street and highway systems. 9. Architectural drawings. Preliminary architectural drawings for all primary buildings and accessory buildings shall be submitted which include: a. Typical elevations(front,rear and side)for proposed residential and nonresidential buildings,which identify materials and color styling proposed for all elements of the building. b.Proposed building heights. c. Roof plan for all nonresidential structures, which shows the proposed location of all roof mounted mechanical equipment. 10.Development Plan Schedule indicating: a. Stages in which the project will be built, with emphasis on area, density, use of public facilities, and open space to be developed with each stage. 82 b. Each stage as a separate unit. The unit shall be described and mapped on the project. Overall design of each unit shall be shown on the plan and through supporting graphic materials. c. Dates for beginning and completion of each stage. 11. The Plan Commission or City Council may require preparation and submittal, at the petitioner's expense, of the following for review and evaluation: a.Fiscal impact study,detailing the estimated cost which the Planned Unit Development will have on all taxing bodies, and anticipated revenues to such taxing bodies which will be realized from each phase of development.Information shall include detailed estimates on: 1) Expected population of the development; 2) Impact on service and/or operating costs to be incurred by each taxing body as a result of the development; 3) Any major capital investments required, in part or in whole, by each taxing body due to the development; b.Proposed covenants,conditions and restrictions and/or homeowner association bylaws. c. Environmental analysis or study, prepared by an environmental specialist, which analyzes the major impacts the Planned Unit Development may have on the environment including, but not limited to,the effects on discrete ecosystems,deteriorated air quality in the immediate vicinity and along arterial and collector roadways leading to the Planned Unit Development from a specified distance determined by the City Engineer or consultant; any deterioration in the groundwater or surface water quality; effect on sensitive land areas such as floodplains,wetlands, forests, aquifer recharge areas,historic buildings or structures,prairie landscapes,and mineral resource reserves. d. Market study indicating the extent of market demand for the uses proposed in the Planned Unit Development including an analysis of demographics, sales potentials, competitive alignment, an assessment of the market share or opportunity gaps, and marketing positioning of each component of the Planned Unit Development. C. Plan Council Review: Upon receipt of all the required submittals, the clerk's office shall distribute copies of the application and supporting documentation to members of the Plan Council. The Plan Council shall review the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation and make a recommendation to the Plan Commission as to the proposal's compatibility with the city's planning objectives, transportation plan,recreation master plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision control ordinance,annexation agreement,and other goals and policies for developing the city. D. Plan Commission Review: The Plan Commission shall conduct a public hearing in accordance with Illinois Compiled Statutes. After the close of the public hearing, the Plan Commission shall recommend to the City Council approval or denial of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. The recommendation may include conditions of approval intended to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. 1. When applicable for the Park Board to review the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation, the Park Board shall have a representative present at the Plan Commission public hearing meeting for input and recommendation to the City 83 Council. The recommendations may include conditions of approval intended to be incorporated into final plans and supporting documentation. 2. As part of the Park Board representative's review of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat and supporting documentation, consideration shall be given to the following standards: a. Compatibility of the proposal with the recreation master plan and park development standards. b. Layout and organization of the open space system. c. Compliance with the city's land-cash ordinance for parks. E. City Council Review: Subsequent to receiving the Plan Commission and Park Board recommendations, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing and shall approve or deny the application for the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plat. 10-13-8: FINAL PUD PLAT: A. Purpose: A Final Plat for the Planned Unit Development, suitable for recording with the Kendall County Recorder of Deeds, shall be prepared by the petitioner for consideration and approval by the city. The purpose of the Final PUD Plat submission is to designate and depict with particularity the land subdivided into lots,whether conventional or otherwise, common open space and building areas. The Final Plat shall also designate and limit the specific internal uses of buildings, structures, and uses of land, as well as provide any additional information or details required by the City Council when approving the Final PUD Plat. B. Procedure: Not less than forty five (45) days before the Plan Commission meeting,the applicant shall file an application with the Clerk's Office for Final Planned Unit Development Plat approval. The applicant shall submit twenty (20) paper copies folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope and two (2) electronic copies of the following documentation: 1. A completed notarized application form,two(2)originals and the remainder photocopies. 2. The application shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fees. 3. Final Planned Unit Development Plat. The plat shall be a detailed plan which includes, at a minimum,the following information: a) An accurate legal description of the entire area under the immediate development within the Planned Unit Development. b) A subdivision plat of all subdivided lands in the same form and meeting all the requirements of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance and Municipal Code. c) An accurate legal description of each separate unsubdivided use area, including common open space. d) Designation of exact location of all buildings to be constructed, and a designation of the specific internal uses to which each building shall be put,including construction details. 84 e) Illustrate center line elevations, pavement type, curbs, gutters, culverts, etc., and a proposed street numbering designation shall also be furnished for each building. f) Construction plans detailing the design, construction or installation of site amenities; including buildings, landscaping, storm water detention facilities and other site improvements. g) Certificates, seals, and signatures required for the dedication of land and recording of the document. h) Tabulations on each separate unsubdivided use area, including land area, number of buildings,and number of dwelling units per acre. i) Construction schedule—A final construction schedule indicating: i. Stages in which the project will be built, with emphasis on area, density, use of public facilities,and open space to be developed with each stage. ii. Each stage as a separate unit. The unit shall be described and mapped on the project. Overall design of each unit shall be shown on the plan and through supporting graphic materials. iii. Dates for beginning and completion of each stage. 4. Common Open Space Documents: All common open space, at the discretion of the City Council, shall be: a) Conveyed to a city or public corporation, or conveyed to a not-for-profit corporation or entity established for the purpose of benefitting the owners and residents of the Planned Unit Development or adjoining property owners of any one or more of them. All lands conveyed hereunder shall be subject to the right of the grantee or grantees to enforce maintenance and improvement of the common open space;or b) Guaranteed by a restrictive covenant describing the open space and its maintenance and improvement, running with the land for the benefit of residents of the Planned Unit Development or adjoining property owners and/or both. c) Such documents shall also provide that the city shall have the right, but not the obligation, to perform necessary maintenance of the common open space, and shall have the authority to place a lien against the individually-owned property in the Planned Unit Development for the costs thereof. 5. Public and Quasi-Public Facilities — Guarantee of Performance: All public and quasi-public facilities and improvements made necessary as a result of the Planned Unit Development, including but not limited to,parks, schools,recreational areas, etc., shall guarantee the completion of such, as set forth in the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance, except where varied by the approved Final Plat. 6. Final covenants,conditions and restrictions and/or homeowner association bylaws. 7. Delinquent Taxes — A certificate shall be furnished from the County Tax Collector that no delinquent taxes exist and that all special assessments constituting a lien on the whole,or any part, of the property of the Planned Unit Development have been paid. 85 10-13-9: AMENDMENTS OR MINOR REVISIONS TO PUD: After the approval of the Final Planned Unit Development Plat, the use of land, construction, location of buildings and structures in the Planned Unit Development shall be developed in accordance with such approved plans,rather than by any other provisions of the zoning ordinance. Any changes,modifications or alterations to the approved Final Planned Unit Development Plat shall be considered either a minor or a major modification. 1. No changes may be made to the approved Final Planned Unit Development Plat unless approved by the city. The nature of the requested change, either minor or major, to the Planned Unit Development will be determined by the City Administrator,or designee,as follows: A. Minor Changes: Minor changes to the Final PUD Plat are modifications or revisions that do not alter the overall intent of the PUD. Minor changes may be approved by the City Administrator, or designee if the proposed modification does not result in any of the following: i. An increase or decrease in overall density greater than five percent(5%). ii. An increase or decrease in the mixture of residential dwelling unit types greater than five percent(5%). iii. An increase or decrease in area for any land use or land use mixture greater than five percent(5%). iv. An increase or decrease in total number of parking spaces greater than five percent (5%). v. Any reduction in area of common open space, landscaping or buffering, particularly when reduced below the minimum standard prescribed in Section 10-13-11: Development Standards and Design Criteria. vi. Any significant changes in building layout,orientation or height of buildings. vii. A change in the functional classification of a roadway. Minor changes not approved by the City Administrator may be appealed by the applicant or property owner to the City Council without review and recommendation by the Plan Commission with input from the Park Board representative (if applicable), unless the City Council refers the request for a minor change to the Plan Commission for review and recommendation. B. Major Changes: Major changes to the Final PUD Plat are modifications which alter the concept or intent of the approved PUD exceeding the criteria set forth constituting a minor change. Major changes to the Final PUD Plat shall be subject to review and recommendation by the Plan Commission with input from the Park Board representative (when applicable) with final approval or denial determined by the City Council. C. Application for PUD Modification or Changes: For any modifications or changes resulting in an amendment to an approved Final PUD Plat, the applicant shall submit a revised plat and supporting data with an application for a major or minor change to the Clerk's Office in accordance with the following: i. The title of the plat shall indicate the nature of the change. ii. If a major change, the revised plat and supporting data with an application shall be submitted to the Clerk's Office not less than forty five (45) days before the Plan Commission meeting. 86 D. Notice for Major Changes to PUD Plat: The notice for a major change to an approved Final PUD Plat shall conform to the requirements of Section 10-4-10:Amendments of this Title. E. All approved major or minor changes to an approved Final PUD Plat shall be recorded with the County and shall be binding on the applicants, their successors, grantees and assigns and shall govern the development of the PUD,as set forth therein. 10-13-10: CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL: The Plan Commission may recommend approval of a Special Use for Planned Unit Development or amendments to the Preliminary or Final Planned Unit Development Plat for the proposed development or amendment upon considering the following: 1. In what respect does the design of the Planned Unit Development meet the requirements and design standards of the development standards and design criteria, 2. The extent to which the proposed plan deviates and/or requires waivers of the bulk regulations in the zoning ordinance and how the modifications in design standards from the subdivision control regulations fulfill the intent of those regulations. 3. The extent of public benefit produced by the Planned Unit Development, such as but not limited to, the adequacy of common open space and/or public recreational facilities provided; sufficient control over vehicular traffic; provision of public services; provision and protection of the reasonable enjoyment of the land. 4. The relationship and compatibility,beneficial or adverse, of the Planned Unit Development to the adjacent properties and nearby land uses. 5. The extent to which the Planned Unit Development fulfills the objectives of the future planning objectives or other planning policies of the City. 6. The Plan Commission finds that the Planned Unit Development satisfactorily meets the standards for Special Use as defined in Section 10-4-9 of this Title. 10-13-11: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN CRITERIA: A. Purpose: The purpose of this section is to establish and provide a comprehensive set of standards and guidelines in which Planned Unit Developments are designed. While specific recommendations for development and design are provided, flexibility is also encouraged through guidelines which enable individual developments to be distinct from one another while maintaining the inherent character of the city. B. Applicability: These standards and established criteria shall apply to all newly constructed buildings and sites within a Planned Unit Development. Each proposed development will be evaluated on its compliance with the established regulations/guidelines contained herein. C. Density: The density,minimum lot size and minimum setback dimension for each use proposed within a PUD shall be determined by the conventional zoning classification which would permit the proposed use unless a variance is specifically requested as part of the Special Use request. D. Use Regulations: Planned Unit Developments may be comprised of a single-type of land use or a mixture of land uses when applicable and when different intensity of land uses are appropriately buffered or separated. 87 1. Uses proposed shall be consistent with those listed as allowable uses in the respective zoning districts. 2. Uses listed as special uses in the zoning district in which the development is located may be allowed. E. The Plan Commission may recommend and the City Council may approve access to a dwelling by a driveway or pedestrian walk easement. Off street parking facilities for such dwelling shall be located not more than two hundred feet(200')from the dwelling served. F. The Plan Commission also may recommend and the City Council may approve yards of lesser widths or depths than required for permitted uses in the zoning classification which the planned development is including,provided: a. Those protective covenants are recorded with perpetual access easements and off street parking spaces for use by the residents of the dwellings served. b. That spacing between buildings shall be consistent with the application of recognized site planning principles for securing a unified development and that due consideration is given to the openness normally afforded by intervening streets and alleys. c. The yards for principal buildings along the periphery of the development shall be not less in width or depth than required for permitted uses in the district in which the planned unit development is included and the plan is developed to afford adequate protection to neighboring properties, i.e. fire protection and sufficient area needed for utility easements, as recommended by the Plan Commission and approved by the City Council. G. Design Criteria: All standards of the United City of Yorkville Design Guidelines (Ord. 2009-28) and the Section 7.00 Design Standards of the United City of Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance's shall apply to all Planned Unit Developments. 10-13-12: FEES: The City Council shall establish a schedule of fees, charges and expenses for occupancy permits, appeals, applications and amendments for special use, and other matters pertaining to this chapter. The schedule of fees shall be filed in the clerk's office and may be altered or amended only by the City Council. Until all applicable fees, charges and expenses have been paid in full,no action shall be taken on any application or appeal. (Ord.2006-40,5-23-2006) 10-13-13: SEVERABILITY: Each section,clause and provision of this chapter shall be considered as separable,and the invalidity of one or more shall not have any effect upon the validity of other sections, clauses or provisions on this chapter. (Ord.2006-40,5-23-2006) 10-13-14: EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: A. The planned unit development shall be constructed in a timely manner. The planned unit development shall be subject to revocation under the following conditions: 88 1. Final Plat approval does not occur within twelve(12)months from the date of approval of the preliminary plat of a planned unit development. 2. Construction does not commence and proceed within three(3)years from the date of approval of the Final Plat of a Planned Unit Development. 3. The City Council may extend the time limits for Final Plat approval for no more than two(2) 12- month periods.Commencement for construction may also be extended by the City Council in one (1)year increments. B. The City Council may initiate or the owner of the parcel of land on which the Planned Unit Development is to be constructed may apply for the revocation of the Planned Unit Development. The owner shall be notified, in writing, at least thirty(30)days prior to the City Council's consideration of the revocation if initiated by the City Council. C. The City Council shall consider, but not be limited to, the following standards in the review of the status of the project construction to determine whether there is reasonable cause for delay: a. The original program of development with regard to market demand for the components included in the final plan; b. Conditions in the real estate finance market; c. General economic conditions in the local area,state or region; d. The ability and purposefulness of development operations for the Planned Unit Development; and e. Laws, ordinances or other regulations that may have affected timely development of the project. D. Upon consideration of the findings by the City Council regarding the standards in Subsection 10-13- 14C,the City Council shall decide whether: a. To revoke those portions of the Planned Unit Development for which construction has not begun; b. To extend the time allotted for construction to commence based upon a revised schedule of construction,or c. To require special changes in the Planned Unit Development as a condition of a time extension, whereby such changes shall be deemed a"major change"to the Planned Unit Development. E. Upon revocation of a Planned Unit Development, the parcel of land shall conform to the permitted uses and other regulations of the underlying zoning district of which it is a Special Use unless an amendment or other Special Use is initiated by the City Council or is applied for by the owner of the parcel of land on which the Planned Unit Development was to be constructed and granted by the City Council. 89 10-13-15: EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effective immediately after passage, approval and publication in book form according to law,and its regulations shall be in effect except where a Final Plat for Planned Unit Development has been approved and building permit issued prior to the enactment of this ordinance, and further providing that substantial change of position, expenditures or incurrence of obligations by or on behalf of the applicant of such approval or building permit would occur as a result of compliance with the ordinance. Applications for Concept PUD Plan Review, or amendments to approved Preliminary PUD Plat or Final PUD Plat under the former Planned Unit Development (Ord. 2006-40, 5-23-2006) shall automatically become null and void by the enactment of this ordinance, unless acted upon prior to the enactment of this ordinance. 90 ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ NB #6 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Tracking Number W City Administrator ■ °°°�^o O Consultant Cea, ❑ Ke da vs—ty EDC 2011-16 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Foreclosure Update for March and April 2011 Meeting and Date: EDC /May 3, 2011 Synopsis: Report of ongoing activities related to foreclosures in Yorkville for 2010. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: n/a Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: None Council Action Requested: No action/Informational Item Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memo. Memorandum ESL X836 „0. -� To: Economic Development Committee O From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director °Ac. � CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator CLE '►�"� Date: April 26, 2011 Subject: Foreclosure Update—March & April 2011 Attached are the monthly foreclosure reports for March and April 2011 provided by the Yorkville Economic Development Corporation (YEDC) for the cities of Yorkville, Plano, Oswego and Montgomery in Kendall County, Illinois. The reports list the number of foreclosures during various stages in the process including pre-foreclosure, bank-owned and auctioned properties for the City of Yorkville since the beginning of the calendar year (refer to highlighted columns in the table below). The number of auctioned and pre-foreclosure properties fell slightly in March and April since the beginning of the calendar year. However, the most notable decline was observed in the number of bank-owned properties in Yorkville during these past few months, with an average decrease of nearly 3% since January. Based upon these figures, it appears the housing market is showing signs of stabilization as the number of foreclosed properties level off, with an overall decline of about 8% during the 1"quarter of 2011. Table 1.Yorkville,IL Foreclosures Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Auction 48 48 38 38 Bank-Owned 414 400 384 383 Pre-Foreclosures 296 292 280 282 TOTAL 758 740 702 703 Data Source:Yorkville Economic Development Corporation 450 400 350 300 250 ❑Auction 200 ❑Bank-Owned 150 ❑Pre-Foreclosure 100 50 0 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 Kendall County, IL Foreclosures April 18, 2011 1 Auction I Bank Owned I Pre-foreclosures Yorkville (60560) 38 384 280 Plano (60545) 25 133 227 Oswego (60543) 45 177 336 Montgomery (60538) 64 145 351 Kendall County, IL Foreclosures April 26, 2011 Auction I Bank Owned I Pre-foreclosures Yorkville (60560) 38 383 282 Plano (60545) 23 136 231 Oswego (60543) 44 176 347 Montgomery (60538) 61 146 355 ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ NB #7 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Agenda Item Tracking Number City Administrator ■ °°°�^o O Consultant Cea, ❑ Ke da vs—ty EDC 2011-17 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: 801 N. Bridge Street -Request for relief from an existing Landscape Plan Covenant Meeting& Date: EDC /May 3, 2011 Synopsis: Request for administrative relief from an existing Landscape Plan Installation Covenant as a result of front yard acquisition by IDOT for the widening of IL Route 47. Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 8/24/04 Action Taken: Approval of Ord. No. 2004-48 Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/A Action Requested: Informational Item Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memorandum. •'��`° crr� Memorandum r To: Economic Development Committee EST. 1836 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director z CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator �dg ,�� Date: April 26, 2011 CIE '►1" Subject: 801 N. Bridge Street—Request for relief from an existing Landscape Plan Covenant for Travel Services of Yorkville,Inc. Background In 2004, the property located at 801 N. Bridge Street (IL Route 47) was rezoned from R-2 One Family Residence District to B-2 General Business District to accommodate the conversion of the existing single-family home into an office for a travel agency, Travel Services of Yorkville. As part of the rezoning, the City entered into a Development Agreement with the owner of the business, Cara Behrens, which required among other provisions, the installation of landscape improvements and buffering since the property is adjacent to IL Route 47 (refer to attached Ord. No. 2004-48). Subsequent to the Development Agreement, the City recorded a Landscape Plan Installation Covenant in Kendall County requiring the owner to plant parkway, perimeter and interior lot landscaping on the property in conformance with the City's Landscape Ordinance at that time (see attached). As required, the property currently has a variety of shade trees, evergreens and shrubs planted within the parkway along the frontage adjacent to IL Route 47 and near an existing septic field located in the front yard of the property. At the time of the original landscape material installation in 2005, there was a cognizant effort not to plant within the septic area due to the possibility of tree roots causing damage to the septic field. Request Since this time, the Illinois Department of Transportation has moved forward with its plans to widen 11 Route 47 and acquire land from property owners adjacent to the road for increased right- of-way. According to IDOT's Plat of Highway's plan, an approximately 25-foot wide strip of frontage along the subject property, inclusive of the existing landscaping, will need to be acquired for new the right-of-way. As a result from this taking by IDOT, the remaining area left within the front yard of the property is the existing septic field and is not conducive for plant materials. The property owner is seeking written confirmation from the City to provide to IDOT that, due to the constraints of the remainder area in the front yard, they are not required to replant any of the existing landscape within this area or elsewhere on the property. Staff Comments/Recommendation The city attorney and staff have reviewed both the Development Agreement and Landscape Plan Installation Covenant pertaining to the subject property. We are in agreement that relief from the replanting the existing landscaping that will be removed due to the widening of IL Route 47 can be granted administratively; as the landscape covenant only required the installation of the plant materials, but did not include a provision for maintenance or replacement. Staff asks that the EDC review and provide feedback regarding the attached letter which will be signed by the City Administrator and provided to IDOT. United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST. --1 ` 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 -4 Telephone: 630-553-4350 0 Fax: 630-553-7575 <CE May 4, 2011 Mr. Steve Andrews Illinois Department of Transportation Land Acquisition Engineer 700 E. Norris Drive Ottawa, Illinois 61350 RE: 801 N. Bridge Street—Travel Services of Yorkville, Inc. Dear Mr. Andrews: The United City of Yorkville acknowledges that on November 19, 2004 a Landscape Plan Installation Covenant was entered between the city and the property owner of 801 N. Bridge Street, Cara Behrens, requiring that certain landscape materials be planted along the frontage of the property adjacent to Illinois Route 47. We are also aware that, due to the Illinois Department of Transportation's need to acquire additional right-of-way for the pending widening of Illinois Route 47, the existing landscape previously installed will need to be removed as part of the construction with limited land area remaining for replanting. Therefore, please let this letter serve as confirmation that the United City of Yorkville will not require the replacement of the existing landscape material located within the front yard of 801 N. Bridge Street that will be removed as part of IDOT's acquisition and reconstruction project for Illinois Route 47. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at 630-553-8537 or the Community Development Director, Krysti Barksdale- Noble, at 630-553-8573 or knoblekyorkville.il.us. Sincerely, Bart Olson City Administrator Cc: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Cara Behrens, Travel Services of Yorkville, Inc. MAR-23-2011 08:45A FROM:TRAVEL SERVICES 16305532565 T0:16305534377 P.2 3/23/11 To: Eric Dhuse/City of Yorkville Public Works Hi Eric- Per our conversation, March 21, 2011 attached is the letter I have received from the Sewer Contractor in regards to my 801 N Bridge St., Yorkville property, As stated, to plant the trees/bushes as currently we have, would not work for the set up for the septic. I would like to get something in writing from the City that we will not be required to replant any of this after the project completion of Rt 47 as where I am being asked to move things will be right in the septic field. I would then pass this along to the State for their records as wel L Thank you for your help in forwarding this to Joe Wywrot. Please contact me if you should have any questions. Cara Behrens cell fax RRR-23-2011 08:45A FROM:TRAVEL SERVICES 16305532565 TD:16305534377 P.3 MAR-i5-2011 W 31A FROM: T0:16305532565 P:1-11 LLD.B ACKHOE SFAVICE, LLC P.O. Box 158 Yorkville,E 60560 Tel(630)553-7204 Fax(630)553-1810 3115111 Cara Behrens 801 N Bridge Street YorkvilEe,1160560 Re: 901 N Bridge Sbvc&Yorkville To Whom It May Concern: After locating the septic area at 801 N Bridge Street and&=minning the septic area needed for the Travel Services busims,I have coma up with the fallowing information. If the state takes no more land.than what was staked out,there still will be(3)times the septic arm needed rtmaming. One hundred eighty(180)square foot is required by state code for the travel business. There will be five 1'andred forty(540)square foot nmainirAg. I would reoommand a scow fence be ftL%Wled at the area staked by err state to pmteat the rem4aing five hundred forty(540)field from being driven on. I aeoWd also suggest that no trees or bushes be planted in the re mah ing septic area because of tree roots and equipttnent that can cause damage to the 5epdo field. If septic field.is damaged,to install city sewer would range in*a area of twenty flmsand(20,000)is thirty thousand (30,000)dollars, There is no ease or sewer avtalable wiftut gang thmugh subdivision to the south of Apple Tree Court. If you have any questions,please call Bob Davidson at 1630-553-7204. sincerely, v Robert E Davidson,d Il Septic Lice=m# 9-002199 20 3t IIn 2 0`! Filed Far Record in KENDALL GOUNTYr ILLINOIS STATE OF ILLINOIS PAUL ANDERSON 04-07-200 At 01:28 am. ss ORDINANCE 40.00 COUNTY OF KENDALL ) ORDINANCE NO. 2004-_�L% AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OF CARA BEHRENS (TRAVEL SERVICES OF YORKVILLE, INC.) WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,Kendall County, Illinois, that a certain Development Agreement pertaining to the development of the real estate described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof entered into by the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE; and WHEREAS, said Development Agreement has been drafted and has been considered by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the legal owners of record of the territory which is the subject of said Agreement are ready, willing and able to enter into said Agreement and to perform the obligations as required hereunder; and WHEREAS, the statutory procedures provided in 65 ILCS 5111-15.1-1, as amended, for the execution of said Development Agreement has been fully complied with; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNTIED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1: That the Mayor and City Clerk are herewith authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the City, a Development Agreement concerning the development of the real estate described therein, a copy of which Development Agreement is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. WANDA OHARE JOSEPH BESCO 4- VALERIE BURD PAUL JAMES LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS -4 — RICHARD STICKA 4 APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this '^day of , A.D. 20A�`. MAYOR PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this�day of Fltir• . A.D. 20 L . Attes Prepared by: CITY ERK Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge St. Yorkville, IL 60560 630.553.9500 2 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS. COUNTY OF KENDALL ) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR CARA BEHRENS (TRAVEL SERVICES OF YORKVILLE, INC.) Prepared by&Return to: Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge St. Yorkville, IL 60560 630.553.9500 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This Development Agreement, hereinafter referred as to "Agreement", is made and entered into this w�day of g + 2004, by and between CARA BEHRENS d16/a Travel Services of Yorkville, Inc. an Illinois Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "OWNER/DEVELOPER", and the United City of Yorkville, Illinois, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY". The OWNER/DEVELOPER and the CITY may hereinafter be referred to as the Parties. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the OWNER/DEVELOPER is the Owner of certain real property, hereinafter referred to as "Property", located in the CITY and legally described as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by references as if more fully set forth; and WHEREAS, the Property is located within the United City of Yorkville and is currently zoned R-2 One Family Residential District and is commonly known as 801 N. Bridge Street, Yorkville, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the OWNERIDEVELOPER has petitioned the CITY to rezone the property to B-2 General Business District; and WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that the terms and conditions set forth herein will serve a public use and will promote the health, safety,prosperity, security, and general welfare of the inhabitants and taxpayers of the CITY; and WHEREAS, the OWNER/DEVELOPER has informed the CITY that she intends to utilize the property as a retail travel agency; and WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER, their vendors, grantees, assigns, successors, trustees, and all others holding any interest now or in the future, agree and enter into this contract, which shall operate as a covenant running with the land and be binding upon any fixture owner or developer and their representatives; NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY and the DEVELOPER, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, do mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE I LANDSCAPE AND BUFFERING The OWNER/DEVELOPER agrees that she shall comply with and conform the landscape improvements for the subject property to the Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B", within one year of execution of this Agreement. In the event 2 that the adjoining land owner of the southern boundary of said property files a petition to rezoning the adjoining property to a business zoning classification with the United City of Yorkville within one year of execution of this Agreement, Petitioner shall not be required to comply with the landscaping depicted on the attached Site Plan, but shall be allowed to revise the landscape plan so long as it is in conformance with the United City of Yorkville Landscape Ordinance ARTICLE II PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT The Development of the Property shall be pursuant to the preliminary site plan approved by the United City of Yorkville which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit`B" which shall further contain all preliminary landscape requirements to be developed on site. In the event that OWNEWDEVELOPER or their heirs, successors and assigns desire to deviate from the site plan attached as Exhibit"B" approval from the United City of Yorkville City Council shall be obtained. That OWNER/DEVELOPER will be bound by any Architectural Overlay Ordinance or similar ordinance enacted by the CITY after the date of execution of this Agreement, so long as the same are applied to the surrounding properties with similar zoning classification in a nondiscriminatory manner. ARTICLE III PROPERTY USE The OWNER/DEVELOPER and CITY acknowledge that the Property is rezoned to B-2 General Business District, and any permitted uses as defined by the United City of Yorkville Zoning Code B-2 General Business District shall be allowable uses or1 the Property. ARTICLE IV EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date the date of execution by the parties. ARTICLE V MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS A. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their successors in interest, assignees, lessees, and upon any successor 3 municipal authorities of the CITY and successor municipalities and shall be enforceable according to its terms and conditions under the laws of the State of Illinois. B. The various parts, sections, and clauses of this Agreement are hereby declared to be severable. If any part, sentence, paragraph, section, or clause is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected thereby. C. All notices provided for herein shall be in writing and shall be deemed effective when personally delivered or three days after such notices have been mailed be certified or registered mail,postage-prepaid, return receipt requested, to the Parties at the addresses given below or at such other address as may be specified by written notice. If to OWNER/DEVELOPER: Cara Behrens 422 Fairhaven Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 It to the City: United City of Yorkville United City of Yorkville Attn: Daniel J. Kramer, City Attorney Attn: Tony Graff, City Administrator 1107A Bridge Street 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 IT WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement this 3,l s� day of 2004. United City of Yorkville, Illinois Arthur F. Prochaska, Jr., Mayor ATTEST: rk 4 OWNER/DEVELOPER: TRAVEL SERVICES OF YORKVILLE, INC. By: / Cara Behrens Cara Behrens 5 EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit"A" - Legal Description Exhibit "B" - Preliminary Site Plan&Preliminary Landscape Plan 6 it -�� - .y. .1," .. {]' ..{] . ''.•�i. '1, ffl!:- ,..:4. I.:1;�!3:',nl ': .A':�'' ''� if .M. .•T:: 14.:, :lie{..rr`• ..�i+ .i. ' 1 1"] .. 4 l 1= ,'l .. .fir• . :1 State of Illinois .s. + County of Kendall _��- • .. . . - This is tocertif , � •,.':" Y that� we, Donahue,' Thornhill - and Olson, Illinois Registered Land 5u'rveyors, have surveyed and located the 'improvements on that -art of[quarter of Section 28, Township 37 Ngrth;:.Range'.7_,East'-of the Third�PrinciraleMeridia�st F4.. rl described-as fo-11ows : "Commencing at�the•,southeast .corner of Lot 13 of said section as f P Plat•Book I. page .80; 'thence wei:terly along the south �'fline of s ,. . . , era plat ,thereof'ir, b lot, 400.75 'feet .to the centerline of.I'mirois State Route. ao: 47; thence w.?line asaid > ' said south line, being the north line of' A� Ple' Tree Courts , 200.0 feet; thence northerl 9 r- at right angles to said so;ath Tine, 102, 0 feet for a voint of beginning; thence soutbbrly ` along the last described course, 102,0 'feet to said- soutr south -'line, 200.0 feet to said center.�' line, thence- northerlvnalongQsaidecenteryline, to ald �:: • - a line drawn easterly; Parallel ' with said souti^�' •`` line, westerly along said parallel line,` 280,26 feet toth i h epoi7tcf~beginning eIn�the gCitreofe Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois as shown by the Plat hereon drawn which is a correct representation of said survey-and locatioi,. Dated at Yorkville, Illinois , May za, 1986 inois Registered Land Surveyor No. 2253 EXHi3T Cr , A�' k Morten/',00rpr - j No. 2625 _ S l F i I - �3.r----- --------------- — __—__�__ x ___—__----------------------------_—__�-------- -----------------°------ ---_--__— .. -- - --------- T,R �,• I f.�0° +� _ ! + e >r �.,re CAS �.Y"'1: '° "°—.tea s'-^�—� • ^77RR��FF --- 7B EY£R TREE i] t. 3 � -3Y DEC"iRE ! c I _ /•1 I +' ,�,U �'14'L ^_� ,L------------J 61,6F�� f � 1 ` >ti��~i-- •Y+'Y- /� - (r 1 J_J � '` ____ S+�_•_^_____ fFtl FSII F[r` C.Tr l •� Y4t. ; V '�. k' n ob r / EXIST BUILDING i,7-- `FF 638.54 1 EXIST GARAGE- & �EXIST E PTIC FIEL NO;MEHICLES F.,Qt11P"ENT LL BE ' 3y 11 cE` BREEZEWAY AREA �F REA�DVE 1 CDhrCRETE STEPS ALLO D ONTO SE'1 1C rl AREA. �` � Ri PROVIDE 1 PROP STEP AT cl iTRACTOR LL sinSTALLL ES:k T� FF = 637.61 GRADES SHOWN 1 f E TEAIi;ddiARY SNO r�ENLE OR FAGGING [ EXIST r: cur a LATERAL PIKE CAP \, AROUND 11 D AS S140 ` , i`xJ�x L r SHED a•5 8Zc PROP SIG, ILT FENCE ti � REMOVE AND REINSTALL BRICK OR i JTH LOT + x5T corn R-1a PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE WALKWAY .` 'Sf TO,A`REt10+EU AT ELEVATIONS SHAWN Iri H.C. SIGN e p ti t 3 5 UBS TO E F� gtr I st , ' 4.851 1rIAIN �f WALK C'WElf� i 6.Oj?".T 3 O I F r + AIL co S.OD1 { ! b� Y 1 E�.'Jna "• f' RELOCATE MAILBOX 10.i RAMP t NORTH AS SHOWN 18.001 L +,,�• 1B DEC 36 ' GEG tkEL .: �4 2"CU EE 10 E� RE{A04EC !+ r DEC !" SAWCUT EXISTING DRIVEW. CII ° S Aua P95T ;Vii,}+3+' 1 4�+ K. :•.,. REMAIN PROPO ED APPROACH f' "i .. m f. �� .,r•+, :', 717 9E REAID'JEC a '� os �tiya v RAZZ` •' TO LATCH EXSSTWG GRADES. REPLAC( CONCRETE APRON _ � �+ ! �� ExtST 9RIIX wx.k -G BE REUws'CC ' _ Idc WALK:. PROVIDE STOOP o q/ /AND A.D:/A RAMP WITH ,prL47 A + O,$.T=y1 06..HC R=u04E] RAIL AS.SHOWN. , 1627 r Zy ;bsti —.�.�.—.L � �.-�G38_ — — — — — — — — — EXIST UTI. 'Y POLE W/GUY WIRE / '-• '� `-� �i' ^r.-..-�+r-uw�[a. 7L.1 C ,JL.IT.[� _. ..- /f I .. _. _ - ' 1 REQUIRED EXISTING STILL NEEDED (or credit for existing) PARKWAY TREES (EAST L07 LINE) 3 SHADE TREES 0 SHADE TREES 3 SHADE TREES P1=RJMI=TER LANDSCAPE (EAST LDT LINT=) 2 SHADE TREES 1 SHADE TREES 1 SHADE TREES 2 EVERGREEN TREES 0 EVERGREEN TREES* 2 EVERGREEN TREES 40 SHRUBS 11 SHRUBS* 29 SHRUBS LOT LANDSCAPING (GENERAL) 3 SHADE TREES 4 SHADE TREES (1 shade tree) O EVERGREEN TREES 2 EVERGREEN TREES (2 evergreen trees) 0 ORNAMENTALS 3 ORNAMENTALS (3 ornamentals) 29 SHRUBS 34 SHRUBS (18 shrubs) * THIS COUNT DOES NOT II�CLUDE THE 4 EXIST EVERGREEN TREES & 5 EXIST SHRUBS ALDNG EAST LINE BEING REMOVED STILL NEEDED CREDIT FOR EXISTING PROPOSED INSTALLATION 4 SHADE TREES (1 shade tree) 2 SHADE TREES 2 EVERGREEN TREES (2 evergreen trees) 0 EVERGREEN TREES 0 ORNAMENTALS (3 ornamentals**) 0 ORNAMENTALS 29 SHRUBS (18 shrubs) 3 SHRUBS (1 required) ** count 3 ornamentals as 1 shade tree + 10 shrubs LANDSCAPING NOTES: ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MINIMUM STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF-NURSERYMEN. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE GROWN IN NURSERIES FROM THE CENTRAL OR NORTHERN ILLINOIS REGION.PLANT MATERIAL IS TO BE OF THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM SIZES: SHADE TREES: 2 � Dlf_ EVERGREENS : F HEIGHT SHRUBS : 24" ACCEPTABLE SPECIES ARE TO 13E UTILIZED AS LISTED IN THE"LANDSCAPE ORDJNANCE"OF THE CITY OF YORKVIII E, CURRENT FDITIDN. J r �J IIC150Ji_!CCU I j Flied for Recori .gin KENDALL PAUL �C kECtP-6tt tC 0 hi�, LECAL 200" At 10.23 nin. rOVENRNT3 ?f.0ra STATE OF ILLINOIS ) � 200600036300 Filed for Record in COUNTY OF KENDALL KENDALL COMM ILLINOIS PAUL ANDERSON 11-07-2006 At 01=43 an. COVENANTS 40.70 LANDSCAPE PLAN INSTALLATION COV RHSP Surcharse 10.00 WIMREAS, the undersigned, CARA BEHRENS and Trawl at,ylues of Yorkville, Inc, an Illinois Corporation(hereinafter referred to as "Owner/Developer'l, is the owner of the real property upon which is now situated an improved structure (hereinafter referred to as"Property"} described in the Exhibit"A",attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS,said Property, located at 801 N. Bridge Street,Yorkville, in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois,has been previously rezoned from R-2 One Family Residential District to B-2 General Business District; and WHEREAS, OWNER/DEVELOPER agrees that she shall comply with and conform the landscape improvements for the subject property to the Site Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit`B",within one year of execution of this Agreement. In the event that the adjoining land owner of the southern boundary of said property files a petition to rezoning the adjoining property to a business zoning classification with the United City of Yorkville within one year of execution of this Agreement,Petitioner shall not be required to comply with the landscaping depicted on the attached Site Plan, but shall be allowed to revise the landscape plan so long as it is in conformance with the United City of Yorkville Landscape Ordinance; and )kIMREAS, in the event that the adjoining land owner of the southern boundary of said property fails to file a petition to rezone the adjoining property to a business zoning classification with the United City of Yorkville within,one year of execution of this Agreement, the land owner of the property adjoining the southern boundary of said Property hereby consents to permit OWNER/DEVELOPER to install the planting materials depicted in the attached Exhibit`B" at the location depicted in the attached Exhibit"B"on the property owned by the land owner of the property adjoining the southern boundary of said property, NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned CARA BEHRENS and Travel Services of Yorkville,Inc. an Illinois Corporation, and , the property owner of the property adjoining 801 N.Bridge Street, Yorkville, Illinois on the South side of the subject property do herewith covenant and agree with the United City of Yorkville that, in consideration of the City issuing the final occupancy certificate and release of funds held in escrow by the City, that the undersigned, or his heirs, successors or assigns, shall agree to and incorporate the above recitals. This Covenant shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and shall be obligatory upon the undersigned Owners, and their heirs, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed thin Covenant this L-1-C day of 7x��P�� , 2004 OWNER/DEVELOPER: ADIOINING LANDOWNER CARA BEHRENS, Jndivi alJy WITNESS: .� TRAVEL SERVICES OF YORKVILLE, fNC. AN 7WITNESS.0 ORATION a r7kZ C.r�r APPROVED and ACCEPTED; UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Sv: Anton Graff, City dministrator LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEC 28-37-7 City of Yorkville,Kendall County, Illinois. RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NM FLAT FILE SW 1 14r SEC 28, 7 37 N, R 7 E, 3RD PM R'2534Tp m la3z.zs'] T'EMPALRY J i L- 7.097 m[233517 FA BENT LINE 'p. R.Tlfni {o f} APPLE TREE COURTS N 4310'kff'E A�j L1.K��.�7 I .CHOW. N 33-DnI., E K 39q 4 E �.� HOC 170 77.7!41 5.587m Rla.7]'1 L13FIORD•3 3jgy' 'Ei, 1C: T.081 m 123.25'7 PAfk� LOT 2 L{t F.91TS.121M7 r R.7 s1a J y A 9 Irej41 TO m 2 1 ,OWL". 1- 570.2 ml �<r'��4 rr •�. SJ1� R OR L4T t �L■T T/t I ti'ir } laa .t5J13wit-SY' i f, �i '� fEIIOtK1+f 2f1.'`f I STa 7E+48.7.0q� s SFA 23x999.165 [65.62'] • r6� ! C01091E•1 _ .MIT[111!!11'1 I 21-3}00!n Ci o 70 DPJ m l r Td 22w4eALm _ 3KC0105 �L[IE '. LDT 17 31CLOlO1 I +611.99'1 [65.fi1'7 .°4t,O40 m LT �+ STA 21+934.610 �` II , 1 5 56°09'117- 19000 m t7 _ $ '101 EE� LO7 1 1.082 m tJ3.13'7 6 1 s1A 23&QE�5IG [62.3197 \� [ w T T13P7 PROPOSM Am urE ; 1 ++ 17 .il-7 T;�pO,R,�L>' Poll 3d0009aTF 2 r y W I, 3f ; ice .3 1� STA a 4.y ,I "N . [55.711 ITAOD�P-_Gl`_ I1� 4 2L>SOO - j ]. m i:so'7 r * l A gl,`�rr-�t. +15.73'7 X330 2 \ ' i Jet J• s7pi[7 7; 53A 22�0�7.T15 i. Tfi"i AMA, CTO+-Tg7 I� N 1296'58 E -Ar146,ClU r1Y7 _ 517J700�KiSTa'p �. I ,17945 E II SAOR IS T •,T T,C�; 14.000 7-LI . O \ H+ 319139 1 � ' t 6,0p t7' [55_77•] .},r •e. �r __ �� _ [ss,srl ilYgp. [16434'7 STA 2 t�044T TA T 3,',14 17.0 4 r '_rf'- T = r .. •-• AA ` L�TA04�6 w iii+�F 1T L53• !r" w LIST J UI0110-S 70+M'Of"K \F -,7 �L 1P00 3KC0101TE �+T S Bb�O'3g' li �Ca1C1�=LL7�_4 LC•ILus w[23.40'] s r+4 ; ♦• POE CO101 I 9.565 m 131.361 • \ LE.ILwr Ta t4rll '] M 46 1f �p� p g s, ti,. ItJ l �.L• s„zJML;aopa ♦ \ \ G 71710 w[ �7S- 1 - - \ 7 73141 [ " 1 ~ r \ +b;A i ` �� ITADO in l T nr `• - - .AO w 9l4' ATLTIIE \ ��Q ♦ Y STA �g�p�p C55.Tr7 - g ITi►- - ,. .p�1', s�.:I:. \ -;,t •(1:.•yrl - 1�-•.E,'_ C €�. i'±`.. 1 .1!.x3[57 mYSlb7•] � ��' •�}' �iT.y e' ,. -,. +56.771 �r .. k s ii.'I•.I \ ` -�_'? r ..��r...►- 7 �_ '1-'..• .�/ \ - - - '. J.V SIA N-%5.OD _ _ _ r, !n T \ 17.0 Ow rT 21 Ora la.soo Lr } �, b4-- � � .i :.. STA p[+91].395 155.7!11 [60.703 �� L11T5 a-nGLjTll \, C� 4 i -1 - 3!«00 Ls'y '.a-I1F;LiTI C�,oiki• 5 41'E7'56"R \ t 3KCOO98 ) ` # I 1f lY 5 33Y1W�•1RF' •�1 % Lc+ 4,606 m 115AT'7 � \ m l T ' }. L{.60557 a[ITiSbT7 `r I _ r.i _ :!I:. �^--. 1W.76'1 1 -- s29638"N 3a.115 w[325.15'1 �_ - STA +9mJ.�T9'S L9T 51�7p .f * `„ r.'. ii .I.•,. •.x. " - - - --- f-� - - - ��_-2 �` _._�� - 1T„x00'771 gO�LINE' 1y5' ♦ h 114c, Q 326 ll'• ~' 4..227 272 m[69.1F31 `•il4 h">:• tF STA 7IW1&Y7i N Y 24'Ib•'. f ,,551• 3TA o4poT►�46 nAro^ EAIS _�--', /r•► lLJI�RI 12'1.'1 p4. u7 4 I CIYpr+T1•H 3>l353]"E STJL yy{{;'305.000 j r/ , �. }fir�� \\ - L_C1[+_p2�7.255 m�ftB4A2'7 „JI.MxS •LM m {L �+ `! ..*�S'.I m i S \ �F l L=216 BOT m C12�76'1 , 4103'�1I3Cbl3 \1r X15 I` �E1w R 4TU5'31•E f 15164 a I7A1401 tKl, 2 'r T'I�� / ��. �-r CHOW-L ]5 76317,-120.6[11'3 + w ------%- E LI�So�[6.pY] yl�,,,�!:�r�� •'�•�' + R1 �p�lee 1 94 r- N, , M ~ Lr' 344 m EII '. R�216.570 m[710.36'] .1Sir 791 a 175.-^f3.7. r •C[IRvC M0.1 " f31[MIO. Lt• ti �> �" 1J,343 ,a JI17sr� _� icDgzzoJ3MItpJ%/4t7 i$r45m[2136'1' t 13#sls0jit ter- = �-_- STA 21+90$,000,- /�` •y / �pyf I ♦ �' t� I -17.ODO m LT ,.�/ L'I°+A9��\ l•"31' i f'7 �; - S 56`+6120'.E _ -r�..��!� ter• y _ 1- h'OT `�,�, } .L rr, \\"p' � ��'~ Cam•N �'-'• &la]m[26.59'] POR lA00099TE•1 ♦4j�mT�1T0'- .-'' UC-31.M m[IZ? M 1�-y]]"1C �'. 11' - 1 ar •F 7e.' 1 VL*,j s6*sL0 4.902 w 4.33.64'7 � t,•^'"ib`'� / H=216.610 ar a t••• . -1 w .4!'Y ! }l1 SYA S a� try e� * � ,✓r cNDRn:s ta+o2'1c� 11 // s 6n��t [ 1 p3 �!61i. �p i 14•7{{ SLi'�' ter : t 3.j1 f .r '' _J IL T M T S�{wl.3i'1 Y3 Sir L=�:twi1' .� S.lieOO.sRT 6�- k .I: m I:,�c I ♦ .r. 0T "w. A i1�.N a13Y3T"E TSt.RY7 \ rr, Y /.r� ` ' '• I� STA ROp .,1 j.7., 7 .;42.90'+ CI=10Tr,i�l 31�E - T� + PROPO'6E0 ADM'LINE I 17+x21703 14L TfY1 mT.C4. '7 r +52.49] 11' , LC= 763 of 13214.61'] �,�tl N rZOF`1F 31CCOSOI l L•41.351 .q / ' . u JA I 1310Rp=h 3!1[x5`E / r r , sTA n+gTyrz45 r LC. 41.319 .(133.61'7 5 59`51']3" E \. Jl 1j' •--SJO"R �:.11,ST► 4�ir 7 I#L911 w 719 •'a, 13A77 n 142.9! 31 21.000 m R 56.90'] 10$ w 153.11'1 1 1 �1 - .'� t , f3,3L POB 3KC0102TE t p��161 R=�]6-61 m(t730,,6g617 '1' J t361.4f'1 5 T7'y7 f - - • Si6.�R0 m,PT00 L= 26361 m[x6.16`7 `. �,�JI 155.622�m[5l '] 7 ♦ - --- .. C rDRp=N 23ror16^ E j1 t T w MAT) �}.. LC. 26.215 m C6 1' �� *+ '•R�1p3,670.m C56d�21'7 3,7W�a�Id,M'j- '- .r 5 1�76�57•- � lJ. ,�' S�!z1+95ekTT1 L• 41.6?3 m[135. KIM I0.5G m 4.34.99.1 +�, R, �I1Z0.T5I // '�' } x [95.11'] CHORD- 5 ]7'45.04°• ,�T[ 1f�Ti -.g N 16�p•3$•�W ,LE ra 7-- ;. -- ., -s T, }�• JA r ,1 , LC:+x1.550 m [136.32'7 ,. t a-1FT e ;343.533 n 1333.11.3-�.'A,i,� ,.v: ulasSrn �3,+ r�' N 1336.57" E p�p�s Jl. 10.G65 1'+34;99.7' 13• '+ • STA 22+002.370 [52.497 1 lC. 76 Ti4JO4(1PD 6L`J B°r,:1 �� F 29.000 m Al 195.1+1] ` R.1 9r. 7, 11 �• , IS ,$: ', _ POO 3KCOLODTE - 1 .� 'rr• R� N 9696'20"M' 'tQI@�-M 190^ E 7r qw T '•�� 3KCd100 LOT I -19.551 m E63.16.7 ".IKOOlO2 LCs 33.734 r,r gPO.37'I - }t'IrJ-�' it"•167 m[34114'1 -F�LW �7� t, L "13179 4r illel�7 �pR�p sE gip,r1k s if l9i"4 7� �+'' ►ti'Y 6 t4MI9 J"`CNm"I S MIT 1.1173 . �r ��T �lxA��1l, LCY 473 w t1S930'] 1 y�! LC. 39231 w[ItItAr'1 yt Cp3, XMOL Srr r 3KCOO97} SZ�l1TIL 1 LOT LaT I.IRON.ROD, PO C1 olivik POC SKCCQtDT. [55371 POC 3KC 1007[. amm ML a PDX 3noloTTE N.[515+3'-J7"' �iTA ` _ •yap 07.POC 3K F0102TC A� 111 STA 36M F917 `VJ 9;A_.�1s910 LOO• LOT 3 T R-733AIO al s[fit- i1t Y 14F745'Inlltl 2.910 m E9.55'] PE IN'5 TOWNS NOME ADDITION E-IL990 K CHORD= 5 16'!x'5[^1 ,, YKGOd99 PC LTA 21N70290 Pon 31([00!! LC= 2.910,n[9.55'] !♦yg7 PT iA 7TM1TN`3Tf N 74T►T'477°��lt' gt; i .. �^PL III'CABINET y.51.0 •415AI , IGOOb w t1ti1 I 29 p�a1tc�'] l I°OB rit pap-TC 1 O 5 !0 IS 20 25 LERTIFYCATI OF SIIRYEY [0014 ? LOT 2 a:n a A•f rr, .•: »:.. ar=;,,, 1.,41.x.1 rill[ GRAPHIC SCALE INWET1EA5 [PON Pi E y _. __ -- - - - . '.. -- -- - -. - - .._ ..._.._. NDTFr BEARINGS ARE @ASED C1+14.4.16![35 STATE PLANE POC 3KC0D97.PO 3KC0O9T1 E. TOTAL AREA IN TEIdPORARY COORDINATE SYSTEV NAO 1993 •FAST 266E OWNER ROW Ex15TING REIAAINDER EASEEWLWT EASEMENT PURPOSE ILLINOIS DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION STATE OF ILLINOIS POC 3dDD099 PEt 3Kr0099TF P TOTAL REQUIRED ROADWAY REQUIRED 'COUNTY OF KENDALL .(rw96 ely 4x111 R,rYy ._..�-__.._. er-_ ___;_ _ _ .,C.i m': -1..7 rl 1 r.1-- '1❑ }r 5r F{'1,1�f{4.•h ir... .. - 1 79 ,r ,=, t= r :r." 1 : i', 11' •„In Nao71,; RIGHT OF {K/#Y SLAT J. TJ110THY C.OUIGO ►EREBY CERTIFY THAT J AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND - < t: arJ °: SURVEYOR OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. THAT THE SURVEY OF PROPOSED F.A.P. 1Ati 4 n + I et r. �AH!c1R.•r r.. irr ':. I:.5a r7 ?s:;4 5:x[. 1[3_ tuirt 326 (It. 473 WAS MADE BY LIE OR UNDER AlY DIRECTION AND THAT THE SURVEY f� ".�� nx r :.r,_^i :a4 " x.a I,I'i" ,lB -1•r - 15 TRUE ANO COMPLETE 4kS SHOWN TO Iles BEST OF MY KNONRFpGE AND BELIEF. ��. r . •15. tz,:_" t_ I I1'I.nsy •r7! _ 1: 17: v 1_ - 1*Ivl NiccH ROUTE FAP 326 i1L 4T) 7IU1T ALL g01AJ3alENT5 AJm MARK5 ARE OF THE 1131YJlACTER AND OCCUPY Th[ - :t sFtrxe' w�To-aR T,iva.- 1.5iy 7?•.. -L 1!1h "•r4. ::!mr: ill sr r.'. (:rill •si• ',f,t,i . SECTIOW 15tS. 13C. JOB. 1091R POSITION SIf01M YHERECN, AND ARE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE ` r aloe ae0� !,r,':•r. ;r[, !.rr -a, a I. I1;,3n '.r_!• i! s I_'•r rrr;=_I 1• ill,. =klut!r. h .req er - - 4 7 n7 :f,.: a COUNTY I NMALL RETRACED. r� nai�5 �'" 1!n` r , ,,� ^rrr.+.. .� .a y. - [•atvF v+rrYy I I 1 :+• r t l:,.t'4 'I':e 171•:.I�'�: 7•t r'1r JOB• R-93-014-94 PROJECT, OATEA mni :st 11x[7 1'A 11EIlflC ,-H iuE w s 5EC 28 T 3T H. R 7 E OF 30 P.M. 1111.1NO15 PROFESS16k LAW 566608 FOBABEii M A3 d7CLe6d CAPI�+ "' `�.`rr i,>,.•ri iaet:l ;�{.,o+ :fr, '<i r.r:''• 5 7 A 21+900.000 TO STA 22+075.000 $ SCALE SURVEY BOOK NOS. ]F}3ps{'9 �ti - ati sl : It250 MEET NO. 23 OF 36 f s',4h' I• 1,"h, L ier rh^-J'I, I PART OF THE SW 1/4 OF SEC 28, T 37 N, R 7 E, 3RD PM, CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS +0�/; ,3gi 9.186 m L 130.14.3 STA 22+038.135 17.00O-m LT C55.77'7 / 279'± PROPOSED ROW LINE 85.0 m± _ _ STA 22±016.576 (7.000 m LT [55.77'] , STA 22+051.537 S A�22+012'000 17.000 mLT 55.77'7 Rv'�,�► 130 HSE 1 ti , ` .. _a; ti 39.6 m- r .{ 410 102' S7A t2+010.0Qm± a 20.000 m L T 165.61 ]�, ,+ 19.6 m± [64'+7 *�� ,� ' rt- ' PROPOSED TEMPORARY ' EASEMENT LINE STA 22+011.970 ' +016.576 __PC 20G'± 1 9,17 m 6 LT [30.10'] 1.0 m� STA 21+599.165_ l 20.000 m LT [65.61'7 , +011.970 STA 22+000.115 Y 005.316 1 .000 m LT [55.77'7 9.1G9 in L T 130.08'] PARCEL NO KC BRETT A. BEHRENS , et ux TOTAL HOLDING 2,267 m' + 124,402 SFI± PREMISE PLAT OTAL ROW REQUIRED 671 m2 ± [7,223 SFI± EXISTING ROW 363 m2 ± [3,907 SFI± NET -RD ; 31,31( -5F Q 10 ;5 0 S REMAINDER 1,596 m? } [17,179 SFI± FAP 326 (IL RTE 47) GRAPHIC SCALE IN METERS TEMPORARY EASEMENT 36 M-2 ± 1412 SFI± SECTION (5CS,13C0108, 109)R SCALE 1 : 500 TE PURPOSE : DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION KENDALL COUNTY JOB NO R-93-014 -94 / ' ` / . 10 0 10 20 SCALE IN FEET EXIST BUILDING FF 636.10 BEFORE EXCAVATING PROVIDE 3 SHADE TREES AND 10 I NOTES ON SHEET 2 op 2 17 oi .op EXISTING P, WTH BASEMENT FF 638.54 �+T I..E EAST SE�T!C FIEL W141=5 C tOLIPMENT SE REMOVE exwm MI'll PROP S cc PLO ONTO gpTlc L ARCJL REMOVE 4 EXIST PIK EXI m" WADES TOWN BREEZEWAY AMA TTM P=Y OR PROVIDE 215 Lr-SLY FENCE 1 05 CUT OFF I AP LINES AS SHOVIN 1. ,, AND .7 SIGNAGE LOCATION E NEW WAY ALONG WEST SOUTH LO OWell 3 St RUBS ALK -w 10 q- tj 2) PROPERTY PIN AT SOUTWEAST CORNER OF SUBJECT PROPERTY. SAOWT EXISTING DRIVEWAY. EASM6 APPROACM PAVEMENT TO f TO MATCH EXISTING CRAMS. LEGEND PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXIST UTrLt7,P.q, /.y"RE --- ----biyl --- —PROVIDE 4 EVERGREEN TREES EXISTING STORk SEWER LOCATED AS SHOW PER NOTES RELOCATE VOICE,POLE UTILITY ON SHEET 2 MARKERS AS SHOWN TE 0 EAST SHRUSIS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE ALONG SOUTH LOT LINE EXISTING WATEAMAW AS SHOW EWSnNG OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EXISTING GAS SERVICE VA EXiSTING TELEPHONE PROPOSED CONIOUR LINE ------157T PROPOSED WATERRAIN PROPOSED SIORM SEWER NERIEW CEITFIFY THAT THESE FLAW KAW GEEN PIMPARED MOM krV FF 639.54 PROPOSED MT VENCE 11FAMOENT11 FtM UM E=MIVE USE OF THF CLIENT MUM HIRMcCIN. .6M.00 0351ING SPOT SHOT 411 3 E--> OKRLAND RELIEF Dictum OF UTILITY POLf 9 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT POLE W GAS VALVE ATE �0TES TEBRUGGEENGINlgaMi PREPARED FOW. 1PROJECT NO. 041 SHEET NO. � (em*DAM im GRADING AND LANSICAPING FOR PROPOSED PARKING LOT --_—_— -- —^__---- --- �� 3 242,02' _----^—_^--------------_------ -1— -- --------- 6�0 — jqc Lo 3 0s`7 ; ,, t rr t� � � � ! y F �'-a.. ��( , uy`I?�- •: ,�,5 [l O � ,- � � 3 �� 3.i.. -.maw t y �. sw i =�L...1-----------1----------- ;2 --------- --------' -- I — --------- 17 ' I y �q5 1 '••� .// { 1 / to ry . I TING S.F. Y BLDG SEM EN T 538.54 `� }�. y r4 ryCl f �•''7/d� lJ rfr , I EXIST S JPTIC FIEL I 5�9 - an° + �] �' � � � ~6�' 3 2 ~ Off• �+ NO VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT LL BE r REMOVE � CONCRETE S PS' x •� ' ROOFED: PROVIDE PROP STEP A ALLO ED ONTO TH SEPTIC FIE' , AREA- REMOVE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL 53'f ��' TREES 4 DPEN GRADES SHOWN 63 , PORCH I TEMgORARY SNOA:!FENCE OR FEAGGING •.') �. SHRUBS I CUT OFF LATEF Al_ PIPE & CAP AROUND FIELD AS SHOW C'r, PROP SIGNAGE Lc 3 . 'r � REMOVE AND REINSTALL BRICK OR � � � � � o ,, •° / /' �^� PROVIDE NEW CONORETE WALKWAY II ' •'I AT ELEVATIONS SH�WN LU ` L61 H.C. SI PN . {y, .jj'•,;,,� l 33' ' 3 SIlZUBS •7' � rJr'/r. ash r'-0' _•_�'Y 1 ' �� x TO,/F A I N 16,00' :�_' I I , `�•' c � -foJJ — ter—r.tr ^u_`l/CJ_'^-- — 'Yy` �, C7-4 Y l' J f. ri��t,° 1�5 h�� r ++ „ £ f�' 1'� �I -y5�'4Lj '•7'� .9�i'r rr .." •,• ' - , lo Avol SAWCUT EXISTING DRIVEWAY. I �' EXISTING APPROACH PAVEMENT TO ` ,f�.�,� • 24. f: u � . �, REMAIN.PROPOSED APPROACH PVMT �' _ : 'Z3. TO MATCH EXISTING GRADES. , •'s� 63