Loading...
Public Works Packet 2011 08-16-11 o United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST. '� 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 � i Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 KwMI Cou* �? SCE AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, August 16, 2011 6:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: July 19, 2011 Items Recommended for Consent Agenda: New Business: 1. PW 2011-53 Yield Signs — Sunnydell Lane and Greenfield Turn 2. PW 2011-54 Yield Signs — Country Hills Drive and Greenfield Turn 3. PW 2011-55 Windett Ridge Pedestrian Crossing Signs 4. PW 2011-56 Pavement Management Study Presentation Old Business: 1. PW 2011-47 Discussion and Update on the Flooding Issues in Sunflower Estates 2. PW 2011-48 Discussion and Update on Road Maintenance on Tommy Hughes Way and Saravanos Dr. 3. PW 2011-52 Windett Ridge Mowing Update 4. PW 2011-31 Kendall Marketplace Development/Infrastructure Update 5. PW 2011-43 Emerald Ash Borer Update Additional Business: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Tuesday, August 16, 2011 6:00 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. July 19, 2011 ❑ Approved ❑ As presented ❑ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2011-53 Yield Signs— Sunnydell Lane and Greenfield Turn ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2011-54 Yield Signs—Country Hills Drive and Greenfield Turn ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2011-55 Windett Ridge Pedestrian Crossing Signs ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. PW 2011-56 Pavement Management Study Presentation ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OLD BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2011-47 Discussion and Update on the Flooding Issues in Sunflower Estates ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2011-48 Discussion and Update on Road Maintenance on Tommy Hughes Way& Saravanos Dr. ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2011-52 Windett Ridge Recapture Payment and Mowing Proposal ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. PW 2011-31 Kendall Marketplace Development/Infrastructure Update ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. PW 2011-43 Emerald Ash Borer Update ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 i o J a T Legal ❑ Minutes Finance ❑ EST. 1 � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ °^Y `O Public Works ❑ dal Cou^ty El`E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the Public Works Committee—July 19, 2011 Meeting and Date: Public Works— 8/16/11 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Committee Approval Submitted by: Minute Taker Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING City Hall, Conference Room Tuesday, July 19, 2011 — 6:00 P.M. COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Alderman Diane Teeling Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Larry Kot A OTHERS CITY OFFICIALS PRESEN Bart Olson—City Administrator Eric Dhuse—Public Works Director Members of the Public Present: Citizen Comments: There were no citizen comments. This meeting was calf ~ rder at 6:04pm. The minutes for the June 21, 2011, meetings were unanimous �'` r`oved mended. Y4; New Business:V1 1. PW 2011 — 45 Discussion on Future Budgeting for Algaeside in Ponds throughout Yorkville In the City of Yorkville, there are about 160 wet and dry bottom storm water management basins, 17 of which are owned and maintained by the City. Of those 17, three are maintained using funds from an SSA (Sunflower Estates). Storm water management basins have to remain in the condition they were designed unless the change would be to improve the basin to include best management practices, such as naturalization. The Standard Specifications for Improvements include using Best Management Practices for storm water basin design. Ordinance #2009-78, Providing for the regulation of Post-Construction Implementation of Best Management Practices, established standards for design, construction and maintenance of storm water best management practices. Our Storm water Management Protection Plan also speaks to this requirement. The following examples illustrate the treatments and costs for different types of basins. 1 Each basin is unique and designed to meet a certain storm water capacity and flow, and is typically naturalized or has a mowed turf grass perimeter. 1) Sunflower SSA—to maintain three basins, $800 per application @ 3-4 applications per year ($2,400 - $3,200 annually; or $800 - $1,600 per basin annually); 2) The City stopped applying chemical treatments to our basins due to the budgetary constraints. An estimate for the Grennbrier pond would minimally cost $1,280 per year to treat with chemicals. 3) A naturalized basin, if not routinely maintained, can increase in cost to bring it back to an acceptable standard. Windett Ridge's basin was estimated at $15,530 of maintenance work in 2010. This would not continue to be an annual cost. 4) Raintree Village is a great example of a subdivision HOW managing their own naturalized basins. They received estimates and selected a contractor to maintain 3 basins every 3 years (they have 9 total). The HOW is spending $1,900 to maintain a single basin every 3 years, or 4633 annually per basin. The Committee discussed how the types of plantings and whether or not the ponds are wet are dry determines the need for treatment as well as the severity of the algae. It was noted that even though one pond is treated regularly it still has an algae problem. Additionally, is discussing Windett Ridge, it was noted that the developer was responsible for maintaining this basin, but went bankrupt, and then re-purchased the property under a different company name. Further, Alderman Gilson requested updated information on the cost to bring this basin up to standard, as the quote provided was a year old. It was noted that there is no money budgeted for treating or maintaining these basins. City Administrator Olson suggested that a potential solution would be a comprehensive citizen survey in order to determine if this is a priority of the community. Alderman Gilson stated that a survey was a great idea and suggested tabling this matter to Old Business. 2. PW 2011 —46 Discussion and Update on the Drainage Ditch near Adrian and Blaine Streets Staff has provided cost estimates to install a concrete spillway between the two pipes at the intersection of Blaine and Adrian Street. The total proposed estimate for the project is $1,165.60, $550 of which is for 2 materials (gravel base, concrete and landscaping), the remaining for employee labor. City Administrator Olson noted there were available funds from the Stormwater Account for the materials for the project. However, he also noted that the proposal does not coincide with Engineering Principals but it would not hurt to be completed. The Committee agreed to have staff complete the project. 3. PW 2011 — 47 Discussion and Update on the Flooding Issues in Sunflower Estates Staff provided a review of the project to date, including a summary of work completed, a summary of general storm water management design standards, summary of off-site and on-site drainage review, and the proposed next steps for the project. The Committee agreed "",,-have staff continue to gather information and move forward. At this time, the Committee agreed to discuss Item #8 next. 8. PW 2011 — 52 Windeltt Ridge Recapture Payment and Mowing Proposal The Committee discussed the fact that the developer was trying to negotiate with the City to provide mowing services as a means of decreasing the amount the recapture payment owed to the developer. The total amount of the recapture is $114,000. This item has not been forecasted for future budgets as the City will be negotiating which parcels to which this agreement applies. Another issue has to do with original owner and successor owners(s). City Administrator Olson noted that the successor developer is responsible for the maintenance of these lots and has been notified that they are not compliant. The issue is that the developer has no money, they are unable to pay to have the lots mowed, and they are trying to get the City to do it, by reducing the amount of the recapture. Unfortunately, there is a process that needs to play out and it could be sometime before the City would have the authority to mow the properties. Additionally, the City would then have the financial burden, even though the developer would have been fined. 3 The Committee agreed that it was unfortunate the properties could not be mowed right away, the process needed to move forward and the City move forward with ticketing. At this time, the Committee returned to the original agenda. 4. PW 2011 —48 Discussion and Update on Road Maintenance on Tommy Hughes Way and Saravanos Drive In October 2010, the Building Department sent violation notices to Sam Saravanos of Saravanos Propoerties, LLS (Stagecoach Crossing) and Mike Hughes regarding the potholes and deterioration of the pavement on Saravanos Drive and Tommy Hughes Way. In early November 2010, the Engineering Department was informed, and visually confirmed, that patching work had been done. Since that time, Building Department staff has been in contact with the property owners as recently as May 2011 and learned that the Stagecoach Crossing development has been turned over to First Midwest Bank. We also were informed by Mr. Hughes, that he has an agreement with the Circle K Shell station management which allows Circle K to use the paved area behind their facility (Tommy Hughes Way) as long as they maintain and make need repairs to the road. Staff has identified single as well as multiple potholes on the property and additionally, has provided to the current property owners with a violation notice regarding the condition of the roads. Specifically, Section 302.3 Sidewalk and Driveways, which states that "all sidewalks, walkways, stairs, driveways, parking spaces and similar areas shall be kept in a proper state of repair and maintained free frorn hazardous conditions". However, due to the general nature of the term "hazardous condition" this code provision may be difficult or problematic to prove if challenged. City Administrator Olson noted it was the City's understanding that the Saravanos property is in receivership and any improvements to the property would have to be approved by the court. It could be 30 to 45 days before any paving could be completed because nothing can be done until the bank takes the property over. Staff did note that the Line of Credit has been extended but there are still open items on the punchlist. Concerning the Hughes property, it is still owned by Hughes and they have been sent a letter telling them have 30 days to comply. As this is a private road, the City is not responsible for the potholes or any damage they may cause to vehicles. 4 5. PW 2011 — 49 Yield Signs at the Intersection of Dolph and State Streets Staff has investigated the possible installation of yield signs at the intersection of Dolph and State and found: 1. there currently is no signage control at the intersection; 2. the intersections to the north at Orange/State and Washington/State do currently have yield signs; these intersections do have sight distance issues due to trees nearby the intersections; 3. The intersection at Dolph and State is much more "open" than the two intersections to the north; 4. The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Staff review of this document determined that this intersection would appear to be border line for the need of yield signs. Alderman Gilson stated he asked for this item to be brought in front of the Public Works Committee due to resident complaints. The Committee agreed that though the road does not directly connect to Route 47, as the other intersections due, it would be consistent to install yield signs. This matter will be forwarded to the consent agenda. 6. PW 2011 — 50 Bid Results for 2011 MFT Miscellaneous Bituminous Patching Bids were received, opened and tabulated for miscellaneous bituminous patching at l Oam July 7th. Representatives of IDOT, the contractors bidding the project and our firm were in attendance. Two qualified contractors submitted acceptable proposals for completing the work. A tabulation of the two bids and the engineer's estimate is provided to the Committee. Staff recommends the acceptance of the bid and approval of award be made to the low bidder, Aurora Blacktop Inc., in the amount of $44, 273.90, which is approximately 11.2% under the Engineer's Estimate of$49,870.00. The Committee suggested staff look at other areas that could be patched in order utilize the available funding. It was noted that a change order would enable additional patching. The Committee recommended moving forward to the Consent agenda. 5 7. PW 2011 — 51 Water Department Reports for May and June 2011 The Committee accepted the reports and agreed to have them forwarded to the Consent Agenda. Old Business 1. PW 2011 —32 Saravanos LOC Call Update This item will be removed from Old Business. 2. PW 2011 —31 Kendall Marketplace Development/Infrastructure Update As requested, staff has investigated the status of the infrastructure on the commercial portion of the development. It is our understanding that the City is interested in knowing what it would take to "stabilize" the site. From the initial review of past correspondence, it would appear that the commercial punchlist is generally consistent with our findings. Upon review of the unfinished areas, we observed the undermining of some of the curb, areas of pavement stresses near future entrances and curb in disrepair. `8��88&a, e8888888888°' "058�88888�88a.. In addition to the site itself, it is staffs understanding that progress is being made on the proposed intersection improvements at Cannonball and Route 47. The improvement plans have been submitted to IDOT for final approval and the City is working on the land acquisition portion of the project. It is the City's understanding that this work is intended to be completed this fall. Staff stated they would provide a timeline at the next meeting. 3. PW 2011 — 43 Emerald Ash Borer Update Staff met with representatives of Arbor Jet, which is a company that makes a chemical to treat ash trees to make them resistant to the Emerald Ash Borer. Even if the borer is present in the tree, this product will not only drive them out, but will keep them out for 2 years with over a 90% effective rate. Utilizing data provided last month of the possible removal of 123 ash trees, if those same trees were treated at a cost of$75.00 per tree it would cost approximately $9,225 per year for chemical treatment. This does not include the cost of$1,200.00 for the injection kit nor does in include our time. This cost is substantially less 6 than the estimated cost of removal with the added bonus of keeping the trees. Additionally, to treat and save these trees for 5-10 years, which would be 2-5 treatments at a cost of approximately $18,450 - $46,125.00, the borer will more than likely have moved out of this area due to a lack ash trees to consume. The Committee discussed the fact that no money has been budgeted for this project however, there is $10,000 for tree removal, of which, $2,000 will be used to clean up from the last storm. The Committee agreed that this need to be done; however, recommendations for finding the money were needed. Alderman Kott stated the importance of letting the community know what was going on and why the City was removing these trees. Director Dhuse agreed and noted the importance of citizens treating or removing their own trees. 4. PW 2010— 82 Illinois Prevailing Wages Discussion This item was tabled to the next meeting. Additional Business Alderman Kott informed Director Dhuse of the destruction of a 47/34 sign in front of the Shell that had been hit. Director Dhuse stated that IDOT had been notified as had the sign shop. Alderman Kott then asked who should be notified after hours of debris in the road. Director Dhuse stated if the State did respond to debris in a state road, then he should be contacted directly. There be no further business, the Committee adjourned at 8:02. Minutes Respectfully Submitted by: Kristia RM Leyendecker Minute Taker 7 c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ NB #1 II Finance ❑ EST. , � 1836 Engineer ■ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑ K a ry . PW 2011-53 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Sunnydell and Greenfield Yield Signs Meeting and Date: Public Works—August 16, 2011 Synopsis: A request was made to install yield signs at the Sunnydell and Greenfield intersection. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Discussion Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff report. cip Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator EST. -� 1 836 From: Brad Sanderson, EEI o t�ilr� CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works � ® Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk <LE Date: August 11, 2011 Subject: Sunnydell and Greenfield Yield Sign As requested,we investigated the possible installation of yield signs at the intersection of Sunnydell and Greenfield. Our findings were as follows: • Currently there is no signage control at the crossing. • The intersection at Sunnydell and Greenfield does not appear to have any sight distance constraints and appears to be"open". • The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to yield sign installation: Guidance: Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered: A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches; B. Number and angle of approaches; C.Approach speeds; D. Sight distance available on each approach; and E. Reported crash experience. YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of- way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or C.An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist. A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary;and/or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way at the intersection under the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3 year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 year period The section highlighted above would appear to apply to our case. Since there are no sight distance constraints and there does not appear to be an accident history, this intersection does not appear to be a good candidate for yield signs. In addition,yield signs are typically not used to aid pedestrian crossings. A more appropriate approach to this intersection may be the use of crosswalks. However, in this case, the sidewalks have not been installed at all of the intersection leg's, therefore installation of the crosswalks are not appropriate at this time. We have attached an exhibit, noting the location of the intersection and the appropriate sections from the MUTCD. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. 2009 Edition Page 49 Table 213-1. Regulatory Sign and Plaque Sizes (Sheet 4 of 4) Sign Conventional Road Sign or Plaque Designation Section Single Multi- Expressway Freeway Minimum Oversized Lane Lane SUNDAY(and times) 810 20aP 28.53 24 x 18 24 x 18 (2 lines)(plaque) — — — — Crosswalk,Stop on Rsc1'� R10 6 5 X19 24 — — —. Push Button To Turn On 810-25 26.52 9 x 12 9 x 12 Warning Lights — — — — Left Turn Yield on fleshing}Red Aftt37 p R 10-27 213 , 30 x 36 `3t)X,% XX Vehicles Per Green R10-28 2B.56 24 x 30 24 x 30 — — — — XX Vehicles Per.Green Ri{i 29 2R 36 r 24 36 x 24 Each Lane _ — — Right Turn on Red Must Yield to U-Turn 810-30 26.54 30 x 36 30 x 36 — — —At Signal(plaque) R10-31P 5 ;: w24 x 9 24 Push Button for 2 Seconds for 810 32P 26.52 9 x 12 9 x 12 Extra Crossing Time — — — — K,P Off Median I R11-1 2B 57 .24 x 30 , 24 x 30 Road Closed RI 1-2 2B.58 48 x 30 48 x 30 — — — — Rohd Closed-Lo arc Only 911-3a,3b,4 213-58 62,X;IL) 60x 30 — Weight Limit R12-1,2 2B.59 24 x 30 24 x 30 36 x 48 — — 36 x 48 Ir1ie€ght t;irrti3 A42'.3's 28;59 t s ,t; '24 x 36 «, r Weight Limit R12-4 28.59 36 x 24 36 x 24 — — — — lt&ght Lif.6it ; R12-5 2B<69 24 x 96 _-X 3 36 x 48 Weigh Station R13-1 2B.60 72 x 54 72 x 54 96 x 72 120 x 90 — — Truck Route 814-1 26,61 24 x 18 24 x Its Hazardous Material R14-2,3 28.62 24 x 24 24 x 24 30 x 30 36 x 36 — 42 x 42 National Network 814-4;5 21�63 30 x 30 30 x w, 36x36 36x366 `_ 42x42, _< Fender Bender Move Vehicles R16-4 2B.65 36 x 24 36 x 24 48 x 36 60 x 48 — 48 x 36 Lights On When Using Afipers,or Raining R1f�'S,6 26.64 24 x 30 24 x 30 36x.48 48 x fi0 — 36X3 Turn On Headlights Next XX Miles R16-7 2B.64 48 x 15 48 x 15 72 x 24 96 x 30 — 72 x 24 Turn On,Check Headlights x{16.889 2B.64 30x IS , .,3 '5 48 x 24 Apo x 3[T;< — ?-4 Begin,End Daytime R16-10,11 2B.64 4815 15 48 x 15 72 x 24 96 x 30 — 72 x 24 Headlipht Section See Table 9B-1 for minimum size required for signs on bicycle facilities Notes: 1.Larger signs may be used when appropriate 2.Dimensions in inches are shown as width x height 07 Where side roads intersect a multi-lane street or highway that has a speed limit of 45 mph or higher, the minimum size of the STOP signs facing the side road approaches,even if the side road only has one approach lane,shall be 36 x 36 inches. 08 Where side roads intersect a multi-lane street or highway that has a speed limit of 40 MPH or lower,the minimum size of the STOP signs facing the side road approaches shall be as shown in the Single Lane or Multi-lane columns of Table 213-1 based on the number of approach lanes on the side street approach. Guidance: 09 The minimum sizes for regulatory signs facing traffic on exit and entrance ramps should be as shown in the column of Table 2B-1 that corresponds to the mainline roadway classification (Expressway or Freeway). If a minimum size is not provided in the Freeway column, the minimum size in the Expressway column should be used. If a minimum size is not provided in the Freeway or Expressway Column, the size in the Oversized column should be used. Section 2$.04 Right-Qf--Way at Intersec i s Support: 01 State or local laws written in accordance with the"Uniform Vehicle Code" (see Section ]AA 1) establish the right-of-way rule at intersections having no regulatory traffic control signs such that the driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection must yield the right-of-way to any vehicle or pedestrian already in the intersection. December 2009 Sect.2B.03 to 2B.04 Page 50 2009 Edition When two vehicles approach an intersection from different streets or highways at approximately the same time,the right-of-way rule requires the driver of the vehicle on the left to yield the right-of-way to the vehicle on the right. The right-of-way can be modified at through streets or highways by placing YIELD(RI-2) signs (see Sections 213.08 and 213.09) or STOP(RI-1)signs (see Sections 213.05 through 2B.07)on one or more approaches. Guidance: 02 Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered: A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches; B. Number and angle of approaches; C. Approach speeds; D. Sight distance available on each approach;and E. Reported crash experience. 03 YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street;and/or C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. 04 In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection.from all approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary;and/or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way at the intersection under the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. 05 YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. Support: 06 Section 213.07 contains provisions regarding the application of multi-way STOP control at an inter section. Guidance: 07 Once the decision has been made to control an intersection, the decision regarding the appropriate roadway to control should be based on engineering judgment. In most cases, the roadway carrying the lowest volume of traffic should be controlled. 08 A YIELD or STOP sign should not be installed on the higher volume roadway unless justified by an engineering study. Support: 09 The following are considerations that might influence the decision regarding the appropriate roadway upon which to install a YIELD or STOP sign where two roadways with relatively equal volumes and/or characteristics intersect: A. Controlling the direction that conflicts the most with established pedestrian crossing activity or school walking routes; B. Controlling the direction that has obscured vision,dips,or bumps that already require drivers to use lower operating speeds; and C. Controlling the direction that has the best sight distance from a controlled position to observe conflicting traffic. Standard: 10 Because the potential for conflicting commands could create driver confusion, YIELD or STOP signs shall not be used in conjunction with any traffic control signal operation,except in the following cases: A. If the signal indication for an approach is a flashing red at all times; B. If a minor street or driveway is located within or adjacent to the area controlled by the traffic control signal,but does not require separate traffic signal control because an extremely low potential for conflict exists; or C. If a channelized turn lane is separated from the adjacent travel lanes by an island and the channelized turn lane is not controlled by a traffic control signal. Sect.2B.04 December 2009 2009 Edition Page 53 Section 2B.08 YIELD Sign (R1-2), Standard: 01 The YIELD(R1-2) sign (see Figure 213-1)shall be a downward-pointing equilateral triangle with a wide red border and the legend YIELD in red on a white background. Support: 02 The YIELD sign assigns right-of-way to traffic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled by a YIELD sign need to slow down to a speed that is reasonable for the existing conditions or stop when necessary to avoid interfering with conflicting traffic. Section 2B.09 YIELD Sign Applications Option: 01 YIELD signs may be installed: A. On the approaches to a through street or highway where conditions are such that a full stop is not always required. B. At the second crossroad of a divided highway,where the median width at the intersection is 30 feet or greater. In this case,a STOP or YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the first roadway of a divided highway,and a YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the second roadway. C. For a channelized turn lane that is separated from the adjacent travel lanes by an island,even if the adjacent lanes at the intersection are controlled by a highway traffic control signal or by a STOP sign. D. At an intersection where a special problem exists and where engineering judgment indicates the problem to be susceptible to correction by the use of the YIELD sign. E. Facing the entering roadway for a merge-type movement if engineering judgment indicates that control is needed because acceleration geometry and/or sight distance is not adequate for merging traffic operation. Standard: 02 A YIELD (RI-2)sign shall be used to assign right-of-way at the entrance to a roundabout. YIELD signs at roundabouts shall be used to control the approach roadways and shall not be used to control the circulatory roadway. 03 Other than for all of the approaches to a roundabout,YIELD signs shall not be placed on all of the approaches to an intersection. Section 2B.10 STOP Sign or YIELD Sign Placement Standard: 01 The STOP or YIELD sign shall be installed on the near side of the intersection on the right-hand side of the approach to which it applies. When the STOP or YIELD sign is installed at this required location and the sign visibility is restricted,a Stop Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36) shall be installed in advance of the STOP sign or a Yield Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36)shall be installed in advance of the YIELD sign. 02 The STOP or YIELD sign shall be located as close as practical to the intersection it regulates,while optimizing its visibility to the road user it is intended to regulate. 03 STOP signs and YIELD signs shall not be mounted on the same post. 04 No items other-than inventory stickers,sign installation dates,and bar codes shall be affixed to the fronts of STOP or YIELD signs,and the placement of these items shall be in the border of the sign. 05 No items other than official traffic control signs,inventory stickers,sign installation dates, anti-vandalism stickers,and bar codes shall be mounted on the backs of STOP or YIELD signs. 06 No items other than retrorr-eflective strips(see Section 2A.21) or official traffic control signs shall be mounted on the fronts or backs of STOP or YIELD signs supports. Guidance: 07 STOP or YIELD signs should not be placed farther than 50 feet from the edge of the pavement of the intersected roadway(see Drawing F in Figure 2A-3). 08 A sign that is mounted back-to-back with a STOP or YIELD sign should stay within the edges of the STOP or YIELD sign. If necessary, the size of the STOP or YIELD sign should be increased so that any other sign installed back-to-back with a STOP or YIELD sign remains within the edges of the STOP or YIELD sign. Option: 09 Where drivers proceeding straight ahead must yield to traffic approaching from the opposite direction, such as at a one-lane bridge,a TO ONCOMING TRAFFIC (R1-2aP)plaque may be mounted below the YIELD sign. December 2009 Sect.213.08 to 2B.10 Page 54 2009 Edition Support: 10 Figure 2A-3 shows examples of some typical placements of STOP signs and YIELD signs. 11 Section 2A.16 contains additional information about separate and combined mounting of other signs with STOP or YIELD signs. Guidance: 12 Stop lines that are used to supplement a STOP sign should be located as described ir--- Section 3B.16. Yield lines that are used to supplement a YIELD sign should be located as described in Section 3B.16. 13 Where there is a marked crosswalk at the intersection, the STOP sign should be installed in advance of the crosswalk line nearest to the approaching traffic. 14 Except at roundabouts, where there is a marked crosswalk at the intersection, the YIELD sign should be installed in advance of the crosswalk line nearest to the approaching traffic. 15 Where two roads intersect at an acute angle, the STOP or YIELD sign should be positioned at an angle, or shielded, so that the legend is out of view of traffic to which it does not apply. 16 If a raised splitter island is available on the left-hand side of a multi-lane roundabout approach, an additional YIELD sign should be placed on the left-hand side of the approach. Option: 17 If a raised splitter island is available on the left-hand side of a single lane roundabout approach, an additional YIELD sign may be placed on the left-hand side of the approach. 18 At wide-throat intersections or where two or more approach lanes of traffic exist on the signed approach, observance of the right-of-way control may be improved by the installation of an additional STOP or YIELD sign on the left-hand side of the road and/or the use of a stop or yield line. At channelized intersections or at divided roadways separated by a median,the additional STOP or YIELD sign may be placed on a channelizing island or in the median. An additional STOP or YIELD sign may also be placed overhead facing the approach at the intersection to improve observance of the right-of-way control. Standard: 19 More than one STOP sign or more than one YIELD sign shall not be placed on the same support facing in the same direction. Option: 20 For a yield-controlled channelized right-turn movement onto a roadway without an acceleration lane and for an entrance ramp onto a freeway or expressway without an acceleration lane,a NO MERG., AREA (W4-5P) supplemental plaque(see Section 2C.40)may be mounted below a Yield Ahead (W3-2) sign and/or below a YIELD (R1-2) sign when engineering judgment indicates that road users would expect an acceleration lane to be present. Section 2B.11 Yield Here To Pedestrians Signs and Stop Here For Pedestl-i n� ig�s �R1-5 Series) Standard: 01 Yield Here To (Stop Here For)Pedestrians(R1-5,111-5a,111-5b,or 111-5c) signs (see Figure 213-2) shall be used if yield (stop) lines are used in advance of a marked crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach. The Stop Here for Pedestrians signs shall only be used where the law specifically requires that a driver must stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk. The legend STATE LAW may be displayed at the top of the 111-5,111-5a,111-5b,and R1-5c signs,if applicable. Guidance: 02 If yield(stop)lines and Yield Here To (Stop Here For)Pedestrians signs are used in advance of a crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach, they should be placed 20 to 50 feet in advance of the nearest crosswalk line(see Section.3B.16 and Figure 3B-17), and parking should be prohibited in the area between the yield(stop) line and the crosswalk. 03 Yield(stop) lines and Yield Here To(Stop Here For)Pedestrians signs should not be used in advance of crosswalks that cross an approach to or departure from a roundabout. Option: 04 Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs may be used in advance of a crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach to indicate to road users where to yield (stop) even if yield (stop) lines are not used. Sect.2B.10 to 2B.11 December 2009 Page 534 2009 Edition CHAPTER 513. REGULATORY SIGNS Section 513.01 Introduction Support: 01 The purpose of a regulatory sign is to inform highway users of traffic laws or regulations,and to indicate the applicability of legal requirements that would not otherwise be apparent. 02 The provisions for regulatory signs are contained in Chapter 213 and in other Sections of this Manual. Provisions for regulatory signs that are specific to low-volume roads are contained in this Chapter. Section 513.02 SJQP and YIELD Sig 111-1 and R1-22 Guidance: 01 STOP(RI-1)and YIELD(RI-2)signs(see Figure 5B-1)should be considered for use on low-volume roads where engineering judgment or study, consistent with the provisions of Sections 2B.04 to 2B.10, indicates that either of the following conditions applies: A. An intersection of a less-important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule might not be readily apparent. B. An intersection that has restricted sight distance for the prevailing vehicle speeds. Section 513.03 Shed Limit Signs (R2 Series) Standard: 01 If used,Speed Limit(112 series)signs (see Figure 513-1) shall display the speed limit established by law, ordinance,regulation,or as adopted by the authorized agency following an engineering study. The displayed speed limits shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 02 Speed limits shall be established in accordance with Section 213.13. Option: 03 Speed limit signs may be used on low-volume roads that carry traffic from,onto,or adjacent to higher-volume roads that have posted speed limits. Figure 513-1. Regulatory Signs on Low-Volume Roads SPEED DO PASS ! STO YIELD LIMIT NOT WITH PASS CARE R1-1 R1-2 R2-1 R4-1 R4-2 R4-7 ONE RO ROAD CLOSED WAY 10 MILES AHEAD =m* CLOS.- LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY R5-1 R5-2 R6-2 R11-2 R11-3a BRIDGE OUT ROAD CLOSED WEIGHT 10 FILES AHEAD TO LIMIT 10 LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY THRU TRAFFIC TONS R11-3b R11-4 R12-1 Sect.5B.01 to 58.03 December 2009 2009 Edition Page 383 Figure 313-17. Examples of Yield Lines at Unsignalized Midblock Crosswalks 20 to 50 ft--►I ' A-Two-way roadway =�° 20 t0 50 ft Note: If Stop Here for Pedestrians signs are used instead of Yield Here to B-One-way roadway Pedestrians signs, stop lines shall be used instead of yield lines. N� O S m m -► �_20 to 50 ft Legend Direction of travel Section 3B.18 Crosswaljk Markings Support: 01 Crosswalk markings provide guidance for pedestrians who are crossing roadways by defining and delineating paths on approaches to and within signalized intersections, and on approaches to other intersections where - traffic stops. 02 In conjunction with signs and other measures,crosswalk markings help to alert road users of a designated pedestrian crossing point across roadways at locations that are not controlled by traffic control signals or STOP or - YIELD signs. 03 At non-intersection locations, crosswalk markings legally establish the crosswalk. Standard: 04 When crosswalk lines are used,they shall consist of solid white lines that mark the crosswalk. They shall not be less than 6 inches or greater than 24 inches in width. Guidance: 05 If transverse lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the gap between the lines should not be less than 6 feet. If diagonal or longitudinal lines are used without transverse lines to mark a crosswalk, the crosswalk should be not less than 6 feet wide. 06 Crosswalk lines, if used on both sides of the crosswalk, should extend across the full width of pavement or to the edge of the intersecting crosswalk to discourage diagonal walking between crosswalks(see Figures 3B-17 and 3B-19). 07 At locations controlled by traffic control signals or on approaches controlled by STOP or YIELD signs, crosswalk lines should be installed where engineering judgment indicates they are needed to direct pedestrians to the proper crossing path(s). December 2009 Sect.3B.18 Page 384 2009 Edition Figure 38-18. Do Not Block Intersection Markings Note:Align the edges of the box to define the specific area that is not to be blocked. The box does not 0—)� I have to be rectangular in shape. Optional dotted extension Optional dotted extensions poor,A x my with - t� olid,white 1:o 5 = Direction of congested traffic Adjacent signalized intersection R10-7 (the R10-7 sign may also be O 7� Legend mounted over the roadway) - Direction of travel Option B: Option C: Option D: Box with"DO NOT BLOCK,""KEEP Box with 4 to 6-inch solid "DO NOT BLOCK,""KEEP CLEAR," CLEAR,"or similar text only message white crosshatch lines or similar text only message(no box) . JOR 08 Crosswalk lines should not be used indiscriminately. An engineering study should be performed before a marked crosswalk is installed at a location away from a traffic control signal or an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign. The engineering study should consider the number of lanes, the presence of a median, the distance from adjacent signalized intersections, the pedestrian volumes and delays, the average daily traffic (ADT), the posted or statutory speed limit or 85th-percentile speed, the geometry of the Figure 313-19. Examples of Crosswalk Markings location, the possible consolidation of multiple crossing points, the availability of street lighting, and other appropriate factors. 09 New marked crosswalks alone, without other measures designed to reduce traffic speeds, shorten crossing distances, enhance driver awareness of the crossing, and/or provide active warning of pedestrian presence, should not be installed across uncontrolled roadways where the speed limit exceeds 40 mph and either.— P P A. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel without a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an ADT of 12,000 vehicles per day or greater;or - B. The roadway has four or more lanes - of travel with a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an ADT of Spacing of lines 15,000 vehicles per day or greater. wheel path p ath avoid Sect.3B.18 December 2009 2009 Edition Page 385 Support: 10 Chapter 4F contains information on Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons. Section 4L.03 contains information regarding Warning Beacons to provide active warning of a pedestrian's presence. Section 4N.02 contains information regarding In-Roadway Warning Lights at crosswalks. Chapter 7D contains information regarding school crossing supervision. Guidance: 11 Because non-intersection pedestrian crossings are generally unexpected by the road user, warning signs (see Section 2C.50)should be installed for all marked crosswalks at non-intersection locations and adequate visibility should be provided by parking prohibitions. Support: 12 Section 3B.16 contains information regarding placement of stop line markings near crosswalk markings. Option: 13 For added visibility, the area of the crosswalk may be marked with white diagonal lines at a 45-degree angle to the line of the crosswalk or with white longitudinal lines parallel to traffic flow as shown in Figure 313-19. 14 When diagonal or longitudinal lines are used to mark a crosswalk,the transverse crosswalk lines may be omitted. This type of marking may be used at locations where substantial numbers of pedestrians cross without any other traffic control device,at locations where physical conditions are such that added visibility of the crosswalk is desired, or at places where a pedestrian crosswalk might not be expected. Guidance: 15 If used, the diagonal or longitudinal lines should be 12 to 24 inches wide and separated by gaps of 12 to 60 inches. The design of the lines and gaps should avoid the wheel paths if possible, and the gap between the lines should not exceed 2.5 times the width of the diagonal or longitudinal lines. Option: 16 When an exclusive pedestrian phase that permits diagonal crossing of an intersection is provided at a traffic control signal, a marking as shown in Figure 313-20 may be used for the crosswalk. Guidance: 17 Crosswalk markings should be located so that the curb ramps are within the extension of the crosswalk markings. Support: 18 Detectable warning surfaces mark boundaries between pedestrian and vehicular ways where there is no raised curb. Detectable warning surfaces are required by 49 CFR,Part 37 and by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) where curb ramps are constructed at the junction of sidewalks and the roadway,for marked and unmarked crosswalks. Detectable warning surfaces contrast visually with adjacent walking surfaces,either Figure 36-20. Example of Crosswalk Markings light-on-dark,or dark-on-light. The"Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for an Exclusive Pedestrian Phase for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG)" that Permits Diagonal Crossing (see Section 1A.11) contains specifications for design and placement of detectable warning surfaces. Section 3B.19 parking Space Markings Support: 01 Marking of parking space boundaries encourages more orderly and efficient use of parking spaces where parking turnover is substantial. Parking space markings tend to prevent encroachment into fire hydrant zones, bus stops,loading zones, approaches to intersections, curb ramps,and clearance spaces for islands =- and other zones where parking is restricted. t' Examples of parking space markings are shown in Figure 313-21. *Inside markings Standard: are optional 02 Parking space markings shall be white. December 2009 Sect.313.18 to 3B 19 - � � �" 4 � �' •�+'�.l is Ark 4bV , Sunnydell Ct,,`'Yorkvilie, IL 60560 , ji _"'r •a Hyde _ t w �, ti• - ?' -011 Gwgle r , 8 VvIele ,,t4 Eye alt Imageryy 0 e: 6,30010 41'3726 N �1938tH, c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ NB #2 II Finance ❑ EST. , � 1836 Engineer ■ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑ K a ty . PW 2011-54 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Country Hills Drive and Greenfield Yield Signs Meeting and Date: Public Works—August 16, 2011 Synopsis: A request was made to install yield signs at the County Hills Drive and Greenfield intersection. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Discussion Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff report. cip Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator EST. -� 1 836 From: Brad Sanderson, EEI o t�ilr� CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works � ® Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk <LE Date: August 11, 2011 Subject: Country Hill & Greenfield Yield Sign As requested,we investigated the possible installation of yield signs at the intersection of Country Hills and Greenfield. Our findings were as follows: • Currently there is no signage control at the crossing. • The intersection at Greenfield and Country Hill does not appear to have any sight distance constraints and appears to be"open". • There is a painted crosswalk across County Hills Drive. • The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to yield sign installation: Guidance: Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered: A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches; B. Number and angle of approaches; C.Approach speeds; D. Sight distance available on each approach; and E. Reported crash experience. YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of- way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and/or C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist. A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary;and/or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of-way at the intersection under the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3 year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 year period The section highlighted above would appear to apply to our case. Since there are no sight distance constraints and we are not aware of an accident history, this intersection does not appear to be a good candidate for yield signs. We have attached an exhibit, noting the location of the intersection and the appropriate sections from the MUTCD. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. 2009 Edition Page 49 Table 213-1. Regulatory Sign and Plaque Sizes (Sheet 4 of 4) Conventional Road Sign or Plaque Sign Designation 9 Section Single Multi- Expressway Freeway Minimum Oversized Lane Lane SUNDAY(and times) R10-20aP 28.53 24 x 18 24 x 18 — — — — (2 lines)(plaque) Crosswalk,Stop on Red R 10-23 26.53 24 x 30 24 x 30 — — — — Push Button To Turn On Warning Lights 810-25 26.52 9 x 12 9 x 12 Left Turn Yield on Flashing Red 810.27 2B.53 30 x 36 30 x 36 — — — — Arrow After Stop XX Vehicles Per Green R10-28 2B.56 24 x 30 24 x 30 — — — — XX Vehicles Per Green R10-29 28.56 36 x 24 36 x 24 -- — —Each Lane Right Turn on Red Must R10-30 28.54 30 x 36 30 x 36 — — — Yield to U-Turn At Signal(plaque) R10-31P 2B.53 24 x 9 24 x 9 — — — — Push Button for 2 Seconds for R10-32P 28.52 9 x 12 9 x 12 — — Extra Crossing Time Keep Off Median R11-1 2B.57 24 x 30 24 x 30 — — — — Road Closed R11-2 2B.58 48 x 30 48 x 30 — — Road Closed-Local Traffic Only RI 1-3a,3b,4 2B.58 60 x 30 60 x 30 — — Weight Limit R12-1,2 2B.59 24 x 30 24 x 30 36 x 48 — — 36 x 48 Weight Limit R12-3 2B.59 24 x 36 24 x 36 — — — — Weight Limit R12-4 2B.59 36 x 24 36 x 24 — — — Weight Limit R12-5 28.59 24 x 36 ;, 1`�' 36 x 48 48 x 60 — — Weigh Station R13-1 96 x 72 120 x 90 — — Truck Route i R14-1 26.61 'T , c#$ — — — — Hazardous Material 814-2,3 28 .-' 30 x 30 36 x 36 — 42 x 42 National Network R14-4,58: 30 x 30? x 30 36 x 36 36 x 36 — 42 x 42 Fender Bender Move Vehicles R16-4 2B.65 36 x 2= 48 x 36 60 x 48 — 48 x 36 Lights On When Using R16-5,6 26.64 24 x 30 24 x 30 36 x 48 48 x 60 — 36 x 48 Wipers or Raining Turn On Headlights Next XX Miles R16-7 2B.64 48 x 15 48 x 15 72 x 24 96 x 30 — 72 x 24 Turn On,Check Headlights R16-8,9 2B.64 30 x 15 30 x 15 48 x 24 60 x 30 — 48 x 24 Begin,End Daytime R16-10,11 2B.64 48 x 15 48 x 15 72 x 24 96 x 30 — 72 x 24 Headlight Section See Table 9B-1 for minimum size required for signs on bicycle facilities Notes: 1.Larger signs may be used when appropriate 2.Dimensions in inches are shown as width x height 07 Where side roads intersect a multi-lane street or highway that has a speed limit of 45 mph or higher, the minimum size of the STOP signs facing the side road approaches, even if the side road only has one approach lane,shall be 36 x 36 inches. 08 Where side roads intersect a multi-lane street or highway that has a speed limit of 40 MPH or lower,the minimum size of the STOP signs facing the side road approaches shall be as shown in the Single Lane or Multi-lane columns of Table 213-1 based on the number of approach lanes on the side street approach. Guidance: 09 The minimum sizes for regulatory signs facing traffic on exit and entrance ramps should be as shown in the column of Table 2B-I that corresponds to the mainline roadway classification (Expressway or Freeway). If a minimum size is not provided in the Freeway column, the minimum size ir- the Expressway column should be rased. If a minimum size is not provided in the Freeway or Expressway Column, the size in the Oversized column should be used. Section 2B.04 Right-off Way at Intersections Support: 01 State or local laws written in accordance with the"Uniform Vehicle Code" (see Section IA.11) establish the right-of-way rule at intersections having no regulatory traffic control signs such that the driver of a vehicle approaching an intersection must yield the right-of-way to any vehicle or pedestrian already in the intersection. December 2009 Sect.213.03 to 213,04 Page 50 2009 Edition When two vehicles approach an intersection from different streets or highways at approximately the same time, the right-of-way rule requires the driver of the vehicle on the left to yield the right-of-way to the vehicle on the right. The right-of-way can be modified at through streets or highways by placing YIELD (RI-2) signs (see Sections 213.08 and 213.09) or STOP(R1-1) signs (see Sections 213.05 through 213.07) on one or more approaches. Guidance: 02 Engineering judgment should be used to establish intersection control. The following factors should be considered: A. Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic volumes on all approaches; B. Number and angle of approaches; C. Approach speeds; D. Sight distance available on each approach;and E. Reported crash experience. 03 YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street;and/or C. An unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. 04 In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more than 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right-of-way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary;and/or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right-of--way at the intersection under the normal right-of-way rule have been reported within a 3-year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. 05 YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. Support: 05 Section 213.07 contains provisions regarding the application of multi-way STOP control at an intersection. Guidance: 07 Once the decision has been made to control an intersection, the decision regarding the appropriate roadway to control should be based onl engineering judgment. In most cases, the roadway carrying the lowest volume of traffic should be controlled. 08 A YIELD or STOP sign should not be installed on the higher volume roadway unless justified by an engineering study. Support: 09 The following are considerations that might influence the decision regarding the appropriate roadway upon which to install a YIELD or STOP sign where two roadways with relatively equal volumes and/or characteristics intersect: A. Controlling the direction that conflicts the most with established pedestrian crossing activity or school walking routes; B. Controlling the direction that has obscured vision, dips, or bumps that already require drivers to use lower operating speeds; and C. Controlling the direction that has the best sight distance from a controlled position to observe conflicting traffic. Standard: 10 Because the potential for conflicting commands could create driver confusion,YIELD or STOP signs shall not be used in conjunction with any traffic control signal operation, except in the following cases: A. If the signal indication-for an approach is a flashing red at all times; B. If a minor street or driveway is located within or adjacent to the area controlled by the traffic control signal, but does not require separate traffic signal control because an extremely low potential for conflict exists; or C. If a channelized turn lane is separated from the adjacent travel lanes by an island and the channelized turn lane is not controlled by a traffic control signal. Sect.2B.04 December 2009 2009 Edition Page 53 Section 2B.08 YIELD Sign (RI-2) Standard: 01 The YIELD (R1-2) sign (see Figure 213-1)shall be a downward-pointing equilateral triangle with a wide red border and the legend YIELD in red on a white background. Support: 02 The YIELD sign assigns right-of-way to traffic on certain approaches to an intersection. Vehicles controlled by a YIELD sign need to slow down to a speed that is reasonable for the existing conditions or stop when necessary to avoid interfering with conflicting traffic. Section 2B.09 YIELD Sign Applications Option: 01 YIELD signs may be installed: A. On the approaches to a through street or highway where conditions are such that a full stop is not always required. B. At the second crossroad of a divided highway, where the median width at the intersection is 30 feet or greater. In this case,a STOP or YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the first roadway of a divided highway,and a YIELD sign may be installed at the entrance to the second roadway. C. For a channelized turn lane that is separated from the adjacent travel lanes by an island, even if the adjacent lanes at the intersection are controlled by a highway traffic control signal or by a STOP sign. D. At an intersection where a special problem exists and where engineering judgment indicates the problem to be susceptible to correction by the use of the YIELD sign. E. Facing the entering roadway for a merge-type movement if engineering judgment indicates that control is needed because acceleration geometry and/or sight distance is not adequate for merging traffic operation. Standard: 02 A YIELD (R1-2)sign shall be used to assign right-of-way at the entrance to a roundabout. YIELD signs at roundabouts shall be used to control the approach roadways and shall not be used to control the circulatory roadway. 03 Other than for all of the approaches to a roundabout,YIELD signs shall not be placed on all of the approaches to an intersection. Section 2B.10 STOP Sign or YIFLI) Sign Placement Standard: 01 The STOP or YIELD sign shall be installed on the near side of the intersection on the right-hand side of the approach to which it applies. When the STOP or YIELD sign is installed at this required location and the sign visibility is restricted,a Stop Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36) shall be installed in advance of tl-e STOP sign or a Yield Ahead sign (see Section 2C.36) shall be installed in advance of the YIELD sign. 02 The STOP or YIELD sign shall be located as close as practical to the intersection it regulates, while optimizing its visibility to the road user it is intended to regulate. 03 STOP signs and YIELD signs shall not be mounted on the same post. 04 No items other than inventory stickers,sign installation dates, and bar codes shall be affixed to the fronts of STOP or YIELD signs,and the placement of these items shall be in the border of the sign. 05 No items other than official traffic control signs,inventory stickers,sign installation dates, anti-vandalism stickers,and bar codes shall be mounted on the backs of STOP or YIELD signs. 06 No items other than retroreflective strips(see Section 2A.21) or official traffic control signs shall be mounted on the fronts or backs of STOP or YIELD signs supports. Guidance: 07 STOP or YIELD signs should not be placed.farther than 50 feet from the edge of the pavement of the intersected roadway (see Drawing F in Figure 2A-3). 03 A sign that is mounted back-to-back with a STOP or YIELD sign should stay within the edges of the STOP or YIELD sign. If necessary, the size of the STOP or YIELD sign should be increased so that an_y other sign installed back-to-back with a STOP or YIELD sign remains within the edges of the STOP or YIELD sign. Option: 09 Where drivers proceeding straight ahead must yield to traffic approaching from the opposite direction, such as at a one-lane bridge, a TO ONCOMING TRAFFIC (R 1-2aP) plaque may be mounted l-elow the YIELD sign. December 2009 Sect.213,08 to 2B.10 Page 54 2009 Edition Support: 10 Figure 2A-3 shows examples of some typical placements of STOP signs and YIELD signs. 11 Section 2A.16 contains additional information about separate and combined mounting of other signs with STOP or YIELD signs. Guidance: 12 Stop lines that are used to supplement a STOP sign should be located as described in Section 3B.16. Yield lines that are used to supplement a YIELD sign should be located as described in Section 3B.16. 13 Where there is a marked crosswalk at the intersection, the STOP sign should be installed in advance of the crosswalk line nearest to the approaching traffic. 14 Except at roundabouts, where there is a marked crosswalk at the intersection, the YIELD sign should be installed in advance of the crosswalk line nearest to the approaching traffic. 15 Where two roads intersect at an acute angle, the STOP or YIELD sign should be positioned at an angle, or shielded, so that the legend is out of view of traffic to which it does not apply. 16 If a raised splitter island is available on the left-hand side of a multi-lane roundabout approach, an additional YIELD sign should be placed on the left-hand side of the approach. Option: 17 If a raised splitter island is available on the left-hand side of a single lane roundabout approach, an additional YIELD sign may be placed on the left-hand side of the approach. 18 At wide-throat intersections or where two or more approach lanes of traffic exist on the signed approach, observance of the right-of-way control may be improved by the installation of an additional STOP or YIELD sign on the left-hand side of the road and/or the use of a stop or yield line. At channelized intersections or at divided roadways separated by a median,the additional STOP or YIELD sign may be placed on a channelizing island or in the median. An additional STOP or YIELD sign may also be placed overhead facing the approach at the intersection to improve observance of the right-of-way control. Standard: 19 More than one STOP sign or more than one YIELD sign shall not be placed on the same support facing in the same direction. Option: 20 For a yield-controlled channelized right-turn movement onto a roadway without an acceleration lane and for an entrance ramp onto a freeway or expressway without an acceleration lane, a NO MERGE AREA (W4-5P) supplemental plaque(see Section 2C.40)may be mounted below a Yield Ahead (W3-2) sign and/or below a YIELD (RI-2) sign when engineering judgment indicates that road users would expect ar- acceleration lane to be present. Section 2B.11 Yield Here D Pedestrians Signs and Slop Here For PedestrianS Signs (R1-5 Scriesl Standard: 01 Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians (RI-5,RI-5a,111-5b, or R1-5c) signs (see Figure 2B-2) shall be used if yield (stop) lines are used in advance of a marked crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach. The Stop Here for Pedestrians signs shall only be used where the law specifically requires that a driver must stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk. The legend STATE LAW may be displayed at the top of the 111-5,R1-5a,R1-5b,and R1-5c signs,if applicable. Guidance: oz If yield(stop) lines and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs are used in advance of a crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach, they should be placed 20 to 50 feet in advance of the nearest crosswalk line (see Section.3B.16 and Figure 3B-17), and parking should be prohibited in the area between the yield(stop) line and the crosswalk. 03 Yield(stop) lines and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs should not be used in advance of crosswalks that cross an approach to or departure from a roundabout. Option: 04 Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs may be used in advance of a crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach to indicate to road users where to yield (stop) even if yield (stop) lines are not used. Sect 26.10 to 2B.11 December 2009 Page 534 2009 Edition CHAPTER 511. REGULATORY SIGNS Section 511.01 Introduction Support: 01 The purpose of a regulatory sign is to inform highway users of traffic laws or regulations, and to indicate the applicability of legal requirements that would not otherwise be apparent. 02 The provisions for regulatory signs are contained in Chapter 211 and in other Sections of this Manual. Provisions for regulatory signs that are specific to low-volume roads are contained in this Chapter. Section 511.02 STOP and YJELD Sig1s ((,RIA and R1-2) Guidance: 01 STOP(RI-1)and YIELD(RI-2)signs(see Figure SB-1)should be considered for use on low-volutne roads where engineering judgment or study, consistent with the provisions of Sections 2B.04 to 2B.10, indicates that either of the following conditions applies: A. An intersection of a less-important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule might not be readily apparent. B. An intersection that has restricted sight distance for the prevailing vehicle speeds. Section 511.03 Sneed Limit Suns (R2 Series Standard: 01 If used, Speed Limit(R2 series) signs (see k igure 511-1)shall display the speed limit established by law, ordinance,regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency following an engineering study. The displayed speed limits shall be in multiples of 5 mph. 02 Speed limits shall be established in accordance with Section 213.13. Option: 03 Speed limit signs may be used on low-volume roads that carry traffic from,onto,or adjacent to higher-volume roads that have posted speed limits. Figure 511-1. Regulatory Signs on Low-Volume Roads SPEED DO PASS AM STu YIELD LINT NOT WITH 5 PASS CARE R1-1 R1-2 R2-1 R4-1 R4-2 R4-7 # ONE ROAD ROAD CLOSED WA Y 10 MILES AHEAD CLOSED LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY R5-1 R5-2 R6-2 R11-2 R11-3a BRIDGE OUT ROAD CLOSED �EIGI-IT 10 MILES AHEAD TO LIMIT O LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY THRU TRAFFIC TONS R11-3b R11-4 R12-1 Sect.5B 01 to 5B.03 December 2009 Y . i s ✓ ,2� Caen ol a a 11 Goo Ie' t � r Imagery bate +6+3Qi201t ,.r 41"37'19T17 'J 88 25;5r 86"' a elev, 737 9t ' r r Yr'- Eye all 2 F32 it 14_t a r^� 21014 G_oogIe jmageiy Date: 6Q02010 " 41`3r'20 29"N b8"26 Co 04"W elev 4 (t Eye alt 1306!rTt c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ NB #3 II Finance ❑ EST. , � 1836 Engineer ■ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑ K a ry . PW 2011-55 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Windett Ridge Pedestrian Crossing Signs Meeting and Date: Public Works—August 16, 2011 Synopsis: A request was made to install pedestrian crossing signs on Windett Ridge Road approximately 265 feet west of Claremont Court. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Discussion Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff report. cip Memorandum EST. ! 1es6 To: Bart Olson, City Administrator 1 From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works � ® Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk <LE Date: August 11, 2011 Subject: Windett Ridge Road Pedestrian Crossing Signs/Crosswalk As requested,we investigated the possible installation of pedestrian crossing signs and crosswalk on Windett Ridge Road approximately 265 feet east of Claremont Court. Our findings were as follows: • Currently there is no signage control or pavement marking control at the crossing. • The governing entity on traffic control signage is the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The manual states as follows in regards to crosswalk designations: Section 2C.49 Vehicular Traffic Warning Sims (W11-15 and W11-15a) Option: Vehicular Traffic Warning(W8-6, W11-1, W11-5,W11-5a,W11-8, W11-10, W11-11, W11-12P, W11-14, W11-15,and W11-15a) signs (see Figure 2C-10)may be used to alert road users to locations where unexpected entries into the roadway by trucks,bicyclists, farm vehicles, emergency vehicles, golf carts,horse-drawn vehicles, or other vehicles might occur. Support: These locations might be relatively confined or might occur randomly over a segment of roadway. Guidance: Vehicular Traffic Warning signs should be used only at locations where the road user's sight distance is restricted, or the condition, activity, or entering traffic would be unexpected. If the condition or activity is seasonal or temporary, the Vehicular Traffic Warning sign should be removed or covered when the condition or activity does not exist. Option: The combined Bicycle/Pedestrian(W11-15) sign may be used where both bicyclists and pedestrians might be crossing the roadway, such as at an intersection with a shared-use path. A TRAIL X-ING(WI I-15P) supplemental plaque(see Figure 2C-10) may be mounted below the W11-15 sign. The TRAIL CROSSING(WI I-15a) sign may be used to warn of shared-use path crossings where pedestrians, bicyclists, and other user groups might be crossing the roadway. The WI I-1, W 11-15, and WI I-I 5 a signs and their related supplemental plaques may have a fluorescent yellow-green background with a black legend and border. Supplemental plaques (see Section 2C.53)with legends such as AHEAD, XX FEET,NEXT XX MILES, or SHARE THE ROAD may be mounted below Vehicular Traffic Warning signs to provide advance notice to road users of unexpected entries. Guidance: If used in advance of a pedestrian and bicycle crossing, a W11-I5 or W11-15a sign should be supplemented with an AHEAD or XX FEET plaque to inform road users that they are approaching a point where crossing activity might occur. Standard: If a post-mounted W11-1,W11-11,W11-15,or W11-15a sign is placed at the location of the crossing point where golf carts,pedestrians, bicyclists, or other shared-use path users might be crossing the roadway, a diagonal downward pointing arrow(W16-7P)plaque(see Figure 2C-12) shall be mounted below the sign. If the W11-1,W11-11,W11-15,or W11-15a sign is mounted overhead, the W16-7P supplemental plaque shall not be used. Option: The crossing location identified by a W11-1,W11-11,W11-15, or Wl 1-15a sign may be defined with crosswalk markings (see Section 3B.18). Section 2C.49 of the MUTCD would appear to apply to this case. Although there does not appear to be any sight distance restrictions,pedestrians or bicyclists could be unexpectedly entering the roadway. Therefore it would not be inappropriate for the City to install a W11-15, W11-15P, and W16-7P on both approaches to the crossing on Windett Ridge Road in accordance with the MUTCD. A painted crosswalk does not appear to be required unless the City would like to legally establish the crosswalk(see Section 3B.18 of the MUTCD). We have attached an exhibit, noting the location of the crossing and the complete section from the MUTCD on warning and pedestrian crossing installation. If you have any questions, please let me know. Page 128 2009 Edition 02 The Circular Intersection (W2-6) symbol sign (see Figure 2C-9) may be installed in advance of a circular intersection (see Figures 213-21 through 213-23). Guidance: os If an approach to a roundabout has a statutory or posted speed limit of 40 mph or higher, the Circular Intersection (W2-6)symbol sign should be installed in advance of the circular intersection. Option: 04 An educational plaque(see Figure 2C-9) with a legend such as ROUNDABOUT (W16-17P) or TRAFFIC CIRCLE (W16-12P) may be mounted below a Circular Intersection symbol sign. 05 The relative importance of the intersecting roadways may be shown by different widths of lines in the symbol. 06 An advance street name plaque (see Section 2C.58) may be installed above or below an Intersection Warning sign. Guidance: 07 The Intersection Warning sign should illustrate and depict the general configuration of the intersecting roadway, such as cross road, side road, T-intersection, or Kintersection. 08 Intersection Warning signs, other than the Circular Intersection(W2-6) symbol sign and the T-intersection (W2-4)symbol sign should not be used on approaches controlled by STOP signs, YIELD signs, or signals. 09 If an Intersection Warning sign is used where the side roads are not opposite of each other, the Offset Side Roads(W2-7)symbol sign(see Figure 2C-9)should be used instead of the Cross Road symbol sign. 10 If an Intersection Warning sign is used where two closely-spaced side roads are on the same side of the highway, the Double Side Roads(W2-8) symbol sign (see Figure 2C-9)should be used instead of the Side Road symbol sign. 11 No more than two side road symbols should be displayed on the same side of the highway on a W2-7 or W2-8 symbol sign, and no more than three side road symbols should be displayed on a W2-7 or W2-8 symbol sign. Support: 12 Figure 2A-4 shows the typical placement of an Intersection Warning sign. Section 2C.47 Two-Direction Large Arrow Sign (WI-7) Standard: 01 The Two-Direction Large Arrow (Wl-7)sign (see Figure 2C-9)shall be a horizontal rectangle. 02 If used, it shall be installed on the fai°side of a T-intersection in line with, and at approximately a right angle to,traffic approaching from the stem of the T-intersection. 03 The Two-Direction Large Arrow sign shall not be used where there is no change in the direction of travel such as at the beginnings and ends of medians or at center piers. 04 The Two-Direction Large Arrow sign directing traffic to the left and right shall not be used in the central island of a roundabout. Guidance: 05 The Two-Direction Large Arrow sign should be visible for a sufficient distance to provide the road user with adequate time to react to the intersection configuration. Section 2C.48 Traffic Signal Signs (W25-1,,_W25-2) Standard: 01 At locations where either a W25-1 or a W25-2 sign is required based on the provisions in Section 4D.05, the W25-1 or W25-2 sign (see Figure 2C-9) shall he installed near the left-most signal head. The W25-1 and W25-2 signs shall be vertical rectangles. Section 2C.49 Y-tWculax:Traffic Warning Signs (W8-6,W11-1,W11-5, W11-5a, W11-8, W11-1(1, W11-11, W11-12P. W11-14, W11-15 and W11-154) Option: 01 Vehicular Traffic Warning (W8-6,W1a-1,W11-5, W11-5a,Wl1-8, WI 1-10,WI 1-11,W11-12P,Wl1-14,W11-15, and WI 1-15a) signs (see Figure 2C-10) may be used to alert road users to locations where unexpected entries into the roadway by trucks,bicyclists, farm vehicles, emergency vehicles, golf carts, horse-drawn vehicles, or other vehicles might occur. The TRUCK CROSSING (W8-6) word message sign may be used as an alternate to the Truck Crossing (WI I-10) symbol sign. Sect_2046 to 2C.49 December 2009 2009 Edition Page 129 Figure 2C-10. Vehicular Traffic Warning Signs and Plaques ' TRUCK CROSSING . W8-6 W11-1* W11-5 W11-5a W11-8 W11-10 s %r. W11-15* TRAIL � -A EMERGENCY CROSSING SIGNAL AHEAD i .__TRAIL W11-15P* W11-11 W11-12P W11-14 X-ING (optional) W11-15a* A fluorescent yellow-green background color may be used for this sign or plaque. Support: 02 These locations might be relatively confined or might occur randomly over a segment of roadway. Guidance: 08 Vehicular Traffic Warning signs should be used only at locations where the road user's sight distance is restricted, or the condition, activity, or entering traffic would be unexpected. 04 If the condition or activity is seasonal or temporary, the Vehicular Traffic Warning sign should be removed or covered when the condition or activity does not exist. Option: 05 The combined Bicycle/Pedestrian (W11-15) sign may be used where both bicyclists and pedestrians might be crossing the roadway, such as at an intersection with a shared-use path. A TRAIL X-ING (WI 1-15P)supplemental plaque (see Figure 2C-10) maybe mounted below the W11-15 sign. The TRAIL CROSSING (W11-15a) sign may be used to warn of shared-use path crossings where pedestrians,bicyclists,and other user groups might be crossing the roadway. 06 The W11-1,W11-15, and W11-15a signs and their related supplemental plaques may have a fluorescent yellow-green background with a black legend and border. 07 Supplemental plaques (see Section 2C.53) with legends such as AHEAD,XX FEET, NEXT XX MILES,or SHARE THE ROAD may be mounted below Vehicular Traffic Warning signs to provide advance notice to road users of unexpected entries. Guidance: 08 If used in advance of a pedestrian and bicycle crossing, a W11-15 or W11-15a sign should be supplemented with an AHEAD or XX FEET plaque to inform road users that they are approaching a point where crossing activity might occur. Standard: 09 If a post-mounted W11-1, W11-11,W11-15,or W11-15a sign is placed at the location of the crossing point where golf carts,pedestrians, bicyclists, or other shared-use path users might be crossing the roadway, a diagonal downward pointing arrow (W16-7P) plaque (see Figure 2C-12) shall be mounted below the sign. If the W11-1,WI1-11, W11-15, or W11-15a sign is mounted overhead, the W16-71?supplemental plaque shall not be used. Option: 10 The crossing location identified by a W11-1,Wl 1-11, W11-15, or WI 1-15a sign may be defined with crosswalk markings (see Section 313.18). December 2009 Sect.2C 49 Page 130 2009 Edition Standard: 11 The Emergency Vehicle (W11-8) sign (see Figure 2C-10) with the EMERGENCY SIGNAL AHEAD (W11-12P)supplemental plaque (see Figure 2C-10) shall be placed in advance of all emergency-vehicle traffic control signals(see Chapter 4G). Option: 12 The Emergency Vehicle (Wll-8)sign, or a word message sign indicating the type of emergency vehicle (such as rescue squad), may be used in advance of the emergency-vehicle station when no emergency-vehicle traffic control signal is present. 13 A Warning Beacon (see Section 4L.03) may be used with any Vehicular Traffic Warning sign to indicate specific periods when the condition or activity is present or is likely to be present, or to provide enhanced sign conspicuity. 14 A supplemental WHEN FLASHING (W16-13P) plaque(see Figure 2C-12) may be used with any Vehicular Traffic Warning sign that is supplemented with a Warning Beacon to indicate specific periods when the condition or activity is present or is likely to be present. Section 2C.50 Non-Vehicular-Warning Signs (W11-2,W11-3. W11-4, W11-6, W11-7, W11-9, and W11-16-through'W11-22) Option: 01 Non Vehicular Warning (W11-2, W11-3,W11-4,W11-6,Wll 7, W11-9, and W11-16 through Wl 1-22) signs (see Figure 2C-11)may be used to alert road users in advance of locations where unexpected entries into the roadway might occur or where shared use of the roadway by pedestrians, animals,or equestrians might occur. Support: 02 These conflicts might be relatively confined, or might occur randomly over a segment of roadway. Guidance: 03 If used in advance of a pedestrian, snowmobile, or equestrian crossing, the WI1-2, W11-6, W11-7, and W11-9 signs should be supplemented with plaques (see Section 2C.55) with the legend AHEAD or XX FEET to inform road users that they are approaching a point where crossing activity might occur. Figure 2C-11. Non-Vehicular Warning Signs W11-2* W11-3 (Deer) W11-4(Cow) W11-6 W11-7 \ /y W11-9* W11-16(Bear) W11-17(Sheep) W11-18 (Bighorn Sheep) W11-19(Donkey) W11-20(Elk) W11-21 (Moose) W11-22 (Wild Horse) W15-1* *A fluorescent yellow-green background color may be used for this sign or plaque. Sect.2C.49 to 2C.50 December 2009 Page 132 2009 Edition Figure 2C-12. Supplemental Warning Plaques SHARE THE 500 ROAD FEET 500 FT MILES 2 MILES W16-1 P W16-2P W16-2aP W16-3P W16-3aP N EXT 500 FT First S W1 64P W 16-5 P W1 6-6P W 16-7 P W1 6-8P F Elm St __....._ PHOTO Lumsden Rd AHEAD ENFORCED W 16-8aP W1 6-91? W 16-10P W1 6-1 OaP WHEN FLASHING NEW] NOTICE W16-13P W16-15P W16-18P Note.The background color(yellow or fluorescent yellow-green)shall match the color of the warning sign that it supplements. Standard: 02 Supplemental warning plaques shall be used only in combination with warning or regulatory signs. They shall not be mounted alone or displayed alone. If used, a supplemental warning plaque shall be installed on the same post(s)as the warning or regulatory sign that it supplements. 03 Unless otherwise provided in this Manual for a particular plaque,supplemental warning plaques shall he mounted below the sign they supplement. Section 2C.54 Design of Supplemental Warning Plaques Standard: 01 A supplemental warning plaque used with a warning sign shall have the same legend,border, and background color as the warning sign with which it is displayed. A supplemental warning plaque used with a regulatory sign shall have a black legend and border on a yellow background. 02 Supplemental warning plaques shall be square or rectangular. Section 2C.55 Distance Plaques i W16-2 Series, W16-3 Series, W16-4Y,W7-30) Option: 01 The Distance Ahead (W16-2 series and W16-3 series) plaques (see Figure 2C-12) may be used to inform the road user of the distance to the condition indicated by the warning sign. 02 The Next Distance (W7-3aP and W164P) plaques (see Figures 2C-4 and 2C-12) may be used to inform road users of the length of roadway over which the condition indicated by the warning sign exists. Section 2C.56 Su 11emental Arrow Plaques (W16-5P,W16-6P) Guidance: 01 If the condition indicated by a warning sign is located on an intersecting road and the distance between the intersection and conditionn is not sufficient to provide adequate advance placement of the warning sign, a Supplemental Arrow(W16-5P or W16-6P)plaque (see Figure 2C-12)should be used below the warning sign. Sect.2C.53 to 2C56 December 2009 2009 Edition Page 383 Figure 313-17. Examples of Yield Lines at Unsignalized Midblock Crosswalks �—20 to 50 ft�I ' A-Two-way roadway =3to r— 1 m I�20 to 50 ft— Note: If Stop Here for Pedestrians signs are used instead of Yield Here to B-One-way roadway Pedestrians signs, stop lines shall be used instead of yield lines. m I--20 to 50 ft—► Legend --► Direction of travel Section 3B.18 Crosswalk Markings Support: 01 Crosswalk markings provide guidance for pedestrians who are crossing roadways by defining and delineating paths on approaches to and within signalized intersections, and on approaches to other intersections where traffic stops. 02 In conjunction with signs and other Treasures, crosswalk markings help to alert road users of a designated pedestrian crossing point across roadways at locations that are not controlled by traffic control signals or STOP or YIELD signs. 03 At non-intersection locations, crosswalk markings legally establish the crosswalk. Standard: 04 When crosswalk lines are used,they shall consist of solid white lines that mark the crosswalk. They shall not be less than 6 inches or greater than 24 inches in width. Guidance: 05 If transverse lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the gap between the lines should not be less than 6 feet. If diagonal or longitudinal lines are used without transverse lines to mark a crosswalk, the crosswalk should be not less than 6 feet wide. 06 Crosswalk lines, if used on both sides of the crosswalk, should extend across the full width of pavement or to the edge of the intersecting crosswalk to discourage diagonal walking between crosswalks(see Figures 3B-17 and 3B-I9). 07 At locations controlled by traffic control signals or on approaches controlled by STOP or YIELD signs, crosswalk lines should be installed where engineering judgment indicates they are needed to direct pedestrians to the proper crossing path(s). December 2009 Sect.313.18 Page 384 2009 Edition Figure 313-18. Do Not Block Intersection Markings Note:Align the edges of the box to i define the specific area that is not AAWL to be blocked. The box does not have to be rectangular in shape. Optional dotted extension Optional dotted extensions g _ Option A: �- Box only with �— 8-to 12-inch T solid white limes Direction of congested traffic /�h Adjacent signalized intersection R10-7 °r° °o _ AML (the R10-7 sign may also be 14° o mounted over the roadway) � 9 Legend —► Direction of travel Option B: Option C: Option D: Box with"DO NOT BLOCK,""KEEP Box with 4-to 6-inch solid "DO NOT BLOCK,""KEEP CLEAR," CLEAR,"or similar text only message white crosshatch lines or similar text only message(no box) 4�: OR 08 Crosswalk lines should not be used indiscriminately. An engineering study should be performed before a marked crosswalk is installed at a location away from a traffic control signal or an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign. The engineering study should consider the number of lanes, the presence of a median, the distance from adjacent signalizes!intersections, the pedestrian volumes and delays, the average daily traffic (ADT), the posted or statutory speed limit or 85,h_percentile speed, the geometry of the Figure 313-19. Examples of Crosswalk Markings location, the possible consolidation of multiple crossing points, the availability of street lighting, and other appropriate factors. 09 New marked crosswalks alone, without other measures designed to reduce traffic speeds, shorten crossing distances, enhance driver awareness of the crossing, andlor provide active warning of pedestrian presence, should not be installed across uncontrolled roadways where the speed limit exceeds 40 mph and either: A. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel without a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an ADT of 12,000 vehicles per day or greater; or B. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel with a raised median or i pedestrian refuge island and an ADT of Spacing of lines selected to 15,000 vehicles per day or greater. wheel path avoid Sect.3B.18 December 2009 2009 Edition Page 385 Support: 10 Chapter 4F contains information on Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons. Section 4L.03 contains information regarding Warning Beacons to provide active warning of a pedestrian's presence. Section 4N.02 contains information regarding In-Roadway Warning Lights at crosswalks. Chapter 7D contains information regarding school crossing supervision. Guidance: 11 Because non-intersection pedestrian crossings are generally unexpected by the road user, warning signs (see Section 2C.50)should be installed for all marked crosswalks at non-intersection locations and adequate visibility should be provided by parking prohibitions. Support: 12 Section 313.16 contains information regarding placement of stop line markings near crosswalk markings. Option: 13 For added visibility,the area of the crosswalk may be marked with white diagonal lines at a 45-degree angle to the line of the crosswalk or with white longitudinal lines parallel to traffic flow as shown in Figure 313-19. 14 When diagonal or longitudinal lines are used to mark a crosswalk,the transverse crosswalk lines may be omitted. This type of marking may be used at locations where substantial numbers of pedestrians cross without any other traffic control device, at locations where physical conditions are such that added visibility of the crosswalk is desired,or at places where a pedestrian crosswalk might not be expected. Guidance: 16 If used, the diagonal or longitudinal lines should be 12 to 24 inches wide and separated by gaps of 12 to 60 inches. The design of the lines and gaps should avoid the wheel paths if possible, and the gap between the lines should not exceed 2.5 times the width of the diagonal or longitudinal lines. Option: 16 When an exclusive pedestrian phase that permits diagonal crossing of an intersection is provided at a traffic control signal, a marking as shown in Figure 313-20 may be used for the crosswalk. Guidance: 17 Crosswalk markings should be located so that the curb ramps are within the extension of the crosswalk markings. Support: 18 Detectable warning surfaces mark boundaries between pedestrian and vehicular ways where there is no raised curb. Detectable warning surfaces are required by 49 CFR,Part 37 and by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) where curb ramps are constructed at the junction of sidewalks and the roadway, for marked and unmarked crosswalks. Detectable warning surfaces contrast visually with adjacent walking surfaces, either Figure 313-20. Example of Crosswalk Markings light-on-dark, or dark-on-ligl--t. The "Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for an Exclusive Pedestrian Phase for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG)" that Permits Diagonal Crossing (see Section IA.11) contains specifications for design and placement of detectable warning surfaces. Section 3B.19 Parking-Space Marking Support: 01 Marking of parking space boundaries encourages more orderly and efficient use of parking spaces where parking turnover is substantial. Parking space markings tend to prevent encroachment into fire hydrant zones, bus stops, loading zones, approaches to intersections, curb ramps,and clearance spaces for islands and other zones where parking is restricted. Examples of parking space markings are shown in Figure 3B-21. *Inside markings Standard: are optional 02 Parking space markings shall be white. December 2009 Sect.313.18 to 313.19 �'�► 0A. —' 'nett Ir +tD.t AdP' St 1rJ k linage U.S Geological 5ui;vey � ` • (D 2011 Google.; es Imagery Date 6130,2010 41°36'48 90"N 88°26'19 49"W elev 731 it E e°alt 2029 ft c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ NB #4 II Finance ❑ EST. , 1836 Engineer ■ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant El K a ry . PW 2011-56 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Pavement Management Study Presentation Meeting and Date: Public Works—August 16, 2011 Synopsis: EEI will make a presentation. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Discussion Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Presentation to be distributed at meeting. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J Q Legal ❑ OB #1 EsT, 1836 Finance El Engineer ■ Tracking Number City Administrator ❑ Consultant El KH+tl21I C-ty ` PW 2011-47 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Sunflower Estates Drainage Review Meeting and Date: Public Works—August 16, 2011 Synopsis: Discussion of findings. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Discussion Submitted by: Jeff Freeman Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff report. SUNFLOWER ESTATES DRAINAGE REVIEW United City of Yorkville, Kendall Co., IL Public Works Committee Meeting Discussion Outline August 16, 2011 1. Refresher From Last Meeting Issue 4 During Larger Storm Events There Is Street Flooding Along Walsh Drive and Walsh Circle ➢ Findings ✓ Significant Offsite Area Drains From South Through 4' X 7' Concrete Box Culvert Under Route 71 To 15" FES On East Side of Walsh Drive [Reference Exhibit A] ✓ Sunflower Estates Subdivision Storm Sewer Sized To Convey 10-Year Storm; Flows In Excess of the 10-Year Storm Flow Overland Down Walsh Drive and Through the Side Yard Drainage Easement Between Lots 49 & 50 [Reference Exhibit B] 2. Proposed Solution 4 Large Diameter Storm Sewer To Convey Flows From Point Of Existing15" FES To South Detention Pond [Reference Exhibit C] ➢ Offsite 100-Year Flow Rate To Convey To South Detention Pond: 46.9 cfs ➢ Proposed Storm Sewer Size: 30" RCP Engineer's Estimate of Probable Construction Cost: $107, 600 [Reference Table No. 1] Y Items To Work Out In Final Design ✓ Any Existing Utilities (i.e. Electric, Phone, Cable, etc.) Other Than Storm Sewer Within Public Utility & Drainage Easement? ✓ Temporary Construction Easements Along Route? ✓ Permanent Construction Easements Along Route? 3. Additional Discussion/Questions/Comments ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. G:\Public\Yorkville\2011\Y01106-C Walsh Drive Flooding\Doc\Outline-PW Comm Meeting 2011-8-16-City,EEI.docx CONSULTING ENGINEERS fi wl�g'f�E;,��L vvasnl a9 / 'df r sN r III 6�', - iF•f1 � ' ` =L"Y���`C Legend 50� 'i` Storm Sewer 650 0 4 4 <all other values> Olsen x n o' f° 6 'a• !!*'�° � � '�;� sss ® Manhole wafter Catchbasin Inlet 7 � V I 6A , Flared End Section Overland Flow Arrow Sub Watershed Contour �i' �r0 Colonial {„ III I i- rro ��t 15 675 "'sj° - ` ' - �._._y ,R ■ �� �Oa�o75 PGarden .^o _ 675 „1° �G�@rhlDrrri�rr o 6I5 ,,615 e o :66°650 fq` e o r � n e \ N 1h �r/1e ' � 6's570 673 675 q' ■ y0 Waslwlnd i' a i Green Briar + � � ���r•��Iir� Sunflower 0 1 I 695 • :� 700 j00 J.. ; L'7=y � 700 709 1R5 `. �Meado��se ,oa'" $Urrh�10W✓$,0"�$ft$tf @$ .°o' 1�0 1 1 10° "`+7� .:1. _ • � 7.2"RCP �l 695 f - r YA� 4'x7 CONC. BOX CULVERT ti° m 'z �,� .1omm1H9ihes .� s 4 v7�m �evr m °Yorkville Town Center - ti5 yq{� Bantusol MOP 115 'rs _ 7 ,� �- p ° �,� •' � V 15 7so V � � v 9 r N 4 � 1 �S )B 1°b R"III n C 11y �a\a�T1' i �.]I r 1t4i'�j 1y ,5p � 77p a 775 1 E 1 >Fef 1 Brandenburg 3 •^ \.�.. Ronhill 0 800 1,600 es Feet �y Engineering Enterprises Sunflower Estates ULY2011 EXHIBIT A N Drainage Review Y01106 52 Wheeler Road OFF-SITE DRAINAGE Sugar Grove,Illinois 60554 United City of Yorkville KKP OVERVIEW (630)466-6700 Kendall County,Illinois www.eelweb.com Legend f �'s:►+ t Storm Sewer tire !: •�rrliae �, ��.ri. 6.. oM t ® . „y Garden $.. � gGarden' V 12.. 4 � Greenr�br�hi$ar N �� J rHawtborne �'f'.. r .K' 21' 1 - c FA ® r.. 24" t + 27" ►`'G t ` ♦� Cornersfoq@ Yet *•� 42., A' i l 3r '�'F } `- I, �—� <all other values> 1111 nh I pp /. M I f [ a oe waisn ar• �s� Catchbasin � - Inlet Green Briar tf Flared End Section Green Briar.. Y _ v t ■ Green B �� riar - '1 Y' F • + '�s r r � Overland Flow Arrow Sub Watershed • r Walshw � - L C p SunUwEstates r C 12"RCP ��� � S • CULVERT .` 4-4, � 4'xT CONC. i 80X CULVERT _ i T :', y - _ _ � .Stagecoach � - mmY a I H�9h r A It �S♦A f0. wy. ♦t mq ' F 1 A t° Yorkville Town Center �' r + •�+ y �' 4 a� ell- f �y 70 . 14 Acre 0 400 800 Feet Engineering Enterprises Sunflower Estates JULY2011 EXHIBIT B N Drainage Review Y°"°a 52 Wheeler Road ON-SITE DRAINAGE Sugar Grove,Illinois 60554 United City of Yorkville KKP OVERVIEW (630)466-6700 Kendall County,Illinois www.eelweb.com Legend Existing Storm Sewer 411 ► p ^� Apt,- ❑ n 611 woo K t _;.' - 10 CONNECT TO 1211 REMOVE EXISTING 24"FLARED EXISTING STRUCTURE 1511 END SECTION AND PIPE, REPLACE WITH 36"RCP _ 1811 ' * 15'P.U.AND,DR NA E n', 2111 EASEMENT 2411 2711 REMOVE EXISTING 15" 3011 7ilp IN FLARED END SECTION AND PIPE ' 36" 4211 PROPOSED 30"FLARED END Major Culvert CONNECT SOUTH WALSH DRIVE SECTION AND REINFORCED Manhole STORM SEWER TO NEW STORM : CONCRETE PIPE Catchbasin SEWER AND DISCONNECT FROM "� ailg •t � '�� ADJACENT MANHOLE rn r Inlet f' Y Flared End Section ' Proposed Storm Sewer _ Proposed Manhole Proposed Flared End Section EXISTING 12" RCP CULVERT } 0517 -ter= �? Leo Stagecoach CD_ EXISTING A n -v 4'x7'CONC. N m BOX CULVERT TV CD 5 r f � 0 100 200 Feet a DATE: Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Sunflower Estates JULY 20111 N 9 9 P 1 PROJECT NO.: EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT C 52 Wheeler Road Drainage Review Y01106 PRELIMINARY STORM Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 United City of Yorkville BY. PR SEWER LAYOUT SEWER LAYOUT PATH: KKP (630) 466-6700 Kendall County,Illinois www.eeiweb.com H:\GISTUBLIMYORKVILLE,Y01106 NO. DATE REVISIONS FILE: Y01106-ExhB-11x17.mxd TABLE NO. 1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST PROPOSED STORM SEWER TO CONVEY 100-YEAR OFFSITE FLOWS TO SOUTH DETENTION BASIN SUNFLOWER ESTATES DRAINAGE REVIEW UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL CO.,IL August 10,2011 ITEM UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 TREE AND BRUSH REMOVAL LSUM 1.0 500.00 500.00 2 ISIDEWALK REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SQ.FT. 150.0 4.00 600.00 3 CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT LF 30.0 10.00 300.00 FENCE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT LF 300.0 30.00 9,000.00 4 PERIMETER EROSION BARRIER FOOT 600.0 2.50 1,500.00 5 INLET PROTECTION EACH 5.0 150.00 750.00 6 TREE PROTECTION EACH 10.0 55.00 550.00 7 EARTH EXCAVATION CU.YD. 100.0 12.00 1,200.00 8 TRENCH BACKFILL,CA-7 CU.YD. 15.0 40.00 600.00 9 12"RCP STORM SEWER FOOT 5.0 30.00 150.00 10 30"RCP STORM SEWER FOOT 578.0 75.00 43,350.00 11 36"RCP STORM SEWER FOOT 34.0 85.00 2,890.00 12 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE EACH 10 500.00 1,500.00 13 MANHOLE,TYPE A,5'DIA.,W/TYPE 1 FRAME AND OPEN LID EACH 4.0 2,500.00 10,000.00 14 MANHOLE,TYPE A,6'DIA.,W/TYPE 1 FRAME AND OPEN LID EACH 1.0 3,000.00 3,000.00 15 30"RCP FLARED END SECTION WITH GRATE EACH 1.0 1,750.00 1,750.00 16 36"RCP FLARED END SECTION WITH GRATE EACH 1.0 2,250.00 2,250.00 17 IRIP RAP,IDOT GRADATION RR-3 SQ.YD. 16.0 40.00 640.00 18 CLASS D PATCH,TYPE III,6 INCH SQ.YD. 25.0 75.00 1,875.00 19 SEEDING,MIX 1,LAWN MIXTURE ACRE 0.5 2,000.00 1,000.00 20 SHORT TERM EROSION CONTROL BLANKET,S150 N.A.GREEN SQ YD 1 1,100.0 1.50 1,650.00 SUBTOTAL $ 85,055.00 CONTINGENCY(10%) $ 8,505.50 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 93,560.50 ENGINEERING(15%) $ 14,034.08 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 107,594.58 G:\Public\Yorkville\2011\YO1106-C Walsh Drive Flooding\Eng\[Cost Est 8-10-11.x1s]ENG EST ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS SUGAR GROVE,ILLINOIS PAGE 1 OF 1 ♦,��0 C/T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� A 0 Legal ❑ OB #2 1 ,II 11 Finance ❑ EST. �Z 1836 Engineer El-�� Agenda Item Tracking Number City Administrator ■ °°°�^o O Consultant Cea, ❑ Ke da vs—ty PW 2011-48 <�E El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Road Maintenance on Tommy Hughes Way and Saravanos Dr. Update Meeting& Date: PW/August 16, 2011 Synopsis: Update of the road maintenance issues related to the pavement deterioration and potholes on observed on Tommy Hughes Way and Saravanos Drive. Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/A Action Requested: Informational Item Submitted by: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff memorandum. 0,1D C/r{- o Memorandum EST. 1836 To: Public Works Committee „0. -� From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director O O� CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Kendal C. '►�" Date: August 12, 2011 Subject: Road Maintenance on Tommy Hughes Way and Saravanos Dr. Update As an update to last month's meeting discussion, staff was contacted by the representative at Midwest Bank on July 16, 2011 to confirm that the pothole patching on Saravanos Drive and Tommy Hughes Way had been completed and they were in the process of reviewing bids for complete paving and finishing of the roadways. Since that time, Chicago Real Estate Resources Inc. has been awarded the contract to facilitate the paving and finishing work within the Stagecoach Crossing Development and should begin work within the next week or so. Attached is an aerial and plat map which illustrates the location where the work is to be completed. Should you have any questions, staff and EEI will be available at Tuesday's night meeting. 71 V . SN9etuacl•Fri - !� 1r � C M \t 1 • 4 • �rr t• iTO�Or1^Hughcs..fJa� O _ \ p 4 i •� 1 a 171 _ �1IL"a �. �+3L W. — 'Saravanos to 5 CM United C! of Yorkville GIS The Data is provided without warranty or any representation of ry City accuracy,timeliness,or completeness.It Is the responsibility of the Parcel Data and Aerial Photography "Requester-to determine accuracy,timeliness,completeness,and wt Provided By Kendall CountyGlS appropriateness of its use.The United City of Yorkville makes no �Y warranties,expressed or implied,to the use of the Data. s — - - ...,.........,a.,_. _ cxoue,u�c ..�....r. FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION �• ^�^M•�^^� N° STAGECOACH CROSSING AWWR \\ \ \ **� �• I'�\ � �� --—° AYw ra �.us p � '�°'rw r°s°®iaaax '1 I a[orwref+wr LSFS%!"s."Lr< \i\rivti \ '1 i WMI...=MIL[a= RL� aM1bfg4YYL4fY11. "•, tt � ►\ \ ii ^� \\ :101w'Di.iBQ�7i771€`,i4" i...f...W4..4rww+w aaW4 eor•.s � �pr� r ♦♦\ . \ -rrmr[I.www lr4arluwaL4wwl,arn+4masbrws4u \ 1\ '♦\ ��yyll � I � 41�/O4RllaWOw4Y M+4Y1bL.s YwM \ ♦ � wYIO.p4MAaw4M44.n L01Irl _ -� \\ `L \♦\ 1 \ N.�wbAVrinwwwr.w�w4wnw4rwRL w ♦ \ •� \ +y \ .ua1.......i.ew.r.,...Li...br......01.LrwL..4M.W i4..,..01i. \ LfR t ` W.KGI r• LMM�+115Ct�D_FA614t.NY_ GO.1{4•f \ \ q�y,�yy��{/���p�,{���pI�q�,r �p{�ryy�pr�q�R. I>SL�[ � \ ♦\ \ \ lilO��.�e1W�AA.�.vrii[�AYN[Y Lli�� L ' �a \ Y � � Yr I\ \\ P[GY�Iw4pC�A,�Rr[�4.�LyNY P1.4YI.IO4e � ..._ ._`_ - ! ,Lim._- y! \ ♦ \ k 1. a e 2 a a \ ♦ \ n L o / I / Q ' ,y \ lwwlmler eini r�� W IfYr:'bYi a -•• -. •n° -__-•`• _•-_--! _ ��� M � \af�� '\ \\ Derr r FINAL PLAT Of$UA0Ig810M STAO£COACH CROSSING �'+LBI1[IOLw P _�±\ 1 \ R� PAm w berrwws s a 4•]a9 =�J \ (NITRO GIM PL YoALVRLi. r—i�� \ \ NRMOµLf.M1NM.ILL I40q ,PI qL. r b x c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� a 0 Legal ❑ Finance El OB #3 EST. , � 1836 Engineer ❑ y City Administrator Tracking Number Police ❑ d111 111ty Human Resources El PW 2011-52 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Windett Ridge Mowing Update Meeting and Date: Public Works Committee— 8/16/11 Synopsis: Verbal update to be given at the meeting. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N / A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: N/ A Council Action Requested: Discussion Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ OB #4 II Finance ❑ EST. , � 1836 Engineer ■ Tracking Number y City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑ K a ty . PW 2011-31 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Kendall Marketplace Development / Proposed Improvements Meeting and Date: Public Works—August 16, 2011 Synopsis: Discussion of proposed work to stabilize site Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Discussion Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached staff report. cip Memorandum EST. ! 1es6 To: Bart Olson, City Administrator 1 From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works � ® Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk <LE Date: August 11, 2011 Subject: Kendall Marketplace Development /Proposed Improvements As requested,we have developed a preliminary plan for stabilizing the site and are seeking concurrence from the City prior to proceeding with completing the work. We have attached an exhibit that indicates the proposed scope of work. The proposed work generally consists of the following: • Curb and gutter installation • HMA removal • HMA installation at entrances • Aggregate placement • Minor grading and seeding-Park Currently,we are estimating that the cost of the proposed work to be between$115,000-125,000. It is our understanding that there is approximately$270,000 available for the City to perform this work. If an agreement on the work scope is reached, we are estimating that a contractor could be in place by mid to late September with the work being completed in October. If you have any questions or need additional information,please let me know. :� NK?„W a`yw•. nw-\Cw,.• K\\\�.a• ..V.\;•.Y •«W,., `K,^{N .. � ''K^' N•"+ti,n\, h""t.,\v. N`y\K\ �.\\w.-`• na\C�-hw •\hK aw`2� Kr�--..\,K ;~��`K4 ^��• \\K',V �, • 7r .W\\{•MV �••�, MwN+hw. }K,. 'a- ' S .K.,`•. �`•\S .hK�K• �'�^v,!`"`" N u;N., `+•`l',Ch\w nN V.h� -N+.wu• •..•.. : �t �t Z S K\, 2 MK } K, r ^"• ,K, M1• nww Kw K\:... nY SEE •.4. �u DP QETAIL 1W'y f2{ 2 • , lij} i 'y � N'A S l 2 Y�t S• K„ `�l�r trs- JCCs.'A:" Jl!•��( '+ t f,K1*'$ Now Ht f,� • ,K- • ..,N �1' J r ••j i ''1 ,M w Nw• 0.y � A\w � •" ���` �iN �; 'K 4 . , , 5 • l ,�"'w; \.M ... 1-n .�.,•.V N1.4,,hN ..K- ;�\�, �RMyNS•+ M, � :�.T .} } ,WKw V�J\w i• ilV•Y( N, �, K, aA,b N^^1^\lam A, nM. � �aq}�tir• 't\._ �v�• ^rr t i /C9/0339 ! i 9402,EGf+T-j - f �. . � � ■ . . 4 2/ Df f*a! 1«& wT0 A/ T 9 %¥ - z£k& 41,1r lR,TA w ,�f� ?t`, !& 5T9L6 ! ,z ~ /V a � x9z ± & \ . . 3 � > ,T 4�& Z vf9G3 e, 1,»: !»,29•• :vla a @,zrC / . Ap@.T,o,,,AL » IIIN£ r64R!&£ 0 TO/V §»KZ £ c/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ii J� a 0-0 Legal ❑ OB #5 II Finance ❑ EST. , � 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number y City Administrator ■ Consultant ❑ K a ry . PW 2011-43 El LE Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Emerald Ash Borer Update Meeting and Date: Public Works 7/19/11 Synopsis: See attached memo regarding treatment costs. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Discussion & direction Submitted by: Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Agenda Item Notes: o� Memorandum ESE 7836 To: Public Works Committee From: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works p Ll CC: ;A Date: August 2, 2011 .00 '� Subject: emerald ash borer treatment costs Committee members, Last month the committee asked me to obtain quotes for chemicals and injection kits to combat the emerald ash borer. I obtained one hard quote from the only vendor that is local, one from an online supplier and one directly from the company. The total costs are as follows: John Deere Landscaping $2439.36 Batavia, Illinois Tree care supplies.com $2826.29 Arbor Jet catalog $2672.00 Not only was John Deere Landscaping the least expensive, they will also come to Yorkville and teach us how to properly administer the treatments. For these reasons I would recommend that if we purchase this type of treatment, we purchase it from John Deere Landscaping of Batavia. I would ask that this be placed on the August 16, 2011 public works committee agenda for discussion. If you have any questions or need further information, please let me know. Working Order Sold To: J40HN DEERE ;City of Yorkville(#966886) 800 Farm J LANDSCAPES Yorkvilllle,IL 60560--1133 IW:(630)553-4370 BATAVIA IL#521 Ship To: 1330 Pierson Dr Batavia,IL 60510-1504 City ofYorkville(#966886) W:(630)406-0380 800 Game Farm Rd Yorkville,IL 60560-1133 W:(630)553-4370 Ordered Master Order# PO# 07/27/2011 143828884 leric Printed lCust omer Contact Sales Associate 07/27/2011 lEric Dhuse Mark Svatek Order#:61954251Ship Via:Customer Pick up LN Item# IDescription Qty Cancel Ship B/O Unit Price Ext.Price 2 070-0035 JARBORJET DELUXE TREE IV KIT 1 0 0 1 1 1169.100/EA 1169.100 3 040-4100N JARBORJET TREE-AGE RUP 1 LITER(NEW LABEL) E2 0 0 1 2 472.500/EA 945.000 4 030-2030 ARBORJET-CLEAN-JET 1 LITER 1 2 1 0 0 1 2 9.0401 EA 18.080 5 070-0155 ARBORJET-PLUGS#4 100/PK F2 0 0 2 54.090/EA 108.180 6 070-0020 ARBORJET-SINGLE TREE IV W/2PAC 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 199.000/ 1 199.000 Subtotal: $2439.36 Sales Tax: $i82.95 Freight: $0.00 Discount: $0.00 Estimated Total: For Chemical Emergency Spill,Leak,Fire,Exposure,or Accident Emergency Response Assistance,call: CHEMTREC Day or Night-1(800)424-9300 This working order is for reviewing purposes only.This is not a receipt. CUSTOMER SIGNATURE: John Deere Landscapes warrants that all products conform to the description on the label.Because conditions of use,which are of critical importance are beyond our control,seller makes no warranty,expressed or implied,concerning the use of these products.No employee of the corporation is authorized to make any warranty or representation,expressed or implied,concerning our products.Always follow directions and carefully observe all precautions on the label or manufacturer's instructions.Products used contrary to directions may cause serious plant or personal injury.Buyer assumes all risk of use of handling whether in accordance with direction or not and accepts the products sold to him by this corporation on these conditions. Tree Care Supplies - Equipment for professional arborists and landscapers Page 1 of 1 4� wR A CLOSEOW75 t SFA� CUSTOMER CS V U b Select a Category Search GCt These are the items currently in your shopping cart. Click the"submit your order now" button at the bottom of the page if you want to check out. To continue shopping, select a link from the navigation. Your current selections will remain in your cart. To check out now, press the"Submit Your Order" button. Delete Qty Name Price Total ❑ 2 Tree-Age ( 1-7 liters(priced per liter)) $559.00 USD $1,118.00 USD ❑ 1 Single Tree I.V. $275.00 USD $275.00 USD ❑ 2 Arbor Plugs-#3 Yellow $50.00 USD $100.00 USD ❑ 1 Deluxe Tree I.V. Quik-Jet Kit $1,299.00 USD $1,299.00 USD ❑ 1 CleanJet Liter( 1 - 11 Liters) $12.00 USD $12.00 USD UPS Ground $22.29 USD Grand Total $2,826.29 USD Continue Shopping Update Your Cart Submit Your Order To place a phone order please call 1-888-438-3117 ©All Rights Reserved I infoCc-treecaresupplies.com https://www.treecaresupplies.com/v4/go.gnf 8/1/2011 q� , r I w Revolutionary Plant Health Solutions ARBO- ■r�® r 2011 PRODUCT CATALOG Revolutionary Plant Health Solutionst ` 99 Blueberry Hill Road •Woburn,MA 01801 A To order products or to speak with a customer service representative,call (78 I) 935-9070 or visit us online at www.arborjet.com t Part No.020-2011 Rev.I/I I TABLE OF CONTENTS AboutArborJet........................................................................................................... Insecticides......................................................................................................................5 Equipment Cleaning& Priming Solution u Fungicides.........................................................................................................................9 ourmission 6mdevelop Nutrition__................___........... _.............. ____......... ...................... ___|0 the most e�x�o — Equipment-ArbnrjstTrce IN.Z,Puck.-----'--_--__...| | formulations and delivery systems possible 6/preserve Equipment Arboqot{l0K-j —'|2 The omwral and«rba"6rot Equipment'Arborjot Deluxe Kit._—_. inwn^n`in,nmentally mp:� Specialty Equipment- Palm Injector Kit.............................................|4 friendly way, tbmxbyfomve, c6awgioX6mstmx*age'pcnt ~- Specialty Equipment-VIPER Hydraulic Kit.............................. |5 — practices and transforming 4411 [h000inQAOaUvrrySystem------------------- |S .Arborjeth^to oyremiere m�bon��mv r�rb6��u The Arbo�etM�bodo|o�' -- ...................................16 care pm6aio*uL Ar6orp|uD Technology.........................................................................................|7 Replacement 18 Training& Marketing Materials....................................................................2u AdditionalAccessories......................................................................................... / Zo, Pest/PnoduccC)uick Reference Chart.............—............II Partners and Warranty Information........................................................24 ABOUT ARBORJET OUR HISTORY-Arborjet was developed by arborists for arborists in order to effectively manage and control the many exotic and native insect pests and diseases threatening our natural and urban forest today.Founded in 2000 by Peter M.Wild,owner of Boston + '' Tree Preservation in Woburn,MA,Peter was intent on finding a way to control the invasive Hemlock Woolly Adelgid for his customer base of 20,000.Arborjet's first prototype was a modification of the needleless medical injection device used post World War II for mass inoculation;Peter's concept was to minimize wounding to the tree, , a major problem in current injection techniques.With spraying and soil drenching becoming more and more controversial, Peter and his team were convinced that injection's time had come and set out to update and rewrite the standard for the future of all trunk `Ar6arjet has the best injection. OUR GOALS-Are to provide solutions for the arborist which will injection tools I've } make it possible to expand their ability to profitably and safely save �► -- urban and natural forests.Arborjet's products and methodology will �� � - �= used in thirt y y ears:' always be environmentally friendly and will allow for safe treatment - M �ils yµn.� w , � 1 near waterways and highly populated areas without contaminating ' N Paul Droz the air or the soil. They will be safe to use by the applicator and Trapper Tree Service our solutions will promote overall plant health care while providing Nantucket,MA remedies for the world's most invasive insect pests and diseases. y OUR RESEARCH-Our unique method of developing formulations :+ ' P ! +. includes a pairing process which matches the active ingredient with the physiology of the tree.This approach is why you will find significantly +,' higher residues,control and superior overall performance with our .+-w � -" , products. Our ability to achieve such high levels of performance " + �� � � "+► N r�„ Ib °;+ while maximizing uptake efficiency and protecting against - y . ' phytotoxicity and other harmful side effects sets Arborjet apart. OUR CUSTOMERS- Personal and customized attention is a large part ofwho we are.We are happyto answer your questions and help you decide which device and products are rightfor your arboricultural' needs.We care about trees and we care about you and your success. Your successful Plant Health Care Program helps us realize our mission - preserving and protecting the natural and urban forest. Ada` Training seminars are held throughout the year.Arborjet devices and ° 'V ti products are available through our office or distributors worldwide. !.'`- ;, r Y;k Call us at 781.935.9070 or visit our web page at www.arborjetcom. r�"" Most orders are shipped within 24 hours.Thank you for your interest. -- You'll be glad you became an Arborjet-setter! . r - � s _ _" 3 s, 0 'Wagem TREE-age® insecticide is Q � delivered into the tree's fD Beginning in 2003, vascular tissue to assure o rapid distribution and consistent results. It has been proven ° Arbadet labs were challenged in independent studies to be very effective against Emerald n Ash Borer. `= to re-engineer emamectin benzoate,a chemistry (040-4100)- I liter $525 X '� rD developed for large (040-4105)- I liter/Case of 8 $3906 — co co scale agriculture,into a *i liter treats 33 trees(10"DBH) micro-injectable product. o The result is TREE-iige Untreated Trees Tree Treated With TREE-age® 0 insecticide,a micro- encapsulated emulsion o which is highly effective y P R against the target pest, ir non-damaging to sensitive -- -- - " w tree tissue,and shows ' : s ■ r oh' r. extended residual activity to 4 o ' 0 100 3 minimize the frequency of a c J .90 " N a o J _ application. TREE-age" ... 0 80 r-'AUG.t _.- --- --- - a is a breakthrough product V a U _ in the tree care industry. r tT o U 30 r -- --- F ° "T 20 - o w 0 10 - a 0 F 0 - c � Imi+p I'mi Mauget Dino+P Dino -agg' "This is as dose to...a lmi+P:Imidacloprid+Pentra-Bark`s Dino+P:Dinotefuran(Safari ) silver bullet as possible." (sprayed on the bark) +Pentra-Bark° (sprayed on the bark) Imi:Imidacloprid(soil application) Dino:Dinotefuran(Safari°)(soil application) , Mauget:Mauget's Imicide°(injection caps) TREE-age:Arboget°Tree Injection Jim Bowesspokesman for Miehigatis Emerald Ash Published by McCullough,D.G.et al.(2007)in the USDA EAB Research&Development Review Meeting 2007 Borer programs TREE-age®was the ONLY product to achieve control without loss of efficacy overtime. Treat trees only 4 inches or larger.Results are best when trees are preventively treated prior to an infestation. 5 INSECTICIDES INSECTICIDES o i Bio-invecbcidc> � J AzaS01 ircin (040-2003) - I liter........................... $299* Water Soluble Bio-Insecticide from Neem °cn ........... -- 040-5001 -6 oz Container (040-2004) - I liter case of 8...................$2200 ( ) n 8 packets,0.75 oz each.. $250 Water _ (0•0-200%)- I Ider round case of S. Call far pricing o +. (5%Imidacloprid) (040-5002)- 18 oz Container Micro-injectable systemic insecticide for the management of 6 packets,3 oz each_,......._......_._..._.... $650 m rD specific insect pests of forests,trees,landscape ornamentals (040-5010)-Single Packet and interior plantscapes. OD f I packet,0.75 oz each....................... $34.99 , i Effective for:Adelgids (including Hemlock Woolly Adelgid), l vailttble;n IVE'•N A non-oil based water soluble powder bio-insecticide,from the Aphids,Leaf Beetles(including Elm and Willow Leaf Beetles), � ,-1 ° I Leer re;surrzable botanical plant Neem,for the management of a wide spectrum .S ` CD p Borers (including Emerald Ash Borer, Asian Longhorned =- .. round bottle far large of insect pests of trees,shrubs,turf,lawn,garden,vegetables, o Beetle and Bronze Birch Borer), Lacebugs, Leafhoppers, o fruit trees,and a variety of crops.Can be used as a spray,soil � projects with the Leafminers,Mealybugs,Psyllids,Scale Insects and Whiteflies. VIPER Hydra ibc I liter treats 25 trees(10"DBH) drench,tree injection or through chemigation. Effective for:Whiteflies, Leafminers,Scale, Mealybugs,Thrips, MICRO-'et Mixable Nutrition Aphids, Psyllids, Bugs, Flies, Sawflies, Caterpillars, Beetles, Weevils, Borers, Mole Crickets, Mushrooms Flies and Pests - 5 (030-4039)- I liter $75 ofTurf Grass. `�•'' (030-4046) - I liter case of 8 $558 PP *6 oz treats a rox, ! to 3 acres 43 trees (0.0%N-0.0%P-0.0%K+4.0%Ca) (10"DBH)(soil)drench and mixes with Add MICRO-jet mixable to IMA-jet to enhance tree health 50-150 gallons of water, w 0 response,eliminate mineral deficiencies and alleviate symptoms Annual Blue Grass Weevil To odd optional nutrition. of chlorosis while simultaneously treating for an insect infesta- tion.MICRO-jet Mixable is specifically formulated to be mixed —� 03 ONLY with IMA-jet i 3.0 - — a Emerald Ash Borer Control c�' 2.5 -- IMA-jet is highly effective against Emerald Ash w CL P"to- of EmwaMAsh mom Cow" Borer showing excellent results in the 2004 OU 2.0 0 iorr and 2005 studies conducted by Michigan State 00 wr University. a I5 6 — r+ o rti ' j 1.0 a w — O O.5 ! °c a. it )Et aroa+ti rwl4ta� caa.+ �yw Reference:www.emeraldashborecinfo Troy,Michigan, EAB Results,D.R.Smitley et.al.,Michigan State University 0.0 1 11 a Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Control a��a `eQ��c ��� ti ;. oc° ce Se PwwntalNomb*WOOrA*41dGenad IMA-jet is highly effective for multiple years J�� Pie a"°c s��, "r Q' against Hemlock Woolly Adelgid.Research shows Qto G°e over 90%control for up to 3 years with a single - ""' I IMA-jet treatment AzaSol is very effective against mid-to-late in-star Iarvae.The botanical characteristics along with multiple i modes of action make it an optimal choice to control Annual Bluegrass Weevil. >e� *'Aloft is NOT a botanical insecticide and it is a Restricted Use Pesticide for golf courses and sod(arms. ,•,� � �w��, , ,� �„ AzaSol insecticide is the only water soluble powder product with 6 m„ m„ Reference:Journal ofArboriculture,January 2002 azadirachtin extracted directly from seeds of the Neem tree in India. lice INSECTICIDES FUNGICIDES le PROSPH, 040-201 I -Box of 20/1 S ms...............$235* * „ .,,.,,.,.,.. ( ) S (040-30 I I)- I liter_ ..,....._.........................$I00 •�" —� ° "- 040-2013 -Single Packet/15 ms.........$15.99'`' - ----M--°°- ( ) g g (040-30 16)- I liter case of 8..................$744 I - (97%Acephate) (45.8%Phosphorous Acid) Micro-injectable broad spectrum systemic insecticide for the ���•,,,,,,,, Systemic fungicide and plant health response elicitor for - management of specific insect pests of forests,trees,landscape the suppression of various plant diseases-for use in spring "- ornamentals and interior plantscapes. or fall. Effective for: Leaf chewing insects including Caterpillars, Effective for:Sudden Oak Death,Anthracnose,Phytophthora, — Pine Tip Moth, Winter Moth, Gypsy Moth, Eastern Tent Caterpillars,Fall Cankerworm,Fall Webworm,piercing-sucking Black Spot,Scab,Fire Blight in Apple,Root Rot in Avocado and rJ w=. - insects such as Adelgids (including Hemlock Woolly Adelgid), Citrus,Canker Blight and many others. 511)A_Packet,! Aphids, Spider Mites,Scale, Boxelder Bugs and chewing and *I liter treats 50 trees(10"DBH) mining insects such as EAB, Leafminers, Sawflies, Birch Leafminers and many others. *I ISgram packet treats 1 tree(I0"DBH) Ale fu"941* Tree Defoliated by Caterpillars Tree Treated with ACE-'et (040-6000)-Case quart 4 warts $119 r -- ( ) 9 .. . $425 fay (14.3%Propiconazole) "y Preventative and therapeutic treatment of vascular fungal diseases in trees. Effective for: Oak Wilt, Leaf Diseases in Crabapples, Anthracnose in Sycamore and Dutch Elm Disease in Elm, t- *I qt treats 10 trees(10"DBH) Alamo@ is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company. CLEANING & PRIMING SOLUTION QUALITY CLEAN-jet "Thanks to PHOSPHO jet, ,,• ` (030-2030)- I liter (030-2034) - I liter case of 12 00 over 80 specimen trees were f` (0.5%Alkylary Polyalkoxylated Alcohols-Trace Fragrance) saved on this gv f course." d ` All purpose cleaner and lubricant for all Arborjet injection devices:extends the life of the internal device o-rings. Seth MacDonald Dr.Jay says, E.Tree Protect your investment,keep your equipment clean to plantation,FL + ' keep it in the best working condition:' ` 8 NUTRITION • MIN-jet Iron with Manganese ARBORJETTREE I.V. 2-Pack Kit (030-4010)- 1 gallon $150* (070-0010) $599 (0.75%Fe-0.38%Mn-0.2%Zn-0.10%Cu-0.10%B) Our most versatile injection system.For coniferous and hardwood trees.High volume, Works for iron chlorosis caused by iron deficiency. low pressure,can be used with mixable products. A perfect starter kit. A good choice as a general tree nutrition.Trunk injecting minerals makes them immediately available for use by the tree to enhance KIT INCLUDES health,growth,and development � I Bucket Recommended for: Oaks, Birch, Beech, Cherry, Elm, Horse 2 Tree I.V.bottles Chestnut,Linden,Poplar,Sycamore and others. 8 VIPER valve assemblies *11 gallon treats 37 trees(10'•DBH) I 2 Tree I.V.manifold 4-line • 4 Tree I.V,stands PALM-jet 2 VIPER needle clean-out tools (030-4030)- I gallon $199* ARH I Pressure pump (1,2%N-2.6%Potassium- 1.5%Sulfur-2.1%Fe I Tree I.V,tool kit 2.2%Mn-0.2%Zn-0.2%B) I Drill bit Specifically formulated for palm; for Manganese deficiency. I Arborplug setter WAR PALM-jet supplies balanced micro-elements, particularly I Graduated cylinder Manganese (5,000 ppm) for immediate use where Manganese � IA Liter of CLEAN-jet deficiency(Frizzle top)is predominant. ~w' r _ . I Funnel rvow uiCiudes Nitrogen Recommended for:Palms,other monocots,and hardwoods I Training manual ind Pntassiun, *1 gallon treats 75 trees(medium size palms)(10°DBH) Manganese Change in Palms(ppm) Arborjet's trunk injected UPGRADE OPTION 120 Manganese sulfate(MnSO4) � Untreated showed I.V.UNIT 100 showed the best results. New 80 j♦ SoilApplicaWn PALM jet formulation contains rt To improve treatment efficiency add additional Tree IN.unit(s). a this Manganese concentration ` (070-0020) $275 each d 60 Arborjet's Injected and other essential elements to 4o 1 m 'I MnSO, alleviate deficiencies in palms. (When purchased with 2-Pack kit $199.00) w m 20 0 Journal:ArboricuRure&Urban Forestry -20 AUF-10-0017.RI I • Article:"Effects of Soil•applied and Trunk -40 and Petiole-injected Manganese on J -60 __ Manganese Content of Cocontit Palm + Month I Month 3 Month 6 (Cocos nuafera)" I SATISFACTION 1 fe* SOILAPPLIED "It's been a great pleasure p. ROOT-jet Iron with Manganese wonting with Arborjet.They P (040-9000) -2.5 gallons............................$150" provided terrific assistance in (49/6 Phosphate-3%Potassium-2%Fe- I%Mn) helping as get started and were l� ROOT-jet Iron is formulated to supply Phosphorus, Iron always available .� and Manganese, essential minerals for root growth and leaf to answer our questions." ► . greening. ROOT-jet Iron helps to promote root growth and is recommended for trees in high pH soils that have chronic Guerin Wilkinson symptoms of Chlorosis(leaf yellowing), ROOT-jet Iron helps to Green Street 7 fec dar e acidify calcareous soils. t a+l Ann Arbor,W r Recommended for:All tree types. *2.5 gallons treats 62 trees(110"DBH) b e rrrYill EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT 0 0 QUIK-jet KIT ARBORJET Deluxe Kit (070-2250) $359 (070-0035) $1299 0 Cl- The QUIK-jet is a cost effective injection tool designed for lower dose applications. For high and low dosage applications in all tree sizes and all tree types. Everything you C It can also be used as a diagnostic tool to assess tree health and vascular activity.The need for high production use in one box! w QUIK-jet kit is a good starter kit for someone just getting into trunk injection and a great complementary tool to the Tree I.V. 0. rD KIT INCLUDES • I QUIK-jet device I Funnel E2 • I liter medicament supply bottle %z Liter of CLEAN-jet MM o • I Protective storage bag for I Training manual N QUIK-jet device o • I Belt hook 0 • I Belt clip • I Arborplug setter I" • 2 Drill bits • I Needle clean out tool _ -- • I Graduated cylinder +{ , ' "If r'o • I Pair of safety glasses °+ • I Graduated cylinder • I Storage bucket , IPA KIT INCLUDES 0• • I Deluxe carrying case I Tool kit QUIK-jet PRO KIT • 3Tree I.V.bottles I Drill bit 0 3 (070-2260) $459 I QUIK-jet injection device I Graduated cylinder • 1 QUIK-jet liter supply bottle&line • '/2 Liter of CLEAN-jet 7 The QUIK-jet Pro Kit was designed for the tree care professional. Using the same 12 Deluxe VIPER valves&needles I Funnel o. fast and effective QUIK-jet injector device, it also includes a utility belt for ready assemblies I Rechargeable hand held a access to tools,a professional"Doctor's"style carry bag,and all the ancillary tools and • 3 Tree IN 4-line manifolds compressor pump � accessories for production injection. • 6Tree I.V. stands I Tree I.V. expansion manifold • 2 Needle clean out tools I QUIK-jet training manual 0 • I Arborplug setter I Tree I.V.training manual v 0 C UPGRADE OPTION �■ ":;�; ADDITIONALTREE I.V.UNIT `. To improve treatment efficiency add additional Tree LV.unit(s). t 275 each (070-0020)....................................................... $ (When purchased with Deluxe Kit-$199.00) 13 [ti SPECIALTY Q Palm Injector Kit VIPER Hydraulic Kit -For palm trees.Only one injection site is needed to apply the formulations to each palm. For high production programs,government 7� 0 (070-0161) $175 contracts,and agriculture. ° IntroducingArborjet's Palm Injector Kit!Designed specifically for palms,this kit -For deciduous and ornamental trees. +• can be added to yourTREE I.V.or QUIK-jet device to give maximum flexibility when (010-1002)Without Dose Sizer $2700 d w treating palm trees.The Palm Injector Kit offers two needle choices and the ability 1 to inject directly or remotely with or without and Arborplug. ty (010-1001)With Dose Sizer $2900 KIT NOW INCLUDES • New Carry Bag dM J Use the Palm Injector Kit with either New Check Valves-Longer lasting,easy replacement w the QUIK jet or the TREE I.V.! New Industrial Regulator-For greater reliability&accuracy C) OPTIONS o DOSE For programs rams that require dose size validation(mounts directly) (951-11005) $399 each o 0 s CD DEVICE BELT W/STRAP (010-4010) $119 each ° KIT INCLUDES �* • Drill Bit 3/16 x 8"Palm Drill — o • PTC 1/4"to 5/32"Reducers • 5/32"Tubing WHICH SYSTEM IS RIGHT FOR YOU? n • STINGER-Palm Needle 8" Devices listed on chart in order of preference based on speed,ease of application and equipment cost a •VIPER Needle and line Device Abbreviations:VIPER Hydraulic=VH,TREE I.V.=IV, QUIK-jet=QJ a • Palm Injector bag ARBORJET EQUIPMENT • n. iT Tree Size Number of Trees Per Day o TreeType Application l t D8H(in.) <S 6-10 11-15 16-20 20-30 30+ •' < 14 QJ,IV,VH QJ,IV,VH QJ,IV,VH QJ,IV,VH VH,N,QJ VH,IV 0 EFFECTIVE Pesticide 15-18 QJ,I V,VH QJ,IV,VH IV,QJ,VH IV,VH,Qj VH,IV VH,IV t � Hardwood 19-22 IV QJ,VH IV,QJ,VH IV,QJ,VH IV,VH,QJ VH,IV VH,IV Trees >23 IV,QJ,VH IV,VH,Qj IV,VH IV,VH IV,VH IV,VH Arborjet makes caring Fungicide < 18 IV,VH IV VH IV,VH IV VH IV VH IV,VH for your palms quick Nutrition >18 IV IV IV IV IV IV and effective with,the < 14 QJ,IV,VH QJ',IV,VH IV,QJ,VH IV,VH,QJ VH,IV VH,IV Palm Injector Kit! Pesticide 15-18 QJ,IV,VH IV,QJ,VH IV,VH IV,VH VH,IV VH,IV Conifer i 19-22 IV,QJ,VH IV,QJ,VH IV,VH IV,VH IV,VH IV,VH For use with Arborjets Trees >23 IV IV IV IV IV IV UIK-'et or TREE I.V. Fungicide <I8 IV,VH IV 1V IV IV IV Q Nutrition ' >IB IV lV IV IV IV IV I; ARBORJET METHODOLOGY ARBORPLUG TECHNOLOGY 0 The Arborjet Methodology represents the cutting edge in trunk injection The patent pending Arborplug is a technological advancement in trunk injection and technology. It is precise,efficient,highly effective and easy to do. a key component of the Arborjet injection methodology. o 0 CL c n Arborjet has ranked #1 in every head to head university study. ADVANTAGES OF THE ARBORPLUG o d • Facilitates high volumes of medicament Protects the surrounding environment m No other system compares to Arborjet.The method delivery directly to the xylem tissue of and the applicator from unintended `D is so safe and simple to use,you can start treating any tree type. product contact. m trees immediately! •Arborplug's tight seal in the tree enables • Prevents lost or wasted product. ,°, v� pressure to be sustained throughout :a • 1 . DRILL injection process, making delivery fast • Minimizes the number of injection sites. o and consistent. • "Closed"injection site limits wounding, speeds healing,inhibits decay or infection 2. PLUG •The self sealing surgical septum prevents from entering site and prevents site from product leakage and product"blow back." N becoming vector for insects. 0 3. 1 NJ ECT • Fastest product delivery times • No risk of cambial injection o • Closed injection site - o • Lowest wound profile Y +; Y'P'+il'.�" a • Fastest wound closure • No risk of bark separation w • No product"Blow-Back" '"� • No bark cracking 0 #4 Arborplug 3/8" PROPER ARBORPLUG PLACEMENT For conifer and medium to large trees. (070-0155)-Pack of 100 (010-6004)-Pack of 25 $20 Sir c GUARANTEED """&" � #3 Arborplug 9/32" WOM) For small to medium deciduous trees. "I love my Arborjet system and (070-0150)-Pack of 100 $50 1 am especially amazed by the Tree I.V." #4 #3 + Matthew Perkins .J. Done Rite Tree&Plant Health Care "•• `� Boise,Ohio _-�,_� 17 16 REPLACEMENT PARTS REPLACEMENT PARTS 0 0 VIPERValve Assembly Tree I.V.O-Ring Rebuild Kit 2-Pack (010-3055) g000060 0 (070 0500) $70 0a CL a Components:2Valves&Needles w 0 M M rn QUIK-jet Rebuild Kit — — DeluxeVIPER Needle (070-2281) $20 Z7 r - :__ 2-Pack :.. ... �LJ (070-0515) $29.95 0 Components:2 Needles 0 Tree I.V.Expansion Kit N (010-7016).... $150 0 Expand the number of injectors w VIPER Needle perTree I.V.unit from 4 to 8 4-Pack a (070-0501) $32 0 Components:4 Needles Tubing 1/4" EVA 5' 0 (070-0102)_........._.........................____ $12 a Components:5 feet of 1/4" a PTC 10/32" to 1/4" Push Tubing 5/32" Poly 10' 4-Pack (070-0103)..........................._..............,....:... 10 IT (070-0100) $15 Components: 10 feet of 5/32" D rn PTC 10/32"to 5/32" Push o 4-Pack (070-0101) $15 1 Liter Supply Bottle (010-9022) .$12 �. I Liter Tree I.V.Supply Bottle (010-9023) $12 1 Deluxe Valve Cartridge 2-Pack QUIK-jet Glass Barrel (070-0110) $48 (975-9446) $20 18 19 TRAINING & MARKETING MATERIALS TRAINING & MARKETING MATERIALS Arborjet has a variety of high quality training and marketing resources available to w train personnel and grow your Arborjet Plant Health Care business.Materials are Tree Pest Program Planner $9 available for purchase through Arborjet or as a free download from our website. South-Eastern (020-4004) Western(020-4006) Mid-Western (020-4005) North-Eastern(020-4007) Go to"Marketing Material"at shop.arborjet.com An 8 1/2 X I I pad of 50 tear off sheets designed to assist = applicators applying Arborjet's wide range of products to a specific region's most common pests. +� Training DVD QUIK-et&Tree I.V. Free download on website. 4`M� (020-1001) $6 Pocket Field Guide Say Goodbye to EAB Doorhanger (020-4002) .$10/50pc i r (020-1051) $9 4.25"x I I" Full color,double sided doorhanger for promotion - A 36 page pocket sized,illustrated guide to the most common of EAB treatment with space for attaching your logo or trees&pests,and how to treat with Arborjet products.It's an business card. h extremely useful tool when out in the field. - — For a complete viewing of available marketing materials, -� M go to"Marketing Material"at shop.arborjet.com FROM, encti Arborjet Advantage-For Homeowner (020-2055) $85/100pc A 2 sided 8%"x I I"color sales sheet outlining the advantages of injecting using the Arborjet method to homeowners. ADDITIONAL ACCESSORIES +... �.. It explains how it works and what it does. Space on back for attaching your business card or adding text. Free download on website. Diameter Tape Measures tree size.3/8"x 12'compact measuring tape instantly ,r converts tree circumference to diameter inches(DBH). 6 Arbo rjet Advantage-For Professional (975-00165) _ _ .$26 tp y �kkY# (020-2054) $100/50pc A 4 page, 8%" x 11" color brochure outlining the Arborjet methodology, products, competitive advantages, Stinger and Needle Assembly and detailed examples of how you can make money using the Arborjet system. No Arborplug required Free download on website. -Specialized applications please inquire. (010-5005) . _ _ $175 Treatment Facts for EAB (020-4000)._ _ _ $100/50pc A 4 page,8 A"x I I"color brochure outlining current Emerald QUIK-jet Injection Device Ash Borer facts,Arborjet treatments and university study No accessories included. data supporting effectiveness of Arborjet products. Free download on website. (070-2235) $299 - �r (Purchased with 2-Pack Kit-$219.00) 21 20 INFORMATION PEST INFORMATION PEST O Insecticide Fungicide Nutrition Inseakide Fungicide Nutrition o n ro ■ ■ 0 ■ ■ c ■ CL n w Adelgid X Mealy Bugs X X X Aphids X _ X X Mites X m Anthracnose X X Oak Wilt X co Apple Scab X Palm Mites X 7 Bagworm X X Palmetto Weevil X X t Birch Borer X X X Pine Cone Worm X J Birch Leaf Miner X X X Pine Tip Moth X X X o Bronze Birch Borer X X X Psyllids X X X _ < Bud Worm X X Red Palm Weevils X X w Cankerworm X X Root Rod X o Caterpillars X X M"Ophthora w Chlorosis X X Sawfly Larvae X X X Citrus Longhorned Beetle X X scale-soft X X Clearwing Borer X X Scale-Hard X X o Dutch Elm disease X Stem Cankers X h Eastern Tern Caterpillar X X Spider Mites X Emerald Ash Borer X X X Sudden Oak Beath - X Elm Leaf Beetle X X X Tent Caterpillar X X a Eucalyptus Borer X X X TI+ Ps X X X w Erythrina GAI Wasp X X X Whiteflies X X Fall Webworm X X White Pine Weevil X X C Whiteflies X X o Flathead Borers X X X Winter Moth X X Fireblight X Zimmerman Pine Moths X X Forest Tent Caterpillar X X X c Gypsy Moth X Japanese Beetle X X X X General Nutrition HemlockWoolVAdelgid X X Partial listing of treatable pests.For full listing of all pests visit www.arbodet.com. Check the website for product availability in your state. Lacebugs - X X Leaf Diseases X L.eafminer X X X _ ©2011 Arborjet,Inc,99 Blueberry Hill Rd.Woburn MA 01801.Important:Always read and follow label instructions Leafhoppers X X before buying or using these products. The instructions contain important conditions of sale,including limitations of warranty and remedy.TREE-Sge®insecticide is a Restricted Use Pesticide and must only be sold to and used by a state Longhorned Borers X X X certified applicator or by persons under their direct supervision. TREE-age° Is not registered for use in all states. Please check with your state or local extension service prior to buying or using this product.TREE-9ger'is a registered trademark of Arborjet.Inc,Alamo"is a registered trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.Imicide14 is a registered trademark of Mauget Inc.Safaria is a registered trademark of Valent U.S.A.Corporation.Pentra•BarO is a registered trademark used by Quest Products Corporation. Z-4 RETAIL PARTNERS WARRANTY/RETURN What do I need? JOHN DEERE \® MIDWE5T i Arborjet's complete tree care system has been designed to meet your most challenging LANDSCAPES ARBORIST SUPPLIES i tree care needs. Whether you're a professional arborist, resort superintendent, municipality or an advanced Do-It-Yourselfer,Arborjet has the right solution for you. d K "SEED �I� .r - _ _ I< Ra nlyawT> earre H A 1 A SchwA c Advancements �S 7 , t e 8 s ti+w,a LJ'P'1 iz►4YIOr a<ltliGN HORTICULTURAL TOOL.4 SUPPLY COMPANY '�► : , HELENA -... ARTHUR 'CLESEN INC. TARGET. SPECWLTY PRODUCTS Delivering Value X06%buy 06% 0 A I { Denver location only — _ . To locate a distributor or service provider near you,go to the"Contact Us"tab on our website:www.Arborjet.com. Arborist and Landscape Professionals -Arborjet provides a variety of tools and formulations which give the arborist complete control for a broad range of insect Arborjet is committed to providing the personal service you deserve.We stand pests and disease and allow you to tailor your treatment to each client's property. behind all of our products and want to make sure you are completely satisfied. With Arborjet,you can combine pesticides and nutrition in one treatment. WARRANTY: Arborjet Equipment is Warranted for 30 days against defects in workmanship Resort Care-Trees that define your golf course,ski slopes or entrance ways are far and 90 days against defects in parts only. RETURNS: I.Locate original invoice and contact too valuable to put at risk.Arborjet provides a variety of tools and formulations to Arborjet.2.Upon authorization,package item appropriately,including a copy of the original control a broad range of insect pests and disease.Arborjet's unique systems allow you invoice, and ship prepaid to: Arborjet Inc, Merchandise Return, 99 Blueberry Hill Rd, to combine pesticides and nutrition in one treatment. Woburn, MA 01801 (Conditions: all returns must be authorized by Arborjet and must Municipality-For those prominent trees along your roadways and in parks,Arborjet be accompanied by original invoice.Unless otherwise warranted,all returns must be made provides a variety of tools and formulations to control a broad range of insect pests within 30 days of purchase. A 20%restocking fee will be applied to returns of non-defective and disease.Specially designed programs can be offered allowing you to quickly and goods. All sales of liquid products are final. Credit or refund will be applied when returned inexpensively save your most valuable trees. merchandise is received by Arborjet.Returns which are deemed to be in good working order Homeowner Care-For the Do-It-Yourselfer,Arborjet offers professional technology or returns for goods damaged and not defective shall be returned to customer if customer in an affordable homeowner sized kit,which allows you to save your most valuable prepays the freight.These goods will be held for 30 days after notification and then destroyed trees from a broad range of insect pests and disease.Please consult a certified arborist without liability of replacement or refund by Arborjet), for additional advice. y 24