The URL can be used to link to this page

Plan Commission Packet 2012 10-17-12 Clio United City of Yorkville "% 800 Game Farm Road EST. '� _y 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 -4 Telephone: 630-553-4350 O,t� ew3 saa� `�I Fax: 630-553-7575 J� KenWCgwy <LE ��' RESCHEDULED PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA Wednesday, October 17, 2012 Yorkville City Hall Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Meeting Called to Order: 7:00 p.m. Roll Call: Previous meeting minutes: September 12,2012 Citizen's Comments -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Hearings 1. PC 2012-09 James G. Ratos, Petitioner, has filed an application with Kendall County, Illinois, requesting Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval for the Countryside Center property for the purpose of constructing a new 38,500 square foot cinema complex. The property, to be known as Kendall Crossing, consists of approximately 18.5 acres and is located immediately north of US Route 34,west of Illinois Route 47,generally south of Countryside Parkway and east of Center parkway, in Yorkville,Illinois. Old Business 1. City Council Action Updates a. PC 2012-06 Success in the Suburbs,Inc.—Special Use(Mile and 11/2 Review) b. PC 2012-07 Souk Hemintharong—Rezoning(Mile and'/2 Review) 2. Illinois Rte. 47 Roadway Project Update New Business 1. PC 2012-09 James G. Ratos, Petitioner, has filed an application with Kendall County, Illinois, requesting Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval for the Countryside Center property for the purpose of constructing a new 38,500 square foot cinema complex. The property, to be known as Kendall Crossing, consists of approximately 18.5 acres and is located immediately north of US Route 34,west of Illinois Route 47, generally south of Countryside Parkway and east of Center parkway, in Yorkville, Illinois. -Action Items Special Use/PUD Adjournment DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION City Council Chambers Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:00pm Commission Members in Attendance: Chairman Tom Lindblom Michael Crouch Sandra Adams Jeff Baker Art Prochaska Jack Jones Charles Kraupner Absent: James Weaver, Jane Winninger Other City Staff Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Other Guests— none Meeting Called to Order Chairman Tom Lindblom called the meeting to order at 7:00pm. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Previous Meeting Minutes August 8, 2012 The minutes were approved as read on a motion by Crouch and Prochaska. Unanimous voice vote approval. Citizen's Comments None Public Hearings None Old Business—None New Business 1. PC 2012-06 Success in the Suburbs Ms. Barksdale-Noble said this case is a 1.5 Mile Review. It is a request for a major amendment for a Special Use Permit to allow a private equestrian facility to become a public facility. It is located on Ashe Road/Eldamain Road and has already received County approval. Mr. Crouch moved to approve PC 2012-06 and the motion was seconded by Mr. Baker. Roll call: Prochaska-yes, Crouch-yes, Kraupner-yes, Adams-yes, Jones-yes, Baker-yes, Lindblom-yes. Passed 7-0. 1 2. PC 2012-07 Souk Hem ingtharong Request for Rezoning This is also a 1.5 Mile Review for the petitioner who wishes to build a guesthouse on his property and is asking to rezone from R-1 to agriculture to allow a home for his parents. Ms. Barksdale-Noble said the property has 2 zonings—the house is zoned R-1 and the remainder of the property is agriculture. A motion was made by Commissioner Crouch and seconded by Commissioner Jones to approve this 1.5 Mile Review. Roll call: Crouch-yes, Kraupner-yes, Adams-yes, Jones-yes, Baker-yes, Prochaska-yes, Lindblom-yes. Passed 7-0. Additional Business Ms. Barksdale-Noble said she now has a planning intern who will work 3 days per week and will assist with research. Inquiries were made about updates for the River Road bridge and the Rt. 47 project, however, no further progress has been made since the last meeting. A timeline for the south side of town is expected soon and it will be posted on the website. The contractor has a certain amount of time once the project begins. Adiournment Mr. Crouch moved to adjourn the meeting and Mr. Prochaska seconded the motion. Meeting adjourned at 7:07pm. Respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker 2 Memorandum J= T To: Plan Commission Esr. —� less From: Krysti J. Barksdale- Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: October 10,2012 Subject: PC 2012-09—Countryside Center (Kendall Crossing)—Special Use <LE w Proposed Planned Unit Development(PUD) for New Cinema Complex Petitioner's Request: The Petitioner, James G. Ratos, is seeking Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval of a proposed new cinema complex to be located on the property formerly known as the Countryside Center development at the northwest quadrant of US 34 (Veterans Parkway) and Il Route 47 (Bridge Street). The proposed PUD will consist of an approximately 3 8,5 00 square foot movie theater owned and operated by Neighborhood Cinema Group (NCG) as well as other retail outlots on the roughly vacant 18.5-acre site. The property is currently zoned B-2 General Commercial. At this time the Petitioner is seeking Special Use permit for PUD approval only and will return before the Plan Commission at a later date with engineering plans for Preliminary Plan/Final Plat approval. Property Background: The former Countryside Center shopping mall was constructed in the early 1970's and consisted of three (3) multi-tenant commercial/retail buildings in a total of approximately 160,000 square feet. The shopping mall also had several outlots, in addition to a movie theater. Over the decades the open-air design concept of the pedestrian style mall experience became "out-dated" and gave way to the convenience of big- box retailers and lifestyle center developments. As the amount of vacancies increased and site improvements decreased,the Countryside Center shopping mall fell into disrepair. Vol °mod VI Ira Former Countryside Center Shopping Mall Source:AirPhoto USA circa 1997-2004 In 2004,the City of Yorkville conducted a feasibility study in order to determine the eligibility of the Countryside Center shopping mall as a redevelopment project area to establish a Tax Increment Finance (TIF) District. Upon completion of the study by URS/TPAP of Chicago, the City adopted ordinances designating the Countryside Center as a TIF district in March 2005.1 The City also entered into a redevelopment agreement with the former owner/developer of the shopping center, Tri-Land Properties, requiring them to demolish the deteriorating retail structures, reconfigure adjoining roadways/means of access, and redevelop the property for future retail. In August 2008, only the demolition of the former shopping mall structure had been completed and the property remained vacant. Therefore, the City approved a subsequent redevelopment agreement in hopes of stimulating activity on the property and further committing the developer to submitting an application for Planned Unit Development by June 2009 and a redevelopment plan by March of 2010. Since that time, no additional action has occurred on the property. Additionally, a permit with the Illinois Department of Transportation(IDOT) for much-needed full, signalized access off of Rte. 47 into the subject property has since expired and the former developer/owner, Tri-Land Properties, lost the property in foreclosure. Bank of America is now the title holder of the property and is actively marketing the site for sale. I k F 6 Y AR` Current Day Countryside Center Property Source:United City of Yorkville GIS circa 2009 Proposal Summary: Overall Site Plan&Access: The overall site plan is designed with four(4) lots covering the approximately 18.5-acre property, as illustrated on the attached land plan. Currently, only Sublot #4 (Cinema), which is located in the southeast corner of the property,has a proposed tenant and land plan and covers the largest area of the development. The Property currently has two (2) direct points of access, located to the north of the development off of Countryside Parkway and to the west off of Center Parkway. Both are full, non-signalized access points. There are also numerous additional secondary, or non-direct, points of access to the property via the drive aisles and connected parking lots of the adjacent retail and business/office/medical buildings surrounding the property off of Rt. 47 and US 34, such as McDonald's, Shell/Circle K, and Nelson's Funeral Home. However, primary access off of Rte. 47 does not currently exist for the property and the plan 1 Ord.No.2005-1OB Ordinance Designating the Countryside Center Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area Ord.No.2005-IOC Ordinance Allocating Financing for the Countryside Center Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area illustrates a non-signalized, right-in/right-out access to the site just south of the existing Funeral Home entrance. Cinema Plan &Parking As mentioned previously, the general Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the movie theater consists of a±38,500 cinema located on a 7.60-acre parcel (Sublot#4) in the southeast corner of the overall 18.5-acre site. The theater building will contain ten(10) 70-ft. 3D capable movie screens and stadium seating for up to 1,900 guests. All the theaters will offer digital projection and sound, upgraded leather seats and IMAX experience. The proposed parking for the theater will consist of 418 stalls, of which seven (7) are designated as handicapped accessible. One (1) off-street loading dock is also proposed in the rear of the movie theater building. Direct access to the theater heading south on Route 47 is proposed from the new Rte. 47 right- in/right-out entrance drive, or via the existing Countryside Parkway access drive. Direct access from US 34 to the theater will most-likely occur from the Center Parkway entrance. Staff Comments: Staff offers the following comments and recommendations for the Plan Commission to consider when reviewing the petitioner's proposed land plan and Special Use request for Planned Unit Development (PUD): • The parking spaces are narrower in width than the minimum required 8.5 feet for 90 degree stalls and do not provide one (1) landscaped islands for every 20 parking spaces. However, the Petitioner feels the variance is needed as the dimensions of the site do not permit the required number of spaces nor landscaped islands. Staff accepts limited islands to aisle-end medians only, as similar parking lot characteristics were approved in Kendall Marketplace. • Although it would be ideal to have the Route 47 entrance access point align with existing drive aisle on the east side (Aldi), a right-in/right-out access off of Rte 47 to the property rather than a signalized access will limit stop-lights on this roadway, and provide a much needed direct ingress and egress to the development. Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT)approval and permit will be needed for the proposed access off of IL Rte 47. • The proposed parking would require a variance for the number of stalls (662 requires/418 provided)which can be supported by staff. This is due to the cinema group's past experience and modeling of such uses and the industry standard that parking for movie theaters should be based upon capacity (typically 1 parking stall per 4 theater seats), rather than based on total square footage of building which is how the City's off-street parking requirements for theaters are currently measured. • There appears to be one (1) off-street loading dock for the theater, the code requires one for theaters 8,000 to 25,000 square feet and one (1) dock for each additional 50,000 sq. ft or fraction thereof. This theater is proposed to be 38,500 sq. ft. therefore two (2) docks would be required. Staff could support a variance based off of the Petitioner's experience. • The development will need to adequately address stormwater management for the development as part of their final engineering plans. • The proposed PUD plan is consistent with the current B-2 General Commercial zoning designation and the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Future Land Use designation as commercial. The proposed commercial land use is also consistent with the existing surrounding commercial zoning and land uses. • All other site development elements such as signage, building elevations/materials, landscaping plans and final engineering as part of the PUD plan will be reviewed by the Plan Commission at time of Preliminary Plan/Final Plat consideration. Conditions for Approval: Section 10-13-10 of the City's Zoning Ordinance establishes conditions by which the Plan Commission may recommend approval of a special use for Planned Unit Development. 1. In what respect does the design of the Planned Unit Development meet the requirements and design standards of the development standards and design criteria. 2. The extent to which the proposed plan deviates and/or requires waivers of the bulk regulations in the zoning ordinance and how the modifications in design standards from the subdivision control regulations fulfill the intent of those regulations. 3. The extent of public benefit produced by the Planned Unit Development, such as but not limited to, the adequacy of common open space and/or public recreational facilities provided; sufficient control over vehicular traffic; provision of public services; provision and protection of the reasonable enjoyment of the land. 4. The relationship and compatibility, beneficial or adverse, of the Planned Unit Development to the adjacent properties and nearby land uses. 5. The extent to which the Planned Unit Development fulfills the objectives of the future planning objectives or other planning policies of the City. Standards for Special Use: Section 10-14-6F of the City's Zoning Ordinance establishes standards for special use requests. No special use shall be recommended by the Plan Commission unless said commission shall find that: 1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety,morals, comfort or general welfare. 2. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. 3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. 4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. 5. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. 6. The special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the City Council pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan Commission. The Petitioner shall provide written responses to these standards at the public hearing as part of the findings of fact. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the proposed Kendall Crossing development as it consistent with zoning and land uses; it forwards the goals of the previously approved redevelopment agreements for the property entered into by the city with former owners/developers; and addresses a service need within the community. Staff also recommends a condition of approvin the Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development be made subject to submittal and approval of Preliminary Plan or Final Plat within one (1)year. Proposed Motion: In consideration of testimony presented during a Public Hearing on October 17, 2012 and discussions conducted at that meeting, the Plan Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request for Special Use Permit for Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for the purpose of redeveloping the approximately 18.5-acre property to be known as Kendall Crossing, including the construction of a new 38,500 square foot cinema complex, as presented by the Petitioner in a site plan prepared by RB & Associates Consulting Inc. dated September 10, 2012, subject to staff recommendation in a memorandum dated October 10, 2012 and further subject to {insert any additional conditions of the Plan Commission]... Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner's Application w/attachments. 2. Neighborhood Cinema Group—NCG Yorkville Cinemas Kendall Crossing PowerPoint Presentation 3. Copy of Public Notice. 43 United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 � E 'yya Fax: 630-553-3436 PC# APPLICATION &PETITION ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT,ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST Development Name:Kendall Crossing Date of Submission: October 2 2012 Requesting: Q Annexation 0 Zoning a Planned Unit Development 0 Special Use: 1. Name of Petitioner(s): James G. Ratos Address: 207 W. Kendall Drive, Yorkville, IL 60560 Phone Number: 630-269-6385 Fax Number: 630-553-5117 EmailAddress: Jimratos @gmail.ocn Relationship of Petitioner(s)to subject property: 0 Owner I Developer 0 Contract Purchaser 2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from#1: Bank of America If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: 3. a). (i). Street address and physical location of subject property: 18.5 acres of substantially vacant real property with Countryside Cent (ii). Zoning of surrounding parcels: North: B-3 South: B-3 East: S-3 West: B-3 b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit"A°. c). Total Acreage: 18.5 more or less d). Kendall County Parcel Numbers)of property: 02-28-104-015 e). Current Zoning Classification: B-3 Planned Unit Development f). Zoning Classification Requested: B-3 Pilanned Unit Development g). Is this property within City limits? X Yes No, requesting annexation United City orYorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised. 1.29.09 44 4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners and landowners within 500' entitled to notice of petition under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: Attach a separate list and label as Exhibit'B'. 5. List all governmental entities or agencies required to receive notice under Illinois law: None other than the United City of Yorkville 6. List the Illinois Business Tax Number(IBT#E)for the State of Illinois and names of businesses located on subject property to be annexed: N/A No 7. Does a flood plain exist on the subject property? 8. Do Electors reside on the subject property? No If so,they must execute this petition to annex. (Electors as defined by Illinois Law is a resident of the parcel who is a registered voter. Legal owners of the annexing parcel must sign the petition regardless of place of residence or legal voting status.) 9. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: DAnit-1 -J- Kramer Attorney: Name: Daniel J. Kramer Address: 1107A S. Bridge Street Yorkville, IL 60560 Phone Number: 630-553-9500 Fax Number: 630-553-5764 Email Address: dkramer @dankramerlaw.cOrn Engineer: Name: RB & Associates Address: Main Street Plano IL 60545 Phone Number: 630-552-7452 Fax Number: 630-552-7702 Email Address: Land Planner: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 1.29.09 45 10. Submit the following to the Community Development Department in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could de[ay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 35 copies. b. Appropriate filing fee(Please refer to page 4 of this application to"Petitioner Route, Step 1, Pees"and/or contact the Community Development Department for verification of this amount.) c. Concept or Preliminary Site Plan: 35 sets folded to fit in a 10°x 13"envelope. d. One CD containing one electronic copy(pdf)of each of the signed application (complete with exhibits) legal description, and site plan. In witness whereof the following petitioner(s)have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is contiguous two the United City of Yorkville. Date: 0-10 La Peti n (s) Sig (All legal prop r(owners'signatures must appear on this application.) ie am -orney for Petitioner bscribed and swam to before me this day ofoz:h2Q ,2002012 Notary Seal THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. "OFFICIAL SEAL" COLLEEN HANSON NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF ILLINOIS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES S 012012015 United City of Yorkville Annexahon,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 1.29.09 The legal description is as follows: LOT 7 (EXCEPT THAT PART DESCTRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST EASTERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 309.0 FEER TO A SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7 FPR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 80 DEGREES 56 MINUTES I 1 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 309.0 FEET TO A SOUTHEAT CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES, 45 MINUTES EAST ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7, 90.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST 140.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST 185.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERNMOST LINE OF LOT 6 OF SAID RESUBDIVISION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE NO. 47; THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERNMOST LINE 230.45 FEET TO THE SOUTHERNMOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 192.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 141.82 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 211.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING) OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 1, COUNTRYSIDE CENTER, UNIT NO. 1, YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS, AND ALSO THAT PART OF CENTER PARKWAY LYING NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY, AND ALSO THAT PART OF COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY LYING EASTERLY OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CENTER PARKWAY AND WESTERLY OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47, AND ALSO THAT PART OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE THAT IS 70.0 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AN CONCENTRIC WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY EXTENDED EASTERLY, AND NORTHERLY OF A LINE THAT IS 60.0 SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE MOST EASTERLY SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7 EXTENDED EASTERLY, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. P.I.N.# 02-28-104-015 ctpr United City of Yorkville 2� 0 800 Game Farm Road ° Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Es[ 1936 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Mx `moo INVOICE&WORKSHEET PETITION APPLICATION CONTACT: DEVELOPMENT/PROPERTY: Daniel I. Kramer Countlyside CnntCr—NCO Cinern a Acreage: 16.68 acres Date: 4-2542 Concept Plan Review: [X]Yes []NO S 500.00 Engineering Plan Review Deposit of 5500 due Amendment: []Yes []No $ $500.00 Fee due for each: (Annexation) (Plan) (Plat) (PUD) Annexation: []Yes []No $ $250.00,plus S10/acre for each acre over 5. #of acres: _5= x$10= +$250 Rezoning: ]]Yes []No $200.00,plus$10/acre for each acre over 5. #of acres: -5= x$l0 +$200 If annexing and rezoning,charge only 1 per acre fee. If rezoning to a PUD,charge PUD Development Fee-not Rezoning Fee. Special Use: []Yes []No $ $250.00,plus$I0/acre for each acre over 5. #of acres: -5= x$10= +$250 Zoning Variance: $85.00 []Yes []No $ Outside Consultants deposit of$500.00 due Preliminary Plan Fee: $500.00 [I Yes [I No S P.U.D.Fee: $500.00 [X]Yes [I No S-MIL- Final Plat Fee: 5500.00 [X]Yes []No S Snn.nn Engineering Plan Review De osit: [X]Yes []No S5.000.00 ]]Less than 1 acre=$1,000 due []Over 1 acre and less than 10 acres=$2,500 due [X]Over 10 acres and less than 40 acres=$5,000 due []Over 40 acres and less than 100 acres=510,000 due []Over 100 acres=$20,000 due Outside Consultants Deposit: [X]Yes []No S5,000,00 Legal,Land Planner,Zoning Coordinator,Environmental Services Annexation.Subdivision.Rezoning,andSneciai e:e: []Less than 2 acres=$1,000 due []Over 2 acres and less than 10 aces=S2,500 due [X]Over 10 acres=S5,000 due TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $11.500.00 Wo.0 0 Onus!D.V.Dep ARO!FW Sheet Wkn 'S'o cl United City of Yorkville o Cc un ty Seat of Kendall County -0 Petitioner Deposit Account I 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Iffinols, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Acknowledgment of Financial !�-S- Fax: 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkv11leJ1.us Responsibility y Development(Froperty Address: 'Pe" V. Petition/Approval Type:check appropriate box(es)of approval requested ❑Concept Plan Review ❑Amendment(Text)(Annexation)(Plat) DAnnexation ❑Rezoning ❑Special Use ❑Mile and%Review ❑Zoning Variance ❑Preliminary Plan ❑Final Plans )Q P.U.D. ❑Final Plat Petitioner Deposit Account Fund: It is the policy of the United City of Yorkville to require any petitioner seeking approval on a project or entitlement request to establish a Petitioner Deposit Account Fund to cover all actual expenses occurred as a result of processing such applications and requests. Typical requests requiring the establishment of a Petitioner Deposit Account Fund include, but are not limited to, plan review of development approvals/engineering permits. Deposit account funds may also be used to cover costs for services related to legal fees, engineering and other plan reviews, processing of other governmental applications, recording fees and other outside coordination and consulting fees.Each fund account is established with an initial deposit based upon the estimated cost for services provided in the INVOICE &WORKSHEET PETITION APPLICATION. This initial deposit is drawn against to pay for these services related to the project or request. Periodically throughout the project review/approval process, the Financially Responsible Party will receive an invoice reflecting the charges made against the account.At any time the balance of the fund account fall below ten percent (10%) of the original deposit amount, the Financially Responsible Party will receive an invoice requesting additional funds equal to one-hundred percent(100%)of the initial deposit if subsequent reviewaifees related to the project am required.In the event that a deposit account is not immediately replenished,review by the administrative staff,consultants,boards and comniseions may be suspended until the account is fully replenished.If additional fimils remain in the deposit a=unt at the completion of the project,the city will refund the balance to the Financially Responsible Panty.A written request must be submitted by the Financially Responsible Party to the city by the 16th of the month in order for the refund check to be processed and distributed by the 161h of the following month All refund checks will be made payable to the Financially Responsible Party and mailed to the address provided when the account was established, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Name/Company Name: Address: City: State: Zip Cole: James Ratos 207 W. Kendall Drive Yorkville M 60560 Telephone: Mobile-. Fax: E-mail: 630-269-6385 same 630-553-S]17 it cam Financially Responsible Party: I acknowledge and understand that as the Financially Responsible Party, expenses may exceed the estimated initial deposit and, when requested by the United City of Yorkville,I will,provide additional funds to maintain the required account balance.Further, the sale or other disposition of the property does not relieve the individual or Company/Corporation of their obligation to maintain a positive balance in the fund account, unless the United City of Yorkville approves a Change of Responsible Party and transfer of funds.Should the account go into deficit. 11 City work may stop until the requested replenishment deposit is received. Print Name:- J rs%�'N\4_5 Title: S ignature C1, h *The name of the individual and the person who signs this declaration must be the same. If a corporation is listed, a corporate officer must sign the declaration(President, Vice President, Chairman,Secretary or Treasurer) 7, W Ki 4 ' " Vff': -7 10"W, !A L J"1. -A Tit - ..1 lot, r ,• TT N air AS Ll _KIP i ti. 3 _I 9 -i G1 m N 'O 1 1 9 m�WWW [7 y r r r r m000DI^ rm m b o W N .ryl � C b Li Off m w G) r- Q A 0 A - > 0 ;D m � C { Z D Q U9j � n iD co n b m m rn A 0 C � s � m C -- y r z V Q (J D 9 COUNTRYSIDE CENTER '•' REDEVELOPMENT RB & ASSOCIATES q " -______ �• CONSULTING, INC ` SITE PLAN THEATER -°' 4 W MAIN STREET DESIGN FIRM A 0� ONLY CONCEPT PLANO.IL 80545 �s 1®4-004475 �� I PC# MIR IOU Public Hearing Signs The undersigned hereby states that they have acquired Public Hearing Signs from the United City of Yorkville's Community Development Department and agrees to return said signls to Yorkville City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, Immediately following the date of the public hearing. Petitioner or Representative agrees to pay to the United City of Yorkville a deposit of $50 for each sign. The deposit will be returned to the petitioner when the public hearing signts have been returned to the City. Petitioner or Representative further agrees to pay to the United City of Yorkville the full amount of the purchase price for each sign not returned to the United City of Yorkville within seven (7)days after the date of the public hearing. Date of Pickup: Number of Signs: Date of Public Hearing: Sign Due Date: Name of Petitioner: James Ratos Phone Number: 630-269-6385 Signature of Property Owns r/Repre sentative Address or location of Property Countryside Center Date Returned: Received by: D cl)i* 06 Memorandum EST. 1836 To: City Council From. Bart Olson,City Administrator r� CC: N _h �O Date: September 18,2012 <LE A Subject: Countryside Concept PUD Plan and incentive Agreement Summary Presentation of a concept PUD plan for Countryside Center,and discussion of requested development incentives for the project. Backaround This item was last discussed by the Administration Committee in March 2012.. At that meeting,the committee reviewed options for recruiting a developer to build on the site. Those options are itemized in the attached memo. The City Council ultimately decided to hold onto the bond proceeds and to signal to potential developers that the City Council would be open to development proposals that were outside the requirements of the original agreement(2005)or the revised agreement(2008),and would agree to use remaining TIF proceeds to develop the site. With that information in mind,YEDC Executive Director Lynn Dubajic approached various commercial developers about the Countryside site. After five months of business recruitment,Director Dubajic was able to get Jiin Ratos to commit to building the attached=40,000 square foot, 10-screen movie theater. The concept plan for the movie theater development is attached,and has been preliminarily reviewed by staff. Mr. Rats will be present to discuss various aspects of the development,and to seek feedback Deleted:Thepefifioncr from City Council on the site plan. From a Iand-use perspective,the petitioner has already notified staff that they will need the following list of development entitlements on the site,and staff has reviewed them and feels they are tentatively acceptable,simply based upon the scope of the development: 1) A right-in-right-out access onto southbound Route 47 in the middle of the development. The Countryside redevelopment agreement approved in 2008 authorized a full access onto Route 47 for this development(developer request). Staff is in favor of this request because it will limit stop-lights on Route 47,and will still provide a means of ingress and egress for the development. 2) The petitioner is requesting that all buildings in the Countryside development(not only the movie theater)have a sign on each side of any building. Current City requirements dictate that either one or two signs are allowed per building,depending on street frontage. Staff feels this is an acceptable request,as long as the signs do not directly face the residential areas,or if they face the residential areas that they are adequately screened from the residential areas. 3) On-site directional signage,which will be lower than eye-level. Current City requirements would minimize or restrict the amount of off-site signage. Staff feels this is an acceptable request if the signs are minimal in size and match the aesthetics of the development. 4) The petitioner is requesting a smaller number of parking spaces with a narrower stall than required by City Code,and is requesting that the requirement for landscaped islands be waived. First,the petitioner has consulted with the theater company,who believes that the parking requirements in our code are much higher than necessary, based on their past experiences. Second,the dimensions of the site do not permit the required number of spaces nor landscaped islands. Third,additional parking will be available when the adjacent outlots are developed. Staff is accepting of this request, as similar parking lot characteristics can be seen in Kendall Marketplace. 5) The original Countryside development had two large pylon-style signs in the medians on Countryside Parkway near Route 47 and Center Parkway near Route 34. The petitioner is requesting,off-site signs be authorized again. Staff feels the location ofi Deleted tntse the signs is n acceptable reques�as these signs have been historically located in the aetetee:u s medians,and both points provide fully signalized access to the development. 'Deleted:, The second half of the discussion on this development involves the incentives needed for the developer to recruit the theater to the site. The following list includes the requests by the developer and staffs preliminary thoughts on each request: G) Disbursement of TIF bond proceeds of$2,000,000 to the developer upon first day of operation of the movie theater(estimated to be November 15,2013). Staff is accepting of the timing of the request,and has informed the developer that the current bond proceeds available are only--$1.8 million. Staff's preliminary proposal would be disbursement of all available TIF bond proceeds(—$1.8m)and for the remaining gap to be funded by the City's portion of the amusement tax not pledged until the difference between$2,000,000 and actual disbursement has-been paid. 7) Access to the 1%business district tax proceeds for all businesses developed on the site,for the duration of the business district. Staff feels this is acceptable,as this was contemplated in the most recently approved TIF redevelopment plan(2008). The business district was established in 2009 and by law may remain in effect for a maximum of 23 years from date of original approval. Since all disbursements of business district taxes must be for infrastructure and other costs within the business district,staff proposes no cap on the business district tax incentive,other than the expiration of the business district. All disbursement_.,,shall require proof of OWN costs. 8) Access to%z of the City's amusement tax received from the movie theater for 10 years. The City's amusement tax is currently 3%,which means the developer would have access to the amusement tax for one and one-half percentage points of the amusement tax. 4) A.,contem plated in item;;6 above.staff would ra use the gLip between the available l)_ond_Rroceeds and,X2_()tlil.f)ii6l be funded with Tile Other- z nCthe C;itv's amusement tax. When the ?OO.OUO =a is eliminated.the amusement tax would then be~hared 50/50 for the remainder of the term in item#S. Recommendation SIaff ret nests leedback on the proposed site plan. develo,ntent pronosals.and incenti%.e proposals. a� a °-� Memorandum esr. _` 106 To: City Council Prom: Bart Olson,City Administrator -� CC: �p Date: September 18,2012 1,E Ik,�? Subject: Countryside Concept PUD Plan and Incentive Agreement Summary Presentation of a concept PUD plan for Countryside Center,and discussion of requested development incentives for the project. Background This item was last discussed by the Administration Commitlee in March 2012.. At that meeting,the committee reviewed options for recruiting a developer to build on the site. Those options are itemized in the attached memo- The City Council ultimately decided to hold onto the bond proceeds and to signal to potential developers that the City Council would be open to development proposals that were outside the requirements of the original agreement(2005)or the revised agreement(2008),and would agree to use remaining TIF proceeds to develop the site. With that information in mind,YEDC Executive Director Lynn Dubajic approached various commercial developers about the Countryside site. After five months of business recruitment,Director Dubajic was able to get Jim Ratos to commit to building the attached_40,000 square foot, 10-screen movie theater. The concept plan for the movie theater development is attached,and has been preliminarily reviewed by staff. Mr. Rato will be present to discuss various aspects of the development,and to seek feedback Detetedc The petboner _ from City Council on the site plan. From a land-use perspective,the petitioner has already notified staff that they will need the following list of development entitlements on the site,and staff has reviewed them and feels they are tentatively acceptable,simply based upon the scope of the development: 1) A right-in-right-out access onto southbound Route 47 in the middle of the development. The Countryside redevelopment agreement approved in 2008 authorized a full access onto Route 47 for this development(developer request). Staff is in favor of this request because it will limit stop-lights on Route 47,and will still provide a means of ingress and egress for the development. 2) The petitioner is requesting that all buildings in the Countryside development(not only the movie theater)have a sign on each side of any building. Current City requirements dictate that either one or two signs are allowed per building,depending on street frontage. Staff feels this is an acceptable request,as long as the signs do not directly face the residential areas,or if they face the residential areas that they are adequately screened from the residential areas. 3) On-site directional signage, which will be lower than eye-level. Current City requirements would minimize or restrict the amount of off-site signage. Staff feels this is an acceptable request if the signs are minimal in size and match the aesthetics of the development. 4) The petitioner is requesting a smaller number of parking spaces with a narrower stall than required by City Code,and is requesting that the requirement for landscaped islands be waived. First,the petitioner has consulted with the theater company,who believes that the parking requirements in our code are much higher than necessary, based on their past experiences. Second,the dimensions of the site do not permit the required number of spaces nor landscaped islands. Third,additional parking will be available when the adjacent outlots are developed. Staff is accepting of this request, as similar parking lot characteristics can be seen in Kendall Marketplace. 5) The original Countryside development had two large pylon-style signs in the medians on Countryside Parkway near Route 47 and Center Parkway near Route 34. The petitioner is requesting off-site signs be authorized again. Staff feels the location of Deleted: dae the is n acceptable requegas these signs have been historically located in the `Deleted:in[s�s medians,and both points provide fully signalized access to the development. Deleted. — - The second half of the discussion on this development involves the incentives needed for the developer to recruit the theater to the site. The following list includes the requests by the developer and staffs preliminary thoughts on each request: 6) Disbursement of TIF bond proceeds of$2,000,000 to the developer upon first day of operation of the movie theater(estimated to be November 15,2013). Staff is accepting of the timing of the request,and has informed the developer that the current bond proceeds available are only—$1.8 million. Staff's preliminary proposal would be disbursement of all available TIF bond proceeds(41.8m)and for the remaining J gap to be funded by the City's portion of the amusement tax not pledged until the difference between$2,000,000 and actual disbursement has been paid. 7) Access to the I%business district tax proceeds for all businesses developed on the site,for the duration of the business district. Staff feels this is acceptable,as this was contemplated in the most recently approved TIF redevelopment plan(2008). The business district was established in 2009 and by law may remain in effect for a maximum of 23 years from date of original approval. Since all disbursements of business district taxes must be for infrastructure and other costs within the business district,staff proposes no cap on the business district tax incentive,other than the expiration of the business district. All disbursements shall require proof of eligible costs. 8) Access to 1/2 of the City's amusement tax received from the movie theater for 10 years. The City's amusement tax is currently 3%,which means the developer would have access to the amusement tax for one and one-half percentage points of the amusement tax. 9) As conlem laced in itern::6 above.staff would propose the gap between tale available bori{I.proceeds and 52(IQ {)Ui)be funded t itlt the other '-i of kite City's amusement tax Wlien the -.$200,000 gap is eliminated,the amusement tax Nyould then be shared 50.'50 for the remainder of the term in itern �8 Recommendation Staff requests feedback on the proposed site plan.derelo pment proposal,,.and incentive aro osals. Page 1 of 1 Daniel J Kramer From: Bart Olson [BOlson @yorkville.il.us] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 10:18 AM To: Bart Olson; Daniel J Kramer; realestate;jimratos @gmail.com; Lynn Dubajic Cc: Kathleen Field Orr; Rob Fredrickson; Krysti Barksdale-Noble; Laura Schraw; Eric Dhuse; Brad Sanderson; Jeff Weckbach; Gary Golinski Subject: RE: Draft Countryside memo, for your final review One minor staff recommendation change in the section about medians. In Kendall Marketplace and a few other developments around town,we've requested that landscaped islands always be present at the bookend of a parking row.They help provide a physical separation between parking spaces and lot alley. In a couple places on the plan, we've got parking lot rows that end without landscaped median. We would request that those rows be bookended by landscaped medians. The memo will be adjusted accordingly. For whatever its worth, I had also heard that comment made by an alderman who had seen the plan. Bart Olson City Administrator United City of Yorkville 630-553-8537 direct 630-553-4350 City Hall 630-308-0582 cell bolson @yorkville.il.us City of Yorkville 2.0: Facebook,Twitter, and YouTube From: Bart Olson Sent:Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:18 AM To: 'dkramer @dankramerlaw.com'; 'realestate; 'jimratos @gmail.com'; 'Lynn Dubajic' Cc: Kathleen Field Orr; Rob Fredrickson; Krysti Barksdale-Noble; Laura Schraw; Eric Dhuse; 'Brad Sanderson'; Jeff Weckbach; Gary Golinskf Subject: Draft Countryside memo, for your final review Importance: High Please review immediately. Track changes are shown. Bart Olson City Administrator United City of Yorkville 630-553-8537 direct 630-553-4350 City Hall 630-308-0582 cell bolson@yorkville.il.us City of Yorkville 2.0: Facebook,Twitter, and YouTube 9/20/2012 Page 1 of 1 Daniel J Kramer From: Bart Olson [BOlson @yorkville.il.us] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 10:18 AM To: Bart Olson; Daniel J Kramer; realestate;jimratos @gmail.com; Lynn Dubajic Cc: Kathleen Field Orr; Rob Fredrickson; Krysti Barksdale-Noble; Laura Schraw; Eric Dhuse; Brad Sanderson; Jeff Weckbach; Gary Golinski Subject: RE: Draft Countryside memo, for your final review One minor staff recommendation change in the section about medians. In Kendall Marketplace and a few other developments around town, we've requested that landscaped islands always be present at the bookend of a parking row. They help provide a physical separation between parking spaces and lot alley. In a couple places on the plan, we've got parking lot rows that end without landscaped median. We would request that those rows be bookended by landscaped medians. The memo will be adjusted accordingly. For whatever its worth, I had also heard that comment made by an alderman who had seen the plan. Bart Olson City Administrator United City of Yorkville 630-553-8537 direct 630-553-4350 City Hall 630-308-0582 cell bolson @yorkville.il.us City of Yorkville 2.0: Facebook,Twitter,and YouTube From: Bart Olson Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:18 AM To: 'dkramer @dankramerlaw.com'; 'reaiestate; 'jimratos @gmail.com; 'Lynn Dubajic' Cc: Kathleen Field Orr; Rob Fredrickson; Krysti Barksdale-Noble; Laura Schraw; Eric Dhuse; 'Brad Sanderson'; Jeff Weckbach; Gary Golinski Subject: Draft Countryside memo, for your final review Importance: High Please review immediately. Track changes are shown. Bart Olson City Administrator United City of Yorkville 630-553-8537 direct 630-553-4350 City Hall 630-308-0582 cell bolson@yorkville.il.us City of Yorkville 2.0: Facebook,Twitter, and YouTube 9/20/2012 Page I of 2 Daniel J Kramer From: realestate Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 91:24 AM To: Daniel J Kramer Subject: FW. Draft Countryside memo, for your final review If this email required a response, please respond to dkramer@dankramerlaw.com Very Truly Yours, Daniel J. Kramer Attorney at Law 1 I 07 S. Bridge Street Yorkville, IL. 60560 Phone-630.553.9500 Fax-630.553.5764 NOTICE: This communication is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act found at 18 USC 2510 et.seq. and is intended to remain confidiential and is subject to the applicable attorney/client and or work product privileges. If you are not the intended recipient of this message,or if this message has been addressed to you in error,please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and all attachments. Do not deliver,distribute or copy this message and/or any attachments and do not disclose the contents or take any action in reliance upon the information contained in this communication or any attachments if you are not the intended recipient. From: Bart Olson [mailto:BO]son @yorkville.il.us] Sent: Thu 9/20/2012 10:18 AM To: Bart Olson; Daniel J Kramer; realestate; jimratos @gmail.com; Lynn Dubajic Cc: Kathleen Field Orr; Rob Fredrickson; Krysti Barksdale-Noble; Laura 5chraw; Eric Dhuse; Brad Sanderson;Jeff Weckbach; Gary Golinski Subject: RE: Draft Countryside memo, for your final review One minor staff recommendation change in the section about medians. In Kendall Marketplace and a few other developments around town, we've requested that landscaped islands always be present at the bookend of a parking row.They help provide a physical separation between parking spaces and lot alley. In a couple places on the plan, we've got parking lot rows that end without landscaped median. We would request that those rows be bookended by landscaped medians. The memo will be adjusted accordingly. For whatever its worth, I had also heard that comment made by an alderman who had seen the plan. Bart Olson City Administrator United City of Yorkville 630-553-8537 direct 630-553-4350 City Hall 630-308-0582 cell bolson @yorkville.il.us City of Yorkville 2.0: Facebook,Twitter, and YouTube 9/20/2012 Page 2 of 2 From: Bart Olson Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 9:18 AM To; 'dkramer @dankramerlaw.com'; 'realestate'; 'jimratos @gmail.com'; 'Lynn Dubajic' Cc: Kathleen Field Orr; Rob Fredrickson; Krysti Barksdale-Noble; Laura Schraw; Eric Dhuse; 'Brad Sanderson'; Jeff Weckbach; Gary Golinski Subject: Draft Countryside memo, for your final review Importance; High Please review immediately. Track changes are shown. Bart Olson City Administrator United City of Yorkville 630-553-8537 direct 630-553-4350 City Hall 630-308-0582 cell bolson @yorkville.il.us City of Yorkville 2.0: Facebook,Twitter, and YouTube 9/20/2012 CINEM�IS WWW. NCGMOVIES . COM Neighborhood Cinema Group NCG Yorkville Cinemas Kendall Crossing ie x \ 1,r ` a 3 A V c V ` C?h k P f 1 ' `•�q.1,'. r - E B B I t f- 51, 4 P \ NCG Yorkville Cinemas Kendall Crossing Neighborhood Cinema Group NCG Yorkville Cinemas Neighborhood Cinema Group is a Family owned and operated theater company since 1985 � Headquartered in Owosso, MI "NCG" currently operates 14 Theaters with 135 screens NCG prefers to operate in smaller communities NCG is active in all communities it operates in tk NCG Currently has theaters in Michigan, Indiana, Tennessee and Georgia NCG will only build One theater at a time r Cc EMAS L h L lu �� a son ■■ � I Neighborhood Cinema Group AYOTTE r o u p NCG Yorkville Cinemas I A R H . T E T S STELE TIOII )c; mr� !EL�T�PXWN Q :Q ?1pIER ELEVATION r, I'M PAEx5BSV91R6 xl Sf 192AI (L D U 0 0 0 z: cc: co LLI ON T-R--- MM, SCWN 0-1 NO,,UP 5=0 RA-200-3 Neighborhood Cinema Group NCG Yorkville Cinemas l i NCG ,wAl Al NCG Yorkville Cinemas r� r '1 vNIwE* POW �w NCG Yorkville Cinemas NCG Yorkville Cien. e.. m. , Proposed Theater approximately 37,500 square feet NCG Will employ approximately 50 people 100% Digital projection and sound 10 Screens with 3D capability and seating for 1900 guests 100% Stadium Seating Ink NEG Xt e — Pro-prr[et-ary-t-o-IEG 70 ft. screen , Upgraded Leather Recliners, not limited by releases from IMAX this theater can play any movie in NCG Xtreme ! Including 3D Free Refills on all sizes of drinks and popcorn Proposed open date November 15, 2013 C-G ��NEMAS WWW.NCGMOVIES.COM Neighborhood Cinema Group MAYOIFEg r u p NCG Yorkville Cinemas A R C H I T E C T S PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION PC 2012-09 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT James G.Ratos,Petition- er,has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville,Ken- dall County, Illinois, requesting Planned Unit Development (PUD)concept plan approval for the Countryside Center proper- ty for the purpose of constructing a new 38,500 square foot cine- ma complex. The real property consists of approximately 16.62 acres located immediately north of US Route 34,west of Illinois Route 47,generally south of Countryside Parkway and east of Center Parkway,in Yorkville,Illinois. The legal description is as follows: LOT 7 (EXCEPT THAT PART DESCTRIBED AS FOLLOWS:COMMENCING AT THE MOST EASTERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 309.0 FEER TO A SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7 FPR A POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE SOUTH 80 DEGREES 58 MI- NUTES 11 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 309.0 FEET TO A SOUTHEAT CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES,45 MINUTES EAST ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7, 90.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST 140.35 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST 185.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN- NING;AND ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERNMOST LINE OF LOT 6 OF SAID RESUBDIVISION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE NO. 47; THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERNMOST LINE 230.45 FEET TO THE SOUTHERNMOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6;THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 192.30 FEET;THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 141.82 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 211.98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING)OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 1, COUNTRYSIDE CENTER, UNIT NO. 1, YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS,AND ALSO THAT PART OF CENTER PARKWAY LYING NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY, AND ALSO THAT PART OF COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY LY- ING EASTERLY OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CEN- TER PARKWAY AND WESTERLY OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47,AND ALSO THAT PART OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE THAT IS 70.0 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AN CONCENTRIC WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTRYSIDE PARK- WAY EXTENDED EASTERLY,AND NORTHERLY OF A LINE THAT IS 60.0 SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE MOST EASTERLY SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7 EX- TENDED EASTERLY,IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. P.I.N.#02-28-104-015 The proposed PUD concept plan application materials are on file with the City Clerk. NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the Plan Commission for the United City of Yorkville will conduct a public hearing on said application on Wednesday,October 17,2012 at 7 p.m.at the United City of Yorkville City Council Chambers,800 Game Farm Road,Yorkville,Illinois,60560. The public hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice being published. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. Any written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville City Clerk, City Hall,800 Game Farm Road,Yorkville,Illinois,and will be ac- cepted up to the date of the public hearing. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois. BETH WARREN,City Clerk By:Lisa Pickering,Deputy Clerk Ad 411980 Pub:Oct 1,2012 1 2 3 4 5 *11k7 i^t c ''•'q •I ,�i 'I. ', Y' i 3 ' ��CV' _ � r • J V jo 0` '"y.. '. - . • • r - r �.; t,WI-v7'r," - LIJ 2 Lo a, ' S z1 ► , f, y e - - - - -- -— ; - - _ SCALE:1"=100' y ' w � r � ,ti `s Zo , _ • ,r �PGA . - - .` Lid z At- n 1 . O W O 2i z Sublot 2 C Yom• �'` � ` — / PARKING SPACES Funeral � �_ Home \ • PLACE •• REQUIRED TARGET ACTUAL • REGULAR HANDICAP y r \ Sublot 3 r .-__ • 1 x k t .,e _ Sublot 1 I THEATER 662 400 408 7 TOTAL 415 tl \ Q ilk LY low A LD `--- � Uj 6 6 I B 6 0 IOU SUBLOTS/BUILDINGS PLACE BLDG AREA CAPACITY PROPERTY '0\00t I _ SUB LOT 1 - - 6.67 AC o ° w° . o 0 U B LOT 2 1 03 AC .fi a a cn¢ LLJ • � � � _ - ; 4 ti SUBLOT 3 1 .32 AC o w f W o m WN a ; SUBLOT 4 Lm Zm o aN wz -, , 38,500 1 ,984 7.60 AC W° �° Y� LL C J THEATER ° o N Uj LLI y;rf ti Z _ rI _ 1 ;�` t O M I 4 ` s~• �'. . - - - _ _ O O ; . v O z r � Psi I °. �I@t N J ry to —r�� -a � Q //'•�� LLJ ILIJ AQ4 Uj to _ J e r' r a ;`1 k-1 r ef I - _ , - - - _ J - r ,,�,,• : . r ., -- r r' ;_ ' ."' DRAWING �. ry_ NUMBER C- 1100 p }/ SHEET X OF Y ��° c'r Memorandum ' -0 To: Plan Commission EST. -� 1836 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director o CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: October 11, 2012 °� Kendae counTy �� Subject: City Council Action Updates <kE Purpose The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Plan Commission with an update on the action taken by the City Council on the items recently presented to and recommended by the Plan Commission at their previous meeting. These updates will be provided as part of each meeting packet going forward and staff requests any feedback from the Plan Commission on additional information to be included in the future. City Council Action: The City Council reviewed the Plan Commission's recommendations regarding the following items during their meeting held on September 25, 2012 and unanimously supported the proposed mile and 1/2 review requests as indicated in their votes below: • PC 2012-06 Success in the Suburbs, Inc. — request for amendment to a Special Use permit for a public horse facility within the Equestrian Estates at Legacy Farm Subdivision in Kendall County. Colosimo-aye; Koch-aye; Milschewski-aye; Kot-aye; Munns-aye; Funkhouser-aye; Spears- aye; Teeling-aye. 8 ayes; 0 nays; 0 abstentions • PC 2012-07 Souk Hemintharong - request for rezoning of the subject property from R-1 One Family Residence District to A-1 Agricultural within the County. Colosimo-aye; Koch-aye; Milschewski-aye; Kot-aye; Munns-aye; Funkhouser-aye; Spears- aye; Teeling-aye. 8 ayes; 0 nays; 0 abstentions 1 2012-10-10 09:57 IDOT D3 Project Imp. (815) 434-8543 >> 16305537575 P 2/2 WORKMWW mom IT'S YOUR RESPONSIBILITY ® FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Herb Jung 815-434-8427 Fax: 815-434-8599 TDD: 800-5260844 Ottawa, IL, October 10, 2012 The Illinois Department of Transportation has announced that following months of delay due to utility relocation efforts, construction activities have begun on the IL 47 reconstruction project through Yorkville, from north of IL 71 to north of U.S. 34. A$29,392,414.16 contract has been awarded to "D" Construction, Inc. of Coal City, IL for the project, which consists of pavement reconstruction, lane additions and traffic signals along with extensive storm sewer and water main work. Completion of the project is not expected until (approximately) fall of 2015. This project, due to its extent and nature, will have a significant impact on businesses and residents along the route as well as motorists traveling through the work zone. Major traffic delays and inconveniences can be expected and motorists should seek alternate routes to avoid delays. A signed truck route detour is in place and semi traffic traveling on IL 47 are advised to use it to avoid delays and prevent further congestion in the work zone. Motorists traveling through the work zone should be alert for slow or stopped traffic, flaggers and all other workers. (Contract No. 66671) Illinois Department of Transportation