The URL can be used to link to this page

Economic Development Packet 2009 08-04-09 `,`�o CITY o United City of Yorkville 800 Game Faun Road EST. '� 1636 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 r AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, August 4, 2009 7:00 PM City Hall Conference Room Minutes for Correction/Approval: July 7, 2009 New Business 1. EDC 2009-32 Building Permit Report for June 2009 2. EDC 2009-33 Plan Commission Report for July 2009 3. PC 2009-12 Cannonball Trails Preliminary PUD and Final Plat of Subdivision Items Recommended by Plan Commission for Approval: Old Business: 1. EDC 2009-29 Prestwick Request for Payment Plan and Fee Lock Extension Additional Business: 2008 City Council Goals- Economic Development Committee "Evaluate fiscal incentives. " Alderman Golinski Travis Miller Susan Mika "Increase development standards, with heavy emphasis on multi-family. Alderman Werderich Travis Miller "Facilitate large lot planning areas, with exploration on agricultural homestead zoning district, and heavy emphasis on studying how we can Alderman Werderich Travis Miller make large lots economically viable in the market place," "Bridges to river islands." Alderman Werderich Bart Olson "Open s ace acquisition." Alderman Sutcliff Bart Olson "Strengthen the city's role in economic development activities." Alderman Munns Brendan McLaughlin Travis Miller "Land use planning adjacent to Route 47, with research on how we can Travis Miller help Route 47 expansion via contact with Springfield." UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, August 4, 2009 7:00 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. July 7, 2009 ❑ Approved as Presented ❑ Approved with Corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2009-32 Building Permit Report for June 2009 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2009-33 Plan Commission Report for July 2009 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PC 2009-12 Cannonball Trails Preliminary PUD and Final Plat of Subdivision ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OLD BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2009-29 Prestwick Request for Payment Plan and Fee Lock Extension ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 1 of 5 DRA UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 7pm City Conference Room In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Gary Golinski Alderman Rose Spears Alderman Wally Werderich Alderman Robyn Sutcliff Other City Officials: Mayor Valerie Burd City Administrator Brendan McLaughlin Community Development Director Travis Miller Stephanie Boettcher, Senior Planner Other Guests- Tony Scott,Kendall County Record .Tames Olguin, Goldstine Skiodzki Russian Nemec and Hoft Phil Stuepfert, SEC Group Paul Daniels, Bridge Street Plaza Robert Nelson, Attorney Lynn Dubajic, YEDC Todd Milliron The meeting was called to order by Chairman Gary Golinski at 7:00pm. Minutes for Correction/Approval: June 2, 2009 The minutes were approved as read. New Business: 1. EDC 2009-26 Building Permit Report for May 2009 There was no discussion (out of sequence) 4. EDC 200929 Prestwick Request for Payment Plan and Fee Lock Extension Travis reported that there are two sums of money that have not been paid per the Annexation Agreement. He said that over the winter, Stephanie Boettcher had reviewed all Annexation Agreements and set up an automated fee lock schedule. It was realized at this time, that the payments had not been made by Prestwick for the Library or the Fire District. Prestwick has requested a 2-year extension on these payments and on the fee lock. The fee lock extension requires a Public Hearing before the Plan Commission to amend the Annexation Agreement. The Fire District trustees have been notified and will be meeting soon to consider this request. Chairman Golinski suggested that the Library Board be notified for a recommendation as well. Attorney James Olguin spoke on behalf of Prestwick. The reason for the request is due to the slowdown of the current real estate market with no recent sales. Alder-woman Spears Page 2 of 5 suggested that a committee decision be delayed in view of the 6-month grace period granted in a letter from the City. This would allow the City to assess the budget and also receive input from the Fire and Library Boards. Other committee members concurred. This item will be brought back to committee when all the information is obtained. (The payments are due in November). (out of sequence) Old Business: 1. EDC 2009-25 Bridge Street Plaza Redevelopment Agreement Paul Daniels was present on behalf of Bridge Street Plaza. He is the owner of the old hotel property at the northwest corner of Hydraulic and Rt. 47. His company, Investor Tools, moved into this property about 15 years ago. He said that remodeling the building is cost-prohibitive and he is currently working with Mason Oliver on a demolition plan. Demolition costs were expected to be about $108,000,but he stated there are serious environmental problems with asbestos being found. increasing the costs to about $132,000. Remediation will take approximately 10 days to 3 weeks to complete. When discussing demolition, Travis noted that in a previous meeting, the committee members had requested a timeline of action. He said this is a unique agreement because there are no plans for redevelopment, however, the project is TIF-eligible. The agreement is executed prior to the demolition occurring, but no money is paid until demolition occurs and a redevelopment plan is submitted and commences. Mr. Daniels said he was planning to seed the area with grass after demolition, but would also consider gravel for parking. He would allow parking in the lot with proper signage so that cars are not abandoned. Language will be included in the agreement to reimburse the City if a redevelopment plan is brought forth quicker than anticipated. Mr. Daniels said he would not charge the City for using the land as parking spots. Alderwoman Spears said there is no money to install a parking lot at this time. She also cited the example of Countryside that has not been developed yet. She said with no development plan, she would find it difficult to allow TIF money or tax dollars to demolish the building. She said she is not in favor of a TIF due to the Countryside situation. Mayor Burd added that the City has had 3 TIF's that worked well, property values increased and the schools reaped the benefits. She cited the Industrial Park as a positive example. She said Mr. Daniels' TIF is in place already. She added that the downtown is a prime area that needs help and that the public needs to be educated that TIF's do not use tax dollars. Attorney Orr has reviewed the agreement noting a couple minor revisions. If conditions of the agreement are not met, the agreement could be nullified. There was a brief discussion regarding language talking about"performance". Attorney Orr will be asked to provide a legal opinion on this question. Alderman Werderich asked that a"cap" amount of demolition money should be added. This item will be forwarded to the City Council with adjustments. Page 3 of 5 (out oFsequence) Items Recommended by Plan Commission for Approval: I. PC 2009-05 Haehner Annexation Agreement This matter has been before the Plan Commission on two occasions. There were concerns regarding density and zoning with a compromise finally being reached. The recommendation was for annexation with R2 zoning and a cap of 200 units. Mayor Burd stated this annexation agreement was a request made by the City to continue with the City's plan to move south towards Caton Farm Road. The City currently has several pre-annexation agreements to allow properties to become contiguous. There are no current plans to develop this property. Alderman Werderich said he was not in favor of the agreement because he feels the City should conform to the Comp Plan and the present agreement would be a major deviation. The Plan states this area is to be suburban neighborhood (which provides for less density) and more open space. Alderman Werderich also asked how existing pre-annexation agreements tie into this agreement and what is the status of other negotiations. Mr. Miller replied that this property is contiguous to Yorkshire Farms. He also added that other landowners recognize that this is a good time to negotiate agreements while development is slow. It was noted that open space was not included when figuring the density of the property. Travis added that the lots could be 25-30% less dense after considering open space, roads, creek and detention. Mayor Burd asked Travis to recalculate and present the resulting density. Mr. Miller said notices have gone out for a Public Hearing on July 14`h. (out oFsequence) 2. Integrated Transportation Plan —Draft Plan Presentation Phil Stuepfert of the SEC Group presented highlights of the transportation plan and he said it is almost finished. There was input from City staff, SEC and the public. He said the goal was to make Yorkville more pedestrian-friendly and added benefits would be improved health and safety. One of the first priorities of this plan is trails. Funding for this project will come from grants, local funding sources and developers. There was a brief discussion of moving the storefronts in downtown Yorkville to the backs of the building. The City will be looking at that area with consideration of the anticipated Rt. 47 improvements. Stormwater management in that area was also discussed and "rain gardens" were suggested. The canoe chute and riverfront area were also mentioned. Alderman Sutcliff asked who would track the progress going forward. Alderman Golinski said the next step should be to form an implementation team and it should be discussed at the next committee meeting. It was suggested by Alderman Spears that residents from each Ward should be included along with Park Board members and a cross-section of others. Mayor Burd said the group should be kept small, approximately 5-7 members. Page 4 of 5 There will be a revision of the plan to be presented at a future Council meeting. Chairman Golinski said the Park Board should have a chance to review the plan first and they will be invited to the Council meeting. (out of sequence) S. EDC 2009-30 CMAP Full Circle Grant(Tree Survey) — Inter-Governmental Agreement with Kane County Regarding CMAP Grant Funding The Committee commented that this is a very sound plan. Mr. Miller said it will not be possible to finish the entire project by November 30th and it is hoped that the project can be delayed. Originally it was hoped that college interns would be hired to do the work and the work was intended to be done in the summer. However, due to a time factor, others who can identify trees may be hired instead. Staff recommends approval of the agreement knowing that there may be amendments. Mayor Burd added that the project was recommended by the Green Committee. This item will move to the next Council meeting consent agenda. 6. EDC 2009-31 Com Ed Lease Agreement for Trail Attorney Orr has reviewed the agreement and it now moves to the consent agenda of City Council. Old Business: The Zoning Commission is discussing new zoning classifications and will also focus on administrative chapters. The next meeting will be July 29`11 at 4prn. Additional Business: Mayor Burd shared information on an idea to preserve the old county jail. It has been identified as one of the 10 most endangered buildings in Illinois. Travis Miller said there was an agreement made in 2000 between the City and IDOT. IDOT would compensate the City with 20 parking spaces lost from the Rt. 47 improvements and the City was to identify the location for these spaces. IDOT would then acquire the land on behalf of the City since the property must be City-owned. The jail property is the closest property to the downtown that could be acquired. The northern half of the lot would be used for parking to replace spots lost on Rt. 47. The plan has been shared with IDOT and they are open to purchasing the property and to fund the grading and construction of the retaining wall. The County requests confirmation of the City's intentions by August. Mayor Burd has spoken with persons who are willing to do the renovations at no cost. She hopes it could be a possible museum or space for archives. Page 5 of 5 Two appraisals at City expense are needed and must be certified. Cost of acquisition and total improvements are estimated at $800,000 according to Travis. IDOT will also examine the building for any potential hazardous materials. Regarding committee liaisons selected last month, Chairman Golinski said Alderman Munns had been attending YEDC meetings and will continue to do so. There was no other business and the meeting adjourned at 9:1 3pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young BUILDING PERMIT REPORT United City of Yorkville Department of Building Safety and Zoning June 2009 Types of Permits 2-Family Commercial Number of Permits Issued SFD tBg9iarclnX200s, Afultiple-Family ter=;rcnrnx2oob,cmrgnrrrrcrrrcdra Industrial Miscellaneous* Total Construction Cost 2 permits—f Sr--rime) Brr;ldnrrn) June 2009 67 8 0 0 0 0 59 $7.181,252.00 Calendar Year 2009 292 21 0 0 10 0 261 $14,020,062.00 Fiscal Year 2009 134 11 0 0 1 0 122 $7,181,252.00 dune 2008 108 26 0 0 5 0 77 $8,145,200.00 Calendar Year 2008 504 87 6 0 24 0 387 $56.406,944.00 Fiscal Year 2008 220 42 4 0 7 0 167 $39,773,027.00 June 2007 I38 45 2 0 3 0 88 $9,320,515.00 Calendar Year 2007 643 227 6 0 23 0 387 $72,320,655.00 Fiscal Year 2007 279 81 2 0 6 0 190 $16,764,860.00 .June 2006 142 46 0 1 8 0 87 $15,002,075.00 Calendar Year 2006 866 439 28 5 25 0 369 $94,869,428.00 Fiscal Year 2006 326 118 8 2 11 0 187 $33.799,395,00 June 2005 172 55 0 0 3 0 114 $11,027,814.00 Calendar Year 2005 1 623 224 5 0 2.5 0 364 $57,249,115.00 Fiscal Year 2005 306 98 0 0 9 0 199 $23,547,659.00 r Permit Number Y-05-0012 was raided,Ilion nnly 62.1 of 614 as..igned permit number Hyre arlrrallr a`ed. WAcellonemrs includes addilians,remodelling,garages,sheds,.swimming ponls,decA s,fire alarmisprindter plan reriews,murrieipal projects,etc. Report prepared by: Barbara J.Deamer,MCP,Department of Building Safety and Zoning 1 OF) �'W �,,�t�D C►Ty Ov, -33 Memorandum To: EDC/City Council Esr -� �--�_ pass Prom: Travis Miller, Community Development Director .t ` CC: Brendan McLaughlin, City Administrator 0.� *1161 Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Y 30 Date: Jul a 2009 Subject: Plan Commission Actions July 8, 2009 PC 2009-10 Kendall Land Development, LLC—Request for Rezoning R-2 to PUD (Kendallwood Estates) Motion to recommend rezoning to PUD. 0 ayes; S no Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0"�' Legal ❑ �� EST tiT_ 1636 Finance ❑ I-��— Engineer ❑ Tracking Number a � ii :i City Administrator F] Consultant El cM q l� i Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Cannonball Trails Preliminary PUD and Final Plat of Subdivision Meeting and Date: EDC/Aug. 4, 2009 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Travis Miller Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: EDC EST. � 1936 From: Travis Miller, Community Development Director �t �~� CC: Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk(for distribution) 0� �p� Date: July 30, 2009 <L r; Subject: PC2009-12 Cannonball Trails (Preliminary PUD Plan/Final Plat) Background The City approved the current Planned Unit Development and Annexation Agreement for this property August 10, 2000 and approved an amendment to this agreement as well as a rezoning to PUD on July 22, 2008. Plan Council reviewed the plan submittal Thursday July 30, 2009 and have requested modifications to the plans submitted(Preliminary/Final Engineering Plan, Landscape Plan, Subdivision Plat) be made and these plans to be resubmitted August 4, 2009 for Plan Commission review scheduled for August 12, 2009. Staff Comments and Recommendations. The Preliminary PUD and Final Subdivision plat proposed is in substantial conformance with the PUD agreement and the Concept PUD Plan approved for this property. Attached for your reference are the staff reports reviewed with the petitioner at the July 30, 2009 Plan Council meeting. The petitioner is addressing the identified items and staff anticipates the August 4, 2009 Plan Commission submittal to address these continents. The revised Preliminary PUD Plan set will be the subject of a public hearing scheduled for City Council August 25, 2009. In addition to the items included in the attached staff report, the open items remaining following the Plan Council meeting which will need to be resolved prior to a staff recommendation to approve include: 1. Eliminate the curb inlets proposed at the perimeter of the parking lot areas and providing an opening in the curb and an inlet within the landscape island. 2. Include native seed mix for the stormwater basin area in the southeastern portion of the property(Lot 2/Lot 3). Naturalized seed mix and a 3 year maintenance and monitoring plan are required for this basin. Note for items 1 and 2 above; Section B (ix) of the amended annexation agreement (Ord. 2008-66)states that the, "Owner/Developer has agreed to comply with Best Management Practices in the design, construction, and implementation of a stormwater control facility taking due account of potential chemicals, or petroleunt products being detained, maintaining water quality standards and releasing no pollutants in the 1 Blackberry Creek. " Plan Council has requested the petitioner to increase BMP's related to the stormwater management system as suggested in 1 and 2 above. 3. Revise the northeastern stormwater basin(Lot 3/Lot 4) to not encroach on the proposed cross access easement area providing access to the property adjacent to the east of the Cannonball Trails property. The petitioner explained to Plan Council that they are in discussions with the adjacent property owner and have proposed to construct a shared stormwater basin which would allow for the basin to be reconfigured entirely south of the proposed future access drive. This would be an appropriate solution. In the event the basin cannot be expanded to the east over the adjacent property, the basin would need to be designed deeper in order to accommodate the volume necessary. Staff anticipates one of these scenarios to be designed as part of the August 4, 2009 submittal. 2 07/30/2009 THU 7: 59 FAX 0002/00B 63 Wheeler Road sugar Grove, IL 805114 T6Lc 630 / 466.6704 it FAXi 630 / 486-8701 www.eeiweb.com Eawgla»ring E kwbod rp Wses„ Ino. July 29, 2009 Mr. Joseph A. Wywrot, P,E. City Engineer United City of Yorkville 800 Game f=arm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re; Cannonball Trails Prellminary/Final Engineering United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, li inois Dear Mr. Wywrot: We have reviewed following materials submitted for the above-referenced project- Preliminary/Final Engineering Plans for Cannonball Trails prepared by Koziol Engineering Services consisting of eleven (11) sheets dated July 23, 2009. • Application & Petition for Preliminary Plan and Final Plat Approval dated July 20, 2008. Final Site Plan for Cannonball Trails prepared by Kozial Engineering Services consisting of one sheet dated July 23, 2009. Final Plat of Subdivision of Cannonball Trails Subdivision prepared by Harrington Land Surveying Ltd consisting of two (2) sheets undated. Our review of these plans is to generally determine the plan's compliance with City of Yorkville ordinances and whether the improvements will conform to existing City systems and equipment. This review and our comments do not relieve the designer from his duties to conform to all required codes, regulations, and acceptable standards of engineering practice. Engineering Enterprises, Inc.'s review is not intended as an in-depth quality assurance review. We cannot and do not assume responsibility for design errors or omissions in the plans. Consulting Hngfneere Specialising In Civil Engineering and Land Surveying 07/30/2009 THU 7:59 PAX ID003/908 Mr.Joseph A.Wywrot, P.E. July 29,2009 Page 2 of 7 GENERAL COMMENTS We offer the following comments: 1. Permits or Sign-offs will be required from the following agencies: a. (IDNR) Consultation Agency Action Report regarding endangered/threatened species or natural areas. b. (IHPA) regarding preservation of cultural resources. c. Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District regarding Sanitary Sewer Facilities. d. (IEPA) Division of Water Pollution Control regarding Sanitary Sewer Facilities. e. (IEPA) Division of Public Water Supplies regarding water supply and distribution. f.(IEPA) Division of Water Pollution Control regarding a Notice of Intent (NOI) General permit to discharge storm water. g. Illinois Department of Transportabon ([DOT) regarding the proposed improvements along U.S. Rte 34. Items c, d &e will be required prior to the start of construction activities 2. Sheet C-2 Existing Conditions are not included in the plans submitted for review. 3. An ALTA survey of the existing property should be provided. 4. An Existing Field Tile survey should be provided far review. 5. A Stormwater Management Report should be submitted in its entirety. 6. The plans have provided a continuous northbound right turn lane along the Cannonball Trail frontage and the extension of the southbound right turn lane back to the entrance to Kendall Marketplace. While the separations between the two new access points and between the Kendall Marketplace access and the north most new access point are right at or slightly below the 20D-ft standard set forth in the City's Subdivision Control Ordinance, these separations should allow traffic to function normally on Cannonball Trail and allow for the ingress egress locations as shown. It should be noted, however, F:Jwpv9VRe1PMAnaict,gtw9n%md0c 07/30/2009 THU 8: 00 PAX 160041600 Mr.Joseph A.Wywrot, KE, July 29,2009 Page 3 of 7 that these improvements will necessitate the relocation and reconstruction of a portion of the existing bituminous pathway (not shown) on the west side of Cannonball Trail. An existing traffic signal will also need to be relocated at the northeast corner of U. S. Route 34 and Cannonball Trail. These items should be addressed in the off-site improvement plans for Cannonball Trail and U.S. Route 34. 7. Notes and construction details have only been provided for sanitary sewer (YBSD). Details are needed for all the other areas of construction. These include but are not limited to pavement details, curb and gutter details, curb details, manhole, inlet and catch basin details, frame and lid (grate)details, fire hydrant details, pressure connection details, valve vault details, water service connection details, drop manhole details, retaining wall details, detention basin details and sectional views. General notes should be included that conform to the United City of Yorkville's Subdivision Control Ordinance and Construction standards, SHEET C-3 B. The note and area indicated for the proposed 5 foot dedication is unclear and should be presented to show its entire extent to the north line of lot 4. This may be better shown on Sheet C-2 which is missing in our plan set. 9. The callouts for easements should agree with the easement descriptions in the plat of survey. In this case, they should be "public utility &drainage easement (P.U.&D.E.)" and "Stormwater Management Easement'. Additional comments regarding the easements will be provided under the plat review. 10. The dumpster enclosure on the north side of the automotive building extends into the detention area and appears to have no way to access the dumpsters. The apparent access on the west side would pull the dumpsters onto a side slope. A similar condition exists for the proposed dumpster location north of the bank. While this location is functional, the proximity to the drive through lanes will make access by refuse carriers tight. 11. The Site Data Box appears to have minor mathematical errors in the °Total Impervious Area"—should be 167,722 SF and "Total Previous Area"— should be 78,924 SF. SHEET C-4 12. The 12-inch pressure connection should be provided in lieu of the indicated 16-inch pressure connection on the existing Cannonball Trail water main r:,AvpwrofPrelin6FuialEnglrreering 03.duc 07/30/2009 TAU 8: 0 0 PAX �OD51009 Mr.Joseph A. Wywrot, P.E. July 29, 2009 Page of 13. A fire hydrant should be provided at the end of the proposed 12-inch water main near the southeast corner of the development. 14. The proposed 12-inch dead end water main is capable of meeting fire flow at maximum day demand. However, as designed, this development fails to meet the ordinance requirement of two sources of water. 16. Domestic water services should be tapped off the proposed 6-inch water services outside of the building such that domestic water service boxes are external to the building. 16. Sanitary Manhole No. 3 should be a drop manhole or the proposed north invert will need to be lowered to match the invert of the existing 8-inch sanitary sewer(E-W). The remainder of the sanitary design appears to be appropriate. 17. Existing utility easements should be shown of the plans. The engineer should verify that that east-west run of proposed water main along Rte. 34 is not located in an exclusive sanitary sewer easement. The same section of water main needs to be shown within an easement. 18. Storm sewer design will be reviewed when the stormwater management report and sewer calculations are submitted. SHEETS C-5 AND C-6 19, Grading plans appear to be generally acceptable. However, we respectfully request additional time to complete the detailed review. 20. The proposed retaining wall lacks detail and will require protective railing or fencing. If the retaining wall exceeds three feet in height, the design should be sealed by a structural engineer.. 21. Pavement grading on the east and north sides of the bank is unclear. Additional storm sewer structures may be required. 22. There are many locations in the grading plans with overlapping text Some of the T/C and F callouts in the parking lot north of Buffalo Wild Wings are shifted away from their intended locations due to the redesign of the south full access point. SHEET C-7 23. Erosion control notes should be revised to eliminate references to other municipalities and should reference United City of Yorkville standards. F.VwywrotP,effiW na.Enyineedn9(M.cm 07/30/2009 THU 8: 00 FAX 2006/008 Mr.Joseph A.Wywrot, P.E. July 29,2009 Page 5 of SHEET C,8 24. The Catchment Area sheet should be included in the stormwater management report and is unnecessary in the final engineering plans. SHEET C-9 25, The Fire Protection Plan should add the fire hydrant required at the end of the proposed main in the southeast corner of the development. 28. The bank parcel should be checked for the ability of fire equipment to access the rear of the building without backing out along the retaining wail. The Fire District should review this area specifically in light of the proximity of the retaining wall to the edge of pavement. SHEET C-10 27. The east porfion of the US 34 right-of-way line and some areas of the east lot line do not meet the zero lot line illumination requirements. 28. Pole, luminaire and lamp details are required and manufacturer of each should be Identified. 29. Construction details for should be provided including trench details, foundation details, etc. Cable diagrams should provided showing cable size and type, routing of cable, control location, etc. FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION 30. The existing right-or-way width for both Cannonball Trail and Rte. 34 should be shown. 31. The minimum text size should be 8 pt. currently the some of the tent is bard to read. 32. The current legal description cannot be laid out as it is described and does not close. Measured bearings need to be used to make it a closed legal and the north line of Rte 34 needs to be described better. Currently only the length along the curve is given in the legal. Please check and verify that the measured and record bearing along the east line of the subdivision are correctly labeled. 33. The basis of the bearings used to describe the subdivision boundary should be stated. Fahvyw+ptPrel+u6FinalCig6iee:ui0 03.dcw 07/30/2064 T'HU 0-. 00 PAX 3007/008 Mr.Joseph A.Wywroi, P.E. July 29,2009 Page 6 of? 34. Easement provisions are needed for the cross access easement_ 35. The Utility Easement needs to be changed to Public Utility 8r Drainage Easement. 36. All public utilities need to be in an easement. 37. The Detention easements need to be changed to Stomwrater Management Easements. 38. The easement covering the sanitary sewer at the south line of lot 4 should extend further into the lot to extend ten feet past the sanitary manhole. 39. Angles or bearings are needed for the dimensioning of the detention easements on lots 2, 3 and 4. 40. The existing easement should be dimensioned. 41. The building setback Imes should be shown on all lots. 42. Cross access easements should be provided between all lots, 43. Monument sign easements would probably be a good idea. 44. The pedestrian and bike trail easement provisions should be removed since construction of the same is not anticipated. 45. Unless there is a landscape buffer easement on this plat that has not been shown, the easement provisions for this easement need to be removed. 46. If there is a mortgage on this property then a mortgagee certificate should be provided for the bank to sign. 47. The cross access easement shown on the plat should indicate who access is being granted to. 48. The combined lot dimensions for the west line of lots 2 and 3 do not equal the dimension for the east line of lot 1. SUMMARY Most of the comments above are a result of the incompleteness of the submittal. Conceptually, we do not anticipate any major problems with the design of this commercial development. The design engineer has been responsive to requests for additional information as that information has become available. We F1Wr*-m:PrtlmBFns1En&eernp Oldrw 07/30/2009 THU 0, of PAX �D68l00B Mr, Joseph A.Wywrot, P.E. July 29,2009 Page 7 of 7 recommend that the items indicated herein be resolved and responded to in vernal form and on the plans. We recommend that mass grading permit be withheld until the stormwater report is submitted and reviewed in concert with the grading plan review. We are committed to review these items expeditiously once the additional required infnirmation Is submitted. If you have any comments regarding the above or require any additional information, please feel free to contact our office Sincerely, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. William E. Dunn, P.E. Senior Project Manager pc: Brendan McLaughlin, City Administrator Travis Miller, Director of Community Development Annette Williams,Administrative Assistant JWFIDRM, EEI :'�v� JSC Pr fFd 631k tag fl ip t 3AK �•��° �'''r Memorandum o ZP BST. To: Travis Miller, Community Development Director, Joe Wywrot, City Engineer 0 I-E From: Laura Haake, City Park Designer � �}�� 2d CC: Annette Williams, Administrative Assistant Date: July 29, 2009 Subject: Cannonball Trails Landscape Plan I have reviewed the landscape plan for Cannonball Trails dated July 24, 2009, by Upland Design, Ltd., and have prepared the following comments: General Comments: 1) Show landscape buffer yard dimensions. 2) Show right-of-way dimensions. 3) Label zoning of adjacent parcels. 4) A connection shall be provided for the crossing of Cannonball Trail and Route 34 and any other intersection where a stoplight or stop bars exist for a safe pedestrian crossing. Currently the plan does not show the sidewalk connecting to any intersection. 5) The landscape plan must have a note that states the plan is for Lot 1 and the buffer yard only, lot 2, 3, and 4 shall be submitted for review at a later date. (The landscape plan is not valid for the entire development). b) Best Management Practices shall be included, especially since the site is located in the Blackberry Creek Watershed. None are currently shown on the plan. Landscaping Comments: 7) Street trees are not shown in the proper location. The plan indicates that a gas line is in the parkway along Cannonball Trail and trees cannot be located in this area, however, trees can be located along Route 34 in the parkway. The trees for Cannonball Trail shall be provided on the site. All shade,trees must be placed at least 50' apart, unless located in a parking lot island. 8) Add a note stating that the developer is responsible for replacing trees up to one year after final acceptance. 9) Two shade trees on the northernmost landscape berm are missing labels. 10)Draw connecting lines between plants with of the same species (example 2 Redmond Linden) or label each individually. 11)The northern property line does not have a 3' berm that continues the entire length of the property line. It shall border the parking lot and the detention basin and landscaping shall be located on top of the berm. The parking lot also requires additional landscaping, currently no room is left between the parking lot and the plantings in the 30' buffer yard. Parking Lots: 12)Parking spaces shall be shown on the plan. 13)Parking lot lights shall be shown on the plan. 14)Indicate the parking lot setback. 15)The Karl Forester grass located at all intersections shall be moved to a location where it will not block site visibility. All plants located (other than shade trees)near an intersection or access to parking must be under 2' at mature height. 16) Section 2.l.g. If a stop or yield sign is located at an intersection, no tree, when approaching the intersection, shall be planted closer than 50 lineal feet in front of a sign. Please adjust the trees that are located in front of stop or yield signs on the property. 17)Indicate handicapped parking stalls versus take-out only parking stalls. Stormwater management: 18)Bioswales for parking lot areas to help filter stormwater are preferred. 19)No native seed mix is indicated for the above ground detention. Naturalized seed mix and an 3 year maintenance and monitoring plan are required for all detention or retention basins. 20)It appears there might be fencing behind the Daycare but it is shown partially in the detention area. Please clarify and show the fencing detail. 21)The dumpster enclosure for Lot 2 appears to be on the detention basin berm. 22)Provide a detail for the detention basin retaining walls. C1rf 0 Memorandum 0 ,-� To: Annette Williams, Administrative Assistant(for distribution) �sr -� iaas From: Stephanie Boettcher, Senior Planner P1 CC: �_`�x p Date: July 29, 2009 Vwnlwarry `� Subject: PC2009-12 Cannonball Trails (Preliminary Plan/Final Plat) Staff Suuestions • Section B (ix) of the amended annexation agreement(Ord. 2008-66) states that the, "Owner/Developer has agreed to comply with Best Management Practices in the design, construction, and implementation of a stormwater control facility taking due account of potential chemicals, or petroleum products being detained, maintaining water quality standards and releasing no pollutants in the Blackberry Creek." It is requested the petitioner provide an explanation on how this is met. • The 2000 PUD/Annexation Agreement states under Section 6: Signage, "The CITY agrees to allow for the following signage to be used in the development in conformance with City Ordinances: Two identification signs (one for the commercial area not to exceed 100 square feet and one for the office area not to exceed 100 square feet)." The site plan is complaint with this agreement. 1 f � i .k F� ^ r T tr° _ am. OF �# e M4 +�A jU4�lA4't[f8n lr'k'tiuy + AO t 14 jr, W - ■P - it } r - r' � ��1!Xlhi•,yl , The Date Is provided without warranty or any representation of N PC 2009-12 accuracy,timeliness,or completeness.It is therespow1bi tyoftha "Requester"fo determine accuracy,flmetlness,completeness,and Cannonball Trails Preliminary Plan appropdatertess ofha use.The United City of Yorkville makes no w E war»ndes,expressed or lmpllad,to the use of the Data. -parcel Data a Aerial Photography provided by Kendall County GlS Aerial View -Nap created by United Chy of Yorkville WS S .� y - � •rS u5 ,� � v K - PRELIMINARY/FINAL ENGINEERING Id LOT 4 FOR W ry J rI G ' CANNONBALL TRAILS ! w c ii 4 J R r Y SRyy }C x or +re r<�r.Krnr o.1 t SlTL DATA UN1Ts '3 kn .v 4 Total Fx„t+rg Site Aren $67,811 Sf !e 148 ocj Ila o n,op'-4 90'ealion Arco: 1,165 SF {G: ac', Talal Not We Arta: 266,646 SF (6.121 ac) X. Total imperv,ous Area: 197.772 IG,407i -{E 4 Area: 31,385 SF ::"rtripovemtn! Men 123563} SF tr;p R [ ''°t.� �� Cancrele ttax;/Palo: A.581 SF rnp y4 Dllenla Aram 28,143 SF Total Forviatlf Arta: 78,874 SF 29.60X LOT 3 l -3-1 Z N'NG RE�:JI'?I_hriL l `5 ,A3DvE L4CuHp LOT AREA 10.GCasf DETEt no" FROW YARD (min) A/4 1 i•e� sr raw ft-w- 1-4 •a SIDE YARD to s+de lot rno 2C 'A� sr i. R +:�^ $'DE YARD to slrerl _ 30' f •�� REAR YARD AT _ +• � ` TRANSITIpNAt YARQ to rrrlitlenl,d 3D- py� r xe, r+s 1 ARM �0 1 LOT ARf.fS BUILDING AREAS. _ RE'OUIRED PARKING PROPDSED PARKING t Ak s+Idr mA I I I r i S.000 st RETAIL 40 SPACES 49 SPACES (75j' : T, 6] r I LOT t 2 582 sc 1 j a t 5,785 if RESTAURANT 8p SPACES irC:'CCG'. 110 SPACES 14.7'/1.r] G) s, + SLOT 2 _0.963 nc 3.000 S( BANK 9 9 SPACES (3 3/1070; IS SPACES (5 Cfr.a6 ; ` 'LOT t 057 ac E,ECO eT AWDVOT04 TBD SPACTS 15 SPACES (2 271'.020; h - - - ,�, , LOT ! LOT 2 S r ! t y+g g,DOO %f bAYCARE 35 SPACES _'q ti 36 SPACES t S u8/= ',DrAL FnTAI — 145 SPACES TOTAL- 225 SPACES i� - tac.a •��'•nr+r + 35 GO 'er awa r skies F ��rwri + -%130 c r wr prv.re`in u '- Q�1mR YM1 vY�A W CMt � I�LIIAItt ■rlti owtl/�larlaxal�raltrt♦Il1YrT• M� `,1%sfl CITY Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� O -n Legal ❑ Finance ❑ J EST. isss Engineer ❑ -4 v3 City Administrator F-1 Tracking Number O 1 'Fi Consultant ❑ r�11�-r�,nn Cl CbC oCnq - I Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Prestwick Request for Payment Plan and Fee Lock Extension Meeting and Date: EDC / Aug. 4, 2009 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Travis Miller Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum EST -� 'ti T°: EDc 1036 From: Travis Miller CC: Lisa Pickering (for distribution) p Im. i-V� w �. p Date: July 28, 2009 Subject: Prestwick of Yorkville--Request for Fee Lock Extension J4 k Petitioner Reauest/Backaround Attachcd is a letter from Attorney James Olguin, representing Yorkville Farms Development. LLC, (Prestwick of Yorkville) requesting the following: - an extension of 2 years to pay a lump sum amount of 552,000 due to the Bristol Kendall Fire Department Development Fee. - an extension of 2 years to pay a lump sum amount of$26,000 due for the Library Development Fee. - An extension of 4 years be applied to the fee lock which is due to expire November 15, 2009. Yorkville Farms Development, LLC was notified on May 15, 2009 of the unpaid fees as well as the fee lock expiration. Please refer to the attached Expiration of Fee Structure notification describing the outstanding fees due as well as the lock expiration. The Plan Review fees of$3,750.39 were paid following the May 15, 2009 notice. Following the direction of the EDC July 7, 2009, the Fire Department and Library- Board have each reviewed the request and have recommended allowing the delayed payments as well as the fee lock extension as requested. Attached are letters from each. The terms requested to be amended are terms of the Annexation Agreement. In order to amend these terms a public hearing would need to be scheduled before the City Council. Bristol Kendall Fire Department 103 1lam Beaver.Street Yorkville, IL 60560-1704 Phone: 630 553-6186 Fax: 630 553-1482 July 16,2009 Mr. Travis Miller Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Dear Mr. Miller: At your request the Bristol Kendall Fire Protection District has reviewed the requests of Yorkville Farms Development, LLC,the developer of Prestwick of Yorkville, to(1)grant an extension of the of the lump sum payment for a period of two years, and (2)that the fee lock be extended for an additional four years. It is with some reluctance that the Fire Protection District giants the developer of Prestwick these time extensions. Sincerely, .rte Tom Lindblom Deputy Fire Chief To: Travis Miller, Community Development Director From: Yorkville Public Library Board of Trustees-Gail Gaebler, secretary Date: July 16, 2009 Subject: Prestwick of Yorkville - Request for Payment Delay and Fee Lock Extension Dear Mr. Miller, The Yorkville Public Library Board of Trustees reluctantly agrees to the request by Prestwick of Yorkville for a 2 year extension to pay the amount of$26,000 currently due for the Library Development Fee and to the request for an extension of 4 years applied to the fee lock. Sincerely, Gail Gaebler, secretary Goldstine, 5krodzki, Russian, Nemec and Hoff, Ltd. Anorney!at Law %Mi111am A1.emm n leyWkV LcUudke Rlc ard) Skrndzid x6s:lnaE.Buchenaurr T,Wran Sara L Spwrr The Praltie Building Paul R.Bulkema Wnlel l-McCAr1hy 01 Gwendc YR] Srerk' 935 McClintock D rive.■Second Floor Greapry y cedslarrUno Kenneth 1 rr .k. Jcx thx++'slrl;rr•gon•L Dose'I Rkisud 1 Weltel Burr Ridge,IL 60527-0860 Brian V oft trty ChribIrHd e�1,%o,•-1, ErkJL Wien-'* Telephone(630)655-6000 Rwrat D.— a kma t Oiguin Facsimile (b3❑)655-98M Junta D.Healy Diana K.pawn •AbAdmnlad W,Ind6n1 Howod M.I-terf Donald S.RorhwhW •-A6a Adnugai 1n Cd,tarxn www.gsmh.corn William M Hraliak.k Thorrtai P.AuWan —AM Admiild In Murat A June 11, 2009 Travia Miller, Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, XL 60560 RE: Expiration of Fee Structure for Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision Dear Mr. Miller: Please be advised that the undersigned represents Yorkville Farma Development, LLC, the Developer of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision. We are in receipt of your letter dated Max 15, 2009 regarding the fees due to the United City of Yorkville and the expiration of the ,fee lock associated with the subdivision. In response, we ask that the City to consider the following: 1. 21an Review Pees in the amount of _53.750.39. These fees were paid shortly after receipt of your letter; 2. Bristol Kendall Fire Department Development Fee and Yorkville Public Librazv Development Pee. The Developer requests that they be granted an extension of the lump sum payment obligation for a period of two (2) years from the date of this letter, The real estate market has been decimated. The lack of sales and income makes the payment of these fees at this time impossible, Although the payments cannot be made at this time, both the Fire Department and Library District are fully protected. As you know, payment of the fees are required prior to the issuance of building permits. This is the traditional mechanism used by municipalities in the region as the impact on the districto does not occur until the homes are built and occupied. Consequently, the extension will not increase the risk faced by the Fine Department and Library District; and N.r. Travis Miller June 11, 2009 Page Two 3. ftniration of Eee Structure Lock. The Developer also respectfully requests that the fee lock be extended for an additional four (4) years. Due to the collapse of the real estate market, the Developer has had to cut costs and pricing dramatically. Even with drastic cuts, sales have been non-existent. An increase in the fees and costs at this time would exacerbate the problem and reduce the marketability of the lots in the subdivision even further. Under these conditions, we believe that the City should consider the oppasite approach and look into the possibility of reducing fees it the short term in order to stimulate the market. As T am sure you recall, the neveloper was always willing to work with the village in the past. We hope that these past efforts and cooperation will be remembered. unfortunately, we are faced with an unprecedented tirre in the real estate market and the City's. cooperation is crucial in order to make this a viable development. Thank you for your consideration and assistance in t:qis matter. very truly yours, t7amer R. Ol,sin JEOJj ak +tsus.t United City of Yorkville County Seat of Kendall County ors.„� 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 ° Telephone: 630.553-4350 h�L�^luv May 15,2009 Yorkville Farms Development, LLC 16501 South Parker Road Homer Glen,IL 60491 Matt Klabisch CK.Construction 11348 Ccdwwood Court Frankfort, IL 60423 Re: Expiration of Fee Structure for Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision Dca`Matl, This is notification of outstanding payment due as well as notification of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision fee look expiration. Current outstanding fees due to the United City of Yorkville include: • Ptaa Review Fees of$3,750.39 • BristoI Kendall Fire Department Development Fee(lamp seam)o!552,000 o (Please Note:this number Mresents half of the amount of the development fee, equal to 5500,for the 109 units recording at the first final plat minus 92,000 recaived) • Yorkvitle Public library Development Fez(lump sum) ofSA000 o (Please Note, this number represents half of the amount of the development fee, equal to $250,for the l08 units recording at the first final plot,which is equal to $27,000. The Developer hat paid the full fee amount of S500 at building permit of the four existing units. Therefore,a credit of S 1000 has been applied to the lump sum amount due,bringing the total Library fee due to S26,000). Plesac pay the above amouats(totaling S03,7$0.39) immediately. Pcr Sedioo I l oftlre Annexation Agreement between the United City of Yorkville and Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision dated April,26 2005,the fee structure established for Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision was Uld at 2005 rates for a period of 4 years. Upon expiration of this 4 year term, the United City of Yorkville is to nodfj the Owner and/or Developer of the property of the expiration. A grace period of 6 months is given from the dale of notification until current fees can be assessed, This as your notification of said fee s(ructure expiration. The current fee structure will be assessed to the Prestwick of Yorkville development b months from this notification,November 15,2009. Attached is the updated fat structure for the Prestwick ofYorkviile Subdivision, Please note the updated fee structure may change on or altar the November 15,2009 expiration date,as this is only a representation ofthe current 2009 Fees assessed by the United City ofYorkyi)1c, Sincerely, Travis Miller,Dtrector Cornmunisy Development Department Attachments—Prestwick ofYor$Mlle Fee Structure per Current United City of Yorkviliz Fees May 15,2004 Bristol•Kondall Fire Department L&tter Cc; Brendan McLaughlin.City Administrator Kethleen Field Orr, City Attorney William Deltmer,Cade Official Prestwick of Yorkville FEES PER UNIT A pod rer*ptfrom 09 SO" t:e,502-A Centel Parkway varkr0la,must be prtasanled In the City prior bo Qauamne d penral x.7.000 Stp9rate Yorkv1941-16slol Sanitary Distract rae-made payable to Y.8S,D. $1,400 Urtited City grYork►rljltfeea 1, Bu1dIng Permit Cost I bM plus$0.20 per sq,aart faal 460+$0,29(SF) 2. Water Connecoan Foes 5F and DU $3.700 2*Bed All N f A 3. W&W~cut DWAdwd Urits $300 Atlathed Ur11ts NIA 4. City saner Connection Frees riuox 3. Water and Srvmw Inspection Fee. $25 9. Pub4c WalksOlvo ay Tnipawinrl Fm 33S 7. Developmert Few Publla Wake s700 Police $300 A1tr11dpa1 BuPdtng Lets 1-106(see nale b brlow} Lots 102.356(sob note c bek w) t brwy LOW 1-104(see We d below) 67&0 Labs 109-MO 46oa Pants a Kerreaaon $50 Engin smrklg $100 Bdsta-KwWd Fire Lots 1-SCE(see we a bdo*) $500 Lots log-354 .pQQ D srre lopment Fees TPlelt Lots 1.108 Y1,g00 Late tog.356 $2,GM V rwtc B.Land Casts Few -a-MW Apeutrnenl Twat: m Dupltlt 31agla FwWlE Park NIA M)A N 1 A 51,961.110 stahaat WA HLd W.A 34,780.41 Lwnd-Cah Fees Twat $0.40 $0,00 $0.00 $6,432.17 P. Rood ContrUWn i7.M Note:PUD agreement apaed'aaa ftl theee fees are to be dF9eounled a. For upkanl loralvah damiam 6pana,pbaaa rater to SLOW-COan'Wafth"'.a assd on aye tuff b.l]tveiap,crlr►propad[ka G Fea to be aaaaaaed d feel ria:rncn arrp. Fee nrmum b haaad on lha ar.M.1 U1 lain aged at?To] olel awaval,Tm 2409 Rwroca t b[ddine'va b MWI9er LWA Oeyticoneri wdC ba,aab)ad b tnvol"tto No let a.thvIp"topryljmpw mo1MWOtar$rat4rwlpttl(ursti1-1x8). RemNdarh11R11750peaudq 1n he Feld a lsuikfinq peat FLA let ixommad fur vri.13 1eW1e e. 5051 d BKFO n Luba pad at teat lmal plat{urW 1-509)arswunt o!1164M, ltwoorider prd a: barAvV paredt, M rat assrared1m unba iae•asa . Aaraa baglrta Newnbar 7.20M Bristol Kend ell1 Fire Department D 103 l-aii Beaver Strett Yorkville,Il.60560.1704 Phone:630 553.6186 Fax:630 553-1482 May 15,2004 Mr.Travis Miller Comutunity Development Dimstor United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm hoed Yorkville,IL 60560 Dear Mr.Miller: It is my understanding that when Prestwick of Yorkville agreed to the annexation agreement with the City of Yorkville there was tanguage in the agrecment as follows: "The DEVELOPER shall pay a Fitt District fen of Onc Thousand Dollars(S1,000.00) per home. One half of said fet(5500.00 per unit) shall be due and payabie forthc first phase ofthe development:in a lump sum at the time of final plat recording. The balance for additional phases,if any,shall be paid si the building permit stage" it is my further undnraianding that phase one contained 108 units,thus payment to the fire district should have been S54,000,00.Our records show that we have only received S2,00.00(4 permits @ S500.00 each). Any help thaiyou or your office can give to help remedy this situation would be appreciated by this Department Sincerely, Toth Lindblom Deputy Fire Chief