The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet 2013 03-12-13 CI r� ,$ United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST. r7� - 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 o l�, Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Kengail Gaury h<C E X1'�r AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 12, 2013 Call to Order: Pledge of Allegiance: Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV Carlo Colosimo Jackie Milschewski Marty Munns Rose Ann Spears Ken Koch Larry Kot Chris Funkhouser Diane Teeling Establishment of Quorum: Amendments to Agenda: Presentations: Public Hearings: 1. PC 2013-03 Veterans Way, LLC, Petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting a major amendment the Second Amendment to the Heartland Subdivision Annexation and Planned Unit Development dated January 11, 2005 related to the Heartland Business Center to permit the placement of an additional ten foot by sixteen foot (10'x16') sign with eleven(11)tenant sign panels within a driveway median of the subject property. The real property consists of approximately 5.1 acres of the common area located generally south of U.S. Route 34; west of McHugh Road; and north of Heartland Drive at 728 E. Veterans Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois. 2. Proposed FY 2013-2014 Budget Citizen Comments on Agenda Items: Consent Agenda: Minutes for Approval: 1. CC 2013-14 Minutes of the City Council—February 12, 2013 2. CC 2013-15 Minutes of the City Council—February 26, 2013 Bills for Payment(Informational): $583,379.96 Mayor's Report: 1. PC 2013-02 Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of the Second Amendment to the Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement with JAC Kendall Holdings,LLC (Briarwood—Cornerstone Subdivision) 2. CC 2013-16 B.U.I.L.D. Incentive Program 2 nd Extension Request City Council Agenda March 12, 2013 Page 2 Public Works Committee Report: 1. PW 2012-74 Ordinance Approving the Amendment to the Amended Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement between the United City of Yorkville and the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District regarding Billing for District Services Economic Development Committee Report: Public Safety Committee Report: Administration Committee Report: Park Board: 1. CC 2013-17 Riverfront Businesses Contract Extensions a. Resolution Approving a Lease Extension Agreement with Erick Goepel Doing Business As River City Roasters (131 East Hydraulic Avenue,Unit C) b. Resolution Approving a Lease Extension Agreement with Robyn Sutcliff Doing Business As Whitewater Ice Cream(131 East Hydraulic Avenue,Units A& B) c. Resolution Approving a Lease Extension Agreement with Specialty Expeditions, Inc. Doing Business as Geneva Kayak Center(301 E. Hydraulic Avenue) Plan Commission: 1. PC 2012-11 Ordinance Approving the Kendall Crossing PUD Final Plat Zoning Board of Appeals: City Council Report: City Clerk's Report: City Treasurer's Report: Community and Liaison Report: Staff Report: Mayor's Report (cont'd): 3. CC 2013-12 Proposed FY 2013-2014 Budget Additional Business: Executive Session: Citizen Comments: Adjournment: City Council March 12, 2013 Page 3 COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND[0ESl»ONS00lLJTlES - - - -ADMINISTRATION: Hall Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alden-nao8pcara Finance Library Committee: /\|dezmonMuooa Administration Committee: AldcooauFmud«bouaer Committee: Alderman Koch ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------'----'----- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: A]dermuuMonno Community Development Plan Commission Vice-Chairman: AldermaoTeeliug Building Safety and Zoning Yorkville Econ. Dcv. Corp. Committee: AJdernzaoM8ochcvvski Kendall Co. Plan Commission Couuod1re: Alderman Colosimo -'----'--'--'--------------------'-----'--'---'-----------'---------'-----'--------Council Committee Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Colosimo Police Human Resource Comm. Vice-Chairman: AldermooKnt School District Committee: Alderman Spears Cnzoozdtce: AJderozmnFnndkhnuaer _-_-'---'--'--_-_-'---------------_--_-_-__---------- ------_-'-__---_-_--_-_-_--_--'- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Teeling Public Works Park Board Vice-Chairman: /\}dernzanMileobevvobj Engineering YB8D Committee: Alderozao}Cwt f,nzkm and Recreation Committee: Alderman Koch UNITEDCITYcf)FgYORKVILLEq WORKSHEETq CITYcPOUNCILq Tuesday, March 12, 2013 7:00cpMq CITYcr-OUNCILcf-HAMBERSq ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q q q q q q q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q Public Hearings: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q 1. PCcp-013-03c�econdgkmendmentgoqhecfl eartlandc�ubdivisiongknnexationgtndcrUDgelatedqoqheq Heartlandcl3usinesscr-enter4Signage)q q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q 2. ProposedgFY(g013-2014cj3udgetq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q 1. CCcg 013-14c�4inutescpfgheCitycf—'ouncilc-cf ebruarygl2,c�013q ❑ Approved:cyq qN cffjpc�ubjectgoq q ❑ Removedq q ❑ Notesq q q q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q 2. CCcp-013-15c�4inutescpfghecC—itycrouncilg4ebruary c�6,c�013q ❑ Approved:clVq qN cpc�ubjectgoq q ❑ Removedq q ❑ Notesq q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q BILLS FOR PAYMENT: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q 1. Billscforcrayment4lnformational)clI ❑ Notesq q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q MAYOR'S REPORT: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q 1. PCcg013-02cprdinanceclkuthorizingghecr-xecution cpfghecf econdgkmendmentgoqheqknnexationcpnd cPUDcf qgffggpggWgAgreementgwith4AC cfCendallcfIoldings,4 LC4Briarwoodc-(f ornerstonec�ubdivision) ❑ Approved:clVq qN (Wcfubject4oq q ❑ Removedq q ❑ Bringcpack4ocf ommittee/futuregneetinggg q ❑ Informational4temq q ❑ Notesq q q q q q q ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CCg2013-16cp.U.I.L.D.4ncentivecprogramc� dcf-xtensioncrequestq ❑ Approved:clVq qN gEpc�ubjectgoq q ❑ Removedq q ❑ Notesq q q q q q q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q 1. PWc2 012-74cprdinancegkpprovingghecl kmendmentgogheqkmended4ntergovernmentalcC-ooperativecg lillilgilillll AgreementcpetweenghecC-ityq#ndgYBSDgegardingcf3illingcforcpistrictc�ervicesq ❑ Approved:clVq qN gWc�ubjectgoq q ❑ Removedq q ❑ BringcpackgoCommittee/futuregneetingap q ❑ Informational4temq q ❑ Notesq q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q PARK BOARD: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q 1. CCcp-013-174iverfrontcpusinessescC-ontract cfxtensionsq a. gesolutiongkpprovingqicf easecr-xtensiongvithcf-rickcfioepelglbacpiverLf ity4Zoastersgg ❑ Approved:clVq qN gWc�ubjectgoq q ❑ Removedq q ❑ Bringcpackgocr-ommittee/futuregneetingga q ❑ Notesq q q q b. Resolutiongkpprovinggicf easecr-xtensiongvithcpobyn(f;utcliffgdbaq"itewater4ce(freamcf ❑ Approved:cyq qN gfgpc�ubjectgoq q ❑ Removedq q ❑ Bringcpackgocf-ommittee/futuregneetinggl q ❑ Notesq q q q c. Resolutiongkpprovingcpcf easecf-xtensiongvithc fpecialtycr-xpeditionsglbacfienevacfCayakcR ❑ Approved:cyq qN cWcfubjectgoq q ❑ Removedq q ❑ Bringcpackgocf-ommittee/futuregneetinggl q ❑ Notesq q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q PLAN COMMISSION: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q 1. PCg2 012-1 l cprdinanceclkpprovingghecrendall cf rossingcpUDcf inalcplatcg ❑ Approved:clVq qN qjgpc�ubjectgoq q ❑ Removedq q ❑ Bringcpackgocf ommittee/futuregneetingga q ❑ Informationalgtemq q ❑ Notesq q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q MAYOR'S REPORT (cont'd): -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q 3. CCq?013-12cFiscalgYearcP-014cl3udgetq ❑ Notesq q q q q q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q REPORTS: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q q q q q q q q q q q q q -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q CITIZEN COMMENTS: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------q q q q q q q A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 040 Legal ❑ Public Hearing#1 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development PC 2013-03 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Heartland Center Subdivision PUD Amendment Meeting and Date: City Council/March 12, 2013 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 1/11/2005 Action Taken: Amendment to PUD Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: •��`° crr� Memorandum J� 0 a "% To: City Council EST. 1836 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director -�� CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator o �� Date: March 5, 2013 �dgC. •� Subject: PC 2013-03 Heartland Center Subdivision PUD Amendment <LE 728 E. Veterans Parkway Proposed Additional Monument Signage CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: The City has received an application from Veterans Way, LLC seeking an amendment to the Heartland Center Subdivision Planned Unit Development (PUD) to install an additional monument sign with tenant panels within the existing driveway median of the Heartland Center commercial retail property located off of E. Veterans Parkway(US Route 34). BACKGROUND &REQUEST: The applicant, Veterans Way, LLC (James Ratos), has recently taken ownership of Lot 7 within the Heartland Center commercial retail property and currently rents up to ten (10) tenant spaces including Mike & Denise Pizza, Fox Valley Uniforms, Thompson Chiropractors, Modern Dentistry, Pesola Media, Heartland Blood Center, Atlas Physical Therapy and Karate Extreme. The approximately 0.883-acre parcel, which has a strip center and various outlots, is zoned B-3 Service Business District and approved as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) in 2005 via Ordinance 2005-05 (see attached). The original Annexation and PUD Agreement for the development did not address specific signage criteria. Currently, the development has one (1) monument tenant sign for the entire retail center which is located on the lot of the newly constructed Dairy Queen restaurant. Per an executed Mutual and Reciprocal Sign Easement in 2012 between the owners of Dairy Queen, Chicago Title and Trust #3191, and the applicant (see attached), only 25% or the lower left half of the existing monument sign would be reserved for use by tenants of Lot 7. Therefore, the applicant is seeking to amend the Heartland Center Subdivision PUD agreement to permit the installation of an additional monument tenant sign off of Veterans Parkway within Lot 7 of the commercial retail development. According to the applicant, the additional sign is needed to provide adequate business identification and visibility for all of his tenants, as the retail strip where he is located is not immediately adjacent to the roadway. PROPOSED SIGNAGE: The proposed monopole-type sign would be located on private property within the driveway median of the entrance to Lot 7 off of Veterans Parkway (US Route 34) and perpendicular to the roadway, as illustrated on the attached sign plan. The sign also appears to be located within an existing ten foot(10')wide City public utility easement, as depicted on the Heartland Center Final Plat of Subdivision. The double-faced internally-illuminated sign is proposed to be twenty-four feet(24'-0")tall, clad in brick to complement the existing monument sign and building's fagade, and will be capped with stone. The sign area will consist of up to eleven (11) tenant panels and have a width of 10 feet and length of 16 feet for an overall area total 160 square feet. The sign face will be fabricated out of white acrylic with the copy applied to the surface , similar to that of the existing Heartland Center development sign. STAFF ANALYSIS: Although the proposed new sign does not conform to the Sign Ordinance criteria with regards to size, height or location, the intent of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to provide flexibility from the rigidity of the conventional zoning/bulk/signage regulations if there is a greater benefit to the property and the City as a whole. The applicant believes there is a greater benefit to not only his tenants,but the Heartland Center overall, to be permitted the additional sign as it will free up panel slots for the other businesses in the development not owned by the applicant to be advertised on the existing monument sign. The following table compares the proposed new sign and the existing sign with the current sign ordinance regulations: • Max. 32 square feet for lots less than three(3)acres 98.61 square feet 160 square feet • Max. 64 square feet for lots (11'-10"x 8'-4") (16'x 10') three(3)or more acres. Max. 8 feet or lessl 18 feet 8 inches Twenty-four(24)feet - ' 1 • Located at least 5' from any • Located within the • Located within a driveway and lot line. front yard approx. driveway island within a • Signs taller than thirty eleven feet(11')from public utility easement. inches(30")shall not be the lot line and more • Undetermined the located within that part of than five(5)feet from distance setback from the the yard or open area of a a driveway or drive northern property line. corner lot included within a aisle. • Not located within a line- triangular area twenty-five • Not located within a of-sight. feet(25')from the point of line-of-sight. intersection of two street right of way lines forming a corner(line-of-sight). Finally, the estimated distance between the existing monument sign and the proposed new sign is approximately seventy-five feet (75'). While the Sign Ordinance does not have a direct minimum distance requirement between permanent ground signs, in Section 8-11-9A, a minimum distance is implied; since lots three (3) acres or greater with street frontages in excess of 800' and entrances/exits at least 600' apart permitted to have a sign on each street frontage. STAFF COMMENTS: One item of importance to note, Staff was just made aware that although the applicant is the owner of a significant portion of the Heartland Center property, and particularly the lot where the proposed new sign will be installed; he is not the sole owner of the entire development. Therefore, authorization from the other two (2) property owners is needed on this request to move forward with an approval. Staff understands from the applicant's attorney,that full owner authorization is pending. Should the City Council concur that this request is beneficial for the overall development, suitable for the site and an appropriate amendment to the Heartland Center PUD, an ordinance will be drafted for the March 26th meeting for consideration. The applicant and his attorney will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to address the City Council and those present for the public hearing regarding this matter. ' Section 8-11-6-B defines Sign Height as computed as the distance from the grade of the centerline of the adjacent street to the top of the highest attached component of the sign. LAW OFFICES OF Daniel J. Kramer DANIEL J.KRAMER 1 107A SOUTH BRIDGE STREET KELLY A.HELLAND YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS 60560 D.J.KRAMER (630)553-9500 Fax: (630) 553-5764 �n V JAN 24 2U13 January 23, 2013 CUMMU1111y DEVE.UPMENT DEPARTMENT Krysti Barksdale-Noble United City of Yorkville Via Hand Delivery Re: Heartland Business Center PUT) Amendment Application for Sign Dear Ms. Barksdale-Noble: Enclosed please find the following documents for the Kendall Crossing Preliminary and Final Plat Applications: 1. 1 original PUT)Amendment Application and 40 copies 2. 1 check in the amount of$500.00 for Filing Fee 3. 1 check in the amount of$1,000.00 for engineering deposit 4. 1 disc with application Should you have any questions please let me know. Very trul ours, Daniel J. Kramer Attorney at Law DJK1cth Enclosures § ^ � § D w - § - e \ � � \ 6 � a - 46 Z er 9L § \ ` - _ k ° � � ) ) ) } @ \ - � � � & & � 2 _ \ \ Q \ \ \ f \ _§ { | f@ « ) ® q # \ $ 0 , \ \ \ { \ 2 )2 0 \ « $ - ; i ; : - © � � w * / } \ off ! ! ) / / } ; \ ; « � ! 16 I 4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners entitled to notice of petition j under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: (Please attach a separate list as Exhibit "B".) 5. Date of Annexation or PUD Agreement sought to be amended: Name of Agreement: Second Amendment to Heartland Subdivision Annexation & PUD Date of Recording: 2/4/2005 Attach a true and correct copy of agreement as Exhibit "C'. 6. State the items to be amended from the existing annexation or PUD agreement. Amendment to permitted signage to allow Petitioner to place 10 ' by 16 ' sign with 11 tenant name locations in driveway median of subject property adjacent to Route 34 in the United City of Yorkville as Der the attached drawing Exhibit "D" 7. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: Daniel J . Kramer Attorney: Name: Daniel J. Kramer Address: 1107A S . Bridge Street , Yorkville IL 60560 Phone Number: 630-553-9500 Fax Number: 630-553-5764 Email Address: dame'@dankramerlaw. corn Engineer: Name: N/A Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: Land Planner: Name: N/A Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: li Page 16 of 5 United City of Yorkville Amend Annexation/PUD Application Revised: 9. 14.09 i 17 9. Submit the following to the Community Development Department in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies. b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to page 4 of this application 'Petitioner Route, Step 1, Fees and/or contact the Community Development Department for verification of this amount). c. Site Plan (if necessary): 40 sets folded to fit in a 10"x 13" envelope d. One CD containing PDFs of the signed application, exhibits and site plans, The legal description and amendment(draft)documents should be in word.doc format. In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is contiguous to the United City of Yorkville. Date: - trvvvwn 23jz_1_?L_ Petitioner(s)Signature: (All legal property owners of record signatures must appear on this application.) Vet s Wa , By: Jards G. Ratos, Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of=, 203 Notary Seal THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. P MM EAL"MER OF ILLINOIS RES 412/2018 Page 17 of S United City of Yorkville Amend Annexation/PUD Application Revised: 9.14.09 18 AMENDMENTTO ANNEXATION OR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT PETITIONER ROUTE Step 1 : Petitioner must submit a completed application, fees' and all pertinent materials to the Community Development Department a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. Petitioner is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U. S, Army Corps of Engineers, etc. , to allow timely review by City. 'Fees: 1 . a. Annexation/PUD Amendment - $500 b Deposit for outside consultants - under 2 acres = $1 ,000 2 to 10 acres = $2,500 over 10 acres = $53000 Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). Should Owner/Developer not pay these fees directly; they will be responsible for reimbursing the United City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs. Note: You must present your plan at each of the meetings below as indicated. Step 2: Plan Commission : The Plan Commission meets the 2nd Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. at the Yorkville Public Library, 902 Game Farm Road. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Amendment to Annexation/PUD Agreement. For a public hearing, the petitioner shall complete and submit to the Community Development Department the application with a legal description 45 days prior to the public hearing at the Plan Commission meeting. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record at least 15 days but no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing date. Before this amendment can move forward to the Economic Development Committee, a "draft" Amendment to the Annexation or PUD Agreement must be written. Step 3: Economic Development Committee: The Economic Development Committee meets the first Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Economic Development meeting where no formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings and for review of the draft amended agreement. Step 4: City Council: Meetings are held the 2ntl and 4th Tuesdays of each month at 7 p. m, in the Council Chambers at City Hall. i A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Amendment to Annexation/PUD Agreement. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record at least 15 days but no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing date. A certified affidavit must be filed by the petitioner with the Community Development Department's office containing the names, addresses and permanent parcel numbers of all parties that were notified. Page 18 of 5 United City of Yorkville Amend Annexation/PUD Application Revised: 9. 14.09 i 19 Agreement: 1 understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred administrative and planning consultant fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return this original (retaining a copy for your records) to the Community Development Department, United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road , Yorkville, Illinois 60560. Signature of Petitioner �� t "° Date: j 1113 1-) i I Page 19 of 5 United City of Yorkville Amend Annexation/PUD Application Revised: 9.14.09 PARCEL 1 : LOT 7 AND AN UNDIVIDED 37 . 60 % INTEREST IN LOT 8 IN HEARTLAND CENTER RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 IN HEARTLAND CENTER SUBDIVISION UNIT 11 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED APRIL 8 , 2005 AS DOCUMENT 200500009772 , IN THE UNITED CITY OF OF YORKVILLE , KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS . PARCEL 2 : EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 , AS CREATED BY DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR HEARTLAND CENTER OWNERS ASSOCIATION FROM HOBSON HOLLOW , INC . AND CASTLE BANK AS TRUSTEE NOVEMBER 12 , 2003 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 2180 DATED APRIL 20 , 2005 AND RECORDED APRIL 21 , 2005 AS DOCUMENT 200500011270 , FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER , ACROSS AND THROUGH THE ACCESS ROAD DESIGNATED ON EXHIBITS B AND C , AND ALL PAVED AREAS IN THE DEVELOPMENT TRACT , EXCEPT (A) THOSE PAVED AREAS DESIGNATED FOR PARKING SPACES AND DRIVE THROUGH SERVICE LANES ON THE SITE PLANS ON FILE WITH THE BOARD AND ( B) EXCEPT AREAS MARKED OR DESIGNATED FOR PARKING ON LOT 8 . I, I I, PARCEL 3 : EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 , AS CREATED BY DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR HEARTLAND CENTER OWNERS ASSOCIATION FROM HOBSON HOLLOW , INC . AND CASTLE BANK AS TRUSTEE NOVEMBER 12 , 2003 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 2180 DATED APRIL 20 , 2005 AND RECORDED APRIL 21 , 2005 AS DOCUMENT 200500011270 , FOR CUSTOMER PARKING OVER , ACROSS , AND ON THE PAVED AREAS DESIGNATED AS PARKING AREAS EXCEPT AREAS MARKED OR DESIGNATED FOR PARKING ON LOT 8 . I II Exhibit "A" i i I I i p Aumm sign CO.,Inc 2012 IGN CO `! 1 nSR4 I,i ANSLn+NO¢1 <- zi Heartland Center .KEw,Y.4 ® DOUBLE-FACED ILLUMINATED SIGN FABRICATE AND INSTALL SIGN OF ALUMINUM AND STEEL ANGLE. 24 ' 0 " FACE5 TO BE WHITE ACRYLIC WITH COPY APPLIED FIR5T 5URFACE. " ® EXP05ED METAL 5URFACE5 TO 5E COATED WITH ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE. INTERNAL ILLUMINATION TO 3E HIGH OUTPUT FLUORESCENT LAMPS. [IJ SCALE - 1142' = 1' tY W rt d ®® xnmmune ann< ��, , 51>F I .`"` as"'y e a""§" ri—N . . t 5ETJ10"X 21 STTEEL PTH CONCRETE FOOTING TO" STAGE 8" X 71' STEEL PIPE ON TOP. 51GN TO 5E PERPENDICULAR.TO Ii CONNECT TO ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED 5Y OTHERS PRIOR TO IN5TALL. MA50NKY DY OTHERS. 1100 Route 34 Prepared For: HEARTLAND CENTER Adi FT 34 0Mv 212571 eae 3 D<�s<B<a: 12/19/12 x<a: xP,6: Aurora, Illinois 60504 630 898 5900 office Loction Nai City/sham 630 898 6091 fa I YORKVILLE, IL x<.z xr s: are: NOTE THIN DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF AURORA SIGN CO. IT IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, COPIEO. OREXHIBITED IN ANY FASHION WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT FROM AURORA SIGN CO. CHARGES OF UP TO$2000.00 WILL BE ASSESSED FOR ANY MIS-USE OF THESE DRAWINGS. FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION OF , NS ALLOWS ONAMEND COSS ONCE NO HEARTLAND CENTER SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 ° °0N"w6 W D 6 OR x. vworts GGAreTE INaucx,s .- opt ONES 1_ _ PAC PODLK S,a1 PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTOR 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH RANGE LONG OE usEUExrs p.0 6 otJ g J, EAST OF ME THIRD PRINCIPAL MEA DIAN, IN ORISTP_ TOWNSHIP, W ' 1} Art N MORES) ExEt I_J Nncn,E w '6.y7$ EPERYME OFNCnlE4 O KENDALL CWNTY, ILLINOIS a ^ \ Y lnaa- t m PIGS TO HIGHWAY E VAT OF BEAR i i Or NNFD [x LO°CA=10 ha[PRAl R CACEM. / �. r NET AREA OF L015 1,2 AND 3^ 10.492 PICTURES \ \ WHO 705 CUBA ccCU TO w:° SLnS"m'E6n a P°EPCCaaom UPS. Ga. FOR E PIT ypP1Gx x, °c \]` ° m , AIM LOT x N0 LOT x TO A Mok o zE �\ 1 0 . Ej Bier \ix�., L0r E ��T "Nm�OF AR GO PHASE W, �Fi6-� Z c oLOnai cN n-1;:yoo //I \ N TOY °feu y'� PASS <o EARN wavAwT s xo®r aFmr+m wmmI ryp \ po 'yf]p 'J- W1N�4' \ ROCHE OF WAY wvmKATED BY NmW NOS SCALE NNSO CENSEWI E �� p . / \ OY OF a\ 0 Ra / CO < _ S I" AS THE E c V \ � '�. •. \ k \x2 � \ \ mE1AHEAVIVerowncES wnwv y' aYQ j� ?`� $a /\� \'dy \ \ ties _ "w.�' zSey T\� WHY AN AY Au II a°>qyh /r �!a ° �C \ *e2s> T 1 \ \ mm � ✓% � \ \'J �HEaBY SARNIA' \ \ ' 00"0Q' C P.V. 0AT 'E/� jIEPEdr RAinNmS �/ \ E �/ r d �`.C_sY. \'s \ Orcy°, N 9v9'sfi'F\ AD-53<1 B']6" wIP�� / j y /aY S/nom\:L:\ 0 1 Y3G[ \\ \ \ / 1H. LC �6 ..�,eYOa'e aEn�P AT 29.02' �ti'C° /tl OE / / // \ p6 YOw. `E Bu,E O[ aWO6 ISZ r / C,H /IFREDV 4UFC➢ / \ \ RE<NS[d'[opi cp01. AS MONTH LL C ARRAW AN CLAPS / / DIGS pI NIFYTHE. UCEsS PuO:EZSpmt LM9 0 �2V au U: LOT 2 / \ql a �� I wPY ,1NAT ' "."".��.:oia° s� i6IMwY�:D w< FDL0WN4 aOx�ACpq \4 .�Yq / H Lo ;, . I BANAANASATFmu FEPnfm {/�/ kL$O,C. B SI I . O M12I Pg`v \ v-3O` POINT OF PART AT THE N [EFT F SU III 31MENNEWS A, DO IF MAE �u.•mJ N a Btlp IT y Cxn�Eieo \ °S a/S�[`35` /�/ \ \ o '!sC AN' EELwxw4 / "ESO a�o[w NETWORK"OUNCROETC,SPy EWER OOMMAGAT s`E% /\ Afn^ AYT^ 1 1 Acro THEREOF iiA• 11G/G REG / / \ �0 9w � wiT39 P/hR FB 2LP < A`y \. / / I ECM H LACCE HE DISTANCE OF INCONTINENCE NORTH 40 ALI 11 A CERAMIC 5 AY nAx xO. DESCRIBED Ok(kAVA 70 p `THE O x o MY M SCHULHOF COM Or UX CHAT 34, ON CONE E Y6n Laq SHOALS AN PHOTO 00 SECONDS WAIT AN AMI DISTANAT A 3 A- D B� MGM OF w H WEST, A US 70 Do ACT TO A PONT HOW THE EASTERLY LAG OF NoWbot ROAD / LACE)8 I Au L MODICATED OF KAT OF 17°� Exe : iRso HE s LOT � s 5$ n 1i� o LEANED TOUCH IF DEMNU TIC I _ 11 R x - G ([�S. „ONCE Sot M SIGN N s IJSJ [ \\ \ Sr' \'+ Y`/ /` TO THE RISKY PART: EDGED EEEe SU GENLAC 5 2639.49' REC n � \ �qT° / / READING Sw,X 30 ORGANIC oIw wEZr Ax , 106 M12 REC .D. I pT \ gj, \wf` IS p D a BE V. / CLAIMING OF 176 HE FE ARSE NRVATME' onxEED \1 4P' /r v. w \ b. .\ SEE JET.e -4' S�a.w // e`"QNO v % c :°nnw SAM us-EmE E xcxoxa"n°cwH maE: .41910 1 ,C \ OIDNAC OYi 0 iiX[PSE7 wS WAST. An AMC FEW j z19 z:a E \ \ .a pa'E ti,{+/ o / °°.`" / /\ �°;rATED BY PLAT OF SAO HEARTLAAND A HAD RKINCEaw TT 1, TH • N /Q� / N6B2:Sfi El a9X \ T E w% Nj0•Ny / , \ SOUTH q DAEMON ix ¢xviCS Z[ SECONDS EAST /q s.6 w \ \ s+% /'�`1v P,v. c of / e` .4 / °E. A LY CNC OAF ,"''TAF�T� TCEASE 10 THERPONT HOURSxl A. 126.00 ftEC� % \ ./q / 6 / / N MET, Omwmx0 x me"o DISTANCE OF[°R[p[i4",E R. SJ0.00' REQ Al �l / LOT S ry a � � \ ID_ I 4CNT' . e N _ O \CHO. LRG.e \ / 145 `Mm \ \ SMGA2M LA'L / pG / SOUTHOEEGREESF11 MKTU ItiOG=* CASNLVNG AND A 5\}6��C5'S5' W REcC. a9.e]B 4 efi.,T' >/ y P -6B T,A nSTAxC¢ ICI Am 39.p9:REC. / � SIDEWALK NWTObE'N' ,Tp 1565' / .'PO /F �\ F OOOLFEETESUOTEX°AO ALCNOFO DEAPNO SM1MI DEUE Rv y5.00' I Z/ \ / S REB Y% D' O E. ^ / b C wwres n MMADS CAST. AN ARC ONSTAMAE OF %n FEET TO HEREBY LflN1T9 HEREBY LRAIRC L S3911 DUST / CHO. BRG.e 6 a. / P V OWNED CLBVATUR AM DIE WESTERLY LNEVOR HVn6TLAND W, 5 01.24]6" WIT REC \ A pV ALOING TSAM WITTIVLLY LED - HT 2m[ \ �zwEeY' OPPMffO �H D 6flG• / / �/\ t6,x \ PI W FARES A 11I OF XDCO PERT, AB,EWIf. A CHICAGO ° ',Hod"C / \ \ DECREES OB xvwTES xa 6RCWN6 EA4L, AS AMC Chi S \ 53996'41'W 'H' 0 3 UP A / /' / TG FIAT TO A POW OF KNOW COMATWfi THECA WRm \�L \ 00.62' / ¢ „7 / V \ AO WEE,w`V Lw: OEwC g A CFM CWAE NA TO LEE A "HEAR OF 507.00 to. ^ ' Aa_ f A'E'p \ ' G X / i / JIM Q,ivRW vIX� w ,n . i. Nmi. ALSO FORD n¢ RAW o[ REGmwtl. n rtEXDF TOM ///--- °pc CEGIf\1 l ° IRE' P.v. t of _ - _ u oiiuR Laao PORTLAND a TO TIE SGATHI COINER ON Lot 71 A SAID \I \ ODIC TO RUN wAxiE=\ / / !'3' L DIRECTION TTOCIADIANA USE 'OF THE C IoMI INC \7 \ pax OF m z�' -( / A, Oa v ILLINOIS.� n / U o u�'i1v1s" w ,,,Y sj1D `i / \\ \ -"` r 1 STRICTLY '^ /^ 21, PV. D.E. / "aT¢NR N STANDARDS TO A GOODMAN MEAN A 74.14' REC. jN_ EBY WmwVIED/ __ \\ :;, \ \ I TH THER CMI THAT THE PROPERTY SHOWN °X-a Y AI HERE R- Sw..- REC \\ ACTMOOVr.,Nx HEAMC ONE-HALF v LAN WHO WHOM / CHO.SRG.= I \ / MOON nSEEO n c Ns AREASsSJw�ro 5 SJ'OB'05' E REC. �/ Om£D BY D1V5ax 12 OF ARTICLE n OF THE SAM / ' \ \ ,JN \\ \ LEGEND SPECIAL ROOM ox ALGERIA DREATFeAw6EYT THE FICAPPAt"Kati MAP/r WISHED .P ,1A L pwrz \\ SUMM90N SOUNBAAY I/ S 30339]' E REC. \ \ / \ „a A-1168.9]' REC. \\ _ EX18IING LOT LINE D:Y�ER UNDER NY HAND A'N4SEAL IRS .m DAT OF NUMERSHED 179341 MEMO C 99 0.v 4 ` CA 333,00' REC. = LOT UN LINE ° u \ p9 1 CND 33.0 N B4'p6'N" E REC LOT LINE 9 A. 3a.J1' REC. \ EASEMENT LINE {jwynlsc f /xwt6�E✓ 5 / / qe 35.00' 0.EC \ —_ — BUIIDING SEIfl4CK LINE (— 1 b°q D ERGTA S 7739.2 E REC. — A.O.W. LINE PUT. NICE NAM7,10F FLOWN SHOPLATCAD Pav ", �m w¢ wm<n1w HEMMAND CENTER SUEDMSIDN UNff 1 ROAKE ANO ASSOCIATES, INC. RICHARD MARKER ASSOCIATES, INC. RnEEFU 654 HEAE IAND DRNE M :Jp3 DNAL, PORT OF SU90MSION NONZLUNTHVA ENGINEERS 1TIRKVIUE. ILuNOIS 66560 DONAMO r:NS/ww/ua1 Rte \WU\CDNMPZ6 M^ U\I <eaol aw-02arz BHO PAX HOMO) BaW-arzaT (530) 553-3322 rue INNER m/J0/m 31 J.Oa Filed for Recol^r1 in J(L- Nif )I GOLAN11'y, ( LL 1. NO .( f; STATE OF ILLINOIS ) tut AND RSON vY.-•U/t-c0U5 R't 01 19 Clm, ss II], ofIdIINCG c8, 00 COUNTY OFKENDALL ) , l i ORDINANCE NO. 200 — ( 7 ,> ' i AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A SECOND AMENDMENT TO HEARTLAND SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, Kendall County, Illinois, that a certain Second Amendment to Annexation and Planned Unit Development i Agreement permitting the subdivision of Lot 3 in Heartland Center Unit I of the real property i previously annexed to the United City of Yorkville in accordance with the Plat of Subdivision attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, said Second Amendment to Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement has been drafted and has been considered by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the legal owners of record of the territory which is the subject of said Agreement are ready, willing and able to enter into said Agreement and to perform the obligations as required hereunder; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS : l Section 1 : That the Mayor and City Clerk are herewith authorized and directed to execute, —1— on behalf of the City, a Second Amendment to Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement permitting the subdivision of Lot 3 in Heartland Center Unit I of the real property previously annexed to the United City of Yorkville in accordance with the Plat of Subdivision attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A", a copy of the Second Amendment to Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement is attached hereto and i made apart hereof. Section 2: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. I WANDA OHARE I JOSEPH BESCO VALERIE BURD PAUL JAMES _ LARRY KOT = MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS _ RICHARD STICKA APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of j , A.D. 20C� MAYOR PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of I J (. 7_ , ;` A.D. 201 Attest. r�"r It CITY CLERL� i i Prepared by: Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge St. Yorkville, IL 60560 630.553 .9500 I Ii I � I I i I ! i I I I —3— STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )ss. COUNTY OF KENDALL ) li SECOND AMENDMENT TO HEARTLAND SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, HOBSON HOLLOW, INC., an Illinois Corporation is the OWNER of certain real property within the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois commonly,., known as "HEARTLAND SUBDIVISION'; and WHEREAS, RICHARD MARKER ASSOCIATES, INC„ an Illinois Corporation, is the DEVELOPER of certain real property within the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois commonly known as "HEARTLAND SUBDIVISION'; and WHEREAS, HOBSON HOLLOW, INC., an Illinois Corporation and RICHARD MARKER ASSOCIATES, INC., an Illinois Corporation are herein after collectively referred to as Petitioner; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner requests an amendment to the Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement executed on December 29, 1999 to permit the subdivision of Lot 3 in Heartland Center Unit 1 of the real property annexed to the United City of Yorkville in accordance with the Plat of Subdivision attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Plan Commission of the United City of Yorkville and it was unanimously recommended to the City Council to approve the requested —1 — i I change in the Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement, and further that this Second Amendment to Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement shall only affect the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A'; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held at the City Council of the United City of Yorkville as required by Illinois Compiled Statues: NOW THEREFORE, upon motion duly made, seconded, and approved by a majority of those voting, the following Second Amendment is made to the Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement of Heartland Subdivision entered into by and between the United City of Yorkville and the OWNER/DEVELOPER of the subject property as follows: 1) INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: All part ies hereto agree that the above contained recitals are an integral part of this Agreement and hereby adopt those recitals as part of this Agreement. 2) AUTHORIZATION OF AMENDMENT: OWNER/DEVELOPER warrant that the parties hereto have full and express authority to enter into an Amendment of the original Planned Unit Development Agreement to which this Amendment is appended pursuant to that Agreement. 3) That upon approval of this Second Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be permitted to subdivide Lot 3 in Heartland Center Unit 1 in I accordance with Exhibit "A", 4) The various parts, sections, and clauses of this Agreement are hereby declared to be severable. If any part, sentence, paragraph, section, or clause is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be —2— i affected thereby. 5) Any prior Agreement between the parties or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of this Agreement are null and void as to the extent of such conflict. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from and after its execution, passage and approval as provided by law. i i i i —3— DEVELOPER: RICHARD MARKER ASSOCIATES, INC., an Illinois Corporation By: _ O . Attest: — DATED : ISL I I �I I —4— I, OWNER: HOBSON HOLLOW, INC., an Illinois/CJ or�poration By: � IG� •u(� Si Attest. a �G Q ' Se-e" 2- DATED: /Yo c I I� I , i i I i —5— i UNITED CITY OF YORKVJI LE , > MAYOR ATTEST: '� �'(� ( �C I )l �� - '� -Z i � ( � P -fir ��r „ . .�• q •. ITY CLERK ? o , <� „ DATED: I I � i Prepared by & Return to : Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 630.553.9500 —6- I Heartland Center - Lot 3 Legal Description: Part of the East half of Section 28, Township 37 North Range 7, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in the United City of Yorkville, Bristol Township, Kendall County, Illinois Net area of Lot 3 = 8.409 acres I i I i i i i I VIII FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION g� HEARTLAND CENTER RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 IN UNIT 1 TIFF =s Q. �+' , IRf N MC GS, XNf CO' Srnw $ robAIIP 57 wORTi MXK ,a wnudn. h q,y ' 7. e,sr or ra T MNW#TL uuioux, aws% 1CMIOIP. s EtiMl CWxR. iWXgS �+� gwe,(e[ wauwri XCT MS. M IDR - W A16.T �iafe65 o<��ww,nm+• 4 s. ,.t a'I�.. , ' r i A ' LOOZOLOPFUT TO 'flK / °S„T q �S�E . '• `O'. � � ° —sr e � s wm,+.omOF, TWO on or R,coca . .,., . ,.n . %. '' a " TOkO,. T Ip,,0 \ / / tee, /' \^\.�°.n . as wh aoeT.le ° r0,. ° •/ , . nn . . AT IF 536']YT , ., w.Ay..P4�y�, • \ �T.qo ba LOT 6 j LIZ f \�\y-y)- Env .m"cir.,�, ^ ,^"� LOT 6 �. p,Y: , o / ��., 'ul-- YI mr'COM OF 44 TIT, LIT �I y/l +• .\ s, TI,i „ LOT 5 [ LFITOI ,F ITT, ' �TVl 00 •"Pq �. % w\. ITT IL' IT ILL. oT �a� LDT 4 y :i d`�e°!/TILT y 11. h '\ �• '. n. his; It I,.�I,Sws t ,�ITT, liv&w In ..••� `•\ • vrt.van11 S. A: u2Y FOOD i t9 / • � / /. •.\� `•\ mxmrs au=N w TT[, m ttaaST w.TC„ a'.".- ' ' �-•� r q �` : LOT 3 e;3. @L":. � 0„l3 NOO ^�,/\ ,g\ _i�� 490. le.,, w,mi• s°.r: � ' n� �/ \rv� <o,.,...,.ou O.IT Lt.f _LL' L`6 F'. 1,1 FILL., 1� IFFOLIFIL OIO�fQF� I)COLLOTO M W W TITTLE .111 AFFLATI, AYINMI ,L I”IF,FILM"Fro a vocILY omaLeffm FIT 'K AF IV ' % A' . IF S4100 vx i �`i O / � `. ,. li�Rw-P .art mOwIGN caD F,;u,T w2 .< a"'°",eR44 „„ � e / b •fie '� � — seorrswx Smmmzr w ICI '�\ .A( < M:T.» ` i� ,,. FILL acI _— cunwc wr uvc „< ,.wm.OFF w a, ''1 ..n3FT .x CWT F: 1w1 . a __ � _ _ __ awe 0 IT 0 5 goAKE Arv0 ASSaraATES, INC. p(;y}pp LL1Q1(ER 4550daTE5 INC NFMfWN OEIQfEN R DWIIIISION flF LOT 0 IN VN I a ev' 65t ,YA9fiµ0 PP,E iirvi PUi CF SIBOM510.q :DRM4F IWxOb W560 o. ,o°->a: . e.w IXeq eoe-„o, ZOOLITO wq, ... .m w �onwA f Or 2 FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION MIMI HEARTLAND CENTER RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 IN UNIT 1 PART H rR I $ sr axa ammau \ / - .�iLAt S6 THE i D ML'IHAN. JN E O la" m M wrvi ,Y O NET AKAwn - a. . $ 73u " % e^ j w u ri °> If Aft r Pala: A�j °. tore LOT 2 ow .\ a ".? l4°:� .3"6... W, . _. tme \ I, � / Am AkI III DUO If If \4 " ` YnMe`u'"' M,.;.•"./ / :r " ao"Cs zcs9-. LOT `c pppp Iola MI 7 s At MI 11 'Mal J O / i�• i ^ qt & t LOT'S / .r.....'m. �mAes.v„lI mot mw 11 III,AkAI m.� „ f/ e' gy`LOOT leavam let a 41 .1 11 .ssN IT o >/// .. ./F .\ aw IS �' LOT 3 °'b2 °shy os�' \ / ...o�«ooe ate."., .,o oH,w. .K.or. \ i " ga<\�fp1 �� "S '.� $9 �,,,w.x• '" ,y ' Np � `\ \ "` .a".,.....N� ...s. ..".a "< ...m..... g All CT; -�'� ,� ems/ am p6 /' \ snmrvsnn cauroMr ....".",.® .,,,..< MC«» ,� "1.M ."".w. .",.. CAR PAPHALt of " _ Nro. cwnw mt lmt Mm.au..>. � "� / % �"\y\ T e uc \1 \ w x umY. r'«c CENTS? UM `^\i Am l4,1M si \\�� `..2t \\ " I / / R. 15DWAM sm.m \ \ r Fn91¢M Lif m"or UK [ faOS\KE Afk V !ASSOCIATES, wc. RIONR0 NNZKER ASSaK INC. HFfRilPNO CFMER RFSl18DM40N OF LOT } IN UNIT 1 'e rc 65t M/AIW.D pEK Talk PlAr Cf Nddu9CN I'm o` N YfMXYR1E UUI NI m O mo-oaa . •.x tavi Nec-"ae" (eb) 553-JJ$3 m: H¢/m M G7 ' vm w. Z ®s,.ui.v9n m..Ixmlz SIGN CQ 10 ' O '. across, 11 Heartland Center f DOUBLE-FACED ILLUMINATED SIGN FABRICATE AND INSTALL SIGN OF ALUMINUM AND STEEL ANGLE. 24101. FACES TO BE WHITE ACRYLIC WITH COPY APPLIED FIRST SURFACE. MEMEL EXPOSED METAL SURFACES TO BE COATED WITH ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE. INTERNAL ILLUMINATION TO BE HIGH OUTPUT FLUORESCENT LAMPS. SCALE - II l' ANY 1' F IN5TALLATION IN5TRUCTION5 SET 10' X 21' STEEL PIPE IN CONCRETE FOOTING TO DEPRI OF 6'. STAGE &' X 11' 5TEEL PIPE ON TOP. SIGN TO BE PERPENOIODUR TO KT 54. CONNECT TO ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BE PRO✓MED BY OTHERS PRIOR TO INSTALL. MASONRY BYO ER5. I IN Route 58 r' sm" HEARTLAND CENTER Fashion Rf °v4 °^02175'!1 3 o'm 12/19/12 "m Aurora. Illinois WW4 CID 898 5900 office wrim"c OW e98 W l fa. YORKVILLE. IL Me NOTE ixie YMYmw 4"a rRWEAry as"FOY a CO, 161PTO YaVROYlCF0.t�.OR OIMtO M Wr PJW4011 tlVfMMp MMg1 rg Ar iY40. aWMBawNWMYnLl IN WYYWIW OF Trials Y IMP 34 E Veterans IND erk 1. =f g r 0 ` � F ys � _ Heartland Dr United City of Yorkville G/S The Data is provided without warranty or any representation of y accuracy,timeliness,or completeness.It is the responsibility of the Parcel Data and Aerial Photography "Requester"to determine accuracy,timeliness,completeness,and W `d Provided By Kendall County G/S appropriateness of its use. The United City of Yorkville makes no warranties,expressed or implied,to the use of the Data. S STATE OF ILLINOIS ) COUNTY OF KENDALL ) MUTUAL AND RECIPROCAL SIGN EASEMENT BY AND BETWEEN ANIRI, LLC AND HEARTLAND CENTER OWNERS OF RECORD NOW COMES ANIRI, LLC as Owner of the Real Property described in Exhibit "A", and the Owners of Record of the Real Property described in Exhibit `B" who hereby agree to the Mutual and Reciprocal Sign Easement as contained herein in consideration of the Mutual Covenants between each party hereto: Section 1 Grant of Easement ANIRI, LLC hereby grants a Mutual and Reciprocal Sign Easement for the use of the percentage of the sign face on the sign located on the Real Property described in Exhibit "A solely for on-site advertising for the businesses conducted by the Owners of Record described in Exhibit `B". Section 2 Reservation of Signage Space and Use GRANTOR, ANIRI, LLC hereby reserves the use of 50% at the top of said sign located on the Real Property described in Exhibit "A" for the operation of its Dairy Queen Business and any related business developed on said lot owned by GRANTOR. At no time shall any GRANTEE of this Mutual and Reciprocal Easement have a right to use any percentage of the signed face that is in excess of the percentage of use set out in the attached Exhibit "C". Section 3 Grant of License GRANTOR hereby grants a license for any GRANTEE hereunder to install at the expense of said GRANTEE their name and image on their percentage use of signage. Said license shall include the right for agents or employees of the GRANTEE to come onto the premises of GRANTOR solely and exclusively for sign maintenance and repair. GRANTOR reserves the right to move the location of the existing center sign located on its real property in the event the same does not conform to the overall development plan of GRANTOR with the Untied City of Yorkville or as requested by Dairy Queen as the Franchisor ofGRANTOR. Section 4 Maintenance Costs GRANTOR and GRANTEES shall mutually reciprocally be responsible for payment of electrical service, sign maintenance maintenance and repair costs, including any annual insurance charged to maintain said sign in direct proportion to the percentage of sign use used by GRANTOR and GRANTEE. Section 5 Duration of Sign Agreement This License and Lease shall continue until such time as there is any legal requirement for removal of said sign or so long as the parties hereto are in need of maintenance of the common sign for their business usage. No modification of said sign in terms of percentage of use or size shall be permitted unless approved by the United City of Yorkville and GRANTOR. 2 Section 6 Indemnification of Grantor GRANTEES and their successors and assigns hereby indemnify from any claim or liability the GRANTOR for property damage or any injury resulting as to the use, maintenance, construction, or location of said advertising common signage. Section 7 Termination of Lease In the event any Owner of Real Property with Heartland Center fails to timely pay assessments due, GRANTOR shall provide thirty (30) days written notice of termination of signage rights and said right of any GRANTEE to use said signage shall be terminated if the default continues beyond said thirty (30) day notice period. Section 8 Integration Clause This Lease Agreement shall constitute the entire Agreement of the parties hereto and constitute the sole obligation of GRANTOR respecting contributions for maintenance of common areas of any kind within Heartland Development, its obligation to participate in the common signage for said Heartland Center being the sole and only obligation imposed upon ANIRI, LLC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned parties have executed this Agreement set opposite their name: ANIRI, LLC thorled Manager tuber Dated: 031k2 3 NORTH STAR TRUST COMPANY AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO MB FINANCIAL BANK N.A. AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO OAK BROOK BANK AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRSUT AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 21 , 2001 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 3191 Dated: - 'Ar 4 Dated 9A 142 5 IYK 5. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS LOT 2 IN HEARTLAND CENTER RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 IN HEARTLAND CENTER SUBd'CV�SI'ON . UNIT 1 , ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED APRIL Sr 2005 AS DOCUMENT ' 200500009772 AND CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED OCTOBER 8 . 2008 AS DOCUMENT 200800022051 , IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLEr KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS i copyright AmoHan Land Title AssoolAtlon. All Aghts reserved. The use cf this Form Is rsatftiad b ALTA licenseaa and ALTA members In good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are proMbited. Repdnted under license horn the Amedcen Land Tide A.maelaeon. conUCOe .tvoaocc 2JM PAGE A2 06/05/ 12 14`C05 : 40' Appraisal f 728 L. L elrran.r Parkway, YmBui&, Il , KRUEGERAPPRAISALSERVICES INC FkNo 8400-0377 Page 16 SITE SKETCH lacketone FFF � � ,� .- • ' . ..�r mow. .. fFA a e e. w . MAP w r w ' a.. wg+rW,w.rww.a "' 1 ,; y / /y r[% le Bank A 6oldstdt' (A sail '` 1 >m p f .w � Its . .. - lot IF 'may t .ITq J 4 r�oocc � T ighthottee 1 AIR EXHIBIT " B " 08 / 31 / 2012 11 : 42 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J . KRAMER 002 1002 l"AI1113fF "C , Tame of Owner PIN Number or LgLil � 1 'eicQwagc Assigned of f)escripticnt of Property that Signijew permitted to be used . ..... , . . .. _ . ...-... _� _.T .. . for Muntain � i lut,ltt to Use+ on Rual Property of ( irim _:._ . .__.' ANII I I , L.0 1 0l ' of 110 ntivul l Cntei 50'io ( toll % 01 si4n) .Ianit`: Raton;. .. _. Lot 7 ofTTcaulpnd (. utter ;?5" 6 ( 1011 lowu ',! of sie,n ) Chin ego Title. T and Trust Lots .3 , 4 5 end G of 25(X / / 11 I le Center .inland Ce l-- °� W D u n n c It I iy ij I r II I I p I 3�p Ak r4 I r4 N � s T l .... ..r._.. -. Con a I € r �T- 1 o f}........i. .....i 1 I :____ • �L m 0 a All 'o Ee lot WI.-I IN 4 g�- nL3 FgE i s3 al `: $ . z • Kq ET Cwm ° a I I T I T s a McHugh Road m � o /yam - w P `1 Tai 1 V nF� \ ''\ � a � o rp � \j, °1 n I Ny ��/ g •• / f PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL PC 2013-03 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT Veterans Way, LLC, Petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting a major amendment the Second Amendment to the Heartland Subdivision Annexation and Planned Unit Development dated January 11, 2005 related to the Heartland Business Center to permit the placement of an additional ten foot by sixteen foot (10'x16') sign with eleven (11)tenant sign panels within a driveway median of the subject property. The real property consists of approximately 5.1 acres of the common area located generally south of U.S. Route 34; west of McHugh Road; and north of Heartland Drive at 728 E. Veterans Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois. The Permanent Index Numbers' (PIN) of the subject parcels are as follows: 02-28-253-011 02-28-253-012 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the City Council of the United City of Yorkville will conduct a public hearing on said application on Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 7 p.m. at the United City of Yorkville City Council Chambers, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, 60560. The public hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice being published. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. Any written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville City Clerk, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, and will be accepted up to the date of the public hearing. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. BETH WARREN City Clerk By: Lisa Pickering Deputy Clerk A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 040 Legal ❑ Public Hearing#2 Finance ■ EST. 1836 Engineer ■ ^�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development : CC 2013-12 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ■ Parks and Recreation ■ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Proposed FY 2013-2014 Budget Meeting and Date: City Council—March 12, 2013 Synopsis: Public Hearing Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: FISCAL YEAR 2014 BUDGET County Seat of Kendall Coun MR 1, 2013 m APRIL 30, 2014 ti uF - EST. � O � � r ' 1 United City of Yorkville, Illinois Fiscal Year 2014 Budget May 1, 2013 to April 30, 2014 Elected Officials Mayor: Gary J. Golinski 1 st Ward Alderman: Carlo Colosimo 1 st Ward Alderman: Ken Koch 2nd Ward Alderman: Jackie Milschewski 2nd Ward Alderman: Larry Kot 3rd Ward Alderman: Marty Munns 3rd Ward Alderman: Chris Funkhouser 4th Ward Alderman: Rose Spears 4th Ward Alderman: Diane Teeling City Clerk: Beth Warren Administration City Administrator: Bart Olson Director of Finance: Rob Fredrickson Director of Public Works: Eric Dhuse Chief of Police: Rich Hart Director of Community Development: Krysti Barksdale-Noble Interim Director of Parks & Recreation: Laura Schraw Library Director: Michelle Pfister TABLE OF CONTENTS Budget Summary Budget Memorandum 1 Revenues by Category 36 Expenditures by Category 37 Fund Balance History 38 Revenue Budget Summary 39 Expenditure Budget Summary 40 Fund Balance Summary 41 General Fund General(0 1)Fund Summary 42 Revenue Detail 43 Administration 45 Finance 48 Community Relations 50 Engineering 52 Police 54 Community Development 57 Public Works 59 Administrative Services 62 Other Budgetary Funds Fox Hill SSA(11)Fund 65 Sunflower SSA(12)Fund 67 Motor Fuel Tax(15)Fund 69 Municipal Building(16)Fund 72 City-Wide Capital(23)Fund 74 Vehicle&Equipment(25)Fund 77 Debt Service (42)Fund 80 Water(5 1)Fund 82 Sewer(52)Fund 86 Land Cash(72)Fund 90 Parks &Recreation(79)Fund 93 Recreation Center(80)Fund 97 Library Operations (82)Fund 100 Library Debt Service(83)Fund 104 Library Capital(84)Fund 106 Fox Industrial TIF (85)Fund 108 Countryside TIF(87) 110 Downtown TIF (88)Fund 112 Miscellaneous Consolidated Budget Sheets 114 Budgeted Cash Flow Estimations 117 Originally Proposed Property Tax&Abatement Schedule 121 Allocated Revenues &Expenditures-Aggregated 122 o Memorandum To: City Council EST. _ 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -4 -� CC: Department Heads County Scat a� p Date: February 7, 2013 proposal L budget bJ Suject: FY 14 E g p P Purpose: Please accept this report and budget spreadsheet as an updated proposal for the FY 14 budget. The budget proposed for approval by the City Council is for expenses and revenues scheduled to be spent and collected, respectively,between May 1, 2013 and April 30, 2014. Background and "the big picture": The City Council last discussed a comprehensive budget proposal in April 2012, when we approved the FY 13 budget, with additional information for FY 14, FY 15, FY 16, and FY 17. This approval represented the first five year budget for the City, and we return to a five year-budget again this year. The main discussion for last year's budget involved the relatively good years of FY 13 and FY 14, and then a deteriorating budget picture in FY 15 and beyond. In this year's proposed budget, we stabilize the general fund at above 15% fund balance through FY 17 and propose to draw down fund balance across all funds for each year over the next five fiscal years. We have done this with extremely conservative or no revenue growth projections, implementing a road infrastructure fee, implementing a sewer infrastructure fee,reducing the water infrastructure fee, severely restricting future hires in all departments and total cuts of certain City services. While last year's five year picture was that of potential for serious financial trouble in FY 16 and FY 17, we can say with this budget proposal that FY 16, FY 17, and FY 18 are somewhat better. In last year's budget narrative, we stated that a $3,000,000 budget-wide fund balance was the threshold into major financial issues, including short term borrowing. For this budget proposal, we do not expect any year-end budget-wide fund balance to dip below $3.75 million. As we stated last year, budgets three years into the future and beyond(FY 16+) are highly variable, and should be monitored throughout the next two fiscal years. The stabilization of the general fund and the planned reduction of the City's sewer fund in this proposal is a targeted decision to give the City maximum flexibility in future years and to improve the City's bond rating,which will in turn improve the City's financial picture. For example, over the last several fiscal years the City has maintained an adequate cash flow position, but almost none of this cash was available to the general fund—as it was being held by the sewer and water funds. While this money is allowed to be used on a day-to-day basis to "pay the bills", it is not a solid financial principle to continue to be flush with cash in the enterprise funds and restricted funds (i.e. TIF funds) and be barren of unrestricted funds in the general fund. We have started to reverse this trend in FY 13, and hope to continue that trend over the next five fiscal years, even if it means a slight decrease in aggregate fund balance from our FY 13 figures. 1 Changes in budgeting Last year's budget narrative memo included an overview by discussing the "easy years vs. the hard years." In last year's budget proposal, we had forecasted two years of strength, a year of plateau, and two years of fiscal distress. This year, we have proposed a number of significant policy changes which alter that budget evolution slightly,based on our past two years of budget success. We propose five straight years of gradual fiscal decline due to funding many large capital projects. However, this year's budget proposal has stability in FY 17 and FY 18. Accordingly, we have chosen to give an overview of each fiscal year separately, with emphasis given to how this year's proposal is different from last year's proposal. We've completed two major changes in this year's budget. The first is the consolidation of the various impact fee funds into a vehicle and equipment fund. The Public Works Capital, Parks Capital and Police Capital funds were consolidated into this one fund, based on the recommendation of our auditors and management's discretion. Each impact fee fund balance will be tracked separately at the bottom of this fund. The second major change is that we've "trued up"the City's operational funds by transferring money from operations to close out the municipal building impact fee fund and REC Center funds, and zeroed out all long-term deficits in the MFT fund, city wide capital fund, and the new vehicle and equipment fund. Year-by-year summary,FY 13 projections In April 2012, we approved the FY 13 budget with a$931,000 general fund surplus, and a moderate overall budget surplus ($130,000). Our current projections have us at a $2,175,000 general fund surplus and a total budgeted surplus of $2,300,000. The major movement on our financial picture has been a result of conservative revenue projections and controlled expenses from our departments. Municipal sales taxes are likely to be lower than FY 12,but they are performing much better than we had expected, given the closure of ProBuild. We conservatively estimated non-home rule sales taxes at $1.5M (currently projected at $1.8M). State income taxes have been unexpectedly high, and are projected to eclipse budgeted amounts by over$200,000. We settled a lawsuit with Fox Moraine over unpaid landfill application fees from 2006, resulting in an $115,000 payment to the City. We are predicting that every operating department in the City will be under budget, except for the REC Center. All of this results in our prediction that fund balance in the City's general fund will be at$3.445 million or 31.8% at the end of FY 13. This marks the first time that fund balance in the City's general fund has been above 15% since FY 08. However, we stated in the FY 12 audit presentation that two major issues remained to be resolved—the closure of the municipal building impact fee fund($573,000 fund debt) and the REC Center(estimated FY 13 fund debt at $468,000). Year-by-year summary,FY 14 proposed budget For FY 14, we propose that the general fund be approved with a $700,000 deficit,resulting in the general fund's —30% fund balance to be reduced to —20%,but still within the City's 15-25% fund balance policy range. With the Countryside TIF payout expected in late calendar year 2013, we expect the total fund balance of the City(which is an indicator of overall cash flow) to decrease by $2.7 million from FY 13 to FY 14. We feel this is acceptable given the relatively stable budget picture over the next four fiscal years, and the significant budget improvement in FY 13. 2 This FY 14 proposal is different from last year's FY 14 budget proposal. In last year's budget proposal, we predicted FY 14 would be a relatively break-even year in the general fund: slightly more than $12.5 million in revenues, and slightly less than $12.5 million in expenses, for a $36,000 surplus. Last year, we did not anticipate the rapid deterioration of the REC Center's budget caused by the City's decision not to purchase the facility, we had not yet planned to close out the municipal building fund, and we did not budget to eliminate the anticipated negative fund balance position of the public works capital fund resulting from debt service payments associated with the 185 Wolf Street building. All of these items will significantly impact the general fund. On the positive side, we have seen improvements in the municipal sales tax, non-home rule sales tax, and state income tax estimates. Further, we will realize savings in code enforcement officer part-time salaries (even while expanding hours from FY 13), in-house inspections, liability insurance and legal fees. We propose to cut City participation in Kendall Area Transit due to its relatively low use and under the argument that this service would be most equitably funded via the County budget, and not a hybrid City-County funding system. We propose to cut leaf pickup services here, for reasons outlined below. Finally, we propose to eliminate the senior garbage subsidy over a two year period,beginning with a partial rollback in FY 14. Pursuant to the City Council goals, we have focused on road improvements in the FY 14 budget. Between the MFT and City wide capital budgets, the City has set aside $1 million in FY 14. This budget is made possible by the aforementioned utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee,which is a modification of the sewer infrastructure fee, and is described in the "items of note" section in further detail. From an overall budget surplus perspective, last year's budget proposal had anticipated a modest decrease of$246,000. Our current FY 14 budget proposal anticipates a deficit amount of$2.7 million. This ten-fold change is due primarily to the inclusion of the Countryside TIF incentive payout, and secondarily the closure of the REC Center. Again, we feel this is acceptable in the context of the five- year budget. Year-by-year summary, FY 15 proiected budget For FY 15, we proposed that the general fund be approved with a $630,000 surplus, bringing our fund balance back up to 27%. This surplus is made possible by the imposition of the utility-bill- based road infrastructure fee. With the year-end in-flux of Game Farm Road bond proceeds, the City will be in an artificially-positive total budget surplus. Without those proceeds, the City's overall budget is in deficit in FY 15. This year's FY 15 proposal is significantly different from last year's FY 15 proposal,which had suggested that the City would have a$300,000 general fund deficit. Revenues in non-home rule sales tax and state income tax have significantly outperformed our estimates, and we have revised our FY 15 estimates higher. With the opening of the NCG movie theater in FY 14, we expect amusement taxes to significantly increase in FY 151. With the imposition of the utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee, the City's general fund does not have to transfer any money into the City wide capital fund to finance the FY 15 Road to Better Roads program. Our proposal to rescind the senior discount on garbage rates continues with another partial rollback in FY 15. Among these financial improvements, a lower-than- previously-expected health insurance increases throughout all departments, lower health insurance costs for elected officials caused by non-participation, and reduced legal fees. These cost reductions are 1 As a reminder,our economic incentive agreement with the developer requires rebate of a portion of the movie theater amusement taxes for the first several years of the project. 3 offsetting increases in Parks and Recreation costs due to the REC Center closure, Public Works vehicle replacements, and salary line-item increases caused by a change in our budgeting assumptions. Pursuant to the City Council goals, we have focused on road improvements in the FY 15 budget. Between the MFT and City wide capital budgets,the City has set aside $1 million in FY 15. This budget is made possible by the aforementioned utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee. We propose to bond for Game Farm Road improvements in FY 15, and start the project in earnest in late FY 15. This schedule fits within the City's timeframe for receiving federal stimulus funds for the project. This budget contains funding for the City's portion of the US 34 project between 47 and Orchard Road, currently scheduled with IDOT for construction funding in FY 15. From a total budget perspective, we had expected FY 15 to be the first of three years of significant reduction in the City's aggregated fund balance. Last year's budget proposal had FY 15 showing a $1.4 million total reduction. This year's budget proposal has a $3.5 million temporary surplus, due to the Game Farm Road bond. Without those bond proceeds, the City's aggregate fund balance would decrease by over$1 million. Year-by-year summary, FY 16 proiections For FY 16, we have proposed a $501,000 surplus in the general fund, resulting in a projected fund balance of 30%. This surplus is made possible by the imposition of the utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee. With the year-long outflow of Game Farm Road expenditures, the City will be in a deficit total budget position due to the spend down of bond proceeds from the previous year. Without these capital expenditures, the City's aggregate budget is neutral in FY 16. Much of the narrative on the difference between last year's FY 15 proposal and this year's FY 15 proposal is echoed in our FY 16 analysis. This year's FY 16 proposal is significantly different from last year's FY 16 proposal, which had suggested that the City would have a $995,000 general fund deficit. Non-home rule sales tax revenues and state income tax revenues are much higher. Amusement taxes should be much higher, due to the opening of the NCG movie theater. With the road infrastructure fee, the City does not have to transfer any money into the city wide capital fund in FY 16. This is the first year of the full rollback of the senior garbage subsidy. Limited hiring throughout all departments results in savings in the police department in officer positions. These savings are offset in increased costs for squad cars and public works vehicles, IT, and special engineering services. With the Game Farm Road program bonded in FY 15, much of the work will be completed and billed in FY 16. The City has budgeted a complete resurfacing of Cannonball Road, between Blackberry Shore Lane and Amanda Lane, offset by federal funding of$300,000. The Route 71 resurfacing project between 47 and Orchard Road is scheduled by IDOT to be completed in FY 16, so we have budgeted accordingly. At first glance, FY 16 appears to have a significant total budget deficit. With the in-flux of bond proceeds for Game Farm Road in FY 15 and the majority of expenditures covered in FY 16, we expect a —$4.6 million reduction in the City's overall fund balance position. Last year's budget proposal had FY 16 at a $1 million budgeted deficit. While this seems better on its face, it should be noted that the FY 16 deficit essentially wipes out the previous year's surplus as bond proceeds are used to finance the Game 4 Farm Road project. Without the Game Farm Road expenses, the City's overall fund balance position decreases by$800,000. Year-by-year summary, FY 17 and FY 18 projections We stated last year that any budget proposal beyond 3 years in the future is highly speculative and variable. Nonetheless,we put forth the following proposals for FY 17 and FY 18. We expect that each of FY 17 and FY 18 will result in a general fund deficit; $1,454,000 and $560,000 respectively. In both of these years, the citywide capital fund requires a significant increase in transfers to complete all capital projects planned. Further, the City is projected to start paying on the Game Farm Road bond in FY 17 and has some increased debt service payments in FY 17 and FY 18. These increased debt service payments also correspond with a continued rollback of non-abated property taxes in FY 17 and FY 18.. Even if the road infrastructure fee, sewer infrastructure fee, and water infrastructure fee is left in place through FY 18, the City still expects to see total budgetary deficits in FY 17 and FY 18. The narratives on the difference in last year's FY 16 proposal and this year's FY 16 proposal are substantially similar to the FY 17 proposals. In FY 17,the City will complete the Cannonball LAFO project, started in FY 16. The Game Farm Road project will wrap up in FY 17, and the Kennedy Road bike trail will finish in FY 18. We have also budgeted for the recently awarded ITEP Downtown Aesthetics grant, expected to be completed in FY 17 and FY 18, with reimbursement received in FY 18. Overall budgetary deficits in FY 17 and FY 18 are set to be negative at $1.9 million and $865,000 respectively. At the end of FY 17, the City is currently projecting to be in sight of significant financial problems, caused by ballooning bond payments just past our five-year budget outlook. As we stated last year, we have projected revenues and expenses very conservatively in the prior years—so our hope is that as each fiscal year is completed our projections turn out to be better than we expected. If not, we are forecasting the problems five years in advance. Items to note—M2 picture Before we get into the detail of the various items to note throughout the budget, I would like to reiterate that many of our largest budget issues from past years have been satisfied in this proposal: a fund balance above 15% for all operational funds throughout FY 17, a relatively stable cash position, full funding of major capital projects including Game Farm Road, River Road Bridge, the ITEP Downtown Aesthetics grant, full funding of the new"Road to Better Roads"program, a planned reduction in overall City property taxes through FY 18, a planned drawdown of non-abated property taxes through FY 18, and plan to improve the City's bond rating. While these notes are highlighted throughout this budget narrative, I wanted to remind everyone of those points prior to discussing the following lesser items of note. Items to note—reduction in property taxes In accordance with the City's previously planned drawdown of non-abated property taxes (attached on page 121), we offer the following: 1) We propose no change to the past policy decision that the City's general fund property taxes be increased 1-2% each year depending on consumer price index(CPI) amounts and new construction, under tax cap rules. 5 2) The City's non-abated property taxes will continue to be rolled back each year, although we are proposing a slightly different schedule that adds one year to the planned rollback. 3) Combining item#1 and#2 above, the City's overall property taxes are expected to go down every year through FY 18, subject to yearly review and approval by the City Council: a. New plan: i. 2.9%reduction in FY 14 (levy ordinances already approved by City Council) ii. 2%reduction in FY 15 iii. I%reduction in FY 16 iv. I%reduction in FY 17 v. I%reduction in FY 18 b. Old plan: i. 2.6%reduction in FY 14 ii. 2.3%reduction in FY 15 iii. 2.7%reduction in FY 16 iv. 0.4%reduction in FY 17 v. Undetermined increase in FY 18 4) We propose to refinance the Library 2005B Construction Bond, saving residents about $50,000 per year in debt service payments over the remaining bond term, and resulting in a lower Library property tax bill than expected over the next 11 years. Further details are below. Items to note - City Council goals The City Council passed a list of 16 goals, ranked in order of importance. As stated above, we are proposing to fix only goal one and goal two in this budget proposal: build fund balance and road improvement maintenance program. Two goals tied for third priority police staffing levels and economic development. Unfortunately, police staffing levels are in direct conflict with goal one and goal two. So, we have proposed no additional officers for this budget proposal. However, this will be reevaluated each year based on the performance of the budget. Given that this is the next City Council goal, it would be first in line for a new proposal. Further down the list of goals,we specifically did not address in the budget stricter code enforcement on property maintenance, capital improvement planning, website improvement, sidewalk improvement, home rule referendum, public riverfront improvement, tourism, Metra extension, community outreach, or updating the City Council chamber. Progress can still be made on each item, and funding still remains to accomplish those items—but no new funding proposals were entertained on these items. Items to note—bond ratings and refinancings In late 2012, the City's bond rating was reviewed by Standard& Poor's. We were hoping to receive an upgrade from our current BBB+ general obligation bond rating,but did not. Instead S&P changed our financial outlook from stable to positive, and our management practices from standard to "good". We see that as step in the right direction. However, one of the primary reasons for the lack of upgrade was that the City's cash position in the general fund was poor, and that we were not adhering to our own fund balance policy. Specifically, we showed no cash in the general fund in the FY 12 audit, which means the general fund had a negative cash position at the end of FY 12. As we've discussed in 6 prior budget and audit discussions, the sewer and water funds have been propping up the general fund operations for the past few fiscal years. These funds are stable due to the imposition of the water infrastructure fee,bond refinancing (supported by the implementation of the non-home rule sales tax) and the non-abatement of property taxes relating to certain debt service issues. Concurrent with S&P's review of our bond rating, the City's financial advisor was targeting a Library construction bond refinancing in 2013 that would save the residents a projected amount of $720,000 over the remaining life of the bond. When the bond upgrade did not materialize, that projected savings was reduced by $150,000. This underscores the importance of budgeting for positive outcomes—if we had a slightly better bond rating,we could have capitalized by saving even more money through refinancing. The importance of immediate financial improvement is further highlighted given the current bond market and its historic-low interest rates—we may not be able to achieve as good of interest rates in a few years, even with a better bond rating. In this budget proposal, we do recommend refinancing of the Library 2005B construction bond to capture the projected net present value savings of$480,000 savings over the life of the bond. This will result in a direct property tax reduction to the residents under the Library property tax when compared to the current debt service schedule, and will result in an overall City property tax reduction over the next five fiscal years. Items to note—water infrastructure fee, sewer infrastructure fee, and utility bill based road infrastructure fee As discussed in the last budget proposal, the end of the Rob Roy sewer connection fee payments by Pulte/Centex in the Bristol Bay development occurs in FY 13. This results in a $600,000 hole in revenues in the sewer fund, which is not sustainable. We had projected that an $8.25 per month per user sewer infrastructure fee would need to be implemented on May 1, 2013 to offset this loss in revenue. Unfortunately, these revenues are still needed,but we are proposing they be placed into different funds. For the reasons stated above in the bond rating and refinancing items to note section, the City has a strong ratio of fund balance to expenses in the sewer and water funds, but does not have adequate fund balance in the general fund to support all of the planned capital projects out of the city wide capital fund. This problem could be potentially remedied if the City could legally and permanently transfer funds from the sewer and water funds to the general fund—however, such a transfer would violate a number of City ordinances and budgeting principles. Thus, the problem remains: how do we balance out the relative wealth of the water and sewer funds with the need to fund multiple capital projects in the general fund? In short, we propose to reduce the water infrastructure fee, implement a sewer infrastructure fee in an amount much lower than originally proposed, and implement a utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee, for a total amount that is cheaper than last year's sewer and water infrastructure fee proposal. Specifically, we first propose to nominally drawdown fund balance equivalency in the water fund over time by reducing the water infrastructure fee from $8.25 per month per user to $4 per month per user. This halved fee, results in minimal water fund deficits over the next five fiscal years, leaving the water fund with a 47% fund balance in FY 18, when debt service payments will balloon. Second, we propose to implement the previously discussed sewer infrastructure fee,but at a reduced rate. Last year, we proposed an $8.25 per month per user sewer infrastructure fee to offset the 7 loss of the Rob Roy sewer connection fees. This year, we propose a $4 per month per user sewer infrastructure fee. This lower-than-planned fee results in moderate annual sewer fund deficits over the next five fiscal years, leaving the sewer fund with a projected 51% fund balance at the end of FY 18. However, unlike the water fund,most bonds in the sewer fund will be expired or soon to expire in FY 18,with no balloon payments. Finally, we propose to implement a utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee at $8 per month per user. The road infrastructure fee would show up on the utility bill as a line-item fee, and would be paid in the exact same manner as the water infrastructure fees and sewer infrastructure fees The proposed road infrastructure fee is our name for what the state statutes allow as a"vehicle tax", which is the state statute used to implement vehicle stickers. Unlike most municipal vehicle stickers,we would propose a flat fee for each household with no actual sticker. The road infrastructure fee ordinance would be drafted with the assumption that each household has at least one vehicle, and that each household should pay for a share of road improvements equally. If a household had no vehicles registered to its address, they could have the fee removed if the property owner or tenant came to City Hall and signed a form verifying they have no vehicles registered at the subject address. The police department would then be able to perform a compliance check of the address via database. This assumption of vehicle ownership gets rid of the cumbersome process of purchasing the vehicle sticker and the administrative problems of sticker checks by the Police Department. Further, the City saves money on reminder mailings, the cost of the physical sticker, and the staff time associated with processing several thousand sticker payments. All of the money generated by the road infrastructure fee would be directly deposited into the City wide capital fund to fund ongoing capital projects, including the Road to Better Roads program. While I acknowledge how severely unpopular a road infrastructure fee will be, I offer the following: 1) Without the fee, the City is not going to be able to fund the Road to Better Roads program, which is currently being proposed at only half the recommended level by our engineers. The money we do not spend on road improvements this year, becomes multiplied over the next several years. 2) The aggregate totals of the water infrastructure fee, sewer infrastructure fee and road infrastructure fee will be $16 per month per user. In last year's budget proposal, the water infrastructure fee and proposed sewer infrastructure fee totaled$16.50 per month per user. So the new proposal is slightly cheaper for residents, allows us to complete capital projects, and allows money to flow into the general fund, where the end result could be a bond rating upgrade, further refinancing, and more savings. 3) The City was able to reduce per home garbage costs by $4 per month last year, and electricity costs by an average of$30 per month per user. While the imposition of the sewer infrastructure fee and road infrastructure fee is an uptick from last year, we have managed to cut costs for residents by over$27 per month in the past year. Items to note—raises and health insurance contributions 8 This budget proposal contains a 2% net increase in salaries for FY 14 and no planned raises beyond FY 14. The FY 14 raises are 2% net because we are proposing to increase the percentages employees pay into their health insurance but offset that change in contribution percentage with a supplemental salary increase. The specific proposal involves giving all employees who currently participate in the City's insurance program a—4-5% gross salary increase, but increasing their health insurance contribution percentages to 12% for HMO and 15% for PPO plans. The specific administration of the gross raises would involve an analysis of the difference between what they paid last year and what they would have paid last year under the same plan with the new contribution rate. The employee would then be given that exact amount as a gross pay increase. So,the employees will still be paying for any year-over-year increase in health insurance costs, and will still cover any increased costs should they change health insurance plans. For example: Employee A makes $50,000 per year and has the HMO single plan. With a 2%raise, the employee makes $51,000. In 2012, the employee pays 8.5% for HMO single, or$471 per year. The move to a 12%HMO contribution would mean the employee would pay $665 per year, or an increase of$194 per year. So, for this employee the City would make the annual salary increase an extra $194, for a total salary of$51,194. Employee B makes $25,000 per year and has the PPO family plan. With a 2%raise, the employee makes $25,500. In 2012, the employee pays 9% for PPO family, or$1,980 per year. The move to a 15%PPO contribution would mean the employee would pay $3,299 per year, or an increase of$1,319 per year. So, for this employee the City would make the annual salary increase an extra$1,319, for a total salary of$26,819. This move to a higher contribution allows the City to save money over the long-term when employees leave and positions are refilled, or when new positions are created and hired. Further, the employees would see no immediate out-of-pocket costs. Finally, this is being proposed to move benefits more towards our public sector and private sector comparables. Items to note—fund closures As recommended by the City's auditors, we have closed the municipal building impact fee fund. This is completed by transferring $573,000 from the City's general fund to the municipal building impact fee fund. This transfer amount zeroes out the ongoing fund deficit, which allows us to close it. A similar process is completed for the REC Center fund. Since the City is leaving the REC Center, the fund must be closed. So, we have transferred $556,000 into the REC Center fund in FY 14. This amount will fluctuate based on actual revenue losses sustained and any repairs to the building completed by the City. Items to note—cuts in services With the goal of the City Council to get to 15% fund balance over each year of the budget proposal, certain service cuts are recommended in the budget. In addition to economic considerations, each service cut recommendation is coupled with a fairness argument. 9 Leaf pickup is recommended to be cut because the majority of residents do not use the service, and Advanced Disposal provides a substantially similar service for free. Kendall Area Transit is recommended to be cut because only a few hundred residents from the City utilize the service each year, yet the service costs the City $23,000. In 2012, 106 Yorkville residents were registered with KAT. In 2011 and parts of 2010, 312 Yorkville residents were registered. Throughout all of 2012, 3,533 unique rides were given in Yorkville (just under 300 per month average). Finally, as this is a County-wide service, we feel that the most equitable form of funding this service would be for the entire County to equally fund this, and not the current funding format where Yorkville residents are paying as a County resident and as a City resident. The senior garbage subsidy is recommended to be rolled back over two fiscal years and completely eliminated in FY 16. Items to note—minor things that didn't get funded Albeit minor,we did not propose funding for participation in the annual conference of the International Council of Shopping Centers this May. The cost of attendance would likely be less than $5,000 but we did not feel it should be funded given the other service cuts proposed. Similarly, we did not fund general City Hall office renovations. The cost of renovations (new furniture,paint, minor repairs) would likely be less than $10,000. Items to note—engineering department cost anal We have been reviewing engineering department costs since choosing to outsource in 2011. In summary, EEI is between $125,000 and $285,000 cheaper per year for the City than in-house staff. That calculation is based upon: 1) In FY 10, our engineering department had 5 employees and the cost of the department was about$535,000. 2) In FY 11, our engineering department had 3.5 employees and the cost of the department was about$400,000. 3) Our analysis of EEI's services has been that they cost the City about $250,000 to $275,000 per year in fees that we could have done in house. 4) In my opinion, there is more engineering work in FY 13 than there was in FY 10 or FY 11. On a related note, EEI is billing out about $100,000 per year to developers for work related to inspections and punch-lists (which the City would have billed the developers for, even with in-house staff), and an additional $100,000 or so in work billed to the City for special projects (drainage studies we couldn't have done in-house, Route 47 construction review and inspections, River Road Bridge construction management, Safe Routes to School planning, and Old Jail parking lot design). Items to note—cost of services While the City budget contains a relatively clear view of how much it costs to run particular services, it is often less clear how much each resident or home actually pays towards those services. When viewed in the context of how much each resident is paying to participate in a service, the cost efficiencies of a municipal government become more apparent. We have taken a handful of specific and general City services and projects, and broken them out on a basis of two different methodologies. 10 The first methodology looks at each property tax bill and how much of that property tax bill goes to pay for a specific service. This methodology is executed by assuming 17.5% of every dollar spent by the City for general services comes from property taxes. For example, when mosquito control costs the City $8,000, we assume that $1,397 is paid for by property taxes, and the remainder of the cost is borne by sales taxes, income taxes, and all other revenue sources. The City levies about $2.28 million in total operational property taxes, meaning that 0.06% of all City property taxes go towards mosquito abatement services. Utilizing this percentage allows us to calculate the dollar amount each property tax payer is paying towards a particular service. Thus, when a tax payer pays a$753 City property tax bill (based on a $100,000 EAV home), that particular tax payer is paying $0.46 in property taxes for an entire year of mosquito abatement in the City. The second methodology looks at a property owner's shared obligation for the cost of a service, based on the value of their property compared to everyone else's in the City. In short, if you own a home that is worth $100,000 EAV, and there is $445,000,000 in total EAV in the City,you own 0.02% of all land value in Yorkville. Thus, you would be ultimately responsible for 0.02% of every City service. For example, when mosquito control costs $8,000 city wide, we assume that this particular homeowner is responsible for $1.78 of that service annually. For this methodology, we make no determination on how that pro-rata cost is paid; it can be with property taxes, sales taxes, amusement taxes, income taxes, etc. Methodology 1 How much of your Methodology 2 property taxes actually How much of the service are you goes towards this paying for,based on the relative Name of the service Annual Cost of the Service service? value of your home in the City? Mosquito control $ 8,000.00 $ 0.46 $ 1.78 REC Center budget,net operating costs $ 25,000.00 $ 1.44 $ 5.56 Kendall Area Transit $ 30,000.00 $ 1.73 $ 6.67 Training and Conferences,City-wide $ 32,500.00 $ 1.87 $ 7.22 YEDC $ 46,800.00 $ 2.69 $ 10.40 All Information Technology services $ 75,000.00 $ 4.31 $ 16.67 KenCom(FY 15) $ 150,000.00 $ 8.63 $ 33.33 Snow plowing,during an average season $ 241,950.00 $ 13.92 $ 53.77 All legal services $ 247,014.00 $ 14.21 $ 54.89 All engineering expenses $ 280,000.00 $ 16.10 $ 62.22 Game Farm Road,debt service beginning in FY 16 $ 333,719.00 $ 19.19 $ 74.16 REC Center budget,gross operating costs $ 659,467.00 $ 37.93 $ 146.55 Recreation Dept,net operating costs(79 budget) $ 790,464.00 $ 45.47 $ 175.66 Parks Dept,net operating costs $ 807,075.00 $ 46.42 $ 179.35 All Street Dept expenses $ 918,087.00 $ 52.81 $ 204.02 Road to Better Roads $ 1,000,000.00 $ 57.52 $ 222.22 All Police Dept expenses $ 3,970,028.00 $ 228.35 $ 882.23 Hometown Days $ (35,000.00) $ (2.01) $ (7.78) For all of the above items,property taxes may not actually go toward the specific service (i.e. Hometown Days, REC Center), or the service may generate its own revenues (i.e. REC Center and recreation department). Further, each Yorkville resident may pay far less than the amount shown in methodology 2, depending on whether residents buy goods in Yorkville (sales taxes are discretionary, and goods purchased outside of Yorkville go to the municipality where the store is located), have jobs (a portion of state income taxes are remitted to municipalities), and whether you choose to utilize the service (if a resident doesn't use the REC Center, they paid nothing to its budget while it was operating). The purpose of this section is to provide two simple illustrations as to how much a tax payer might pay towards a specific service, as compared to other services. 11 Items of note—vehicle replacement schedule We have proposed replacement of three older squad cars per year, with the intent to get on a 60,000 mile replacement schedule. Based on an analysis completed by City staff last year, the threshold for maintenance costs outweighing new car replacement costs is 60,000 miles. The police department currently has 18 squad cars and 2 motorcycles. Of the 18 squad cars, only 5 cars are less than 60,000 miles. We are proposing to exchange three of the older cars each year for new cars, and to trade in the 5 cars that currently have less than 60,000 miles as they approach 60,000 miles. All of the expenses for the squad cars are located in the newly created vehicle and equipment fund, as they are a capital cost. However, to adequately portray the cost of operations of the police department (and all other departments), we are showing the gap between the cost of the police cars and the available impact fees in the vehicle and equipment fund as a chargeback expense in this line-item. Public Works vehicles do not have such a strict replacement schedule, as they are much more expensive. We have budgeted for a street department truck in FY 14, and one water truck and one sewer truck in FY 15. Items of note—last year's "Things to Watch" Last year, we listed nine things in the budget narrative to watch out for throughout FY 13. Each item is listed below verbatim from the FY 13 budget proposal, along with an update on each item: Comment#1 from FY 13 - Raises In the current proposed budget, no raises are proposed through FY 17. While I hope that this is something we can re-evaluate during budget discussions, it is not something we can plan for until more information is known by the City (see "other things to watch#4"). Police officer and sergeants contracts are up on May 1, 2012, and the Public Works union contract is up on May 1, 2013. In my opinion, I expect staff turnover to increase in FY 13 if raises are not given or on the immediate horizon. a. Update—The City Council authorized 2%raises in FY 13, and we have proposed a 2%net increase across the board for FY 14. We have not proposed any raises for FY 15 and beyond, given the variable nature of the budget and under a firm belief that raises should be evaluated each year. Comment#2 from FY 13 —Vehicle replacement In order minimize long-term costs and vehicle downtime,police cars should be replaced at 60,000 miles. Only 20% of the police vehicles are under 60,000 miles. We are proposing to replace one vehicle per year,which should be an improvement with our current police squad. Also, the Police department is set to purchase two squads this spring. Parks and Public Works vehicles are on a much longer replacement schedule, because they are so expensive to purchase. These vehicles should be driven until they drop—the problem is that the vehicles are dropping. We have a limited budget for replacement vehicles each of the next few years. a. Update—We have proposed an accelerated squad car replacement schedule, at an average pace of 3 police cars per year. We have also budgeted for one public works vehicle in FY 14 and two vehicles in FY 15. 12 Comment#3 from FY 13 —Countryside TIF For Countryside TIF debt, we are expected to be upside down on this bond in FY 18 (no bond proceeds left to pay debt service scheduled through 2024. This poses a significant drain on cash-flow each year from 2013 until 2024. If this bond could be refinanced, or if we could find a developer to generate property tax increment within the TIF district, this would eliminate our FY 18 event horizon and would improve cash-flow. a. Update - The City plans on paying out the remaining bond proceeds in FY 14 to the Countryside/Kendall Crossing developer, and plans to refinance the TIF debt to improve cash-flow in the near term. Comment#4 from FY 13 —Rob Roy Sewer revenue shortfall Centex/Pulte is set to make their final, complete payment of Rob Roy sewer payments in FY 13. This leaves a $600,000 revenue gap in the sewer budget in FY 14. Thus, we are anticipating the need for an $8.25 per month per user sewer infrastructure improvement and maintenance fee, to be implemented on May 1, 2013. a. Update—The City has been forecasting this revenue shortfall for the past two years, under the premise that if the homebuilding economy didn't pick up by FY 14 that we would have to implement an $8.25 per month per user sewer infrastructure fee. For the reasons described above, the City has reduced this fee and implemented a utility bill based road infrastructure fee resulting in a slightly lower overall amount. Comment#5 from FY 13 —ProBuild closure The closure of ProBuild was announced in October 2011, and it is assumed they immediately ceased collecting new orders. Whether existing orders were paid after that timeframe is unknown. We do know that ProBuild did not exist in the building after mid- December. This means that the sales tax report received from the City in April 2012 (for January consumer purchases) will be the first sales tax report without ProBuild's sales. We have estimated a net loss of$175,000 in sales taxes from FY 12 to FY 13 as a result of this closure. a. Update - The estimated drop in sales tax of$175,000 did not appear in FY 13,but we projected a $125,000 decrease from FY 12 to FY 13. Comment#6 from FY 13 —BUILD pro.gram Will the BUILD incentive program work? Only time will tell. The early response to the program has been strong. We had originally estimated 35 building permits in FY 13, and assuming the BUILD program works and is used in its entirety, we should see a total building permit figure for FY 13 of 65 (35 without the incentive, an additional 30 because of the incentive). If for some reason this generates a larger impact,we could be looking at more building permit and development fees, water connection fees, sewer connection fees, and other impact fees. a. Update—The BUILD program was considered by the City Council to be successful and the program was extended to June 30, 2013 or an additional 30 permits, whichever comes first. As of February 5, 2013, forty-five (45) BUILD permit applications have been filed. Comment#7 from FY 13 —Revenue estimates We have been very conservative with our revenue estimates: no growth for some revenues, decreases for others, 1% and 2% increases for others. If the national and local economy ever picks up, it would not be unreasonable to see (and plan for) double digit 13 percentage increases in various revenues. If we notice major upticks in certain revenues (sales taxes, utility taxes, income taxes), we could be seeing signs of sustained economic growth. a. Update—Most revenues have beat our budget estimates, which is a product of our conservative budgeting principles. We have not seen a major uptick in any of the revenues, except for the state income tax. Comment#8 from FY 13 —March budget information Within a span of 4 weeks in mid-March through mid-April,we will receive four significant budget updates that will make some of our"unknowns" change to "knowns". These four groups of items have the ability to make or break our budget in years to come. They are: • Health insurance costs in mid-March at Administration Committee (variation in estimates could be a swing of$100,000 to $200,000 to the positive or negative) • April sales tax reports in the first two weeks of April, for purposes of seeing the impact of the ProBuild closure (could be a swing of$200,000 to the positive or negative) • April non-home rule sales tax reports in the first two weeks of April, for purposes of seeing non-home rule sales tax figures • The FY 12 actuals will be much more concrete. We are currently projecting a general fund surplus of$907,000. a. Update—Health insurance costs came in less than expected. Sales tax reports for FY 12 came in better than expected, but have dipped in FY 13. The FYE 12 general fund surplus ended up at $1.54 million. Comment# 9 from FY 13 —Engineering Inspection costs in subdivisions When a final plat is approved for residential development, the developer has the choice to pay 1.75% of an engineer's estimate of probable construction costs to cover all future infrastructure inspections up through final acceptance by the City. As a result, the City has collected large fees from residential developers in the past for work that has yet to be completed. As developers complete subdivisions (i.e. Bristol Bay and Grande Reserve), these inspections will have to be covered by the City(whether in-house staff or consultant engineers). Depending on the frequency of the buildout of the units and the size of each unit, there could be $10,000 to $20,000 expenses throughout the year(normal units may only take $2,000 to $3,000 for each round of inspections). The good news is that there are very few developments that are actively completing infrastructure, so our costs should be manageable over the next few years for this service. The bad news is that we don't have developers actively completing infrastructure (which would indicate a revived housing market). This is an issue to monitor in the future, which should be worked into our annual outsourced engineering budget. An absolute worst case scenario would require us to hire in-house engineering techs to complete subdivision inspections. a. Update - So far the budget has been in line with our estimates and we did not have to hire in-house engineering techs. One upside to the amount of subdivision issues the City has had is that I expect we will be renegotiating annexation agreements for almost every subdivision over the next few years. This gives us an opportunity to negotiate this liability away. Items of note—Last Year's "Future Obligations" Last year's budget narrative contained a list of 19 future obligations for the City, with a brief description and cost estimate of each. Almost none of those obligations were proposed within the five- year budget. This year,we have proposed funding for a few of them. 14 1) Funding of ongoing road maintenance a. Last year's narrative - In 2011, our former City Engineer threw together a grab number for yearly road maintenance simply based on an estimate of the cost to replace one mile of road, our total number of miles of roads in the City, and assuming that each road has to be replaced every 25 years; that figure was in excess of$2 million per year. Obviously, the point of the pavement management study is to figure out how to stretch out the useful life of all the roads, and over time, decrease your annual road maintenance costs. Ongoing road maintenance costs are budgeted each year at $300,000—which is our expected amount of excess non-home-rule sales tax funds b. Last year's cost estimate - $1,000,000 to $1,700,000 per year c. Update—The City's road improvement study recommended an annual program of $2 million to keep the City's road system from deteriorating. This budget proposal contains a $1 million per year for road improvements, contingent upon the creation of the utility bill based road infrastructure fee. 2) Sycamore Road and Route 34 traffic signal a. Last year's narrative - A temporary signal has been installed at this intersection since 2008. Original agreement with IDOT said that a permanent signal was supposed to be installed by 2010. Agreement was extended through 2013, at the request of the City. Permanent intersection improvements, when constructed will be three sides (two on Route 34, one on Sycamore Road). If the Sexton property (to the north) ever develops, that landowner will have to completely redo the intersection improvements to accommodate a fourth leg. Each year the temporary improvement agreement remains in place, we are responsible for 100% maintenance of the signal. Since the signal is temporary, it is not in good condition four years later, and is expensive to maintain each year($10,000). There is a chance that IDOT would force us to either put in the permanent intersection improvements or take down the temporary. More than 21,000 vehicles per day traverse this intersection on Route 34, and 900 of them use the Sycamore Road leg of the intersection. b. Last year's cost estimate - $200,000 c. Update—The estimate for this intersection improvement is now closer to $250,000. We have not proposed to install this signal within the five year budget, because we expect IDOT to come through and widen Route 34 on the east side of the City in the next five years,which will give us an opportunity to salvage traffic signal equipment from other intersections and install them at Sycamore and Route 34 for minimal cost. Further,we expect the section of Route 34 surrounding this intersection to be widened in the next 10 years. When that occurs, IDOT will pay for 67% of the overall intersection improvements. 3) Beecher Center HVAC a. Last year's narrative - The HVAC unit in the Beecher Center was originally installed in 1980. Its useful life span should have been 15 years. A complete replacement for the existing units is $400,000, because it is under the roof(the roof would have to be rebuilt). Even if individual components of the unit go out, we would not be able to replace them because nobody makes replacement parts 15 for the HVAC unit. One possible thought by staff, should this project become a necessity, is to spend an additional $250,000($750,000 total) and have the HVAC unit installed on the ground near the building, have new ducts run, and update the kitchen in the facility(economies of scale to do the projects all at once). If the HVAC unit were installed on the ground, as opposed to on the roof, we could save the roof replacement costs in the future when the HVAC unit has to be replaced again. The kitchen in the facility is currently out of code, and needs to be upgraded to meet current safety standards. b. Last year's cost estimate - $400,000 or $750,000—whenever the HVAC breaks or we think we should replace it. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 4) Fox Hill water and sewer recapture a. Last year's narrative - In 2003, the City required Fox Hill developers to oversize water and sewer mains out to the Fox Hill subdivision. This original cost for water and sewer oversizing was $807,OOO.In the recapture agreement for these projects, the City agreed to compound interest with final payback by the City due in 2023. If a developer develops in the recapture area prior to 2023, the City has the right to charge the developer their portion of the recapture fee (which then gets forwarded to the Fox Hill developer). b. Last year's cost estimate—At FYE 2012, total amount is $1.538 million. The original principal on this obligation was $807,847, meaning we have racked up $730,252 in interest in 9 years. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 5) West Ridge water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - 100 year old water mains in the area that serve 29 houses directly,many more indirectly. Old water mains tend to be undersized compared to newer water mains, and leak. Both of these cause fire protection to be diminished due to low water pressure. b. Last year's cost estimate - $140,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 6) South Main St water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - 80+year water main in the area near Van Emmon Road and Beecher St. This main services over 30 homes directly, many more indirectly. Fire protection is diminished due to low water pressure. b. Last year's cost estimate - $200,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 7) Elizabeth St water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - 60 year old water main on Elizabeth Street. This main services over 24 homes directly, and many more indirectly. Fire protection is diminished due to low water pressure. 16 b. Last year's cost estimate - $175,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 8) Orange Street water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - Water main replacement near Orange Street and Olsen Street,which will tie to dead end mains together. Connecting two dead ends in a loop will improve fire protection and water quality. b. Last year's cost estimate - $60,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 9) Olsen Street water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - 80+year water main in the area near Orange St. from South Main Street to Mill Street. Fire protection is diminished due to low water pressure. b. Last year's cost estimate - $150,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 10)Washington Street water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - 80+year water main in the area of E Washington Street. Replacement would improve fire protection and flow of water. b. Last year's cost estimate - $150,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 11)Well 7 back-up generator a. Last year's narrative - The only back-up generator in the entire City is at the treatment facility in Grande Reserve. A sustained power outage on the south side of town would result in water shortages on the south side of town. Electric connections and the concrete pad are onsite and waiting for generator installation. b. Last year's cost estimate - $350,000. c. Update—Director Dhuse is working with a local contractor on an agreement which would allow the City to rent a generator in emergencies, with a 12-hour or less delivery time. 12)Game Farm and Somonauk water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - Water main connection of two dead ends in front of Yorkville Grade School. Constructing this project would improve water service for multiple houses on a dead-end main. b. Last year's cost estimate - $65,000. 17 c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 13)SCADA sewer monitoring system a. Last year's narrative - The City has SCADA systems on its water facilities, which allows for remote monitoring and control of industrial facilities. Installing this on our sewer lift stations and pump stations would improve safety and prevent backups. b. Last year's cost estimate - $90,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 14)Sewer system evaluation survey(SSES) a. Last year's narrative - The SSES should be completed for the sewers on the south side of town. SSES has not been conducted since 1996. Completion of the study and eventual construction of the improvements would reduce inflow and infiltration. Reducing inflow and infiltration of storm water into the sanitary sewer system will reduce YBSD's peak flows, which increases their plant capacity,which ultimately delays or eliminates the need to expand their sewer treatment plant. b. Last year's cost estimate - $110,000 to do the study, estimate of$420,000 to complete the improvements after the study is completed. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting this during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 15)Game Farm sewer repairs a. Last year's narrative - There is a short stretch of sewer main in front of Yorkville Grade School, which has individual service lines attached to the main. Changing these individual services to a combined branch would reduce the potential for backups in the future. b. Last year's cost estimate - $50,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 16)River Road sewer replacement a. Last year's narrative - Replace and move a sanitary sewer that is currently under a resident's garage near the Fox River on River Road. If we the sewer breaks before we replace it, we will have to tear down and replace a garage. If we move the sewer before it breaks, we save garage replacement costs in the future. b. Last year's cost estimate - $100,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 17)Bristol Bay intersection improvements a. Last year's narrative - Pursuant to the 2010 annexation agreement amendment with Bristol Bay, the City is responsible for intersection improvements at Route 30 and Route 47, Galena Road and Route 47, and at Bristol Bay Drive and Route 47. The total cost of these three improvements is over$3.3 million. The intersection improvements at Route 47 intersections of Galena Road and Route 30 18 are $1.224 million and $701,000 respectively. The remaining $1.4 million is associated with the additional subdivision entrance and traffic signal at Bristol Bay Drive. b. Last year's cost estimate - $3.329 million in total. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 18)Beecher Center Park a. Last year's narrative - The playground equipment at Beecher Center Park is closely approaching the end of its useful life span. We anticipate the equipment to be removed in FY 13 or FY 14,with no plans to replace it. b. Last year's cost estimate—policy decision c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 19)Kennedy Road bike trail a. Last year's narrative - This is a City Council policy decision. We removed this from an earlier budget proposal, due to the discussion at Public Works Committee. b. Last year's cost estimate - likely $0 net cost,but project itself is $360,000 c. Update—The City Council authorized this project,under the presumption of private funding. So far, the first 4-5 years of expenses have been privately raised ($120,000). From a conservative budgeting perspective, we have left the remainder of the cost at$240,000 as a budgeted expense—in case the private group comes up short. This amount will be reevaluated each year. The small picture—items of note in the general fund Please accept the following information as discussion on individual line-items within the budget. These individual line-items may change between now and the date of approval based on City Council direction or staff recommendation (due to new information). Revenues are listed as "R#", and expenditures are listed as "E#". R1)Property taxes—corporate levy 01-000-40-00-4000 a. We propose that the City corporate levy will continue to grow by the consumer price index, allowable under the tax cap (estimated at I% increases per year), each year through FY 18. This line-item is exclusive of the police pension,bond-related, library operations, and library debt service taxes. As discussed above, the City expects total property taxes for City entities to decrease each year through FY 17. R2)Property taxes—police pension 01-000-40-00-4010 a. The FY 14 amount is expected to meet our actuarial obligations for annual funding. Future years funding amounts are estimates only, and will be analyzed each year by the police pension fund's actuary. R3)Municipal sales tax 01-000-40-00-4030 a. The expected decrease in sales taxes from the ProBuild closure have not materialized to the amount we expected. While sales taxes were down slightly from FY 11 to FY 12 to FY 13, we have seen trends of growth in individual businesses. We are forecasting a 1% growth for FY 14 and FY 15, 2% for FY 16 and FY 17, and 3% for FY 18. 19 R4)Non-home rule sales tax 01-000-40-00-4035 a. We have budgeted for the same growth trends in non-home rule sales taxes as for municipal sales taxes. R5)Amusement tax 01-000-40-00-4060 a. This is the 3% tax charged on all amusement devices and tickets within the City. The maximum amount allowable under law for this tax is 5%. The majority of this line-item is generated by Raging Waves, which has a large percentage of out-of-town visitors. R6)Admissions tax 01-000-40-00-4055 a. This is the 5% admissions tax charged at Raging Waves, authorized by their annexation agreement. This amount is remitted to Raging Waves to offset their on-site infrastructure costs. R7)Business District Tax 01-000-40-00-4070—Kendall Marketplace Business District Tax 01-000-40-00-4072—Downtown Business Dist a. Currently, this revenue line-item corresponds with an expenditure line-item of the same amount, as this tax is rebated 100% to the developer of Kendall Marketplace to pay down bonds related to public infrastructure. Although the performance of this line-item has no impact on the overall performance of the budget, it is noteworthy because it is one measurement of the ongoing performance of Kendall Marketplace. Revenues from the recently authorized downtown business district(Imperial Investments properties)will be tracked separately in a new line item shown above. R8)State income tax 01-000-41-00-4100 a. This line-item is based on our population, and estimates of state revenues put forth by the Illinois Municipal League. The most recent estimate from IML was $88 per capita, even though recent numbers indicate the FY 13 year-end number could be near$92 per capita. At $88 per capita, we would expect to see $1.48m. We have budgeted for $1.55m for each year going forward(no increase) on the off-chance that the State decides to divert this revenue stream. The FY 13 amount projected amount is higher than the $88 per capita because the City typically receives a higher amount than the per capita estimates (from back payments, timing of estimate period v. our budgeting period, etc.). R9)Local use tax 01-000-41-00-4105 a. This line-item is based on our population, and estimates of state revenues put forth by the Illinois Municipal League. The most recent estimate from IML was $15.20 per capita or about $257,000 annually. We have assumed marginal in this revenue stream throughout the five year budget proposal. R10) Building permits 01-000-42-00-4210 a. Revenue figures within this line-item will equal the exact cost of the Building Code Official's salary, the Building Department Receptionist's salary, the cost of part-time property maintenance inspectors and outsourced inspections. During the year, once those costs are met, all building permit revenue will be transferred into a capital fund for the use of one-time capital expenses. This prevents us from using one-item revenues for long-term operating costs in the future. The "surplus"building permit revenues are 20 currently denoted in the City wide capital fund budget under line-item 23-000-42-00- 4210. R11) Transfer from municipal building 01-000-49-00-4916 a. Because we transferred money from the general fund to close out the municipal building impact fee fund, the general fund will be repaid with collected municipal building impact fees. As discussed above, the 1999 City Hall construction was the reason for the deficit within the municipal building impact fee fund. E 1)Salaries All departments, multiple#s a. As stated in the big picture narrative,we have budgeted for the cost of a 2%net raise for all employees in FY 14, but nothing in FY 15 and beyond. The line-items reflect an average gross increase of 5%,but that amount is offset by the move to a 15%PPO or 12%HMO health insurance contribution to all employees starting on May 1. E2)Health, life, dental and vision insurance All departments, multiple#s a. We assume a 10% increase in health insurance costs each year through FY 16, and 6% increases in FY 17 and FY 18. E3)Utilities, commodities and contracts All departments, multiple#s a. Graduated increases in gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and simple contractual services are not based on any particular estimate of the details of the line-item, except where specifically noted in this budget section. From a conservative budgeting principle, we are purposefully trying to overestimate costs to hedge on unanticipated price increases on everything from gasoline to office cleaning. E4)Telecommunications All departments, multiple#s a. We have allocated Comcast internet costs evenly between all departments, resulting in moderate increases in most departments. E5)Training and Travel All departments, multiple#s a. The same training and conference levels are proposed as last year. Department heads have been asked to budget for attendance at one national level or state conference per year to keep up to date with the latest trends in management and government. Increases in individual line-items reflect this request of the department heads. E6)Part-time salaries (Administration) 01-110-50-00-5015 a. This line-item contemplates continuation of the NIU MPA internship program through FY 18. Each intern is a two-year commitment, with Mr. Weckbach's internship term carrying through FY 14. E7)Elected Official—Group Health Insurance 01-110-52-00-5223 E8)Elected Official—Group Life Insurance 01-110-52-00-5236 E9)Elected Official—Dental Insurance 01-110-52-00-5237 E10) Elected Official—Vision Insurance 01-110-52-00-5238 a. We have conservatively budgeted through FY 18 by assuming every incumbent elected official would win re-election and would retain health insurance. 21 El 1) Kendall County Paratransit (Administration) 01-110-54-00-5473 a. Due to budget constraints, we are proposing to cut Kendall Area Transit funding as of May 1, 2013. The final invoice for service through April 30, 2013 would be paid for in FY 14, which is why we've budgeted for $15,000. We propose to cut this based on the participation levels of Yorkville residents. In 2012, 106 Yorkville residents were registered with KAT. In 2011 and parts of 2010, 312 Yorkville residents were registered. Throughout all of 2012, 3,533 unique rides were given in Yorkville (just under 300 per month average). Finally, as this is a County-wide service, we feel that the most equitable form of funding this service would be for the entire County to equally fund this, and not the current funding format where Yorkville residents are paying as a County resident and as a City resident. E12) Auditing services (Finance) 01-120-54-00-5414 a. Budgeted amounts for the next four fiscal years reflect the five year contract recently signed with Lauterbach and Amen. E13) Printing and duplicating (Finance) 01-120-54-00-5430 a. Increase in this line-item is due to a reallocation of printing and copying costs between the Administration and Finance departments. E14) Salaries—Police Officers 01-210-50-00-5010 a. As discussed above,no police hires are proposed through FY 18. This will be re- evaluated each year based on police activity data and available funds. Yorkville currently averages —1.5 officers per 1,000 residents, which is below the regional target of 1.8 officers per 1,000 resident, but is within the regional average: i. Aurora— 1.66 per 1,000 residents ii. Batavia— 1.44 iii. Carpentersville - 1.97 iv. East Dundee - 3.59 v. Elburn - 1.5 vi. Elgin- 1.67 vii. Geneva- 1.63 viii. Gilberts - 1.29 ix. Hampshire - 1.93 x. Montgomery - 1.36 xi. North Aurora— 2.02 xii. Sleepy Hollow- 1.88 xiii. South Elgin- 1.45 xiv. St Charles - 1.61 xv. Sugar Grove - 1.54 xvi. West Chicago - 1.81 xvii. West Dundee - 2.37 xviii. Winfield- 2.02 E15) Part-time Salaries (Police) 01-210-50-00-5015 a. As discussed in the FY 13 budget narrative,this line-item allows for some flexibility for the Police Chief in staffing between part-time officers, community service officers, and cadets. 22 E16) Vehicle &Equipment chargeback(Police) 01-210-54-00-5422 a. As discussed above,we are proposing an accelerated replacement of squad cars with the intent to get on a 60,000 mile replacement schedule. All of the expenses for the squad cars are located in the newly created vehicle and equipment fund, as they are a capital cost. However, to adequately portray the cost of operations of the police department(and all other departments), we are showing the gap between the cost of the police cars and the available impact fees in the vehicle and equipment fund as a chargeback expense in this line-item. E17) Part-time salaries (Com. Dev.) 01-220-50-00-5015 a. The FY 14 budget amount will cover two part-time code enforcement officers at $15 per hour for 1,000 hours per year. For FY 13,we found great success in managing mowing inspections with one part-time code enforcement officer. E18) Inspections (Com. Dev.) 01-220-54-00-5459 a. With the current expertise of the Code Official, we do not plan on needing any outsourced inspections in FY 14 and beyond. However, we budgeted for$10,000 per year in case inspections pick up dramatically and to cover scheduling conflicts. E19) Economic Development(Com. Dev.) 01-220-54-00-5486 a. The City established funding to the YEDC around 2000, and the amount hasn't changed since. The City's current commitment to the YEDC expires in FY 13. Given the recent and historical success in attracting businesses,we are proposing a three year commitment to the YEDC with an inflation component to our commitment. E20) Salaries &Wages (Streets) 01-410-50-00-5010 a. The increase in FY 14 is caused by a reallocation of Director Muse's salary. In prior years, his salary was allocated equally between the Water and Sewer Departments (nothing out of Streets). We feel that it is most equitable for his salary to be split between Water, Sewer, and Streets equally. E21) Vehicle & Equipment Chargeback(Streets) 01-410-54-00-5422 a. The explanation for this line-item is the same as the parallel line-item in the Police Department. E22) Sidewalk program(Streets) 01-410-54-00-5454 a. Per a discussion at the Public Works Committee,we have proposed suspending the 50150 program(housed out of this line-item) due to non-participation and replace it with a proactive sidewalk replacement program(100% City-funded). This new program is housed in the city wide capital fund. E23) Garbage services—senior subsidy 01-540-54-00-5441 a. For budgetary reasons, we propose to eliminate the senior discount on garbage services by FY 16. This would be accomplished through a graduated elimination of the discount over FY 14 and FY 15. Specifically, we propose to charge seniors 33% of the price of garbage in FY 14, 66% in FY 15, and 100% in FY 16. Approximately 650 households take advantage of the senior discount on garbage services. 23 E24) Leaf pickup 01-540-54-00-5443 a. For budgetary and duplication of services reasons, we propose to eliminate City leaf pickup in FY 14. Free bagged leaf pickup is available through Advanced Disposal through the end of November every year as part of the current Advanced Disposal contract(through FY 17). City leaf pickup takes the majority of the streets, sewer and water department employees' time for two weeks in November. As part of the cancellation of this service, the City would be able to sell $15,000 worth of equipment (leaf vacuum). Brush pickup is proposed to remain. E25) Amusement tax rebate (Admin. Services) 01-640-54-00-5439 a. As part of the Countryside redevelopment project incentives, the City is refunding a portion of the amusement tax to developer. E26) KenCom(Admin. Services) 01-640-54-00-5449 a. The City's contribution to KenCom begins in FY 15. Based on our estimate of a 10% annual increase in KenCom's budget, our contribution will be around$150,000 in FY 15. For every $1 increase in KenCom's budget, the City absorbs an additional $0.17,based on last year's call volume proportions between agencies. As a point of reference, the recent KenCom lease and buildout contributions to the Kendall County board increased the City's estimated FY 15 contribution by $34,000. E27) Information Tech. Services (Admin Svcs) 01-640-54-00-5450 a. This line-item covers all consultant costs and equipment purchases for IT in all departments. We are still recommended outsource of IT services, as consultant costs currently make up only$30,000 of the entire line-item. E28) Special engineering services 01-640-54-00-5453 a. This line-item will contain engineering services invoices for projects which the City would not be able to complete with in-house staff. This line-item helps us to analyze the in-house v. outsource engineering debate . E29) Engineering services 01-640-54-00-5465 a. This line-item covers all normal, outsourced engineering costs per our contract with EEI. We contemplate outsourcing engineering functions through FY 18. E30) Contingencies 01-640-70-00-7799 a. The $50,000 budgeted in each of the next five fiscal years represents less than 1% of the yearly expenditures in the general fund. City policy states this line-item should be 3%to 5% of yearly expenditures in the general fund. We have not funded this line-item to that percentage in several years, and even the $50,000 is greater than the amount budgeted and spent in the past few fiscal years. E31) Transfer to Municipal Building 01-640-99-00-9916 a. Per the discussion above and the recommendations from our auditors, we are transferring money into the municipal building impact fee fund to offset the ongoing fund deficit. This will allow us to close the municipal building impact fee fund. Because the original source of the deficit in that fund was due to the construction and renovation of the current 24 City Hall, all municipal building impact fees will now be deposited into the city wide capital fund before being transferred to the general fund to offset the general fund's payment to close out the municipal building impact fee fund. E32) Transfer to Sewer 01-640-99-00-9952 a. This amount offsets the 2011 Rob Roy Sewer refinancing bond payments due each year, and is sourced from non-home rule sales tax proceeds. E33) Transfer to Parks &Recreation 01-640-99-00-9979 a. The increase in the FY 14 transfer amount is due to the closure of the REC Center fund, which we've folded into the Parks and Recreation fund(79) for this year. The small picture—other funds Fox Hill SSA R1)Property Taxes—Fox Hill SSA 11-000-40-00-4011 a. We are proposing increases in the annual HOA dues,beginning in FY 15, due to one- time projects (outlined below) and establishment of a 100% fund balance for this fund. Current budget proposal shows an increase in annual dues from $17 per year to $38 per year. E 1)Trail maintenance 11-111-54-00-5417 a. The interior trails of the subdivision need to be sealcoated in FY 15 and FY 16. We propose to fund half of the work with the fund balance in the Fox Hill SSA fund (currently $15,000) and have the other half paid for by the residents of the subdivision over an 8-year period. The proposal would require the City to deficit fund the second half of the work and increase the HOA dues to $38 per year(up from$17), starting in FY 15. The HOA dues would be reanalyzed after the fund balance reaches 100% of normal annual maintenance costs (expected to be 2022). E2)Outside Repair and Maintenance 11-111-54-00-5495 a. This line-item is for annual ongoing maintenance expenses related to trail patching, entrance sign repainting, entrance area landscaping, and tree trimming all common areas. Sunflower Estates SSA R1)Property Taxes— Sunflower SSA 12-000-40-00-4012 a. We are proposing increases in the annual HOA dues,beginning in FY 15, due to one- time projects (outlined below) and establishment of a 100% fund balance for this fund. Current budget proposal shows an increase in annual dues from $64 per year to $150 per year. E1)Pond maintenance 12-112-54-00-5416 a. The City authorized a detailed inspection of the three detention basins in Sunflower Estates in October 2012. Two basins were given an"F" grade and the third basin a"C" grade. Based on our analysis, all three ponds need to be fixed in order to maintain adequate detention basin storage. One option is to dredge the ponds at a cost of 25 $110,000. For half the price, we can naturalize all three basins. We recommend naturalizing the basins due to cost considerations. Naturalizing the basins will also improve the immediate environment (naturalization prevents mosquito populations and cleans stormwater). If the City chooses to dredge the ponds, the HOA fees would have to be $250 annually. Similar to the Fox Hill proposal, we propose to fund the basin naturalization through exhausting the fund balance in the Sunflower SSA fund, and then deficit funding the remaining $45,000 worth of work. The deficit would be repaid over a 10-year period, with a reanalysis of the HOA dues expected in 2025. E2)Outside Repair and Maintenance 12-112-54-00-5495 a. This line-item is for annual ongoing maintenance expenses related to entrance sign repainting, tree trimming and landscape planting replacement. Motor Fuel Tax Fund R1)State Grants 15-000-41-00-4170 a. This line-item contains the reimbursement from the state for the downtown parking lot construction. We expect to complete the project in calendar year 2013, with reimbursement coming in FY 14. We moved the reimbursement amount to this line-item (and away from the "Reimb-Old Jail parking lot" line-item) to mimic similar line-items in other funds. R2)Illinois Jobs Now Proceeds 15-000-41-00-4172 a. The City received a third of five supplemental MFT disbursements in FY 13. Under prior announcements from the Governor, we should get two additional disbursements of $73,000 over the next two fiscal years. However, the fourth disbursement from the State has not been announced yet and past correspondence with high level state officials has cast doubt on the future disbursements. Thus, we removed the disbursements from last year's budget, and we propose the same for FY 14. If new disbursements are announced, we will add them into the budget. El)Patching 15-155-56-00-5632 a. This line-item represents our annual MFT patching project. Last year, we patched Kennedy Road and the year before that was Game Farm Road. We propose to continue this summer-fall RFP process as part of our new"Road to Better Roads"program. The recommended road each year will be chosen by staff, based on the data given to us in the pavement management program software. As discussed in the big picture narrative, our recommended target for the next 5 years is to spend$1 million per year on road improvements and preventative maintenance. E2)Road to Better Roads Program 15-155-60-00-6025 a. This line-item represents the MFT portion of the Road to Better Roads Program. The funding amounts recommended within the MFT budget are selected to draw down the MFT fund balance to zero by FY 18. E3)Game Farm Road Project 15-155-60-00-6073 a. This line-item covers easement and property acquisition for the Game Farm Road project. The remainder of the Game Farm Road project expenses are in the city wide capital fund. 26 E4)Route 47 expansion 15-155-60-00-6079 a. Per the City's intergovernmental agreement with IDOT, MFT related Route 47 project expenses will be spread over the next ten fiscal years. The amount budgeted in this line- item represents the actual project expenses, as currently approved by IDOT. E5)Cannonball LAFO project 15-155-60-00-6089 a. This line-item represents a mill and overlay of Cannonball Trail from Amanda Lane to Blackberry Shore Lane, at a total cost of$435,000. The City received $300,000 in Federal STP funds for this project, which will commence in 2015. City wide Capital R1)State Grants—ITEP 23-000-41-00-4178 a. This line-item shows the revenue to be received from the state for the Kennedy Road bike path project. For budget purposes, we have shown a net cost to the City of $245,000 for the project, even though private fund raising should cover that entire amount and we have the opportunity to apply for the second federal grant after Phase I and II engineering are complete to halve the construction cost of the project. R2)Building Permits 23-000-42-00-4210 a. This line-item represents the building permit revenue above and beyond the costs associated with the building department employees. We are using this incremental revenue to help fund one-time capital projects in this fund. R3)Development Fees—CW Capital 23-000-42-00-4214 a. All development fees received are coded into this line-item and used on one-time capital expenses. The City used to code these revenues to the general fund and use them to offset general operations cost. When these revenues tanked, the general fund was left with a large structural deficit. R4)Development Fees—Municipal Building 23-000-42-00-4218 a. As stated in the budget narrative,we closed out the municipal building impact fee fund by transferring almost $600,000 to this fund to offset its deficit from the construction of City Hall in 1999. Going forward, these impact fees will be coded into the City wide capital fund. R5)Bond proceeds 23-000-49-00-4900 a. This line-item represents the revenues from bond proceeds for the Game Farm Road project, set to begin in earnest in FY 16. R6)Loan proceeds 23-000-49-00-4905 a. This line-item represents the Kendall County payment of the River Road Bridge project invoices. E1)Engineering Services 23-230-54-00-5465 a. This line-item represents subdivision/infrastructure inspections that the City is obligated to perform as part of a development agreement, or because a developer has paid the 27 engineering inspection fee at time of final plat. This is the line-item to watch in the ongoing analysis of in-house v. outsourced engineering department. If this line-item becomes too large ($200,000+) it will likely be advantageous to have an in-house engineering department. We do not think that will occur in the next 5 years, however. E2)Road resurfacing 23-230-60-00-6015 a. This line-item represents the second half of the Road to Better Roads funding. Between this line-item and the line-item in the MFT budget, we have $1 million in funding projected. E3)Sidewalk construction 23-230-60-00-6041 a. As stated in the Streets Department narrative, we are proposing to cease the 50150 sidewalk program due to non-use, and replace it with a City initiated sidewalk replacement program. Instead of doing small areas throughout the City, we will take a lump sum of funding and replace entire blocks in the City each year. Contrary to how we select roads for rehab, sidewalks will be completed on a worst-first basis, as there is no cost efficiency to be achieved through data collection. E4)Route 71 (Rt 47 to Orchard Rd)project 23-230-60-00-6058 E5)US 34 (Rt 47 to Orchard Rd)project 23-230-60-00-6059 a. The City has approved memorandum of understandings with IDOT for these projects, and there is a good chance both of these projects will be completed within the next five years. E6)Game Farm Road Project 23-230-60-00-6073 a. We expect construction to begin in FY 16, and to finish in FY 17. The expenses shown in the budget are the net cost of the project to the City. The entire project is expected to be around$7 million, and the City will receive around $2.5 million in federal funds. E7)Kennedy Road Bike Trail 23-230-60-00-6094 a. This line-item contains the net expenses from the construction of the trail. We are assuming that the City will pay for $245,000 worth of the project, which assumes that the Push for the Path group raises no future money. Reimbursement monies received from Push for the Path will be recorded in revenue line item 23-000-48-00-4860. E8)Principal Payment (2015 bond) 23-230-81-00-8000 E9)Interest Payment(2015 bond) 23-230-81-00-8050 a. This line-item contains the debt service for a 20-year bond associated with the Game Farm Road project. The high cost of the project and compressed construction schedule does not make this project feasible without bond financing. E10) Princ. pmt. (Kendall Co. Loan, River Rd Br.) 23-230-97-00-8000 a. This line-item represents the City's 6-year payback of River Road Bridge expenses to Kendall County at 0% interest. Vehicle and Equipment Fund R1)Development fees—Police Capital 25-000-42-00-4215 28 R2)Engineering Capital Fee 25-000-42-00-4218 R3)Development fees—PW Capital 25-000-42-00-4219 R4)Development fees—Park Capital 25-000-42-00-4220 a. The above line-items all contain impact fees generated at time of building permit, or upfront payments at time of final plat. We have generally assumed that we will have 65 new housing starts in FY 14. Each of these impact fees have their own corresponding expense line-items departmentalized in this fund, and are tracked through a separate fund balance calculation at the bottom of the fund. As a general reminder, fund consolidation was a recommendation from our auditors. R5)Seized vehicle proceeds 25-000-43-00-4340 a. This line-item contains all revenues the City receives from seized vehicles. For purposes of a fund balance calculation, this money is used by the Police department in their"Police Capital" line-items within this fund, and is tracked as part of the Police capital fund balance. R6)Police Chargeback 25-000-44-00-4420 R7)Public Works Chargeback 25-000-44-00-4421 a. As discussed in the general fund line-item narrative,these line-items represent transfers from the general fund to cover the gap between vehicle purchases and available funds in the respective departments. E1)Vehicles (Police Capital) 25-205-60-00-6070 a. As stated in the general fund narrative, we are proposing to purchase 3 squad cars per year, to maintain a 60,000 mile replacement schedule. To reiterate, once a squad car reaches 60,000 miles it has hit its peak trade-in value to future maintenance cost ratio, and it is most advantageous for us to trade the vehicle in. E2)Principal pmt (PW 185 Wolf Street bldg.) 25-215-92-00-8000 E3)Interest pmt(PW185 Wolf Street bldg.) 25-215-92-00-8050 E4)Principal pmt(Parks 185 Wolf Street bldg.) 25-225-92-00-8000 E5)Interest pmt (Parks 185 Wolf Street bldg.) 25-225-92-00-8050 a. These line-items cover the annual purchase installment payments to the property seller for the Public Works south building. Debt Service Fund R1)Property taxes—2005A Bond 42-000-40-00-4006 a. This line-item represents the non-abated property taxes associated with the in-town road program bond, in the amount and duration approved by City Council as part of the Rob Roy sewer bond refinancing package two years ago. These property taxes are scheduled to be eliminated in FY 18. Water fund R1)Property taxes—2007A Bond 51-000-40-00-4007 a. This line-item represents the non-abated property taxes associated with the 2007A bond, in the amount and duration approved by City Council as part of the Rob Roy sewer bond 29 refinancing package two years ago. These property taxes are scheduled to be eliminated in FY 16. R2)Water Sales 51-000-44-00-4424 a. The current water rate graduated increases expire after FY 14. As part of a separate comprehensive water ordinance revision to be rolled out over the next few months, we will propose a new 5-year water rate schedule. We anticipate that a 1.5% annual increase in the water rate base will be necessary to sustain water operations. R3)Water infrastructure fee 51-000-44-00-4440 a. As discussed in the "items of note" section above, we propose to reduce the current water infrastructure fee from$8.25 per month per user to $4 per month per user. R4)Water connection fees 51-000-44-00-4450 a. For FY 14, we expect 65 new housing starts. Each subdivision has its own water connection fee amount, depending on when the subdivision was annexed. R5)Rental income 51-000-48-00-4820 a. This line-item contains rental and lease fees from various cellular and internet antennae on City water towers. R6)Transfer from Sewer 51-00-49-00-4952 a. This line-item represents the transfer from the Sewer Fund to offset half of the cost of the 2005C bond. E1)Bad debt 51-510-54-00-5499 a. This line-item represents non-payment of utility bills by customers. The City does lien properties and perform service shutoffs on non-payment, but still incurs bad debt until those amounts are paid. This non-payment represents 0.75% of the total amount billed, and is considered very low. E2)Route 47 expansion 51-510-60-00-6079 a. This line-item represents all water related utility costs associated with the Route 47 expansion project. These amounts are scheduled in equal annual payments for 10 years. Sewer Fund R1)Property taxes—2004B Bond 52-000-40-00-4009 a. This line-item represents the non-abated property taxes associated with the 2004B bond, in the amount and duration approved by City Council as part of the Rob Roy sewer bond refinancing package two years ago. These property taxes are scheduled to be eliminated in FY 15. R2)SW Connection Fees—Rob Roy 52-000-44-00-4457 R3)Sewer infrastructure fees 52-000-44-00-4460 a. The final Rob Roy sewer agreement payment from Pulte Homes (Centex)was received in FY 13. As discussed in last year's budget narrative, the City is forced to fill the revenue 30 hole associated with the expiration of this agreement. We propose to do that by a $4 per month per user sewer infrastructure fee. R4)Transfer from General 52-000-49-00-4901 a. This line-item represents the non-home rule sales tax transfers from the general fund, used to offset the 2011 Refinancing Bond. E1)Route 47 expansion 52-520-60-00-6079 a. This line-item represents all sewer related utility costs associated with the Route 47 expansion project. These amounts are scheduled in equal annual payments for 10 years. E2)Lennar—Raintree sewer recapture a. Due to various issues in the subdivision, we propose to hold payment on this recapture payment until further notice. E3)Windett Ridge sewer recapture 52-520-75-00-7501 a. Due to various issues in the subdivision, the City does not expect to make the sewer recapture payment for the next five fiscal years. Land-cash fund R1)RTP Grant—Clark Park 72-000-41-00-4174 a. This grant was awarded to the City in FY 13, and we expect construction and reimbursement to be completed in FY 14. R2)OSLAD Grant—Riverfront Grant 72-000-41-00-4175 a. This grant has not been awarded to the City yet. We made the first cut of grant review, and we are using this line-item as a placeholder for planning purposes in case the grant application is approved. If approved,we would expect to complete the park in FY 16. R3)Transfer from Vehicle & Equipment 72-000-49-00-4925 a. In FY 10, the City Council accepted a cash payout from Lennar in exchange for transfer of certain subdivision improvement obligations to the City. The City has completed most of the infrastructure improvements. The remaining improvements for Raintree Park C are coded in a separate expense line-item in FY 18. E1)Clark Park 72-720-60-00-6044 a. This grant was awarded to the City in FY 13, and we expect construction and reimbursement to be completed in FY 14. E2)Riverfront Park 72-720-60-00-6045 a. This grant has not been awarded to the City yet. We made the first cut of grant review, and we are using this line-item as a placeholder for planning purposes in case the grant application is approved. If approved, we would expect to complete the park in FY16. E3)Grande Reserve Park A 72-720-60-00-6046 E4)Grande Reserve Park B 72-720-60-00-6047 31 a. Grande Reserve Park B must be started by May 2014, and Park A by January 2015, and each must be completed within 2 years of the start of construction,pursuant to OSLAD grant agreements for Riemenschneider Park and Raintree Park B. Parks A and B were used as the local match in both of those OSLAD grant projects. Part of the requirement for use of the deeds as a local match is that they must be improved by a certain date. Parks and Recreation Fund (79) R1)Transfer from General 79-000-49-00-4901 a. The large increase from FY 13 to FY 14 is due primarily to the REC Center closure. Whatever deficit is left at the end of the operation of the REC Center must be closed out by another fund. Because the REC Center was an arm of the Recreation Department, we felt it was easiest to show the initial transfer to cover the REC Center deficit out of the recreation department budget("Transfer to RECREATION CENTER" line-item#79- 795-99-00-9980). Because the Parks and Recreation fund is covering the REC Center ending deficit, and the Parks and Recreation fund receives a general fund transfer, we must make up the hole in this fund with a larger general fund transfer. E1)Outside Repair and Maintenance (Parks) 79-790-54-00-5495 a. The increase in this line-item is due to an aging vehicle fleet. At this time, it is still advantageous for us to pay higher repair costs, rather than replace older vehicles with new vehicles. E2)Salaries &Wages (Recreation) 79-795-50-00-5010 a. This line-item is higher than in FY 13 because are proposing to fold the REC Center facility manager back into the recreation department in a recreation coordinator capacity. Even with this move, the Recreation department will have less employees and less total salary than in FY 07, prior to the REC Center. E3)Outside Repair and Maintenance (Recreation) 79-795-54-00-5495 a. This line-item covers renovations to the Old Post Office and other office buildings to bring them into compliance with ADA standards and recreational uses as a result of moving certain recreation programming out of the REC Center. E4)Property tax payment 79-795-54-00-5497 a. The final half-year property tax payment from the REC Center will be paid in FY 15. E5)Transfer to REC Center 79-795-99-00-9980 a. As stated in the narrative for the "Transfer from General" line-item above,we decided to show the REC Center budget deficit being covered by the Recreation Department because we thought it was the most natural location in the budget. REC Center Fund R1)All revenue line-items Multiple#s a. All revenue line-items contemplate a very conservative revenue total for the final two months of operation (May 2013 and June 2013). 32 E1)A11 expense line-items Multiple#s a. All expense line-items contemplate a full operation the final two months. Countryside TIF R1)Property taxes—Countryside TIF 87-000-40-00-4087 a. This line-item contemplates finish of the theater in 2013, and a full property tax payment in FY 16 (summer 2015 payment). E1)TIF Incentive 87-870-54-00-5425 a. The Kendall Crossing TIF agreement calls for payout of the remainder of the TIF proceeds at time of theater opening. We had originally communicated that amount in early 2012 as around $1.8 million. Due to timing of the construction,the amount is likely to be around$1.2 million. The City committed to a full $2 million incentive, with the gap between TIF proceeds and the $2 million to be made up by an amusement tax rebate to the developer. Because the City is on the hook for the full $2 million, we think it is prudent to paying down that incentive as soon as possible. Therefore, we are recommending to pay out $1.8 million to the developer at the end of 2013 when the theater opens, regardless of how much remains of the TIF proceeds. E2)Principal Payment(2005 Bond) 87-870-80-00-8000 E3)Interest Payment(2005 Bond) 87-870-80-00-8050 a. The 2005 bond ends five years before the expiration of the TIF. Because of the development setbacks on this property caused by the recession, we recommend refinancing this bond to improve cash flow in the near term and allow the property a few more years to fully buildout. E4)Principal Payment (2013 Bond) 87-870-93-00-8000 E5)Interest Payment(2013 Bond) 87-870-93-00-8050 a. With the siting of the movie theater and expected buildout of outlots in the development, we propose refinancing the existing TIF bond to stretch the debt service payments to the end of the TIF district. Currently, the existing TIF bond is set to expire in 2024 and the TIF district expires in 2029. The refinancing would also decrease the yearly annual debt service payment, which will limit the City's difference between property taxes generated for the next few years (currently, almost $0) and the debt service payment. Downtown TIF R1)Property taxes—Downtown TIF 88-000-40-00-4088 a. Property values in the TIF have decreased during the recession, which has taken a hit on our annual TIF revenues. However, the recent construction and renovation in the downtown will manifest itself in the next two fiscal years. All new construction and renovation projects will result in a minimal TIF net revenue amount, as we've committed between 75%to 85% of the annual TIF increment to the developers as incentives. Thus, we have not budgeted for a large increase in property tax revenues—rather,we will wait until they materialize and budget from that point. E1)Project Costs 88-880-60-00-6000 33 a. This line-item is for City-initiated projects within the TIF districts. This can be anything from streetscape aesthetic improvements, to building repairs on public buildings. E2)TIF Incentive Payouts 88-880-54-00-5425 a. This line-item is for the annual TIF payouts to developers with approved TIF agreements. Because we have not increased the TIF property tax revenue line-item, we are not budgeting for the expense either. E3)Route 47 expansion 88-880-60-00-6079 a. This line-item represents various improvements within the TIF district associated with the Route 47 expansion project. These amounts are scheduled in equal annual payments for 10 years. Cash Flow—Surplus (Deficit) This section of the budget continues from last year, and shows the surpluses and deficits for every fund in the entire budget. Through a change in budgeting principles, this section can now be used to see the City's "overall budget"performance. In fact, in this memo we refer to the "total budget" or "overall budget" instead of cash-flow, which was the term we used last year to describe overall budget performance. A few years ago, simply adding up all the funds' revenues and expenses would not have given you an accurate view of whether we were taking in more than we were spending (or vice versa); we can do that now. The total at the bottom of the column for each fiscal year is the basis for whether the City's overall budget is running a surplus or deficit. As stated in the big picture narrative, we are recommending four years of total budget deficit. In FY 14, we are hampered by the payment of Countryside TIF funds, and the closure of the REC Center fund and municipal building impact fee fund. In FY 15, we show a total budget surplus of$3.5 million,but that is buoyed by the in-flux of$4 million in Game Farm Road bond proceeds in the city wide capital fund. In FY 16, we show a total budget deficit of more than $4.6 million, but that is again a result of spending down Game Farm Road bond proceeds (more than $4.3 million in the city wide capital fund). In FY 17 and 18, deficits in the general fund caused by large amounts of capital projects and very conservative revenue projections ultimately drag down the entire budget. As we stated earlier in this memo, these amounts are highly speculative and variable. Cash Flow—Fund Balance This section of the budget is carried over from last year too, and is a parallel section to the "Cash Flow—Surplus (Deficit)" section above. The only difference between that section and this one is that this section adds in the fund balance amounts for each fund at the end of the fiscal year. As we discussed in the big picture narrative, the general fund fund balance is relatively stable over the next five fiscal years, remaining at $1.9 million in FY 18. The water fund fund balance equivalency remains stable, even with the reduction in the water infrastructure fee. The sewer fund fund balance equivalency is drawn down over the next five fiscal years. The total at the bottom of each column represents the City's overall aggregate fund balance. As we stated above and in last year's budget narrative, $3 million is the threshold for severe fiscal problems. We estimate to be just below $4 million in FY 18. 34 Cash Flow—Actual Cash on Hand at FYE This is a new section, which shows actual cash balances at FYE 11-12 and our best estimate of cash on hand as of April 30 of each projected fiscal year, based on the budget proposal. If our estimates were 100% correct(they will not be), these figures would show up in the statement of net assets in the City's audited financial statements. Allocated Items—Aggregated This section carries forward from last year, and contains aggregate costs from all departments, including liability insurance, employee health, dental and vision insurance,property taxes, non-abated property taxes, building permit revenue, employee salaries, Route 47 construction costs, etc. 35 United City of Yorkville Revenues by Category Fiscal Year 2014 Other Inter- Licenses& Fines& Charges Investment Reimb- Miscel- Land Financing Fund FUND Taxes governmental Permits Forfeits for Services Earnings ursements laneous Cash Sources Total General Fund 9,359,104 1,998,200 193,000 180,200 1,181,235 6,500 75,000 11,000 5,250 13,009,489 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax - 942,000 - - - 2,000 - - - 944,000 Parks and Recreation - 240,000 200 223,000 - 1,765,504 2,228,704 Land Cash 96,000 - - - 20,500 50,000 166,500 Countryside TIF - - 1,550 - - 1,550 Downtown TIF 35,000 350 35,350 Fox Hill SSA 3,786 - - - 3,786 Sunflower SSA 7,531 - - 7,531 Debt Service Fund 328,179 1,000 300 - 329,479 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building - - - - - - - 573,374 573,374 Vehicle&Equipment - 49,275 8,850 150,150 475 50,000 1,000 - 259,750 City-Wide Capital - 327,600 20,250 - 669,120 250 - 126,441 435,401 1,579,062 Enterprise Funds Water 43,027 - - 2,458,740 2,000 54,336 82,988 2,641,090 Sewer 114,940 1,097,560 5,500 - 1,137,220 2,355,220 Recreation Center - - 61,000 - - 556,957 617,957 Library Funds Library Operations 670,415 22,200 9,300 14,000 1,300 9,250 52,174 778,639 Library Debt Service 771,763 - - - - 200 - - 771,963 Library Capital - - 20,000 - - 20 - - - 20,020 TOTAL REVENUES 11,333,745 3,386,000 283,525 198,350 5,871,805 20,645 125,000 425,027 20,500 4,658,867 26,323,464 36 United City of Yorkville Expenditures by Category Fiscal Year 2014 Other Contractual Capital Developer Debt Financing Fund FUND Salaries Benefits Services Supplies Outlay Contingencies Commitments Service Uses Total General Fund 3,583,218 2,181,806 3,830,760 292,110 - 50,000 3,777,183 13,715,077 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax - - 7,500 219,556 1,151,400 - - 1,378,456 Parks and Recreation 782,469 332,398 227,280 291,650 - 556,957 2,190,754 Land Cash - - - - 89,000 - 89,000 Countryside TIF 1,802,375 - 285,788 2,088,163 Downtown TIF 15,350 30,000 - 45,350 Fox Hill SSA 7,500 - 7,500 Sunflower SSA 14,985 - 14,985 Debt Service Fund 375 328,179 328,554 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building - - - - - Vehicle&Equipment 18,167 2,000 140,000 82,295 50,000 292,462 City-Wide Capital - - 50,000 - 1,287,000 83,333 5,250 1,425,583 Enterprise Funds Water 346,131 191,042 497,450 301,873 139,094 1,172,802 - 2,648,392 Sewer 192,000 111,144 80,950 83,206 66,773 1,968,119 82,988 2,585,179 Recreation Center 20,000 - 114,250 16,239 - - - 150,489 Library Funds Library Operations 447,540 190,977 109,049 21,250 - 768,816 Library Debt Service - - - - 771,763 771,763 Library Capital - - 3,500 35,350 - - - 38,850 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,371,358 3,007,367 6,779,491 1,263,233 2,903,266 50,000 - 4,692,279 4,472,378 28,5395372 37 United City of Yorkville Fund Balance History Fiscal Years 2011 - 2018 FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FUND Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected General Fund (271,900) 1,270,623 1,596,094 3,445,724 2,740,136 3,370,126 3,871,468 2,417,364 1,857,386 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax 640,399 924,857 465,255 1,055,589 621,133 469,021 271,653 48,885 0 Parks and Recreation 231,558 280,065 185,635 293,043 330,993 252,433 257,029 263,445 268,088 Land Cash (388,625) (294,778) (172,534) 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) Fox Industrial TIF 569,790 - - - - - - - - Countryside TIF 2,178,550 1,877,872 1,578,277 1,573,929 (512,684) (634,131) (655,579) (677,026) (698,474) Downtown TIF 209,760 257,953 264,867 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 Fox Hill SSA 17,942 17,071 16,719 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) Sunflower SSA 11,922 12,188 10,007 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) Debt Service Fund 8,653 87,510 8,925 10,686 11,611 12,536 (26,386) (69,246) 60,156 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building (587,024) (579,374) (575,774) (573,374) - - - - - Vehicle&Equipment 355,133 354,595 62,123 129,270 96,558 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 City-Wide Capital 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 Enterprise Funds * Water 825,261 1,300,837 642,452 1,379,272 1,371,971 1,359,330 1,329,770 1,301,128 1,286,117 Sewer 2,377,831 3,003,537 2,625,761 2,895,977 2,666,019 2,186,765 1,911,313 1,620,209 1,310,940 Recreation Center (195,087) (220,001) (367,521) (467,468) 0 0 0 0 0 Library Funds Library Operations 317,336 388,831 370,330 400,154 409,977 417,448 413,659 402,047 407,149 Library Debt Service - (1,821) - 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Library Capital - 6,794 - 18,830 - - - - - Totals 6,302,151 8,767,955 7,043,116 10,905,005 8,689,097 12,115,415 7,450,277 5,549,684 4,695,003 * Fund Balance Equivalent 38 United City of Yorkville Revenue Budget Summary -All Funds Fiscal Years 2011-2018 FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FUND Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected General Fund 11,517,961 12,511,852 12,311,109 13,028,337 13,009,489 13,149,787 13,330,233 13,491,732 13,720,472 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax 687,269 560,598 454,547 525,743 944,000 456,000 455,500 460,500 460,500 Parks and Recreation 1,367,262 1,199,608 1,451,447 1,419,136 2,228,704 1,573,311 1,655,908 1,680,269 1,702,344 Land Cash 474,639 430,767 420,500 452,106 166,500 23,000 23,000 423,000 23,000 Fox Industrial TIF 228,359 259,327 - - - - - - - Countryside TIF 9,506 6,906 6,500 3,100 1,550 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Downtown TIF 75,362 67,933 70,150 40,330 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 Fox Hill SSA 19,894 3,793 3,786 3,796 3,786 8,536 8,536 8,536 8,536 Sunflower SSA 13,871 7,537 7,531 7,540 7,531 17,416 17,416 17,416 17,416 Debt Service Fund 430,429 507,525 427,144 428,546 329,479 330,879 292,032 293,694 465,956 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building 20,700 8,400 5,250 9,150 573,374 - - - - Vehicle&Equipment 84,458 97,980 126,200 126,783 259,750 173,051 195,687 195,687 195,686 City-Wide Capital 321,803 227,117 1,303,732 830,702 1,579,062 5,533,630 907,820 2,634,843 1,845,567 Enterprise Funds Water 2,628,534 2,855,198 2,801,379 3,131,811 2,641,090 2,671,612 2,661,616 2,693,959 2,724,188 Sewer 1,478,074 3,120,374 1,639,817 1,643,252 2,355,220 2,237,032 2,237,214 2,236,112 2,239,226 Recreation Center 620,018 634,563 622,500 513,206 617,957 - - - - Library Funds Library Operations 1,334,042 1,095,539 817,634 788,103 778,639 788,425 790,418 792,318 819,332 Library Debt Service - 718,979 797,299 797,309 771,963 716,388 734,513 737,038 744,263 Library Capital - 350,259 16,350 30,010 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 TOTAL REVENUES 21,312,181 24,664,255 23,282,875 23,778,960 269323,464 27,734,438 239465,263 259820,473 259121,856 39 United City of Yorkville Expenditure Budget Summary-All Funds Fiscal Years 2011-2018 FY 2013 FY2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FUND Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected General Fund 11,296,930 10,969,330 11,379,867 10,853,236 13,715,077 12,519,798 12,828,891 14,945,836 14,280,450 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax 452,490 276,141 573,860 395,012 1,378,456 608,112 652,868 683,269 509,385 Parks and Recreation 1,160,854 1,151,098 1,506,767 1,406,158 2,190,754 1,651,871 1,651,312 1,673,853 1,697,702 Land Cash 257,919 336,920 323,825 72,247 89,000 356,850 263,000 13,000 63,000 Fox Industrial TIF 81,922 829,118 - - - - - - - Countryside TIF 308,716 307,585 306,043 307,043 2,088,163 121,448 121,448 121,448 121,448 Downtown TIF 1,896 19,741 41,500 36,834 45,350 45,355 45,360 45,365 45,375 Fox Hill SSA 4,178 4,664 4,500 5,476 7,500 19,603 19,603 4,603 4,603 Sunflower SSA 8,136 7,272 9,986 11,714 14,985 35,985 35,985 10,985 10,985 Debt Service Fund 429,404 428,668 505,370 505,370 328,554 329,954 330,954 336,554 336,554 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building - 750 - 3,150 - - - - - Vehicle&Equipment 164,267 98,518 282,295 352,108 292,462 211,462 195,462 195,462 195,462 City-Wide Capital 302,773 146,573 1,040,500 538,461 1,425,583 1,489,983 5,233,137 2,880,088 1,845,566 Enterprise Funds Water 2,272,173 2,379,621 3,085,983 3,053,376 2,648,392 2,684,253 2,691,176 2,722,600 2,739,200 Sewer 1,835,456 2,494,670 1,895,210 1,750,812 2,585,179 2,716,285 2,512,666 2,527,216 2,548,495 Recreation Center 687,260 659,476 703,633 760,673 150,489 - - - - Library Fund Library Operations 1,587,712 1,024,044 794,413 776,780 768,816 780,954 794,206 803,930 814,230 Library Debt Service - 720,800 795,488 795,488 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Library Capital - 343,465 13,474 17,974 38,850 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 20,852,086 22,198,454 23,262,714 21,641,910 28,539,372 24,308,121 28,130,402 27,721,066 259976,537 40 United City of Yorkville Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Fund Balance Summary Beginning Budgeted Budgeted Surplus Ending FUND Fund Balance Revenues Expenditures (Deficit) Fund Balance General Fund 3,445,724 13,009,489 13,715,077 (705,588) 2,740,136 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax 1,055,589 944,000 1,378,456 (434,456) 621,133 Parks and Recreation 293,043 2,228,704 2,190,754 37,950 330,993 Land Cash 85,081 166,500 89,000 77,500 162,581 Fox Industrial TIF - - - - - Countryside TIF 1,573,929 1,550 2,088,163 (2,086,613) (512,684) Downtown TIF 261,449 35,350 45,350 (10,000) 251,449 Fox Hill SSA 15,391 3,786 7,500 (3,714) 11,677 Sunflower SSA 8,014 7,531 14,985 (7,454) 560 Debt Service Fund 10,686 329,479 328,554 925 11,611 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building (573,374) 573,374 - 573,374 - Vehicle&Equipment 129,270 259,750 292,462 (32,712) 96,558 City-Wide Capital 373,437 1,579,062 1,425,583 153,479 526,916 Enterprise Funds Water 1,379,272 2,641,090 2,648,392 (7,301) 1,371,971 Sewer 2,895,977 2,355,220 2,585,179 (229,959) 2,666,019 Recreation Center (467,468) 617,957 150,489 467,468 0 Library Funds Library Operations 400,154 778,639 768,816 9,823 409,977 Library Debt Service 0 771,963 771,763 200 200 Library Capital 18,830 20,020 38,850 (18,830) - Totals 10,905,005 26,323,464 28,539,372 (2,215,908) 8,689,097 * Fund Balance Equivalent 41 GENERAL FUND(01) The General Fund is the City's primary operating fund. It accounts for major tax revenue used to support administrative and public safety functions. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 7,230,149 7,942,975 8,788,433 9,171,463 9,359,104 9,490,730 9,644,790 9,794,888 9,990,715 Intergovernmental 1,791,792 1,889,036 1,759,600 1,997,077 1,998,200 2,003,500 2,003,500 2,013,500 2,013,500 Licenses&Permits 241,752 171,921 169,300 169,300 193,000 193,000 218,000 218,000 243,000 Fines&Forfeits 201,236 175,159 201,500 162,200 180,200 180,200 180,200 180,200 180,200 Charges for Service 1,537,831 1,561,554 1,178,284 1,179,557 1,181,235 1,182,607 1,183,993 1,185,393 1,193,307 Investment Earnings 1,747 5,102 3,100 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 Reimbursements 484,593 419,903 199,892 218,240 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Miscellaneous 28,861 13,702 11,000 124,000 11,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Other Financing Sources - 332,500 - - 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 Total Revenue 11,517,961 12,511,852 12,311,109 13,028,337 13,009,489 13,149,787 13,330,233 13,491,732 13,720,472 Expenditures Salaries 3,517,151 3,029,713 3,371,895 3,304,920 3,583,218 3,583,218 3,583,218 3,583,218 3,583,218 Benefits 2,446,452 2,407,769 2,327,040 2,075,440 2,181,806 2,313,210 2,454,622 2,563,123 2,676,631 Contractual Services 3,470,156 3,944,907 3,840,120 3,636,073 3,830,760 3,991,365 4,061,923 4,151,412 4,245,956 Supplies 271,393 236,916 274,151 282,120 292,110 305,546 317,598 330,309 341,223 Contingencies 75,000 52,075 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Other Financing Uses 1,516,778 1,297,950 1,516,661 1,504,683 3,777,183 2,276,458 2,361,530 4,267,774 3,383,423 Total Expenditures 11,296,930 10,969,330 11,379,867 10,853,236 13,715,077 12,519,798 12,828,891 14,945,836 14,280,450 Surplus(Deficit) 221,031 1,542,522 931,242 2,175,101 (705,588) 629,989 501,342 (1,454,104) (559,978) Ending Fund Balance (271,900) 1,270,623 1,596,094 3,445,724 2,740,136 3,370,126 3,871,468 2,417,364 1,857,386 -2.41% 11.58% 14.03% 31.75% 19.98% 26.92% 30.18% 16.17% 13.01 Fund Balance $5,000 $4,000 c $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 ($1,000) 42 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected GENERAL FUND-01 01-000-40-00-4000 PROPERTY TAXES-CORPORATE LEVY 2,185,495 2,282,246 2,288,133 2,276,807 2,288,154 2,311,036 2,334,146 2,357,487 2,381,062 01-000-40-00-4010 PROPERTY TAXES-POLICE PENSION 336,075 360,356 413,354 438,711 562,000 587,000 612,000 637,000 662,000 01-00040-004085 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX INDUSTRIAL TIF - 67,334 20,000 - - - - - - 01-00040-00-4030 MUNICIPAL SALES TAX 2,569,233 2,552,483 2,325,000 2,425,000 2,449,250 2,473,743 2,523,217 2,573,682 2,650,892 01-000-40-00-4035 NON-HOME RULE SALES TAX - 410,327 1,500,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,818,000 1,854,360 1,891,447 1,948,191 01-00040-004040 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 605,833 603,015 603,432 603,432 605,000 611,050 617,161 623,332 629,565 01-000-40-00-4041 NATURAL GAS UTILITY TAX 268,166 225,411 296,514 250,000 275,000 280,000 282,800 285,628 288,484 01-000-40-00-4043 EXCISE TAX 491,188 500,415 490,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 506,000 506,000 510,000 01-000-40-00-4044 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 23,002 18,393 23,500 20,000 20,200 20,402 20,606 20,812 21,020 01-000-40-00-4045 CABLE FRANCHISE FEES 228,452 221,465 230,000 230,000 230,000 230,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 01-000-40-00-4050 HOTELTAX 38,198 51,029 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 01-000-40-00-4060 AMUSEMENT TAX 319 127,737 134,000 148,000 165,000 195,000 195,000 200,000 200,000 01-000-40-00-4065 ADMISSIONS TAX 181,744 190,627 104,500 119,199 104,500 104,500 104,500 104,500 104,500 01-00040-00-4070 BUSINESS DISTRICT TAX-KNDLL MKTPLCE 289,015 305,908 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 01-00040-004072 BUSINESS DISTRICT TAX-DOWNTOWN - - - - - - - - - 01-000-40-00-4075 AUTO RENTAL TAX 8,298 9,549 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 01-000-40-00-4080 PARA-MUTUEL TAX 5,131 16,680 - 314 - - - - - 01-000-41-004100 STATE INCOME TAX 1,315,321 1,444,426 1,320,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 01-000-41-00-4105 LOCAL USE TAX 240,047 246,963 242,400 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 255,000 255,000 01-000-41-00-4110 ROAD&BRIDGE TAX 164,296 166,896 170,000 168,477 170,000 175,000 175,000 180,000 180,000 01-00041-004120 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX 16,394 15,030 16,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 01-00041-00-4160 FEDERAL GRANTS 13,288 12,521 9,200 12,500 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 01-000-41-00-4170 STATE GRANTS 40,250 2,123 - - - - - - - 01-000-41-00-4182 MISC INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2,196 1,077 2,000 1,100 1,200 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 01-000-42-00-4200 LIQUOR LICENSE 38,903 43,265 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 01-000-42-00-4205 OTHER LICENSES&PERMITS 2,670 6,256 2,700 2,700 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-000-42-004210 BUILDING PERMITS 126,829 122,400 126,600 126,600 150,000 150,000 175,000 175,000 200,000 01-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES 73,350 - - - - - - - - 01-000-43-00-4310 CIRCUIT COURT FINES 95,289 66,028 95,000 60,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 01-000-43-00-4320 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION 25,457 24,206 26,000 32,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 43 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 01-00043-004323 OFFENDER REGISTRATION FEES - 175 500 200 200 200 200 200 200 01-000-43-00-4325 POLICE TOWS 80,490 84,750 80,000 70,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 01-000-44-00-4400 GARBAGE SURCHARGE 1,177,995 1,231,681 1,021,784 1,023,581 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,030,000 01-000-44-00-4407 LATE PENALTIES-GARBAGE - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-000-44-00-4405 COLLECTION FEE-YBSD 116,087 134,531 151,500 135,876 137,235 138,607 139,993 141,393 142,807 01-000-44-00-4414 OTHER SERVICES 3,960 - - - - - - - - 01-00044-00-4451 WATER CHARGEBACK 91,863 91,863 01-00044-004452 SEWER CHARGEBACK 83,045 83,045 01-000-44-00-4472 LAND CASH CHARGEBACK 60,449 20,084 - - - - - - - 01-00044-00-4474 POLICE SPECIAL DETAIL 4,432 350 5,000 100 500 500 500 500 500 01-00045-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1,747 5,102 3,100 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 01-000-46-00-4601 REIMB-LEGAL EXPENSES 46,951 28,738 - - - - - - - 01-000-46-00-4604 REIMB-ENGINEERING EXPENSES - 25,697 - - - - - - - 01-000-46-00-4650 REIMB-TRAFFIC SIGNAL 33,067 28,582 15,000 20,019 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-000-46-00-4668 REIMB-COBRA CONTRIBUTIONS 21,675 23,220 12,500 817 - - - - - 01-000-46-00-4669 REIMB-RETIREE INS CONTRIBUTIONS 39,671 48,447 60,398 50,994 01-00046-004670 REIMB-EMPLOYEE INS CONTRIBUTIONS 193,147 91,536 61,295 66,571 01-00046-004671 REIMB-LIFE INSURANCE 4,789 3,363 1,699 2,229 01-00046-004672 REIMB-LIBRARY INSURANCE - 93,842 - - - - - - - 01-00046-004680 REIMB-LIABILITY INSURANCE 35,711 3,417 5,000 29,610 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 01-00046-004681 REIMB-WORKERS COMP 22,207 25,557 - - - - - - - 01-00046-004685 REIMB-CABLE CONSORTIUM 19,505 37,167 40,000 37,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 01-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 67,870 10,337 4,000 11,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 01-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 5,600 8,460 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 01-00048-004821 BAD DEBT RECOVERY 10,849 - - - - - - - - 01-00048-004845 DONATIONS 2,784 50 - - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-00048-004850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 9,628 5,192 3,000 116,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-000-49-00-4916 TRANSFER FROM MUNICIPAL BUILDING - - - - 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 01-000-49-00-4984 TRANSFER FROM LIBRARY CAPITAL - 332,500 - - - - - - - Revenue 11,517,961 12,5119852 12,3119109 13,028,337 13,009,489 13,149,787 13,330,233 13,491,732 13,720,472 44 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT The Administration Department includes both the legislative and management expenditures. The legislative branch consists of the Mayor and City Council. The city administrator is hired by the Mayor with the consent of the City Council. City staff report to the city administrator. It is the role of the city administrator to direct staff in the daily administration of City services. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 319,269 307,078 333,395 338,320 372,745 372,745 372,745 372,745 372,745 Benefits 48,949 49,070 275,732 260,903 240,161 257,470 276,509 289,080 302,403 Contractual Services 119,138 111,976 160,250 158,900 146,800 132,745 133,887 134,929 136,023 Supplies 11,264 8,084 12,950 12,950 12,950 12,950 12,950 12,950 12,950 Total Administration 498,620 476,208 782,327 771,073 772,656 775,910 796,092 809,704 824,121 $900 $800 $700 s° $600 r $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 45 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Administration 01-110-50-00-5001 SALARIES-MAYOR 10,700 10,105 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 01-110-50-00-5002 SALARIES-LIQUOR COMM 1,167 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 01-110-50-00-5003 SALARIES-CITY CLERK 9,305 8,535 9,000 9,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 01-110-50-00-5004 SALARIES-CITY TREASURER 6,105 5,800 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 01-110-50-00-5005 SALARIES-ALDERMAN 52,455 48,270 50,320 50,320 52,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 01-110-50-00-5007 SALARIES-ADMINISTRATION 239,314 232,228 255,000 260,000 268,745 268,745 268,745 268,745 268,745 01-110-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES - - - - 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 01-110-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 223 1,140 575 500 500 500 500 500 500 01-110-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 26,574 27,723 28,383 30,000 38,584 38,584 38,584 38,584 38,584 01-110-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 22,375 21,347 22,500 22,500 27,404 27,404 27,404 27,404 27,404 01-110-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 72,456 72,456 68,313 75,144 82,659 87,618 92,875 01-110-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 614 614 500 505 510 515 520 01-110-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 5,096 5,096 6,059 6,665 7,331 7,771 8,238 01-110-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 586 586 649 714 785 832 882 01-110-52-00-5235 ELECTED OFFICIAL-GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 133,917 120,000 89,956 98,952 108,847 115,378 122,300 01-110-52-00-5236 ELECTED OFFICIAL-GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1,043 750 700 707 714 721 728 01-110-52-00-5237 ELECTED OFFICIAL-DENTAL INSURANCE 10,008 8,000 7,221 7,943 8,737 9,262 9,817 01-110-52-00-5238 ELECTED OFFICIAL-VISION INSURANCE - 1,129 900 775 853 938 994 1,054 01-110-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - 1,925 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-110-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 790 1,565 6,000 6,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 01-110-54-00-5423 PUBLIC RELATIONS 55 - - - - - - - - 01-110-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 655 774 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 01-110-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING 8,081 5,972 6,750 6,750 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 01-110-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 12,520 14,085 15,000 18,750 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-110-54-00-5448 FILING FEES - - 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 01-110-54-00-5451 CODIFICATION 4,159 3,902 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 01-110-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 8,055 4,449 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 01-110-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 12,872 12,368 16,600 16,600 16,600 16,600 16,600 16,600 16,600 01-110-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,539 13,581 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-110-54-00-5473 KENDALL COUNTY PARATRANSIT 27,553 23,550 30,000 30,000 15,000 - - - - 01-110-54-00-5474 SENIOR SERVICE FUNDING - - - - - 46 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 01-110-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 21,735 13,887 23,100 18,000 18,900 19,845 20,837 21,879 22,973 01-110-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 1,716 1,900 1,900 2,150 2,150 2,300 2,300 2,300 01-110-54-00-5488 OFFICE CLEANING 13,124 14,202 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 01-110-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 9,320 8,015 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 01-110-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 1,944 - 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 01-110-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - 69 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 498,620 476,208 782,327 771,073 772,656 775,910 7969092 809,704 824,121 47 FINANCE DEPARTMENT The Finance Department is responsible for the accounting,internal controls,external reporting and auditing of all financial transactions. The Finance Department is in charge of the annual audit,utility billing,payables and payroll and works with administration in the preparation of the annual budget. Personnel are budgeted in the General and Water funds. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 201,586 170,294 185,000 180,000 186,852 186,852 186,852 186,852 186,852 Benefits 34,085 29,628 62,135 62,377 62,603 65,345 68,361 70,352 72,463 Contractual Services 93,906 80,204 88,150 75,100 82,550 86,750 87,850 88,950 91,550 Supplies 3,281 4,042 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 Total Finance 332,858 284,168 340,535 322,727 337,255 344,197 348,313 351,404 356,115 $400 $350 $300 3 $250 0 F $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 48 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Finance 01-120-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 201,586 170,294 185,000 180,000 186,852 186,852 186,852 186,852 186,852 01-120-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 18,759 16,586 18,659 18,659 20,708 20,708 20,708 20,708 20,708 01-120-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 15,326 13,042 13,005 13,500 14,143 14,143 14,143 14,143 14,143 01-120-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 26,472 26,472 23,655 26,021 28,623 30,340 32,160 01-120-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 461 360 370 374 377 381 385 01-120-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 3,182 3,062 3,367 3,704 4,074 4,319 4,578 01-120-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - 356 324 360 396 436 462 489 01-120-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - 670 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-120-54-00-5414 AUDITING SERVICES 43,500 44,800 36,000 31,000 31,000 35,200 36,300 37,400 40,000 01-120-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 237 1,000 500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-120-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING - - 500 1,500 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 01-120-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 633 540 600 1,000 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 01-120-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 474 648 500 750 750 750 750 750 750 01-120-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 902 480 850 600 800 800 800 800 800 01-120-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 29,531 27,255 40,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 01-120-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 18,028 5,324 4,900 2,250 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 01-120-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 838 250 1,800 500 750 750 750 750 750 01-120-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,520 1,955 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 01-120-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 01-120-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 1,761 2,087 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 332,858 2849168 340,535 322,727 337,255 344,197 348,313 351,404 356,115 49 COMMUNITY RELATIONS The Community Relations department was closed out at the end of fiscal year 2011. Expenditures are now budgeted out of the administrative services department. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 63,359 - - - - - - - - Benefits 7,939 - - - - - - - - Contractual Services 11,361 333 - - - - - - - Supplies 656 - - - - - - - - Total Community Relations 83,315 333 - - - - - - - $100 $80 3 t $60 H $40 $20 $0 50 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Community Relations O1-130-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 63,359 O1-130-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 4,004 O1-130-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 3,935 - 01-130-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 5,977 333 01-130-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 279 - 01-130-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 1,630 01-130-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,475 01-130-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 130 O1-130-56-00-5692 COMMUNITY EVENTS 526 - 83,315 333 - - - - 51 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT The Engineering Department was closed out at the beginning of fiscal year 2012. Expenditures are now budgeted out of the administrative services department. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 235,639 75,383 - - - - - - - Benefits 95,112 22,485 - - - - - - - Contractual Services 10,022 4,348 - - - - - - - Supplies 9,994 7 - - - - - - - Total Engineering 350,767 102,223 - - - - - - - $400 c $350 $300 s° $250 r $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 52 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Engineering O1-150-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 235,552 75,383 O1-150-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 87 - O1-150-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 21,727 7,169 01-150-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 17,409 5,716 01-150-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 50,712 8,826 01-150-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 909 76 01-150-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 3,814 627 O1-150-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 541 71 O1-150-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 3 O1-150-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING 1,116 286 O1-150-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1,340 207 01-150-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 257 23 w, 01-150-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 428 - 01-150-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,578 2,164 01-150-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 1,638 -• u O1-150-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 1,303 27 . O1-150-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,006 7 ,_ O1-150-56-00-5622 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 928 _. O1-150-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 2,627 01-150-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS 126 01-150-56-00-5690 SUPPLIES-GRANT REIMBURSABLE 5,307 - 350,767 102,223 - - - - - - 53 POLICE DEPARTMENT The mission of the Yorkville Police Department is to work in partnership with the community to protect life and property,assist neighborhoods with solving their problems and enhance thf quality of life in our city. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 2,127,332 2,028,011 2,305,500 2,279,500 2,462,197 2,462,197 2,462,197 2,462,197 2,462,197 Benefits 507,612 521,435 1,169,457 1,115,046 1,289,493 1,367,019 1,449,795 1,512,939 1,578,370 Contractual Services 131,034 163,951 213,850 209,180 209,350 263,006 287,142 286,142 287,141 Supplies 112,842 133,023 151,770 138,700 153,270 159,637 166,449 173,738 181,537 Total Police 2,878,820 2,846,420 3,840,577 3,742,426 4,114,310 4,251,859 4,365,582 4,435,016 4,509,245 $5,000 $4,500 $4,000 c $3,500 ° $3,000 s H $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 54 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Police 01-210-50-00-5006 SALARIES-LIEUT/SERGEANTS/CHIEFS 660,249 600,533 - - - - - - - 01-210-50-00-5008 SALARIES-POLICE OFFICERS 1,167,964 1,149,440 1,261,000 1,261,000 1,404,518 1,404,518 1,404,518 1,404,518 1,404,518 01-210-50-00-5011 SALARIES-POLICE CHIEF&DEPUTIES - - 317,000 295,000 305,000 305,000 305,000 305,000 305,000 01-210-50-00-5012 SALARIES-SERGEANTS - - 430,000 410,000 439,849 439,849 439,849 439,849 439,849 01-210-50-00-5013 SALARIES-POLICE CLERKS 156,502 128,755 135,000 130,000 129,330 129,330 129,330 129,330 129,330 01-210-50-00-5014 SALARIES-CROSSING GUARD 17,381 19,413 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-210-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 30,604 33,832 52,500 52,500 52,500 52,500 52,500 52,500 52,500 01-210-50-00-5017 CADET PROGRAM 12,045 6,089 - - - - - - - 01-210-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 82,587 89,949 90,000 111,000 111,000 111,000 111,000 111,000 111,000 01-210-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 14,455 11,696 15,818 14,000 14,333 14,333 14,333 14,333 14,333 01-210-52-00-5213 EMPLOYER CONTRI-POLICE PENSION 336,075 360,356 413,354 438,711 562,000 587,000 612,000 637,000 662,000 01-210-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 157,082 149,383 175,000 175,000 184,704 184,704 184,704 184,704 184,704 01-210-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 517,950 440,000 478,421 526,263 578,889 613,623 650,440 01-210-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 5,635 5,635 3,550 3,586 3,621 3,658 3,694 01-210-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 37,428 37,428 42,090 46,299 50,929 53,985 57,224 01-210-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - 4,272 4,272 4,395 4,835 5,318 5,637 5,975 01-210-54-00-5410 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 1,808 1,510 2,800 - 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 01-210-54-00-5411 POLICE COMMISSION 3,677 16,281 4,000 9,000 16,500 4,000 15,000 4,000 15,000 01-210-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCE 8,554 8,275 15,000 15,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 01-210-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 1,873 6,690 10,000 6,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 01-210-54-00-5422 VEHICLE&EQUIPMENT CHARGEBACK - - - - - 56,156 78,792 78,792 78,791 01-210-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 86 11 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 01-210-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING 2,923 4,151 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 01-210-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 22,142 25,933 36,500 36,500 36,500 36,500 36,500 36,500 36,500 01-210-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 986 1,346 3,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-210-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,115 1,340 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 01-210-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,222 17,989 5,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 01-210-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - - 20,000 20,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 01-210-54-00-5467 ADJUDICATION SERVICES 16,863 18,078 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-210-54-00-5469 NEW WORLD LIVE SCAN 10,281 10,944 15,000 9,666 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 01-210-54-00-5472 KENDALL CO.JUVE PROBATION 2,683 2,389 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 55 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 01-210-54-00-5484 MDT-ALERTS FEE 6,660 6,660 7,000 6,660 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 01-210-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 4,224 4,500 5,304 6,500 6,500 7,000 7,000 7,000 01-210-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 47,161 38,130 61,000 61,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 01-210-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 10,586 17,449 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 01-210-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,933 2,266 4,000 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 01-210-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 7,061 6,491 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 01-210-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 5,032 8,405 7,000 6,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 01-210-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 6,569 12,821 12,250 12,000 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 01-210-56-00-5650 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3,020 77 7,370 1,000 7,370 7,370 7,370 7,370 7,370 01-210-56-00-5690 SUPPLIES-GRANT REIMBURSABLE 5,566 4,314 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 01-210-56-00-5695 GASOLINE 70,080 79,977 90,950 85,000 90,950 97,317 104,129 111,418 119,217 01-210-56-00-5696 AMMUNITION 1,995 1,223 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,878,820 2,846,420 3,840,577 3,742,426 4,114,310 49251,859 4,365,582 4,435,016 4,5099245 56 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT The primary focus of the Community Development Department is to ensure that all existing and new construction is consistent with the overall development goals of the City which entails short and long-range planning,administration of zoning regulations,building permits issuance and code enforcement.The department also provides staff support to the City Council,Plan Commission,Zoning Board of Appeals and Park Board and assists in the review of all development plans proposed within the United City of Yorkville. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 269,607 188,249 248,000 220,000 228,419 228,419 228,419 228,419 228,419 Benefits 43,761 31,460 109,797 92,911 88,043 92,901 98,244 101,771 105,510 Contractual Services 69,730 83,661 92,350 69,717 81,750 83,622 85,769 87,794 89,899 Supplies 12,193 3,683 11,279 16,682 11,535 11,808 12,101 12,415 12,750 Total Community Development 395,291 307,053 461,426 399,310 409,747 416,750 424,533 430,398 436,578 $500 v N $400 3 O $300 $200 $100 $0 57 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Community Development 01-220-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 269,607 188,249 195,000 190,000 198,419 198,419 198,419 198,419 198,419 01-220-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES - - 53,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 01-220-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 24,175 17,492 26,227 21,500 21,990 21,990 21,990 21,990 21,990 01-220-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 19,586 13,968 19,000 17,000 17,164 17,164 17,164 17,164 17,164 01-220-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 59,499 50,000 44,261 48,687 53,556 56,769 60,175 01-220-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 461 511 350 354 357 361 364 01-220-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 4,139 3,500 3,853 4,239 4,663 4,942 5,239 01-220-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - 471 400 425 468 514 545 578 01-220-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 115 1,144 1,500 1,763 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-220-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 573 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 01-220-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 87 185 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 01-220-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING 1,062 994 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 01-220-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1,318 1,736 1,500 2,400 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-220-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 230 719 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 01-220-54-00-5459 INSPECTIONS 17,387 26,060 25,000 - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 01-220-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,016 1,075 1,500 2,804 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-220-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,738 1,026 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 01-220-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES 1,777 3,511 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-220-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 1,638 3,600 3,000 2,700 2,700 2,900 2,900 2,900 01-220-54-00-5486 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 46,800 48,672 50,619 52,644 54,749 01-220-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 469 311 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 01-220-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 712 2,928 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-220-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 01-220-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 2,171 - 3,500 9,153 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 01-220-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS 493 444 500 250 500 500 500 500 500 01-220-56-00-5690 SUPPLIES-GRANT REIMBURSABLE 8,348 - - - - - - - - 01-220-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - - 3,654 3,654 3,910 4,183 4,476 4,790 5,125 395,291 307,053 461,426 399,310 409,747 416,750 424,533 430,398 436,578 58 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The Public Works Department is an integral part of the United City of Yorkville. We provide high quality drinking water,efficient disposal of sanitary waste and maintain a comprehensive road and storm sewer network to ensure the safety and quality of life for the citizens of Yorkville. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 295,927 260,348 295,000 287,000 332,505 332,505 332,505 332,505 332,505 Benefits 49,515 44,246 147,530 150,914 152,791 161,841 171,795 178,367 185,333 Contractual Services 1,321,931 1,314,041 1,390,020 1,227,880 1,446,570 1,318,180 1,282,901 1,291,052 1,303,484 Supplies 121,163 85,167 87,902 95,950 104,105 110,901 115,848 120,956 123,736 Total Public Works 1,788,536 1,703,802 1,920,452 1,761,744 2,035,971 1,923,427 1,903,050 1,922,880 1,945,058 $2,100 $2,000 3 O r $1,900 $1,800 $1,700 $1,600 $1,500 59 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Street Operations 01410-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 285,143 253,695 280,000 272,000 317,505 317,505 317,505 317,505 317,505 01-410-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 10,784 6,653 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 01-410-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 27,424 24,887 31,753 31,753 36,851 36,851 36,851 36,851 36,851 01-410-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 22,091 19,359 23,500 22,000 24,857 24,857 24,857 24,857 24,857 01-410-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 83,361 88,000 82,000 90,200 99,220 105,173 111,484 01-410-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1,317 1,311 650 657 663 670 676 01-410-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 6,826 7,100 7,608 8,369 9,206 9,758 10,344 01-410-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - 773 750 825 908 998 1,058 1,122 01410-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 180 1,440 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01410-54-00-5422 VEHICLE&EQUIPMENT CHARGEBACK - - - - 144,650 51,795 51,795 51,795 51,795 01-410-54-00-5435 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-410-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 2,053 2,506 4,020 2,600 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01410-54-00-5446 PROPERTY&BLDG MAINT SERVICES 8,267 18,329 20,000 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 30,000 01-410-54-00-5454 SIDEWALK PROGRAM 1,225 869 4,000 2,000 - - - - - 01410-54-00-5455 MOSQUITO CONTROL 6,500 6,500 7,000 6,730 8,000 8,400 8,820 9,261 9,724 01-410-54-00-5458 TREE&STUMP REMOVAL 8,300 6,025 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01410-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,165 970 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 01-410-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 89,784 57,145 90,000 90,000 94,500 99,225 104,186 109,396 114,865 01-410-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 176 1,051 1,000 1,050 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 01-410-54-00-5490 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 22,110 20,886 35,000 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-410-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 2,386 2,581 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 01-410-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3,801 10,648 9,500 9,500 9,975 10,474 10,997 11,547 12,125 01-410-56-00-5626 HANGING BASKETS 2,048 2,041 - - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01410-56-00-5628 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01410-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 1,896 7,962 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 01-410-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 76,277 22,671 36,500 36,500 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-410-56-00-5656 PROPERTY&BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES 5,405 8,240 20,000 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 30,000 01-410-56-00-5695 GASOLINE 29,350 31,024 15,952 24,000 25,680 27,478 29,401 31,459 33,661 606,365 505,482 714,452 714,244 926,151 856,767 879,550 899,380 915,058 60 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Health&Sanitation O1-540-54-00-5441 GARBAGE SERVICES-SENIOR SUBSIDY - - 153,216 143,000 86,320 43,160 - - - O1-540-54-00-5442 GARBAGE SERVICES 1,177,611 1,193,400 1,046,784 900,000 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,030,000 O1-540-54-00-5443 LEAF PICKUP 4,560 4,920 6,000 4,500 - - - - - 1,182,171 1,198,320 1,206,000 1,0479500 1,109,820 1,066,660 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,030,000 Total Public Works 1,788,536 1,703,802 1,920,452 19761,744 2,035,971 1,923,427 1,9039050 1,922,880 1,945,058 61 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT The Administrative Services Department accounts for general fund expenditures that are shared by all departments and cannot be easily classified in one department or the other. These expenditures include such items as tax rebates,bad debt,contingencies,corporate legal expenditures and interfund transfers. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 4,432 350 5,000 100 500 500 500 500 500 Benefits 1,659,479 1,709,445 562,389 393,290 348,715 368,634 389,919 410,614 432,551 Contractual Services 1,713,034 2,186,393 1,895,500 1,895,296 1,863,740 2,107,062 2,184,374 2,262,546 2,337,858 Supplies - 2,910 5,000 12,588 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Contingencies 75,000 52,075 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Other Financing Uses 1,516,778 1,297,950 1,516,661 1,504,683 3,777,183 2,276,458 2,361,530 4,267,774 3,383,423 Total Admin Services&Transfers 4,968,723 5,249,123 4,034,550 3,855,956 6,045,138 4,807,655 4,991,322 6,996,433 6,209,331 $8,000 $7,000 3 $6,000 0 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 62 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Administrative Services 01-640-50-00-5092 POLICE SPECIAL DETAIL WAGES 4,432 350 5,000 100 500 500 500 500 500 01-640-52-00-5211 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION-ERI - - 60,000 - - - - - - 01-640-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 1,135,216 1,199,018 - 01-640-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 23,151 14,022 01-640-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 83,004 86,598 01-640-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 11,991 10,117 - 01-640-52-00-5225 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE 2,425 - 150 - - - - - - 01-640-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 77,786 91,200 47,143 37,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 01-640-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE 325,906 308,490 332,256 250,000 261,302 276,980 293,599 311,215 329,888 01-640-52-00-5240 RETIREES-GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 104,458 100,000 42,413 46,654 51,320 54,399 57,663 01-640-52-00-5241 RETIREES-DENTAL INSURANCE 5,246 5,246 - - - - - 01-640-52-00-5242 RETIREES-VISION INSURANCE 636 636 01-640-52-00-5250 COBRA-GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 11,375 408 01-640-52-00-5251 COBRA-DENTAL INSURANCE 1,000 - 01-640-52-00-5252 COBRA-VISION INSURANCE 125 - - - - - 01-640-54-00-5439 AMUSEMENT TAX REBATE - 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 37,500 01-640-54-00-5449 KENCOM - - - - 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 01-640-54-00-5450 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 55,155 140,000 140,000 90,000 94,500 99,225 104,186 109,396 01-640-54-00-5453 SPECIAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - - - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 01-640-54-00-5456 CORPORATE COUNSEL 117,960 81,998 130,000 110,000 110,000 115,500 121,275 127,339 133,706 01-640-54-00-5461 LITIGATION COUNSEL 87,544 70,469 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 01-640-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 450 500 901 500 500 500 500 500 01-640-54-00-5463 SPECIAL COUNSEL 59,394 25,261 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 01-640-54-00-5465 ENGINEERING SERVICES - 222,269 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 01-640-54-00-5475 CABLE CONSORTIUM FEE 75,262 93,150 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 01-640-54-00-5479 COMMUNITY RELATIONS - 440 - - - - - - - 01-640-54-00-5481 HOTEL TAX REBATE 33,255 45,926 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 01-640-54-00-5491 CITY PROPERTY TAX REBATE 812 1,532 1,500 1,196 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 01-640-54-00-5492 SALES TAX REBATE 863,793 1,024,421 824,000 824,000 832,240 840,562 857,374 874,521 900,757 01-640-54-00-5493 BUSINESS DISTRICT REBATE 283,777 305,908 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 01-640-54-00-5494 ADMISSIONS TAX REBATE 99,959 104,845 104,500 119,199 104,500 104,500 104,500 104,500 104,500 63 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 01-640-54-00-5499 BAD DEBT 91,278 154,569 - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 O1-640-56-00-5625 REIMBURSABLE REPAIRS - 2,910 5,000 12,588 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 O1-640-70-00-7799 CONTINGENCIES 75,000 52,075 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 01-640-99-00-9916 TRANSFER TO MUNICIPAL BUILDING - - - - 573,374 - - - - 01-640-99-00-9923 TRANSFER TO CITYWIDE CAPITAL 135,484 125,000 419,332 419,332 270,401 1,798,213 643,477 O1-640-99-00-9942 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE 429,404 103,740 99,465 99,465 - - - 82,372 335,254 01-640-99-00-9952 TRANSFER TO SEWER - - - - 1,137,220 1,133,972 1,134,654 1,134,052 1,137,166 01-640-99-00-9979 TRANSFER TO PARKS&RECREATION 951,890 736,710 955,886 955,886 1,765,504 1,110,111 1,192,708 1,217,069 1,229,444 01-640-99-00-9982 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY OPERATIONS - 332,500 41,978 30,000 30,684 32,375 34,168 36,068 38,082 4,968,723 5,249,123 4,034,550 3,855,956 6,045,138 4,807,655 4,991,322 6,996,433 692099331 Expenditures 11,296,930 10,969,330 11,379,867 10,853,236 13,715,077 12,5199798 129828,891 149945,836 14,280,450 Surplus(Deficit) 221,031 1,542,522 931,242 2,175,101 (705,588) 629,989 501,342 (1,454,104) (559,978) Fund Balance (2719900) 192709623 195969094 3,445,724 2,7409136 393709126 398719468 29417,364 1,857,386 -2.41% 11.58% 14.03% 31.75% 19.98% 26.92% 30.18% 16.17% 13.01% 64 Fox Hill SSA Fund (11) This fund was created for the purpose of maintaining the common areas of the Fox Hill Estates(SSA 2004-201)subdivision. All money for the fund is derived from property taxes levied on homeowners in the subdivision. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 19,894 3,786 3,786 3,786 3,786 8,536 8,536 8,536 8,536 Investment Earnings - 7 - 10 - - - - - Total Revenue 19,894 3,793 3,786 3,796 3,786 8,536 8,536 8,536 8,536 Expenditures Contractual Services 4,178 4,664 4,500 5,476 7,500 19,603 19,603 4,603 4,603 Total Expenditures 4,178 4,664 4,500 5,476 7,500 19,603 19,603 4,603 4,603 Surplus(Deficit) 15,716 (871) (714) (1,680) (3,714) (11,067) (11,067) 3,933 3,933 Ending Fund Balance 17,942 17,071 16,719 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) 429.44% 36602% 371.53% 281.06% 155.69% 3.11% -53.34% -141.73% -5629% $20 Fund Balance M N $10 3 $0 F ($10) ($20) 65 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Fox Hill SSA-11 11-00040-004011 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX HILL SSA 19,894 3,786 3,786 3,786 3,786 8,536 8,536 8,536 8,536 I1-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - 7 - 10 - - - - - Revenue 19,894 3,793 3,786 3,796 3,786 8,536 8,536 89536 8,536 11-111-54-00-5417 TRAIL MAINTENANCE - - - - - 15,000 15,000 - - I1-111-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 4,178 4,664 4,500 5,476 7,500 4,603 4,603 4,603 4,603 Expenditures 49178 4,664 4,500 5,476 7,500 19,603 19,603 4,603 4,603 Surplus(Deficit) 15,716 (871) (714) (1,680) (3,714) (11,067) (11,067) 3,933 3,933 Fund Balance 17,942 17,071 16,719 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) 429.44% 366.02% 371.53% 281.06% 155.69% 3.11% -53.34% -141.73% -5629% 66 Sunflower SSA Fund (12) This fund was created for the purpose of maintaining the common areas of the Sunflower Estates(SSA 2006-119)subdivision. All money for the fund is derived from property taxes levied on homeowners in the subdivision. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 13,871 7,530 7,531 7,530 7,531 17,416 17,416 17,416 17,416 Investment Earnings - 7 - 10 - - - - - Total Revenue 13,871 7,537 7,531 7,540 7,531 17,416 17,416 17,416 17,416 Expenditures Contractual Services 8,136 7,272 9,986 11,714 14,985 35,985 35,985 10,985 10,985 Total Expenditures 8,136 7,272 9,986 11,714 14,985 35,985 35,985 10,985 10,985 Surplus(Deficit) 5,735 265 (2,455) (4,174) (7,454) (18,569) (18,569) 6,431 6,431 Ending Fund Balance 11,922 12,188 10,007 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) 14653% 167.60% 100.21% 68.41% 3.74% -50.05% -101.65% -274.44% -215.89% $20 Fund Balance $0 0 s ($20) ($40) 67 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Sunflower SSA-12 12-00040-004012 PROPERTY TAXES-SUNFLOWER SSA 13,871 7,530 7,531 7,530 7,531 17,416 17,416 17,416 17,416 12-00045-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - 7 - 10 - - - - - Revenue 13,871 7,537 7,531 7,540 7,531 17,416 17,416 17,416 17,416 12-112-54-00-5416 POND MAINTENANCE - - - - - 25,000 25,000 - - 12-112-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 8,136 7,272 9,986 11,714 14,985 10,985 10,985 10,985 10,985 Expenditures 8,136 7,272 9,986 11,714 14,985 35,985 35,985 10,985 10,985 Surplus(Deficit) 5,735 265 (2,455) (4,174) (7,454) (18,569) (18,569) 6,431 6,431 Fund Balance 11,922 12,188 10,007 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) 14653% 167.60% 100.21% 68.41% 3.74% -50.05% -101.65% -274.44% -215.89% 68 Motor Fuel Tax Fund (15) The Motor Fuel Tax fund is used to maintain existing and construct new City owned roadways,alleys and parking lots. The fund also purchases materials used in the maintenance and operation of those facilities. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Intergovernmental 535,347 560,028 454,197 522,286 942,000 455,000 455,000 460,000 460,000 Investment Earnings 837 570 350 3,200 2,000 1,000 500 500 500 Reimbursements 151,000 - - 257 - - - - - Miscellaneous 85 - - - - - - - - Total Revenue 687,269 560,598 454,547 525,743 944,000 456,000 455,500 460,500 460,500 Expenditures Contractual Services 33,516 - - 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Supplies 227,168 200,355 341,960 200,860 219,556 228,712 238,468 248,869 259,963 Capital Outlay 95,806 75,786 231,900 186,652 1,151,400 371,900 406,900 426,900 241,922 Other Financing Uses 96,000 - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures 452,490 276,141 573,860 395,012 1,378,456 608,112 652,868 683,269 509,385 Surplus(Deficit) 234,779 284,457 (119,313) 130,732 (434,456) (152,112) (197,368) (222,769) (48,885) Ending Fund Balance 640,399 924,857 465,255 1,055,589 621,133 469,021 271,653 48,885 0 y $1,200 Fund Balance $1,000 a $800 $600 4" $400 $200 $0 69 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Motor Fuel Tax -15 15-000-41-00-4112 MOTOR FUEL TAX 425,971 417,416 415,000 410,000 410,000 415,000 415,000 420,000 420,000 15-000-41-00-4113 MFT HIGH GROWTH 24,674 39,197 39,197 39,164 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 15-000-41-00-4170 STATE GRANTS 11,580 30;293 - - 492,000 - - - - 15-000-41-00-4172 ILLINOIS JOBS NOW PROCEEDS 73,122 73,122 - 73,122 - - - - - 15-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 837 570 350 3,200 2,000 1,000 500 500 500 15-000-46-00-4605 REIMB-OLD JAIUDWTWN PARKING LOT 151,000 - - - - - - - - 15-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS - 257 15-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 85 - - - - - - - Revenue 687,269 560,598 454,547 525,743 944,000 456,000 455,500 460,500 460,500 15-155-54-00-5438 SALT STORAGE - - - 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 15-155-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,587 - - - - - - 15-155-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 30,929 - - - - - - - - 15-155-56-00-5618 SALT 132,777 129,391 231,000 115,000 126,000 132,300 138,915 145,861 153,154 15-155-56-00-5619 SIGNS 1,232 6,732 35,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15-155-56-00-5632 PATCHING 52,481 47,093 50,000 47,007 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 15-155-56-00-5633 COLD PATCH 9,892 5,855 11,660 6,441 12,826 14,109 15,519 17,071 18,779 15-155-56-00-5634 HOT PATCH 7,658 11,284 14,300 12,412 15,730 17,303 19,033 20,937 23,030 15-155-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 23,128 - - - - - - - - 15-155-60-00-6003 MATERIAL STORAGE BLDG CONSTRUCTION - 75,000 - - - - 15-155-60-00-6025 ROAD TO BETTER ROADS PROGRAM - - 250,000 250,000 250,000 205,000 120,022 15-155-60-00-6072 DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT 42,420 875 - - 492,000 - - - - 15-155-60-00-6073 GAME FARM ROAD PROJECT 31,456 68,086 110,000 110,000 212,500 15-155-60-00-6074 FOX ROAD PROJECT 21,930 - - - - 15-155-60-00-6075 RIVER ROAD BRIDGE PROJECT - 6,825 - - - - - - - 15-155-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - 121,900 76,652 121,900 121,900 121,900 121,900 121,900 15-155-60-00-6089 CANNONBALL LAFO PROJECT - - - - 35,000 100,000 - 70 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 15-155-99-00-9923 TRANSFER TO CITY-WIDE CAPITAL 96,000 - - - - - - - - Expenditures 452,490 276,141 573,860 395,012 1,378,456 608,112 652,868 683,269 509,385 Surplus(Deficit) 234,779 284,457 (119,313) 130,732 (434,456) (152,112) (197,368) (222,769) (48,885) Fund Balance 640,399 924,857 465,255 1,055,589 621,133 469,021 271,653 48,885 0 71 Municipal Building Fund (16) The Municipal Building Fund was used to maintain existing City owned buildings and to fund land acquisition,design and construction of new buildings. This fund is scheduled to be closed out in fiscal year 2014. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Licenses&Permits 20,700 8,400 5,250 9,150 - - - -Other Financing Sources - - - - 573,374 - - - - Total Revenue 20,700 8,400 5,250 9,150 573,374 - - - - Expenditures Contractual Services - 750 - 3,150 - - - - - Total Expenditures - 750 - 3,150 - - - - - Surplus(Deficit) 20,700 7,650 5,250 6,000 573,374 - - - - Ending Fund Balance (587,024) (579,374) (575,774) (573,374) - - - - - $0 Fund Balance ($200) 0 ($400) ($600) ($800) 72 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Municipal Building-16 16-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES 20,700 7,650 5,250 6,000 16-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMITS - 750 - 3,150 - 16-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL - - - - 573,374 Revenue 20,700 8,400 5,250 9,150 573,374 - - 16-160-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM 750 3,150 Expenditures - 750 - 3,150 - - - - - Surplus(Deficit) 20,700 7,650 5,250 6,000 573,374 - - - Fund Balance (587,024) (579,374) (575,774) (573,374) - - - 73 City-Wide Capital Fund(23) The City-Wide Capital fund is used to maintain existing and construct new public infrastructure,and to fund other improvements that benefit the public. The Municipal Building fund was consolidated into this fund in fiscal year 2014. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Intergovernmental 64,000 - 231,000 - 327,600 93,760 218,200 147,160 512,720 Licenses&Permits 25,100 92,417 53,400 62,620 20,250 20,250 20,250 20,250 20,250 Charges for Service - - - - 669,120 669,120 669,120 669,120 669,120 Investment Earnings 19 114 250 250 500 250 100 - Reimbursements 1,200 9,586 - - - - - Miscellaneous - - - 13,500 126,441 - - - Other Financing Sources 231,484 125,000 1,019,332 754,332 435,401 4,750,000 - 1,798,213 643,477 Total Revenue 321,803 227,117 1,303,732 830,702 1,579,062 5,533,630 907,820 2,634,843 1,845,567 Expenditures Contractual Services 5,740 14,780 100,000 144,220 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Capital Outlay 172,033 6,793 940,500 394,241 1,287,000 1,351,400 4,763,000 2,407,840 1,372,278 Debt Service 125,000 125,000 - - 83,333 83,333 414,887 416,998 418,038 Other Financing Uses - - - - 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 Total Expenditures 302,773 146,573 1,040,500 538,461 1,425,583 1,489,983 5,233,137 2,880,088 1,845,566 Surplus(Deficit) 19,030 80,544 263,232 292,241 153,479 4,043,647 (4,325,317) (245,245) 1 Municipal Building Fund Balance - - - - - - - - City-Wide Capital Fund Balance 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 Ending Fund Balance 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 N $6,000 Fund Balance r m $4,000 3 t $2,000 H $0 ($2,000) 74 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected City-Wide Capital-23 23-00041-00-4176 STATE GRANTS-SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL 231,000 280,000 - - - 23-00041-00-4178 STATE GRANTS-ITEP KENNEDY RD TRAIL - - 47,600 73,960 7,000 114,160 12,720 23-000-41-00-4179 STATE GRANTS-DCEO TAP OLD JAIL 64,000 - - - - - 23-000-41-00-4181 STATE GRANTS-KKCOM STP GAME FARM - 19,800 211,200 33,000 - 23-000-41-00-4183 STATE GRANTS-ITEP DOWNTOWN - - - - - - - 500,000 23-000-42-00-4210 BUILDING PERMITS - 30,993 13,400 13,400 - 23-000-42-004213 ENGINEERING CAPITAL FEE 3,100 4,700 - - - - - - - 23-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES - 7,944 20,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 23-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMITS 14,780 - 44,220 - - - - - 23-000-42-00-4218 DEVELOPMENT FEES-MUNICIPAL BLDG - - - - 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 23-000-42-00-4222 ROAD CONTRIBUTION FEE 22,000 34,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 23-000-44-00-4440 ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE FEE - - - - 669,120 669,120 669,120 669,120 669,120 23-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 19 114 250 250 500 250 100 - 23-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 1,200 9,586 - - - - - 23-000-48-00-4860 PUSH FOR THE PATH PROCEEDS - - - 126,441 23-000-48-00-4880 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS 13,500 - - 23-000-49-00-4900 BOND PROCEEDS - - - 4,750,000 23-000-49-00-4905 LOAN PROCEEDS - - 600,000 335,000 165,000 - - - 23-00049-004901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 135,484 125,000 419,332 419,332 270,401 1,798,213 643,477 23-00049-004915 TRANSFER FROM MOTOR FUEL TAX 96,000 - - - - - - - Revenue 321,803 227,117 1,303,732 830,702 1,579,062 5,5339630 907,820 2,634,843 1,845,567 CW Municipal Building Expenditures 23-216-60-00-6020 BUILDINGS&STRUCTURES - - - - - - - - - 23-216-99-00-9901 TRANSFER TO GENERAL 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 75 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected City-Wide Capital Expenditures 23-230-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM - 14,780 - 44,220 23-230-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,740 - 100,000 100,000 - - - - - 23-230-54-00-5465 ENGINEERING SERVICES - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 23-230-60-00-6023 OLD JAIL PURCHASE 161,549 - - - - - - 23-230-60-00-6025 ROAD TO BETTER ROADS PROGRAM - 100,000 - 750,000 750,000 750,000 795,000 879,978 23-230-60-00-6041 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION 10,484 - 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 - 23-230-60-00-6048 DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE IMPROV - - - - 450,000 450,000 23-230-60-00-6058 ROUTE 71(RTE 47-ORCHARD RD)PROJECT - - 110,400 - - 23-230-60-00-6059 US 34(IL 47/ORCHARD RD)PROJECT - 230,200 - - 23-230-60-00-6073 GAME FARM ROAD PROJECT - - 20,000 261,000 3,876,100 770,000 23-230-60-00-6075 RIVER ROAD BRIDGE PROJECT - 600,000 335,000 165,000 - - - 23-230-60-00-6092 SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL PROJECT 6,793 231,000 25,255 280,000 - - - - 23-230-60-00-6094 KENNEDY RD BIKE TRAIL - 9,500 33,986 59,500 97,700 14,000 380,340 42,300 2015 Bond 23-230-81-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - - 200,000 180,000 185,000 23-230-81-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - 131,554 153,665 149,705 Kendall County Loan-River Road Bridge 23-230-97-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - 83,333 83,333 83,333 83,333 83,333 Clark Property 23-230-97-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 125,000 125,000 - - - - - 302,773 146,573 1,040,500 538,461 1,420,333 1,484,733 5,227,887 2,874,838 1,840,316 Expenditures 302,773 146,573 1,040,500 538,461 1,425,583 1,489,983 5,2339137 2,880,088 1,845,566 Surplus(Deficit) 19,030 80,544 263,232 2929241 153,479 4,043,647 (4,325,317) (245,245) 1 Fund Balance-Municipal Building - - - Fund Balance-City Wide Capital 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570.562 245,245 (0) 0 Fund Balance 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 76 Vehicle and Equipment Fund(25) This fund is new for fiscal year 2014,consolidating the Police Capital,Public Works Capital and Park&Recreation Capital funds. This fund primarily derives its revenue from monies collected from building permits and development fees. The revenue is used to purchase vehicles and equipment for use in the operations of the police,public works and parks departments. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Licenses&Permits 43,167 55,000 50,750 64,315 49,275 49,275 49,275 49,275 49,275 Fines&Forfeits 12,612 6,233 11,650 12,850 8,850 8,850 8,850 8,850 8,850 Charges for Service 4,897 6,040 20,000 5,632 150,150 113,451 136,087 136,087 136,086 Investment Earnings 99 405 300 520 475 475 475 475 475 Reimbursements 7,500 10,702 40,000 40,000 50,000 - - - - Miscellaneous 16,183 16,100 1,000 966 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Other Financing Sources - 3,500 2,500 2,500 - - - - - Total Revenue 84,458 97,980 126,200 126,783 259,750 173,051 195,687 195,687 195,686 Police Capital Expenditures Contractual Services 9,493 2,647 12,500 17,270 11,667 11,667 11,667 11,667 11,667 Supplies - - 2,500 - - - - - - Capital Outlay 43,772 - 45,000 139,641 93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 Sub-Total Expenditures 53,265 2,647 60,000 156,911 104,667 104,667 104,667 104,667 104,667 Public Works Capital Expenditures Contractual Services 49 10,076 10,500 21,402 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 Supplies - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Capital Outlay 4,000 - 75,000 75,000 30,000 - - - - Debt Service 82,295 82,295 82,295 82,295 79,795 79,795 79,795 79,795 79,795 Sub-Total Expenditures 86,344 92,371 169,795 180,697 118,295 88,295 88,295 88,295 88,295 Parks Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay 24,658 - 50,000 12,000 17,000 16,000 - - - Debt Service - - - - 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Other Financing Uses - 3,500 2,500 2,500 50,000 - - - - Sub-Total Expenditures 24,658 3,500 52,500 14,500 69,500 18,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total Expenditures 164,267 98,518 282,295 352,108 292,462 211,462 195,462 195,462 195,462 Surplus(Deficit) (79,809) (538) (156,095) (225,325) (32,712) (38,411) 225 225 224 Police Capital Fund Balance 194,947 229,238 104,737 101,427 22,635 (0) - 0 (0) Public Works Capital Fund Balance 108,743 62,884 (65,159) (62,855) 0 0 0 0 0 Parks Capital Fund Balance 51,443 62,473 22,545 90,698 73,923 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 Ending Fund Balance 355,133 354,595 62,123 129,270 96,558 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 N $400 Fund Balance $300 r $200 $100 $0 77 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Vehicle&Eauipment-25 25-00042-004215 DEVELOPMENT FEES-POLICE CAPITAL 16,009 15,450 10,500 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 25-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMITS - 3,500 - 15,040 - - - - - 25-000-42-00-4217 WEATHER WARNING SIREN FEES 408 - 6,000 - - - - - - 25-000-42-00-4218 ENGINEERING CAPITAL FEE - - 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 25-000-42-00-4219 DEVELOPMENT FEES-PW CAPITAL 25,100 33,450 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 25-000-42-00-4220 DEVELOPMENT FEES-PARK CAPITAL 1,650 2,600 3,250 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 25-000-43-00-4315 DUI FINES 6,462 3,116 6,000 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 25-000-43-004316 ELECTRONIC CITATION FEES 122 782 650 750 750 750 750 750 750 25-000-43-00-4340 SEIZED VEHICLE PROCEEDS 6,028 2,335 5,000 9,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25-000-44-00-4418 MOWING INCOME 4,897 6,040 20,000 5,632 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 25-000-44-00-4420 POLICE CHARGEBACK - - - - - 56,156 78,792 78,792 78,791 25-000-44-00-4421 PUBLIC WORKS CHARGEBACK - - - 144,650 51,795 51,795 51,795 51,795 25-000-45-00-4520 INVESTMENT EARNINGS-POLICE CAPITAL 55 50 50 25 25 25 25 25 25-000-45-00-4521 INVESTMENT EARNINGS-PW CAPITAL - 22 - 20 - - - - - 25-000-45-00-4522 INVESTMENT EARNINGS-PARK CAPITAL 99 328 250 450 450 450 450 450 450 25-000-46-00-4622 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS-PARK CAPITAL 7,500 10,702 40,000 40,000 50,000 - - - - 25-000-48-00-4882 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS-POLICE CAPITAL 8,900 15,200 1,000 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 25-00048-004883 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS-PARKS CAPITAL - 900 - - - - - - - 25-000-48-00-4852 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME-POLICE CAPITAL - - - 25-00048-00-4854 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME-PW CAPITAL 7,283 - - 766 25-00049-00-4922 TRANSFER FROM PARK&REC CAPITAL - 3,500 2,500 2,500 - - - - - Revenue 84,458 97,980 126,200 126,783 259,750 173,051 195,687 195,687 195,686 Police Capital 25-205-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,060 2,647 2,500 3,542 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 25-205-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 6,433 - 10,000 13,728 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 25-205-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - 2,500 - - - - - - 25-205-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT 1,462 20,000 100,190 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 25-205-60-00-6070 VEHICLES 42,310 - 25,000 39,451 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 53,265 2,647 60,000 156,911 104,667 104,667 104,667 104,667 104,667 78 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Public Works Capital 25-215-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM 3,500 - 15,040 - - - - 25-215-54-00-5448 FILING FEES 49 2,576 6,000 1,862 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 25-215-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 4,000 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 25-215-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 25-215-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT 4,000 75,000 75,000 - - - - - 25-215-60-00-6070 VEHICLES - - - - 30,000 - - - - 185 Wolf Street Building 25-215-92-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 26,544 28,254 30,074 30,074 31,040 33,039 35,168 37,433 39,846 25-215-92-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 55,751 54,041 52,221 52,221 48,755 46,756 44,627 42,362 39,949 86,344 92,371 169,795 180,697 118,295 889295 88,295 88,295 88,295 Parks&Recreation Capital 25-225-60-00-6035 RAINTREE PARK 9,002 - 10,000 - 5,000 - - - - 25-225-60-00-6042 BASEBALL FIELD CONSTRUCTION 15,656 - - - - 25-225-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT - 40,000 12,000 12,000 16,000 - - - 185 Wolf Street Building 25-225-92-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - 972 1,035 1,102 1,173 1,248 25-225-92-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - - 1,528 1,465 1,398 1,327 1,252 25-225-99-00-9921 TRANSFER TO PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL 3,500 2,500 2,500 - - - - - 25-225-99-00-9972 TRANSFER TO LAND CASH - - - - 50,000 - - - - 24,658 3,500 52,500 14,500 69,500 18,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Expenditures 164,267 98,518 282,295 352,108 292,462 211,462 195,462 195,462 1959462 Surplus(Deficit) (79,809) (538) (156,095) (225,325) (32,712) (38,411) 225 225 224 Fund Balance-Police Capital 194,947 229,238 104,737 101,427 22,635 (0) 0 (0) Fund Balance-Public Works Capital 108,743 62,884 (65,159) (62,855) 0 0 0 0 0 Fund Balance-Parks&Rec Capital 51,443 62,473 22,545 90,698 73,923 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 Fund Balance 3559133 354,595 62,123 129,270 96,558 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 79 Debt Service Fund (42) The Debt Service Fund accumulates monies for payment of the 2005A bonds,which were issued to finance road improvement projects. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes - 323,350 326,379 324,762 328,179 329,579 290,732 210,022 129,402 Licenses&Permits 1,025 1,375 1,000 3,969 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Investment Earnings - 283 300 350 300 300 300 300 300 Other Financing Sources 429,404 182,517 99,465 99,465 - - - 82,372 335,254 Total Revenue 430,429 507,525 427,144 428,546 329,479 330,879 292,032 293,694 465,956 Expenditures Contractual Services - 749 963 963 375 375 375 375 375 Debt Service 429,404 427,919 504,407 504,407 328,179 329,579 330,579 336,179 336,179 Total Expenditures 429,404 428,668 505,370 505,370 328,554 329,954 330,954 336,554 336,554 Surplus(Deficit) 1,025 78,857 (78,226) (76,824) 925 925 (38,922) (42,860) 129,402 Ending Fund Balance 8,653 87,510 8,925 10,686 11,611 12,536 (26,386) (69,246) 60,156 $100 Fund Balance N $50 N 3 t $0 r ($50) ($100) 80 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Debt Service-42 42-00040-004006 PROPERTY TAXES-2005A BOND - 323,350 326,379 324,762 328,179 329,579 290,732 210,022 129,402 42-00042-004208 RECAPTURE FEES-WATER&SEWER 1,025 1,375 1,000 3,969 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 42-00045-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - 283 300 350 300 300 300 300 300 42-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 429,404 103,740 99,465 99,465 - - - 82,372 335,254 42-000-49-00-4985 TRANSFER FROM FOX INDUSTRIAL TIF - 78,777 - - - - - - Revenue 430,429 507,525 427,144 428,546 329,479 330,879 292,032 293,694 465,956 42420-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES - 749 963 963 375 375 375 375 375 2004C Bond 42-420-81-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 - - - - - 42-420-81-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 12,825 8,740 4,465 4,465 - - - - - 2005A Bond 42-420-82-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 185,000 195,000 205,000 205,000 215,000 225,000 235,000 250,000 260,000 42-420-82-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 136,579 129,179 121,379 121,379 113,179 104,579 95,579 86,179 76,179 2002 Fox Industrial TIF Bond 421120-98-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - 75,000 75,000 - - - - - 42-420-98-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - 3,563 3,563 - - - - - Expenditures 429,404 428,668 505,370 505,370 328,554 329,954 330,954 336,554 336,554 Surplus(Deficit) 1,025 78,857 (78,226) (76,824) 925 925 (38,922) (42,860) 129,402 Fund Balance 8,653 87,510 8,925 10,686 11,611 12,536 (26,386) (69,246) 60,156 81 Water Fund(51) The Water Fund is an enterprise fund which is comprised of both a capital and operational budget.The capital portion is used for the improvement and expansion of water infrastructure, while the operational side is used to service and maintain City water systems. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes - 133,524 133,454 132,793 43,027 41,959 Licenses&Permits - 11,970 - 54,590 - - - - - Charges for Service 2,503,003 2,580,682 2,527,871 2,799,135 2,458,740 2,487,934 2,517,566 2,547,642 2,578,170 Investment Earnings 1,888 282 300 1,700 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 Reimbursements - 1,771 7,466 8,232 - - - - - Miscellaneous 40,793 43,106 50,000 53,073 54,336 55,632 56,963 58,329 59,731 Other Financing Sources 82,850 83,863 82,288 82,288 82,988 83,588 84,088 84,488 82,288 Total Revenue 2,628,534 2,855,198 2,801,379 3,131,811 2,641,090 2,671,612 2,661,616 2,693,959 2,724,188 Expenses Salaries 346,735 332,461 382,000 362,000 346,131 346,131 346,131 346,131 346,131 Benefits 57,450 56,284 219,720 208,468 191,042 202,285 214,593 223,343 232,617 Contractual Services 493,345 518,831 501,200 542,740 497,450 511,625 526,509 542,137 558,546 Supplies 264,325 267,849 294,124 291,926 301,873 298,734 301,795 305,071 308,576 Capital Outlay - 25,054 132,000 91,305 139,094 157,094 139,094 139,094 139,094 Developer Commitments 275,865 275,865 160,923 160,921 - - - - - Debt Service 834,453 903,277 1,396,016 1,396,016 1,172,802 1,168,384 1,163,054 1,166,825 1,154,236 Total Expenses 2,272,173 2,379,621 3,085,983 3,053,376 2,648,392 2,684,253 2,691,176 2,722,600 2,739,200 Surplus(Deficit) 356,361 475,577 (284,604) 78,435 (7,301) (12,641) (29,560) (28,642) (15,012) Ending Fund Balance Equivalent 825,261 1,300,837 642,452 1,379,272 1,371,971 1,3599330 1,329,770 19301,128 1,286,117 36.32% 54.67% 20.82% 45.17% 51.80% 50.64% 49.41% 47.79% 46.95% N $1,500 Fund Balance Equivalent 3 $1,000 0 s ~ $500 $0 82 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Water-51 51-000-40-00-4007 PROPERTY TAXES-2007A BOND 133,524 133,454 132,793 43,027 41,959 51-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMITS - 11,970 - 54,590 - - - - 51-000-44-00-4424 WATER SALES 1,698,753 1,751,822 1,699,871 1,922,239 1,946,267 1,975,461 2,005,093 2,035,169 2,065,697 51-00044-00-4425 BULK WATER SALES 882 329 500 10,796 500 500 500 500 500 51-000-44-00-4426 LATE PENALTIES-WATER - - - 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 51-000-44-00-4430 WATER METER SALES 22,040 25,365 26,250 26,250 27,563 27,563 27,563 27,563 27,563 51-000-44-00-4440 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE FEE 685,188 696,716 675,000 690,000 334,560 334,560 334,560 334,560 334,560 51-000-44-00-4450 WATER CONNECTION FEES 96,140 106,450 126,250 59,850 59,850 59,850 59,850 59,850 59,850 51-000-44-00-4473 RECAPTURE FEES - - - - - - - - - 51-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1,888 282 300 1,700 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 51-00046-00-4670 REIMB-EMPLOYEE INS CONTRIBUTIONS - - 7,225 7,872 - - - - - 51-000-46-00-4671 REIMB-LIFE INSURANCE - 241 160 51-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS - 1,771 - 200 - - - - - 51-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 32,038 39,491 50,000 53,073 54,336 55,632 56,963 58,329 59,731 51-000-48-00-4821 BAD DEBT RECOVERY 4,437 3,517 - - - - - - - 51-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 4,318 98 - - - - - - - 51-000-49-00-4952 TRANSFER FROM SEWER 82,850 83,863 82,288 82,288 82,988 83,588 84,088 84,488 82,288 Revenue 2,628,534 2,855,198 2,8019379 3,1319811 2,641,090 2,671,612 29661,616 2,693,959 2,724,188 Water Operations 51-510-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 342,790 324,679 370,000 350,000 334,131 334,131 334,131 334,131 334,131 51-510-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 3,945 7,782 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 51-510-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 32,128 31,777 39,852 39,852 38,361 38,361 38,361 38,361 38,361 51-510-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 25,322 24,507 28,200 28,200 25,769 25,769 25,769 25,769 25,769 51-510-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 103,966 103,966 90,661 99,727 109,700 116,282 123,259 51-510-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1,210 1,000 750 758 765 773 780 51-510-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 7,201 6,700 6,166 6,783 7,461 7,909 8,383 51-510-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 829 750 825 908 998 1,058 1,122 51-510-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 6,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 51-510-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE 32,462 24,000 24,510 25,981 27,539 29,192 30,943 83 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 51-510-54-00-5401 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGEBACK 91,863 91,863 - 51-510-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM - 11,970 - 54,590 - - - - - 51-510-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 1,842 330 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 51-510-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 390 287 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 51-510-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 934 1,172 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 51-510-54-00-5429 WATER SAMPLES 10,265 4,294 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 51-510-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING 1,164 86 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 51-510-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 15,598 19,205 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 51-510-54-00-5445 TREATMENT FACILITY SERVICES 64,626 85,003 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 51-510-54-00-5448 FILING FEES 4,123 5,888 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 51-510-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 16,716 17,167 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 51-510-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 899 629 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 51-510-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,695 9,755 8,800 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 51-510-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 51-510-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 262,977 239,606 299,250 270,000 283,500 297,675 312,559 328,187 344,596 51-510-54-00-5483 JULIE SERVICES 2,422 3,426 3,500 3,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 51-510-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 396 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 51-510-54-00-5490 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 3,855 12,832 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 51-510-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES 1,552 1,552 1,600 1,600 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 51-510-54-00-5499 BAD DEBT 10,424 13,370 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 51-510-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 2,206 3,045 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 51-510-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 21,468 16,036 21,425 21,425 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 51-510-56-00-5628 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - - - - 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 51-510-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 412 459 4,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 51-510-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 338 560 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 51-510-56-00-5638 TREATMENT FACILITY SUPPLIES 176,762 177,643 165,000 165,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 51-510-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 995 7,368 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 51-510-56-00-5664 METERS&PARTS 32,136 29,092 46,000 46,000 52,000 46,000 46,000 46,000 46,000 51-510-56-00-5695 GASOLINE 30,008 33,646 38,199 36,001 40,873 43,734 46,795 50,071 53,576 51-510-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT - - 16,000 16,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 51-510-60-00-6070 VEHICLES - - - - 18,000 - - - 51-510-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - 25,054 116,000 75,305 129,094 129,094 129,094 129,094 129,094 84 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 51-510-75-00-7502 GRANDE RESERVE COURT ORDER 275,865 275,865 160,923 160,921 - - - - Debt Service-2007A Bond 51-510-83-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 51-510-83-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 124,266 123,866 123,454 123,454 123,041 122,423 121,793 121,163 120,525 Debt Service-2002 Capital Appreciation Debt Certificates 51-510-85-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 215,000 285,000 365,000 365,000 - - - - - 51-510-85-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - - - - - - - - Debt Service-2003 Debt Certificates 51-510-86-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 51-510-86-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 33,150 33,150 33,150 33,150 33,150 29,350 25,450 21,450 17,300 Debt Service-2006A Refunding Debt Certificates 51-510-87-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 70,000 70,000 355,000 355,000 405,000 420,000 435,000 460,000 475,000 51-510-87-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 91,306 88,506 219,806 219,806 205,606 189,406 172,606 155,206 136,806 Debt Service-2005C Bond 51-510-88-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 85,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 110,000 51-510-88-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 80,700 77,725 74,575 74,575 70,975 67,175 63,175 58,975 54,575 Debt Service-IEPA Loan L17-156300 51-510-89-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 83,500 85,600 87,754 87,754 89,961 92,224 94,544 96,923 99,361 51-510-89-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 41,531 39,430 37,277 37,277 35,069 32,806 30,486 28,108 25,669 Expenses 2,272,173 2,379,621 3,085,983 3,053,376 2,648,392 2,684,253 2,691,176 2,722,600 2,739,200 Surplus(Deficit) 356,361 475,577 (284,604) 78,435 (7,301) (12,641) (29,560) (28,642) (15,012) Fund Balance Equiv 825,261 1,300,837 642,452 1,379,272 1,3719971 1,359,330 1,329,770 1,301,128 1,286,117 36.32% 54.67% 20.82% 45.17% 51.80% 50.64% 49.41% 47.79% 46.95% 85 Sewer Fund(52) The Sewer Fund is an enterprise fund which is comprised of both a capital and operational budget. The capital portion is used for improvement and expansion of the sanitary sewer infrastructure while the operational side allows the City to service and maintain sanitary sewer systems. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes - 1,750,206 263,850 262,543 114,940 - Licenses&Permits - 4,000 - 18,000 - - - - - Charges for Service 1,471,981 1,362,022 1,368,380 1,347,769 1,097,560 1,097,560 1,097,560 1,097,560 1,097,560 Investment Earnings 1,517 2,405 3,000 6,200 5,500 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,500 Reimbursements 4,576 1,741 4,587 8,740 - - - - - Other Financing Sources - - - - 1,137,220 1,133,972 1,134,654 1,134,052 1,137,166 Total Revenue 1,478,074 3,120,374 1,639,817 1,643,252 2,355,220 2,237,032 2,237,214 2,236,112 2,239,226 Expenses Salaries 241,621 198,218 212,000 212,000 192,000 192,000 192,000 192,000 192,000 Benefits 40,046 33,563 132,802 126,492 111,144 117,730 124,936 130,100 135,574 Contractual Services 135,927 140,460 73,400 102,400 80,950 83,943 86,785 90,084 93,548 Supplies 51,419 45,381 65,711 69,673 83,206 87,792 92,687 97,915 101,203 Capital Outlay - 25,054 60,000 38,951 66,773 96,773 66,773 66,773 66,773 Developer Commitments 30,996 30,996 180,996 30,996 - - - - - Debt Service 1,252,597 1,416,416 1,088,013 1,088,013 1,968,119 2,054,461 1,865,399 1,865,857 1,877,110 Other Financing Uses 82,850 604,582 82,288 82,288 82,988 83,588 84,088 84,488 82,288 Total Expenses 1,835,456 2,494,670 1,895,210 1,750,812 2,585,179 2,716,285 2,512,666 2,527,216 2,548,495 Surplus(Deficit) (357,382) 625,704 (255,393) (107,560) (229,959) (479,253) (275,452) (291,104) (309,269) Ending Fund Balance Equivalent 2,377,831 3,003,537 2,625,761 2,895,977 2,666,019 2,186,765 1,911,313 1,620,209 1,310,940 129.55% 120.40% 138.55% 165.41% 103.13% 80.51% 76.07% 64.11% 51.44% r $4,000 Fund Balance Equivalent m $3,000 ° $2,000 $1,000 $0 86 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Sewer-52 52-000-40-00-4009 PROPERTY TAXES-2004B BOND 257,989 263,850 262,543 114,940 52-000-40-00-4013 PROPERTY TAXES-2005D BOND 1,382,408 - - - 52-000-40-00-4014 PROPERTY TAXES-2008 BOND 109,809 - 52-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMITS 4,000 - 18,000 - - - - 52-000-44-00-4435 SEWER MAINTENANCE FEES 731,743 742,022 728,280 741,255 740,000 740,000 740,000 740,000 740,000 52-000-44-00-4440 SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE FEE - - - - 334,560 334,560 334,560 334,560 334,560 52-000-44-00-4455 SW CONNECTION FEES-OPERATIONS 4,000 4,800 5,100 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 52-000-44-00-4456 SW CONNECTION FEES-CAPITAL 38,000 43,200 35,000 7,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 52-000-44-00-4457 SW CONNECTION FEES-ROB ROY 698,000 572,000 600,000 586,000 - - - - - 52-000-44-00-4462 LATE PENALTIES-SEWER - - - 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 52-000-44-00-4465 RIVER CROSSING FEES 238 514 - - - - - 52-000-44-00-4473 RECAPTURE FEES - - - - - - - - - 52-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1,517 2,405 3,000 6,200 5,500 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,500 52-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMPLOYEE INS CONTRIBUTIONS - - 4,587 4,637 - - - - - 52-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 4,576 1,741 - 4,103 - - - - - 52-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL - - - - 1,137,220 1,133,972 1,134,654 1,134,052 1,137,166 Revenue 1,478,074 3,120,374 1,639,817 1,643,252 2,355,220 2,237,032 2,237,214 2,236,112 2,239,226 Sewer Operations 52-520-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 241,173 198,017 210,000 210,000 190,000 190,000 190,000 190,000 190,000 52-520-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 448 201 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 52-520-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 22,383 18,927 21,290 21,290 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 52-520-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 17,663 14,636 18,000 18,000 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 52-520-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 63,595 63,595 51,500 56,650 62,315 66,054 70,017 52-520-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 537 537 425 429 434 438 442 52-520-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 4,687 4,687 4,240 4,664 5,130 5,438 5,765 52-520-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 532 532 475 523 575 609 646 52-520-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 2,571 2,100 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 52-520-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE - - 21,590 15,750 16,004 16,964 17,982 19,061 20,205 52-520-54-00-5401 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGEBACK 83,045 83,045 - - - - - - - 87 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 52-520-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM 4,000 - 18,000 - - - - - 52-520-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 52-520-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 52-520-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING - - 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 52-520-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1,399 1,699 1,800 1,800 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 52-520-54-00-5444 LIFT STATION SERVICES 5,623 16,541 15,000 15,000 15,750 16,538 17,364 18,233 19,144 52-520-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,022 5,960 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 52-520-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 21,071 19,782 42,000 42,000 44,100 46,305 48,620 51,051 53,604 52-520-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 396 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 52-520-54-00-5490 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 4,908 3,997 4,000 12,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 52-520-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES - 2,511 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,700 2,700 2,700 52-520-54-00-5499 BAD DEBT 15,859 2,529 - 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 52-520-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 1,830 2,753 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 52-520-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,072 519 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 52-520-56-00-5613 LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE 4,747 1,312 10,000 10,000 10,500 11,025 11,576 12,155 12,763 52-520-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,891 3,690 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 52-520-56-00-5628 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - - - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 52-520-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 1,354 781 4,500 4,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 52-520-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 879 77 3,000 3,000 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 52-520-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 10,954 5,246 10,000 10,000 26,750 28,623 30,626 32,770 32,770 52-520-56-00-5695 GASOLINE 28,692 31,003 29,211 33,173 31,256 33,444 35,785 38,290 40,970 52-520-60-00-6070 VEHICLES - - - - - 30,000 - - - 52-520-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - 25,054 60,000 38,951 66,773 66,773 66,773 66,773 66,773 52-520-75-00-7500 LENNAR-RAINTREE SEWER RECPATURE 30,996 30,996 30,996 30,996 - - - - - 52-520-75-00-7501 WINDETT RIDGE-SEWER RECAPTURE - - 150,000 - - - - - - Debt Service-2004B Bond 52-520-84-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 155,000 160,000 170,000 170,000 280,000 375,000 395,000 410,000 435,000 52-520-84-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 103,300 98,650 93,850 93,850 88,750 78,950 65,825 52,000 35,600 Debt Service-2003 IRBB Debt Certificates 52-520-90-00.8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 90,000 95,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 52-520-90-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 73,653 70,143 66,248 66,248 62,048 57,648 52,870 47,755 42,293 Debt Service-2004A Bond 88 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 52-520-91-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 160,000 170,000 175,000 175,000 180,000 190,000 52-520-91-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 28,573 24,093 18,738 18,738 13,050 6,840 - - - Debt Service-2011 Refunding Bond 52-520-92-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - 660,000 685,000 715,000 745,000 780,000 52-520-92-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 225,354 318,147 318,147 477,220 448,972 419,654 389,052 357,166 Debt Service-2005D Bond 52-520-93-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - - - - - - 52-520-93-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 385,950 332,346 Debt Service-2008 Refunding Bond 52-520-94-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - 52-520-94-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 110,090 94,800 - - Debt Service-IEPA Loan L17-013000 52-520-95-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 35,357 36,635 37,958 37,958 52-520-95-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 3,623 2,345 1,022 1,022 - - - - - Debt Service-IEPA Loan L17-115300 52-520-96-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 84,107 86,329 88,610 88,610 90,952 93,355 95,821 98,353 100,952 52-520-96-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 22,944 20,721 18,440 18,440 16,099 13,696 11,229 8,697 6,099 52-520-99-00-9951 TRANSFER TO WATER 82,850 83,863 82,288 82,288 82,988 83,588 84,088 84,488 82,288 52-520-99-00-9999 TRANSFER TO 2011 BOND ESCROW - 520,719 - - - - - - - Expenses 1,835,456 2,494,670 1,895,210 1,750,812 2,585,179 2,716,285 2,512,666 2,527,216 2,548,495 Surplus(Deficit) (357,382) 625,704 (255,393) (107,560) (229,959) (479,253) (2759452) (291,104) (309,269) Fund Balance Equiv 29377,831 3,003,537 2,625,761 2,895,977 2,666,019 29186,765 1,911,313 1,620,209 1,310,940 129.55% 120.40% 138.55% 165.41% 103.13% 80.51% 76.07% 64.11% 51.44% 89 Land Cash Fund (72) Land-Cash funds are dedicated by developers through the contribution ordinance to serve the immediate and future needs of park and recreation of residents in new subdivisions.Land for park development and cash spent on recreational facilities is often matched through grant funding to meet the community's recreation needs at a lower cost to the City. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Intergovernmental 42,285 400,000 400,000 400,000 96,000 - - 400,000 - Land Cash Contributions 432,354 30,767 20,500 52,106 20,500 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Other Financing Sources - - - - 50,000 - - - - Total Revenue 474,639 430,767 420,500 452,106 166,500 23,000 23,000 423,000 23,000 Expenditures Contractual Services 60,449 20,084 - - - - - - - Capital Outlay 197,470 316,836 323,825 72,247 89,000 356,850 263,000 13,000 63,000 Total Expenditures 257,919 336,920 323,825 72,247 89,000 356,850 263,000 13,000 63,000 Surplus(Deficit) 216,720 93,847 96,675 379,859 77,500 (333,850) (240,000) 410,000 (40,000) Ending Fund Balance (388,625) (294,778) (172,534) 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) Fund Balance $200 r H $0 3 F ($200) ($400) ($600) 90 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Land Cash-72 72-000-41-00-4170 STATE GRANTS 42,285 - 72-000-41-00-4171 OSLAD GRANT-PRAIRIE MEADOWS - 400,000 - - 72-00041-004173 OSLAD GRANT-RAINTREE - 400,000 400,000 - 72-00041-004174 RTP GRANT-CLARK PARK - - 96,000 - 72-000-41-004175 OSLAD GRANT-RIVERFRONT GRANT - 400,000 72-000-47-00-4701 WHITE OAK UNIT 3&4 - - 72-000-47-00-4702 WHISPERING MEADOWS(K HILL) 312,655 - - - - - - - 72-000-47-00-4703 AUTUMN CREEK 18,460 30,767 20,000 50,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 72-000-47-00-4704 BLACKBERRY WOODS 568 - 500 568 500 500 500 500 500 72-000-47-00-4705 BRISTOL BAY 100,000 - - - - - - - 72-000-47-00-4706 CALEDONIA - 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 72-000-47-00-4707 RIVER'S EDGE 671 - - - - - - 72-000-47-00-4708 COUNTRY HILLS - 1,538 72-000-49-00-4925 TRANSFER FROM VEHICLE&EQUIPMENT - - - - 50,000 - - - - Revenue 474,639 430,767 420,500 452,106 166,500 23,000 23,000 4239000 23,000 72-720-54-00-5401 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGEBACK 60,449 20,084 - - - - - - - 72-720-60-00-6032 MOSIER HOLDING COSTS 10,000 11,000 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 72-720-60-00-6036 RAINTREE VILLAGE 88,175 305,836 191,825 40,247 - - - - - 72-720-60-00-6038 WHEATON WOODS NATURE TRAIL 213 - - - 72-720-60-00-6039 BRISTOL BAY-PARK A 85,062 72-720-60-00-6043 BRISTOL BAY REGIONAL PARK 14,020 - - - 72-720-60-00-6044 CLARK PARK - 120,000 20,000 76,000 - - 72-720-60-00-6045 RIVERFRONT PARK - - - 200,000 200,000 72-720-60-00-6046 GRANDE RESERVE PARK A - 50,000 72-720-60-00-6047 GRANDE RESERVE PARK B 143,850 - 91 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 72-720-60-00-6049 RAINTREE PARK C - - - - - - - - 50,000 Expenditures 257,919 336,920 323,825 72,247 89,000 356,850 263,000 13,000 63,000 Surplus(Deficit) 216,720 93,847 96,675 379,859 77,500 (333,850) (240,000) 410,000 (40,000) Fund Balance (388,625) (294,778) (172,534) 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) 92 Parks and Recreation Fund (79) This fund accounts for the daily operations of the Parks and Recreation Department. Programs,classes,special events and maintenance of City wide park land and public facilities make up the day to day operations. Programs and classes consist of a wide variety of options serving children through senior citizens. Special events range from Music Under the Stars to Home Town Days. City wide maintenance consists of over two hundred acres at more than fifty sites including buildings,boulevards,parks,utility locations and natural areas. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Charges for Service 220,962 265,699 220,000 248,500 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 Investment Earnings 301 175 200 250 200 200 200 200 200 Reimbursements 7,329 3,336 11,661 12,265 - - - - - Miscellaneous 186,780 193,688 263,700 202,235 223,000 223,000 223,000 223,000 232,700 Other Financing Sources 951,890 736,710 955,886 955,886 1,765,504 1,110,111 1,192,708 1,217,069 1,229,444 Total Revenue 1,367,262 1,199,608 1,451,447 1,419,136 2,228,704 1,573,311 1,655,908 1,680,269 1,702,344 Expenditures Salaries 687,511 651,906 702,800 665,800 782,469 783,969 785,544 787,198 788,934 Benefits 109,114 107,010 296,477 302,766 332,398 352,014 373,590 387,836 402,936 Contractual Services 126,382 147,598 177,530 161,630 227,280 222,530 196,993 201,678 206,598 Supplies 237,847 244,584 329,960 275,962 291,650 293,358 295,186 297,141 299,233 Other Financing Uses - - - - 556,957 - - - - Total Expenditures 1,160,854 1,151,098 1,506,767 1,406,158 2,190,754 1,651,871 1,651,312 1,673,853 1,697,702 Surplus(Deficit) 206,408 48,510 (55,320) 12,978 37,950 (78,560) 4,596 6,416 4,642 Ending Fund Balance 231,558 280,065 185,635 293,043 330,993 252,433 257,029 263,445 268,088 19.95% 24.33% 12.32% 20.84% 15.11% 15.28% 15.57% 15.74% 15.79% $400 Fund Balance m $300 =2 $200 $100 $0 93 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Parks and Recreation-79 79-00044-00-4402 SPECIAL EVENTS 6,935 18,095 33,500 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 79-000-44-00-4403 CHILD DEVELOPMENT 41,756 58,810 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 79-000-44-00-4404 ATHLETICS&FITNESS - 124,164 113,095 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 79-000-44-00-4439 PROGRAM FEES 189,890 53,905 - - - - - - - 79-00044-004441 CONCESSION REVENUE 31,072 38,939 30,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 79-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 301 175 200 250 200 200 200 200 200 79-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMPLOYEE INS CONTRIBUTIONS - - 11,661 12,265 - - - - - 79-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 7,329 3,336 - - - - - - - 79-00048-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 22,471 54,240 48,000 50,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 79-000-48-00-4825 PARK RENTALS - 27,143 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 79-000-48-00-4843 HOMETOWN DAYS 137,142 100,960 175,000 119,235 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 79-000-48-004846 SPONSORSHIPS&DONATIONS 7,445 4,314 14,700 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 14,700 79-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 19,722 7,031 1,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 79-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 951,890 736,710 955,886 955,886 1,765,504 1,110,111 1,192,708 1,217,069 1,229,444 Revenue 1,367,262 1,199,608 1,451,447 1,419,136 2,228,704 19573,311 1,655,908 1,680,269 1,702,344 Parks Department 79-790-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 355,091 369,514 410,000 400,000 434,602 434,602 434,602 434,602 434,602 79-790-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 15,969 16,833 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 79-790-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 439 50 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 79-790-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRI3UTION 32,914 35,461 43,693 43,693 48,498 48,498 48,498 48,498 48,498 79-790-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 27,503 28,869 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 79-790-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 126,842 126,842 111,307 122,438 134,681 142,762 151,328 79-790-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1,208 1,208 1,000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 79-790-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 9,179 9,179 10,232 11,255 12,381 13,124 13,911 79-790-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - 1,104 1,104 1,104 1,214 1,336 1,416 1,501 79-790-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 309 2,604 2,600 2,600 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 79-790-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 332 750 750 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 79-790-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1,802 3,330 3,780 3,780 4,780 4,780 4,780 4,780 4,780 94 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 79-790-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,323 4,748 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 79-790-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES 1,749 3,701 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 79-790-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 188 2,017 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 79-790-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - - 17,500 17,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 79-790-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 4,031 4,123 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 79-790-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152 293 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 79-790-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 11,232 23,528 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 79-790-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 1,785 2,374 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 79-790-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 79-790-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 44,231 51,312 50,500 50,500 50,500 50,500 50,500 50,500 50,500 79-790-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - - 20,000 20,000 21,400 22,898 24,501 26,216 28,051 500,718 5499089 781,806 771,806 806,573 820,345 835,449 846,078 857,362 Recreation Department 79-795-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 248,541 197,710 185,000 200,000 245,067 245,067 245,067 245,067 245,067 79-795-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 12,708 17,013 25,000 10,500 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 79-795-50-00-5020 OVERTIME - - 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 79-795-50-00-5045 CONCESSION WAGES 9,021 11,542 12,500 10,000 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 79-795-50-00-5046 PRE-SCHOOL WAGES 23,085 22,476 25,000 15,000 30,000 31,500 33,075 34,729 36,465 79-795-50-00-5052 INSTRUCTORS WAGES 22,657 16,768 25,000 10,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 79-795-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 24,798 23,137 19,884 24,300 27,300 27,300 27,300 27,300 27,300 79-795-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 23,899 19,543 16,000 18,034 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 79-795-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 41,094 41,094 67,943 74,737 82,211 87,144 92,372 79-795-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 473 450 600 606 612 618 624 79-795-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 2,675 2,566 4,839 5,323 5,855 6,207 6,579 79-795-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - 325 296 575 633 696 737 782 79-795-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 680 581 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 79-795-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 369 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 79-795-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 27,872 27,026 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 79-795-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 5,517 2,847 4,300 3,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 79-795-54-00-5447 SCHOLARSHIPS 221 685 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 79-795-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 7,006 3,128 8,000 2,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 95 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 79-795-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 482 1,375 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 79-795-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 49,076 73,265 60,000 60,000 65,000 68,250 71,663 75,246 79,008 79-795-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 21,229 9,538 23,100 15,000 20,000 21,000 22,050 23,153 24,310 79-795-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 2,459 2,558 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 79-795-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 1,387 106 1,000 500 40,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 79-795-54-00-5496 PROGRAM REFUNDS 3,082 9,388 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 79-795-54-00-5497 PROPERTY TAX PAYMENT - - - - - 30,000 - - - 79-795-56-00-5602 HOMETOWN DAYS SUPPLIES 99,903 84,982 140,000 91,712 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 79-795-56-00-5606 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 47,154 47,065 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 79-795-56-00-5607 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 17,834 19,144 18,000 15,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 79-795-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,466 1,792 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 79-795-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 4,138 6,533 5,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 79-795-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 283 - 2,000 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 79-795-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 2,600 1,522 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 79-795-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 412 920 2,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 79-795-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS - - 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 79-795-56-00-5690 SUPPLIES-GRANT REIMBURSABLE - - 500 - - - - - - 79-795-56-00-5695 GASOLINE 1,626 996 3,210 1,500 3,000 3,210 3,435 3,675 3,932 79-795-99-00-9980 TRANSFER TO RECREATION CENTER - - - - 556,957 - - - - 660,136 602,009 724,961 634,352 1,384,181 831,526 815,863 827,775 840,340 Expenditures 1,160,854 19151,098 1,506,767 1,406,158 2,190,754 1,651,871 1,651,312 1,673,853 1,697,702 Surplus(Deficit) 206,408 48,510 (55,320) 12,978 37,950 (789560) 4,596 6,416 4,642 Fund Balance 231,558 280,065 185,635 293,043 330,993 252,433 257,029 263,445 268,088 19.95% 24.33% 12.32% 20.84% 15.11% 15.28% 15.57% 15.74% 15.79% 96 Recreation Center Fund (80) The REC Center is a 38,000 square foot,full-service fitness and recreation facility leased by the City and operated by the Parks and Recreation Department. This fund is scheduled to be closed out in fiscal year 2014. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Charges for Service 608,154 620,489 607,000 498,750 61,000 - - - - Miscellaneous 11,864 14,074 15,500 14,456 - - - - - Other Financing Sources - - - - 556,957 - - - - Total Revenue 620,018 634,563 622,500 513,206 617,957 - - - - Expenses Salaries 224,988 201,757 223,000 174,250 20,000 - - - - Benefits 28,603 25,706 29,212 29,179 - - - - - Contractual Services 384,218 392,972 408,250 476,050 114,250 - - - - Supplies 49,451 39,041 43,171 81,194 16,239 - - - - Total Expenses 687,260 659,476 703,633 760,673 150,489 - - - - Surplus(Deficit) (67,242) (24,913) (81,133) (247,467) 467,468 - - - - Ending Fund Balance Equivalent (195,087) (220,001) (367,521) (467,468) 0 0 0 0 0 -28.39% -33.36% -52.23% -61.45% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Fund Balance Equivalent r $200 M $0 0 ($200) ($400) ($600) 97 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Recreation Center 80-000-44-00-4439 PROGRAM FEES 130,565 97,070 100,000 60,000 - 80-000-44-00-4441 CONCESSION REVENUE 14,692 10,661 12,500 6,500 500 80-000-44-00-4444 MEMBERSHIP FEES 418,685 465,488 450,000 400,000 60,000 80-000-44-00-4445 GUEST FEES 7,072 8,939 7,000 6,500 500 80-000-44-00-4446 SWIM CLASS FEES 27,013 30,932 25,000 20,000 - 80-000-44-00-4447 PERSONAL TRAINING FEES 8,055 4,910 10,000 5,000 80-000-44-00-4448 TANNING SESSION FEES 2,072 2,489 2,500 750 80-000-48-004820 RENTAL INCOME 7,103 13,017 13,000 13,000 80-000-48-004846 SCHOLARSHIPS&DONATIONS 3,170 760 2,000 1,356 80-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 1,591 297 500 100 - 80-000-49-00-4979 TRANSFER FROM PARKS&REC - - - - 556,957 Revenue 620,018 634,563 622,500 513,206 617,957 - - - - 80-800-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 33,542 29,087 28,000 26,250 - 80-800-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 96,666 88,234 100,000 78,000 20,000 80-800-50-00-5046 PRE-SCHOOL WAGES 38,362 30,255 35,000 15,000 - 80-800-50-00-5052 INSTRUCTORS WAGES 56,418 54,181 60,000 55,000 80-800-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 11,529 10,213 10,181 10,181 80-800-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 17,074 15,493 17,708 17,708 80-800-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 1,200 1,200 80-800-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 123 90 80-800-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE - - 80-800-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 80-800-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - - 80-800-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - - 200 80-800-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 732 192 1,500 - - 80-800-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 4,349 3,198 3,600 3,600 720 80-800-54-00-5447 SCHOLARSHIPS 389 - - - - 80-800-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING - - 600 300 60 80-800-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 114 200 200 40 98 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 80-800-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32,851 15,810 20,000 15,000 3,000 80-800-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 55,117 46,030 55,650 55,650 11,130 80-800-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 215,000 223,647 236,000 330,000 38,000 80-800-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 13,627 37,751 15,000 7,000 1,400 80-800-54-00-5496 PROGRAM REFUNDS 8,473 4,727 5,500 5,500 1,100 80-800-54-00-5497 PROPERTY TAX PAYMENT 53,680 61,503 70,000 58,800 58,800 80-800-56-00-5606 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 11,676 12,125 15,000 7,500 1,500 80-800-56-00-5607 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 10,029 6,302 7,000 7,000 1,400 80-800-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,730 892 2,600 1,500 300 80-800-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 4,543 7,039 6,200 3,000 600 80-800-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 8,525 - - - - 80-800-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 3,180 1,000 1,000 1,000 200 80-800-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 9,768 11,371 11,000 61,000 12,200 80-800-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS - 30 50 194 39 80-800-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - 282 321 - - Expenses 687,260 659,476 703,633 760,673 150,489 - - - - Surplus(Deficit) (67,242) (24,913) (81,133) (247,467) 467,468 - - - - Fund Balance Equiv (195,087) (220,001) (367,521) (467,468) 0 0 0 0 0 -28.39% -33.36% -52.23% -61.45% - 99 Library Operations Fund(82) The Yorkville Public Library provides the people of the community,from pre-school through maturity,with access to a collection of books and other materials which will serve their educational,cultural and recreational needs. The Library board and staff strive to provide the community an environment that promotes the love of reading. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 1,252,191 692,476 707,500 691,905 670,415 700,000 700,000 700,000 725,000 Intergovernmental 24,410 22,212 22,200 23,852 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 Licenses&Permits 17,650 4,681 - - - - - - - Fines&Forfeits 14,161 12,864 13,000 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 Charges for Service 17,117 15,368 17,000 13,450 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Investment Earnings 690 393 150 1,260 1,300 1,300 1,500 1,500 1,500 Reimbursements - - 7,306 9,396 - - - - - Miscellaneous 7,823 15,045 8,500 8,940 9,250 9,250 9,250 9,250 9,250 Other Financing Sources - 332,500 41,978 30,000 52,174 32,375 34,168 36,068 38,082 Total Revenue 1,334,042 1,095,539 817,634 788,103 778,639 788,425 790,418 792,318 819,332 Expenditures Salaries 501,353 432,008 440,000 440,000 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 Benefits 143,220 149,612 218,553 200,412 190,977 202,485 215,076 224,105 233,675 Contractual Services 149,678 88,124 111,599 108,149 109,049 109,679 110,341 111,035 111,764 Supplies 180,831 21,623 21,750 22,750 21,250 21,250 21,250 21,250 21,250 Contingencies 6,705 158 1,000 - - - - - - Debt Service 605,925 - - - Other Financing Uses - 332,519 1,511 5,469 - - - - - Total Expenditures 1,587,712 1,0249044 794,413 776,780 7689816 7809954 794,206 803,930 814,230 Surplus(Deficit) (253,670) 71,495 23,221 11,323 9,823 7,471 (3,789) (11,612) 5,102 Ending Fund Balance 317,336 3889831 370,330 400,154 409,977 4179448 413,659 402,047 4079149 19.99% 37.97% 46.62% 51.51% 53.33% 53.45% 52.08% 50.01% 50.00% Fund Balance $500 $400 ♦ • •�� • 'o $300 i ~ $200 $100 $0 100 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Library Operations 82-00040-004005 PROPERTY TAXES-LIBRARY 648,060 673,145 700,000 691,905 670,415 700,000 700,000 700,000 725,000 82-000-40-00-4085 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX INDUSTRIAL TIF - 19,331 7,500 - - - - - - 82-000-40-00-4015 PROPERTY TAXES-DEBT SERVICE 604,131 - - - - - - - - 82-000-41-00-4120 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX 7,217 4,981 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 82-000-41-00-4170 STATE GRANTS 17,193 17,231 17,200 18,852 17,200 17,200 17,200 17,200 17,200 82-000-42-00-4211 DEVELOPMENT FEES-BOOKS 8,825 4,681 - - - - - - - 82-000-42-00-4212 DEVELOPMENT FEES-BUILDING 8,825 - - - - - - - - 82-000-43-00-4330 LIBRARY FINES 14,161 12,864 13,000 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 82-000-44-00-4401 LIBRARY SUBSCRIPTION CARDS 13,742 11,814 12,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 82-000-44-00-4422 COPY FEES 3,339 3,444 3,000 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 82-000-44-00-4440 PROGRAM FEES 36 110 2,000 950 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 82-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 690 393 150 1,260 1,300 1,300 1,500 1,500 1,500 82-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMPLOYEE INS CONTRIBUTIONS - - 6,670 8,685 - - - - - 82-000-46-00-4671 REIMB-LIFE INSURANCE - - 636 711 - - - - - 82-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 1,454 2,695 2,000 1,540 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 82-000-48-00-4824 DVD RENTAL INCOME 4,131 5,416 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 82-000-48-004832 MEMORIALS 1,883 6,119 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 82-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 55 815 - 400 250 250 250 250 250 82-000-48-00-4881 SALE OF BOOKS 300 - - - - - - - 82-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL - - - - 21,490 - - - - 82-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL - 332,500 41,978 30,000 30,684 32,375 34,168 36,068 38,082 Revenue 1,334,042 1,095,539 817,634 788,103 778,639 7889425 790,418 7929318 819,332 82-820-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 501,353 244,695 245,000 245,000 252,540 252,540 252,540 252,540 252,540 82-820-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES - 187,313 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 82-820-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 21,607 23,387 26,692 26,692 27,988 27,988 27,988 27,988 27,988 82-820-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 37,766 32,384 38,000 33,000 33,572 33,572 33,572 33,572 33,572 82-820-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 76,487 86,334 102,877 102,877 90,838 99,922 109,914 116,509 123,499 82-820-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1,200 760 1,410 1,100 625 631 638 644 650 82-820-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 5,451 6,061 6,826 6,100 6,545 7,200 7,919 8,395 8,898 101 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 82-820-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 709 686 770 643 725 798 877 930 986 82-820-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE - - 4,286 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 82-820-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE - 37,692 27,500 28,184 29,875 31,668 33,568 35,582 82-820-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 949 - - 500 500 500 500 500 500 82-820-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 593 215 500 1,000 600 600 600 600 600 82-820-54-00-5423 PUBLIC RELATIONS 112 - - - - - - - - 82-820-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 130 - 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 82-820-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 9,055 8,609 8,500 10,500 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 82-820-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 2,104 538 1,000 300 500 500 500 500 500 82-820-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 11,290 7,495 14,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 82-820-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 31,824 29,909 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 82-820-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES 4,175 - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 82-820-54-00-5468 AUTOMATION 48,567 28,210 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 82-820-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 11,484 8,872 15,750 12,000 12,600 13,230 13,892 14,586 15,315 82-820-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 1,007 - - - - - - - - 82-820-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 28,388 4,276 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 82-820-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES - - 749 749 749 749 749 749 749 82-820-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8,784 5,005 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 82-820-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 6,995 4,694 7,500 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 82-820-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 7,637 - - 1,550 - - - - - 82-820-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 2,180 - - - - - - - - 82-820-56-00-5671 LIBRARY PROGRAMMING 8,172 225 2,000 950 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 82-820-56-00-5676 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 93 - - - - - - - - 82-820-56-00-5680 ADULT BOOKS 30,312 82-820-56-00-5681 JUVENILE BOOKS 40,713 82-820-56-00-5682 REFERENCE BOOKS 11,394 82-820-56-00-5683 AUDIO BOOKS 9,526 82-820-56-00-5684 COMPACT DISCS&OTHER MUSIC 2,122 - - - - - - - - 82-820-56-00-5685 DVD'S 7,715 1,260 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 82-820-56-00-5686 DEVELOPMENT FEES 42,766 4,681 - - - - - - - 82-820-56-00-5698 MEMORIALS&GIFTS 1,622 5,627 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 82-820-56-00-5699 MISCELLANEOUS 800 131 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 102 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 82-820-70-00-7799 CONTINGENCIES 6,705 158 1,000 Debt Service-2005B Bond 82-820-83-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 75,000 - - 82-820-83-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 319,125 Debt Service-2006 Bond 82-820-84-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 150,000 82-820-84-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 61,800 - - 82-820-99-00-9983 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY DEBT SERVICE - - 1,511 5,469 82-820-99-00-9984 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY CAPITAL - 332,519 - - - - - - - Expenditures 1,587,712 1,024,044 794,413 776,780 768,816 780,954 794,206 803,930 814,230 Surplus(Deficit) (253,670) 71,495 23,221 11,323 9,823 7,471 (3,789) (11,612) 59102 Fund Balance 317,336 388,831 370,330 400,154 409,977 417,448 413,659 402,047 407,149 19.99% 37.97% 46.62% 51.51% 53.33% 53.45% 52.08% 50.01% 50.00% 103 Library Debt Service Fund (83) The Library Debt Service Fund accumulates monies for payment of the 2005B and 2006 bonds,which were issued to finance construction of the Library building. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes - 718,839 795,488 791,640 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Investment Earnings - 140 300 200 200 200 200 200 200 Other Financing Sources - - 1,511 5,469 - - - - - Total Revenue - 718,979 797,299 797,309 771,963 716,388 734,513 737,038 744,263 Expenditures Debt Service - 720,800 795,488 795,488 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Total Expenditures - 720,800 795,488 795,488 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Surplus(Deficit) - (1,821) 1,811 1,821 200 200 200 200 200 Ending Fund Balance - (1,821) - 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 $2 Fund Balance $1 r $0 (S1) ($2) 104 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Library Debt Service 83-00040-004015 PROPERTY TAXES-DEBT SERVICE 718,839 795,488 791,640 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 83-00045-004500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 140 300 200 200 200 200 200 200 83-00049-00-4982 TRANSFER FROM LIBRARY OPS - 1,511 5,469 - - - - - Revenue 718,979 797,299 797,309 771,963 716,388 734,513 737,038 744,263 Debt Service-2005B Bond 83-830-83-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 175,000 290,000 290,000 50,875 - - - - 83-830-83-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 316,125 309,125 309,125 290,162 - - - - Debt Service-2006 Bond 83-830-84-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 175,000 150,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 83-830-84-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 54,675 46,363 46,363 39,238 34,488 32,113 29,738 27,363 Debt Service-2013 Refunding Bond 83-830-99-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - 185,000 475,000 505,000 520,000 540,000 83-830-99-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - - 106,488 156,700 147,200 137,100 126,700 Expenditures - 720,800 795,488 795,488 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Surplus(Deficit) - (1,821) 1,811 1,821 200 200 200 200 200 Fund Balance 0 (1,821) 0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 105 Library Capital Fund (84) The Library Capital Fund derives its revenue from monies collected from building permits. The revenue is used for Library building maintenance and associated capital,contractual and supply purchases. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Licenses&Permits - 17,669 16,250 30,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Investment Earnings - 71 100 10 20 20 20 20 20 Other Financing Sources - 332,519 - - - - - - - Total Revenue - 350,259 16,350 30,010 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 Expenditures Contractual Services - - - 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Supplies - - 13,474 14,474 35,350 16,520 16,520 16,520 16,520 Capital Outlay - 10,965 - - - - - - - Other Financing Uses - 332,500 - - - - - - - Total Expenditures - 343,465 13,474 17,974 38,850 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 Surplus(Deficit) - 6,794 2,876 12,036 (18,830) - - - - Ending Fund Balance - 6,794 - 18,830 - - - - - Fund Balance $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 106 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Library Capital 84-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES 17,669 16,250 30,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 84-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 71 100 10 20 20 20 20 20 84-000-49-00-4982 TRANSFER FROM LIBRARY OPS 332,519 - - - - - - - Revenue - 350,259 16,350 30,010 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 84-840-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS - - 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 84-840-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - - - - - - 84-840-56-00-5686 BOOKS 13,474 13,474 35,350 16,520 16,520 16,520 16,520 84-840-56-00-5683 AUDIO BOOKS - - - - - - - 84-840-56-00-5684 COMPACT DISCS&OTHER MUSIC - 84-840-56-00-5685 DVD'S - 1,000 84-840-60-00-6020 BUILDINGS&STRUCTURES 10,965 - 84-840-99-00-9901 TRANSFER TO GENERAL 332,500 - - - - - - - Expenditures - 343,465 tom: 17,974 38,850 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 Surplus(Deficit) - 6,794 " 12,036 (18,830) - - - - Fund Balance 6,794 18,830 107 Fox Industrial TIF Fund (85) The Fox Industrial TIF was created in 2001,in order to finance public infrastructure improvements for the Fox Industrial area. This TIF was closed out in fiscal year 2012. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 228,346 259,052 - - - - - - Investment Earnings 13 275 - - - - - - Total Revenue 228,359 259,327 - - - - - - - Expenditures Contractual Services 1,989 662,322 - - - - - - Supplies - 11,236 - - - - - - Debt Service 79,933 76,783 - - - - - - Other Financing Uses - 78,777 - - - - - - - Total Expenditures 81,922 829,118 - - - - - - - Surplus(Deficit) 146,437 (569,791) - - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 569,790 - - - - - - - - r $600 Fund Balance $400 0 $200 $0 108 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Fox Industrial TIF 85-00040-004085 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX INDUSTRIAL TIF 228,346 259,052 85-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 13 275 Revenue 228,359 259,327 - - - - 85-850-54-00-5400 TIF LIQUIDATION - 658,757 - 85-850-54-00-5420 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 1,989 3,565 85-850-56-00-5619 SIGNS - 11,236 - Debt Service-2002 Bond 85-850-98-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 70,000 70,000 85-850-98-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 9,933 6,783 - - 85-850-99-00-9901 TRANSFER TO GENERAL - 85-850-99-00-9942 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE - 78,777 - - Expenditures 81,922 829,118 - - - - - - Surplus(Deficit) 146,437 (569,791) - - - - - - Fund Balance 569,790 - - - - - - - - 109 Countryside TIF Fund (87) The Countryside TIF was created in February of 2005,with the intent of constructing a future retail development at Countryside Center. This TIF is located at the northwest corner of US Route 34 and IL Route 47. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 6,372 4,188 4,500 - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Investment Earnings 3,134 2,718 2,000 3,100 1,550 - - - - Total Revenue 9,506 6,906 6,500 3,100 1,550 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Expenditures Contractual Services 1,623 1,442 1,375 2,375 1,802,375 2,375 2,375 2,375 2,375 Debt Service 307,093 306,143 304,668 304,668 285,788 119,073 119,073 119,073 119,073 Total Expenditures 308,716 307,585 306,043 307,043 2,088,163 121,448 121,448 121,448 121,448 Surplus(Deficit) (299,210) (300,679) (299,543) (303,943) (2,086,613) (121,448) (21,448) (21,448) (21,448) Ending Fund Balance 2,178,550 1,877,872 1,578,277 1,573,929 (512,684) (634,131) (655,579) (677,026) (698,474) $3,000 Fund Balance N r m $2,000 ♦!. - N 3 $1,000 F $0 ($1,000) 110 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Countryside TIF 87-00040-00-4087 PROPERTY TAXES-COUNTRYSIDE TIF 6,372 4,188 4,500 - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 87-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 3,134 2,718 2,000 3,100 1,550 - - - Revenue 9,506 6,906 6,500 3,100 1,550 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 87-870-54-00-5420 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 1,248 1,067 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 87-870-54-00-5425 TIF INCENTIVE PAYOUT - - - - 1,800,000 - - - - 87-870-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 Debt Service-2005 Bond 87-870-80-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 170,000 175,000 180,000 180,000 185,000 - - - - 87-870-80-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 137,093 131,143 124,668 124,668 75,288 68,073 68,073 68,073 68,073 Debt Service-2013 Refunding Bond 87-870-93-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - - - - - - - 87-870-93-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - 25,500 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 Expenditures 308,716 307,585 306,043 307,043 29088,163 121,448 121,448 121,448 121,448 Surplus(Deficit) (299,210) (300,679) (299,543) (303,943) (2,086,613) (121,448) (21,448) (21,448) (21,448) Fund Balance 291789550 1,8779872 1,5789277 1,573,929 (5129684) (634,131) (6559579) (6779026) (698,474) 111 Downtown TIF Fund (88) The Downtown TIF was created in 2006,in order to finance a mixed use development in the downtown area. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 75,362 67,807 70,000 39,980 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Investment Earnings - 126 150 350 350 350 350 350 350 Total Revenue 75,362 67,933 70,150 40,330 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 Expenditures Contractual Services 1,896 12,152 11,500 15,167 15,350 15,355 15,360 15,365 15,375 Capital Outlay - 7,589 30,000 21,667 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total Expenditures 1,896 19,741 41,500 36,834 45,350 45,355 45,360 45,365 45,375 Surplus(Deficit) 73,466 48,192 28,650 3,496 (10,000) (10,005) (10,010) (10,015) (10,025) Ending Fund Balance 209,760 257,953 264,867 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 r $300 Fund Balance `i $zoo 0 L ~ $100 $0 112 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Downtown TIF 88-000-40-00-4088 PROPERTY TAXES-DOWNTOWN TIF 75,362 67,807 70,000 39,980 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 88-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - 126 150 350 350 350 350 350 350 Revenue 75,362 67,933 70,150 40,330 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 88-880-54-00-5420 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 1,896 366 1,500 167 350 355 360 365 375 88-880-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - 11,786 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 88-880-54-00-5425 TIF INCENTIVE PAYOUT - - - - - - - - 88-880-60-00-6000 PROJECT COSTS 7,589 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 88-880-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - - 20,000 11,667 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Expenditures 1,896 19,741 41,500 36,834 45,350 45,355 45,360 45,365 45,375 Surplus(Deficit) 73,466 485192 28,650 3,496 (10,000) (105005) (10,010) (10,015) (10,025) M Fund Balance 209,760 257,953 264,867 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 113 United City of Yorkville-Consolidated Budget The table and graph below present the City's funds in aggregate,similar to that of a private business(for illustrative purposes only). All budgeted funds are included except for the following: Park&Recreation Capital portion of(25)Vehicle and Equipment;Library Operations(82);Library Debt Service(83);Library Capital(84);Park&Recreation(79);and Recreation Center(80). FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 7,573,994 10,492,418 9,597,933 9,942,856 9,891,567 9,923,220 10,096,474 10,165,862 10,281,069 Intergovernmental 2,433,424 2,849,064 2,844,797 2,919,363 3,363,800 2,552,260 2,676,700 3,020,660 2,986,220 Licenses&Permits 330,094 342,483 276,450 379,669 261,250 261,250 286,250 286,250 311,250 Fines&Forfeits 213,848 181,392 213,150 175,050 189,050 189,050 189,050 189,050 189,050 Charges for Service 5,517,712 5,510,298 5,094,535 5,332,093 5,556,805 5,550,672 5,604,326 5,635,803 5,674,243 Investment Earnings 9,155 11,966 9,250 21,740 18,475 16,675 15,925 15,775 16,175 Reimbursements 641,369 433,001 211,945 235,470 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Land Cash Contributions 432,354 30,767 20,500 52,106 20,500 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Miscellaneous 85,922 72,008 62,000 191,539 192,777 69,632 70,963 72,329 73,731 Other Financing Sources 743,738 727,380 1,203,585 938,585 2,284,233 5,972,810 1,223,992 3,104,375 2,203,435 Total Revenue 17,981,610 209650,777 19,5349145 20,188,471 21,853,457 24,633,569 20,2619680 22,588,104 21,833,173 Expenditures Salaries 4,105,507 3,560,392 3,965,895 3,878,920 4,121,349 4,121,349 4,121,349 4,121,349 4,121,349 Benefits 2,543,948 2,497,616 2,679,562 2,410,399 2,483,992 2,633,226 2,794,151 2,916,566 3,044,822 Contractual Services 4,226,497 5,341,136 4,566,044 4,510,450 6,325,412 4,736,293 4,824,581 4,893,003 5,007,430 Supplies 814,305 761,737 980,446 846,579 898,744 922,784 952,549 984,163 1,012,964 Capital Outlay 513,081 457,112 1,838,225 1,019,703 2,886,266 2,457,016 5,761,766 3,176,606 2,006,066 Contingencies 75,000 52,075 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Developer Commitments 306,861 306,861 341,919 191,917 - - - - - Debt Service 3,110,775 3,337,833 3,375,399 3,375,399 3,918,016 3,834,625 3,972,787 3,984,727 3,984,431 Other Financing Uses 1,695,628 1,981,309 1,598,949 1,586,971 3,865,421 2,365,296 2,450,867 4,357,511 3,470,960 Total Expenditures 17,391,602 18,296,071 19,396,439 17,870,338 24,549,200 219120,587 24,928,050 24,4839925 22,698,022 Surplus(Deficit) 590,008 2,354,706 137,706 2,318,133 (2,695,743) 3,512,982 (4,666,370) (1,895,822) (864,850) Ending Fund Balance 5,896,901 8,251,614 6,832,127 109569,747 7,8749004 11,386,985 6,720,615 4,824,793 3,959,944 33.91% 45.10% 35.22% 59.15% 32.07% 53.91% 26.96% 19.71% 17.45% Fund Balance $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 114 Yorkville Parks and Recreation-Consolidated Budget The table and graph below present the Park&Recreation funds in aggregate,similar to that of a private business(for illustrative purposes only). All budgeted Park&Recreation funds are included: Parks&Recreation(79);Recreation Center(80);and the Parks&Recreation Capital portion of Vehicle&Equipment(25). FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Charges for Service 830,766 888,788 830,250 749,525 303,275 242,275 242,275 242,275 242,275 Investment Earnings 400 503 450 700 650 650 650 650 650 Reimbursements 14,829 14,038 51,661 52,265 50,000 - - - - Miscellaneous 198,644 208,662 279,200 216,691 223,000 223,000 223,000 223,000 232,700 Other Financing Sources 951,890 736,710 955,886 955,886 2,322,461 1,110,111 1,192,708 1,217,069 1,229,444 Total Revenue 1,996,529 1,848,701 2,117,447 1,975,067 2,899,386 1,576,036 1,658,633 1,682,994 1,705,069 Expenditures Salaries 912,499 853,663 925,800 840,050 802,469 783,969 785,544 787,198 788,934 Benefits 137,717 132,716 325,689 331,945 332,398 352,014 373,590 387,836 402,936 Contractual Services 510,600 540,570 585,780 637,680 341,530 222,530 196,993 201,678 206,598 Supplies 287,298 283,625 373,131 357,156 307,889 293,358 295,186 297,141 299,233 Capital Outlay 24,658 - 50,000 12,000 17,000 16,000 - - - Debt Service - - - - 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Other Financing Uses - 3,500 2,500 2,500 606,957 - - - - Total Expenditures 1,872,772 1,814,074 2,262,900 2,181,331 2,410,743 1,670,371 1,653,812 1,676,353 1,700,202 Surplus(Deficit) 123,757 34,627 (145,453) (206,264) 488,643 (94,335) 4,821 6,641 4,867 Ending Fund Balance 879914 122,537 (159,341) (83,727) 404,917 310,582 315,402 322,043 326,911 4.69% 6.75% -7.04% -3.84% 16.80% 18.59% 19.07% 19.21% 19.23% $600 Fund Balance m $400 $200 $0 ($200) 115 Yorkville Public Library-Consolidated Budget The table and graph below present the Library's funds in aggregate,similar to that of a private business(for illustrative purposes only). All budgeted Library funds are included: Library Operations(82);Library Debt Service(83);and Library Capital(84). FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 1,252,191 1,411,315 1,502,988 1,483,545 1,442,178 1,416,188 1,434,313 1,436,838 1,469,063 Intergovernmental 24,410 22,212 22,200 23,852 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 Licenses&Permits 17,650 22,350 16,250 30,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Fines&Forfeits 14,161 12,864 13,000 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 Charges for Service 17,117 15,368 17,000 13,450 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Investment Earnings 690 604 550 1,470 1,520 1,520 1,720 1,720 1,720 Reimbursements - - 7,306 9,396 - - - - - Miscellaneous 7,823 15,045 8,500 8,940 9,250 9,250 9,250 9,250 9,250 Other Financing Sources - 665,019 43,489 35,469 52,174 32,375 34,168 36,068 38,082 Total Revenue 1,334,042 2,164,777 1,6319283 1,615,423 1,5709622 19524,833 1,544,951 19549,376 1,583,615 Expenditures Salaries 501,353 432,008 440,000 440,000 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 Benefits 143,220 149,612 218,553 200,412 190,977 202,485 215,076 224,105 233,675 Contractual Services 149,678 88,124 111,599 111,649 112,549 113,179 113,841 114,535 115,264 Supplies 180,831 21,623 35,224 37,224 56,600 37,770 37,770 37,770 37,770 Contingencies 6,705 158 1,000 - - - - - - Debt Service 605,925 720,800 795,488 795,488 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Capital Outlay - 10,965 - - - - - - - Other Financing Uses - 665,019 1,511 5,469 - - - - - Total Expenditures 1,587,712 2,088,309 1,603,375 1,590,242 19579,429 1,517,162 1,548,539 1,560,788 1,578,313 Surplus(Deficit) (253,670) 76,468 27,908 25,181 (8,807) 7,671 (3,589) (11,412) 5,302 Ending Fund Balance 317,336 393,804 370,330 418,985 410,177 417,848 414,259 402,847 408,149 19.99% 18.86% 23.10% 2635% 25.97% 27.54% 26.75% 25.81% 25.86% Fund Balance s $500 $400 o $300 ~ $200 $100 $0 116 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected CITY Cash Flow-Surplus(Deficit) General 221,031 1,542,522 931,242 2,175,101 (705,588) 629,989 501,342 (1,454,104) (559,978) Fox Hill 15,716 (871) (714) (1,680) (3,714) (11,067) (11,067) 3,933 3,933 Sunflower 5,735 265 (2,455) (4,174) (7,454) (18,569) (18,569) 6,431 6,431 C Motor Fuel Tax 234,779 284,457 (119,313) 130,732 (434,456) (152,112) (197,368) (222,769) (48,885) ro m Municipal Bldg 20,700 7,650 5,250 6,000 573,374 c Vehicle&Equip (64,400) (11,568) (147,095) (253,550) (15,937) (22,636) 0 0 (1) e City Wide Capital 19,030 80,544 263,232 292,241 153,479 4,043,647 (4,325,317) (245,245) 1 Debt Service 1,025 78,857 (78,226) (76,824) 925 925 (38,922) (42,860) 129,402 Water 356,361 475,577 (284,604) 78,435 (7,301) (12,641) (29,560) (28,642) (15,012) Sewer (357,382) 625,704 (255,393) (107,560) (229,959) (479,253) (275,452) (291,104) (309,269) Land Cash 216,720 93,847 96,675 379,859 77,500 (333,850) (240,000) 410,000 (40,000) Fox Industrial TIF 146,437 (569,791) - - - - Countryside TIF (299,210) (300,679) (299,543) (303,943) (2,086,613) (121,448) (21,448) (21,448) (21,448) Downtown TIF 73,466 48,192 28,650 3,496 (10,000) (10,005) (10,010) (10,015) (10,025) 590,008 2,354,706 137,706 2,318,133 (2,695,743) 3,512,982 (4,666,370) (1,895,822) (864,850) Cash Flow-Fund Balance General (271,900) 1,270,623 1,596,094 3,445,724 2,740,136 3,370,126 3,871,468 2,417,364 1,857,386 Fox Hill 17,942 17,071 16,719 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) Sunflower 11,922 12,188 10,007 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) C) Motor Fuel Tax 640,399 924,857 465,255 1,055,589 621,133 469,021 271,653 48,885 0 ro Municipal Bldg (587,024) (579,374) (575,774) (573,374) - - - - ao Vehicle&Equip 303,690 292,122 39,578 38,572 22,635 (0) 0 0 (0) d City Wide Capital 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 a Debt Service 8,653 87,510 8,925 10,686 11,611 12,536 (26,386) (69,246) 60,156 Water 825,261 1,300,837 642,452 1,379,272 1,371,971 1,359,330 1,329,770 1,301,128 1,286,117 Sewer 2,377,831 3,003,537 2,625,761 2,895,977 2,666,019 2,186,765 1,911,313 1,620,209 1,310,940 Land Cash (388,625) (294,778) (172,534) 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) Fox Industrial TIF 569,790 - - - - Countryside TIF 2,178,550 1,877,872 1,578,277 1,573,929 (512,684) (634,131) (655,579) (677,026) (698,474) Downtown TIF 209,760 257,953 264,867 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 5,896,901 8,251,614 6,832,127 10,5699747 7,874,004 11,386,985 6,720,615 4,8249793 3,959,944 117 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Cash Flow-Actual Cash on Hand at FYE PROJECTED General (1,577,285) - 2,239,721 1,781,089 2,190,582 2,516,454 1,571,287 1,207,301 Fox Hill 18,249 17,388 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) Sunflower 12,442 12,488 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) 0 Motor Fuel Tax 660,220 899,316 1,020,589 586,133 434,021 236,653 13,885 (35,000) b Municipal Bldg (587,024) - (573,374) - Vehicle&Equip 297,039 291,608 38,572 22,635 (0) 0 0 (0) a City Wide Capital 60,873 167,963 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 a Debt Service 8,653 87,510 10,686 11,611 12,536 (26,386) (69,246) 60,156 Water 137,277 516,574 551,709 548,788 543,732 531,908 520,451 514,447 Sewer 2,281,063 1,218,819 1,303,190 1,199,708 984,044 860,091 729,094 589,923 Land Cash (641,002) - 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) Fox Industrial TIF 569,790 - - - Countryside TIF 2,178,549 1,878,062 1,573,929 (512,684) (634,131) (655,579) (677,026) (698,474) Downtown TIF 209,760 261,109 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 3,628,604 5,350,836 - 6,908,393 4,590,463 8,154,122 3,481,517 2,271,924 19782,171 62% 65% 65% 58% 72% 52% 47% 45% 118 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Park&Recreation Cash Flow-Sur-plus(Deficit) Vehicle&Equip (15,409) 11,030 (9,000) 28,225 (16,775) (15,775) 225 225 225 Park&Rec 206,408 48,510 (55,320) 12,978 37,950 (78,560) 4,596 6,416 4,642 Rec Ctr (67,242) (24,913) (81,133) (247,467) 467,468 - - - 123,757 34,627 (145,453) (206,264) 488,643 (94,335) 49821 6,641 49867 Cash Flow-Fund Balance Vehicle&Equip 51,443 62,473 22,545 90,698 73,923 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 Park&Rec 231,558 280,065 185,635 293,043 330,993 252,433 257,029 263,445 268,088 Rec Ctr (195,087) (220,001) (367,521) (467,468) 0 0 0 0 0 87,914 122,537 (159,341) (83,727) 404,917 310,582 315,402 322,043 326,911 119 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Library Cash Flow-Sur-plus(Deficit) Library Ops (253,670) 71,495 23,221 11,323 9,823 7,471 (3,789) (11,612) 5,102 Library Debt Service (1,821) 1,811 1,821 200 200 200 200 200 Library Capital 6,794 2,876 12,036 (18,830) - - - - (253,670) 76,468 27,908 25,181 (8,807) 7,671 (3,589) (11,412) 5,302 Cash Flow-Fund Balance Library Ops 317,336 388,831 370,330 400,154 409,977 417,448 413,659 402,047 407,149 Library Debt Service - (1,821) - 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Library Capital - 6,794 18,830 - - - - - 317,336 393,804 370,330 418,985 410,177 417,848 414,259 402,847 408,149 Cash Flow-Actual Cash on Hand at FYE Library Ops 349,841 412,283 Library Debt Service - - Library Capital - 1,375 349,841 413,658 - - - - - - 120 Chart 3 FY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 City property tax (non-library, estimate) $2,600,000 $2,639,000 $2,691,780 $2,745,616 $2,800,528 $2,856,538 Non-abatement property taxes $2,212,735 $730,000 $590,000 $460,000 $320,000 $250,000 Total $4,812,735 $3,369,000 $3,281,780 $3,205,616 $3,120,528 $3,106,538 Percentage change each year -30.0% -2.6% -2.3% -2.7% -0.4% $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 ■Non-abatement property taxes $2,000,000 ■City property tax(non-library) $1,000,000 $0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 121 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Allocated Items-Aggregated Liability Insurance 325,906 308,490 424,000 317,250 330,000 349,800 370,788 393,035 416,617 Unemployment Ins 77,786 91,200 60,000 45,600 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 Citv Health Insurance 1,185,928 1,207,844 1,346,185 1,234,033 1,150,430 1,265,473 1,392,020 1,475,542 1,564,074 COBRA Contri 21,675 23,220 12,500 817 - - - - - Retiree Contri 39,671 48,447 60,398 50,994 EE his Contributions 193,147 91,536 84,768 91,345 - - - - - CL Net Ins Costs 931,435 1,044,641 19188,519 1,090,877 1,1509430 192659473 19392,020 19475,542 1,5649074 City Dental Insurance 86,818 87,225 96,667 92,563 95,675 105,243 115,767 122,713 130,076 C Vision Insurance 12,532 10,188 10,377 9,914 10,408 11,449 12,594 13,349 14,150 Library Health Insurance 76,487 86,334 102,877 102,877 90,838 99,922 109,914 116,509 123,499 Lib EE Ins Contributions - - 6,670 8,685 - - - - - Lib Net Ins Costs 769487 86,334 96,207 94,192 90,838 99,922 109,914 116,509 123,499 Property Taxes Corporate 2,185,495 2,282,246 2,288,133 2,276,807 2,288,154 2,311,036 2,334,146 2,357,487 2,381,062 Police Pension 336,075 360,356 413,354 438,711 562,000 587,000 612,000 637,000 662,000 Total City Capped 2,521,570 2,642,602 2,701,487 2,715,518 2,850,154 2,898,036 2,946,146 2,994,487 3,043,062 Non-Abatement of Debt Service - 2,207,080 723,683 720,098 486,146 371,538 290,732 210,022 129,402 Total City 2,521,570 4,849,682 3,425,170 3,435,616 3,336,300 3,269,574 3,2369878 3,204,509 39172,464 -29.2% -2.9% -2.0% -1.0% -1.0% -1.0% Building Permits Revenue 126,829 153,393 140,000 140,000 150,000 1509000 1759000 175,000 200,000 122 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Allocated Items-A22reeated(cont.) City Salaries Full Time 4,500,413 3,917,584 4,261,000 4,184,250 4,454,018 4,454,018 4,454,018 4,454,018 4,454,018 Overtime 98,513 105,775 122,875 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 Part Time 401,940 373,333 477,820 380,320 310,500 292,000 293,575 295,229 296,965 Total 5,000,866 4,396,692 4,861,695 4,708,370 4,908,318 4,889,818 4,891,393 498939047 4,894,783 Lib Salaries Full Time 501,353 244,695 245,000 245,000 252,540 252,540 252,540 252,540 252,540 Part Time 187,313 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 Total 501,353 432,008 440,000 440,000 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 Total Salaries Full Time 5,001,766 4,162,279 4,506,000 4,429,250 4,706,558 4,706,558 4,706,558 4,706,558 4,706,558 Overtime 98,513 105,775 122,875 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 Part Time 401,940 560,646 672,820 575,320 505,500 487,000 488,575 490,229 491,965 Total 5,502,219 49828,700 59301,695 59148,370 5,3559858 59337,358 5,3389933 5,340,587 5,342,323 Capital Projects-A22reaated Route 47 Expansion Project - 50,108 317,900 202,574 337,766 337,766 337,766 337,766 337,766 MFT - 1219900 76,652 121,900 121,900 121,900 121,900 121,900 Water 25,054 116,000 75,305 129,094 129,094 129,094 129,094 129,094 Sewer 25,054 60,000 38,951 66,773 66,773 66,773 66,773 66,773 Downtown TIF - 20,000 11,667 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Road to Better Roads Program - 100,000 - 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 123 A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 4.0 Legal ❑ Minutes#1 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ CC 2013-14 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the City Council—February 12, 2013 Meeting and Date: City Council—March 12, 2013 Synopsis: Approval of Minutes Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Beth Warren City Clerk Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY,FEBRUARY 12,2013 Mayor Golinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Warren called the roll. Ward I Koch Present Colosimo Present Ward II Milschewski Present Kot Present Ward III Munns Present Funkhouser Present Ward IV Spears Present Teeling Present Also present: City Clerk Warren, City Attorney Orr, City Administrator Olson,Police Chief Hart, Deputy Chief of Police Hilt,Public Works Director Dhuse,Finance Director Fredrickson,EEI Engineer Sanderson, Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble,Building Code Official Ratos QUORUM A quorum was established. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. PRESENTATIONS Certificate of Recognition to Yorkville Middle School IMSA Fusion Team Mayor Golinski presented certificates of recognition to Yorkville Middle School's IMSA Fusion Team. Ms. Kessler gave the City Council background on the IMSA Fusion Team. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS Fred Anderson,Meadowlark Lane, discussed radon in homes and the fire arms ordinance for Autumn Creek. Barb Johnson,Library Board member, discussed Yorkville's library budget. Jesus Alaniz,Colonial Parkway, discussed the City's budget. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Monthly Treasurer's Reports for November&December 2012 (ADM 2013-02) 2. Local Debt Recovery Program(ADM 2013-04) a. Intergovernmental Agreement By and Between the Illinois Office of the Comptroller and the United City of Yorkville Regarding Access to the Comptroller's Local Debt Recovery Program—authorize the City Administrator to execute. b. Non-Disclosure Agreement By and Between the Illinois Office of the Comptroller and the United City of Yorkville Regarding Confidential Information—authorize the City Administrator to execute. 3. City Services Survey 2013 (ADM 2013-05) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Kot. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye,Milschewski-aye, Spears-aye,Munns-aye, Funkhouser-aye,Koch-aye, Teeling-aye,Kot-aye MINUTES FOR APPROVAL 1. Minutes of the City Council—January 8,2013 (CC 2013-09) 2. Minutes of the Special Meeting of the City Council—January 15, 2013 (CC 2013-10) 3. Minutes of the City Council—January 22, 2013 (CC 2013-11) The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—February 12,2013—Page 2 of 4 Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the minutes of the special City Council meeting for January 15, 2013, and the regular City Council meetings for January 8,2013 and January 22,2013 as presented. So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Spears. Alderman Colosimo had a change on the January 22,2013 meeting. There were references to the word amenity which should be changed to entity. A motion was made by Mayor Golinski to approve the minutes as corrected. Minutes approved unanimously by a viva voce vote. BILLS FOR PAYMENT City Attorney Orr stated voting on bills is no longer an agenda item. The bills will be submitted to the City Council for review. REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT Ordinance 2013-12 Approving a Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area(TC13123,LLC d/b/a Rowdys) (EDC 2013-05) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving a redevelopment agreement for the downtown Yorkville redevelopment project area(TCB 123,LLC dba Rowdys) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye, Spears-aye PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT Active Radon System (EDC 2013-09) Alderman Munns stated this was an informational item. City Administrator Olson stated this was pushed forward out of the EDC meeting. Building Code Official Ratos explained that the active radon system is in regards to how to control radon in new construction homes. City Administrator Olson stated the specific proposal would be taken back to EDC if the Council is in favor of it. Then once an ordinance would be drafted the EDC would be looking for approval from the Council. The EDC is looking for direction from the City Council this evening. Alderman Munns asked how many builders do the radon system and if it is done,isn't it a competitive advantage if someone is trying to sell their home. Building Code Official Ratos stated yes. At this time they currently require a passing system meaning the piping has to be installed.An active system is not required to be installed and,to his knowledge, it is not required anywhere in Illinois. Every new home that is built has a passive radon reduction system but not an active system. Alderman Colosimo is not in favor of the active radon system. Alderman Colosimo stated the only difference between an active and passive radon system is the fan. That is an upgrade of about$300 when building a home. If a homeowner goes to sell a home without a fan then it is very expensive to have the radon checked. From a cost benefit analysis it makes sense to have an active radon system,yet he doesn't believe that there is any reason for this to be mandated. He will vote against it. Alderman Spears disagrees and thinks an active system in all the new constructed homes would be beneficial to the residents purchasing the homes. She would like Yorkville to be proactive on this issue. She doesn't think$300 is going to break the bank for the builders. She also believes it is a public safety issue for residents buying new homes. Building Code Official Ratos explained why there is not a mandated active radon system state wide or even nationwide with the international codes. Alderman Kot asked if radon can develop over time and the answer is yes. Building Code Official Ratos stated the best time to test a house for radon is immediately after construction. Alderman Kot asked about radon in homes that are several years old and asked if the City should educate residents on this issue. Building Code Official Ratos stated it is a concern but the accumulation of the radon gas is somewhat mitigated in older homes due to the fact that there is air movement. City Administrator Olson would like a consensus of whether to draft an ordinance or not.Mayor Golinski addressed each alderman. Six aldermen were not for regulating the active radon system and two aldermen were for regulating an active radon system. South Side Residential Development Incentive Program (EDC 2013-10) Alderman Munns explained this item. Mayor Golinski said there are some good ideas in this program. Alderman Kot appreciates the Council moving quickly on this issue. He wanted to know how the equation was originated on proposal#4.Alderman Colosimo came up with it through an example he The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—February 12,2013—Page 3 of 4 gave that builders were interested in building spec homes. Builders think by building a spec home they can show their product and possibly build a few more. Alderman Colosimo explained the frame work of this idea and what they came up with. He wanted to bring it to the Council for feedback. Alderman Kot thinks the proposals are good. He would like to move ahead. City Administrator Olson thinks it's reasonable for a certain number of spec homes to have their fees waived but the builders would have to pay to get a certificate of occupancy. Mayor Golinski said the Council will be discussing this item again in the near future. Alderman Spears inquired about the building permit fees. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PARK BOARD No report. PLAN COMMISSION No report. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS No report. CITY COUNCIL REPORT No report. CITY CLERK'S REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY&LIAISON REPORT No report. STAFF REPORT No report. PRESENTATIONS Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Presentation (CC 2013-12) City Administrator Olson gave budget presentation# 1 on the Fiscal Year 2014 Budget. He presented the budget narrative memo,the year by year overview, and items to note. (See attached.)The plan is to do two presentations. The first presentation will be tonight and the next will be on February 26,2013 at the next City Council meeting. After the presentations there will one mandated public hearing,which is schedule on March 12,2013. There will be three City Council meetings after the public hearing in which the budget can be discussed. Our end date for budget approval is April 30, 2013. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Downtown Railroad Tracks Alderman Kot discussed the downtown railroad tracks and if they were scheduled to be repaired. Prairie Parkway Funding Mayor Golinski was invited to a meeting on February 14,2013, for stake holders in Prairie Parkway Funding. The parkway was funded from Route 34 to Route 71 with$200 million allocated. Since the parkway was delayed, about$80,000 of that money has been reallocated. Some Kendall and Kane county residents are upset. Tom Cross agreed to hold a meeting with all the stake holders. Yorkville's official position is that it is ludicrous to spend$80,000 in southern Kendall County. Mayor Golinski wanted to check with the Council to see if they had any different thoughts on what Yorkville's priorities should be. The Council seemed to agree with Mayor Golinski. 4th of July Celebration Mayor Golinski gave the background on Yorkville's 4th of July celebration. As of now,the Fireman's Association has been disbanded. There was a meeting in January in regards to someone taking over the 4th of July celebration but the attendance was sparse.Another meeting was held the end of January and there was a large turnout. Many organizations want to help.No one wants to see this annual celebration cease. Tim Evans stepped up to lead the charge,not as a City employee. Mayor Golinski doesn't think anyone wants to see this turn into a City event.Yorkville wants this to remain a community event. The ultimate The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—February 12,2013—Page 4 of 4 goal is to form a 501C3 charitable organization and keep the celebration as it has been for years. There was a meeting today and the realization is that there is not enough time between now and the 4th of July to set up a charitable organization. It has been suggested that for this year only the City take it on under its umbrella. The biggest issue is liability insurance. If there is not an organization that can provide insurance then there is no way the event can take place. Mayor Golinski is bringing this forward to see if any of the Council has an objection to this idea. There shouldn't be any additional cost to the City to provide this event. Mayor Golinski said as far as funding the Fireman's Association has about$11,000 that they feel belongs to the Yorkville's community, and that would go directly to fireworks. The Fireman's Association said they would do one more fireworks show for Yorkville.New Life Church offered to sponsor the children's rides with a monetary donation. The City received a call from the old jail fundraiser group. There is about$6,000 left in that account and they offered to use that money for the celebration this year. Much progress was made during these three meetings. There would still need to be a concentrated fundraising effort to fund this all from community donations. That is the way it stands now and if there is no objection then that is the route the City is going to take. Mayor Golinski feels this celebration is very important to the City. EXECUTIVE SESSION None. CITIZEN COMMENTS Joel Frieders, Whispering Meadows, once again addressed the food selection in Yorkville. He discussed his background, and how food is an essential part of taking care of oneself and their body. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Golinski announced meeting adjourned. Meeting adjourned at 8:47 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Beth Warren, City Clerk, City of Yorkville,Illinois A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 4.0 Legal ❑ Minutes#2 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ CC 2013-15 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Minutes of the City Council—February 26, 2013 Meeting and Date: City Council—March 12, 2013 Synopsis: Approval of Minutes Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Lisa Pickering Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY,FEBRUARY 26,2013 Mayor Golinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Deputy City Clerk Pickering called the roll. Ward I Colosimo Present Koch Present Ward II Milschewski Present Kot Present Ward III Munns Present Funkhouser Present Ward IV Spears Absent Teeling Present Also present: Deputy City Clerk Pickering, City Administrator Olson, Chief of Police Hart,Public Works Director Dhuse,Finance Director Fredrickson, Community Development Director Barksdale- Noble,Deputy Chief Hilt,EEI Engineer Sanderson, and Administrative Intern Weckbach. QUORUM A quorum was established. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. PRESENTATIONS None. PUBLIC HEARING PC 2013-02 Tim Greyer,Petitioner,has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County, Illinois,requesting an amendment to the Briarwood Subdivision(formerly Cornerstone) Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development dated July 22,2003 and subsequently amended on April 24, 2004 related to the reduction of building and development fees. The real property consists of approximately 18 acres located generally north of Route 71; west of Route 47; and generally east of Walsh Drive in Yorkville, Illinois. Please see attached transcript from the court reporter regarding the public hearing portion of the meeting. CITIZEN COMMENTS Beth Gambro,Library Board President, spoke about the library's budgetary needs (see attached). She told the City Council that many items had been entirely cut from the library budget, including the purchase of new library books, and many other items had also been drastically reduced. Ms. Gambro asked for the City Council to please consider the library's needs when they discuss the budget for the upcoming fiscal year. She said that the library would not even be able to continue at the current reduced level of service without some additional funding by the city. Paul LaLonde,Program Director of the Voluntary Action Center,which is the non-profit agency that operates the Kendall Area Transit(KAT)program, spoke about the importance of the KAT program to the Yorkville community and urged the City Council to rethink the proposal to cut Yorkville's contribution to KAT when they discuss the budget. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Ordinance 2013-13—Ordinance Amending City Code Regarding Temporary Liquor Permits— authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute(PS 2013-03) 2. Water Department Reports for November and December 2012 (PW 2013-01) 3. Autumn Creek—Unit IA Resubdivision—Bond Reduction-authorize reduction to Bond Safeguard Insurance Company Bond#5040207 in an amount not to exceed$225,331.34 (PW 2013-02) 4. Autumn Creek—Unit 2B—Bond Reduction-authorize reduction to Bond Safeguard Insurance Company Bond#5040207 in an amount not to exceed$225,331.34(PW 2013-03) 5. River Road Over Blackberry Bridge—Authorization of Contract Changes Nos. 1-6-authorize City Administrator to execute(PW 2013-04) 6. Terracon Agreement Amendment for Downtown Brownfield Study-approve amendment to contract for site remediation services as presented(PW 2013-05) The Minutes of the Reizular Meeting of the City Council—February 26,2013—Paze 2 of 3 Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the consent agenda. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Koch. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Munns-aye,Milschewski-aye,Koch-aye,Teeling-aye, Funkhouser-aye,Kot-aye, Colosimo-aye MINUTES FOR APPROVAL None. BILLS FOR PAYMENT (Informational): $793,516.85 REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT Resolution 2013-03 of Support for the Reallocation of Prairie Parkway Funds to the Northern Route 47 Corridor (CC 2013-13) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve a Resolution of Support for the Reallocation of Prairie Parkway Funds to the Northern Route 47 Corridor. So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Mayor Golinski said that he had attended a meeting on February 14, 2013 in Oswego that Representative Tom Cross had facilitated. He said that all of the decision makers were in attendance and everyone discussed their point of view. Mayor Golinski feels that Yorkville's position is very strong for taking the funding from the southern section of Route 47 and reallocating it to the northern section of Route 47 instead. He said that all of the arguments that he made to support the reallocation of funds to the northern Route 47 corridor were listed in the proposed resolution,which he read aloud in its' entirety. Alderman Kot commented that anyone who drives on Route 47 between Sugar Grove and Yorkville on a regular basis knows the importance of getting this section of Route 47 expanded. He said that he fully supports this resolution. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Milschewski-aye, Koch-aye, Teeling-aye,Funkhouser-aye, Kot-aye, Colosimo-aye,Munns-aye PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT Old Jail Parking Lot Redesign (PW 2013-07) A motion was made by Alderman Teeling to approve changes to the plan design to stay within the project budget as follows: Parking lot—asphalt instead of permeable pavers; Retaining wall selection—lower cost alternative will be selected; Curb, gutter and sidewalk along Main Street—will be removed; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. Alderman Teeling said that the Public Works Committee had discussed this item. She asked Engineer Sanderson how much the project cost would increase if the project moved forward with the original design. Engineer Sanderson said that the original design would cost approximately$200,000- $300,000 above the budgeted amount due to the cost increases in materials and labor costs that have occurred since the project was initiated. Alderman Teeling commented that she is very disappointed that the permeable pavers will have to be removed from the project. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Koch-aye, Teeling-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Kot-aye, Colosimo-aye,Munns-aye,Milschewski-aye ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT No report. The Minutes of the Reizular Meeting of the City Council—February 26,2013—Pa2e 3 of 3 PARK BOARD No report. PLAN COMMISSION No report. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS No report. CITY COUNCIL REPORT No report. CITY CLERK'S REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY&LIAISON REPORT No report. STAFF REPORT No report. PRESENTATIONS Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Presentation (CC 2013-12) City Administrator Olson and Administrative Intern Weckbach gave a presentation on the Fiscal Year 2014 Budget(see attached). This presentation was the second out of two presentations to the City Council. Administrator Olson reminded everyone that there would be a public hearing on the budget at the March 12,2013 City Council meeting and that the City Council would need to approve a budget before April 30,2013. Administrator Olson and Administrative Intern Weckbach then went through the budget narrative memo that was included with the budget and they explained where the different items were located at within the budget. They highlighted items within the following funds: General Fund, MFT, City-Wide Capital,Vehicle and Equipment,Parks and Recreation(79 budget),REC Center(80 budget),Land Cash,Water, Sewer,TIF funds, SSA funds, and Debt Service. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. CITIZEN COMMENTS Lori Runkle said that she was present at the City Council meeting, along with her son Joe Runkle,to voice their support of the city's continuing contribution to the Kendall Area Transit program. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Golinski adjourned the meeting to go into executive session for the purpose of the discussion of minutes of meetings lawfully closed under the Open Meetings Act,whether for the purposes of approval by the body of the minutes or semi-annual review of the minutes. The City Council entered executive session at 8:08 p.m. The City Council returned to regular session at 8:31 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to adjourn the meeting. So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Munns. Motion unanimously approved by a viva voce vote. Meeting adjourned at 8:31 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk, City of Yorkville, Illinois i 1 1 2 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 4 KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS i i I 5 I 6 7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING j i i 8 PUBLIC HEARING 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 I 16 City Council Chambers i I 17 800 Game Farm Road 18 Yorkville , Illinois 19 20 21 Tuesday , February 26 , 2013 i i 22 7 : 00 p . m . j 23 24 11 tosh Reporting Service 815 . 99392832 cros . vitosh @gmail . com 2 I 1 PRESENT : 2 Mr . Gary Golinski , Mayor ; 3 Mr . Carlo Colosimo , Alderman , Ward I ; 4 Mr . Ken Koch , Alderman , Ward I ; 5 Ms . Jackie Milschewski , Alderman , Ward II ; 6 Mr . Larry Kot , Alderman , Ward II ; i 7 Mr . Marty Munns , Alderman , Ward III ; i i 8 Mr . Chris Funkhouser , Alderman , Ward III ; 1 9 Ms . Diane Teeling , Alderman , Ward IV . i r 10 11 ALSO PRESENT : i 12 Mr . Bart Olson , City Administrator . l 13 Ms . Lisa Pickering , Deputy Clerk . 14 . . . . . i 15 i 16 I 17 18 19 i 20 i I 21 i i 22 i 23 24 Vitosh Weporting Service 815 . 993 . 2832 cros . vitosh @gmail . com i i 3 i 1 ( WHEREUPON , the following was had I i 2 in public hearing : ) I 3 MAYOR GOLINSKI : One public hearing , so i 4 I would like to enter into a public hearing for I 5 PC 2013 - 02 , Tim Greyer , Petitioner , has filed an i 6 application with the United City of Yorkville , i 7 Kendall County , Illinois , requesting an amendment I 8 to the Briarwood Subdivision ( formerly 9 Cornerstone ) Annexation Agreement and Planned 10 Unit Development dated July 22nd , 2003 , and 11 subsequently amended on April 24th , 2004 , related i 12 to the reduction of building and development i 13 fees . i 14 The real property consists of i i 15 approximately 18 acres located generally north of i i 16 Route 71 , west of Route 47 , and generally east of I 17 Walsh Drive in Yorkville , Illinois . 18 Unfortunately Mr . Greyer couldn ' t be i 19 here this evening , but do we have any comments 20 from the public regarding this petition ? i 21 ( No response . ) �i 22 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Any comments or i 23 questions from Council ? 24 ( No response . ) Vitosh Reporting Service 815 . 993 . 2832 cros . vitosh @gmail . com i i i 4 1 MAYOR GOLINSKI : Okay , then we will 2 close the public hearing . Thank you . I 3 ( Which were all the proceedings had 4 in public hearing . ) i 5 - - - 000 - - - 6 i I 7 8 9 i I 10 I i j 11 i I 12 i I 13 j j 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 j 22 i i 23 j i i 24 i Vitosh Reporting Service 815 . 993 . 2832 cros . vitosh @gmail . com i i 5 i 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) i SS . 2 COUNTY OF LASALLE ) 3 I , Christine M . Vitosh , a Certified 4 Shorthand Reporter , do hereby certify that I I 5 reported in shorthand the proceedings had at the i i 6 pubic hearing and that the foregoing , Pages 1 7 through 7 , inclusive , is a true , correct and 8 complete computer - generated transcript of my i 9 shorthand notes so taken at the time and place j 10 aforesaid . I 11 I further certify that my certificate 12 annexed hereto applies to the original transcript 13 and copies thereof , signed and certified under my I i 14 hand only . I assume no responsibility for the i i 15 accuracy of any reproduced copies not made under j i 16 my control or direction . 17 As certification thereof , I have i i 18 hereunto set my hand this 27th day of February , 19 A . D . , 2013 . f 20 21 I 22 Christine M . Vitosh , CSR Illinois CSR No . 084 - 002883 23 I 24 Titosh Reporting Service 815 . 993 . 2832 cros . vitosh @gmail . com i 0 B enter [i1 - 3:4 KENDALL Ill - 1 :4 R evening [i1 - 3: 19 Koch ill - 2:4 Kot [1] - 2:6 084-002883 [1] - 5:22 Bart [1) - 2: 12 F real [11 - 3: 14 Briarwood [il - 3:8 L reduction Ill - 3: 12 1 building [l1 - 3: 12 regarding [i] - 3:20 Farm [11 - 1 : 17 related [11 - 3: 11 C February [z1 - 1 :211 Larry [11 - 2:6 reported Ill - 5:5 1 [11 - 5:6 5: 18 LASALLE [i1 - 5:2 Reporter [i1 - 5:4 18 [i1 - 3: 15 fees [l] - 3: 13 Lisa [1 ] - 2: 13 reproduced ill - 5: 15 Carlo [11 - 2:3 filed [i1 - 3:5 located [1] - 3: 15 [ ] requesting [l] - 3:7 2 certificate [1] - 5: 11 following [l] - 3: 1 response [z] - 3:21 , certification [il - 5: 17 foregoing [l1 - 5:6 M 3:24 Certified [1] - 5: 3 former) i - 3:8 2003 [1] - 3 : 10 y [ I responsibility [i1 - 20041i1 - 3: 11 certified [t1 - 5: 13 Funkhouser [i1 - 2: 8 5: 14 2013 [21 - 1 :21 , 5: 19 certify [21 - 5:4, 5: 11 Marty [�l - 2 :7 Chambers [1] - 1 : 16 G Mayor [l] - 2 :2 Road [1] - 1 : 11 6 2013-02 [�1 - 3:5 Chris [11 - 2:8 MAYOR [31 - 3:3 , 3:22, Route [2] - 3: 22nd ill - 3: 10 Christine [2] - 5: 3, 4: 1 24th [i] - 3: 11 Game ill - 1 : 17 MEETING [1] - 1 :7 S 26 Ill - 1 :21 5:22 CITY [z1 - 1 :3, 1 :7 Gary [11 - 2:2 M[Ischewski [l1 - 2: 5 27th [11 - 5: 18 City [3] - 1 : 16, 2: 12, generally [21 - 3: 15, Munns 1 - 2:7 [ set [11 - 5: 18 3:6 3: 16 Shorthand [l] - 5:4 4 Clerk [1) - 2: 13 generated [t] - 5:8 N shorthand [21 - 5:5, close [1] - 4:2 Golinski Ill - 2:2 5:9 47 [1) - 3: 16 Colosimo [l] - 2:3 GOLINSKI [31 - 3:31 signed ill - 5: 13 comments [21 - 3: 19, 3:22 , 4: 1 north [i1 - 3: 15 SS ill - 5: 1 7 Greyer [2] notes [l] - 5 : 9 3:22 Gre y [ ] - 3:5, 3 : 18 STATE [1 ] - 5: 1 complete Ill - 5: 8 O Subdivision [11 - 3:8 computer [11 - 5:8 H subsequently ill - 7 [1) - 5:7 computer-generated 3: 11 71 Ill - 3: 16 Ill - 5:8 OF [31 - 1 :3, 5: 1 , 5:2 7:00 [1] - 1 :22 hand (2] - 5: 14, 5: 18 consists [11 - 3: 14 HEARING [11 - 1 :8 Olson [il - 2: 12 T control [1] - 5: 16 one [11 - 3: 3 hearing [6l - 3:2, 3:3, $ copies [zl - 5: 13, 5: 15 3:4, 4:2, 4:4, 5:6 original [i] - 5: 12 Teeling [1] - 2 : 9 Cornerstone [i] - 3: 9 hereby 1] - 5:4 correct [i] - 5:7 Y P thereof [21 - 5: 13, 5 : 17 800 Ill - 1 : 17 hereto [11 - 5: 12 Tim [11 - 3: 5 COUNCIL [i] - 1 :7 hereunto [11 - 5: 18 transcript [2) - 5:8, Council [2] - 1 : 16, A 3:23 p.m [i] - 1 :22 5: 12 County [11 - 3:7 Pages [11 - 5:6 true [l] - 5:7 A.D [11 - 5 : 19 COUNTY [21 - 1 :4, 5 :2 PC Ill - 3:5 Tuesday Ill - 1 :21 accuracy [i] - 5: 15 CSR [21 - 5:22 , 5:22 II [zl - 2:5, 2:6 petition r [13 3: acres [11 - 3: 15 III [2] - 2 :71 2 :8 Petitioner [�] - 3:5 U Administrator [1] - p ILLINOIS [2] - 1 :4, 5: 1 Pickering [11 - 2 : 13 place [1] - 5:9 2: 12 Illinois [41 - 1 : 18, 3:7, under [z1 - 5: 13, 5: 15 aforesaid [11 - 5: 10 3: 17, 5:22 Planned [1] - 3:9 unfortunately [11 - Agreement [i1 - 3:9 dated [i] - 3: 10 inclusive [l] - 5:7 PRESENT [z] - 2: 1 , 3: 18 Alderman 71 - 2: 3, Deputy Ill - 2: 13 IV [�] - 2:9 2 : 11 Unit ill - 3: 10 2 :4, 2:5, 2:6, 2:7, Development [1] - proceedings [21 - 4: 37 UNITED [i] - 1 : 3 2:8 2:9 3: 10 J 5:5 United [1] - 3:6 ALSO ill - 2: 11 development [11 - property [11 - 3: 14 amended Ill - 3: 11 3: 12 pubic [l] - 5:6 V amendment [l] - 3 :7 Diane [1] - 2:9 Jackie [l1 - 2: 5 PUBLIC [11 - 1 :8 Annexation Ill - 3:9 direction [i ] - 5: 16 July [1] - 3: 10 public [61 - 3:2 , 3:31 annexed (1) - 5 : 12 Drive [1] - 3: 17 3:4 , 3:20, 4:2, 4:4 Vitosh [2] - 5:31 5:22 application [i1 - 3:6 K applies [1] - 5: 12 E Q W April (1) - 3: 11 Ken [i1 - 2:4 assume [11 - 5: 14 east [1 ] - 3 : 16 Kendal[ [11 - 3:7 questions [11 - 3:23 Walsh Ill - 3: 17 Vitosh Reporting Service 815 . 993 . 2832 cros . vitosh @gmail . com i I 7 Ward [7[ - 2 :31 2:4 , i 2 :5, 2:6, 2:7, 2:8, 2: 9 west [i] - 3: 16 WHEREUPON [i[ - 3: 1 Y YORKVILLE [1[ - 1 : 3 Yorkville [3[ - 1 : 18, 3 :6, 3: 17 i i i I I I i i i I I i I i i I i I I Vitosh Reporting Service 815 . 993 . 2832 cros . vitosh @gmail . com �It. D CO. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number v -n Legal : Bills for Payment Finance EST. A _ 1838 Engineer ❑ ~=� City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number Human Resources El �© Community Development ❑ '+ Police ❑ CLE ti�'� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Bills for Payment - $583,379.96 Meeting and Date: City Council—March 12, 2013 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Amy Simmons Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE TIME : 10 : 53 : 05 PAGE : 1 ID : AP211001 . WOW PRE - CHECK RUN EDIT INVOICES DUE ON/BEFORE 02 / 28 /2013 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM INVOICE # DATE . . . . . . � # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # PROJECT CODE ITEM AMT 514953 ILTREASU STATE OF ILLINOIS TREASURER 6 02 / 15 / 13 01 MFT -RT . 47 EXPANSION MARCH PYMT 15 - 155 - 60 - 00 - 6079 • 10 , 158 . 33 02 WATER OP - RT . 47 EXPANSION 51 - 510 - 60 - 00 - 6079 10 , 757 . 81 03 MARCH PYMT * * COMMENT * * 04 SEWER OP - RT . 47 EXPANSION 52 - 520 - 60 - 00 - 6079 5 , 564 . 38 05 MARCH PYMT * * COMMENT * * 06 DOWNTOWN TIF -RT . 47 EXPANSION 88 - 880 - 60 - 00 - 6079 1., 666 . 67 07 MARCH PYMT * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 28 , 147 . 19 CHECK TOTAL : 28 , 147 . 19 514954 CHITITLE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO . 022813 - OSLAD 02 / 28 / 13 01 LAND CASH - TITLE INSURANCE FOR 72 - 720 - 60 - 00 - 6036 02 DONANTION PARCEL FOR- OSLAD * * 323 . 00 • 03 GRANT COMMENT * * * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 323 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 323 . 00 514955 R0001137 MICHELE SCHUSTER 20120566 - BUILD 02 / 25 / 13 01 MUNICIPAL BUILDING- 2374 TITUS 16 - 000 - 24 - 00 - 2445 300 . 00 02 BUILD PROGRAM * * COMMENT * * 03 PW CAPITAL - 2374 TITUS DR . 21 - 000 - 24 = 00 - 2445 1 , 400 . 00 04 BUILD PROGRAM * * COMMENT * * 05 CW CAPITAL - 2374 TITUS DR , 23 - 000 - 24 - 00 - 2445 51640 . 00 06 BUILD PROGRAM * * COMMENT * * 07 WATER OP - 2374 TITUS DR . BUILD 51 - 000 - 24 - 00 - 2445 21660 . 00 08 PROGRAM * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 10 , 000 . 00 HEOK„ CiTw hAL : 10 , 000 . 00 514956 YORKPOST YORKVILLE POSTMASTER ” 030113 03 / 01 / 13 01 WATER OP -UTILITY BILL POSTAGE 51 - 510 - 54 - 00 - 5452 5 , 011 . 55 INVOICE TOTAL : 21011 . 55 CHECK TOTAL : 21011 . 55 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID : 21011 . 55 !L'LiY • VJ / VJ / iJ VLV11l:JL 1x111 Vi iVL\L\ VyYYL � .yy � LIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER ?RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 : HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT --- -- -- --- - --------- -- - - --- -- -- - ---- - ---- - -------- -- --------- - -- - - --- ----- ------ --- ----- ---- ------- - -- ------ - -------- --------- ----- - 514957 AACVB AURORA AREA CONVENTION 013113 -ALL 02 / 22 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -JANUARY ALL 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5481 10 . 69 02 SEASONS HOTEL TAX * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 10 . 69 013113 -HAMPTON 02 / 25 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -JANUARY HAMPTON 01 - 640 - 54- 00 - 5481 21149 . 51 02 INN HOTEL TAX * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 21149 . 51 013113 - SUPER 02 / 25 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -JANUARY SUPER 8 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5481 524 . 16 02 HOTEL TAX * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 524 . 16 CHECK TOTAL : 21684 . 36 514958 ALTEC ALTEC INDUSTRIES , INC . 5023304 02 / 12 / 13 01 STREETS -ANNUAL SAFETY CHECK 01 - 410 - 54- 00 - 5495 678 . 18 02 FOR BUCKET TRUCK * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 678 . 18 * CHECK TOTAL : 678 . 18 514959 AMPERAGE AMPERAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY INC 0447831 - IN 02 / 07 / 13 01 STREETS -PHOTOCONTROL 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 - 5640 255 . 06 INVOICE TOTAL : 255 . 06 * 0448364 - IN 02 / 11 / 13 01 STREETS -BATTERY 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 - 5656 144 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 144 . 00 * CHECK TOTAL : 399 . 06 514960 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 610 - 7922912 02 / 19 / 13 01 STREETS -UNIFORMS 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 - 5606 22 . 54 - 2 - TIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER vy PRG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT --- -- - ---- - ---- ------------- --- - ------- - --- ----- ----- --------- ----- --- --------- ----------------- --- ----- ------------- ---- -- 514960 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 610 - 7922912 02 / 19 / 13 02 WATER OP -UNIFORMS 51 -510 - 56 - 00 -5600 22 . 54 03 SEWER OP -UNIFORMS 52 - 520 - 56 - 00 - 5600 22 . 55 INVOICE TOTAL : 67 . 63 * CHECK TOTAL : 67 . 63 514961 ATTINTER AT & T INTERNET SERVICES 020913 02 / 09 / 13 01 ADMIN-T . 1 SERVICE 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5440 968 . 79 INVOICE TOTAL : 968 . 79 * CHECK TOTAL : 968 . 79 514962 BANKNY THE BANK OF NEW YORK 123112 - STREBATE 02 / 28 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES - SEPT . - DEC 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5492 130 , 694 . 48 02 2012 KENDALL MARKETPLACE * * COMMENT * * 03 SALES TAX REBATE * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 130 , 694 . 48 * CHECK TOTAL : 130 , 694 . 48 514963 BATTPLUS BATTERIES PLUS 487 - 101779 - 01 12 / 11 / 12 01 POLICE -MAG BATTERIES O1 -210 - 56 - 00 - 5620 150 . 27 INVOICE TOTAL : 150 . 27 * CHECK TOTAL : 150 . 27 514964 BEHRD DAVID BEHRENS 030113 03 / 01 / 13 01 SEWER OP -FEB . 2013 MOBILE 52 - 520 - 54 - 00 - 5440 45 . 00 02 EMAIL REIMBURSEMENT * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 45 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 45 . 00 - 3 - TIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER vy PRG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - - ---- - -- -- -- -- ------- ---- -- - - ---- - ---- - --- ------- -- - -- ----- ---- ----- ---- -------- ----- - ---- - ------ --- -- -- -- -- - - -- 514965 BNYCORP THE BANK OF NEW YORK 252 - 1685732 02 / 08 / 13 01 COUNTRYSIDE TIF - SERIES 2005 87 - 870 - 54 - 00 - 5498 374 . 50 02 PAYING AGENT FEES * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 374 . 50 CHECK TOTAL : 374 . 50 514966 BOOMBAH BOOMBAH 123112 -STREBATE 02 / 28 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES - SEPT . - DEC . 01 - 640 - 54- 00 - 5492 511 . 40 02 2012 SALES TAX REBATE * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 511 . 40 CHECK TOTAL : 511 . 40 514967 BPAMOCO BP AMOCO OIL COMPANY 37247387 -PD 02 / 24 / 13 01 POLICE-GASOLINE 01 - 210 - 56 - 00 -5695 228 . 35 INVOICE TOTAL : 228 . 35 CHECK TOTAL : 228 . 35 514968 BUILDERI BUILDERS INSULATION 341980 02 / 11 / 13 01 STREETS - INSULATE CEILING AT 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 -5446 31770 . 00 02 185 WOLF STREET * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 3 , 770 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 31770 . 00 514969 CALLONE UNITED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS 1010 - 7980 - 0000 - 0213C 02 / 15 / 13 01 ADMIN-JANUARY ADMIN CHARGES 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5440 248 . 13 02 ADMIN-JAN . CITY HALL NORTEL 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5440 271 . 04 03 POLICE -JAN . CITY HALL NORTEL 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5440 271 . 04 - 4 - 'At , VJl WJl iJ VtVi1LL V1 Vl 1Vt\t\ ViYYY " 1t . ' IME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER IRG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 'HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - - - -- -- ---- ---- --- -- -------- ---------- --- - --- --------- ---- ---- -- - - ----- --- - ---------------- --------- ---- - ---- ------- - ----- ---- ---- -- 514969 CALLONE UNITED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS 1010 - 7980 - 0000 - 0213C 02 / 15 / 13 04 WATER OP - JAN . CITY HALL NORTEL 51 -510 - 54 - 00 -5440 271 . 04 05 POLICE-JANUARY POLICE CHARGES 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5440 701 . 09 06 POLICE-JAN . CITY HALL FIRE 01 - 210 -54 - 00 - 5440 57 . 79 07 ADMIN-JAN . CITY HALL FIRE 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5440 57 . 78 O8 WATER OP - JAN , PW CHARGES 51 - 510 - 54 - 00 - 5440 1 , 236 . 75 INVOICE TOTAL : 3 , 114 . 66 CHECK TOTAL : 3 , 114 . 66 514970 CARGILL CARGILL , INC 2900990114 02 / 14 / 13 01 WATER OP-BULK ROCK SALT 51 - 510 - 56 - 00 -5638 21755 . 50 INVOICE TOTAL : 21755 . 50 CHECK TOTAL : 2 , 755 . 50 514971 COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 6963019021 - 0213 02 / 15 / 13 01 STREETS -LIGHTS 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 - 5480 24 . 51 INVOICE TOTAL : 24 . 51 7090039005 - 0113 02 / 11 / 13 01 STREETS -LIGHTS 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 - 5480 21 . 17 INVOICE TOTAL : 21 . 17 8344010026 - 0213 02 / 22 / 13 01 STREETS -LIGHTS 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 - 5480 402 . 48 INVOICE TOTAL : 402 . 48 CHECK TOTAL : 448 . 16 514972 CONSTELL CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY 0009064030 02 / 18 / 13 01 WATER OP - 2224 TREMONT STREET 51 - 510 - 54 - 00 - 5480 3 , 156 . 72 INVOICE TOTAL : 3 , 156 . 72 CHECK TOTAL : 3 , 156 . 72 - 5 - TIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER vy PRG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - --- -- ----- - ----- - ------ - ---- -- - -- ---- - - -- --- - ---- - --- - --- - ---- ----- ---- --- ----- ------ --- ----- - 514973 CPRCOUNT DALE PENN JR , 2013 - 00002 02 / 22 / 13 01 POLICE-CPR TRAINING FOR 25 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5412 875 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 875 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 875 . 00 51'4974 DAVEAUTO DAVID L CHELSEN 20330 02 / 11 / 13 01 POLICE - SQUAD REPAIR 01 -210 -54 - 00 - 5495 187 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 187 , 00 20367 02 / 21 / 13 01 POLICE - SQUAD REPAIR 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5495 361 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 361 . 00 20368 02 / 21 / 13 01 POLICE - SQUAD REPAIR 01 -210 - 54 - 00 - 5495 743 . 00 .INVOICE TOTAL : 743 . 00 20373 02 / 22 / 13 01 POLICE - SQUAD REPAIR 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5495 300 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 300 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 1 , 591 . 00 514975 DEPO DEPO COURT REPORTING SVC , INC 15733 02 / 05 / 13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW- 01 / 09 / 13 PLAN 90 - 041 - 41 - 00 - 0011 329 . 00 02 COMMISSION FOR SALEK FINAL * * COMMENT * * 03 PLAT * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 329 . 00 15737 02 / 15 / 13 01 POLICE -JAN . 30 ADMIN HEARING 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5467 175 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 175 . 00 15738 02 / 15 / 13 01 POLICE -FEB . 6 ADMIN HEARING 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5467 175 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 175 . 00 15739 02 / 15 / 13 01 POLICE-FEB . 13 ADMIN HEARING 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5467 175 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 175 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 854 . 00 - 6 - ' IME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER V RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT -- -- -- --- - --------- - --- ---- ---- -- ----------- -------- - ---- ---- ----------- -- ---- - - --------- -- -------- -------- - ---------------- - - - -- -- 514976 DUTEK THOMAS & JULIE FLETCHER 384373 02 / 21 / 13 01 WATER OP-HOSE ASSEMBLY , 51 - 510 - 56 - 00 - 5620 121 . 40 02 NIPPLES , COUPLER * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 121 . 40 CHECK TOTAL : 121 . 40 514977 DUYS DUY ' S COMFORT SHOES 20007313 02 / 15 / 13 01 COMM/ DEV-BOOTS 01 -220 - 56 - 00 -5620 140 . 25 INVOICE TOTAL : 140 . 25 CHECK TOTAL : 140 . 25 514978 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES , INC . 4 02 / 20 / 13 01 CW CAPITAL-KENNEDY RD . BIKE 23 - 230 - 60 - 00 - 6094 11879 . 77 02 PATH - PHASE 1 * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 11879 . 77 52220 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -CENTRAL RT , 47 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 250 . 50 02 IMPROVEMENTS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 250 . 50 52221 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -GAME FARM / 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 238 . 00 02 SOMONAUK IMPROVEMENTS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 238 . 00 52222 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -OVERWEIGHT 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 409 . 25 02 TRUCK PERMITS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 409 . 25 52223 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -KKCOM MEETINGS 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 371 . 50 02 AND COORDINATION * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 371 . 50 - 7 - ' IME : 11 : 25 : 36 V � yuCHECK yREGISTER Y � uuy vy 'RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 :HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - -- -- - - ----- -- - ---- -- --- -- ----- ------- - - - - -- --- - - --- - - --- ----------------- ------ - - - ------- - ---- ---- -- ------- ------ -- - ----- ------- -- 514978 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES , INC . 52224 02 / 20 / 13 01 CW CAPITAL -PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 23 -230 - 54 - 00 - 5462 83 . 50 02 SYSTEM * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 83 . 50 52225 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES - STAGECOACH 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 19 . 50 02 CROSSING * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 19 . 50 52226 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -CANNONBALL AND 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 202 . 50 02 RT . 47 IMPROVEMENTS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 202 . 50 52227 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -AUTUMN CREEK 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 437 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 437 . 00 52228 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -RAGING WAVES 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 453 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 453 . 00 52229 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -RUSH COPLEY 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 19 . 50 02 REGIONAL STORMWATER * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 19 . 50 52230 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -RUSH COPLEY 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 144 . 00 02 PHASE 1A & STORM RETROFITS * * COMMENT' * * INVOICE TOTAL : 144 . 00 52231 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -UTILITY PERMIT 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 544 . 50 02 REVIEWS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 544 . 50 52232 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -MUNICIPAL 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 1 , 900 . 00 02 ENGINEERING SERVICES * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 1 , 900 . 00 52233 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -BRIARWOOD 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 485 . 50 INVOICE TOTAL : 485 . 50 � S � ' IME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER - v 'RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 :HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - ----- - ------ - -- - ---- ---- ------ ------- ---- ---- - -------- - - ------- ---- - --------- --- - ------- ---- --------- ---- - -- - ----- ---- -- ---- 514978 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES , INC . 52234 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -AUTUMN CREEK 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 605 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 605 . 00 52235 02 / 20 / 13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-KENDALL 90 - 039 - 39 - 00 - 0111 1 , 347 . 00 02 CROSSING * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 11347 . 00 52236 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -DAIRY QUEEN 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 119 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 119 . 00 52237 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -CAPITAL 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 -5465 167 . 00 02 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 167400 52238 02 / 20 / 13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW- SALEK 90 - 041 - 41 - 00 - 0111 11188 . 50 02 SUBDIVISION * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 11188 . 50 52239 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -KENNEDY AND 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 -5465 1 , 571 . 50 02 MILL RD . COST ESTIMATES * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 11571 . 50 52240 02 / 20 / 13 01 DOWNTOWN TIF-LOT 6 ALTA SURVEY 88 - 880 - 60 - 00 - 6000 232 . 50 INVOICE TOTAL : 232 . 50 52242 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -CITY OF 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 213 . 00 02 YORKVILLE - GENERAL * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 213 . 00 52243 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -RT . 34 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 417 . 50 02 MCDONALDS SITE IMPROVEMENTS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 417 . 50 52269 02 / 20 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -AUTUMN CREEK - 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 484 . 00 ' IME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER IRG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 'HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT --- - - -- ----- -- - -- --- -- - - -- -- --- -------- - - - --- - --- -- --- - --- - -- - - ---- -- ------ - ----- -- --- ---------- - ------------ ---- ---- --------- -- ---- 514978 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES , INC . 52269 02 / 20 / 13 02 UNIT 1 RESUBDIVISION * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 484 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 13 , 783 . 02 514979 EYEMED FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INS . 4894527 03 / 04 / 13 01 ADMIN-MARCH 2013 VISION INS 01 - 110 - 52 - 00 - 5224 49 . 19 02 ADMIN-MARCH 2013 ELECTED 01 - 110 - 52 - 00 -5238 58 . 55 03 OFFICIALS VISION INS . * * COMMENT * * 04 FINANCE-MARCH 2013 VISION INS . 01 - 120 - 52 - 00 -5224 26 . 98 05 POLICE -MARCH 2013 VISION INS . 01 -210 - 52 - 00 - 5224 302 . 03 06 COMM/ DEV-MARCH 2013 VISION INS 01 - 220 - 52 - 00 -5224 31 . 57 07 STREETS -MARCH 2013 VISION INS . 01 - 410 -52 - 00 - 5224 58 . 55 08 ADMIN SERVICES -MARCH 2013 01 - 640 - 52 - 00 -5242 48 . 19 09 RETIREES VISION INS . * * COMMENT * * 10 PARKS -MARCH 2013 VISION INS . 79 - 790 - 52 - 00 - 52.24 74 . 75 11 RECREATION-MARCH 2013 VISION 79 - 795 - 52 - 00 -5224 24 . 65 12 INS . * * COMMENT * * 13 WATER OP -MARCH 2013 VISION INS 51 -510 - 52 - 00 - 5224 62 . 32 14 SEWER OP-MARCH 2013 VISION INS 52 - 520 - 52 - 00 - 5224 • 22 . 49 15 LIBRARY-MARCH 2013 VISION INS . 82 - 820 -52 - 00 -5224 53 . 60 INVOICE TOTAL : 812 . 87 CHECK TOTAL : 812 . 87 514980 FASTENAL FASTENAL COMPANY ILOSW13071 02 / 14 / 13 01 STREETS-JACK HAMMER HANDLE 01 -410 - 56 - 00 - 5630 66 . 47 INVOICE TOTAL : 66 . 47 CHECK TOTAL : 66 . 47 514981 FOXRIVER FOX RIVER STUDY GROUP lo - : IME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER )RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 :HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT --- -- -- -- - - --------- - ---- --- ---- ----- ----- --- -- -- - ---- - --- -- ------ ---- - -- -- ---- - --- --- -- - -- - - - ------ --- ---- -- --- ----- ---- ----- ---- - - 514981 FOXRIVER FOX RIVER STUDY GROUP 021113 02 / 11 / 13 01 ADMIN- 2012 FINANCIAL 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 -5460 11550 . 00 02 PARTICIPATION DUES * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 1 , 550 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 1 , 550 . 00 514982 FREDRICR ROB FREDRICKSON 030113 03 / 01 / 13 01 FINANCE -FEB . 2013 MOBILE EMAIL 01 - 120 - 54 - 00 - 5440 45 . 00 02 REIMBURSEMENT * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 45 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 45 . 00 514983 GALLS GALL ' S INC . 000409524 02 / 15 / 13 01 POLICE-BOOTS 01 - 210 - 56 - 00 - 5600 91 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 91 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 91 . 00 514984 GARDKOCH GARDINER KOCH & WEISBERG H- 19361C - 89756 02 / 04 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -KENDALL MARKET 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5461 202 . 00 02 PLACE * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 202 . 00 H- 1974C- 89816 02 / 04 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES - IEPA MATTERS 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5461 180 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 180 . 00 H- 2013C - 90277 02 / 11 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -HAMMAN FEES 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5461 357 . 50 INVOICE TOTAL : 357 . 50 H- 2364C- 89817 02 / 04 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -KIMBALL HILL 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5461 1 , 220 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 11220 . 00 DIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER ?RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - -- ---- ----- - -- ----- ---- --- - -- -- - - - -- ---- - --- --- --- --- ---- - - - - ---- ------ ---------------- - - - - --- - -- 514984 GARDKOCH GARDINER KOCH & WEISBERG H- 3029C- 89819 02 / 04 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -WR BOND 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 -5461 100 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 100 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 2 , 059 . 50 514985 GODWINL LISA R . GODWIN 021913 02 / 24 / 13 01 ADMIN-FEB . 19 PW COMMITTEE 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5462 51 . 24 02 MEETING MINUTES * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 51 . 24 CHECK TOTAL : 51 . 24 514986 GOLINSKI GARY GOLINSKI 030113 03 / 01 / 13 01 ADMIN-FEB . 2013 MOBILE EMAIL 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5440 45 . 00 02 REIMBURSEMENT * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 45 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 45 . 00 514987 HAWKINS HAWKINS INC 3434922 02 / 08 / 13 01 WATER OP- CHEMICALS 51 - 510 - 56 - 00 - 5638 284 . 06 INVOICE TOTAL : 284 . 06 3434923 02 / 08 / 13 01 WATER OP - CHEMICALS 51 - 510 - 56 - 00 -5638 902 . 96 INVOICE TOTAL : 902 . 96 3434924 02 / 08 / 13 01 WATER OP-CHEMICALS 51 - 510 - 56 - 00 - 5638 253 . 84 INVOICE TOTAL : 253 . 84 CHECK TOTAL : 1 , 440 . 86 514988 HENDERSO HENDERSON PRODUCTS , INC . - 12 - TIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER - - u PRG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT -- - ---- - --- ------ --- ---- -- -- ---- ----- --- - -------- ----- ---- - ------- ----- ---- ---- --- ------ -- ----- -- --- ---- ----- - -- - -- - - -- -- - - - --- ----- 514988 HENDERSO HENDERSON PRODUCTS , INC . S8 - 01201 02 / 20 / 13 01 STREETS -BEARING 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 -5640 36 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 36 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 36 . 00 514989 HRGREEN HR GREEN 83660 12 / 11 / 12 01 ADMIN SERVICES -CANNONBALL & 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 3 , 643 . 50 02 RT . 47 * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 3 , 643 . 50 * 84281 01 / 10 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -CANNONBALL & 01 -640 - 54 - 00 - 5465 11030 . 14 02 RT . 47 * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 1 , 030 . 14 * CHECK TOTAL : 41673 . 64 514990 IDNETWOR ID NETWORKS 166874 03 / 01 / 13 01 POLICE -LIVE SCAN ANNUAL 01 -210 - 54 - 00 -5469 11995 . 00 02 SERVICE AGREEMENT * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 1 , 995 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 1 , 995 . 00 514991 IPRF ILLINOIS PUBLIC RISK FUND 12489 02 / 11 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES -APRIL WORKERS 01 - 640 - 52 - 00 - 5231 81003 . 00 02 COMP INS . * * COMMENT * * 03 WATER OP -APRIL WORKERS COMP 51 - 510 - 52 - 00 - 5231 995 . 00 04 INS . * * COMMENT * * 05 SEWER OP -APRIL WORKERS COMP 52 - 520 - 52 - 00 - 5231 662 . 00 06 INS . * * COMMENT * * 07 ADMIN SERVICES -PARK & REC 01 - 640 - 52 - 00 - 5231 11660 . 00 - 1 3 - TIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT -- - - - - - ---- ---- - --- -------- - ----------- -- ---- -- --- - ----- ---- ---------- - ---- ---- --- ----- - ---- ---- - ---- - -------- --- ----- - --- ---- -- 514991 IPRF ILLINOIS PUBLIC RISK FUND 12489 02 / 11 / 13 08 APRIL WORKERS COMP INS . * * COMMENT * * 09 ADMIN SERVICES -APRIL REC 01 - 640 - 52 - 00 -5231 521 . 00 10 CENTER WORKERS COMP . INS . * * COMMENT * * 11 LIBRARY-APRIL WORKERS COMP INS 82 - 820 - 52 - 00 - 5231 11155 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 12 , 996 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 12 , 996 . 00 514992 ITRON ITRON 278146 02 / 09 / 13 01 WATER OP -HOSTING SERVICES 51 - 510 -54- 00 - 5462 474 . 48 INVOICE TOTAL : 474 . 48 CHECK TOTAL : 474 . 48 514993 JIMSTRCK JAMES GRIBBLE 144303 01 / 02 / 13 01 STREETS -TRUCK INSPECTION 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 -5495 26 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 26 . 00 144304 01 / 02 / 13 01 STREETS -TRUCK INSPECTION 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 - 5495 26 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 26 . 00 144305 01 / 02 / 13 01 STREETS -TRUCK INSPECTION 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 -5495 26 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 26 . 00 144639 01 / 22 / 13 01 STREETS -TRUCK INSPECTION 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 -5495 26 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 26 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 104 . 00 514994 JSHOES JEFFREY L . JERABEK 0538 - 13 02 / 21 / 13 01 SEWER OP-BOOTS -BEHRENS 52 - 520 - 56 - 00 - 5600 169 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 169 . 0.0 - 1 4 - ' IME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER vy 11 'RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - ----------- ------ --- ------ -- -- --- ----- ----- --- - -- --- - -- - ---- --- - --- - -- ---- --- - --- ---- --------- - ---- --- --- - -- --- ---- ----- - 514994 JSHOES JEFFREY L . JERABEK 0538 - 14 02 / 21 / 13 01 WATER OP-BOOTS - SCODRO 51 - 510 - 56 - 00 - 5600 167 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 167 . 00 * CHECK TOTAL : 336 . 00 514995 JUSTSAFE JUST SAFETY , LTD 18908 02 / 26 / 13 01 SEWER OP -FIRST AID SUPPPLIES 52 -520 - 56 - 00 - 5620 22 . 05 INVOICE TOTAL : 22 . 05 * CHECK TOTAL : 22 . 05 514996 KCACP KENDALL COUNTY ASSOCIATION 858372 02 / 20 / 13 01 POLICE-FEBRUARY MEETING 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5415 75 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 75 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 75 . 00 514997 KENPRINT ANNETTE M . POWELL 18854 02 / 15 / 13 01 ADMIN - 500 BUSINESS CARDS 01 - 110 - 56 - 00 -5610 33 . 50 INVOICE TOTAL : 33 . 50 18859 02 / 20 / 13 01 POLICE -4 NOTARY STAMPS 01 -210 - 56 - 00 -5620 111 . 60 INVOICE TOTAL : 111 . 60 18862 02 / 22 / 13 01 POLICE- 2 NOTARY STAMPS 01 -210 - 56 - 00 - 5620 55 . 80 INVOICE TOTAL : 55 . 80 CHECK TOTAL : 200 . 90 514998 LEEJENSE LEE JENSEN SALES CO . , INC . 126700 02 / 14 / 13 01 WATER OP- TRENCH SHORING 51 -510 - 56 - 00 -5630 11300 . 00 - 15 - LIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER ?RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 :HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - --- - ---- - --- -- ------- -------- --- ------ ---- -------- - - --- -- ------ - -- -- -- -- ----- - -- --- ------- - --- - - - --- -- - - ---- - -- - -- ---- ---- ----- 514998 LEEJENSE LEE JENSEN SALES CO . , INC . 126700 02 / 14 / 13 02 SEWER OP -TRENCH SHORING 52 - 520 - 56 - 00 - 5630 1 , 299 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 2 , 599 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 2 , 599 . 00 514999 LINCOLNF LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 022113 02 / 21 / 13 01 ADMIN -MARCH LIFE INS . 01 - 110 - 52 - 00 - 5222 48 . 32 02 ADMIN-MARCH ELECTED OFFICIAL 01 - 110 - 52 - 00 - 5236 56 . 85 03 LIFE INS . * * COMMENT * * 04 FINANCE-MARCH LIFE INS . 01 - 120 - 52 - 00 - 5222 29 . 76 05 POLICE -MARCH LIFE INS . 01 -210 - 52 - 00 - 5222 381 . 95 06 COMM/ DEV-MARCH LIFE INS . 01 -220 - 52 - 00 - 5222 45 . 06 07 STREETS -MARCH LIFE INS . 01 - 410 - 52 - 00 -5222 104 . 53 08 PARKS -MARCH LIFE INS . 79 - 790 - 52 - 00 - 5222 78 . 98 09 RECREATION-MARCH LIFE INS . 79 - 795 - 52 - 00 - 5222 39 . 30 10 WATER OP-MARCH LIFE INS . 51 - 510 - 52 - 00 - 5222 74 . 29 11 SEWER OP-MARCH LIFE INS . 52 -520 - 52 - 00 - 5222 24 . 80 12 REC CENTER-MARCH LIFE INS . 80 - 800 - 52 - 00 - 5222 7 . 25 13 LIBRARY-MARCH LIFE INS . 82 - 820 - 52 - 00 - 5222 85 . 59 INVOICE TOTAL : 976 . 68 CHECK TOTAL : 976 . 68 515000 LOCALGOV TIM SCHLONEGER 13120 02 / 15 / 13 01 ADMIN-MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 -5460 600 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 600 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 600 . 00 515001 MENINC MENARDS INC 123112 - STREBATE 02 / 28 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES - SEPT . - DEC . 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5492 54 , 380 . 05 - 16 - ' IME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER -- V )RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : • 03 / 12 / 13 'HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT -- - - - ------ - --- ----- -- --- -------- ---- -------- - - ---- ----- ------ - --- ---- - --- ---- - ---- ----- ---- -- -- ------- - - - ------- --- - --------- ---- - - 515001 MENINC MENARDS INC 123112 - STREBATE 02 / 28 / 13 02 2012 SALES TAX REBATE * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 541380 . 05 CHECK TOTAL : 54 , 380 . 05 515002 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 18315 02 / 01 / 13 01 POLICE -DUCT TAPE 01 - 210 - 56 - 00 - 5620 8 . 89 INVOICE TOTAL : 8 . 89 19352 02 / 11 / 13 01 WATER OP -POWER LUBE , DUCT 51 - 510 - 56 - 00 - 5620 7 . 96 02 SEALING COMPOUND * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 7 . 96 19578 02 / 13 / 13 01 STREETS -SKELETON GUN , 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 - 5620 25 . 41 02 SANDCLOTHS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 25 . 41 19655 02 / 14 / 13 01 SEWER OP- DISH SOAP , HAND 52 - 520 - 56 - 00 - 5620 18 . 78 02 CLEANER , PLEDGE * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 18 . 78 20126 02 / 19 / 13 01 STREETS -WRENCH , LUBRICANT 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 - 5620 9 . 94 INVOICE TOTAL : 9 . 94 ' * 20228 02 / 20 / 13 01 WATER OP-MOP REFILL , ROLLER 51 - 510 - 56 - 00 - 5638 12 . 37 02 MOP * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 12 . 37 CHECK TOTAL : 83 . 35 515003 MERLIN DEYCO , INC . 17566 06 / 06 / 12 01 POLICE -OIL CHANGE 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5495 32 . 12 INVOICE TOTAL : 32 . 12 _ l7 _ TIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER vu y PRG ID : AP215000 . W0W CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515003 MERLIN DEYCO , INC . 18401 07 / 21 / 12 01 POLICE -MOUNT & BALANCE TIRES , 01 -210 - 54 - 00 - 5495 41 . 54 02 VALVE STEM * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 41 . 54 19443 09 / 18 / 12 01 POLICE -MOUNT & BALANCE TIRES 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5495 24 . 13 INVOICE TOTAL : 24 . 13 22040 02 / 20 / 13 01 POLICE - OIL CHANGE 01 -210 - 54 - 00 - 5495 29 . 95 INVOICE TOTAL : 29 . 95 22041 02 / 20 / 13 01 POLICE -OIL CHANGE 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5495 29 . 95 INVOICE TOTAL : 29 . 95 22064 02 / 21 / 13 01 POLICE -OIL CHANGE 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 -5495 36 . 20 INVOICE TOTAL : 36 . 20 22127 02 / 26 / 13 01 POLICE -OIL CHANGE 01 -210 - 54 - 00 - 5495 29 . 95 INVOICE TOTAL : 29 . 95 CHECK TOTAL : 223 . 84 515004 METIND METROPOLITAN INDUSTRIES , INC . 0000269041 02 / 21 / 13 01 SEWER OP-REWIRED ALARM TO THE 52 - 520 - 54 - 00 - 5444 172 . 50 02 ACTUAL CONTROL POWER RELAY * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 172 . 50 * CHECK TOTAL : 172 . 50 515005 METROWES METRO WEST COG 1162 02 / 06 / 13 01 ADMIN- 01 / 24 / 13 BOARD MEETING 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5412 30 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 30 . 00 * 1190 02 / 06 / 13 01 ADMIN-LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5412 44 . 00 1e _ aCiVL • 1V : IME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER 'RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 :HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515005 METROWES METRO WEST COG 1190 02 / 06 / 13 02 MEETING FOR MAYOR AND INTERN * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 44 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 74 . 00 515006 MINER MINER ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 248710 02 / 25 / 13 01 POLICE-REPAIRED HIGH BAND AND 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5495 256 . 50 02 LOW BAND RADIOS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 256 . 50 * 248733 02 / 25 / 13 01 POLICE -REPROGRAM KENWOOD PORTS 01 -210 - 54- 00 -5495 237 . 50 02 FOR CORRECT IDS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 237 . 50 * CHECK TOTAL : 494 . 00 515007 NEOPOST NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST 022213 02 / 22 / 13 01 ADMIN-POSTAGE METER FUNDS 01 - 000 - 24 - 00 -2440 700 . 00 ' INVOICE TOTAL : 700 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 700 . 00 515008 NICOR NICOR GAS 07 - 72 - 09 - 0117 7 - 0213 02 / 21 / 13 01 ADMIN- 1301 CAROLYN CT 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 -5480 27 . 61 INVOICE TOTAL : 27 . 61 61 - 60 - 41 - 1000 9 - 0113 02 / 13 / 13 01 ADMIN - 610 TOWER LANE 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5480 1 , 296 . 99 INVOICE TOTAL : 11296 . 99 83 - 80 - 00 - 1000 7 - 0113 02 / 13 / 13 01 ADMIN- 610 TOWER LANE UNIT • B 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5480 386 . 18 INVOICE TOTAL : 386 . 18 CHECK TOTAL : 1 , 710 . 78 - 19 - : IME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER 'RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 ;HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - -- - -- --- - ------------- -------- --- - - ---- -- ------ --- - ----- --- - --- - --- ------ ---- ---- - -- - - -- -- -------- ------- ---- -- -- -- - - 515009 OFFWORK OFFICE WORKS 216959 02 / 15 / 13 01 SEWER OP-PENS , PENCILS , NOTE 52 - 520 - 56 - 00 - 5610 115 . 20 02 PADS , CLIPS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 115 . 20 * 217214 02 / 22 / 13 01 ADMIN-CLERK ' S OFFICE CHAIR MAT 01 - 110 - 56 - 00 - 5610 99 . 99 INVOICE TOTAL : 99 . 99 * CHECK TOTAL : 215 . 19 515010 OHERROND RAY O ' HERRON COMPANY , INC . 0068146 - IN 02 / 15 / 13 01 POLICE -DPM BATTERY PACKS , 01 - 210 - 56 - 00 - 5620 200 . 70 02 HANDCUFFS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 200 . 70 CHECK TOTAL : 200 . 70 515011 OSWEGO VILLAGE OF OSWEGO 030113 03 / 01 / 13 01 ADMIN-PROCEEDS OF PARK & RIDE 01 - 000 - 24 - 00 - 2460 65 . 00 02 TICKETS FOR FEB . 2013 * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 65 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 65 . 00 515012 PFPETT P . F . PETTIBONE & CO . 27154 02 / 19 / 13 01 ADMIN- 2013 CITY COUNCIL MINUTE 01 - 110 - 56 - 00 - 5610 171 . 40 02 BOOK * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 171 . 40 CHECK TOTAL : 171 . 40 515013 R0000594 BRIAN BETZWISER - 20 - LIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER Vr - ?RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 ,HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - -------- ----- - ------------- -- - ---- -- -- - --- --- -- -- - - - ------- ----- - --- ---------------- - ---- --- - -------- ----- ----- ------ -- -- ---- 515013 R0000594 BRIAN BETZWISER 030113 - 52 03 / 01 / 13 01 PW CAPITAL- INTEREST PYMT # 52 21 - 211 - 92'- 00 - 8050 4 , 292 . 77 02 FOR 185 WOLF STREET * * COMMENT * * 03 PW CAPITAL-PRINCIPAL PYMT 052 21 - 211 - 92 - 00 - 8000 21565 . 15 04 FOR 185 WOLF STREET * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 6 , 857 . 92 CHECK TOTAL : 6 , 857 . 92 515014 R0001134 JACK & LORI NELSON 022613 02 / 26 / 13 01 ADMIN-REFUND OVERPAYMENT ON 01 - 000 - 13 - 00 - 1371 217 . 90 02 UTILITY ACCOUNT # 0101465930 - 01 * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 217 . 90 * CHECK TOTAL : 217 . 90 515015 R0001135 JOSE AGUIRRE 021613 02 / 26 / 13 01 ADMIN-BEECHER DEPOSIT REFUND 01 - 000 - 24 - 00 -2410 100 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 100. 00 * CHECK TOTAL : 100 . 00 515016 RATOSJ RATOS , JAMES 123112 - STREBATE 02 / 28 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES - SEPT . - DEC . 01 - 640 -54 - 00 - 5492 6 , 039 . 83 02 2012 SALES TAX REBATE * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 6 , 039 . 83 CHECK TOTAL : 6 , 039 . 83 515017 RATOSP PETE RATOS 022613 02 / 26 / 13 01 COMM/ DEV- GAS REIMBURSEMENT 01 - 220 - 56 - 00 - 5695 16 . 01 INVOICE TOTAL : 16 , 01 CHECK TOTAL : 16 . 01 - 21 - LIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER vy uy ?RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 :HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT4 ---- - -- - -- -- --------- ------ -- ----- - --- - --------- - ---- ------------------- -- -- - ---- -- -- ---- --- ------ - ----- -- -- 515018 RUSITYORK RUSH- COPLEY HEALTHCARE 7882 02 / 08 / 13 01 STREETS -DOT PHYSICALS 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 - 5462 180 . 00 02 WATER OP -DOT PHYSICALS 51 - 510 - 54 - 00 - 5462 45 . 00 03 PARKS -DOT PHYSICALS 79 - 790 - 54 - 00 - 5462 225 . 00 04 RECREATION-DOT PHYSICALS 80 - 800 - 54 - 00 - 5462 50 . 00 O5 SEWER OP - DOT PHYSICALS 52 - 520 - 54 - 00 - 5462 45 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 545 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 545 . 00 515019 SIRCHIE SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPANY 0111994 - IN 02 / 17 / 13 01 POLICE -GLOVES , INTEGRITY BAGS , 01 - 210 - 56 - 00 - 5620 871 . 94 02 BARRIER TAPE , EVIDENCE * * COMMENT * * 03 ENVELOPES , SCALPELS * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 871 . 94 CHECK TOTAL : 871 . 94 515020 SLEEZERJ SLEEZER , JOHN 030113 03 / 01 / 13 01 STREETS -FEB , 2013 MOBILE EMAIL 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 - 5440 45 . 00 02 REIMBURSEMENT * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 45 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 45 . 00 515021 SUBURLAB SUBURBAN LABORATORIES INC . 25291 02 / 15 / 13 01 WATER OP-RADIOLOGICAL ELEMENTS 51 -510 - 54 - 00 - 5429 895 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 895 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 895 . 00 515022 SUPERIOR SUPERIOR ASPHALT MATERIALS LLC - 22 - IME : 11 : 25 : 36 V - CHECK REGISTER - - - RG ' ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - - - ----- - - --- -- -- - - ---- ---- ---- -- --- ------ ----------------- - - - -- - -- ------------- -- ---- ---- --------- ------------ - ---- ----- ---- ----- - 515022 SUPERIOR SUPERIOR ASPHALT MATERIALS LLC 20130041 02 / 06 / 13 01 MFT-COLD PATCH 15 - 155 - 56 - 00 - 5633 11226 . 70 INVOICE TOTAL : 11226 . 70 CHECK TOTAL : 11226 . 70 515023 TUCKER TUCKER DEVELOPMENT CORP . 123112 -STREBATE 02 / 28 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES - SEPT . - DEC . 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5492 44 , 067 . 04 02 2012 SALES TAX REBATE * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 44 , 067 . 04 CHECK TOTAL : 44 , 067 . 04 515024 VISA VISA 022413 -CITY 02 / 24 / 13 01 PARKS - IPRA MEALS 79 - 790 - 54 - 00 - 5415 27 . 24 02 WATER OP -WATER CON 2013 51 - 510 - 54 - 00 - 5412 225 . 00 03 REGISTRATION FOR 1 PERSON * * COMMENT * * 04 FINANCE- IGFOA ANNUAL DUES 01 - 120 - 54 - 00 - 5460 250 . 00 05 FINANCE - IGFOA WEBINARS , IL . 01 - 120 - 54 - 00 - 5412 520 . 00 06 PUBLIC PENSION INSTITUTE REG . * * COMMENT * * 07 DOWNTOWN TIF -LOBBY SPACE 88 - 880 - 60 - 00 - 6000 100 . 00 08 ADMIN SERVICES -ANNUAL SUPPORT 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5450 21647 . 92 09 CONTRACT FOR SERVER * * COMMENT * * 10 FINANCE -WEBSITE UPKEEP FEES 01 - 120 -54 - 00 -5462 15 . 95 11 WATER OP- INDUSTRIAL FAN 51 -510 - 56 - 00 -.5620 269 . 91 12 ADMIN-POSTAGE 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5452 0 . 46 13 FINANCE -POSTAGE 01 - 120 - 54 - 00 - 5452 33 . 12 14 POLICE-POSTAGE 01 - 210 - 54 - 00 - 5452 3 . 22 15 WATER OP -POSTAGE 51 - 510 - 54 - 00 - 5452 8 . 74 16 COMM/ DEV-POSTAGE 01 - 220 - 54 - 00 - 5452 0 . 46 17 ADMIN-FEBRUARY INTERNET 01 - 110 - 54 - 00 - 5440 43 . 38 18 COMM/ DEV-FEBRUARY INTERNET 01 -220 - 54 - 00 -5440 32 . 54 19 FINANCE -FEBRUARY INTERNET 01 - 120 - 54 - 00 - 5440 43 . 38 - 23 - TIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER vy uJ ?RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515024 VISA VISA 022413 - CITY 02 / 24 / 13 20 PARKS -FEBRUARY INTERNET 79 - 790 - 56 - 00 - 5620 54 . 23 21 POLICE -FEBRUARY INTERNET 01 -210 - 54 - 00 - 5440 281 . 97 22 REC CENTER-FEBRUARY INTERNET 80 - 800 - 56 - 00 - 5620 74 . 70 23 RECREATION-FEBRUARY INTERNET 79 - 795 - 56 - 00 - 5620 54 . 23 24 SEWER OP -FEBRUARY INTERNET 52 - 520 - 56 - 00 - 5620 32 . 54 25 STREETS -FEBRUARY INTERNET 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 - 5620 43 . 38 26 WATER OP -FEBRUARY INTERNET 51 - 510 - 56 - 00 - 5620 144 . 10 INVOICE TOTAL : 41906 . 47 CHECK TOTAL : 4 , 906 . 47 515025 VISA VISA 022413 -PD 02 / 24 / 13 01 ADMIN SERVICES - 1 YEAR DOMAIN 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5450 11 . 95 02 REGISTRATION * * COMMENT * * 03 ADMIN SERVICES -NEWEGG CREDIT 01 - 640 - 54 - 00 - 5450 -35 . 32 04 VOUCHERS FROM PREVIOUS CHARGE * * COMMENT * * 05 POLICE -GASOLINE 01 - 210 - 56 - 00 - 5695 206 . 02 INVOICE TOTAL : 182 . 65 CHECK TOTAL : 182 . 65 515026 VITOSH VITOSH REPORTING SERVICE 021313 02 / 18 / 13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-KENDALL 90 - 039 - 39 - 00 - 0011 158 . 20 02 CROSSING 02 / 13 / 13 PLAN * * COMMENT * * 03 COMMISSION * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 158 . 20 CHECK TOTAL : 158 . 20 515027 WAREHOUS WAREHOUSE DIRECT 1849772 - 0 02 / 19 / 13 01 COMM/ DEV- 2 STAMPS 01 -220 - 56 - 00 - 5610 34 . 66 INVOICE TOTAL : 34 . 66-- * CHECK TOTAL : 34 . 66 - 24 - ' IME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER 'RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 :HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - --- --- -- --- - -- ------- --- - --------- ---- - -- - - ------ - - ------------------- -- ---------- -- ---- ---- - ----- -- ------ --- - -- 515028 WATERSYS WATER SOLUTIONS UNLIMITED , INC 32739 02 / 13 / 13 01 WATER OP -PHOSPHATE 51 - 510 - 56 - 00 -5638 21587 . 50 INVOICE TOTAL : 21587 . 50 CHECK TOTAL : 21587 . 50 515029 WHELEN WHELEN ENGINEERING COMPANY INC R86392 02 / 07 / 13 01 STREETS - STROBE POWER SUPPLY 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 - 5640 185 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 185 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 185 . 00 515030 WTRPRD WATER PRODUCTS , INC . 0237984 02 / 13 / 13 01 WATER OP-BAND REPAIR CLAMPS 51 -510 - 56 - 00 - 5620 377 . 42 INVOICE TOTAL : 377 . 42 CHECK TOTAL : 377 . 42 515031 YORKACE YORKVILLE ACE & RADIO SHACK 147483 02 / 19 / 13 01 STREETS -BOLT , WASHER 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 - 5620 5 . 04 INVOICE TOTAL : 5 . 0.4 147503 02 / 21 / 13 01 STREETS -CHAINS 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 -5640 55 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 55 . 00 147509 02 / 21 / 13 01 STREETS -NUT , BOLT , ROD THREAD 01 - 410 - 56 - 00 - 5620 9 . 28 INVOICE TOTAL : 9 . 28 CHECK TOTAL : 69 . 32 515032 YORKNAPA YORKVILLE NAPA AUTO PARTS 029434 01 / 25 / 13 01 STREETS -AIR FILTER, OIL FILTER 01 - 410 - 54 - 00 - 5495 26 . 96 - 25 - TIME : 11 : 25 : 36 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 03 / 12 / 13 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER . DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - --- ---- -- ------- --- -- ----- - - - - - - - - ---- - --- - - -- - --- - --- - - - --- ---- ---- -- ----- -- --- - -- - - - - -- ----- ------- - -- 515032 YORKNAPA YORKVILLE NAPA AUTO PARTS 029434 01 / 25 / 13 02 WASHER SOLVENT * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 26 . 96 CHECK TOTAL : 26 . 96 515033 YORKPDPC YORKVILLE POLICE DEPT . 022613 02 / 26 / 13 01 POLICE -RECORDING NOTARY 01 - 210 - 56 - 00 - 5620 15 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 15 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 15 . 00 515034 YORKSELF YORKVILLE SELF STORAGE , INC 022513 - 45 02 / 25 / 13 01 POLICE - STORAGE 01 - 210 -54 - 00 - 5485 75 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 75 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 75 . 00 515035 YOUNGM MARLYS J . YOUNG 020513 02 / 24 / 13 01 ADMIN-FEB . 5 EDC MEETING 01 - 110 - 54- 00 -5462 47 . 50 02 MINUTES * * COMMENT * * INVOICE TOTAL : 47 . 50 CHECK TOTAL : 47 . 50 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID : 326f701 . 25 - 26 - ATE : 03 / 05 / 13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE : 1 IME : 11 : 12 : 06 MANUAL PRE - CHECK RUN EDIT D : AP222000 . WOW HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM CHECK INVOICE # DATE $# DESCRIPTION DATE ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 131005 KCR KENDALL COUNTY RECORDER ' S 02 / 25 / 13 161562 02 / 25 / 13 01 WATER OP - FILED WATER LIENS 51 - 510 - 54 - 00 - 5448 294 . 00 02 WATER OP - RELEASED WATER LIENS 51 - 510 - 54 - 00 - 5448 294 . 00 03 PW CAPITAL - RELEASE MOWIND LIEN 21 - 211 - 54 - 00 - 5448 49 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 637 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 637 . 00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID : 637 . 00 _ 27 _ IAi LI . va j� I / 1 ✓ WIN 11LA✓ V111 W 1W4%I\ V I4j L" L "WIJ 1 IME : 16 : 17 : 34 CHECK REGISTER RG ID : AP215000 . WOW CHECK DATE : 02 / 28 / 13 HECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT -- --- - - - -- - -- - --- - ---- ----- ---- -- ---- --- - -- --- -- ------ --- ----------- ------ - -- - ------------ - -- -- - - ------- ---- ---- ---- --------- ------ 514952 R0001136 ROBERT & SYLVIA COHN 20120522 -BUILD 02 / 27 / 13 01 WATER OP - 462 OMAHA DR . BUILD 51 - 000 - 24 - 00 - 2445 6 , 000 . 00 02 SEWER OP - 462 OMAHA DR . BUILD 52 - 000 - 24 - 00 - 2445 4 , 000 . 00 INVOICE TOTAL : 10 , 000 . 00 CHECK TOTAL : 10 , 000 . 00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID : 10 , 000 . 00 - 28 - UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY March 1 , 2013 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS ADMINISTRATION $ 10 , 297 . 63 $ - $ 103297 . 63 $ 11021 .25 $ 730 . 64 $ 12 , 049 . 52 FINANCE 61858 . 03 - 61858 . 03 768 . 06 531 . 95 83158 . 04 POLICE 79 , 886 .41 2 , 125 .23 821011 . 64 271 .42 61054. 77 88 , 337. 83 COMMUNITY DEV. 7 ,407 . 80 - 71407 . 80 756 .23 544 . 63 81708 . 66 STREETS 10 , 030 . 59 - 10 , 030 . 59 11076 .28 740 . 06 117846 . 93 WATER 12 , 519 . 92 82 . 61 12 , 602 . 53 1135226 912 .48 14, 867 .27 SEWER 61031 . 51 - 61031 . 51 647 . 17 450 . 81 72129 . 49 PARKS 15 ,428 . 33 - 155428 . 33 11671 . 54 11148 .42 18 , 248 .29 RECREATION 91800 . 53 - 93800 . 53 990 . 50 730 . 99 11 , 522 . 02 REC . CENTER 5 , 767 . 81 - 5 , 767 . 81 328 . 47 449 . 01 61545 .29 LIBRARY 157950 .48 - 15 , 950 . 48 11003 . 61 11192 . 54 18 , 146 . 63 TOTALS $ 179 , 979 . 04 $ 21207 . 84 $ 182 , 186088 $ 9 , 886 . 79 $ 13 ,486 . 30 $ 205 , 559 . 97 TOTAL PAYROLL $ 2053559 . 97 _ 29 _ UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL BILL LIST SUMMARY Tuesday, March 12 , 2013 PA YROLL DATE BI-WEEKLY 3/1 /2013 $205 , 559 . 97 TOTAL PAYROLL $2055559097 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE MANUAL CHECK - #131005 - CLERK'S CHECK TO KENDALL COUNTY RECORDER 2/25/2013 $637 . 00 MANUAL CHECK - #514952 - COHNBUILDCHECK 2/28/2013 $ 10 , 000400 MANUAL CHECK - #514953 - STATE OF IL. TREASURER - RT. 47 EXANSION PYMT 2/28/2013 $28 , 147019 MANUAL CHECK - #514954 - CHICAGO TITLE - OSLAD GRANT REQUEST 3/1 /2013 $323000 MANUAL CHECK - #514955 . - SCHUSTER BUILD CHECK 3/4/2013 $ 10 , 000000 MANUAL CHECK - #514956 - YORKVILLE POST OFFICE-UTILITY BILL POSTAGE 3/1 /2013 $2 , 011 . 55 BILLS LIST - FY 13 3112/2013 $326 , 701 . 25 TOTAL BILLS PAID $377 , 819 . 99 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $583 , 379 . 96 - 30 - A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 4.0 Legal ■ Mayor#I Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development PC 2013-02 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Briarwood/Cornerstone—Request for Building Permit Fee Reduction Meeting and Date: City Council/March 12, 2013 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 02/26/2013 Action Taken: Public Hearing Item Number: PC 2013-02 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Cyr o Memorandum ESE —� 1836 To: City Council From: Krysti J.Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director i— (4 CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator 0 F11 dJG 20 Date: March 1, 2013 j� rw Subject: PC 2013-02 Briarwood Development—Request for Annexation LE Agreement Amendment for Building Permit Fee Reduction& Signage NOTE: The following memo has been revised slightly from the version provided in the packet for the February 26`h meeting. The staff recommended water meter cost has been corrected from $390 to $435 to reflect the current cost to the City. Also the building permit fee has been adiusted to assume a 2,000 square foot residence as opposed to a 2,200 square foot residence. Therefore, the sample total building permit fee has been revised from $17,071—to $17,037. Request Summary: Staff has been in contact with the contract purchaser of the Briarwood residential subdivision, Tim Greyer Builders, who is seeking to reduce the building permit fees for the development to their prior rate when the development was initially annexed and approved in 2004. As the contract purchaser of the Briarwood subdivision, Tim Greyer Builders is looking to start construction on the remaining vacant lots but the current building permit fees,which are upwards of$23,000 per unit, are cost prohibitive. The request is to reinstate the building permit fees to a rate near what they were under the fee lock provision of the original annexation agreement which is approximately $17,000.00. The increase in fees is largely due to the development fees, particularly, the Municipal Building Fee which was $150 per unit under the fee lock and is now $1,759 per unit; land cash donations for parks which are $2,756 per unit; and an increase in water and sewer recapture rates as well as the River Crossing fee. Development Background: The Briarwood subdivision(formerly known as Cornerstone) is generally located north of IL Rte. 71 and just west of Route 47 and consists of approximately 36-acres with 18 acres zoned R-2 One-Family Residence and the remainder for commercial. In April 2004,the original developer, Triangle Investments, LLC, was granted approval via an amended annexation agreement to construct 41 single-family residences on the R-2 zoned property. As part of that agreement, a fee/ordinance lock was approved allowing the developer to build homes at a set price and under the same ordinance regulations in effect at that time. The fee/ordinance lock was for a period of five (5)years and expired on April 24, 2009. Although infrastructure such as streets, stormwater management basins, water mains and other utilities were subsequently constructed in this development, only seven (7) homes were ever built and all construction activity has stalled over the past several years. The development had also been for sale since that time. However this past November, the prior developer substantially completed the remaining punchlist items and the City Council approved final acceptance of the subdivision improvements on December 11,2012. Fee Reduction Analysis: As discussed previously by staff in a memo prepared in November 2012 when this request was initially brought before the Economic Development Committee (EDC) and City Council for informal feedback, the City has the authority to negotiate impact fees, transition fees, land-cash fees, and permit fees for each item listed in the adopted fee schedule of the original annexation agreement, with the exception of the Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District(YBSD)fee. Post fee-lock expiration, the current building permit fee for the Briarwood Subdivision is approximately $23,150.00, of which a considerable portion assigned to land-cash fees ($4,392 or-20%) to the City for parks and school district fees ($3,000 of-13%). The table below provides a line-item review of the proposed building permit fees to be extended for a period of eight(8)years: Item Description Current Fee Original Annexation Recommendation Notes on Implementation Agreement Fee School Transition $3,000 $3,000 $2,400 Authorized by City YBSD district fee $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 Authorized by YBSD Building Permit $1,130 $1,130 $1,4001 Authorized by City Water Connection $3,700 $3,185 $3,185 Authorized by City Water Meter Cost $435 $390 $435 Authorized by City City Sewer Connection Fees $2004 $200 $200 Authorized by City Water and Sewer Inspection Fee $25 $25 $0 Authorized by City Public Walks Driveway Inspection Fee $35 $35 $0 Authorized by City PW Impact $700 $700 $0 Authorized by City Police Impact $300 $300 $0 Authorized by City Building Impact $1,759 $150 $0 Authorized by City Library Impact $500 $500 $400 Authorized by City BKFD Impact $1,000 $1,000 $800 Authorized by City Engineering impact $100 $100 $0 Authorized by City Parks and Recreation impact $50 $50 $0 Authorized by City Parks Land-Cash $2,756 $0 $2,205 Authorized by City School-land Cash $4,392 $4,392 $3,514 Authorized by City South Water and Sewer Recapture $1,4147 $1,299 $1,098 Authorized by City River Crossing Fee $257 $0 $0 Authorized by City TOTAL $23,153 $17,856 $17,037 As illustrated above,the requested fee reductions proposes to: 1. Reduce the parks land-cash fee, school land-cash fee, school transition fee, library impact fee, BKFD impact fee, and south water and sewer recapture fee by approximately 20%. The water connection fee is also proposed to be reduced to $3,185, the same as the original annexation agreement fee which was previously approved with a$515 reduction. (Indicated in blue) t Assumes a 2,000 square foot structure and a building permit fee of$1,000.00 plus$0.20 per square foot. 2 Per original Annexation Agreement,$515 of the$3,700 Water Connection Fee was waived for residential building permits for a period of 5 years at the rate in effect upon the original application for annexation to the City. 3 Resolution No.2013-01 passed 1-8-13,effective January 9,2013. 4 Per original Annexation Agreement,$1,800 of the$2,000 Sewer Connection is waived due to the developer granting City easements for the extension of public utilities along Greenbriar Road. 5 Fee amended in 2006 to$5,509 per unit.In 2011,the fee amount was reduced to$1,759 per unit(Ord.No.2012-03) 6 Assumption was developer to make lump-sum payment. Fee Increases @ 6%per year,compounded quarterly as of 1/1/2013 the fee is calculated as$404 x 3.5PE=$1,414.00. 8 Fee increases 8%annually and is due to increase in June 2013 to$277.56. 2. Remove the water and sewer inspection fee, public walks driveway inspection fee, Public Works (PW) impact fee, police impact fee, building impact fee, engineering impact fee, parks and recreation impact fee and River Crossing fee in their entirety. This will result in a reduction of approximately$3,226.00. (Indicated in red) 3. Increase the building permit fee from $650 plus $0.20 per square foot to $1,000 plus $0.20 per square foot. (Indicated in green) a) The theory behind this proposal eliminates restricted fees that are appropriated to specific fund categories (public works, police, municipal building, etc.) and replaces these fees with a higher, unrestricted building permit fee. The benefit is the City has new revenue that is unrestricted in its use. The resulting overall building permit fee is approximately$17,000 per single family dwelling unit, which the prospective developer has indicated is acceptable in today's market and will allow a favorable build- out rate of 4 to 8 homes per year over the next several years. Staff Recommendation: Staff is supportive of the request for building permit fee reduction for the Briarwood Subdivision, as it will hopefully stimulate construction within this development specifically and generate needed development on the south side of the City. For your reference, the City Attorney has prepared a draft ordinance amending the annexation agreement which outlines the provisions for the recommended fee reductions. Staff and the petitioner will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to answer questions regarding this request. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH JAC KENDALL HOLDINGS, LLC (Briarwood—Cornerstone Subdivision) Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois This day of March, 2013 Prepared by and Return to: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois on , 2013. Ordinance No. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH JAC KENDALL HOLDINGS,LLC (Briarwood—Cornerstone Subdivision) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City entered into an Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement dated July 21, 2003 and further amended on April 27, 2004 for the Briarwood — Cornerstone Subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the current owner/developer, JAC Kendall Holdings, LLC has requested that the City reinstate the building permit fees at the time of annexation and reduce other property impact fees to stimulate construction within the development; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed Second Amendment to the Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement and find that it is in the best interest of the City; and, WHEREAS, the statutory procedures provided in Section 11-15.1-1 of the Illinois Municipal Code for the consideration of amendments to annexation agreements have been fully complied with. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2. That the SECOND AMENDMENT TO AN ANNEXATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND JAC KENDALL HOLDINGS, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR OWNERIDEVELOPER (BRIARWOOD/CORNERSTONE), attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the United City of Yorkville. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of 92013. CITY CLERK Ordinance No.2013- Page 2 CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2013. MAYOR Ordinance No.2013- Page 3 SECOND AMENDMENT TO AN ANNEXATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YOKRVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND JAC KENDALL HOLDINGS,LLC,AS SUCCESSOR OWNER/DEVELOPER (BRIARWOOD/CORNERSTONE) THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to an Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement dated July 21, 2003, by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the "City") and Northern Trust as Trustee under Trust Agreement dated September 11, 1978 and known as Trust No. TH 0018 (the "Original Owner/Developer") as amended on April 27, 2004, by Triangle Holdings, LLC (the "Successor Owner/Developer") is now by and between the City and JAC Kendall Holdings, LLC (the "Current Owner/Developer") dated this day of 92013. PREAMBLES WHEREAS, the Original Owner/Developer submitted an Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement (the "Original Agreement"), including a Preliminary Plat of Subdivision which provided for the annexation of real property as legally described therein (the "Subject Property") and the zoning of the Subject Property as General Residential and a Service Business District; and, WHEREAS, in 2004, the Successor Owner/Developer applied to the City for a rezoning of the Subject Property to rezone the General Residential District from R-4 to R-2 and to increase the area of the Service Business District, which application for said rezoning was approved by the City Council and the Original Agreement was amended; and, WHEREAS, the Current Owner/Developer has now come forward to request the City to reinstate the building permit fees as in effect as of the Original Agreement, reduce all required I inspection fees, reduce the parks land-cash fee, the school land-cash fee, the school transition fee, the library impact fee, the Bristol Kendall Fire District ("BKFD") fee and the South Water and Sewer Recapture Fee (collectively"Residential Building Fees"); and, WHEREAS, after review of the application and request, the City Council is prepared to further amend the Original Agreement, as amended, not as requested by the Current Owner/Developer but rather as hereinafter set forth in order to bring the applicable Residential Building Fees in line with fees assessed against other subdivisions in the City and to encourage development and completion of the Briarwood Subdivision; and, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. The foregoing Preambles are hereby affirmed as if fully restated in this Section 1. Section 2. Notwithstanding any provision in the Original Agreement, as amended, provisions of the City Code or otherwise, it is hereby agreed that the Residential Building Fees as applicable to the remaining undeveloped lots within the Subject Property for a term commencing with the execution of this amended agreement and continuing for eight (8) years thereafter, shall be set as follows: School Transition Fee $2,400.00 YBSD Fee $1,400.00 Building Permit Fee $1,000.000 plus .20 per square foot 2 Water Connection Fee $3,185.00 Water Meter Cost At Current City Rate City Sewer Connection Fee $ 200.00 Library Impact Fee $ 400.00 BKFD Impact Fee $ 800.00 Park Land Cash Fee $2,205.00 School Land Cash Fee $3,514.00 Sewer Water and Sewer Recapture Fee $1,098.00 Section 3. The parties hereto agree that except to the extent performance standards or other terms of the Original Agreement, as amended, have been further amended herein, all other terms of the Original Agreement, as amended, are hereby ratified, re-published, and confirmed between the parties hereto and remain the agreement of the parties. The Current Owner/Developer warrants it shall stand in the position of a successor and assign of the Successor Owner/Developer as to all rights accruing under the Original Agreement, as amended. Section 4. Should any provision of this Second Amendment be found to be unenforceable by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining terms and conditions of this Second Amendment to the Original Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. All notices, demands, requests, consents, approvals, or other instruments required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be executed by the party, or an officer, agent, or attorney of the party, and shall be deemed to have been effective as of the date of actual delivery, if delivered personally, or as of the third (3rd) day from and including the 3 date of posting, if mailed by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To th e Curren t Own er/ Developer: JAC Kendall Holdings, LLC c/o Timothy E. Greyer Steve Chirico I6125 Redgate Lane Yorkville, Illinois 60560 To the City: City Administrator United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 With a copy to: Kathleen Field Orr Kathleen Field Orr& Associates 53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 935 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Section 6. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and all documents, agreements, and contracts pursuant hereto as well as all covenants contained in this Second Amendment shall be performed in a timely manner by all parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals to this Second Amendment to Annexation Agreement as of the day and year first above written. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk 4 JAC Kendall Holdings, LLC By: President Attest: Secretary 5 Cp �` l O Memorandum EST. 1836 To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director 41 Fl W CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: February 19,2013 Kendae t°unTy �E ��, Subject: PC 2013-02 Briarwood Development—Request for Annexation Agreement Amendment for Building Permit Fee Reduction& Signage Request Summary: Staff has been in contact with the contract purchaser of the Briarwood residential subdivision, Tim Greyer Builders, who is seeking to reduce the building permit fees for the development to their prior rate when the development was initially annexed and approved in 2004. As the contract purchaser of the Briarwood subdivision, Tim Greyer Builders is looking to start construction on the remaining vacant lots but the current building permit fees,which are upwards of$23,000 per unit, are cost prohibitive. The request is to reinstate the building permit fees to a rate near what they were under the fee lock provision of the original annexation agreement which is approximately $17,000.00. The increase in fees is largely due to the development fees,particularly, the Municipal Building Fee which was $150 per unit under the fee lock and is now $1,759 per unit; land cash donations for parks which are $2,756 per unit; and an increase in water and sewer recapture rates as well as the River Crossing fee. Development Background: The Briarwood subdivision(formerly known as Cornerstone) is generally located north of IL Rte. 71 and just west of Route 47 and consists of approximately 36-acres with 18 acres zoned R-2 One-Family Residence and the remainder for commercial. In April 2004, the original developer, Triangle Investments, LLC, was granted approval via an amended annexation agreement to construct 41 single-family residences on the R-2 zoned property. As part of that agreement, a fee/ordinance lock was approved allowing the developer to build homes at a set price and under the same ordinance regulations in effect at that time. The fee/ordinance lock was for a period of five(5)years and expired on April 24,2009. Although infrastructure such as streets, stormwater management basins, water mains and other utilities were subsequently constructed in this development, only seven(7) homes were ever built and all construction activity has stalled over the past several years. The development had also been for sale since that time. However this past November, the prior developer substantially completed the remaining punchlist items and the City Council approved final acceptance of the subdivision improvements on December 11,2012. Fee Reduction Analysis: As discussed previously by staff in a memo prepared in November 2012 when this request was initially brought before the Economic Development Committee (EDC) and City Council for informal feedback, the City has the authority to negotiate impact fees, transition fees, land-cash fees, and permit fees for each item listed in the adopted fee schedule of the original annexation agreement, with the exception of the Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District(YBSD)fee. Post fee-lock expiration, the current building permit fee for the Briarwood Subdivision is approximately $23,150.00, of which a considerable portion assigned to land-cash fees ($4,392 or —20%) to the City for parks and school district fees ($3,000 of—13%). The table below provides a line-item review of the proposed building permit fees to be extended for a period of eight(8)years: Item Description Current Fee Original Annexation Recommendation Notes on Implementation Agreement Fee School Transition $3,000 $3,000 $2,400 Authorized by City YBSD district fee $1,400 $1,400 $1,400 Authorized byYBSD Building Permit $1,130 $1,130 $1,4801 Authorized by City Water Connection $3,700 $3,185 $3,185 Authorized by City Water Meter Cost $435 $390 $390 Authorized by City City Sewer Connection Fees $2004 $200 $200 Authorized by City Water and Sewer Inspection Fee $25 $25 $0 Authorized by City Public Walks Driveway Inspection Fee $35 $35 $0 Authorized by City PW Impact $700 $700 $0 Authorized by City Police Impact $300 $300 $0 Authorized by City Building Impact $1,7595 $150 $0 Authorized by City Library Impact $500 $500 $400 Authorized by City BKFD Impact $1,000 $1,000 $800 Authorized by City Engineering impact $100 $100 $0 Authorized by City Parks and Recreation impact $50 $50 $0 Authorized by City Parks Land-Cash $2,756 $0 $2,205 Authorized by City School-land Cash $4,392 $4,392 $3,514 Authorized by City South Water and Sewer Recapture $1,4147 $1,299 $1,098 Authorized by City River Crossing Fee $257 $0 $0 Authorized by City TOTAL $23,153 $17,856 $17,071 As illustrated above,the requested fee reductions proposes to: 1. Reduce the parks land-cash fee, school land-cash fee, school transition fee, library impact fee, BKFD impact fee, and south water and sewer recapture fee by approximately 20%. The water meter and water connection fees are also proposed to be reduced to $390 and $3,185, respectively, the same as the original annexation agreement fee rates since the change in price to the water meter fee was recently approved and went into effect January 2013 and the water connection fee was previously approved with a$515 reduction. (Indicated in blue) 2. Remove the water and sewer inspection fee, public walks driveway inspection fee, Public Works (PW) impact fee, police impact fee, building impact fee, engineering impact fee, parks and recreation impact fee and River Crossing fee in their entirety. This will result in a reduction of approximately$3,226.00. (Indicated in red) 3. Increase the building permit fee from $650 plus $0.20 per square foot to $1,000 plus $0.20 per square foot. (Indicated in green) 1 Assumes a 2,400 square foot structure and a building permit fee of$1,000.00 plus$0.20 per square foot. 2 Per original Annexation Agreement,$515 of the$3,700 Water Connection Fee was waived fro residential building permits for a period of 5 years at the rate in effect upon the original application for annexation to the City. 3 Resolution No.2013-01 passed 1-8-13,effective January 9,2013. 4 Per original Annexation Agreement,$1,800 of the$2,000 Sewer Connection is waived due to the developer granting City easements for the extension of public utilities along Greenbriar Road. 5 Fee amended in 2006 to$5,509 per unit.In 2011,the fee amount was reduced to$1,759 per unit(Ord.No.2012-03) 6 Assumption was developer to make lump-sum payment Fee Increases @ 6%per year,compounded quarterly as of 1/1/2013 the fee is calculated as$404 x 3.5PE=$1,414.00. 8 Fee increases 8%annually and is due to increase in June 2013 to$277.56. a) The theory behind this proposal eliminates restricted fees that are appropriated to specific fund categories (public works, police, municipal building, etc.) and replaces these fees with a higher, unrestricted building permit fee. The benefit is the City has new revenue that is unrestricted in its use. The resulting overall building permit fee is approximately$17,000 per single family dwelling unit,which the prospective developer has indicated is acceptable in today's market and will allow a favorable build- out rate of 4 to 8 homes per year over the next several years. Staff Recommendation: Staff is supportive of the request for building permit fee reduction for the Briarwood Subdivision, as it will hopefully stimulate construction within this development specifically and generate needed development on the south side of the City. For your reference, the City Attorney has prepared a draft ordinance amending the annexation agreement which outlines the provisions for the recommended fee reductions. Staff and the petitioner will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to answer questions regarding this request. SECOND AMENDMENT TO AN ANNEXATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YOKRVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND JAC KENDALL HOLDINGS, LLC,AS SUCCESSOR OWNER/DEVELOPER (BRIARWOOD/CORNERSTONE) THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to an Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement dated July 21, 2003, by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the "City") and Northern Trust as Trustee under Trust Agreement dated September 11, 1978 and known as Trust No. TH 0018 (the "Original Owner/Developer") as amended on April 27, 2004, by Triangle Holdings, LLC (the "Successor Owner/Developer") is now by and between the City and JAC Kendall Holdings, LLC (the "Current Owner/Developer") dated this day of , 2013. PREAMBLES WHEREAS, the Original Owner/Developer submitted an Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement (the "Original Agreement"), including a Preliminary Plat of Subdivision which provided for the annexation of real property as legally described therein (the "Subject Property") and the zoning of the Subject Property as General Residential and a Service Business District; and, WHEREAS, in 2004, the Successor Owner/Developer applied to the City for a rezoning of the Subject Property to rezone the General Residential District from R-4 to R-2 and to increase the area of the Service Business District, which application for said rezoning was approved by the City Council and the Original Agreement was amended; and, WHEREAS, the Current Owner/Developer has now come forward to request the City to reinstate the building permit fees as in effect as of the Original Agreement, reduce all required 1 inspection fees, reduce the parks land-cash fee, the school land-cash fee, the school transition fee, the library impact fee, the Bristol Kendall Fire District (`BKFD") fee and the South Water and Sewer Recapture Fee (collectively"Residential Building Fees"); and, WHEREAS, after review of the application and request, the City Council is prepared to further amend the Original Agreement, as amended, not as requested by the Current Owner/Developer but rather as hereinafter set forth in order to bring the applicable Residential Building Fees in line with fees assessed against other subdivisions in the City and to encourage development and completion of the Briarwood Subdivision; and, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. The foregoing Preambles are hereby affirmed as if fully restated in this Section 1. Section 2. Notwithstanding any provision in the Original Agreement, as amended, provisions of the City Code or otherwise, it is hereby agreed that the Residential Building Fees as applicable to the remaining undeveloped lots within the Subject Property for a term commencing with the execution of this amended agreement and continuing for eight (8) years thereafter, shall be set as follows: School Transition Fee $2,400.00 YBSD Fee $1,400.00 Building Permit Fee $1,000.000 plus .20 per square foot 2 Water Connection Fee $3,185.00 Water Meter Cost At Current City Rate City Sewer Connection Fee $ 200.00 Library Impact Fee $ 400.00 BKFD Impact Fee $ 800.00 Park Land Cash Fee $2,205.00 School Land Cash Fee $3,514.00 Sewer Water and Sewer Recapture Fee $1,098.00 Section 3. The parties hereto agree that except to the extent performance standards or other terms of the Original Agreement, as amended, have been further amended herein, all other terms of the Original Agreement, as amended, are hereby ratified, re-published, and confirmed between the parties hereto and remain the agreement of the parties. The Current Owner/Developer warrants it shall stand in the position of a successor and assign of the Successor Owner/Developer as to all rights accruing under the Original Agreement, as amended. Section 4. Should any provision of this Second Amendment be found to be unenforceable by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining terms and conditions of this Second Amendment to the Original Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section S. All notices, demands, requests, consents, approvals, or other instruments required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be executed by the party, or an officer, agent, or attorney of the party, and shall be deemed to have been effective as of the date of actual delivery, if delivered personally, or as of the third (3rd) day from and including the 3 date of posting, if mailed by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To the Current Owner/ Developer: JAC Kendall Holdings, LLC c/o Timothy E. Greyer Steve Chirico I6125 Redgate Lane Yorkville, Illinois 60560 To the City: City Administrator United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 With a copy to: Kathleen Field Orr Kathleen Field Orr&Associates 53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 935 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Section 6. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and all documents, agreements, and contracts pursuant hereto as well as all covenants contained in this Second Amendment shall be performed in a timely manner by all parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals to this Second Amendment to Annexation Agreement as of the day and year first above written. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk 4 JAC Kendall Holdings, LLC By: President Attest: Secretary 5 STATE OF ILLINOIS 240444414464 ) Filed For Record in ss KENDALL COUNTYr ILLINOIS COUNTY OF KENDALL PAUL ANDERSON 0$-2E-2044 At 42:14 vm. ORDINANCE 32.04 ORDINANCE NO. 2004- AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE REZONING OF PROPERTY OF TRIANGLE INVESTMENTS,LLC WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVIL.LE, Kendall County, Illinois,that a certain Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement pertaining to the development of the real estate described on Exhibit"A" attached hereto and made a part hereof entered into by the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE; and WHEREAS,said Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement has been drafted and has been considered by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the legal owners of record of the territory which is the subject of said Agreement are ready,willing and able to enter into said Agreement and to perform the obligations as required hereunder; and WHEREAS,the statutory procedures provided in 65 ILLS 5/11-15.1-1,as amended,for the execution of said Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement has been fully complied with; and 1 WHEREAS,the property is already within the boundaries of the City, and WHEREAS,Owner/Developer has requested that the real property described in the attached Exhibit"B"be rezoned from R-4 General Residence District to B-3 Service Business District; and that the real property described in the attached Exhibit"C"be rezoned from R-4 General Residence District to R-2 One Family Residence District, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1:That the Mayor and City Clerk are herewith authorized and directed to execute,on behalf of the City, an Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement concerning the development of the real estate described in the attached Exhibit"A",a copy of which Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2: That the real property described in the attached Exhibit`B"is hereby zoned B-3 Service Business District. Section 3: That the real property described in the attached Exhibit"C"is hereby zoned R-2 One Family Residence District. Section 4: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. WANDA OHARE Qt JOSEPH BESCO VALERIE BURD PAUL JAMES LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS RICHARD STICKA 2 APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois,this 'day of r . — A.D. 20 r MAYOR PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County, Illinois this i day of 't L A.D. 20 . Attest: ' ^ (r CITY CLERK Prepared by: Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge St. Yorkville, IL 60560 630.553.9500 3 03/ 24/ 2004 16: 57 6305537958 INGEMUNSON LAW OFFI PAGE 08 Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. Clar!/STn�crlernr6ngtneers and SuMr"ra RESIDENTIAL PARCM THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 38 NORTFL RANT 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PPoNCRPAL MERIDIAN, OESCRIBM AS FOLLOMg CONME71pNC AT A PONT OR TINE NORTH LINE OF TCORNER of A ROAD. 1MMCH POINT 15 , 37 FEET EAST DF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER GF HUq�iEb SECTION J ,° 5701MIN THE HEMEA4T �� D OF SECTION >2 TOMNSHP 37 NORTH, RANCE 7 EAST OF INC TH G PRINCIPAL SUBI NON IN T; FEET TO THE souTm*"T NORTH UNE, 1178.50 I =. THENCE SOUTH 11 OE0ITEES 53 MINUTES 1969.4 CMV MMNG SOUTH 11 RM 6 U7XVW M� SUBpINS10N FOR THE POINT of BEGNNINGr THEINCE OMAR ROAD; THENCE NOORETH OEGRM SY MrpRSlug 1�1 SECONDS EASTN ON r NORTH �p THEM NEST LINE of mumolo HTAX ROUT�47N77d24 FEET DEGREES MINUTES ORTH 6B DEGREES T2SW,NU MTK SECONDS EAST 60.00 FEET, THENCE NORTHEASTEHI.Y ALONG A CCE N 1D THE LEFT FEET AND A CNORO BF_ARINO of NORTH 34 DECREES 25 ONO A OF SECONDS To TH V4TM A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEEL;PRAIRIE C NORTH 00 p 2/ ETICE 57 SECONDS KST, 42.26 F=T TO TA POINT OLENGTH SUTTH UNE1OF SAID PRNRIE GARDEN SUBDINSIONi iHENt>: SOUTH ea DECREES 3O dENUTES TO SECONDS 6�T ALONG THE SOU'111 LINE OF $RIO PRAIRIE GAROE?N SUt�1YlSlON, 87&97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KFMDAEL TOMNSfGP, KENDALI, COMTY, tWNDW& AND CONTAINING 18.5 ACRES 1tIORt OR L1:5g. - PREPARED ON FEBRUARY 4 2004, saaoehc=s+x . PREPARED OYt ypLZ�`� r 4•�' CRAt0LO9Y-'• '� d CRAIG L GUY ' •N- Yda, !.0 PRO ONAL LAND NO, 33 No. 3350 OF7LL,'.. :c! ■ . exHRarr 16 739John9nectT'6ln-Wc. R,6o%o anva�mUnrnpNu:erina.com TtlephoneG30,553.756f) Fnz G30.553.CGIG 03/24/ 2004 16: 57 6305537956 INGEMUNSON LAW OFFI PAGE 09 Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. GYa!(/Strurncrwt Engineers and Surur'Mrs COMMERCIAL PARCoj MTHAAT PA O W JWC: �TF HAW OF SECMCN S. TOINNSHIP 38 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF 7NE fHIRO PRINCIPAL OPOINT C3 IENCNC AT A PONS Uj INC NORM LINE OF SAID SECTION p IN ME CENTER ST A ROM, WHICH PANT IS 3J IEE7 EAST OF 71NE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HUGHES SUBDINSION M THE SOUTHEAST gUA ALONG OF EIEOTION 32. TOM OMP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF 7NE THIRD PRINCIPAL WRIOIAN; THENCE 7HE ALONG t1A1D NCRM UNE. 1174.30 FEET tHDidE SOUTH 11 DEGREES 35 WN RIN NEST, RIDIA FEET SECONDS ME SOALONG Tr CORNEA OF PRAIRIE GARDEN MODIVIMON; TMENOE NORTH 1b DECREES 30 MINUTES I( DNN EAST. ALONG 1ME SOUTH LINE W SAID PRAIRIE OARDIN S MLNSION. E75.07 FEET FOR THE POINT OF DEgNWNO; 7HENCE SCUM 00 DEOREFS 21 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST. 4L2e FEh7t THENCE SOUM11EStET3Y ALONG A C9L"'E TO THE MGHT WM A RADUS OF 100.00 FEET ANO A CHORD BEATING H CE S 34 DMam 79 AIWUIE$ ]O "' O n VEST AN ARC LENGTH OF 121.44 FEET; 1MENCE SOUM 80 DEGREES 12 WNUTES 57 SECONDS OF ILLINOIS f FEET . {fgNCE SOM 2 DEGREES 07 MINUTES :I6 SECONDS EAST. PARALLEL 1NM THE NORTH UBb OF ylNU ROUTE 47. 77&24 FEET TO THE NORTH LIVE OP CFJEEN & ROAD; iIffNCE tES FEEq MENCE NORM 2 DE 11 SECOND' EAER, ALONG ME HOR7p1 UNE OF SAID CAEpV BRIAR ROAD. 790.43 FEET TO TH23 E SEIAIVDB EACC 4MO 07 MINUTES 17 SECONDS PC 2�.eK FEET THENM NptiN 65 OEOREES 34 fal�FEET TO THE HEST LIVE OF` IL NOgg 4 � EN 1270ENNUIE IN NU NG 38 SEC 3.j MST ALONG 1HE NEST LINE OF SAID LLLNOIS STMti ROUTE 47. 002IEI I= TO Tta SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PRAIRIE' GARDEN SUBDRA3ION; INEHCE SMIN W DEGREES 30 MINUTES 10 SECONDS NEST ALGNO INC COOUNNUaiINdS AND CONiAUNIN O Off, 6�FM M IKE POINT OF 9EcmINC, W �DALL OR PREPARED ON FEBRUARY Be 20G4.,:n=1fMc. ' PREPARE) Bts LJL LjLNf,S' . � .'`. sAt31.. ?vr •.� .v CRAIG L. OUT r. o.. :a=KO Z7 F . IWNC S PROFESSIONAL LM! ` lLLAjA;:a .: ,. . NO 3330VEYOR :' ` '`t"iri,�.7f ILA mpirrw� 7S9Johm$ueetTQr v:DeJL611scxl - Ttkphcat G30.553.7%0 Fax 630,553.7646 03/ 24/ 2004 16: 57 6305537958 INGENUNSON LAW OFFI PAGE 09 r Smith Engineering Consultants, IOC. LYr�t(/Srrueturn!Engineers and Surtrjrors COMMERCIAL PMCELr THAT PMT S THE EAST HAIJr OF SECTION S. TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF 7HE THIRD PRINCIPAL ATEµ' DI;SROMv A H POI 1T� COMMENCNG AT A POINT CENTER OF A ROAD. WHICH PANT IS 33 FEET SOUTHEAST THE NCORN LJNE OF SAID gE�pH D IN ME SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 37. TDMNSWIPAS NORTH. RANGE fAAST OFD � HUGHES SUBDIVISION IN THE THENCE WEST ALONG SMO NORTH UNE, 117B.B0 FEET THENCE SOUTH 11 DECRY I SS I WNU�PRINCIPAL M 1989.4 o , FEET 1.O 1NE SOUTHMESi E SOUTH OF PRARtlE CAROM SUBDIVISION: 7HENL>r NORTH BB DEtFEES 30 MINUTES IC B NWNOEASHE?#=p�TM SOUTH UNE QF SAID PRNRIE CARDEN Slp'HE" ! 1RTH FEET FOR 30 POINT OF ALONG A CURVE 70 THE AIGNOT EI pF t00aO7D FEET ANp ATs 4t2a nt THENCE SOUTHWFSIE(d r SE OND$ M0 SECONDS YAW, AN ARC LENGTH OF 121.44 FEEL; 1M% CHI spU•MA RpO OF SOUTH 34 DEORma SECONDS MEET. i1.06 FEET . ' FENCE SOUTH 2 DEGREES 07 WNUIFS 9N SECONDS DECREER 12 WNUIEF 57 ME4T LINE OF ILLINOIS STATE ROUTE q, 770,24 FEET 70 INC NORTH LINE OF EASE; Pte- WITH THE NORTH TH86 ENCE NCN DEGREES H IYtNU1E; 11 SECONDS EAST. ALONG THE NORTH UNE OF "D E1FtlAR ROAD; THENCE FEET, 7HFNCE Ndi1N 2 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 17 SECONDS MESr, 24lµ FEET; THENCEGREEN &H R DAD 7JI.447 MINUTES- 2J SECONDS EAST, 40.00 F1E7; THENCE WORTH 67 OECIiO:l; 4 MINUIET BB SECONDS W FEET—" uONG THE TMESTELOIE ��S STATE ROUTE 47: 7NENCE NORTH 2 DECREE$ 07 MINUTES 3S SEW 02 SAID PRAIRIE CARDEN SUSOM90f"OT�NM SOUTH ROUTE DEf�F�S 30 MINUTTEES 10 SECOND iki7 ALONG IHE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PRAIRIE GARDEN SE/BNWSION, 709.76 FEET TO THE PONT OF SEODININQ IN KENDALL COUNTY, lilNd3 AND CONTAMNO 1&0 ACRE'S NlRE OR LM PREPARED ON FEBRUARY Q, 2004 01=141-k- ., PREPARED BY! A$ v, ' ' :>5::.`:.°0 a=•j. CRAIG L. our t, • i PROFE5SIONAL LANH NO, 33 4e � • NO. 3399 EXHIBIT • 7S9JohnsueetYo�/cvcDe. lt60s6t1 �:snirbcngdeeAng.ewq TckVh8=G30.453.7560 Eax6M553.7646 Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. Civil/Structural Engineers and Surveyors RESIDENTIAL PARCEL: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 5 IN THE CENTER OF A ROAD, WHICH POINT IS 33 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HUGHES SUBDIVISION IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 1176.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11 DEGREES 53 MINUTES WEST, 1989.4 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PRAIRIE GARDEN SUBDIVISION FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 11 DEGREES 53 MINUTES WEST, 973.30 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF GREEN BRIAR ROAD; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GREEN BRIAR ROAD, 947.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 36 SECONDS WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF ILLINOIS STATE ROUTE 47, 778.24 FEET, THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, 96.06 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 100.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 34 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 121.44 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, 42.28 FEET TO A POINT ON SOUTH LINE OF SAID PRAIRIE GARDEN SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PRAIRIE GARDEN SUBDIVISION, 875.67 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN KENDALL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND CONTAINING 18.5 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PREPARED ON FEBRUARY 6, 2004. :.;•+++ "^''. ' ' uc . LII A PREPARED BY: CRAIG L. DUY ILLINOIS PROFS SIGNAL LAND SURVEYOR . . . .... . NO. 3359 EXHIBIT 759John Street.Yorkville, IL60560 www.sniithengincering.com Telephone 630.553.7560 Fax630.553^646 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS COUNTY OF KENDALL ) AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND TRIANGLE INVESTMENTS, LLC, OWNER/DEVELOPER, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION NOW COMES the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, a Municipal Corporation, located in the County of Kendall, State of Illinois, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and TRIANGLE INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "OWNER/DEVELOPER". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, TRIANGLE INVESTMENTS, LLC has become the Successor-Owner and Developer of Cornerstone formerly known as the Morrissey property, and the CITY have previously entered into a Planned Unit Development Agreement for said Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the subject real property designated in the attached Exhibits "A" and `B" was to be developed as R-4 and B-3 pursuant to the Planned Unit Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, Cornerstone wishes to re-zone the R-4 portion of the property to R-2, decrease the R-2 zoned property to 18 acres more or less and increase the B-3 zoned portion of the property to 18 acres more or less and City Council has made a decision to accept said re-zoning of the real property described in the attached Exhibits "A" and "B"; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained the parties agree as follows: 1 ) INCORPORATION OF RECITALS : All parties hereto agree that the above contained recitals are an integral part of this Agreement and hereby adopt those recitals as part of this Agreement. 2) REAL PROPERTY EFFECTED: This Amendment shall affect only the terms, conditions, and general development plan as set out in the original Planned Unit Development Agreement, and as described in the attached Exhibits "A" and `B." 3) THE property formerly known as the Morrissey property will be zoned in accordance with attached Exhibits "A" and `B." Exhibit A shall be zoned R-2 and Exhibit `B" shall be zoned B-3 . 4) The OWNERS and DEVELOPERS shall, at their own risk, have the right, prior to obtaining approval of final engineering drawing and prior to approval of a Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat, to undertake, preliminary grading work, temporary detention, filling and soil stockpiling on the property in preparation for the development of the property upon city approval of a grading plan and soil erosion plan, and compliance with all other items required by the city's soil erosion and sediment control ordinance. Prior to city approval of a grading plan and soil erosion plan, the DEVELOPER will submit a master utility plan, an overall stormwater management plan, a master grading plan for the central portion of the development, and a geometric plan for the central portion of the development showing individual lots and street configurations. 5) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE AGREEMENT. CITY agrees that, if requested by Developer, the City shall negotiate an Economic Development Incentive Agreement for Sales Tax rebates for off-site Public Infrastructure Improvements for the Commercial Area of the Subject Property only, if OWNER/DEVELOPER is required to make significant off-site public improvements. Such sale tax rebates shall be sufficient to provide the cost of the Public Infrastructure Improvements reasonably required for authorized commercial uses in the Commercial Area, and shall be paid over such period and in such amount necessary to retire financing obligations incurred by the City, or private commercial developers to provide said Public Infrastructure Improvements, including but not limited to purchase and installation of structures, engineering, and legal fees, consistent with CITY guidelines for recovery of such costs. The O WNER/DEVELOPER Shall be entitled to a sales tax rebate of $ 18,250 as a result of the portion of the Greenbriar road that was oversized as a collector and which is attributable to the commercial portion of the subdivision. 6) AUTHORIZATION OF AMENDMENT: OWNER/DEVELOPER warrant that the parties hereto have full and express authority to enter into an Amendment of the original Planned Unit Development Agreement to which this Amendment is appended pursuant to that Agreement. 7) RATIFICATION: All parties hereto agree that except to the extent performance standards or other terms of the original Planned Unit Development Agreement have been amended herein, all other terms of the original Planned Unit Development Agreement are hereby ratified, re-published, and reconfirmed between the parties hereto and remain the agreement of the parties. OWNER/DEVELOPER warrants that DEVELOPER shall stand in the position of a successor and assign of OWNER as to all rights accruing under the original Planned Unit Development Agreement. 8) OWNER/DEVELOPER acknowledges that the subject real property is subject to recapture for roadway improvement and water main improvement costs along Greenbriar Drive. The sums are due and payable upon the recording of the First Final Plat of Subdivision, whichever occurs first. 9) Current School Transition Fees shall be paid based upon the current Ordinance in effect at the date of the Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement. No land-cash shall be charged for school or parks on the B-3 portion of the subject development. 10) OWNER ENTITLEMENTS : a) The CITY shall grant a credit to OWNER in an amount equal to $ 1 ,800 off of the sanitary sewer hook-up fee for each residential building permit within said subdivision in exchange for Owner having granted to the City easements for the extension of a sanitary sewer interceptor, watermain and utility easement running parallel with Greenbriar Road on real property owner by Owner at the time. b) The CITY shall grant a credit to OWNER in an amount equal to $515 off of the water hook-up fee for each residential building permit. Water hook-up fees for the residential portion of the subdivision shall be frozen for a period of five years at the rates in effect upon the Application for annexation to the City of the subject Residential Parcel. 10) SEVERABILITY: Should any provision of this Annexation Amendment be found to be unenforceable by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining terms and conditions of this Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement as well as the original Planned Unit Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 11 ) Notice until further notice shall be provided at the following addresses: CITY: City Clerk United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Copy to: Attorney Gregg Ingemunson Law Offices of Dallas C. Ingemunson, PC 226 South Bridge Street P.O. Box 578 Yorkville, IL 60560 OWNER/DEVELOPER: Bruce Sperling Triangle Investments, LLC 7512 County Line Road Burr Ridge, Illinois, 60527 12) TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE: Time is of the essence of this Agreement and all documents, agreements, and contracts pursuant hereto as well as all covenants contained in this Amendment shall be performed in a timely manner by all parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have executed this Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement this 7`A day of 2004. CITY: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE By: CITY: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE By:,,- Attes Qom• `"'t Dated: �4•aZ'C�� OWNER/DEVELOPER: TRIANGLE INVESTMENTS, LLC An Illinois Limited Liabili Corpo tion By: Attest: Dated: Prepared by: Law Offices of Dallas C. Ingemunson, PC 226 South Bridge Street P.O. Box 578 Yorkville,IL 60560 EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit"A" - R-2 zoned acreage Exhibit"B" - B-3 zoned acreage ;004 16 : 57 630553795B INGEMUNSON LAW OFFI PAGE 08 rSmith Engineering Consultants, Inc. crrxustirucnenar6�!grneers Rr�isN.raeyvss RES70ENTIAL PARCEL THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SMBp11 $ TOWS41P 36 NORTH RANGE 7 MERIDIAN, OESORIDED AS FCt4.OM CONYENOiNO AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LIB � THIRD PfdNCPAL CENTER OF A ROAD, OF POINT 15 .33 PEST EAST OF THE SOU7HE113T CORNER OF HVI?IES sTJ8DIN510N IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION SAID StCDON 3 IN THE 3Z TONNS/P 37 NORTH, RANGE 't EAST OF THE Tf11R0 S SUBDIVISION MERIDIAN; THENCE NEST ALONG !ST NORTH ONE, 117ILSO FEET 70 THE SOUTHEAST OQtl,!FR OF PRAIRIE �'� THENCE SOUTH 11 DEOREIS TH MINUTES HEST.MERIDIAN,53 CONlM11N0 SOUTH I1 MTo 9 1 STISOINSION FOR THE POINT OF 9EGINNRIG 7XENCE NPoAR ROAD THENCE NORTH So DEGREES RS5 NTST 873 30 PEST TO a1 POINT ON INC NORTH LINE of THEME NEST LINE OFOII lNp�gTATE ROUTE 47. 72&24 4 PEETTt1 THENCE NORTH a9N0 THE NORTH LIE OF SAO FEET. 11iENCE NORTH 2 DEGREES 07 AtlLNUTES 3t SECONDS NEST, PARALLEL 111TH THE SECONDS EAST 50,09 FEET' THENCE NOR7NEASTEIa.Y ALONG A CUg4E m THE �ES 12 MINUTES 67 t7fET AND A CHORD 9FJ1RIN0 Of NORTH 34 DEGPoil:S 2tS YWUtES 30 SECONDS YN1N A RADIUS OF 100.00 SAID'PRAIRE OAROEN SU9DI ITM��TM gEE4 30yMINUTESIONTA POINT DN SOUTNNE OF TONk91UP RENDALL COIIMTY. L Wad$, AyyNO c��rallo°e.6 ACMES iIH�ORTLE�gg,®EG�INNLXO�I�N K DOIW PREPARED ON FEBRUARY 4 2004, PREPARED Or CIRAI CRAIG L OUT ILLINOIS PRO ORALJ''• NO. 3350 LAlra 11hEYpRF7��..r • car i EXHiBq' 7S9John8neetYbrkrDle.TL60560 anva�mllheripNlccrinR.coro TUVI10 e630.553.7560 Fuk630,553.7&.16 04 16 : 57 6305537956 INGEMUNSON LAW OFFI PAGE 09 Smith engineering Cc>nsultants, Inc. GYntYSrnrcruriat Engineers and SurueyOra COMMERCIAL PARCEL: THAT PRAT OF THE EAST HALF OF EECACN S. TOWNSHIP JB NOR7H FLANGE 7 EAST pF MIOIAN' DESCRIBED AS FCUMO&. COYWENEI7O AT A POINT THE ?11180 PRINCIPAL CEFnEEAST A ROM, NHICH POINT IS JJ FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF TH THIRD SELMON ICI Me if1ENCE WEST ALONG OF SECTION J2 TOMNSHIPA3 HOR1�H, RAANGEE'E7 E/4r�T OFD THIRD HUGHES SUBDIVISION IN THE FEET D THE T.SOUTHWEST ALO H N011TN LME, 117a.36 Hp�� NTH 11 DEMEES PRINCIPAL i DIAN; a COHOS EAST. ALONQ CORNER or PRAMS ON; THENCC NORTH ea DEUEEB ES 30 MPIUTE4 if BECINNINO; THENCE SOUTH pip DEp� Y1NU�tFSay SECONDS Ej,g�4y X5.87 FEET FOR 7HE POINT OF 2u'J�MY UTECURVE S ��C01�IDSPoGHT WITH A RADtIIS DF I00.00 FEET AHD A CHORD �F NI Q 3CE SoUiHDE V SECONDS NfST, 96.06 FFEitm . AN ARC LENOT1f OF 121644 FEET 1MENC£ SOUT/I 69 DEGREES NMI` LINE OF LUNOIS STATE R�L 47�a24 CRR ro 07 NORTH t.INE SECONDS 12 WAJW J 37 THE NORTH THENCE NCE N 5 H I or TES 11 SECONDS EAST. ALONG 74E NORTH LINE OF 9RIAR THENCE FEET: 7HENCE NORTH 2 or TIES 07 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST. 24.84 FEET YIHUT@4 2J SECONDS EAST. 4000 FEEL: >S / 81aAR ROAD, 70947 FEET TO THE NEST LINE OF THEIICE NORTH a7 DE 1HENM NORTH 60 Oa69 J4 NEST ALOND THE WEST LIHEUdS STATE RCUTE 47: THENCE N1 67 MINUTES SECONDS EAST, 4J.lO SAID PRAIRIE DARDEN SU90M90NNT�NCEgS0TAT a8 ROUTE 47S J�O it) farT Tt��THEAST OFw SOUTH LINE OF SAID PRAIRIE! OARD�1 M MSIDN, 709.76 TEST TO TiUS PONT CF CO OS WEST ALLOONGty E COUNTY. ILLINOIS AND QONTAMINo ILO ACRES MORE OR Lt S5 or PREPARED ON FEBRUARY 6. y004 ; anak!•. PREPARED BYk M �i! La,No' � y • �AtOL.DVr '•. 4. o-• ?=� CRAIG L. ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAt 7F IL�W . +dn9�rcwv"P . EXHIBIT 739JoBnSuftt.Vc Vffi,. ILOOS6O wnvw:sniWcngdeeAng.Cwq TekPh0ne63O.553.7%O FRX634553.7646 STAFF USE ONLY Date of Submission PC# Development Name Applicant Information Name ofApplicant(s) ITimothy E. Greyer and Steve Chirico Business Address 16125 Redgate Lane City IYorkville State I ZIP 60560 Business Phone 630-553-8869 Business Fax 630-553-8865 Business Cell 630-878-5291 Business E-mail timgreyer @comcast.net Property Infortnation Name of Holder of Legal Title I JAC Kendall Holdings, LLC If Legal Title is held by a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: Property Street Address Briarwood Subdivision Description of Property's Physical Location 18-acre residential development located in the northwest quadrant of Route 47 and Green Briar Road. Zoning and Land Use of Surrounding Parcels North R-3 General Residence District East B-3 Service Business District South R-2 One-Family Residence District & B-3 Service Business District West R-2D Duplex Two Family Residence District& R-2 One-Family Residence District Current Zoning Classification I R-2 One-Family Residence District Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of Property See attached list List all governmental entities or agencies required to receive notice under Illinois law: N/A 6 Applicatioti For Property • • Name of Agreement I Briarwood Subdivision Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Date of Recording I April 24, 2004 Summarize the items to be amended from the existing agreement: Requested reduction of building permit and development fees, and the approval of an additional builder/developer marketing-type sign located off-premise. Additional Contact • • Attorney Name I N/A Address city State ZIP Phone Fax E-mail Engineer Name I N/A Address city I State ZIP 0 Phone Fax E-mail Land Planner/Surveyor Name I N/A Address city State ZIP Phone Fax E-mail 7 Application For Amendment Attachments Applicant must attach a legal description of the property to this application and title it as "Exhibit A". Applicant must list the names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners within 500 feet of the property that are entitled notice of application under any applicable City Ordinance or State Statute. Attach a separate list to this application and title it as "Exhibit B". Applicant must attach a true and correct copy of the existing agreement and title it as"Exhibit C". Applicant must attach amendments from the existing agreement and title it as`Exhibit D". I verify that all the information in this application is true to the best of my knowledge. I understand and accept all requirements and fees as outlined as well as any incurred administrative and planning consultant fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. I understand all of the information presented in this document and understand that if an application becomes dormant it is through my own fault and I must therefore follow the requirements outlined above. Applicant Signature Date THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED PLEASE NOTARIZE IN THE SPACE BELOW: �G OFFICIAL SEAL ANDREA M WEINERT NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF ILLINOIS MY COMMISSION EXPIRESA2116/14 o2-/mot/�D� 3 8 JAN/24/2013/THU 10 : 06 AM Tim Greyer Builders FAX No , 815 78F 7340 P. 001 /001 T. . , G12 i �; Y X51 = 1'� �•' '`:;�� JAN 2 4 2013 1 BRIARWOOD LOT LIST LOT ADDRESS PIN j 1 302 WESTWIND DR 05-05-402-001 I 2 308 WESTWIND DR 05-05-402-002 3 320 WESTWIND DR 05 -05-402-003 4 328 WESTWIND DR 05 -05 -402-004 5 332 WESTWIND DR 05 -05 -402-005 6 338 WESTWIND DR 05 -05 -402-006 7 342 WESTWIND DR 05-05 -402-007 13 372 WESTWIND DR 05-05-254-013 14 378 WESTWIND DR 05-05-254-012 18 1494 CORNERSTONE DR 05-05-254-008 20 1459 WOOD SAGE AVE 05-05 -254-006 25 1456 WOOD SAGE AVE 05-0527&002 26 1476 WOOD SAGE AVE 05-05-278-003 33 309 WESTWIND DR 05-05-255-001 34 331 WESTWIND DR 05 -05 -255-002 35 349 WESTWIND DR 05 -05 -255 -003 36 367 WESTWIND DR 05 -05 -255 -004 37 371 WESTWIND DR 05 -05 -255 -005 38 1489 CORNERSTONE DR 05-05 -255 -006 39 1501 CORNERSTONE DR 05�05 �255 -007 40 1531 CORNERSTONE DR 05-05-255-008 41 301 WESTWIND DR 05-05-255-009 THESE ARE THE LOTS WE INTEND TO PURCHASE C 12 ARE ALSO LOOKING AT PURCHASING LOTS 10, 12, 16, 22, 23 358 WESTWIND DR OS-OS-254-016 368 WESTWIND DR 05-05-254-014 1478 CORNERSTONE DR 05-05-254-010 17 1482 CORNERSTONE DR 05-05-254-009 (23 22 1423 WOOD SAGE AVE 05-05-254-004 1405 WOOD SAGE AVE 05-05-254-003 I i PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL PC 2013-02 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT Tim Greyer, Petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting an amendment to the Briarwood Subdivision (formerly Cornerstone) Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development dated July 22, 2003 and subsequently amended on April 24, 2004 related to the reduction of building and development fees. The real property consists of approximately 18 acres located generally north of Route 71; west of Route 47; and generally east of Walsh Drive in Yorkville, Illinois. The Permanent Index Numbers' (PIN) of the affected parcels are as follows: 05-05-402-001 05-05-255-002 05-05-402-002 05-05-255-003 05-05-402-003 05-05-255-004 05-05-402-004 05-05-255-005 05-05-402-005 05-05-255-006 05-05-402-006 05-05-255-007 05-05-402-007 05-05-255-008 05-05-254-013 05-05-255-009 05-05-254-012 05-05-254-016 05-05-254-008 05-05-254-014 05-05-254-006 05-05-254-010 05-05-278-002 05-05-254-009 05-05-278-003 05-05-254-004 05-05-255-001 05-05-254-003 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the City Council of the United City of Yorkville will conduct a public hearing on said application on Tuesday, February 26, 2013 at 7 p.m. at the United City of Yorkville City Council Chambers, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, 60560. The public hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice being published. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. Any written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville City Clerk, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, and will be accepted up to the date of the public hearing. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. BETH WARREN City Clerk By: Lisa Pickering Deputy Clerk A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 440 Legal ❑ Mayor#2 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development CC 2013-16 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: B.U.I.L.D. Incentive Program 2nd Extension Request Meeting and Date: City Council/March 12, 2013 Synopsis: 2nd extension Request of the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (BUILD) Incentive Program. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 7/24/12 Action Taken: Approval of extension Item Number: COW 2012-28 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Recommendation Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum regarding this matter. Crr o n Memorandum EST. 1838 -�= To: City Council Gl ~ From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator <LE Date: March 1, 2013 Subject: B.U.I.L.D. Incentive Program 2nd Extension Request Background & Request As the City Council is aware, in July 2012, an extension to Yorkville's first comprehensive incentive/stimulus package for new single-family detached residential construction was approved. The extension allowed the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (B.U.I.L.D.) program, which delayed and reduced building permit/impact fees for builders, as well as rebated building permit fees to homebuyers, to run until June 30, 2013 or for a total of sixty (60) qualifying new single-family residential building permits to be issued. The program was originally approved in January 2012 and was initially for six(6) months or thirty(30)permits,whichever first. To date, the City has received fifty-three (53) B.U.I.L.D. permit applications, with only seven (7) permits remaining. Due to the widely successful year the B.U.I.L.D. program has had and the positive feedback from builders and homebuyers alike, staff is seeking the Council's interest in extending the B.U.-I.L.D. for an additional year without a permit limitation. This request would have normally been forwarded with a committee recommendation from EDC; however, the March EDC meeting was cancelled and due to the essence of time, this matter was forwarded to the City Council for expediency. Below is a brief refresher of how the program actually works, its documented success, and the merits for continuing the incentive beyond its current extension. Program Overview How it Works The B.U.I.L.D.program offers two (2)key benefits,which are: • To assist the developer/builder under the B.U.I.L.D. program, payment of building permit and impact fees are delayed until the issuance of the certificate of occupancy on the condition that the certificate is issued within one (1)year from building permit approval. • To assist the homebuyer, the City rebates a portion of the building permit fee, up to $5,000.00 with a matching contribution up to $5,000.00 from the builder/developer, and presents the homebuyer with a check for up to $10,000.00 after closing and upon issuance of the final certificate of occupancy. These incentives are in addition to the municipal building impact fee being reduced from $5,509.00 per residential unit to $1,759.00 per residential unit. To qualify for the B.U.I.L.D. program the property must be a new construction single-family detached structure. "Spec" houses, duplexes and townhomes are not eligible. The developer/builder must provide proof of sale or contract for sale of the lot prior to issuance of building permit, and changes in buyer or cancellation of sales contract must be reported to City immediately. Finally, the builder/developer must sign a "Developer Contribution Agreement" consenting to match, dollar for dollar, up to $5,000.00 the required contribution to be paid to the homebuyer at issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The builder's matching contribution is collected at the same time the building permit fees are due. The flexibility in the timing of the City receiving payment for permits allows builders to move forward with construction without this up-front expense. Additionally, in order to rebate the City's portion of the B.U.I.L.D. program incentive, staff collects the full amount of the building permit from the developer/builder, and refunds a portion of the permit cost back to the homeowner by rebating all or a some the following fees, listed in order of priority, to arrive at$5,000.00: CITY OF • •KVILLE BUILDING PERMIT FEE FEE AMOUNT FOR SF DWELLING UNIT Water Connection Fee $3,700 City Sewer Connection Fee $2,000.00 Building Permit Fee $650.00 plus $0.20 per square foot Public Works Fee $700.00 B.U.I.L.D. Success As stated previously, since the City Council's initial approval of the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (B.U.I.L.D.) program in January 2012, the Building Department has received fifty-three (53) applications for new single-family detached residences as part of the incentive, of which forty-six (46) permits have been issued. This is in addition to thirty-eight (38) regular new home start building permits issued, bringing the overall total of new residential construction permits issued to eighty-four (84) since the beginning of 2012. Over the past year, the City has nearly matched the total 85 new single-family residential home starts issued for calendar years 2010 and 2011. The bar chart below compares the number of B.U.I.L.D. permits to non-B.U.I.L.D. new single-family residential permits applied for between January 2012 and February 2013. In each month, with the exceptions of March, May and August, the B.U.I.L.D. permits have out-paced or matched the number of traditional building permits issued. 10 5-// ■SFD ❑B.U.I.L.D. 0 SFD Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul-12 Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 Merits of Program The B.U.I.L.D. program has been well-received from the building community and garnered significant interest from the public and press. Several articles in the Beacon News, Kendall County Record and in the Chicago Sun Times newspapers have been published about the program (see attached). 1 Water Connection Fee of$3,700 became effective on June 15,2006. The average construction value of the B.U.I.L.D. permit applications submitted was approximately $160K, and generated approximately $770,000.00 in permit fees. Less the $5,000 rebated for each of the 46 permits issued for, the City increased its revenue by over$540,000.00 over the past year due to the B.U.I.L.D. program alone. Consequently, most of the builders who apply for permits through B.U.I.L.D. opt to pay the fees upfront rather than take advantage of the delayed payment until time of final occupancy. Program Feedback Finally, as part of the B.U.I.L.D. check issuance process, we ask the homebuyers to complete a brief survey providing feedback on their experience with the program. To date, we have received thirty-two (32) completed surveys from those buyers and have tabulated their responses in the attached summary. Overall, the program has been successful in its main objective, which was to influence stimulate development in the City and influence those who would otherwise not build new or build in Yorkville to do so. As demonstrated in the survey results, 72% of the respondents said that the B.U.I.L.D. was extremely or very influential in their decision to purchase a new home in Yorkville and 81% strongly or somewhat agreed that they would not have moved to Yorkville this year if not for the B.U.I.L.D. program. In addition, 80% of the respondents had looked at other communities to either buy or build a new home, but ultimately decided to build new in Yorkville. Staff Comments Staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding the proposed 2nd extension of the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (B.U.I.L.D.) program for an additional year without permit number limitation. We hope to continue to offer this program in conjunction with the other incentive-based new home construction packages to spur development in other parts of the City staff is working on which will be presented at an upcoming meeting. Should the Council consider favorably of this request, the City Attorney will prepare an ordinance extending the program for an additional year and present it at the next City Council meeting for a vote. In the meantime, Staff will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to answer any questions from the Committee regarding this agenda item. Thursday, MarO S. 2012 nCOEM 7 City issues permits for 12-new singlewfa m fly homes in 201 Of,th c, ur were issued via city's B U I LD program, official t [[s a Iderme n By Testy Scott isstPance. of the cerAficate of occupancy on the ")nditioti that the cenjficate is Builders h-ave been issued 12 nr-Nv issued within one year from hudding single-farnily home perrnits since the permit approval; �. beginning of 2012, a City of Yorkville &Tfic municipal building irPtipa.ct fee 4¢ official told alderinen Trtcsday cvening. well be reducer] from $5,509 per - + IKryst' Barksdale-Nohle, the city's residential unit to �I,759 per Frsidential - directov of tornn-Punity develnpl cwc told unit; the City cuuncil`ti Fconnrnic 4he uit}' wdj rebate a portion of the Development Committee trist, of that building permit fee, up to $5,0W, with a number, four were as the resuh of the Tnaichirig contribution up tp $5,000 from city's lion- buil�ding inucntiuc program_ thr builderldev elope r, and present the � Aldermen voted to create the Buyers liomchuyer with a check for u tct ; �'` P +.�� opf Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount $16,00 upon istivance of Cher final lUll1 prixrarxr in January, in a lcid to cc rtificatc of occwpia1PC Spark hornebuilding an empty lDcs in the Borksdale.-Noble said that slte city's newer subdivisions. The program anticipates a Total of 60 1075 honies built is only available ro+the first 30 nexw home in 201Z, but said that 15 a CL)nServitive buitd�]P)g pFerrmi5. VArnati_ Accorrlitkg to the oily, the prgi-r•.tai7 TYvrtn I)Ubajsi�, t \cj:uti4'4, lire c:tpi: �r>If • ctitftrw the tsillc3suinr hsPtft}, the Y,�rkvilTet7i�+faiac. let° �trnesrbt �+ -PAymearlt nr budding -permit and U>ipCrration, ;*"PA. 113 IrttVitg,Lhar avr .. imprac;t fees will b+ dflAyed uKil the ca_n rcak r06tliis"ye r H Make' your reservation. for Easter &12-r=Express Yorkville Mayor Gary Galin-ski presented the first btrilclln perm l l5suBd unclear CYCY the City's BUILt) (Bisyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount) program to' Christy Bartlett at last Week's City Council m ling, She plane to build a There's. still time to make year Broadway, All parrieipianis will meet at sirtgle family Borne al 378 Bertram Drive in the Bristol bay Subdivision. rest-i— n atio and hop aboaril Lbc the Nictra s[AO in at 8 a.m. Metra passes Participants can delay payment of building permit and impact fees tPntll the 'c7rlcvilTa Parks antl r eCre3ticfn 3 alter WilI mat lrc ac:tcpicd for thif trip. issuance of a cerfffi:ate u. occupajCy impact fees are reduced from $5,509 E—, -Lxpr on Saturday,March 3T. The te-e is STll For residents. 512 for, to$1,759. Yno will have a snack and drink non-residents. For more infGrIlratlon or awhile you travci it) Naperville to hunt to register, mil Yorkville's Parks and kx e-98s and visit wish the Easter Recreation office at 630-553-2582 or go Bunt y• The trip boards and rewnm to online ttt v+ww.yorkvi[[c:_il,us• A urora',�Wtni Frain Stai1otP.233 Nardi r 16 RECORD Thursday,July 12. 2012 r New- home buying,. building program deemed success 0 0 BUILD incentive spurred 24 permits issued since approval in January By Tony Scott ,progrank ill 1witiary, who said it was Chris Funkhouscr SAid he's nuticecl an 1i11ing ill 10ts,that have N&n Froblems ftwr Trost likely the rttarket th;wt caused the lip ward trend in the ciiy`�.rho[nebui Id! g. the city, nui.mloce complaints, We creed Aftcr only six months, the city of iirc-rlvase in building, nevi the prLignim. "I would like to anribute it io the jo inove this forward. it's M)rkink_Why Yc,rhv'I11e"s BUILT) hornebuilding "It',, env belief drat would happen program." he said, Slop rt��tiv " incentive program has been declared a anyway",he said. LLUry Kot .said tlic program also Pity° Administrator Rare Olson %,,id thk. sitc_ress,and wost alderhFren said Tuesday Howvewer. roost of the aiderrrmen, helped creine jobs in the construction builders and blAyers fill out surveyi fiar atcy'd like to se-e it continue, inJading Rtxsa; Spcars, wvhe voted field. tlht° c ity°, and rhrit he's becr7 totd -l'lte. Buvem cif Undeveloped Infill Lot against the ria osal in January, declared "This leas been a bi-:sut:cess." lie said. anecdotally tr bLritders drat tale incentive. � p �' R p r y° y' i Discount,or BUILD, program %vas tried it a strccees. Spears praised BarksdAe- Kol also said iniplcilirn ing the ww°tirkc. w with :-5vccess in Miinooka last year and N able for 'hringing the prograrti fonv;ard, program at as better than doiit g nothing. Mivhaiel FtamiILon of Fullc H4irnc4 aide, was approved by awC YorkvilJc C"iik� even thou-h she said she wwaws skeptical "Orrc cif the inrirngihles here is the praised the prow-atn, stating thut lie has Council in a split 5-3 Votu in January`, of'[lie larngram a[first. pc�:sitive publicity that this has bruLig 5t to seen buyers considering Etaralcing_ rat the program had two major incentives 1 wvoidd like to thank Kry's.ti for the C ily of Yorkv°illu,' hr salt!, `We' a neighboring towvn% but chow-ing for homebuilticr:� and havers of ntm, initialin- this Program. even though i nol rifting !back and jum %vahitina for the Yorkville h&causu of thir program, l construction,single-tarnily homes,, opposed it-" ears said. mark-el 1, turn itself around- We're This prtar.rarn has worked,"he said. -To assist the builder or developet- madding) an eti'awrl ti) Lurn it:1r0u11d. WC're dAbuilding Pfimet seed impact fees will bc. H Class of i cCtae as L1we 'sirri� ai cerilC lC�tte 171 oca:irpatrcy is issue~i are a li LntC, in!stead of prtar iwi 'Big I f Sery ing'ng' offers seeks classmates� p ol a 3 , w l6c� L . red 1nxper.L0nx, althLLUgh most are done irr volunteer r help from teens T7 35diville High �,clatxhl class is Ire�use. at.cc,rrling to >3arksdaibe-f�nkile, 19"77 35111 t�etrniratz Committee is 1`Ire rriuniCipaJ Iauilding fee wv011ld the. looking for the following classmates. reduced frorn 55,509 per arrit to 51,759 Right rii)w° Kendall Courit+ residents, the prx,Ject and included itt i.lte publicity - Tana Hazard, I.!,,a Knell, Karee per unit as well. according to Muksdalc- local 'businos�;es, churches and vr�uth featured on the website ;end Fauc:hook (Angell) 't-horyipson. Mark. Carroll, Noble's memo. a-Ci t shirts.and banners Ft the kickoff uvcrpCrClt3 banding together land pareliaring � av oriel c to dnC hloQlcz !sari}° celebration. Kin Sandy Kathy l rUrnahs[akClaucF; •Alst�, the kac+rnClauver ww�i11 rcceiw`�e a S 10--spend L jtC day y (Walley) 1 NO rcNw of kip to S5,[}00 as wwell a& a cJraer service rcr-er.s tai ar community. Sherwin Williams illi card Lakeview flrill are Keller,, Rick t s, Sherri 1'ihuck inatthing cororibntitrri of u to 55,000 t' a the first two sponsors for this event- from the builder rardeyeluper,, Tlrev car 11 it"'[7hr Big Day of Serving." Church❑s and youth groups who want Mark kice, I ony Man8o, snit Aridreai The rr� ram was limited to 30 haarne5 I�ens�ill C`i,unti", ni1Ce rile Fastest to be it part of Tht} Big Day of Serving LFCu rlatct Clark. Cu a,lc (Amend Giu❑nzlL4r, p gFO egos COUrtty an Arnr*rica. n1iw has the s b n+i 9 d S i g n u iw or 12 nionths to see. hu%k O'fcc:tik`c it k, a iligltCwt raw of f�wr wl�,r:ure in. Anierit°�, p 630-'768-8102, or Patti (Cut_singer) lirrhir scr gCStcd by Alderman Carlo ww°vw°wv.ihr bigclalyofser +frig cxwafit. N,g;inil,630-552-8(142,.with i nformia t ion. Colosimo al the time. The Big iyuy of serving can bring help Iti the many organizatirwns and families l4r}Sli BarJc dale-(w!c}hie. [ate 4ir}`s whew are struggling Or httVC ntw Ogle to community devt:lL:apnhcnt direcrtar, -.iid }rclp [hem a[l the awhile preparing teens the city' lead received 24 building, perwir for a life of service w send bringing r ryie applications via rile € IlLit prr,Qrsm $s community closer rovether, of Tuesday, Dot! Iv ww°hal she re>"erred to fir, you knraww+ sc:rrrcone who ecrulr! • as "ei+a vcrl land resfs[anse t. oche henefit fra m so me community iervice?It Open Door golf outing set C WrnC buyers and ,ar the slat asked d the may be an i�rgani.tide n who jusr doesn't hcwmchuilder eoannrunrt3`." dirt ill CC! Lh:ar have the budget or manpower to put the City Council. a¢tpre.7w`e C.wti°nti er the twagethCr . play ser ar a part. landscape a for July 2 t Edgebrook program to allriww° for aricaflrcr 30 peEnwirs CDMI- init�� center or clean tip a vacant nr until Jun of 2013. ww�hichever comes aril Many twrganizatis�ns have last farmfunding, In [Lata1, BiirlrsL�ale-hlraUlC said, the cis#` � gr:inl�; aarrtE Staff. 1;r rtatry bt a Area resitl,urat and 4ttr'41nc�ti4es are with .�c`rarrtirhent:il brraikfast ba*ginrrirrg al seni`7r ciiiten whi3 needs a frc5nt prararlt invited to i<atfat:rkene thrr )l OS U;atr' 6:30 a.rtr. The cuss fair a' M gokf. earl. e issued 131 wina�a=-r=hrtirl; fat,rrrti r;�P.iircd t,r a Single parent whin has lotto Tw�etrsre4 at t�pen Dohir'S ?41r1i annual continental tircakFasi, and a1Ll CapanL'b permits (br+tta Lill is am non�F!['ll,f sl ;itA aril! needs a house scraped and BOW. iitrlrnL°:s Mernarial 4 ci1F Owing lunch is $70. 'l`17s: PM Flight will kick, ww latch is nearly Lltn Scene acre cal r4.4 r painred, can �'bredneSddy°- R ly 25 at Edgebrou Gaff at I P.m. anal the cost o1 Fry in Iuder chat wwf issued clueing the eniirz ealel:dar I'll re u sl Ihek for iii err anjxatiort car C..i,utrtr3 Club. Partici cats ore golf. c=art, and Al �s mil`s Jurach y Car[al'2011. q �: la . � � la it p. Becimse cal` the amount of unit tots faniikv ir" your neighborhood, :tfrply ot, ertC0L1T L�=¢d to remcmber tan stcreL cede (beginning at 1 !:30 a;-rrij. With the. ling at wwa wti-hiserL,s .erg ta4 c° jc,J-log r�11 zmd handshake w this bcst hall srrtrzrataJe :wddiiacan 'of the Lexington evening �.encrited. arksdzlle NuthJc srtid rise city hlse ]iii: Day of SLrving button or enwail and 9hl�rgtrtt~dirt t?w•t•rit, b snyuet dinner Ira°either (brine. the room �ancratrri lr� ;idditl�+nay .�00,C1d9C1 in �crh°:ttrlt wttl?t?` rrt:iiL.cr�m sir call f3ti1- The .AM Flight will kirk-oft itt-1 a.nt., cosy is Shy par person, rewcrtue. SIEe said 114 prli earn d,,cs rsiar 1,5_* ,#a. ry t. 1ft5, Cc,rnp9irr�cmary� vemge .ireavailablL• use _11 c[�x!lttrs IS sly. l'eells Wdt It d ittg the vmrk They from Ruin RunticrS 13uClai w.`iitd 1V omn's "There saFun Ic, awe a are king ii led w;-ill be L by riduh who nrr seek vendors bfLveriwe_ catis. Atxo includi&cl ;rte fcyur filar gttjcraJ fund raw grog=are Iwoirar ia5ecl volunwering, their plannin, ahilikaes, complimentary beverage holes; the tip Shiplaw rL [lie c`i[y + l5tirlian rrP tar kni-1w1mi�e, and supl!rvision to %howw' rare r fall craft 111 tyflL,ww°er Club, tJtie C'twilsin Clot,, the So,tDeb wwfi,ch Is +a raatcf tthC to netw to cis seep two step what to do. It vou're a Crti;en Mill Speikea7 y, and Drank Nitti--s htareiehuytr� ns pzri Lie the t3>;11;t_L7 Parent lLaokina. li! tL:ac !art,=ordin's incenhive.' �hc ;wrrrte. "Ili � h your rims the Speakea.&y, arnpau1rtartt:c r i O inu back- tai' helping show Sept. I Sponsorshrps are {available: for tral.kto, the fiends prowled to the tho%,e in need in Lha"II c_Irnniunj1V, t,f p4�rcli;ase, ranging in Price rt m ?5 lrw yitwn7thuwc'r gat tinit L,I" Jiripl tj{wta$sar,c, Clung Lhk'�`aly frOm wideu gainew and TV fire Yorkvilit: Junior wJ,cimcn':; (Tula T3•5tH) -Sl]0nsar:ihips Of ?Sit Lwr retiree rare essentially a parilul rerund rd' rlrc for s day-, cwt f[l: a ww'av tin keoluntcer is looking for veri ors for their 1716 wvi11 haw;°c prominent srgnage at the cw.nt. lwuilditr,g perrnit fee from the leagellim A.41w y°om keel. Bill r)ut a annual fall craft rind vendor shown to eat' All spons.ons wi'iEf be named in the Open rleVt:10Ptr/bL1i1dCF T'fie!>r l unds are held volunteer :a p I,l i c a t i ra n at held Sarurd3y, Snpl. t, fram 9 ii.m. to 4 Decor Newsleiter, the banquet program, ill a separate eSc:roly accoum tiw°Ia cli j4 runt www.Iai-5 rra,ssv;rwrg err c'sll 63{}..55:1-7335. p.m-. in Tmviw Square Park ern ftrmte-l7 and in tire. local riewspaNrs parr ill the revenue collcrted faun real c,�4a.. l05. in 'YL�ri Yorkville. Open !?tsar lien ebilatatitm tenter olkir et�ares. ing. riuscd. n�a taxpayer 'Flhls is an outdoor event, hell! rain car Provides a wide variety of programs to +Ic�llrirs are heir trs4aJ to Cinrinciall} if Vaiu would like tt, help make this adults who have such dew'cica n suppor1t the Bi.JILD prour:na, ,is ii i5 w I- e c°unr pom ibl by rlaanatin 3 antis or shine.iJsacalh spaces ccas4 fy35 l'crr rr 1`h , €h ienral titaidctl." suRplics lift nails arts -llau ds rs. 12 foot.square: space until Aug. t-Afler disabilities cab mental relarda ion. ;atheism, dihmpsters, landscaping supplitis, hirich dial, the to!�t is 5- Tiir. d.cadline to Down's syndroalte, veret,rtil ;psulsy. :and I ot. r flhr our volunteer %orkers on Sept. 15. sign up is Aug. 17, other cl abilitic.s. All mangy- ratsrrrf from sigma rI, banners si) urluji[ccrs For inor+e inforritation or an thi rtincl r;wir:er will tw channelciJ info 'We're making an - effort to turn it around' knrFwv lips ualil programs.. This, p ww�`§Seel t �cw, visit k4waw.lttaa:-rcisa.rwr� fear. a Ircation, cs�nla�et "f'aaresa at tS:�CI-BS=I- � ,' Y I� � year Open Dc,cir t=erse of IhL wlweljiieti ran Ihi; CIq NPunsoryhip rrpticans, email 0877, ext. 3, or ernail wall oral tv rili.w uveFSI30.XI0 ihrough kiwi edi:a:n4aol,vurn for mare sNcial events. grants, and donations- Jr,, Suss AILJeriniii*° t�;ccrrga: Ciit-r}ra jneC�jrefaJasst,r: c�,,rn or c'rill 74DyS-?i3�4- Persons intcresti•tl in sponsoring rye Jr., who voted agailist implenlejwting the 8721 Bus, nes in, tan ba: affiliated with irrfurrmaLiun, golfing should este pin s f€�° Open r 1D or Rehabilitation Ctmicr, 405 S. 1 lk>� these kTC? WLJ12 SL, -Sandwich. IL 611545. Purl hasec may also be made oakane al Amish " a abler" Open L oe,'s wvbsae: wvti+ w,ndr4.ofg. inquirii;s FIRly be d1P trd TO Caiidi ]Maker Happy - atJ 815-7116-M(ih, ma. ??L Y - Birthd%Ab _`_- � ,� Public Notice 1 Th,e VIIIa [of hlillba❑❑rc tma • - hams a�if'inarinv '01.7-.1003 CLASSIFIED Line Ads sail l Wng th,p pmvailing rate 'Monday 5 P.M. i oI wwrsam tar grrs[ivin X to 3aF STERV EN the same as Ihcast� I�1£anGalt courity as distormined by Olfa Classified Illlrrols Drrparra'ameril ul L,ati±r iltarpta��r Ads July[ 1 and Iiie State d Illinois as ❑3 Display June une 21312. Anyono wishing r❑ y 5 p.m. lrtspeM ih ii Ordinajv4 relay d❑ It a proof 15. r so al B455 Fax Raver 37w by ar, noaded a. pLaintmimt oNy. RYA } PAY SCHE3..L Friday at M[raran Jul 271' 'Villar�ge cal I~llitlti lank tCCr?•2�3wSr. I BuYn of the Week: — — ---- -- Monda y at Noon di B * 0 sl di si N Illinois towns eat fees in a laid to lure builders and buyers, spurring t a sense of optimism on growth and rolling out welcome mats to di do di fo in be ti; Y( ` d4 -� d. ur Ru — •Sot �-- e �l'Y .. v_ • a ._.mac;,� - - - - :•IIR _. HEATHER CHARLES/rRYBUNE PHOTO Yorkvllle's city council will vote next week on whether to extend a program begun In January that reduced builder fees and rewards home buyers. FIVE TOWNS THAT BY MARY ELLEN POD M OLIR l 'T'ribune reporter CUT BUILDING FEES It has been a tong two years since the 2410 census proclaimed x A N E ()u PAC=E Kendall County the fastest-growing county in the nation,and today, Co. C p. signs of runaway growth on the fringes of the Chicago area are hard ,._s� r) .._. Cfilcago to find. swgar But they are startin g to rout s p again as municipalities roll out a e rove welcome mat for developers,builders and new residents. .... r Years after raking in large building fees for new-home P r r. a' ,,' construction,local governments are slashing them by as much as 5o Ti Yorkville ` percent. And a growing number are offering cash — as much as 'n ox �� $10,000—to homebuyers to entice them to buy a new home in their lei CO. community,Fitting one town against another. C1 t t S rewood Such incentives are starting to show promise. _ Yorkville, which last year recorded 43 home starts, has already a �" I logged 42 starts this year.A Toledo Ohio homebuilder is interested ' Mlnooka� WILL in taking over a mothballed Sugar Grove subdivision,but only if the ss Co. building fees are cut in half,and its under discussion.Kane County is ( MI 10 debating whether to continue the separate county road fees it GRUnnv IBLINN charge.s builders. rl l Please turn to!fie n CI 11118nois towns cut fees to lure homebuilders, buyers Continued from Pager i lashing fees Toledo has approached the vill about its desire to No one is predicting a Southwest suburban Shorewood has reduced the fees it puracse the 67 remaining return to housings halcyon charges homebuilders in hopes of spurring development. developed lots in Sugar days, when builders were �'. -°-^= I Grove's Prairie Glen sub- practically lined up,check- -� Previous oust amount pm"rce change Fr. amount amount chance division, but only if the books in hand, to secure -- ge Building permit* $1.20 $1 _17 villa board agrees to cut annexation agreements and .- . ........ ............... ........ ............... ......... ...................... the current fees in half waterline tie-ins. But the water tap + $3,834 $2,940 ""That number is pretty results of various efforts are f# ... ._........_ ... .................................. important to us;'said Doug generating a sense of some- Sewer tap $3,834 $2,940 Wagner,Republic's director thing not felt here for a long . .........' *.*. . . ® of residential development. Park donation $89.323.05 $46,67 6 Richard Young, Sugar tinge:optirrtism. ....... .......................... _ _ .._ ...._ .... . . g g "The people who do �� Schooldonatlon** $8a,3P3.05 $46676 Grove's community dev$1- come out, they're serious ;I _ .......... ......... _............_.... ...._.............................._............... opment director, says the buyers;" said Aladdin leas- Capital improvefnent $3,987 $1,400 � request will be "a test case Eger square foot **per sere;differs by subdivlson r, sat,vice president of Mead- ' SQt1RCE;Village of Shorewood TRIBUNE for the village` owbrook Homes Inc., McCue Builders hasn't which has restarted con- gotten any breaks from Os- struction on a subdivision in HEATHER CHARLES/rR1BUNE PHOTO Yorkville borrowed the saw those dollars rolling in, wego for the lots it owns Minooka. Christy Bartlett was the first Yorkville resident to receive a buyer rebate idea from Mi- you wanted to keep it' there,so they sit untouched. Consumers are seeking $10,000 check for the new house she moved to last month. nooka, which borrowed it In March, Shorewood's But in Yorkville,Moue just to capitalize on low mort- firom nearby Manhattan.Its village board approved a signed a contract to buy 20 gage interest rates and resident on roads, park fa- steady and controlled success in Minooka has 36-month reduction in lots in two subdivisions; in lower home prices. From cilities and schools.Fees in growth;'said Itrysti Barks- enabled Meadowbrook builder fees,to a maximum addition to the homes al- April through June, build- some far-flung communi- dale-Noble, Yorkville's di- Homes to start building of sx 000, and delayed ready under construction ing began on slightly more ties can be as much as rector of community devel- roads for a second phase of when the payments are due. "other builders think I'm than 1,000 homes in the $30,090 for a home, and opment"This is just a shot what will eventually be- "Back in the heyday,mu- crazy to stay in Yorkville 12-county Chicago area,an builders in the past didn't in the arm.- come a 379-lot subdivision. nicipalities were really in because there are so many increase of 33 percent from complain, because they Christy Bartlett is among "Success breeds success the drivers seat," Raumella vacant lots," said compare a year ago, according to couldn't construct houses Yorkville's newest residents to some degree,' Nassar said. "They could essen- owner Billy McCue. "I tell housing research firm Met- fast enough. and was the first to receive a said. 'Tveryone looks kind tially dictate fees with no them Yorkville is commit® rostudy Meanwhile, sec- Yorkville's city council $1o,000 check for the new of bug-eyed at the activity. real basis for what the fees ted to working with us!' ond-quarter closings rose will vote next week on Douse she and her partner The village gets a resident,a were for. Now, these mu- Plainfield cut its fees in 13.4 percent year over year, whether to extend a pro- moved into last month. lifetime taxpayer, it builds nicipalities that were once 2010, but the village isn't to 066 homes. gram started in January that The Crest Hill residents up the empty shopping cen- overburdened with core- willing to hurt itself finan- "The timing is absolutely caught the attention of wanted a bigger house,and ters eventually and the buy- struction are starving for it" cially to grab builders away right,"'said Lance R.arnella, builders and buyers. although the cash incentive er gets$10,000." Builders large and small from nearby towns, said director of consulting for under it,builder fees are wasn't the deciding factor in Cutting fees and offering know it village planner Michael Metrostudy's Midwest re- reduced, the city gives as their purchase,the program incentives has required a "Every municipality we Garrigan. gion. "once momentum much as$5,000 to the buyer helped pay for some extras dramatic shift in thinking build in, we are at least Also, the community is starts again, (communities) and the builder matches and boosted their confi- by municipal governments, asking the question to re- trying to keep the new will eventually be back in that amount Some builders Bence about buying in York- which once turned a deaf duce fees; said Maria Wil- activity in perspective.Last the driver's seat, but it'll are increasing the price of ville. Several homes are ear to builders' complaints helm,vice president of sales year, Plainfield issued 58 take several years. They the home to cover their under construction hear about fee structures. for the Illinois division of building permits.This year, need to compete for build- contribution. them,including next door. During the boom times, Pulte Homes, the most ac- it is on pace to issue 100.In ers and developers right The program was set to '"When I was looking, Shorewood increased its tive builder in the Chicago 2003, Plainfield issued al- now" end in January,but since 24 there was nothing going building fees to as much as area during the past year. most 1,500 building per- In addition to the fees of the 30 incentive packages on," Bartlett said. "I don't $25,000 a home. Three years ago, Sugar nuts. associated with building are spoken for, the city think there were any homes "It was like a shark feed- Grove lowered builder fees '%Ve have a long way to permits and tying in to might extend it to an addi- in the process.It was kind of ing frenzy;'recalled Shore- by$5,000,to an average of go;'Garrigan sai& utilities,builders pay addi- tional 30 homes. scary. (Now) I see that wood Mayor Rick Chap- $24,000,but it hasn't gener- tional sums to cover the 'We do see the market people are buying, and man. "Once you smelled ated much activity. Repub- mepodmolik@tribune.com projected impact of a new going in a direction of more they're buying here" that blood in the water and lic Development Corp. of Twitter @mepodmolik Illinois towns cut fees in bid to lure builders,buyers - chicagotribune.com Page 1 of 3 www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0719-battling-incentives--20120719,0,4611677.story chicagotribune.com Illinois towns cut fees in bid to lure builders, buyers Sense of optimism on growth returning as welcome mats are rolled out By Mary Ellen Podmolik, Chicago Tribune reporter July 19, 2012 It has been a long two years since the 2010 census advertisement proclaimed Kendall County the fastest-growing county in the nation, and today, signs of runaway growth on the RYLAND HOMES fringes of the Chicago area are hard to find. 11 Communities in But they are starting to sprout again as municipalities r � roll out a welcome mat for developers,builders and new ;4 Plans residents. Priced from the $100's - $370's Years after raking in large building fees for new-home construction, local governments are slashing them by as much as 50 percent. And a growing number are offering lid 1y1IL CLICK HERE cash as much as $10,000 to homebuyers to entice them to buy a new home in their community,pitting one town against another. jam Such incentives are starting to show promise. Yorkville, which last year recorded 43 home starts, has already logged 42 starts this year. A Toledo, Ohio, homebuilder is interested in taking over a mothballed Sugar Grove subdivision, but only if the building fees are cut in half, and it's under discussion. Kane County is debating whether to continue the separate county road fees it charges builders. No one is predicting a return to housing's halcyon days, when builders were practically lined up, checkbooks in hand, to secure annexation agreements and waterline tie-ins. But the results of various efforts are generating a sense of something not felt here for a long time: optimism. "The people who do come out, they're serious buyers," said Aladdin Nassar, vice president of Meadowbrook Homes Inc., which has restarted construction on a subdivision in Minooka. Consumers are seeking to capitalize on low mortgage interest rates and lower home prices. From April through June,building began on slightly more than 1,000 homes in the 12-county Chicago area, an increase of 33 percent from a year ago, according to housing research firm Metrostudy. Meanwhile, second-quarter closings rose 13.4 percent year over year, to 966 homes. "The timing is absolutely right," said Lance Ramella, director of consulting for Metrostudy's Midwest region. "Once momentum starts again, (communities)will eventually be back in the driver's seat,but it'll http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0719-battling-incentives--20120719,0,345... 7/19/2012 Illinois towns cut fees in bid to lure builders,buyers - chicagotribune.com Page 2 of 3 take several years. They need to compete for builders and developers right now." In addition to the fees associated with building permits and tying in to utilities,builders pay additional sums to cover the projected impact of a new resident on roads,park facilities and schools. Fees in some far-flung communities can be as much as $30,000 for a home, and builders in the past didn't complain, because they couldn't construct houses fast enough. Yorkville's city council will vote next week on whether to extend a program started in January that caught the attention of builders and buyers. Under it, builder fees are reduced, the city gives as much as $5,000 to the buyer and the builder matches that amount. Some builders are increasing the price of the home to cover their contribution. The program was set to end in January, but since 24 of the 30 incentive packages are spoken for, the city might extend it to an additional 30 homes. "We do see the market going in a direction of more steady and controlled growth," said Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Yorkville's director of community development. "This is just a shot in the arm." Christy Bartlett is among Yorkville's newest residents and was the first to receive a $10,000 check for the new house she and her partner moved into last month. The Crest Hill residents wanted a bigger house, and although the cash incentive wasn't the deciding factor in their purchase, the program helped pay for some extras and boosted their confidence about buying in Yorkville. Several homes are under construction near them, including next door. "When I was looking, there was nothing going on," Bartlett said. "I don't think there were any homes in the process. It was kind of scary. (Now) I see that people are buying, and they're buying here." Yorkville borrowed the buyer rebate idea from Minooka, which borrowed it from nearby Manhattan. Its success in Minooka has enabled Meadowbrook Homes to start building roads for a second phase of what will eventually become a 379-lot subdivision. "Success breeds success to some degree,"Nassar said. "Everyone looks kind of bug-eyed at the activity. The village gets a resident, a lifetime taxpayer, it builds up the empty shopping centers eventually and the buyer gets $10,000." Cutting fees and offering incentives has required a dramatic shift in thinking by municipal governments, which once turned a deaf ear to builders' complaints about fee structures. During the boom times, Shorewood increased its building fees to as much as $25,000 a home. "It was like a shark feeding frenzy," recalled Shorewood Mayor Rick Chapman. "Once you smelled that blood in the water and saw those dollars rolling in, you wanted to keep it." In March, Shorewood's village board approved a 36-month reduction in builder fees, to a maximum of $14,000, and delayed when the payments are due. "Back in the heyday, municipalities were really in the drivers seat," Ramella said. "They could essentially dictate fees with no real basis for what the fees were for. Now, these municipalities that were http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0719-battling-incentives--20120719,0,345... 7/19/2012 Illinois towns cut fees in bid to lure builders,buyers - chicagotribune.com Page 3 of 3 once overburdened with construction are starving for it." Builders large and small know it. "Every municipality we build in, we are at least asking the question to reduce fees," said Maria Wilhelm, vice president of sales for the Illinois division of Pulte Homes, the most active builder in the Chicago area during the past year. Three years ago, Sugar Grove lowered builder fees by $5,000, to an average of$20,000, but it hasn't generated much activity. Republic Development Corp. of Toledo has approached the village about its desire to purchase the 67 remaining developed lots in Sugar Grove's Prairie Glen subdivision, but only if the village board agrees to cut the current fees in half. "That number is pretty important to us," said Doug Wagner, Republic's director of residential development. Richard Young, Sugar Grove's community development director, says the request will be "a test case for the village." McCue Builders hasn't gotten any breaks from Oswego for the lots it owns there, so they sit untouched. But in Yorkville, McCue just signed a contract to buy 20 lots in two subdivisions, in addition to the homes already under construction. "Other builders think I'm crazy to stay in Yorkville because there are so many vacant lots," said company owner Billy McCue. "I tell them Yorkville is committed to working with us." Plainfield cut its fees in 2010, but the village isn't willing to hurt itself financially to grab builders away from nearby towns, said village planner Michael Garrigan. Also, the community is trying to keep the new activity in perspective. Last year, Plainfield issued 58 building permits. This year, it is on pace to issue 100. In 2003, Plainfield issued almost 1,500 building permits. "We have a long way to go," Garrigan said. mepodmolik(a),tribune.com Twitter @mepodmolik Copyright© 2012, Chicago Tribune http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0719-battling-incentives--20120719,0,345... 7/19/2012 Print Story Page 1 of 1 beaconnews Yorkville ready to extend home-buyer incentive By Steve Lord slord@strnedianetwork.com Last Modified: Jul 13,2012 02:23AM YORKVILLE–The city and local builders will continue to offer a$10,000 incentive to anyone who wants to build a new house here. Aldermen support extending the BUILD program,which offers the incentive,through June 2013. They will take a formal vote on the extension July 24,but a consensus of the City Council this week said they would approve it. The BUILD program began this year with the city setting aside a maximum of 30 building permits for it. Under the program,the city agrees to rebate back a portion of the building permit fee up to $5,000, and the builder agrees to match the $5,000 in payment to the homebuyer. The agreement is made at the time the building permit is issued; developers are not allowed to build spec houses as part of the program. The homebuyer gets the$10,000 check at the time the occupancy permit is issued. As of this week,the city had issued 24 of the allowable 30 permits for this year,with two more in the works, according to Krysti Barksdale-Noble,community development director. Noble said city officials still are awaiting results of a BUILD survey of each homebuyer,but said BUILD has resulted in more permits this year than all of last year. She also said the program has brought in an estimated $200,000 to the city,not to mention building jobs. The program also is working to fill in lots already platted in the city but not built on. Noble said that between 13 or 14 of the permits were pulled by Pulte, developers of several subdivisions in the city,including the unfinished Bristol Bay. The other permits were pulled by smaller, custom builders. Alderman Larry Kot,2nd Ward, called the program a"win-win situation."He said in addition to the money,jobs and new residents,the program also has given the city"positive publicity." "It says we're a progressive city,that we're not just sitting back and waiting for the market to change,"he said. Michael Hamilton,representing Pulte,told aldermen"the program has worked." "We've had people who were considering other communities come to Yorkville,"he said. Copyright©2012—Sun-Times Media,LLC http:/ibeaconnews.suntimes.com/news/13742694-418/yorkville-ready-to-extend-home-buy... 7/13/2012 rnn[ story Page I of 3 beaconnews Yorkville: $10,000 incentive for people to build, buy houses By Steve Lord slord@stmedianetwork.com Last Modified: Jan 12, 2012 07:54AM YORKVILLE--The city will be offering a financial incentive to entice people to build new homes in Yorkville during the next year. The program, narrowly approved by the City Council this week, will feature a $10,000 payment to new homeowners at the time they occupy the new house. The money will come from a fund that both the city and developers who take advantage of the program contribute to. The city's share for each home would be the amount paid for permit fees up to $5,000; the developer would match that. In addition, the city would have permit and impact fees paid at the time of the certificate of occupancy, rather than prior to construction. That would allow the builder flexibility to move forward with construction without incurring the fee up front. The city also is proposing a reduction in the current municipal building fee from $5,509 to $1,759. When the new homebuyer occupies the house, they receive a check for$10,000. City officials proposed the program to try to get some action going on the almost 9,000 platted but vacant lots throughout the city. Any developer in any subdivision can take advantage of the program. The program will be limited to 30 lots and to the next 12 months. City officials will review how the program worked after that to see if they should consider doing it for another year. Modeled on Minooka Yorkville officials got the idea for the program from the nearby village of Minooka, where a similar program worked for the past year. Minooka entered into a similar deal with Meadowbrook Homes Inc., developers of Arbor Lakes. Alladin Nassar, Meadowbrook Homes vice president, said the program was responsible for the developer building 49 new homes during the second half of 2010 and during 2011, after selling "a whopping zero homes"between 2008 and mid-2010. "Before then, we had sold about 80 homes a year,"he said. Nassar said his company also discounted prices, offering a four-bedroom, 2w-bath house for$169,900. http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/9953448-417/yorkville-10000-incentive-for-people-to-bu... 1/12/2012 rLI11L Jtury Page 2 of'3 With the program, the homebuyer ended up paying $159,900. Builder eyes Yorkville Nassar said his company is looking at some lots in two different Yorkville subdivisions. He said the program likely would work better in Yorkville,because Yorkville has better business infrastructure and demographics than Minooka. Nassar said his company likely would charge between $180,000 and $190,000 in Yorkville. "Yorkville has a lot of things going for it,"he said. Nassar said for the small, paper cost of permit fees, the city would gain new residents who spend money in town and support the businesses. They also will pay property taxes into the tax base. "You give us a little in permit fees upfront, but get the increased tax base, long-term," he said. The Yorkville council voted 5-3 in support of the program. The three dissenters were Aldermen Carlo Colosimo, George Gilson and Rose Spears. Gilson said the only things that will bring homebuilding back are markets, the economy and demographics. He said the city has"been stung"by deals offered to developers in the past. "All these deals struck in the past with developers have hurt us," he said. "The real developers, the solid ones, are positioning themselves now to be in a good position when the economy rebounds." `Got to do something' Another developer, Bill McCue, of McCue Builders, said the only way Yorkville can sustain and grow its business community is "through rooftops." He said the average house brings $160,000 to a community. "This is a long haul situation," he said. "You watch, fees are going to be dropping everywhere. This is going to be great for everybody." Lynn Dubajic, Yorkville Economic Development Corporation director, said this kind of stimulus program helps in marketing to retail businesses looking to locate in Yorkville. "1f we're not doing something out of the box, they will just look at the towns getting rooftops built," she said. Mayor Gary Golinski, along with five other aldermen, said the program would be a sign Yorkville is doing something. "We have too many vacant lots," said Alderman Marty Munns, 3rd Ward. "We've got to do something." Copyright 0 2012— Sun-Times Media, LLC http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/9953448-417/yorkville-I 0000-incentive-for-people-to-bu... 1/12/2012 Print Story Page 1 of 3 beaconnews Yorkville: $10,000 incentive for people to build, buy houses By Steve Lord slord@stmedianetwork.com Last Modified: Mar 24, 2012 11:41 PM YORKVILLE The city will be offering a financial incentive to entice people to build new homes in Yorkville during the next year. The program, narrowly approved by the City Council this week,will feature a $10,000 payment to new homeowners at the time they occupy the new house. The money will come from a fund that both the city and developers who take advantage of the program contribute to. The city's share for each home would be the amount paid for permit fees up to $5,000; the developer would match that. In addition, the city would have permit and impact fees paid at the time of the certificate of occupancy, rather than prior to construction. That would allow the builder flexibility to move forward with construction without incurring the fee up front. The city also is proposing a reduction in the current municipal building fee from $5,509 to $1,759. When the new homebuyer occupies the house, they receive a check for$10,000. City officials proposed the program to try to get some action going on the almost 9,000 platted but vacant lots throughout the city. Any developer in any subdivision can take advantage of the program. The program will be limited to 30 lots and to the next 12 months. City officials will review how the program worked after that to see if they should consider doing it for another year. Modeled on Minooka Yorkville officials got the idea for the program from the nearby village of Minooka, where a similar program worked for the past year. Minooka entered into a similar deal with Meadowbrook Homes Inc., developers of Arbor Lakes. Alladin Nassar, Meadowbrook Homes vice president, said the program was responsible for the developer building 49 new homes during the second half of 2010 and during 2011, after selling "a whopping zero homes"between 2008 and mid-2010. "Before then, we had sold about 80 homes a year,"he said. Nassar said his company also discounted prices, offering a four-bedroom, 2oe-bath house for$169,900. http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/9953448-418/yorkville-to-try-incentive-to-get-peop... 7/17/2012 Print Story Page 2 of 3 With the program, the homebuyer ended up paying $159,900. Builder eyes Yorkville Nassar said his company is looking at some lots in two different Yorkville subdivisions. He said the program likely would work better in Yorkville, because Yorkville has better business infrastructure and demographics than Minooka.Nassar said his company likely would charge between $180,000 and $190,000 in Yorkville. "Yorkville has a lot of things going for it,"he said. Nassar said for the small,paper cost of permit fees, the city would gain new residents who spend money in town and support the businesses. They also will pay property taxes into the tax base. "You give us a little in permit fees upfront, but get the increased tax base, long-term,"he said. The Yorkville council voted 5-3 in support of the program. The three dissenters were Aldermen Carlo Colosimo, George Gilson and Rose Spears. Gilson said the only things that will bring homebuilding back are markets, the economy and demographics. He said the city has "been stung"by deals offered to developers in the past. "All these deals struck in the past with developers have hurt us,"he said. "The real developers, the solid ones, are positioning themselves now to be in a good position when the economy rebounds." `Got to do something' Another developer, Bill McCue, of McCue Builders, said the only way Yorkville can sustain and grow its business community is "through rooftops."He said the average house brings $160,000 to a community. "This is a long haul situation,"he said. "You watch, fees are going to be dropping everywhere. This is going to be great for everybody." Lynn Dubajic, Yorkville Economic Development Corporation director, said this kind of stimulus program helps in marketing to retail businesses looking to locate in Yorkville. "If we're not doing something out of the box, they will just look at the towns getting rooftops built," she said. Mayor Gary Golinski, along with five other aldermen, said the program would be a sign Yorkville is doing something. "We have too many vacant lots," said Alderman Marty Munns, 3rd Ward. "We've got to do something." Copyright© 2012 Sun-Times Media, LLC http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/9953448-418/yorkville-to-try-incentive-to-get-peop... 7/17/2012 'F(RM 60560 1535102-28-13 42W 134P 6N CITY OF YORKVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 800 GAME FARM RD yORK\f111-E(I 3"3 Bringing you all the news of Kendall County Since 1864 In this issue: YHS girls' ll C 75¢ team beats Kendall County Dixon 60-26... ...see Sports Thursday, Dec. 6, 2012 John Shaw is Vol. 148 No. 49 new chairman ]RECORD 96 pages, 5 sections of Co. Board... Published at Yorkville IL 60560 ,,,see page 2 @Copyright 2012,Kendall County Record Inc ya Home building incentive program gets rave reviews Ilk 1 1 Mwti 11 1(rol,) d By Tony Scott 2009, 42 in 2010, and 43 in 2011, 1 according to the survey. The City of Yorkville's home building Barksdale-Noble said the city has so r x incentive program seems to be popular far issued 36 permits that qualify for the f,. with those who choose to use it, a city BUILD program since it started in official told aldermen Tuesday. January. Kgsti Barksdale-Noble, the city's "As part of the issuance process, we ♦ community development director, shared ask the homebuyers to complete a brief the results of a recent survey of those survey providing feedback on their who chose to build homes here in experience with the program. To date, Yorkville via the Buyers of Undeveloped we have received 23 completed surveys Infill Lot Discount (BUILD) program from those buyers," she said in her with the City Council's Economic memo. Development Committee. The city Of those surveyed, 42 percent said the Quality time with Santa: Arie Mejia, 19 months, daughter of Anna Meija of received 23 surveys back from the 50 BUILD program was "extremely Yorkville, has a chat with Santa Claus at the Lyon Farm's Christmas event distributed. influential"in their decision to buy a new Sunday. Visitors could take a hayride, try roasted chestnuts, view antiques and The City Council in July voted to home in Yorkville, with 25 percent visit with the big guy. Lyon Farm will be open with the same activities this extend the program for another 30 saying it was"very influential." Sunday, Dec. 9, from 1 to 4 p.m. at 7935 Route 71 in Yorkville. More photos in building permits or for one year, Most of the people surveyed said the Countywide section. (Record Photo by Joanne Pleskovieh) whichever occurred first. they'd heard about the program from • The program gave the following their builder (73 percent), while others Loaningmoney for Lisbon incentives for those applying for new said they read about it in the newspaper single family home permits, according to (14 percent), and others said they heard sewer not legal, county told the city website about t from a friend (9 percent). Four m •Payent of building permit and percent said they read about it on the impact fees will be delayed until the -city's website. Has no authority to lend money issuance of the certificate of occupancy Of those surveyed, 91 percent said on the condition that the .certificate is they'd recommend the program to a - issued within one year from building friend. Most of those surveyed said they By Matt Sehury you to do that. I wish I had better news permit approval; planned to spend their incentive money for you. 1 know this is not a popular -The municipal building impact fee on furniture or other goods (42 percent), The Kendall County Board can lend answer to tell you." will be reduced from $5,509 per while others said they would save and money to the Village of Lisbon to build a Weis explained that under state statute residential unit to $1,759 per residential invest it (24 percent), use it toward debt wastewater treatment plant but it won't the county doesn't have the authority to unit; or other bills (17 percent), or"other" (17 be legal, County State's Attorney Eric lend the money. -The city will rebate a portion of the percent). Weis told the board Tuesday night. He added that if the board decided to building permit fee, up to $5,000 with a During a discussion on the survey, Weis said he and Assistant State's lend the money to Lisbon anyway he matching contribution up to $5,000 from Alderman Carlo Colosimo said one of jAttorney David Berault have been couldn't stop them but there would be no the builder/developer, and present the the questions was worded in a confusing working on the agreement with the far °uarantee a contract cold provide that the homebuyer with a check for up to way. The question was: "Do you agree southern Kendall County town and board would get it's money back. $10,000 upon issuance of the final you would have moved to Yorkville this haven't found legal way for the county to "I don't have a good legal recourse to certificate of occupancy. year if not for the B.U.I.L.D. program?" the funds the village requested in get it back from them if they don't pay The city has issued 69 total building Barksdale-Noble agreed, and said city October. it,"Weis said. permits for single family homes so far staff had contacted two random "We have come to the conclusion that Lisbon had come before the County this year, which is more than the respondents to ensure that they meant there is no good way for us to do this," Board two months ago asking for a loan individual totals of the past three years: that they moved to Yorkville because of Weis said. `7 cannot find a legal way for continued on page 3 there were 56 such permits issued in the program. s 3x Former State's ! Attorney now ' chief judge of wY new circuit: 1 a 1W ..- Judge Timothy J. McCann of Oswego, second from left, a former ' Kendall County State's Attorney, was unanimously elected chief judge of the new 23rd Judicial v Circuit Monday in Yorkville by his - fellow judges in the circuit, which includes Kendall and DeKalb coun- ties. From left are Judges Melissa a Barnhart, Robert Pilmer,Thomas Doherty, Robbin Stocked:and Ronald Matekaitis. (Record Photo ° by Eric Miller) r r / ; 11 � • Bringing°you all fhe news of Kendall County Since 1864 1 y � ` �yva «�"'� yx"s5 � `� - • - • . - • • v ' 111 . • • ' - • • . y4''yx"^`��° ` � ' +. v • • . . • • • _ _ • • • • e • 111 v - • • . • • • dill Pill dm g� • • • • . • .• . ' r • - • • - • • - • - • • • - • . Pill lgN ,: � ,zxt`�; • \ , / • • • • - • ' 1 111 • ' 1 111 ,- • ' • - \ • • ' . • • 1 • 1 1 � 1 1 (-i A -r#*6r x _ _ - _ _ _ • 111 • • v - _ t �;�. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • . • . . '< . .• raw • • • . r • ' • - • - . - v 611P, • \ �J • A • 1 . • ¢yn • . _ • - • • A • • • 1 • . J PP _ • -• , - • • • . . 1 • - • - • • • - MEMO= PPti • • • . • • • _ • • • - ' _ • • - • • • • • • • ' • r - • ' • • • • ' • • - • ' • • • • • v ` - -.: a.....�,..- .— ;" .3 PP `Y: 1 �5 1 ,L a ,- IV 7i PP VP! Iy Inn 21W 1.6 • 1 1 1 • 1 1 6 e y - " � Yg7 • • r� ! . �'ll r `� t • • 1 ��' L.v • - • . • • \ r ..r'�•'"qR�' � v u ' • ..; °�xr,. .r iYSai',. ,r, qd: ,.'�i ` �'dt „"v„ i'�c��Gr"�'vt�r<a .j, � ^,a"""�t£ �' Thursday, Jan. 12, 2012 RECORD 7 Riemenschneider a New Construction County files suit to sieze • Service Upgrades Electr�e _ Electric,, Inc. • Remodeling$ 60,000 from traffic stop Residential �° _ • Bucket Truck Service By Matt SChUry According to the court case, the cash _ y • Repairs was transported or attempted to be - Illinois State Police seized one of the transported knowing or having reason to y��' largest amounts of money in Kendal] - -�I g Y know that the financial: transaction is �` County's history in November. designed to avoid a transaction report Licensed * Bonded Insured . State Police seized $63 ,630 in cash requirement under federal law." following the arrest of Alexander Shaia; The cash' was seized under the drug Verne Riemenschneider • Scott Riemenschneider 25, of Pam Street, Eugene, Ore as he was asset forfeiture 'laws, according - to traveling west bound on I-80 near Assistant State's Attorney Frank Gorup, L�O��S�G Minooka. He — was charged with because there was suspicion the money 6 _ V possession of a controlled-`sdbstance, I8 may have been-tied'to dnigs: . ' capsules of Adderall, on Nov. 7. "A forfeiture arose against the U.S. 1212 Badger St. , Box 491 , Yorkville, IL 60560 A complaint of forfeiture was filed in currency," Pencyla said. Basically any Kendall County Court in addition to amount that is done in this manner, as criminal drug charges. Shaia posted long as it fits the requirements of the � $50,000 bond. statute, would be considered a forfeitable "Only one person (Shaia) has been . amount. 'It doesn't change ' by the charged," Assistant State's Attorneys amount ,, Try before you buy , Nemura Pencyla said e , AccordlrN W. ",_ b4w"If 1P� . t Two other individuals in the car with wins the cavt case th ney vY L e `' Shaia were not chazged sp7aYlainnng the goTe )�tnl a,g,ehies"� k ,� Io/gam FREE W E E-W '11"It's the largest one from last year tiue f} e, case'15 'sc eYlu1 d o �6bio�lghF to, its definitely not the largest one ever," court on ;~eb. �S f6r a �atus update. — R- Pencyla said. - City home building incentive ,J LOA continued from page one - - a house in a community, they bring . tax - "If we're not doing something that's revenue and other benefits. out of the box to stimulate residential "To sit there and do nothing, 50 years development and additional rooftops in from now you're gonna be right where our town, many retailers will just check you are today," he said. "Every town is us off the list and not consider us for going to be dropping their permit (fees); N FREE SESSION with a future locationsnd'a she said. this is the long-haul:" p T PER[ON tIL Tp /L ' ILI Cp ' Bill McCue, a homebuilder who lives McCue also noted the other impacts of �{ GIIJJ / 1 1 Rf 1 NER in Bristol , said he supported the program . the lack of home building in the - /`�P J Learn your FITNESS SCORE and find'out`your and would participate in it. - community, such as construction-related s4 fimew level. eet on a workonL plan!(6100 vane) it "The only way you'll bring money to firms going out of business. Hurry; valid for fi st too neNV membe s Yorkville is through rooftops," he said. "This is gonna be great for w , ,e Union,wMU nkrubwha, mm cad Imo„„,„sand,,^;, ,,omm„ McCue said when a person buys a everybody;" he said of the program.. yhmlm•� ^^� •,Ctl ti NN b.aunr�r 'anatanNI ' 7 mm SrvP fM ssLbe ha u 171 'EM R E - W D e • _°' LOYALTY HAS ITS REWARDS w CERTIFIED YOUR UPTO 51,00D IN OWNER LOYALTY C kSnf WITH MOST OTHER OFFERS ! CHEVROLET C31:lICK GMC N,. $ 250 To 0 0 APR OWNER + FOR 72 z LOYALTY " r MONTHS ® IA S H ' ON SELECT MODELS IT0MRM002 WINDSTAR LX $4988 . + 2006 CHRYSLER PT CRUISER $6,988 NEW 2011 GMC NEW 2011 GMC AUTO, A"#4087-___.........-...._.......--.........._............. _-.- e 20i�6 CHRRIYSL LTERRR TOWN &COUNTRY SIERRA SIERRA EXT CAB _ $99ss REG CAB W/T WD SLE Z-71 , 2008 CHEVY COBALT $9,988 I Auto. Air,Trailering Suspensioni #387 LIST: 522,715 PowerTech Package,VIII LIST: a36,310 AUTO, AIR, CERTIFIED #4025.- ._....- ..-_- 111 111 2004 CADILLAC CTS LUXURY $l8 088 $29 2 3 AU , MR. 5UNR00F#4049....................._._-..-_--..._-$11,288 r $2q,2 ;;" , 2006 GMC 1500 CREW CAB 4x4 SLE M0 SEE 114095..-._.-.._.--.._.--__-.--_-_..--._L _. SLIS VMH FULL SHOWCPRLOE WIC4AB. 4x4 $15,988 •zX;l '.f " I TOTAL VAWEFOR 2011 SIERRA WITH 2007 SATURN OUTLOOK AWO $16388 ' ,':. .• " . . '�� "" " POWERTECH .nuro, aR, cERRHm #a9as............... __. , � #' I I •, �00 WORK FORD F350 SUPER DUTY X.. WORK $16,8$8 r r TRUCK;4X4, DIESEL#a092_..--._.. 4.. - . ...,w 2007 GMC YUKON SIT 4X4 NEW2012 GMC , LOADED!#39aR_.- _..-_--.._-----------------_ _ .$19,988 ; ACA DIA Wth w, NEW 2011 GMC 2008 GMC ACADIA SIT FWD $23 988 sLE zsMPDHw lei TERRAIN 2000 HONDA ODYSSEY TOURING Rlue[ootM1 Rear Camel. .' o Remote start! *29 $2ne8w BluetL35,890 SLE2 32MPGXwY SUNROOF. REAR.ENr SYBTEM, NAVI184094- ._. . 4 HOME OF THE SMALL Buemoth, RearComeal 2008 CHEVY TRAVERSE IT $$2,212 . + TIMID SALESMAN! ° ' 2] AWD:LE4111ER, SUNROOF, NAVI! #6075 _....-........._... . $2.5,488 `; LIST: 627,110 2008 BUICK ENCLAVE CXL AWO pQ ' • • 1 . • ' . • 1 ' ' , • , �� $25,L109 . NAVY, REAR ENTERTAINMENT, CERTIFIED! .........$27,288':. 2 006 CHEVY AVALANCHE LIZ O #4W6 $29 288 CREW CAB. LEATHER! _._.___.-.-.- .-.-_ -.-._.... B WE ARE AN AUTHORIZED." UTHORIZER < -, wlxeullNE WESTERN earl m sI r I NEAIIY DUiY Ate hw ,;M punderstand!der for W Joined; room got Ne ment Ngey 0 PeoRla We a SNOW PLOW:& '� DIESEL g 5 °R a"' (630) 892-7093 Me4l6a BI n7 _ „,t., SPJIEADER AEi1I FRI , ., DENALISi Rrst nnu Bn z - .... " " CALLTODAY... WE CAN HELP[ G✓ PJ ,an a. °Z .a, - -�YS z�l Pb4rca2 Pf IuESemonb4 ,•�t7� 4YC .:;:: "-•:.. - - --- - - .�• ;:.. pp OUte : i`Y�149`West Lake'StreeU „ i� • 30 9 = 09:3 ' , � or s'pp � SALE5�f0 - RS. •.. �. � t . .� �ww<wccoffmantrucksgm.com r ,� - tWltt4>r _ Pricesencludst Ktitle,and license lee.Aebales applied.$To qualire d buyers mm approved credit You must lade-ina 1999 or rawar ehicle(Saab¢uluded)and purchase a new GMC pickup to gwllrylar$lGOOTredeAssiss6'n¢s. Seectlealkfordemils40 qualified buyers wlN Sppmi2Urretlll 'OY< APAfnancingzvaPaN�dn' efsdl fmodefsin lieu of rebalestoqual Fred buyers;0%for72413.89 permo. per MW Inanced;0% for 6046.67permo. per$1,000Iinanced. Pictures are for illusma ion purposesonlyandmaynolr elleclac[mI vehicle. Dealerwill no thonorpricinganNorincenliueenors in his ad.See dealer for de ails. Manutaclurers incentives are foralimiledfimeand su6i�llo rtang¢. 7 mrsdav, May 3, 2012 RECARD 15 Our readers opinions Forum BUILD, Path are good news... Daddy Daughter Dance thanks... Lions Club blood drive... With SIT 0¢ doom and gloom uncles that se tope Yorkville Grade School Daddy unnemer Dane Ile swsmd 2012 Yorkville Lions Club blood live find mein nay into me newspaper here in YurkemelI Commhme . onto like it, brink par paranoia Dill be held It me Beecher Community form, on houghlsome proban racusimpup ... wi he 's harpoons and ' n 'J Lf hIpg make 1111,y ry CAmw Dow Road feu tor ] do, ThpiCam'. May miler. Sunni[ Effort hand d have Men hoppe - stares[ III her Am WOOS mile ooze 10, sand land painting the Yorkville Brad program 0110 donnlionsryv 'Down to the February Jones and the Record the path far We Nth. IOnak you an Yorkville Car Wash. not I body'I, edlmrad awtl rvho challenged the normally. our the Yorkville BUILD pmgmm n mhh seme Olive (Gram. Famous Drs,. Cap.. Diamond,d, nimary dmc rvus Nn. best In in. evil years. We skepticism area Oren proposed at of the P.coeamoi DEC, Jenny Mike's Sub Shop, 1K,. Neely Weds implanted Is units of blood rvhon Hmnland'I goal was Do,distant Common" hilt the maynrunit same of us Forts, Isgends Sports Bar, Smukey's. Wrigley, 28 mg. We huge that this is a troll trend antl even im tine ('Try Council believed x I wedded to sn"non. ( poison. singles 1312,11(1 l'nradie Gar bona donors up come on May 10. wriouthing entrant: W IJ 'R N h, Plain Molding ( ., 0" D I I t, R 13 e god I J J d'.Sky broadly vial hope ' d pm) hu s mch " w mlc Rol M DO aria Gold Seen Academy f Drive, c§oy llej " and lomem.de cork s.lake would M1npoen, ITC patty numbs rr onuJ [he Ana Zone, lmbrood Me, A tendril You Vocipl, and to Labor annual You will hear send Imuenllag BUILT) alumna , omkono 1 009, 2010 Poo V II yT d g C U )'; M B r Fy as to wh) cited g'rva. and 2011 nc had a our of 2 spade ddpdfly building Clh c Portals Pen FUL Haven, Idane Dell . Go. HILL SCHELL p0 -¢ During (lid first four months of IS 12. rye have Valley YMCA. Pony Ci ,. Burrnla said Wings, Yorkville Lions Club MJ ID .anglo Nell) points and 12 BUILD program Walik Village Grind Tor, Four, 1A 'fm. dinosaur 1122 in untmhs compared to 22 In lone yfine_ Spam Bar. Gems Prior 01,, Gantry. Iakcnlen We need more of this mr and thinking to continuo the Grill Kendall Pub. Verve. Nails. Belle t'mssa. motherland Suer IJ; Rionimmm.Gala Clp: F resonant Soon,.Are < md brief treat fu I. Ibe Poll far me Nth Hundred, ad Anytime F IfFoo, l far them lawn been 51Power of one pledged 4 special thanks goes I, drivers rT k Idle For �\ out of in, ,,at d Had id July s 2012 times is 120000 providing r d In d hose in M1 bankari hJ Lf ptymemb he<W M We otand diss, like hank YLrivlie ,nv of $18927 is doe among fiscal year 2012-2113 io the Middle School for the use of their facility. ^r°M ra °its alley is In the bank before the S'Nal year Ivan bcaerw. And a IS- [bank you pa everyone rvho attended TM1h e OkLN r �gainvome of themunolltwku l©po!(w[h lea graSS fm event, All prw'cuds to directly hack b Yorkville maY�rh-n(nT N> iry effort and so for is mutual like they Oman Sc'hml l'd amilmtmf District 115, will live farrowing to their promise. I think it Is gat that a YGS DADDY DAUGHTER DANCE Kenny Durland Ideal community gaup stuck their neck out and is COMMITTEE doing somommi skive for our city. Yorkville Prnhivc attitudes will do the United City Of Yorkville Re Bon D Yorkville, IT 60560 more goad than negative and nionernrauituJes Radio 63P553 5353 is a problem ge's look for creative nabs to sake the problem and n"just Say no and Omn our hands u MARTY NA wert] 3 alderman Vorl g1e M.Now UnitedHealthcare members have more choices... lill st Y 1 Bringing you all the news`ofKendall County Since 9864 Wrestlers i i Sports Church• - youth, use puppets to • e , 1 ..see Countywide . • . • • • .a.'�. «,iP o ea§"c -'��g`,�� ".®'_ '� . TT x a � ": c \ � ',hr' s. ;" • �` �. 4,yt i, ,, 'wa °�3" ._a '+ .' n ' ° ,� �`' .,,\- y..- s. ,cs }'l°"* 'S �'r r '0�m' � xw. • � �'� �.� V � w.��°as��a- "�"�' �' W 1 a T' �-e•-..�-°,��cx �+"�. .t9� `�. >y a ��i[a :•-i � aka ".L *R` 1V.-. 7. re[�'�i'p � �'nC. Vl'' „g,9 °� YU"•6` �' �.,, y �i tFr ��eyf"' 5,��; a� • • +Y `'$i sLv • � I `�".t}� � `�*d:h'��-" "' 4 r•9 ,�4ey _•�•+- � «ew iy.� ��, ' 1' `'C,r, �'L `' �SaaS �' ` , `^ '�,,,.e•.,,;,8�"` "w ' -c.' �b° '.. OF It �'`..w� v yY' `•ir" ` r ^'. • • e • �_ �- -� vg "�'" 41 �'i� A_ Ld hr� l.-"" P+ r`; Y ' ' IM _ I - - I • 4 ' ~`�\i\ tip- ..+. � � S p }. yy z 4C .c �` IYF ` ti � +J TICS E �..a / lr ,r . "V t.aQ_• F .` J f • "F\wpYmya c 9 •1 • • • I - 1 - I -• 1 ''�..-. y� t > t -I'.Lw a"QGk O Vey. ' 4 • 1 1 1 I t 4 ry �` E� j ja ,q •' 1�` c� �_ C`'Yr-mow.,$"�.' '^ dam P. T rt • " - 1 • • "V _ �V : _ — � e� _ � Ste. C - • • - • I - I • _ _ Io • I I 1 I . • W .-e...,,, ^ .. ,. ..e" " . . I • — vr� v � _ _ e e I • 11 I e • 1 • • I I ' a I ' - • I - - e • I . 1 �, r. r y _ _ It kk I • I . 1 , I 1 e - 1 . •1 . . • I F!- '". - '�"? xM1 . �"- ��"mod+ �`Ms�S � � �. T.W—�+.�' °�•'�� . ��. . • 1 • . - • I ' 1-� � ti kY e+ m' ,,�. ,a„ - �i `"�'L"�JJ� �'? .-.,ate ,j-r �r"rr✓ t N+.' ..� �"' y,yam.! `Y Y�"'r- '°'•-N erv'1aMr.d��M h �r`'SL: �. . • • I 4✓ k .t V i� r" ti H �;"" e.�..:s x��, ".. . "..mac ,euvskxde �-. �-�-�4'�'•`s'�< . . e I • 111 - x ,.� ,+a : r`T ,� .� si"'sJ �, w--.w-.-,z�';.'u.,x a .r�,., �.+.�.. M -...,- ...�-�, 1 1 • • I 1 e • I • 111 �'.' '� �" r�rX�-^1Y "'....n ,>+..,�fi -.+-�",7 ^' +'^ `v-'- r,+& r5r '� Cs4;�' • 1 - I I • I - e . - avb tky��T.'� ! It - A 4K " • 11 • - - e r • • fY`.tl�'N "Y�'. 'y"" +� sT'+'"Y,;r .+*« �.."e ttrr" ,,'�[�� 1"—"�F �-R.�... ��"'--^.` x i �-� � a�,m•aJ . . • I � I r KWv „x.•se �yw�* t•L � � � RAAe�,, rva`+ 5;-lad ew , va;��e >t t.,.Y � �'�^ ` '�a•""+�w'� z: A-m-M....'�"r�?`e �. �� 1 1 " I • e . 1 r r?o-vG� JYw 4 3grv•�m ~,f » e 1 • I _ Ie • _ • . e I 1 - 1 I I - . • I I e • • I I . 1 • I e 1 - • e • 1 • I 1 - e1 - I • 1 . I - 1 , a 1 • I • ' I • • I e - e ' I • e • I - I • e - I • 1e e I 1 I • • • e _ . • • • . e e I • e a • e • e . I _ _ • 6 Kendall Cbuntp RECORD Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013 Police news Facin several charges Ticketed after Identity theft Hunting stands, g G ` r2 crash at Rt 34, 47 A mural Xorkville resident called ,�,� �l�++ She rural : .Y after <learnmgl camera, stolen 9, In �1 2`Ll� ,1 e Ji e Fi that in unauthorized account was' Someone stole two game cameras and,i Daniel _ Cosma 3�,,,gt rctti} e t .7 Yorkville P Sw charged rue. lar F: opened in his name withoutpermission. two tree hunting stands,valued at a total, y Kegqt(a1l iZriYe��GQrkgi ly vYas charged Preston.SO„ of S.watisogAvenue, Plano, of $600,from property on Bell Road in rih wittil;�cnmmgl` tppg1ass, to .irpst¢ence with; driving, ,while„ her license was rural jMinooka. Shenffs Police aze,<<, Grim at ,-da}r;age ;19dpil erty, asspult,, ,., suspended Monday; -morning after her s investigating the theft in southern ,; and disorderly conduct Sunday car hit the back of another vehicle at NeVI!ark damage- Kendall : connty, which was reported afternoon after Yorkville Police were Route 34 and Route. 47. Preston was two da s In a rOW' Sunday. home on .Nader Court in also ticketed for failure, to.,reduce speed y called . to a A resident of East Ta loi Street in Yorkville because of a report of a to avoid an accident and operating an: domestic disturbance. uninsured vehicle., There were no Newark called: Sheriffs Police Friday: Arrest On Van Emmon injuries in the crash, according to police and Saturday to report damage at his Ethan C. Harbin, 22, of Spring Street, reports. home: On Friday, damage to an exterior . Yorkville, was charged with possession Injured In Rt. 52 Crash light post was estimated at $80. The of drug paraphernalia Jan. 17 Yorkville On Jan. 9, Jonathan Clever was Check stolen following day he called police to report $. p p inured in a single vehicle accident on an exterior light fixture rapped from its . at Woodland Drive r o equipment u)nment OBrien Road just south of Route 52. A rural Yorkville woman, called q p heriffs Police Saturday to' report that base and thrown a ditch.Damage in - violation and located. an item of drug Clever was traveling south on O'Brien O B one of her , business checks was that case was also estimated at $80, paraphernalia. when his truck veered off the road hitting a bridge support and endorsed and used t a former business overturning. Sheriffs Police said he was partner- Police said that payment the d check Tailgate stolen transported to the hospital. was Presented for payment' it did not FreenlOnt damage clear the bank. on Caton Farm Rd. Damage was estimated at $150 Someone stole a truck tailgate while Sunday when the driver's side window ,_ , n _ the vehicle was parked , in the 9400 of a car ,parked in the 600 block of jf block of Caton Farm Road in Kendall Freemont Street in Yorkville was found Township south of Yorkville. The broken. Yorkville Police are owner ,called ' Sheriffs Police Saturday investi gating to say. that the tailgate was taken sometime Jan. 16 or 17 while the truck ;ate was parked therefor sale. The missing License Violations «� tailgate was valued at $350. Josef M. Engel, 27, of Route 47, ' g Newark, was charged with driving while his license was suspended Friday + Pills Stolen at work morning after Sheriffs Police stopped _ Twenty-eight Hydrocodene his car at Route 47 and . Helmar Road Acetaminophen pills were reported because it had no front registration stolen Jan. 16 from a business in the plate. 9700 block of Route 126, Yorkville. Sheriffs Police charged Christopher Sheriffs Police said an employee J. Sebastion, 20, of Bowditch Avenue, reported the. pills were taken from his Aurora, with driving without a valid lunch box. ' driver's license after an accident about 4:45 a.m. at Route 71 an d Newark Damage on Bertram Road g Brandon J. Rodriguez, 23 , of The passenger side mirror of a Edgelawn Drive, Aurora, was charged vehicle parked in the 100 block of with driving without a valid driver's < Thanks in part to the city's BUILD incentive program "homebuilding increased Bertram Drive, Yorkville; was damaged ` license Friday morning after Yorkvile for the first-time in several. years in 2012:, City officialssay ifs�(ist the start of Friday. Yorkville Police reports. said Police stooped his car at Route 34 and an'upward trend- (Record Photaby Ehco Miller) damage was estimated at$350. 1 Beecher Road. Yorkville Police charged Ryan T. Deane, Independence Boulevard, Building of new homes up Yorkvillele,, with h driving while his license. was suspended after stopping his car at F +� MJason A. Gale, , of. St. James by 60 1pe{!rcent g 'ri'n. e, Jason Jason A. Gale, 36, of St. James LJ y 1J, l Parkway, Sugar Grove; was charged. w •. ,,with driving while his license was Cher e have been incentives for suspended Jan. 17. Yorkville Police ^fioniopagone . _ " p commercial building, including the TIF Cinema stopped his car on Route 47 north of stopped Boulevard and also ticketed some'?of the recovery I, think 2013 is districts attd pusiness districts in the city. r x . wJen ou' . going to see.u� limWigg oyt `,We've b( iii pretty 'steady," she said.m.him for having no insurance. . 2 ° • • , i of 'i1. 2014r when you see us begin to I "New buildouts, you'll see that this year (815)786-1999 All Theaters Feafu�STal Seating• • - - peak again, and 2015-2016 is when with the new theater and with the Dairy andaitalSdund you'll see the full recovery. That's how I Queen, as well as (stores) in Kendall Children, Senims$G.00•Adult Mel $7.00 see it. We're still keeping our budget set Marketplace, and you'll have new Students Win $7.00 •AduR$8.00 .30MOliies$2More at the 35, 36:-buildmg,perrrutlevel, just to tenants in the Heartland property as be conservativeao wemeet our goals. well:' rmesinaarenmessOWayFridavmm+surdayOnN The number of commercial building Barksdale-Noble said the residential Times F°�bwcd byAslerd¢' Piay Faeayasawrdayony _ - permits wbich :are _ - ' mostly for building impacted commercial building businesses filling in vacancies in in the city. Sh wfines listed for F6insdhursif3l shopping centers, but include any other F "The trend is, more rooftops, more + Gangster Squad (R) business-re)ated ,permits -stayed steady ecommercial " she said. "So, with the 20 7:05,9:30* x 1 at 111 last year, compared to 129 the BUILD program, it has now triggered (2:20) year before `arid 119` in`2010. ' She said` more-eoirimercial:' + Zero IDarkThlrty(R) Route 3o off (.12:45) 4:10,7:25 Q1 EATER$ 10ri - '•' g UA + Hansel & Greteh Witch r Hunters 3D (R) 12:20,2: 15 4:20, 7: 15, 9:15* SHOWIIMESI(G5 - V37 ©NOp„ms ( ) TIRES AND TIMESSUNJEET TO CHANGE + Last Stand (R) / 1 / 1. (12:05,2:25). 4:40,7: 10, 9:35* (12: 10;2:30) 4:50,7:20, 940 ¢UNERSR) .RErEUwncR + Mama (t•G13) ”'` 12 TO"�35519 20 FRIISAT LS ti 30 © NANSELsB,,GNErEL• WITCH ' s (12: 15, 2:20) 4:30,7:30, 94512 HOMERS 7}230700 h FRUSAT S 7205 Actually, rt can be quite comfortable. Thats because were not only + Parental Guidartic G) 0 PARM (R) n 00 4 35;n:75 6:5°, 9:25 FRUSAT LS ,2.00 -"exceptional dentists but we've spentyears perfectingtechniques that (12:00)4:40 - . p MOVIE (R) 1f'S0 2,uo 420. 7:30, 9:45 FRVSAT L512:1§ make even the most nervous_patients feel relaxed and at ease. Our + Parker 0"0°"9 o(P asAT�s',Z;o" 500' gentle touch will help make sure thel only thing you feel is at home. 12:40 4:00; 7:00, 9:20* , OTHE LAST STAND (R T:os. 92s - ( ) 0 BR LININGS PLAYBOOx (R) 11:00. 1'40,-420: 7:00, 9;40. o xxoxex cm uR> 0 Z O BARK5 725. 9:55 - . ShowsSt6rfing Before 3qn DO NOtPoayMmThUrs © 102.50ARRTHIHTT (R) Stews ShrtngARerapm Do NOtPo Sur�Thus '1110 2:50 .6 U 10.00 Group FRI-SUN,TUEOA011: FRI-SUN,TUE, TH 17:45, 220, 4:55, 7:30 ll Compassionate Dentistry Shnwtimes subject to change MON 11:45, 2:20. 10:05 11:45. 10:05 420 E Church Street Sandwich, IL 60548 John S. Waters, D.D.S. For more info and links www.wow7.com A HAUNTER HOUSE (R) 12:00, 220. a:50, 7:15, 9a0 FRI Lsn:as 815-786-2146 - AdamR. Winckler, D.D.S. or call (815)786-1999 or (630)552-8888 PABENrAL GUIDANCE ii 1120, 2:05, 4A0 DATE : 03/04/2013 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE : 1 TIME : OB : 19 : 51 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT IT PT420000 .WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 03/0412013 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE : SIP PERMIT 0 APPLI£0 FEE IMPROV- TYPE STATUS DATE LOCATION TYPE CODE VALUE CONTRACTOR NEXT OF USE PERMIT FEE 20120018 02/13/2012 318 BERTRAM DR HIP 1E 00 SUITE HOMES NEW RES 16, 997 . 80 C OWNER: TRITE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : ERB RB LOT : 1039 20120028 02/17/2012 2279 LAV2ND2R WAY 1 26, 851 . 00 PULTE HOMES NEW AES 13, 376 . 49 C OWNER: -=E HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB ! AC LOT : 71 20120030 02/93/2012 1979 MEADOWLARK IN SIP *** 2]5, 000 . 00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 20, 120 . 00 C OWN-k: I: CUE BUILDERS PO BOX 354 BRIBTOL, IL 60512 SUB: CNT LOT: 118 20120036 03/01/2012 1292 OEERPATH OR SIP " 180, 000 . 00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 14, 032 .20 2 OWNER: HC LAND PARTNERS 6125 REDGATE IN YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB: HLC LOT: 227 201200]] 03/27/2012 2557 EMERALD IN 8IP *'* 1"15, 372 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 778 . 69 T OWNER: SUITE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT : 128 20120083 03/6 :'i /2012 1554 CRIMSON IN SIP *** 161, 636 . 00 SUITE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 697 . B9 C OWNER: PF'.C=, HOMES 1901 N HOBBLE SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AT LOT : 301 20120100 04/ '9/2012 < - 2 PLYMOUTH AVE RIP ' 111, 928 . 00 PULTE BRISTOL BAY NEW RES 16, 103 . 40 C OWNER: PUCTFI 1901 N ROSELLE RD 3539 W 57 PL, ONTO, IL 60629 SCHAUMBURG, IL 5D195 SUB: IRS LOT : 995 20120101 04/ 02 /2012 2383 LAVENDER WAY 8IP *** 106, 046 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 170 . B9 C OWNER: PULTE 1401 N ROSELLE RD 1623 CANYON RUN, NAPERVILLE, IL SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT : 90 20120113 04/ 12/2012 1145 GRACE OR BID *** 245 , 000 . 00 NICHE BUILDERS NEW RES 13, 956. 20 C DWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS INC PO BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60560 SUB: HLC LOT : 67 20120125 04/ 18/2012 1562 CRIMSON IN BIP "I 175 , 372 . 00 FINITE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 778 . 69 C OWNER: CULTS HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 6D195 BOB: AT LOT : 201 20120126 04/18/2012 1092 CARLY DR BIP *** 318 , 240 . 00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 19, 463 . 78 C OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60512 SUB : BBD LOT : 30 20120165 05/07/2012 1273 TAUS CIR SIP * SED, 000 . 00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 13, 529 . 60 C OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 REDGATE IN YORKVILLE, IL*60560 SUB : HLC LOT : 117 20120183 05/16/2012 827 GREENFIELD TURN BIP "1 270, 000 . 00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 20, 321 . 80 C OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS/-,ARY FRANCIS PD BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60512 SUB : CUT LOT : 51 20120184 05/17 /2012 244 EMERALD IN BIP '** 160, 530 . 00 SUITE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 778 . 69 C OWNER: SUITE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 114 20120185 05/17/2012 1494 CRI_V N LN SIP 136, 570 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 527 . 49 C OWNER: SUITS HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT: 901 20120205 D5/2912012 1192 KATE DR BTP *' 220, 000 . 00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 13 , 933 . 80 C OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 REDGATE IN YORKVILLE, IL*6056D SUB : PLC LOT : 236 Il DATE : 03/04/2013 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE : 2 TIME : 08 : 19 : 51 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID : PT420000 .WDW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 03/04/2013 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: BIP PERMIT APPLIED FEE IMPROV- TYPE STATUS DATE LOCATION TYPE CODE VALUE CONTRACTOR MEND OF USE PERMIT FEE _______ ___--___ 2DL20217 09/20/2012 12B2 ^i,E AR6>^33 DR BIP *xx 25D, 000 . 00 RICHARD MARKER 4 ASSOC . NEW RES L3, 547 . 60 C OWNER: RICHARD MARKE£ ASSOC 654 E.EARTLAND OR YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB : HLC LOT : 250 20120218 06/04/2012 1377 SPRING ST SIR +++ 269, 565 . 00 MOTOR BUILDERS NEW RES 14, 012 . 40 C OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO 354 BRISTOL, IL 60512 SOB : HLC LOT : 254 20120244 06/18/2012 1519 CRIMSON IN BID *+* 170, 850 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 652 . 09 C OWNER: PULTE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAOMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 1601 20120245 06/18/2012 1546 CRIMSON IN BIP *+* 132, 666 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 327 . 49 0 OWNER: PULTE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOU : 401 20120275 06/26/2012 2420 SAGE CT BIP ++ 153, 578 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 450 . 49 C OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHADMBQRG, IL 60195 SOB : AC LOT: 3101 20120276 06/26/2012 1530 CRIMSON IN BIP 151, 810 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 439 . 69 C OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBQRG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT: 601 20120277 06/26/2012 1511 CRIMSON IN BIP *** 175, 372 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 578 . 69 C OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT: 1501 20120278 06126/2D12 4620 PLYMOUTH AVE BIP '** 126, 922 . OD PULTE BRISTOL BAY NEW RES 13, 293 . 69 E OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : ERB LOT: 994 20120413 08 /29/2D12 1201 KATE OR BIP ** 180, 000 . 00 TIM GREYER BUILDERS NEW RES 13, 529 . 00 C OWNE3 TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 RED GATE IN YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB: HLC LDT : 244 20120482 09/06/2D12 2384 TITUS DR BIP 107, 780 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 381 . 09 T OWNEn PI-PE 3R0=P 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCEAQMRURG, IL 60195 SUB: AO LOT: 246 201204c3 '.9,10611 .2 2394 TITUS DR BIP ** 86, 502 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 067 . 69 I OWNER: P'J TD CB077 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 090 : AC LOT: 248 20120477 09/13/20:2 2388 TITUS OR �I "1 58 , 786. 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 092 . 89 C T OWNER: PULTE G-,OP 5. 901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 247 20120552 10/04/202 1513 CRIMSON LN BIP 140 , 998 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW ASK 13 , 576 . 49 I OWNER: PULTE HCP:ES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 1901 201205 - 9 10/18/20:% 2393 TITUS DR HIP *** 107 , 780 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, BG6 . 09 T OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD STE 1000 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AN LOT : 250 20120520 10/18/2012 2345 TITUS DR DIP **+ 103, 292 . 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 354 . 69 T OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD STE 1000 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 255 20120521 10/18/2012 2353 TITUS OR BIP * 08 , 502 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 752 . 69 T OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 254 DATE : 03/04/2013 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE : 3 TIME: 08019 : 51 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID : PT420000 .WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 03/D4/2013 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: BIP PERMIT # APPLIED FEE IMPROV- TYPE STATUS DATE LOCATION TYPE CODE VALUE CONTRACTOR MENT OF USE PERMIT FEE ------------- - ---------------------------------------- _____--_-----------1 RE_______--------------______---------____ 20120522 10/18/2012 462 OMAHA DR BIP * 280, 000 . 00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW S 13, 721. 60 T OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 REDGATE IN YORRVILLE, IL*60560 SUB: HLC LOT : 82 20120546 11/01/2012 1322 DEERPATH DR BIP *** 240, 000 . 00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 13, 506. 20 1 OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60512 SUB: HLC LOT:. 224 20120559 11/13/2012 2368 TITUS DR BI 143, 1]4 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 639 . 29 T OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD 41000 P SCHAUMHURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT: 243 20120560 11/13/2012 1491 CRIMSON LN P *** 151, 810 . 00 PULTE HOMES CORE NEW RES 13, 440 . 09 I OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD =NMI SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AT LOT : 1401 20120566 11/15/2012 2374 TITUS DR BIP ** . 99, 926. 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 334 . 89 T OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD STE 1000 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 244 20120589 12/19/2012 2339 TITUS DR P x** 143, 174 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 389 . 29 I OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD =kSCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 256 20120590 12/1912012 2325 TITUS DR P *x* 123, 012 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW ME 13 , 270 . 69 I OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD E=kSCHAUMBURG, IL 6019.5 SUB : AC LOT : 257 20130009 01/14/2013 2348 TITUS OR BIP 123, 012 . 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 375 . 69 I OWNER: THE PULSE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AT LOT: 239 20130010 01/14/2013 2545 EMERALD IN His *** 132, 668 . 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 432 . 49 I OFFER: THE PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AS LOT : 126 20130023 02/05/2013 2256 LAVENDER WAY P *** 132 , 668 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 432. 49 I OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT: 60 20130024 02/0512013 2399 AUTUMN CREEK BLVD BIP *x* 1] 5 , 3]2 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 683 . 69 I OWNER: THE PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD - SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT : 266 20130025 02/05/2013 2344 TITUS DR * 104, 312 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,265 . 69 I OWNER: THE PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 230 20130031 0.2/05/2013 2364 TITUS DR P *** 99, 926. 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 239. 89 I OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD =EmiSCHWUMBURG, 11, 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 242 20130032 02/0512013 2305 TITUS DR * 124, 134 . 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 382 , 29 I OWNER: THE PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD ELGIN, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 259 ` 20130039 02107/2013 1162 CODY CT RIP ** 265, 000 . 00 WINNINGER EXCAVATING, INC. NEW RES 19, 518 . 18 A OWNER: JIM & RYAN BOWEN 746 JOHN ST YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB: BBW LOT: B 20130040 02/08/2013 1102 CARLY DR BIP **x 275, 000 . 00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 19, 906 . 18 I OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60512 SUB : BBW LOT: 28 DATE: 03/04/2013 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 08:19:51 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID: PT420000.WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 03/04/2013 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: SIP PERMIT APPLIED FEE IMPROV- TYPE STATUS DATE LOCATION TYPE CODE VALUE CONTRACTOR MENT OF USE PERMIT FEE __________________________________ _-____ _-__--________________-_______________----______________ _______ *** 20130047 02/19/2013 2320 TITUS DR SIP 143,174.00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13,494.29 -A OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 233 20130055 02/27/2013 342 WESTWIND DR SIP *** 180,000.00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 23,302.00 A OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 RED GATE IN YORKVILLE,IL 60560 SUB:. CBW LOT: 7 20130056 02/27/2013 1112 AUBURN DR SIP *** 180,000.00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 13,568.00 A OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 RED GATE IN YORKVILLE,IL 60560 SUB: HLC LOT: 87 20130057 02/27/2013 1459 WOODSAGE AVE SIP *** 160,000.00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 23,226.00 -A OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 RED GATE IN YORKVILLE,IL 60560 SUB: CBW LOT: 20 20130058 02/27/2013 2378 TITUS DR SIP *** 104,312.00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13,265.69 A OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 245. DATE : 03 / 04 / 2013 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE : 5 TIME : 08 : 19 : 51 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID : PT420000 . WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01 / 01 / 2012 TO 03 / 04 /2013 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE : BIP CODE & DESCRIPTION # OF PERMITS CONSTRUCTION VALUE AVERAGE VALUE PERMIT FEES ____ _- __ _____ _ __ _ __ PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY : BIT BUILD INCENTIVE PROGRAM SFD 53 $ 8 , 645 , 086 . 00 $ 163 , 114 . 83 $ 773 , 334 . 80 IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY : NEW NEW 53 $ 8 , 645 , 086 . 00 $ 163 , 114 . 83 $ 773 , 334 . 80 TYPE OF USE SUMMARY : RES RESIDENTIAL 53 $ 8 , 6451086 . 00 $ 163 , 114 . 83 $ 773 , 334 . 80 STATUS SUMMARY : A APPLIED 6 $ 1 , 032 , 486 . 00 $ 172 , 081 . 00 $ 106 , 374 . 16 C CLOSED FILE 22 $ 4 , 186 , 478 . 00 $ 190 , 294 . 45 $ 323 , 743 . 97 I ISSUED 16 $ 2 , 361 , 510 . 00 $ 147 , 594 . 38 $ 221 , 294 . 75 T TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE 9 $ 1 , 064 , 612 . 00 $ 118 , 290 . 22 $ 121 , 921 . 92 SUBDIVISION SUMMARY : AC AUTUMN CREEK 33 $ 4 , 352 , 969 . 00 $ 131 , 908 . 15 $ 444 , 295 . 37 BBW BLACKBERRY WOODS 3 $ 858 , 240 . 00 $ 286 , 080 . 00 $ 58 , 888 . 14 BRB BRISTOL BAY 3 $ 404 , 312 . 00 $ 134 , 770 . 67 $ 45 , 844 . 89 CBW CORNERSTONE BRIARWOO 2 $ 340 , 000 . 00 $ 170 , 000 . 00 $ 46 , 528 . 00 CNT COUNTRY HILLS 2 $ 545 , 000 . 00 $ 272 , 500 . 00 $ 40 , 441 . 80 HIT HEARTLAND CIRCLE 10 $ 2 , 144 , 565 . 00 $ 214 , 456 . 50 $ 137 , 336 . 60 REPORT SUMMARY : 53 $ 81645 , 086 . 00 $ 163 , 114 . 83 $ 773 , 334 . 80 * * * - Multiple Fee Codes Matched B . U . I . L . D . Survey Analysis United City of Yorkville March 4, 2013 How influential was the incentive Do you agree you would have not in your decision to purchase a new moved to Yorkville this year if not home in Yorkville? for the program? 6% 22% 13% ■Extremely Influential 34% Strongly Agree ■Very Influential Somewhat Agree 47 ■Somewhat Influential Somewhat Disagree -Not Influential at All Strongly Disagree 25 47% How easy or complicated was the Which of the following builder contribution program process? options would you have preferred instead of the matching $5,000 in cash? 3% 3% 4% $5,000 in Closing Costs Very Understandable/Easy 23% $5,000 towards a Down Somewhat 23% Payment 34% Understandable/Easy $5,000 in Builder Somewhat Upgrades 60% Confusing/Difficult No Change Very Confusing/Difficult 20% Other 30% How did you hear about the Which Builder? B.U.I.L.D. program incentive? 14 12 3% 10 — 10% •Builder C 8 CL 0 •Friend a 6 — Newspaper 4 •Website •Realtor 2 0 Centex Greyer McCue Pulte Builder Were you looking in other communities to Where did you relocate from? purchase or build a home before choosing 5 Yorkville? 4 a, 3 a 0 a a 2 ■Yes ■No 1 0 a�0 t� etJ\\� r\`ago �aA'e Ga�o\� O�h� How do you plan on spending your Would you recommend this incentive money? program to a friend? 12% 7% Purchase furniture or goods Use towards debt/bills 27% 44% Yes Save or Invest it No Other 93% 17% Additional Comments From Participants "Great program and it was a great perk for moving to Yorkville." "Great incentive in theory but the way the builder handled did not make the BUILD program very beneficial." "Thank you, nice incentive to a New Home Buyer to welcome them to a new area." "Good program -very motivating." "Everyone was wonderful and we will tell everyone." "We had intended to build a house in Gates Creek in Oswego." "It's been a ten year dream to move closer to our children. We are from small town Iowa where everything is less expensive and while our home brought good money there -not so much for buying a home here. The new home was a lifelong dream and so this incentive was of tremendous value to us. Thank you so much." "Good incentive to keep new construction going in tough economic times." Building Permits Issued Per Year 800 753 NSINGLE FAMILY DETACHED OSINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED 700 600 572 -a 500 470 4A E 401 a 400 C 360 3 300 ?R4 Z 200 153 100 68 56 67 42 43 10 22 3 22 18 6 8 6 0 0 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Type of Building Permits Issued Comparison in 2012 Feb-13 M13.U.I.L.D.Single Family Dwelling Permit Jan-13 MRegular Single Family Dwelling Permit Dec-12 Nov-12 Oct-12 Sep-12 Aug-12 Jul-12 Jun-12 May-12 Apr-12 Mar-12 Feb-12 Total Amount between Jan. 2012- Feb. 2013 B.U.I.L.D.Single Family Dwelling Permits-46 Jan-12 Regular Single Family Dwelling Permits-38 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of Permits Issued A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number A 0 40 Legal PW#1 Finance EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ PW 2012-74 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: YBSD-City intergovernmental agreement amendment Meeting and Date: City Council—March 12, 2013 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: D C fT y _ o Memorandum EST ia3s To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: March 7, 2013 NmtlN Cowry Subject: YBSD Intergovernmental Agreement LE Summary Approval of an amendment to the intergovernmental agreement between the City and YBSD, regarding billing procedures. Background This item was last discussed by the Public Works Committee at the December meeting. At that meeting, the Committee endorsed an intergovernmental agreement draft as included in this packet. In brief, the first proposal dictated that YBSD would pay the City 5% of the YBSD billings for the life of the agreement, and that percentage would increase according to inflation. The agreement was sent to YBSD for their review. The YBSD board requested the proposal be amended to limit the agreement to two years, and to set the percentage amount at 5% for each year. The attached agreement is drafted to incorporate YBSD's requests. Recommendation Staff recommends accepting YBSD's requests, and recommends approval of the intergovernmental agreement as presented. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS,APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AND THE YORKVILLE-BRISTOL SANITARY DISTRICT REGARDING BILLING FOR DISTRICT SERVICES Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois This day of March, 2013 Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois on , 2013. Ordinance No. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AND THE YORKVILLE-BRISTOL SANITARY DISTRICT REGARDING BILLING FOR DISTRICT SERVICES WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City previously entered into an Amended Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement (the "Agreement") dated July 11, 2005 with Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the City and the District desire to amend the Agreement to provide for an amended fee from the District for the billing and collection services provided by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That the Amendment to the Amended Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement Between the United City of Yorkville and the Yorkville Bristol-Sanitary District Regarding Billing for District Services, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2013. CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING Ordinance No. 2013- Page 2 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2013. MAYOR Ordinance No. 2013- Page 3 AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AND THE YORKVILLE-BRISTOL SANITARY DISTRICT REGARDING BILLING FOR DISTRICT SERVICES THIS L'7�AMENDMENT is made and entered into this day of DeeembffMarch 2013-2, by and between the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), and the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District (hereinafter"District"). WHEREAS, City and the District are units of local government and public agencies within the meaning of the Illinois Intergovernmental Cooperation Act (5 ILCS 220/1 et seq.) (the "Act") and are authorized by the Act and by Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Constitution of the State of Illinois to enter into intergovernmental agreements of cooperation; and, WHEREAS, the City and District entered into an AMENDED INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT(the "Agreement") dated July 11, 2005 regarding the City providing billing and collection services for the District's services to residents in the District; and, WHEREAS, the City and District desire to amend that Agreement to provide for an amended fee from the District for the billing and collection services provided by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein City and the District agree as follows: 1. The above recitals are incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. 2. That paragraph 1 of the Agreement is deleted. 3. That paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: "3. The City agrees to provide billing and collection services for the Sanitary District. These services shall be a part of the City's bi-monthly utility billing program. The City shall forward the funds received from the billing and 1 collection of the Sanitary District's fees and charges not less than 45 days after its receipt by the City. The City shall be entitled to deduct from the Sanitary District's fees and charges a service fee in the City's fiscal year 2013 and fiscal year 2014 of five percent (5.0%) of the Sanitary District fees and charges collected. City's 4. The eaeh subsequent fiseal year- by the prior- 12 mei#h per-een4 Eenstimer-pr-iee inQex. 3. All other terms contained in the Agreement not amended by this First Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. 4. Any term or condition of this Agreement may be amended, deleted or altered only by written agreement approved by and duly executed by City and the District. 5. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts that shall be an original and shall constitute but one and the same Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective on the day and date first above written. United City of City, an Illinois municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: Date: City Clerk Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District By: President Attest: Date: Secretary 2 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )ss COUNTY OF KENDALL ) AMENDED INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT In accordance with the declaration in Section 10 of Article VII of the Constitution of the State of Illinois and Intergovernmental Cooperative Act, the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (herein after referred to as "City") and YORKVILLE-BRISTOL SANITARY DISTRICT (herein after referred to as "Sanitary District'), the parties, agree as follows: WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City of Yorkville and the Sanitary district are duly organized and authorized governmental bodies existing in Kendall County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the parties had previously entered into Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement for the collection of water and sewer fees and users charges, and to consolidate the issuing of statements and collection of monies; and WHEREAS, each governmental entity desires to continue to enter into a mutual Intergovernmental Cooperative Agreement for the collection of water and sewer fees and users charges, and to consolidate the issuing of statements and collection of monies therefore; and WHEREAS, each party deems it in the best interest of the respective governmental body and for efficient and cost effective collection and billing for said services the parties do now hereby agree as follows: 1 . The Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District will pay the United City of Yorkville a Capital Outlay Fee in the amount Eleven Thousand Nine Hundred Fourteen Dollars ($ 11 ,914.00) as evidenced in the Capital/Annual Cost Analysis attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A". 2. The Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District will pay the United City of Yorkville an amount not less than Thirty Two Thousand Five Hundred Twenty-Seven Dollars and Thirty-Six Cents ($32,527.36), effective May 1 , 2004, per year for services rendered in the billing of statements and collection of all Sanitary District Fees and user charges (herein after referred to an the "annual fee") as evidenced in the Capital/Annual Cost Analysis attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit «A,> 3 . The amount constituting the Annual Fee shall be reviewed at the end of each Fiscal year or upon request and demonstration of need by either ply. 4. The Agreement shall be governed by the Ordinances from time to time enacted, modified, and amended by either the City of the Sanitary District. Nothing contained herein shall give either party a right to modify the termination provisions or the charge of the City to the Sanitary District. 5 . Each parry shall continue to maintain insurance coverage on its separate I governmental property, and hold the other harmless and indemnify each i governmental entity one fiom the other for any claim or liability resulting from the individual acts of the Sanitary District or the City. 6. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as delegating or authorizing the expenditure of any public monies or the delegation of any authority by any governmental entity not permitted by law, it being expressly understood that the expenditures undertaken herein are based on actual cost of services provided respectively by the governmental entities involved. 7. This agreement shall continue unless sooner terminated upon written notice by one governmental entity to the other with at least six months advance notice. IN WITNESS WHREOF, the undersigned governmental bodies have each executed this Agreement this day of L�- 2005. O LLE- RISTOL SANITARY DISTRICT Attest: Date: -141 , LO 5 UNITED CITY OF YORKVIL By: Mayo r. •9r Attest: `a`v>•••......., ... , City C erk ;' m Date: �J�y �. ZoO5 ® ` SEAL UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CAPITAL/ANNUAL COST ANALYSIS PROPOSED YBSD FEE Capital Outlay Sensus Handhelds 15,000.00 Software 8,760.00; Conversion/Training 4,690.00; _ Bar code scanner/receipt printer/cash drawer 1,335.00 Total Cost 29,785.00 One Time YBSD Fee @ 40% 11,914.00 "Does not include capital costs relating to buildout, furniture, phone, computers, files, etc. Annual Operating Expenses @ 25% Meter Reader Expenses @ 50% 1,575 UB + 1,495/2 (third party Software annual service fee 2,322.00 products/year) Meter Readers 7,000.00 Utility Billing Clerk 35,360.00 ISS 535.50 3188 mailings @ .212" Receptionist 24,752.00 Postage- Billings 4,055.006 SS/IMRF 10,651.85 Postage-Late Notices I 414.00 300 @ .23 6 Benefits(health,life,dental) 28,984.00 1 12,004.50 Postcards 241.00 3188 mailings @ .01262 each'6 +Annual inflation/COLA increase @ 3% 360.14 102,310.85i, Total Annual Meter Reader Expenses 12,364.64 +Annual inflation/COLA increase @ 3% 3,069.33 Total Annual Operating Expenses 105,380.17 Total Proposed Fee FY 04105 @ 25% 26,345.04 Total Proposed Fee FY 04/05 @ 50% 6,182.32 TOTAL ANNUAL PROPOSED Yll FEE $32,527.36 Ilk 5 6 -j- Created March 2004 A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 440 Legal ■ PKBD #1 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~� City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ CC 2013-17 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ■ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Riverfront Businesses Contract Extensions Meeting and Date: CC March 12, 2013 Synopsis: The Park Board has approved the contract extensions for River City Roaster, Whitewater Ice Cream and Geneva Kayak. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approve contract extensions as recommended by Park Board. Submitted by: Laura Schraw Parks & Recreation Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Please see the attached memo and documents. Co.® Memorandum EST. _ 1836 To: Yorkville City Council From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator °n NentlaB CoC.unTy =O Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk ALE t Date: March 1, 2013 Subject: Riverfront Businesses Contract Extensions D The Park Board approved contract extensions for an additional two years for the Riverfront Businesses that are located at Bicentennial Riverfront Park for each of the following businesses; River City Roasters (131 E. Hydraulic Unit C), Whitewater Ice Cream(131 E. Hydraulic Unit A&B) and Geneva Kayak(301 E. Hydraulic). The dates for the contract extensions are as follows: River City Roasters: June 23, 2013- June 22, 2015 Whitewater Ice Cream: June 7, 2013- June 6, 2015 Geneva Kayak: May 10, 2013- May 9 2015 Two changes to the original terms of the Geneva Kayak contract have been approved by Park Board; A) reducing the payment to the City from their adjusted gross receipts on instructional programs, rental and guided tours from twenty percent(20%)to fifteen percent (15%), and B) changing the sign on the front of the building to say"Yorkville Outdoor Center". No changes were approved for the River City Roasters and Whitewater Ice Cream contracts. Park Board is requesting that City Council approve the contract extensions for a two year term for River City Roasters, Whitewater Ice Cream and Geneva Kayak as recommended. PKBD #la Resolution No. 2013- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT WITH ERICK GOEPEL DOING BUSINESS AS RIVER CITY ROASTERS (131 East Hydraulic Avenue, Unit C) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City entered into a Concession Lease Agreement with Erick Goepel on June 23, 2011 by Ordinance No. 2011-23 for a concession snack shop at Riverfront Park, 131 East Hydraulic Street in the City; and WHEREAS, Erick Goepel has requested to extend the lease pursuant to the Concession Lease Agreement for a term of two (2) years; and, WHEREAS, the City and Erick Goepel have decided that it is in their mutual interests to exercise the option to renew for an additional two (2) year term beginning at the termination of the existing term on June 22, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That the Lease Extension Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved, and Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation, be and is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the United City of Yorkville. Section 2. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , 2013. CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING Resolution No. 2013- Page I Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , 2013. MAYOR Resolution No. 2013- Page 2 Lease Extension Agreement (131 E. Hydraulic Avenue Unit C) This Lease Extension Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 20_, by and between the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation ("City") and Erich Goepel doing business as River City Roasters, a sole proprietor("Tenant"). Witnesseth: Whereas, the City entered into a Concession Lease Agreement with Tenant on June 23, 2011 by Ordinance No. 2011-23 for a concession operation for the sale of coffee and other beverages and sandwiches and other food (except chewing gum, beer, wine tobacco products and intoxicating liquors) for consumption on and off the premises owned by the City at Riverfront Park, 131 East Hydraulic Avenue Unit C in the City; and Whereas, the First Amendment to the Concession Lease Agreement with Tenant was approved on November 5, 2012 by Ordinance No. 2012-37 to include food and beverages for consumption on-and-off premises and musical instruments, art and other coffee shop related curios and knick knacks; and Whereas, the Concession Lease Agreement provided for an initial term of two (2) years with an option to renew for an additional two (2) terms of two (2) years with terms and conditions as mutually agreeable to the parties; and, Whereas, Tenant has requested to extend the lease pursuant to the Concession Lease Agreement for a term of two (2)years; and, Whereas, the City and Tenant have decided that it is in their mutual interests to exercise the option to renew for an additional two (2) year term beginning at the termination of the existing term on June 22, 2013. Now, therefore, in consideration of the covenants and agreements contained in this Lease Extension Agreement, the City and Tenant agree as follows; 1. The Concession Lease Agreement, for the premise is incorporated by reference and made a part of this Lease Extension Agreement as though set forth in full. 2. Anything contained in the Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the Concession Lease Agreement is amended as follows: A. The term shall be extended for 2 years, commencing June 23, 2013, and expiring June 22 2015, unless terminated sooner. B. Notices shall be given to: United City of Yorkville Erick Goepel 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Attn.: Director of Parks 3. Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the previous Concession Lease Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the term of this Lease Extension Agreement, as originally set forth. In Witness Whereof, the City and Tenant have executed this Lease Extension Agreement on the day and year first written above. CITY United City of Yorkville By: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation TENANT By: Erich Goepel doing business as River City Roasters PKBD #lb Resolution No. 2013- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT WITH ROBYN SUTCLIFF DOING BUSINESS AS WHITEWATER ICE CREAM (131 East Hydraulic Avenue, Units A and B) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, Whereas, the City consented to a sublease of a Concession-Lease Agreement with Robyn Sutcliff as provided in the Assignment of a Concession Lease Agreement For The Sale of Food And Beverages In The United City of Yorkville's Park Building At 131 East Hydraulic Street dated September 26, 2012; and WHEREAS, Robyn Sutcliff has requested to extend the lease pursuant to the Concession Lease Agreement for a term of two (2) years; and, WHEREAS, the City and Robyn Sutcliff have decided that it is in their mutual interests to exercise the option to renew for an additional two (2) year term beginning at the termination of the existing term on June 6, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That the Lease Extension Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved, and Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation, be and is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the United City of Yorkville. Section 2. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of 52013. CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING Resolution No. 2013- Page 1 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , 2013. MAYOR Resolution No. 2013- Page 2 Lease Extension Agreement (131 E. Hydraulic Avenue,Units A and B) This Lease Extension Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 20_, by and between the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation ("City") and Robyn Sutcliff doing business as Whitewater Ice Cream, a sole proprietor("Tenant"). Witnesseth: Whereas, the City entered into a Concession-Lease Agreement with Creative Kernels, Inc. on May 10, 2011 by Ordinance No. 2011-16 for the sale of certain food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises owned by the City at 131 East Hydraulic Avenue in the City; and Whereas, the Concession-Lease Agreement provided for the sublease of the obligations of the Concession-Lease Agreement by Creative Kernels, Inc. with the consent of the City; and, Whereas, Creative Kernels, Inc. entered into a Commercial Sublease Agreement with Tenant dated June 28, 2011; and, Whereas, Creative Kernels, Inc. sought the consent of the City to sublease to Tenant; and, Whereas, the City consented to said sublease as provided in the Assignment of a Concession Lease Agreement For The Sale of Ice Cream and Related Products In The United City of Yorkville's Building At 131 East Hydraulic Street Units A & B dated September 26, 2012; and Whereas, the City consented to the amendment of said sublease agreement to include the Sale of Ice Cream and Related Products, Hot Dogs, Brats, and other Sausage Products, and Beverages with the Exception of Coffee and Coffee Related Products dated October 14, 2012; and Whereas, the City and Tenant have decided that it is in their mutual interests to exercise the option to renew for an additional two (2) year term beginning at the termination of the existing term on June 6, 2013. Now, therefore, in consideration of the covenants and agreements contained in this Lease Extension Agreement, the City and Tenant agree as follows; 1. The Concession-Lease Agreement, Commercial Sublease Agreement and Assignment of a Concession Lease Agreement For The Sale of Ice Cream and Related Products, Hot Dogs, Brats, and other Sausage Products, and Beverages with the Exception of Coffee and Coffee Related Products In The United City of Yorkville's Building At 131 East Hydraulic Avenue Units A &B for the premises are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Lease Extension Agreement as though set forth in full. 2. Anything contained in the Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the Assignment of a Concession Lease Agreement For The Sale of Ice Cream and Related Products, Hot Dogs, Brats, and other Sausage Products, and Beverages with the Exception of Coffee and Coffee Related Products In The United City of Yorkville's Building At 131 East Hydraulic Avenue Units A &B is amended as follows: A. The term shall be extended for 2 years, commencing June 7, 2013, and expiring June 6 2015, unless terminated sooner by the stated provisions. B. All notices to Tenant shall be in writing to: Robyn Sutcliff 3. Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the previous Concession-Lease Agreement, Commercial Sublease Agreement and Assignment of a Concession Lease Agreement For The Sale of Ice Cream and Related Products, Hot Dogs, Brats, and other Sausage Products, and Beverages with the Exception of Coffee and Coffee Related Products In The United City of Yorkville's Building At 131 East Hydraulic Avenue Units A & B shall remain in full force and effect for the term of this Lease Extension Agreement, as originally set forth. In Witness Whereof, the City and Tenant have executed this Lease Extension Agreement on the day and year first written above. CITY United City of Yorkville By: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation TENANT By: Robyn Sutcliff doing business as Whitewater Ice Cream PKBD #lc Resolution No. 2013- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LEASE EXTENSION AGREEMENT WITH SPECIALTY EXPEDITIONS INC. DOING BUSINESS AS GENEVA KAYAK CENTER (301 E. Hydraulic Avenue) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City entered into a Concession Lease Agreement with Specialty Expeditions Inc. on February 22, 2011 by Ordinance No. 2011-06 to operate a canoe and kayak rental center on the premises owned by the City at Riverfront Park, 301 East Hydraulic Street in the City; and WHEREAS, Specialty Expeditions Inc. has requested to extend the lease pursuant to the Concession Lease Agreement for a term of two (2)years; and, WHEREAS, the City and Specialty Expeditions Inc. have decided that it is in their mutual interests to exercise the option to renew for an additional two (2) year term beginning at the termination of the existing term on May 9, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That the Lease Extension Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved, and Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation, be and is hereby authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the United City of Yorkville. Section 2. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and approval as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , 2013. CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING Resolution No. 2013- Page 1 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , 2013. MAYOR Resolution No. 2013- Page 2 Lease Extension Agreement (301 E. Hydraulic Avenue) This Lease Extension Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2013, by and between the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation ("City") and Specialty Expeditions Inc., an Illinois corporation, doing business as Geneva Kayak Center("Tenant"). Witnesseth: Whereas, the City entered into a Concession Lease Agreement with Tenant on February 22, 2011 by Ordinance No. 2011-06 to operate a canoe and kayak rental center on the premises owned by the City at Riverfront Park, 301 East Hydraulic Street in the City; and Whereas, the Concession Lease Agreement was amended by Ordinance No. 2011- 17 on May 10, 2011 by adopting an amended premise map; and, Whereas, the Concession Lease Agreement in section 33.1 provided for an initial term of two (2) years with an option to renew for an additional two (2) terms of two (2) years with terms and conditions as mutually agreeable to the parties; and, Whereas, Tenant has requested to extend the lease pursuant to the Concession Lease Agreement for a term of two (2)years; and, Whereas, the City and Tenant have decided that it is in their mutual interests to exercise the option to renew for an additional two (2) year term beginning at the termination of the existing term on May 9, 2013. Now, therefore, in consideration of the covenants and agreements contained in this Lease Extension Agreement, the City and Tenant agree as follows; 1. The Concession Lease Agreement, as amended, for the premise is incorporated by reference and made a part of this Lease Extension Agreement as though set forth in full. 2. Anything contained in the Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, the Concession Lease Agreement, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows: A. The term shall be extended for 2 years, commencing May 10, 2013, and expiring May 9, 2015, unless terminated sooner. B. Section 31.2 shall be amended to read as follows; 1 "The Lessee, at a minimum, shall make payments equivalent to five percent (5%) of the annual sum of the total adjusted gross receipts on the sale of retail products, and fifteen percent (15%) of the total adjusted gross receipts on instructional programs, rental, and guided tours. Said payment shall be made prior to February I" of each year. The following sales are specifically exempt from the calculation of total adjusted receipts: 31.2.1.1 Institutional sales — large group sales at wholesale prices to organizations that are not subject to sales tax. 31.2.1.2 Adventure travel programs — guided tours and trips to sites outside of a 50 mile area. 31.2.1.3 Sales of used equipment and consignment sales provided the total sales of this group do not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the gross boat sales in any given calendar year. C. The Lessee shall install one sign on the building at a location and size approved by the City stating "Yorkville Outdoor Center." 3. Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the previous Concession Lease Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect for the term of this Lease Extension Agreement, as originally set forth. In Witness Whereof, the City and Tenant have executed this Lease Extension Agreement on the day and year first written above. CITY United City of Yorkville By: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation TENANT Specialty Expeditions Inc. By: Ryan Rushton 2 A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number `u 0 40 Legal ❑ PC #1 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development PC 2012-11 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Kendall Crossing PUD Final Plat Meeting and Date: City Council/March 12, 2013 Synopsis: Request for final plat approval for the Kendall Crossing PUD. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 1/8/2013 Action Taken: Preliminary Plan Approval Item Number: PC 2012-11 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Memorandum O To: City Council J '0 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director EST 1 �- 1836 CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Brad Sanderson, EEI, City Engineer t�l�n Date: March 6, 2013 ,_® Subject: PC 2012-11 —Kendall Crossing PUD—Final Plat "e dae t°unTy <kE �. Request for Final Plat Approval Petitioner's Request& Background: The Petitioner,James G. Ratos (Kendall Crossing LLC), is requesting Final Plat approval for the proposed Kendall Crossing PUD which depicts a seven (7) parcel commercial subdivision, inclusive of a multiplex theater located at the northwest corner of IL Route 47 (Bridge Street) and US Route 34 (Veterans Parkway). As the City Council may recall, the Preliminary Plat for the Kendall Crossing development was unanimously approved with conditions at the January 8,2013 meeting. Since that time, the Petitioner has submitted revised Final Plat and engineering plans to the Plan Commission to address the review comments provided in letters by EEI dated February 8, 2013 and February 13, 2013, respectively, and is now requesting approval from the City Council for the Final Plat of Subdivision. Plan Commission Action: The Plan Commission reviewed the requested Final Plat of Subdivision at a public hearing held on February 13, 2013 and made the following action: Motion to recommend approval to the City Council of a request for Final Plat approval for the Kendall Crossing PUD, as presented by the Petitioner in a plan prepared by RB&Associates Consulting Inc. date stamped received February S, 2013, subject to review comments prepared by the City's Engineering Consultant, EEI, in a letter dated February 8, 2013 as stated in a staff recommendation provided in a memorandum dated February 8, 2013 and further subject to resolution of items#1, #9, #10 and#15 presented in a response letter prepared by Ronald D. Bauer dated February 12, 2013 between the City and the Petitioner. Action Item• Lindblom- aye; Weaver—aye; Prochaska-aye; Jones-aye; Baker-aye; Kraupner-aye 6 ayes; 0 nays Staff Comments &Recommendation The Petitioner has provided revised Final Plat plans prepared by RB & Associates Consulting, Inc. dated March 6, 2013 to address the City Engineer's comments provided in letters dated February 8, 2013 and February 20, 2013. Per the most recent review, and according to the response letter provided by the project engineer dated March 7, 2013, a majority of the items regarding the Final Plat have been addressed. However, there are significant outstanding items related to the final engineering plan which can be reviewed and endorsed by staff subsequent to the Final Plat approval. Although unlikely, this may result in further revisions to the Final Plat. Therefore, it is staffs recommendation that the Final Plat be approved, subject to the City Engineer's review and approval of the final engineering plans. Staff has attached a copy of the memorandum and proposed Final Plat regarding this request for your reference, as well as a draft ordinance. Staff and the petitioner will be present at Tuesday night's meeting to answer any questions of the City Council. RB & Associates Consulting , Inc . Land Surveying, Civil Engineering, GIS/Mapping, Database Management 4 W. Main Street - Suite 201 Plano IL 60545 March 7, 2013 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Re: Kendall Crossing — Final Plat Review Dated 2-20-13 Dear Krysti : Sorry that I did not get the review comments addressed prior to submitting the Plats to your office yesterday. 1. The legal description on Page 4 of the plat has been rewritten as requested. John Whitehouse and I discussed the legal description and how it should be worded at the Surveyors Conference in Springfield in February. I inserted all of the measured bearings and distances into the legal description along with leaving the original deed description so that we would not change the Chain of Title and still address the need for the measured information for mathematical closure. 2. 1 have added to the plat a measured distance to the center line of Route 47 at both the north property line and the south property line. The center line of Route 47 in this area was re-aligned some years ago and does not follow any particular width. Hope this adequately meets your needs. 3. Building setback lines have been shown and we added a Building Setback Table with the necessary setbacks as required by the zoning ordinance. I have increased some of the setbacks to reflect the same width of the easements needed for the utilities since you cannot build within an easement. 4. Last review letter requested the PU&DE to be noted for the easements. Last submittal did not have some of them changed and they have been now. I even added the wording of PU&DE to the usage of Lot 7 for the private street to be subject to the Utility Easements. 5. The legend was updated for the PU&DE designation. 6. The note for the "Record Measured Table" in existing lot 1 has not been removed. That is the only dimension for the easement created years ago allowing McDonald's room to complete some extra grading behind their property. The easement has never been released and still of record therefore I needed to properly designate the limits of the easement. Attorney Dan Kramer is hopeful in getting this easement released at the time of sale of the land for their expansion . If this occurs prior to recording of the Subdivision, I will be more than happy to remove the easement and the table both to McDonalds. 7. 1 have added other easements on the plat for the alignment of the existing gas main and the newly constructed gas main on Lot 1. Other than that, I have easements for all utilities as they will be at the time of completion of this development. Both the gas and the electric have already been relocated. • info(a)rb-associates.net 630.552.7452 BBB.. rb-associates. net us-cemeteries.com 8. The proposed easements for the proposed water main have been widened out to the side closest to the new street. 9. This refers to the same easement for McDonald's included in item 6 of this letter. When I am given the all clear from Attorney Dan Kramer, I will remove the easement. 10. Attorney Kramer will provide the City with the proposed access agreement with the neighboring properties and access to the proposed roads. 11. Once everything is ready for recording, after all signatures by ] DOT and the City, 1 will be more than willing to provide a digital format of the Final Plat to the City on a NAD83, Illinois State Plane, East Zone, US Foot (IL-E). 12. The final engineering has been submitted and at this time, I am not aware of any additional easements or utilities that will be needing easements. Thank you for your assistance in the approval process and if you should have any questions at all, please feel free to contact my office. Yours�ly Ronald D. BauerPLS/Pres Pc. Mr. Bradley Sanderson EEI' Attorney Dan Kramer James Ratos 4 info(g)rb-associates. net 630. 552.7452 ggg . rb-associates. net us-cemeteries.com UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, APPROVING THE KENDALL CROSSING PUD FINAL PLAT Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois This day of March, 2013 Prepared by and Return to: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois on , 2013. Ordinance No. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS, APPROVING THE KENDALL CROSSING PUD FINAL PLAT WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, Kendall Crossing, LLC (the "Petitioner") has filed an application for Final Plat approval of the Kendall Crossing Planned Unit Development for the purpose of resubdividing the approximately 18.5 acres (the "Subject Property") into seven (7) lots numbered, 1 through 7, Lot 1 being improved with a 38,500 square foot structure; and, WHEREAS, after notice by publication and to the property owners within 500 feet of the Subject Property as required by the zoning code of the City, the Plan Commission held a public hearing on the 12th day of December 2012, which hearing was continued to the 13th day of February 2013, to consider the Final Plat of Kendall Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission reviewed said Final Plat and made a recommendation to the Mayor and City Council ("the Corporate Authorities") to approve of the resubdivision and the KENDALL CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAT subject to review comments prepared by the City's Engineering Consultant, EEI, in a letter dated February 8, 2013 and further subject to submittal of the plat to the City in digital format on NAD83 Illinois State Plane, East Zone,US Foot(IL-E). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2. That the Corporate Authorities hereby approve the KENDALL CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAT as depicted on a plan prepared by RB & Associates Consulting Inc. last revised March 6, 2013 attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference subject to staff approval of the final engineering plans. Passed by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2013. CITY CLERK Ordinance No.2013- Page 2 CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of A.D. 2013. MAYOR Ordinance No.2013- Page 3 FINAL PLAT RMAR� � E � V 2 KENDALL CROSSING PUD tS BEINGARESUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOT7 OFTHE RESUBOIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK I OF COUNTRYSIDE CENTER UNIT NO,I 06 2Gla BEING A SUBDMSI0 OFPART OFTHE WESTHALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE ]EAST OFTHE TARO PRINCIPAL MERIDLW IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,NENOALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT m DpL1RT x MULNERN m 0' 5tt tad 150` 7�Fwp`Y16 (-UT 5 LOT 4 Scale: 1"=50' D��l o„ waES. MEASURED BEARINGS ARE BASED ON MEASURED TRUE NORTH I t�I ''” 0 DN00L"1�s A LOT 31 LEGEND: n LOT 32 FOUND IRONPIPE • -A LOT 33 FOUND CROSS IN CANC. = X s1129RONPIPE =0 (� SETBACK TABLE SETCONGSURYEY NOR= 0 FRONT: NONE PDBIIB.'H'EASE. PU.{�F,t PARKWAY SIDE:20' SIDE ADJACENT TO STREET:30' 19.49 REAR: 20' LOT 42 RADIUS M,4FA",RFC. LR947 19.26' LOT 43 covN�R.�g1DE 7143' GH°5.12°2457 W. RADIUS°MFRS�.j1.4'L - }! CH'tAEA -3'46"E.71.43�� \ Q a �Pmn 5\\N` 4pka�4F 6E DA y. Ne N a0l<2 °W4'W]4'F IN+Et Dp""y M1f.gyp NNE N.�. ioNpt'W aC a'°Nm CAUtnNtt�`=' N� ;i�� OQ3�4j9 vG1`4Ly`oNEOS'a `Ob',°' `n�pmc+ Ewssu+� 6 LOT D LOT 1 =7.0586 ACRES LOT 2=1.1507 ACRES r u• ��''E 7AQ. n LOT 3=1.0132 ACRES cN6R`roEes+ts LOT J m� .� �63 E��.j \ y\"'RNNo ZIyo LOT 4=1.8400 ACRES "'.,1ps• s7 '+`4` \`�/G N1�.y4'S6i yOWS,v`�oN��y LOT 5=1.7391 ACRES eN �. 6a z 41.53' gN/ / / n v0 z LOT 6=2.0769 ACRES p4nsysme s RADIUS=25 o0' 41 ,= —� M/�'/ B / \\\ \\ � LOT 7=2.8635 ACRES COMMON DRIVES \ W°"'6"' LOT 4 M�`S'L E.3691 QE ` \ �` s� 1y0PAN`U£oNEO CH.N.2t°44'50' �� TOTAL PROPERTY=17.74166 ACRES F�ro v�\ G°°r U�y\1s`A 695659°E'// G ---;,� cc� \ LOT 3 \ ` P 4f�N•1EQ 6,2 \ EG 14 59+g / �( .\\ �1 soNME 6vs10�1s SPN 200 LOT 3 8401 O`sE Mj%/ O ` 41 -+64 //„ \ // \ NE`,OOON0, EQ q1 RADIUS / 344 - - \ O \ 1.0132 ACRES \ yo1 zDe \ CH.ery 905,1=80�G'S9 79• $Q 1-i4'• �i�^ \ \ N] \ // \ LOT 4 \m /01-0 /6,0 \\s `\ \ \ 1.8400 ACRES \\ \`� LOT 2 \\\ %`\ \ y\ `\ `\ LOT 5 1.1507 ACRES S'y\\` m \C/ \\ \" 4� 1.7391 ACRES iE Ld CS Rcl•S N'i0,s6g5+ \\\/,s�,ssE LOT 6 \\� \\ \\ °\\ -� � ��\ \�\r�� ..\\\\ I 'loN1��aMp9 E 4 63 F RB & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING, INC 4 W MAIN STREET DESIGN FIRM N REVISED FEBRUARY 12,2013 PLANO,IL 60546 184-004475 REVISED MARCH Q 2013 PAGE 1 OF 4 (630)552-]452 www.NFassaGalas.nel DWG#2 01 2-14 31 3-001G FINAL FINAL PLAT KENDALL CROSSING PUD BEING A RESUBOIVISION OF PART OF LOT 7 O THE RESUBOIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK t OF COUNTRYSIDE CENTER UNIT NO. 1 BEING SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28. TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH. RANGE 7 FAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY. ILLINOIS. VA' l \ J �E BP tS'aov/ /so VSs \ d �R 7im`\ / '2 ` \'J6 S0 N °2 2 E =y \ \ \ LOT 4 TP +� RED/N 'o° °E ' too' 150' �i Mm's "�Ji cx' \\ a \\ \ \ 1 .8400 ACRES \` DESE($ \ y LOT 2 p\ Scale: n c r �'i qd \ g \ LOT 5 \ ° \ `\ N °o \ 1.1507 ACRES I rRE i / �t\ o\\ 1.7391 ACRES m° MEASURED BEARINGS ARE BASED � \C \ y ` " N\ ON MEASURED TRUE NORTH 4Ap° 3°PU46E , � %\ \ � Q _ mow/ `\ 'k m \9 _ A- ��_ \ \\ 14 E' 11A183 LL LOT 6 4 < \ 't i- g 2.0769 ACRES \ �n LOT ? . \\ \ !t eaao' \\p \ w ^ ea•araE 4 '�_ y� 0� 1<, iN++MnE. \ \ v°&,— \\ e0M \` g .P HE,2°t0'R ��\ ss'ssmE Po F ?Er N'1NS°Q�/03' '/ ` LRT2I 5 E �'xttl�E ]Y O�sE1AOj se +SP3 xUP LeoE SI Vve LOT 6 ' „ . E pa + LNO A b $U 510 ______ OM 0 O 4V 6zW 19PUSUE e21U9U R G �M 2 °UV A3 R% /. _ S8 �z.�. T'31S E EO 'dng C \\\\ a,s m PES�RJ Ne” ark \ I 3 LO .R49I' R=22fit' $69°3, 55°E Rs28°Utl E Raze. IDS.6r \ \ \ \ I I —_ ---- 19PU6UE \ \\i geJS2+ � � pR. a \ $ ae3T x '� --__ — a� �\\✓ ` \\�,\\ 3646E 4 I9PUBDE N� LEGEND: NP° K�Np +`((((°'\ \\ 6 FOUND IRON PIPE _ • V N ' \ 1 \ \r FOUND CROSS IN CONC. = X SET 1A!- RON PIPE 2 3 - e \ yA mm `\ ` `\ m \\ sI I SETCONGSURVEYMON.= 14=O6 p949 W_ 2147 N� nm \�1 \°m0 Wx\X\\ LOT 1 N\ \ `\ \ \\\\ /IneunoE PUBLIC WILITY E45E PHASE REG S* Ary. — A§ ; \\P7Z AR.` \ \ \ \ \/�\\� I 1 v �5. y I m p o -° 7.0586 ACRES \ \ \ \ \ M G 9 \ \ m ^ ^ \ \ \\\ I I z 3 p0 .31'y\. oom I \ \ m°m2 NNk NE17,6x'2E w o I \\ ; LAI D LOT '? rc g rc I \\`\ `\ °°m�*"' \\\\ /N ' '' -13 15 20 0J5\NE$ /`T' ,n rvATIONAL BANNaFcei(PLB I \ \ +Tp \ �a. � �EA dTa nPSDE '"AMES RATON 9'7s PO CEN C 207 W. KENDALLL MVE \ \ J "'6 1 G YORKVILLE. ILUNOISWU60 \ \ ! y \ \\ I I LOT 1 = 7.0586 ACRES zoneD e-z LOT 2 = 1.1507 ACRES REG. N. 00°43'49"W. 94.00 I mPLUOE LL] LOT 3 = 1 .0132 ACRES MEAS. N. 01°19'54" W. 94.00 \\ \\ '!' `\ LOT 4 = 1 .8400 ACRES j - - - - L - - - +r - �' F- ��i 1 29 REAR SETBACK \-L>�—_ LJ _—__ LOT 5 = 1 .7391 ACRES 150.0' — — — ,6T ( m, \\ \ 6 eJe°E s�OpcK�opU O LOT 6 = 2.0769 ACRES EXIST,unLnr EASV.r+4r REG S. 89° 18' 11° W. 216.95' S fjP� \ '\ n E �p ,'`0.g 151 / LOT 7 = 2.8635 ACRES (COMMON DRIVES) L — — — — — MEAS. 5. 88°39'39° W. 216.95' I �O$ gyp ^ \1�6, s6syotl 3a R 'OZ V1. 1119 I F.0. 1eb g DEED N. a0°56yp -- 9392 --J TOTAL PROPERTY 17.74166 ACRES wr �/ �i MFfs' S.°9 MEAS. 140053416" W / Op°1g'` DEED g M S. N. 85°53'04^ W. P17 F -- DEED N. — — 04°95'00' E. 90.00• _ MEAS. N. 04°08'55' \ I — EXISTI pE _ EgSEAIEMPE0.WC.3016891] I I \ � CS I / R 0015'ly E' 9O'OO' �I �I v Cpl � I FP \L i /R' II MEAS. g OQ°QS'OO" flAU1NE I O ! 1 E �� L POVVA s wz�^B` Troo "iNm/6xfRl4troE4 i0 °06qj° w 14.60' 1 RECORD AND MEASURES TABIE I wl I w AE 6EaSA Mrv�smµ iHs!ZMAN8L RB & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING , INC a o ® 4 W MAIN STREET DESIGN FIRM # REVISED FEBRUARY 12. 2013 PAGE 2 OF 4 P(630)552-7452 5 WWwAbossciates.nel REVISED MARCH 8, 2013 DWG#2012-14318-002 C (FINAL) FINAL PLAT KENDALL CROSSING PUD BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOT 7OF THE RESUBOIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 1 OF OGUNTRYSIOE GENDER UNIT NO. 1 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN THE UNITED CRY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. a ,546'E - ei Ol,w IS'PU60E �\ \ \ 'N6 \\ • ' W Nj3• r , ,5 S i� C'' 'd\ \\ \\ b' I I 5j4°OG'O94gW 2\p13N`G ui �W�' Y\ A\\mm PAC%m�\\ LOT 1 \\ 0' 50' 100' 150' REG. 5.13°2 U!�2` MSS. G� as ui y I \ \\vm mr.L s 7.0586 ACRES \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ I 1 n DR °ae°"s oN I \\ \\$NO m P`\Y I I = d Scale: 1 = 50 �L °�''=''E BA P ti'yv Oa p °P ct` \m SA I » BA J5 �� °TAD o I \\ `TP -A o ` F, k'4 l W 'eto �C3 z I 2CL0 �\\ i ' \y n1 I $ 1053r - D G�' ti i rc I \\ \\ m.6'Ti \\\ ' j>' �'' I 1 w 1.0'1' 2 D: r1 \\ \\ a< FN A AHED 19l nnnorva.BArvrc OF cexue \ \ p � ^�^" N '' ^s^ 1 °W. KENUMLLD \ \ \ e ,' dtVl 1a PUSOE GEN C 20T W. NENOKLDRIVE '' YORKN ZONED LAOIS WSPO DZONED az LEGEND: -C REC. N. 00°43'49" W. 94.00' K I I FOUND IRON PIPE _ • I IIMINI MEAL. N. 01°19'54° VV 94.00' I SET ILT CROSS IN cOluc = x L K PIPE SETCONC. S RVB =G - 2tl REAR SETBACK SET LONG SURVEYMIXL= 0 150.Q _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 ' \\ e�pN0p0g0 PUBLICUOLITYEASE. = BRIEF O EAST.G LTY CASEMENT REC. S. 89° 1611" W. 216.95' pE Wmµ MEASURED BEARINGS ARE BASED — — — — — — --i MEAS. 5. 88°39'39" W. 216.95' I O so \ \� sFgo'n' atl W \eb' —I I °Z02 W. pE LJ. ON MEASURED TRUE NORTH — L — — — — — — — J 1G N o f/ 510 ,232fi ED 14 .35, 9x92 P.O.B. r'0ry0tiA L-, P� \ ` i° 6E0 s.69 MEAS. 140.35' W P.O.B. \ — I ^05' y\. QR t , i� MS'S ,408059116"W. - - - - �r�\$ T— —Y�_ _ DEED N. 04045'00" (, DEEP g ry 90.00' Pu9uc LrtluTrn oRaxABE S. 85v63'04' W. 217 \_-ENST — MEAS. N. 04.08'S5, E. 90.00' LOT 7 IS SUBJECT TO PROVISIONS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS ACCESS EASESINTPEeoOC.MI066n -�I / I �`�\ P4,C'S?' p\ / I REC NG SWbER MAw EAeEMCM M40 ACROSS LOS AFFED AND PUBLIC UTILITYSDRAINAGE EASEMENTS I\I I \J t>`� m \T i �c0 I MEAS S. Oq•g5,VAR LOT 1s� S. OG. PERPE G - PinmaY°L s=n'swro cvrMeRFdI FAL I °G6'q), W. 19.bp• THEI COURT OF ANY LOT FARM THE �MSIM AN ONE SLACCOSCO AN ASSICAS SHAT AS CRANTED A SATURN AND RMPRJXAC CONTEXT FOR BANNER] NO BUREAU OVER MUD ACROSS LOS 7 RECORD AND MEASUREOTABLE I I RECap O0.PEADSQ y LF OFSTNEPES i6 Il n 4.50 I SAALOT L 718 ALSO Iai L-1 =REC. 5.60'56'11° E. 63.0 MEAS, 581°3T00'W. 615V •w'E EWE%NN pµ p Y%LSEROF_I DENTURE FwsE.YIrtPRONLdS SET FARM NEW dE PUBLIC Np L-b FEE. 5. 19.5526'E 6925 MEAS. 520•34'iS E 6925 I '✓'�E9E AYOFap LYP MRS, a co d vFMS NI AIXt SUBJECT TO L-3=REC. N. ]0.0202-E. 125.00' MEAS. N.69'23'13• E. 125Ctl I I Iw OF -4=REQ S. 80°59'1P E. 14.50' BUI S. B1.3]tlPE. 145V �I I I d QOO�(,C` UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE O EASEMENT PROVISIONS cASnEBANrcOF VORxNU.E I al I MEAD.35NVA•W. 01' I G ZI 10'56• 211�. PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT 12t w. urvcOLN Hwv. W 210 J D&KALB, ILLINO1560115 I� A HOLLI CANCER IS WORRY REFORM DRAW NAMED 170 NiAANEATEXR BOOST CPETICN JONAUSSdBaIR ATSRECRLO STOWS A'PF�s ZONED D2 } 5 I A STATE BANK d TRUST OF HANOVER PARIS HOLDERS OF FACTOR FIRMUCHNS WARNED By THE CITY OF FN7RIA ms P0ADI TO CONSTRUCT,T,E4VNN RECD SDUPFXE AMER,RI Vltmd I j (`•y�� %EOIULON ENTERPRISES,LLC � I 1 CASTLEBANKNATRN25M �, I{(� J 44 P.O. BOX 4359 AND TOGETHER SON ME drt lOa6T SSR REFUND FOR TIA OOW'SIANNCOARSEST SURFACE BACK LOTiOSFOR I( 121W. LINCOINMWI. y/ ryy- HOUSTON, TEXAS BZ ]]210 PURPOSES BECOMES APPORTENOT SUCH USES AND DeKPLB, ILLINOIBfi0n5 �p" • `yt� t }5�.._/ o ZONED 62 PAE ZONED 62 A NONEXCUUMVE SAMOANS 15 ALSO TERMS SENATOR) FOR NO WALTER TO THUS AIDS) CTTY OF aOSSI wlAS TO EarsmwT. I�LTFNL THERETO FOR T� INCOREADING AIn THE CRES AREA ON LNE YO AS FdlaaALI WARNER MnwsES uHm, TOLUMFOR mnI A w�R OF ACCESS I p AIVOONALDS COPP. bEKGONA . 3CX HO.PLARLIC urnm a MARINE PasE 19]5 DOWNER PLACE ME EASE GOT RD ElmgES FOR NEWBY wmO ME DAFTS UNION CALCINED FORTHE O ET LINES NOTED S FORM NO THE AURORA. ILLINOIS 80I DOW TO RodnERSAND ssd�u STAR SORT! ME RNLUNLIMa�E FUTURES CWOMMO sTxEx I I � ZONED 62 WHICH FOR CORONA EgMELL L ATW �AeRINOOLDER EE,dN��ADOMLOSTDOPA URMEAU:, ADSTHE LESS RoVTE 4 d AYR m RRR ADS THE OSWARAMON ME LEE OF THE NORRIMMUS OB HEFEARS ,��°OFSk u�`E,�aME� � °A��CBE O'E SUCH MUCH 3 ��ETER LI CASEMENTS AM DOUBLED NO OBSERVER SIAMBER SO AS AT TO NOTHAREAS CUTS CARUSO "M.IT ORERR ANTI WHO ORDORDER ORELSONNEL1TOUI.,,F,•O ! OF nE AIVS PA LOT 1 = 7.0586 ACRES FOROWNG ANY VAN TO N PERFORMED By THE UMMO FFCONi CONNOTE IN THENELSNOF ISE�`H"E�NMUNTSi WORD BOSTON,0uP`uOa O /'IRKWAY) LOT2 = 1 .1507 ACRES BUT NOT FvARES MAT SAD CITY SWLL RE DIAMETER. FOROMM Stu COURTROOM LOT 3 = 1 .0132 ACRES :W��SACI�a� ALT MEAo"� PENDULOUS AN TTO ROAD OTASO RRNNME To SAID PATCH NR' ANRNT OR CONCRETE SURF TO ALL NDM40MOLNOTODOEEMErMMLMUrMSRGIN AGE,ERNLYOEANMrov�oMAwE,KECOMMR LOT 4 = 1 .8400 ACRES oN 60AEg6 LOT 5 = 1 .7391 ACRES 1 xMSA LOT 6 = 2.0769 ACRES ADDITIONAL unuEY EASEMENTS EMSE TS FOR R�RENTO ORGY I I "M,\ED LOT 7 = 2.8635 ACRES (COMMON DRIVES) MEM LOTS AD ALI ONUS ME SANTANA SHOVA OR MIS TOTAL PROPERTY = 17.74166 ACRES RECORDED AS OCTOBER RMs 72��RNOERMECdISTRRCnwa MSDOS ,DO OS s ER WO:v` ICABOsxwS" p8.9 000 GWW jONE6NO" 3 RB & ASSOCIATES O CONSULTING , INC REVISED FEBRUARY 12, 2013 PAGE O OF 4 EEM 4 W MAIN STREET DESIGN FIRM 4 REVISED MARCH 6, 2013 PLANO , IL 60545 184-00 ciat (630) 552-7452 1wlw.rbassociates net DWG 4 2012-14318-003 C (FINAL) FINAL PLAT EGALDESCRIPTION KENDALL CROSSING PUD THAT PART OF LOTI OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK t OF COUNTRYSIDE CENTER UNIT NO. I M THE UNHED CITY OF BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOT T OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 1 OF COUNTRYSIDE CENTER UNIT NO. 1 ORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY. ILLINOIS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER OR1262 BEING BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28. TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE DESCRIBED BY COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT Z;THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 45 MINUTES W 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. SECONDS EAST(MEAS. It W-0855-E)ALONG ME EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7.ALSO BEING ME WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LLINOIS ROUTE NO.47p A DISTANCE OF NO FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE ROOM GO DEGREES AS MINUTES 11 SECONDS MST(MEAS. N.8134'16'W.) PARALLEL WITH ME SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAD LOT T,ADISTANCE OF 140.35 FEET(MFAJL RA5 FEET): THENCE SOUTH ZO DEGREES 02 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST(NORM.69'23'26'W.).ADISTANCE OF ISSAS FEET _ MEAS. ISIBI FEET)TO A POINT OF BEND IN SAID LOT 1:THENCE SOUTH W DEGREES 45 MINUTES CB SECONDS MST RE A5. EA$GMENT P20VISIONS '06'47'W.)ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7.A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET;THENCE NORTH 85 DEGREES S3 OWNERS CERTIFICATE AN EASEMENT'F'OIt SERVING PROVIONANDOTHERPROPF.NfY MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST,ADISTANCE OF 211.84 FEET TO A POINT ON ME WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOUT THENCE NORM 9 NTH ELECTRIC FOR ERVI NG THE SUBIE SERVICE 13 OMER'RESERVED O TY EGREES III MINUTES 59 SECONDS EAST SMEAS, N. 00-1017-W.)ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 8275 FEET(MEAS STATE OF 1) I FORANDOMMCOTO: 274FEEi)TO A POINT OF REND IN SAID LOT 7;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 16 MINUTES II SECCIAS MST RHEAS.S.88'3939' `S .)ALONG ME SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7. A DISTANCE OF 216.95FEETTOTXE SOUTHEAST COMEROF LOT2OFSAIO COUNTY OF 1 ESUBDIVISION;THENCE NORTH OR DEGREES 43 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST(MEIS. R OP195P WL ADDED ME HART LINE OF COMMON Wf ALTII EDISON COMPANY, AID LOT 2.A DISTANCE OF Wp0 FEET TO A POINT OF BEND IN SAID LOT 2:THENCE NORTH 9 DEGREES 56 MINUTES N THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NCG MARIETTA INC., A GEORGIA CORP.. IS ERIE FEE SIMPLE OMR OF LOT I OF ME MOVE SHOWN AMER DFCII ILLINOIS ILI ILLP'OIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, ECONDS EAST MEA3. N. 069325'E.)ALONG SAO EASTLINE OF LOTS ADISTANCE OF 17556 FEET(MEM. 17584 FEET)TOA SUBDIVISION AND HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND PLATTED INTO LOTSAS SHOWN ON MEATTACHED PIATANO NICORAND DINT: THENCE WESTERLY7LLONG A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO ME LEFT HAVING ARMOUR OF 32OFEET,ADISIDNCE OF32A2 INDICATED THEREON. FOR ME USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORM AS ALLOWED AMPROVIOEOBY STATMEANDSAD PLATIS COMCAST CABLE TELEVISION COMPANY GET(MESS. 32.34 FEET WHOSE CHORD NEAR. N. 7733BY W. 30.98 FESO TO ME POINT OF TANGENT OF SAO CURVE,THENCE TO BE MOM AS'KENDALL CROSSING PLO'. WE ALSO RESERVE ME MONTS FORANYELECTRIC.GAS,TELEPHONE,CMLETV OR OUTH74 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 09 SECONDS MST(MEAS, S,13-29'49'W.)ALONG SAD TANGENT.A DISTANCE OF 21481 FEET OTHER TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY UNDER FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WIN ME UNITED CITY OF YORKNLLE.THEIR SUCCESSORS THEIR RESPECTIVE LICENSEES, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY. TOCONSTRUCLOPEBATEREPAR MEAN. 214.73 FEET)TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORNAMOTERLY ALONG ME MST LINE OF SAID AND ASSIGNS. THE EASEMENT PROVISIONS WHICH PRE STATED HEREON AND ALSO HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AND ADOPTING SAME MAINTAIN,MODIFY, RECONSTRUCT, REPLACE, SUPPLEMENT, RELOCATE ANO REMOVE, FROM RMETORME,POLES.GUCANCHOR3, OT7 BEING ALONG A CURVE TO ME LEFT HAVING ARMIUS OF 1275 WFEEEADISANCEOF 377.77 FEET(MEA5.37)75 FEET UNDER THE STYLE AND TITLE THEREIN INDICATED. THEUNOERSIGNEOFURTXRCRDFIEST TTHEPROPMttHMEONGRAWNIS WIRES,CABLES, CONDUIT, MANHOLES,TRANSFORMERS, PEDESTALS, EQUIPMENT CABINETS OR OTHER FACILITIES USED IN OWES CHORD MESS. 122-1659-W. 376,37 FEET)TO ME MINT OF TANGENTOFSAOCURVE:THENCE NORM 30 DEGREES OR LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE YORKVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOO.OISTRICTA1151N KENDALLCWNry,ILLINOIS CONNECTION WITH UNDERGROUND TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRICITY,GAS. COMMUNICARONS. SOUNDS AND MINUTES IO SECONDS WEST(MEAS.N,30'49 1WW.)ALONG SAID TANGENT AND ME WEST ONE OF SAID LOT 7.A DISTANCE OF DATEOTHIS DAY OF ,2013 AO SIGNALS IN, OVER. UNDER.ACROSS, ALONG AND UPON THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN MTHIN ME DASHED OR WTTED 4.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3OF SAG RESUBOIVISION:THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 01 MINUTES LINES TOR SIMILAR DESIGNATION)ON THE PLAT AND MARKED -EMEMENP, -URLDY EASEMENT,'PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT'. ECONDS EAST(MEM. N. UW25'21-EJ ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3.A DISTANCE OF 27fiM FEET TO ME SOUTHEAST NCG MARIETTA INC. 'P.UE.' (OR SIMILAR DESIGNATION)ME PROPERTY DESIGNATED IN THE DECWATION OF CONDOMINIUM MINOR ON THIS PLAT AS ORNER OF SAID LOT 3:THENCE NORTHEAST MONO A NON-TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF MOO FEET,A DISTANCE OF 314 E. COMSTOCK 'COMMON ELEMENTS'. AND THE PROPERTY DESIGNATED ON ME PLAT AS'COMMON ARE(OR ARFIS}AND THE PROPER" WAR FEET(MEA3. 60.30 FEET WHOSE CHORD MEM N,40'3231'8357.79 FEET)TO ME POINT OF TANGENT AS SHOWN ON SAO OWOSSO, MICHIGAN 48867 DESIGNATED ON THE PLAT FOR STREETS AND ALLEYS,WHETHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE.TCGETNR WIN ME WGWS TO INSTALL ESUBDIVIAON PLAT: THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 04 SECONDS HART(MEAS,N.69'CMw E.)ALdJG SAID TANGENT REQUIRED SERVICE CONNECTIONS UNDER THE SURFACE OF EACH LOT AND COMMON AREA OR AREAS TO SERVE IMPROVEMENTS O THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 4 AND 5 O SAD RESUBOIVISION,A DISTANCE OF 317,47 FEET(MEAS.MUM FEET)TO APOINT OF THEREON,OR ON ADJACENT LOTS AND COMMON AREA OR AREAS. THE RIGHT TO CUT,TRIM OR REMOVE TREES.BUSHES,ROOTS I URVANRE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING ARADIUS OF SOTS FEET;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE,A Bp JEFFREY GEIGER SUMMER) AND SAPLINGS AND TO CLEAR OBSTRUCTIONS FROM THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE AS MAY BE REASONABLY REQUIRES (STANCE OF 41.53 FEET(WHOSE CHORD MEAS. N. 2P44'9'E 36.91 FEET)TO ME MINT OF TANGENT OF SAO CURVE BEING INCIDENT TO ME RIGHTS HEREIN GIVEN. AUTO THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON ME SUBDIVIDED PROPER"FOR ALL SUCH PURPOSES. E EASTERLY LINE OF SAG LOT S.THENCE NORTH 25 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST(MESS.N. 25'920'W. )ALONG NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL NOT BE PLACED OVER GRANTEES' FACILITIES OR IN, UPON OR OVER ME MORESBY"THIN ME DASHED OR AO EASTERLY LINE OF LOT E A DISTANCE OF 159.35 FEET OMEAS. 15936 FEET)TO ME NORTHEAST WHOM THEREOF,THENCE DOTI£O LINES(OR SIMILAR DESIGNATION) ON ME PLAT PNO MARKS D'EASEMEM','MUTY EASEMENT,-PUBLIC MLA" EASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF DRAW FEET,ADISTANCE OF 7143 FEET"WE CHORD MEAS. STATE OF ) EASEMENT ,-P.UG.- (OR SIMILAR DESIGNATION)WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF GRANTER, AFTER INSTAIABON OF . 82'13'46'E.71.43 FEET)TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT OF SAD RESUSDINSION:THENCE SOU NEASTERLY ALONG )GO ANY SUCH FACILITIES, ME GRADE OF THE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTY SHALL NOT BE ALMOST IN A MANNER SO AS TO INIRFRE WITH E WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 BEING ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 40.9 FEET,A DISTANCE OF 1949 COUNTYOF THE PROPER OPERATION AND MANTEIONCE THEREOF. EET(M FALL 1947 FEET WHOSE CHORD MEALS. & 12'24'52'W. 19.28 FEET) TO AMINT OF REVERSE CU AVAILABLE;THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SA0 LOT 6 BEING ALONG ACURVE TO ME RIGHT NAMES A RADIUS OF THEARTER OR ILLS ELEMENTS'SHALL HAVE ME MEANING SET FORTH FOR SUCH TERM IN ME'CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY 352.00 FEEL A DISTANCE OF 191.23 FEET(M EAS. 191.22 FEET MOO E CHORD MEAS.5,23NT51'E. 19116 FE TOME I. NOTARY ME TO BE IN E PERSON MOB E NAM E IS SSUBSCRIBED AM E HEREBY CE CEIRIHAT,JEFREY pCl'. CHAPTER 7fi51LCS fi05l2, AS AMENDED FROM TIMETOTIME OR OUTHWEST CORN ER OF SA D LOT 6:THENCE NORM 70 DEGREES OI MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST IMEA S.N.69-24 RV H)ALO.NG APPEAR ED B EFORE ME THIS AY I N PERSON AN D ACKNOWLEW ED THE FRED UTION OF ME ANN EXEC FIAT AND ACCOMPANY NG ME TERM 'COMMON AREA OR AREAS'IS OEFI NED AS A LOT. LARGE L OR AREA OF REAL PROPER",ME WHERE AL USE AND ME SO ME LI N E OF SA O LOT R A OISTAN C E OF 210,OR FEET TO A POI INT OF BEND IN SAD LOT B:M ONCE SOONER 19 DEGREES 57 I PODIUMS HIS AS ME FREE AN D VOLUNTARY ACT OF SAG CORPORATION, FOR ME USES AND WRPOSEL THERE(N SET FORM, ENJOYMENT OF WHICH 13 RESERVED IN WHOLE OR AS AN APPORTIONMENT TO ME SEPARATELY OWNED LOTS,PANCELS OR AREAS MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST(MEAS. 5.20-33'51'EI ALONG ME SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 AND SAO LINE BEING WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. EVEN THOUGH SUCH BE OTHRARE DESIGNATED O"ME PLATSYTERMS SUCH AS %TENDED SOUTHERLY. A DISTANCE OF 44500 FEET. THENCE NORM 70 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST SMEAS.N, GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AGO NOTANA SEAL THIS DAY OF ,2013 A0. 'ONLOTS','COMMON ELEMENTS', 'OPEN SPACE-,-OPEN AIREA','COMMON GROUNO\'PAIUUNG',AND'COIIMON AREA. THE TERM 9'2609'E.J.A DISTANCE OF 141.82 FEET(MEAL. 141.83 FEET)TOAPOW ON ME EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 7;THENCE SOUTH O4 'COMMON AREA OR AREAS'ANO'COMMON ELEMENTS'INCLUDE REAL PROPERTY SURFACED Ma INTERIOR DRIVEWAYS ANO MERCER 45 MINUTES OR SECONDS WEST(MEAS 5.04'08'55'W.)ALONG SAD EAST LINE OF LOT 7.ADISTANCE OF ON ME FEET WALKWAYS, BUT EXCLUDES REAL PROPER" PHYSICALLY OCCUPIED BY A BUILDING.SERVICE BUSINESS DISTRICT OR STRUCTURES O ME POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 17.7416 ACRES MORE OR LESS IN ME UNITED CI"OF YORHOLLE KENDAL COUN", NOTARY PUBLIC SUCH AS APOOL, RETENTION POND. OR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. ILLINOIS. CITY CLERK'S CERTIFICATE RELOCATION OF FACILITIES WILL BE DONE BY GRANTEES AT COST OF GRAMORLOT OWNER UPON MMEN REQUEST. WNERS CERTIFICATE STATE OF ILLINOIS ) FIE OF IWNOI3 ) COUNTY OF KENDALL]SKI ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CERTIFICATE F STATE OF ILLINOIS) COUNTY OF KENI APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY ME MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF ME UNITED CRYOF YORKVILLE.ILLINOIS BYORDINADENO. )SS AT A MEETING HELD THIS DAYOF 2613AO. COUNTY OF KUWAIT) THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT CASTLE BANK.A DIVISION OF FIRST NATIONAL SANKOF OMAHA ASTRUSIGE OFMUSTNUMBR2M2. IS THE FEE SIMPLE OWNER OF LOTS 2THROUGH 7 O THEABOVE SHOWN SUBDIVISION AND HAVECAUSEOME SAMETO BE THIS PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WON RESPECTTO ROADWAYACCESS PURSUANT SURVEYED AND PLATTED INTO LOTS AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED PIATANO INOICAIMMREON,FORMEUSESAND TO PARAGRAPH 20F'AN ACTTO REVISE THE LAW IN RELATION TO PLITS,ASAMENOED. APLANTRATMEETS MEPEWIREMEMS PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORM AS ALLOWED AND PROVIDED BY STATUTEMOSAD PLATIS TOBEMOWNAS'KENOALL CITYCLRK BETH WARREN CONTANEO IN THE DEPARTMENTS 'POLICY ON PERMITS FOR ACCESS DRIVEWAYSTO STATEHIGXWAYS'WILL BE REQUIRED BYME FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS WE/ COMPANY UNDER FRANC ISE AGREEMENT NTH CITY OROMR DEPARTMENT. ANDAS SIGNS.MEEAMENT PROVISIONS YONDER MICHIARE SAEDEMIGR NTALSO HEREBY OFYORKhRMEEIRSUCCESSORS CITY ADMINISTRATOR CERTIFICATE SAME UNIGNSMEEASE AND TITLE THEREIN WtlIONATESTATEOXREON AUTO FORMEREBYACKSTHAT GEPNOPDCPTME PAUL LOETE DATE: HEREUNDAWN IS LOCATED TITLEMR BO INDARIESO. THE UNDERSIGNED FORMER CERTIFIES MATMEPROPRTY STATE OF IWNOIS ) DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS HEREON DRAWN IS LOCgiEO WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE YORKVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 4115 IN KENDAL COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY OF KENDALL) SS REGION THREE ENGINEER DATED THIS DAY OF ,20MAO. THI513 TO CERTIFY THAT THE FINAL PLAT OF KENDALL CROSSING ROD WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR OF ME UNI TED INWVEANK,AOINLION OF FIRST NATIONAL BANK OFOMN1q PS TRUSTEE OFMVST NVMBER2842 CITY OF YORKVILLE. ILLINOIS THIS-DAY OF A13AD COUNTY CLERK CERTIFICATE 109 W VEUERTINCR KWAT STATE OF ILLINOIS) YORKVILLE. ILLINOISEQSBO AOMINILTRATOR BPATOLSQY COUNTY OF KENDALL) BY ATTEST: CITY ENGINEER CERTIFICATE PRINT NAME: PRINT NAME: L DEBBIE GILLETTE COUNTY CLERK OF KENDALL COUNTY, LLINOIS, OOHREBYCRTIFYMATMERE NODELIMUENTGRERA 1 STATE OF ILLNOR ) TAXES. NO UNPAO FORFEITED TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS.AND NO REDEEMABLE TAX SALES AGANSTME LAND INCLUDED IN )SS ME PIAT HEREON DRAWN. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT] HAVE RECEIVED ALL STATUTORY FEES IN CONNECTION MEN ME FLAT NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE COUNTY OF KENDALL) HEREON GRAND. STATE OF ILLINOIS) I, BRADLEY P. SANDERSON,CITY ENGINEER FOR ME UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ME REQUIRED GIVEN UNDER MY NAME AND SEAL OF THE COUNTY CLERK AT YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS,THIS DAY OF N13 AD. )AS IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED OR ME REQUIRED GUARANTEE COLLATERAL HAS BEEN FOSTER FORME COMPLETION CGUNTYOFKENOAy OF ALL REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. DATED ATYORKVILLE, ILLINOIS THII DAYOF MEAN. 1, ME UNDERSIGNED,A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE COUNTY AND STATE AFORESAO,WHEREBY CRRFYMAT,ME COON"CLERK: DEBBIE GILLETTE ABOVE NAMED OFFICERS OF CASTLE BANK,AUINSION OF FIRST NATIONAL BAMOFO AHMARE PERSONALYKN0WNTO ME TO BE THE PERSONS WHOLE NAMES ARE SUBSCRIBED TO ME FOREGOING CERTIFICATE, APPEAREDBEFOREME MIS DAY IN PERSON AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE EXECUTION OF ME MNEXEOPLATANDACCOMPMN NGINSTRUMEWSM5 EIRREE CITYENGINEER B RAOIEYPSANDERSON RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SAD CORPORATION FORME USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORM, SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE GIVEN UNDER MY NANO AUTO NOTPAIAL SEAL TXISDAY OF ,2013AO. STATE OF ILLINOIS ) STATE OF ILLINOIS) )55 )GS COUNTY OF KENDALL) COUNTY OF KENDAL) NOTARY PUBLIC THIS 13TO CERTIFY SURVEYED AND RONALD PLATE INTO LOTS ILLINOIS FOLLOWING SHOWN ON ME AFORESAID CDPLAT. STATE, NO. THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR REGARD IN THE RECORDER'S OFFICE OF AND KENDALL RECORDED RDEDI .ILLINOSON THIS DAY OF PLAN COMMISSION CERTIFICATE 352352. HAVE SURVEYED AND PLATTED INTO LOTS THE FOIIOWING PRWERtt PS SHOWN ON ME ATTACHED PLAT. . 2013, AD.AT O'CLOCK LL, ANDRECOROEOIN FIAT FILEp AS RE-SU OIVISION FTHE OF HAFOF THE NORTHWEST ONARTE PART OFSECTION N IOFCOUMRYSIOECRIER GE EANTOING DOCUMENT NO. STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ASUBOIRDPRI CI PARTOFAMINT THE THE NORTHWESTQUARTERLCOUNY,I28,TIS BEING MORE RORM, RA4GE7 EASTOF )55 THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE. KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS BEING MOREACCUPATELY DESCWBEO COUNTY OF KENDAL) HEREON. APPROVEDANDACCEPTEOBYTHEPLAN COMMISSIONOFMEUMTEDCITYOF YORKVILLEMIS OAYOF ,20MAO. AL SHOWN BY THE ATTACHED PLAT. WHICH IS A CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF SAD SURVEYAND PLATTING, ALLOISTANCESARE COUNTYRECORDER: DEDBIEGILLETTE SHOWN IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF AND ALL MEASURED BEARINGS ME TRUE NORM. I FORMER CERTIFY THAT ME MWERTY HEREON SHOWN 13 LOCATED WITHIN ME Cltt LIMITS OF ME UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE MICH IS EXERCISING ME SPECAL TOWERS AUTHORIZED BY DIVISION 12 OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL CODE AS MENDED, CHAIRPERSON: TOMUNDBLOM SECRETARY: 1 FORMER CERTIFY THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON ACNALLT EXIST ORMLL BE PLACEDANOI HAVE DESCRIBED MEN ON THIS PLAT AS REQUIRED BY ME PLAT ACT(7651LCS 209).MINIM TWELVE MODIFY OF ME RECORDING OF THIS PLAT(SECTION 127656 PRINT NAME: OF THE ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT OF 1989L BUT PRIOR TO MY CONVEYANCE OF ME 8340 DEPICTED HEREON CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATE AND THAT THEIR LOCATION. SIZE, TYPE AND MATERIALS ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. STATE OF ILLINOIS ) I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IS NOT LOCATED MMIN A SPECIAL FLOOD HARM AREA AS SHOWN )SS ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 1793C937G.REVISED FEBRUANY4,2003, COUNTY OF KENDALL) DATED AT PIANO, ILLINOIS THIS DAY Of` ,21113AO. ASSOCIATES /� Q TMSISTO CERTIFY OFTHETHAT MDCITY FYORKKENOALLCRSTHI PUDHPAYOF VEDPNOACCEPTW13AR YCRPND RB & ASSOCIATES CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKNLLE. ILLINOISMIS_GAT OF ,2%3A6 ' RONALD D.BAUR CONSULTING , INC ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL EXPIRES LM0-2014 EYOR%2352 MAYOR: GARY J, GOLINLq CITYCLERK: BEIXWARREN REGISiFATIONEXPIRES1F312014 PAGE 4 OF 4 REVISED FEBRUARY 12, 2013 ae® 4WMAINST0545 DESIGN 84-00475 REVISED MARCH & 2013 PL30) 55260545 iB4-0834]5 (E3OJ SSP-T4SZ WW W.IU-364GGBfB5.11BI DWG #2 012-14318-004 C (FINAL) cl�- 0 Memorandum EST. —� _ 1836 To: Plan Commission . � From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Q ® 0) CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Brad Sanderson, EEI, City Engineer KendA C.." iw Date: February 8,2013 LE Subject: PC 2012-11 Kendall Crossing PUD—Final Plat(Continued) Petitioner Reguest/Backaround: As the Plan Commission will recall, the Petitioner, James G. Ratos (Kendall Crossing LLC), received unanimous recommendation for approval by the Commission at the December 12, 2012 meeting for the proposed Preliminary Plat of the Kendall Crossing PUD which depicted a seven (7) parcel commercial subdivision, inclusive of a multiplex theater. However, during that meeting in December, the Petitioner asked that consideration of the Final Plat for Kendall Crossing PUD be continued until February, in an effort to address the review comments provided by the City's engineering consultant EEI in a letter dated November 20,2012(see attached). Since that time,the Preliminary Plat for Kendall Crossing PUD was approved with conditions,by the City Council on January 8, 2013. The Petitioner has submitted revised plans date stamped received February 5, 2013 for the proposed Kendall Crossing development and is requesting recommendation for Final Plat approval from the Plan Commission. Proposed Final Plat: In general, the Final Plat for the Kendall Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) depicts approximately 17.74 acres resubdivided into seven (7) parcels. Dedicated internal roadways and access drives are shown on the Final Plat (Lot 7) and will be privately maintained. A proposed new roadway access to IL Route 47 is also illustrated. The Final Plat has been reviewed by the City's engineering consultant EEI, for compliance with the Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standards for Specification requirements. Those comments regarding the plan are provided in the attached letter dated February 8, 2013. Below is a summary of those and other staff comments: 1. Staff recommends an overall Final Plat which fits onto a single page be provided. The following items need to be added to the plat: • Per state statute, it is a requirement to state the basis of the bearings. • Building setback lines need to be labeled on all sheets. • Lot numbers should be provided on each of the parcels which are included within the Kendall Crossing PUD. • Subdivision area table is required. • Adjacent street widths need to be dimensioned. • The west line of the lot width and acreage of 2.0769 needs to be dimensioned. • The south line of the subdivision with a bearing of N85°53'04"W needs to be dimensioned with a measurement bearing and distance. • The Point of Commencement and Point of Beginning need to be labeled. • Per Section 7.10.02 of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance, rear and side yard easements(5' min.) are required. • For the purpose of assigning addresses, we recommend proposed street names be provided. 2. The legal description needs to use measured distances and bearings in lieu of recorded distances and bearings. 3. The easements currently labeled as PUE needs to be referenced as Public Utility and Drainage Easements(PU&DE). 4. The minimum radius at right-of-way intersections is 25". The plat currently shows 20' radii. 5. All dimensions are to be the hundredth of a foot. Currently there are radii that are only to the nearest foot. 6. There are several existing and proposed utilities within the project limits;therefore: • All existing easements need to be shown and dimensioned on the plat. • An easement needs to be provided for any existing utility currently not within an easement. • All proposed utilities need to be placed in an easement with the exception of the privately owned and maintained storm sewer. • In order to ensure that all utilities are properly located in an easement, we recommend an exhibit be provided showing all existing and proposed utilities and their respective easements. 7. The City's weather warning siren is located within the Route 47 right-of-way at the southeast corner of the Kendall Crossing project limits and will require relocation due to the Route 47 improvements. The City's desire is to relocate the siren immediately west onto the subject property and within the proposed 15' PU&DE. The siren should be included on the above referenced exhibit. 8. The proposed easement encompassing the existing 48" storm sewer should be a minimum of 20' in width. 9. The proposed easements encompassing proposed water main should be a minimum of 15' in width. The easement should be centered on the water main itself,rather than off-set(centerline of water main is 5' off of easement limit). 10. If the perpetual easement(to cut and/or fill slopes)is no longer needed or benefitting the4 owners of the McDonald's Subdivision, it should be extinguished by a separate document and removed from the plat. 11. In regards to the area labeled"Reserved for Common Access",we offer the following: • Additionally label as a PU&DE to account for the proposed and existing utilities. • In order to clarify who will own, maintain and have rights to the common access area,we recommend that the area be a separate lot. If it is already anticipated to be a separate lot, please label as such(refer to Comment#1,Bullet Point#3 in above). • The proposed roads shown in the improvement plans as "Theater Road" and "Service Road" should be included in the above. • Access easement provisions need to be added to the plat. 12. An access agreement or easement will be required in order to ensure continual use of the existing ingress/egress points by adjacent property owners which currently have access to the proposed "Common Access" area. 13. The correct certifications need to be used. The correct certifications will be forwarded to the surveyor. • Page 4 of the Final Plat Plan Commission Certificate should remove the signature line for "Secretary". 14. The Engineer's/Owner's Certificate is not needed on the plat, rather it belongs on a Drainage Overlay. 15. Per Section 6.03.02 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance, the plat will need to be submitted in digital format to the City on NAD27 Illinois State Plane,East Zone,US Foot(IL-E). 16. Upon completion of the Final Engineering plan review, additional comments regarding the plat may be warranted. Staff Recommendation: Based upon the review of the Final Plat for the Kendall Crossing PUD, as well as the compliance with the City's Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standards for Specification requirements, sLaff recommends approval of the requested Final Plat subject to comments by the City Engineer in a letter dated February 8, 2013 as summarized in staff comments provided in a memorandum dated February 8, 2013. Proposed Motion: In consideration of testimony presented during a Public Hearing on December 12, 2012 and February 13, 2013 as well as discussions conducted at those meetings, the Plan Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request for Final Plat approval for the Kendall Crossing PUD, as presented by the Petitioner in a plan prepared by RB & Associates Consulting Inc. date stamped received February 5, 2013, subject to review comments prepared by the City's Engineering Consultant, EEI, in a letter dated February 8, 2013 as stated in a staff recommendation provided in a memorandum dated February 8, 2013 and further subject to {insert any additional conditions of the Plan Commission)... Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner's Application w/attachments. 2. Kendall Crossing PUD—Final Plat,prepared by RB&Associates Consulting Inc. 3. EEI Letter to the City dated February 8,2013 re:Kendall Crossing Final PUD Engineering Plan Review. 4. Staff Memo to Plan Commission re: PC 2012-11 Kendall Crossing PUD—Preliminary and Final Plat dated December 7,2012. 5. Copy of Public Notice. \ ) - ( - � [ PW � 4 � � z � A .4 : a ; y 22 ( ) \ 5 } ) \ ) \ \} > z < ; ; I �I 27 Continued - 3 . Contact Information Engineer: Name: RB & Associates Surveyor Address: 4 W . Main Street , Plano, IL 60545 Phone Number: 630-552-7452 Fax Number: 630-552-7702 Email Address: ron @rb-associates . net Land Planner: Name: N /A Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address : 4. Submit the following to the Community Development Department in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies. b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to Page 3 of this application "Petitioner Route, Step 1 , Fees" and/or contact the Community Development Department for verification of this amount). c. To begin the review process, the initial submittal must consist of: 1 . 12 sets of Preliminary Plans /Final plats folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope 2. 7 sets of Landscape Plans folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope 3 . 7 sets of Preliminary /Final Engineering folded to fit in a 10" x 13" enveloped. d. One CD containing one electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with exhibits), preliminary plan or final plat, landscape plans, engineering plans. Within one week of receipt of submittal, the Engineering Department will determine if it is complete or if additional information is needed. Once the submittal is complete, the plan council meeting date will be scheduled for the next meeting that is 6 weeks from this date. One week prior to your scheduled Plan Council meeting, you will be required to submit 15 full size preliminary/final site plans for the packets distributed to the members. United City of Yorkville Pre]iminary/Pinal Plat Application Revised:_ 1 .29.09 I 28 In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct. Date: / ✓ ' LI Petitioner(s) Signature: (All legal property owners signatures or t r a horized agents (i.e. Planner, Petitioner's Attorney, Engineer) must pear on his application.) I I, I i Subscribed and sworn to before me this Js>!►1_ day of 200 Ioff . " OFFICIAL SEAL " COLLEEN HANSON NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS §'iQ010ISSION EXPIRES 1012012015 THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED, I United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised:_ 1,29.09 i 29 PRELIMINARY PLAN/FINAL PLAT PETITIONER ROUTE Step 1 : Petitioner must submit a completed application, fees* and all pertinent materials to the Community Development Department minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. Petitioner is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, etc., to allow timely review by City. *Fees: 1 . Preliminary Plan Fee - $500/Final Plat Fee - $500 a. Engineering Review Fees - 1 .25% of the approved engineer' s estimate of cost of all land improvements, to be determined by City Engineer. b. Engineering Review Deposit - up to 1 acre = $ 1 ,000; over 1 acre but not over 10 = $2,00 over 10 acres, but not over 40 = $5,000 over 40 acres, but not over 100 = $ 10,000 over 100 acres = $20,000 c. Deposit for Outside Consultants - under 2 acres = $ 1 ,000 2 to 10 acres = $2,500 over 10 acres = $5,000 Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). Should Owner/Developer not pay these fees directly, they will be responsible for reimbursing the United City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs. Note: You must present your plan at each of the meetings below as indicated. i Step 2: Plan Council: The Plan Council meets the tad and 4th Thursday of the month at 9:00 j a.m. in the city conference room. Upon recommendation by the plan council, you will move forward to the Plan Commission Meeting. Attendees to this meeting include: Community Development Director, City Engineer, Building Department Official, Public Works Director, Director of Parks and Recreation, Fire Department Representative, and Police Department representative. Step 3 : For Preliminary Plans only; Park Board planning meeting: The Park Board makes recommendations on any Park Sites included in the development. The Park Board planning meeting is the 4`h Thursday of each month at 7:00 p .m. at the Riverfront Building, 201 W. Hydraulic Street. Step 4: Plan Commission : The Plan Commission meets the 2nd Wednesday of each month at 7 :00 p.m. in the Yorkville public library at 902 Game Farm Road. The Plan Commission will make a recommendation for the City Council's consideration. The Plan United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Applica[jon Revised:_ L29.09 _ i i 30 Commission consists of 10 members appointed by the Mayor, the City Attorney and City Land Planner. Step 5: The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Economic Development Committee meeting, held the first Tuesday of each month at 7 P.M. in the City Council chambers. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings. Step 6: City Council: The City Council meets the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month at 7 :00 p.m, in the Council Chambers at City Hall. This is where all City Council voting takes place. If this project has included an annexation and/or zoning petition, a Public Hearing will be held at this time with notice given by publication. Any annexation agreement, PUT) agreement or development agreement must be signed by the Petitioner prior to being voted on by the City Council. Prior to the recording of the final plat, the petitioner must pay the Administration Fee. This is equal to 1 .25% of the approved engineer's estimate of construction costs of land improvements, including but not limited to all public improvements to be dedicated to the City, mass earth grading, and quasi-public improvements to be maintained by the homeowner's associations such as private storm sewer, parking areas, and trails. Step 8: Final Plat recording instructions: Once the final plat is approved by the City Council and all required documents, bonds, and letters of credit are submitted to the city, the final plat may be recorded with Kendall County. Submit the final plat mylar to the Deputy Clerk for signatures. When all city signatures are in place, the developer or his surveyor may take the mylar to the Kendall County Clerk for his signature. The next step is to have six paper prints made and return to the Kendall County Recorder's office for recording. Kendall County requires the mylar and four paper copies. The City of Yorkville requires that you submit two recorded paper copies to the Deputy Clerk. Any copies you may require would be in addition to these. Agreement: I understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred administrative and planning consultant fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return (retaining a copy for your records) to the Depot Cleric, United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. Date Signature of Petitioner United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised'._ 1 .29.09 it 32 i 6. Dimensioned building setbacks, and as applicable; areas for off-street parking, trucking maneuvering and service, and open space/recreational facilities. ! 7. A schematic of existing or proposed public utility systems, including the size of sanitary sewers, storm water lines, & streetlights. 8. Existing vegetation and plantings. 9. Any other information required by the City, to clearly show the proposed site plan elements. CHECK LIST FOR FINAL PLANS i SECTION 1 : WRITTEN DOCUMENTS 1 . A land use application containing the following: Not Applicable Acceptable Deficient A. A statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the plan. - X — B. A development schedule, indicating the approximate dates for X construction of the Final Plan. C. Petitioners proposed covenants, restrictions, and conditions to be established as part of the Final Plan. D. Exceptions or variations to City Zoning or Subdivision Ordinances X being requested as part of the Final Plan, including the specifics of the Ordinance. Signage to come SECTION 2: GENERAL PLAN INFORMATION 1 . Must be drawn to accurate engineering scale. 2. Must contain the following information: A. Scale X B. North Arrow X C. Original and revised dates X D. Name and address of owner of record X — E. Name and address of site plan designer X — 3. The following information regarding contiguous property: X A. Location of contiguous property B. Zoning of contiguous property X C. Land use of contiguous property X 4. Site data to be provided in lower right hand corner; X A. Legal Description —X— B. Size of property in square feet and acres _ — C. Current Zoning D. Square footage & percent of site coverage with buildings — E. Square footage & percent of site coverage with pavement _ F. Square footage & percent of site coverage with landscaping X G. Number of parking spaces required by zoning ordinance _ — — H. Number of parking spaces to be provided X I. Number of buildings -- —X J. Number of dwelling units X ' K. Breakdown of dwelling unit bedroom types — United City or York vi Ile Pre[iminary/Final Plat Application Revised:_ 1 .29.09 i ICI 33 5 . Landscape data to be provided in lower left hand corner: A. Number of plantings by type X B. Size of plantings at installation X C. On-center spacing for hedges (Should be 3 feet apart) —_� D. Caliper size of all trees at installation X i SECTION 3: PLAN DATA REQUIREMENTS 1 . Dimensions of property. 2. Existing and proposed public and private streets, right-of-ways, driveways, all principal and accessory buildings and their uses, dimensioned building setbacks, lot sizes, sidewalks, off-street parking, service areas, open spaces, and recreation facilities. 3 . Preliminary architectural plans for all residential buildings, in sufficient detail to show basic building plan. 4. The existing and proposed vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, indicating their inter-relationship and proposed treatments of points of conflict. 5 . Existing and proposed utility systems, including sanitary sewers, water, electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, including their sizes. 6. Proposed public and private lighting systems. - 7. Existing and proposed easements for utility services, 8 . Proposed signage, indicating location and size. 9. Existing vegetation and plantings. 10. Proposed berming and fencing. 11 . The location and size in acres or square feet of all areas to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved as common open space, public parks, recreational areas, school sites, and similar semi-public uses. 12. Any other information necessary to clearly show the proposed site plan elements. I, I I United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised:_ 1 .29.09 LOT 7 (EXCEPT THAT PART DESCTRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST EASTERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 58 MINUTES I1 SECONDS WEST ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT, 309.0 FEER TO A SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7 FPR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 80 DEGREES 58 MINUTES I1 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 309.0 FEET TO A SOUTHEAT CORNER OF SAID LOT 7; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES, 45 MINUTES EAST ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7, 90.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 11 SECONDS WEST 140.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST 185 . 15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERNMOST LINE OF LOT 6 OF SAID RESUBDWISION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE NO. 47; THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 58 MINUTES 14 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERNMOST LINE 230.45 FEET TO THE SOUTHERNMOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE SOUTH 19 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST 192.30 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST 141 .82 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY LINE; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 211 .98 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING) OF THE RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 1 , COUNTRYSIDE CENTER, UNIT NO. I . YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS, AND ALSO THAT PART OF CENTER PARKWAY LYING NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY, AND ALSO THAT PART OF COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY LYING EASTERLY OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CENTER PARKWAY AND WESTERLY OF THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47, AND ALSO THAT PART OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 LYING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE THAT IS 70.0 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AN CONCENTRIC WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY EXTENDED EASTERLY, AND NORTHERLY OF A LINE T14AT 1S 60.0 SOUTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE MOST EASTERLY SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 7 EXTENDED EASTERLY, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. P.LN.# 02-28- 104-015 i i I I STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVE TO BE ACHIEVED With respect to Lot I of the re-subdivision of Countryside Center Developer seeks to construct a 10 screen multiplex theater with construction to commence approximately on January i 15 , 2013 . With respect to Lot 7 the legal description is for all internal roadways that are to be j private access drives governed by an owner' s access and easement agreement. The roadways will be privately maintained as part of the common area maintenance. An Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation will be formed by the Developer and will be continued to be maintained by the Developer James Ratos for the benefit of all lots within the property. Lots 2-6 are intended to be developed for commercial uses with the market likely being restaurants and uses related to the new theater. i i i I FINAL PLAT KENDALL CROSSING PUD D HEM BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOT 7 OF THE RESUBOIVISION OF PMT OF BLOCK I OF COUNTRYSIDE CENTER UNIT N0.1 ' ( ' I 6 1 D 7EEASTOF THE TIHIRD PRINOPAL MERIDIAN INTHE UNITED CDYOF YORKVILLE.KENDALL SECTION 28,ILLINOIS. 37 NORTH,WOE II I F OJ 201' ^/ LCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I V m I I DEPARTMENT 0' 50' 100' 150' 1.�uLHERN LOSe1� Scale: 1" - 50 I dl LOT 6 Et)I 5 LOC 4 LOT 30 Gt t � LOT 3 LOT ,41 PARKWAY LOT 42 RADIUS.40' REG.L=19.49' MEAS.L=1SAT / CH�5.12°24'5T"N.19.26' 1 ' �g\DE t43' / `101f� RgD1U5�S 7�43L 7 G0" f` S5'D_48"E.71.43 yoav;l�-InNeo n°o, m mn }uw \ s LOT 6 KN` 4� � LEGEND: cns1��.,a.qN his LOT 5 ;,� "s/ 62\00 \ N^T�yw°NS�w� FWno IRONPIPE _ • TW JV"'t2 !P�P �N\\i- To6\ 99 / �'\ yOP'A'IEPN tJINU FOUND Caoss In WHO. = x . paV�iONEO a' 'm �cN' 69°r �� \ \ e g 1oxµKV1 oNE0�2 SETCORONPIRUBr NOR G°�jyiNY'y oEO�e WE RADIUS=25' Rg1.63'41.53' _ M/Fp' i�a // 1tlr\\ \ N Yn yo t POaucunury EASE. = PuB GONN1N 14U LOT MEAS.L50"E.36.91' µt5E5 \ 1yoCo`t EOe- A1Np N.21°4% cONm4"'0&pfo 6 \ 69" 59E�S�// ' s n+E. 5p9oYncEOS2 P6GNN.69°45 \\ ` \\ P� oNME py5� 5� c LOT 3 ��{ 1.0132 ACRES \\ \ N N yon' 1",E x RADIUS 60 0. DN.=N 40 J23 603p_59 .949'// 54992 E /�UE \ _ 2j6 20/ 221b9A \ \ \\� m \ / SOgVIP \°tli TO u, EXCEPTION 2 1.0400 ACRES LOT 4 /i/ xa \\ 2\ \ °>\ \\m o \\ 1.1507 ACRESTp\\\ en \C/ \\ o\\ 1.7391 ACRES \ ay\ \\ v, a\\ %\ 45 RB & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING, INC 4 W MAIN STREET DESIGN FIRM 4 PLANO,IL 60545 184-004475 PAGE 1 OF 4 (630)552-7452 wwwstrasseciates.net DWG 9 2012-14310-001 (FINAL) FINAL PLAT KENDALL CROSSING PUD BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOT OF THE RESUBOIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 1 OF COUNTRYSIDE CENTER UNIT NO. 1 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ° � at"1� _.a2•E. 5].)9' / $. 19 4T'�i E sWo/ / \ \ 0 DB 10 2160A / LR d,0 /5 5OE \ \ \\. W/yam 5 \ o, 10 °'21 P mom, i 66x2 / \ \\ �N N 25 .\ \ \ m / $oESEm \ \ N EXCEPTION 2 100' 150' 1 \ / / NiES iiµ ' / \\n \\ 2\ ��`%'� / \\ �\\ \ \ 1 .8400 ACRES \ 1 .1507 ACRES Scale: I " = 50' 1 ,7391 ACRES / W' A'oo \\\ 6gg05 W \ \ �\T� SpUV \ \ �i/1�54054. \ ° \ "!>J•d9�. 2\�_� SE10� $ N 4AJ 2.0769 ACRES LOT 5 ^ \\°� \ j. 5.84V6'H'E " \ � ( SMIb .>.i• �J\ l •�\ °p \ \e — lei se,me �" la vue \ OR figVSp' ,A� La6fi IV FUe \\ P°\ \ �\ s1B�sE1=AFK .4 ,e9a �r'S� fiy.TS"fUE ,SAVE F1,� \�'\\ \\ g \ w smE�,,0NOK1 \�. — ?v' J ii° PCG N v m I I a( {� LOT o o \e�(i \ \\ � i - MMoN , �e I a i,D IP iP -(J \{n\ T \ 40� \ O` ^/ �� d&GB' fi254 ISPUE Rc22a Co 04 I I 6y tn�'/ ^ R=20a Lo9043' �. n \'x.\ \ r° LR"2z3' Saas.oafiE JET zc.'4a °4 OT Lc12494' L=822U B0IN.R5•E o R=x2a ma.Br IsvoE R \\ \ \ \ I 1 / _ N1555W'E1401�45i InwE LEGEND: " 15P1E' IRPaE I FOUND IRON PIPE _ • \ \ \\ \\�� I I I FOUND CROSS CONC. _ % IRON PIPE 0 SET CONC SURVEY MON. = PUBUCU LWYEASE. POE M6P5° o V as ui \ 7.0586 ACRES ' /\ pQ ° IN ouim Dm�i Pam \\\� N24•zt'zrE ) \\\-\ $I I ' o �. o ' .5 \ Iroz / VVV "� I ENpp I I e D- OSNE 'LONEB �{ 1MNATIONALBANKOFDOWALB Om I 1 Rp �\ %JAMES PANICS mp 41p y GENE /� 207 W. KENDALL OWVE ° mmSAn YORKVILLE, IWNOIS SPAS ZONED S-2 REC. N. 00 44349" W. 1 MEAS. N. Ot°19'54" W. 150.0' LJ EXIST.WILRY EASEEKINT _ _ REC° S. 89° i6' 11" % 216.95' P4•'rsa� \� ;n PEE, $ESepG X15 / n0 MEAS. 5. 88°39'39° W. 216.95' ° °f°Y� \ � s�ipeE ev, R020 2 �W�a�s1 DEED LL —z I °,2326 N. 80°58'II. W 140.35' sg69 bry' °_LZ MEAS. N. 81°34'16^ W. F' 140.05' DEED _ N. 04°45'00• E. 90.00' / 04-45'M- 0 DEED N. 65°53'94° W. 2n 64' EXCEPTION 1 MEAS. N. 04°08'55" E. 90.00' EASEMENTPEYBOPMUGE Ir EASEMENrvERmc mloae Pe 04°4 _- xSEL, EwkimrrixiD'uolueenLSl I 0q°08q] W ..0 PBR4,EE RECORD AND MEASUREOTABLE I wl w aFCgl�oigigptpt 'EFlTK>` 4i0 D I RB & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING , ING c • ® 4 W MAIN STREET DESIGN FIRM# PLANO . IL 5 PAGE 2 OF 4 (30) 552-]4 2 mm.rbassocates.net OWG # 2012-14318-002 C (FINAL) FINAL PLAT KENDALL CROSSING PUD BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOT Z OF THE RESUBOIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 1 OF COUNTRYSIDE CENTER UNIT NO. 1 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH. RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ll mJ\ OA` /m \ PUE tb°O6•�pq W 2 14 T N�, 12 h R G' S 3 2 ry 100' 150' MEPS' 1 ° �� 090 w w arm \\� 7.0566 ACRES \\ \\ \\ \\ I 15 n Scale: 1 " = 50' 1 � pR A2 yo°� 9 b 4omNi \\\ m o/ i) / �I i $ �Np P� OsJO74AA.9A o o sA° a A,. X\ M ' W O a) Of�p \ \ _ In PUE ' Flo D iVvT0J \\i � ti ED 1_01' 2 9� ',�p9�� v �6„',�� I EO E5 )o VO 1 � \\\ bm 11'SR/ 0- TO uSN S T 1s1NATIONALBANKOFORTALS O p F \ \ yry 4 GOTOLA1 2mWENDaODUKE Z'i my \�\\\ e > YORKVILLE. ILLINOIS 6058B y/� / D ZONED SS 'CO, `\\ LEGEND: -G REC. N. 00°43'49' W. 94.00' ° \�-- \ \\o FOUND IRON PIPE _ • MEAS. N. 01°19'54” W. 94.00' I I LLI FOUND CROSS IN CONC. SEi/e"IRON PIPE O 'E"' SETCONC.SURVEY MON.= 1500' _ _ _ _ _ 4' \ •oH KNIOVU i _ 1 PUBLICUTILITYEASE = BUD 6, O EM6T. GROW EASENExr REC. S. 89° 16' 11° W. 216.95' 219 s \\N �`V sE sES6� '18515\, / J — — — — — —I MEAS. 5. 88°39'39" W. 216.95' °GF�y i\\\ sU M rV _ & \V z^ /0i X232 TNT 1849 DEED N. 80°58'1 t' W LL I \L �G'EEO 5.89 MEAS. 14035 X69 0 �Ly 1__` ___ i D�,S '4 81°3416" pO E:b E' szlry" T_ M 140.05 W. °q0 DEED N. 85°53'04` W _—�M__�_ DEED N. 04°45'00' E. 90.00 PDPLID ORGRra MANAGE �� I �� 2¢0. 03 217.64' .-____s__EXCEPTION 1 MEAS. N. 04-08P55- sD.DO• EASEMENTPERCOCMI08911 4+ IYATEq _ ` \ ' RE Ms1x SERF _ PROVISIONS FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS ACCESS EASEMENTS �I I \J 11`� \` / �K/ j DEEDS' S O4°45 LOT SMOT 1-0 ( 1 I r�l` I aftvg a- F Rr T 1 04°0642°WF TRY MIRROR MY LOT SURN ME MCI MID ASSUMA MAIL BE W. NO TO GI= RM` U°ro RECORD AND MEASURED TABLE p RrF wI SATURDAY D SO EO�gF OF nnN I 14 AND PREGSTOIC BE GIE OEHISTS ANDREW SAY ACCESS ANDECARE. SAO LOT SMALL ALSO BUSIN RUGErcs roi.EaRttMilTCatYwnnwa µOnccESS n4pEeuErrt sx xFi+ouL UVOSSxc L-2= RE S.80555'26' E. 69395M E75. 5203TIMPA. 695 I 'gI I EWESSNmpyy,I EM rp_ n.159 GRFOxF IWESyO°` -I ,^ I L3=RED, N. 70.OY02'E. 125.00' MEAS. N. 69'23 W'13' E. 1125 W ow o V7/ L4=REC. 5.80'5911"E. 14W' MEAS. &81°3TOO-E. 14.50' �I I jw I UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE EXCEPTION 3 O EASEMENT PROVISIONS 6I I REC. N.80•es Iw PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT CASTLE 1IIw .1:NmLNOI1Wrv.LE I F4E4s N.Bf 13�e'W. 21096, --II DoPm ILLINOI6�115 I 1s1 STATE BANK&TRUST CFRM20VERPPRK FRIEIX I6Cdi cd.I EOlOMSiMIERCM�E OmExawuc unLmES,Nn ZONED B-2 ORKSUZ FLUMMS Nm THFR ROACINE SUCCE5E00.4 NU PARKS SUED WE MFK I /�1 \,j IZ %EQIULON ENTERPMSE$LLC � I MORKAS OF EMSTYN FORTURNES MINUTES BY ME CITY 1iTPCvCRUMIP J,mOWL TOCMSTRUCT. UUTMLSUGARC T,RE°ne ACKIE REETSM t'l3"�t_rq.._„ I,FACE CASTLE BANK TR%2584 8 t �} /+[yj� u Iw TON. TEXAS uslE OU RAW EWCOW CARS, MID ML MCESSUry 121 W. LINCOLN HAW. HOUSTON. TEXAS 7210 BUD ONES UNISYS MATURE ASUMEM', RECORD "GIEW CIATAGEN TO TELEPHONE ME PUY FOR °eKALB, I ILLINOIS X115 .1` i t � � � i ZONED b2 SUM USES ME TOGETHER mm WE GULF TO NOWL REwiNE) SOURCE CONNECTIONS MAN ME Sw'u£ OF AM LOT TO SERVO ZONED B-2 j / � � IS FACTURES�PM�uRlvrsER Mm'° xKERVRr Mmpcm 1.1 )) I` o RISCOMPRET. FAST REMOVE CRIME STIM INSPECT EMITTED FOR Cle TRANSMISSION ANY DISTISRUTRU SCYCA AND RETROTY lWIN I WC.C STAB ECESSARV No SWUNG WOOD BUGGY No SYNDROME ��WGET ROmJAwcrt OF ASSUCCA I �� MCOONALDS CORP. I MEDWARD J. SCHMIDTE, _ _ 1975 DOWNER PLACE ME MGM TO MC MIT OR FURNACE MLY dL3116TWTUALCM, RECONSTRUCTOR REG A WI DOM- RFPU6/'FMULIA AURORAE ILLINOIS fiU505 I WHICH BERNARD d1�MD DIISTGGM SYSTEMS MIT) MONDEY M URCUWC TEP[TO. NO POSTMARK MCENTER OS OPERATOR OR �E ZONED B-2 WE MMOH HANDS FUTURES SUCCESSIONS REDFORCUADED m s rw° :s T A o na:D�;ax U Y ;Mw m Er V ROUTE 3A MALL BE DAR IN MACY A CARTER gin,a OR ST uVI° 1RI G SYD, M GYTHE�EIW nE � (/ETERAN BARREN V3 COSTING CAUSE Ma° mIrID GEDRNPARGgOW TEG��` gEew �FmoEw� S PARKWgy)MKXUWM BUT ACT ANTED ACE NO SELIGMAN VMH RESPECT TO MAKCE WORL. MGDAYM Mb�OUND MLrTOUCH CREATED SO M N MAN SUMBLE BOB NwE TO COW ALAN MR ASPIAi OR CONCRETE SURFACE. To tONE U NE55 BOUNCE M S AND ADDITIONAL UTILITY EASEMENTS OF RECORD NU I I UM11E0¢AMEMSMS EGRETS TELEPHONE AGE TECKC TICESELOG;AM SUBJECTUO PREVIOUSLY CROSSING SU COMMECINT IRA m72404 E7Y-Aie OF THE WINES FEE SLID SWAGGED ¢ UrvO[RmECOxsTRUCnavrcTwsEw. 2ONE060•�NE55 SGxl GiE,GW". ZONE�0�NS5\N O 09.5 55 SE?NE1!➢34 CM9 JOGE9`)5NE _.,40&:rE9`' RB & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING , INC PAGE 3 OF 4 =® P ANOI, IL 60545 DESIGN 0,D475 (630) 552-7452 vnvw.rb-assOCiates.net DWG#2012-1431"03 C (FINAL) FINAL PLAT KENDALL CROSSING PUD BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF LOT] OF THE RESUBOIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK 1 OF COUNTRYSIDE CENTER UNIT NO. i BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE ] EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OWNERS CERTIFICATE EASEMENT PROVISIONS AN EASEMENT FOR SIi RVI6G THE SUBDIVISION AND OTHER PROPERTY THAT PART OF LOT]OF ME RESUBDIVISION OF PART OF BLOCK I OF COUNTRYSIDE CENTER UNIT NO. I IN ME UNITED CITY OF STATE OF GEORGIA) WITH ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE IS HEREBY RESERVED YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 7S.1982 BEING DR FORANUGHANIED'yO', DESCRIBED BY COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT]:THENCE NNTX M DEGREES45 MINUTES DO COUNTY OF SECONDS EAST ALONG ME EAST LINE OF SAID LOT], ALSO BEING THE WESTERLY EIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE NO. COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANC 47, A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET FOR ME POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORM W DEGREES 59 MINUTES IT SECONDS WEST THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NCG MARIETTA INC.,A GEORGIA CORP., IS ME OWNER OF LOT 1 AS SHOWN OF ME MOVE SHOWN AMERITECH ILLINOIS ak.a ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY. FE PARALLEL WITH ME SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT], A DISTANCE OF ROLL ET:THENCE SOUTH 70 DEGREES 02 MINUTES al SUBDIVISION AND HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED AND PUTTED INTO LOTS AS SHOWN N ME ATTACHED PLAT AND NICORAND SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.14 FEET TO A POINT OF BEND IN SAID LOT];THENCE SOUTH DEGREES 45 MINUTES W INDICATED THEREON, FORME USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORTH AS ALLOWED ANO PROVIDED BY STATUTE ANO SAID PUT Is CONICAST CABLE TELEVISION COMPAW7 SECONDS MST ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF HAD LOT 7. A DISTANCE OF I460 FEET:THENCE NO"85 DEGREES 15 TOBEMOWNAS -KENDALLCROSSINGPUD'. WE ALSO HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE AGE MCWTME SFMEUNDERTHE STYLEANO MILE MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 217,92 FEET TO A POINT ON ME WESTERLY LINE OF SAD LOT]:THENCE NORM 00 NERONINOICATED. ME UNDERSIGNED FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT THE PROPERTY HEREON DRAWN IS LGCNEDWWN ME iHEIRRESPECTIVELICENSEES, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS,JOINTLY ANOSEVEPKLY, TO CONSTRUCT,OPERATE,REPAIR DEGREES IS MINUTES 59SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE. A DISTANCE OF02]S FEET TOA POINT OF BEND IN SAID BOUNDARIES OF THE YORKVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT#11519 KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS MANTAIN. MOUFY, RECONSTRUCT. REPLACE,SUPPLEMENT. RELOCATE AND REMOVE FROM TIME TO TIME POLES,GUYS,ANCHORS. LOT ];THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES LIMINUTE511 SECONDS WESTALONG ME SOUTHERLY LINE OFSAO LOT 7,ADISTANCE OF DATED THIS DAY OF ,2013AD. WIRES, CABLES. CONDUIT, MANHOLES,TRANSFORMERS. PEDESTALS, EQUIPMENT CABINETS OR OTHER FACILITIES USED IN 21695 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 O SAID RESUBDIVISION:THENCE NORTH 03 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 49 CONNECTION WITH UNDERGROUND TRANSMISSION AGO DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRICITY,GAS, COMMUNICATIONS, SOUNDS AND SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 9400 FEET TO A POW OF BEND IN SAID LOT Y THENCE NCG MARIETTA INC. SIGNALS IN. OVER. UNDER, ACROSS. ALONG AND UPON THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN WITHIN THE HASHED OR GORED NORTH 06 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF LOTS.A DISTANCE OF 1]5.56 FEET TO A POINT; 314 E. COMSTOC LINES(OR SIMILAR DESIGNATION) ON THE PITTARD MARKED 'EASEMENT. -UTILITY EASEMEW','PUBLIC URLIIYFASEMENP. THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A NONTANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RALIU30F 320 FEELADI STANCEOF 32.42 FEETTO OWMSA GEORG1A48867 'PRE- (ORSIMIA DE5IGNATION)THEPROPERry DESIGNATEOINTHEDECIARARONOFCONMMINIUMMDpRONTHISPUTM THE POINT OF TANGENT OF SAID CURVE:THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES AS MINUTES W SECONDS WESTALONG SAID TANGENT A 'COMMON ELEMENTS',AND THE PROPERTY DESIGNATED ON THE PLAT AS'CO.MMONAREAORAREAS',AND T EPROPERTY DISTANCE OF 214.64 FEET TO ME NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2;THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG ME WEST LINE OF DESIGNATED ON THE PLAT FOR STREETS AND ALLEYS.WHETHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE. TOGETHER VAN THE RIGHTS TOINSTALL SAID LOT 7 BEING ALONG A CURVE TO WE LEFTHAVING A RADIUS OF 127500 FEEL A DISTANCE OF377.77 FEETTONE POIW By:JEFFREY GEIGER(MANAGEFU REDUCED SERVICE CONNECTIONS UNDER ME SURFACE OF EACH LOT AND COMMON AREA ORAREAS TO SERVE IMPROVEMENTS OF TANGENT OF SAID CURVE: THENCE NORTH 30 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST ALONG BAD TANGENTAND ME THEREON, OR ON ADJACENT LOTS AND COMMON MCA OR AREAS, THE RIGHT TO CDT TOM OR REMOVE NEES,BUSHM, ROOTS WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 7.ADISTANCE OF 44.10 FEETTO THE SOVTXWESTCORNEROF LOT 3 OFMORESUBOMSIN;THENCE NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE AND SAPLINGS ME TO CLEAR OBSTRUCTIONS FROM THE SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE AS MAY BEREARMABLY REWIRED NORTH 70 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 3.A DISTANCE OF 2769 FEET TO ME INCIDENT TOME RIGHTS HEREIN GIVEN.AND THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON ME SUBDIVIDED PROPERTY FOR ALL SUCH PURPOSES SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3;THENCE NORTHEAST ALONG A NON-TANGEW CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF WAS FEET.A STATE OF GEORGIA) OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL NOT BE PLACED OVER GRANTEES'FACILITIES OR IN, UPON OROVERMEPRNERTY WITHIN MED]SHEDOR DISTANCE OF 5949 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENT AS SHOWN ON HAD RESVBDI ISION PUT;THENCE NORM fig DEGREES BE )BE DOTED LINES(OR SIMILAR DESIGNATION)ON THE PLAT ADS MARKED-EASEMENT.'UTILITY RGEMEN", ' LADS UTILITY MINUTES"SECONDS EAST ALONG SAO TANGENT AND THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 4 AND 5 OF SAID RE5UBDAI510N,A DISTANCE COUNTY OF EASEMENP,-P.UE.- (OR SIMILAR DESIGNATION)WITHOUT ME PRIOR NATION CONSENT OF GRANTEES AFTERINSTMARIONOF OFSCAT FEETTO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF ACURVE TO ME USET HAVINGAMONS OF 2500FEET:THENCE MY SUCH FACILITIES. THE GRACE OF THE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTYSHALL NOT SCATTERED INAMANNERSOAS TO INTERFEREWITH NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAO CURVE,ADISTANCE OF 41.53 FEET TO ME POINT OF TANGENT OF SAO CURVE BEING ME THE PROPER OPERATION AND MANTENANCETHEREOC EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOTS:THENCE NORM 25 DEGREES 14 MINUTES40 SEWNDSWESTALONG SADEADERLY LINE OF LOT I. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE COUNTY ANDSTATEM ORESAD, DO HETUYCERTFYTNAT.JEFFREY GEIGER, IS PERSONALLY MOWN TOME TO BE ME PERSON WHOSE NAME ISSU&SCRISED TO THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATE, THE TERM'COMMONELEMEWS'SHALL HAVE THE MEANING SET FORTH FOR SUCH TERM IN ME'CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY S, A013TANCE OF 159.35 FEETTO THE NORMEASTCORNERTXEREOF;THENCE EASTERLY PLONGp CURVETO ME RIGHT GEIGER, BEFORE ME THIS DAY IN PERSON AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE EXECUTION OFTHE ANNUEDPUTANOACCOMPANYINO ACT'. CHAPTER 765 ROD 60W. AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME. HAVING A RADIUS OF 262500 FEET. A DISTANCE OF 7143 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6 OF SAID RESUSDMSION: INSTRUMENTS FOR ME USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORM AS HIS FREEAND VOLUNTARYACT. THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAD LOT 6 BEING ALONGACURVETOTHE LEFTHAVINGARADIUSOF ME TERM'COMMON AREA OR AREAS'IS DEFINED AS A LOT, PARCEL OR AREA OF REAL PROPERTY.ME BENEFICIAL USE AND 40.00 FEET.AGISTANCE OF 1949 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVANRE;THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAD WESTERLY GIVEN UNDER MY HMO AND NOTARIAL SEAL THIS OAYOF ,2013AO. ENJOYMENT OF MICH IS RESERVED IN MOLE OR AS AN APPORTIONMENT TO ME SEPAFANDYOWNEO LOTS,PARCELS ORAREAs LINE OF SAID LOT 6 BEING ALONG A CURVE TO ME RIGHT HAVING A RADIUSOF235200 FEET.ADISTANCE OF 191.23 FEETTO WITHIN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. EVEN THOUGH SUCH BE OTHERWISE DESIGNATEDON THE PUT BY TERMS SUCH AS THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE NORTH 70 DEGREES 01 MINUTES ED SECONDS WESTAONG ME SOUTH THE -OUTLOTS-, -COMMON ELEMENTW. -OPEN SPACE', -OPEN AREA . -COMMON GROUND'. 'PARWNG'.AND-COMMON AHWg THETERM OF SAID LOT 6. AOISTANCE OF 210.06 FEETTOA POINT OF BEND IN SAID LOTH THENCE SWIH 19 DEGREES57MINUTES46 NOTARY PUBLIC- 'COMMON AREAORAREAS'AND'COMMON ELEMENTS'INCLUDE REAL PROPERTYSURFACED WIN INTERIOR DRINWAYSAND SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6 AND SAO ONE BEING EMENDED SOUTHERLY,ADISTANCE OF WALKWAYS, BUT EXCLUDES REAL PROPERTY PHYSICALLY OCCUPIED BYA BUILDING, SERVICE BUSINESS DISUCTUORSTRUCNRES 445.80 FEET: THENCE NORM 10 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 14 SECONDS EAST,A DISTANCE OF 141.82 FEET TO A POINT ON ME EAST ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CERTIFICATE SUCH AS A POOL. RETENTION PoNO. OR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. LINE OF SAID LOT 0 THENCE SOUTH 04 DEGREES 45 MINUTEE500 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAC EAST LINE OF LOT].ADISTANCE OF 589.66 FEET TO ME POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 17.7416 ACRES MORE OR LESS IN ME UNITED CITY OF YORKVITE$ STATE OF ILLINOIS) RELOCATION OF FACILITIES WILL BE DONE BY GRANTEES AT COST OF GRAMOBAOT OWNER.UPON WRITTEN REQUEST. KENDALL COUNTS.ILLINOIS. )SS COUNTY OF KENDALL) CITY ENGINEER CERTIFICATE THIS PUT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WITH RESPECT TO ROADWAY ACCESS PURSUANT STATE OF ILLINOIS ) OWNERS CERTIFICATE TO PARAGRAPH 2OF 'M ACT TO REVISE THE LAW IN RELATION TO PLATS',M MENDED A PIFN MATMEEIS THEREQUIREMENTS )SS CONTAINED IN THE DEPARTMENTS 'POLICY ON PERMITS FOR ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO STATE HIGHWAYS'WILL BE REQUIRED BY ME COUNTY OF KENDALL) STATE OF ILLINOIS ) DEPARTMENT. }GS THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE HI S FLAT OF KENDALL CROSSING PUD 213AAWROVED BYME CITY ENGINEER OFTHEUNITED COUNTY OF NENCAIj PAUL LOETE DATE. CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MIS DAYOF 2013 AD. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT KENDALL CROSSING LLO IS THE OWNER OF LOTS 2THROUGH]OF ME MOVE SHOWN SUBDIVISION DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS AND HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED ME PUTTED INTO LOTS AS SHOWN ON ME ATTACHED PIATAND INDICA TED REGION THREE ENGINEER THEREON.FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORM AS ALLOWED AND PROVIDED BY STATUTE AND SAO PLAT IS TO CITY ENGINEER: PRINTNAIE RE TLE OTTER NNOICATEDRTTHE UNDERSIGNED ALSO FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT ME PROPERTY HEREON DRAWN IS LOCATED WITHIN PLAN COMMISSION CERTIFICATE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE YORKVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL OISTRICTNKSIN KENDALLCWNTY, IWNOB STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )55 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) DATEDTHIS DAYOF� 20RAO. COUNTY OF KENDALL) )SS COUNTY OF KENDALL) KENDAL CROSSING LLD REVIEWED BY THE PLAN COMMISSION OF ME UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE THIS MY OF 2013 A6 207 W. KENDAL GAVE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE FINAL PLAT OF KENDAL CROSSING PUD WAS PRESSOR)BY ME MAYOR MOODY COUNCIL OF YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS 60560 THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE. ILLINOIS THIS DAY OF , W13 AD. CHARPERSN: TOMLINDBLOM SECRETARY: By:JAMES G. RATIOS(MANAGER) CITY ADMINISTRATOR CERTIFICATE MAYOR: cAHV J.DOurvsw cm CLERK; eE1H WARREN STATE OF ILLINOIS ) COUNTY CLERK CERTIFICATE NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE )SS COUNTY OF KENDALL) STATE OF ILLINOIS) STATE OF ILLINOIS)CERTIFY)S$ THISI$ YORKVILL , MATMEFINALPUT OF PUD13AD. ROVE00YTNECIiYPDMINISTRATOROF ME ) COUNTY OF KENDALL) CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS THISDgYOF .2013 A0. COUNTY OF KENDALL) 6 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FORME COURTYPNDSTATEPFORESAD,DO HEREBYCERTFYTHAT. I. DEBBIE GILLETTE,COUNTY CLERK OF KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. CERTIFYMATIFINDNOUNPADCUMENTORMLINOUENT JAMES G. GATOS(MANAGER) IS PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE R W E ISSUMCRISEO TOME AOAlINI5Mgi0R BART Ol$ON TAXES,OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS,MONO REDEEMABLE TAX SALES AGANSTTHE LAND HEREON DESCRIBED. FOREGOING CERTIFICATE, APPEARED BEFORE ME THIS DAY IN PERSON AND ACKNOWLEDGED ME EXECUTION OF ME GIVEN UNDER MY NAME AND SEAL OF THE COUNTY CLERK AT YORKVILLE. ILLINOIS,THIS DAY OF .2013AD. ANNEXED PLAT AND ACCOMPANYING INSTRUMENTS FOR THE USES AGO PURPOSES THEREIN SET FORM AS HIS FREE AGO SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE VOWNTARYACT. STATE OF ILLINOIS I GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF A,3AD. )55 COUNTY OF KENDALL) COUNTY CLERK: DEBBIE GILLETTE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I. RONALD D. BAUER,AN ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN AFORESAID COUNTY ME STATE. NO. 2352. HAVE SURVEYED AND PLATED INTO LOTS THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON ME ATTACHED PLAT: NoTARr Pu9uc- RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE BEING A RE-SUBDIVISION E MT H LF LOT ]OF NORTHWEST ION OF PART OF BLOCK 1 OF COUNTRYSIDE TOWNSHIP 37 RAIL RA UNIT NO. , BEING THIRD N510N ME OF PACT OF ME WESTN E OFMENORTXWERWARIER D SECTION 28,TOWOIS BEING DONE RANGE]ELY EAST DES RIBEDM PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN ME UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDAL COUNTY,ILLINOIS BEING AIOREACCURgTELT DESCRIBED ABOVE STATE OF ILLINOIS ENGINEER'S/OWNER'S CERTIFICATE AS SHOWN BY THE ATTACHED PLAT.WHICH IS A CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF SAID SURVEY AND PLATING. ALL DISTANCES PALE COUNTY OF BROAD-) STATE OF ILLINOIS) HEREON IN FEET ANDD DECIMALS WITHIN EREO CITY LIMITS E D SHOWN MEASURED BEARINGS OF TRUE NORM RTH IFUERCERRFYNATMEPROPERIY )SS THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE RECORDER'S OFFICE OF KENDAL COUNTY, WNNS ON THIS DAY OF COUNTY OF KENDALL) ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST OR WILL BE PLACED WITHIN SIX MONTHS AFTER ME DATE OF APPROVAL BY ME 2013.AO. AT O'CLOCK_M.,AND RECORDED IN DOODLE 0 ASWCUMEWNO. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT RICHARD D. BAUER AS ENGINEER AND KENDALL CROSSING LLD.TOME BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE CITY COUNCIL, BUT PRIOR TO MY CONVEYANCE OF ME LAND DEPICTED HEREON AGE THAT THEIR LOCATION, SIZE,TYPE AND AND BELIEF,THE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATERS WILL NOT BE CHANGED BYTHE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH KENDALL CROSSING MATERIALSAREACCURAFELYSXOWN. PUD OR THAT IF SUCH SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE WILL BE CHANGED,REASONABLE PROVISIONSHINE BEEN MADE FOR I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOW HAZARD MEN AS SHOWN COUNTYRECORDER: DESBIEGILETTE COLLECTION AND DIVERSION OF SUCH SURFACE WATERS INTO PUBLIC AREAS WHICH THESUBDIVIDERHASARIGN TO USE. ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 17093000370 REVISED FEBRUAI ODMIAND MATALL REGULATORS ENACTED BYTHE AND THAT SUCH SURFACE WATERS WILL BE PLANNED FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLYACCEPIEO ENGINEERING UNITED CM OF YORKVILLE RELATIVE TO PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED NTH IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAT. PRACTICES SO AS TO REDUCE THE LIKELIHOOD OF DAMAGE TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY BECAUSE OF ME CONSTRUCTION OF KENDALL CROSSING PUG. DATED AT PLACID, ILLINOIS THIS DAY OF 2013 AD. DATED THIS DAY OF ,2013 AD. RONALD D.BAUER ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR#2352 RB & ASSOCIATES REGISTRATION EXPIRES 11-3 0.2 014 ENGINEER 06476 UP. 11 BAUER OWNERS: . BATCLMANAGR)LLC CONSULTING , INC LIL.#6I D64]69 EXP. ,,JB2B,3 JAMES G. RAT0.5(AIFNAGER) PAGE 4 OF 4 - Qe ® 4W MAIN STREET DESIGN FIRM# PLANO , IL 60545 184-004475 (1330) 552-7452 m"Jib-a5soclatesmel DWG #2012-14318-004 C (FINAL) Engineering Enterprises, Inc. February 8, 2013 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Kendall Crossing - Final Plat Review United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Dear Krysti: We are in receipt of the Final Plat received February 5, 2013 prepared by RB & Associates for the above referenced project. Our review of these plans is to generally determine their compliance with local ordinances and whether the improvements will conform to existing local systems and equipment. This review and our comments do not relieve the designer from his duties to conform to all required codes, regulations, and acceptable standards of engineering practice. Engineering Enterprises, Inc.'s review is not intended as an in-depth quality assurance review, we cannot and do not assume responsibility for design errors or omissions in the plans. As such, we offer the following comments: 1 . The following items need to added to the plat: • Per state statute, it is a requirement to state the basis of the bearings. • The building setback lines need to be labeled as such on all sheets. • Lot numbers need to be provided • A subdivision area table is required. • Adjacent street widths need to be dimensioned. • The west line of the lot with and acreage of 2.0769 needs to be dimensioned. • The south line of the subdivision with a bearing of N85°53'04'W needs to be dimensioned with a measured bearing and distance. • The Point of Commencement and the Point of Beginning need to be labeled. • Per Section 7.10.02 of Subdivision Control Ordinance, rear and side yard easements (5' min.) are required. • For the purpose of assigning addresses, we recommend proposed street names be provided. 2. The legal description needs to use measured distances and bearings in lieu of record distances and bearings. 3. The easements currently labeled as PUE need to be referenced as Public Utility and Drainage Easements (PU&DE). Wheeler . 60554 r 466-6700 r Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble February 8, 2013 Page 2 of 3 4. The minimum radius at right-of-way intersections is 25'. The plat currently shows 20' radii. 5. All dimensions are to be to the hundredth of a fool. Currently there are radii that are only to the nearest foot. 6. There are several existing and proposed utilities within the project limits; therefore: • All existing easements need to be shown and dimensioned on the plat. • An easement needs to be provided for any existing utility currently not within an easement. • All proposed utilities need to be placed in an easement with the exception of the privately owned and maintained storm sewer. In order to ensure that all utilities are properly located in an easement, we recommend an exhibit be provided showing all existing and proposed utilities and their respective easements. 7. The City's weather warning siren located within the Route 47 right-of-way at the southeast comer of the Kendall Crossing project limits will require relocation due to the Route 47 improvements. The City's desire is to relocate the siren immediately west onto the subject property and within the proposed 15' PU&DE. The siren should be included on the above referenced exhibit. S. The proposed easement encompassing the existing 48" storm sewer should be a minimum of 20' in width. 9. The proposed easements encompassing proposed water main should be a minimum of 15' in width. The easement should be not be centered on the water main itself, rather off-set (centerline of water main 5' off of easement limit). 10. If the perpetual easement (to cut and/or fill slopes) is no longer needed or benefitting the owners of the McDonalds Subdivision it should be extinguished by a separated document and removed from the plat. 11 . In regards to the area labeled "Reserved for Common Access", we offer the following: • Additionally label as a PU&DE to account for the proposed and existing utilities. • In order to clarify who will own, maintain and has rights to the common access area we recommend that the area be become a lot. • The proposed roads shown on the improvement plans as °Theater Road" and "Service Road" should be included in the above. • Access easement provisions need to be added to the plat. 12. An access agreement or easement will be required in order to ensure continual use of existing ingress/egress points by adjacent property owners which currently have access to the proposed "Common Access" area. 13. The correct certificates need to be used. The correct certificates will be forwarded to the surveyor. 14. The Engineer's/Owner's Certificate in not needed on the plat, rather it belongs on a Drainage Overlay. 15. Per section 6.03.02 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance, the plat will need to be submitted in digital format to the City on NAD27 Illinois State Plane, East Zone, US Foot (IL-E). G:\Public\Yorkville @012\Y01220.DR Kendall crossinti Dopy coy Final Plat Review 01.doc Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble February 6, 2013 Page 3 of 3 16. Upon completion of the Final Engineering plan review, additional comments regarding the plat may be warranted. The developer should provide the requested information and make the necessary revisions and submit two (2) sets of plats for further review. If you have any questions or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. � � Bradley P. S nderson, P.E. Vice President BPS/mgs/jam PC: Mr. Bart Olson, City Administrator Mr. Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Ms. Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation Ms. Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Mr. Dan Kramer Mr. Ron Bauer, RB & Associates JAM, JWF, EEI G:Wublic\Yorkville\2012\Y01220-DR Kendall Cro9sing\DOa11 coy Final Plat Review Otdoc Engineering Enterprises, Inc. November 20, 2012 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Kendall Crossing Preliminary and Final PUD Engineering Plan Review United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Dear Krysti: We are in receipt of the preliminary plat dated November 7, 2012, final engineering plans and final plat dated November 8, 2012 prepared by RB & Associates for the above referenced project. Our review of these plans is to generally determine their compliance with local ordinances and whether the improvements will conform to existing local systems and equipment. This review and our comments do not relieve the designer from his duties to conform to all required codes, regulations, and acceptable standards of engineering practice. Engineering Enterprises, Inc.'s review is not intended as an in-depth quality assurance review, we cannot and do not assume responsibility for design errors or omissions in the plans. As such, we offer the following comments: Preliminary Plat Review 1 . A legal description should be added to the first sheet of the plat. 2. A site data table should be added including the pertinent items noted in the PUD Ordinance. The parking stall dimensions should be provided in the site data table. 3. The lots should also depict building footprints and dimensioned setbacks. Information regarding purpose/use and height of buildings should also be provided. 4. The existing zoning and land use of adjacent property within 500' of all sides of the site should be noted. 5. There appears to be several existing easements within the proposed development. The text is illegible. The existing easements need to be depicted clearer. 6. The developer should provide comment on the intentions of the proposed easement that traverses through the middle of several lots. Proposed easements need to be clearly defined. 52 Wheeler Road, Sugar Grove, IL 60554 r 00 r 466-6701 fay — www.eeiweb.com Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble November 20, 2012 Page 2 of 3 7. Detailed topography of the intersections of the interior streets with Countryside and Center Parkway should be provided. 8. A better understanding of how the proposed development will maintain or not maintain access points with neighboring lots should be provided. 9. Existing water main should be shown. 10. Soil borings should be submitted for review. 11 . Any proposed loading areas should be identified on the plans. 12. It is unclear whether the sheets labeled Topographic Survey are a continuation of the preliminary plat. If so, there titles should be changed. 13. A preliminary engineering plan has not been submitted, rather the petitioner is moving immediately to final engineering. Final Enuineerina 14. A storm water management report needs to be submitted. 15. A traffic study needs to be submitted. 16. The plans are generally incomplete; therefore we are only able to offer a partial review. 17. The City's construction notes for water main construction and YBSD's notes for sanitary sewer construction need to be added to the plans. 18. Detailed proposed grading needs to be provided. 19. Lot lines and property lines need to be shown on the plan sheets. 20. Roadway widths need to be dimensioned. 21 . The amount of proposed storm sewer inlets within the parking areas appear to be inadequate. Please note that a maximum of six inches is allowed for ponding with a 10-year design storm. 22. Rims and inverts of existing and proposed utilities need to be shown. 23. The existing water main and sanitary sewer are in poor condition. The replacement of this infrastructure should be discussed. 24. All appropriate utility permit applications need to be submitted for review. 25. Appropriate details need to be added to the plans. 26. The final engineering plans need to be submitted to IDOT for review and comment. Any comments from IDOT should be provided to the City. Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble November 20, 2012 Page 3 of 3 27. The plans need to be submitted to YBSD for review. Please forward their comments to us upon receipt. 28. A clean version of the photometric plan needs to be submitted. The version that was provided is difficult to read. As required by City ordinance, a minimum average of 2.0 foot-candles, as measured across the entire parking lot and a maximum of 1 .0 foot-candles measured at the adjoining property lines must be met. 29. A cost estimate for the proposed improvements needs to be provided. 30. A proposed construction schedule needs to be provided. Final Plat Review 31 . The minimum font size should be 8 pt. Currently, numerous items are difficult to read. 32. The Public Utilities and City Collector's certificates should be removed. 33. The City Utility Easement provisions are incorrect and should be replaced with the Public Utility language. 34. The private utility easement provisions are shown on both sheets; one should be removed. 35. Building setback lines need to be shown. 36. Provisions for access easements need to be provided. 37. The widths of adjacent right-of-ways need to be shown. The developer should provide the requested information and make the necessary revisions and submit two (2) sets of plans for further review. If you have any questions or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. radley P. Sanderson, P.E. Vice President PC: Mr. Bart Olson, City Administrator Mr. Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Ms. Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation Ms. Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Mr. Dan Kramer Mr. Ron Bauer, RB & Associates JAM, JWF, EEI 1\MILKYWAY%EEI StoregelDowa Public\Yorkville\20121Y01220-DR Kendall CrossingZowM wy Review.dw RB & Associates Consulting, Inc. Land Surveying, Civil Engineering, GIS/Mapping, Database Management 4 W. Main Street - Suite 201 Plano IL 60545 February 12, 2013 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Re: Kendall Crossing—Final Plat Review Dear Krysti: Thank you for forwarding us the Final Plat Review comments provided by Bradley Sanderson of EEI. I am responding to the review comments as detailed with the letter. 1. The basis of Bearings used was stated in the Surveyors Certificate however I have also placed it on the plat, building set back line placements have been corrected, Lot Numbers and Lot Area Tables were turned back on also. The adjacent street widths have been completed;the missing dimension of lot 6 and the missing dimension along the south lot line along with the points of commencement and beginning placed on the plat. We have not added additional 5 foot easements along the common lot lines of Lots 2 and 3 or Lots 4 and 5. We already have PU &DE all the way around the lots with the utilities located within them. The owners do not want to place the additional easements not knowing if lots will be sold 2 at a time or what. Street names have been added as requested. 2. The rewording of the legal descriptions to using measured bearings and distances interferes with the proper chain of title to the land. Richard Bales, Council for Chicago Title and Trust has recommended against changing the legal description. 3. All easements have been modified from PUE to PU&DE allowing for drainage easements. 4. The subdivision ordinance may require a 25 foot radius at all intersections.. The existing radius for the curbs at the northwest and northeast corners of lots 4 and 5 are currently at 20 feet and therefore platted this to follow original subdivision. We originally increased the radius' along the north side of the proposed extension of W. Kendall Drive to allow for having substantially more traffic. 5. All necessary changes to dimensioning have been made. 6. Majority of the existing utilities are currently or will be located within the easements shown hereon. A few of the utilities are located within the recorded easements created with document No's 72-2582 and 73-1682. There is a separate note on the lower left corner of the plat on Page 3 of 4 in regards to said existing easements and utilities. 7. The City's weather warning siren could very easily be added to the overall plans. There appears to be room between the property line and the newly located underground electric. info(Wrb-associates.net 630.552.7452 g g rb-associates.net us-cemeteries.com 8. The proposed easement encompassing the existing 48" storm sewer has been revised to 20 feet in width. 9. Increasing the width of the proposed water main easement to 15 feet wide is a concern of the owners. This easement has already been placed so it would not interfere with the existing utilities,the proposed utilities and the location of the proposed theatre. 10. The perpetual easement benefiting McDonalds is a very good question and being referred to Attorney Dan Kramer for answers. It would beneficial to have it removed from the plat and not encroach onto Lot 1 but the easement is something that was recorded and platted with the original subdivision plat.Attorney Kramer is attempting to get the release of this easement in the purchase agreement of the half acre lot they are negotiating on. 11. Lot 7, labeled as "Reserved for Common Access" will have utilities located within the lot.We have added wording to the statement for Lot 7 being an Easement for Ingress and Egress and a Public Utility and Drainage Easement. 12. The existing Easement for Ingress and Egress for the adjacent property owners is still in existence and will remain in existence. Accessibility of the owners will not be interrupted because of this development. Attorney Kramer can also address this more in the easement agreements being drafted for the maintenance of the roads. 13. The certificates have been reworded to follow the standard certificates for the United City of Yorkville with the exception of the wording referring to dedication of the roads and right of ways. 14. The engineer's/Owner's Certificate has been removed and will be added to future drainage overlays. 15. Section 6.03.02 of the Subdivision Control Ordinance is requiring the plat be submitted in digital format on NAD27 Illinois State Plane, East Zone, US Foot datum. Is this possibly something that needs reviewing within the ordinance? Kendall County has all of their GIS System based on NAD83 Datum. The YBSD is also requiring all elevations to be on NAVD 88 Datum and the recently established Control Monuments created by EEI is uses NAD83 and NAVD88 for those controls. Lastly,the NGS Data Sheet for the area even includes a statement"NGS no longer adjusts projects to the NAD 27 or NGVD 29 datums". Please clarify what should be used. The use of NAD27 has been superceeded by some 29+years. I hope I have addressed all comments and questions to the satisfaction of the United City of Yorkville personnel. As I mentioned last week, I will not be able to attend the meeting on Wednesday February 13, 2013 because I will be in Springfield for the Illinois Surveyors Conference. If you have any questions, call my office and leave word for me and I will get back to you. I will be checking in for messages throughout the day. Thank you for your time and I look forward to continue working with you on this project. Your y �� Ronald D. Bauer PLS/Pres infoAub-associates.net 630.552.7452 gg" = rb-associates.net us-cemeteries.com cl�- 0 Memorandum EST. —� _ 1836 To: Plan Commission . � From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Q ® 0) CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Brad Sanderson, EEI, City Engineer KendA C.." <LE iw Date: December 7,2012 Subject: PC 2012-11 Kendall Crossing PUD—Preliminary&Final Plat Petitioner Request/Background: As the Plan Commission will recall, the Petitioner, James G. Ratos (Kendall Crossing LLC), was recently granted approval of a Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development(PUD)on the property for the Kendall Crossing development(formerly Countryside Center) located at the northwest quadrant of US 34 (Veterans Parkway) and 11 Route 47 (Bridge Street). The approved preliminary concept plan of the PUD consisted of six (6) lots, a new 38,500 square foot cinema complex with five (5) supplemental outlots,and subject to the following conditions: 1. The Developer must submit and obtain approval of Preliminary Plan or Final Plat for the Subject Property within one(1)year from the date of the ordinance approval. 2. Authorization to vary from the required off-street parking standards to permit parking stalls that are narrower in width than the minimum required 8.5 feet for 90 degree stalls and the Landscape Ordinance requirements to provide one (1) landscaped island for every 20 parking spaces, per staff's review and approval. 3. Authorization to vary from Section 10-11-4-B the number of required off-street parking stalls to provide 418 spaces rather than 662 spaces as required. 4. Authorization to vary from the required off-street loading requirements, to permit one (1) off- street loading dock for the theater,rather than the two(2)docks required. 5. Authorization to vary from the Subdivision Control Ordinance and stormwater management requirements, subject to review of final engineering plans and the recommendation(s) of the City Engineer. The Petitioner is now requesting recommendation for Preliminary and Final Plat approval from the Plan Commission. Proposed Preliminary Plat: The overall Kendall Crossing development has a total land area of approximately 17.74 acres resubdivided into seven (7) parcels. As illustrated on the attached Preliminary Plat for the Kendall Crossing PUD, Lot 1 of the resubdivided Countryside Center will cover approximately 7-acres and contain the 10-screen multiplex theater to be owned and operated by Neighborhood Cinema Group (NCG). According to the Petitioner, Lots 2-6 are intended for commercial development such as restaurants and other uses complimentary to the movie theater. Lot 7 will be dedicated for all internal roadways and access drives which will be privately maintained. A proposed new right-in/right-out access off of Route 47 is also proposed. Below is overall site information regarding the proposed Kendall Crossing PUD, as provided on the Preliminary Plat: Proposed Use Site Area Lot 1 Cinema Complex 7.0586 acres Lot 2 Commercial 1.1507 acres Lot 3 Commercial 1.0132 acres Lot 4 Commercial 1.8400 acres Lot 5 Commercial 1.7391 acres Lot 6 Commercial 2.0769 acres Lot 7 Common Drives 2.8632 acres TOTAL PROPERTY 17.7417 acres Parking The following parking information provided by the Petitioner on the site data table on page 3 of the Preliminary Plat: Parking Spaces Ordinance Requires 577 Regular 8.5'x20' Provided 402 Regular 8.5'x20' Ordinance Requires 12 Handicap 16'x20' Provided 9 Handicap 17'x20' Total Required 577 Spaces Total Provided 411 Spaces Utilities The property is currently serviced by public utilities, as there is existing water, storm sewer and sanitary sewer lines throughout the site. All other dry utilities, such as electrical, gas, cable and telephone are also available to the property. The Preliminary Plat illustrates all locations of all existing and proposed utilities as well as the associated public utility easements for the Kendall Crossing PUD. Roadways As mentioned previously, the internal roadway will be privately maintained. The Petitioner has proposed creating an Illinois Not-For-Profit Corporation known as Kendall Crossing Business Owner's Association,which will be primarily responsible for the common area maintenance which will establish a reserve fund dedicated for street maintenance, common area signage and landscaping. The Petitioner will execute a cross-access easement to be recorded with the Final Plat allowing all future owners of the various lots within the PUD to access the private roads. There is currently an existing cross-access agreement with the McDonalds restaurant to the south of Lot 1 which will be maintained. All access points connecting the private roadways with public streets (i.e., Countryside Parkway, Route 47 and Center Parkway) will remain unchanged with the exception of the proposed new right- in/right-out curb cut onto Route 47 just north of the movie theater parcel between Lot 1 and Lot 2. This proposed new east-west access point will require an Illinois Department of Transportation(IDOT)permit. Phased Development The Preliminary Plat indicates on page 3 that the Kendall Crossing PUD will occur in two (2) phases. Phase 1 will focus on the construction of the cinema complex (Lot 1), including the watermain, sanitary and storm sewers serving the area. Additional construction in this phase will also consist of installing the main parkway road, the parking and roadway surrounding the movie theater on the east and west sides of Lot 1 northerly towards Countryside Parkway and the new right-in/right-out access point onto Route 47. According to the Petitioner's "Statement of Planning Objective to Be Achieved" submitted with their application, they anticipate commencing construction of Phase 1 around January 15, 2013. The construction schedule for Phase 2 of the Kendall Crossing PUD will largely depend on the sale of the remaining parcels within the development (Lots 2-6). The individual site plans for these lots will be submitted for review and approval by staff and will occur as part of the building permit process. Staff Comments In addition to planning and various departmental staff, the proposed Preliminary Plat has also been reviewed by the City's engineering consultant, EEI, for compliance with the Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standards for Specification requirements. Those comments regarding the plans were provided to the Petitioner on November 20, 2012 (see attached). A letter from the Petitioner's Attorney dated November 27, 2012 and revised plans dated December 6, 2012 were provided to Staff in response to the engineering comments and are included as an attachment. EE1 also reviewed the attached Preliminary Plat submittal prepared by RB & Associates Consulting Inc. and provided supplemental comments in a letter dated December 7, 2012 (see attached). Below are additional planning staff comments: • An overall Preliminary Plat which fits onto a single page should be provided, and additional detail sheets(if needed)may be included. • The site data table included on the Preliminary Plat does not include all the detail as required by the PUD Ordinance (such as: total area of property in square feet and acreage; square footage and percent site covered with buildings on Lot 1; Gross Floor Area for the building on Lot 1, etc...) • Ord. 2012-40 authorized a variance from the required off-street parking regulations to provide 418 spaces rather than 662 spaces as required. The Preliminary Plat indicates on the site data table that the provided parking stalls have been reduced by seven(7)parking stalls to 411 spaces. While we note that although the Petitioner was granted a variance to allow a minimum parking stall width of 8 feet rather than the required 8.5 feet, the proposed Preliminary Plat indicates the parking stalls will meet the Parking Regulations minimum design size. However, the decrease in overall stalls from the approved Ordinance cannot be varied without amending the PUD. It should be noted that the required parking spaces per Section 10-11-4-B of the Zoning Ordinance is 662 spaces,not 577 spaces. • Further, the site data table indicates that Lot 1 will have only nine (9) of the required twelve (12) ADA parking stalls. ADA parking standards are federally and state mandated and locally enforced. • There are some discrepancies with the total acreage of the site on the Preliminary Plat (example: Page 3 indicates the Total Property= 17.7417 acres and the Site Date Table indicates Area Total = 17.74166 acres). • Page I of the Preliminary Plat the word "Memorial" of Nelson Memorial Services, PC is misspelled. • Page 3 of the Preliminary Plat in the development phase detail, "Countryside"is misspelled. Proposed Final Plat: The proposed Final Plat has been reviewed by the City's engineering consultant EEI, for compliance with the Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standards for Specification requirements. Those comments regarding the plans were provided to the Petitioner on November 20, 2012 (see attached). A letter from the Petitioner's Attorney dated November 27, 2012 and revised plans dated December 6,2012 were provided to Staff in response to the engineering comments and are included as an attachment. In general, Staff has expressed concern with the Petitioner and their design team that final engineering plans will need to be completed and reviewed before Final Plat approval can be recommended by staff. As details regarding the proposed utilities and approval from outside agencies (i.e., IDOT) are firmed up, the fine tuning and specific features of the site plan, including landscaping, cannot be committed to at this time in the form of a Final Plat. Staff Recommendations: Based upon the review of the Kendall Crossing Preliminary Plat and Final Plat, as well as the compliance with the City's PUD Ordinance, Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standards for Specification requirements, staff recommends approval of the requested Preliminary Plat subiect to comments by the City Engineer on a letter dated December 7, 2012 and staff comments provided in a memorandum dated December 7, 2012. Proposed Motion: In consideration of testimony presented during a Public Hearing on December 12, 2012 and discussions conducted at that meeting, the Plan Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request for Preliminary Plat approval for the Kendall Crossing PUD, as presented by the Petitioner in a site plan prepared by RB &Associates Consulting Inc. dated December 6, 2012, subject to review comments prepared by the City's Engineering Consultant, EEI, in a letter dated December 7, 2012 in addition to staff recommendations provided in a memorandum dated December 7, 2012 and further subject to rinsert any additional conditions of the Plan Commission)... Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner's Application w/attachments. 2. Kendall Crossing PUD—Preliminary Plat,prepared by RB &Associates Consulting Inc. dated December 6,2012. 3. Kendall Crossing PUD—Final Plat,prepared by RB &Associates Consulting Inc. 4. EEI Letter to the City dated November 20,2012 re: Kendall Crossing Preliminary and Final PUD Engineering Plan Review. 5. Daniel J.Kramer Letter to the City dated November 27,2012 re: Kendall Crossing Preliminary and Final PUD Engineering Plan Review. 6. COY letter to Petitioner Attorney,Daniel J.Kramer,dated November 30,2012 re:Kendall Crossing— Proposed Planned Unit Development(PUD)Plan&Final Plat Approval. 7. EEI Letter to the City dated December 7,2012 re: Kendall Crossing Preliminary and Final PUD Engineering Plan Review. 8. Copy of Public Notice. Engineering Enterprises, Inc. February 20, 2013 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Kendall Crossing- Final Plat Review United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Dear Krysti: We are in receipt of the Final Plat dated February 12, 2013 prepared by RB & Associates for the above referenced project. Our review of these plans is to generally determine their compliance with local ordinances and whether the improvements will conform to existing local systems and equipment. This review and our comments do not relieve the designer from his duties to conform to all required codes, regulations, and acceptable standards of engineering practice. Engineering Enterprises, Inc.'s review is not intended as an in-depth quality assurance review, we cannot and do not assume responsibility for design errors or omissions in the plans. As such, we offer the following comments: 1. The legal description needs to use measured distances and bearings in lieu of record distances and bearings per the subdivision code. 2. The width of Countryside Parkway and IL Route 47 needs to be shown on the plat. 3. All building setback lines need to be shown on the plat. There are a few still missing. 4. The easements located on lots 1, 5 and 6 currently labeled as PUE need to be referenced as Public Utility and Drainage Easements (PU&DE). 5. The legend noting the PUE needs to be updated. 6. The note "Record and Measured Table" in existing lot 1 needs to be removed. 7. All existing easements need to be shown and dimensioned on the plat. 8. The proposed easements encompassing proposed water main should be a minimum of 15' in width. The easement should not be centered on the water main itself, rather off-set (centerline of water main 5' off of easement limit). Road,52 Wheeler Sugar Grove, 60554 • 1 466-6700 • 1 466-6701 fax — www.eeiw'• • Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble February 20, 2013 Page 2 of 2 9. If the perpetual easement (to cut and/or fill slopes) is no longer needed or benefitting the owners of the McDonalds Subdivision it should be extinguished by a separated document and removed from the plat. We understand that the developer's attorney is reviewing this matter. 10. The developer's attorney should provide the City with copies of all existing and proposed access agreements with the neighboring properties. In addition, comments should be provided on proposed access for the roads shown on the improvement plans as "Theater Road" and "Service Road". 11. The plat will need to be submitted in digital format to the City on NAD83 Illinois State Plane, East Zone, US Foot (IL-E). 12. Upon completion of the Final Engineering plan review, additional comments regarding the plat may be warranted. The developer should provide the requested information and make the necessary revisions and submit two (2) sets of plats for further review. If you have any questions or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. __ _ Bradley P. Sanderson, P.E. Vice President BPS/mgs/jam PC: Mr. Bart Olson, City Administrator Mr. Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Ms. Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation Ms. Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Mr. Dan Kramer Mr. Ron Bauer, RB &Associates JAM, JWF, EEI \\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\2012\YO1220-DR Kendall Crossing\Docs\I coy Final Plat Review 02.doc February 13, 2013 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Kendall Crossing PUD Final Engineering Plan Review United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Dear Krysti: We are in receipt of the final engineering plans dated February 4, 2013 prepared by RB & Associates Consulting, Inc. for the above referenced project. Our review of these plans is to generally determine their compliance with local ordinances and whether the improvements will conform to existing local systems and equipment. This review and our comments do not relieve the designer from his duties to conform to all required codes, regulations, and acceptable standards of engineering practice. Engineering Enterprises, Inc.'s review is not intended as an in-depth quality assurance review, we cannot and do not assume responsibility for design errors or omissions in the plans. As such, we offer the following comments: General 1. The plans need to be submitted to the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District for review. Their comments should be provided to us upon receipt. 2. The plans need to be submitted to the IDOT for review. Their comments should be provided to us upon receipt. 3. Landscaping plans should be provided. 4. An IEPA watermain construction permit will be required prior to the start of watermain construction. Draft permits should be submitted for review. Road,52 Wheeler Sugar Grove, 60554 • 1 466-6700 • 1 466-6701 fax — www.eeiw'• • Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble February 13, 2013 Page 2 5. A cost estimate needs to provided, detailing both the private and public improvement costs. 6. A traffic control plan should be provided which details the temporary closure and control of the various entrances around the site during construction. In addition, the proposed permanent signage needs to be indicated. 7. The plans should include a lighting and photometric plan for lot 1 , 8. Final approval or sign-off from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources and Illinois Historical Preservation Agency should be provided upon receipt. Stormwater Management Report 9. Additional stormwater management facilities will not be required for the Kendall Crossing redevelopment as long as the runoff is not increased as a result of the redevelopment. Therefore, the original acreage of impervious surface constructed as part of the Countryside Center should be established to insure that the acreage of impervious surface is not exceeded when Kendall Crossing is fully redeveloped. 10. A plan sheet from the model should be provided which shows the pipe labels for ease of comparison between the plans and the design calculations. 11. It does not appear in the model output that any of the upstream flow is accounted for in the existing 48" storm sewer main that the proposed storm sewer pipes are tributary. In order to more closely predict the flow characteristics of the proposed systems, some reasonable assumptions may need to be made to approximate this tributary flow for use in the model. Sheet C-0101 (General Notes) 12. The City's water main construction notes need to added to the plans. They should replace the current notes. 13. The appropriate Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District specifications and construction notes need to be added. Sheets C-1301 to C-1304 (Geometry and Paving Plan) 14. The roadway pavement section hatch should be plotted behind the other layers to allow the other linework in the roadways to be seen and evaluated. 15. The Illinois Accessibility Code states that one accessible aisle is required for each accessible parking stall required. Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble February 13, 2013 Page 3 16. The differences between the descriptions of negative or reverse gutter should be explained or one term should be utilized if they are describing the same situation. 17. The locations of detectable warning panels should be shown. 18. The drive aisle widths in the parking lots should be labeled. 19. Additional detail needs to be provided regarding the screening, curb & gutter, and the rectangular pad east of the dumpster pad. Sheets C-1401 — 1408 (Road Plan and Profile) 20. In general, the design engineer should confirm the proposed roadway grades, including the need for vertical curves in some cases. It appears as though several locations may be flat, causing localized drainage issues. 21. The elevation at the intersection of Crossing Boulevard and Theater Road should be labeled in the Crossing Boulevard profile. 22. The cross section of Crossing Boulevard should be incorporated into the Theater Road profile. 23. The design engineer should confirm that the slope between stations 42+00 to 42+40 matches the proposed cross slope of Theater Road at station 16+73.92. 24. The sag at approximate station 49+30 should be labeled. 25. The design engineer should confirm that the low point at station 51+53.12 falls in the proposed depressed curb. Sheets C-1501-1504 (Grading Plan) 26. The localized sags within the parking lots should be evaluated as if the inlets on site were blocked to show that during a 100 year storm event a maximum of 0.5 feet of ponding occurs before either overtopping downstream or that there is not enough tributary flow for the maximum depth of 0.5 feet to be reached. Overland flow routes should be shown. 27. Additional spot elevations should be provided on all curb islands at corners, points of curvature, radii, depressed curb locations, and in line with high points and sags along the outer curb and/or centerline of back to back parking aisles. 28. More detailed grading and spot elevations need to be provided in the vicinity of the cross walk detailing the depressed curb locations, ramps/curb transitions, and slopes showing that the route meets the appropriate accessible guidelines. Gs:\Public!Yorkville120121Y01220-DR Kendall Grossing\Docs\lcoy Final Engineering Plans Review0l,doc Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble February 13, 2013 Page 4 29. Additional spot elevations and detail shall be provided along the connection to the existing Castle Bank, McDonald's and Shell facilities to show that additional drainage features are not required. 30. Additional spot elevations need to be provided along the large radius at the northeast corner where Theater Road and West Road meet to show that the proposed curb and gutter and roadway cross slope have adequate slope to drain properly. 31. Any transitions from positive to negative pitch curb and gutter should be labeled and include more detail on how the transition is supposed to occur. 32. The proposed contours on the east side of the proposed movie theater do not match up correctly with the contours of the service road. 33. Additional spot elevations need to be provided in the vicinity of the handicap spaces and accessible route to show that the proposed slopes do not exceed 2% in any direction. 34. Additional spot elevations should be provided in the vicinity of the northeast parking lot exit onto Crossing Boulevard showing the cross slope of the entrance and the slope of the Crossing Boulevard curb. 35. Additional detail should be provided at the northeast termini of the theater service road showing how the curb will outlet to inlet 103 and how the cross section of the road will transition from negative to positive. Sheets C-1601-1602 (Drainage Plan) 36. There are several locations in which the minimum horizontal separation between the storm sewer and the proposed water main are not met. 37. Pipe elevations and more detail should be called out at proposed utility crossing conflicts. 38. Storm Inlet 39 will require a special frame and grate because it is located in depressed curb and gutter. 39. The last structure before entering a storm sewer main shall be a catch basin with a two- foot sump. 40. The structure lid and type listed in description section of the structure table should be listed consistently in the same order to eliminate confusion. 41. The angle between the proposed 24" pipe and existing 48" pipe is too small to be constructed in an 8 foot diameter structure. The angle of the two pipes should be increased which will result in easier construction and a structure with greater stability and strength. The City's Standard Specifications for Improvements states that "the orientation G:1 Public\Yorkviile120121YO1220-DR Kendall CrossingTocs%lcoy Final Engineering Plans ReviewOl doc Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble February 13, 2013 Page 5 of sewers connecting to the manhole is such that there is at least 12" of precast wall between the openings provided for sewers". 42. The design engineer should add a callout requiring the contractor to plug all pipe openings in structures that are to have upstream pipes abandoned (examples — IN 21 and MH 23). 43. The 12" pipe between structures 112 and 105 appears to be over capacity during the 10 year storm event. 44. Please verify the rim elevations of structures 139 and 140. If they are correct, the cross slope of the roadway would be different than the typical section according to the elevation of the proposed profile. 45. The design engineer should consider shallowing up the slopes on storm laterals B-1 and B-2 to bring in the proposed 12" pipes above the existing 15" pipe due to the small angles between the pipes. 46. Additional information is needed regarding the future status of the pipe and structure west of storm manhole 09 and the storm sewer and pipes south of storm manhole 09. Sheets C-1701 to 1704 (Utility Plan) 47. The IEPA will require a profile of the watermain showing all conflicts for review as part of the construction permit application and review. 48. A 10' minimum separation between the storm sewer and water main is required per the IEPA. There are several instances in which this is violated. 49. The sequence of water main construction should be detailed on the plan sheet. 50. The proposed water main should utilize pressure connections to minimize shutting down the system and disrupting existing customers. We will provide details to be added to the plans to the design engineer. 51. The utility plan callouts should specify the water main pipe type, valve types, fitting types, and the use of mechanical joints (MJ) at all appropriate locations. 52. Callouts should be added detailing utility crossing conflicts. 53. Any valve vaults or hydrants to be removed shall be labeled appropriately on all utility plan sheets. G:iPubliclYorkville 120121YO1220-DR Kendall C;rossing\DoWicoy Final Engineering Plates Review01.doc Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble February 13, 2013 Page 6 54. The design engineer shall clarify the intention of the sanitary sewer approximately 15 feet south of the Crossing Boulevard from station 8+25 to 9+10. 55. Additional detail should be provided regarding the pipe type, necessary fittings and valve type that should be utilized on the 3" domestic water service stub. 56. The slope, size, pipe type, and inverts of the proposed sanitary service should be provided. The rim and invert of the sanitary manhole to be replaced should be provided. 57. A looped water main should be provided around the theater to prevent water quality issues that will most likely occur as a result of the theater service being located on a dead end main. 58. The proposed water main on Crossing Boulevard and north and west of the connection to North Road should consist of 12" pipe to match existing conditions. 59. Additional detail needs to be provided regarding the two new services located at station 3+00 of Crossing Boulevard. For example: where are the existing services located, what fittings/valves/appurtenances are required, what size is proposed, how will the connection and shut-down be handled. Sheets C-1801 to 1804 (Pavement Marking Plan) 60. The locations of all signage depicted on detail sheet C-5106 should be added to these sheets. 61. The location of all handicap parking stall fine signage should also be depicted on these sheets. Sheets C-5101 to 5103 (Details) 62. The title of detail C-5103-1 conflicts with the title shown in the Kieft brothers detail and should be revised. 63. Catch basin details should be added for the various sizes that may be required. 64. The following water main details shall be added to the plan set: pressure connection, valve vault, hydrant, thrust blocking, typical trench, water service connection, separation requirements. 65. Any necessary traffic control details should be added to this section of the plan set. 66. A detail should be added for concrete header walk that will be utilized along the handicap parking stalls. G:1 PubliclYoikville12012iYC1220-DR Kendall Crossing\Docsllcoy Final Engineering Plans Review0l Aoc Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble February 13, 2013 Page 7 67. Additional details should be added regarding the handicap parking stall striping and fine signage. The developer should provide the requested information and make the necessary revisions and submit two (2) sets of plans for further review. If you have any questions or if you require additional information, please contact our office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. Bradley P. Sanderson, P.E. Vice President BPS/jam/ktm PC: Mr. Bart Olson, City Administrator Mr. Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Ms. Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation Ms. Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Mr. Dan Kramer Mr. Rich Bauer, RB & Associates JAM, JWF, EEI G:I Publiic\Yoikville12012\YO1220-DR Kendall Crossing%Docs\lcoy Final Engineering Plans Review01.doc A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 440 Legal ❑ Mayor#3 Finance ■ EST. 1836 Engineer ■ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development : CC 2013-12 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ■ Parks and Recreation ■ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Proposed FY 2013-2014 Budget Meeting and Date: City Council—March 12, 2013 Synopsis: Discussion of proposed budget. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: The proposed budget can be found under the public hearing section of this packet.