The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet 2013 03-26-13 CI r� ,$ United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST. r7� - 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 o l�, Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 Kengail Gaury h<C E X1'�r AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 26, 2013 Call to Order: Pledge of Allegiance: Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV Carlo Colosimo Jackie Milschewski Marty Munns Rose Ann Spears Ken Koch Larry Kot Chris Funkhouser Diane Teeling Establishment of Quorum: Amendments to Agenda: Presentations: Public Hearings: 1. PC 2013-03 Veterans Way, LLC, Petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting a major amendment the Second Amendment to the Heartland Subdivision Annexation and Planned Unit Development dated January 11, 2005 related to the Heartland Business Center to permit the placement of an additional ten foot by sixteen foot (10'x16') sign with eleven(11)tenant sign panels within a driveway median of the subject property. The real property consists of approximately 5.1 acres of the common area located generally south of U.S. Route 34; west of McHugh Road; and north of Heartland Drive at 728 E. Veterans Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois. Citizen Comments on Agenda Items: Consent Agenda: 1. PW 2013-08 MFT General Maintenance Appropriation Resolution for FY 2014—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute 2. PW 2013-09 Heartland Commercial Center Sanitary Sewer Acceptance—accept the public improvements (sanitary sewer) as described in the Bill of Sale for ownership and maintenance by the City and authorize the waiver of the requirement for a performance guarantee equal to 10%of the value of the public improvements, subject to verification that the developer has no outstanding debt owed to the City for this project. 3. PW 2013-10 Resolution Approving a Revised Parkway Tree Program-—authorize Mayor and City Clerk to execute Minutes for Approval: Bills for Payment(Informational): $706,232.38 City Council Agenda March 26, 2013 Page 2 Mayor's Report: 1. CC 2013-16 Ordinance Extending the New Residential Construction Incentive Program by Amending Ordinance Number 2012-21 (B.U.I.L.D. Program) 2. CC 2013-18 Letter Opposing Cuts to Local Government Distributive Fund Revenues Public Works Committee Report: 1. PW 2013-11 Fox Hill and Sunflower SSA Mowing and Maintenance—Bid Award 2. PW 2013-06 Infrastructure Costs Economic Development Committee Report: Public Safety Committee Report: Administration Committee Report: 1. ADM 2013-12 Bond Refinancing—Library 2005B and Countryside TIF a. Authorization for Engagement Letter with Bernardi for Library Bond Refinancing 2. ADM 2013-16 Benefit Insurance Program Renewal—FY 14 Park Board: 1. CC 2013-19 Mower Trade-in and Purchase Plan Commission: 1. PC 2013-01 Ordinance Approving the Salek Subdivision of Lion's Pool Final Plat of Subdivision Zoning Board of Appeals: City Council Report: City Clerk's Report: City Treasurer's Report: Community and Liaison Report: Staff Report: Mayor's Report (cont'd): 3. CC 2013-12 Proposed FY 2013-2014 Budget Additional Business: Executive Session: Citizen Comments: Adjournment: City Council Agenda March 26, 2013 Page 3 COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -ADMINISTRATION: Apri1_18, 2013 —6:00-p.m.---City-Hall--Council Chambers Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Spears Finance Library Committee: Alderman Munns Administration Committee: Alderman Funkhouser Committee: Alderman Koch --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: April 2 2013_—_7:_OO__p.m7m�ityHall Council Chambers Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Munns Community Development Plan Commission Vice-Chairman: Alderman Teeling Building Safety and Zoning Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp. Committee: Alderman Milschewski Kendall Co. Plan Commission Committee: Alderman Colosimo ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- :PUBLIC SAMTX. Ap 14, 2013 —6:30 p.m.—City Hall Council Chambers. Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Colosimo Police Human Resource Comm. Vice-Chairman: Alderman Kot School District Committee: Alderman Spears Committee: Alderman Funkhouser ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TUBLIC WORKS: April 16,2013—6:00 p.m._—City_Hall Council-Chambers------------------- --------- ------------- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Teeling Public Works Park Board Vice-Chairman: Alderman Milschewski Engineering YBSD Committee: Alderman Kot Parks and Recreation Committee: Alderman Koch UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, March 26, 2013 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Hearings: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PC 2013-03 Second Amendment to the Heartland Subdivision Annexation and PUD related to the Heartland Business Center(Signage) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONSENT AGENDA: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2013-08 MFT General Maintenance Appropriation Resolution for FY 2014 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2013-09 Heartland Commercial Center Sanitary Sewer Acceptance ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2013-10 Resolution Approving a Revised Parkway Tree Program ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BILLS FOR PAYMENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Bills for Payment (Informational) ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR'S REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2013-16 Ordinance Extending the New Residential Construction Incentive Program (BUILD) ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CC 2013-18 Letter Opposing Cuts to Local Government Distributive Fund Revenues ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2013-11 Fox Hill and Sunflower SSA Mowing and Maintenance—Bid Award ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2013-06 Infrastructure Costs ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADM 2013-12 Bond Refinancing—Library 2005B and Countryside TIF a. Authorization for Engagement Letter with Bernardi for Library Bond Refinancing ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. ADM 2013-16 Benefit Insurance Program Renewal—FY 14 ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARK BOARD: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2013-19 Mower Trade-in and Purchase ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLAN COMMISSION: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PC 2013-19 Ordinance Approving the Salek Subdivision of Lion's Pool Final Plat of Subdivision ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPORTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR'S REPORT (cont'd): ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CC 2013-12 Proposed FY 2013-2014 Budget ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 040 Legal ❑ Public Hearing#1 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development PC 2013-03 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Heartland Center Subdivision PUD Amendment Meeting and Date: City Council/March 26, 2013 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 3/12/2013 Action Taken: Continuation of Public Hearing Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: The public hearing for the Heartland Center Subdivision PUD Amendment was continued to this City Council meeting at the request of the Petitioner. Since that time, the Petitioner has indicated they are ready to proceed. The attached staff memorandum summarizes the property background and petitioner's request for PUD Amendment for signage. •��`° crr� Memorandum J� 0 a "% To: City Council EST. 1836 From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director -�� CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator o �� Date: March 5, 2013 �dgC. •� Subject: PC 2013-03 Heartland Center Subdivision PUD Amendment <LE 728 E. Veterans Parkway Proposed Additional Monument Signage CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: The City has received an application from Veterans Way, LLC seeking an amendment to the Heartland Center Subdivision Planned Unit Development (PUD) to install an additional monument sign with tenant panels within the existing driveway median of the Heartland Center commercial retail property located off of E. Veterans Parkway(US Route 34). BACKGROUND &REQUEST: The applicant, Veterans Way, LLC (James Ratos), has recently taken ownership of Lot 7 within the Heartland Center commercial retail property and currently rents up to ten (10) tenant spaces including Mike & Denise Pizza, Fox Valley Uniforms, Thompson Chiropractors, Modern Dentistry, Pesola Media, Heartland Blood Center, Atlas Physical Therapy and Karate Extreme. The approximately 0.883-acre parcel, which has a strip center and various outlots, is zoned B-3 Service Business District and approved as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) in 2005 via Ordinance 2005-05 (see attached). The original Annexation and PUD Agreement for the development did not address specific signage criteria. Currently, the development has one (1) monument tenant sign for the entire retail center which is located on the lot of the newly constructed Dairy Queen restaurant. Per an executed Mutual and Reciprocal Sign Easement in 2012 between the owners of Dairy Queen, Chicago Title and Trust #3191, and the applicant (see attached), only 25% or the lower left half of the existing monument sign would be reserved for use by tenants of Lot 7. Therefore, the applicant is seeking to amend the Heartland Center Subdivision PUD agreement to permit the installation of an additional monument tenant sign off of Veterans Parkway within Lot 7 of the commercial retail development. According to the applicant, the additional sign is needed to provide adequate business identification and visibility for all of his tenants, as the retail strip where he is located is not immediately adjacent to the roadway. PROPOSED SIGNAGE: The proposed monopole-type sign would be located on private property within the driveway median of the entrance to Lot 7 off of Veterans Parkway (US Route 34) and perpendicular to the roadway, as illustrated on the attached sign plan. The sign also appears to be located within an existing ten foot(10')wide City public utility easement, as depicted on the Heartland Center Final Plat of Subdivision. The double-faced internally-illuminated sign is proposed to be twenty-four feet(24'-0")tall, clad in brick to complement the existing monument sign and building's fagade, and will be capped with stone. The sign area will consist of up to eleven (11) tenant panels and have a width of 10 feet and length of 16 feet for an overall area total 160 square feet. The sign face will be fabricated out of white acrylic with the copy applied to the surface , similar to that of the existing Heartland Center development sign. STAFF ANALYSIS: Although the proposed new sign does not conform to the Sign Ordinance criteria with regards to size, height or location, the intent of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to provide flexibility from the rigidity of the conventional zoning/bulk/signage regulations if there is a greater benefit to the property and the City as a whole. The applicant believes there is a greater benefit to not only his tenants,but the Heartland Center overall, to be permitted the additional sign as it will free up panel slots for the other businesses in the development not owned by the applicant to be advertised on the existing monument sign. The following table compares the proposed new sign and the existing sign with the current sign ordinance regulations: • Max. 32 square feet for lots less than three(3)acres 98.61 square feet 160 square feet • Max. 64 square feet for lots (11'-10"x 8'-4") (16'x 10') three(3)or more acres. Max. 8 feet or lessl 18 feet 8 inches Twenty-four(24)feet - ' 1 • Located at least 5' from any • Located within the • Located within a driveway and lot line. front yard approx. driveway island within a • Signs taller than thirty eleven feet(11')from public utility easement. inches(30")shall not be the lot line and more • Undetermined the located within that part of than five(5)feet from distance setback from the the yard or open area of a a driveway or drive northern property line. corner lot included within a aisle. • Not located within a line- triangular area twenty-five • Not located within a of-sight. feet(25')from the point of line-of-sight. intersection of two street right of way lines forming a corner(line-of-sight). Finally, the estimated distance between the existing monument sign and the proposed new sign is approximately seventy-five feet (75'). While the Sign Ordinance does not have a direct minimum distance requirement between permanent ground signs, in Section 8-11-9A, a minimum distance is implied; since lots three (3) acres or greater with street frontages in excess of 800' and entrances/exits at least 600' apart permitted to have a sign on each street frontage. STAFF COMMENTS: One item of importance to note, Staff was just made aware that although the applicant is the owner of a significant portion of the Heartland Center property, and particularly the lot where the proposed new sign will be installed; he is not the sole owner of the entire development. Therefore, authorization from the other two (2) property owners is needed on this request to move forward with an approval. Staff understands from the applicant's attorney,that full owner authorization is pending. Should the City Council concur that this request is beneficial for the overall development, suitable for the site and an appropriate amendment to the Heartland Center PUD, an ordinance will be drafted for the March 26th meeting for consideration. The applicant and his attorney will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to address the City Council and those present for the public hearing regarding this matter. ' Section 8-11-6-B defines Sign Height as computed as the distance from the grade of the centerline of the adjacent street to the top of the highest attached component of the sign. LAW OFFICES OF Daniel J. Kramer DANIEL J.KRAMER 1 107A SOUTH BRIDGE STREET KELLY A.HELLAND YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS 60560 D.J.KRAMER (630)553-9500 Fax: (630) 553-5764 �n V JAN 24 2U13 January 23, 2013 CUMMU1111y DEVE.UPMENT DEPARTMENT Krysti Barksdale-Noble United City of Yorkville Via Hand Delivery Re: Heartland Business Center PUT) Amendment Application for Sign Dear Ms. Barksdale-Noble: Enclosed please find the following documents for the Kendall Crossing Preliminary and Final Plat Applications: 1. 1 original PUT)Amendment Application and 40 copies 2. 1 check in the amount of$500.00 for Filing Fee 3. 1 check in the amount of$1,000.00 for engineering deposit 4. 1 disc with application Should you have any questions please let me know. Very trul ours, Daniel J. Kramer Attorney at Law DJK1cth Enclosures I United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 �9I�I o Telephone: 630-553-4350 1jy<<a;�Jr Fax: 630-553-7575 P p EMWED JAM 24 2013 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PC # APPLICATION & PETITION TO AMEND ANNEXATION or PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT Development Name: Heartland Center Date of Submission: 1. Name of Petitioner(s): Veterans Way, LLC 2GRRm Phone Number: Fax Email Address: Address: Relationship of Petitioner(s) to subject property. 11] Owner [] Developer [j Contract Purchaser 2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from #1: 46-1199174 Castle Bank Trust #2838 If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: Parkway, r.rr 3. a). Street address and physical location of subject property: 728 E. Veterans Parkway, Yorkville 15 b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit W. c). Total Acreage: -883 ( lot 7) & undivided 37 .6% interest in 5. 1 acre camrCn area d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of property: 02-28-253-011 & 02-28-253-012 e). Current Zoning Classification: B-3 PUD I). Zoning Classification Requested if changing zoning: Page 15 of 5 JaW City ofYorkvllle Amend AnnwtlonlPrlD Application Reviud: 21409 16 I 4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners entitled to notice of petition j under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: (Please attach a separate list as Exhibit "B".) 5. Date of Annexation or PUD Agreement sought to be amended: Name of Agreement: Second Amendment to Heartland Subdivision Annexation & PUD Date of Recording: 2/4/2005 Attach a true and correct copy of agreement as Exhibit "C'. 6. State the items to be amended from the existing annexation or PUD agreement. Amendment to permitted signage to allow Petitioner to place 10 ' by 16 ' sign with 11 tenant name locations in driveway median of subject property adjacent to Route 34 in the United City of Yorkville as Der the attached drawing Exhibit "D" 7. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: Daniel J . Kramer Attorney: Name: Daniel J. Kramer Address: 1107A S . Bridge Street , Yorkville IL 60560 Phone Number: 630-553-9500 Fax Number: 630-553-5764 Email Address: dame'@dankramerlaw. corn Engineer: Name: N/A Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: Land Planner: Name: N/A Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: li Page 16 of 5 United City of Yorkville Amend Annexation/PUD Application Revised: 9. 14.09 i 17 9. Submit the following to the Community Development Department in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies. b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to page 4 of this application 'Petitioner Route, Step 1, Fees and/or contact the Community Development Department for verification of this amount). c. Site Plan (if necessary): 40 sets folded to fit in a 10"x 13" envelope d. One CD containing PDFs of the signed application, exhibits and site plans, The legal description and amendment(draft)documents should be in word.doc format. In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is contiguous to the United City of Yorkville. Date: - trvvvwn 23jz_1_?L_ Petitioner(s)Signature: (All legal property owners of record signatures must appear on this application.) Vet s Wa , By: Jards G. Ratos, Manager Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of=, 203 Notary Seal THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. P MM EAL"MER OF ILLINOIS RES 412/2018 Page 17 of S United City of Yorkville Amend Annexation/PUD Application Revised: 9.14.09 18 AMENDMENTTO ANNEXATION OR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT PETITIONER ROUTE Step 1 : Petitioner must submit a completed application, fees' and all pertinent materials to the Community Development Department a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. Petitioner is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U. S, Army Corps of Engineers, etc. , to allow timely review by City. 'Fees: 1 . a. Annexation/PUD Amendment - $500 b Deposit for outside consultants - under 2 acres = $1 ,000 2 to 10 acres = $2,500 over 10 acres = $53000 Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). Should Owner/Developer not pay these fees directly; they will be responsible for reimbursing the United City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs. Note: You must present your plan at each of the meetings below as indicated. Step 2: Plan Commission : The Plan Commission meets the 2nd Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. at the Yorkville Public Library, 902 Game Farm Road. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Amendment to Annexation/PUD Agreement. For a public hearing, the petitioner shall complete and submit to the Community Development Department the application with a legal description 45 days prior to the public hearing at the Plan Commission meeting. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record at least 15 days but no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing date. Before this amendment can move forward to the Economic Development Committee, a "draft" Amendment to the Annexation or PUD Agreement must be written. Step 3: Economic Development Committee: The Economic Development Committee meets the first Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Economic Development meeting where no formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings and for review of the draft amended agreement. Step 4: City Council: Meetings are held the 2ntl and 4th Tuesdays of each month at 7 p. m, in the Council Chambers at City Hall. i A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Amendment to Annexation/PUD Agreement. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record at least 15 days but no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing date. A certified affidavit must be filed by the petitioner with the Community Development Department's office containing the names, addresses and permanent parcel numbers of all parties that were notified. Page 18 of 5 United City of Yorkville Amend Annexation/PUD Application Revised: 9. 14.09 i 19 Agreement: 1 understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred administrative and planning consultant fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return this original (retaining a copy for your records) to the Community Development Department, United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road , Yorkville, Illinois 60560. Signature of Petitioner �� t "° Date: j 1113 1-) i I Page 19 of 5 United City of Yorkville Amend Annexation/PUD Application Revised: 9.14.09 PARCEL 1 : LOT 7 AND AN UNDIVIDED 37 . 60 % INTEREST IN LOT 8 IN HEARTLAND CENTER RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 IN HEARTLAND CENTER SUBDIVISION UNIT 11 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED APRIL 8 , 2005 AS DOCUMENT 200500009772 , IN THE UNITED CITY OF OF YORKVILLE , KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS . PARCEL 2 : EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 , AS CREATED BY DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR HEARTLAND CENTER OWNERS ASSOCIATION FROM HOBSON HOLLOW , INC . AND CASTLE BANK AS TRUSTEE NOVEMBER 12 , 2003 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 2180 DATED APRIL 20 , 2005 AND RECORDED APRIL 21 , 2005 AS DOCUMENT 200500011270 , FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER , ACROSS AND THROUGH THE ACCESS ROAD DESIGNATED ON EXHIBITS B AND C , AND ALL PAVED AREAS IN THE DEVELOPMENT TRACT , EXCEPT (A) THOSE PAVED AREAS DESIGNATED FOR PARKING SPACES AND DRIVE THROUGH SERVICE LANES ON THE SITE PLANS ON FILE WITH THE BOARD AND ( B) EXCEPT AREAS MARKED OR DESIGNATED FOR PARKING ON LOT 8 . I, I I, PARCEL 3 : EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL 1 , AS CREATED BY DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR HEARTLAND CENTER OWNERS ASSOCIATION FROM HOBSON HOLLOW , INC . AND CASTLE BANK AS TRUSTEE NOVEMBER 12 , 2003 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 2180 DATED APRIL 20 , 2005 AND RECORDED APRIL 21 , 2005 AS DOCUMENT 200500011270 , FOR CUSTOMER PARKING OVER , ACROSS , AND ON THE PAVED AREAS DESIGNATED AS PARKING AREAS EXCEPT AREAS MARKED OR DESIGNATED FOR PARKING ON LOT 8 . I II Exhibit "A" i i I I i p Aumm sign CO.,Inc 2012 IGN CO `! 1 nSR4 I,i ANSLn+NO¢1 <- zi Heartland Center .KEw,Y.4 ® DOUBLE-FACED ILLUMINATED SIGN FABRICATE AND INSTALL SIGN OF ALUMINUM AND STEEL ANGLE. 24 ' 0 " FACE5 TO BE WHITE ACRYLIC WITH COPY APPLIED FIR5T 5URFACE. " ® EXP05ED METAL 5URFACE5 TO 5E COATED WITH ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE. INTERNAL ILLUMINATION TO 3E HIGH OUTPUT FLUORESCENT LAMPS. [IJ SCALE - 1142' = 1' tY W rt d ®® xnmmune ann< ��, , 51>F I .`"` as"'y e a""§" ri—N . . t 5ETJ10"X 21 STTEEL PTH CONCRETE FOOTING TO" STAGE 8" X 71' STEEL PIPE ON TOP. 51GN TO 5E PERPENDICULAR.TO Ii CONNECT TO ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED 5Y OTHERS PRIOR TO IN5TALL. MA50NKY DY OTHERS. 1100 Route 34 Prepared For: HEARTLAND CENTER Adi FT 34 0Mv 212571 eae 3 D<�s<B<a: 12/19/12 x<a: xP,6: Aurora, Illinois 60504 630 898 5900 office Loction Nai City/sham 630 898 6091 fa I YORKVILLE, IL x<.z xr s: are: NOTE THIN DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF AURORA SIGN CO. IT IS NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, COPIEO. OREXHIBITED IN ANY FASHION WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT FROM AURORA SIGN CO. CHARGES OF UP TO$2000.00 WILL BE ASSESSED FOR ANY MIS-USE OF THESE DRAWINGS. FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION OF , NS ALLOWS ONAMEND COSS ONCE NO HEARTLAND CENTER SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 ° °0N"w6 W D 6 OR x. vworts GGAreTE INaucx,s .- opt ONES 1_ _ PAC PODLK S,a1 PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTOR 20, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH RANGE LONG OE usEUExrs p.0 6 otJ g J, EAST OF ME THIRD PRINCIPAL MEA DIAN, IN ORISTP_ TOWNSHIP, W ' 1} Art N MORES) ExEt I_J Nncn,E w '6.y7$ EPERYME OFNCnlE4 O KENDALL CWNTY, ILLINOIS a ^ \ Y lnaa- t m PIGS TO HIGHWAY E VAT OF BEAR i i Or NNFD [x LO°CA=10 ha[PRAl R CACEM. / �. r NET AREA OF L015 1,2 AND 3^ 10.492 PICTURES \ \ WHO 705 CUBA ccCU TO w:° SLnS"m'E6n a P°EPCCaaom UPS. Ga. FOR E PIT ypP1Gx x, °c \]` ° m , AIM LOT x N0 LOT x TO A Mok o zE �\ 1 0 . Ej Bier \ix�., L0r E ��T "Nm�OF AR GO PHASE W, �Fi6-� Z c oLOnai cN n-1;:yoo //I \ N TOY °feu y'� PASS <o EARN wavAwT s xo®r aFmr+m wmmI ryp \ po 'yf]p 'J- W1N�4' \ ROCHE OF WAY wvmKATED BY NmW NOS SCALE NNSO CENSEWI E �� p . / \ OY OF a\ 0 Ra / CO < _ S I" AS THE E c V \ � '�. •. \ k \x2 � \ \ mE1AHEAVIVerowncES wnwv y' aYQ j� ?`� $a /\� \'dy \ \ ties _ "w.�' zSey T\� WHY AN AY Au II a°>qyh /r �!a ° �C \ *e2s> T 1 \ \ mm � ✓% � \ \'J �HEaBY SARNIA' \ \ ' 00"0Q' C P.V. 0AT 'E/� jIEPEdr RAinNmS �/ \ E �/ r d �`.C_sY. \'s \ Orcy°, N 9v9'sfi'F\ AD-53<1 B']6" wIP�� / j y /aY S/nom\:L:\ 0 1 Y3G[ \\ \ \ / 1H. LC �6 ..�,eYOa'e aEn�P AT 29.02' �ti'C° /tl OE / / // \ p6 YOw. `E Bu,E O[ aWO6 ISZ r / C,H /IFREDV 4UFC➢ / \ \ RE<NS[d'[opi cp01. AS MONTH LL C ARRAW AN CLAPS / / DIGS pI NIFYTHE. UCEsS PuO:EZSpmt LM9 0 �2V au U: LOT 2 / \ql a �� I wPY ,1NAT ' "."".��.:oia° s� i6IMwY�:D w< FDL0WN4 aOx�ACpq \4 .�Yq / H Lo ;, . I BANAANASATFmu FEPnfm {/�/ kL$O,C. B SI I . O M12I Pg`v \ v-3O` POINT OF PART AT THE N [EFT F SU III 31MENNEWS A, DO IF MAE �u.•mJ N a Btlp IT y Cxn�Eieo \ °S a/S�[`35` /�/ \ \ o '!sC AN' EELwxw4 / "ESO a�o[w NETWORK"OUNCROETC,SPy EWER OOMMAGAT s`E% /\ Afn^ AYT^ 1 1 Acro THEREOF iiA• 11G/G REG / / \ �0 9w � wiT39 P/hR FB 2LP < A`y \. / / I ECM H LACCE HE DISTANCE OF INCONTINENCE NORTH 40 ALI 11 A CERAMIC 5 AY nAx xO. DESCRIBED Ok(kAVA 70 p `THE O x o MY M SCHULHOF COM Or UX CHAT 34, ON CONE E Y6n Laq SHOALS AN PHOTO 00 SECONDS WAIT AN AMI DISTANAT A 3 A- D B� MGM OF w H WEST, A US 70 Do ACT TO A PONT HOW THE EASTERLY LAG OF NoWbot ROAD / LACE)8 I Au L MODICATED OF KAT OF 17°� Exe : iRso HE s LOT � s 5$ n 1i� o LEANED TOUCH IF DEMNU TIC I _ 11 R x - G ([�S. „ONCE Sot M SIGN N s IJSJ [ \\ \ Sr' \'+ Y`/ /` TO THE RISKY PART: EDGED EEEe SU GENLAC 5 2639.49' REC n � \ �qT° / / READING Sw,X 30 ORGANIC oIw wEZr Ax , 106 M12 REC .D. I pT \ gj, \wf` IS p D a BE V. / CLAIMING OF 176 HE FE ARSE NRVATME' onxEED \1 4P' /r v. w \ b. .\ SEE JET.e -4' S�a.w // e`"QNO v % c :°nnw SAM us-EmE E xcxoxa"n°cwH maE: .41910 1 ,C \ OIDNAC OYi 0 iiX[PSE7 wS WAST. An AMC FEW j z19 z:a E \ \ .a pa'E ti,{+/ o / °°.`" / /\ �°;rATED BY PLAT OF SAO HEARTLAAND A HAD RKINCEaw TT 1, TH • N /Q� / N6B2:Sfi El a9X \ T E w% Nj0•Ny / , \ SOUTH q DAEMON ix ¢xviCS Z[ SECONDS EAST /q s.6 w \ \ s+% /'�`1v P,v. c of / e` .4 / °E. A LY CNC OAF ,"''TAF�T� TCEASE 10 THERPONT HOURSxl A. 126.00 ftEC� % \ ./q / 6 / / N MET, Omwmx0 x me"o DISTANCE OF[°R[p[i4",E R. SJ0.00' REQ Al �l / LOT S ry a � � \ ID_ I 4CNT' . e N _ O \CHO. LRG.e \ / 145 `Mm \ \ SMGA2M LA'L / pG / SOUTHOEEGREESF11 MKTU ItiOG=* CASNLVNG AND A 5\}6��C5'S5' W REcC. a9.e]B 4 efi.,T' >/ y P -6B T,A nSTAxC¢ ICI Am 39.p9:REC. / � SIDEWALK NWTObE'N' ,Tp 1565' / .'PO /F �\ F OOOLFEETESUOTEX°AO ALCNOFO DEAPNO SM1MI DEUE Rv y5.00' I Z/ \ / S REB Y% D' O E. ^ / b C wwres n MMADS CAST. AN ARC ONSTAMAE OF %n FEET TO HEREBY LflN1T9 HEREBY LRAIRC L S3911 DUST / CHO. BRG.e 6 a. / P V OWNED CLBVATUR AM DIE WESTERLY LNEVOR HVn6TLAND W, 5 01.24]6" WIT REC \ A pV ALOING TSAM WITTIVLLY LED - HT 2m[ \ �zwEeY' OPPMffO �H D 6flG• / / �/\ t6,x \ PI W FARES A 11I OF XDCO PERT, AB,EWIf. A CHICAGO ° ',Hod"C / \ \ DECREES OB xvwTES xa 6RCWN6 EA4L, AS AMC Chi S \ 53996'41'W 'H' 0 3 UP A / /' / TG FIAT TO A POW OF KNOW COMATWfi THECA WRm \�L \ 00.62' / ¢ „7 / V \ AO WEE,w`V Lw: OEwC g A CFM CWAE NA TO LEE A "HEAR OF 507.00 to. ^ ' Aa_ f A'E'p \ ' G X / i / JIM Q,ivRW vIX� w ,n . i. Nmi. ALSO FORD n¢ RAW o[ REGmwtl. n rtEXDF TOM ///--- °pc CEGIf\1 l ° IRE' P.v. t of _ - _ u oiiuR Laao PORTLAND a TO TIE SGATHI COINER ON Lot 71 A SAID \I \ ODIC TO RUN wAxiE=\ / / !'3' L DIRECTION TTOCIADIANA USE 'OF THE C IoMI INC \7 \ pax OF m z�' -( / A, Oa v ILLINOIS.� n / U o u�'i1v1s" w ,,,Y sj1D `i / \\ \ -"` r 1 STRICTLY '^ /^ 21, PV. D.E. / "aT¢NR N STANDARDS TO A GOODMAN MEAN A 74.14' REC. jN_ EBY WmwVIED/ __ \\ :;, \ \ I TH THER CMI THAT THE PROPERTY SHOWN °X-a Y AI HERE R- Sw..- REC \\ ACTMOOVr.,Nx HEAMC ONE-HALF v LAN WHO WHOM / CHO.SRG.= I \ / MOON nSEEO n c Ns AREASsSJw�ro 5 SJ'OB'05' E REC. �/ Om£D BY D1V5ax 12 OF ARTICLE n OF THE SAM / ' \ \ ,JN \\ \ LEGEND SPECIAL ROOM ox ALGERIA DREATFeAw6EYT THE FICAPPAt"Kati MAP/r WISHED .P ,1A L pwrz \\ SUMM90N SOUNBAAY I/ S 30339]' E REC. \ \ / \ „a A-1168.9]' REC. \\ _ EX18IING LOT LINE D:Y�ER UNDER NY HAND A'N4SEAL IRS .m DAT OF NUMERSHED 179341 MEMO C 99 0.v 4 ` CA 333,00' REC. = LOT UN LINE ° u \ p9 1 CND 33.0 N B4'p6'N" E REC LOT LINE 9 A. 3a.J1' REC. \ EASEMENT LINE {jwynlsc f /xwt6�E✓ 5 / / qe 35.00' 0.EC \ —_ — BUIIDING SEIfl4CK LINE (— 1 b°q D ERGTA S 7739.2 E REC. — A.O.W. LINE PUT. NICE NAM7,10F FLOWN SHOPLATCAD Pav ", �m w¢ wm<n1w HEMMAND CENTER SUEDMSIDN UNff 1 ROAKE ANO ASSOCIATES, INC. RICHARD MARKER ASSOCIATES, INC. RnEEFU 654 HEAE IAND DRNE M :Jp3 DNAL, PORT OF SU90MSION NONZLUNTHVA ENGINEERS 1TIRKVIUE. ILuNOIS 66560 DONAMO r:NS/ww/ua1 Rte \WU\CDNMPZ6 M^ U\I <eaol aw-02arz BHO PAX HOMO) BaW-arzaT (530) 553-3322 rue INNER m/J0/m 31 J.Oa Filed for Recol^r1 in J(L- Nif )I GOLAN11'y, ( LL 1. NO .( f; STATE OF ILLINOIS ) tut AND RSON vY.-•U/t-c0U5 R't 01 19 Clm, ss II], ofIdIINCG c8, 00 COUNTY OFKENDALL ) , l i ORDINANCE NO. 200 — ( 7 ,> ' i AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A SECOND AMENDMENT TO HEARTLAND SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, Kendall County, Illinois, that a certain Second Amendment to Annexation and Planned Unit Development i Agreement permitting the subdivision of Lot 3 in Heartland Center Unit I of the real property i previously annexed to the United City of Yorkville in accordance with the Plat of Subdivision attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, said Second Amendment to Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement has been drafted and has been considered by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the legal owners of record of the territory which is the subject of said Agreement are ready, willing and able to enter into said Agreement and to perform the obligations as required hereunder; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS : l Section 1 : That the Mayor and City Clerk are herewith authorized and directed to execute, —1— on behalf of the City, a Second Amendment to Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement permitting the subdivision of Lot 3 in Heartland Center Unit I of the real property previously annexed to the United City of Yorkville in accordance with the Plat of Subdivision attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A", a copy of the Second Amendment to Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement is attached hereto and i made apart hereof. Section 2: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. I WANDA OHARE I JOSEPH BESCO VALERIE BURD PAUL JAMES _ LARRY KOT = MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS _ RICHARD STICKA APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of j , A.D. 20C� MAYOR PASSED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of I J (. 7_ , ;` A.D. 201 Attest. r�"r It CITY CLERL� i i Prepared by: Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge St. Yorkville, IL 60560 630.553 .9500 I Ii I � I I i I ! i I I I —3— STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )ss. COUNTY OF KENDALL ) li SECOND AMENDMENT TO HEARTLAND SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, HOBSON HOLLOW, INC., an Illinois Corporation is the OWNER of certain real property within the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois commonly,., known as "HEARTLAND SUBDIVISION'; and WHEREAS, RICHARD MARKER ASSOCIATES, INC„ an Illinois Corporation, is the DEVELOPER of certain real property within the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois commonly known as "HEARTLAND SUBDIVISION'; and WHEREAS, HOBSON HOLLOW, INC., an Illinois Corporation and RICHARD MARKER ASSOCIATES, INC., an Illinois Corporation are herein after collectively referred to as Petitioner; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner requests an amendment to the Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement executed on December 29, 1999 to permit the subdivision of Lot 3 in Heartland Center Unit 1 of the real property annexed to the United City of Yorkville in accordance with the Plat of Subdivision attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, a hearing was held before the Plan Commission of the United City of Yorkville and it was unanimously recommended to the City Council to approve the requested —1 — i I change in the Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement, and further that this Second Amendment to Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement shall only affect the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A'; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held at the City Council of the United City of Yorkville as required by Illinois Compiled Statues: NOW THEREFORE, upon motion duly made, seconded, and approved by a majority of those voting, the following Second Amendment is made to the Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement of Heartland Subdivision entered into by and between the United City of Yorkville and the OWNER/DEVELOPER of the subject property as follows: 1) INCORPORATION OF RECITALS: All part ies hereto agree that the above contained recitals are an integral part of this Agreement and hereby adopt those recitals as part of this Agreement. 2) AUTHORIZATION OF AMENDMENT: OWNER/DEVELOPER warrant that the parties hereto have full and express authority to enter into an Amendment of the original Planned Unit Development Agreement to which this Amendment is appended pursuant to that Agreement. 3) That upon approval of this Second Amendment to Planned Unit Development Agreement OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be permitted to subdivide Lot 3 in Heartland Center Unit 1 in I accordance with Exhibit "A", 4) The various parts, sections, and clauses of this Agreement are hereby declared to be severable. If any part, sentence, paragraph, section, or clause is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be —2— i affected thereby. 5) Any prior Agreement between the parties or parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of this Agreement are null and void as to the extent of such conflict. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect from and after its execution, passage and approval as provided by law. i i i i —3— DEVELOPER: RICHARD MARKER ASSOCIATES, INC., an Illinois Corporation By: _ O . Attest: — DATED : ISL I I �I I —4— I, OWNER: HOBSON HOLLOW, INC., an Illinois/CJ or�poration By: � IG� •u(� Si Attest. a �G Q ' Se-e" 2- DATED: /Yo c I I� I , i i I i —5— i UNITED CITY OF YORKVJI LE , > MAYOR ATTEST: '� �'(� ( �C I )l �� - '� -Z i � ( � P -fir ��r „ . .�• q •. ITY CLERK ? o , <� „ DATED: I I � i Prepared by & Return to : Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 630.553.9500 —6- I Heartland Center - Lot 3 Legal Description: Part of the East half of Section 28, Township 37 North Range 7, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in the United City of Yorkville, Bristol Township, Kendall County, Illinois Net area of Lot 3 = 8.409 acres I i I i i i i I VIII FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION g� HEARTLAND CENTER RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 IN UNIT 1 TIFF =s Q. �+' , IRf N MC GS, XNf CO' Srnw $ robAIIP 57 wORTi MXK ,a wnudn. h q,y ' 7. e,sr or ra T MNW#TL uuioux, aws% 1CMIOIP. s EtiMl CWxR. iWXgS �+� gwe,(e[ wauwri XCT MS. M IDR - W A16.T �iafe65 o<��ww,nm+• 4 s. ,.t a'I�.. , ' r i A ' LOOZOLOPFUT TO 'flK / °S„T q �S�E . '• `O'. � � ° —sr e � s wm,+.omOF, TWO on or R,coca . .,., . ,.n . %. '' a " TOkO,. T Ip,,0 \ / / tee, /' \^\.�°.n . as wh aoeT.le ° r0,. ° •/ , . nn . . AT IF 536']YT , ., w.Ay..P4�y�, • \ �T.qo ba LOT 6 j LIZ f \�\y-y)- Env .m"cir.,�, ^ ,^"� LOT 6 �. p,Y: , o / ��., 'ul-- YI mr'COM OF 44 TIT, LIT �I y/l +• .\ s, TI,i „ LOT 5 [ LFITOI ,F ITT, ' �TVl 00 •"Pq �. % w\. ITT IL' IT ILL. oT �a� LDT 4 y :i d`�e°!/TILT y 11. h '\ �• '. n. his; It I,.�I,Sws t ,�ITT, liv&w In ..••� `•\ • vrt.van11 S. A: u2Y FOOD i t9 / • � / /. •.\� `•\ mxmrs au=N w TT[, m ttaaST w.TC„ a'.".- ' ' �-•� r q �` : LOT 3 e;3. @L":. � 0„l3 NOO ^�,/\ ,g\ _i�� 490. le.,, w,mi• s°.r: � ' n� �/ \rv� <o,.,...,.ou O.IT Lt.f _LL' L`6 F'. 1,1 FILL., 1� IFFOLIFIL OIO�fQF� I)COLLOTO M W W TITTLE .111 AFFLATI, AYINMI ,L I”IF,FILM"Fro a vocILY omaLeffm FIT 'K AF IV ' % A' . IF S4100 vx i �`i O / � `. ,. li�Rw-P .art mOwIGN caD F,;u,T w2 .< a"'°",eR44 „„ � e / b •fie '� � — seorrswx Smmmzr w ICI '�\ .A( < M:T.» ` i� ,,. FILL acI _— cunwc wr uvc „< ,.wm.OFF w a, ''1 ..n3FT .x CWT F: 1w1 . a __ � _ _ __ awe 0 IT 0 5 goAKE Arv0 ASSaraATES, INC. p(;y}pp LL1Q1(ER 4550daTE5 INC NFMfWN OEIQfEN R DWIIIISION flF LOT 0 IN VN I a ev' 65t ,YA9fiµ0 PP,E iirvi PUi CF SIBOM510.q :DRM4F IWxOb W560 o. ,o°->a: . e.w IXeq eoe-„o, ZOOLITO wq, ... .m w �onwA f Or 2 FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION MIMI HEARTLAND CENTER RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 IN UNIT 1 PART H rR I $ sr axa ammau \ / - .�iLAt S6 THE i D ML'IHAN. JN E O la" m M wrvi ,Y O NET AKAwn - a. . $ 73u " % e^ j w u ri °> If Aft r Pala: A�j °. tore LOT 2 ow .\ a ".? l4°:� .3"6... W, . _. tme \ I, � / Am AkI III DUO If If \4 " ` YnMe`u'"' M,.;.•"./ / :r " ao"Cs zcs9-. LOT `c pppp Iola MI 7 s At MI 11 'Mal J O / i�• i ^ qt & t LOT'S / .r.....'m. �mAes.v„lI mot mw 11 III,AkAI m.� „ f/ e' gy`LOOT leavam let a 41 .1 11 .ssN IT o >/// .. ./F .\ aw IS �' LOT 3 °'b2 °shy os�' \ / ...o�«ooe ate."., .,o oH,w. .K.or. \ i " ga<\�fp1 �� "S '.� $9 �,,,w.x• '" ,y ' Np � `\ \ "` .a".,.....N� ...s. ..".a "< ...m..... g All CT; -�'� ,� ems/ am p6 /' \ snmrvsnn cauroMr ....".",.® .,,,..< MC«» ,� "1.M ."".w. .",.. CAR PAPHALt of " _ Nro. cwnw mt lmt Mm.au..>. � "� / % �"\y\ T e uc \1 \ w x umY. r'«c CENTS? UM `^\i Am l4,1M si \\�� `..2t \\ " I / / R. 15DWAM sm.m \ \ r Fn91¢M Lif m"or UK [ faOS\KE Afk V !ASSOCIATES, wc. RIONR0 NNZKER ASSaK INC. HFfRilPNO CFMER RFSl18DM40N OF LOT } IN UNIT 1 'e rc 65t M/AIW.D pEK Talk PlAr Cf Nddu9CN I'm o` N YfMXYR1E UUI NI m O mo-oaa . •.x tavi Nec-"ae" (eb) 553-JJ$3 m: H¢/m M G7 ' vm w. Z ®s,.ui.v9n m..Ixmlz SIGN CQ 10 ' O '. across, 11 Heartland Center f DOUBLE-FACED ILLUMINATED SIGN FABRICATE AND INSTALL SIGN OF ALUMINUM AND STEEL ANGLE. 24101. FACES TO BE WHITE ACRYLIC WITH COPY APPLIED FIRST SURFACE. MEMEL EXPOSED METAL SURFACES TO BE COATED WITH ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE. INTERNAL ILLUMINATION TO BE HIGH OUTPUT FLUORESCENT LAMPS. SCALE - II l' ANY 1' F IN5TALLATION IN5TRUCTION5 SET 10' X 21' STEEL PIPE IN CONCRETE FOOTING TO DEPRI OF 6'. STAGE &' X 11' 5TEEL PIPE ON TOP. SIGN TO BE PERPENOIODUR TO KT 54. CONNECT TO ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO BE PRO✓MED BY OTHERS PRIOR TO INSTALL. MASONRY BYO ER5. I IN Route 58 r' sm" HEARTLAND CENTER Fashion Rf °v4 °^02175'!1 3 o'm 12/19/12 "m Aurora. Illinois WW4 CID 898 5900 office wrim"c OW e98 W l fa. YORKVILLE. IL Me NOTE ixie YMYmw 4"a rRWEAry as"FOY a CO, 161PTO YaVROYlCF0.t�.OR OIMtO M Wr PJW4011 tlVfMMp MMg1 rg Ar iY40. aWMBawNWMYnLl IN WYYWIW OF Trials Y IMP 34 E Veterans IND erk 1. =f g r 0 ` � F ys � _ Heartland Dr United City of Yorkville G/S The Data is provided without warranty or any representation of y accuracy,timeliness,or completeness.It is the responsibility of the Parcel Data and Aerial Photography "Requester"to determine accuracy,timeliness,completeness,and W `d Provided By Kendall County G/S appropriateness of its use. The United City of Yorkville makes no warranties,expressed or implied,to the use of the Data. S I i I STATE OF ILLINOIS ) COUNTY OF KENDALL } I i MUTUAL AND RECIPROCAL SIGN EASEMENT BY AND BETWEEN ANIRI, LLC AND HEARTLAND CENTER OWNERS OF RECORD N OW COMES ANIRI> LLC as Owner of the Real Property described in Exhibit "A", and the Owners of Record of the Real Property described in Exhibit "B" who hereby agree to the Mutual and Reciprocal Sign Easement as contained herein in consideration of the Mutual i i Covenants between each party hereto % j Section 1 Grant of Easement ANIRI, LLC hereby grants a Mutual and Reciprocal Sign Easement for the use of the percentage of the sign face on the sign located on the Real Property described in Exhibit "A solely for on-site advertising for the businesses conducted by the Owners of Record described in Exhibit "B ". Section 2 Reservation of Signage Space and Use GRANTOR, ANIRI, LLC hereby reserves the use of 50% at the top of said sign located on the Real Property described in Exhibit "A" for the operation of its Dairy Queen. Business and any related business developed on said lot owned by GRANTOR. At no time shall any GRANTEE of this Mutual and Reciprocal Easement have a right to use any percentage of the signed face that is in excess of the percentage of use set out in the attached Exhibit " C" 1 i Section 3 Grant of License GRANTOR hereby grants a license for any GRANTEE hereunder to install at the expense of said GRANTEE their name and image on their percentage use of signage. Said license shall include the right for agents or employees of the GRANTEE to come onto the premises of GRANTOR solely and exclusively for sign maintenance and repair. GRANTOR reserves the right to move the location of the existing center sign located on its real property in the event the same does not conform to the overall development plan of GRANTOR with the Untied City of Yorkville or as requested by Dairy Queen as the Franchisor ofGRANTOR. Section 4 Maintenance Costs GRANTOR and GRANTEES shall mutually reciprocally be responsible for payment of electrical service, sign maintenance maintenance and repair costs, including any annual insurance charged to maintain said sign in direct proportion to the percentage of sign use used by GRANTOR and GRANTEE. Section 5 Duration of Sign Agreement This License and Lease shall continue until such time as there is any legal requirement for removal of said sign or so long as the parties hereto are in need of maintenance of the common sign for their business usage. No modification of said sign in terms of percentage of use or size shall be permitted unless approved by the United City of Yorkville and GRANTOR. 2 Section 6 Indemnification of Grantor GRANTEES and their successors and assigns hereby indemnify from any claim or liability the GRANTOR for property damage or any injury resulting as to the use, maintenance, construction, or location of said advertising common signage. Section 7 Termination of Lease In the event any Owner of Real Property with Heartland Center fails to timely pay assessments due, GRANTOR shall provide thirty (30) days written notice of termination of signage rights and said right of any GRANTEE to use said signage shall be terminated if the default continues beyond said thirty (30) day notice period. Section 8 Integration Clause This Lease Agreement shall constitute the entire Agreement of the parties hereto and constitute the sole obligation of GRANTOR respecting contributions for maintenance of common areas of any kind within Heartland Development, its obligation to participate in the common signage for said Heartland Center being the sole and only obligation imposed upon ANIRI, LLC. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned parties have executed this Agreement set opposite their name: ANIRI, LLC thorled Manager tuber Dated: 031k2 3 NORTH STAR TRUST COMPANY AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO MB FINANCIAL BANK N.A. AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO OAK BROOK BANK AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRSUT AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 21 , 2001 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 3191 Dated: - 'Ar 4 i r i i i Dated IL Vil i i i I i IYK 5. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS LOT 2 IN HEARTLAND CENTER RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 IN HEARTLAND CENTER SUBd'CV�SI'ON . UNIT 1 , ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED APRIL Sr 2005 AS DOCUMENT ' 200500009772 AND CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED OCTOBER 8 . 2008 AS DOCUMENT 200800022051 , IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLEr KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS i copyright AmoHan Land Title AssoolAtlon. All Aghts reserved. The use cf this Form Is rsatftiad b ALTA licenseaa and ALTA members In good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are proMbited. Repdnted under license horn the Amedcen Land Tide A.maelaeon. conUCOe .tvoaocc 2JM PAGE A2 06/05/ 12 14`C05 : 40' Appraisal f 728 L. L elrran.r Parkway, YmBui&, Il , KRUEGERAPPRAISALSERVICES INC FkNo 8400-0377 Page 16 SITE SKETCH lacketone FFF � � ,� .- • ' . ..�r mow. .. fFA a e e. w . MAP w r w ' a.. wg+rW,w.rww.a "' 1 ,; y / /y r[% le Bank A 6oldstdt' (A sail '` 1 >m p f .w � Its . .. - lot IF 'may t .ITq J 4 r�oocc � T ighthottee 1 AIR EXHIBIT " B " 08 / 31 / 2012 11 : 42 FAX 630 553 5764 DANIEL J . KRAMER 002 1002 l"AI1113fF "C , Tame of Owner PIN Number or LgLil � 1 'eicQwagc Assigned of f)escripticnt of Property that Signijew permitted to be used . ..... , . . .. _ . ...-... _� _.T .. . for Muntain � i lut,ltt to Use+ on Rual Property of ( irim _:._ . .__.' ANII I I , L.0 1 0l ' of 110 ntivul l Cntei 50'io ( toll % 01 si4n) .Ianit`: Raton;. .. _. Lot 7 ofTTcaulpnd (. utter ;?5" 6 ( 1011 lowu ',! of sie,n ) Chin ego Title. T and Trust Lots .3 , 4 5 end G of 25(X / / 11 I le Center .inland Ce l-- °� W ►mr: I I NIgLYCItloGmtaaaaAlNt,7oi Directional Sign SeIgm ,rt eve-T munniouin tlev_ West/East Elevation smw -ije ttr 1. Section seaC 1/20' r ,'-o- R�. Ghard. Marker A Inc . Architects w Builders . Developers 630.553.3322 654 HeartIcrid Drive - Yorkvill Illinois 60560 Heartland , .w�i.iMw•w•pJw�.• •I Y�rwr`Yr •w.r�ry.i•,.�.,.Pw„o-�,••�,,N P r.` •1 + ' • 7++w '► ••1'•!r .www�•w1"'i_'�'77�` et- Ow 61 4 to. te • ,±rr �±wiww�rw.w.�..w.+.ai•rpY'•:rr:.•.�:4�t.+..i.±��. • L' w- . i n • i' C• All, r: • ' L .." •' "-a Ka s'%9 '. •. r: ' 7 b tee e. t We 090 Ap he�,�.�. •-'. •�T"'} "`rte . • .- • • .. .w.www•:ww•w 0{rw.ww�ir+r.- r'�.n.�w.r�T�M••�ti•- , ••—r wr:•.p to APPOS Footing Plan state ,ii' - 14.c' I I I v •�r I It F Oat u- • 1 I I Foundation Plan SIc Mile _ ,=1t 2. Section sede ,/Y - e-c A3 C31 3. Section soars ,/' _ ,.o* MR ? s re Heartland Center Sion 1 07-04002 n••rron F. o•r DOWPfum a 2-20-07 L .11llVi R'mSWIWIf-0.1ePlm1ICY0.q Q'owf 0) d Al r 1 ni•.a r m ®]aR) IVA Inn Site Plan soim Mr a It-or Alt. T 4416 m __ _ II Heartland Center Sin I F a�=61002 Nwilm N4 Saw ommm Uw Glr 2-20-07 L i M ,PIIDO IOR�OYR— OOVFa flOtR -••• o�arn ry r.lu it PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL PC 2013-03 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT Veterans Way, LLC, Petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting a major amendment the Second Amendment to the Heartland Subdivision Annexation and Planned Unit Development dated January 11, 2005 related to the Heartland Business Center to permit the placement of an additional ten foot by sixteen foot (10'x16') sign with eleven (11)tenant sign panels within a driveway median of the subject property. The real property consists of approximately 5.1 acres of the common area located generally south of U.S. Route 34; west of McHugh Road; and north of Heartland Drive at 728 E. Veterans Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois. The Permanent Index Numbers' (PIN) of the subject parcels are as follows: 02-28-253-011 02-28-253-012 NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the City Council of the United City of Yorkville will conduct a public hearing on said application on Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 7 p.m. at the United City of Yorkville City Council Chambers, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, 60560. The public hearing may be continued from time to time without further notice being published. All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an opportunity to be heard. Any written comments should be addressed to the United City of Yorkville City Clerk, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois, and will be accepted up to the date of the public hearing. By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. BETH WARREN City Clerk By: Lisa Pickering Deputy Clerk A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number `u 0 40 Legal ❑ CA#1 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ PW 2013-08 Police ELE ��"� Public Works 0 Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: MFT General Maintenance Appropriation Resolution for FY 14 Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: Yearly appropriation for general maintenance items and for yearly lease payment to Kendall County for salt storage. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 3/19/13 Action Taken: Moved forward to CC consent agenda. Item Number: PW 2013-08 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval of resolution Submitted by: Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Agenda Item Notes: ® . Resolution for Maintenance of Minas i i i es a c of TranSp ortation Under the Illinois Highway Code BE IT RESOLVED , by the Mayor and City Council of the ( Council or President and Board of Trustees ) United City of Yorkville , Illinois , that there is hereby ( City , Town or Village) ( Name ) appropriated the sum of of Motor Fuel Tax funds for the purpose of maintaining streets and highways under the applicable provisions of the Illinois Highway Code from May 1 , 2013 ( Date) to April 30 , 2014 . ( Date ) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that only those streets , highways , and operations as listed and described on the approved Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs , including supplemental or revised estimates approved in connection with this resolution , are eligible for maintenance with Motor Fuel Tax funds during the period as specified above . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the Clerk shall , as soon a practicable after the close of the period as given above , submit to the Department of Transportation , on forms furnished by said Department , a certified statement showing expenditures from and balances remaining in the account ( s ) for this period ; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED , that the Clerk shall immediately transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the district office of the Department of Transportation , at Ottawa , Illinois . I , Beth Warren Clerk in and for the United City (City , Town or Village ) of Yorkville , County of Kendall hereby certify the foregoing to be a true , perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the Mayor and City Cuncil at a meeting on March 26 , 2013 ( Council or President and Board of Trustees ) Date IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and seal this day of ( SEAL ) Clerk ( City , Town or Village) Approved Date Department of Transportation Regional Engineer Printed 3/ 12/2013 BLR 14230 ( Rev . 11 /06 ) 111inoLs Estimate of of Transportation Maintenance Costs Section Number 13 - 00000 - 00 - GM Period from 05/01 /2013 to 04/30/2014 Municipality United City of Yorkville Estimated Cost of Maintenance Operations Maintenance For Group I II or III Material E ui ment or Labor Operation Group Unit Operation ( No . - Description ) ( i , ii , iii , iv) Item Unit Quantity Price Cost Cost Bituminous Patching IIA Bituminous Cold Patch Ton 100 110400 $ 11 , 000000 11 000 . 00 Surface Hot Mix Ton 200 70000 $ 14 , 000 . 00 14 , 000 . 00 Signs , Posts & Hardware IIA Various - Signs EA 200 50 . 00 $ 10 , 000 . 00 10 , 000 . 00 Sign Posts EA 100 40 . 00 $ 47000000 4 , 000 . 00 Brackets and Hardware EA 100 50 . 00 $ 51000000 51000000 Snow Removal I Bulk Rock Salt Ton 1200 65 . 00 $ 787000800 781000 . 00 Salt Storage Rental I Building space rental for LS 1 7175000 $ 7750000 71750 . 00 bulk rock salt storage bulk rock salt bid throu h i Illinois CMS Total Dav Labor Costs $ 1291750000 Total Estimated Maintenance Operation Cost $ 129 , 750 . 00 Preliminary Engineering Engineering Inspection Material Testing Total Estimated Engineering Cost Total Estimated Maintenance Cost $ 1291750000 Submitted : Approved : Date Date By : Municipal Official Title Regional Engineer Submit Four (4 ) Copies to Regional Engineer Page 1 of 1 BLR 14231 ( Rev . 2/23/06 ) Printed on 3/ 12/2013 9 : 26 : 10 AM 11finoLs' rtment of Tran ortation Special vi The following Special Provisions supplement the " Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction " , Adopted January 1 , 2012 , the latest edition of the " Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways and the " Manual of Test Procedures of Materials " in effect on the date of invitation of bids , and the Supplemental Specifications and Recurring Special Provisions indicated on the Check Sheet included here in which apply to and govern the construction of 13 - 00000 - 00 - GM , and in case of conflict with any part , or parts , of said Specifications , the said Special Provisions shall take precedence and shall govern . Bituminous patching - The United City of Yorkville will use a W30 or N - 50 surface sourse mix on all patches throughout the city . All patches will be performed in accordance with Section 442 of the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction adopted January 1 , 20128 I i Page 1 of 1 BLR 11310 ( Rev . 7/05 ) Printed on 3/ 12/2013 9 : 33 : 33 AM v Y LR 1013 Page IofI State of Illinois DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bureau of Local Roads and Streets SPECIAL PROVISION . FOR ROCK SALT Effective August 1 , 1969 Revised January 1 , 2002 ' All references to Sections or Articles in this asp.ecification shall be construed to mean a specific Section or Article of the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction , adopted by the Department of Transportation . Description , This item shall consist . of furnishing rock salt ( sodium chloride ) in bins or stockpiles at location designated in the Proposal . Materials . Material shall meet the re uirements of Article 1013 . 02 except that the gradation a shall be as follows : Passing . 12 . 5 mm ( I /Zinch ) sieve -- - 100 % f Passing 9 . 5 mm (3 /8 inch ) sieve _ 95 100 % � Passing 4 . 75 mm ( No . 4 ) sieve 20 90 % Passing 2 . 36 mrn { No . S ) sieve 10 :. 60 %. ! Passing 600 * Am ( No . 30 ) sieve 0 • 0% 10 /o The Department reserves the right to reject any shipments. of rock salt which are delivered in a frozen * o*r caked condition or which contain free water. The Department reserves the right to accept delivery of Rock Salt which , according to analysis by the Department , has a sodium chloride ( NaCI ) content of Jess than 96 . 0 % , but is riot less than 90 . 0 Material With* less than 90 . 0 % sodium chloride will be ' rejected . When such exceptions are allowed , payment will , be adjusted . Method - of Measurement ,, ' Rock salt will be measured by the metric ton (ton ) . Basis of Payment. This work will be pald for at the contract unit price per metric ton (ton ) * for furnishirig and transporting ROCK SALT based on the sodium chloride content . 4 Payment will be in accordance with the following schedule : NaCl Content - 96 . 0 % to 1. 00 . 0 % Net Bid price * per ton . NaCl Content 95 . 0 % to 95 . 9 % Bid price less $ 0 . 50 per metric . ton (ton ) , NaCl Content 94 . 0 % to 94 . 9 % * .Bid price less $ 2 . 00 per metric ton (ton ) . NaCl Content 90 , 0 % to 93 . 9 % Bid price less $ 4 , 00 per metricoton (ton ) , LR 442 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTEMENT OF TRANSPORTION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURES j FOR MAINTENANCE USE Effective : January 1 , 2004 Revised : June 1 , 2007 This special provision covers course graded and fine graded bituminous mixtures for use in maintaining small areas on flexible and rigid type pavement . Materials . The materials , control , quality , sampling , testing , inspection and storage of material shall conform to the specific requirements of the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction adopted by the Department of Transportation . Bituminous Patching Mixtures . The material supplier or contractor may furnish any of the following Bituminous Patching Mixtures listed in the individual Group for which the award was made . Group I — Bituminous Patching Mixtures Serial No . M - 17 - 07 : Bituminous Mixture for Maintenance Use , Emulsified Asphalt Type Serial No . M - 19 - 07 : Bituminous Mixture for Maintenance Use , Liquid Asphalt Type Serial No . M - 20 - 07 : Bituminous - Sand Mixture for Maintenance Use Serial No . M48 - 02 : Bituminous Premix for Maintenance Use , Inverted Emulsified Asphalt C BAE - 2 Serial No . M - 126 - 07 : Bituminous Mixes for Maintenance Use , Reinforced Fiber Mixture Bituminous Patching Mixture ( HMA ) : This mixture shall conform to the material requirements of Section 1030 . The mixture shall be a High ESAL IL - 12 . 5 N50 , High ESAL IL - 905 N50 , or Low ESAL IL - 9 . 5 N30 mix . The bituminous material shall be limited to asphalt PG 58 - 28 or PG 52 - 28 . Group II — Bituminous Patching Mixture ( Proprietary ) Serial No . M - 120 - 07 : Bituminous Premix for Maintenance Use - Optimix , Sylcrete , UPM , QPR- 2000 , EZ Street , SMP - Proprietary Sources Serial No . M - 133 - 96 : Bituminous Premix for Maintenance Use , Instant Road Repair - Proprietary I Placing of Bituminous Patching Mixture . All holes and depressions in the existing surface which exceed 3/4" in depth shall be repaired by removal of all loose and defective material and replaced with the specified Bituminous Patching Mixture . The material shall be compacted to produce a tight surface conforming to the adjacent area . Method of Measurement . Bituminous patching mixture will be measured for payment in metric tons ( tons ) . LR 442 Page 2of2 Basis of Payment . This work will be paid for at the contract unit price per metric ton (ton ) for BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE ( GROUP 1 ) ; BITUMINOUS PATCHING MIXTURE ( GROUP 11 ) ; When bids are taken F . O . B . trucks at the mixing plant a hauling differential of $ per ton - mile haul from mixing plant to location designated in the proposal will be used to determine the low bid . Round trip distance shall be used to calculate the hauling differential to be used to compare bids . Bidders are required to fill in the location of the plant from where they propose to supply the patching mixture , on the material proposal form . State of Illinois Department of Transportation Division of Highways Springfield SPECIFICATIONS FOR BITUMINOUS PREMIX FOR MAINTENANCE USE PROPRIETARY MIXES Serial Number : M 120- 10 1 . DESCRIPTION . The patching material shall be composed of a mineral aggregate , plant- mixed with a liquid asphalt and chemical additives from the suppliers of the proprietary mixtures . The !, bituminous material shall be capable of coating wet aggregates without stripping , and shall be available in various grades so that one such grade will enable a stockpile to remain pliable and workable at a temperature of - 26 ° C (- 15 ° F ) . The patching material shall be capable of maintaining adhesive qualities in patched areas which are damp or wet at time of application , and also after remaining in an uncovered stockpile for up to twelve ( 12 ) months . 2 . MATERIALS . Control of the materials shall be in accordance with the general requirements of Section 106 of the current Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction . If required , a five kilogram (ten - pound ) sample of the mineral aggregate and one- liter ( one-quart) sample of the liquid asphalt shall be submitted to the Bureau of Materials and Physical Research , 126 East Ash Street , Springfield , Illinois , for performing the tests specified herein . ( a) Aggregate All Coarse Aggregate used in the proprietary mixtures shall consist of crushed stone of Class B quality or better as defined in Article 1004 . 01 ( a) & (b) of the above cited Standard Specifications . ( b) Bituminous Materials The bituminous material shall be a formulation of the liquid asphalt blend prepared under the supervision of the proprietary mix supplier . It shall meet the requirements of ASTM D 2026 or ASTM 2027 , whichever applies , modified as follows : 1 SARETE CRETE EV SYLCRETE VA UPM EZ STREET SNAP ALL PRALINE OPTIMIX QPR-2000 SYL WEATHER 11 11 11 1 ASTM D 92 94 ( 200 ) 94 ( 200 ) 94 ( 200 ) 94 ( 200 ) 94 ( 200 ) 94 ( 200 ) 94 ( 200 ) 94 ( 200 ) 121 ( 250 ) Flash point (COC) ° C (° F) - minimum ASTM D 2170 Kinematic Viscosity 400 -600 2 cSt 350-3000 300 -4000 300-4000 300 -4000 400 -2500 280-400 300-4000 300 -4000 60 C ( 140 F) mm /s ( ) ( CPS ) ASTM D 95 Water _-- 002 02 061 % - maximum 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 002 0 . 2 ASTM D 402 Distillate % by Volume of Original Sample Temperature 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Distillate to 225 ° C (437 ° F) 0 0 - ° ° F 0 -5 0 -5 0 -5 0 -5 0-5 0-5 0 5 0 5 0 -0 Distillate to 260 C ( 500 ) to 315 ° C 600 ° F 0-21 0 -25 0-25 0 -25 0 - 18 8 -50 0-25 0 -25 0 - 55 Distillate ( ) Residue from distillation ° -94 72-95 --- --- 73 -95 70-95 72-95 72 - 95 80 -90 to 360 C (680 F) 70 % Volume by Difference Residue Tests : ASTM D 2171 Absolute -44 . 0 12 . 5 -42 . 5 12 . 5 -42 . 5 12 . 5 -42 . 5 12 . 5 -42 . 5 12 . 0-42 . 5 12 . 5 -42 . 5 12 . 5 -42 . 5 12 . 5 -42 . 5 Viscosity 60 °C ( 140 ° F) 11 . 5 - 40 125 -425 125 -425 ) ( 125 -425 ) ( 125-425 ) ( 120-425 ) ( 125-425 ) ( 125-425 ) ( 125 425 ) Pascal Seconds ( Poises) ( 115 4 ) ( ) ASTM D 5 Penetration 200 --- --- 200 200 300 - 25 ° C (77 ° F) --- --- 100 g , 5s — minimum ASTM D 5 Penetration , modified with 180 180 180 180 __- --- --- cone , 250C (77 ° F) 200 - 150 g , 5s — minimum ASTM D 113 Ductility 21 ° C ( 70 ° F) 100 --- 100 1 cm/min . 100-° _-- -- cm — minimum ASTM D 113 Ductility 4 ° C (39 ° F) 85 100 --- --- 100 100 100 100 100 1 cm/min , cm — minimum ASTM D 2042 Solubility in 9900 9960 9900 9900 9900 9900 99 . 0 99 . 0 99 . 9 Trichloroethylene % - minimum 2 I i ( c) Stripping T_ ests The combined UPM and liquid asphalt sh. all meet the following stripping tests : ( 1 ) pp g Stripping Tests : Dry Aggregate . Two - hundred grams of the air- dried aggregate passing the 12 . 5 mm ( /2- inch ) sieve and retained on the 4 . 75 mm ( No . 4) sieve shall be combined with 6 . 3 percent , by weight , UPM liquid asphalt and mixed in a hemispherical metal dish with a stiff spatula for three to five minutes or until a uniform coating is obtained . Twenty-five grams of this material shall be immediately place in an oven at 60 ° C ± 3 ° C ( 140 OF ± 5 ° F ) , for eighteen to twenty-four hours , after which it shall be thoroughly mixed and allowed to cool to room temperature . The sample shall then be immersed in water at a temperature of 49 ° C ± 3 ° C ( 120 OF ± 5 ° F) , and maintained at this temperature for twenty-four hours . At the end of this period , the area of the aggregate remaining coated shall be determined visually while the sample is still immersed in water . Surface coating of at least 90 percent must be retained on the aggregate .re ate . A test similar to the above using MC- 250 shall be made for comparison . Stri in Test : Wet A gregate . Two - hundred grams of the aggregate passing the 12 . 5 (2 ) Stripping g mm ( 1/2- inch ) sieve and retained on the 4 . 75 mm ( No . 4 ) sieve shall be immersed in water fortwenty four hours and the exce ss water drained off , leaving the aggregate surface wet . This aggregate shall be combined with 6 . 3 percent , by weight , UPM liquid asphalt and mixed in a hemispherical metal dish with a stiff liquid d spatula for three to five minutes or until a uniform coating is obtained . Twenty-five grams of this material shall be immediately place in an oven at 60 ° C ± 3 ° C 0 40 OF ± 5 ° F) , for eighteen to twenty-four hours , after which it shall be thoroughly mixed and allowed to cool to room temperature . The sample shall then be immersed in water at a temperature of 49 ° C ± 3 ° C ( 120 OF ± 5 ° F) , and maintained at this temperature for twenty-four hours . At the end of this period , the area of the aggregate remaining coated shall be determined visually while the sample is still immersed in water . Surface coating of at least 90 percent must be retained on the aggregate . A test similar to the above using MC - 250 shall be made for comparison . In estimating the percentage of area remaining coated , any thin or translucent area shall not be considered as being coated Proprietary mixes , Sylcrete EV , Sylcrete VA , Optimix , QPR- 2000 , EZ Street , SMP , Sakrete All Weather , and Proline shall meet the following stripping tests . ( 1 ) Place 50 grams of cold mix into a beaker containing 400 ml of boiling distilled water . Bring back to boiling and boil for 3 minutes with constant stirring at 1 revolution per second . At the end of 3 minutes , remove the beaker from the heat source and immediately decant the water . Empty the wet mix onto a paper towel and examine . The retained coating shall not be less than 95 percent . Coating and Stripping of Bitumen -A re ate Mixtures . (2) AASHTO T 182 06 C g pp g gg g 3 . INSPECTION . The Engineer or his authorized representative shall have access at any time to all parts of the plant in order to verify weights or proportions and quality of materials used in the preparation of the mixture . The manufacturer shall afford such facilities as may be required for making inspection at the plant and for collecting and forwarding samples of the ingredient materials and bituminous mixture to the Department . 3 4 . PLANT AND EQUIPMENT . Storage facilities and all equipment used in the preparation of the mixture shall be approved by the Department . An approved drier shall be available for, surface drying the aggregate when needed . The materials for individual ry g dual batches shall be measured accurately , either by volume or weight , by approved methods and equipment . A batch type mixer of approved design and capacity shall be used, in mixing the ingredient materials . However , approval for the use of a continuous mixer will be given if it can be shown that satisfactory results will be obtained . 5 . PREPARATION OF MIXTURE . The aggregate and Optimix , or QPR- 2000 , or Sylcrete , or UPM , or EZ Street , or SMP liquid asphalt shall be proportioned into the mixer and mixed for at least 30 seconds or until a uniformly coated mixture is obtained . The liquid asphalt shall be heated to a temperature of 93 ° C ± 28 ° C (200 ° F ± 50 ° F) , at the time of mixing , and in accordance with the instructions of proprietary mix supplier . When necessary to heat the aggregates , the aggregates should not be heated to more than 68 ° C ( 155 ° F ) . 6 . COMPOSITION OF MIXTURE . The ingredients shall be combined to produce a mixture meeting the approval of the Department and conforming to the following composition limits , by g p i weight , as determined by tests of the prepared mixture : 4 Gradation of Extracted Aggregate % Passing " ' SYLCRETE QPR� � " UPM . . ,f EZ SYRE�7' . , ` 51�+�P ;: , SAKFiE'TE "v I vv SIEVE 51ZE ' < ' EV AND VA 2000 ALL ; PRQLWE OPTIMIX ,. MIX # 1 MIX #2 MIX #1 MIX #2 � � MIX # 1 � MIX #2 MIX #1 MIX #2 WEATHER 12 . 5 mm 1 /2 " 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 9 . 5 mm 3/8 " 90 - 100 100 90- 100 90- 100 90 - 100 100 90 - 100 95 - 100 100 90 - 100 90 - 100 100 4 . 75 mm No . 4 20 -55 85 - 100 20 -55 20 -55 15 -55 70 - 100 20 -55 80 - 100 85 - 100 20 -55 20 -55 70 - 100 2 . 36 mm ( No . 8 ) 5 -30 10 40 5 -30 5 -30 5 -30 0 - 10 10 40 5 -30 5 - 30 20 40 1 . 18 mm ( No . 16 ) 0- 10 0- 10 0- 10 0 - 10 0 - 10 0- 10 0 - 10 0 - 10 0 - 10 0 - 10 0 - 10 10 - 30 600 pm ( No . 30 ) 0 -7 0 -7 0 - 10 x '25 300 pm ( No . 50 0 -5 M M 0 -5 0 -5 0 - 10 0 -5 0 -5 0 -5 0 -20 75 pm No . 200 ) 0 -2 0 -245 0 -205 0 -2 0 4 0 4 0 -3 1 . 5 -3 . 5 0 4 0 4 0 -2 0 - 5 Residual Bitumen 3 -6 . 5 3 -6 . 5 3 -6 . 5 3 -7 . 0 3 . 5 -6 . 5 3 . 5 -6 . 5 3 -7 3 -7 3 . 5-7 . 0 3 . 5-7 . 0 3 -7 . 0 4 . 0 -6 . 0 ' Based on percent of total aggregate weight . 2/ Based on percent of total mixture weight . 5 7 . LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY TO PUBLIC . The laws to be observed ; permits and licenses ; patented devices ; materials , and processes ; and responsibility for damage claims , shall be in accordance with the requirements of Section 107 of the above cited Standard Specifications . Effective June 1 , 2010 [This specification supersedes Serial Number M 120 - 07 , effective February 1 , 2007 . JDP/ 120- 10 i i i 6 8 - 12 ( 200 - 300 ) 3 ( 75 ) min . q 18 ( 450 ) ( 100 ) m1n . 4 ( 100 ) 0 4 0 4 ° C ( 100 ) ,�, ( 100 ) E v O r',� r- 4 E N Ln ( 100 ) O O cv [ 0 N � L400 N0 4 E ('Q O r-, m :1100 ) 0 4 - 6 ( 100 - 150 ) nm co Qa ao a N p "' °m 4 - 6 ( 100 - 150 ) Ln 1 ` v 0 0 40r- onge Orange • ° ° ° ° . ° ° v ° ° . v ° ' v ° ° • v ° ' CONE REFLECTORIZED CONE FLEXIBLE DELINEATOR VERTICAL PANEL DRUM POST MOUNTED 12 ( 300 ) 6 ° o °o ( 150 ) ° rn Y, r -) t N 0 N p Q • O O " ( °° °° a' ( 1 5 O ) 0 0 r� CD 6 LI E ° - 24 ( 600 ) ° c _ rte, °O 0 E min . E �c , c9 � 24 ( 600 ) I 4 ' ( 1 . 2 m ) 24 `- min , r' min . ( 600 ) TYPE I BARRICADE TYPE 11 BARRICADE TYPE III BARRICADE DIRECTION INDICATOR VERTICAL BARRICADE BARRICADE 0 O M t N O 0 N Warning lights ( if required ) GENERAL NOTES °m c 4 ' ( 1 . 2 m ) ... ,� min All heights shown shall be measured above the ° X pavement surface . N E All dimensions are in inches ( millimeters ) unless otherwise shown . - ° o G ° d • ° C DATE REVISIONS TRAFFIC CONTROL ® Illinois Department of Transportation 1 - 1 - 12 Added DETECTABLE PEDESTRIAN DETECTABLE PEDESTRIAN CHANNELIZING BARRICADE . DEVICES APPROVE January 1 • 2012 L, uJ � — m CHANNELIZING BARRICADE ( Sheet 1 of 3 ) ENGINEER OF OPERATIONS 1 - 1 - 09 Switched units to APPROVED January 1 . 2012 English ( metric ) . Omitted STANDARD 701901 42 01)S� LID light on vertical panel . ENGINEER 0 DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENT Type B monodirectional 18x18 ( 450x450 ) flashing light Orange flags « a 6 ' - 12 , ( 1 . 8 m - 3 . 6 m ) I I ROAD CONSTRUCTION END C I NEXT X MILES CONSTRUCTION C1 Metal or � i 24 - 10 ' G20 - 1 ( 0 ) - 6036 G20 - 20 ( 0 ) - 6024 v- wood post I I ( 600 - 3 m ) O ■ 0 5 ' ( 1 . 5 m ) min . rural Edge of ° <( ] FSPECIFIED )GN This signing is required for all projects 0 4 ' ( 1 . 2 m ) rural 7 ' ( 2 . 1 m ) min , urban pavement 2 miles ( 3200 m ) or more in length . or face _ 6 ' ( 1 . 8 m ) urban of curb F= ROAD CONSTRUCTION NEXT X MILES sign shall C be placed 500 ' ( 150 m ) in advance of pro - N E ject limits . l Co END CONSTRUCTION sign shall be erected at Elevation of edge Elevation of edge I I the end of the job unless another job Is of pavement of pavement within 2 miles ( 3200 m ) . I , 5 ' ( 1 . 5 m ) min . Dual sign displays shall be utilized on multi - embedment SIGNS ON TEMPORARY SUPPORTS lane highways . - � /k I • � A When work operations exceed POST MOUNTED SIGNS four days , this dimension shall HIGH LEVEL WARNING DEVICE WORK LIMIT SIGNING be 5 ' ( 1 . 5 m ) min . If located « * When curb or paved shoulder are present behind other devices , the height this dimension shall be 24 ( 600 ) to the shall be sufficient to be seen by face of curb or 6 ' ( 1 . 8 m ) to the outside motoristse edge of the paved shoulder . 24 ( 600 ) 5 7 ( 125 ) ( 175 ) 0 v Ln 8 ( 200 ) Federal seri \\C 1 7 ( 180 ) Federal series B ill O L N v O N O v7 Ln N M 1 2 011 ( 513 ) ( 400 ) 19 32 ( 15 ) E kJo00 All dimensions ore in inches ( millimeters ) unless otherwise shown . FRONT SIDE REVERSE SIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL Illinois Department of Transportation DEVICES APPROVE January 1 . 2012 Ul n0� I_- FLAGGER TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN ( Sheet 2 of 3 ) ENGINEER OF OPERATIONS APPROVED January 1 . 2012 STANDARD 701901 42 ENGINEER 0 DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENT 24 ( 600 ) ± rA 8 ' ( 2 . 4 m ) Q min . — O O O O O C 4 ' ( 1 . 2 m ) min . o O O O min . E o N Weep holes OC ^" 25 ' ti c / 25 ' 25 ' °o ,� E v , ( ( 8 m ) ( 8 m ) ( 8 m ) Construction N ,,o E ° O u 200 200 200 advance ( 60 m ) ± ( 60 m ) ± ( 60 ml ± warning signs E E E L► A - 4 0o C C C 4 - N N '� a E v PLAN 25 ' 5 ' ( 1 13/q ( 45 ) ± . 5 m ) Face may be — TYPE A TYPE B TYPE C stepped or smooth ROOF ROOF OR TRAILER TRAILER +1 Traffic 0 MOUNTED MOUNTED MOUNTED Epoxy channels 31/2 ( 90 ) ± ARROW BOARDS SECTION A—A TYPICAL INSTALLATION TEMPORARY RUMBLE STRIPS x 12 ( 300 ) E E min . 6 ( 150 ) 6 ( 150 ) 6 ( 150 ) E E Type A x max . �-{ ma . R11 - 2 I max , o flasher I m ROAD 0 0 CLOSED n ° Edge of shoulder . �h: : : : : ' •:/' � 12 ( 300 ) Pavement min . Type A R11 - 4 ROAD CLOSED TO ALL TRAFFIC flasher Reflectorized striping may be omitted ROAD CLOSED ROAD CLOSED on the back side of the barricades. TO TO If a Type III barricade with an attached THRU TRAFFIC THRU TRAFFIC sign panel which meets NCHRP 350 is not available , the sign may be mounted on an : : • : , • NCHRP 350 temporary sign support directly \ ' ''�� All dimensions are in inches ( millimeters ) in front of the barricade . Pavement unless otherwise shown . ROAD CLOSED TO THRU TRAFFIC Reflectorized striping shall appear on TRAFFIC CONTROL ® Illinois Department of Transportation TYPICAL APPLICATIONS OF both sides of the barricades . If a TYPE III BARRICADES CLOSING A ROAD Type III barricade with an attached DEVICES sign panel which meets NCHRP 350 is APPROVED January 1 , 2012 �, � � ( na „, � _ m not available , the signs may be mounted ( Sheet 3 of 3 ) ENGINEER OF OPERATIONS on NCHRP 350 temporary sign supports APPROVED Janry 1 . 2012 directly in front of the barricade . STANDARD 701901 42 ENGINEER 0 DESIGN AND 'ENVIRONMENT ROAD W20 - 1 ( 0 ) - 48 WORK AHEAD Or • ® ONE LANE ROAD ROAD ONSTRUCTIO W20 - 7 ( 0 ) - 48 AHEAD AHEAD W20 - 4 ( 0 ) - 48 40 � W20 - I103 ( 0 ) - 48 J \ J 100 ' ( 30 m ) Type I or Type II Barricades One way / one lane operation min . O O O O O 0 Type I or Type II barricades O O 1 1 100 ' ( 30 m ) 2 ROAD Type III barricades 2 0 O 0 CLOSED yp max . O 2 o E R11 - 2 ROAD (D o CLOSED ROAD ONE LANE AHEAD WORK W20 - 1 ( 0 ) - 48 ROAD • W20 - 3 ( 0 ) - 48 AHEAD For AHEAD maintenance W20 - 4 ( 0 ) - 48 Or and utility -J' projects W20 - 7 ( 0 ) - 48 ROAD ROAD ONSTRUCTIO ROAD ONSTRUCTIO W20 - I103 ( 0 ) - 48 AHEAD WORK AHEAD For W20 - I103 ( 0 ) - 48 Or AHEAD contract W20 - 1 (0 ) - 48 construction projects SIGN SPACING SYMBOLS Posted Speed Sign Spacing 55 500 ' ( 150 m ) 50 - 45 350 ' ( 100 m ) � Work area lO Refer to SIGN SPACING TABLE for distances . < 45 200 ' ( 60 m ) O Cone , drum or barricade ( not required for moving operations ) O For approved sideroad closures . GENERAL NOTES O3 Cones at 25 ' ( 8 m ) centers for 250 ' This Standard is used where at any time , day or Sign on portable or permanent support ( 75 m ) . Additional cones may be placed night , any vehicle , equipment , workers or their at 50 ' ( 15 m ) centers . When drums or activities Flogger with traffic control sign Type I or Type II barricades are encroach on the pavement requiring the closure used . the interval between devices of one traffic lane in on urban area . Barricade or drum with flashing light may be doubled . All dimensions are in inches ( millimeters ) O Cones , drums or barricades at unless otherwise shown . Type III barricade with flashing lights 20 ' ( 6 m ) centers. DATE REVISIONS Illinois Department of Transportation 1 - 1 - 11 Revised flogger sign . URBAN LANE CLOSURE , O APPROVED Januar y 1 2011 2L I 2W I UNDIVIDED Ln c ENGINEER OF SAFETY ENGINEERING 1 - 1 - 09 Switched units to APPROVED Jon ory 1. 2011 = English ( metric ) . STANDARD 701501 46 � Corrected sign No . ' s . ENGINEER OF DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENT 4 4 AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN KENDALL COUNTY AND CITY OF YORKVILLE CONCERNING THE STORAGE OF BULK o SAS. This Agreement is made and entered into this o day of 20 f by and between THE COUNTY OF KENDALL , and CITY OF YORKVILLE , a municipal corporation . WHEREAS , THE COUNTY OF KENDALL and CITY OF YORKVILLE are public agencies as contemplated by the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act ( 5 ILLS 220/ 1 et seq. ) ; and WHEREAS , THE COUNTY OF KENDALL has constructed a salt storage facility located at 6780 Route 47 , Yorkville , IL ( hereinafter "the Facility") designed to accommodate the storage of bulb rock salt for highway application ; and WHEREAS , CITY OF YORKVILLE is desirous of utilizing the Facility for the purposes of storing rock salt ; and WHEREAS , THE COUNTY OF KENDALL and CITY OF YORKVILLE are authorized to enter into this Agreement by Article VII, Section 10 of the Constitution of the State of Illinois and the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act ( 5 TLCS 220/ 1 et seq . ) . NC) W , THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual promises , terms and conditions set forth herein and in the spirit of intergovernmental cooperation, the parties agree as follows : 1 . The above recitals are incorporated herein by reference and fully made a part of this Agreement. 2 , CITY OF YORKVILLE shall be allowed to store up to 1000 tons of bulk rock salt at the Facility beginning April 1 , 2412 and thereafter . 3 . CITY OF YORKVILLE shall pay to KEND.ALL, COUNTY a non -refundable fee of $ 451 000 for the purpose of storing 1 , 000 toms of bulk rock salt ; payable in 6 equal installments, with the first $ 7 , 500 due on or before October 31 , 2012 and the remaining ( 5 ) $ 7 , 500 installments due in successive years on or before October 315t of each year . r Y c 4 . Nothing shall prevent the CITY OF 'YRKVILLE and KENDALL COUNTY from entering in future agreements to increase the tonnage of bulk rock salt stored at the Facility by CITY OF YORKVILLE . KENDALL COUNTY agrees that the price for future storage will remain at $ 45 /ton for the life of this Agreement . 5a CITY OF YORKVILLE shall additionally pay an annual maintenance fee of $ 250 to THE COUNTY OF KENDALL, payable on or before January 1 �t of each and every year this Agreement is in full force and effect 6 . CITY OF YORKVILLE shall retain ownership of all bulk rock salt that they store at the Facility as long as this Agreement is in full force and effect . 79 THE COUNTY OF KENDALL shall provide an accurate accounting of all bulk rack salt stored at the Facility and shall provide each agency storing salt with an annual report detailing all deliveries and pickups made by each agency during each calendar i year . Said repot shall be delivered to CITY OF YORKVILLE within 30 days after the end of each calendar year . 8 . Only untreated bulk rock salt shall be stored at the Facility . The Kendall County Engineer shall determine the definition. of " untreated " and reserves the right to refuse storage at the Facility of any rock salt deemed to be not fit or suitable for storage in the Facility at the sole discretion of the Kendall County Engineer . 9 . Bulk rock salt may be picked up or delivered during regular business hours from 7 : 30 AM to 4 : 00 PM or at any other time approved by the Kendall County Highway Department . 10 . This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual agreement of both parties . All fees paid by CITY OF YORKVILLE to THE COUNTY OF KENDALL under the terms of this Agreement shall be non-refundable . 11 . Bulk rock salt that is owned and stored by CITY OF YORKVILLE at this facility shall be removed within 30 business days after termination of this Agreement. Salt that remains after this 30 day period shall be deemed abandoned and shall become the property of THE COUNTY OF KENDALL . 12 . The party signing this Agreement on behalf of CITY OF YORKVILLE represents and warrants to THE COUNTY OF KENDALL that they have the authority to enter into and execute this agreement by and on behalf of CITY OF YORKVILLE . r 13 . CITY OF YOR.KVILLE agrees it will defends indemnify and hold hannless THE COUNTY OF KENDALL , it ' s Departments , officers and employees against any and all liability, loss , costs , damages and expenses ( 'Including attorney ' s fees ) which the COUNTY OF KENDALL , it ' s Departments , officers or employees may hereafter sustain , incur, or be required to pay ansing out of CITY OF YORKVILLE , its employees or agents actions arising under this Agreement . 1 , This Agreement may not be assigned or transferred to any other party without the express written consent of THE COUNTY OF KENDALL . 15 . This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties and there are no other promises or conditions in any other agreement whether oral or written . This Agreement supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between the parties and may not be amended or modified except with the written consent of both parties . 16 . Pursuant to 55 ILCS 5 / 5 - 1049 . 2 this Agreement shall run for a period of 99 years from the date of last signature below . 31 r ry Gohnski D e C r of Yorkville 0 i John P . Purcel Date Kendall County Board Chair I , Debbie Gillette, County Clerk in and for Kendall County, in the State of Illinois , and keeper of the records and files thereof, as provided by statute, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a true , perfect and complete copy of an Intergovernmental Agreement approved b the Kendall County Board, at its regularly scheduled meeting in Yorkville , Illinois , on the day of A . D . 20 1 2 . f ANN h w Debbie Gillette — County Clerk ( Se 11 ) A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 440 Legal ❑ CA#2 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ■ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development PW 2013-09 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ■ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Heartland Commercial Center Sanitary Sewer Acceptance Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: Acceptance Consideration Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 3/19/13 Action Taken: Moved forward to CC consent agenda. Item Number: PW 2013-09 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Consideration of Approval Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: 3� 0 Memorandum t � To: Bart Olson, City Administrator EST. `1 `�-�-�1e3s From: Brad Sanderson, EEI Zi_ CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works ;d !! "` Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: February 20, 2013 Subject: Heartland Commercial Center Sanitary Sewer Extension Marker, Inc. has made a verbal request that the City accept the Heartland Commercial Center Sanitary Sewer Extension improvements for the Heartland Commercial Center. All outstanding punchlist items for above referenced project are complete. Attached, please find the proposed Bill of Sale, which we have forwarded to the developer to execute. We recommend that the public improvements (sanitary sewer) as described in the Bill of Sale be accepted for ownership and maintenance by the City. Usually final acceptance requires a performance guarantee equal to 10% of the value of public improvements. Due to the small size of the project and the minor performance guarantee value that would remain, we recommend that the performance guarantee be released. Per Resolution 2004-52, the City Council is to accept the improvements by resolution after the City Engineer and Director of Public Works has made recommendations on the development. Please incorporate this into the next Public Works committee meeting for discussion and the next available City Council meeting for approval. i I BILL OF SALE i Seller, Marker Inc., in consideration of One and 00/100th Dollar ($ 1 .00), receipt hereby acknowledged, does hereby sell, assign, transfer and convey to the Buyer, the United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation, at 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560, the following personal property to wit described in Exhibit A attached hereto for the development know as Heartland Commercial Center Sanitary Sewer Extension, and generally shown on Exhibit B. Seller hereby represents and warrants to Buyer that Seller is the absolute owner of said property, that said property is free and clear of all liens, charges and encumbrances, and that Seller has full right, power, and authority to sell said property and to make this Bill of Sale. �/ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller has sjgned and sealed this Bill of Sale at ! o0k V1 u Lre :TLC . _ , this a6 day of wr 2013 Subscribed and Sworn to before me this a 6;°day A �EIVT L� �� nOF�IAG��ALn L n Dubajic Naary Publi0. S�atcaNfnois Notary Pblic M9eommis5bne . nponoia I I I 1 Page 1 of 1 Exhibit A Heartland Commercial Center Sanitary Sewer Extension Utilities Sanitary Sewer Main, 8" PVC 251 LF Sanitary MH 4' Dia w/Ty 1 Fr & SS Lid 2 EA I -LOT 2 - HEARTLAND CENTER ® 11-5UB0 NSION CF I.OT 3 HEARTLAND CENTER RESUBDIVISIONFOF-4 10 UNIY 1 LOT 3 IN UNIT 1 -R DEC. 12(10510DO977- ® PER DOC-#2-00.5000009772 REC APRIL REC. APRIL B, 2005 ';h E PVC 1 !' 2241 s50N 26 rnrt 1'A - .a U-'= MOTE, O0}ENSI IN, 10 - t k 642.7R _ 0-4I7i SAN,•STRUCTURES FROM'"' 878'$9 642.2R __ r LACK IQF-C17RB 637.08E 8' -L, �y.� •4'a, q y - -'�'_ - 0 15 30 60 Know what's b @IOW. Cali before you dig. PROVIDE PRECAST SCALE Zfi OPENING WEST -USC PVC DR-18 C90D PIPE -30 1 DOS SING 09SON SHEET 2)AI 8" PvC v. '. 2241 SDR 26 PROPERTY LIRE' 0.499 ° I_ A T pup � ll 647.78 '"Ac 'S IMEJ - (_ 'X 1 ( . �• �: :.�__�....� ^�V. N 14 ? a. _ MAKE PRIM FLUSH 1 %) y r 1i-1 I 1 1 W PAVMT ASBUILT PROPOSED EX DESCRIPTION V a - .?.,.JY 7 I7 Yia'i ® (D p MANHOLE SA'NCUT REMOVE AND REPLACE ROADWAY q CATCH BASIN (WmvY qua ncaTR PAVEMENT IN KIND lf. Ip^h-sr(.•!'rt.t s u•.-. ._ ❑ INLET 4= - Efl D)1 •� REMOVE G REPLACE REOD AS IN 1 CIA, —� STORM SEWER - 1 �_ _ j '.. 8" PVC I '4 ',a'PA7 N.? M1 L - -c?1 13r �} `w .I �~� SANITARY SEWER 2 241 1 SOR 26 I_ —� }- - ?.im Pn'S. _ _ ;1' .- - _i w rar;I _ _ .-f 1. 24 SD I•"`--_ _ W— WATERMAIN i \ "_. - .-.._ I .. 1 PROPERTY LINE _ I / l a \ \ 7 121-;i !)OS11NC HEAVY DUTY \� .� \ I `` ,{ I1'�" 1 r PAVEMENT SECTION OO VALVE&VAULT �.✓... - �L- � � -� P j;•=Fx>,?: PROPERTY LINE •� )� ), ® VALVE& BOX I ,___ . CONNECT TO EXIST, y•"� LOT 7 1 — i A FIRE HYDRANT HEARTLAND CENTER DOC. #IV05 0 OF LOT 3 IN UNIT 1 ee^:!?OI hr- A SANITARY STRUCTURE UII r r P PER DOC. X2005 09772 ) t .. - ,+ , , INN,=63E536 5.598 h s'y 1 t �I STREET LIGHT REC, APRIL 8, 2005 REPLACE PAINTED I „" II t ' MANNGLE BENCH TO BE REMOVED STALL STRIPING "« 1� I ` o-"-o LIGHT STANDARD' AS NEEDED ti 1 '� ; COONFGURATION,FOR NSTALL NEW PIPE r YJ-viU ��.� f.l-� 111 , 4`; {1, POWER POLE _ l y WATERTIGHT FLEXIBLE RUBBER r. 1� �1 (SEE DETAIL STD-004 ON SHEET 2) 7 -- 1 '•�+t(: fir' S :. SIDEWALK y Y r AMTNar� I _y4 I{f i •�_. ! I f f 1 .Y.nL4 Yd JDDVE' CURB di'GUTTER + y� t "-':`" 1.-5� .��_ 1 '�-:- l _ 1. !,. j I_ I..�� _:, a-rP_ h •}3: p, .,ri..H)i.. --s'.-l�-i•.._._.j-6•_}----Imo•—_� L TO F A �_ STRUCTURE fN.LOUT .. _ t ^A --aa', rf�}�$IM;j �7 5 4%4 PREkOMF0.311UWhrVS.E.SPAh9LN JOWT MAfEFAL WTH Tv'U lil f.TIH 5 fCAT"1 4`V1}I.\ `" 111 _ S'C3'v'Di^.LC JI).16 YJ II.f.AS=wIF ,YnL' `[.0 MV.Lru F'lr' •• -- ""' - I 1U<vl 4 Gxm.h F. mU T 7 a P C PAIJS Pm.S"•, eaR C �-- 1---• L t .{ :YI F S VIT C 1 V`.N E\ -K✓AS G.N rC1EL A U �:TY 4 1 V (V IA(L E4 L ILL)A40 (2)WAlE 3 CO SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY s YY NO 1�ALL PrrA1(!(A tint C E vtic -'- & - \ + Y.NAG3J C&W S(k JOP417 Gi SAW1A)tX 1y4 CENTER LINE _ T E 1— _ r� ZINJ_aL u..rr..WWI TWI;TY-4t%f24k rNft Am WAF HEARTLAND CEN R,liE51 RS 71N ON OF 40 3 IN UNIT 1 "VRV.11 AWR ROMAN- JM 13 Imt RT a6u1 7dI U"Y Fc R TP [Z - -- EXISTING EASEMENT LINE _ - _ ___ 1" ER T._A KILOS. 09772. --- 1 L PI At7:"lrfit(uYIP11+r,%ls{t'T(GR•i D FN}ICdCM'}y1[7)/q r10R7 k GyTT{P REC_APRIL S.20 - LOT 6 ----ry'-'•••-• f� S�j�r' ] HEARTLAND CENTER RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 3 - IN UNIT __ I �I _•__r - ' I PER DOC. #2005 09772 T"—". -—•�.� 'S' ___' F. `, REC. APRIL 6, 2005 I '4'}+� SIT E P N SCALE, ENGINEER'$CERTIFICATE BENCHMARKS STATE OF ILLINOIS }SS COUNTY OF DUPAGE 1, TAG BOLT ON HYDRANT f 150'EAST OF BRISTOL& q - I, CHARLES A. HULSE, AN ILLINOIS LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, SOUTH SIDE JACKSON, ELEV= 637.77 9 ACCESS,RD; - - (EAI LR�r HEREBY DECLARE THAT THESE"RECORD DRAWINGS" PERTAINING TO (WATER' + Ilk 11J1.U3Y' MAIN,SANITARY SEWER,STORA7-JEWER)( ) 2 R.R. SPIKE 'BY OTHERS IN EAST FACE OF POWER POLE® - - • qa Il1L.r (0117OOBE�H-HBHfING)CONSISTING OF SHEETS___ 1 THRU 2 THE SOUTHWEST CORNER M.HUGH &WALNUT. ELEV-635.07 I C B" USF7 PVC DR 18 0 IJ00 A 6 5 CONTAIN FIELD OBSERVATIONS BY THE ENGINEER. IT IS MY PROFESSIONAL ° 3. SET R.R. SPIKE IN EAST FACE OF 2ND POWER POLE NORTH 645 - • - TCRn � -- - - •- ----� OPINION THAT THESE "RECORD DRAWINGS"SUBSTANTIATE THAT THE R SEE.DETAIL STD-0D9 �r IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT WILL FUNCTION IN OF WALNUT&WEST SIDE McHUGH, ELEV= 637.52 4 r ON iF.PT,.2 1'" i I •1 SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TO THE DESIGN INTENT OF THE APPROVED N p1p ENGINEERING PLANS. ¢ BENCHMARKS REFERENCED WERE TAKEN FROM DATUM E - 6+A - 640 THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ROAKE . 8 ASSOCIATES, INC, PROVIDED BY CITY OF YORKVILLE (NAND 88) _ 'F :: •.. -- -.� ILLINOIS LICENSED PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM N0. 807, LICENSE EXPIRES . 6 2- M1-A..•-� 3 27 :637:44W ,•49P34 APRIL 30, 2013,UNDER MY PERSONAL DIRECTION FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE r ri i �IyI 837.tONW 8" OF THE CLIENT NOTED BELOW, REPRODUCTION OR USE BY THIRD PARTIES IS ,. }' zm_.J5 STRICTLY PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE 1, "X" CUT ON TOP OF CURB OPPOSITE FIRST FIRE HYDRANT EAST OF I - 635.59 I UNDERSIGNED. FARMSTEAD DRIVE&HEARTLAND DRIVE NORTHEAST CORNER OF INTERSECTION). ' 6"RVC 2U41. I - y� ( ) 635 ' *r 8"PW- 241 SDR 28 _f r ( -"-- 0.4 X--- "°-�� T ,V. _L�_AAI ROX V LOC.2�VERIFOY I T 65 I GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL THIS__! __DAY OF ELEVATION 642.37 Sr 26®D,+�t7X X 5 aT,",,IN FIELD MAINTAi Q•53R_ _ I ----- � A.D.,20/_ A' 2- "X" CUT ON TOP OF CURB OPPOSITE OF FIRE HYDRANT SOUTHWEST SIDE 4 R CORE ,, N DRILL / OF THE INTERSECTION OF MCHUGH ROAD AND FARMSTEAD DRIVE, J D62_�®p1 r°n ELEVATION=643.05 I 1. •VERY. SEPARATION ILLINOIS LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 062-046897 � KIM AL � - i--.--'-_- -`- .•-_-. IVII'FL NEW SAN, SEWER`_... 1 LICENSE VAUD,THROUCH NOVEMBER 30, 2019 EHpXFE11 SANITARY PROFlLE (NOT VAUD WITHOUT ORIGINAL SIGNATURE) J�J HORIZ: 1=30' C OF ILL't VERT:1•=5• Q COPYRIGHT 2012 ROAKE AND ASSOCIATES,INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PREPARED FOR: RE11509N5_ AC7A4CE AND ASSOCIATES, RICHARD MARKER ASSOCIATES, INC. ND. DATE DESCRIPTION HEARTLAND COMMERCIAL CENTER N HEARTLAND IN YORIMLLE-RECORD DRAWINGS CONSULTIN❑ ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS 728 E. VETERANS PKWY. STE. 110 - SANITARY SEWER SERVICE FOR LOT 2 - RECORD DRAWING U 1884 OUINCY AVENUE, SUITE 100A•NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS BD540 YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 - - [1RN/CKB BY: PRS CAH FIE, A811727F-SAN SEW SERV I FLU,:DK,p6. 1,10'1.1 { SHEET NO �1 Q TEL (83O) 366-3232 - FAX (890) 366-3287 (630) 553-3322 --• soue 1'=30' ATE: 10/11L12 8 317.027 I OF L A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 0 40 Legal ❑ CA#3 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ~�= City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ PW 2013-10 Police ELE ��"� Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: 50150 Parkway Tree Program Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: The information for the 2013 50150 Parkway Tree Program is attached. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 3/19/13 Action Taken: Moved forward to CC consent agenda. Item Number: PW 2013-10 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approve the 2013 50150 Parkway Tree Program. Submitted by: Laura Schraw Parks & Recreation Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Co.® Memorandum EST. _ 1836 To: Public Works Committee From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks &Recreation CC: Eric Dhuse, Public Works Director, ; C.-y 2O Bart Olson, City Administrator LLE t Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks Date: March 13, 2013 Subject: Yorkville 50150 Tree Replacement Program The 50150 Parkway Tree Program information sheet, order form, and tree species information for the 2013 year are attached. Staff is seeking City Council approval to continue the program. The limit of 36 parkway trees remains, as set in previous years' programs, unless recommended by committee to be changed for 2013 due to the large number of ash trees being removed. The 50150 program includes purchase and planting of the tree by the City, with the homeowner reimbursing the City for the cost of the tree. The City's share is in kind including pickup of trees, delivery to homes, JULIE locate,planting, first water, and all Staff time coordinating the project. To help ensure the survival of the tree, all trees except oaks will be planted in the fall. The City will allow the resident to locate the tree at their desired location, but if the location must be adjusted due to utilities, the homeowner will still approve the location prior to planting. Last year all 36 trees were sold by May of 2012, in addition to five more trees purchased as part of the Alternative Parkway Tree Program. If the 50150 program sells out again the Alternative program can be brought to City Council when necessary. RESOLUTION NO. 2013- RESOLUTION APPROVING A REVISED PARKWAY TREE PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville has considered and discussed the importance of updating the United City of Yorkville's program concerning Parkway Trees; and WHEREAS, the text of the United City of Yorkville Parkway Tree Program the City Council now desires to adopt is set forth on the attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein, and WHEREAS, it has been determined to be in the best interests of the United City of Yorkville to repeal the previous Parkway Tree Program and adopt a revised program titled "United City of Yorkville 50150 Parkway Tree Program" in the form attached hereto in Exhibit "A„ NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, that the Parkway Tree Program in the form set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein is hereby adopted as the Parkway Tree Program of the City and the previous Parkway Tree Program heretofor adopted by the City Council is hereby repealed in its entirety. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2013. CITY CLERK Resolution No.2013- Page 1 CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2013. MAYOR Resolution No.2013- Page 2 United City of Yorkville 50/50 Parkway Tree Program Through the 50150 Parkway Tree Program, the United City of Yorkville shares the cost of planting trees with homeowners. Residents simply choose the tree they want and send in a check for the cost listed on the order form. The City does the rest! The Parkway Tree Program is intended to provide quality shade trees to residents within the City to be planted within the right-of-ways along the streets and corridors throughout the City. The trees are intended to provide shade, screening, wildlife, pollution control, reduction of water runoff, soil erosion control, increased property values, reduced stress, aesthetics, and a sense of well being within the community. This program is open to all residents within City limits. If you are in a development that has not yet been accepted by the City, the developer may still be responsible for your parkway tree replacement. Please contact the number below if you have questions. All trees purchased through the program are required to be planted within the area of the right-of-way in front of or on the sides of the purchaser's property. The right-of-way area available for planting the trees varies depending on the platting of the property and the width of the right-of-way. Generally it is eight to ten feet(8' to 10') from edge of curb to edge of right-of-way. Trees must be located a minimum distance of 50 feet from any other tree in the parkway; not conflict with existing utilities,be at least 20 feet from an overhead light or fire hydrant, and must be 30 feet from any intersection. Each tree will be a minimum of 2.5"in diameter. The City will work with the homeowner to locate the tree. All trees will be purchased for a fall planting except for oak trees, which will be planted the following spring. The tree will be planted, mulched, and watered(once)by the City. After the watering, care is the responsibility of purchaser. No guarantee of viability will be provided. Please make your check payable to the United City of Yorkville. All orders must be received by Friday September 13, 2013. Please mail checks and completed application to: United City of Yorkville Parkway Tree Program 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL, 60560 If you have any questions, please contact the Laura Schraw at(630) 553-8574 or lschraw(&,yorkville.il.us. The City's limit for trees sold this year as part of the program is thirty-six(36). This program will continue on an annual basis and planting will occur at the fall of each year. Please see the reverse side for tree selection and form. For tree species photos and descriptions please go to www.yorkville.il.us under Parkway Tree Program. File Order# 2013 - United City of Yorkville 50/50 Parkway Tree Program Order Form Trees must be selected from the 50/50 Parkway Tree Program Tree List. Prices are obtained annually. Name: Address: Phone: Date: Street tree location (if house is on corner lot) Is there an existing tree or stump at this location? (circle one) Yes No (Trees can only be removed due to death, disease, or age. Only unhealthy trees will be removed. If yes is circled removal of the existing tree or stump must be approved by City staff.) Tree selected Cost By signing this agreement I understand that it is my responsibility to ensure the tree's survival by watering the tree after planting. The City will not replace the street tree due to neglect, disease, or damage. If my development has not yet been accepted by the City, I understand that I am replacing this tree at my own cost and will not seek reimbursement from the developer or the City at any future date. Sign here Please make your check payable to the United City of Yorkville. Check is due at time of order. All orders must be received by Friday, September 13, 2013. Please mail checks and completed application to: United City of Yorkville Parkway Tree Program 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL, 60560 Office use only Received by: Date: Tree removal approved: Yes No If yes,indicate size and species: If no,indicate reason: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 50/50 PARKWAY TREE PROGRAM The trees shown below give general descriptions of the character and habitat of the species. The chosen variety will be based on availability the time the City places the order with the nursery. yo Catalpa $165.00 The Northern Catalpa tree has long thing seed pods and showy clustered white bell shaped flowers in the spring. The tree prefers moist,well-drained soils, but can tolerate - wet, dry and high pH soils. The fall color is brown-green, and the fruit can be messy in the fall. Mature height is 50'- 801 . Elm $140.00 The broad arching habit of the hybrid elm tree still mimics the classic elm. Dutch Elm Disease resistant, hybrid elms ; 1 grow to 60' tall and have a nice light yellow to yellow-green fall color. These trees are susceptible to Japanese Beetles. The tree can tolerate wet sites and a range of soil pH. - Varieties: `Valley Forge', Princeton', New Harmony', `Homestead', 'Morton" `Morton Glossy' Ginkgo $178.00 r Ginkgo has fan-shaped leaves and good yellow fall color. Growing to a height of 50'-80', it can tolerate drought, heat, air pollution and salt. Soil types include dry to moist,well-drained soils. Female species are not permitted due to the harsh smell of their fruit. All species planted will be of a variety that is male only. Varieties: `Autumn Gold', `Magyar', or Princeton Sentry' Common Hackberry $133.00 Hackberry survives best in moist, well-drained soils, but can tolerate wet soils. Tolerant of salt, wind, dry sites, and alkaline soils, this tree adapts well to its environment. Fall color is green-yellow and grows to heights of 50'-90'. Varieties: `Chicagoland', `Windy City' Kentucky Coffeetree $143.00 Kentucky Coffeetree can tolerate dry to moist, well- drained soils, and is salt and drought tolerant. The varieties selected are male only and do not produce seed pods. In the spring the flowers are greenish- white pyramidal spikes and the fall color is yellow- orange. This tree can reach up to 75' feet in height and is a fast grower. Please note these trees look quite spindly with a couple of branches in their first several years, but will eventually fill in to a magnificent tree! Varieties: `Espresso', `Prairie Titan' Linden $157.00 The Linden species like well-drained soils and can - tolerant alkaline soils. This tree can be susceptible to Japanese Beetle, varieties listed are less apt to beetle feeding. They grow to 60'-80' tall, and have fragrant flowers in early summer. Fall foliage is brown-green. Varieties:American, `Silver Shadow', `Sterling' Oak $197.00 Bur Oak or Swamp White Oak, Chinquapin. Oak trees are ; . more sensitive to moving environments, and must be � y planted in the spring. At maturity, they can reach up to 75' in height. Oaks typically tolerate wet and dry soil, salt, and wind. They can survive in any soil condition, and are slow growing. The fall color ranges from brown-green , to yellow. These trees are planted in the spring to ensure better survival. Oaks have a higher survival rate if they - l. are transplanted in the spring. a Red maple $108.00 Maple trees can reach up to 50' in height, and prefer moist, well-drained soils. Fall color is yellow to orange to red for Sugar Maples and red for Red Maples. Maples are fast growers. Varieties: Autumn Flame', Franksred', `October Glory'. `Red Sunset', `Armstrong' Thornless Honeylocust $142.00 Thornless Honeylocust tolerates moist, well-drained soils, drought conditions, and salt. The rounded, open, habit has _ small compound leaves that provide light shade. Fall color is yellow. Mature height of the species is 40'-70'. 11 Varieties: `Skyline', `Shademaster', `Suncole' -' Turkish Filbert $185.00 Turkish Filbert prefers moist, well-drained soil to dry conditions. When the tree is young it has a pyramidal shape that gradually changes to an oval shape. The fall color is green-yellow and mature height is 40'-50'. This tree must be watered the first few summers until established, and then it becomes very drought tolerant. �It. D CO. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number v -n Legal : Bills for Payment Finance EST. A _ 1838 Engineer ❑ ~=� City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number Human Resources El �© Community Development ❑ '+ Police ❑ CLE ti�'� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Bills for Payment - $706,232.38 Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Amy Simmons Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515040 AA000003 DANIEL V. TRANSIER 022813 02/28/13 01 POLICE-FEB. 6 & FEB. 13 ADMIN 01-210-54-00-5467 300.00 02 HEARINGS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 300.00 515041 ACCURINT LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT. 1249304-20130228 02/28/13 01 POLICE-FEBRUARY SEARCHES 01-210-54-00-5462 50.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 50.00 515042 AMPERAGE AMPERAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY INC 0450090-IN 02/26/13 01 STREETS-PRESSURE SODIUM LAMPS, 01-410-56-00-5640 334.20 02 BALLAST KIT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 334.20 * 0450315-IN 02/27/13 01 STREETS-IGNITORS 01-410-56-00-5640 96.30 INVOICE TOTAL: 96.30 * 0450812-IN 03/01/13 01 WATER OP-ROTARY FAN SPEED 51-510-56-00-5630 11.57 02 CONTROL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 11.57 * 0450835-IN 03/01/13 01 STREETS-HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM 01-410-56-00-5640 103.95 02 LAMPS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 103.95 * CHECK TOTAL: 546.02 515043 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 610-7932338 02/26/13 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 20.49 Pagel DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515043 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 610-7932338 02/26/13 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 20.49 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 20.51 INVOICE TOTAL: 61.49 * 610-7941856 03/05/13 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 26.74 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 26.74 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 26.76 INVOICE TOTAL: 80.24 * CHECK TOTAL: 141.73 515044 ATT AT&T 6305533436-0213 02/25/13 01 POLICE-MONTHLY CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5440 54.28 INVOICE TOTAL: 54.28 * 6305536805-0213 02/25/13 01 WATER OP-MONTHLY CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5440 115.52 INVOICE TOTAL: 115.52 * CHECK TOTAL: 169.80 515045 ATTLONG AT&T LONG DISTANCE 828932136-0213 03/01/13 01 ADMIN-FEBRUARY LONG DISTANCE 01-110-54-00-5440 27.23 02 POLICE-FEBRUARY LONG DISTANCE 01-210-54-00-5440 95.33 03 LIBRARY-FEBRUARY LONG DISTANCE 82-820-54-00-5440 79.58 INVOICE TOTAL: 202.14 CHECK TOTAL: 202.14 515046 ATTORGEN OFFICE OF IL. ATTORNEY GENERAL FUND 958-JARVINER13 03/07/13 01 ADMIN-SEX OFFENDER AWARENESS 01-000-24-00-2437 30.00 02 TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND FEE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 30.00 Page 2 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515046 ATTORGEN OFFICE OF IL. ATTORNEY GENERAL FUND 958-MCCUSKER 03/07/13 01 ADMIN-SEX OFFENDER AWARENESS 01-000-24-00-2437 30.00 02 TRAINING & EDUCATION FUND FEE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 30.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 60.00 515047 AUTOZONE AUTO ZONE, iNC. 2247457360 02/28/13 01 STREETS-AUTO RANGING DMM 01-410-56-00-5640 29.09 INVOICE TOTAL: 29.09 * CHECK TOTAL: 29.09 515048 BATTERYS BATTERY SERVICE CORPORATION 230232 02/22/13 01 STREETS-BATTERY 01-410-54-00-5495 84.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 84.95 * 230260 02/22/13 01 WATER OP-REPLACEMENT BATTERY 51-510-56-00-5630 24.00 02 PACK ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 24.00 * 230413 03/01/13 01 STREETS-BATTERY 01-410-54-00-5495 85.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 85.50 * 230584 03/08/13 01 WATER OP-REPLACEMENT BATTERY 51-510-56-00-5630 12.00 02 PACK ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 12.00 * 230585 03/08/13 01 STREETS-BATTERY 01-410-54-00-5495 85.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 85.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 291.95 515049 BCBS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD Page 3 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515049 BCBS BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD 032813-DENTAL 03/14/13 01 ADMIN-APRIL 2013 DENTAL INS 01-110-52-00-5223 459.04 02 ADMIN-APRIL 2013 ELECTED 01-110-52-00-5237 547.02 03 OFFICIAL DENTAL INS ** COMMENT ** 04 FINANCE-APRIL 2013 DENTAL INS 01-120-52-00-5223 255.10 05 POLICE-APRIL 2013 DENTAL INS. 01-210-52-00-5223 2,805.99 06 COMM/DEV-APRIL 2013 DENTAL INS 01-220-52-00-5223 291.92 07 STREETS-APRIL 2013 DENTAL INS 01-410-52-00-5223 547.02 08 ADMIN SERVICES-APRIL 2013 01-640-52-00-5241 418.77 09 RETIREES DENTAL INS. ** COMMENT ** 10 PARKS-APRIL 2013 DENTAL INS 79-790-52-00-5223 644.87 11 RECREATION-APRIL 2013 DENTAL 79-795-52-00-5223 213.80 12 INS. ** COMMENT ** 13 WATER OP-APRIL 2013 DENTAL INS 51-510-52-00-5223 565.08 14 SEWER OP-APRIL 2013 DENTAL INS 52-520-52-00-5223 208.36 15 LIBRARY-APRIL 2013 DENTAL INS. 82-820-52-00-5223 495.86 INVOICE TOTAL: 7,452.83 032813-HEALTH 03/14/13 01 ADMIN-APRIL 2013 HEALTH INS. 01-110-52-00-5216 5,093.70 02 ADMIN-APRIL 2013 ELECTED 01-110-52-00-5235 5,877.49 03 OFFICIAL HEALTH INS. ** COMMENT ** 04 FINANCE-APRIL 2013 HEALTH INS. 01-120-52-00-5216 1,332.92 05 POLICE-APRIL 2013 HEALTH INS. 01-210-52-00-5216 28,891.10 06 COMM/DEV-APRIL 2013 HEALTH INS 01-220-52-00-5216 3,211.65 07 STREETS-APRIL 2013 HEALTH INS. 01-410-52-00-5216 6,162.34 08 ADMIN SERVICES-APRIL 2013 01-640-52-00-5240 5,876.23 09 RETIREES HEALTH INS. ** COMMENT ** 10 PARKS-APRIL 2013 HEALTH INS. 79-790-52-00-5216 7,123.63 11 RECREATION-APRIL 2013 HEALTH 79-795-52-00-5216 2,480.19 12 INS. ** COMMENT ** 13 WATER OP-APRIL 2013 HEALTH INS 51-510-52-00-5216 6,396.47 14 SEWER OP-APRIL 2013 HEALTH INS 52-520-52-00-5216 2,270.84 15 LIBRARY-APRIL 2013 HEALTH INS. 82-820-52-00-5216 5,311.58 INVOICE TOTAL: 80,028.14 CHECK TOTAL: 87,480.97 Page 4 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515050 CALLONE UNITED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS 1010-7980-0000-0313 03/15/13 01 ADMIN-FEB. ADMIN LINES 01-110-54-00-5440 242.15 02 ADMIN-FEB. CITY HALL NORTEL 01-110-54-00-5440 264.77 03 POLICE-FEB. CITY HALL NORTEL 01-210-54-00-5440 264.77 04 WATER OP-FEB. CITY HALL NORTEL 51-510-54-00-5440 264.78 05 POLICE-FEB. POLICE LINES 01-210-54-00-5440 683.69 06 POLICE-FEB. CITY HALL FIRE 01-210-54-00-5440 57.79 07 ADMIN-FEB. CITY HALL FIRE 01-110-54-00-5440 57.78 08 LIBRARY-FEB. LIBRARY LINES 82-820-54-00-5440 83.31 09 WATER OP-FEB. PW LINES 51-510-54-00-5440 1,203.12 10 REC CENTER-FEB. REC CENTER 80-800-54-00-5440 259.07 11 LINES ** COMMENT ** 12 PARKS-FEB. PARKS LINES 79-790-54-00-5440 39.47 13 RECREATION-FEB. RECREATION 79-795-54-00-5440 58.61 14 LINES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 3,479.31 CHECK TOTAL: 3,479.31 515051 CAMBRIA CAMBRIA SALES COMPANY INC. 33449 02/21/13 01 ADMIN-GARBAGE LINERS, PAPER 01-110-56-00-5610 125.28 02 TOWELS, TOILET TISSUE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 125.28 * 33470 03/04/13 01 SEWER OP-PAPER TOWEL 52-520-56-00-5620 55.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 55.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 180.78 515052 CARGILL CARGILL, INC 2901006401 02/21/13 01 WATER OP-BULK ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,698.59 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,698.59 * CHECK TOTAL: 2,698.59 Page 5 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515053 COLLEPRO COLLECTION PROFESSIONALS INC. 258000-J-022813 02/28/13 01 POLICE-COMMISSION ON 01-210-54-00-5467 143.75 02 COLLECTIONS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 143.75 * CHECK TOTAL: 143.75 515054 COMCAST COMCAST CABLE 022713 02/27/13 01 POLICE-CABLE TV 01-210-56-00-5620 4.23 INVOICE TOTAL: 4.23 * CHECK TOTAL: 4.23 515055 COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 0185079109-0213 03/06/13 01 SEWER OP-420 FAIRHAVEN 52-520-54-00-5480 123.90 INVOICE TOTAL: 123.90 * 0435113116-0213 03/06/13 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 84.57 INVOICE TOTAL: 84.57 * 0903040077-0213 03/01/13 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 2,372.81 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,372.81 * 0908014004-0213 03/06/13 01 WATER OP-WELLS 51-510-54-00-5480 96.29 INVOICE TOTAL: 96.29 * 0966038077-0213 03/04/13 01 WATER OP-456 KENNEDY RD VALVE 51-510-54-00-5480 111.07 INVOICE TOTAL: 111.07 * 1183088101-0213 03/01/13 01 SEWER OP-1107 PRAIRIE CROSSING 52-520-54-00-5480 115.91 02 LIFT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 115.91 * 1407125045-0213 03/07/13 01 SEWER OP-FOXHILL 7 LIFT 52-520-54-00-5480 82.42 INVOICE TOTAL: 82.42 * Page 6 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515055 COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 2019099044-0213 03/08/13 01 WATER OP-WELLS 51-510-54-00-5480 78.39 INVOICE TOTAL: 78.39 * 2668047007-0213 02/28/13 01 SEWER OP-1908 RAINTREE RD 52-520-54-00-5480 485.55 INVOICE TOTAL: 485.55 * 2961017043-0213 03/05/13 01 SEWER OP-LIFT STATION 52-520-54-00-5480 91.51 INVOICE TOTAL: 91.51 * 4085080033-0213 03/01/13 01 WATER OP-1991 CANNONBALL TRAIL 51-510-54-00-5480 262.48 INVOICE TOTAL: 262.48 * 4449087016-0213 03/08/13 01 SEWER OP-LIFT STATIONS 52-520-54-00-5480 1, 776.25 INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 776.25 * 4475093053-0213 03/06/13 01 WATER OP-610 TOWER LANE 51-510-54-00-5480 264.65 INVOICE TOTAL: 264.65 * CHECK TOTAL: 5,945.80 515056 CONSTELL CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY 0009136476 02/25/13 01 STREETS-421 POPLAR DR. 01-410-54-00-5480 6,209.68 INVOICE TOTAL: 6,209.68 * 0009136477 02/25/13 01 WATER OP-3299 LEHMAN CROSSING 51-510-54-00-5480 3,385.04 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,385.04 * 0009155494 02/27/13 01 SEWER OP-420 FAIRHAVEN WELL 52-520-54-00-5480 144.33 INVOICE TOTAL: 144.33 * 0009207068 03/03/13 01 WATER OP-2224 TREMONT STREET 51-510-54-00-5480 3,385.92 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,385.92 * 0009215488 03/04/13 01 WATER OP-2921 BRISTOL RIDGE 51-510-54-00-5480 1,913.25 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,913.25 * Page 7 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515056 CONSTELL CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY 0009241374 03/06/13 01 STREETS-1 COUNTRYSIDE PKWY 01-410-54-00-5480 194.74 INVOICE TOTAL: 194.74 * 0009241399 03/08/13 01 WATER OP-610 TOWER LANE 51-510-54-00-5480 5,214.72 INVOICE TOTAL: 5,214.72 * CHECK TOTAL: 20,447.68 515057 DAVEAUTO DAVID L CHELSEN 20396 03/06/13 01 POLICE-SQUAD REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 263.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 263.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 263.00 515058 DUTEK THOMAS & JULIE FLETCHER 384399 02/27/13 01 STREETS-HOSE ASSEMBLY 01-410-56-00-5640 61.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 61.10 * 404126 03/04/13 01 STREETS-FITTING 01-410-56-00-5640 8.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 8.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 69.10 515059 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 52241 02/20/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-KENDALL COUNTY 01-640-54-00-5465 83.50 02 TAP GRANT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 83.50 CHECK TOTAL: 83.50 515060 ELEVATOR ELEVATOR INSPECTION SERVICE Page 8 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515060 ELEVATOR ELEVATOR INSPECTION SERVICE 39689 02/28/13 01 COMM/DEV-ELEVATOR INSPECTION 01-220-54-00-5462 60.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 60.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 60.00 515061 FASTENAL FASTENAL COMPANY ILOSW13071-2 02/19/13 01 STREETS-HANDLE 01-410-56-00-5630 61.35 INVOICE TOTAL: 61.35 * CHECK TOTAL: 61.35 515062 FLATSOS RAQUEL HERRERA 031113 03/11/13 01 STREETS-TIRE REPAIR 01-410-54-00-5495 10.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 10.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 10.00 515063 GLATFELT GLATFELTER PUBLIC PRACTICE 74974102-3 12/18/12 01 ADMIN-LIABILITY INSTALLMENT #3 01-000-14-00-1400 5, 782.09 02 ADMIN-PARK/REC LIABILITY 01-000-14-00-1400 1,204.68 03 INSTALLEMNT #3 ** COMMENT ** 04 ADMIN-REC CENTER LIABILITY 01-000-14-00-1400 365.32 05 INSTALLMENT #3 ** COMMENT ** 06 WATER OP-LIABILITY INSTALLMENT 51-000-14-00-1400 689.62 07 #3 ** COMMENT ** 08 SEWER OP-LIABILITY INSTALLMENT 52-000-14-00-1400 450.30 09 #3 ** COMMENT ** 10 LIBRARY-LIABILITY INSTALLMENT 82-000-14-00-1400 792.99 11 #3 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 9,285.00 CHECK TOTAL: 9,285.00 Page 9 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515064 GRAINCO GRAINCO FS., INC. 9461 02/28/13 01 STREETS-2 TIRES 01-410-54-00-5495 1,307.58 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,307.58 CHECK TOTAL: 1,307.58 515065 HARTRICH HART, RICHARD 022713 03/07/13 01 POLICE-MONTHLY TRAINING 01-210-54-00-5415 50.00 02 MEETING FOR JANUARY & FEBRUARY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 50.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 50.00 515066 HOMEDEPO HOME DEPOT 4011965 02/19/13 01 WATER OP-PLYWOOD 51-510-56-00-5620 104.91 INVOICE TOTAL: 104.91 * CHECK TOTAL: 104.91 515067 ILPD4811 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE 011313-C 01/13/13 01 POLICE-BACKGROUND CHECK 01-210-54-00-5411 31.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 31.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 31.50 515068 ILPDSEX ILLINOIS STATE POLICE SOR FUND-JARVINEN13 03/07/13 01 ADMIN-JARVINEN SEX OFFENDER 01-000-24-00-2437 30.00 02 REGISTRATION FUND FEE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 30.00 SOR FUND-MCCUSKER 03/07/13 01 ADMIN-MCCUSKER SEX OFFENDER 01-000-24-00-2437 30.00 Page 10 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515068 ILPDSEX ILLINOIS STATE POLICE SOR FUND-MCCUSKER 03/07/13 02 REGISTRATION FUND FEE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 30.00 CHECK TOTAL: 60.00 515069 ILSROA ILSROA 031113 03/11/13 01 POLICE-ILSRO CONFERENCE FEE 01-210-54-00-5460 300.00 02 FOR 2 PEOPLE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 CHECK TOTAL: 300.00 515070 ILTREASU STATE OF ILLINOIS TREASURER 7 03/15/13 01 MFT-APRIL PYMT RT.47 EXPANSION 15-155-60-00-6079 10,158.33 02 WATER OP-APRIL PYMT RT.47 51-510-60-00-6079 10, 757.81 03 EXPANSION ** COMMENT ** 04 SEWER OP-APRIL PYMT RT.47 52-520-60-00-6079 5,564.38 05 EXPANSION ** COMMENT ** 06 DOWNTOWN TIF-APRIL PYMT RT.47 88-880-60-00-6079 1,666.67 07 EXPANSION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 28,147.19 CHECK TOTAL: 28,147.19 515071 JOHNSOIL JOHNSON OIL COMPANY IL NP37293188 03/01/13 01 POLICE-GASOLINE 01-210-56-00-5695 363.12 INVOICE TOTAL: 363.12 * CHECK TOTAL: 363.12 515072 JSHOES JEFFREY L. JERABEK Page 11 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515072 JSHOES JEFFREY L. JERABEK 0538-39 03/11/13 01 SEWER OP-BOOTS 52-520-56-00-5600 150.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 150.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 150.00 515073 JUSTSAFE JUST SAFETY, LTD 18907 02/26/13 01 ADMIN-FIRST AID SUPPLIES 01-110-56-00-5610 37.10 INVOICE TOTAL: 37.10 * CHECK TOTAL: 37.10 515074 KCRECORD KENDALL COUNTY RECORD 17453 02/07/13 01 POLICE-EMPLOYMENT DISPLAY AD 01-210-54-00-5426 77.52 INVOICE TOTAL: 77.52 * 17688 02/14/13 01 POLICE-EMPLOYMENT DISPLAY AD 01-210-54-00-5426 77.52 INVOICE TOTAL: 77.52 * 17934 02/21/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-HEARTLAND 90-042-42-00-0011 28.40 02 CIRCLE ANNEXATION AMENDMENT ** COMMENT ** 03 ADMIN-2014 BUDGET LEGAL NOTICE 01-110-54-00-5426 13.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 42.00 * 18163 02/28/13 01 FOX HILL SSA-MOWING BID NOTICE 11-111-54-00-5495 81.90 02 SUNFLOWER SSA-MOWING BID 12-112-54-00-5495 81.90 03 NOTICE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 163.80 * CHECK TOTAL: 360.84 515075 LANEMUCH LANER, MUCHIN, DOMBROW, BECKER 414814 02/01/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-2012 GENERAL 01-640-54-00-5463 90.00 Page 12 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515075 LANEMUCH LANER, MUCHIN, DOMBROW, BECKER 414814 02/01/13 02 COUNSELING SERVICES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 90.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 90.00 515076 MCKIRGN RANDY MCKIRGAN 74329 02/04/13 01 WATER OP-DIESEL 51-510-56-00-5695 1, 746.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 746.50 * 74341 02/06/13 01 STREETS-OIL 01-410-54-00-5495 434.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 434.50 * 74382 02/21/13 01 STREETS-DIESEL 01-410-56-00-5695 1,062.98 02 WATER OP-DIELSEL 51-510-56-00-5695 1,062.98 03 SEWER OP-DIESEL 52-520-56-00-5695 1,063.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,188.96 * 74402 02/28/13 01 STREETS-DIESEL 01-410-56-00-5695 1,060.80 02 WATER OP-DIESEL 51-510-56-00-5695 1,060.80 03 SEWER OP-DIESEL 52-520-56-00-5695 1,060.80 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,182.40 * CHECK TOTAL: 8,552.36 515077 MCOFFICE MCGRATH OFFICE EQUIPMENT, INC. 101088 03/01/13 01 ADMIN-01/20/13-02/20/13 COPIER 01-110-54-00-5485 174.44 02 LEASE ** COMMENT ** 03 FINANCE-01/20/13-02/20/13 01-120-54-00-5485 139.56 04 COPIER LEASE ** COMMENT ** 05 COMM/DEV-01/20/13-02/20/13 01-220-54-00-5485 216.75 06 COPIER LEASE ** COMMENT ** 07 POLICE-01/20/13-02/20/13 01-210-54-00-5485 457.00 Page 13 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515077 MCOFFICE MCGRATH OFFICE EQUIPMENT, INC. 101088 03/01/13 08 COPIER LEASE ** COMMENT ** 09 STREETS-01/20/13-02/20/13 01-410-54-00-5485 42.00 10 COPIER LEASE ** COMMENT ** 11 WATER OP-01/20/13-02/20/13 51-510-54-00-5485 42.00 12 COPIER LEASE ** COMMENT ** 13 SEWER OP-01/20/13-02/20/13 52-520-54-00-5485 42.00 14 COPIER LEASE ** COMMENT ** 15 PARKS-01/20/13-02/20/13 COPIER 79-790-54-00-5485 78.13 16 LEASE ** COMMENT ** 17 RECREATION-01/20/13-02/20/13 79-795-54-00-5485 173.13 18 COPIER LEASE ** COMMENT ** 19 REC CENTER-01/20/13-02/20/13 80-800-54-00-5485 136.99 20 COPIER LEASE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,502.00 101089 03/01/13 01 ADMIN-FEB. COPY CHARGES 01-110-54-00-5430 460.95 02 FINANCE-FEB. COPY CHARGES 01-120-54-00-5430 153.65 03 COMM/DEV-FEB. COPY CHARGES 01-220-54-00-5430 48.66 04 POLICE-FEB. COPY CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5430 94.31 05 WATER OP-FEB. COPY CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5430 7.30 06 PARKS-FEB. COPY CHARGES 79-790-54-00-5462 12.98 07 RECREATION-FEB. COPY CHARGES 79-795-54-00-5462 41.26 08 REC CENTER-FEB. COPY CHARGES 80-800-54-00-5462 33.14 09 SEWER OP-FEB. COPY CHARGES 52-520-54-00-5430 7.31 INVOICE TOTAL: 859.56 CHECK TOTAL: 2,361.56 515078 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 20795 02/26/13 01 POLICE-HEADLIGHT ENCAPS 01-210-56-00-5620 11.88 INVOICE TOTAL: 11.88 * 20921 02/27/13 01 STREETS-POST MOUNTS 01-410-56-00-5620 37.56 INVOICE TOTAL: 37.56 * Page 14 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515078 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 21377 03/04/13 01 STREETS-GLOVES 01-410-56-00-5620 19.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 19.98 * 21595 03/07/13 01 WATER OP-PROPANE CYLINDER 51-510-56-00-5620 5.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 5.00 * 21694 03/08/13 01 WATER OP-STUDS 51-510-56-00-5620 10.72 INVOICE TOTAL: 10.72 * 21707 03/08/13 01 WATER OP-SELF DRILL 51-510-56-00-5620 4.79 INVOICE TOTAL: 4.79 * CHECK TOTAL: 89.93 515079 MINER MINER ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 248813 02/28/13 01 POLICE-VERIFIED PROPER 01-210-54-00-5495 47.50 02 NARROWBAND PROGRAMMING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 47.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 47.50 515080 MJELECT MJ ELECTRICAL SUPPLY, INC. 1129952-01 09/13/12 01 STREETS-BULBS 01-410-56-00-5640 222.40 INVOICE TOTAL: 222.40 * CHECK TOTAL: 222.40 515081 MORTON MORTON SALT, INC 5400112848 03/01/13 01 MFT-BULK SAFE-T-SALT 15-155-56-00-5618 1,034.58 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,034.58 * 5400114108 03/04/13 01 MFT-BULK SAFE-T-SALT 15-155-56-00-5618 3,341.26 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,341.26 * CHECK TOTAL: 4,375.84 Page 15 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515082 NICOR NICOR GAS 00-41-22-8748 4-0213 03/07/13 01 ADMIN-1107 PRAIRIE LANE 01-110-54-00-5480 55.72 INVOICE TOTAL: 55.72 * 15-41-50-1000 6-0213 03/08/13 01 ADMIN-804 GAME FARM RD 01-110-54-00-5480 415.28 INVOICE TOTAL: 415.28 * 15-63-74-5733 2-0213 03/05/13 01 ADMIN-1955 S. BRIDGE STREET 01-110-54-00-5480 30.19 INVOICE TOTAL: 30.19 * 15-64-61-3532 5-0213 03/07/13 01 ADMIN-1991 CANNONBALL TRAIL 01-110-54-00-5480 30.56 INVOICE TOTAL: 30.56 * 20-52-56-2042 1-0213 03/08/13 01 ADMIN-420 FAIRHAVEN DR 01-110-54-00-5480 77.14 INVOICE TOTAL: 77.14 * 23-45-91-4862 5-0213 03/05/13 01 ADMIN-101 BRUELL STREET 01-110-54-00-5480 85.04 INVOICE TOTAL: 85.04 * 31-61-67-2493 1-0213 03/07/13 01 ADMIN-276 WINDHAM CIRCLE 01-110-54-00-5480 26.45 INVOICE TOTAL: 26.45 * 45-12-25-4081 3-0213 03/05/13 01 ADMIN-201 W. HYDRAULIC 01-110-54-00-5480 283.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 283.95 * 46-69-47-6727 1-0213 03/07/13 01 ADMIN-1975 BRIDGE STREET 01-110-54-00-5480 82.46 INVOICE TOTAL: 82.46 * 49-25-61-1000 5-0213 03/05/13 01 ADMIN-1 VAN EMMON RD 01-110-54-00-5480 157.22 INVOICE TOTAL: 157.22 * 66-70-44-6942 9-0213 03/08/13 01 ADMIN-100 RAINTREE RD 01-110-54-00-5480 94.01 INVOICE TOTAL: 94.01 * CHECK TOTAL: 1,338.02 Page 16 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515083 OLSONB BART OLSON 031213 03/12/13 01 DOWNTOWN TIF-MEAL, PARKING & 88-880-54-00-5420 235.28 02 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** 03 ASSOCIATED WITH CANOECOPIA ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 235.28 CHECK TOTAL: 235.28 515084 ORRK KATHLEEN FIELD ORR & ASSOC. 13975 03/10/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-ADMIN LEGAL 01-640-54-00-5456 5,339.00 02 MATTERS ** COMMENT ** 03 ADMIN SERVICES-KENDALL MARKET 01-640-54-00-5456 570.00 04 PLACE ** COMMENT ** 05 PARKS-REC CENTER MATTERS 79-790-54-00-5466 123.50 06 DOWNTOWN TIF-LEGAL MATTERS 88-880-54-00-5466 522.50 07 DOWNTOWN TIF-DOWNTOWN 88-880-54-00-5466 304.00 08 BUSINESS DISTRICT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 6,859.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 6,859.00 515085 OSWPRINT JAMES A AGEMA C1220 02/25/13 01 ADMIN-2,500 WINDOW ENVELOPES 01-110-56-00-5610 147.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 147.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 147.50 515086 PARADISE PARADISE CAR WASH 222528 03/04/13 01 POLICE-FEBRUARY CAR WASHES 01-210-54-00-5495 18.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 18.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 18.00 Page 17 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515087 PATTEN PATTEN INDUSTRIES, INC. PM600218456 02/15/13 01 STREETS-CITY HALL GENERATOR 01-410-54-00-5446 885.96 02 REPAIR ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 885.96 CHECK TOTAL: 885.96 515088 R0001140 BARBARA SWIATEK 030513 03/05/13 01 ADMIN-REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT ON 01-000-13-00-1371 67.57 02 FINAL BILL FOR 0104120500-00 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 67.57 CHECK TOTAL: 67.57 515089 R0001141 STEPHEN GUENZLER 030613 03/06/13 01 STREETS-REIMBURSEMENT FOR 01-410-56-00-5620 5.38 02 MAILBOX BRACKET ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 5.38 CHECK TOTAL: 5.38 515090 R0001142 CAROL PARNELL 030613 03/06/13 01 STREETS-MAILBOX REIMBURSEMENT 01-410-56-00-5620 67.97 INVOICE TOTAL: 67.97 CHECK TOTAL: 67.97 515091 SERVMASC SERVICEMASTER COMM. CLEANING 160937 02/15/13 01 ADMIN-MARCH 2013 CITY OFFICE 01-110-54-00-5488 1,196.00 02 CLEANING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,196.00 CHECK TOTAL: 1, 196.00 Page 18 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515092 SHREDIT SHRED-IT 9401582273 02/10/13 01 POLICE-SHREDDING 01-210-54-00-5462 108.51 INVOICE TOTAL: 108.51 CHECK TOTAL: 108.51 515093 SOFTWARE SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE 411272 03/04/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-SECURE 01-640-54-00-5450 1, 725.00 02 DESTRUCTION OF 23 HARD DRIVES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1, 725.00 CHECK TOTAL: 1, 725.00 515094 SPEEDWAY SPEEDWAY 1001542438-0313 03/01/13 01 PARKS-FEBRUARY GASOLINE 79-790-56-00-5695 1,469.36 02 RECREATION-FEBRUARY GASOLINE 79-795-56-00-5695 57.28 03 POLICE-FEBRUARY GASOLINE 01-210-56-00-5695 5,933.01 04 WATER OP-FEBRUARY GASOLINE 51-510-56-00-5695 1,063.51 05 SEWER OP-FEBRUARY GASOLINE 52-520-56-00-5695 1,063.50 06 STREETS-FEBRUARY GASOLINE 01-410-56-00-5695 1,063.50 07 COMM/DEV-FEBRUARY GASOLINE 01-220-56-00-5695 208.15 INVOICE TOTAL: 10,858.31 CHECK TOTAL: 10,858.31 515095 STREICH STREICHERS I1001675 02/25/13 01 POLICE-BELTCLIPS 01-210-56-00-5600 224.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 224.00 * I1002193 02/27/13 01 POLICE-HOLSTER, BELT 01-210-56-00-5600 139.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 139.00 * I1004328 03/07/13 01 POLICE-BALL VEST 01-210-56-00-5600 610.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 610.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 973.00 Page 19 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515096 SUBLAWEN SUBURBAN LAW ENFORCEMENT 031213 03/12/13 01 POLICE-LEAP ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 01-210-54-00-5460 30.00 02 DUES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 30.00 CHECK TOTAL: 30.00 515097 TREASURE TREASURER STATE OF ILLINOIS FUND 527-MCCUSKER 03/07/13 01 ADMIN-SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT 01-000-24-00-2437 10.00 02 BOARD FUND FEE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10.00 * FUND527-JARVINEN13 03/07/13 01 SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT 01-000-24-00-2437 10.00 02 BOARD FUND FEE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 20.00 515098 VERIZON VERIZON WIRELESS 9700854394 03/01/13 01 COMM/DEV-FEB. 2013 CHARGES 01-220-54-00-5440 157.49 02 POLICE-FEB. 2013 CHARGES 01-210-54-00-5440 679.72 03 PARKS-FEB. 2013 CHARGES 79-790-54-00-5440 148.44 04 RECREATION-FEB. 2013 CHARGES 79-795-54-00-5440 60.16 05 WATER OP-FEB. 2013 CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5440 220.21 06 STREETS-FEB. 2013 CHARGES 01-410-54-00-5440 139.16 07 SEWER OP-FEB. 2013 CHARGES 52-520-54-00-5440 77.34 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,482.52 CHECK TOTAL: 1,482.52 515099 VITOSH VITOSH REPORTING SERVICE CMV 1508 03/05/13 01 COMM/DEV-BRIARWOOD/CORNERSTONE 01-220-54-00-5462 142.92 Page 20 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515099 VITOSH VITOSH REPORTING SERVICE CMV 1508 03/05/13 02 PUBLIC HEARING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 142.92 CHECK TOTAL: 142.92 515100 WALMART WALMART COMMUNITY 022213-CITY 02/22/13 01 ADMIN-PAPER TOWELS, FORKS, 01-110-56-00-5610 36.90 02 KLEENEX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 36.90 CHECK TOTAL: 36.90 515101 WAREHOUS WAREHOUSE DIRECT 1865810-0 02/27/13 01 ADMIN-PAPER 01-110-56-00-5610 590.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 590.00 * 1870629-0 03/04/13 01 COMM/DEV-FOLDERS 01-220-56-00-5610 12.18 INVOICE TOTAL: 12.18 * C1806125-0 02/15/13 01 FINANCE-MERCHANDISE RETURN 01-120-56-00-5610 -180.98 02 CREDIT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: -180.98 * CHECK TOTAL: 421.20 515102 WIREWIZ WIRE WIZARD OF ILLINOIS, INC 15308 03/01/13 01 WATER OP-04/01/13-06/30/13 51-510-54-00-5445 310.50 02 BURGLAR ALARM MONITORING ** COMMENT ** 03 SEWER OP-04/01/13-06/30/13 52-520-54-00-5444 310.50 04 BURGLAR ALARM MONITORING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 621.00 CHECK TOTAL: 621.00 Page 21 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515103 WTRPRD WATER PRODUCTS, INC. 0236650-2 11/21/12 01 WATER OP-UNPAID REMAINDER OF 51-510-56-00-5640 40.00 02 ORIGINAL INVOICE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 40.00 * 0238137 02/25/13 01 WATER OP-HYDRANT REPAIR AT 51-510-56-00-5620 2,275.36 02 RT.34 & AUTUMN CREEK ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 2,275.36 * 0238138 02/25/13 01 WATER OP-BREAK FLANGE REPAIR 51-510-56-00-5620 179.00 02 KIT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 179.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 2,494.36 515104 YBSD YORKVILLE BRISTOL 022813SF 03/04/13 01 ESCROW-FEB. 2013 SANITARY FEES 95-000-24-00-2450 263,456.40 INVOICE TOTAL: 263,456.40 * CHECK TOTAL: 263,456.40 515105 YORKACE YORKVILLE ACE & RADIO SHACK 147588 02/28/13 01 STREETS-VELCRO, SPRAY PAINT 01-410-56-00-5620 9.48 INVOICE TOTAL: 9.48 * 147679 03/08/13 01 WATER OP-CORED PLUGS 51-510-56-00-5620 10.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 10.98 * CHECK TOTAL: 20.46 515106 YORKAREA YORKVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF 28589 02/19/13 01 ADMIN-2013 ANNUAL DINNER 01-110-54-00-5415 300.00 Page 22 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515106 YORKAREA YORKVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF 28589 02/19/13 02 ATTENDEES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 CHECK TOTAL: 300.00 515107 YORKGFPC PETTY CASH 031113 03/11/13 01 FINANCE-POST OFFICE BULK MAIL 01-120-54-00-5462 0.50 02 PERMIT ** COMMENT ** 03 WATER OP-POST OFFICE BULK MAIL 51-510-54-00-5462 6.70 04 PERMIT ** COMMENT ** 05 SEWER OP-POST OFFICE BULK MAIL 52-520-54-00-5462 2.80 06 PERMIT ** COMMENT ** 07 WATER OP-KANE COUNTY WATER 51-510-54-00-5412 20.00 08 ASSOCIATION MEETING ** COMMENT ** 09 DOWNTOWN TIF-CANOECOPIA MEAL 88-880-54-00-5420 19.00 10 & PARKING REINBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 49.00 CHECK TOTAL: 49.00 515108 YORKNAPA YORKVILLE NAPA AUTO PARTS 030439 02/05/13 01 STREETS-SINGLE FLINTS, LAMP, 01-410-56-00-5640 13.46 02 FLINT TORCH LIGHTER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 13.46 031841 02/20/13 01 STREETS-OIL FILTER, FUEL 01-410-56-00-5640 45.80 02 FILER, ADAPTER, GAUGE, BLOW ** COMMENT ** 03 GUN, BATTERY CABLES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.80 031880 02/20/13 01 STREETS-BATTERY CABLES, OIL 01-410-56-00-5640 22.82 INVOICE TOTAL: 22.82 Page 23 DATE: 03/20/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24 TIME: 08:39:35 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/26/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515108 YORKNAPA YORKVILLE NAPA AUTO PARTS 032011 02/21/13 01 WATER OP-GALLON OF RTU 51-510-56-00-5620 11.52 INVOICE TOTAL: 11.52 * 032076 02/22/13 01 WATER OP-BULB 51-510-56-00-5620 17.30 INVOICE TOTAL: 17.30 * CHECK TOTAL: 110.90 515109 ZEPSALES ACUITY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC 9000143271 02/26/13 01 SEWER OP-BULK SHOP CLEANING 52-520-56-00-5620 950.79 02 SUPPLIES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 950.79 CHECK TOTAL: 950.79 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 473,277.57 Page 24 DATE: 03/08/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 11:16:57 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/13/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515036 R0001138 BRIAN GALLOWAY 20120165 BUILD 03/07/13 01 WATER OP-1273 TAUS CIRCLE 51-000-24-00-2445 6,000.00 02 BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** 03 SEWER OP-1273 TAUS CIRCLE 52-000-24-00-2445 4,000.00 04 BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 10,000.00 515037 R0001139 MICHAEL PETERSON 20120560 BUILD 03/04/13 01 MUNICIPAL BUILDING-1491 16-000-24-00-2445 300.00 02 CRIMSON LANE BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** 03 PW CAPITAL-1491 CRIMSON LANE 21-000-24-00-2445 1,400.00 04 BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** 05 CW CAPITAL-1491 CRIMSON LANE 23-000-24-00-2445 5,640.00 06 BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** 07 WATER OP-1491 CRIMSON LANE 51-000-24-00-2445 2,660.00 08 BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 10,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 20,000.00 Page 25 DATE: 03/11/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:27:36 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 03/11/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 515038 ILSECRET ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 031113 03/11/13 01 PD CAPITAL-ARTICLE 36 SEIZURE 20-200-54-00-5462 95.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 95.00 CHECK TOTAL: 95.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 95.00 Page 26 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY 3/15/2013 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS MAYOR & LIQ. COM. $ 908.34 $ - $ 908.34 $ - $ 69.49 $ 977.83 CLERK 1,141.67 - 1,141.67 79.58 75.63 1,296.88 TREASURER 241.67 - 241.67 25.93 18.06 285.66 ALDERMAN 3,900.00 - 3,900.00 364.82 263.82 4,528.64 ADMINISTRATION 10,271.61 - 10,271.61 1,021.24 728.64 12,021.49 FINANCE 7,019.89 - 7,019.89 753.24 521.80 8,294.93 POLICE 75,734.41 2,590.43 78,324.84 271.42 5,761.23 84,357.49 COMMUNITY DEV. 7,875.68 - 7,875.68 762.35 580.43 9,218.46 STREETS 10,030.59 972.13 11,002.72 1,180.57 811.28 12,994.57 WATER 13,144.91 112.95 13,257.86 1,422.59 965.75 15,646.20 SEWER 6,656.51 - 6,656.51 714.23 498.62 7,869.36 PARKS 15,428.33 - 15,428.33 1,655.45 1,136.95 18,220.73 RECREATION 10,267.78 - 10,267.78 986.94 759.11 12,013.83 REC. CENTER 5,823.32 - 5,823.32 298.42 445.53 6,567.27 LIBRARY 16,340.51 - 16,340.51 1,003.61 1,222.35 18,566.47 TOTALS $ 184,785.22 $ 3,675.51 $ 188,460.73 $ 10,540.39 $ 13,858.69 $ 212,859.81 TOTAL PAYROLL $ 212,859.81 Page 27 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL BILL LIST SUMMARY Tuesday, March 26, 2013 PA YROLL DATE BI-WEEKLY 3/15/2013 $205,770.80 ELECTED OFFICIAL 3/15/2013 $7,089.01 TOTAL PAYROLL $212,859.81 ACCOUNTS PA YABLE MANUAL CHECK-#515036-GALLOWAY BUILD CHECK 3/13/2013 $10,000.00 MANUAL CHECK-#515038-ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE 3/13/2013 $95.00 MANUAL CHECK-#515039- PETERSON BUILD CHECK 3/18/2013 $10,000.00 BILLS LIST- FY 13 3/26/2013 $473,277.57 TOTAL BILLS PAID $493,372.57 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $7065232.38 Page 28 A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 4.0 Legal ❑ Mayor#I Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development CC 2013-16 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: B.U.I.L.D. Incentive Program 2nd Extension Request Meeting and Date: City Council/March 26, 2013 Synopsis: 2nd extension Request of the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (BUILD) Incentive Program. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 3/12/2013 Action Taken: Direction Item Number: CC 2013-16 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Recommendation Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Attached is a draft ordinance for the extension of the B.U.I.L.D. program for one (1)year from date of approval with no maximum building permit cap. Crr o n Memorandum EST. 1838 -�= To: City Council Gl ~ From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator <LE Date: March 1, 2013 Subject: B.U.I.L.D. Incentive Program 2nd Extension Request Background & Request As the City Council is aware, in July 2012, an extension to Yorkville's first comprehensive incentive/stimulus package for new single-family detached residential construction was approved. The extension allowed the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (B.U.I.L.D.) program, which delayed and reduced building permit/impact fees for builders, as well as rebated building permit fees to homebuyers, to run until June 30, 2013 or for a total of sixty (60) qualifying new single-family residential building permits to be issued. The program was originally approved in January 2012 and was initially for six(6) months or thirty(30)permits,whichever first. To date, the City has received fifty-three (53) B.U.I.L.D. permit applications, with only seven (7) permits remaining. Due to the widely successful year the B.U.I.L.D. program has had and the positive feedback from builders and homebuyers alike, staff is seeking the Council's interest in extending the B.U.-I.L.D. for an additional year without a permit limitation. This request would have normally been forwarded with a committee recommendation from EDC; however, the March EDC meeting was cancelled and due to the essence of time, this matter was forwarded to the City Council for expediency. Below is a brief refresher of how the program actually works, its documented success, and the merits for continuing the incentive beyond its current extension. Program Overview How it Works The B.U.I.L.D.program offers two (2)key benefits,which are: • To assist the developer/builder under the B.U.I.L.D. program, payment of building permit and impact fees are delayed until the issuance of the certificate of occupancy on the condition that the certificate is issued within one (1)year from building permit approval. • To assist the homebuyer, the City rebates a portion of the building permit fee, up to $5,000.00 with a matching contribution up to $5,000.00 from the builder/developer, and presents the homebuyer with a check for up to $10,000.00 after closing and upon issuance of the final certificate of occupancy. These incentives are in addition to the municipal building impact fee being reduced from $5,509.00 per residential unit to $1,759.00 per residential unit. To qualify for the B.U.I.L.D. program the property must be a new construction single-family detached structure. "Spec" houses, duplexes and townhomes are not eligible. The developer/builder must provide proof of sale or contract for sale of the lot prior to issuance of building permit, and changes in buyer or cancellation of sales contract must be reported to City immediately. Finally, the builder/developer must sign a "Developer Contribution Agreement" consenting to match, dollar for dollar, up to $5,000.00 the required contribution to be paid to the homebuyer at issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The builder's matching contribution is collected at the same time the building permit fees are due. The flexibility in the timing of the City receiving payment for permits allows builders to move forward with construction without this up-front expense. Additionally, in order to rebate the City's portion of the B.U.I.L.D. program incentive, staff collects the full amount of the building permit from the developer/builder, and refunds a portion of the permit cost back to the homeowner by rebating all or a some the following fees, listed in order of priority, to arrive at$5,000.00: CITY OF • •KVILLE BUILDING PERMIT FEE FEE AMOUNT FOR SF DWELLING UNIT Water Connection Fee $3,700 City Sewer Connection Fee $2,000.00 Building Permit Fee $650.00 plus $0.20 per square foot Public Works Fee $700.00 B.U.I.L.D. Success As stated previously, since the City Council's initial approval of the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (B.U.I.L.D.) program in January 2012, the Building Department has received fifty-three (53) applications for new single-family detached residences as part of the incentive, of which forty-six (46) permits have been issued. This is in addition to thirty-eight (38) regular new home start building permits issued, bringing the overall total of new residential construction permits issued to eighty-four (84) since the beginning of 2012. Over the past year, the City has nearly matched the total 85 new single-family residential home starts issued for calendar years 2010 and 2011. The bar chart below compares the number of B.U.I.L.D. permits to non-B.U.I.L.D. new single-family residential permits applied for between January 2012 and February 2013. In each month, with the exceptions of March, May and August, the B.U.I.L.D. permits have out-paced or matched the number of traditional building permits issued. 10 5-// ■SFD ❑B.U.I.L.D. 0 SFD Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul-12 Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 Merits of Program The B.U.I.L.D. program has been well-received from the building community and garnered significant interest from the public and press. Several articles in the Beacon News, Kendall County Record and in the Chicago Sun Times newspapers have been published about the program (see attached). 1 Water Connection Fee of$3,700 became effective on June 15,2006. The average construction value of the B.U.I.L.D. permit applications submitted was approximately $160K, and generated approximately $770,000.00 in permit fees. Less the $5,000 rebated for each of the 46 permits issued for, the City increased its revenue by over$540,000.00 over the past year due to the B.U.I.L.D. program alone. Consequently, most of the builders who apply for permits through B.U.I.L.D. opt to pay the fees upfront rather than take advantage of the delayed payment until time of final occupancy. Program Feedback Finally, as part of the B.U.I.L.D. check issuance process, we ask the homebuyers to complete a brief survey providing feedback on their experience with the program. To date, we have received thirty-two (32) completed surveys from those buyers and have tabulated their responses in the attached summary. Overall, the program has been successful in its main objective, which was to influence stimulate development in the City and influence those who would otherwise not build new or build in Yorkville to do so. As demonstrated in the survey results, 72% of the respondents said that the B.U.I.L.D. was extremely or very influential in their decision to purchase a new home in Yorkville and 81% strongly or somewhat agreed that they would not have moved to Yorkville this year if not for the B.U.I.L.D. program. In addition, 80% of the respondents had looked at other communities to either buy or build a new home, but ultimately decided to build new in Yorkville. Staff Comments Staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding the proposed 2nd extension of the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (B.U.I.L.D.) program for an additional year without permit number limitation. We hope to continue to offer this program in conjunction with the other incentive-based new home construction packages to spur development in other parts of the City staff is working on which will be presented at an upcoming meeting. Should the Council consider favorably of this request, the City Attorney will prepare an ordinance extending the program for an additional year and present it at the next City Council meeting for a vote. In the meantime, Staff will be available at Tuesday night's meeting to answer any questions from the Committee regarding this agenda item. Thursday, MarO S. 2012 nCOEM 7 City issues permits for 12-new singlewfa m fly homes in 201 Of,th c, ur were issued via city's B U I LD program, official t [[s a Iderme n By Testy Scott isstPance. of the cerAficate of occupancy on the ")nditioti that the cenjficate is Builders h-ave been issued 12 nr-Nv issued within one year from hudding single-farnily home perrnits since the permit approval; �. beginning of 2012, a City of Yorkville &Tfic municipal building irPtipa.ct fee 4¢ official told alderinen Trtcsday cvening. well be reducer] from $5,509 per - + IKryst' Barksdale-Nohle, the city's residential unit to �I,759 per Frsidential - directov of tornn-Punity develnpl cwc told unit; the City cuuncil`ti Fconnrnic 4he uit}' wdj rebate a portion of the Development Committee trist, of that building permit fee, up to $5,0W, with a number, four were as the resuh of the Tnaichirig contribution up tp $5,000 from city's lion- buil�ding inucntiuc program_ thr builderldev elope r, and present the � Aldermen voted to create the Buyers liomchuyer with a check for u tct ; �'` P +.�� opf Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount $16,00 upon istivance of Cher final lUll1 prixrarxr in January, in a lcid to cc rtificatc of occwpia1PC Spark hornebuilding an empty lDcs in the Borksdale.-Noble said that slte city's newer subdivisions. The program anticipates a Total of 60 1075 honies built is only available ro+the first 30 nexw home in 201Z, but said that 15 a CL)nServitive buitd�]P)g pFerrmi5. VArnati_ Accorrlitkg to the oily, the prgi-r•.tai7 TYvrtn I)Ubajsi�, t \cj:uti4'4, lire c:tpi: �r>If • ctitftrw the tsillc3suinr hsPtft}, the Y,�rkvilTet7i�+faiac. let° �trnesrbt �+ -PAymearlt nr budding -permit and U>ipCrration, ;*"PA. 113 IrttVitg,Lhar avr .. imprac;t fees will b+ dflAyed uKil the ca_n rcak r06tliis"ye r H Make' your reservation. for Easter &12-r=Express Yorkville Mayor Gary Galin-ski presented the first btrilclln perm l l5suBd unclear CYCY the City's BUILt) (Bisyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount) program to' Christy Bartlett at last Week's City Council m ling, She plane to build a There's. still time to make year Broadway, All parrieipianis will meet at sirtgle family Borne al 378 Bertram Drive in the Bristol bay Subdivision. rest-i— n atio and hop aboaril Lbc the Nictra s[AO in at 8 a.m. Metra passes Participants can delay payment of building permit and impact fees tPntll the 'c7rlcvilTa Parks antl r eCre3ticfn 3 alter WilI mat lrc ac:tcpicd for thif trip. issuance of a cerfffi:ate u. occupajCy impact fees are reduced from $5,509 E—, -Lxpr on Saturday,March 3T. The te-e is STll For residents. 512 for, to$1,759. Yno will have a snack and drink non-residents. For more infGrIlratlon or awhile you travci it) Naperville to hunt to register, mil Yorkville's Parks and kx e-98s and visit wish the Easter Recreation office at 630-553-2582 or go Bunt y• The trip boards and rewnm to online ttt v+ww.yorkvi[[c:_il,us• A urora',�Wtni Frain Stai1otP.233 Nardi r 16 RECORD Thursday,July 12. 2012 r New- home buying,. building program deemed success 0 0 BUILD incentive spurred 24 permits issued since approval in January By Tony Scott ,progrank ill 1witiary, who said it was Chris Funkhouscr SAid he's nuticecl an 1i11ing ill 10ts,that have N&n Froblems ftwr Trost likely the rttarket th;wt caused the lip ward trend in the ciiy`�.rho[nebui Id! g. the city, nui.mloce complaints, We creed Aftcr only six months, the city of iirc-rlvase in building, nevi the prLignim. "I would like to anribute it io the jo inove this forward. it's M)rkink_Why Yc,rhv'I11e"s BUILT) hornebuilding "It',, env belief drat would happen program." he said, Slop rt��tiv " incentive program has been declared a anyway",he said. LLUry Kot .said tlic program also Pity° Administrator Rare Olson %,,id thk. sitc_ress,and wost alderhFren said Tuesday Howvewer. roost of the aiderrrmen, helped creine jobs in the construction builders and blAyers fill out surveyi fiar atcy'd like to se-e it continue, inJading Rtxsa; Spcars, wvhe voted field. tlht° c ity°, and rhrit he's becr7 totd -l'lte. Buvem cif Undeveloped Infill Lot against the ria osal in January, declared "This leas been a bi-:sut:cess." lie said. anecdotally tr bLritders drat tale incentive. � p �' R p r y° y' i Discount,or BUILD, program %vas tried it a strccees. Spears praised BarksdAe- Kol also said iniplcilirn ing the ww°tirkc. w with :-5vccess in Miinooka last year and N able for 'hringing the prograrti fonv;ard, program at as better than doiit g nothing. Mivhaiel FtamiILon of Fullc H4irnc4 aide, was approved by awC YorkvilJc C"iik� even thou-h she said she wwaws skeptical "Orrc cif the inrirngihles here is the praised the prow-atn, stating thut lie has Council in a split 5-3 Votu in January`, of'[lie larngram a[first. pc�:sitive publicity that this has bruLig 5t to seen buyers considering Etaralcing_ rat the program had two major incentives 1 wvoidd like to thank Kry's.ti for the C ily of Yorkv°illu,' hr salt!, `We' a neighboring towvn% but chow-ing for homebuilticr:� and havers of ntm, initialin- this Program. even though i nol rifting !back and jum %vahitina for the Yorkville h&causu of thir program, l construction,single-tarnily homes,, opposed it-" ears said. mark-el 1, turn itself around- We're This prtar.rarn has worked,"he said. -To assist the builder or developet- madding) an eti'awrl ti) Lurn it:1r0u11d. WC're dAbuilding Pfimet seed impact fees will bc. H Class of i cCtae as L1we 'sirri� ai cerilC lC�tte 171 oca:irpatrcy is issue~i are a li LntC, in!stead of prtar iwi 'Big I f Sery ing'ng' offers seeks classmates� p ol a 3 , w l6c� L . red 1nxper.L0nx, althLLUgh most are done irr volunteer r help from teens T7 35diville High �,clatxhl class is Ire�use. at.cc,rrling to >3arksdaibe-f�nkile, 19"77 35111 t�etrniratz Committee is 1`Ire rriuniCipaJ Iauilding fee wv011ld the. looking for the following classmates. reduced frorn 55,509 per arrit to 51,759 Right rii)w° Kendall Courit+ residents, the prx,Ject and included itt i.lte publicity - Tana Hazard, I.!,,a Knell, Karee per unit as well. according to Muksdalc- local 'businos�;es, churches and vr�uth featured on the website ;end Fauc:hook (Angell) 't-horyipson. Mark. Carroll, Noble's memo. a-Ci t shirts.and banners Ft the kickoff uvcrpCrClt3 banding together land pareliaring � av oriel c to dnC hloQlcz !sari}° celebration. Kin Sandy Kathy l rUrnahs[akClaucF; •Alst�, the kac+rnClauver ww�i11 rcceiw`�e a S 10--spend L jtC day y (Walley) 1 NO rcNw of kip to S5,[}00 as wwell a& a cJraer service rcr-er.s tai ar community. Sherwin Williams illi card Lakeview flrill are Keller,, Rick t s, Sherri 1'ihuck inatthing cororibntitrri of u to 55,000 t' a the first two sponsors for this event- from the builder rardeyeluper,, Tlrev car 11 it"'[7hr Big Day of Serving." Church❑s and youth groups who want Mark kice, I ony Man8o, snit Aridreai The rr� ram was limited to 30 haarne5 I�ens�ill C`i,unti", ni1Ce rile Fastest to be it part of Tht} Big Day of Serving LFCu rlatct Clark. Cu a,lc (Amend Giu❑nzlL4r, p gFO egos COUrtty an Arnr*rica. n1iw has the s b n+i 9 d S i g n u iw or 12 nionths to see. hu%k O'fcc:tik`c it k, a iligltCwt raw of f�wr wl�,r:ure in. Anierit°�, p 630-'768-8102, or Patti (Cut_singer) lirrhir scr gCStcd by Alderman Carlo ww°vw°wv.ihr bigclalyofser +frig cxwafit. N,g;inil,630-552-8(142,.with i nformia t ion. Colosimo al the time. The Big iyuy of serving can bring help Iti the many organizatirwns and families l4r}Sli BarJc dale-(w!c}hie. [ate 4ir}`s whew are struggling Or httVC ntw Ogle to community devt:lL:apnhcnt direcrtar, -.iid }rclp [hem a[l the awhile preparing teens the city' lead received 24 building, perwir for a life of service w send bringing r ryie applications via rile € IlLit prr,Qrsm $s community closer rovether, of Tuesday, Dot! Iv ww°hal she re>"erred to fir, you knraww+ sc:rrrcone who ecrulr! • as "ei+a vcrl land resfs[anse t. oche henefit fra m so me community iervice?It Open Door golf outing set C WrnC buyers and ,ar the slat asked d the may be an i�rgani.tide n who jusr doesn't hcwmchuilder eoannrunrt3`." dirt ill CC! Lh:ar have the budget or manpower to put the City Council. a¢tpre.7w`e C.wti°nti er the twagethCr . play ser ar a part. landscape a for July 2 t Edgebrook program to allriww° for aricaflrcr 30 peEnwirs CDMI- init�� center or clean tip a vacant nr until Jun of 2013. ww�hichever comes aril Many twrganizatis�ns have last farmfunding, In [Lata1, BiirlrsL�ale-hlraUlC said, the cis#` � gr:inl�; aarrtE Staff. 1;r rtatry bt a Area resitl,urat and 4ttr'41nc�ti4es are with .�c`rarrtirhent:il brraikfast ba*ginrrirrg al seni`7r ciiiten whi3 needs a frc5nt prararlt invited to i<atfat:rkene thrr )l OS U;atr' 6:30 a.rtr. The cuss fair a' M gokf. earl. e issued 131 wina�a=-r=hrtirl; fat,rrrti r;�P.iircd t,r a Single parent whin has lotto Tw�etrsre4 at t�pen Dohir'S ?41r1i annual continental tircakFasi, and a1Ll CapanL'b permits (br+tta Lill is am non�F!['ll,f sl ;itA aril! needs a house scraped and BOW. iitrlrnL°:s Mernarial 4 ci1F Owing lunch is $70. 'l`17s: PM Flight will kick, ww latch is nearly Lltn Scene acre cal r4.4 r painred, can �'bredneSddy°- R ly 25 at Edgebrou Gaff at I P.m. anal the cost o1 Fry in Iuder chat wwf issued clueing the eniirz ealel:dar I'll re u sl Ihek for iii err anjxatiort car C..i,utrtr3 Club. Partici cats ore golf. c=art, and Al �s mil`s Jurach y Car[al'2011. q �: la . � � la it p. Becimse cal` the amount of unit tots faniikv ir" your neighborhood, :tfrply ot, ertC0L1T L�=¢d to remcmber tan stcreL cede (beginning at 1 !:30 a;-rrij. With the. ling at wwa wti-hiserL,s .erg ta4 c° jc,J-log r�11 zmd handshake w this bcst hall srrtrzrataJe :wddiiacan 'of the Lexington evening �.encrited. arksdzlle NuthJc srtid rise city hlse ]iii: Day of SLrving button or enwail and 9hl�rgtrtt~dirt t?w•t•rit, b snyuet dinner Ira°either (brine. the room �ancratrri lr� ;idditl�+nay .�00,C1d9C1 in �crh°:ttrlt wttl?t?` rrt:iiL.cr�m sir call f3ti1- The .AM Flight will kirk-oft itt-1 a.nt., cosy is Shy par person, rewcrtue. SIEe said 114 prli earn d,,cs rsiar 1,5_* ,#a. ry t. 1ft5, Cc,rnp9irr�cmary� vemge .ireavailablL• use _11 c[�x!lttrs IS sly. l'eells Wdt It d ittg the vmrk They from Ruin RunticrS 13uClai w.`iitd 1V omn's "There saFun Ic, awe a are king ii led w;-ill be L by riduh who nrr seek vendors bfLveriwe_ catis. Atxo includi&cl ;rte fcyur filar gttjcraJ fund raw grog=are Iwoirar ia5ecl volunwering, their plannin, ahilikaes, complimentary beverage holes; the tip Shiplaw rL [lie c`i[y + l5tirlian rrP tar kni-1w1mi�e, and supl!rvision to %howw' rare r fall craft 111 tyflL,ww°er Club, tJtie C'twilsin Clot,, the So,tDeb wwfi,ch Is +a raatcf tthC to netw to cis seep two step what to do. It vou're a Crti;en Mill Speikea7 y, and Drank Nitti--s htareiehuytr� ns pzri Lie the t3>;11;t_L7 Parent lLaokina. li! tL:ac !art,=ordin's incenhive.' �hc ;wrrrte. "Ili � h your rims the Speakea.&y, arnpau1rtartt:c r i O inu back- tai' helping show Sept. I Sponsorshrps are {available: for tral.kto, the fiends prowled to the tho%,e in need in Lha"II c_Irnniunj1V, t,f p4�rcli;ase, ranging in Price rt m ?5 lrw yitwn7thuwc'r gat tinit L,I" Jiripl tj{wta$sar,c, Clung Lhk'�`aly frOm wideu gainew and TV fire Yorkvilit: Junior wJ,cimcn':; (Tula T3•5tH) -Sl]0nsar:ihips Of ?Sit Lwr retiree rare essentially a parilul rerund rd' rlrc for s day-, cwt f[l: a ww'av tin keoluntcer is looking for veri ors for their 1716 wvi11 haw;°c prominent srgnage at the cw.nt. lwuilditr,g perrnit fee from the leagellim A.41w y°om keel. Bill r)ut a annual fall craft rind vendor shown to eat' All spons.ons wi'iEf be named in the Open rleVt:10Ptr/bL1i1dCF T'fie!>r l unds are held volunteer :a p I,l i c a t i ra n at held Sarurd3y, Snpl. t, fram 9 ii.m. to 4 Decor Newsleiter, the banquet program, ill a separate eSc:roly accoum tiw°Ia cli j4 runt www.Iai-5 rra,ssv;rwrg err c'sll 63{}..55:1-7335. p.m-. in Tmviw Square Park ern ftrmte-l7 and in tire. local riewspaNrs parr ill the revenue collcrted faun real c,�4a.. l05. in 'YL�ri Yorkville. Open !?tsar lien ebilatatitm tenter olkir et�ares. ing. riuscd. n�a taxpayer 'Flhls is an outdoor event, hell! rain car Provides a wide variety of programs to +Ic�llrirs are heir trs4aJ to Cinrinciall} if Vaiu would like tt, help make this adults who have such dew'cica n suppor1t the Bi.JILD prour:na, ,is ii i5 w I- e c°unr pom ibl by rlaanatin 3 antis or shine.iJsacalh spaces ccas4 fy35 l'crr rr 1`h , €h ienral titaidctl." suRplics lift nails arts -llau ds rs. 12 foot.square: space until Aug. t-Afler disabilities cab mental relarda ion. ;atheism, dihmpsters, landscaping supplitis, hirich dial, the to!�t is 5- Tiir. d.cadline to Down's syndroalte, veret,rtil ;psulsy. :and I ot. r flhr our volunteer %orkers on Sept. 15. sign up is Aug. 17, other cl abilitic.s. All mangy- ratsrrrf from sigma rI, banners si) urluji[ccrs For inor+e inforritation or an thi rtincl r;wir:er will tw channelciJ info 'We're making an - effort to turn it around' knrFwv lips ualil programs.. This, p ww�`§Seel t �cw, visit k4waw.lttaa:-rcisa.rwr� fear. a Ircation, cs�nla�et "f'aaresa at tS:�CI-BS=I- � ,' Y I� � year Open Dc,cir t=erse of IhL wlweljiieti ran Ihi; CIq NPunsoryhip rrpticans, email 0877, ext. 3, or ernail wall oral tv rili.w uveFSI30.XI0 ihrough kiwi edi:a:n4aol,vurn for mare sNcial events. grants, and donations- Jr,, Suss AILJeriniii*° t�;ccrrga: Ciit-r}ra jneC�jrefaJasst,r: c�,,rn or c'rill 74DyS-?i3�4- Persons intcresti•tl in sponsoring rye Jr., who voted agailist implenlejwting the 8721 Bus, nes in, tan ba: affiliated with irrfurrmaLiun, golfing should este pin s f€�° Open r 1D or Rehabilitation Ctmicr, 405 S. 1 lk>� these kTC? WLJ12 SL, -Sandwich. IL 611545. Purl hasec may also be made oakane al Amish " a abler" Open L oe,'s wvbsae: wvti+ w,ndr4.ofg. inquirii;s FIRly be d1P trd TO Caiidi ]Maker Happy - atJ 815-7116-M(ih, ma. ??L Y - Birthd%Ab _`_- � ,� Public Notice 1 Th,e VIIIa [of hlillba❑❑rc tma • - hams a�if'inarinv '01.7-.1003 CLASSIFIED Line Ads sail l Wng th,p pmvailing rate 'Monday 5 P.M. i oI wwrsam tar grrs[ivin X to 3aF STERV EN the same as Ihcast� I�1£anGalt courity as distormined by Olfa Classified Illlrrols Drrparra'ameril ul L,ati±r iltarpta��r Ads July[ 1 and Iiie State d Illinois as ❑3 Display June une 21312. Anyono wishing r❑ y 5 p.m. lrtspeM ih ii Ordinajv4 relay d❑ It a proof 15. r so al B455 Fax Raver 37w by ar, noaded a. pLaintmimt oNy. RYA } PAY SCHE3..L Friday at M[raran Jul 271' 'Villar�ge cal I~llitlti lank tCCr?•2�3wSr. I BuYn of the Week: — — ---- -- Monda y at Noon di B * 0 sl di si N Illinois towns eat fees in a laid to lure builders and buyers, spurring t a sense of optimism on growth and rolling out welcome mats to di do di fo in be ti; Y( ` d4 -� d. ur Ru — •Sot �-- e �l'Y .. v_ • a ._.mac;,� - - - - :•IIR _. HEATHER CHARLES/rRYBUNE PHOTO Yorkvllle's city council will vote next week on whether to extend a program begun In January that reduced builder fees and rewards home buyers. FIVE TOWNS THAT BY MARY ELLEN POD M OLIR l 'T'ribune reporter CUT BUILDING FEES It has been a tong two years since the 2410 census proclaimed x A N E ()u PAC=E Kendall County the fastest-growing county in the nation,and today, Co. C p. signs of runaway growth on the fringes of the Chicago area are hard ,._s� r) .._. Cfilcago to find. swgar But they are startin g to rout s p again as municipalities roll out a e rove welcome mat for developers,builders and new residents. .... r Years after raking in large building fees for new-home P r r. a' ,,' construction,local governments are slashing them by as much as 5o Ti Yorkville ` percent. And a growing number are offering cash — as much as 'n ox �� $10,000—to homebuyers to entice them to buy a new home in their lei CO. community,Fitting one town against another. C1 t t S rewood Such incentives are starting to show promise. _ Yorkville, which last year recorded 43 home starts, has already a �" I logged 42 starts this year.A Toledo Ohio homebuilder is interested ' Mlnooka� WILL in taking over a mothballed Sugar Grove subdivision,but only if the ss Co. building fees are cut in half,and its under discussion.Kane County is ( MI 10 debating whether to continue the separate county road fees it GRUnnv IBLINN charge.s builders. rl l Please turn to!fie n CI 11118nois towns cut fees to lure homebuilders, buyers Continued from Pager i lashing fees Toledo has approached the vill about its desire to No one is predicting a Southwest suburban Shorewood has reduced the fees it puracse the 67 remaining return to housings halcyon charges homebuilders in hopes of spurring development. developed lots in Sugar days, when builders were �'. -°-^= I Grove's Prairie Glen sub- practically lined up,check- -� Previous oust amount pm"rce change Fr. amount amount chance division, but only if the books in hand, to secure -- ge Building permit* $1.20 $1 _17 villa board agrees to cut annexation agreements and .- . ........ ............... ........ ............... ......... ...................... the current fees in half waterline tie-ins. But the water tap + $3,834 $2,940 ""That number is pretty results of various efforts are f# ... ._........_ ... .................................. important to us;'said Doug generating a sense of some- Sewer tap $3,834 $2,940 Wagner,Republic's director thing not felt here for a long . .........' *.*. . . ® of residential development. Park donation $89.323.05 $46,67 6 Richard Young, Sugar tinge:optirrtism. ....... .......................... _ _ .._ ...._ .... . . g g "The people who do �� Schooldonatlon** $8a,3P3.05 $46676 Grove's community dev$1- come out, they're serious ;I _ .......... ......... _............_.... ...._.............................._............... opment director, says the buyers;" said Aladdin leas- Capital improvefnent $3,987 $1,400 � request will be "a test case Eger square foot **per sere;differs by subdivlson r, sat,vice president of Mead- ' SQt1RCE;Village of Shorewood TRIBUNE for the village` owbrook Homes Inc., McCue Builders hasn't which has restarted con- gotten any breaks from Os- struction on a subdivision in HEATHER CHARLES/rR1BUNE PHOTO Yorkville borrowed the saw those dollars rolling in, wego for the lots it owns Minooka. Christy Bartlett was the first Yorkville resident to receive a buyer rebate idea from Mi- you wanted to keep it' there,so they sit untouched. Consumers are seeking $10,000 check for the new house she moved to last month. nooka, which borrowed it In March, Shorewood's But in Yorkville,Moue just to capitalize on low mort- firom nearby Manhattan.Its village board approved a signed a contract to buy 20 gage interest rates and resident on roads, park fa- steady and controlled success in Minooka has 36-month reduction in lots in two subdivisions; in lower home prices. From cilities and schools.Fees in growth;'said Itrysti Barks- enabled Meadowbrook builder fees,to a maximum addition to the homes al- April through June, build- some far-flung communi- dale-Noble, Yorkville's di- Homes to start building of sx 000, and delayed ready under construction ing began on slightly more ties can be as much as rector of community devel- roads for a second phase of when the payments are due. "other builders think I'm than 1,000 homes in the $30,090 for a home, and opment"This is just a shot what will eventually be- "Back in the heyday,mu- crazy to stay in Yorkville 12-county Chicago area,an builders in the past didn't in the arm.- come a 379-lot subdivision. nicipalities were really in because there are so many increase of 33 percent from complain, because they Christy Bartlett is among "Success breeds success the drivers seat," Raumella vacant lots," said compare a year ago, according to couldn't construct houses Yorkville's newest residents to some degree,' Nassar said. "They could essen- owner Billy McCue. "I tell housing research firm Met- fast enough. and was the first to receive a said. 'Tveryone looks kind tially dictate fees with no them Yorkville is commit® rostudy Meanwhile, sec- Yorkville's city council $1o,000 check for the new of bug-eyed at the activity. real basis for what the fees ted to working with us!' ond-quarter closings rose will vote next week on Douse she and her partner The village gets a resident,a were for. Now, these mu- Plainfield cut its fees in 13.4 percent year over year, whether to extend a pro- moved into last month. lifetime taxpayer, it builds nicipalities that were once 2010, but the village isn't to 066 homes. gram started in January that The Crest Hill residents up the empty shopping cen- overburdened with core- willing to hurt itself finan- "The timing is absolutely caught the attention of wanted a bigger house,and ters eventually and the buy- struction are starving for it" cially to grab builders away right,"'said Lance R.arnella, builders and buyers. although the cash incentive er gets$10,000." Builders large and small from nearby towns, said director of consulting for under it,builder fees are wasn't the deciding factor in Cutting fees and offering know it village planner Michael Metrostudy's Midwest re- reduced, the city gives as their purchase,the program incentives has required a "Every municipality we Garrigan. gion. "once momentum much as$5,000 to the buyer helped pay for some extras dramatic shift in thinking build in, we are at least Also, the community is starts again, (communities) and the builder matches and boosted their confi- by municipal governments, asking the question to re- trying to keep the new will eventually be back in that amount Some builders Bence about buying in York- which once turned a deaf duce fees; said Maria Wil- activity in perspective.Last the driver's seat, but it'll are increasing the price of ville. Several homes are ear to builders' complaints helm,vice president of sales year, Plainfield issued 58 take several years. They the home to cover their under construction hear about fee structures. for the Illinois division of building permits.This year, need to compete for build- contribution. them,including next door. During the boom times, Pulte Homes, the most ac- it is on pace to issue 100.In ers and developers right The program was set to '"When I was looking, Shorewood increased its tive builder in the Chicago 2003, Plainfield issued al- now" end in January,but since 24 there was nothing going building fees to as much as area during the past year. most 1,500 building per- In addition to the fees of the 30 incentive packages on," Bartlett said. "I don't $25,000 a home. Three years ago, Sugar nuts. associated with building are spoken for, the city think there were any homes "It was like a shark feed- Grove lowered builder fees '%Ve have a long way to permits and tying in to might extend it to an addi- in the process.It was kind of ing frenzy;'recalled Shore- by$5,000,to an average of go;'Garrigan sai& utilities,builders pay addi- tional 30 homes. scary. (Now) I see that wood Mayor Rick Chap- $24,000,but it hasn't gener- tional sums to cover the 'We do see the market people are buying, and man. "Once you smelled ated much activity. Repub- mepodmolik@tribune.com projected impact of a new going in a direction of more they're buying here" that blood in the water and lic Development Corp. of Twitter @mepodmolik Illinois towns cut fees in bid to lure builders,buyers - chicagotribune.com Page 1 of 3 www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0719-battling-incentives--20120719,0,4611677.story chicagotribune.com Illinois towns cut fees in bid to lure builders, buyers Sense of optimism on growth returning as welcome mats are rolled out By Mary Ellen Podmolik, Chicago Tribune reporter July 19, 2012 It has been a long two years since the 2010 census advertisement proclaimed Kendall County the fastest-growing county in the nation, and today, signs of runaway growth on the RYLAND HOMES fringes of the Chicago area are hard to find. 11 Communities in But they are starting to sprout again as municipalities r � roll out a welcome mat for developers,builders and new ;4 Plans residents. Priced from the $100's - $370's Years after raking in large building fees for new-home construction, local governments are slashing them by as much as 50 percent. And a growing number are offering lid 1y1IL CLICK HERE cash as much as $10,000 to homebuyers to entice them to buy a new home in their community,pitting one town against another. jam Such incentives are starting to show promise. Yorkville, which last year recorded 43 home starts, has already logged 42 starts this year. A Toledo, Ohio, homebuilder is interested in taking over a mothballed Sugar Grove subdivision, but only if the building fees are cut in half, and it's under discussion. Kane County is debating whether to continue the separate county road fees it charges builders. No one is predicting a return to housing's halcyon days, when builders were practically lined up, checkbooks in hand, to secure annexation agreements and waterline tie-ins. But the results of various efforts are generating a sense of something not felt here for a long time: optimism. "The people who do come out, they're serious buyers," said Aladdin Nassar, vice president of Meadowbrook Homes Inc., which has restarted construction on a subdivision in Minooka. Consumers are seeking to capitalize on low mortgage interest rates and lower home prices. From April through June,building began on slightly more than 1,000 homes in the 12-county Chicago area, an increase of 33 percent from a year ago, according to housing research firm Metrostudy. Meanwhile, second-quarter closings rose 13.4 percent year over year, to 966 homes. "The timing is absolutely right," said Lance Ramella, director of consulting for Metrostudy's Midwest region. "Once momentum starts again, (communities)will eventually be back in the driver's seat,but it'll http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0719-battling-incentives--20120719,0,345... 7/19/2012 Illinois towns cut fees in bid to lure builders,buyers - chicagotribune.com Page 2 of 3 take several years. They need to compete for builders and developers right now." In addition to the fees associated with building permits and tying in to utilities,builders pay additional sums to cover the projected impact of a new resident on roads,park facilities and schools. Fees in some far-flung communities can be as much as $30,000 for a home, and builders in the past didn't complain, because they couldn't construct houses fast enough. Yorkville's city council will vote next week on whether to extend a program started in January that caught the attention of builders and buyers. Under it, builder fees are reduced, the city gives as much as $5,000 to the buyer and the builder matches that amount. Some builders are increasing the price of the home to cover their contribution. The program was set to end in January, but since 24 of the 30 incentive packages are spoken for, the city might extend it to an additional 30 homes. "We do see the market going in a direction of more steady and controlled growth," said Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Yorkville's director of community development. "This is just a shot in the arm." Christy Bartlett is among Yorkville's newest residents and was the first to receive a $10,000 check for the new house she and her partner moved into last month. The Crest Hill residents wanted a bigger house, and although the cash incentive wasn't the deciding factor in their purchase, the program helped pay for some extras and boosted their confidence about buying in Yorkville. Several homes are under construction near them, including next door. "When I was looking, there was nothing going on," Bartlett said. "I don't think there were any homes in the process. It was kind of scary. (Now) I see that people are buying, and they're buying here." Yorkville borrowed the buyer rebate idea from Minooka, which borrowed it from nearby Manhattan. Its success in Minooka has enabled Meadowbrook Homes to start building roads for a second phase of what will eventually become a 379-lot subdivision. "Success breeds success to some degree,"Nassar said. "Everyone looks kind of bug-eyed at the activity. The village gets a resident, a lifetime taxpayer, it builds up the empty shopping centers eventually and the buyer gets $10,000." Cutting fees and offering incentives has required a dramatic shift in thinking by municipal governments, which once turned a deaf ear to builders' complaints about fee structures. During the boom times, Shorewood increased its building fees to as much as $25,000 a home. "It was like a shark feeding frenzy," recalled Shorewood Mayor Rick Chapman. "Once you smelled that blood in the water and saw those dollars rolling in, you wanted to keep it." In March, Shorewood's village board approved a 36-month reduction in builder fees, to a maximum of $14,000, and delayed when the payments are due. "Back in the heyday, municipalities were really in the drivers seat," Ramella said. "They could essentially dictate fees with no real basis for what the fees were for. Now, these municipalities that were http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0719-battling-incentives--20120719,0,345... 7/19/2012 Illinois towns cut fees in bid to lure builders,buyers - chicagotribune.com Page 3 of 3 once overburdened with construction are starving for it." Builders large and small know it. "Every municipality we build in, we are at least asking the question to reduce fees," said Maria Wilhelm, vice president of sales for the Illinois division of Pulte Homes, the most active builder in the Chicago area during the past year. Three years ago, Sugar Grove lowered builder fees by $5,000, to an average of$20,000, but it hasn't generated much activity. Republic Development Corp. of Toledo has approached the village about its desire to purchase the 67 remaining developed lots in Sugar Grove's Prairie Glen subdivision, but only if the village board agrees to cut the current fees in half. "That number is pretty important to us," said Doug Wagner, Republic's director of residential development. Richard Young, Sugar Grove's community development director, says the request will be "a test case for the village." McCue Builders hasn't gotten any breaks from Oswego for the lots it owns there, so they sit untouched. But in Yorkville, McCue just signed a contract to buy 20 lots in two subdivisions, in addition to the homes already under construction. "Other builders think I'm crazy to stay in Yorkville because there are so many vacant lots," said company owner Billy McCue. "I tell them Yorkville is committed to working with us." Plainfield cut its fees in 2010, but the village isn't willing to hurt itself financially to grab builders away from nearby towns, said village planner Michael Garrigan. Also, the community is trying to keep the new activity in perspective. Last year, Plainfield issued 58 building permits. This year, it is on pace to issue 100. In 2003, Plainfield issued almost 1,500 building permits. "We have a long way to go," Garrigan said. mepodmolik(a),tribune.com Twitter @mepodmolik Copyright© 2012, Chicago Tribune http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-0719-battling-incentives--20120719,0,345... 7/19/2012 Print Story Page 1 of 1 beaconnews Yorkville ready to extend home-buyer incentive By Steve Lord slord@strnedianetwork.com Last Modified: Jul 13,2012 02:23AM YORKVILLE–The city and local builders will continue to offer a$10,000 incentive to anyone who wants to build a new house here. Aldermen support extending the BUILD program,which offers the incentive,through June 2013. They will take a formal vote on the extension July 24,but a consensus of the City Council this week said they would approve it. The BUILD program began this year with the city setting aside a maximum of 30 building permits for it. Under the program,the city agrees to rebate back a portion of the building permit fee up to $5,000, and the builder agrees to match the $5,000 in payment to the homebuyer. The agreement is made at the time the building permit is issued; developers are not allowed to build spec houses as part of the program. The homebuyer gets the$10,000 check at the time the occupancy permit is issued. As of this week,the city had issued 24 of the allowable 30 permits for this year,with two more in the works, according to Krysti Barksdale-Noble,community development director. Noble said city officials still are awaiting results of a BUILD survey of each homebuyer,but said BUILD has resulted in more permits this year than all of last year. She also said the program has brought in an estimated $200,000 to the city,not to mention building jobs. The program also is working to fill in lots already platted in the city but not built on. Noble said that between 13 or 14 of the permits were pulled by Pulte, developers of several subdivisions in the city,including the unfinished Bristol Bay. The other permits were pulled by smaller, custom builders. Alderman Larry Kot,2nd Ward, called the program a"win-win situation."He said in addition to the money,jobs and new residents,the program also has given the city"positive publicity." "It says we're a progressive city,that we're not just sitting back and waiting for the market to change,"he said. Michael Hamilton,representing Pulte,told aldermen"the program has worked." "We've had people who were considering other communities come to Yorkville,"he said. Copyright©2012—Sun-Times Media,LLC http:/ibeaconnews.suntimes.com/news/13742694-418/yorkville-ready-to-extend-home-buy... 7/13/2012 rnn[ story Page I of 3 beaconnews Yorkville: $10,000 incentive for people to build, buy houses By Steve Lord slord@stmedianetwork.com Last Modified: Jan 12, 2012 07:54AM YORKVILLE--The city will be offering a financial incentive to entice people to build new homes in Yorkville during the next year. The program, narrowly approved by the City Council this week, will feature a $10,000 payment to new homeowners at the time they occupy the new house. The money will come from a fund that both the city and developers who take advantage of the program contribute to. The city's share for each home would be the amount paid for permit fees up to $5,000; the developer would match that. In addition, the city would have permit and impact fees paid at the time of the certificate of occupancy, rather than prior to construction. That would allow the builder flexibility to move forward with construction without incurring the fee up front. The city also is proposing a reduction in the current municipal building fee from $5,509 to $1,759. When the new homebuyer occupies the house, they receive a check for$10,000. City officials proposed the program to try to get some action going on the almost 9,000 platted but vacant lots throughout the city. Any developer in any subdivision can take advantage of the program. The program will be limited to 30 lots and to the next 12 months. City officials will review how the program worked after that to see if they should consider doing it for another year. Modeled on Minooka Yorkville officials got the idea for the program from the nearby village of Minooka, where a similar program worked for the past year. Minooka entered into a similar deal with Meadowbrook Homes Inc., developers of Arbor Lakes. Alladin Nassar, Meadowbrook Homes vice president, said the program was responsible for the developer building 49 new homes during the second half of 2010 and during 2011, after selling "a whopping zero homes"between 2008 and mid-2010. "Before then, we had sold about 80 homes a year,"he said. Nassar said his company also discounted prices, offering a four-bedroom, 2w-bath house for$169,900. http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/9953448-417/yorkville-10000-incentive-for-people-to-bu... 1/12/2012 rLI11L Jtury Page 2 of'3 With the program, the homebuyer ended up paying $159,900. Builder eyes Yorkville Nassar said his company is looking at some lots in two different Yorkville subdivisions. He said the program likely would work better in Yorkville,because Yorkville has better business infrastructure and demographics than Minooka. Nassar said his company likely would charge between $180,000 and $190,000 in Yorkville. "Yorkville has a lot of things going for it,"he said. Nassar said for the small, paper cost of permit fees, the city would gain new residents who spend money in town and support the businesses. They also will pay property taxes into the tax base. "You give us a little in permit fees upfront, but get the increased tax base, long-term," he said. The Yorkville council voted 5-3 in support of the program. The three dissenters were Aldermen Carlo Colosimo, George Gilson and Rose Spears. Gilson said the only things that will bring homebuilding back are markets, the economy and demographics. He said the city has"been stung"by deals offered to developers in the past. "All these deals struck in the past with developers have hurt us," he said. "The real developers, the solid ones, are positioning themselves now to be in a good position when the economy rebounds." `Got to do something' Another developer, Bill McCue, of McCue Builders, said the only way Yorkville can sustain and grow its business community is "through rooftops." He said the average house brings $160,000 to a community. "This is a long haul situation," he said. "You watch, fees are going to be dropping everywhere. This is going to be great for everybody." Lynn Dubajic, Yorkville Economic Development Corporation director, said this kind of stimulus program helps in marketing to retail businesses looking to locate in Yorkville. "1f we're not doing something out of the box, they will just look at the towns getting rooftops built," she said. Mayor Gary Golinski, along with five other aldermen, said the program would be a sign Yorkville is doing something. "We have too many vacant lots," said Alderman Marty Munns, 3rd Ward. "We've got to do something." Copyright 0 2012— Sun-Times Media, LLC http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/9953448-417/yorkville-I 0000-incentive-for-people-to-bu... 1/12/2012 Print Story Page 1 of 3 beaconnews Yorkville: $10,000 incentive for people to build, buy houses By Steve Lord slord@stmedianetwork.com Last Modified: Mar 24, 2012 11:41 PM YORKVILLE The city will be offering a financial incentive to entice people to build new homes in Yorkville during the next year. The program, narrowly approved by the City Council this week,will feature a $10,000 payment to new homeowners at the time they occupy the new house. The money will come from a fund that both the city and developers who take advantage of the program contribute to. The city's share for each home would be the amount paid for permit fees up to $5,000; the developer would match that. In addition, the city would have permit and impact fees paid at the time of the certificate of occupancy, rather than prior to construction. That would allow the builder flexibility to move forward with construction without incurring the fee up front. The city also is proposing a reduction in the current municipal building fee from $5,509 to $1,759. When the new homebuyer occupies the house, they receive a check for$10,000. City officials proposed the program to try to get some action going on the almost 9,000 platted but vacant lots throughout the city. Any developer in any subdivision can take advantage of the program. The program will be limited to 30 lots and to the next 12 months. City officials will review how the program worked after that to see if they should consider doing it for another year. Modeled on Minooka Yorkville officials got the idea for the program from the nearby village of Minooka, where a similar program worked for the past year. Minooka entered into a similar deal with Meadowbrook Homes Inc., developers of Arbor Lakes. Alladin Nassar, Meadowbrook Homes vice president, said the program was responsible for the developer building 49 new homes during the second half of 2010 and during 2011, after selling "a whopping zero homes"between 2008 and mid-2010. "Before then, we had sold about 80 homes a year,"he said. Nassar said his company also discounted prices, offering a four-bedroom, 2oe-bath house for$169,900. http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/9953448-418/yorkville-to-try-incentive-to-get-peop... 7/17/2012 Print Story Page 2 of 3 With the program, the homebuyer ended up paying $159,900. Builder eyes Yorkville Nassar said his company is looking at some lots in two different Yorkville subdivisions. He said the program likely would work better in Yorkville, because Yorkville has better business infrastructure and demographics than Minooka.Nassar said his company likely would charge between $180,000 and $190,000 in Yorkville. "Yorkville has a lot of things going for it,"he said. Nassar said for the small,paper cost of permit fees, the city would gain new residents who spend money in town and support the businesses. They also will pay property taxes into the tax base. "You give us a little in permit fees upfront, but get the increased tax base, long-term,"he said. The Yorkville council voted 5-3 in support of the program. The three dissenters were Aldermen Carlo Colosimo, George Gilson and Rose Spears. Gilson said the only things that will bring homebuilding back are markets, the economy and demographics. He said the city has "been stung"by deals offered to developers in the past. "All these deals struck in the past with developers have hurt us,"he said. "The real developers, the solid ones, are positioning themselves now to be in a good position when the economy rebounds." `Got to do something' Another developer, Bill McCue, of McCue Builders, said the only way Yorkville can sustain and grow its business community is "through rooftops."He said the average house brings $160,000 to a community. "This is a long haul situation,"he said. "You watch, fees are going to be dropping everywhere. This is going to be great for everybody." Lynn Dubajic, Yorkville Economic Development Corporation director, said this kind of stimulus program helps in marketing to retail businesses looking to locate in Yorkville. "If we're not doing something out of the box, they will just look at the towns getting rooftops built," she said. Mayor Gary Golinski, along with five other aldermen, said the program would be a sign Yorkville is doing something. "We have too many vacant lots," said Alderman Marty Munns, 3rd Ward. "We've got to do something." Copyright© 2012 Sun-Times Media, LLC http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/9953448-418/yorkville-to-try-incentive-to-get-peop... 7/17/2012 'F(RM 60560 1535102-28-13 42W 134P 6N CITY OF YORKVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 800 GAME FARM RD yORK\f111-E(I 3"3 Bringing you all the news of Kendall County Since 1864 In this issue: YHS girls' ll C 75¢ team beats Kendall County Dixon 60-26... ...see Sports Thursday, Dec. 6, 2012 John Shaw is Vol. 148 No. 49 new chairman ]RECORD 96 pages, 5 sections of Co. Board... Published at Yorkville IL 60560 ,,,see page 2 @Copyright 2012,Kendall County Record Inc ya Home building incentive program gets rave reviews Ilk 1 1 Mwti 11 1(rol,) d By Tony Scott 2009, 42 in 2010, and 43 in 2011, 1 according to the survey. The City of Yorkville's home building Barksdale-Noble said the city has so r x incentive program seems to be popular far issued 36 permits that qualify for the f,. with those who choose to use it, a city BUILD program since it started in official told aldermen Tuesday. January. Kgsti Barksdale-Noble, the city's "As part of the issuance process, we ♦ community development director, shared ask the homebuyers to complete a brief the results of a recent survey of those survey providing feedback on their who chose to build homes here in experience with the program. To date, Yorkville via the Buyers of Undeveloped we have received 23 completed surveys Infill Lot Discount (BUILD) program from those buyers," she said in her with the City Council's Economic memo. Development Committee. The city Of those surveyed, 42 percent said the Quality time with Santa: Arie Mejia, 19 months, daughter of Anna Meija of received 23 surveys back from the 50 BUILD program was "extremely Yorkville, has a chat with Santa Claus at the Lyon Farm's Christmas event distributed. influential"in their decision to buy a new Sunday. Visitors could take a hayride, try roasted chestnuts, view antiques and The City Council in July voted to home in Yorkville, with 25 percent visit with the big guy. Lyon Farm will be open with the same activities this extend the program for another 30 saying it was"very influential." Sunday, Dec. 9, from 1 to 4 p.m. at 7935 Route 71 in Yorkville. More photos in building permits or for one year, Most of the people surveyed said the Countywide section. (Record Photo by Joanne Pleskovieh) whichever occurred first. they'd heard about the program from • The program gave the following their builder (73 percent), while others Loaningmoney for Lisbon incentives for those applying for new said they read about it in the newspaper single family home permits, according to (14 percent), and others said they heard sewer not legal, county told the city website about t from a friend (9 percent). Four m •Payent of building permit and percent said they read about it on the impact fees will be delayed until the -city's website. Has no authority to lend money issuance of the certificate of occupancy Of those surveyed, 91 percent said on the condition that the .certificate is they'd recommend the program to a - issued within one year from building friend. Most of those surveyed said they By Matt Sehury you to do that. I wish I had better news permit approval; planned to spend their incentive money for you. 1 know this is not a popular -The municipal building impact fee on furniture or other goods (42 percent), The Kendall County Board can lend answer to tell you." will be reduced from $5,509 per while others said they would save and money to the Village of Lisbon to build a Weis explained that under state statute residential unit to $1,759 per residential invest it (24 percent), use it toward debt wastewater treatment plant but it won't the county doesn't have the authority to unit; or other bills (17 percent), or"other" (17 be legal, County State's Attorney Eric lend the money. -The city will rebate a portion of the percent). Weis told the board Tuesday night. He added that if the board decided to building permit fee, up to $5,000 with a During a discussion on the survey, Weis said he and Assistant State's lend the money to Lisbon anyway he matching contribution up to $5,000 from Alderman Carlo Colosimo said one of jAttorney David Berault have been couldn't stop them but there would be no the builder/developer, and present the the questions was worded in a confusing working on the agreement with the far °uarantee a contract cold provide that the homebuyer with a check for up to way. The question was: "Do you agree southern Kendall County town and board would get it's money back. $10,000 upon issuance of the final you would have moved to Yorkville this haven't found legal way for the county to "I don't have a good legal recourse to certificate of occupancy. year if not for the B.U.I.L.D. program?" the funds the village requested in get it back from them if they don't pay The city has issued 69 total building Barksdale-Noble agreed, and said city October. it,"Weis said. permits for single family homes so far staff had contacted two random "We have come to the conclusion that Lisbon had come before the County this year, which is more than the respondents to ensure that they meant there is no good way for us to do this," Board two months ago asking for a loan individual totals of the past three years: that they moved to Yorkville because of Weis said. `7 cannot find a legal way for continued on page 3 there were 56 such permits issued in the program. s 3x Former State's ! Attorney now ' chief judge of wY new circuit: 1 a 1W ..- Judge Timothy J. McCann of Oswego, second from left, a former ' Kendall County State's Attorney, was unanimously elected chief judge of the new 23rd Judicial v Circuit Monday in Yorkville by his - fellow judges in the circuit, which includes Kendall and DeKalb coun- ties. From left are Judges Melissa a Barnhart, Robert Pilmer,Thomas Doherty, Robbin Stocked:and Ronald Matekaitis. (Record Photo ° by Eric Miller) r r / ; 11 � • Bringing°you all fhe news of Kendall County Since 1864 1 y � ` �yva «�"'� yx"s5 � `� - • - • . - • • v ' 111 . • • ' - • • . y4''yx"^`��° ` � ' +. v • • . . • • • _ _ • • • • e • 111 v - • • . • • • dill Pill dm g� • • • • . • .• . ' r • - • • - • • - • - • • • - • . Pill lgN ,: � ,zxt`�; • \ , / • • • • - • ' 1 111 • ' 1 111 ,- • ' • - \ • • ' . • • 1 • 1 1 � 1 1 (-i A -r#*6r x _ _ - _ _ _ • 111 • • v - _ t �;�. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • . • . . '< . .• raw • • • . r • ' • - • - . - v 611P, • \ �J • A • 1 . • ¢yn • . _ • - • • A • • • 1 • . J PP _ • -• , - • • • . . 1 • - • - • • • - MEMO= PPti • • • . • • • _ • • • - ' _ • • - • • • • • • • ' • r - • ' • • • • ' • • - • ' • • • • • v ` - -.: a.....�,..- .— ;" .3 PP `Y: 1 �5 1 ,L a ,- IV 7i PP VP! Iy Inn 21W 1.6 • 1 1 1 • 1 1 6 e y - " � Yg7 • • r� ! . �'ll r `� t • • 1 ��' L.v • - • . • • \ r ..r'�•'"qR�' � v u ' • ..; °�xr,. .r iYSai',. ,r, qd: ,.'�i ` �'dt „"v„ i'�c��Gr"�'vt�r<a .j, � ^,a"""�t£ �' Thursday, Jan. 12, 2012 RECORD 7 Riemenschneider a New Construction County files suit to sieze • Service Upgrades Electr�e _ Electric,, Inc. • Remodeling$ 60,000 from traffic stop Residential �° _ • Bucket Truck Service By Matt SChUry According to the court case, the cash _ y • Repairs was transported or attempted to be - Illinois State Police seized one of the transported knowing or having reason to y��' largest amounts of money in Kendal] - -�I g Y know that the financial: transaction is �` County's history in November. designed to avoid a transaction report Licensed * Bonded Insured . State Police seized $63 ,630 in cash requirement under federal law." following the arrest of Alexander Shaia; The cash' was seized under the drug Verne Riemenschneider • Scott Riemenschneider 25, of Pam Street, Eugene, Ore as he was asset forfeiture 'laws, according - to traveling west bound on I-80 near Assistant State's Attorney Frank Gorup, L�O��S�G Minooka. He — was charged with because there was suspicion the money 6 _ V possession of a controlled-`sdbstance, I8 may have been-tied'to dnigs: . ' capsules of Adderall, on Nov. 7. "A forfeiture arose against the U.S. 1212 Badger St. , Box 491 , Yorkville, IL 60560 A complaint of forfeiture was filed in currency," Pencyla said. Basically any Kendall County Court in addition to amount that is done in this manner, as criminal drug charges. Shaia posted long as it fits the requirements of the � $50,000 bond. statute, would be considered a forfeitable "Only one person (Shaia) has been . amount. 'It doesn't change ' by the charged," Assistant State's Attorneys amount ,, Try before you buy , Nemura Pencyla said e , AccordlrN W. ",_ b4w"If 1P� . t Two other individuals in the car with wins the cavt case th ney vY L e `' Shaia were not chazged sp7aYlainnng the goTe )�tnl a,g,ehies"� k ,� Io/gam FREE W E E-W '11"It's the largest one from last year tiue f} e, case'15 'sc eYlu1 d o �6bio�lghF to, its definitely not the largest one ever," court on ;~eb. �S f6r a �atus update. — R- Pencyla said. - City home building incentive ,J LOA continued from page one - - a house in a community, they bring . tax - "If we're not doing something that's revenue and other benefits. out of the box to stimulate residential "To sit there and do nothing, 50 years development and additional rooftops in from now you're gonna be right where our town, many retailers will just check you are today," he said. "Every town is us off the list and not consider us for going to be dropping their permit (fees); N FREE SESSION with a future locationsnd'a she said. this is the long-haul:" p T PER[ON tIL Tp /L ' ILI Cp ' Bill McCue, a homebuilder who lives McCue also noted the other impacts of �{ GIIJJ / 1 1 Rf 1 NER in Bristol , said he supported the program . the lack of home building in the - /`�P J Learn your FITNESS SCORE and find'out`your and would participate in it. - community, such as construction-related s4 fimew level. eet on a workonL plan!(6100 vane) it "The only way you'll bring money to firms going out of business. Hurry; valid for fi st too neNV membe s Yorkville is through rooftops," he said. "This is gonna be great for w , ,e Union,wMU nkrubwha, mm cad Imo„„,„sand,,^;, ,,omm„ McCue said when a person buys a everybody;" he said of the program.. yhmlm•� ^^� •,Ctl ti NN b.aunr�r 'anatanNI ' 7 mm SrvP fM ssLbe ha u 171 'EM R E - W D e • _°' LOYALTY HAS ITS REWARDS w CERTIFIED YOUR UPTO 51,00D IN OWNER LOYALTY C kSnf WITH MOST OTHER OFFERS ! CHEVROLET C31:lICK GMC N,. $ 250 To 0 0 APR OWNER + FOR 72 z LOYALTY " r MONTHS ® IA S H ' ON SELECT MODELS IT0MRM002 WINDSTAR LX $4988 . + 2006 CHRYSLER PT CRUISER $6,988 NEW 2011 GMC NEW 2011 GMC AUTO, A"#4087-___.........-...._.......--.........._............. _-.- e 20i�6 CHRRIYSL LTERRR TOWN &COUNTRY SIERRA SIERRA EXT CAB _ $99ss REG CAB W/T WD SLE Z-71 , 2008 CHEVY COBALT $9,988 I Auto. Air,Trailering Suspensioni #387 LIST: 522,715 PowerTech Package,VIII LIST: a36,310 AUTO, AIR, CERTIFIED #4025.- ._....- ..-_- 111 111 2004 CADILLAC CTS LUXURY $l8 088 $29 2 3 AU , MR. 5UNR00F#4049....................._._-..-_--..._-$11,288 r $2q,2 ;;" , 2006 GMC 1500 CREW CAB 4x4 SLE M0 SEE 114095..-._.-.._.--.._.--__-.--_-_..--._L _. SLIS VMH FULL SHOWCPRLOE WIC4AB. 4x4 $15,988 •zX;l '.f " I TOTAL VAWEFOR 2011 SIERRA WITH 2007 SATURN OUTLOOK AWO $16388 ' ,':. .• " . . '�� "" " POWERTECH .nuro, aR, cERRHm #a9as............... __. , � #' I I •, �00 WORK FORD F350 SUPER DUTY X.. WORK $16,8$8 r r TRUCK;4X4, DIESEL#a092_..--._.. 4.. - . ...,w 2007 GMC YUKON SIT 4X4 NEW2012 GMC , LOADED!#39aR_.- _..-_--.._-----------------_ _ .$19,988 ; ACA DIA Wth w, NEW 2011 GMC 2008 GMC ACADIA SIT FWD $23 988 sLE zsMPDHw lei TERRAIN 2000 HONDA ODYSSEY TOURING Rlue[ootM1 Rear Camel. .' o Remote start! *29 $2ne8w BluetL35,890 SLE2 32MPGXwY SUNROOF. REAR.ENr SYBTEM, NAVI184094- ._. . 4 HOME OF THE SMALL Buemoth, RearComeal 2008 CHEVY TRAVERSE IT $$2,212 . + TIMID SALESMAN! ° ' 2] AWD:LE4111ER, SUNROOF, NAVI! #6075 _....-........._... . $2.5,488 `; LIST: 627,110 2008 BUICK ENCLAVE CXL AWO pQ ' • • 1 . • ' . • 1 ' ' , • , �� $25,L109 . NAVY, REAR ENTERTAINMENT, CERTIFIED! .........$27,288':. 2 006 CHEVY AVALANCHE LIZ O #4W6 $29 288 CREW CAB. LEATHER! _._.___.-.-.- .-.-_ -.-._.... B WE ARE AN AUTHORIZED." UTHORIZER < -, wlxeullNE WESTERN earl m sI r I NEAIIY DUiY Ate hw ,;M punderstand!der for W Joined; room got Ne ment Ngey 0 PeoRla We a SNOW PLOW:& '� DIESEL g 5 °R a"' (630) 892-7093 Me4l6a BI n7 _ „,t., SPJIEADER AEi1I FRI , ., DENALISi Rrst nnu Bn z - .... " " CALLTODAY... WE CAN HELP[ G✓ PJ ,an a. °Z .a, - -�YS z�l Pb4rca2 Pf IuESemonb4 ,•�t7� 4YC .:;:: "-•:.. - - --- - - .�• ;:.. pp OUte : i`Y�149`West Lake'StreeU „ i� • 30 9 = 09:3 ' , � or s'pp � SALE5�f0 - RS. •.. �. � t . .� �ww<wccoffmantrucksgm.com r ,� - tWltt4>r _ Pricesencludst Ktitle,and license lee.Aebales applied.$To qualire d buyers mm approved credit You must lade-ina 1999 or rawar ehicle(Saab¢uluded)and purchase a new GMC pickup to gwllrylar$lGOOTredeAssiss6'n¢s. Seectlealkfordemils40 qualified buyers wlN Sppmi2Urretlll 'OY< APAfnancingzvaPaN�dn' efsdl fmodefsin lieu of rebalestoqual Fred buyers;0%for72413.89 permo. per MW Inanced;0% for 6046.67permo. per$1,000Iinanced. Pictures are for illusma ion purposesonlyandmaynolr elleclac[mI vehicle. Dealerwill no thonorpricinganNorincenliueenors in his ad.See dealer for de ails. Manutaclurers incentives are foralimiledfimeand su6i�llo rtang¢. 7 mrsdav, May 3, 2012 RECARD 15 Our readers opinions Forum BUILD, Path are good news... Daddy Daughter Dance thanks... Lions Club blood drive... With SIT 0¢ doom and gloom uncles that se tope Yorkville Grade School Daddy unnemer Dane Ile swsmd 2012 Yorkville Lions Club blood live find mein nay into me newspaper here in YurkemelI Commhme . onto like it, brink par paranoia Dill be held It me Beecher Community form, on houghlsome proban racusimpup ... wi he 's harpoons and ' n 'J Lf hIpg make 1111,y ry CAmw Dow Road feu tor ] do, ThpiCam'. May miler. Sunni[ Effort hand d have Men hoppe - stares[ III her Am WOOS mile ooze 10, sand land painting the Yorkville Brad program 0110 donnlionsryv 'Down to the February Jones and the Record the path far We Nth. IOnak you an Yorkville Car Wash. not I body'I, edlmrad awtl rvho challenged the normally. our the Yorkville BUILD pmgmm n mhh seme Olive (Gram. Famous Drs,. Cap.. Diamond,d, nimary dmc rvus Nn. best In in. evil years. We skepticism area Oren proposed at of the P.coeamoi DEC, Jenny Mike's Sub Shop, 1K,. Neely Weds implanted Is units of blood rvhon Hmnland'I goal was Do,distant Common" hilt the maynrunit same of us Forts, Isgends Sports Bar, Smukey's. Wrigley, 28 mg. We huge that this is a troll trend antl even im tine ('Try Council believed x I wedded to sn"non. ( poison. singles 1312,11(1 l'nradie Gar bona donors up come on May 10. wriouthing entrant: W IJ 'R N h, Plain Molding ( ., 0" D I I t, R 13 e god I J J d'.Sky broadly vial hope ' d pm) hu s mch " w mlc Rol M DO aria Gold Seen Academy f Drive, c§oy llej " and lomem.de cork s.lake would M1npoen, ITC patty numbs rr onuJ [he Ana Zone, lmbrood Me, A tendril You Vocipl, and to Labor annual You will hear send Imuenllag BUILT) alumna , omkono 1 009, 2010 Poo V II yT d g C U )'; M B r Fy as to wh) cited g'rva. and 2011 nc had a our of 2 spade ddpdfly building Clh c Portals Pen FUL Haven, Idane Dell . Go. HILL SCHELL p0 -¢ During (lid first four months of IS 12. rye have Valley YMCA. Pony Ci ,. Burrnla said Wings, Yorkville Lions Club MJ ID .anglo Nell) points and 12 BUILD program Walik Village Grind Tor, Four, 1A 'fm. dinosaur 1122 in untmhs compared to 22 In lone yfine_ Spam Bar. Gems Prior 01,, Gantry. Iakcnlen We need more of this mr and thinking to continuo the Grill Kendall Pub. Verve. Nails. Belle t'mssa. motherland Suer IJ; Rionimmm.Gala Clp: F resonant Soon,.Are < md brief treat fu I. Ibe Poll far me Nth Hundred, ad Anytime F IfFoo, l far them lawn been 51Power of one pledged 4 special thanks goes I, drivers rT k Idle For �\ out of in, ,,at d Had id July s 2012 times is 120000 providing r d In d hose in M1 bankari hJ Lf ptymemb he<W M We otand diss, like hank YLrivlie ,nv of $18927 is doe among fiscal year 2012-2113 io the Middle School for the use of their facility. ^r°M ra °its alley is In the bank before the S'Nal year Ivan bcaerw. And a IS- [bank you pa everyone rvho attended TM1h e OkLN r �gainvome of themunolltwku l©po!(w[h lea graSS fm event, All prw'cuds to directly hack b Yorkville maY�rh-n(nT N> iry effort and so for is mutual like they Oman Sc'hml l'd amilmtmf District 115, will live farrowing to their promise. I think it Is gat that a YGS DADDY DAUGHTER DANCE Kenny Durland Ideal community gaup stuck their neck out and is COMMITTEE doing somommi skive for our city. Yorkville Prnhivc attitudes will do the United City Of Yorkville Re Bon D Yorkville, IT 60560 more goad than negative and nionernrauituJes Radio 63P553 5353 is a problem ge's look for creative nabs to sake the problem and n"just Say no and Omn our hands u MARTY NA wert] 3 alderman Vorl g1e M.Now UnitedHealthcare members have more choices... lill st Y 1 Bringing you all the news`ofKendall County Since 9864 Wrestlers i i Sports Church• - youth, use puppets to • e , 1 ..see Countywide . • . • • • .a.'�. «,iP o ea§"c -'��g`,�� ".®'_ '� . TT x a � ": c \ � ',hr' s. ;" • �` �. 4,yt i, ,, 'wa °�3" ._a '+ .' n ' ° ,� �`' .,,\- y..- s. ,cs }'l°"* 'S �'r r '0�m' � xw. • � �'� �.� V � w.��°as��a- "�"�' �' W 1 a T' �-e•-..�-°,��cx �+"�. .t9� `�. >y a ��i[a :•-i � aka ".L *R` 1V.-. 7. re[�'�i'p � �'nC. Vl'' „g,9 °� YU"•6` �' �.,, y �i tFr ��eyf"' 5,��; a� • • +Y `'$i sLv • � I `�".t}� � `�*d:h'��-" "' 4 r•9 ,�4ey _•�•+- � «ew iy.� ��, ' 1' `'C,r, �'L `' �SaaS �' ` , `^ '�,,,.e•.,,;,8�"` "w ' -c.' �b° '.. OF It �'`..w� v yY' `•ir" ` r ^'. • • e • �_ �- -� vg "�'" 41 �'i� A_ Ld hr� l.-"" P+ r`; Y ' ' IM _ I - - I • 4 ' ~`�\i\ tip- ..+. � � S p }. yy z 4C .c �` IYF ` ti � +J TICS E �..a / lr ,r . "V t.aQ_• F .` J f • "F\wpYmya c 9 •1 • • • I - 1 - I -• 1 ''�..-. y� t > t -I'.Lw a"QGk O Vey. ' 4 • 1 1 1 I t 4 ry �` E� j ja ,q •' 1�` c� �_ C`'Yr-mow.,$"�.' '^ dam P. T rt • " - 1 • • "V _ �V : _ — � e� _ � Ste. C - • • - • I - I • _ _ Io • I I 1 I . • W .-e...,,, ^ .. ,. ..e" " . . I • — vr� v � _ _ e e I • 11 I e • 1 • • I I ' a I ' - • I - - e • I . 1 �, r. r y _ _ It kk I • I . 1 , I 1 e - 1 . •1 . . • I F!- '". - '�"? xM1 . �"- ��"mod+ �`Ms�S � � �. T.W—�+.�' °�•'�� . ��. . • 1 • . - • I ' 1-� � ti kY e+ m' ,,�. ,a„ - �i `"�'L"�JJ� �'? .-.,ate ,j-r �r"rr✓ t N+.' ..� �"' y,yam.! `Y Y�"'r- '°'•-N erv'1aMr.d��M h �r`'SL: �. . • • I 4✓ k .t V i� r" ti H �;"" e.�..:s x��, ".. . "..mac ,euvskxde �-. �-�-�4'�'•`s'�< . . e I • 111 - x ,.� ,+a : r`T ,� .� si"'sJ �, w--.w-.-,z�';.'u.,x a .r�,., �.+.�.. M -...,- ...�-�, 1 1 • • I 1 e • I • 111 �'.' '� �" r�rX�-^1Y "'....n ,>+..,�fi -.+-�",7 ^' +'^ `v-'- r,+& r5r '� Cs4;�' • 1 - I I • I - e . - avb tky��T.'� ! It - A 4K " • 11 • - - e r • • fY`.tl�'N "Y�'. 'y"" +� sT'+'"Y,;r .+*« �.."e ttrr" ,,'�[�� 1"—"�F �-R.�... ��"'--^.` x i �-� � a�,m•aJ . . • I � I r KWv „x.•se �yw�* t•L � � � RAAe�,, rva`+ 5;-lad ew , va;��e >t t.,.Y � �'�^ ` '�a•""+�w'� z: A-m-M....'�"r�?`e �. �� 1 1 " I • e . 1 r r?o-vG� JYw 4 3grv•�m ~,f » e 1 • I _ Ie • _ • . e I 1 - 1 I I - . • I I e • • I I . 1 • I e 1 - • e • 1 • I 1 - e1 - I • 1 . I - 1 , a 1 • I • ' I • • I e - e ' I • e • I - I • e - I • 1e e I 1 I • • • e _ . • • • . e e I • e a • e • e . I _ _ • 6 Kendall Cbuntp RECORD Thursday, Jan. 24, 2013 Police news Facin several charges Ticketed after Identity theft Hunting stands, g G ` r2 crash at Rt 34, 47 A mural Xorkville resident called ,�,� �l�++ She rural : .Y after <learnmgl camera, stolen 9, In �1 2`Ll� ,1 e Ji e Fi that in unauthorized account was' Someone stole two game cameras and,i Daniel _ Cosma 3�,,,gt rctti} e t .7 Yorkville P Sw charged rue. lar F: opened in his name withoutpermission. two tree hunting stands,valued at a total, y Kegqt(a1l iZriYe��GQrkgi ly vYas charged Preston.SO„ of S.watisogAvenue, Plano, of $600,from property on Bell Road in rih wittil;�cnmmgl` tppg1ass, to .irpst¢ence with; driving, ,while„ her license was rural jMinooka. Shenffs Police aze,<<, Grim at ,-da}r;age ;19dpil erty, asspult,, ,., suspended Monday; -morning after her s investigating the theft in southern ,; and disorderly conduct Sunday car hit the back of another vehicle at NeVI!ark damage- Kendall : connty, which was reported afternoon after Yorkville Police were Route 34 and Route. 47. Preston was two da s In a rOW' Sunday. home on .Nader Court in also ticketed for failure, to.,reduce speed y called . to a A resident of East Ta loi Street in Yorkville because of a report of a to avoid an accident and operating an: domestic disturbance. uninsured vehicle., There were no Newark called: Sheriffs Police Friday: Arrest On Van Emmon injuries in the crash, according to police and Saturday to report damage at his Ethan C. Harbin, 22, of Spring Street, reports. home: On Friday, damage to an exterior . Yorkville, was charged with possession Injured In Rt. 52 Crash light post was estimated at $80. The of drug paraphernalia Jan. 17 Yorkville On Jan. 9, Jonathan Clever was Check stolen following day he called police to report $. p p inured in a single vehicle accident on an exterior light fixture rapped from its . at Woodland Drive r o equipment u)nment OBrien Road just south of Route 52. A rural Yorkville woman, called q p heriffs Police Saturday to' report that base and thrown a ditch.Damage in - violation and located. an item of drug Clever was traveling south on O'Brien O B one of her , business checks was that case was also estimated at $80, paraphernalia. when his truck veered off the road hitting a bridge support and endorsed and used t a former business overturning. Sheriffs Police said he was partner- Police said that payment the d check Tailgate stolen transported to the hospital. was Presented for payment' it did not FreenlOnt damage clear the bank. on Caton Farm Rd. Damage was estimated at $150 Someone stole a truck tailgate while Sunday when the driver's side window ,_ , n _ the vehicle was parked , in the 9400 of a car ,parked in the 600 block of jf block of Caton Farm Road in Kendall Freemont Street in Yorkville was found Township south of Yorkville. The broken. Yorkville Police are owner ,called ' Sheriffs Police Saturday investi gating to say. that the tailgate was taken sometime Jan. 16 or 17 while the truck ;ate was parked therefor sale. The missing License Violations «� tailgate was valued at $350. Josef M. Engel, 27, of Route 47, ' g Newark, was charged with driving while his license was suspended Friday + Pills Stolen at work morning after Sheriffs Police stopped _ Twenty-eight Hydrocodene his car at Route 47 and . Helmar Road Acetaminophen pills were reported because it had no front registration stolen Jan. 16 from a business in the plate. 9700 block of Route 126, Yorkville. Sheriffs Police charged Christopher Sheriffs Police said an employee J. Sebastion, 20, of Bowditch Avenue, reported the. pills were taken from his Aurora, with driving without a valid lunch box. ' driver's license after an accident about 4:45 a.m. at Route 71 an d Newark Damage on Bertram Road g Brandon J. Rodriguez, 23 , of The passenger side mirror of a Edgelawn Drive, Aurora, was charged vehicle parked in the 100 block of with driving without a valid driver's < Thanks in part to the city's BUILD incentive program "homebuilding increased Bertram Drive, Yorkville; was damaged ` license Friday morning after Yorkvile for the first-time in several. years in 2012:, City officialssay ifs�(ist the start of Friday. Yorkville Police reports. said Police stooped his car at Route 34 and an'upward trend- (Record Photaby Ehco Miller) damage was estimated at$350. 1 Beecher Road. Yorkville Police charged Ryan T. Deane, Independence Boulevard, Building of new homes up Yorkvillele,, with h driving while his license. was suspended after stopping his car at F +� MJason A. Gale, , of. St. James by 60 1pe{!rcent g 'ri'n. e, Jason Jason A. Gale, 36, of St. James LJ y 1J, l Parkway, Sugar Grove; was charged. w •. ,,with driving while his license was Cher e have been incentives for suspended Jan. 17. Yorkville Police ^fioniopagone . _ " p commercial building, including the TIF Cinema stopped his car on Route 47 north of stopped Boulevard and also ticketed some'?of the recovery I, think 2013 is districts attd pusiness districts in the city. r x . wJen ou' . going to see.u� limWigg oyt `,We've b( iii pretty 'steady," she said.m.him for having no insurance. . 2 ° • • , i of 'i1. 2014r when you see us begin to I "New buildouts, you'll see that this year (815)786-1999 All Theaters Feafu�STal Seating• • - - peak again, and 2015-2016 is when with the new theater and with the Dairy andaitalSdund you'll see the full recovery. That's how I Queen, as well as (stores) in Kendall Children, Senims$G.00•Adult Mel $7.00 see it. We're still keeping our budget set Marketplace, and you'll have new Students Win $7.00 •AduR$8.00 .30MOliies$2More at the 35, 36:-buildmg,perrrutlevel, just to tenants in the Heartland property as be conservativeao wemeet our goals. well:' rmesinaarenmessOWayFridavmm+surdayOnN The number of commercial building Barksdale-Noble said the residential Times F°�bwcd byAslerd¢' Piay Faeayasawrdayony _ - permits wbich :are _ - ' mostly for building impacted commercial building businesses filling in vacancies in in the city. Sh wfines listed for F6insdhursif3l shopping centers, but include any other F "The trend is, more rooftops, more + Gangster Squad (R) business-re)ated ,permits -stayed steady ecommercial " she said. "So, with the 20 7:05,9:30* x 1 at 111 last year, compared to 129 the BUILD program, it has now triggered (2:20) year before `arid 119` in`2010. ' She said` more-eoirimercial:' + Zero IDarkThlrty(R) Route 3o off (.12:45) 4:10,7:25 Q1 EATER$ 10ri - '•' g UA + Hansel & Greteh Witch r Hunters 3D (R) 12:20,2: 15 4:20, 7: 15, 9:15* SHOWIIMESI(G5 - V37 ©NOp„ms ( ) TIRES AND TIMESSUNJEET TO CHANGE + Last Stand (R) / 1 / 1. (12:05,2:25). 4:40,7: 10, 9:35* (12: 10;2:30) 4:50,7:20, 940 ¢UNERSR) .RErEUwncR + Mama (t•G13) ”'` 12 TO"�35519 20 FRIISAT LS ti 30 © NANSELsB,,GNErEL• WITCH ' s (12: 15, 2:20) 4:30,7:30, 94512 HOMERS 7}230700 h FRUSAT S 7205 Actually, rt can be quite comfortable. Thats because were not only + Parental Guidartic G) 0 PARM (R) n 00 4 35;n:75 6:5°, 9:25 FRUSAT LS ,2.00 -"exceptional dentists but we've spentyears perfectingtechniques that (12:00)4:40 - . p MOVIE (R) 1f'S0 2,uo 420. 7:30, 9:45 FRVSAT L512:1§ make even the most nervous_patients feel relaxed and at ease. Our + Parker 0"0°"9 o(P asAT�s',Z;o" 500' gentle touch will help make sure thel only thing you feel is at home. 12:40 4:00; 7:00, 9:20* , OTHE LAST STAND (R T:os. 92s - ( ) 0 BR LININGS PLAYBOOx (R) 11:00. 1'40,-420: 7:00, 9;40. o xxoxex cm uR> 0 Z O BARK5 725. 9:55 - . ShowsSt6rfing Before 3qn DO NOtPoayMmThUrs © 102.50ARRTHIHTT (R) Stews ShrtngARerapm Do NOtPo Sur�Thus '1110 2:50 .6 U 10.00 Group FRI-SUN,TUEOA011: FRI-SUN,TUE, TH 17:45, 220, 4:55, 7:30 ll Compassionate Dentistry Shnwtimes subject to change MON 11:45, 2:20. 10:05 11:45. 10:05 420 E Church Street Sandwich, IL 60548 John S. Waters, D.D.S. For more info and links www.wow7.com A HAUNTER HOUSE (R) 12:00, 220. a:50, 7:15, 9a0 FRI Lsn:as 815-786-2146 - AdamR. Winckler, D.D.S. or call (815)786-1999 or (630)552-8888 PABENrAL GUIDANCE ii 1120, 2:05, 4A0 DATE : 03/04/2013 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE : 1 TIME : OB : 19 : 51 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT IT PT420000 .WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 03/0412013 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE : SIP PERMIT 0 APPLI£0 FEE IMPROV- TYPE STATUS DATE LOCATION TYPE CODE VALUE CONTRACTOR NEXT OF USE PERMIT FEE 20120018 02/13/2012 318 BERTRAM DR HIP 1E 00 SUITE HOMES NEW RES 16, 997 . 80 C OWNER: TRITE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : ERB RB LOT : 1039 20120028 02/17/2012 2279 LAV2ND2R WAY 1 26, 851 . 00 PULTE HOMES NEW AES 13, 376 . 49 C OWNER: -=E HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB ! AC LOT : 71 20120030 02/93/2012 1979 MEADOWLARK IN SIP *** 2]5, 000 . 00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 20, 120 . 00 C OWN-k: I: CUE BUILDERS PO BOX 354 BRIBTOL, IL 60512 SUB: CNT LOT: 118 20120036 03/01/2012 1292 OEERPATH OR SIP " 180, 000 . 00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 14, 032 .20 2 OWNER: HC LAND PARTNERS 6125 REDGATE IN YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB: HLC LOT: 227 201200]] 03/27/2012 2557 EMERALD IN 8IP *'* 1"15, 372 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 778 . 69 T OWNER: SUITE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT : 128 20120083 03/6 :'i /2012 1554 CRIMSON IN SIP *** 161, 636 . 00 SUITE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 697 . B9 C OWNER: PF'.C=, HOMES 1901 N HOBBLE SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AT LOT : 301 20120100 04/ '9/2012 < - 2 PLYMOUTH AVE RIP ' 111, 928 . 00 PULTE BRISTOL BAY NEW RES 16, 103 . 40 C OWNER: PUCTFI 1901 N ROSELLE RD 3539 W 57 PL, ONTO, IL 60629 SCHAUMBURG, IL 5D195 SUB: IRS LOT : 995 20120101 04/ 02 /2012 2383 LAVENDER WAY 8IP *** 106, 046 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 170 . B9 C OWNER: PULTE 1401 N ROSELLE RD 1623 CANYON RUN, NAPERVILLE, IL SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT : 90 20120113 04/ 12/2012 1145 GRACE OR BID *** 245 , 000 . 00 NICHE BUILDERS NEW RES 13, 956. 20 C DWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS INC PO BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60560 SUB: HLC LOT : 67 20120125 04/ 18/2012 1562 CRIMSON IN BIP "I 175 , 372 . 00 FINITE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 778 . 69 C OWNER: CULTS HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 6D195 BOB: AT LOT : 201 20120126 04/18/2012 1092 CARLY DR BIP *** 318 , 240 . 00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 19, 463 . 78 C OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60512 SUB : BBD LOT : 30 20120165 05/07/2012 1273 TAUS CIR SIP * SED, 000 . 00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 13, 529 . 60 C OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 REDGATE IN YORKVILLE, IL*60560 SUB : HLC LOT : 117 20120183 05/16/2012 827 GREENFIELD TURN BIP "1 270, 000 . 00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 20, 321 . 80 C OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS/-,ARY FRANCIS PD BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60512 SUB : CUT LOT : 51 20120184 05/17 /2012 244 EMERALD IN BIP '** 160, 530 . 00 SUITE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 778 . 69 C OWNER: SUITE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 114 20120185 05/17/2012 1494 CRI_V N LN SIP 136, 570 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 527 . 49 C OWNER: SUITS HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT: 901 20120205 D5/2912012 1192 KATE DR BTP *' 220, 000 . 00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 13 , 933 . 80 C OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 REDGATE IN YORKVILLE, IL*6056D SUB : PLC LOT : 236 Il DATE : 03/04/2013 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE : 2 TIME : 08 : 19 : 51 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID : PT420000 .WDW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 03/04/2013 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: BIP PERMIT APPLIED FEE IMPROV- TYPE STATUS DATE LOCATION TYPE CODE VALUE CONTRACTOR MEND OF USE PERMIT FEE _______ ___--___ 2DL20217 09/20/2012 12B2 ^i,E AR6>^33 DR BIP *xx 25D, 000 . 00 RICHARD MARKER 4 ASSOC . NEW RES L3, 547 . 60 C OWNER: RICHARD MARKE£ ASSOC 654 E.EARTLAND OR YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB : HLC LOT : 250 20120218 06/04/2012 1377 SPRING ST SIR +++ 269, 565 . 00 MOTOR BUILDERS NEW RES 14, 012 . 40 C OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO 354 BRISTOL, IL 60512 SOB : HLC LOT : 254 20120244 06/18/2012 1519 CRIMSON IN BID *+* 170, 850 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 652 . 09 C OWNER: PULTE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAOMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 1601 20120245 06/18/2012 1546 CRIMSON IN BIP *+* 132, 666 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 327 . 49 0 OWNER: PULTE 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOU : 401 20120275 06/26/2012 2420 SAGE CT BIP ++ 153, 578 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 450 . 49 C OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHADMBQRG, IL 60195 SOB : AC LOT: 3101 20120276 06/26/2012 1530 CRIMSON IN BIP 151, 810 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 439 . 69 C OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBQRG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT: 601 20120277 06/26/2012 1511 CRIMSON IN BIP *** 175, 372 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 578 . 69 C OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT: 1501 20120278 06126/2D12 4620 PLYMOUTH AVE BIP '** 126, 922 . OD PULTE BRISTOL BAY NEW RES 13, 293 . 69 E OWNER: PULTE HOMES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : ERB LOT: 994 20120413 08 /29/2D12 1201 KATE OR BIP ** 180, 000 . 00 TIM GREYER BUILDERS NEW RES 13, 529 . 00 C OWNE3 TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 RED GATE IN YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB: HLC LDT : 244 20120482 09/06/2D12 2384 TITUS DR BIP 107, 780 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 381 . 09 T OWNEn PI-PE 3R0=P 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCEAQMRURG, IL 60195 SUB: AO LOT: 246 201204c3 '.9,10611 .2 2394 TITUS DR BIP ** 86, 502 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 067 . 69 I OWNER: P'J TD CB077 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 090 : AC LOT: 248 20120477 09/13/20:2 2388 TITUS OR �I "1 58 , 786. 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 092 . 89 C T OWNER: PULTE G-,OP 5. 901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 247 20120552 10/04/202 1513 CRIMSON LN BIP 140 , 998 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW ASK 13 , 576 . 49 I OWNER: PULTE HCP:ES 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 1901 201205 - 9 10/18/20:% 2393 TITUS DR HIP *** 107 , 780 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, BG6 . 09 T OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD STE 1000 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AN LOT : 250 20120520 10/18/2012 2345 TITUS DR DIP **+ 103, 292 . 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 354 . 69 T OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD STE 1000 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 255 20120521 10/18/2012 2353 TITUS OR BIP * 08 , 502 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 752 . 69 T OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 254 DATE : 03/04/2013 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE : 3 TIME: 08019 : 51 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID : PT420000 .WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 03/D4/2013 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: BIP PERMIT # APPLIED FEE IMPROV- TYPE STATUS DATE LOCATION TYPE CODE VALUE CONTRACTOR MENT OF USE PERMIT FEE ------------- - ---------------------------------------- _____--_-----------1 RE_______--------------______---------____ 20120522 10/18/2012 462 OMAHA DR BIP * 280, 000 . 00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW S 13, 721. 60 T OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 REDGATE IN YORRVILLE, IL*60560 SUB: HLC LOT : 82 20120546 11/01/2012 1322 DEERPATH DR BIP *** 240, 000 . 00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 13, 506. 20 1 OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60512 SUB: HLC LOT:. 224 20120559 11/13/2012 2368 TITUS DR BI 143, 1]4 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 639 . 29 T OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD 41000 P SCHAUMHURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT: 243 20120560 11/13/2012 1491 CRIMSON LN P *** 151, 810 . 00 PULTE HOMES CORE NEW RES 13, 440 . 09 I OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD =NMI SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AT LOT : 1401 20120566 11/15/2012 2374 TITUS DR BIP ** . 99, 926. 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 334 . 89 T OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD STE 1000 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 244 20120589 12/19/2012 2339 TITUS DR P x** 143, 174 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13 , 389 . 29 I OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD =kSCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 256 20120590 12/1912012 2325 TITUS DR P *x* 123, 012 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW ME 13 , 270 . 69 I OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD E=kSCHAUMBURG, IL 6019.5 SUB : AC LOT : 257 20130009 01/14/2013 2348 TITUS OR BIP 123, 012 . 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 375 . 69 I OWNER: THE PULSE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AT LOT: 239 20130010 01/14/2013 2545 EMERALD IN His *** 132, 668 . 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 432 . 49 I OFFER: THE PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AS LOT : 126 20130023 02/05/2013 2256 LAVENDER WAY P *** 132 , 668 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 432. 49 I OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT: 60 20130024 02/0512013 2399 AUTUMN CREEK BLVD BIP *x* 1] 5 , 3]2 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13, 683 . 69 I OWNER: THE PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD - SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT : 266 20130025 02/05/2013 2344 TITUS DR * 104, 312 . 00 PULTE AUTUM CREEK NEW RES 13,265 . 69 I OWNER: THE PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 230 20130031 0.2/05/2013 2364 TITUS DR P *** 99, 926. 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 239. 89 I OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD =EmiSCHWUMBURG, 11, 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 242 20130032 02/0512013 2305 TITUS DR * 124, 134 . 00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13, 382 , 29 I OWNER: THE PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD ELGIN, IL 60195 SUB : AC LOT : 259 ` 20130039 02107/2013 1162 CODY CT RIP ** 265, 000 . 00 WINNINGER EXCAVATING, INC. NEW RES 19, 518 . 18 A OWNER: JIM & RYAN BOWEN 746 JOHN ST YORKVILLE, IL 60560 SUB: BBW LOT: B 20130040 02/08/2013 1102 CARLY DR BIP **x 275, 000 . 00 MCCUE BUILDERS NEW RES 19, 906 . 18 I OWNER: MCCUE BUILDERS PO BOX 354 BRISTOL, IL 60512 SUB : BBW LOT: 28 DATE: 03/04/2013 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 08:19:51 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID: PT420000.WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01/01/2012 TO 03/04/2013 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE: SIP PERMIT APPLIED FEE IMPROV- TYPE STATUS DATE LOCATION TYPE CODE VALUE CONTRACTOR MENT OF USE PERMIT FEE __________________________________ _-____ _-__--________________-_______________----______________ _______ *** 20130047 02/19/2013 2320 TITUS DR SIP 143,174.00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13,494.29 -A OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 233 20130055 02/27/2013 342 WESTWIND DR SIP *** 180,000.00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 23,302.00 A OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 RED GATE IN YORKVILLE,IL 60560 SUB:. CBW LOT: 7 20130056 02/27/2013 1112 AUBURN DR SIP *** 180,000.00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 13,568.00 A OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 RED GATE IN YORKVILLE,IL 60560 SUB: HLC LOT: 87 20130057 02/27/2013 1459 WOODSAGE AVE SIP *** 160,000.00 Tim Greyer Builders NEW RES 23,226.00 -A OWNER: TIM GREYER BUILDERS 6125 RED GATE IN YORKVILLE,IL 60560 SUB: CBW LOT: 20 20130058 02/27/2013 2378 TITUS DR SIP *** 104,312.00 PULTE HOMES CORP NEW RES 13,265.69 A OWNER: PULTE GROUP 1901 N ROSELLE RD SCHAUMBURG,IL 60195 SUB: AC LOT: 245. DATE : 03 / 04 / 2013 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE : 5 TIME : 08 : 19 : 51 PERMITS SUMMARY REPORT ID : PT420000 . WOW PERMITS APPLIED FROM 01 / 01 / 2012 TO 03 / 04 /2013 SPECIFIED TYPE CODE : BIP CODE & DESCRIPTION # OF PERMITS CONSTRUCTION VALUE AVERAGE VALUE PERMIT FEES ____ _- __ _____ _ __ _ __ PERMIT TYPE SUMMARY : BIT BUILD INCENTIVE PROGRAM SFD 53 $ 8 , 645 , 086 . 00 $ 163 , 114 . 83 $ 773 , 334 . 80 IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY : NEW NEW 53 $ 8 , 645 , 086 . 00 $ 163 , 114 . 83 $ 773 , 334 . 80 TYPE OF USE SUMMARY : RES RESIDENTIAL 53 $ 8 , 6451086 . 00 $ 163 , 114 . 83 $ 773 , 334 . 80 STATUS SUMMARY : A APPLIED 6 $ 1 , 032 , 486 . 00 $ 172 , 081 . 00 $ 106 , 374 . 16 C CLOSED FILE 22 $ 4 , 186 , 478 . 00 $ 190 , 294 . 45 $ 323 , 743 . 97 I ISSUED 16 $ 2 , 361 , 510 . 00 $ 147 , 594 . 38 $ 221 , 294 . 75 T TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE 9 $ 1 , 064 , 612 . 00 $ 118 , 290 . 22 $ 121 , 921 . 92 SUBDIVISION SUMMARY : AC AUTUMN CREEK 33 $ 4 , 352 , 969 . 00 $ 131 , 908 . 15 $ 444 , 295 . 37 BBW BLACKBERRY WOODS 3 $ 858 , 240 . 00 $ 286 , 080 . 00 $ 58 , 888 . 14 BRB BRISTOL BAY 3 $ 404 , 312 . 00 $ 134 , 770 . 67 $ 45 , 844 . 89 CBW CORNERSTONE BRIARWOO 2 $ 340 , 000 . 00 $ 170 , 000 . 00 $ 46 , 528 . 00 CNT COUNTRY HILLS 2 $ 545 , 000 . 00 $ 272 , 500 . 00 $ 40 , 441 . 80 HIT HEARTLAND CIRCLE 10 $ 2 , 144 , 565 . 00 $ 214 , 456 . 50 $ 137 , 336 . 60 REPORT SUMMARY : 53 $ 81645 , 086 . 00 $ 163 , 114 . 83 $ 773 , 334 . 80 * * * - Multiple Fee Codes Matched B . U . I . L . D . Survey Analysis United City of Yorkville March 4, 2013 How influential was the incentive Do you agree you would have not in your decision to purchase a new moved to Yorkville this year if not home in Yorkville? for the program? 6% 22% 13% ■Extremely Influential 34% Strongly Agree ■Very Influential Somewhat Agree 47 ■Somewhat Influential Somewhat Disagree -Not Influential at All Strongly Disagree 25 47% How easy or complicated was the Which of the following builder contribution program process? options would you have preferred instead of the matching $5,000 in cash? 3% 3% 4% $5,000 in Closing Costs Very Understandable/Easy 23% $5,000 towards a Down Somewhat 23% Payment 34% Understandable/Easy $5,000 in Builder Somewhat Upgrades 60% Confusing/Difficult No Change Very Confusing/Difficult 20% Other 30% How did you hear about the Which Builder? B.U.I.L.D. program incentive? 14 12 3% 10 — 10% •Builder C 8 CL 0 •Friend a 6 — Newspaper 4 •Website •Realtor 2 0 Centex Greyer McCue Pulte Builder Were you looking in other communities to Where did you relocate from? purchase or build a home before choosing 5 Yorkville? 4 a, 3 a 0 a a 2 ■Yes ■No 1 0 a�0 t� etJ\\� r\`ago �aA'e Ga�o\� O�h� How do you plan on spending your Would you recommend this incentive money? program to a friend? 12% 7% Purchase furniture or goods Use towards debt/bills 27% 44% Yes Save or Invest it No Other 93% 17% Additional Comments From Participants "Great program and it was a great perk for moving to Yorkville." "Great incentive in theory but the way the builder handled did not make the BUILD program very beneficial." "Thank you, nice incentive to a New Home Buyer to welcome them to a new area." "Good program -very motivating." "Everyone was wonderful and we will tell everyone." "We had intended to build a house in Gates Creek in Oswego." "It's been a ten year dream to move closer to our children. We are from small town Iowa where everything is less expensive and while our home brought good money there -not so much for buying a home here. The new home was a lifelong dream and so this incentive was of tremendous value to us. Thank you so much." "Good incentive to keep new construction going in tough economic times." Building Permits Issued Per Year 800 753 NSINGLE FAMILY DETACHED OSINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED 700 600 572 -a 500 470 4A E 401 a 400 C 360 3 300 ?R4 Z 200 153 100 68 56 67 42 43 10 22 3 22 18 6 8 6 0 0 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Type of Building Permits Issued Comparison in 2012 Feb-13 M13.U.I.L.D.Single Family Dwelling Permit Jan-13 MRegular Single Family Dwelling Permit Dec-12 Nov-12 Oct-12 Sep-12 Aug-12 Jul-12 Jun-12 May-12 Apr-12 Mar-12 Feb-12 Total Amount between Jan. 2012- Feb. 2013 B.U.I.L.D.Single Family Dwelling Permits-46 Jan-12 Regular Single Family Dwelling Permits-38 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of Permits Issued UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, EXTENDING THE NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2012-21 (B.U.I.L.D. Program) Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois This day of March, 2013 Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois on '2013. Ordinance No. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,EXTENDING THE NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION INCENTIVE PROGRAM BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2012-21 (B.U.I.L.D. Program) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City adopted Ordinance Number 2012-03 on January 12, 2012 and Ordinance Number 2012-21 on July 24, 2012, establishing and amending a residential construction incentive and stimulus program known as the Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount(`B.U.I.L.D. Program"); and WHEREAS, the B.U.I.L.D Program has been successful in the City receiving 53 applications to participate in the B.U.I.L.D. Program; and WHEREAS, The Mayor and City Council have reviewed the success of the B.U.I.L.D. Program and have determined that it is in the best interest of the City and its future growth to extend the time for application until June 30, 2014. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. That Ordinance Number 2012-21 be and is herby amended by amending Section 1 of said Ordinance to read as follows: "Section 2. Residential Building Permit Fee Rebate. Building permit fees up to $5,000 shall be rebated for new homebuyers on the condition that the homebuyer intends the home to be the buyer's permanent residence and the developer/builder agrees to match the City's rebate dollar for dollar. Section 3. This Program shall expire June 30, 2014." Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , 2013. CITY CLERK Ordinance No.2013- Page 2 CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois,this day of 2013. MAYOR Ordinance No.2013- Page 3 A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 440 Legal ❑ Mayor#2 Finance ■ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ^�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ CC 2013-18 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Letter opposing cuts to Local Government Distributive Fund revenues Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Q Memorandum �` To: City Council Esr. 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator .t ! CC: Date: March 21, 2013 NcrAil Cc.city �� ALE % Subject: Local Government Distributive Fund letter Summary Approval of a letter to be sent to state officials on a state proposal to withhold local government distributive fund revenues. Background The Governor's Office has proposed to withhold a portion of Local Government Distributive Fund revenues in future years. As you may recall, the Local Government Distributive Fund(LGDF) is a portion of the state income tax that is sent to municipalities each year. The City receives about $88 per resident or$1.5 million annually in state income taxes, although that number has been trending higher recently. The actual calculation for our portion of the state income tax is —6% of all state income tax proceeds. As the attached letter articulates, the municipal portion of state income tax was reduced from 10% of all income tax proceeds to —6%when the states income tax was increased two years ago. The Governor's specific proposal would be to cap the amount that municipalities receive in state fiscal year 2012. This proposal means that as the economy improves and more people pay income taxes, that municipalities will receive no growth in revenue. The Governor's Office has estimated this growth at roughly $5.30 per resident per year, and the IML has estimated it at $11.50 per year. That means the City is looking at losing $90,000 to $200,000 per year in revenue growth. This is money the City needs to be able to fund long-term capital projects and police staffing. However, we are in a unique position budget-wise, as we have already assumed over a five-year period that there will be no growth in this revenue line-item. We have prepared for the worst,but are advocating the need for our portion of the state income tax. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the attached letter. If approved, we will send to multiple state elected officials. D1r o United City of Yorkville "" 800 Game Farm Road EST. - _ 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us tLE % March 20,2013 [NAME] [ADDRESS] [ADDRESS] Dear Representative/Senator[LAST NAME]: As a result of the recession and declining revenues,municipalities throughout the state have been forced to make difficult choices in order to maintain balanced budgets while still providing the vital services that their residents need and expect. The Illinois Municipal League has learned that Governor Quinn is proposing to reduce"transfers out"by$240 million.We have also learned that some legislators are supporting the use of the Local Government Distributive Fund (LGDF)to address the state's fiscal woes. This is very disturbing news and we need your help. Prior to January of 2011,municipalities received 10%of all state income tax revenues generated by its residents. This was an agreement established decades ago by the State of Illinois in exchange for an agreement by municipalities not to levy their own tax.Following the largest income tax increase in Illinois history,that percentage dropped to 6%after the General Assembly decided that the state would keep all proceeds of that tax increase,including the incremental portion of the new revenues generated that would have normally been used to help local municipalities. The Governor's recent proposal to cap LGDF revenues using FY2012 as the base year would reduce local government revenues by at least$11.50 per resident.For the United City of Yorkville,the total amount at risk under the proposal is$194,500.This is not a loss the City of Yorkville can sustain without cuts to vital services. During the recession, the City's bond rating was downgraded into B-level,we downsized our workforce by 30%,we saw new housing starts drop from 1000 to less than 100 per year,we dealt with thousands of acres of vacant and unfinished subdivisions,and we had to raise property taxes by 90%two years ago to pay for previously completed infrastructure projects. We have not been able to keep up with regional police staffing levels,and we are finally doing our first road maintenance program in over seven years. The local funds proposed to be withheld by the state are funds used to provide critical services such as police,fire,roads, infrastructure and snowplowing.If implemented,the reduction will undermine the safety and well-being of our municipalities'residents. Municipalities did not create nor did they contribute to the state's debt situation.Our cities and villages have reduced their expenditures;they have modified their programs;they have become more efficient and they have paid their pension obligations.Yet it seems that Governor Quinn and some members of the General Assembly would prefer to solve the state's fiscal challenges by simply transferring the state's fiscal crisis to local municipalities.The state must not be allowed to reduce these revenues for this purpose. Please protect the Local Government Distributive Fund and enact the reforms necessary to ensure that the State of Illinois lives within its means without impacting local governments and the residents that they serve. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Gary J.Golinski,Mayor 3/21/13 Print Story beaconnews Kendall, local governments worried about losing state funds By Steve Lord slord@stmedianetwork.com Last Modified: Mar 20, 2013 02:34AM YORKVILLE Kendall County is urging the state to stop the bleeding. Bleeding local government of its revenue, that is. The County Board Tuesday voted unanimously to back a resolution opposing the state capping the Local Government Distributive Fund, a move that would affect all counties and municipalities throughout Illinois. The proposal, which came from Gov. Pat Quinn's office, is to cap the distributive fund at 2012 levels, and keep any growth beyond that with the state. For Kendall County, it would mean the loss of about $458,000; for local government across the state, it would mean a loss of between$68 million and $148 million, depending on whether figures from the governor's office or the Illinois Municipal League are used. However it's figured, Kendall County officials see it as another grab by the state of money intended for local government money local government needs. "Over the past several years, the Illinois General Assembly has considered and adopted certain measures to divert portions of the Local Government Distributive Fund,"the resolution says. Jeff Wilkins, Kendall County administrator, pointed out the state took the inheritance tax last year and pushed to take the personal property replacement tax. Loss of the inheritance tax cost Kendall County about $200,000. "If all these had passed, that's over $1 million in revenue the county would have lost,"Wilkins told the County Board Tuesday. Money from the Local Government Distributive Fund is doled out to counties and municipalities on the basis of population. The governor's office says the new budget proposal would take an estimated $5.30 a person, for a total of about$68 million, from municipalities and counties. But the Illinois Municipal League has said the governor's office is `vastly underestimating the financial impact"of the proposed cap on the local government find. They used their own financial projections with numbers from the Illinois Department of Revenue to come up with a figure of$11.50 a person, or an estimated $148 million that local government would lose. beaconnews.sunti mes.com/news/18970307-418/kendal 1-1 ocal-g ow;rnments-wor ri ed-about-losing-state-funds.html?pr i nt=true 1/2 3/21/13 Print Story Bart Olson, Yorkville's city administrator, said using both figures, the city would lose between$90,000 and $200,000. Using the same figures, Aurora would lose between$1.05 million and $2.28 million, and Kane County would lose between$2.72 million and $5.93 million. Copyright© 2013 Sun-Times Media, LLC beaconnews.sunti mes.condnews/18970307-418/Iandall-local-g owrnments-worri ed-about-I osi ng-state-funds.html?print=true 2/2 A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number D Legal ❑ PW#1 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ PW 2013-11 Police ELE ��"� Public Works 0 Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Fox Hill and Sunflower SSA Mowing and Maintenance RFP Results Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: RFP results for the annual contract to mow and maintain the SSA areas in Fox Hill and Sunflower Estates. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 3/19/13 Action Taken: Moved forward to CC agenda. Item Number: PW 2013-11 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval of selected bidder Submitted by: Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Agenda Item Notes: cok 0 emorandum ' To : Mayor and City Council EST - 1$ 6 From : Eric Dhuse Director of Public Worksr " 0 CC : Bart Olson, Administrator 0tol * coo sea 0 Date .. March 21 , 2013 ,Mnd� o , . �" ` Subject : Fox Hill and Sunflower RFP results Mayor and City Council , Pro osals for the earl mowin and maintenance in the Fox Hill and Sunflower Estates Prop yearly g subdivisions were opened on March 18 , 2013 . We were fortunate to receive great bids again this year from 8 different contractors (bid tab attached) . The lowest bid received was from Marywood Landscaping from North Aurora . I have checked their references and would propose that the Mayor and Council accept the proposal for the mowing and maintenance of the Fox Hill and Sunflower Estates subdivisions for the fiscal year 2013 - 2014 from Marywood Landscaping , Inc . I would ask that this be placed on the City Council agenda on March 26 , 2013 . If you have any questions or need further information please let me know . FOX HILL ESTATES & SUNFLOWER ESTATES SSA BID TABULATION FORM FY 13 - 14 BID OPENING 3/18/ 13 12 : PM WITNESS : ED Vendor Vendor Vendor Vendor The TLC Group George ' s Landscaping Yorkville Mowing & Land . Marywood Landscaping, Inc PO Box 127 1410 Mills Rd 1211 Unit B Deere St . 3s842 Oakland Lane CITY ESTIMATE Clarendon Hills, IL 60514 Joliet, Illinois 60433 Yorkville, IL 60560 North Aurora, IL 60542 ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PER ACRE Sunflower Estates 5 AC $ 50 . 00 $ 25 . 00 $ 45 . 00 $ 20900 $ 18 . 50 0 Fox Hill 5429 AC $ 50000 $ 25 . 00 $ 45 . 00 $ 20 . 00 $ 18 . 50 YEARLY PRICE Sunflower Estates Yearly Cost Based on 28 Cuttings $ 71000 . 00 $ 31500 . 00 $ 61300 . 00 $ 21800 . 00 $ 21590 . 00 Fox Hill Yearly Cost Based on 28 Cuttings $ 71406 . 00 $ 3 , 70100 $ 6, 665640 $ 2, 962340 $ 2, 74012 Rate Rate Rate Rate Mulching CY $ 40 . 00 $ 33 . 00 $ 48450 $ 40 . 00 $ 35 . 00 Weeding HR $ 40 . 00 $ 25 . 00 $ 28 . 50 $ 30 . 00 $ 20 . 00 Monument Repairs HR $ 40 . 00 $ 30 . 00 $ 40 . 00 $ 30 . 00 $ 25 . 00 General Maintenance HR $ 40 . 00 $ 25 . 00 $ 40 . 00 $ 30 . 00 $ 25 . 00 Beautification HR $ 40 . 00 $ 25 . 00 $ 40 . 00 $ 30 . 00 $ 25 . 00 Vendor Vendor Vendor Vendor Grenlend Lawn Services Horticultural Specialties Terra Care Landscape Twin Oaks Landscaping PO Box 12 18 S 13th St PO Box 445 997 Harvey Rd CITY ESTIMATE Bristol, IL 60512 St . Charles, IL 60174 North Aurora , IL 60542 Oswego, IL 60543 ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PER ACRE Sunflower Estates 5 AC $ 50 . 00 $ 38 . 00 $ 20 . 00 $ 49 . 00 $ 26 . 00 0 Fox Hill 5029 AC $ 50 . 00 $ 38 . 00 $ 20600 $ 49 . 00 $ 26 . 00 YEARLY PRICE Sunflower Estates Yearly Cost Based on 28 Cuttings $ 71000 . 00 $ 51320 . 00 $ 21800 . 00 $ 61860 . 00 $ 31640 . 00 Fox Hill Yearly Cost Based on 28 Cuttings $ 71406 . 00 $ 5 , 628 . 56 $ 2, 962840 $ 7, 257 . 88 $ 31851 . 12 Rate _ Rate Rate Rate Mulching CY $ 40800 $ 39 . 75 $ 40 . 00 $ 37000 $ 45000 Weeding HR $ 40 . 00 $ 30 . 00 $ 35 . 00 $ 36 . 00 $ 30 . 00 Monument Repairs HR $ 40200 $ 30 . 00 $ 35 . 00 $ 36 . 00 $ 40 . 00 General Maintenance HR $ 40 . 00 $ 30 . 00 $ 35 . 00 $ 36800 $ 30400 Beautification HR $ 40 . 00 $ 30 . 00 $ 35 . 00 $ 36 . 00 $ 30 . 00 To : Public works Committee EST `-�� --� 1ss From : Eric Dhuse Director of Public works CC : Bart Olson, Administrator 0 Date : March 14 2013 Cou if sea 0 ndM ari Subject : RFP results for Fox Hill and Sunflower SSA areas 4E All , Bids for the Fox Hill and Sunflower Estates annual mowing and maintenance RFP will be opened Monday March 18 , 2013 at 12 : 00pm . I will bring the results and recommendation of a vendor to the Public works Committee Meeting on March 19th . I have attached a copy of the RFP for your review . If you have any questions or need further information, please let me know . j ,I i i I I I l , E I I United City of Yorkville , Illinois I I Request for Proposal Mowing and Maintenance of the Sunflower Estates an Fox H ilk u di r�s ns pecial er cc Areas } i February 2013 S } } S } i i } } } r 1 I S 1 i i I i i i I I Request for Proposals 1 . The United City of Yorkville, Illinois (the " City") is issuing this Request for Proposal ("RFP") for the purpose of soliciting vendor proposals for the plowing and maintenance of certain areas in the Sunflower Estates and Fox Hill subdivisions Special Service Areas to serve the current and projected needs of the City . 2 . The City intends to seep the most cost- effective solution, based on the Criteria contained in this RFP , for its needs . 3 . One original and one copy of the proposal will be accepted. until 12 : 00 p . m . , on Monday, March 18 , 2013 . Proposals submitted must be binding four not less than ninety (90) days after the date received . The City will select the proposal, or combination of Proposals , that, in its opinion, is in the best interest of the City . The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or portions of a proposal . The City also reserves the right to waive minor technicalities in the proposal . The City not only reserves the right at the sole discretion of the City to reject any and all proposals and to waive technicalities , but also reserves the right of evaluation and the right to determine the methodology for evaluation of the proposals to determine which is the best proposal and to accept the proposal (or proposals) deemed to be in 'the best interest of the City, i. e . , the most qualified proposal will not necessarily be the proposal with the lowest cost. Further, the City reserves the right to accept a proposal (or proposals) for any or all items separately or together . 4 . All inquiries shall only be addressed at a meeting open to all potential bidders with Eric Dhuse, Director of Public works of the United City of Yorkville to be held Friday , March 15 , 2012, at 9 : 00 AM at the United City of Yorkville City Council chambers , 800 Game Farm Road ` Yorkville , Illinois . 5 . Proposals may also be han& delivered to the following address by the date and time specified . It is the responsibiiity of the bidder to deliver the proposal in accordance with these inst ctions contained above and/or elsewhere in the RFP , Proposals dispatched, but not received by the City by l oposa closing t1I'm.e , wi11 be retumed., after receipt, unopened. to the bidder . All proposals should be addressed to . united City of Yorkville Rea. (vendor name) Proposal for Fox Hill and Sunflower Estates subdivisions Special Service Areas Mowing and Maintenance Attention : Bric Dhuse , Director of Public works 800 Game Farm Rd . Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Proposal packets are available online at www . yorkville . il . us or at the United City of Yorkville city hall which is located at 800 Game Farm Rd . , Yorkville , Illinois . 6 . Award of Contract. The Uaed City of Yorkville City Council will make the nal award of the proposal or contract. 7 . Contract . In addition to the completed proposal , a resulting contract may be required by the City , including but not limited to , written correspondence between the City and the vendor subsequent to the proposal submission, facsimiles and product literature . All agreements between the United City of Yorkville and the vendor will be handled through our legal counsel . ha addition, any legal restrictions or provisions , enforced by the vendor or its parent company , which are not in lffie with the industry ' s standard , should be pointed out . i . Proposals shall be unopened so as to avoid. disclosure of contents 8 . Confidentiality of Documents . P p P to competing bidders and kept secret during the process of negotiation . However , all proposals that have been submitted shall be open for public inspection after contract award . Trade secrets and confidential information, as specified by the vendor, contained in the proposals shall not be open for public inspection . 9 . Contact with City Employees . In order to ensure fair and objective evaluation, all questions related to this RFP should be addressed only to the person. ( s) so ruined in this RFP ; those persons are Eric Muse and. Scott Sleezer . Contact with any other City employee is expressly prohibited without prior consent of the persons so named herein , vendors directly contacting other City employees will risk elimination of their proposal from further consideration . Conditions 1 . Contractor shall perform the maintenance and f mish. all labor , equipment, and services and kv supplies for the mowing and string trimming and other maintenance and services for the Fox Hill and Sunflower Estates subdivisions Special Service Areas ( see attached maps) for the approximate period of April 1 , 2013 through November 1 , 2013 . 2 . Contractor will finni. sh upon request the following certificates of insurance with provision that insurance policies may not be cancelled or endorsed in any way which would reduce or limit coverage within ( l0) days prior written notice to the United City of Yorkville . A . workman ' s Compensation Insurance covering employees performing the services outlined in the contract . B . Comprehensive General Liability Insurance on an occurrence basis in an insurance company Ii. censed to do business in this state . $ 1 , 000 , 00 , 00 /$ 2 , 000 , 000 . 00 1 J 3 . work completed under this contract shall be subject to the approval of the United City of Yorkville . For the practical implementation of the contract, the contractor agrees to meet wi th the City as often as necessary to discuss any and all aspects of the contract. 4 . If in the opinion of the United City of Yorkville Public works Department or the Parks and Recreation Department, the contractor has not or is not satisfactorily performing the work covered by this specification, and within two (2 ) weeks ( 1. 4 calendar days) of receipt of a written demand front. the United City of Yorkville, for performance, has not cured any defect M performance specifically itemized M* demand, the United City of Yorkville may , at its option ; 1 ) Consider all or any part of this contract breached 2) May hire another contractor to cure any defects in performance or complete all work covered by this specification for the remaining term of this contract . 3 ) Any demand for performance shall be specifically delivered to t Contractor by registered mail , t i i 5 . Neither the contractor nor the United City of Yorkville shall be held. liable in damages caused r beyond its control and without its fault or negligence including but not limited to , acts of God or the public enemy , acts of the government, fires , floods , epidemics , quarantine restrictions , strikes , freight embargoes , or unusually severe weather . Criteria 1 . MOWING ., all �cnawable areas will be maintained at a height of 2 /z" or 3 " in hot and. dry conditions . Grass shall be cut weekly or when it is l " higher than specified height . Grass next to light poles , trees , trails , etc . , shall be mechanically trlrnrned to the same height as specified above at the time of each mowing , All grass clippings and debris , shall be removed from the sidewalks , trails , and streets at the time cutting tales place. 2 . MULCHING - shredded hardwood mulch shall be placed around trees , flower beds , and other landscape areas to a depth. of 3 " up to two times per year at the request of the City. All pricing to be cubic yard price installed. 3 . WEEDING - All landscaped areas will be hand weeded as requested by the City . All weeding to be performed within seven (7 ) days of request . All pricing to be hourly rate for labor . 4 . GENERAL MAINTENANCE This includes but is not ln* nited. to the following : erosion repair, tree trimming and. or removal , reseeding chiding the use of erosion control blanket, or other essential maintenance repairs not covered under any specific line item . All prkin.g to be hourly rate for labor . All specific Jobs will be quoted as needed . 5 . BEAUTIFICATION 6, Planting of annual or perenul% al flowers , various size bushes or 3 " diameter trees as needed for replacement or new installation . All pricing gill be labor only to install . All tree/plant/shrub pricing will be negotiated separately . 6 . BILLI G/INVOICINGm All billing and invoicing will be done on a monthly basis with detailed itemized billing for each work item performed for each SSA subdivision area . Billing will fficlude the date the work item was perfonn.ed, the cost per work item and the total cost for the month . } i i 2 i I r I o wOOD TRAlL Lod co� ON w CYPRESS 1. � q�� U EET o Q Q m �- EQVO� a. ctiR . Q W o N Z � J LLJ ox will 2 Ld D LS b1�ILL CO) W WAY Cn Not to Scale SUNFLOWER ESTATES SUBDIVISION ' HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION PROPERTY or MW I � t r q �- STWND DR . LSH TO 1 0 Y 1AJ _ 1111 6w CLE Sunflower Park at - OR1VE . 0 cc ' Now Ono tote: Existing woo s a F irrigation system r r,,, COLUMBINE OR rn will gat be maintained ,ter � I DR VE It r' r �-A ' -0, : 4%% It� • � _ • w ♦ Wr Y. i too � . u.... too S101' to , ' � 1 woo 00 • ti rAk J r r .,otj r f • /� +• IL *411 a I � . S- _ . _.- - ..- - - - - =-- • - - . ..____-_�- - -- - �'a NORTH .. Not to scale pMp/Md $"tr6.r 200 i i j I i FOX DILL ESTATES & SUNFLOWER ESTATES SSA BID FORM Y 1 I li CITY ESTIMATE Per Acre City Cost per Est . Cost Unit Quantity Estimate Cutting per Year AC 5 $ 50690 $250 . 00 $ 12 , 590400 AC 529 $ 50 . 00 $ 254 . 50 $ 1 3 , 225 . 00 VENDOR BID Per Acre Vendor Cost per Est. Cost Unit Quantity Biel Cutting per Year AC 5 SEE AC 5429 FHE i * Based on 28 cuttings , only an estimate for budgeting purposes for the City S FE = S unfiower Estated FHE = Fox Hill Estates CITY ESTIMATE ITEM UNIT Mulching CY $ 40wOO Weeding HR $ 40000 � Monument Repairs HR $ 40 . 90 General Maintenance HR $49 , 99 Beautification HR $49 . 90 VENDOR BID ITEM UNIT s Mulching CY Weeding HR Monument Repairs HR General Maintenance HR Beautification HR F t I A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 4 40 Legal ❑ PW#2 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ■ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ PW 2013-06 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ■ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Infrastructure Costs Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: Additional information on infrastructure costs associated with the Roads to Better Roads Program. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: PW 3/19/13 Action Taken: Moved forward to CC agenda. Item Number: PW 2013-06 Type of Vote Required: None, positive recommendation to move forward. Council Action Requested: Positive recommendation to proceed with plan through the budget process. Submitted by: Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Q Memorandum �` To: City Council Esr. 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator .t ! CC: Date: March 14, 2013 NcrAil Cc.city �� Subject: Infrastructure costs Summary Discussion of the five year Road to Better Roads program schedule, with focus on underground infrastructure costs. Background This item was discussed at the February Public Works committee meeting. At that meeting, staff presented the cost estimates for replacing and repairing underground utilities for the roadways selected by our pavement management study. In summary, the utility costs doubled or tripled the annual cost of the project. With that information known, we have reanalyzed the five year schedule based on those costs and our physical capacity to engineer and complete the improvements in a five-year period. That recommended plan is summarized in Eric Dhuse's memo, which is attached. At this point, the largest factor in our new five-year plan recommendation is cost. Eric and Brad's recommended plan gives us one more year to figure out the best way to fund the ongoing project. The original plan called for a number of roadways to be completed in summer 2013 that had large amounts of utilities below the roadway. Coincidentally, the original plan also had a number of roadways to be completed in summer 2014 that had very few underground utilities. So, we have proposed to switch the 2013 and 2014 schedule. This gives us $1 million worth of roadway improvements in 2013, and gives us one year to figure out how to totally fund the $2 million worth of roadway improvements in summer 2014. While we wanted to do all of the projects in the exact order our original analysis suggested, we think the new plan is better because it gives us more time to plan without severely impacting the overall plan and the cost efficiencies achieved. We do not expect any of the roadways originally scheduled to be completed in 2013 and now recommended to be scheduled in 2014 to significantly deteriorate over that timeframe, nor do we expect the cost efficiencies for those roads to be lost by postponing them an additional year. Our five year budget proposal for the water and sewer fund calls for modest drawdown on their respective fund balances each year for the next five years. In general, the water and sewer fund will both have 45-50% fund balances, even in FY 17 and FY 18. The new plan calls for a total of$7.6 million to be spent over the next five FYs, when we currently have only $5 million budgeted in our current FY 14 proposal. The breakdown of general fund(streets, storm and sidewalk costs)vs. water and sewer fund costs in the new plan shows that we need to fund about $1.75 million in water and $900,000 in the sewer fund. My initial thought is that we can fund the majority of the sewer costs in the sewer fund through deficit spending each year. For the water fund, we will likely need to fund the improvements through deficit spending and an increase in water rates. Again, with the new project schedule, we will have a year to analyze the project costs and make a determination for any water rate increase in March 2014 (to go into effect May 1, 2014). Recommendation Staff recommends committee approval of the new Road to Better Roads program schedule. If approved, we will take this schedule to the full City Council for adoption and inclusion in the FY 14 budget proposal. Memorandum . YDIN To : Public Works Committee ESQ° ` --� 1836 From : Eric Dhuse Director of Public Works CC : Bart Olson, Administrator 0 �®IL1 •� Counj Seat Brad Sanderson, Engineer " dam °` Date : March 12 , 2013 Subject : 5 Year road rehabilitation plan Request Summary To research and report back infrastructure costs associated the entire 5 year plan for the Roads to Better Roads project . Back round The City contracted with IMS and EEI to conduct a condition survey of our entire road system, street light system and sign system and prepare a detailed report outlining conditions and making recommendations for possible repairs or replacement . Analysis Working closely with EEI we developed a 5 year rehabilitation program based on the condition of the street , repair or replacement methods , and cost . At this time we are using $ 1 M per year for 5 years as our baseline . Within that $ 1 M we have money set aside for road maintenance , engineering and testing as well as street rehabilitation . While we were preparing the list, we were also asked to research the costs associated with replacing infrastructure if needed on the streets that were on the 5 year rehabilitation list . As it turns out , 17 of the 29 proposed streets need additional infrastructure replaced due to age or condition . While this does add significant cost , it is the prudent choice to replace the needed infrastructure now rather than waiting until the new streets are installed . To ensure we were getting the best value for our dollar , we ran many different scenarios using different rehabilitation criteria such as pavement depths , stone depths , micro paving , crack sealing and full depth road replacement . We decided to use the following criteria in the program to get cost estimates when we run the program . • Micro Surfacing - used on streets to create a stable surface and smooth out rutting and cracking . Usually 3 / 8 " thick but can be placed up to 1 1/2 " without milling . This y rehabilitation method is meant for streets in relatively good condition to prolong their useful life . • Mill 2 " of asphalt and replace with 2 1/2 " of new asphalt - used where criteria will allow to reduce costs and still have a strong , long lasting wearing surface . The Base of the road must be in good condition to use this rehabilitation method . • Mill 3 " of asphalt, replace with 3 1/2 " of new asphalt - this method is used where the condition of the road dictates that the thicker replacement of pavement will be more beneficial than the lesser amount of asphalt . This is by far the most used method in our model . • Full depth replacement of asphalt and stone base - used only in situations where there is complete failure of the base under the road . This is by far the most expensive method and will only be used where absolutely necessary . Recommendations I have attached spreadsheets outlining the suggested streets along with the year of construction and cost estimates . We are recommending that the first two years be switched to allow us to begin this year because only 1 out of the 5 proposed streets has any infrastructure improvements whereas 4 out of 7 streets have infrastructure improvements needed that were planned for 2013 . We would also recommend that the scheduled maintenance be pushed to the second year to allow us to rehabilitate East Somonauk Street from Colton St . to McHugh Rd . This street was not on the plan this year , but this winter devastated the road surface to a point where we need to 1 move it up on the list . The same thing happened on McHugh Road in 2008 , we had to perform an emergency grind and pave due to the severe deterioration over the winter . That project was from Spring St . to Martin Ave . which was paved originally the same time as Somonauk Street . We also delayed 4 street rehabilitations that were originally in the 5 year plan . Unfortunately the cost of storm sewer , sidewalk and misc . are not covered by the water or sewer department and will be taken out of the Roads to Better Roads prof ect funds . We feel that the streets chosen to wait longer than 5 years are in good enough shape to do so . If the bids come in low, or we find more money to spend on the program , they can be moved back to the list very easily . I would ask that this item be placed on the March 19 , 2013 Public Works Committee agenda for discussion . If you have any questions or need further information, please don ' t hesitate to ask . " X PROJECT SCHEDULE � IM PROPOSED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS c 14 United City of Yorkville , IL March 12 , 2013 DRAFT Year: 2013 1 2014 1 2015 2016 2017 Month :1 J I F I M I A I M I JIJIAISIOINIDIJIFIMIAIMI J I J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O ' N D J ; F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D ' Einal in City FY: mom lans , Specifications and Estimates • U I ' Bid ding and Contracting • - 9 Eel Construction G:1Public\Yorkville\20131YO1300-C City of Yorkville - GenerallEng1[Project Schedule - 2013 Road Progra m.x Is]Project Schedule Legend IEPA Submittal and Review Bidding and Contracting Final Design Construction TH ) WATER MAIN AGE ( LENG i UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE i 442 , 661 450 , 000 _ m�.rym 400 , 000 ui 350 , 000 F- 300 , 000 o 0 { UL- 250, 000 { z 200 , 000 1355358 `�' 150 , 000 � Q 100, 000 56008 50 , 000 4 1 78 8 , 339 i r > 2000 1999 1990 1989 1980 1979 - 1970 1969 - 1960 1959 - 1950 PRE 1949 YEAR WATER MAIN INSTALLED 13 , 478 19, 664 8 , 339 WATER MAIN E AG UNITED CITY O YORKVILLE �4 23 , 176 56, 008 YEAR WATER MAIN INSTALLED x 2000 x ,. 1999 - 1990 } rM 1989 - 1980 1979 1970 .. 1969A960 4 � qty' III Ir 1959A950 50 i a t PRE 1949 , lv a. n ; i i i 1 i h V y } !sxtwa^xx�t - xuawr.�'m�asrev'.¢vcrmvars:ex .cn.. .n .vtixa.:mas..eaWU:n+. .-+:-na .. z. - y4xrwwtvaLVWxa-cerow+�..-.. +v1. �m-..x.Dies'�'.a`.`cRC+.a--ix-.'�c�-s'e mh-LTln�ver..w*wx+�ws*T¢�++e+ n"�a..�aim�-a'- •cram. CAST IRON VS DIP WATER MA IN ( LENGTH ) UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE DIP ( POST 1980 ) CAST IRON ( PRE 1980 ) 601 , 195 %% %% % % % 5 Year Roads to Better Roads Costs 2013 Street Street Stations Cost Proposed Year Cost Water Sewer Storm Sidewalk Misc Bristol Avenue From E . Somonauk St To North End $ 326, 280 . 00 2015 $ 119, 940 . 00 $ 2061340 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0400 $ 0 . 00 Leisure Street From Prairie Ln To Sunset Ave $ 132, 877 . 00 2014 $ 132, 877 . 00 McHugh Road From E . Main St To N . of E . Spring St $ 164, 799 . 00 2014 $ 164, 799 . 00 Walnut Street From Rt . 47 To City Limits $ 198, 391 . 00 2014 $ 198, 391 . 00 $ 1, 042, 20100 $ 835, 863 . 00 $ 2061340 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0400 5 Year Roads to Better Roads Costs 2014 Street Street Stations Cost Proposed Year Cost Water Sewer Storm Sidewalk Misc Adrian Street From W . Washington To Blaine $467, 638 . 00 2013 $ 133 , 261 . 00 $ 224, 200 . 00 $ 108, 800000 $ 0000 $ 0 . 00 $ 0600 West Ridge Street From S . Main St To West End $ 672, 037 . 00 2015 $ 196, 237 . 00 $ 3021100000 $ 133 , 700 . 00 $ 30, 000 . 00 $ 10, 000 . 00 $ 0400 Heustis Street From E . Fox St To E . Orange St $ 285, 565 . 00 2013 $ 53 , 909 . 00 $ 133 , 000 . 00 $49, 000 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 34, 656 . 00 $ 15, 000 . 00 Jackson Street From Bristol Ave To Freemont St $ 75, 844. 00 2013 $ 57, 344 . 00 $0000 $ 0600 $ 0 . 00 $ 16, 500 . 00 $ 0000 Morgan Street From W . Fox St To W . Dolph St $ 316, 706 . 00 2013 $ 78, 176 . 00 $ 186, 390 . 00 $ 52, 140 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 West Hydrualic Avenue From Morgan St To West End $ 73 , 136 . 00 2013 $ 73 , 136 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $0 . 00 $0 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0400 West Van Emmon Street From S . Main St To State St $ 52, 602 . 00 2015 $ 52, 602 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0 . 00 $ 0000 $0000 Street Maintenance Costs $ 1001000 . 00 $ 100, 000800 $ 2, 043 , 528 . 00 $ 744, 665 . 00 $ 845 , 690 . 00 $ 343 , 640 . 00 $ 30, 000 . 00 $ 61, 156 . 00 $ 15, 000 . 00 5 Year Roads to Better Roads Costs 2015 Street Street Stations Cost Proposed Year Cost Water Sewer Storm Sidewalk Misc Appletree Court From Rt , 47 To West End $ 197, 939 . 00 2015 $ 51, 769 . 00 $ 89, 680 . 00 $49, 590 . 00 $4, 500 . 00 $ 2,400 . 00 $ 0 . 00 Center Parkway From Countryside Prky To Kendall Dr $ 647 , 109 . 00 2013 $ 228, 289 . 00 $408, 500 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0 . 00 $ 101320 . 00 $0000 North Conover Court From Strawberry Ln To North End $402, 071 . 00 2015 $41, 201 . 00 $ 289, 370 . 00 $ 64, 500 . 00 $ 0800 $ 7, 000 . 00 $ 0200 South Conover Court From Strawberry Ln To South End $ 32, 208 . 00 2015 $ 32, 208 . 00 combined with Conover Ct . North East Fox Street From Mill St To Bell St $ 150, 978 . 00 2015 $ 78, 958 . 00 $ 66, 500 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 5 , 520 . 00 $ 0400 East Washington Street From Rt, 47 To Mill St $ 280, 169 . 00 2015 $ 76, 533 . 00 $ 118, 750 . 00 $ 72,490 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 12, 396 . 00 $ 0 . 00 King Street From W . Main St To W . Somonauk St $ 120, 229 . 00 2015 $ 111, 029 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0400 $ 9, 200 . 00 $0600 $ 0000 Sanders Court From E . Main St To North End $ 83 , 699 . 00 2015 $ 83 , 699 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0400 $ 0 . 00 $0 . 00 Street Maintenance Costs $ 1001000400 $ 1001000400 $ 2, 014,402 . 00 $ 803 , 686 . 00 $ 972, 800 . 00 $ 186, 580000 $ 13 , 700 . 00 $ 37, 636 . 00 $0400 5 Year Roads to Better Roads Costs 2016 Street Street Stations Proposed Year Cost Water Sewer Storm Sidewalk Misc Church Street From River St To W . Somonauk St $440, 624 . 00 2016 $ 156, 364. 00 $ 254, 980 . 00 $ 29, 280 . 00 State Street From W . Madison St To Beecher St $447, 199 . 00 2016 $ 222, 099 . 00 $ 0400 $ 176, 100 . 00 $ 25, 000 . 00 $ 24, 000 . 00 $ 0 . 00 West Washington Street From Rt . 47 To West End $ 620, 719 . 00 2016 $ 157, 919 . 00 $ 3231000000 $ 124, 800 . 00 $ 15, 000 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0 . 00 Powers Court From W . Kendall Dr To East End $ 179 , 763000 2015 $44, 81100 $ 89, 300 . 00 $42, 050 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 3 , 600 . 00 $ 0 . 00 Street Maintenance Costs $ 100, 000 . 00 $ 1001000400 $ 11788, 305 . 00 $ 681, 195 . 00 $ 667, 280 . 00 $ 342, 950600 $40, 000400 $ 56, 880 . 00 $ 0400 5 Year Roads to Better Roads Costs 2017 Street Street Stations Cost Proposed Year Cost Water Sewer Storm Sidewalk Misc East Orange Street From Mill St To East End $ 195 , 697 . 00 2017 $ 78, 537 . 00 $ 107, 160 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 10, 000000 $0000 $0000 East Spring Street From Liberty To Quincey Rd $452, 876 . 00 2017 $452, 876 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0400 $0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 Street Maintenance Costs $ 1001000400 $ 100, 000400 $ 748, 573 . 00 $ 631, 41100 $ 1071160 . 00 $0200 $ 101000800 $ 0000 $ 0 . 00 5 Year Total Rehabilitation Costs $ 7,637, 011 . 00 $ 3, 696, 822. 00 $2,799, 270 .00 $ 873, 170 .00 $93,700 . 00 $ 155,672 .00 $ 15, 000 . 00 5 Year Roads to Better Roads Costs Streets Moved to Later Years Diehl Farm Road From Rt , 34 To John St 132,423 . 00 2016 $ 132,423 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0400 $ 0400 $ 0600 $ 0 . 00 Cannonball Trail From Rt . 34 To John St 168, 070 . 00 2014 $ 168, 070 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0600 $ 0400 $ 0400 $ 0 . 00 Burning Bush Drive From Walsh Dr To West End 78, 965 . 00 2014 $ 78, 965 . 00 $ 0200 $ 0000 $ 0400 $ 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 Tower Lane From Somonauk St To North End 50, 060 . 00 2013 $42, 560 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0400 $ 7, 500 . 00 $ 297, 095 . 00 $ 289, 595 . 00 $ 0000 $ 0800 $ 0000 $ 0000 $ 7, 500 . 00 Street Projects That Need Serious Consideration Due to Deterioration Street Stations Cost East Somonauk Street From Colton St To McHugh Rd $ 219, 856 . 00 2013 East Kendall Drive Countryside Parkway Center Parkway $ 974, 276 . 00 2014 West Kendall Drive Center Parkway Center Parkway $ 1, 777, 120 . 00 2015 FIVE -YEAR REHABILITATION PLAN UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 2013 E: 2013 STREET REHABILITATION LIST STREET FROM TO LENGTH COST ADRIAN ST BLAINE ST W WASHINGTON ST 17210 $ 133 , 261 CENTER PKWY W COUNTRYSIDE P W KENDALL DR 21146 $228 , 289 H E U ST I S ST E ORANGE ST E FOX ST 722 $53 ) 909 HYDRAULIC AVE W MORGAN ST WEST END 653 $737136 JACKSON ST BRISTOL AVE FREEMONT ST 768 $57 4 MORGAN ST W FOX ST W DOLPH ST 17047 $78 , 176 P TOWER LN EAST END W SOMONAU K ST 380 $4 TOTAL $666 , 675 2013 STREET MAINTENANCE LIST ALICA AVE CANNONBALL TRL FAXON RD 2 , 337 $36 , 000 E . BARBERRY CIR WALSH DR WALSH DR 1 , 596 $20 , 000 W . BARBERRY CIR WALSH DR WALSH DR 11907 $23 , 138 COTTONWOOD TRL JOHN ST JOHN ST 2 , 251 $26 , 000 TOTAL $ 1059138 ENGINEERING TOTAL (20%) $ 154 ,370 2013 TOTAL $9269183 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES , INC . SUGAR GROVE , IL APPENDIX 4 COPYRIGHT 2013 PAGE 1 OF 5 - r FIVE -YEAR REHABILITATION PLAN I'll , UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 2013 2014 STREET REHABILITATION LIST STREET FROM TO LENGTH COST BURNING BUSH DR WALSH DR WEST END 718 $78 , 965 CANNONBALL TRL W VETERANS PKWY JOHN ST 686 $ 168 , 070 FAXON RD DS@ 1320E CITY L HIGH RIDGE LN 171 $ 15 , 082 LEISURE ST PRAIRIE LN SUNSET AVE 11185 $ 1327877 MCHUGH RD E SPRING ST E MAIN ST 837 $ 1237039 WALNUT ST N BRIDGE ST CITY LIMIT 1 , 687 $ 1987391 i TOTAL $7169424 2014 STREET MAINTENANCE LIST BEAVER ST S . BRIDGE ST DEER ST 17460 $22 , 000 DEER ST WOLF ST SCHOOLHOUSE RD 1792 $25 , 000 REMAINING STREETS TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON IMS RECOMMENDATIONS AFTER 2013 DATA INPUT $53 , 000 TOTAL $ 100 , 000 ENGINEER TOTAL (20%) $ 1635290 2014 TOTAL $9795714 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES , INC . SUGAR GROVE , IL APPENDIX 4 COPYRIGHT 2013 PAGE 2 OF 5 FIVE -YEAR REHABILITATION PLAN 11 Al A, UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 2013 2015 STREET REHABILITATION LIST STREET FROM TO LENGTH COST APPLETREE CT N BRIDGE ST WEST END 387 $517769 BRISTOL AVE E SOMONAUK ST NORTH END 1 , 457 $ 1197940 CONOVER CT N NORTH END S CONOVER CT 308 $41 , 201 CONOVER CT S N CONOVER CT SOUTH END 328 $32 , 208 FOX ST E MILL ST BELL ST 771 $787958 i KING ST W MAIN ST W SOMONAUK ST 915 $ 111 , 029 E I POWERS CT W KENDALL DR NORTH END 335 $44 , 813 RIDGE ST W MORGAN ST EAST END 426 $527602 SANDERS CT E MAIN ST NORTH END 581 $ 83 , 699 VAN EMMON ST W S MAIN ST STATE ST 259 $347646 WASHINGTON ST E W WASHINGTON ST MILL ST _ 1 , 033 $76533 TOTAL $727 ,399 2015 STREET MAINTENANCE LIST STREETS TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON IMS RECOMMENDATIONS AFTER 2014 DATA INPUT $ 100 , 000 TOTAL $ 1009000 ENGINEERING TOTAL (20%) $ 1659480 2015 TOTAL $9929879 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES , INC . SUGAR GROVE , IL APPENDIX 4 COPYRIGHT 2013 PAGE 3 OF 5 FIVE -YEAR REHABILITATION PLAN DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 2013 2016 STREET REHABILITATION LIST STREET FROM TO LENGTH COST CHURCH ST W SOMONAUK ST W RIVER ST 1 , 342 $ 156 , 364 DIEHL FARM RD JOHN ST W VETERANS PKWY 981 $ 132 , 423 STATE ST W MADISON ST W BEECHER ST 1 , 962 $222 , 099 WASHINGTON ST W EAST END E WASHINGTON ST 1 , 827 $ 157 , 919 a TOTAL $668 , 805 2016 STREET MAINTENANCE LIST STREETS TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON IMS RECOMMENDATIONS AFTER 2015 DATA INPUT $ 1002000 TOTAL $ 1009000 ENGINEERING TOTAL (20%) $ 153 ,770 2016 TOTAL $9229575 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES , INC . SUGAR GROVE , IL APPENDIX 4 PAGE 4 OF 5 COPYRIGHT 2013 FIVE -YEAR REHABILITATION PLAN UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS FEBRUARY 2013 2017 STREET REHABILITATION LIST STREET FROM TO LENGTH COST ORANGE ST E MILL ST EAST END 564 $787537 SPRING ST E LIBERTY ST QUINSEY RD 31120 $446 , 876 TOTAL $525 , 413 2017 STREET MAINTENANCE LIST I i STREETS TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON IMS RECOMMENDATIONS AFTER 2016 DATA INPUT $ 100 , 000 I TOTAL $ 1003000 ENGINEERING TOTAL (20%) $ 1255090 2017 TOTAL $7505503 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES , INC . SUGAR GROVE , IL APPENDIX 4 COPYRIGHT 2013 PAGE 5 OF 5 1 I o� Memorandum To : Public Works Committee EST , 1836 From : Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works �� r .� CC : Bait Olson, Administrator O� -° :::_ January 23 Date: Y� O y , 2013 Subject : infrastructure costs <kE i Committee members, During the road study process staff was asked to look into the additional costs to replace Infrastructure such as water main, sanitary and storm sewers and sidewalk. I have been working with EEI to come up with estimates for each of the projects that are in the first year of the 5 year program. Please find the estimates attached with a very brief description of the infrastructure that needs to be replaced. I i Please find below a more detailed description of each of the projects . Adrian St. " Blaine to West Washington. I • This subdivision was constructed between 1957- 1961 as part of Fourmont' s and Fourmont' s second addition -to Yorkville. Currently there is a 6" cast iron water main which is at the end of its estimated useful life span of 35 -40 years. The estimated useful life span of service lines is 30-50 years, so the current services are at the end of their life span as well. This also includes abandoning a water main that currently runs in the side yards of houses that connects Adrian street water main to the Main St. water main and replacing it with a main that extends from the current location to Blaine St. • The sanitary sewer is currently S " clay pipe which was called out on the 2007 YBSD INI study as a main that needed to be lined . At the same we would line all of the existing services as well. i �I I Center Parkway - from West Countryside Parkway to West Kendall Drive • This was built as part of the Countryside Center subdivision in approximately 1973 - 1974 . + Currently there is an 8" cast iron water main that has had many breaks throughout the years of service and needs to be replaced. • There are no sanitary or storm issues that need to be addressed at this time. • I would estimate that between 500 -600 linear feet of sidewalk will need to be replaced. i i Heustis Street - from E. Fox St to E. Orange St. j i • This was platted as pant of Hopkins Addition to Yorkville in 1887 . The earliest I can find I that water main plans are from 1909 and I can not find any plans that show any replacement. That means that the water main has been in continuous service for 104 years. It is time to replace it and the services that are attached to it. • The sanitary sewer was identified in the YBSD INI study to be lined and the services reinforced . • The sidewalk will be replaced for the entire length of the project. In order to do this, we will have to remove parkway trees to be able to move the sidewalk onto public property from private property and to accommodate the widening of the roadway which is currently and average of 16 ' wide. i i Jackson St - From Bristol Ave. to Freemont St. j • This is a very straightforward street rehabilitation project. The only additional work would be 550 linear feet of sidewalk on the north side of the street. Morgan St. - from W. Fox St. to Dolph St. • Platted as Part of Atlee, Atlee II, and Fourmonts subdivisions between 1961 - 1967. i • Water main is currently 6" cast iron pipe and should be replaced along with the services . • Sanitary main was identified on the YBSD INI study to be lined. The services should be lined at the same time. i i i i i i i Conover Ct. South " from Strawberry to South end • Flatted as pant of Countryside Center and constructed ui 1973 - 1974. • There have been many breaks on all water mains in Countryside, all water main should be replaced . j • Approximately 75400 linear feet of sidewalk maybe replaced . i Tower Lane - from Somonauk St. to North end No additional infrastructure work needed. I I would ask that this be placed on the February 19th public works committee meeting for discussion. i i i I I I i i I i I i I i I i I� I ADRIAN STREET j From Blaine St. to W. Washington St. SIZE/ LENGTH WIDTH COST Street Costs Mill 3", pave 3.5" 1210 24 $ 133,26133 I Water Costs Main installed in 1957-1961 , replace all main and services to b-box 1180 8 $2241200.00 i Sewer Costs Main installed in 1957-1961 , line entire main and services to ROW 960 8 $281800,00 Sewer service lining @ $4000 per service x 20 services $803000.00 Storm Sewer $0.00 Sidewalk Completed in safe routes to school program $0600 MISC. Shoulder grading and landscape to improve drainage 2000 10 $ 1 , 377.41 $467163814 I CENTER PARKWAY i From W. Countryside Prky. To West Kendall Dr. SIZE/ LENGTH WIDTH COST Street Costs Mill 3", pave 3.5" 2146 26 $228, 289 I Water Costs installed 1973, cast iron, many breaks, replace all 2150 8 $408,500.00 Sewer Costs $0. 00 i Storm Sewer $0.00 no replacement needed Sidewalk 10% of overall length of project 430 4 $101320. 00 Misc. $647110933 I i HEUSTIS ST From East Orange St. To East Fox St. SIZE/ LENGTH WIDTH COST Street Costs Mill 3", pave 3.5" 722 16 $53, 909 Water Costs 700 8 $ 133,000.00 Sewer Costs j 300 8 $9,000600 Storm Sewer $0. 00 Sidewalk 1444 4 $34 , 656. 00 j Misc, tree rem/repl, landscaping 1444 8 $ 15, 000. 00 $245,565.33 i 'i JACKSON ST, From Bristol Ave. to Freemont St. SIZE/ LENGTH WIDTH COST Street Costs Mill 3"i pave 3. 5" 768 16 $57,344 Water Costs main installed in 1990, no replacement necessary $0. 00 Sewer Costs no repairs needed at this time $0,00 Storm Sewer $0.00 none needed at this time Sidewalk construct sidewalk on north side 550 5 $ 16,500. 00 Misc, landscape sidewalk installation area $2 , 000.00 $75,844.00 i i i i MORGAN ST. West Fox St. to Dolph St SIZE/ LENGTH WIDTH COST Street Costs Mill 3 , pave 3.5" 1047 16 $78, 176 Water Costs main installed between 1957-1961 replace all 981 8 $ 186,390. 00 Sewer Costs main installed between 1957-1961 VCR line all including services 538 8 $ 16, 140.00 Sewer service lining @ $4000 per service x 12 services $36,000 .00 Storm Sewer $0.00 none needed at this time Sidewalk installation in SRTS program $0. 00 Mi5C. li $0.00 $3161706.00 i CONOVER CT. SOUTH i Conover Ct. North to South End SIZE/ LENGTH WIDTH COST Street Costs Mill 311 , pave 3. 5" 328 24 $32,208 Water Costs installed 1973, cast iron , many breaks, replace all 670 8 $127 , 300400 Sewer Costs 280 8 $53,200600 Storm Sewer $0. 00 iSidewalk 75 4 $ 1 , 800. 00 Misc. $0.00 $214,508.29 i I I I I TOWER LANE . Somonauk St. to North End SIZE/ LENGTH WIDTH COST Street Costs Mill 311, pave 3.5" 380 24 $42,560 Water Costs None $0. 00 Sewer Costs None $0. 00 I Storm Sewer $0. 00 None Sidewalk None $0.00 i Mlsc . Drainage swale and Gravel Shoulder $7,500. 00 $50,060.00 TOTALS Street Costs $626,748 Water Costs $ 1 ,079,390. 00 Sewer Costs $223, 140. 00 Storm Sewer $0. 00 i Sidewalk $63,276. 00 Misc. $26,877.41 $2,017,432 i A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number `u 040 Legal ❑ ADM#1 Finance ■ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ ADM 2013-12 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Bond refinancing—Library 2005B and Countryside TIF Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Discussion and direction Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Q Memorandum �` To: City Council Esr. lass From: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: March 21, 2013 NcrAil Cc.city ALE ►�-�' Subject: Bond refinancings Summary Review of two refinancing proposals from the FY 14 budget proposal. Background This item is scheduled to be discussed at the March 21St Administration Committee meeting. This memo was drafted and this agenda item was scheduled prior to the Committee meeting; therefore, no written recommendation from the committee was provided. This was placed on the City Council agenda so that the City Council would be able to discuss it in detail during the FY 14 budget proposal agenda item, and so that the Library Bond could immediately move forward, should it be recommended for approval. Interest rates are starting to trend higher, and if the Committee recommends approval, we would seek authorization for a bond underwriter(Bernardi, authorization attached) at the March 26th City Council meeting and would have a bond ordinance available for City Council review and approval at the April 23rd City Council meeting. If the Committee does not recommend approval, this authorization does not need to be approved at this meeting. For the Countryside TIF bond, there is much more analysis and preparation prior to City Council authorization. We do seek your feedback on the concept of refinancing this bond, so that we may proceed with that work. Recommendation We recommend both bond refinancings be pursued. For the Library Bond and contingent upon positive recommendation by the Administration Committee, staff recommends approval of the engagement letter with Bernardi Securities. Q Memorandum �` To: City Council Esr. 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: February 14, 2013 NcrAil Cccity ALE ►�-�' Subject: Bond refinancing Summary Review of two bond refinancing proposals as proposed in the FY 14 budget. Background In the FY 14 budget proposal, we show the refinancing of the Countryside TIF bond and the Library construction bond(2005B). Prior to budget approval, and prior to moving forward with the official refinancing process, we are seeking discussion and direction by the Administration Committee. The detailed debt service schedule comparisons for both bonds are attached. For the Countryside TIF bond, we have also included a"before" and"after" Countryside TIF budget. The Library bond refinancing will result in a $50,000 annual savings and lower Library property taxes. The Countryside TIF refinancing is recommended for the purpose of saving the City money between when the TIF proceeds are paid to the developer for the opening of the movie theater and when the full value of the theater hits the tax rolls. Further, we recommended lengthening the bond to match the expiration of the TIF district. Further details and analysis will be given at the meeting. Recommendation Discussion and direction on whether to proceed with the bond refinancing. United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois General Obligation(ARS)Bonds,Series 2013 Partial Refunding of Series 2005 Aggregate Debt Service No Refunding Savings(Deficit) Series Series DATE 2013forPartialRef2005 2005PostRef2013 TOTAL 12/01/2013 25,500.00 260,287.50 285,787.50 302,738 16,951 12/Ol/2014 51,000.00 68,072.50 119,072.50 305,523 186,451 12/Ol/2015 51,000.00 68,072.50 119,072.50 302,723 183,651 12/01/2016 51,000.00 68,072.50 119,072.50 304,723 185,651 12/01/2017 51,000.00 68,072.50 119,072.50 306,323 187,251 12/Ol/2018 51,000.00 68,072.50 119,072.50 302,523 183,451 12/01/2019 51,000.00 303,072.50 354,072.50 303,073 (51,000) 12/01/2020 51,000.00 303,202.50 354,202.50 303,203 (51,000) 12/01/2021 51,000.00 307,912.50 358,912.50 307,913 (51,000) 12/01/2022 51,000.00 311,992.50 362,992.50 311,993 (51,000) 12/01/2023 51,000.00 310,305.00 361,305.00 310,305 (51,000) 12/01/2024 51,000.00 313,050.00 364,050.00 313,050 (51,000) 12/Ol/2025 461,000.00 - 461,000.00 - (461,000) 12/Ol/2026 459,600.00 459,600.00 (459,600) 12ro1/2027 457,600.00 457,600.00 - (457,600) Total $1,964,700.00 $2,450,185.00 $4,414,885.00 3,674,090 (740,795) Par Amounts Of Selected Issues Series 2013forPartialM2005 1,275,000.00 Series 2005PostRef2013 1,785,000.00 TOTAL 3,060,000.00 Aggregate 1 12/5/2012 1 8:38 AM Speer Financial, Inc. Public Finance Consultants Countryside TIF Fund (87) The Countryside TIF was created in February of 2005,with the intent of constructing a future retail development at Countryside Center. This TIF is located at the northwest corner of US Route 34 and IL Route 47. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 6,372 4,188 4,500 - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Investment Earnings 3,134 2,718 2,000 3,100 1,550 - - - - Total Revenue 9,506 6,906 6,500 3,100 1,550 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Expenditures Contractual Services 1,623 1,442 1,375 2,375 1,802,375 2,375 2,375 2,375 2,375 Debt Service 307,093 306,143 304,668 304,668 285,788 119,073 119,073 119,073 119,073 Total Expenditures 308,716 307,585 306,043 307,043 2,088,163 121,448 121,448 121,448 121,448 Surplus(Deficit) (299,210) (300,679) (299,543) (303,943) (2,086,613) (121,448) (21,448) (21,448) (21,448) Ending Fund Balance 2,178,550 1,877,872 1,578,277 1,573,929 (512,684) (634,131) (655,579) (677,026) (698,474) $3,000 Fund Balance N r m $2,000 ♦!. - N 3 $1,000 F $0 ($1,000) 110 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Countryside TIF 87-00040-00-4087 PROPERTY TAXES-COUNTRYSIDE TIF 6,372 4,188 4,500 - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 87-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 3,134 2,718 2,000 3,100 1,550 - - - Revenue 9,506 6,906 6,500 3,100 1,550 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 87-870-54-00-5420 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 1,248 1,067 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 87-870-54-00-5425 TIF INCENTIVE PAYOUT - - - - 1,800,000 - - - - 87-870-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 Debt Service-2005 Bond 87-870-80-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 170,000 175,000 180,000 180,000 185,000 - - - - 87-870-80-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 137,093 131,143 124,668 124,668 75,288 68,073 68,073 68,073 68,073 Debt Service-2013 Refunding Bond 87-870-93-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - - - - - - - 87-870-93-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - 25,500 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 Expenditures 308,716 307,585 306,043 307,043 29088,163 121,448 121,448 121,448 121,448 Surplus(Deficit) (299,210) (300,679) (299,543) (303,943) (2,086,613) (121,448) (21,448) (21,448) (21,448) Fund Balance 291789550 1,8779872 1,5789277 1,573,929 (5129684) (634,131) (6559579) (6779026) (698,474) 111 Countryside TIF Fund (87) The Countryside TIF was created in February of 2005,with the intent of constructing a future retail development at Countryside Center. This TIF is located at the northwest corner of US Route 34 and IL Route 47. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 6,372 4,188 4,500 - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Investment Earnings 3,134 2,718 2,000 3,100 1,550 - - - - Total Revenue 9,506 6,906 6,500 3,100 1,550 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Expenditures Contractual Services 1,623 1,442 1,375 2,375 1,802,375 2,375 2,375 2,375 2,375 Debt Service 307,093 306,143 304,668 304,668 302,738 305,523 302,723 304,723 306,323 Total Expenditures 308,716 307,585 306,043 307,043 2,105,113 307,898 305,098 307,098 308,698 Surplus(Deficit) (299,210) (300,679) (299,543) (303,943) (2,103,563) (307,898) (205,098) (207,098) (208,698) Ending Fund Balance 2,178,550 1,877,872 1,578,277 1,573,929 (529,634) (837,532) (1,042,630) (1,249,728) (1,458,426) $3,000 Fund Balance N r _ $2,000 + H c $1,000 s ~ $0 ($1,000) ($2,000) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Countryside TIF 87-000-40-00-4087 PROPERTY TAXES-COUNTRYSIDE TIF 6,372 4,188 4,500 - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 87-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 3,134 2,718 2,000 3,100 1,550 - - - Revenue 9,506 6,906 6,500 39100 1,550 - 100,000 1009000 100,000 87-870-54-00-5420 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 1,248 1,067 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 87-870-54-00-5425 TIF INCENTIVE PAYOUT - - - - 1,800,000 - - - - 87-870-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 Debt Service-2005 Bond 87-870-80-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 170,000 175,000 180,000 180,000 185,000 195,000 200,000 210,000 220,000 87-870-80-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 137,093 131,143 124,668 124,668 117,738 110,523 102,723 94,723 86,323 Debt Service-2013 Refunding Bond 87-870-93-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - - - - - - - 87-870-93-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - - - - - - - Expenditures 308,716 307,585 306,043 307,043 2,105,113 307,898 305,098 3079098 308,698 Surplus(Deficit) (299,210) (300,679) (299,543) (303,943) (2,103,563) (307,898) (2059098) (207,098) (208,698) Fund Balance 29178,550 19877,872 19578,277 1,5739929 (529,634) (837,532) (19042,630) (19249,728) (19458,426) United City of Yorkville, Kendall County,Illinois $6,790,000 Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 for $6,325,000 due 2014-2024 of remaining Series 2005B Bernardi Scale at 1-10-13 - Gross Funded Sources & Uses Dated 05/01/2013 1 Delivered 05/01/2013 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $6,790,000.00 Reoffering Premium 53,784.15 Total Sources $6,843,784.15 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.000%) 67,900.00 Costs of Issuance 85,000.00 Gross Bond Insurance Premium(100.0 bp) 79,846.68 Deposit to Net Cash Escrow Fund 6,609,125.00 Rounding Amount 1,912.47 Total Uses $6,843,784.15 Series 2013 for 2005B Ber I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 2/6/2013 1 3:08 PM Public Speer Financial, Inc. • 1954 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois $6,790,000 Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 for$6,325,000 due 2014-2024 of remaining Series 2005B Bernardi Scale at 1-10-13 - Gross Funded Debt Service Comparison Existing Date Total P+I PCF D/S Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 12/30/2013 291,487.78 (6,897.40) 348,400.00 632,990.38 632,525.00 (465.38) 12/30/2014 631,700.00 - 631,700.00 684,125.00 52,425.00 12/30/2015 652,200.00 652,200.00 703,125.00 50,925.00 12/30/2016 657,100.00 657,100.00 710,725.00 53,625.00 12/30/2017 666,700.00 666,700.00 717,325.00 50,625.00 12/30/2018 700,900.00 700,900.00 752,925.00 52,025.00 12/30/2019 709,200.00 709,200.00 762,950.00 53,750.00 12/30/2020 712,100.00 712,100.00 766,356.26 54,256.26 12/30/2021 733,460.00 733,460.00 783,375.00 49,915.00 12/30/2022 742,740.00 742,740.00 793,312.50 50,572.50 12/30/2023 744,040.00 744,040.00 795,537.50 51,497.50 12/30/2024 743,040.00 743,040.00 796,100.00 53,060.00 Total $7,984,667.78 (6,897.40) $348,400.00 $8,326,170.38 $8,898,381.26 $572,210.88 PV Analysis Summary(Net to Net) Gross PV Debt Service Savings 473,099.63 Effects of Primary Purpose Earnings 6,764.23 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 2.965%(AIC) 479,863.85 Contingency or Rounding Amount 1,912.47 Net Present Value Benefit $481,776.32 Net PV Benefit/ $6,325,000 Refunded Principal 7.617% Net PV Benefit/ $6,790,000 Refunding Principal 7.095% Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 5/01/2013 Refunding Delivery Date 5/01/2013 Series 2013 for 2005B Ber I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 216/2013 1 3:08 PM Public Speer Financial, Inc. • United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois $6,790,000 Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 for$6,325,000 due 2014-2024 of remaining Series 2005B Bernardi Scale at 1-10-13 - Gross Funded Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 12/30/2013 185,000.00 2.000% 106,487.78 291,487.78 12/30/2014 475,000.00 2.000% 156,700.00 631,700.00 12/30/2015 505,000.00 2.000% 147,200.00 652,200.00 12/30/2016 520,000.00 2.000% 137,100.00 657,100.00 12/30/2017 540,000.00 2.000% 126,700.00 666,700.00 12/30/2018 585,000.00 2.000% 115,900.00 700,900.00 12/30/2019 605,000.00 2.000% 104,200.00 709,200.00 12/30/2020 620,000.00 2.200% 92,100.00 712,100.00 12/30/2021 655,000.00 2.400% 78,460.00 733,460.00 12/30/2022 680,000.00 2.750% 62,740.00 742,740.00 12/30/2023 700,000.00 3.000% 44,040.00 744,040.00 12/30/2024 720,000.00 3.200% 23,040.00 743,040.00 Total $6,790,000.00 - $1,194,667.78 $7,984,667.78 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $46,887.81 Average Life 6.905 Years Average Coupon 2.5479285% Net Interest Cost(NIC) 2.5780341% True Interest Cost(TIC) 2.5666156% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.5950111% All Inclusive Cost(AIC) 2.9645566% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 2.4225618% Weighted Average Maturity 6.881 Years Series 2013 for 20058 Ber I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 2/6/2013 1 3:08 PM Public Speer Financial, Inc. • •- United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois $6,950,000 General Obligation Library Bonds, Series 2005B Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Refunded Refunded Refunded Date Bonds Interest D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest D/S 12/30/2013 6,325,000.00 284,125.00 6,609,125.00 - 4.000% 284,125.00 284,125.00 12/30/2014 - 400,000.00 4.000% 284,125.00 684,125.00 12/30/2015 435,000.00 4.000% 268,125.00 703,125.00 12/30/2016 460,000.00 4.000% 250,725.00 710,725.00 12/30/2017 485,000.00 4.000% 232,325.00 717,325.00 12/30/2018 540,000.00 4.625% 212,925.00 752,925.00 12/30/2019 575,000.00 4.625% 187,950.00 762,950.00 12/30/2020 605,000.00 4.625% 161,356.26 766,356.26 12/30/2021 650,000.00 4.625% 133,375.00 783,375.00 12/30/2022 - 690,000.00 4.750% 103,312.50 793,312.50 12/30/2023 725,000.00 4.750% 70,537.50 795,537.50 12/30/2024 760,000.00 4.750% 36,100.00 796,100.00 Total $6,325,000.00 $284,125.00 $6,609,125.00 $6,325,000.00 - $2,224,981.26 $8,549,981.26 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg.Life&Avg.Coupon Calculation 5/01/2013 Average Life 7.303 Years Average Coupon 4.6098610% Weighted Average Maturity(Par Basis) 7.303 Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 5/01/2013 Refunding Delivery Date 5/01/2013 Series 2005B for 2012 Ref I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 2/6/2013 1 3:08 PM Speer Financial, Public •nsultants Since 1954 Page 4 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois $6,790,000 Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 for$6,325,000 due 2014-2024 of remaining Series 2005B Bernardi Scale at 1-10-13 - Gross Funded Escrow Fund Total Principal + Interest Date Principal Rate Interest Total P+I 05/01/2013 - - - - 06/30/2013 142,016.00 0.080% 18.67 142,034.67 12/30/2013 6,457,664.00 0.160% 6,878.73 6,464,542.73 Total $6,599,680.00 - $6,897.40 $6,606,577.40 Series 2013 for 2005B Ber I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 2/6/2013 1 3:08 PM Public Speer Financial, Inc. • United City of Yorkville,Kendall County, Illinois $6,790,000 Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 for$6,325,000 due 2014-2024 of remaining Series 2005B Bernardi Scale at 1-10-13 - Gross Funded Escrow Fund Adjusted Receipts Zero Date Total P+I Coupon Reinvestment Net P+I 05/01/2013 - (2,547.00) - (2,547.00) 06/30/2013 142,034.67 (1,000.00) 1,028.00 142,062.67 12/30/2013 6,464,542.73 2,519.00 6,467,061.73 Total $6,606,577.40 (3,547.00) $3,547.00 $69606,577.40 Series 2013 for 2005B Ber I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 2/6/2013 1 3:08 PM Speer Financial, Inc. Public Finance Consultants Since 1954 g- United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois $6,790,000 Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 for $6,325,000 due 2014-2024 of remaining Series 2005B Bernardi Scale at 1-10-13 - Gross Funded Escrow Fund Cashflow Date Net P+I -Transfers Receipts Disbursements Cash Balance 05/01/2013 (2,547.00) 6,898.00 - 6,898.00 06/30/2013 142,062.67 (18.67) 142,044.00 142,062.50 6,879.50 12/30/2013 6,467,061.73 (6,878.73) 6,460,183.00 6,467,062.50 - Total $6,606,577.40 (6,897.40) $6,609,125.00 $6,609,125.00 - Investment Parameters Investment Model[PV,GIC,or Securities] Securities Default investment yield target Bond Yield Cash Deposit 9,445.00 Cost of Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds 6,599,680.00 Total Cost of Investments $6,609,125.00 Target Cost of Investments at bond yield $6,498,770.13 Yield to Receipt 0.1599327% Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.5950111% State and Local Government Series(SLGS)rates for 2/04/2013 Series 2013 for 2005B Ber I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 2/6/2013 1 3:08 PM Public Speer Financial, Inc. • m 0 United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois $6,950,000 General Obligation Library Bonds, Series 2005B Total Refunded Debt Service Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 12/30/2013 - 4.000% 284,125.00 284,125.00 12/30/2014 400,000.00 4.000% 284,125.00 684,125.00 12/30/2015 435,000.00 4.000% 268,125.00 703,125.00 12/30/2016 460,000.00 4.000% 250,725.00 710,725.00 12/30/2017 485,000.00 4.000% 232,325.00 717,325.00 12/30/2018 540,000.00 4.625% 212,925.00 752,925.00 12/30/2019 575,000.00 4.625% 187,950.00 762,950.00 12/30/2020 605,000.00 4.625% 161,356.26 766,356.26 12/30/2021 650,000.00 4.625% 133,375.00 783,375.00 12/30/2022 690,000.00 4.750% 103,312.50 793,312.50 12/30/2023 725,000.00 4.750% 70,537.50 795,537.50 12/30/2024 760,000.00 4.750% 36,100.00 796,100.00 Total $6,325,000.00 - $2,224,981.26 $8,549,981.26 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg.Life&Avg.Coupon Calculation 5/01/2013 Average Life 7.303 Years Average Coupon 4.6098610% Weighted Average Maturity(Par Basis) 7.303 Years Refunding Bond Information Refunding Dated Date 5/01/2013 Refunding Delivery Date 5/01/2013 Series 20058 for 2012 Ref I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 2/612013 1 3:08 PM Speer Financial, Inc. Public Finance Consultants Since 1954 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois $6,790,000 Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 for $6,325,000 due 2014-2024 of remaining Series 2005B Bernardi Scale at 1-10-13 - Gross Funded Summary Of Bonds Refunded of Maturity Issue Maturity Type Bond Coupon Value Call Date Call Price Dated 12/30/2011 1 Delivered 12/30/2011 Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2014 Serial Coupon 4.000% 400,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2015 Serial Coupon 4.000% 435,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2016 Serial Coupon 4.000% 460,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2017 Serial Coupon 4.000% 485,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2018 Serial Coupon 4.625% 540,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2019 Serial Coupon 4.625% 575,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2020 Serial Coupon 4.625% 605,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2021 Serial Coupon 4.625% 650,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2022 Serial Coupon 4.750% 690,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2023 Serial Coupon 4.750% 725,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2024 Serial Coupon 4.750% 760,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Subtotal - - $6,325,000 - - Total - - $6,325,000 - - Series 2013 for 2005B Ber I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 2/6/2013 1 3:08 PM Public Speer Financial, Inc. • United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois $6,790,000 Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 for $6,325,000 due 2014-2024 of remaining Series 2005B Bernardi Scale at 1-10-13 - Gross Funded Refunding Summary Part 1 of 2 Dated 05/01/2013 1 Delivered 05/01/2013 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $6,790,000.00 Reoffering Premium 53,784.15 Total Sources $6,843,784.15 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (1.000%) 67,900.00 Costs of Issuance 85,000.00 Gross Bond Insurance Premium(100.0 bp) 79,846.68 Deposit to Net Cash Escrow Fund 6,609,125.00 Rounding Amount 1,912.47 Total Uses $6,843,784.15 Flow of Funds Detail State and Local Government Series(SLGS)rates for 2/04/2013 Date of OMP Candidates Net Cash Escrow Fund Solution Method Gross Funded Total Cost of Investments $6,609,125.00 Interest Earnings @ 0.160% 6,897.40 Total Draws $6,609,125.00 Issues Refunded And Call Dates Series 2005B for 2012 Ref 12/30/2013 PV Analysis Summary(Net to Net) Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 2.965%(AIC) 479,863.85 Contingency or Rounding Amount 1,912.47 Net Present Value Benefit $481,776.32 Net PV Benefit/ $6,325,000 Refunded Principal 7.617% Net PV Benefit/ $6,790,000 Refunding Principal 7.095% Series 2013 for 20058 Ber I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 2/6/2013 1 3:08 PM Public Speer Financial, Inc. • 10 United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois $6,790,000 Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 for $6,325,000 due 2014-2024 of remaining Series 2005B Bernardi Scale at 1-10-13 - Gross Funded Refunding Summary Part 2 of 2 Dated 05/01/2013 1 Delivered 05/01/2013 Bond Statistics Average Life 6.905 Years Average Coupon 2.5479285% Net Interest Cost(NIC) 2.5780341% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.5950111% True Interest Cost(TIC) 2.5666156% All Inclusive Cost(AIC) 2.9645566% Series 2013 for 2005B Ber I SINGLE PURPOSE 1 2/6/2013 1 3:08 PM Public Speer Financial, Inc. • ADM#la BERNARDISECURITIESE MUNICIPAL BOND SPECIALISTS Mr. Gary J. Golinski, Mayor United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 March 19, 2013 Dear Mayor Golinski, Bernardi Securities,Inc., acting as Underwriter (the "Underwriter"), anticipates structuring and underwriting General Obligation Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 (the "Bonds") on behalf of United City of Yorkville (the "Issuer") for the purpose of refunding a portion of the Issuer's outstanding debt and paying for the costs of issuance associated with the Bonds. We understand that Speer Financial, Inc. is the City's financial advisor acting in a fiduciary capacity. This contract will serve as the Underwriter's authorization to structure and underwrite the Bonds and to prepare all necessary documents in connection with the issuance of the bonds unless otherwise directed. At such time as the Issuer has approved all of the documents and proceedings related to the issuance of the Bonds,the Underwriter will be expected to submit a detailed purchase agreement to the Issuer for execution that includes, among other things, final interest rates, dated date, principal maturity dates, interest payment dates, and other closing documents for issuing the Bonds. All costs of issuance are to be paid from Bond proceeds and, as applicable, other funds. These costs include but are not limited to: legal fees,trustee fees, if any, paying agent/bond registrar fees, book-entry setup charges, escrow verification fees, if any, escrow agent fees, if any, CUSIP costs, and any rating and bond insurance fees. Bernardi Securities, Inc.'s underwriting fee will also be paid from Bond proceeds and shall not exceed 1.25% of the par amount of the Bonds. The rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board require us to inform you that compensation that is contingent on the closing of a transaction or the size of a transaction presents a conflict of interest. While this form of compensation is customary in the municipal securities market, it may cause the Underwriter to recommend an offering that is unnecessary or to recommend the size of the proposed offering be larger than necessary. In recent years, Congress has enacted legislation seeking to reform financial markets in the wake of the 2008-2009 financial crisis. One of the most prominent pieces of legislation is the Dodd- Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The implementation of Dodd-Frank has led to a series of regulatory changes governing municipal securities. The 2011 amendments to Rule G-23, and the 2012 amendments to Rule G-17, of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) require Bernardi Securities, Inc. to define its role at the earliest stages of our relationship with you for this issue. 20 South Clark Street, Suite 2700 - Chicago, Illinois 60603 - p. 312-726-7324-www.BernardiSecurities.com Member FIN RA/Member SIPC Bernardi Securities, Inc . will only serve as an underwriter. As an underwriter, we will be acting as a principal in a commercial, arms ' length transaction, and not as a municipal advisor, financial advisor, or fiduciary. At the Issuer' s request, Bernardi Securities, Inc. may provide incidental services, including advice as to the structure, timing, terms and other matters concerning the issuance of the Bonds . Please note the Bernardi Securities, Inc. would be providing such services in its capacity as underwriter and not as a financial advisor to the Issuer. As an underwriter, our purchase of securities will be with a view to distribute these securities to investors . It is important for you to understand that in this role Bernardi Securities, Inc. has financial and other interests that may differ from yours. MSRB Rule G- 17 requires us to deal fairly at all times with both municipal issuers and investors . Our duty to purchase securities from an issuer at fair and reasonable prices must be balanced with the duty to sell securities to investors at fair and reasonable prices . Bernardi Securities, Inc . will review the Issuer' s official statement for the Issuer' s securities in accordance with, and as part of, our responsibilities to investors under federal securities laws, as applied to the facts and circumstances of this transaction. As with any Bond issue, your obligation to pay principal and interest will be an obligation that will require you to make these payments no matter what budget constraints you encounter. Furthermore, to the extent that you agree in the Bond issue to rate covenants, additional bond tests or other financial covenants, these may constrain your ability to operate and to issue additional debt and, if you do not comply with these covenants, they can result in a failure to perform with respect to the Bond issue. If the Bond issue is structured as a tax-exempt obligation, this requires that you comply with various IRS requirements and restrictions relating to how you use and invest the proceeds of the Bond issue, how you use any facilities constructed or improved with proceeds of the Bond issue and other restrictions throughout the term of the Bond issue . These requirements and restrictions may constrain how you operate the financed facilities and may preclude you from capitalizing on certain opportunities . Further, violation of these requirements and restrictions can result in the Bond issue become taxable and may cause you to become liable to the Internal Revenue Service and or to the owners of the Bond issue . In addition, in the event of an audit of the Bond issue by the IRS, obtaining an independent review of IRS positions with which you legitimately disagree is difficult and may not be practicable . Bernardi Securities, Inc. is a full service securities firm and as such Bernardi Securities, Inc . and its affiliates may from time to time provide advisory, brokerage and other services and products to municipalities, other institutions, and individuals, including the Issuer, certain Issuer officials and employees, and potential purchasers of the Bonds . If these services are rendered, Bernardi Securities, Inc. may receive customary compensation, however, such services are not related to the proposed offering. In the ordinary course of fixed income trading business, Bernardi Securities, Inc . may purchase, sell, or hold a broad array of investments and may actively trade securities and other financial instruments, including the Bonds and other municipal bonds, for its own account and for the accounts of customers where Bernardi Securities, Inc. may receive a mark-up or mark-down. Such investments and trading activities may involve or relate to the offering or other assets, securities and/or instruments of the Issuer and/or persons and entities with relationships with the Issuer. Bernardi Securities, Inc. has not identified any additional potential or actual material conflicts that require disclosure . If potential or actual conflicts arise in the future, we will provide you with supplemental disclosures about them. The designation of Bernardi Securities, Inc. as underwriter applies solely to this issue. We encourage you to consult with your own legal, accounting, tax, financial and other advisors, as applicable, to the extent you deem appropriate. Accompanying this letter is a risk disclosure document describing financial characteristics and security structures of fixed rate municipal bonds as wells as a general description of certain financial risks pursuant to MSRB Rule G- 17 . If there is any aspect of the foregoing disclosures that requires further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact us . We understand that you have the authority to bind the Issuer by contract with us, and that you are not a party to any conflict of interest relating to the proposed Bond offering. XLaBEARDI SECURITIES , INC, mberti Senior Vice President ACCEPTED BY: By Its Mayor ATTEST : By Its The above proposal accepted this date of , 2013 , by the action of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Illinois $61760,000 United City of lovkville,Kendall County,Illinois Geneml Obligation LiMmy Refunding Bands,Series 2013 S&P'BBB+"Undel lying Rating&BQ Bond Issue Table of Contents Report SourcesC Uses.......................................................................................................................................................................................... I DebtService Comparison................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 DebtService Schedule................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 DebtService To Maturity And To Call.................................................................................................................................................................... 4 EscrowFund Caslrflow.................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 PricingSunuuary......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 TotalRefimded Debt Service............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 PROOF OF GROSS D/S SAVINGS @ 3.2676320%............................................................................................................................................................. 8 SummaryOf Bonds Refiurded............................................................................................................................................................................... 9 RefundingSummanj...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 MSRBG-17 Disclosure....................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 RFdg Seties053.19.1d nd/SIn GUFORPOSE/317912013/2381"If Bernardi Securities, Inc. Preliminary $6,760,000 United City of Yollcville,Ice-tidal]County,Illinois GenesglObligation Libl-tyRefaundingBonds,Series 2013 S&P'BBBf"Undellyirlg Ratzi2g&BQ Bond Issare Sources&Uses Dated 05/15/2013 1 Delivered 05/15/2013 Sources Of hinds ParAmount of Bonds................................................................................................................................................................................ $6,760,000.00 ReofferingPremium.................................................................................................................................................................................. 16,674.75 TotalSources........................................................................................................................................................................................... $6,776,674.75 Uses Of Pands Total Underwriter's Discount (1.250%)................................................................................................................................................ 84,500.00 Costsof Issuance....................................................................................................................................................................................... 85,000.00 Depositto Net Cash Escrow Fund........................................................................................................................................................... 6,604,654.18 RoundingAmount..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,520.57 TotalUses.............................................................................................................................................................................................. $6,776,674.75 R£41q Seiies05 3.19.13 w//MACIT PURPOSE/311912013/9",q8 A14 Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 1 Preliminary $677607000 United City of Yollzville,Kendall County,Illinois GenezalObligation LibimyRefirndingBonds,Series 2013 S&P'BBB+"Underlying Rating&BQ Bond Issite Debt Service Comparison Date Total P+I Existing D/S Net New D/S Old Net D/S Savings 12/30/2013 178,371.88 348,400.00 526,771.88 632,525.00 105,753.12 12/30/2014 570,095.00 - 570,095.00 684,125.00 114,030.00 12/30/2015 597,295.00 - 597,295.00 703,125.00 105,830.00 12/30/2016 688,795.00 - 688,795.00 710,725.00 21,930.00 12/30/2017 713,295.00 - 713,295.00 717,325.00 4,030.00 12/30/2018 752,095.00 - 752,095.00 752,925.00 830.00 12/30/2019 758,675.00 - 758,G75.00 762,950.00 4,275.00 12/30/2020 763,240.00 - 763,240.00 7GG,356.26 3,11G.2G 12/30/2021 780,365.00 - 780,365.00 783,375.00 3;010.00 12/30/2022 789,815.00 - 789,815.00 793,312.50 3,497.50 12/30/2023 791,935.00 - 791,935.00 795,537.50 3,602.50 12/30/2024 791,775.00 - 791,775.00 796,100.00 4,325.00 Total $8,175,751.88 $348,400.00 $8,524,151.88 $8,898,381.26 $374,229.38 PV Analysis Summary(Net to Net) GrossPV Debt SeMce Savings......................................................................................................................................................................... 355,G40.47 Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 3.268%(AIC)..................................................................................................................................................... 355,640.47 Contingencyor Rounding Amount.................................................................................................................................................................. 2,520.57 NetPresent Value Benefit............................................................................................................................................................................... $358,161.04 Net PV Benefit/ $6,325,000 Refunded Principal......................................................................................................................................... 5.663% Net PV Benefit/ $6,760,000 Refunding Principal........................................................................................................................................ 5.298% Refunding Bond Information RefimdingDated Date.................................................................................................................................................................................... 5/15/2013 RefimdingDelivezy Date................................................................................................................................................................................. 5/15/2013 R&1g6etics053.19.13 u//MAICL6PUR7OS6/317912013/?'3S PW Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 2 Preliminary $6,760,000 United City of Yollcville,Kendall County,Illinois Genel alObli gatlonLiblvlyRefiindinyFonds, Set es2013 S&P'BBB* Undeilying Rating&BQ Bond Issue Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 1 2/30/2013 G5,000.00 2.000% 113,371.88 178,371.88 12/30/2014 390,000.00 2.000% 180,095.00 570,095.00 12/30/2015 425,000.00 2.000% 172,295.00 597,295.00 12/30/2016 525,000.00 2.000% 163,795.00 688,795.00 12/30/2017 560,000.00 2.000% 153,295.00 713,295.00 12/30/2018 610,000.00 2.200% 142,095.00 752,095.00 12/30/2019 630,000.00 2.450% 128,675.00 758,675.00 12/30/2020 650,000.00 2.750% 113,240.00 763,240.00 12/30/2021 685,000.00 3.000% 95,365.00 780,365.00 12/30/2022 715,000.00 3.200% 74,815.00 789,815.00 12/30/2023 740,000.00 3.400% 51,935.00 791,935.00 12/30/2024 765,000.00 3.500% 26,775.00 791,775.00 Total $6,760,000.00 - $1,415,751.88 $8,175,751.88 Yield Statistics BondYear Dollars....................................................................................................................................................................................... $48,390.00 AverageLife............................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.158 Years AverageCoupon.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2.9257117% NetInterest Cost(NIC)................................................................................................................................................................................. 3.0658754% TrueInterest Cost(TIC)................................................................................................................................................................................ 3.0651904% BondYield for Arbitrage Purposes.................................................................................................................................................................. 2.8673000% AllInclusive Cost(AIC)................................................................................................................................................................................ 3.2676320% IRS Form 8038 NetInterest Cost....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2.8886766% WeightedAverage Maturity............................................................................................................................................................................ 7.147 Years ,WS Seiies093.19,73 ii//S7n CLEFURFOSE/317912073/1.33 Pf4 Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 3 Preliminary $6,660,000 United City of Yorkville,Kendall Colulty,111inols Gene-nql Obligation LibiazyBouds,Series 2005B Callable 1213012013 @ 100°0 Debt Service To Maturity And To Call Refunded Date Refunded Bonds Interest D/S To Call Principal Coupon Interest Refunded D/S 12/30/2013 6,325,000.00 284,125.00 6,609,125.00 - 4.000% 284,125.00 284,125.00 12/30/2014 - 400,000.00 4.000% 284,125.00 684,125.00 12/30/2015 - 435,000.00 4.000% 268,125.00 703,125.00 12/30/2016 460,000.00 4.000% 250,725.00 710,725.00 12/30/2017 - 485,000.00 4.000% 232,325.00 717,325.00 12/30/2018 540,000.00 4.625% 212,925.00 752,925.00 12/30/2019 575,000.00 4.625% 187,950.00 762,950,00 12/30/2020 - 605,000.00 4.625% 161,356.26 766,356.26 12/30/2021 - 650,000.00 4.625% 133,375.00 783,375.00 12/30/2022 - 690,000.00 4.750% 103,312.50 793,312.50 12/30/2023 725,000.00 4.750% 70,537.50 795,537.50 12/30/2024 - - 760,000.00 4.750% 36,100.00 796,100.00 Total $6,325,000.00 $284,125.00 $62609,125.00 $6,325,000.00 - $2,224,981.26 $8,549,981.26 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg.Life&Avg Coupon Calculation...................................................................................................................................... 5/15/2013 Average Life.......................................................................................................................................................................... .. 7.265 Years ................ AverageCoupon.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4.8423766% WeightedAverage Maturity(Par Basis)........................................................................................................................................................ 7.265 Years Refunding Bond Information RefiurdingDated Date.................................................................................................................................................................................... 5/15/2013 RefundingDelivery Date.....................................................................................::.......::................................................................................. 5/15/2013 ;Sriies2003/SMIGLEPURPObE/ 311912013/2.38RH Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 4 Preliminary $6,760,000 United City of Yollzville,Kendall County,Illinols Genei al Obligation Lihi m y Refunding Bonds,Selles 2013 S&P'BBB+"Undei lying Rating 4-BQ Bond Issite Escrow Fund Cashflow Date Principal Rate Interest Receipts Disbursements Cash Balance 05/15/2013 - - 0.18 - 0.18 06/30/2013 142,052.00 0.060% 10.74 142,062.74 142,062.50 0.42 12/30/2013 6,462,602.00 0.110% 4,460.08 6,467,062.08 6,467,062.50 - Total $6,604,654.00 - $4,470.82 $6,609,125.00 $6,609,125.00 Investment Parameters InvestmeutModel[PV,GIC,or Securities].................................................................................................................................................... Securities Defaultinvestment yield target...................................................................................................................................................................... Bond Yield CashDeposit............................................................................................................................................................................................ 0.18 Cost of Investments Purchased with Bond Proceeds.................................................................................................................................... 6,604,654.00 TotalCost of Investments............................................................................................................................................................................... $6,604,654.18 Target Cost of hwestnients at bond yield...................................................................................................................................................... $6,494,567.15 Actualpositive or(negative)arbitrage...................................................................................,................................................................... (110,087.03) Yieldto Receipt........................................................................................................................................................................................ 0.1101958% Yieldfor Arbitrage Purposes........................................................................................................................................................................... 2.8673000% State and Local Government Series(SLGS)rates for.................................................................................................................................... 3/19/2013 Rfdg,Senes033.19.13 w//MAICLEFU.CFOSE/ 317512013/2:36 IM Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 5 Preliminary $6,760,000 United City of YoiYM11e,Kendall County,Illinois Cenel a1 Obligation Libi al y Refunding Bonds,Selles 2013 S&P'BBB+"Undellying Rating&$Q Bond Issue Pricing Summary Maturity Type of Bond Coupon Yield Maturity Value Price Dollar Price 12/30/2013 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.000% 65,000.00 100.621% 65,403.65 12/30/2014 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.150% 390,000.00 101.364% 395,319.60 12/30/2015 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.500% 425,000.00 101.281% 430,444.25 12/30/2016 Serial Coupon 2.000% 1.700% 525,000.00 101.049% 530,507.25 12/30/2017 Serial Coupon 2.000% 2.000% 560,000.00 100.000% 560,000.00 12/30/2018 Serial Coupon 2.200% 2.200% 610,000.00 100.000% 610,000.00 12/30/2019 Serial Coupon 2.450% 2.450% 630,000.00 100.000% 630,000.00 12/30/2020 Serial Coupon 2.750% 2.750% 650,000.00 100.000% 650,000.00 12/30/2021 Serial Coupon 3.000% 3.000% 685,000.00 100.000% 685,000.00 12/30/2022 Serial Coupon 3.200% 3.200% 715,000.00 100.000% 715,000.00 12/30/2023 Serial Coupon 3.400% 3.400% 740,000.00 100.000% c 740,000.00 12/30/2024 Serial Coupon 3.500% 3.500% 765,000.00 100.000% c 765,000.00 Total - - - $6,760,000.00 - - $6,776,674.75 Bid Information ParAmount of Bonds....................................................................................................................................................................................• $6,760,000.00 ReofferingPremium or(Discount)................................................................................................................................................................ 16,674.75 GrossProduction........................................................................................................................................................................................ $6,776,674.75 Total Underwriter's Discount (1.250%)....................................................................................................................................................... $(84,500.00) Bid(98.997%)........................................................................................................................................................................................... 6,692,174.75 TotalPurchase Price.................................................................................................................................................................................... $6,692,174.75 BondYear Dollars....................................................................................................................................................................................... $48,390.00 AverageLife............................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.158 Pears AverageCoupon.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2.9257117% NetInterest Cost(NIC)................................................................................................................................................................................. 3.0658754% TateInterest Cost(TIC)...........................................................................................................................................................I.................... 3.0651904% Ridg SclicsO53.19.13 n//MAICUT1IRMA'/3/1912013/Z:38 IM Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 6 Preliminary $6,660,000 United City of Yollzville,Kendall County,Illinois Gomm]Obligation LiblmyBonds,S'elles 2009E Callable 1213012013 @ 100% Total Refunded Debt Service Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 12/30/2013 - 4.000% 284,125.00 284,125.00 12/30/2014 400,000.00 4.000% 284,125.00 G84,125.00 12/30/2015 435,000.00 4.000% 268,1Z5.00 703,125.00 12/30/2016 460,000.00 4.000% 250,725.00 710,725.00 12/30/2017 485,000.00 4.000% 232,325.00 717,325.00 12/30/2018 540,000.00 4.625% 212,925.00 752,925.00 12/30/2019 575,000.00 4.625% 187,950.00 762,950.00 12/30/2020 605,000.00 4.625% 161,356.26 766,356.26 12/30/2021 650,000.00 4.625% 133,375.00 783,375.00 12/30/2022 690,000.00 4.750% 103,312.50 793,312,50 12/30/2023 725,000.00 4.750% 70,537.50 795,537.50 12/30/2024 760,000.00 4.750% 36,100.00 79G,100.00 Total $6,325,000.00 - $2,224,981.26 $8,549,981.26 Yield Statistics Base date for Avg.Life&Avg.Coupon Calculation....................................................................................................................................... 5/15/2013 AverageLife............................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.265 Years AverageCoupon.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4.8423766% WeightedAverage Maturity(Par Basis)......................................................................................................................................................... 7.265 Years Refunding Bond Information RefundingDated Date.................................................................................................................................................................................... 5/15/2013 RefundingDelivery Date................................................................................................................................................................................. 5/15/2013 sedes2009/RNGH-TURPOS6/ 311,912073/2:33Pia Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 7 Preliminary $6,760,000 United City of Yovkville,Kendall County,Illinois Genes-a1 Oblit Bonds, Seles 2013 g y f S&P'BBB f "Ulidellyuig Rahn,-&BQ Boyd Issue PROOF OF GROSS D/S SAVINGS @ 3.2676320% Date NEW GROSS D/S OLD GROSS D/S SAVINGS PV factor Present Value 05/15/2013 - - 1.000000Ox - 06/30/2013 - 142,062.50 142,062.50 0.9959567x 141,488.09 12/30/2013 178,371.88 142,062.50 (3G,309.38) 0,9799461x (35,581.24) 06/30/2014 90,047.50 142,062.50 52,015.00 0.9641930x 50,152.50 12/30/2014 480,047.50 542,OG2.50 62,015.00 0.9486931x 58,833.20 06/30/2015 86,147.50 134,062.50 47,915.00 0.9334424x 44,725.89 12/30/2015 511,147.50 569,OG2.50 57,915.00 0.9184368x 53,191.27 06/30/2016 81,897.50 125,362.50 43,465.00 0,9036725x 39,278.12 12/30/2016 606,897.50 585,362.50 (21,535.00) 0.8891455x (19,147.75) 06/30/2017 76,647.50 116,162.50 39,515.00 0.8748520x 34,569.78 12/30/2017 636,647.50 601,162.50 (35,485.00) 0.8607883x (30,545.07) 06/30/2018 71,047.50 106,462.50 35,415.00 0.8469507x 29,994.76 12/30/2018 681,047.50 646,462.50 (34,585.00) 0.8333355x (28,820.91) 06/30/2019 G4,337.50 93,975.00 29,637.50 0.8199392x 24,300.95 12/30/2019 694,337.50 668,975.00 (25,3G2.50) 0.80G7583x (20,461.41) 06/30/2020 5G,GZO.00 80,678.13 24,058.13 0.7937892x 19,097.08 12/30/2020 706,620.00 685,678.13 (20,941.87) 0.7810286x (16,356.20) 06/30/2021 47,G82.50 66,687.50 19,005.00 0.7G84732x 14,604.83 12/30/2021 732,682.50 716,687.50 (15,995.00) 0.7561196x (12,094.13) 06/30/2022 37,407.50 51,656.25 14,248.75 0.7439646x 10,600.57 12/30/2022 752,407.50 741,656.25 (10,751.25) 0.7320050x (77869.97) 06/30/2023 25,967.50 35,268.75 9,301.25 0.7202376x 6,699.11 12/30/2023 765,967.50 760,268.75 (5,698.75) 0.7086594x (4,038.47) 06/30/2024 13,387.50 18,050.00 4,GG2.50 0,6972674x 3,251.01 12/30/2024 778,387.50 778,050.00 (337.50) 0.6860584x (231.54) Total $8,175,751.88 $8,5492981.26 $374,229.38 - $355,640.47 RfdgSeries053.IA13iiV/RAGLEPURFOS'6/ 911912013/2.33PAf Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 8 Preliminary $6,760,000 United City of YoAville,Kendall Colulty,Illinois General Obligation LihimyRefundingBonds,Series 2013 S&P'BBB*"Underlying Rating&BQ Bond Issue Summary Of Bonds Refunded Maturity Issue Maturity Type of Bond Coupon Value Call Date Call Price Dated 12/30/2012 Delivered 12/30/2012 Series 2005 12/30/2014 Serial Coupon 4.000% 400,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005 12/30/2015 Serial Coupon 4.000% 435,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005 12/30/2016 Serial Coupon 4000% 460,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005 12/30/2017 Serial Coupon 4.000% 485,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005 12/30/2018 Serial Coupon 4.625% 540,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005 12/30/2019 Serial Coupon 4.G25% 575,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005 12/30/2020 Serial Coupon 4.625% 605,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005 12/30/2021 Serial Coupon 4G25% 650,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005 12/30/2022 Serial Coupon 4.750% 690,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005 12/30/2023 Serial Coupon 4.750% 725,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Series 2005 12/30/2024 Serial Coupon 4.750% 760,000 12/30/2013 100.000% Subtotal - - $6,325,000 - - Total - $6,325,000 - - R£dg SedesOB 319.13 w//SINCLEPUR'OSP, /311912013/233 In t Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 9 Preliminary $6,760,000 United City of YoAville,Kendall County,Illinois General Obligation LiblalyRefunidingBonds, Series 2013 S&P'FM+"Underlying RatM,-&BQ Bond Issue Refunding Summary Dated 05/15/2013 1 Delivered 05/15/2013 Sources Of Funds ParAmount of Bonds................................................................................................................................................................................ $6,7G0,000.00 ReofferingPremium.................................................................................................................................................................................. 16,674.75 TotalSources........................................................................................................................................................................................... $6,776,674.75 Uses Of Funds TotalUnderwriter's Discount (1.250%)................................................................................................................................................. 84,500.00 Costsof Issuance....................................................................................................................................................................................... 85,000.00 Depositto Net Cash Escrow Find............................................................................................................................................................ 6,604,654.18 RoundingAmount..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2,520.57 TotalUses.............................................................................................................................................................................................. $6,776,674.75 Flow of Funds Detail State and Local Government Series(SLGS)rates for.............................................................................................................................. 3/19/2013 Dateof OMP Candidates.......................................................................................................................................................................... NetCash Escrow Fund Solution Method................................................................................................................................................. Net Funded TotalCost of Investments.......................................................................................................................................................................... $6,604,654.18 InterestEarnings @ 0.110%.................................................................................................................................................................... 4,470.82 TotalDraws............................................................................................................................................................................................. $6,609,125.00 Issues Refunded And Call Dates Series2005............................................................................................................................................................................................. 12/30/2013 FV Analysis Summary(Net to Net) NetPV Cashflow Savings @ 3.2G8%(AIC)............................................................................................................................................ 355,640.47 Contingencyor Rounding Amount.......................................................................................................................................................... 2,520.57 NetPresent Value Benefit......................................................................................................................................................................... $358,161.04 Net PV Benefit/ $6,325,000 Refunded Principal...................................... ° NetPV Benefit/ $6,760,000 Refunding Principal............................................................................................................................... 5.298% Bond Statistics AverageLife............................................................................................................................................................................................ 7.158 Years AverageCoupon................................................................—.................................................................................................................... 2.9257117% NetInterest Cost(NIC).............................................................................................................................................................................. 3.0658754% BondYield for Arbitrage Purposes.......................................................................................................................................................... 2.8673000% TideInterest Cost(TIC)............................................................................................................................................................................ 3.0651904% AllInclusive Cost(AIC)............................................................................................................................................................................ 3.2676320% RfdSSWics053.1.9./3 n//SIACLPPURPOSE/311912013/Z•38 PA-f Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 10 Preliminary MSRB RULE G-23 DISCLOSURE&G-I7DISCLOSURE In recent years, Congress has enacted legislation seeping to r efonn financi a a rizets in the wake of the 2008-2009 financial crisis. One of the mostprominentpieces of-legislation is the Dodd-Trunk Wall Street Refoim and Consumer Protection Act. The implementation ofDodd-Trankhas led to a series of iv ulatoiy changesgoveniing inimicipal securities The 2011 amendments to Rule G-23, and the 2012 amendments to Rude G-17, of the Mimicipal Securities Raulemaking Board (MSRB) require Bemai0 Seclifi es, Inc. to define its role at the earliest stages of our relationship with your for this issue, Beilrardi Securities, Inc. will only serve as an a nderwiiter. As an underwriter, we will be acting as a principal in a commercial, arrns'length transaction, and not as a rnun cipal advisor,financial advisor, or fiduciary.As an widerwlitei; ou-pumbase ofseczrities will be with a view to distribute these securities to investors It is important for you to uusdel stand that in this r ole Bemardi Securities,Inc.has financial and other inter gists that may differ fr onu yours MSRB Rule G-17 requires uus to deal fairly at all tinges with both mumicipal issuers and Investors. 0111, dirty to par chase securities hvin an issuer at fair arrdreasorrable prices niazst be balanced with the duty to sell securities to in vestol s at fair and reasonable prices. Bernardi Securities,Inc. will review the issuer's official statement for the issuer's securities in accordance with, and as pall of, our responsibilities to in vestors under federal securities la ws, as applied to the facts and cir^cuunstances of this transaction. The designation ofBeivaldi Securities,Inc. as underwriter applies solely to this issute. We encouuage you to consult with you-own legal, accounting, tax,financial and other advisors, as applicable, to the extent you deem appropriate. Bernardi Securities, Inc. Page 10 BERNARDI EC"ITIES M L N I C I P A L BOND SPECIALISTS United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois General Obligation Library Refunding Bonds, Series 2013 March 19, 2013 RISK DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO MSRB RULE G-17 FIXED RATE BONDS (THAT ARE NOT"COMPLEX MUNICIPAL SECURITIES FINANCINGS") The following is a general description of the financial characteristics and security structures of fixed rate municipal bonds ("Fixed Rate Bonds"), as well as a general description of certain financial risks that are known to us and reasonably foreseeable at this time and that you should consider before deciding whether to issue Fixed Rate Bonds. If you have any questions or concerns about these disclosures, please make those questions or concerns known immediately to us. In addition, you should consult with your financial and/or municipal, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors, as applicable, to the extent you deem appropriate. FINANCIAL CHARACTERISTICS Maturity and Interest. Fixed Rate Bonds are interest-bearing debt securities issued by state and local governments, political subdivisions and agencies and authorities. Maturity dates for Fixed Rate Bonds are fixed at the time of issuance and may include serial maturities (specified principal amounts are payable on the same date in each year until final maturity) or one or more term maturities (specified principal amounts are payable on each term maturity date) or a combination of serial and term maturities. The final maturity date typically will range between 10 and 30 years from the date of issuance. Interest on the Fixed Rate Bonds typically is paid semiannually at a stated fixed rate or rates for each maturity date. Redemption. Fixed Rate Bonds may be subject to optional redemption, which allows you, at your option, to redeem some or all of the bonds on a date prior to scheduled maturity, such as in connection with the issuance of refunding bonds to take advantage of lower interest rates. Fixed Rate Bonds will be subject to optional redemption only after the passage of a specified period of time, often approximately ten years from the date of issuance, and upon payment of the redemption price set forth in the bonds, which may include a redemption premium. You will be required to send out a notice of optional redemption to the holders of the bonds, usually not less than 30 days prior to the redemption date. Fixed Rate Bonds with term maturity dates also may be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption, which requires you to 20 South Clark Street, Suite 2700 - Chicago, Illinois 60603 - p. 312-726-7324 - www.BernardiSecurities.com redeem specified principal amounts of the bonds annually in advance of the term maturity date. The mandatory sinking fund redemption price is 100% of the principal amount of the bonds to be redeemed. SECURITY Payment of principal of and interest on a municipal security, including Fixed Rate Bonds, may be backed by various types of pledges and forms of security, some of which are described below. The description below regarding "Security" is only a brief summary of certain possible security provisions for the bonds and is not intended as legal advice. You should consult with your bond counsel for further information regarding the security for the bonds. General Obligation Bonds. "General obligation bonds" are debt securities to which your full faith and credit is pledged to pay principal and interest. If you have taxing power, generally you will pledge to use your ad valorem (property)taxing power to pay principal and interest. All taxable property in the taxing body is subject to the levy of taxes to pay the same without limitation as to rate or amount. The term "limited" tax is used when a limit exists as to the amount of the tax(see below). General obligation bonds constitute a debt and, depending on applicable state law, may require that you obtain approval by voters prior to issuance. In the event of default in required payments of interest or principal, the holders of general obligation bonds have certain rights under state law to compel you to impose a tax levy. Limited Bonds. Taxing bodies, subject to the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law of the State of Illinois, as amended (the "Extension Limitation Law"), can issue limited bonds. Limited bonds are issued in lieu of general obligation bonds that otherwise have been authorized by applicable law. They are payable from a separate property tax levy that is unlimited as to rate, but the amount of taxes that will be extended to pay the bonds is limited by the Extension Limitation Law. Limited bonds are payable from your debt service extension base (the "Base"), which is an amount equal to that portion of the extension for the applicable levy year for the payment of non-referendum bonds (other than alternate bonds or refunding bonds issued to refund bonds initially issued pursuant to referendum), increased each year, beginning with the 2009 levy year, by the lesser of 5% or the percentage in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (as defined in the Extension Limitation Law) during the 12-month calendar year preceding the levy year. The Limitation Law further provides that the annual amount of taxes to be extended to pay the limited bonds and all other limited bonds heretofore and hereafter issued by you shall not exceed the Base less the amount extended to pay certain other non-referendum bonds heretofore and hereafter issued by you and bonds issued to refund such bonds. Limited bonds constitute a debt. In the event of default in required payments of interest or principal, the holders of limited bonds have certain rights under state law to compel you to impose a tax levy(limited as set forth in the previous paragraph). Alternate Bonds. Section 15 of the Local Government Debt Reform Act of the State of Illinois, as amended (the "Debt Reform Act"), permits you to issue alternate or -2- "double-barrelled" bonds. Alternate bonds are general obligation bonds payable from enterprise revenues or from a revenue source, or both, with your general obligation acting as backup security for the bonds. Once issued, and until paid or defeased, alternate bonds are a general obligation, for the payment of which you pledge your full faith and credit. Such bonds are payable from the levy of ad valorem property taxes upon all taxable property in your taxing body without limitation as to rate or amount. The intent of the Debt Reform Act is for the enterprise revenues or the revenue source to be sufficient to pay the debt service on the alternate bonds so that taxes need not be levied, or, if levied,need not be extended, for such payment. The Debt Reform Act prescribes several conditions that must be met before alternate bonds may be issued. First, alternate bonds must be issued for a lawful corporate purpose. If issued in lieu of revenue bonds (as described below), then the revenue bonds must have been authorized under applicable law (including satisfying any backdoor referendum requirements) and the alternate bonds must be issued for the purpose for which the revenue bonds were authorized. If issued payable from a revenue source limited in its purposes or applications, then the alternate bonds must be issued only for such limited purposes or applications. Second, alternate bonds are subject to a backdoor referendum. The issuance of alternate bonds must be submitted to referendum if, within 30 days after publication of the authorizing ordinance and notice of intent to issue the alternate bonds, a petition is filed. The petition must be signed by the greater of (i) 7.5% of your registered voters or (ii) the lesser of 200 of the registered voters or 15% of the registered voters, asking that the issuance of the alternate bonds be submitted to referendum. Backdoor referendum proceedings for revenue bonds and for alternate bonds to be issued in lieu of revenue bonds may be conducted at the same time. Third, you must demonstrate that the enterprise revenues are, or that the revenue source is, sufficient to meet the requirements of the Debt Reform Act. If enterprise revenues are pledged as security for the alternate bonds, you must demonstrate that such revenues are sufficient in each year to pay all of the following: (a) costs of operation and maintenance of the utility or enterprise, excluding depreciation; (b) debt service on all outstanding revenue bonds payable from such enterprise revenues; (c) all amounts required to meet any fund or account requirements with respect to such outstanding revenue bonds; (d) other contractual or tort liability obligations, if any, payable from such enterprise revenues; and (e) in each year, an amount not less than 1.25 times debt service on all: (i) outstanding alternate bonds payable from such enterprise revenues; and -3- (ii) the alternate bonds proposed to be issued. If one or more revenue sources are pledged as security for the alternate bonds, you must demonstrate that such revenue sources are sufficient in each year to provide not less than 1.25 times (1.10 times if the revenue source is a government revenue source) debt service on all outstanding alternate bonds payable from such revenue source and on the alternate bonds proposed to be issued. You need not meet the test described in this paragraph for the amount of debt service set aside at closing from bond proceeds or other moneys. Alternate bonds are not regarded or included in any computation of indebtedness for the purpose of any statutory provision or limitation unless taxes, other than a designated revenue source, are extended to pay the bonds. In the event taxes are extended, the amount of alternate bonds then outstanding counts against your debt limit until your audit shows that the alternate bonds have been paid from the pledged enterprise revenues or revenue source for a complete fiscal year. In the event of default in required payments of interest or principal, the holders of alternate bonds have certain rights under state law to compel you to increase the pledged revenues or have the tax levy extended for such payment. Debt Certificates. You may issue "debt certificates" to evidence your payment obligation under an installment contract or lease. Your governing body may provide for the treasurer, comptroller, finance officer or other officer of the governing body charged with financial administration to act as counterparty to the installment contract or lease, as nominee- seller or lessor. The installment contract or lease is then executed by your authorized officer and is filed with and executed by the nominee-seller or lessor. As contracts for the acquisition and construction of the project to be financed are executed (the "Work Contracts"), the governing body orders those Work Contracts to be filed with the nominee-seller or lessor. The nominee- seller or lessor identifies the Work Contracts to the particular installment contract or lease. Such identification permits the payment of the Work Contracts from the proceeds of the debt certificates. Debt certificates are paid from your lawfully available funds. You are expected to agree to annually budget/appropriate amounts to pay the principal of and interest on the debt certificates. There is no separate levy available for the purpose of making such payments. Debt certificates constitute a debt. In the event of default in required payments of interest or principal, the holders of the debt certificates cannot compel you to impose a tax levy, but you have promised the holders of the debt certificates that you will pay the debt certificates and they can proceed to file suit to enforce such promise. Special Service Area Bonds. When special services are provided to a particular contiguous area within a municipality, in addition to the services generally provided throughout the municipality, a municipality may create a special service area. The cost of the special services may be paid from taxes levied upon the taxable real property within the area, and such -4- taxes may be levied in the special service area at a rate or amount sufficient to produce revenues required to provide the special services. Prior to the first levy of taxes in the special service area and prior to or within 60 days after the adoption of the ordinance proposing the establishment of the special service area, you are required to hold a public hearing and to publish and mail notice of such hearing. At the public hearing, any interested person may file written objections or give oral statements with respect to the establishment of the special service area and the levy of taxes therein. As a result of the hearing, you may delete areas from the special service area as long as the remaining area is contiguous. After the hearing, an ordinance establishing the special service area must be timely filed with the county recorder and the county clerk. Bonds secured by the full faith and credit of the special service area territory may be issued for the purpose of providing special services. Such bonds are paid from the levy of taxes unlimited as to rate or amount against the taxable real property in the special service area. The county clerk will annually extend taxes against all of the taxable real property in the area in amounts sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the bonds. Such bonds are exempt from the Extension Limitation Law of the State of Illinois, as amended. Prior to the issuance of special service area bonds, you must give published and mailed notice and hold a hearing at which any interested person may file written objections, or be heard orally, with respect to the issuance of the bonds. The questions of the creation of the special service area, the levy of a tax on such area and the issuance of special service area bonds may all be considered at the same hearing. The creation of the special service area, the levy of a tax within the area and the issuance of bonds for the provision of special services to the area are subject to a petition process. If, within 60 days after the public hearing, a petition signed by not less than 51% of the electors residing within the special service area and 51% of the owners of record of land located within the special service area is filed with the municipal clerk objecting to the creation of the special service area, the levy of a tax or the issuance of bonds, then the area may not be created, the tax may not be levied and the bonds may not be issued. If such a petition is filed, the subject matter of the petition may not be proposed relative to any of the signatories within the next two years. Special service area bonds do not constitute an indebtedness of the municipality, and no exercise of your taxing power may be compelled on behalf of the special service area bondholders other than the ad valorem property taxes to be extended on the taxable real property in the special service area. Revenue Bonds. "Revenue bonds" are debt securities that are payable only from a specific source or sources of revenues. Revenue bonds are not a pledge of your full faith and credit and you are obligated to pay principal and interest on your revenue bonds only from the revenue source(s) specifically pledged to the bonds. Revenue bonds do not permit the bondholders to compel you to impose a tax levy for payment of debt service. Pledged revenues may be derived from operation of the financed project or system, grants or excise or other specified taxes. Generally, subject to state law or local charter requirements, you are not -5- required to obtain voter approval prior to issuance of revenue bonds. Revenue bonds may, however, be subject to a backdoor referendum. If the specified source(s) of revenue become inadequate, a default in payment of principal or interest may occur. Various types of pledges of revenue may be used to secure interest and principal payments on revenue bonds. The nature of these pledges may differ widely based on state law, the type of issuer, the type of revenue stream and other factors. Some revenue bonds, referred to as conduit revenue bonds, may be issued by a governmental issuer acting as conduit for the benefit of a private sector entity or a 501(c)(3) organization (the obligor). Conduit revenue bonds commonly are issued for not-for-profit hospitals, educational institutions, single and multi-family housing, airports, industrial or economic development projects, and student loan programs, among other obligors. Principal and interest on conduit revenue bonds normally are paid exclusively from revenues pledged by the obligor. Unless otherwise specified under the terms of the bonds, you are not required to make payments of principal or interest if the obligor defaults. Tax Increment Financing. Tax increment financing provides a means for municipalities, after the approval of a "redevelopment plan and project," to redevelop blighted, conservation or industrial park conservation areas. The Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act of the State of Illinois, as amended, allows incremental property taxes to be used to pay certain redevelopment project costs and to pay debt service with respect to tax increment bonds issued to pay redevelopment project costs. The municipality is authorized to issue tax increment bonds payable from, and secured by, incremental property tax revenues expected to be generated in the redevelopment project area. Incremental property tax revenues are derived from the increase in the current equalized assessed valuation of the real property within the redevelopment project area over and above the certified initial equalized assessed valuation for such redevelopment project area. Before adopting the necessary ordinances to designate a redevelopment project area, a municipality must hold a public hearing and convene a joint review board to consider the proposal. At the public hearing, any interested person or taxing district may file written objections and may give oral statements with respect to the proposed financing. After the municipality has considered all comments made by the public and the joint review board, it may adopt the necessary ordinances to designate a redevelopment project area. Tax increment bonds may be secured by the full faith and credit of the municipality. The issuance of general obligation tax increment bonds is subject to a "backdoor," rather than a direct, referendum. Once a municipality has authorized the issuance of tax increment obligations secured by its full faith and credit, the ordinance authorizing the issuance must be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality. In response, voters may petition to request that the question of issuing obligations using the full faith and credit of the municipality as security to pay for redevelopment project costs be submitted to the electors of the municipality. If, within 30 days after the publication, 10% of the registered voters of the municipality sign such a petition, the question of whether to issue tax increment bonds secured by the municipality's full faith and credit must be approved by the voters pursuant to referendum. Such bonds are not exempt from the Extension Limitation Law unless first approved at referendum. -6- Tax increment revenues may also be treated as a "revenue source" and be pledged to the payment of alternate bonds under Section 15 of the Debt Reform Act. FINANCIAL RISK CONSIDERATIONS Certain risks may arise in connection with your issuance of Fixed Rate Bonds, including some or all of the following (generally, the obligor, rather than you, will bear these risks for conduit revenue bonds): Issuer Default Risk. You may be in default if the funds pledged to secure your bonds are not sufficient to pay debt service on the bonds when due. The consequences of a default may be serious for you and, depending on applicable state law and the terms of the authorizing documents, the holders of the bonds, the trustee and any credit support provider may be able to exercise a range of available remedies against you. For example, if the bonds are secured by a general obligation pledge, you may be ordered by a court to raise taxes. Other budgetary adjustments also may be necessary to enable you to provide sufficient funds to pay debt service on the bonds. If the bonds are revenue bonds or alternate bonds, you may be required to take steps to increase the available revenues that are pledged as security for the bonds. A default may negatively impact your credit ratings and may effectively limit your ability to publicly offer bonds or other securities at market interest rate levels. Further, if you are unable to provide sufficient funds to remedy the default, subject to applicable state law and the terms of the authorizing documents, you may find it necessary to consider available alternatives under state law, including (for some issuers) state-mandated receivership or bankruptcy. A default also may occur if you are unable to comply with covenants or other provisions agreed to in connection with the issuance of the bonds. This description is only a brief summary of issues relating to defaults and is not intended as legal advice. You should consult with your bond counsel for further information regarding defaults and remedies. Redemption Risk. Your ability to redeem the bonds prior to maturity may be limited, depending on the terms of any optional redemption provisions. In the event that interest rates decline, you may be unable to take advantage of the lower interest rates to reduce debt service. Refinancing Risk. If your financing plan contemplates refinancing some or all of the bonds at maturity (for example, if you have term maturities or if you choose a shorter final maturity than might otherwise be permitted under the applicable federal tax rules), market conditions or changes in law may limit or prevent you from refinancing those bonds when required. Further, limitations in the federal tax rules on advance refunding of bonds (an advance refunding of bonds occurs when tax-exempt bonds are refunded more than 90 days prior to the date on which those bonds may be retired) may restrict your ability to refund the bonds to take advantage of lower interest rates. -7- Reinvestment Risk. You may have proceeds of the bonds to invest prior to the time that you are able to spend those proceeds for the authorized purpose. Depending on market conditions, you may not be able to invest those proceeds at or near the rate of interest that you are paying on the bonds, which is referred to as "negative arbitrage." Tax Compliance Risk. The issuance of tax-exempt bonds is subject to a number of requirements under the United States Internal Revenue Code, as enforced by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). You must take certain steps and make certain representations prior to the issuance of tax-exempt bonds. You also must covenant to take certain additional actions after issuance of the tax-exempt bonds. A breach of your representations or your failure to comply with certain tax-related covenants may cause the interest on the bonds to become taxable retroactively to the date of issuance of the bonds, which may result in an increase in the interest rate that you pay on the bonds or the mandatory redemption of the bonds. The IRS also may audit you or your bonds, in some cases on a random basis and in other cases targeted to specific types of bond issues or tax concerns. If the bonds are declared taxable, or if you are subject to audit, the market price of your bonds may be adversely affected. Further, your ability to issue other tax-exempt bonds also may be limited. This description of tax compliance risks is not intended as legal advice and you should consult with your bond counsel regarding tax implications of issuing the bonds. -8- A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 440 Legal ❑ ADM#2 Finance ■ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ■ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ ADM 2013-16 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Benefit Insurance Program Renewal Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: See attached memo. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approval Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: This item is scheduled to be discussed at the March 21St Administration Committee meeting, which was held after this agenda was published. Thus, no written committee recommendation is available. We placed this agenda item on the Admin report so that the City Council would have two meetings to discuss the health insurance. This renewal must be authorized at this meeting or the April 9th City Council meeting. Q Memorandum �` To: City Council Esr. 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator .t ! CC: Date: March 14, 2013 NcrAil Cc.city �� ALE ►�- Subject: Health insurance renewal Summary Review and recommendation of the City's health insurance plans for FY 14. Background Human Resources Manager Meghan Ostreko has put together recommendations on each insurance package. In general, dental,vision and life insurance packages saw no or minimal increase. We recommended health insurance packages with a potential 15%total increase, but for reasons articulated in Mrs. Ostreko's memo and this one,we feel that is acceptable. We had budgeted for 10% increases in every insurance group. Because health insurance is up to a 15% increase over last year's costs, the City is looking at being $60,000 over budget in FY 14. This 15% increase assumes that every dollar of HRA spending on PPO plans is used in FY 14. In normal years, we would expect only 80% of those HRA funds to be spent by individuals with PPO plans. Last year was a normal usage rate of about 80%. If FY 14 is a normal year, we would expect to gain back around$50,000 in HRA funds at the end of the FY. Additionally, we assumed 10% increases in dental, vision and life insurance and all quotes came back at 0% or minimal increases, which saves the City another $3,000. With the $53,000 in probable savings, our potential budget overage amount is only $7,000. Finally, our health insurance provider is allowing us to offer more than two types of plans this year. Our recommendation is to add a second PPO plan, for a total of three plans (one HMO, two PPOs). This third plan would be for a PPO package that offered less benefits than our current PPO, but the City would also pick up a larger percentage of the total cost for the employee. For employees that do not expect to use health insurance benefits in FY 14, this gives them an opportunity to pay less out of their pocket than either the HMO or PPO plans currently offered by the City. Additionally, because the plans offer less benefits, they are cheaper to the City. Compared to the current PPO plan, the new PPO plan would cost the employee anywhere from $36 per month to $90 per month less, and the City would save anywhere from $530 to $2,000 per year per individual. If only a couple individuals opt out of the HMO or PPO plan into the new PPO plan, the City could wipe out the potential $7,000 budget overage. Recommendation For the reasons articulated above and in Mrs. Ostreko's memo, I recommend the City continue with its current HMO and PPO plan and add a third offering of HSA PPO NPSElA07. •� ° �,,.� Memorandum It EST. _ I 9836 To: Administration Committee From: Meghan Ostreko, HR Manager Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: March 13, 2012 Subject: FY14 Employee Benefits Renewal On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 City Administrator Olson, Finance Director Fredrickson, Administrative Intern Weckbach, and I met with Joe Liberty of Better Business Planning to discuss our upcoming benefits renewal for employee health, dental, vision, and life insurance. Below is a summary of each benefit and our recommendations for each. Joe will be in attendance at Thursday's meeting to discuss our renewal and answer any questions. Life Insurance Current Carrier: Lincoln Financial FY 12/13 Premium: $9,176 (0.155 / $1000 of Life/AD&D) (2.67 for dependent life) FY 13/14 Premium: $9,176 (0.1551 $1000 of Life/AD&D) (2.67 for dependent life) 0% change Recommendation: We are recommending switching employee life insurance to Guardian. Guardian has submitted a quote for 0.140/$1000 of Life/AD&D and 2.23 for dependent life, which is 11.1% lower than our current Lincoln Financial Group premium, and they have guaranteed that rate for 24 months. They have also agreed to supply an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) for no additional cost, and will honor the current Lincoln Financial Group rates for optional life and employee buy-ups. Vision Insurance Current Carrier: EyeMed FY 12/13 Premium: $9,754 FY 13/14 Premium: $9,754 0% change Recommendation: We are recommending no change to our vision insurance. No other carriers came close to matching the low rates offered by EyeMed and there have been no complaints from employees regarding their coverage. Additionally, our rate with EyeMed is guaranteed for 24 more months Dental Insurance Current Carrier: Blue Cross Blue Shield(BCBS) FY 12/13 Premium: $90,825 FY 13/14 Premium: $92,141 1.4% increase Recommendation: We are recommending no change to our dental insurance. While a few other carriers quoted lower premium rates, they also offer a reduced benefit and/or have a reputation for quoting low rates the first year only to increase them significantly in subsequent years. Health Insurance-Attachment D Current Carrier: Blue Cross Blue Shield(BCBS) HMO-FY 12/13 Premium: $347,245 HMO-FY 13/14 Premium: $434,409 25.1% increase PPO-FY 12/13 Premium: $636,041 (plus-$279,000 in HRA liability) PPO-FY 13/14 Premium: $735,312 (plus-$279,000 in HRA liability) 15.6% increase Recommendation: While unexpected and undesirable the large premium increases are driven by the past year's claims. Staff is recommending no changes to the current HMO and PPO plans, but is recommending adding a second PPO option. This second option would be targeted to employees who rarely use their insurance benefit but want to maintain the freedom of a PPO at a lower cost. The premium for this second PPO option is lower because BCBS would only pay 80% after the deductible, instead of the 100% after the deductible that is our current plan. We are proposing no change to the employee contributions which, as of last year, are a fixed percentage of the premium. Employee Contributions: BCBS Current FY 12/13 Employee Only Employee+ Employee+ Family Spouse Children HMO Premium $461.90 $972.02 $945.72 $1,455.84 Non-Union Employee 8.5%_$39.26 8.5%=$82.62 8.5%=$80.39 7.5%=$109.19 inUnion Employee 8.5%_$39.26 8.5%_$82.62 8.5%=$80.39 7.5%=$10 9.19 PPO Premium $422.89 $889.93 $865.88 $1,332.92 $3,500($7,000)deduct. +$250 HRA +$500 HRA +$500 HRA +$500 HRA Non-Union Employee 9.5%=$63.92 9.5%=$132.04 9.5%=$129.76 9%=$164.96 Union Employee 9.5%=$63.92 9.5%=$132.04 9.5%=$129.76 9%=$164.96 (HRA= $3,000($6,000)/12) BCBS Renewal FY 13/14) Employee Only Employee+ Employee+ Family Spouse Children HMO Premium $584.95 $1,231.33 $1,165.35 $1,811.75 Non-Union Employee 8.5%=$49.72 8.5%=$104.66 8.5%=$99.05 7.5%=$135.88 Union Employee 8.5%=$49.72 8.5%=$104.66 8.5%=$99.05 7.5%=$135.88 PPOI Premium $495.57 $1,043.21 $987.31 $1,534.94 $3,500($7,000)deduct. +$250 HRA +$500 HRA +$500 HRA +$500 HRA Non-Union Employee 9.5%_$70.83 9.5%_$146.60 9.5%_$141.29 9%=$183.14 Union Employee 9.5%_$70.83 9.5%_$146.60 9.5%_$141.29 9%_$183.14 PPO2 Premium $414.84 $873.26 $826.46 $1,284.88 $3,500($7,000)deduct. +$250 HRA +$500 HRA +$500 HRA +$500 HRA Non-Union Employee 4%_$29.60 4%_$54.93 4%_$53.05 4%_$71.39 Union Employee TBD TBD TBD TBD (HRA= $3,000($6,000)112) HMO HDHP TOTAL EMPLOYEE: 7 11 18 BETTER BUSINESS EMPLOYEE&SPOUSE: 6 10 16 P L A N N I N G INC. EMPLOYEE&CHILD(REN): 1 4 5 MEDICAL PLAN ANALYSIS FAMILY: 13 27 40 TOTAL: 27 1 52 79 DEDUCTIBLE COINSURANCE COINSURANCE LIMIT MEMBER'S RESPONSIBILITY(IN-NETWORK) RATES PREMIUM 1 VARIANCE """ Physician Visit Employee Gross Gross Change R1°°a°Fget°°sme�d IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT Inpatient Emergency (PCP1 Employee & Monthly Annual From Individual(Family) Individual(Family) Individual(Family) Individual(Family) Hospital Visit Room Visit Sped Prescriptions Em Io ee & Souse Children Famil Total Total Current 05101/12-04130113- Current HMO NHHB106 $0 No Benefit 100% No Benefit $1,500(2x) No Benefit $0 $150 $20/$40 $10/$40/$60 $461.90 $972.02 $945.72 $1,455.84 $28,937 $347,245 HSA PPO NPSEIA07 $3,500($7,000) 100% 80% $0 $2,300($4,600) Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, $422.89 $889.93 $865.88 $1,332.92 $53,003 $636,041 then pay 0% then Pav 0% then Pav 0% then Pav 0% 11 1 TOTAL: $81,941 $983,286 ANNUAL REIMBURSEMENT LIABILITY: 1 $3,000 1 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 ,000 MAXIMUM POTENTIAL COSTS(Insurance Premium+Reimbursement Liability): $ 05101113-04130114- Renewal HMO NHHB106 $0 No Benefit 100% No Benefit $1,500(2x) No Benefit $150 $20/$40 $10/$40/$60 $624.91 $1,315.46 $1,244.97 $1,935.53 $38,674 $464,088 d27 HSA PPO NPSEIA07 $3,500($7,000) 100% 80% $0 $2,300($4,600) 1:E Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, $529.44 $1,114.48 $1,054.76 $1,639.82 $65,463 $785,554 then a 0% then a 0% then a 0% TOTAL: $104,137 $1,249,642 ANNUAL REIMBURSEMENT LIABILITY: $3,000 1 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 $279,000 MAXIMUM POTENTIAL COSTS(Insurance Premium+Reimbursement Liability): $1,528,642 21.1% 05101/13-04130114- Negotiated Renewal HMONHHB106 $0 No Benefit 100% No Benefit $1,500(2x) No Benefit $0 $150 $20/$40 $10/$40/$60 $584.95 $1,23133 $1,165.35 $1,811.75 $36,201 $434,409 25.1% HSA PPO NPSEIA07 $3,500($7,000) 100% 80% $0 $2,300($4,600) Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, $495.57 $1,043.21 $987.31 $1,534.94 $61,276 $735,312 15.6% then paV 0% then Pav 0% then Pav 0% then Pav 0% TOTAL: $97,477 $1,169,721 19.0% ANNUAL REIMBURSEMENT LIABILITY: 1 $3,000 1 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 $279,000 MAXIMUM POTENTIAL COSTS(Insurance Premium+Reimbursement Liability): $1,448,721 14.8% *The Administrative fee for the Reimbursement plan is$3/Employee/Month AMOUNT REIMBURSED IN PRIOR YEAR(0110112012-1213112012): $196,673 AMOUNT REIMBURSED TO DATE IN CURRENT YEAR(0110112013-0212512013): $31,836 IMPORTANT NOTES: Please read the Benefit,Prescription&Network/Availability notes on the"Carrier Notes"page at the end of this Medical Plan Analysis. PLAN DEDUCTIBLE&COINSURANCE LIMIT DIFFERENCES: If listed with a"3x"or"2x": The family limit is determined on an"Embedded"basis. (Coinsurance and/or Copayments will begin for a family member once he/she has satisfied the individual deductible) If listed with a dollar amount: The family limit is determined on an"Aggregate"basis. (Coinsurance or Copayments will not begin for any family member until the entire family deductible is satisfied) PLEASE NOTE: This benefit summary/comparison contains a general description of certain benefits&quoted costs and does not set forth the procedures,limitations and exclusions or final rates applicable to each policy. This benefit summarylcomparison is intended to foster discussion regarding policy highlights and is created for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for the official carrier quote,proposal,plan certificate and/or booklet. 56 DEDUCTIBLE COINSURANCE COINSURANCE LIMIT MEMBER'S RESPONSIBILITY(IN-NETWORK) RATES PREMIUM 1 VARIANCE Blue Blue Shield IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT Physician Visit Employee Gross Gross Change d i..k - - - Inpatient Emergency (PCP/ Employee & Monthly Annual From Individual(Family) Individual(Family) Individual(Family) Individual(Family) Hospital Visit Room Visit Specialist) Prescriptions Em to ee & Souse Children Family Total Total Current BCBS OF IL-BlueEdge HSA PPO Options HSA PPO NPSM1A05 $1,250 $2,500 100% 80% 1,250 $2,500 Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, o ( ) $ ( ) then pay 0% then pay 10% then pay 0% then pay 20% $665.64 $1,401.23 $1,326.14 $2,061.72 $82,305 $987,664 55.3/o Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, o HSAPPONPSS1so5 $1,500($3,000) 100% 80% $1,500($3,000) then pay 0% then pay 10% then pay 0% then pay 20% $625.91 $1,317.57 $1,246.97 $1,938.63 $77,392 $928,699 46.0% HSA PPO NPSM3A05 $1,250($2,500) $2,400($4,800) 80% 60% $1,250($2,500) $2,400($4,800) Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, $603.12 $1,269.61 $1,201.57 $1,868.05 $74,574 $894,889 40.7% then pay 20% then pay 10% then pay 20% then pay 20% HSA PPO NPEC1807 $2,500 2X $5,000 2x 100% 80% Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, ( ) ( ) $0 $5,000(2x) then pay 0% then pay 0% then pay 0% then pay 0% $592.87 $1,248.04 $1,181.16 $1,836.32 $73,307 $879,686 38.3% HSA PPO NPSC1807 $2,500 $5,000 100% 80% Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, o ( ) $0 $2,500($5,000) then pay 0% then pay 0% then pay 0% then pay 0% $559.24 $1,177.24 $1,114.15 $1,732.14 $69,148 $829,780 30.5/0 HSA PPO NPS93505 $1,500($3,000) $3,000($6,000) 80% 60% $1,500($3,000) $3,000($6,000) Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, $559.13 $1,177.01 $1,113.93 $1,731.80 $69,135 $829,619 30.4% then pay 20% then pay 10% then pay 20% then pay 20% HSA PPO NPEC3805 $2,500 2X $5,000 2X 80% 60% Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, ( ) ( ) $2,500(2x) $5,000(2x) then pay 20% then pay 10% then pay 20% then pay 20% $497.37 $1,046.99 $990.89 $1,540.50 $61,498 $737,976 16.0% HSA PPO NPSE1A07 $3,500 $7,000 100% 80% Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, ( ) $0 $2,300($4,600) then pay 0% then pay 0% then pay 0% then pay o% $495.57 $1,043.21 $987.31 $1,534.94 $61,276 $735,312 15.6% HSA PPO NPSC3805 $2,500($5,000) $5,000($10,000) 80% 60% $2,500($5,000) $5,000($10,000) Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, $466.35 $981.70 $929.09 $1,444.44 $579663 $691,956 8.8% then pay 20% then pay 10% then pay 20% then pay 20% HSA PPO NPEE3A05 $3,500 2X $7,000 2X 80% 60% Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, ( ) ( ) $2,300(2x) $4,600(2x) then pay 20% then pay 10% then pay 20% then pay 20% $456.21 $960.36 $908.89 $1,413.03 $56,409 $676,910 6.4% HSA PPO NPSE3A05 $3,500($7,000) $7,000($14,000) 80% 60% $2,300($4,600) $4,600($9,200) Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, $414.84 $873.26 $826.46 $1,284.88 $51,293 $615,521 -3.2% 11 then pay 20% 1 then pay 10% 1 then pay 20% 1 then pay 20% Reimbursement Arrangement Example HSA PPO NPSE3A05 $3,500($7,000) $7,000($14,000) 80% 1 60% 11 $2,300($4,600) $4,600($9,200) Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, Satisfy Deductible, $414.84 $873.26 $826.46 $1,284.88 $519293 $615,521 -3.2% then pay 20% then pay 10% then pay 20% then pay 20 ANNUAL REIMBURSEMENT LIABILITY: $3,000 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000 $279,000 The reimbursement amounts shown here are only an example. The employer can determine TOTAL COSTS: $894,521 -2.2% these amounts and method of reimbursement subject to carrier guidelines. (Certain carriers only allow 50%of Deductible reimbursement or rates may be adjusted) TOTAL COSTS if 75%of Reimbursement Liability met: $824,771 -9.9% TOTAL COSTS if 50%of Reimbursement Liability met: $755,021 -17.5% TOTAL COSTS if 25%of Reimbursement Liability met: $685,271 -25.1% *The Administrative fee for the Reimbursement plan is$3/Employee/Month IMPORTANT NOTES: Any benefit highlighted above in red print represents a benefit change from the RENEWAL level of benefits. Please read the Benefit,Prescription&Network/Availability notes on the"Carrier Notes"page at the end of this Medical Plan Analysis. PLAN DEDUCTIBLE&COINSURANCE LIMIT DIFFERENCES: • If listed with a"3x"or"2x": The family limit is determined on an"Embedded"basis. (Coinsurance and/or Copayments will begin for a family member once he/she has satisfied the individual deductible) • If listed with a dollar amount: The family limit is determined on an"Aggregate"basis. (Coinsurance or Copayments will not begin for any family member until the entire family deductible is satisfied) PLEASE NOTE: This benefit summary/comparison contains a general description of certain benefits&quoted costs and does not set forth the procedures,limitations and exclusions or final rates applicable to each policy. This benefit summary/comparison is intended to foster discussion regarding policy highlights and is created for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for the official carrier quote,proposal,plan certificate and/or booklet. 57 BETTER BUSINESS PLANNING INC DENTAL ANALYSIS - &AlwaysCare .C-ompanlon I Ife (ec o V E N T R °I-6...pl.eSliieltl BI-C-BI-S] R i S U P,A N T t, T 1 e.... CURRENT RENEWAL TYPE OF PLAN: DPPO DPPO DPPO DPPO DPPO DPPO DPPO it COVERAGE STRUCTURE: (IN/OUT) (IN/OUT) (IN/OUT) (IN/OUT) (IN I OUT) (IN I OUT) (IN I OUT) INDIVIDUAL DEDUCTIBLE: $25/$25 $25/$25 $50/$50 $25/$25 $50/$50 $25/$25 $50/$50 19 FAMILY DEDUCTIBLE: $75/$75 $75/$75 $150/$150 $75/$75 $150/$150 $75/$75 $150/$150 DEDUCTIBLE WAIVED FOR PREVENTIVE?: YES/YES YES/YES YES/YES YES/YES YES/YES YES/YES YES/YES PREVENTIVE SERVICES: 100%/100% 100%/100% 100%/100% 100%/100% 100%/100% 100%/100% 100%/100% BASIC SERVICES: 80%/80% 80%/80% 80%/80% 80%/80% 80%/80% 80%/80% 80%/80% MAJOR SERVICES: 50%/50% 50%/50% 50%/50% 50%/50% 50%/50% 50%/50% 50%/50% ORTHODONTIA SERVICES: 50%/50% 50%/50% 50%/50% 50%/50% 50%/50% 50%/50% NO BENEFIT ENDODONTICS LEVEL: BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC MAJOR SURGICAL PERIODONTICS LEVEL: BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC MAJOR NON-SURGICAL PERIODONTICS LEVE BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC BASIC MAJOR IMPLANTS COVERED?: NO NO NO YES NO YES NO ORTHODONTIA FOR ADULT/CHILD?: YES/YES YES/YES NO/YES YES/YES NO/YES NO/YES NOT APPLICABLE ANNUAL DENTAL MAXIMUM: $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $1,000 LIFETIME ORTHODONTIA MAXIMUM: $2,000 $2,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 NOT APPLICABLE USUAL&CUSTOMARY LEVEL: 90% 90% 85% 90% 90% 90% MAC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENT: EMPLOYEE RATE: 17 $36.82 $37.05 $44.30 $39.96 $35.86 $44.88 $27.91 EMPLOYEE&SPOUSE RATE: 15 $76.39 $73.94 $84.70 $82.88 $73.59 $89.77 $55.82 EMPLOYEE&1 CHILD RATE: 1 $87.98 $82.45 $104.90 $95.46 $93.93 $104.11 $70.47 EMPLOYEE&2+CHILDREN RATE: 4 $87,98 $82.45 $104.90 $95.46 $93.93 $104.11 $70.47 FAMILY RATE: 42 $127.55 $131.60 $145.40 $138.40 $131.67 $151.36 $106.89 TOTAL ENROLLED: X79 MONTHLY PREMIUM: $7,569 $7,678 $8,655 $8,213 $7,713 $8,987 $6,154 ANNUAL PREMIUM: $90,825 $92,141 $103,859 $98,551 $92,559 $107,846 $73,842 VARIANCE FROM CURRENT 1.4% 14.3% 8.5% 1.9% 18.7% 18.7% RATE GUARANTEE: 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS CARRIERS DECLINING: Mutual of Omaha&Reliance Standard IMPORTANT REMINDERS: Some carriers can have a waiting period and/or frequency limit imposed for certain services. Prior authorization is suggested for services to be performed in excess of a certain dollar amount(Le.$250) PLEASE NOTE: This benefit summary/comparison contains a general description of certain benefits&quoted costs and does not set forth the procedures,limitations and exclusions or final rates applicable to each policy.This benefit summary/comparison is intended to foster discussion regarding policy highlights and is created for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for the official carrier quote,proposal,plan certificate and/or booklet. 98 BETTER BUSINESS PLANNING INC. LIFE/AD&D ANALYSIS r -�,LillCOIII 1.IriCOIII L COmparion life � HUMANA. ,,,aa,G,a„o F.,,--1,,,.P GUARDIAN CURRENT RENEWAL BENEFIT AMOUNT: * $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 MAXIMUM(if multiple of Salary): ** - - - - - - GUARANTEE ISSUE LIMIT: *** $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 DEPENDENT COVERAGE?: YES YES YES YES YES NO SPOUSE AMOUNT: $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 CHILD(REN)AMOUNT: $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 REDUCTION SCHEDULE BENEFIT AT AGE 65: $32,500 $32,500 $32,500 $32,500 $32,500 BENEFIT AT AGE 70: $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 BENEFIT AT AGE 75: No Further Reduction No Further Reduction No Further Reduction $12,500 No Further Reduction No Further Reduction BENEFIT AT AGE 80: No Further Reduction BENEFIT AT AGE 85: #OF EMPLOYEES: 78 78 78 78 78 78 TOTAL VOLUME: * $3,900,000 $3,900,000 $3,900,000 $3,900,000 $3,900,000 $3,900,000 LIFE/AD&D RATE/$1,000: 0.155 0.155 0.160 0.210 0.140 0.170 #OF DEPENDENT UNITS: 60 60 60 60 60 0 DEPENDENT LIFE UNIT RATE: $2.67 $2.67 $2.67 $2.52 MONTHLY PREMIUM: $765 $765 $784 $970 $680 $663 ANNUAL PREMIUM: $9,176 $9,176 $9,410 $11,642 $8,158 $7,956 VARIANCE FROM CURRENT: 0.0% 2.6% 26.9% -11.1% -13.3% RATE GUARANTEE: D 12 MONTHS 24 MONTHS 24 MONTHS 24 MONTHS 36 MONTHS CARRIERS DECLINING: Aetna,Assurant,Mutual of Omaha&Reliance Standard IMPORTANT REMINDERS: * The LifelAD&D Benefit amount will be less for those employees at an age where the Reduction Schedule begins,however the above volume only calculates the full benefit amount for all employees regardless of their age. ** If the LifelAD&D Benefit is based on a multiple of the employee's salary,updates should be reported to the insurance carrier as changes occur or at the plan anniversary. *** Benefit amounts that an employee may be eligible for beyond the"Guarantee Issue limit"will require underwriting approval following the completion of a Health Statement by the employee. **** Life/AD&D Benefit amounts in excess of$50,000 are taxable to the employee's estate unless the premium paid for Benefit amounts in excess of$50,000 are calculated as imputed income to the employee. Please consult your tax advisor. PLEASE NOTE: This benefit summary/comparison contains a general description of certain benefits&quoted costs and does not set forth the procedures,limitations and exclusions or final rates applicable to each policy. This benefit summary/comparison is intended to foster discussion regarding policy highlights and is created for informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for the official carrier quote,proposal,plan certificate and/or booklet. 101 A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 440 Legal ❑ PKBD #1 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ❑ ~� City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ CC 2013-20 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation E Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Mower Trade-in Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: The Parks Department is requesting approval to trade-in a 2003 Toro mower as part of the purchase of a new mower. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Approve mower trade-in. Submitted by: Laura Schraw Parks & Recreation Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Please see the attached memo. Co.® Memorandum EST. _ 1836 To: Yorkville City Council From: Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks e°°�Ty .� p LLE t Date: March 15, 2013 Subject: Mower Trade-in D The Parks Department is seeking approval to trade-in a 2003 Toro mower to Reinders, Inc., as part of the purchase of a new mower. The three quotes were obtained by Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks, for the trade-in value and cost of a new mower. note#1 Reinders, Inc. New Mower $12,095.00 Trade-In Value $1,250.00 Total cost to purchase New Mower $10,845.00 note#2 Russo Power Equipment New Mower $12,125.00 Trade-In Value $No Offer Total cost to purchase New Mower $12,125.00 Quote#3 Carol Stream Lawn&Power New Mower $12,399.00 Trade-In Value $500.00 Total cost to purchase New Mower $11,899.00 The mower purchase was budgeted in the FY 13 budget. Park Board has approved the trade-in and is requesting approval from City Council to trade-in the 2003 Toro Mower to Reinders, Inc. at a value of$1,250.00. A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 440 Legal ■ PC #1 Finance ❑ EST. 1836 Engineer ■ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development ❑❑ PC 2013-01 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Salek Subdivision Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: Approval of a revised Final Plat of Subdivision due to minor scrivener's error. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: CC 1-22-13 Action Taken: Final Plat of Subdivision Approval Item Number: PC 2013-01 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See attached memorandum and draft ordinance. Clr` Memorandum .Z0 '0 To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director EST. _ 1836 CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator ��— Date: March 20, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-01 —Salek Subdivision of Lion's Pool Request for Resubdivision and Final Plat Approval <LE As you may recall, the request for Final Plat approval for an approximately 3-acre property to be resubdivided into three single-family residential lots located at 512 E. Main Street was brought before the City Council and approved at the January 22, 2013 meeting. Since that time, a minor revision has been made to the recently approved plat to address a scrivener's error and include the phrase "Per the temporary easement agreement between the City and the Yorkville Lions Club dated May 14, 2005, the City will waive sewer and water connection fees for the platted lots on the property." The addition of this phrase was included to reflect and further memorialize the Temporary Easement Agreement ("Agreement") granted by the prior property owners, the Yorkville Lions Club,which allowed the City to install a sanitary sewer main in exchange for the waiver of sewer and water connection fees. A copy of the agreement as well as the revised Final Plat of Subdivision is attached for your review. Staff is seeking the approval of an amended ordinance which now references the revised Final Plat as "2012-0170 PLAT" rather than identifying the approved plan by the date stamped used on the previously submitted plat. Should the City Council have any questions regarding this matter, staff will be available at Tuesday night's meeting. " David F. Rolewick RQLEWICK & GUTZKE P. C. John Dirk Gutzke & r y1 3 Justin J. Karubas ft ,' ATTORNEYS AT LAW J. Matthew Pfeiffer ku. Edward R. Sherman' s� Of Counsel May 16 , 2005 lames E. Hundman i 'Also admitted in Iowa John J . Wyeth , Esq . City Attorney United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville , Illinois 60560 RE : YORKVILLE LIONS CLUB Proposed Easement Agreement for Sanitary Sewer Main LIONSC - 01 Dear John : Please find enclosed the originally executed Temporary Easement Agreement , a copy of which was faxed to you earlier today . After it has been recorded , kindly furnish a copy of the recorded document to this office . i Sincerely , i ROen UT KE , P . C . Jo zke i i JDG / cng CC .* Drew Sykes i ICI i I r Danada West Professional Center 1776 South Naperville Road, Suite 104A Wheaton, Illinois 60187 -8133 Telephone: (630) 653 - 1577 24 Hour Fax: ( 630) 653 - 1579 E-mail: rg®rglawfirm.com i i i i ,0-5/ 13/2005 14 : 04 RQLEWICK & GUTZKE P . C . 16308522520 NQ . 324 1?03 i WT 0 6 20D5 STATE OF ILL NI OIS ) COLTINTY OF KENDALL } GRANT O )F TEMPCII2 AIx Y CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT hGnf-1VfE.N7 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS ; THAT the Grantors : :Yorkville Lions Swim Club, Inc i , n consideration of the sure of Ten and 00/ 100 Dollars ($ 10. 00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged do hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey to the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , a Municipal Corporation, its successors, and assigns, hereinafter referred to as Grantee, in consideration of the covenants to be kept and performed by the Grantee herein, a temporary construction easement to construct, maintain, and operate public utilities underground and further the right of access to said area for the maintenance and repau of said utilities if any are actually as installed in, upon, and across the tract of land described as follows, to-wit: That part of the Northeast Quarter of Saction 33 , Township 36 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows : Commencing at the ,point of izitersection of the centerliz a of McHugh Road with the south line of East Main Street, as shown on the plat of Woodworth Subdivision, in the United City of the Village of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois ; thence South 89°43 '28 " East along said south line 439. 94 feet; thence easterly along said south line; being along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 1666 . D0 feet, for 221 . 14 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continuing easterly along the last described curve 34 . 81 feet; thence southeasterly along a curve to the right having a radius of 25 . 00 feet which is radial to the last described curve at the last described point. 40 . 04 feet; thence southerly along a curve to the right having a radius of 570 .00 feet which is radial to the last described curve at the last described point, 150. 0 feet; thence South 8 ° 19 ' 16 " West, along a line which is tangent to the last described curve at the last described point, 1 10 . 15 feet; thence North $ 9 143 ' 28 " West 60 . 60 feet; thence North 8 019 ' 16 " East 11 $ . 63 feet to a point of curvature; thence northerly along a curve to the left, having a radius of 5 10. 00 feet for 158448 feet to the Point of Beginning, in Bristol Township, Kendall County, Illinois . Said ;rant of easement is made under the additional following terms and conditions ; The Grantor hereby grants the right of ingress and egress to said temporaxy construction easement to Grantee , The Grantee herein shall and hereby agrees to : 1 . Restore the surface of said temporary easement to the condition thereof existing at the time of entry upon same, and shall leave the surface of such easement level and free of all debris, rocks in excess of two inches (211), and gravel, and providing a covering x/ 13/2005 14 : 04 ROLEWICK & GUTZKE P . C . 3 16308522520 N0 . 324 D04 of a minimum of six inches (6") of clean, black., fertile top soil and replanting of grass whenever disturbed. 2 . Replace all lot lines and property line stakes moved or disrupted in the course of performing workiug connection with the purpose of which the easement herein is granted. 3 . Said easement shall be treated as a covenant running with the land. 4 . Said easement shall be binding upon the successors, heirs, and assigns of each ply hereto . 5 . 4a IN WITNESS WHER OF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal this day of c� 2005 , *As further consideration , Grantee will waive sewer and water connection fees t-tl for up to six ( 6) lots on Grantor ' s t adjacent property . Yorkv J116 Lio s Swi a Giu' U,Tnc . by Drew Sykes , President i STATE OF ILLINOIS } COUNTY OF IZNDALL } i Drew• Sykes y allege and stale that lie has read the i foregoing Grant of Temporary Construction Easement Agreement by him subscribed, that he has knowledge of the facts and contents contained therein, and that the facts as alleged therein are true in substance and in fact, ! c )t Yorkville on m u , Inc . by Drew Sy es , President Subscribed and sworn to before me, + 200 Notary 1Jubl16 . ,y.4,4a40M C AL SEALaaaat+W y 'I' TRACY JOHNSON � Prepared by and return to : NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS ". MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 04A)W= +` Attorney John Justin '(xvyeth ; c a<<�iaa aacaaoassau 800 Game Farm Road. Yorkville, Illinois 60560 (630) 553 =4350 I i • I i i i UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE i KENDAL COUNTY, ILLINOIS I ORDINANCE .NO 2013 -06 E i I i AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKV LE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS , APPROVING THE SALEK SUBDIVISION OF LION ' S POOL FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION I Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville , Kendall County, Illinois This 22°d day of January, 2013 i Prepared by and Return to : United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 I I Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council I of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois on March 11 , 2013 . I i Ordinance No . 2013 - O � AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVI E KENDAL COUNTY, ILLINOIS , APPROVING THE SALEK SUBDIVISION OF LION'S POOL FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION WHEREAS , the United City of Yorkville (the " City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1 970 and the laws of the State ; and, WHEREAS , Kyle and Kelly Salek (the "Petitioner") have filed an application and p etition for approval of the Salek Subdivision of Lion 's Pool Final Plat of Subdivision for the subdivision of an a PProximately three acre P P roerty located at 512 East Main Street on the southwest corner of East Main Street and Bruell Street into three (3 ) lots for one- family residences ; and, j WHEREAS , the Plan Commission convened and held a public hearing on the 9th day of � January, 2013 , to consider the Salek Subdivision of Li"on 's Pool. Final Plat of subdi' vision after publication of notice and notice to P t y roper owners Within five hundred (500) feet of the Subject Property," and WHEREAS , the Plan Commission reviewed the standards set forth 1" n Chapter 3 and 4 of Title I of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance and made a recommendation to the � Mayor and City Council the Corporate Authorities ") for approval of the subdivision and the Salek Sitbduvision Of L101? - s Pool Final Plat of Subdivision ., NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of � i Yorkville , Kendall County, Illinois , as follows : Section 1 . The above reel tals are incorporated herein and made a p art of this Ordinance . Section 2. That the Corporate Authorities hereby approve the Salek of Lion 's Pool Final Plat of SUbdivision for the property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto � and made a part hereof by reference, with Property Index Number of c`�d • 33 - a 5a • DOa , ie ared b Todd Surveying date stam ed January 3 2013 b the Community Develo ment p ' p Y p � Y P Department attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhi" bi" t B , and authorize the Mayor, City j Clerk, City Administrator and City Engineer to execute said Plat . Section 3. That ,,.he City Clerk is hereby authorized pursuant to Section 11 -2 - 3 . H of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance to file a copy of this ordinance and the alek Subdii)ision o Ligon 's Pool Final Plat of Subdivision with the Kendall County Recorder of Deeds within 30 days from the date of the approval of this Ordinance . Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval , and publication as provided by law . Ordinance No . 2013 - Dip I Page 2 ', i i Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of �� V' " , A. D . 2013 -t j CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS � DIANE TEELlNG l I KEN KOCI I � JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI \ CARLO COLOSIMO I MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT � i I Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois , this ' dayof 1::E6Pu4e- V 2013 . -wc -(0 MAY R i i i I i i I I i I E Ordinance No 2013 - 90 I Page 3 EXHIBIT A Legal e s c l" on iS Ordinance No . 2013 - 0(p_ Page 4 i i I THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS POLICY IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : 1 THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST 1 /4 OF SECTION 33 , TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH , RANGE 07 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF MCHUGH ROAD WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST MAIN STREET, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF "WOODWORTH SUBDVISION , " THE UNITED CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE , KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS "I THENCE SOUTH 89 DECREES , 43 MINUTES , 28 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 227 . 94 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BRGINNING ; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES , 43 MINUTES , 28 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 2 FEET,, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE ; BEING ALONG A TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE LEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1 , 666 . 0 FEET, 255 . 94 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25 . 0 FEET WHICH IS RADIAL TO THE LAST DESCRIBED CURVE AT THE LAST DESCRIBED POINT, 40 . 04 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 570 . 0 FEET WHICH 1S RADIAL TO THE LAST DESCRIBED CURVE AT THE LAST DESCRIBED POINT , 150 . 0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8 DEGREES , 19 MINUTES , 16 SECONDS WEST, ALONG A LINE WHICH IS TANGENT TO THE LAST DESCRIBED CURVE AT THE LAST DESCRIBED POINT, 710 , 15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES , 43 MINUTES , 28 SECONDS WEST 478 -. 83 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN SOUTH OQ DEGREES 16 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST PERPENDICULAR TO SAID SOUTH LINE FROM THE PAINT OF BEGINNING , THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES , 16 MINUTES , 32 SECONDS EAST 2 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING , IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL , KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS , i i i i i i i i i E i I X{-41 gi i C� WHIM CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY PLAN Coula-wON CERnnCATE FINAL PLAT EASEMENT DRAINAGE PUBLIC UTI(Itt AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT STATE CC ILLINOIS) 1V SS ^. BASIS OF BEARINGS SALEK SUBDIVISION OF LION'S POOL A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR ARO GRANTED TO SBO MRRITFCH.NICER,COY ED,VOTES WIERCABI£OTHER PUBLIC UTUTHE COUNTY C1�KDNALL) AND ff0EDFA5 OF EXISTING fRV1Cl/5£S GRANTED BY THE Ott O'YORKNLLE,IWNOS AND THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS NN ASSGIS WITHIN n+f APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY WE FWf Ca70/SAOV OF THE _ V Y The Southerly Right of Way Line of BEING A SUBDiVISION OF PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE AREAS SNONll ON THE PLAT AS PUBLIC UTILITY h DRAINAGE EASEMENT'(eaOm1f,I(d P.U. k D.E) To CONSTRUCT, wsiALL,RECO'+sRiucr REPAIR, Easl Main Street REMOVE,REPLAC4 INSPECT MNHTAIII AND OPERATE UNDERGROUND TRAIISMISAOI RIO OSIRIBUT IN SYSTEMS NID LINES UNDER THE SURFACE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE IWNO'S THIS DAY OF 2015 f NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE PUBLIC UVuTY k DRAINAGE EASEUENP,DICLU0.71G KHNWT(IMITATION TO TELEPHONE CABLE,CAS MAWS,ELECTRIC LHLES CABLE TELEVISION LYR`SS AND ` Assumed Bea ing of 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN 7HE UNITED CITY OF ALL NECESSARY FACILITIES APPURTENANT THERETO,TOGETHER KITH THE NGHr OF ACCESS THERETO FOR THE PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY AND S 89'43'28 E REQUIRED FOR SUCH USES AND PURPOSES RIO TOGETHER HIM THE RIGHT TO IISTALL REQUIRED SERVICE CCRNECPOIIS UNDER THE SURFACE CF EACH YORKWLLE, TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. LOT To SERVE IMPROVEMENTS THEREOYI. 40' 0 40' 80' A HOI-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT IS ALSO HEREBY RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO THE VA710 CITY OF YLMKNLIF,NMNOS 70 CO751RUCT INSTALL, CHAIRMAN RECONSTRUCT, PEPA'II, REMOVE REPLACE AN INSPECT FAdLLVES FOR THE MANSMISSXW MID OJSMBURON OF WATER, STORU SEWERS, SANITARY SEWERS MID ELECTRICITY,HITIII THE AREAS SHOKN ON TIE PLAT AS PUBLIC UPUTY&DRAINAGE EASEMENT, TOGETHER WITH A RIGHT OF ACCESS CITY CdMIOL CERTIRGTE SCALE 1'=40' L� THERETO FOR THE PERSONNEL AND EQUfPMEIr NECESSARY AND REQUIRED FOR SUCH USES AND PURPOSES STATE OF IWl1d$ EAST MAIN STREET GL )(- '9 THE ABOVE NAMED ESTIPES ARE HEREON CRANED THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON EASEMENTS HEREIN DESCRIBED FOR THE USES HERON SET FORTH AND THE J Point Of Polnt O( Ma<Inlue Oeecot-i Bs'RS11 0l K'ay) ?LA RIGHT i0 WT,TRFl,OR REMOVE ANY TREES,SHRUBS OR OTHER PLANTS KIMIN THE AREAS DESIGNATED AS PUBLIC UnUry AND ORNf7AG£FASEMENP SS CDmmencin 7Ie sw k Lm,or EufH u. s+rrl CH=255.76'CB=N 05'57'31'E S3.a9 WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE CONSTRUCT I1,IN5IAILATION,RECONSTRUCTION,RIDN FEIOVAL FFPIACET EIl,PERMANENT 6 01u OPERATION OF 01? [WITTY OF KENDALL)) g Beginrilng WDERGROU7D TRAISMISSNO, AND DISTRIBURO N SYSTEMS AND FACILITIES APPURTENANT THERETO. ff0 PfR11,lDIT WRONGS SIRUCIURES LR APPROVED ANO ACCEPTED BY THE MAYOR.ND CITY COUNCIL d:HE UNITED CITY OF S B9'43,26"E 212.00' R=1665.96 1--256'DI L=145.97' — O OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED U7,UPON,CR OVER ANY AREAS DESIGNATED AT PPURP PURPOSES UTILITY T DRAINAGE HOT EASEMENT;BUT SUCH AREAS MAY YORKVILLE NJNOS THIS ACCEPTED DAY OF 20f5 L� (227.84) —————— ' — — �, VE USED FOR CARO M,5HRVBS TREES;LANDSCAPING,OVId"AY5,N10 OTRFR RELATED FURPOSES THAT 00 HOT UNREASONABLY INTERFERE WIEH THE d, 155.56' 10'P.U.&D.E 56.94 L=110.04' 1 I m USES HERON DESCRIBED. O I z r—————— v I I THE OCCUPATION RIO USE OF THE HON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT HEREIN CRN/TED AND RESERVED FOR THE ABOVE NAMED ENDRES BY EACH OF SUCH 1Y, I I I 1�&BEE I 0, Tdl• Lh� I I I 01nTES SHALL BE DONE LN SUCII A MANNER SO AS Nor TO ONERFEAF KITH OR PRECLUDE THE OCCUPATION MID USE IMREOF BY OTHER ENTITIES FOR 1 WHICH SUCH EASEMENTS ARE GRAIITED VINO RESERVED. THE CROSSING AND RECROSSING OF SAID EASEMENTS BY THE ABOVE NAMED ENTITIES SHALL BE MAYOR a° 40'Bu7dn Une 40'N?dne Lne I r DONE IN SUCH A MANNER So AS NOT TO INTERFERE KITH, DAMAGE, OR DISTURB AIY TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS AND FADUnES o In APPURTENANT THERETO EXISTING KIMIN THE EASEMENTS BEING CROSSED OR RECROSSED,f10 USE OR OCCUPATION OF SAID EASEMENTS BY THE ABOVE I 9 I I I I o E-c NAMED EH ITIES SHALL CAUSE ANY CHANGE IN GRADE OR IMPAIR OR CHANCE THE SURFACE DRAYAGE PATTERNS. cti CITY CLERKS GERTf1CATE .�-Ir I I I I I I I Nom' FGLLOWffO ANY KORK TO BE PERFORMED BY THE UNITED CITY W YARKNLLE II THE EXERCISE OF ITS EASEMENT RIGHTS HfRE'i CRATED,S,0 dR' I b I I 'I K SMALL NAB£NO DD(IcAnd!HI7N RESPECT 70 SURFACE RESTORATION,NNIXUDING WT NOT LIMITED TO,THE RESTORATION,REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF SLATE OF fU177d5) �� C I I I I I I I a U `a PAVEMENT CURB,CUTTERS TREES LAWN OR SHRUBBERY,PROVIDED,HOWEVER THAT SAID CITY SHALL BE ORUCATED,FOLLONRfC SUCH MAINTENANCE MURK,TO BACKnLI NN HOUND ALL TRENCH CREATED SO AS To RETAIN SWFABLE DRAINAGE,TO COLD PATCH ANY ASPHALT OR CO'ICREIE SURFACE,TO ,) S� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I� p e REMOVE ALL EXCESS DEBRIS AN SPOT,AND To LEAVE THE UANTE MICE AREA IN A GENERALLY CLEAN RIO WORWANUKE CONOPW. COUNTY OF KENDALL „ APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CY'THE UtfilED CITY OF n y I _ a o LNI o FASENEIi PROVISIONS YO RI(VU E,ILLINO'S BY ORDINANCE ft—AT A MEETING HELD THIS o I I I Rn DAY A� 2015 `Z Ib o I N IJ N = LOT 3 I Yi v 5'4 A HON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR SERVING THE SUBDIVISION LOT 1 8 d I �5 (D.IJ Acres) W I m (LW Arr ro I W I I' (1.07 Aae:) I I n MID OTHER PROPERTY S HEREBY RESERVED FLR AIM GRANTED TO I SERVICE I I wnRQd H4mp smlxn I I e � L, _ T'n CN recolm 7i 1rM aw!R ni In: � f CONlOmEALTH EOSOV CO/PNIY,AMER11Far RUNds o.k.o.ILLINOIS BElI.TELEPHONE COMPANY,GRANTEES; 6 N (7 awls Ine Let 3 M CITY CLERIC e 'o i I t0 i I„ I o y' II U THOR RESPECTIVE LICD75EE Sf1ClE55(X7S N10 A59GlS JO'NRY NND SEVERALLY 70 COlSTRUCi, [PERAIF, REPAIR, OLNT! Y, NCOUY, 14 o p I FECQYSTRUCi,FEPUC£ SUPPIEUEIi Rf10CAlE A70 REMOVE FROf PMF 70 TIM£ PONS GUYS, ANCHOR$ KIRFS CABLES AND DIST BUTTON F 6 p o I 7RANSfORfMERS PED£STAIS EOIIPMEDT CADNNEiS OR OTHER FAtlUTIES USED IN CO1N£CPON WITH UIlOFRCROUIN THE PROPS AN DISTRIBUTION MI THIN OF i EIECTR1tliY,COMMWGCAnOV SQUADS NN AOlIALS IN,0V4Tt UNHDER,A[ROSS ALONG AND UPON THE SURFACE CF THE PROPERTY 9NOHN WITHIN THE CITY AWIHSTRAtORS CERTIFICATE I I i I I I Z I °I I I DARNED OR DOTTED(I1NE5(a ynTcr gnalbn)ON THE PLAT AND MARXED EVS£MENl;ViH1TY EASE7IEIP, 9UBlK UP(ITY EASEMENT; AND HE W slmlor des#gnollm)), Tllf PROPERTY DESGUIFD IN THE DECLARATKVI O LDNNOI!MUM Af10/OR OI TOS PLA7 AS CR=AND AND THE STATE OF IWl(OS) � �-5 P.U.&O.E °I �� "' PRQ°ERtt DESGNATO O!THE PUT AS COLI1fOl AREA OR AREAS;A10 THE PROPERTY D£5Ip7A1ED W THE PUT FOR CHHLETS AND ALLEYS R WHETHER I-IO'P.0&D.E. P.U.&D.E. PUBLIC C14 PRIVATE TOGETHER WITH THE RKdHi TO INSTALL RfOXRED SERVICE CCRNECRONS UNDER NNE SI/RFACE O'EACH LOT EM GOURDS AREA OR COUNTY OF KENDALL)) I - -�� I - —�-_ 5'P.U.&D--I _ _ IO b AREAS TO SERVE NPROYEIFNTS TIERED!,ONi ON UJA[ENT LOTS N70 COMMON AREA OR AREAS,TILE PoGHT TO CV I.TRIM M REMOVE TREES BUSHES APPROVED N70 ACCEPTED BY THE CITY ADMIISTUTOR OF ME 5'P.U.AD.. ' I I ROUTS SA1PLI!(GS N10 TO PEAR OBSTRUCTIONS fROM THE SURFACE AD SUBSURFACE AS NAY BE REASONABLY REQUIRED INOONT TO THE FIGHTS L I 1 1ffRDRI GV47,N70 THE RIGHT TD OR OVER UPON 7HE SUBTY IM I THE A ED ALL OFTE PURPOSES OBSIRUCPOif SHALL WOT BE FR M OVER 50 Bukdng Line 50 Bu7dn9 We ( SO Buidn9 the r'�'-F-! d7ANEEES'FAQURES Ot I7,UPON OR OVER THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE DASHED OR DOTTED LINES(or aE PRIOR deaf PJFYEH O WE PLAT VINO MARKED Uf11T0 CITY OF YORKVILLE,FNl(OS 7105----DAY OF 2015 I I I I N A EASEMENT;1 NUYy EASEMENT,PUBLIC Unutt EASEMDIP,P.U.F.'(ar fVeTa eearpnatNcn), KITHWr THE PRIOR HRITTE7!CONSENT O'7HE CRAlTES. AFTER INSTALLATION OF ANY SUCH FACILITIES THE GRADE OF THE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTY SHALL NOT BE ALTERED II A MANNER SO AS TO INTERFERE VIW I I I I 9 THE PROPER OPDUnO7 NID MAINTENANCE MMECI. I r o TINE TERM CO MOH ELEMENTS'SHALL HAVE THE MW,7NG SET FORTH FOR SUCH TERM IL THE CO'(DCNfu;VX(PROPERTY ACT;(NUTTER 765 0.05 CITY ADII ISTRATOR L——— ——— —— J L_ ___ — — — — L. L_ _ — ——— — — ' -� CQ 605/2,AS AMENDED TROY TIME TO TIME 155.56' 166.41 IO'P.U.&OAF. 156,86' THE TERM COUL(O7 AREA OR AREAS'IS DEFINED AS A LOT,PARCEL OR AREA OF THE RF11 PROPERTY,THE BINEF?CIAL USE MID ENJOYMENT OF WINCH Is RESERVED IN KHOLE O2 AS AN APPORTIONMENT TO THE SEPARATELY OWNED LOTS PARCELS 00 AREAS KITHII THE PLANNED DEVEIOPUENi, CITY DldNEER'S CERTIFICATE N 89'43'28" iY 478.83' EVEN WINCH SLAIN MAY BE OTHERKIS£DESIGNATED O7 THE PLAT BY 1FRV5 SUCH AS 9(IROIS; CdAMO7 N EEITS; CPEN SPACE; L PR AREA: CO.UMW GROUND, PARIONG; MID CDMUON AREA' THE TERMS COMMON AREA OR AREAS'AN CONMOI FLE7/E715'INCLUDE REAL PROPERTY STATE CY,ILLINOIS lmc W',dN SURFACED WITH INTERIOR DRIVEWAYS AID WALKWAYS,BUT EXCLUDES REAL PROPERTY PUMCALLY OCCUPIED BY A BUILDII7G,SERVICE BURtIESS DISTRICT SURVEYOR'S CERYMCATE OR STRUCTURES SUCH AS A POOL,RETENPON POND OR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. )SS STATE OF ILLINOIS) D,h[erpxotrd R-z Me-FanTy Resfdncf RELOCATIO!QU FACILITIES K!LL BE DOTE BY GRANTEES AT COST of THE GRANTOR/LOT OWNER,UPON KRIM FEWEST. COUNTY OF KENDALL) )SS LM1Ned dry of Ycr ,Na p w smuo(101 E Wv]) COUNTY OF KENDALL) OWNERttBP CERnnCATE 1, 0 DICINEER FOR THE UNITED CITY OF THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT 1,MICHEL G ENSALACO, ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LINO SURVEYOR NO. J5-2768, AT KENDALL COUNTY RIGHT TO FARM STAIEMEIT MORTGAGEE'S GERRECATE STATE OF ILUNCIS) YORWU&DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE R£EXRRED TMPROVENE TS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED THE REQUEST OF HE OKNER(S) HEREOF, HAVE SURVEYED, STIB0IV AND PLATTED THE FOLLOKINO STATE OF ) )SS OR THE REWIRED GUARANTEE COLLATERAL HAS BEEN POSTED FOR THE COMPLEROI OF ALL NOTICE: COUNTY OF KEtOAL) REWIRED NPROEME IS. DESCRIBED PROPERTY: )[s KENDALL COUNTY HAS A LONG,RICH TRADITION IN DATED AT YORKYLL£,ILLINOIS THIS DAY BE .2017. THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RHACE 7,EAST OF THE THIRD AGRICULTURE AND RESPECTS THE ROLE THAT FARMING COUNTY OF ) THIS THE ATTACH 0 LAAT MID HAVE CAUSED THE SAME TO BE SURVEYED,SUBDIVIDED AIM CONTINUES TO PLAY IN SHAPING THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF' HOLDER OF A MORTGAGE ON THE PROPERTY PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCING AT HE POINT OF WIERSECTION OF HE CENTER HE COUNTY. PROPERTY THAT SUPPORTS THIS INDUSTRY IS - PLATTED AS SHOWN BY THE PUT FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES AS INOCA/ED THERfdN, LINE OF MCHUGH ROAD WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF EAST MAIN STREET,AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF'KOBOWVMTH INDICATED BY A ZONING IN707CATOR-A-1 OR AG SPECIAL OESGaBED HEREUL HEREBY CONSENTS 7D ME EXECUTION AND RECOROI7G QP THE ABOVE NN DOES HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE MID ADOPT THE SAME INNER THE STILE MID TEE tlry DIGNEER SUBDIVISION'. THE UNITED CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF YORXVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY ILLINOIS HENCE SOUS VINO fORfCO71C PLAT OF SUBDIVISION AND HEREBY ---- 115 MORTGAGE E OF THE THEREON INOCATO. 89'43'28'EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 227.94 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEONNINC, THENCE SOUTH 89'43'28' USE. ANYONE SHOULD BE AQUA A RESIDENCE OR FACILITY HEAR AS DOCUMENT NUMBER W THE OFFICE VI THE THIS ZONING SHOULD BE AWARE THAT NORMAL ACR/CULWRAL RECORDER CF DEEDS COUNTY, RuNdS N ALL C!• THE PROVISIONS THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DEDICATES FOR PUBLIC USE WE WfOS SHOWN ON THIS PUT EAST AMC SAID SOUTH LINE 212,00 FEET,• THENCE EASTERLY ALONC SAID SOUTH LINE,BEING ALONG A PRACTICES MAY RESULT 111 OCCASIONAL SMELLS,DUST,SIGHTS, THEREoF, FOR THOROUGHFARES STREETS ALLEYS AND PUBLIC SERVICES AND HEREBY ALSO RESERVES O11Ntt CLERK'S rERnncATE CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 1665.98 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 85'57'JI'EAST, NOISE,AND UNIQUE HOURS OF OPERATION THAT AREARE NINE FOR AIY ELECTRIC,CAS TELEPHONE,CABLE N OR OTHER IELECOMNUfIGTIDNS COMPANY C 255.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A TYPICAL IN OTHER ZO`71NG AREAS INS WTHESS KHEREOF,SAN HAS CAUSED THIS LIMNER FRAICHISE Ap EE Eli KITH THE U,'UlET1 CITY OF YOFXNLL£TIER SUCCESSORS A!D CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 5J100'47'EAST,J9.73 FEET,' HENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A WRVS TO HE RIGHT INSIRUME T TO BE SIGNED BY ITS DULY AVINORI7ED C?7C£RS O7 ITS BEHALF AT ASSIGNS,THE EASEMENT PROV4SOIS WHICH ARE STATED ITREDI. STATE OF RUttCIS HAVING A RADIUS OF 570.03 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 0048'32'WEST,150,00 FEET; THENCE INS _DAY O' ,� PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE TRAIL EAS£LlENT PROVISIO`7S TD—. THE U1IDERSGNED FURTHER CERTIFlES THAT ALL QU THE LAND INCLINED IN INS PLAT LIES COUNTY OF KENDAL} SOUTH 0879'16'BEST 110.15 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89'43'28'WEST,478.83 FLIT TO A LINE DRAWN SOUTH NIHRH THE BOUNDARIES OF YORKVILLE COMHUMTY UNIT SCHOOL DISTINCT 115. 00'16'32'BEST PERPENDICULAR TO SAO SOUTH LINE FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH OO16'J2- THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,ITS SUCCESSORS (Sank Name and Addceso) 1, COUNTY CIERK OF KENDALL COUNTY,nU11OS,DO HEREBY EAST,260.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,IN THE TOK745HJP OF BRISTOL,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. LICENSEES AND ASSIGNS,ARE HEREBY CIVM EASEMENT NInNESS OUR NAN MID SEAL AT YORXVILLE, wf1dS MIS DAY O' CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE NO DEUNQUDIT GENERAL TAXES NO UNPAID CURRENT TAXES NO CONTAMNC 3.00 ACRES MORE OR LESS. RIGHTS OVER ALL AREAS ON THE PLAT MARKED 2015 WIPAID FORFEITED TAXES AND HO REDEEMABLE TAX SALES ACAIIIST ANY OF THE LAND PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT, 'BIKE HAIL EASEMENT-, INCLUDED W THE PLAT HEREIN DRAWN. I FURTHER COMFY THAT I HAVE RECOVEO All I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE PUT HEREOV DRAWN IS A CORRECT AND ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF SAID PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE HAIL EASEMENT'OR'STORMWATER STATUTORY FEES IN CONNECTION KITI THE PLAT HEREIN DRAWIL SURVEY AID SUBDIVISION. ALL DISTANCES ARE SHOWN W FEET AND DECIMAL PARTS THEREOF. MANAGEMENT EASEMENT,TO CONSTRUCT,INSTALL, OVEN MATER MY HAND AN SERE OF THE COUNTY pELK AT YORKVILLE; 1 FURTHER CERTIFY THAT HO PART O'THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN A SPECIAL FLOW RECONSTRUCT,REPAIR,REMOVE,REPLACE,INSPECT, HAZARD AREA AS IOEHTIFED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY BASED ON FIRM 17093 C MANTAO AND OPERATE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE TRAILS Allot By. OWNEI KYLE SALEK OWNER:KELLY SAIfX R1U77d5,THIS DAY OF 20fJ. PAVED OR UNPAVED,FOR HE USE AND ENJOYMENT OF HE Printed!fame and TUe 00450,DATED,FEBRUARY 4,2009,ALL OF THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZOYE X,AREAS DETERMINED TO BE GENERAL PUBLIC. THE ABOVE NAMED ENTITIES ARE HEREBY OUTSIDE THE 0.2R ANNUAL CHANCE FOOD. GRANTED THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON EASEMENTS HEREIN VOTARY GERnEUIE DESCRIBED FOR THE USES HEREIN SET FORTH AND THE Allkst By. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT ALL SUBOIVISION MONUAIENTS KILL BE SET AID I HAVE DESCRIBED THEY ON THIS RIGHT TO CUT, TRIM,OR REMOVE ANY TREES,SHRUBS OR PkIl<d Nome and TY. STATE OF IWI(OIS) COUNTY OERK "UAL PLAT AS REQUIRED BY THE PLAT ACT(765 ILCS 205n. THE EXTERIOR SUBDIVISION MONUMENTS HAVE OTHER PLANTS WfHIN HE EASEMENT AREAS HEREIN ss BEEN SET AND INTERIOR MONUME Ts KILL BE SET K7HIN 12 MONTHS OF THE RECORDING OF THIS PUT GRANTED WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE MfISTRUCTION, HE� �'£SY81-J�lE COU+Ntt CT_) CITY 1TI1�___TY EASEMENTS (SECTION 1270-56 OF THE ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ACT OF 1989) NNSTALUTOY,RECONSTRUCnaN,REPAIR,REMOVAL, L NOTARY PUBLIC RN RIO FOR THE STATE RID REPLACEMENT,INSPECNOH,MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION STATE OF ILW101S) COUNTY AFORESAID,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE UNITED CITY OF YORXVILLE,IT'S SUCCESSORS,LICENSEES AND ASSIGNS, I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE PLAT HEREON DRAKN IS SIHATED HITHIN THE THEREOF,NO TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT BUILDINGS, ARE HEREBY GIVEN O CASEMENT IT'S 70 ALL PUTTED EASEMENTS CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS, BIRCH IS EXERCISING THE SPECIAL POKERS STRUCTURES OR OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE PLACED ON OR COUNTY OF KENDALL)) KYLE SALEX NM KELLY SALEK,PERSOIfAILY KNOW i0 ME TO BE THE SAME PERSONS KN05E AUTHORIZED BY DIVISION 12 OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL CODE AS AMENDED. OVER SAID EASEMENTS THAT INTERFERE WfTH THE RIGHTS 11,1£5 ARE SUOSCRI8ED TO WE FOREGOING INsMIDIENT APPEARED BEFORE ME THIS DAY DESIGNATED*cry UTILITY EASEMENT OR OU,E'SAD EASEMENTS SHALL BE HEREIN GRANTED. ?HIS INSTRUMENT HO. WAS PLED FOR RECORD AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE EXEWnON OP THE MaIDU PUT NN ACCOMPANYING USED SOLELY TO INSTALL,OPERATE,MAINTAIN AND REMOVE FROM TIME TO gVLN UNDER!AY HAND AND SEAL AT Y04XNLL£ILLINOS, H!S—DAY OF_ 2013. IISTAUMENTS FOR THE USES NN PURPOSES MOZZIN SET FORTH AS IND.?FREE Alto TIME VIDERCROUNO FACILITIES AND APPUR7ENNICES USED fit CONNECTION 91 THE RECORDERS OnCF Of Kf7MALL COUNTY,RLNOS ON THIS VOLUNTARY ACT. WITH THE WATER,SANITARY SEWER OR STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS OF THE 20_.AT O'd.OdC �M, OVEN WIDER MY HAND RN NOTARIAL SEA IRS DAY OF UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,EXCEPT THAT THE EASEMENTS MAY BE GRADED AS DAY OF 2013. SWALES TO RECEIVE LOCAL SURFACE DRAINAGE NO PERMANENT BUILDING OR ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL(AND SURVEYOR,NO.2768 TREES SHALL BE PLACED OV SAID EASEMENT,BUT SAME MAY aF USED Foe License Ekphes 11-30-2014 GARDENS,SHRRBS, LANDSCAPING AID OTHER PURPOSES THAT DO HOT THEN OR LAYER INTERFERE KITH THE AFORESAID USES OR RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED. KENDALL COUNTY RECORDER NOTARY PUBLIC Cast "w SCALE 1'=SO' _ ar-d 31.,Dln k.lj. [y MIR113 7 13 13RNY P.L.S. 0113 XP- T13LIZ0132 �� Y111 OFand IA*ft. km PN,. D BRIO O.PEKCIRNY .L.B,3819 EYCP, 11M'J!7018 �� S S N W=Val 5-K.m R=R.&I w-L.0 JAW (`l �7 dl•Oo,l Atr,, a"11&dleah7 JAW 0 013 IFan[[IOwy uHn�urrenn•[[xv,en P.UdaE-FATS MII;Hr� /''l1 cc !.. ■rts�u,nmr,•,I,e MPMu Ems"mt nw• Mu.,•urr•• R/.N•L P.dALE-PMaGin trBkf *••PM;�:;;APP•••••= 2012-0170 PLAT Trd[elmnl inN[Y� I/Jtuufwus cvt.my uOTy Emrml ^eyra,dMaNi'/aH�dxalNaaSomH,el. DEPARTMENT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, APPROVING THE SALEK SUBDIVISION OF LION'S POOL FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois This_day of March,2013 Prepared by and Return to: United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville,IL 60560 Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County, Illinois on ,2013. ORDINANCE No. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,APPROVING THE SALEK SUBDIVISION OF LION'S POOL FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, Kyle and Kelly Salek (the "Petitioner") have filed an application and petition for approval of the Salek Subdivision of Lion's Pool Final Plat of Subdivision for the subdivision of an approximately three acre property located at 512 East Main Street on the southwest corner of East Main Street and Bruell Street into three (3) lots for one-family residences; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission convened and held a public hearing on the 9th day of January, 2013, to consider the Salek Subdivision of Lion's Pool Final Plat of Subdivision after publication of notice and notice to property owners within five hundred (500) feet of the Subject Property; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission reviewed the standards set forth in Chapter 3 and 4 of Title 11 of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance and made a recommendation to the Mayor and City Council ("the Corporate Authorities") for approval of the subdivision and the Salek Subdivision of Lion's Pool Final Plat of Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2. That the Corporate Authorities hereby approve the Salek Subdivision of Lion's Pool Final Plat of Subdivision for the property legally described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference, with Property Index Number of , prepared by Todd Surveying identified as project number 2012-0170 PLAT attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B, and authorize the Mayor, City Clerk, City Administrator and City Engineer to execute said Plat. Section 3. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized pursuant to Section 11-2-3.1-1 of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance to file a copy of this ordinance and the Salek Subdivision of Lion's Pool Final Plat of Subdivision with the Kendall County Recorder of Deeds within 30 days from the date of the approval of this Ordinance. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Ordinance No.2013- Page 2 Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2013. CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT MARTY MUNNS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2013. MAYOR Ordinance No.2013- Page 3 EXHIBIT A Legal Description Ordinance No.2013- Page 4 C'n'E"= C!FX nP.11FX Ea26WS lea!, Eazsw6u F anvcl, la nollg o\yX �,` a!dlual xal lacvu !u tcg• b'4�8' PE'= 6sgszFuau g BIKs bHONE P3D-ad3- 13Od !VX e3s-adS-22aa p1nIU0a6 E026W 6UF ADHKAIrrE• Irrimme POPeD bn4DE'= bn Rc nFX 3 30 RnMSEl VAEVnEl 2nuz E 301 3-01 -�O u cH=uuq ['6uaw CB=Cpo\g Bmlua CCISNEK910NE anHAEAwe hC btolsc{ Nnwpsc '5=F5oglnz T=y\c `suaFp 6130 tEa21ONVr rVND 2n9AEAIND 2ElSAICE2 2 = ZonFp M = MszF o� oz =NZsF Couc\sFs wounwsuF ICJ ICJ F1 / F A ysn' ps{s ysn pszcubpou =.Eonuq 1\S„ D!o' I\ou bibs siq MoiK Cowls{sq: V O=Eonuq 3 d„ D!o' I\ou blbs N b b1 EESIC C ' 6oKOESb1A b ' r ' as 32J2 EXb • J J \30\S01d ys{slsucs: sooa-oaOX W { cHEr b ' r ' ew SAe2 EXb• 1 1 \3C\S [] J wt BooK q: 50111 plsMUB . bw bis{ Y 2CdPE J „ = 3Q, C ' EN2VrVC ❑ ob lrrjt"� ry 001'116 n CI!su{: KXIs 2sIsK KEV1DVrr COnVlI iSECOISDEIS ---- --- --- - ' -_--_-__--Ir DU r141E15 IVilEKLAKE M11H IHE VLOl5E2tlID (12E2 OK 9ICHI2 HEUEIV1 C15VVlED" \+� ; Ao 'drlIFF" �o 1 ------------------------------------------- CVISDEVI2' 2Hn15B2' rVVID2CVbIV1C VVID O1HE25 bnI5602E2 IHV1 DO V101 iHEVI � g 115EE2 2HVrr BE brVCED OVI 2VID EV2AWEVIE Bn1 21ME WVJ, BE n2ED LOlS r - E JJ - 30-SOId :O :• nein .16b f c � IC6U26 X61162 � 2MVrE2 10 15ECEINE VOCVr 2n15LVCE D15VIV %10A4 VIO bEISWVVIE" I BnIrDIVC og 1//1141012 6150LE2210V1Vr rVV1D 2n15NExaK' "o- SV88 mfr WICFE( C En4II�CO � ------' SO nVi11ED CII)\ OL xOlSKNrVE' EXCEbl 1"141 IHE EV2EWEVII2 VWX BE eg'IDED V2 ----------------------------------- �� DV l OL ------------------- SO-- tll -------------- O,CrOCK --- W J 3' r CI NEVI nVDEFS SNP HVV1D VVD V101tllSlVr 2Etlr 1HI2 ---��------ DtlA OL MIIH IHE MVIELS' 2VVII1V15J 2EME25 OIS 2105W DISVIVIVCE 2J21EW2 OL IHE \ , iQr 0EEy\ ME nVIDE15CI50nVID LVCIrIDE2 VAD Vbbn151EV1VVCE2 n2ED IVi COVIVIECIIOVI v v °° r ftl� �E ��'' - 141 IHE ISECOKDEl5,2 OEtICE Ot KEInDVrr COnV11J IrrIV012' OVl 1HI2 ------- NOMV11tl16K VCl' n2ED IViE 110 1141211411' obELSV1E' OU c. IVI 11 2 1 FVKV " 12 H14 10 CINEVI nViDElS Wx H14VID 14VD 2EVr 141 1OlLKNIrrE' IrrIV1012' 1"12 D14 � OL -``�K C ---- SOJ3" IV121grIAN112 tOK THE n2E2 VV1D bn91b02E2 1HEgUV1 2E1 E0151H V2 1HEIK t15EE vV WEI "FLIED CIK nlVH AV2EWEV11 015 %qVV 2VID EV2EWEV12 2"1411 BE *y V HEKEIVI CJSVVlED" 1HI2 IV1215nWEV11 VIO' ------------------------- MV2 LIVED Log KEC015D VIAD VCKViOMrEDCED IHE EXECn110V1 Ot IHE tlV1VEXED 61'11 VV1D tlCCOWbtlV1JJV VlSE HAILED). CINEVI EX0gKM V 11122 1C 1411 brV11ED E142EWEV112 14n1HOl51SED B� DINI210V1 JS OL ViS11CrE JJ OL 1HA IrrIVI012 WnVI1CIbW CODE V2 VWAVIDED' ONEIS 2111D EV2EWEVII2 1"1411VI1E15LE15E MI1H IHE 151CH12 VtlWE2 '1SE 2n82CiI8ED 10 IHE LOFSECOIHIC IV121KnWEV11 VbbEVFSED BELa16E WE 1VA2 DV IHE nV111ED CI1J OL LOISKNrrE' 11,2 2nCCE220152' VICEV12EE2 VIA V221CV12' Co UbOJLV1E nAI 2 OL IHE NAIiFD CIi)\ OL XOISKNrrE' IMIAO12' MHICH 12 AXEl5C121VIC IHE 26ECIVr bOME152 2115nC1n15A2 O15 002115nC110V12 2HVrr BE brVCED OVI 015 CanVll� OL KEV1Dtlrr ) "rE 2tlrEK 11ViD KErr1 2tlrEK bE520V1tlrr1 KV10M 10 WE 10 BE IHE 2tlWE bE520V12 MH0 1 Ln151HEI5 CE151ILK 1HV1 THE b150bE251K 2HOMI4 DO IHE brVi ' HEI5EOV1 DISVN\" 12 21 mim MIIHIVI IHA IHAISEOL" IQ IEWb015119X 015 bEgvvq iEVli B(IIrDIV1C2' 21141E OL IrrIV1012 ) ) 22 COnH11 '1LOSE2tlID' HE16EB CES11L> lHtll CI1J nllrll� EV2EWEVi12 15Ebr14CEWEVIE IVI2bEC110V1' WVIVIAEVIVVICA VVID ObE15V110V f 1410114161 6nBrIC IVl tlVD LOU 1HE 21141E 140 (2EC110V JS �O- 2e OL IHE IrrIV1012 b150LE2210VVr rVVID 2nV5NE> 015 VCl OL 1683) IVI21WNBOVi' 15ECOVi21JSnC110V1' 15Eb14115' 15AW0!\Vr' ' BEEVI 2E1 'MD IV11E151015 WOVInWEV112 Mlrr BE 2Ei MIIHIVI 1S WOV11H2 OL 1HE 15ECOUDIVIC OL IH12 brVi OU' V iED MHICH i" IEKLE15E MII" IHE COVI2115nC110V1' FSECOFSDE15,2 CEFSIILIC'1lE COnH1� OL ----- ) COnV111 C( ESK LIVIVr 61141 142 ISEOfIIISED B> IHE 61141 VCi (\e2 IrC2 S02\)' IHE EX1E1510FS 2nBDlf\1210V1 WOOMFt112 HVNE 01HEF5 brVV112 WIN" IHE AV2EWEV11 VISEV2 HEUFM ) 22 -- I LfIJ51HEJ5 CE15BU 1HV1 WV 208DIN210V1 WOf1WEVi12 Mlrr BE 2E1 VVID I "\q /\E NKUIBED l"EW OVl 1"12 KICHi 10 Cnl 1151W' 015 15EWONE VViX. Il5AE2' 2HKn82 OLS byuJs Haws auq I!41s 21141E OL Iumm ) DE2CISIBED LOU THE n2E2 liEUEIV1 2EI L091H VVID THE Vctszl Bk - --- - - -� `-- I t Val Q MIME IHE 0"S\& VViow CH14VICE LrOOD" C15VV11ED IHE 151CH1 10 EV11E15 060141 EV2EWEH12 HEISEIVI o 141011415) CE1511LICtliE rrIV1012' iH12 ---------DVI OL ---------------- OOd2C' DV1ED' LED15nVV5 > d' Sooa" Vrr OL IHE 6150bEl51� 12 rOCVlED IH SOME X' VISE142 DElEl5WIV1ED 10 BE CEV1EL514r bnBrlC' 1HE 1480NE VIVWED AVIi111E2 1415E HEISEBK ---- SOJ3' HVSVKD V15AV 142 IDEVIIILIED BK L-IE LEDA15Vr EWElSCEVTK WVVIVCEWEVII 140EViCK 8142ED OVl LI15W 1033 C wD EVP10>,WEVIl of 1HA blNtsq Haws auq I!41s bV1M 015 kAD (%ED' LOIS IHE n2E r OMViEES YKIE ZWEK e1NEV1 nHDE16 W HVVD VVID 2E11r OL 1HA conVllA CrESK 141 oSKNrrE' i Ln151HE15 CElS11Ll 1"141 1410 bVISl OL iHA VBONE DE2C151BED bFSObE1511 12 rOC141ED MIIHIVI 14 26ECIVr Lr00D WVMIVIVI 14VID ObEIS141E bEDE21151VV1 VV1D 81C1C( E 11514112' 1141szF gl � ------------------- OWE " K -- - - - C -- - ------- 15ECOV12115nCE JSEMIJ5' FSEWONE' SEbrVCE' IV126EC1 21'11010161. LEE2 IH1 COVIVIEC110H MI1H IHE 61'11 HEISEIVI DISVMVI' 2n15NE>` VV1D 2nBDIN1210V1' Vrr DI21VV10E2 1415E 2HOMV1 IV1 LEE1 VV1D DECIWVr 6141512 iHELSEOL" WVVIVCEWEVIl EV2EWEV11� 10 CON2115nCE IH21Vrr' IV1CrnDED IH THE br'1I HE16EIVI DKVMVI' I Ln161HE16 CE911LK 1HV1 1 MME ISECEINED tlrr I Ln151HEI5 CE1511L,1 1"141 IHE 61141 HEISEOV D1514MV1 12 V C01515EC1 VV1D VCCnF5V1E LSE615E2EV11V110V1 OL 2V1D bEDE2115114V1 VVID BIKE 1IS140 EV2EWEVlin OIS n21015WMV1A15 -�- CUABD DAVI11ED E IVXFZ VUF 11VD TI FSEVII HVIrE 1VX 2VfE2 tlCtlIV121 VV1K OL 1HE NViD ,bEDE21151VVI EVHViN1,; BIKE 115141 EV2EWEVIJ>% CE------- 1_1_H_EISE__V_K_E_----IrIV16nEV11 CEV1EKVr 1VXE2' Ho MbVID CnKFSEHl 1VXE2' HO COVIIVIViIVIC 3" 00 VCFSE2' W015E OK rE22" 151CH12 O�E15 Vrr VJSEV2 OV IHE b�Vl WVJSKED � WE 1' COnV11A CrElSK oL KEV1Dtlrr ConV11l IrrIH012' DO HEISEBI EV2E Se0" VO LEEi 10 IHE b01V11 OL BACIVIVIIVIC' IVi 1HE IOMH12% OL B151210r' KEVIDVrr COnOix TVIVi012" rICEV12EE2 14VID 14221CV12' 1415E HElS�B� CINEVI EV2EWEVII MIIVIE22 OnlS HtlV1D 11V1D 2EVr 111 IOKKNrrE' IrrIVI012' 1HI2 OO.Je ,3S„ ME21 bEISbEVIDICnr1415 l0 2VID 20mH nIAE L150W IHE bum 0t BECIViVI ez 1HEVICE 1410151" OO.J8 ,3S„ IHE MA11ED CIIK OL KOUKNVVE' 112 MCCE220L52' � auK Haws auq Jggiszz) COnV11A OL KEHD'1rr ) MIIHIVI 1HE BOf\"DVISIE2 OL XOgKNrrE COWWnVIILI n0a 2CHOOr DI21161C1 112" 22 20nIH 08.UVDIn ME2E 110" 22 LEES 1HEVICE 1410151" 8a.d3,S8„ ME2E d \8" 83 LEEl 10 14 11141E DISVMV 2001" IHE nV1DElS21CV1ED LnlS1HE15 CE1611LIE2 1Htl1 Vrr OL IHE rtlVD IV1CrnDED IH IHI2 61'11 TIE 21tliE OL IrrIH10I2 ) HVNIVIC V ISVDIn2 OL 2 \0" 03 LEE I VVID V CHOSD BEVISIHC OL 20ni" o0.d8,3S„ ME2E 120" 00 LEAF iHEV10E bEDE21FSI14V1 14VD BIKE 1)51411 EV2EWEVII bk50N1210V2 SO � �'' CHOUD BE14KIVIC OL 2001" 23.00,4N„ EV2E 3a" N2 LEAF o i"FE 20n1HEl5rl 14rOVC V Cn15NE 10 IHE 151CH1 H2Mf® 1 I E 21CVAED e1M12 Dnrl Vn1H IS�D OLECEl52 0H �R2 BEHVfL tll V221CV12 IHE EV2EWEViI bKON210V12 MHICH VISE 21V1ED NElSE0V1'11112 01: COnVil1 CEE15K,2 CE1611LICtllE S2B" O1 LEEE 1HEVCE 20n1HE1421ELirl VrOV1C 14 Cn15NE 10 IHE ISICHI HVNVIC V K14DIn2 OL S2" 00 LEEl 14VD 14 1JbICVr IV O1HEI5 SOHIVC V15E142" 141 MI1V1E22 MHEFSEOE 2VID -- - - nHDEFS LlStlHCH12E tlCKEEWEVII MI1H IHE nV111ED CIlA OL lOFSKNrrE' 1HE116 2nCCE22052 '11411 HV2 Ctln2ED iH12 Cn25NE 10 IRE rELl H14NIVIC V ISVDIn2 OL lee2' a8 LEEi VV10 V CHOLiD DE14251NC OL 140151" 82 .2 ,31 „ EV21! VI012E' VVID 0141100E HON2 OL ObE15VI1OV1 IHVI 1415E 14101 Log VVi,I ErEC1161C' CV2' lErEBHOVE' NSVE 1N OLS 01HEJ5 IEfECOWWnVIICV110V2 COWbtlV1 , EV21 14rOOC 2VID 20n1H 11141E S1S" 00 LEES iHEVICA EV21FgTK W000 2VID 20n1H DIRE' BEIViO WOV1C V b16V 12 1ICE21C 2HOnrD ri VM1415A IH "141 2WArr2' Dn2E MH 2' 16EC016DEFS OL DEE02' nH Irr Log nHIDE1621C-ILV EV 219FM D 14FVF ZL016D bnBflC 2EFSNCE2' VV1D HE16EBK Vr20 KE2EV5!\E' Cll AVC --- 8a .33,S8 „ EV21 14rOVIC 2VID 2001" 11141E SSV' ad LEEI LOLL IHE 6011411 OL DECMVIIVICI IHEVICE 20niH 8a.d3,S8„ n2E" 00IWO 1E COV121�SnC11V1C V iH 1 VIOFSWVr VC151Cnr1n15Vr _ _ -_ � 141012 10 Vrr OL IHE bgON210V12 bnBrlC n2E 1HE NVID2 2HORM 00 1H12 brV WVJ, ISE2nr1 IV1 OCCV2IO 2n9DIN12IOIA ,; IHE NAILED CIJK OL THE NrrVCE OL KGUKNrrE' KEV1DVrr COMMIX: IrrIV1012' iHEVICE 20niH 21DEV10E 015 LVCIr11J VIEWS V2 CCIVA 1 BETS -----------------I" IHE OLLICE OL IHE iHE16E0Hl IV1DICtl1ED VIVIE OL W VA MH 90VD MI1H THE 2001" rIVIE OL EV21 WVIVi 2115EEE 142 2HOMV1 OV1 IHE 61141 OL „MOODMOISIH IVIDICVIED 9K 14 SOVIIM, IViDICV10J5 - V- 1 015 14C 2bECIVr WD L016E001VIC brvi OL 2n9DIN210H VVID HESE9K MSVII12 112 W016levo SECOSDED 12 DE2C1518ED HEFSEIVI' HElSEBI CO EVA12 10 1HE EXEMLO" VV1D 15ECOKDIVIC OL 1HE VBONE VV1D DOE2 HElSEBA tlCKV10MrEDCE 11VID 11D061 IHE 2tlWE nooF IHE 2JKVF VV1D lilrl bI51ViC1614r WE151DIVVI DE2C151BED 142 tarrOM2 COWWEVICIVIC Vi IHE 6011411 OL IVIlE152EC110V1 OL IHA CEV11A15 COV COnV2 bV\VK 114 1"141 206601512 OVAL IVIDn21251 0I O - HOrDEK aL tl WOIII( tlVH OVA IHE b1606E1611 br1111ED tl2 2HOM" BX IHE bVV1 Log IHE n2E2 VVID bnKbo2E2 142 IV1DICtliED iHEKOV DV1ED VI OKKNrrE' IrrIV012 1HI2 D111 0E 5013' 1HV1 6'1161 Ot IHE VIOUIHEV21 On MFU OIL 2EC110V1 '3'3' i0MV12Hlb 3� VIOl51H' ISVVICE S' EV21 OL IHE MUD COVI1MnE2 10 61141 IVI 2HtlbIV1C IHE ECONOWIC / IVBIr11J OL OH IHE V11tlCHED 61'11 VV1D HV!\E CVn2ED 1HE 2VWE 10 BE 2nKf\EJ.ED 2nBDINDED 'M Vegicnrinm VVID 15E2bEC12 IRE JSOVF 1"141 LVISWIVIC COMAiK OL ^� ` 1"12 12 10 ClUBI: K 1-1111 THE OViDE15 INED V16A IHE OMVIE152 oL THE b150bEF511 DE2C161BE( OU IH ED onIgEDEWEVi12' DE2CISIBED b150bFgIK- KEVIDVrr COWL)\ HV2 V VOVIC' 151CH Il5VD1110V1 IVJ ` ) zz OO IHE E` DO ED FB)\ CF11EE Corr I IVAF HV2 BEEVi bgO EV Lou IHE C sEw 1"21 OL Vrr THE 15A0nE21 OL IHE OMVEIS(2) 1HEKEOL' HV /\E 2n15NEKED' 2nBDINIDED VViD InNil D THE LOVrOMIV1C V10110E 21141E OL -- ----- ) canHU OL KEV1DVr ) ) 22 xII ----- _D_o_H_E_K_E_B_A_C_EFL_llt_X_1_H_tl_1_ 1H_-----FLED IW6150 EWEV112 HV �E BEEVI IV121tlrrED 1 -' CIU EVIemug Los IHE nwim CIIJ, OL 1H12 12 10 CP6DL1` 1HV1 1' WICHAr C" EVI2Vr14C0' TVIVlal2 bUOLA2210VIVr NVID 2n1SNELOU VIO" 32-5 \88' 141 KEVIDVrr CONAIK UICHI 10 LV15W 21141EVA 1401 W0161C'10EE,2 CE1611LICtliE 21tl1E OL Irrouz ) COnHl>, OL KEV1Dtlrr ) COnVlll, OL KEV1DVrr OMVIA152HIb CEUBUCV1E 22 ) 22 nul,Feq CIFX of Xot;c,vp6 bnwb DFo F!ou 001 E o�nslQ 21141E OL IrrIV1012 ) 21141E OL IrrIV1012 ) nuwcoibo aFsq b_S Cus-EswgX pszlgsucs tSErOC11110V OL LVCIrI11EZ Mlrr BE DOV1E BX CESWIFFZ 141 CO21 OL. IHE CISwiOl \r01 OMHA16' nbw M16111EV1 16EonE21 2n15NE1015,2 CE1511LICVIE puznpq!nl_geq OS 2115nC1n1SE2 2nCH 112 tl boar' BFIEVI110V1 bOViD 015 WECHVViICVr EonIbWEVi1 2n16LVCED MI1H IV11E161015 D161NEMVX2 VV1D MrKMVX2' Bni EXCMDE2 ISEVr bgObE151A bH1.21CVrr ,l OccnbIFD BJ, V BNVDIVIC' 2EKNCE en2ME22 DI21161 ILA EVICIVEEl5,2 CESI1LICtl1E 6O\ Ol s b a 6 0 2 ou ZOWWOVI C15onViDu bVKKMC: tlVID ZOAM" 1116Eq IHE 1EgM ZOWWOVi V15E'1 09 V16A'12u VViD ,COWWO" EfEwEVl12, MCMDE 16E'1r b15abEg 1 1 1p 11t 9 14 {ps boobs fX In Q �° fi3 ,s8 „ lA � a8 43 , EADA 1HOne" 2nCH VWK BE OIHEFSMI2E DE21CHtl1ED OV1 IHE 6141 B> 1E16W2 2nCH 142 „0011012: ,COWWOVI EfEWEV112: ObEH1 2bVCE; .ObEVI VISE CI (� M111 MOIn6 26M6L ouq Ma1st, CODU6C(IOU _______ CILI VDWIW21KV10F5 xat-PMG r!oua Clnp ga16q via)\ ld' 5002 Ip6 122' 2e , Jee" d1 , J0, b n `KY 12e' 8e , I MHICH 12 gAHUNED IVi MHOrE 015 142 tlV1 '1bbOK110IMI" 1 10 IHE 2AbV16tlIErJ, OWED 1012' b49CEr2 OK tl16EV2 MIiHIV1 IHE InNIAVIED DENErObWEI ----------------------------- IHE ININ ,COWWOVI tl16E'1 OK vg1lQ, 12 DEUV1ED 142 tl 101 bVISCEr OK VKV OL IHE 16Etlr b150bFgl); IHE BEVIELICItlr n2E VV1D [MOI,WEV11 p6(M66U fps C!4 0� �olKngls auq fps � - - r- - } � � - � E!02\S' 142 11WEVIDED LFSOW 11WE 10 11WE' S) bs 1ps iswboua ? Eaz61usu1 ydl6slusuf I I I 1HE lEKW COWWOVi EfEWEVi12, 2Htlrr Htlf\E 1HE WEVViIHC 2E1 tOF51H Log 2nCH IFgIN M IHE Zo "DOWMInw bgObFgiX tlCi; CHtlb1EK \Q2 Ir 00 THE b160bF9 abFIWIIO" VV1D WVIVA1FV1VVICE iHEKEOL' abblonsq 1lual sud.01 C ua wo� VLLEK M2ltlrrtlilOVl OL wx 2nCH LtlCIrIl1E2 1HE Og'gDE OL IHE 2OBDINIDED bKobEI511. 2H11rr V10i BE VVIDAED IH V WVViViEK 20 142 10 IV11EULA16E MI nV111ED CIlA OL l.OFSKNrrE' IrfIV1012' 1HIZ --`---Dtl1, OE--__------' SOJ '3' zpon19 ps !u d6usl.al coulolwoucs MI (p {ps I I `o" I I � ,E112EWEVi1: .Jlllr111. E'12EWEV11= SnB11C 0111111. Etl2EWEV11; .b'n'E" u (o\ z!wLlal, gsz!dua4!ou)' MIIHOnl IHE 61610FS M15111EV1 COH2EH11 OL IHE C16VV11EF lzznaucs oV a pnpq!ua bslw!f Ips 2gG blou I 20 gmlq!ua r!us I I 20 Bnllg!ua r!us 20, Bmlglua r!us �� CKtlV11EE2, LVC11I11E2 OFS IH' 060"1 015 ONES IHE bF506E151> MIIHIVt IHE Dtl2HED OFS DOLLED fME2 ou z!wlal sz!aua Lou 11bb160NED tlVD '1CCEblED Bl IHE CI11 VDWIV11211SV1016 OL IHE _ _ 1 } ( 1 9 A. ) 0" IHE 61141 VV1D WVKK abb onsq pl 11 6 C!4X Eudlussl buol to 1ps - - - I HEFSEIVI CI NEVI' VViD THE 161CHI 10 EVIlEK nbo" IHE 2nBDINDED bKObEKK LOU tlrr 2nCH bnKbo2EZ" OB21KnC110V12 2Htlrr VIOL BE brtlCED ON 6 zn Wl s Ol sac !u Inl na o au 2, b n' �D' 160012' 2'1brMeZ VV1D 10 C1EVK OB21KnC110V12 L90W IHE 2n16LVCE VV1D 2nB2ngLVCE VZ W'11 BE 16E'120V1tlBr1 16EOf1116ED IHICIDEVl1 10 IHE SIGH conHi>, oL KEHDtlrr ) P P 44 9 ! P 9. .9 I lot q I � 2, b' n �0 '--� �' o +� 22 J) y z!udls lo{ z!1s blau M!p ps dn!lsq 4o I I I "a- VKEV2 10 2EKNA MbKO1\EWE1Al2 1HEKEOW 016 014 'VD1VCEViI 1012' VViD COWWOH VFSEtl 05 1415E'12' IHE 161CH1 10 Cn1 1161W Ol5 lSEWONE 116EE2' Bn2HE 21141E OL Ir11V1012 ) VIOlE2 10, b' nS�D' E' �- 2 b n' S�D' E" '- 2 b' n' �D' E o ? bnBrlC 016 bFLIN'1lE' lOCE1HEF5 MI1H IHE 151CH1 l0 IVi2111rr BEOnIKED ZEKNCE COViV1EC110V12 oVIDE16 IHE 2n&WE OL EVCH r01 IGID COMIC" 14�SEV b160b1gIX DFM"VIED OVl 1HE brVi VZ oCOWWOVI VbFV 015 tlKEV2: VVID IHE b160bEblk DE2(CV1tl1ED 014 IHE brtll L016 2116EE12 VV1D WVFX2' MHE1H( I I o z!wpo gsz!aua41ou)` 1HE bKobFgIX DE22"VIED IVi 1HE DECN16V110V1 OL COVIDOWIV11nW tlV1D\015 a" 1HI2 brV1 qZ „COWWOHI EIEWEV112. 11VD 1F Clll tlDWIV12115Vi0F5,2 CEFSlILICtllE DV2HED 016 DOLLED rIV1E2 (ot z!wpal gszldua41ou `i co So I I I I ) OV1 IHE br'11 tlHD WV16KED .E112EWEV1: nilrllA Etl2EWEV1: .bnBrlC nilrlll. E112EWEH1= 6' n"E' u EfEC1151C1I1 COWWnV11CV110112' 20nVD2 tlVD 21CVIVr2 IVI' ONEIS' nVDEK' VCgO22' WOVO WD nbOV1 IHE Zn16LVCE OL IHE bF50bEF511 2HOMH MIIHIVi 1F ` IKVIAZL016WEK2' bEDE2111r2' EOOkbWEV11 C'1BIVIEI2 OLS 01HEg LVCIr111E2 n2ED IVI COViVIEC1100 WiVA n01DFUNOOVID 1KVV12W12210V1 VViD DI21161Bn110V 0 o o o O ° - CUK C1EKK ° H I _ 16ECOV1 9 0 I-IFIK 16A2bECLNE rICEVi2EE2 012 IIOIvIlrl\ gVID 2E!\EKWI- x 10 C0021Knc ObEFS'11E FSE ci --------------------------------------------- ° 2nCCE220162 VV1D V221C � 2116nC1 16Ebr'10E 2nbbrEWEV11 FSErOCtl1E tlV1D FSEWONE' LISOW 11WE 10 11WE' bOrE2' CnA2' VVICHOF52' M115E2' CVBfE2' COV1Dfll12' WVV1H01E o y btll(S Wtl1V11tlIV1' WODIF C/j C/j ti zonFp pus loF 3 yn c� = I rU P T = ru N Uj IocoFsq X2 �ssF zonFp of Fps I I I COWWOHME11r1H AD120H COWb'1141); VWEKIlECH 1111141 0 1 2 a'K'a' IVVIVIC12 BErf 1E1A6HOVIE COWbtlV1J: C16tlH1EE2' m C10 .L`u 1 ) al Uj I I9 10 �c�s2 � � m 'Jdnu!c!b,�Ipbnycbs ZFapcu I I � N ° 12 HEISEBI 16E2ESNED LOU tlVID CKtlVIlED 10 c U 00 y ) ( I o s tlHD 01HEK bKabEKix MI1H E1ECIKIC 11ViD COWWnVlICV110V1 2E16NCE ° r G o I °� 111410141-EXCfn21NE E'12EWEVi1 LOU 2FgAIVIC IHE 2nBDIN1210V1 Dtl >, OE_---------' 5023" N � �OFSKNrrE' IrrIV1012' Bl, OlSDIVIVVICE Ho"-----------------' tl1 tl WEE11V1C HE1D 1HI2 o I � -I � � co tlbb160NED tlVID '1CCAb1ED Bl IHE WV1OlS tlVD CI1> COn141Clr OE IHE nV111ED CIl> OL I c I uj `o E'12EWEV11 bI50N210H2 Can1411 OL KE1D'11 ) ° 16EWONE tlrr EXCE22 DE91612 VVID 2balr' vIAD 10 rENE IHE WtlIH1EH11VICE V16Etl I" %v CEvIE5tlrr , C1EVV VVID M016Ktl"FlYI: COD110V22 21141E OL IrrIH1012 ) � .; I I I I I � ° MOKK' 10 BVCKLIrr vviD WonVID Vrr 1KEVICH CFSEVIED 20 142 10 16E1VIV1 20111481E DKVI",gcC 10 COVD bgiCH VVIX 112bH1qr1 OLS COVICSElE 2nKL'1C ' CIIK CfE5K,2 CE16lILIC11lE � s I I I I x b'1NEWEVII CnKB' Cn11E152' 116EE2' fVMV 015 2H16nBBE151 bLSONDED' HOMENEK' iHtl1 2VID Cilk ZHVrr BE OgVJCV1ED' LOrrOMIV1C 2nCH W11MIEVVVIC II 2Htlrr HtlNE V10 OBrICV110V1 MI1H 16E26EC1 to 2nKLVCE 1SE21015111100' MCrnDMC Bnl 14101 11WIlED 10' IHE 15E21015tl110H' 16EbV15 015 FSEbfVCEWEVIl 0 n I I I I I o � o L01rOMIViC 11Hl MOESK 10 BE 6EJSLOISWED 81 IHE nV111ED Clll OE 1016KNfrE IV1 IHE EXE16CIZE OL 112 Etl2EWEV11 KICH2 HEUD" CKVViIED' ZVM CIL o V111WED EVI1111E2 2H'111 C'1n2E '1141), CHtlVICE IV1 eg'gDE 015 IWbVIFS 015 CH11VICE IHE 2n15LVCE D16VIMCE bVIlEUVi2' WtlK016 - - - O ti Vbbn151 0'q - I I I I E H1 1HEgU0 EX1211V1C MI1H1" 'HE E'12EWE012 BEIVIC CKO22ED OK KEC15022ED' 00 n2E 09 OcCnbuDovI oL 2tlID Etl2EWEHI B IHE VBON j d0, Bnllg!ua r!us d0, Bn!19Na f!us DOV1E IH WCH V n1mviE16 20 v2 ViOL 10 IVilE15LEUA MI1H' DVWVCE' OK D12inU9 VH ilS11V2W12210H1 VVAD DIZiKIBnmo 21.21EW2 tlVD LVCIrI11E O ✓ Bn!Igiu r, - I EVIB E2 2" lOHEtlVIM I OL. AVVIVIEXC1n2V2 VI IHE C iEgLIC VMI 16OU bg CI1 OE 2111D CCnbV OVI VI IHE '4901T-A9A VitlWED EV1 9 EV 2HErr OI + - - - _ ue I I I IHE 1 2 2"'111 BE DOME I 142 1401 10 IHIEKLE16E MI1H OK bISECrnDE IHE OCCnbV110H VVD 02E iHEKEOL B1 O1HEK E1411111E2 LOI � E. - - INE EV2EWEVII HEKEIVi CIS'1V11ED VV1D KE2A16NED Log 1HE VBONE WIVAM EVILLE2 B1, EVCH OL 2N) Vbb9ONFD IrID VC' 1HI2 916 LrAF -DV1, IS---- COMA' SOJ3' d (SS \ ad,) 1222e 10, b' n onD'E' 2e d3 r= J JO ' Od I W n2E2 HEgUV1 DE2CgIBED' Vbb160NED tlHD VCCEb1ED B IHE W11105 VVD CII> CanVC11 OL IHE nV11ED CI11 OL , } �_ / Jo �= BE n2ED LOK CVKDEVI2' 2HKnK2 1KEE2' rVV1D2C11bIV1C' DFSINEMtl12' tlVD O1HEF5 KErV1ED bn15b02E2 1"141 DO HI01 nV5Etl20V1tlBfJ IH1E15LEFSE MI1H 1H( COnV111 OL KEVDtl1r ) J J Q �°�3 ,SQ „ E STS' 00 , } E-1082 8Q r= Jd� a� O OB21KnC110V2 2"1411 BE COH21ISnC1ED IVI' 060141' OS ONES tlHl V16Etl2 DE21CVtllED '12 .bnBrlC nllflll 4 D15tlIHVCE EV2EWEVII: Bn1 20CH tlKEV2 Wtl , 22 COUJUJGuclut B6�IIJIIIUPci 1ps 2onFq pus ok EnzF VIo!u 2F\ssF T=S2 � �7 , Z O' OTU O C'��= ��Q �Q , CB -vj QO O Off _ nVIDEKClSOnVID 1FSVV12WI2210V1 VVID D121KIBn110V1 2K21EW2 tlHD LVCIfI11E2 tlbbnK1E141tlV11 1HEKE10' 1410 bE16WtlV1A1411 BfIIfDIHC2' 21KnC1n15E2' 01 Z111iE OL Irrou2 ) bo l.u � Oq b Hs s4oZo s psq!caFsq Co �!dpF °� � , 3i „ E Q�°. Q MHICH M1E16LE16E MI1H IHE COV121FSnC110V1' IVi214rr1q1(OVi' SECOV12116nC110H' ISE6VIK' ISEWONVr' 15EbrVCEWEVl1 WVMIE0VVICE gVID ObEFS'1110H OL 1HEIF �7 T T�j T � � prr T lSICHi 10 Cnl I51W' 015 KEWONE '11411 1FSEE2' 2HFSn82 OK O1HEK bN012 MIL-11" IHE V15E112 DEIMVIVIED V2 ..bnBrlC MIr111, VVID DKtlIoveE EV2EWE1411 Clix COnVICIr CLgDLIC'11E T42, Z y NRAA 241W L+ ,ul, Cx � � � IHE '1BONE VVWED EV11111E2 V16E HEKEBx eggV11ED IHE KICH1 10 F CIE nbOO EV2EWEV112 HE(SEIVi DE2CISIBED 5016 IHE n2E2 HEJSEIVi 2E1 LO151H tlV1D IM KWE J „ = ao, =3 1HEISEI0 Log 1HE bE152OV1ViEr WD EOMMEVil OECE22VI K VV1D 15Eon116ED Log 20CH n2E2 WD b17IKbO2E2' 2AME162 VV1D E1EC%ICIII: MIIH10 IHE V16EV2 2HOM0 OVi IHE 6rtl1 142 .bnBflC (WnlA D15VIVIVCE E112EWEHl: lOCE1HE15 MI1H tl FLICHI OL tlCCE2 _____ CHtlISWVH 16ECOV1Z116nC1 KEbtl115' 16EWONE' KEbr110E VV1D M2bEC1 LVCMbEZ Log WE 116'1V12w12210V1 VViD D121gS9r) oo OL M1EI5' 210KW ZEME152' 211VII111K1 -------------- d0, 0 v0, SO, tl VOV -EXCrn21NE EVHVIEViI 12 '1120 HA16E8,1 "FHI: NED L09 VVID egVVilED 10 IHE nV11ED CIl OE JOISKNIrfE' IrrIV012 10 COV21FSnC1 11412114// poi rKN rE' iomo2Hlb OE BIS12iu' KE ywD Conn , I� � Iou Vol 10 2EKNE IVdbKONEWEV112 1HE(SEOV' 2 8a .dBGQIl E �' Ed21 OE IHE 1H1�'jD bI51V1Clbd � WEISIDIdI� IVl IHE (1V�IlED CIl� OE 16EOn115ED LOK 2nCH 02E2 WD b0"b02E2 1100 lOCE1HE16 MI1H IHE KICHl 10 IV121Vrr 16EOnIKED 2EKNCE COViV1ECLOV12 MIDE16 IHE 2nKL110E OL EVC14 nOUED MX OL LOKKNrrE' IrrIV1012' 1"12 -------DVX 0E----------' SOJ3' V2zn usq gsouua o1 tlrf Vic ninik Lz Dg IVIq Vbbn51E141VV11 1HE16E10' 10CE1HE15 MIIH IHE FSICHI OL VCCE2Z 1HESE10 505 IHE bE1620V14Ar tlVD EOnIbVJEVIl HECE22tl151 VVC V10E'j1HEd21 Of1dE51Ed OE 2EClI0V1 33 lOMV12Hlb 3 � V10�' 1H ISdV10E bnBrlC 0111111 4 D15VIVVCE Etl2EWEV11u, 10CMDIVID MI1HOn1 rIWIiV110V1 10 lEfEbH014E CV81E' C'12 WtlIV2' EfEC115IC rIHE2' CV81E lE1EN210V1 rIVE2' tlVC '1bbKONED VVD tlCCEblED Bl IHE 6114141 COWW12210V OL IHE Eat( yla!u 211ss1 16EWONE' KAbr110E' IV12bEC1 WtlIV11VIVi VV1D abEl5V1E nVDEF5C50nVID 116VV12W12210V1 tlVD DI21151Bn110V1 2A21EW2 tlVD rIHE2 nVDE15 IHE 2nKLVCE OL IHE o '� Ip6 2on1p6yT g!ap1 of MaX r!us of BEIVIC d 2(1BDIN210V1 0� bdESl OE 1HE ME21 Hd � E Ob IHE tl{SE'12 2HOM141 oV 1HE 61141 112 ,bnBrlC 0111111 DStlIV1VCE EV2EWEVII. (aPPlsn!o{sq b' n" D"E") 10 COV12116nC1 IV121tlrr' SECOV2115nC1 SAbVl15 COnVlll OL KEHDVrr ) VViD HOrDEK2 OL EXI2DOC L16VViCHIZE2 C15VVilED B,l IHE Clll OL 1016KNrrE' IrrIV1012' VV1D IHEI16 KEZbEC11NE Zf1CCE22052 tlHD V221CV12 MIIHIVI IHE '6 \1 -VEK 2 RB-DIL12101/� U-I 110141 j2 b 0 0 1 tl HOV -EXCrn21NE EV2EWEV11 12 HE15EBX 15EKU1 ED LN VV1D C15VV11ED 10 29C VWE1611ECH' V11C015' COW ED' `iOVIE2 IVIlELSCVB( E' O1HEF5 bnBflC nInDEZ' 22 21111E OL IrnVla12 ) Bd212 0� BEdF51V02 L ' ^ r- L I bnBrlC nlVIL1 VVID D15VIV1110E Etl2EWEV11 CI II` 6114141 COWW12210141 CEISlILICtliE CI ✓ I�I o �1 E142EWEV11 bKON210H2 NAILED Cak OL XOgKNIrrE A. Co. Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 440 Legal ❑ Mayor#3 Finance ■ EST. 1836 Engineer ■ ~�= City Administrator ■ Tracking Number 1' Human Resources ❑ '$ �v Community Development : CC 2013-12 Police ELE ��"� Public Works ■ Parks and Recreation ■ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Proposed FY 2013-2014 Budget Meeting and Date: City Council—March 26, 2013 Synopsis: Discussion of proposed budget. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Q Memorandum �` To: City Council Esr. 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: March 20, 2013 NcrAil Cc.city ALE ►�-�' Subject: FY 14 budget Summary Review of FY 14 budget discussion, recommended changes to budget proposal, and approval of the FY 14 budget. Background This item was last discussed at the March 12th City Council meeting. At that meeting, the City Council held a public hearing on the FY 14 budget proposal and discussed different policy questions throughout the budget. Finance Director Fredrickson has attached a list of all the changes discussed by City Council at that meeting, as well as a few more staff is recommending. Budget adjustments Adjustment#1 The budget proposal showed various levels of fund balance for this fund in FY 16 through FY 18. Since the Debt Service Fund is a non-operating fund and does not require a reserve, interfund transfers from the General Fund have been adjusted in order to maintain a projected zero fund balance position in FY 2016 - 2018. Adjustment#2 The amounts listed in the budget proposal for these line-items were incorrect(clerical error). The figures listed in this adjustment are correct according to the FY 11 audit. Adjustment#3 The turn lanes on East and West Countryside Parkway near Route 47 have faded, and need to be repainted. This is a deceptively expensive project, and not one that we can fit without our current budget. Thus, the $16,000 expense in MFT will be used to repaint the turn-lanes. This project will be completed very soon after the start of the fiscal year. Adjustment#4 This proposed change involves two factors. For ease of understanding, we included them within the same recommended change, rather than try to show the dollar amounts of each. The first factor is our actual FY 14 health insurance charges, assuming the City Council adopts the plan as recommended by staff at the Administration Committee meeting on March 21 st. For this factor, the aggregate budget total for health insurance will go up from FY 13 to FY 14 by 15%, instead of our original budget amount of 10%. We had originally estimated 10% increases in dental, vision and life insurance, but those figures have come back at 1.4% increase, 0%, and 11.1% decrease, respectively. Thus, all categories costs for FY 15 through FY 18 are based off of these new FY 14 figures. Generally, we have assumed 10% increases in FY 15 and FY 16, and 6% increases in FY 17 and FY 18. The second factor in this change involves dropping our proposal narrated in the budget proposal memo as "Items to note—raises and health insurance contributions". The concept of giving all employees a 2%net raise, which actually consists of a 5% gross raise and higher health insurance contributions, was difficult to explain to employees and would have been tough to administer. It would have to be negotiated into union contracts, even though there was no net impact for the City for current employees, and no impact on current employees. Ultimately, we decided it was too much of a hassle for too little of an impact, when we can have the same impact through a simple two-tiered benefit plan in the future. Thus, we have revised health insurance and salary numbers to reflect a straight 2% salary increase for employees, with no increase in health insurance contribution percentages. Adjustment#5 KenCom sent the City a $22,000 for intergovernmental agreement cost sharing at the end of January. This payment was in conflict with the last KenCom agreement actually approved by the City Council in October 2011. That agreement contemplated no City payments until FY 15, and was the agreement we used to prepare the budget. After we received the invoice from KenCom, we researched the intergovernmental agreement further, we found that the settlement agreement as part of the KenCom intergovernmental agreement litigation reverted to the agreement approved by everyone in November 2010 (except with a higher Kendall County contribution to KenCom). That November 2010 agreement required the cities to make partial contributions into KenCom in FY 13 and FY 14. Thus, we have amended our FY 13 projected budget and FY 14 proposed budget to include the KenCom payment of $22,000, and include payment of a $3,500 invoice for use of the Everbridge emergency notification system in FY 14. That system was approved by the KenCom Executive Board in February 2013. Adjustment#6 This group of changes reflects the discussion from the March 12th City Council meeting. We have reinstated KAT funding and leaf pickup services throughout the five year budget proposal. Proposals for the senior garbage subsidy are included in adjustment#8 below. Adjustment#7 This group of changes is narrated in the agenda item on infrastructure costs, which was discussed at the March Public Works meeting. It assumes the City Council adopts the five-year Road to Better Roads program recommended by staff. To note, these budget numbers make no assumption as to how the FY 15 through FY 18 water, sewer, sidewalk, and storm sewer projects associated with the roadway projects will be funded. Rather, it simply lists the costs associated with five-year project. Adjustment#8 The specific proposal for the senior garbage subsidy parameters is outlined below. From a conservative budgeting perspective, we recommend that the City include the full cost of the senior garbage subsidy in FY 14 ($140,000) and $75,000 per year for the senior garbage subsidy for FY 15 through FY 18. The discussion at the last City Council meeting about a needs-based or tiered system of senior garbage discounts will likely cost the City less than the recommended $75,000 per year budget amount. However, it is difficult to estimate how many seniors will qualify for a needs-based or tiered level that the City Council has not approved yet—which is why we are recommending a high budget figure. Our recommendation for the senior garbage subsidy is to keep the verification process as simple as possible. Currently, the discount is given with the simple photocopy of a driver's license and proof of residency at an address (driver's license, utility bills, etc.). As mentioned at the last meeting, the state's circuit breaker program has an age requirement that matches ours (65) and established income guidelines at $27,000 for an individual, $36,000 for a couple, and $45,000 for a three person household. Senior Services Associates helps individuals register for the circuit breaker program, and could easily verify whether an individual applying for a senior garbage discount qualified for the circuit breaker program. Upon verification of eligibility, the City could award the senior garbage discount to an individual. Another program we looked at,but ultimately recommend against, is the senior citizen's assessment freeze. This program is administered by the County Assessor, and is eligible for seniors over 65 years old whose household income is under$55,000 per year. The application for this assessment freeze is attached, and relies on answers regarding the amount of social security benefits, civil service benefits, interest and dividends received, capital gains and losses, and other income-tax specific information. Additionally, it could be easily verified through either the County Assessor's office, or by simply accessing someone's property tax information on the County website. However, individuals who were renting homes are not eligible for the program. The 2010 decennial census showed that nearly 20% of all the dwelling units in the City are renter occupied. While that number would contain a large number of apartments and condos (which have their own private trash services), we didn't think it was fair to have different standards for a senior who owned a home and a senior who was renting a home from someone else. Finally, creating an income verification process similar to the assessment freeze for all seniors (whether they owned a home or rented) seemed needlessly complex for both the individual and the City, compared to the value of the senior garbage discount. However, if the City Council would like us to create a similar income verification process, we would model it off of the senior citizen's assessment freeze application. We could not find any other existing senior citizen program administered at the county, state, or federal level which had similar eligibility requirements, let alone one that could be easily verified by the City. Our new recommendation for the senior garbage subsidy is to continue in its current amount in FY 14, and then implement a needs based system through verification of circuit breaker enrollment in FY 15 through FY 18. While the dollar amount of the discount is up for debate,we would recommend that seniors who qualify be given a 75% discount on monthly garbage services. At the current cost to the City of$17.61 per month, the 75% discount would result in a$4.40 cost to the senior. Pursuant to our original recommendation to eliminate the subsidy entirely, we propose no discount for seniors who do not meet the circuit breaker eligibility requirements. However,the City Council could choose to approve any discount level for non-circuit breaker account. As a reminder, the current cost of providing garbage services to all accounts in the City is $17.61 per month per account. Seniors, over the age of 65, currently pay$0.50 per month for garbage service. All other residents are charged the full cost of the service. We currently have—650 senior garbage accounts in the City. Questions unanswered from last meeting At the last meeting, Alderwoman Spears posed questions on two line-items within the water fund. Those questions and answers are as follows: Question 1 Why is Treatment Facility Services, line-item 51-510-54-00-5445, at $100,000 budgeted for FY 13 through FY 18, when we spent $65,000 in FY 11 and $85,000 in FY 12? Answer: FY 13 was the first year that this line-item existed in the budget. Prior to that, we had around $250,000 contained within a line-item for treatment facility supplies. We felt that large line-item was not descriptive enough, as it contained both treatment facility supplies (physical materials) and treatment facility services (contractual services with vendors). So, we created those two line-items out of the one larger line-item in FY 13 and did our best to estimate the breakout of expenses between the two. That breakout ended up being $100,000 to the supplies line-item and $165,000 to the services line- item. We based our FY 14 budget proposal off of those numbers from FY 13. When we went back to analyze the past expenses of FY 11 and FY 12, the breakout between the two line-items ended up being slightly different. Question 2 Why is equipment, line-item 51-510-60-00-6060, going from $0 in FY 12 to $16,000 in FY 13, to $10,000 in FY 14? Answer: This line-item contains expenses for new radio-read water meters. All new homes are equipped with a radio-read water meter, but many of our older homes have manual-read water meters. In an effort to cut down on water meter reading costs in the future, we proposed this line-item to include money to purchase radio-read water meters and replace them on older homes as those manual-read water meters are retired. Recommendation Staff recommends the above budget adjustments. If the City Council agrees with the attached figures,we will draft an ordinance and motion for the next City Council meeting incorporating these adjustments. Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes Budget AginjIMgHLLI FY 2016 General Admin Srvcs 01-640-99-00-9942 Transfer to Debt Service 26,386 (26,386) FY 2016 Debt Service Revenue 42-000-49-00-4901 Transfer from General - 26,386 26,386 FY 2017 General Admin Srvcs 01-640-99-00-9942 Transfer to Debt Service 82,372 125,232 (42,860) Debt service interfund adjustment for 2005A bond FY 2017 Debt Service Revenue 42-000-49-00-4901 Transfer from General 82,372 125,232 42,860 payments FY 2018 General Admin Srvcs 01-640-99-00-9942 Transfer to Debt Service 335,254 205,852 129,402 FY 2018 Debt Service Revenue 42-000-49-00-4901 Transfer from General 335,254 205,852 (129,402) Net Effect on Fund Balance Budget AgiH21MgHLhL2 FY 2011 Actual Land Cash Land Cash 72-720-60-00-6038 Wheaton Woods Nature Trail 213 2,133 n/a Informational only FY 2011 Actual Rec Ctr Rec Ctr 80-800-54-00-5440 Telecommunications 4,349 4,379 n/a Budget FY 2014 Motor Fuel Tax Motor Fuel Tax 15-155-54-00-5495 Outside Repair&Maintenance - 16,000 (16,000) Countryside striping project FY 2017 General Admin Services 01-640-99-00-9923 Transfer to City-Wide Capital 1,798,213 1,117,994 680,219 Interfund transfer adjustments in FY 2017 to zero FY 2017 City-Wide Capital City-Wide Capital 23-000-49-00-4901 Transfer from General 1,798,213 1,117,994 (680,219) out fund balance in the City-Wide Capital fund FY 2018 General Admin Services 01-640-99-00-9923 Transfer to City-Wide Capital 643,477 300,890 342,587 FY 2018 Motor Fuel Tax Motor Fuel Tax 15-155-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program 120,022 104,022 16,000 Interfund transfer adjustments in FY 2018 to zero out fund balance in the Motor Fuel Tax and City- FY 2018 City-Wide Capital City-Wide Capital 23-000-49-00-4901 Transfer from General 643,477 300,890 (342,587) Wide Capital funds FY 2018 City-Wide Capital City-Wide Capital 23-230-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program 879,978 537,391 342,587 Net Effect on Fund Balance 342,587 1 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes Budget i FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-50-00-5007 Salaries-Administration 268,745 264,599 4,146 FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 38,584 38,125 459 FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 27,404 27,087 317 FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 68,313 78,075 (9,762) FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 500 476 24 FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 6,059 5,628 431 FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 649 590 59 FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5235 E/O-Group Health Insurance 89,956 94,874 (4,918) FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5236 E/O-Group Life Insurance 700 682 18 FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5237 E/O-Dental Insurance 7,221 6,765 456 FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5238 E/O-Vision Insurance 775 703 72 FY 2014 General Finance 01-120-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 186,852 189,024 (2,172) FY 2014 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 20,708 20,742 (34) FY 2014 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 14,143 14,166 (23) FY 2014 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 23,655 25,822 (2,167) FY 2014 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 370 357 13 FY 2014 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 3,367 3,160 207 FY 2014 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 360 324 36 FY 2014 General Police 01-210-50-00-5008 Salaries-Police Officers 1,404,518 1,393,000 11,518 FY 2014 General Police 01-210-50-00-5011 Salaries-Chief&Deputies 305,000 299,674 5,326 FY 2014 General Police 01-210-50-00-5012 Salaries-Sergeants 439,849 435,746 4,103 FY 2014 General Police 01-210-50-00-5013 Salaries-Police Clerks 129,330 122,627 6,703 Salary,benefit and insurance revisions based on FY 2014 General Police 01-210-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 14,333 13,590 743 renewal amounts received from City's insurance FY 2014 General Police 01-210-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 184,704 182,664 2,040 broker FY 2014 General Police 01-210-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 478,421 536,837 (58,416) FY 2014 General Police 01-210-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 3,550 3,498 52 FY 2014 General Police 01-210-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 42,090 39,163 2,927 FY 2014 General Police 01-210-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 4,395 3,996 399 FY 2014 General Comm Devlp 01-220-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 198,419 195,666 2,753 FY 2014 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 21,990 21,685 305 FY 2014 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 17,164 16,953 211 FY 2014 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 44,261 50,430 (6,169) FY 2014 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 350 325 25 FY 2014 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 3,853 3,605 248 FY 2014 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 425 379 46 FY 2014 General PW-Streets 01-410-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 317,505 312,962 4,543 FY 2014 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 36,851 36,347 504 2 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2014 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 24,857 24,510 347 FY 2014 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 82,000 94,362 (12,362) FY 2014 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 650 635 15 FY 2014 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 7,608 7,095 513 FY 2014 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 825 739 86 FY 2014 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5240 Retirees-Group Health Insurance 42,413 44,723 (2,310) FY 2014 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5241 Retirees-Dental Insurance - 1,333 (1,333) FY 2014 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5242 Retirees-Vision Insurance 160 (160) Net Effect on Fund Balance (50,181) FY 2014 Water Water Ops 51-510-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 334,131 327,697 6,434 FY 2014 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 38,361 37,648 713 FY 2014 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 25,769 25,277 492 Salary,benefit and insurance revisions based on FY 2014 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 90,661 102,854 (12,193) renewal amounts received from City's insurance FY 2014 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 750 722 28 broker FY 2014 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 6,166 6,599 (433) FY 2014 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 825 729 96 Net Effect on Fund Balance (4,863) FY 2014 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 190,000 187,544 2,456 FY 2014 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 21,500 21,007 493 FY 2014 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 14,500 14,200 300 Salary,benefit and insurance revisions based on FY 2014 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 51,500 43,154 8,346 renewal amounts received from City's insurance FY 2014 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 425 365 60 broker FY 2014 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 4,240 2,653 1,587 FY 2014 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 475 307 168 Net Effect on Fund Balance 13,410 FY 2014 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 434,602 427,948 6,654 FY 2014 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 48,498 47,761 737 FY 2014 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 34,000 33,487 513 FY 2014 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 111,307 126,575 (15,268) FY 2014 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 1,000 980 20 FY 2014 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 10,232 9,580 652 FY 2014 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 1,104 1,004 100 Salary,benefit and insurance revisions based on renewal amounts received from City's insurance FY 2014 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 245,067 240,745 4,322 broker 3 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Orieinal Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2014 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 27,300 26,714 586 FY 2014 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 25,000 24,216 784 FY 2014 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 67,943 75,911 (7,968) FY 2014 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 600 591 9 FY 2014 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 4,839 4,344 495 FY 2014 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 575 505 70 Net Effect on Fund Balance (8,294) FY 2014 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 90,838 94,116 (3,278) FY 2014 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 625 595 30 Salary,benefit and insurance revisions based on renewal amounts received from City's insurance FY 2014 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 6,545 5,926 619 broker FY 2014 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 725 643 82 Net Effect on Fund Balance (2,547) Aggregate Effect on FY 2014 Fund Balance (52,475) FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-50-00-5007 Salaries-Administration 268,745 264,599 4,146 FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 38,584 38,125 459 FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 27,404 27,087 317 FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 75,144 85,883 (10,739) FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 505 481 24 FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 6,665 6,191 474 FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 714 649 65 FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5235 E/O-Group Health Insurance 98,952 104,361 (5,409) FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5236 E/O-Group Life Insurance 707 689 18 FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5237 E/O-Dental Insurance 7,943 7,442 501 FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5238 E/O-Vision Insurance 853 773 80 FY 2015 General Finance 01-120-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 186,852 189,024 (2,172) FY 2015 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 20,708 20,742 (34) FY 2015 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 14,143 14,166 (23) FY 2015 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 26,021 28,404 (2,383) FY 2015 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 374 361 13 FY 2015 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 3,704 3,476 228 FY 2015 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 396 356 40 FY 2015 General Police 01-210-50-00-5008 Salaries-Police Officers 1,404,518 1,393,000 11,518 FY 2015 General Police 01-210-50-00-5011 Salaries-Chief&Deputies 305,000 299,674 5,326 FY 2015 General Police 01-210-50-00-5012 Salaries-Sergeants 439,849 435,746 4,103 4 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2015 General Police 01-210-50-00-5013 Salaries-Police Clerks 129,330 122,627 6,703 FY 2015 General Police 01-210-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 14,333 13,590 743 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2015 General Police 01-210-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 184,704 182,664 2,040 FY 2015 General Police 01-210-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 526,263 590,521 (64,258) FY 2015 General Police 01-210-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 3,586 3,533 53 FY 2015 General Police 01-210-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 46,299 43,079 3,220 FY 2015 General Police 01-210-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 4,835 4,396 439 FY 2015 General Comm Devlp 01-220-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 198,419 195,666 2,753 FY 2015 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 21,990 21,685 305 FY 2015 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 17,164 16,953 211 FY 2015 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 48,687 55,473 (6,786) FY 2015 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 354 328 26 FY 2015 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 4,239 3,966 273 FY 2015 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 468 417 51 FY 2015 General PW-Streets 01-410-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 317,505 312,962 4,543 FY 2015 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 36,851 36,347 504 FY 2015 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 24,857 24,510 347 FY 2015 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 90,200 103,798 (13,598) FY 2015 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 657 641 16 FY 2015 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 8,369 7,805 564 FY 2015 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 908 813 95 FY 2015 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5240 Retirees-Group Health Insurance 46,654 49,195 (2,541) FY 2015 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5241 Retirees-Dental Insurance - 1,466 (1,466) FY 2015 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5242 Retirees-Vision Insurance 176 (176) Net Effect on Fund Balance (59,387) FY 2015 Water Water Ops 51-510-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 334,131 327,697 6,434 FY 2015 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 38,361 37,648 713 FY 2015 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 25,769 25,277 492 FY 2015 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 99,727 113,139 (13,412) Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2015 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 758 729 29 FY 2015 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 6,783 7,259 (476) 5 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2015 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 908 802 106 Net Effect on Fund Balance (6,114) FY 2015 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 190,000 187,544 2,456 FY 2015 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 21,500 21,007 493 FY 2015 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 14,500 14,200 300 FY 2015 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 56,650 47,469 9,181 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2015 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 429 369 60 FY 2015 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 4,664 2,918 1,746 FY 2015 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 523 338 185 Net Effect on Fund Balance 14,421 FY 2015 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 434,602 427,948 6,654 FY 2015 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 48,498 47,761 737 FY 2015 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 34,000 33,487 513 FY 2015 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 122,438 139,233 (16,795) FY 2015 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 1,010 990 20 FY 2015 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 11,255 10,538 717 FY 2015 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 1,214 1,104 110 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 FY 2015 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 245,067 240,745 4,322 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2015 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 27,300 26,714 586 FY 2015 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 25,000 24,216 784 FY 2015 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 74,737 83,502 (8,765) FY 2015 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 606 597 9 FY 2015 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 5,323 4,778 545 FY 2015 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 633 556 77 Net Effect on Fund Balance (10,486) FY 2015 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 99,922 103,528 (3,606) FY 2015 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 631 601 30 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 FY 2015 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 7,200 6,519 681 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2015 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 798 707 91 Net Effect on Fund Balance (2,804) Aggregate Effect on FY 2015 Fund Balance (64,370) 6 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-50-00-5007 Salaries-Administration 268,745 264,599 4,146 FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 38,584 38,125 459 FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 27,404 27,087 317 FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 82,659 94,471 (1 1,812) FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 510 486 24 FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 7,331 6,810 521 FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 785 714 71 FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5235 E/O-Group Health Insurance 108,847 114,798 (5,951) FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5236 E/O-Group Life Insurance 714 696 18 FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5237 E/O-Dental Insurance 8,737 8,186 551 FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5238 E/O-Vision Insurance 938 851 87 FY 2016 General Finance 01-120-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 186,852 189,024 (2,172) FY 2016 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 20,708 20,742 (34) FY 2016 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 14,143 14,166 (23) FY 2016 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 28,623 31,245 (2,622) FY 2016 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 377 364 13 FY 2016 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 4,074 3,824 250 FY 2016 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 436 392 44 FY 2016 General Police 01-210-50-00-5008 Salaries-Police Officers 1,404,518 1,393,000 11,518 FY 2016 General Police 01-210-50-00-5011 Salaries-Chief&Deputies 305,000 299,674 5,326 FY 2016 General Police 01-210-50-00-5012 Salaries-Sergeants 439,849 435,746 4,103 FY 2016 General Police 01-210-50-00-5013 Salaries-Police Clerks 129,330 122,627 6,703 FY 2016 General Police 01-210-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 14,333 13,590 743 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2016 General Police 01-210-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 184,704 182,664 2,040 FY 2016 General Police 01-210-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 578,889 649,573 (70,684) FY 2016 General Police 01-210-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 3,621 3,568 53 FY 2016 General Police 01-210-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 50,929 47,387 3,542 FY 2016 General Police 01-210-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 5,318 4,835 483 FY 2016 General Comm Devlp 01-220-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 198,419 195,666 2,753 FY 2016 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 21,990 21,685 305 FY 2016 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 17,164 16,953 211 FY 2016 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 53,556 61,020 (7,464) FY 2016 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 357 332 25 FY 2016 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 4,663 4,362 301 FY 2016 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 514 459 55 FY 2016 General PW-Streets 01-410-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 317,505 312,962 4,543 FY 2016 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 36,851 36,347 504 7 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2016 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 24,857 24,510 347 FY 2016 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 99,220 114,178 (14,958) FY 2016 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 663 648 15 FY 2016 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 9,206 8,585 621 FY 2016 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 998 894 104 FY 2016 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5240 Retirees-Group Health Insurance 51,320 54,115 (2,795) FY 2016 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5241 Retirees-Dental Insurance - 1,613 (1,613) FY 2016 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5242 Retirees-Vision Insurance 194 (194) Net Effect on Fund Balance (69,526) FY 2016 Water Water Ops 51-510-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 334,131 327,697 6,434 FY 2016 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 38,361 37,648 713 FY 2016 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 25,769 25,277 492 FY 2016 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 109,700 124,453 (14,753) Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2016 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 765 737 28 FY 2016 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 7,461 7,985 (524) FY 2016 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 998 882 116 Net Effect on Fund Balance (7,494) FY 2016 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 190,000 187,544 2,456 FY 2016 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 21,500 21,007 493 FY 2016 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 14,500 14,200 300 FY 2016 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 62,315 52,216 10,099 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2016 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 434 372 62 FY 2016 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 5,130 3,210 1,920 FY 2016 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 575 371 204 Net Effect on Fund Balancc 15,534 FY 2016 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 434,602 427,948 6,654 FY 2016 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 48,498 47,761 737 FY 2016 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 34,000 33,487 513 FY 2016 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 134,681 153,156 (18,475) FY 2016 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 1,020 1,000 20 FY 2016 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 12,381 11,592 789 FY 2016 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 1,336 1,215 121 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 FY 2016 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 245,067 240,745 4,322 salary,benefit and insurance amounts 8 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Orieinal Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2016 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 27,300 26,714 586 FY 2016 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 25,000 24,216 784 FY 2016 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 82,211 91,852 (9,641) FY 2016 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 612 603 9 FY 2016 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 5,855 5,256 599 FY 2016 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 696 611 85 Net Effect on Fund Balance (12,897) FY 2016 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 109,914 113,880 (3,966) FY 2016 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 638 607 31 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 FY 2016 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 7,919 7,170 749 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2016 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 877 778 99 Net Effect on Fund Balance (3,087) Aggregate Effect on FY 2016 Fund Balance (77,470) FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-50-00-5007 Salaries-Administration 268,745 264,599 4,146 FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 38,584 38,125 459 FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 27,404 27,087 317 FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 87,618 100,139 (12,521) FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 515 490 25 FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 7,771 7,218 553 FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 832 757 75 FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5235 E/O-Group Health Insurance 115,378 121,685 (6,307) FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5236 E/O-Group Life Insurance 721 703 18 FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5237 E/O-Dental Insurance 9,262 8,677 585 FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5238 E/O-Vision Insurance 994 902 92 FY 2017 General Finance 01-120-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 186,852 189,024 (2,172) FY 2017 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 20,708 20,742 (34) FY 2017 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 14,143 14,166 (23) FY 2017 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 30,340 33,119 (2,779) FY 2017 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 381 368 13 FY 2017 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 4,319 4,053 266 FY 2017 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 462 416 46 FY 2017 General Police 01-210-50-00-5008 Salaries-Police Officers 1,404,518 1,393,000 11,518 FY 2017 General Police 01-210-50-00-5011 Salaries-Chief&Deputies 305,000 299,674 5,326 9 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2017 General Police 01-210-50-00-5012 Salaries-Sergeants 439,849 435,746 4,103 FY 2017 General Police 01-210-50-00-5013 Salaries-Police Clerks 129,330 122,627 6,703 FY 2017 General Police 01-210-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 14,333 13,590 743 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2017 General Police 01-210-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 184,704 182,664 2,040 FY 2017 General Police 01-210-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 613,623 688,547 (74,924) FY 2017 General Police 01-210-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 3,658 3,604 54 FY 2017 General Police 01-210-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 53,985 50,230 3,755 FY 2017 General Police 01-210-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 5,637 5,125 512 FY 2017 General Comm Devlp 01-220-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 198,419 195,666 2,753 FY 2017 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 21,990 21,685 305 FY 2017 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 17,164 16,953 211 FY 2017 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 56,769 64,682 (7,913) FY 2017 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 361 335 26 FY 2017 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 4,942 4,624 318 FY 2017 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 545 486 59 FY 2017 General PW-Streets 01-410-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 317,505 312,962 4,543 FY 2017 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 36,851 36,347 504 FY 2017 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 24,857 24,510 347 FY 2017 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 105,173 121,029 (15,856) FY 2017 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 670 654 16 FY 2017 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 9,758 9,100 658 FY 2017 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 1,058 948 110 FY 2017 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5240 Retirees-Group Health Insurance 54,399 37,362 17,037 FY 2017 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5241 Retirees-Dental Insurance - 1,000 (1,000) FY 2017 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5242 Retirees-Vision Insurance 100 (100) Net Effect on Fund Balance (55,393) FY 2017 Water Water Ops 51-510-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 334,131 327,697 6,434 FY 2017 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 38,361 37,648 713 FY 2017 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 25,769 25,277 492 FY 2017 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 116,282 131,921 (15,639) Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2017 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 773 744 29 FY 2017 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 7,909 8,464 (555) FY 2017 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 1,058 935 123 Net Effect on Fund Balance (8,403) FY 2017 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 190,000 187,544 2,456 10 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2017 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 21,500 21,007 493 FY 2017 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 14,500 14,200 300 FY 2017 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 66,054 55,349 10,705 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2017 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 438 376 62 FY 2017 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 5,438 3,403 2,035 FY 2017 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 609 394 215 Net Effect on Fund Balance 16,266 FY 2017 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 434,602 427,948 6,654 FY 2017 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 48,498 47,761 737 FY 2017 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 34,000 33,487 513 FY 2017 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 142,762 162,345 (19,583) FY 2017 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 1,030 1,010 20 FY 2017 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 13,124 12,287 837 FY 2017 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 1,416 1,288 128 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 FY 2017 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 245,067 240,745 4,322 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2017 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 27,300 26,714 586 FY 2017 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 25,000 24,216 784 FY 2017 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 87,144 97,363 (10,219) FY 2017 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 618 609 9 FY 2017 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 6,207 5,572 635 FY 2017 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 737 648 89 Net Effect on Fund Balance (14,488) FY 2017 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 116,509 120,713 (4,204) FY 2017 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 644 613 31 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 FY 2017 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 8,395 7,601 794 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2017 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 930 825 105 Net Effect on Fund Balance (3,274) Aggregate Effect on FY 2017 Fund Balance (65,292) FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-50-00-5007 Salaries-Administration 268,745 264,599 4,146 FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 38,584 38,125 459 FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 27,404 27,087 317 11 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 92,875 106,147 (13,272) FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 520 495 25 FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 8,238 7,652 586 FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 882 802 80 FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5235 E/O-Group Health Insurance 122,300 128,987 (6,687) FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5236 E/O-Group Life Insurance 728 710 18 FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5237 E/O-Dental Insurance 9,817 9,197 620 FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-52-00-5238 E/O-Vision Insurance 1,054 956 98 FY 2018 General Finance 01-120-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 186,852 189,024 (2,172) FY 2018 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 20,708 20,742 (34) FY 2018 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 14,143 14,166 (23) FY 2018 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 32,160 35,106 (2,946) FY 2018 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 385 371 14 FY 2018 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 4,578 4,296 282 FY 2018 General Finance 01-120-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 489 440 49 FY 2018 General Police 01-210-50-00-5008 Salaries-Police Officers 1,404,518 1,393,000 11,518 FY 2018 General Police 01-210-50-00-5011 Salaries-Chief&Deputies 305,000 299,674 5,326 FY 2018 General Police 01-210-50-00-5012 Salaries-Sergeants 439,849 435,746 4,103 FY 2018 General Police 01-210-50-00-5013 Salaries-Police Clerks 129,330 122,627 6,703 FY 2018 General Police 01-210-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 14,333 13,590 743 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2018 General Police 01-210-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 184,704 182,664 2,040 FY 2018 General Police 01-210-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 650,440 729,860 (79,420) FY 2018 General Police 01-210-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 3,694 3,640 54 FY 2018 General Police 01-210-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 57,224 53,244 3,980 FY 2018 General Police 01-210-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 5,975 5,433 542 FY 2018 General Comm Devlp 01-220-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 198,419 195,666 2,753 FY 2018 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 21,990 21,685 305 FY 2018 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 17,164 16,953 211 FY 2018 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 60,175 68,562 (8,387) FY 2018 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 364 338 26 FY 2018 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 5,239 4,901 338 FY 2018 General Comm Devlp 01-220-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 578 515 63 FY 2018 General PW-Streets 01-410-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 317,505 312,962 4,543 FY 2018 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 36,851 36,347 504 FY 2018 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 24,857 24,510 347 FY 2018 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 111,484 128,290 (16,806) FY 2018 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 676 661 15 FY 2018 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 10,344 9,646 698 FY 2018 General PW-Streets 01-410-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 1,122 1,005 117 12 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2018 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5240 Retirees-Group Health Insurance 57,663 39,604 18,059 FY 2018 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5241 Retirees-Dental Insurance - 1,000 (1,000) FY 2018 General Admin Services 01-640-52-00-5242 Retirees-Vision Insurance 100 (100) Net Effect on Fund Balance (61,165) FY 2018 Water Water Ops 51-510-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 334,131 327,697 6,434 FY 2018 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 38,361 37,648 713 FY 2018 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 25,769 25,277 492 FY 2018 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 123,259 139,836 (16,577) Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2018 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 780 751 29 FY 2018 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 8,383 8,972 (589) FY 2018 Water Water Ops 51-510-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 1,122 991 131 Net Effect on Fund Balance (9,367) FY 2018 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 190,000 187,544 2,456 FY 2018 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 21,500 21,007 493 FY 2018 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 14,500 14,200 300 FY 2018 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 70,017 58,670 11,347 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2018 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 442 380 62 FY 2018 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 5,765 3,607 2,158 FY 2018 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 646 417 229 Net Effect on Fund Balance 17,045 FY 2018 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 434,602 427,948 6,654 FY 2018 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 48,498 47,761 737 FY 2018 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 34,000 33,487 513 FY 2018 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 151,328 172,086 (20,758) FY 2018 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 1,041 1,020 21 FY 2018 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 13,911 13,025 886 FY 2018 Park&Rec Parks Dept 79-790-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 1,501 1,365 136 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 FY 2018 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-50-00-5010 Salaries&Wages 245,067 240,745 4,322 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2018 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5212 Retirement Plan Contribution 27,300 26,714 586 FY 2018 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5214 FICA Contribution 25,000 24,216 784 FY 2018 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 92,372 103,205 (10,833) FY 2018 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 624 615 9 FY 2018 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 6,579 5,906 673 13 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes FY 2018 Park&Rec Rec Dept 79-795-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 782 687 95 Net Effect on Fund Balance (16,175) FY 2018 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5216 Group Health Insurance 123,499 127,956 (4,457) FY 2018 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5222 Group Life Insurance 650 619 31 Revised projections based on updated FY 2014 FY 2018 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5223 Dental Insurance 8,898 8,057 841 salary,benefit and insurance amounts FY 2018 Library Library Ops 82-820-52-00-5224 Vision Insurance 986 874 112 Net Effect on Fund Balance (3,473) Aggregate Effect on FY 2018 Fund Balance (73,135) Budget AAiH21MgflLhL5 FY 2013 Projected General Admin Services 01-640-54-00-5449 KenCom 22,000 (22,000) Revised based on updated information FY 2014 General Admin Services 01-640-54-00-5449 KenCom 26,000 (26,000) Net Effect on Fund Balance (48,000) Budget AAiH21MgRLhL6 FY 2014 General Administration 01-110-54-00-5473 Kendall Co Paratransit 15,000 30,000 (15,000) FY 2014 General Health&Sanitation 01-540-54-00-5443 Leaf Pickup - 6,000 (6,000) FY 2015 General Administration 01-110-54-00-5473 Kendall Co Paratransit 30,000 (30,000) FY 2015 General Health&Sanitation 01-540-54-00-5443 Leaf Pickup 6,000 (6,000) FY 2016 General Administration 01-110-54-00-5473 Kendall Co Paratransit 30,000 (30,000) Kendall County Paratransit&Leaf Pickup Services FY 2016 General Health&Sanitation 01-540-54-00-5443 Leaf Pickup 6,000 (6,000) added back to Budget-FY 2014-2018 FY 2017 General Administration 01-110-54-00-5473 Kendall Co Paratransit 30,000 (30,000) FY 2017 General Health&Sanitation 01-540-54-00-5443 Leaf Pickup 6,000 (6,000) FY 2018 General Administration 01-110-54-00-5473 Kendall Co Paratransit 30,000 (30,000) FY 2018 General Health&Sanitation 01-540-54-00-5443 Leaf Pickup 6,000 (6,000) Net Effect on Fund Balance (165,000) 14 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dent Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes Dom ` 1 FY 2014 City-Wide Capital City-Wide Capital 23-230-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program 750,000 585,863 164,137 FY 2014 Water Water Ops 51-510-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program - 206,340 (206,340) FY 2015 City-Wide Capital City-Wide Capital 23-230-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program 750,000 600,821 149,179 FY 2015 Water Water Ops 51-510-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program - 845,690 (845,690) FY 2015 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program - 343,640 (343,640) Road to Better Roads Program adjustments for FY FY 2016 City-Wide Capital City-Wide Capital 23-230-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program 750,000 605,022 144,978 2014-2018 based on revised infrastructure FY 2016 Water Water Ops 51-510-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program - 972,800 (972,800) improvement numbers presented at the March 19th Public Works Committee meeting FY 2016 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program - 186,580 (186,580) FY 2017 City-Wide Capital City-Wide Capital 23-230-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program 795,000 573,075 221,925 FY 2017 Water Water Ops 51-510-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program - 667,280 (667,280) FY 2017 Sewer Sewer Ops 52-520-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program - 342,950 (342,950) FY 2018 Water Water Ops 51-510-60-00-6025 Road to Better Roads Program - 107,160 (107,160) Net Effect on Fund Balance (2,992,221) Lim 1 0 FY 2015 General Health&Sanitation 01-540-54-00-5441 Garbage Services-Sr Subsidy 43,160 75,000 (31,840) FY 2016 General Health&Sanitation 01-540-54-00-5441 Garbage Services-Sr Subsidy - 75,000 (75,000) Senior garbage subsidy included-per City Council direction FY 2017 General Health&Sanitation 01-540-54-00-5441 Garbage Services-Sr Subsidy - 75,000 (75,000) FY 2018 General Health&Sanitation 01-540-54-00-5441 Garbage Services-Sr Subsidy - 75,000 (75,000) Net Effect on Fund Balance (256,840) 15 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes Overall Effect on Fund Balance/Fund Balance Equivalent FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Totals General (22,000) (97,181) ??273 (206,912) 470,966 299,824 317,470 Motor Fuel Tax (16,000) 16,000 City-Wide Capital 164,137 149,179 144,978 (458,294) 0 0 Debt Service 26,386 42,860 (129,402) (60,156) Water (211,203) (851,804) (980,294) (675,683) (116,527) (2,835,511) Sewer 13,410 (329,219) (171,046) (326,684) 17,045 (796,494) Parks&Recreation (8,294) (10,486) (12,897) (14,488) (16,175) (62,340) Library (2,547) (2,804) (3,087) (3,274) (3,473) (15,185) Entity-Wide Total (22,000) (157,678) (1,172,361) (1,202,872) (964,597) 67,292 (3,452,216) 16 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes City Fund Balance/Fund Balance Equivalent Adjusted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected General 3,423,724 2,620,955 3,123,713 3,418,143 2,435,002 2,174,847 Fox Hill SSA 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) Sunflower SSA 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) Motor Fuel Tax 1,055,588 605,132 453,020 255,653 32,884 0 Municipal Building (573,374) City-Wide Capital 373,437 691,053 4,883,879 703,540 0 0 Vehicle&Equipment 38,572 22,635 Debt Service 10,686 11,611 12,536 Water 1,379,272 1,160,768 296,322 (713,531) (1,417,857) (1,549,395) Sewer 2,895,977 2,679,427 1,870,953 1,424,454 806,665 514,439 Land Cash 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) Countryside TIF 1,573,929 (512,684) (634,131) (655,579) (677,026) (698,474) Downtown TIF 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 djusted Entity-Wide Tot 10,547,746 7,705,164 10,059,068 4,205,810 1,363,147 585,235 17 Effect on Fund Fiscal Year Fund Dept Account Number Description Original Amount Revised Amount Balance Notes Parks&Recreation Fund Balance/Fund Balance Equivalent Adjusted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Parks&Recreation 293,043 322,699 233,653 225,351 217,278 205,746 Park&Recreation Capita 90,698 73,923 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 Recreation Center (467,468) djusted Entity-Wide Tot (83,727) 396,622 291,801 283,724 275,876 264,569 Library Fund Balance Adjusted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Proiected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Library 400,154 407,430 412,096 405,220 390,333 391,963 Library Debt Service 200 400 600 800 1,000 Library Capital 18,830 0 0 0 0 0 djusted Entity-Wide Tot 418,984 407,630 412,496 405,820 391,133 392,963 18 ti uF - EST. � O � � FISCAL YEAR 2014 BUDGET County Seat of Kendall Coun r ' 1 MR 1, 2013 m APRIL 30, 2014 United City of Yorkville, Illinois Fiscal Year 2014 Budget May 1, 2013 to April 30, 2014 Elected Officials Mayor: Gary J. Golinski 1 st Ward Alderman: Carlo Colosimo 1 st Ward Alderman: Ken Koch 2nd Ward Alderman: Jackie Milschewski 2nd Ward Alderman: Larry Kot 3rd Ward Alderman: Marty Munns 3rd Ward Alderman: Chris Funkhouser 4th Ward Alderman: Rose Spears 4th Ward Alderman: Diane Teeling City Clerk: Beth Warren Administration City Administrator: Bart Olson Director of Finance: Rob Fredrickson Director of Public Works: Eric Dhuse Chief of Police: Rich Hart Director of Community Development: Krysti Barksdale-Noble Interim Director of Parks & Recreation: Laura Schraw Library Director: Michelle Pfister TABLE OF CONTENTS Budget Summary Budget Memorandum 1 Revenues by Category 36 Expenditures by Category 37 Fund Balance History 38 Revenue Budget Summary 39 Expenditure Budget Summary 40 Fund Balance Summary 41 General Fund General(0 1)Fund Summary 42 Revenue Detail 43 Administration 45 Finance 48 Community Relations 50 Engineering 52 Police 54 Community Development 57 Public Works 59 Administrative Services 62 Other Budgetary Funds Fox Hill SSA(11)Fund 65 Sunflower SSA(12)Fund 67 Motor Fuel Tax(15)Fund 69 Municipal Building(16)Fund 72 City-Wide Capital(23)Fund 74 Vehicle&Equipment(25)Fund 77 Debt Service (42)Fund 80 Water(5 1)Fund 82 Sewer(52)Fund 86 Land Cash(72)Fund 90 Parks &Recreation(79)Fund 93 Recreation Center(80)Fund 97 Library Operations (82)Fund 100 Library Debt Service(83)Fund 104 Library Capital(84)Fund 106 Fox Industrial TIF (85)Fund 108 Countryside TIF(87) 110 Downtown TIF (88)Fund 112 Miscellaneous Consolidated Budget Sheets 114 Budgeted Cash Flow Estimations 117 Originally Proposed Property Tax&Abatement Schedule 121 Allocated Revenues &Expenditures-Aggregated 122 o Memorandum To: City Council EST. _ 1836 From: Bart Olson, City Administrator -4 -� CC: Department Heads County Scat a� p Date: February 7, 2013 proposal L budget bJ Suject: FY 14 E g p P Purpose: Please accept this report and budget spreadsheet as an updated proposal for the FY 14 budget. The budget proposed for approval by the City Council is for expenses and revenues scheduled to be spent and collected, respectively,between May 1, 2013 and April 30, 2014. Background and "the big picture": The City Council last discussed a comprehensive budget proposal in April 2012, when we approved the FY 13 budget, with additional information for FY 14, FY 15, FY 16, and FY 17. This approval represented the first five year budget for the City, and we return to a five year-budget again this year. The main discussion for last year's budget involved the relatively good years of FY 13 and FY 14, and then a deteriorating budget picture in FY 15 and beyond. In this year's proposed budget, we stabilize the general fund at above 15% fund balance through FY 17 and propose to draw down fund balance across all funds for each year over the next five fiscal years. We have done this with extremely conservative or no revenue growth projections, implementing a road infrastructure fee, implementing a sewer infrastructure fee,reducing the water infrastructure fee, severely restricting future hires in all departments and total cuts of certain City services. While last year's five year picture was that of potential for serious financial trouble in FY 16 and FY 17, we can say with this budget proposal that FY 16, FY 17, and FY 18 are somewhat better. In last year's budget narrative, we stated that a $3,000,000 budget-wide fund balance was the threshold into major financial issues, including short term borrowing. For this budget proposal, we do not expect any year-end budget-wide fund balance to dip below $3.75 million. As we stated last year, budgets three years into the future and beyond(FY 16+) are highly variable, and should be monitored throughout the next two fiscal years. The stabilization of the general fund and the planned reduction of the City's sewer fund in this proposal is a targeted decision to give the City maximum flexibility in future years and to improve the City's bond rating,which will in turn improve the City's financial picture. For example, over the last several fiscal years the City has maintained an adequate cash flow position, but almost none of this cash was available to the general fund—as it was being held by the sewer and water funds. While this money is allowed to be used on a day-to-day basis to "pay the bills", it is not a solid financial principle to continue to be flush with cash in the enterprise funds and restricted funds (i.e. TIF funds) and be barren of unrestricted funds in the general fund. We have started to reverse this trend in FY 13, and hope to continue that trend over the next five fiscal years, even if it means a slight decrease in aggregate fund balance from our FY 13 figures. 1 Changes in budgeting Last year's budget narrative memo included an overview by discussing the "easy years vs. the hard years." In last year's budget proposal, we had forecasted two years of strength, a year of plateau, and two years of fiscal distress. This year, we have proposed a number of significant policy changes which alter that budget evolution slightly,based on our past two years of budget success. We propose five straight years of gradual fiscal decline due to funding many large capital projects. However, this year's budget proposal has stability in FY 17 and FY 18. Accordingly, we have chosen to give an overview of each fiscal year separately, with emphasis given to how this year's proposal is different from last year's proposal. We've completed two major changes in this year's budget. The first is the consolidation of the various impact fee funds into a vehicle and equipment fund. The Public Works Capital, Parks Capital and Police Capital funds were consolidated into this one fund, based on the recommendation of our auditors and management's discretion. Each impact fee fund balance will be tracked separately at the bottom of this fund. The second major change is that we've "trued up"the City's operational funds by transferring money from operations to close out the municipal building impact fee fund and REC Center funds, and zeroed out all long-term deficits in the MFT fund, city wide capital fund, and the new vehicle and equipment fund. Year-by-year summary,FY 13 projections In April 2012, we approved the FY 13 budget with a$931,000 general fund surplus, and a moderate overall budget surplus ($130,000). Our current projections have us at a $2,175,000 general fund surplus and a total budgeted surplus of $2,300,000. The major movement on our financial picture has been a result of conservative revenue projections and controlled expenses from our departments. Municipal sales taxes are likely to be lower than FY 12,but they are performing much better than we had expected, given the closure of ProBuild. We conservatively estimated non-home rule sales taxes at $1.5M (currently projected at $1.8M). State income taxes have been unexpectedly high, and are projected to eclipse budgeted amounts by over$200,000. We settled a lawsuit with Fox Moraine over unpaid landfill application fees from 2006, resulting in an $115,000 payment to the City. We are predicting that every operating department in the City will be under budget, except for the REC Center. All of this results in our prediction that fund balance in the City's general fund will be at$3.445 million or 31.8% at the end of FY 13. This marks the first time that fund balance in the City's general fund has been above 15% since FY 08. However, we stated in the FY 12 audit presentation that two major issues remained to be resolved—the closure of the municipal building impact fee fund($573,000 fund debt) and the REC Center(estimated FY 13 fund debt at $468,000). Year-by-year summary,FY 14 proposed budget For FY 14, we propose that the general fund be approved with a $700,000 deficit,resulting in the general fund's —30% fund balance to be reduced to —20%,but still within the City's 15-25% fund balance policy range. With the Countryside TIF payout expected in late calendar year 2013, we expect the total fund balance of the City(which is an indicator of overall cash flow) to decrease by $2.7 million from FY 13 to FY 14. We feel this is acceptable given the relatively stable budget picture over the next four fiscal years, and the significant budget improvement in FY 13. 2 This FY 14 proposal is different from last year's FY 14 budget proposal. In last year's budget proposal, we predicted FY 14 would be a relatively break-even year in the general fund: slightly more than $12.5 million in revenues, and slightly less than $12.5 million in expenses, for a $36,000 surplus. Last year, we did not anticipate the rapid deterioration of the REC Center's budget caused by the City's decision not to purchase the facility, we had not yet planned to close out the municipal building fund, and we did not budget to eliminate the anticipated negative fund balance position of the public works capital fund resulting from debt service payments associated with the 185 Wolf Street building. All of these items will significantly impact the general fund. On the positive side, we have seen improvements in the municipal sales tax, non-home rule sales tax, and state income tax estimates. Further, we will realize savings in code enforcement officer part-time salaries (even while expanding hours from FY 13), in-house inspections, liability insurance and legal fees. We propose to cut City participation in Kendall Area Transit due to its relatively low use and under the argument that this service would be most equitably funded via the County budget, and not a hybrid City-County funding system. We propose to cut leaf pickup services here, for reasons outlined below. Finally, we propose to eliminate the senior garbage subsidy over a two year period,beginning with a partial rollback in FY 14. Pursuant to the City Council goals, we have focused on road improvements in the FY 14 budget. Between the MFT and City wide capital budgets, the City has set aside $1 million in FY 14. This budget is made possible by the aforementioned utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee,which is a modification of the sewer infrastructure fee, and is described in the "items of note" section in further detail. From an overall budget surplus perspective, last year's budget proposal had anticipated a modest decrease of$246,000. Our current FY 14 budget proposal anticipates a deficit amount of$2.7 million. This ten-fold change is due primarily to the inclusion of the Countryside TIF incentive payout, and secondarily the closure of the REC Center. Again, we feel this is acceptable in the context of the five- year budget. Year-by-year summary, FY 15 proiected budget For FY 15, we proposed that the general fund be approved with a $630,000 surplus, bringing our fund balance back up to 27%. This surplus is made possible by the imposition of the utility-bill- based road infrastructure fee. With the year-end in-flux of Game Farm Road bond proceeds, the City will be in an artificially-positive total budget surplus. Without those proceeds, the City's overall budget is in deficit in FY 15. This year's FY 15 proposal is significantly different from last year's FY 15 proposal,which had suggested that the City would have a$300,000 general fund deficit. Revenues in non-home rule sales tax and state income tax have significantly outperformed our estimates, and we have revised our FY 15 estimates higher. With the opening of the NCG movie theater in FY 14, we expect amusement taxes to significantly increase in FY 151. With the imposition of the utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee, the City's general fund does not have to transfer any money into the City wide capital fund to finance the FY 15 Road to Better Roads program. Our proposal to rescind the senior discount on garbage rates continues with another partial rollback in FY 15. Among these financial improvements, a lower-than- previously-expected health insurance increases throughout all departments, lower health insurance costs for elected officials caused by non-participation, and reduced legal fees. These cost reductions are 1 As a reminder,our economic incentive agreement with the developer requires rebate of a portion of the movie theater amusement taxes for the first several years of the project. 3 offsetting increases in Parks and Recreation costs due to the REC Center closure, Public Works vehicle replacements, and salary line-item increases caused by a change in our budgeting assumptions. Pursuant to the City Council goals, we have focused on road improvements in the FY 15 budget. Between the MFT and City wide capital budgets,the City has set aside $1 million in FY 15. This budget is made possible by the aforementioned utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee. We propose to bond for Game Farm Road improvements in FY 15, and start the project in earnest in late FY 15. This schedule fits within the City's timeframe for receiving federal stimulus funds for the project. This budget contains funding for the City's portion of the US 34 project between 47 and Orchard Road, currently scheduled with IDOT for construction funding in FY 15. From a total budget perspective, we had expected FY 15 to be the first of three years of significant reduction in the City's aggregated fund balance. Last year's budget proposal had FY 15 showing a $1.4 million total reduction. This year's budget proposal has a $3.5 million temporary surplus, due to the Game Farm Road bond. Without those bond proceeds, the City's aggregate fund balance would decrease by over$1 million. Year-by-year summary, FY 16 proiections For FY 16, we have proposed a $501,000 surplus in the general fund, resulting in a projected fund balance of 30%. This surplus is made possible by the imposition of the utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee. With the year-long outflow of Game Farm Road expenditures, the City will be in a deficit total budget position due to the spend down of bond proceeds from the previous year. Without these capital expenditures, the City's aggregate budget is neutral in FY 16. Much of the narrative on the difference between last year's FY 15 proposal and this year's FY 15 proposal is echoed in our FY 16 analysis. This year's FY 16 proposal is significantly different from last year's FY 16 proposal, which had suggested that the City would have a $995,000 general fund deficit. Non-home rule sales tax revenues and state income tax revenues are much higher. Amusement taxes should be much higher, due to the opening of the NCG movie theater. With the road infrastructure fee, the City does not have to transfer any money into the city wide capital fund in FY 16. This is the first year of the full rollback of the senior garbage subsidy. Limited hiring throughout all departments results in savings in the police department in officer positions. These savings are offset in increased costs for squad cars and public works vehicles, IT, and special engineering services. With the Game Farm Road program bonded in FY 15, much of the work will be completed and billed in FY 16. The City has budgeted a complete resurfacing of Cannonball Road, between Blackberry Shore Lane and Amanda Lane, offset by federal funding of$300,000. The Route 71 resurfacing project between 47 and Orchard Road is scheduled by IDOT to be completed in FY 16, so we have budgeted accordingly. At first glance, FY 16 appears to have a significant total budget deficit. With the in-flux of bond proceeds for Game Farm Road in FY 15 and the majority of expenditures covered in FY 16, we expect a —$4.6 million reduction in the City's overall fund balance position. Last year's budget proposal had FY 16 at a $1 million budgeted deficit. While this seems better on its face, it should be noted that the FY 16 deficit essentially wipes out the previous year's surplus as bond proceeds are used to finance the Game 4 Farm Road project. Without the Game Farm Road expenses, the City's overall fund balance position decreases by$800,000. Year-by-year summary, FY 17 and FY 18 projections We stated last year that any budget proposal beyond 3 years in the future is highly speculative and variable. Nonetheless,we put forth the following proposals for FY 17 and FY 18. We expect that each of FY 17 and FY 18 will result in a general fund deficit; $1,454,000 and $560,000 respectively. In both of these years, the citywide capital fund requires a significant increase in transfers to complete all capital projects planned. Further, the City is projected to start paying on the Game Farm Road bond in FY 17 and has some increased debt service payments in FY 17 and FY 18. These increased debt service payments also correspond with a continued rollback of non-abated property taxes in FY 17 and FY 18.. Even if the road infrastructure fee, sewer infrastructure fee, and water infrastructure fee is left in place through FY 18, the City still expects to see total budgetary deficits in FY 17 and FY 18. The narratives on the difference in last year's FY 16 proposal and this year's FY 16 proposal are substantially similar to the FY 17 proposals. In FY 17,the City will complete the Cannonball LAFO project, started in FY 16. The Game Farm Road project will wrap up in FY 17, and the Kennedy Road bike trail will finish in FY 18. We have also budgeted for the recently awarded ITEP Downtown Aesthetics grant, expected to be completed in FY 17 and FY 18, with reimbursement received in FY 18. Overall budgetary deficits in FY 17 and FY 18 are set to be negative at $1.9 million and $865,000 respectively. At the end of FY 17, the City is currently projecting to be in sight of significant financial problems, caused by ballooning bond payments just past our five-year budget outlook. As we stated last year, we have projected revenues and expenses very conservatively in the prior years—so our hope is that as each fiscal year is completed our projections turn out to be better than we expected. If not, we are forecasting the problems five years in advance. Items to note—M2 picture Before we get into the detail of the various items to note throughout the budget, I would like to reiterate that many of our largest budget issues from past years have been satisfied in this proposal: a fund balance above 15% for all operational funds throughout FY 17, a relatively stable cash position, full funding of major capital projects including Game Farm Road, River Road Bridge, the ITEP Downtown Aesthetics grant, full funding of the new"Road to Better Roads"program, a planned reduction in overall City property taxes through FY 18, a planned drawdown of non-abated property taxes through FY 18, and plan to improve the City's bond rating. While these notes are highlighted throughout this budget narrative, I wanted to remind everyone of those points prior to discussing the following lesser items of note. Items to note—reduction in property taxes In accordance with the City's previously planned drawdown of non-abated property taxes (attached on page 121), we offer the following: 1) We propose no change to the past policy decision that the City's general fund property taxes be increased 1-2% each year depending on consumer price index(CPI) amounts and new construction, under tax cap rules. 5 2) The City's non-abated property taxes will continue to be rolled back each year, although we are proposing a slightly different schedule that adds one year to the planned rollback. 3) Combining item#1 and#2 above, the City's overall property taxes are expected to go down every year through FY 18, subject to yearly review and approval by the City Council: a. New plan: i. 2.9%reduction in FY 14 (levy ordinances already approved by City Council) ii. 2%reduction in FY 15 iii. I%reduction in FY 16 iv. I%reduction in FY 17 v. I%reduction in FY 18 b. Old plan: i. 2.6%reduction in FY 14 ii. 2.3%reduction in FY 15 iii. 2.7%reduction in FY 16 iv. 0.4%reduction in FY 17 v. Undetermined increase in FY 18 4) We propose to refinance the Library 2005B Construction Bond, saving residents about $50,000 per year in debt service payments over the remaining bond term, and resulting in a lower Library property tax bill than expected over the next 11 years. Further details are below. Items to note - City Council goals The City Council passed a list of 16 goals, ranked in order of importance. As stated above, we are proposing to fix only goal one and goal two in this budget proposal: build fund balance and road improvement maintenance program. Two goals tied for third priority police staffing levels and economic development. Unfortunately, police staffing levels are in direct conflict with goal one and goal two. So, we have proposed no additional officers for this budget proposal. However, this will be reevaluated each year based on the performance of the budget. Given that this is the next City Council goal, it would be first in line for a new proposal. Further down the list of goals,we specifically did not address in the budget stricter code enforcement on property maintenance, capital improvement planning, website improvement, sidewalk improvement, home rule referendum, public riverfront improvement, tourism, Metra extension, community outreach, or updating the City Council chamber. Progress can still be made on each item, and funding still remains to accomplish those items—but no new funding proposals were entertained on these items. Items to note—bond ratings and refinancings In late 2012, the City's bond rating was reviewed by Standard& Poor's. We were hoping to receive an upgrade from our current BBB+ general obligation bond rating,but did not. Instead S&P changed our financial outlook from stable to positive, and our management practices from standard to "good". We see that as step in the right direction. However, one of the primary reasons for the lack of upgrade was that the City's cash position in the general fund was poor, and that we were not adhering to our own fund balance policy. Specifically, we showed no cash in the general fund in the FY 12 audit, which means the general fund had a negative cash position at the end of FY 12. As we've discussed in 6 prior budget and audit discussions, the sewer and water funds have been propping up the general fund operations for the past few fiscal years. These funds are stable due to the imposition of the water infrastructure fee,bond refinancing (supported by the implementation of the non-home rule sales tax) and the non-abatement of property taxes relating to certain debt service issues. Concurrent with S&P's review of our bond rating, the City's financial advisor was targeting a Library construction bond refinancing in 2013 that would save the residents a projected amount of $720,000 over the remaining life of the bond. When the bond upgrade did not materialize, that projected savings was reduced by $150,000. This underscores the importance of budgeting for positive outcomes—if we had a slightly better bond rating,we could have capitalized by saving even more money through refinancing. The importance of immediate financial improvement is further highlighted given the current bond market and its historic-low interest rates—we may not be able to achieve as good of interest rates in a few years, even with a better bond rating. In this budget proposal, we do recommend refinancing of the Library 2005B construction bond to capture the projected net present value savings of$480,000 savings over the life of the bond. This will result in a direct property tax reduction to the residents under the Library property tax when compared to the current debt service schedule, and will result in an overall City property tax reduction over the next five fiscal years. Items to note—water infrastructure fee, sewer infrastructure fee, and utility bill based road infrastructure fee As discussed in the last budget proposal, the end of the Rob Roy sewer connection fee payments by Pulte/Centex in the Bristol Bay development occurs in FY 13. This results in a $600,000 hole in revenues in the sewer fund, which is not sustainable. We had projected that an $8.25 per month per user sewer infrastructure fee would need to be implemented on May 1, 2013 to offset this loss in revenue. Unfortunately, these revenues are still needed,but we are proposing they be placed into different funds. For the reasons stated above in the bond rating and refinancing items to note section, the City has a strong ratio of fund balance to expenses in the sewer and water funds, but does not have adequate fund balance in the general fund to support all of the planned capital projects out of the city wide capital fund. This problem could be potentially remedied if the City could legally and permanently transfer funds from the sewer and water funds to the general fund—however, such a transfer would violate a number of City ordinances and budgeting principles. Thus, the problem remains: how do we balance out the relative wealth of the water and sewer funds with the need to fund multiple capital projects in the general fund? In short, we propose to reduce the water infrastructure fee, implement a sewer infrastructure fee in an amount much lower than originally proposed, and implement a utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee, for a total amount that is cheaper than last year's sewer and water infrastructure fee proposal. Specifically, we first propose to nominally drawdown fund balance equivalency in the water fund over time by reducing the water infrastructure fee from $8.25 per month per user to $4 per month per user. This halved fee, results in minimal water fund deficits over the next five fiscal years, leaving the water fund with a 47% fund balance in FY 18, when debt service payments will balloon. Second, we propose to implement the previously discussed sewer infrastructure fee,but at a reduced rate. Last year, we proposed an $8.25 per month per user sewer infrastructure fee to offset the 7 loss of the Rob Roy sewer connection fees. This year, we propose a $4 per month per user sewer infrastructure fee. This lower-than-planned fee results in moderate annual sewer fund deficits over the next five fiscal years, leaving the sewer fund with a projected 51% fund balance at the end of FY 18. However, unlike the water fund,most bonds in the sewer fund will be expired or soon to expire in FY 18,with no balloon payments. Finally, we propose to implement a utility-bill-based road infrastructure fee at $8 per month per user. The road infrastructure fee would show up on the utility bill as a line-item fee, and would be paid in the exact same manner as the water infrastructure fees and sewer infrastructure fees The proposed road infrastructure fee is our name for what the state statutes allow as a"vehicle tax", which is the state statute used to implement vehicle stickers. Unlike most municipal vehicle stickers,we would propose a flat fee for each household with no actual sticker. The road infrastructure fee ordinance would be drafted with the assumption that each household has at least one vehicle, and that each household should pay for a share of road improvements equally. If a household had no vehicles registered to its address, they could have the fee removed if the property owner or tenant came to City Hall and signed a form verifying they have no vehicles registered at the subject address. The police department would then be able to perform a compliance check of the address via database. This assumption of vehicle ownership gets rid of the cumbersome process of purchasing the vehicle sticker and the administrative problems of sticker checks by the Police Department. Further, the City saves money on reminder mailings, the cost of the physical sticker, and the staff time associated with processing several thousand sticker payments. All of the money generated by the road infrastructure fee would be directly deposited into the City wide capital fund to fund ongoing capital projects, including the Road to Better Roads program. While I acknowledge how severely unpopular a road infrastructure fee will be, I offer the following: 1) Without the fee, the City is not going to be able to fund the Road to Better Roads program, which is currently being proposed at only half the recommended level by our engineers. The money we do not spend on road improvements this year, becomes multiplied over the next several years. 2) The aggregate totals of the water infrastructure fee, sewer infrastructure fee and road infrastructure fee will be $16 per month per user. In last year's budget proposal, the water infrastructure fee and proposed sewer infrastructure fee totaled$16.50 per month per user. So the new proposal is slightly cheaper for residents, allows us to complete capital projects, and allows money to flow into the general fund, where the end result could be a bond rating upgrade, further refinancing, and more savings. 3) The City was able to reduce per home garbage costs by $4 per month last year, and electricity costs by an average of$30 per month per user. While the imposition of the sewer infrastructure fee and road infrastructure fee is an uptick from last year, we have managed to cut costs for residents by over$27 per month in the past year. Items to note—raises and health insurance contributions 8 This budget proposal contains a 2% net increase in salaries for FY 14 and no planned raises beyond FY 14. The FY 14 raises are 2% net because we are proposing to increase the percentages employees pay into their health insurance but offset that change in contribution percentage with a supplemental salary increase. The specific proposal involves giving all employees who currently participate in the City's insurance program a—4-5% gross salary increase, but increasing their health insurance contribution percentages to 12% for HMO and 15% for PPO plans. The specific administration of the gross raises would involve an analysis of the difference between what they paid last year and what they would have paid last year under the same plan with the new contribution rate. The employee would then be given that exact amount as a gross pay increase. So,the employees will still be paying for any year-over-year increase in health insurance costs, and will still cover any increased costs should they change health insurance plans. For example: Employee A makes $50,000 per year and has the HMO single plan. With a 2%raise, the employee makes $51,000. In 2012, the employee pays 8.5% for HMO single, or$471 per year. The move to a 12%HMO contribution would mean the employee would pay $665 per year, or an increase of$194 per year. So, for this employee the City would make the annual salary increase an extra $194, for a total salary of$51,194. Employee B makes $25,000 per year and has the PPO family plan. With a 2%raise, the employee makes $25,500. In 2012, the employee pays 9% for PPO family, or$1,980 per year. The move to a 15%PPO contribution would mean the employee would pay $3,299 per year, or an increase of$1,319 per year. So, for this employee the City would make the annual salary increase an extra$1,319, for a total salary of$26,819. This move to a higher contribution allows the City to save money over the long-term when employees leave and positions are refilled, or when new positions are created and hired. Further, the employees would see no immediate out-of-pocket costs. Finally, this is being proposed to move benefits more towards our public sector and private sector comparables. Items to note—fund closures As recommended by the City's auditors, we have closed the municipal building impact fee fund. This is completed by transferring $573,000 from the City's general fund to the municipal building impact fee fund. This transfer amount zeroes out the ongoing fund deficit, which allows us to close it. A similar process is completed for the REC Center fund. Since the City is leaving the REC Center, the fund must be closed. So, we have transferred $556,000 into the REC Center fund in FY 14. This amount will fluctuate based on actual revenue losses sustained and any repairs to the building completed by the City. Items to note—cuts in services With the goal of the City Council to get to 15% fund balance over each year of the budget proposal, certain service cuts are recommended in the budget. In addition to economic considerations, each service cut recommendation is coupled with a fairness argument. 9 Leaf pickup is recommended to be cut because the majority of residents do not use the service, and Advanced Disposal provides a substantially similar service for free. Kendall Area Transit is recommended to be cut because only a few hundred residents from the City utilize the service each year, yet the service costs the City $23,000. In 2012, 106 Yorkville residents were registered with KAT. In 2011 and parts of 2010, 312 Yorkville residents were registered. Throughout all of 2012, 3,533 unique rides were given in Yorkville (just under 300 per month average). Finally, as this is a County-wide service, we feel that the most equitable form of funding this service would be for the entire County to equally fund this, and not the current funding format where Yorkville residents are paying as a County resident and as a City resident. The senior garbage subsidy is recommended to be rolled back over two fiscal years and completely eliminated in FY 16. Items to note—minor things that didn't get funded Albeit minor,we did not propose funding for participation in the annual conference of the International Council of Shopping Centers this May. The cost of attendance would likely be less than $5,000 but we did not feel it should be funded given the other service cuts proposed. Similarly, we did not fund general City Hall office renovations. The cost of renovations (new furniture,paint, minor repairs) would likely be less than $10,000. Items to note—engineering department cost anal We have been reviewing engineering department costs since choosing to outsource in 2011. In summary, EEI is between $125,000 and $285,000 cheaper per year for the City than in-house staff. That calculation is based upon: 1) In FY 10, our engineering department had 5 employees and the cost of the department was about$535,000. 2) In FY 11, our engineering department had 3.5 employees and the cost of the department was about$400,000. 3) Our analysis of EEI's services has been that they cost the City about $250,000 to $275,000 per year in fees that we could have done in house. 4) In my opinion, there is more engineering work in FY 13 than there was in FY 10 or FY 11. On a related note, EEI is billing out about $100,000 per year to developers for work related to inspections and punch-lists (which the City would have billed the developers for, even with in-house staff), and an additional $100,000 or so in work billed to the City for special projects (drainage studies we couldn't have done in-house, Route 47 construction review and inspections, River Road Bridge construction management, Safe Routes to School planning, and Old Jail parking lot design). Items to note—cost of services While the City budget contains a relatively clear view of how much it costs to run particular services, it is often less clear how much each resident or home actually pays towards those services. When viewed in the context of how much each resident is paying to participate in a service, the cost efficiencies of a municipal government become more apparent. We have taken a handful of specific and general City services and projects, and broken them out on a basis of two different methodologies. 10 The first methodology looks at each property tax bill and how much of that property tax bill goes to pay for a specific service. This methodology is executed by assuming 17.5% of every dollar spent by the City for general services comes from property taxes. For example, when mosquito control costs the City $8,000, we assume that $1,397 is paid for by property taxes, and the remainder of the cost is borne by sales taxes, income taxes, and all other revenue sources. The City levies about $2.28 million in total operational property taxes, meaning that 0.06% of all City property taxes go towards mosquito abatement services. Utilizing this percentage allows us to calculate the dollar amount each property tax payer is paying towards a particular service. Thus, when a tax payer pays a$753 City property tax bill (based on a $100,000 EAV home), that particular tax payer is paying $0.46 in property taxes for an entire year of mosquito abatement in the City. The second methodology looks at a property owner's shared obligation for the cost of a service, based on the value of their property compared to everyone else's in the City. In short, if you own a home that is worth $100,000 EAV, and there is $445,000,000 in total EAV in the City,you own 0.02% of all land value in Yorkville. Thus, you would be ultimately responsible for 0.02% of every City service. For example, when mosquito control costs $8,000 city wide, we assume that this particular homeowner is responsible for $1.78 of that service annually. For this methodology, we make no determination on how that pro-rata cost is paid; it can be with property taxes, sales taxes, amusement taxes, income taxes, etc. Methodology 1 How much of your Methodology 2 property taxes actually How much of the service are you goes towards this paying for,based on the relative Name of the service Annual Cost of the Service service? value of your home in the City? Mosquito control $ 8,000.00 $ 0.46 $ 1.78 REC Center budget,net operating costs $ 25,000.00 $ 1.44 $ 5.56 Kendall Area Transit $ 30,000.00 $ 1.73 $ 6.67 Training and Conferences,City-wide $ 32,500.00 $ 1.87 $ 7.22 YEDC $ 46,800.00 $ 2.69 $ 10.40 All Information Technology services $ 75,000.00 $ 4.31 $ 16.67 KenCom(FY 15) $ 150,000.00 $ 8.63 $ 33.33 Snow plowing,during an average season $ 241,950.00 $ 13.92 $ 53.77 All legal services $ 247,014.00 $ 14.21 $ 54.89 All engineering expenses $ 280,000.00 $ 16.10 $ 62.22 Game Farm Road,debt service beginning in FY 16 $ 333,719.00 $ 19.19 $ 74.16 REC Center budget,gross operating costs $ 659,467.00 $ 37.93 $ 146.55 Recreation Dept,net operating costs(79 budget) $ 790,464.00 $ 45.47 $ 175.66 Parks Dept,net operating costs $ 807,075.00 $ 46.42 $ 179.35 All Street Dept expenses $ 918,087.00 $ 52.81 $ 204.02 Road to Better Roads $ 1,000,000.00 $ 57.52 $ 222.22 All Police Dept expenses $ 3,970,028.00 $ 228.35 $ 882.23 Hometown Days $ (35,000.00) $ (2.01) $ (7.78) For all of the above items,property taxes may not actually go toward the specific service (i.e. Hometown Days, REC Center), or the service may generate its own revenues (i.e. REC Center and recreation department). Further, each Yorkville resident may pay far less than the amount shown in methodology 2, depending on whether residents buy goods in Yorkville (sales taxes are discretionary, and goods purchased outside of Yorkville go to the municipality where the store is located), have jobs (a portion of state income taxes are remitted to municipalities), and whether you choose to utilize the service (if a resident doesn't use the REC Center, they paid nothing to its budget while it was operating). The purpose of this section is to provide two simple illustrations as to how much a tax payer might pay towards a specific service, as compared to other services. 11 Items of note—vehicle replacement schedule We have proposed replacement of three older squad cars per year, with the intent to get on a 60,000 mile replacement schedule. Based on an analysis completed by City staff last year, the threshold for maintenance costs outweighing new car replacement costs is 60,000 miles. The police department currently has 18 squad cars and 2 motorcycles. Of the 18 squad cars, only 5 cars are less than 60,000 miles. We are proposing to exchange three of the older cars each year for new cars, and to trade in the 5 cars that currently have less than 60,000 miles as they approach 60,000 miles. All of the expenses for the squad cars are located in the newly created vehicle and equipment fund, as they are a capital cost. However, to adequately portray the cost of operations of the police department (and all other departments), we are showing the gap between the cost of the police cars and the available impact fees in the vehicle and equipment fund as a chargeback expense in this line-item. Public Works vehicles do not have such a strict replacement schedule, as they are much more expensive. We have budgeted for a street department truck in FY 14, and one water truck and one sewer truck in FY 15. Items of note—last year's "Things to Watch" Last year, we listed nine things in the budget narrative to watch out for throughout FY 13. Each item is listed below verbatim from the FY 13 budget proposal, along with an update on each item: Comment#1 from FY 13 - Raises In the current proposed budget, no raises are proposed through FY 17. While I hope that this is something we can re-evaluate during budget discussions, it is not something we can plan for until more information is known by the City (see "other things to watch#4"). Police officer and sergeants contracts are up on May 1, 2012, and the Public Works union contract is up on May 1, 2013. In my opinion, I expect staff turnover to increase in FY 13 if raises are not given or on the immediate horizon. a. Update—The City Council authorized 2%raises in FY 13, and we have proposed a 2%net increase across the board for FY 14. We have not proposed any raises for FY 15 and beyond, given the variable nature of the budget and under a firm belief that raises should be evaluated each year. Comment#2 from FY 13 —Vehicle replacement In order minimize long-term costs and vehicle downtime,police cars should be replaced at 60,000 miles. Only 20% of the police vehicles are under 60,000 miles. We are proposing to replace one vehicle per year,which should be an improvement with our current police squad. Also, the Police department is set to purchase two squads this spring. Parks and Public Works vehicles are on a much longer replacement schedule, because they are so expensive to purchase. These vehicles should be driven until they drop—the problem is that the vehicles are dropping. We have a limited budget for replacement vehicles each of the next few years. a. Update—We have proposed an accelerated squad car replacement schedule, at an average pace of 3 police cars per year. We have also budgeted for one public works vehicle in FY 14 and two vehicles in FY 15. 12 Comment#3 from FY 13 —Countryside TIF For Countryside TIF debt, we are expected to be upside down on this bond in FY 18 (no bond proceeds left to pay debt service scheduled through 2024. This poses a significant drain on cash-flow each year from 2013 until 2024. If this bond could be refinanced, or if we could find a developer to generate property tax increment within the TIF district, this would eliminate our FY 18 event horizon and would improve cash-flow. a. Update - The City plans on paying out the remaining bond proceeds in FY 14 to the Countryside/Kendall Crossing developer, and plans to refinance the TIF debt to improve cash-flow in the near term. Comment#4 from FY 13 —Rob Roy Sewer revenue shortfall Centex/Pulte is set to make their final, complete payment of Rob Roy sewer payments in FY 13. This leaves a $600,000 revenue gap in the sewer budget in FY 14. Thus, we are anticipating the need for an $8.25 per month per user sewer infrastructure improvement and maintenance fee, to be implemented on May 1, 2013. a. Update—The City has been forecasting this revenue shortfall for the past two years, under the premise that if the homebuilding economy didn't pick up by FY 14 that we would have to implement an $8.25 per month per user sewer infrastructure fee. For the reasons described above, the City has reduced this fee and implemented a utility bill based road infrastructure fee resulting in a slightly lower overall amount. Comment#5 from FY 13 —ProBuild closure The closure of ProBuild was announced in October 2011, and it is assumed they immediately ceased collecting new orders. Whether existing orders were paid after that timeframe is unknown. We do know that ProBuild did not exist in the building after mid- December. This means that the sales tax report received from the City in April 2012 (for January consumer purchases) will be the first sales tax report without ProBuild's sales. We have estimated a net loss of$175,000 in sales taxes from FY 12 to FY 13 as a result of this closure. a. Update - The estimated drop in sales tax of$175,000 did not appear in FY 13,but we projected a $125,000 decrease from FY 12 to FY 13. Comment#6 from FY 13 —BUILD pro.gram Will the BUILD incentive program work? Only time will tell. The early response to the program has been strong. We had originally estimated 35 building permits in FY 13, and assuming the BUILD program works and is used in its entirety, we should see a total building permit figure for FY 13 of 65 (35 without the incentive, an additional 30 because of the incentive). If for some reason this generates a larger impact,we could be looking at more building permit and development fees, water connection fees, sewer connection fees, and other impact fees. a. Update—The BUILD program was considered by the City Council to be successful and the program was extended to June 30, 2013 or an additional 30 permits, whichever comes first. As of February 5, 2013, forty-five (45) BUILD permit applications have been filed. Comment#7 from FY 13 —Revenue estimates We have been very conservative with our revenue estimates: no growth for some revenues, decreases for others, 1% and 2% increases for others. If the national and local economy ever picks up, it would not be unreasonable to see (and plan for) double digit 13 percentage increases in various revenues. If we notice major upticks in certain revenues (sales taxes, utility taxes, income taxes), we could be seeing signs of sustained economic growth. a. Update—Most revenues have beat our budget estimates, which is a product of our conservative budgeting principles. We have not seen a major uptick in any of the revenues, except for the state income tax. Comment#8 from FY 13 —March budget information Within a span of 4 weeks in mid-March through mid-April,we will receive four significant budget updates that will make some of our"unknowns" change to "knowns". These four groups of items have the ability to make or break our budget in years to come. They are: • Health insurance costs in mid-March at Administration Committee (variation in estimates could be a swing of$100,000 to $200,000 to the positive or negative) • April sales tax reports in the first two weeks of April, for purposes of seeing the impact of the ProBuild closure (could be a swing of$200,000 to the positive or negative) • April non-home rule sales tax reports in the first two weeks of April, for purposes of seeing non-home rule sales tax figures • The FY 12 actuals will be much more concrete. We are currently projecting a general fund surplus of$907,000. a. Update—Health insurance costs came in less than expected. Sales tax reports for FY 12 came in better than expected, but have dipped in FY 13. The FYE 12 general fund surplus ended up at $1.54 million. Comment# 9 from FY 13 —Engineering Inspection costs in subdivisions When a final plat is approved for residential development, the developer has the choice to pay 1.75% of an engineer's estimate of probable construction costs to cover all future infrastructure inspections up through final acceptance by the City. As a result, the City has collected large fees from residential developers in the past for work that has yet to be completed. As developers complete subdivisions (i.e. Bristol Bay and Grande Reserve), these inspections will have to be covered by the City(whether in-house staff or consultant engineers). Depending on the frequency of the buildout of the units and the size of each unit, there could be $10,000 to $20,000 expenses throughout the year(normal units may only take $2,000 to $3,000 for each round of inspections). The good news is that there are very few developments that are actively completing infrastructure, so our costs should be manageable over the next few years for this service. The bad news is that we don't have developers actively completing infrastructure (which would indicate a revived housing market). This is an issue to monitor in the future, which should be worked into our annual outsourced engineering budget. An absolute worst case scenario would require us to hire in-house engineering techs to complete subdivision inspections. a. Update - So far the budget has been in line with our estimates and we did not have to hire in-house engineering techs. One upside to the amount of subdivision issues the City has had is that I expect we will be renegotiating annexation agreements for almost every subdivision over the next few years. This gives us an opportunity to negotiate this liability away. Items of note—Last Year's "Future Obligations" Last year's budget narrative contained a list of 19 future obligations for the City, with a brief description and cost estimate of each. Almost none of those obligations were proposed within the five- year budget. This year,we have proposed funding for a few of them. 14 1) Funding of ongoing road maintenance a. Last year's narrative - In 2011, our former City Engineer threw together a grab number for yearly road maintenance simply based on an estimate of the cost to replace one mile of road, our total number of miles of roads in the City, and assuming that each road has to be replaced every 25 years; that figure was in excess of$2 million per year. Obviously, the point of the pavement management study is to figure out how to stretch out the useful life of all the roads, and over time, decrease your annual road maintenance costs. Ongoing road maintenance costs are budgeted each year at $300,000—which is our expected amount of excess non-home-rule sales tax funds b. Last year's cost estimate - $1,000,000 to $1,700,000 per year c. Update—The City's road improvement study recommended an annual program of $2 million to keep the City's road system from deteriorating. This budget proposal contains a $1 million per year for road improvements, contingent upon the creation of the utility bill based road infrastructure fee. 2) Sycamore Road and Route 34 traffic signal a. Last year's narrative - A temporary signal has been installed at this intersection since 2008. Original agreement with IDOT said that a permanent signal was supposed to be installed by 2010. Agreement was extended through 2013, at the request of the City. Permanent intersection improvements, when constructed will be three sides (two on Route 34, one on Sycamore Road). If the Sexton property (to the north) ever develops, that landowner will have to completely redo the intersection improvements to accommodate a fourth leg. Each year the temporary improvement agreement remains in place, we are responsible for 100% maintenance of the signal. Since the signal is temporary, it is not in good condition four years later, and is expensive to maintain each year($10,000). There is a chance that IDOT would force us to either put in the permanent intersection improvements or take down the temporary. More than 21,000 vehicles per day traverse this intersection on Route 34, and 900 of them use the Sycamore Road leg of the intersection. b. Last year's cost estimate - $200,000 c. Update—The estimate for this intersection improvement is now closer to $250,000. We have not proposed to install this signal within the five year budget, because we expect IDOT to come through and widen Route 34 on the east side of the City in the next five years,which will give us an opportunity to salvage traffic signal equipment from other intersections and install them at Sycamore and Route 34 for minimal cost. Further,we expect the section of Route 34 surrounding this intersection to be widened in the next 10 years. When that occurs, IDOT will pay for 67% of the overall intersection improvements. 3) Beecher Center HVAC a. Last year's narrative - The HVAC unit in the Beecher Center was originally installed in 1980. Its useful life span should have been 15 years. A complete replacement for the existing units is $400,000, because it is under the roof(the roof would have to be rebuilt). Even if individual components of the unit go out, we would not be able to replace them because nobody makes replacement parts 15 for the HVAC unit. One possible thought by staff, should this project become a necessity, is to spend an additional $250,000($750,000 total) and have the HVAC unit installed on the ground near the building, have new ducts run, and update the kitchen in the facility(economies of scale to do the projects all at once). If the HVAC unit were installed on the ground, as opposed to on the roof, we could save the roof replacement costs in the future when the HVAC unit has to be replaced again. The kitchen in the facility is currently out of code, and needs to be upgraded to meet current safety standards. b. Last year's cost estimate - $400,000 or $750,000—whenever the HVAC breaks or we think we should replace it. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 4) Fox Hill water and sewer recapture a. Last year's narrative - In 2003, the City required Fox Hill developers to oversize water and sewer mains out to the Fox Hill subdivision. This original cost for water and sewer oversizing was $807,OOO.In the recapture agreement for these projects, the City agreed to compound interest with final payback by the City due in 2023. If a developer develops in the recapture area prior to 2023, the City has the right to charge the developer their portion of the recapture fee (which then gets forwarded to the Fox Hill developer). b. Last year's cost estimate—At FYE 2012, total amount is $1.538 million. The original principal on this obligation was $807,847, meaning we have racked up $730,252 in interest in 9 years. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 5) West Ridge water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - 100 year old water mains in the area that serve 29 houses directly,many more indirectly. Old water mains tend to be undersized compared to newer water mains, and leak. Both of these cause fire protection to be diminished due to low water pressure. b. Last year's cost estimate - $140,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 6) South Main St water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - 80+year water main in the area near Van Emmon Road and Beecher St. This main services over 30 homes directly, many more indirectly. Fire protection is diminished due to low water pressure. b. Last year's cost estimate - $200,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 7) Elizabeth St water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - 60 year old water main on Elizabeth Street. This main services over 24 homes directly, and many more indirectly. Fire protection is diminished due to low water pressure. 16 b. Last year's cost estimate - $175,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 8) Orange Street water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - Water main replacement near Orange Street and Olsen Street,which will tie to dead end mains together. Connecting two dead ends in a loop will improve fire protection and water quality. b. Last year's cost estimate - $60,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 9) Olsen Street water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - 80+year water main in the area near Orange St. from South Main Street to Mill Street. Fire protection is diminished due to low water pressure. b. Last year's cost estimate - $150,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 10)Washington Street water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - 80+year water main in the area of E Washington Street. Replacement would improve fire protection and flow of water. b. Last year's cost estimate - $150,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 11)Well 7 back-up generator a. Last year's narrative - The only back-up generator in the entire City is at the treatment facility in Grande Reserve. A sustained power outage on the south side of town would result in water shortages on the south side of town. Electric connections and the concrete pad are onsite and waiting for generator installation. b. Last year's cost estimate - $350,000. c. Update—Director Dhuse is working with a local contractor on an agreement which would allow the City to rent a generator in emergencies, with a 12-hour or less delivery time. 12)Game Farm and Somonauk water main replacement a. Last year's narrative - Water main connection of two dead ends in front of Yorkville Grade School. Constructing this project would improve water service for multiple houses on a dead-end main. b. Last year's cost estimate - $65,000. 17 c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting all of the water main replacement projects during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 13)SCADA sewer monitoring system a. Last year's narrative - The City has SCADA systems on its water facilities, which allows for remote monitoring and control of industrial facilities. Installing this on our sewer lift stations and pump stations would improve safety and prevent backups. b. Last year's cost estimate - $90,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 14)Sewer system evaluation survey(SSES) a. Last year's narrative - The SSES should be completed for the sewers on the south side of town. SSES has not been conducted since 1996. Completion of the study and eventual construction of the improvements would reduce inflow and infiltration. Reducing inflow and infiltration of storm water into the sanitary sewer system will reduce YBSD's peak flows, which increases their plant capacity,which ultimately delays or eliminates the need to expand their sewer treatment plant. b. Last year's cost estimate - $110,000 to do the study, estimate of$420,000 to complete the improvements after the study is completed. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget, however we anticipate revisiting this during our selection of streets for the Road to Better Roads program. 15)Game Farm sewer repairs a. Last year's narrative - There is a short stretch of sewer main in front of Yorkville Grade School, which has individual service lines attached to the main. Changing these individual services to a combined branch would reduce the potential for backups in the future. b. Last year's cost estimate - $50,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 16)River Road sewer replacement a. Last year's narrative - Replace and move a sanitary sewer that is currently under a resident's garage near the Fox River on River Road. If we the sewer breaks before we replace it, we will have to tear down and replace a garage. If we move the sewer before it breaks, we save garage replacement costs in the future. b. Last year's cost estimate - $100,000. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 17)Bristol Bay intersection improvements a. Last year's narrative - Pursuant to the 2010 annexation agreement amendment with Bristol Bay, the City is responsible for intersection improvements at Route 30 and Route 47, Galena Road and Route 47, and at Bristol Bay Drive and Route 47. The total cost of these three improvements is over$3.3 million. The intersection improvements at Route 47 intersections of Galena Road and Route 30 18 are $1.224 million and $701,000 respectively. The remaining $1.4 million is associated with the additional subdivision entrance and traffic signal at Bristol Bay Drive. b. Last year's cost estimate - $3.329 million in total. c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 18)Beecher Center Park a. Last year's narrative - The playground equipment at Beecher Center Park is closely approaching the end of its useful life span. We anticipate the equipment to be removed in FY 13 or FY 14,with no plans to replace it. b. Last year's cost estimate—policy decision c. Update—This item is not addressed in the five-year budget. 19)Kennedy Road bike trail a. Last year's narrative - This is a City Council policy decision. We removed this from an earlier budget proposal, due to the discussion at Public Works Committee. b. Last year's cost estimate - likely $0 net cost,but project itself is $360,000 c. Update—The City Council authorized this project,under the presumption of private funding. So far, the first 4-5 years of expenses have been privately raised ($120,000). From a conservative budgeting perspective, we have left the remainder of the cost at$240,000 as a budgeted expense—in case the private group comes up short. This amount will be reevaluated each year. The small picture—items of note in the general fund Please accept the following information as discussion on individual line-items within the budget. These individual line-items may change between now and the date of approval based on City Council direction or staff recommendation (due to new information). Revenues are listed as "R#", and expenditures are listed as "E#". R1)Property taxes—corporate levy 01-000-40-00-4000 a. We propose that the City corporate levy will continue to grow by the consumer price index, allowable under the tax cap (estimated at I% increases per year), each year through FY 18. This line-item is exclusive of the police pension,bond-related, library operations, and library debt service taxes. As discussed above, the City expects total property taxes for City entities to decrease each year through FY 17. R2)Property taxes—police pension 01-000-40-00-4010 a. The FY 14 amount is expected to meet our actuarial obligations for annual funding. Future years funding amounts are estimates only, and will be analyzed each year by the police pension fund's actuary. R3)Municipal sales tax 01-000-40-00-4030 a. The expected decrease in sales taxes from the ProBuild closure have not materialized to the amount we expected. While sales taxes were down slightly from FY 11 to FY 12 to FY 13, we have seen trends of growth in individual businesses. We are forecasting a 1% growth for FY 14 and FY 15, 2% for FY 16 and FY 17, and 3% for FY 18. 19 R4)Non-home rule sales tax 01-000-40-00-4035 a. We have budgeted for the same growth trends in non-home rule sales taxes as for municipal sales taxes. R5)Amusement tax 01-000-40-00-4060 a. This is the 3% tax charged on all amusement devices and tickets within the City. The maximum amount allowable under law for this tax is 5%. The majority of this line-item is generated by Raging Waves, which has a large percentage of out-of-town visitors. R6)Admissions tax 01-000-40-00-4055 a. This is the 5% admissions tax charged at Raging Waves, authorized by their annexation agreement. This amount is remitted to Raging Waves to offset their on-site infrastructure costs. R7)Business District Tax 01-000-40-00-4070—Kendall Marketplace Business District Tax 01-000-40-00-4072—Downtown Business Dist a. Currently, this revenue line-item corresponds with an expenditure line-item of the same amount, as this tax is rebated 100% to the developer of Kendall Marketplace to pay down bonds related to public infrastructure. Although the performance of this line-item has no impact on the overall performance of the budget, it is noteworthy because it is one measurement of the ongoing performance of Kendall Marketplace. Revenues from the recently authorized downtown business district(Imperial Investments properties)will be tracked separately in a new line item shown above. R8)State income tax 01-000-41-00-4100 a. This line-item is based on our population, and estimates of state revenues put forth by the Illinois Municipal League. The most recent estimate from IML was $88 per capita, even though recent numbers indicate the FY 13 year-end number could be near$92 per capita. At $88 per capita, we would expect to see $1.48m. We have budgeted for $1.55m for each year going forward(no increase) on the off-chance that the State decides to divert this revenue stream. The FY 13 amount projected amount is higher than the $88 per capita because the City typically receives a higher amount than the per capita estimates (from back payments, timing of estimate period v. our budgeting period, etc.). R9)Local use tax 01-000-41-00-4105 a. This line-item is based on our population, and estimates of state revenues put forth by the Illinois Municipal League. The most recent estimate from IML was $15.20 per capita or about $257,000 annually. We have assumed marginal in this revenue stream throughout the five year budget proposal. R10) Building permits 01-000-42-00-4210 a. Revenue figures within this line-item will equal the exact cost of the Building Code Official's salary, the Building Department Receptionist's salary, the cost of part-time property maintenance inspectors and outsourced inspections. During the year, once those costs are met, all building permit revenue will be transferred into a capital fund for the use of one-time capital expenses. This prevents us from using one-item revenues for long-term operating costs in the future. The "surplus"building permit revenues are 20 currently denoted in the City wide capital fund budget under line-item 23-000-42-00- 4210. R11) Transfer from municipal building 01-000-49-00-4916 a. Because we transferred money from the general fund to close out the municipal building impact fee fund, the general fund will be repaid with collected municipal building impact fees. As discussed above, the 1999 City Hall construction was the reason for the deficit within the municipal building impact fee fund. E 1)Salaries All departments, multiple#s a. As stated in the big picture narrative,we have budgeted for the cost of a 2%net raise for all employees in FY 14, but nothing in FY 15 and beyond. The line-items reflect an average gross increase of 5%,but that amount is offset by the move to a 15%PPO or 12%HMO health insurance contribution to all employees starting on May 1. E2)Health, life, dental and vision insurance All departments, multiple#s a. We assume a 10% increase in health insurance costs each year through FY 16, and 6% increases in FY 17 and FY 18. E3)Utilities, commodities and contracts All departments, multiple#s a. Graduated increases in gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and simple contractual services are not based on any particular estimate of the details of the line-item, except where specifically noted in this budget section. From a conservative budgeting principle, we are purposefully trying to overestimate costs to hedge on unanticipated price increases on everything from gasoline to office cleaning. E4)Telecommunications All departments, multiple#s a. We have allocated Comcast internet costs evenly between all departments, resulting in moderate increases in most departments. E5)Training and Travel All departments, multiple#s a. The same training and conference levels are proposed as last year. Department heads have been asked to budget for attendance at one national level or state conference per year to keep up to date with the latest trends in management and government. Increases in individual line-items reflect this request of the department heads. E6)Part-time salaries (Administration) 01-110-50-00-5015 a. This line-item contemplates continuation of the NIU MPA internship program through FY 18. Each intern is a two-year commitment, with Mr. Weckbach's internship term carrying through FY 14. E7)Elected Official—Group Health Insurance 01-110-52-00-5223 E8)Elected Official—Group Life Insurance 01-110-52-00-5236 E9)Elected Official—Dental Insurance 01-110-52-00-5237 E10) Elected Official—Vision Insurance 01-110-52-00-5238 a. We have conservatively budgeted through FY 18 by assuming every incumbent elected official would win re-election and would retain health insurance. 21 El 1) Kendall County Paratransit (Administration) 01-110-54-00-5473 a. Due to budget constraints, we are proposing to cut Kendall Area Transit funding as of May 1, 2013. The final invoice for service through April 30, 2013 would be paid for in FY 14, which is why we've budgeted for $15,000. We propose to cut this based on the participation levels of Yorkville residents. In 2012, 106 Yorkville residents were registered with KAT. In 2011 and parts of 2010, 312 Yorkville residents were registered. Throughout all of 2012, 3,533 unique rides were given in Yorkville (just under 300 per month average). Finally, as this is a County-wide service, we feel that the most equitable form of funding this service would be for the entire County to equally fund this, and not the current funding format where Yorkville residents are paying as a County resident and as a City resident. E12) Auditing services (Finance) 01-120-54-00-5414 a. Budgeted amounts for the next four fiscal years reflect the five year contract recently signed with Lauterbach and Amen. E13) Printing and duplicating (Finance) 01-120-54-00-5430 a. Increase in this line-item is due to a reallocation of printing and copying costs between the Administration and Finance departments. E14) Salaries—Police Officers 01-210-50-00-5010 a. As discussed above,no police hires are proposed through FY 18. This will be re- evaluated each year based on police activity data and available funds. Yorkville currently averages —1.5 officers per 1,000 residents, which is below the regional target of 1.8 officers per 1,000 resident, but is within the regional average: i. Aurora— 1.66 per 1,000 residents ii. Batavia— 1.44 iii. Carpentersville - 1.97 iv. East Dundee - 3.59 v. Elburn - 1.5 vi. Elgin- 1.67 vii. Geneva- 1.63 viii. Gilberts - 1.29 ix. Hampshire - 1.93 x. Montgomery - 1.36 xi. North Aurora— 2.02 xii. Sleepy Hollow- 1.88 xiii. South Elgin- 1.45 xiv. St Charles - 1.61 xv. Sugar Grove - 1.54 xvi. West Chicago - 1.81 xvii. West Dundee - 2.37 xviii. Winfield- 2.02 E15) Part-time Salaries (Police) 01-210-50-00-5015 a. As discussed in the FY 13 budget narrative,this line-item allows for some flexibility for the Police Chief in staffing between part-time officers, community service officers, and cadets. 22 E16) Vehicle &Equipment chargeback(Police) 01-210-54-00-5422 a. As discussed above,we are proposing an accelerated replacement of squad cars with the intent to get on a 60,000 mile replacement schedule. All of the expenses for the squad cars are located in the newly created vehicle and equipment fund, as they are a capital cost. However, to adequately portray the cost of operations of the police department(and all other departments), we are showing the gap between the cost of the police cars and the available impact fees in the vehicle and equipment fund as a chargeback expense in this line-item. E17) Part-time salaries (Com. Dev.) 01-220-50-00-5015 a. The FY 14 budget amount will cover two part-time code enforcement officers at $15 per hour for 1,000 hours per year. For FY 13,we found great success in managing mowing inspections with one part-time code enforcement officer. E18) Inspections (Com. Dev.) 01-220-54-00-5459 a. With the current expertise of the Code Official, we do not plan on needing any outsourced inspections in FY 14 and beyond. However, we budgeted for$10,000 per year in case inspections pick up dramatically and to cover scheduling conflicts. E19) Economic Development(Com. Dev.) 01-220-54-00-5486 a. The City established funding to the YEDC around 2000, and the amount hasn't changed since. The City's current commitment to the YEDC expires in FY 13. Given the recent and historical success in attracting businesses,we are proposing a three year commitment to the YEDC with an inflation component to our commitment. E20) Salaries &Wages (Streets) 01-410-50-00-5010 a. The increase in FY 14 is caused by a reallocation of Director Muse's salary. In prior years, his salary was allocated equally between the Water and Sewer Departments (nothing out of Streets). We feel that it is most equitable for his salary to be split between Water, Sewer, and Streets equally. E21) Vehicle & Equipment Chargeback(Streets) 01-410-54-00-5422 a. The explanation for this line-item is the same as the parallel line-item in the Police Department. E22) Sidewalk program(Streets) 01-410-54-00-5454 a. Per a discussion at the Public Works Committee,we have proposed suspending the 50150 program(housed out of this line-item) due to non-participation and replace it with a proactive sidewalk replacement program(100% City-funded). This new program is housed in the city wide capital fund. E23) Garbage services—senior subsidy 01-540-54-00-5441 a. For budgetary reasons, we propose to eliminate the senior discount on garbage services by FY 16. This would be accomplished through a graduated elimination of the discount over FY 14 and FY 15. Specifically, we propose to charge seniors 33% of the price of garbage in FY 14, 66% in FY 15, and 100% in FY 16. Approximately 650 households take advantage of the senior discount on garbage services. 23 E24) Leaf pickup 01-540-54-00-5443 a. For budgetary and duplication of services reasons, we propose to eliminate City leaf pickup in FY 14. Free bagged leaf pickup is available through Advanced Disposal through the end of November every year as part of the current Advanced Disposal contract(through FY 17). City leaf pickup takes the majority of the streets, sewer and water department employees' time for two weeks in November. As part of the cancellation of this service, the City would be able to sell $15,000 worth of equipment (leaf vacuum). Brush pickup is proposed to remain. E25) Amusement tax rebate (Admin. Services) 01-640-54-00-5439 a. As part of the Countryside redevelopment project incentives, the City is refunding a portion of the amusement tax to developer. E26) KenCom(Admin. Services) 01-640-54-00-5449 a. The City's contribution to KenCom begins in FY 15. Based on our estimate of a 10% annual increase in KenCom's budget, our contribution will be around$150,000 in FY 15. For every $1 increase in KenCom's budget, the City absorbs an additional $0.17,based on last year's call volume proportions between agencies. As a point of reference, the recent KenCom lease and buildout contributions to the Kendall County board increased the City's estimated FY 15 contribution by $34,000. E27) Information Tech. Services (Admin Svcs) 01-640-54-00-5450 a. This line-item covers all consultant costs and equipment purchases for IT in all departments. We are still recommended outsource of IT services, as consultant costs currently make up only$30,000 of the entire line-item. E28) Special engineering services 01-640-54-00-5453 a. This line-item will contain engineering services invoices for projects which the City would not be able to complete with in-house staff. This line-item helps us to analyze the in-house v. outsource engineering debate . E29) Engineering services 01-640-54-00-5465 a. This line-item covers all normal, outsourced engineering costs per our contract with EEI. We contemplate outsourcing engineering functions through FY 18. E30) Contingencies 01-640-70-00-7799 a. The $50,000 budgeted in each of the next five fiscal years represents less than 1% of the yearly expenditures in the general fund. City policy states this line-item should be 3%to 5% of yearly expenditures in the general fund. We have not funded this line-item to that percentage in several years, and even the $50,000 is greater than the amount budgeted and spent in the past few fiscal years. E31) Transfer to Municipal Building 01-640-99-00-9916 a. Per the discussion above and the recommendations from our auditors, we are transferring money into the municipal building impact fee fund to offset the ongoing fund deficit. This will allow us to close the municipal building impact fee fund. Because the original source of the deficit in that fund was due to the construction and renovation of the current 24 City Hall, all municipal building impact fees will now be deposited into the city wide capital fund before being transferred to the general fund to offset the general fund's payment to close out the municipal building impact fee fund. E32) Transfer to Sewer 01-640-99-00-9952 a. This amount offsets the 2011 Rob Roy Sewer refinancing bond payments due each year, and is sourced from non-home rule sales tax proceeds. E33) Transfer to Parks &Recreation 01-640-99-00-9979 a. The increase in the FY 14 transfer amount is due to the closure of the REC Center fund, which we've folded into the Parks and Recreation fund(79) for this year. The small picture—other funds Fox Hill SSA R1)Property Taxes—Fox Hill SSA 11-000-40-00-4011 a. We are proposing increases in the annual HOA dues,beginning in FY 15, due to one- time projects (outlined below) and establishment of a 100% fund balance for this fund. Current budget proposal shows an increase in annual dues from $17 per year to $38 per year. E 1)Trail maintenance 11-111-54-00-5417 a. The interior trails of the subdivision need to be sealcoated in FY 15 and FY 16. We propose to fund half of the work with the fund balance in the Fox Hill SSA fund (currently $15,000) and have the other half paid for by the residents of the subdivision over an 8-year period. The proposal would require the City to deficit fund the second half of the work and increase the HOA dues to $38 per year(up from$17), starting in FY 15. The HOA dues would be reanalyzed after the fund balance reaches 100% of normal annual maintenance costs (expected to be 2022). E2)Outside Repair and Maintenance 11-111-54-00-5495 a. This line-item is for annual ongoing maintenance expenses related to trail patching, entrance sign repainting, entrance area landscaping, and tree trimming all common areas. Sunflower Estates SSA R1)Property Taxes— Sunflower SSA 12-000-40-00-4012 a. We are proposing increases in the annual HOA dues,beginning in FY 15, due to one- time projects (outlined below) and establishment of a 100% fund balance for this fund. Current budget proposal shows an increase in annual dues from $64 per year to $150 per year. E1)Pond maintenance 12-112-54-00-5416 a. The City authorized a detailed inspection of the three detention basins in Sunflower Estates in October 2012. Two basins were given an"F" grade and the third basin a"C" grade. Based on our analysis, all three ponds need to be fixed in order to maintain adequate detention basin storage. One option is to dredge the ponds at a cost of 25 $110,000. For half the price, we can naturalize all three basins. We recommend naturalizing the basins due to cost considerations. Naturalizing the basins will also improve the immediate environment (naturalization prevents mosquito populations and cleans stormwater). If the City chooses to dredge the ponds, the HOA fees would have to be $250 annually. Similar to the Fox Hill proposal, we propose to fund the basin naturalization through exhausting the fund balance in the Sunflower SSA fund, and then deficit funding the remaining $45,000 worth of work. The deficit would be repaid over a 10-year period, with a reanalysis of the HOA dues expected in 2025. E2)Outside Repair and Maintenance 12-112-54-00-5495 a. This line-item is for annual ongoing maintenance expenses related to entrance sign repainting, tree trimming and landscape planting replacement. Motor Fuel Tax Fund R1)State Grants 15-000-41-00-4170 a. This line-item contains the reimbursement from the state for the downtown parking lot construction. We expect to complete the project in calendar year 2013, with reimbursement coming in FY 14. We moved the reimbursement amount to this line-item (and away from the "Reimb-Old Jail parking lot" line-item) to mimic similar line-items in other funds. R2)Illinois Jobs Now Proceeds 15-000-41-00-4172 a. The City received a third of five supplemental MFT disbursements in FY 13. Under prior announcements from the Governor, we should get two additional disbursements of $73,000 over the next two fiscal years. However, the fourth disbursement from the State has not been announced yet and past correspondence with high level state officials has cast doubt on the future disbursements. Thus, we removed the disbursements from last year's budget, and we propose the same for FY 14. If new disbursements are announced, we will add them into the budget. El)Patching 15-155-56-00-5632 a. This line-item represents our annual MFT patching project. Last year, we patched Kennedy Road and the year before that was Game Farm Road. We propose to continue this summer-fall RFP process as part of our new"Road to Better Roads"program. The recommended road each year will be chosen by staff, based on the data given to us in the pavement management program software. As discussed in the big picture narrative, our recommended target for the next 5 years is to spend$1 million per year on road improvements and preventative maintenance. E2)Road to Better Roads Program 15-155-60-00-6025 a. This line-item represents the MFT portion of the Road to Better Roads Program. The funding amounts recommended within the MFT budget are selected to draw down the MFT fund balance to zero by FY 18. E3)Game Farm Road Project 15-155-60-00-6073 a. This line-item covers easement and property acquisition for the Game Farm Road project. The remainder of the Game Farm Road project expenses are in the city wide capital fund. 26 E4)Route 47 expansion 15-155-60-00-6079 a. Per the City's intergovernmental agreement with IDOT, MFT related Route 47 project expenses will be spread over the next ten fiscal years. The amount budgeted in this line- item represents the actual project expenses, as currently approved by IDOT. E5)Cannonball LAFO project 15-155-60-00-6089 a. This line-item represents a mill and overlay of Cannonball Trail from Amanda Lane to Blackberry Shore Lane, at a total cost of$435,000. The City received $300,000 in Federal STP funds for this project, which will commence in 2015. City wide Capital R1)State Grants—ITEP 23-000-41-00-4178 a. This line-item shows the revenue to be received from the state for the Kennedy Road bike path project. For budget purposes, we have shown a net cost to the City of $245,000 for the project, even though private fund raising should cover that entire amount and we have the opportunity to apply for the second federal grant after Phase I and II engineering are complete to halve the construction cost of the project. R2)Building Permits 23-000-42-00-4210 a. This line-item represents the building permit revenue above and beyond the costs associated with the building department employees. We are using this incremental revenue to help fund one-time capital projects in this fund. R3)Development Fees—CW Capital 23-000-42-00-4214 a. All development fees received are coded into this line-item and used on one-time capital expenses. The City used to code these revenues to the general fund and use them to offset general operations cost. When these revenues tanked, the general fund was left with a large structural deficit. R4)Development Fees—Municipal Building 23-000-42-00-4218 a. As stated in the budget narrative,we closed out the municipal building impact fee fund by transferring almost $600,000 to this fund to offset its deficit from the construction of City Hall in 1999. Going forward, these impact fees will be coded into the City wide capital fund. R5)Bond proceeds 23-000-49-00-4900 a. This line-item represents the revenues from bond proceeds for the Game Farm Road project, set to begin in earnest in FY 16. R6)Loan proceeds 23-000-49-00-4905 a. This line-item represents the Kendall County payment of the River Road Bridge project invoices. E1)Engineering Services 23-230-54-00-5465 a. This line-item represents subdivision/infrastructure inspections that the City is obligated to perform as part of a development agreement, or because a developer has paid the 27 engineering inspection fee at time of final plat. This is the line-item to watch in the ongoing analysis of in-house v. outsourced engineering department. If this line-item becomes too large ($200,000+) it will likely be advantageous to have an in-house engineering department. We do not think that will occur in the next 5 years, however. E2)Road resurfacing 23-230-60-00-6015 a. This line-item represents the second half of the Road to Better Roads funding. Between this line-item and the line-item in the MFT budget, we have $1 million in funding projected. E3)Sidewalk construction 23-230-60-00-6041 a. As stated in the Streets Department narrative, we are proposing to cease the 50150 sidewalk program due to non-use, and replace it with a City initiated sidewalk replacement program. Instead of doing small areas throughout the City, we will take a lump sum of funding and replace entire blocks in the City each year. Contrary to how we select roads for rehab, sidewalks will be completed on a worst-first basis, as there is no cost efficiency to be achieved through data collection. E4)Route 71 (Rt 47 to Orchard Rd)project 23-230-60-00-6058 E5)US 34 (Rt 47 to Orchard Rd)project 23-230-60-00-6059 a. The City has approved memorandum of understandings with IDOT for these projects, and there is a good chance both of these projects will be completed within the next five years. E6)Game Farm Road Project 23-230-60-00-6073 a. We expect construction to begin in FY 16, and to finish in FY 17. The expenses shown in the budget are the net cost of the project to the City. The entire project is expected to be around$7 million, and the City will receive around $2.5 million in federal funds. E7)Kennedy Road Bike Trail 23-230-60-00-6094 a. This line-item contains the net expenses from the construction of the trail. We are assuming that the City will pay for $245,000 worth of the project, which assumes that the Push for the Path group raises no future money. Reimbursement monies received from Push for the Path will be recorded in revenue line item 23-000-48-00-4860. E8)Principal Payment (2015 bond) 23-230-81-00-8000 E9)Interest Payment(2015 bond) 23-230-81-00-8050 a. This line-item contains the debt service for a 20-year bond associated with the Game Farm Road project. The high cost of the project and compressed construction schedule does not make this project feasible without bond financing. E10) Princ. pmt. (Kendall Co. Loan, River Rd Br.) 23-230-97-00-8000 a. This line-item represents the City's 6-year payback of River Road Bridge expenses to Kendall County at 0% interest. Vehicle and Equipment Fund R1)Development fees—Police Capital 25-000-42-00-4215 28 R2)Engineering Capital Fee 25-000-42-00-4218 R3)Development fees—PW Capital 25-000-42-00-4219 R4)Development fees—Park Capital 25-000-42-00-4220 a. The above line-items all contain impact fees generated at time of building permit, or upfront payments at time of final plat. We have generally assumed that we will have 65 new housing starts in FY 14. Each of these impact fees have their own corresponding expense line-items departmentalized in this fund, and are tracked through a separate fund balance calculation at the bottom of the fund. As a general reminder, fund consolidation was a recommendation from our auditors. R5)Seized vehicle proceeds 25-000-43-00-4340 a. This line-item contains all revenues the City receives from seized vehicles. For purposes of a fund balance calculation, this money is used by the Police department in their"Police Capital" line-items within this fund, and is tracked as part of the Police capital fund balance. R6)Police Chargeback 25-000-44-00-4420 R7)Public Works Chargeback 25-000-44-00-4421 a. As discussed in the general fund line-item narrative,these line-items represent transfers from the general fund to cover the gap between vehicle purchases and available funds in the respective departments. E1)Vehicles (Police Capital) 25-205-60-00-6070 a. As stated in the general fund narrative, we are proposing to purchase 3 squad cars per year, to maintain a 60,000 mile replacement schedule. To reiterate, once a squad car reaches 60,000 miles it has hit its peak trade-in value to future maintenance cost ratio, and it is most advantageous for us to trade the vehicle in. E2)Principal pmt (PW 185 Wolf Street bldg.) 25-215-92-00-8000 E3)Interest pmt(PW185 Wolf Street bldg.) 25-215-92-00-8050 E4)Principal pmt(Parks 185 Wolf Street bldg.) 25-225-92-00-8000 E5)Interest pmt (Parks 185 Wolf Street bldg.) 25-225-92-00-8050 a. These line-items cover the annual purchase installment payments to the property seller for the Public Works south building. Debt Service Fund R1)Property taxes—2005A Bond 42-000-40-00-4006 a. This line-item represents the non-abated property taxes associated with the in-town road program bond, in the amount and duration approved by City Council as part of the Rob Roy sewer bond refinancing package two years ago. These property taxes are scheduled to be eliminated in FY 18. Water fund R1)Property taxes—2007A Bond 51-000-40-00-4007 a. This line-item represents the non-abated property taxes associated with the 2007A bond, in the amount and duration approved by City Council as part of the Rob Roy sewer bond 29 refinancing package two years ago. These property taxes are scheduled to be eliminated in FY 16. R2)Water Sales 51-000-44-00-4424 a. The current water rate graduated increases expire after FY 14. As part of a separate comprehensive water ordinance revision to be rolled out over the next few months, we will propose a new 5-year water rate schedule. We anticipate that a 1.5% annual increase in the water rate base will be necessary to sustain water operations. R3)Water infrastructure fee 51-000-44-00-4440 a. As discussed in the "items of note" section above, we propose to reduce the current water infrastructure fee from$8.25 per month per user to $4 per month per user. R4)Water connection fees 51-000-44-00-4450 a. For FY 14, we expect 65 new housing starts. Each subdivision has its own water connection fee amount, depending on when the subdivision was annexed. R5)Rental income 51-000-48-00-4820 a. This line-item contains rental and lease fees from various cellular and internet antennae on City water towers. R6)Transfer from Sewer 51-00-49-00-4952 a. This line-item represents the transfer from the Sewer Fund to offset half of the cost of the 2005C bond. E1)Bad debt 51-510-54-00-5499 a. This line-item represents non-payment of utility bills by customers. The City does lien properties and perform service shutoffs on non-payment, but still incurs bad debt until those amounts are paid. This non-payment represents 0.75% of the total amount billed, and is considered very low. E2)Route 47 expansion 51-510-60-00-6079 a. This line-item represents all water related utility costs associated with the Route 47 expansion project. These amounts are scheduled in equal annual payments for 10 years. Sewer Fund R1)Property taxes—2004B Bond 52-000-40-00-4009 a. This line-item represents the non-abated property taxes associated with the 2004B bond, in the amount and duration approved by City Council as part of the Rob Roy sewer bond refinancing package two years ago. These property taxes are scheduled to be eliminated in FY 15. R2)SW Connection Fees—Rob Roy 52-000-44-00-4457 R3)Sewer infrastructure fees 52-000-44-00-4460 a. The final Rob Roy sewer agreement payment from Pulte Homes (Centex)was received in FY 13. As discussed in last year's budget narrative, the City is forced to fill the revenue 30 hole associated with the expiration of this agreement. We propose to do that by a $4 per month per user sewer infrastructure fee. R4)Transfer from General 52-000-49-00-4901 a. This line-item represents the non-home rule sales tax transfers from the general fund, used to offset the 2011 Refinancing Bond. E1)Route 47 expansion 52-520-60-00-6079 a. This line-item represents all sewer related utility costs associated with the Route 47 expansion project. These amounts are scheduled in equal annual payments for 10 years. E2)Lennar—Raintree sewer recapture a. Due to various issues in the subdivision, we propose to hold payment on this recapture payment until further notice. E3)Windett Ridge sewer recapture 52-520-75-00-7501 a. Due to various issues in the subdivision, the City does not expect to make the sewer recapture payment for the next five fiscal years. Land-cash fund R1)RTP Grant—Clark Park 72-000-41-00-4174 a. This grant was awarded to the City in FY 13, and we expect construction and reimbursement to be completed in FY 14. R2)OSLAD Grant—Riverfront Grant 72-000-41-00-4175 a. This grant has not been awarded to the City yet. We made the first cut of grant review, and we are using this line-item as a placeholder for planning purposes in case the grant application is approved. If approved,we would expect to complete the park in FY 16. R3)Transfer from Vehicle & Equipment 72-000-49-00-4925 a. In FY 10, the City Council accepted a cash payout from Lennar in exchange for transfer of certain subdivision improvement obligations to the City. The City has completed most of the infrastructure improvements. The remaining improvements for Raintree Park C are coded in a separate expense line-item in FY 18. E1)Clark Park 72-720-60-00-6044 a. This grant was awarded to the City in FY 13, and we expect construction and reimbursement to be completed in FY 14. E2)Riverfront Park 72-720-60-00-6045 a. This grant has not been awarded to the City yet. We made the first cut of grant review, and we are using this line-item as a placeholder for planning purposes in case the grant application is approved. If approved, we would expect to complete the park in FY16. E3)Grande Reserve Park A 72-720-60-00-6046 E4)Grande Reserve Park B 72-720-60-00-6047 31 a. Grande Reserve Park B must be started by May 2014, and Park A by January 2015, and each must be completed within 2 years of the start of construction,pursuant to OSLAD grant agreements for Riemenschneider Park and Raintree Park B. Parks A and B were used as the local match in both of those OSLAD grant projects. Part of the requirement for use of the deeds as a local match is that they must be improved by a certain date. Parks and Recreation Fund (79) R1)Transfer from General 79-000-49-00-4901 a. The large increase from FY 13 to FY 14 is due primarily to the REC Center closure. Whatever deficit is left at the end of the operation of the REC Center must be closed out by another fund. Because the REC Center was an arm of the Recreation Department, we felt it was easiest to show the initial transfer to cover the REC Center deficit out of the recreation department budget("Transfer to RECREATION CENTER" line-item#79- 795-99-00-9980). Because the Parks and Recreation fund is covering the REC Center ending deficit, and the Parks and Recreation fund receives a general fund transfer, we must make up the hole in this fund with a larger general fund transfer. E1)Outside Repair and Maintenance (Parks) 79-790-54-00-5495 a. The increase in this line-item is due to an aging vehicle fleet. At this time, it is still advantageous for us to pay higher repair costs, rather than replace older vehicles with new vehicles. E2)Salaries &Wages (Recreation) 79-795-50-00-5010 a. This line-item is higher than in FY 13 because are proposing to fold the REC Center facility manager back into the recreation department in a recreation coordinator capacity. Even with this move, the Recreation department will have less employees and less total salary than in FY 07, prior to the REC Center. E3)Outside Repair and Maintenance (Recreation) 79-795-54-00-5495 a. This line-item covers renovations to the Old Post Office and other office buildings to bring them into compliance with ADA standards and recreational uses as a result of moving certain recreation programming out of the REC Center. E4)Property tax payment 79-795-54-00-5497 a. The final half-year property tax payment from the REC Center will be paid in FY 15. E5)Transfer to REC Center 79-795-99-00-9980 a. As stated in the narrative for the "Transfer from General" line-item above,we decided to show the REC Center budget deficit being covered by the Recreation Department because we thought it was the most natural location in the budget. REC Center Fund R1)All revenue line-items Multiple#s a. All revenue line-items contemplate a very conservative revenue total for the final two months of operation (May 2013 and June 2013). 32 E1)A11 expense line-items Multiple#s a. All expense line-items contemplate a full operation the final two months. Countryside TIF R1)Property taxes—Countryside TIF 87-000-40-00-4087 a. This line-item contemplates finish of the theater in 2013, and a full property tax payment in FY 16 (summer 2015 payment). E1)TIF Incentive 87-870-54-00-5425 a. The Kendall Crossing TIF agreement calls for payout of the remainder of the TIF proceeds at time of theater opening. We had originally communicated that amount in early 2012 as around $1.8 million. Due to timing of the construction,the amount is likely to be around$1.2 million. The City committed to a full $2 million incentive, with the gap between TIF proceeds and the $2 million to be made up by an amusement tax rebate to the developer. Because the City is on the hook for the full $2 million, we think it is prudent to paying down that incentive as soon as possible. Therefore, we are recommending to pay out $1.8 million to the developer at the end of 2013 when the theater opens, regardless of how much remains of the TIF proceeds. E2)Principal Payment(2005 Bond) 87-870-80-00-8000 E3)Interest Payment(2005 Bond) 87-870-80-00-8050 a. The 2005 bond ends five years before the expiration of the TIF. Because of the development setbacks on this property caused by the recession, we recommend refinancing this bond to improve cash flow in the near term and allow the property a few more years to fully buildout. E4)Principal Payment (2013 Bond) 87-870-93-00-8000 E5)Interest Payment(2013 Bond) 87-870-93-00-8050 a. With the siting of the movie theater and expected buildout of outlots in the development, we propose refinancing the existing TIF bond to stretch the debt service payments to the end of the TIF district. Currently, the existing TIF bond is set to expire in 2024 and the TIF district expires in 2029. The refinancing would also decrease the yearly annual debt service payment, which will limit the City's difference between property taxes generated for the next few years (currently, almost $0) and the debt service payment. Downtown TIF R1)Property taxes—Downtown TIF 88-000-40-00-4088 a. Property values in the TIF have decreased during the recession, which has taken a hit on our annual TIF revenues. However, the recent construction and renovation in the downtown will manifest itself in the next two fiscal years. All new construction and renovation projects will result in a minimal TIF net revenue amount, as we've committed between 75%to 85% of the annual TIF increment to the developers as incentives. Thus, we have not budgeted for a large increase in property tax revenues—rather,we will wait until they materialize and budget from that point. E1)Project Costs 88-880-60-00-6000 33 a. This line-item is for City-initiated projects within the TIF districts. This can be anything from streetscape aesthetic improvements, to building repairs on public buildings. E2)TIF Incentive Payouts 88-880-54-00-5425 a. This line-item is for the annual TIF payouts to developers with approved TIF agreements. Because we have not increased the TIF property tax revenue line-item, we are not budgeting for the expense either. E3)Route 47 expansion 88-880-60-00-6079 a. This line-item represents various improvements within the TIF district associated with the Route 47 expansion project. These amounts are scheduled in equal annual payments for 10 years. Cash Flow—Surplus (Deficit) This section of the budget continues from last year, and shows the surpluses and deficits for every fund in the entire budget. Through a change in budgeting principles, this section can now be used to see the City's "overall budget"performance. In fact, in this memo we refer to the "total budget" or "overall budget" instead of cash-flow, which was the term we used last year to describe overall budget performance. A few years ago, simply adding up all the funds' revenues and expenses would not have given you an accurate view of whether we were taking in more than we were spending (or vice versa); we can do that now. The total at the bottom of the column for each fiscal year is the basis for whether the City's overall budget is running a surplus or deficit. As stated in the big picture narrative, we are recommending four years of total budget deficit. In FY 14, we are hampered by the payment of Countryside TIF funds, and the closure of the REC Center fund and municipal building impact fee fund. In FY 15, we show a total budget surplus of$3.5 million,but that is buoyed by the in-flux of$4 million in Game Farm Road bond proceeds in the city wide capital fund. In FY 16, we show a total budget deficit of more than $4.6 million, but that is again a result of spending down Game Farm Road bond proceeds (more than $4.3 million in the city wide capital fund). In FY 17 and 18, deficits in the general fund caused by large amounts of capital projects and very conservative revenue projections ultimately drag down the entire budget. As we stated earlier in this memo, these amounts are highly speculative and variable. Cash Flow—Fund Balance This section of the budget is carried over from last year too, and is a parallel section to the "Cash Flow—Surplus (Deficit)" section above. The only difference between that section and this one is that this section adds in the fund balance amounts for each fund at the end of the fiscal year. As we discussed in the big picture narrative, the general fund fund balance is relatively stable over the next five fiscal years, remaining at $1.9 million in FY 18. The water fund fund balance equivalency remains stable, even with the reduction in the water infrastructure fee. The sewer fund fund balance equivalency is drawn down over the next five fiscal years. The total at the bottom of each column represents the City's overall aggregate fund balance. As we stated above and in last year's budget narrative, $3 million is the threshold for severe fiscal problems. We estimate to be just below $4 million in FY 18. 34 Cash Flow—Actual Cash on Hand at FYE This is a new section, which shows actual cash balances at FYE 11-12 and our best estimate of cash on hand as of April 30 of each projected fiscal year, based on the budget proposal. If our estimates were 100% correct(they will not be), these figures would show up in the statement of net assets in the City's audited financial statements. Allocated Items—Aggregated This section carries forward from last year, and contains aggregate costs from all departments, including liability insurance, employee health, dental and vision insurance,property taxes, non-abated property taxes, building permit revenue, employee salaries, Route 47 construction costs, etc. 35 United City of Yorkville Revenues by Category Fiscal Year 2014 Other Inter- Licenses& Fines& Charges Investment Reimb- Miscel- Land Financing Fund FUND Taxes governmental Permits Forfeits for Services Earnings ursements laneous Cash Sources Total General Fund 9,359,104 1,998,200 193,000 180,200 1,181,235 6,500 75,000 11,000 5,250 13,009,489 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax - 942,000 - - - 2,000 - - - 944,000 Parks and Recreation - 240,000 200 223,000 - 1,765,504 2,228,704 Land Cash 96,000 - - - 20,500 50,000 166,500 Countryside TIF - - 1,550 - - 1,550 Downtown TIF 35,000 350 35,350 Fox Hill SSA 3,786 - - - 3,786 Sunflower SSA 7,531 - - 7,531 Debt Service Fund 328,179 1,000 300 - 329,479 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building - - - - - - - 573,374 573,374 Vehicle&Equipment - 49,275 8,850 150,150 475 50,000 1,000 - 259,750 City-Wide Capital - 327,600 20,250 - 669,120 250 - 126,441 435,401 1,579,062 Enterprise Funds Water 43,027 - - 2,458,740 2,000 54,336 82,988 2,641,090 Sewer 114,940 1,097,560 5,500 - 1,137,220 2,355,220 Recreation Center - - 61,000 - - 556,957 617,957 Library Funds Library Operations 670,415 22,200 9,300 14,000 1,300 9,250 52,174 778,639 Library Debt Service 771,763 - - - - 200 - - 771,963 Library Capital - - 20,000 - - 20 - - - 20,020 TOTAL REVENUES 11,333,745 3,386,000 283,525 198,350 5,871,805 20,645 125,000 425,027 20,500 4,658,867 26,323,464 36 United City of Yorkville Expenditures by Category Fiscal Year 2014 Other Contractual Capital Developer Debt Financing Fund FUND Salaries Benefits Services Supplies Outlay Contingencies Commitments Service Uses Total General Fund 3,583,218 2,181,806 3,830,760 292,110 - 50,000 3,777,183 13,715,077 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax - - 7,500 219,556 1,151,400 - - 1,378,456 Parks and Recreation 782,469 332,398 227,280 291,650 - 556,957 2,190,754 Land Cash - - - - 89,000 - 89,000 Countryside TIF 1,802,375 - 285,788 2,088,163 Downtown TIF 15,350 30,000 - 45,350 Fox Hill SSA 7,500 - 7,500 Sunflower SSA 14,985 - 14,985 Debt Service Fund 375 328,179 328,554 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building - - - - - Vehicle&Equipment 18,167 2,000 140,000 82,295 50,000 292,462 City-Wide Capital - - 50,000 - 1,287,000 83,333 5,250 1,425,583 Enterprise Funds Water 346,131 191,042 497,450 301,873 139,094 1,172,802 - 2,648,392 Sewer 192,000 111,144 80,950 83,206 66,773 1,968,119 82,988 2,585,179 Recreation Center 20,000 - 114,250 16,239 - - - 150,489 Library Funds Library Operations 447,540 190,977 109,049 21,250 - 768,816 Library Debt Service - - - - 771,763 771,763 Library Capital - - 3,500 35,350 - - - 38,850 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,371,358 3,007,367 6,779,491 1,263,233 2,903,266 50,000 - 4,692,279 4,472,378 28,5395372 37 United City of Yorkville Fund Balance History Fiscal Years 2011 - 2018 FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FUND Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected General Fund (271,900) 1,270,623 1,596,094 3,445,724 2,740,136 3,370,126 3,871,468 2,417,364 1,857,386 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax 640,399 924,857 465,255 1,055,589 621,133 469,021 271,653 48,885 0 Parks and Recreation 231,558 280,065 185,635 293,043 330,993 252,433 257,029 263,445 268,088 Land Cash (388,625) (294,778) (172,534) 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) Fox Industrial TIF 569,790 - - - - - - - - Countryside TIF 2,178,550 1,877,872 1,578,277 1,573,929 (512,684) (634,131) (655,579) (677,026) (698,474) Downtown TIF 209,760 257,953 264,867 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 Fox Hill SSA 17,942 17,071 16,719 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) Sunflower SSA 11,922 12,188 10,007 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) Debt Service Fund 8,653 87,510 8,925 10,686 11,611 12,536 (26,386) (69,246) 60,156 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building (587,024) (579,374) (575,774) (573,374) - - - - - Vehicle&Equipment 355,133 354,595 62,123 129,270 96,558 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 City-Wide Capital 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 Enterprise Funds * Water 825,261 1,300,837 642,452 1,379,272 1,371,971 1,359,330 1,329,770 1,301,128 1,286,117 Sewer 2,377,831 3,003,537 2,625,761 2,895,977 2,666,019 2,186,765 1,911,313 1,620,209 1,310,940 Recreation Center (195,087) (220,001) (367,521) (467,468) 0 0 0 0 0 Library Funds Library Operations 317,336 388,831 370,330 400,154 409,977 417,448 413,659 402,047 407,149 Library Debt Service - (1,821) - 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Library Capital - 6,794 - 18,830 - - - - - Totals 6,302,151 8,767,955 7,043,116 10,905,005 8,689,097 12,115,415 7,450,277 5,549,684 4,695,003 * Fund Balance Equivalent 38 United City of Yorkville Revenue Budget Summary -All Funds Fiscal Years 2011-2018 FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FUND Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected General Fund 11,517,961 12,511,852 12,311,109 13,028,337 13,009,489 13,149,787 13,330,233 13,491,732 13,720,472 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax 687,269 560,598 454,547 525,743 944,000 456,000 455,500 460,500 460,500 Parks and Recreation 1,367,262 1,199,608 1,451,447 1,419,136 2,228,704 1,573,311 1,655,908 1,680,269 1,702,344 Land Cash 474,639 430,767 420,500 452,106 166,500 23,000 23,000 423,000 23,000 Fox Industrial TIF 228,359 259,327 - - - - - - - Countryside TIF 9,506 6,906 6,500 3,100 1,550 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Downtown TIF 75,362 67,933 70,150 40,330 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 Fox Hill SSA 19,894 3,793 3,786 3,796 3,786 8,536 8,536 8,536 8,536 Sunflower SSA 13,871 7,537 7,531 7,540 7,531 17,416 17,416 17,416 17,416 Debt Service Fund 430,429 507,525 427,144 428,546 329,479 330,879 292,032 293,694 465,956 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building 20,700 8,400 5,250 9,150 573,374 - - - - Vehicle&Equipment 84,458 97,980 126,200 126,783 259,750 173,051 195,687 195,687 195,686 City-Wide Capital 321,803 227,117 1,303,732 830,702 1,579,062 5,533,630 907,820 2,634,843 1,845,567 Enterprise Funds Water 2,628,534 2,855,198 2,801,379 3,131,811 2,641,090 2,671,612 2,661,616 2,693,959 2,724,188 Sewer 1,478,074 3,120,374 1,639,817 1,643,252 2,355,220 2,237,032 2,237,214 2,236,112 2,239,226 Recreation Center 620,018 634,563 622,500 513,206 617,957 - - - - Library Funds Library Operations 1,334,042 1,095,539 817,634 788,103 778,639 788,425 790,418 792,318 819,332 Library Debt Service - 718,979 797,299 797,309 771,963 716,388 734,513 737,038 744,263 Library Capital - 350,259 16,350 30,010 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 TOTAL REVENUES 21,312,181 24,664,255 23,282,875 23,778,960 269323,464 27,734,438 239465,263 259820,473 259121,856 39 United City of Yorkville Expenditure Budget Summary-All Funds Fiscal Years 2011-2018 FY 2013 FY2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FUND Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected General Fund 11,296,930 10,969,330 11,379,867 10,853,236 13,715,077 12,519,798 12,828,891 14,945,836 14,280,450 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax 452,490 276,141 573,860 395,012 1,378,456 608,112 652,868 683,269 509,385 Parks and Recreation 1,160,854 1,151,098 1,506,767 1,406,158 2,190,754 1,651,871 1,651,312 1,673,853 1,697,702 Land Cash 257,919 336,920 323,825 72,247 89,000 356,850 263,000 13,000 63,000 Fox Industrial TIF 81,922 829,118 - - - - - - - Countryside TIF 308,716 307,585 306,043 307,043 2,088,163 121,448 121,448 121,448 121,448 Downtown TIF 1,896 19,741 41,500 36,834 45,350 45,355 45,360 45,365 45,375 Fox Hill SSA 4,178 4,664 4,500 5,476 7,500 19,603 19,603 4,603 4,603 Sunflower SSA 8,136 7,272 9,986 11,714 14,985 35,985 35,985 10,985 10,985 Debt Service Fund 429,404 428,668 505,370 505,370 328,554 329,954 330,954 336,554 336,554 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building - 750 - 3,150 - - - - - Vehicle&Equipment 164,267 98,518 282,295 352,108 292,462 211,462 195,462 195,462 195,462 City-Wide Capital 302,773 146,573 1,040,500 538,461 1,425,583 1,489,983 5,233,137 2,880,088 1,845,566 Enterprise Funds Water 2,272,173 2,379,621 3,085,983 3,053,376 2,648,392 2,684,253 2,691,176 2,722,600 2,739,200 Sewer 1,835,456 2,494,670 1,895,210 1,750,812 2,585,179 2,716,285 2,512,666 2,527,216 2,548,495 Recreation Center 687,260 659,476 703,633 760,673 150,489 - - - - Library Fund Library Operations 1,587,712 1,024,044 794,413 776,780 768,816 780,954 794,206 803,930 814,230 Library Debt Service - 720,800 795,488 795,488 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Library Capital - 343,465 13,474 17,974 38,850 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 20,852,086 22,198,454 23,262,714 21,641,910 28,539,372 24,308,121 28,130,402 27,721,066 259976,537 40 United City of Yorkville Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Fund Balance Summary Beginning Budgeted Budgeted Surplus Ending FUND Fund Balance Revenues Expenditures (Deficit) Fund Balance General Fund 3,445,724 13,009,489 13,715,077 (705,588) 2,740,136 Special Revenue Funds Motor Fuel Tax 1,055,589 944,000 1,378,456 (434,456) 621,133 Parks and Recreation 293,043 2,228,704 2,190,754 37,950 330,993 Land Cash 85,081 166,500 89,000 77,500 162,581 Fox Industrial TIF - - - - - Countryside TIF 1,573,929 1,550 2,088,163 (2,086,613) (512,684) Downtown TIF 261,449 35,350 45,350 (10,000) 251,449 Fox Hill SSA 15,391 3,786 7,500 (3,714) 11,677 Sunflower SSA 8,014 7,531 14,985 (7,454) 560 Debt Service Fund 10,686 329,479 328,554 925 11,611 Capital Project Funds Municipal Building (573,374) 573,374 - 573,374 - Vehicle&Equipment 129,270 259,750 292,462 (32,712) 96,558 City-Wide Capital 373,437 1,579,062 1,425,583 153,479 526,916 Enterprise Funds Water 1,379,272 2,641,090 2,648,392 (7,301) 1,371,971 Sewer 2,895,977 2,355,220 2,585,179 (229,959) 2,666,019 Recreation Center (467,468) 617,957 150,489 467,468 0 Library Funds Library Operations 400,154 778,639 768,816 9,823 409,977 Library Debt Service 0 771,963 771,763 200 200 Library Capital 18,830 20,020 38,850 (18,830) - Totals 10,905,005 26,323,464 28,539,372 (2,215,908) 8,689,097 * Fund Balance Equivalent 41 GENERAL FUND(01) The General Fund is the City's primary operating fund. It accounts for major tax revenue used to support administrative and public safety functions. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 7,230,149 7,942,975 8,788,433 9,171,463 9,359,104 9,490,730 9,644,790 9,794,888 9,990,715 Intergovernmental 1,791,792 1,889,036 1,759,600 1,997,077 1,998,200 2,003,500 2,003,500 2,013,500 2,013,500 Licenses&Permits 241,752 171,921 169,300 169,300 193,000 193,000 218,000 218,000 243,000 Fines&Forfeits 201,236 175,159 201,500 162,200 180,200 180,200 180,200 180,200 180,200 Charges for Service 1,537,831 1,561,554 1,178,284 1,179,557 1,181,235 1,182,607 1,183,993 1,185,393 1,193,307 Investment Earnings 1,747 5,102 3,100 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 Reimbursements 484,593 419,903 199,892 218,240 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Miscellaneous 28,861 13,702 11,000 124,000 11,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 Other Financing Sources - 332,500 - - 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 Total Revenue 11,517,961 12,511,852 12,311,109 13,028,337 13,009,489 13,149,787 13,330,233 13,491,732 13,720,472 Expenditures Salaries 3,517,151 3,029,713 3,371,895 3,304,920 3,583,218 3,583,218 3,583,218 3,583,218 3,583,218 Benefits 2,446,452 2,407,769 2,327,040 2,075,440 2,181,806 2,313,210 2,454,622 2,563,123 2,676,631 Contractual Services 3,470,156 3,944,907 3,840,120 3,636,073 3,830,760 3,991,365 4,061,923 4,151,412 4,245,956 Supplies 271,393 236,916 274,151 282,120 292,110 305,546 317,598 330,309 341,223 Contingencies 75,000 52,075 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Other Financing Uses 1,516,778 1,297,950 1,516,661 1,504,683 3,777,183 2,276,458 2,361,530 4,267,774 3,383,423 Total Expenditures 11,296,930 10,969,330 11,379,867 10,853,236 13,715,077 12,519,798 12,828,891 14,945,836 14,280,450 Surplus(Deficit) 221,031 1,542,522 931,242 2,175,101 (705,588) 629,989 501,342 (1,454,104) (559,978) Ending Fund Balance (271,900) 1,270,623 1,596,094 3,445,724 2,740,136 3,370,126 3,871,468 2,417,364 1,857,386 -2.41% 11.58% 14.03% 31.75% 19.98% 26.92% 30.18% 16.17% 13.01 Fund Balance $5,000 $4,000 c $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 ($1,000) 42 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected GENERAL FUND-01 01-000-40-00-4000 PROPERTY TAXES-CORPORATE LEVY 2,185,495 2,282,246 2,288,133 2,276,807 2,288,154 2,311,036 2,334,146 2,357,487 2,381,062 01-000-40-00-4010 PROPERTY TAXES-POLICE PENSION 336,075 360,356 413,354 438,711 562,000 587,000 612,000 637,000 662,000 01-00040-004085 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX INDUSTRIAL TIF - 67,334 20,000 - - - - - - 01-00040-00-4030 MUNICIPAL SALES TAX 2,569,233 2,552,483 2,325,000 2,425,000 2,449,250 2,473,743 2,523,217 2,573,682 2,650,892 01-000-40-00-4035 NON-HOME RULE SALES TAX - 410,327 1,500,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 1,818,000 1,854,360 1,891,447 1,948,191 01-00040-004040 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 605,833 603,015 603,432 603,432 605,000 611,050 617,161 623,332 629,565 01-000-40-00-4041 NATURAL GAS UTILITY TAX 268,166 225,411 296,514 250,000 275,000 280,000 282,800 285,628 288,484 01-000-40-00-4043 EXCISE TAX 491,188 500,415 490,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 506,000 506,000 510,000 01-000-40-00-4044 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 23,002 18,393 23,500 20,000 20,200 20,402 20,606 20,812 21,020 01-000-40-00-4045 CABLE FRANCHISE FEES 228,452 221,465 230,000 230,000 230,000 230,000 235,000 235,000 235,000 01-000-40-00-4050 HOTELTAX 38,198 51,029 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 01-000-40-00-4060 AMUSEMENT TAX 319 127,737 134,000 148,000 165,000 195,000 195,000 200,000 200,000 01-000-40-00-4065 ADMISSIONS TAX 181,744 190,627 104,500 119,199 104,500 104,500 104,500 104,500 104,500 01-00040-00-4070 BUSINESS DISTRICT TAX-KNDLL MKTPLCE 289,015 305,908 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 01-00040-004072 BUSINESS DISTRICT TAX-DOWNTOWN - - - - - - - - - 01-000-40-00-4075 AUTO RENTAL TAX 8,298 9,549 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 01-000-40-00-4080 PARA-MUTUEL TAX 5,131 16,680 - 314 - - - - - 01-000-41-004100 STATE INCOME TAX 1,315,321 1,444,426 1,320,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 01-000-41-00-4105 LOCAL USE TAX 240,047 246,963 242,400 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 255,000 255,000 01-000-41-00-4110 ROAD&BRIDGE TAX 164,296 166,896 170,000 168,477 170,000 175,000 175,000 180,000 180,000 01-00041-004120 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX 16,394 15,030 16,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 01-00041-00-4160 FEDERAL GRANTS 13,288 12,521 9,200 12,500 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 01-000-41-00-4170 STATE GRANTS 40,250 2,123 - - - - - - - 01-000-41-00-4182 MISC INTERGOVERNMENTAL 2,196 1,077 2,000 1,100 1,200 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 01-000-42-00-4200 LIQUOR LICENSE 38,903 43,265 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 01-000-42-00-4205 OTHER LICENSES&PERMITS 2,670 6,256 2,700 2,700 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-000-42-004210 BUILDING PERMITS 126,829 122,400 126,600 126,600 150,000 150,000 175,000 175,000 200,000 01-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES 73,350 - - - - - - - - 01-000-43-00-4310 CIRCUIT COURT FINES 95,289 66,028 95,000 60,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 01-000-43-00-4320 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION 25,457 24,206 26,000 32,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 43 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 01-00043-004323 OFFENDER REGISTRATION FEES - 175 500 200 200 200 200 200 200 01-000-43-00-4325 POLICE TOWS 80,490 84,750 80,000 70,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 01-000-44-00-4400 GARBAGE SURCHARGE 1,177,995 1,231,681 1,021,784 1,023,581 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,030,000 01-000-44-00-4407 LATE PENALTIES-GARBAGE - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-000-44-00-4405 COLLECTION FEE-YBSD 116,087 134,531 151,500 135,876 137,235 138,607 139,993 141,393 142,807 01-000-44-00-4414 OTHER SERVICES 3,960 - - - - - - - - 01-00044-00-4451 WATER CHARGEBACK 91,863 91,863 01-00044-004452 SEWER CHARGEBACK 83,045 83,045 01-000-44-00-4472 LAND CASH CHARGEBACK 60,449 20,084 - - - - - - - 01-00044-00-4474 POLICE SPECIAL DETAIL 4,432 350 5,000 100 500 500 500 500 500 01-00045-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1,747 5,102 3,100 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 01-000-46-00-4601 REIMB-LEGAL EXPENSES 46,951 28,738 - - - - - - - 01-000-46-00-4604 REIMB-ENGINEERING EXPENSES - 25,697 - - - - - - - 01-000-46-00-4650 REIMB-TRAFFIC SIGNAL 33,067 28,582 15,000 20,019 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-000-46-00-4668 REIMB-COBRA CONTRIBUTIONS 21,675 23,220 12,500 817 - - - - - 01-000-46-00-4669 REIMB-RETIREE INS CONTRIBUTIONS 39,671 48,447 60,398 50,994 01-00046-004670 REIMB-EMPLOYEE INS CONTRIBUTIONS 193,147 91,536 61,295 66,571 01-00046-004671 REIMB-LIFE INSURANCE 4,789 3,363 1,699 2,229 01-00046-004672 REIMB-LIBRARY INSURANCE - 93,842 - - - - - - - 01-00046-004680 REIMB-LIABILITY INSURANCE 35,711 3,417 5,000 29,610 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 01-00046-004681 REIMB-WORKERS COMP 22,207 25,557 - - - - - - - 01-00046-004685 REIMB-CABLE CONSORTIUM 19,505 37,167 40,000 37,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 01-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 67,870 10,337 4,000 11,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 01-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 5,600 8,460 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 01-00048-004821 BAD DEBT RECOVERY 10,849 - - - - - - - - 01-00048-004845 DONATIONS 2,784 50 - - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-00048-004850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 9,628 5,192 3,000 116,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-000-49-00-4916 TRANSFER FROM MUNICIPAL BUILDING - - - - 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 01-000-49-00-4984 TRANSFER FROM LIBRARY CAPITAL - 332,500 - - - - - - - Revenue 11,517,961 12,5119852 12,3119109 13,028,337 13,009,489 13,149,787 13,330,233 13,491,732 13,720,472 44 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT The Administration Department includes both the legislative and management expenditures. The legislative branch consists of the Mayor and City Council. The city administrator is hired by the Mayor with the consent of the City Council. City staff report to the city administrator. It is the role of the city administrator to direct staff in the daily administration of City services. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 319,269 307,078 333,395 338,320 372,745 372,745 372,745 372,745 372,745 Benefits 48,949 49,070 275,732 260,903 240,161 257,470 276,509 289,080 302,403 Contractual Services 119,138 111,976 160,250 158,900 146,800 132,745 133,887 134,929 136,023 Supplies 11,264 8,084 12,950 12,950 12,950 12,950 12,950 12,950 12,950 Total Administration 498,620 476,208 782,327 771,073 772,656 775,910 796,092 809,704 824,121 $900 $800 $700 s° $600 r $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 45 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Administration 01-110-50-00-5001 SALARIES-MAYOR 10,700 10,105 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 01-110-50-00-5002 SALARIES-LIQUOR COMM 1,167 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 01-110-50-00-5003 SALARIES-CITY CLERK 9,305 8,535 9,000 9,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 01-110-50-00-5004 SALARIES-CITY TREASURER 6,105 5,800 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 01-110-50-00-5005 SALARIES-ALDERMAN 52,455 48,270 50,320 50,320 52,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 52,000 01-110-50-00-5007 SALARIES-ADMINISTRATION 239,314 232,228 255,000 260,000 268,745 268,745 268,745 268,745 268,745 01-110-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES - - - - 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 01-110-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 223 1,140 575 500 500 500 500 500 500 01-110-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 26,574 27,723 28,383 30,000 38,584 38,584 38,584 38,584 38,584 01-110-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 22,375 21,347 22,500 22,500 27,404 27,404 27,404 27,404 27,404 01-110-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 72,456 72,456 68,313 75,144 82,659 87,618 92,875 01-110-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 614 614 500 505 510 515 520 01-110-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 5,096 5,096 6,059 6,665 7,331 7,771 8,238 01-110-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 586 586 649 714 785 832 882 01-110-52-00-5235 ELECTED OFFICIAL-GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 133,917 120,000 89,956 98,952 108,847 115,378 122,300 01-110-52-00-5236 ELECTED OFFICIAL-GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1,043 750 700 707 714 721 728 01-110-52-00-5237 ELECTED OFFICIAL-DENTAL INSURANCE 10,008 8,000 7,221 7,943 8,737 9,262 9,817 01-110-52-00-5238 ELECTED OFFICIAL-VISION INSURANCE - 1,129 900 775 853 938 994 1,054 01-110-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - 1,925 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-110-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 790 1,565 6,000 6,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 01-110-54-00-5423 PUBLIC RELATIONS 55 - - - - - - - - 01-110-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 655 774 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 01-110-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING 8,081 5,972 6,750 6,750 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 01-110-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 12,520 14,085 15,000 18,750 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-110-54-00-5448 FILING FEES - - 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 01-110-54-00-5451 CODIFICATION 4,159 3,902 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 01-110-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 8,055 4,449 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 01-110-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 12,872 12,368 16,600 16,600 16,600 16,600 16,600 16,600 16,600 01-110-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,539 13,581 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-110-54-00-5473 KENDALL COUNTY PARATRANSIT 27,553 23,550 30,000 30,000 15,000 - - - - 01-110-54-00-5474 SENIOR SERVICE FUNDING - - - - - 46 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 01-110-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 21,735 13,887 23,100 18,000 18,900 19,845 20,837 21,879 22,973 01-110-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 1,716 1,900 1,900 2,150 2,150 2,300 2,300 2,300 01-110-54-00-5488 OFFICE CLEANING 13,124 14,202 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 14,400 01-110-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 9,320 8,015 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 01-110-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 1,944 - 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 01-110-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - 69 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 498,620 476,208 782,327 771,073 772,656 775,910 7969092 809,704 824,121 47 FINANCE DEPARTMENT The Finance Department is responsible for the accounting,internal controls,external reporting and auditing of all financial transactions. The Finance Department is in charge of the annual audit,utility billing,payables and payroll and works with administration in the preparation of the annual budget. Personnel are budgeted in the General and Water funds. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 201,586 170,294 185,000 180,000 186,852 186,852 186,852 186,852 186,852 Benefits 34,085 29,628 62,135 62,377 62,603 65,345 68,361 70,352 72,463 Contractual Services 93,906 80,204 88,150 75,100 82,550 86,750 87,850 88,950 91,550 Supplies 3,281 4,042 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 Total Finance 332,858 284,168 340,535 322,727 337,255 344,197 348,313 351,404 356,115 $400 $350 $300 3 $250 0 F $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 48 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Finance 01-120-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 201,586 170,294 185,000 180,000 186,852 186,852 186,852 186,852 186,852 01-120-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 18,759 16,586 18,659 18,659 20,708 20,708 20,708 20,708 20,708 01-120-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 15,326 13,042 13,005 13,500 14,143 14,143 14,143 14,143 14,143 01-120-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 26,472 26,472 23,655 26,021 28,623 30,340 32,160 01-120-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 461 360 370 374 377 381 385 01-120-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 3,182 3,062 3,367 3,704 4,074 4,319 4,578 01-120-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - 356 324 360 396 436 462 489 01-120-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - 670 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-120-54-00-5414 AUDITING SERVICES 43,500 44,800 36,000 31,000 31,000 35,200 36,300 37,400 40,000 01-120-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 237 1,000 500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-120-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING - - 500 1,500 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 01-120-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 633 540 600 1,000 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 01-120-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 474 648 500 750 750 750 750 750 750 01-120-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 902 480 850 600 800 800 800 800 800 01-120-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 29,531 27,255 40,000 35,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 01-120-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 18,028 5,324 4,900 2,250 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 01-120-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 838 250 1,800 500 750 750 750 750 750 01-120-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,520 1,955 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 01-120-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 01-120-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 1,761 2,087 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 332,858 2849168 340,535 322,727 337,255 344,197 348,313 351,404 356,115 49 COMMUNITY RELATIONS The Community Relations department was closed out at the end of fiscal year 2011. Expenditures are now budgeted out of the administrative services department. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 63,359 - - - - - - - - Benefits 7,939 - - - - - - - - Contractual Services 11,361 333 - - - - - - - Supplies 656 - - - - - - - - Total Community Relations 83,315 333 - - - - - - - $100 $80 3 t $60 H $40 $20 $0 50 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Community Relations O1-130-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 63,359 O1-130-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 4,004 O1-130-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 3,935 - 01-130-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 5,977 333 01-130-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 279 - 01-130-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 1,630 01-130-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,475 01-130-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 130 O1-130-56-00-5692 COMMUNITY EVENTS 526 - 83,315 333 - - - - 51 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT The Engineering Department was closed out at the beginning of fiscal year 2012. Expenditures are now budgeted out of the administrative services department. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 235,639 75,383 - - - - - - - Benefits 95,112 22,485 - - - - - - - Contractual Services 10,022 4,348 - - - - - - - Supplies 9,994 7 - - - - - - - Total Engineering 350,767 102,223 - - - - - - - $400 c $350 $300 s° $250 r $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 52 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Engineering O1-150-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 235,552 75,383 O1-150-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 87 - O1-150-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 21,727 7,169 01-150-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 17,409 5,716 01-150-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 50,712 8,826 01-150-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 909 76 01-150-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 3,814 627 O1-150-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 541 71 O1-150-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 3 O1-150-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING 1,116 286 O1-150-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1,340 207 01-150-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 257 23 w, 01-150-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 428 - 01-150-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,578 2,164 01-150-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 1,638 -• u O1-150-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 1,303 27 . O1-150-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,006 7 ,_ O1-150-56-00-5622 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 928 _. O1-150-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 2,627 01-150-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS 126 01-150-56-00-5690 SUPPLIES-GRANT REIMBURSABLE 5,307 - 350,767 102,223 - - - - - - 53 POLICE DEPARTMENT The mission of the Yorkville Police Department is to work in partnership with the community to protect life and property,assist neighborhoods with solving their problems and enhance thf quality of life in our city. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 2,127,332 2,028,011 2,305,500 2,279,500 2,462,197 2,462,197 2,462,197 2,462,197 2,462,197 Benefits 507,612 521,435 1,169,457 1,115,046 1,289,493 1,367,019 1,449,795 1,512,939 1,578,370 Contractual Services 131,034 163,951 213,850 209,180 209,350 263,006 287,142 286,142 287,141 Supplies 112,842 133,023 151,770 138,700 153,270 159,637 166,449 173,738 181,537 Total Police 2,878,820 2,846,420 3,840,577 3,742,426 4,114,310 4,251,859 4,365,582 4,435,016 4,509,245 $5,000 $4,500 $4,000 c $3,500 ° $3,000 s H $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 54 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Police 01-210-50-00-5006 SALARIES-LIEUT/SERGEANTS/CHIEFS 660,249 600,533 - - - - - - - 01-210-50-00-5008 SALARIES-POLICE OFFICERS 1,167,964 1,149,440 1,261,000 1,261,000 1,404,518 1,404,518 1,404,518 1,404,518 1,404,518 01-210-50-00-5011 SALARIES-POLICE CHIEF&DEPUTIES - - 317,000 295,000 305,000 305,000 305,000 305,000 305,000 01-210-50-00-5012 SALARIES-SERGEANTS - - 430,000 410,000 439,849 439,849 439,849 439,849 439,849 01-210-50-00-5013 SALARIES-POLICE CLERKS 156,502 128,755 135,000 130,000 129,330 129,330 129,330 129,330 129,330 01-210-50-00-5014 SALARIES-CROSSING GUARD 17,381 19,413 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-210-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 30,604 33,832 52,500 52,500 52,500 52,500 52,500 52,500 52,500 01-210-50-00-5017 CADET PROGRAM 12,045 6,089 - - - - - - - 01-210-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 82,587 89,949 90,000 111,000 111,000 111,000 111,000 111,000 111,000 01-210-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 14,455 11,696 15,818 14,000 14,333 14,333 14,333 14,333 14,333 01-210-52-00-5213 EMPLOYER CONTRI-POLICE PENSION 336,075 360,356 413,354 438,711 562,000 587,000 612,000 637,000 662,000 01-210-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 157,082 149,383 175,000 175,000 184,704 184,704 184,704 184,704 184,704 01-210-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 517,950 440,000 478,421 526,263 578,889 613,623 650,440 01-210-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 5,635 5,635 3,550 3,586 3,621 3,658 3,694 01-210-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 37,428 37,428 42,090 46,299 50,929 53,985 57,224 01-210-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - 4,272 4,272 4,395 4,835 5,318 5,637 5,975 01-210-54-00-5410 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 1,808 1,510 2,800 - 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 2,800 01-210-54-00-5411 POLICE COMMISSION 3,677 16,281 4,000 9,000 16,500 4,000 15,000 4,000 15,000 01-210-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCE 8,554 8,275 15,000 15,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 01-210-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 1,873 6,690 10,000 6,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 01-210-54-00-5422 VEHICLE&EQUIPMENT CHARGEBACK - - - - - 56,156 78,792 78,792 78,791 01-210-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 86 11 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 01-210-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING 2,923 4,151 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 01-210-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 22,142 25,933 36,500 36,500 36,500 36,500 36,500 36,500 36,500 01-210-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 986 1,346 3,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-210-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,115 1,340 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 1,350 01-210-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,222 17,989 5,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 01-210-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - - 20,000 20,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 01-210-54-00-5467 ADJUDICATION SERVICES 16,863 18,078 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-210-54-00-5469 NEW WORLD LIVE SCAN 10,281 10,944 15,000 9,666 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 01-210-54-00-5472 KENDALL CO.JUVE PROBATION 2,683 2,389 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 55 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 01-210-54-00-5484 MDT-ALERTS FEE 6,660 6,660 7,000 6,660 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 01-210-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 4,224 4,500 5,304 6,500 6,500 7,000 7,000 7,000 01-210-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 47,161 38,130 61,000 61,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 01-210-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 10,586 17,449 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 01-210-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,933 2,266 4,000 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 01-210-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 7,061 6,491 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 01-210-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 5,032 8,405 7,000 6,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 01-210-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 6,569 12,821 12,250 12,000 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 12,250 01-210-56-00-5650 COMMUNITY SERVICES 3,020 77 7,370 1,000 7,370 7,370 7,370 7,370 7,370 01-210-56-00-5690 SUPPLIES-GRANT REIMBURSABLE 5,566 4,314 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 01-210-56-00-5695 GASOLINE 70,080 79,977 90,950 85,000 90,950 97,317 104,129 111,418 119,217 01-210-56-00-5696 AMMUNITION 1,995 1,223 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,878,820 2,846,420 3,840,577 3,742,426 4,114,310 49251,859 4,365,582 4,435,016 4,5099245 56 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT The primary focus of the Community Development Department is to ensure that all existing and new construction is consistent with the overall development goals of the City which entails short and long-range planning,administration of zoning regulations,building permits issuance and code enforcement.The department also provides staff support to the City Council,Plan Commission,Zoning Board of Appeals and Park Board and assists in the review of all development plans proposed within the United City of Yorkville. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 269,607 188,249 248,000 220,000 228,419 228,419 228,419 228,419 228,419 Benefits 43,761 31,460 109,797 92,911 88,043 92,901 98,244 101,771 105,510 Contractual Services 69,730 83,661 92,350 69,717 81,750 83,622 85,769 87,794 89,899 Supplies 12,193 3,683 11,279 16,682 11,535 11,808 12,101 12,415 12,750 Total Community Development 395,291 307,053 461,426 399,310 409,747 416,750 424,533 430,398 436,578 $500 v N $400 3 O $300 $200 $100 $0 57 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Community Development 01-220-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 269,607 188,249 195,000 190,000 198,419 198,419 198,419 198,419 198,419 01-220-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES - - 53,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 01-220-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 24,175 17,492 26,227 21,500 21,990 21,990 21,990 21,990 21,990 01-220-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 19,586 13,968 19,000 17,000 17,164 17,164 17,164 17,164 17,164 01-220-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 59,499 50,000 44,261 48,687 53,556 56,769 60,175 01-220-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 461 511 350 354 357 361 364 01-220-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 4,139 3,500 3,853 4,239 4,663 4,942 5,239 01-220-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - 471 400 425 468 514 545 578 01-220-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 115 1,144 1,500 1,763 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-220-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 573 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 01-220-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 87 185 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 01-220-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING 1,062 994 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 01-220-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1,318 1,736 1,500 2,400 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-220-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 230 719 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 01-220-54-00-5459 INSPECTIONS 17,387 26,060 25,000 - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 01-220-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,016 1,075 1,500 2,804 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-220-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,738 1,026 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 01-220-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES 1,777 3,511 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01-220-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 1,638 3,600 3,000 2,700 2,700 2,900 2,900 2,900 01-220-54-00-5486 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 46,800 48,672 50,619 52,644 54,749 01-220-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 469 311 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 01-220-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 712 2,928 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01-220-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT - - 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 01-220-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 2,171 - 3,500 9,153 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 01-220-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS 493 444 500 250 500 500 500 500 500 01-220-56-00-5690 SUPPLIES-GRANT REIMBURSABLE 8,348 - - - - - - - - 01-220-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - - 3,654 3,654 3,910 4,183 4,476 4,790 5,125 395,291 307,053 461,426 399,310 409,747 416,750 424,533 430,398 436,578 58 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The Public Works Department is an integral part of the United City of Yorkville. We provide high quality drinking water,efficient disposal of sanitary waste and maintain a comprehensive road and storm sewer network to ensure the safety and quality of life for the citizens of Yorkville. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 295,927 260,348 295,000 287,000 332,505 332,505 332,505 332,505 332,505 Benefits 49,515 44,246 147,530 150,914 152,791 161,841 171,795 178,367 185,333 Contractual Services 1,321,931 1,314,041 1,390,020 1,227,880 1,446,570 1,318,180 1,282,901 1,291,052 1,303,484 Supplies 121,163 85,167 87,902 95,950 104,105 110,901 115,848 120,956 123,736 Total Public Works 1,788,536 1,703,802 1,920,452 1,761,744 2,035,971 1,923,427 1,903,050 1,922,880 1,945,058 $2,100 $2,000 3 O r $1,900 $1,800 $1,700 $1,600 $1,500 59 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Street Operations 01410-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 285,143 253,695 280,000 272,000 317,505 317,505 317,505 317,505 317,505 01-410-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 10,784 6,653 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 01-410-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 27,424 24,887 31,753 31,753 36,851 36,851 36,851 36,851 36,851 01-410-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 22,091 19,359 23,500 22,000 24,857 24,857 24,857 24,857 24,857 01-410-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 83,361 88,000 82,000 90,200 99,220 105,173 111,484 01-410-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1,317 1,311 650 657 663 670 676 01-410-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 6,826 7,100 7,608 8,369 9,206 9,758 10,344 01-410-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - 773 750 825 908 998 1,058 1,122 01410-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 180 1,440 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01410-54-00-5422 VEHICLE&EQUIPMENT CHARGEBACK - - - - 144,650 51,795 51,795 51,795 51,795 01-410-54-00-5435 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-410-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 2,053 2,506 4,020 2,600 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 01410-54-00-5446 PROPERTY&BLDG MAINT SERVICES 8,267 18,329 20,000 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 30,000 01-410-54-00-5454 SIDEWALK PROGRAM 1,225 869 4,000 2,000 - - - - - 01410-54-00-5455 MOSQUITO CONTROL 6,500 6,500 7,000 6,730 8,000 8,400 8,820 9,261 9,724 01-410-54-00-5458 TREE&STUMP REMOVAL 8,300 6,025 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01410-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,165 970 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 01-410-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 89,784 57,145 90,000 90,000 94,500 99,225 104,186 109,396 114,865 01-410-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 176 1,051 1,000 1,050 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 1,100 01-410-54-00-5490 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 22,110 20,886 35,000 35,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-410-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 2,386 2,581 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 4,200 01-410-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 3,801 10,648 9,500 9,500 9,975 10,474 10,997 11,547 12,125 01-410-56-00-5626 HANGING BASKETS 2,048 2,041 - - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 01410-56-00-5628 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01410-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 1,896 7,962 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 1,750 01-410-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 76,277 22,671 36,500 36,500 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 01-410-56-00-5656 PROPERTY&BLDG MAINT SUPPLIES 5,405 8,240 20,000 20,000 22,500 25,000 27,500 30,000 30,000 01-410-56-00-5695 GASOLINE 29,350 31,024 15,952 24,000 25,680 27,478 29,401 31,459 33,661 606,365 505,482 714,452 714,244 926,151 856,767 879,550 899,380 915,058 60 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Health&Sanitation O1-540-54-00-5441 GARBAGE SERVICES-SENIOR SUBSIDY - - 153,216 143,000 86,320 43,160 - - - O1-540-54-00-5442 GARBAGE SERVICES 1,177,611 1,193,400 1,046,784 900,000 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,030,000 O1-540-54-00-5443 LEAF PICKUP 4,560 4,920 6,000 4,500 - - - - - 1,182,171 1,198,320 1,206,000 1,0479500 1,109,820 1,066,660 1,023,500 1,023,500 1,030,000 Total Public Works 1,788,536 1,703,802 1,920,452 19761,744 2,035,971 1,923,427 1,9039050 1,922,880 1,945,058 61 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT The Administrative Services Department accounts for general fund expenditures that are shared by all departments and cannot be easily classified in one department or the other. These expenditures include such items as tax rebates,bad debt,contingencies,corporate legal expenditures and interfund transfers. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Expenditures Salaries 4,432 350 5,000 100 500 500 500 500 500 Benefits 1,659,479 1,709,445 562,389 393,290 348,715 368,634 389,919 410,614 432,551 Contractual Services 1,713,034 2,186,393 1,895,500 1,895,296 1,863,740 2,107,062 2,184,374 2,262,546 2,337,858 Supplies - 2,910 5,000 12,588 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Contingencies 75,000 52,075 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Other Financing Uses 1,516,778 1,297,950 1,516,661 1,504,683 3,777,183 2,276,458 2,361,530 4,267,774 3,383,423 Total Admin Services&Transfers 4,968,723 5,249,123 4,034,550 3,855,956 6,045,138 4,807,655 4,991,322 6,996,433 6,209,331 $8,000 $7,000 3 $6,000 0 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 62 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Administrative Services 01-640-50-00-5092 POLICE SPECIAL DETAIL WAGES 4,432 350 5,000 100 500 500 500 500 500 01-640-52-00-5211 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION-ERI - - 60,000 - - - - - - 01-640-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 1,135,216 1,199,018 - 01-640-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 23,151 14,022 01-640-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 83,004 86,598 01-640-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 11,991 10,117 - 01-640-52-00-5225 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE 2,425 - 150 - - - - - - 01-640-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 77,786 91,200 47,143 37,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 01-640-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE 325,906 308,490 332,256 250,000 261,302 276,980 293,599 311,215 329,888 01-640-52-00-5240 RETIREES-GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 104,458 100,000 42,413 46,654 51,320 54,399 57,663 01-640-52-00-5241 RETIREES-DENTAL INSURANCE 5,246 5,246 - - - - - 01-640-52-00-5242 RETIREES-VISION INSURANCE 636 636 01-640-52-00-5250 COBRA-GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 11,375 408 01-640-52-00-5251 COBRA-DENTAL INSURANCE 1,000 - 01-640-52-00-5252 COBRA-VISION INSURANCE 125 - - - - - 01-640-54-00-5439 AMUSEMENT TAX REBATE - 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 37,500 01-640-54-00-5449 KENCOM - - - - 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000 01-640-54-00-5450 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES 55,155 140,000 140,000 90,000 94,500 99,225 104,186 109,396 01-640-54-00-5453 SPECIAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - - - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 01-640-54-00-5456 CORPORATE COUNSEL 117,960 81,998 130,000 110,000 110,000 115,500 121,275 127,339 133,706 01-640-54-00-5461 LITIGATION COUNSEL 87,544 70,469 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 01-640-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 450 500 901 500 500 500 500 500 01-640-54-00-5463 SPECIAL COUNSEL 59,394 25,261 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 01-640-54-00-5465 ENGINEERING SERVICES - 222,269 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 01-640-54-00-5475 CABLE CONSORTIUM FEE 75,262 93,150 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 01-640-54-00-5479 COMMUNITY RELATIONS - 440 - - - - - - - 01-640-54-00-5481 HOTEL TAX REBATE 33,255 45,926 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 01-640-54-00-5491 CITY PROPERTY TAX REBATE 812 1,532 1,500 1,196 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 01-640-54-00-5492 SALES TAX REBATE 863,793 1,024,421 824,000 824,000 832,240 840,562 857,374 874,521 900,757 01-640-54-00-5493 BUSINESS DISTRICT REBATE 283,777 305,908 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 01-640-54-00-5494 ADMISSIONS TAX REBATE 99,959 104,845 104,500 119,199 104,500 104,500 104,500 104,500 104,500 63 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 01-640-54-00-5499 BAD DEBT 91,278 154,569 - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 O1-640-56-00-5625 REIMBURSABLE REPAIRS - 2,910 5,000 12,588 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 O1-640-70-00-7799 CONTINGENCIES 75,000 52,075 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 01-640-99-00-9916 TRANSFER TO MUNICIPAL BUILDING - - - - 573,374 - - - - 01-640-99-00-9923 TRANSFER TO CITYWIDE CAPITAL 135,484 125,000 419,332 419,332 270,401 1,798,213 643,477 O1-640-99-00-9942 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE 429,404 103,740 99,465 99,465 - - - 82,372 335,254 01-640-99-00-9952 TRANSFER TO SEWER - - - - 1,137,220 1,133,972 1,134,654 1,134,052 1,137,166 01-640-99-00-9979 TRANSFER TO PARKS&RECREATION 951,890 736,710 955,886 955,886 1,765,504 1,110,111 1,192,708 1,217,069 1,229,444 01-640-99-00-9982 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY OPERATIONS - 332,500 41,978 30,000 30,684 32,375 34,168 36,068 38,082 4,968,723 5,249,123 4,034,550 3,855,956 6,045,138 4,807,655 4,991,322 6,996,433 692099331 Expenditures 11,296,930 10,969,330 11,379,867 10,853,236 13,715,077 12,5199798 129828,891 149945,836 14,280,450 Surplus(Deficit) 221,031 1,542,522 931,242 2,175,101 (705,588) 629,989 501,342 (1,454,104) (559,978) Fund Balance (2719900) 192709623 195969094 3,445,724 2,7409136 393709126 398719468 29417,364 1,857,386 -2.41% 11.58% 14.03% 31.75% 19.98% 26.92% 30.18% 16.17% 13.01% 64 Fox Hill SSA Fund (11) This fund was created for the purpose of maintaining the common areas of the Fox Hill Estates(SSA 2004-201)subdivision. All money for the fund is derived from property taxes levied on homeowners in the subdivision. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 19,894 3,786 3,786 3,786 3,786 8,536 8,536 8,536 8,536 Investment Earnings - 7 - 10 - - - - - Total Revenue 19,894 3,793 3,786 3,796 3,786 8,536 8,536 8,536 8,536 Expenditures Contractual Services 4,178 4,664 4,500 5,476 7,500 19,603 19,603 4,603 4,603 Total Expenditures 4,178 4,664 4,500 5,476 7,500 19,603 19,603 4,603 4,603 Surplus(Deficit) 15,716 (871) (714) (1,680) (3,714) (11,067) (11,067) 3,933 3,933 Ending Fund Balance 17,942 17,071 16,719 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) 429.44% 36602% 371.53% 281.06% 155.69% 3.11% -53.34% -141.73% -5629% $20 Fund Balance M N $10 3 $0 F ($10) ($20) 65 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Fox Hill SSA-11 11-00040-004011 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX HILL SSA 19,894 3,786 3,786 3,786 3,786 8,536 8,536 8,536 8,536 I1-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - 7 - 10 - - - - - Revenue 19,894 3,793 3,786 3,796 3,786 8,536 8,536 89536 8,536 11-111-54-00-5417 TRAIL MAINTENANCE - - - - - 15,000 15,000 - - I1-111-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 4,178 4,664 4,500 5,476 7,500 4,603 4,603 4,603 4,603 Expenditures 49178 4,664 4,500 5,476 7,500 19,603 19,603 4,603 4,603 Surplus(Deficit) 15,716 (871) (714) (1,680) (3,714) (11,067) (11,067) 3,933 3,933 Fund Balance 17,942 17,071 16,719 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) 429.44% 366.02% 371.53% 281.06% 155.69% 3.11% -53.34% -141.73% -5629% 66 Sunflower SSA Fund (12) This fund was created for the purpose of maintaining the common areas of the Sunflower Estates(SSA 2006-119)subdivision. All money for the fund is derived from property taxes levied on homeowners in the subdivision. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 13,871 7,530 7,531 7,530 7,531 17,416 17,416 17,416 17,416 Investment Earnings - 7 - 10 - - - - - Total Revenue 13,871 7,537 7,531 7,540 7,531 17,416 17,416 17,416 17,416 Expenditures Contractual Services 8,136 7,272 9,986 11,714 14,985 35,985 35,985 10,985 10,985 Total Expenditures 8,136 7,272 9,986 11,714 14,985 35,985 35,985 10,985 10,985 Surplus(Deficit) 5,735 265 (2,455) (4,174) (7,454) (18,569) (18,569) 6,431 6,431 Ending Fund Balance 11,922 12,188 10,007 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) 14653% 167.60% 100.21% 68.41% 3.74% -50.05% -101.65% -274.44% -215.89% $20 Fund Balance $0 0 s ($20) ($40) 67 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Sunflower SSA-12 12-00040-004012 PROPERTY TAXES-SUNFLOWER SSA 13,871 7,530 7,531 7,530 7,531 17,416 17,416 17,416 17,416 12-00045-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - 7 - 10 - - - - - Revenue 13,871 7,537 7,531 7,540 7,531 17,416 17,416 17,416 17,416 12-112-54-00-5416 POND MAINTENANCE - - - - - 25,000 25,000 - - 12-112-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 8,136 7,272 9,986 11,714 14,985 10,985 10,985 10,985 10,985 Expenditures 8,136 7,272 9,986 11,714 14,985 35,985 35,985 10,985 10,985 Surplus(Deficit) 5,735 265 (2,455) (4,174) (7,454) (18,569) (18,569) 6,431 6,431 Fund Balance 11,922 12,188 10,007 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) 14653% 167.60% 100.21% 68.41% 3.74% -50.05% -101.65% -274.44% -215.89% 68 Motor Fuel Tax Fund (15) The Motor Fuel Tax fund is used to maintain existing and construct new City owned roadways,alleys and parking lots. The fund also purchases materials used in the maintenance and operation of those facilities. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Intergovernmental 535,347 560,028 454,197 522,286 942,000 455,000 455,000 460,000 460,000 Investment Earnings 837 570 350 3,200 2,000 1,000 500 500 500 Reimbursements 151,000 - - 257 - - - - - Miscellaneous 85 - - - - - - - - Total Revenue 687,269 560,598 454,547 525,743 944,000 456,000 455,500 460,500 460,500 Expenditures Contractual Services 33,516 - - 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 Supplies 227,168 200,355 341,960 200,860 219,556 228,712 238,468 248,869 259,963 Capital Outlay 95,806 75,786 231,900 186,652 1,151,400 371,900 406,900 426,900 241,922 Other Financing Uses 96,000 - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures 452,490 276,141 573,860 395,012 1,378,456 608,112 652,868 683,269 509,385 Surplus(Deficit) 234,779 284,457 (119,313) 130,732 (434,456) (152,112) (197,368) (222,769) (48,885) Ending Fund Balance 640,399 924,857 465,255 1,055,589 621,133 469,021 271,653 48,885 0 y $1,200 Fund Balance $1,000 a $800 $600 4" $400 $200 $0 69 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Motor Fuel Tax -15 15-000-41-00-4112 MOTOR FUEL TAX 425,971 417,416 415,000 410,000 410,000 415,000 415,000 420,000 420,000 15-000-41-00-4113 MFT HIGH GROWTH 24,674 39,197 39,197 39,164 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 15-000-41-00-4170 STATE GRANTS 11,580 30;293 - - 492,000 - - - - 15-000-41-00-4172 ILLINOIS JOBS NOW PROCEEDS 73,122 73,122 - 73,122 - - - - - 15-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 837 570 350 3,200 2,000 1,000 500 500 500 15-000-46-00-4605 REIMB-OLD JAIUDWTWN PARKING LOT 151,000 - - - - - - - - 15-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS - 257 15-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 85 - - - - - - - Revenue 687,269 560,598 454,547 525,743 944,000 456,000 455,500 460,500 460,500 15-155-54-00-5438 SALT STORAGE - - - 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 15-155-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,587 - - - - - - 15-155-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 30,929 - - - - - - - - 15-155-56-00-5618 SALT 132,777 129,391 231,000 115,000 126,000 132,300 138,915 145,861 153,154 15-155-56-00-5619 SIGNS 1,232 6,732 35,000 20,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15-155-56-00-5632 PATCHING 52,481 47,093 50,000 47,007 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 15-155-56-00-5633 COLD PATCH 9,892 5,855 11,660 6,441 12,826 14,109 15,519 17,071 18,779 15-155-56-00-5634 HOT PATCH 7,658 11,284 14,300 12,412 15,730 17,303 19,033 20,937 23,030 15-155-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 23,128 - - - - - - - - 15-155-60-00-6003 MATERIAL STORAGE BLDG CONSTRUCTION - 75,000 - - - - 15-155-60-00-6025 ROAD TO BETTER ROADS PROGRAM - - 250,000 250,000 250,000 205,000 120,022 15-155-60-00-6072 DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT 42,420 875 - - 492,000 - - - - 15-155-60-00-6073 GAME FARM ROAD PROJECT 31,456 68,086 110,000 110,000 212,500 15-155-60-00-6074 FOX ROAD PROJECT 21,930 - - - - 15-155-60-00-6075 RIVER ROAD BRIDGE PROJECT - 6,825 - - - - - - - 15-155-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - 121,900 76,652 121,900 121,900 121,900 121,900 121,900 15-155-60-00-6089 CANNONBALL LAFO PROJECT - - - - 35,000 100,000 - 70 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 15-155-99-00-9923 TRANSFER TO CITY-WIDE CAPITAL 96,000 - - - - - - - - Expenditures 452,490 276,141 573,860 395,012 1,378,456 608,112 652,868 683,269 509,385 Surplus(Deficit) 234,779 284,457 (119,313) 130,732 (434,456) (152,112) (197,368) (222,769) (48,885) Fund Balance 640,399 924,857 465,255 1,055,589 621,133 469,021 271,653 48,885 0 71 Municipal Building Fund (16) The Municipal Building Fund was used to maintain existing City owned buildings and to fund land acquisition,design and construction of new buildings. This fund is scheduled to be closed out in fiscal year 2014. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Licenses&Permits 20,700 8,400 5,250 9,150 - - - -Other Financing Sources - - - - 573,374 - - - - Total Revenue 20,700 8,400 5,250 9,150 573,374 - - - - Expenditures Contractual Services - 750 - 3,150 - - - - - Total Expenditures - 750 - 3,150 - - - - - Surplus(Deficit) 20,700 7,650 5,250 6,000 573,374 - - - - Ending Fund Balance (587,024) (579,374) (575,774) (573,374) - - - - - $0 Fund Balance ($200) 0 ($400) ($600) ($800) 72 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Municipal Building-16 16-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES 20,700 7,650 5,250 6,000 16-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMITS - 750 - 3,150 - 16-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL - - - - 573,374 Revenue 20,700 8,400 5,250 9,150 573,374 - - 16-160-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM 750 3,150 Expenditures - 750 - 3,150 - - - - - Surplus(Deficit) 20,700 7,650 5,250 6,000 573,374 - - - Fund Balance (587,024) (579,374) (575,774) (573,374) - - - 73 City-Wide Capital Fund(23) The City-Wide Capital fund is used to maintain existing and construct new public infrastructure,and to fund other improvements that benefit the public. The Municipal Building fund was consolidated into this fund in fiscal year 2014. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Intergovernmental 64,000 - 231,000 - 327,600 93,760 218,200 147,160 512,720 Licenses&Permits 25,100 92,417 53,400 62,620 20,250 20,250 20,250 20,250 20,250 Charges for Service - - - - 669,120 669,120 669,120 669,120 669,120 Investment Earnings 19 114 250 250 500 250 100 - Reimbursements 1,200 9,586 - - - - - Miscellaneous - - - 13,500 126,441 - - - Other Financing Sources 231,484 125,000 1,019,332 754,332 435,401 4,750,000 - 1,798,213 643,477 Total Revenue 321,803 227,117 1,303,732 830,702 1,579,062 5,533,630 907,820 2,634,843 1,845,567 Expenditures Contractual Services 5,740 14,780 100,000 144,220 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Capital Outlay 172,033 6,793 940,500 394,241 1,287,000 1,351,400 4,763,000 2,407,840 1,372,278 Debt Service 125,000 125,000 - - 83,333 83,333 414,887 416,998 418,038 Other Financing Uses - - - - 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 Total Expenditures 302,773 146,573 1,040,500 538,461 1,425,583 1,489,983 5,233,137 2,880,088 1,845,566 Surplus(Deficit) 19,030 80,544 263,232 292,241 153,479 4,043,647 (4,325,317) (245,245) 1 Municipal Building Fund Balance - - - - - - - - City-Wide Capital Fund Balance 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 Ending Fund Balance 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 N $6,000 Fund Balance r m $4,000 3 t $2,000 H $0 ($2,000) 74 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected City-Wide Capital-23 23-00041-00-4176 STATE GRANTS-SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL 231,000 280,000 - - - 23-00041-00-4178 STATE GRANTS-ITEP KENNEDY RD TRAIL - - 47,600 73,960 7,000 114,160 12,720 23-000-41-00-4179 STATE GRANTS-DCEO TAP OLD JAIL 64,000 - - - - - 23-000-41-00-4181 STATE GRANTS-KKCOM STP GAME FARM - 19,800 211,200 33,000 - 23-000-41-00-4183 STATE GRANTS-ITEP DOWNTOWN - - - - - - - 500,000 23-000-42-00-4210 BUILDING PERMITS - 30,993 13,400 13,400 - 23-000-42-004213 ENGINEERING CAPITAL FEE 3,100 4,700 - - - - - - - 23-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES - 7,944 20,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 23-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMITS 14,780 - 44,220 - - - - - 23-000-42-00-4218 DEVELOPMENT FEES-MUNICIPAL BLDG - - - - 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 23-000-42-00-4222 ROAD CONTRIBUTION FEE 22,000 34,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 23-000-44-00-4440 ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE FEE - - - - 669,120 669,120 669,120 669,120 669,120 23-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 19 114 250 250 500 250 100 - 23-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 1,200 9,586 - - - - - 23-000-48-00-4860 PUSH FOR THE PATH PROCEEDS - - - 126,441 23-000-48-00-4880 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS 13,500 - - 23-000-49-00-4900 BOND PROCEEDS - - - 4,750,000 23-000-49-00-4905 LOAN PROCEEDS - - 600,000 335,000 165,000 - - - 23-00049-004901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 135,484 125,000 419,332 419,332 270,401 1,798,213 643,477 23-00049-004915 TRANSFER FROM MOTOR FUEL TAX 96,000 - - - - - - - Revenue 321,803 227,117 1,303,732 830,702 1,579,062 5,5339630 907,820 2,634,843 1,845,567 CW Municipal Building Expenditures 23-216-60-00-6020 BUILDINGS&STRUCTURES - - - - - - - - - 23-216-99-00-9901 TRANSFER TO GENERAL 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 5,250 75 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected City-Wide Capital Expenditures 23-230-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM - 14,780 - 44,220 23-230-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,740 - 100,000 100,000 - - - - - 23-230-54-00-5465 ENGINEERING SERVICES - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 23-230-60-00-6023 OLD JAIL PURCHASE 161,549 - - - - - - 23-230-60-00-6025 ROAD TO BETTER ROADS PROGRAM - 100,000 - 750,000 750,000 750,000 795,000 879,978 23-230-60-00-6041 SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION 10,484 - 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 - 23-230-60-00-6048 DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE IMPROV - - - - 450,000 450,000 23-230-60-00-6058 ROUTE 71(RTE 47-ORCHARD RD)PROJECT - - 110,400 - - 23-230-60-00-6059 US 34(IL 47/ORCHARD RD)PROJECT - 230,200 - - 23-230-60-00-6073 GAME FARM ROAD PROJECT - - 20,000 261,000 3,876,100 770,000 23-230-60-00-6075 RIVER ROAD BRIDGE PROJECT - 600,000 335,000 165,000 - - - 23-230-60-00-6092 SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL PROJECT 6,793 231,000 25,255 280,000 - - - - 23-230-60-00-6094 KENNEDY RD BIKE TRAIL - 9,500 33,986 59,500 97,700 14,000 380,340 42,300 2015 Bond 23-230-81-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - - 200,000 180,000 185,000 23-230-81-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - 131,554 153,665 149,705 Kendall County Loan-River Road Bridge 23-230-97-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - 83,333 83,333 83,333 83,333 83,333 Clark Property 23-230-97-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 125,000 125,000 - - - - - 302,773 146,573 1,040,500 538,461 1,420,333 1,484,733 5,227,887 2,874,838 1,840,316 Expenditures 302,773 146,573 1,040,500 538,461 1,425,583 1,489,983 5,2339137 2,880,088 1,845,566 Surplus(Deficit) 19,030 80,544 263,232 2929241 153,479 4,043,647 (4,325,317) (245,245) 1 Fund Balance-Municipal Building - - - Fund Balance-City Wide Capital 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570.562 245,245 (0) 0 Fund Balance 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 76 Vehicle and Equipment Fund(25) This fund is new for fiscal year 2014,consolidating the Police Capital,Public Works Capital and Park&Recreation Capital funds. This fund primarily derives its revenue from monies collected from building permits and development fees. The revenue is used to purchase vehicles and equipment for use in the operations of the police,public works and parks departments. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Licenses&Permits 43,167 55,000 50,750 64,315 49,275 49,275 49,275 49,275 49,275 Fines&Forfeits 12,612 6,233 11,650 12,850 8,850 8,850 8,850 8,850 8,850 Charges for Service 4,897 6,040 20,000 5,632 150,150 113,451 136,087 136,087 136,086 Investment Earnings 99 405 300 520 475 475 475 475 475 Reimbursements 7,500 10,702 40,000 40,000 50,000 - - - - Miscellaneous 16,183 16,100 1,000 966 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Other Financing Sources - 3,500 2,500 2,500 - - - - - Total Revenue 84,458 97,980 126,200 126,783 259,750 173,051 195,687 195,687 195,686 Police Capital Expenditures Contractual Services 9,493 2,647 12,500 17,270 11,667 11,667 11,667 11,667 11,667 Supplies - - 2,500 - - - - - - Capital Outlay 43,772 - 45,000 139,641 93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 93,000 Sub-Total Expenditures 53,265 2,647 60,000 156,911 104,667 104,667 104,667 104,667 104,667 Public Works Capital Expenditures Contractual Services 49 10,076 10,500 21,402 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 Supplies - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Capital Outlay 4,000 - 75,000 75,000 30,000 - - - - Debt Service 82,295 82,295 82,295 82,295 79,795 79,795 79,795 79,795 79,795 Sub-Total Expenditures 86,344 92,371 169,795 180,697 118,295 88,295 88,295 88,295 88,295 Parks Capital Expenditures Capital Outlay 24,658 - 50,000 12,000 17,000 16,000 - - - Debt Service - - - - 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Other Financing Uses - 3,500 2,500 2,500 50,000 - - - - Sub-Total Expenditures 24,658 3,500 52,500 14,500 69,500 18,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Total Expenditures 164,267 98,518 282,295 352,108 292,462 211,462 195,462 195,462 195,462 Surplus(Deficit) (79,809) (538) (156,095) (225,325) (32,712) (38,411) 225 225 224 Police Capital Fund Balance 194,947 229,238 104,737 101,427 22,635 (0) - 0 (0) Public Works Capital Fund Balance 108,743 62,884 (65,159) (62,855) 0 0 0 0 0 Parks Capital Fund Balance 51,443 62,473 22,545 90,698 73,923 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 Ending Fund Balance 355,133 354,595 62,123 129,270 96,558 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 N $400 Fund Balance $300 r $200 $100 $0 77 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Vehicle&Eauipment-25 25-00042-004215 DEVELOPMENT FEES-POLICE CAPITAL 16,009 15,450 10,500 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 25-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMITS - 3,500 - 15,040 - - - - - 25-000-42-00-4217 WEATHER WARNING SIREN FEES 408 - 6,000 - - - - - - 25-000-42-00-4218 ENGINEERING CAPITAL FEE - - 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 25-000-42-00-4219 DEVELOPMENT FEES-PW CAPITAL 25,100 33,450 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 25-000-42-00-4220 DEVELOPMENT FEES-PARK CAPITAL 1,650 2,600 3,250 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 2,275 25-000-43-00-4315 DUI FINES 6,462 3,116 6,000 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 3,100 25-000-43-004316 ELECTRONIC CITATION FEES 122 782 650 750 750 750 750 750 750 25-000-43-00-4340 SEIZED VEHICLE PROCEEDS 6,028 2,335 5,000 9,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25-000-44-00-4418 MOWING INCOME 4,897 6,040 20,000 5,632 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 25-000-44-00-4420 POLICE CHARGEBACK - - - - - 56,156 78,792 78,792 78,791 25-000-44-00-4421 PUBLIC WORKS CHARGEBACK - - - 144,650 51,795 51,795 51,795 51,795 25-000-45-00-4520 INVESTMENT EARNINGS-POLICE CAPITAL 55 50 50 25 25 25 25 25 25-000-45-00-4521 INVESTMENT EARNINGS-PW CAPITAL - 22 - 20 - - - - - 25-000-45-00-4522 INVESTMENT EARNINGS-PARK CAPITAL 99 328 250 450 450 450 450 450 450 25-000-46-00-4622 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS-PARK CAPITAL 7,500 10,702 40,000 40,000 50,000 - - - - 25-000-48-00-4882 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS-POLICE CAPITAL 8,900 15,200 1,000 200 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 25-00048-004883 SALE OF FIXED ASSETS-PARKS CAPITAL - 900 - - - - - - - 25-000-48-00-4852 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME-POLICE CAPITAL - - - 25-00048-00-4854 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME-PW CAPITAL 7,283 - - 766 25-00049-00-4922 TRANSFER FROM PARK&REC CAPITAL - 3,500 2,500 2,500 - - - - - Revenue 84,458 97,980 126,200 126,783 259,750 173,051 195,687 195,687 195,686 Police Capital 25-205-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,060 2,647 2,500 3,542 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 1,667 25-205-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 6,433 - 10,000 13,728 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 25-205-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - 2,500 - - - - - - 25-205-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT 1,462 20,000 100,190 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 25-205-60-00-6070 VEHICLES 42,310 - 25,000 39,451 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 53,265 2,647 60,000 156,911 104,667 104,667 104,667 104,667 104,667 78 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Public Works Capital 25-215-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM 3,500 - 15,040 - - - - 25-215-54-00-5448 FILING FEES 49 2,576 6,000 1,862 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 25-215-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 4,000 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 25-215-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 25-215-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT 4,000 75,000 75,000 - - - - - 25-215-60-00-6070 VEHICLES - - - - 30,000 - - - - 185 Wolf Street Building 25-215-92-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 26,544 28,254 30,074 30,074 31,040 33,039 35,168 37,433 39,846 25-215-92-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 55,751 54,041 52,221 52,221 48,755 46,756 44,627 42,362 39,949 86,344 92,371 169,795 180,697 118,295 889295 88,295 88,295 88,295 Parks&Recreation Capital 25-225-60-00-6035 RAINTREE PARK 9,002 - 10,000 - 5,000 - - - - 25-225-60-00-6042 BASEBALL FIELD CONSTRUCTION 15,656 - - - - 25-225-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT - 40,000 12,000 12,000 16,000 - - - 185 Wolf Street Building 25-225-92-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - 972 1,035 1,102 1,173 1,248 25-225-92-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - - 1,528 1,465 1,398 1,327 1,252 25-225-99-00-9921 TRANSFER TO PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL 3,500 2,500 2,500 - - - - - 25-225-99-00-9972 TRANSFER TO LAND CASH - - - - 50,000 - - - - 24,658 3,500 52,500 14,500 69,500 18,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Expenditures 164,267 98,518 282,295 352,108 292,462 211,462 195,462 195,462 1959462 Surplus(Deficit) (79,809) (538) (156,095) (225,325) (32,712) (38,411) 225 225 224 Fund Balance-Police Capital 194,947 229,238 104,737 101,427 22,635 (0) 0 (0) Fund Balance-Public Works Capital 108,743 62,884 (65,159) (62,855) 0 0 0 0 0 Fund Balance-Parks&Rec Capital 51,443 62,473 22,545 90,698 73,923 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 Fund Balance 3559133 354,595 62,123 129,270 96,558 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 79 Debt Service Fund (42) The Debt Service Fund accumulates monies for payment of the 2005A bonds,which were issued to finance road improvement projects. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes - 323,350 326,379 324,762 328,179 329,579 290,732 210,022 129,402 Licenses&Permits 1,025 1,375 1,000 3,969 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Investment Earnings - 283 300 350 300 300 300 300 300 Other Financing Sources 429,404 182,517 99,465 99,465 - - - 82,372 335,254 Total Revenue 430,429 507,525 427,144 428,546 329,479 330,879 292,032 293,694 465,956 Expenditures Contractual Services - 749 963 963 375 375 375 375 375 Debt Service 429,404 427,919 504,407 504,407 328,179 329,579 330,579 336,179 336,179 Total Expenditures 429,404 428,668 505,370 505,370 328,554 329,954 330,954 336,554 336,554 Surplus(Deficit) 1,025 78,857 (78,226) (76,824) 925 925 (38,922) (42,860) 129,402 Ending Fund Balance 8,653 87,510 8,925 10,686 11,611 12,536 (26,386) (69,246) 60,156 $100 Fund Balance N $50 N 3 t $0 r ($50) ($100) 80 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Debt Service-42 42-00040-004006 PROPERTY TAXES-2005A BOND - 323,350 326,379 324,762 328,179 329,579 290,732 210,022 129,402 42-00042-004208 RECAPTURE FEES-WATER&SEWER 1,025 1,375 1,000 3,969 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 42-00045-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - 283 300 350 300 300 300 300 300 42-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 429,404 103,740 99,465 99,465 - - - 82,372 335,254 42-000-49-00-4985 TRANSFER FROM FOX INDUSTRIAL TIF - 78,777 - - - - - - Revenue 430,429 507,525 427,144 428,546 329,479 330,879 292,032 293,694 465,956 42420-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES - 749 963 963 375 375 375 375 375 2004C Bond 42-420-81-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 - - - - - 42-420-81-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 12,825 8,740 4,465 4,465 - - - - - 2005A Bond 42-420-82-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 185,000 195,000 205,000 205,000 215,000 225,000 235,000 250,000 260,000 42-420-82-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 136,579 129,179 121,379 121,379 113,179 104,579 95,579 86,179 76,179 2002 Fox Industrial TIF Bond 421120-98-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - 75,000 75,000 - - - - - 42-420-98-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - 3,563 3,563 - - - - - Expenditures 429,404 428,668 505,370 505,370 328,554 329,954 330,954 336,554 336,554 Surplus(Deficit) 1,025 78,857 (78,226) (76,824) 925 925 (38,922) (42,860) 129,402 Fund Balance 8,653 87,510 8,925 10,686 11,611 12,536 (26,386) (69,246) 60,156 81 Water Fund(51) The Water Fund is an enterprise fund which is comprised of both a capital and operational budget.The capital portion is used for the improvement and expansion of water infrastructure, while the operational side is used to service and maintain City water systems. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes - 133,524 133,454 132,793 43,027 41,959 Licenses&Permits - 11,970 - 54,590 - - - - - Charges for Service 2,503,003 2,580,682 2,527,871 2,799,135 2,458,740 2,487,934 2,517,566 2,547,642 2,578,170 Investment Earnings 1,888 282 300 1,700 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 Reimbursements - 1,771 7,466 8,232 - - - - - Miscellaneous 40,793 43,106 50,000 53,073 54,336 55,632 56,963 58,329 59,731 Other Financing Sources 82,850 83,863 82,288 82,288 82,988 83,588 84,088 84,488 82,288 Total Revenue 2,628,534 2,855,198 2,801,379 3,131,811 2,641,090 2,671,612 2,661,616 2,693,959 2,724,188 Expenses Salaries 346,735 332,461 382,000 362,000 346,131 346,131 346,131 346,131 346,131 Benefits 57,450 56,284 219,720 208,468 191,042 202,285 214,593 223,343 232,617 Contractual Services 493,345 518,831 501,200 542,740 497,450 511,625 526,509 542,137 558,546 Supplies 264,325 267,849 294,124 291,926 301,873 298,734 301,795 305,071 308,576 Capital Outlay - 25,054 132,000 91,305 139,094 157,094 139,094 139,094 139,094 Developer Commitments 275,865 275,865 160,923 160,921 - - - - - Debt Service 834,453 903,277 1,396,016 1,396,016 1,172,802 1,168,384 1,163,054 1,166,825 1,154,236 Total Expenses 2,272,173 2,379,621 3,085,983 3,053,376 2,648,392 2,684,253 2,691,176 2,722,600 2,739,200 Surplus(Deficit) 356,361 475,577 (284,604) 78,435 (7,301) (12,641) (29,560) (28,642) (15,012) Ending Fund Balance Equivalent 825,261 1,300,837 642,452 1,379,272 1,371,971 1,3599330 1,329,770 19301,128 1,286,117 36.32% 54.67% 20.82% 45.17% 51.80% 50.64% 49.41% 47.79% 46.95% N $1,500 Fund Balance Equivalent 3 $1,000 0 s ~ $500 $0 82 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Water-51 51-000-40-00-4007 PROPERTY TAXES-2007A BOND 133,524 133,454 132,793 43,027 41,959 51-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMITS - 11,970 - 54,590 - - - - 51-000-44-00-4424 WATER SALES 1,698,753 1,751,822 1,699,871 1,922,239 1,946,267 1,975,461 2,005,093 2,035,169 2,065,697 51-00044-00-4425 BULK WATER SALES 882 329 500 10,796 500 500 500 500 500 51-000-44-00-4426 LATE PENALTIES-WATER - - - 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 51-000-44-00-4430 WATER METER SALES 22,040 25,365 26,250 26,250 27,563 27,563 27,563 27,563 27,563 51-000-44-00-4440 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE FEE 685,188 696,716 675,000 690,000 334,560 334,560 334,560 334,560 334,560 51-000-44-00-4450 WATER CONNECTION FEES 96,140 106,450 126,250 59,850 59,850 59,850 59,850 59,850 59,850 51-000-44-00-4473 RECAPTURE FEES - - - - - - - - - 51-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1,888 282 300 1,700 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 51-00046-00-4670 REIMB-EMPLOYEE INS CONTRIBUTIONS - - 7,225 7,872 - - - - - 51-000-46-00-4671 REIMB-LIFE INSURANCE - 241 160 51-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS - 1,771 - 200 - - - - - 51-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 32,038 39,491 50,000 53,073 54,336 55,632 56,963 58,329 59,731 51-000-48-00-4821 BAD DEBT RECOVERY 4,437 3,517 - - - - - - - 51-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 4,318 98 - - - - - - - 51-000-49-00-4952 TRANSFER FROM SEWER 82,850 83,863 82,288 82,288 82,988 83,588 84,088 84,488 82,288 Revenue 2,628,534 2,855,198 2,8019379 3,1319811 2,641,090 2,671,612 29661,616 2,693,959 2,724,188 Water Operations 51-510-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 342,790 324,679 370,000 350,000 334,131 334,131 334,131 334,131 334,131 51-510-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 3,945 7,782 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 51-510-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 32,128 31,777 39,852 39,852 38,361 38,361 38,361 38,361 38,361 51-510-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 25,322 24,507 28,200 28,200 25,769 25,769 25,769 25,769 25,769 51-510-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 103,966 103,966 90,661 99,727 109,700 116,282 123,259 51-510-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1,210 1,000 750 758 765 773 780 51-510-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 7,201 6,700 6,166 6,783 7,461 7,909 8,383 51-510-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 829 750 825 908 998 1,058 1,122 51-510-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 6,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 51-510-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE 32,462 24,000 24,510 25,981 27,539 29,192 30,943 83 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 51-510-54-00-5401 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGEBACK 91,863 91,863 - 51-510-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM - 11,970 - 54,590 - - - - - 51-510-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 1,842 330 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 51-510-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 390 287 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 1,600 51-510-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 934 1,172 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 51-510-54-00-5429 WATER SAMPLES 10,265 4,294 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 51-510-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING 1,164 86 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 51-510-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 15,598 19,205 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 24,500 51-510-54-00-5445 TREATMENT FACILITY SERVICES 64,626 85,003 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 51-510-54-00-5448 FILING FEES 4,123 5,888 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 6,200 51-510-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 16,716 17,167 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 51-510-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 899 629 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 51-510-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,695 9,755 8,800 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 51-510-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 51-510-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 262,977 239,606 299,250 270,000 283,500 297,675 312,559 328,187 344,596 51-510-54-00-5483 JULIE SERVICES 2,422 3,426 3,500 3,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 51-510-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 396 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 51-510-54-00-5490 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 3,855 12,832 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 51-510-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES 1,552 1,552 1,600 1,600 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 51-510-54-00-5499 BAD DEBT 10,424 13,370 - 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 51-510-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 2,206 3,045 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 51-510-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 21,468 16,036 21,425 21,425 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 51-510-56-00-5628 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - - - - 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 51-510-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 412 459 4,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 51-510-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 338 560 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 51-510-56-00-5638 TREATMENT FACILITY SUPPLIES 176,762 177,643 165,000 165,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 155,000 51-510-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 995 7,368 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 51-510-56-00-5664 METERS&PARTS 32,136 29,092 46,000 46,000 52,000 46,000 46,000 46,000 46,000 51-510-56-00-5695 GASOLINE 30,008 33,646 38,199 36,001 40,873 43,734 46,795 50,071 53,576 51-510-60-00-6060 EQUIPMENT - - 16,000 16,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 51-510-60-00-6070 VEHICLES - - - - 18,000 - - - 51-510-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - 25,054 116,000 75,305 129,094 129,094 129,094 129,094 129,094 84 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 51-510-75-00-7502 GRANDE RESERVE COURT ORDER 275,865 275,865 160,923 160,921 - - - - Debt Service-2007A Bond 51-510-83-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 51-510-83-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 124,266 123,866 123,454 123,454 123,041 122,423 121,793 121,163 120,525 Debt Service-2002 Capital Appreciation Debt Certificates 51-510-85-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 215,000 285,000 365,000 365,000 - - - - - 51-510-85-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - - - - - - - - Debt Service-2003 Debt Certificates 51-510-86-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 51-510-86-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 33,150 33,150 33,150 33,150 33,150 29,350 25,450 21,450 17,300 Debt Service-2006A Refunding Debt Certificates 51-510-87-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 70,000 70,000 355,000 355,000 405,000 420,000 435,000 460,000 475,000 51-510-87-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 91,306 88,506 219,806 219,806 205,606 189,406 172,606 155,206 136,806 Debt Service-2005C Bond 51-510-88-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 85,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 95,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 110,000 51-510-88-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 80,700 77,725 74,575 74,575 70,975 67,175 63,175 58,975 54,575 Debt Service-IEPA Loan L17-156300 51-510-89-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 83,500 85,600 87,754 87,754 89,961 92,224 94,544 96,923 99,361 51-510-89-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 41,531 39,430 37,277 37,277 35,069 32,806 30,486 28,108 25,669 Expenses 2,272,173 2,379,621 3,085,983 3,053,376 2,648,392 2,684,253 2,691,176 2,722,600 2,739,200 Surplus(Deficit) 356,361 475,577 (284,604) 78,435 (7,301) (12,641) (29,560) (28,642) (15,012) Fund Balance Equiv 825,261 1,300,837 642,452 1,379,272 1,3719971 1,359,330 1,329,770 1,301,128 1,286,117 36.32% 54.67% 20.82% 45.17% 51.80% 50.64% 49.41% 47.79% 46.95% 85 Sewer Fund(52) The Sewer Fund is an enterprise fund which is comprised of both a capital and operational budget. The capital portion is used for improvement and expansion of the sanitary sewer infrastructure while the operational side allows the City to service and maintain sanitary sewer systems. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes - 1,750,206 263,850 262,543 114,940 - Licenses&Permits - 4,000 - 18,000 - - - - - Charges for Service 1,471,981 1,362,022 1,368,380 1,347,769 1,097,560 1,097,560 1,097,560 1,097,560 1,097,560 Investment Earnings 1,517 2,405 3,000 6,200 5,500 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,500 Reimbursements 4,576 1,741 4,587 8,740 - - - - - Other Financing Sources - - - - 1,137,220 1,133,972 1,134,654 1,134,052 1,137,166 Total Revenue 1,478,074 3,120,374 1,639,817 1,643,252 2,355,220 2,237,032 2,237,214 2,236,112 2,239,226 Expenses Salaries 241,621 198,218 212,000 212,000 192,000 192,000 192,000 192,000 192,000 Benefits 40,046 33,563 132,802 126,492 111,144 117,730 124,936 130,100 135,574 Contractual Services 135,927 140,460 73,400 102,400 80,950 83,943 86,785 90,084 93,548 Supplies 51,419 45,381 65,711 69,673 83,206 87,792 92,687 97,915 101,203 Capital Outlay - 25,054 60,000 38,951 66,773 96,773 66,773 66,773 66,773 Developer Commitments 30,996 30,996 180,996 30,996 - - - - - Debt Service 1,252,597 1,416,416 1,088,013 1,088,013 1,968,119 2,054,461 1,865,399 1,865,857 1,877,110 Other Financing Uses 82,850 604,582 82,288 82,288 82,988 83,588 84,088 84,488 82,288 Total Expenses 1,835,456 2,494,670 1,895,210 1,750,812 2,585,179 2,716,285 2,512,666 2,527,216 2,548,495 Surplus(Deficit) (357,382) 625,704 (255,393) (107,560) (229,959) (479,253) (275,452) (291,104) (309,269) Ending Fund Balance Equivalent 2,377,831 3,003,537 2,625,761 2,895,977 2,666,019 2,186,765 1,911,313 1,620,209 1,310,940 129.55% 120.40% 138.55% 165.41% 103.13% 80.51% 76.07% 64.11% 51.44% r $4,000 Fund Balance Equivalent m $3,000 ° $2,000 $1,000 $0 86 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Sewer-52 52-000-40-00-4009 PROPERTY TAXES-2004B BOND 257,989 263,850 262,543 114,940 52-000-40-00-4013 PROPERTY TAXES-2005D BOND 1,382,408 - - - 52-000-40-00-4014 PROPERTY TAXES-2008 BOND 109,809 - 52-000-42-00-4216 BUILD PROGRAM PERMITS 4,000 - 18,000 - - - - 52-000-44-00-4435 SEWER MAINTENANCE FEES 731,743 742,022 728,280 741,255 740,000 740,000 740,000 740,000 740,000 52-000-44-00-4440 SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE FEE - - - - 334,560 334,560 334,560 334,560 334,560 52-000-44-00-4455 SW CONNECTION FEES-OPERATIONS 4,000 4,800 5,100 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 52-000-44-00-4456 SW CONNECTION FEES-CAPITAL 38,000 43,200 35,000 7,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 52-000-44-00-4457 SW CONNECTION FEES-ROB ROY 698,000 572,000 600,000 586,000 - - - - - 52-000-44-00-4462 LATE PENALTIES-SEWER - - - 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 52-000-44-00-4465 RIVER CROSSING FEES 238 514 - - - - - 52-000-44-00-4473 RECAPTURE FEES - - - - - - - - - 52-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 1,517 2,405 3,000 6,200 5,500 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,500 52-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMPLOYEE INS CONTRIBUTIONS - - 4,587 4,637 - - - - - 52-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 4,576 1,741 - 4,103 - - - - - 52-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL - - - - 1,137,220 1,133,972 1,134,654 1,134,052 1,137,166 Revenue 1,478,074 3,120,374 1,639,817 1,643,252 2,355,220 2,237,032 2,237,214 2,236,112 2,239,226 Sewer Operations 52-520-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 241,173 198,017 210,000 210,000 190,000 190,000 190,000 190,000 190,000 52-520-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 448 201 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 52-520-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 22,383 18,927 21,290 21,290 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 21,500 52-520-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 17,663 14,636 18,000 18,000 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 14,500 52-520-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 63,595 63,595 51,500 56,650 62,315 66,054 70,017 52-520-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 537 537 425 429 434 438 442 52-520-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 4,687 4,687 4,240 4,664 5,130 5,438 5,765 52-520-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 532 532 475 523 575 609 646 52-520-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 2,571 2,100 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 52-520-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE - - 21,590 15,750 16,004 16,964 17,982 19,061 20,205 52-520-54-00-5401 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGEBACK 83,045 83,045 - - - - - - - 87 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 52-520-54-00-5405 BUILD PROGRAM 4,000 - 18,000 - - - - - 52-520-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 52-520-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 52-520-54-00-5430 PRINTING&DUPLICATING - - 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 52-520-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1,399 1,699 1,800 1,800 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 52-520-54-00-5444 LIFT STATION SERVICES 5,623 16,541 15,000 15,000 15,750 16,538 17,364 18,233 19,144 52-520-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,022 5,960 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 52-520-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 21,071 19,782 42,000 42,000 44,100 46,305 48,620 51,051 53,604 52-520-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE - 396 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 52-520-54-00-5490 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 4,908 3,997 4,000 12,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 52-520-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES - 2,511 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 2,700 2,700 2,700 52-520-54-00-5499 BAD DEBT 15,859 2,529 - 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 52-520-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 1,830 2,753 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 52-520-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,072 519 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 52-520-56-00-5613 LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE 4,747 1,312 10,000 10,000 10,500 11,025 11,576 12,155 12,763 52-520-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1,891 3,690 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 52-520-56-00-5628 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - - - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 52-520-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 1,354 781 4,500 4,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 52-520-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 879 77 3,000 3,000 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 52-520-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 10,954 5,246 10,000 10,000 26,750 28,623 30,626 32,770 32,770 52-520-56-00-5695 GASOLINE 28,692 31,003 29,211 33,173 31,256 33,444 35,785 38,290 40,970 52-520-60-00-6070 VEHICLES - - - - - 30,000 - - - 52-520-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - 25,054 60,000 38,951 66,773 66,773 66,773 66,773 66,773 52-520-75-00-7500 LENNAR-RAINTREE SEWER RECPATURE 30,996 30,996 30,996 30,996 - - - - - 52-520-75-00-7501 WINDETT RIDGE-SEWER RECAPTURE - - 150,000 - - - - - - Debt Service-2004B Bond 52-520-84-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 155,000 160,000 170,000 170,000 280,000 375,000 395,000 410,000 435,000 52-520-84-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 103,300 98,650 93,850 93,850 88,750 78,950 65,825 52,000 35,600 Debt Service-2003 IRBB Debt Certificates 52-520-90-00.8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 90,000 95,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 105,000 110,000 115,000 120,000 52-520-90-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 73,653 70,143 66,248 66,248 62,048 57,648 52,870 47,755 42,293 Debt Service-2004A Bond 88 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 52-520-91-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 160,000 170,000 175,000 175,000 180,000 190,000 52-520-91-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 28,573 24,093 18,738 18,738 13,050 6,840 - - - Debt Service-2011 Refunding Bond 52-520-92-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - 660,000 685,000 715,000 745,000 780,000 52-520-92-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 225,354 318,147 318,147 477,220 448,972 419,654 389,052 357,166 Debt Service-2005D Bond 52-520-93-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - - - - - - 52-520-93-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 385,950 332,346 Debt Service-2008 Refunding Bond 52-520-94-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - 52-520-94-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 110,090 94,800 - - Debt Service-IEPA Loan L17-013000 52-520-95-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 35,357 36,635 37,958 37,958 52-520-95-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 3,623 2,345 1,022 1,022 - - - - - Debt Service-IEPA Loan L17-115300 52-520-96-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 84,107 86,329 88,610 88,610 90,952 93,355 95,821 98,353 100,952 52-520-96-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 22,944 20,721 18,440 18,440 16,099 13,696 11,229 8,697 6,099 52-520-99-00-9951 TRANSFER TO WATER 82,850 83,863 82,288 82,288 82,988 83,588 84,088 84,488 82,288 52-520-99-00-9999 TRANSFER TO 2011 BOND ESCROW - 520,719 - - - - - - - Expenses 1,835,456 2,494,670 1,895,210 1,750,812 2,585,179 2,716,285 2,512,666 2,527,216 2,548,495 Surplus(Deficit) (357,382) 625,704 (255,393) (107,560) (229,959) (479,253) (2759452) (291,104) (309,269) Fund Balance Equiv 29377,831 3,003,537 2,625,761 2,895,977 2,666,019 29186,765 1,911,313 1,620,209 1,310,940 129.55% 120.40% 138.55% 165.41% 103.13% 80.51% 76.07% 64.11% 51.44% 89 Land Cash Fund (72) Land-Cash funds are dedicated by developers through the contribution ordinance to serve the immediate and future needs of park and recreation of residents in new subdivisions.Land for park development and cash spent on recreational facilities is often matched through grant funding to meet the community's recreation needs at a lower cost to the City. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Intergovernmental 42,285 400,000 400,000 400,000 96,000 - - 400,000 - Land Cash Contributions 432,354 30,767 20,500 52,106 20,500 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Other Financing Sources - - - - 50,000 - - - - Total Revenue 474,639 430,767 420,500 452,106 166,500 23,000 23,000 423,000 23,000 Expenditures Contractual Services 60,449 20,084 - - - - - - - Capital Outlay 197,470 316,836 323,825 72,247 89,000 356,850 263,000 13,000 63,000 Total Expenditures 257,919 336,920 323,825 72,247 89,000 356,850 263,000 13,000 63,000 Surplus(Deficit) 216,720 93,847 96,675 379,859 77,500 (333,850) (240,000) 410,000 (40,000) Ending Fund Balance (388,625) (294,778) (172,534) 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) Fund Balance $200 r H $0 3 F ($200) ($400) ($600) 90 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Land Cash-72 72-000-41-00-4170 STATE GRANTS 42,285 - 72-000-41-00-4171 OSLAD GRANT-PRAIRIE MEADOWS - 400,000 - - 72-00041-004173 OSLAD GRANT-RAINTREE - 400,000 400,000 - 72-00041-004174 RTP GRANT-CLARK PARK - - 96,000 - 72-000-41-004175 OSLAD GRANT-RIVERFRONT GRANT - 400,000 72-000-47-00-4701 WHITE OAK UNIT 3&4 - - 72-000-47-00-4702 WHISPERING MEADOWS(K HILL) 312,655 - - - - - - - 72-000-47-00-4703 AUTUMN CREEK 18,460 30,767 20,000 50,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 72-000-47-00-4704 BLACKBERRY WOODS 568 - 500 568 500 500 500 500 500 72-000-47-00-4705 BRISTOL BAY 100,000 - - - - - - - 72-000-47-00-4706 CALEDONIA - 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 72-000-47-00-4707 RIVER'S EDGE 671 - - - - - - 72-000-47-00-4708 COUNTRY HILLS - 1,538 72-000-49-00-4925 TRANSFER FROM VEHICLE&EQUIPMENT - - - - 50,000 - - - - Revenue 474,639 430,767 420,500 452,106 166,500 23,000 23,000 4239000 23,000 72-720-54-00-5401 ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGEBACK 60,449 20,084 - - - - - - - 72-720-60-00-6032 MOSIER HOLDING COSTS 10,000 11,000 12,000 12,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,000 72-720-60-00-6036 RAINTREE VILLAGE 88,175 305,836 191,825 40,247 - - - - - 72-720-60-00-6038 WHEATON WOODS NATURE TRAIL 213 - - - 72-720-60-00-6039 BRISTOL BAY-PARK A 85,062 72-720-60-00-6043 BRISTOL BAY REGIONAL PARK 14,020 - - - 72-720-60-00-6044 CLARK PARK - 120,000 20,000 76,000 - - 72-720-60-00-6045 RIVERFRONT PARK - - - 200,000 200,000 72-720-60-00-6046 GRANDE RESERVE PARK A - 50,000 72-720-60-00-6047 GRANDE RESERVE PARK B 143,850 - 91 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 72-720-60-00-6049 RAINTREE PARK C - - - - - - - - 50,000 Expenditures 257,919 336,920 323,825 72,247 89,000 356,850 263,000 13,000 63,000 Surplus(Deficit) 216,720 93,847 96,675 379,859 77,500 (333,850) (240,000) 410,000 (40,000) Fund Balance (388,625) (294,778) (172,534) 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) 92 Parks and Recreation Fund (79) This fund accounts for the daily operations of the Parks and Recreation Department. Programs,classes,special events and maintenance of City wide park land and public facilities make up the day to day operations. Programs and classes consist of a wide variety of options serving children through senior citizens. Special events range from Music Under the Stars to Home Town Days. City wide maintenance consists of over two hundred acres at more than fifty sites including buildings,boulevards,parks,utility locations and natural areas. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Charges for Service 220,962 265,699 220,000 248,500 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 Investment Earnings 301 175 200 250 200 200 200 200 200 Reimbursements 7,329 3,336 11,661 12,265 - - - - - Miscellaneous 186,780 193,688 263,700 202,235 223,000 223,000 223,000 223,000 232,700 Other Financing Sources 951,890 736,710 955,886 955,886 1,765,504 1,110,111 1,192,708 1,217,069 1,229,444 Total Revenue 1,367,262 1,199,608 1,451,447 1,419,136 2,228,704 1,573,311 1,655,908 1,680,269 1,702,344 Expenditures Salaries 687,511 651,906 702,800 665,800 782,469 783,969 785,544 787,198 788,934 Benefits 109,114 107,010 296,477 302,766 332,398 352,014 373,590 387,836 402,936 Contractual Services 126,382 147,598 177,530 161,630 227,280 222,530 196,993 201,678 206,598 Supplies 237,847 244,584 329,960 275,962 291,650 293,358 295,186 297,141 299,233 Other Financing Uses - - - - 556,957 - - - - Total Expenditures 1,160,854 1,151,098 1,506,767 1,406,158 2,190,754 1,651,871 1,651,312 1,673,853 1,697,702 Surplus(Deficit) 206,408 48,510 (55,320) 12,978 37,950 (78,560) 4,596 6,416 4,642 Ending Fund Balance 231,558 280,065 185,635 293,043 330,993 252,433 257,029 263,445 268,088 19.95% 24.33% 12.32% 20.84% 15.11% 15.28% 15.57% 15.74% 15.79% $400 Fund Balance m $300 =2 $200 $100 $0 93 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Parks and Recreation-79 79-00044-00-4402 SPECIAL EVENTS 6,935 18,095 33,500 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 79-000-44-00-4403 CHILD DEVELOPMENT 41,756 58,810 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 79-000-44-00-4404 ATHLETICS&FITNESS - 124,164 113,095 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 79-000-44-00-4439 PROGRAM FEES 189,890 53,905 - - - - - - - 79-00044-004441 CONCESSION REVENUE 31,072 38,939 30,000 35,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 79-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 301 175 200 250 200 200 200 200 200 79-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMPLOYEE INS CONTRIBUTIONS - - 11,661 12,265 - - - - - 79-000-46-00-4690 REIMB-MISCELLANEOUS 7,329 3,336 - - - - - - - 79-00048-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 22,471 54,240 48,000 50,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 79-000-48-00-4825 PARK RENTALS - 27,143 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 79-000-48-00-4843 HOMETOWN DAYS 137,142 100,960 175,000 119,235 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 79-000-48-004846 SPONSORSHIPS&DONATIONS 7,445 4,314 14,700 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 14,700 79-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 19,722 7,031 1,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 79-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL 951,890 736,710 955,886 955,886 1,765,504 1,110,111 1,192,708 1,217,069 1,229,444 Revenue 1,367,262 1,199,608 1,451,447 1,419,136 2,228,704 19573,311 1,655,908 1,680,269 1,702,344 Parks Department 79-790-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 355,091 369,514 410,000 400,000 434,602 434,602 434,602 434,602 434,602 79-790-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 15,969 16,833 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 79-790-50-00-5020 OVERTIME 439 50 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 79-790-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRI3UTION 32,914 35,461 43,693 43,693 48,498 48,498 48,498 48,498 48,498 79-790-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 27,503 28,869 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 34,000 79-790-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 126,842 126,842 111,307 122,438 134,681 142,762 151,328 79-790-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1,208 1,208 1,000 1,010 1,020 1,030 1,041 79-790-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 9,179 9,179 10,232 11,255 12,381 13,124 13,911 79-790-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - 1,104 1,104 1,104 1,214 1,336 1,416 1,501 79-790-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 309 2,604 2,600 2,600 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 79-790-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 332 750 750 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 79-790-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1,802 3,330 3,780 3,780 4,780 4,780 4,780 4,780 4,780 94 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 79-790-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,323 4,748 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 79-790-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES 1,749 3,701 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 79-790-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 188 2,017 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 79-790-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE - - 17,500 17,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 79-790-56-00-5600 WEARING APPAREL 4,031 4,123 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 79-790-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 152 293 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 79-790-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 11,232 23,528 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 22,500 79-790-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 1,785 2,374 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 79-790-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 79-790-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 44,231 51,312 50,500 50,500 50,500 50,500 50,500 50,500 50,500 79-790-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - - 20,000 20,000 21,400 22,898 24,501 26,216 28,051 500,718 5499089 781,806 771,806 806,573 820,345 835,449 846,078 857,362 Recreation Department 79-795-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 248,541 197,710 185,000 200,000 245,067 245,067 245,067 245,067 245,067 79-795-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 12,708 17,013 25,000 10,500 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 79-795-50-00-5020 OVERTIME - - 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 79-795-50-00-5045 CONCESSION WAGES 9,021 11,542 12,500 10,000 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 79-795-50-00-5046 PRE-SCHOOL WAGES 23,085 22,476 25,000 15,000 30,000 31,500 33,075 34,729 36,465 79-795-50-00-5052 INSTRUCTORS WAGES 22,657 16,768 25,000 10,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 79-795-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 24,798 23,137 19,884 24,300 27,300 27,300 27,300 27,300 27,300 79-795-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 23,899 19,543 16,000 18,034 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 79-795-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 41,094 41,094 67,943 74,737 82,211 87,144 92,372 79-795-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 473 450 600 606 612 618 624 79-795-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 2,675 2,566 4,839 5,323 5,855 6,207 6,579 79-795-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE - - 325 296 575 633 696 737 782 79-795-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 680 581 2,000 2,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 79-795-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - 369 1,000 1,000 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 79-795-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 27,872 27,026 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 79-795-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 5,517 2,847 4,300 3,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 79-795-54-00-5447 SCHOLARSHIPS 221 685 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 79-795-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 7,006 3,128 8,000 2,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 95 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 79-795-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 482 1,375 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 79-795-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 49,076 73,265 60,000 60,000 65,000 68,250 71,663 75,246 79,008 79-795-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 21,229 9,538 23,100 15,000 20,000 21,000 22,050 23,153 24,310 79-795-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 2,459 2,558 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 79-795-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 1,387 106 1,000 500 40,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 79-795-54-00-5496 PROGRAM REFUNDS 3,082 9,388 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 79-795-54-00-5497 PROPERTY TAX PAYMENT - - - - - 30,000 - - - 79-795-56-00-5602 HOMETOWN DAYS SUPPLIES 99,903 84,982 140,000 91,712 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 79-795-56-00-5606 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 47,154 47,065 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 79-795-56-00-5607 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 17,834 19,144 18,000 15,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 18,000 79-795-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,466 1,792 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 79-795-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 4,138 6,533 5,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 79-795-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 283 - 2,000 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 79-795-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 2,600 1,522 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 79-795-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 412 920 2,000 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 79-795-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS - - 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 79-795-56-00-5690 SUPPLIES-GRANT REIMBURSABLE - - 500 - - - - - - 79-795-56-00-5695 GASOLINE 1,626 996 3,210 1,500 3,000 3,210 3,435 3,675 3,932 79-795-99-00-9980 TRANSFER TO RECREATION CENTER - - - - 556,957 - - - - 660,136 602,009 724,961 634,352 1,384,181 831,526 815,863 827,775 840,340 Expenditures 1,160,854 19151,098 1,506,767 1,406,158 2,190,754 1,651,871 1,651,312 1,673,853 1,697,702 Surplus(Deficit) 206,408 48,510 (55,320) 12,978 37,950 (789560) 4,596 6,416 4,642 Fund Balance 231,558 280,065 185,635 293,043 330,993 252,433 257,029 263,445 268,088 19.95% 24.33% 12.32% 20.84% 15.11% 15.28% 15.57% 15.74% 15.79% 96 Recreation Center Fund (80) The REC Center is a 38,000 square foot,full-service fitness and recreation facility leased by the City and operated by the Parks and Recreation Department. This fund is scheduled to be closed out in fiscal year 2014. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Charges for Service 608,154 620,489 607,000 498,750 61,000 - - - - Miscellaneous 11,864 14,074 15,500 14,456 - - - - - Other Financing Sources - - - - 556,957 - - - - Total Revenue 620,018 634,563 622,500 513,206 617,957 - - - - Expenses Salaries 224,988 201,757 223,000 174,250 20,000 - - - - Benefits 28,603 25,706 29,212 29,179 - - - - - Contractual Services 384,218 392,972 408,250 476,050 114,250 - - - - Supplies 49,451 39,041 43,171 81,194 16,239 - - - - Total Expenses 687,260 659,476 703,633 760,673 150,489 - - - - Surplus(Deficit) (67,242) (24,913) (81,133) (247,467) 467,468 - - - - Ending Fund Balance Equivalent (195,087) (220,001) (367,521) (467,468) 0 0 0 0 0 -28.39% -33.36% -52.23% -61.45% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Fund Balance Equivalent r $200 M $0 0 ($200) ($400) ($600) 97 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Recreation Center 80-000-44-00-4439 PROGRAM FEES 130,565 97,070 100,000 60,000 - 80-000-44-00-4441 CONCESSION REVENUE 14,692 10,661 12,500 6,500 500 80-000-44-00-4444 MEMBERSHIP FEES 418,685 465,488 450,000 400,000 60,000 80-000-44-00-4445 GUEST FEES 7,072 8,939 7,000 6,500 500 80-000-44-00-4446 SWIM CLASS FEES 27,013 30,932 25,000 20,000 - 80-000-44-00-4447 PERSONAL TRAINING FEES 8,055 4,910 10,000 5,000 80-000-44-00-4448 TANNING SESSION FEES 2,072 2,489 2,500 750 80-000-48-004820 RENTAL INCOME 7,103 13,017 13,000 13,000 80-000-48-004846 SCHOLARSHIPS&DONATIONS 3,170 760 2,000 1,356 80-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 1,591 297 500 100 - 80-000-49-00-4979 TRANSFER FROM PARKS&REC - - - - 556,957 Revenue 620,018 634,563 622,500 513,206 617,957 - - - - 80-800-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 33,542 29,087 28,000 26,250 - 80-800-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES 96,666 88,234 100,000 78,000 20,000 80-800-50-00-5046 PRE-SCHOOL WAGES 38,362 30,255 35,000 15,000 - 80-800-50-00-5052 INSTRUCTORS WAGES 56,418 54,181 60,000 55,000 80-800-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 11,529 10,213 10,181 10,181 80-800-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 17,074 15,493 17,708 17,708 80-800-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE - - 1,200 1,200 80-800-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 123 90 80-800-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE - - 80-800-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 80-800-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES - - 80-800-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING - - 200 80-800-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 732 192 1,500 - - 80-800-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 4,349 3,198 3,600 3,600 720 80-800-54-00-5447 SCHOLARSHIPS 389 - - - - 80-800-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING - - 600 300 60 80-800-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 114 200 200 40 98 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 80-800-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32,851 15,810 20,000 15,000 3,000 80-800-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 55,117 46,030 55,650 55,650 11,130 80-800-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 215,000 223,647 236,000 330,000 38,000 80-800-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 13,627 37,751 15,000 7,000 1,400 80-800-54-00-5496 PROGRAM REFUNDS 8,473 4,727 5,500 5,500 1,100 80-800-54-00-5497 PROPERTY TAX PAYMENT 53,680 61,503 70,000 58,800 58,800 80-800-56-00-5606 PROGRAM SUPPLIES 11,676 12,125 15,000 7,500 1,500 80-800-56-00-5607 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 10,029 6,302 7,000 7,000 1,400 80-800-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,730 892 2,600 1,500 300 80-800-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 4,543 7,039 6,200 3,000 600 80-800-56-00-5630 SMALL TOOLS&EQUIPMENT 8,525 - - - - 80-800-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 3,180 1,000 1,000 1,000 200 80-800-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 9,768 11,371 11,000 61,000 12,200 80-800-56-00-5645 BOOKS&PUBLICATIONS - 30 50 194 39 80-800-56-00-5695 GASOLINE - 282 321 - - Expenses 687,260 659,476 703,633 760,673 150,489 - - - - Surplus(Deficit) (67,242) (24,913) (81,133) (247,467) 467,468 - - - - Fund Balance Equiv (195,087) (220,001) (367,521) (467,468) 0 0 0 0 0 -28.39% -33.36% -52.23% -61.45% - 99 Library Operations Fund(82) The Yorkville Public Library provides the people of the community,from pre-school through maturity,with access to a collection of books and other materials which will serve their educational,cultural and recreational needs. The Library board and staff strive to provide the community an environment that promotes the love of reading. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 1,252,191 692,476 707,500 691,905 670,415 700,000 700,000 700,000 725,000 Intergovernmental 24,410 22,212 22,200 23,852 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 Licenses&Permits 17,650 4,681 - - - - - - - Fines&Forfeits 14,161 12,864 13,000 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 Charges for Service 17,117 15,368 17,000 13,450 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Investment Earnings 690 393 150 1,260 1,300 1,300 1,500 1,500 1,500 Reimbursements - - 7,306 9,396 - - - - - Miscellaneous 7,823 15,045 8,500 8,940 9,250 9,250 9,250 9,250 9,250 Other Financing Sources - 332,500 41,978 30,000 52,174 32,375 34,168 36,068 38,082 Total Revenue 1,334,042 1,095,539 817,634 788,103 778,639 788,425 790,418 792,318 819,332 Expenditures Salaries 501,353 432,008 440,000 440,000 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 Benefits 143,220 149,612 218,553 200,412 190,977 202,485 215,076 224,105 233,675 Contractual Services 149,678 88,124 111,599 108,149 109,049 109,679 110,341 111,035 111,764 Supplies 180,831 21,623 21,750 22,750 21,250 21,250 21,250 21,250 21,250 Contingencies 6,705 158 1,000 - - - - - - Debt Service 605,925 - - - Other Financing Uses - 332,519 1,511 5,469 - - - - - Total Expenditures 1,587,712 1,0249044 794,413 776,780 7689816 7809954 794,206 803,930 814,230 Surplus(Deficit) (253,670) 71,495 23,221 11,323 9,823 7,471 (3,789) (11,612) 5,102 Ending Fund Balance 317,336 3889831 370,330 400,154 409,977 4179448 413,659 402,047 4079149 19.99% 37.97% 46.62% 51.51% 53.33% 53.45% 52.08% 50.01% 50.00% Fund Balance $500 $400 ♦ • •�� • 'o $300 i ~ $200 $100 $0 100 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Library Operations 82-00040-004005 PROPERTY TAXES-LIBRARY 648,060 673,145 700,000 691,905 670,415 700,000 700,000 700,000 725,000 82-000-40-00-4085 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX INDUSTRIAL TIF - 19,331 7,500 - - - - - - 82-000-40-00-4015 PROPERTY TAXES-DEBT SERVICE 604,131 - - - - - - - - 82-000-41-00-4120 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX 7,217 4,981 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 82-000-41-00-4170 STATE GRANTS 17,193 17,231 17,200 18,852 17,200 17,200 17,200 17,200 17,200 82-000-42-00-4211 DEVELOPMENT FEES-BOOKS 8,825 4,681 - - - - - - - 82-000-42-00-4212 DEVELOPMENT FEES-BUILDING 8,825 - - - - - - - - 82-000-43-00-4330 LIBRARY FINES 14,161 12,864 13,000 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 82-000-44-00-4401 LIBRARY SUBSCRIPTION CARDS 13,742 11,814 12,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 82-000-44-00-4422 COPY FEES 3,339 3,444 3,000 2,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 82-000-44-00-4440 PROGRAM FEES 36 110 2,000 950 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 82-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 690 393 150 1,260 1,300 1,300 1,500 1,500 1,500 82-000-46-00-4670 REIMB-EMPLOYEE INS CONTRIBUTIONS - - 6,670 8,685 - - - - - 82-000-46-00-4671 REIMB-LIFE INSURANCE - - 636 711 - - - - - 82-000-48-00-4820 RENTAL INCOME 1,454 2,695 2,000 1,540 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 82-000-48-00-4824 DVD RENTAL INCOME 4,131 5,416 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 82-000-48-004832 MEMORIALS 1,883 6,119 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 82-000-48-00-4850 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 55 815 - 400 250 250 250 250 250 82-000-48-00-4881 SALE OF BOOKS 300 - - - - - - - 82-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL - - - - 21,490 - - - - 82-000-49-00-4901 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL - 332,500 41,978 30,000 30,684 32,375 34,168 36,068 38,082 Revenue 1,334,042 1,095,539 817,634 788,103 778,639 7889425 790,418 7929318 819,332 82-820-50-00-5010 SALARIES&WAGES 501,353 244,695 245,000 245,000 252,540 252,540 252,540 252,540 252,540 82-820-50-00-5015 PART-TIME SALARIES - 187,313 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 82-820-52-00-5212 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION 21,607 23,387 26,692 26,692 27,988 27,988 27,988 27,988 27,988 82-820-52-00-5214 FICA CONTRIBUTION 37,766 32,384 38,000 33,000 33,572 33,572 33,572 33,572 33,572 82-820-52-00-5216 GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE 76,487 86,334 102,877 102,877 90,838 99,922 109,914 116,509 123,499 82-820-52-00-5222 GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1,200 760 1,410 1,100 625 631 638 644 650 82-820-52-00-5223 DENTAL INSURANCE 5,451 6,061 6,826 6,100 6,545 7,200 7,919 8,395 8,898 101 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 82-820-52-00-5224 VISION INSURANCE 709 686 770 643 725 798 877 930 986 82-820-52-00-5230 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE - - 4,286 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 82-820-52-00-5231 LIABILITY INSURANCE - 37,692 27,500 28,184 29,875 31,668 33,568 35,582 82-820-54-00-5412 TRAINING&CONFERENCES 949 - - 500 500 500 500 500 500 82-820-54-00-5415 TRAVEL&LODGING 593 215 500 1,000 600 600 600 600 600 82-820-54-00-5423 PUBLIC RELATIONS 112 - - - - - - - - 82-820-54-00-5426 PUBLISHING&ADVERTISING 130 - 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 82-820-54-00-5440 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 9,055 8,609 8,500 10,500 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 82-820-54-00-5452 POSTAGE&SHIPPING 2,104 538 1,000 300 500 500 500 500 500 82-820-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS 11,290 7,495 14,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 82-820-54-00-5462 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 31,824 29,909 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 82-820-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES 4,175 - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 82-820-54-00-5468 AUTOMATION 48,567 28,210 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 82-820-54-00-5480 UTILITIES 11,484 8,872 15,750 12,000 12,600 13,230 13,892 14,586 15,315 82-820-54-00-5485 RENTAL&LEASE PURCHASE 1,007 - - - - - - - - 82-820-54-00-5495 OUTSIDE REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 28,388 4,276 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 82-820-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES - - 749 749 749 749 749 749 749 82-820-56-00-5610 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8,784 5,005 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 82-820-56-00-5620 OPERATING SUPPLIES 6,995 4,694 7,500 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 82-820-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE 7,637 - - 1,550 - - - - - 82-820-56-00-5640 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 2,180 - - - - - - - - 82-820-56-00-5671 LIBRARY PROGRAMMING 8,172 225 2,000 950 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 82-820-56-00-5676 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 93 - - - - - - - - 82-820-56-00-5680 ADULT BOOKS 30,312 82-820-56-00-5681 JUVENILE BOOKS 40,713 82-820-56-00-5682 REFERENCE BOOKS 11,394 82-820-56-00-5683 AUDIO BOOKS 9,526 82-820-56-00-5684 COMPACT DISCS&OTHER MUSIC 2,122 - - - - - - - - 82-820-56-00-5685 DVD'S 7,715 1,260 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 82-820-56-00-5686 DEVELOPMENT FEES 42,766 4,681 - - - - - - - 82-820-56-00-5698 MEMORIALS&GIFTS 1,622 5,627 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 82-820-56-00-5699 MISCELLANEOUS 800 131 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 102 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected 82-820-70-00-7799 CONTINGENCIES 6,705 158 1,000 Debt Service-2005B Bond 82-820-83-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 75,000 - - 82-820-83-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 319,125 Debt Service-2006 Bond 82-820-84-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 150,000 82-820-84-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 61,800 - - 82-820-99-00-9983 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY DEBT SERVICE - - 1,511 5,469 82-820-99-00-9984 TRANSFER TO LIBRARY CAPITAL - 332,519 - - - - - - - Expenditures 1,587,712 1,024,044 794,413 776,780 768,816 780,954 794,206 803,930 814,230 Surplus(Deficit) (253,670) 71,495 23,221 11,323 9,823 7,471 (3,789) (11,612) 59102 Fund Balance 317,336 388,831 370,330 400,154 409,977 417,448 413,659 402,047 407,149 19.99% 37.97% 46.62% 51.51% 53.33% 53.45% 52.08% 50.01% 50.00% 103 Library Debt Service Fund (83) The Library Debt Service Fund accumulates monies for payment of the 2005B and 2006 bonds,which were issued to finance construction of the Library building. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes - 718,839 795,488 791,640 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Investment Earnings - 140 300 200 200 200 200 200 200 Other Financing Sources - - 1,511 5,469 - - - - - Total Revenue - 718,979 797,299 797,309 771,963 716,388 734,513 737,038 744,263 Expenditures Debt Service - 720,800 795,488 795,488 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Total Expenditures - 720,800 795,488 795,488 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Surplus(Deficit) - (1,821) 1,811 1,821 200 200 200 200 200 Ending Fund Balance - (1,821) - 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 $2 Fund Balance $1 r $0 (S1) ($2) 104 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Library Debt Service 83-00040-004015 PROPERTY TAXES-DEBT SERVICE 718,839 795,488 791,640 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 83-00045-004500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 140 300 200 200 200 200 200 200 83-00049-00-4982 TRANSFER FROM LIBRARY OPS - 1,511 5,469 - - - - - Revenue 718,979 797,299 797,309 771,963 716,388 734,513 737,038 744,263 Debt Service-2005B Bond 83-830-83-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 175,000 290,000 290,000 50,875 - - - - 83-830-83-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 316,125 309,125 309,125 290,162 - - - - Debt Service-2006 Bond 83-830-84-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 175,000 150,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 83-830-84-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 54,675 46,363 46,363 39,238 34,488 32,113 29,738 27,363 Debt Service-2013 Refunding Bond 83-830-99-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - 185,000 475,000 505,000 520,000 540,000 83-830-99-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - - 106,488 156,700 147,200 137,100 126,700 Expenditures - 720,800 795,488 795,488 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Surplus(Deficit) - (1,821) 1,811 1,821 200 200 200 200 200 Fund Balance 0 (1,821) 0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 105 Library Capital Fund (84) The Library Capital Fund derives its revenue from monies collected from building permits. The revenue is used for Library building maintenance and associated capital,contractual and supply purchases. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Licenses&Permits - 17,669 16,250 30,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Investment Earnings - 71 100 10 20 20 20 20 20 Other Financing Sources - 332,519 - - - - - - - Total Revenue - 350,259 16,350 30,010 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 Expenditures Contractual Services - - - 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 Supplies - - 13,474 14,474 35,350 16,520 16,520 16,520 16,520 Capital Outlay - 10,965 - - - - - - - Other Financing Uses - 332,500 - - - - - - - Total Expenditures - 343,465 13,474 17,974 38,850 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 Surplus(Deficit) - 6,794 2,876 12,036 (18,830) - - - - Ending Fund Balance - 6,794 - 18,830 - - - - - Fund Balance $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 106 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Library Capital 84-000-42-00-4214 DEVELOPMENT FEES 17,669 16,250 30,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 84-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 71 100 10 20 20 20 20 20 84-000-49-00-4982 TRANSFER FROM LIBRARY OPS 332,519 - - - - - - - Revenue - 350,259 16,350 30,010 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 84-840-54-00-5460 DUES&SUBSCRIPTIONS - - 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500 84-840-56-00-5635 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT&SOFTWARE - - - - - - - 84-840-56-00-5686 BOOKS 13,474 13,474 35,350 16,520 16,520 16,520 16,520 84-840-56-00-5683 AUDIO BOOKS - - - - - - - 84-840-56-00-5684 COMPACT DISCS&OTHER MUSIC - 84-840-56-00-5685 DVD'S - 1,000 84-840-60-00-6020 BUILDINGS&STRUCTURES 10,965 - 84-840-99-00-9901 TRANSFER TO GENERAL 332,500 - - - - - - - Expenditures - 343,465 tom: 17,974 38,850 20,020 20,020 20,020 20,020 Surplus(Deficit) - 6,794 " 12,036 (18,830) - - - - Fund Balance 6,794 18,830 107 Fox Industrial TIF Fund (85) The Fox Industrial TIF was created in 2001,in order to finance public infrastructure improvements for the Fox Industrial area. This TIF was closed out in fiscal year 2012. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 228,346 259,052 - - - - - - Investment Earnings 13 275 - - - - - - Total Revenue 228,359 259,327 - - - - - - - Expenditures Contractual Services 1,989 662,322 - - - - - - Supplies - 11,236 - - - - - - Debt Service 79,933 76,783 - - - - - - Other Financing Uses - 78,777 - - - - - - - Total Expenditures 81,922 829,118 - - - - - - - Surplus(Deficit) 146,437 (569,791) - - - - - - Ending Fund Balance 569,790 - - - - - - - - r $600 Fund Balance $400 0 $200 $0 108 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Fox Industrial TIF 85-00040-004085 PROPERTY TAXES-FOX INDUSTRIAL TIF 228,346 259,052 85-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 13 275 Revenue 228,359 259,327 - - - - 85-850-54-00-5400 TIF LIQUIDATION - 658,757 - 85-850-54-00-5420 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 1,989 3,565 85-850-56-00-5619 SIGNS - 11,236 - Debt Service-2002 Bond 85-850-98-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 70,000 70,000 85-850-98-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 9,933 6,783 - - 85-850-99-00-9901 TRANSFER TO GENERAL - 85-850-99-00-9942 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE - 78,777 - - Expenditures 81,922 829,118 - - - - - - Surplus(Deficit) 146,437 (569,791) - - - - - - Fund Balance 569,790 - - - - - - - - 109 Countryside TIF Fund (87) The Countryside TIF was created in February of 2005,with the intent of constructing a future retail development at Countryside Center. This TIF is located at the northwest corner of US Route 34 and IL Route 47. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 6,372 4,188 4,500 - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Investment Earnings 3,134 2,718 2,000 3,100 1,550 - - - - Total Revenue 9,506 6,906 6,500 3,100 1,550 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Expenditures Contractual Services 1,623 1,442 1,375 2,375 1,802,375 2,375 2,375 2,375 2,375 Debt Service 307,093 306,143 304,668 304,668 285,788 119,073 119,073 119,073 119,073 Total Expenditures 308,716 307,585 306,043 307,043 2,088,163 121,448 121,448 121,448 121,448 Surplus(Deficit) (299,210) (300,679) (299,543) (303,943) (2,086,613) (121,448) (21,448) (21,448) (21,448) Ending Fund Balance 2,178,550 1,877,872 1,578,277 1,573,929 (512,684) (634,131) (655,579) (677,026) (698,474) $3,000 Fund Balance N r m $2,000 ♦!. - N 3 $1,000 F $0 ($1,000) 110 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Countryside TIF 87-00040-00-4087 PROPERTY TAXES-COUNTRYSIDE TIF 6,372 4,188 4,500 - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 87-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 3,134 2,718 2,000 3,100 1,550 - - - Revenue 9,506 6,906 6,500 3,100 1,550 - 100,000 100,000 100,000 87-870-54-00-5420 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 1,248 1,067 1,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 87-870-54-00-5425 TIF INCENTIVE PAYOUT - - - - 1,800,000 - - - - 87-870-54-00-5498 PAYING AGENT FEES 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 375 Debt Service-2005 Bond 87-870-80-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT 170,000 175,000 180,000 180,000 185,000 - - - - 87-870-80-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT 137,093 131,143 124,668 124,668 75,288 68,073 68,073 68,073 68,073 Debt Service-2013 Refunding Bond 87-870-93-00-8000 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - - - - - - - - - 87-870-93-00-8050 INTEREST PAYMENT - - 25,500 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 Expenditures 308,716 307,585 306,043 307,043 29088,163 121,448 121,448 121,448 121,448 Surplus(Deficit) (299,210) (300,679) (299,543) (303,943) (2,086,613) (121,448) (21,448) (21,448) (21,448) Fund Balance 291789550 1,8779872 1,5789277 1,573,929 (5129684) (634,131) (6559579) (6779026) (698,474) 111 Downtown TIF Fund (88) The Downtown TIF was created in 2006,in order to finance a mixed use development in the downtown area. FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 75,362 67,807 70,000 39,980 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Investment Earnings - 126 150 350 350 350 350 350 350 Total Revenue 75,362 67,933 70,150 40,330 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 Expenditures Contractual Services 1,896 12,152 11,500 15,167 15,350 15,355 15,360 15,365 15,375 Capital Outlay - 7,589 30,000 21,667 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total Expenditures 1,896 19,741 41,500 36,834 45,350 45,355 45,360 45,365 45,375 Surplus(Deficit) 73,466 48,192 28,650 3,496 (10,000) (10,005) (10,010) (10,015) (10,025) Ending Fund Balance 209,760 257,953 264,867 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 r $300 Fund Balance `i $zoo 0 L ~ $100 $0 112 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Downtown TIF 88-000-40-00-4088 PROPERTY TAXES-DOWNTOWN TIF 75,362 67,807 70,000 39,980 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 88-000-45-00-4500 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - 126 150 350 350 350 350 350 350 Revenue 75,362 67,933 70,150 40,330 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 35,350 88-880-54-00-5420 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 1,896 366 1,500 167 350 355 360 365 375 88-880-54-00-5466 LEGAL SERVICES - 11,786 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 88-880-54-00-5425 TIF INCENTIVE PAYOUT - - - - - - - - 88-880-60-00-6000 PROJECT COSTS 7,589 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 88-880-60-00-6079 ROUTE 47 EXPANSION - - 20,000 11,667 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Expenditures 1,896 19,741 41,500 36,834 45,350 45,355 45,360 45,365 45,375 Surplus(Deficit) 73,466 485192 28,650 3,496 (10,000) (105005) (10,010) (10,015) (10,025) M Fund Balance 209,760 257,953 264,867 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 113 United City of Yorkville-Consolidated Budget The table and graph below present the City's funds in aggregate,similar to that of a private business(for illustrative purposes only). All budgeted funds are included except for the following: Park&Recreation Capital portion of(25)Vehicle and Equipment;Library Operations(82);Library Debt Service(83);Library Capital(84);Park&Recreation(79);and Recreation Center(80). FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 7,573,994 10,492,418 9,597,933 9,942,856 9,891,567 9,923,220 10,096,474 10,165,862 10,281,069 Intergovernmental 2,433,424 2,849,064 2,844,797 2,919,363 3,363,800 2,552,260 2,676,700 3,020,660 2,986,220 Licenses&Permits 330,094 342,483 276,450 379,669 261,250 261,250 286,250 286,250 311,250 Fines&Forfeits 213,848 181,392 213,150 175,050 189,050 189,050 189,050 189,050 189,050 Charges for Service 5,517,712 5,510,298 5,094,535 5,332,093 5,556,805 5,550,672 5,604,326 5,635,803 5,674,243 Investment Earnings 9,155 11,966 9,250 21,740 18,475 16,675 15,925 15,775 16,175 Reimbursements 641,369 433,001 211,945 235,470 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Land Cash Contributions 432,354 30,767 20,500 52,106 20,500 23,000 23,000 23,000 23,000 Miscellaneous 85,922 72,008 62,000 191,539 192,777 69,632 70,963 72,329 73,731 Other Financing Sources 743,738 727,380 1,203,585 938,585 2,284,233 5,972,810 1,223,992 3,104,375 2,203,435 Total Revenue 17,981,610 209650,777 19,5349145 20,188,471 21,853,457 24,633,569 20,2619680 22,588,104 21,833,173 Expenditures Salaries 4,105,507 3,560,392 3,965,895 3,878,920 4,121,349 4,121,349 4,121,349 4,121,349 4,121,349 Benefits 2,543,948 2,497,616 2,679,562 2,410,399 2,483,992 2,633,226 2,794,151 2,916,566 3,044,822 Contractual Services 4,226,497 5,341,136 4,566,044 4,510,450 6,325,412 4,736,293 4,824,581 4,893,003 5,007,430 Supplies 814,305 761,737 980,446 846,579 898,744 922,784 952,549 984,163 1,012,964 Capital Outlay 513,081 457,112 1,838,225 1,019,703 2,886,266 2,457,016 5,761,766 3,176,606 2,006,066 Contingencies 75,000 52,075 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Developer Commitments 306,861 306,861 341,919 191,917 - - - - - Debt Service 3,110,775 3,337,833 3,375,399 3,375,399 3,918,016 3,834,625 3,972,787 3,984,727 3,984,431 Other Financing Uses 1,695,628 1,981,309 1,598,949 1,586,971 3,865,421 2,365,296 2,450,867 4,357,511 3,470,960 Total Expenditures 17,391,602 18,296,071 19,396,439 17,870,338 24,549,200 219120,587 24,928,050 24,4839925 22,698,022 Surplus(Deficit) 590,008 2,354,706 137,706 2,318,133 (2,695,743) 3,512,982 (4,666,370) (1,895,822) (864,850) Ending Fund Balance 5,896,901 8,251,614 6,832,127 109569,747 7,8749004 11,386,985 6,720,615 4,824,793 3,959,944 33.91% 45.10% 35.22% 59.15% 32.07% 53.91% 26.96% 19.71% 17.45% Fund Balance $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 114 Yorkville Parks and Recreation-Consolidated Budget The table and graph below present the Park&Recreation funds in aggregate,similar to that of a private business(for illustrative purposes only). All budgeted Park&Recreation funds are included: Parks&Recreation(79);Recreation Center(80);and the Parks&Recreation Capital portion of Vehicle&Equipment(25). FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Charges for Service 830,766 888,788 830,250 749,525 303,275 242,275 242,275 242,275 242,275 Investment Earnings 400 503 450 700 650 650 650 650 650 Reimbursements 14,829 14,038 51,661 52,265 50,000 - - - - Miscellaneous 198,644 208,662 279,200 216,691 223,000 223,000 223,000 223,000 232,700 Other Financing Sources 951,890 736,710 955,886 955,886 2,322,461 1,110,111 1,192,708 1,217,069 1,229,444 Total Revenue 1,996,529 1,848,701 2,117,447 1,975,067 2,899,386 1,576,036 1,658,633 1,682,994 1,705,069 Expenditures Salaries 912,499 853,663 925,800 840,050 802,469 783,969 785,544 787,198 788,934 Benefits 137,717 132,716 325,689 331,945 332,398 352,014 373,590 387,836 402,936 Contractual Services 510,600 540,570 585,780 637,680 341,530 222,530 196,993 201,678 206,598 Supplies 287,298 283,625 373,131 357,156 307,889 293,358 295,186 297,141 299,233 Capital Outlay 24,658 - 50,000 12,000 17,000 16,000 - - - Debt Service - - - - 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 Other Financing Uses - 3,500 2,500 2,500 606,957 - - - - Total Expenditures 1,872,772 1,814,074 2,262,900 2,181,331 2,410,743 1,670,371 1,653,812 1,676,353 1,700,202 Surplus(Deficit) 123,757 34,627 (145,453) (206,264) 488,643 (94,335) 4,821 6,641 4,867 Ending Fund Balance 879914 122,537 (159,341) (83,727) 404,917 310,582 315,402 322,043 326,911 4.69% 6.75% -7.04% -3.84% 16.80% 18.59% 19.07% 19.21% 19.23% $600 Fund Balance m $400 $200 $0 ($200) 115 Yorkville Public Library-Consolidated Budget The table and graph below present the Library's funds in aggregate,similar to that of a private business(for illustrative purposes only). All budgeted Library funds are included: Library Operations(82);Library Debt Service(83);and Library Capital(84). FY 2013 FY 2011 FY 2012 Adopted FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Revenue Taxes 1,252,191 1,411,315 1,502,988 1,483,545 1,442,178 1,416,188 1,434,313 1,436,838 1,469,063 Intergovernmental 24,410 22,212 22,200 23,852 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 22,200 Licenses&Permits 17,650 22,350 16,250 30,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Fines&Forfeits 14,161 12,864 13,000 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 Charges for Service 17,117 15,368 17,000 13,450 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 Investment Earnings 690 604 550 1,470 1,520 1,520 1,720 1,720 1,720 Reimbursements - - 7,306 9,396 - - - - - Miscellaneous 7,823 15,045 8,500 8,940 9,250 9,250 9,250 9,250 9,250 Other Financing Sources - 665,019 43,489 35,469 52,174 32,375 34,168 36,068 38,082 Total Revenue 1,334,042 2,164,777 1,6319283 1,615,423 1,5709622 19524,833 1,544,951 19549,376 1,583,615 Expenditures Salaries 501,353 432,008 440,000 440,000 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 Benefits 143,220 149,612 218,553 200,412 190,977 202,485 215,076 224,105 233,675 Contractual Services 149,678 88,124 111,599 111,649 112,549 113,179 113,841 114,535 115,264 Supplies 180,831 21,623 35,224 37,224 56,600 37,770 37,770 37,770 37,770 Contingencies 6,705 158 1,000 - - - - - - Debt Service 605,925 720,800 795,488 795,488 771,763 716,188 734,313 736,838 744,063 Capital Outlay - 10,965 - - - - - - - Other Financing Uses - 665,019 1,511 5,469 - - - - - Total Expenditures 1,587,712 2,088,309 1,603,375 1,590,242 19579,429 1,517,162 1,548,539 1,560,788 1,578,313 Surplus(Deficit) (253,670) 76,468 27,908 25,181 (8,807) 7,671 (3,589) (11,412) 5,302 Ending Fund Balance 317,336 393,804 370,330 418,985 410,177 417,848 414,259 402,847 408,149 19.99% 18.86% 23.10% 2635% 25.97% 27.54% 26.75% 25.81% 25.86% Fund Balance s $500 $400 o $300 ~ $200 $100 $0 116 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected CITY Cash Flow-Surplus(Deficit) General 221,031 1,542,522 931,242 2,175,101 (705,588) 629,989 501,342 (1,454,104) (559,978) Fox Hill 15,716 (871) (714) (1,680) (3,714) (11,067) (11,067) 3,933 3,933 Sunflower 5,735 265 (2,455) (4,174) (7,454) (18,569) (18,569) 6,431 6,431 C Motor Fuel Tax 234,779 284,457 (119,313) 130,732 (434,456) (152,112) (197,368) (222,769) (48,885) ro m Municipal Bldg 20,700 7,650 5,250 6,000 573,374 c Vehicle&Equip (64,400) (11,568) (147,095) (253,550) (15,937) (22,636) 0 0 (1) e City Wide Capital 19,030 80,544 263,232 292,241 153,479 4,043,647 (4,325,317) (245,245) 1 Debt Service 1,025 78,857 (78,226) (76,824) 925 925 (38,922) (42,860) 129,402 Water 356,361 475,577 (284,604) 78,435 (7,301) (12,641) (29,560) (28,642) (15,012) Sewer (357,382) 625,704 (255,393) (107,560) (229,959) (479,253) (275,452) (291,104) (309,269) Land Cash 216,720 93,847 96,675 379,859 77,500 (333,850) (240,000) 410,000 (40,000) Fox Industrial TIF 146,437 (569,791) - - - - Countryside TIF (299,210) (300,679) (299,543) (303,943) (2,086,613) (121,448) (21,448) (21,448) (21,448) Downtown TIF 73,466 48,192 28,650 3,496 (10,000) (10,005) (10,010) (10,015) (10,025) 590,008 2,354,706 137,706 2,318,133 (2,695,743) 3,512,982 (4,666,370) (1,895,822) (864,850) Cash Flow-Fund Balance General (271,900) 1,270,623 1,596,094 3,445,724 2,740,136 3,370,126 3,871,468 2,417,364 1,857,386 Fox Hill 17,942 17,071 16,719 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) Sunflower 11,922 12,188 10,007 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) C) Motor Fuel Tax 640,399 924,857 465,255 1,055,589 621,133 469,021 271,653 48,885 0 ro Municipal Bldg (587,024) (579,374) (575,774) (573,374) - - - - ao Vehicle&Equip 303,690 292,122 39,578 38,572 22,635 (0) 0 0 (0) d City Wide Capital 652 81,196 332,500 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 a Debt Service 8,653 87,510 8,925 10,686 11,611 12,536 (26,386) (69,246) 60,156 Water 825,261 1,300,837 642,452 1,379,272 1,371,971 1,359,330 1,329,770 1,301,128 1,286,117 Sewer 2,377,831 3,003,537 2,625,761 2,895,977 2,666,019 2,186,765 1,911,313 1,620,209 1,310,940 Land Cash (388,625) (294,778) (172,534) 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) Fox Industrial TIF 569,790 - - - - Countryside TIF 2,178,550 1,877,872 1,578,277 1,573,929 (512,684) (634,131) (655,579) (677,026) (698,474) Downtown TIF 209,760 257,953 264,867 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 5,896,901 8,251,614 6,832,127 10,5699747 7,874,004 11,386,985 6,720,615 4,8249793 3,959,944 117 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Cash Flow-Actual Cash on Hand at FYE PROJECTED General (1,577,285) - 2,239,721 1,781,089 2,190,582 2,516,454 1,571,287 1,207,301 Fox Hill 18,249 17,388 15,391 11,677 610 (10,457) (6,524) (2,591) Sunflower 12,442 12,488 8,014 560 (18,009) (36,578) (30,147) (23,716) 0 Motor Fuel Tax 660,220 899,316 1,020,589 586,133 434,021 236,653 13,885 (35,000) b Municipal Bldg (587,024) - (573,374) - Vehicle&Equip 297,039 291,608 38,572 22,635 (0) 0 0 (0) a City Wide Capital 60,873 167,963 373,437 526,916 4,570,562 245,245 (0) 0 a Debt Service 8,653 87,510 10,686 11,611 12,536 (26,386) (69,246) 60,156 Water 137,277 516,574 551,709 548,788 543,732 531,908 520,451 514,447 Sewer 2,281,063 1,218,819 1,303,190 1,199,708 984,044 860,091 729,094 589,923 Land Cash (641,002) - 85,081 162,581 (171,269) (411,269) (1,269) (41,269) Fox Industrial TIF 569,790 - - - Countryside TIF 2,178,549 1,878,062 1,573,929 (512,684) (634,131) (655,579) (677,026) (698,474) Downtown TIF 209,760 261,109 261,449 251,449 241,444 231,434 221,419 211,394 3,628,604 5,350,836 - 6,908,393 4,590,463 8,154,122 3,481,517 2,271,924 19782,171 62% 65% 65% 58% 72% 52% 47% 45% 118 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Park&Recreation Cash Flow-Sur-plus(Deficit) Vehicle&Equip (15,409) 11,030 (9,000) 28,225 (16,775) (15,775) 225 225 225 Park&Rec 206,408 48,510 (55,320) 12,978 37,950 (78,560) 4,596 6,416 4,642 Rec Ctr (67,242) (24,913) (81,133) (247,467) 467,468 - - - 123,757 34,627 (145,453) (206,264) 488,643 (94,335) 49821 6,641 49867 Cash Flow-Fund Balance Vehicle&Equip 51,443 62,473 22,545 90,698 73,923 58,148 58,373 58,598 58,823 Park&Rec 231,558 280,065 185,635 293,043 330,993 252,433 257,029 263,445 268,088 Rec Ctr (195,087) (220,001) (367,521) (467,468) 0 0 0 0 0 87,914 122,537 (159,341) (83,727) 404,917 310,582 315,402 322,043 326,911 119 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Library Cash Flow-Sur-plus(Deficit) Library Ops (253,670) 71,495 23,221 11,323 9,823 7,471 (3,789) (11,612) 5,102 Library Debt Service (1,821) 1,811 1,821 200 200 200 200 200 Library Capital 6,794 2,876 12,036 (18,830) - - - - (253,670) 76,468 27,908 25,181 (8,807) 7,671 (3,589) (11,412) 5,302 Cash Flow-Fund Balance Library Ops 317,336 388,831 370,330 400,154 409,977 417,448 413,659 402,047 407,149 Library Debt Service - (1,821) - 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 Library Capital - 6,794 18,830 - - - - - 317,336 393,804 370,330 418,985 410,177 417,848 414,259 402,847 408,149 Cash Flow-Actual Cash on Hand at FYE Library Ops 349,841 412,283 Library Debt Service - - Library Capital - 1,375 349,841 413,658 - - - - - - 120 Chart 3 FY 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 City property tax (non-library, estimate) $2,600,000 $2,639,000 $2,691,780 $2,745,616 $2,800,528 $2,856,538 Non-abatement property taxes $2,212,735 $730,000 $590,000 $460,000 $320,000 $250,000 Total $4,812,735 $3,369,000 $3,281,780 $3,205,616 $3,120,528 $3,106,538 Percentage change each year -30.0% -2.6% -2.3% -2.7% -0.4% $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 ■Non-abatement property taxes $2,000,000 ■City property tax(non-library) $1,000,000 $0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 121 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Allocated Items-Aggregated Liability Insurance 325,906 308,490 424,000 317,250 330,000 349,800 370,788 393,035 416,617 Unemployment Ins 77,786 91,200 60,000 45,600 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 54,000 Citv Health Insurance 1,185,928 1,207,844 1,346,185 1,234,033 1,150,430 1,265,473 1,392,020 1,475,542 1,564,074 COBRA Contri 21,675 23,220 12,500 817 - - - - - Retiree Contri 39,671 48,447 60,398 50,994 EE his Contributions 193,147 91,536 84,768 91,345 - - - - - CL Net Ins Costs 931,435 1,044,641 19188,519 1,090,877 1,1509430 192659473 19392,020 19475,542 1,5649074 City Dental Insurance 86,818 87,225 96,667 92,563 95,675 105,243 115,767 122,713 130,076 C Vision Insurance 12,532 10,188 10,377 9,914 10,408 11,449 12,594 13,349 14,150 Library Health Insurance 76,487 86,334 102,877 102,877 90,838 99,922 109,914 116,509 123,499 Lib EE Ins Contributions - - 6,670 8,685 - - - - - Lib Net Ins Costs 769487 86,334 96,207 94,192 90,838 99,922 109,914 116,509 123,499 Property Taxes Corporate 2,185,495 2,282,246 2,288,133 2,276,807 2,288,154 2,311,036 2,334,146 2,357,487 2,381,062 Police Pension 336,075 360,356 413,354 438,711 562,000 587,000 612,000 637,000 662,000 Total City Capped 2,521,570 2,642,602 2,701,487 2,715,518 2,850,154 2,898,036 2,946,146 2,994,487 3,043,062 Non-Abatement of Debt Service - 2,207,080 723,683 720,098 486,146 371,538 290,732 210,022 129,402 Total City 2,521,570 4,849,682 3,425,170 3,435,616 3,336,300 3,269,574 3,2369878 3,204,509 39172,464 -29.2% -2.9% -2.0% -1.0% -1.0% -1.0% Building Permits Revenue 126,829 153,393 140,000 140,000 150,000 1509000 1759000 175,000 200,000 122 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Account Number Description Actual Actual Budget Projected Proposed Projected Projected Projected Projected Allocated Items-A22reeated(cont.) City Salaries Full Time 4,500,413 3,917,584 4,261,000 4,184,250 4,454,018 4,454,018 4,454,018 4,454,018 4,454,018 Overtime 98,513 105,775 122,875 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 Part Time 401,940 373,333 477,820 380,320 310,500 292,000 293,575 295,229 296,965 Total 5,000,866 4,396,692 4,861,695 4,708,370 4,908,318 4,889,818 4,891,393 498939047 4,894,783 Lib Salaries Full Time 501,353 244,695 245,000 245,000 252,540 252,540 252,540 252,540 252,540 Part Time 187,313 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 195,000 Total 501,353 432,008 440,000 440,000 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 447,540 Total Salaries Full Time 5,001,766 4,162,279 4,506,000 4,429,250 4,706,558 4,706,558 4,706,558 4,706,558 4,706,558 Overtime 98,513 105,775 122,875 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 143,800 Part Time 401,940 560,646 672,820 575,320 505,500 487,000 488,575 490,229 491,965 Total 5,502,219 49828,700 59301,695 59148,370 5,3559858 59337,358 5,3389933 5,340,587 5,342,323 Capital Projects-A22reaated Route 47 Expansion Project - 50,108 317,900 202,574 337,766 337,766 337,766 337,766 337,766 MFT - 1219900 76,652 121,900 121,900 121,900 121,900 121,900 Water 25,054 116,000 75,305 129,094 129,094 129,094 129,094 129,094 Sewer 25,054 60,000 38,951 66,773 66,773 66,773 66,773 66,773 Downtown TIF - 20,000 11,667 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Road to Better Roads Program - 100,000 - 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 123