City Council Minutes 2006 03-28-06 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL,
OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE. ]KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,,
HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS,,
800 GAME FARM ROAD ON
TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 2006.
Mayor Prochaska called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M and led the Council in the Pledge of
Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Clerk Milschewski called the roll.
Ward I James Present
Leslie Absent
Ward II Burd Present
Wolfer Present
Ward III Bock Present
Munns Present
Ward IV Besco Present
Spears Present
Also present: City Clerk Milschewski, Interim City Administrator Crois, Assistant City
Administrator Olson, City Attorney Wyeth, Police Chief Martin, Director of Public Works
Dhuse, Director of Park & Recreation Mogel Community Relations Manager Spies and
Community Development Director Miller.
.QUORUM
A quorum was established.
INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS
Mayor Prochaska asked the staff and guests to introduce themselves. He welcomed the guests
and asked them to enter their names on the attendance sheet provided.
AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
Mayor Prochaska asked that the Library Expansion Project Update be moved up on the agenda to
after the public hearings.
COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Public Works Committee 7:00 P.M., Monday, April 3, 2006
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Economic Development Committee 7:00 P.M., Thursday, April 27, 2006
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Administration Committee 7:00 PM, Thursday, April 6, 2006
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Public Safety Committee 7:00 P.M., Thursday, April 13, 2006
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Ad Hoc Technology Committee 6:30 P.M., Tuesday, April 11, 2006
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
Administration Task Force 6:30 P.M., Tuesday, April 18, 2006
City of Yorkville Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Kleinwatcher
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to go into public hearing for the purpose of discussing
Herb and Pam Kleinwatcher and Old Second Bank Trust 8051, petitioners, request to annex to the
United City of Yorkville and rezone from Kendall County A -1 Agricultural to United City of
Yorkville B -3 Service Business District and R -2 One - Family Residence District and for hearing
as to the Annexation Agreement of the petitioner. The real property consists of approximately
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — March 28. 2006 — aagg 2
9.81 acres located on Route 47 south of legion Road and north of Ament Road, Kendall
Township, Kendall County, Illinois. So moved by Alderman Besco; seconded by Alderman
James.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0
Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Mums -aye, Bock -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye
Please see attached Report of Proceedings taken before Christine Vitosh, C.S.R from Depo Court
Reporting Service for the transcription of this portion of the public hearing
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to postpone the public hearing until the April 25, 2006
City Council meeting. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Bock.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays-0
Burd -aye, James -aye, Munns -aye, Bock -aye, Spears -aye Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye
Kendall Creek Development LLC
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to go into public hearing for the purpose of discussing
Kendall Creek Development LLC, petitioners, request to annex to the United City of Yorkville
and rezone from Kendall County A -1 Agricultural to United City of Yorkville R -2 One- Family
Residence District and for hearing as to the Annexation Agreement of the Petitioner. The real
property consists of approximately 141.31 acres located south of Route 126, east of Route 47,
north of Ament Road and west of Ashley Road, Kendall Township, Kendall County, Illinois. So
moved by Alderman Wolfer, seconded by Alderman James.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays-0
Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Munns -aye, Burd -aye, Spears -aye, Bock -aye, Besco -aye
Please see attached Report of Proceedings taken before Christine Vitosh, C.S.R. from Depo Court
Reporting Service for the transcription of this portion of the public hearing.
— , Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to close the public hearing. So moved by Alderman
Spears; seconded by Alderman Burd.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0
Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Munns -aye, Burd -aye, Spears -aye, Bock -aye, Besco -aye
PRESENTATIONS
Library Expansion Project Update
Tom Lindblom and Russ Walter were present and circulated photographs of the installation of the
structural steel needed for the library expansion project. Mr. Lindblom reported that the steel
arrived on site on March 13, 2006 and will be installed in four phases; northwest, northeast,
southeast and southwest. It is hoped that the steel will be up by the end of the week of April 3,
2006. The next steps would be the installation of the second floor decking and the roof. He also
reported that exposed wood beams arrived on March 27, 2006 and they are being protected from
the weather. He noted that there is a partial masonry wall already constructed and he explained
that construction on the wall stopped due to the installation of the steel; the wall needed to be
constructed first because it is a load bearing wall. He stated that everything is moving forward.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Mary Unterbrunner, 418 Jackson Street, expressed her opposition to the parking ban. She stated
that she attended the meetings prior to the vote on the parking ban ordinance and most of the
citizens in attendance were opposed to it. She stated that she does not feel that the city has
proven a need for a blanket ban. She stated that in the meetings, there were distinct areas where a
minority of residents complained about trucks parking on the streets. She felt that addressing the
parking of large trucks on city streets is a separate issue and that the whole city does not need to
be "punished" for this. She stated that she did not feel the parking ban signs should be installed
until the problem is resolved. She asked that the City Council consider the repeal of the ban.
Joe Barry, 502 Teri Lane, expressed his opposition to the parking ban. He stated that he felt the
ban should not be applied to everyone because of a "few bad apples ". He stated that the ban
creates a problem for him when his children are home from college; they have six cars in the
family. He stated it also affects his children's friends when they chose to spend the night at the
last minute. He asked who should be called at 11:00 pm. or midnight for parking permission.
He stated he would rather have the police protecting property rather than having giving citations
for those breaking the parking ban.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — March 28. 2006 — page 3
Anne Engelhardt, 312 E. Blackberry Lane, read a letter to the City Council (see attached)
opposing the parking ban.
Dan Pickert, 709 Teri Lane, addressed the City Council. He explained that he is a seventeen year
resident of the City and never had a complaint until now; he is against the parking ban. He
explained that he has a driveway that can accommodate nine cars however every time he has to
rotate cars in the driveway because the City Council decided that he cannot park on the street, he
will be thinking of them. He asked the City Council to rescind the ordinance.
v Larry King, 900 E. Spring Street, asked the City Council what was the root cause of the problem.
He felt that the cause was commercial vehicles parking on the streets. He stated that to have a
"sweeping" ban is "torturing" the residents of Yorkville. He asked the City Council to address
the real parking problem and he suggested that residents should have the opportunity to vote on
the ban.
Rich Johnson, Teri Lane, asked why a parking ban was needed between 1:00 and 6:00 a.m. He
stated that the city does not have street sweepers going down the streets at that time and that there
are more cars parked on the streets during the day. He stated that he has seen cars parked
between the curb and the sidewalk in order to get off the street and that while he was not
personally affected by the ban but felt it should examined because it is causing a hardship for a lot
of people.
Roger Murphy, 803 Teri Lane, stated that during the parking ban discussion of the last several
weeks, he noticed that many people have made comments and that most of the comments are in
opposition of the ban. He stated that even though City Council members claim that people are
calling them supporting the ban, he has not talked to anyone or seen anyone at the last few
meetings who supports it. Alderman Munns stated that residents from Fox Hill attended early
meetings regarding the ban and expressed their support. Mr. Murphy stated that maybe Fox Hill
has a problem but the entire city doesn't. He suggested that the residents of Yorkville should be
allowed to vote on the issue rather than just a few residents on the City Council.
Mayor Prochaska and Alderman Spears stated that the Public Safety Committee was revisiting
the ordinance at the April 13, 2006 meeting and Alderman Spears invited the residents to attend.
She stated that she received numerous calls from residents both positive and negative however
she was not in attendance when the discussions were happening due to having surgery. She
stated that the Public Safety Committee is trying to get statistics and information from other
communities with similar ordinances to review.
Alderman Burd suggested that the parking ban be brought back to the Committee of the Whole
meeting instead of the Public Safety Committee. She stated that at the last Committee of the
Whole meeting where the ban was discussed, she made suggestions and was told that these things
were already discussed in detail at the Public Safety Committee. She stated that she did not feel
that she became part of the discussion and that this is a big issue and that all the aldermen should
be involved in the discussion. She stated that she felt for awhile the ban did not affect many
people in her ward however she has received calls from residents on the north side of the river
regarding it.
Mayor Prochaska stated that he did not have a problem with this going back to a Committee of
the Whole meeting and he reminded the aldermen that they can attend any of the committee
meetings. It was the consensus of the City Council to bring this discussion back to the
Committee of the Whole meeting. He further noted that the night the ordinance was approved he
asked the Public Safety Committee to make a recommendation for those who would suffer a
hardship due to the ban. He suggested that the Police Department not issue any tickets until the
matter is resolved and he asked that anyone experiencing a hardship due to the ordinance should
send Chief Martin a note regarding their circumstance.
Alderman Munns asked if the police would not be enforcing the ordinance and if this could
happen with any ordinance the City Council passes that people don't like. He asked if this
needed to be voted on by the City Council. Attorney Wyeth stated that there are times when the
City Council and staff can use good discretion to enforce the ordinance in certain circumstances.
Official action is needed to change any ordinance. Chief Martin stated that the Police Department
is issuing warnings and that no citations have been issued. The Police Department will continue
this until they receive a clear understanding from the City Council, Alderman Bock noted that
Chief Martin and his officers have the discretion to enforce any law. He gave the example of a
person violating a speeding law, the officer can pull over the offender and just issue a warning
instead of a ticket. The law is still in affect however it is the officer's discretion how to enforce
it. The parking ban is in affect however it will not be enforced to the full extent of the law.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — March 28. 2006 — page 4
Loree King, 900 E. King, asked what constituted a hardship. Mayor Prochaska asked her to tell
Chief Martin why she feels she needs to park a car in the street. She also asked for clarification
on what days visitors are allowed to park on the street. Chief Martin stated that at a previous
meeting, he misspoke about the days visitors are allowed. He stated that the initial intent of the
ordinance was to only allow visors on specific days however visitors are allowed any time during
the week.
Anne Engelhardt stated that there are two things she would like to know; the history of the
ordinance and the basis of the actual ordinance. She stated that she hoped this information would
be given to all the aldermen before this issue is rehashed.
Dale Larson stated that he was present the night the ordinance was passed and that he found it
fimny to hear how this ordinance was "years in the making" yet that all these complaints have
slipped through the cracks. He stated that it doesn't say much for the Council that all the issues
have not been worked out. Mayor Prochaska noted that this ordinance has been discussed for
years however the City Council changes and it is not the same group of people looking at it each
time. Mr. Larson asked if the Council members cared about the ramifications to those the
ordinance affected.
Alderman Burd noted that she has been on the City Council for eight years however she is not a
member of the Public Safely Committee which is the committee who discussed the ordinance
many times. She stated that when this came forward, there was an even amount of people for and
against the ban. She stated that there were several aldermen who supported the ban because if
affected residents in their area. She commented that there were not a lot of people in her ward
who were upset about it. Because of this, she did not really get involved in the ordinance but now
that more people are contacting her she is willing to throw her opinion in to the discussion.
Mr. Larson noted that the Mayor stated the night the ordinance was passed that some residents
were being put into the position to automatically breaking the law. He stated that he breaks the
law because he has to park across the sidewalk in order to get off the street. Alderman Burd
stated that the Mayor has been here a long time and he never said anything like that until that
night. She stated that his comment was a "big surprise "; Alderman Burd noted that Mayor
Prochaska participated in the discussions regarding the ban and that this was the first time he
"tossed that one out" at the City Council. Mr. Larson stated that the City Council did not care
about residents adversely affected by the ordinance.
Mary Unterbrunner asked what the process was to get an ordinance repealed. Mayor Prochaska
stated that she should talk with the aldermen because they vote on the repeal of the ordinance.
Mrs. Unterbrunner asked the City Council to consider repealing it.
Alderman Wolfer stated that he took issue with Mr. Larson's implication that the City Council
does not care. He assured Mr. Larson that they do care; this issue will be examin again. He
stated that sometimes an ordinance is passed and it needs a closer look because not everything is
seen at first.
Joe Barry noted that the United City of Yorkville is exploding at the seams. He stated that
developers come in and note the amount of open space that is in their developments. He
suggested that some of this open space should be placed between the curbs and sidewalks. He
asked the City Council to plan better for the future.
Joe Gillespie, 1218 Willow Way, commented that after listening to the citizen's comments for the
last 30 minutes, the City Council deserves every penny that is proposed in their raise later in the
meeting and he asked that the City Council vote for the raise for future City Council members.
He also asked the citizens to stay involve even after the parking ban goes away.
CONSENT AGENDA
- Alderman Besco asked that Item #16 - Ordinance Amending City Code Title 1 — Administration,
Chapter 6 — Municipal Officers and Employees Regarding Appointment of Officers and City
Departments be pulled off the Consent Agenda and placed under the Administration Committee
Report.
1. Monthly Treasurer's Report for January 2006 (ADM 2006-21)
2. Resolution 2006 -21— Appointing IMRF Authorized Agent - authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute (ADM 2006 -22)
3. Maintenance Proposal for Fire Alarm System at City Hall/Police Station — award to
Thomas Alarm Systems in an amount not to exceed $690.00 and authorize Mayor to
execute (PS 2006 -05)
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council - March 28, 2006 - nage 5
4. Water Department Reports for January 2006 (PW 2006 -42)
5. Bruell Street Pump Station - Change Order #3 - authorize reduction in an amount not to
exceed $38,879. 00 and City Engineer to execute (PW 2006 -43)
6. Contract A.2a. (Cannonball Booster Station) and Contract C.5 (South PRV Station) -
Change Order 43 - authorize reduction in an amount not to exceed $13, 800.00 Mayor to
execute (PW 2006 -44)
7. Grande Reserve (Route 34 Improvements) - Bond Reduction #1 - authorize reduction in
an amount not to exceed $426,287.33 (PW 2006 -48)
8. Southwest Interceptor (Contract 1)- Change Order #1 - authorize reduction in an amount
not to exceed $11,940.00 and Mayor to execute (PW 2006 -49)
9. KyIyn's Ridge Unit 1- Earthwork Letter of Credit Reduction #2 - authorize reduction to
Old Second Bank Letter of Credit No. 15317 in an amount not to exceed $33,4 79.96 (PW
2006 -53)
10. Kylyn's Ridge Unit 2 - Earthwork Letter of Credit Reduction #2 - authorize reduction to
Old Second Bank Letter of Credit No. 15470 in an amount not to exceed $7, 020.50 (PW
2006 -54)
11. Raymond Regional Storm Sewer - Suen Easement - authorize the Mayor and City Clerk
to execute (PW 2006 -55)
12. Resolution 2006 -22 - Countryside Parkway (East Kendall to Center Parkway) MFT
Resolution - authorize City Clerk to execute (PW 2006 -45)
13. IDOT Joint Agreement - Route 126 Relocation at Route 71 - authorize the Mayor and
City Clerk to execute (PW 2006 -47)
a. Resolution 2006 -23 - For Improvement by municipality - authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute
b. Ordinance 2006 -21- For the addition to the city street system, a portion of
former Illinois 126, to serve as a frontage road to newly realigned Route 126
located in the northeast quadrant of the relocated Illinois 71 and 126 intersection
- authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
c. Ordinance 2006 -22 - For appropriation of funds for roadway lighting and utility
casing at Illinois 127 and 71 intersection - authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute
d. Ordinance 2006 -23- Regulating parking in the vicinity of Illinois 71 and 126
intersection - authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
e. Ordinance 2006 -24 - Regulating encroachment at public right of way -
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
14. Resolution 2006 -24 - Establishing Water Meter Fees - authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute (PW 2006 -50)
15. Resolution 2006 -25 - Approving agreement with Sente- Rubel- Bosman -Lee Architects,
Ltd. for conceptual design services for Park Maintenance and Administration Facility -
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute (PW 2006 -40)
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. So moved
by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Spears.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays-0
Burd -aye, James -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye, Bock -aye, Besco -aye
PLANNING COMMISSION /ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL
No report.
MINUTES FOR APPROVAL
A motion was made by Alderman James to approve the minutes of the City Council meeting of
February 28, 2006 and the Committee of the Whole meeting of February 7, 2006; seconded by
Alderman Besco.
City Clerk Milschewski noted that the times noted on page 11 of the minutes are incorrect and
have been corrected in the final copy.
Motion approved b a viva voce vote.
PP Y
BILLS FOR APPROVAL
A motion was made by Alderman James to approve the paying of the bills listed on the Detailed
Board Report dated March 17, 2006 totaling the following amounts: checks in the amount of
$1,284,035.11 (vendors); $171,920.37 (payroll period ending 3/4/06); for a total of
$1,455,955.48; seconded by Alderman Besco.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0
Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Mums -aye, Bock -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — March 28, 2006 — page 6
REPORTS
MAYOR'S REPORT
Coffee with the Mayor
Mayor Prochaska reported that the next Coffee with the Mayor would be held on April 1. 2006 at
State Street Mortgage, 691 N. Bridge Street from 9:00 to 11:00 a.m.
Ordinance 2006 -25 Establishing Special Service Area Number 2005 -108
Autumn Creek
(ADM 2005 -20a)
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve an ordinance establishing Special Service Area
Number 2005 -108 (Autumn Creek), as presented, subject to legal review. So moved by
Alderman Wolfer; seconded by Alderman James.
Mayor Prochaska stated that this was discussed at the Committee of the Whole meeting and
everything is in order. The developer has had discussions with the School District.
Alderman Burd asked if this SSA was included in the Annexation Agreement and Mayor
Prochaska stated it was and that there is one more similar SSA to come before the City Council.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -6 Nays -1
Burd -aye, Spears -nay, Munns -aye, Besco -aye, Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Bock -aye
Ordinance 2006 -26 Providing for Issuance of Special Service Area 2005 -108
Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006
Autumn Creek
(ADM 2005 -20b)
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve an ordinance providing for issuance of Special
Service Area 2005 -108 Special Tax Bonds, Series 2006 (Autumn Creek), as presented, subject to
staff and legal review. So moved by Alderman Wolfer, seconded by Alderman Burd.
Alderman Burd commented that she appreciated that the developer had everything in place with
the School District.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -6 Nays -1
Spears -nay, Munns -aye, Besco -aye, Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Bock -aye, Burd -aye
Ordinance 2006 -27 Setting a Date for a Public Hearing on the Proposed Downtown
Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area
and to Approve a Public Notice for the Hearing
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve an ordinance to set a date for a public hearing
on the Proposed Downtown Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project Area and to
approve a Public Notice for the Hearing, as presented subject to legal review. So moved by
Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Wolfer.
Mayor Prochaska reminded the City Council that the hearing date is May 23, 2006.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -6 Nays -0 Abstain -1
Munns -aye, Besco -aye, Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Bock -aye, Burd - abstain, Spears -aye
Resolution 2006 -26 Approving an Agreement with Schoppe Design Associates, Inc.
For Professional Services for Grande Reserve Park D
(PKBD 2006 -02)
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve a resolution approving an agreement with
Schoppe Design Associates, Inc. for professional services for Grande Reserve Park D, as
presented subject to legal review. So moved by Alderman James; seconded by Alderman Wolfer.
Alderman Munns asked Community Development Director Miller if this was a project that came
in before he was lured. Director Miller stated that the deadline for this project is July 1, 2006 and
it is not feasible for him to get this done in time. He stated that this has been discussed with the
Park Board and it is more reasonable to have Schoppe Design do the design.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays-0
Besco -aye, Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Bock -aye, Burd -aye, Spears -aye, Munns -aye
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — March 28. 2006 — aage 7
Health Insurance/Benefit Renewal
(ADM 2006 -21)
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to renew the annual contract for insurance coverage for
city employees with Blue Cross/Blue Shield (Medical), MetLife (Dental and Life) without change
to the current employee premium requirements. So moved by Alderman Bock; seconded by
Alderman James.
Alderman Munns stated that it had been discussed in the goal meeting to have the employees
share in the insuran premium. He noted that city employees only pay $1.00 /month for their
benefits. He stated that he has recommended that the employees should share in this cost
especially since the city pays $750,000.00 /year on health care. He stated that the city is getting
too big to continue to pay this out; it cannot afford to fund free insurance. He stated he could not
support this; no one gets free insurance.
Mayor Prochaska stated that this is a matter of timing however there will be further discussion on
the employees sharing the cost. Mayor Prochaska noted that the employees need to know what is
happening at this time. He also noted that the city's premiums have decreased $36,000.00
because no one is abusing their insurance.
Alderman Spears stated that information was received from the City Attorney and Labor Attorney
that the information received from Caywood and Associates is incorrect; the city can readdress
this issue at anytime.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -5 Nays -1 Abstain -1
Spears -aye, Munns -nay, Besco - abstain, Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Bock -aye, Burd -aye
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
Resolution 2006 -27 Adopting Sponsorship Policy
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve an amendment to the Sponsorship Policy as
presented and to approve the three pending sponsorships before the City Council. So moved by
Alderman Wolfer; seconded by Alderman Bock
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0
Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Bock -aye, Burd -aye, Spears -aye, Muuns -aye, Besco -aye
ATTORNEY'S REPORT
No report.
CITY CLERK'S REPORT
No report.
CITY TREASURER'S REPORT
No report.
CITY ADMINISTATOR'S REPORT
Administrator Crois reminded everyone that the Public Hearing for the 2006 /2007 Budget is
scheduled for April 11, 2006 and that a copy of the proposed budget will be available for viewing
on March 31, 2006.
FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No report.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
Director Dhuse reported that the State Street watermam project is underway. The watermain is
being replaced from the comer of Fox Road and State Street all the way to the industrial park.
( This will upgrade water pressure and water quality.
CHIEF OF POLICE REPORT
No report.
DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION REPORT
Special Needs Programs
Director Mogle reported that he is in the process of doing research in dete the number of
residents who would benefit from special recreational services; those designed for disabled
individuals. He stated he would be bringing his findings to the Park Board and the City Council.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — March 28. 2006 — page 8
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT
Designer Interviews
Director Miller reported that interviews for a Parks Designer will begin this Friday, March 31,
2006. He hopes that the position will be filled by the end of April 2006. The deadline for
applications for the Urban Designer is the end of April and he hoped this would be filled in May
2006.
- Sign Ordinance
Director Miller reported that he is currently working on redrafting the City's Sign Ordinance. He
is preparing a survey for the City Council to fill out to help him craft the new ordinance.
COMMUNITY & LIAISON REPORT
Senior Service Providers
Alderman Spears reported that she attended the Senior Service Providers. Items discussed were:
• The lack of senior and affordable housing in the Yorkville area.
• The Kendall County Elder Friendly Community Summit — to be held on April 4, 2006
from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Trinity United Methodist Church.
• Senior victims of hurricane Katrina and disaster plans
• Kendall County Women's Health Fair — held at Cross Lutheran Church on April 1, 2006
from 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. This is jointly sponsored by the Kendall County Health
Department and several area hospitals.
• Care Giver Support Group — they will meet on the second and fourth Wednesdays on the
month from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. at the Kendall County Health Department.
Voluntary Action Center
Alderman Spears reported she attended a field trip organized by Jeff Wilkins, the Kendall County
Administrator to the Voluntary Action Center (VAC) in DeKalb, Illinois. Representatives from
other communities also attended. VAC is a non - for -profit group incorporated in 1974 that
provides nutritious home delivered meals to people in DeKalb and LaSalle Counties. VAC'S
transportation service was discussed at the meeting (transportation budget, fares for
transportation, vehicles in fleet, hours of operation, number oftrips made, grants, etc.).
Northeastern Illinois Agency on Aging
Alderman Spears reported that she attended the Northeastern Illinois Agency on Aging Advisory
Council meeting where Medicare Part D plan, housing, transportation, social service agency bills
and Presidents Bush's 2007 federal budget were discussed.
Alderman Besco thanked Alderman Spears for the time she dedicates to seniors.
Aurora Area Convention and Visitor Bureau
Alderman Burd reported that she attended the Aurora Area Convention and Visitor Bureau
meeting where the Mayor of Aurora's budget cut of $20,000.00 was discussed. The Mayor of
Aurora has indicated that budget cuts to the group may be an ongoing thing so the AACVB is
trying to convince the mayor that this is a great program to fund. Alderman Burd noted that the
group recently won a state award for their campaign even after being in competition with the City
of Chicago.
Prairie Parkway Construction Planning
Mayor Prochaska reported that he attended a meeting for the Prairie Parkway Construction
Planning and there is a meeting for elected officials to discuss the progress of the Prairie Parkway
scheduled for Monday, April 3, 2006 at Plano High School. The following day, April 4, 2006
there will be an open meeting at Yorkville High School at 5:30 p.m. to update the public. Mayor
Prochaska noted that environmental and design issues have been the topics of discussion.
Route 47 Improvements
Mayor Prochaska reported that he, Director Miller and Administrator Crois met with Kendall
County representatives and Mike Schoppe to look at proposals for the removal of the wall and the
hill alongside the old courthouse in anticipation of the Route 47 widening. He hoped that he
would have something to show the City Council in the next three to four weeks. Director Miller
indicated that there was also a meeting scheduled with IDOT to discuss the hill.
Glen Palmer Dam
Alderman Burd reported that she received a letter from the Army Corps of Engineers saying that
they have issued the permit for the improvements to the Glen Palmer Dam.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — March 28, 2006 — ua eg_9
COMMITTEE REPORTS
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT
Heartland Circle — Acceptance of Storm Sewer and Sanitary
(PW 2006 -52)
A motion was made by Alderman Besco to approve the acceptance of storm sewer and sanitary
sewer improvements for Heartland Circle Subdivision and to reduce the letter of credit
accordingly as presented in the memo of the City Engineer dated March 1, 2006; seconded by
Alderman Munns.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0
Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Bock -aye, Burd -aye, Spears -aye, Munns -aye, Besco -aye
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
No report.
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT
Amending Ordinance 2005 -95 Amending City Code Title 6 —
Traffic, Regarding Overnight Parking and
Restrictions on Parking of Commercial Vehicles
(PS 2006 -07)
No motion was made; ordinance to be discussed at the April 4, 2006 Committee of the Whole
meeting.
Ordinance 2006 -28 Amending City Code, Title 3 Business; Chapter 3
Liquor Control Regarding New Classification (Gift Basket Sales)
(PS 2005 -09)
A motion was made by Alderman Spears to approve an Ordinance amending City Code, Title 3
Business; Chapter 3 Liquor Control Regarding New Classification for Gift Basket Sales, as
' presented, subject to legal review; seconded by Alderman Wolfer.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays-0
Bock -aye, Burd -aye, Spears -aye, Munns -aye, Besco -aye, Wolfer -aye, James -aye
ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Ordinance 2006 -29 Amending City Code Title 1— Administration, Chapter 6 —
Municipal Officers and Employees Regarding Section 1 -6 -5, Salaries
(ADM 2005 -14)
A motion was made by Alderman James to approve an Ordinance amending City Code Title 1 —
Administration, Chapter 6 — Municipal Officers and Employees Regarding Section 1 -6 -5,
Salaries, as presented subject to legal review; seconded by Alderman Spears.
Alderman Wolfer clarified that this was for the raise for the elected officials; Mayor Prochaska
stated it was.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -5 Nays -2
Burd -aye, Spears -aye, Munns -aye, Besco -aye, Wolfer -nay, James -nay, Bock -aye
Salary Increases for the Neat Fiscal Year (Cola/Merit)
(ADM 2006 -24)
A motion was made by Alderman James to approve the salary increases for the next Fiscal Year
(2 % COLA and .5% Merit) subject to the approval of the 2006 /2007 Budget; seconded by
Alderman Wolfer.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -6 Nays -1
Munns -aye, Besco -nay, Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Bock -aye, Burd -aye, Spears -aye
Ordinance 2006 -30 Amending City Code Title 1— Administration, Chapter 6 —
Municipal Officers and Employees Regarding Appointment of Officers
and City Departments
ADM 2006 -25)
A motion was made by Alderman James to approve an ordinance amending City Code Title 1—
Administration, Chapter 6 — Municipal Officers and Employees regarding the appointment of
Officers and City Departments and authori the Mayor and City Clerk to execute; seconded by
Alderman Besco.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — March 28, 2006 — pa 10
Alderman Besco asked if the Assistant City Administrator was included in the ordinance and
Mayor Prochaska clarified that the position is not appointed but rather a hired position.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -0
Besco -aye, Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Bock -aye, Burd -aye, Spears -aye, Munns -aye
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
Senior Citizen Tax Exemption Information
Alderman Burd requested that the City make available a copy of how senior citizens can qualify
for real estate tax exemptions. Mayor Prochaska stated that the information could be made
available at the City Hall front desk.
Park Policy for Special Recreation Services
Alderman Burd asked that the City Council revisit the Park policy for the non - resident portion of
the special recreational services. She asked that it be placed on the Committee of the Whole
(COW) agenda to further discuss funding. Alderman Wolfer noted that Director Mogle is doing
research on this and he asked that the City Council have that information before this is discussed
further. Alderman Burd stated that his research is for next year and she wants to review the
policy because something is needed to handle the problem this year as well as long range
planning. Alderman Wolfer further noted that the Park Board is addressing this year's problem
so he asked that they be invited to attend so they can advise the City Council as to what they are
working on. Alderman Besco asked if the information regarding special needs could be obtained
from the School District. Director Mogle stated he was in contact with the School District. There
was some discussion regarding the line item for this in the budget and individuals needing the
service. Alderman Wolfer stated that the Park Board discussed going to churches and other
organizations for donations so that all the children needing special services can be covered.
Alderman Burd disagreed with this and stated that the Park Board said they were not willing to
change or addressed the problem. Alderman Spears asked if Director Mogle was checking with
social services in Kendall County for his research and he stated he was. Alderman Burd asked if
Director Mogle would have his information by the COW meeting. Director Mogle stated that
there are two issues; one is about an individual who was sponsored by the Park Board and the
other concerns the need in the community for the city to become a member. He stated that he
hoped to have information on the first issue by next Tuesday and he would try to have the
remaining information for the COW meeting.
Fox Hill Traffic Light
Alderman Munns questioned how getting the traffic light at Route 34 and Sycamore Street was
progressing. Director Dhuse stated that he spoke with City Engineer Wywrot and a warrant study
will be done. He stated he would ask Mr. Wywrot how long it would take for the study and he
explained that someone will have to sit at the intersection and do a visual count.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to adjourn. So moved by Alderman Besco; seconded by
Alderman Wolfer.
Motion approved by a viva voce vote.
Meeting adjourned at 9:03 P.M.
Minutes submitted by:
Jacquelyn Milschewski,
City Clerk City of Yorkville, Illinois
+CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 28, 2006
PLEASE PRINT
NAME: ADDRESS
i o
o 61�
Q &ln v g03 Tyr �n
/ //\ � 1 / / / r ////���1 /A, ♦ _ �' \ / /` �- P
W Y Y I Y Y , V \ / LA / • l v ` 1 1J V
y
L� 9 sl
a
SIG
I
1 �
+CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 28, 2006
PLEASE PRINT
NAME: ADDRESS:
q ate L
Ca,vtur � 0V.
o�4P 01 � ,rn5 Soi reri La r)
0
(-C 6 kvrnS 5c) l ref;�i' L.jan e
A6 U-) , d2a 3 Ct)boCL c e Cr*h
(ac
CCy
ti
SIGNN -'
+CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 28, 2006
PLEASE PRINT
NAME: ADDRESS:
p .5s
I
SIGNIN
I
I
312 East Blackberry Lane
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
March 27, 2006
Mayor Art Prochaska
Yorkville City Council
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, Illinosi 60560
Dear Mayor Prochaska and Council Members Leslie, James, Burd, Wolfer, Munns, Bock,
Spears, Crois, and Besco:
Last summer we opposed the proposed parking ban and expressed our concerns in a letter
that was sent to you on July 22, 2005. We also attended meetings regarding the proposed
parking ban and presented our opinions. At that time, we had five vehicles that were
regularly used by our family. After the parking ban was approved, we sold our van, our
extra vehicle used for hauling. We only have enough space for four vehicles (two in the
garage and two in the driveway). When our college -aged boys are home, we now have to
park vehicles in the driveway and move them around when family members go to work
the following morning. (Residents in our cul -de -sac have not signed a request for a
waiver at this time.)
We support parking restrictions for any safety issues at any time of the day or night. If
parked vehicles make safe passage more difficult, they should be ticketed for obstruction
of traffic. All vehicles should be off of the road any time there is snow or ice on the
roads. We further support any parking ban on designated days that the streets are being
cleaned.
Since the ban has become a law, we see tlatthat it continues to be a major issue to many
residents. We have heard numerous complaints regarding the new law from Yorkville
residents. Since this hot topic will only heat up in the summer when college students
come home and when more social gatherings take place, we are compelled to express our
., opinions and suggestions to solve this problem.
If the original issue was that large vehicles parked on the street, we still don't understand
why this law deals with all vehicles in the community. According to the information in
the March 23, 2006, Kendall County Record, the original concern was based on large
trucks parked on city streets overnight. If this is a safety concern, then a law for vehicles
over a certain weight or size should be written targeting this concern. In the same
Kendall County Record, a police officer was quoted as stating the overnight ban was
proposed in response to burglaries on streets. Vehicles parked outside- on the street or in
a driveway- will still be prey to vandals.
Regarding residential burglaries, we have found the following statistics from State Farm
Insurance. Over 60% of residential burglaries occur during the day and 63% of non-
residential burglaries occur at night. The Federal Bureau of Investigation paper titled
"Crime in the United States 2004" indicated that 62.2% of residential burglaries
i
happened between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., and 58% of businesses were targeted for evening
robberies.
Still another concern seems to how streets look. An alderman stated that he had people
saying that the streets have never looked better. We question that statement since we
have seen cars parked on the grass parkway and between the road and sidewalk. One
vehicle we noticed was parked in the grass right in front of a house. We feel that the
street is more appropriate than off the street in yards.
We believe that if the law is to continue to be enforced, the following method (we
suggested this as an option last summer) would be a viable solution to all of the citizens
of Yorkville. People who feel that they have a justifiable reason for parking overnight on
the street could apply for a special permit. The resident would need to fill out the
information on the request for a permit and explain why they need the street parking. If
the police accept the request, a sticker could be placed on the vehicle for easy
identification. If necessary, a small fee could be assessed to pay for the paperwork and j
stickers. The people using the car window sticker would have to follow all city parking
laws regarding safety, snow, and street cleaning. This information regarding special
permits could routinely be printed in the city newsletter along with other street reminders,
such as leaf pick up, brush pick up, garbage days, and mailbox courtesy for postal
workers.
The permit proposal places the responsibility on the owner of the vehicle to justify his /her
needs. The city will have the final authority to allow the permit or to deny it based on
safety or hardship issues rather than if all of the neighbors agree to sign a petition. The
sticker would easily identify vehicles for the police and it would allow the police to warn
or ticket illegal cars. People with overnight guests could still get the permits in advance
for special occasions, or they could call the police to register vehicles for one night if
unexpected guests arrive.
We believe this solution would be the best option if the parking ban continues to be a law
in the city of Yorkville. It is our hope that this issue can be solved logically and
efficiently, so that the Council and the community can move forward in addressing the
major issues that are shaping the future of Yorkville.
Sincerely,
Jerry and Anne Engelhardt
630 -553 -5073
i
i
I
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS
REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had at the meeting
of the above - entitled matter taken before
CHRISTINE M. VITOSH, C.S.R., on March 28, 2006,
at the hour of 7:00 p.m., at 800 Game Farm Road
in the City of Yorkville, Illinois.
i
I
i
i
I
J
REPO • COURT
reporting service
800 West Fifth Avenue • Suite 203C • Naperville, IL 60563 • 630 - 983 -0030 • Fax 6 983 -6013
www.depocourt.com
i
2
1 P R E S E N T:
2 MR. ARTHUR F. PROCHASKA, Mayor; q
3 MR. PAUL JAMES, Alderman; q
4 MR. JASON LESLIE, Alderman;
5 MS. VALERIE BURD, Alderman;
6 MR. DEAN WOLFER, Alderman;
7 MR. MARTY MUNNS, Alderman;
8 MR. JAMES BOCK, Alderman;
9 MR. JOSEPH BESCO, Alderman;
10 MS. ROSE ANN SPEARS, Alderwoman;
11 MR. JOHN CROIS, City Administrator;
1
a
12 MS. JACQUELYN MILSCHEWSKI, City Clerk.
13
1
14 A P P E A R A N C E S:
15 WYETH, HEITZ & BROMBEREK
300 East Fifth Avenue, Suite 380
16 Naperville, Illinois 60563
BY: MR. JOHN JUSTIN WYETH,
17 appeared on behalf of the United
City of Yorkville, Illinois.
18
� I
19 - - - - - j
20
21
22
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
3
1 (Pledge of Allegiance)
2 MAYOR PROCHASKA: I would entertain
3 a motion to go into public hearing for the
4 purpose of discussing the petition and request
5 for annexation of Herb and Pam Kleinwachter and
I
6 Old Second National Bank, Trust 8051, request to
I
7 annex to United City of Yorkville and rezone from
8 Kendall County A -1 Agricultural to United City of
i
9 Yorkville B -3 Service Business District and R -2
10 One- Family Residence District, and for hearing as
11 to the annexation agreement of petitioner.
12 The real property consists of
I
13 approximately 9.81 acres located on Route 47
14 south of Legion Road and north of Ament Road,
15 Kendall Township, Kendall County, Illinois.
16 MR. BESCO: So moved.
17 MR. JAMES: Second.
18 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Moved and
19 seconded. May I have roll call, please?
20 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Besco.
21 MR. BESCO: Aye.
22 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Burd.
23 MS. BURD: Aye.
24 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: James.
I
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
4
1 MR. JAMES: Aye.
2 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Munns.
I
3 MR. MUNNS: Aye.
4 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Bock.
5 MR. BOCK: Aye.
6 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Spears.
7 MS. SPEARS: Aye.
8 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Wolfer.
i
9 MR. WOLFER: Aye.
i
10 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Okay. We are in
I
11 public hearing. The first thing that I need to
12 say is the posting of this public hearing in the
13 paper had the incorrect date, it had tomorrow as
i
14 the public hearing date, so I believe what we do,
I
15 we probably still need to postpone this to
16 another -- j
17 WHEREUPON:
18 DANIEL J. KRAMER,
19 testified before the Yorkville City Council as
20 follows:
21 MR. KRAMER: I would suggest we --
22 and I talked with Attorney Wyeth this
23 afternoon -- that we open the hearing,
24 then adjourn it to a date certain, but if there
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
i
5
1 are any people here tonight --
2 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Right, that's why
3 we opened it.
4 If there is anyone here -- I
5 guess I should ask that question before we go
6 through the whole thing.
7 Is there anyone here that is
8 here to give testimony for this particular public
i
9 hearing?
10 (No Response)
1
11 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Then what I would
12 like to do is entertain a motion to postpone this
13 public hearing to the date of April 25th.
I
14 Is that enough time to get the
i
15 notice out again?
i
16 MR. WYETH: Yes, sir, it is.
17 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Okay. To the date
18 of April 25th, 2006, here at the City Council
19 chambers.
20 MR. KRAMER: And, again, we served
21 the correct dates on the individual owners, it
22 was just somewhere between the transcription and
23 the date --
24 MAYOR PROCHASKA: And the posting.
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
6
1 MR. KRAMER: Right, and the posting
2 was fine, too, so all that will go is the
3 certificate of publication. The services are all
4 good and they will continue to the 25th.
i
5 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Okay. So with
6 that, I would entertain a motion to postpone this
7 public hearing to April 25th here in the City
8 Council.
9 MS. SPEARS: So moved.
10 MR. BOCK: Second.
I
11 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Moved and
12 seconded. May I have roll call, please?
i,
13 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Burd.
14 MS. BURD: Aye.
r
15 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: James.
16 MR. JAMES: Aye.
17 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Munns.
18 MR. MUNNS: Aye.
19 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Bock.
20 MR. BOCK: Aye.
21 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Spears.
22 MS. SPEARS: Aye.
23 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Wolfer.
24 MR. WOLFER: Aye. j
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
7
1 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Besco.
2 MR. BESCO: Aye.
3 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Motion is carried.
4 MR. KRAMER: Thank you, Mayor.
5 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Next we have a
6 public hearing. I would entertain a motion to go
7 into public hearing to discuss a petition from
8 Kendall Creek Development, LLC, Petitioners,
9 request to annex to the United City of Yorkville
10 and rezone from Kendall County A -1 Agricultural
11 to United City of Yorkville R -2 One - Family
12 Residence District, and for hearing as to the
13 annexation agreement of petitioner.
14 The real property consists of
15 approximately 141.31 acres south of Route 126,
16 east of Route 47, north of Ament Road, and west
17 of Ashley Road, Kendall Township, Kendall County,
18 Illinois.
l
19 MR. WOLFER: So moved.
20 MR. JAMES: Second.
21 MAYOR PROCHASKA: So moved and
22 seconded. Roll call, please.
23 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Wolfer.
24 MR. WOLFER: Aye.
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
I
I
I
i
8
1 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: James.
2 MR. JAMES: Aye.
3 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Munns.
4 MR. MUNNS: Aye.
5 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Burd.
6 MS. BURD: Aye.
7 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Spears.
8 MS. SPEARS: Aye.
9 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Bock.
10 MR. BOCK: Aye.
'r
11 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Besco.
I
12 MR. BESCO: Aye.
13 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Motion is carried.
14 We are now in public hearing. Is there someone
15 here representing the petitioner?
16 WHEREUPON:
i
17 JAMES OLGUIN,
18 testified before the Yorkville City Council as
19 follows:
I
20 MR. OLGUIN: Thank you, Mayor. My
21 name is Jim Olguin. I am with the law firm of
22 Goldstine, Skrodzki, Russian, Nemec & Hoff. Our
23 offices are located at 835 McClintock Drive in
24 Burr Ridge, and as previously stated tonight, I
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
9
1 am here on behalf of Kendall Creek Development.
2 Also here with me this evening
3 from Kendall Creek Development are Dan Harper and
4 Dave Knott, the project managers for the Hudson
5 Lake Subdivision, which is the subject of our
I
6 various petitions. f
7 The petitioner submitted an
I
8 application for annexation and rezoning of
i
9 approximately 141 acres of property from the
10 present County A -1 District to the City's R -2
11 One - Family Residence District.
12 The property, as shown by this
13 regional map, is located south of Raintree
14 Village, west of the Prestwick of Yorkville.
15 Their requested annexation and
i
16 rezoning is consistent with the city's projected
17 use for this particular property.
18 Once again, the proposed use
19 for the property is consistent with what the city
20 envisions for this particular parcel, and I'll
21 walk back here again.
22 For a more detailed layout of
23 what has been submitted for preliminary plan
24 approval, we have this plan.
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
I
i
10
i
1 It also shows that it's all
2 going to be single- family detached homes.
3 There's going to be no townhome component.
4 There is approximately a
5 ten -acre site, which is immediately south of the
w
6 school site that was established in Raintree
7 Village that we are going to be providing for the
8 school district for possible expansion of their
1
9 facilities, such as ball fields, tennis court,
10 possible additional parking.
11 Based on comments and �I
i
12 discussions we've had with Staff and the
13 consulting engineer, we have realigned some of
14 the roadways based on trying to provide access to
15 that additional school site area, and maintain
16 the Penman Road extension as a nice thoroughfare
17 with limited access to make sure that we are
18 trying to maintain the traffic movement.
19 We have submitted -- and part
20 of what tonight's meeting is about is review of
21 the annexation agreement.
22 We have submitted a copy of a
23 proposed annexation agreement to the city and to
24 the city attorney for review and comment.
i
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
11
1 With that, we'd be happy to
2 answer any questions you might have on either the
3 annexation agreement, the proposed plan, or
i
4 anything else having to do with the subdivision.
5 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Anything else --
I
6 MR. OLGUIN: Oh, I'm sorry, Mayor.
7 Just one more comment on the particular -- on the
8 annexation agreement.
9 During plan council it was
10 suggested if there is any additional -- if there
11 is any deviations from the engineering
12 requirements that the City might have that that
13 might be included in the annexation agreement by
14 attaching any engineering plans to the annexation
15 agreement, so that would be the only addition
16 that we would request, but I think that that
17 would be based on your coming agreement with the
18 city regarding what would be appropriate and
19 acceptable engineering for the site.
20 MAYOR PROCHASKA: At this time I
21 would ask if there is anybody in the audience
22 that would like to give comment, ask questions,
23 anything dealing with this project.
24 (No Response)
i
i
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
i
i
12
1 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Hearing none, I
2 would ask if there is any --
3 MR. KING: How many homes are in j
4 this project? How many homes are in this
5 project?
6 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Can you please
7 stand up and state your name?
8 WHEREUPON:
9 LOREE KING,
10 testified before the Yorkville City Council as
11 follows:
12 MR. KING: My name is Loree King,
4
13 900 East Spring Street. How many homes are in
14 this project.
15 MR. OLGUIN: There is a total of 231
16 units, for -- the total dwelling unit per acre is
17 1.6, so it's not a very intensely used site.
18 It's a pretty low density.
19 MR. KING: You said it was R -2?
20 MR. OLGUIN: R -1. I'm sorry, R -2.
21 MAYOR PROCHASKA: R -2.
22 MR. KING: How much park district is
23 there?
24 MR. OLGUIN: The park site that --
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
13
1 We met with the park board and the park board has
2 not requested that any additional park site be
3 provided, except there is a small corner piece,
4 and I will point it out for the benefit of
5 Council here --
6 MR. KING: That's fine. What's the
7 acres?
8 MR. OLGUIN: The park acreage is
9 just under an acre. And the reason -- and the
10 reason that there was not a park site that was 4
11 specifically designated on this parcel was
i
12 because there is a park site right touching this
13 project on the east, on the Prestwick of
14 Yorkville subdivision.
15 There is also a park site just
16 north adjacent to the school site in the Raintree
17 Village, and I believe there is also another park
18 site immediately to the west in the Windett Ridge
19 subdivision.
20 This is in conjunction with the
21 ten acres that's being given to the school for
22 park -type uses, such as ball fields and tennis
23 courts and things like that, that the park board
24 felt that no additional park site was needed.
i
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
i
14
I
1 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Okay. Have you
2 had that discussion with the school district as
3 far as I think you have added the additional
4 acreage? d
5 MR. OLGUIN: Yes. And actually this 1
6 is based on comments that we have received from
7 the school, one about the size, two about the
8 location of the street.
I
9 Some of the previous versions
10 of this plan showed this Boulder Ridge Drive
11 south of a line of homes bordering the parcel.
12 The school district doesn't
13 have a concrete plan yet regarding what's going
14 to be here and what -- you know, if they would
15 want an additional access point off of that
16 roadway, so what we did at their request was to
17 move Boulder Ridge so it does touch a good
18 portion of their parcel, so if need be, they
19 could adjust any access points.
20 Also it would allow for, you
21 know, kids who are walking to access the school
22 site without necessarily cutting through people's
23 yards.
24 So those were based on comments
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -DO 30
I
i
15
1 that we did receive.
2 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Sir, do you have
3 any other questions?
4 MR. KING: One other question. As
5 most people in this room know, we just had a
p �
6 referendum pass. We can't afford to fund our
7 schools.
8 Are you going to do brick and
9 mortar there or just land?
10 MR. OLGUIN: Actually it is going to
11 be a combination of land and cash that is given
i
12 to the school district in accordance with the
13 requirements.
14 MR. KING: What is the intended
15 impact value per lot?
16 MR. OLGUIN: As far as -- I don't
17 know what the -- The school does have a
18 calculation of per unit, but it's going to depend
19 on how big the different homes are, and unlike a
I
20 lot of developments that you see in the community
21 here, our developer doesn't do all the
22 construction, doesn't build all the homes, so
23 you're going to get a different look among the
24 various -- you are going to have different
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
i
16
I
I
I
1 products and different homes that are going to be
2 built here, so it's difficult for the developer
3 to specifically identify how many three- bedroom
4 homes, how many four - bedroom homes are going to
5 be within the site, and that would have an impact
6 on the number of kids it generates, so that makes
7 it difficult, too.
8 MR. KING: That's a key value as far
i
9 as the values for our schools.
10 MR. OLGUIN: Sure. And I think
I
11 that's one of the reasons the school district
I
12 requested the additional land to provide
13 additional room, to be able to service any
14 additional kids not only for this site, but all
15 the ones that will be feeding into that school.
16 MR. KING: Last question. How many
17 accesses do you have to main thoroughfares?
18 MR. OLGUIN: There is actually --
19 Did you want to take a look at this plan? There
20 are access points to the south, two to the south,
21 two to the east -- I'm sorry, one to the east,
22 one to the north to the existing connecting
23 point, and to the west as well.
24 MR. KING: Thank you.
I
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
I
I
17
i
I
1 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Anyone else?
2 Paul.
3 MR. JAMES: I've got a couple
i
4 questions. As for the parks, the surrounding
5 parks that are in there, so you are still
6 contributing to the parks, the way you are going
7 to do it is land cash.
i
8 MR. OLGUIN: Correct.
9 MR. JAMES: So instead of putting a
10 park site there, they're going to be giving money
11 to the park department, and then they are going
I
12 to use that money in the facilities, so that p,
13 brings up a question about the school.
14 You said it's an additional ten
15 acres next to an existing school site.
16 MR. OLGUIN: Right.
l 17 MR. JAMES: So what size is -- How
18 much land is at that school site? And are they
I
19 looking just to add ten acres of land and not put
I
I
20 a school there?
21 MAYOR PROCHASKA: I believe the
22 referendum, that's where I believe the middle
23 school site is to be built.
24 MR. JAMES: Correct. But that
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
18
i
1 additional ten acres, the school will be on that
2 additional ten acres, or is that just for extra
3 open space?
4 MR. OLGUIN: Based on the plans that
5 I have seen -- But, once again, I'm not sure if
6 the school has a firm plan that they have
7 completely accepted.
8 I have talked to the people
I
9 that are doing their planning for them and they
i
10 showed me a plan of a building that is located
11 entirely within the property in the Raintree
I
12 Village subdivision. '
r
13 MR. JAMES: That's what I thought.
14 MR. OLGUIN: The additional land
15 it's my understanding is for additional ball
16 fields, possible tennis courts, some possible
17 additional parking if they believe it's
18 necessary, but it's mainly I think additional
I
19 amenities for the -- for that school.
I
20 There is already I believe a
21 track and stadium facility that is also meant to
22 be constructed entirely on the Raintree Village
23 site.
24 MR. JAMES: So you have the option
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
19
1 of giving the ten acres as land or giving cash to
2 the school, correct?
3 MR. OLGUIN: Well, actually our
4 original plan showed an entire cash donation to
5 the school district.
6 MR. JAMES: So your original plan
7 had a cash donation to the school district --
8 MR. OLGUIN: Correct..
9 MR. JAMES: -- and they opted for
10 land?
i
11 MR. OLGUIN: Right. They said that
i
12 they wanted land. I think that there is a total
13 of approximately 15 acres that we are responsible
14 for providing the school district. They opted
15 for ten acres, plus the other five in cash.
16 And also we are -- In order so
17 that all this property is going to be usable,
18 they requested that we accommodate all the
19 detention for those additional ten acres within
20 our subdivision, and we have agreed to do that.
21 MR. JAMES: What was that amount
22 of -- Do you remember the cash amount?
23 MR. OLGUIN: That I don't recall.
24 MR. JAMES: Because I'm just curious !
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
20
1 that they are opting for the land versus the
2 money and they've already got enough land to put
3 a school on, all this is going to be is open
4 space next to a school.
5 It just seems like when they
6 are a little bit strapped for cash, they should
7 be looking for the cash and not for the land.
i
8 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Okay. Again,
9 that's why we asked the school district to look
10 at that and give us their comments. Yes, Rose.
11 MS. SPEARS: I have a couple of
12 comments. I would suggest that we revise the
13 portion -- the top portion on Page 4 where it
14 says city development fees, and they are making a
15 specific amount.
16 I would like it to say city
,i
17 development fees as required by city ordinance
18 because the fees continuously change.
19 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Well, that's -- I
20 think we are getting into the thing about not
21 being Home Rule and setting fees. Can we -- I
22 don't know if we can open that.
23 MS. SPEARS: So if our fees do
24 change and he has not -- this development has not
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
21
1 built out, then they are locked into these fees
2 here?
3 MAYOR PROCHASKA: No. Actually, if
4 you look, there is a provision in here -- In
5 fact, I was just looking at it. It says that
6 they asked that they be locked for five years,
7 but after. that they can change according to
8 whatever the fees --
9 MR. JAMES: So if they don't develop
10 in five years and then fees go up after five
11 years, then they would be subject to that?
i
12 MAYOR PROCHASKA: And I am not
13 opposed to looking at shortening that time
14 because, again, that's one of the issues that
i
15 happens, that if things sit out there too long --
16 MS. SPEARS: But we could do that if
17 we so choose, correct, rather than saying the
18 five years?
19 MAYOR PROCHASKA: That's a good
20 question. I guess we need to have our attorney
21 handle that because he had always told me that's
22 what the fees were, that we were locked --
23 MR. WYETH: As part of the
24 agreement, it can be a variety of things. Now
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 --0030
22
1 that we understand what they are asking for,
2 could it be open -ended at any point in time.
3 MS. SPEARS: Exactly.
4 MR. WYETH: I'm sure Mr. Olguin has
5 a different opinion on that.
i
6 MR. OLGUIN: Our concern is that --
7 Obviously we don't have any objection and the
8 information that we had on that Page 4 what the
9 fees are are based on our understanding of what
i
10 the city's fees currently are.
I
11 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Sure.
12 MR. OLGUIN: If at the time that we
13 are -- that this annexation agreement is coming
14 u those fees were different obviously, it would
P Y
15 make sense to have those correct fees within
16 here.
17 From the development point,
18 there is some importance to having at least the
19 fees locked in for a period of time because once
20 they start developing, they are basing their
21 pricing of their lots, the contracts that they
22 are entering into, once again they're not going
23 to do -- it's not going to be -- they are not
24 going to develop out the entire development based
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
23
1 on a handful of models, they are selling it to
2 various builders, and the pricing is very
3 important for them to know because they have to
4 pay up front. If that increases, that affects
5 the value of the lots.
6 And also our purchasers of the
7 lot want to know and lock in if they are going to
8 be responsible for these fees, what those fees
9 are going to be, and there is always a lag time
I
10 between the time that you approve the subdivision
11 and all the public improvements were located, and
12 that could take a year or two just to get all the
13 public improvements in place so that the lots can
14 actually be built upon, and during that time
15 period, lots are being sold.
16 And, once again, we want to try
17 to have at least some -- some structure there
18 that we know what the costs are going to be when
19 we market them, they can do it and make sure
20 that, one, it's going to be profitable for them,
21 and the builder is also going to know what they
22 are paying for, so that's the basis why we are
23 trying to lock in.
I
24 MS. SPEARS: But from the city's
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
i
24
1 standpoint, we have realized, and also the school
2 district, our fees really need to be increased,
3 we are running out of building space here, the
4 schools need additional money, and these are all
5 things we are going to have to address, and I am
f
6 not comfortable with locking fees in right now
7 for a five -year period because we are growing so
i
8 rapidly and we keep getting more developments in
9 here.
10 And also, have you selected f
11 names for your streets yet?
12 MR. OLGUIN: Yes, actually we have
i,
13 selected some streets, and they are identified in
14 the subdivision packets.
15 MS. SPEARS: Did you select any from
16 our historical list?
17 MR. OLGUIN: Yes, there was.
18 MS. SPEARS: How many did you get?
19 Was it a percentage?
20 MR. OLGUIN: No, I think there was
21 just probably one, one name from the historical
22 list.
23 MS. SPEARS: That's all I have.
24 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Again, just
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
I
25
1 listening -- Because I don't disagree with what
2 you are saying, Rose. The big thing that I was
3 told is that when we do this, we have to set the
i
4 fees here, and John just said, set something.
5 They can change it.
6 But somehow we have to set fees
7 in the agreement, and either then they can -- you
I
8 know, whenever they replat they do it or -- you j
9 know, I think the verbiage we put on there, as
10 long as it's spread equally across -- how would
9
11 that go, equally spread across town, we can --
f
12 they can all go up because we do that I know with
13 some of the connection fees, because if it's the
14 same across town, if it's equally applied --
15 MR. WYETH: Equally applied.
16 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Equally applied.
17 There is some advantage there that would allow
� � f
18 those fees to be applied across.
{
19 Because I agree that -- I
20 understand the need for consistency, but I also
21 understand the need that sometimes things sit for
22 five or six or eight or ten years and all of a
23 sudden the fee that was set up then is no longer
24 valid, so --
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
26
1 MS. SPEARS: Maybe we can limit it
2 to two or three years also at this time instead
3 of being at five.
4 MAYOR PROCHASKA: That's what I was
5 thinking, maybe a shorter time. Maybe tie it
I
6 that the fee would come into effect when that
7 particular thing was platted, not necessarily
8 annexation. Those are things we can look at.
9 Anything else? Paul.
10 MR. JAMES: Yeah. On the main
11 roads, is there plans to put turn lanes on
12 Route 47, 126, Ament Road and Ashley Road?
i
i
13 I know that you don't abut to
14 them, but if you did, that's something that we
I
15 would be requesting, is that you put in turn
16 lanes, because you've a got a unique piece of
17 property that kind of sits in the center and you
18 are surrounded by all the other properties.
19 I really think that we should
I
20 be looking at making sure that we've got proper
21 turn lanes to all the major roads, and if we
22 don't have them on 126 and 47, maybe even on
23 Ament and Ashley Road they should be added.
24 MR. OLGUIN: And I think 126 already
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
27
1 required turn lanes as part of the subdivision --
2 to the Crossroad subdivision, so I believe that's
3 already been addressed as far as 126, and as part
4 of this development, part of the process that we
5 are going through with the preliminary plat, city
i
6 staff has requested -- and we already provided
7 one traffic study and it has requested that it be
8 updated based on some of the changes that have
9 been made to the plan, so that's going to be
10 submitted to the city for review as well.
i
I
11 MR. JAMES: Okay. So it sounds like
12 126 is kind of taken care of, but let's not
i
13 forget about Ament Road and Ashley Road.
14 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Ament and Ashley
15 Roads, are those township roads? Those are
16 township roads, which means they fall under our
i
17 $2,000 -- that's what they pay -- the $2,000
18 toward upgrading those roads, as the perimeter
19 arterials.
20 My bigger concern would be 47,
21 where there is really no funding for that,
22 because 71 already has turn lanes on it as you go
23 into Raintree, and -- but I don't know if there
24 is plans for anything on 47 on those two
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
i
28
1 entrances into Windett Ridge.
2 MR. JAMES: So basically this
3 development, I want to make sure we've got --
4 it's all off main roads, we've got proper turn
5 lanes to get into this subdivision and don't
6 forget about it because it's a unique subdivision
7 surrounded by all the other lands.
8 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Well, I know the
9 2,000 -- That's why we collect the 2,000 per home
10 for the city, and now the fee is whatever it is,
11 $1,500 for the county, so that we can upgrade h,
12 county roads in that area, too. That's a good
13 point.
14 Anyone else?
15 (No Response)
16 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Okay. And I would
17 entertain a motion to close the public hearing.
18 MS. SPEARS: So moved.
19 MS. BURD: Second.
20 MR. WOLFER: Second.
21 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Moved and
22 seconded. May I have roll call, please?
23 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Wolfer.
24 MR. WOLFER: Aye.
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
I
29
1 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: James.
2 MR. JAMES: Aye.
3 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Munns. �
4 MR. MUNNS: Aye.
5 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Burd.
6 MS. BURD: Aye.
7 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Spears.
8 MS. SPEARS: Aye.
9 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Bock.
I
n
10 MR. BOCK: Aye.
9
9
a
11 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Besco.
12 MR. BESCO: Aye.
13 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Motion is carried.
14 Thank you.
15 MR. OLGUIN: Thank you, Mayor.
16 Thank you, Aldermen.
( 17 (Which were all the
18 proceedings had in
1
19 the public hearing
I
20 portion of the
21 meeting.)
22 --- 000 - --
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
i
30
1 STATE OF ILLINOIS )
ss:
2 COUNTY OF LASALLE )
3
4 CHRISTINE M. VITOSH, being first duly
5 sworn, on oath says that she is a Certified
6 Shorthand Reporter doing business in the State of
7 Illinois;
8 That she reported in shorthand the
9 proceedings had at the foregoing public hearing;
10 And that the foregoing is a true and
ti
11 correct transcript of her shorthand notes so
12 taken as aforesaid and contains all the
i
13 proceedings had at the said public hearing.
14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set
15 m h d this _I�ay of
16 — 2006.
17
18
19 b'
20 _ _
CHRISTIN M VITOSH, C.S.R.
21 CSR License No. 084 - 002883
22
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030
I
i
Yorkville City Council 31
March 28, 2006
$1,500 28:11, 28:11 acreage 13:8, 14:4 27:22 B -3 3:9
$2,000 27:17, 27:17, acres 3:13, 7:15, 9:9, amenities 18:19 back 9:21
27:17, 27:17 13:7, 13:21, 17:15, Ament 3:14, 7:16, ball 10:9, 13:22,
00300 2:16 17:19, 18:1, 18:2, 26:12, 26:23, 27:13, 18:15
084 - 002883 30:24 19:1, 19:13, 19:15, 27:14 Bank 3:6
1. 12:17 19:19 among 15:23 Based 10:11, 10:14,
12 7:15, 26:12, 27:3 across 25:10, 25:11, amount 19:21, 19:22, 11:17, 14:6, 14:24,
126 26:22, 26:24, 25:14, 25:18 20:15 18:4, 22:9, 22:24,
27:12 Actually 14:5, 15:10, ANN 2:10 27:8
141 9:9 16:18, 19:3, 21:3, annex 3:7, 7:9 basically 28:2
141.31 7:15 23:14, 24:12 annexation 3:5, 3:11, basing 22:20
15 19:13 add 17:19 7:13, 9:8, 9:15, 10:21, basis 23:22
2,000 28:9, 28:9, added 14:3, 26:23 10:23, 11:3, 11:8, behalf 2:19, 9:1
28:9, 28:9 addition 11:15 11:13, 11:14, 22:13, believe 4:14, 13:17,
200 5:18 additional 10:10, 26:8 17:21, 17:22, 18:17,
2006. 30:18 10:15, 11:10, 13:2, answer 11:2 18:20, 27:2
231 12:15 13:24, 14:3, 14:15, anybody 11:21 benefit 13:4
25th 5:13, 5:18, 6:4, 16:12, 16:13, 16:14, appeared 2:19 BESCO 2:9, 3:16,
6:7 17:14, 18:1, 18:2, application 9:8 3:20, 3:21, 7:1, 7:2, j
380 2:16 18:14, 18:15, 18:17, applied 25:14, 25:15, 8:11, 8:12, 29:11,
4 7:16, 20:13, 22:8, 18:18, 19:19, 24:4 25:16, 25:18 29:12
26:12, 26:22, 2 address 24:5 appropriate 11:18 big 15:19, 25:2 R
47 3:13, 27:24 addressed 27:3 approval 9:24 bigger 27:20
60563 2:17 adjacent 13:16 approve 23:10 bit 20:6
71 27:22 adjourn 4:24 approximately 3:13, board 13:1, 13:1,
7:00 1:9, 1:9 adjust 14:19 7:15, 9:9, 10:4, 19:13 13:23
800 1:9 Administrator 2:11 April 5:13, 5:18, 6:7 BOCK 2:8, 4:4, 4:5,
805 3:6 advantage 25:17 area 10:15, 28:12 6:10, 6:19, 6:20, 8:9,
835 8:23 affects 23:4 arterials 27:19 8:10, 29:9, 29:10
9.81 3:13 afford 15:6 ARTHUR 2:2 bordering 14:11
900 12:13 aforesaid 30:14 Ashley 7:17, 26:12, Boulder 14:10, 14:17
afternoon 4:23 26:23, 27:13, 27:14 brick 15:8
agree 25:19 attaching 11:14 brings 17:13
<A> agreed 19:20 Attorney 4:22, 10:24, BROMBEREK 2:15
A -1 3:8, 7:10, 9:10 agreement 3:11, 7:13, 21:20 build 15:22
able 16:13 10:21, 10:23, 11:3, audience 11:21 builder 23:21
above - entitled 1:7 11:8, 11:13, 11:15, Avenue 2:16 builders 23:2
abut 26:13 11:17, 21:24, 22:13, Aye 3:21, 3:23, 4:1, building 18:10, 24:3
acceptable 11:19 25:7 4:3, 4:5, 4:7, 4:9, built 16:2, 17:23,
accepted 18:7 Agricultural 3:8, 7:10 6:14, 6:16, 6:18, 6:20, 21:1, 23:14
access 10:14, 10:17, Alderman 2:3, 2:4, 6:22, 6:24, 7:2, 7:24, BURD 2:5, 3:22, 3:23,
14:15, 14:19, 14:21, 2:5, 2:6, 2:7, 2:8, 2:9 8:2, 8:4, 8:6, 8:8, 6:13, 6:14, 8:5, 8:6,
16:20 Aldermen 29:16 8:10, 8:12, 28:24, 28:19, 29:5, 29:6
accesses 16:17 Alderwoman 2:10 29:2, 29:4, 29:6, 29:8, Burr 8:24
accommodate 19:18 Allegiance 3:1 29:10, 29:12 Business 3:9, 30:8
accordance 15:12 allow 14:20, 25:17
according 21:7 already 18:20, 20:2,
acre 12:16, 13:9 26 :24, 27:3, 27:6, <B> < C >
Depo Court Reporting Service
(630) 983 -0030
I
Yorkville City Council 32
March 28, 2006
C.S.R. 1:8, 30:23 connecting 16:22 department 17:11 11:14, 11:19
calculation 15:18 connection 25:13 depend 15:18 enough 5:14, 20:2
call 3:19, 6:12, 7:22, consistency 25:20 designated 13:11 entering 22:22
28:22 consistent 9:16, 9:19 detached 10:2 entertain 3:2, 5:12,
care 27:12 consists 3:12, 7:14 detailed 9:22 6:6, 7:6, 28:17
carried 7:3, 8:13, constructed 18:22 detention 19:19 entire 19:4, 22:24
29:13 construction 15:22 develop 21:9, 22:24 entirely 18:11, 18:22
cash 15:11, 17:7, consulting 10:13 developer 15:21, 16:2 entrances 28:1
19:1, 19:4, 19:7, contains 30:14 developing 22:20 envisions 9:20
19:15, 19:22, 20:6, continue 6:4 Development 7:8, Equally 25:10, 25:11,
20:7 continuously 20:18 9:1, 9:3, 20:14, 20:17, 25:14, 25:15, 25:16
center 26:17 contracts 22:21 20:24, 22:17, 22:24, established 10:6
certain 4:24 contributing 17:6 27:4, 28:3 evening 9:2
certificate 6:3 copy 10:22 developments 15:20, Exactly 22:3
Certified 30:7 corner 13:3 24:8 except 13:3
chambers 5:19 Correct 5:21, 17:8, deviations 11:11 existing 16:22, 17:15
change 20:18, 20:24, 17:24, 19:2, 19:8, different 15:19, expansion 10:8
21:7, 25:5 21:17, 22:15, 30:13 15:23, 15:24, 16:1, extension 10:16
changes 27:8 costs 23:18 22:5, 22:14 extra 18:2
choose 21:17 Council 1:1, 4:19, difficult 16:2, 16:7
CHRISTINE 1:8, 30:6, 5:18, 6:8 8:18, 11:9, disagree 25:1
30:23 12:10, 13:5 discuss 7:7 <F>
City 1:1, 1:2, 1:10, COUNTY 3:8, 3:15, discussing 3:4 F. 2:2
2:11, 2:12, 2:20, 3:7, 7:10, 7:17, 9:10, discussion 14:2 facilities 10:9, 17:12
3:8, 4:19, 5:18, 6:7, 28:11, 28:12, 30:3 discussions 10:12 facility 18:21
7:9, 7:11, 8:18, 9:10, couple 17:3, 20:11 District 3:9, 3:10, fact 21:5
9:16, 9:19, 10:23, court 10:9 7:12, 9:10, 9:11, 10:8, fall 27:16
10:24, 11:12, 11:18, courts 13:23, 18:16 12:22, 14:2, 14:12, far 14:3, 15:16, 16:8,
12:10, 20:14, 20:16, Creek 7:8, 9:1, 9:3 15:12, 16:11, 19:5, 27:3
20:17, 22:10, 23:24, CROIS 2:11 19:7, 19:14, 20:9, Farm 1:9
27:5, 27:10, 28:10 Crossroad 27:2 24:2 fee 25:23, 26:6, 28:10
Clerk 2:12 CSR 30:24 doing 18:9, 30:8 feeding 16:15
close 28:17 curious 19:24 donation 19:4, 19:7 fees 20:14, 20:17,
collect 28:9 currently 22:10 Drive 8:23, 14:10 20:18, 20:21, 20:23,
combination 15:11 cutting 14:22 duly 30:6 21:1, 21:8, 21:10,
comfortable 24:6 During 11:9, 23:14 21:22, 22:9, 22:10,
coming 11:17,22:13 dwelling 12:16 22:14, 22:15, 22:19,
comment 10:24,11:7, <D> 23:8, 23:8, 24:2, 24:6,
11:22 Dan 9:3 25:4, 25:6, 25:13,
comments 10:11, DANIEL 4:18 <E> 25:18
14:6, 14:24, 20:10, date 4:13, 4:14, 4:24, East 2:16, 7:16, felt 13:24
20:12 5:13, 5:17, 5:23 12:13, 13:13, 16:21, fields 10:9, 13:22,
community 15:20 dates 5:21 16:21 18:16
completely 18:7 Dave 9:4 effect 26:6 Fifth 2:16
component 10:3 day 30:17 eight 25:22 fine 6:2, 13:6
concern 22:6, 27:20 dealing 11:23 either 11:2, 25:7 firm 8:21, 18:6
concrete 14:13 DEAN 2:6 engineer 10:13 first 4:11, 30:6
conjunction 13:20 density 12:18 engineering 11:11, five 19:15, 21:6,
Depo Court Reporting Service
(630) 983 -0030
Yorkville City Council 33
March 28, 2006
21:10, 21:10, 21:18, 12:4, 12:13, 14:11, JUSTIN 2:18 little 20:6
25:22, 26:3 15:19, 15:22, 16:1, LLC 7:8
five -year 24:7 16:4, 16:4 located 3:13, 8:23,
follows 4:20, 8:19, hour 1:9 <K> 9:13, 18:10, 23:11
12:11 Hudson 9:4 keep 24:8 location 14:8
foregoing 30:11, Kendall 3:8, 3:15, lock 23:7, 23:23
30:12 3:15, 7:8, 7:10, 7:17, locked 21:1, 21:6,
forget 27:13, 28:6 <1> 7:17, 9:1, 9:3 21:22, 22:19
four - bedroom 16:4 identified 24:13 key 16:8 locking 24:6
front 23:4 identify 16:3 kids 14:21, 16:6, long 21:15, 25:10
fund 15:6 Illinois 1:2, 1:10, 16:14 longer 25:23
funding 27:21 2:17, 2:20, 3:15, 7:18, kind 26:17, 27:12 look 15:23, 16:19,
30:1, 30:9 KING 12:3, 12:9, 20:9, 21:4, 26:8
immediately 10:5, 12:12, 12:12, 12:19, looking 17:19, 20:7,
<G> 13:18 12:22, 13:6, 15:4, 21:5, 21:13, 26:20
Game 1:9 impact 15:15, 16:5 15:14, 16:8, 16:16, Loree 12:9, 12:12
generates 16:6 importance 22:18 16:24 lot 15:15, 15:20, 23:7
getting 20:20, 24:8 important 23:3 Kleinwachter 3:5 lots 22:21, 23:5,
give 5:8, 11:22, 20:10 improvements 23:11, Knott 9:4 23:13, 23:15
given 13:21, 15:11 23:13 KRAMER 4:18,4:21, low 12:18
giving 17:10, 19:1, in. 23:23 5:20, 6:1, 7:4
19:1 included 11:13
Goldstine 8:22 incorrect 4:13 < M >
growing 24:7 increased 24:2 <L> M. 1:8, 30:6, 30:23
guess 5:5, 21:20 increases 23:4 lag 23:9 main 16:17, 26:10,
individual 5:21 Lake 9:5 28:4
information 22:8 land 15:9, 15:11, mainly 18:18
<H> instead 17:9, 26:2 16:12, 17:7, 17:18, maintain 10:15, 10:18
hand 30:17 intended 15:14 17:19, 18:14, 19:1, major 26:21
handful 23:1 intensely 12:17 19:10, 19:12, 20:1, managers 9:4
handle 21:21 issues 21:14 20:2, 20:7 map 9:13
happens 21:15 lands 28:7 market 23:19
happy 11:1 lanes 26:11, 26:16, MARTY 2:7
Harper 9:3 <J> 26:21, 27:1, 27:22, matter 1:7
Hearing 3:3, 3:10, J. 4:18 28:5 Mcclintock 8:23
4:11, 4:12, 4:14, 4:23, JACQUELYN 2:12 LASALLE 30:3 means 27:16
5:9, 5:13, 6:7, 7:6, JAMES 2:3, 2:8, 3:17, Last 16:16 meant 18:21
7:7, 7:12, 8:14,12:1, 3:24, 4:1, 6:15, 6:16, law 8:21 MEETING 1:1, 1:6,
28:17, 29:19, 30:11, 7:20, 8:1, 8:2, 8:17, layout 9:22 10:20
30:15 17:3, 17:9, 17:17, least 22:18, 23:17 meeting. 29:21
HEITZ 2:15 17:24, 18:13, 18:24, Legion 3:14 met 13:1
Herb 3:5 19:6, 19:9, 19:21, LESLIE 2:4 middle 17:22
hereunto 30:16 19:24, 21:9, 26:10, License 30:24 MILSCHEWSKI 2:12,
historical 24:16, 27:11, 28:2, 29:1, 29:2 limit 26:1 3:20, 3:22, 3:24, 4:2,
24:21 JASON 2:4 limited 10:17 4:4, 4:6, 4:8, 6:13,
Hoff 8:22 Jim 8:21 line 14:11 6:15, 6:17, 6:19, 6:21,
Home 20:21, 28:9 John 2:11, 2:18, 25:4 list 24:16, 24:22 6:23, 7:1, 7:23, 8:1,
homes 10:2,12:3, JOSEPH 2:9 listening 25:1 8:3, 8:5, 8:7, 8:9, 8:11,
Depo Court Reporting Service
(630) 983 -0030
Yorkville City Council 34
March 28, 2006
28:23, 29:1, 29:3, 22:14 13:1, 13:1, 13:2, 13:8, portion 14:18, 20:13,
29:5, 29:7, 29:9, 29:11 offices 8:23 13:10, 13:12, 13:15, 20:13, 29:20
models 23:1 Okay 4:10, 5:17, 6:5, 13:17, 13:23, 13:24, possible 10:8, 10:10,
money 17:10,17:12, 14:1, 20:8, 27:11, 17:10, 17:11 18:16, 18:16
20:2, 24:4 28:16 park -type 13:22 posting 4:12, 5:24,
mortar 15:9 Old 3:6 parking 10:10, 18:17 6:1
Motion 3:3, 5:12, 6:6, OLGUIN 8:17, 8:20, parks 17:4, 17:5, 17:6 postpone 4:15, 5:12,
7:3, 7:6, 8:13, 28:17, 8:21, 11:6, 12:15, part 10:19, 21:23, 6:6
29:13 12:20, 12:24, 13:8, 27:1, 27:3, 27:4 preliminary 9:23,
1 move 14:17 14:5, 15:10, 15:16, particular 5:8, 9:17, 27:5
Moved 3:16, 3:18, 16:10, 16:18, 17:8, 9:20, 11:7, 26:7 present 9:10
6:9, 6:11, 7:19, 7:21, 17:16, 18:4, 18:14, pass 15:6 Prestwick 9:14, 13:13
28:18, 28:21 19:3, 19:8, 19:11, Paul 2:3, 17:2, 26:9 pretty 12:18
movement 10:18 19:23, 22:4, 22:6, pay 23:4, 27:17 previous 14:9
MUNNS 2:7, 4:2, 4:3, 22:12, 24:12, 24:17, paying 23:22 previously 8:24
6:17, 6:18, 8:3, 8:4, 24:20, 26:24, 29:15 Penman 10:16 pricing 22:21, 23:2
29:3, 29:4 Once 9:18, 18:5, people 5:1, 14:22, probably 4:15, 24:21
22:19, 22:22, 23:16 15:5, 18:8 PROCEEDINGS 1:6,
One 11:7, 14:7, 15:4, per 12:16, 15:15, 29:18, 30:11, 30:15
<N> 16:11, 16:21, 16:22, 15:18, 28:9 process 27:4
name 8:21, 12:7, 21:14, 24:21, 27:7 percentage 24:19 PROCHASKA 2:2, j
12:12, 24:21 One - family 3:10, perimeter 27:18 3:2, 3:18, 4:10, 5:2,
names 24:11 7:11, 9:11 period 22:19, 23:15, 5:11, 5:17, 5:24,6:5,
Naperville 2:17 ones 16:15 24:7 6:11, 7:3, 7:5, 7:21,
National 3:6 open 4:23, 18:3, 20:3, petition 3:4, 7:7 8:13, 11:5, 11:20,
necessarily 14:22, 20:22 petitioner 3:11, 7:13, 12:1, 12:6, 12:21, j
26:7 open -ended 22:2 8:15, 9:7 14:1, 15:2, 17:1,
necessary 18.18 opened 5:3 Petitioners 7:8 17:21, 20:8, 20:19,
need 4:11, 4:15, opinion 22:5 petitions 9:6 21:3, 21:12, 21:19,
14:18, 21:20, 24:2, opposed 21:13 piece 13:3, 26:16 22:11, 24:24, 25:16,
24:4, 25:20, 25:21 opted 19:9, 19:14 place 23:13 26:4, 27:14, 28:8, j
needed 13:24 opting 20:1 plan 9:23, 9:24, 11:3, 28:16, 28:21, 29:13
Nemec 8:22 option 18:24 11:9, 14:10, 14:13, products 16:1
Next 7:5, 17:15, 20:4 order 19:16 16:19, 18:6, 18:10, profitable 23:20
nice 10:16 ordinance 20:17 19:4, 19:6, 27:9 project 9:4, 11:23,
No. 21:3, 30:24 original 19:4, 19:6 planning 18:9 12:4, 12:5, 12:14,
none 12:1 owners 5:21 plans 11:14, 18:4, 13:13
north 3:14, 7:16, 26:11, 27:24 projected 9:16
13:16, 16:22 plat 27:5 proper 26:20, 28:4
notes 30:13 <P> platted 26:7 properties 26:18
notice 5:15 P.M. 1:9 please 3:19, 6:12, property 3:12, 7:14,
number 16:6 packets 24:14 7:22, 12:6, 28:22 9:9, 9:12, 9:17, 9:19,
Page 20:13, 22:8 Pledge 3:1 18:11, 19:17, 26:17
Pam 3:5 plus 19:15 proposed 9:18,
< O > paper 4:13 poin 16:23, 22:17 10:23, 11:3
oath 30:7 parcel 9:20, 13:11, point 13:4, 14:15, provide 10:14, 16:12
objection 22:7 14:11, 14:18 22:2, 28:13 provided 13:3, 27:6
Obviously 22:7, park 12:22, 12:24, points 14:19, 16:20 providing 10:7, 19:14
Depo Court Reporting Service
(630) 983 -0030
I
Yorkville City Council 35
March 28, 2006
provision 21:4 reported 30:10 says 20:14, 21:5, 30:7 sits 26:17
public 3:3, 4:11, 4:12, Reporter 30:8 school 10:6, 10:8, six 25:22
4:14, 5:8, 5:13, 6:7, representing 8:15 10:15, 13:16, 13:21, size 14:7, 17:17
7:6, 7:7, 8:14, 23:11, request 3:4, 3:6, 7:9, 14:2, 14:7, 14:12, Skrodzki 8:22
23:13, 28:17, 29:19, 11:16, 14:16 14:21, 15:12, 15:17, small 13:3
30:11, 30:15 requested 9:15, 13:2, 16:11, 16:15, 17:13, sold 23:15
publication 6:3 16:12, 19:18, 27:6, 17:15, 17:18, 17:20, somehow 25:6
purchasers 23:6 27:7 17:23, 18:1, 18:6, someone 8:14
purpose 3:4 requesting 26:15 18:19, 19:2, 19:5, sometimes 25:21
put 17:19, 20:2, 25:9, required 20:17, 27:1 19:7, 19:14, 20:3, somewhere 5:22
26:11, 26:15 requirements 11:12, 20:4, 20:9, 24:1 sorry 11:6, 12:20,
putting 17:9 15:13 schools 15:7, 16:9, 16:21
Residence 3:10, 24:4 sounds 27:11
7:12, 9:11 Second 3:6, 3:17, south 3:14, 7:15,
< Q > Response 5:10, 6:10, 28:19, 28:20 9:13, 10:5, 14:11,
question 5:5, 15:4, 11:24, 28:15 second. 7:20 16:20, 16:20
16:16, 17:13, 21:20 responsible 19:13, seconded 3:19, 6:12, space 18:3, 20:4,
questions 11:2, 23:8 7:22, 28:22 24:3
11:22, 15:3, 17:4 review 10:20,10:24, seems 20:5 SPEARS 2:10,4:6, r
27:10 seen 18:5 4:7, 6:9, 6:21, 6:22, C
revise 20:12 select 24:15 8:7, 8:8, 28:18, 29:7,
<R> rezone 3:7, 7:10 selected 24:10, 24:13 29:8
R -1 12:20 rezoning 9:8, 9:16 selling 23:1 specific 20:15
R -2 3:9, 7:11, 9:10, Ridge 8:24,13:18, sense 22:15 specifically 13:11,
12:19, 12:20, 12:21 14:10, 14:17, 28:1 served 5:20 16:3
Raintree 9:13, 10:6, Road 1:9, 3:14, 3:14, Service 3:9, 16:13 spread 25:10, 25:11
13:16, 18:11, 18:22, 7:16, 7:17, 10:16, services 6:3 Spring 12:13
27:23 26:12, 26:12, 26:23, set 25:3, 25:4, 25:6, ss 30:2
rapidly 24:8 27:13, 27:13 25:23, 30:16 stadium 18:21
rather 21:17 Roads 26:11 26:21 setting 20:21 Staff 10:12 27:6
real 3:12, 7:14 27:15, 27:15, 27:16, shortening 21:13 stand 12:7
realigned 10:13 27:18, 28:4, 28:12 shorter 26:5 standpoint 24:1
realized 24:1 roadway 14:16 Shorthand 30:8, start 22:20
-_� really 24:2, 26:19, roadways 10:14 30:10, 30:13 State 12:7, 30:1, 30:8
27:21 Roll 3:19, 6:12, 7:22, showed 14:10,18:10, stated 8:24
reason 13:9, 13:10 28:22 19:4 strapped 20:6 j
reasons 16:11 room 15:5,16:13 shown 9:12 Street 12:13, 14:8
recall 19:23 Rose 2:10, 20:10, shows 10:1 streets 24:11, 24:13
receive 15:1 25:2 single - family 10:2 structure 23:17
received 14:6 Route 3:13 7:15 Sir 5:16 15:2 study 27:7
referendum 15:6, 7:16, 26:12 sit 21:15, 25:21 Subdivision 9:5,
17:22 Rule 20:21 site 10:5, 10:6, 10:15, 11:4, 13:14, 13:19,
regarding 11:18, running 24:3 11:19, 12:17, 12:24, 18:12, 19:20, 23:10,
14:13 Russian 8:22 13:2, 13:10, 13:12, 24:14, 27:1, 27:2,
regional 9:13 13:15, 13:16, 13:18, 28:5, 28:6
remember 19:22 13:24, 14:22, 16:5, subject 9:5, 21:11
replat 25:8 <S> 16:14, 17:10, 17:15, submitted 9:7, 9:23,
REPORT 1:6 saying 21:17, 25:2 17:18, 17:23, 18:23 10:19, 10:22, 27:10
Depo Court Reporting Service
(630) 983 -0030
Yorkville City Council 36
March 28, 2006
sudden 25:23 try 23:16 walk 9:21
suggest 4:21, 20:12 trying 10:14, 10:18, walking 14:21
suggested 11:10 23:23 wanted 19:12
Suite 2:16 turn 26:11, 26:15, west 7:16, 9:14,
surrounded 26:18, 26:21, 27:1, 27:22, 13:18, 16:23
28:7 28:4 whatever 21:8, 28:10
surrounding 17:4 two 14:7,16:20, whenever 25:8
sworn 30:7 16:21, 23:12, 26:2, WHEREOF 30:16
27:24 WHEREUPON 4:17,
8:16, 12:8
<T> whole 5:6
talked 4:22, 18:8 <U> will 6:2, 6:4, 13:4,
ten 13:21, 17:14, understand 22:1, 16:15, 18:1
17:19, 18:1, 18:2, 25:20, 25:21 Windett 13 28:1
19:1, 19:15, 19:19, understanding 18:15, within 16:5, 18:11,
25:22 22:9 19:19, 22:15
ten -acre 10:5 unique 26:16, 28:6 without 14:22
tennis 10:9, 13:22, unit 12:16,15:18 WITNESS 30:16
18:16 United 1:2, 2:19, 3:7, WOLFER 2:6, 4:8, If
testified 4:19, 8:18, 3:8, 7:9, 7:11 4:9, 6:23, 6:24, 7:19,
12:10 units 12:16 7:23, 7:24, 28:20,
testimony 5:8 unlike 15:19 28:23, 28:24
they've 20:2 updated 27:8 WYETH 2:15, 2:18,
thinking 26:5 upgrade 28:11 4:22, 5:16, 21:23,
thoroughfare 10:16 upgrading 27:18 22:4, 25:15
thoroughfares 16:17 usable 19:17
three 26:2 uses 13:22
three- bedroom 16:3 <Y>
tie 26:5 yards 14:23
tomorrow 4:13 <V> year 23:12
tonight 5:1, 8:24, VALERIE 2:5 years 21:6, 21:10,
10:20 valid 25:24 21:11, 21:18, 25:22,
top 20:13 value 15:15, 16:8, 26:2
1 total 12:15, 12:16, 23:5 Yorkville 1:2, 1:10,
19:12 values 16:9 2:20, 3:7, 3:9, 4:19,
touch 14:17 variety 21:24 7:9, 7:11, 8:18, 9:14,
touching 13:12 various 9:6, 15:24, 12:10, 13:14
toward 27:18 23:2
town 25:11, 25:14 verbiage 25:9
townhome 10:3 versions 14:9 < Dates >
Township 3:15, 7:17, versus 20:1 march 28, 2006 1:8,
27:15, 27:16 Village 9:14, 10:7, 1:8, 1:8
track 18:21 13:17, 18:12, 18:22
traffic 10:18, 27:7 VITOSH 1:8, 30:6,
transcript 30:13 30:23
transcription 5:22
true 30:12
Trust 3:6 < W >
Depo Court Reporting Service
(630) 983 -0030