Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Economic Development Packet 2008 10-07-08
C/p` O United City of Yorkville c T 800 Game Farm Road EST ! 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 . 4 y Telephone: 630-553-4350 9 'ao Fax : 630-553-7575 `LE evv AGENDA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, October 7, 2008 7 :00 PM City Hall Conference Room Presentation: Minutes for Correction/Approval: August 5, 2008 Items Recommended by Plan Commission for Approval: 1 . PC 2008- 18 Richard Marker Associates — Heartland Center Special Use Request for a Drive Through Facility 2 . PC 2008- 19 Urness Land Company (Star European Imports) — Annexation, PUD Zoning and Concept PUD Plan 3 . PC 2008-21 Loren and Rhonda Miller — 1 '/z Mile Review for Rezoning (A- 1 to M- 1 ) 4. EDC 2008-31 Comprehensive Plan Update — Commuter Station Land Use Map Modification New Business: 1 . EDC 2008-42 Monthly Building Permit Report for August 2008 2. EDC 2008-43 Monthly Building Permit Report for September 2008 3 . EDC 2008-44 Monthly Plan Commission Report for September 2008 4. EDC 2008-45 Naturalized Stormwater Basin Management — Discussion Regarding HOA Education 5. EDC 2008-46 Off Street Parking Regulations — Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Reconnnendation 6. EDC 2008-47 Zoning Ordinance Update — Steering Committee Formulation and Project Update 7. EDC 2008-48 Integrated Transportation Plan —Steering Committee Formulation and Project Update 8. EDC 2008-49 Proposed Economic Development Committee 2009 Meeting Schedule Old Business: Additional Business: Economic Development Committee October 7, 2008 Page 2 2008 City Council Goals Economic Development Committee "Evaluate fiscal incemives. " Alderman Golinski Travis Miller Susan Mika "Increase development slandards, with heavy emphasis on multi gamily. " Alderman Besco Travis Miller Alderman Werderich "Facilitate large lot planning areas, with exploration on agricultural Alderman Besco homestead zoning district, and heavy emphasis on snrdying how we can Alderman Werderich Travis Miller make large lots econwnieally viable in the marketplace. " "Bridges to river islands. " Alderman Besco Dave Mogle Alderman Werderich "Open space acquisition. " Alderman Sutcliff Dave Mogle Bart Olson "Strengthen the city 's role in economic development activities. " Alderman Munns Brendan McLaughlin Travis Miller `Land use planning adjacent to Route 47, with research on how we can Alderman Allen Travis Miller help Route 47 expansion via contact rwith Springfield. " UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, October 7, 2008 7 :00 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: 1 . August 5, 2008 ❑ Approved as Presented ❑ Approved with Corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITEMS RECOMMENDED BY PLAN COMMISSION FOR APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 . PC 2008- 18 Richard marker Associates — Heartland Center Special Use Request for a Drive Through Facility ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ------------------- 2. PC 2007- 19 Urness Land Company (Star European Imports) — Annexation, PUD Zoning and Concept PUD Plan ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 . PC 2008-21 Loren and Rhonda Miller — I %2 Mile Review for Rezoning (A- Ito M-1 ) ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2008-31 Comprehensive Plan Update — Commuter Station Land Use Map Modification ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 . EDC 2008-42 Monthly Building Permit Report for August 2008 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2008-43 Monthly Building Permit Report for September 2008 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ InfonnationalItem ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 . EDC 2008-44 Monthly Plan Commission Report for September 2008 ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. EDC 2008-45 Naturalized Stotmwater Basin Management — Discussion Regarding HOA Education ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes 5 . EDC 2008-46 Off Street Parking Regulations — Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Recommendation ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes 6. EDC 2008-47 Zoning Ordinance Update — Steering Committee Formulation and Project Update ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes 7. EDC 2008-48 Integrated Transportation Plan — Steering Committee Formulation and Project Update ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes 8. EDC 2008-49 Proposed Economic Development Committee 2009 Meeting Schedule ❑ Moved forward to CC consent agenda? Y N ❑ Approved by Committee ❑ Bring back to Committee ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ADDITIONAL BUSINESS : --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 1 of 6 RAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, August 5, 2008, 7pin City Conference Room In Attendance: Committee Members Chairman Gary Golinski Alderman Joe Besco Alderman Robert Allen Alderman Marty Munns (left 9:25pm) Other City Officials: Mayor Valerie Burd City Administrator Brendan McLaughlin Alderwoman Robyn Sutcliff Community Development Director Travis Miller Parks & Recreation Director Dave Mogle Other Guests: Lynn Dubajic, YEDC Dan Kramer, Attorney Tony Graff Tony Scott, Kendall County Record John Philipchuck, Attorney Jason Polakow, Pulte Homes Paul Sestak, CMP Properties Paul Dresden, DCS Glenn Richmond, Lennar Jeff Pelock, Mainstreet Commercial Partner Brian Neltzer, Attorney Bob Kenny, Attorney-Sexton Drew Daniels, Sexton Mike Cook, C.M. Lavoie & Assoc. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Gary Golinski at 7:05pm. Presentation: None Minutes for Correction/Approval: July 3, 2008 The minutes were approved as read. Items Recommended by Plan Commission for Approval: L PC 2008-12 Zangler — Annexation and Subdivision Plat This item was tabled until September. (out of sequence) New Business: L EDC 2008-32 Monthly Building Permit Report for June 2008 Travis had no further comments for the June report, but said that the numbers in July will reflect a total of 102 residential permits including townhomes. Also, progress is being made in Autumn Creek. Page 2 of 6 2. EDC 2008-33 Cobblestone Commons Amended Development Agreement and Economic Incentive Agreement Spokesperson Jeff Pelock was on hand to represent Cobblestone. Miller said there were 2 items for action: 1 ) development agreement and 2) incentive agreement. Both items were agreed to in 2007 by the Council, however, neither item was executed. The original incentive agreement only encompassed the stormwater improvements. Final engineering has been approved and the final plats have been approved by staff and will be released when the fees are paid. Staff and legal reviews must also be done. A sales tax rebate will be triggered if the developer has one tenant open for business within a 2-year period. This development originally went through Plan Commission in June 2007. The development agreement with the amendment has not yet been presented to the Commission and Alderman Allen suggested that their input is needed. Travis noted that the physical layout is much the same as the original agreement. Travis will speak with Attorney Orr regarding this agreement and it will appear on the City Council consent agenda on August 26`h 3. EDC 2008-34 Raintree Village SSA Bond — Lennar Transfer to New Developer Attorney Dan Kramer represents the purchasers of the property and he said they are a group of local builders. He said new letters of credit would be brought forth, the balance of the SSA #2 would be taken over and the improvements would be finished.. The annexation agreement will also be assigned to the new buyers. There are 366 new units left to build. This will appear on the City Council consent agenda in the coming week 4. EDC 2008-35 Lincoln Prairie Temporary Stormwater Management Easement Travis said the subdivison plat was approved a few months ago and that approval was subject to an easement being obtained, to get the outfall from this property to the Rob Roy Creek. Lot #2 is likely to be developed prior to the outfall being constructed, consequently a temporary stormwater management system would be needed. Lot 4 is the holding area for overflow. The agreement before the committee would address this temporary situation and would be in place until the outfall is built. Besco asked if the agreement addressed standing water. The overflow should channel to lot 2 and will percolate into the ground. Travis conceded the temporary situation could actually become permanent. If and when all 4 lots are occupied, the permanent solution will automatically be put in place. If the vegetation is preserved, it will prevent the runoff from going directly to the creek. Mayor Burd asked if the State is moving towards mandates to not allow runoff to drain to creeks and rivers directly. This item moves to the next City Council meeting on the consent agenda. Page 3 of 6 5. EDC 2008-36 Rush-Copley/Kendall County Government Center Development Update The following 2 items resulted from a joint meeting of Rush Copley and Kendall County (regarding their courthouse expansion), 1) proposed route for Rush Copley stormwater (they had a temporary route approved). The original proposal would route the water to the Fox River, however, an alternative solution to run it to the east to Blackberry Creek is favored by the City. 2) an easement across County property would be needed. Travis stated there are 2 action items: 1 . A letter of understanding will be needed since Rush Copley does not know when it would proceed with Phase 2 that would trigger this improvement. They want to reach an agreement with Kendall County. 2. A maintenance agreement of the 30' strip of land to be conveyed to the City, but maintained by the County. An inter-governmental agreement has been drafted. Attorney Philipchuck said Phase 2 is the kidney dialysis center and Beecher Road needs to be done soon. This would also allow access to the County building. It was also noted there is a high water table at this point. A deep pipe would allow for water table reduction in this area. Rush also has liability concerns with the strip of Beecher Road near their main entrance that has not yet been dedicated to the City. Briefly, the committee discussed a possible connection between the High School and the government center. It was decided to move this matter forward to the City Council. 6, EDC 2008-37 City Council Goal Action Plan — Open Space Acquisition This is a City Council Goal that is being worked on according to Dave Mogle and is scheduled for the August 14th Park Board meeting. This moves to the August 26`b consent agenda for City Council. 7. EDC 2008-38 Developers Handbook This handbook would serve as a flowchart for developers so that no steps are missed in the development process. Travis noted that the City previously had one in place. Mayor Burd said the handbook should go before the City Council first for review and ultimately return to the Council for final approval after committee review. No finther action taken. 8. EDC 2008-39 CMAP — 2040 Regional Plan Indicators Workshop — Update This workshop was held in Yorkville recently and indicators were identified for the year 2040 vision. The County and most surrounding towns were in attendance. Page 4 of 6 Old Business: L EDC 2008-2I Pulte (Autumn Creek Subdivision) — Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Recapture Agreements Travis noted 2 action items before this committee: 1 . Water Recovery agreement 2. Sanitary Sewer recapture agreement Discussion of water recovery agreement: Pulte had to advance a portion of the water system that MPI had originally contemplated to build as part of their system. This would have been Pulte's 2"a source of water. Due to timing, MPI had not developed yet, but Autumn Creek opted to advance this portion of the agreement. A recapture agreement has not yet been entered into. Staff recommended a consent letter from the Grand Reserve developer acknowledging this agreement. MPI is no longer in control of this property and in order to gain consent, a North Carolina bank must be consulted. Autumn Creek Attorney Jason Polakow, is willing to obtain the consent letter and do the legwork to be able to move forward. This moves to the August 12`h City Council consent agenda. (out of sequence) Items Recommended by Plan Commission for Approval 2 PC 2007-26 Rob Roy Falls Annexation, PUD Zoning/Concept PUD — Status Update DENSITY: Travis said the City is moving forward on the annexation agreement, however, there are some items yet to be negotiated. Density is the first of those considerations. There are 2 residential areas, one being the senior component west of the creek and the other is the Rob Roy Club east of the creek. He said it makes sense to increase the density along the Rt. 34 corridor and the commercial area. However, it was noted that some aldermen will not be comfortable with higher density. The petitioner is asking for flexibility west of the creek where the preference is age 55 and older, which would then allow for higher density. Travis received a letter from the petitioner showing the justification for more units in this area. Mayor Burd asked if infrastructure would be located under the streets (similar to Del Webb). There should be adequate open space to allow for utilities according to Tony Graff. Information regarding Metra standards was requested by Mayor Burd. She said high density along the tracks is needed to contract Metra. There was discussion of the rental properties that require fees for the amenities and the fact that the renter must belong to the club. Age-targeted and age-restricted areas and the number of units were also discussed. Page 5 of 6 BEECHER AND FAXON OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS: Staff has looked at the tax base for widening some major roads. Beecher Road would be extending to Baseline Road, then to Rt. 47 and Faxon Road would be a major east/west connection. It is anticipated that all these improvements would cost $4 million. It is recommended this be included in the annexation agreement. Travis spoke about creating a business district and said that there would be a shortfall between the actual money needed for the entire development with improvements and the actual money to be generated from the business district and other taxes. As a result, he asked the committee for direction on whether Beecher Road is a necessity in this total package. Besco said this is a very necessary component to improve the traffic flow. Mayor Burd noted that Tom Cross had obtained money for Rt. 34 in Oswego and she suggested lobbying for the money. Attorney Kenny said their most challenging projects are recapture and the Beecher Road extension. They view the Beecher Road project as a city project rather than a need for their project. They have a need to get the shopping center built first to generate tax money to pay for the roads. Besco said that transportation has been neglected in other developments and now the City has gridlock. The price tag for Rt. 34 work is about $4 million according to Engineer Mike Cook. The recapture was discussed further and Drew Daniels said the project should be viewed from a 20-year standpoint and the money that will be generated at that point. Besco said that the Fox Hill developer, Paul Dresden, should be addressed regarding the recapture and the relationship to this project. 3. EDC2008-31 Comprehensive Plan Update — Plan Commission Recommendation Golinski said the Metra station is proposed to be located near commercial developments rather than heavily populated areas and he did not feel this was the best location. In the southeast section, the City is looking at 2 units per acre with Joliet offering 10,000 square foot lots. Travis said since this plan was completed, The Plan Commission has realized the need to address this area. Some concessions will need to be made in this area according to Besco. He suggested possible farm preservation like Kane County. The committee agreed that this area is the last one available for estate zoning, but that it may not be possible. Golinski noted that the City should gain control of the Caton Farm Rd. area. It was also agreed that the City should have discussions with landowners with whom the City has pre-annexation agreements and also identify the land the City would like. An incentive plan should be drafted to present to these landowners. It was also agreed that the City should protect the Prairie Parkway area and work with Platteville. Page 6 of 6 The land use map was discussed and the City's liability was questioned if the plan is not followed. It was noted that the map now encompasses land that would be in the Yorkville School District. Golinski said that the City is only 2-3 properties away from the MPI south property. The Comprehensive Plan will come back to EDC in September for further consideration. Additional Business: Alderman Allen volunteered to be a contact with Springfield to support the 2008 City Council goal of land use planning along Rt. 47. Besco asked if the Council had looked any further into economic incentives for industrial uses. Lynn Dubajic said there are some guidelines in place based on job creation. There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 9:55pm. Minutes by Marlys Young, Minute Taker \�Ep cl Py Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� 4 o00 Legal ❑ P � f ssr Z I ` 9 Baas Finance ❑ Engineer ■ Tracking Number F1® p Kz Ni �O Consultant ❑ PC 2008-18 E �ti�e ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Richard Marker Associates — Heartland Center Special Use Request for Drive-Through Meeting and Date: EDC / October 7, 2008 Synopsis: Request for Special Use permit to allow a Drive Through Facility on Lot 7 of the Heartland Center Subdivision (east end of the building) Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: n/a Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: majority Council Action Requested: Approval of Special Use Permit to allow for a Drive-Through Submitted by: Travis Miller Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See staff attached report "�'O cJry V 0 Memorandum I:J lit To: EDC EST. , ��_ 1836 From: Travis Miller/Stephanie Boettcher CC: Lisa Pickering (for distribution) O ® t & \ Date: September 23, 2008 Subject: PC 2008 — 18 Heartland Center (Special Use, Drive Through) Background: The Plan Commission reviewed the Heartland Center proposed drive-through facility for the eastern end of the Heartland Retail Building located at 728 E. Veterans Parkway on September 10, 2008 and made the following action: - Motion to recommend approval in accordance with staff comments. 6 ayes; 0 no The Jackie Dearborn, Civil Engineer recently conducted a survey of drive-through facility regulation in several other municipalities and prepared a report to assist staff when reviewing the appropriateness of drive-through facilities. This report (May 5, 2008) is attached for your use and reference. Staff Comments/Recommendations: 1 . The location and 11 ' width of the drive-through lane is generally acceptable. 2. The intended user of the drive-through is a coffee shop. According to staff research, four (4) spaces provided in the stacking lane are adequate. The proposed facility includes a stacking lane of 80' that provides for 4-5 spaces beginning with the window location back to where the striping begins for the lane. The location of the menu/order board allows for one car at the board, one car at the window, one car in between and one car behind the menu board. 3. Sidewalk along the east side of the building, along with an existing man-door, should be eliminated from site/building. 4. The introduction of one-way traffic in the parking area east of the drive-through was recommended by staff during the Plan Council review in order to minimize confusion between motorist exiting the drive-through lane and those not using the drive-through. Special Use Standards (10-14-6 of Zoning Ordinance) F. Standards: No special use shall be recommended by the Plan Commission unless said Commission shall find that: 1 . The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. 2. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. 3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. 1 4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. 5. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. 6. The special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the City Council pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan Commission. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-74) 2 'i C: •-• 11111•�'i! • i�PJ• JiiPOii Ji i 1• 1'i i•" �� • •e•r ei i1i•.i 1's•� •Iil�1•°i•{•*0 ••°�1�'{'�•{' r1°O♦•••1•� •° �1 '• • u • •♦S'JP• S'Pi40'P•OhOfi {fOPi•Oe0'O r1••IIi♦'1•.. : •••.. 1.�•f1• •- •f•f•♦••••f• •1{ef••fi 1°•••11.1 i••♦1♦1•e!♦1•i i✓•-1.. 1••° �1••Ie'111•if�•r10♦1 V" •.'1•••e• ♦••If1•If♦•i{If!•e�1�1�f�1° .f�f�•11•1'ff•M.:.' ••••••1!•1•••••1!•.... •1 ••1.1x1.11• G ••1• •Lee.•.flw 1• q• ••I e' 1111111 i 1°i i i�1i s1i 11�°�L�i ii i u -. ♦�1�'i.1i•I�I�Ii°eeie�•1 Ie1'a1.. ••'rP•D 1 i i•i•�♦•Ii•IIf1•ee�•f1'•ei'!1 1.1♦•1•••111.�l�1�1�•♦e.•.•.•.1!• 1!♦♦ 1, 11♦••1•ef♦{♦If lf•ffif lff•ff11♦11111{111••1• Ii�ix•�xx,�•,♦.r•• 1♦♦ ♦•f. ♦ • •1•f•♦ ♦11♦♦1♦ef♦♦•ef♦e♦♦ee1•♦1•e•1••f♦e•1' ♦•1 1•'1'�•1'i i i i i i•♦1'11•••1.1{°111.1 1!e•�. 1••�1_� 1..�.e111��1•�{e••e1••f1e••IIIe1ef••••••11•{e•Ilfee111e1ee11•{•Ie1.1•Ie••••••{{1.1•� 11 1 1 1.1 1 1 1 1 O 1 1 1 1 1.1 1 1♦•1,.•1••1♦ e ` 1♦� �11111•�i x•1'11{1•'••{e11.1•'•'•1•'•••'••1•{'•1.1••••e'{1••1'•'•••11'♦'••1°•1•'{� •1111111.1••11.1°• 1♦ •11.1••1♦ •.1 11.111.1••11.1•Irr.r • ••1.1•♦ ••• 111.•111•r••.r•IIIe••11••If••1!•!!•♦IfIf 1• I�111• •1�•°11♦1♦1��111111♦�.r11 x•11111♦!11111.111 I.1• ��11•�..feelefe•1!1•{{1��{•IIf••111{•111•IIe•1•••1•f•111•••11{•{••1•f•11•f••11•� •. ............1111111♦111°♦11111•••°1°•1•i♦•'.•• - '�•1•'{!1•x11♦r°• i��e. "e.1{{111.1.1♦Ie{{!'111'Ie1•.r11♦1••{1'•'e•1•!'111•••1••'e•••1•!1•e•f•11'•f111•1{e11•1 r.1 . ,• 1x1.11♦1.11111x.•• 19 1•: -Je 1�1 11••1•••e••••••1••••••{1•••••••1♦1••1• •1.•��1 yx•1•♦{11••1•♦ 1 1♦..y. Ix • 1 ♦1.11••1••u••1 ♦ 1•x!•♦111•{..•e ♦•I.I.�I��i11•• 1.'•.1..e1l11 lfx♦1•♦111111.1.1••!1••x•1!•1 1•x•x11.1.1{••♦ • n .1.•.••1 .1♦II♦ee-•=x:•1111111111•IIIe1111111.1•e•��e111.1•If 111♦Ie1••Iee111 11•IIe11••Ilef•11111••••1•••1•� 1'V w••... lLe 1�•e♦IIf•1•. e•elfelf•Ie1f•••{efflef a//fe ♦♦l11x••'f'f•••. .,1♦•!{llffi••Iff1e11x{{•f lxl♦f1♦•{•♦f{ 111.1°x�111�e1ex�•{�x1.1111°111.11 IIe'�•�1•i 1�•'1 1 1�•,•I:IIe1e1{•1�•IIe1•ff{♦1•••111••{Ie•••fIf♦111{fee1.1.1{Iefe1•f•1{ 111•r••1••e111.1••1111„•♦11x••• •x.'11•... 1.1{IIIIIe1e111111•••1•{rlfl•• 11•♦x♦•1.1.11•e•wxllxlx11e 1•xx•. ...11f•xlx. •••1♦1{•{{•{••e•♦1••{♦••1••♦• 1•xx1.1••1111!•1•x1.1111••11!•• •x•1l1.11xIx. •1•.•11••1.11.1•!••e1••1•!♦ r11•Iellxxlx11111x1.1♦11•f.1.11 ♦x1♦IxO111x♦x•. ♦1.11•••Ix1•x1•!•x11♦!1•• I••'xe11x111.111.11°111x1°1'1 1%1{1111••°1!'!•e11x°x•1� 1•f1.11-X%°•1°1.1.1°�e'i 1• 1.•111'•'If 1.1'•1{1•f11e1111'1'•111.1{{{{1{{� ♦x•.11•I.Ir11.Oxx{.•!Ie•If 11!•♦ ••1..11x11.111..• •11111.•{.•...•.1•!1• 111♦Ix•Ilx.e.e•Ixx1•{• r{••!•e.e' •1.•x111x1•.x•.1.!• ,e♦xe♦.{•1{.♦♦x•Ixf• 1•••1.111•.11.11.1.•1!••x!1••.• 1.11.11•x•!1•♦1e•11• .•♦lx1111x1.11x11�• 11••x.•.1.♦x.•11111.x.1f••••x♦• xx.e11.111111eexll•1 •.•Ixxllxlllfl!{ •••x••Ir.1♦.IIr•.x.r.♦1!♦1•♦x!• Ixxx1.111.1!♦..Ix•Ie• .1••IIe1111!•x• 1•e11♦1•11111•IxOxx1••11.1•xlx. 11.11♦11x111!•1.111.:• •111..1.•♦•x.♦ ♦••.11!♦1•♦l11111.111'1111••.1l. ♦••elxx♦1l.xxxl•!1•x1• ♦xxef.••♦xell r11x1 1.•1•x♦x11••1•••1•x♦1...1•. 1!••111••x..xx••Iw1•• l•xx1• ,e l.f lxe•xe.' ♦IIIIe♦.x!•♦1.11•I.xx1.1•x.••1♦ 111!1!•x•!♦xx♦e•llxl• �x•xlxxl!• 1.111 .x••xlxlf°�11{I.x�••lxlx�.1••1 1°1!1•!1 1�•Ix�•1.1 •Ix�1•��1•�!x•�x•!��1x1�°.11 x•�1!e°. .,.♦Ix.11x�xx1�x 1.1x!11♦♦•11.1•!1•x1 xr,11.1!♦♦♦11 Ilxllxl•..111.I.xx•x.x..♦ �••1x• •♦1!•xe•••x1.11lxll♦r1e.111•♦•♦ ••Ixxlrlxl.•r•Ixx1{I. Ir•♦ •11x• 1�1�•�I�Ii.•�!i♦�•ix�l�x�1�1�1�ix�1i Ix�°�•�I�Ii•Ii.I�x�•�� ��i1i x i:O i:i1i ixi•I�Ii i 1•�•��i x1si °:s�:x rPix�xOOPi�•i1x�l�x�x�x�Ox�00xid x x l l x x x•x• •••1•♦I x•x•••1••••x 1.1•• 1111••x.•♦. 1.•11111.1••xx11.lIII.,.e1• Axel♦xlx�1••••Illxxx�Ix•�x.1.x1•Ix11�Ixx11�111111x{xlxlx�xlxxxl xx•'ilxi ii 11x1°i i.1111.x11111°�I�x.!1°1.11 r�ix�/�1�x�xi i••i i♦xi xxxi•I�xi1i lixi{x�10�xi Ix�x1 ♦Ii i i i i Oi i Ixi i ii!xi♦ix�1i O,�i ix 11�Ie1���•�1��1�.�1�♦�.�Ix•�1�1.•.�1��.1�i Q�r�1e10�1�10. .x11°i i i i i.°Oi Ix�iOxx�Ox�IPi��Oix I�::xi•�x�1�•��11����-�.�:�l�l�x�♦ ♦1111�x�xi 1•'Ix�♦i�°i�Ii�ixi i•x�xxli�xxx�•.•i�:•. I.t:� i••x�x�°� Ix�1�1�•i i e i i i i•x�x�1�°�x�1�x�1�1�°i •1•• •••Ix•111♦xlrllrlex!♦ •.1•• .Ixlxllx.xx.l.I.Ixx• r1x•1' i1111.1•Ilxxlllxlxr i Ix�'�41 01�°�♦i lxJ�x�0i1�xO�x�•�x�x�°�x •{11• 1.!!1.1••1x11!•1• ..11. .1.1111!!!••11!.. 1.1x1 .1.•x1.1.11••.Ix 10:DOI •ix�•�:xexi♦I�x�1�1�ix�xil 4x01 11� .x�°i i.°exi i i!•�x�i°� rx�l�I�x�♦� i i Ix�x�1�.�1�1�.�xQ•x ••.•• •Ix1.1..e1 11111!•111 11.1♦1x1•!•x♦I!•�• 1••° "•761111.1 i .♦.1.. jn 1.•1. • 1 x1111 •♦•1 � � � •I�i1ix�1: rte°.1x1 1111.1l��1•! xx• /:i i .x� a ei'i ex♦i•�x�x,x11 r , o • ••1•H♦•In.•1 • 1 ,1 �1•�•1.1111�1��,1�1�.11 • •O !• 1�•.vi r1�1�1�x Imo•�� o� 10 'e • 1 j 1 A Cllp T Memorandum Est. , _ 1836 To: Travis Miller, Community Development Director From: Jackie Dearborn, Civil Engineer �9 I n w p CC: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer �2 Date: May 5, 2008 Subject: Drive-Through—Executive Summary The City of Yorkville, on April 10, 2008 passed Ordinance 2008-24 amending Zoning Ordinance 10-7A-1 and 10-7A-2. Drive-through facilities are special uses for the Office(0)Zoning District, also allowable as special uses in the B-1, B-2, B-3 and B-4 districts. There are unique concerns and issues that surround drive-through facilities that may require the development of supplemental standards or amendments to existing zoning ordinances. Sufficient stacking space, efficient internal circulation, adequate parking and site access are important issues to consider when designing a drive-through facility. In many cities, a drive-through is considered a special use with its own section of code. Some towns have adopted supplemental standards especially for drive-through facilities.Existing codes can be adapted to cover this special use or regulations can be integrated into sections of the existing code. Stacking spaces,for example, can be added to the zoning code for parking requirements. Lighting and menu boards may already be addressed in existing regulations. There are several guidelines that should be used for the development and review of site plan applications for drive-through facilities to provide safe,functional and attractive drive-through facilities. The following items present special challenges: • Access Connections • Stacking Lanes • Auto/Pedestrian Circulation • Loading/Parking • Grading/Drainage • Signs/Lighting • Architecture • Setbacks/Landscaping The attached table outlines these issues and concerns. This information was gathered from several sources including zoning standards that are in place at other municipalities. Requirements for spacing access onto public roads, promoting shared access and limiting access width can add to the safety of drive-through facilities. Internal circulation is complicated by the combination of stacking lanes,parking,pedestrians and delivery trucks. When not adequately designed on-site,these factors can cause problems on the public street. Signing, lighting and landscape issues should be addressed so that the building and site fit within the context of the neighborhood and the city to achieve the overall objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Drive4hrough Facilities: Any facility which by design, physical facilities, service or packaging procedures encourages or permits customers to receive service or obtain goods while remaining in their motor vehicles. This shall not include the selling of fuel at a gasoline filling station or the accessory functions of a carwash facility such as vacuum cleaning stations. Access: A way or means of approach to provide vehicular or pedestrian entrance or exit to a property. Spacing Width Posted Speed LimWAccess Spacing * not too close * well-defined 30 MPH 140 FT * cross access easements * not exceed 25' 30 MPH 210 FT * restrictions: right-in * minimize 40 MPH 280 FT or right-outimedfan 50 MPH 350 FT * common drives and curb cuts * not near major intersections where it would create carbon monoxide "hot spots" * min. 100' from any intersection Stacking Lanes: An area of stacking spaces and driving lane provided for vehicles waiting for drive-through service that is physically separated from other traffic and pedestrian circulation on the site. Number of Spaces size Delineated Location * minimum 8 (before order board) * min 20' length * striping * 60' from public street intersection 4 between order board and window * 10' straight, 12' curves * curbing measured from property line to beginning of entrance If 2 windows, split 4 spaces * 12' curves, 11' straight * landscaping not to impede in/out of parking spaces 1 space after last window * 10 Fr x 20 FT * alternate paving materials * separate drive from circulation * 1 bypass lane * 10' wide * raised medians * not to impede pedestrian movement * "bail our capability * 12' wide (one lane), 10' - (two) * physical and visual separtation * not to interfere with loading/trash * At least 6 per lane * approx. 114 feet * emergency by-pass or exit * no exit into public R.O.W. * Auto car wash: 10 enter, 2 exit * min. 8' x 18' * 6" high poured4n-place conk curb * 40' from residential Bank: 6 per teller * 8 feet by 20 feet * can't double as circulation driveway * independent access to street Coffees: 4 per window * min. 80 feet in length * a space at the window/menu board qualifies Dry Cleaner. 3 per window * min. 180 feet to each window * min 25' from drives entering a street Pharmacy: * no more than one lane per facility Restaurant: 12 total, min 5 between order and pick up Self-serve car wash: 3 entering, 2 exiting Service Station: 2 stacking, plus one at gas pump Other. Spar window * 13 per 1000 SF of gross floor area * 7 per serving window * min 5 between order and pick up * max reduction for non-conforming: 2/Wndow or 25% of total reqd minus number not currently provided due to nonconforming (Texas) Internal Circulation: Internal circulation of both auto and pedestrians Entrance/Exit Access Design • signs to Indicate direction * auto * two-way alsies • textured pavement * pedestrian clearly identified * speed of 10 mph • fencing * easements * integrate with stacking lanes • exit/no entrance * service drive or corridor * pedestrian walkways • stop signs if necessary Parking Spaces /Loading; Mechanicai/Deliveries/Loading Required # of spaces • semi-trucks * 10% reduction for shared service drives • location * 20% if peak times are not simultaneous • screened * shared by mutual agreement w/owners * one per 100 SF of floor area/min. 4 * stacking spaces don't count * comply with zoning laws Grading/Drainage Best Management Practices (BMP): For the purposes of storm-water management structural or nonstructural and managerial techniques that are recognized to be the most effective and practical means to prevent or reduce non-point source pollutants from entering receiving waters. Grade Drainage: • maximum of 1% for first 30' * Subdivision Rules • avoid abrupt grade changes * Separate for stacking lane w/curb • less than 4% grade change between sidewalk and adjacent uses Signs: Define and cross reference existing standards. Menu Boards/intercom Type # Height size Hours • meet screening standards * menu board max 6 feet max 30 SF * dosed 10pm-6am if withing 300' from residential • 100' from residential property line * freestanding/2-sided max 1 max 18 inches max 16 SF/per aide * restricted to 7am-10pm next to residential • shielded from street and residences * window max 25% of total window • less than 75 dBA measure 6' away * wall 1 max 9 SF • amplified PA prohibited next to res. * menu board 2 25 SF • prevent radiation of noise * freestanding or wall 2 45 SF • not be heard on residential property * menu boards 2 max 8' from grade 36 SF/32 SF If 2 boards • no attached product advertising * smaller second board max 4 feet max 6 SF Lighting: Reference existing ordinances. Type Amount Direction/Shielding • shoe box type * < 20 FT in height * with Interior shields • decorative in nature * < 12 FT for sidewalks * total cutoff of all light at 90 degrees from vertical • consistent with architectural theme * 8 fc directly below at grade * only visible from below • Flood and area lighting unacceptable * 40OW per drive-through * zero at tot line • Weil-pack with prismatic lens * reflectors of proper distribution for max efficiency wall-pack cutoff 70 degrees from vertical Architecture: Color and Materials Local Architecture Compatible • harmonious/compatible s fagade • windows at entry for visibility to street s roof pitch • textures of wall and roof • style • "franchise architecture" discouraged • mass, proportion and scale Setbacks/Landscaping: Residential setback Landscaping Buffer Zones Size • min. 20 feet • properly maintained • public frontage 15 feet • solid 6' high masonry sound wall at • year-round landscape • sides & rear 20 feet residential property boundary • screening (abutting residential) • open areas landscaped • T wide curbed Island between parking and "ball out" • maintain sight lines from stacking lanes to pod walkways Layout: Layout: Lot Area: Lot Frontage: Lot Depth: • Parallel or perpendicular to street • 50,000 SF • 250 FT 200 FT • maintain street line through walls, • fences or other elements when min • at least one acre in size • sidewalks on all setback can't be met • min.0.50 acre within existing • min setback 40 FT from residential shopping center or urban area Traffic Study: • See Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District Drive-Through Facilities Review Standards: Part Two) • Additional studies may be required such as Air Quality Study or Noise Impact Study 4 DRIVE-THROUGH DEFINITIONS: Access: A way or means of approach to provide vehicular or pedestrian entrance or exit to a property. Access Connection: Any driveway, street, curb cut, turnout or other means of providing for the movement of vehicles to or from the public/private roadway network. Best Management Practices (BMP): For the purposes of storm-water management structural or nonstructural and managerial techniques that are recognized to be the most effective and practical means to prevent or reduce non-point source pollutants from entering receiving waters. Cross Access: A service drive providing vehicular access between two or more contiguous sites so the driver need not enter the public street system. Directional Median Opening: An opening in a restrictive median, which provides for the specific movements and physically restricts other movements. Directional median opening for two opposing left or "U-turn" movements along a road segment are considered one directional median opening. Drive-In Service Restaurant: An establishment principally for the sale and consumption of food where food service is provided to customers in motor vehicles for consumption on the premises. Drive-Through Facility: Any facility which by design, physical facilities, service or packaging procedures encourages or permits customers to receive service or obtain goods while remaining in their motor vehicles. This shall not include the selling of fuel at a gasoline filling station or the accessory functions of a carwash facility such as vacuum cleaning stations. Drive Through Service Restaurant: An establishment principally for the sale and consumption of food which has direct window service allowing customers in motor vehicles to pick up food for off-premise consumption. Driveway/ Curb Cut Spacing: The distance between connections, measured from the closet edge of pavement of the driveway or curb cut to the next closest edge of the pavement along the public/private roadway. Fast Food Restaurant: Any restaurant serving the majority of its food in disposable containers, packages, or other similar wrapping, for consumption on or off the premises. Joint Access (or Shared Access): A driveway connecting two or more contiguous sites to the public/private street systems. Leveling Area: A level area (thirty (30) feet in depth at -1% grade) at the intersection of the access connection and the public way. Lot, Corner: Any lot having at least two (2) contiguous sides abutting upon one or more streets, provided the interior angle at the intersection of such two sides is less than one hundred thirty-five (135) degrees. Restrictive Median: A physical barrier in the roadway that separates traffic traveling in opposite directions, such as a concrete barrier or landscaped island. Stacking Lane: An area of stacking spaces and driving lane provided for vehicles waiting for drive—through service that is physically separated from other traffic and pedestrian circulation on the site. Stacking Space: An area within a stacking lane for vehicles waiting to order and/or finish a drive — through transaction. crr o United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road W. _ 1636 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 ? Fax: 630-553-7575 CLE wv PC # APPLICATION & PETITION ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST Development Name: AARTLA "DCEtJ�U-:R Date of Submission: S' 022� oS Requesting: [] Annexation [] Zoning [] Planned Unit Development Special Use: i ZWE MLk L&69 1 . Name of Pet � Petitioner(s): tClAARD MARJ:rP ASSoCiATes; OItG . Address: 65q ttCARTCAWD DRWE Phone Number: 63o-•.ss3 -3322 Fax Number: J30 - S:53 -,S736 Email Address: G Fmrarke� (r� ltlari�rlrx -t ors Relationship of Petitioner(s) to subject property: [] Owner X Developer [] Contract Purchaser 2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from #1 : If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: OAK BROQK RAtUic TQWT #3191 ,II&iE;:J NARY , RteriARt> MAs"a iys9oCiAr65 ' lAk . 3. a). (i). Street address and physical location of subject property: 722? L V°rCRAw; 7Ai&&jAY (ii). Zoning of surrounding parcels: North: B3 POD South: B3 FUD East: T%3 ?LAP West: 'R3 RAD b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit "A". c). Total Acreage: & I V ACres d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of property: 02 2,? - 253 - OIL L e). Current Zoning Classification: T-3 P( XD f). Zoning Classification Requested: C0ntJiT10 !JAa L(je 1oP_ 7?RwE TNQtt g). Is this property within City limits? _)L Yes No, requesting annexation Page 1 of S United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11128/06 4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners and landowners within 500' entitled to notice of petition under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: Attach a separate list and label as Exhibit "B". 5. List all governmental entities or agencies required to receive notice notice under Illinois law: faRKUlti£ vgp?MOO ' TV 5.,'H X, USTAiGt #fj j3 p 1.J15L KEIJb4tL FIRS• Dcr4RTMCMr, QKUrLLE BRIM. SANi-VARd? J)iSTQIC.r 6. List the Illinois Business Tax Number (IBT#) for the State of Illinois and names of businesses located on subject property to be annexed: 7. Does a flood plain exist on the subject property? NO 8. Do Electors reside on the subject property? N 0 If so, they must execute this petition to annex. (Electors as defined by Illinois Law is a resident of the parcel who is a registered voter. Legal owners of the annexing parcel must sign the petition regardless of place of residence or legal voting status.) 9. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: CIu •tort ('' cker GSLt x/caRTLkn,� 51a\vE 630-5 53 322 634 - S53 - ,5 7% C4Md1%iter &. M4Iker@1Ac, CoJn Attorney: Name: G C JMtkK - Man! Address: 226 S% BRttIG9 A '6MVJLLE Phone Numbenk. 0 .653- 3622 Fax Number: d �o S5.'3 ISB Email Address: A r r' !gjA WL m n5or a 1"54ma. i I , Corn Engineer: Name: Polk AND ASSOC1ATcs , lwk, Address: 1887 /-lloa GRove G4N6 NAPCQVILLi; X Phone Number: eJo - 3SS- 3232 Fax Number: 630. 30- 326 "7' Email Address: A Land Planner: Name: �iG4►ARD MAit ! ssx5c4A*6S . 1w.- Address: CnSq /76ARTLAM D VIZWE , �RiQVILLC Phone Number. 630 --%560 3322 Fax Number: Gas ••SS.3 -S'73d Email Address: Cr1prr?! ® Nlai tC'r►%iG , th Page 2 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 Helen Harris Robert & Nanette Michalec Anthony and Emily Weeks 557 Heartland Drive 589 Heartland Drive 605 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Theresa Juodis Todd & Dawn Fitzgerald Robbin Amfelt 627 Heartland Drive 649 Heartland Drive 661 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Richard & Maria Schroeder Heartland Residential Community Stephen Wessel 683 Heartland Drive 927 Heartland Drive 920 Chandler Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Geneva, IL 60134 Greg Millen Rafael & Rocio Perez Christina Bourque 220 Bridge Street South 953 Heartland Drive 965 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Leopoldo Barajas John & Deborah Soles George and Jeanne Deichmueller 977 Heartland Drive 1272 Mistwood Court 1258 Mistwood Court Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Charles Metzgar Richard & Kelly Mahe Kendall Investment Corp 1246 Mistwood Court 1224 Mistwood Court 2901 Butterfield Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Patrick Williams Brian & Margaret Flynn Mark & Rita Meinert 1247 Mistwood Court 1235 Mistwood Court 1223 Mistwood Court Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Gary & Belinda Szurkowski James & Tamara Burdzinski Gordon & Lynne Stevens 1211 Mistwood Court 1202 Mistwood Court 926 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Hamdey & Diana Alley Buckingham Builders LLC Nicholas Diaz 938 Heartland Drive 123 Ambassador Drive #151 1294 Mistwood Court Yorkville, 11 60560 Naperville, IL 60540 Yorkville, IL 60560 Franklin & Debra Kryszewski Douglas Gordon & Krisina Hesbol David & Georgeann Wrobble 1283 Mistwood Court 676 Heartland Drive 698 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Jeffery & Peggy Berta McCue Builders, Inc. Raymond J. Waclaw 712 Heartland Drive 41 Royal Oak Drive West 756 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Bristol, IL 60512 Yorkville, IL 60560 Joseph E Kinney Anthony & Ann Marie Mormino Brian & Christine Kaitare 778 Heartland Drive 792 Heartland Drive 806 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Timothy & Mary Ann Schaper Thomas & Michele Pierce David Chittended 828 Heartland Drive 842 Heartland Drive 864 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Richard & Linda Mietz William & Tina Fabricino Oak Brook Bank 886 Heartland Drive 904 Heartland Drive Richard Marker Associates, Inc Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 654 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Scott & Lisa Sleezer Allen & Pamela Stanislaus Peter & Jennifer Huinker 632 Heartland Drive 608 Heartland Drive 598 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Donald & Melissa Smith Hyung in & Kim Jong Sun Song John & Lynne Bivens 1045 Stillwater Court 1067 Stillwater Court 1089 Stillwater Court Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Charles & Lisa McGavern James & Michelle Nuzzo Nicholas & Vicki Stull 1092 Stillwater Court 1078 Stillwater Court 1056 Stillwater Court Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Alexander & Shawn MacPherson Richard & Cheryl Murray David & Kristine Andres 1034 Stillwater Court 865 Homestead Drive 887 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Rosemarie Gerady David & Annette Floeckher Keith & Deanna Cross 874 Haley Court 822 Haley Court 831 Haley Court Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Raymond & Susan Ziegler James & Julie Robbins Jeffrey & Suzanne Cramer 855 Haley Court 875 Haley Court 901 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 John & Nancy Murphy Eric & Sherri Dhuse Lorenzo & Marcella Perez 923 Homestead Drive 935 Homestead Drive 947 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Christopher & Julie Krumme Shawn & Erica Rathje Christina Smoczynski 959 Homestead Drive 961 Homestead Drive 973 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Rob Knierim Haohua & Gao Zheng Yang Robert & Kathleen Wall 985 Homestead Drive 997 Homestead Drive 1001 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 George & Sharon Musko Richard & Kathleen Korinek Steven & June Jaros 966 Homestead Drive 944 Homestead Drive 922 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Shaye & Sunny Mandle Don & Carol Hamman Gerald Brongiel 896 Homestead Drive 13351 B Faxon Road 9120 Route 34 Yorkville, IL 60560 Plano, IL 60545 Yorkville, IL 60560 American Legion Post 489 PNGK Family LTD Partnership Robert & Kimberly Nadr 9054 U.S. Route 34 2956 Beth Lane 1060 McHugh Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Naperville, IL 60564 Yorkville, IL 60560 Marvin Pilmer David & Debbie Coffman Anthony Pignatello 1002 Prarie Street 7315 Hillside West 1107 McHugh Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Crystal Lake, IL 60012 Yorkville, IL 60560 Amanda Melick Edward Mystek 1105 McHugh Road 1101 McHugh Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 8 IN HEARTLAND CENTER RESUPDIVISION OF LOT 3 IN UNIT 1 . BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN , IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST PETITIONER ROUTE Step 1 : Petitioner must submit a completed application, fees* and all pertinent materials to the Deputy Clerk a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. Petitioner is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, etc., to allow timely review by City. *Fees: a. Annexation or Annexation and Rezoning - $250 plus $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres b. Rezoning only - $200 plus $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres c. Special Use - $250 plus $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres d. Engineering Review Fees - 1 .25% of the approved engineer's estimate of cost of all land improvements, to be determined by City Engineer. e. Planned Unit Development fee - $500 f. Engineering Review Deposit - up to 1 acre = $1 ,000; over 1 acre but not over 10 = $2500 over 10 acres, but not over 40 = $5,000 over 40 acres, but not over 100 = $10,000 over 100 acres = $20,000 g. Deposit for Outside Consultants - under 2 acres = $1 ,000 2 to 10 acres = $2,500 over 10 acres = $5,000 Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). Should Owner/Developer not pay these fees directly, they will be responsible for reimbursing the United City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs. Note: You must present your plan at each of the meetings below as indicated. Step 2: Plan Council: The Plan Council meets the 2ntl and a Thursday of the month at 9:30 a.m. in the City Administration Office. Upon recommendation by the Plan Council, you will move forward to the Plan Commission Meeting. Attendees to this meeting include: City Administrator, Community Development Director, Sanitary District Director, City Engineer, Building Department Official, Emergency Medical Rep, Public Works Director, Director of Parks and Recreation, Fire Department Rep, and Police Chief. Step 3: Park Board Planning Meeting: The Park Board makes recommendations on any Park Sites included in residential developments. The Park Board Planning Meeting is the fourth Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Riverfront Building, 301 E. Hydraulic Street. Step 4: Plan Commission: The Plan Commission meets the second Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Plan Commission will make a recommendation for the City Council's consideration. The Plan Commission consists of 10 members appointed by the Mayor, the City Attorney and City Land Planner. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Annexation Agreement and/or Rezoning request or Special Use request. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record and certified mail by the Petitioner to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject property no less than fifteen days and no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing date. A certified affidavit must be filed by the petitioner with the City Clerk's office containing the names, addresses and permanent parcel numbers of all parties that were notified. Page 4 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 Step 5 - only required for annexation agreements or PUD agreements: City Council public hearing: The City Council meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Annexation Agreement and/or Planned Unit Development Agreement. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record. A certified mailing to surrounding landowners is not required for this public hearing. Any annexation agreement, PUD agreement or development agreement must be signed by the Petitioner prior to being voted on by the City Council. Step 6: Economic Development Committee and Committee of the Whole: The Economic Development Committee and Committee of the Whole meets the third Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Committee of the Whole where no formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings. Step 7: City Council: The City Council meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. This is where all City Council voting takes place. Agreement: I understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred Administrative and Planning Consultant Fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return this original (retaining a copy for your records) to the Deputy Clerk, United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. Date: Signature of Petitioner Page 5 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 10. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies. b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to page 4 of this application to "Petitioner Route, Step 1 , Fees" and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount). c. Concept or Preliminary Site Plan: 40 sets folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope. d. One CD containing one electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with exhibits) and site plan. In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is contiguous to the United City of Yorkville. Date: 6- a2 - oy Petitioner gnature: ( lega roperty owners signatures must appear on this application.) G Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Ll�� , 200 U . No a Seal OFFICIAL SEAL THI PPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. TAMI C TEACHMAN NOTARY PUBLIC • STATE OF ILLINOIS MY COMMISSION E) PIRES:031tU10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -t Page 3 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUDZoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 Step 5 - only required for annexation agreements or PUD agreements: City Council public hearing: The City Council meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Annexation Agreement and/or Planned Unit Development Agreement. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record . A certified mailing to surrounding landowners is not required for this public hearing. Any annexation agreement, PUD agreement or development agreement must be signed by the Petitioner prior to being voted on by the City Council. Step 6: Economic Development Committee and Committee of the Whole: The Economic Development Committee and Committee of the Whole meets the third Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Committee of the Whole where no formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings. Step 7: City Council: The City Council meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p. m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. This is where all City Council voting takes place. Agreement: I understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred Administrative and Planning Consultant Fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return this original (retaining a copy for your records) to th eputy Clerk, United Cit of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. Date: 5 -02 Cy � Signature of Petitioner Page 5 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 eoe%�,,p C I T y Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 2 0 J o ti+ Legal ■ �� � sin EST. �. 1836 Finance El ■ -� — Tracking Number City Administrator ❑ z. a0 Consultant 11 Fl 2008-19 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Star European Imports – Annexation and PUD Zoning Meeting and Date: EDC / October 7, 2008 Synopsis: Request for annexation and PUD zoning with a Concept PUD Plan Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: n/a Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: majority Council Action Requested: Approval of Annexation and Concept PUD Submitted by: Travis Miller Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See staff attached report D c,T, Memorandum 2 t o To: EDC a J�' -,A From: Travis Miller/Stephanie Boettcher EST. 1 1836 CC: Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk (for distribution) " — Date: September 22, 2008 O ®' ei Subject: PC 2008-19 Urness Land Company (Star European Imports) - 9 Annexation and PUD Zoning Request Back round The petitioner is requesting annexation and PUD zoning for 2 acres located at 9316 Veterans Parkway (US34). Along with the petition for annexation, the petitioner has submitted Geometric Plan depicting existing and proposed site improvements. Staff has reviewed the Geometric Plan as the Concept PUD per Zoning Ordinance Chapter 13 . The Plan Commission reviewed the annexation and conducted a public hearing regarding the zoning request on September 10, 2008 and made the following actions: Motion to recommend approval of Annexation subject to staff comments 6 ayes; 0 no Motion to recommend PUD Zoning 6 ayes; 0 no Comprehensive Plan Recommendation for Property The 2002 Comprehensive Plan, as well as the pending 2008 updated, recommends Commercial land use for the subject property. The Comprehensive Plan defines Commercial as, "... to promote market-sensitive development of commercial uses within strategically located areas to efficiently, effectively, and conveniently serve the growing local population, while continuing the importance of the United City of Yorkville as a regional center. " Staff Comments and Recommendations: 1 . The petitioner request of Planned Unit Development zoning is appropriate and will allow special provisions beyond the B-3 zoning requirements to be applied to this property. This zoning request should be noted on the Geometric Plan dated August 15, 2008, as opposed to B-3 Service Business District. 2. Staff suggests B-3 Service Business District to be used as guideline for the subject property in regards to zoning requirements. See B-3 Zoning Requirements listed below. Zonine Requirements - B-3 Service Business District Lot Area: Minimum 10,000 sq. ft. Front Yard: Minimum 50 feet Side Yard: Minimum 20 feet Transitional fRear) Yard: Minimum 30 feet Lot Coverage: Maximum 50% Maximum Building Height: Maximum 35 feet or 3.5 stories Parking Lot Setback: 20 feet from property line 1 3. The concept plan dated August 15, 2008 is in compliance with all of the aforementioned requirements, except for the side yard and parking lot setback zoning requirements. These two deficiencies are further addressed below. 4. Parking requirements for motor vehicle sales — 1 space per 600 square feet of floor area. 16.2 spaces are required. Parking requirements for retail stores — 1 space per 300 square feet of floor area. 20 spaces are required. The proposed plan provides for 66 spaces for the dealership, this does not include the amount provided in the sales area, and 21 spaces for the retail building. 5. Given the abundance of parking, staff recommends modifying the 14 spaces (@9'=126') along the eastern part of the property to be 6 parallel spaces (@20'=120') and eliminate the 17 spaces along the western part of the property in order to provide 16' side yard along the eastern and 20' side yard along the western property lines. 41 parking spaces are still provided for the dealership exceeding the parking requirements. Note: the staff recommendation still leaves the eastern setback is 4' deficient of the 20' requirement. Based on the Plan Council discussion, the petitioner expressed concern for the spaces along the eastern property line in order to be convenient for dealership customers — staff recommends allowing this deficiency an incorporating into a provision of the Annexation/PUD Agreement. 6. On the geometric plan, the parking setback requirement is not met given the proposed land dedication along US 34. Staff recommends a waiver of this requirement based on at least 10' will remain between future pavement edge/curb and parking and due to this area being a display area for the dealership and not a typical parking lot. 7. The geometric plan states the site has lot coverage of 67.75% above the maximum 50%. However, lot coverage applies to buildings and structures, so lot coverage for the property is actually less than the requirement and is in compliance. The concept plan needs to be corrected to reflect this. 8. 1 free standing permanent sign with a maximum of 32 square feet in area and 8 feet in height would be permitted on the subject property. The current site plan identifies only 1 sign location, in conformance with this requirement. Staff recommends the petitioner to provide additional sign specifics in regards to appearance and size of the sign prior to annexation agreement approval. 9. Staff suggests the petitioner provide additional lighting specifications prior to annexation agreement approval. The use of wall packs on buildings should be minimized and lighting should follow the "dark sky" concept promoted by the City of Yorkville. 10. Given the amount of impervious surface, staff supports the use of paver brick on a portion of the property as it allows for better groundwater infiltration than other paving materials. Since, the plan provides square footage of impervious versus pervious surface onsite; staff 2 suggests the petitioner provide additional specifications in regards to groundwater infiltration for pervious and impervious surfaces. 11 . Any redevelopment, improvements, or additions added to the subject property should follow the United City of Yorkville Design Guidelines, specifically Principles 4 — 5 and 8 — 10, see attached. The Annexation Agreement should include a provision(s) addressing these guidelines. 12. Per the City's Appearance Code, the trash receptacle enclosure shall be made of material compatible to the material used in the existing principal structure. 13 . The subject property shall comply with the requirements outlined in the City's Landscape Ordinance. However, Staff recognizes that given the use of the property and the current concept plan, the all of the requirements outlined in the City's Landscape Ordinance may not be met. Specific areas with potential deficiencies meeting the Landscape Ordinance requirements include parkway landscaping, interior parking lot landscaping, perimeter parking lot landscaping, and lot landscaping. Given this, Staff is amendable to modifications to the Landscape Ordinance requirements, as long as the quantity of landscape material is not reduced on site. Staff suggests that the petitioner submit a landscape plan prior to annexation agreement approval in order to specifically address these deficiencies and modifications in a provision(s) of the Annexation Agreement. 14. Staff recommends a preliminary grading plan accompany the Geometric Plan. A grading plan is required to determine existing drainage patterns and evaluate the proposed detention area. The outfall of the proposed detention basin and the offsite drainage should be included. 15. Utilities: a. Sanitary sewer connection to the Heartland Business Center may be the only viable alternative for sanitary service to the property. An 8" sanitary sewer exists with invert elevations of 635.5 at McHugh/Rt.34 and 633.9 at McHugh/Farmstead. This alignment would require offsite easements across adjacent properties, but also possible cost participation by those adjacent property owners. A very shallow 8" sanitary sewer with an invert elevation of 636.5 exists on the Shops at Veterans Parkway property, about 110 feet west of the subject property. b. An existing 8" watermain is located near the NW corner of the site. This watermain needs to be extended across the property's Rt.34 frontage. c. The piping within the septic field should be filled with solid materials such as sand, gravel or concrete to prevent collapse from driving over. 16. The cross access easements should each include a dimension for the width (25'). A note indicating that the cross access easement also allows the adjacent properties access across the property should be included on the Geometric Plan as well. 3 Annexation Agreement The proposed Draft Annexation Agreement is attached for your reference and review. A public hearing regarding the agreement has been scheduled for October 28, 2008. Staff prepared the attached draft and the petitioner is currently reviewing the agreement. Staff will provide a report prior to the public hearing regarding any modifications from this version. 4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING N for -_ THE WESTERLY 334 FEET. AS MEASURED ALONG LEE SOVM PART OF THE REM HW OF SECTION 26 TOWNSHIP HE E ---- NORTH. PENCE 2 FAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL NORMAL,EDE THEN AT A POINT ON For SOUTH p OF THE SONHF/ST 3J ,I ----- __ DEGREES OF OR SECTION, 40 DUNS EAST OF THE SOUDM'EST CORNER OF NEDWSONHFIST PLANNED! THENCE NORTH 11 DECREES 30 MNMES 00 ------ SECONDS FAST 3482 ATTEND TO AN ANGLE IN THE CENTER LINE OF OSWEGO ROM: THENCE NORTH 53 DEGREES 35 6039 S OD O A POI T HONG THE ----- ___ CENTER LINE F, END UM N ROM IIIS< FEET TO A ROCKY }HENCE OJ DEGREES R 3D MINUTES R SEE 34 F R T 606.9 POINT OF BE I POIM 310 FEET --- ___ SOVIHEGO OF, MINUTESO O SEC THE IAA DESCRIBE° IIXE E#ENFTE 1DE ENDED LME OF 11.5. ROME 31 FOR THE 0.01 OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTH ---___ 01 UEGREA 30 MINUTES OG OF RIGS OF ALONG A LINE RDEIAN DOCUMENT ENTEO i0 IS DNE 2A2. A DISTANCE OF 400.01 FEEL TO ME NORTHERLY LINE ----- Y LI REA DDED AE F 2340 NUMBER 4002-OT ON AND 2002-20014: THENCE SOUTH BE DEGREES 26TENT---____ DISTANCE LL ]J BC NEE TO A PAIN} ON A THE CESIS 336W G S GOEMIN OF o RgRE ]< PER PER W RIGHT OF WAY PLANS _{MFAS NCNINE SW111ERLY XE C, M39) AGO PARALLEL REM T WRH ONE JA? AS AFORESAID; THENCE SOUTH TH 07 DEGREES ]O MINUTES S n ES 66 SEC NORTHERLY L VREO ALONG V.S. DOME SOUIFULV MEET 34 F ALONG SAID PARNIEL FINE, A DAPHNE W 90001 FELT TO A NNE DWWN SECONDS R PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER ENE OF LOT U.B. /�PAIA'I SI " " ROME F FROM TECTIETONT TH-OEEECINN NC' THENCE NORTH 83 DEGREES 28 M MINUTES 00 SECONDS BEST ALONG ONE PARLLLEL LINE 334,00 FEEE TO THE S L 0 SIR FULL fiY°DEED RFCORCFD ON AREEE°Fi0 _ J p6s Nrvc x THE Towrvw�i nl-eRlsrol_xcrvwu couxn FPoE OF pgKMEN! PACE 95 WLMM ------------ 30 0 30 60 90 JO $jhFE—��roMER LINE of us RpvrE 39-. GAY'po°y _.. $ Scale 1 " = 30' FINED rovrxmLV LINE of US flWiE 31 563 2846"E 4Mf-JVO2°-ED-2-GEO B°EQ15� POUND IROry /6$ 66 ' k 20On=2O0q - /'EDGE OF PAVEMENT 1 026 N �,PROPO6E0 20 1-9 _ ` - I -------- -- — COxCREIE W DEDICATION a a R �- P .00' p�p9Ey 6 -LIGHT 4 - MIC o = m z .BZ �_ m e"Y° / Oe EE z I.DO N PRESS o -" :tae DrsP1Ar AQEA � .0 —_ - - _ — _ s SI — — SITE DETECT IAMK PROPO EO SIGNS G FLYNN M 9GN MAV M FCM 6 � N9PL(Y AAFA °F 32 SF CDRO I ° 1 QoD PROPTO l OROBS ACCESS GSgT (MFSITF iRNgc uLOWE° TO CEO °� Ia 8W LOAN zoN Y • TOLD BAR URN{, N+EA (pevE�) ]2. 1 n q Am 24W 2^ �I rt PROPOSED AOOmWI : _ 2=W 'I 2 u IS ,s p _ G r _ 2,960 zgll 66,91' ° °0 J It ASPHALT PAVEMEM ,a°O IS Pro NET S T? � �'� '.m 'V 6830 ® e G 18 0 1 00 - Co.� "TIRE ONE eeA ¢•Y h STORY � 2 9.32' I meb3NG n� o b YP ®o - 67.45 AT Oa _ NA 12 9.0 -10 .0 DUMPSHER NCLOSJRE b 14 L60 PROFESSOR 5' SIOEWALD O ONB ACS I50° °p y w PROPOS O 5' LAN •GAFF g FollxD d° PR T/on OVNrAR WMPSIER - xO$} IRON NIPE 'W ENCLOSURE PAVEMENT o'ZJ k Od! E. i/fDl 11 FOUND _ CURRENT ZONING = B-3 Kendall County o QN SPA, PROPOSED DETENTION I5626M' PROPOSED ZONING = Planned Unit Development Zoning (Yorkville) ON LINE ETENTION eooir pvsTERlr DF o,� 0 12 Se. REA aGEi EXISTING LOT AREA = 2.32ac (101,121.66sf ) y3 AREA TO BE VACATED PER R.O.W. DEDICATION = 0.98 AS (4,276.]8 Bt) Q\) u�CELI� ^ PROpO5E0 6' N1CH SMIO SCREEN PROPOSED LOT AREA = 2.22 AS (96,844.88 At) R FEH E IS 1.4' ry°flEm EASEMENT n FENCE ALONG SWIH PROPERTY LINE IXISRNG DEALERSHIP SQUARE FOOTAGE ],9]9.18 IN R FENCE IS 7.2' S. RONN PIPE 1 OH= Pal FENCE I5 O 10' S /A 6 p ' GET PROPOSED ADD19TON SQUARE FOOTAGE 2,96058 R . k o.93' W (VZ` SS.O5`I LT. y G9'p l TOTAL DEALERSHIP SQUARE FOOTAGE 10,939.18 ME IF LS' E N83'29 O6D"YJ SHED C,O POINT OF AT BEGINNING PROPOSED RETAIL SQUARE FOOTAGE 6,000.00 SIR PENCE Is wy DHF ZONING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED PROPOSED G a, - LOT AREA 10,000 SF (MIN) 96,844.88 Of m p, MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35 35(MAX) oOLOA FRONT YMET O SETBACK CO. 58.39' ?O OP OSf`AEb ALIJC UM 6ARry REAR YARD SETBACK 30' ERAS P� �6. PARKING SETBACK 20' 15' (FAS7) Ph \5" F''" PRIM 'P SIDE YARD SMACK 20' 41.60' LOT COVERAGE 50% (MAX) 17A% OUTDOOR PAVER 1 SPACE/60osF DISPLAY AREA DEALERSHIP PARKING 19.2 SPACES 41 SPACES Sr RETAIL PARKING 1 SPACE/300SF 20 SPACES 0 1 NO SPACED EY P01 o REVISIONS NoM FxcEMFM PREPARED By No DATE DESCRIPTOR NO. EAT DESCRIPTION STAR EUROPEAN IMPORTS PREPARED FOR w KOZIOL ENGINEERING SERVICES C STAR EUROPEAN IMPORTS.. NC` PrOless ona En9meer: 0 09 10 08 CONCEPT PLAN 9316 ROUTE 34 1709 ALLEN ASE, roreumLlE nurvols 5o1TnlWENT XEN DF LISLE R. 60532 GEOMETRIC PLAN SOOT ZFAST O P TER OF (630)553-fi 555 EC 83%]35 8686 CIVIL/ CONSULTING ENGINEERS DSGN. BY: FILE NAME: 08145 SHEET No DEN. BY SCALE: 1"=30' 1 or 1 ii•• r.• e•••••••o•• ♦•♦ ••1••• ••• ••••....••.•A♦•p�•r •1•• ♦• ♦♦•• •• X. �•••••1••••••••v. •.••♦•♦ i• iQ•i�ii•i:°:���•,�e.•• ••a•• - - •••° • °•e•••°••. ii••°. •••• r••-•i• • •••vii Piii••• e• a `Ir . r • �•ii•Iii••••♦ Pifiif i°iii i••�••i•�•°•°iii . . . .......iiir i°•♦•°i ieiiiii ei r � ••ii•• °'•'�•••° •°••i i•••��••f°�♦a9•i i•i i°•i°•••°•°f°!��• •°%••ai i i i i 1 �•• •0•r°i °••ei i•°i i e°I.s. i o i•i•� '��r.'ii C•YI♦. •e. ;,•e Ji1'•`••i.ie••e•♦••• r1•��••♦ e11••• ••° ••••••••••••o•••i•• °•1••••••11•♦r•••• ��°•1 °��'�1�•°�••1°i•i°����I��Ii.i°•�°I�•��°.�0�1��••�� .e• `����r1�1�111 !°e°i• °•:°i a°i•i°•°i••°°�i°i i i e��i°°i i i°i Oi i i°•a i°i i i i ri°•i°i°•°i•Ii•' :°•�i i°iii♦1•♦ i♦•S•• !pi. •••♦•••••••••••• ••i••••IOr ••••e••e riii•i••••a♦iY• •••e••1 iii♦ :°. ✓•e•••♦e•••o• •e�O••e••••a•••••1•e••e •••e••••••• ••i♦•1f•••• °♦°ii Viii:iiiiiiiiiii•iii a ii eii ii:i o i i e e°°ii•�:• o°i•:°ii:ii ei i°•i♦ •°••f••°.• • •••♦ •e11••1••••••••••••••••••••••♦e 1•••••11 •o••••IO•••••♦e♦♦♦••♦ •♦♦..r •1•••oo•••eoe••••Ie••••s•...... ......••1 •••♦•e♦e••••♦•f♦o••o• .•.�•�1••••••1............ •♦••••• •♦••••�••• •••0.1•••••••••••••r ••• �e��. •i•••� :°�°:i°i i�°e%•°i i°i•°i i•°i•��•i i••i•°�°i•••=°•°�°�i�i•�ei a•.• 'i i•i°i°��i i i i•i°i i°i.°i°°�•i i ' iiii'e•°e °'♦•f• iii•°^' •�•s°•°iii•�♦�ii•i°iiii ••1•s•♦•• ••u ♦f♦•♦!♦f♦•f••• �•�•°•r��ih�° 'i i i i i i i•ae i°•••i�i i� ' • 1 go N. - s MY 0 MM 1 —0,14,14M#S04401111 August 6, 2008 Revised September 15, 2008 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )ss. COUNTY OF KENDALL ) ANNEXATION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AND THE URNESS LAND COMPANY (STAR EUROPEAN IMPORTS, INC.) THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2008 by and between THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, Yorkville, Illinois, a municipal corporation, located in Kendall County, Illinois (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), and URNESS LAND COMPANY, of the County of Kendall, State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as "OWNER/DEVELOPER") of the certain territory hereinafter referred to as "PROPERTY". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, OWNER/DEVELOPER is the owner of real property which is the subject matter of said Agreement comprising approximately 2.3 acres, more or less, and is more particularly described in the attached Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the PROPERTY is located contiguous to the corporate boundaries of the CITY; and is not located within the corporate boundaries of any other municipality; nor is any portion thereof classified as flood plain; and WHEREAS, OWNER/DEVELOPER desires to annex the said real property described into the CITY; its Plan Commission has considered the petition to annex and has held a public hearing as to PUD zoning request and positively recommended annexation and PUD Zoning District classification for the PROPERTY; and WHEREAS, OWNER/DEVELOPER has presented, and the CITY has considered, the proposed commercial uses to be conducted on the PROPERTY as being permitted under its B-3 Service Business District; and WHEREAS, all parties to this Agreement desire to set forth certain terms and conditions 1 upon which the territory heretofore described will be annexed to the CITY in an orderly manner; and WHEREAS, OWNER/DEVELOPER and its representatives have discussed the proposed annexation and have held Public Hearings with the Plan Commission and the City Council, and prior to the execution hereof, notice was duly published and a public hearing was held to consider this Agreement in front of the City Council, as required by the statutes of the State of Illinois in such case made and provided; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the powers granted to the CITY by the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15. 1-1 through 51 . 1-5 (2006), inclusive, relating to Annexation Agreements, the parties hereto wish to enter into a binding agreement with respect to the annexation and zoning of the subject PROPERTY and to provide for various other matters related directly or indirectly to the annexation of the PROPERTY in the future, as authorized by the provisions of said statutes; and WHEREAS, pursuant to due notice and publication in the manner provided by law, the appropriate zoning authorities of the CITY have taken all further action required by the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15. 1 .3 (2006) and the ordinances of the CITY relating to the procedure for the authorization, approval and execution of this Annexation agreement by the CITY. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties agree, under the terms and authority provided in 65 ILCS 5/11- 15. 1-1 through 65 ILCS 5111-15. 1 -5 (2006), as amended, as follows: 1 . ANNEXATION AND ZONING A. The CITY shall adopt an ordinance annexing to the City all of the territory described herein in the attached Exhibit "A'; and as depicted in the Plat of Annexation, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B"; and the City shall adopt an ordinance to zone the real property designated in the attached Exhibit "A" as a Planned Unit Development, allowing for uses permitted within the B-3 Service Business District. B. Said zoning shall allow all of the uses as set forth on for the B-3 Service Business District with the exception those described by Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. C. Said real property shall be used and developed in accordance with 65 ILCS 5/11-15. 1-1 through 65 ILCS 5111-15. 1-5 as generally described and illustrated by the Concept PUD Plan, Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. 2. SITE DEVELOPMENT —2— A. The parties hereto acknowledge that the subject property is planned to be improved with business uses including office, car sales, and car repair. Each of said uses shall be treated as a legal conforming use under the terms of this Agreement. B. SANITARY SEWER: OWNER/DEVELOPER shall connect to City sanitary sewer main, in a manner to be approved by the City Engineer, at normal hook-up fees payable to the United City of Yorkville and to the Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall annex to the Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District and the OWNER/DEVELOPER shall petition to annex to the Yorkville- Bristol Sanitary District in order to hook-up to the sanitary sewer and wastewater plant treatment system prior to Final PUD approval or issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first. C. SEPTIC SYSTEM: OWNER/DEVELOPER shall abandon the use of the existing septic on the PROPERTY at the time the existing residential structure(s) is removed from the property as described in Section Hdi of this Agreement, and upon abandonment shall immediately fill the piping within the septic field with solid materials such as sand, gravel or concrete to prevent collapse from driving over and take such other measures in compliance with the Illinois Public Health Code to provide for the abandonment of the septic system on the PROPERTY. D. MUNICIPAL WATER: OWNER/DEVELOPER shall connect to City water main, in a manner to be approved by the City Engineer, at normal hook-up fees payable to the United City of Yorkville prior to Final PUD approval or issuance of a building permit, whichever occurs first. E. EXISTING WELL: OWNER/DEVELOPER shall abandon the use of the existing well on the PROPERTY at the time the existing residential structure(s) is removed from the property as described in Section H.ii of this Agreement, and upon abandonment shall immediately fill with solid materials such as sand, gravel or concrete and take such other measures in compliance with the Illinois Public Health Code to provide for the abandonment of the well on the PROPERTY. F. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: OWNER/DEVELOPER shall upon construction of any new facilities comply with the City Subdivision Control Ordinance. Onsite and offsite stormwater infrastructure shall be determined during the Preliminary PUD Plan process or non-residential site plan review process, whichever occurs first. In the event the OWNER/DEVELOPER desires to connect with any part of the Reserve at the Fox apartment complex stormwater management system, consent of that property owner would be necessary and would be the responsibility of the OWNER/DEVELOPER to obtain. G. HIGHWAY ACCESS: OWNER/DEVELOPER currently has two (2) existing —3— highway access cuts onto US Route 34. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to be an Agreement to alter those road access points or to eliminate any US Route 34 access points. The OWNER/DEVELOPER shall convey additional US Route 34 right-of-way to the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) at the request of IDOT at no cost to the CITY or IDOT. H. PERMITTED USES ON THE PROPERTY: (i) Permitted uses on the PROPERTY are described by attached Exhibit "C" and include retail, office, automotive sales and repair, and sale of related automobile parts. OWNER/DEVELOPER shall be permitted to undertake and perform any said use related to automobile sales and service business so long as it is compliance with this Agreement, all CITY Codes and Ordinances, Illinois Public Health Code, and any Illinois EPA Regulations with respect to each business. (ii) OWNER/DEVELOPER shall remove the existing residential structures on the PROPERTY within 120 days of the date of this Agreement. In the event the OWNER/DEVELOPER does not implement the Concept PUD Plan for the effected areas immediately following said residential structure removal, the effected area shall be seeded, or otherwise treated, in a manner acceptable and approved by the City Engineer. I. BUILDING AND PARKING LOT SETBACKS: The Building and Parking Lot setbacks shall be established by those depicted on the Concept PUD Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "D". The CITY acknowledges the front yard and east side yard parking lot setbacks depicted on Exhibit "D" are deficient of the current Zoning Ordinance. J. DARK SKY REQUIREMENT: Lighting shall be provided for the PROPERTY in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance 10-11-3.17.7 and as described in attached Exhibit "E" of this agreement. K. AUTOMOBILE SALES AREA: The OWNER/DEVELOPER shall install pervious paver material for the automobile sales area as depicted on the Concept PUD Plan per the specifications described by Exhibit "F" of this Agreement. L. SIGN PROGRAM: The OWNER/DEVELOPER shall re-install existing install any new signage on the PROPERTY to be in compliance with the City Sign Code (Municipal Code Title 8, Chapter 11). M. APPEARANCE CODE: The OWNER/DEVELOPER shall comply with the City Appearance Code (Ordinance 2005-51) for all new structures or remodeled structures on the PROPERTY. —4— N. LANDSCAPING: The OWNER/DEVELOPER shall implement the landscape plan as depicted in attached Exhibit "G" of this Agreement. O. CROSS ACCESS EASEMENTS: The OWNER/DEVELOPER agrees to prepare and record cross access easement areas as depicted on the Concept PUD Plan at the time of Final PUD Plan approval or the issuance of the first building permit on the PROPERTY, whichever occurs first. 3, FEES/CONTRIBUTIONS The CITY agrees that due to the nature of the non-residential use of the PROPERTY, OWNER/DEVELOPER has no obligation to pay City School Transition or Land-Cash School or Park Fees. The PARTIES agree, in the event the OWNER/DEVELOPER requests a Concept PUD Plan amendment including residential uses, any and all current development fees related to residential uses in effect at the time of the amendment request will be required by the OWNER/DEVELOPER. 4, RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS It is specifically understood and agreed that OWNER/DEVELOPER and its successors and assigns shall have the right to sell transfer, mortgage and assign all or any part of the subject property and the improvements thereon to other persons, trusts, partnerships, firms, or corporations, for investment, building, financing, developing and all such purposes, and that said persons, trusts, partnerships, firms, or corporations shall be entitled to the same rights and privileges and shall have the same obligations as OWNER/DEVELOPER under this Agreement and upon such transfer, the obligations pertaining to the property transferred or sold shall be the sole obligations of the transferee, except for any performance bonds or guaranties posted by OWNER/DEVELOPER on any subdivided or unimproved property for which an acceptable substitute performance bond or letter of credit has not been submitted to the CITY. 51 TIME OF THE ESSENCE It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that time is of the essence of this Agreement and that all of the parties will make every reasonable effort, including the calling of special meetings, to expedite the subject matter hereof. It is further understood and agreed by the parties that the successful consummation of this Agreement requires their continued cooperation. 6, COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS The covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to be -5- covenants running with the land during the term of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto, including the CITY, its corporate authorities and their successors in office, and is enforceable by order of the court pursuant to its provisions and the applicable statutes of the State of Illinois. 7. BINDING EFFECT AND TERM This Annexation Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, and their successors and owners of record of land which is the subject of this Agreement, assignee, lessees, and upon any successor municipal authorities of said city, so long as development is commenced within a period of twenty years from the date of execution of this Agreement by the CITY. 8. NOTICE Any notices required hereunder shall be in writing and shall be served upon any other parry in writing and shall be delivered personally or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: If to the CITY: City Clerk 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 With a copy to: Kathleen Field Orr City Attorney 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 To OWNER/DEVELOPER: Urness Land Company 9316 Route 34 Yorkville, IL 60560 With a copy to: Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge St. Yorkville, IL 60560 or to such other addresses as any party way from time to time designate in a written notice to the other parties. 91 ENFORCEABILITY This Agreement shall be enforceable in any court of competent jurisdiction by any of the parties hereto by an appropriate action of law or in equity to secure the performance of the covenants herein contained. —6— In the event any portion of said agreement becomes unenforceable due to any change in Illinois Compiled Statutes or court decisions, said unenforceable portion of this Agreement shall be excised here from and the remaining portions thereof shall remain in full force and effect. 10. ENACTMENT OF ORDINANCES The CITY agrees to adopt any ordinances which are required to give legal effect to the matters contained in this Agreement or to correct any technical defects which may arise after the execution of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of 2008. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE By: Valerie Burd, Mayor Attest: City Clerk —7— OWNER/DEVELOPER: URNESS LAND COMPANY By: Attest: Prepared by and Return to: Law Offices of Daniel J. Kramer 1107A S. Bridge Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 630.553.9500 -8- List of Exhibits A. Legal Description B. Plat of Annexation C. Permitted Uses D. Concept PUD Plan E. Dark Sky Requirements F. Automobile Dealership Display Area Pavement Detail G. Landscape Plan —9— EMMIT "A" Legal Description THE WESTERLY 334 FEET , AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF U . S . ROUTE 34 OF THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 28 , TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 , EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION, 40 LINKS EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 34 . 82 CHAINS TO AN ANGLE IN THE CENTER LINE OF OSWEGO ROAD ; THENCE NORTH 53 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID OSWEGO ROAD 111 . 54 FEET TO A POINT ; THENCE 07 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 608 . 9 FEET TO A POINT 340 FEET SOUTHERLY OF , MEASURED ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE EXTENDED , THE CENTER LINE OF U . S . ROUTE 34 FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING ; THENCE NORTH 07 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS LINE "A" , A DISTANCE OF 400 . 01 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF U . S . ROUTE 34 PER PLAT OF RIGHT OF WAY PLANS RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2002 - 08871 AND 2002 -20014 ; THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE , A DISTANCE OF 334 . 00 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE THAT IS 334 . 00 FEET EASTERLY OF (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF U . S . ROUTE 34 ) AND PARALLEL WITH LINE "A" AS AFORESAID; THENCE SOUTH 07 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE , A DISTANCE OF 400 . 01 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN EASTERLY , PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID U . S . ROUTE 34 , FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING ; THENCE NORTH 83 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 334 . 00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING , IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL , KENDALL COUNTY , ILLINOIS . —10— EXHIBIT `B" Plat of Annexation -11- EXIIIBIT '`C" Urness Land Company Property - B-3 Service Business Permitted Uses This exhibit lists all permitted uses within the B-3 Service Business District as they exist in the current Zoning Ordinance. Uses excluded and not permitted by this Agreement are crossed out as follows: (netjpenniftied use) OFFICE DISTRICT (0) Advertising agency. Barber shop. Beauty shop. Bookkeeping service. Club private rodeef. Coffee shop. College, university or junior college. Commercial school, trade school - offering training in classroom study. Detective agency. Employment office. Engineering office. Government office. Income tax service. Insurance office. Library. Manufacturing agent's office. Medical clinic. Park. Professional offices. Public accountant. Real estate office. Stenographic service. Stock broker. Telegraph office. Ticket office. Title company. Travelagency. Utility office. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-74) SSRecial Uses -9s]-id ...,.ste dispe..al site m.a 1973 56A, 3 29 197.4; ,md. Ord 1995 20 e_ 10 4-� LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-1) All uses permitted in the O district. Antique sales. Bakery - retail. Barbershop. Beauty shop. Bookstore. Cafeteria (diner). Camera shop. Church or other place of worship. Gig eigaret4e and tebaeoe stem Clothes - pressing and repair. Chib pAiza4e :.,a„� Glob private outdoor. Community center. Dressmaker - seamstress. Drugstore. Florist sales. Fruit and vegetable market - retail. Gift shop. Grocery store - supermarket. Gymnasium. Health food store. Hobby shop. Hospital (general). Hospital or treatment center. Household furnishing shop. Ice cream shop. Jewelry - retail. Laundry, cleaning and dyeing - retail. Library. Meat market. Medical clinic. Mortuary - funeral home. Park. Photography studio. Playground. Post office. Professional building. Recreation center. Restaurant. Shoe and hat repair. Swimming pool - indoor. Tennis club - private or daily fee. T-rager. (Oa 1973 ccn z 28 1974 . aired 1994 Code; OFd_ 1994 !A, 2 10 1994 . n..a 2003 n i 7 22 200-3) GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-2) All uses permitted in the 0 and B-1 Districts. Appliances - sales. Army/Navy surplus sales. Art gallery - art studio sales. Art supply store. Automatic food service. Automobile accessory store. Automobile rental. Bicycle shop. Billiard parlor. Blueprint and photostat shop. gewfiag al4ey. Carry-out food service. Catalog sales office. Clothing store - all types. 1 Department store. Discount store. Drygoods store - retail. Floor covering sales. Furniture sales - new/used. Hardware store. Health club or gymnasium. Hotel. Interior decorating studio. Junior department store. Leather goods. Locksmith. Motel. Music, instrument and record store. Newspaper publishing. Office equipment and supply sales. Paint/wallpaper store. Pawnshop.. Personal loan agency. Pet store. Picture frame store. Radio and television studios. Sporting goods. Stationery. Taxidermist. Theater. Toy store. Typewriter - sales and repair. Variety store. Watch and clock sales and repair. Weaving and mending - custom. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. 1994 Code) SERVICE BUSINESS DISTRICT (B-3) All uses permitted in the B-2 district. Agricultural implement sales and service. Appliance - service only. Automotive sales and service. Boat sales. Building material sales. Business machine repair. Car wash without mechanical repair on the premises. Catering service. Drive-in restaurant. Electrical equipment sales. Feed and grain sales. Frozen food locker. Furniture repair and refinishing. Golf driving range. Greenhouse. KeterRI Miniature golf. Motorcycle sales and service. Nursery. Orchard. Park - commercial recreation. Plumbing supplies and fixture sales. Pump sales. Recreational vehicle sales and service. Tardeab saFa ge. Tennis court - indoor. T-r-ailer-rentel. Tnwk rental Truck sales and service. Upholstery shop. Veterinary clinic. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-1974; amd. Ord. 1986-1, 1-9-1986; Ord. 1988-7, 4-14-1988; Ord. 1995-19, 8-10-1995; Ord. 1998-21, 6-25-1998; Ord. 2005-58, 7-12- 2005) - EXHIBIT "D" Concept PUD Plan —13— EXHIBIT "E" Dark Sky Requirements Lighting shall be provided for the PROPERTY in accordance with the City Zoning Ordinance 10-11-3.17.7 and as described below: 1 . Wall packs on buildings are prohibited; 2. The average foot-candle intensity on the PROPERTY shall be 2.0 — 2.5 footcandles; 3. The lighting intensity at the east, west, and south property line shall be zero; 4. Sag lenses are prohibited; 5. Light shields used to control light and reduce glare shall be made of nonreflective material; 6. Automobile Dealership: a. Feature/Display Area: i. The first row of vehicles adjacent to US 34 including the area in front of the vehicle up to the property line and behind the vehicle up to the merchandise area and/or circulation area including drive aisles shall be a maximum of 75 foot candles; b. Merchandise Area: i. All other rows of vehicles on a lot used for general auto sales, including all areas surrounding the vehicle up to the defined circulation area including related drive aisles shall be a maximum of 50 foot candles; c. Circulation Area: i. All portions of the lot dedicated to customer parking, employee parking, site entrance areas and inventory areas included related drive aisles shall be a maximum of 10 foot candles; d. Security Lighting: i. The average amount of light found on the site within each of the areas of activity, including the Feature/Display Area, the Merchandise Area, and the Circulation Area, from 10:00 P.M. until sunrise shall be a maximum of 10 foot candles; —14— EXHHIBIT "F" Automobile Dealership Display Area Pavement Detail —15— EXHIBIT "G" Landscape Plan —16— ;<<ED cl?, United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 3 Telephone: 630-5534350 Fax: 630-553-7575 PCB APPLICATION & PETITION ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST Development Name: Star European Imports Date df Submission: Requesting: 4 Annexation (Zoning fl Planned Unit Development p Special Use: 1. Name of Petitioner(s): _Unless Land Company Address: 9316 Route 34 , Yorkville, IL 60560 Phone Number: 630-553-6555 Fax Number. 630-636^9008 EmallAddress: wwwastarmerc ,com Relationship of Patitioner(s) to subject property: R Owner )Developer a Contract Purchaser 2: Name of holder of legal Ode, if different from #1: N /A . If legal fiffe is held in to Land Trust, fist the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: NIA 3, a). (1). Street address and physical location of subject property: 931.6 . .Route 34, •.Yorkville,.. IL.. 6QS60 (11). Zoning of surrounding parcels: North: United City of Yorkville B-3 Business District South: Kendall County R-3 Residential DEstrict East: United City of Yorkville B-3 Business District West: United City of Yorkville B-3 Business District b), ' Legal description of property, attach as Exhibit "A". c). Total Acreage: 2 d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of property: 02-28-252-002 e). Current Zoning Classification: .-Kendall County B-3 Business District f). Zoning Classification Requested: PUD g). Is this property within City Ilmits? Yes X No, requesting annexation Page 1 ors United City ofYotkville Annezalion,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/20/06 4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners and Ian downers wilhin 600' entitled to notice of petition under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: Attach a separate list and label as Exhibit "B" 5. List all governmental entities or agencies required to receive notice under Illinois law: 'Bristol Township, 8'eMPINKiind0k. Fire Department 6. List the Illinois Business lax Number (IBT#) for the State of Illinois and names of businesses located on subject property to be annexed: 7. Does a flood piafh exist on the subject property? No 8. Do Electors reside on the subject property? No If so, they must execute this petition to annex. (Electors as defined by Illinois Law Is a resident of the parcel who Is a registered voter. Legal owners of the annexing parcel must . sign the petition regardless of place of residence or legal voting status.) 9. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquides regarding this petition maybe directed: Attorney Daniel J . Kramer Ptioine 630553-9500 fax • 630-553 5764 _1107A S , Bridge Street Yorkville IL 60560 Attorney: Name: Danfid J . Kramer Address: 1107A S : Bridge Street Yorkville IL 60560 . Phone Number: " 630=553-95U0" " ' �c Number. 630=553=5764 Email Address: Dkramer @dankramerlaw rom Engineer Name:: Zabel EnaitnWing Address: 203 Soutli Rosedale Ave. Aurora IL 60506 Phone Number. 630-649-3634 Fax Number 630-892-1087 Email Address: wkz40amerftP h net Land Planner: Name: N /A Address: Phone Number. Fax Number, Email Address: Page 2 of 5 United City ofYodtvllle Anomallon,PUD,Zoning,$Pmial Use Application Revised; ling(06 10. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project, a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies, b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to page 4 of this application to 'Patitioner Route, Step 1, Fees" and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount). c. Concept or Preliminary Site Plan: 40 sets folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope. d. One CD containing one electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with exhibits) and site plan. In witness whereof the following pefifioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is contiguous to the United City of Yorkville, Date: Sp_f a t} /Og Petltioner(s aturegai properly owners signatures must appear on this application.) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 } _ day ofQ6AnL 200Y_, Notary Seal OFFICIAL SEAL THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. COLLEEN HANSON NOTARYKMW -STATE OF ILLINOIS Mf(�AMMSSpN E7tPIRE8:1GRN11 Pnge 3 of United City of Yorkville Annexation,PMZcning,special Uss Applinntion Revised: 11128/06 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE WESTERLY 334 FEET, AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34 OF THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION, 40 LINKS EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 34.82 CHAINS TO AN ANGLE IN THE CENTER LINE OF OSWEGO ROAD; THENCE NORTH 53 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID OSWEGO ROAD 111 .54 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 07 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 608.4 FEET TO A POINT 340 FEET SOUTHERLY OF, MEASURED ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE EXTENDED, THE CENTER LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34 FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 07 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS LINE "A", A DISTANCE OF 400.01 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34 PER PLAT OF RIGHT OF WAY PLANS RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2002-08871 AND 2002-20014; THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 334.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE THAT IS 334.00 FEET EASTERLY OF (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34) AND PARALLEL WITH LINE "A" AS AFORESAID; THENCE SOUTH 07 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 400.01 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN EASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID U.S. ROUTE 34, FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 83 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 334.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. e��p C1T` Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 001M Legal ❑ P� � EST. 1 I 1936 Finance ❑ 1 Engineer Tracking Number City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑ PC 2008-21 y<tE �'° ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Loren and Rhonda Miller - 1 % Mile Review for Rezoning (A- 1 to M-1) Meeting and Date: EDC / October 7, 2008 Synopsis: Request for 1 '/2 Mile Review for a rezoning request to Kendall County for A-1 to M-1 zoning Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: n/a Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: majority Council Action Requested: Favorable recommendation to Kendall County Board Submitted by: Travis Miller Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: See staff attached report QED cl p1, Memorandum ' To: EDC EST. 1 , 1836 From: Travis Miller and Stephanie Boettcher 4 lull ~ ` - CC: Lisa Pickering (for distribution) p Date: September 22, 2008 I.E�'®2 Subject: PC2008-21 Loren and Rhonda Miller (1'% Mile Review) Background: The petitioner is seeking County M-1 zoning classification in their application. The current use of the property is an automotive body shop. The petitioner is requesting the change of zoning in order to comply with the business' state license/permit requirement. The Plan Commission reviewed the application September 10, 2008 and made the following action: - Motion to recommend approval of Kendall County M-1 zoning classification 6 ayes; 0 no Comprehensive Plan Recommendation for the Property The 2002 Comprehensive Plan recommends Commercial for the property. The intent of Commercial is: "... to promote market-sensitive development of commercial uses within strategically located areas to efficiently, effectively, and conveniently serve the growing local population, while continuing the importance of the United City of Yorkville as a regional center. " Staff Comments and Recommendations: • Staff recommends the M-1 rezoning is appropriate, despite the Comprehensive Plan recommendation, for the property given the existing use of the property and the surrounding land uses, specifically northwest of the subject property. • Given the existing use of the property, in which vehicles are stored onsite (outdoors), and that the property adjacent (to the south) is in a residential zone, the property should be enclosed by a solid wall/fence at least 8' in height per the County's M-1 zoning classification. • Seeing as the subject property does not have street frontage, an access easement shall be provided between the adjacent parcel to the northwest and the subject property, in order to provide access to the property from Cannonball Trail. If this easement already exists, the record number should be referenced on the Plat of Survey and Zoning Sketch. • The subject property is contiguous to the corporate boundary of Yorkville and could be annexed. Based on the current lack of utility services for the property, and the fact that the petitioner is not proposing any change of use or redevelopment of the property, staff is not recommended annexation. PC 2008-21 Miller 1 '/2 Mile Review — Location Map C6rn0s Rd Huff{St., `__..., l✓'i l ` NoTthgt J' Subject Prope h s R � � U.. - f t � I �1 i ✓ _ �I - c B vi - - - — Pravie Md�tlows of i. United City OI YOINVI!!¢G!5 The Data is providedwhhout warranty atanympresinmdon of ,1 y accuracy,timeliness,or completeness.h is dW resporwiitpltyof the w 19 Parcel Data and Aellal PhO[Ography "Requester"In determine accuracy,llmellnesa,completeness,and < r Provided Sy Kendall County GlS appropriamness efts use.The United City of Yorkville makes no warmndes,expressed or lmpikQ to tie use of the Data. United City of Yorkville 2 O 800 Game Farm Road PYorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax : 630-553-7575 <LE 55� APPLICATION & PETITION FOR CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW AND COUNTY MILE AND ONE-HALF REVIEW PLEASE CIRCLE UNDERLYINGTYPE OF €ST Annexation & Zoning Rezoning PLO Amendment 1 '/ Idle Revlev - -- .> Development Name: IMEN MITT TR Date of Submission: 1 . Name of Petitioner(s): LOREN P4ILL R Address: PO BOX 355 Phone Number: 630-553- 1738 Fax Number: Email Address: Relationship of Petitioner(s) to subject property: r ,,Qwner [j Developer [j Contract Purchaser 2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from #1 : TogETS MILLER and RHONDA L MILLER If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: 3. a). Street address and physical location of subject property: 94500 CANNOMM T RRTSTOT . TT . 6(1519 b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit "A". c). Total Acreage: 0 . 753 d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of property: 02- 16-426-010 e). Current Zoning Classification: AC f). Zoning Classification Sought: M- 1 g). Is this property within City limits? Yes —15 bou No, requesting annexation (If no is checked, is the property contiguous with existing City ndaries? _ Yes XX No) Page I of 5 United City of Yorkville ConcepV1 -1/2 mile Review Application Revised 11/28/06 4. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: Attorney: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: Engineer: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: Land Planner: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: 5. If 1 /S Mile County Review, what is county zoning currently? AC Requested Zoning: 1'1-1 Zoning of surrounding parcels: North: A-1 South: A-1 East: R - 1 West: na_ 1 6. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description. b. 15 copies each of the application, proposed drawings, location map, site plan are needed to be scheduled for the staff review meeting. c. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to Page 4 of this application "Petitioner Route, Step 1 , Fees" and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount). d. One CD containing one electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with exhibits), proposed drawings, location map, and site plan. For the Plan Commission Meeting, an additional submittal is need as follows: d. Concept Plan: 35 sets folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope e. 35 copies of the application with legal description. Page 2 of 5 United City of Yorkville Concept/1-1/2 mile Review Application Revised: 11/28/06 In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct. Date: July 30 , 2008 Petitioner(s) Signature: Loren E Puller .John Ri is s \ V)) J Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30th day of D A ,I Y 200 q OFF cl4A 14LL f y1 9 J7.7I P? l��°Gl. ( KLF Notary Seal MAOOUSAD LE3 ry NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS h1Y COMtdI310h1 EY.PIF.:S 77/OB2Ott THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. CONCEPT PLAN and COUNTY MILE AND ONE-HALF REVIEW PETITIONER ROUTE Page 3 of 5 United City of Yorkville Concept/1-1/2 mile Review Application Revised: 1123/06 RE : Loren Miller 2450C Cannonball Bristol , IL 60512 PIN : 02- 16-426-010 /hu ! nort ; lf Me Southeast OUGrtCr of Section 18, Township •1•ort/q, h'or;grl 7 fast of the Third Principal Meridion described C`vwrre>ocing of the A/ortheost corner of sold ,: ,5400e? '- ')uufler, thence South 12231 ' Cost along the EaS1 line ;pril �;;; /holst Qc;orter ,365. 24 feet for the point of beginning; ncr; Ala z`h 1 :2? "31 " Most along the Cost line of sold Southeast ', urtc- 3,>3'5-2-- feet to the Northeast corner thereof thence r6�=st olonq the North line of said Southeast rtes 3'F'. fh G;=el thence South 037" Cost 99. 09 feet; thence t 70575 "7c:>et; thencz Sauth -77-'12"40 '"-East 't 1!i feet; ih : are South 037' East 209. 00 feet to a line drawn h 'r" " '0 '" Most from the point of beginning; thence South f ' TJ olong said line 95. 50 feet to the point of ,i.nning if) B> i t>: ? 1 >wnship, Kendall County, Illinois. P/otof Survey and Zoning Sketch of Part of the Southeast Quarter of 16—,,37- 7 Bristol Township* Kenda ll County Illinois N / , /it r KJ°er Harov t. 1 t " t{ 1 647• Asphalt `� •� \'js 3�8T43 86. 96 ' 6 / - �A /'7 '.; m' North qst corner of ' 40" ®� � °\ i i the =east Ouarter Mahal) p, _ - - - ' 8ank� _ \ 64S` II \oJ SecMbn 16-37-7 15 and G �`\ / 64375 Asphalt pit I one a and I + ' / I From ona Store ` Matal flatldin9 1 '� \ w I arele , o�aro9e 643.6 � 6 3256 Graial / � I E `.\ ♦ I m ' 1 —328'7 332 ""{q 1 22� o l \ E N TII v Asphalt \ , % ,, ' I w 1 °• °j ,� K1per 0. �5j A�� I N°rOld A9 P.I.N. 02-16-426-070 Present Zoning AG pove2° III r` '_ ' a Proposed Zoning M-1 Jones A9 a Indicates Iron Stake Found ( s Soils as indicated in is iD Indicates Indicates Utility Pole Survey of Kendo/l County, — E — Indicates Overhead Utilities Illinois i I �\ - -- 64, - - - Indicates Existing Contours 103 Houghton muck II m can°ata ` X 3 Indicates Existing Elevation 3180 Lorenzo loam 64 62 3258 Dresden silt loom I b Legal Descrip tion: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said e tii I Southeast Quarter,- thence South 12231 "' East along the East line I of said Southeast Quarter 365.24 feet for the point of beginning,- ty Land ae�e m it to thence North 12231 " West along the East line of said Southeast m Quarter 365. 24 feet to the Northeast corner thereof• thence South 874332"" West along the North line of said Southeast Quarter 86. 96 feet,• thence South 0:37' East 99. 09 feet,• thence South 874332" West 105.25 feet,• thence South 77'12'40 " East 108. 16 feet• thence South 037' Cost 209. 00 feet to a line drawn North 743109 " West from the point of beginning; thence South I i ; 743109" East along said line 95. 50 feet to the point of I beginning in Bristol Township, Kendall County, !//inois � � s - - - - - - - �4 State of Illinois: 9SS0- SS �_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 638 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ County of Kendo/L• This is to certify that we, James M. Olson Associates, Ltd., Illinois Professional Land s'9 Surveyors, hove surveyed and located improvements on the foregoing described property as shown by the plat hereon drawn which is a correct representation of said survey. This - - - professional service conforms to the current Alinol's Minimum Standards for a Boundary Survey. The field work was completed on April 23, 2008. Dated at Yorkville, Illinois June 6, 2008. Pre pored for 1 James M. Olson P r'r0FDS_1011M11. ilc t)) E Illinois Professional Land Surveyor No. Loren Miller -` F"' 1 " ? 2253License expires November 30, 2008 e 28 Hickory Lane Domes M. Olson Associates, Ltd. York vi!/e, Illinois 60560 ,,4; . ; 107 West Madison Street Yorkville, !//inois 60560 (630) 553-0050 Miller No. 9443 `,��D C/py Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number p Legal ❑ PC,Finance F-1 EST. �- 1636 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number City Administrator ❑ Consultant ❑❑ F-Dp2008-31 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Comprehensive Plan Update-Commuter Station Land Use map modification Meeting and Date: EDC/October 7, 2008 Synopsis: See attached memo Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: n/a Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Stephanie Boettcher Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: A Public Hearing to consider the Plan Commission recommendation to adopt the Draft Comprehensive Plan(2008 Update) has been scheduled for Tuesday October 28, 2008. u 0 Ott Memorandum EsT ess To: Economic Development Committee From: Stephanie Boettcher, Senior Planner CC:Travis Miller,Community Development Director Date: August 15,2008 E v� Subject: Land Use Map Modifications(Commuter Rail Station) Following the August Economic Development Committee meeting, staff was given direction to reconsider the land uses surrounding the proposed Metra Station and provide an alternative. Two Metra studies,"Land Use in Commuter Rail Station Areas: Guidelines for Communities," and"Residential Development Near Commuter Rail Stations,"were used as the models for modifying the 2008 Land Use Map surrounding the proposed Metra Station. Both studies provided recommended land uses within 1/2 mile— 1 mile of the train station,in order to provide for the highest level of pedestrian access to the station and highest Metra ridership. The study, "Land Use in Commuter Rail Station Areas: Guidelines for Communities," developed these recommendations in more detail based on the location of the train station. Given this,the model from this study for"stations outside of suburban business districts"was used as it was the most comparable to a full build out scenario of the proposed train station, see full study attached. Highlights of these policies include: • Support Housing Mix—approximately 1/3 of units to be multifamily and 2/3 of units to be single family within 1/2 mile of the train station. • Create and maintain both vehicular and pedestrian access to the station. • Provide convenience retail services within walking distance of the station. These services include coffee shops, dry cleaners, day care centers,banks, etc. Using these guidelines, two approaches were taken. The first approach,seen in Plan 1, does not provide a buffer land use(Mixed Use)between the Commercial use running along US 34 and Suburban Neighborhood use just north of it. This was done to provide more single family housing given the aforementioned statement,in which single family should comprise 2/3 of the housing selection within%2 mile of the station. In contrast,Plan 2 provides the buffer,Mixed Use,between the Commercial use and Suburban Neighborhood use and provides for more Neighborhood Retail along Faxon Road. Besides these,the two approaches are identical. Similarities between the plans include: • The location of the proposed station and the accompanied Neighborhood Retail use. • Parking,provided north of the proposed Faxon Road and north of the tracks along Beecher. Parking facilities should be within 1/4 of a mile(2 blocks) of the station. Amount provided is slightly more than what is shown on Metra's guidelines. • The Public/Quasi Public Land use,along Beecher Road and Rob Roy Creek. It is recommended to have Institutional uses within%2 mile(4 blocks) of the station. • Office/Research Land use between Y2- 1 mile from the train station. • Regional retail centers(Commercial)greater than 1/2 mile from train station. Plan 1 I , I , i �1 I 1 I i H aG I I i- n. � - - -Naglan-Dr r I • o Suburban Neighborhood oananD o- m_ - w I - 1h / i I Commuter Rail / o`'/ �R*e ay- I , St ado �° Mbaed Use E deny Ot�ice/Research . e �/denfod-Or' _ D G. c .SCerhercY" Suburban � .. j,Nmleas-Srl` Neighborholl:1d Ln —_-WHoneY'ocKle l' MI Use f• 1 _ __ Re'Wud Di a�� DeaMes'SS a I• -- _ I I i• � 4ve=��o� Suburban—' - / _ 'Yellowslo Nelghborh0 t 40 Denise Ct, Suburban \ •`' / / - -- e � . ¢TO 1r!� Neighborhood `• / Mbwd Use car e w A` . + kendall Yt_ 1 garketplace Commerical Proposed and/or _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ ExisdngTrails On-brown) i r g rush-copley 1 county government %a - "'"- ` -F _ _ - health facility complex - -Klatt St Y com p _ - 1 -Cummins B, p ' _ ! ui' As ec.' -1rL ,. 'I—� A JndeAeodzn" shrtlt-Ln- ' i m� Ddton S� i� ' - m.. aCarly Cn V�c�C I Dobbins St'-� , , - ___ 1 ;�� �1 -Purcell-St ��, o� I ,c'„- +stn-- - by -Andrew°St P_ +': �4' '�M r ' 1 -Wnodview-St. I � 1 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles United City of Yorkville GIS H i Plan ;W-Beecher Rd= - Beecte we L \ � b i i I - ' -�- ----- �-Nathan-Dr Suburban ' Neighborhood j` I I taa/ 0111 Wn o 6.41 .fie/ n Commuter rtrrie Way- StatiO t Office/Research r�\eCa Mb led Use de o ICI _ Q• � _ _ - __ _____________ Suburban Neighborhood " "�J to Ln Ret�od DF°.. 0 w',Icy .�• i_r.gaxbini, v�to �MbagdUse i. Alecst, Suburban-- Neighborhood vc �p C, i Suburban 9t5t � aS�" - -__-:-_ _-Rlar4hom•Chn....Fn � Neighborh , Mbced Use h X ti E M6aeaUse Car' ' kendall marketplace r 0 --'"4rs^nd and/or M brown) ' .�._ ___o =_,aF -: �- ;- - rush-Copley , county government -Klatt St- - >, health facility l complex ,$ummins 5 l / �A 1 -Dillon-4 i� , _. v '' c earl, -. -Dobbins St' 1 , , =vz -Purcel"t -� •Conover L-n__ --= =--fbli-5t^, I 1 ' -Andrew-st e�>._ `\' ' r�.� �,:�� ,.r; 6 - . 1 - Woodview-SF n AI 1 �c I _il l 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Miles United City of Yorkville Gls a LAND USE IN COMMUTER RAIL STATION AREAS: GUIDELINES FOR COMMUNITIES Summary Recommendations and General Land-Use Patterns to Integrate Commuter Rail Stations with Surrounding Communities '4s A AfiLINGTOV NeIGHIS Si^�0''. These Guidelines have been created to assist local jurisdictions in maximizing the community development opportunities provided by the presence of Metra commuter rail stations. This project is a joint effort of Metra and the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission (NIPC). For more information or assistance in applying the Guidelines, call: Metra Real Estate and Planning Department, at (312) 322-6972, or NIPC Planning Services Department at (312) 454-0400. etra northeastern illinois planning commission INTRODUCTION A Metra commuter rail station is a valuable ridership with local employment destinations. community asset, providing both a physical Convenient retail services, in turn, provide and a symbolic link to convenient, prompt, and local economic benefits, and serve to attract affordable transportation. The intrinsic value additional ridership. These Station-Area of the station is often reflected in surrounding Guidelines describe general approaches for land values. Appropriate land uses in the sta- local communities, Metra, and NIPC to work tion environs can serve to generate originating together to maximize community planning ridership from residential areas, and attract opportunities and achieve common goals. PROTOTYPE COMMUTER RAIL STATIONS INTEGRATING THE STATION Local jurisdictions desiring additional The Guidelines focus on functionally information and detailed examples are integrating the station into the community. referred to the companion publication Land The emphasis is on the "greater" station area Use in Commuter Rail Station Areas: Analysis (about two square miles) beyond, and and Final Report. This document provides including, the "immediate" station area. nine prototype examples, three for each of the Matra and local communities can formulate general classifications most prevalent today, options based upon several key factors: depicting existing land-use patterns in the station areas, rail-service characteristics, and ■ Importance of the station to the community summaries of access modes. Insights on ■ Station location and environs successes and future plans for the station area are included. Metra and NIPC also provide ■ Adjacent business services useful suggestions for enhancing or renewing ■ Amenities within the depot commuter rail station areas, on a variety of scales, through appropriate development or ■ Station-area aesthetics redevelopment. ■ Station access r 7`1' iY_ linL STATION TYPES AND PRIMARY SURROUNDING LAND USES The physical relationship of the stations to On the other side of this brochure, general their surrounding development will generally "typical' land-use patterns are portrayed for prescribe the economic/land-use interactions each of the six station-area classifications, which can be established, enhanced, or along with specific guidelines for recommend- renewed. Matra and NIPC have identified six ed categories and intensities of development. general classifications of station locations The suggested land uses can be adapted or (defined below), based upon their situation. combined depending upon local objectives. EXISTING STATIONS ON THE PRESENT RADIAL RAIL SYSTEM (OR FUTURE STATIONS ON LINE EXTENSIONS) Stations in High Density Urban Areas are generally located in mature, densely developed areas, either in the City of Chicago or outlying satellite cities. Stations in Suburban Central Business Districts(CODs) are located within local suburban commercial business districts. While commercial land uses (including offices, retail, and services) predominate, they are often mixed with residential uses. Stations in Areas Outside of Suburban CBDs are also located in suburban communities but outside of local business districts, often near municipal boundaries. They frequently serve as relievers to suburban downtown stations, and vary in distance from suburban CBDs. Stations in Underdeveloped or Developing Areas are generally located near outer segments of commuter rail lines. They usually serve as collectors for wide, sparsely developed areas, and are often termed "cornfield" stations in the vernacular. FUTURE STATIONS ON NEW NON-RADIAL RAIL ROUTES Stations in Highway Rights-of-Way will be located within or alongside expressway or major arterial rights-of-way, usually offering access to rail service near major highway intersections. They will serve developments near new suburb-to-suburb rail routes. Stations in Office/Shopping Complexes will be located at major regional office complexes and shopping centers. They will serve complexes adjacent to new expressway/major arterial or other (converted from existing non-commuter) suburb-to-suburb rail routes. FZ�-7 GUIDELINES FOR LAND-USE DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT A commuter rail station can have a positive impact on surrounding development or redevelopment. A station can also be a catalyst for achieving local economic development goals, encouraging spe- cific types of station-area improvements, and increasing the local tax base through the stimulation of higher land values. Some development planning points: ■ Provide for rail commuters' service and retail needs by creating convenience-oriented Commuter Service Centers. • Develop Transportation Centers, in appropriate locations, which provide access for fixed-route or feeder buses and bus/rail interchange facilities. • Develop pedestrian links from ground-level stations, which create visual pathways to surrounding commercial, residential, and employment locations. • Provide functional overhead pedestrian connections, allowing direct access into nearby office buildings or retail centers, in station areas with rail on embankment. • Revise zoning ordinances to allow a variety of mixed-use developments in or near the central business district;for example, higher residential development densities increase pedestrian station access and benefit nearby commercial areas. • Promote commuter rail as a mode for bringing workers into the area for local employment opportunities, and provide shuttle services to work locations. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Local objectives should be defined, reflecting a consensus of the community. In many cases, the creation of a station-area development plan is recommended as a first step. Once devised, strategies will be needed to achieve implementation of the plan. Some useful methods which might be employed for redevelopment and /or improvement: • Adopt zoning regulations that will achieve the community's purpose and create a favorable development climate. • Provide public funds for infrastructure-improvement projects which will stimulate private business investment. • Obtain private investment to accomplish local goals by soliciting development proposals for specific parcels. • Form a public/private partnership in which the community, Matra, and a private investor participate in a project. =� Enlist help from local volunteer groups for small-scale amenity programs, especially for beautification of the immediate station area. ® Respect existing community assets such as historic sites, parks, and natural areas in the planning process. GUIDELINES FOR PARKING AND ACCESS Historically, most rail stations have been placed in, or have spurred development of, community downtowns. In any case, regardless of location, the commuter stations have served as the focus for intense surrounding land uses. A frequent side effect of such nearby development, and required commuter parking facilities, is increased automobile traffic. Some general guidelines for alleviating congestion around the commuter rail station: ■ Promote provision of shared or joint-use parking for originating commuters, shopping patrons, or office/retail employees. ■ Consider multi-level commuter parking structures, particularly to retain or reallocate land for more productive uses. ■ Institute traffic mitigation techniques, such as one-way streets, turn lanes, or traffic signals. ■ Provide sufficient access facilities for fixed-route or feeder buses and taxis; include separated paths for buses and cars using kiss-and-ride areas, and loading zones that do not block other vehicles. ■ Encourage bicycle use by commuters by providing bicycle storage facilities; provide separate and continuous access routes for bicycles within a two- to four-mile radius. ■ Provide safe and separate routes for pedestrians to and from residential areas, commuter parking lots, and nearby commercial areas or employment locations; make certain that pedestrian access is continuous within a one-mile radius. GUIDELINES FOR BASIC SERVICE AMENITIES An attractive station area with conveniences for both commuters and non-commuters can be a community asset with economic benefits. �YY Of particular importance to rail patrons is the w .a location of commuter-oriented convenience- retail services. The facilities provided will vary in scope or scale, depending upon the size of the community and the extent of the station's market area. Some of these can be provided within the depot or a Commuter Service n Center, and others by adjacent businesses. Special features to attract the commuter per•-` market include same-day services and coor- dinated extended business hours. Amenities which are commonly desirable in the immediate station area: • Newsstands ■ Dry-cleaning stores • Restaurants/coffee shops ■ Barber shops/hair salons • Fast-food outlets ■ Convenience-retail stores • Photo-finishing shops ■ Banking/ATM facilities • Video rental stores ■ Automotive services • Flower shops ■ Day-care centers hI� { - I Mj]:611�tE F�=3;r,nLi SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (VARIABLE DENSITIES) INSTITUTIONAL(PUBLIC OFF MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (VARIABLE DENSITIES) C=1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL/RESEARI MAP SCALE: L _.__ I STATIONS OUTSIDE OF SUBURBAN BUSINESS DISTRICTS nLnnnnILn ,11 E El I M -.40 n n n � n ❑ fin! nn ! - � � ® -- nnnnn [-j n nnnIF] n jinn Ll jr STRATEGY: Encourage multi-family residential, employment-related, and park-and-ride uses between stations and nearby business districts to support both areas. AREAS WITHIN TWO BLOCKS(1/4 MILE) OF STATION AREAS FOUR TO SIX BLOCKS (1/2 TO 314 MILE) FROM STATION .4djarcnl commuter-oriented convenience-retail nerd J Medlurrrdensity singlc family,with Borne,malu-fan, y. servk:es, with sinwt i i parking for midday acre=s residential areas by"prirby residents ❑ Suburban central OLISM'S9 districts or local comrnerel.I H,gh-eapacny commuter parking lots, including shopping slips or clusters parking structures,and bus/taxi/kiss-and-rido`acilities J Major cntertainmcnt or recreatsonal complexes AREAS WITHIN FOUR BLOCKS(UP TO 1/2 MILE) OF STATION (theaiers, sports s,adwms, bfc.) • Commercial office buildings or complexes j lnstitutiona' iao isles fscnoo;s, churches, etc.l • Local, county. or regional govve:nment administrative AREAS MORE THAN SIX BLOCKS (3/4 MILE) FROM STATION centers J Leaver-anc neri single family residential • Both multi-fa;_rily, induciing high rise apartment subdw siors 'buildings, and medium-density single-family -i Irdusuia', manuf;:c;urng, or wamhousing distrlcls residential areas J Local parks and recreatonal facilities CES/SCHOOLS/etc.) BUSINESS DISTRICT/REGIONAL RETAIL CENTERS U OFFICE BUILDING H CENTERS J LOCAL RETAIL (COMMUTER/NEIGHBORHOOD) U UNDEVELOPED VI .5 MILES I J .75 MILES -- STATIONS ALONG HIGHWAY RIGHTS-OF-WAY ID [� CJ ❑ ■ CI ❑ i-:1C7�� � 1r _ _ Ll F L u C� -1 11[ t 1� Ll Imo— -if—lf-1L -1 � STRATEGY'. Concentrate commercial, employment-related, multi-family residential, and park-arid-ride uses near stations located in highway corridors. AREAS WITHIN TWO BLOCKS(114 MILE) OF STATION AREAS FOUR TO SIX BLOCKS (1/2 TO 3/4 MILE) FROM STATION J A.ijacCnt cur n-:u ter-u'' n t(�•d move ur nce-ieLar ano J Mud[' r ns ry�,-0c -=r,, smith For to r' ult `an.=!y, servkocs, natl sh:xr-TemT parking for midday acceFs residential a z:as by nca2ny residuni J Light-nxr,C;h la 1, r,each-renter, c manu tacll;rinu J cNI11L'er paikrrg as-t d Pskyr ciiea ,l od-Isarkk,,;J ms-.I crs .. fac0Lt.es, ani3 bus/tasiia )'Ki-r,ck. facilites J Ms of rntr,rtainmcr•.t or e;ereatio•ial car-.ilexos AREAS WITHIN FOUR BLOCKS (UP TO 112 MILE) OF STATION !thea;ors, sports s!ar.':n°:s. atc J Rusill Sh0 in CenL',,r-.d rOnlli eieia bi.sinegs -t Ohl. .heS, Ck; districts and Iocal pa,ks -J Cnunty or -egro•ral gone ^mr r a dmlr;stra tivo canters AREAS MORE THAN SIX BLOCKS (3/4 MILE) FROM STATION J ^.amrne-c!d. office h, JIMUs J Lowe-and iTredium-density resideiI J IV Lit ly n:rsicie^.ial areas subdivisions J Local commeroie', sho.rping strips or clusters IOTEL/ENTERTAINMENT CENTERS LOCAL PARKS/OPEN SPACE ANT LAND (TO BE DEVELOPED) MW PARKING FACILITIES AVAILABLE TO COMMUTERS - 11.5 MILES ■ COMMUTER RAIL STATION STATIONS IN UNDEVELOPED OR DEVELOPING AREAS I _ _ FHE STRATEGY: Create station-oriented town Centers that offer walking and Cyrling links with surrounding single-family residential areas. AREAS WITHIN TWO BLOCKS (1/4 MILE) OF STATION AREAS FOUR TO SIX BLOCKS (1/2 TO 314 MILE) FROM STATION J Adjacent c..rvrmrer-orented woivori . ce-re[ail acid J l an,ar dei. i.� sin gle-f �'� su_ici r9' �.xrviskrn�s serv_.eS, v iL-s I-ort-Temr pa g is T n,dJiV access J igi11-iodr' nag cf icsc Bch-c°ntei r Stnc:a oy -:earbV reside�ts J Luce! ;jai<s zwfl u-.dnvodupad van.?.w t �d J CnmrrrT,ei pm ng to?s, planned fol ,r»II,staged aLLe ID h everned e5 al'ovei cx;arsiors, and bcs/taxi/kISS-and-ri(ie fecairics AREAS WITHIN FOUR BLOCKS (UP TO 112 MILE) OF STATION AREAS MORE THAN SIX BLOCKS(3/4 MILE) FROM STATION J Snarl commr idc. cLa.and office risulcls J Country--Mti:c lone,^-acre-plus lots) rceidonl at J IblediLl Clensity sincj.e-trrnllyres+dent al 9G(IdfV=Sion$ dwelopmert, -J offal parkr ane uneovc ooed vecanL land -1 Racrealional Doer-space aroas tla¢er to he devclopod as ahnvei STATIONS IN SUBURBAN CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICTS D —1 Ll D 111110MENEWMEH IMA J L IF- 11 J � ❑ ! � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � STRATEGY: Integrate stations with suburban central business districts and multi-family residential uses to create pedestrian-oriented environments. AREAS WITHIN TWO BLOCKS (1/4 MILE) OF STATION AREAS FOUR TO SIX BLOCKS (112 TO 3/4 MILE) FROM STATION J -.rs.rt cn.r.,o llr�_itcd-ona ,corvcr ic , G rP.la,l J f3ott, m!,,,i-family ann n.E:diunr-du�sa 5r:gle- a:'Vi .F'\9GC;g -8r••d� fosinU'llic aic.as J >_sm-.aterl ' .dra r; i�„ nLili[ie I..diny ._+r ring J nstituf:ci a..l .ic3l ., COS C`.ur r .,,istr;.i n ic!ures aro ha:"- s-;,End ri e ac i'JEe J '_ocal parks and' rec _a c,ii.: �ul!ucs AREAS WITHIN FOUR BLOCKS (UP TO 1/2 MILE) OF STATION J Sub!iibal canlrl= bl.siness s�.s-.ri;;ts,with mixed AREAS MORE THAN SIX BLOCKS (3/4 MILE) FROM STATION re E !;P oe s an.. .erb:ces j Mc; .unrf n isrsin, r ,iu1j esdsrtial w1utti-fr3..nily rs dociial seas, inc'.iding high-rise soUdivlsnna rpnrTne11t bd.nldings J Li;:e�ina ist'ial -esew ,r (x'I , d ai acaning i Crmc,.erc al office buildings and local government dil..Uk:.ls admmis-trative centers 0 northeastern illinois planning commission STATIONS IN OFFICE/SHOPPING COMPLEXES T STRATEGY: Locate statimrs and major commercial centers atprimary highway/railway intersections for park-and-ride and rail access to enlploynlent/shopping. AREAS WITHIN TWO BLOCKS (1/4 MILE) OF STATION AREAS FOUR TO SIX BLOCKS (1/2 TO 3/4 MILE) FROM STATION Jr(;;asi- olli .rterc i- '. m- I JIV.ult-�ainly-esioenlai areas, !Ick,dinc) high-rise and se vice-; apartme bJldl,-gs J I Ilyh+.apaCBy anrnluter a'kiny loll, in Jn!-g J Serontia!V re.ai'.' shopp i,g Centers wr..•.;gsiu^toles. arc hr� ia '.iki �aw �lde-v..i.irs J ig'nt-indus nal orreedara- c�ntc- m: i�ts AREAS WITHIN FOUR BLOCKS (UP TO 1/2 MILE) OF STATION AREAS MORE THAN SIX BLOCKS(3/4 MILE)FROM STATION Reglo,ial retail sbnpuuxr complexes J f�1U!ti-tinily r-sdertial a ::as C cnvire*vial c-ice buildings or J Medl.. n cent;L sF -ale, m,rl,; subdivisons J Hotels, Convention cenlo(s, and e^7°rt6mwlcnt or r'er,reP.tS onai Colilblexes LAND USE IN COMMUTER RAIL STATION AREA GUIDELINES FOR COMMUNITIES i STATIONS IN HIGH DENSITY URBAN AREAS l rr Fv-71 L Ll [ F IF F STRATEGY: Integrate stations with commercial, multi-family residential, and employment-related uses to encourage both origin and destination pedestrian access. AREAS WITHIN TWO BLOCKS(1/4 MILE) OF STATION AREAS FOUR TO SIX BLOCKS (1/2 TO 314 MILE) FROM STATION J Adjacent cm ir anted conv ierce, rClail y rMd i .dwm-den anri sorvices to Wily res n. .i2) mis L I—jled comp-.'.itur parking on strut Or small lets, c:;s o,th aryei parking let, in sacep!ie !I .. 'nn cus/-a;.i( J "'.iictienai f. ,.lido,�. rh o :, 9w nrP,r a. rtc kiss and-ride facilities AREAS WITHIN FOUR BLOCKS (UP TO 112 MILE) OF STATION AREAS MORE THAN SIX BLOCKS (3/4 MILE) FROM STATION U[I)S"s-c{p w s-lips I c' mots, d ldinc; •nixed J vlt.dn rn -n-�'.ty Single ,qm+1 :eel nl ill 'eas ISO de?v Jou ne ILI, con...icrc a] Pail a'at:ec:t rJ.Jgiao.Mood reiail stiol districts b„vCl aid�csicentai or o-�ice !ises ahcve -j Cormereialo-licen!-'.-dings '1,411I*i-Iei�iP/ res'u^dial e ce s etra Residential Development Naar Conunutcr Pail Stations Introduction and Backgrotud Alirrnaiivr tirratcnics i ....✓. Wide.rrrraiUn jai icseleamy..omevm mxr..murs Im: men.....nuence isncse metvm.uama aer raramelnn nr Omcic,-1Jefhelud Vl[ammo yr niL ma Thme nemamennn.n ln[Irrar' r �� N .4, rr • .. ._ �lA ..,. m u ... _.. -- -- ('anruuun T'rinrip�es Common Principles .:-'............. Optimums for Station Areas FT9. ........ l Lint . ..M. .nn 11 P e/N tra Synthesi of Study Findings: Approa hes to Residential Develop iient in Station Areas AI9tiGi � � — — s�1i'n�iui� q n i - gill; ��� - IL Matra Rail ® V' p � 'Y 7. ❑ an � if� l Q -� hr_ — i �.a BUILDING PERMIT REPORT United City of Yorkville Department of Building Safety and Zoning August 2008 ....... ........ ...... ....... . ......... ........ ....... . ...... .. Tv P as of Permits ......... ......... 2-Family Commercial Number of Permits Issued SFD olullsais,2005, Multiple-Family (Beginning 2006,C.1,g.,inel.des Industrial Miscellaneous* Total Construction Cost 2 Permds=I S"vWl) Ratio,&) August 2008 53 6 0 0 1 0 46 $1,519,150.00 Calendar Year 2008 641 102 6 0 27 0 506 $60,394,769.00 Fiscal Year 2008 357 57 4 0 10 0 286 $43,760,852.00 .......... ............. ........... ........ .......................... August 2007 118 27 2 1 4 0 84 $14,489,670.00 Calendar Year 2007 909 288 8 2 34 0 577 $111,664,925.00 Fiscal Year 2007 545 142 4 2 17 0 380 $56,109,130.00 August 2006 153 77 6 0 3 0 67 $16,889,531.00 Calendar Year 2006 1142 554 40 5 30 0 513 $121,766,519.00 Fiscal Year 2006 602 233 20 2 16 0 331 $60,696,486.00 .............. ............ ............................... August 2005 101 30 0 0 5 0 66 $7,869,510.00 Calendar Year 20051 863 309 5 0 34 0 511 $75,703,625.00 Fiscal Year 2005 546 182 0 0 19 0 346 $42,029,169.00 .................... ...................... ............... ...... .............. ............. ...... ............... ... ............... .... .............................. .................................. .. . . . . ..................................................... August 2004 122 54 0 0 4 1 63 $10,480,104.00 Calendar Year 2004= 738 341 3 0 11 1 381 $68,619,462.00 Fiscal Year 2004 466 1 209 0 0 8 1 248 $43,593,867.00 Permit Number Y-05-0012 was saided,thus only 963 of864 assrhenedperade numbers were actually used 2 Permit Number Y-04-097 and Y-04-098 were issuedfor each side afa daelss,,only I structure was built 'Miscellaneous includes additions,remodelling,garages,sheds,swimadagpools,decks,foe alarselsprinklerplan,reviews,ssunidpalprojvcls,etc. Report prepared by: Barbara J.Deamer,MCP,Department olrBuilding Safety and Zoning BUILDING PERMIT REPORT United City of Yorkville Department of Building Safety and Zoning September 2008 ............ ...... ...... .. Types of Permits ............. 2-Family Commercial Number of Permits Issued SFD (ftin.i.,2005. Multiple-Family (8edj-rne2006,Cffe9OqinH1,des Industrial Miscellaneous- Total Construction Cost 2 Peneks-I S111e,1111) Ruildetes) September 2008 73 9 0 0 3 0 61 $3,528,245.00 Calendar Year 2008 714 211 6 0 30 0 567 $63,923,014.00 Fiscal Year 2008 430 66 4 0 10 0 301 $47,289,097.00 . .. ... ........ ......... ...... ... ..... .......... ...... .. .. .. ...... .......................... ...... ...... .. September 2007 112 50 2 0 6 0 54 $9,047,989.00 Calendar Year 2007 1 1 1019 338 10 2 40 0 629 $120,712,914.00 Fiscal Year 2007 655 192 6 2 23 0 432 $65,157,119.00 .. ........ . . . . ............ ............. ...... .. ..... ................. ...... .. .. .. .. ....... September 2006 158 78 4 0 2 0 74 $14,291,845.00 Calendar Year 2006' 1299 1 631 44 5 32 0 587 $135,956,364.00 Fiscal Year 2006 759 310 24 2 18 0 405 $74,886,331.00 .......... ..................... September 2005 105 39 0 0 2 0 64 $7,467,860.00 Calendar Year 20053 968 347 5 0 36 0 575 $83,171,485.00 Fiscal Year 2005 651 221 0 0 20 0 410 $49,497,029.00 ........... ....... September 2004 89 37 0 0 1 0 51 $7,802,290.00 Calendar Year 2004' 827 378 3 0 12 1 432 $76,421,752.00 Fiscal Year 2004 555 246 0 0 9 1 299 $51,396,157.00 Permit Numbers Y-07-0765 and Y-07-0766 Issued in August 2007 were refunded/voided in Septsinber 2007,thus the metal nausher of permits is now actually 1019 instead 0.0021. Psmit.Nuenbe,Y-06-0626 issued in May 2006 was refunded/voided in September 2006,thus the analnuinber oftwrtnits is now actual(v 1299 instead of 1300. Permit Number Y-05-0012 was voided.thas only 968 of969 assigned permit numbers were actuat1j,used. Permit Nutabe,Y-04-097 and Y-04-098 were issued for each side of duplar,only I structure was built. C7 -Aff,eell...s hulads.,additi.as.resoedrlfing decks,fire aterat/strinklerplan reviews, nunicip.tproleds,etc. Report prepared by: Barbara I Deftmer,MCA Department of Building Safety and Zoning ,QED CI?"k Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J= s ® Legal ❑ Q E1 Finance ❑ ESn 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number o ® � y City Administrator ❑ 9 ��O Consultant ❑ ED L{ L� <LE ��'y El Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: September Plan Commission Report Meeting and Date: EDC — October 7, 2008 Synopsis : Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken : Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested : Submitted by: Travis Miller Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Coop ® Memorandum rim To: EDC/City Council iris From: Travis Miller, Community Development Director - CC: Brendan McLaughlin, City Administrator ® w Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Date: September 12, 2008 <tE y Subject: Plan Commission Actions September 10, 2008 PC 2008-18 Richard Marker Associates, Inc. — Special Use Request Motion to recommend approval in accordance with staff comments 6 ayes; 0 no PC 2008-19 Urness Land Company (Star European Imports) — Annexation and PUD Zoning Request Motion to recommend approval of Annexation subject to staff comments 6 ayes; 0 no Motion to recommend PUD Zoning 6 ayes; 0 no PC 2008-21 Loren Miller — 1 % Mile Review of Rezoning Request (A-1 to M-1) Motion to recommend approval of Kendall County M-1 zoning classification 6 ayes; 0 no Additional Business Steering Committee make-up for Zoning Ordinance Evaluation and Update Motion to approve the steering committee make-up as presented by staff and request for staff to begin contacting potential committee members and schedule a kick-off meeting in October. 6 ayes; 0 no C/Ty Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number ® Legal ❑ N B kl l Finance ❑ EST. �-..., _ 1836 Engineer ❑ Tracking Number +A \ City Administrator F1 g� �O Consultant ° Eb �r;$ - y � IE �® ° Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Naturalized Basin Management — Discussion regarding HOA Education Meeting and Date: EDC / October 7, 2008 Synopsis: See attached memo Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: n/a Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Travis Miller Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: C/T` 2° Memorandum To: EDC ESI I 1836 From: Travis Miller ~ CC: Laura Haake ^o Joe W r of ��®L 'a`;� o Date: September 23, 2008 LE Subject: Naturalized Stormwater Basin Management Issue• Several stormwater basins in the City are designed, approved and constructed with naturalized plantings. These basins require special maintenance techniques during the time of construction and throughout the life of the basin. Typically, these areas are required to be monitored and maintained by the developer for a specific period of time (typically 3 years) following construction, then conveyed to a property owners' or home owners' association for perpetual maintenance. Current Assessment: The Community Development and Engineering Department staff have prepared an action plan to inventory and evaluate all existing basins in the City (naturalized, wet and/or dry). This inventory will be incorporated into the GIS and include location, ownership, type of basin and many other attributes that will assist staff to continue to monitor the status of all basins. The database information will allow staff to react quickly in the event there is a failure (such as a naturalized basin being invaded with weed species resulting in an inability of the basin to function properly, for example). This will be an ongoing project and staff will report back to this committee on progress over the coming months. City's Role: - To ensure developer implements and manages the basins for the monitoring/establishment period. - Education of homeowners - In an effort to ensure the POA/HOAs are educated with the unique maintenance techniques required by these basins, the Community Development Department will be facilitating a session, with the assistance of Pizzo & Associates, Inc. and The Conservation Foundation, for the current HOAs in the City. This event is scheduled for Wednesday October 15, 2008 at 7:00 P.M. and will be held in the Yorkville Library meeting room. - Correct a problem if a developer or POA/HOA fails to do so. In the event a basin is not managed appropriately or effectively, it can create a hazard to the community if the capacity of the basin or overall function of the basin becomes diminished. If this occurs during a warrantee period, there are bonding/securities in place that would provide the City the funds necessary to step in and intervene. In a situation where a developer has met all obligations in terms of warrantee periods, the City would need to rely on other funding resources. Provisions for Dormant (or Zero) SSA's are included in some annexation/development agreements (a separate staff report provides an inventory of existing SSA's) — this would be a funding source which would allow the City to assess the properties served by the basin for the amount necessary to correct the problem(s). Summary There is no immediate action necessary of the Committee at this time. The purpose of the memo is to outline a potential issue recognized by staff. Staff hopes to prevent naturalized basin monitoring and management from becoming a greater issue for the City. This issue has become relevant given the amount of residential development beginning in 2004-2006 and the formulation of HOA/POA's that will be assuming critical responsibilities related to the stormwater basins. These groups may not be as equipped or experienced as the land developer in managing these systems and staff suggests future education may be necessary to maintain these native ecosystems. rn n ir-.. i — CONSERVATION FOUNDATION Managing Natural Common Areas: Home Owners Association Educational Seminar Opportunity The Conservation Foundation,and Pizzo &Associates Ltd. have teamed together to provide a seminar for HOA's in answer to the growing demand for education about natural areas in subdivisions. This two phase seminar focuses on the benefits of native plantings and details on how they are implemented and managed, Finally questions can be answered in one forum. 1. The"Why" of Native Vegetation: Presented by The Conservation Foundation's Conservation @Home Program a. Deep roots i. Stabilize slopes and reduce erosion ii. Filter impurities b. Design:Both Traditional and Natural c. Create wildlife habitat for desirable species such as birds and butterflies while deterring undesirable species such as geese d. Water i. Save time and money with less water requirements ii. Improve water quality iii. Help control water problems. (Rain Gardens/Rain Barrels) e. When managed are more attractive and less costly than turf grass. f. Native concepts can be implemented in both common areas as well as yards. 2. The"How to's" of Native Vegetation: Presented by Pizzo &Associates,Ltd. - What's involved in managing naturalized open space areas? a. Common problems for Homeowners Associations i. Detention Pond Erosion and Stormwater Control ii. Meeting Regulation Requirements for Naturalized Areas iii. Goose Prevention iv. Weed Control—Chemical methods and Fire. b. Playbook for successful management. i. How do I get started? ii. How do we plan for the future? c. What to expect when using the native solution... i. What does it take to create and implement a plan ii. Process to maturity iii. Costs and comparisons: Budgeting for a successful future \`r�D CITE Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� L Legal ❑ j Finance r-1 sas esT. Engineer El- ., — Tracking Number 4 City Administrator ❑ �y, ' x� a°r, ® Consultant ❑El Eo ( aws - 1-'1-h,0®L Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Off Street Parking Regulations - Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Recommendation Meeting and Date: EDC / October 7, 2008 Synopsis: See attached memo Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: n/a Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Travis Miller Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: C/, Memorandum Jew ® To: EDC From: Travis Miller r$T. 1 1836 CC: Bill Dettmer — Anna Kurtzman O �g Date: September 24, 2008 Subject: Off Street Parking Regulations — Recommended Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Issue• Staff has recently received complaints regarding commercial trucks being parked in business parking lots for extended periods of time. The concern expressed by nearby citizens include nuisances related to the noise of running engines, unsightliness of tractor trailers, and general concern related to the transient nature of the users. Background: The Building and Safety Department in recent years has successfully controlled the use of parking facilities in business districts for tractor trailer parking for extended periods by interpreting this as a use (storage of trucks and trailers) not permitted in Business Districts if this use is not part of the primary use of the property. For instance, there have been tractor trailer parking activities in recent years at the Countryside Center property, the Aldi parking lot, Cozy Comer property none of which is related to the primary use of these properties. A 24 hour period has been used by the Department to determine the point at which an unattended truck and/or trailer must be removed from the property, however, this period has never been incorporated into an ordinance. Staff Recommendation: The draft text amendment clearly identifies the period of time (24 hours) in which a parked vehicle becomes a violation. This amendment addresses commercial vehicles, such as tractor trailers, as well as passenger vehicles, such as for sale vehicles parked in a facility if it is not owned by the property owner, employee or patron. Based on the direction of the Committee, this text amendment would require consideration of and a public hearing conducted by the Plan Commission prior to adoption. 10-11-3: OFF STREET PARKING REGULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS: A. Use Of Parking Facilities: 1. Residential Districts: Off street parking facilities accessory to residential use and development in any residential district in accordance with the requirements of this chapter shall be used solely for the parking of passenger automobiles owned by occupants of the dwelling structures to which such facilities are accessory or by guests of said occupants. Under no circumstances shall required parking facilities accessory to residential structures be used for the storage of commercial vehicles or for the parking of automobiles belonging to the employees, owners, tenants, visitors or customers of business or manufacturing establishments. 2. Business and Manufacturing Districts: Off street parking facilities accessory to business and manufacturing use shall be used solely for the parking of vehicles of owners, employees and patrons of the business or establishment. Vehicles owned by said patrons shall not be parked on said parking facilities for periods longer than twenty-four (24) hours. ,�rFO ClT� Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 00+ Legal ❑ � Finance ❑ esT a 1636 Engineer ❑ 4 --� W City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number O (qtr ', y (J Consultant ❑ E 1) 2 e titiy` ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Zoning Ordinance Update — Steering Committee Formulation and Project Update Meeting and Date: EDC / October 7, 2008 Synopsis: See attached memo Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: n/a Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Travis Miller Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: C/Ty ® Memorandum J a ` kkt ma -n A To: Economic Development Committee esr. 1 1836 From: Charles Wunder CC: Travis Miller .p P p' Date: 9/24/2008 Subject: Zoning Ordinance Update CE Background The United City of Yorkville's current Zoning Ordinance was written in the early 1970's. It determines what uses can be located what areas, how large buildings can be, where they can be located on a lot and how much parking is required, Although the Zoning Ordinance has been amended numerous times over the years there has not been a comprehensive updating and revision process since then. The Zoning Ordinance is one of the city's tools to implement the Comprehensive Plan and guide the city's development. Several of the Comprehensive Plan's implementation actions call for specific changes in the city's land use regulations. Now that we have completed the revision of the Comprehensive Plan it seems that this is an appropriate time to start a comprehensive revision the zoning ordinance. Plan Commission Request At their August 13, 2008 meeting the Plan Commission directed the staff to begin the Zoning Ordinance revision process. It is anticipated that this process will consist of four phases: 1) Assessment of the current zoning ordinance, 2) Strategic determination/Design, 3) Drafting the Ordinance and 4) Adoption. A more detailed list of the anticipated tasks has been attached. The revision will be done by the Community Development Department staff. Steering Committee At their September 10, 2008 meeting the Plan Commission set up a "Steering Committee". It was envisioned that this Steering Committee, consisting of interested "stakeholders", would be smaller and more technically oriented than the Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee. They named the following people to be members of the Steering Committee: : 1 . Plan Commission member, Anne Lucietto 2. Zoning Board of Appeals member, Jeff Baker 3. Building Department representative, Anna Kurtzman 4. Yorkville Police Department representative, Donald Schwartzkopf 5. Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection District representative, Tom Lindblom 6. Yorkville Economic Development Corporation representative, Lynn Dubajic 7. Kendall County Planning Department representative, Jerry Dudgeon 8. Homebuilder's Association representative, Rich Guerard 9. Commercial/industrial developer representative, Tom Van Boekel 10. Green Committee member, Richard Scheffrahn The first meeting of this group is scheduled for November 6, 2008. Zoning Ordinance revision task list ASSESSMENT Review existing zoning ordinance Review new revised Comprehensive Plan Review other city development ordinances Review other and surrounding city's zoning ordinance Interview stakeholders Administrative Department Community Development Department Building Department Engineering Department City Attorney Zoning Board of Appeals Plan Commission City Council Economic Development Commission, Chamber of Commerce Kendall County planning staff Residential developers Homebuilders Association SF MY Big Small Commercial/Industrial Developers Small Commercial project Large Commercial project Industrial Homeowners Associations, Neighborhood groups Identify problems, shortcomings of current zoning ordinance DESIGN STRATEGY Develop goals/objectives of zoning ordinance revision Considerations Form Based zoning vs. traditional zoning Unified Development Ordinance Overlay zones/districts Design Standards What is in the ordinance DRAFT ORDINANCE Organize/Outline new ordinance Draft new ordinance Purpose Administration General Provisions Definitions Zoning Districts Use standards/conditions PUD's Parking Non-conformities Ordinance graphics, diagrams ADOPTION Prepare Zoning Ordinance draft presentation materials-graphics, photos summaries Meet with stakeholders Community Development Department Building Department Engineering Department Zoning Board of Appeals Plan Commission City Council Economic Development Commission, Chamber of Commerce Residential developers Commercial/Industrial Developers Homeowners Associations, Neighborhood groups Revise ordinance draft Distribute ordinance draft Publish public hearing notice for PC Public Hearing at Plan Commission Draft ordinance goes to Economic Development Committee Draft Ordinance goes to City Council `QED Clpy Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number Z) 0�+ Legal ❑ EST 1836 Finance ❑ — Engineer El^� Tracking Number City Administrator ❑ ap Consultant ❑ � �kE d F-1 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Integrated Transportation Plan — Steering Committee Formulation and Project Update Meeting and Date: EDC / October 7, 2008 Synopsis: See attached memo Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: n/a Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Travis Miller Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: EDC From: Travis Miller/Stephanie Boettcher EST < Date: September 25, 2008 o 9 p Subject: ITP Task Force List and Project Update Below is the ITP Task Force list of participants. We have scheduled the first meeting Thursday October 16, 2008 at 4:30 P.M. at the Library Meeting Room. This meeting will serve as an introduction to the Integrated Transportation Plan project which will include a review of the roles and responsibilities of the Taskforce Committee. The Taskforce Committee will also have the opportunity to review the timeline for the project and set the date and time of the next meeting. The Taskforce Committee is expected to meet 4 times throughout the 9 month planning process and each meeting is expected to last 2 homy. The entire process is scheduled to complete midsummer 2009. Integrated Transportation Plan — Taskforce Committee 1 . School District #115 — Brian DeBolt 2. Kendall County Forest Preserve District and Fox River Ecosystem Partnership (FREP) — Jason Pettit 3 . ( 1 -2) Local and Active Developers/Builders - Gary Neyer and Harold Oliver 4. ( 1 -2) Downtown Businesses/Property Owners — Jeff Farren 5 . Chamber of Commerce - Don Duffy 6. Yorkville Parks and Recreation - Dave Mogle 7. YEDC - Lynn Dubajic 8. Chicago Area Mountain Bikers — Russell Rogers 9. Yorkville Bicycle Club — Ben Niles 10. Kendall County — Planning and Highway Department - Jeff Wilkins 11 . IDOT District 3 office - Rick Powell 12. IDNR — Dave Longo Attached are the product of the SEC Group analysis of the multi-use trail system and the downtown streetscape area. LEGEND TRAILS-MAJOR 100 TRAILS-MINOR MEN TRAILS-PRAIRIE PARKWAY ` COMMERCIAL LOCATION BRISTOL BAY ELEMENTARY ( CONNECT TO MONTGOMERY RECREATION LOCATION GAL �y SCHOOL i TRAIL SYSTEM l ! (VIA GORDON ROAD) ���J J REGIONAL SOCCER a - �METRA PARK AND SCHOOL LOCATION / COMPLEX RIDE i �T J � A METRA LOCATION STEVEN G.BRIDGE _ PARK _ ' RAGING WAVES y BRISTOL BAY . _ WATER P JK 16 REGIONAL PARK J 1 VA ■ J " BRISTOL GRAD / J o GRANDE RESERVE POTENTIAL a SCHOOL ELEMENTARY , rr COMMUTER RAIL { � ! SCHOOL h' J J / o� + A A STATION ` l?P A# �! DOWNTOWN ■ €RYA � \ _ OSWEGO.. . ..&',.lr_# Y.M.C.A. KKETPLA `IL"'!1 / MARKETPLACE IF Y A V�Iv_ r A UTUMN RIDGE / J J� SCHOOL e_M I COMMERCIAL !XGj J CONNECTTO J CENTERS VV OSWEGO TRAIL 4b -*-4 � SYSTEM EXISTING / (VIA GROVE ROAD)_ I YORKVILLE J SCHOOL CAMPUS y I J DOWNTOWN •J ' 16161"gk4b k YORKVILLE / V J i J _j J / � ��• 4 YORKVILLE � / 1HOOVER EDUCATION ; O y INTERMEDIATE AND �� LYONS AND RICH a J t _I CENTER _ GRADE SCHOOL / YOUNG FOREST SILVERSPRINGS S J ` PRESERVE J STATE PARK r - f R7 126 J _ � J J YORKVILLE MIDDLE HARRIS FOREST �J ` SCHOOL ` PRESERVE _ CO % EAS EMENT TM EMENT J ■ v��/ �,/ ` .� - a EXAMINE MAJOR NORTH-SOUTH CONNECTION 1 / PROPOSED HIGH ALONG EASTERAN J --SCHOOL STUDY AREA / _-SCHOO ` (VIA HOPKINS ROAD):- _ 1 fJ FUTURE ERESEARENTIj CENTER RESEARCH ', / F ± J /J UX 11 A I ■ a ■ ■ v ■ FUTURE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL CENTER PRAIRIE PARKWAY t o I T wy<CE P'� A- TRAIL CONCEPT PLAN NORTH Swle: 1"=2,000' 1 Yorkville Integrated Transportation United of Yorkvitte 1 2008 LEGEND • J 1 { ,y, j r I / rE.DR RAtEq-a•T Q ,l RAIL ROAD TRACKS y G ARTERIAL STREETS �fJ y' ® w - m r ev piek COLLECTOR STREETS j // // - A'RRO.yyNEAr`D eEEZE o MAJOR STREETS - rJ / / '•�./ LOCAL STREETS BIKE/PEDESTRIAN INTERSECTION MAJOR INTERSECTION I" APPL-E'r T❑: 7 FREEMONT ST >' r W�TdR'*-A•v BLACKBERRY r SCHOOL ROUTE 47 AR'RN_A,v E LIGHTED INTERSECTION CREEK 4..! COMPLEX 1 CORRIDOR CORRIDOR - GATEWAY YORKVLLLE nrNmmyW lr HIGH SCHOOL retlon'" r © PARKINGlACCESS POINT mmexam ronn'ewb a m a R I >4 rmaual -r mru M rmWlxo l J mNavbytiv BbbArry kr+I tra lbWeGWryab 1 I I"WaMbnoMmap " J IEMPPmOCenler� 1 J crrexwmaar $ redmnWl ( 1 mmm lamlx KrvaWJ m "earn ] KEY ELEMENT • Cmrredb&Kx P.:FaN i Cm0 le UIOCian Ww bw relea Mq� ✓ mmmwe Yar ftftm YORKVILLE 1 '(" Ram ei o-aonnxwav J o RIB A'F`B FOCAL POINT FEATURE J mmdmnxe SCHOOL _ Impmvamznn (� Po'.KotWm mma0 CAMPU6 I McHUGH RD w V SCHOOL J K.N..KCKkaAxe 7T ei �J .. 1 j 1 CORRIDOR -'--- 100 YR.FLOODPLAIN(A,A-E) r Imoanam Nmmra —• ° •- PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION lJ jy I' yr Z-- Q�1 J-Jr rrJ-rr.:` wmmarwrano A J -L,yyrrr ---• J JJ' mmPgmwrr...,e J,r w FUTURE RIVERWALK J __---_-. .•_- Evsa�tlAMea MPmdlm - � J —'" . 1 a1Ra" r N "., . PROPOSED TRAIL •n � J <is M1 J1J II_ r 1_ -___ r J,>O(•rR CITY OWNED PROPERTY S n-' 1 1 E�PRIN�s•r— SPRING ST r/ • Pvrwa o-mlemaambP J J J J J J J J j"J`—J- t '4 I I I 1-I--- a '®ENl£ IIJ J r CORRIDO R DOR P r/ EXISTING PARK/OPEN SPACE - PROPOSED PARKIOPEN SPACE J��J J red JE PARK/OPEN SPACE POTENTIAL L.ei PnRrc , ROUTE 47 CORRIDOR PEDESTRIAN J 1 I ACIRCULATION saRKe m YORKVILLE DOWNTOWN CORE AJ ` IKr"uoK YaNVtle adaml - J � _I _' � � r � [rSFHRENS-S.T � HOOVER EDU. CENTER 'I o= 'i— ER }tJ-t.J-J-rrrJ-t'r+d?rJ-J-,>• Y' ,. I O • • 'e o `OOPEN SPACE ISLANDS pPORTLINITY CWVWG¢d ball etiaq - I I F i • OPEX CE EPA wxl ebn IM1e Fw Rrrer f ¢;" STnIE OPPCRMIRY K V ) W f3 PPOPERi apm oMU WdrvVMlba ,-,��r� IXganwn"ecYO" PLAN . Af O I pQp pVVWalh Palontlolb aawnlamr PLAM 9 VIEW STATE STATE PdmWIMII Ln-a3a wnvli9 BRNITAflY , RIVERWALK w °.fE"TM PUNA \ CORRIDOR i I g �� PROPEalr PF` r _,.... . r. _�- `ilox • • J J/ PunuetdNNwaxrcPxed �...I.r.r�i�rL�yrrr � • P aamAe. 1 I CANOE/KAYAK • a yd� •.•.. . . fn IwgwMake 1 1 ^ '{ OPEN SPACE • a , _ a IN r m N aa.aa w r r J J _ CHUTE o PORTUNNY � a .,.:. naruau Ye b s r 1 Fuoi rtvrmP mh r•Lrsrald° aJ$I- P + a r r aalo>vmb's pN ��a r PITT r s r T H+4 E§kluYA9 a I -4 1 PNSO1maWxm mu R _ 1 i m Pem re RM1dmIPnNmmb FAX rc ^ CIVIC H',•r liu v{-r.n E rL -J J J 1YC91RONT PART: °.am9 W+ham=1rw"a RIVER •"' J COMPLEX n� I '� I``••� •j J . m J w�mmawlyanau � � � I view � � \ J p6v baamneaM ��� / A s�IILmIXCavmppmml -�'�i�l, j J J BUfl1.IN0iON }}4 J opparlunleee a �1 - x J VAN EMMON H L NORTHER �� J - • 1 1• ��r/°r-� u+uen� � J w SILVER DOWNTOWN ^rr� trr jrr, rt J I --�^f-''a '•� '���---'11),: e r r -+ � � T I t J SPRINGS c8urimouM.LL Ir' PQe CORw J i rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr rrttfJ fj J Kevwmewaa rma w Flo E-y.T 14 w r J r J Ha".ar Ee em,d cam<r -- c" mem a IoPaml aXmerspr'rgasmm e { e apwnaN:a J Pax mao'.mla.a n ` ).• � ImpmW Nmuappogxn J a` J .rJ" `• • ` MILL ST ,` J COM-ED VAN EMMON s` o CORRIDOR J EASEMENT ci RD CORRIDOR j, I aN� q J. n Il I vallmala arm elo , • eYnarmm e4nmeemmraeaarar .. h<q� 1 1„a' .Y z_^ '� I ( I �r scram."areea.rral rm anmrmaomnmm ( I•� �e n / J aaloneomaaaa " J re�v�„IL�aanml �AWtt' ........_.!- 1... • ' camnu w.mxxaar✓sauv Opp` Wa° y�?o ANALYSIS - DOWNTOWN AREA NORTH Scale: 1'=240' 5EC' Group,Inc. Yorkville Transportation Plan I United of Yorkvitte Da 118 n n u !' ILLINOIS PRAIRIE PATH-AURORA !t BRANCH !( A AN !! REEGIONAGONA L T TRAIL OF r !! 1 1L Cl Z"r OpC OO C �'C� l OO vl MN OF ii � GaMG10�Ea II n X11 I9i]' Uffi CIF OII VILLAGE OF (j 11 MONTGOMERY 00 77 ice_ ,,,,� �0 TRAILS /y GIO RIVER 1 � ;cam .. _ _ ? I/. REGIONAL T=qIL TIT - u y w pp if — II VlL'GEOF / `,-P I I ; j i 4 ,,.( OSWEGO TRAILS e � I .r� y�� I �w'N S `6 OFP O TRAILS g,lC MMILLGB - SN}� J �l�✓/U/'I�{U I p 11�2 VILLAGE OF e IPILL S P; 11 1 ` i , ve�1�r+�lO�I�IT'IV V,aqUy y Sg IS i / x \ ^ _ OSWEG-OTRAIL_S FUUTRA irr v aL F px S a — � f� =fniOOOw — �r' IL , Ly I I \ .— - - _ 11 n per p o � T � = t _ .s=s_� MIDOLEAUXSABL CREEK CORRIGOR ULLJ I I fLF A .:'-ff1f9R kS 19M -' REGICNALP1 TR TRgIL CE I I CEO C/r` REGIONAL TRAILS EXHIBIT NORTN Scale'. 1'=3,000 SEC Group,Inc. Yorkville Integrated Transportation Plan I United City of Yorkville •. 11' r - 3 i LEGEND 0 \ ' ' ay, _� �♦C,C YORKVILLE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY O' US:RT-;--30- STUDY AREA \ r ��_� ��cs9�� ��` ` OSWEGO MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY MONTGOMERY MUNICIPAL BOUND PLANO MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY MILLBROOK MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY _ r PLATTVILLE BOUNDARY F ZONE AE FLOODPLAIN I ZONE A FLOODPLAIN ..{�\ �l ' r �I'i�• mid'. i____ 500 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ENVIRONMENTAL CORRIDORS u _ 7 • `r� CITY PARKS F'• ' � I�a STATE PARKS Y �nn 1 2 r �� r � � �'—' FOREST PRESERVE �. ` EXISTING SCHOOL to ¢ FUTURE SCHOOL LOCATIONS �' WI ! 9 , ' =CJs T OT LANG u i = �y sir -' VILLAGE OSWEI US: RT. 34 - ' / r E COO TRYSIDE PKWY �M UNITED CITY ER „ DF YORKVILLE IIIII PC IC Wr 126 FD I O _ I / AMENT'RD RD M __ _ _ �- P a 0= Z I ¢ sue= --' 5 o y ^� I �' ¢ WALKER RD I x i II J - -4b_�_ a_a_ CI ZI a 1 � I ■ - - y FARM An Ito FAR ; p I I i fl, PROPOS PRAIRIE PARKWAY\. ELBA RDA_ _�_ _ "_J 1 � NEWARK RD 1 x 9 PLATT 1 D P STUDY AREA ANALYSIS NORTA Scale: 1"=2,000' Yorkville SEC Group, Inc. Integrated Transportation .j.........L \ I ID LEGEND = .:. ;. LEGEND RANKS. URCELLPARK _///��� e ;o>r°"� ♦/� . _'= YORKVILLE STUDY AREA I' 2, FO%HILL EASTPARK } .. / •A� / Al , , 3, FOX HILL WEST PARK (,�a • r °•e.... a EXISTING SCHOOL LOCATIONS A. NIGIN65ESSERPA ��US. RT. 30-- 5, EMILYSLPOTPPPAK ` $ s. rSI NSGUAREPaRK �:;/ + ,� o u _ ✓' ® FUTURE SCHOOL LOCATIONS ]. BEECXER PARK S. EMMON PARK I` I L� • / _ 'r .L � yf )l s 9. PARN \ ±F 11 5 t ff �y ® PARK ID 0, RIVERFRONT PARN _ K. IS PARK / A 12. RIGEPn1U( a _ _ -°- cEH 'I t3. WECT HYDRAULIC PARK TRAILS 15. CRAWFORDPARK T- ♦' -♦ CITY OWNED/MAINTAINED ASPHAL t6, 3UNFLOWERPARK - L. , r� r�yAJ : Lp�- I - _ 1 C NNONBALL RIDGE PARK 1 }h '�Y- �in� II T ♦ g`F,' COUNTY TRAIL 15 GILSERTPARK •F I\ \ R s ?a, , °°°°° IN DEVELOPER PUD AGREEMENT 9. ROTARYPARK — Y_ , 4 ]0. WHISPERING MEADOWS PARK 21 HOOVER SOL ArIONP CENTER u -T _ , } ` ♦ ` a >s PRIVATE/PU BLIC TRAIL WA) -ow a22, JAYCEE FOND — j ry r 23, CODE PAW • ♦ r 1- pRVATEl PUBLIC TRAIL/NOWT-Fmmlme 24 JAYCEEENELAGE PARKA 2$. STEVEN G BRIDGE PARR ...... .0 J- I R I ' 25, STEPPING STONES PARK T o° z — _ _ I r� °--- PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL n, WHEATON WOOS _ _ M ADTUMNCREEKPARKA ❑ — �i ^" '�~ \ L^- g TRAILS OUTSIDE OF YORKVILLE 29. RIEMwscXNEIOER PaRN a ♦ xs y -°-- FUTURE NTERNAL(pM.ulwNl=In1IIW) _0. GRANDE RESERVE PARKA _ 9�� ITtF '1 S1 ORANOE RESERVE PARKB Z 'tL " J�' �, "L 32. HEARTLANDCIRCLE PARK - _ J p.f" 'L— LOCAL PARKS/FOREST PRESERVES FOREST PRESERVES aN ■ , a®9ss R ,� �1� 23 KENDALLCOUNIYFDNFSTPRESERVE - _ Z R a - ? CITY PARKS 3C. KENDALL COUNryFOREST PRESERVE Js. sUBATFORESTPRESERVE W �J - `�, j` '1 �I STATE PARKS SO LYONS FORESTPRESERV=_ 3r. DICK YOUNG FOREST PRESERVE --+° � `�' _US FOREST PRESERVE 30 HARPS FOREST PRESERVE O 7 F. "'�` O 1 ft sraTE PARKS N - ��♦± i w HOOVER EDUCATIONAL CENTER 39 SLYER SPRINGS STATE PARK • f SCHOOLS A YORKVILLE HIGH SCHOOL f B. YORRVILLEHIGHSCHOOLFRESHMON C4MPU5 f1e L. - G VOI VILE NTERMEDIATESCHOOL 114 , • K, ` ,�yy 6" 1 { D. CIRCLE CENTER GRADE SCHOOL E. YORKVILEE GRADE SCHOOL F GPANDERESERVEELRIENTARYSCXDOL 6. BRISTOL 54Y ELEMENTARY SCHOOL J 171 A '� - /i ♦ p♦ l ' H. BRIStOLGRA0E 5CNOOL _ • t Q�" H I. NEW YORKV4.LEMIDDLESCHODL ,r^9J 6 4 F L. \ C. K' T- w ._ \ • ny �_ � C TEL 1�j A1TI�YSIT�c TrWY ' C\' L _s '/ ; I 4 ♦ z ` r L; 0 "�' 7 3 a _ LI _ff_ _ A. c - , 1$1 I I"`�� VAS 71 t A 3r [❑� ♦ k - .l - X114-II 1 _I L \ . Y L�SISf✓j_� 11� s• .e� Ya _� • � QO � _3♦ r ire AG x.-�!��. JS,K� �L Y 1T � � �i �'�• Hy�ulnpppj ��. -I — � 3� vQ r � � �V n �, ry�I�. i o v 1 ,,3 SAS • a ♦ L �Q,Nrj - : 0 4,$y .y _ �+,' _--'�i ��Y ,'a lt�nv3 �`-'1f.♦' �P���'i �/ , � ... te' S � - / , ♦ yyii G'�E11�, r't��- I IL. i •� JL OVA �/ m - u • ti+ I I� e- - . �� I g I—,, � \ I . , \ rte: - z �i. -: iao____L_____ —� �� � T L \ A. _ ♦ I �7I _ E , . II��� III J��• sOa-° — — ;`�� I— r —�. RD— _ / 1 J — ♦ JA— -� �\ VJ -�.,�,_ -I z� 'i _� - »> WALKER a-"7d 1 .�.�.= II . F I❑ � I � �1 �/' �II I v � � �I I _ae TL m _ � i� _ \ —� _ '� l si 6ATOFAIM RD � I — '- - _ L P PROPOSED PRAIRIE PARKWAY _ — — — fl I — - - - ❑_ — tu PLA TV LEY �.- —T _ l I L� SHARED - USE TRAIL MAP NORTH S.R 1"=2,000' SEC Group, Inc. Yorkville Integrated Transportation Plan I United City of Yorkville Date: September 16,2008 Monthly Status Report YORKVILLE INTEGRATED TRANSPORTATION PLAN Shared Use Trail Masterplan and Downtown Streetscape Plan October 1, 2008 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Client/Project United City of Yorkville/Integrated Transportation Plan SEC Job No. 080389-YORK PROJECT TEAM: Yorkville Lead/Project PM Travis Miller/Stephanie Boettcher-United City of Yorkville Principal in Charge Jason Poppen-SEC Group Project Manager Phil Stuepfert-SEC Group Transportation Engineers Glenn Tredinnick/Tony Simmons-SEC Group PROJECT STATUS ESTIMATED % DATE TO TASK COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY COMPLETE NOTES A.DATA COLLECTION& ANAYLSIS Collect Data 100% SEC 8-06-08-com lete Info provided by Ste hanie(FTP) -Met with Greg Weber 7-23-08 Kickoff meeting(1) 100% SEC/Yorkville 7-31-08-complete Site visits (2) 100% SEC/Yorkville Complete 1. Phil S. on September 4,2008 2. Travis M., Stephanie B., Lama H.,Tony S. & Phil S. 9-16-08 Various site visits have occurred to date and will continue to occur throughout the process on a as-needed basis Basernap,and Acrial Exhibit 100% SEC Complete Site Analysis Exhibits 100% SEC Complete Final Drafts complete-minor revisions may be neeeded B.PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT, COORDINATION& PARTNERSHIP Stakeholder interviews and/or 75% SEC/Yorkville End of project 1. YEDC on 8-13-09 meetings with other organizations 2. Chamber of Commerce on 8-21-08 3. Kendall County on 9-3-08 SHC Graup,tna. Z'\2008\090389-YORK\Adminietrarive\Meeting Minutes Agendas&Status Report\STATUS REPORTS\3 Intee ared Transportation Plan-Status report-Oct 12008.doc Page I of Stakeholder interviews continued 4. Kendall County Forest Preserve on 9-3-08 (8 total meetings) 5. Downtown Business owners on 9-30-08 6. Meeting with IDOT-date TBD 7. Meeting with Openlands-date TBD 8. TBD Travis Miller to contact adjacent municipalities (Plano, Montgomery, Oswe o,Millbrook) Task Force Committee meetings(4) 0% SEC/Yorkville #1) 10-16-08 #1)To be held on October 16` , 2008 #2)TBD #2) #3)TBD #3) #4)TBD #4) TASK FORCE 10% SEC/Yorkville 1. School District#115 1.Brian Dubolt accepted 2. Kendall County Forest Preserve 2.Jason Petite accepted District - 3. (1-2)Local and Active 3.Gary Neyer-Richard Marker Associates accepted Developers/Builders Harold Oliver accepted 4. (1-2)Downtown 4.TBD following 9-30-08 meeting Businesses/Property Owners Jeff Farren has accepted 5. Chamber of Commerce 5.Don Duffy accepted 6.Yorkville Parks and Recreation 6.Dave Mogle and/or Scott Sleezer to represent 7.YEDC 7.Lynn Dubajec accepted 8. Illinois League of Bicyclists 8.Ed Barsotti/Jessica Thompson-in progress 9. Conservation Foundation and/or Fox 9.Cons.Found.-Stephanie Sheets contacted-declined but is River Ecosystem Partnership(FREP) willing to meet individually to provide input 10. Kendall County-Planning and FREP-Jason Petitt will serve as their representative Highway Department 10.Jeff Wilkins contacted again-awaiting reply 11.IDOT District 3 office 11.Rick Powell accepted 12.IDNR 12.Dave Longo(local representative)accepted - Loren Wobig(Kyak Chute)and Dick Westphall(Trails) 13.Yorkville City Council 13.All are invited 14. Openlands 14.Ders Anderson and Openlands has agreed to meet - individually but cannot be on the task force 15. Chicago Area Mountain Bikers 15.Russel Rogers accepted Define Vision Statement, Goals, 90% SEC/Yorkville 9-12-08 Preliminary draft complete with staff comments-will be revised Objectives er ublic comment throughout the process Community Survey 100% SEC 8-8-08 draft Survey is currently online-collecting results Final completed by 8-29-08 SEC Group,Inc. Z:\2008\080389-YORK\Admini,trative\Meeting Minutea Agendas&Status Reports\STATUS REPORTS\3 Integrated Transportation Plan-Status report-Oct 12008.doc Page 2 of4 Public Workshop (2) 0% SEC/Yorkville 1)Nov/Dec Exact dates and times TBD 2)June 2009 Project Newsletter(4)-quarterly 25% SEC # 1) 8-29-09 #1)First newsletter completed for Hometown days #2)Dec `08 #3)April `09 #4)Aug`09 Final Public Meetings (2) 0% SEC/Yorkville 1)July 2009 2)Aug 2009 C.PRIORITIZATION, IMPLEMENTATION& FUNDING STRATEGIES Prioritization,Phasing, 30% SEC Ongoing Initial discussions with staff complete on key connections and Implementation and Funding priority areas. Major and minor trails have been identified on the Strategies Trail Concept Analysis based on priority of importance Master Phasing Plan—Shared Use 10% SEC Aug 2009 Map being setup and drafted-to be modified through the process Trail D.CONCEPTUAL PLANNING SUBTASK 1 SHARED-USE TRAIL SYSTEM DESIGN Conceptual Guidelines and Standards 15% SEC Aug 2009 Beginning to setup template for standards to be determined Research is being completed Shared Use Trail Master Plan 75% SEC Aug 2009 Overall map drafted-will be modified through the process Trail Concept Analysis has been completed identifying major and minor corridors as mentioned above Recommendations for Phasing 0% SEC Aug 2009 Improvements, Design and Construction Specs Signage and wayfmding theme and 5% SEC Ongoing- Collecting data and representative photographs have been taken concept Complete Aug to be utilized for Signage and wayfinding theme 2009 Preliminary cost estimates 0% 1 SEC I Aug 2009 SUBTASK 2—DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE PLAN Task 1 —Downtown Pedestrian Analysis Downtown Streetscape Master Plan 5% SEC Aug 2009 First step of Concept Analysis is complete-templates being created for master plan Pedestrian System Analysis 25% SEC Au 2009 Initial analysis complete-Final plan to be drafted in the future r,SEC Group,Inc. Z:\2008\080389-YORK\A4miniSh tive\Meeting Minutes Agendas&Status ReportASTATUS REPORTS\3 Integrated Transportation Plan-Status report-Oat 1 2008.doc Page 3 of 4 Typical street sections 10% SEC Aug 2009 Templates are drafted-to be modified through the process Diagrams demonstrating safety 5% SEC Aug 2009 Data collection and research in progress-templates being created treatments (5) Narrative(to be inserted in final 0% SEC Aug 2009 report) Task 2—Design Standards for Streetsca a Elements Design Standards for Streetscape 5% SEC Aug 2009 Research started and collecting information Elements(Diagrams and Text) Theme and Character Study 10% SEC Aug 2009 Collecting data and representative photographs have been taken of the Yorkville area to determine character elements-to be utilized for the theme study E.FINAL REPORT Text Document 0% SEC Aug 2009 UWANDIATE STEPS/ACTION ITEMS TO COMPLETE BY SEC GROUP • Finalize Task Force Committee members and preparation for first meeting • Begin drafting initial concept ideas and templates to be utilized in the process INFORMATION TO BE PROVIDED BY YORK«T_F OR TASKS TO BE COMPLETED • Assisting with preparation for the Oct 16`s Task Force meeting r,SEC Group,Inc. Z:\2008\080389-YORK\AdminiMativeWeefing Minutes Agendas&Status Repotts\STATUS REPORTS\3 Integrated Tean,.rution Plan-Status report-Oct 12008,doc Page 4 of CIPP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� T Legal ❑ g O EST. 7836 Finance ❑ Engineer E]En -�� � Tracking Number 10 C� y City Administrator ❑ ®9 m n�, ®�O Consultant ❑ E I) C a O )g - L19 1,E ®�'� ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Proposed Economic Development Committee 2009 Meeting Schedule Meeting and Date: EDC - October 7, 2008 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Committee Approval Submitted by: Meghan Gehr Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum esr. _.,_ 1836 To: Economic Development Committee A, From: Meghan Gehr, Administrative AssistantM°'"" ®� p CC: Brendan McLaughlin, City Administrator Date: October 1 , 2008 �<LE i�°®O Subject: 2009 Meeting Schedule The Clerk's Office is in the process of publishing the City's master meeting list for 2009. Listed below is a tentative schedule for the Economic Development Committee meetings for 2009. Please discuss this schedule at the October 7, 2008 Economic Development Committee meeting and let me know if these dates meet with your approval. It is important that the meeting schedule be approved now so that 2009 dates for the Administrative Adjudication hearings can be scheduled. Thank you! Economic Development Committee V Tuesday — 7:00 Pm January 6 July 7 February 3 August 4 March 3 September 1 April 7 October 6 May 5 November 3 June 2 December 1