Loading...
Plan Commission Packet 2008 09-10-08 C'ED C/T� � United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST. -1 ; � 1636 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 9 Al r� Fax: 630-553 -7575 <4E PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA Wednesday, September 10, 2008 City Council Chambers 800 Game Farm Road Meeting Called to Order: 7:00 p.m. Roll Call: Previous Meeting Minutes: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Hearings: Requested by Petitioners This item was continued,from the August 13, 2008 Plan Commission meeting. 1 . PC 2008-18 Richard Marker Associates, Inc., petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting a special use from B-3 Service Business District to Special use for a drive through. The real property consists of 5. 131 acres, located at 728 E. Veterans Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois, 60560. Action Items i. Special Use 2. PC 2008-19 Urness Land Company, petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting annexation and rezoning from Kendall County B-3 Business District to Planned Unit Development zoning. The real property consists of approximately 2 acres, located at 9316 Route 34, Yorkville, Illinois, 60560. Action Items i. Annexation ii. Zoning New Business: 1 . PC 2008-21 Loren Miller, petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting a Mile and 1/2 Review. The real property consists of approximately .753 acres, currently zoned Kendall County A- 1 agricultural and zoning being sought is M- 1 limited manufacturing district. Action Items i. Mile and ''/z review Additional Business 1 ) Cannonball Trail PUD Amendment Discussion — Request for City Council Response 2) Steering Committee make-up for Zoning Ordinance Adjournment Plan Council D August 28,2008 Attendees: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Stephanie Boettcher, Senior Planner Jackie Dearborn, Civil Engineer Travis Miller,Director of Comm.Development Sgt. Don Schwartzkipf,Yorkville Police Anna Kurtzman,Zoning Coordinator Eric Dhuse,Director of Public Works Dave Mogle,Director of Parks and Recreation Guests: Dan Kramer,Kramer Law Offices Jim Koziol,Koziol Engineering Mason Oliver,IIRM Properties Bob Pilmer,Pilmer and Barnhart Don Burks,Property Owner Loren Miller,Property Owner The meeting was called to order at 9:00 am by Joe Wywrot. August 14, 2008 minutes were approved subject a spelling correction of McHugh Road on page 2. Star European Imports—Annexation and PUD Mr. Kramer indicated that the petitioner is requesting P.U.D zoning;not B-3 zoning. This correction will be made to the preliminary geometric plan. Also,Mr. Miller requested that the petitioner provide a statement indicating the change in the engineering consultant from the original listed on the application to Koziol Engineering. The petitioner has contacted IDOT in regards to the proposed land dedication shown on the preliminary plan; however the petitioner has not received any information from IDOT about this issue. The preliminary plan shows a 20' dedication running the length 183.66' from the western property line and a 4' dedication running the length of 150.06' from the eastern property line. This dedication is drawn to match the right of way dedications of the properties to the east and west. It was indicated by Mr. Wywrot that the petitioner needs to double check this dedication with IDOT, as they will have final say. Mr. Koziol spoke to the potential for sanitary sewer service on site. He stated that from the building's floor elevation to nearest invert there is a coverage depth of 6 ft. However, once sewer service was run from this invert to the property there would be about 3 ft of coverage. Mr. Koziol suggested that it would be better to do a forced sewer main from the property to west. However, there is a coverage issue with this option as well. Mr. Wywrot indicated the petitioner should continue to pursue securing offsite utility easements, and that the smallest coverage amount the City allowed was 3.5 ft, so this could be doable. The petitioner is to contact John Frerich of Deuchler Associates in regards to the sanitary sewer issues and recommended coverage. Mr. Miller questioned if the petitioner was committing to annex to YBSD. Mr. Oliver indicated that it was dependent on cost. The petitioner does not want to spend a lot of money on securing easements and would like to keep the option open for having septic service onsite. Mr. Wywrot indicated that if the petitioner would like to keep septic service that the preliminary site plan would have to be altered to include a septic field. If the petitioner was to pursue running the sanitary sewer main to the east, they would have to secure easements to do so. However, running a forced sewer main would allow the petitioner to take advantage of the existing easement. Mr. Miller suggested that if the City would allow a forced main that the petitioner would utilize this option until improvements are made to McHugh at which time the petitioner would hook into this system. Mr. Wywrot indicated that gravity is always preferred, which would mean utilizing the McHugh Road sewer main. He still would like the petitioner to pursue securing easements to the east to McHugh. If a forced main is used, it would have to be determined if the pump station would be private or public. Mr. Dhuse indicated that a private pump station would be preferred, however Mr. Wywrot noted that if the retail building develops and there a multiple property owners and multiple buildings that the pump station might fall into the public realm. Mr. Wywrot indicated that if the petitioner was to use septic, that would have to submit a new site plan and ultimately the retail building shown would have to be removed to place a septic field. Mr. Kramer stated they have spoke to the petitioner about having sanitary service and that sanitary would be preferred as a septic field would take away valuable land for development. Mr. Wywrot brought up the stormwater management onsite. Mr. Koziol stated that the basin would be a wet bottom basin in which the pond would not release when there was '/4 inch or less in rain. The bottom would be a naturalized area and the rain would feed this vegetation. Mr. Wywrot question if the space provided was enough for the site and that the issue would have to be resolved as soon as possible. Ms. Dearborn questioned about the parking lot lighting and that if lighting will be within the parking islands. Also, that the site plan shows wall packs which are discouraged by the City's dark sky ordinance. Mr. Oliver stated that the petitioner will be placing lighting in these islands. Ms. Dearborn identified that the petitioner has added a proposed access easement on the plan, but that it should also state that it is a cross access easement and others are able to go access and travel across the property. Mr. Kramer questioned if the City was provided with a similar easement from the property to the west and cautioned if not, the easement could become a one- way street. Ms. Dearborn is to provide Mr. Kramer with a copy of the agreement for this property (Shops at Veteran's Parkway). Mr. Wywrot questioned if want to provide a physical connection to the property to the west and if there was a need for this. Staff is to determine if this property has a cross access easement and if so where it is located. Ms. Boettcher addressed the excess of parking spaces that are shown on the site plan, and suggested that the petitioner look into removing the spaces along the east and west property line in order to conform to the side yard requirements. Mr. Wywrot also noted that the plan doesn't conform to the parking lot setback, and this will most likely be a deficiency of the property. Additional landscaping may be requested because of this and should be addressed in the annexation agreement. The petitioner is requested to submit a concept/preliminary landscape plan as a part of the annexation agreement. Mr. Miller asked the petitioner about the parking and the reduction of the parking. Mr. Koziol stated that he would not have a problem with removing these spaces and that reducing spaces may also help the potential stormwater issue on the property. Mr. Kramer suggested working some flexibility into the agreement to allow for additional parking in the future. Mr. Miller addressed that the City is concerned about the storing of vehicles in need of repair. Mr. Oliver did state that shop mostly does minor repair. It was agreed that some amount of reduction of parking would be provided. Ms. Dearborn identified that the petitioner may need to move the location of one or both handicapped spaces for the dealership in order for them to be closer to the sales area. Mr. Kurtzman noted that the ADA accessibility code dictates where the parking stalls shall be located. She stated that the door to the sales area would most likely be the ADA accessible as opposed to the service entrance. Mr. Oliver identified that if they moved the handicapped stall, this would eliminate up to 4 spaces out of the 5 spaces by the show room. Even if there is a reduction in the number of spaces to 35, the petitioner will still need 2 handicapped spaces. If the petitioner does this, they would want to keep parking along the east property line. However, if the petitioner was able just to remove the parking along the west property line, or if the petitioner was able to split the handicapped spaces, in which one would stay where it is currently shown on the plan and the other would move by the sales floor, they may be more amenable to the reduction in parking on the east side. Mr. Oliver stated that he would like to speak to the property owner about the traffic volume of their existing business. Other parking configurations, such as parallel and angled parking were also suggested. Ms. Kurtzman noted that since the petitioner is requesting PUD zoning there are requirements for PUD submittal which the petitioner needs to catch up with. Also, a list will have to be formulated of the deviations from the code to include in the annexation agreement. Mr. Miller requested that a sign program be submitted with the PUD application. Ms. Kurtzman noted that the City passed a new sign ordinance and the petitioner should look at this. Also, the petitioner should make mention on the engineering plans that approval of those plans does not permit approval of the sign shown. Sign approval goes through a separate approval process. Ms. Dearborn questioned about the display area, if the curb will be keep as it is shown on the site plan. There needs to be clarification if there will be a curb to provide a raised display area or not. A resubmitted site plan is not necessary as staff will address the issues in their comments. This will move forward to Plan Commission on September 1 oth, EDC on October 7th, and City Council on October 28th Burks Brothers Subdivision — Preliminary Plat Mr. Wywrot indicated that IDOT will need to approve the plat and that IDOT has requested that approximately a 5 ' right of way be conveyed. He noted that IDOT has typically asked for a separate lot to be conveyed to them. Mr. Pilmer mentioned that IDOT was not interested in purchasing the property. However, the potential right of way still needs to be shown either as a separate lot or as part of the other lots (lot 1 and 2). Mr. Wywrot stated that whatever the petitioner works out with IDOT on how the right of way to be conveyed is shown on the plat is fine with the City. Ms. Boettcher addressed that the property to the north of Lot 4 is a residential zone. Should this lot redevelop it will need to conform to the landscape ordinance which currently requires a 30' buffer yard between a business zone and a residential zone. Currently, the storage units on this lot will be considered a pre-existing non conforming use. Ms. Kurtzman addressed that the building setback line for the front yard of each lot shall be provided on the plat. Also, the petitioner needs to identify what shall be considered a front yard for lot 3 and lot 4 as they do not have street frontage. It was determined that the eastern lot line shall be considered the front yard. A 50' front yard shall be provided. For lot 1 and lot 2, 50' shall be measured from the proposed IDOT right of way. Petitioner shall not have a problem meeting these requirements. Ms. Boettcher also requested that the petitioner provide a sidewalk running parallel to Route 47. The petitioner questioned when the appropriate time to provide this sidewalk was. Mr. Wywrot noted that it is logical to place the walk in at this time, sooner as opposed to later. When Route 47 widens, IDOT will be responsible for replacing the sidewalk. The petitioner mentioned that the property to the south (Prairie Gardens) is missing approximately 30' of sidewalk from the Burks property going south. This will cause a gap in the connection from the Prairie Gardens property into the proposed sidewalk on the Burks property. Staff is to look into this along with the proper alignment of the sidewalk. Petitioner is to at least have sidewalk bonded for in order to have plat of subdivision recorded. Ms. Kurtzman addressed that a 10' easement was previously recorded on the property along the front of the property and was not reflected on the plat. Ms. Kurtzman was wondering if the 25 ' utility easement shown on the plat supersedes this 10' easement or if this 25 ' easement is in addition to original 10' easement. The petitioner is to verify that the 25 ' easement is superseding the 10' easement shown on previous plats. The petitioner is to provide the easement document numbers to the plat. Ms. Kurtzman mentioned that signage is only allowed on property which has street frontage. Mr. Miller noted that it will be necessary for the lots to share signage, in which an access easement shall be provided on the plat for maintenance of the sign. The petitioner mentioned there is existing signage and that lot I has its own signage, while lots 2-4 share a sign on lot 2. The sign on lot 2 will have an easement allowing lot 3 and lot 4 to access it, which shall be shown on the plat. Mr. Miller inquired if the petitioner would like to submit final plat and preliminary plat in conjunction as it is typically easier for the public participation phase. The petitioner will like to proceed in this manner, so preliminary plat approval will be withdrawn from the September 10'h Plan Commission. The petitioner will modify the preliminary plat and submit a final plat, which will be brought back to plan council. Following this, it will go onto Plan Commission. Loren and Rhonda Miller — Mile and Y2 Review Ms. Dearborn addressed that staff was concerned the property did not have any street frontage and it may be necessary to have an easement to the parcel. The petitioner stated that the parcel does have a legal easement with Star Mercedes who runs a business out of the parcel adjacent to the subject property. The petitioner owns both the subject property and the parcel on which Star Mercedes runs its business. The petitioner runs a body shop on the subject property, instead of continuing to have a non-conforming use on the property; the petitioner would like to rezone the property to County M- 1 in order for the body shop use to be in conformance with the zoning. The petitioner is not changing the use on the property. Mr. Miller questioned if the petitioner would consider combining the subject property with the parcel where Star Mercedes sits, as the petitioner owns both parcels, as combining the two parcels would alleviate some of the setback issues with the subject property. The petitioner indicated that while that is possible, as it currently sits there would be two separate parcels which he could sell off. Due to this, he would like to keep the parcels separate. Mr. Miller explained the procedure of a mile and '/z review to the petitioner and while the two parcels are currently both owned by the petitioner, it is the City' s task just to review the subject property and how that property could develop given the M- 1 zoning. Ms. Boettcher identified that given the situation; the county could address it as a pre-existing non conforming use. However, since the petitioner is rezoning the subject property, he made need to provide buffering. Mr. Miller indicated that staff would recommend that buffering would be provided on the subject property either in the form of a fence or landscaping in conformance with the City's landscape requirements, but ultimately this decision will be made by the county. The petitioner stated that the front yard shall be considered north of the building, which was agreed to by staff as the easement running to the property comes from the north. Ms. Kurtzman addressed that the petitioner's worst case scenario is that the building is determined a legal non-conforming use. This means that owner would be allowed to continue to use the building until the property is destroyed or changes are made to the building. This status will not change anything to the petitioner's current business. Mr. Miller questioned if the petitioner had considered annexation into the City as the current municipal boundary is the parcel's southern property line. The petitioner has not considered this option and since no utility services are relatively close to the subject property the petitioner would like to remain in the County. Ms. Kurtzman questioned the petitioner about the plat stating the according to County records the triangle shaped piece in the northwest area of the parcel is not a part of the county's description. The County records for the parcel' s PIN number show a parcel without this piece. The petitioner should work with the County to clean up this discrepancy as the plat provided to staff along with the supporting legal description show this part included in the property. Staff also suggested to the petitioner that the easement from the Star Mercedes parcel to his parcel be shown on the plat. This request will be on the September 10th Plan Commission agenda. Minutes submitted by Stephanie Boettcher tin cr,, United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road E' _ '°% Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 .2 Fax: 630-553-7575 CE r PC # .�60 K - I. APPLICATION & PETITION ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST Development Name: NLARTLAND CENrkCR Date of Submission: 5-*'12-08 Requesting: [] Annexation [] Zoning [] Planned Unit Development Special Use: DRWZ: TNR a WAAC 1. Name of Petitioner(s): XIGNARD /'UgkGR 1.56UAMS. bir,. Address: 65y NF.4Rrt.AMD DRWE Phone Number: 630-•S53 -3322 Fax Number: K30- 5.53 5736 Email Address: G+M�xrkec Mc. rker* 1c. .C.om Relationship of Petitioner(s) to subject property: [] Owner XDeveloper [] Contract Purchaser 2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from #1: If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: (DAK BRooic BANK rQLur $23191 BLrdFFICIARY' Zer1ACO /iARKIR &;-'6Ci&'rV AAL 3. a). (i). Sttreet address and physical location of subject property: 72 A'. yET RAN A3XwAY (ii). Zoning of surrounding parcels: North: R:-J% RAD South: B3 PAD East: yR3 ?LW West: DJ R 1 - b). Legal description of property, attach as Exhibit "A". c). Total Acreage: �5.1 ?1 Act-Q-5 d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of property: 02-29- 2Q -OIL e). Current Zoning Classification: �J'-3 R.XD f). Zoning Classification Requested: CoND1,TI0NAL USE FoR �a►vf TNQa g). Is this property within City limits? -')-Yes No, requesting annexation Page I of United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 1128106 4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners and landowners within 500' entitled to notice of petition under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: Attach a separate list and label as Exhibit "B". 5. List all governmental entities or agencies required to receive notice under Illinois law: r&KVILLZ (obmmlatJ iy? S None, blimlex #115' 3 VAITTOL ICeND4LL FIRc Ae4>zTMLrAir, �&QrUtur B9Is7a. &NilA.Vi? DiSTRICr 6. List the Illinois Business Tax Number (IBT#) for the State of Illinois and names of businesses located on subject property to be annexed: 7. Does a flood plain exist on the subject property? NO 8. Do Electors reside on the subject property? N 0 If so, they must execute this petition to annex. (Electors as defined by Illinois Law is a resident of the parcel who is a registered voter. Legal owners of the annexing parcel must sign the petition regardless of place of residence or legal voting status.) 9. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: Gam+ore (11okrue.r 6541 Y/cARTLkN*p -pmyr 6630- 5:53° 3,322, 6 - 5;53 - %5736 Cfrvtnrkerrp, (exarkertAc. (_am Attorney: Name: GRQ3l6 1Npk - arJ Address: 226 J. 'BRiore A ) RKV/LLC IF Phone Number s 6 53 - 3462 2 Fax Number: 6jO-6,53 - 71J4? Email Address: C1t`ea4fAas4a&ADSOD t`. boif"O, iI COM Engineer: Name: RO AKa A V Q 3.SOC IATes fwC Address: iSOV 141414 Groove LA "c AIAPERVILLe , IL Phone Number: 6.30 . 3Ss- 3x3 2- Fax Number: 630 . 3,55- 3267 Email Address: A Land Planner: Name: RiGNAR3) MARKER A.5 pcGkTESr 1N Address: / /fwAWLAN `J �tZ%✓,Y f �SRICVIL•i. 15 Phone Number: 6.30 - %V3 -3322 Fax Number: Email Address: CfY at- kee ® /! grkt'c%1& , CAm Page 2 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 Helen Harris Robert & Nanette Michalec Anthony and Emily Weeks 557 Heartland Drive 589 Heartland Drive 605 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Theresa Juodis Todd & Dawn Fitzgerald Robbin Arnfelt 627 Heartland Drive 649 Heartland Drive 661 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Richard & Maria Schroeder Heartland Residential Community Stephen Wessel 683 Heartland Drive 927 Heartland Drive 920 Chandler Avenue Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Geneva, IL 60134 Greg Millen Rafael & Rocio Perez Christina Bourque 220 Bridge Street South 953 Heartland Drive 965 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Leopoldo Barajas John & Deborah Soles George and Jeanne Deichmueller 977 Heartland Drive 1272 Mistwood Court 1258 Mistwood Court Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Charles Metzgar Richard & Kelly Zielie Kendall Investment Corp 1246 Mistwood Court 1224 Mistwood Court 2901 Butterfield Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Oak Brook, IL 60523 Patrick Williams Brian & Margaret Flynn Mark & Rita Meinert 1247 Mistwood Court 1235 Mistwood Court 1223 Mistwood Court Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Gary & Belinda Szurkowski James & Tamara Burdzinski Gordon & Lynne Stevens 1211 Mistwood Court 1202 Mistwood Court 926 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Hamdey & Diana Alley Buckingham Builders LLC Nicholas Diaz 938 Heartland Drive 123 Ambassador Drive #151 1294 Mistwood Court Yorkville, 11 60560 Naperville, IL 60540 Yorkville, IL 60560 Franklin & Debra Kryszewski Douglas Gordon & Krisina Hesbol David & Georgeann Wrobble 1283 Mistwood Court 676 Heartland Drive 698 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Jeffery & Peggy Barta McCue Builders, Inc. Raymond J. Waclaw 712 Heartland Drive 41 Royal Oak Drive West 756 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Bristol, IL 60512 Yorkville, IL 60560 Joseph E Kinney Anthony & Ann Marie Mormino Brian & Christine Kaitare 778 Heartland Drive 792 Heartland Drive 806 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Timothy & Mary Ann Schaper Thomas & Michele Pierce David Chittended 828 Heartland Drive 842 Heartland Drive 864 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Richard & Linda Mietz William & Tina Fabricino Oak Brook Bank 886 Heartland Drive 904 Heartland Drive Richard Marker Associates, Inc Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 654 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Scott & Lisa Sleezer Allen & Pamela Stanislaus Peter & Jennifer Huinker 632 Heartland Drive 608 Heartland Drive 598 Heartland Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Donald & Melissa Smith Hyung in & Kim Jong Sun Song John & Lynne Bivens 1045 Stillwater Court 1067 Stillwater Court 1089 Stillwater Court Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Charles & Lisa McGavern James & Michelle Nuzzo Nicholas & Vicki Stull 1092 Stillwater Court 1078 Stillwater Court 1056 Stillwater Court Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Alexander & Shawn MacPherson Richard & Cheryl Murray David & Kristine Andres 1034 Stillwater Court 865 Homestead Drive 887 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Rosemarie Gerady David & Annette Floeckher Keith & Deanna Cross 874 Haley Court 822 Haley Court 831 Haley Court Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Raymond & Susan Ziegler James & Julie Robbins Jeffrey & Suzanne Cramer 855 Haley Court 875 Haley Court 901 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 John & Nancy Murphy Eric & Sherri Dhuse Lorenzo & Marcella Perez 923 Homestead Drive 935 Homestead Drive 947 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Christopher & Julie Krumme Shawn & Erica Rathje Christina Smoczynski 959 Homestead Drive 961 Homestead Drive 973 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Rob Knierim Haohua & Gao Zheng Yang Robert & Kathleen Wall 985 Homestead Drive 997 Homestead Drive 1001 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 George & Sharon Musko Richard & Kathleen Korinek Steven & June Jaros 966 Homestead Drive 944 Homestead Drive 922 Homestead Drive Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 Shaye & Sunny Mandle Don & Carol Hamman Gerald Brongiel 896 Homestead Drive 13351 B Faxon Road 9120 Route 34 Yorkville, IL 60560 Plano, IL 60545 Yorkville, IL 60560 American Legion Post 489 PNGK Family LTD Partnership Robert & Kimberly Nadr 9054 U.S. Route 34 2956 Beth Lane 1060 McHugh Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Naperville, IL 60564 Yorkville, IL 60560 Marvin Pilmer David & Debbie Coffman Anthony Pignatello 1002 Prarie Street 7315 Hillside West 1107 McHugh Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Crystal Lake, IL 60012 Yorkville, IL 60560 Amanda Melick Edward Mystek 1105 McHugh Road 1101 McHugh Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Yorkville, IL 60560 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 8 IN HEARTLAND CENTER RESUPDIVISION OF LOT 3 IN UNIT 1 . BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 28 , TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN , IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP , KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS . ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST PETITIONER ROUTE Step 1 : Petitioner must submit a completed application, fees' and all pertinent materials to the Deputy Clerk a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. Petitioner is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, etc. , to allow timely review by City. 'Fees: a. Annexation or Annexation and Rezoning - $250 plus $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres b. Rezoning only - $200 plus $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres c. Special Use - $250 plus $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres d. Engineering Review Fees - 1 .25% of the approved engineer's estimate of cost of all land improvements, to be determined by City Engineer. e. Planned Unit Development fee - $500 f. Engineering Review Deposit - up to 1 acre = $1 ,000; over 1 acre but not over 10 = $2,500 over 10 acres, but not over 40 = $5,000 over 40 acres, but not over 100 = $10,000 over 100 acres = $20,000 g. Deposit for Outside Consultants - under 2 acres = $1 ,000 2 to 10 acres = $2,500 over 10 acres = $5,000 Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). Should Owner/Developer not pay these fees directly, they will be responsible for reimbursing the United City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs. Note: You must present your plan at each of the meetings below as indicated. Step 2: Plan Council: The Plan Council meets the 2n° and 4'h Thursday of the month at 9:30 a.m. in the City Administration Office. Upon recommendation by the Plan Council, you will move forward to the Plan Commission Meeting. Attendees to this meeting include: City Administrator, Community Development Director, Sanitary District Director, City Engineer, Building Department Official, Emergency Medical Rep, Public Works Director, Director of Parks and Recreation , Fire Department Rep, and Police Chief. Step 3: Park Board Planning Meeting: The Park Board makes recommendations on any Park Sites included in residential developments. The Park Board Planning Meeting is the fourth Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Riverfront Building, 301 E. Hydraulic Street. Step 4: Plan Commission: The Plan Commission meets the second Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Plan Commission will make a recommendation for the City Council's consideration. The Plan Commission consists of 10 members appointed by the Mayor, the City Attorney and City Land Planner. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Annexation Agreement and/or Rezoning request or Special Use request. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record and certified mail by the Petitioner to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject property no less than fifteen days and no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing date. A certified affidavit must be filed by the petitioner with the City Clerk's office containing the names, addresses and permanent parcel numbers of all parties that were notified. Page 4 of S United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 Step 5 - only required for annexation agreements or PUD agreements: City Council public hearing: The City Council meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Annexation Agreement and/or Planned Unit Development Agreement. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record. A certified mailing to surrounding landowners is not required for this public hearing. Any annexation agreement, PUD agreement or development agreement must be signed by the Petitioner prior to being voted on by the City Council. Step 6: Economic Development Committee and Committee of the Whole: The Economic Development Committee and Committee of the Whole meets the third Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Committee of the Whole where no formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings. Step 7: City Council: The City Council meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. This is where all City Council voting takes place. Agreement: I understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred Administrative and Planning Consultant Fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return this original (retaining a copy for your records) to the Deputy Clerk, United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. Date: Signature of Petitioner Page 5 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/26/06 10. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies. b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to page 4 of this application to "Petitioner Route, Step 1, Fees' and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount). c. Concept or Preliminary Site Plan: 40 sets folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope. d. One CD containing one electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with exhibits)and site plan. In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is contiguous to the United City of Yorkville. Date: 6=Q2 -y? Petitioner gnature: ( lega roperty owners signatures must appear on this application.) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of ' 200S Not r Sal OFFICIAL SEAL THI PPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. TAMI C TEACHMAN UBLIC NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF WNOIS I-------------------------t MY COMAAISSION EXPIRES:03114tt0 Page 3 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11128106 Step 5 -only required for annexation agreements or PUD agreements: City Council public hearing: The City Council meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Annexation Agreement and/or Planned Unit Development Agreement. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record. A certified mailing to surrounding landowners is not required for this public hearing. Any annexation agreement, PUD agreement or development agreement must be signed by the Petitioner prior to being voted on by the City Council. Step 6: Economic Development Committee and Committee of the Whole: The Economic Development Committee and Committee of the Whole meets the third Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Committee of the Whole where no formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings. Step 7: City Council: The City Council meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m, in the Council Chambers at City Hall. This is where all City Council voting takes place. Agreement: I understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred Administrative and Planning Consultant Fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return this original (retaining a copy for your records) to th eputy Clerk, United Cit .of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. Date: 4, -02 CV Signature of Petitioner Page 5 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised. 11/28/06 e e pet TMU aew� t h VV t t D \� gPR PN s ` / fiW f. Nit le�54Yfi ppp \ \. / V y PROPOSED mw- !I \ �\ L DR T EL - HRU s1. LANE 7,b t X _\ NEPR�- � N\fig\Nr \ y � V "xo ua nn• vw \ ♦ �^ �SS���G �z\. Ve�ec erie ?VA \ \ \ , "(iv. fa 4) 6 i r e� dp ts ,,, �pgSp • • pR gU\W\N� \o It It UpRE�N� \o,3� 'S �•• pRgp�'S NPR sl. 11pEVetae^sP`� w ,oa E. Vetecu^g ek `, 1 s ekw R arU d Drive • PROPOSED DRIVE—THRU LANE Richard Marker Associates ,, Inc . Heartland R� .a We e.� .W a9_OB Architects • Builders • Developers 630.553.3322 654 Heartland Drive • Yorkvill Illinois 60560 Center cam " E=114C C/T/ ,2 Q 0 Memorandum To: Plan Commission EST , _ 1836 From: Travis Miller CC: Annette Williams, Administrative Assistant (for distribution) Date: September 3, 2008 <CE `�� Subject: PC 2008 — 18 Heartland Center (Special Use, Drive Through) Staff has reviewed the Heartland Center proposed drive-through facility for the eastern end of the Heartland Retail Building located at 728 E. Veterans Parkway. The Jackie Dearborn, Civil Engineer recently conducted a survey of drive-through facility regulation in several other municipalities and prepared a report to assist staff when reviewing the appropriateness of drive-through facilities. This report (May 5, 2008) is attached for your use and reference. Staff Comments/Recommendations: 1 . The location and l l ' width of the drive-through lane is generally acceptable. 2. The intended user of the drive-through is a coffee shop. According to staff research, four (4) spaces provided in the stacking lane are adequate. The proposed facility includes a stacking lane of 80' that provides for 4-5 spaces beginning with the window location back to where the striping begins for the lane. The location of the menu/order board allows for one car at the board, one car at the window, one car in between and one car behind the menu board. 3. Sidewalk along the east side of the building, along with an existing man-door, should be eliminated from site/building. 4. The introduction of one-way traffic in the parking area east of the drive-through was recommended by staff during the Plan Council review in order to minimize confusion between motorist exiting the drive-through lane and those not using the drive-through. Special Use Standards (10-14-6 of Zoning Ordinance) F. Standards: No special use shall be recommended by the Plan Commission unless said Commission shall find that: 1 . The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will not be unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. 2. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. 3 . The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. 4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. 5. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. 6. The special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be modified by the City Council pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan Commission. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-74) •����!-%/�� v':::::.�:10.4.1�:i♦ 1.0'0111 1111: r1•••:.� -•f.1• ••.•••• ••• ••••1.1�, •11111• •11•I 1•1 r••• � III/ 1: •::::1i':::•�'L^�•:::O ::::1:::•1:•1:•::. �i�1:•1:::' I••1••••1•••:•:.. � •• ,1.111••1• •1��s� •1•. :.I��c1.1.1...... •11••1•••••1•••.•• x1.111.1.111•• i:•••. . :11. •••••e•. il`�•• •1•':IY�1�i:i:::♦ •.11.•1111••1•:::• ••.11...•::: ��:•e♦ 1•••.•.• • •Y::i::::ii0�1.1.1••111.•1• .................. r. ......... •. . .... ........!....1.......1.1•............ .................. .1 ......... :: . ,..�......'............................ .................... ......... : ::.. . ..........1•.1...................... .111.•.1...1.11..... .. ....... ;._.... .:..........1....1•..1................ ......�.,.❖.1.•3::.•.'J:10'.•...11 .•::.SO:! � �'.. '.':•:•::. O:. : .•.O•O.•.•.SOSSO:•.: ::.: r'✓.....•. . . •.....�.�;.•..•................1..1..1..1.1........... 1.1.111.1..11. • .............................•1.11 **Nub, ......... i:::•O:•O::O:�O: :0�•ii•O:i i::1v. •�•�O:1:1!•011:0:0:.00::1�:•O��.�••:::: 1 1.11111.11111.11.1.11,.••.1..•♦ -1DVi••- ,.1.11.1•....11111.1.11.•1111•• 1..1.11.1.•1.1.111.•1.11..•111.. •11•.11:.•. .1..1 .111.1.1.11..1.1.1111111' r•:•:•••:1•:.:•�•�•:1•�•�:•�i•�•�•:11�•1•i i.:•�:! '�•�•�•�•�•.•:i 1i.:':i•_ ��•1•1•i.:::'.•:i 1:•:1•:.•�i1:::1•��i •1111•••.•1.•1 H•11..1.•111.1•♦ •11.11.•1.11• • •1.1••••• ♦11.1.1.1111• .••1...111.11.11111••.P111111••. 1.1.1111•.• •:1•. .x•11.•1:•1111.11••11.' ♦11••.111.11.111 H..••...1.1.1• •1.11••..•:.••11• 11111• •1.11•.1.11 H♦ 11111.11111.11•••.11.1 x111••11• 1•.111••••1••••11.. X11•• ••1..••.111.1• •1111...11111.11.111••11.1..•1. 1.111111....• •11 X11• •11.1••♦1.•1.11.. x1.•1.•..1.111111.1..11.111••11 ♦.••••••1•••• ♦.♦ ♦1••..•• 11♦ •1..•1.' ♦11.1111111111111.1111 .11.1111. 111......1.....1•• 11.1..1.1•.1.11 x111.11.1.111..1111.111111..11• .111.1•••1••.•�••...'♦ •1••.•••.1••.I ♦•••..11.11.111.11•••'.•11.•1111 •11.111•.1.111 .x•111 • ♦•� •.•1••1••• (•••1.1..1.1.1.11•••1• ♦.•1.•1•• ••111.11• .1.• •111• • • ♦.1�:' ♦.•111•.•1.111.11.1•( x:1..11•.♦ ♦11•..111:11111111111 !• •e::: /•1...1.11.11••1.1.11x •1.••111.• ••111.1.1.•11.1.1•.••1•♦ •• •.::.• • •.•.e..1111.1..1••1••.11...111• ••1..11.11.1.11111.1111• `ems ��,• 111.•.1.1•••.11.111.1•.•1.•.1111. x1.•..1111••.•.11111..11. •.•1..1.•11111111111.11••11111• 111•.•111111•H I.H 11..a 1 1.1.111.1.11111.11.. .•1.•.111.• �♦.1.•111.11.•1111.•1••1. ♦11.1111111.1.11111•• ••1.1111.1. 11111.11111.111.1'x.11 ••1::••1:•::.•11:.11:1•::1•:,11111••.•1• �•�::•••1111•••111.111.1.11 •11.1.11.11 ♦1.1.1.1.•1111••111..1.•• 11111111.1..11111.1.1.1••1.•11♦ •1111.111••11.111.1.1111• 111••1111.•11.1.1.1• •...1.1111. ••••.11111.11.111111•..1111 1.•11•::1•:1:•:1 :1.1•:1•::::•:•:1.1•:1•::1: •1::::.:'1:•::•: ::.:':•!�:1•: x111 1..111.11.1111••' 111•• ♦1.11...1.1.•1111.1.11• ••-�.1 111.11111•. ••••• ".11111.11.1.1111.1... 1• •1..�,1.11• .111♦ 111111111.111.1.1•• ♦�e ••.1.:�1 ♦11• ��.•1.11.11.1111•.1:.. •I!•1• •1.•11.•111111.1111• •1.1• •1.1.111111.1••1••.1 ♦11.♦ •1..111111111.111• ♦1••• ••.111.1..111.1..:1: r•.1•. '11.11111.111••1. �•• ♦11•• x..1••11.•11.1•• •1.1.1.1.1 •••1.1.1•::111❖.'::::::: ♦11.1 •.1.11.111.11...• ♦111. 11.•1..1.1111•.1' X1.1. 1.1.1.1..111.1.• :•.•.•. 1.1.1•:i 1•:••1.1:•:1:'s• :.•1•:1: 1❖:1❖.•1•.•11:1•: •1.11 111.1• •1♦ x1..1. •11••..•1. 111 • 1:0::0 AO'd:�::•� I ♦1.♦ �1.1�.1 •.. •111 xx . ••- •. x111 � :• 1 P•� •111 . :-.- ::1•• x♦.• : �.•••.�wi 1:...,tea x1111.1' 1':1•••.•.1 :•i 1�:� 1 i :1••••11. . ♦.1.1..1111♦ ♦ • 1.1••1•��1�.•♦ x:1:• I� e • ,��D C/;� Memorandum 4 EST. , _ 1836 To: Travis Miller, Community Development Director From: Jackie Dearborn, Civil Engineer —1 Dp tswi� p CC: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer 1}/ <GE vim? Date: May 5, 2008 Subject: Drive-Through—Executive Summary The City of Yorkville, on April 10, 2008 passed Ordinance 2008-24 amending Zoning Ordinance 10-7A-1 and 10-7A-2. Drive-through facilities are special uses for the Office(0)Zoning District, also allowable as special uses in the B-1,B-2,B-3 and B-4 districts. There are unique concerns and issues that surround drive-through facilities that may require the development of supplemental standards or amendments to existing zoning ordinances. Sufficient stacking space, efficient internal circulation, adequate parking and site access are important issues to consider when designing a drive-through facility. In many cities, a drive-through is considered a special use with its own section of code. Some towns have adopted supplemental standards especially for drive-through facilities. Existing codes can be adapted to cover this special use or regulations can be integrated into sections of the existing code. Stacking spaces, for example, can be added to the zoning code for parking requirements. Lighting and menu boards may already be addressed in existing regulations. There are several guidelines that should be used for the development and review of site plan applications for drive-through facilities to provide safe, functional and attractive drive-through facilities. The following items present special challenges: • Access Connections • Stacking Lanes • Auto/Pedestrian Circulation • Loading/Parking • Grading/Drainage • Signs/Lighting • Architecture • Setbacks/Landscaping The attached table outlines these issues and concerns. This information was gathered from several sources including zoning standards that are in place at other municipalities. Requirements for spacing access onto public roads,promoting shared access and limiting access width can add to the safety of drive-through facilities. Internal circulation is complicated by the combination of stacking lanes,parking,pedestrians and delivery trucks. When not adequately designed on-site,these factors can cause problems on the public street. Signing, lighting and landscape issues should be addressed so that the building and site fit within the context of the neighborhood and the city to achieve the overall objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Drive-through Facilities: Any facility which by design, physical facilities, service or packaging procedures encourages or permits customers to receive service or obtain goads while remaining in their motor vehicles. This shall not include the selling of fuel at a gasoline filling station or the accessory functions of a carwash facility such as vacuum cleaning stations. Access: A way or means of approach to provide vehicular or pedestrian entrance or exit to a property. Spacing Width Posted Speed Limit/Access Spacing * not too close * well-defined 30 MPH 140 FT * cross access easements * not exceed 25' 30 MPH 210 FT * restrictions: right-in * minimize 40 MPH 280 FT or right-outtmedian 50 MPH 350 FT * common drives and curb cuts * not near major intersections where it would create carbon monoxide "hot spots" * min. 100' from any intersection Stacking Lanes: An area of stacking spaces and driving lane provided for vehicles waiting for drive—through service that is physically separated from other traffic and pedestrian circulation on the site. Number of Spaces Size Delineated Location * minimum 8 (before order board) * min 20' length * striping * 60' from public street intersection 4 between order board and window * 10' straight, 12' curves * curbing measured from property line to beginning of entrance If 2 windows, split 4 spaces * 12' curves, 11' straight * landscaping not to impede in/out of parking spaces 1 space after last window * 10 FT x 20 FT * alternate paving materials * separate drive from circulation * 1 bypass lane * 10' wide * raised medians * not to impede pedestrian movement * "bail out" capability * 12 wide (one lane), 10' - (two) * physical and visual separtation * not to interfere with loading/trash * At least 6 per lane * approx. 114 feet * emergency by-pass or exit * no exit into public R.O.W. * Auto car wash: 10 enter, 2 exit * min. 8' x 18' * 6" high poured-in-place conc curb * 40' from residential Bank: 6 per teller * 8 feet by 20 feet * can't double as circulation driveway * independent access to street Coffeee: 4 per window * min. 80 feet in length * a space at the window/menu board qualifies Dry Cleaner: 3 per window * min. 180 feet to each window * min 25' from drives entering a street Pharmacy: * no more than one lane per facility Restaurant: 12 total, min 5 between order and pick up Self-serve car wash: 3 entering, 2 exiting Service Station: 2 stacking, plus one at gas pump Other: 5 per window * 13 per 1000 SF of gross floor area * 7 per serving window * min 5 between order and pick up * max reduction for non-conforming: 24aindow or 25% of total reqd minus number not currently provided due to nonconforming (Texas) Internal Circulation: Intemal circulation of both auto and pedestrians Entrance/Exit Access Design • signs to Indicate direction * auto * two-way aisles • textured pavement * pedestrian clearly identified * speed of 10 mph • fencing * easements * integrate with stacking lanes • exit/no entrance * service drive or corridor * pedestrian walkways • stop signs if necessary Parking Spaces ]Loading: Mechanical/Deliveries/Loading Required # of spaces • semi-trucks * 10% reduction for shared service drives • location * 20% if peak times are not simultaneous • screened * shared by mutual agreement w/owners * one per 100 SF of floor area/min. 4 * stacking spaces don't count * comply with zoning laws Grading/Drainage Hest Management Practices (BMP): For the purposes of storm-water management structural or nonstructural and managerial techniques that are recognized to be the most effective and practical means to prevent or reduce non-point source pollutants from entering receiving waters. Grade Drainage: * maximum of 1% for first 30' * Subdivision Rules • avoid abrupt grade changes * Separate for stacking lane w/curb • less than 4% grade change between sidewalk and adjacent uses Signs: Define and cross reference existing standards. Menu Boards/Intercom Type # Height size Hours • meet screening standards * menu board max 6 feet max 30 SF * closed 10pm-6am if withing 300' from residential • 100' From residential property line * freestanding/2-sided max 1 max 18 inches max 16 SFlper side * restricted to 7am-10pm next to residential • shielded from street and residences * window max 25% of total window • less than 75 dBA measure 5' away * wall 1 max 9 SF • amplified PA prohibited next to res. * menu board 2 25 SF • prevent radiation of noise * freestanding or wall 2 45 SF • not be heard on residential property * menu boards 2 max 8' from grade 36 SF 132 SF if 2 boards • no attached product advertising * smaller second board max 4 feet max 6 SF Lighting: Reference existing ordinances. Type Amount Direction/Shielding • shoe box type * < 20 FT in height * with Interior shields • decorative in nature * < 12 FT for sidewalks * total cut-off of all light at 90 degrees from vertical • consistent with architectural theme * 8 to directly below at grade * only visible from below • Flood and area lighting unacceptable * 400W per drive-through * zero at lot line • Wall-pack with prismatic lens * reflectors of proper distribution for max efficiency wall-pack cut-off 70 degrees from vertical . .._..... .... ...._..._...... Architecture: Color and Materials Local Architecture Compatible • harmonious/compatible * facade • windows at entry for visibility to street * roof pitch • textures of wall and roof * style • "franchise architecture" discouraged * mass, proportion and scale Setbacks/Landscaping: Residential setback Landscaping Buffer Zones Size • min. 20 feet * properly maintained * public frontage 15 feet • solid 6' high masonry sound wall at * year-round landscape * sides & rear 20 feet residential property boundary * screening (abutting residential) * open areas landscaped * V wide curbed island between parking and "bail out" * maintain sight lines from stacking lanes to pad walkways Layout: Layout: Lot Area: Lot Frontage: Lot Depth: • Parallel or perpendicular to street * 50,000 SF * 250 FT 200 FT • maintain street line through walls, • fences or other elements when min * at least one acre in size * sidewalks on all setback can't be met * min. 0.50 acre within existing • min setback 40 FT from residential shopping center or urban area Traffic Study: • See Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District Drive-Through Facilities Review Standards: Part Two) • Additional studies may be required such as Air Quality Study or Noise Impact Study DRIVE-THROUGH DEFINITIONS: Access: A way or means of approach to provide vehicular or pedestrian entrance or exit to a property. Access Connection: Any driveway, street, curb cut, turnout or other means of providing for the movement of vehicles to or from the public/private roadway network. Best Management Practices (BMP): For the purposes of storm-water management structural or nonstructural and managerial techniques that are recognized to be the most effective and practical means to prevent or reduce non-point source pollutants from entering receiving waters. Cross Access: A service drive providing vehicular access between two or more contiguous sites so the driver need not enter the public street system. Directional Median Opening: An opening in a restrictive median, which provides for the specific movements and physically restricts other movements. Directional median opening for two opposing left or "U-turn" movements along a road segment are considered one directional median opening. Drive-In Service Restaurant: An establishment principally for the sale and consumption of food where food service is provided to customers in motor vehicles for consumption on the premises. Drive-Through Facility: Any facility which by design, physical facilities, service or packaging procedures encourages or permits customers to receive service or obtain goods while remaining in their motor vehicles. This shall not include the selling of fuel at a gasoline filling station or the accessory functions of a carwash facility such as vacuum cleaning stations. Drive Through Service Restaurant: An establishment principally for the sale and consumption of food which has direct window service allowing customers in motor vehicles to pick up food for off-premise consumption. Driveway/ Curb Cut Spacing: The distance between connections, measured from the closet edge of pavement of the driveway or curb cut to the next closest edge of the pavement along the public/private roadway. Fast Food Restaurant: Any restaurant serving the majority of its food in disposable containers, packages, or other similar wrapping, for consumption on or off the premises. Joint Access (or Shared Access): A driveway connecting two or more contiguous sites to the public/private street systems. Leveling Area: A level area (thirty (30) feet in depth at - 1% grade) at the intersection of the access connection and the public way. Lot, Corner: Any lot having at least two (2) contiguous sides abutting upon one or more streets, provided the interior angle at the intersection of such two sides is less than one hundred thirty-five (13 5) degrees. Restrictive Median: A physical barrier in the roadway that separates traffic traveling in opposite directions, such as a concrete barrier or landscaped island. Stacking Lane: An area of stacking spaces and driving lane provided for vehicles waiting for drive—through service that is physically separated from other traffic and pedestrian circulation on the site. Stacking Space: An area within a stacking lane for vehicles waiting to order and/or finish a drive — through transaction. a United City of Yorkville , 800 Ga1ne Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 $ ` o Telephone: 630-553 -4350 Fax : 630-553-7575 <tr PC # APPLICATION & PETITION ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST Development Name: Star tiuropean Imports Date of Submission: Requesting: 4 Annexation (Zoning a Planned Unit Development R Special Use: 1 . Name of Petitioner(s): _Lioness Land Company Address: 9316 Route 34 , Yorkville, IL 60560 Phone Number. 630-553-6555 Fax Number. 630-636-9008 _ Email Address: Www . starmerc . com Relationship of Pefftioner(s) to subject properly: R Owner gDeveloper 0 Contract Purchaser . 2. Name of holder of legal GOe, if different from #1: N /A If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names cif all holders of any beneficial interest therein: NIA 3. a). (1), Street address and physical location of subject property: 9376 . Route 34 , .Yorkville,- IL- 60560 (ii). Zoning of surrounding parcels: North: United City of Yorkville .B -3 Business District South: Kendall County R-3 Residential D�strict East: United City of Yorkville B-3 Business District West: , United City of Yorkville 13-3 Business District b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit W, c). Total Acreage: __ 2 d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of property: 02-28-252 -002 _— _ e). Current Zoning Classification: Kendall County B -3 Business District 0. Zoning Classification Requested: PUD g). Is this property within City limits? Yes X No, requesting annexation Page I or United City or Yorkvi Ile Annex at on,PUD,Zomng,Specia! We A pplication Rcviaod- 11129/06 4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners and landowners within 500' entitled to notice of petition under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: Attach a separate list and label as Exhibit "B 5. List all governmental entities or agencies required to receive notice under Illinois law: Bristol Township , f nMolflKsztdAl/.Fire..Department 6. List the Illinois Business Tax Number (IBT#) for the State of Illinois and names of businesses located on subject property to be annexed: 7. Does a flood plain exist on the subject property? No 8. Do Electors reside on the subject property? No If $o, they must execute this petition to annex. (Electors as defined by Illinois Law is a resident of the parcel who is a registered voter. Legal owners of the annexing parcel must . sign the petition regardless of place of residence. or legal voting status.) 9. Contact Informadon: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries re ln? Phis pa0tlon may be directed; Attorney Daniel J . -Kramer phone : 630553 -9500 fax : 630-553-5764 1107A S . Bridge Street Yorkville IL 60560 Attorney: Name: Danlfal J . Kramer Address: 1107A S . Bridge Street Yorkville IL 60560 Phone Number, 630-553-9500 Fax Number 630-553=5764 Email Address: -Dkramer@dankraipeElayv . com Engineer. Name_.- Zabel Enghteesiing Address: 203 South Rosedale Ave . Aurora IL 60506 Phone Number. 63Q-649-3634 Fax Number: 630-092- 1007 Email Address: wkz40@amerhterh , net Land Planner: Name: N /A Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: Page 2 of United City of YorM,ille Annexal ion,PUD,Zoning,Special Use A ppli cation Revised II12B/e6 10. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies, b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to page 4 of this application to "Petitioner Route, Step 1 , Fees' and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount)- c- Concept or Preliminary Site Plan: 40 sets folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope. d. One CD containing one electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with exhibits) and site plan. In witness whereof the following pets ioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is contiguous to the United City of Yorkville. Date: t0 ! a / Og Petitioners) nature: I legal property owners signatures must appear on this application.) Subscribed and sworn to before me this `�,(i day of 2007 _. o,QQ OD 11 rhv�� Notary Seal --- OFFICKL SEAL THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED, COLLEEN HANSON NOTARY PUBLIC • STATE OF ILLINOIS W COMMISSION E7( MS:1012tf1I Page 3 of S United City of Yorkvillc A nnexa6on,PUD,Znning,9pecnd Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE WESTERLY 334 FEET, AS MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34 OF THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION, 40 LINKS EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 34.82 CHAINS TO AN ANGLE IN THE CENTER LINE OF OSWEGO ROAD; THENCE NORTH 53 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID OSWEGO ROAD 111 .54 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE 07 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 608.9 FEET TO A POINT 340 FEET SOUTHERLY OF, MEASURED ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED LINE EXTENDED, THE CENTER LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34 FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NOR'T'H 07 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS LINE 44x% A DISTANCE OF 400.01 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34 PER PLAT OF RIGHT OF WAY PLANS RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 2002-08871 AND 2002-20014; THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 334.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE THAT IS 334.00 FEET EASTERLY OF (MEASURED ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 34) AND PARALLEL WITH LINE "A" AS AFORESAID; THENCE SOUTH 07 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 400.01 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN EASTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF SAID U.S. ROUTE 34, FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 83 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 334.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING for TOWNSHIP___ ME H. RANGE 7, ST O AS MEASURED ALONG THE SONxEPES FINE OF U.S. ROUSE OL OF LTO PAR! O ME FAST SOUMEFINEC OFSTHE,OWTHEAST Ji W E -- NORTH. RANGE E D SEC OF 40 +NASD CAST E SOWI, DESCRIBED AN FOLLOWS WMAST OUT AT A POEM ON IDS - --- _ SULLIES HE T 3 82 CHAINS W IAN US RD w0 SOUTHEAST NORTH 5: OUTI THENCE NWRM 1 ES GOES 30 MINUTES ---- CENTER NE SAID LNVXS SO IJISMLLE FTIE O A PO T; O OSY£GO GREE- MFHCE ROHM 55 DEGREES JS MED ET SECONDS WI EAST µEEL 1X1 GENRES ONE F. SAID RED ALONG G W +I15a FEEL }0 A PONT; THENCE W DEGREES ]0 M 10 D -- _ MEASURED O SEC ME LAST DESCRIBED V IXIFNON, ME ETHRED ONE OF US. .. A DISTANCE 3A FO TIE E01 OE BEGINNNC. THERI �-� OF UEL O EE 4 PER CO SEC IC EAST ILONL A ONE ASD PEFEPPFD i0 AS CAL ?A+e ; AD2002-F 014, ENT TO WE NORM @ERSUNEN _ MI US, 46 SE Ja PER ET OF SAID OF WAY PINS E, A DISTANCE AS OF 3SHO "UNDER E THAT isY; M FEET E SOUTH FACTORY OECHFES 36 NN6 16 LONG 5 FCO ALONG ME OF U S AR UXE A NOR RAE OF JWI 00 FEET TO A PdM OX P UM CE S ES ]3 -�5 AEO4SO_NG NG ND PAGUEV ME OF A DISTANCE PW+E OF COUNT MET T WITH F ONE DRAWN AS LCIFY. PA ALLELE SOUW 07 DEGREES ONS F SAES Sp SIN SpSSpNEPo ROOM M ONC END E CE W IN FINE S Po lDS WEST WON ME CENTER O UNE G WORRIES U. . ROOM OF BEGINNING,FROM NG, IN ME OEUENHING: THENCE HORM Ol DEGREES ME E SONG w0 PMN1£E ONE ]3.00 FCC t0 WE TO V C+ PEN+ PES S SSN RVp0EE0 STEERIING COREEM, SEGENNMG. ME i0WN5NIP-O�BMSTOLpFNULL1 COUNTY, J EDGE OF PAVEMENT -------------- __ ON h PACE .%S MLL4M _____ ------ --------------- JO O JO 60 90 ° 8g 'Pg cExrEZ ' _______________ ° ONE of Us. � . —P �- SOME 3. S Scale 1 " = 30' r —_ _ - ipe a STAN I 18$36`663 _ /EWE pE PA - ___ PE 0,26 H I _- VEMFNI 3 ____ C'X'AT I I o° PROPWEO 20 - . . L�,g� _ _ ____ µEx o DEDICATION _ i)1 3 — —PR9PoSE ..� 25— gi ANY a P L I I �° w % GNP_ LpD' H READY 9 SITE nP TE DFxCX MR I i �^S ° PPOPoSEO CROg ACCESS GSEMEM —� I 1 i i T > >) PPoPOSm CROSS ACCESS FnswvT — $ 8 h cpxc. Po. PROPOSED 'euT°N ° `8895 --- ' ASPHALT PAWAEM u Ro F' I riO4!D g _ — - °o ✓ ONE Srry RUPpExD 6880' _ e F/F ii r ° STRONG i[lik PSOPoR DUEifOR1p SE /f 9.714 w / I 6>es _ OV I M — rz �Paci of 9.a alo�_NO DUMPSYCRE CAN 1S D w I I I I.POSED A Sw PAC S.M r I d 9 o%n / Ix pE m I iPSpPoS O R' IAY SENT Yv. ux0 3m I P ews RR7n. DUMPS2a d P OO9a. oRNA .g"r l°j°a D3.' E I - - 3 T/ry IN R = ExgpsAGE ._� i vEMElir ANING 0 HE ON LINE f $ PROPOSED DETENTION 2`P� vow LASOM10 O ''ti��E x Tx PR s o I g 13 iREA z5s s`5e c L GY d EyL ER L_ FkN F n K V PROPHESY 6 SIGN S WPRD O SEVEN AON GUAM NN _ _ _ _ A ll no¢zgn ONE y FExCE IS Is S. _ D OOH PPE _ ^,�SAz O P`¢ ICOM COME IS S, tr 09J ry V SBA VYb G° BUM CM DISTRICT tr s E RUTH 3446 _ ID bP�Str" _ usry '461v. SHED S�pPO POEM OF _ P Ox=anaa6n WAINNENG IEEE ME PROPOSETOMTAMI FIT AN ISO - '$Au FENCE IS ON FILE P \ 0 _ m ASKED" PROPOSED IcY �\\ PN^'1 OffC Po NIF CA- \ IF GO �E m ( R`ZSZRR} OUTDOOR PAVER P�MN^ 42222 DISPLAY AREA °A`v'10gE IF 5RpO:SAS Y 8N AREAS TO BE DEDICATED a 8. AS STATE R.O.W. - ry Wu EROCEMEA PREPARED BT REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION NO. DAT DESCRIPTION _ STAR EUROPEAN IMPORTS P EPAReD FOR KOZIOL ENGINEERING SERVICES LINKS 0 08/15/08 CONCEPT PLAN STAR EUROPEAN IMPORTS Pmle¢sgno Engin¢<'s N ROUNDE 34 1709 c ER o nos , IL 6 AVE. GEOMETRIC PLAN tt1RMY+E1£ IILNds SDUM E IA5LE L 605]$ (6]0)55]-6555 SEC 8-1i- 6301435-8686 CIVIL/ CONSULTING ENGINEERS DSGN. BY: FILE NAME: 08145 SMET NO, DRN, BY SCALE: 1 -30 A of A A e Memorandum 9 To: Plan Commission EST. 2 ® gas From: Travis Miller and Stephanie Boettcher �-� CC: Annette Williams (for distribution) ® (® Date: September 3, 2008 �ru O ;yvv? Subject: PC 2008 — 19 Star European Imports (Annexation and Rezoning) GE The petitioner is requesting annexation and PUD zoning for 2 acres located at 9316 Veterans Parkway (US34). Along with the petition for annexation, the petitioner has submitted Geometric Plan depicting existing and proposed site improvements. Staff has reviewed the Geometric Plan as the Concept PUD per Zoning Ordinance Chapter 13. Comprehensive Plan Recommendation for Property The 2002 Comprehensive Plan, as well as the pending 2008 updated, recommends Commercial land use for the subject property. The Comprehensive Plan defines Commercial as, ". .. to promote market-sensitive development of commercial uses within strategically located areas to efficiently, effectively, and conveniently serve the growing local population, while continuing the importance of the United City of Yorkville as a regional center. " Staff Comments and Recommendations: 1 . The petitioner request of Planned Unit Development zoning is appropriate and will allow special provisions beyond the B-3 zoning requirements to be applied to this property. This zoning request should be noted on the Geometric Plan dated August 15, 2008, as opposed to B-3 Service Business District. 2. Staff suggests B-3 Service Business District to be used as guideline for the subject property in regards to zoning requirements. See B-3 Zoning Requirements listed below. Zoning Requirements — B-3 Service Business District Lot Area: Minimum 10,000 sq. ft. Front Yard: Minimum 50 feet Side Yard: Minimum 20 feet Transitional (Rear) Yard: Minimum 30 feet Lot Coverage: Maximum 50% Maximum Building Heipht: Maximum 35 feet or 3 .5 stories Parking Lot Setback: 20 feet from property line 3 . The concept plan dated August 15, 2008 is in compliance with all of the aforementioned requirements, excel)t for the side yard and parking lot setback zoning requirements. These two deficiencies are further addressed below. 4. Parking requirements for motor vehicle sales — 1 space per 600 square feet of floor area. 16.2 spaces are required. Parking requirements for retail stores — 1 space per 300 square feet of floor area. 20 spaces are required. The proposed plan provides for 66 spaces for the dealership, this does not include the amount provided in the sales area, and 21 spaces for the retail building. 1 5. Given the abundance of parking, staff recommends modifying the 14 spaces (@9'=126') along the eastern part of the property to be 6 parallel spaces (@20'=120') and eliminate the 17 spaces along the western part of the property in order to provide 16' side yard along the eastern and 20' side yard along the western property lines. 41 parking spaces are still provided for the dealership exceeding the parking requirements. Note: the staff recommendation still leaves the eastern setback is 4' deficient of the 20' requirement. Based on the Plan Council discussion, the petitioner expressed concern for the spaces along the eastern property line in order to be convenient for dealership customers — staff recommends allowing this deficiency an incorporating into a provision of the Annexation/PUD Agreement. 6. On the geometric plan, the parking setback requirement is not met given the proposed land dedication along US 34. Staff recommends a waiver of this requirement based on at least 10' will remain between future pavement edge/curb and parking and due to this area being a display area for the dealership and not a typical parking lot. 7. The geometric plan states the site has lot coverage of 67.75% above the maximum 50%. However, lot coverage applies to buildings and structures, so lot coverage for the property is actually less than the requirement and is in compliance. The concept plan needs to be corrected to reflect this. 8. 1 free standing permanent sign with a maximum of 32 square feet in area and 8 feet in height would be permitted on the subject property. The current site plan identifies only 1 sign location, in conformance with this requirement. Staff recommends the petitioner to provide additional sign specifics in regards to appearance and size of the sign prior to annexation agreement approval. 9. Staff suggests the petitioner provide additional lighting specifications prior to annexation agreement approval. The use of wall packs on buildings should be minimized and lighting should follow the "dark sky" concept promoted by the City of Yorkville. 10. Given the amount of impervious surface, staff supports the use of paver brick on a portion of the property as it allows for better groundwater infiltration than other paving materials. Since, the plan provides square footage of impervious versus pervious surface onsite; staff suggests the petitioner provide additional specifications in regards to groundwater infiltration for pervious and impervious surfaces. 11 . Any redevelopment, improvements, or additions added to the subject property should follow the United City of Yorkville Design Guidelines, specifically Principles 4 — 5 and 8 — 10, see attached. The Annexation Agreement should include a provision(s) addressing these guidelines. 12. Per the City' s Appearance Code, the trash receptacle enclosure shall be made of material compatible to the material used in the existing principal structure. 2 13 . The subject property shall comply with the requirements outlined in the City's Landscape Ordinance. However, Staff recognizes that given the use of the property and the current concept plan, the all of the requirements outlined in the City' s Landscape Ordinance may not be met. Specific areas with potential deficiencies meeting the Landscape Ordinance requirements include parkway landscaping, interior parking lot landscaping, perimeter parking lot landscaping, and lot landscaping. Given this, Staff is amendable to modifications to the Landscape Ordinance requirements, as long as the quantity of landscape material is not reduced on site. Staff suggests that the petitioner submit a landscape plan prior to annexation agreement approval in order to specifically address these deficiencies and modifications in a provision(s) of the Annexation Agreement. 14. Staff recommends a preliminary grading plan accompany the Geometric Plan. A grading plan is required to determine existing drainage patterns and evaluate the proposed detention area. The outfall of the proposed detention basin and the offsite drainage should be included. 15. Utilities: a. Sanitary sewer connection to the Heartland Business Center may be the only viable alternative for sanitary service to the property. An 8" sanitary sewer exists with invert elevations of 635.5 at McHugh/Rt.34 and 633 .9 at McHugh/Farmstead. This alignment would require offsite easements across adjacent properties, but also possible cost participation by those adjacent property owners. A very shallow 8" sanitary sewer with an invert elevation of 636.5 exists on the Shops at Veterans Parkway property, about 110 feet west of the subject property. b. An existing 8" watermain is located near the NW corner of the site. This watermain needs to be extended across the property' s Rt.34 frontage. c. The piping within the septic field should be filled with solid materials such as sand, gravel or concrete to prevent collapse from driving over. 16. The cross access easements should each include a dimension for the width (25 '). A note indicating that the cross access easement also allows the adjacent properties access across the property should be included on the Geometric Plan as well. 3 L..... .. ................ ...1 .... .........................111..1..1 .. . .......................r :.•.•.•IA4!.;.• ;.•.;.;.;.;;.;:•.;.,:1.;.;.;.•.�.�.;.;.;.;.;.;'.;1 ;.'.❖.•.•.•:: •: :.•.❖.•....❖.....•.•.•.•.•.•.•:.•.•• iiiiiiii1wi All Sri i•:•: •:•::•:;:� :�.•::❖:•:•:•:.•:..-r.•.-...... . ...._...e••::::::..•:....•::.•:.•: .. . 111..11............1..1.... ........ - ...,.......... ...:.•1 ...'.•.•.•.❖.•.•.•:.❖.•.❖.•.•.❖.•.•.❖.•.❖....❖.•.•..:. r.•.•:.•:::•.:.. . 'O•:•: '.•O.❖.❖:.•O, :•:.. .. ...................................... .. ::..•.�.. ......... .:: :... ... ........................................ ............... ...... ........................................ ..................... . ....... .:...... .... ...................................... ..... ••• ........... . ................................................. ...................... 1 1.....• •.,..::•:.....-!...f•.•1 ... ���.�.•.���.�t�l .�..x.11 ..1:.� :::::::::.........:•:: ..�.�.♦ ♦.1♦ ..1...1........1..:. • ' •�.t :.1. . .1..........•1..... . .•-11 ;x ..... •.•..•........1.... . .... ...1 ......1..11......• .. •1.... ...N ...1..1.....:..• .... �. ♦.1..1......1. •.1.1.1 . .. 1 ♦... ♦.1 1 1.......1 .111 • • _ :1.. 1......1..1.• jib •••••••..1.:•:�� 111.. •..... .... •;..... ....,. ;;iii:•.•..::. 11 14 y Y i e �m® • R �+y�•7�w qu �!7n�+ e ' rrm Iffii''ii ir. g � 'I, ems+® 4• R•VAF d � - �V a -.101 NAY r i Design Guicjelines Site Planning Pvinciples • Development on unsuitable soils is prohibited. Incorporate unsuitable soils into an open space component of the site plan. • Stockpile top soil for later use in landscape areas. Vegetation • Preserve existing trees Every effort should be made in the planning process to incorporate quality, existing trees into the site plan design. Any quality, existing tree that occurs within the specific buffer yard as required per PRINCIPLE 9 shall remain undisturbed and be protected as part of the landscape — buffer. Preservation of existing vegetation as buffer PRINCIPLE 5: Provide a sense of architectural interest and unique identity throughout the citv The Architectural standards are provided to preserve and guide x _* the character of architecture throughout the City while allowing ° for individual architectural interpretation. All architectural proposals must be compatible with the vernacular of the �P> northern Illinois region. In order to ensure compliance with the following architectural guidelines, the City requires that building elevations, plans, materials samples, color samples and illustrations be submitted for review and approval prior to the commencement of building construction. ■ Buildings Building orientation creates central open • Orientation space on axis with the main entry drive Building orientation should take advantage of the building to site relationship. The orientation and location of buildings defines open ; spaces and circulation corridors. • Align focal architectural elements along major view or x circulation axis. • Define pedestrian spaces and streetscapes with building orientation. Orient primary buildings on axis and use as focal points limited Gity of Yowl<.yille Comprehensive Land Llse Pjan lApdate Design Guidelines Site Planning Principles • Create view corridors coxs°ex o.°rsmxm between buildings, plazas, courtyards and adjacent , ,�1PNMNID buildings. —I iIXf PATO f' • Create pedestrian spaces KARPYwnx°ro and plazas by varying building facades. • Cluster buildings whenever possible, creating opportunities for plazas and Residential building orientation creates pedestrian malls. Prevent private,intimate backyard space long, linear facades from dominating the view. • Buildings adjacent to Routes 47, 71 and 126 must face the primary roadway. No service °wn,w•eunowe �b &I ` roroxM Or�x mACev {I access, storage, etc. is allowed to face Routes t 0 °2 ra gyp' 47, 71 and 126. X OVII GTfC F Vy • Develop sites in a o ,,. comprehensive and ° >y J I coordinated manner to i provide order and y _ compatibility (especially ° in the case of large sites Building orientation can define main activity areas which will be developed in phases). • The exterior character and orientation of all buildings and the spaces they define should encourage and enhance pedestrian activity. • Attention should be given to the quality and usability of the outdoor spaces formed by the 1 exterior of a dwelling and adjacent dwellings. Avoid locating the private area of one dwelling adjacent to the public area of an adjacent dwelling. Rear and side facades should incorporate architectural design elements Vvofe-d ci+y of Vor`kvine Gompt`eke-Visive, Lavtd Lose. plate Update -12 Design GNic�elines Site planning Principles • In multi-family residential developments, buildings should be oriented to create functional outdoor spaces. • In residential neighborhoods, consideration should also be given to the views from adjacent dwellings and public spaces. • Facades Building facades should achieve a high level of visual interest when viewed from automobile and pedestrian vantage points. • In residential developments, front yards and porches should be used to create a sense of place and community. • Natural stone and mason ry materials are to be used on the lower portions of buildings to create a visual anchor to the ground and provide interest at the pedestrian level. • Vary the planes of exterior walls in depth and/or direction. Awnings along facade • Wall planes shall not run in a continuous direction more than 65 feet without an offset of at least 3 feet. a • Wall planes of more than 20 feet high are prohibited without incorporating meaningful techniques, such as awnings or a change in building material, to break up the perceived NOW OPEN building mass. • Awnings are encouraged along facades to -' • provide color, shade and architectural interest. Where awnings are used along a row of contiguous buildings, a consistent form, material, color, location and mounting arrangement must be used. • Awnings should be located to provide a _ consistent minimum S feet vertical clearance, with a maximum generally not to exceed 12 feet. f' _ • Colors of awnings must complement the Awnings provide pedestrian scale element buildings. L1ni+e_J Cify of Yopkville Comprekehsive .Land Use. Picn Ltpclete 13 Design Cwicielines Si+e Plrannine Principles • Incorporate the awnings along with any signage to provide a uniformly designed building fagade. • Signs on awnings are permitted. ,r v • Internally illuminated awnings are prohibited. Garage doors oriented to side • Awnings and canopies may be made of sheet metal or canvas membrane. Plastic or vinyl awnings are not permitted. • In new residential neighborhoods, houses shall not repeat the same elevations without two lots of separation. Houses across the street from each other and back-to-back corner lots shall not be of the same elevation. • In residential areas, garages should not dominate the street view. Rather, provide parking and garages to the side or rear of lots or set the garage face back from the primary fagade of the house. Avoid allowing the garage to become the primary architectural feature. • Roof Treatment Rooftops should be considered important design elements as viewed from a variety of vantage points such as at ground level, from other a7; buildings and from adjacent perimeter _ ) Ok roadways. A well-composed ♦ - "roofscape" achieves an interesting +. skyline without becoming overly busy t or contrived. Roof forms should serve C as natural transitions from the ground level to intermediate masses to the � ' tallest masses and back to the Variation in roof treatments creates an interesting`rootscape' ground. Form should also be interesting when seen from above in adjacent buildings. • Materials & Colors Visual continuity in major building materials and colors is desired throughout the City. Specific criteria include the following: • Material samples of all proposed buildings must be provided for review and be approved by the City. • Materials should be consistent with the Community Character principles outlined in these guidelines. LAY,ifecl City of Yovkville C-omprelnensive .avid tAse Piave [Apda+e 14 Design Guidelines Site Planning Principles • Wall materials that are muted, earth tone in color and have texture are to be used. • Reserve the use of strongly contrasting materials and colors for accents, such as building entrances, railings and trim. Avoid an excessive variety of fagade tJJJI I materials. • Avoid using highly reflective materials and surfaces, such as polished metal, that generate glare, particularly at the pedestrian level. • Materials which may be incorporated include: native stone, brick, stucco and textured concrete. Alternative III�H materials that achieve similar looks and are of high quality and low maintenance may be considered. +• + Common materials shall be located on all sides of the _ - building with the exception of service areas not visible from a public street. Varying rooffine breaks up long expanse of building facade • Coordinating materials within a development can tie together buildings of different sizes, uses and forms. • In new residential neighborhoods at the time of initial building permit, houses shall not be the same color unless there are at least two lots of separation. Houses across the street from each other are not permitted to be the same color. • Use contrasting but compatible building materials and textures to unify exterior building elements and to create depth, proportion and scale. • In residential developments, buildings should complement each other by using materials and colors within the same"family". • Building colors should be derived from, and related to, the finishes of primary building materials. • Height The overall appearance of development shall be low and horizontal, with building heights throughout the community generally low to medium scale. Building heights are expected (and desired) to vary to ensure visual interest. • Consider the use of taller buildings and/or elements to highlight significant intersections and pedestrian nodes. • Building heights shall be determined in a manner - : which enhances an overall residential quality.. Taller bulldrngs help identify intersections Wiited Gify of\,/01-kville- Comprehensive Land LVse Plan Llpc{ate 15 Design Gwidelines Site Planning Principles • Maintain compatible relationships with adjacent dwellings and street frontages. • Building heights shall be responsive to heights of homes located on slopes above and below the dwelling. • Sight lines to greenbelts, open areas, T.1 water features and scenic horizon views are to be optimized and maintained to the fullest extent possible by minimizing the building height and obstruction. Front porch provides one-story element • Scenic view compatibility shall be considered in determining building height. `- --• Within a neighborhood; a combination of _ --- one, one and a half and two story T` dwellings is encouraged to add diversity it to the streetscape. Entire neighborhoods or blocks of continuous two story dwellings are discouraged. • For multilevel dwellings on corner lots, locate a one-story element of the dwelling Front porch roof provides human scale element at the street corner to help reduce the feeling of enclosure in the neighborhood. • A two-story dwelling can best relate to a neighboring one story if it contains a one-story element. • Scale Buildings should appear to be of a "pedestrian" or "human" scale. When components in the built environment are designed in such a way that people feel comfortable, then human scale has been `t achieved. In general, this means that the size, patterns, textures, forms and overall three-dimensional composition 1 . can be appreciated at the pedestrian level. • Vary the height of buildings, and/or Varied building scale provides distinction between masses building elements where feasible, so they appear to be divided into distinct elements or masses. Wae_d City of Yov°kyille Comprebtensive Land Llse Plan Update 16 Design GNldelines Site planning pvinciples • Avoid large-scale buildings that are �- �f� �✓/�� "box-like" and typically dominate a - - — — site. • Use building mass appropriate to the site. Place buildingsr�` with larger footprints, height 4 Q and massing in core activity areas or in the heart of the Q development near " similar densities. By _ doing so, the impact on adjacent land Pedestrianscale elements located along building facade uses will be reduced. • In residential areas, the relationship r. between the lot size, street width and building scale are important to creating a human scale. Elements such as trees, pedestrian path lighting and porches can aid in achieving human scale. f tt • Hierarchy 11 It is important to recognize that future "r projects will be developed using a variety of buildings with various uses. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic should be able to Avoid'box like'building scale recognize the hierarchy of buildings and be able to decipher primary buildings from secondary buildings. • Primary Buildings „, o Primary buildings; such as major anchors, public buildings or major attractions, shall be located at prominent locations, anchoring a major view axis and - serving as focal points in the community. _ • Gateway Buildings • Buildings at major entrances, comers, intersections or along significant roads should use special s„v architectural elements to help identify that location as a"gateway". These elements also begin to define the sense of place for the community. Primary buildings located on axis and create focal point L mifecr Gift of Yo;-kville Gompv-eke-visive Land LAse P[cm L1:pdictfe- 17 Design 04"Idelines Si+e Planning Pvinciples • Special architectural features may include corner towers, cupolas, clock towers, balconies, colonnades or spires. • The use of vertical elements helps to frame the entrance and guide people into and through the development. TUNERS HELP IDENTIFY COR%ER or BUILDING PS GATE'NAY I1,170 HE DeIELGPMENT I REEK IJ HEIGHT Of' BRFPIUIP HEIGHT Jr iUWER Gateway buildings • Entrances ,,,���/// • Primary entrances should be easily identifiable and relate to both human scale as well as the scale of the building(s) 01 1 011 they serve. • Wherever possible, entrances should be inviting without R becoming dark. • Main building entrances should be designed to be clearly identifiable from primary driveways and drop-offs. Additionally, they should be visible from parking areas. ■ Retaining walls • All retaining walls must be faced (veneered) with masonry Main entry to store (stone, brick, stucco or approved equal). clearly Identifiable • Retaining walls adjacent to or visible from any street shall not exceed 4 feet in height. Grade changes that require retaining walls exceeding 4 feet must be terraced with a minimum of 4 feet clear separation between each wall. Exceptions may be reviewed and approved by the City in order to preserve existing tree stands. LAvae-d Gify of Yorkville Gornprellehsive Land LAse Plan Update 18 Design Guiclelines Site Planning principles • Walls should be designed as an integral part of the dwelling design. Stone sizes should be consistent and laid in a horizontal course. Masonry materials shall match or complement the facade of surrounding buildings. • Walls at intersections must not interfere with safe sight distances. PRINCIPLE 6: Enhance pedestrian experience and establish sense of place through careful design and location of open spaces The creation of open space throughout the City is an essential technique used to break up building facades. The use of such pockets of interest creates views into the various developments. A wide range of open spaces such as public gathering plazas, open "greens", common play areas, neighborhood parks and natural preserves can be incorporated into development plans. ■ View Corridors • Open space is considered a valuable amenity, therefore careful consideration of vistas into open spaces from residential lots, streets and drives is required. • Maintain view corridors to provide vistas of amenities, natural features, open spaces and other significant elements. • Create focal points at main entries, on axis with major -- - - circulation route and pedestrian corridors to establish a Community Park strong identity and structure for the project. O LOCATE SPECIAL FEATURE AT TERMINUS OF DRIVES. �y vCO GATIOPI FRAMES VIEW AND CREATES CORRIDOR View of amenity feature is Gamed by use of vegetation and road alignment,creating a signature element United Gift of Yorrkville- Gomprekensive Land Use- P[cm Ltpdafe 19 i Design Guidelines Site Planning Principles • Accessibility Owners and developers are expected to meet or exceed all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 1992, and all amendments thereto in the design and development of Individual parcels, sites, buildings, and facilities. To the greatest extent possible, provide equal access in a manner that integrates ADA accessibility with ordinary accessibility, rather than separately. PRINCIPLE 8• Appropriate design of parking lots utilities service areas and detention areas to reduce the negative impact of typically unattractive site components This section provides standards for the siting and layout of parking lots, service and loading areas, utilities, trash, storage and detention facilities. Specific landscaping criteria for these areas are included in the Landscape Principles section. Site plans specifying parking and circulation designs, utility and detention requirements shall be submitted to the City for review. Parking • Parking ratios and quantity of spaces shall comply with the criteria set forth in the United City of Yorkville Zoning Ordinance. y • Parking areas should be designed and located so _ ?",ti " . they provide safe and efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation within a site. • Minimize negative visual Impacts from adjacent roadways. • Break large expanses of pavement with landscape Minimize negative visual impacts of medians and islands. parking from roadways • Divide parking areas which accommodate a large number of vehicles into a series of smaller, connected lots. • Avoid situations where parking spaces directly abut structures. • Separate parking aisles from interior collectors and entry drives whenever possible. cmalar bmlainse re /� create open apace Walkways to buildings plazas should be designed to ^ Pecilitele easy movement and , uliulhul.orossdm9 contlicts with VaNCIes Arrange parkih, aisles perpanalcular to buildlne provide pedestrian anman ces access In adjacent developments United Gift' of Yaalcyille- Gompvehensive Land Use Plan Llpc{a+e 25 Design Guidelines Sife Planning Principles ■ Undesirable Elements: The following elements are discouraged In developments within the City: • Concrete detention basins • Large, blank, unarticulated wall surfaces • Visible outdoor storage, loading, equipment and mechanical areas Avoid large expanses of parking lots • Disjointed parking areas and confusing circulation - - patterns • Large expanses of parking/asphalt i • Service areas near major entries and/or that are easily visible from roadway • Poorly defined site access points • Large"boxlike°structures Avoid large blank wall surfaces PRINCIPLE 4: Incorporate existing site conditions into development plans New development shall protect the existing environmental features throughout the City and minimize the impact of the development on the site and the surrounding land. • Drainage Patterns Proposed site plans shall incorporate existing drainage patterns on site in an effort to avoid significantly altering the manner in which drainage flows offsite. At the time of site plan submittal to the City, a drainage and detention plan must be submitted. The location and type of drainage facilities must be shown. Drainage swa/e utilizes natural drainage patterns • Topography and Soils • Minimize out and fill on site to reduce effects upon the natural drainage pattern and natural character of the site. • Minimize disturbance in areas of significant existing vegetation, If necessary for site development, consider using tree wells and retaining walls to preserve existing trees where possible, iiwi workwitb existing topography to avoid large cutand till Lthited CRY a{yowWffe- Cornp-ekensive Land LAse P'an VpdeAfe 10 Desi 9 n Guidelines Site Planning Principles • Shared Parking Where opportunities exist for shared parking between uses with staggered peak parking demands, consider reducing the total number of parking spaces within each site or parcel. Parking should be shared between complementary uses such churches and office buildings. • Store Front& Street Parking Requirements All store front parking areas shall use angled parking or parallel parking. Areas shall be provided for sidewalks and landscaping between the store front and the edge of parking stall. • Bicycle To encourage and accommodate alternative transportation modes, provide bicycle parking within each building site. Locate bicycle parking areas so they are visible from building entrances and convenient for riders. Parking areas shall be landscaped in a manner consistent with pedestrian plazas. Also, bike racks should be of a style consistent with other site elements. • Substations/Water/Wastewater Stations Proposed electric substations, water pump stations and wastewater lift stations shall be screened from public views by a means of a 6 foot masonry wall on all sides with the exception of the area for gate access to the facility combined with landscaping. Service access shall be considered and incorporated into the screening program. • Detention • Drainage facilities should be used as an amenity to " R a development. If the existing topography allows, the location can be incorporated into an entry feature or can be the foundation for a park with trails and open space. • Natural and/or vegetated drainage swales provide open space connections, filter runoff and improve the aesthetic appearance of development. cane serves as main entry feature • Detention facilities should not be designed as to I' require chain link fencing or concrete walls. If such designs are required due to engineering requirements, consider using decorative modular stone to give the appearance of a retaining wall. • Detention ponds located in the front yard building setback shall be designed as a curvilinear, Naturalistic drainage channel provides contoured shape. opportunities for trail connection V hife-d GifY of Yorkville Govnprekensive Land Flue flan Update 26 Design Guidelines Si+e Planning principles • Location of Utilities Visual and sound impacts of utilities, mechanical equipment, data transmission dishes, towers and other equipment should be minimized in all development plans. • Design and install all permanent utility service lines underground. • During construction and maintenance, minimize disruptions to other sites and businesses within the City. • Temporary overhead distribution power and telephone lines are permitted during construction but shall be removed immediately upon completion of site and building construction. • Wherever possible, mount data transmission and receiving telecommunication devices at ground level to the rear of structures and screen views from adjacent roadways, pedestrian paths and building sites. • Screen all electrical transformers, gas meters and other utility cabinets from view. • Structures are prohibited from being located in utility easements. Avoid locating signs, special landscape features, etc. in utility easements. Air conditioning units, vent systems and other mechanical systems that must be located on building roofs shall be screened from sight at the ground plane. • In residential communities: • Items requiring screening should be located on the rear or side yards when possible and should be integrated into the unit design. • Air conditioning units must be located behind a screen wall or planting hedge. • Utility meters must be located on side or rear elevations of the dwelling. ■ Location of Service/Deliverylrrash/Storage Areas The visual impacts of service, delivery, trash and outdoor equipment or storage areas should be minimized, particularly relative to views from public roadways and pedestrian corridors. Thoughtful placement and integration into the architecture and site design is a priority for all sites. • Orient service entrances, loading docks, waste disposal areas and other similar uses toward service roads and away from major streets and primary building entrances. • Locate loading, service, trash and delivery areas so they do not encroach on any setbacks. — �- Screen dumpsters with walls and materials that match architecture of primary building Wifed Gify of�lorkviPEe Comprehensive Land Mee Plan Update 27 Design Guidelines Si+e Planning Principles • Avoid locating service areas where they are visible from adjacent buildings or where they may impact view corridors. Such facilities are more appropriate at the DWI rear of buildings or sites. • Trash enclosures must be located away from residential property lines. { 1 • Wherever possible, coordinate the locations of service areas between screen dumpsters with walls and materials that adjacent users or developments, so that match sters architecture wall ofd maryials that service drives can be shared. • Locate parking areas for outdoor equipment, trucks, trailers, service vehicles, etc. away from public parking lots and major pedestrian circulation routes. Unless totally out of view, screen these areas architecturally and with landscaping. • All proposed dumpsters,trash receptacles, refuse storage containers, outdoor storage, and ground mounted equipment should be located within an enclosure providing screening along with landscaping along the perimeter. Such enclosures shall repeat materials and elements on the primary building. Lw+eJ Gify of Yc)P- vide GoMpeeke-hs'ive Land LAse Plan Ltpda+e 28 Design Guidelines Landscape principles Landscape Principles Landscape guidelines are essential for reflecting and enhancing the distinct character of the City. The standards and requirements for the installation of landscaping and screening walls throughout the City are set forth in order to: • Enhance Yorkville's sense of place. • Promote the general welfare of the community. • Enhance the living environment. • Aid in the enhancement of property values. • Create an attractive, consistent appearance. • Complement the visual effect of buildings. • Provide appropriate buffers between land uses. • Support the landscape character of the City. • Use sustainable practices to reduce the impact of the built landscape on the natural ecosystem. PRINCIPLE 9: Provide a unified landscape treatment throughout the City through the use of consistent right-of-way and buffer treatments. PRINCIPLE 10: Enhance the aesthetic appearance of development and lessen the impact of undesirable site components through the effective use of landscaping. PRINCIPLE 9• Provide a unified landscape treatment throughout the City through the use of consistent right-of-way and buffer treatments ■ Landscape Character The overall character of the City will be enhanced in large part by the landscaping found throughout the City. To enhance the overall desired character throughout the City: Gateway yhifed Ofy of N20P Wlle Comprehensive Lavid Llse ?fan Vpdafe 29 i Design Guidelines Landscape principles • Landscaping will be done in informal clusters to create a more natural appearance. • Street lighting will be kept to a minimum. • Meandering sidewalks will be located throughout the City in the landscape buffers. ■ "Gateway" Corridor Landscape Treatments • Primary Gateway Corridors Several major corridors lead residents and visitors into the City of Yorkville. The visual experience along these "Gateways" is critical to the overall perception and character associated with Yorkville. Due to the importance of these "Gateways" and the Influence they have on the identity for the City, specific criteria have been added to these guidelines to ensure that an attractive landscape appearance is maintained as properties are developed adjacent to these primary corridors. The primary corridors identified for specific landscape buffers include: I i Scenic vista • Route 47 • Route 126 • Route 71 • Prairie Parkway and Caton Farm Road Primary Gateway Residential Buffer Requirements All residential development adjacent to the primary "Gateway' corridors must have a landscape buffer of 100 feet or more measured from the edge of the ultimate right-of-way. Residential land uses require 0 larger depth buffers to allow for berms, tree ; preservation, view shed protection, noise barrier and separation of residential areas from the roadway. However, where scenic vistas are prominent along a"Gateway"corridor(such as Route 71)the buffers should be designed in a manner which frames the Preserve existing trees for Gateway buffers distant views. Development plans should consider creative means to preserve the sight lines which currently provide the scenic views that define the rural character of Yorkville. Landscape plans within the buffers should have an informal quality to capture the natural feel of the rural landscape. To enhance the rural identity, additional elements should be considered when designing the buffers, i.e. incorporating split rail fencing, using plant material to frame scenic vistas and preservation of existing vegetation and tree lines to maintain the rural quality of Yorkville. Uvtife-d Gify of YoPWIle- Gomprekehsive Lcmd CAse plan L loc6te 30 Design Guidelines Landscape Principles Non-Residential Buffer Requirements For all non-residential development, a 25 foot minimum landscape buffer is required along the primary"Gateway" corridors. The 25 ft. buffer allows for a meandering walk within the buffer and provides more area for plant clusters and massing. Focus should be placed on site entrances by highlighting entries with ornamental landscaping to signal the access point. The landscape buffer width must be measured from the edge of the ultimate right-of- way. All buildings must be set back a minimum of 150 feet from the ultimate right-of-way line. ry �y Nan-residential planting requirements • Secondary Gateway Corridors In addition to the primary gateway corridors leading into the City, several additional roadways have been identified as secondary gateway corridors, possessing unique and attractive qualities which also define the character of the City. Development along these secondary corridors should be carefully evaluated to ensure the inherent rural character of Yorkville is preserved. These roadways include: • Fox Road • High Point Road • Legion Road • Van Emmon Road • Collectors identified on the City Thoroughfare Plan L vae. } Coy of y)o, lkville- Campveke-nsive Land Llse Plan Ltpclafe 311 Design Guidelines Landscape principles Secondary Gateway Residential Buffer Requirements All residential development adjacent to the secondary "Gateway' corridors must have a landscape buffer in the range of 50 to 100 feet measured from the edge of the ultimate right-of- way. However, where scenic vistas are prominent along a "Gateway' corridor (such as Route 71) �� „y the buffers should be designed in a manner w <1 which frames the distant views. Development plans should consider creative means to preserve the sight lines which currently provide Landscape bolter the scenic views that define the rural character of Yorkville. Landscape plans within the buffers should have an informal quality to capture the natural feel of the rural landscape. To enhance the rural identity, additional elements should be considered when designing the buffers, i.e. incorporating split rail fencing, using plant material to frame scenic vistas and preservation of existing vegetation and tree lines to maintain the rural quality of Yorkville. • General Planting Requirements Proper installation and maintenance of landscape plantings is essential to N°m+•e°°or° • M1a° be Paced vnlFle IM1e 9 ded achieving the desired character reaUhal.a°d°bN�°°IhO throughout the City. The following I,.R. requirements specify critical considerations for landscape plantings. ._P 9mrll ,F.' °'•,�` • All landscaping shall be separated from vehicular use areas by some form of barrier such as raised QD Ure concrete curbing, bollards, curb stops or other suitable permanent alternative. .. Z, N. a,leeca°r".a.sh'vll P aq/ • Landscaping shall not obstruct the be P�.e.dl6N the ffiad.d view between access drives and vgw oliehlauw T` parking aisles, nor shall any i landscaping which obstructs views Sight lines at intersection be located in the radius of any curb return. • No artificial plant material may be used to satisfy the requirements of this section. • In residential developments, planting strips should be in proportion to the width of the street and the building setbacks. Coordinate tree plantings with utility locations to avoid conflicts. United City of X20t-cville Compeekehsive Lancl Lose Plavr Update 32 Design Guidelines Landscape PI-inciples • At the intersection of two streets, or at the intersection of a commercial driveway and a street, nothing shall be erected, placed or planted that will impede vision between the height of 3 feet and 10 feet above the curb within a triangle formed by the intersecting streets or street and driveway, and measuring 40 feet along the sides of the triangle that face the intersection. Triangle sides shall be measured from the face of the curb to the face of the curb at intersections and driveways. PRINCIPLE 10• Enhance the aesthetic appearance of development and lessen the Impact of undesirable site components through the effective use of landscaping • Intersections and Site Entrances Intersections and development entrances should be identified with ornamental landscaping coordinated with the signage. Clearly enhancing the entrances with landscaping and lighting will help identify key access points and add to the aesthetic appeal of the City. i" • Landscaping Adjacent to Non-Residential Buildings • Incorporate planting beds into plazas to create shade . , and add human scale. • Consider evergreen trees to create wind-blocks ornamental plantings accent entrance against prevailing winter winds. • Accent entrances and architectural elements with ornamental plantings. • Landscaped islands shall be planted with seasonal color and/or groundcover. f , • Use plantings adjacent to buildings and along walkways to soften the experience. _ • Mature trees should be pruned of branches up to 9 feet high to maintain safe pedestrian passage. Incorporate landscape beds and planters at key entryways and seating areas. Plantings along building soften edge • Landscaping is encouraged at pedestrian crossings and seating areas. However, consideration should be given to vehicular/pedestrian sight lines. ff Explore opportunities to break up large expanses of pavement. LAP,ifed City of Yaekvi16 Go,nprelnensive Land IAse plan LApdafe 33 Design Guidelines Landscape principles • Parking Lot Landscaping • Landscape islands are required at the — terminus of each parking bay. Within 'oW. each island, 2 shade trees or 2 "" " " ornamental trees shall be planted. The ground plane shall be seeded with grass, mulched or planted with groundcover. vroiw un.Ja _ • Avoid more than 10 parking stalls in a row without a landscaped island.• _ • 10 foot landscape median is required :o' z- A between every other parking bay. Medians are required between every other parking bay • Every parking stall must be located within 60 feet of a tree. • Unimproved Pad Sites All portions of the development site not occupied by buildings, structures, vehicle access and parking areas, loading/unloading areas and approved storage areas shall be landscaped. Future building pads within a phased development shall be kept in a neat and orderly manner though no landscaping is required. • Dumpster/Trash Receptacles/Outdoor Storage All proposed dumpsters, trash receptacles, refuse storage containers and outdoor storage = shall be located within an enclosure providing screening by means of combining the following landscape elements: • Decorative masonry wall with a non- masonry gate, a minimum of 6 feet in height. The construction materials of the wall shall match material used on the principal building. -J • Large shrubs and small trees shall be r arranged as foundation planting around the perimeter of the pad area. The opening,for Screen dumpsters with walls and landscaping the equipment however shall not be obstructed. The above landscape requirements do not apply when the enclosure is an architectural extension of a principal building or where service areas are not visible. Place utility boxes at the rear of structures and screen with berms and/or landscaping lAnif-ad Gify of)!arkvilla GampNeinensrve .hand (Asa Dian tApdafe 34 rr United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Ear 1 I '1898 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 p 11 :i o PTelephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 PC# QZ69- 21 APPLICATION & PETITION FOR CONCEPT PLAN REVIEW AND COUNTY MILE AND ONE-HALF REVIEW PLEASE CIRCLE nine PUD AmenPE nt Annexation &Zonina Rezonino PUD Amendment 1 %Mile Revie Development Name: LOREN MILLER Date of Submission: 1. Name ofPetitioner(s): LORENIII= Address: PO BOX 355 Phone Number: 630-553-1738 Fax Number: Email Address: Relationship of Petitioner(s)to subject property: JQwner ]] Developer [] Contract Purchaser 2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from#1: TORF.f4 P=R and RHONDA L MIT T T'R If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: 3. a). Street address and physical location of subject property: 2450C CAANONBALT., BRTSTOT.� TT. 6(1512 b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit"A". c). Total Acreage: 0.753 d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s)of property: 02,16-426-010 e). Current Zoning Classification: AG 0. Zoning Classification Sought: M-1 _ g). Is this property within City limits? Yes vy No, requesting annexation (If no is checked, is the property contiguous with existing City boundaries? Yes XX No) Page I of 5 United City of Yorkville Concept/1-1/2 mile Review Application Revised: 11/28/06 4. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: Attorney: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: Engineer: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: Land Planner: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: 5. If 1 % Mile County Review, what is county zoning currently? AC Requested Zoning: M-1 Zoning of surrounding parcels: North: A- 1 South: A-1 East: R- 3 West: U- i 6. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description. b. 15 copies each of the application, proposed drawings, location map, site plan are needed to be scheduled for the staff review meeting. c. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to Page 4 of this application 'Petitioner Route, Step 1 , Fees" and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount). d. One CD containing one electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with exhibits), proposed drawings, location map, and site plan. For the Plan Commission Meeting, an additional submittal is need as follows: d. Concept Plan: 35 sets folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope e. 35 copies of the application with legal description. Page 2 of 5 United City of Yorkville Concept/]-1/2 mile Review Application Revised: 11/28/06 In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct. Date: July 30 , 2008 Petitioner(s) Signature: Loren E Miller .john Russ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 30t-h day of / )._7111 ;Ir 200 g =PUBLIC. ALEK NAL Notary eal ALEK rY NOE OF ILLINOIS MV ES 11/08/2011 THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. CONCEPT PLAN and COUNTY MILE AND ONE-HALF REVIEW PETITIONER ROUTE Page 3 of 5 United City of Yorkville Concept/1-112 mile Review Application Revised: 11/28/06 RE : Loren Miller 2450C Cannonball Bristol , IL 60512 PIN : 02- 16-426-010 That part of fhe Southeast Quarter, of _Section 16, Township !North, 1 conge 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian described fn/1ow: : L'ommencing of the Northeast corner of said uff:east Qr.! >rter, thence South 1 '22 '31 " East along the East line . syf soid 5outhpemd ,Quarter 36524 feet for the point of beginning, North 12,231 ' West along the East line of said Southeast ,:sorter 365, 24 feet to the Northeast corner thereof, thence : a=.✓fh 874,7', ? " West along the North lme of said Southeast nrr ter 86. 96 feet, thence .South 037' East 99. 09 feet, thence x: th 87'4.3x2 '" Most 10525 feet; thence South 77'1240 "" East 1;618. 16 feet; thence South 037' East 209. 00 feet to a line drawn 'earth 74 ' 71 '0,9 " West from the point of beginning- thence South 4," Lt1 " E"<:ist along said line 9550 feet to the point of x>ginnincr in E3oistn/ Township, Kendall County" Illinois. Platof Survey and Zoning Sketch of Part of the Southeast Quarter of 16—J7 7 Bristol Township Kendall County Alin 0 0 s N t Kider °! 15 1 Ag 16 / 6¢ . ,ASPholt 86. 96' \ 11 Northeaqst corner of �I \ the Sodtheast Ouarter \ ASPhall - \ '�; I�" , �- 11 `of Sec4fon 16-37-- 7 M' 6°n a4s k _ \ ' I p!d 5��°rld� 16 ` G / i - X C,4.3. 75 El E11 ; 7 �9 �\ Phall ! Story t 1 / � FO( no ASPho" Fram e alndd in Story atal B ai 4 t one OCrete /X6¢3.6 6arage mt w, M2 _ l-S8.7. 3'32 "W 1 2 " ` w y�+ ` `\q \ sus 1 er Who 0. ; N°rOld Ag Kja RLN. 02-16-426-010 L I ' 318CPresent Zoning AG vez° I!t 1 , i r, , v , Proposed Zoning M-1 j0mes PO 9 i' i r ' mi \'i \ �rl �• fl i ® /ndicates /ran Stoke Found Soils as indicated in "Soil is Indicates Indicates Utility Pole Survey of Kendall County, � — E — /ndicates Overhead Utilities Illinois. ILI� � � I ��\ - -- 641 - - - Indicates Existing Contours 103 Houghton muck r " eancrefe I X /ndicates Existing Elevation 318C Lorenzo loam 643.62 325B Dresden silt loom ; ; /54 ; v ti 1 b ' Legal Description: That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian described it as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said til Southeast Quarter; thence South 122 :31 " East along the East line Story i ! of said Southeast Ouarter 365.24 feet for the point of beginning; d I one cCae m ! thence North 12231 " West along the East line of said Southeast % o ; and Me'a+ Building ; \ Quarter 365.24 feet to the Northeast corner thereof- thence j t - South 8743'32° West along the North line of sold Southeast Quarter 86. 96 feet; thence South 037' East 99. 09 feet, thence / South 874332" West 705.25 feet; thence South 7771240 " East 108. 16 feet; thence South 0:37' East 209. 00 feet to a line drown I North 7431 09" West from the point of beginning,• thence South 743109" East along said line 95. 50 feet to the point of I beginning in Bristol Township, Kendall County, Illinois. - - - - - - - - L \ 1 S� ti i ¢3i0•�t�.. State of Jllino/s" 9550' SS 638 � County of Kendall. I This is to certify that we, domes M. Olson Associates, Ltd., IJJinals Professional Land a�9\ Surveyors, have surveyed and located improvements on the forego%ng described property as shown by the plat hereon drawn which %s a correct representation of said survey. 777t's - - - professional service conforms to the current Illinois Minimum Standards for a Boundary Survey. ` The field work was completed on April 23, 2008. Dated at Yorkville, lllino%s June 6, 2008. Prepared for.• PR0=SIQlI a. domes M Olson P tnrao >I. RNEIOr Illinois Professional Land Surveyor No. Loren Miller Ep';" `.,'.:y ? 2253License expires November 30, 2008 28 Hickory Lane `.' i James M. Olson Associates, Ltd. Yorkville, Illinois 60560 107 West Madison Street Yorkville, Illinois 60560 (630) 553-0050 Miller No. 9443 `QED C/1Y ,2 s Memorandum Q To: Plan Commission EST , \_: 1836 From: Travis Miller and Stephanie Boettcher (�l CC: Annette Williams (for distribution) 9 p~ Date: September 3, 2008 Subject: PC2008-21 Loren and Rhonda Miller (1% Mile Review) LE Application to Kendall County: The petitioner is seeking County M- 1 zoning classification in their application. The current use of the property is an automotive body shop. The petitioner is requesting the change of zoning in order to comply with the business' state license/permit requirement. Comprehensive Plan Recommendation for the Property The 2002 Comprehensive Plan recommends Commercial for the property. The intent of Commercial is: "... to promote market-sensitive development of commercial uses within strategically located areas to efficiently, effectively, and conveniently serve the growing local population, while continuing the importance of the United City of Yorkville as a regional center. " Staff Comments and Recommendations: • Staff recommends the M- I rezoning is appropriate, despite the Comprehensive Plan recommendation, for the property given the existing use of the property and the surrounding land uses, specifically northwest of the subject property. • Given the existing use of the property, in which vehicles are stored onsite (outdoors), and that the property adjacent (to the south) is in a residential zone, the property should be enclosed by a solid wall/fence at least 8' in height per the County's M- I zoning classification. • Seeing as the subject property does not have street frontage, an access easement shall be provided between the adjacent parcel to the northwest and the subject property, in order to provide access to the property from Cannonball Trail. If this easement already exists, the record number should be referenced on the Plat of Survey and Zoning Sketch. • Given the property does not have street frontage; a front yard will have to be identified in order to determine the proper setbacks for the property. • (see Anna Kurtzman's August 22, 2008 report regarding Zoning Ordinance evaluation) • The subject property is contiguous to the corporate boundary of Yorkville and could be annexed. Based on the current lack of utility services for the property, and the fact that the petitioner is not proposing any change of use or redevelopment of the property, staff is not recommended annexation. United City of Yorkville County Seat of Kendall County essr ® 1836 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 �n Telephone: 630-553-4350 �9 =O Fax: 630-553-7264 AIL `v�? Website: www.yorkville.il.us TO: Charles Wunder August 22, 2008 FROM: Anna B. Kurtzman SUBJECT: PC2008-21 Loren Miller 1.5 Mile review (request to rezone from Ag to M-1) The Department of Building Safety staff has reviewed the materials submitted for the case listed above and offer the following comments: 1. The application indicates that the parcel number for this property is 02-16-426-010. A review of the County's records indicates that this parcel is strictly a rectangle, and does not include a notch as depicted on the Plat of Survey. This discrepancy should be explained by the applicant. 2. The application indicates that the petitioner is seeking to rezone the property from Unincorporated Kendall County Ag to Unincorporated Kendall County M-1. The City's Future Land Use Map shows this area developing as residential not industrial. 3. The bulk standards for the City's M-1 district is as follows: a. Front Yard: 25 feet b. Side Yard: 10% of lot width, not to exceed 20 feet c. Rear Yard: No setback listed d. Lot Coverage: 60% e. Floor Area Ratio: 0.8 4. The City's zoning code defines lot frontage as that lot line adjacent to either public or private street. This parcel does not meet this definition. Therefore,compliance with the City's setback standards cannot be determined at this time. 5. No legal access to this parcel is denoted in any of the paperwork provided to the City. 6. It does not appear that this site meets the City's parking requirements in that the parking area is not paved or striped. 7. Staff was unable to determine how many parking spaces need to be provided as no information was provided regarding the current and proposed uses of the property. Parking ratios are located in Section 10-11-4 of the City's Municipal Code. /abk Filename: \\CoyserveAUser Foldm\AKunzman\My Documents\Miller 1.5 mile review\review memo8-22-08abk.doc PC 2008-21 Miller 1 Y2 Mile Review — Location Map LT 1°rT6lr_ H 3 " - - Q s i ILL�y� L^� �o _���� � � •J♦;\�. u]In rrR 1,= / PriUirie MTdows United City of Yorkville GlS The Data S provided wfamut werraidy or anympresentaYon of e y acuuracy,timelh�ess,ar completeness.FL is N,e respunsihtlkyorlhe J. Parcel Data and Aerial Photography defermhm accuracy,.finWiness,completeness,and Provided By Kendall County GIS approprlateme of&uxe.Tie,Untted crcyoerarnWne roles no R rnogles,uplesaed or(mplled,to the use ofihe Dab.