Loading...
City Council Packet 2013 09-10-13 Co. Zo o United City of Yorkville 4 esr 1836 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 'p `M l ty Fax: 630-553-7575 <LE AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 10, 2013 Call to Order: Pledge of Allegiance: Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD 11 WARD III WARD IV Carlo Colosimo Jackie Milschewski Chris Funkhouser Rose Ann Spears Ken Koch Larry Kot Joel Frieders Diane Teeling Establishment of Quorum: Amendments to Agenda: Presentations: Public Hearings: Citizen Comments on Agenda Items: Consent Agenda: Minutes for Approval: Bills for Payment (Informational): $513,678.73 Mayor's Report: 1. CC 2013-62 Resolution of Support for State Funding of the Northern Route 47 Corridor Public Works Committee Report: 1. PW 2013-36 Kendall Marketplace Infrastructure 2. PW 2013-38 2013 Road to Better Roads Program a. Contract Award for MFT Work b. Contract Award for Non-MFT Work Economic Development Committee Report: 1. EDC 2013-28 Ordinance Approving a Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area (Imperial Investments, LLC) Public Safety Committee Report: Administration Committee Report: Park Board: City Council Agenda September 10, 2013 Page 2 Plan Commission: 1. PC 2013-09 and PC 2013-10 1100 McHugh Road(Occhipinti)Request for Annexation and Zoning 2. PC 2013-12 and PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville—Yorkville Christian School a. Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of an Amended Annexation Agreement b. Ordinance Approving the Resubdivision of Lot 358 of the Prestwick Unit One Final Plat Zoning Board of Appeals: City Council Report: City Clerk's Report: Community and Liaison Report: Staff Report: Additional Business: Executive Session: 1. For the discussion of minutes of meetings lawfully closed under the Open Meetings Act, whether for purposes of approval by the body of the minutes or semi-annual review of the minutes. 2. For litigation, when an action against, affecting, or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting. Citizen Comments: Adjournment: COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES '----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------: -ADMINISTRATION:_September 19,2013-6:00_p.m.—City Hall Council Chambers ------ ------ --------- --------------------------- ------------------------------ --- ------- ------------------------- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Spears Finance Library Vice-Chairman: Alderman Milschewski Administration Committee: Alderman Funkhouser Committee: Alderman Frieders :ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:October_1,2013-7:00 p.m._—City Hall Council Chambers ----------------- -------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------ Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Koch Community Development Plan Commission Vice-Chairman: Alderman Teeling Building Safety and Zoning Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp. Committee: Alderman Colosimo Kendall Co. Plan Commission Committee: Alderman Frieders City Council Agenda September 10, 2013 Page 3 COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES (cont'd) :PUBLIC-SAFETY-: October , 2013 —6:30 p.m -—City Hall Council- -Chambe- rs -------------------------------------3------------------------------- --------------------------- ----------------------------- Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Colosimo Police Human Resource Comm. Vice-Chairman: Alderman Spears School District Committee: Alderman Kot Committee: Alderman Funkhouser -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� ;PUBLIC WORKS:-Septem_ ber 17.2013_—6:00 p.m_._—C_it_yHall Council Chambers _ Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Teeling Public Works Park Board Vice-Chairman: Alderman Kot Engineering YBSD Committee: Alderman Milschewski Parks and Recreation Committee: Alderman Koch UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 10, 2013 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BILLS FOR PAYMENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Bills for Payment(Informational) ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR'S REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2013-62 IDOT 5-Year Highway Program—Resolution of Support for Yorkville Projects ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- l. PW 2013-36 Kendall Marketplace Infrastructure ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2013-38 Road to Better Roads Program a. Contract Award for MFT Work ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed b. Contract Award for Non-MFT Work ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2013-28 Ordinance Approving a Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area(Imperial Investments, LLC) ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLAN COMMISSION REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- l. PC 2013-09 &PC2013-10 1100 McHugh Road(Occhipinti) Request for Annexation and Zoning ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PC 2013-12 &PC2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville—Yorkville Christian School a. Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of an Amended Annexation Agreement ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to b. Ordinance Approving a Final Plat ❑ Approved: Y N ❑ Subject to ❑ Removed ❑ Bring back to Committee/future meeting ❑ Informational Item ❑ Notes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPORTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number d J $ •n Legal : Bills for Payment Finance ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ -_� City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources E]� wn sw �© Community Development ❑ Police ❑ Public Works ❑ Parks and Recreation ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Bills for Payment (Informational): $513,678.73 Meeting and Date: City Council — September 10, 2013 Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: None—Informational Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Amy Simmons Finance Name Department Agenda Item Notes: DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516025 AACVB AURORA AREA CONVENTION 073113-ALL 08/23/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-JULY 2013 ALL 01-640-54-00-5481 30.58 02 SEASONS HOTEL TAX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 30.58 * 073113-HAMPTON 08/20/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-JULY 2013 01-640-54-00-5481 4,227.25 02 HAMPTON INN HOTEL TAX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 4,227.25 * 073113-SUPER 08/20/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-JULY 2013 SUPER 01-640-54-00-5481 1,557.33 02 8 HOTEL TAX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,557.33 * CHECK TOTAL: 5,815.16 516026 ACTION ACTION GRAPHIX LTD 5166 08/15/13 01 STREETS-SIGN 01-410-56-00-5620 205.30 INVOICE TOTAL: 205.30 * CHECK TOTAL: 205.30 516027 AMPERAGE AMPERAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY INC 0464556-IN 06/10/13 01 STREETS-PHOTOCONTROL, BULBS 01-410-56-00-5640 290.20 INVOICE TOTAL: 290.20 * 0473064-IN 08/05/13 01 STREETS-REFRACTOR 01-410-56-00-5640 88.43 INVOICE TOTAL: 88.43 * CHECK TOTAL: 378.63 516028 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 610-8164257 08/20/13 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 23.50 1 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 2 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516028 ARAMARK ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 610-8164257 08/20/13 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 23.50 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 23.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 70.50 * 610-8173453 08/27/13 01 STREETS-UNIFORMS 01-410-56-00-5600 23.50 02 WATER OP-UNIFORMS 51-510-56-00-5600 23.50 03 SEWER OP-UNIFORMS 52-520-56-00-5600 23.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 70.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 141.00 516029 ATT AT&T 1500622203 08/10/13 01 ADMIN-ROUTER SERVICE 01-110-54-00-5440 466.12 INVOICE TOTAL: 466.12 * CHECK TOTAL: 466.12 516030 AUTOZONE AUTO ZONE, INC. 2247567329 08/09/13 01 WATER OP-ELECTRONIC FLASHER 51-510-56-00-5628 15.06 INVOICE TOTAL: 15.06 * CHECK TOTAL: 15.06 516031 BATTERYS BATTERY SERVICE CORPORATION 236621 08/23/13 01 STREETS-BATTERY TESTER 01-410-56-00-5630 29.95 02 STREETS-12V BATTERY 01-410-56-00-5628 87.50 03 SEWER OP-12V JAPANESE 52-520-56-00-5628 179.95 04 SPECIALTY BATTERY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 297.40 CHECK TOTAL: 297.40 2 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 3 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516032 BEHRD DAVID BEHRENS 090113 09/01/13 01 SEWER OP-AUGUST 2013 MOBILE 52-520-54-00-5440 45.00 02 EMAIL REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 516033 BPAMOCO BP AMOCO OIL COMPANY 38903385-PD 08/24/13 01 POLICE-GASOLINE 01-210-56-00-5695 296.07 INVOICE TOTAL: 296.07 * CHECK TOTAL: 296.07 516034 BUILDERS BUILDERS ASPHALT LLC 10013 08/05/13 01 MFT-ASPHALT 15-155-56-00-5634 399.35 INVOICE TOTAL: 399.35 * 10108 08/12/13 01 MFT-ASPHALT 15-155-56-00-5634 1,235.29 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,235.29 * 10121 08/13/13 01 MFT-ASPHALT 15-155-56-00-5634 1,978.13 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,978.13 * 10149 08/15/13 01 MFT-ASPHALT 15-155-56-00-5634 834.47 INVOICE TOTAL: 834.47 * CHECK TOTAL: 4,447.24 516035 CALLONE UNITED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS 1010-7980-0000-0813 08/15/13 01 ADMIN-JULY ADMIN PHONE CHARGES 01-110-54-00-5440 256.30 02 ADMIN-JULY CITY HALL NORTEL 01-110-54-00-5440 274.66 03 POLICE-JULY CITY HALL NORTEL 01-210-54-00-5440 274.66 3 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 4 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516035 CALLONE UNITED COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS 1010-7980-0000-0813 08/15/13 04 WATER OP-JULY CITY HALL NORTEL 51-510-54-00-5440 274.65 05 POLICE-JULY POLICE PHONE 01-210-54-00-5440 723.66 06 CHARGES ** COMMENT ** 07 POLICE-JULY CITY HALL FIRE 01-210-54-00-5440 69.25 08 ADMIN-JULY CITY HA; ; FIRE 01-110-54-00-5440 69.25 09 LIBRARY-JULY PHONE CHARGES 82-820-54-00-5440 92.40 10 PARKS-JULY PHONE CHARGES 79-790-54-00-5440 47.81 11 WATER OP-JULY PW PHONE CHARGES 51-510-54-00-5440 1,299.60 12 RECREATION-JULY PHONE CHARGES 79-795-54-00-5440 159.74 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,541.98 * CHECK TOTAL: 3,541.98 516036 CAMBRIA CAMBRIA SALES COMPANY INC. 34085 08/22/13 01 ADMIN-PAPER TOWEL 01-110-56-00-5610 83.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 83.60 * CHECK TOTAL: 83.60 516037 CARGILL CARGILL, INC 2901259464 08/13/13 01 WATER OP-BULK ROCK SALT 51-510-56-00-5638 2,606.19 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,606.19 * CHECK TOTAL: 2,606.19 516038 CARLSENS CARLSENS ELEVATOR SERVICES INC 60901 07/30/13 01 STREETS-INSTALLED TWO NEW 01-410-54-00-5446 982.66 02 RELAYS ON CONTROLLER FOR ** COMMENT ** 03 ELEVATOR AT CITY HALL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 982.66 61006 08/14/13 01 STREETS-CLEANED AND ADJUSTED 01-410-54-00-5446 311.00 4 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 5 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516038 CARLSENS CARLSENS ELEVATOR SERVICES INC 61006 08/14/13 02 SENSORS ON INFRARED DETECTOR ** COMMENT ** 03 ON ELEVATOR DOOR AT CITY HALL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 311.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 1,293.66 516039 COMED COMMONWEALTH EDISON 6963019021-0813 08/14/13 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 14.79 INVOICE TOTAL: 14.79 * 8344010026-0813 08/21/13 01 STREETS-LIGHTS 01-410-54-00-5480 215.06 INVOICE TOTAL: 215.06 * CHECK TOTAL: 229.85 516040 CONSTELL CONSTELLATION NEW ENERGY 0011195794 08/17/13 01 WATER OP-2224 TREMONT STREET 51-510-54-00-5480 3,461.09 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,461.09 * 0011215171 08/19/13 01 WATER OP-3299 LEHMAN CROSSING 51-510-54-00-5480 3,558.75 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,558.75 * CHECK TOTAL: 7,019.84 516041 DAVEAUTO DAVID L CHELSEN 20996 08/14/13 01 POLICE-SQUAD REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 348.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 348.00 * 21001 08/15/13 01 POLICE-SQUAD REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 400.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 400.00 * 21006 08/19/13 01 POLICE-SQUAD REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 120.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 120.00 * 5 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 6 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516041 DAVEAUTO DAVID L CHELSEN 21019 08/21/13 01 POLICE-SQUAD REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 700.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 700.00 CHECK TOTAL: 1,568.00 516042 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 15-081413 08/14/13 01 CW CAPITAL-RIVER ROAD BRIDGE 23-230-60-00-6075 27,182.54 02 IMPROVEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 27,182.54 52930 07/25/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-ENBRIDGE 90-045-45-00-0111 374.50 02 PIPELINE MAINTENANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 374.50 52932 07/25/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-AUTUMN CREEK 01-640-54-00-5465 902.00 02 UNIT 2C ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 902.00 52966 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-CENTRAL RT.47 01-640-54-00-5465 16,022.25 02 IMPROVEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 16,022.25 52967 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-GAME FARM/ 01-640-54-00-5465 171.00 02 SOMONAUK IMPROVEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 171.00 52968 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-OVERWEIGHT 01-640-54-00-5465 150.00 02 TRUCK PERMITS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 150.00 * 52969 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-KKCOM MEETINGS 01-640-54-00-5465 256.50 02 AND COORDINATION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 256.50 * 6 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 7 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516042 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 52970 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-CANNONBALL & 01-640-54-00-5465 940.50 02 RT.47 IMPROVEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 940.50 * 52971 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-KENDALL MARKET 01-640-54-00-5465 256.50 02 PLACE IMPROVEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 256.50 * 52972 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-AUTUMN CREEK 01-640-54-00-5465 64.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 64.50 * 52973 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-WINDETT RIDGE 01-640-54-00-5465 1,096.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,096.00 * 52974 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-YORKVILLE 01-640-54-00-5465 725.50 02 MARKET SQUARE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 725.50 * 52975 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-RUSH-COPLEY 01-640-54-00-5465 256.50 02 PHASE lA & STORM RETROFITS ** COMMENT ** 03 IMPROVEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 256.50 * 52976 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-UTILITY PERMIT 01-640-54-00-5465 258.00 02 REVIEWS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 258.00 * 52977 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-KENNEDY ROAD 01-640-54-00-5465 6,580.00 02 IMPROVEMENTS - AUTUMN CREEK ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 6,580.00 * 52978 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-BRIARWOOD 01-640-54-00-5465 1,393.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,393.50 * 52979 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-GRANDE RESERVE 01-640-54-00-5465 432.00 7 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 8 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516042 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 52979 08/14/13 02 AVANTI ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 432.00 * 52980 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-PRESTWICK 01-640-54-00-5465 720.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 720.00 * 52981 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-BLACKBERRY 01-640-54-00-5465 190.50 02 WOODS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 190.50 * 52982 08/14/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-KENDALL 90-039-39-00-0011 617.25 02 CROSSING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 617.25 * 52983 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-CITY OF 01-640-54-00-5465 1,617.00 02 YORKVILLE-GENERAL ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,617.00 * 52984 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-MUNICIPAL 01-640-54-00-5465 1,900.00 02 ENGINEERING SERVICES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,900.00 * 52985 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-PRAIRIE GARDEN 01-640-54-00-5465 396.75 02 SUB. - RESUB. OF LOT 4 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 396.75 * 52986 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-SMOKEY'S SITE 01-640-54-00-5465 250.50 02 IMPROVEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 250.50 * 52987 08/14/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-PRESTWICK 90-055-55-00-0111 300.00 02 UNIT 2 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 * 52988 08/14/13 01 CW CAPITAL-2013 ROAD PROGRAM 23-230-60-00-6025 11,548.53 INVOICE TOTAL: 11,548.53 * 8 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 9 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516042 EEI ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. 52989 08/14/13 01 WATER OP-BRISTOL AV. WATERMAIN 51-510-60-00-6025 5,069.30 INVOICE TOTAL: 5,069.30 5299 08/14/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-PRIORITY 90-044-44-00-0111 454.50 02 HEALTH SITE IMPROVEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 454.50 * 52990 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-RAINTREE 01-640-54-00-5465 2,241.00 02 VILLAGE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 2,241.00 * 52992 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-AUTUMN CREEK 01-640-54-00-5465 7,635.00 02 UNIT 2C ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 7,635.00 * 52993 08/14/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-PRESTWICK 90-055-55-00-0111 3,691.50 02 YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN HS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 3,691.50 * 52994 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-CANNONBALL 01-640-54-00-5465 300.00 02 TRAILS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 300.00 * 52995 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-GREEN ORGANICS 01-640-54-00-5465 171.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 171.00 * 52996 08/14/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-MIDLAND STATE 90-046-46-00-0111 526.50 02 BANK ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 526.50 * 53024 08/14/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-NPDES ANNUAL 01-640-54-00-5465 2,025.00 02 REPORT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 2,025.00 * 53025 08/14/13 01 DOWNTOWN TIF-SITE REMEDIATION 88-880-60-00-6000 4,200.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 4,200.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 100,916.12 9 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 10 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516043 EYEMED FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INS. 6061372 08/23/13 01 ADMIN-SEPT.2013 VISION INS. 01-110-52-00-5224 49.19 02 ADMIN-SEPT.2013 ELECTED 01-110-52-00-5238 45.06 03 OFFICIAL VISION INS. ** COMMENT ** 04 FINANCE-SEPT.2013 VISION INS. 01-120-52-00-5224 26.98 05 POLICE-SEPT.2013 VISION INS. 01-210-52-00-5224 315.52 06 COMM/DEV-SEPT.2013 VISION INS. 01-220-52-00-5224 31.57 07 STREETS-SEPT.2013 VISION INS. 01-410-52-00-5224 58.55 08 ADMIN SERVICES-SEPT.2013 01-640-52-00-5242 48.19 09 RETIREES VISION INS. ** COMMENT ** 10 PARKS-SEPT.2013 VISION INS. 79-790-52-00-5224 83.47 11 RECREATION-SEPT.2013 VISION 79-795-52-00-5224 55.76 12 INS. ** COMMENT ** 13 WATER OP-SEPT.2013 VISION INS. 51-510-52-00-5224 62.32 14 SEWER OP-SEPT.2013 VISION INS. 52-520-52-00-5224 17.90 15 LIBRARY-SEPT.2013 VISION INS. 82-820-52-00-5224 53.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 848.11 CHECK TOTAL: 848.11 516044 FARREN FARREN HEATING & COOLING 8257 08/17/13 01 STREETS-REPLACED BAD OIL 01-410-54-00-5446 2,194.34 02 SAFETY CONTROL AT CITY HALL ** COMMENT ** 03 CENTER, CLEANED CONDENSER ** COMMENT ** 04 COILS, FILLED FREON ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 2,194.34 * 8268 08/23/13 01 STREETS-BEECHER AC REPAIR 01-410-54-00-5446 4,827.92 INVOICE TOTAL: 4,827.92 * CHECK TOTAL: 7,022.26 516045 FIRST FIRST PLACE RENTAL 240134-1 08/06/13 01 STREETS-CONCRETE SAW RENTAL 01-410-54-00-5485 108.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 108.00 * 10 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 11 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516045 FIRST FIRST PLACE RENTAL 240161-1 08/14/13 01 WATER OP-FLAG STAKES 51-510-54-00-5483 284.70 INVOICE TOTAL: 284.70 CHECK TOTAL: 392.70 516046 FLATSOS RAQUEL HERRERA 080713 08/07/13 01 STREETS-GLADIATOR TRAILER 01-410-54-00-5490 180.00 02 TIRES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 180.00 CHECK TOTAL: 180.00 516047 FREDRICR ROB FREDRICKSON 090113 09/01/13 01 FINANCE-AUGUST 2013 MOBILE 01-120-54-00-5440 45.00 02 EMAIL REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 516048 GJOVIKCH GJOVIK CHEVROLET-BUICK-GMC CVCS187321 08/15/13 01 POLICE-SQUAD REPAIR 01-210-54-00-5495 65.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 65.00 CHECK TOTAL: 65.00 516049 GLATFELT GLATFELTER PUBLIC PRACTICE 74974102-9 12/18/12 01 ADMIN SERVICES-LIABILITY INS. 01-640-52-00-5231 6,019.02 02 INSTALLMENT #9 ** COMMENT ** 03 ADMIN SERVICES-PARK & REC 01-640-52-00-5231 1,252.05 04 LIABILITY INS. INSTALLMENT 49 ** COMMENT ** 11 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 12 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516049 GLATFELT GLATFELTER PUBLIC PRACTICE 74974102-9 12/18/12 05 WATER OP-LIABILITY INS. 51-510-52-00-5231 717.32 06 INSTALLMENT #9 ** COMMENT ** 07 SEWER OP-LIABILITY INS. 52-520-52-00-5231 468.41 08 INSTALLMENT #9 ** COMMENT ** 09 LIBRARY-LIABILITY INS. 82-820-52-00-5231 828.20 10 INSTALLMENT #9 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 9,285.00 CHECK TOTAL: 9,285.00 516050 GOLINSKI GARY GOLINSKI 090113 09/01/13 01 ADMIN-AUGUST 2013 MOBILE EMAIL 01-110-54-00-5440 45.00 02 REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 516051 GUARDIAN GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME 082113-DENTAL 08/21/13 01 ADMIN-SEPT.2013 DENTAL INS. 01-110-52-00-5223 394.46 02 ADMIN-SEPT.2013 ELECTED 01-110-52-00-5237 364.51 03 OFFICIAL DENTAL INS. ** COMMENT ** 04 FINANCE-SEPT.2013 DENTAL INS. 01-120-52-00-5223 235.07 05 POLICE-SEPT.2013 DENTAL INS. 01-210-52-00-5223 2,551.51 06 COMM/DEV-SEPT.2013 DENTAL INS. 01-220-52-00-5223 252.97 07 STREETS-SEPT.2013 DENTAL INS. 01-410-52-00-5223 503.25 08 ADMIN SERVICES-SEPT.2013 01-640-52-00-5241 329.09 09 RETIREES DENTAL INS. ** COMMENT ** 10 PARKS-SEPT.2013 DENTAL INS. 79-790-52-00-5223 613.35 11 RECREATION-SEPT.2013 DENTAL 79-795-52-00-5223 331.28 12 INS. ** COMMENT ** 13 WATER OP-SEPT.2013 DENTAL INS. 51-510-52-00-5223 459.68 14 SEWER OP-SEPT.2013 DENTAL INS. 52-520-52-00-5223 116.93 12 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 13 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516051 GUARDIAN GUARDIAN ANGEL HOME 082113-DENTAL 08/21/13 15 LIBRARY-SEPT.2013 DENTAL INS. 82-820-52-00-5223 424.34 INVOICE TOTAL: 6,576.44 082113-LIFE 08/21/13 01 ADMIN-SEPT.2013 LIFE INS. 01-110-52-00-5222 58.52 02 ADMIN-SEPT.2013 ELECTED 01-110-52-00-5236 53.15 03 OFFICIAL LIFE INS. ** COMMENT ** 04 FINANCE-SEPT.2013 LIFE INS. 01-120-52-00-5222 27.69 05 POLICE-SEPT.2013 LIFE INS. 01-210-52-00-5222 413.27 06 COMM/DEV-SEPT.2013 LIFE INS. 01-220-52-00-5222 52.50 07 STREETS-SEPT.2013 LIFE INS. 01-410-52-00-5222 104.60 08 PARKS-SEPT.2013 LIFE INS. 79-790-52-00-5222 76.23 09 RECREATION-SEPT.2013 LIFE INS. 79-795-52-00-5222 52.69 10 WATER OP-SEPT.2013 LIFE INS. 51-510-52-00-5222 68.70 11 SEWER OP-SEPT.2013 LIFE INS. 52-520-52-00-5222 19.31 12 LIBRARY-SEPT.2013 LIFE INS. 82-820-52-00-5222 82.24 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,008.90 * CHECK TOTAL: 7,585.34 516052 HACH HACH COMPANY 8373804 07/03/13 01 WATER OP-CHLORINE 51-510-56-00-5638 136.25 INVOICE TOTAL: 136.25 * 8429286 08/09/13 01 WATER OP-CHEMICALS 51-510-56-00-5638 453.08 INVOICE TOTAL: 453.08 * CHECK TOTAL: 589.33 516053 HDSUPPLY HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS, LTD. B099427 08/06/13 01 WATER OP-UPGRADE MASTER 51-510-56-00-5664 5,010.86 02 COMMUNICATION STAND & SOFTWARE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 5,010.86 CHECK TOTAL: 5,010.86 13 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 14 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516054 HENNE VERNE HENNE CONSTR. & 30112 08/14/13 01 STREETS-NOZZLE, HARDWALL HOSE 01-410-56-00-5628 317.29 INVOICE TOTAL: 317.29 CHECK TOTAL: 317.29 516055 HRGREEN HR GREEN 87677 08/06/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-CANNONBALL & 01-640-54-00-5465 9,677.00 02 RT.47 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 9,677.00 CHECK TOTAL: 9,677.00 516056 ILLCO ILLCO, INC. 1248225 08/14/13 01 STREETS-FILTERS FOR BEECHER 01-410-56-00-5656 47.45 02 CENTER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 47.45 * CHECK TOTAL: 47.45 516057 ILLUMBER IL VALLEY URBAN LUMBERJACKS 12818 08/12/13 01 LAND CASH-TREE REMOVAL 72-720-60-00-6044 1,400.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,400.00 * 12821 08/14/13 01 STREETS-TREE SERVICE 01-410-54-00-5458 3,400.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 3,400.00 CHECK TOTAL: 4,800.00 516058 ILPD4778 ILLINOIS STATE POLICE 081613 08/16/13 01 ADMIN-BACKGROUND CHECKS 01-110-54-00-5462 63.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 63.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 63.00 14 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 15 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516059 IPRF ILLINOIS PUBLIC RISK FUND 12494 07/15/13 01 ADMIN SERVICES-SEPT.2013 01-640-52-00-5231 8,424.68 02 WORKERS COMP. ** COMMENT ** 03 ADMIN SERVICES-PARK&REC SEPT. 01-640-52-00-5231 1, 752.47 04 2013 WORKERS COMP ** COMMENT ** 05 WATER OP-SEPT.2013 WORKERS 51-510-52-00-5231 1,004.01 06 COMP. ** COMMENT ** 07 SEWER OP-SEPT.2013 WORKERS 52-520-52-00-5231 655.63 08 COMP. ** COMMENT ** 09 LIBRARY-SEPT.2013 WORKERS COMP 82-820-52-00-5231 1,159.21 INVOICE TOTAL: 12,996.00 CHECK TOTAL: 12,996.00 516060 JEWEL JEWEL 081913-CITY 08/19/13 01 DOWNTOWN TIF-RED BULL, WATER, 88-880-60-00-6000 57.57 02 MONSTER, FRUIT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 57.57 CHECK TOTAL: 57.57 516061 JIFFY WISCONSIN QUICK LUBE 688560 08/16/13 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE 01-210-54-00-5495 27.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 27.98 688686 08/19/13 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE, CAR WASH 01-210-54-00-5495 48.59 INVOICE TOTAL: 48.59 688788 08/22/13 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE 01-210-54-00-5495 23.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 23.99 688818 08/23/13 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE, CAR WASH 01-210-54-00-5495 42.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 42.98 15 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 16 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516061 JIFFY WISCONSIN QUICK LUBE 691478 08/14/13 01 POLICE-OIL CHANGE, CAR WASH 01-210-54-00-5495 42.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 42.98 CHECK TOTAL: 186.52 516062 KCACP KENDALL COUNTY CHIEF OF POLICE 081513 08/15/13 01 POLICE-ANNUAL MOBILE COMMAND 01-210-54-00-5462 500.00 02 CENTER INSTALLMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 500.00 081513-MTF 08/15/13 01 POLICE-ANNUAL INSTALLMENT FOR 01-210-54-00-5462 1,000.00 02 MAJOR CRIMES TASK FORCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,000.00 081513-SRT 08/15/13 01 POLICE-ANNUAL SRT INSTALLMENT 01-210-54-00-5462 2,000.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 2,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 3,500.00 516063 KENPRINT ANNETTE M. POWELL 19145 08/26/13 01 FINANCE-5,000 AP ENVELOPES 01-120-56-00-5610 437.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 437.60 * 19147 08/28/13 01 WATER OP-500 BUSINESS CARDS 51-510-54-00-5430 33.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 33.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 471.10 516064 LAUTAMEN LAUTERBACH & AMEN, LLP 2579 08/23/13 01 FINANCE-APRIL 30, 2013 - 01-120-54-00-5414 28,000.00 02 PROGRESS BILLING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 28,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 28,000.00 16 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 17 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516065 MARINEBI ARCH CHEMICALS, INC 52105037 07/30/13 01 SUNFLOWER SSA-ALGAE TREATMENT 12-112-54-00-5495 812.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 812.00 CHECK TOTAL: 812.00 516066 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE .40881 08/22/13 01 POLICE-DOOR HANDLE, KEYS, 01-210-56-00-5610 74.25 02 FRAMES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 74.25 35231 07/05/13 01 WATER OP-SERRATED TROWEL 51-510-56-00-5630 2.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 2.99 37506 07/24/13 01 STREETS-WELDABLE TUBES FOR 01-410-56-00-5656 37.13 02 RIVERFRONT PARK ** COMMENT ** 03 WATER OP-SCREWDRIVERS 51-510-56-00-5630 4.95 INVOICE TOTAL: 42.08 37526 07/24/13 01 STREETS-PVC PIPE 01-410-56-00-5656 7.50 02 WATER OP-PVC SAW 51-510-56-00-5630 13.89 INVOICE TOTAL: 21.39 38413 08/01/13 01 STREETS-SIDING FOR STORAGE BLD 01-410-56-00-5656 238.60 INVOICE TOTAL: 238.60 38992 08/06/13 01 STREETS-PAINT, SHIMS, SPONGE 01-410-56-00-5656 10.82 02 RUBBER, CAULK GUN ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10.82 39728 08/13/13 01 LAND CASH-WOOD STAKES, MARKING 72-720-60-00-6044 28.36 02 WHITE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 28.36 * 39966 08/15/13 01 STREETS-VINYL CEMENT PATCH 01-410-56-00-5620 10.49 INVOICE TOTAL: 10.49 * 17 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 18 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516066 MENLAND MENARDS - YORKVILLE 39992 08/15/13 01 STREETS-POLEBARN ZINC SCREW 01-410-56-00-5620 25.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 25.99 * 40008 08/15/13 01 LAND CASH-SIDEWALK 72-720-60-00-6044 99.30 INVOICE TOTAL: 99.30 * 40089 08/16/13 01 STREETS-LAG SCREW 01-410-56-00-5620 3.29 INVOICE TOTAL: 3.29 * 40108 08/16/13 01 STREETS-LEVELS 01-410-56-00-5628 223.20 INVOICE TOTAL: 223.20 * 40472 08/19/13 01 STREETS-COVER 01-410-56-00-5620 2.19 INVOICE TOTAL: 2.19 * 40600 08/20/13 01 STREETS-BATTERIES 01-410-56-00-5620 3.77 INVOICE TOTAL: 3.77 * 40878 08/22/13 01 STREETS-ROLLER FRAME, ROLLER 01-410-56-00-5656 9.85 02 COVERS, PAINT TRAY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 9.85 * CHECK TOTAL: 796.57 516067 MERLIN DEYCO, INC. 25142 08/20/13 01 POLICE-TIRE PLUG 01-210-54-00-5495 14.14 INVOICE TOTAL: 14.14 * 25169 08/22/13 01 POLICE-TIRE PLUG 01-210-54-00-5495 14.14 INVOICE TOTAL: 14.14 * CHECK TOTAL: 28.28 516068 METIND METROPOLITAN INDUSTRIES, INC. 18 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 19 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516068 METIND METROPOLITAN INDUSTRIES, INC. 0000276080 08/19/13 01 SEWER OP-CABLE FOR RIVERS EDGE 52-520-56-00-5613 781.20 02 LIFT STATION ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 781.20 CHECK TOTAL: 781.20 516069 MIDAM MID AMERICAN WATER 95831A 07/29/13 01 WATER OP-EM2-55-56 1-1/4 UPP 51-510-56-00-5640 480.00 02 TAPTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 480.00 95936A 07/31/13 01 SEWER OP-PVC PIPE, COUPLING 52-520-56-00-5640 230.26 INVOICE TOTAL: 230.26 96017A 08/05/13 01 SEWER OP-PVC PIPE, COUPLING 52-520-56-00-5640 450.92 INVOICE TOTAL: 450.92 96087A 08/06/13 01 SEWER OP-PVC PIPE 52-520-56-00-5640 139.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 139.50 CHECK TOTAL: 1,300.68 516070 MIKOLASR RAY MIKOLASEK 082213 08/22/13 01 POLICE-LIABILITY FOR SWAT 01-210-54-00-5415 48.80 02 COMANDER TRAINING MEAL ** COMMENT ** 03 REIMBURSMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 48.80 CHECK TOTAL: 48.80 516071 MUNCLRK MUNICIPAL CLERKS OF ILLINOIS 082713 08/27/13 01 ADMIN-ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 01-110-54-00-5460 90.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 90.00 CHECK TOTAL: 90.00 19 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 20 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516072 NCL NCL EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES 9728 07/31/13 01 COMM/DEV-4" LATH BUNDLE 01-220-56-00-5620 50.32 INVOICE TOTAL: 50.32 * CHECK TOTAL: 50.32 516073 NEOPOST NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST 082513 08/25/13 01 ADMIN-POSTAGE METER REFILL 01-000-14-00-1410 1,000.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 1,000.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 1,000.00 516074 NICOR NICOR GAS 07-72-09-0117 7-0813 08/21/13 01 ADMIN-1301 CAROLYN CT 01-110-54-00-5480 23.85 INVOICE TOTAL: 23.85 * 61-60-41-1000 9-0713 08/13/13 01 ADMIN-610 TOWER LANE 01-110-54-00-5480 11.88 INVOICE TOTAL: 11.88 * 83-80-00-1000 7-0713 08/13/13 01 ADMIN-610 TOWER LANE UNIT B 01-110-54-00-5480 38.17 INVOICE TOTAL: 38.17 * CHECK TOTAL: 73.90 516075 OSWEGO VILLAGE OF OSWEGO 90113 09/01/13 01 ADMIN-AUGUST 2013 PARK & RIDE 01-000-24-00-2460 30.00 02 PROCEEDS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 30.00 CHECK TOTAL: 30.00 516076 PULTE PULTE HOMES 20 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 21 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516076 PULTE PULTE HOMES 2425 SAGE 08/16/13 01 ADMIN-TEMP. OCCUPANCY SURETY 01-000-24-00-2415 5,000.00 02 GUARANTEE REFUND FOR 2425 ** COMMENT ** 03 SAGE CT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 5,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 5,000.00 516077 QUILL QUILL CORPORATION 4823024 08/14/13 01 FINANCE-3 INCH D-RING BINDERS 01-120-56-00-5610 107.91 INVOICE TOTAL: 107.91 * CHECK TOTAL: 107.91 516078 R0000594 BRIAN BETZWISER 090113-58 09/01/13 01 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT-PRINCIPAL 25-215-92-00-8000 2,566.10 02 PYMT #58 FOR 185 WOLF ST. ** COMMENT ** 03 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT-INTEREST 25-215-92-00-8050 4,083.48 04 PYMT #58 FOR 185 WOLF ST. ** COMMENT ** 05 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT-PRINCIPAL 25-225-92-00-8000 80.40 06 PYMT #58 FOR 185 WOLF ST. ** COMMENT ** 07 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT-INTEREST 25-225-92-00-8050 127.94 08 PYMT #58 FOR 185 WOLF ST. ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 6,857.92 CHECK TOTAL: 6,857.92 516079 R0001234 REBECCA SCHNITZ 082213 08/22/13 01 ADMIN-REFUND TOW PAYMENT PER 01-000-43-00-4325 500.00 02 HEARING OFFICER ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 500.00 CHECK TOTAL: 500.00 21 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 22 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516080 RADARMAN CINDY GRISWOLD 2003 08/12/13 01 POLICE-REPLACED KA DIODE 01-210-54-00-5495 161.90 INVOICE TOTAL: 161.90 CHECK TOTAL: 161.90 516081 SERVMASC SERVICEMASTER COMM. CLEANING 163666 08/15/13 01 ADMIN-MONTHLY CITY OFFICE 01-110-54-00-5488 1,196.00 02 CLEANING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 1,196.00 CHECK TOTAL: 1,196.00 516082 SHREDIT SHRED-IT 9402346753 08/07/13 01 POLICE-ON SITE SHREDDING 01-210-54-00-5462 108.51 INVOICE TOTAL: 108.51 CHECK TOTAL: 108.51 516083 SLEEZERJ SLEEZER, JOHN 090113 09/01/13 01 STREETS-AUGUST 2013 MOBILE 01-410-54-00-5440 45.00 02 EMAIL REIMBURSEMENT ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 45.00 CHECK TOTAL: 45.00 516084 SUBURBAN SUN-TIMES MEDIA 600125 07/08/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-RAINTREE 90-056-56-00-0011 322.94 02 VILLAGE PUBLIC HEARING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 322.94 CHECK TOTAL: 322.94 22 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 23 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516085 SUBURLAB SUBURBAN LABORATORIES INC. 30270 08/15/13 01 WATER OP-COLIFORM 51-510-54-00-5429 317.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 317.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 317.00 516086 TAPCO TAPCO 1430324 08/12/13 01 STREETS-PAINT 01-410-56-00-5620 330.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 330.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 330.00 516087 TAPCO TAPCO 1430628 08/15/13 01 MFT-SIGNS 15-155-56-00-5619 413.58 INVOICE TOTAL: 413.58 * 1430939 08/19/13 01 MFT-NO PARKING SIGNS 15-155-56-00-5619 187.45 INVOICE TOTAL: 187.45 * CHECK TOTAL: 601.03 516088 TARGET TARGET BANK 081813-CITY 08/18/13 01 ADMIN-PAPER TOWELS 01-110-56-00-5610 9.50 INVOICE TOTAL: 9.50 * CHECK TOTAL: 9.50 516089 THERMAST THERMASTOR PRODUCTS GROUP 2633729 RI 08/13/13 01 WATER OP-TIMER, RELAY 51-510-56-00-5640 68.59 INVOICE TOTAL: 68.59 * CHECK TOTAL: 68.59 23 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 24 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516090 UPSSTORE MICHAEL J. KENIG 081413 08/14/13 01 ADMIN-2 PKG. TO KFO 01-110-54-00-5452 80.78 02 POLICE-1 PKG. TO SUREFIRE LLC 01-210-54-00-5452 12.53 03 WATER OP-1 PKG. TO ITRON 51-510-54-00-5452 39.88 INVOICE TOTAL: 133.19 * CHECK TOTAL: 133.19 516091 VESCO VESCO 36795 08/23/13 01 ADMIN-LABELING TAPE 01-110-56-00-5610 60.05 INVOICE TOTAL: 60.05 * CHECK TOTAL: 60.05 516092 VISA VISA 082713-CITY 08/27/13 01 ADMIN-MUNICIPAL CLERKS OF IL 01-110-54-00-5412 1,585.00 02 INSTITUTE FEE, IML CONFERENCE ** COMMENT ** 03 REGISTRATION FOR 4 PEOPLE ** COMMENT ** 04 ADMIN-AUGUST INTERNET 01-110-54-00-5440 41.96 05 FINANCE-IGFOA DEBT MANAGEMENT 01-120-54-00-5412 170.00 06 INSTITUE FOR 1 PERSON ** COMMENT ** 07 FINANCE-AUGUST INTERNET 01-120-54-00-5440 41.96 08 FINANCE-STAPLER 01-120-56-00-5610 33.49 09 POLICE-ILEAS CONFERENCE MEALS 01-210-54-00-5415 345.54 10 AND LODGING ** COMMENT ** 11 POLICE-AUGUST INTERNET 01-210-54-00-5440 272.78 12 POLICE-CABLE TIES 01-210-56-00-5610 17.26 13 POLICE-SPEAKER MIC, TACTICAL 01-210-56-00-5620 319.87 14 BOX, EVIDENCE BAGS, DISPOSABLE ** COMMENT ** 15 SURGICAL SCALPELS, SCHEMANTICS ** COMMENT ** 16 ON CRASH RECONSTRUCTION ** COMMENT ** 17 COMM/DEV-AUGUST INTERNET 01-220-54-00-5440 31.47 18 POLICE-GASOLINE 01-210-56-00-5695 52.01 24 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 25 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516092 VISA VISA 082713-CITY 08/27/13 19 STREETS-AUGUST INTERNET 01-410-54-00-5440 41.96 20 ADMIN SERVICES-INTERNET UPKEEP 01-640-54-00-5450 54.92 21 FEE, JULY-OCT. SHOP YORKVEILLE ** COMMENT ** 22 MONTHLY FEE ** COMMENT ** 23 WATER OP-BASIC WATER SUPPLY 51-510-54-00-5412 1,050.00 24 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FOR ** COMMENT ** 25 2 PEOPLE ** COMMENT ** 26 WATER OP-AUGUST INTERNET 51-510-54-00-5440 134.35 27 WATER OP-LAPTOP 51-510-56-00-5635 785.20 28 SEWER OP-AUGUST INTERNET 52-520-54-00-5440 31.47 29 PARKS-AUGUST INTERNET 79-790-54-00-5440 57.70 30 RECREATION-MAGNETIC FILE 79-795-56-00-5606 7.99 31 PARKS-IDLER AXEL, SOFTWARE 79-790-56-00-5640 712.00 32 UPDATE FOR CODE BLUE ** COMMENT ** 33 RECREATION-AUGUST INTERNET 79-795-54-00-5440 57.70 34 RECREATION-PRESCHOOL START UP 79-795-56-00-5606 470.66 35 SUPPLIES, MASKING TAPE, SURGE ** COMMENT ** 36 PROTECTOR, WALL HOOKS, GLUE ** COMMENT ** 37 STICKS, WIPES, HAND SANITIZER ** COMMENT ** 38 RECREATION-STAND 79-795-56-00-5610 3.19 39 RECREATION-CLEANING SUPPLIES, 79-795-56-00-5640 26.95 40 MOUSE TRAPS ** COMMENT ** 41 DOWNTOWN TIF-GIANT ENGRAVED 88-880-60-00-6000 294.00 42 CEREMONIAL KEY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 6,639.43 CHECK TOTAL: 6,639.43 516093 VITOSH CHRISTINE M. VITOSH 1559 07/29/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-PRIORITY 90-044-44-00-0011 13.37 02 HEALTH ANNEXATION PUBLIC ** COMMENT ** 03 HEARING ** COMMENT ** 04 DEVELOPER ESCROW-RAINTREE 90-056-56-00-0011 13.37 25 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 26 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516093 VITOSH CHRISTINE M. VITOSH 1559 07/29/13 05 ANNEXATION & PUD AGREEMENT ** COMMENT ** 06 PUBLIC HEARING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 26.74 * 1562 08/15/13 01 POLICE-AUGUST 7 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 100.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 100.00 * 1565 08/15/13 01 POLICE-AUGUST 14 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 100.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 100.00 * 1566 08/23/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-MIDLAND 90-046-46-00-0011 105.84 02 STATE BANK SPECIAL USE REQUEST ** COMMENT ** 03 DEVELOPER ESCROW-MCHUGH 90-054-54-00-0011 105.84 04 REZONING ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 211.68 * 1569 08/21/13 01 POLICE-AUGUST 21 ADMIN HEARING 01-210-54-00-5467 100.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 100.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 538.42 516094 WALMART WALMART COMMUNITY 082213-CITY 08/22/13 01 ADMIN-PLATES, PAPER TOWEL, 01-110-56-00-5610 44.27 02 HAND SOAP, KLEENEX ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 44.27 CHECK TOTAL: 44.27 516095 WAREHOUS WAREHOUSE DIRECT 2014672-0 07/25/13 01 COMM/DEV-CORRECTION TAPE, 01-220-56-00-5610 16.87 02 LEGAL PADS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 16.87 26 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 27 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516095 WAREHOUS WAREHOUSE DIRECT 2033889-0 08/13/13 01 ADMIN-TWO WAY TAPE, STENO BOOK 01-110-56-00-5610 351.70 02 POST-IT NOTES, PAPER, NOTES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 351.70 * 2034477-0 08/13/13 01 POLICE-NOTES 01-210-56-00-5610 22.40 INVOICE TOTAL: 22.40 * 2037008-0 08/15/13 01 ADMIN-PENS, ADDING TAPE, 01-110-56-00-5610 19.66 02 STAPLES ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 19.66 * 2039258-0 08/19/13 01 POLICE-FOLDERS, MARKERS 01-210-56-00-5610 5.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 5.99 * CHECK TOTAL: 416.62 516096 WERDERW WALLY WERDERICH 082013 08/20/13 01 POLICE-JULY 3, 10, 24 & 31 01-210-54-00-5467 600.00 02 ADMIN HEARINGS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 600.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 600.00 516097 YORKACE YORKVILLE ACE & RADIO SHACK 149734 08/16/13 01 STREETS-OIL HOSE 01-410-56-00-5620 7.98 INVOICE TOTAL: 7.98 * 149753 08/19/13 01 WATER OP-USB CABLE 51-510-56-00-5635 39.99 INVOICE TOTAL: 39.99 * 149795 08/22/13 01 COMM/DEV-SAFETY VEST 01-220-56-00-5620 11.97 INVOICE TOTAL: 11.97 * 27 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 28 TIME: 08:55:40 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/10/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516097 YORKACE YORKVILLE ACE & RADIO SHACK 149837 08/26/13 01 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT-CHALK 25-205-60-00-6060 4.99 02 STICK FOR M10 ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 4.99 CHECK TOTAL: 64.93 516098 YORKGFPC PETTY CASH 081913 08/19/13 01 WATER OP-KANE CO. WATER 51-510-54-00-5412 40.00 02 ASSOCIATION MEETING ** COMMENT ** 03 STREETS-DRINKING FOUNTAIN 01-410-56-00-5656 16.00 04 RELAY ** COMMENT ** 05 WATER OP-POSTAGE FOR UB BILLS 51-510-54-00-5452 54.15 06 WATER OP-PHONE CASE 51-510-54-00-5440 27.05 INVOICE TOTAL: 137.20 * CHECK TOTAL: 137.20 516099 YORKSELF YORKVILLE SELF STORAGE, INC 082213-45 08/22/13 01 POLICE-STORAGE 01-210-54-00-5485 75.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 75.00 * CHECK TOTAL: 75.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 249,897.91 28 DATE: 08/26/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:00:30 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 08/27/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516018 R0001225 MICHAEL COLLINS 20130090-BUILD 08/23/13 01 MUNICIPAL BUILDING-2417 SAGE 16-000-24-00-2445 300.00 02 CT BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** 03 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT-2417 SAGE 25-000-24-21-2445 1,400.00 04 CT. BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** 05 CW CAPITAL-2417 SAGE CT. 23-000-24-00-2445 5,640.00 06 BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** 07 WATER OP-2417 SAGE CT BUILD 51-000-24-00-2445 2,660.00 08 PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 10,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 10,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 10,000.00 29 DATE: 08/28/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 07:42:06 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 08/28/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516019 WILKINSO WILKINSON EXCAVATING, INC. EEI#3 08/15/13 01 ADMIN-FINAL KENDALL MARKET 01-000-24-00-2440 5,029.07 02 PLACE IMPROVEMENTS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 5,029.07 CHECK TOTAL: 5,029.07 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 5,029.07 30 DATE: 08/30/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 13:58:32 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 08/30/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516020 YORKPOST YORKVILLE POSTMASTER 083013 08/30/13 01 WATER OP-POSTAGE FOR 08/31/13 51-510-54-00-5452 2,140.92 02 UTILITY BILLS ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 2,140.92 CHECK TOTAL: 2,140.92 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 2,140.92 31 DATE: 09/03/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 12:46:35 MANUAL CHECK REGISTER ID: AP225000.CBL CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE ITEM CHECK INVOICE # DATE # DESCRIPTION DATE ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 131015 KCR KENDALL COUNTY RECORDER'S 08/29/13 166662 08/29/13 01 DEVELOPER ESCROW-RAINTREE 90-056-56-00-0011 60.00 02 VILLAGE ORDINANCE ** COMMENT ** 03 COMM/DEV-WINDETT RIDGE 01-220-54-00-5466 81.00 04 ORDINANCE ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 141.00 CHECK TOTAL: 141.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 141.00 32 DATE: 09/03/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 12:16:27 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/03/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516021 R0001237 MARGARET MURPHY PARCEL GF014 09/03/13 01 MFT-GAME FARM ROAD PARCEL 15-155-60-00-6073 3,600.00 02 GF014-MURPHY ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 3,600.00 CHECK TOTAL: 3,600.00 516022 R0001238 COSIE ALLEN PARCEL GF029 09/03/13 01 MFT-GAME FARM ROAD PARCEL 15-155-60-00-6073 4,200.00 02 GF029-ALLEN ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 4,200.00 CHECK TOTAL: 4,200.00 516023 R0001239 GARY L. KRITZBERG PARCEL GF031 09/03/13 01 MFT-GAME FARM ROAD PARCEL 15-155-60-00-6073 24,500.00 02 GF031-KRITZBERG ** COMMENT ** INVOICE TOTAL: 24,500.00 CHECK TOTAL: 24,500.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 32,300.00 33 DATE: 09/04/13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAGE: 1 TIME: 08:42:01 CHECK REGISTER PRG ID: AP215000.WOW CHECK DATE: 09/06/13 CHECK # VENDOR # INVOICE INVOICE ITEM NUMBER DATE # DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT # ITEM AMT 516024 R0001226 AMANDA WILLIAMS 20130151-BUILD 08/22/13 01 MUNICIPAL BUILDING-2310 TITUS 16-000-24-00-2445 300.00 02 BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** 03 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT-2310 TITUS 25-000-24-21-2445 1,400.00 04 BUILD PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** 05 CW CAPITAL-2310 TITUS BUILD 23-000-24-00-2445 5,640.00 06 PROGRAM ** COMMENT ** 07 WATER OP-2310 TITUS BUILD 51-000-24-00-2445 2,660.00 INVOICE TOTAL: 10,000.00 CHECK TOTAL: 10,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: 10,000.00 34 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY August 30, 2013 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS ADMINISTRATION $ 12,112.06 $ - $ 12,112.06 $ 1,299.62 $ 878.81 $ 14,290.49 FINANCE 7,271.26 - 7,271.26 780.20 540.07 8,591.53 POLICE 78,879.91 2,973.94 81,853.85 481.95 6,143.83 88,479.63 COMMUNITY DEV. 8,066.87 - 8,066.87 795.40 601.00 9,463.27 STREETS 11,384.55 - 11,384.55 1,221.57 863.99 13,470.11 WATER 12,138.81 110.11 12,248.92 1,314.31 920.45 14,483.68 SEWER 5,216.82 - 5,216.82 559.77 399.09 6,175.68 PARKS 16,850.69 - 16,850.69 1,741.93 1,263.70 19,856.32 RECREATION 9,463.66 - 9,463.66 967.13 708.36 11,139.15 LIBRARY 15,992.94 - 15,992.94 1,003.61 1,223.42 18,219.97 TOTALS $ 177,377.57 $ 3,084.05 $ 180,461.62 $ 10,165.49 $ 13,542.72 $ 204,169.83 TOTAL PAYROLL $ 204,169.83 35 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL BILL LIST SUMMARY Tuesday, September 10, 2013 PA YROL L DATE BI-WEEKLY 8/30/2013 $204,169.83 TOTAL PAYROLL $204,169.83 A CCOUN TS PA YA BL E MANUAL CHECK -#516018-COLLINS BUILD CHECK 8/27/2013 $10,000.00 MANUAL CHECK -#516019-WILKINSON EXCAVATING-KENDALL MARKETPLACE IMPROVEMENTS 8/28/2013 $5,029.07 MANUAL CHECK-#516020-YORKVILLE POST OFFICE-08/31/13 UTILITY BILLS 8/30/2013 $2,140.92 CLERK'S MANUAL CHECK -#131015- KENDALL COUNTY RECORDER 8/29/2013 $141 .00 MANUAL CHECK-#516021 -MARGARET MURPHY-GAME FARM RD. PARCEL GF014 9/3/2013 $3,600.00 MANUAL CHECK-#516022-COSIE ALLEN - GAME FARM RD. PARCEL GF029 9/3/2013 $4,200.00 MANUAL CHECK-#516023-GARY L. KRITZBERG-GAME FARM RD. PARCEL GF031 9/3/2013 $24,500.00 MANUAL CHECK-#516024-WILLIAMS BUILD CHECK 9/6/2013 $10,000.00 BILLS LIST 9/10/2013 $249,897.91 TOTAL BILLS PAID $309,508.90 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS $513,678.73 * ACH Payments # Wire Payments 36 `��13 fry Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number '' �► Legal ❑ Mayor#1 Finance F-1 EST. -�` _ W36 Engineer ❑ �:--- g Tracking Number �! City Administrator ❑ �� �O Human Resources ❑ ALE ` Community Development F-1 CC 2013-62 Police ❑ Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Resolution of Support for State Funding of the Northern Route 47 Corridor Meeting and Date: City Council/ September 10, 2013 Synopsis: Request to pass a resolution stating the City Council's support for state funding of the Northern Portion of Route 47 Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: N/A Action Taken: N/A Item Number: N/A Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. 183fi From: Bart Olson, City Administrator ' CC: Date: September 5, 2013 Subject: Resolution for support of expansion of Northern Route 47 ALE�"►�' Corridor Summary Approval of a resolution of support for the inclusion of funds to construct an expansion of the Route 47 corridor from Kennedy Road in Yorkville to Cross Street in Sugar Grove. Background The City Council last discussed this item in February 2013. At that meeting, we approved a resolution supporting a reallocation of Prairie Parkway earmarked funds from the Route 47 project south of Yorkville to the Route 47 project north of Yorkville. That resolution was received by IDOT,but they acknowledged that they would proceed with funding the southern Route 47 project. Every year, IDOT approves a 6-year highway improvement plan, officially called their Multi- Modal Transportation Improvement Program. For ease of reference, I'll call it the "IDOT Highway Plan." Starting in September and continuing through the middle of October, IDOT officials will be holding public hearings throughout the state to seek comments on: 1) Overall transportation system performance 2) Regional transportation priorities that might affect the development of the next IDOT Highway Plan. 3) Making bicycling a more effective mode of transportation for Illinois' residents and visitors. 4) Projects that should be considered for inclusion in the IDOT Highway Plan 5) How to improve the effectiveness of their public outreach efforts. The public hearings closest to Yorkville are: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 Tuesday, October 1, 2013 4:00—6:00 pm 2:00—6:30 pm Morris City Hall, Community Room Hilton Garden Inn 700 N. Division Street 4070 E Main St(Rt 64) Morris, IL 60450 St Charles, IL 60174 Tuesday, October 8, 2013 Tuesday, October 15, 2013 2:00-6:30 pm 2:00-6:30 pm The Jacob Henry Mansion Estate Hilton Lisle/Naperville 20 S Eastern Ave. 3003 Corporate West Drive Joliet, IL 60433 Lisle, IL 60532 The current IDOT Highway Plan contains funding for phase I engineering for the section of Route 47 from Baseline Road to Cross Street in Sugar Grove (no phase II engineering or construction funding). For the section of Route 47 from Kennedy Road to Baseline Road, the IDOT Highway Plan contains funding for phase I and phase II engineering)no construction funding. In anticipation of staff and elected officials' attendance at the Morris public hearing, we have drafted a resolution of support for full phase II funding and construction funding for the entire stretch of Route 47 from Kennedy Road to Cross Street. The draft resolution has been sent out to the Yorkville Economic Development Committee, Yorkville Chamber of Commerce, and various business owners and developers along the northern Route 47 corridor, including Raging Waves, with a request to those entities to draft their own letter of support and attend a public hearing to voice support for the inclusion of the project in the MOT Highway Plan. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution of support. Resolution No. 2013- RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR STATE FUNDING OF THE NORTHERN ROUTE 47 CORRIDOR WHEREAS, the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, hereinafter called the CITY, has approved Resolution 2013-13 in support of the reallocation of Prairie Parkway earmarked funds from the stretch of Route 47 from Caton Farm Road to 1-80, hereinafter called the Southern Route 47 Corridor, to the stretch of Route 47 from Kennedy Road in Yorkville to Cross Street in Sugar Grove, hereinafter called the Northern 47 Corridor; and WHEREAS, it has become apparent that the State does not wish to reallocate the Prairie Parkway earkmarked funds per our request in Resolution 2013-13; and WHEREAS, the current IDOT FY 2014-2019 Proposed Multi-Modal Transportation Improvement program, hereinafter called the IDOT Highway Program, contains design and construction funding for the Southern Route 47 Corridor; and WHEREAS, the current IDOT Highway Program contains full funding of Phase I engineering costs, half-funding for Phase II engineering costs, and no funds for construction of the Northern Route 47 Corridor; and WHEREAS, approximately $51 million in unallocated funds remain in the Prairie Parkway earmark; and WHEREAS, the cost of expanding the Northern Route 47 Corridor is estimated at $77 million; and WHEREAS, the Northern Route 47 Corridor contains average daily traffic counts between 75% and 291% higher than the average daily traffic counts for the sections of Route 47 between I-80 and Caton Farm Road; and WHEREAS, IDOT's own policies state the average daily traffic capacity of a two-lane highway, similar to Route 47, should be between 8,500 and 12,500 vehicles for safe and efficient operations; and WHEREAS, all of the sections of the Northern Route 47 Corridor has an average daily traffic count exceeding the upper end of that safe usage standard, and none of the sections of the Southern Route 47 Corridor have an average daily traffic count that exceeds the lower end of that safe usage standard; and WHEREAS, the Northern Route 47 Corridor had 300 reported crashes between 2007 and 2011, and the Southern Route 47 Corridor had 97 crashes between 2007 and 2011; and Resolution No.2013- Page 1 WHEREAS, IDOT is holding public hearings throughout the State to take public comment on their IDOT Highway Plan; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, that the IDOT Highway Plan should contain funding for all design and construction costs for the Northern Route 47 Corridor. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , A.D. 2013. CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT JOEL FRIEDERS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of , A.D. 2013. MAYOR Resolution No.2013- Page 2 i i i i Resolution No . 2013 - 03 E RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE REALLOCATION OF PRAIRIE PARKWAY I FUNDS TO THE NORTHERN ROUTE 47 CORRIDOR � i WHEREAS , the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, hereinafter called the CITY , has supported the proposed Prairie Parkway, including the passage of Resolution 2006- 123 on December 26 , 2006 and Resolution 2002 - 1 on February 5 , 2002 ; and WHEREAS , the funds of the federal earmark for the Prairie Parkway were very restrictive in their original purpose, resulting in the stretch of Route 47 between I- 80 and Caton Farm Road being the only segment of Route 47 that met federal earmark designations , and was subsequently funded to P revent loss of the earmarked funds ; and WHEREAS , the Federal Highway Administration has since removed a record of decision on the Prairie Pa rkway, resulting in more flexibility with the Prairie Parkway earmarked funds ; and WHEREAS , approximately $ 51 million in unallocated funds remain in the Prairie Parkway earmark; and i WHEREAS , the cost of expanding tou te 47 bet ween I- 80 and Caton Farm Road ( south of Yorkville) is estimated at $ 99 million , and the cost of expanding Route 47 between Kennedy Road (north of Yorkville) is estimated at $ 77 million ; and WHEREAS , the remaining unallocated funds are far less than the cost of the expanding and reconstructing Route 47 from Kennedy Road to Cross Street; and � i WHEREAS , the stretch of Route 47 from Kennedy Road in Yorkville to Cross Street in Sugar Grove contains average daily traffic counts between 75 % and 291 % higher than the average dal ly traffic counts for the sections of Route 47 between I- 80 and Caton Farm Road ; and WHEREAS , IDOT ' s own policies state the average daily traffic capacity of a two -lane highway, similar to Route 47 , should be between 8 , 500 and 12 , 500 vehicles for safe and efficient operations ; and WHEREAS , all of the sections of Route 47 between Kennedy Road in Yorkville and Cross Street in Sugar Grove have an average daily traffic count exceeding the upper end of that safe usage standard, and none of the sections of Route 47 between I - 80 and Caton Farm Road have an average daily traffic count that exceeds the lower end of that safe usage standard ; and i i WHEREAS , the section of Route 47 between Kennedy Road in Yorkville and Cross Street in Sugar Grove had 300 reported crashes between 2007 and 2011 , and the section of Route � 47 between I - 80 and Caton Farm Road had 97 crashes between 2007 and 2011 ; Resolution No . 2013 - �J Page 1 � I i I NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , by the Mayor and City Council of the United C1t y of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois , that the allocated funds for the expansion and reconstruction of Route 47 from I- 80 to Caton Farm Road should be reallocated to the expansion and reconstruction of Route 47 between Kennedy Road in Yorkville and Cross Street in Sugar Grove. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this oZ �o day of fs6euq4V , A . D . 2013 . i I 17CPuT`�' CITY CLERK i A C RLO COLOSIMO � KEN KOCH � r JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI LARRY KOT i MARTY MUNN S � CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ROSE ANN SPEARS � DIANE TEELING i i i Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois , this �! C? � day of f5F,6PUAPY , A . D . 2013 . 166 i i �r MAYOR � i i �I Resolution No . 2013 - 03 Page 2 Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number 606 Legal ❑ P W #1 Finance ❑ EST. -� __ti 1838 Engineer ■ -- City Administrator ❑ Tracking Number m Human Resources ❑ 3! �"V.* C) Community Development El Police F-1 PW 2013-36 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Kendall Marketplace Improvements Meeting and Date: City Council—September 10, 2013 Synopsis: Update Memo Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator EST. _ 1836 From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. <C Ec° Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: September 3, 2013 Subject: Kendall Marketplace Improvements Background: The City acquired two funds to complete improvements associated with the development of Kendall Marketplace. One fund was to be used for the Cannonball/Beecher Road public improvements (project account balance of$1,779,831.34 *) and the other was to be used for the on-site private punchlist improvements (* improvement account balance of$174,688.46 *). A summary as to the status of where the City is with the completion of the improvements is as noted below: Public Improvements The following work items have been completed or are in the process of being completed: • Intersection improvements at Cannonball Trail and Rt 47 (currently under construction— approx.. $900,000 remaining to complete) • Land acquisition along Cannonball Trail associated with intersection improvements (completed) • Land acquisition at Rt 34 and Beecher(completed) The remaining work items for the public improvements are associated with various punchlist items along Beecher Road. Private Improvements The following work items have been completed or are in the process of being completed: • Various punchlist items on-site. • Grading of park site. The remaining work items for the private improvements are associated with various punchlist items, addressing the deficiencies with the detention basin and completing the park site improvements. Questions Presented: 1. Should the City proceed with the completion of the public improvement punchlist items along Beecher Road? 2. Should the City proceed with the completion of the completion of the on-site punchlist, detention basin improvements, and park site improvements? Discussion: Public Improvements A copy of the current public improvement punchlist is attached for your information. We recommend that we engage Geneva Construction who is our current contractor on the Rt 47 and Cannonball Intersection Improvements to complete the work. The work would be added to the existing contract via change order (see attached price proposal from Geneva Construction - $64,788.05). We estimate that there will still be a significant balance that will remain after the completion of all the work. Private Improvements A copy of a proposal from Encap to complete the necessary work ($52,235) on the detention basin is attached. We are recommending to proceed with the proposal. A copy of the current private improvement punchlist is attached for your information. We recommend that we engage Geneva Construction who is our current contractor on the Rt 47 and Cannonball Intersection Improvements to complete the work. The work would be added to the existing contract via change order (see attached price proposal from Geneva Construction - $52,476.10). We understand that the park site is planned to ultimately be a ball field. As a part of the improvements, the placement of the infield clay and sodding of the outfield is being proposed. City forces are planning on completing this work. We are estimating that this work will cost $15-20,000. We estimate that there will still be a balance that will remain after the completion of all the work. Action Required: Consideration of authorization to proceed with the proposed work as described above. * Account information provided by The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company as of July 2, 2013. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. 2 pages Balances as of EOD 712113 'YORKVILLE 07 SSA 2006-113 (Cannonball/Beecher) 396841 YORKVILLE SSA 07 PROJECT ACCOUNT 34- 396843 YORKVILLE SSA 07 DEBT SERVICE FUND $683,809.07 396845 YORKVILLE SSA 07 RESERVE FUND $1,490,795.11 396846 YORKVILLE SSA 07 Rebate Fund $0.00 396847 YORKVILLE SSA 07 ADMIN. EXPENSE FUND $4,029.32 396848 YORKVILLE SSA 07 SPEC. REDEMPTION FUND $6.60 TOTAL $3,958,471.44 YORKVILLE 07 BUSINESS DISTRICT(Storm Water/Wtr Imp) 396859 YRKVLE BUS DIST 07 DEBT SERV RESERVE_F $340,720.01 396860 YRKVLE BUS DIST 07 SALES TAX ACCOUNT $7.51 396861 YORKVILLE BUS DIST 07 BOND FUND $0.00 396864 YRKVLE BUS DIST 07 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND $17,059.98 396865 YORKVILLE BUS DIST 07 REBATE FUND $0.00 TOTAL $357,787.50 YORKVILLE SALES TAX 2007(Kendall Marketplace) 396923 YORKVILLE SALES TAX 07 DEBT SERV RESER $590,050.21 396924 YORKVILLE SALES TAX 07 1MPROVEMENT FUN $174,688.46_ 396925 YRKVILLE SALES TAX 07 BUS DIST ALLOC F $8.10 396926 YORKVILLE SALES TAX 07 ADMIN EXP. FUND $17,468.23 396927 YORKVILLE SALES TAX 07 REBATE FUND $0.00 397106 YORKVILLE SALES TAX 07BOND FUND $0.00 TOTAL $782,215.00 a' May 31, 2013 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 �� l f Re: Kendall Marketplace United City of Yorkville Kendall County, Illinois Ms. Barksdale-Noble: Representatives from Engineering Enterprises, Inc. performed an onsite punch list inspection of the public improvements for the above referenced project. A summary of the punch list items is listed below: 1. Barricades at the end of Beecher Road should be permanently set into the stone, similar to the one which is already set. 2, Two (2) Type III barricades need to be installed where Gillespie Lane ends. 3. Public sidewalk needs to be installed along the south side of Gillespie Lane, per approved plans. r�? 4. Storm structures #450 and #197 needs to be cleaned and repaired. I �Z 5. A construction entrance needs to be installed at topsoil pile north of Gillespie Lane. r 6. Silt fence must be placed around topsoil pile north of Gillespie Lane. 7. Pavement stripping is required near Isabel Drive and Route 34. 8. There are several areas of damaged curb that need to be removed and replaced (approx. 100 ` FT'). 9. The shared-use path is damaged near Lot 11 and requires repair. 4, 10. There are several areas of damaged surface course that will require milling and replacement. (approx. 100 SY). 11. There are several areas of damaged binder course that will require patching (approx. 100 SY), 52 Wheeler i Road, Sugar Grove, IL 60554 • 1 466-6700 tel — (630) 466-6701 fax—www,eeiw'• • JOB NO: YO1131 PREPARED SY: UP5 DATE: May 31,2013 PROJECT TITLE: Kendall Marketplace Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost ITEM UNIT NO. ITEI41 UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 BARRICADE INSTALLATION LS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000,00 2 PCC SIDEWALK SF 5,500 $ 7.00 $ 38,500.00 3 MISCELLANEOUS STORM SEWER REPAIRS LS 1 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 P� 4 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE INSTALLATION LS 1 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000:00 5 SILT FENCE LS 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000,00 6 PAVEMENT MARKINGS LS 1 $ 1_,500,00 $ 1,500.00 7 REMOVE AND REPLACE 86.12 CURB AND GUTTER FOOT 100 $ 35.00 $ 3,500.00 8 ISHARED USE PATH REPAIR LS 1 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 l� 9 PAVEMENT MILLING Sy 100 $ 15.00 $ 1,500.00 10 ISURFACE COURSE PLACEMENT SY 100 $ 90.00 $ 9,000.00 11 IPAVEMENT PATCHING Sy 100 $ 70.00 $ 7,000.00 12 NIEDIAN ISLAND REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT LS 1 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 SUB-TOTAL ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST $ 85,000.00 10%CONTINGENCY $ 8,500.00 TOTAL ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST $ 93,500.00 G:\Puhlic\Yorkville\2011\Y01131-D Kendall Marketplace Improvements\Punchlist\EOPC Punchlistxls I e rt7! tfif ���°al ^r sh7fv�,erts->•� 1;T=,� . c 1 JOB NO: Y01131 PflEPARED BY: BPS DATE: August 14, 2013 PROJECT TITLE: Kendall Marketplace - Public Improvements - Schedule of Prices ITEM UNIT NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 BARRICADE INSTALLATION LSUM 1 $ $00 03 $ a5oo . 00 2 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 5INCH SQFT 5,500 $ O $ 38 , 64). 40-j 3 SHARED USE PATH REPAIR LSUM 1 $ 1500 . ao $ JIS60. 00 4 MEDIAN ISLAND REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT LSUM 1 $ 'OO , e4 $ a0, a0 5 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 4" FOOT 9098 $ $ 6368040 6 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 6" FOOT 4606 $ 1 . 2* L $ S6.27 . 1p 7 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 12' FOOT 749 $ 2.50 $ 1,812 . 0 8 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 24" FOOT 228 $ $ I m I , o0 9 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LETTERS AND SYMBOLS SQFT 645 $ s' , 7 $ 1J TOTAL $ ,00 Bs ,0 GENEVA CONSTRU ION CO. CAS W. PRICE, VICE PRESIDENT G.\Puhllc\Yorkv! 1e\20111Y01131 D Kendall Markelp ace Irnprovem=np= 0unchas0E0?C Punchlisl x's l - , „IFS; a 119 ,;17 .n,. dJS JOB NO: Y' Y01131 PREPARED BY: BPS _ JUATE: August 14. 2013 PROJECT TITLE: Kendall Market lava - Private Improvements Schedule of Prices ITEM UNIT NO. ITEM _ UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT 1 MISCELLANEOUS STORM SEWER REPAIRS LS 1 $ so04 . oo $ 5000, on 2 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE INSTALLATION LS 1 $ bQ . 64 $ 26 60, ao 3 SILT FENCE LS 1 $ 10%,o . d $ ;L 44% . oa 4 REMOVE AND REPLACE 36.12 CURB AND GUTTER FOOT 150 $ 4j. 00 $ d) SD , o0 5 PAVEMENT MILLING BY 150 $ 10. 0.3 $ IScO , 00 6 SURFACE COURSE PLACEMENT BY 150 $ _ p0 $ SbU6, 6 0 7 PAVEMENT PATCHING BY - 100 4mg, oa $ W , 07 8 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 4° FOOT 13,296 $ O .)0 $ p) , yo 9 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 6" FOOT 3,787 $ , 30 $ 4 0 10 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 121, FOOT 437 $ , j a $ logl'46 Sp 11 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LINE 24' FOOT 776 $ ,$.75 $ 44102 , 00 12 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING - LETTERS AND SYMBOLS SOFT 1 ,360 $ S,7S $ TOTAL $ GENEVA CONSTRUCTION CO. C S W. PRICE, VICE PRESIDENT G:APUbIICIYo(kvINB @011\Y01131-D Kendall MaK,Iplaoe ImprovemerasTunchllelToIzlo PunmistxIs ENCAP in V . Practical Land Ln�r ouement Solutions for Over 35 Years 1 1709 Afton Road Sycamore,IL 60178 Phone:(815)899-1621 Fax:(815)899-6821 www.encapinc net PROPOSAL NO. 13-0411 B April 24, 2013 Ms. Laura Schraw City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 P: 630-553-8574 F: 630-553-7264 RE: Kendall Marketplace- NW Corner of Cannonball and IL Route 34,Yorkville, IL # DESCRIPTION OF WORK_ UNIT #OF UNITS UNIT COST COST 1 Willow Removal & Burn Piles AC 1 $6,160.00 $6,160,00 Erosion Control/Shoreline Stabilization (includes coir log installation,topsoil import, 2 gully repair, seeding) LF 920 $20.00 $18,400.00 3 Inter-Seed Bare Areas on Slopes Acre 1.5 $1,560.00 $2,340.00 Plug Install (Spring 2013, includes 1/2 of the 4 total plugs and enclosures) Each 2000 $3.00 $6,000.00 5 lCattail Control - Herbicide Application Each 2 $'1,150.00 $2,300.00 6 Cattail Control-Cut& Remove Each 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Plug Install (Fall 2013, other 1/2 of plugs and Each 2000 $3.00 $6,000.00 7 enclosures) 2013 Sub-Total $43,200.00 8 Management-2014 (includes 3 site visits) YEAR 1 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 9 Prescribed Burn - Fall 2014 AC 2.2 $925.00 $2,035,00 10 Management-2015 (includes 3 site visits) YEAR 1 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 2014 and 2015 Sub-Total $9,035.00 ITOTAL $52,235.00 Payment Aqreement United City of Yorkville, (hereinafter"Client') shall be solely liable for the timely payment of all amounts invoiced under this proposal. Invoices will be tendered by ENCAP, Inc. ("ENCAP") from time to time, but no more frequently than every two weeks, and shall be due and payable upon receipt. If Client objects to all or any portion of an invoice, Client shall nevertheless timely pay the undisputed amount of such invoice and promptly advise ENCAP in writing of the reasons for disputing any amount. Client shall pay an additional charge of two(2) percent(or the maximum percentage allowed by law, whichever is lower) of the invoiced amount per month for any payment received by ENCAP more than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the invoice,excepting any portion of the invoiced amount in dispute and resolved in favor of Client. Payments shall first be applied to accrued interest and then to the unpaid principal amount. Yorkville -Kendall Marketplace Proposal 13-0411 B If Client fails to pay invoiced amounts within thirty(30) calendar days of the date of the invoice, ENCAP may at any time, without waiving any other claim against Client and without incurring any liability to Client, suspend or terminate performance under this Agreement as long as any hazardous conditions created by ENCAP'S previously performed services are rendered non-hazardous to Clients employee's, agents and subcontractors, the general public, and the environment. Termination shall not relieve Client of its obligation to pay amounts incurred up to termination, ENCAP shall be entitled to recover any and all costs of collection associated with recovery of amounts due under this Payment Agreement, including but not limited to reasonable attorney's fees. Client will indemnify and hold harmless ENCAP and its representatives, agents, employees, and successors and assigns from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, losses, penalties, fines, and damages of any nature whatsoever, and shall pay any reasonable attorney's fees, expert witnesses fees, and ENCAP fees, and court costs arising or resulting from (1) Client's breach of this Agreement; or (2) Client's negligence or intentional misconduct. Client shall accept full responsibility for payment notwithstanding any other agreement with owner or other party, and in no event will any provision in a contract, agreement, or understanding which conditions Client's payment to ENCAP upon receipt of the payment from any other party relieve Client from responsibility for payment to ENCAP. By: ENCAP, Inc. By: United City of Yorkville Jonathan Koepke Date Laura Schraw Date Yorkville-Kendall Marketplace Proposal 13-0411 B SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS rsa roxR eTassT r°ssvou w�a� ra: ssr-:4°° s�lm�4 .u.NSxm ,xvxr+.sr .mR1R9as RnNOIS PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRU f lu-w0I0i R.OFilr AAVARO 1.tlV.wp R.or ncesravoARO KEWALL COLNrY A-1 NEW 0709%1-OT F%QSTAR BAPK q.LAU S TRUST 949-8 AZ5�VALL COUNTY A-I I 2 IST CU.OIVAL ' TOBT CO. _ UIX No 700 x-40 AA Ia, OOAf 5S3 d9 48 4 46 45 44 4 42 41 ,j9 t T E' f _ r ICNNiGNEiHl C5TA7F.\s t 1T.t- CANNONBAL%�ESTATCS-UNIT ,� 3fl 5 34 r� _3 �� } i WC. N0.2�R 21 TCCFF8RUARY 27 52001 LASAIL OLN � ��y y(+jji�3 RAC NOVFN 1 RF KHl7ALL COWTY A{ y� '{q 31 t _. 3p rRlsr 47016 _. � 25 24 Qd';Rcry lle;Titltill Pgpttrsrr'irl'Sit�Sec,hlrtil� - �+r.� r I ., "��- _� J:siceE,'X'fI�JLLl1t27VC7IYS l lilt. —1 LOT 23 �I s 11GN17A7�:MA MI.t1C$RIISII r- 1,Ir11: j LL)?'5' `� r«:• r I� 4 �g •fr" LOT 22 LOT 52 LOT 57 DA �� 11 rrf LOT lb ,'� LOT 19 LOT 15x11 '•� .�i i Z ' 1 HOME DEPOT j�a, rfl/tfr/fllF�� fI r r r Kor LS �I— , �3a eoww LOT 17 fi RRTA L e4.E-LANE LANF 11 f G'RtHY QEtkGi7ltW W8 „ aea _ " enr I a SroRTING ryty,� l LOTl3r/ ° G000s I7r� _ LOT 18 jF 5T� a e L.9R di ¢ I �'L3Et3t EO 5 P ° ®�� x 1 } I a4 c3 � Tf/rrrty; I.OT13/ ., For Cannonball T',ralllmpraveruents Portion of l 4 LOT Site,See Plans Prepared By Smith Engineering 100.0'-Rtes DMCAT7tNr Consultants Titled"CANNONBALL TRAIL LOT 21 zcwE OAF,Id�fINl�4�H�l (Hf l'�Q � _�d LOT 11 �) +''1r k°I1i4tl+�fU�I[NilQ '� Y BALL COUNTY � A-1 � j i �F�1!!r�1 r I ttII ll �{,�� "[ k�rA.tl.. SUPER TARGET It VIII f +�.T�I IU IRE2 RER°HCP r -if0 Q!'I�iff1!lr4;r i� LOT 10 OAIt KN 1.5 suR0lvls;av x For fir-echo Ru:rrl lm rovementa Portion of 19$.00 R°A° Q r �1111l lllef Ii t' ua0 NO. 141937 !f LY„ 103 P 588°46'07'W QIiRFrr �I,�Nfidlr$illtiawiQ O ' Site,See Plans Prepared By Smith Engineering �� a Consultants Titled rBEECHER ROAD I Q,�QrQ rryl(+tr y l7At Q ilatldti41 ', -- - IMPROVEMENTS"' 1�RtIYrrfllN ��nr'�V Qt.lcwy� LOT KEBi DALLA COUNTY z IW o ' LASA/1 F NAT. BANG p LOT 2 r_4rue 7PLIST 47016 N LOT 3 LOT 4 `g f LOTS �r r � L43 i'S3 LOT 6 LOT 7 ,lf r s /- 1 - IUO'EVS Rpyy GRAPHIC SCALE INTERSECnON, TW. 1N FEET> I 1—h=200[L A0, w KENDALL MARKETPLACE 0'EXfS7wc ROIL" COMMERCIAL RECORD DRAWINGS Few S.R.341mprovements Portion ofsite,Soc YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS Plans Prepared By Smlth Engineering OVERALL SITE PLAN Consultants Tided"S.R.34 1 RIPI OVEMENT S I'. PHN - Mr. GATE- PROJECT NO. r. 4:G. C7r-99-Ge' JG'S of-25-00 HARL-07OH71 7_ DSN BY: INT. HOR12 SCALE: SHEET NO. A EX I'-200' CHK 6Y; INT.' VERT SCALE: 2 of 46 _..-- S P"fi NONE 0 CIP Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number J� $ 06 Legal El PW#2 Finance ❑ ESL -� 1836 Engineer ■ -_� City Administrator E] Tracking Number .4 City y Human Resources El� Wn sw _© Community Development ❑ PW 2013-38 � Police F-1 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: 2013 Roads to Better Roads Program Meeting and Date: City Council—September 10, 2013 Synopsis: Consideration of Contract Award Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Award of Contracts Submitted by: Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Notes: ti� 0 C I'. a Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator EST 1 `"?=1836 From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works .p .. p Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk LE Date: August 29, 2013 Subject: 2013 Roads to Better Roads Program Bids were received, opened and tabulated for work to be done on the Non-MFT funded portion of the 2013 Roads to Better Roads Program at 11:30 a.m., August 26, 2013. Representatives of contractors bidding the project, the City, and our firm were in attendance. A tabulation of the bids and the engineer's estimate is attached for your information and record. We recommend the acceptance of the bid and approval of award be made to the low bidder, D Construction, Co., 1488 S Broadway Street, Coal City, IL 60416 in the amount of $454,955.16, which is approximately 12.2% under the Engineer's Estimate of$518,021.50. If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know. Page 1 of 1 _--- BID TABULATION 2013 NON-MFT ROAD PROGRAM UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BID TABULATION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE HARDIN PAVING SERVICES D.CONSTRUCTION GENEVA CONSTRUCTION BIDS RECD 8/26/2013 4413 Roosevelt Road 1488 S Broadway P 0 Box 998 Suite 108 Coal City,IL 60416 IL RTE 25 and Indian Trail Hillside,IL 60162 Aurora.IL 60507 ITEM UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS(PRIME COAT) GAL 6415 S 050 $ 320750 $ 0-01 $ 64.15 S 0.01 S 64.15 $ 225 S 1443375 2 AGGREGATE(RPIME COAT) TON 26 20.00 52000 $ 0-05 130 $ 0.01 0.26 $ 1 00 2600 3 PREPARATION OF BASE SY 12,830 1 00 12.830.00 S 0.80 10.264.00 $ 0.58 7441 40 $ 0.90 11 547.00 4 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL-BUTT JOINT SO YD 206 8.00 1.648.00 S 2250 4.635-00 $ 7.00 1,442.00 $ 0.40 1.73040 6 BINDER(HAND METHOD),N50 TON 25 100.00 2,500 00 S 135.00 3,375,00 $ 79.90 1,997.50 $ 120.00 3.000.00 6 BINDER(MACHINE METHOD),N50,425" TON 3.144 7000 220,08000 S 6275 197.286.00 S 62.35 196.02840 $ 64.50 202788.00 7 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE,MIX"D",N50,1 75" TON 1298 7200. 93.528 00 $ 73.00 94.827.00 S 67.75 89.007.25 $ 7800 101,322.00 8 PCC DRIVEWAY REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SO YD 74 1 65.00 4.810.00 $ 8500 6.290.00 S 54.90 4.062.60 $ 60.00 4-440.00 9 HMA DRIVEWAY REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SO YD 134 45 00 6,030.00 $ 45.00 6.030.00 $ 3655 4,897 70 $ 3340 4.475.60 10 PCC SIDEWALK REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SO FT 2290 700 16,030.00 S 765 17,5185018 6.75 15.457.50 S 6.60 15.114.00 11 DETECTABLE WARNINGS SO FT 286 25.00 7.400.00 S 27.00 7.992001S 25-40 7.518.40 $ 19.85 5.875.60 12 1 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE ACE REMOVAL-6 INCH SO YD 12830 5-00 64,150..00 $ 3.45 44.263.50 S 335 42.980.50 S 340 43,622.00 13 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER R&R FOOT 1044 1 28.00 29,232 00 $ 32-50 33-930.00 $ 33.50 34.974 00 S 26.80 27 979 20 14 AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B TON 10 2000 20000 S 5000 500.00 $ 45.00 450.00 8 93.00 93000 15 MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED EACH 5 500.00 2.500.00 $ 500.00 2.500.00 S 350,00 1350.00 $ 415.00 2,075.00 16 SANITARY MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED EACH 6 750.00 4.50000 $ 750.00 4.500.00 1$ 810.00 4.860.00 S 665.00 3.99000 17 1 VAVLE BOX TO BE ADJUSTED EACH 1 150.00 150.00 $ 599.55 59955 S 35000 350.00 S 22500 22500 18 INLETS TO BE ADJUSTED EACH 3 500.00 1,500.00 $ 50000 1.500-00 $ 350.00 1,05000 $ 36000 1.06000 19 RESTORATION SO YD 1234 9.00 11,10600 9 7.75 9-563,50 $ 650 8021.00 S 915 11.29110 20 PCC SIDEWALK REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SO FT 125 200 250-00 $ 420 525.00 $ 1 30 162.50 S 0.90 11250 21 PCC SIDEWALK 5 INCH SPECIAL SO FT 2310 800 18-48L00 $ 8.00 18480.00 $ 9.50 21,945..00 S 650 1501500 2-2 1 INLET TYPE A,TYPE 3 FRAME AND GRATE EACH 1 2.50000 2.50000 S 2025.00 2.02500 S 1.10000 _ 1.100.00 S 2.400.00 _ 240000 23 STORM SEWER,ADS N-12,10" FOOT 100 75001 7.500.00 $ 8800 8,60000 S 30.00 3.000.00 S 105.00 10.500.00 24 BRICK PAVER REMOVAL SO FT 50 5.00 250,001 10.75 537.50 $ 5.50 275,00 S 1.2.80 640.00 25 CRACK SEALING FOOT 7120 100 7_120001$ 1.05 7,47600 S 100' 7.120.00 S 2.95 21004.00 TOTAL FOR ALL BID ITEMS 1-25 518.021.50 483,483.00 454,95516 505.616.15 %overiar4m r _.. •6 67" '1217% •2 39r':. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC 52 WHEELER ROAD.SUGAR GROVE,ILLINOIS CITE- 0 Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator 6sr. ` i 1836 From: Brad Sanderson, EEI f�� f�' CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works .� Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk LE Date: August 29, 2013 Subject: 2013 Roads to Better Roads Program Bids were received, opened and tabulated for work to be done on the MFT funded portion of the 2013 Roads to Better Roads Program at 11:30 a.m., August 26, 2013. Representatives of contractors bidding the project, the City, and our firm were in attendance. A tabulation of the bids and the engineer's estimate is attached for your information and record. We recommend the acceptance of the bid and approval of award be made to the low bidder, D Construction, Co., 1488 S Broadway Street, Coal City, IL 60416 in the amount of $232,028.67, which is approximately 7.5% under the Engineer's Estimate of$250,892.00. If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know. Page 1 01 1 BID TABULATION 2013 MFT ROAD PROGRAM UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE BID TABULATION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE HARDIN PAVING SERVICES D.CONSTRUCTION GENEVA CONSTRUCTION BIDS RECD 6/26/2013 4413 Roosevelt Road 1488 S Broadway P.O Box 998 Suite 108 Coal City,IL 60416 IL RTE 25 S Indian Trail Hi s de_IL 60162 Aurora,IL 60507 ITEM UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT NO DESCRIPTION UNIT OUANTITY PR QE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT BITUMINOUS MATERIALS(PRIME COAT) GAL 2492 S 050 S 1.246.00 S 0105 $ 124.60 S 0..01 3 2492 g 225 S 5.607.00 2 AGGREGATE(RPIME COAT) TON 25 _ 2000 50000 S 0A9. 2-25 5 0.01 025 S 1 00 25.00 Y HOT MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL-BUTT JOINT BY g40.S 8,00 1,926.00 S 1925 4.629.63 S 7.00 1,683.50 S 715 171958 LEVELING BINDER(HAND METHOD),N50 TON I 25 9000 225.00 $ 110,00 275000 $ 8045 2,01125 S 12500 3 125 00 5 LEVELING BINDER(MACHINE METHOD),1",N50 TON d95 73.00 3613600 S 6850 33.907.50 8 6425 31.803-75 5 7700 3e 115.00 LBINDER(MACHINE METHOD),225',N50 TON 426 7300 31.09800 S 65.25 27.796.50.5 6415 27.32790 6600 28.116.00 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE,MIX"D",N50,1 3/4" TON 1192 73 00 87.016.00 S 76.00 90592.00 S 6800 81.056.00 77.00 91-784.00 PCC DRIVEWAY REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT BY 66 6500 4.420.00 S 85.00 5780.00 S 5440 3,699.20 5 7000 4.760.00 INCIDENTAL HOT MIX ASPHALT SURFACING TON 97 9000 6.73000 S 130.00 12610,00 $ 8700 8.439.00 S 12500 12.12500 PCC SIDEWALK REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT SF 1010 7.00 7,070-00 $ 8.00 8.020.00 S 6 70 6,767-00 $ 7.00 747000 11 DETECTABLE WARNINGS SF 728 25.00 320" 9 27-00 3.456.00 S 26.00 2-200,00 S 20.00 2560.00 12 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE ACE REMOVAL-3 INCH BY 3294 400 13176-00 -S 245 8.070.30 $ 300 9.882.00 S 300 9,88200 CLASS D PATCHES,4INCH BY 13 227 4200 9534.00 S 40.00 2-08000 $ 2940 6.673.60 $ 31-00 7-03700 14 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT FT 140 30.00 4.200.00 $ 53-50 7.490-00 $ 33.60 4704.0 3200 4,480.00 15 AGGREGATE SHOULDERS,TYPE B TON 19 2000 O',-.^-W $-g-go 950.00 $ 4600 874.00 75.00 1,42E,00 16 REFLECTIVE CRACK CONTROL FT 3179 1.00 3.179.00 S 1.00 3,17900 S 1.10 1496.90 S 150 4.76850 17 MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED EACH 500.00 500.00 $ 500.00 50000 S 34500 345.00 S 450:00 450.00 16 SANITARY MANHOLES TO BE ADJUSTED EACH q 750.00 6.750.,00 S 725,00 6 525 00 5 $1000 7290,00 5 650-00 595000 16 WATER VAULT TO BE ADJUSTED EACH 2 250.00 500,0.0 $ 600.01 1-200,02 S 35000 700.00 5 45000 90000 20 RESTORATION BY 3110 8.00 24680.00 S 5.09 16550-00 $ 900 27990.00 .$ 9.00 27990.00 21 PCC SIDEWALK 5INCH SPECIAL SO FT 100 &00 800100 1 S 1525 1525.00 $ 600 600.00 $ 8.30 830.00 22 BRICK PAVER REMOVAL AND REPLACE SO YD 11 1000 110.00 S 165.00 1.81500 $ 7500 825.00 5 -OD 946.00. PREPERATION OF BASE SO YD 3294 100 3294.00 $ 0..80 2.63520 S 080 2..63520 5 125 4,11750 TOTAL FOR ALL BID ITEMS 1-23 250,892,00 248248.00 232,028.67 263,662.56 r,4verru^36r .1,46,0: •732!9 6 10% ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES,INC 52 WHEELER ROAD,SUGAR GROVE,ILLINOIS 11111E; . ■ I. . - woman ti ■IWIN ■� Ni ■E■NI■ , i • MM mmmmolm ;: ■ X11 ■11■■11 � . ��111111111111/1� �' bi1111I ��' i� ■ `�; ■ � 111111�l�1�111� �� �• ■11111 ��- �I�I���111� �� . �� 111111 �� X111■ ICI ■� `�' WIN � - -:1/ ■11111 �i !�„�' � ��� �I 111■ ���R ��� Ilii�� ����1 111111/� �`r ■� 11� _ - 1 � 11/l� �111� ■ �■■ ���1 +111111 VIII! ■���� :�I/■ �■ ■■ ■ 1111 �■ : ■� ■■ 11 � � ��. �■ � i■ ■ 711 r+�,! :� � .1111 ■ � �■ ■��-- ■� i 1111111` ■ 1■■1■� �/i ■; ■i � �!� t1■ ■ 111 NINE, 0 11�1�Big RV SM Now Engineering Enterprises, Inc. June 2013 52 Wheeler Road LOCATION MAP .. � � ■ X11` ■ '11'11 !�� :�11 � � �1 II■■■; t; i - -. � ■ �. .■ 1111111 � . .'�'•�: �,� ■111 �����''- � 111■1 � ♦v � . .111111 ■■• . -� � � Sugar •ve, Illinois .1 1 466-6700 I www.eeiweb.com Reviewed By: Agenda Item Number '' �► Legal ❑ EDC #1 Finance ❑ EST. -�` _ ti W36 Engineer ❑ �:--- g Tracking Number �! City Administrator ■ =t3 Human Resources ❑ EDC 2013-28 LE ��'` Community Development F-1 Police ❑ Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Fourth amendment to the Imperial Investments TIF agreement Meeting and Date: City Council—September 10, 2013 Synopsis: Review of a fourth amendment to the Imperial Investments TIF agreement, related to the undergrounding of electric infrastructure Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 8/27/2013 Action Taken: Tabled to 9/10 CC meeting Item Number: EDC 2013-28 Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Bart Olson Administration Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum To: City Council EST. 183fi From: Bart Olson, City Administrator ' CC: Date: September 5, 2013 Subject: Imperial Investments TIF agreement fourth amendment LJILL E�% Summary Consideration of a fourth amendment to the Imperial Investments TIF agreement for the funding of the utility underground construction project. Background This item was last discussed at the August 27th City Council meeting,where it was tabled to the September 10th City Council meeting. At the time of the August 27th City Council meeting, staff had not yet spoken with the developer about the City Council request for both the upfront and back-end payments to be non-guaranteed. Since then, we have had a chance to speak with the developer, and they have indicated the City Council request would be acceptable. I have included the draft agreement with the changes requested by City Council. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the fourth amended TIF agreement with Imperial Investments. FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Imperial Investments, LLC) THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT (the "Fourth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Project Area dated April 23, 2012, as amended January 8, 2013, April 9, 2013 and July 18, 2013, by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, a municipal corporation (hereafter the "City") and Imperial Investments, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (hereafter the "Developer"), is dated this day of 2013. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2006-46 adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City (the "Corporate Authorities"), the Downtown Yorkville Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project and Plan (hereinafter the "Redevelopment Plan") was approved, which project and plan covered some of the oldest properties of the City constituting a significant portion of the City's historic Downtown; and, WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2006-47 and No. 2006-48 adopted by the Corporate Authorities on June 13, 2006, the City designated approximately 200 acres containing 114 buildings as a "redevelopment project area" (the "Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area") and adopted tax increment financing pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq.) (hereinafter referred to as the"Act"); and, WHEREAS, as authorized by the TIF Act, on April 23, 2013, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2012-06, the Corporate Authorities entered into the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Project Area (the "Original Agreement") with the Developer in order to 1 induce the development and redevelopment of certain properties within the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Original Agreement, the City agreed to reimburse the Developer for Redevelopment Project Costs as specifically identified therein for the following four(4) Projects: 1. Cobblestone Bakery, Project No. 1; 2. Follies Theater, Project No. 2; 3. Follies Box Office, Project No. 3; and, 4. Van Emmon Apartments, Project No. 4; and, WHEREAS, on January 8, 2013, the Original Agreement was amended to add the following additional redevelopment projects (the "Additional Projects") and provide additional incentives as set forth in the First Amendment to the Original Agreement: 1. 209 South Bridge Street; 2. The parking lot immediately to the north of 209 Bridge Street; 3. 213 South Bridge Street; and, 4. An expansion of the Cobblestone Bakery Project No. 1; and, WHEREAS, on April 9, 2013, the Original Agreement was again amended to include new redevelopment projects at 102 E. Van Emmon Street (the "Bank Property") and a parking lot located at the northeast corner of West Van Emmon Street and the west alley (the "Parking Lot'); and on July 18, 2013, was again amended to further enhance the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area by undertaking the demolition of a portion of a utility station 2 owned by the City and replacing the fagade on the portion remaining and creating a pedestrian walkway; and, WHEREAS, once again the Developer has submitted a proposal to the City to undertake additional improvements Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area to remove the unsightly cable, electrical and telephone lines now located between the west alley at the corner of West Van Emmon Street and 101 West Van Emmon, as depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and locating these lines underground(the "Utility Line Relocation Project"); and, WHEREAS, in order to induce the Developer to continue with The Projects approved in the Original Agreement, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase, the Fourth Redevelopment Phase, and the Utility Line Restoration Project (collectively, "The Projects"), the City designated a portion of the commercial area of the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area as a "Business District" in accordance with the Business District Development and Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.3 et seq.) (the "Business District Act"), on January 8, 2013; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Business District Act, once a business district is designated, the Corporate Authorities may impose a retailers' occupation tax, service occupation tax, and a hotel operators' occupation tax in an amount not to exceed one percent (1%) to pay costs to be incurred in connection with the planning, execution and implementation of the goals and objectives as set forth in the business district plan, and the Corporate Authorities have, in fact, imposed a retailers' occupation tax and a service occupation tax of one percent (1%) in the business district; and, 3 WHEREAS, the City desires the Developer to proceed with The Projects as stated in the Original Agreement, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase and the Fourth Redevelopment Phase and the Utility Line Relocation Project and is, therefore, willing to commit additional incentives available pursuant to the Act and the Business District Act in order to induce the Developer to proceed, all as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth,the parties agree as follows: Section 1. Incorporation. The representations and recitations set forth in the preambles hereto are material to this Fourth Amendment and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Fourth Amendment as though fully set forth in this Section I and said representations and recitations constitute the understandings of the City and the Developer. Section 2. The Imperial Investment Utility Line Relocation Project Feasibility Study. A. The Developer has undertaken a study to determine if it is financially feasible as well as practical, to relocate the unsightly electrical, cable and telephone lines located between the west alley at the northeast corner of W. Van Emmon Street and 101 W. Van Emmon, as depicted on Exhibit A hereto to an underground location (the "Feasibility Study"). The Developer has submitted said Feasibility Study to the City and is consulting with the City on the economic viability of proceeding with the Utility Line Relocation Project. B. The Developer has advanced all necessary funds required to complete the Feasibility Study, the cost of which is a Redevelopment Project Cost which shall be reimbursable as provided in Section 4 below. 4 Section 3. Developer's Obligations as a Condition Precedent to the City's Commitment. A. In the event the Utility Line Relocation Project is determined to be feasible by both the City and the Developer after joint review, discussion and consultation, the Developer agrees to undertake the Utility Line Relocation Project on or before December 31, 2015, in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all permits and approvals. B. The Developer shall not be eligible for reimbursement for any of the costs incurred in connection with the Utility Line Relocation Project unless and until said project is completed in accordance with all permits and approvals. Section 4. Obligations and Commitments of the City. A. So long as no notice pursuant to Section 20 of the Original Agreement has been issued and remains outstanding, the City shall reimburse the Developer for "Redevelopment Project Costs" as follows: 1. Upon completion of the Utility Line Relocation Project by the Developer and approval thereof by the City Engineer, the Developer shall submit to the City a Request for Reimbursement, as provided in the Original Agreement. The City shall reimburse the Developer in an amount equal to the lesser of(i) fifty percent (50%) of the cost of the Utility Line Relocation Project; or, (ii) $130,000. Said amount shall be immediately due and payable to the Developer upon acceptance by the City of said Utility Line Relocation Project from that portion of the STAF (as defined within the Original Agreement) not otherwise obligated to the Developer. If sufficient funds are not available in the STAF, reimbursement shall be made to the Developer from future deposits into the STAF. 5 2. It is the intent of the City to ultimately reimburse the Developer for eighty percent (80%) of the total cost of the Utility Line Relocation Project. The City agrees to reimburse the Developer the difference between the total cost of the Utility Line Relocation and the amount paid to the Developer pursuant to 2 above (the "Additional Reimbursement"), said Additional Reimbursement to be payable in ten (10) equal annual installments from that portion of the STAF (as defined in the Original Agreement) not otherwise obligated to the Developer_ If sufficient funds are not available in the STAF, reimbursement shall be made to the Developer from future deposits into the STAF. inefemental Twies generated from all pr-epeAies owned by the Developef. Section S. Undertakings on the Part of Developer. The Developer hereby covenants and agrees to promptly pay, as the same become due, any and all taxes and governmental charges of any kind that may at any time be assessed with regard to any of its business operations in the City including all real estate taxes assessed against the Imperial Investment Projects, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase, the Fourth Redevelopment Phase or any other location owned or controlled by the Developer. Section 6. Term. Section 7 of the Original Agreement is understood to have been amended to state that unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section 20 of the Original Agreement, the term of this Redevelopment Agreement shall commence on the date of execution and end December 31, 2029, regarding the City's obligation to deposit Incremental Taxes into the Imperial Sub-Account and December 31, 2036, with regard to the City's obligation to deposit BD Taxes, into the Imperial Investment Sub-Account. 6 Section 7. All other provisions of the Original Agreement; as amended January 8, 2013, April 9, 2013 and July 18, 2013, by this Fourth Amendment one hereby affirmed as in full force and effect. Section 8. Counterparts. This Fourth Amendment Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk IMPERIAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Illinois liability company By: President Attest: Secretary 8 ExhibitA 9 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NO.2013- AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Imperial Investments, LLC) Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois This 10th day of September,2013 Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County, Illinois on '2013. Ordinance No. 2013- AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Imperial Investments, LLC) WHEREAS, pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act of the State of Illinois, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et seq., as from time to time amended (the "TIF Act"), the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville (collectively, the "Corporate Authorities") entered into an Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Project Area (the "Original Agreement") with Imperial Investments, LLC (the "Developer") in order to induce the development and redevelopment of certain properties within the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area; and, WHEREAS, on January 8, 2013, the Original Agreement was amended by a First Amendment to add additional projects and provide additional incentives; and, WHEREAS, on April 9, 2013 the Amended Agreement was further amended by a Second Amendment to include the Developer's proposal to redevelop, rehabilitate and renovate the Bank Property and the Parking Lot and the City agreed to commit additional incentives; and, WHEREAS, on July 18, 2013, the Amended Agreement was again amended to further enhance the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area by undertaking the partial demolition of a utility station owned by the City and replacing the fagade on the portion remaining and constructing a pedestrian walkway; and, WHEREAS, in order to assist with the Additional Projects, the Corporate Authorities by Ordinance No. 2013-01 designated a portion of the commercial area of the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area as a"Business District" in accordance Ordinance No.2013- Page 2 with the Business District Development and Redevelopment Law (65 ILCS 5/11-74.3 et seq.) (the "Business District Act") and imposed a one percent (1%) retailers' occupation tax and a service occupation tax as permitted by the Business District Act (the "BD Taxes") in order to pay redevelopment project costs; and, WHEREAS, once again the Developer has submitted a proposal to the City to undertake additional improvements Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area to remove the unsightly cable, electrical and telephone lines now located between the west alley at the corner of West Van Emmon Street and 101 West Van Emmon, as depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and locating these lines underground (the "Utility Line Relocation Project"); and, WHEREAS, once again the Developer has submitted a proposal to the City to undertake additional improvements Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area the unsightly cable, electrical and telephone lines now located between the west alley at the corner of West Van Emmon Street and 101 West Van Emmon, and to relocate these lines underground; and, WHEREAS, the City desires the Developer to continue to undertake improvements to the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area including the relocation of unsightly cable, electric and telephone lines, in accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth in the Fourth Amendment to the Original Agreement in the form attached hereto and made a part hereof. Ordinance No.2013- Page 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance as though fully set forth in this section. Section 2. That the FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Imperial Investments, LLQ, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the United City of Yorkville. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of 92013. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO JOEL FRIEDERS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2013. MAYOR Ordinance No.2013- Page 4 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Imperial Investments, LLC) THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT (the "Fourth Amendment") to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Project Area dated April 23, 2012, as amended January 8, 2013, April 9, 2013 and July 18, 2013, by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, a municipal corporation (hereafter the "City") and Imperial Investments, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (hereafter the "Developer"), is dated this day of 2013. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2006-46 adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City (the "Corporate Authorities"), the Downtown Yorkville Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project and Plan (hereinafter the "Redevelopment Plan") was approved, which project and plan covered some of the oldest properties of the City constituting a significant portion of the City's historic Downtown; and, WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2006-47 and No. 2006-48 adopted by the Corporate Authorities on June 13, 2006, the City designated approximately 200 acres containing 114 buildings as a "redevelopment project area" (the "Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area") and adopted tax increment financing pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq.) (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"); and, WHEREAS, as authorized by the TIF Act, on April 23, 2013,pursuant to Ordinance No. 2012-06, the Corporate Authorities entered into the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Project Area (the "Original Agreement") with the Developer in order to 1 induce the development and redevelopment of certain properties within the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Original Agreement, the City agreed to reimburse the Developer for Redevelopment Project Costs as specifically identified therein for the following four(4) Projects: 1. Cobblestone Bakery, Project No. l; 2. Follies Theater, Project No. 2; 3. Follies Box Office, Project No. 3; and, 4. Van Emmon Apartments, Project No. 4; and, WHEREAS, on January 8, 2013, the Original Agreement was amended to add the following additional redevelopment projects (the "Additional Projects") and provide additional incentives as set forth in the First Amendment to the Original Agreement: 1. 209 South Bridge Street; 2. The parking lot immediately to the north of 209 Bridge Street; 3. 213 South Bridge Street; and, 4. An expansion of the Cobblestone Bakery Project No. 1; and, WHEREAS, on April 9, 2013, the Original Agreement was again amended to include new redevelopment projects at 102 E. Van Emmon Street (the "Bank Property") and a parking lot located at the northeast corner of West Van Emmon Street and the west alley (the "Parking Lot"); and on July 18, 2013, was again amended to further enhance the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area by undertaking the demolition of a portion of a utility station 2 owned by the City and replacing the fagade on the portion remaining and creating a pedestrian walkway; and, WHEREAS, once again the Developer has submitted a proposal to the City to undertake additional improvements Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area to remove the unsightly cable, electrical and telephone lines now located between the west alley at the corner of West Van Emmon Street and 101 West Van Emmon, as depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and locating these lines underground(the "Utility Line Relocation Project"); and, WHEREAS, in order to induce the Developer to continue with The Projects approved in the Original Agreement, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase, the Fourth Redevelopment Phase, and the Utility Line Restoration Project (collectively, "The Projects"), the City designated a portion of the commercial area of the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area as a "Business District" in accordance with the Business District Development and Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.3 et seq.) (the "Business District Act"), on January 8, 2013; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Business District Act, once a business district is designated, the Corporate Authorities may impose a retailers' occupation tax, service occupation tax, and a hotel operators' occupation tax in an amount not to exceed one percent (1%) to pay costs to be incurred in connection with the planning, execution and implementation of the goals and objectives as set forth in the business district plan, and the Corporate Authorities have, in fact, imposed a retailers' occupation tax and a service occupation tax of one percent (1%) in the business district; and, 3 WHEREAS, the City desires the Developer to proceed with The Projects as stated in the Original Agreement, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase and the Fourth Redevelopment Phase and the Utility Line Relocation Project and is, therefore, willing to commit additional incentives available pursuant to the Act and the Business District Act in order to induce the Developer to proceed, all as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. Incorporation. The representations and recitations set forth in the preambles hereto are material to this Fourth Amendment and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Fourth Amendment as though fully set forth in this Section I and said representations and recitations constitute the understandings of the City and the Developer. Section 2. The Imperial Investment Utility Line Relocation Project Feasibility Study. A. The Developer has undertaken a study to determine if it is financially feasible as well as practical, to relocate the unsightly electrical, cable and telephone lines located between the west alley at the northeast corner of W. Van Emmon Street and 101 W. Van Emmon, as depicted on Exhibit A hereto to an underground location (the "Feasibility Study"). The Developer has submitted said Feasibility Study to the City and is consulting with the City on the economic viability of proceeding with the Utility Line Relocation Project. B. The Developer has advanced all necessary funds required to complete the Feasibility Study, the cost of which is a Redevelopment Project Cost which shall be reimbursable as provided in Section 4 below. 4 Section 3. Developer's Obligations as a Condition Precedent to the City's Commitment. A. In the event the Utility Line Relocation Project is determined to be feasible by both the City and the Developer after joint review, discussion and consultation, the Developer agrees to undertake the Utility Line Relocation Project on or before December 31, 2015, in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all permits and approvals. B. The Developer shall not be eligible for reimbursement for any of the costs incurred in connection with the Utility Line Relocation Project unless and until said project is completed in accordance with all permits and approvals. Section 4. Obligations and Commitments of the City. A. So long as no notice pursuant to Section 20 of the Original Agreement has been issued and remains outstanding, the City shall reimburse the Developer for "Redevelopment Project Costs" as follows: 1. Upon completion of the Utility Line Relocation Project by the Developer and approval thereof by the City Engineer, the Developer shall submit to the City a Request for Reimbursement, as provided in the Original Agreement. The City shall reimburse the Developer in an amount equal to the lesser of(i) fifty percent(50%) of the cost of the Utility Line Relocation Project; or, (ii) $130,000. Said amount shall be immediately due and payable to the Developer upon acceptance by the City of said Utility Line Relocation Project from that portion of the STAF (as defined within the Original Agreement) not otherwise obligated to the Developer. If sufficient funds are not available in the STAF, reimbursement shall be made to the Developer from future deposits into the STAF. 5 2. It is the intent of the City to ultimately reimburse the Developer for eighty percent (80%) of the total cost of the Utility Line Relocation Project. The City agrees to reimburse the Developer the difference between the total cost of the Utility Line Relocation and the amount paid to the Developer pursuant to 2 above (the "Additional Reimbursement"), said Additional Reimbursement to be payable in ten (10) equal annual installments from that portion of the STAY (as defined in the Original Agreement) not otherwise obligated to the Developer. If sufficient funds are not available in the STAF, reimbursement shall be made to the Developer from future deposits into the STAF. Section S. Undertakings on the Part of Developer. The Developer hereby covenants and agrees to promptly pay, as the same become due, any and all taxes and governmental charges of any kind that may at any time be assessed with regard to any of its business operations in the City including all real estate taxes assessed against the Imperial Investment Projects, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase, the Fourth Redevelopment Phase or any other location owned or controlled by the Developer. Section 6. Term. Section 7 of the Original Agreement is understood to have been amended to state that unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section 20 of the Original Agreement, the term of this Redevelopment Agreement shall commence on the date of execution and end December 31, 2029, regarding the City's obligation to deposit Incremental Taxes into the Imperial Sub-Account and December 31, 2036, with regard to the City's obligation to deposit BD Taxes, into the Imperial Investment Sub-Account. 6 Section 7. All other provisions of the Original Agreement; as amended January 8, 2013, April 9, 2013 and July 18, 2013, by this Fourth Amendment one hereby affirmed as in full force and effect. Section 8. Counterparts. This Fourth Amendment Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk IMPERIAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Illinois liability company By: President Attest: Secretary 8 Exhibit A 9 PROPOSED COMED DIAGRAM TO REMOVE UTILITY POLES AND REINSTALL COMED,ATT and COMCAST LINES BELOW GROUND � y 3 r 4 'Y 11 _ _ b_ KEY • 1 thru 6 represents existing Utility Poles and lines to be removed. 0 Dark Blue Dashed Line Represents new subsurface utility lines to be run from North side of West Alley and Hydraulic to South sided of West Alley and Van Emmon. Memorandum To: City Council EST. 183fi From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: July 30, 2013 Subject: Imperial Investments TIF agreement fourth amendment LJILL E�% Summary Consideration of a fourth amendment to the Imperial Investments TIF agreement for the funding of the utility underground construction project. Background This item was last discussed at the June Economic Development Committee meeting. At that meeting, the committee reviewed a third amended TIF agreement that contemplated utility undergrounding,pump-house fagade improvements, and a partial tear-down of the pump-house. The committee members had some concern with the large upfront payment for the undergrounding project, and requested the construction of and payment for the underground utilities be isolated in its own agreement with further language indicating that the upfront payment would only be made by the City if TIF funds are available. This fourth agreement isolates the underground utility construction project, and contains language in Section 4A1 that states if no funds are available in the downtown TIF fund, that the payment will be made at a later date when TIF funds are available. Of note, the discussion at the June EDC meeting was that the upfront payment should not be guaranteed; the annual payments thereafter are currently drafted as guaranteed, due to their minor nature. The City and Imperial Investments expect that the final cost to underground all of the aboveground utilities in the area will cost between $200,000 and $260,000. However, this number is our own estimate. ComEd owns the poles that the electric, telephone, and cable wires are installed upon, and they can not give us a better cost estimate until our concept plan design is finished by ComEd. Imperial Investments authorized this concept plan and they are waiting to hear back from ComEd on a study schedule. The funding for the concept plan is addressed in the third amended TIF agreement with Imperial Investments. Around 80% of the cost to underground the aboveground utilities is for"public" infrastructure or private infrastructure not applicable to Imperial Investments properties. The public infrastructure would be the poles, feeder electric lines, and other electric, cable and telephone equipment used to bring the services into the immediate area. The private infrastructure would be the individual service lines into each property. Thus, only 20% of the total aboveground infrastructure cost is applicable to undergrounding the private electric lines for Imperial Investments' properties. Accordingly, we have proposed the following: 1) Once the due diligence study is completed, the City and Imperial Investments will review the study results, and decide whether to proceed forward with the undergrounding. Either party can decline to proceed with the undergrounding. 2) If both parties agree to proceed forward with the undergrounding of the construction, Imperial Investments will coordinate and complete the project with whatever payment system ComEd requires. Imperial Investments will send the City an invoice for 50% of the undergrounding cost, up to a maximum of$130,000. If TIF funds are not available to make this payment, the City will defer payment until TIF funds are available. a. If the total project is $200,000, the City cuts a check to Imperial Investments for $100,000. b. If the total project is $500,000, the City cuts a check to Imperial Investments for $130,000. 3) After the undergrounding is complete, the City will pay the increment from whatever amount is paid to Imperial Investments in#3 up to 80% of the total undergrounding project cost over a 10 year period. The City will make these payments whether TIF funds are available or not. a. In Scenario 3a above, Imperial Investments will send the City an invoice for the increment of$60,000, and the City pays that$60,000 off over 10 years at $6,000 per year. 80%x $200,000 = $160,000 $160,000 - $100,000= $60,000 b. In Scenario 3B above, Imperial Investments will send the City an invoice for the increment of$270,000 and the City pays that $270,000 off over 10 years at $27,000 per year. 80%x $500,000= $400,000 $400,000 - $130,000= $270,000 4) The remaining 20% of the entire undergrounding project paid for by Imperial Investments is considered a TIF eligible and Business District Eligible Cost, available for reimbursement pursuant to those agreements. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the fourth amended TIF agreement with Imperial Investments. CIP Reviewed By: K 0 Legal ❑ Agenda Item Number 06 Finance ❑ PC#1 ESL -� 1836 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 � �� �; � y Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number � �© Community Development Police PC 2013-09 & PC 2013-10 Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: 1100 McHugh Road (Occhipinti)—Applications for Annexation and Rezoning Meeting and Date: City Council/September 10, 2013 Synopsis: Request for annexation and rezoning to within the R-4 General Residence District. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 8-27-13 Action Taken: Public Hearing Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: The applicant, Peter Occhipinti, has formally withdrawn his petition for annexation and rezoning of the property located at 1100 McHugh Road, per the attached withdrawal letter. t --20 SEP or, 2013 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT `� I] CfTy Reviewed By: X06 Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ PC #2a EST. -� __ti 1836 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development PC 2013-12 Police ALE � Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Prestwick of Yorkville (Yorkville Christian School)—Amended Annexation Agreement Meeting and Date: City Council/September 10, 2013 Synopsis: Request for amendment to an existing Annexation Agreement for a proposed new Christian high school. Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 8-27-13 Action Taken: Public Hearing Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum 0 To: City Council 1es6 Esr. From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director 1 `= CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: September 5, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville—Yorkville Christian School Kendae counTy �� Request for Annexation Agreement Amendment& Final Plat <kE '►�' As the City Council will recall, a public hearing was the request for Amended Annexation Agreement for the Prestwick of Yorkville development was conducted during the August 27, 2013 meeting. Since then the applicant has submitted revised plans and amended portions of the proposed amended annexation agreement to address the comments and concerns expressed during the public hearing. Annexation Agreement Request Attached is a copy of the Petitioners' most recent draft annexation agreement for the proposed new Ashley Pointe subdivision, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Below, are comments regarding the various sections of the proposed amended agreement which should be considered carefully by the City Council: 1. Final Plat: The Plan Commission held a public hearing on August 14, 2013 regarding the proposed new final plat for the private Christian high school with a formal recommendation of approval (see attached). A subsequent submittal has been provided by the Petitioner dated August 6, 2013 and staff recommends approval subject to comments provided by EEI in a recent review letter dated September 5, 2013. 2. Park Site: The Petitioners have agreed to remove their initial request that the land/cash contribution for parks be satisfied by the developer grading and seeding of a park site previously dedicated (indicated as "City Park" on attached plans) and move forward with staff's recommendation to construct a paved area at a size and in a location of the City's choosing to accommodate vehicular parking and receive credit for such an improvement against the land cash contribution. 3. Fees and Charges: The Petitioners have proposed to use the attached fee sheet(Exhibit E) for the new Ashley Pointe Subdivision. The water connection fee has been revised from $2,660 to $3,700 to reflect the current rate for a single family home. Land Use/Zoning Considerations The Petitioner has revised their request for accessory uses to include only the following which are permitted per the current R-2 One-Family Residence District zoning: • Single-family detached dwellings • Accessory Uses • Off-Street Parking Facilities • Schools - public, private or denominational, elementary and high schools including playgrounds, garages for school buses and athletic fields, auxiliary thereto. The Petitioner has also opted to remove the request for the previously proposed following accessory structures: o Cell telephone tower; not to exceed 120' in height o Wind Turbine/wind mill; not to exceed 120' in height o Athletic field lighting poles not to exceed 90' in height o Mock silos for internal stairways adjacent to the building; not to exceed 80' in height. o Height of the school building to be up to fifty (50) feet and the silos up to eight (80) feet. o Free standing permanent school ground mounted identification sign up to fifteen feet (15') in height; double faced and fifty (50) square feet of signage per side, including an electronic message display panel. The Petitioner has the right to seek variances or special uses, as required by ordinance, to be allowed to install such accessory structures at a later time. Land Cash/Park Board Comments: Again, the Petitioners are requesting a reduction in the valuation of an improved acre of land to $25,000/acre for the purposes of calculating land-cash fees for parks and schools based upon a recent appraisal of land value in the Yorkville area. Per the current Land Cash Ordinance, an acre of improved land is valued at $101,000.00. However, at the time of the original annexation agreement for the property, the land cash value was locked in at $80,000.00/acre for a period of five (5) years and has since expired. Staff is now recommending land cash valuation of $58,000 per acre of improved land for land cash value for this development (refer to the attached memo from the City Administrator). Although the Land Cash Ordinance (Ord. 1996-3 as amended) permits the developer to petition for a reduced land-cash fee by submitting an appraisal showing the fair-market value of such improved land in the area of the development, with the final determination of the "fair market value" per acre of improved land made by the City Council; staff has presented this proposed reduction request before the Park Board which recommended against the $25,000/acre offer and suggested $80,000/acre or to not take a cash donation at this time and to request additional land or cash value at the time of Unit 2 platting. Engineering Comments: The City Engineer has reviewed the Final Engineering Plans, Storm Sewer Design Reports and Traffic Impact Study submitted by HR Green and prepared review comments related to such documents in a letter dated September 5, 2013 (attached). In general, there are no significant issues related to the storm sewer design or traffic study findings. The comments provided can be, and are typically, addressed at a staff level for review and approval before such permits as mass grading, stormwater management and building are issued for construction. Staff Comments: Overall, staff is supportive of the proposed educational land use for this area of the former Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision and is confident that the engineering comments, which are subject to approval of the proposed amended annexation agreement and final plat of approval, can be addressed to the satisfaction of our ordinances during the staff level review. Attachments: 1. Proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development prepared by John F. Philipchuck, attorney for the Petitioners, and further revised by City Staff on September 5,2013. 2. EEI Letter to the City dated September 5,2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 2. 3. Storm Sewer Design Report prepared by HR Green,dated August 22,2013. 4. Traffic Impact Study prepared by KLOA, Inc. dated August 22, 2013. Ordinance No. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT OF YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT—PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION (Yorkville Christian School) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City and John and Michelle Stewart (the "Owner"), as successors to the original owners, desire to amend the Annexation Agreement, to provide for the resubdivision of Lot 358 for a private high school, amend the required donations and contributions and seek exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the Mayor and City Council (the "Corporate Authorities") on the amended annexation agreement on August 27, 2013, and all notices required by law have been given by the City and Owner; and, WHEREAS,the statutory procedures provided in Section 11-15.1-1 of the Illinois Municipal Code for the execution of the amended annexation agreement have been fully complied with; and, WHEREAS,the Corporate Authorities have concluded that the approval and execution of the proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement is in the best interests of the health, safety, and welfare of the City. WHEREAS, the City and Owner desire to proceed in accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth in the First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2: The First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development and the City of Yorkville (Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision) attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A is hereby approved; and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver same. Section 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Ordinance No.2013- Page 1 Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of , 2013. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO JOEL FRIEDERS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2013. MAYOR Ordinance No.2013- Page 2 Clean version STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SS COUNTY OF KENDALL ) FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT OF YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT AND THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION) This First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement (the "AMENDMENT"), is made and entered into this day of , 2013, by and between the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, a municipal corporation (the "CITY"), and the owner of record John Stewart and Michelle Stewart, ("OWNER" or "DEVELOPER" or"OWNER/DEVELOPER"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, OWNER owns fee simple title to the real property which is legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, consisting of approximately 190 acres, more or less (hereinafter"PROPERTY"); WHEREAS, on April 26, 2005, the CITY annexed and zoned the PROPERTY in an R-2 Single Family Residence District in accordance with the terms of the "Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development and The United City of Yorkville" ("AGREEMENT"); WHEREAS, the original owner and developer under the Agreement was unable to complete the development of the PROPERTY; WHEREAS, the Final Plat for Unit 1 of the Property was recorded and the improvements required under Unit 1 were substantially completed; WHEREAS, the Final Plat for Unit 2 was not recorded; WHEREAS, the OWNER/DEVELOPER subsequently acquired the PROPERTY, described in Exhibit"A"to the AMENDMENT; WHEREAS, the OWNER/DEVELOPER desires to amend the AGREEMENT to provide for a re-subdivision of Lot 358 for a private high school; amend the donations and contributions; and seek other exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance; WHEREAS, R-2 Zoning under the CITY's ordinances allows for a school as a permitted use; 157227/1 1 WHEREAS, all notices required by law relating to this AMENDMENT have been given to the persons or entities entitled thereto, pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the CITY have duly fixed the time for a public hearing on this AMENDMENT and pursuant to legal notice have held such hearing thereon all as required by the provisions of the Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have duly held all public hearings relating to AMENDMENT all as required by the provisions of the CITY's Ordinances and Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, in accordance with the powers granted to the CITY by the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-1 through 15.1-5 (2002), inclusive, relating to annexation agreements, the parties hereto wish to enter into this binding AMENDMENT of the AGREEMENT and to provide for various other matters related directly or indirectly to amending the annexation of the PROPERTY, as authorized by, the provisions of said statutes; WHEREAS, pursuant to due notice and publication in the manner provided by law, the Plan Commission of the CITY have had such public hearing and have taken all further action required by the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15-1.3 (2002) and the ordinances of the CITY relating to the procedure for authorization, approval and execution of the subdivision of Lot 358 by the CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements and conditions herein contained, and by authority of and in accordance with the aforesaid statutes of the State of Illinois, the parties agree as follows: 1. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT. OWNER has filed with the Clerk of the CITY a duly and properly executed Application to Amend Annexation Agreement pursuant to, and in accordance with the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/7-1-1 et seq. (2002). CITY agrees to adopt any necessary ordinances to amend the AGREEMENT as soon as reasonably practical. To the extent there is a conflict between the terms of the AMENDMENT and the AGREEMENT, the terms of the AMENDMENT shall control. 2. ZONING. That said paragraph be amended as follow: A. PROPERTY shall be developed in substantial compliance with the ordinances of the CITY in effect at the time of passage of this AMENDMENT to AGREEMENT except as modified by said AMENDMENT. B. The CITY shall approve the revised final plat of subdivision of Lot 358 in Prestwick of Yorkville, Unit 1, prepared by HR Green dated July 2, 2013, last revised 157227/1 2 August 6, 2013, attached hereto as Exhibit B, with such amendments as are required pursuant to the City Engineer's letter dated September 5, 2013, items 60 thru 63 inclusive. 3. Paragraph 5 DONATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONS. be amended as follows: A. DEVELOPER shall receive a credit against all City and County road impact fees for the improvements by the DEVELOPER to Il Route 126 at Penman Road, Ashley Road and Route 126 intersection and Ashley Road improvements adjacent to the PROPERTY. B. DEVELOPER shall pay revised school and park land-cash fees or provide land dedication as required under the terms of this AMENDMENT and Exhibit E attached hereto. 4. Paragraph 6 SECURITY INVESTMENTS. Amend by providing an additional paragraph to read as follows: OWNER/DEVELOPER has provided CITY with a Subdivision Bond for the Prestwick Subdivision in the amount of One-Million Eight-Hundred Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Eighty-Four and 00/100's Dollars ($1,879,684.00). CITY agrees to reduce said bond so as not to bond for street parkway/trees and public side-walk improvements. CITY agrees to instead obtain any surety needed for such improvements from the builder of the home on each lot. Developer will provide any required security for the high school improvements, including roadways. 5. Paragraph 9 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCES. Amend to read as follows: CITY agrees to amend the five (5) years where referenced throughout said paragraph to ten (10) years, said ten (10) years commencing from the approval date of this AMENDMENT. 6. Paragraph I I FEES AND CHARGES. Shall be revised as follows: Notwithstanding the provisions of the AGREEMENT the fees due and owing to the CITY for those fees and amounts shall be set forth in the revised Exhibit E attached hereto and made a part of this AMENDMENT. The Owner acknowledges that the donations contained in this Agreement, and the City Code, are made voluntarily by the OWNER, and the OWNER hereby waives for itself and its successors and assigns the right to contest at any time in the future, the validity or the amount of the donations. 157227/1 3 7. Paragraph 18 NOTICES AND REMEDIES. Shall be amended as follows: City Attorney: Kathleen Field-Orr&Associates 53 W. Jackson Boulevard, Suite 964 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Developer: John Stewart and Michelle Stewart 3874 N. IL Route 71 Sheridan, IL 60118 Developer Attorney: John F. Philipchuck Dommermuth, Cobine, West, Gensler, Philipchuck, Corrigan and Bernhard, Ltd. 111 E. Jefferson Ave., Suite 200 Naperville, IL 60540 Telephone: 630-355-5800 Facsimile: 630-355-5976 8. Paragraph 22 GENERAL PROVISIONS. H. Term of Agreement Shall be amended as follows: The term of this AGREEMENT shall be twenty (20) years. In the event that a permit for construction is issued within said twenty-year period all of the terms of this AGREEMENT for that permit shall remain enforceable despite said time limitation, unless modified by written agreement of the CITY and OWNER/DEVELOPER. 9. Add an additional paragraph 24. SCHOOL PROPERTY. OWNER/DEVELOPER intends to develop the re-subdivided Lot 358 to accommodate an approximately 32 acre site for a private high school. CITY agrees that the existing R-2 One-Family Residence allows as a permitted use schools; including denominational or private, elementary and high, including playgrounds, garages for school buses and athletic fields. In addition, the CITY agrees to permit the following accessory and auxiliary uses all as permitted uses: • Retail store, not to exceed 3,000 sq. ft.; Selling school supplies, plants and produce grown on the property, and spirit wear • Equestrian/riding arena; temporary stabling • Electronic scoreboard; permanent and temporary sponsor signage; athletic field lighting; outdoor public address system; athletic field lighting • Outdoor parking and storage of farming machinery; grain bins; greenhouses • Concession/restroom buildings serving outdoor athletic venues • Perpendicular street parking along Mustang Way serving the athletic fields 157227/1 4 • School bus parking and garage 10. Add an additional paragraph 25. PARKING FOR HIGH SCHOOL. CITY recognizes that the enrollment of the high school student population will increase slowly over time, therefore CITY agrees to allow the school to open with forty percent (40%) of the required parking in place and the remaining sixty percent (60%) to be land banked and installed as determined by the CITY. 11. Add an additional paragraph 26. DEVELOPMENT NAME CHANGE. CITY agrees to allow OWNER/DEVELOPER to change the name of the development to Ashley Pointe. 12. Add an additional paragraph 27. SITE DEVELOPMENT. CITY agrees to issue a site development permit to the DEVELOPER prior to final engineering approval, for mass grading work on the PROPERTY. CITY further agrees to issue, upon submittal and approval of the proper plans, a building foundation only permit on the proposed School Property. 13. Add an additional paragraph 28. PARK SITE DEVELOPER agrees to construct a paved area at a size, and in a location of the CITY'S choosing to accommodate vehicular parking on Lot 359, the future Park Site. DEVELOPER shall be given a credit against remaining park fees owed the CITY for the PROPERTY after the lot 359 Park Site dedication. 157227/1 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have hereunto set their hands on this day of . 2013. CITY: OWNER/DEVELOPER: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE JOHN STEWART AND MICHELLE STEWART By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Prepared By: John F. Philipchuck Dommermuth, Cobine, West, Gensler, Philipchuck, Corrigan and Bernhard, Ltd. I I I E. Jefferson Ave., Suite 200 Naperville, IL 60540 630-355-5800 157227/1 6 EXHIBIT INDEX TO THE AMENDMENT EXHIBIT A REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT B FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT C FEES 157227/1 7 �HIBIT'A UNIT ONE: LOTS 1 THROUGH 10,INCLUSIVE,LOTS 12 THROUGH 41, INCLUSIVE,LOTS 43 THROUGH 50,INCLUSIVE,LOTS 52 THROUGH 63, INCLUSIVE,LOT 65 THROUGH 108,INCLUSIVE, LOTS 357 THROUGH 363,INCLUSIVE,AND LOT 365 IN PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 3 & 10,TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 31,2006,AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200600035287,IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. UNIT.2` THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 10,TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10;THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 10, 1776.14 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST,258.23 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 38 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST,AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST,269.09 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 68 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST,AN ARC LENGTH OF 262.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST,0.59 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 54 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST,AN ARC LENGTH OF 35.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 70.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 265.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 14 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST,AN ARC LENGTH OF 0.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 145.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, 37.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 116.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST, 153.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 112.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 111.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 55.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 90.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST, 85.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST,238.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, 13.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH I I DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST,288.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 127.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 267.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 22 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST,AN ARC LENGTH OF 46.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 216.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 02 SECONDS EAST, 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, 106.45 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 86.80 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 1 I DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, 80.00 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 07 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST,72.99 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 05 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 71.04 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST,71.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST,77.42 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 28 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 80.00 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, 87.88 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 15 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 106.01 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 52.39 FEET;THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST, 84.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10;THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER,74.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, 1006.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS CONVEYED TO ROBERT M.AND ELAINE E. STEWART BY DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST,ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LANDS PER DOCUMENT NO, 72-5656,2655.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS PER DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUAR'T'ER OF SAID SECTION 10,AND 1876.91 FEET SOUTHERLY OF(AS MEASURED ALONG SAID WEST LINE)THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 10, 1876,91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF KENDALL,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS,ANT) CONTAINING l 1019 ACRES'OF LAND.MORE OR LESS. 9 O guru rrwr aF sueatveswrr YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SUBDIVISION •WkW1"PP Purr oP sae Las i/i aP sii`fffi;r l0 1 Mxw x"m W c T .r..n [i8S 9r 1R3 Ta@lf PAiXLPab 6®,PNL1N uf0 A PRYB➢lYffiWR de d w¢I , / raasrxma aT mxxviva sL�eoana7 omx i,at JU vncran cm aP.....Lr",( rarxseoP.>rnoFaa ca¢m,aiurars _.— r� ra«. I ' 9 R d WIF FOR REVIEW ELIv..�..w v t` N N _ MNAL FIAT OF SUBDMMON YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SUBDIVISION tj�OF lit gg lag .L-za-- _ EXHIBIT E ASHLEY POINTE FEES PER UNIT A paid receipt from the School District Office, 602-A Center Parkway Yorkville,must be presented to the City prior to issuance of permit. $3,000 Separate Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District fee—made payable to Y.B.S.D. $1,400 United City of Yorkville Fees 1. Building Permit Cost$650 plus $0.20 per square foot $650+$0.20(SF) 2. Water Connection Fees SF and DU $3,700 2+Bed Att N/A 3. Water Meter Cost Detached Units $ 435 Attached Units N/A 4. City Sewer Connection Fees $2,000 5. Water and Sewer Inspection Fee $ 25 6. Public Walks/Driveway Inspection Fee $ 35 7. Development Fees Public Works $700 Police $300 Building $150 Library (see note"d"below) $500 * $250 Parks &Recreation $ 50 Engineering $100 Bristol-Kendall Fire(see note"c"below) $1000 * $500 Development Fee Total $2,300 8. Land Cash Fees(see note"a"below) Apartment Townhome Duplex Single Family Park N/A N/A N/A N/A School N/A N/A N/A $1,493.89 Land-Cash Fees Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400,365.00 9. All Road Contributions N/A; to be satisfied by improvements to Penman/Rt. 126; Ashley Road/Rt. 126; and Ashley Road Improvements 1 57227/1 12 10. Weather Warning Siren Fee(see note"b"below) $75/acre a. Remaining Park fee contribution satisfied by construction of a parking lot on the Park site. School fees are $1,493.89 per lot,payable at building permit. For upfront land-cash donations figures,please refer to"Land- Cash"worksheet, attached. b. $75/acre x 193.81 =$14,535. $54.24/lot payable at building permit C. 50%of BKFD fee for Unit 1 paid($52,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1, (104)pay$500/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay$1,000/lot at building permit. d. 50%of Library fee for Unit 1 paid($26,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1, (104)pay$250.00/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay$500/lot at building permit. 157227/1 13 156567 1.XLS YORKVILLE LAND/CASH_ CALCULATION SHEET CLIENT/PROJECT: STEWART/ASHLEY POINTE - TABLE OF ESTIMATED ULTIMATE POPULATION PER DWELLING UNIT j i Elementary I Junior High _ High School F-School Grades K 5 Grades K 8 -Grades 9 12 Adults Total Per - .... - TYPE OF UNIT Years 5-12 Years 11-13 Years 14-17 Years 18 years+ Dwelling Unit Detached Single Family l J.. 2 Bedroom x 0.102 0.000 x 0.191 I—= 0-000 x 0 054 0 000 x 0.057- 0.000 x 1.694=, 0.000 x 2.098 0.000 0 3 Bedroom x 0.254 0-000 x 0.440 0.000 x 0126= 0 000 x 0.179 0 000 x 1 921- 0,000 x 2.920 0,000 - _ - 268 4 Bedroom x 0 413=1 110.684 x 0.665= 178.220 x 0.190= 50-920 x 0.34-r 91.120 x 2.142= 574.056 x 3.75 1005.000 _. - _ -_ _.... _ ...... - _ 0.000 - -- 268 5 Bedroom ts x 0 236 0.000 x 0.488- 0 000 x 0 i 39 0 000 x 0.249- - 000 x 2 637 0 000 x 3 749- Attached Single Family 1 Bedroom 0 0.000 x 0.064=1 0-000 x 0.018- 0.000 x 0.037= 0.000 x 1 068 0.000 x 1.187 0.000 i. 01;2 Bedroom x 0.092 0.066 x 0.19$= 0.000 x 0.056 0 000 x 0.074- 0.000 x 1.776- 0A00 x 2.196- 0.000 _.. 3 Bedroom x 0.231= 0,000 x 0.298- 0.000 x 0 085- 0 000 x 0.103 0.000 x 1,805- 0.000 x 2.522=' 0000 . _ 4 Bedroom x 0,332= 0,000 x 0.452 0.000 x 0.13-, 0 000 x 0.205 0.000 x 2 243 0.000 x 3.362 0,000 .... _ 0,Total Units ` Apartments 1 � a -- -- _.- y 0,000 x 0 018-1 0 000 x 0.037-' 0 000 x 1 36-__ 0.000 x 1 479 0.000 Efficiency 0 0.000 x 0.064 0 2 Bedroom x 0042 0.000 x 016 D 000 x 045 0 000 x p038 0.00 x 1.749- 0.000 x 1.869=, 0.000 1 Bedroom 0 0.000 x 0.6 079 0 000 x i 614- 0 000 x 1 94 0,000 3 Bedroom x 0 050- 0.000 x 0.339- 0.000 x 0.096- 0 000 x 0.153- 0 OOD x 2 499- 0-000 x 3.137- 0.000 -_ _ O,Total Units � n People Produced ITotal= 110.684 Total= 178.220 Total= 50 920EML Total= 91.120 Total= 574.056 Grand Total'' 1005.000:Total Land Land Value 5 0 0.00 Lion Total Land Donation for p'pool 16.014617 0: Tofal Cash Equivalent�Sch 1): $400,365,00 50.00 Donation for School: 050000 _ -- - Total Cash Equivalent Park Total Land Only Donation Required: �� 26.064617 Total Cash Only Donation Required: $651,615.00 � N Dommermuth Cobine West Gensler Philipchuck Prepared Corrigan and Bernhard,Ltd. 7/2/2013 Page 1 156567_1.XLS kn ANALYSIS OF ACTUAL AMOUNTS OWED 1 ; i PARK DONATION -- Additional Donation Required uired Per Worksheet 10.050000 es Acr. Actual Park Dedication 6.6700001 Acres -- - I Total Amount of Park Unsatisfied by Donation 3.380000 Acres Land Value per Agreement I $25,000.00 Contribution 3,380000 Unsatisfied Park Contri Donation Required forl'ark $84,500.00 To be satisfied by grading,seeding and bicycle path Total Additional Cash Donation Required for Park i $0:00 i I SCHOOL DONATION Pre-School added to Elementary ary Students) 4 school classification er x :per ctassmification eudation = Acres to be Estimated chi per dedicated maximum school classifi- f of school size ,cation reccomendation .. . . - 0 - = 6.514942 Acres 288.904000 x 7 25 Acre s C 50.920000 x 15.92 Acres - 1.885750 Acres 429.88 91.120000 x 49.30 Acres - 7.613925 Acres 590 16.014617Acres Dom mermuth Cobine West Gensler Philipchuck Prepared Corrigan and Bernhard,Ltd. 7/2/2013 Page 2 Red-lined version STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SS COUNTY OF KENDALL ) FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT OF YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT AND THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION) This First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement (the "AMENDMENT"), is made and entered into this day of , 2013, by and between the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, a municipal corporation (the "CITY"), and the owner of record John Stewart and Michelle Stewart, ("OWNER" or "DEVELOPER" or"OWNER/DEVELOPER"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, OWNER owns fee simple title to the real property which is legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, consisting of approximately 190 acres, more or less (hereinafter"PROPERTY"); WHEREAS, on April 26, 2005, the CITY annexed and zoned the PROPERTY in an R-2 Single Family Residence District in accordance with the terms of the "Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development and The United City of Yorkville" ("AGREEMENT"); WHEREAS, the original owner and developer under the Agreement was unable to complete the development of the PROPERTY; WHEREAS, the Final Plat for Unit 1 of the Property was recorded and the improvements required under Unit 1 were substantially completed; WHEREAS, the Final Plat for Unit 2 was not recorded; WHEREAS, the OWNER/DEVELOPER subsequently acquired the PROPERTY, described in Exhibit"A"to the AMENDMENT; WHEREAS, the OWNER/DEVELOPER desires to amend the AGREEMENT to provide for a re-subdivision of Lot 358 for a private high school; amend the donations and contributions; and seek other exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance; WHEREAS, R-2 Zoning under the CITY's ordinances allows for a school as a permitted use; 157226/1 1 WHEREAS, all notices required by law relating to this AMENDMENT have been given to the persons or entities entitled thereto, pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the CITY have duly fixed the time for a public hearing on this AMENDMENT and pursuant to legal notice have held such hearing thereon all as required by the provisions of the Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have duly held all public hearings relating to AMENDMENT all as required by the provisions of the CITY's Ordinances and Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, in accordance with the powers granted to the CITY by the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-1 through 15.1-5 (2002), inclusive, relating to annexation agreements, the parties hereto wish to enter into this binding AMENDMENT of the AGREEMENT and to provide for various other matters related directly or indirectly to amending the annexation of the PROPERTY, as authorized by, the provisions of said statutes; WHEREAS, pursuant to due notice and publication in the manner provided by law, the Plan Commission of the CITY have had such public hearing and have taken all further action required by the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15-1.3 (2002) and the ordinances of the CITY relating to the procedure for authorization, approval and execution of the subdivision of Lot 358 by the CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements and conditions herein contained, and by authority of and in accordance with the aforesaid statutes of the State of Illinois, the parties agree as follows: 1. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT. OWNER has filed with the Clerk of the CITY a duly and properly executed Application to Amend Annexation Agreement pursuant to, and in accordance with the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/7-1-1 et seq. (2002). CITY agrees to adopt any necessary ordinances to amend the AGREEMENT as soon as reasonably practical. To the extent there is a conflict between the terms of the AMENDMENT and the AGREEMENT, the terms of the AMENDMENT shall control. 2. ZONING. That said paragraph be amended as follow: A. PROPERTY shall be developed in substantial compliance with the ordinances of the CITY in effect at the time of passage of this AMENDMENT to AGREEMENT except as modified by said AMENDMENT. B. The CITY shall approve the revised final plat of subdivision of Lot 358 in Prestwick of Yorkville, Unit 1, prepared by HR Green dated July 2, 2013, last revised 157226/1 2 August 6, 2013, attached hereto as Exhibit B, with such amendments as are required pursuant to the City Engineer's letter dated September 5, 2013, items 60 thru 63 inclusive. , and appfaves the revised impfavement plans attaehed hereto as Exhibit D. 3. Paragraph 5 DONATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONS. be amended as follows: A. DEVELOPER shall receive a credit against all City and County road impact fees for the improvements by the DEVELOPER to Il Route 126 at Penman Road, Ashley Road and Route 126 intersection and Ashley Road improvements adjacent to the PROPERTY. B. DEVELOPER shall pay revised school and park land-cash fees or provide land dedication as required under the terms of this AMENDMENT and Exhibit E attached hereto. 4. Paragraph 6 SECURITY INVESTMENTS. Amend by providing an additional paragraph to read as follows: OWNER/DEVELOPER has provided CITY with a Subdivision Bond for the Prestwick Subdivision in the amount of One-Million Eight-Hundred Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Eighty-Four and 00/100's Dollars ($1,879,684.00). CITY agrees to reduce said bond so as not to bond for street parkway/trees and public side-walk improvements. CITY agrees to instead obtain any surety needed for such improvements from the builder of the home on each lot. Developer will provide any required security for the high school improvements, including roadways. 5. Paragraph 9 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCES. Amend to read as follows: CITY agrees to amend the five (5) years where referenced throughout said paragraph to ten (10) years, said ten (10) years commencing from the approval date of this AMENDMENT. 6. Paragraph 11 FEES AND CHARGES. Shall be revised as follows: Notwithstanding the provisions of the AGREEMENT the fees due and owing to the CITY for those fees and amounts shall be set forth in the revised Exhibit E attached hereto and made a part of this AMENDMENT. The Owner acknowledges that the donations contained in this Agreement, and the City Code, are made voluntarily by the OWNER, and the OWNER hereby waives for itself and its successors and assigns the right to contest at any time in the future, the validity or the amount of the donations. 157226/1 3 7. Paragraph 18 NOTICES AND REMEDIES. Shall be amended as follows: City Attorney: Kathleen Field-Orr&Associates 53 W. Jackson Boulevard, Suite 964 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Developer: John Stewart and Michelle Stewart 3874 N. IL Route 71 Sheridan, IL 60118 Developer Attorney: John F. Philipchuck Dommermuth, Cobine, West, Gensler, Philipchuck, Corrigan and Bernhard, Ltd. 111 E. Jefferson Ave., Suite 200 Naperville, IL 60540 Telephone: 630-355-5800 Facsimile: 630-355-5976 8. Paragraph 22 GENERAL PROVISIONS. H. Term of Agreement Shall be amended as follows: The term of this AGREEMENT shall be twenty (20) years. In the event that a permit for construction is issued within said twenty-year period all of the terms of this AGREEMENT for that permit shall remain enforceable despite said time limitation, unless modified by written agreement of the CITY and OWNER/DEVELOPER. 9. Add an additional paragraph 24. SCHOOL PROPERTY. OWNER/DEVELOPER intends to develop the re-subdivided Lot 358 to accommodate an approximately 32 acre site for a private high school. CITY agrees that the existing R-2 One-Family Residence allows as a permitted use schools; including denominational or private, elementary and high, including playgrounds, garages for school buses and athletic fields. In addition, the CITY agrees to permit the following accessory and auxiliary uses all as permitted uses: • Retail store, not to exceed 3,000 sq. ft.; Selling school supplies, plants and produce grown on the property, and spirit wear • Equestrian/riding arena; temporary stabling • Electronic scoreboard; permanent and temporary sponsor signage; athletic field lighting; outdoor public address system; athletic field lighting • Outdoor parking and storage of farming machinery; grain bins; greenhouses • Concession/restroom buildings serving outdoor athletic venues • Perpendicular street parking along Mustang Way serving the athletic fields 157226/1 4 • School bus parking and garage 10. Add an additional paragraph 25. PARKING FOR HIGH SCHOOL. CITY recognizes that the enrollment of the high school student population will increase slowly over time, therefore CITY agrees to allow the school to open with forty percent (40%) of the required parking in place and the remaining sixty percent (60%) to be land banked and installed as determined by the CITY. 11. Add an additional paragraph 26. DEVELOPMENT NAME CHANGE. CITY agrees to allow OWNER/DEVELOPER to change the name of the development to Ashley Pointe. 12. Add an additional paragraph 27. SITE DEVELOPMENT. CITY agrees to issue a site development permit to the DEVELOPER prior to final engineering approval, for mass grading work on the PROPERTY. CITY further agrees to issue, upon submittal and approval of the proper plans, a building foundation only permit on the proposed School Property. 13. Add an additional paragraph 28. PARK SITE DEVELOPER agrees to construct a paved area at a size, and in a location of the CITY'S choosing to accommodate vehicular parking on Lot 359, the future Park Site. DEVELOPER shall be given a credit against remaining park fees owed the CITY for the PROPERTY after the lot 359 Park Site dedication. 157226/1 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands on this day of . 2013. CITY: OWNER/DEVELOPER: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE JOHN STEWART AND MICHELLE STEWART By: Mayor Attest: City Clerk Prepared By: John F. Philipchuck Dommermuth, Cobine, West, Gensler, Philipchuck, Corrigan and Bernhard, Ltd. 111 E. Jefferson Ave., Suite 200 Naperville, IL 60540 630-355-5800 157226/1 6 EXHIBIT INDEX TO THE AMENDMENT EXHIBIT A REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT B FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT C T-EMPORARV hlFT- STATION (NOT ATTACHED) EXHIBIT D M4PROVED PLANS (FINAL ENGINEERING NOT ATTACHW EXHIBIT EC FEES 157226/1 7 �HIBIT'A UNIT ONE: LOTS 1 THROUGH 10,INCLUSIVE,LOTS 12 THROUGH 41, INCLUSIVE,LOTS 43 THROUGH 50,INCLUSIVE,LOTS 52 THROUGH 63, INCLUSIVE,LOT 65 THROUGH 108,INCLUSIVE, LOTS 357 THROUGH 363,INCLUSIVE,AND LOT 365 IN PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 3 & 10,TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 31,2006,AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200600035287,IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. UNIT.2` THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 10,TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10;THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 10, 1776.14 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST,258.23 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 38 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST,AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST,269.09 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 68 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST,AN ARC LENGTH OF 262.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST,0.59 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 54 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST,AN ARC LENGTH OF 35.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 70.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 265.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 14 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST,AN ARC LENGTH OF 0.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 145.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, 37.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 116.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST, 153.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 112.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 111.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 55.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 90.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST, 85.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST,238.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, 13.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH I I DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST,288.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 127.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 267.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 22 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST,AN ARC LENGTH OF 46.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 216.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 02 SECONDS EAST, 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, 106.45 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 86.80 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 1 I DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, 80.00 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 07 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST,72.99 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 05 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 71.04 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST,71.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST,77.42 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 28 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 80.00 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, 87.88 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 15 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 106.01 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 52.39 FEET;THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST, 84.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10;THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER,74.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, 1006.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS CONVEYED TO ROBERT M.AND ELAINE E. STEWART BY DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST,ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LANDS PER DOCUMENT NO, 72-5656,2655.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS PER DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUAR'T'ER OF SAID SECTION 10,AND 1876.91 FEET SOUTHERLY OF(AS MEASURED ALONG SAID WEST LINE)THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST,ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 10, 1876,91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF KENDALL,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS,ANT) CONTAINING l 1019 ACRES'OF LAND.MORE OR LESS. 10 eaP1aC Kun YMAL PUT OF su]]Drv9 N YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SUBDIVISION •xuxmvtRa+PP Purr oY sae Las i/i aY sii`fffi;r l0 161Rri .16[*aRiB W c T .r..n [i8S 9r 1R3 Ta@lf 8LP{�6®,PNL1N uf0 A PRYFa1lYffiW.k aY d.OT 3]E , / r�asrxma aT mxxviva s��eonnaeom,omx i,at tlu vncran Lar aP xaexsnr� rarxseoP.>rnoFaa ca¢m,aiurars _.— r� I ' R I jI9$9 d WIF FOR REVIEW ELIv..�..w v N N r n MOLL PLAT(IF SUEDMISION P1%.PT.05 10_Pp,_,,Wy YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SUBDIVISION tj2 OF A RPSVImes�g(ON Or OF Y-.KMJE, xz�_ T4 Z34 lit MI-Re RIZZ. gg �-4 lag 2 W-A IMMEMM EXHIBIT E ASHLEY POINTE FEES PER UNIT A paid receipt from the School District Office, 602-A Center Parkway Yorkville,must be presented to the City prior to issuance of permit. $3,000 Separate Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District fee—made payable to Y.B.S.D. $1,400 United City of Yorkville Fees 1. Building Permit Cost$650 plus $0.20 per square foot $650+$0.20(SF) 2. Water Connection Fees SF and DU $3,700 2+Bed Att N/A 3. Water Meter Cost Detached Units $ 435 Attached Units N/A 4. City Sewer Connection Fees $2,000 5. Water and Sewer Inspection Fee $ 25 6. Public Walks/Driveway Inspection Fee $ 35 7. Development Fees Public Works $700 Police $300 Building $150 Library (see note"d"below) $500 * $250 Parks &Recreation $ 50 Engineering $100 Bristol-Kendall Fire(see note"c"below) $1000 * $500 Development Fee Total $2,300 8. Land Cash Fees(see note"a"below) Apartment Townhome Duplex Single Family Park N/A N/A N/A N/A School N/A N/A N/A $1,493.89 Land-Cash Fees Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $400,365.00 9. All Road Contributions N/A; to be satisfied by improvements to Penman/Rt. 126; Ashley Road/Rt. 126; and Ashley Road Improvements 157226/1 13 10. Weather Warning Siren Fee(see note"b"below) $75/acre a. Remaining Park fee contribution satisfied by construction of a parking lot on the Park site. Park site ,.,..,a;. g seeding, and installation .,4'bicycle per School fees are $1,493.89 per lot,payable at building permit. For upfront land-cash donations figures,please refer to "Land-Cash" worksheet, attached. b. $75/acre x 193.81 =$14,535. $54.24/lot payable at building permit C. 50%of BKFD fee for Unit 1 paid($52,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1, (104)pay$500/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay$1,000/lot at building permit. d. 50%of Library fee for Unit 1 paid($26,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1, (104)pay$250.00/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay$500/lot at building permit. 157226/1 14 156567_1.XLS v� YORKVILLE LAND/CASH_ CALCULATION SHEET CLIENT/PROJECT: STEWART/ASHLEY POINTE - TABLE OF ESTIMATED ULTIMATE POPULATION PER DWELLING UNIT j i Elementary I Junior High _ High School F-School Grades K 5 Grades K 8 -Grades 9 12 Adults Total Per - .... - TYPE OF UNIT Years 5-12 Years 11-13 Years 14-17 Years 18 years+ Dwelling Unit Detached Single Family J.. 2 Bedroom x 0.102 0.000 x 0.191=' 0 000 x 0 054 0 000 x 0.057- 0.000 x 1.694=, 0.000 x 2.098 0.000 0 3 Bedroom x 0.254 0-000 x 0.440 0.000 x 0126= 0 000 x 0.179 0 000 x 1 921- 0,0010'.. x 2.920 0,000 - _ - ... 268 4 Bedroom x 0 413=1 110.684 x 0.665= 178.220 x 0.190= 50 920 x 0.34-r 91.120 x 2,142= 574.056 x 3.75 1_005.000 _.... _ ...... - _ O.ODO - -- 268 5 Bedroom ts x 0 236 0.000 x 0.488- 0 000 x 0139 D 000 x 0.249- 0.000 x 2 637 0 000 x 3 749- Attached Single Family 1 Bedroom 0 0.000 x 0.064=1 0-000 x 0.018- 0.000 x 0.037= 0.000 x 1 068 0.000 x 1.187 0.000 01;2 Bedroom x 0.092 0.066 x 0.19$= 0.000 x 0.056 0 000 x 0.074- 0.000 x 1.776- 0A00 x 2.196- 0.000 _.. 3 Bedroom x 0.231= 0 000 x 0.298- 0.000 x 0 085- 0 000 x 0.103 0 000 x 1 805- 0.000 x 2.522=' 0,000 4 Bedroom x 0,332= 0,000 x p.452 0.000 x 0,13-, 0X0 x 0205 0.000 x 2.243 0.000 x 3.362 0,000 0,Total Units ` Apartments 1 � a -- -- Y 0,000 x 0 018-I 0.000 x 0.037-' 0 000 x 1 36-__ 0.000 x 1.479 0.000 Efficient 0 0.000 x 0.064 0 2 Bedroom x 0042 0.000 x 016 0'..10.00 x 045 0 000 x p038 0.000 x 1.749- 0.000 x 1.869=, 0.000 1 Bedroom 0 0.000 x 0.6 _ ... _ 079 0.000 x 1.614- 0,000 x 1.94 0,000 3 Bedroom x U50- 0.000 x 0.339- 0.000 x 0.096- 0 000 x D.153- 0 000 x 2 499- 0-000 x 3.137- 0.000 -_ _ O,Total Units n People Produced Total 1 110.684 Total= 178.220 Total= 50 920 Total= 91.120 Total= 574.056 Grand Total'' 1005.000 Land Value 5 0 O�OOmp on Total and Donation for Park:hool 16.01461'7 Total Cash Equivalent(School): $400,350.00 Donation for School: 050000 _ -- - Total Cash E quivalent(Park): Total Land Only Donation Required: 26.0646177ota1 Cash Only Donation Required: 1 $651,615.00 N Dommermuth Cobine West Gensler Philipchuck Prepared Corrigan and Bernhard,Ltd. 7/2/2013 Page 1 156567_1.XLS ANALYSIS OF ACTUAL AMOUNTS OWED 1 ; i PARK DONATION -- Additional Donation Required uired Per Worksheet 10.050000 es Acr. Actual Park Dedication 6.6700001 Acres -- - I Total Amount of Park Unsatisfied by Donation 3.380000 Acres Land Value per Agreement I $25,000.00 Contribution 3,380000 Unsatisfied Park Contri Donation Required forl'ark $84,500.00 To be satisfied by grading,seeding and bicycle path Total Additional Cash Donation Required for Park i $0:00 I SCHOOL DONATION Pre-School added to Elementary ary Students) 4 school classification er x :per ctassmification eudation = Acres to be Estimated chi per dedicated maximum school classifi- f of school size ,cation reccomendation .. . . - 0 - = 6.514942 Acres 288.904000 x 7 25 Acre s C 50.920000 x 15.92 Acres - 1.885750 Acres 429.88 91.120000 x :!49.30 Acres - 7.613925 Acres 590 N 16.014617 Acres ; 1 I Dom mermuth Cobine West Gensler Philipchuck Prepared Corrigan and Bernhard,Ltd. 7/2/2013 Page 2 Engineering Enterprises, i i September 5, 2013 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 2 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Dear Krysti: We are in receipt of the following documents prepared for Yorkville Christian School for the above referenced project: • Final Engineering Plans prepared by HR Green, dated of August 23, 2013. • Landscape Plans prepared by Hitchcock Design Group, dated August 22, 2013. • Lighting Plan Prepared by U.S. Architectural Lighting, dated August 21, 2013. • Sanitary Sewer PE Calculation prepared by HR Green, dated July 30, 2013. • Final Plat of Subdivision Yorkville Christian School Subdivision prepared by HR Green, dated August 6, 2013 • Storm Sewer Design Report prepared by HR Green, dated August 22, 2013. • Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report, Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision prepared by SEC Group, Inc. (HR Green), dated April 3, 2007. • Comment Response Letters (2) prepared by HR Green, dated August 22, 2013. • Comment Response Letter prepared by Smith Engineering (HR Green), dated July 19, 2007. • Traffic Impact Study prepared by KLOA, Inc., dated August 22, 2013. Our review of these plans is to generally determine their compliance with local ordinances and whether the improvements will conform to existing local systems and equipment. This review and our comments do not relieve the designer from his duties to conform to all required codes, regulations, and acceptable standards of engineering practice. Engineering Enterprises, Inc.'s review is not intended as an in-depth quality assurance review, we cannot and do not assume responsibility for design errors or omissions in the plans. As such, we offer the following comments: 52 Wheeler Road, 5ugar Grove, IL 60554— (630) 466-6700 tel — (630) 466-6701 fax —www.eeiweb.com Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble September 5, 2013 Page 2 of 7 FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS General 1. Submittal of revised final engineering plans shall be dated, signed and sealed by a professional engineer. 2. Design for the construction of Whitekirk Lane from Sta. 810±52 to Sta. 822±57 shall be incorporated into the signed and sealed set of plans and modified accordingly to reflect the proposed and as-built improvements. 3. The submittal date shall be included on all the Final Engineering plan sheets. Currently all but the cover sheet has only the year 2013 as the date of the plans. 4. Final engineering plans shall be prepared and submitted for review for the construction of the offsite Ashley Road storm sewer. This shall include the abandonment/disconnection of the existing 10 inch diameter drain tile that is referenced in the Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report on Page 2. Which reads in part, "During Phase II, the drain tile will be removed and the proposed storm sewer and stormwater detention system will be constructed." The existing drain tile currently serves as the discharge for existing detention Basin 3B (located along the west side of Ashley Road and east of the proposed school and the use of the existing drain tile was only to be temporary until construction of Phase II. 5. Final engineering plans shall be prepared and submitted for review for the construction of the improvements to Route 126 and the Penman Road and Ashley Road intersections. We recommend that the following statement be added to the annexation agreement: The improvements to IL Route 126 at Penman Road and IL Route 126 at Ashley Road must be substantially completed prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the school. 6. Plans shall be developed for the improvement to Ashley Road across the subdivision limits to bring the road up to current City standards for a rural cross-section as specified in the annexation agreement for the subdivision. The pavement width should be 24' edge to edge with 2' aggregate shoulders. The pavement design shall be consistent with the minor collector standards noted in the City's Standard Specifications. 7. Roadway stationing shall be added to Whitekirk Lane/Mustang Way on all plan sheets. 8. We recommend that the attached requirements for earthwork be referenced and included within the annexation agreement. Typical Street Cross Sect!ons/Specificatio ns 9. We recommend roadway stationing be added to the typical sections to clarify the section of roadway identified. 10. The use of PSM PVC (ASTM D-3034) pipe for sanitary sewer applications is not allowed per City standards and this reference shall be deleted from the approved pipe materials (Sheet C-03). Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble September 5, 2013 Page 3 of 7 Site Plan 11. The future soccer field and bike path are shown to extend north into the adjacent stormwater/open space lot (Lot 2) to be conveyed to the HOA. The school shall verify that this encroachment is acceptable to the HOA and if so, secure all necessary easements and agreements. 12. Six handicap accessible (HC) parking stalls are identified on the site plan. This is sufficient for the proposed 191 stalls for Phase 1; however, the engineer should look at the ultimate number of HC stalls that will be required for the parking lot including the future parking area identified north of the proposed lot in front of the building. At final build out approximately 330 stalls will be built and that would require 2 additional HC stalls. We would recommend the 2 additional HC stalls included in the design now since there are special requirements for the HC stalls relative to slopes and proximity to entrances. We recommend adding the 2 HC stalls to the line of four HC stalls on the west end of the main parking lot. 13. There are currently 24 parking stalls proposed in the isle closest to the front of the school. This long run of parking stalls should be broken up with the installation of a landscape island. Considering the addition of 2 HC parking stalls noted above, we recommend adding a landscape island on the north side of the bank of HC stalls. This would result in a layout across the front of the school of 6 HC stalls, a landscape island and a run of 15 regular parking stalls. In addition, a landscape island should be created in the northwest corner of the parking lot in the irregular shaped corner of the parking lot. 14. A dumpster pad and enclosure shall be shown on the plans. 15. Roadway stationing for Whitekirk Lane should be included on the plans. 16. Signage should be added along the proposed student drop-off area for "No Parking — Drop-off Only". 17. If buses will be using the entry circle, a turning exhibit with buses should be prepared and submitted for review. 18. A striped pedestrian crosswalk shall be added to the one way access to the parking lot at the southwest corner of the parking lot adjacent to the access drive. 19. The sign at this entrance shall be identified on the plan. 20. The sign key #4 in the Sign Legend is not used on the plan and should be removed from the legend if not used. 21. The hatch legend identifies heavy duty pavement and truncated dome areas but no such areas are identified on the plans. These areas shall be located on the plans or reference to the hatch removed from the legend. 22. The last note in the Project Notes appears to have the words "curb" and "sidewalk" reversed. The note should be review and revised accordingly. 23. The engineer should consider having the main exit from the site being 2 lanes, a dedicated left out only and straight/right turn lane. This configuration could reduce the potential for excessive backups during peak demand. The exit lane may have to be widened a few feet to accommodate 2 dedicated lanes. Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble September 5, 2013 Page 4 of 7 24. The current plan shows future sidewalks on the east side of Whitekirk Lane/Mustang Way. This configuration would have a crosswalk on Mustang Way on the east side of Whitekirk Lane that is not stop controlled for westbound traffic. The future sidewalk shown on the east side of Whitekirk Lane at the Mustang Way outlet to Ashley Road should be removed so that there is not a crosswalk on this leg of the intersection. The future crosswalks across Whitekirk Lane on the north leg of the intersection and across Mustang Way on the south leg of the intersection and the proposed crosswalk across the school access drive on the west leg of the intersection shall remain. 25. The future mid-block crosswalks on the east side of Whitekirk Lane shall be removed from the plans. 26. A detail for a bike rack is provided on the plans but a location is not identified. The location of the proposed bike rack shall be shown on the plans. 27. A future security entrance gate is shown on the Detailed Site Plan. Installation of the future gated access will require coordination with the police and fire departments. Drainage & Grades 28. Additional spot grades shall be added to the plans to the parking lot islands as necessary to define the drainage around islands and in the curb lines. 29. The accessible parking area in the main parking lot does not conform to ADA standards and shall be reviewed and revised accordingly. The slopes in the HC stalls exceed the maximum 2% slope requirement. The slopes cannot exceed 2% in any direction, horizontal, longitudinal or diagonal. 30. Overland overflow routes though the site are not identified on the grading plan. Overland flow routes through the site to the detention basins shall be shown on the plans. 31. The current grading plan has the areas from the future athletic fields and future parking fields in the south section of the site flowing overland east to the proposed main access drive then paralleling the access drive and flowing southeast across the future Mustang Way roadway south of the access drive toward Ashley Road. This area is to flow to the existing detention basin east of Whitekirk Lane (Basin 3B). The grading plan shall be revised to direct the overland overflow route to Basin 3B. A suggested route would be across the main access drive at approximate Sta. 3005+00, into the proposed parking lot and on to Whitekirk Lane to the overflow section at approximate Sta. 814+75 to the Basin 3B. 32. As a result of the above mentioned overland overflow route across the main access drive, the summit of the access drive at Whitekirk Lane may need to be moved west to approximate Sta. 3007+75 and raised to a pavement elevation of ±710.5. The grading plan is to be reviewed and revised accordingly to accommodate the overland overflow routes. 33. Spot grades in the pavement adjacent to storm sewer structures shall be reviewed and coordinated with the storm sewer structure rim elevations given on the Utility Tag Sheet. There are several discrepancies for these elevations in the proposed parking lot. 34. The engineering should consider replacing the proposed curb frames and grates in the future parking areas with Type 8 grates for maintenance purposes. Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble September 5, 2013 Page 5 of 7 35. Two 15-foot Public Utility and Drainage Easements shall be obtained for the proposed storm sewers from Whitekirk Lane to detention Basin 3B, at Sta. 814±85 and Sta. 819±77. 36. The proposed contours for Whitekirk Lane are erratic north of Sta. 816+00, east of Whitekirk Lane and along Mustang Way out to Ashley Road where it is difficult to follow the proposed grading. These areas should be reviewed and the proposed contours cleaned up so the proposed grading can be reviewed. 37. We would recommend removing the erosion control references from the grading plan to clean up the grading plan since a separate Erosion Qontrol Plan is provided. 38. It appears the storm sewer segment in Whitekirk Lane from MH 259 to IN 262 is left over from the previous design and is not required. 39. The engineer should consider relocating CB 254 from the east side of Whitekirk Lane to the west side of the road at Sta. 814±70. 40. It should be noted that the future storm sewers as shown through the future athletic fields are to serve off-site areas to the west and these areas are to drain to the exiting detention basins north and east of the proposed school. This being the case, the 100-year runoff from the off-site areas will need to be routed through the school site either overland or in an oversized storm sewer or both. 41. Design calculations for the sizing of the proposed 15-inch culvert across Mustang Way at Ashley Road shall be provided. Water Main 42. The 2-inch water service to the school shall not tap off the 6-inch fire service line and shall be connected directly to the 6-inch private water main. 43. The proposed valve on the 6-inch fire service shall be removed. There should not be a valve on the fire line from the 6-inch private main to the building. 44. The configuration of the water main at the dead ends at Mustang Way and Ashley Road shall be revised as follows. A valve shall be at the end of the line with the hydrant installed on the pressure side of the main. A 5-foot diameter vault shall be used in these locations in lieu of a valve box so the valve can be blocked against the vault wall. 45. We are recommending valve 651 in Mustang Way be relocated to the8-inch water main in Whitekirk Lane just north of the school's main access drive and valve 816 in Whitekirk Lane be relocated north on the 8-inch main so it is located between the two 6-inch mains serving the school. 46. A conflict table shall be added to Overall Utility Plan. 47. The Legend on the Overall Utility Plan identifies the use of water main casing but it cannot be determined where the water main casing is to be installed. If no water main casing is to be installed then it shall be removed from the Legend. Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble September 5, 2013 Page 6 of 7 Sanitary Sewer 48. IEPA Division of Water Pollution Control permit applications shall be submitted for review and approval since the proposed sanitary sewer discharge in excess of 1,500 GPD. 49. The sanitary sewer service from the main to the building shall be shown in profile since an IEPA permit is required for the service. 50. Engineering plans must be submitted to the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District for review. Comments are to be forwarded to us upon receipt. 51. A manhole shall be added to the upstream end of the sanitary sewer service in place of the proposed cleanout. 52. A detail for the construction of the proposed drop connection on existing sanitary MH 820 shall be added to Detail Sheet C-14. Erosion Control 53. Existing utilities should be shown on the Erosion Control Plan. 54. Additional barrier silt fencing shall be installed along the perimeter of the disturbed areas adjacent to the proposed grading for the future Mustang Way roadway and along the rear yards for the lots on Callander Trail. 55. Additional erosion control measures, including ditch checks, should be considered for installation across the proposed drainage swales through the future athletic fields, overland overflow routes to the detention basins and the regraded Ashley Road drainage ditch. 56. It appears an off-site location (the adjacent City Park site) will be utilized for the temporary stockpiling of material. The engineer/developer shall verify that this area is included in the IEPA NOI and the project's SWPPP. Site Lighting 57. Additional pedestrian lighting for the sidewalks should be considered. There is no lighting proposed for the sidewalk that connects the main parking lot with parking lot in the rear of the school and light levels are below 0.5 fc in the proposed sidewalk from the main parking lot to the school entrance. Consideration shall be given to add additional pedestrian lighting in these areas. Landscaping/Signage 58. There are three off-site signs proposed for the school. Off-site easements should be obtained for the installation and maintenance of the signs and associated landscaping. 59. The detail numbers in the call out bubbles for the signs on Sheet L2.2 shall be reviewed and revised accordingly to match the appropriate detail. Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble September 5, 2013 Page 7 of 7 FINAL PLAT 60. On Sheet 1 in the Legend, the words "and utilities purposes" shall be added after "...For Public Right-of-Way" 61. The 10.0' P.U. & D.E.'s through the site for the off-site storm sewer shall be increased to 15.0'. The perimeter 10.0' P.U. & D.E.'s can remain as shown. 62. The text under Lot 2 shall be revised to read "S.M.E. & P.U.& D.E.", not "S.M.E. & Open Space" and the statement "To Be Conveyed To The HOX shall be moved to be between the lot number and the lot acreage. 63. Since easements are to be vacated, signature blocks for all parties that have rights to the easements to be vacated shall be added to Sheet 2 of the plat. The developer should provide the requested information and make the necessary revisions and submit two (2) sets of plans for further review. If you have any questions regarding the above or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. Bradley P. Sanderson, P.E. Vice President PC: Mr. Bart Olson, City Administrator Mr. Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Ms. Laura Schraw, Director of Parks and Recreation Ms. Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Mr. David Schultz, HR Green BJA, JAM, EEI 1\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Docs\Public\Yorkville\2013\YO1313-DR Prestwick-Unit 2\Docs\Icoy Final Engineering Plans Review 02.doc ITEMS REQUIRED PRIOR TO EARTHWORK UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 1. Stormwater Management Report approved and permit issued by the City. 2. Approved Grading and Soil Erosion Sedimentation Control Plans, 3. Existing floodplain and/or floodway areas must be clearly identified on site. 4. Existing wetland areas and required buffer zones must be clearly identified on-site. 5. Agency Approvals • Transportation Permits (for construction access only) • IDNR and IHPA environmental sign-offs • IEPA NOI • Army Corps 6. Performance Guarantee on file with the City. 7. Insurance Certificates on file with City with appropriate additional insured's listed. 8. If final plat not recorded, indemnification letter from Developer acknowledging that they are proceeding at their own risk. 9. Pre-Construction Conference with City G:\Public\Yorkville\Standard Notes, Forms and Checklists\Earthwork Requirements.doc HRGreen Storm Sewer Design Report Latest Revision: August 22, 2013 %IJ JkKVx j..,,"LE, i CHRISTIAN - HIGH SC Ca(DL YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Prepared for: John & Michelle Stewart 3874 N. IL Route 71 Sheridan, IL 60551 Phone: 815-695-5667 HRG Job: 88130135 Prepared by: Kenneth Gomez, E.I. Staff Engineer David W. Schultz, P.E., LEED AP BD+C Project Manager INDEX DESIGN NOTES TAB 1 • Project Location Map • Existing and Previous Conditions • Proposed Conditions DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS/EXHIBITS TAB 2 • Rational Method "C" Calculation — Proposed • Proposed Rational C Calculation Map • Rainfall Intensity • Storm Sewer IDF Curves • Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) • Inlet Capacities per IDOT Design Manual o R-2502-D o R-3015-R o R-3286-8V o R-4340-B • Overall Storm Sewer Pipe Layout Plan View • Hydraflow Storm Sewer Output — 10 YR • Storm Sewer Tabulation EXHIBITS TAB 3 • Previous Conditions - Phase 2 Drainage Exhibit • Proposed Drainage Exhibit • Copies from Smith Engineering Consultants Drainage Report & Storm Sizing — Prestwick of Yorkville Phase 2 (Reference) • Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report (Reference) TAB 1 DESIGN NOTES ya r. -9 12-J 1 .. U1ddQ S1J6 ti J !d+" �tld:N _S iJ Northern t d* A9 gti� FIELD OF _ fr:, +FBI CDt{791Y .+3"3.7'4'` Northern Trust Trust No � :.rte "rr • 1 NO.Is Ofd "If PIP ti S IS18ad + 13 Co..Trust Aln. ys6so f - �&rtk rrtJSr1 r ' q !s; 36970 - i=+ve tr., i o 88.x+5 ^rte " L.90 26 L L-C. 76.09 i rrw hn __ ca wo008 T3+1. 3 7 I �tsrumso r c .+ac , » 1 23€. ---., 132.86 a rr r ctdsc`orirtckne L t G 1Vat'r,Bank W �M SOIL X92 p )I , _ G 7rg6 � } TI/ - Block MaI) r a Project0� 153.25 t, 7 t.2s } +s at.s 57,1 r2 I —_-- locations •,_ l $ 6r,1 far r , Is ( 3 �+�� 1 n 118m `�� Ma ry C. r rllsl$ Fl�inp i_ REST l s� _ a . J` a r BIockTTlust avings Blink Stev"al! �SFR4 -+rte r J Creek r9.t-4 ra+arr J Partners -r$ f 127.34 vPrwerm 1 ;' L.L.C. Fivrence ' . 2d_K�oAi +1 Yst+ 77.53 BAock Trust 142.75 tn$,' 1 '► 737.2!5 8 occk Ce H. BIOCkR 57.98 5a W(sermn-Hughes mw Maria George t=. HIL U1 PoWnger ErrlefiDnses,lrIc. Richards Ltd. l ADO.81 1 t'�.wow FFeirrns, Z.L.G. 59.96 94,21 Par? erftp 94.0.3 231.88 t .1T 9 HtLL sass sue 33.8_ ! tyi 4 c L ' X22.05 Florence Aril 40— li bath -F;V—,, L, U - _ — 19P.95 �9lark �co g arr Ft+nns Afar)Nashner Trust 7'ras �? S-7,88 1 Trust S f, sus t3 1211 � 1�'B.3 f99SY UEL J. 4j F Y 6 f6 IJ B.R IIt.C. y Conifer Group, GtydA Gaw,I George E. Blo& "� Jarrras —"" r — t rtners rja. Tn,st RodbeFf& r ?° 295.1 PaWria .Gl Ei M.&Mary V. 36.16 `^ ,r,F' t y 5 160 4 Kuha 152 7 p ' r' �yy* on . � 'a c A C 7 tCS Uhose Gerald Lois StEWrt Fafs, 76.75 65.3 Burkhart Anreni Robert E. L'1 C' -7urtlo NGISOt. Tr pt al 144.13' 185.89 9 157' 139.22 a ,,,rG 2 1 Gf1 _ a- -12 1�- '+ x"97 AeU '�, ''� m Anrrcrre M - ? Meadow Creak Hags Famrds, DESIGN NOTES EXISTING AND PREVIOUS CONDITIONS: • Property location is the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. • The subject property consists of approximately a total of+/- 193.8 acres of which 31.6 acres (Lots formerly known as #273—#356) is being disturbed for the proposed location of a private school. The project site is located south of Phase 1 on what was previously known as the Prestwick of Yorkville Phase 2 subdivision which is generally located south of IL Route 126 and west of Ashley Road in the United City of Yorkville. The overall land area remains the same with a change in land us from residential to a school lot covering 84 lots, and former Right-of-Way including sidewalk and roadway. • Storm water management and runoff for Lots 273 through 356 along with former Right-of-Way have been previously accounted for in the original development of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision; please refer to the drainage report prepared by Smith Engineering Consultants, dated April 16, 2007 that was previously approved, reference sheets from that report are contained within this report as reference. The proposed tributary area for the proposed area is being tied directly into the existing storm sewer that was previously approved and extended from the storm water management basins, "Basin 2" and "Basin 313" of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision. • The storm sewer system downstream of Lot 273 through Lot 356 was previously designed by Smith Engineering Consultants to accept the flow from the developed site. As seen on Worksheet 2 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report, Basins 2 and 3B were designed and sized for approximately +/- 65 acres with curve numbers 74 and 73 respectively which is consistent with the areas summarized in the Rational Method "C" Calculation that broke down the two different land uses and compared the impervious areas in the ultimate design. The proposed school site will be phased over time and the entire lot is to be consistent with what was previously accounted for and should be allowed up to approximately +/- 13.3 acres (579,000 sq.ft.) of impervious development on the school site, Lot 1. • At the date of this report, Phase I and portions of Phase 2 stormwater management facilities for the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision have been fully constructed. Currently, there is a 10" drain tile at the downstream end of the Basin 3B restrictor structure (Tag CC) that drains to the west ditch of Ashley Road. This discharge eventually reaches an existing 24" CMP that passes flow to the east side of Ashley Road. The current land owner has since reconnected the existing 10" drain tile to the downstream field tile that had serviced the property historically so the low flow discharges are subsurface in the field tile system and overland flows still remain unchanged and tributary to the existing 24" CMP under Ashley Road. Proposed Conditions: • The proposed storm sewer for Lot 1 (Yorkville Christian School) has been designed on the basis of the ten (10) year storm and rainfall data found within the City of Yorkville watershed and Bulletin 70 data. • The onsite storm sewer has been designed utilizing the Hydraflow Storm Sewer for AutoCad 3D, 2011 which is based on the Rational Method. • Time of concentration was calculated for each of the proposed drainage areas. Time of concentration was assumed to be five (5) minutes for all smaller subareas with a time of concentrations less than 5 minutes which included any areas with buildings. • The proposed Rational C runoff coefficient for the school lot was summarized and compared to the previously designed land use area that contained single- family units and roadway section from the Prestwick of Yorkville Supplemental Report by Smith Engineering Consultants. Although using different methods, these numbers were converted to compare proposed C value of 0.69 to the existing curve number of 74. • Existing Sub-Basins H, L, and Q of Basins 2 and 3B for Prestwick of Yorkville Phase 2 will be used in the proposed stormwater management as the system was previously designed to accept the flow from their respective Sub-Basins in the Prestwick of Yorkville Drainage Report. • Due to the shift in the main access drive off of Ashley Road into the subdivision, the proposed location for stormwater Basin 3C will now be moved south on the opposite side of the main access drive and included in the future improvements because of poor existing soil conditions of where the previous roadway was aligned. Also at the current time the storm sewer has not been extended to Basin 3C as it currently stops at the restrictor manhole CC shown on page 75 of the phase 2 plans. Also while this area is to remain un-platted and as pre- existing conditions the storm sewer is to be extended and installed once future phase 2 plans are re-submitted for permit. • Proposed storm sewer structures are tributary to an existing storm sewer line that will connect to an existing downstream detention basin "Basin 3B" of the existing Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision. • DA-1 and DA-23 parking lot drain directly via curb cuts to the storm water management (SWM) Basin 2. DA-24 drains temporarily via a graded swale directly to SWM Basin 2, and in future development will drain via a proposed storm sewer system. • SWM Basin Q was previously designed in the Prestwick Subdivision to receive the flow from Sub-basins Q1 and Q2. Flows of Sub-Basins H41 B, H29A, H41, and H42 (pipe tag numbers 261, 259, 249, 247) in the previously designed Prestwick Subdivision were used for the proposed system in order to determine the downstream flow of Sub-Basin H42 (pipes 243 and 245) going to Basin 3B. Existing flows of Sub-Basins H7 and H11 (pipes 213 and 333B) were used to account for the flow from offsite and going to Sub-Basin H15 (pipe 217) that flows onsite onto DA-14. TAB 2 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS HRGreen RATIONAL METHOD"C"CALCULATION Project[#: 88130135 Project: Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 7/11/2013 Location: Yorkville,Illinois Checked DWS Date 7/11/2013 BASIN AREA AREA AREA %PAVED %GRASS RUNOFF AREA NO. (SQ-FT) PAVED GRASS 0.95 0.5 "C" (acres) PROPOSED YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SITE-OVERALL PHASE 1 278,289.2 209,851.2 68,438.0 75% 25% 0.84 6.39 PHASE2 112,491.1 78,071.2 34,419.9 69% 31% 0.81 2.58 FUTURE 986,055.0 286,448.2 699,606.8 29% 71% 0.63 22.64 PR-DA-AVERAGE 1,376,835.3 574,370.51 802,464.7 42% 58% 0.69 31.61 EXISTING SUBDIVISION-PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT-2(PHASE 2) PHASE 2 PRESTWICK 1,376,835.3 797,643.0 84 LOTS(LOT#273—LOT#356) 448,674.2 ROADWAY 98,322.5 SIDEWALK 32,195.6 EX-DA-AVERAGE 1,376,835.3 579,192.3 797,643.0 42% 58% 0.69 31.61 PROPOSED SQ.FT. AC. TOTAL AREA 1,376,835.3 31.61 Pervious Area 802,464.7 18.42 Impervious Area 574,370.5 13.19 %Impervious 41.7% EXISTING SQ.FT. AC. TOTAL AREA 1,376,835.3 31.61 Pervious Area 797,643.0 18.31 Impervious Area 579,192.3 13.30 %Impervious 42.1% HRGreen RATIONAL METHOD"C"CALCULATION ProjectT: 88130135 Project: Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 7/11/2013 Location: Yorkville,Illinois Checked DWS Date 8/21/2013 BASIN AREA AREA AREA %PAVED %GRASS RUNOFF AREA NO. (SQ-FT) PAVED GRASS 0.95 0.5 ..C., (acres) PROPOSED DA-1 96,190.3 58,337.4 37,852.9 61% 39% 0.77 2.21 DA-2 23,470.9 19,929.1 3,541.8 85% 15% 0.88 0.54 DA-3 30,653.8 20,439.1 10,214.7 67% 33% 0.80 0.70 DA-4 25,884.6 16,683.7 9,200.9 64% 36% 0.79 0.59 DA-5 14,556.7 13,313.1 1,243.6 91% 9% 0.91 0.33 DA-6 16,316.8 14,938.6 1,378.2 92% 8% 0.91 0.37 DA-7 9,268.1 8,904.9 363.2 96% 4% 0.93 0.21 DA-8 28,450.2 26,531.1 1,919.0 93% 7% 0.92 0.65 DA-9 14,557.8 14,229.2 328.5 98% 2% 0.94 0.33 DA-10 20,008.2 13,834.7 6,173.5 69% 31% 0.81 0.46 DA-11 15,823.7 9,712.7 6,111.0 61% 39% 0.78 0.36 DA-12 10,222.3 6,348.4 3,873.9 62% 38% 0.78 0.23 DA-13 7,555.6 6,245.0 1,310.6 83% 17% 0.87 0.17 DA-14 23,234.1 17,802.6 5,431.6 77% 23% 0.84 0.53 DA-15 17,806.1 11,324.9 6,481.2 64% 36% 0.79 0.41 DA-16 6,636.3 3,021.4 3,614.9 46% 54% 0.70 0.15 DA-17 17,593.4 3,763.7 13,829.7 21% 79% 0.60 0.40 DA-18 9,304.9 680.6 8,624.3 7% 93% 0.53 0.21 DA-19 9,246.1 9,246.1 0.0 100% 0% 0.95 0.21 DA-20 9,437.3 9,437.3 0.0 100% 0% 0.95 0.22 DA-21 2,770.1 2,770.1 0.0 100% 0% 0.95 0.06 DA-22 3,513.7 3,513.7 0.0 100% 0% 0.95 0.08 DA-23 46,838.5 40,013.8 6,824.7 85% 15% 0.88 1.08 DA-24 504,718.7 105,284.5 399,434.2 21% 79% 0.59 11.59 DA-25 372,127.8 112,076.5 260,051.2 30% 70% 0.64 8.54 DA-26 40,649.3 25,988.2 14,661.1 64% 36% 0.79 0.93 DA-AVERAGE 1,376,835 574,370 802,465 42% 58% 0.69 31.61 PROPOSED SQ.FT. AC. TOTALIAREA 1,376,835.3 31.61 PerviouslArea 802,464.9 18.42 ImperviouslArea 574,370.4 13.19 %Impervious 41.7% EXIST. � T1N1 K � , DETENTIO ' VB 1 ION _ —L BASIN P AS II U I N W Q / o / vo Ld 24110.8444 S FT I W - Q — EXIST. ' DETENTION &IC::D BASIN Z ' , Z AT IC LEGEND W 0 / _ U PHASE 1 FI \ S PHASE 2 PHASE 3 AL l I I 1 ,069.940 Q -- z 1 ,728.9548 SQ F a d 7,744.5581 SQ FT � 0 , M IIII 9949.7275 Sn I- EXIST �r r-`JT FLK D TENTION GE nr i I 111 � r-\ I I IJ Y +, 0 BASIN u 1 E-- FIR. F r- El Wo Pro in C \ ET C 133' 30792.4368 SQ FT Q I 11 3.9579 SQ T < I I 2722.7013 FT Q FU V RE _ 6685.8492 SQ FT \ ' 0 U PRES - — U ``� ° < Q UO \ Q ' I 678,195.0044 SQ FT (OVERALL) U U 1 � I SVBDI ISION I \ u 7 �5 , �' U cn PHASE 2 TOTAL = 636,177.2284 SQ FT (TOTAL PERVIOUS) 7 SQ \ I Q Q \ W Z \ 0 ' ATH J U U m (]If ol 0 a FI / J L w o Lu LL M i / j o p Lc)X / O D i 'i O / 300 . Q Y z > Z 16,386.0424 SQ FT _ Q p o I �" 0 o Q FT 0 0 0 00 > I o d. \ \ o \ a0 \ 0 BAR IS ONE INCH ON OFFICIAL DRAWINGS W FUTURE X o 1„ \� IF NOT ONE INCH, PARKING Q N . ADJUST SCALE ACCORDINGLY I O O O U \ / FIELDS DRAWN BY: DWS Q) APPROVED: DWS \ / \ JOB DATE: 2013 Qo I i o — — — 1 \ , NORTH JoB No: 88130135 DRAWING I - 0 20 40 80 V) 0 -- - FVTV RE STWIC { - FINAL - FOR REVIEW PR — DA N - SV BDIVIS PHAS 2 I NOT FOR ONSTRUCTION x \ , / Bulletin 70-Figure 14 Derived Rainfall Intensities(Yorkville) Duration 10 yr 25 yr 50 yr 100 yr (min) Rainfall Avg.I Rainfall Avg.I Rainfall Avg.I Rainfall Avg.1 5 0.58 6.91 0.70 8.35 0.82 9.79 0.98 11.81 6 0.66 6.62 0.80 8.00 0.94 9.38 1.13 11.32 7 0.75 6.42 0.90 7.76 1.06 9.09 1.28 10.96 8 0.84 6.26 1.01 7.57 1.18 8.87 1.43 10.70 9 0.92 6.14 1.11 7.42 1.31 8.70 1.57 10.50 10 1.01 6.05 1.22 7.31 1.43 8.57 1.72 10.33 11 1.07 5.81 1.29 7.02 1.51 8.23 1.82 9.93 12 1.12 5.62 1.36 6.79 1.59 7.96 1.92 9.59 13 1.18 5.45 1.43 6.59 1.67 7.72 2.02 9.31 14 1.24 5.31 1.50 6.41 1.75 7.52 2.12 9.07 15 1.30 5.18 1.57 6.26 1.84 7.34 2.21 8.86 16 1.33 4.98 1.60 6.02 1.88 7.06 2.27 8.51 17 1.36 4.80 1.64 5.80 1.93 6.80 2.32 8.20 18 1.39 4.64 1.68 5.61 1.97 6.57 2.38 7.93 19 1.42 4.50 1.72 5.43 2.02 6.37 2.43 7.68 20 1.46 4.37 1.76 5.28 2.06 6.19 2.49 7.46 21 1.49 4.25 1.80 5.14 2.11 6.02 2.54 7.26 22 1.52 4.15 1.84 5.01 2.15 5.87 2.60 7.08 23 1.55 4.05 1.88 4.89 2.20 5.74 2.65 6.92 24 1.58 3.96 1.91 4.79 2.24 5.61 2.71 6.77 25 1.62 3.88 1.95 4.69 2.29 5.49 2.76 6.63 26 1.65 3.80 1.99 4.60 2.33 5.39 2.82 6.50 27 1.68 3.73 2.03 4.51 2.38 5.29 2.87 6.38 28 1.71 3.67 2.07 4.43 2.43 5.20 2.92 6.27 29 1.74 3.61 2.11 4.36 2.47 5.11 2.98 6.16 30 1.78 3.55 2.15 4.29 2.52 5.03 3.03 6.07 31 1.80 3.47 2.17 4.20 2.54 4.92 3.07 5.94 32 1.81 3.40 2.19 4.11 2.57 4.82 3.10 5.81 33 1.83 3.33 2.22 4.03 2.60 4.72 3.13 5.70 34 1.85 3.27 2.24 3.95 2.62 4.63 3.17 5.59 35 1.87 3.21 2.26 3.88 2.65 4.55 3.20 5.48 36 1.89 3.15 2.29 3.81 2.68 4.47 3.23 5.38 37 1.91 3.10 2.31 3.74 2.71 4.39 3.26 5.29 38 1.93 3.05 2.33 3.68 2.73 4.32 3.30 5.20 39 1.95 3.00 2.35 3.62 2.76 4.25 3.33 5.12 40 1.97 2.95 2.38 3.57 2.79 4.18 3.36 5.04 41 1.99 2.91 2.40 3.51 2.82 4.12 3.39 4.97 42 2.01 2.87 2.42 3.46 2.84 4.06 3.43 4.90 43 2.03 2.83 2.45 3.42 2.87 4.00 3.46 4.83 44 2.04 2.79 2.47 3.37 2.90 3.95 3.49 4.76 45 2.06 2.75 2.49 3.33 2.92 3.90 3.53 4.70 50 2.16 2.59 2.61 3.13 3.06 3.67 3.69 4.43 60 2.26 2.26 2.73 2.73 3.20 3.20 3.85 3.85 (hours) 1 2.26 2.26 2.73 2.73 3.20 3.20 3.85 3.85 2 2.78 1.39 3.36 1.68 3.94 1.97 4.76 2.38 3 3.07 1.02 3.71 1.24 4.35 1.45 5.25 1.75 6 3.60 0.60 4.35 0.73 5.10 0.85 6.15 1.03 12 4.18 0.35 5.05 0.42 5.92 0.49 7.13 0.59 18 4.51 0.25 5.45 0.30 6.39 0.36 7.71 0.43 24 4.8 0.20 5.8 0.24 6.8 0.28 8.2 0.34 Bulletin 70,Figure 14-YORKVILLE Intensity vs.Duration 14.00 12.00 10.00 z c 8.00 .T c 6.00 N C 4.00 - 2.00 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Duration(minutes) Storm Sewer OF Curves OF file: Yorkville.IDF Int. (in/hr) 14.00 14.00 100-Yr 12.00 12.00 o0-Yr 10.00 10.00 25-Yr 8.00 8.00 10-Yr 6.00 &00 5-Yr 4.00 4.00 3-Yr 2.00 2.00 2-Yr 0.00 0.00 1-Yr 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Time (min) Storm Sewers Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 1 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.016 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.27 = 0.27 16.38971 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 106 316 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.015 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 2.49 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.01 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.28 17.09931 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 2 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.054 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.17 = 0.17 10.07539 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 185 9.Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.017 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 0.00 2.10 11. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 0.02 = 0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.19 11.54107 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 3 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.096 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.13 = 0.13 8.004068 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 151 68 9.Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.0286 0.055 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 3.44 3.78 11. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.01 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.15 9.03564 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 4 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.33 = 0.33 19.77968 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 281 0 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.0345 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 3.78 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.02 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.35 21.02004 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 5 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 100 0 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.011 0.01 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.03 + 0.00 = 0.03 1.578954 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 95 0 9.Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.004 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 1.29 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.02 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.05 2.81048 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 6 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 100 0 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.037 0.01 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.02 + 0.00 = 0.02 0.971955 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 130 0 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.037 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 3.91 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.01 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.03 1.52606 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 7 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 29 0 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.015 0.01 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.01 + 0.00 = 0.01 0.518094 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 95 0 9.Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.015 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 2.49 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.01 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.02 1.154051 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 8 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 0 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 0 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 284 0 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.034 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 3.75 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.02 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.02 1.262783 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 9 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 100 0 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.011 0.01 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.03 + 0.00 = 0.03 1.578954 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 18 0 9.Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.0033 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 1.17 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.00 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.03 1.835855 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 10 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.007 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.38 = 0.38 22.81288 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 0 116 9.Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0 0.007 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 0.00 1.35 11. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 0.02 = 0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.40 24.24507 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 11 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 32 68 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.035 0.035 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.01 + 0.15 = 0.15 9.201772 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 295 0 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.03 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 3.52 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.02 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.18 10.59818 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 12 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 12 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.06 = 0.06 3.62714 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 164 0 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.006 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 1.57 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.03 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.09 5.363013 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 13 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 8 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.015 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.04 = 0.04 2.229743 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 165 0 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.015 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 2.49 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.02 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.06 3.3343 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 14 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 0 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 0 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 364 0 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.026 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 3.28 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.03 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.03 1.850821 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 15 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 0 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 0 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 286 0 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.033 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 3.69 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.02 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.02 1.2908 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 16 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 21 79 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.052 0.052 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.14 = 0.15 8.714095 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 41 0 9.Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.067 0 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 5.26 0.00 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.00 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.15 8.843961 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 17 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.036 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.20 = 0.20 11.84945 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 85 119 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.036 0.036 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 3.86 3.06 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.01 + 0.01 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.21 12.86462 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 18 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.064 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.16 = 0.16 9.413417 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 0 35 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0 0.027 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 0.00 2.65 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.00 + 0.00 = 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.16 9.633446 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 23 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.087 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.14 = 0.14 8.325524 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 373 13 9.Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.015 0.087 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 2.49 4.76 11. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.04 + 0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.18 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 24 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.0039 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.48 = 0.48 28.8266 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 0 1242 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0 0.0039 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 0.00 1.01 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.00 + 0.34 = 0.34 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.82 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 25 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.011 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.32 = 0.32 19.03979 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 61 568 9.Watercourse slope,s ft/ft 0.0074 0.031 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 1.75 2.84 11. Tt=L/3600V hr 0.01 + 0.06 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.38 22.95361 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 8/21/2013 Location DA 26 Checked DWS Date Circle one: Present Developed Circle one: Tc Tt through subarea NOTES: Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic,or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow(Applicable to Tc only Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1) P U 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1) 0.011 0.24 3. Flow Length, L(total L not>100 ft) ft 0 100 4.Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 in 3.04 2.9 5. Land Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.029 6.Tt= (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*SAO.4) hr 0.00 + 0.22 = 0.22 12.91993 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P"or unpaved,"U") P U U or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 9 140 9.Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.018 0.018 10.Average velocity V(figure 3-1) ft/s 2.73 2.16 11. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^2 0 0 13.Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft 0 0 15. Channel Slope,s ft/ft 0.01 0.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.035 0.035 17.V=(1.49*rA(2/3)*s"(1/2))/n ft/s 0.00 0.00 18. Flow length, L ft 0 0 19. Tt= L/3600V hr 0.00 + 20.Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt(add Tt in steps 6, 11,and 19) hr 0.23 Table 3.1-Roughness coefficients(Manning's n)for sheet flow Smoth surfaces(concrete,asphale,gravel,or bare soil 0.011 Fallow(no residue) 0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover<20% 0.06 Residue cover>20% 0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie 0.15 Dense Grasses(blue grass,native grass mixtures) 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range(natural) 0.13 Woods: Light underbrush 0.40 Dense underbrush 0.80 Note:when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-2502 TY D Grate 0.9 = Free open area of grate(sq.ft.) 6 =Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) H RG reen ----Capacity Calculation----- Weir Orifice Net Weir/Orifice Flow Type Ponding Equation Equation Capacity ratio 0.05 0.20 0.97 0.20 0.21 Weir Flow 0.10 0.57 1.37 0.57 0.42 Weir Flow 0.15 1.05 1.68 1.05 0.62 Weir Flow 0.17 1.26 1.79 1.22 0.71 Transition Flow 0.20 1.61 1.94 1.42 0.83 Transition Flow 0.25 2.25 2.17 1.77 1.04 Transition Flow 0.30 2.96 2.37 2.13 1.25 Transition Flow 0.35 3.73 2.56 2.52 1.45 Transition Flow 0.40 4.55 2.74 2.74 1.66 Orifice Flow 0.45 5.43 2.91 2.91 1.87 Orifice Flow 0.50 6.36 3.06 3.06 2.08 Orifice Flow 0.55 7.34 3.21 3.21 2.28 Orifice Flow 0.60 8.37 3.36 3.36 2.49 Orifice Flow 0.65 9.43 3.49 3.49 2.70 Orifice Flow 0.70 10.54 3.63 3.63 2.91 Orifice Flow 0.75 11.69 3.75 3.75 3.12 Orifice Flow 1.00 18.00 4.33 4.33 4.15 Orifice Flow 1.25 25.16 4.84 4.84 5.19 Orifice Flow 1.50 33.07 5.31 5.31 6.23 Orifice Flow 1.75 41.67 5.73 5.73 7.27 Orifice Flow 2.00 50.91 6.13 6.13 8.31 Orifice Flow 2.25 60.75 6.50 6.50 9.35 Orifice Flow 2.50 71.15 6.85 6.85 10.38 Orifice Flow 2.75 82.09 7.19 7.19 11.42 Orifice Flow 3.00 93.53 7.51 7.51 12.46 Orifice Flow 3.25 105.46 7.81 7.81 13.50 Orifice Flow 3.50 117.86 8.11 8.11 14.54 Orifice Flow 3.75 130.71 8.39 8.39 15.58 Orifice Flow 4.00 144.00 8.67 8.67 16.61 Orifice Flow 4.25 157.71 8.93 8.93 17.65 Orifice Flow 4.50 171.83 9.19 9.19 18.69 Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A=free open area of grate P=weir perimeter h=feet of head (ponding depth) g=32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80%of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-3015-R (City of Yorkville) 1.1 = Free open area of grate (sq.ft.) 4.6 =Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) H R G ree n ----Capacity Calculation----- Weir Orifice Net Weir/Orifice Flow Type Ponding Equation Equation Capacity ratio 0.05 0.15 1.18 0.15 0.13 Weir Flow 0.10 0.44 1.67 0.44 0.26 Weir Flow 0.15 0.80 2.05 0.80 0.39 Weir Flow 0.17 0.97 2.18 0.97 0.44 Weir Flow 0.20 1.23 2.37 1.23 0.52 Weir Flow 0.25 1.73 2.65 1.73 0.65 Weir Flow 0.30 2.27 2.90 2.07 0.78 Transition Flow 0.35 2.86 3.13 2.40 0.91 Transition Flow 0.40 3.49 3.35 2.74 1.04 Transition Flow 0.45 4.17 3.55 3.09 1.17 Transition Flow 0.50 4.88 3.75 3.45 1.30 Transition Flow 0.55 5.63 3.93 3.82 1.43 Transition Flow 0.60 6.41 4.10 4.10 1.56 Orifice Flow 0.65 7.23 4.27 4.27 1.69 Orifice Flow 0.70 8.08 4.43 4.43 1.82 Orifice Flow 0.75 8.96 4.59 4.59 1.95 Orifice Flow 0.85 10.81 4.88 4.88 2.21 Orifice Flow 1.00 13.80 5.30 5.30 2.61 Orifice Flow 1.25 19.29 5.92 5.92 3.26 Orifice Flow 1.50 25.35 6.49 6.49 3.91 Orifice Flow 1.75 31.95 7.01 7.01 4.56 Orifice Flow 2.00 39.03 7.49 7.49 5.21 Orifice Flow 2.25 46.58 7.94 7.94 5.86 Orifice Flow 2.50 54.55 8.37 8.37 6.51 Orifice Flow 2.75 62.93 8.78 8.78 7.17 Orifice Flow 3.00 71.71 9.17 9.17 7.82 Orifice Flow 3.25 80.85 9.55 9.55 8.47 Orifice Flow 3.50 90.36 9.91 9.91 9.12 Orifice Flow 3.75 100.21 10.26 10.26 9.77 Orifice Flow 4.00 110.40 10.59 10.59 10.42 Orifice Flow 4.25 120.91 10.92 10.92 11.07 Orifice Flow 4.50 131.73 11.24 11.24 11.72 Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A=free open area of grate P=weir perimeter h=feet of head (ponding depth) g=32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80%of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-3286-8V(City of Yorkville) 0.7 = Free open area of grate(sq.ft.) 4.4 =Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) H R G ree n ----Capacity Calculation----- Weir Orifice Net Weir/Orifice Flow Type Ponding Equation Equation Capacity ratio 0.05 0.15 0.75 0.15 0.20 Weir Flow 0.10 0.42 1.07 0.42 0.39 Weir Flow 0.15 0.77 1.31 0.77 0.59 Weir Flow 0.17 0.93 1.39 0.93 0.67 Weir Flow 0.20 1.18 1.51 1.08 0.78 Transition Flow 0.25 1.65 1.69 1.33 0.98 Transition Flow 0.30 2.17 1.85 1.61 1.17 Transition Flow 0.35 2.73 1.99 1.89 1.37 Transition Flow 0.40 3.34 2.13 2.13 1.57 Orifice Flow 0.45 3.98 2.26 2.26 1.76 Orifice Flow 0.50 4.67 2.38 2.38 1.96 Orifice Flow 0.55 5.38 2.50 2.50 2.15 Orifice Flow 0.60 6.13 2.61 2.61 2.35 Orifice Flow 0.65 6.92 2.72 2.72 2.55 Orifice Flow 0.70 7.73 2.82 2.82 2.74 Orifice Flow 0.75 8.57 2.92 2.92 2.94 Orifice Flow 0.85 10.34 3.11 3.11 3.33 Orifice Flow 1.00 13.20 3.37 3.37 3.92 Orifice Flow 1.25 18.45 3.77 3.77 4.90 Orifice Flow 1.50 24.25 4.13 4.13 5.87 Orifice Flow 1.75 30.56 4.46 4.46 6.85 Orifice Flow 2.00 37.34 4.77 4.77 7.83 Orifice Flow 2.25 44.55 5.06 5.06 8.81 Orifice Flow 2.50 52.18 5.33 5.33 9.79 Orifice Flow 2.75 60.20 5.59 5.59 10.77 Orifice Flow 3.00 68.59 5.84 5.84 11.75 Orifice Flow 3.25 77.34 6.08 6.08 12.73 Orifice Flow 3.50 86.43 6.31 6.31 13.71 Orifice Flow 3.75 95.86 6.53 6.53 14.69 Orifice Flow 4.00 105.60 6.74 6.74 15.67 Orifice Flow 4.25 115.65 6.95 6.95 16.64 Orifice Flow 4.50 126.01 7.15 7.15 17.62 Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A=free open area of grate P=weir perimeter h=feet of head (ponding depth) g=32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80%of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-4340-B 1.1 = Free open area of grate(sq.ft.) 6 =Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) H RG reen ----Capacity Calculation----- Weir Orifice Net Weir/Orifice Flow Type Ponding Equation Equation Capacity ratio 0.05 0.20 1.18 0.20 0.17 Weir Flow 0.10 0.57 1.67 0.57 0.34 Weir Flow 0.15 1.05 2.05 1.05 0.51 Weir Flow 0.17 1.26 2.18 1.26 0.58 Weir Flow 0.20 1.61 2.37 1.59 0.68 Transition Flow 0.25 2.25 2.65 1.96 0.85 Transition Flow 0.30 2.96 2.90 2.34 1.02 Transition Flow 0.35 3.73 3.13 2.74 1.19 Transition Flow 0.40 4.55 3.35 3.16 1.36 Transition Flow 0.45 5.43 3.55 3.55 1.53 Orifice Flow 0.50 6.36 3.75 3.75 1.70 Orifice Flow 0.55 7.34 3.93 3.93 1.87 Orifice Flow 0.60 8.37 4.10 4.10 2.04 Orifice Flow 0.65 9.43 4.27 4.27 2.21 Orifice Flow 0.70 10.54 4.43 4.43 2.38 Orifice Flow 0.75 11.69 4.59 4.59 2.55 Orifice Flow 1.00 18.00 5.30 5.30 3.40 Orifice Flow 1.25 25.16 5.92 5.92 4.25 Orifice Flow 1.50 33.07 6.49 6.49 5.10 Orifice Flow 1.75 41.67 7.01 7.01 5.95 Orifice Flow 2.00 50.91 7.49 7.49 6.80 Orifice Flow 2.25 60.75 7.94 7.94 7.65 Orifice Flow 2.50 71.15 8.37 8.37 8.50 Orifice Flow 2.75 82.09 8.78 8.78 9.35 Orifice Flow 3.00 93.53 9.17 9.17 10.20 Orifice Flow 3.25 105.46 9.55 9.55 11.05 Orifice Flow 3.50 117.86 9.91 9.91 11.89 Orifice Flow 3.75 130.71 10.26 10.26 12.74 Orifice Flow 4.00 144.00 10.59 10.59 13.59 Orifice Flow 4.25 157.71 10.92 10.92 14.44 Orifice Flow 4.50 171.83 11.24 11.24 15.29 Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A=free open area of grate P=weir perimeter h=feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80%of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension for AutoCAD® Civil 3D® 2013 Plan Outfal[ 6 18 1 7 5 22 17 23 8 4 3 13 9 20 14 10 21 15 19 6 11 12 Project File: 88130135_4.stm Number of lines:23 Date:8/21/2013 Storm Sewers 00.00 Storm Sewer Tabulation Pagel Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C TG Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd/Rim Elev Line ID coeff (1) flow full Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope Dn Up Dn Up Dn Up Line (ft) (ac) (ac) (C) (min) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (in) M (ft) (ft) (fit) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 End 158.000 0.01 15.66 0.01 0.00 10.51 5.0 24.4 4.1 69.24 72.55 8.59 42 0.44 697.00 697.70 699.74 700.43 700.96 709.25 245 2 1 69.000 0.46 15.63 0.76 0.35 10.51 24.2 24.2 4.1 63.02 92.78 9.49 42 0.72 701.66 702.10 703.72 704.59 709.25 709.00 243 3 2 59.000 0.33 15.15 0.90 0.30 10.16 5.0 23.8 4.2 59.93 89.74 8.50 42 0.68 702.20 702.60 704.59 705.02 709.00 708.96 100 4 3 151.000 0.37 13.88 0.90 0.33 9.05 5.0 23.4 4.2 55.66 84.15 7.33 42 0.60 702.16 703.06 705.02 705.33 708.96 708.90 102 5 4 184.000 0.40 1.49 0.48 0.19 1.01 12.9 12.9 5.5 5.56 12.63 7.75 15 3.26 705.00 711.00 705.58 711.95 708.90 716.42 200 6 5 64.000 0.15 1.09 0.62 0.09 0.82 8.8 8.8 6.2 5.12 8.74 6.36 15 1.56 711.50 712.50 712.19 713.42 716.42 717.64 202 7 6 92.000 0.41 0.94 0.73 0.30 0.73 5.0 5.2 7.1 5.15 7.29 4.82 15 1.09 712.25 713.25 713.42 714.17 717.64 718.24 204 8 7 56.000 0.53 0.53 0.81 0.43 0.43 5.0 5.0 7.1 3.06 3.65 5.03 12 0.89 713.50 714.00 714.20 714.75 718.24 718.24 206 9 3 43.000 0.21 0.94 0.93 0.20 0.82 5.0 6.5 6.8 5.52 6.75 5.82 15 0.93 704.76 705.10 705.56 706.05 708.96 709.15 300 10 9 60.000 0.33 0.73 0.94 0.31 0.62 5.0 6.2 6.8 4.24 4.95 4.47 15 0.50 705.20 705.50 706.12 706.39 709.15 709.40 302 11 10 76.000 0.23 0.40 0.72 0.17 0.31 5.0 5.7 6.9 2.15 2.80 3.80 12 0.53 705.76 706.10 706.43 706.73 709.40 709.72 304 12 11 56.000 0.17 0.17 0.85 0.14 0.14 5.0 5.0 7.1 1.03 2.31 1.82 12 0.36 706.00 706.20 706.77 706.81 709.72 709.72 306 13 4 57.000 0.65 10.73 0.91 0.59 6.74 5.0 23.2 4.2 46.04 60.53 8.84 36 0.70 704.00 704.40 705.96 706.61 708.90 709.07 104 14 13 52.000 0.65 10.08 0.91 0.59 6.15 5.0 23.1 4.2 43.62 54.88 7.76 36 0.58 704.36 704.66 706.61 706.75 709.07 709.84 106 15 14 25.000 0.36 0.89 0.72 0.26 0.69 10.6 10.6 5.9 4.05 6.26 4.84 15 0.80 705.95 706.15 706.75 706.96 709.84 710.01 110 16 15 56.000 0.53 0.53 0.81 0.43 0.43 5.0 5.0 7.1 3.06 4.61 5.57 12 1.43 706.46 707.26 707.00 707.95 710.01 710.02 112 17 4 59.000 0.59 1.29 0.74 0.44 0.96 21.0 21.0 4.4 4.27 6.44 5.25 15 0.85 704.75 705.25 705.49 706.09 708.90 708.83 114 18 17 60.000 0.70 0.70 0.75 0.53 0.53 9.0 9.0 6.2 3.25 3.86 5.25 12 1.00 705.56 706.10 706.20 706.87 708.83 710.28 116 19 14 85.000 8.54 8.54 0.57 4.87 4.87 22.9 22.9 4.3 38.29 40.32 9.03 30 0.82 704.80 705.50 706.75 707.59 709.84 710.60 108 20 2 49.000 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.3 7.1 2.00 5.51 4.11 12 2.04 704.00 705.00 704.59 705.60 709.00 708.91 259 21 20 27.000 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.11 2.35 1.58 12 0.37 704.90 705.00 705.79 705.80 708.91 708.53 261 22 1 20.000 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.3 7.1 6.39 8.57 6.81 15 1.50 703.60 703.90 704.40 704.92 709.25 708.50 247 Project File: 88130135_4.stm Number of lines:23 Run Date: 8/21/2013 NOTES:Intensity=168.94/(Inlet time+20.60)^0.98; Return period=Yrs. 10 ; c=cir e=ellip b=box Storm Sewers 00.00 Storm Sewer Tabulation Page Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C TG Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd/Rim Elev Line ID coeff (1) flow full Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope Dn Up Dn Up Dn Up Line (ft) (ac) (ac) (C) (min) (min) (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (ft/s) (in) M (ft) (ft) (fit) (ft) (ft) (ft) 23 22 26.000 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.05 4.34 1.90 15 0.38 704.00 704.10 705.07 705.09 708.50 708.50 249 Project File: 88130135_4.stm Number of lines:23 Run Date: 8/21/2013 NOTES:Intensity=168.94/(Inlet time+20.60)^0.98; Return period=Yrs. 10 ; c=cir e=ellip b=box Storm Sewers 00.00 Hydraulic Grade Line Computations Page Line Size Q Downstream Len Upstream Check JL Minor coeff loss Invert I HGL Depth Area Vel Vel EGL Sf Invert I HGL Depth Area Vel Vel EGL Sf Ave Enrgy elev elev head elev elev elev head elev Sf loss (in) (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (sgft) (ft/s) (ft) (ft) N (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (sgft) (ft/s) (ft) (ft) N N (ft) (K) (ft) 1 42 69.24 697.00 699.74 2.74 8.07 8.58 1.15 700.88 0.443 158.00 697.70 700.43 2.73 8.06 8.59 1.15 701.58 0.444 0.444 0.701 0.60 0.69 2 42 63.02 701.60 703.72 2.12* 6.08 10.37 1.16 704.87 0.000 69.000 702.10 704.59 2.49** 7.31 8.62 1.16 705.74 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.97 1.12 3 42 59.93 702.20 704.59 2.39 6.99 8.58 1.11 705.69 0.000 59.000 702.60 705.02 2.42** 7.11 8.43 1.11 706.13 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.99 n/a 4 42 55.66 702.10 705.02 2.92 6.82 6.48 1.04 706.06 0.000 151.00 703.00 705.33 2.33** 6.82 8.17 1.04 706.37 0.000 0.000 n/a 1.00 1.04 5 15 5.56 705.00 705.58 0.58* 0.56 9.96 0.48 706.06 0.000 184.00 711.00 711.95 0.95** 1.01 5.53 0.48 712.43 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.91 n/a 6 15 5.12 711.50 712.19 0.69* 0.69 7.40 0.44 712.63 0.000 64.000 712.50 713.42 0.92** 0.96 5.31 0.44 713.86 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.15 0.07 7 15 5.15 712.25 713.42 1.17 0.97 4.32 0.44 713.86 0.000 92.000 713.25 714.17 j 0.92** 0.97 5.32 0.44 714.61 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.46 n/a 8 12 3.06 713.50 714.20 0.70* 0.59 5.20 037 714.57 0.000 56.000 714.00 714.75 0.75** 0.63 4.85 0.37 715.12 0.000 0.000 n/a 1.00 n/a 9 15 5.52 704.70 705.56 0.86* 0.90 6.13 0.47 706.03 0.000 43.000 705.10 706.05 0.95** 1.00 5.51 0.47 706.52 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.15 n/a 10 15 4.24 705.20 706.12 0.92 0.97 4.37 0.30 706.42 0.460 60.000 705.50 706.39 0.89 0.93 4.56 0.32 706.71 0.508 0.484 0.290 0.15 0.05 11 12 2.15 705.70 706.43 0.73 0.52 3.49 0.19 706.62 0.395 76.000 706.10 706.73 0.63** 0.53 4.10 0.26 707.00 0.586 0.491 0.373 0.15 0.04 12 12 1.03 706.00 706.77 0.77 0.65 1.58 0.04 706.81 0.080 56.000 706.20 706.81 0.61 0.50 2.05 0.07 706.88 0.150 0.115 0.065 1.00 0.07 13 36 46.04 704.00 705.96 1.96* 4.89 9.42 1.06 707.02 0.000 57.000 704.40 706.61 2.21** 5.58 8.26 1.06 707.67 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.15 0.16 14 36 43.62 704.30 706.61 2.31 5.42 7.48 1.01 707.61 0.000 52.000 704.60 706.75 2.15** 5.42 8.05 1.01 707.76 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.76 0.77 15 15 4.05 705.95 706.75 0.80 0.83 4.88 0.36 707.11 0.000 25.000 706.15 706.96 0.81** 0.85 4.79 0.36 707.32 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.76 n/a 16 12 3.06 706.40 707.00 0.60* 0.49 6.28 0.37 707.36 0.000 56.000 707.20 707.95 0.75** 0.63 4.85 0.37 708.32 0.000 0.000 n/a 1.00 n/a 17 15 4.27 704.75 705.49 0.74* 0.76 5.61 0.37 705.87 0.000 59.000 705.25 706.09 0.84** 0.87 4.89 0.37 706.46 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.24 0.09 18 12 3.25 705.50 706.20 0.70* 0.59 5.50 0.39 706.59 0.000 60.000 706.10 706.87 0.77** 0.65 5.00 0.39 707.26 0.000 0.000 n/a 1.00 0.39 19 30 38.29 704.80 706.75 1.95 4.11 9.32 1.19 707.94 0.000 85.000 705.50 707.59 2.09** 4.38 8.74 1.19 708.78 0.000 0.000 n/a 1.00 n/a 20 12 2.00 704.00 704.59 0.59 0.48 4.18 0.25 704.84 0.000 49.000 705.00 705.60 0.60** 0.50 4.04 0.25 705.86 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.72 0.18 21 12 1.11 704.90 705.79 0.89 0.74 1.51 0.04 705.82 0.074 27.000 705.00 705.80 0.80 0.67 1.65 0.04 705.84 0.086 0.080 0.022 1.00 0.04 22 15 6.39 703.60 704.40 0.80* 0.84 7.65 0.55 704.96 0.000 20.000 703.90 704.92 1.02** 1.07 5.97 0.55 705.47 0.000 0.000 n/a 0.28 0.16 Project File: 88130135_4.stm Number of lines:23 Run Date: 8/21/2013 Notes:* depth assumed.;**Critical depth.;j-Line contains hyd.jump. ; c=cir e=ellip b=box Storm Sewers 00.00 Hydraulic Grade Line Computations Page Line Size Q Downstream Len Upstream Check JL Minor coeff loss Invert I HGL Depth Area Vel Vel EGL Sf Invert I HGL Depth Area Vel Vel EGL Sf Ave Enrgy elev elev head elev elev elev head elev Sf loss (in) (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (sgft) (ft/s) (ft) (ft) N (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (sgft) (ft/s) (ft) (ft) N N (ft) (K) (ft) 23 15 2.05 704.00 705.07 1.07 1.12 1.83 0.05 705.13 0.080 26.000 704.10 705.09 0.99 1.04 1.97 0.06 705.15 0.092 0.086 0.022 1.00 0.06' Project File: 88130135_4.stm Number of lines:23 Run Date: 8/21/2013 Notes:* depth assumed.;**Critical depth.;j-Line contains hyd.jump. ; c=cir e=ellip b=box Storm Sewers v10.00 Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: 88130135_3.stm Rl J Cl 1 Cl J Q J []'S Q s C} a e AA SM F-W �?rRM ! � �!Cd0 WO � =on Iq Q I► CO CaAr q HRH.C4 p Wri C4 A 90!7<F u ��It CO CM 4 �C3 *mow ,�- www n �ww Www v F"ww Wwuu w�� wW !� r Ec� Ec� Ec-�; 'M � c Ec� _M E� 727.00 727.00 720.00 720.00 713.00 713.00 706.00 -- — 706.00 -30"@ 0.82% 699.00 ° 699.00 57. OOU-36"A 0.70% 0 692.00 692.00 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 HGL EGL Reach (ft) Storm Sewers Storm Sewer Profile Proj. file: 88130135_3.stm (} J q� J J J J J J J gn"n C7Q NF-W 21—CM CPr CIQ C3 to 19" �!C1n �C? C!q C7 Q q ErfAAAI p �R'!� q �r- q �CMm q �Mcn A Q ti. q qR� q A � CO Q Elev. (ft) w ° '91Q �i a� n�M �� CO w-n.M R F.i• I;w Www A Www ;, MUM � www +0 Www +, Www www *� "'� F s J Fay 9» 9sa E�9 Esa !9 f=�� 9 Eye 9 E� GgC75 @R d'rs WEE pp �cc �cE fO � c �cc G� tr cE We 736.00 736.00 727.00 727.00 718.00 718.00 709.00 709.00 Er,7751 "@ 0.89% 0 0 700.00 700.00 151.UUULt-42 (a) 0 0 691.00 T 1 691.00 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 HGL EGL Reach (ft) Storm Sewers TAB 3 EXHIBITS :: �, ��y�,ryr ,� 0111111111 M / c ` a _ iii �"'��,�� • " � 4 ,� ,� ��t:�.� � la A Ell 11111111 , ,�! II� 8 -: 1 ���.�zrrnnr►i;� r LOT 79 �r4> 53 LOT / / � \ �--- r-- \ � LOT 106 S.W.M. (WET) ti LOT 73 BASIN 3A f LOT 67 HWL =703.20 1 LOT b7 NWL =699.50 / LOT 72 f I LOT t6 �56 LOT 54 LOT 7/ 707 \ \ LOT 68 \ I LOT 55 r LOT 70 LOT l08- \ ` � \ � � � •-� a moo? I 0-_ LOT 69 LOT 65 \ cos I m LOT 56 .� N PREVIOUS DRAINAGE AREA o / l SUB BASIN AREA 38 z \~ - PREVIOUS DRAINAGE AREA/ \ ! .[br Ell f — = SUB-BASIN AREA LOT 58 LOT 64 a0 X00 I }cn S.W.M. (WET) v– LOT 59 \ BASIN 2 e W / HWL =710.80 LOT 1/0 * \ NWL =707.00 ' 1 7 LOT 60 LOT 6l /1 LOT 62, 1 . o LOT 245 P I S/ DRAINAGE AREA ^ ° SUB-BASIN AREA 2 m ' - o LOT 1/I I LOT 244 _ ` N I.000, l LOT 112 LOT 272 V 1 11 71�70s 709 — / — DA-1I 97521.6 V LOT 113 f A-23 SF J � r LOT 271 46726.7 b S.W.M. (W o -_— BASIN 3 I tI ,WL =701. / LOT 270 e DA—BLDG NORT 1 LOT 114 l`�WL =697. r 9246. SF \ (DA 19) LOT 246 ! � DA-BLOG N2 LOT 269 . DA-24 —_ 27D70.21SF DA--BLDG .... ` T DA—BLDG S2 SO TH 1 I y LOT 247 Ely 3513.7 SF 943 .3 SF s �_= LOT 115 -� (DA-22) (D 20) 3470:9 9304E _ \ 9 9 1 LOT 268 S \J LOT 248 LOT 116 \ � i l T 238 LOT 267 34. I 178 .1 j LOT 249 ` SF DA 16 LOT 117 S 66 6.3 _ / i F / 2 884 SF LOT 266 DA- DA-5 �� / LOT //8 LOT 250 S� 6316.8 6.7 �> I I 0 I � T 237 LOT 265 DA-8 / LOT 119 O �— �l � 8450.2 �'� I I 0 � Q LOT 251 F A = Q w OT 236 z.. � D U) W 1582 1 _ . I 1582 Q W 0 LOT 264 F I LOT 120 LOT 252 > / / 5 I (n _j z � I � 1 Of w < DA-1 Of OT 235 a /' 20-a08. I I U U Q SF L 63 � O i I _j O f / i LO 121 I bi 0 LOT 253 \\`\ Ld 724 u .2 SF DA- I I °� L 0 I 22.3 S I Y Z > a_ LOT 234 o LOT 2L w LOT 25� � O _ / \\ % - LO 1 1122 DA-26 —)1 R S DRAINAGE AR � 40649.3 0000, SUB-BASIN AREA., SF I BAR IS ONE INCH ON LOT 233 I \ I I OFFICIAL DRAWINGS 0 1 LOT 26i %� I Lor2 _ I IF NOT ONE INCH, ADJUST SCALE ACCORDINGLY LOT 232 I / / \ i Crz --__ I I DRAWN BY: DWS�kk ---- I I APPROVED: DWS LOT 260 / �. L0�256 JOB DATE: 201 3 I I I � 00 _ � i ^-- / � LOT l23 ^-- �1 JOB NO: 88130135 / \ I DRAWING LOT 231 I `�' \� \ � LOT 155 I T !24 I S � � \ LOT l56 I I LOT 14<� LO 0 10 20 40 1 \ \ LOT 259 � � LOT l39 I / I � PR-DA L 7–j 7Qr \ � LOT 1 � LOT l57 LOT 125� I I I LOT 258 \ � n STORM SEWER COMPUTATION SHEET BASIN H PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE-Phase 2 COMPUTED BY: GEK DATE: 5/25/2006 JOB NO: YKFD-030269.04-03 CHECKED BY: DWS UPDATED: 8/21/2007 DRAINAGE AREA RUNOFF FLOW TIME RAINFALL TOTAL INLET BYPASS PIPE CAPACITY VELOCITY (FT/SEC) INVERT ELEVATION PIPE BASIN PIPE LENGTH (ACRES) COEFF. "A"x "C" (MINUTE) INTENSITY RUNOFF CAPACITY FLOW DIAMETER FULL FLOWING DESIGN UPPER LOWER SLOPE TAG# (FEET) INCREMENT TOTAL nCu INCREMENT TOTAL TO UPPER END IN SECTION (INCH/HOUR) (CFS) (CFS) (INCHES) (CFS) FULL FLOW END END FT/FT Hl 201 27 0.51 0.51 0.71 0.36 0.36 10.90 0.17 5.89 1.05 1.05 1.09 12 2.17 2.76 2.73 722.90 722.80 0.0037 201 H2 203 166 0.41 0.92 0.71 0.29 0.66 11.07 0.95 5.86 1.89 0.97 0.87 12 2.05 2.61 2.90 722.80 722.25 0.0033 203 H3 345 67 0.26 0.26 0.58 0.15 0.15 9.40 0.29 6.15 0.93 12 3.77 4.80 3.83 722.40 721.65 0.0112 345 H4 207 67 0.25 2.43 0.58 0.15 1.53 11.89 0.17 5.72 6.79 15 7.28 5.93 6.54 721.55 720.70 0.0127 207 H5 341 103 0.57 0.57 0.58 0.33 0.33 14.00 0.50 5.35 1.77 12 2.49 3.18 3.44 722.30 721.80 0.0049 341 H6 343 56 0.42 0.99 0.58 0.24 0.57 14.50 0.25 5.27 102 15 4.31 3.51 3.80 721.80 721.55 0.0045 343 H7 209 128 0.32 2.75 0.58 0.18 1.71 14.74 0.42 5.22 6.99 18 7.76 4.39 5.05 720.50 719.80 0.0055 209 211 74 2.75 0.00 1.71 15.17 0.25 5.15 6.87 18 7.72 4.37 5.01 719.80 719.40 0.0054 211 213 138 2.75 0.00 1.71 15.41 0.48 5.11 6.80 18 7.48 4.23 4.81 719.40 718.70 0.0051 213 H7A 323 42 0.65 0.65 0.71 0.46 0.46 12.40 0.15 5.63 1.16 1.16 1.45 12 4.60 5.86 4.71 720.00 719.30 0.0167 323 H8 325 26 0.53 1.18 0.71 0.37 0.84 12.55 0.06 5.61 7.02 15 8.01 6.54 7.47 719.10 718.70 0.0154 325 H9 327 61 0.40 1.58 0.71 0.28 1.12 12.61 0.18 5.60 7.38 18 8.53 4.83 5.51 718.50 718.10 0.0066 327 H10 329 26 0.24 1.83 0.71 0.17 1.30 12.79 0.06 5.56 7.21 18 11.26 6.38 6.74 718.10 717.80 0.0115 329 H 11 331 21 0.91 2.74 0.71 0.65 1.94 12.86 0.05 5.55 10.79 21 15.44 6.42 6.94 717.60 717.40 0.0095 331 333 71 2.74 0.00 1.94 12.91 0.25 5.54 10.78 21 11.09 4.61 4.81 717.40 717.05 0.0049 333 333B 62 2.74 0.00 1.94 13.15 0.18 5.50 10.69 21 11.85 4.93 5.66 717.05 716.70 0.0056 333B H12 347 75 0.34 0.34 0.58 0.20 0.20 15.40 0.38 5.12 1.01 12 2.92 3.71 3.27 720.50 720.00 0.0067 347 H13 349 60 0.32 0.66 0.58 0.18 0.38 15.78 0.23 5.05 1.93 12 3.24 4.13 4.29 720.00 719.50 0.0083 349 H14 215 58 0.25 2.99 0.58 0.14 1.85 16.01 0.12 5.02 7.34 18 13.77 7.80 7.90 718.70 717.70 0.0172 215 H15 217 75 0.28 6.66 0.58 0.16 4.34 16.14 0.31 5.00 21.68 27 16.09 4.05 4.05 716.70 716.50 0.0027 217 219 87 6.66 0.00 4.34 16.45 0.19 4.95 21.46 27 27.69 6.97 7.74 716.50 715.80 0.0080 219 \\hrgyvnas\Data\88130135\Design\Calc\Storm\030269.04-PHASE 2-STORM-RUN-BASIN H.xls Page 1 STORM SEWER COMPUTATION SHEET BASIN H PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE-Phase 2 COMPUTED BY: GEK DATE: 5/25/2006 JOB NO: YKFD-030269.04-03 CHECKED BY: DWS UPDATED: 8/21/2007 DRAINAGE AREA RUNOFF FLOW TIME RAINFALL TOTAL INLET BYPASS PIPE CAPACITY VELOCITY (FT/SEC) INVERT ELEVATION PIPE BASIN PIPE LENGTH (ACRES) COEFF. "A"x "C" (MINUTE) INTENSITY RUNOFF CAPACITY FLOW DIAMETER FULL FLOWING DESIGN UPPER LOWER SLOPE TAG# (FEET) INCREMENT TOTAL nCi� INCREMENT TOTAL TO UPPER END IN SECTION (INCH/HOUR) (CFS) (CFS) (INCHES) (CFS) FULL FLOW END END FT/FT H16 317 26 0.91 0.91 0.71 0.65 0.65 9.60 0.07 6.12 3.95 12 4.42 5.63 6.47 718.20 717.80 0.0154 317 H17 319 18 0.61 1.52 0.71 0.43 1.08 9.67 0.04 6.11 6.60 15 8.27 6.74 7.55 717.60 717.30 0.0164 319 221 155 8.18 0.00 5.42 16.63 0.35 4.92 26.64 27 27.78 6.99 7.42 715.60 714.35 0.0081 221 H18 223 27 0.31 8.49 0.58 0.18 5.60 16.98 0.06 4.86 27.20 27 28.54 7.18 7.69 714.35 714.12 0.0085 223 H19 313 45 0.28 0.28 0.58 0.16 0.16 8.70 0.19 6.27 1.01 12 3.75 4.78 3.92 715.00 714.50 0.0111 313 225 141 8.77 0.00 5.76 17.04 0.30 4.85 27.93 27 29.21 7.35 7.83 712.00 710.75 0.0089 225 H2O 227 150 0.82 9.58 0.58 0.47 6.23 17.34 0.32 4.80 29.92 27 30.41 7.66 7.84 710.75 709.30 0.0097 227 H21 229 155 0.54 10.13 0.58 0.32 6.55 17.66 0.36 4.75 31.10 30 32.93 6.71 7.28 709.30 708.30 0.0065 229 H22 231 136 0.65 10.77 0.58 0.38 6.92 18.01 0.41 4.69 32.48 30 27.20 5.55 5.55 707.50 706.90 0.0044 231 H23 233 58 0.53 11.30 0.58 0.31 7.23 18.42 0.14 4.63 33.43 30 34.06 6.94 7.14 706.55 706.15 0.0069 233 H24 235 57 0.39 11.69 0.58 0.22 7.45 18.56 0.12 4.60 34.31 30 36.24 7.39 7.98 705.95 705.50 0.0078 235 H25 237 57 0.19 11.87 0.58 0.11 7.56 18.68 0.12 4.58 34.66 30 36.21 7.38 7.86 705.50 705.06 0.0078 237 H26 239 141 0.30 12.18 0.58 0.18 7.74 18.80 0.36 4.56 35.32 36 39.67 5.62 6.44 704.50 704.00 0.0035 239 241 132 12.18 0.00 7.74 19.16 0.33 4.51 34.86 36 41.10 5.82 6.60 703.50 703.00 0.0038 241 H27 299 27 0.53 0.53 0.71 0.38 0.38 11.80 0.10 5.74 1.09 1.09 1.08 12 4.33 5.52 4.43 711.60 711.20 0.0148 299 H28 301 168 0.57 1.10 0.71 0.40 0.78 11.90 0.43 5.72 2.18 1.13 1.20 12 5.63 7.18 6.54 711.20 707.00 0.0250 301 H41 B 261 27 0.52 0.52 0.71 0.37 0.37 10.20 0.10 6.02 1.11 1.11 1.12 12 4.33 5.52 4.45 705.00 704.60 0.0148 261 H29A 259 49 0.37 0.89 0.71 0.26 0.63 12.50 0.19 5.62 1.86 0.89 0.57 12 3.23 4.11 4.24 704.60 704.20 0.0082 259 H29 257 26 0.74 1.63 0.71 0.53 1.56 12.69 0.06 5.58 10.36 18 12.11 6.86 7.80 703.80 703.45 0.0133 257 H30 255 23 0.71 2.34 0.71 0.50 1.66 12.75 0.05 5.57 13.22 18 13.57 7.69 7.98 703.45 703.06 0.0167 255 H31 305 26 0.79 0.79 0.71 0.56 0.56 11.10 0.07 5.86 3.28 12 4.42 5.63 6.18 716.20 715.80 0.0154 305 H32 307 27 0.81 1.60 0.71 0.58 1.14 11.17 0.06 5.85 6.64 15 7.86 6.41 7.26 715.80 715.40 0.0148 307 309 150 1.60 0.00 1.14 11.23 0.37 5.84 6.63 15 7.28 5.93 6.73 715.40 713.50 0.0127 309 \\hrgyvnas\Data\88130135\Design\Calc\Storm\030269.04-PHASE 2-STORM-RUN-BASIN H.xls Page 2 STORM SEWER COMPUTATION SHEET BASIN H PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE-Phase 2 COMPUTED BY: GEK DATE: 5/25/2006 JOB NO: YKFD-030269.04-03 CHECKED BY: DWS UPDATED: 8/21/2007 DRAINAGE AREA RUNOFF FLOW TIME RAINFALL TOTAL INLET BYPASS PIPE CAPACITY VELOCITY (FT/SEC) INVERT ELEVATION PIPE BASIN PIPE LENGTH (ACRES) COEFF. "A"x "C" (MINUTE) INTENSITY RUNOFF CAPACITY FLOW DIAMETER FULL FLOWING DESIGN UPPER LOWER SLOPE TAG# (FEET) INCREMENT TOTAL nCu INCREMENT TOTAL TO UPPER END IN SECTION (INCH/HOUR) (CFS) (CFS) (INCHES) (CFS) FULL FLOW END END FT/FT 271 46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 6.91 0.00 12 5.25 6.69 0.00 716.00 715.00 0.0217 271 H33 273 167 0.65 0.66 0.58 0.38 0.38 7.40 0.62 6.50 2.47 12 3.15 4.01 4.46 715.00 713.70 0.0078 273 H34 275 151 0.67 2.92 0.58 0.39 1.90 11.60 0.32 5.77 10.98 18 12.09 6.85 7.78 713.30 711.30 0.0133 275 H35 277 124 0.64 3.56 0.58 0.37 2.27 11.93 0.26 5.71 13.00 18 13.32 7.55 7.82 710.50 708.50 0.0161 277 279 81 3.56 0.00 2.27 12.19 0.17 5.67 12.89 18 13.32 7.55 7.91 708.00 706.70 0.0161 279 H36 281 82 0.79 5.45 0.58 0.46 3.51 12.33 0.18 5.64 17.53 24 21.57 6.87 7.72 706.50 705.75 0.0091 281 H37 283 92 0.39 5.84 0.58 0.23 3.74 12.51 0.21 5.61 18.69 27 26.99 6.79 7.32 705.10 704.40 0.0076 283 H38 285 76 0.54 6.37 0.58 0.31 4.05 12.72 0.16 5.58 20.29 27 28.71 7.23 7.82 704.40 703.75 0.0086 285 287 136 8.26 0.00 5.39 12.88 0.30 5.55 29.45 36 51.22 7.25 7.47 703.60 702.80 0.0059 287 H39 293 26 0.75 0.75 0.71 0.53 0.53 10.50 0.07 5.96 3.17 12 4.42 5.63 6.12 708.90 708.50 0.0154 293 H40 295 169 0.80 1.55 0.71 0.57 1.10 10.57 0.45 5.95 6.56 15 7.02 5.73 6.30 708.50 706.50 0.0118 295 H41 A 289 60 0.34 0.34 0.71 0.24 0.24 10.20 0.24 6.02 0.88 0.88 0.57 12 4.36 5.56 4.17 706.90 706.00 0.0150 289 H41 249 26 0.60 0.60 0.71 0.43 0.43 9.00 0.07 6.22 4.34 15 8.01 6.54 6.64 704.40 704.00 0.0154 249 H42 247 26 0.47 1.07 0.71 0.33 0.76 9.07 0.06 6.21 6.39 15 7.96 6.49 7.28 704.00 703.60 0.0152 247 243 69 23.85 0.00 15.54 19.50 0.15 4.45 69.19 42 71.12 7.40 7.70 702.10 701.76 0.0050 243 245 158 23.85 0.00 15.54 19.65 0.37 4.43 68.82 42 67.84 7.06 7.06 697.72 697.00 0.0046 245 \\hrgyvnas\Data\88130135\Design\Calc\Storm\030269.04-PHASE 2-STORM-RUN-BASIN H.xls Page 3 STORM SEWER COMPUTATION SHEET BASIN Q PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE-Phase 2 COMPUTED BY: GEK DATE: JOB NO: YKFD-030269.04-03 CHECKED BY: DWS UPDATED DRAINAGE AREA RUNOFF1 FLOW TIME RAINFALL TOTAL PIPE CAPACITY VELOCITY (FT/SEC) INVERT ELEVATION PIPE BASIN PIPE LENGTH (ACRES) COEFF. "A"x "C" (MINUTE) INTENSITY RUNOFF DIAMETER FULL FLOWING DESIGN UPPER LOWER SLOPE TAG# (FEET) INCREMENT TOTAL nC', INCREMENT TOTAL TO UPPER END IN SECTION (INCH/HOU (CFS) (INCHES) (CFS) FULL FLOW END END FT/FT Q1 786 26 0.87 0.87 0.71 0.62 0.62 8.00 0.07 6.39 3.97 12 4.42 5.63 6.47 708.80 708.40 0.0154 786 0.450 Q2 789 20 0.95 1.83 0.71 0.68 1.30 11.30 0.05 5.82 7.55 15 7.91 6.45 6.89 707.90 707.60 0.0150 789 0.358 TO FES 791 168 0.00 1.83 0.00 0.00 1.30 11.35 0.35 5.82 7.54 1 15 8.55 6.97 7.98 669.95 697.00 0.0175 791 1.012 \\hrgyvnas\Data\88130135\Design\Calc\Storm\030269.04-P HAS E 2-STORM-RUN-BASIN Q.xls Page 1 SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS 759 JOHN STREET YORKVIU.E, ILLINOIS 60560 PH: 630-553-7560 FAY- 630-553-7646 -w-w-w.smithengineering,com E-MAIL: sec@smithengineering.com oMeHENRY w R"TLEY ■YORKVULE ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL DESIGN FIRM # 184-000108 COMP FILE: PHASE 2 DRAINAGE MAP.dwg PLOT FILE. STANDARD VIEW- 0,30269-PROP-EXHIBIT EXISTING RAINTREE VILLAGE --UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE-6 z �cl P lt VA6 im-st rive- - �7 0 7 > wL 0 Ig -c go o. M, i9z I 0; BASIN 1A Lo $0 a 25 cr oustie-Trafl- P C r R /BASIN I B) dw > 1p P E R 0 R-i.=Aint-Dri'e —C L& p 44'' A. - V�' Rp-nf re i4l p -4t p in 41 2F, E a� Fp C-0 urvea-Lane M 13 p BASIN 2 i4 f Lai Argyll Court I H§ 0 I ORIENTATION MAP BASIN 3A BASIN 4 m BASIN 3B PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 0 BASIN 3c z' Ashley Rd PHASE 2 DRAINAGE MAP f/ — REVISIONS DWN BY: INT: DATE: PROJECT NO. 1. GETS 1 08-70-05 GE-K 06-13_-06 YKFO—0JO269.04 2 DSN BY: INT: HORIZ SCALE: SHEET NO. 3. GEK I" = 150' 4. CHK BY: INT: VERT SCALE: 7 OF 1 5. D WS Reference: PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION: Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report Detention Summary(Phase II) 24-Hour Storm Filled Total Required Provided Drainage Area CN Tc Volume Depression Required Volume Basin (acres) (hrs) Volume Volume (ac-ft) ac-ft (ac-ft) (ac-ft) 2 34.82 74 0.55 11.75 3.48 15.23 12.50 3A 20.49 74 0.28 7.81 1.29 9.10 7.97 3B 30.18 73 0.56 6.77 0.13 6.90 7.04 31 1.00 63 0.17 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.25 4 47.43 74 0.87 13.03 0.00 13.03 16.68 Totals= 133.92 39.42 4.90 44.32 44.44 Total *Allowable **Required ***Final *Allowable **Required ***Final *Allowable **Required ***Final Drainage Area 2-yr 2-yr 2-yr 25-yr 25-yr 25-yr 100-yr 100-yr 100-yr (acres) Release Rate Release Rate Release Rate Release Rate Release Rate Release Rate Release Rate Release Rate Release Rate (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 133.92 5.36 3.55 2.53 10.71 9.49 5.54 13.39 13.13 7.3 Allowable Release Rate based on Ordinance prescribed rates Required Release Rate is discharge calculated for"Required Volume"XP-SWMM model ***Final Release Rate is discharge calculated for Proposed Conditions"XP-SWMM model utilizing depressional storage P1 AmrL A Kenig,Lindgren.CJ'Hartia,AbDc€ra,Inc. 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 1 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-99901 £ 847-518-9987 MEMORANDUM TO: Michelle Stewart Yorkville Christian High School FROM: Michael K. Scavo Consultant Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal DATE: August 28, 2013 SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Study Proposed High School Yorkville, Illinois This memorandum summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the proposed Yorkville Christian High School to be located in Yorkville, Illinois. The site is located within the Prestwick subdivision which occupies the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The proposed school will have a maximum enrollment of 850 students and will utilize the two access roads that will serve the subdivision. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site area. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the development. The sections of this report present the following. • Existing roadway conditions • A description of the proposed single family development • Directional distribution of the development generated traffic • Vehicle trip generation for the proposed single family development • Future traffic conditions including access to the site • Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours • Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access roads, adjacent roadway network, and internal roadway network KLOA, Inc. Transportation and Parking Planning Consultants r' --.( • CommunRy Palk' 1 Q a T1 3 W.Vete SaW Wee' � g organ-NYn 36 - s F'hwY. 'Kee Park f P a BeeclSer. � d - Hiding `Spar Park RVF Rd a AT �eP4 a. Van Emmw _ Mmp4 ® R rairg,�v d E ` s .Yvrkvllle ,ik. Van 2� `5io qa 4.xs� AT Qesuvatian Rd ' Sh.Park ,Pd 6r_� aT ox ea ,p s age Par �"a orh°use a Harris County Yallage Park A Ru p . Fared Preserve tt6 _4 16 E Sch_ TO] FSITE ]' - ��cnov«use Rd r n Ament Rd _ m ar.' WAader ad ° rvheeiei 0 �; Rd wafkdi Pd wzWer Rd w,iker r,d s Site Location Figure 1 2 +t x - --- SCHppLp� Aerial View �1 W 1l - .J`1 of 1 1 Existing Conditions Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were documented based on a field visit conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location The proposed site is located within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision which is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The subdivision, of which Phase 1 is partially occupied, was approved for a total of 356 single-family homes. The proposed school will replace 84 approved single-family lots. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the site are described below. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is an east-west arterial road that provides a two-lane rural cross- section within the vicinity of the site. No parking is allowed on either side of the road. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under the jurisdiction of Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Within the vicinity of the site, the roadway has a posted speed limit of 50 mph and carries an average daily traffic (ADT)volume of 6,650 vehicles. Ashley Road is a north-south two-lane road that terminates at its stop sign controlled intersection with Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). The roadway is under the jurisdiction of Kendall Township with portions adjacent to Prestwick of Yorkville under the jurisdiction of City of Yorkville. Ashley Road has a 55 mph speed limit and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) of 500 vehicles. Penman Road is a two-lane road that provides access to Prestwick subdivision. Its approach to Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under stop sign control. No turn lanes are provided on Schoolhouse Road(IL 126) Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period traffic counts at the following intersections. • Schoolhouse Road(IL 126)with Ashley Road • Schoolhouse Road(IL 126)with Penman Road 4 The traffic counts were conducted on Tuesday, August 11, 2013 during the morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and evening (3:000 to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods. The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:30 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and the evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 4:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. Figure 3 illustrates the existing peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Development Plan As proposed, the plans call for a high school with a maximum enrollment of 850 students. Access to the proposed site will be provided mainly off Ashley Road with secondary access off Schoolhouse Road(IL 126)via Penman Road. Directional Distribution of Site Traffic The directional distribution of future site-generated trips on the roadway system is a function of several variables, including the operational characteristics of the roadway system and the ease with which drivers can travel over various sections of the roadway system without encountering congestion. The directions from which site-generated traffic will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 4 illustrates the directional distribution of traffic. Estimated Site Traffic Generation The volume of traffic generated by a development is based on the type of land use and the size of the development. The number of peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed high school was based on vehicle trip generation rates contained in the Trip Generation Manual, 9f Edition,published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 1 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Weekday A.M. Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Peak Hour ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total Daily 530 High School(850 Students) 230 135 365 80 165 245 1,450 5 sC, N r�OGs� NOT TO SCALE I ,ss�• O 156 (340) r 6 (36) • 66 247-►� 126 9 (9) i PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION PHASE I �� C"co I ; SITE �• - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -' PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION • PHASE 2 L . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . W D J Q X0 y � a LEGEND 00 -AM PEAK HOUR (7:30-8:30 AM) (00) - PM PEAK HOUR (4:00-5:00 PM) PROJECT: TITLE: Yorkville Christian Existing Weekday Traffic Volumes Job No: 13-138 High School Figure: 3 �p I� ti -o I�;pGs NOT TO SCALE ' � F I � Q 40% I ' � • � . , 126 i PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION PHASE I I ; SITE �• - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -' PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION • PHASE 2 CD _ W D J Q = O y � a LEGEND 00% - PERCENT DISTRIBUTION PROJECT: TITLE: Yorkville Christian Estimated Directional Distribution High School Job No: 13-138 Figure: 4 As shown in Table 1, the development is estimated to generate approximately 365 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday morning peak hour, approximately 245 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday evening peak hour, and 1,450 total vehicle trips during the day. It should be noted that the estimated trips represent the peak hours of the school which in the morning it coincides with the roadway system peak hour while in the evening it occurs prior to the street system peak hour. However, for the purpose of this analysis, the evening trip generation was assumed to coincide with the roadway system's peak hour. Furthermore, while the school is anticipated to generate some of its traffic from within Prestwick subdivision, it was assumed, in order to further present a conservative analysis, that all trips will be external. Trip Generation Comparison As indicated earlier, the proposed school site within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision will replace approximately 84 single-family home sites. Table 2 is proposed summarizing the amount of traffic the eliminated lots will generate utilizing ITE trip generation rates. Table 2 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Weekday A.M. Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Peak Hour ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total Daily 210 84 Single-Family Homes 17 52 69 76 44 121 894 When compared to the amount of traffic the school will generate at full occupancy, it can be seen that the proposed school will result in an increase of approximately 296 trips during the morning peak hour, 124 trips during the evening peak hour and 556 daily trips. It is important to note that the school trips are conservative in that not all of the trips will be generated externally and that the estimated trips in the evening peak hour will occur before the roadway system peak hour. Projected Traffic Volumes The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system (Figure 5) in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. In addition to the traffic generated by the development, the study also included traffic that will be generated by the full buildout of the Prestwick subdivision as well as the increase in background traffic assumed at two percent per year applied over a seven year period. The existing traffic volumes were therefore increased by fourteen percent and combined with the peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed school and buildout of Prestwick subdivision to determine the projected traffic volumes which are shown in Figure 6. 8 sC, N I`�pG`rt� NOT TO SCALE •�'gp'gC eo TN.9�� h ♦• I r 92 (32) ! • ` 80 X25 • 1 126 i PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION PHASE I 1 v n ' 1 • � � 1 I , , 1 I SITE 1 � ~ I . 1 1 96 14 (17 I - - - - - - - - - - - - ) . � - ao I � N PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION • PHASE 2 L . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . _ . . W C J a X0 y � a LEGEND 00 -AM PEAK HOUR (7:30-8:30 AM) (00) - PM PEAK HOUR (4:00-5:00 PM) PROJECT: TITLE: Yorkville Christian Estimated Site-Generated High School Traffic Volumes Job No: 13-138 Figure: 5 sC, N I`�oG`rt� NOT TO SCALE .`•90 X19 • O SS �•����• �2 Z � ♦ r i �Q.oan'�� 188 (418) 109 (118) 211 297-► 126 95 (45) i PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION do PHASE I , N -- i �, I %0 o , SITE i 146'(143) t , I - - - - - - - - - - - - - , 24 (22) x . _ M Co N C" PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION • PHASE 2 JD J'Q X0 y � a LEGEND 00 -AM PEAK HOUR (7:30-8:30 AM) (00) - PM PEAK HOUR (4:00-5:00 PM) PROJECT: TITLE: Yorkville Christian Projected Total Traffic Volumes Job No: 13-138 High School Figure: 6 Site Access Access to the school site will be provided via two access roads: a full ingress-egress access road on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via the existing Penman road and a full ingress/egress access road on Ashley Road via the proposed access road planned to serve Phase 2 of the Prestwick subdivision and the proposed school. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Penman Road A full ingress/egress access road is provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Outbound movements from this access road are under stop control. This approach will operate at acceptable levels of service in the morning and evening peak hours under proposed conditions. A westbound left-turn lane should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) meeting IDOT's design criteria for 30 mph speed limit (220 feet of taper and 215 feet of storage). An eastbound right-turn lane will not be required or warranted. Two northbound lanes striped to indicate a separate left-turn lane and separate right-turn lane will also be provided via restriping of the existing pavement. Ashley Road and Proposed Access Road A full ingress/egress access road will be provided on Ashley Road approximately 1,800 feet south of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). Outbound movements from this access road will be under stop control. Widening of Ashley Road to provide turn lanes will not be necessary. Traffic Analysis Traffic analyses were performed for the intersections within the study area to determine the operation of the existing roadway system, evaluate the impact of the proposed single family home development, and determine the ability of the existing roadway system to accommodate projected traffic demands. Analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the existing traffic volumes and the projected traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using HCS 2010 computer software, which is based on the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2010. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter grade from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. Control delay is that portion of the total delay attributed to the traffic signal or stop sign control operation and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Level of Service A is the highest grade (best traffic flow and least delay), Level of Service E represents saturated or at-capacity conditions, and Level of Service F is the lowest grade (oversaturated conditions, extensive delays). For two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersections, levels of service are only calculated for the approaches controlled by a stop sign (not for the intersection as a whole). The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for unsignalized intersections are shown in Table 2. The results of the capacity analysis 11 are summarized in Table 3 for the existing volumes and Table 4 for the projected volumes. Table 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA—UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Average Total Delay(SEC/VEH) A 0 - 10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 D >25 - 35 E > 35 - 50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual,2010. Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126)with Ashley Road B 10.0 B 12.2 Schoolhouse Road(IL 126) with Penman Road B 10.7 B 12.3 LOS -Level of Service Delay-Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road(IL 126) with Ashley Road B 11.8 B 13.9 Schoolhouse Road(IL 126) with Penman Road B 12.9 C 15.1 Ashley Road with Proposed Access Road A 9.9 B 10.6 LOS -Level of Service Delay-Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. 12 Traffic Evaluation The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road currently operates at an acceptable level of service during morning and evening peak hours. With the additional traffic resulting from the development of the site and the ambient growth, the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. It is recommended that a westbound left-turn lane be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and that Ashley Road be widened to provide two northbound lanes striped to indicate an exclusive left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. The outbound movements from Ashley Road should continue to be under stop sign control. An eastbound right-turn lane will not be required or warranted. At the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road, the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service assuming the provision of a westbound left-turn lane. An eastbound right-turn lane will not be required nor warranted. At the intersection of Ashley Road with the proposed access road, acceptable levels of service are projected to occur with traffic exiting the development under stop sign control. No widening of Ashley Road will be necessary. Conclusion and Recommendations Based on the proposed development plans and the preceding traffic impact study, the following conclusions and recommendations are made. • The addition of the new traffic generated by the proposed school will be accommodated by the roadway system. • Westbound left-turn lanes should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) at its intersections with Ashley Road and Penman Road. • The two site access roads will be adequate to serve the total traffic that will be generated by the proposed school and full occupancy of Prestwick subdivision. 13-138 Stewart Proposed Yorkville Christian High School August 28 2013 mks Ira 13 Memorandum To: City Council EST. 183fi From: Bart Olson, City Administrator ' CC: Date: September 5, 2013 Subject: Prestwick parks land-cash contribution LJILL E�% Summary Discussion of the Prestwick parks land-cash contribution value per acre. Background The parks land-cash contribution value per acre remains an open item in the Prestwick annexation agreement amendment. The petitioner has taken the unique route to do their own land-cash acreage valuation,providing a per acre estimate at $25,000. The City's most recent land-cash acreage valuation was completed in May 2012, and it set the current per acre estimate of improved land in Yorkville at $30,000. The City's most recently approved land-cash ordinance was approved at the height of the building boom in 2006, and valued an acre at $101,000 per acre. The land-cash ordinance adopted by City Council that set the $101,000 per acre value is allowable under the City's non-home rule authority. We have relatively tight requirements under state and case law to prove that the $101,000 per acre value is an accurate estimate of the current conditions observed in Yorkville. Obviously, we know that the current value is much less than that. This would be a problem for our ability to unilaterally impose the fees on a landowner or developer. However, almost all of the development completed in the City in the past decade has been under the context of an annexation agreement or PUD agreement, which gives the City wider authority to negotiate various fees and other items with a developer. In general, the City can negotiate any impact fees or land-cash fees (including per acreage values) as long as the developer-landowner agrees to them. This wider authority gives the City the ability to offset the impacts of new developments that may not have been contemplated when the City originally annexes the property, or when the original plan wants to be amended by the developer. Up to this point, the staff recommendation has been open ended, based on Park Board's preference to not approve any agreement that has a very low per acre land-cash value. In short, the recommendation had been to leave the per acreage value blank until Unit 2 of the subdivision is developed(with no deadline in the agreement as to when it gets developed) and seek a higher per acre valuation at that time, or to approve a land-cash value of$80,000 per acre. The concept of waiting until Unit 2 of the subdivision is built before setting the parks land-cash per acre value is problematic because the act of approving a Unit 2 final plat does not require an annexation agreement amendment, which means the City's ability to negotiate the parks land-cash fee at that time is weaker under state and case law. It is also problematic because the parks land-cash fee for Unit 1 homes would be $0 per unit, and then the entirety of the parks land-cash contribution would be spread over all of the homes in Unit 2. The City has a developer willing and able to build a school and homes in front of the City Council, seeking various amendments to the current plan and a motivation to build homes in the development. The parks land-cash fee should be negotiated now. The timing of the parks land-cash fee payment set in ordinance is 1/3 at time of final plat, 1/3 at time of issuance of the first occupancy permit in the plat or within 1 year from recordation of the final plat(whichever is first), and the remainder is due at time of public infrastructure acceptance or within 2 years from the recordation of final plat(whichever is first). This payment structure can be deviated from in an annexation agreement amendment. In most of our agreements, the payment of the fee is forced entirely onto the building permit. In these subdivisions, the City receives small contributions over the course of the build out of the subdivision, which can be upwards of 10 years. While the City's cost to construct a park or to buy land may increase over time, the parks land-cash fee does not. It is for this reason that we have typically not accepted a developer's recommendation on land-cash per acreage values. So, the two choices for parks land-cash fees are: 1) Follow the Parks Land-Cash fee ordinance to the letter of the law: a. Pay 1/3 of the fee at time of final plat b. Pay 1/3 of the fee at time of first occupancy permit or within 1 year of(a) c. Pay 1/3 of the fee at time of infrastructure acceptance or within 2 years of(a) 2) Negotiate a different payment amount and payment timing schedule in an annexation agreement or PUD agreement, taking into account the unique impacts of the development regarding size, land-use, timing, etc. The petitioner has agreed to build a parking lot on the park site, which would provide a credit to against the City's park-land cash requirement. Up to this point in the discussions, they have declined to offer any other financial contribution up front, so the act of requiring the "1/3"payments above seems like a longshot. The buildout of the 286 houses in the subdivision is likely to be over several years, which means construction costs and land values will be much greater than the current $30,000 per acre. The history of the City's land-cash per acre values is: 1977-13 $15,000/acre 1990-16 $25,000/acre 1996-3 $45,000/acre 2003-12 $58,000/acre 2004-22 $73,500/acre 2005-37 $80,000/acre 2006-91 $101,000/acre The most reasonable middle ground in the values seems to be 2003's $58,000 per acre. Between 1990 and 2006, the value increased from $25,000 per acre to $101,000. Given that the current acreage value is somewhere between 1990 and 1996, and the subdivision will take several years to buildout, the final value of land-cash could be much higher than $58,000 per acre. Additionally, because the City is accepting the land-cash fees at time of building permit, the future value of land-cash fees will be diminished over time (the fees stay the same, but construction costs get more expensive). Finally, the act of placing the land-cash fees on the building permit means that the developer will not be directly responsible for paying the fees out of pocket—it will be the builder, which will wrap the land-cash fee into the price of the home. Thus, I am making the recommendation that the City Council adopt the agreement with the per acre land-cash value of$58,000. While the petitioner has rejected this dollar value, I still feel that is the most fair to the City. If the City Council approves the agreement with the $58,000 per acre value, the developer will have the choice to accept the agreement as is or reject it. Recommendation I recommend the Prestwick annexation agreement amendment be approved with a $58,000 per acre land-cash value. `� I] CfTy Reviewed By: X06 Legal Agenda Item Number Finance ❑ PC #2b EST. -� __ti 1836 Engineer ❑ City Administrator 0 Human Resources ❑ Tracking Number Community Development PC 2013-13 Police ALE � Public Works ❑ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Prestwick of Yorkville (Yorkville Christian School)—Final Plat Meeting and Date: City Council/September 10, 2013 Synopsis: Request for Final Plat approval of the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: 8-14-13 Action Taken: Plan Commission Recomendation Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Majority Council Action Requested: Vote Submitted by: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department Agenda Item Notes: Memorandum 0 To: City Council 1es6 Esr. From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director 1 `= CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: September 5, 2013 TSubject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville—Yorkville Christian School Final Kendae counTy �� <LE Plat Approval Petitioner's Request& Background: In April 2005, the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision (fka Highlands at Ashley Pointe), located in the southwest quadrant of IL Route 126 and Ashley Road, was granted annexation agreement approval via Ord. 2005-30 to construct a total of 345 single-family residential dwelling units on approximately 190 acres of land in two (2) phases to be platted as Unit 1 and Unit 2 within the R-2 One-Family Residence District. While both Units 1 and 2 were given Final Plat approval (Res. 2005-78 and Res. 2006-82, respectively), only Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision was recorded. Currently, four (4) single family homes in Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision have been constructed. Since that time, the subdivision's original developer lost the property in foreclosure and ownership reverted back to Homestar Bank in 2012. The new proposals calls for the resubdivision of Lot 358 in Unit I of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision and removes 84 lots originally contained in a portion of Unit 2 (refer to attached reference plat). The new Final Plat of Subdivision for the Yorkville Christian School consists of 31.61 acres of land planned for a state-of-the-art 60,000 square foot, three-level private secondary education facility, athletic fields, on-site parking and other accessory structures. Approximately 5.54 acres will be utilized for retention area and open space to be conveyed to the future homeowners association(HOA). Finally, the remaining 6.48 acres will be dedicated for public right-of-way as Whitekirk Lane and Mustang Way. Plan Commission Action The Plan Commission reviewed the requested rezoning at a public hearing held on August 14, 2013 and made the following favorable action on the motion below: In consideration of the proposed Final Plat of Subdivision for the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision, the Plan Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request for Final Plat approval, as presented by the Petitioner in a plan prepared by HR Green date last revised August 6, 2013, subject to review comments prepared by the City's Engineering Consultant, EEI, in a letter dated July 23, 2013 as stated in a staff recommendation provided in a memorandum dated August 8, 2013 and further subject to City Council approval of the amended annexation agreement allowing a school and accessory structures as a permitted land use in the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision {insert any additional conditions of the Plan Commission)... Action Item• Lindblom-aye; Weaver- aye; Prochaska-aye, Jones-aye, Baker-aye 5 ayes; 0 nays Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner's Application w/attachments. 2. Final Plat of Subdivision—Yorkville Christian School Subdivision dated last revised 08/06/13 prepared by HR Green. 3. Final Plat of Subdivision—Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Exhibit illustrating the proposed removed 84 single-family lots marked"FOR REFERENCE ONLY"dated 07/2/13 prepared by HR Green. 4. Yorkville Christian School-Vicinity Plan prepared by HR Green. 5. EEI Letter to the City dated July 23,2013 re:Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 1. CIP �a Memorandum EST. —� yeas To: Plan Commission -�� From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director co CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator a o 20 Date: August 8, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville—Yorkville Christian School Final Plat Approval Petitioner Request/BackLround: In April 2005, the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision (1ka Highlands at Ashley Pointe), located in the southwest quadrant of IL Route 126 and Ashley Road, was granted annexation agreement approval via Ord. 2005-30 to construct a total of 345 single-family residential dwelling units on approximately 190 acres of land in two (2) phases to be platted as Unit 1 and Unit 2 within the R-2 One-Family Residence District. While both Units 1 and 2 were given Final Plat approval (Res. 2005-78 and Res. 2006-82, respectively), only Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision was recorded. Currently, four (4) single family homes in Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision have been constructed. Since that time, the subdivision's original developer lost the property in foreclosure and ownership reverted back to Homestar Bank in 2012. In March of 2013, the Petitioners, John and Michelle Stewart, repurchased the entire property, which originally belonged to their family, for the purpose of revamping the land plan to replace some of the single-family lots in a portion of the development with a new private Christian high school focusing on agriculture and farming technologies. Although the current R-2 One-Family Residence District zoning identifies schools as a permitted use, the existing annexation agreement will need approval by the City Council to be amended in order to change the land use. The Plan Commission prevue as part of this process is to review and forward a recommendation to the City Council regarding the Final Plat which will allow for the resubdivision of Lot 358 in Unit 1 and a portion of Unit 2 to construct the proposed new school. Proposed Final Plat: The proposed 43.62-acre area resubdivides Lot 358 in Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision and removes 84 lots originally contained in a portion of Unit 2 (refer to attached reference plat). The new Final Plat of Subdivision for the Yorkville Christian School consists of 31.61 acres of land planned for a state-of-the-art 60,000 square foot, three-level private secondary education facility, athletic fields, on-site parking and other accessory structures. Approximately 5.54 acres will be utilized for retention area and open space to be conveyed to the future homeowners association (HOA). Finally, the remaining 6.48 acres will be dedicated for public right-of-way as Whitekirk Lane and Mustang Way. The following comparison table details the change in density(dwelling units per acre) within this area of the development based on the existing and proposed plans: #of Dwelling Lots(Units) Net Area Residential Density(du/ac.) EXISTING 345 single-family lots 31.61Ac. 10.9 du/ac. PROPOSED 261 single-family lots 31.61 Ac. 8.3 du/ac. % Change Difference of 84 units(f24%Less) ---- Difference of 2.6 du/ac. (±24%Less) As anticipated, the change in overall residential density is approximately 24% less in the proposed resubdivision of the development than the existing single-family detached residential land 1 As a result of the resubdivision Lot#'s 273-356 from"Prestwick of Yorkville Unit 2"were removed. plan. With regard to the school site, the building foot print will encompass approximately 25,200 square feet of the approximately 31.61-acre site, well below the maximum 30% lot coverage allowed in the R-2 One-Family Residence District. Bulk Requirements • The required minimum lot area for the R-2 One-Family Residence District is as follows: • Detached residential — minimum 12,000 square feet lot area and minimum 100 ft width at building line. Complies • Non-residential —principal uses of buildings as permitted shall have a minimum two (2) acre area. Complies • Yard Area requirements for the R-2 One-Family Residence District are as follows: • Front Yard: Thirty feet (30')minimum setback. Complies • Side Yard: Ten feet (10') minimum setback or ten percent (10%), whichever is greater. • Corner Side Yard: Thirty feet(30') minimum setback. Complies • Rear Yard: Forty feet(40')minimum setback. Engineering The proposed Final Plat has been reviewed by the City's engineering consultant for compliance with the Subdivision Control Ordinance's Standards for Specification. Comments dated July 23, 2013 were provided to the Petitioner related to the Final Plat (see #22- 25 of the attached) and revised plat dated 08/06/13 was provided to Staff for review with the requested revisions, as attached. Staff Recommendation: Based upon the review of the Final Plat for the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision and its compliance with the City's Subdivision Control Ordinance and Standards for Specification requirements, staff recommends approval of the requested Final Plat subject to comments by the City Enzineer in a letter dated July 23, 2013 as attached to staffs memorandum dated August 8, 2013 and further subject to City Council approval of the amended annexation agreement allowinz a school and accessory structures as a permitted land use in the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision. Proposed Motion: In consideration of the proposed Final Plat of Subdivision for the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision, the Plan Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a requestfor Final Plat approval, as presented by the Petitioner in a plan prepared by HR Green date last revised August 6, 2013, subject to review comments prepared by the City's Engineering Consultant,EEI, in a letter dated July 23, 2013 as stated in a staff recommendation provided in a memorandum dated August 8, 2013 and further subject to City Council approval of the amended annexation agreement allowing a school and accessory structures as a permitted land use in the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision {insert any additional conditions of the Plan Commission)... Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner's Application w/attachments. 2. Final Plat of Subdivision—Yorkville Christian School Subdivision dated last revised 08/06/13 prepared by HR Green. 3. Final Plat of Subdivision—Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Exhibit illustrating the proposed removed 84 single-family lots marked"FOR REFERENCE ONLY"dated 07/2/13 prepared by HR Green. 4. Yorkville Christian School-Vicinity Plan prepared by HR Green. 5. EEI Letter to the City dated July 23,2013 re:Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 1. c'ry0 EST. , �,,,,,� 1836 GlUdlY 00011 I� 11 n.oe.nm.my ` <Le United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-3436 APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN & FINAL PLAT Purpose of Application The purpose of this application is to allow land to be divided and distributed in a way that conforms to the City of Yorkville's standards and enhances the land's value. Preliminary Plans and Final Plats allow the City Staff and local government to review how land will be developed and if it is ideal for that location within the city. This application is used to submit new preliminary plans and final plats but may also be used to ammend either of those documents. This packet explains the process to successfully submit and complete an Application for a Preliminary Plan and Final Plat. It includes a detailed description of the process and the actual application itself(Pages 6 to 8). Please type the required information in the application on your computer. The application will need to be printed and signed by the applicant. The only item that needs to be submitted from this packet is the application. The rest of the packet is to help guide you through the process unto completion. 1 Application Procedure Procedure Step l Submit Application, Fees, and All Pertinent Information to the Community Development Department Step 2 Plan Council Presentation Review (Meets 2nd and 4th Thursday of the month)' Z Step - Plan Commission Review (Meets 2nd Wednesday of the month) Step 4 Economic Development Committee Review (Meets 1 st Tuesday of the month) l Step 5 City Council Review (Meets 2nd and 4th Tuesday of the month) Step 6' Final Plat Recording (City's Clerk Office) 2 Application Procedure step I Application Submittal The following must be submitted to the Community Development Department: • 2 orignal signed applications with legal description. • 5 copies each of the application, proposed drawings, location map, site plan. • Appropriate filing fee. (See attached Fee Sheet on page 6) ® 1 CD containing an electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with ex- hibits), proposed drawings, location snap, and site plan. • Subdivision Plats: 15 copies depicting the originally platted lots, the proposed new lots, the proposed modifications and adjustments. 5 of the copies must be full size while the remaining 10 must be 11 " by 17' . Within one (1 ) week of submittal, the Community Development Department will determine if the aplication is complete or if additional information is needed. These materials must be submitted a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of the project. Applicant is responsible for malting submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, etc., to allow timely review by the City. Applicant will be responsible for payment of recording fees and public hearing costs, including written transcripts of the public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). The applicant will be required to establish a deposit account with the city to cover these fees. The Petitioner Deposit Account/Acknowledgement of Financial Responsibility form is attached to this document and must be submitted with the application. ' 0 Plan Council Applicant must present the proposed plan to the Plan Council. The Plan Council meets on the 2nd and 4th Thursday of the month. The members of the Council include the Community Development Director, City Engineer, the Building Department Official, the Public Works Director, the Director of Parks and Recreation, a Fire Department Representative, and a Police Department Representative. Upon recommendation by the Plan Council, applicant will move forward to the Plan Commission hearing. Plan Commission Applicant will attend a public hearing conducted by the Plan Commission. The Plan Commission meets on the 2nd Wednesday of the Month at 7:OOpm. Notice will be placed in the Kendall County Record by the United City of Yorkville. The Plan Commission will conduct a public hearing on the request, tape public comments, discuss the request, and make a recommendation to City Council. 3 Application • Step Economic Development Committee Applicant must present the proposed plan to the Economic Development Committee. Economic Development Committee meets at 7:00 p.m. on the 1st Tuesday of each month. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations prior to full City Council considerations and provide informal feedback The Economic Development Committee will submit its recommendation to Cit Council. City Council Applicant must present the proposed plan to the City Council. The City Council meets the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays of every month at 7:00 p.m. in the Yorkville City Hall Council Chambers. The proposal will be discussed at the City Council hearing where formal voting takes place. City Council will make the final approval of the plan. Final Plat Recording Once the final plat is approved by the City Council and all required documents, bonds, and letters of credit are submitted to the city, the final plat must be recorded with Kendall County. Submit the final plat mylar to the Deputy Clerk for signatures. When all city signatures are in place, the developer or his surveyor may take the mylar to the Kendall County Clerk for their signature. The next step is to have six (6) paper prints made and return to the Kendall County Recorder's office for recording. Kendall County requires the mylar and 4 paper copies. The City of Yorkville requires that you submit 2 recorded paper copies to the Deputy Cleric. Dormant • • • The Community Development Director shall determine if an application meets or fails to meet the requirements stated above. If the Director determines that the application is incomplete it will become dormant under these circumstances: The applicant has been notified of such deficiencies and has not responded or provided a time line for completing the application within ninety (90) days from the time of notification. The applicant has not responded in writing to a request for information or documentation from the initial plan commission review within six (6) months from the date of that request. The applicant has not responded to a request for legal or engineering deposit replenishment for city incurred costs and fees within ninety (90) days from the date of the request. If the Community Development Director has sent the required notice and the applicant has not withdrawn their application or brought it into compliance, then the director shall terminate the application. After termination, the application shall not be reconsidered except after the filing of a completely new application. Withdrawal or termination of an application shall not affect the applicant's responsibility for payment of any costs and fees, or any other outstanding debt owed to the city. The balance of any funds deposited with the city that is not needed to pay for costs and fees shall be returned to the applicant. (Ord. 2011 -34, 7-26-2011) 4 `CEO CIP United City of Yorkville 2 a 0 800 Game Farm Road T Yorkville, Illinois 60560 esx , 1838 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 � y INVOICE & WORKSHEET 4E ��� PETITION APPLICATION CONTACT: DEVELOPMENT/ PROPERTY: John and Michelle Stewart Ashley Pointe 3870 N IL Route 71 Acreage: 110.54 Sheridan, IL 60551 Date: 6/28/2013 Concept Plan Review: [ I Yes .. No $ OM Engineering Plan Review Deposit of$500 due Amendment I I Yes .h No $ 0.00 $500.00 Fee due for each: (Annexation) (Plan) (Plat) (PUD) Annexation: [ I Yes Yq No $ 0.00 $250.00, plus $10/acre for each acre over 5. # ofacres: - 5 = x $10 = + $250 Rezoning• I I Yes M No $ 0.00 $200.00, plus $10/acre for each acre over 5. # ofacres: - 5 = x $10 = + $200 If annexing and rezoning, charge only I per acre fee. If rezoning to a PUD, charge PUD Development Fee- not Rezoning Fee. Special Use: [ ] Yes M No $ 0.00 $250.00, plus $10/acre for each acre over 5. # ofacres: - 5 = x $10 = + $250 Zoning Variance: $85.00 11 Yes W No $ 0.00 Outside Consultants deposit of$500.00 due Preliminary Plan Fee: $500.00 11 Yes PQ No $ 0.00 P.U.D. Fee: $500.00 I j Yes No $ 0.00 Final Plat Fee: $500.00f Yes I I No $ 500.00 Engineering Plan Review Deposit: [ J Yes �4 No $ 0.00 [ ] Less than 1 acre = $1,000 due [ I Over I acre and less than 10 acres = $2,500 due [ I Over 10 acres and less than 40 acres = $5,000 due [ ] Over 40 acres and less than 100 acres = $10,000 due [ J Over 100 acres = $20,000 due Outside Consultants Deposit [ I Yes )d No $ 0.00 Legal, Land Planner, Zoning Coordinator, Environmental Services Annexation Subdivision Rezoninr and Special Use: I J Less than 2 acres = $1,000 due [ J Over 2 acres and less than 10 acres = $2,500 due [ ] Over 10 acres = $5,000 due TOTAL AMOUNT DUE: $ 500 . 00 WcaW O DrW Dev.Dep. ARO/ Fee Shect Wkst 5 Application STAFF USE ONLY Date of Submission PC# Development Name Applicant Information Name ofApplicant(s) I John and Michelle Stewart Business Address 13870 N IL Route 71 City I Sheridan State IL ZIP 60551 Business Phone 815-695-5667 Business Fax 815-695-5770 Business Cell 630-768-0412 Business E-mail michelle spirit arms.corn Property • • Property Street Address 17525 Ashley Road, Yorkville, IL 60 5 Property Existing Zoning I R-2 Property Total Acreage 0.54 Type of Request: ❑ Preliminary Plan ❑ Final Plat ❑✓ Ammended Preliminary Plan ❑✓ Ammended Final Plat Attachments Applicant must attach a legal description of the property to this application and title it as "Exhibit A". Additional • r • Attorney Name I John Philipchuck Address 1123 Water St, PO Box 565 City I Naperville State IL ZIP Fm5n Phone 630-355-5800 Fax 630-355-5976 E-mail jfp @dbcw.com 6 Application • ; Final Plat Additional • Information Engineer Name [ David C u tz, ., HR Green Address 1651 rairie lJoinFe, Suite City I Yorkville State IL ZIP - - - Phone Fax E-mail sc u z rgreen.com Land Planner/Surveyor Name I Bernie Bauer, HR Green Address 1651 Prairie Pointe, Suite 201 City lYorkville State IL zip 60560 Phone 630-553-7560 Fax 630-553-7646 E-mail Agreement r I verify that all the information in this application is true to the best of my laiowledge. I understand and accept all requirements and fees as outlined as well as any incurred administrative and planning consultant fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. I understand all of the information presented in this document and understand that if an application becomes dormant it is through my own fault and I must therefore follow the requirements outlined above. App ica t igna re Date 6-28-2013 THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED PLEASE NOTARIZE IN THE SPACE BELOW: P h i OFFXQkS_E-4 MLUE M MARKO ,age C/py United City of Yorkville ,_ oT County Seat of Kendall County petitioner Deposit Account / ' d 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, Acknowledgment of Financial � � m Telephone: 630-553-453-4 350 Fax: Website: www.york vllleil.us Responsibility Development/Property Address: Project No.: Fos CITY UsE ONLY Fund Account No.: FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition/Approval Type: check appropriate box(es) of approval requested ❑ Concept Plan Review ❑ Amendment (Text) (Annexation) (Plat) ❑ Annexation ❑ Rezoning ❑ Special Use ❑ Mile and Ya Review ❑ Zoning Variance ❑ Preliminary Plan ❑ Final Plans ❑ P.U.D. 8 Final Plat Petitioner Deposit Account Fund: It is the policy of the United City of Yorkville to require any petitioner seeking approval on a project or entitlement request to establish a Petitioner Deposit Account Fund to cover all actual expenses occurred as a result of processing such applications and requests. Typical requests requiring the establishment of a Petitioner Deposit Account Fund include, but are not limited to, plan review of development approvals/engineering permits. Deposit account funds may also be used to cover costs for services related to legal fees, engineering and other plan reviews, processing of other governmental applications, recording fees and other outside coordination and consulting fees. Each fund account is established with an initial deposit based upon the estimated cost for services provided in the INVOICE & WORKSHEET PETITION APPLICATION. This initial deposit is drawn against to pay for these services related to the project or request. Periodically throughout the project review/approval process, the Financially Responsible Party will receive an invoice reflecting the charges made against the account. At any time the balance of the fund account fall below ten percent (10%) of the original deposit amount, the Financially Responsible Party will receive an invoice requesting additional funds equal to one-hundred percent (100%) of the initial deposit if subsequent reviews/fees related to the project are required. In the event that a deposit account is not immediately replenished, review by the administrative staff, consultants, boards and commissions - may be suspended until the account is fully replenished. If additional funds remain in the deposit account at the completion of the project, the city will refund the balance to the Financially Responsible Party. A written request must be submitted by the Financially Responsible Party to the city by the 15th of the month in order for the refund check to be processed and distributed by the 15th of the following month. All refund checks will be made payable to the Financially Responsible Party and mailed to the address provided when the account was established. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Name/Company Name: Address: City: State: Zip Code: John/Michelle Stewart 3870 N IL 71 Sheridan IL 60551 e}ephp95-5667 MO 768-0412 iM-695-5770 michelle�spiritfarms. Financially Responsible Party: I acknowledge and understand that as the Financially Responsible Party, expenses may exceed the estimated initial deposit and, when requested by the United City of Yorkville, I will provide additional funds to maintain the required account balance. Further, the sale or other disposition of the property does not relieve the individual or Company/Corporation of their obligation to maintain a positive balance in the fund account, unless the United City of Yorkville approves a Change of Responsible Party and transfer of funds. Should the account go into deficit, all City work may stop until the requested replenishment deposit is received. Print Name: John/Mich Ile tewart Title: Owners Signature*: ' Date: 6/28/2013 C -� *The name of he individual and the person who signs this declaration must be the same. If ¢ corporation is listed, a corporate of ecer must sign the declaration (President, Vice-President, Chairman, Secretary or Treasurer) FOR CITY USE ONLY ACCOUNT CLOSURE AUTHORIZATION: Date Requested: - ❑ Completed ❑ Inactive Print Name: ❑ Withdrawn ❑ Collections Signature: ❑ Other DEPARTMENT ROUNTING FOR AUTHORIZATION: ❑ Comm Dev. ❑ Building ❑ Engineering ❑ Finance ❑ Admin. 10 Ordinance No. 2013- AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,APPROVING THE RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 358 OF THE PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT 1 FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION (YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SUBDIVISION) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the "City") is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, John and Michelle Stewart (the "Petitioner") have filed an application and petition for approval of the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision for the subdivision of Lot 358 in Prestwick of Yorkville, Unit 1, an approximately 32 acre property for a private high school; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission convened and held a public hearing on the 25th day of July, 2013, to consider the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision after publication of notice and notice to property owners within five hundred (500) feet of the Subject Property; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission reviewed the standards set forth in Chapter 3 and 4 of Title 11 of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance and made a recommendation to the Mayor and City Council ("the Corporate Authorities") for approval of the subdivision and the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2: That the Corporate Authorities hereby approve the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision, prepared by HR Green dated August 6, 2013, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A; with such amendments as are required pursuant to the City Engineer's letter dated September 5, 2013, items 60 thru 63 inclusive attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B; and authorize the Mayor, City Clerk, City Administrator and City Engineer to execute said Plat. Section 3: The City Clerk is hereby authorized pursuant to Section 11-2-3.H of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance to file a copy of this ordinance and Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision with the Kendall County Recorder of Deeds within 30 days from the date of the approval of this Ordinance. Section 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Ordinance No.2013- Page 1 Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this day of A.D. 2013. CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS DIANE TEELING KEN KOCH JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI CARLO COLOSIMO JOEL FRIEDERS CHRIS FUNKHOUSER LARRY KOT Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this day of 2013. MAYOR Ordinance No.2013- Page 2 FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISIONA , GRAPH° SCALE YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SUBDIVISION °"'"W "NDS PLS,°"TUTttB BERNARD 3 BANDS P.LS•W0.ECT AWIEIAP 830-15J-i560 A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 38 NORTH RANGE 7 {W366T1 IL EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 358 IN E woh a BO L=39.zi•RasA9 r PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION, UNIT 1, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, 1°5 / _ o GN)ERLINE C&-X89' 1'E CH=35.%' ]A KENDALL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, H,LII`IOIS 106 BOUNDARY LINE i u T3 ei 5&•35'3TE 1333' �N/IC. O - RIGHT OF WAY LINE Tz m cezF�AF/R�� m] LOT LINE 'S W, SULLIVAN RUINING SE]BALK LINE 2_ \ B $.qF Dy \ - EASEMENT WE L=142.0] 465A•V1 °YB OUr /( i° aT°ym too DENOTESPREAHEREBY°EOIGa P k `� C \ O' ' -- TOTIEIINREOCIry OFYORKNLLE to CB=tRO•3543'E CH- 0.38' 9,p '94/ 3. N� W FOR PUBl1CWGNT-0FWAY. to s9 e \ Fermi\ fi ^ '0.ar SElLdKKE2MMVNWT ` T.11., ' BZB•A • OENOTE55B•IRONRODSET a'e 'RP5"45'48'F Ai GgWER y�ft�, 5] � / � O DENOTES 56'IRON RODSEL w8°f 5a w I I � 83� `�� a z $I ey r`` s�a>.�5• 2.$ assI^ q ,ryX '3EE NOTE9 6g '^ _ BODY 4wua9..-- zF 60 'ir°nre.0'v�va°D.rrto T'F Pa�Po.s 5TX LOT2 I W c>7 '\ s r>za 11x85 " N1.n11 SR M 2 O `H�. 5 ra0'Raw HWEBY Um Ho \ r A 111.65 4528E 5512 Al 6i s 'O 9 � J �y,j w n F 16M'�\ S6103''4 1 �T. SY.E B q'W S ("�f LLl - N �- TO BE LWLLYEO TO BEHO:A 444FFFjYI Q p sarorre/ \\ FINK & .8,', E a \ A'E%/IHTx0.0®:'U A�.vho 3sa�__ ',o•.v- zas .saenmwer SH..."'E lS.m• 3 N m 'HwE°vµant------'- LxNRZL I aa.o'a.aw HraEeroEIF ]EO G: _°c a'1oM'� NNWNYW..E -r-- YWtA4rt0 Ia0'P.abo.E.1 li n \\y L GYAN IFD °• 10.0'P.UAD.E L 357 HEREBY WA420 to /dM dL1=dC u0. HLY£BY GPANIEV I Ih ° d ACREAGE ;' LOT 1 31.61 Uc. 1. & IM'°rn LOT 2 ETENRW&OPEN SPACE 554 ° N m R.QW.HEREBY O£0/CgTEO 6.48 ac. 1 te1Hp^° J 10.0'P.U6L.E , J p TOTAL GROSS ACRES xWWr GaANIEo SSSggq��T J �j J RTESrAN.I PW IN R_ BM OIO NI622 1 1. ANNOTARON ABBRENARMS- u,•° °x ^"rte rnIT R.E. 1 .z�10 Qf S BSC=BUILDING SETBACK DINE ,o^ 3'^ S zd HEREBY ce R \ PM=PUNT OF BEGINNING a uJ^I°^�i 1 I \ t P.U. &D.E. =PUBLIC UNUTY&DRAINAGE EASEMENT m \!� \ N SM.E=STU]MWATEB MANAGEMENT EASEMENT H. S I 11\ iL w� Q fy O o D.A. =HO&WOUNERS ASSOGARON 2. THIS PROPERTY IS WRAN THE CORPORATE LIMNS BE WE h e 518' M of S SET 0A I I LOT 1 i\��' I b 5 OWE MSEL RODS SET®AN EXTERIOR CORNERS UNLESS 1.3]..1351 BE. TA O INTERIOR SE RNED. 5/8" 12 M RWS RILL DUSET AT ALL SL612 AG DIMENSIONS CORNERS CURVES l2 MONTHS OF RECOS UNLESS Y A DIMENSKWS AGWC CURVES ARE ARC DISTANCES UN(E55 T ° OTHERMSE NOTED. 3 I 'U'o• 3]6°1'15'5x11' C I fL{ A m 5 NO DIMENSIONS SHALL BE ASSUMED BY SCALING. C z� �u ° 6. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE BASED ON A LOCAL N /� 3$j S COORDINATE SYSTEM. re.aw 1. LOT 2TD BE CONVEYED TD ME HOME OWENS ASSOCIARONS 10.0'PUtraE r��` `.+,xWWV0.2VLa/£O I� w RE"PRESTRTGK OF YORKNLGE. r HW,'EN..-AN. _ a I = O 8. OPEN SPACE TO BE OWED AND MAINTNNED BY HUAEORNERS I° S6r1g21T' rsxa ° 40'00• I -E 9. PUBLCAUBUTY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND STCRMWAVER too MANAGEMENT EASEMENT GRANTED OVER LOT 356 IN °,� 1 �. ii `Y It w Lf•T3°'^ j ,,1 o PRESTRiCK OF FORKRLL£, UNIT 1, PER DOCUMENT I 1 mar T4dh 460'N.a W. 200600035281 ARE HEREBY VACATED AND ABROGAIE0. I°" I ° N01.32NOW HWWV aw['Alm IF�-I la A PUBLIC URUTY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND STORMWA]ER I � �, e 3 'Do" ]4.66' W ~) O X01°2B10'W N R.� MANAGEMENT EASEMENT ARE HEREBY GRANTED IO]NE WE Sol'32'4VE O UNISON CITY D LV' IS RHLGE OVER ALL IT Of LOT 2 F� i' L-J2.68'R=25.M' ,%�' nl ` rWxa r'mall PIPE 68.0'R.O W.NWEFY CEpG Rn U CB=S31'OB'S1_E CH_31.68' IL EXISRNC ZONING IS R-1(UNITED CITY OF YQRKNLLE) / .Bu"o.E ry Ar awxra NN A o'Ro _- 1 // H[)usY wM'rz0 LK19.2P R=2)i.OP U to {I�° .. Ea9'W'a2'W 3JOS01' -.- ---- C0-N43'3237'E 6H=35.38' '1R P {L/Ty11 L=62.69.0.20.OV m O O 1\ / ^ATZ / C0465.4P20'E C{CE259• 4" g z9 8 1 i0.0'F.0.K o Ir, 8�n''. HW®r°c MW m A A. a N U.NY'RW 2WOY'E 10.0 ,y NBB'32'3fi EJ50� wTacATlwT ry wcx PwE PW \ 'P.u" ° / /e'M1�r'8` <.r MUS F 0 nauumr 2°loorole.T29 \ /ao•P.uzaE NEFE8Y 4RANRO =� Ey6]'3/✓rS RG r'a=JSaoAoNG D HWEBY�AFIN J13 e>' �IHI�2'16�j51�ta0'P.a@aF. 'ry0y4y5 H=1111 159.6¢• \ y-a xcxWr GaANIED�' � - _--_ WEar w.w]W :eP6 WAY ve32'JZ'I .AerT aErE uwluuerlr i�f E �r' 3a 0'aSL / // 60' BBB'3236'W BVe IS ONE IN<N M1 PREPARED ON c \ �OS°°i8j� ` I''3d�c'=189 - r / /i / Js°' OrEt.oFAwtxrs PREPARED BY: o C. ' R�IUJ3vo' sA.cs• R - L=39.2]'R=26.W _ CC=N°a'IJ'2o"E cH=28OJ� �G 90 CBWA6'2]'23'W CN=15.38 , ,.cyRY� IF ALIT ONE YrcH. FOR REVIEW w q w L-22.00R=9HNN =a_a,,' D 6G BnSW F(y 3J �U'��9' -��- X¢00951"E 2/J'9A'- L=2]2.00'R=96].00' MuS° / .53307.19 L=112.32 Rt165.W' y hzz OhsO \ OB=SBB'13'20•W CH=271.11' TANG�YLIY - Li3AO ZT00.`` Gt\ CB=N63.055IW CH=11192' n µPRO.4II A111F BERNARD J.BAUER o �_ �" 1�MR BERNARD PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No.3799 'Lr6• _ Na3°43'N"N 2682y o0'2 L=29A3 N=25.oV sae°32'32'W UC£NSE EXPIRES, N&LAND seo'o551'W VA'A` CO'S6T N.NE°ID'A6W CH-pV 4003 M .wa xo 88130135 `v Lam' 660're.a..NF 1°EWCA]ED ¢° AT /aW PIPE 3NEEf Ai GYAU'tR a S13 11:14:24 AIA 0.\88130135\Surve\Ow s\FP-8813135-Yovlle_CRrisoti5c8°oLAwg y�10 '49 FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION PINS: PT. 05-10-200-007 YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SUBDIVISION 05-10-277-001 A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 358 IN € 5I"lE OF PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION, UNIT 1, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, In /eTCPeIKY'S 2@TF.I:ATE KENDALL TOIWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS QS MIS 15 TO aRn£Y MAT STA2I ALM S ) ARE ME SHRIMP OF ME PROPERTY C£SINIBED W ME FOOLANDC WmERIPR'S Mann"IT,AND )55 0 HAW CAUSED ME SAVE IS BE SWIEWC. SULDWEB, AND PUTI£B AS WOW WHOM TO ME ONETY O'KEWALL) USED AND PURPOSES NOW SET FORM AS AWARD NO FROWBES FM BY STAMM NO 00 F46eYwi /f Fp7V{"X]4$ MIS WS).SVMdi N0. WAS Fl(ID FIR REEVES IN ME rc u MALAY AMMINEAGE AND AI PT ME MME MINE ME STIFF NO ARE nNFEW WgG1II4 ME UNOdS NLFLRY DEEM AF FM MONO UY THE LINOS SHOW W MIS PEAT FM A COMMU ICA £ASELIdT FOR SdNNO ER SUDMN AIN IMO IED I PRO°ERTT XIM EIECN. IC RELgROW'S qil¢ OF Kw4U1 CW/NTM, ttLNaS ANTI -IMVMCAnW SEANCE F R DETROIT HEART WE S iCR ANTI AW ONN NI d MOPWdfME; SR. EE]$ ALLEYS AND PUdM SEANCE$ AND HEREBY ALSO WOONV£S WE ANY CYJY FLA/V L SqV QYT!-X%ATE (MS _ DAY d' 20� Ai O'pOX �M. ElECMM CA; MI ANERE MME N GR OMd IEIELYMLMUNIG IMPS COMPANY PROBE FRAPEasw 4VMMM'MEBM MAW COMPANY, NORMAN MWaS o.ka OWNS BELL MEPNOW TOMMY. w MWER& F IOM ME VARIED OFF OF NOTIO! E MDR SOCOSPIRS AND ASWAr£ ME EASEMENT SIAM£ WttUNdS J WWFF$ S FRONSONS HOW ME STATED HEREW'. J SS LOW RA VECFK UCEHSEES SVLCESSOPS AND ASSONS, YMNILY AN SENRALLY M ONSAW4 Wp LWIID" d'XENDALLJ WEVIE REPALR, MAWIAW. MOTS MONSIMVCT EPAEE SWIFLOONT ALONOIIF NO KENDALL COUNTY ficrowR ME WIOERWMD YARDED? q>LMY AN> ALL d' ME DISTRICT CT 115 IN MIS PGT LIES NIADN REMOM QXAF DARE )O ME PIXE$ WYS N2HWS NL9E$ CABLE; CWWII£ MAMME£ ME BOUNDARIES Cf 1lKKNLLE LWMNIIIY(MT SWIX% NSTRMF )/S HASR0YE0 ANTI ACLYP1tB BY ME PLOP WNMISSICW CF ME UN/IED CITY 6 YORKNLLE PLNd; ITAWSWN£R$ MAYBIAL$ WANCE t NED/EJS ER TIMER FACILITIES USED W CONNECTION MM (p m DAIW AT MS_ OAYLV' 20� HAS-DAY OF 20� lµOwp 9 TOWNESSKK' INS IMMMUnW OF MECIRKtry NNMUMGINMES SOUNDS ANTI SWAS IN, Ol£Q UKDER, AMID NOW AND LOW M£ SVRPACE OF ME PRWdTY SHOW q�` � ��rd� MMM ME DAMIN OR DOMED UAES (w ibn9w dMOnanm) W ME PuT AND MARKED B1' "FASENOW. vnuTY MOINAY. 'PUBLIC MuT> COMMENTS SNUG' (w '1,1w BeSORNAMA ME sAIE q'9l/Ngs ) IN POW NTY D£SWAIED W ME OMAMMW OF MgOMWMI ANO/W WL MIS PIAF AS 'CWMOV SS WAWMNI ELWdR ANO ME PREPERIY BERNARD W 1M FIAT AS '"MON AREA 4P MEANT NO WE CWNIY a"KINOALLJ) BI: AMPwtt DEEMBES W ME FLAT fW SWEET AND ALLEYS HHEMER PUBLIC W PRIVARC IMEMFR MM ME PoW( M WS ALL REMIND SEANCE WMISIOVS WIO R WE SEMI CE OF THIS 1S TD WARY MAT l IAWAW 3 BAVER, EMUS AME54WAE LANG SARYEIUR NO GW LOT AW MAY" ALFA BE AREAS TO MAW ABROYEM ITS RANEW, OV W AEONCwt OJS-.3I9R AT ME EE*Ms! IY N2 OXl/d(5) MALw, HAW SY/RL£IID. BummIS0 NO _ LM$ AND COWCH ARM BE AREA; ME TOPIC TO WT. IOM W BFMW£ THEE$ BUSY$ ROOM pAT1ID ME FIXLONWC OETCR/BED PRMdM l�TA2Y 2�TFi(.`ATE LMAT3SJRA TQ'Z.S A SAPLINGS AND TO TED WSMU S FROM ME NRfACf AW SAWATAC£ AS MAY BE SIAIE a' ) STATE W RUMP'S J REASONABLY REWIRES wmMr M ME BERN turaw a".. NO ME mwr TO dRR WOV PART LP EAST HAW OF SEGMW IQ MWNW 36 NORM RMLN ] MST a" ME MFO ME SPEOMOOB INCOMITY FW ALL SMH MANN ES PRNAFE WSMVCPNS WALL NOT OF PRINCIPAL Hd/aAN. NOW MM LOT 356 W PRESMIpI OF 1W OLOE WT I. ACCORDING M ME SS ) SS PLACED OLER 4RANMES' FAMILIES W W. OWN W ONCE ME PROPERTY WOO ME DASWO W p T MEV£6. ROCIAN D MM W 315E 2" AS WCVNWT INMBd 2OWASM2B> CESTMBD IN ONINry CF ) LCVNrva-KEIIOALU DOTTEDWES (w eunzw BVynoilm) W ME PLAT AND MARKED TARAIwY. vnum GRMWr, AS TOWNS f AEPFOND ANO AA'EpTED BY DOE CITY ADMMSR. ATM OF INS WED CITY a' ICRKNLLE 'PUBIC MNTY GYMwY P.UE' (w ¢mOw Oes' lDwA NIMWT ME POIOT MOVED WOONT IMPNOWC AT ME NMMEASF CMNd OF ME SWMFASF WAVER EF SW YCRW IQ HOTARY PUBLIC W AND FW IuMd$ DDS—AY 0E 20_ BY ME 6RAYME£ AFHW INSIAWWAY a' ANY ONTO FFAOLEM AN SENSE W D2 SEPOWIN AMEX SLOW OI D£YREE 27 MOVIES 28 WOODS MST 20266 TFET NOW ME FAST LINE BY m FRCPENTY SHALL NOT BE MIEPEO 1N A MARTIN AS M ATTEM IC HIM WE AMBED S4) SOUTHEAST (AMRER THENCE SWIM BE WELLS J2 MOVIES JT S£CaIOS MESA. 4MU ME SLAT£ AND COUNTY AfMFSNQ RANDY CERNfY MAT OYLB W AND MAOR ITEB MD£(F. FEEP. 1NENCE NLIP IKAES]FFL Y. J9D FEET. ALWC A NW-TANq]/IW. NFL£ M ME SAM M NO MINIMALLY KNOW M ME M BE ME SAME SHOW HANNC A NAMES W 25W Mt.. A WARD MAT BEARS WILD 46 DMAEFS 27 WOMEN IN NO P£RS'AMN CHOSE NARNOS) IS(ARE) NOMINATED M ME EOi mno BISOFMwT NYMBD ME TERM "NMMON E(EMwIS' EMbL HAW ME MEMNC SET O)MM FOR SOT/ REAM IN ME 2J WOODS AW ARM A WOO CS JSJB M A PONT OF DWDDMY' THENCE SWM BB - 2 ,g 'LMG4AftMW(YNYFRIYACT. NM2R 765 HOT 6SEA, AS AMEAD IOW DARE M DUE SMELTS 32 MNUES 3S &LEWIS NEST DOCENT TO EASY DISMISSED NAM 94.63 FEET TO A 5 BEFORE ME MIS DAY NM ACA ONIELGD ME EXEW IM OF ME ANNEXED FLAT AWES CITY AONM95IRA]OR POINT w WRYATIM MMCE NE52RLY, HEM FEET NOW A TANaNRN WAIT, M TIFF Iq vi ACCO MOINO WSMVMENTS FW WE 05 ANTI PURPOSES MEREST ST FWM AS HIS W CORM '"NOW AREA OR AREAS' IS OWNED AS A DT RAR(6 W AREA W ME REAL RIa1E VO WRK HANNC A RA4VSW JAS.W fEET A PLOPS MAT GEMS NWM BT OELVE£S + v N (HdXM )R) FR££ AND KKUMARY ACT. PRCPdA ME Bd61C1N USE ANTI ENAIMwi Ch' µM1YGI IS F£SIILt4D IN IIHIXE of AS AN W MOVIES 57 SECOND REST ANTI A NWO p' 111.92 MNA PPDT W FEITFEE WRYATWE a >on ,f) M W SVMADIY OWED IBM PARCELS BE ACAS MEIN ME FINLAND MACE SWM MODI. 29.E FEET ALWF A COMMON, EN M ME � SAME CORK - OFVELWHAT. EVEN Md/pl BEEN MAY BE OMERSEs DEMEAN➢ W ME FIAT BY TERMS LOW MILAN A MENTS W 2£00 FREE A NOW MAT BEARS WOO JI OECRRS 29 DOOMS 46 c Q o ANN WIOw NY HIND MID NM/RIAL SEAL MIS BAY BY TDB SHOWS HEST NO A WOW W 2>.J9 FE£t M A PONT OF REVERSE COMA)URE' ROME $` m e 8 AS "WROIS: b%IMW EILNAR: OPAL IDACE: 'WEN AEG: 'OWMW TRdMV: PMYOC: M IMALY. 34O2]FEET ALWCA IAWO VQ CURB TO ME THAI£ SAD SLOW MAW AIWAN c m NO '"VOW AREA' ME TERMS -COMMON AREA OR AREAS' ME, YYAWIW ENMw15' /NttWE W 33yM FEET. AWWO MAT GEMS SLOW 67 DEGREES M COLORS 28 SECWOS BEST AND A eyI - � G?Y GBd'S -':ATE REN PRa+dTY SURFACED NIM ONMOP MOLL AYS NO WAIKWAOT BUT MOVIES REAL WOO W 32568 FEET M A PQ'Ni CY TAN6ENCq MACE NE1PM Bl D£WEES 4J MOVIES 10 "a 4 = H c STATE WN//NOS ) AS APOY , REMR OCCWD AYABFNWI4 STRAW ESS d5).P'CTMSIAVCNRES WTI SMOMS NEST TANAEOF M LIST OESWIFD WRSC BA25 WET M A MAT OF WRMARAM. 0 - m" 2 AS A PQ'K PfRFNIKW PpN W MFTWIMX EWNMdi. MEMX BESRRLY. 272.00 � ALO'N A TANaNON SLOW M OIE IA7. MIS CAME HANNC A _ NOFMY PUBIC ) SS PLANS OF WIN EEEE A WOAD MAT DOW SHOW FB MpEES I3 MINUTES 20 YCdIFS MST µ' v M t CWNT/W KAONU ROW WHITE W EWBOES FILL BE IXW£ BY GYIN NES AT WS! OF ME ARAN @P/l0i ONNFR, ANN A WINE W 2II.N JEST TO A POINT CF >ANGMCN MdC£ SPEND BO DECREES 09 - M � 3 AMES KD ANTI ACCEPND BY ME TRAM AND CITY COUNCIL BY ME WRAP OFF OF NNWYUL UPON XIN/Id REWES I. )FS 51 Walass NEST TANGENT M CAST DESPIBFD LIMA£ 24594 FEET M A PONT OF _ 3 NI/Nd$ BY WJ.'NMYE Na AT A COMES HE10 1X15 _BAY WRYANRF. MOTE NOPMNES IERLY 571.20 � NOW A IAMENRAL CURVE M WE BONN Imo T 1 3 SENT COVE HAWS A RADVS OF JD.W FEET. A ENDED MAT SAW NOTE 50 COMES 41 CIXNJY C1EF..S (�TFK`dTE CF 20 AAEP CPAPAMP� MONIES CL SODS NEST AND A NWF O" SOJ]O FEET M A PENT W TAGVICY.' MwC£ ' A NW-IXpUSK GSEAIOT IS HFRfDY RE4RK0 fM AND WANRF M 9]C AMFRNEpC MAW. WRAP Of KIXEES JJ MINUTES 2J SECCWOS HFSC TANGENT M MST DESRIFD CORM ZMET SIAT£ M ALWC ) NET M A FINIT W NRYANRE: w1£ NWMMESIDEC JIM FEET AMC A BAMOnN ) SS ON D. WENSE OMO PIMUC U ILOMM ANTI WHEAT CF BELOW FRANCHISES IXAAND BY WRIT, M ME REEF SAM WOW HANNC A MANS OF ]TAW f . A WOO MAT BEARS WOO; aM/NTY IF Wm Ma) ME OFF W KRKNU£. MWdS AND THEW RES'ECOK SUCCESSORS AN ANGNS NOT" ME 15 BEATES 59 MWUNS 44 SECWFS NEST NM A CHEW 0' MZ57 RE( DOME HARM .MI Tyry aIItK MFRS NOW ON ME p1AT AS Y PQI UNITY IF ORNNAL6 FASEMdY (NMe MOIed P.V. AIDE) 6 M/AYIIfS 05 SM AIDS NEST, 114.10 FS£T MOK NCRMOLY 261.19 FEET, NCO A T =MY CLAM W KLNFML CpWry ILLOOM W HDDY TO COMMIXf OSIAU. RECONSTRUCT, REPAIR, OEMOM MALICE AW EEC, NATION ME NW-IANNAIRAL WOW IF WE ACOW MCA WRK HAVING A RADIUS OF J3£M FEET A WIND SOUP MAT ROM ARE NO DDNWdT ONERAL TARE$ NO WOO WOW Mrs W UNPAb MdA2 UIIdAG4WND MA45WSWW AW DISTRIBUTION SISNMS ANTI LIES W ER ME IMPACT THAT BEARS NORM OS DEME£S OF MOVES 56 BECOMES NEST ANTI A OFEW CY SHIT FEET M FORFaND TARE$ AND NO WE EMABIE I" SN£5 ACAWST AMY OF ME FACT OWNED W ME O" AE 'PIMIG NOW B 0.4NNN£ EASMOY OSLWNO HIMONT UMHAON M QWNWWE A SOUTHERLY LINE OF END PRESTNICK OF YWMEEE MAT 1: MACE SWM 75 WWCFS 45 FIAT HdEW DRANO l FIMMM O nF MAT l HAW REINED ALL SIANIWYJE£SW CA PI CAS DONS ELECTRIC LONE; CABLE IEWARIN EWE£ AND ALL NECESSARY FACILITIES MANE$ 45 SECOYOS EAST NWD SAID SAMEMY LAW MOO FEET M A MESTWLY ONE W QXINECRW NIM ME PUT Woll MAW. AWYMEN NT MOEM, IOCEMO NIM ME RIa1T OF ALCESTS MEFEM FOR ME PASaM6 NO MAI LOT IRA (ME ONLOHWO IJ COUPLES ME NOW RTE BEVERLY ANTI NWMEMY LINES OF T EWVMOF NECESSARY AND REWARD FOR SEW USES ANN PVRPoSES NO TaYRIFR HIM ME SW LOT JAB): THENCE NWIHFASIwLY. 14201 FEET. NOW A NW-dNIAINAL WOW MME 1. QWV UNDO MY HMO NO SEAL W WE CORNY (DOW AT YONAM LE NaIF M INSTALL REWIRED SCONCE CONNECTIONS IWNR ME SURFACE O' GW LOT M SdK MADE S" LtMK HANNC A N US W 285W FEET, A WMD MAT GEMS NWW 29 O THUS (Yn IMPROVEMENTS MENEW, J5 MWCW AS STWOS MST ADS A OWED EY IIDJS MET,' MANX HCftM 41 OE'GREES M ALLOWS MIS MlYW 20— ALLOWS 22 WOODS EASE MID f£ET.' MINCE NIM 44 0£WEES 37 MWMED 14 MOVED A NW-EXTU91£ MONODY IS N50 HEREBY RESERVED FI AND CANNED TO WE WILED p/Y SFAS O'MWdS ) OF MONK OWES M CdVSTMICT, INSTALL REWOURUCE REPAW REMOK MPIACE ANT EASE NS JS FEET M A PROOF, AAWRYW RA MINCE S ISO. J9.2] FEET EI Th A SS MSYCF FACILITIES iW ME WEEPTSSON AND D'S)RIBUnN W WATER, SFIM SERER£ SAMTARY TMR]1 nAI' NP' 'E M THE RNNI. SA/B Wfl1E RAMS A RAMS LF WHO iFR. A NWF MAT CIXMIY CY KOO"U) SEEMED NO EURIMTTT MTHLY ME AFAS OMAN W NN PUT AS 'WALE UIMFY & DRNWACE BEARS " DE B9 S£GR£ES 5] MI MI ES 14 VOLVOS EAST AND A IMPA W JS JS FEED MS 49 OWN H 0£WLES 37 MINUTE 14 XOWOS MEWS 154E AS D MERLE SHOW 49 6 NESS 49 ANIONS D ANTI ACCEPTED BY ME M")W ANF WYCWNTL W N2 UNITED pN CF VII:N(!E NECESSARY MCEMER IOM A WCO W ACCESS MODERN FOR 1HE PwSWN£L M'0 Eq/MMdT LAS& S 4B 3TOL D, TMA 10 BLIND FEEL' ONCE SWM 55 50 W 19 S MST 25 23 WED GWNTy aERX 2O NECfSSARY MO RCWIRD TOP WO USES AND MACROS EAST, BOW JEEP. MACE SWM 4 12 WO 04 CAST, 5O YCWOS MST 9AZJ R£C B1WTS NOT Ogy Cl' WO E SIt HOMES MMES JF ACASE /2 SYYM'OS EAST SAM FEET MERLE SWM M 62 ME A501E NAMES ANNE; AP£ HERESY GPNI ND ME E PAN M O W UPOV G E RWO NODN 11 HZ 23 SEED D GST, ORM 7 BO WRITE SAM BI OEIE£5 OJ AST 11965 IMEs £D iOP ME USES KEMP SET OHIO AN, ME MIAN LA WT WM I RDA01£ MY SECYY/FS GLEE NTH F££P. VOCE NIM ]] 0£IEES (6 EAST, 28 WED THEME GST. N965 �^ MLE£ SIFUSE ON LIMA RAMP HMIIN ME APGS MSGNq HI AS AN, Re NSIM AWO FEET MERLE NIMSJ 37 SESW 26 MSS, PE 46 OS SECONDS HEFT EAST. 119,65REEF. REBATES Z �y,ERf. TOW35FP {(G[M1YAY CfMRASSKY�£P MAYOR ORMNA[£ GSdOY NHICN WIdFIXF MM ME WVS]RVC INSTAL PqI RfCWS]AIMNW, .M OE(n4E£S J] LIMITS J] SECY#I05 UST. PESOS F£A' POLICE NWM 22 WGKES J9 ROME REMOVAL REPUCEMPIT MAWYMANtt AND QMMAW W MOO UAbdG1MVNO MINCES IJ S:CWOS EAST MINIFIED FFEA MINCE INMM IJ DElRF£S q0 MOVIES C6 5EdW4S y .^., STAFF OF REAMPT ) MMMISSOM MO DISTRIBUTED S ISNMS NO FACHIMM APPVRIwM'T THERMAL NO PEYMMdT LAST, LOST FEEL: MACE BOOM 64 COMES J5 MWFIFS J] OWWS GLEE IJJ22 FEET M H O ) SS BWIOWG£ STWORME$ W MFCNWS SHALL BE C)WHISA D 1N WI, I OVER ANY A PaNTW ONEONTA MDR SW,HGSNRLY. JIA54 YWC ALONG A TNWENMM CURK M O CpMryW KENMf V AREAS DISOMMO AS PUBLIC UnUIY & ORNNAR ASFMwY. WI SIION ARMS MAY FE USAF ME RGHT SW WRK HAWS A RAMS 1267.00 F . A WOPD NG> BARS SWM 50 H FI CAPTIVE; SOLIDS THEME WIOSMENG MN2WAY$ NO OMM REAR➢ AAMBEES MAT MACES 57 MOVIES O> SECONDS GS!NO AWED W 295 FEET M A SWMOLY WHOM m L 00 HEREBY CER NY MAT ALL MA FORS MIEDOUNIC TO ME (STY BaGL'w'S f TFM.ATE CO NOT WIMSNABLY INTGFWE RIM ME NEW HDEW DESCRIED W SUP IAE5,MCO OF AMMOM WN! T MOLE ONTO 72 DEI(ES 41 MOVIES 23 SYCMOS TV/11 NA MONDAY RELVNOd15 AS ANTIMBEF IN ME RWW WOS WVONINO FLATS AIXPND BY WE EAST NdM A SWMwLY ME OF SAO PRESMIO I YIKNUL UNIT L 68.E FEET WHITE co STATE W RLWOS ) ME (OCARANW AW USE W THE NIX/-IXSV9K GSHOi HERON ICED ANO BESRKD SPECIMEN 16197 FEET ALTO ANIXI-IMQNRN SLOW TO ME RACE SAID WOW MONG A V l COWIIY BOMB I NOOALL L1MOA INSWAR AS THEY POTAW ID WE NINFXED PLAT. HAW ) as 50 n2 NOW NAVD JADES BY EACH W MAW DOMES STALL DE OWE IN SHOP A MMHER CASES BY JSI W IWE.. A WIO MAT SEARS SWTH Of DEIE£S 01 )MOVIES 57 BECOME ASI. FmI BEEN COMPLIED NIM. OA)EO INS DAY OF 20— CD•I•FyW NOMALL) AS NOT TF WIdFERE HIM I PREMAIE ME MONT F HIM LAW WERER BY OTHER MID A MONO 1 16425 FEET TO A TINY OF FAN NCO,' MINCE ONTO 11 Of N �1 TROPES FAR NANO SUCH GSAIMS ME GRMEO ANN RESOMED N/E WOSSWF ANF MINV ES 44 SEMYOS NEST. TM'Q]It M LAST OESCRIBD HOW. 156,86 {F£T M A PgNJ W w DEVILLED W MAD GSEM EW BY WE AF01£ NAMED MOVES SINE BE NOW W SINN A CUMATUME MINCE SWRNFLY. JW M £FEE ALWF A T WWRAL MAW M ME WFK. SAM ( CITY fNPNEFR fap ME UNITED Or CE YD2tNUFF FO MARINER SO AS NOT Of &ENTIRE DIM, PAWNEE W DOWO µY TWORSAOV NM SLOW HAMS A EMUS W 46],N FEET AWO O MAT BARS SWM N BESIDES 30 NINUNS HARDSHIP MCHWAY NMMISSWEA WADY NM" MAT ME OWNED IMPHNNI MIS HAW BEM 005>AU£D I ME RESXRED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS ANF FACYOFES APWRNNPNt EITHER) EJ251WC INMIN ME GSOOTS IRO SDWOS G5T ANTI A WNO N JiS39 F£Et M A PdllT I IM'CalCl: MaILE SWM 2B F- o WMMNE pMIANRM HAS BEEN MW ED FUN N2WMMEFIX! LY ALL REWIRED IMPROVEMENTS MOO WOAD I R£CROS4D. NO FR ON OCOMAON W SAM EASEMOIS BY ME ADOV£ ECHEES is MNN/IES OJ Woups EAST, TAnOwn, M UST OESIIBE LINE 19511 FEET N A U] r , (P^ NAMES FORMS MALL CHOSE ANY CHM6E IN ICE I IMPAW I WMCE ME ORNATE PIXNJ I ammmE MONDE SWPWAY. Z6],40 F£EF. NOW A TMGENNAL (NEW M ME V FM FANF AT POOL LLE ILMOO MI5 DAY I� 2O— FRNOME PATRRNE CODE SAID WOW HALING A RMNS W JV M FEE&. A MEW MAT BARS SOUTH N BEWFES W 14 MINUTES 47 5£CWIOS EAST AND A WOO W T642] FEET M ARMY W RENRSE WFMA EE :r1 WARAMC_ ($TFM.AIE FOLLONINC MY HOW M BE PERFORMED BY WE FMNO OFF IF YWNNO£ W ME COMPOSE T HOME SW MALI. 4268 FEET. NOW A TANGENTIAL CI1RK M WE LA SRN CURK HANNC A O STAN W/f!/Nq' ITS EASEMENT OWNS THREW INTBWSAN TTY SHALL MI£ 110 NOFAPCYI NIM FIFINY M RAMS WTSN FEET. A NNF MAT MGRS SWM 31 CENEES FB MINUTES 54 MECUM MST S ) SURFACE AETMPAnON WTUCOF T NOTE LAIN TA ME INAMI W, REPAIR I AND A OWN W JZ60 FELT TO A PONT W CWPWNF WRYANRE THENCE EASNERLY 6269 W 1 V l IN SS FEPIANAF a, PA4Me T WED. WINE$ EE$ UWr ON SHRU6BERY PROVAE4 HONENR. FEET. NOW A WOMPTAL FLOW M ME WIFE SAN WRK MONO A RMUSW MISS FEEL. A L. OYWNW KADAIE) - Cy1y p1gNtlH MAT SAN p1Y SLAE W MANS TALLITHIM SAW MWEDINEK FORK SO BAOHLL NO WIO MAT BEARS SLOW M D£4Y£ES 45 MOVES 2F ECCOW3 EAST AND A CIWF A' 6259 E" WOW ALL MEMO LIMITED SO AS W RETAIN SAME ORARIMM TO CTD PATp1 ANY REI M A PONT OF IMSTION THEMEkNOMY 00 DOWNS N MMUEJ6 S£COVDMAST, 0 REGISTERED FRaESSWAL EWMa NO A4HALT I COWEVE SIIRFAM TO REMOK ALL EXCESS DENNIS NO ONCE, NO M RAW TIE IMNT M "$II FESRIBD RR FEEL A PgNT W YAMR4' TIKE MNA (I HIS ATTIMPEY) WBMIT ME TO^IXRAPMGC NO RNMLF STOOD ANTI, TO ME BEST MAINTENANCE AREA L A GENERALLY WORD AN NWXMAMME TXVMOW, NIMASNMY JY27 MM NOW A TANNTIAL WHY M ME LIFE SAO WANT HANDS A I�/S � I BAP KNOME E NO BEW WE DRAINAGE OF NRFACE WANES MIU Our BE WANTED BY EATON; q' 2SW FEET A WOW MAT SECS momm qJ DEIEES M COMES 37 WOODS EAST ICI I� ME CONSMUCMAV OF WS NBpNSCWW MY PMT W EEOP W, MAY IF DOW SURFACE AIM A WIND W JaW FEV TO A PONE W TANGENCY. SW MAW MOO DO A LI SOW FEET 11W/� NATO COMMIT HILL Be MMCD, RGSOVABLE PROVISIONS HAW BEd MATE FI ME NEST OF MID PARALLEL RIM ME EAST ONE BY SNIP SOUTHEAST WMT[F: HENCE NIM OI O MILLECIMV NO MATMEW CF SUM SURFACE WANTS INTO FOCUS ARCS I INNS NMM ME BEI2S 20 MINUTES 18 SCOOTS NEST NOW S40 FAMILY. ONE 8265 FEET' MFNR NWM WBaALS R HAS A ROM TO USE. NO MAT Npl S FACE WATERS MILL BE POOPED FOR IN 01 0.'LREES 32 YIM/NS }O SEL[M'OS µESE NOM A TIE 40.N F££f 11EY( !Y MO PARALLEL ACCORDANCE NIM GENERALLY ACTPNF NNOWMAIM PRACTICES SF AS M O£FME ME M CASEMENT IS Wolay FESWVED FAR AND SHADOW TO THE UNTIES pry w YOFKNLIE MF M RON WE EAST ONE 0' SM NWIXGST WANTED, 466 FEET M A SOUTHERLY AWE I SAID Fes. LIKELIHOOD OF DAMAGE TO WE AWNIMG PROPERTY BECAUSE a' ME CWSMVCIRW W WE NS SUCCERWS AND MoWE ONE NL I ME AREAS MARKED 'STWHWAON MANAGEMENT E;IMCK W ARMILLF, WT C MdCE NORM BB DOMPES 28 CLIMES I MCIOS EAST. q _ SVB OYW. ASMMY (e O v Nd NINE) W ME PAY TI ME PERPENN RIWF. mmuncE, AND NOW SAM SOPOWLY WIE QUOO FEET M SNO EAST LINE: MENCE SWM 01 CENEM 32 r , SUMWIry M CORKY. CWSM� FMOVSIMS& REPAW. 1NS^EGT UNMAN MO OsTAIE MINUES 40 SOMAS EAST ALTO SAN EAST LINE, 74AB FEET TO SAO PENT OF SEpNNIN4 AO IT.I O m DARN MI5 _ DAY BY 20� MOON WINES MD ME SMWNIACM MMANMI AREA ICE' REIN RPM My ANTI o IM ME MOO CITY 6F )WKN� NMFALL FFNOWIP. MWAL1 OWNry NWdS MD COV AINWF T�I'J, IV/tl NECESSARY MMHIXE£ CANYI BASE£ SNOBBY SEMEN$ WANE ; ,FlC N562 AWESWW/O MIEII£SS CWMVNICAMAY CABLE£ ttWNECO FIE aYWE$ SCONE$ MD MHER S,WCMWT ART °o AFFUVENMCES MAY RE SOMD NERSSMY BY SAN GAM ONE, LOW ALWA WbER MID ITOWN aRNFY WAY ME FLAT HDEI DRAW IS A COWFCT NO ACCURATE VPRESwTAFOV g TIME (I ONE AVWOM]£B AMIMT) RONSTNO FROWSOMPAL INCIDENT MRWN SEND INDICATED ASMwE MCEMd IM ME DENY CF ACCESS ASPECTS ME W SAW SUR KY M'0 SVBD'NLIXI. AU NSIMCES M£ 9IOMN OI V.S CORKY fFEi MF DEgMN KENDALL MI INIY R T W FARM STAIEMLNT PRCWD,Y FOR NMENANY MM NO EQUIPMENT TO CO MY I ME NOW NWK. TIE WNI IS pMiS MEREW. ALSO IVIED M WT MNN TRIM W RENOW MY MF£S SIMOS I FMER MAWS N WE z NONCE'. MMMIr MAT INTERRRE NIM ME (WEAPON OF STAFFS W OWN I MMO 40 PERMMMt KENDALL OWN HAS A LWO RED MANOTO IN AGOWLMFE AND SWLLAWS SHALL BE PEAK W $ED ANENT HO MM2 ME dMMHY I C FORMED CERTIFY MAT NO POPPY I ME ABOW AsOMAD MOCIRTY IS LOCAE) WIN A METOOM WE ROME MATINOWS OYIWFM M FUYW MMWD WE IIMWAFA AANANMT STIVOMPRES WED ME EASEMENT ARM WALL RE MME PoMWI SPELIM A" HAZARD AREA AS IDENTIFIED BY MF FEDERAL LMwNCY MNgNMIFAgNCY Wo SIC wMIOryW ME CCVNMY, PROPw TY MAT SVPPIIS MIS ENPRES NRNIFN CONSENT W FE CITY EmonFIR, BUT SANE MAY BE USED FI PUFPoYS MAT BASS W RIM MM N4 I]F93DI254 ELAINE M EFFECTIVE DAN OP TOMMY 4 . ALL Y IS M RATED BY A ZOVINO INDMATIE - A-1 I AO WECIAL DF NOT Md I LATER IMEMERE DIM ME NIESMO USES I DRAW USE MYWE CWSMICRNO A RESOEHCE I FACILIFY PA? MIS ]WMF AN ME PFCPdTM IS LWAIED IN ZIT, "X: ALAS 0£iFRMIND MBE W2D£ W PE 0,29 MOU B BE AWARE MAT NIMN AMCUMATI PRAC011S MAY RELIEF ME OMIR CY ME PRONG IY S1AU WIND ME OMCdI iW ME MNNDEMENT OF ME ANNUAL MMYE fLIXgP(AW. BLR IS VIE I'CH 01. W OLMSIPWAL EWLI WSI. SEND; War AND FEMME HENS BY MPMWMER MMANMI MA MD MWFIdM/LFS ME VNINO CITY LY CAMMIL£ HILL OFFlCOL DRAWINGS OFMARWS MST AW NO N PERFORM ONLY LIM NCY TRAWO ES AS DEdEO NEC£SSRY BY ME CITY WONE£R W WE O 1 - UMFEU CITY OF ttAPKNLIE / WITHIN COMITY WAY I HAW SET All EDIFIED COMEDY EXPONENTS RID DESCRIBED THETA IF NOT. ONE INCH. W MIS ANAL TAE AND MAT ALL WHOSE ARMAMENTS WALL BE SET AS OEWIRD BY AMV IF PLO E INCH, STATUE (AMENT AWLED STAN25 R9B9 tlAPNR POP MCDI IA / FOOMER C£RBFY MAT WE PK(LRTY SAND W WE %AT IMEW DAMN IS SMARM MOO DRA AI W. BJB ME VNNEU C11Y W OWKNU$ ITS WRLSON; MODULES MID ASLW£ ARE HERBY OVEN ME CYHIPIAM UNIS W ME FRIED Try a" QN WALL$ N➢Nd$ WON 15 OTECO IM THE Ap9REAN, TARE y EASEMENT RIGHTS ONCE ALL AREAS W ME FLAT MA9/:WO TDESNIM GSdOY. 'BASE MALL yZOA PoNAS MORMSN BY dN9W 12 W MOq£ 11 W NK MWCYS MVNILVN MSE AS 6 GSMOY, "PEDESM/M MO ONE MAE MCEWr ON NORMWAND MANAGEMENT EASOdY AMM(A B DAN: J2 2013 .- M CWSWUCT REHALL ROONSMUCT. F PAIR. BELOW REFINE XWELF. MAWIAW AND JOS PRO WIM135 'y (BAT, pEDAMIM AND aCME CAL$ PAVED FR WIPACED. FOP WE UM MO WONVENFW N WE NBAL %/9OG WE MOTE NMI➢ dMIES ARE HEREBY &RANTED ME WHY M LIFER SNN WAN MY MONO MID SEAL AT IMXNUE MWaS FMS DAY OF a LOW MOMENTS HAEO DESCRIBED FOR ME LOTS ROM MT FIRM NO WE MIT M WT. "IS NOT I REVOLT MY MME$ WOW NO CUBA FLOW NIMN ME G9JMENT AREAS HON, FOR REVIEW SHEET V DRAWN MAIM INM wM ME OWS]AUCnOV. WSTAILAON, REttWSTWOMMA REPAW, LO RENOIR, Rw1ANME INSECTW. MAW2YMM AND OPERATION IWAOF NO IPIPWARY ON F] OF /] 8/6/2013 11:14:24 NA PdMNIMT FfN1dNC$ SYNEMPLES I CBSTRUCHIS WALL RE PLAN W W FLFR MID BERNARD A DAVID G 2 NEASMMTS MAW IMIEV RE IBM WE RIME HEREON WMED. HLYMS PRAFESLIK LAW SMVEDR NO 4T5-3799 0:\88130135\Survey\Dwgs\FP-88130135-Yakville_Chnstim�Schoo)xwg MNM EmueAM)V DAM. 1WO 114 FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION W C-QEav coWACrsJ GRAPHIC SCALE DAVID W. SCHULTZ P.E, PROJECT MANAGER 630-753-7560 so 0 40 80 160 BERNARD J. BAUER P.L.S., PROJECT SURVEYOR 630-753-7560 A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH RANGE 7 z ( IN FEET ) 0 1 inch - T ft. EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AND A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 358 IN LEGEND o L-39.2`7' R-25.00' PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION, UNIT 1, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, - CENTERL/NE CB=N89°57'1 "E CH=35.36' KENDALL TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS BOUNDARY LINE ° j z S84°35'37"E 133.22' �•7/\ o 14' D� - - ��h .� RIGHT OF WAY LINE Ln �E F A�Q RVII, _ NIT I ,1, Ce-6's00 1/�/�Q�\ 107 LOT LINE � FS � ��'�o°° IGK �F p0�3528� `� rn o <.S°°s F �.9 iC �D ��`l,� 5� '�� 54 pRESTp C. 206 J ° 3735°�, BUILDING SETBACK LINE �� 0 8 A- F \ EASEMENT LINE S'Q9 70 ! �6'�y°�° 108 - - DENOTES AREA HEREBY DEDICATED L=142.07' =265.00' Q9,SQ, /' F5 , C °° =46.60' R=267.00' = TO THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CB=N29°35'43"E CH= 0.38' ��F �` \ q��q \ �'. 46.54' CB=S22°1 F �c14 FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. m 59 L=0.7458R=265.00' SSSst°°°' S \ OF� ;1. \ „ �' 7 92S � °ry 12�612A"E (0 23 E ° s • DENOTES 5/8 IRON ROD FOUND w 0 00' SET CONCRETE MONUMENT F \ \ / 2N N62� N�2 41 Q S75°4S4g„E AT CORNER vv Sg 9943 i rn LOT 109 j - O DENOTES 5/8" IRON ROD SET ° 145 p4sp \ o o o c9 13.306 S.F. F � I °• a °• M n LOT 356 � = o M = O 15,365 S.F. V N V "i c� U z v I 36 .91• �4, '�", �I o' W 0 r 31 °o N o I p I S62 S�2S ���° 358 1 A. `i h LOT 110 �' rn c�i ° 13,306 S, o SEE NOTE XX CC F W 11 s o J n wo 0p `� 65 .� LOT 3 �� J Cm11 zt J m It (-0 o U) po a� S, 712 l\Nc`l 6 cif 12,631 S.F. - U o ) C4 63°`'�?, S 100.1 �`'� LOT 2 W 1 Lu �* o N ° INu) a �� AREA FROM UNIT 1 TO BE 63• 68° S" ° ? N NT NT �� 30.0 `B.S.L. �9• 71' 241,111± S.F. \� Z m 70.0' R.O.W. HEREBY DEDICATED 3,; INCLUDED IN THIS FINAL PLAT 37F, 23" 11965'$ E '� C Q (o LOT 111 ) ii F 117.55' 5.54± AC. d m ct, 0 v °46'2 � �0 12.358 S.F. :ao < AREA=1 1 626 S.F 3868 S84°03'44"E N77 S.M.E. & OPEN SPACE J U) co U LOT 340 6' TO BE CONVEYED TO THE H.O.A. LOT 354 ���vvv `� Lq ` f 12,006 S.F. w 12,640 S.F. I L O O N (D E \ LOT 341 N z �L/ r . /► ° LOT 112 �_ cn O O LOT 275 S.F. 12.005 S.F. ° " cam- _ 12,000 S.F. Co U O O C) C 1x,187 .F _ N87-00'20"E S88 40 53 S88 00'08 E N04 45'16'E 13.20' NI" _ o a - Q AR A ROM UNIT 1BE- _ o �� INC DED I THIS FINAL PLAT nl�' 3 sss4o'S.�"s 5s�' - 88.65 85.8x' _ �• ° E LOT 353 _ o r' S83.43'lp" 84 LOTS REMOVED FROM - cYi EA�8,231 S.F 238.13' "PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE, UNIT 2" T 6 cs 30.0' B.S.L. 66.0' R.O.W. HEREBY DEDIC TED O i •- °s, �� r LOT 342 I LOT #'S 273 - LOT #'S 356 0- ° 12,011 S.F. \ \ I I I I W � O O � LOT 113 LO co >- CD LOT LOT 347 13,030 S.F N ,> \ LOT 345 120,73s.F. 12,017 S.F. I I LOT 348 I ° 12,084 S.F. LOT 349 \ LOT 344 \ 12,017 S.F. 12,000 S.F. LOT 350 10.0' P.U.&D.E. o^ 357 12,089 S.F. I I 12,000 S.F. LOT 351 HEREBY GRANTED rn � \ \ LOT 343 \ 12,011 S.F. � n 1 \ 33.0' LOT 337 12,584 S.F. I 000• C:) � 4 nVJ, 19,674 S.F. V/ � '�I O � ii �p II c9 13,299 S.F. n 10.0' P.U.&D.E. i ��- _ °o ti = LOT 114 , L LAND AREAS o 33.0' HEREBY GRAIyT q �. n U - ACREAGE LOT 1 31.61 ac. \ - �N o coo rn o UNSU6 0 LOT 2 RETENTION & OPEN SPACE 5.54 ac. �0 S, LOT 3S 6 _ _ i M M M R.O. W. HEREBY DEDICATED 6.48 ac. OJ�O o o \\ o M _ - - _ Z\� �� m CID LOT 115 m / , �� 13,299 S.F. TOTAL GROSS ACRES 43.62 ac. X� o _ LOT 277 / - - - �� m CD cn GOJ S < .n +2,544 S.F. / / � U r'� j REESTABLISHED PER IN R- DOC. 201000018327 LOT 335 LOT 326 LOT 325 LOT 324 < co M\M 12,871 S.F. 12,708 S.F. 3 N d co o 13,469 S.F. LOT 328 LOT 327 12,316 S.F. LOT 323 M 16,756 S.F. 13,194 S.F. 12,016 S.F. LOT 322 LOT 319 \ \ LOT 116 1 p 1 1. ANNOTATION ABBREVIATIONS - ,c� c� II 12,000 S.F. LOT 321 12,362 S.F. N BSL = BUILDING SETBACK LINE Lo 'J � �" -' II LOT 320 17,0x2 S.F.12,646 S.F. �\ ��°Co, POB = POINT OF BEGINNING I, m �' 1zOs8o2sF. 13.778 S.F. . °o. P.U. & D.E.. = PUBLIC UT/CITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT m S.M.E. = STORM WA TER MANAGEMENT EASEMENT U I I LOT 334 Nr' LOT 117 ' I 12,340 S.F. �° O H.O.A. = HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION I I \ N\ �s 12,000 S.F. / Nr'.� V O (~� 2. THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE I 1i0000 s9 �,• o�, ° _ �, 1) UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE. LOT 279 O Cn LOT 1 I N N J. 518" STEEL RODS SET ® ALL EXTERIOR CORNERS UNLESS I 12.776 s.F. I m I 1,376,835± S.F. T 312 ° / `O 11 o OTHERWISE NOTED. 518 STEEL RODS WILL BE SET AT ALL 31.61± A,C. .;,331 S.F. � �+ ` _ I I LOT 310 1` 'r' 13,811 S.F. LOT 314 I I LOT 318 �` / LOT 118 �� a INTERIOR CORNERS WITHIN 12 MONTHS OF RECORDATION. LOT 333 16,x28 S.F. ' 12,411 S.F. 12,000 S.F. 12,588 S.F. I 13,500 S.F. LOT 315 I LOT 316 4. DIMENSIONS ALONG CURVES ARE ARC DISTANCES UNLESS I O 12,728 S.F. I 13,054 S.F. LOT 317 OTHERWISE NOTED. M 33.0 C LOT 309 13,961 S.F. 5. NO DIMENSIONS SHALL BE ASSUMED BY SCALING. C I LOT 280 Z 16,2x6 S.F. I / rn o a 6. ALL BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ARE BASED ON A LOCAL (/) ( 12,000 S.F. O COORDINATE SYSTEM. c,,, „� • I - _ 66.0' R.0.W. 7. LOT 2 TO BE CONVEYED TO THE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS �`! N LOT 332 0 I '" - - _ _ _ r� HEREBY DEDICATED o `1 OF PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE. N Z N 12,000 S.F. 0 8. OPEN SPACE TO BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNERS `V I�' - o N ASSOCIATION. u W LOT 281 C _ gpYB �� - \ co lk 40.00' I r O T^ �, ,O 12,000 s.F. m - r q _ �, Z N88° 8'09"E v1 N 9. PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND STORMWA TER N D N - _ _ - _ S DRIVE U fll S MANAGEMENT EASEMENT GRANTED OVER LOT 358 IN � "�� "' LOT 331 - - - - 1 ' '� W UNSUBpIVIDEO � ["� (� PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE, UNIT 1, PER DOCUMENT r o 1• - 74.66' 40.0' R.O.W. N 200600035287 ARE HEREBY VACATED AND ABROGATED. z `" I 12,000 S.F. I I o°' I ° N01°32'40"W HEREBY DEDICATED 10. A PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND STORMWATER LOT 297 I I 82.65' I I 17,226 S.F. N ° ° 74.68' 1� O MANAGEMENT EASEMENT ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO THE THE I i nT')R� _ LOT 305 LOT 304 LOT 303 \ I N N01 26'18"W � N R � S01°32'40"E 12,824 S.F. 0) UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE OVER ALL OF LOT 2. LOT 306 12,773 S.F. 12,309 S.F. LOT 302 Mi -� „ L=42.68' R=25.00' �� co 66.0' R.0.W. HEREBY DEDICATED LOT 308 12,063 S.F. 12,055 S.F. LOT 301 LOT 298 07 CB-S31°08'54"E CH-37.68' '- 11 FOUND 1" IRON PIPE 0 11. EXISTING ZONING IS R-2 (UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE) 17,319 S.F. I 12,000 S.F. LOT 300 12,579 S.F. _ U - - - AT CORNER 12,148 S.F. LOT 299 10 1 LOT 330 S88 00'02"W 5308.07' L=7'-E R=25.00' z o ,N R� 16,942 S.F. o ' CB=N4�`��3237'E CH=35.36' LOT 296 L=62.69' R=315.00' w O ° 9 1 B rl) � \ _J3 14,0 - -- � CB=S85°45'20"E CH=62.58' co \ _ / -N / 70.0' R.0.W. o 1-4.977-S.F. LOT 307 �� 000�Qj HEREBY DEDICATED N SET CONCRETE MONUMENT � � 9 �' � � 12,993 S.F. o p� Q. ^.p N88°32'36"E 94.65' w 7n AT CORNER o FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD /N CONCRETE \ I 0 O ii 35.0' oo �v IN LOCAT/ON OF IRON PIPE PER / /4� ��(,� / t O o DOCUMENT 201000018329 / LOT 288 LOT 289 Q �� G, MUST N \ LOT 284 LOT 287 12,322 S.F. 12,421 S.F. LOT 290 4��` , e 742.yr� qNG 3 \ 14,993 S.F. / 14,979 S.F. 12,1x8 S.F. LOT 29'` LOT 295 y�h a� �/Vjg. R=350.00' \\\ / / - \ 12,000 "T X92 14,993 S.F ���V",) 48O1��V,7CH=141.43 159.68' N cl 30.0' B.S.L. F. 12000 S.F. LOT 294 , � Ik AY S883236" < LOT 286 I HEREBY GRANTED 14,754 S.F. G / •o SHIFT IN ACCESS LOT 285 / TO PROPERTY PREPARED ON ____ /O �so• `5�� 20,327 S.F. -N5S,1�a„ECH=Z8967` I / (,� S88-32'36"W 94.6 BAR Is ONE INCH ON 0 < ,9. �B- �- // 35.0' OFFICIAL DRAWINGS PREPARED BY: �, l ��s��,���,. .p\` / 290.57 R=1033.00 94.65' � L- �3 43'7� � o / 0°s,7�' s9'.p C'�6�OR\�' '5�"E- 2 �4 C8=N88.13'20"E CH=280.36' -6�5 �_ - L=39.27' R_25.00' 0 1"<11 �, rr 0, �� y� \ BNB - - 90 CB N46°27'23"W CH 35.36' pI�IpED IF NOT ONE INCH, 1' \ -L_281.28' R=1000.00' '�' S8343'10"�c 3�$' rp N, UNSUB ADJUST SCALE ACCORDINGLY FOR REFERENCE ONLY �s ��33 °os��8• \ __ - 243g4� 1 _ X86_25, / o o �_OT 260 C` app, Ng0'09 5� L=272.00' R=967.00' MUSTANG wq� _ r\ / %33 �.3�� CB=I 32' 5'57" 00' W Cg-S88 13'20"W CH=271.11' - LOT 12 CB=N83 05'57"W CH=111.92' ao' _ DRAWN BY: BJB 1,411 S.F. y� Z� G 14,477 APPROVED: MRF a BERNARD J. BAUER 503 - _ N83°43'10" L,3 00'26 �\ \ L=29.46' R=25.00' S88°32'32" N ' CD ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No. 3799 gyp' 243.g4' W 286'25' S6�° LICENSE EXPIRES: 11/30/14 S80°Og 51 W Cg- CB=S71°29'46"W CH=27.79' 40.0 ' ° JOB DATE: 07/2/13 V) IDED I 66.0' R.0.W. HEREBY DEDICATED LOT 124 \ JOB NO: 88130135 V) I I cJUeDIV LOT 140 13,843 S.F. �` UN 17,035 S.F. \ FOUND 1" IRON PIPE SHEET 1302151 S F. I I N R� A T CORNER LOT 170 '° EXHIBIT a_ 7/24/2013 4:49:04 PM 10 14 �. V) \\hrgyvnas\Data\88130135\CAD\Dwgs\Exhibits\88130135-Exhibit-for-mtg-2013-07-24.dwg X .......... EXISTING GRICULTURAL USE _-�--- ---- - PARK — i tIB11 1 IC IN EXIST. • PHA ETENTION BASIN , EXISTING AGRICULTURAL USE W old Z CC 7 � R . P SITE DATA: W v IA BUILDING FOOT PRI- (25,2DO±SQ. FLOOR A— (FAR) 0,0153 � �. U R s �� E h, EX ST. / \S H 1 . DETENT E 2 N �� r� r Q ." BASIN J :-. In PHASE EXISTING 1 --_ PARKING AGRICULTURAL USI KI \ FUTURE \^� P L��.i DETENTION "EXIST: BASIN DETENTION G(��� - BASIN-- - -- G � EXISTING AGRICULTURAL USE Y Engineering Enterprises, Inc. July 23, 2013 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 1 United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Dear Krysti: We are in receipt of the following documents prepared for Yorkville Christian School for the above referenced project: • Final Engineering Plans prepared by HR Green, stamped with a received date of July 5, 2013. • Final Plat of Subdivision Yorkville Christian School Subdivision prepared by HR Green, dated July 2, 2013 Our review of these plans is to generally determine their compliance with local ordinances and whether the improvements will conform to existing local systems and equipment. This review and our comments do not relieve the designer from his duties to conform to all required codes, regulations, and acceptable standards of engineering practice. Engineering Enterprises, Inc.'s review is not intended as an in-depth quality assurance review, we cannot and do not assume responsibility for design errors or omissions in the plans. As such, we offer the following comments: There are several items that will be required before we can recommend Final Engineering approval. Items that have yet to be submitted for review include: • Revised stormwater management report for the new land use; • Storm sewer sizing calculations; • Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for public improvements; • Revised traffic study; The following comments are based on a partial review of the plans. Road,52 Wheeler Sugar Grove, 60554 • 1) 466-6700 • 1 466-6701 fax— www.eeiw'• • Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble July 23, 2013 Page 2 of 4 FINAL ENGINEERING PLANS General 1. The cover sheet shall be dated and signed and sealed by a professional engineer. 2. The street name north of the school access drive is identified on the engineering plans as Mustang Way but identified on the plat as Whitekirk Lane. The street name shall be changed to Whitekirk Lane to match the plat. 3. The I.D.O.T. Standard Detail referenced in Note 12 of the specifications. Curb Ramps shall be changed to 424001-07 and the reference to a "Type "A"" ramp removed from the note since the detail no longer references a ramp type. 4. We recommend utility key note call outs be removed from the overall site plan and added to a utility sheet(s) and the plan and profile sheets. 5. If proposed utilities are shown on the site plan, existing utilities shall also be shown on the site plan. In addition, distinct line types for existing, proposed and future utilities should be included on the plans. 6. The key note tag labels in the legend as shown on the Overall Site Plan shall be reviewed and corrected for the proper utility. 7. Separate erosion control, utility, grading, landscape and lighting plans shall be prepared in addition to plan and profile sheets for the roadway and sanitary sewer installation. Typical Street Cross Sections/Specifications 8. There are a number of inconsistencies between the plans, specifications and the cross sections. They should be revised accordingly. 9. Placement of drainage and utility easements adjacent to the ROW for each roadway section shall be reviewed and revised accordingly and identified properly on the engineering plans and final plat. 10. Utilities are shown in the typical sections that do not appear on the plan views. The typical sections or plans are to be revised accordingly. 11. A typical section for Whitekirk Lane shall be added to the plans. Water Main 12. We recommend a reconfiguration of the proposed water system to serve the school. The water service shall be looped around the building and connected to the main at two locations. One connection to the east at Whitekirk Land and the other to the west at Pestwick/Mustang Way. We do not agree with the water service being installed between homes off of Callander Trail as proposed. Attached is a sketch of the suggested routing. Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble July 23, 2013 Page 3 of 4 13. A separate domestic water service is to be provided to the school and a fire department (Siamese) connection shown at the building. In addition a fire hydrant is to be within a certain distance from the siamese connection as specified by the fire department. 14. All public water mains are to be located within public ROW or in easements. Sanitary Sewer 15. IEPA Division of Water Pollution Control permit applications shall be submitted for review and approval since the proposed sanitary sewer discharge is anticipated to be in excess of 1,500 GPD 16. Engineering plans must be submitted to the Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District for review. Comments are to be forwarded to us upon receipt. 17. We question the need to extend the sanitary sewer service past the last connection with the building service. Is this necessary for future improvements or can this last segment be deleted. Drainage & Grading 18. The extent of the proposed grading shall be clarified. Currently proposed contours are running off of the sheet. All proposed grading shall be included on a plan sheet. Existing, proposed and or future contours/grades shall be distinguished from each other on the plans. 19. All accessible routes and accessible parking areas shall be check for conformance to ADA standards. 20. We will require an updated stormwater management report including pipe sizing calculations. Considerations must also be given during interim conditions to maintain positive drainage for all areas designated future development. 21. It is also our understanding that not all of the outlet storm sewer for Unit 1 has been constructed. The outlet storm sewer should be included with the school improvements. FINAL PLAT 22. On Lot 358, a number shall be added to the "See Note xx". 23. Easements will be required through the lot for the public water main and all storm sewer serving off-site areas. Alignments will be finalized as part of the final engineering submittal. 24. Ten foot Public Utility and Drainage Easements are to be provided adjacent to both sides of the road ROW for Whitekirk Lane and Mustang Way. 25. A provision for Pedestrian and Bike Trail Easement in included however, there are no easements shown on the plat. Either the provision is to be removed or easements are to be shown. A more complete review will be performed upon the submittal of all required documents. Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble July 23, 2013 Page 4 of 4 The developer should provide the requested information and make the necessary revisions and submit two (2) sets of plans for further review. If you have any questions regarding the above or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. Bradle y P. Sanderson P.E. , Vice President PC: Mr. Bart Olson, City Administrator Mr. Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Ms. Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation Ms. Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Mr. David Schultz, HR Green BJA, JAM, EEI G:1 PubliclYorkvillet2Q131Y01313-DR Prestwick-Unit 21Docslicoy Final Engineering Plans Review0l.doc Engineering Enterprises, Inc. August 14, 2013 Ms. Krysti Barksdale-Noble Community Development Director United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Final Plat Review Yorkville Christian School Subdivision United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois Dear Krysti: We are in receipt of the Final Plat of Subdivision revised August 6, 2013 by HR Green for the above referenced project. Our review of these plans is to generally determine their compliance with local ordinances and whether the improvements will conform to existing local systems and equipment. This review and our comments do not relieve the designer from his duties to conform to all required codes, regulations, and acceptable standards of engineering practice. Engineering Enterprises, Inc.'s review is not intended as an in-depth quality assurance review, we cannot and do not assume responsibility for design errors or omissions in the plans. As such, we offer the following comments: 1. Comments 22 through 25 on EEI's review letter dated July 23, 2013 have been satisfactorily addressed. 2. A full engineering submittal for the project is forthcoming from the Developer. The Final Plat is subject to change based upon final engineering review comments. If you have any questions regarding the above or if you require additional information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. �J Bradley P. Sanderson, P.E. Vice President PC: Mr. Bart Olson, City Administrator Mr. Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Ms. Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks and Recreation Ms. Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Mr. David Schultz, HR Green BJA, JAM, EEI \\Milkyway\EEI_Storage\Dots\Public\Yorkville\2013\YO1313-DR Prestwick-Unit 2\Docs\lcoy Final Plat Review 02.doc Road,52 Wheeler Sugar Grove, 60554 • 1 466-6700 • 1 466-6701 fax — www.eeiw'• •