The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet 2013 10-08-13 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, October 8, 2013 Call to Order: Pledge of Allegiance: Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV Carlo Colosimo Jackie Milschewski Chris Funkhouser Rose Ann Spears Ken Koch Larry Kot Joel Frieders Diane Teeling Establishment of Quorum: Amendments to Agenda: Presentations: 1. 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Public Hearings: Citizen Comments on Agenda Items: Consent Agenda: 1. PW 2013-39 Water Department Reports for May, June, & July 2013 2. PW 2013-40 Safe Routes to School Authorization of Contract Changes – Authorization 1 – approve decrease in the amount of $24,508.70 and authorize City Administrator to execute 3. PW 2013-41 River Road Bridge Authorizations of Contract Changes a. Authorization 10 – approve increase in the amount of $4,500.00 and authorize City Administrator to execute b. Authorization 11 – approve increase in the amount of $39,712.61 and authorize City Administrator to execute 4. ADM 2013-47 Monthly Treasurer’s Reports for July & August 2013 Minutes for Approval: 1. CC 2013-63 Minutes of the City Council – August 27, 2013 2. CC 2013-66 Minutes of the City Council – September 10, 2013 3. CC 2013-67 Minutes of the Special City Council – September 12, 2013 United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 City Council Agenda October 8, 2013 Page 2 Bills for Payment (Informational): $893,406.50 and $448,291.19 Mayor’s Report: 1. CC 2013-64 Proclamation for Constitution Week 2. CC 2013-65 Resolution Supporting the “Countywide Pay as We Grow Plan” Grant Application to Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning 3. CC 2013-68 Hometown Days Report Public Works Committee Report: 1. PW 2013-43 Caledonia – Letter of Credit Call Economic Development Committee Report: 1. EDC 2013-28 Ordinance Approving the Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area (Imperial Investments, LLC) 2. EDC 2013-22 Ordinance Disconnecting Certain Territory From the United City of Yorkville (Portion of the Hoover Forest Preserve) Public Safety Committee Report: Administration Committee Report: 1. ADM 2013-50 Tax Levy Estimate Park Board: Plan Commission: 1. PC 2013-07 – Grande Reserve Amendment to the Amended Annexation and PUD Agreement a. Ordinance Approving Second Amendment to the Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (Grande Reserve Subdivision) 2. PC 2013-12 and PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School a. Ordinance Approving the First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement b. Ordinance Approving the Resubdivision of Lot 358 of the Prestwick Unit 1 Final Plat Zoning Board of Appeals: City Council Report: City Clerk’s Report: Community and Liaison Report: Staff Report: Additional Business: City Council Agenda October 8, 2013 Page 3 Executive Session: 1. For litigation, when an action against, affecting, or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting. 2. For collective negotiating matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives, or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees. Mayor’s Report (cont’d): 1. CC 2013-69 Approval of a Settlement Agreement Citizen Comments: Adjournment: COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ADMINISTRATION: October 17, 2013 – 6:00 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Spears Finance Library Vice-Chairman: Alderman Milschewski Administration Committee: Alderman Funkhouser Committee: Alderman Frieders ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: November 5, 2013 – 7:00 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Koch Community Development Plan Commission Vice-Chairman: Alderman Teeling Building Safety and Zoning Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp. Committee: Alderman Colosimo Kendall Co. Plan Commission Committee: Alderman Frieders PUBLIC SAFETY: November 7, 2013 – 6:30 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Colosimo Police Human Resource Comm. Vice-Chairman: Alderman Spears School District Committee: Alderman Kot Committee: Alderman Funkhouser PUBLIC WORKS: October 15, 2013 – 6:00 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Teeling Public Works Park Board Vice-Chairman: Alderman Kot Engineering YBSD Committee: Alderman Milschewski Parks and Recreation Committee: Alderman Koch UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, October 8, 2013 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENTATIONS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONSENT AGENDA: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2013-39 Water Department Reports for May, June, & July 2013 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2013-40 Safe Routes to School Authorization of Contract Changes – Authorization 1 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2013-41 River Road Bridge Authorizations of Contract Changes a. Authorization 10 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ b. Authorization 11 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. ADM 2013-47 Monthly Treasurer’s Reports for July & August 2013 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2013-63 Minutes of the City Council – August 27, 2013 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CC 2013-66 Minutes of the City Council – September 10, 2013 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CC 2013-67 Minutes of the Special City Council – September 12, 2013 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BILLS FOR PAYMENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Bills for Payment (Informational) □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR’S REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2013-64 Proclamation for Constitution Week □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CC 2013-65 Resolution Supporting the “Countywide Pay as We Grow Plan” Grant Application to CMAP □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. CC 2013-68 Hometown Days Report □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2013-43 Caledonia – Letter of Credit Call □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. EDC 2013-28 Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area (Imperial Investments, LLC) □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. EDC 2013-22 Disconnection of a Portion of the Hoover Forest Preserve □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADM 2013-50 Tax Levy Estimate □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLAN COMMISSION REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PC 2013-07 Ordinance Approving Second Amendment to the Annexation & PUD Agreement for Grande Reserve Subdivision □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed _________________________________________________________________________ □ Bring back to Committee/future meeting _______________________________________________ □ Informational Item __________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PC 2013-12 & PC2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School a. Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of an Amended Annexation Agreement □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ b. Ordinance Approving a Final Plat □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed _________________________________________________________________________ □ Bring back to Committee/future meeting _______________________________________________ □ Informational Item __________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPORTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR’S REPORT (cont’d): ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2013-69 Approval of a Settlement Agreement □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Presentation #1 Tracking Number 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report City Council – October 8, 2013 Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department 2013 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Un i t e d C i t y o f Y o r k v i l l e Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2013 The United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 (630)553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2013 Prepared by: Rob Fredrickson Director of Finance UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTORY SECTION List of Principal Officials............................................................................................................................. i Organization Chart ...................................................................................................................................... ii Transmittal Letter................................................................................................................................ iii - vii Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ......................................................... viii FINANCIAL SECTION INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ......................................................................................... 1 - 2 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ...................................................... MD&A 1 - 11 BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Government-Wide Financial Statements Statement of Net Position .......................................................................................................... 3 - 4 Statement of Activities ............................................................................................................... 5 - 6 Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds ....................................................................................... 7 - 8 Reconciliation of Total Governmental Fund Balance to Net Position of Governmental Activities ...................................................................................9 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Governmental Funds ............................................................................ 10 - 11 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities ...................................12 Statement of Net Position – Proprietary Funds...................................................................... 13 - 14 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position – Proprietary Funds .............................................................................................15 Statement of Cash Flows – Proprietary Funds ...............................................................................16 Statement of Net Position – Fiduciary Funds ................................................................................17 Statement of Changes in Net Position – Fiduciary Fund ...............................................................18 Notes to the Financial Statements ................................................................................................ 19 - 61 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FINANCIAL SECTION – Continued REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Schedules of Funding Progress and Employer Contributions Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund ...............................................................................................62 Police Pension Fund .......................................................................................................................63 Other Post-Employment Benefit Plan ............................................................................................64 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual General Fund ..................................................................................................................................65 Library – Special Revenue Fund....................................................................................................66 Parks and Recreation – Special Revenue Fund ..............................................................................67 COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES Schedules of Revenues – Budget and Actual – General Fund..................................................... 68 - 69 Schedule of Expenditures – Budget and Actual – General Fund.........................................................70 Schedule of Detailed Expenditures – Budget and Actual – General Fund .................................. 71 - 76 Schedules of Revenues – Budget and Actual – Library – Special Revenue Fund ..............................77 Schedule of Expenditures – Budget and Actual – Library – Special Revenue Fund .................. 78 - 79 Schedules of Revenues – Budget and Actual – Parks and Recreation – Special Revenue Fund ........80 Schedules of Expenditures – Budget and Actual Parks and Recreation – Special Revenue Fund ...................................................................... 81 - 82 Combining Balance Sheet – Nonmajor Governmental ........................................................................83 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Nonmajor Governmental .................................................................84 Combining Balance Sheet – Nonmajor Governmental – Special Revenue Funds ...................... 85 - 86 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Nonmajor Governmental – Special Revenue Funds ............... 87 - 88 Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual Fox Hill Special Service Area – Special Revenue Fund................................................................89 Sunflower Special Service Area – Special Revenue Fund ............................................................90 Motor Fuel Tax – Special Revenue Fund ......................................................................................91 Land Cash – Special Revenue Fund ..............................................................................................92 Countryside TIF – Special Revenue Fund .....................................................................................93 Downtown TIF – Special Revenue Fund .......................................................................................94 Debt Service Fund..........................................................................................................................95 Combining Balance Sheet – Nonmajor Governmental – Capital Projects Funds ....................... 96 - 97 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Nonmajor Governmental – Capital Projects Funds ................. 98 - 99 Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual Municipal Building – Capital Projects Fund ...............................................................................100 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FINANCIAL SECTION – Continued COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES – Continued Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual Police Capital – Capital Projects Fund ........................................................................................101 Public Works Capital – Capital Projects Fund ............................................................................102 Parks and Recreation Capital – Capital Projects Fund ................................................................103 Citywide Capital – Capital Projects Fund ....................................................................................104 Schedule of Expenses and Changes in Net Position – Budget and Actual Sewer – Enterprise Fund ..............................................................................................................105 Water – Enterprise Fund ..............................................................................................................106 Recreation Center – Enterprise Fund ...........................................................................................107 Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities – Agency Funds ......................... 108 - 109 SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULES Long–Term Debt Requirements Betzwiser Development, LLC Adjustable Rate Note Payable of 2008 .............................................110 IEPA (L17-115300) Loan Payable of 2000 .......................................................................................111 IEPA (L17-1156300) Loan Payable of 2007 .....................................................................................112 General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2004B.......................................................113 General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005 .........................................................114 General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005A ......................................................115 General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005B.......................................................116 General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005C.......................................................117 General Obligation Library Bonds of 2006 .......................................................................................118 General Obligation Refunding Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2007A ....................................119 General Obligation Refunding Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2011 .......................................120 Illinois Rural Bond Bank Debt Certificates of 2003 ..........................................................................121 Debt Certificates of 2003 ...................................................................................................................122 Debt Certificates of 2004A ................................................................................................................123 Refunding Debt Certificates of 2006A ..............................................................................................124 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited) Net Position by Component – Last Nine Fiscal Years .................................................................. 125 - 126 Changes in Net Position – Last Nine Fiscal Years ........................................................................ 127 - 128 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds – Last Ten Fiscal Years .................................................. 129 - 130 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds – Last Ten Fiscal Years ............................... 131 - 132 Assessed Value and Actual Value of Taxable Property – Last Ten Fiscal Years ......................... 133 - 134 Principal Property Taxpayers – Current Tax Levy Year and Nine Tax Levy Years Ago .......................135 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates – Last Ten Tax Levy Years ..................................... 136 - 137 Property Tax Levies and Collections – Last Ten Fiscal Years ................................................................138 Estimate of Taxable Sales by Category – Last Ten Calendar Years ............................................. 139 - 140 Direct and Overlapping Sales Tax Rates – Last Ten Fiscal Years ..........................................................141 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type – Last Ten Fiscal Years ...................................................... 142 - 143 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding – Last Ten Fiscal Years ....................................................144 Schedule of Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt .......................................................145 Schedule of Legal Debt Margin – Last Ten Fiscal Years .............................................................. 146 - 147 Pledged-Revenue Coverage Governmental Activities– Last Ten Fiscal Years ......................................148 Pledged-Revenue Coverage Business-Type Activities – Last Ten Fiscal Years .....................................149 Demographic and Economic Statistics – Last Ten Calendar Years .......................................................150 Principal Employers – Current Fiscal Year and Nine Fiscal Years Ago .................................................151 Full-Time and Part-Time Equivalent Government Employees by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years............................................................................................................... 152 - 153 Operating Indicators by Function/Program – Last Ten Fiscal Years ............................................ 154 - 155 Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program – Last Ten Fiscal Years ......................................... 156 - 157 New Permits and Construction Values – Last Ten Calendar Years ........................................................158 INTRODUCTORY SECTION This section includes miscellaneous data regarding the City including: List of Principal Officials, Organization Chart, Transmittal Letter and the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Principal Officials Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2013 i EXECUTIVE Mayor: Gary J. Golinski City Clerk: Beth Warren LEGISLATIVE Ward 1: Carlo Colosimo, Alderman Ward 1: Ken Koch, Alderman Ward 2: Jackie Milschewski, Alderman Ward 2: Larry Kot, Alderman Ward 3: Mary Munns, Alderman Ward 3: Chris Funkhouser, Alderman Ward 4: Rose Spears, Alderman Ward 4: Diane Teeling, Alderman ADMINISTRATIVE City Administrator: Bart Olson Director of Finance/Deputy Treasurer: Rob Fredrickson Director of Public Works: Eric Dhuse Chief of Police: Rich Hart Director of Community Development: Krysti Barksdale-Noble Interim Director of Parks and Recreation: Laura Schraw Library Director: Michelle Pfister ii Citizens City Treasurer Mayor & City Council City Attorney Chief of Police City Administrator Administration Department Community Development Department Finance Department Parks & Recreation Department Public Works Department Park Board Library Board Library Director City Clerk Deputy Treasurer Deputy Clerk United City of Yorkville Organizational Chart Deputy Clerk iii United City of Yorkville County Seat of Kendall County 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 August 23, 2013 To The Honorable Gary J. Golinski, Mayor Members of the City Council Citizens of Yorkville, Illinois The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS for the Fiscal Year ended April 30, 2013, is hereby submitted. The submittal of this report complies with Illinois state law which requires that the City issue a report on its financial position and activity presented in conformance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) by an independent firm of certified public accountants. For the year ended April 30, 2013, the licensed certified public accounting firm of Lauterbach & Amen, LLP, has issued an unqualified (“clean”) opinion on the United City of Yorkville financial statements. The independent auditors report can be found at the front of the financial section of this report. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with management. We believe the data, as presented, is accurate in all material respects; that it is presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the financial position of the United City of Yorkville. The results of operations as measured by the financial activity of its various funds; and all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain a reasonable understanding of the City's financial affairs have been included. This report includes all funds of the City (primary government), as well as its component units, the Yorkville Public Library (blended) and Yorkville Police Pension Fund (blended). Component units are autonomous entities for which the primary government is financially accountable. Generally accepted accounting principles require that management provide a narrative introduction, overview and analysis to accompany the basic financial statements in the form of Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A). This transmittal letter is designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. The City’s MD&A can be found immediately following the report of the independent auditors. Profile of the United City of Yorkville Yorkville was first settled in 1833 and has been the county seat of Kendall County since 1859. The Village of Yorkville was incorporated in 1874, with a population of approximately 500 people. At that time the Village of Yorkville only encompassed land on the south side of the Fox River; another village, called Bristol, was located directly across from Yorkville on the north side of the river. In 1957 the two villages merged, via referendum, to form the United City of Yorkville. The City, a non-home rule community as defined by the Illinois Constitution, covers approximately 22 square miles with a 2010 census population of iv 16,921 residents. The City is located in central Kendall County, about 45 miles southwest of Chicago, Illinois. The City operates under a Mayor/Council form of government, as defined in Illinois state statutes. The legislative authority of the City is vested in an eight-member council, each elected from their respective wards to overlapping four year terms. The Mayor, City Treasurer and City Clerk are elected at large. The Mayor appoints, with Council consent, a City Administrator to manage the day-to-day operations of the City. The City provides a full range of municipal services with 72 full-time, and 64 part-time persons working in public safety, public works, planning and zoning, parks and recreation, library services and general administration. The City maintains approximately 80 miles of streets and over 250 acres of park and green space. The City operates its own water distribution system with sewage treatment provided by the Yorkville Bristol Sanitation District. The Yorkville Public Library is operated under an appointed board, which is separate from the City Council. Library Board positions are appointed by the Mayor and expire on a rotating basis. Library operations are administered by the Library Board, however, the City is required by state statute to include within its property tax levy and budget, the Library’s requests. The Library does not have authority to issue debt, and must do so through the City. Thus, the Library is a component unit of the City. Accounting System and Budgetary Control Management of the United City of Yorkville is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure. The internal control structure is designed to ensure that the assets of the City are protected from loss, theft or misuse and to ensure that adequate accounting data is compiled to allow for the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. This structure is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. In addition, the United City of Yorkville maintains budgetary controls. The objective of these budgetary controls is to ensure compliance with legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget approved by the City's governing body. Activities of the general fund, special revenue funds, capital project funds, debt service funds and enterprise funds are included in the annual appropriated budget. Project-length financial plans are adopted for the capital projects funds. The level of budgetary control (that is, the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) is established at the departmental level within the General Fund and at the fund level for all other budgeted funds. Local Economy Yorkville is home to several large and midsized manufacturers and retailers including Wrigley Manufacturing Co., Boombah, Inc., Newlywed Foods, Jewel/Osco, Target, Kohl’s, Dick’s Sporting Goods and Menards. It is also home to Raging Waves, Illinois largest water park. The City, along with the Yorkville Economic Development Corporation (YEDC), a quasi-public private/public partnership partially funded by the City, continue to work on attracting commercial and retail business to locate within the United City of Yorkville. The local housing market showed signs of improvement over the course of the current fiscal year, as the number of foreclosures in the City declined by approximately 40% in comparison to fiscal year 2012. There has also been a steady increase in the number of new construction building permits issued, which reached a post-recession high of 80 permits. A portion of this increase in residential building activity can be attributed v to the City’s Buyers of Undeveloped Infill Lot Discount (B.U.I.L.D.) program. The B.U.I.L.D. program, which was implemented in January of 2012, is a comprehensive incentive and stimulus program aimed at newly constructed single-family detached homes. The program allows for delayed and reduced permit and impact fees for builders, and a building rebate fee to homebuyers. The program has been so successful, that in March of 2013 the City Council approved a second extension of the program thru June of 2014. Major Initiatives In fiscal year 2013 the City continued to pursue several major initiatives, including: • Raintree Park B – This five acre park includes four lighted tennis courts, an exercise hill, a baseball field, multipurpose open space, a playground and sitting area and a small permeable paver parking lot. A shared use path winds through the site with fitness equipment located adjacent to the path. This project was completed in November of 2012, and was financed by City land cash and the State’s OSLAD Grant program. • River Road Bridge – Construction activities neared completion as fiscal year 2013 came to a close. The total cost for this project is $1.7 million, with funding provided by the Federal Highway Bridge Program (80% of construction engineering), Kendall County and the City. Construction expenditures will be financed by a zero interest loan from Kendall County, payable in six annual installments by the City. The bridge was re-opened in early July 2013. • Route 47 Expansion – This is a joint project between the City and the Illinois Department of Transportation, in which Illinois Route 47 will be expanded into five lanes. The road improvements start at Kennedy Road, continue thru the downtown and culminate at Illinois Route 71. Currently the total cost of this project that is applicable to the City (including costs associated with the replacement and relocation of water and sewer lines) is approximately $3.4 million, payable to the State in monthly installments over the next ten years. • Road Study – A road study was conducted in fiscal year 2013 for the purposes of establishing a pavement management system and to develop a multi-year rehabilitation plan. City roadways were analyzed based on three components (surface condition, deflective condition and dynamic condition) and then prioritized into multi-year improvement schedules in order to maximize budgetary effectiveness. This road study will serve as the basis for the City’s new “Road to Better Roads” program. • Downtown TIF – Two new restaurants opened in the downtown TIF district; Mongolian 211 – which features Asian-style barbeque; and a new bar & grill called Rowdy’s. In addition, the Cobblestone Bakery was remodeled and expanded to include a full-service sit down restaurant. The downtown also saw the opening of a new cross-fit athletic workout facility in the Boombah Performance building. • Countryside TIF – In March construction began for a new 30,000 square foot multiplex movie theater in the Kendall Crossing development which is slated to open in the winter of 2013. This development also contains six additional outlots allowing for potential commercial development in the future. vi • Safe Routes to School – In connection with the State’s Safe Route to School Program, construction began to install new sidewalks at various locations across the City in order to encourage walking and bicycling to and from school. This project was completed in early fiscal year 2014 and was primarily funded by a grant from the State in the amount of $280,000. • Kennedy Road Bike Path – In 2011, the City was awarded a grant through the ITEP program for the construction of a shared-use path along Kennedy Road from Illinois Route 47 to Bridge Park. During fiscal year 2013, the Phase I Engineering Study was initiated and funded by donations received from a local not-for-profit organization called Push for the Path. Long-Term Financial Planning Management annually develops five-year financial forecasts for all budgeted funds. These forecasts serve as the basis for identifying not only future capital needs, but future operational and personnel requirements as well. Revenue and expenditure trends will be evaluated and prioritized based on the goals set forth by the City Council. It is the intent of management that this five-year financial forecast will serve as the foundation for each year’s corresponding budget document. Relevant Financial Policies In order to insure that the City continues to meet its immediate and long term service goals, several financial policies and procedures have been implemented by management. Some of the more prescient policies include the following: • Issue a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) within 180 days of the end of each fiscal year that complies with generally accepted accounting principles. • Monthly revenue, expenditure and cash balance reporting for all funds. These financial reports ensure that the City Council is made aware of any variances from the appropriated budget. In addition, the City’s budget document continues to be revised in order to enhance transparency. • The City was awarded a certificate of achievement in connection with the Illinois Policy Institute’s local transparency initiative. A “Information for Citizens” section was added to the City’s website containing a wide array of financial information including: budget and audit information; annual treasurer’s reports; bill lists; employee salary and benefit information; tax rates and fees; and other nonfinancial information. • An investment policy which invests public funds in a manner which protects principal, maximizes return for a given level of risk and meets the daily cash flow needs of the City. • A capital asset policy which establishes the capitalization thresholds and estimated useful lives of fixed assets. • A purchasing policy to ensure that goods and services are obtained in a timely manner at the lowest possible cost. • A fund balance policy establishing benchmark reserve levels to be maintained in the City’s various funds, in order to promote financial stability and provide adequate cash flow for operations. Pension Trust Funds and Post-Employment Benefits Two pension plans are established by State Statute, which cover City employees. The benefits and funding of each plan are determíned by state statute, and each plan provides retirement, disability and death benefits for participants. The Police Pension Fund is funded tlirough an annual properly tax levy, employee contributions and investment earnings. The Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (IMRF) pension plan covers civilian full-time employees. Funding for IMRF is made through contributions from the employer (actuarially determined annually by the nvIRF) and employees of the City (established at 4.5Vo of total compensation). Employees covered under both pension plans also contribute to Social Security (6.2% of salary capped annuaÍy) and Medicare (1 .45% of total compensation). The notes to the financial statement provide more information pertaining to employee pensions. The City also provides post-retirement health care benefits for retirees and their dependents. Since the City does not contribute towards the cost of the retiree's health insurance, the City is reporting on the implicit liability that is created when the retiree (by State Statute) is charged the group rate for the inrrr.u*e as opposed to the true rate that would have been charged based on risk. Awards and Acknowledgments The Government Finance Offìcers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the United City of Yorkville for its comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012. This was the 2"d year that the City has received this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a govemment must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive amual financial repoft. The report must also satisff both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Cerlificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. V/e believe that our cuffent comprchensive atnual financial reporl continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another cerlificate. The preparation of the comprehensive annual hnancial report would not have been possible without the dedicated services of the City department heads and staff. The entire finance deparlment staff is extended a special appreciation for all of their assistance in the completion of the annual audit. Additionally, we would like to acknowledge the Mayor and City Council for their leadership and support in planning and conducting the financial operations of the City, which has made preparation of thii report possible. Respectfu lly submitted, Bart Olson City Administrator Rob Fredrickson Director of Finance v11 ( Government Finance Officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to United City of YorkvÍlle Illinois For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended April 30,2012 ffirÊtu- Þ Executive Director/CEO vlll FINANCIAL SECTION This section includes: • Independent Auditors’ Report • Management’s Discussion and Analysis • Basic Financial Statements • Required Supplementary Information • Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT This section includes the opinion of the City’s independent auditing firm. Lauterbach & Amen, LLP 27W457 WARRENVILLE RD. . WARRENVILLE, ILLINOIS 60555 pHoNE 630.393.1483 . FAX 630.393.2s16 www. lauterbachamen.comCERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT August 23,2013 The Honorable City Mayor Members of the City Council United City of Yorkville, Illinois We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the goverïrmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the United City of yorkvilie, Illinois, as of and for the year ended April 30, 2013,which collectively comprise the City's'basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents, and the related notes to the financial statements. Management's Re sponsib il ity for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or e1Tor. Auditor's Responsibility Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement" An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City's preparation and fair presentation of the finaneial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Ciiy's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriatenessof accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimàtès made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is suffrcient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. United City of Yorkville, Illinois August 23,2013 Page2 Opinions In our opinion, the flrnancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the United City of Yorkville, Illinois, as of April 30, 2013, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Other Matters Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the United City of Yorkville, Illinois', financial statements as a whole. The introductory section, combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules, supplemental schedules, and statistical section are presented for pu{poses of additional analysis and are not a required part of the financial statements. The combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules and supplemental schedules are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the information is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements as a whole. The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. LP LAUTERBACH & AMEN, LLP 2 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 1 As management of the United City of Yorkville (“City”), we offer readers of the City’s financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2013. Since the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is designed to focus on the current year’s activities, resulting changes and currently known facts, it should be read in conjunction with the Letter of Transmittal on pages iii through vii and the City’s financial statements (beginning on page 3). Financial Highlights • The assets/deferred outflows of the United City of Yorkville exceeded its liabilities/deferred inflows at the close of the fiscal year by $114,063,009 (net position), which represents an increase of $11,238,443 or 10.9% from the previous fiscal year. • Total revenues increased by 14.7% from $25,946,758 to $29,748,271. Overall expenses totaled $18,509,828, which is a decrease of 7.7% from the preceding fiscal year. • As of the culmination of the current fiscal year, the City’s governmental funds reported combined fund balances of $8,046,822, compared to $4,683,582 reported at April 30, 2012. • For the fiscal year ended April 30, 2013, the City’s General Fund reported a net increase in fund balance of $2,953,197. Total ending fund balance in the General Fund was a positive $4,223,820. • Both the City’s Water and Sewer funds reported positive changes in net position during the current fiscal year, reporting ending net position balances of $22,649,646 and $22,873,255, respectively. • The City’s total general obligated bonded indebtedness decreased by $1,170,000 during the current fiscal year, for a total of $30,930,000 outstanding at April 30, 2013. Overview of the Financial Statements This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City’s basic financial statements. The City’s basic financial statements are comprised of three components: (1) government- wide financial statements, (2) fund financial statements, and (3) notes to the financial statements. The governmental-wide statements are divided between governmental activities and business-type activities, with the public library presented as a blended component unit. The perspective of the fund financial statements presents financial information for individual funds established by the City for specific purposes. They are categorized into three distinct groups: governmental, proprietary and fiduciary. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements. Government-Wide Financial Statements The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector business. The Statement of Net Position presents information on all of the City’s assets/deferred outflows and liabilities/deferred inflows, with the difference between the two reported as net position. Over time increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating. The Statement of Activities presents information showing how the City’s net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 2 Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business-type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government (legislative, administration, finance), public safety (police), community development, public works (street operations, health & sanitation), and parks and recreation. Property taxes, shared state taxes and local utility taxes finance the majority of these services. Business-type activities reflect private sector type operations, where the fee for service typically covers all or most of the cost of operations, including depreciation. The business-type activities of the City include water, sewer and recreation center management. The government-wide financial statements may be found on pages 3 through 6 of this report. Fund Financial Statements A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-related legal requirements. All of the funds of the United City of Yorkville can be divided into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds and fiduciary funds. Governmental Funds Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the City’s near-term financing decisions. Both the Governmental Fund Balance Sheet and the Governmental Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The City maintains fifteen individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the Governmental Fund Balance Sheet and in the Governmental Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances for the General Fund, Library Fund and the Parks and Recreation Fund, all of which are considered to be major funds. Information from the City’s other twelve governmental funds are combined into a single column presentation. Individual fund information for these non-major governmental funds is provided elsewhere in the report. The United City of Yorkville adopts annual budgets for its General Fund, Library Fund and Parks and Recreation Fund. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided for all three funds to demonstrate compliance with this budget. The basic governmental fund financial statements may be found on pages 7 through 12 of this report. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 3 Proprietary Funds The City maintains one type of proprietary fund (enterprise funds). Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-type activities in the government-wide financial statements. The City uses enterprise funds to account for its water, sewer and recreation center operations. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for the Water Fund (major fund), the Sewer Fund (major fund) and the Recreation Center Fund. The basic proprietary fund financial statements may be found on pages 13 through 16 of this report. Fiduciary Funds Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the City. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government-wide financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the City’s operations. The City maintains one fiduciary trust fund; the Police Pension Fund and two agency funds; one for fees held for other governmental agencies and one for developer deposits. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is similar to that used by proprietary funds. The basic fiduciary fund financial statements may be found on pages 17 and 18 of this report. Notes to the Financial Statements The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the information provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the financial statements may be found on pages 19 through 61 of this report. Other Information In addition to the basic financial statements, this report also includes certain required supplementary information related to budgetary information and the City’s progress in funding its obligation to provide pension benefits to its employees. Required non-major fund information can be found following the required supplementary information. Required supplementary information may be found on pages 62 through 82 of this report. The combing statements referred to earlier in connection with non-major governmental funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary information on pensions. Combing and individual fund statements and schedules may be found on pages 83 through 109 of this report. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 4 GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Statement of Net Position The following chart reflects the condensed Statement of Net Position (in millions): 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 Assets: Current Assets 15.0$ 11.4$ 4.5$ 4.8$ 19.5$ 16.2$ Capital Assets 75.8 73.9 59.2 55.6 135.0 129.5 Other Assets/Deferred Outflows - - 11.5 11.6 11.5 11.6 Total Assets 90.9 85.3 75.1 72.0 166.0 157.3 Liabilities: Current Liabilities 2.7 3.4 2.5 2.0 5.3 5.4 Long-term Liabilities/Deferred Inflows 19.2 19.3 27.4 29.6 46.7 48.9 Total Liabilities 22.0 22.8 29.9 31.6 51.9 54.4 Net Position: Invested in Capital Assets, Net 62.0 58.9 31.7 26.6 93.7 85.5 Restricted 3.5 3.5 - 0.7 3.5 4.2 Unrestricted 3.3 0.1 13.5 13.0 16.8 13.1 Total Net Position 68.9$ 62.5$ 45.2$ 40.3$ 114.1$ 102.8$ Primary Government Total Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities The City’s combined net position increased by $11.3 million, from $102.8 to $114.1 million, during the current fiscal year. This change is the result of $6.4 million and $4.9 million increases in the net position of governmental activities and business-type activities, respectively. The increase in the net position of governmental activities in fiscal year 2013 was due primarily to favorable operating results, which enhanced the current asset position of funds associated with governmental activities. The enhanced net position of business-type activities was due mainly to a rise in capital assets associated with the Water and Sewer funds. The largest portion of the United City of Yorkville’s net position, or 82%, reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g., land, infrastructure, buildings, machinery and equipment), less any related debt used to acquire or construct those assets that are still outstanding. The City uses its capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the United City of Yorkville’s investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. An additional portion of the United City of Yorkville’s net position, or 3%, represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. Total restricted net position is comprised as follows: 12.8% is for library operations; 0.6% is for the maintenance of special service areas; 32.6% is for future road maintenance and improvement projects relating to the City’s motor fuel tax (MFT) program; 50.5% is restricted Tax Increment Financing (TIF) projects and the remaining 3.4% is restricted future land cash projects. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 5 As of April 30, 2013, the City was able to report positive balances in all three categories of net position, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental and business-type activities. Additional information on the Statement of Net Position may be found on pages 3 and 4 of this report. Activities The following table reflects the revenue and expenses of the City’s activities (in millions). 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 Revenues Program Revenues: Charges for Services 2.1$ 2.4$ 4.7$ 4.6$ 6.8$ 7.0 Operating Grants & Contributions 0.7 0.6 - - 0.7 0.6 Capital Grants & Contributions 3.3 1.4 4.8 2.4 8.15 3.8 General Revenues: Property Taxes 4.7 5.0 0.2 1.9 4.9 6.9 Other Taxes 8.5 6.9 - - 8.5 6.9 Other Revenue 0.7 0.7 0.1 - 0.8 0.7 Total Revenues 20.0 17.0 9.8 8.9 29.8 25.9 Expenses General Government 3.1 5.7 - - 3.1 5.7 Public Safety 3.8 2.9 - - 3.8 2.9 Community Development 0.4 0.3 - - 0.4 0.3 Public Works 3.0 2.9 - - 3.0 2.9 Library 0.9 0.9 - - 0.9 0.9 Parks & Recreation 1.8 1.9 - - 1.8 1.9 Interest Long-Term Debt 0.7 0.7 - - 0.7 0.7 Water - - 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.5 Sewer - - 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.7 Recreation Center - - 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 Total Expenses 13.6 15.3 4.9 4.8 18.5 20.1 Revenues Over (Under) Expenses 6.4 1.7 4.9 4.1 11.3 5.9 Change in Net Position $6.4 $1.7 $4.9 $4.1 $11.3 $5.9 Primary Government Total Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 6 Governmental Activities Revenues Total governmental activities revenue for the current fiscal year was $19,974,986, compared to $16,987,408 in previous fiscal year, an increase of 17.6%. Property taxes, the City’s largest single revenue source (24% of total revenues) totaled $4.74 million in fiscal year 2013. Property taxes support governmental activities, including the City’s annual contribution to the Yorkville Police Pension. Property tax revenues decreased by 4% in the current fiscal year, due to the closure of the Fox Industrial TIF and the declining assessed values of the City’s two remaining TIF districts. Year over year sales tax revenues increased by 49%, due to the $1,919,423 generated by the first full year of the City’s 1% non-home rule sales tax, which went into effect January 1, 2012. Excluding non- home rule sales tax, municipal sales tax revenues experienced a marginal decline of approximately 2% (mostly due to the closure of a building materials retailer within the City), going from $2,552,483 in fiscal year 2012 to $2,490,503 in fiscal year 2013. The “other taxes” classification includes a number of revenue sources, including income and utility taxes. Income tax continued to be robust in fiscal year 2013, reporting an increase of 10% over the prior year amount. Utility taxes were down slightly by 1%, due primarily to mild weather over the winter months. Expenses -1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 General Government Community Development Library Interest on Long-Term Debt Governmental Activities -Expenses by Function (in thousands) FY 2013 FY 2012 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 7 Total expenses amounted to $13,648,846 for governmental activities in fiscal year 2013. This reflects a decrease of 10.45% from the prior year. The public safety function comprises the greatest proportion of governmental activities expenses, accounting for approximately 27% of the total, followed by the general government and public works functions at 23% and 22%, respectively. In fiscal year 2013 general government expenses decreased significantly (46%), due to the budgeted reallocation of health and liability insurance expenses (which had been incurred solely by the general government function in previous fiscal years) to other functional areas in order to better assess the operational costs of providing those services. In addition, last year’s general government function contained one-time expenses regarding the liquidation of the Fox Industrial TIF and the prepayment of a developer commitment, which further explain the decline in expenses when compared to fiscal year 2012. The only noteworthy increase in expenses for governmental activities was in public safety, which increased by 29% over the previous fiscal year, due to the aforementioned reallocation of insurance expenses and an increase in capital purchases for vehicles and equipment. The following pie chart shows the breakdown of governmental activities expenses by function. Business-Type Activities Business-type activities increased the City’s net position by $4.9 million. Approximately 48% of business-type activity revenue is generated from fees for services relating to the City’s recreation center and water and sewer utilities. Charges for service totaled $4,675,394 in fiscal year 2013, which represents an increase of $96,231 (2%) over prior year amounts. This marginal increase is attributable to augmented utility rates and connection fee revenue. Capital grants and contributions totaled $4.83 million in fiscal year 2013, an increase of $2.39 million over prior year, resulting from the City’s acceptance of sewer and water infrastructure from developers (i.e. developer donations). In addition, property tax revenues totaled $155,999 in the current fiscal year, which were used to finance debt service requirements in the Sewer and Water Funds. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE GOVERNMENT’S FUNDS Governmental Funds - The focus of the United City of Yorkville’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the United City of Yorkville’s financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 8 At the end of the current fiscal year, the United City of Yorkville’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $8,046,822, an increase of $3,363,240 over last year’s totals. The majority of fund balance for the governmental funds is split between the restricted and unassigned categories. Restricted fund balance, which accounts for 44% of total fund balance, includes amounts restricted for library operations, special service areas, TIF related projects and the City’s motor fuel tax program. The bulk of the unassigned fund balance, which also accounts for 44% of total governmental fund balance, is in the General Fund ($4.08 million). The negative fund balance portion, shown under the “nonmajor” fund column, represents the deficit position of the Municipal Building Fund. Remaining fund balance for the governmental funds is allocated as follows: $174,571 (2%) is nonspendable (i.e. prepaids); $305,804 (4%) is committed for parks and recreation activities; and $504,314 (6%) is assigned for various capital projects, vehicles and equipment. The Library Fund reported a positive fund balance of $461,825 at the end of fiscal year 2013, which is an increase of $68,021 over the previous year. Library operations expenditures increased by $60,848 (9%) over fiscal year 2012 amounts, due mainly to liability and unemployment insurance expenditures being allocated to this fund for the first time. It should also be noted that actual development fee revenue exceeded budgeted amounts, which allowed for the increased funding of other expenditures pertaining to books, supplies and programming. The Parks and Recreation Fund reported a surplus amount of $40,305 in the current year, thereby increasing fund balance from $280,065 to $320,370. Operational expenditures for this fund increased by 21% over the previous fiscal year, as a result of health insurance expenditures being directly incurred by this fund for the first time. General Fund: Fiscal Year 2013 General Fund Budgetary Highlights Final Budget Actual Over(Under) % Variance Revenues Taxes $ 8,788,433 $ 9,317,383 $ 528,950 106% Intergovernmental 1,759,600 2,060,738 301,138 117% Licenses, Permits & Fees 169,300 168,831 (469) 100% Charges for Services 1,178,284 1,199,908 21,624 102% Fines & Forfeitures 201,500 169,144 (32,356) 84% Interest 3,100 7,287 4,187 235% Miscellaneous 210,892 391,519 180,627 186% Total Revenues $ 12,311,109 $ 13,314,810 $ 1,003,701 108% Expenditures General Government $ 3,640,751 $ 3,296,379 $ (344,372) 91% Public Safety 3,840,577 3,550,955 (289,622) 92% Community Development 461,426 365,188 (96,238) 79% Public Works 1,920,452 1,647,589 (272,863) 86% Total Expenditures $ 9,863,206 $ 8,860,111 $ (1,003,095) 90% Excess of Revenues over Expenditures $ 2,447,903 $ 4,454,699 $ 2,006,796 182% Other Financing Sources(Uses) (1,516,661) (1,501,502) (15,159) 99% Net Change in Fund Balance $ 931,242 $ 2,953,197 Fund Balance - Beginning of Year 1,270,623 Fund Balance - End of Year $ 4,223,820 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 9 The General Fund is the City’s primary operating fund and the largest source of funding for the day-to- day activities of its various departments. As indicated in the table above, the General fund yielded an actual surplus of $2,953,197, which increased fund balance from $1,270,623 at the beginning of the year, to $4,223,820 at the end of fiscal year 2013. This increase in fund balance is attributable to several factors including; higher than anticipated tax (municipal and non-home rule sales taxes), legal settlement proceeds and intergovernmental (income tax) revenues; lower than expected health and liability insurance costs in the administration, police and administration services departments; conservative budgeting practices and a continual effort by management and the City Council to control costs and monitor revenues. Furthermore, management is pleased to report that all functional departmental within the General Fund were under their respective appropriated budgets for the fiscal year ended 2013. Proprietary Funds - The United City of Yorkville’s proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government-wide financial statements, but in greater detail. The net position of the Water and Sewer Funds at the end of the year totaled $45,522,901, an increase of $4,993,926 from fiscal year 2012. Developer donations, totaling $4,829,491, account for the bulk of the increase. The net position of the Recreation Center Fund decreased by $81,623, due to declining membership revenues associated with the City Council’s decision to discontinue Recreation Center activities effective June 30, 2013. CAPITAL ASSET AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION Capital Assets – The United City of Yorkville’s investment in capital assets for its governmental and business-type activities as of April 30, 2013 totaled $134,993,436 (net of accumulated depreciation). Investments in capital assets include land, land improvements, construction in progress (CIP), infrastructure (roadway improvements, sanitary sewer lines, storm sewers and water lines), buildings, equipment and vehicles. The following table summarizes the changes in the City’s capital assets for governmental and business-type activities. Change in Capital Assets – Governmental Activities (in millions) NetBalanceAdditions/BalanceMay 1, 2012 Deletions April 30, 2013Non-Depreciable Assets:Land and Construction in Progress 30.2$ 0.8$ 31.0$ Depreciable Capital Assets:Infrastructure 40.7 2.6 43.3 Buildings 14.6 - 14.6 Equipment 5.8 0.4 6.3 Vehicles 2.4 0.1 2.4 Accumulated Depreciation on Capital Assets (19.8) (1.9) (21.7) Total Capital Assets, Net 73.8$ 2.0$ 75.8$ Total net capital assets for the City’s governmental activities increased in fiscal year 2013 by $2,031,743, due primarily to developer donations related to streets infrastructure. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 10 During the fiscal year depreciation expense was charged to the following functions: General Government ($58,191), Public Safety ($67,250), Public Works ($1,157,997), Library ($179,525) and Parks and Recreation ($402,229). Change in Capital Assets – Business-Type Activities (in millions) NetBalanceAdditions/BalanceMay 1, 2012 Deletions April 30, 2013Non-Depreciable Assets: Land and Construction in Progress 1.5$ 0.1$ 1.6$ Depreciable Capital Assets: Infrastructure 44.7 4.8 49.5 Equipment 18.9 - 18.9 Accumulated Depreciation on Capital Assets (9.5) (1.3) (10.8) Total Capital Assets, Net 55.6$ 3.6$ 59.2$ Net capital asset additions for the year totaled $3,598,793, the majority of which were comprised of developer donations in the form of water, sanitary and storm sewer infrastructure. During the fiscal year depreciation expense of $805,010 and $489,837 was charged to the Water and Sewer Fund functional expense categories, respectively. For more detailed information related to capital assets, see Note 3 to the financial statements, beginning on page 33. Debt Administration As of April 30, 2013, the United City of Yorkville had total debt outstanding of $41,706,823 (excluding developer commitments), comprised of general obligation and alternative revenue source bonds, debt certificates, unamortized loss on refunding and loans payable. This amount is partially comprised of six alternative revenue bonds which pledge income, sales, motor fuel, utility and incremental property taxes, and water/sewer revenues. In addition, these bonds can be reverted to the property tax rolls should the alternative revenue source prove to be inadequate. Governmental Business-Type Activities Activities Total General Obligation & Alternative Revenue Source Bonds 13,025,000$ 17,905,000$ 30,930,000$ Debt Certificates - 7,465,000 7,465,000 Unamortized Items - 395,225 395,225 Loans Payable 855,601 2,060,997 2,916,598 13,880,601$ 27,826,222$ 41,706,823$ For more detailed information related to long-term debt, see Note 3 to the financial statements, beginning on page 36. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS April 30, 2013 MD&A 11 ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR’S BUDGET Fiscal Year 2013 ended on a positive note with the City’s General Fund yielding a robust surplus $2.95 million, which further increased fund balance from $1.27 million to $4.22 million. This is the second year in a row that the General Fund has had a significant surplus after two fiscal years (2010 and 2011) of negative fund balance. The financial recovery of the General Fund has been a direct result of the difficult decisions made by the City over the past few years regarding staffing and expenditure reductions, as well as greater than expected tax and intergovernmental revenues. Based on the overall operating results of fiscal year 2013, it would appear that the local economy has stabilized, as the majority of City revenues matched or exceeded prior year amounts. Furthermore, building and development in Yorkville has carried on in a positive manner, as the City continues to develop economic incentives and other measures to attract and maintain businesses. As the City moved forward into fiscal year 2014, management continued its practice of conservatively projecting revenues, while looking for ways to reduce expenditures, in order to maintain adequate fund balances and cash reserves. The fiscal year 2014 General Fund budget is expected to run a deficit due to several large interfund transfers related to the closure of the Municipal Building and Recreation Center funds, though overall fund balance will remain positive and in excess of the City’s 15% minimum fund balance policy requirement. However, management is confident that a portion of this deficit can be mitigated, as sales and income taxes continue to exceed budgeted estimates along with the expectation that actual expenditures will be less than budgeted. Fiscal year 2014 will also be the first year of the City’s new “Road to Better Roads” program, where approximately one to two million dollars will be budgeted each year for roadway improvements along with related water, sanitary and storm sewer enhancements. Street and storm sewer improvements for the fiscal year 2014 program will be funded by motor fuel tax funds and a new road infrastructure fee. Water and sewer infrastructure improvements will be financed by a planned draw down on the net position of those funds. Other capital projects planned for the new fiscal year include: continued easement acquisition in connection with the fiscal year 2015 reconstruction of Game Farm road; the resurfacing of Cannonball Trail (LAFO Project); and the development of River Front Park, which will be partially funded by an OSLAD awarded to the City by the State in early fiscal year 2014. In addition, the City has recently completed its refinancing of a 2005 Library bond, resulting in taxpayer savings of approximately $400,000 in total interest costs over the next twelve years. REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION This financial report is designed to provide our citizens, customers, investors and creditors with a general overview of the City’s finances. Questions concerning this report or requests for additional financial information should be directed to the Director of Finance, United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The basic financial Statements include integrated sets of financial statements as required by the GASB. The sets of statements include: • Government-Wide Financial Statements • Fund Financial Statements  Governmental Funds  Proprietary Funds  Fiduciary Funds In addition, the notes to the financial statements are included to provide information that is essential to a user’s understanding of the basic financial statements. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Net Position April 30, 2013 See Following Page The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 3 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Net Position April 30, 2013 Business- Type Activities Totals Current Assets Cash and Investments $7,752,435 3,414,866 11,167,301 Receivables - Net 7,364,633 777,287 8,141,920 Prepaids 174,571 56,633 231,204 Internal Balances (259,447)259,447 - Due from Other Governments 15 - 15 Total Current Assets 15,032,207 4,508,233 19,540,440 Noncurrent Assets Capital Assets Nondepreciable Capital Assets 31,020,430 1,557,227 32,577,657 Depreciable Capital Assets 66,528,719 68,432,916 134,961,635 Accumulated Depreciation (21,705,810)(10,840,046)(32,545,856) Total Capital Assets 75,843,339 59,150,097 134,993,436 Other Assets Assets Held for Others - 11,091,000 11,091,000 Total Noncurrent Assets 75,843,339 70,241,097 146,084,436 Total Assets 90,875,546 74,749,330 165,624,876 Unamortized Loss on Refunding - 395,225 395,225 Total Assets and Deferred Outflows of Resources 90,875,546 75,144,555 166,020,101 Governmental Activities ASSETS DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 4 Business- Type Activities Totals Current Liabilities Accounts Payable 819,023 91,285 910,308 Deposits Payable 289,418 17,953 307,371 Accrued Payroll 137,178 19,603 156,781 Accrued Interest Payable 199,038 365,113 564,151 Other Liabilities 288,139 - 288,139 Other Payables 87,015 1,836 88,851 Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 928,122 2,024,704 2,952,826 Total Current Liabilities 2,747,933 2,520,494 5,268,427 Noncurrent Liabilities Compensated Absences Payable 244,440 35,166 279,606 Net Pension Obligation Payable 653,423 - 653,423 Net Other Post-Employment Benefit Payable 7,927 - 7,927 Notes Payable 823,589 - 823,589 IEPA Loans Payable - 1,880,084 1,880,084 General Obligation Bonds Payable 12,190,000 16,855,000 29,045,000 Debt Certificates Payable - 6,680,000 6,680,000 Other Liabilities 1,890 1,952,534 1,954,424 Total Noncurrent Liabilities 13,921,269 27,402,784 41,324,053 Total Liabilities 16,669,202 29,923,278 46,592,480 Property and State Taxes 5,364,612 - 5,364,612 Total Liabilities and Deferred Inflows of Resources 22,033,814 29,923,278 51,957,092 Net Investment in Capital Assets 61,962,738 31,719,100 93,681,838 Restricted Library Operations 453,630 - 453,630 Special Service Areas 22,864 - 22,864 Motor Fuel Tax 1,152,348 - 1,152,348 Land Cash 121,420 - 121,420 Tax Increment Financing Districts 1,787,605 - 1,787,605 Unrestricted 3,341,127 13,502,177 16,843,304 Total Net Position 68,841,732 45,221,277 114,063,009 LIABILITIES NET POSITION Governmental Activities DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 5 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Activities Year Ended April 30, 2013 Charges Operating Capital for Grants/Grants/ Services Contributions Contributions Governmental Activities General Government $3,121,857 1,751,309 61,635 - Library 932,748 58,794 24,123 - Parks and Recreation 1,812,483 265,614 74,337 400,000 Public Safety 3,750,318 - - - Community Development 356,689 - - - Public Works 2,983,200 - 535,963 2,917,256 Interest on Long-Term Debt 691,551 - - - Total Governmental Activities 13,648,846 2,075,717 696,058 3,317,256 Business-Type Activities Sewer 1,630,023 1,358,420 - 3,343,351 Water 2,638,252 2,823,357 - 1,486,140 Recreation Center 592,707 493,617 - - Total Business-Type Activities 4,860,982 4,675,394 - 4,829,491 18,509,828 6,751,111 696,058 8,146,747 General Revenues Taxes Property Taxes Utility Taxes Other Taxes Intergovernmental - Unrestricted Sales Taxes Income Taxes Interest Income Miscellaneous Change in Net Position Net Position - Beginning as Restated Net Position - Ending Expenses Program Revenues The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 6 Business Governmental Type Activities Activities Totals (1,308,913)- (1,308,913) (849,831)- (849,831) (1,072,532)- (1,072,532) (3,750,318)- (3,750,318) (356,689)- (356,689) 470,019 - 470,019 (691,551)- (691,551) (7,559,815)- (7,559,815) - 3,071,748 3,071,748 - 1,671,245 1,671,245 - (99,090)(99,090) - 4,643,903 4,643,903 (7,559,815)4,643,903 (2,915,912) 4,743,599 155,999 4,899,598 1,553,693 - 1,553,693 922,439 - 922,439 4,409,926 - 4,409,926 1,587,324 - 1,587,324 16,368 9,542 25,910 652,606 102,859 755,465 13,885,955 268,400 14,154,355 6,326,140 4,912,303 11,238,443 62,515,592 40,308,974 102,824,566 68,841,732 45,221,277 114,063,009 Primary Government Net Expense/Revenue The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 7 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds April 30, 2013 Cash and Investments $3,139,755 Receivables - Net of Allowances Property Taxes 2,950,692 Accounts 205,599 Other Taxes 2,328,040 Due from Other Governments 15 Due from Other Funds - Prepaids 139,985 Total Assets 8,764,086 Accounts Payable 586,758 Deposit Payable 271,365 Accrued Payroll 100,025 Other Liabilities Due to Other Funds 17,448 Other Payables - Total Liabilities 975,596 Property and State Taxes 3,564,670 Total Liabilities and Deferred Inflows of Resources 4,540,266 Nonspendable 139,985 Restricted - Committed - Assigned - Unassigned 4,083,835 Total Fund Balances 4,223,820 Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Fund Balances 8,764,086 FUND BALANCES LIABILITIES General ASSETS DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 8 Parks and Library Recreation Nonmajor Totals 490,468 148,761 3,973,451 7,752,435 1,471,763 - 328,179 4,750,634 - 5,500 44,704 255,803 1,056 - 29,100 2,358,196 - - - 15 - 317,280 39,036 356,316 8,195 14,566 11,825 174,571 1,971,482 486,107 4,426,295 15,647,970 20,949 36,397 174,919 819,023 - 18,053 - 289,418 12,881 24,272 - 137,178 4,064 - 284,075 288,139 - - 598,315 615,763 - 87,015 - 87,015 37,894 165,737 1,057,309 2,236,536 1,471,763 - 328,179 5,364,612 1,509,657 165,737 1,385,488 7,601,148 8,195 14,566 11,825 174,571 453,630 - 3,096,283 3,549,913 - 305,804 - 305,804 - - 504,314 504,314 - - (571,615)3,512,220 461,825 320,370 3,040,807 8,046,822 1,971,482 486,107 4,426,295 15,647,970 Special Revenue The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 9 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Reconciliation of Total Governmental Fund Balance to Net Position of Governmental Activities April 30, 2013 Total Governmental Fund Balances $8,046,822 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore, are not reported in the funds.75,843,339 Long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and, therefore, are not reported in the funds. Accrued Interest Payable (199,038) Compensated Absences Payable (305,550) Net Pension Obligation Payable (653,423) Net Other Post-Employment Benefit Obligation Payable (7,927) Notes Payable (855,601) General Obligation Bonds Payable (13,025,000) Other Obligations Payable (1,890) Net Position of Governmental Activities 68,841,732 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds April 30, 2013 See Following Page The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 10 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds Year Ended April 30, 2013 Revenues Taxes $9,317,383 Intergovernmental 2,060,738 Licenses, Permits and Fees 168,831 Charges for Services 1,199,908 Fines and Forfeits 169,144 Grants and Donations - Interest 7,287 Miscellaneous 391,519 Total Revenues 13,314,810 Expenditures Current General Government 3,296,379 Library - Parks and Recreation - Public Safety 3,550,955 Community Development 365,188 Public Works 1,647,589 Capital Outlay - Debt Service Principal Retirement - Interest and Fiscal Charges - Total Expenditures 8,860,111 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 4,454,699 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Disposal of Capital Assets - Debt Issuance - Transfers In - Transfers Out (1,501,502) (1,501,502) Net Change in Fund Balances 2,953,197 Fund Balances - Beginning 1,270,623 Fund Balances - Ending 4,223,820 General The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 11 Parks and Library Recreation Nonmajor Totals 1,483,545 - 376,059 11,176,987 24,123 - 976,854 3,061,715 35,200 - 196,687 400,718 14,190 265,614 - 1,479,712 9,404 - 16,739 195,287 - 5,569 68,768 74,337 1,465 244 7,372 16,368 21,885 211,246 27,956 652,606 1,589,812 482,673 1,670,435 17,057,730 - - 201,725 3,498,104 752,373 - - 752,373 - 1,398,254 52,570 1,450,824 - - 17,710 3,568,665 - - - 365,188 - - 194,206 1,841,795 - - 572,022 572,022 440,000 - 585,074 1,025,074 356,237 - 307,258 663,495 1,548,610 1,398,254 1,930,565 13,737,540 41,202 (915,581)(260,130)3,320,190 - - 5,200 5,200 - - 37,850 37,850 26,819 955,886 521,297 1,504,002 - - (2,500)(1,504,002) 26,819 955,886 561,847 43,050 68,021 40,305 301,717 3,363,240 393,804 280,065 2,739,090 4,683,582 461,825 320,370 3,040,807 8,046,822 Special Revenue The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 12 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities Year Ended April 30, 2013 Net Change in Fund Balances - Total Governmental Funds $3,363,240 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because: Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense. Capital Outlays 3,896,935 Depreciation Expense (1,865,192) Disposals - Net of Accumulated Depreciation - The issuance of long-term debt provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal on long-term debt consumes the current financial resources of the governmental funds. Amortization of Bond Issuance Costs (42,893) Issuance of Notes Payable (37,850) Deductions to Compensated Absences Payable 59,575 Additions to Net Pension Obligation Payable (89,112) Deductions to Net Other Post-Employment Benefit Obligation Payable 1,526 Retirement of Debt 1,025,074 Changes to accrued interest on long-term debt in the Statement of Activities does not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in the governmental funds.14,837 Changes in Net Position of Governmental Activities 6,326,140 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds April 30, 2013 See Following Page The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statements. 13 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds April 30, 2013 Nonmajor Recreation Water Center Totals Current Assets Cash and Investments $2,308,451 1,106,415 - 3,414,866 Receivables - Net of Allowances Property Taxes 114,940 43,027 - 157,967 Accounts 122,890 495,980 450 619,320 Due from Other Funds 568,315 - - 568,315 Prepaids 13,081 24,552 19,000 56,633 Total Current Assets 3,127,677 1,669,974 19,450 4,817,101 Noncurrent Assets Capital Assets Nondepreciable 38,951 1,518,276 - 1,557,227 Depreciable 28,236,945 40,195,971 - 68,432,916 Accumulated Depreciation (2,538,774) (8,301,272) - (10,840,046) 25,737,122 33,412,975 - 59,150,097 Other Assets Assets Held for Others 11,091,000 - - 11,091,000 Total Noncurrent Assets 36,828,122 33,412,975 - 70,241,097 Total Assets 39,955,799 35,082,949 19,450 75,058,198 Unamortized Loss on Refunding 41,121 354,104 - 395,225 Total Assets and Deferred Outflows of Resources 39,996,920 35,437,053 19,450 75,453,423 Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Sewer ASSETS DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statements. 14 Nonmajor Recreation Water Center Totals Current Liabilities Accounts Payable 8,796 75,761 6,728 91,285 Deposits Payable 5,000 12,509 444 17,953 Accrued Payroll 5,611 10,162 3,830 19,603 Accrued Interest Payable 211,069 154,044 - 365,113 Due to Other Funds - - 308,868 308,868 Other Payables - 1,836 - 1,836 Current Portion of Long-Term Debt 1,313,867 710,597 240 2,024,704 Total Current Liabilities 1,544,343 964,909 320,110 2,829,362 Noncurrent Liabilities Compensated Absences Payable 11,658 22,544 964 35,166 IEPA Loans Payable 544,932 1,335,152 - 1,880,084 General Obligation Bonds Payable 12,560,000 4,295,000 - 16,855,000 Debt Certificates Payable 1,350,000 5,330,000 - 6,680,000 Other Liabilities 1,112,732 839,802 - 1,952,534 Total Noncurrent Liabilities 15,579,322 11,822,498 964 27,402,784 Total Liabilities 17,123,665 12,787,407 321,074 30,232,146 Net Investment in Capital Assets 9,971,238 21,747,862 - 31,719,100 Unrestricted 12,902,017 901,784 (301,624)13,502,177 Total Net Position 22,873,255 22,649,646 (301,624)45,221,277 NET POSITION LIABILITIES Sewer Business-Type Activities - Enterprise The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement. 15 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - Proprietary Funds Year Ended April 30, 2013 Nonmajor Recreation Water Center Totals Operating Revenues Charges for Services $744,820 2,679,547 493,617 3,917,984 Operating Expenses Operations 425,287 1,239,702 592,707 2,257,696 Depreciation and Amortization 496,077 876,368 - 1,372,445 Total Operating Expenses 921,364 2,116,070 592,707 3,630,141 Operating Income (Loss)(176,544)563,477 (99,090)287,843 Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) Interest Income 7,339 2,203 - 9,542 Connection Fees 613,600 143,810 - 757,410 Other Income 135,326 106,065 17,467 258,858 Interest Expense (708,659)(522,182)- (1,230,841) 47,606 (270,104)17,467 (205,031) Income (Loss) Before Contributions and Transfers (128,938)293,373 (81,623)82,812 Capital Contributions 3,343,351 1,486,140 - 4,829,491 Transfers In - 82,288 - 82,288 Transfers Out (82,288)- - (82,288) Change in Net Position 3,132,125 1,861,801 (81,623)4,912,303 Net Position - Beginning as Restated 19,741,130 20,787,845 (220,001)40,308,974 Net Position - Ending 22,873,255 22,649,646 (301,624)45,221,277 Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Sewer The notes to the financial statement are an integral part of this statement. 16 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds Year Ended April 30, 2013 Nonmajor Recreation Water Center Totals Cash Flows from Operating Activities Receipts from Customers and Users $2,435,827 3,018,102 510,341 5,964,270 Payments to Employees (173,474)(310,125)(170,858)(654,457) Payments to Suppliers (1,082,973)(1,087,440)(339,483)(2,509,896) 1,179,380 1,620,537 - 2,799,917 Cash Flows from Noncapital Financing Activities Transfers In (Out)(82,288)82,288 - - Change in Interfund 802,106 - - 802,106 719,818 82,288 - 802,106 Cash Flows from Capital and Related Financing Activities Purchase of Capital Assets (13,898)(50,251)- (64,149) Debt Repayment (571,568)(907,753)- (1,479,321) Interest Payments (708,659)(522,182)- (1,230,841) (1,294,125)(1,480,186)- (2,774,311) Cash Flows from Investing Activities Interest Received 7,339 2,203 - 9,542 Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents 612,412 224,842 - 837,254 Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning 1,696,039 881,573 - 2,577,612 Cash and Cash Equivalents - Ending 2,308,451 1,106,415 - 3,414,866 Reconciliation of Operating Income to Net Cash Provided (Used) by Operating Activities Operating Income (Loss)(176,544)563,477 (99,090)287,843 Adjustments to Reconcile Operating Income to Net Income to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities: Depreciation and Amortization Expense 496,077 876,368 - 1,372,445 Connection Fees/Other Income 748,926 249,875 17,467 1,016,268 (Increase) Decrease in Current Assets 942,081 88,680 (743)1,030,018 Increase (Decrease) in Current Liabilities (831,160)(157,863)82,366 (906,657) Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 1,179,380 1,620,537 - 2,799,917 Noncash Activity - Capital Contributions 3,343,351 1,486,140 - 4,829,491 Business-Type Activities - Enterprise Sewer The notes to the financial statement are an integral part of this statement. 17 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Net Position - Fiduciary Funds April 30, 2013 Agency Cash and Cash Equivalents $431,733 395,834 Investments U.S. Government and Agency Securities 2,016,325 - Mutual Funds 2,271,589 - Corporate Bonds 311,922 - Receivables - Net of Allowances - 556,249 Accrued Interest 21,518 - Total Assets 5,053,087 952,083 Accounts Payable 1,648 - Other Liabilities - 952,083 Total Liabilities 1,648 952,083 Held in Trust for Pension Benefits 5,051,439 - NET POSITION Trust Pension Police ASSETS LIABILITIES The notes to the financial statement are an integral part of this statement. 18 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Statement of Changes in Net Position - Fiduciary Fund Year Ended April 30, 2013 Additions Contributions - Employer $438,711 Contributions - Plan Members 180,395 Total Contributions 619,106 Investment Income Interest Earned 127,779 Net Change in Fair Value 235,550 363,329 Less Investment Expenses (20,761) Net Investment Income 342,568 Total Additions 961,674 Deductions Administration 14,193 Benefits and Refunds 378,075 Total Deductions 392,268 Change in Net Position 569,406 Net Position Held in Trust for Pension Benefits Net Position - Beginning 4,482,033 Net Position - Ending 5,051,439 Police Trust Pension UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 19 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The United City of Yorkville (City) is an Illinois unit of local government. The financial statements include all functions, programs and activities under control of the City Council. The City’s major operations include public safety, public works, library, parks and recreation, community development, water and sewer services, and general administration. The City Council has oversight responsibility for the City, the Public Library and the Park and Recreation Board. Oversight responsibility includes designation of management and all other control over operations of these entities. The government-wide financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is responsible for establishing GAAP for state and local governments through its pronouncements (Statements and Interpretations). The more significant of the City’s accounting policies established in GAAP and used by the City are described below. REPORTING ENTITY The City’s financial reporting entity comprises the following: Primary Government: United City of Yorkville In determining the financial reporting entity, the City complies with the provisions of GASB Statement No. 39, “Determining Whether Certain Organizations are Component Units – an Amendment of GASB Statement No. 14,” and includes all component units that have a significant operational or financial relationship with the City. Based upon the criteria set forth in the GASB Statement No. 39, there are no component units included in the reporting entity. Police Pension Employees Retirement System The City’s police employees participate in the Police Pension Employees Retirement System (PPERS). PPERS functions for the benefit of these employees and is governed by a five-member pension board. Two members appointed by the City’s Mayor, one elected pension beneficiary and two elected police employees constitute the pension board. The participants are required to contribute a percentage of salary as established by state statute and the City is obligated to fund all remaining PPERS costs based upon actuarial valuations. The State of Illinois is authorized to establish benefit levels and the City is authorized to approve the actuarial assumptions used in the determination of contribution levels. Although it is legally separate from the City, the PPERS is reported as if it were part of the primary City because its sole purpose is to provide retirement benefits for the City’s police employees. The PPERS is reported as a pension trust fund. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 20 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued BASIS OF PRESENTATION Government-Wide Statements The City’s basic financial statements include both government-wide (reporting the City as a whole) and fund financial statements (reporting the City’s major funds). Both the government-wide and fund financial statements categorize primary activities as either governmental or business type. The City’s police safety, highway and street maintenance and reconstruction, building code enforcement, public improvements, economic development, parks and recreation, planning and zoning, and general administrative services are classified as governmental activities. The City’s sewer, water, and recreation center services are classified as business-type activities. In the government-wide Statement of Net Position, both the governmental and business-type activities columns are: (a) presented on a consolidated basis by column, and (b) reported on a full accrual, economic resource basis, which recognizes all long-term assets/deferred outflows and receivables as well as long-term debt/deferred inflows and obligations. The City’s net position is reported in three parts: net investment in capital assets; restricted; and unrestricted. The City first utilizes restricted resources to finance qualifying activities. The government-wide Statement of Activities reports both the gross and net cost of each of the City’s functions and business-type activities (general government, public safety, highways and streets, etc.). The functions are supported by general government revenues (property, sales and use taxes, certain intergovernmental revenues, fines, permits and charges for services, etc.). The Statement of Activities reduces gross expenses (including depreciation) by related program revenues, which include 1) changes to customers or applicants who purchase, use or directly benefit from goods, services or privileges provided by a given function or segment and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or segment. The net costs (by function or business-type activity) are normally covered by general revenue (property, sales and use taxes, certain intergovernmental revenues, permits and charges for services, etc.). This government-wide focus is more on the sustainability of the City as an entity and the change in the City’s net position resulting from the current year’s activities. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 21 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued BASIS OF PRESENTATION – Continued Fund Financial Statements The financial transactions of the City are reported in individual funds in the fund financial statements. Each fund is accounted for by providing a separate set of self-balancing accounts that comprise its assets/deferred outflows, liabilities/deferred inflows, fund equity, revenues and expenditures/expenses. Funds are organized into three major categories: governmental, proprietary, and fiduciary. The emphasis in fund financial statements is on the major funds in either the governmental or business-type activities categories. Nonmajor funds by category are summarized into a single column. GASB Statement No. 34 sets forth minimum criteria (percentage of the assets/deferred outflows, liabilities/deferred inflows, revenues or expenditures/expenses of either fund category or the governmental and enterprise combined) for the determination of major funds. The City electively added funds, as major funds, which either have debt outstanding or a specific community focus. The nonmajor funds are combined in a column in the fund financial statements. A fund is considered major if it is the primary operating fund of the City or meets the following criteria: Total assets/deferred outflows, liabilities/deferred inflows, revenues, or expenditures/expenses of that individual governmental or enterprise fund are at least 10 percent of the corresponding total for all funds of that category or type; and Total assets/deferred outflows, liabilities/deferred inflows, revenues, or expenditures/expenses of the individual governmental fund or enterprise fund are at least 5 percent of the corresponding total for all governmental and enterprise funds combined. The various funds are reported by generic classification within the financial statements. The following fund types are used by the City: Governmental Funds The focus of the governmental funds’ measurement (in the fund statements) is upon determination of financial position and changes in financial position (sources, uses, and balances of financial resources) rather than upon net income. The following is a description of the governmental funds of the City: General fund is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The General Fund is a major fund. Special revenue funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. The City maintains nine special revenue funds. The Library Fund, a major fund, is used to account for the activity relating to the Yorkville Public Library. The Parks and Recreation Fund, also a major fund, is used to account for the revenues and expenditures associated with Yorkville’s Parks and Recreation departments. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 22 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued BASIS OF PRESENTATION – Continued Fund Financial Statements – Continued Governmental Funds – Continued Debt service funds are used to account for the accumulation of funds for the periodic payment of principal and interest on general long-term debt. The City maintains one debt service fund. Capital projects funds are used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by business-type/proprietary funds). The City maintains five capital projects funds. Proprietary Funds The focus of proprietary fund measurement is upon determination of operating income, changes in net position, financial position, and cash flows. The generally accepted accounting principles applicable are those similar to businesses in the private sector. The following is a description of the proprietary funds of the City: Enterprise funds are required to account for operations for which a fee is charged to external users for goods or services and the activity is (a) financed with debt that is solely secured by a pledge of the net revenues, (b) has third party requirements that the cost of providing services, including capital costs, be recovered with fees and charges, or (c) establishes fees and charges based on a pricing policy designed to recover similar costs. The City maintains three enterprise funds. The Sewer Fund, a major fund, is used to account for the operation and sewer infrastructure maintenance of the City-owned sewer system, as well as the construction of new sewer systems within City limits. Revenues are generated through a user maintenance fee. The Water Fund, also a major fund, is used to account for the operation and water infrastructure maintenance of the City-owned water distribution system, as well as the construction of new water systems. Revenues are generated through charges based on water consumption and user maintenance fees. Fiduciary Funds Fiduciary funds are used to report assets held in a trustee or agency capacity by the City for others and therefore are not available to support City programs. The reporting focus is on net position and changes in net position and is reported using accounting principles similar to proprietary funds. Pension trust funds are used to account for assets held in a trustee capacity by the City for pension benefit payments. The Police Pension Fund accounts for the accumulation of resources to pay pension costs. Resources are contributed by police force members at rates fixed by state statutes and by the government through an annual property tax levy. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 23 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued BASIS OF PRESENTATION – Continued Fund Financial Statements – Continued Fiduciary Funds – Continued Agency funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a purely custodial capacity. The Developer Deposit Fund is used to account for developer deposits that are used to reimburse the City for all expenses incurred as a result of processing developer applications and requests. The Escrow Deposit Fund is used to account for various funds collected on behalf of other governmental agencies. The City’s fiduciary funds are presented in the fiduciary fund financial statements by type (pension trust and agency). Since by definition these assets are being held for the benefit of a third party (other local governments, private parties, pension participants, etc.) and cannot be used to address activities or obligations of the City, these funds are not incorporated into the government-wide statements. MEASUREMENT FOCUS AND BASIS OF ACCOUNTING Measurement focus is a term used to describe “which” transactions are recorded within the various financial statements. Basis of accounting refers to “when” transactions are recorded regardless of the measurement focus applied. Measurement Focus On the government-wide Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities, both governmental and business-like activities are presented using the economic resources measurement focus as defined below. In the fund financial statements, the “current financial resources” measurement focus or the “economic resources” measurement focus is used as appropriate. All governmental funds utilize a “current financial resources” measurement focus. Only current financial assets/deferred outflows and liabilities/deferred inflows are generally included on their balance sheets. Their operating statements present sources and uses of available spendable financial resources during a given period. These funds use fund balance as their measure of available spendable financial resources at the end of the period. All proprietary and pension trust funds utilize an “economic resources” measurement focus. The accounting objectives of this measurement focus are the determination of operating income, changes in net position (or cost recovery), financial position, and cash flows. All assets/deferred outflows and liabilities/deferred inflows (whether current or noncurrent) associated with their activities are reported. Proprietary and pension trust fund equity is classified as net position. Agency funds are not involved in the measurement of results of operations; therefore, measurement focus is not applicable to them. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 24 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued MEASUREMENT FOCUS AND BASIS OF ACCOUNTING – Continued Basis of Accounting In the government-wide Statement of Net Position and Statement of Activities, both governmental and business-like activities are presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when the liability/deferred inflows is incurred or economic asset used. Revenues, expenses, gains, losses, assets/deferred outflows, and liabilities/deferred inflows resulting from exchange and exchange-like transactions are recognized when the exchange takes place. In the fund financial statements, governmental funds are presented on the modified accrual basis of accounting. Under this modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when “measurable and available.” Measurable means knowing or being able to reasonably estimate the amount. Available means collectible within the current period or within sixty days after year-end. The City recognizes property taxes when they become both measurable and available in accordance with GASB Codification Section P70. A sixty day availability is generally used for revenue recognition for all other governmental fund revenues. Income tax will exceed the sixty day recognition period due to the State of Illinois and the long delay with releasing these funds. Expenditures (including capital outlay) are recorded when the related fund liability is incurred, except for general obligation bond principal and interest which are recognized when due. In applying the susceptible to accrual concept under the modified accrual basis, those revenues susceptible to accrual are property taxes, state and utility taxes, franchise taxes, interest revenue, and charges for services. All other revenues are not susceptible to accrual because generally they are not measurable until received in cash. All proprietary, pension trust and agency funds utilize the accrual basis of accounting. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when the liability is incurred or economic asset used. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the City’s enterprise funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 25 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued ASSETS/DEFERRED OUTFLOWS, LIABILITIES/DEFERRED INFLOWS, AND NET POSITION OR EQUITY Cash and Investments Cash and cash equivalents on the Statement of Net Position are considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits, and cash with fiscal agent. For the purpose of the proprietary funds “Statement of Cash Flows,” cash and cash equivalents are considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits, cash with fiscal agent, and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. Investments are reported at fair value. Short-term investments are reported at cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on national exchanges are valued at the last reported sales price. Investments that do not have any established market, if any, are reported at estimated fair value. Interfund Receivables, Payables and Activity Interfund activity is reported as loans, services provided, reimbursements or transfers. Loans are reported as interfund receivables and payables as appropriate and are subject to elimination upon consolidation. All other interfund transactions are treated as transfers. Any residual balances outstanding between the governmental activities and business-type activities are reported in the government-wide financial statements as “internal balances.” Receivables In the government-wide financial statements, receivables consist of all revenues earned at year-end and not yet received. Major receivables balances for governmental activities include property taxes, state and utility taxes, franchise taxes, and grants. Business-type activities report utility charges as their major receivables. Prepaids Prepaids are valued at cost, which approximates market. The cost of governmental fund-type prepaids are recorded as expenditures when consumed rather than when purchased. Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaids in both the government-wide and fund financial statements. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 26 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued ASSETS/DEFERRED OUTFLOWS, LIABILITIES/DEFERRED INFLOWS, AND NET POSITION OR EQUITY – Continued Capital Assets Capital assets purchased or acquired with an original cost of $5,000 to $75,000 (see below chart) or more are reported at historical cost or estimated historical cost. Contributed assets are reported at estimated fair market value as of the date received. Additions, improvements and other capital outlays that significantly extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized. Other costs incurred for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. The accounting and financial reporting treatment applied to a fund is determined by its measurement focus. General capital assets are long-lived assets of the City as a whole. Infrastructure such as streets, traffic signals and signs are capitalized. In the case of the initial capitalization of general infrastructure assets (i.e., those reported by the governmental activities) the government chose to include all such items regardless of their acquisition date. The valuation basis for general capital assets are historical cost, or where historical cost is not available, estimated historical cost based on replacement costs. Capital assets in the proprietary funds are capitalized in the fund in which they are utilized. The valuation bases for proprietary fund capital assets are the same as those used for the general capital assets. Donated capital assets are capitalized at estimated fair market value on the date donated. Depreciation on all assets is computed and recorded using the straight-line method of depreciation over the following estimated useful lives: Estimated Useful Capital Asset Life Land $25,000 N/A Land Improvements 25,000 N/A Buildings 35,000 10 - 50 Years Building Improvements 25,000 10 - 20 Years Machinery and Equipment 5,000 5 - 75 Years Vehicles 5,000 5 - 15 Years Software 25,000 2 - 5 Years Infrastructure - Street and Storm Sewer 50,000 10 - 75 Years Infrastructure - Water and Sewer 75,000 10 - 75 Years Capitalized Threshold UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 27 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued ASSETS/DEFERRED OUTFLOWS, LIABILITIES/DEFERRED INFLOWS, AND NET POSITION OR EQUITY – Continued Compensated Absences The City accrues accumulated unpaid vacation and associated employee-related costs when earned (or estimated to be earned) by the employee. In accordance with GASB Statement No. 16, no liability is recorded for nonvesting accumulation rights to receive sick pay benefits. However, a liability is recognized for that portion of accumulated sick leave that is estimated to be taken as “terminal leave” prior to retirement. All vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in the governmental funds only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee resignations and retirements. Assets Held for Others In June of 2004, the City entered into an intergovernmental agreement with Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District for design and construction of the Rob Roy Creek Interceptor. At the date of completion, the Yorkville-Bristrol Sanitary District owns and maintains the Interceptor. All costs associated with the construction of the infrastructure asset are recorded as Assets Held for Others in the City’s financial statements. As of April 30, 2013, the balance of this project was $11,091,000 reported in the Sewer Fund. In connection with this project, the City issued General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005D in the fiscal year 2006 for $11,300,000, which were refunded in 2008 and again in 2011. At April 30, 2013, the outstanding balance of the 2011 refunding bonds is $11,150,000. See Note 3 for more information on this long-term debt issue. Long-Term Obligations In the government-wide financial statements, and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary fund type Statement of Net Position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the effective interest method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount. Bond issuance costs are reported as expenditures/expenses at the time of issuance. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 28 NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued ASSETS/DEFERRED OUTFLOWS, LIABILITIES/DEFERRED INFLOWS, AND NET POSITION OR EQUITY – Continued Net Position In the government-wide financial statements, equity is classified as net position and displayed in three components: Net investment in capital assets—Consists of capital assets including restricted capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation and reduced by the outstanding balances of any bonds, mortgages, notes or other borrowings that are attributable to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of those assets. Restricted—Consists of net position with constraints placed on the use either by (1) external groups such as creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments; or (2) law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislations. Unrestricted—All other net position balances that do not meet the definition of “restricted” or “net investment in capital assets.” NOTE 2 – STEWARDSHIP, COMPLIANCE, AND ACCOUNTABILITY BUDGETARY INFORMATION Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. Annual budgets are adopted for all funds. All annual appropriations lapse at fiscal year end. During the year, several supplementary appropriations were necessary. The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements: • Prior the May 1, the Mayor submits to the City Council the proposed budget for the fiscal year commencing the following May1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. • Public hearings are conducted at the City offices to obtain taxpayer comments. • Prior to May 1, the budget is legally adopted by a vote of the City Council through passage of an ordinance. • The budget officer is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts between departments within any fund; however, any revisions that alter the total expenditures of any fund must be approved by the City Council. DEFICIT FUND EQUITY The Recreation and Municipal Building Funds had deficit fund equity of $301,624 and $571,615, respectively, as of April 30, 2013. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 29 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS The City maintains a cash and investment pool that is available for use by all funds except the pension trust fund. Each fund type's portion of this pool is displayed on the financial statements as "cash and investments.” In addition, investments are separately held by several of the City's funds. The deposits and investments of the pension trust fund are held separately from those of other funds. Permitted Deposits and Investments – Statutes authorize the City to make deposits/invest in commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Agencies, obligations of States and their political subdivisions, credit union shares, repurchase agreements, commercial paper rated within the three highest classifications by at least two standard rating services, Illinois Funds and the Illinois Metropolitan Investment Fund (IMET). The deposits and investments of the Pension Fund are held separately from those of other City funds. Statutes authorize the Pension Fund to make deposits/invest in interest bearing direct obligations of the United States of America; obligations that are fully guaranteed or insured as to the payment of principal and interest by the United States of America; bonds, notes, debentures, or similar obligations of agencies of the United States of America; savings accounts or certificates of deposit issued by banks or savings and loan associations chartered by the United States of America or by the State of Illinois, to the extent that the deposits are insured by the agencies or instrumentalities of the federal government; State of Illinois Bonds; pooled accounts managed by the Illinois Public Treasurer, or by banks, their subsidiaries or holding companies, in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois; bonds or tax anticipation warrants of any county, township, or municipal corporation of the State of Illinois direct obligations of the State of Israel; money market mutual funds managed by investment companies that are registered under the federal Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Illinois Securities Law of 1953 and are diversified, open-ended management investment companies, provided the portfolio is limited to specified restrictions; general accounts of life insurance companies and separate accounts of life insurance companies provided the investment in separate accounts does not exceed ten percent of the pension fund’s net assets. Pension funds of at least 5 million that have appointed an investment advisor may, through that investment advisor, invest up to thirty-five percent of the plan’s net assets in common and preferred stocks that meet specific restrictions. Illinois Funds and IMET are investment pools managed by the Illinois public Treasurer’s Office which allows governments within the State to pool their funds for investment purposes. Although not registered with the SEC, Illinois Funds and IMET operate in a manner consistent with Rule 2a7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Investments in Illinois Funds and IMET are valued at the share price, the price for which the investment could be sold. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 30 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS – Continued City Interest Rate Risk, Credit Risk, Custodial Credit Risk and Concentration Risk Deposits. At year-end, the carrying amount of the City’s deposits for governmental and business-type activities totaled $1,236,296 and the bank balances totaled $1,366,437. Additionally, the City has $2,147,597 invested in the Illinois Fund and $7,783,408 invested in IMET at year-end. Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. The City’s investment policy states that a variety of financial instruments and maturities, properly balanced, will help to insure liquidity and reduce risk or interest rate volatility and loss of principal. The policy does not state specific limits in investment maturities as a means of managing its exposure to fair value losses arising from increasing interest rates. At year-end, the City’s investment in the Illinois Funds and IMET have an average maturity of less than one year. Credit Risk. Credit risk is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment will not fulfill its obligations. Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in management of their own affairs, no for speculation, but for investment, considering the safety of their capital, as well as the probable income to be derived. The standard of prudence to be used by investment officials shall be the ‘prudent person’ standard and shall be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio. At year-end, the City’s investment in the Illinois Funds is rated AAAm by Standard & Poor’s and the City’s investment in the IMET Convenience Fund is rated AAAf by Standard and Poor’s. Custodial Credit Risk. In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the City’s deposits may not be returned to it. The City’s investment policy requires that all amounts in excess of any insurance limits be collateralized by approved securities or surety bonds issued by top- rated insurers, having a value of at least 110% of the deposits. Collateral is required as security whenever deposits exceed the insurance limits of the FDIC. Repurchase agreements must also be collateralized in the amount of 105% of the market value of principal and accrued interest. Collateral shall be held at an independent, third party institution in the name of the City. The third party institution shall comply with all qualifications and requirements asset forth in the Illinois Complied Statutes 30 ILCS 235/6. At year end, all deposits are collateralized. For an investment, this is the risk that in the event of the failure of the counterparty, the City will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. At year-end, the City’s investment in the Illinois Fund and IMET are noncategorizable. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 31 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS – Continued City Interest Rate Risk, Credit Risk, Custodial Credit Risk and Concentration Risk – Continued Concentration Risk. This is the risk of loss attributed to the magnitude of the City’s investment in a single issuer. The City’s investment policy states that a variety of financial instruments and maturities, properly balanced, will help to insure liquidity and reduce risk or interest rate volatility and loss of principal. Diversifying instruments and maturities will avoid incurring unreasonable risks in the investment portfolio regarding specific security types, issuers or individual financial institutions. The City shall diversify to the best of its ability based on the type of funds invested and the cash flow needs of those funds. The City places no limit on the amount the City may invest in any one issuer. At year- end, the City’s investment in Illinois Funds and in IMET represent more than 5 percent of the total cash and investment portfolio. Police Pension Fund Interest Rate Risk, Credit Risk, Custodial Credit Risk and Concentration Risk Deposits. At year-end, the carrying amount of the Fund’s deposits totaled $431,733 and the bank balances totaled $431,733. Investments. At year-end, the Fund has the following investments and maturities: Less Than More Than Investment Type 1 1 to 5 6 to 10 10 U.S. Treasury Notes $724,551 - 404,796 319,755 - U.S. Treasury Strips 161,320 79,919 - 81,401 - U.S. Treasury Bonds 106,547 - - 106,547 - Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.224,755 - 100,099 124,656 - Federal Farm Credit Bureau 110,002 - 110,002 - - Federal National Mortgage Assoc.659,021 161,817 - 340,306 156,898 Government National Mortgage Assoc.30,129 - - - 30,129 Corporate Bonds 311,922 - 282,793 29,129 - 2,328,247 241,736 897,690 1,001,794 187,027 Investment Maturities (in Years) Fair Value UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 32 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS – Continued Police Pension Fund Interest Rate Risk, Credit Risk, Custodial Credit Risk and Concentration Risk – Continued Interest Rate Risk. The Fund’s investment policy states that no more than 5% of plan assets shall be invested in liquid, long-term investments. Such investment may include certificates of deposit and guaranteed insurance contracts. Any other plan holding which would have a noticeable impact on market price in whole or in part is also defined as liquid. Credit Risk. The Fund’s investment policy helps limit its exposure to credit risk by primarily investing in securities issued by the United States Government and/or its agencies that are implicitly guaranteed by the United States Government. The investments in the securities of the United States Government agencies were all rated Triple A or Double A by Standard & Poor’s and by Moody’s Investor Services. The Fund’s policy prescribe to the “prudent person” rule which states, “Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the primary objective of safety as well s the second objective of the attainment of market rates of return. Custodial Credit Risk. The Fund’s investment policy does not address custodial credit risk. Concentration Risk. The Fund’s investment policy does not address concentration risk. In addition to the securities and fair values previously listed, the Fund also has $2,271,589 invested in mutual funds. At year-end, the Fund has over 5 percent of net plan position available for retirement benefits (other than U.S. Government guaranteed obligations) invested in Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund ($590,541). PROPERTY TAXES Property taxes for 2012 attach as an enforceable lien on January 1, 2013, on property values assessed as of the same date. Taxes are levied by December of the subsequent fiscal year (by passage of a Tax Levy Ordinance). Tax bills are prepared by the County and are payable in two installments, on or about June 1, 2013, and September 1, 2013. The County collects such taxes and remits them periodically. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 33 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued CAPITAL ASSETS Governmental Activities Governmental capital asset activity for the year was as follows: Ending Increases Decreases Balances Nondepreciable Capital Assets Land $29,933,179 333,000 - 30,266,179 Construction in Progress 291,113 564,655 101,517 754,251 30,224,292 897,655 101,517 31,020,430 Depreciable Capital Assets Buildings 14,573,556 - - 14,573,556 Equipment 5,809,101 453,251 8,500 6,253,852 Vehicles 2,364,809 60,290 - 2,425,099 Infrastructure 40,688,956 2,587,256 - 43,276,212 63,436,422 3,100,797 8,500 66,528,719 Less Accumulated Depreciation Buildings 2,378,178 291,471 - 2,669,649 Equipment 3,294,294 421,635 8,500 3,707,429 Vehicles 2,213,711 98,908 - 2,312,619 Infrastructure 11,962,935 1,053,178 - 13,016,113 19,849,118 1,865,192 8,500 21,705,810 Total Net Depreciable Capital Assets 43,587,304 1,235,605 - 44,822,909 Total Net Capital Assets 73,811,596 2,133,260 101,517 75,843,339 Beginning Balances Depreciation expense was charged to governmental activities as follows: General Government $58,191 Library 179,525 Parks and Recreation 402,229 Public Safety 67,250 Public Works 1,157,997 1,865,192 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 34 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued CAPITAL ASSETS – Continued Business-Type Activities Business-type capital asset activity for the year was as follows: Ending Increases Decreases Balances Nondepreciable Capital Assets Land $615,376 - - 615,376 Construction in Progress 877,703 114,256 50,108 941,851 1,493,079 114,256 50,108 1,557,227 Depreciable Capital Assets Equipment 18,891,299 - - 18,891,299 Infrastructure 44,712,125 4,829,492 - 49,541,617 63,603,424 4,829,492 - 68,432,916 Less Accumulated Depreciation Equipment 4,787,863 432,103 - 5,219,966 Infrastructure 4,757,336 862,744 - 5,620,080 9,545,199 1,294,847 - 10,840,046 Total Net Depreciable Capital Assets 54,058,225 3,534,645 - 57,592,870 Total Net Capital Assets 55,551,304 3,648,901 50,108 59,150,097 Beginning Balances Depreciation expense was charged to business-type activities as follows: Sewer $489,837 Water 805,010 1,294,847 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 35 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued INTERFUND RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES AND TRANSFERS Interfund Balances The composition of interfund balances as of the date of this report, is as follows: Receivable Fund Payable Fund Amount Parks and Recreation General $8,412 Parks and Recreation Nonmajor Business-Type 308,868 Nonmajor Governmental General 9,036 Nonmajor Governmental Nonmajor Governmental 30,000 Sewer Nonmajor Governmental 568,315 924,631 The purposes of the significant interfund receivables/payables are as follows: • $308,868 due from the Recreation Center Fund (nonmajor business-type fund) to the Parks and Recreation Fund representing cash borrowings which occurred during the year. • $30,000 due from the Motor Fuel Tax Fund (nonmajor governmental fund) to the Citywide Capital Fund (nonmajor governmental fund) representing cash borrowings which occurred during the year. • $568,315 due from Municipal Building Fund (nonmajor governmental fund) to Sewer Fund representing cash borrowings which occurred during the year. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 36 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued INTERFUND RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES AD TRANSFERS – Continued Interfund Transfers Interfund transfers for the year consisted of the following: Transfers In Transfers Out Amount Library General 26,819 Parks and Recreation General 955,886 Nonmajor Governmental General $518,797 Nonmajor Governmental Nonmajor Governmental 2,500 Water Sewer 82,288 1,586,290 Transfers are used to (1) move revenues from the fund that statute or budget requires to collect them to the fund that statute or budget requires to expend them, (2) move receipts restricted to debt service from the funds collecting the receipts to the debt service fund as debt service payments become due, and (3) use unrestricted revenues collected in the general fund to finance various programs accounted for in other funds in accordance with budgetary authorizations. LONG-TERM DEBT Notes Payable The City enters into notes payable to provide funds for acquisition of capital assets. Notes payable have been issued for the governmental activities. Notes payable are direct obligations and pledge the full faith and credit of the City. Notes payable currently outstanding are as follows: Fund Debt Ending Issue Retired by Issuances Retirements Balances Public Works Capital $847,825 - 30,074 817,751 Beginning Balances Betzwiser Development,LLC Adjustable Rate Note Payable of 2008,due in monthly installments of $6858 plus interest at 6.26%to 5 year T-Bill rate plus 3%through October 1, 2028. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 37 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued LONG-TERM DEBT – Continued Notes Payable – Continued Fund Debt Ending Issue Retired by Issuances Retirements Balances Citywide Capital $- 37,850 - 37,850 847,825 37,850 30,074 855,601 Kendall County River Road Bridge Loan Payable of 2013,payable in annual installments equal to one- sixth of the amount borrowed through October 31, 2018. Beginning Balances Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) Loans Payable The City has entered into loan agreements with the IEPA to provide low interest financing for sewer and water improvements. IEPA loans currently outstanding are as follows: Fund Debt Ending Issue Retired by Issuances Retirements Balances Sewer $37,958 - 37,958 - Sewer 724,494 - 88,610 635,884 Water 1,512,866 - 87,753 1,425,113 2,275,318 - 214,321 2,060,997 IEPA (L17-1156300)Loan Payable of 2007,due in seim-annual installments of $28,263 to $61,744 including interest at 2.50%through August 9, 2026. IEPA (L17-013000)Loan Payable of 1993,due in semi-annual installments of $7,478 to $19,147 including interest at 3.58%through January 25, 2013. IEPA (L17-115300)Loan Payable of 2000,due in seim-annual installments of $37,166 to $52,832 including interest at 2.625%through September 6, 2019. Beginning Balances UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 38 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued LONG-TERM DEBT – Continued General Obligation Bonds The City issues general obligation bonds to provide funds for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities. General obligation bonds have been issued for both governmental and business-type activities. General obligation bonds issued for business-type activities are reported in the proprietary funds as they are expected to be repaid from proprietary revenues. General obligation bonds are direct obligations and pledge the full faith and credit of the City. General obligation bonds currently outstanding are as follows: Fund Debt Ending Issue Retired by Issuances Retirements Balances Fox Industrial TIF $75,000 - 75,000 - Sewer 2,520,000 - 170,000 2,350,000 Countryside TIF 3,015,000 - 180,000 2,835,000 Debt Service 2,910,000 - 205,000 2,705,000 Beginning Balances General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2002,due in annual installments of $50,000 to $75,000 plus interest at 3.00%to 4.75% through December 1, 2012. General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005,due in annual installments of $165,000 to $300,000 plus interest at 3.50%to 4.35% through December 1, 2024. General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2004B, due in annual installments of $120,000 to $455,000 plus interest at 2.50%to 4.00%through December 30, 2018. General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005A, due in annual installments of $30,000 to $335,000 plus interest at 4.00%to 4.375%through December 30, 2022. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 39 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued LONG-TERM DEBT – Continued General Obligation Bonds – Continued Fund Debt Ending Issue Retired by Issuances Retirements Balances Library 6,950,000 - 290,000 6,660,000 Water $1,555,000 - 90,000 1,465,000 Library 975,000 - 150,000 825,000 Water 2,950,000 - 10,000 2,940,000 Sewer 11,150,000 - - 11,150,000 32,100,000 - 1,170,000 30,930,000 Beginning Balances General Obligation Refunding Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2011,due in annual installments of $660,000 to $1,100,000 plus interest at 4.280%through December 30, 2025. General Obligation Library Bonds of 2006,due in annual installments of $50,000 to $100,000 plus interest at 4.75%to 4.80%through December 30, 2024. General Obligation Refunding Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2007A,due in annual installments of $10,000 to $750,000 plus interest at 4.00%to 4.25%through December 30, 2022. General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005C, due in annual installments of $35,000 to $150,000 plus interest at 3.50%to 5.50%through December 30, 2024. General Obligation Library Bonds of 2005B,due in annual installments of $25,000 to $760,000 plus interest at 4.00%to 4.75%through December 30, 2024. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 40 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued LONG-TERM DEBT – Continued Debt Certificates The City issues debt certificates to provide funds for the acquisition and construction of major capital facilities. Debt certificates have been issued for both governmental and business-type activities. Debt Certificates issued for business-type activities are reported in the proprietary funds as they are expected to be repaid from proprietary revenues. Debt certificates currently outstanding are as follows: Fund Debt Ending Issue Retired by Issuances Retirements Balances Water $365,000 - 365,000 - Sewer 1,360,000 - 100,000 1,260,000 Water 800,000 - - 800,000 Sewer 545,000 - 175,000 370,000 Debt Service 95,000 - 95,000 - Water 5,390,000 - 355,000 5,035,000 8,555,000 - 1,090,000 7,465,000 Beginning Balances Refunding Debt Certificates of 2006A,due in annual installments of $5,000 to $850,000 plus interest at 4.00%to 4.20%through December 30, 2022. Capital Appreciation Debt Certificates of 2002,due in annual installments of $35,000 to $365,000 plus interest at 2.50%to 4.50% through May 1, 2012. Illinois Rural Bond Bank Debt Certificates of 2003,due in annual installments of $80,000 to $155,000 plus interest at 1.60%to 5.20% through February 1, 2023. Debt Certificates of 2003,due in annual installments of $100,000 to $300,000 plus interest at 3.80%to 5.00% through December 15, 2018. Debt Certificates of 2004C,due in annual installments of $50,000 to $95,000 plus interest at 5.00% through December 30, 2012. Debt Certificates of 2004A,due in annual installments of $135,000 to $190,000 plus interest at 1.40%to 3.60% through December 30, 2014. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 41 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued LONG-TERM DEBT – Continued Other Obligations Other Obligations currently outstanding are as follows: Fund Debt Ending Issue Retired by Issuances Retirements Balances Governmental Activities $1,890 - - 1,890 Beginning Balances Conover Sewer Recapture owed to John Conover as reimbursement for sewer extension,due in one lump sum payment of $1,890 in fiscal year 2023. Long-Term Liability Activity Changes in long-term liabilities during the fiscal year were as follows: Amounts Ending Due within Additions Deductions Balances One Year Governmental Activities Compensated Absences $365,125 59,575 119,149 305,550 61,110 Net Pension Obligation 564,311 89,112 - 653,423 - Net Other Post-Employment Benefit Obligation 9,453 - 1,526 7,927 - Notes Payable 847,825 37,850 30,074 855,601 32,012 General Obligation Bonds 13,925,000 - 900,000 13,025,000 835,000 Debt Certificates 95,000 - 95,000 - - Other Obligations 1,890 - - 1,890 - 15,808,604 186,537 1,145,749 14,849,391 928,122 Beginning Type of Debt Balances UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 42 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued LONG-TERM DEBT – Continued Long-Term Liability Activity – Continued Amounts Ending Due within Additions Deductions Balances One Year Business-Type Activities Compensated Absences $94,081 50,124 100,247 43,957 8,791 IEPA Loans Payable 2,275,318 - 214,321 2,060,997 180,913 General Obligation Bonds 18,175,000 - 270,000 17,905,000 1,050,000 Plus: Unamortized Item Loss on Refunding 472,823 - 77,598 395,225 - Debt Certificates 8,460,000 - 995,000 7,465,000 785,000 Developer Agreements 2,065,958 - 113,424 1,952,534 - 31,543,180 50,124 1,770,590 29,822,713 2,024,704 Beginning Type of Debt Balances For the governmental activities, the compensated absences, the net pension obligation, and the net other post-employment benefit obligation are generally liquidated by the General Fund. The Public Works Capital Fund makes payment on the notes payable. General obligation bonds are being liquidated by the Library, Countryside TIF and Debt Service Funds. Additionally, the Debt Service Fund is making payment on the debt certificate. For the business-type activities, the Sewer, Water, and Recreation Center Funds liquidate compensated absences. The Sewer and Water Funds are making payments on the IEPA loans payable, general obligation bonds, debt certificates and developer agreements. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 43 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued LONG-TERM DEBT – Continued Debt Service Requirements to Maturity The annual debt service requirements to maturity, including principal and interest, are as follows: Interest Interest $32,012 50,283 835,000 567,682 34,074 48,221 870,000 533,714 36,270 46,025 920,000 498,538 38,607 43,689 970,000 461,364 41,094 41,201 1,015,000 422,188 43,741 38,554 1,090,000 380,954 46,560 35,735 1,150,000 332,740 49,559 32,736 1,225,000 281,578 52,752 29,543 1,305,000 226,620 56,151 26,144 1,375,000 168,072 59,769 22,526 1,110,000 105,394 63,619 18,676 1,160,000 53,950 67,718 14,577 - - 72,081 10,214 - - 76,725 5,570 - - 47,019 986 - - Total 817,751 464,680 13,025,000 4,032,794 2028 2029 2027 Fiscal 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2016 General Obligation Bonds Principal Notes Payable Principal Governmental Activities 2014 2015 Year UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 44 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued LONG-TERM DEBT – Continued Debt Service Requirements to Maturity – Continued Interest Interest Interest $180,913 51,168 1,050,000 759,988 785,000 313,854 185,580 46,501 1,175,000 717,520 815,000 283,244 190,365 41,714 1,230,000 670,448 645,000 250,926 195,275 36,805 1,280,000 621,190 675,000 224,412 200,313 31,767 1,340,000 567,868 695,000 196,398 205,480 26,601 1,400,000 512,046 925,000 167,088 157,255 21,300 1,645,000 453,740 985,000 127,674 107,049 17,981 1,710,000 382,074 990,000 85,156 109,742 15,288 1,780,000 307,508 540,000 42,316 112,503 12,527 1,850,000 229,894 410,000 18,580 115,334 9,697 1,150,000 151,106 - - 118,235 6,795 1,195,000 100,056 - - 121,209 3,821 1,100,000 47,080 - - 61,744 772 - - - - Total 2,060,997 322,737 17,905,000 5,520,518 7,465,000 1,709,648 Business-Type Activities IEPA General Obligation Debt Loan Payable Bonds Certificates Year Principal Principal Principal 2014 2015 2016 2017 Fiscal 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Non-Commitment Debt Special service area bonds outstanding as of the date of this report totaled $77,943,000, Kendall Marketplace business district bonds totaled $6,940,000 and Kendall Marketplace sales tax bonds totaled $6,580,000. These bonds are not an obligation of the government and are secured by the levy of an annual tax on the real property within the special service area, business district taxes, and sales taxes, respectively. The government is in no way liable for repayment but is only acting as agent for the property owners in levying/assessing and collecting the tax, and forwarding the collections to bondholders. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 45 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued LONG-TERM DEBT – Continued Legal Debt Margin Chapter 65, Section 5/8-5-1 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes provides, “…no municipality having a population of less than 500,000 shall become indebted in any manner or for any purpose, to an amount, including existing indebtedness in the aggregate exceeding 8.625% on the value of the taxable property therein, to be ascertained by the last assessment for state and county purposes, previous to the incurring of the indebtedness or, until January 1, 1983, if greater, the sum that is produced by multiplying the municipality’s 1978 equalized assessed valuation by the debt limitation percentage in effect on January 1, 1979.” Assessed Valuation - 2012 $443,122,808 Legal Debt Limit - 8.625% of Assessed Value 38,219,342 Amount of Debt Applicable to Limit General Obligation Bonds 22,945,000 Legal Debt Margin 15,274,342 Bond Defeasances During prior years, the City defeased general obligation and revenue bonds by placing the proceeds of new bonds in an irrevocable trust to provide for all future debt service payments on the old bonds. Since the requirements which normally satisfy defeasance have been met, the financial statements reflect satisfaction of the original liability through the irrevocable transfer to an escrow agent of an amount computed to be adequate to meet the future debt service requirements of the issue. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased bonds are not included in the City’s general purpose financial statements. Defeased bonds in the amount of $14,513,116 are still outstanding as of the date of this report. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 46 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued NET POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS Net investment in capital assets was comprised of the following as of April 30, 2013: Governmental Activities Capital Assets - Net of Accumulated Depreciation $75,843,339 Less Capital Related Debt: Notes Payable of 2008 (817,751) Loan Payable of 2013 (37,850) General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005 (2,835,000) General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005A (2,705,000) General Obligation Library Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005B (6,660,000) General Obligation Library Bonds of 2006 (825,000) Net Investment in Capital Assets 61,962,738 Business-Type Activities Capital Assets - Net of Accumulated Depreciation 59,150,097 Less Capital Related Debt: IEPA (L17-115300) Loan Payable of 2000 (635,884) IEPA (L17-1156300) Loan Payable of 2007 (1,425,113) General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2004B (2,350,000) General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005C (1,465,000) General Obligation Refunding ARS Bonds of 2007A (2,940,000) General Obligation Refunding ARS Bonds of 2011 (11,150,000) Illinois Rural Bond Bank Debt Certificates of 2003 (1,260,000) Debt Certificates of 2003 (800,000) Debt Certificates of 2004A (370,000) Refunding Debt Certificates of 2006A (5,035,000) Net Investment in Capital Assets 31,719,100 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 47 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued NET POSITION RESTATEMENTS Beginning net position in the Sewer and Water Funds was restated due to elimination of bond issuance costs through implementation of GASB 63/65. The following is a summary of the net position as originally reported and as restated: Increase Net Position As Restated (Decrease) Sewer $20,066,680 19,741,130 (325,550) Water 20,884,338 20,787,845 (96,493) As Reported FUND BALANCE CLASSIFICATIONS In the governmental funds financial statements, the City considers restricted amounts to have been spent when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available. The City first utilizes committed, then assigned and then unassigned fund balance when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which all three unrestricted fund balances are available. Assigned Fund Balance. The City reports assigned fund balance in the Police Capital (nonmajor), Public Works Capital (nonmajor), Parks and Recreation Capital (nonmajor) and in the Citywide Capital (nonmajor) Funds. The City’s Council/management has assigned these three funds to future library, police, public works and parks and recreation improvement projects and equipment and vehicle purchases based on approved Council/management expenditures as determined through the annual budget process. Committed Fund Balance. The City reports committed fund balance in the Parks and Recreation Capital Fund, a major fund. Formal City Council action, through the passage of an ordinance, is required to establish, modify or rescind a fund balance commitment. The City’s Council, through formal board action as part of the annual budget process, has committed these funds to future recreation programs, facilities and improvements. Minimum Fund Balance Policy. The City’s policy states that the General fund should maintain a minimum unrestricted fund balance of no less than 15% of the annual appropriations budget. Balances in excess of 50% of the appropriations budget can be transferred to other funds or to capital projects at the discretion of the Council. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 48 NOTE 3 – DETAIL NOTES ON ALL FUNDS – Continued FUND BALANCE CLASSIFICATIONS – Continued The following is a schedule of fund balance classifications for the governmental funds as of the date of this report: Parks and Library Recreation Nonmajor Totals Fund Balances Nonspendable Prepaids $139,985 8,195 14,566 11,825 174,571 Restricted Library Operations - 453,630 - - 453,630 Special Service Areas - - - 22,864 22,864 Motor Fuel Tax - - - 1,152,348 1,152,348 Land Cash - - - 121,420 121,420 Tax Increment Financing Districts - - - 1,787,605 1,787,605 Debt Service - - - 12,046 12,046 - 453,630 - 3,096,283 3,549,913 Committed Parks and Recreation - - 305,804 - 305,804 Assigned Capital Projects - - - 504,314 504,314 Unassigned 4,083,835 - - (571,615) 3,512,220 Total Fund Balances 4,223,820 461,825 320,370 3,040,807 8,046,822 General Special Revenue NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION RISK MANAGEMENT The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; natural disasters; and injuries to the City’s employees. The City has purchased insurance from private insurance companies. Risks covered included certain types of liabilities and bonds. Premiums have been displayed as expenditures/expenses in appropriate funds. There were no significant changes in insurance coverages from the prior year and settlements did not exceed insurance coverage in any of the past three fiscal years. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 49 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued CONTINGENT LIABILITIES Litigation The City is a defendant in various lawsuits. Although the outcome of these lawsuits is not presently determinable, in the opinion of the City's attorney, the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the City. Grants Amounts received or receivable from grantor agencies are subject to audit and adjustment by grantor agencies, principally the federal government. Any disallowed claims, including amounts already collected, may constitute a liability of the applicable funds. The amount, if any, of expenditures which may be disallowed by the grantor cannot be determined at this time although the City expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial. COMMITTMENTS Agreements with Developers – Governmental Activities Under a Development/Economic Initiative Agreement entered into in March of 2000, the City agreed to reimburse eligible costs associated with a development located at Route 47 and Route 34. Eligible costs of $2,074,833 and accrued interest at 5% are to be reimbursed from 50% of the sales tax generated in the development, limited to a period of eighteen years. Through April 30, 2013, the City has reimbursed $1,720,811, including $133,441 in the current year. All payments have been recorded as an expenditure of the General Fund. Under a Development and Annexation Agreement entered into in July of 2000, amended in October of 2001, the City agreed to reimburse eligible costs associated with a development located at Route 47 and Kennedy Road. Eligible costs of $8,639,334 are to be reimbursed from 50% of the sales tax generated in the development, limited to a period of ten years. Through April 30, 2013, the City has reimbursed $1,604,136, including $182,764 in the current year. All payments have been recorded as an expenditure of the General Fund. Under a Development/Economic Initiative Agreement entered into in June of 2002, the City agreed to reimburse eligible costs associated with a development located at Route 34 and Cannonball Trail. Eligible costs of $166,055 are to be reimbursed from 50% of the sales tax generated in the development, limited to a period of fifteen years. Through April 30, 2013, the City has reimbursed $125,373, including $17,481 in the current year. All payments have been recorded as an expenditure of the General Fund. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 50 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued COMMITTMENTS – Continued Agreements with Developers – Governmental Activities – Continued Under an Annexation Agreement entered into in April of 2006, the City agreed to reimburse eligible costs associated with a development located at Route 47 between Base Line Road and Corneils Road. Eligible costs are to be reimbursed from 55% of City Admissions Taxes collected, limited to a period of ten years. Through April 30, 2013, the City has reimbursed $204,804, including $119,198 in the current year. All payments have been recorded as an expenditure of the General Fund. The agreement was amended in August of 2011 to rebate 100% of admissions tax received by the City from the developer for a period of ten years, and the admissions tax rate was decreased from 5% to 2.75%. The 100% rebate went into effect beginning with the current fiscal year. Under a Development/Economic Initiative Agreement entered into in January of 2007, the City agreed to reimburse eligible costs associated with a development located at Route 47 and Corneils Road. Eligible costs of $287,392 are to be reimbursed from 50% of the sales tax generated in the development, limited to a period of twenty years. Through April 30, 2013, the City has reimbursed $23,404, including $0 in the current year. All payments have been recorded as an expenditure of the General Fund. Under a Development Agreement entered into in June of 2007, the City agreed to create a business district in the area around Route 34 and Cannonball Trail. Under the agreement, 50% of sales tax and 100% of the business district tax generated in the district are remitted by the City to an escrow agent to pay the debt service on the Revenue Bonds of 2007. The bonds are secured solely by the pledged revenues and are not obligations of the City and are therefore not recorded on the City’s books. All payments have been recorded as an expenditure of the General Fund. Expenditures in the current year were $401,483 for sales taxes and $314,385 in business district taxes. In February of 2011, the City amended a Development/Economic Initiative Agreement dated April 2007. Under the original agreement, the City agreed to reimburse 20% of eligible costs associated with a development located at Route 47 and Fountainview Drive from 50% of the sales tax generated in the development, limited to a period of twenty years. Under the amended agreement, the City will hold the sales tax rebates in an escrow account until certain land improvements has been completed. Through April 30, 2013, the City is holding $3,164 in escrow. No reimbursements have yet been made. Under a Development/Economic Initiative Agreement entered into on December 22, 2011the City agreed to reimburse eligible costs associated with a development located west of Route 47 and north of Cannonball Trail on Boombah Boulevard. Eligible costs of $287,392 are to be reimbursed from 50% of the sales tax generated in the development, limited to a period of ten years. Through April 30, 2013, the City has reimbursed $7,856. All payments have been recorded as an expenditure of the General Fund. Under a Development/Economic Initiative Agreement entered into on September 18, 2012 the City agreed to reimburse eligible costs associated with a development located at 704 East Veterans Parkway. Eligible costs of $30,740 are to be reimbursed from 50% of the sales tax generated in the development, limited to a period of ten years. Through April 30, 2013, the City has reimbursed $686. All payments have been recorded as an expenditure of the General Fund. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 51 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued COMMITTMENTS – Continued Agreements with Developers – Business-Type Activities Under an agreement entered into in the fiscal year ending April 2003, the City and developer of the Windett Ridge subdivision agreed upon an advance of up to $170,000 for sanitary sewer system improvements. The City is required to repay the advance to the developer within a ten year period of receipt of the loan. Under an amendment to the agreement signed in fiscal year ending April 2005, the City and the developer agreed to reduce the balance by the amount of outstanding lot fees due the City. Per the amendment, the new loan amount is $114,600 which is due to the developer by October 21, 2013. This loan is recorded in the Sewer Fund and is to be paid with sewer connection fees. Under an agreement entered into in December of 2002, the City and developer of the Raintree Village subdivision agreed to reimburse the costs of sanitary sewer over-sizing within the development. The amount of eligible expenses to be reimbursed by the City totals $1,154,718, of which $932,309 has been paid through April 30, 2013. The remaining balance, $222,930, is subject to interest based on the twelve month LIBOR. Annual sewer charges assessed on the residents of the subdivision are earmarked to repay this obligation. The related sanitary sewer infrastructure was accepted by the City as an asset in December of 2007. This amount is recorded in the Sewer Fund. Under a planned unit development agreement entered into in June of 2003, the City agreed to reimburse the developer of the Grand Reserve subdivision for regional water improvements required to support the subdivision and the surrounding area. In May of 2009, the two parties agreed upon the repayment of $827,596 of eligible costs due in thirty-six monthly installment of $22,989 beginning December 2009. As of April 30, 2013, the City has repaid $827,596. Water connection fees generated with in specific water pressure zone have been earmarked to repay the developer. As of April 30, 2013, the City had not accepted the water infrastructure assets from the developer. This liability is recorded in the Water Fund. This commitment has been paid in full as of April 30, 2013. Under a reimbursement agreement entered into in August of 2003, the City and the developer of the Fox Hill subdivision agreed to reimburse eligible costs associated with the construction and over-sizing of water and sewer infrastructure lines within the area. Eligible costs are to be paid to the developer within twenty years of the agreement. This agreement was amended in April 2006 to include additional costs. Total eligible costs remain as of April 30, 2013 are $807,847, which accrues compounded interest of 5% annually. Interest for a portion of eligible costs was computed back to January 1, 1995. Total interest to date is $657,009. The amount recorded as a liability, including interest, as of April 30, 2013 is $1,615,004. 52% of this amount is recorded in the Water Fund. The remaining 48% of this amount is recorded in the Sewer Fund. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 52 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS The City contributes to two defined benefit pension plans, the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund, a defined benefit agent multiple-employer public employee retirement system and the Police Pension Plan which is a single-employer pension plan. A separate report is issued for the Police Pension Plan and may be obtained by writing to the City at 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. IMRF does issue a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for the plan as a whole, but not by individual employer. That report may be obtained on-line at www.imrf.org. The benefit, benefit levels, employee contributions, and employer contributions are governed by Illinois Compiled Statutes and can only be amended by the Illinois General Assembly. Plan Descriptions, Provisions and Funding Policies Illinois Municipal Retirement System (IMRF) All employees (other than those covered by the Police Pension plan) hired in positions that meet or exceed the prescribed annual hourly standard must be enrolled in IMRF as participating members. Participating members hired before January 1, 2011 who retire at or after age 60 with 8 years of service are entitled to an annual retirement benefit, payable monthly for life, in an amount equal to 1-2/3 percent of their final rate (average of the highest 48 consecutive months' earnings during the last 10 years) of earnings, for each year of credited service up to 15 years, and 2 percent for each year thereafter. The monthly pension of a member hired before January 1, 2011, shall be increased annually by 3% of the original pension. Employees with at least 8 years of credited service may retire at or after age 55 and receive a reduced benefit. For participating members hired on or after January 1, 2011 who retire at or after age 67 with 10 years of service are entitled to an annual retirement benefit, payable monthly for life in an amount equal to 1- 2/3 percent of their final rate (average of the highest 96 consecutive months’ earnings during the last 10 years) of earnings, for each year of credited service, with a maximum salary cap of $106,800 at January 1, 2011. The maximum salary cap increases each year thereafter. The monthly pension of a member hired on or after January 1, 2011, shall be increased annually, following the later of the first anniversary date of retirement or the month following the attainment of age 62, by the lesser of 3% or ½ of the consumer price index. Employees with at least 10 years of credited service may retire at or after age 62 and receive a reduced benefit. IMRF also provides death and disability benefits. These benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by state statute. Employees participating in the plan are required to contribute 4.50 percent of their annual covered salary to IMRF. The employees’ contribution rate is established by state statute. The City is required to contribute the remaining amount necessary to fund the IMRF plan as specified by statute. For the calendar year 2012 the employer annual required contribution rate was 9.64 percent. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 53 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – Continued Plan Descriptions, Provisions and Funding Policies – Continued Police Pension Plan The Police Pension Plan is a single-employer defined benefit pension plan that covers all sworn police personnel. Although this is a single-employer pension plan, the defined benefits and employee and employer contribution levels are governed by Illinois State Statutes and may be amended only by the Illinois legislature. The City accounts for the plan as a pension trust fund. At April 30, 2012, the date of the most recent actuarial valuation, the Police Pension Plan membership consisted of: Retirees and Beneficiaries Currently Receiving Benefits and Terminated Employees Entitled to Benefits but not yet Receiving Them 6 Current Employees Vested 13 Nonvested 12 31 The following is a summary of the Police Pension Plan as provided for in Illinois State Statutes. The Police Pension Plan provides retirement benefits as well as death and disability benefits. Covered employees hired before January 1, 2011, attaining the age of 50 or more with 20 or more years of creditable service are entitled to receive an annual retirement benefit of ½ of the salary attached to the rank held on the last day of service, or for one year prior to the last day, whichever is greater. The pension shall be increased by 2.5% of such salary for each additional year of service over 20 years up to 30 years, to a maximum of 75% of such salary. Covered employees hired on or after January 1, 2011, attaining the age of 55 with at least 10 years creditable service are entitled to receive an annual retirement benefit of 2.5% of final average salary for each year of service, with a maximum salary cap of $106,800 as of January 1, 2011. The maximum salary cap increases each year thereafter. The monthly benefit of a police officer hired before January 1, 2011, who retired with 20 or more years of service after January 1, 1977 shall be increased annually, following the first anniversary date of retirement and be paid upon reaching the age of at least 55 years, by 3% of the original pension and 3% compounded annually thereafter. The monthly pension of a police officer hired on or after January 1, 2011, shall be increased annually, following the later of the first anniversary date of retirement or the month following the attainment of age 60, but the lesser of 3% or ½ of the consumer price index. Employees with at least 10 years but less than 20 years of creditable service may retire at or after age 60 and receive a reduced benefit. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 54 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – Continued Plan Descriptions, Provisions, and Funding Policies – Continued Police Pension Plan – Continued Covered employees are required to contribute 9.91% of their base salary to the Police Pension Plan. If an employee leaves covered employment with less than 20 years of service, accumulated employee contributions may be refunded without accumulated interest. The City is required to contribute the remaining amounts necessary to finance the plan, including administrative costs, as actuarially determined by an enrolled actuary. By the year 2040 the City's contributions must accumulate to the point where the past service cost for the Police Pension Plan is 90% funded. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Plan Asset Matters Basis of Accounting The financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Employee and employer contributions are recognized as revenues when due, pursuant to formal commitments, as well as statutory or contractual requirements. Benefits and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the terms of the plan. Method Used to Value Investments Investments are reported at fair value. Short-term investments are reported at cost, which approximates fair value. Securities traded on national exchanges are valued at the last reported sales price. Investments that do not have any established market, if any, are reported at estimated fair value. Significant Investments At year-end, the Police Pension Fund has over 5 percent of net position available for retirement benefits (other than U.S. Government guaranteed obligations) invested in Schwab S&P 500 Index Fund ($590,541). Information for IMRF is not available. Related Party Transactions There are no securities of the employer or any other related parties included in net position. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 55 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – Continued Annual Pension Cost and Net Pension Obligation The pension liability for IMRF and the Police Pension Plan is as follows: Police Pension Totals Annual Required Contribution $242,774 542,648 785,422 Interest on Net Pension Obligation 1,190 42,369 43,559 Adjustment to Annual Required Contribution 7,644 (41,331) (33,687) Annual Pension Cost 251,608 543,686 795,294 Actual Contribution 267,471 438,711 706,182 Change in NPO (15,863) 104,975 89,112 NPO - Beginning of Year 15,863 548,448 564,311 NPO - End of Year - 653,423 653,423 IMRF UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 56 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – Continued Annual Pension Cost and Net Pension Obligation – Continued The City’s annual pension cost for the current year and related information for each plan is as follows: Police IMRF Pension Contribution Rates Employer 9.64%20.23% Employee 4.50%9.91% Actuarial Valuation Date 12/31/2012 4/30/2012 Actuarial Cost Method Entry Age Entry Age Normal Normal Amortization Method Level % of Level % of Projected Payroll Projected Payroll Open Basis Closed Basis Remaining Amortization Period 30 Years 29 Years Asset Valuation Method 5-Year Market Smoothed Market Actuarial Assumptions Investment Rate of Return 7.50%7.50% Compounded Compounded Annually Annually Projected Salary Increases .4 to 10.0%5.50% Inflation Rate Included 4.00%3.00% Cost-of-Living Adjustments 3.00%3.00% UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 57 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – Continued Trend Information Employer annual pension cost (APC), actual contributions and the net pension obligation (NPO) are as follows. The NPO is the cumulative difference between the APC and the contributions actually made. Fiscal Year Annual Pension Cost 2011 $310,933 $489,523 (APC)2012 253,636 510,479 2013 251,608 543,686 Actual Contributions 2011 295,402 336,075 2012 253,304 360,356 2013 267,471 438,711 Percentage of APC 2011 100.00%68.65% Contributed 2012 99.87%70.59% 2013 106.30%80.69% Net Pension Obligation 2011 15,531 398,325 2012 15,863 548,448 2013 - 653,423 IMRF Pension Police UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 58 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM – DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS – Continued Funded Status and Funding Progress The City’s funded status for the current year and related information for each plan is as follows: Police IMRF Pension Actuarial Valuation Date 12/31/2012 4/30/2012 Percent Funded 80.33%42.80% Accuarial Accrued Liability for Benefits $5,247,562 $10,463,737 Actuarial Value of Assets $4,215,113 $4,481,601 Over (Under) Funded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL)($1,032,449)($5,982,136) Covered Payroll (Annual Payroll of Active Employees Covered by the Plan)$2,518,404 $1,694,445 Ratio of UAAL to Covered Payroll 41.00%353.04% The schedule of funding progress, presented as Required Supplementary Information (RSI) following the notes to the financial statements, presents multiyear trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets are increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liability for benefits. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 59 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS Plan Descriptions, Provisions, and Funding Policies In addition to providing the pension benefits described, the City offers post-employment health care insurance benefits (OPEB) for its eligible retired employees through a single employer defined benefit plan. The benefits, benefit levels, employee contributions and employer contributions are governed by the City and can be amended by the City through its personnel manual and union contracts. The plan is not accounted for as a trust fund, as an irrevocable trust has not been established to account for the plan. The plan does not issue a separate report. The activity of the plan is reported in the City’s General Fund. The City offers post-employment health care benefits to its retirees. To be eligible for benefits, an employee must qualify for retirement under one of the City’s retirement plans. Current elected officials are eligible if they were elected/appointed prior to April, 2013. All health care benefits are provided through the City’s health insurance plan. The benefit levels are the same as those afforded to active employees. Benefits include general inpatient and outpatient medical services; mental, nervous, and substance abuse care; vision care; dental care; and prescriptions. Upon a retiree reaching 65 years of age, Medicare becomes the primary insurer and the City’s plan becomes secondary. All retirees contribute 100% of the actuarially determined premium to the plan, with the exception of two previous employees for which the City has agreed to pay portions of their post-employment health, dental and vision insurance. For the fiscal year ending April 30, 2013, retirees contributed $57,824 to the plan. Active employees do not contribute to the post-employment health care plan until retirement. At April 30, 2013, membership consisted of: Retirees and Beneficiaries Currently Receiving Benefits and Terminated Employees Entitled to Benefits but not yet Receiving Them 8 Active Employees 78 Total 86 Participating Employers 1 The City does not currently have a funding policy. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 60 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS – Continued Annual OPEB Costs and Net OPEB Obligation The net OPEB obligation (NOPEBO) as of April 30, 2013, was calculated as follows: Annual Required Contribution $36,363 Interest on the Net OPEB Obligation 473 Adjustment to the ARC (316) Annual OPEB Cost 36,520 Actual Contribution 38,046 Increase in the net OPEB Obligation (1,526) Net OPEB Obligation - Beginning of Year 9,453 Net OPEB Obligation - End of Year 7,927 Trend Information The City’s annual OPEB cost, actual contributions, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed and the net OPEB obligation are as follows: Percentage Fiscal of OPEB Year Cost Contributed 2011 $4,145 $1,814 43.76%$7,007 2012 4,260 1,814 42.58%9,453 2013 36,520 38,046 104.18%7,927 Actual Net Cost OPEB Annual Contributions Obligation OPEB Funded Status and Funding Progress Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost contributions of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, presents multiyear trend information that shows whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Notes to the Financial Statements April 30, 2013 61 NOTE 4 – OTHER INFORMATION – Continued OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS – Continued Funded Status and Funding Progress – Continued The funded status of the plan as of April 30, 2012, the date of the latest actuarial valuation, was as follows: Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL)$566,488 Actuarial Value of Plan Assets - Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL)566,488 Funded Ratio (Actuarial Value of Plan Assets/AAL)0.00% Covered Payroll (Active Plan Members)4,553,600 UAAL as a Percentage of Covered Payroll 12.44% Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long-term perspective of the calculations. In the April 30, 2012 actuarial valuation the entry age actuarial cost method was used. The actuarial assumptions included a 5.0% investment rate of return (net of administrative expenses) and an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 8.0%, with an ultimate rate of 6.0%. Both rates include a 3.0% inflation assumption. The actuarial value of assets was not determined as the City has not advance funded its obligation. The plan’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability is being amortized as a level percentage of projected payroll on an open basis. The remaining amortization period at April 30, 2013, was 30 years. SUBSEQUENT EVENT On May 9, 2013, the City issued $6,625,000 of General Obligation Library Refunding Bonds of 2013. The bonds bear interest at a rate of 2.00% to 4.00% and are due in annual installments of $155,000 to $730,000 through December 30, 2024. In December of 2012, the City did not extend the Recreation Center lease for an additional five year period. As a result, the City ceased all Recreation Center activities as of June 30, 2013. The Recreation Center Fund will be closed out by an interfund transfer from the Parks and Recreation Fund in the subsequent fiscal year. REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Required supplementary information includes financial information and disclosures that are required by the GASB but are not considered a part of the basic financial statements. Such information includes: • Schedules of Funding Progress and Employer Contributions  Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund  Police Pension Fund  Other Post-Employment Benefit Plan • Budgetary Comparison Schedules  General Fund  Library – Special Revenue Fund  Parks and Recreation – Special Revenue Fund Notes to the Required Supplementary Information Budgetary Information – Budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. 62 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Funding Progress and Employer Contributions April 30, 2013 Funding Progress (6) Unfunded (Overfunded) Actuarial Accrued Liability as a Actuarial (3)Percentage Valuation Funded of Covered Date Ratio Payroll Dec. 31,(1) ÷ (2)(4) ÷ (5) 2007 $4,137,504 $4,104,243 100.81%$(33,261)$3,271,273 -1.02% 2008 4,165,811 4,949,634 84.16%783,823 3,694,367 21.22% 2009 4,322,149 5,008,192 86.30%686,043 3,638,986 18.85% 2010 4,671,071 5,408,655 86.36%737,584 3,235,515 22.80% 2011 4,416,393 5,169,646 85.43%753,253 2,663,554 28.28% 2012 4,215,113 5,247,562 80.33%1,032,449 2,518,404 41.00% Employer Contributions Fiscal Percent Year Contributed 2008 $248,944 $248,944 100.00% 2009 287,422 287,422 100.00% 2010 302,036 302,036 100.00% 2011 310,933 295,402 95.01% 2012 253,304 253,304 100.00% 2013 267,471 242,774 110.17% Value (2) - (1) of Plan Assets (AAL) - Entry Age Liability Covered Payroll (5) AnnualAccrued Liability (4) Unfunded (Overfunded) Actuarial (1) Actuarial (2) Actuarial Accrued Employer Contributions Annual Required Contribution 63 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Police Pension Fund Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Funding Progress and Employer Contributions April 30, 2013 Funding Progress (6) Unfunded (Overfunded) Actuarial Accrued Liability as a Actuarial (3)Percentage Valuation Funded of Covered Date Ratio Payroll Apr. 30,(1) ÷ (2)(4) ÷ (5) 2007 $2,156,875 $5,728,722 37.65%$3,571,847 $1,573,832 226.95% 2008 2,631,594 7,382,023 35.65%4,750,429 1,789,042 265.53% 2009 2,759,119 8,272,076 33.35%5,512,957 1,926,125 286.22% 2010 3,643,355 9,509,795 38.31%5,866,440 1,819,957 322.34% 2011 4,216,855 10,393,520 40.57%6,176,665 1,890,046 326.80% 2012 4,481,601 10,463,737 42.83%5,982,136 1,694,445 353.04% Employer Contributions Fiscal Percent Year Contributed 2008 $275,144 $339,071 81.15% 2009 297,328 383,502 77.53% 2010 323,291 429,562 75.26% 2011 336,075 481,207 69.84% 2012 360,356 496,952 72.51% 2013 438,711 542,648 80.85% (4) (2)Unfunded (1)Actuarial (Overfunded) Actuarial Accrued Actuarial (5) Value Liability Accrued Annual of Plan (AAL)Liability Covered Assets - Entry Age (2) - (1)Payroll Annual Employer Required Contributions Contribution 64 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Other Post-Employment Benefit Plan Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Funding Progress and Employer Contributions April 30, 2013 Funding Progress (6) Unfunded (Overfunded) Actuarial Accrued Liability as a Actuarial (3)Percentage Valuation Funded of Covered Date Ratio Payroll Apr. 30,(1) ÷ (2)(4) ÷ (5) 2008 $N/A $N/A N/A $N/A $N/A N/A 2009 - 46,747 0.00%46,747 5,483,409 0.85% 2010 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2011 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2012 - 566,488 0.00%566,488 4,553,600 12.44% 2013 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Employer Contributions Fiscal Percent Year Contributed 2008 $N/A $N/A N/A 2009 1,814 4,159 43.62% 2010 1,814 4,145 43.76% 2011 1,814 4,145 43.76% 2012 1,814 4,144 43.77% 2013 38,046 36,363 104.63% The City implemented GASB Statement No. 45 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2009, and had a subsequent actuarial valuation performed for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012. Information for prior years is not available. The City is required to have an actuarial valuation performed triennially. Annual Employer Required Contributions Contribution of Plan (AAL)Liability Covered Assets - Entry Age (2) - (1)Payroll Actuarial Accrued Actuarial (5) Value Liability Accrued Annual (4) (2)Unfunded (1)Actuarial (Overfunded) 65 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS General Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Taxes $8,788,433 8,788,433 9,317,383 Intergovernmental 1,759,600 1,759,600 2,060,738 Licenses, Permits and Fees 169,300 169,300 168,831 Charges for Services 1,178,284 1,178,284 1,199,908 Fines and Forfeitures 201,500 201,500 169,144 Interest 3,100 3,100 7,287 Miscellaneous 210,892 210,892 391,519 Total Revenues 12,311,109 12,311,109 13,314,810 Expenditures General Government 3,640,751 3,640,751 3,296,379 Public Safety 3,840,577 3,840,577 3,550,955 Community Development 461,426 461,426 365,188 Public Works 1,920,452 1,920,452 1,647,589 Total Expenditures 9,863,206 9,863,206 8,860,111 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 2,447,903 2,447,903 4,454,699 Other Financing (Uses) Transfers Out (1,516,661)(1,516,661)(1,501,502) Net Change in Fund Balance 931,242 931,242 2,953,197 Fund Balance - Beginning 1,270,623 Fund Balance - Ending 4,223,820 Budget Original 66 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Library - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Taxes $1,502,988 1,502,988 1,483,545 Intergovernmental 22,200 22,200 24,123 Licenses, Permits and Fees 16,250 16,250 35,200 Charges for Services 17,000 17,000 14,190 Fines and Forfeits 13,000 13,000 9,404 Interest 550 550 1,465 Miscellaneous 15,806 15,806 21,885 Total Revenues 1,587,794 1,587,794 1,589,812 Expenditures Library 805,627 805,627 752,373 Debt Service Principal Retirement 440,000 440,000 440,000 Interest and Fiscal Charges 356,237 356,237 356,237 Total Expenditures 1,601,864 1,601,864 1,548,610 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (14,070)(14,070)41,202 Other Financing Sources Transfers In 41,978 41,978 26,819 Net Change in Fund Balance 27,908 27,908 68,021 Fund Balance - Beginning 393,804 Fund Balance - Ending 461,825 Budget Original 67 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Parks and Recreation - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Charges for Services $220,000 220,000 265,614 Grants and Donations 14,700 14,700 5,569 Interest 200 200 244 Miscellaneous 260,661 260,661 211,246 Total Revenues 495,561 495,561 482,673 Expenditures Parks and Recreation Park Operations 781,806 781,806 754,488 Recreation Operations 724,961 724,961 643,766 Total Expenditures 1,506,767 1,506,767 1,398,254 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,011,206)(1,011,206)(915,581) Other Financing Sources Transfers In 955,886 955,886 955,886 Net Change in Fund Balance (55,320)(55,320)40,305 Fund Balance - Beginning 280,065 Fund Balance - Ending 320,370 Budget Original OTHER SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Other supplementary information includes financial statements and schedules not required by the GASB, nor a part of the basic financial statements, but are presented for purposes of additional analysis. Such statements and schedules include: • Budgetary Comparison Schedules – Major Governmental Funds • Combining Statements – Nonmajor Governmental Funds • Budgetary Comparison Schedules – Nonmajor Governmental Funds • Budgetary Comparison Schedules – Enterprise Funds • Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities – Agency Funds MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS GENERAL FUND The General Fund accounts for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. SPECIAL REVENUE FUND Special Revenue Funds are created to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than fiduciary funds or capital project funds) that are legally restricted to expenditure for specified purposes. Library Fund The Library Fund is used to account for the activity relating to the Yorkville Public Library. Parks and Recreation Fund The Parks and Recreation Fund is used to account for the revenues and expenditures associated with the Yorkville’s Parks and Recreation departments. 68 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS General Fund Schedule of Revenues - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Taxes Property Tax $2,721,487 2,721,487 2,715,518 Sales Tax 2,325,000 2,325,000 2,490,503 Non-Home Rule Sales Tax 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,919,423 Municipal Utility Tax 899,946 899,946 835,972 Cable TV Franchise Tax 230,000 230,000 218,091 Telecommunications Tax 513,500 513,500 499,630 Hotel Tax 50,000 50,000 53,859 Admissions and Amusement Tax 238,500 238,500 260,055 Auto Rental Tax 10,000 10,000 9,633 Business District Tax 300,000 300,000 314,385 Para-Mutuel Tax - - 314 8,788,433 8,788,433 9,317,383 Intergovernmental State Income Taxes 1,320,000 1,320,000 1,587,324 State Use Tax 242,400 242,400 268,285 Township Road and Bridge Tax 170,000 170,000 168,477 Personal Property Replacement Tax 16,000 16,000 15,908 Federal Grants 9,200 9,200 17,131 Miscellaneous 2,000 2,000 3,613 1,759,600 1,759,600 2,060,738 Licenses, Permits and Fees Liquor Licenses 40,000 40,000 39,895 Other Licenses 2,700 2,700 2,336 Building Permits 126,600 126,600 126,600 169,300 169,300 168,831 Charges for Services Garbage Surcharge 1,021,784 1,021,784 1,049,385 Collection Fees - Sanitary District 151,500 151,500 150,423 Police Special Detail 5,000 5,000 100 1,178,284 1,178,284 1,199,908 Budget Original 69 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS General Fund Schedule of Revenues - Budget and Actual - Continued Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Fines and Forfeitures Traffic Fines $95,000 95,000 59,121 Administrative Adjudication 26,000 26,000 36,328 Police Tows 80,000 80,000 73,375 Other 500 500 320 201,500 201,500 169,144 Interest Investment Income 3,100 3,100 7,287 Miscellaneous Reimbursements Legal - - 12,492 Engineering - - 30,004 Traffic Signal 15,000 15,000 20,019 Liability Insurance 5,000 5,000 27,670 Health Insurance Contributions 134,193 134,193 124,990 Cable Consortium 40,000 40,000 17,243 Other 5,699 5,699 26,136 Miscellaneous Income 11,000 11,000 132,965 210,892 210,892 391,519 Total Revenues 12,311,109 12,311,109 13,314,810 Budget Original 70 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS General Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual General Government Administration $782,327 782,327 710,197 Finance 340,535 340,535 297,902 Administrative Services 2,517,889 2,517,889 2,288,280 3,640,751 3,640,751 3,296,379 Public Safety Police Department 3,840,577 3,840,577 3,550,955 Community Development Building and Zoning 461,426 461,426 365,188 Public Works Streets Operations 714,452 714,452 604,113 Health and Sanitation 1,206,000 1,206,000 1,043,476 1,920,452 1,920,452 1,647,589 Total Expenditures 9,863,206 9,863,206 8,860,111 Budget Original 71 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS General Fund Schedule of Detailed Expenditures - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual General Government Administration Salaries - Mayor $11,000 11,000 9,605 Salaries - Liquor Commissioner 1,000 1,000 1,000 Salaries - City Clerk 9,000 9,000 10,137 Salaries - City Treasurer 6,500 6,500 4,267 Salaries - Alderman 50,320 50,320 47,205 Salaries - Administrative 255,000 255,000 268,329 Overtime 575 575 - Retirement Plan Contribution 28,383 28,383 32,561 FICA Contribution 22,500 22,500 23,994 Group Health Insurance 206,373 206,373 166,600 Group Life Insurance 1,657 1,657 1,262 Dental and Vision Insurance 16,819 16,819 13,762 Training and Conference 3,000 3,000 3,510 Travel and Lodging 6,000 6,000 6,310 Publishing and Advertising 1,000 1,000 716 Printing and Duplicating 6,750 6,750 5,356 Telecommunications 15,000 15,000 19,659 Filing Fees 500 500 154 Codification 8,000 8,000 4,904 Postage and Shipping 14,000 14,000 (335) Dues and Subscriptions 16,600 16,600 16,701 Professional Services 20,000 20,000 8,721 Kendall County Paratransit 30,000 30,000 23,550 Utilities 23,100 23,100 16,636 Rental and Lease Purchase 1,900 1,900 2,079 Office Cleaning 14,400 14,400 14,352 Office Supplies 12,000 12,000 9,162 Computer Equipment and Software 850 850 - Repair and Maintenance 100 100 - 782,327 782,327 710,197 Finance Salaries and Wages 185,000 185,000 176,887 Retirement Plan Contribution 18,659 18,659 19,266 FICA Contribution 13,005 13,005 13,410 Group Health Insurance 26,472 26,472 23,908 Group Life Insurance 461 461 357 Budget Original 72 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS General Fund Schedule of Detailed Expenditures - Budget and Actual - Continued Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual General Government - Continued Finance - Continued Dental and Vision Insurance $3,538 3,538 3,385 Training and Conferences 2,000 2,000 1,850 Auditing Services 36,000 36,000 31,000 Travel and Lodging 1,000 1,000 197 Printing and Duplicating 500 500 848 Telecommunications 600 600 989 Postage and Shipping 500 500 920 Dues and Subscriptions 850 850 535 Professional Services 40,000 40,000 20,410 Rental and Lease Purchase 4,900 4,900 1,835 Outside Repair and Maintenance 1,800 1,800 - Office Supplies 2,500 2,500 2,019 Small Tools and Equipment 250 250 86 Computer Equipment and Software 2,500 2,500 - 340,535 340,535 297,902 Administrative Services Police Special Detail Wages 5,000 5,000 100 Retirement Plan Contribution 60,000 60,000 - Group Health Insurance - Retirees 115,833 115,833 88,868 Dental and Vision Insurance - Retirees 7,007 7,007 5,603 Kencom - - 22,000 Employee Assistance 150 150 - Unemployment Insurance 47,143 47,143 7,024 Liability Insurance 332,256 332,256 213,976 Hotel Tax Rebate 45,000 45,000 48,473 City Property Tax Rebate 1,500 1,500 1,196 Sales Tax Rebate 824,000 824,000 745,572 Business District Rebate 300,000 300,000 314,385 Admission Tax Rebate 104,500 104,500 119,199 Bad Debt - - 3,248 Professional Services 500 500 451 Special Counsel 25,000 25,000 2,771 Litigation Counsel 60,000 60,000 44,826 Corporate Counsel 130,000 130,000 81,042 Information Technology Services 140,000 140,000 86,654 Engineering Services 180,000 180,000 406,630 Budget Original 73 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS General Fund Schedule of Detailed Expenditures - Budget and Actual - Continued Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual General Government - Continued Administrative Services - Continued Cable Consortium Fee $85,000 85,000 70,613 Reimbursable Repairs 5,000 5,000 25,649 Contingencies 50,000 50,000 - 2,517,889 2,517,889 2,288,280 Total General Government 3,640,751 3,640,751 3,296,379 Public Safety Police Department Salaries - Police Officers 1,261,000 1,261,000 1,227,993 Salaries - Chief and Deputies 317,000 317,000 274,717 Salaries - Sergeants 430,000 430,000 392,598 Salaries - Police Clerks 135,000 135,000 115,152 Salaries - Crossing Guard 20,000 20,000 19,192 Part Time Salaries 52,500 52,500 54,735 Overtime 90,000 90,000 101,361 Retirement Plan Contribution 15,818 15,818 12,297 FICA Contribution 175,000 175,000 161,039 Employer Contribution - Police Pension 413,354 413,354 438,711 Group Health Insurance 517,950 517,950 417,204 Group Life Insurance 5,635 5,635 4,666 Dental and Vision Insurance 41,700 41,700 37,185 Tuition Reimbursement 2,800 2,800 - Police Commission 4,000 4,000 8,788 Training and Conference 15,000 15,000 9,183 Travel and Lodging 10,000 10,000 2,579 Publishing and Advertising 200 200 359 Printing and Duplicating 4,500 4,500 3,550 Telecommunications 36,500 36,500 26,937 Postage and Shipping 3,000 3,000 1,210 Dues and Subscriptions 1,350 1,350 898 Professional Services 5,000 5,000 8,092 Legal Services 20,000 20,000 - Adjudication Services 20,000 20,000 16,811 New World Live Scan 15,000 15,000 11,660 Kendall Co. - Juve Probation 4,000 4,000 3,406 MDT - Alerts Fee 7,000 7,000 6,660 Budget Original 74 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS General Fund Schedule of Detailed Expenditures - Budget and Actual - Continued Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Public Safety - Continued Police Department - Continued Rental and Lease Purchase $4,500 4,500 5,761 Outside Repair and Maintenance 61,000 61,000 51,153 Wearing Apparel 16,000 16,000 18,710 Office Supplies 4,000 4,000 4,646 Operating Supplies 8,000 8,000 18,356 Computer Equipment and Software 7,000 7,000 3,227 Repair and Maintenance 12,250 12,250 5,767 Community Relations 7,370 7,370 - Supplies - Grant Reimbursement 4,200 4,200 3,025 Gasoline 90,950 90,950 81,459 Ammunition 2,000 2,000 1,868 Total Public Safety 3,840,577 3,840,577 3,550,955 Community Development Building and Zoning Salaries and Wages 195,000 195,000 183,615 Part Time Salaries 53,000 53,000 15,781 Retirement Plan Contribution 26,227 26,227 19,592 FICA Contribution 19,000 19,000 14,716 Group Health Insurance 59,499 59,499 45,833 Group Life Insurance 461 461 511 Dental and Vision Insurance 4,610 4,610 3,763 Training and Conference 1,500 1,500 1,863 Travel and Lodging 1,000 1,000 631 Publishing and Advertising 500 500 291 Printing and Duplicating 4,250 4,250 1,368 Telecommunications 1,500 1,500 2,410 Postage and Shipping 500 500 862 Inspections 25,000 25,000 - Dues and Subscriptions 1,500 1,500 2,803 Professional Services 6,000 6,000 5,692 Legal Services 2,000 2,000 1,869 Rental and Lease Purchase 3,600 3,600 3,155 Economic Development 45,000 45,000 45,000 Office Supplies 500 500 520 Budget Original 75 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS General Fund Schedule of Detailed Expenditures - Budget and Actual - Continued Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Community Development - Continued Building and Zoning - Continued Operating Supplies $3,000 3,000 2,249 Small Tools and Equipment 125 125 60 Computer Equipment and Software 3,500 3,500 9,153 Books and Publications 500 500 382 Gasoline 3,654 3,654 3,069 Total Community Development 461,426 461,426 365,188 Public Works Streets Operations Salaries and Wages 280,000 280,000 263,824 Overtime 15,000 15,000 3,906 Retirement Plan Contribution 31,753 31,753 28,590 FICA Contribution 23,500 23,500 19,795 Group Health Insurance 83,361 83,361 82,763 Group Life Insurance 1,317 1,317 1,251 Dental and Vision Insurance 7,599 7,599 7,267 Training and Conference 2,000 2,000 834 Telecommunications 4,020 4,020 2,395 Property and Building Maintenance Services 20,000 20,000 13,984 Mosquito Control 7,000 7,000 6,730 Sidewalk Program 4,000 4,000 110 Tree and Stump Removal 20,000 20,000 17,080 Professional Services 1,000 1,000 773 Utilities 90,000 90,000 53,803 Rental and Lease Purchase 1,000 1,000 1,181 Outside Repair and Maintenance 35,000 35,000 28,769 Wearing Apparel 4,200 4,200 2,921 Operating Supplies 9,500 9,500 7,364 Small Tools and Equipment 1,750 1,750 2,691 Repair and Maintenance 36,500 36,500 30,984 Property and Building Maintenance Supplies 20,000 20,000 3,894 Gasoline 15,952 15,952 23,204 714,452 714,452 604,113 Budget Original 76 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS General Fund Schedule of Detailed Expenditures - Budget and Actual - Continued Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Public Works - Continued Health and Sanitation Garbage Services $1,200,000 1,200,000 1,039,396 Leaf Pickup 6,000 6,000 4,080 1,206,000 1,206,000 1,043,476 Total Public Works 1,920,452 1,920,452 1,647,589 Total Expenditures 9,863,206 9,863,206 8,860,111 Budget Original 77 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Library - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Taxes Property Tax $1,502,988 1,502,988 1,483,545 Intergovernmental Personal Property Replacement Tax 5,000 5,000 5,271 State Grant 17,200 17,200 18,852 22,200 22,200 24,123 Licenses, Permits and Fees Development Fees 16,250 16,250 35,200 Charges for Services Copy Fees 3,000 3,000 2,748 Fees for Programs 2,000 2,000 1,008 Library Subscription Cards 12,000 12,000 10,434 17,000 17,000 14,190 Fines and Forfeitures 13,000 13,000 9,404 Interest 550 550 1,465 Miscellaneous Rental Income 6,500 6,500 6,440 Memorials and Gifts 2,000 2,000 5,201 Miscellaneous Income 7,306 7,306 10,244 15,806 15,806 21,885 Total Revenues 1,587,794 1,587,794 1,589,812 Budget Original 78 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Library - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Library Salaries and Wages $245,000 245,000 244,847 Part Time Salaries 195,000 195,000 175,436 Retirement Plan Contribution 26,692 26,692 26,152 FICA Contribution 38,000 38,000 31,483 Group Health Insurance 102,877 102,877 85,076 Group Life Insurance 1,410 1,410 1,027 Dental and Vision Insurance 7,596 7,596 6,593 Unemployment Insurance 4,286 4,286 2,435 Liability Insurance 37,692 37,692 24,947 Travel and Lodging 500 500 798 Publishing and Advertising 100 100 22 Telecommunications 8,500 8,500 10,982 Postage and Shipping 1,000 1,000 244 Dues and Subscriptions 14,000 14,000 8,379 Professional Services 29,000 29,000 38,778 Legal Services 2,000 2,000 360 Automation 35,000 35,000 30,199 Utilities 15,750 15,750 10,508 Outside Repair and Maintenance 5,000 5,000 3,632 Office Supplies 8,000 8,000 5,497 Operating Supplies 7,500 7,500 7,738 Computer Equipment and Software - - 4,703 Repair and Maintenance - - 881 Library Programming 2,000 2,000 875 DVD's 2,000 2,000 4,189 Books - Development Fee 13,474 13,474 21,391 Memorials and Gifts 2,000 2,000 5,201 Miscellaneous 250 250 - Budget Original 79 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Library - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual - Continued Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Library - Continued Contingencies $1,000 1,000 - Total Library 805,627 805,627 752,373 Debt Service Principal Retirement 440,000 440,000 440,000 Interest and Fiscal Charges 356,237 356,237 356,237 Total Debt Service 796,237 796,237 796,237 Total Expenditures 1,601,864 1,601,864 1,548,610 Budget Original 80 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Parks and Recreation - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Charges for Services Fees for Programs $190,000 190,000 233,145 Concessions 30,000 30,000 32,469 Total Charges for Services 220,000 220,000 265,614 Grants and Donations Donations 14,700 14,700 5,569 Interest 200 200 244 Miscellaneous Rental Income 73,000 73,000 67,310 Hometown Days Revenue 175,000 175,000 119,235 Insurance Reimbursements 11,661 11,661 12,521 Miscellaneous Income 1,000 1,000 12,180 Total Miscellaneous 260,661 260,661 211,246 Total Revenue 495,561 495,561 482,673 Budget Original 81 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Parks and Recreation - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Parks and Recreation Park Operations Salaries and Wages $410,000 410,000 400,384 Part Time Salaries 17,000 17,000 17,932 Overtime 3,000 3,000 1,431 Retirement Plan Contribution 43,693 43,693 43,342 FICA Contribution 34,000 34,000 31,109 Group Health Insurance 126,842 126,842 110,141 Group Life Insurance 1,208 1,208 936 Dental and Vision Insurance 10,283 10,283 8,886 Training and Conferences 2,600 2,600 1,333 Travel and Lodging 750 750 328 Telecommunications 3,780 3,780 3,863 Professional Services 4,500 4,500 2,280 Legal Services 4,000 4,000 5,938 Rental and Lease Purchase 2,500 2,500 620 Outside Repairs and Maintenance 17,500 17,500 26,194 Wearing Apparel 4,100 4,100 4,602 Office Supplies 300 300 167 Operating Supplies 22,500 22,500 17,900 Small Tools and Equipment 2,250 2,250 3,093 Computer Equipment and Software 500 500 - Repairs and Maintenance 50,500 50,500 54,036 Gasoline 20,000 20,000 19,973 Total Park Operations 781,806 781,806 754,488 Recreation Operations Salaries and Wages 185,000 185,000 202,126 Part Time Salaries 25,000 25,000 11,457 Overtime 300 300 - Concession Wages 12,500 12,500 8,341 Preschool Wages 25,000 25,000 18,431 Instructor Wages 25,000 25,000 11,047 Retirement Plan Contribution 19,884 19,884 24,704 FICA Contribution 16,000 16,000 18,637 Group Health Insurance 41,094 41,094 42,511 Budget Original 82 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Parks and Recreation - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual - Continued Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Parks and Recreation - Continued Recreation Operations - Continued Group Life Insurance $473 473 440 Dental and Vision Insurance 3,000 3,000 2,862 Training and Conferences 2,000 2,000 1,144 Travel and Lodging 1,000 1,000 453 Publishing and Advertising 27,000 27,000 24,745 Telecommunications 4,300 4,300 2,922 Scholarships 2,500 2,500 803 Postage and Shipping 8,000 8,000 2,188 Dues and Subscriptions 1,500 1,500 1,454 Professional Services 60,000 60,000 60,998 Utilities 23,100 23,100 12,869 Rental and Lease Purchase 4,500 4,500 2,408 Outside Repairs and Maintenance 1,000 1,000 50 Program Refunds 7,000 7,000 9,033 Hometown Days Expenditures 140,000 140,000 91,712 Program Supplies 55,000 55,000 50,603 Concession Supplies 18,000 18,000 17,714 Office Supplies 3,000 3,000 2,503 Operating Supplies 5,500 5,500 19,426 Small Tools and Equipment 2,000 2,000 - Computer Equipment and Software 500 500 616 Repairs and Maintenance 2,000 2,000 132 Books and Publications 100 100 - Supplies - Grant Reimbursable 500 500 - Gasoline 3,210 3,210 1,437 Total Recreation Operations 724,961 724,961 643,766 Total Expenditures 1,506,767 1,506,767 1,398,254 Budget Original NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS COMBINING STATEMENTS 83 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Combining Balance Sheet Nonmajor Governmental Funds April 30, 2013 Debt Capital Service Projects Totals ASSETS Cash and Investments $3,138,764 12,046 822,641 3,973,451 Receivables - Net of Allowances Property Taxes - 328,179 - 328,179 Accounts - - 44,704 44,704 Other Taxes 29,100 - - 29,100 Due from Other Funds 9,036 - 30,000 39,036 Prepaids 11,825 - - 11,825 Total Assets 3,188,725 340,225 897,345 4,426,295 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable 62,663 - 112,256 174,919 Other Liabilities - - 284,075 284,075 Due to Other Funds 30,000 - 568,315 598,315 Total Liabilities 92,663 - 964,646 1,057,309 Property Taxes - 328,179 - 328,179 Total Liabilities and Deferred Inflows of Resources 92,663 328,179 964,646 1,385,488 Nonspendable 11,825 - - 11,825 Restricted 3,084,237 12,046 - 3,096,283 Assigned - - 504,314 504,314 Unassigned - - (571,615)(571,615) Total Fund Balances 3,096,062 12,046 (67,301)3,040,807 Total Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Fund Balances 3,188,725 340,225 897,345 4,426,295 Special Revenue FUND BALANCES DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES 84 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Nonmajor Governmental Funds Year Ended April 30, 2013 Debt Capital Service Projects Totals Revenues Taxes $51,297 324,762 - 376,059 Intergovernmental 915,219 - 61,635 976,854 Licenses, Permits and Fees - 4,694 191,993 196,687 Fines and Forfeits - - 16,739 16,739 Grants and Donations 68,768 - - 68,768 Interest 5,952 610 810 7,372 Miscellaneous 258 - 27,698 27,956 Total Revenues 1,041,494 330,066 298,875 1,670,435 Expenditures General Government 21,018 - 180,707 201,725 Parks and Recreation 52,570 - - 52,570 Public Safety - - 17,710 17,710 Public Works 168,008 - 26,198 194,206 Capital Outlay 198,957 - 373,065 572,022 Debt Service Principal Retirement 180,000 375,000 30,074 585,074 Interest and Fiscal Charges 125,042 129,995 52,221 307,258 Total Expenditures 745,595 504,995 679,975 1,930,565 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 295,899 (174,929)(381,100)(260,130) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Disposal of Capital Assets 5,000 - 200 5,200 Debt Issuance - - 37,850 37,850 Transfers In - 99,465 421,832 521,297 Transfers Out - - (2,500)(2,500) 5,000 99,465 457,382 561,847 Net Change in Fund Balances 300,899 (75,464)76,282 301,717 Fund Balances - Beginning 2,795,163 87,510 (143,583)2,739,090 Fund Balances - Ending 3,096,062 12,046 (67,301)3,040,807 Special Revenue NONMAJOR SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special Revenue Funds are created to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources (other than fiduciary funds or capital project funds) that are legally restricted to expenditure for specified purposes. Fox Hill Special Service Area Fund The Fox Hill Special Service Area Fund is used to account for the revenues and expenditures associated with the maintenance of the common areas of the Fox Hill Estates subdivision. Sunflower Special Service Area Fund The Sunflower Special Service Fund is used to account for revenues and expenditures associated with the maintenance of the common areas of the Sunflower Estates subdivision. Motor Fuel Tax Fund The Motor Fuel Tax Fund is used to account for allotments of motor fuel taxes from the State of Illinois made on per capita basis. These taxes are to be used to construct and maintain street, traffic signals and signs. Land Cash Fund The Land Cash Fund is used to account for the revenues and expenditures associated with the construction of park facilities. Countryside TIF Fund The Countryside TIF Fund is used to account for the accumulation of monies for the payment of the 2005 General Obligation Bond Series. These bonds were issued to finance future retail development at Countryside Center. Downtown TIF Fund The Downtown TIF Fund is used to account for the revenues and expenditures associated with the development activities of the downtown area. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Nonmajor Governmental - Special Revenue Funds Combining Balance Sheet April 30, 2013 See Following Page 85 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Nonmajor Governmental - Special Revenue Funds Combining Balance Sheet April 30, 2013 Sunflower Special Service Area Cash and Investments $15,309 7,936 Receivables - Net of Allowances Other Taxes - - Due from Other Funds - - Prepaids - - Total Assets 15,309 7,936 Accounts Payable 185 196 Due to Other Funds - - Total Liabilities 185 196 Nonspendable - - Restricted 15,124 7,740 Total Fund Balances 15,124 7,740 Total Liabilities and Fund Balances 15,309 7,936 FUND BALANCES LIABILITIES Fox Hill Special Service Area ASSETS 86 Motor Fuel Land Countryside Downtown Tax Cash TIF TIF Totals 1,176,095 121,420 1,572,335 245,669 3,138,764 29,100 - - - 29,100 9,036 - - - 9,036 10,158 - - 1,667 11,825 1,224,389 121,420 1,572,335 247,336 3,188,725 31,883 - - 30,399 62,663 30,000 - - - 30,000 61,883 - - 30,399 92,663 10,158 - - 1,667 11,825 1,152,348 121,420 1,572,335 215,270 3,084,237 1,162,506 121,420 1,572,335 216,937 3,096,062 1,224,389 121,420 1,572,335 247,336 3,188,725 87 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Nonmajor Governmental - Special Revenue Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Year Ended April 30, 2013 Sunflower Special Service Area Revenues Taxes $3,786 7,530 Intergovernmental - - Grants and Donations - - Interest 10 14 Miscellaneous - - Total Revenues 3,796 7,544 Expenditures General Government - - Parks and Recreation - - Public Works 5,743 11,992 Capital Outlay - - Debt Service Principal Retirement - - Interest and Fiscal Charges - - Total Expenditures 5,743 11,992 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,947)(4,448) Other Financing Sources Disposal of Capital Assets - - Net Change in Fund Balances (1,947)(4,448) Fund Balances - Beginning 17,071 12,188 Fund Balances - Ending 15,124 7,740 Service Area Fox Hill Special 88 Motor Fuel Land Countryside Downtown Tax Cash TIF TIF Totals - - - 39,981 51,297 515,219 400,000 - - 915,219 - 68,768 - - 68,768 3,368 - 2,132 428 5,952 258 - - - 258 518,845 468,768 2,132 40,409 1,041,494 - - 2,627 18,391 21,018 - 52,570 - - 52,570 150,273 - - - 168,008 130,923 - - 68,034 198,957 - - 180,000 - 180,000 - - 125,042 - 125,042 281,196 52,570 307,669 86,425 745,595 237,649 416,198 (305,537)(46,016)295,899 - - - 5,000 5,000 237,649 416,198 (305,537)(41,016)300,899 924,857 (294,778)1,877,872 257,953 2,795,163 1,162,506 121,420 1,572,335 216,937 3,096,062 89 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Fox Hill Special Service Area - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Taxes Property Tax $3,786 3,786 3,786 Interest - - 10 Total Revenues 3,786 3,786 3,796 Expenditures Public Works Outside Repair and Maintenance 4,500 5,743 5,743 Net Change in Fund Balance (714)(1,957)(1,947) Fund Balance - Beginning 17,071 Fund Balance - Ending 15,124 Budget Original 90 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Sunflower Special Service Area - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Taxes Property Tax $7,531 7,531 7,530 Interest - - 14 Total Revenues 7,531 7,531 7,544 Expenditures Public Works Outside Repair and Maintenance 9,986 11,992 11,992 Net Change in Fund Balance (2,455)(4,461)(4,448) Fund Balance - Beginning 12,188 Fund Balance - Ending 7,740 Budget Original 91 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Motor Fuel Tax - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Intergovernmental $454,197 454,197 515,219 Interest 350 350 3,368 Miscellaneous - - 258 Total Revenues 454,547 454,547 518,845 Expenditures Public Works Supplies 341,960 341,960 150,273 Capital Outlay Streets and Alleys 231,900 231,900 130,923 Total Expenditures 573,860 573,860 281,196 Net Change in Fund Balance (119,313)(119,313)237,649 Fund Balance - Beginning 924,857 Fund Balance - Ending 1,162,506 Budget Original 92 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Land Cash - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Intergovernmental State Grants $400,000 400,000 400,000 Grants and Donations Autumn Creek 20,000 20,000 66,662 Country Hills - - 1,538 Blackberry Woods 500 500 568 Total Revenues 420,500 420,500 468,768 Expenditures Parks and Recreation Hopkins Park 120,000 120,000 - Raintree Village 191,825 191,825 40,570 Mosier Holding Costs 12,000 12,000 12,000 Total Expenditures 323,825 323,825 52,570 Net Change in Fund Balance 96,675 96,675 416,198 Fund Balance - Beginning (294,778) Fund Balance - Ending 121,420 Budget Original 93 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Countryside TIF - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Taxes Property Taxes $4,500 - - Interest 2,000 2,000 2,132 Total Revenues 6,500 2,000 2,132 Expenditures General Government Administrative Fees 1,000 2,628 2,627 Debt Service Principal Retirement 180,000 180,000 180,000 Interest and Fiscal Charges 125,043 125,043 125,042 Total Expenditures 306,043 307,671 307,669 Net Change in Fund Balance (299,543)(305,671)(305,537) Fund Balance - Beginning 1,877,872 Fund Balance - Ending 1,572,335 Budget Original 94 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Downtown TIF - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Actual Actual Revenues Taxes Property Taxes $70,000 70,000 39,981 Interest 150 150 428 Total Revenues 70,150 70,150 40,409 Expenditures General Government Administrative Fees 1,500 3,951 3,951 Legal Services 10,000 14,440 14,440 Capital Outlay Project Costs 10,000 56,367 56,367 Route 47 Expansion 20,000 11,667 11,667 Total Expenditures 41,500 86,425 86,425 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 28,650 (16,275)(46,016) Other Financing Sources Disposal of Capital Assets - - 5,000 Net Change in Fund Balance 28,650 (16,275)(41,016) Fund Balance - Beginning 257,953 Fund Balance - Ending 216,937 Budget Original NONMAJOR DEBT SERVICE FUND The Debt Service Fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, general long-term debt principal and interest. 95 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Debt Service Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Taxes Property Taxes $326,379 326,379 324,762 Licenses, Permits and Fees Recapture Fees 1,000 1,000 4,694 Interest 300 300 610 Total Revenues 327,679 327,679 330,066 Expenditures Debt Service Principal 375,000 375,000 375,000 Interest and Fiscal Charges 130,370 130,370 129,995 Total Expenditures 505,370 505,370 504,995 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (177,691)(177,691)(174,929) Other Financing Sources Transfers In 99,465 99,465 99,465 Net Change in Fund Balance (78,226)(78,226)(75,464) Fund Balance - Beginning 87,510 Fund Balance - Ending 12,046 Budget Original NONMAJOR CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Capital Projects Funds are created to account for all resources used for the acquisition of capital facilities by a governmental unit except those financed by Proprietary Funds. Municipal Building Fund The Municipal Building Fund is used to account for financial resources accumulated to finance capital improvements to City buildings. Police Capital Fund The Police Capital Fund is used to account for financial resources accumulated to purchase public safety vehicles and equipment. Public Works Capital Fund The Public Works Capital Fund is used to account for financial resources accumulated to purchase vehicles, equipment and other capital assets for use in the Public Works department. Parks and Recreation Capital Fund The Parks and Recreation Capital Fund is used to account for financial resources accumulated for land improvements and to purchase equipment used for the maintenance of this improved park land and open space. Citywide Capital Fund The Citywide Capital Fund is used to account for financial resources accumulated for maintenance of public infrastructure and to fund new capital improvements that benefit the public. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Nonmajor Governmental - Capital Projects Funds Combining Balance Sheet April 30, 2013 See Following Page 96 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Nonmajor Governmental - Capital Projects Funds Combining Balance Sheet April 30, 2013 Cash and Investments $- Receivables - Net of Allowances Accounts - Due to From Funds - Total Assets - Accounts Payable - Other Liabilities 3,300 Due to Other Funds 568,315 Total Liabilities 571,615 Assigned - Unassigned (571,615) Total Fund Balances (571,615) Total Liabilities and Fund Balances - FUND BALANCES Municipal Building ASSETS LIABILITIES 97 Public Parks and Police Works Recreation Citywide Capital Capital Capital Capital Totals 111,640 37,799 204,930 468,272 822,641 832 - - 43,872 44,704 - - - 30,000 30,000 112,472 37,799 204,930 542,144 897,345 5,785 - 10,845 95,626 112,256 - 15,400 147,583 117,792 284,075 - - - - 568,315 5,785 15,400 158,428 213,418 964,646 106,687 22,399 46,502 328,726 504,314 - - - - (571,615) 106,687 22,399 46,502 328,726 (67,301) 112,472 37,799 204,930 542,144 897,345 98 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Nonmajor Governmental - Capital Projects Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Year Ended April 30, 2013 Revenues Intergovernmental $- Licenses, Permits and Fees 12,859 Fines and Forfeits - Interest - Miscellaneous - Total Revenues 12,859 Expenditures General Government 5,100 Public Safety - Public Works - Capital Outlay - Debt Service Principal Retirement - Interest and Fiscal Charges - Total Expenditures 5,100 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 7,759 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Disposal of Capital Assets - Debt Issuance - Transfers In - Transfers Out - - Net Change in Fund Balances 7,759 Fund Balances - Beginning (579,374) Fund Balances - Ending (571,615) Municipal Building 99 Public Parks and Police Works Recreation Citywide Capital Capital Capital Capital Totals - - - 61,635 61,635 23,359 57,800 3,300 94,675 191,993 16,739 - - - 16,739 37 17 513 243 810 - 7,691 - 20,007 27,698 40,135 65,508 3,813 176,560 298,875 - - - 175,607 180,707 17,710 - - - 17,710 - 26,198 - - 26,198 145,176 - 17,284 210,605 373,065 - 30,074 - - 30,074 - 52,221 - - 52,221 162,886 108,493 17,284 386,212 679,975 (122,751)(42,985)(13,471)(209,652)(381,100) 200 - - - 200 - - - 37,850 37,850 - 2,500 - 419,332 421,832 - - (2,500)- (2,500) 200 2,500 (2,500)457,182 457,382 (122,551)(40,485)(15,971)247,530 76,282 229,238 62,884 62,473 81,196 (143,583) 106,687 22,399 46,502 328,726 (67,301) 100 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Municipal Building- Capital Projects Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Licenses, Permits and Fees Build Program $- - 5,100 Development Fees 5,250 5,250 7,759 Total Revenues 5,250 5,250 12,859 Expenditures General Government Build Program - 5,100 5,100 Net Change in Fund Balance 5,250 150 7,759 Fund Balance - Beginning (579,374) Fund Balance - Ending (571,615) Budget Original 101 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Police Capital - Capital Projects Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Licenses, Permits and Fees Development Fees $10,500 10,500 23,359 Weather Warning Siren Fees 6,000 6,000 - Fines and Forfeits DUI Fines 6,000 6,000 6,949 Electronic Citations 650 650 790 Seized Vehicle Fees 5,000 5,000 9,000 Interest 50 50 37 Total Revenues 28,200 28,200 40,135 Expenditures Public Safety Contractual Services 12,500 17,710 17,710 Supplies 2,500 - - Capital Outlay Equipment 20,000 105,725 105,725 Vehicles 25,000 39,451 39,451 Total Expenditures 60,000 162,886 162,886 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (31,800)(134,686)(122,751) Other Financing Sources Disposal of Capital Assets 1,000 1,000 200 Net Change in Fund Balance (30,800)(133,686)(122,551) Fund Balance - Beginning 229,238 Fund Balance - Ending 106,687 Budget Original 102 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Public Works Capital - Capital Projects Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Licenses, Permits and Fees Engineering Capital Fee $6,500 6,500 6,600 Development Fees 24,500 24,500 27,060 Build Program - - 24,140 Interest - - 17 Miscellaneous 20,000 20,000 7,691 Total Revenues 51,000 51,000 65,508 Expenditures Public Works Contractual Services 10,500 10,500 2,058 Build Program - - 24,140 Supplies 2,000 2,000 - Capital Outlay Equipment 75,000 75,000 - Debt Service Principal Retirement 30,074 30,074 30,074 Interest and Fiscal Charges 52,221 52,221 52,221 Total Expenditures 169,795 169,795 108,493 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (118,795)(118,795)(42,985) Other Financing Sources Transfers In 2,500 2,500 2,500 Net Change in Fund Balance (116,295)(116,295)(40,485) Fund Balance - Beginning 62,884 Fund Balance - Ending 22,399 Budget Original 103 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Parks and Recreation Capital - Capital Projects Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Licenses, Permits and Fees Parks Capital Fee $3,250 3,250 3,300 Interest 250 250 513 Miscellaneous 40,000 40,000 - Total Revenues 43,500 43,500 3,813 Expenditures Capital Outlay Equipment 40,000 40,000 17,284 Raintree Park 10,000 10,000 - Total Expenditures 50,000 50,000 17,284 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (6,500)(6,500)(13,471) Other Financing (Uses) Transfers Out (2,500)(2,500)(2,500) Net Change in Fund Balance (9,000)(9,000)(15,971) Fund Balance - Beginning 62,473 Fund Balance - Ending 46,502 Budget Original 104 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Citywide Capital - Capital Projects Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Revenues Intergovernmental Grants $231,000 231,000 61,635 Licenses, Permits and Fees Building Permits 13,400 13,400 10,660 Build Program - - 80,880 Development Fees 20,000 20,000 3,135 Road Contribution Fee 20,000 20,000 - Interest - - 243 Miscellaneous - - 20,007 Total Revenues 284,400 284,400 176,560 Expenditures General Government Build Program - - 80,880 Contractual Services 100,000 100,000 94,727 Capital Outlay Road Resurfacing 100,000 100,000 - River Road Bridge 600,000 600,000 152,707 Safe Routes to School 231,000 231,000 37,891 Kennedy Road Bike Trail 9,500 9,500 20,007 Total Expenditures 1,040,500 1,040,500 386,212 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (756,100)(756,100)(209,652) Other Financing Sources Debt Issuance 600,000 600,000 37,850 Transfers In 419,332 419,332 419,332 1,019,332 1,019,332 457,182 Net Change in Fund Balance (336,768)(336,768)247,530 Fund Balance - Beginning 81,196 Fund Balance - Ending 328,726 Budget Original ENTERPRISE FUNDS Enterprise Funds are used to account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises where the intent is that costs of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges; or where it has been decided that periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and/or net income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability, or other purpose. Sewer Fund The Sewer Fund is used to account for the operation and sewer infrastructure maintenance of the City-owned sewer system, as well as the construction of new sewer systems within City limits. Revenues are generated through a user maintenance fee. Water Fund The Water Fund is used to account for the operation and water infrastructure maintenance of the City-owned water distribution system, as well as the construction of new water systems. Revenues are generated through charges based on water consumption and user maintenance fees. Recreation Center Fund The Recreation Center Fund is used to account for the revenues and expenses of the recreation center which is operated by the Parks and Recreation department. Revenues are generated through user fees. 105 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Sewer - Enterprise Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Operating Revenues Charges for Services $728,280 728,280 744,820 Operating Expenses Operations 1,296,477 1,296,477 425,287 Depreciation and Amortization - - 496,077 Total Operating Expenses 1,296,477 1,296,477 921,364 Operating Income (Loss)(568,197)(568,197)(176,544) Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) Interest Income 3,000 3,000 7,339 Connection Fees 640,100 640,100 613,600 Other Income 268,437 268,437 135,326 Interest Expense (516,445)(516,445)(708,659) 395,092 395,092 47,606 Income (Loss) Before Contributions and Transfers (173,105)(173,105)(128,938) Capital Contributions - - 3,343,351 Transfers Out (82,288)(82,288)(82,288) Change in Net Position (255,393)(255,393)3,132,125 Net Position - Beginning as Restated 19,741,130 Net Position - Ending 22,873,255 Budget Original 106 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Water - Enterprise Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Operating Revenues Charges for Services $2,401,621 2,401,621 2,679,547 Operating Expenses Operations 2,597,721 2,597,721 1,239,702 Depreciation and Amortization - - 876,368 Total Operating Expenses 2,597,721 2,597,721 2,116,070 Operating Income (Loss)(196,100)(196,100)563,477 Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) Interest Income 300 300 2,203 Connection Fees 126,250 126,250 143,810 Other Income 190,920 190,920 106,065 Interest Expense (488,262)(488,262)(522,182) (170,792)(170,792)(270,104) Income (Loss) Before Contributions and Transfers (366,892)(366,892)293,373 Capital Contributions - - 1,486,140 Transfers In 82,288 82,288 82,288 Change in Net Position (284,604)(284,604)1,861,801 Net Position - Beginning as Restated 20,787,845 Net Position - Ending 22,649,646 Budget Original 107 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Recreation Center - Enterprise Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position - Budget and Actual Year Ended April 30, 2013 Final Actual Operating Revenues Charges for Services $607,000 607,000 493,617 Operating Expenses Operations 703,633 703,633 592,707 Operating Income (Loss)(96,633)(96,633)(99,090) Nonoperating Revenues Other Income 15,500 15,500 17,467 Change in Net Position (81,133)(81,133)(81,623) Net Position - Beginning (220,001) Net Position - Ending (301,624) Budget Original AGENCY FUNDS Agency funds are established to administer resources received and held by the City as the trustee. Use of these funds facilitates the discharge of responsibilities placed upon the governmental unit by virtue of law or other similar authority. Developer Deposit Fund The Developer Deposit Fund is used to account for developer deposits that are used to reimburse the City for all expenses incurred as a result of processing developer applications and requests. Escrow Deposit Fund The Escrow Deposit Fund is used to account for various funds collected on behalf of other governmental agencies. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Agency Funds Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities Year Ended April 30, 2013 See Following Page 108 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Agency Funds Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities Year Ended April 30, 2013 Ending Additions Deductions Balances ASSETS Cash and Investments $398,222 3,216,406 3,218,794 395,834 Accounts Receivable 555,453 3,026,932 3,026,136 556,249 Total Assets 953,675 6,243,338 6,244,930 952,083 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable 1,857 - 1,857 - Other Liabilities 951,818 8,201,475 8,201,210 952,083 Total Liabilities 953,675 8,201,475 8,203,067 952,083 Developer Deposit Cash and Investments 147,669 32,947 48,631 131,985 LIABILITIES Accounts Payable 1,857 - 1,857 - Other Liabilities 145,812 33,184 47,011 131,985 Total Liabilities 147,669 33,184 48,868 131,985 ASSETS Beginning Balances All Funds 109 Ending Additions Deductions Balances Escrow Deposit Cash and Investments $250,553 3,183,459 3,170,163 263,849 Accounts Receivable 555,453 3,026,932 3,026,136 556,249 Total Assets 806,006 6,210,391 6,196,299 820,098 LIABILITIES Other Liabilities 806,006 8,168,291 8,154,199 820,098 Beginning Balances ASSETS SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULES 110 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements Betzwiser Development, LLC Adjustable Rate Note Payable of 2008 April 30, 2013 Date of Issue October 1, 2008 Date of Maturity October 1, 2028 Authorized Issue $937,500 Interest Rate Variable - 5yr T-Bill Rate Plus 3% Interest Dates Monthly Principal Maturity Dates Monthly Payable at Betzwiser Development, LLC Fiscal Year Interest Totals 2014 $32,012 50,283 82,295 2015 34,074 48,221 82,295 2016 36,270 46,025 82,295 2017 38,607 43,689 82,296 2018 41,094 41,201 82,295 2019 43,741 38,554 82,295 2020 46,560 35,735 82,295 2021 49,559 32,736 82,295 2022 52,752 29,543 82,295 2023 56,151 26,144 82,295 2024 59,769 22,526 82,295 2025 63,619 18,676 82,295 2026 67,718 14,577 82,295 2027 72,081 10,214 82,295 2028 76,725 5,570 82,295 2029 47,019 986 48,005 817,751 464,680 1,282,431 Requirements Principal CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS 111 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements IEPA (L17-115300) Loan Payable of 2000 April 30, 2013 Date of Issue March 6, 2000 Date of Maturity September 6, 2019 Authorized Issue $1,656,809 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rate 2.625% Interest Dates September 6 and March 6 Principal Maturity Dates September 6 and March 6 Payable at Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Fiscal Year Interest Totals Sept. 6 Amount Mar. 6 Amount 2014 $90,952 16,099 107,051 2013 8,346 2014 7,753 2015 93,355 13,696 107,051 2014 7,152 2015 6,544 2016 95,821 11,229 107,050 2015 5,927 2016 5,302 2017 98,353 8,697 107,050 2016 4,669 2017 4,028 2018 100,952 6,098 107,050 2017 3,378 2018 2,720 2019 103,619 3,431 107,050 2018 2,053 2019 1,378 2020 52,832 693 53,525 2019 693 2020 - 635,884 59,943 695,827 32,218 27,725 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 112 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements IEPA (L17-1156300) Loan Payable of 2007 April 30, 2013 Date of Issue August 9, 2007 Date of Maturity August 9, 2026 Authorized Issue $1,889,244 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rate 2.50% Interest Dates August 9 and February 9 Principal Maturity Dates August 9 and February 9 Payable at Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Fiscal Year Interest Totals Aug. 9 Amount Feb. 9 Amount 2014 $89,961 35,069 125,030 2013 17,814 2014 17,255 2015 92,225 32,805 125,030 2014 16,689 2015 16,116 2016 94,544 30,485 125,029 2015 15,536 2016 14,949 2017 96,922 28,108 125,030 2016 14,355 2017 13,753 2018 99,361 25,669 125,030 2017 13,143 2018 12,526 2019 101,861 23,170 125,031 2018 11,901 2019 11,269 2020 104,423 20,607 125,030 2019 10,628 2020 9,979 2021 107,049 17,981 125,030 2020 9,323 2021 8,658 2022 109,742 15,288 125,030 2021 7,985 2022 7,303 2023 112,503 12,527 125,030 2022 6,613 2023 5,914 2024 115,334 9,697 125,031 2023 5,207 2024 4,490 2025 118,235 6,795 125,030 2024 3,765 2025 3,030 2026 121,209 3,821 125,030 2025 2,287 2026 1,534 2027 61,744 772 62,516 2026 772 2027 - 1,425,113 262,794 1,687,907 136,018 126,776 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 113 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2004B April 30, 2013 Date of Issue March 1, 2004 Date of Maturity December 30, 2018 Authorized Issue $3,500,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 2.50% to 4.00% Interest Dates June 30 and December 30 Principal Maturity Dates December 30 Payable at BNY Midwest Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 30 Amount Dec. 30 Amount 2014 $280,000 88,750 368,750 2013 44,375 2013 44,375 2015 375,000 78,950 453,950 2014 39,475 2014 39,475 2016 395,000 65,826 460,826 2015 32,913 2015 32,913 2017 410,000 52,000 462,000 2016 26,000 2016 26,000 2018 435,000 35,600 470,600 2017 17,800 2017 17,800 2019 455,000 18,200 473,200 2018 9,100 2018 9,100 2,350,000 339,326 2,689,326 169,663 169,663 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 114 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005 April 30, 2013 Date of Issue March 15, 2005 Date of Maturity December 1, 2024 Authorized Issue $3,525,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 3.50% to 4.35% Interest Dates June 1 and December 1 Principal Maturity Date December 1 Payable at BNY Midwest Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 1 Amount Dec. 1 Amount 2014 $185,000 117,738 302,738 2013 58,869 2013 58,869 2015 195,000 110,522 305,522 2014 55,261 2014 55,261 2016 200,000 102,722 302,722 2015 51,361 2015 51,361 2017 210,000 94,722 304,722 2016 47,361 2016 47,361 2018 220,000 86,322 306,322 2017 43,161 2017 43,161 2019 225,000 77,522 302,522 2018 38,761 2018 38,761 2020 235,000 68,072 303,072 2019 34,036 2019 34,036 2021 245,000 58,202 303,202 2020 29,101 2020 29,101 2022 260,000 47,912 307,912 2021 23,956 2021 23,956 2023 275,000 36,992 311,992 2022 18,496 2022 18,496 2024 285,000 25,306 310,306 2023 12,653 2023 12,653 2025 300,000 13,050 313,050 2024 6,525 2024 6,525 2,835,000 839,082 3,674,082 419,541 419,541 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 115 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005A April 30, 2013 Date of Issue May 1, 2005 Date of Maturity December 30, 2022 Authorized Issue $3,825,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 4.00% to 4.375% Interest Dates June 30 and December 30 Principal Maturity Date December 30 Payable at BNY Midwest Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 30 Amount Dec. 30 Amount 2014 $215,000 113,180 328,180 2013 56,590 2013 56,590 2015 225,000 104,578 329,578 2014 52,289 2014 52,289 2016 235,000 95,578 330,578 2015 47,789 2015 47,789 2017 250,000 86,178 336,178 2016 43,089 2016 43,089 2018 260,000 76,178 336,178 2017 38,089 2017 38,089 2019 275,000 65,518 340,518 2018 32,759 2018 32,759 2020 290,000 54,106 344,106 2019 27,053 2019 27,053 2021 300,000 41,782 341,782 2020 20,891 2020 20,891 2022 320,000 28,656 348,656 2021 14,328 2021 14,328 2023 335,000 14,656 349,656 2022 7,328 2022 7,328 2,705,000 680,410 3,385,410 340,205 340,205 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 116 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements General Obligation Library Bonds of 2005B April 30, 2013 Date of Issue August 1, 2005 Date of Maturity December 30, 2024 Authorized Issue $7,250,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 4.00% to 4.75% Interest Dates June 30 and December 30 Principal Maturity Date December 30 Payable at BNY Midwest Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 30 Amount Dec. 30 Amount 2014 $335,000 297,526 632,526 2013 148,763 2013 148,763 2015 400,000 284,126 684,126 2014 142,063 2014 142,063 2016 435,000 268,126 703,126 2015 134,063 2015 134,063 2017 460,000 250,726 710,726 2016 125,363 2016 125,363 2018 485,000 232,326 717,326 2017 116,163 2017 116,163 2019 540,000 212,926 752,926 2018 106,463 2018 106,463 2020 575,000 187,950 762,950 2019 93,975 2019 93,975 2021 605,000 161,356 766,356 2020 80,678 2020 80,678 2022 650,000 133,376 783,376 2021 66,688 2021 66,688 2023 690,000 103,312 793,312 2022 51,656 2022 51,656 2024 725,000 70,538 795,538 2023 35,269 2023 35,269 2025 760,000 36,100 796,100 2024 18,050 2024 18,050 6,660,000 2,238,388 8,898,388 1,119,194 1,119,194 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 117 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements General Obligation Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2005C April 30, 2013 Date of Issue September 1, 2005 Date of Maturity December 30, 2024 Authorized Issue $2,000,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 3.50% to 5.50% Interest Dates June 30 and December 30 Principal Maturity Date December 30 Payable at BNY Midwest Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 30 Amount Dec. 30 Amount 2014 $95,000 70,976 165,976 2013 35,488 2013 35,488 2015 100,000 67,176 167,176 2014 33,588 2014 33,588 2016 105,000 63,176 168,176 2015 31,588 2015 31,588 2017 110,000 58,976 168,976 2016 29,488 2016 29,488 2018 110,000 54,576 164,576 2017 27,288 2017 27,288 2019 120,000 50,176 170,176 2018 25,088 2018 25,088 2020 120,000 45,376 165,376 2019 22,688 2019 22,688 2021 130,000 38,776 168,776 2020 19,388 2020 19,388 2022 135,000 31,626 166,626 2021 15,813 2021 15,813 2023 140,000 24,200 164,200 2022 12,100 2022 12,100 2024 150,000 16,500 166,500 2023 8,250 2023 8,250 2025 150,000 8,250 158,250 2024 4,125 2024 4,125 1,465,000 529,784 1,994,784 264,892 264,892 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 118 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements General Obligation Library Bonds of 2006 April 30, 2013 Date of Issue August 1, 2006 Date of Maturity December 30, 2024 Authorized Issue $1,500,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 4.75% to 4.80% Interest Dates June 30 and December 30 Principal Maturity Date December 30 Payable at BNY Midwest Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 30 Amount Dec. 30 Amount 2014 $100,000 39,238 139,238 2013 19,619 2013 19,619 2015 50,000 34,488 84,488 2014 17,244 2014 17,244 2016 50,000 32,112 82,112 2015 16,056 2015 16,056 2017 50,000 29,738 79,738 2016 14,869 2016 14,869 2018 50,000 27,362 77,362 2017 13,681 2017 13,681 2019 50,000 24,988 74,988 2018 12,494 2018 12,494 2020 50,000 22,612 72,612 2019 11,306 2019 11,306 2021 75,000 20,238 95,238 2020 10,119 2020 10,119 2022 75,000 16,676 91,676 2021 8,338 2021 8,338 2023 75,000 13,112 88,112 2022 6,556 2022 6,556 2024 100,000 9,550 109,550 2023 4,775 2023 4,775 2025 100,000 4,800 104,800 2024 2,400 2024 2,400 825,000 274,914 1,099,914 137,457 137,457 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 119 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements General Obligation Refunding Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2007A April 30, 2013 Date of Issue January 23, 2007 Date of Maturity December 30, 2022 Authorized Issue $3,020,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 4.00% to 4.25% Interest Dates June 30 and December 30 Principal Maturity Date December 30 Payable at The Bank of New York Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 30 Amount Dec. 30 Amount 2014 $15,000 123,042 138,042 2013 61,521 2013 61,521 2015 15,000 122,422 137,422 2014 61,211 2014 61,211 2016 15,000 121,792 136,792 2015 60,896 2015 60,896 2017 15,000 121,162 136,162 2016 60,581 2016 60,581 2018 15,000 120,526 135,526 2017 60,263 2017 60,263 2019 15,000 119,888 134,888 2018 59,944 2018 59,944 2020 680,000 119,250 799,250 2019 59,625 2019 59,625 2021 695,000 90,350 785,350 2020 45,175 2020 45,175 2022 725,000 60,812 785,812 2021 30,406 2021 30,406 2023 750,000 30,000 780,000 2022 15,000 2022 15,000 2,940,000 1,029,244 3,969,244 514,622 514,622 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 120 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements General Obligation Refunding Alternate Revenue Source Bonds of 2011 April 30, 2013 Date of Issue November 10, 2011 Date of Maturity December 30, 2025 Authorized Issue $11,150,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rate 4.28% Interest Dates June 30 and December 30 Principal Maturity Date December 30 Payable at The Bank of New York Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 30 Amount Dec. 30 Amount 2014 $660,000 477,220 1,137,220 2013 238,610 2013 238,610 2015 685,000 448,972 1,133,972 2014 224,486 2014 224,486 2016 715,000 419,654 1,134,654 2015 209,827 2015 209,827 2017 745,000 389,052 1,134,052 2016 194,526 2016 194,526 2018 780,000 357,166 1,137,166 2017 178,583 2017 178,583 2019 810,000 323,782 1,133,782 2018 161,891 2018 161,891 2020 845,000 289,114 1,134,114 2019 144,557 2019 144,557 2021 885,000 252,948 1,137,948 2020 126,474 2020 126,474 2022 920,000 215,070 1,135,070 2021 107,535 2021 107,535 2023 960,000 175,694 1,135,694 2022 87,847 2022 87,847 2024 1,000,000 134,606 1,134,606 2023 67,303 2023 67,303 2025 1,045,000 91,806 1,136,806 2024 45,903 2024 45,903 2026 1,100,000 47,080 1,147,080 2025 23,540 2025 23,540 11,150,000 3,622,164 14,772,164 1,811,082 1,811,082 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 121 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements Illinois Rural Bond Bank Debt Certificates of 2003 April 30, 2013 Date of Issue September 1, 2003 Date of Maturity February 1, 2023 Authorized Issue $2,035,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 1.60% to 5.20% Interest Dates August 1 and February 1 Principal Maturity Date February 1 Payable at US National Bank Assoc. Fiscal Year Interest Totals Aug. 1 Amount Feb. 1 Amount 2014 $100,000 62,048 162,048 2013 31,024 2014 31,024 2015 105,000 57,648 162,648 2014 28,824 2015 28,824 2016 110,000 52,870 162,870 2015 26,435 2016 26,435 2017 115,000 47,756 162,756 2016 23,878 2017 23,878 2018 120,000 42,292 162,292 2017 21,146 2018 21,146 2019 130,000 36,232 166,232 2018 18,116 2019 18,116 2020 135,000 29,668 164,668 2019 14,834 2020 14,834 2021 140,000 22,850 162,850 2020 11,425 2021 11,425 2022 150,000 15,710 165,710 2021 7,855 2022 7,855 2023 155,000 8,060 163,060 2022 4,030 2023 4,030 1,260,000 375,134 1,635,134 187,567 187,567 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 122 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements Debt Certificates of 2003 April 30, 2013 Date of Issue June 15, 2003 Date of Maturity December 15, 2018 Authorized Issue $4,800,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 3.80% to 5.00% Interest Dates June 15 and December 15 Principal Maturity Date December 15 Payable at BNY Midwest Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 15 Amount Dec. 15 Amount 2014 $100,000 33,150 133,150 2013 16,575 2013 16,575 2015 100,000 29,350 129,350 2014 14,675 2014 14,675 2016 100,000 25,450 125,450 2015 12,725 2015 12,725 2017 100,000 21,450 121,450 2016 10,725 2016 10,725 2018 100,000 17,300 117,300 2017 8,650 2017 8,650 2019 300,000 13,050 313,050 2018 6,525 2018 6,525 800,000 139,750 939,750 69,875 69,875 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 123 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements Debt Certificates of 2004A April 30, 2013 Date of Issue March 1, 2004 Date of Maturity December 30, 2014 Authorized Issue $1,600,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 1.40% to 3.60% Interest Dates June 30 and December 30 Principal Maturity Date December 30 Payable at BNY Midwest Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 30 Amount Dec. 30 Amount 2014 $180,000 13,050 193,050 2013 6,525 2013 6,525 2015 190,000 6,840 196,840 2014 3,420 2014 3,420 370,000 19,890 389,890 9,945 9,945 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal 124 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Long-Term Debt Requirements Refunding Debt Certificates of 2006A April 30, 2013 Date of Issue December 19, 2006 Date of Maturity December 30, 2022 Authorized Issue $5,555,000 Denomination of Bonds $5,000 Interest Rates 4.00% to 4.20% Interest Dates June 30 and December 30 Principal Maturity Date December 30 Payable at The Bank of New York Trust Company Fiscal Year Interest Totals Jun. 30 Amount Dec. 30 Amount 2014 $405,000 205,606 610,606 2013 102,803 2013 102,803 2015 420,000 189,406 609,406 2014 94,703 2014 94,703 2016 435,000 172,606 607,606 2015 86,303 2015 86,303 2017 460,000 155,206 615,206 2016 77,603 2016 77,603 2018 475,000 136,806 611,806 2017 68,403 2017 68,403 2019 495,000 117,806 612,806 2018 58,903 2018 58,903 2020 850,000 98,006 948,006 2019 49,003 2019 49,003 2021 850,000 62,306 912,306 2020 31,153 2020 31,153 2022 390,000 26,606 416,606 2021 13,303 2021 13,303 2023 255,000 10,520 265,520 2022 5,260 2022 5,260 5,035,000 1,174,874 6,209,874 587,437 587,437 CURRENT AND LONG-TERM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST REQUIREMENTS Requirements Interest Due on Principal STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited) This part of the comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the City’s overall financial health. Financial Trends These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City’s financial performance and well-being have changed over time. Revenue Capacity These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the City’s most significant local revenue sources. Debt Capacity These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City’s current levels of outstanding debt and the City’s ability to issue additional debt in the future. Demographic and Economic Information These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City’s financial activities take place. Operating Information These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the City’s financial report relates to the services the City provides and the activities it performs. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Net Position by Component - Last Nine Fiscal Years* April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) See Following Page 125 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Net Position by Component - Last Nine Fiscal Years* 2006 2007 Governmental Activities Net Investment in Capital Assets $47,690,975 48,066,205 51,904,378 Restricted 4,487,837 11,373,193 6,819,743 Unrestricted (1,038,834) (6,407,838) (4,161,179) Total Governmental Activities Net Position 51,139,978 53,031,560 54,562,942 Business-Type Activities Net Investment in Capital Assets 12,512,021 15,492,504 14,990,516 Restricted 3,155,589 3,314,989 5,387,523 Unrestricted (3,145,190) (825,405) (623,092) Total Business-Type Activities Net Position 12,522,420 17,982,088 19,754,947 Primary Government Net Investment in Capital Assets 60,202,996 63,558,709 66,894,894 Restricted 7,643,426 14,688,182 12,207,266 Unrestricted (4,184,024) (7,233,243) (4,784,271) Total Primary Government Net Position 63,662,398 71,013,648 74,317,889 * Accrual Basis of Accounting Note: The City adopted GASB Statement 34 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005. April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) 2005 126 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 53,202,922 51,529,648 60,971,543 61,594,404 58,943,771 62,000,588 3,630,544 3,107,371 3,468,150 3,315,028 3,478,139 3,537,867 (658,755) (2,038,061) (4,124,885) (3,827,879) 93,682 3,341,127 56,174,711 52,598,958 60,314,808 61,081,553 62,515,592 68,879,582 15,924,390 18,676,309 32,942,926 33,166,989 26,640,987 31,719,100 4,898,626 - 215,000 285,000 683,147 - 175,008 3,212,121 2,904,916 2,608,587 13,406,883 13,502,177 20,998,024 21,888,430 36,062,842 36,060,576 40,731,017 45,221,277 69,127,312 70,205,957 93,914,469 94,761,393 85,584,758 93,719,688 8,529,170 3,107,371 3,683,150 3,600,028 4,161,286 3,537,867 (483,747) 1,174,060 (1,219,969) (1,219,292) 13,500,565 16,843,304 77,172,735 74,487,388 96,377,650 97,142,129 103,246,609 114,100,859 127 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Changes in Net Position - Last Nine Fiscal Years* 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Expenses Governmental Activities General Government $2,290,696 4,706,185 4,871,741 5,688,953 5,513,569 4,367,204 4,757,527 5,731,692 3,121,857 Public Safety 2,173,457 2,357,913 2,761,019 3,233,955 3,099,998 3,665,295 3,287,448 2,905,184 3,750,318 Community Development 702 7,045 502,434 553,220 502,929 447,491 394,687 307,053 356,689 Public Works 3,633,163 3,585,374 4,139,483 3,511,697 3,024,306 3,082,318 3,420,923 2,861,052 2,983,200 Library 404,863 485,566 757,256 955,385 1,044,318 1,103,649 1,170,275 871,050 932,748 Parks and Recreation 1,527,803 2,036,521 2,112,376 2,157,818 2,155,995 2,217,232 1,645,468 1,862,044 1,812,483 Unallocated Bad Debt Adjustment - - - - - 1,016,132 - - - Interest on Long-Term Debt 193,838 656,664 958,673 723,618 741,303 757,192 723,246 704,213 691,551 Total Governmental Activities Expenses 10,224,522 13,835,268 16,102,982 16,824,646 16,082,418 16,656,513 15,399,574 15,242,288 13,648,846 Business-Type Activities Water 2,327,986 2,611,383 2,975,674 3,036,973 3,332,313 2,416,462 2,396,100 2,505,247 2,638,252 Sewer 6,425,836 1,200,778 1,242,655 1,177,924 1,322,270 1,569,785 1,628,159 1,653,025 1,630,023 Recreation Center - - - - 675,617 634,346 688,218 657,479 592,707 Total Business-Type Activities Expenses 8,753,822 3,812,161 4,218,329 4,214,897 5,330,200 4,620,593 4,712,477 4,815,751 4,860,982 Total Primary Government Expenses 18,978,344 17,647,429 20,321,311 21,039,543 21,412,618 21,277,106 20,112,051 20,058,039 18,509,828 Program Revenues Governmental Activities Charges for Services General Government 995,121 1,442,176 1,808,797 1,775,663 1,723,173 1,795,244 1,840,958 2,057,279 1,751,309 Public Safety 68,978 76,534 - - - - - - - Public Works 188,000 208,455 - - 29,018 - - - - Library 17,121 17,507 19,616 27,045 427,842 61,096 48,983 50,582 58,794 Parks and Recreation 521,267 534,018 578,148 376,857 - 388,913 342,311 265,698 265,614 Operating Grants/Contributions 324,958 360,026 41,925 778,342 19,664 629,822 830,767 633,091 696,058 Capital Grants/Contributions 7,501,077 1,296,050 3,940,737 1,909,670 922,409 10,650,597 1,596,067 1,409,412 3,317,256 Total Governmental Activities Program Revenues 9,616,522 3,934,766 6,389,223 4,867,577 3,122,106 13,525,672 4,659,086 4,416,062 6,089,031 Business-Type Activities Charges for Services Water 1,892,465 3,118,433 3,097,565 1,920,029 1,742,057 1,875,826 2,543,796 2,592,652 2,823,357 Sewer 2,067,065 3,055,326 3,477,706 855,334 789,781 1,991,015 1,476,558 1,366,022 1,358,420 Recreation - - - - 497,992 582,889 620,020 620,489 493,617 Operating Grants/Contributions - - - - - - - - - Capital Grants/Contributions 6,755,200 1,111,679 2,085,002 1,895,447 343,578 14,473,957 241,344 2,433,079 4,829,491 Total Business-Type Activities Program Revenues 10,714,730 7,285,438 8,660,273 4,670,810 3,373,408 18,923,687 4,881,718 7,012,242 9,504,885 Total Primary Government Program Revenues 20,331,252 11,220,204 15,049,496 9,538,387 6,495,514 32,449,359 9,540,804 11,428,304 15,593,916 April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) 2005 128 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20132005 Net (Expense) Revenue Governmental Activities $(608,000) (9,900,502) (9,713,759) (11,957,069) (12,960,312) (3,130,841) (10,740,488) (10,826,226) (7,559,815) Business-Type Activities 1,960,908 3,473,277 4,441,944 455,913 (1,956,792) 14,303,094 169,241 2,196,491 4,643,903 Total Primary Government Net (Expense) Revenue 1,352,908 (6,427,225) (5,271,815) (11,501,156) (14,917,104) 11,172,253 (10,571,247) (8,629,735) (2,915,912) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position Governmental Activities Taxes Property 1,711,861 2,258,419 1,950,798 3,644,499 3,670,632 4,087,698 4,281,902 4,953,862 4,743,599 Sales 2,285,995 2,586,288 2,647,678 2,507,664 2,474,549 2,480,213 2,577,651 2,962,810 4,409,926 Income 612,425 679,842 1,040,678 1,053,292 1,124,204 1,280,519 1,306,325 1,444,426 1,587,324 Utility 335,081 403,657 1,288,406 1,612,834 1,630,188 1,542,649 1,614,294 1,568,699 1,553,693 Other 848,331 956,982 480,941 534,601 861,936 641,360 780,863 963,524 922,439 Development Fees 2,640,061 3,296,849 2,646,071 2,447,936 454,822 - - - - Interest 58,700 446,871 448,746 320,046 74,761 73,327 6,762 10,388 16,368 Miscellaneous 144,185 309,163 210,040 1,076,159 1,336,958 783,999 764,528 667,637 690,456 Transfers 740,498 405,419 2,754,737 540,525 (2,243,491) 134,209 174,908 - - Total Governmental Activities 9,377,137 11,343,490 13,468,095 13,737,556 9,384,559 11,023,974 11,507,233 12,571,346 13,923,805 Business-Type Activities Property Taxes - - - - - - - 1,883,730 1,883,730 Interest 172,084 365,278 352,654 230,212 52,314 5,527 3,401 2,687 9,542 Connection Fees - - - 1,670,495 549,578 - - - - Miscellaneous - - 153,744 124,400 1,815 - - 60,691 (1,624,872) Transfers (740,498) (405,419) (2,754,737) (540,525) 2,243,491 (134,209) (174,908) - - Total Business-Type Activities (568,414) (40,141) (2,248,339) 1,484,582 2,847,198 (128,682) (171,507) 1,947,108 268,400 Total Primary Government 8,808,723 11,303,349 11,219,756 15,222,138 12,231,757 10,895,292 11,335,726 14,518,454 14,192,205 Changes in Net Position Governmental Activities 8,769,137 1,442,988 3,754,336 1,780,487 (3,575,753) 7,893,133 766,745 1,745,120 6,363,990 Business-Type Activities 1,392,494 3,433,136 2,193,605 1,940,495 890,406 14,174,412 (2,266) 4,143,599 4,912,303 Total Primary Government 10,161,631 4,876,124 5,947,941 3,720,982 (2,685,347) 22,067,545 764,479 5,888,719 11,276,293 * Accrual Basis of Accounting Note: The City adopted GASB Statement 34 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2005. 129 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years* 2005 2006 General Fund Reserved $75,387 675,711 2,862,016 Unreserved 1,367,915 1,466,917 2,947,136 Nonspendable - - - Assigned - - - Unassigned - - - Total General Fund 1,443,302 2,142,628 5,809,152 All Other Governmental Funds Reserved 13,124,008 4,434,238 9,029,130 Unreserved, Reported in, Special Revenue Funds 1,105,776 934,163 1,492,566 Debt Service Funds 15,540 13,918 (9,494) Capital Projects Funds (380,747) (250,268) (208,136) Nonspendable - - - Restricted - - - Committed - - - Assigned - - - Unassigned - - - Total All Other Governmental Funds 13,864,577 5,132,051 10,304,066 * Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting Note: The City adopted GASB Statement 54 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012. April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) 2004 130 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2,476,718 287,036 164,587 39,497 136,917 - - 2,841,106 2,665,300 1,230,953 (532,436) (408,817) - - - - - - - 153,770 139,985 - - - - - 332,500 - - - - - - 784,353 4,083,835 5,317,824 2,952,336 1,395,540 (492,939) (271,900) 1,270,623 4,223,820 4,460,492 3,630,544 3,505,069 3,482,941 3,323,515 - - 444,906 1,128,049 642,298 403,793 828,903 - - (100,567) (237,259) - - - - - (276,107) (514,524) (560,274) (626,102) (586,372) - - - - - - - 27,913 34,586 - - - - - 3,565,649 3,549,913 - - - - - 264,616 305,804 - - - - - 428,933 504,314 - - - - - (874,152) (571,615) 4,528,724 4,006,810 3,587,093 3,260,632 3,566,046 3,412,959 3,823,002 131 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds - Last Ten Fiscal Years* 2005 2006 2007 Revenues Taxes $4,418,699 5,101,695 6,165,165 6,100,171 Intergovernmental 921,793 1,078,383 1,178,918 1,610,978 Licenses, Permits and Fees 7,198,174 4,305,072 5,449,815 4,958,458 Charges for Services 237,580 - - - Fines and Forfeitures 74,045 72,613 80,534 94,174 Interest 79,608 54,812 446,871 448,746 Miscellaneous 388,343 192,538 298,499 438,340 Total Revenues 13,318,242 10,805,113 13,619,802 13,650,867 Expenditures General Government 3,909,449 3,303,080 4,488,151 5,000,288 Public Safety 1,754,666 1,960,107 2,165,111 2,589,749 Community Development - 64,198 7,870 303 Public Works 6,126,981 3,247,086 3,715,663 2,602,247 Library - 395,944 2,929,556 560,248 Parks and Recreation 1,120,823 1,439,335 2,101,502 1,923,584 Capital Outlay 798,183 712,060 535,107 7,943,295 Debt Service Cost of Issuance - - - 14,150 Principal Retirement 643,337 285,701 281,434 205,000 Interest and Fiscal Charges 190,475 154,865 235,875 958,673 Total Expenditures 14,543,914 11,562,376 16,460,269 21,797,537 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,225,672) (757,263) (2,840,467) (8,146,670) Other Financing Sources (Uses) Disposal of Capital Assets 140,410 4,510 34,114 - Adjustment for Bad Debts - - - - Debt Issuance 11,981,000 4,175,000 11,075,000 1,500,000 Accrued Interest on Sale of Bonds 9,732 3,888 28,667 - Bond Premium/(Discount)80,400 (21,679) 93,341 - Payment to Escrow Agent - - - (925,000) Transfers In 2,341,022 3,006,973 2,337,829 3,602,435 Transfers Out (3,458,630) (2,266,475) (1,932,410) (2,297,435) 11,093,934 4,902,217 11,636,541 1,880,000 Net Change in Fund Balances 9,868,262 4,144,954 8,796,074 (6,266,670) Debt Service as a Percentage of Noncapital Expenditures 6.500%4.200%3.400%8.020% * Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) 2004 132 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 7,966,070 8,350,100 8,694,985 9,254,138 10,020,005 6,767,061 2,164,579 1,350,083 1,910,171 2,479,758 2,906,407 7,545,978 4,508,936 2,476,691 894,871 486,264 336,683 400,718 - - 1,252,904 1,519,004 1,842,620 1,479,712 118,565 139,875 166,078 228,009 194,256 195,287 320,046 74,761 73,327 6,762 10,388 16,368 989,443 1,344,427 676,539 763,503 667,637 690,456 16,067,639 13,735,937 13,668,875 14,737,438 15,977,996 17,095,580 5,652,456 5,065,127 4,590,261 4,724,320 5,501,632 3,498,104 3,015,178 3,160,730 3,260,256 2,886,313 2,849,067 3,568,665 553,220 502,929 423,835 395,291 307,053 365,188 4,473,822 1,752,822 1,976,664 2,038,458 1,926,169 1,841,795 797,388 828,294 915,195 975,587 691,525 752,373 2,231,553 2,035,413 1,532,422 1,360,244 1,488,018 1,450,824 1,654,695 2,199,602 242,005 376,030 101,133 572,022 - - - - - - 345,000 559,940 849,937 896,544 1,038,254 1,025,074 768,817 749,703 764,364 733,106 701,809 663,495 19,492,129 16,854,560 14,554,939 14,385,893 14,604,660 13,737,540 (3,424,490) (3,118,623) (886,064) 351,545 1,373,336 3,358,040 86,716 9,081 - - 16,100 5,200 - - (1,016,132) - - - - 937,500 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,803,008 2,924,616 2,046,452 1,848,135 1,047,727 1,504,002 (2,262,483) (2,729,087) (1,912,243) (1,673,227) (1,047,727) (1,504,002) 627,241 1,142,110 (881,923) 174,908 16,100 5,200 (2,797,249) (1,976,513) (1,767,987) 526,453 1,389,436 3,363,240 7.104%9.021%11.227%11.709%13.098%17.159% 133 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Assessed Value and Actual Value of Taxable Property - Last Ten Fiscal Years April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Tax Fiscal Levy Year Year 2004 2003 $147,660,675 $1,128,633 2005 2004 176,051,368 961,557 2006 2005 228,416,554 1,672,887 2007 2006 316,602,897 2,384,569 2008 2007 399,859,224 2,643,309 2009 2008 440,037,839 2,562,106 2010 2009 444,422,818 2,524,355 2011 2010 407,528,709 2,398,027 2012 2011 367,600,683 2,450,231 2013 2012 332,551,186 2,568,351 Data Source: Office of the County Clerk Note: Property is assess at 33% of actual value. Residential Property Farm 134 Total Direct Tax Rate $46,944,380 $5,569,563 $18,084 $201,321,335 0.640 55,516,668 5,809,502 17,382 238,356,477 0.583 68,704,340 6,781,706 17,425 305,592,912 0.514 71,761,771 8,068,081 17,328 398,834,646 0.455 98,576,640 8,541,508 17,328 509,638,009 0.416 117,707,447 6,914,772 17,328 567,239,492 0.427 124,381,958 6,921,977 17,328 578,268,436 0.437 122,304,406 6,820,310 17,328 539,068,780 0.902 112,753,206 7,283,729 17,328 490,105,177 0.705 101,264,981 6,720,962 17,328 443,122,808 0.749 Total Taxable AssessedRailroadIndustrialCommercial Property Property ValueProperty 135 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Principal Property Taxpayers - Current Tax Levy Year and Nine Tax Levy Years Ago April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Percentage Percentage of Total City of Total City Taxable Taxable Assessed Assessed Taxpayer Rank Value Rank Value Menard, Inc $7,804,600 1 1.76% Copley Ventures, Inc.7,338,864 2 1.66% Cannonball LLC 4,596,172 3 1.04% Yorkville Shopping Center 3,884,596 4 0.88% Target Corporation 3,104,272 5 0.70% Wrigley Manufacturing Co., LLC 2,893,422 6 0.65%$4,721,900 1 2.35% Boombah Properties LLC 2,269,648 7 0.51% Home Depot USA Inc.1,832,215 8 0.41% Prime Yorkville LLC 1,803,983 9 0.41% York Meadows LLC 1,686,666 10 0.38%2,177,520 3 1.08% First National Bank of DeKalb Trust 3,288,136 2 1.63% American National Bank & Trust of Chicago 1,365,698 4 0.68% Bank of Ravenswood 1,046,700 5 0.52% Yorkville National Bank 824,375 6 0.41% Walker Customer Homes, Inc 672,747 7 0.33% Castle Bank Yorkville 650,277 8 0.32% Landmark Center LLP 592,851 9 0.29% CA Yorkville LLC 421,084 10 0.21% 37,214,438 8.40%15,761,288 7.83% Data Source: Office of the County Clerk Assessed Assessed Value Value 2012 Tax Levy 2003 Tax Levy Taxable Taxable UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates - Last Ten Levy Years April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) See Following Page 136 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates - Last Ten Tax Levy Years April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) 2003 2004 2005 City Direct Rates Corporate 0.1012 0.0239 0.0120 Bonds and Interest - - - IMRF 0.0612 0.0796 0.0617 Police Protection 0.0750 0.0750 0.0750 Police Pension 0.1028 0.0973 0.0819 Garbage 0.1228 0.1332 0.1220 Audit 0.0098 0.0062 0.0077 Liability Insurance 0.0562 0.0525 0.0390 Social Security 0.1000 0.1069 0.1048 School Crossing Guard 0.0047 0.0042 0.0062 Unemployment Insurance 0.0058 0.0038 0.0033 Total Direct Rates 0.6395 0.5826 0.5136 Overlapping Rates Kendall County 0.6481 0.6194 0.6156 Kendall County Forest Preserve 0.0403 0.0369 0.0335 Bristol Township 0.3886 0.3800 0.3500 Bristol - Kendall Fire District 0.4011 0.5940 0.5468 Yorkville - Bristol Sanitary District 0.0547 0.0486 0.0385 Yorkville Community Unit School District #115 4.2383 4.0829 4.3156 Waubonsee Community College District #516 0.4105 0.4104 0.3968 Yorkville Public Library 0.1500 0.1500 0.1500 Total Direct and Overlapping Rates 6.9711 6.9048 6.9604 Data Source: Office of the County Clerk Notes: (1) Rates are per $100 of Assessed Value. (2) Representative tax rates for other government units are from Bristol Township 137 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 0.0142 0.0564 0.1329 0.1138 0.1472 0.2108 0.2354 - - - - 0.4105 0.1477 0.1097 0.0725 0.0968 0.0724 0.0778 0.0804 0.0918 0.1016 0.0788 0.0699 0.0550 0.0584 0.0620 0.0714 0.0790 0.0690 0.0589 0.0573 0.0583 0.0670 0.0900 0.1229 0.0524 - - - - - - 0.0081 0.0070 0.0073 0.0095 0.0098 0.0082 0.0068 0.0404 0.0391 0.0387 0.0583 0.0615 0.0082 0.0090 0.1084 0.0771 0.0541 0.0528 0.0546 0.0612 0.0677 0.0065 0.0047 0.0043 0.0042 0.0044 0.0051 0.0056 0.0044 0.0065 0.0047 0.0043 0.0045 0.0102 0.0113 0.4547 0.4164 0.4267 0.4374 0.9019 0.7046 0.7490 0.5925 0.5595 0.5724 0.5734 0.6396 0.6999 0.7446 0.0299 0.1292 0.0966 0.0944 0.1041 0.1205 0.1495 0.3122 0.2906 0.2921 0.2963 0.3246 0.3693 0.3934 0.5484 0.5738 0.5896 0.6007 0.6734 0.7176 0.7356 0.0339 0.0291 - - - - - 4.4474 4.4474 4.5923 4.6973 5.2767 5.9101 6.7561 0.4005 0.3924 0.3990 0.4037 0.4115 0.4702 0.5306 0.3697 0.2210 0.2099 0.2172 0.2589 0.3042 0.3242 7.1892 7.0594 7.1786 7.3204 8.5907 9.2964 10.3830 138 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Tax Fiscal Levy Percentage Percentage Year Year of Levy of Levy 2005 2003 $1,287,453 $1,283,911 99.72%- $1,283,911 99.72% 2006 2004 1,388,667 1,387,085 99.89%- 1,387,085 99.89% 2007 2005 1,569,528 1,566,118 99.78%- 1,566,118 99.78% 2008 2006 1,813,501 1,813,308 99.99%- 1,813,308 99.99% 2009 2007 2,122,133 2,101,984 99.05%- 2,101,984 99.05% 2010 2008 2,420,411 2,407,483 99.47%- 2,407,483 99.47% 2011 2009 2,529,057 2,521,570 99.70%- 2,521,570 99.70% 2012 2010*4,862,185 4,849,681 99.74%- 4,849,681 99.74% 2013 2011*3,452,742 3,435,616 99.50%- 3,435,616 99.50% 2014 2012*3,318,990 - - - - - Data Source: Office of the County Treasurer * The 2010, 2011, and 2012 tax levy extended amount includes bonds and interest in the amount of $2,212,770, $723,689 and $486,150, respectively, that were previously abated. ** Includes property taxes collected in the current year that may be attributable to prior years. These collections, if any, are immaterial as 99% or greater of the current year's tax levy has historically been collected during the respective fiscal year. Additionally, information to associate any non-current tax collections to a specific tax levy is not readily available. Note: Property in the City is reassessed each year. Property is assess at 33% of actual value. Taxes Collected within the Collections Levied for Fiscal Year of the Levy in Total Collections to Date ** Subsequent Year Amount Years Amount the Fiscal UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Estimate of Taxable Sales by Category - Last Ten Calendar Years April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) See Following Page 139 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Estimate of Taxable Sales by Category - Last Ten Calendar Years April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) 2004 2005 General Merchandise*$- - - Food 306,587 358,048 353,518 Drinking and Eating Places 122,500 148,652 171,582 Apparel*- - - Furniture & H.H. & Radio 31,809 38,194 44,865 Lumber, Building Hardware 893,191 1,131,354 1,288,827 Automobile and Filling Stations 107,890 78,129 82,376 Drugs and Miscellaneous Retail 171,648 188,871 219,702 Agriculture and All Others 128,800 158,624 199,207 Manufacturers 40,198 56,306 109,375 Total 1,812,913 2,169,045 2,479,311 City Direct Sales Tax Rate 1.00%1.00%1.00% Data Source: Illinois Department of Revenue - Local Tax Allocation Division Data available for calendar year only. * Data by category is not available from the State of Illinois for categories with less than four taxpayers. However, they are included in the totals. Per the State of Illinois, there must not have been four taxpayers during the year 2003 through 2006. 2003 140 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 - 51,257 276,566 449,732 508,825 555,129 571,210 376,442 390,544 326,495 276,477 258,675 262,556 259,509 203,071 214,845 230,623 236,676 248,772 268,418 279,649 - 4,228 19,792 52,413 58,032 68,320 85,797 44,882 43,654 26,443 15,300 21,282 - 7,727 556,171 854,375 715,491 347,804 359,245 352,669 362,987 109,129 109,474 143,432 164,330 187,309 194,135 178,282 969,694 522,118 347,137 372,802 562,570 603,718 582,001 274,340 284,907 250,300 175,964 53,410 58,065 64,558 124,549 111,043 167,006 302,537 323,334 191,287 78,346 2,662,379 2,586,447 2,503,286 2,394,036 2,581,452 2,554,297 2,470,066 1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00%1.00% 141 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Direct and Overlapping Sales Tax Rates - Last Ten Fiscal Years April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Local City County Total Fiscal State Sales Tax Non-Home Rule County Public Safety Sales Tax Year Sales Tax to City Sales Tax*Sales Tax Property Rate 2004 5.00%1.00%0.00%0.25%0.50%6.75% 2005 5.00%1.00%0.00%0.25%0.50%6.75% 2006 5.00%1.00%0.00%0.25%0.50%6.75% 2007 5.00%1.00%0.00%0.25%0.50%6.75% 2008 5.00%1.00%0.00%0.25%1.00%7.25% 2009 5.00%1.00%0.00%0.25%1.00%7.25% 2010 5.00%1.00%0.00%0.25%1.00%7.25% 2011 5.00%1.00%0.00%0.25%1.00%7.25% 2012 5.00%1.00%1.00%0.25%1.00%8.25% 2013 5.00%1.00%1.00%0.25%1.00%8.25% Data Source: Illinois Department of Revenue *Non-Home Rule Sales Tax was implemented on January 1, 2012. The above tax rates are for General Merchandise. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) See Following Page 142 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Fiscal Year 2004 $575,000 $1,235,000 $1,756,872 $1,890 $3,500,000 2005 4,045,000 1,835,000 1,576,171 1,890 3,500,000 2006 15,065,000 1,735,000 1,449,737 1,890 16,680,000 2007 16,475,000 695,000 - 106,890 19,540,000 2008 16,255,000 570,000 450,000 106,890 19,300,000 2009 15,945,000 430,000 1,277,560 106,890 19,070,000 2010 15,365,000 285,000 1,152,623 1,890 18,855,000 2011 14,715,000 190,000 1,001,079 1,890 18,605,000 2012 13,925,000 95,000 847,825 1,890 18,175,000 2013 13,025,000 - 817,751 1,890 17,905,000 Note: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. (1) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics for personal income and population data. * IEPA Loan L17-013000 and L17-115300 were reported as Governmental Activities prior to Fiscal Year 2007. Revenue SourceDebt Obligation and Alternative General General Revenue Source Commitments Alternative Obligation and Payable * OtherLoans Governmental Activities Bonds Certificates Bonds 143 Percentage of Personal Income (1) $11,571,859 $- $- $18,640,621 5.45%$2,121 11,617,428 - - 22,575,489 6.30%2,569 11,534,594 - - 46,466,221 12.37%4,147 10,423,461 2,752,666 1,319,742 51,312,759 12.75%4,580 10,198,112 3,062,837 3,114,694 53,057,533 12.50%4,736 9,932,125 2,884,366 2,670,505 52,316,446 12.03%3,107 9,571,912 2,686,846 2,523,422 50,441,693 12.34%2,996 9,064,112 2,483,882 2,296,958 48,357,921 11.51%2,858 8,460,000 2,275,320 2,065,958 45,845,993 10.60%2,709 7,465,000 2,060,997 1,952,534 43,228,172 9.89%2,555 Total Loans Capita (1) Debt Primary GovernmentCertificatesCommitments Per IEPA Payable Business-Type Activities Other 144 April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Percentage of Total Taxable Assessed Fiscal Value of Year Property (1) 2004 $4,075,000 $- $4,075,000 2.02%$463.65 2005 7,545,000 - 7,545,000 3.17%858.46 2006 31,745,000 - 31,745,000 10.39%2,833.36 2007 36,015,000 - 36,015,000 9.03%3,214.48 2008 35,555,000 - 35,555,000 6.98%3,173.42 2009 35,015,000 - 35,015,000 6.17%2,079.52 2010 34,220,000 - 34,220,000 5.92%2,032.31 2011 33,320,000 578,443 32,741,557 6.07%1,934.97 2012 32,100,000 - 32,100,000 6.55%1,897.05 2013 30,930,000 - 30,930,000 6.98%1,827.91 Note: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. (1) See the Schedule of Assessed Value and Actual Value of Taxable Property for property value data. (2) See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics for personal income and population data. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding - Last Ten Fiscal Years General Obligation and Alternative Revenue Source Bonds Total Per Capita (2) Less: Amounts Debt Service Available in 145 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt (2) Percentage of (3) Debt (1)Applicable Governmental Unit to City * United City of Yorkville $13,844,641 100.000%$13,844,641 Overlapping Debt County of Kendall (4)39,573,762 16.590%6,565,287 Forest Preserve District of Kendall County 48,071,000 16.590%7,974,979 Yorkville Community Unit School District #115 81,945,267 58.300%47,774,091 Waubonsee Community College District #516 84,161,775 5.290%4,452,158 Plano Community Unit School District #88 27,605,809 0.370%102,141 Newark Community Consolidated School District #66 1,565,000 0.330%5,165 Total Overlapping Debt 282,922,613 66,873,821 Total Direct and Overlapping Debt 296,767,254 80,718,462 Data Source: Kendall County Tax Extension Department * Determined by ratio of assessed valuation of property subject to taxation in the City to valuation of property subject to taxation in overlapping unit. Notes: (1) As of May 8, 2013. (2) Percentages are based on 2012 EAV's, the latest available. (3) The United City of Yorkville has $91,463,000 in outstanding non-committal debt which is expected to be paid from sources other than City revenues. (4) Includes Public Building Commission. Share of Gross Debt Debt April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) City's 146 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Schedule of Legal Debt Margin - Last Ten Fiscal Years 2004 2005 2006 2007 Legal Debt Limit $17,363,965 20,558,246 26,357,389 34,399,488 Total Net Debt Applicable to Limit 12,806,859 13,452,428 20,519,594 19,868,461 Legal Debt Margin 4,557,106 7,105,818 5,837,795 14,531,027 Total Net Debt Applicable to the Limit as a Percentage of Debt Limit 73.76%65.44%77.85%57.76% April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) 147 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 43,956,278 48,924,406 49,875,653 46,494,682 42,271,572 38,219,342 19,518,112 19,037,125 18,356,912 17,529,112 24,860,000 22,945,000 24,438,166 29,887,281 31,518,741 28,965,570 17,411,572 15,274,342 44.40%38.91%36.81%37.70%58.81%60.04% Assessed Value $443,122,808 Bonded Debt Limit - 8.625% of Assessed Value 38,219,342 Amount of Debt Applicable to Limit 22,945,000 Legal Debt Margin 15,274,342 Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2013 148 Governmental Activities April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Fiscal Year Coverage 2004 $30,661 $- $199,973 $- $230,634 $50,000 $25,793 3.04 2005 34,089 - 266,318 - 300,407 55,000 24,293 3.79 2006 70,997 - 266,560 2,548,784 2,886,341 55,000 124,045 16.12 2007 130,078 696,096 291,666 2,676,261 3,794,101 90,000 426,142 7.35 2008 177,205 933,623 328,650 2,506,434 3,945,912 220,000 317,662 7.34 2009 215,853 922,095 307,882 2,500,285 3,946,115 235,000 308,801 7.26 2010 222,927 833,669 434,263 2,446,099 3,936,958 405,000 299,239 5.59 2011 234,718 873,999 425,971 2,569,233 4,103,921 425,000 283,604 5.79 2012 263,240 828,426 417,416 2,552,483 4,061,565 440,000 267,104 5.74 2013 39,980 835,972 402,932 2,490,503 3,769,387 460,000 249,609 5.31 Notes: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the Notes to the Financial Statements. Series 2002 Bonds are payable from Motor Fuel Taxes and incremental taxes, if any, from the Fox Industrial Park Area of the City; the Series 2005 Bonds are payable from revenues from Sales Taxes; and the Series 2005A Bonds are payable from Utility Taxes. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Pledged-Revenue Coverage - Last Ten Fiscal Years Incremental Municipal Debt Service Motor Property Municipal Net AvailableSales Tax Tax Tax Principal InterestTaxRevenue Utility Fuel 149 Business-Type Activities April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Fiscal Year Coverage 2004 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $N/A 2005 12,666,654 8,336,791 612,425 - 4,942,288 - 100,196 49.33 2006 6,133,618 3,271,081 679,842 - 3,542,379 120,000 150,437 13.10 2007 4,326,932 2,696,903 1,040,678 - 2,670,707 160,000 708,001 3.08 2008 4,259,945 2,528,710 1,053,292 - 2,784,527 240,000 777,258 2.74 2009 5,278,990 2,339,379 1,004,980 - 3,944,591 230,000 789,840 3.87 2010 3,738,010 1,978,482 1,277,889 - 3,037,417 235,000 813,634 2.90 2011 4,020,017 1,895,466 1,315,321 - 3,439,872 250,000 804,306 3.26 2012 5,891,708 2,776,270 1,444,426 410,327 4,970,191 260,000 793,668 4.72 2013 4,432,710 2,895,830 1,587,324 1,919,423 5,043,627 270,000 769,100 4.85 Notes: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. Water and Sewer revenues exclude capital contributions and developer donations. Operating expenses do not include depreciation or amortization expenses. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Pledged-Revenue Coverage - Last Ten Fiscal Years Principal Interest Less: Debt Service Net Available Revenue Expenses Sewer Revenues Water and Operating Rule Tax Non-Home Sales Tax State Income 150 April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) School Calendar Population Median Enrollment Unemployment Year (1)Age (1)(2)Rate (3) 2003 8,789 $341,828,714 $30,537 33.2 2,615 3.60% 2004 8,789 358,599,883 30,424 33.2 2,864 3.40% 2005 11,204 375,514,878 30,685 33.2 3,172 3.20% 2006 11,204 402,538,733 31,750 33.2 3,561 2.60% 2007 11,204 424,522,760 32,976 33.2 4,270 3.10% 2008 16,838 434,960,364 34,608 33.2 4,774 3.80% 2009 16,838 408,689,885 33,213 33.2 5,105 6.60% 2010 16,921 420,050,647 35,360 32.4 5,283 6.40% 2011 16,921 432,442,141 38,151 32.4 5,426 5.90% 2012 16,921 436,998,041 38,151 32.4 5,474 5.20% Data Source: (1) U.S. Census (2) Data provided by School District Administrative Offices (3) Illinois Department of Employment Security, Economic Information and Analysis (4) U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis: Chicago-Naperville-Joliet Metropolitan Statistical Area Income (4) UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Demographic and Economic Statistics - Last Ten Calendar Years Personal Income (4) Per Capita Personal 151 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Principal Employers - Current Calendar Year and Nine Calendar Years Ago April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Percentage Percentage of Total of Total City City Employer Rank Employment Rank Employment Raging Waves (Seasonal)450 1 2.66% Wrigley Manufacturing Co.335 2 1.98%500 1 5.69% Super Target 180 3 1.06% Mendards Mega Store 140 4 0.83% Jewel/Osco 130 5 0.77% Newlywed Foods 130 5 0.77%115 2 1.31% Kohl's 115 6 0.68% Boombah, Inc 90 7 0.53% Hillside Health Care Center 90 7 0.53% Home Depot 85 8 0.50% Wheatland Title 65 9 0.38% Marshalls 50 10 0.30% Brenart Eye Clinic 50 3 0.57% Cascade Water Works Mfg. Co,40 4 0.46% C.J. Insulation, Inc 40 4 0.46% Bristol Equipment Co.25 5 0.28% G.H. Haws & Assoc.25 5 0.28% Alphs Precision 20 6 0.23% Waste Technology, Inc.20 6 0.23% 1,860 10.99%835 9.50% Data Source: City Economic Development Corporation Records and Illinois Manufacturers Directory. Employees Employees 2012 Calendar Year 2003 Calendar Year 152 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Full-Time and Part-Time Equivalent Government Employees by Function - Last Ten Fiscal Years 2004 2005 2006 Full Time General Government Administration 8 12 13 Finance N/A N/A N/A Community Relations N/A N/A N/A Engineering 4 5 5 Community Development N/A N/A N/A Public Safety Police Officers 21 23 24 Civilians 2 3 3 Public Works Streets 4 4 5 Water 5 6 6 Sewer 1 2 4 Culture & Recreation Parks 2 9 7 Recreation 5 6 6 Library 3 3 4 Part Time General Government Administration 1 3 1 Finance N/A N/A N/A Community Relations N/A N/A N/A Engineering - - - Community Development N/A N/A N/A Public Safety Police Officers 1 5 3 Civilians 3 3 4 Public Works Water - 1 - Parks & Recreation Parks 4 6 6 Recreation 7 11 18 Library 11 11 12 Total 82 113 121 Data Source: City Human Resource Department N/A - Not Available April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) 153 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 15 9 7 5 4 4 4 N/A 6 6 5 4 4 4 N/A N/A 1 1 - - - 5 6 7 4 3 - - 4 6 5 4 3 2 3 28 29 30 27 25 25 26 4 5 5 5 3 3 2 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 5.5 5.3 4 4 3 4 3 3.5 3.3 9 9 9 8 8 8 9 7 7 7 6 4 4 6 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 2 1 - - - - 1 N/A N/A - - - - - N/A N/A 1 - - - - - - - - - - - N/A N/A - 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 3 5 6 7 7 7 6 6 7 9 - - - - - - - 5 5 1 2 2 3 4 27 33 29 38 40 40 16 31 35 33 33 30 30 26 164 180 169 168 155 155 136 154 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Operating Indicators by Function/Program - Last Ten Fiscal Years 2004 2005 2006 2007 Police Arrests Made 1,168 1,308 1,536 1,506 Parking Violations N/A N/A N/A N/A Traffic Violations 5,692 6,960 2,848 6,610 Reports Taken 2,251 2,598 3,006 3,290 Calls for Service 10,616 11,000 13,435 15,031 Community Development Permits Issued 1,089 1,571 1,395 1,420 Public Works Street Resurfacing (Miles)3.84 2.92 - - Snow and Ice Control (Tons of Salt)N/A N/A N/A 991.48 Pothole Repairs (Tons of Asphalt)N/A N/A N/A 19.87 Water Number of Accounts 3,336 3,766 4,376 5,129 Total Annual Consumption (Cubic Feet)N/A N/A N/A N/A Average Daily Consumption (Cubic Feet)N/A N/A N/A N/A Data Source: Various City Departments * Police information is presented on a calendar year basis. Operating indicators for 2013 are thru June. N/A - Not Available April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) 155 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1,891 1,732 657 531 700 350* N/A N/A 845 918 1,501 408* 9,571 10,891 4,436 3,729 4,338 2,298* 3,479 3,302 2,798 2,236 1,815 869* 17,523 18,614 13,533 12,170 13,311 5,959* 1,173 725 593 570 566 593 2.99 - - - - - 2,448.75 2,274.78 2,213.00 1,900.03 1,986.36 1,080.67 325.21 52.18 246.05 226.96 286.43 335.91 5,669 5,862 5,969 6,051 5,947 6,189 N/A 59,363,940 59,485,277 62,574,451 59,828,300 66,401,150 N/A 162,641 162,973 171,437 163,913 181,921 156 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program - Last Ten Fiscal Years 2004 2005 2006 Public Safety Police Stations 1.00 1.00 1.00 Patrol Units N/A N/A N/A Public Works Streets (Miles)36.28 36.28 36.28 Traffic Signals 16.00 17.00 17.00 Storm Sewers (Miles)35.53 36.54 40.72 Water Water Mains (Miles)29.05 29.05 38.80 Fire Hydrants 852 852 906 Sewer Sanitary Sewers (Miles)33.36 34.21 34.88 Lift Stations 2.00 3.00 3.00 Data Source: Various City Departments N/A - Not Available April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) 157 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A N/A N/A 23.00 24.00 19.00 20.00 41.56 44.29 45.49 56.00 59.56 60.79 82.00 19.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 26.00 48.17 54.10 55.65 68.90 69.63 72.91 80.43 41.56 46.64 47.37 58.85 59.88 61.97 66.65 929 989 1,001 1,188 1,207 1,239 1,327 37.88 42.71 43.01 53.43 54.25 55.48 59.29 4.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 158 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS New Permits and Construction Values - Last Ten Calendar Years Calendar Permits Permits Permits Permits Year Issued Issued Issued Issued 2004 21 $N/A 470 $N/A 3 $N/A 494 $N/A 2005 42 19,816,700 508 90,925,761 105 16,132,690 655 126,875,151 2006 42 27,155,000 448 77,019,310 275 52,593,360 765 156,767,670 2007 62 67,661,597 282 51,887,148 137 20,854,148 481 140,402,893 2008 39 12,776,625 105 18,993,634 52 10,788,180 196 42,558,439 2009 19 11,122,644 56 13,229,042 8 1,600,000 83 25,951,686 2010 11 445,727 43 12,155,740 6 529,607 60 13,131,074 2011 6 4,742,704 43 6,285,744 - - 49 11,028,448 2012 7 1,016,600 69 10,318,804 - - 76 11,335,404 2013*3 204,000 62 9,225,065 - - 65 9,429,065 Data Source: City Records * Includes permits issued through July 31, 2013. N/A - Not Available Residential Construction Multi-Family Total April 30, 2013 (Unaudited) Commercial Construction Residential Construction Single-Family Construction Value Construction Value Construction Value Construction Value Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number CA #1 Tracking Number PW 2013-39 Water Department Reports for May, June, & July 2013 City Council – October 8, 2013 PW 9/17/13 Moved forward to CC consent agenda. PW 2013-39 Majority Approval Monthly water reports that are submitted to the IEPA. Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number CA #2 Tracking Number PW 2013-40 Safe Routes to School Authorization of Contract Changes City Council – October 8, 2013 Consideration of Approval Authorization Approval Consideration Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department The purpose of this memo is to present Authorization 1 for the above referenced project. An authorization, as defined by IDOT, is the written approval of a contract change and the written directive to the contractor to perform said work. By this definition, it alters the contract work from that awarded under the competitive bidding process. An Authorization of Contract Changes signed by the Regional Engineer signifies completed review of and support for the change proposed. Background: The State of Illinois and Alliance Contractors, Inc. entered into an agreement for a contract value of $256,505.72 for the above referenced project. Construction began on April 15, 2013 and is complete. The construction costs are being funded by 100 percent Federal participation up to the maximum federal participation amount. The maximum federal participation amount is $280,000.00, inclusive of all change orders (authorizations) and construction engineering associated with this contract. The construction amount indicated in the Local Agency Agreement for Federal Participation was $243,490.00. Questions Presented: Should the City approve Authorization No. 1 in the amount of -$24,508.70? Discussion: Authorization No. 1 is a balancing authorization to balance all of the awarded contract values up or down to the final construction values. Authorization No. 1 has a value of -$24,508.70. The net change to date of total authorizations is -$24,508.70, which is a 9.55% decrease to the original contract value; a revised contract value to date of $231,997.02. The City’s responsibility does not change. We are projecting that there will be approximately $10-12,000 remaining after construction and construction engineering is finalized. At this point, it would be difficult to have the contractor re-mobilize (additional costs) and to complete any additional work since it would be a small amount. We are recommending approval of the Authorization. Action Required: Consideration of approval from the City Council for Authorization 1. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: August 28, 2013 Subject: Safe Routes to School – Authorization 1 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number CA #3 Tracking Number PW 2013-41 River Road Bridge Authorizations of Contract Changes City Council – October 8, 2013 Consideration of Approval Authorization Approval Consideration Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number CA #4 Tracking Number ADM 2013-47 Monthly Treasurer’s Reports for July & August 2013 City Council – October 8, 2013 Majority Approval Rob Fredrickson Finance Name Department J u l y R e v e n u e s Y T D R e v e n u e s Re v e n u e s Bu d g e t % o f YT D Bu d g e t J u l y E x p e n s e s Y T D E x p e n s e s Expenses Budget % of YTD Budget Ge n e r a l F u n d 01 - G e n e r a l 8 5 5 , 2 7 3 4 , 0 3 4 , 7 0 4 1 3 , 0 0 9 , 4 8 9 3 1 % 9 3 9 , 4 4 5 2 , 8 8 7 , 9 4 9 1 3 , 8 9 1 , 5 6 0 21% Sp e c i a l R e v e n u e F u n d s 15 - M o t o r F u e l T a x 2 9 , 8 1 1 1 0 2 , 4 8 2 9 4 4 , 0 0 0 1 1 % 1 0 , 4 0 9 4 2 , 2 9 9 1 , 3 9 4 , 4 5 6 3% 79 - P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n 1 8 9 , 2 9 1 6 5 9 , 5 4 7 2 , 2 2 8 , 7 0 4 3 0 % 9 4 , 4 1 9 3 2 9 , 9 0 2 2 , 1 9 9 , 0 4 8 15% 72 - L a n d C a s h 1 8 , 4 6 4 3 3 , 5 3 1 1 6 6 , 5 0 0 2 0 % 3 , 4 0 6 3 , 4 0 6 8 9 , 0 0 0 4% 87 - C o u n t r y s i d e T I F 1 1 4 2 1 , 5 5 0 3 % - 5 9 , 0 0 2 2 , 1 0 5 , 1 1 3 3% 88 - D o w n t o w n T I F 6 2 6 3 8 , 4 4 5 3 5 , 3 5 0 1 0 9 % 3 , 1 9 5 9 , 6 2 8 4 5 , 3 5 0 21% 11 - F o x H i l l S S A 8 7 1 , 9 5 5 3 , 7 8 6 5 2 % - 3 9 1 7 , 5 0 0 5% 12 - S u n f l o w e r S S A 5 0 3 , 8 5 0 7 , 5 3 1 5 1 % 8 1 2 2 , 8 7 1 1 4 , 9 8 5 19% De b t S e r v i c e F u n d 42 - D e b t S e r v i c e 7 , 1 6 4 1 7 3 , 9 7 5 3 2 9 , 4 7 9 5 3 % - 5 6 , 9 6 4 3 2 8 , 5 5 4 17% Ca p i t a l F u n d s 16 - M u n i c i p a l B u i l d i n g 5 0 , 3 6 5 1 4 6 , 6 8 4 5 7 3 , 3 7 4 2 6 % 1 , 9 6 5 3 , 7 8 0 - - 25 - V e h i c l e a n d E q u i p m e n t 3 2 , 2 6 6 7 5 , 1 9 2 2 5 9 , 7 5 0 2 9 % 1 2 , 7 4 9 8 0 , 1 5 2 3 4 7 , 4 6 2 23% 23 - C i t y - W i d e C a p i t a l 4 1 , 8 1 6 2 2 7 , 5 8 3 1 , 7 8 0 , 1 7 2 1 3 % 2 2 , 9 7 0 3 9 , 8 9 0 1 , 4 6 2 , 5 5 6 3% En t e r p r i s e F u n d s 51 - W a t e r 5 4 , 4 4 9 4 9 3 , 4 6 5 2 , 6 4 1 , 0 9 1 1 9 % 1 0 5 , 7 3 6 5 0 8 , 5 2 0 2 , 8 5 9 , 5 9 5 18% 52 - S e w e r 1 0 3 , 7 2 0 5 3 7 , 2 2 6 2 , 3 5 5 , 2 2 0 2 3 % 7 6 , 7 4 0 4 5 3 , 2 2 3 2 , 5 7 0 , 1 2 0 18% 80 - R e c r e a t i o n C e n t e r 1 , 7 6 6 4 5 , 9 3 0 6 1 7 , 9 5 7 7 % 1 3 , 8 4 5 2 2 9 , 1 0 2 1 5 0 , 4 8 9 152% Li b r a r y F u n d s 82 - L i b r a r y O p e r a t i o n s 1 3 , 1 5 5 3 9 9 , 3 3 2 7 7 8 , 6 3 9 5 1 % 4 3 , 8 9 0 1 5 1 , 9 8 4 7 7 1 , 3 6 3 20% 83 - L i b r a r y D e b t S e r v i c e 8 , 2 2 7 3 9 5 , 9 3 7 7 7 1 , 9 6 3 5 1 % - 5 3 , 9 3 4 7 6 9 , 6 3 8 7% 84 - L i b r a r y C a p i t a l 7 , 3 5 2 3 9 , 8 5 3 2 0 , 0 2 0 1 9 9 % 2 , 8 4 5 6 , 2 8 3 3 8 , 8 5 0 16% To t a l F u n d s 1, 4 1 3 , 8 9 2 7 , 4 0 9 , 7 3 1 2 6 , 5 2 4 , 5 7 5 2 8 % 1 , 3 3 2 , 4 2 6 4 , 9 1 9 , 2 8 0 2 9 , 0 4 5 , 6 3 9 17% Ro b F r e d r i c k s o n , F i n a n c e D i r e c t o r / D e p u t y T r e a s u r e r Ca s h B a s i s As D e p u t y T r e a s u r e r o f t h e U n i t e d C i t y o f Y o r k v i l l e , I h e r e b y a t t e s t , t o t h e b e s t o f m y k n o w l e d g e , t h a t t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n ed i n t h i s T r e a s u r e r ' s R e p o r t i s a c c u r a t e a s o f t h e da t e d e t a i l e d h e r e i n . F u r t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n i s a v a i l a b l e i n t h e F i n a n c e D e p a r t m e n t . UN I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E TR E A S U R E R ' S R E P O R T - f o r t h e p e r i o d e n d i n g J u l y 3 1 , 2 0 1 3 Beginning Fund Balance August Revenues YTD Revenues Revenues Budget % of YTD Budget August Expenses YTD Expenses Expenses Budget % of YTD Budget Projected Ending Fund Balance General Fund 01 - General 4,223,820 1,064,445 5,099,155 13,009,489 39%1,486,073 4,371,955 13,891,560 31%4,951,020 Special Revenue Funds 15 - Motor Fuel Tax 1,162,506 34,938 137,419 944,000 15%20,984 63,283 1,394,456 5%1,236,642 79 - Parks and Recreation 320,370 170,246 831,143 2,228,704 37%280,051 732,120 2,199,048 33%419,393 72 - Land Cash 121,420 6,153 39,684 166,500 24%12,000 15,406 89,000 17%145,698 87 - Countryside TIF 1,572,335 12 54 1,550 3%950 59,952 2,105,113 3%1,512,437 88 - Downtown TIF 216,937 2,377 40,822 35,350 115%5,749 15,377 45,350 34%242,383 11 - Fox Hill SSA 15,124 172 2,127 3,786 56%1,131 1,522 7,500 20%15,729 12 - Sunflower SSA 7,740 427 4,277 7,531 57%2,420 5,291 14,985 35%6,726 Debt Service Fund 42 - Debt Service 12,046 10,146 184,121 329,479 56%- 56,964 328,554 17%139,203 Capital Funds 16 - Municipal Building (571,615) 48,085 194,768 573,374 34%450 4,230 - - (381,077) 25 - Vehicle and Equipment 175,588 18,419 93,611 259,750 36%88,104 168,256 347,462 48%100,943 23 - City-Wide Capital 328,726 246,407 473,989 1,780,172 27%125,239 165,129 1,462,556 11%637,587 Enterprise Funds 51 - Water 1,526,679 444,154 939,967 2,641,091 36%214,668 723,188 2,859,595 25%1,743,459 52 - Sewer 2,993,332 278,288 815,514 2,355,220 35%97,718 550,941 2,570,120 21%3,257,905 80 - Recreation Center (300,420) 41,122 207,870 617,957 34%3,877 232,978 150,489 155%(325,529) Library Funds 82 - Library Operations 446,136 26,590 425,922 778,639 55%81,329 233,313 771,363 30%638,745 83 - Library Debt Service - 26,829 422,766 771,963 55%- 53,934 769,638 7%368,831 84 - Library Capital 15,689 3,002 42,855 20,020 214%5,307 11,589 38,850 30%46,955 Total Funds 12,266,413 2,421,813 9,956,066 26,524,575 38%2,426,048 7,465,428 29,045,639 26%14,757,050 Rob Fredrickson, Finance Director/Deputy Treasurer Cash Basis As Deputy Treasurer of the United City of Yorkville, I hereby attest, to the best of my knowledge, that the information contained in this Treasurer's Report is accurate as of the date detailed herein. Further information is available in the Finance Department. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE TREASURER'S REPORT - for the period ending August 31, 2013 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes #1 Tracking Number CC 2013-63 Minutes of the City Council – August 27, 2013 City Council – October 8, 2013 Majority Approval Approval of Minutes Beth Warren City Clerk Name Department MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2013 Mayor Golinski called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Warren called the roll. Ward I Koch Present Colosimo Present Ward II Milschewski Present Kot Present Ward III Frieders Present Funkhouser Present Ward IV Spears Absent Teeling Present Also present: City Clerk Warren, Attorney Binninger, City Administrator Olson, Police Chief Hart, Deputy Chief of Police Hilt, Public Works Director Dhuse, Finance Director Fredrickson, EEI Engineer Sanderson, Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble, Director of Park and Recreation Schraw, Administrative Intern Weckbach QUORUM A quorum was established. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Mayor Golinski tabled item # 1 under Public Works Kendall Marketplace Infrastructure (PW 2013-36), item # 1 under Economic Development Committee Ordinance Approving a Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area (Imperial Investments, LLC) (EDC 2013-28), and item # 2 under Plan Commission Grande Reserve Amendment to the Amended Annexation and PUD Agreement (PC 2013-07). Alderman Koch made a motion to approve the agenda as amended; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Amendment approved unanimously by a viva voce vote. PRESENTATIONS Government Transparency Award presented to the City by the Illinois Policy Institute Mayor Golinski called Brian Costin up to the front. Mr. Costin presented the City with a Government Transparency Award. Mr. Costin told the Council about the Illinois Policy Institute and the award. Recognition of Lions Club for their Donation of a Shelter at Bridge Park Mayor Golinski called Don Hirsch from the Lions Club up and presented a plaque to him in recognition of the Lions Club donation of a shelter at Bridge Park. Don Hirsch gave a little background on the Lions Club. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PC 2013-09 – Mr. Peter Occhipinti, Petitioner and Owner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting annexation by an annexation agreement for an approximately 0.87 acre parcel of land located in unincorporated Kendall County. The subject property is generally located east of Illinois Route 47, immediately south of McHugh Road, and just west of Farmstead Drive in Kendall County, Illinois. It is proposed that the subject property be zoned within the City’s R-4 General Residence District for a future multifamily residence development. 2. PC 2013-12 – An amendment to that certain Annexation Agreement (Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision) dated April 26, 2005 by and among Yorkville Farms Development, LLC. (Owner/Developer), an Illinois Limited Liability Corporation, and the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, for the purpose of amending the agreement regarding a re-subdivision of Lot 358 for a private high school with accessory uses, recalculation of impact fees, revised school and park land-cash fees, extension of fee and ordinance locks and other miscellaneous site development improvements related to the proposed school land use. The proposed accessory uses and improvements may include a retail school store; an equestrian arena and stable; cellular telephone tower; wind turbine; electronic scoreboard, public address system, lighting and concession/restrooms for athletic fields; outdoor storage of farm equipment, grain bins and greenhouses; street parking along Mustang Way and delayed construction of on-site parking; DRAFT The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – August 27, 2013 – Page 2 of 4 school bus parking and garage; an off-premise electronic school identification sign; and building height exceptions. 3. Countryside TIF Bond Refinancing Please, see attached report of proceedings by the Court Reporter for the public hearing. CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS Kathy Neddo, a citizen, thanked the Council for doing a great job over the past year. Jim Motto, citizen, is one of the four houses in the subdivision that will be affected by the new high school. He stated the Stewarts have been very forth coming with information. He discussed the dangers of Route 126. He is concerned about his neighborhood's covenants and the property value of his home. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors (KKCOM) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Application – authorize staff to submit 2013 Call for Projects application for Mill Street LAFO project funding (PW 2013-37) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye, Milschewski-aye, Frieders-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Koch-aye, Teeling-aye, Kot-aye MINUTES FOR APPROVAL 1. Minutes of the City Council – July 23, 2013 (CC 2013-59) 2. Minutes of the City Council – August 13, 2013 (CC 2013-60) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the minutes of the regular City Council meeting for July 23, 2013 and August 13, 2013 as presented. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Frieders. Amendment approved unanimously by a viva voce vote. BILLS FOR PAYMENT Mayor Golinski stated that the bills were $982,887.38. REPORTS MAYOR’S REPORT Ordinance 2013-51 Approving the Second Amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement (Windett Ridge Subdivision) (CC 2013-61) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving the second amendment to the planned unit development agreement (Windett Ridge Subdivision) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Funkhouser; seconded by Alderman Colosimo. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Frieders-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT Kendall Marketplace Infrastructure (PW 2013-36) Mayor Golinski stated this was tabled. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT Ordinance Approving a Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area (Imperial Investments, LLC) (EDC 2013-28) Mayor Golinski stated this was tabled. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PARK BOARD The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – August 27, 2013 – Page 3 of 4 No report. PLAN COMMISSION Priority Health Annexation and Zoning (PC 2013-04 and PC 2013-05) Ordinance 2013-52 Approving an Annexation Agreement Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving an annexation agreement (Priority Health and Body Makeover, Inc.) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye, Frieders-aye, Colosimo-aye Ordinance 2013-53 Annexing Certain Territory to the United City of Yorkville Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance annexing certain territory (Priority Health and Body Makeover, Inc.) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Frieders. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Kot-aye, Frieders-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye Ordinance 2013-54 Approving the Zoning into the B-2 General Business District for the Property Located on the West Side of Route 47 Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving zoning into the B-2 general business district for the property located on the west side of Route 47 (Priority Health and Body Makeover, Inc.) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Frieders. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Frieders-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye Grande Reserve Amendment to the Amended Annexation and PUD Agreement (PC 2013-07) Mayor Golinski stated this was tabled. Midland States Bank (PC 2013-08) Ordinance 2013-55 Approving a Special Use Permit for a Bank with Drive-Through Facilities Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving a special use for a bank with a drive-through facility (Midland States Bank - 38 West Countryside Parkway) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Milchewski; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye, Frieders-aye ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS No report. CITY COUNCIL REPORT No report. CITY CLERK’S REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER’S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY & LIAISON REPORT Aurora Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Alderman Funkhouser reported on the AACVB Board Meeting. School Board The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – August 27, 2013 – Page 4 of 4 Alderman Funkhouser reported on the school board meeting. Middle school curriculum and scheduling issues were discussed, along with the high school expansion. Alderman Funkhouser relayed a compliment from the school to Public Works Director Dhuse and his staff. Push for the Path Alderman Teeling reported that the Push for the Path golf outing is coming up on September 28, 2013. STAFF REPORT Hometown Days Director of Park and Recreation Schraw and Mayor Golinski reported on Hometown Days and gave a brief overview of the events. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Farmers Market Alderman Milschewski discussed the turnout for the Saturday morning farmer's market. Director of Park and Recreation Schraw will look into this issue. Administrator Olson said the EDC had directed the Park Board to come up with recommendations to improve the farmer's market. Senior Services Fashion Show Mayor Golinski stated that he was going to be a fashion model for the Senior Services Fashion Show on Sunday September 15, 2013. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to go into Executive Session for the purpose of 1. For the discussion of minutes of meetings lawfully closed under the Open Meetings Act, whether for purposes of approval by the body of the minutes or semi-annual review of the minutes. There was no motion or second. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Golinski announced meeting adjourned. Meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Beth Warren, City Clerk, City of Yorkville, Illinois Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes #2 Tracking Number CC 2013-66 Minutes of the City Council – September 10, 2013 City Council – October 8, 2013 Majority Approval Approval of Minutes Lisa Pickering Administration Name Department MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 Mayor Golinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Deputy City Clerk Pickering called the roll. Ward I Colosimo Present Koch Present Ward II Milschewski Present Kot Present Ward III Funkhouser Present Frieders Present Ward IV Spears Present Teeling Present Also present: Deputy City Clerk Pickering, City Attorney Orr, City Administrator Olson, Chief of Police Hart, Deputy Chief of Police Hilt, Public Works Director Dhuse, Finance Director Fredrickson, Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble, EEI Engineer Sanderson, and Administrative Intern Weckbach. QUORUM A quorum was established. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. PRESENTATIONS None. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS None. CONSENT AGENDA None. MINUTES FOR APPROVAL None. BILLS FOR PAYMENT (Informational): $513,678.73 REPORTS MAYOR’S REPORT Resolution 2013-16 of Support for State Funding of the Northern Route 47 Corridor (CC 2013-62) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve a Resolution of Support for State Funding of the Northern Route 47 Corridor and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Milschewski-aye, Koch-aye, Teeling-aye, Frieders-aye, Kot-aye, Colosimo-aye, Spears-aye, Funkhouser-aye PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT Kendall Marketplace Infrastructure (PW 2013-36) A motion was made by Alderman Teeling to engage Geneva Construction to complete public improvements in an amount not to exceed $64,788.05 and to complete private improvements in an amount not to exceed $52,476.10, as described in the memo dated September 3, 2013 from EEI Engineer Sanderson; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. DRAFT The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – September 10, 2013 – Page 2 of 5 Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Koch-aye, Teeling-aye, Frieders-aye, Kot-aye, Colosimo-aye, Spears-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye A motion was made by Alderman Teeling to approve the proposal from Encap to complete necessary work on the detention basin in an amount not to exceed $52,235.00 and authorize staff to execute; seconded by Alderman Frieders. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Spears-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Koch-aye, Teeling-aye, Frieders-aye, Kot-aye, Colosimo-aye 2013 Road to Better Roads Program a. Contract Award for MFT Work b. Contract Award for Non-MFT Work (PW 2013-38) A motion was made by Alderman Teeling to award the contract for MFT funded portion of the 2013 Road to Better Roads Program to D Construction, Co., in an amount not to exceed $232,028.67 and to award the contract for the non-MFT funded portion of the 2013 Road to Better Roads Program to D Construction, Co., in an amount not to exceed $454,955.16; seconded by Alderman Colosimo. Alderman Spears said that she had received many complaints about the last job that D Construction had worked on in Yorkville and she said that she would like to go with the second highest bidder. Alderman Spears asked Public Works Director Dhuse if there had been problems with the paving work that D Construction had performed on Van Emmon. Director Dhuse explained that the paving that had been done on Van Emmon was meant to be temporary paving, as the paving would be torn up a few more times before the Route 47 widening project was complete. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-1 Teeling-aye, Frieders-aye, Kot-aye, Colosimo-aye, Spears-nay, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Koch-aye ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT Ordinance Approving a Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area (Imperial Investments, LLC) (EDC 2013-28) A motion was made by Alderman Koch to approve an Ordinance Approving the Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area (Imperial Investments, LLC) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute; seconded by Alderman Milschewski. Alderman Frieders mentioned that the September Economic Development Committee (EDC) meeting had been cancelled and he felt that this item should be tabled back to EDC so that the committee could discuss it. Alderman Colosimo commented that changes were made to the agreement to pay the costs out of the TIF fund rather than the general fund; however, he still feels that an 80/20 split of the costs is disproportionate as this is not something that the city has to do. He feels that 80 percent of the cost is too high for the city to pay for a project that is being requested by a developer who feels that the power lines should be buried because they are unsightly. Alderman Colosimo understands that the money will come out of the TIF funds; however, there may be work that will need to be done on the east side of Route 47 that the TIF funds could be used for. A motion was made by Alderman Frieders to table this item and bring it back to the Economic Development Committee for further discussion; seconded by Alderman Colosimo. Motion to table approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Frieders-aye, Kot-aye, Colosimo-aye, Spears-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Koch-aye, Teeling-aye PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT No report. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – September 10, 2013 – Page 3 of 5 PARK BOARD No report. PLAN COMMISSION 1100 McHugh Road (Occhipinti) Request for Annexation and Zoning (PC 2013-09 and PC 2013-10) Mayor Golinski stated that this request had been withdrawn by the petitioner, so no further action was needed. Ordinance Approving the First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development – Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision (Yorkville Christian School) (PC 2013-12) Ordinance Approving the Resubdivision of Lot 358 of the Prestwick Unit 1 Final Plat of Subdivision (Yorkville Christian School Subidivison) (PC 2013-13) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an Ordinance Approving the First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development – Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision (Yorkville Christian School) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Attorney John Philipchuck spoke on behalf of the petitioners, John and Michelle Stewart. He said that there were still a few issues to be worked out in regards to the amendment to the annexation agreement and the approval of the final plat. One issue that remains is determining the value of an improved acre of land. He said that the city had an appraisal conducted in 2012, which gave a dollar amount of $30,000 per acre and the petitioners had an appraisal conducted in 2013, which gave a dollar amount of $25,000 per acre of land. City ordinance lists a dollar amount of $101,000 per acre and staff has recommended a dollar amount of $58,000 for this subdivision. Attorney Philipchuck said that he hopes that the developer and the city are close to agreeing on a dollar amount as the developer has an appraisal which lists $25,000 per acre and the city has an appraisal which lists $30,000 per acre. Attorney Philipchuck said that there is also an issue that relates to the final plat for the subdivision. He said that the city staff is recommending that the final plat be approved subject to the comments of the city engineer. The city engineer is recommending that the developer put in an off-site storm sewer to drain to the south of the property. In order to accommodate this storm sewer pipe, the developer would need to have the city acquire the necessary easements from the Block family. Attorney Philipchuck said that the Block family requested that the storm sewer be put in to eliminate any nuisance flows coming onto their property so he thinks it is only fair for the Block family to donate the necessary easements to city. He said that easements will also need to be acquired for the roadway improvements. Administrator Olson said that he wanted to clarify a few items for the City Council. He said that there are two ways to negotiate the land cash value. The first would be for the city to have an appraisal conducted to determine the value of an improved acre of land. Once the appraisal has been conducted, the City Council could approve an ordinance setting the land cash value. The adopted land cash value could then be applied to every piece of property. The second is for the City Council to negotiate a land cash value in the annexation agreement and to negotiate the timing of the payments. The land cash payments could be negotiated to be paid out in thirds, such as one-third being paid after credit is given for the parking lot paving, one-third being paid a year from the time of approval of the final plat, and the remaining third being paid two years from the time of approval of the final plat. Administrator Olson said that it might be advantageous to accept a lower dollar amount now, and to have the amount paid to the city in thirds, in a timely manner, rather than accepting a higher dollar amount that is paid out over a longer length of time. Alderman Colosimo said that he thinks that the land cash value of $101,000 that was set by ordinance in 2006 is not the current value of an acre of improved land and he thinks that the city should have a justification for the amount that it is using. Alderman Funkhouser said that he would like to be proactive and to work with the developer. He doesn’t think that the developer wants to wait while the city conducts another appraisal. Alderman Funkhouser thought that the city should use the $30,000 value from the 2012 appraisal so that the city could come to an agreement with the developer. Alderman Koch asked if the city negotiated a land cash value that was lower than the $101,000 approved in 2006, would that set a precedent for future developments. Administrator Olson said that the practice has been to negotiate when each annexation agreement comes through. Attorney Orr stated that the City Council can include any terms in the annexation agreement, as long as the terms are not prohibited by law. Administrator Olson said that the agreement sets the park contribution at ten acres. The development will have donated approximately six and a half acres, which leaves three and a half acres remaining. The City Council is negotiating the value of those three and a half acres of land. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – September 10, 2013 – Page 4 of 5 Alderman Frieders said that he would like the project to move forward, so he would like to negotiate a dollar amount for land cash now, with the money being paid to the city in thirds and then the city could look at doing an appraisal later. Alderman Colosimo said that he doesn’t want to see this development held up by the city taking time to get an appraisal. He would like to see the council negotiate a number right now through the agreement and then start the appraisal process for future projects. Alderman Colosimo said that he thinks that the 2012 appraisal that gave a dollar amount of $30,000 is much more in the ballpark than the dollar amount of $101,000 from the 2006 appraisal. Mayor Golinski asked Attorney Philipchuck if his client would be agreeable to a land cash value of $30,000 with the payments being made in thirds. Attorney Philipchuck said that his client would agree to those terms. A motion was made by Alderman Colosimo to amend the amended Exhibit C, Item11a to read: Value per acre - $30,000 and the rest of the notation be stricken; seconded by Alderman Teeling. Motion to amend approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Koch-aye, Teeling-aye, Frieders-aye, Kot-aye, Colosimo-aye, Spears-aye Alderman Colosimo asked that the City Council discuss the drainage issues further before the City Council votes on the amended annexation agreement and final plat. He said to implement the fix that the city engineer is requesting requires an easement from the Block family and he said that he would like to hear from either the Block family or their attorney on this issue. Attorney George Mahoney spoke on behalf of the Block family and said that he would like to meet with the Mayor and city staff to try to work something out. Attorney Mahoney also mentioned that the Block family was very concerned about safety along Route 126. He said that this project is proposing to build a school that is projected to hold 850 students, who will be turning off of Route 126 to enter this development. Attorney Mahoney passed out copies of the editorial that was printed in the September 5, 2013 edition of the Kendall County Record. This editorial called on the Kendall County Board and other local governmental agencies to adopt resolutions urging IDOT to improve the safety on Route 126. Additionally, he said that the Block family had an engineering firm review the traffic study and their engineer was recommending several additional turn lanes to help improve safety. Engineer Jeff Julkowski from Christopher Burke Engineering spoke to the City council and said that his firm had reviewed the traffic report and had recommendations for additional improvements to be added for safety. He said that on Ashley Road, based on the traffic numbers, they are recommending adding a southbound right turn lane into the development and also a northbound left turn lane into the development from Ashley to help make the traffic flow smoother. He also said that on Route 126, westbound left turn lanes are already recommended in the traffic report at both Penman and Ashley Roads; however, they are recommending that eastbound right turn lanes into the site at both roads would also be warranted, not just based on traffic, but also from a safety issue given how fast traffic flows on Route 126. He said that it would be much safer to have dedicated turn lanes to remove the turning cars from the fast moving traffic on Route 126. City Engineer Sanderson clarified a few of the items that had been discussed. He said that the storm sewer recommendations are being given to try to avoid the nuisance flow of storm water onto the Block’s property. He said that the recommendations for an off-site storm sewer were originally given in 2005 during the review of the preliminary engineering plans for this site. He further explained that putting in the off-site storm sewer does require cooperation from the adjacent property owners, so that an easement can be acquired. Engineer Sanderson said that in regards to the traffic study report, as it relates to Route 126, that those improvements will be dictated by IDOT. He said that he has not seen any comments come back from IDOT regarding the traffic study. Attorney Philipchuck said that he also wanted to make sure that everyone understood that Ashley Road is a prescriptive roadway, which means that the owners on both sides own the road and that the land is subject to an easement for roadway purposes. He said that in regards to the off-site storm sewer, the developer is proposing to go within that prescriptive right-of-way; they are not proposing to cut through the farm property for the storm sewer. Additionally, Attorney Philipchuck mentioned that back in July and August of 2006, two letters were sent to Attorney Dallas Ingemunson, who was the Block attorney at the time. Both letters specifically talked about the easements that would be needed to handle the stormwater that would be coming from the Prestwick development. Attorney Philipchuck said that back in 2006, the storm sewer was included in the Phase 2 development and there was not an immediate need at that time; however, now it has become an issue and there is an immediate need to acquire the easements for the storm sewer. He said that the easements have been prepared and are ready to go if the Block family agrees to grant the necessary easements. Attorney Philipchuck also mentioned that with the recommendations on the safety issues, if more room is needed to provide for the additional safety measures, he hopes that the Block family will cooperate if an easement is needed for a little more right- of-way, especially at the intersections. He said that if city staff facilitates a meeting, he would like to sit down and discuss the necessary easements with the Block’s attorney. Attorney Mahoney said that he is willing to meet with staff and Attorney Philipchuck before the next City Council meeting. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – September 10, 2013 – Page 5 of 5 Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to table both Prestwick ordinances to the September 24, 2013 City Council meeting. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion to table approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye, Spears-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Koch-aye, Teeling-aye, Frieders-aye, Kot-aye ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS No report. CITY COUNCIL REPORT No report. CITY CLERK’S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY & LIAISON REPORT No report. STAFF REPORT No report. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Hometown Days Mayor Golinski reported that the Hometown Days festival was rained out on Friday night and most of the Sunday. He said that the city staff was incredible and had a lot to contend with this year to keep the festival running in light of all of the rain. Senior Services Fashion Show Mayor Golinski reported that Senior Services would be hosting a fashion show on Sunday, September 15, 2013 and that he would be modeling attire from Marshalls. He invited everyone to attend the event. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to go into executive session for the discussion of minutes of meetings lawfully closed under the Open Meetings Act, whether for purposes of approval by the body of the minutes or semiannual review of the minutes and also for litigation, when an action against, affecting, or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting. So moved by Alderman Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Kot. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0 Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Koch-aye, Teeling-aye, Frieders-aye, Kot-aye, Colosimo-aye, Spears-aye The City Council entered executive session at 8:25 p.m. The City Council returned to regular session at 8:54 p.m. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to adjourn the meeting. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Teeling. Motion unanimously approved by a viva voce vote. Meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk, City of Yorkville, Illinois Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes #3 Tracking Number CC 2013-67 Minutes of the Special City Council – September 12, 2013 City Council – October 8, 2013 Majority Approval Approval of Minutes Lisa Pickering Administration Name Department MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM, 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2013 Mayor Pro Tem Funkhouser called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Deputy City Clerk Pickering called the roll. Ward I Colosimo Absent Koch Present Ward II Milschewski Present Kot Present Ward III Funkhouser Present Frieders Present Ward IV Spears Present Teeling Absent Also present: Deputy City Clerk Pickering and City Administrator Olson. QUORUM A quorum was established. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. BUSINESS Windett Ridge Settlement Agreement Amendment A motion was made by Alderman Koch to approve a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with The Ryland Group, Inc. d/b/a Ryland Homes, Wiseman Hughes Enterprises, Inc., Windett Ridge, LLC, and Travelers Indemnity Co. and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute; seconded by Alderman Spears. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-0 Milschewski-aye, Koch-aye, Frieders-aye, Kot-aye, Spears-aye, Funkhouser-aye ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Funkhouser entertained a motion to adjourn the meeting. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Spears. Motion unanimously approved by a viva voce vote. Meeting adjourned at 6:03 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk, City of Yorkville, Illinois DRAFT Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Bills for Payment Tracking Number Bills for Payment (Informational): $893,406.50 and $448,291.19 City Council – October 8, 2013 None – Informational Amy Simmons Finance Name Department DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 0 9 A A 0 0 0 0 0 3 D A N I E L V . T R A N S I E R 0 8 3 1 1 3 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - A U G . 0 7 & A U G . 2 1 A D M I N 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 H E A R I N G S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 1 0 A D V A A U T O A D V A N C E D A U T O M A T I O N & C O N T R O L S 1 3 - 1 9 1 6 0 8 / 0 2 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - I N T R U S I O N A L A R M 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 5 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 0 2 I N T E G R A T I O N S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 1 1 A D V A N D I S A D V A N C E D D I S P O S A L - B A T A V I A - T 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 9 5 3 9 4 3 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 H E A L T H & S A N I T A T I O N - A U G U S T 0 1 - 5 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 1 1 1 , 9 0 4 . 3 6 0 2 S E N I O R S E R V I C E * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 H E A L T H & S A N I T A T I O N - A U G U S T 0 1 - 5 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 2 8 2 , 1 5 0 . 6 5 0 4 S E R V I C E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 4 , 0 5 5 . 0 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 4 , 0 5 5 . 0 1 5 1 6 1 1 2 A M P E R A G E A M P E R A G E E L E C T R I C A L S U P P L Y I N C 0 4 7 6 0 7 8 - I N 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T W I S T L O C K 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 4 0 3 . 1 7 0 2 P H O T O C O N T R O L S , L A M P S , M I D G E T S , * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 V I N Y L T A P E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 0 3 . 1 7 * 0 4 7 6 1 9 2 - I N 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T W I S T L O C K 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 4 . 1 7 0 2 P H O T O C O N T R O L * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 4 . 1 7 * 1 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 1 2 A M P E R A G E A M P E R A G E E L E C T R I C A L S U P P L Y I N C 0 4 7 7 9 4 4 - I N 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - S O D I U M L A M P S , B A L L A S T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 4 4 4 . 8 4 0 2 K I T S , T W I S T L O C K P H O T O C O N T R O L S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 4 4 . 8 4 * 0 4 7 8 0 2 9 - I N 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - B A L L A S T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 5 6 7 4 . 5 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 4 . 5 9 * 0 4 7 8 0 3 0 - I N 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - O R A N G E W I R E N U T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 2 4 . 4 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 4 . 4 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 6 1 . 2 5 5 1 6 1 1 3 A R A M A R K A R A M A R K U N I F O R M S E R V I C E S 6 1 0 - 8 1 8 2 6 6 4 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - U N I F O R M S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 0 2 W A T E R O P - U N I F O R M S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 0 3 S E W E R O P - U N I F O R M S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 0 . 5 0 * 6 1 0 - 8 1 9 1 9 0 0 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - U N I F O R M S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 4 6 . 5 4 0 2 W A T E R O P - U N I F O R M S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 0 3 S E W E R O P - U N I F O R M S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 3 . 5 4 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 6 4 . 0 4 5 1 6 1 1 4 A R R O L A B A R R O L A B O R A T O R Y , I N C . 4 6 0 9 0 0 8 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C O L I F O R M 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 9 7 2 . 6 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 2 . 6 0 * 4 6 1 5 0 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C O L I F O R M 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 9 1 4 5 . 2 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 4 5 . 2 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 1 7 . 8 0 2 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 3 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 1 5 A T T A T & T 6 3 0 5 5 3 3 4 3 6 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 5 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - M O N T H L Y C H A R G E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 6 0 . 2 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 0 . 2 7 * 6 3 0 5 5 3 6 8 0 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 5 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - M O N T H L Y C H A R G E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 2 1 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 1 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 8 1 . 2 7 5 1 6 1 1 6 A T T L O N G A T & T L O N G D I S T A N C E 8 2 8 9 3 2 1 3 6 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A U G U S T L O N G D I S T A N C E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 . 6 1 0 2 P O L I C E - A U G U S T L O N G D I S T A N C E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 5 0 . 4 3 0 3 L I B R A R Y - A U G U S T L O N G D I S T A N C E 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 1 4 . 8 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 7 . 8 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 6 7 . 8 6 5 1 6 1 1 7 B A T T E R Y S B A T T E R Y S E R V I C E C O R P O R A T I O N 2 3 6 9 1 7 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - C O M M E R C I A L R E S C U E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 0 9 . 0 0 0 2 1 2 V B O O S T E R P A C K * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 1 8 B C B S B L U E C R O S S B L U E S H I E L D 0 9 0 6 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 5 , 9 2 4 . 8 4 0 2 A D M I N - E L E C T E D O F F I C I A L O C T O B E R 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 5 5 , 3 7 7 . 2 0 0 3 H E A L T H I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 F I N A N C E - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 , 5 3 4 . 9 4 0 5 P O L I C E - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 5 , 0 4 8 . 7 3 0 6 C O M M / D E V - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 , 4 8 4 . 7 2 0 7 S T R E E T S - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 7 , 8 8 4 . 2 5 3 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 4 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 1 8 B C B S B L U E C R O S S B L U E S H I E L D 0 9 0 6 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 8 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - R E T I R E E S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 4 0 7 , 0 4 0 . 9 5 0 9 O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 1 0 P A R K S - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 9 , 0 7 0 . 4 3 1 1 R E C R E A T I O N - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 4 , 9 7 3 . 7 8 1 2 W A T E R O P - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 7 , 4 0 8 . 3 8 1 3 S E W E R O P - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 , 9 7 5 . 2 7 1 4 L I B R A R Y - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 6 , 1 4 3 . 6 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 , 8 6 7 . 1 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 5 , 8 6 7 . 1 0 5 1 6 1 1 9 B U I L D E R S B U I L D E R S A S P H A L T L L C 1 0 2 8 2 0 8 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - C O L D P A T C H 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 3 9 4 6 . 2 0 0 2 H O T P A T C H 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 4 1 9 4 . 5 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 1 4 0 . 7 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 1 4 0 . 7 3 5 1 6 1 2 0 C A L L O N E U N I T E D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Y S T E M S 1 0 1 0 - 7 9 8 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 9 1 3 0 9 / 1 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A U G U S T A D M I N P H O N E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 5 4 . 4 7 0 2 C H A R G E S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A D M I N - A U G U S T C I T Y H A L L N O R T E L 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 7 7 . 5 0 0 4 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C I T Y H A L L N O R T E L 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 7 7 . 5 0 0 5 W A T E R O P - A U G . C I T Y H A L L N O R T E L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 7 7 . 4 9 0 6 P O L I C E - A U G U S T P O L I C E P H O N E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 7 3 0 . 0 0 0 7 C H A R G E S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 8 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C I T Y H A L L F I R E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 6 9 . 2 5 0 9 A D M I N - A U G U S T C I T Y H A L L F I R E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 6 9 . 2 5 1 0 L I B R A R Y - A U G U S T P H O N E C H A R G E S 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 9 1 . 8 5 1 1 W A T E R O P - A U G U S T P H O N E C H A R G E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 , 2 1 2 . 4 9 1 2 P A R K S - A U G U S T P H O N E C H A R G E S 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 4 7 . 9 1 1 3 R E C C E N T E R - C R E D I T F O R C A N C E L E D 8 0 - 8 0 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 - 2 4 4 . 9 8 4 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 5 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 2 0 C A L L O N E U N I T E D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Y S T E M S 1 0 1 0 - 7 9 8 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 9 1 3 0 9 / 1 5 / 1 3 1 4 A N D T R A N S F E R E D L I N E S * * C O M M E N T * * 1 5 R E C R E A T I O N - A U G U S T P H O N E 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 9 0 . 4 8 1 6 C H A R G E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 , 2 5 3 . 2 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 , 2 5 3 . 2 1 5 1 6 1 2 1 C A M B R I A C A M B R I A S A L E S C O M P A N Y I N C . 3 4 1 2 8 0 9 / 0 9 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - P A P E R T O W E L 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 5 5 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 5 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 5 . 5 0 5 1 6 1 2 2 C A R D I S C A R R O L L D I S T R I B U T I N G 3 4 9 7 6 9 0 8 / 1 6 / 1 3 0 1 L A N D C A S H - W O O D S T A K E S 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 1 2 5 . 4 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 5 . 4 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 2 5 . 4 0 5 1 6 1 2 3 C A R G I L L C A R G I L L , I N C 2 9 0 1 2 7 9 0 2 5 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - B U L K R O C K S A L T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 8 2 , 7 0 2 . 8 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 7 0 2 . 8 5 * 2 9 0 1 2 8 9 4 2 3 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - B U L K R O C K S A L T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 8 2 , 6 7 2 . 6 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 6 7 2 . 6 8 * 2 9 0 1 2 9 1 5 9 8 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - B U L K R O C K S A L T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 8 2 , 7 5 8 . 7 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 7 5 8 . 7 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 8 , 1 3 4 . 3 2 5 1 6 1 2 4 C E N T R A L L C E N T R A L L I M E S T O N E C O M P A N Y , I N C 5 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 6 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 2 4 C E N T R A L L C E N T R A L L I M E S T O N E C O M P A N Y , I N C 1 8 8 3 7 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 L A N D C A S H - G R A V E L 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 1 , 7 8 4 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 7 8 4 . 0 0 * 1 8 8 3 8 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - G R A V E L 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 4 3 4 . 0 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 3 4 . 0 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 , 2 1 8 . 0 8 5 1 6 1 2 5 C I N T A S F P C I N T A S C O R P O R A T I O N N O . 2 F 9 4 0 0 0 5 4 9 5 9 0 8 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - A L A R M R E P A I R 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 5 6 2 7 . 1 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 2 7 . 1 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 2 7 . 1 0 5 1 6 1 2 6 C I V I C A R T C I V I C A R T W O R K S 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 C O M M / D E V - I N I T I A L P Y M T F O R 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 C O M M E N C E M E N T O F C O N T R A C T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 F O R P R O J E C T P R O P O S A L R E L A T E D * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 T O Y O R K V I L L E Z O N I N G C O D E * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 R E V I S I O N * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 2 7 C O M C A S T C O M C A S T C A B L E 0 8 2 6 1 3 - P D 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - M O N T H L Y C A B L E C H A R G E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 4 . 2 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 . 2 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 . 2 3 5 1 6 1 2 8 C O M E D C O M M O N W E A L T H E D I S O N 6 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 7 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 2 8 C O M E D C O M M O N W E A L T H E D I S O N 0 1 8 5 0 7 9 1 0 9 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - 4 2 0 F A I R H A V E N 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 9 2 . 9 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 2 . 9 4 * 0 4 3 5 1 1 3 1 1 6 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - L I G H T S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 7 1 . 4 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 1 . 4 2 * 0 9 0 3 0 4 0 0 7 7 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - L I G H T S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 2 , 1 8 8 . 3 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 1 8 8 . 3 4 * 0 9 0 8 0 1 4 0 0 4 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - W E L L S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 5 5 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 5 . 9 8 * 0 9 6 6 0 3 8 0 7 7 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 4 5 6 K E N N E D Y R O A D 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 4 5 . 8 6 0 2 P R E S S U R E V A L V E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 5 . 8 6 * 1 1 8 3 0 8 8 1 0 1 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - 1 1 0 7 P R A I R I E C R O S S I N G 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 7 6 . 6 5 0 2 L I F T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 6 . 6 5 * 1 4 0 7 1 2 5 0 4 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - F O X H I L L 7 L I F T 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 5 8 . 1 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 8 . 1 1 * 2 0 1 9 0 9 9 0 4 4 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - W E L L S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 2 . 2 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 2 . 2 6 * 2 6 6 8 0 4 7 0 0 7 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - 1 9 0 8 R A I N T R E E R D 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 1 0 7 . 2 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 7 . 2 4 * 2 9 6 1 0 1 7 0 4 3 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - L I F T S T A T I O N 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 7 6 . 0 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 6 . 0 3 * 4 0 8 5 0 8 0 0 3 3 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 1 9 9 1 C A N N O N B A L L T R A I L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 1 0 6 . 3 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 6 . 3 7 * 7 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 8 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 2 8 C O M E D C O M M O N W E A L T H E D I S O N 4 4 4 9 0 8 7 0 1 6 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - L I F T S T A T I O N S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 5 7 5 . 2 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 7 5 . 2 2 * 4 4 7 5 0 9 3 0 5 3 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 6 1 0 T O W E R L A N E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 1 2 5 . 5 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 5 . 5 4 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 , 6 1 1 . 9 6 5 1 6 1 2 9 C O N S T E L L C O N S T E L L A T I O N N E W E N E R G Y 0 0 1 1 2 5 8 8 9 8 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - 4 2 1 P O P L A R D R I V E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 , 2 0 1 . 5 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 , 2 0 1 . 5 3 * 0 0 1 1 3 3 1 9 4 1 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 2 9 2 1 B R I S T O L R I D G E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 , 3 1 3 . 5 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 , 3 1 3 . 5 8 * 0 0 1 1 3 4 6 0 1 4 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 6 1 0 T O W E R L A N E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 5 , 2 9 2 . 9 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 , 2 9 2 . 9 7 * 0 0 1 1 3 6 1 0 4 6 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - 1 C O U N T R Y S I D E P K W Y 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 1 3 0 . 0 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 0 . 0 7 * 0 0 1 1 3 6 9 7 5 5 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - 4 2 0 F A I R H A V E N 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 6 1 2 . 5 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 1 2 . 5 2 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 2 , 5 5 0 . 6 7 5 1 6 1 3 0 D A C B E T T E R B U S I N E S S P L A N N I N G , I N C . 1 7 7 2 5 - S E P T . H R A 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - S E P T . H R A F E E S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 9 . 0 0 0 2 A D M I N - S E P T . E L E C T E D O F F I C I A L 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 5 1 2 . 0 0 0 3 H R A F E E S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 F I N A N C E - S E P T . H R A F E E S 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 . 0 0 0 5 P O L I C E - S E P T . H R A F E E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 6 0 . 0 0 8 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 9 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 3 0 D A C B E T T E R B U S I N E S S P L A N N I N G , I N C . 1 7 7 2 5 - S E P T . H R A 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 6 C O M M / D E V - S E P T . H R A F E E S 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 9 . 0 0 0 7 S T R E E T S - S E P T . H R A F E E S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 4 . 0 0 0 8 P A R K S - S E P T . H R A F E E S 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 0 . 5 0 0 9 R E C R E A T I O N - S E P T . H R A F E E S 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 0 . 5 0 1 0 W A T E R O P - S E P T . H R A F E E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 0 . 0 0 1 1 S E W E R O P - S E P T . H R A F E E S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 4 . 0 0 1 2 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - S E P T . R E T I R E E S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 4 0 1 5 . 0 0 1 3 H R A F E E S * * C O M M E N T * * 1 4 L I B R A R Y - S E P T . H R A F E E S 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 6 2 . 0 0 * 1 7 7 2 6 - S E P T . F S A 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - S E P T . F S A F E E S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 6 . 0 0 0 2 F I N A N C E - S E P T . F S A F E E S 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 6 . 0 0 0 3 P O L I C E - S E P T . F S A F E E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 2 1 . 0 0 0 4 C O M M / D E V - S E P T . F S A F E E S 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 . 0 0 0 5 S T R E E T S - S E P T . F S A F E E S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 . 0 0 0 6 P A R K S - S E P T . F S A F E E S 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 . 5 0 0 7 R E C R E A T I O N - S E P T . F S A F E E S 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 . 5 0 0 8 W A T E R O P - S E P T . F S A F E E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 . 0 0 0 9 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - S E P T . R E T I R E E S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 4 0 3 . 0 0 1 0 F S A F E E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 8 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 1 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 3 1 D A V E A U T O D A V I D L C H E L S E N 2 1 0 5 2 0 8 / 2 5 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - S Q U A D R E P A I R 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 3 5 9 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 5 9 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 5 9 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 3 2 E E I E N G I N E E R I N G E N T E R P R I S E S , I N C . 2 & 3 R E V I S E D 0 6 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 C W C A P I T A L - S A F E R O U T E S T O 2 3 - 2 3 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 9 2 1 , 2 5 4 . 9 8 9 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 0 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 3 2 E E I E N G I N E E R I N G E N T E R P R I S E S , I N C . 2 & 3 R E V I S E D 0 6 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 2 S C H O O L * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 2 5 4 . 9 8 * 5 2 6 2 7 0 5 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A I D P A R K I N G L O T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 0 9 2 1 . 0 0 0 2 I M P R O V E M E N T S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 2 1 . 0 0 * 5 2 9 2 3 0 7 / 2 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A I D P A R K I N G L O T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 0 8 7 1 . 5 0 0 2 I M P R O V E M E N T S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 7 1 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 , 0 4 7 . 4 8 5 1 6 1 3 3 E J E Q U I P E J E Q U I P M E N T 0 0 5 8 1 2 4 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - H O S E E N D W E L D M E N T 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 4 4 4 . 1 7 0 2 S T E E L , K A N A F L E X H O S E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 4 4 . 1 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 4 4 . 1 7 5 1 6 1 3 4 F L A T S O S R A Q U E L H E R R E R A 0 7 0 3 1 3 0 7 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - P L U G 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 2 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 . 0 0 * 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 / 1 0 / 1 2 0 1 S T R E E T S - T I R E S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 3 9 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 9 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 1 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 3 5 H D S U P P L Y H D S U P P L Y W A T E R W O R K S , L T D . B 1 9 1 2 6 0 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - S I N G L E P O R T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 6 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 0 . 0 0 * 10 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 1 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 3 5 H D S U P P L Y H D S U P P L Y W A T E R W O R K S , L T D . B 4 4 9 4 0 5 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - W I R E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 6 4 8 0 . 2 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 0 . 2 1 * B 4 5 7 3 0 6 0 9 / 0 9 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - M U L T I R E A D M O D U L E 8 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 6 4 1 3 5 . 3 9 0 2 C H A N N E L * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 5 . 3 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 1 5 . 6 0 5 1 6 1 3 6 H O M E D E P O H O M E D E P O T 1 0 1 3 7 6 7 0 8 / 2 1 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - D I S P L A C E M E N T W I R E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 0 . 3 7 0 2 C O N N E C T O R S , C H A S E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 . 3 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 . 3 7 5 1 6 1 3 7 H R G R E E N H R G R E E N 8 7 9 9 6 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - C A N N O N B A L L & 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 5 1 5 , 8 7 9 . 4 1 0 2 R T . 4 7 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 , 8 7 9 . 4 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 5 , 8 7 9 . 4 1 5 1 6 1 3 8 I L T R E A S U S T A T E O F I L L I N O I S T R E A S U R E R 1 3 0 9 / 1 5 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - R T . 4 7 E X P A N S I O N P Y M T # 1 3 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 9 1 0 , 1 5 8 . 3 3 0 2 W A T E R O P - R T . 4 7 E X P A N S I O N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 9 1 0 , 7 5 7 . 8 1 0 3 P Y M T # 1 3 * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 S E W E R O P - R T . 4 7 E X P A N S I O N 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 9 5 , 5 6 4 . 3 8 0 5 P Y M T # 1 3 * * C O M M E N T * * 0 6 D O W N T O W N T I F - R T . 4 7 E X P A N S I O N 8 8 - 8 8 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 9 1 , 6 6 6 . 6 7 0 7 P Y M T # 1 3 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 8 , 1 4 7 . 1 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 8 , 1 4 7 . 1 9 11 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 2 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 3 9 I L T R U C K I L L I N O I S T R U C K M A I N T E N A N C E , I N 0 2 6 4 0 8 0 8 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - P U L L & R E P A I R L E A K I N G 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 1 , 3 5 3 . 0 8 0 2 F U E L T A N K * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 3 5 3 . 0 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 3 5 3 . 0 8 5 1 6 1 4 0 I P R F I L L I N O I S P U B L I C R I S K F U N D 1 2 4 9 5 0 8 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - O C T O B E R W O R K E R S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 8 , 4 2 4 . 6 8 0 2 C O M P . I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - P A R K & R E C 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 1 , 7 5 2 . 4 7 0 4 O C T O B E R W O R K E R S C O M P . I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 W A T E R O P - O C T O B E R W O R K E R S C O M P . 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 1 , 0 0 4 . 0 1 0 6 I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 S E W E R O P - O C T O B E R W O R K E R S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 6 5 5 . 6 3 0 8 C O M P . I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 9 L I B R A R Y - O C T O B E R W O R K E R S C O M P . 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 1 , 1 5 9 . 2 1 1 0 I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 , 9 9 6 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 2 , 9 9 6 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 4 1 I T R O N I T R O N 2 9 9 3 3 7 0 8 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - H O S T I N G S E R V I C E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 4 7 4 . 4 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 7 4 . 4 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 7 4 . 4 8 5 1 6 1 4 2 J A Y M H E A P J A Y M . H E A P & A S S O C I A T E S , L T D 0 9 0 6 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - R O A D I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 3 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 N E G O T I A T I O N S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 12 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 3 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 4 3 J I F F Y J K E N T E R P R I S E S , I N C . 6 8 9 0 6 3 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - O I L C H N A G E , C A R W A S H 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 4 1 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 1 . 9 8 * 6 8 9 2 3 5 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - O I L C H A N G E , C A R W A S H , 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 7 4 . 6 7 0 2 T I R E R O T A T I O N * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 4 . 6 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 1 6 . 6 5 5 1 6 1 4 4 J I M S T R C K J A M E S G R I B B L E 1 4 7 1 7 1 0 7 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 1 7 2 0 7 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 6 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 1 9 8 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 1 9 9 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 2 0 0 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 3 3 6 0 7 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 3 3 7 0 7 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 6 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 3 3 8 0 7 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 6 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 0 3 . 0 0 13 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 4 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 4 5 J O H N S O I L J O H N S O N O I L C O M P A N Y I L N P 3 8 9 5 0 0 6 5 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 3 4 8 . 2 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 4 8 . 2 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 4 8 . 2 5 5 1 6 1 4 6 J U S T S A F E J U S T S A F E T Y , L T D 2 0 1 3 5 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - F I R S T A I D S U P P L I E S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 9 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 4 7 K C C O N C K E N D A L L C O U N T Y C O N C R E T E 3 2 0 0 6 0 8 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 L A N D C A S H - C O N C R E T E 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 6 4 6 . 2 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 4 6 . 2 5 * 3 2 0 2 4 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 L A N D C A S H - C O N C R E T E 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 1 , 6 4 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 6 4 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 , 2 9 1 . 2 5 5 1 6 1 4 8 K C R E C O R D K E N D A L L C O U N T Y R E C O R D 2 3 9 7 7 0 8 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 C O U N T R Y S I D E T I F - O R D I N A N C E 8 7 - 8 7 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 0 1 1 0 . 4 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 1 0 . 4 0 * 2 4 2 5 4 0 8 / 0 8 / 1 3 0 1 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - P R E S T W I C K 9 0 - 0 5 5 - 5 5 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 1 1 6 . 0 0 0 2 A M E N D M E N T T O A N N E X A T I O N * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M C H U G H 9 0 - 0 5 4 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 5 1 . 6 0 0 4 A N N E X A T I O N P U B L I C H E A R I N G * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 6 7 . 6 0 * 2 4 5 0 5 0 8 / 1 5 / 1 3 0 1 C O U N T R Y S I D E T I F - P U B L I C H E A R I N G 8 7 - 8 7 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 0 1 0 . 4 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 . 4 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 8 8 . 4 0 14 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 5 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 4 9 K E N P R I N T A N N E T T E M . P O W E L L 1 9 1 4 9 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - 5 0 0 B U S I N E S S C A R D S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 5 8 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 8 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 8 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 5 0 K E T C H M A M M A T T H E W K E T C H M A R K 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - F T O T R A I N I N G M E A L 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 2 0 . 6 4 0 2 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 . 6 4 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 0 . 6 4 5 1 6 1 5 1 L A F A R G E L A F A R G E A G G R E G A T E S I L L I N O I S 2 7 8 0 4 2 1 4 0 7 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - P E A G R A V E L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 2 2 7 . 3 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 2 7 . 3 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 2 7 . 3 3 5 1 6 1 5 2 M C K I R G N R A N D Y M C K I R G A N 7 5 3 7 8 0 8 / 1 4 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - B I O D I E S E L 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 1 , 1 0 7 . 7 0 0 2 W A T E R O P - B I O D I E S E L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 1 , 1 0 7 . 7 0 0 3 S E W E R O P - B I O D I E S E L 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 1 , 1 0 7 . 7 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 , 3 2 3 . 1 0 * 7 5 4 5 4 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - B I O D I E S E L 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 7 3 5 . 3 2 0 2 W A T E R O P - B I O D I E S E L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 7 3 5 . 3 2 0 3 S E W E R O P - B I O D I E S E L 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 7 3 5 . 3 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 2 0 5 . 9 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 , 5 2 9 . 0 6 5 1 6 1 5 3 M C O F F I C E M C G R A T H O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T , I N C . 15 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 6 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 5 3 M C O F F I C E M C G R A T H O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T , I N C . 1 0 2 7 5 3 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 1 9 5 . 5 6 0 2 F I N A N C E - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 1 5 6 . 4 4 0 3 C O M M / D E V - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 2 1 6 . 7 5 0 4 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 4 5 7 . 0 0 0 5 S T R E E T S - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 4 2 . 0 0 0 6 W A T E R O P - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 4 2 . 0 0 0 7 S E W E R O P - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 4 2 . 0 0 0 8 R E C R E A T I O N - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 3 1 0 . 1 3 0 9 P A R K S - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 7 8 . 1 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 * 1 0 2 7 5 4 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 3 5 3 . 3 5 0 2 F I N A N C E - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 1 1 7 . 7 8 0 3 C O M M / D E V - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 9 2 . 1 4 0 4 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 7 9 . 5 5 0 5 W A T E R O P - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 1 . 8 4 0 6 S E W E R O P - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 1 . 8 4 0 7 P A R K S - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 1 6 . 5 8 0 8 R E C R E A T I O N - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 2 4 9 . 5 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 1 2 . 6 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 , 4 5 2 . 6 0 5 1 6 1 5 4 M E N L A N D M E N A R D S - Y O R K V I L L E 3 9 8 5 6 0 8 / 1 4 / 1 3 0 1 L A N D C A S H - N A I L S 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 2 0 . 9 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 . 9 4 * 4 0 9 5 4 0 8 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - G L O V E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 1 3 . 9 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 . 9 5 * 4 0 9 6 2 0 8 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - G R E E N T A R P S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 6 . 9 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 . 9 9 * 4 1 6 2 0 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - A I R C R A F T B I T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 0 8 . 1 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 . 1 9 * 16 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 7 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 5 4 M E N L A N D M E N A R D S - Y O R K V I L L E 4 1 7 2 2 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - G O R I L L A T A P E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 8 . 4 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 . 4 7 * 4 2 2 7 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - L A G S C R E W S , B U S H I N G , 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 5 . 1 1 0 2 N I P P L E S , C O U P L I N G , B O L T S N A P S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 . 1 1 * 4 2 3 8 6 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - E Y E D R O P S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 1 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 . 9 8 * 4 2 4 3 1 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - B A T T E R I E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 3 2 3 . 9 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 3 . 9 4 * 4 2 5 1 8 - 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - F I X E D P O S T N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 3 . 9 6 0 2 P H O T O C O N T R O L * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 . 9 6 * 4 2 5 2 2 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - S T U D S , N A I L S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 5 7 . 0 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 7 . 0 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 7 0 . 5 9 5 1 6 1 5 5 M I D A M M I D A M E R I C A N W A T E R 8 4 6 2 3 A 0 5 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - M A N H O L E R I N G S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 * 8 4 8 5 2 A 0 5 / 1 6 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - P V C P I P E , W Y E 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 9 2 1 4 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 1 4 . 0 0 * 8 5 0 5 9 A 0 5 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - B O X E A S Y S T I C K S , 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 6 1 1 . 0 0 0 2 M A N H O L E R I N G S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 1 1 . 0 0 * 8 9 1 4 4 A 0 8 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C H E C K V A L V E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 6 4 1 , 4 6 4 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 4 6 4 . 0 0 * 17 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 8 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 5 5 M I D A M M I D A M E R I C A N W A T E R 9 6 8 3 6 A 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - C O N C R E T E R I N G 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 5 8 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 8 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 , 6 6 7 . 5 0 5 1 6 1 5 6 M I N E R M I N E R E L E C T R O N I C S C O R P O R A T I O N 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - P A S S E N G E R S I D E S W E E P 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 9 5 . 0 0 0 2 R E P A I R E D * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 * 2 5 1 0 0 1 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - R E P L A C E D S E L F C O N T A I N E D 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 9 5 . 0 0 0 2 S T R O B E L I G H T S W I T H L E D L I G H T S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A N D A D D E D F L A S H E R F O R L E D S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 9 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 5 7 N I C O R N I C O R G A S 0 0 - 4 1 - 2 2 - 8 7 4 8 4 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 1 0 7 P R A I R I E L A N E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 5 1 . 6 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 1 . 6 9 * 1 5 - 4 1 - 5 0 - 1 0 0 0 6 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 8 0 4 G A M E F A R M R D 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 9 4 . 4 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 4 . 4 4 * 1 5 - 6 3 - 7 4 - 5 7 3 3 2 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 9 5 5 B R I D G E S T R E E T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 2 . 8 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 2 . 8 8 * 1 5 - 6 4 - 6 1 - 3 5 3 2 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 9 9 1 C A N N O N B A L L T R A I L 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 0 . 1 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 0 . 1 1 * 2 0 - 5 2 - 5 6 - 2 0 4 2 1 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 4 2 0 F A I R H A V E N 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 7 6 . 2 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 6 . 2 5 * 18 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 9 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 5 7 N I C O R N I C O R G A S 2 3 - 4 5 - 9 1 - 4 8 6 2 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 0 1 B R U E L L S T R E E T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 8 4 . 5 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 4 . 5 6 * 3 1 - 6 1 - 6 7 - 2 4 9 3 1 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 2 7 6 W I N D H A M C I R C L E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 2 4 . 9 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 4 . 9 6 * 4 5 - 1 2 - 2 5 - 4 0 8 1 3 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 2 0 1 W H Y D R A U L I C S T R E E T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 5 . 1 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 5 . 1 3 * 4 6 - 6 9 - 4 7 - 6 7 2 7 1 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 9 7 5 B R I D G E S T R E E T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 7 8 . 2 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 8 . 2 8 * 4 9 - 2 5 - 6 1 - 1 0 0 0 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 V A N E M M O N R D 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 8 . 7 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 8 . 7 9 * 6 6 - 7 0 - 4 4 - 6 9 4 2 9 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 0 0 R A I N T R E E R D 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 9 2 . 4 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 2 . 4 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 3 9 . 5 6 5 1 6 1 5 8 O R R K K A T H L E E N F I E L D O R R & A S S O C . 1 4 1 0 9 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - M I S C E L L A N E O U S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 6 2 , 7 0 1 . 1 8 0 2 C I T Y L E G A L M A T T E R S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - G R A N D E R E S E R V E 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 6 1 , 6 9 1 . 0 0 0 4 M A T T E R S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - K E N D A L L M A R K E T 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 6 1 4 2 . 5 0 0 6 P L A C E M A T T E R S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - M E E T I N G S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 6 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - W I N D E T T R I D G E 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 6 2 , 8 4 0 . 5 0 0 9 M A T T E R S * * C O M M E N T * * 1 0 P A R K S - L E G A L M A T T E R S 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 6 1 4 2 . 5 0 1 1 C O U N T R Y S I D E T I F - L E G A L M A T T E R S 8 7 - 8 7 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 0 3 8 0 . 0 0 1 2 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - K E N D A L L 9 0 - 0 3 9 - 3 9 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 4 2 7 . 5 0 19 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 0 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 5 8 O R R K K A T H L E E N F I E L D O R R & A S S O C . 1 4 1 0 9 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 1 3 C R O S S I N G * * C O M M E N T * * 1 4 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - P R I O R I T Y 9 0 - 0 4 4 - 4 4 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 7 9 1 . 6 6 1 5 H E A L T H * * C O M M E N T * * 1 6 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M I D L A N D 9 0 - 0 4 6 - 4 6 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 3 0 8 . 7 5 1 7 B A N K * * C O M M E N T * * 1 8 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M C H U G H 9 0 - 0 5 4 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 2 3 7 . 5 0 1 9 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - P R E S T W I C K 9 0 - 0 5 5 - 5 5 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 1 , 5 2 7 . 9 1 2 0 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - R A I N T R E E 9 0 - 0 5 6 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 3 , 1 1 6 . 0 0 2 1 F O X H I L L S S A - O R D I N A N C E R E V I E W 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 6 1 9 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 , 4 9 7 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 5 , 4 9 7 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 5 9 O S W E G O V I L L A G E O F O S W E G O 2 0 1 3 0 3 4 6 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 D O W N T O W N T I F - C O M M U N I T Y 8 8 - 8 8 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 0 0 1 9 2 . 6 5 0 2 R E L A T I O N S F E E S O W E D F O R A M O Y * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 K A Y A K T R I P J U L Y 2 0 , 2 0 1 3 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 9 2 . 6 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 9 2 . 6 5 5 1 6 1 6 0 P A R A D I S E P A R A D I S E C A R W A S H 2 2 2 6 4 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C A R W A S H E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 9 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 6 1 R 0 0 0 0 7 9 6 R E O P R O P E R T Y C O N S U L T A N T S 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - R E F U N D O V E R P A Y M E N T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 1 8 6 . 8 1 0 2 F O R F I N A L B I L L F O R A C C O U N T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 # 0 1 0 7 4 6 3 6 2 0 - 0 1 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 8 6 . 8 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 8 6 . 8 1 20 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 1 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 6 2 R 0 0 0 0 7 9 7 B R E N D A K A Y L A U N I U S 0 9 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - B E E C H E R D E P O S I T R E F U N D 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 1 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 6 3 R 0 0 0 1 2 4 4 A N T O I N E T T E G R O G A N 0 8 2 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - R E F U N D E D T O W F E E 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 4 3 - 0 0 - 4 3 2 5 5 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 6 4 R 0 0 0 1 2 4 5 J O N I C H O U D H A R Y 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - R E F U N D O V E R P A Y M E N T O N 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 5 3 . 9 5 0 2 F I N A L B I L L F O R A C C O U N T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 # 0 1 0 7 3 4 4 2 5 0 - 0 1 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 3 . 9 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 3 . 9 5 5 1 6 1 6 5 R 0 0 0 1 2 4 6 K A Y G A Y L O R D 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - R E F U N D O F F I N A L P A Y M E N T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 5 9 . 9 5 0 2 O N F I N A L B I L L F O R A C C O U N T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 # 0 1 0 5 1 6 0 8 0 0 - 0 3 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 9 . 9 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 9 . 9 5 5 1 6 1 6 6 R O N W E S T R O N W E S T P H A L C H E V R O L E T 3 6 9 7 5 4 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 V E H I C L E & E Q U I P M E N T - R E P A I R 2 5 - 2 0 5 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 0 1 0 2 . 5 0 0 2 D R I V E R S S I D E P O W E R S E A T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 2 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 2 . 5 0 21 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 2 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 6 7 S C H O N S T E S C H O N S T E D T I N S T R U M E N T C O M P A N Y 0 0 1 1 8 0 8 9 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 5 2 C X R E P A I R 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 3 0 2 . 6 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 0 2 . 6 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 0 2 . 6 0 5 1 6 1 6 8 S P A R L I N G S P A R L I N G I N S T R U M E N T S , I N C . 5 5 0 7 3 0 1 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - F T 1 9 4 - 1 - 1 W I T H V 1 - V 2 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 6 9 6 . 5 5 0 2 C O N V E R S I O N K I T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 9 6 . 5 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 9 6 . 5 5 5 1 6 1 6 9 S P E E D W A Y S P E E D W A Y 1 0 0 1 5 4 2 4 3 8 - 0 9 1 3 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 P A R K S - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 1 , 3 2 1 . 1 8 0 2 R E C R E A T I O N - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 5 2 . 1 0 0 3 P O L I C E - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 5 , 6 0 3 . 3 4 0 4 W A T E R O P - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 6 7 8 . 5 1 0 5 S E W E R O P - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 6 7 8 . 5 1 0 6 S T R E E T S - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 6 7 8 . 5 1 0 7 C O M M / D E V - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 2 5 9 . 4 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 , 2 7 1 . 5 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 , 2 7 1 . 5 5 5 1 6 1 7 0 S T O N E F I R S T O N E F I R E R E S T A U R A N T 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - R E F U N D O V E R P A Y M E N T O N 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 5 5 . 7 5 0 2 F I N A L W A T E R B I L L * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 5 . 7 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 5 . 7 5 5 1 6 1 7 1 S U B U R B A N S U N - T I M E S M E D I A 22 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 3 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 7 1 S U B U R B A N S U N - T I M E S M E D I A 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 6 1 - C I T Y 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 C O M M / D E V - 2 0 1 3 R O A D W A Y P R O G R A M 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 6 3 2 0 . 5 3 0 2 S E W E R O P - S E W E R D E P T . O P E R A T O R 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 5 9 5 . 0 0 0 3 J O B P O S T I N G * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 1 5 . 5 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 1 5 . 5 3 5 1 6 1 7 2 T A P C O T A P C O I 4 2 4 7 3 1 0 6 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - S T R E E T S I G N S 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 9 6 6 . 7 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 6 . 7 4 * I 4 2 4 7 3 2 0 6 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - S T R E E T S I G N S 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 9 2 0 4 . 8 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 4 . 8 9 * I 4 2 4 7 3 3 0 6 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - C O R N E R B O L T S 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 9 8 4 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 4 . 0 0 * I 4 2 6 4 7 3 0 6 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - S T R E E T S I G N 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 9 1 3 1 . 9 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 1 . 9 4 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 8 7 . 5 7 5 1 6 1 7 3 T I G E R D I R T I G E R D I R E C T J 4 9 6 1 4 7 5 0 1 0 2 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - L A S E R J E T P R I N T E R , 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 1 6 4 . 6 6 0 2 T O N E R * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 6 4 . 6 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 6 4 . 6 6 5 1 6 1 7 4 V E R I Z O N V E R I Z O N W I R E L E S S 9 7 1 0 8 3 2 4 2 0 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 C O M M / D E V - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 2 7 . 6 1 23 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 4 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 7 4 V E R I Z O N V E R I Z O N W I R E L E S S 9 7 1 0 8 3 2 4 2 0 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 2 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 7 7 0 . 7 3 0 3 P A R K S - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 5 8 . 9 0 0 4 R E C R E A T I O N - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 4 7 . 8 5 0 5 W A T E R O P - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 3 2 . 3 8 0 6 S E W E R O P - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 8 0 . 7 6 0 7 S T R E E T S - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 4 3 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 7 6 2 . 2 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 7 6 2 . 2 1 5 1 6 1 7 5 V I T O S H C H R I S T I N E M . V I T O S H 1 5 6 4 0 8 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 C O M M / D E V - G R A N D E R E S E R V E 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 6 1 3 9 . 1 0 0 2 A M E N D E D A N N E X A T I O N & P U D * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A G R E E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 9 . 1 0 * 1 5 7 2 0 8 / 2 1 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - A U G . 2 8 A D M I N H E A R I N G 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 0 . 0 0 * 1 5 7 5 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - S E P T E M B E R 4 A D M I N 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 H E A R I N G * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 3 9 . 1 0 5 1 6 1 7 6 W A R E H O U S W A R E H O U S E D I R E C T 2 0 3 9 2 5 8 - 1 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - F O L D E R S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 7 9 . 9 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 9 . 9 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 9 . 9 0 5 1 6 1 7 7 W A T E R S Y S W A T E R S O L U T I O N S U N L I M I T E D , I N C 24 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 5 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 7 7 W A T E R S Y S W A T E R S O L U T I O N S U N L I M I T E D , I N C 3 3 6 2 4 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - W S U 1 1 0 B U L K 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 8 2 , 0 5 2 . 7 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 0 5 2 . 7 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 , 0 5 2 . 7 5 5 1 6 1 7 8 W E R D E R W W A L L Y W E R D E R I C H 0 9 0 5 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - A U G U S T 1 4 & 2 8 A D M I N 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 H E A R I N G S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 7 9 W T R P R D W A T E R P R O D U C T S , I N C . 0 2 4 2 9 6 4 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C U R B S T O P S , C A P S , 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 5 7 6 . 3 7 0 2 L U G S , G A S K E T S , T - B O L T S , B A N D * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 R E P A I R C L A M P S , C U R B B O X * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 7 6 . 3 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 7 6 . 3 7 5 1 6 1 8 0 Y B S D Y O R K V I L L E B R I S T O L 0 8 3 1 1 3 S F 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 E S C R O W - A U G U S T 2 0 1 3 S A N I T A R Y 9 5 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 5 0 3 0 1 , 7 8 6 . 3 5 0 2 F E E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 0 1 , 7 8 6 . 3 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 0 1 , 7 8 6 . 3 5 5 1 6 1 8 1 Y O R K A C E Y O R K V I L L E A C E & R A D I O S H A C K 1 4 9 9 0 1 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 C O M M / D E V - T A I L L I G H T 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 3 . 4 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 . 4 9 * 25 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 6 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 8 1 Y O R K A C E Y O R K V I L L E A C E & R A D I O S H A C K 1 4 9 9 3 0 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C E M E N T P V C , C O R E D 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 9 . 4 8 0 2 P L U G * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 . 4 8 * 1 4 9 9 3 7 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - W A S H B R U S H , R A I N X , 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 5 3 . 2 3 0 2 G L A S S C L E A N E R , T I R E P R O T E C T A N T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 M I C R O F I B E R C L O T H * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 3 . 2 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 6 . 2 0 5 1 6 1 8 2 Y O R K N A P A Y O R K V I L L E N A P A A U T O P A R T S 0 5 0 2 0 6 0 8 / 1 6 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - O I L F I L T E R 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 5 . 1 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 . 1 1 * 0 5 0 5 6 6 0 8 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - B U L B 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 3 . 7 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 . 7 7 * 0 5 0 6 4 3 0 8 / 2 1 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - O I L D R I 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 3 8 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 8 . 0 0 * 0 5 0 7 5 3 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C I R C U I T T E S T E R S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 1 8 . 6 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 8 . 6 6 * 0 5 0 7 7 2 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C O N N E C T O R 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 1 0 . 3 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 . 3 9 * 0 5 1 4 0 9 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - S P L A S H G U A R D 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 1 8 . 4 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 8 . 4 9 * 0 5 1 4 1 2 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - M U D F L A P S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 5 4 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 4 . 9 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 4 9 . 4 0 26 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 7 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 8 3 Y O R K P D P C Y O R K V I L L E P O L I C E D E P T . 0 9 0 3 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - W A T E R & I C E F O R 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 5 0 3 2 . 0 0 0 2 H O M E T O W N D A Y S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A D M I N - R E F U N D O F O V E R P A Y M E N T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 0 2 . 0 0 0 4 O N F I N E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 4 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 4 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 8 4 Y O U N G M M A R L Y S J . Y O U N G 0 8 1 4 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M I D L A N D S T A T E 9 0 - 0 4 6 - 4 6 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 7 . 8 7 0 2 B A N K S P E C I A L U S E P E R M I T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M C H U G H 9 0 - 0 5 4 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 7 . 8 7 0 4 R E Z O N I N G * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - P R E S T W I C K 9 0 - 0 5 5 - 5 5 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 7 . 8 7 0 6 F I N A L P L A T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 A D M I N - A U G U S T 1 4 P L A N 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 2 . 6 4 0 8 C O M M I S S I O N M E E T I N G M I N U T E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 . 2 5 * 0 8 2 0 1 3 0 9 / 0 8 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A U G U S T 2 0 P W C O M M I T T E E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 1 9 . 5 0 0 2 M E E T I N G M I N U T E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 9 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 5 . 7 5 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 6 5 3 , 0 1 3 . 2 4 27 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 6 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 2 : 0 9 : 2 3 M A N U A L C H E C K R E G I S T E R ID : A P 2 2 5 0 0 0 . C B L CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I T E M C H E C K I N V O I C E # D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N D A T E A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 1 0 1 6 K C R K E N D A L L C O U N T Y R E C O R D E R ' S 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 1 6 6 8 6 9 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M I D L A N D 9 0 - 0 4 6 - 4 6 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 5 1 . 0 0 0 2 S T A T E B A N K S P E C I A L U S E * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 W A T E R O P - R E L E A S E W A T E R L I E N S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 9 8 . 0 0 0 4 V E H I C L E & E Q U I P M E N T - M O W I N G 2 5 - 2 1 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 1 9 6 . 0 0 0 5 L I E N S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 4 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 4 5 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 3 4 5 . 0 0 28 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 0 : 1 8 : 4 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 0 6 R 0 0 0 1 2 2 7 I R E N E & W A Y N E K A U F F M A N 2 0 1 3 0 1 5 3 - B U I L D 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 M U N I C I P A L B L D G - 2 4 3 8 S A G E C T 1 6 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 B U I L D P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 V E H I C L E & E Q U I P M E N T - 2 4 3 8 S A G E 2 5 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 2 4 4 5 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 4 C T . B U I L D P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 C W C A P I T A L - 2 4 3 8 S A G E C T B U I L D 2 3 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 5 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 0 6 P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 W A T E R O P - 2 4 3 8 S A G E C T . B U I L D 5 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 2 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 8 P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 29 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 6 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 1 : 0 4 : 0 8 M A N U A L C H E C K R E G I S T E R ID : A P 2 2 5 0 0 0 . C B L CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I T E M C H E C K I N V O I C E # D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N D A T E A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 1 0 1 7 K C R K E N D A L L C O U N T Y R E C O R D E R ' S 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 1 6 7 0 8 3 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 0 1 R E L E A S E O F M O W I N G L I E N 2 5 - 2 1 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 4 9 . 0 0 0 2 R E L E A S E O F W A T E R L I E N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 4 9 . 0 0 0 3 M O W I N G L I E N S F I L E D 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 1 4 7 . 0 0 0 4 F I L I N G O F M O W I N G L I E N S 2 5 - 2 1 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 9 9 . 0 0 0 5 S A T I S F A C T I O N O F T A X L I E N S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 9 8 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 4 2 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 4 2 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 4 4 2 . 0 0 30 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 7 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 3 : 1 4 : 5 6 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 1 7 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 0 7 L A W R E N K L A W R E N T Z , K E V I N 0 9 1 6 1 3 0 9 / 1 6 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - I P W A C O N F E R E N C E M E A L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 4 0 . 0 1 0 2 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 W A T E R O P - C O N F E R E N C E G A S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 2 0 . 0 0 0 4 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 0 . 0 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 0 . 0 1 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 6 0 . 0 1 31 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 0 8 : 1 3 : 1 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 0 8 R 0 0 0 1 2 2 8 L I N D L E D A I L E Y 2 0 1 3 0 1 5 2 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 M U N I C I P A L B L D G - 2 1 4 1 P R A I R I E 1 6 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 G R A S S L A N E B U I L D P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 V E H I C L E & E Q U I P M E N T - 2 1 4 1 2 5 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 2 4 4 5 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 4 P R A I R I E G R A S S L A N E B U I L D L A N E * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 C W C A P I T A L - 2 1 4 1 P R A I R I E G R A S S 2 3 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 5 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 0 6 G R A S S L A N E B U I L D P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 W A T E R O P - 2 1 4 1 P R A I R I E G R A S S 5 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 2 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 8 L A N E B U I L D P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 32 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS ADMINISTRATION 12,112.06$ 243.75$ 12,355.81$ 1,325.78$ 872.62$ 14,554.21$ FINANCE 7,271.26 - 7,271.26 812.39 556.02 8,639.67 POLICE 83,509.71 8,276.43 91,786.14 481.95 6,774.03 99,042.12 COMMUNITY DEV.7,849.87 - 7,849.87 795.40 569.28 9,214.55 STREETS 11,384.55 - 11,384.55 1,221.57 837.70 13,443.82 WATER 12,064.03 534.22 12,598.25 1,351.79 916.79 14,866.83 SEWER 6,216.83 - 6,216.83 667.07 468.65 7,352.55 PARKS 17,905.91 - 17,905.91 1,873.60 1,331.23 21,110.74 RECREATION 11,506.79 - 11,506.79 1,036.49 841.02 13,384.30 LIBRARY 15,758.89 - 15,758.89 1,003.61 1,174.96 17,937.46 TOTALS 185,579.90$ 9,054.40$ 194,634.30$ 10,569.65$ 14,342.30$ 219,546.25$ TOTAL PAYROLL 219,546.25$ UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY September 13, 2013 33 DATE BI-WEEKLY 9/13/2013 $219,546.25 $219,546.25 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLERK'S MANUAL CHECK - #131016- KENDALL COUNTY RECORDER 9/6/2013 $345.00 MANUAL CHECK - #516106 - KAUFFMAN BUILD CHECK 9/12/2013 $10,000.00 CLERK'S MANUAL CHECK - #131017- KENDALL COUNTY RECORDER 9/16/2013 $442.00 MANUAL CHECK - #516107 -KEVIN LAWRENTZ- REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES 9/17/2013 $60.01 MANUAL CHECK - #516108 -DAILEY BUILD CHECK 9/18/2013 $10,000.00 BILLS LIST 9/24/2013 $653,013.24 $673,860.25 $893,406.50 TOTAL BILLS PAID TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL BILL LIST SUMMARY Tuesday, September 24, 2013 PAYROLL TOTAL PAYROLL 34 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 8 9 A A C V B A U R O R A A R E A C O N V E N T I O N 0 8 3 1 1 3 - A L L 0 9 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 A L L S E A S O N S A U G U S T 2 0 1 3 T A X 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 1 4 9 . 6 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 9 . 6 1 * 0 8 3 1 1 3 - H A M P T O N 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 H A M P T O N I N N A U G U S T 2 0 1 3 T A X 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 1 4 , 1 7 0 . 4 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 , 1 7 0 . 4 9 * 0 8 3 1 1 3 - S U P E R 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 S U P E R 8 A U G U S T 2 0 1 3 T A X 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 1 1 , 3 3 9 . 1 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 3 3 9 . 1 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 , 5 5 9 . 2 7 5 1 6 1 9 0 A C C U R I N T L E X I S N E X I S R I S K D A T A M G M T . 1 2 4 9 3 0 4 - 2 0 1 3 0 8 3 1 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 A U G U S T S E A R C H E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 5 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 9 1 A C T I O N A C T I O N G R A P H I X L T D 5 0 8 1 0 6 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 S I G N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 3 2 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 2 . 0 0 * 5 1 3 0 0 7 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 B A N N E R S , S T A K E S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 1 0 5 . 6 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 5 . 6 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 3 7 . 6 8 5 1 6 1 9 2 A D V A A U T O A D V A N C E D A U T O M A T I O N & C O N T R O L S 1 3 - 1 9 3 8 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 I N T R U S I O N A L A R M I N T E G R A T I O N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 5 3 , 5 6 8 . 5 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 , 5 6 8 . 5 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 , 5 6 8 . 5 5 pg. 1 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 9 3 A M P E R A G E A M P E R A G E E L E C T R I C A L S U P P L Y I N C 0 4 7 8 8 8 8 - I N 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 E L E C T R O N I C B A L L A S T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 3 1 . 8 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 1 . 8 4 * 0 4 7 8 9 0 5 - I N 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 L A M P S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 7 8 . 2 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 7 8 . 2 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 1 0 . 0 4 5 1 6 1 9 4 A R A M A R K A R A M A R K U N I F O R M S E R V I C E S 6 1 0 - 8 2 0 0 8 9 5 0 9 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 U N I F O R M S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 0 2 U N I F O R M S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 0 3 U N I F O R M S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 0 . 5 0 * 6 1 0 - 8 2 1 0 0 4 6 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 U N I F O R M S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 3 2 . 7 7 0 2 U N I F O R M S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 3 2 . 7 8 0 3 U N I F O R M S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 3 2 . 7 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 8 . 3 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 6 8 . 8 3 5 1 6 1 9 5 A T L A S A T L A S B O B C A T B 2 1 2 9 9 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 F I L T E R S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 2 7 1 . 3 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 7 1 . 3 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 7 1 . 3 9 5 1 6 1 9 6 A T T A T & T 5 9 9 9 3 3 2 2 0 9 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T . 1 0 - O C T . 0 3 R O U T E R S E R V I C E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 4 6 6 . 1 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 6 6 . 1 2 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 6 6 . 1 2 pg. 2 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 3 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 9 7 A U T O S P A U T O M O T I V E S P E C I A L T I E S , I N C . 1 9 4 9 3 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 R E P L A C E U - J O I N T S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 0 2 . 9 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 2 . 9 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 0 2 . 9 9 5 1 6 1 9 8 B E H R D D A V I D B E H R E N S 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T E M E B E R 2 0 1 3 M O B I L E E M A I L 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 4 5 . 0 0 0 2 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 5 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 9 9 B P A M O C O B P A M O C O O I L C O M P A N Y 3 9 1 8 6 7 2 3 - P D 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T E M B E R G A S O L I N E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 2 5 7 . 7 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 7 . 7 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 5 7 . 7 8 5 1 6 2 0 0 B R A N D T B U B R A N D T B U I L D E R S , I N C . E S T # 1 0 9 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 B R I S T O L A V E . W A T E R M A I N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 2 5 1 0 4 , 1 1 1 . 1 0 0 2 I M P R O V E M E N T S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 4 , 1 1 1 . 1 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 4 , 1 1 1 . 1 0 5 1 6 2 0 1 B U I L D E R S B U I L D E R S A S P H A L T L L C 1 0 5 0 3 0 9 / 0 9 / 1 3 0 1 B R O K E N A S P H A L T 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 4 4 2 5 . 6 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 2 5 . 6 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 2 5 . 6 3 pg. 3 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 4 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 0 2 C A R D I S C A R R O L L D I S T R I B U T I N G 3 6 2 7 9 5 0 9 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 H O T R O L L S T A K E S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 1 5 6 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 6 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 5 6 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 0 3 C A R G I L L C A R G I L L , I N C 2 9 0 1 3 0 9 7 1 1 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 B U L K R O C K S A L T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 2 , 7 0 2 . 8 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 7 0 2 . 8 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 , 7 0 2 . 8 5 5 1 6 2 0 4 C L A S G R A P C L A S S I C G R A P H I C I N D U S T R I E S , I N C 7 2 9 2 2 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 W - 2 F O R M S & E N V E L O P E S 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 9 1 . 1 8 0 2 1 0 9 9 R F O R M S & E N V E L O P E S 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 5 - 0 0 - 1 5 8 6 1 2 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 3 . 6 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 3 . 6 8 5 1 6 2 0 5 C O M E D C O M M O N W E A L T H E D I S O N 6 9 6 3 0 1 9 0 2 1 - 0 9 1 3 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 0 1 0 8 / 1 4 - 0 9 / 1 3 S T . L I G H T S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 1 4 . 9 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 4 . 9 7 * 7 0 9 0 0 3 9 0 0 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 9 / 1 3 0 1 0 8 / 0 8 - 0 9 / 0 9 S T . L I G H T S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 1 8 . 1 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 8 . 1 0 * 8 3 4 4 0 1 0 0 2 6 - 0 9 1 3 0 9 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 0 8 / 1 4 - 0 9 / 1 3 S T . L I G H T S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 2 4 5 . 1 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 4 5 . 1 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 7 8 . 2 5 5 1 6 2 0 6 C O N S T E L L C O N S T E L L A T I O N N E W E N E R G Y pg. 4 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 5 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 0 6 C O N S T E L L C O N S T E L L A T I O N N E W E N E R G Y 0 0 1 1 6 0 1 0 4 0 0 9 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 0 8 / 1 6 - 0 9 / 1 7 3 2 9 9 L E H M A N C R O S S . 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 4 , 3 6 6 . 8 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 , 3 6 6 . 8 4 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 , 3 6 6 . 8 4 5 1 6 2 0 7 D E K A N E D E K A N E E Q U I P M E N T C O R P . I A 2 2 0 2 9 0 8 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 B L A D E S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 0 5 2 . 3 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 2 . 3 2 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 2 . 3 2 5 1 6 2 0 8 D U T E K T H O M A S & J U L I E F L E T C H E R 3 1 6 8 6 9 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 0 1 H O S E A S S E M B L Y , B U S H I N G 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 1 2 3 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 3 . 0 0 * 6 9 2 1 0 5 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 H O S E R E P A I R 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 3 8 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 0 9 E J E Q U I P E J E Q U I P M E N T 0 0 5 8 4 9 3 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 M A N I F O L D R I N G , A D A P T E R S , B A L L 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 7 3 1 . 0 5 0 2 V A L V E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 3 1 . 0 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 3 1 . 0 5 5 1 6 2 1 0 E Y E M E D F I D E L I T Y S E C U R I T Y L I F E I N S . 6 2 3 7 6 5 4 0 9 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 V I S I O N I N S . 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 4 4 9 . 1 9 0 2 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 E L E C T E D O F F I C I A L 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 8 4 5 . 0 6 pg. 5 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 6 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 1 0 E Y E M E D F I D E L I T Y S E C U R I T Y L I F E I N S . 6 2 3 7 6 5 4 0 9 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 3 V I S I O N I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 V I S I O N I N S . 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 4 2 6 . 9 8 0 5 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 V I S I O N I N S . 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 4 3 1 5 . 5 2 0 6 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 V I S I O N I N S . 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 4 3 1 . 5 7 0 7 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 V I S I O N I N S . 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 4 5 8 . 5 5 0 8 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 R E T I R E E S V I S I O N 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 4 2 4 8 . 1 9 0 9 I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 1 0 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 V I S I O N I N S . 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 4 8 3 . 4 7 1 1 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 V I S I O N I N S . 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 4 4 2 . 2 7 1 2 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 V I S I O N I N S . 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 4 6 2 . 3 2 1 3 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 V I S I O N I N S . 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 4 1 7 . 9 0 1 4 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 V I S I O N I N S . 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 4 5 3 . 6 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 3 4 . 6 2 * C H E C K T O T A L : 8 3 4 . 6 2 5 1 6 2 1 1 F L A T S O S R A Q U E L H E R R E R A 0 9 2 4 1 3 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 T I R E S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 1 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 1 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 1 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 1 2 F R E D R I C R R O B F R E D R I C K S O N 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 3 M O B I L E E M A I L 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 4 5 . 0 0 0 2 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 5 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 1 3 F U L T O N F U L T O N T E C H N O L O G I E S U - 2 0 1 3 0 7 9 7 0 9 / 0 9 / 1 3 0 1 R E P A I R E D R T U C O M M . F A I L U R E 2 5 - 2 0 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 7 2 4 . 6 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 2 4 . 6 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 2 4 . 6 1 pg. 6 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 7 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 1 4 G A R D K O C H G A R D I N E R K O C H & W E I S B E R G H - 2 3 6 4 C - 9 4 6 0 6 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 K I M B A L L H I L L M A T T E R S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 1 1 0 , 2 1 9 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 , 2 1 9 . 0 0 * H - 2 9 3 2 C - 9 3 9 3 7 0 8 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 W I N D E T T R I D G E M A T T E R S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 1 8 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 0 . 0 0 * H - 3 0 5 5 C - 9 4 5 8 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 I C C I M A T T E R S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 1 2 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 0 6 0 . 0 0 * H - 3 1 0 6 C - 9 4 6 0 8 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 T R A V E L E R S I N S U R A N C E M A T T E R S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 1 2 , 4 1 7 . 6 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 4 1 7 . 6 2 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 4 , 7 7 6 . 6 2 5 1 6 2 1 5 G L A T F E L T G L A T F E L T E R P U B L I C P R A C T I C E 1 0 6 9 7 1 0 4 0 8 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D D E D 3 L E V E H S # 7 6 5 8 , 2 4 4 8 , 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 7 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 2 ; D E L E T E D 9 4 C H E V Y # 8 6 8 9 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 0 0 . 0 0 * 6 6 0 2 1 0 4 0 8 / 0 2 / 1 3 0 1 D E L E T E D 0 2 C H E V Y T R K V I N # 5 5 3 9 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 - 2 4 8 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : - 2 4 8 . 0 0 * 7 4 9 7 4 1 0 2 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 L I A B I L I T Y I N S . I N S T A L L M E N T # 1 0 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 6 , 0 1 3 . 1 8 0 2 P & R L I A B I L I T Y I N S . I N S T A L L # 1 0 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 1 , 2 5 0 . 8 4 0 4 L I A B I L I T Y I N S . I N S T A L L M E N T # 1 0 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 7 1 6 . 6 2 0 5 L I A B I L I T Y I N S . I N S T A L L M E N T # 1 0 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 4 6 7 . 9 6 0 6 L I A B I L I T Y I N S . I N S T A L L M E N T # 1 0 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 8 2 7 . 4 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 , 2 7 6 . 0 0 * 8 4 0 0 1 0 4 0 8 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 D E L E T E D 2 0 1 1 H A R L E Y D A V I D S O N 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 - 4 1 7 . 0 0 0 2 M O T O R C Y C L E V I N # 6 0 3 0 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : - 4 1 7 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 , 3 1 1 . 0 0 pg. 7 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 8 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 1 6 G O L I N S K I G A R Y G O L I N S K I 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 3 M O B I L E E M A I L 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 4 5 . 0 0 0 2 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 5 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 1 7 G U A R D E N T G U A R D I A N 0 9 2 3 1 3 - D E N T A L 0 9 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 D E N T A L I N S . 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 3 3 9 4 . 4 6 0 2 O C T . 2 0 1 3 E / O D E N T A L I N S . 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 7 3 6 4 . 5 1 0 4 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 D E N T A L I N S . 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 3 2 3 5 . 0 7 0 5 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 D E N T A L I N S . 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 3 2 , 5 5 1 . 5 1 0 6 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 D E N T A L I N S . 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 3 2 5 2 . 9 7 0 7 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 D E N T A L I N S . 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 3 5 0 3 . 2 5 0 8 O C T . 2 0 1 3 R E T I R E E S D E N T A L I N S . 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 4 1 3 2 9 . 0 9 1 0 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 D E N T A L I N S . 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 3 5 5 2 . 0 0 1 1 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 D E N T A L I N S . 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 3 2 5 5 . 5 4 1 2 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 D E N T A L I N S . 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 3 4 5 9 . 6 8 1 3 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 D E N T A L I N S . 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 3 1 1 6 . 9 3 1 4 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 D E N T A L I N S . 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 3 4 2 4 . 3 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 , 4 3 9 . 3 5 * 0 9 2 3 1 3 - L I F E 0 9 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 L I F E I N S . 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 2 5 8 . 5 2 0 2 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 E / O L I F E I N S . 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 6 5 3 . 1 5 0 4 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 L I F E I N S . 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 2 2 7 . 6 9 0 5 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 L I F E I N S . 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 2 4 1 3 . 2 7 0 6 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 L I F E I N S . 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 2 5 2 . 5 0 0 7 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 L I F E I N S . 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 2 1 0 4 . 6 0 0 8 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 L I F E I N S . 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 2 7 1 . 1 5 0 9 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 L I F E I N S . 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 2 4 5 . 0 3 1 0 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 L I F E I N S . 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 2 6 8 . 7 0 1 1 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 L I F E I N S . 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 2 1 9 . 3 1 1 2 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 3 L I F E I N S . 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 2 2 8 2 . 2 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 9 6 . 1 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 , 4 3 5 . 5 1 pg. 8 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 9 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 1 8 H D S U P P L Y H D S U P P L Y W A T E R W O R K S , L T D . B 4 7 2 4 9 3 0 9 / 1 6 / 1 3 0 1 1 0 0 C F M E T E R , M E T E R F L A G S E T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 8 1 , 4 3 9 . 3 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 4 3 9 . 3 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 4 3 9 . 3 1 5 1 6 2 1 9 H O M E D E P O H O M E D E P O T 1 0 9 3 9 2 9 0 8 / 2 1 / 1 3 0 1 R E T U R N E D M E R C H A N D I S E C R E D I T 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 - 8 . 5 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : - 8 . 5 5 * 2 0 1 1 4 6 8 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 T O I L E T T A N K L E V E R , D O O R S T O P 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 8 4 0 . 8 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 0 . 8 1 * 8 0 1 5 0 1 7 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 B R A S S P I P E P L U G S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 5 . 8 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 . 8 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 8 . 1 5 5 1 6 2 2 0 H U N T E R J J O H N H U N T E R 0 9 2 0 1 3 0 9 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 H O M I C I D E C L A S S M E A L 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 4 2 . 7 7 0 2 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 2 . 7 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 2 . 7 7 5 1 6 2 2 1 I L P D 4 7 7 8 I L L I N O I S S T A T E P O L I C E 0 9 1 2 1 3 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 L I Q U O R L I C E N S E B A C K G R O U N D 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 3 1 . 5 0 0 2 C H E C K * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 1 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 1 . 5 0 5 1 6 2 2 2 I P R F I L L I N O I S P U B L I C R I S K F U N D pg. 9 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 0 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 2 2 I P R F I L L I N O I S P U B L I C R I S K F U N D 1 2 4 9 6 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 0 1 N O V E M B E R W O R K E R S C O M P . I N S . 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 8 , 4 2 4 . 6 8 0 2 N O V E M B E R P A R K / R E C W O R K E R S . 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 1 , 7 5 2 . 4 7 0 3 C O M P . I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 N O V E M B E R W O R K E R S C O M P . I N S . 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 1 , 0 0 4 . 0 1 0 5 N O V E M B E R W O R K E R S C O M P . I N S . 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 6 5 5 . 6 3 0 6 N O V E M B E R W O R K E R S C O M P . I N S . 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 1 , 1 5 9 . 2 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 , 9 9 6 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 2 , 9 9 6 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 2 3 I T R O N I T R O N 3 0 3 1 5 1 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 O C T O B E R H O S T I N G S E R V I C E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 4 7 4 . 4 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 7 4 . 4 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 7 4 . 4 8 5 1 6 2 2 4 J E W E L J E W E L 0 9 1 8 1 3 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 K L E E N E X , P A P E R T O W E L S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 1 9 . 9 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 9 . 9 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 9 . 9 9 5 1 6 2 2 5 J I M S T R C K J A M E S G R I B B L E 1 4 7 8 8 0 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 6 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 6 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 2 6 J R S T E I N J O H N R . S T E I N H O F F 0 9 2 5 1 3 0 9 / 2 5 / 1 3 0 1 I N S T A L L F T 1 9 4 C O N V E R S I O N K I T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 5 1 4 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 4 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 4 0 . 0 0 pg. 10 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 1 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 2 7 J S H O E S J E F F R E Y L . J E R A B E K 3 7 6 1 - 1 1 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 B O O T S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 1 6 7 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 6 7 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 6 7 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 2 8 J U S T S A F E J U S T S A F E T Y , L T D 1 9 8 5 6 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 F I R S T A I D S U P P L I E S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 2 9 . 4 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 9 . 4 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 9 . 4 5 5 1 6 2 2 9 K C C O N C K E N D A L L C O U N T Y C O N C R E T E 3 2 0 4 1 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 C O N C R E T E 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 9 5 2 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 2 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 5 2 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 3 0 K C S H E R I F K E N D A L L C O . S H E R I F F ' S O F F I C E 0 9 1 8 / 0 9 2 3 0 9 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 K A N E C O F T A B O N D F E E F R O M 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 1 2 2 1 0 . 0 0 0 2 0 9 / 1 8 & K E N D A L L C O F T A B O N D * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 F E E F R O M 0 9 / 2 4 R E I M B U R S M E N T S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 1 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 1 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 3 1 L A W S O N L A W S O N P R O D U C T S 9 3 0 1 8 9 7 2 8 6 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 H E X N U T S , H E X C A P S , S C R E W S , 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 4 8 4 . 6 7 0 2 Q U I K S L I D E S , H A I R P I N S , H E A T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 S E A L R I N G S , C A B L E T I E S , L I N C H * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 P I N S , W A S H E R S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 8 4 . 6 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 8 4 . 6 7 pg. 11 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 2 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 3 2 M A R I N E B I A R C H C H E M I C A L S , I N C 5 2 1 2 3 2 1 9 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 A U G U S T P O N D T R E A T M E N T 1 2 - 1 1 2 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 8 1 2 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 1 2 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 8 1 2 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 3 3 M E N L A N D M E N A R D S - Y O R K V I L L E 4 2 6 2 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 R U B B E R E X P A N S I O N J O I N T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 2 . 0 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 . 0 5 * 4 3 2 4 5 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 H O O K C L E V I S G R A B 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 1 4 . 9 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 4 . 9 7 * 4 3 3 0 3 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 M O T O R M I X , U L T R A G R A Y 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 1 5 . 0 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 . 0 6 * 4 3 4 1 4 - 1 3 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 B A T T E R I E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 3 2 3 . 9 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 3 . 9 4 * 4 4 1 0 7 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 S O C K E T S E T S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 0 2 3 . 9 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 3 . 9 7 * 4 4 1 1 3 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 S O C K E T S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 0 1 5 . 6 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 . 6 8 * 4 4 1 8 1 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 R E S P I R A T O R F I L T E R S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 7 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 . 9 8 * 4 4 1 8 8 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 S P L A S H , A I R H O S E R E E L 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 4 7 . 8 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 7 . 8 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 6 1 . 4 6 5 1 6 2 3 4 M E R L I N D E Y C O , I N C . pg. 12 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 3 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 3 4 M E R L I N D E Y C O , I N C . 2 5 6 5 3 0 9 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 T I R E P L U G 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 1 4 . 1 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 4 . 1 4 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 4 . 1 4 5 1 6 2 3 5 M I K O L A S R R A Y M I K O L A S E K 0 9 1 9 1 3 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 L E A D H O M I C I D E I N V E S T I G A T O R 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 4 4 . 5 9 0 2 T R A I N I N G M E A L R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 4 . 5 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 4 . 5 9 5 1 6 2 3 6 M I N E R M I N E R E L E C T R O N I C S C O R P O R A T I O N 2 5 1 1 4 7 0 9 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 R E P A I R E D I N T E R M I T T E N T L Y C O I L 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 9 5 . 0 0 0 2 C O R D O N M I C * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 * 2 5 1 1 4 8 0 9 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 C H E C K O U T S W E E P L I G H T 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 9 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 9 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 3 7 N A R V I C K N A R V I C K B R O S . L U M B E R C O , I N C 4 6 2 7 0 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 S M A L L L O A D O F C O N C R E T E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 4 7 2 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 7 2 . 0 0 * 4 6 2 7 1 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 S M A L L L O A D O F C O N C R E T E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 4 7 8 . 3 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 7 8 . 3 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 5 0 . 3 8 5 1 6 2 3 8 N E M R T N O R T H E A S T M U L T I - R E G I O N A L pg. 13 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 4 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 3 8 N E M R T N O R T H E A S T M U L T I - R E G I O N A L 1 7 2 7 4 1 0 9 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 A D V A N C E D I N T E R V I E W S A N D 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 2 1 2 5 . 0 0 0 2 I N T E R R O G A T I O N S T R A I N I N G * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 2 5 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 3 9 N E O U S A N E O P O S T U S A I N C 1 4 0 4 4 9 3 3 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 P O S T A G E M A C H I N E I N K C A R T R I D G E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 6 3 . 9 9 0 2 P O S T A G E M A C H I N E I N K C A R T R I D G E 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 6 4 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 7 . 9 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 2 7 . 9 9 5 1 6 2 4 0 N I C O R N I C O R G A S 6 1 - 6 0 - 4 1 - 1 0 0 0 9 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 6 1 0 T O W E R L N . A U G . S E R V I C E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 4 2 . 0 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 2 . 0 2 * 8 3 - 8 0 - 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 7 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 6 1 0 T O W E R L N . # B A U G . S E R V I C E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 2 9 . 9 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 9 . 9 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 1 . 9 5 5 1 6 2 4 1 O L S O N B B A R T O L S O N 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 I C M A C O N F E R E N C E T A X I 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 7 4 . 0 0 0 2 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 4 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 4 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 4 2 O S W E G O V I L L A G E O F O S W E G O 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T . 2 0 1 3 P A R K & R I D E P R O C E E D S 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 6 0 7 7 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 7 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 7 . 5 0 pg. 14 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 5 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 4 3 P I C K E R I L L I S A P I C K E R I N G 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 M I L E A G E A N D M E A L R E I M B U R S E M E N T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 2 4 6 . 4 0 0 2 F O R A T T E N D A N C E A T M U N I C I P A L * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 C L E R K S O F I L I L I N O I S I N S T I T U T E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 4 6 . 4 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 4 6 . 4 0 5 1 6 2 4 4 R 0 0 0 0 4 7 4 N E I L B O R N E M A N 0 9 1 9 1 3 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 R E F U N D L I B R A R Y A N D C I T Y 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 1 1 , 3 6 8 . 3 8 0 2 P O R T I O N O F T A X E S P E R O R D I N A N C E * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 2 0 0 6 - 1 0 5 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 3 6 8 . 3 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 3 6 8 . 3 8 5 1 6 2 4 5 R 0 0 0 0 5 9 4 B R I A N B E T Z W I S E R 1 0 0 1 3 - 5 9 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 1 8 5 W O L F S T . P R I N C I P A L P Y M T # 5 9 2 5 - 2 1 5 - 9 2 - 0 0 - 8 0 0 0 2 , 5 7 9 . 4 8 0 2 1 8 5 W O L F S T . I N T E R E S T P Y M T # 5 9 2 5 - 2 1 5 - 9 2 - 0 0 - 8 0 5 0 4 , 0 7 0 . 1 0 0 3 1 8 5 W O L F S T . P R I N C I P A L P Y M T # 5 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 - 9 2 - 0 0 - 8 0 0 0 8 0 . 8 2 0 4 1 8 5 W O L F S T . I N T E R E S T P Y M T # 5 9 2 5 - 2 2 5 - 9 2 - 0 0 - 8 0 5 0 1 2 7 . 5 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 , 8 5 7 . 9 2 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 , 8 5 7 . 9 2 5 1 6 2 4 6 R 0 0 0 1 1 7 5 B R E T T B A R T K O S K I 0 9 2 4 1 3 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 O V E R P A Y M E N T O N U B F O R 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 4 . 8 8 0 2 A C C T # 0 1 0 3 1 2 0 8 1 0 - 1 2 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 . 8 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 . 8 8 5 1 6 2 4 7 R 0 0 0 1 2 4 8 R O B E R T S M I T H pg. 15 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 6 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 4 7 R 0 0 0 1 2 4 8 R O B E R T S M I T H 0 9 1 8 1 3 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 R E F U N D O V E R P A Y M E N T O N F I N A L 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 7 9 . 1 5 0 2 B I L L F O R A C C T # 0 1 0 7 5 3 7 3 9 0 - 0 1 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 9 . 1 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 9 . 1 5 5 1 6 2 4 8 R 0 0 0 1 2 4 9 D A V I D B A L L 0 9 1 8 1 3 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 R E F U N D O V E R P A Y M E N T O N U T I L I T Y 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 8 7 5 . 5 8 0 2 A C C O U N T # 0 1 0 2 2 4 2 2 0 0 - 1 4 B A C K T O * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 L A N D L O R D * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 7 5 . 5 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 8 7 5 . 5 8 5 1 6 2 4 9 R 0 0 0 1 2 5 0 G R E G O R Y L A M B E R T 0 9 1 8 1 3 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 C I T A T I O N O V E R P A Y M E N T O N C R E D I T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 0 7 0 . 0 0 0 2 C A R D * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 5 0 R 0 0 0 1 2 5 1 E V E R E T T M I T C H E L L 0 9 1 9 1 3 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 R E F U N D T O W B O N D F E E 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 4 3 - 0 0 - 4 3 2 5 5 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 5 1 R 0 0 0 1 2 5 2 A M E R I C A N H O M E S 4 R E N T 0 9 2 4 1 3 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 R E F U N D O V E R P A Y M E N T O N F I N A L 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 2 0 0 . 0 8 0 2 U B F O R A C C T # 0 1 0 3 5 2 0 1 4 0 - 0 9 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 0 . 0 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 0 0 . 0 8 pg. 16 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 7 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 5 2 R 0 0 0 1 2 5 3 M I C H A E L W I R T H 0 9 2 4 1 3 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 R E F U N D O V E R P A Y M E N T F O R U B 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 2 7 2 . 0 3 0 2 A C C # 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 3 0 0 - 0 3 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 7 2 . 0 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 7 2 . 0 3 5 1 6 2 5 3 R I V R V I E W R I V E R V I E W F O R D 1 1 1 4 7 6 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 0 1 P A D 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 6 1 . 0 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 1 . 0 6 * 1 1 1 4 8 2 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 0 1 R O T A R Y A S S E M B L Y 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 1 9 9 . 9 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 9 9 . 9 6 * 1 1 1 5 2 7 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 S H O C K A B S O R B E R 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 1 5 1 . 7 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 1 . 7 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 1 2 . 7 8 5 1 6 2 5 4 S E N I O R S E N I O R S E R V I C E S A S S O C . 0 9 1 5 1 3 0 9 / 1 5 / 1 3 0 1 M A Y O R ' S T A B L E A T F A S H I O N S H O W 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 3 7 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 7 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 7 5 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 5 5 S E R V M A S C S E R V I C E M A S T E R C O M M . C L E A N I N G 1 6 4 1 1 6 0 9 / 1 5 / 1 3 0 1 O C T O B E R C I T Y O F F I C E C L E A N I N G 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 8 1 , 2 3 3 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 2 3 3 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 2 3 3 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 5 6 S H E L L S H E L L O I L C O . pg. 17 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 8 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 5 6 S H E L L S H E L L O I L C O . 0 6 5 3 5 6 2 3 0 3 0 9 - P D 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T E M B E R G A S O L I N E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 7 3 . 2 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 3 . 2 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 3 . 2 1 5 1 6 2 5 7 S H R E D I T S H R E D - I T 9 4 0 2 4 7 8 9 9 6 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T E M B E R 5 O N - S I T E S H R E D D I N G 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 1 0 8 . 5 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 8 . 5 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 8 . 5 1 5 1 6 2 5 8 S L E E Z E R J S L E E Z E R , J O H N 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 3 M O B I L E E M A I L 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 4 5 . 0 0 0 2 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 5 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 5 9 S T R E I C H S T R E I C H E R S I 1 0 4 6 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 0 1 T R A I N I N G A M M O 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 6 2 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 , 9 9 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 2 6 0 S U B U R L A B S U B U R B A N L A B O R A T O R I E S I N C . 3 1 0 3 0 0 9 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 C O L I F O R M & F L O U R I D E S A M P L E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 9 3 6 5 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 6 5 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 6 5 . 5 0 5 1 6 2 6 1 T A P C O T A P C O pg. 18 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 9 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 6 1 T A P C O T A P C O C M 0 0 4 8 6 1 0 9 / 0 9 / 1 3 0 1 R E T U R N E D M E R C H A N D I S E C R E D I T 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 9 - 4 5 . 6 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : - 4 5 . 6 0 * I 4 3 3 7 1 4 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 S I G N 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 9 1 0 8 . 8 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 8 . 8 2 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 3 . 2 2 5 1 6 2 6 2 U P S S T O R E M I C H A E L J . K E N I G 0 9 1 3 1 3 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 0 1 2 P K G S T O K F O 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 2 6 3 . 6 0 0 2 1 P K G T O S C H O N S T E D T I N S T R U M E N T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 2 5 2 . 9 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 1 6 . 5 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 1 6 . 5 1 5 1 6 2 6 3 V I S A V I S A 0 9 2 6 1 3 - C I T Y 0 9 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 I M L C O N F E R E N C E R E G I S T R A T I O N S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 0 2 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 5 . 5 7 0 3 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 5 . 5 7 0 4 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 6 6 . 2 1 0 5 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 9 . 1 8 0 6 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 5 . 5 7 0 7 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 1 3 . 8 6 0 8 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 9 . 1 8 0 9 H I T C H P I N S F O R P O W E R R A K E 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 2 7 . 9 6 1 0 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 3 5 . 1 6 1 1 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 3 5 . 1 6 1 2 P R E S C H O O L C R A F T S U P P L I E S 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 6 1 0 2 . 6 5 1 3 R E C E I P T B O O K S 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 1 6 1 . 0 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 3 4 7 . 0 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 3 4 7 . 0 9 pg. 19 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 0 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 6 4 V I S A V I S A 0 9 2 6 1 3 - L I B 0 9 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 3 6 . 6 0 0 2 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 3 6 . 6 0 0 3 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 3 7 . 9 2 0 4 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 7 . 4 5 0 5 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 3 6 . 6 0 0 6 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 4 5 . 7 5 0 7 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 7 . 4 7 0 8 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 5 0 . 3 3 0 9 S E P T E M B E R I N T E R N E T 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 5 0 . 3 3 1 0 I P W S O C O N F E R E N C E L O D G I N G 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 2 1 6 . 5 8 1 1 I L A W W A C L A S S R E G I S T R A T I O N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 2 2 0 0 . 0 0 1 2 M O N T H L Y W E B S I T E U P K E E P F E E 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 0 1 5 . 9 5 1 3 I C M A C O N F E R E N C E M E A L S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 5 4 . 7 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 0 3 6 . 2 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 0 3 6 . 2 8 5 1 6 2 6 5 V I T O S H C H R I S T I N E M . V I T O S H 1 5 7 1 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 M C H U G H A N N E X A T I O N 9 0 - 0 5 4 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 . 2 2 0 2 P R E S T W I C K A M E N D M E N T T O 9 0 - 0 5 5 - 5 5 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 . 2 2 0 3 A N N E X A T I O N * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 C O U N T R Y S I D E B O N D R E F I N A N C I N G 8 7 - 8 7 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 0 1 2 0 . 2 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 6 0 . 6 6 * 1 5 7 8 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T E M E B R 1 1 A D M I N H E A R I N G 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 0 . 0 0 * 1 5 7 9 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 S E P T E M B E R 1 8 A D M I N H E A R I N G 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 6 0 . 6 6 5 1 6 2 6 6 W A R E H O U S W A R E H O U S E D I R E C T pg. 20 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 1 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 6 6 W A R E H O U S W A R E H O U S E D I R E C T 2 0 6 2 7 0 9 - 0 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 C O R R E C T I O N T A P E , I B U P R O F R N , 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 7 2 . 1 4 0 2 O I N T M E N T , L E N S C L E A N E R * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 2 . 1 4 * 2 0 6 7 1 1 1 - 0 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 0 1 P A P E R 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 5 9 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 9 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 6 2 . 1 4 5 1 6 2 6 7 Y B S D Y O R K V I L L E B R I S T O L 0 5 5 1 - 0 1 0 3 6 5 2 9 4 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 A U G . B I O S O L I D T R A N S P O R T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 5 5 , 3 1 9 . 6 6 0 2 S E R V I C E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 , 3 1 9 . 6 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 , 3 1 9 . 6 6 5 1 6 2 6 8 Y N B O L D S E C O N D B A N K - Y O R K V I L L E 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 4 9 - 0 9 2 3 1 3 0 9 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 A N N U A L S A F E D E P O S I T B O X R E N T A L 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 8 2 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 2 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 8 2 . 5 0 5 1 6 2 6 9 Y O R K A C E Y O R K V I L L E A C E & R A D I O S H A C K 1 5 0 1 1 4 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 C A B L E 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 5 2 4 . 9 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 4 . 9 9 * 1 5 0 1 4 0 0 9 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 C H A I N L O O P 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 2 0 . 9 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 . 9 9 * 1 5 0 1 4 1 0 9 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 R E T U R N E D M E R C H A N D I S E C R E D I T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 - 2 0 . 9 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : - 2 0 . 9 9 * pg. 21 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 2 TI M E : 1 1 : 5 0 : 5 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2 6 9 Y O R K A C E Y O R K V I L L E A C E & R A D I O S H A C K 1 5 0 1 4 2 0 9 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 C H A I N L O O P 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 2 1 . 9 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 1 . 9 9 * 1 5 0 1 7 6 0 9 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 T R A P F L Y F O R W I N D O W S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 8 . 9 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 . 9 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 5 . 9 5 5 1 6 2 7 0 Y O R K S E L F Y O R K V I L L E S E L F S T O R A G E , I N C 0 9 2 3 1 3 - 4 5 0 9 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 O C T O B E R S T O R A G E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 7 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 5 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 2 0 2 , 4 9 2 . 4 9 pg. 22 DA T E : 0 9 / 2 6 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 4 : 4 7 : 4 5 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 6 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 8 6 R 0 0 0 1 2 5 4 A N K U R & D I V Y A B E H L 2 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 - B U I L D 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 9 5 6 S . C A R L Y B U I L D P R O G R A M 2 5 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 2 4 4 5 6 8 0 . 0 0 0 2 9 5 6 S . C A R L Y B U I L D P R O G R A M 5 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 5 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 0 3 9 5 6 S . C A R L Y B U I L D P R O G R A M 5 2 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 4 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 pg. 23 DA T E : 0 9 / 2 7 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 0 : 1 6 : 5 2 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 7 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 8 7 R 0 0 0 1 2 2 9 M I C H A E L N A G Y 2 0 1 3 0 2 3 7 - B U I L D 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 1 1 0 2 M I D N I G H T P L A C E B U I L D 1 6 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 1 1 0 2 M I D N I G H T P L A C E B U I L D 2 5 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 2 4 4 5 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 4 P R O G R R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 1 1 0 2 M I D N I G H T P L A C E B U I L D 2 3 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 5 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 0 6 P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 1 1 0 2 M I D N I G H T P L A C E B U I L D 5 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 2 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 8 P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 pg. 24 DA T E : 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 4 : 1 7 : 3 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 1 0 / 0 3 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 8 8 R 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 R A E & D A N I E L J O N E S 2 0 1 3 0 2 3 8 - B U I L D 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 1 4 8 8 C R I M S O N L N . B U I L D P R O G R A M 1 6 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 1 4 8 8 C R I M S O N L N . B U I L D P R O G R A M 2 5 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 2 4 4 5 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 3 1 4 8 8 C R I M S O N L N . B U I L D P R O G R A M 2 3 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 5 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 0 4 1 4 8 8 C R I M S O N L N . B U I L D P R O G R A M 5 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 2 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 pg. 25 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS MAYOR & LIQ. COM.908.34$ -$ 908.34$ -$ 69.49$ 977.83$ CLERK 518.33 - 518.33 1.97 27.94 548.24 TREASURER 51.67 - 51.67 5.55 3.78 61.00 ALDERMAN 3,900.00 - 3,900.00 311.17 275.06 4,486.23 ADMINISTRATION 11,852.05 - 11,852.05 1,271.72 834.11 13,957.88 FINANCE 7,271.27 - 7,271.27 780.20 533.23 8,584.70 POLICE 82,825.04 4,464.19 87,289.23 481.95 6,420.87 94,192.05 COMMUNITY DEV.7,671.62 - 7,671.62 795.40 556.78 9,023.80 STREETS 11,384.56 - 11,384.56 1,221.57 837.70 13,443.83 WATER 11,989.24 405.63 12,394.87 1,329.97 902.37 14,627.21 SEWER 5,216.83 - 5,216.83 559.77 393.28 6,169.88 PARKS 16,234.16 - 16,234.16 1,733.79 1,191.84 19,159.79 RECREATION 10,465.35 - 10,465.35 1,019.11 761.36 12,245.82 LIBRARY 16,114.68 - 16,114.68 1,003.61 1,202.15 18,320.44 TOTALS 186,403.14$ 4,869.82$ 191,272.96$ 10,515.78$ 14,009.96$ 215,798.70$ TOTAL PAYROLL 215,798.70$ UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY 9/27/2013 pg. 26 DATE BI-WEEKLY 9/27/2013 $215,798.70 $215,798.70 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE MANUAL CHECK - #516186 -BEHL BUILD CHECK 9/26/2013 $10,000.00 MANUAL CHECK - #516187 -NAGY BUILD CHECK 9/27/2013 $10,000.00 MANUAL CHECK - #516188 -JONES BUILD CHECK 10/3/2013 $10,000.00 BILLS LIST 10/8/2013 $202,492.49 $232,492.49 $448,291.19 TOTAL BILLS PAID TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL BILL LIST SUMMARY Tuesday, October 08, 2013 PAYROLL TOTAL PAYROLL pg. 27 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Mayor #1 Tracking Number CC 2013-64 Proclamation for Constitution Week City Council – October 8, 2013 Mayor Golinski Name Department UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Proclamation WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States of America, the guardian of our liberties, embodies the principles of limited government in a Republic dedicated to rule by law; and WHEREAS, September 17, 2013, marks the two hundred twenty-sixth anniversary of the framing of the Constitution of the United States of America by the Constitutional Convention; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to accord official recognition to this magnificent document and its memorable anniversary, and to the patriotic celebrations which will commemorate it; and WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuing of a proclamation each year by the President of the United States of America designating September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gary J. Golinski, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as CONSTITUTION WEEK And ask our citizens to reaffirm the ideals the Framers of the Constitution had in 1787 by vigilantly protecting the freedoms guaranteed to us through this guardian of our liberties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the United City of Yorkville to be affixed this 8th day of October, in the year of our Lord, two thousand thirteen. _____________________________ Gary J. Golinski, Mayor Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Mayor #2 Tracking Number CC 2013-65 Resolution Supporting “Countywide Pay as We Grow Plan” Grant Application to CMAP City Council – October 8, 2013 Majority Approval See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Consideration of a resolution of approving a Kendall County CMAP grant. Background The CMAP Local Technical Assistance Program is a grant offered by CMAP to municipalities for regional planning or cooperation studies and projects. The City has submitted an application to CMAP with the Village of Oswego and the Village of Montgomery to study regional consolidation of services. The only commitment the City has made to Oswego and Montgomery is staff time, and the application is attached for your review. After we had committed to participate with Oswego and Montgomery, Kendall County approached us and asked us to support a grant application for a region-wide study of the cost of growth and asked for our participation in the study. This was discussed at the September Kendall County Mayors and Managers meeting and both the mayor and I feel it is a worthy study to support. While the grant application and the City’s own ordinances do not require a formal approval by City Council, Kendall County felt that a resolution of support would improve their chances of receiving a grant. The only commitment the City will be making is for staff time to produce documents, participate in meetings and review the study as occurs. The result of the study could be a tailored report and data for us to use in planning and managing growth – so there is a deliverable in the study from which we will benefit. We could back out of the study at any time at our discretion but we think the study will be useful to the City as it goes forward. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the resolution of support for the Kendall County CMAP grant. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: Subject: Resolution No. 2013-______ Page 1 Resolution No. 2013-_____ RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE “COUNTYWIDE PAY AS WE GROW PLAN” GRANT APPLICATION TO CHICAGO METROPOLITAN AGENCY FOR PLANNING WHEREAS, Kendall County has submitted a grant application for local technical assistance offered through CMAP (Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning) to create a “Countywide Pay As We Grow Plan”; and WHEREAS, this proposed plan would comprehensively analyze the annual rate of residential growth that can be absorbed and served effectively by each taxing unit within Kendall County, including the county, schools, villages/cities, library districts, park districts, forest preserve district, fire districts, sanitary sewer districts, townships, and other taxing districts, while minimizing property tax impact on residents; and WHEREAS, the implementation of the proposed “Countywide Pay As We Grow Plan” would fulfill the GO TO 2040 recommendations as a comprehensive sustainability plan incorporating goals for livable communities, education and efficient governance; and WHEREAS, the “Countywide Pay As We Grow Plan” would also benefit the public and people of our community; and WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville acknowledges that undertaking such a plan requires a firm commitment and use of staff resources; and WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville desires to participate and lead in regional cooperative efforts to improve our entire community and serve as a model of such a collaborative effort; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, if Kendall County is awarded a local technical assistance grant by CMAP, the United City of Yorkville agrees to participate and lead in this effort; BE IT FURTHER RESOVLVED, the United City of Yorkville appoints City Administrator Bart Olson as contact for this project, and The “Countywide Pay As We Grow Plan” is hereby supported by the United City of Yorkville. ADOPTED BY the United City of Yorkville, this ____ day of _________________, A.D. 2013. CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ LARRY KOT ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ ROSE ANN SPEARS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ Resolution No. 2013-______ Page 2 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ________ day of ____________________, A.D. 2013. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ ATTEST: CITY CLERK Application form: Community Planning program and Local Technical Assistance program DEADLINE: Noon on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 This application form is online at www.rtachicago.com/applications. You may submit the form by email to applications@rtachicago.com. Upon receipt of application, you will receive an e-mail verifying that your application has been received. 1. Name of Applicant: Village of Oswego 2. Main Contact for Application (please include name, phone number and email): Tia Brooks 630-551-2392 Tbrooks@oswegoil.org 3. Type of Applicant (please check any that apply): ____ Local government __X__ Multijurisdictional group* Please list the members of the group (including government and nongovernmental organizations): The Village of Oswego, The Village of Montgomery, The United City of Yorkville __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ ____ Nongovernmental organization* Name of local government partner(s): __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ *Applications submitted by multijurisdictional groups and nongovernmental organizations must include a letter indicating support from each relevant local government. See the FAQs for more information. Nongovernmental applicants are strongly encouraged to contact CMAP or the RTA prior to submitting their application to discuss their project and the demonstration of local support. 4. Project Type (please check any that apply): Please check all statements below that describe characteristics of your project. (This will help us determine whether your project is best handled by CMAP or RTA.) _X___ My project involves preparation of a plan. ____ My project helps to implement a past plan. ____ My project links land use, transportation, and housing. ____ My project has direct relevance to public transit and supports the use of the existing transit system. _X___ My project is not directly related to transportation or land use, but implements GO TO 2040 in other ways. 5. Project Location: Please provide a brief description of the location of your project. You may include a map if that helps to describe location, but this is not required. If your project helps to implement a past plan, please include a link to that plan. The location of the project includes; the Village of Oswego and The City of Yorkville (both located in Kendall County) and the Village of Montgomery (located in both Kendall and Kane County). 6. Project Description: Please tell us what you would like to do in your community, and what assistance is needed. If you have more than one idea, please submit a separate application for each project. Please be specific, but also brief (less than two pages per project idea)—we simply want to have a basic understanding of what you want to do. CMAP and RTA staff will follow-up with you if we need any additional information to fully understand your proposed project. (Please include any additional information that is relevant, preferably by providing links to online documents.) The Village of Oswego, the Village of Montgomery, and the City of Yorkville would like to propose a multi-community study to specifically research and identify potential opportunities that could be implemented to increase our financial and operational efficiencies through working together. We feel that there is potential to benefit from service sharing, joint purchasing, joint bidding and other yet unexplored areas between our three communities. This type of study would directly address the GO TO 2040 Plan’s intent of efficient government, as well as fostering regional cooperation. There are many opportunities to coordinate or consolidate services within our municipalities and perform them on a joint basis. This project would determine the types of services that would best meet our needs and be most efficient. For example, joint purchasing, bidding or service sharing could possibly result in lower unit costs and less individual coordination for many of those tasks we perform individually (road resurfacing, sidewalk repairs, tree trimming, street sweeping, payroll processing, code enforcement inspections, building inspections, etc.). An objective study of the issue by CMAP would be instrumental in assisting us with identifying the possibilities. The Village of Oswego, the Village of Montgomery, and the City of Yorkville have a common goal of efficient and cost effective governance. We share a common goal and desire to be leaders in the service sharing trend. Since we fall within a multi-county area, it would be advantageous to the study, providing valuable information and solutions for similar communities in the future. Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Mayor #3 Tracking Number CC 2013-68 Hometown Days Report City Council – October 8, 2013 See attached memo. Tim Evans Recreation Name Department Summary Review of the Hometown Days budget performance and discussion of merging the event with 4th of July festivities. Background The annual July 4th celebration and Hometown Days Festival are Yorkville traditions that have brought families and friends together to celebrate Independence Day and the end of summer for decades. For the past 8 years the Parks and Recreation Department has been responsible for the annual United City of Yorkville Hometown Days Festival. For 57 years the Bristol Kendall Fire Department was responsible for the 4th of July Celebration. However, in 2012 the Fire Department decided they would no longer be able to oversee the 4th of July event event. With the help of numerous Yorkville citizens and organizations, as well as with the city allowing staff to volunteer their time, cover the event insurance and provide numerous pieces of equipment, the 4th of July celebration was able to continue as usual for a successful 58th year. Financial reports for both events are as follows: Hometown Days Report Summary 2013 Income Posted $90,432.00 Expense Posted $90,910.07 Total Profit ($478.07) Summary 2012 Income Posted $119,234.70 Expense Posted $ 92,191.00 Total Profit $ 27,043.70 Memorandum To: City Council From: Tim Evans, Superintendent of Recreation CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Lisa Pickering, Deputy Clerk Date: October 8, 2103 Subject: Hometown Days and 4th of July Report July 4th Report Summary 2013 Income Posted $ 12,072.81 Expense Posted $ 5,765.02 Total Profit $ 6,307.79 In comparing the 2012 vs. the 2013 Hometown Days report, the event went from a profit of $27,043 in 2012 to a loss of $478 in 2013. The reason for the loss in 2013 was the festival being completely rained out on Friday evening. On Saturday morning and Sunday morning we had to partially shut down due to rain and lightning. The 4th of July report for revenue and expense is a one year report only due to the fact this was the first year that the city oversaw the event and we do not have a comparison to go by. At this time the report shows a $6,307.79 surplus. However, the Fire Department paid $10,921.61 of the $13,000 fireworks fee this year. The Fire Department has not committed any funds towards the 2014 celebration. In addition, New Life church did pay and provide staff for the free famil y activities area this year. While they have agreed to do this again next year, we must be aware of the fact that if they ever decide not to provide this service, it would be an additional $2,000-$4,000 expense. Overall, we are looking at having to find $10,000 to $12,000 in new revenue for the 2014 4th of July celebration. Recommendation For these two outstanding Yorkville traditions to continue for future generations,and be financially viable, it is staff recommendation to combine the two events and host both events on July 3 & 4 in the future. The reasoning for this recommendation is as follows: 1.) The 4th of July committee needs to have the city’s involvement at a high level for the celebration to continue in the future. The city provides the insurance, police, signs, port- a-lets, park and rec. staff and overall guidance to the committee. It would be very difficult for the 4th of July to continue without the city’s involvement. 2.) From a city staff perspective, it would save money by reducing staff hours spent (one festival instead of two). The majority of the staff hours saved would be within the Police Department and Parks and Recreation Department. 3.) We would avoid conflicts with school district events (football games). 4.) Because of the large financial commitment it takes to host both of these events, it would lessen the potential for a negative financial impact on the city budget. Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number PW #1 Tracking Number PW 2013-43 Caledonia Subdivision – Letter of Credit Call City Council – October 8, 2013 See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Discussion on whether to call the letters of credit for the Caledonia subdivision. Background This item was on the September 24th City Council agenda, which was cancelled due to lack of agenda items. Prior to the September 24th City Council meeting, the Caledonia letter of credit owner (developer) had contacted the City and indicated they were aware of the letter of credit call and could give the City a commitment to finish the development. The meeting between City staff and the letter of credit owner (developer) is set to occur Thursday afternoon, after City Council packets are finalized. Recommendation It is likely the meeting between City staff and the developer will result in a solution to finish the infrastructure in the development. If this is the case, the staff recommendation will be to table the letter of credit call indefinitely. The September 24th City Council packet materials are included in this packet in the event that the meeting between City staff and developer is not fruitful and the City Council wishes to authorize the letter of credit call at the October 8th City Council meeting. Staff will provide a verbal update at the City Council meeting as to the outcome of the staff/developer meeting Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: October 3, 2013 Subject: Caledonia – Letter of Credit Call The United City of Yorkville is currently holding irrevocable letter of credits (LOC’s) as noted below for work to be completed on the Caledonia Subdivision: Phase 1  Old Second Bank No. 2912 $745,764.75  Old Second Bank No. 2927 $57,151.80 Phase 2  Old Second Bank No. 2968 $361,512.45  Old Second Bank No. 309000356 $69,866.50 The LOC’s for Phase 1 of the development have been in place since August 4, 2005 and for Phase 2 of the development since August 11, 2006. The developer has failed to complete the land improvements per the approved plan for the development and has some significant outstanding work as outlined in the attached punchlist letter and cost estimate dated December 19, 2012. We have attached correspondence from the City, dated March 4, 2013 that was sent to the developer in an attempt to obtain a new development schedule. No significant progress has been made since the correspondence was sent. Based on the amount of outstanding work and the lack of progress from the current developer, staff is recommending that the LOC’s be called in their entirety for the completion of the work. In addition to the correspondence noted above, we have attached the copies of the LOC’s for your information. Should the Public Works Committee be in favor of calling the LOC’s for the Caledonia Subdivision, this matter can be placed on the September 24, 2013 City Council meeting agenda for further discussion and consideration. Upon approvals, letters to Old Second Bank will be drafted and sent via certified mail immediately. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: September 9, 2013 Subject: Caledonia Subdivision Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. The developer has requested that this item be tabled to the October 22, 2013 City Council meeting. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number EDC #1 Tracking Number EDC 2013-28 Fourth amendment to the Imperial Investments TIF agreement City Council – October 8, 2013 CC 9/10/13 Tabled EDC 2013-28 Table to the October 22, 2013 City Council meeting. Review of a fourth amendment to the Imperial Investments TIF agreement, related to the undergrounding of electric infrastructure Bart Olson Administration Name Department Majority The petitioner has requested that we table this item to the October 22nd City Council meeting. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: October 3, 2013 Subject: Imperial Investments TIF agreement – 4th amendment Summary Consideration of a fourth amendment to the Imperial Investments TIF agreement for the funding of the utility underground construction project. Background This item was last discussed at the August 27th City Council meeting, where it was tabled to the September 10th City Council meeting. At the time of the August 27th City Council meeting, staff had not yet spoken with the developer about the City Council request for both the upfront and back-end payments to be non-guaranteed. Since then, we have had a chance to speak with the developer, and they have indicated the City Council request would be acceptable. I have included the draft agreement with the changes requested by City Council. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the fourth amended TIF agreement with Imperial Investments. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: September 5, 2013 Subject: Imperial Investments TIF agreement fourth amendment 1 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Imperial Investments, LLC) THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT (the “Fourth Amendment”) to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Project Area dated April 23, 2012, as amended January 8, 2013, April 9, 2013 and July 18, 2013, by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, a municipal corporation (hereafter the “City”) and Imperial Investments, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (hereafter the “Developer”), is dated this ____ day of _____________, 2013. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2006-46 adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City (the “Corporate Authorities”), the Downtown Yorkville Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project and Plan (hereinafter the “Redevelopment Plan”) was approved, which project and plan covered some of the oldest properties of the City constituting a significant portion of the City’s historic Downtown; and, WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2006-47 and No. 2006-48 adopted by the Corporate Authorities on June 13, 2006, the City designated approximately 200 acres containing 114 buildings as a “redevelopment project area” (the “Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area”) and adopted tax increment financing pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq.) (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and, WHEREAS, as authorized by the TIF Act, on April 23, 2013, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2012-06, the Corporate Authorities entered into the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Project Area (the “Original Agreement”) with the Developer in order to 2 induce the development and redevelopment of certain properties within the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Original Agreement, the City agreed to reimburse the Developer for Redevelopment Project Costs as specifically identified therein for the following four (4) Projects: 1. Cobblestone Bakery, Project No. 1; 2. Follies Theater, Project No. 2; 3. Follies Box Office, Project No. 3; and, 4. Van Emmon Apartments, Project No. 4; and, WHEREAS, on January 8, 2013, the Original Agreement was amended to add the following additional redevelopment projects (the “Additional Projects”) and provide additional incentives as set forth in the First Amendment to the Original Agreement: 1. 209 South Bridge Street; 2. The parking lot immediately to the north of 209 Bridge Street; 3. 213 South Bridge Street; and, 4. An expansion of the Cobblestone Bakery Project No. 1; and, WHEREAS, on April 9, 2013, the Original Agreement was again amended to include new redevelopment projects at 102 E. Van Emmon Street (the “Bank Property”) and a parking lot located at the northeast corner of West Van Emmon Street and the west alley (the “Parking Lot”); and on July 18, 2013, was again amended to further enhance the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area by undertaking the demolition of a portion of a utility station 3 owned by the City and replacing the façade on the portion remaining and creating a pedestrian walkway; and, WHEREAS, once again the Developer has submitted a proposal to the City to undertake additional improvements Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area to remove the unsightly cable, electrical and telephone lines now located between the west alley at the corner of West Van Emmon Street and 101 West Van Emmon, as depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and locating these lines underground (the “Utility Line Relocation Project”); and, WHEREAS, in order to induce the Developer to continue with The Projects approved in the Original Agreement, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase, the Fourth Redevelopment Phase, and the Utility Line Restoration Project (collectively, “The Projects”), the City designated a portion of the commercial area of the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area as a “Business District” in accordance with the Business District Development and Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.3 et seq.) (the “Business District Act”), on January 8, 2013; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Business District Act, once a business district is designated, the Corporate Authorities may impose a retailers’ occupation tax, service occupation tax, and a hotel operators’ occupation tax in an amount not to exceed one percent (1%) to pay costs to be incurred in connection with the planning, execution and implementation of the goals and objectives as set forth in the business district plan, and the Corporate Authorities have, in fact, imposed a retailers’ occupation tax and a service occupation tax of one percent (1%) in the business district; and, 4 WHEREAS, the City desires the Developer to proceed with The Projects as stated in the Original Agreement, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase and the Fourth Redevelopment Phase and the Utility Line Relocation Project and is, therefore, willing to commit additional incentives available pursuant to the Act and the Business District Act in order to induce the Developer to proceed, all as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. Incorporation. The representations and recitations set forth in the preambles hereto are material to this Fourth Amendment and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Fourth Amendment as though fully set forth in this Section I and said representations and recitations constitute the understandings of the City and the Developer. Section 2. The Imperial Investment Utility Line Relocation Project Feasibility Study. A. The Developer has undertaken a study to determine if it is financially feasible as well as practical, to relocate the unsightly electrical, cable and telephone lines located between the west alley at the northeast corner of W. Van Emmon Street and 101 W. Van Emmon, as depicted on Exhibit A hereto to an underground location (the “Feasibility Study”). The Developer has submitted said Feasibility Study to the City and is consulting with the City on the economic viability of proceeding with the Utility Line Relocation Project. B. The Developer has advanced all necessary funds required to complete the Feasibility Study, the cost of which is a Redevelopment Project Cost which shall be reimbursable as provided in Section 4 below. 5 Section 3. Developer’s Obligations as a Condition Precedent to the City’s Commitment. A. In the event the Utility Line Relocation Project is determined to be feasible by both the City and the Developer after joint review, discussion and consultation, the Developer agrees to undertake the Utility Line Relocation Project on or before December 31, 2015, in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all permits and approvals. B. The Developer shall not be eligible for reimbursement for any of the costs incurred in connection with the Utility Line Relocation Project unless and until said project is completed in accordance with all permits and approvals. Section 4. Obligations and Commitments of the City. A. So long as no notice pursuant to Section 20 of the Original Agreement has been issued and remains outstanding, the City shall reimburse the Developer for “Redevelopment Project Costs” as follows: 1. Upon completion of the Utility Line Relocation Project by the Developer and approval thereof by the City Engineer, the Developer shall submit to the City a Request for Reimbursement, as provided in the Original Agreement. The City shall reimburse the Developer in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) fifty percent (50%) of the cost of the Utility Line Relocation Project; or, (ii) $130,000. Said amount shall be immediately due and payable to the Developer upon acceptance by the City of said Utility Line Relocation Project from that portion of the STAF (as defined within the Original Agreement) not otherwise obligated to the Developer. If sufficient funds are not available in the STAF, reimbursement shall be made to the Developer from future deposits into the STAF. 6 2. It is the intent of the City to ultimately reimburse the Developer for eighty percent (80%) of the total cost of the Utility Line Relocation Project. The City agrees to reimburse the Developer the difference between the total cost of the Utility Line Relocation and the amount paid to the Developer pursuant to 2 above (the “Additional Reimbursement”), said Additional Reimbursement to be payable in ten (10) equal annual installments from that portion of the STAF (as defined in the Original Agreement) not otherwise obligated to the Developer. If sufficient funds are not available in the STAF, reimbursement shall be made to the Developer from future deposits into the STAF.from Incremental Taxes generated from all properties owned by the Developer. Section 5. Undertakings on the Part of Developer. The Developer hereby covenants and agrees to promptly pay, as the same become due, any and all taxes and governmental charges of any kind that may at any time be assessed with regard to any of its business operations in the City including all real estate taxes assessed against the Imperial Investment Projects, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase, the Fourth Redevelopment Phase or any other location owned or controlled by the Developer. Section 6. Term. Section 7 of the Original Agreement is understood to have been amended to state that unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section 20 of the Original Agreement, the term of this Redevelopment Agreement shall commence on the date of execution and end December 31, 2029, regarding the City’s obligation to deposit Incremental Taxes into the Imperial Sub-Account and December 31, 2036, with regard to the City’s obligation to deposit BD Taxes, into the Imperial Investment Sub-Account. 7 Section 7. All other provisions of the Original Agreement; as amended January 8, 2013, April 9, 2013 and July 18, 2013, by this Fourth Amendment one hereby affirmed as in full force and effect. Section 8. Counterparts. This Fourth Amendment Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation By: __________________________________ Mayor Attest: _________________________________ City Clerk IMPERIAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Illinois liability company By: __________________________________ President Attest: __________________________________ Secretary 9 Exhibit A UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS ________________________________________________________________________ ORDINANCE NO. 2013-___ ________________________________________________________________________ AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Imperial Investments, LLC) Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois This 10th day of September, 2013 Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois on _________________, 2013. Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 2 Ordinance No. 2013-____ AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Imperial Investments, LLC) WHEREAS, pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act of the State of Illinois, 65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1, et seq., as from time to time amended (the “TIF Act”), the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville (collectively, the “Corporate Authorities”) entered into an Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Project Area (the ”Original Agreement”) with Imperial Investments, LLC (the “Developer”) in order to induce the development and redevelopment of certain properties within the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area; and, WHEREAS, on January 8, 2013, the Original Agreement was amended by a First Amendment to add additional projects and provide additional incentives; and, WHEREAS, on April 9, 2013 the Amended Agreement was further amended by a Second Amendment to include the Developer’s proposal to redevelop, rehabilitate and renovate the Bank Property and the Parking Lot and the City agreed to commit additional incentives; and, WHEREAS, on July 18, 2013, the Amended Agreement was again amended to further enhance the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area by undertaking the partial demolition of a utility station owned by the City and replacing the façade on the portion remaining and constructing a pedestrian walkway; and, WHEREAS, in order to assist with the Additional Projects, the Corporate Authorities by Ordinance No. 2013-01 designated a portion of the commercial area of the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area as a “Business District” in accordance Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 3 with the Business District Development and Redevelopment Law (65 ILCS 5/11-74.3 et seq.) (the “Business District Act”) and imposed a one percent (1%) retailers’ occupation tax and a service occupation tax as permitted by the Business District Act (the “BD Taxes”) in order to pay redevelopment project costs; and, WHEREAS, once again the Developer has submitted a proposal to the City to undertake additional improvements Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area to remove the unsightly cable, electrical and telephone lines now located between the west alley at the corner of West Van Emmon Street and 101 West Van Emmon, as depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and locating these lines underground (the “Utility Line Relocation Project”); and, WHEREAS, once again the Developer has submitted a proposal to the City to undertake additional improvements Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area the unsightly cable, electrical and telephone lines now located between the west alley at the corner of West Van Emmon Street and 101 West Van Emmon, and to relocate these lines underground; and, WHEREAS, the City desires the Developer to continue to undertake improvements to the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area including the relocation of unsightly cable, electric and telephone lines, in accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth in the Fourth Amendment to the Original Agreement in the form attached hereto and made a part hereof. Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance as though fully set forth in this section. Section 2. That the FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Imperial Investments, LLC), attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by reference, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the United City of Yorkville. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this ________ day of ____________________, 2013. ______________________________ CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ CARLO COLOSIMO ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ LARRY KOT ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of _______________ 2013. ______________________________ MAYOR 1 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN YORKVILLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Imperial Investments, LLC) THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT (the “Fourth Amendment”) to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Project Area dated April 23, 2012, as amended January 8, 2013, April 9, 2013 and July 18, 2013, by and between the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, a municipal corporation (hereafter the “City”) and Imperial Investments, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company (hereafter the “Developer”), is dated this ____ day of _____________, 2013. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2006-46 adopted by the Mayor and City Council of the City (the “Corporate Authorities”), the Downtown Yorkville Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project and Plan (hereinafter the “Redevelopment Plan”) was approved, which project and plan covered some of the oldest properties of the City constituting a significant portion of the City’s historic Downtown; and, WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 2006-47 and No. 2006-48 adopted by the Corporate Authorities on June 13, 2006, the City designated approximately 200 acres containing 114 buildings as a “redevelopment project area” (the “Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area”) and adopted tax increment financing pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.4-1 et seq.) (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”); and, WHEREAS, as authorized by the TIF Act, on April 23, 2013, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2012-06, the Corporate Authorities entered into the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Project Area (the “Original Agreement”) with the Developer in order to 2 induce the development and redevelopment of certain properties within the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Original Agreement, the City agreed to reimburse the Developer for Redevelopment Project Costs as specifically identified therein for the following four (4) Projects: 1. Cobblestone Bakery, Project No. 1; 2. Follies Theater, Project No. 2; 3. Follies Box Office, Project No. 3; and, 4. Van Emmon Apartments, Project No. 4; and, WHEREAS, on January 8, 2013, the Original Agreement was amended to add the following additional redevelopment projects (the “Additional Projects”) and provide additional incentives as set forth in the First Amendment to the Original Agreement: 1. 209 South Bridge Street; 2. The parking lot immediately to the north of 209 Bridge Street; 3. 213 South Bridge Street; and, 4. An expansion of the Cobblestone Bakery Project No. 1; and, WHEREAS, on April 9, 2013, the Original Agreement was again amended to include new redevelopment projects at 102 E. Van Emmon Street (the “Bank Property”) and a parking lot located at the northeast corner of West Van Emmon Street and the west alley (the “Parking Lot”); and on July 18, 2013, was again amended to further enhance the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area by undertaking the demolition of a portion of a utility station 3 owned by the City and replacing the façade on the portion remaining and creating a pedestrian walkway; and, WHEREAS, once again the Developer has submitted a proposal to the City to undertake additional improvements Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area to remove the unsightly cable, electrical and telephone lines now located between the west alley at the corner of West Van Emmon Street and 101 West Van Emmon, as depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and locating these lines underground (the “Utility Line Relocation Project”); and, WHEREAS, in order to induce the Developer to continue with The Projects approved in the Original Agreement, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase, the Fourth Redevelopment Phase, and the Utility Line Restoration Project (collectively, “The Projects”), the City designated a portion of the commercial area of the Yorkville Downtown Redevelopment Project Area as a “Business District” in accordance with the Business District Development and Redevelopment Act (65 ILCS 5/11-74.3 et seq.) (the “Business District Act”), on January 8, 2013; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Business District Act, once a business district is designated, the Corporate Authorities may impose a retailers’ occupation tax, service occupation tax, and a hotel operators’ occupation tax in an amount not to exceed one percent (1%) to pay costs to be incurred in connection with the planning, execution and implementation of the goals and objectives as set forth in the business district plan, and the Corporate Authorities have, in fact, imposed a retailers’ occupation tax and a service occupation tax of one percent (1%) in the business district; and, 4 WHEREAS, the City desires the Developer to proceed with The Projects as stated in the Original Agreement, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase and the Fourth Redevelopment Phase and the Utility Line Relocation Project and is, therefore, willing to commit additional incentives available pursuant to the Act and the Business District Act in order to induce the Developer to proceed, all as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. Incorporation. The representations and recitations set forth in the preambles hereto are material to this Fourth Amendment and are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Fourth Amendment as though fully set forth in this Section I and said representations and recitations constitute the understandings of the City and the Developer. Section 2. The Imperial Investment Utility Line Relocation Project Feasibility Study. A. The Developer has undertaken a study to determine if it is financially feasible as well as practical, to relocate the unsightly electrical, cable and telephone lines located between the west alley at the northeast corner of W. Van Emmon Street and 101 W. Van Emmon, as depicted on Exhibit A hereto to an underground location (the “Feasibility Study”). The Developer has submitted said Feasibility Study to the City and is consulting with the City on the economic viability of proceeding with the Utility Line Relocation Project. B. The Developer has advanced all necessary funds required to complete the Feasibility Study, the cost of which is a Redevelopment Project Cost which shall be reimbursable as provided in Section 4 below. 5 Section 3. Developer’s Obligations as a Condition Precedent to the City’s Commitment. A. In the event the Utility Line Relocation Project is determined to be feasible by both the City and the Developer after joint review, discussion and consultation, the Developer agrees to undertake the Utility Line Relocation Project on or before December 31, 2015, in a good and workmanlike manner and in accordance with all permits and approvals. B. The Developer shall not be eligible for reimbursement for any of the costs incurred in connection with the Utility Line Relocation Project unless and until said project is completed in accordance with all permits and approvals. Section 4. Obligations and Commitments of the City. A. So long as no notice pursuant to Section 20 of the Original Agreement has been issued and remains outstanding, the City shall reimburse the Developer for “Redevelopment Project Costs” as follows: 1. Upon completion of the Utility Line Relocation Project by the Developer and approval thereof by the City Engineer, the Developer shall submit to the City a Request for Reimbursement, as provided in the Original Agreement. The City shall reimburse the Developer in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) fifty percent (50%) of the cost of the Utility Line Relocation Project; or, (ii) $130,000. Said amount shall be immediately due and payable to the Developer upon acceptance by the City of said Utility Line Relocation Project from that portion of the STAF (as defined within the Original Agreement) not otherwise obligated to the Developer. If sufficient funds are not available in the STAF, reimbursement shall be made to the Developer from future deposits into the STAF. 6 2. It is the intent of the City to ultimately reimburse the Developer for eighty percent (80%) of the total cost of the Utility Line Relocation Project. The City agrees to reimburse the Developer the difference between the total cost of the Utility Line Relocation and the amount paid to the Developer pursuant to 2 above (the “Additional Reimbursement”), said Additional Reimbursement to be payable in ten (10) equal annual installments from that portion of the STAF (as defined in the Original Agreement) not otherwise obligated to the Developer. If sufficient funds are not available in the STAF, reimbursement shall be made to the Developer from future deposits into the STAF. Section 5. Undertakings on the Part of Developer. The Developer hereby covenants and agrees to promptly pay, as the same become due, any and all taxes and governmental charges of any kind that may at any time be assessed with regard to any of its business operations in the City including all real estate taxes assessed against the Imperial Investment Projects, the Additional Projects, the Third Redevelopment Phase, the Fourth Redevelopment Phase or any other location owned or controlled by the Developer. Section 6. Term . Section 7 of the Original Agreement is understood to have been amended to state that unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section 20 of the Original Agreement, the term of this Redevelopment Agreement shall commence on the date of execution and end December 31, 2029, regarding the City’s obligation to deposit Incremental Taxes into the Imperial Sub-Account and December 31, 2036, with regard to the City’s obligation to deposit BD Taxes, into the Imperial Investment Sub-Account. 7 Section 7. All other provisions of the Original Agreement; as amended January 8, 2013, April 9, 2013 and July 18, 2013, by this Fourth Amendment one hereby affirmed as in full force and effect. Section 8. Counterparts. This Fourth Amendment Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal corporation By: __________________________________ Mayor Attest: _________________________________ City Clerk IMPERIAL INVESTMENTS, LLC, an Illinois liability company By: __________________________________ President Attest: __________________________________ Secretary 9 Exhibit A 1 3 2 6 4 5 KEY  1 thru 6 represents existing Utility Poles and lines to be removed.  Dark Blue Dashed Line Represents new subsurface utility lines to be run from North side of West Alley and Hydraulic to South sided of West Alley and Van Emmon. PROPOSED COMED DIAGRAM TO REMOVE UTILITY POLES AND REINSTALL COMED,ATT and COMCAST LINES BELOW GROUND Summary Consideration of a fourth amendment to the Imperial Investments TIF agreement for the funding of the utility underground construction project. Background This item was last discussed at the June Economic Development Committee meeting. At that meeting, the committee reviewed a third amended TIF agreement that contemplated utility undergrounding, pump-house façade improvements, and a partial tear-down of the pump-house. The committee members had some concern with the large upfront payment for the undergrounding project, and requested the construction of and payment for the underground utilities be isolated in its own agreement with further language indicating that the upfront payment would only be made by the City if TIF funds are available. This fourth agreement isolates the underground utility construction project, and contains language in Section 4A1 that states if no funds are available in the downtown TIF fund, that the payment will be made at a later date when TIF funds are available. Of note, the discussion at the June EDC meeting was that the upfront payment should not be guaranteed; the annual payments thereafter are currently drafted as guaranteed, due to their minor nature. The City and Imperial Investments expect that the final cost to underground all of the aboveground utilities in the area will cost between $200,000 and $260,000. However, this number is our own estimate. ComEd owns the poles that the electric, telephone, and cable wires are installed upon, and they can not give us a better cost estimate until our concept plan design is finished by ComEd. Imperial Investments authorized this concept plan and they are waiting to hear back from ComEd on a study schedule. The funding for the concept plan is addressed in the third amended TIF agreement with Imperial Investments. Around 80% of the cost to underground the aboveground utilities is for “public” infrastructure or private infrastructure not applicable to Imperial Investments properties. The public infrastructure would be the poles, feeder electric lines, and other electric, cable and telephone equipment used to bring the services into the immediate area. The private infrastructure would be the individual service lines into each property. Thus, only 20% of the total aboveground infrastructure cost is applicable to undergrounding the private electric lines for Imperial Investments’ properties. Accordingly, we have proposed the following: 1) Once the due diligence study is completed, the City and Imperial Investments will review the study results, and decide whether to proceed forward with the undergrounding. Either party can decline to proceed with the undergrounding. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: July 30, 2013 Subject: Imperial Investments TIF agreement fourth amendment 2) If both parties agree to proceed forward with the undergrounding of the construction, Imperial Investments will coordinate and complete the project with whatever payment system ComEd requires. Imperial Investments will send the City an invoice for 50% of the undergrounding cost, up to a maximum of $130,000. If TIF funds are not available to make this payment, the City will defer payment until TIF funds are available. a. If the total project is $200,000, the City cuts a check to Imperial Investments for $100,000. b. If the total project is $500,000, the City cuts a check to Imperial Investments for $130,000. 3) After the undergrounding is complete, the City will pay the increment from whatever amount is paid to Imperial Investments in #3 up to 80% of the total undergrounding project cost over a 10 year period. The City will make these payments whether TIF funds are available or not. a. In Scenario 3a above, Imperial Investments will send the City an invoice for the increment of $60,000, and the City pays that $60,000 off over 10 years at $6,000 per year. 80% x $200,000 = $160,000 $160,000 - $100,000 = $60,000 b. In Scenario 3B above, Imperial Investments will send the City an invoice for the increment of $270,000 and the City pays that $270,000 off over 10 years at $27,000 per year. 80% x $500,000 = $400,000 $400,000 - $130,000 = $270,000 4) The remaining 20% of the entire undergrounding project paid for by Imperial Investments is considered a TIF eligible and Business District Eligible Cost, available for reimbursement pursuant to those agreements. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the fourth amended TIF agreement with Imperial Investments. Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number EDC #2 Tracking Number EDC 2013-22 Disconnection of a Portion of the Hoover Forest Preserve City Council – October 8, 2013 EDC 10/1/13 Committee recommends de-annexation. EDC 2013-22 Majority See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Consideration of an ordinance to deannex a portion of the Hoover Forest Preserve property, at the request of the Forest Preserve District. Background The Economic Development Committee first reviewed this agenda item at their June meeting. At that meeting, the Committee decided not to move forward with the item on account of concerns over land-use issues (noise) and liquor control issues. The item was reconsidered at their October meeting, where Forest Preserve Board member Jeff Wehrli was present to address his concerns over duplication of liquor licensing services. At the October meeting, the committee felt that the duplication of liquor licenses would be too burdensome on Hoover lodge catering companies, and made the unanimous recommendation to the City Council to approve the deannexation ordinance. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the deannexation ordinance. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: October 3, 2013 Subject: Petition for Hoover Disconnection Summary Consideration of an ordinance to deannex a portion of the Hoover Forest Preserve property, at the request of the Forest Preserve District. Background The Economic Development Committee last reviewed this agenda item at their June meeting. At that meeting, the Committee decided not to move forward with the item on account of concerns over land-use issues (noise) and liquor control issues. The item was added to the agenda at the request of the Forest Preserve District, via Mayor Golinski. Representatives from the Forest Preserve District will be at the meeting to address the committee. At the June Committee meeting, my analysis memo stated that the Forest Preserve District must abide by the City’s zoning, building code and liquor laws. After the meeting, we did learn that the Forest Preserve District has the statutory authority to pass their own ordinance and opt out of the City’s building codes. As far as we know, they have not yet passed an ordinance. The statutory authority is intended to give them control over the construction and alteration of all buildings and structures and parts and appurtenances thereof. The City’s authority over zoning (including noise complaints) and liquor licensing would remain, if left in City limits. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: September 26, 2013 Subject: Petition for Hoover Disconnection Page 1 of 2 PETITION FOR DISCONNECTION OF LAND FROM THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE 1. The Kendall County Forest Preserve District is the legal owner of record for the following described property, which is presently located in the jurisdiction of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois: That part of the South Half of Section 31, Township 37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Lot 10 in “Fox Glen, Kendall Township, Kendall County, Illinois”; thence North 21°41’02” West, along the northerly extension of the Easterly Line of said Lot 10, a distance of 100.78 feet to the North Line of the former Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad; thence North 61°10’23” East, along said North Line, 770.11 feet for the point of beginning; thence North 17°30’25” West, 469.13 feet; thence South 61°10’23” West, 704 feet; thence South 28°49’37” East, 460 feet to said North Line of the former Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad; thence North 61°10’23” East, along said North Line, 611.92 feet to the point of beginning in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, and containing 6.9481 acres. (See Exhibit A attached). 2. As owner of record, The Kendall County Forest Preserve District hereby petitions the corporate authorities of the United City of Yorkville to allow for the disconnection of the above described property pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/7-3-4, which allows any territory within a municipality, which is upon the border but within the boundaries of the municipality, to be disconnected from the municipality, in the discretion of its corporate authorities, upon petition by the property’s owner of record. 3. In requesting this disconnection, the Kendall County Forest Preserve District attaches to this Petition a certificate from the Kendall County Clerk, which demonstrates that no city taxes or assessments are due and owing at this time. (See Exhibit B attached). 4. The above described property meets all of the statutory requirements for disconnection under 65 ILCS 5/7-3-4 as it is currently within the boundaries of the United City of Page 2 of 2 Yorkville, while on the border of the municipality, and it has no city taxes or assessments due and owing. 5. Petitioner requests that following no less than 30 days after filing of this Petition, the City Council pass an Ordinance in which said property described above is disconnected from the municipality and its jurisdiction pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/7-3-4. KENDALL COUNTY FOREST PRESERVE By: _______________________________ Jeff Wehrli Title: President, Kendall County Forest Preserve District Date: _______________________________ UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS _________________________________________________________________________ ORDINANCE NO. 2013-___ _________________________________________________________________________ AN ORDINANCE DISCONNECTING CERTAIN TERRITORY FROM THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois This ____ day of _________, 2013 Published in pamphlet form by the authority of the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois on _________________, 2013. Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 2 Ordinance No. 2013-__________ AN ORDINANCE DISCONNECTING CERTAIN TERRITORY FROM THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the “City”) is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and WHEREAS, the owners of record of the property described below and in Exhibit A have filed with the City a Petition to Disconnect (the “Petition”) such property pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/7-3-4; and WHEREAS, the subject property to this Petition is described as follows: That part of the South Half of Section 31, Township 37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Lot 10 in “Fox Glen, Kendall Township, Kendall County, Illinois”; thence North 21°41’02” West, along the northerly extension of the Easterly Line of said Lot 10, a distance of 100.78 feet to the North Line of the former Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad; thence North 61°10’23” East, along said North Line, 770.11 feet for the point of beginning; thence North 17°30’25” West, 469.13 feet; thence South 61°10’23” West, 704 feet; thence South 28°49’37” East, 460 feet to said North Line of the former Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad; thence North 61°10’23” East, along said North Line, 611.92 feet to the point of beginning in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, and containing 6.9481 acres (See Exhibit A attached); and WHEREAS, 65 ILCS 5/7-3-4 grants the City authority to disconnect territory from the municipality, in its discretion, following the presentment of a petition requesting disconnection; and WHEREAS, said Petition was filed with the City Clerk on May ____, 2013, being more than thirty (30) days prior to the date of this ordinance coming for consideration; and WHEREAS, the property that is subject to said Petition lies on the border of the City, and is presently within the boundaries of the City; and Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 3 WHEREAS, the Petition was accompanied by a certificate from the Kendall County Clerk, which demonstrated that there are no City taxes or assessments due up to the time of presentment of the Petition. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. The Corporate Authorities of the City find that the statements in the preamble of this Ordinance are true and accurate, and the same are incorporated into this section of the Ordinance by reference as though fully restated herein. Section 2. The Corporate Authorities of the City, in their own discretion and pursuant to the Petition to Disconnect, hereby disconnect the property described above and in Exhibit A from the United City of Yorkville and its jurisdiction, effective July 1, 2013. Section 3. A copy of this Ordinance, duly certified by the City Clerk, shall be filed with the Recorder of Kendall County within ninety (90) days after the effective date. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this _______ Day of ____________________, A.D. 2013. ______________________________ CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ LARRY KOT ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ ROSE ANN SPEARS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 4 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ________ Day of ____________________, A.D. 2013. ______________________________ MAYOR CERTIFICATION I, Debbie Gillette, the Kendall County Clerk and Recorder, hereby certify that the following property which is located within Parcel Number 02-31-300-012, in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, currently has no city taxes or assessments due or owing at the time of the filing of its Petition to Disconnect on or about May ____, 2013: That part of the South Half of Section 31, Township 37 North, Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Lot 10 in “Fox Glen, Kendall Township, Kendall County, Illinois”; thence North 21°41’02” West, along the northerly extension of the Easterly Line of said Lot 10, a distance of 100.78 feet to the North Line of the former Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad; thence North 61°10’23” East, along said North Line, 770.11 feet for the point of beginning; thence North 17°30’25” West, 469.13 feet; thence South 61°10’23” West, 704 feet; thence South 28°49’37” East, 460 feet to said North Line of the former Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad; thence North 61°10’23” East, along said North Line, 611.92 feet to the point of beginning in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, and containing 6.9481 acres FURTHER, Affiant sayeth not. ___________________________ Debbie Gillette SUBSCRIBED and SWORN To before me this _____ day of December, 2013. __________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number ADM #1 Tracking Number ADM 2013-50 Tax Levy Estimate City Council – October 8, 2013 See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Approval of a 2013 tax levy estimate, for purposes of publishing a public notice for an upcoming public hearing. Background Each year, the first step of the tax levy process involves adopting a tax levy estimate for purposes of holding a public hearing (if required). The recommended tax levy estimate for the City and Library operations (capped taxes) is $3,765,873. This amount is slightly higher than we expected as of the September Administration Committee meeting, as the new construction EAV provided by the County ended up being slightly higher than our first estimates. Per past practice and tax levy laws, the City expects the actual tax levy will be lower. In 2011, when the City was discussing property tax abatements and the FY 12 tax levy, the City unofficially adopted a plan to reduce its tax levy from FY 12 through FY 17 on account of the passage of the non-home rule sales tax referendum. This plan was amended as part of the FY 14 budget adoption, and is described as follows: 2.9% reduction in FY 14 (levy ordinances already approved by City Council) 2% reduction in FY 15 1% reduction in FY 16 1% reduction in FY 17 1% reduction in FY 18 The above reduction schedule is reflected between the City property tax line-item (a calculation of the City uncapped taxes and City capped taxes) and the Library property tax-line-item (a calculation of the Library uncapped taxes and Library capped taxes. The 2% overall reduction between Library and City property taxes will be achieved by an estimated 2.77% increase in the capped taxes (Library operations tax plus all City capped taxes), a 5.24% decrease in the Library uncapped taxes (through refinancing), and a 31.1% decrease in the City uncapped taxes (through abating more bond-related taxes). This plan reflects the City’s overall policy direction to continue to levy the maximum allowed under tax cap laws and to continue to reduce the non-abated, bond-related property taxes. This direction gives the City more flexibility with its property tax dollars because it receives more unrestricted property taxes than it does restricted property taxes (i.e. bond-related). Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: October 3, 2013 Subject: 2013 Tax Levy Estimate Details The FY 14 (2012 levy) certification from the County Clerk is attached to this memo. The first page contains all City (non-library) taxes, and the second page contains library taxes (operations and bonds for the building). If desired by the City, we could calculate a property tax cap for each page individually. Similar to last year, that conversation is moot for this year. Last levy year, the Library’s maximum tax levy only yielded $670,415, which was a decrease from their FY 13 amount of $691,905 and was below their FY 14 estimate of $700,000. During the FY 14 budget discussion, the City Council agreed to give the Library an additional ~$21,000 out of the City’s general fund so that the Library would not lose any money between FY 13 and FY 14. This year, that conversation is amplified because the expected further decrease in EAV means that the Library’s expected FY 15 levy will only be $646,010. This shortfall is a relatively moot point at tax levy time, however, because of the City’s over-arching policy direction to maximize the amount of capped taxes and to decrease the uncapped taxes to achieve the overall property decrease of 2%. In short, we’ll ask for more than we think we can get on the Library and City capped taxes, and direct all new property tax amounts to the Library to make them whole and to put the rest into the Police Pension Fund to pay down past shortfalls in the City contribution. The breakdown of the sublevies is attached for your review. These do not need to be formally decided upon until the City passes its levy ordinance in November or December. The County’s current EAV estimate is $430,673,222 which is a 2.81% decrease from last year. The City does not need to decide how much general fund money to give to the Library until the FY 15 budget is approved. The abatement ordinances for the non-abated (uncapped) City property taxes do not have to be voted on until January or February. Homeowner Impact The property tax bill lists the City and the Library as two different levies. The City (capped and uncapped) levy request will be 1.08% lower than it was in 2012 levy year (payable in 2013). The Library (capped and uncapped) will be 4.12% lower than it was in 2012 levy year (payable in 2013). Based on those two statements only, the amount that each property owner pays to the City and to the Library should be lower than the prior tax bill. For reasons 1 that will be fully explored in the public hearing and the subsequent discussions, this may not be the case for every property owner. Also, because the total EAV of the City has decreased at a rate greater than the rate of our property tax reductions, the tax rate itself will go up. Recommendation The preliminary staff recommendations for aggregate levy amounts are below. The breakdown of the individual sublevies is attached to this memo, but does not need to be set for purposes of holding a public hearing (they can be changed at anytime). The Administration Committee unanimously 1 Assessment reductions or increases of your property compared to all other properties in Yorkville. recommended the City follow the FY 14 budget property tax reduction plan (listed on the first page). The actual numbers to achieve the 2% overall reduction are below. We would propose to hold the public hearing at the November 12th City Council meeting. 2012 Levy Extension 2013 Maximum Levy (Estimate) 2013 Levy Recommended Amount City and Library Operations (Capped) 3,497,498 3,594,205 ~3,765,873 City Bonds (Uncapped) 486,150 N / A ~334,814 Library Bonds (Uncapped) 771.801 N / A 731,321 Totals 4.755.449 N / A 4,832,008 Property Type 2011 Rate Setting EAV 2012 Rate Setting EAV 2013 Estimated Rate Setting EAV % Change over Prior Yr EAV Farm 2,450,231$ Farm 2,568,351$ Estimated EAV 430,673,222$ -2.81% Residential 367,600,683$ Residential 332,551,186$ Commercial 112,753,206$ Commercial 101,264,981$ Industrial 7,283,729$ Industrial 6,720,962$ State Railroad 17,328$ State Railroad 17,328$ Total 490,105,177$ Total 443,122,808$ Estimated Total 430,673,222$ 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 Est.% Change over $ Change over Actual Rate Levy Request Levy Extension Rate Levy Request Levy Extension Estimated Rate Levy Request Prior Yr Ext.Prior Yr Ext. Corporate 0.21080 1,058,133$ 1,033,142$ 0.23542 1,043,154$ 1,043,200$ 0.25290 1,089,190$ 4.41%45,990$ Bonds & Interest 0.14766 723,683 723,689 0.10971 486,146 486,150 0.07774 334,814 -31.13%(151,336)$ IMRF Pension 0.09182 450,000 450,015 0.10155 450,000 449,991 0.10449 450,000 0.00%9$ Police Protection 0.07142 350,000 350,033 0.07898 350,000 349,978 0.08127 350,000 0.01%22$ Police Pension 0.08996 488,354 440,899 0.12292 662,538 544,687 0.17175 739,683 35.80%194,996$ Audit 0.00816 40,000 39,993 0.00677 30,000 29,999 0.00697 30,000 0.00%1$ Liability Insurance 0.00816 40,000 39,993 0.00903 40,000 40,014 0.00929 40,000 -0.03%(14)$ Social Security 0.06121 300,000 299,993 0.06770 300,000 299,994 0.06966 300,000 0.00%6$ School Crossing Guard 0.00510 25,000 24,995 0.00564 25,000 24,992 0.00580 25,000 0.03%8$ Unemployment Insurance 0.01020 50,000 49,991 0.01128 50,000 49,984 0.01161 50,000 0.03%16$ Subtotal City 0.70449 3,525,170$ 3,452,742$ 0.74900 3,436,838$ 3,318,990$ 0.79148 3,408,687$ 2.70%89,697$ Library Operations 0.14187 700,000$ 695,288$ 0.15000 700,000$ 664,658$ 0.16068 692,000$ 4.11%27,342$ Library Bonds & Interest 0.16232 795,486 795,511 0.17418 771,763 771,801 0.16981 731,321 -5.24%(40,480)$ Subtotal Library 0.30419 1,495,486$ 1,490,798$ 0.32418 1,471,763$ 1,436,459$ 0.33049 1,423,321$ -0.91%(13,138)$ Total City (PTELL & Non-PTELL)1.00868 5,020,656$ 4,943,540$ 1.07318 4,908,601$ 4,755,449$ 1.12197 4,832,008$ 1.61%76,559$ less Bonds & Interest 0.30998 1,519,169 1,519,200 0.28389 1,257,909 1,257,951 0.24755 1,066,135 -15.25%(191,816)$ PTELL Totals 0.69870 3,501,487$ 3,424,340$ 0.78929 3,650,692$ 3,497,498$ 0.87442 3,765,873$ 7.67%268,375$ 2013 Tax Levy - Proposed for Public Hearing 1 % Inc(Dec) Over $ Inc(Dec) Over 2011 Requested 2011 Extended 2012 Requested 2012 Extended 2013 Requested Prior Yr Extended Prior Yr Extended City 2,313,133 2,288,154 City 2,288,154 2,288,153 City 2,334,190 2.01%46,037 Library 700,000 695,288 Library 700,000 664,658 Library 692,000 4.11%27,342 Police Pension 488,354 440,899 Police Pension 662,538 544,687 Police Pension 739,683 35.80%194,996 City Debt Service 723,683 723,689 City Debt Service 486,146 486,150 City Debt Service 334,814 -31.13%(151,336) Library Debt Service 795,486 795,511 Library Debt Service 771,763 771,801 Library Debt Service 731,321 -5.24%(40,480) Total 5,020,656 4,943,540 Total 4,908,601 4,755,449 Total 4,832,008 1.61%76,559 less Bonds & Interest 1,519,169 1,519,200 less Bonds & Interest 1,257,909 1,257,951 less Bonds & Interest 1,066,135 -15.25%(191,816) PTELL Subtotal 3,501,487 3,424,340 PTELL Subtotal 3,650,692 3,497,498 PTELL Subtotal 3,765,873 7.67%268,375 - - - - - City Debt Service Levy Breakout City Debt Service Levy Breakout City Debt Service Levy Breakout Series 2005A - Debt Service Fund 326,379$ Series 2005A - Debt Service Fund 328,179$ Series 2005A - Debt Service Fund 329,579$ 98.44% Series 2007A - Water Fund 133,454$ Series 2007A - Water Fund 43,027$ Series 2007A - Water Fund 5,235$ 1.56% Series 2004B - Sewer Fund 263,850$ Series 2004B - Sewer Fund 114,940$ Series 2004B - Sewer Fund -$ 0.00% Total 723,683$ Total 486,146$ Total 334,814$ 2013 Tax Levy - Proposed for Public Hearing (Summary) 2 Property Type 2011 Rate Setting EAV 2012 Rate Setting EAV 2013 Estimated Rate Setting EAV % Change over Prior Yr EAV Farm 2,450,231$ Farm 2,568,351$ Estimated EAV 430,673,222$ -2.81% Residential 367,600,683$ Residential 332,551,186$ Commercial 112,753,206$ Commercial 101,264,981$ Industrial 7,283,729$ Industrial 6,720,962$ State Railroad 17,328$ State Railroad 17,328$ Total 490,105,177$ Total 443,122,808$ Estimated Total 430,673,222$ 2011 2011 2011 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 Est.% Change over $ Change over Actual Rate Levy Request Levy Extension Rate Levy Request Levy Extension Estimated Rate Levy Request Prior Yr Ext.Prior Yr Ext. Corporate 0.21080 1,058,133$ 1,033,142$ 0.23542 1,043,154$ 1,043,200$ 0.25290 1,089,190$ 4.41%45,990$ Bonds & Interest 0.14766 723,683 723,689 0.10971 486,146 486,150 0.07774 334,814 -31.13%(151,336)$ IMRF Pension 0.09182 450,000 450,015 0.10155 450,000 449,991 0.10449 450,000 0.00%9$ Police Protection 0.07142 350,000 350,033 0.07898 350,000 349,978 0.08127 350,000 0.01%22$ Police Pension 0.08996 488,354 440,899 0.12292 662,538 544,687 0.14257 614,005 12.73%69,318$ Audit 0.00816 40,000 39,993 0.00677 30,000 29,999 0.00697 30,000 0.00%1$ Liability Insurance 0.00816 40,000 39,993 0.00903 40,000 40,014 0.00929 40,000 -0.03%(14)$ Social Security 0.06121 300,000 299,993 0.06770 300,000 299,994 0.06966 300,000 0.00%6$ School Crossing Guard 0.00510 25,000 24,995 0.00564 25,000 24,992 0.00580 25,000 0.03%8$ Unemployment Insurance 0.01020 50,000 49,991 0.01128 50,000 49,984 0.01161 50,000 0.03%16$ Subtotal City 0.70449 3,525,170$ 3,452,742$ 0.74900 3,436,838$ 3,318,990$ 0.76230 3,283,009$ -1.08%(35,981)$ Library Operations 0.14187 700,000$ 695,288$ 0.15000 700,000$ 664,658$ 0.15000 646,010$ -2.81%(18,648)$ Library Bonds & Interest 0.16232 795,486 795,511 0.17418 771,763 771,801 0.16981 731,321 -5.24%(40,480)$ Subtotal Library 0.30419 1,495,486$ 1,490,798$ 0.32418 1,471,763$ 1,436,459$ 0.31981 1,377,331$ -4.12%(59,128)$ Total City (PTELL & Non-PTELL)1.00868 5,020,656$ 4,943,540$ 1.07318 4,908,601$ 4,755,449$ 1.08211 4,660,340$ -2.00%(95,109)$ less Bonds & Interest 0.30998 1,519,169 1,519,200 0.28389 1,257,909 1,257,951 0.24755 1,066,135 -15.25%(191,816)$ P-TELL Totals 0.69870 3,501,487$ 3,424,340$ 0.78929 3,650,692$ 3,497,498$ 0.83456 3,594,205$ 2.77%96,707$ 2013 Tax Levy - Estimated Actual 1 2013 Tax Levy - Estimated Actual % Inc(Dec) Over $ Inc(Dec) Over 2011 Requested 2011 Extended 2012 Requested 2012 Extended 2013 Requested Prior Yr Extended Prior Yr Extended City 2,313,133 2,288,154 City 2,288,154 2,288,153 City 2,334,190 2.01%46,037 Library 700,000 695,288 Library 700,000 664,658 Library 646,010 -2.81%(18,648) Police Pension 488,354 440,899 Police Pension 662,538 544,687 Police Pension 614,005 12.73%69,318 City Debt Service 723,683 723,689 City Debt Service 486,146 486,150 City Debt Service 334,814 -31.13%(151,336) Library Debt Service 795,486 795,511 Library Debt Service 771,763 771,801 Library Debt Service 731,321 -5.24%(40,480) Total 5,020,656 4,943,540 Total 4,908,601 4,755,449 Total 4,660,340 -2.00%(95,109) less Bonds & Interest 1,519,169 1,519,200 less Bonds & Interest 1,257,909 1,257,951 less Bonds & Interest 1,066,135 -15.25%(191,816) PTELL Subtotal 3,501,487 3,424,340 PTELL Subtotal 3,650,692 3,497,498 PTELL Subtotal 3,594,205 2.77%96,707 - - - - - City Debt Service Levy Breakout City Debt Service Levy Breakout City Debt Service Levy Breakout Series 2005A - Debt Service Fund 326,379$ Series 2005A - Debt Service Fund 328,179$ Series 2005A - Debt Service Fund 329,579$ 98.44% Series 2007A - Water Fund 133,454$ Series 2007A - Water Fund 43,027$ Series 2007A - Water Fund 5,235$ 1.56% Series 2004B - Sewer Fund 263,850$ Series 2004B - Sewer Fund 114,940$ Series 2004B - Sewer Fund -$ 0.00% Total 723,683$ Total 486,146$ Total 334,814$ 2013 Tax Levy - Estimated Actual (Summary) 2 PUBLIC NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX LEVY FOR THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE I. A public hearing to approve a proposed property tax levy increase by THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE for 2013 will be held November 12, 2013 at 7:00 P.M. at the City Council Chambers, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois. Any person desiring to appear at the public hearing and present testimony to the taxing district may contact Bart Olson, City Administrator, or Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois (630) 553-4350. II. The corporate and special purpose property taxes extended for 2012 were $3,497,498. The proposed corporate and special purpose property taxes to be levied for 2013 are $3,765,873. This represents a 7.67% increase over the previous year. III. The property taxes extended for debt service and public building commission leases for 2012 were $1,257,951. The estimated property taxes to be levied for debt service and public building commission leases for 2013 are $1,066,135. This represents a 15.25% decrease over the previous year. IV. The total property taxes extended or abated for 2012 were $4,755,449. The estimated total property taxes to be levied for 2013 are $4,832,008. This represents a 1.61% increase over the previous year. Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. The developer has requested that this item be tabled to the October 22, 2013 City Council meeting. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number PC #1 Tracking Number PC 2013-07 Grande Reserve Amended Annexation Agreement City Council – October 8, 2013 8/13/2013 Public hearing Two thirds majority Table to the October 22, 2013 City Council meeting. Consideration of a second amendment to the Grande Reserve annexation agreement regarding the payment of school transition fees. Bart Olson Administration Name Department The petitioner has requested that we table this item to the October 22nd City Council meeting. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: October 3, 2013 Subject: Grande Reserve Annexation Agreement – 2nd amendment Summary Approval of an annexation agreement amendment that records a land-cash agreement between the School District and Castle Bank on the property. Background This item was last discussed at the August 13th City Council meeting. Since that meeting, the City has been working with Castle Bank to revise the language in the annexation agreement and the hold harmless agreement to meet their requirements to be able to sell the debt certificate. The revised annexation agreement amendment is attached in a track changes and clean format. There are a few minor changes to the annexation agreement, none of which substantially change the content of the agreement. They are all clarifications of the existing obligations. The hold harmless agreement has been scrapped. Attorney Orr and Attorney Grant had been discussing the details of the hold harmless agreement for a few weeks, and ultimately couldn’t come to an agreement on a hold harmless agreement that gave the City any further protection for the existing obligations related to the land-cash fees in the 2009 agreement. Ultimately, Attorney Orr felt that the City had already committed to not reducing the number of units in the subdivision and to guaranteeing that the transition fees would be collected by the City and forwarded to a third party. Castle Bank did not want to hold the City harmless if we accidentally or purposefully failed to collect the fees or approved an amended land-use plan that reduced the number of units in the subdivision, without consulting the debt certificate holder. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the second amended annexation agreement. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: September 19, 2013 Subject: Grande Reserve Annexation Agreement Second Amendment -1- SECOND AMENDMENT TO ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Grande Reserve Subdivision) This Second Amendment to Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (this “Second Amendment”) is made as of the ____ day of SeptemberAugust, 2013, by the United City of Yorkville, a municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois (the “City”) and Grande Reserve (Chicago) ASLI VI, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership (“Owner” or “Current Owner”), owner of the vacant lots, and other real estate incidental to the development thereof, in the Grande Reserve Development, as more fully set forth in Exhibit “A” on the Plat of Annexation, attached to the hereinafter defined Original Agreement and referred to therein as the “SUBJECT PROPERTY”. WHEREAS, on July 22, 2003, MPI-2 Yorkville North LLC, MPI-2 Yorkville Central LLC and MPI-2 Yorkville South I LLC (collectively, the “Original Owners”) and the City made and entered into that certain Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “Original Agreement”), recorded as Document No. 200300032964 in the Office of the County Recorder of Kendall County, Illinois, to govern the annexation and development of the community commonly known as Grande Reserve situated in the City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois; WHEREAS, on December 10, 2004, the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 (the “School District”), authorized the execution of that certain Debt Certificate, Series 2004 dated December 15, 2004 in the face amount of $4,685,960 (the “Debt Certificate”) to Castle Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) in order to provide funds to construct a new grade school to serve the Grande Reserve Subdivision in the City; WHEREAS, on December 13, 2004, the Original Owners and the School District entered into that certain “Annexation Agreement Amendment – Land/Cash Donation Agreement”, which was intended to amend the Original Agreement, and is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (the “2004 Agreement”); WHEREAS, on October 13, 2009, the City passed Ordinance 2009-54, which approved that certain Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees from Grand Reserve Subdivision, Yorkville, Illinois attached hereto as Exhibit 2 (the “Assignment”); WHEREAS, the 2004 Agreement is executed by only the Original Owners and the School District, and not by the City, which acknowledges the existence of the 2004 Agreement, views the 2004 Agreement as if it had been signed by the City, and has been acting in accordance with its terms; WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was subsequently amended by that certain First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) entered into as of January 30, 2012, by the City and Quality Properties Asset Management Company, an Illinois corporation, as successor to the Original Owners (the “Successor Owner”); -2- WHEREAS, the Original Agreement, the First Amendment and this Second Amendment, together with any future amendments, are collectively referred to herein as the “Annexation Agreement”; WHEREAS, the City, the School District, and the Current Owner desire to actually and properly amend the Annexation Agreement to reflect the intentions of the 2004 Agreement; WHEREAS, this Second Amendment is made pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-1, et seq.; and, WHEREAS, prior to the date of this Second Amendment all public hearings were held upon proper notice and/or publications as are required for the City to affect the terms of this Second Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Current Owner agree as follows: 1. Exhibit H1 is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: “School Contribution. The school contribution was satisfied by the Original Owners and no further contributions of property shall be required of the Current Owner or any successor owner of the SUBJECT PROPERTY other than the Transition Fees described below. Transition Fee. The owner of each dwelling unit (“Unit”) on the SUBJECT PROPERTY shall pay a school transition fee in an amount equal to Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) per Unit (the “Transition Fee”). Each Transition Fee is a contribution of money as described in 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-2(d). The number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY shall not be less than 2,080 Units. The Transition Fee shall be paid to the School District on a per Unit basis at any time prior to issuance of a building permit for that Unit by the City. The School District shall provide satisfactory evidence to the City each time it receives a payment of a Transition Fee, which evidence shall indicate which Unit the Transition Fee was paid for. Absent such evidence from the School District, the City shall not issue a building permit for the applicable Unit. The City, School District and the Current Owner (as defined in the Second Amendment to this Agreement) acknowledge that as of the date of the adoption of the Second Amendment to this Agreement, the Transition Fees have been paid for 441 Units for a total of $1,323,000 with a balance due of $4,917,000 to be paid on the next 1,639 Units (1,639 Units x $3,000 = $4,917,000). The Transition Fees must be paid until the Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units has been received collectively by Castle Bank, N.A., in its capacity as holder of the Debt Certificate, any successor holders of the Debt Certificate and their respective successors and assigns as holders of the Debt Certificate (each, a “Certificate Holder”). -3- Disposition of Payments. All payments of Transition Fees shall be transferred directly to the Certificate Holder, when and as received (but not less than monthly) by either the School District or the City, and shall be applied to the outstanding balance of the Debt Certificate which is comprised of principal of and interest on the Debt Certificate. The School District and the City hereby agree that neither the School District nor the City shall make any agreements with the current or future mortgage holder or holders of mortgages encumbering the SUBJECT PROPERTY, or with the current or future owners of any portion of the SUBJECT PROPERTY, or any current or future developers of the SUBJECT PROPERTY, from which the Transition Fees are to be received, which will in any way reduce the amount of the Transition Fees, reduce the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY to below 2,080 Units or modify or amend the terms or mode of payment of the Transition Fees. Amendments to Exhibit “H1”. This Exhibit “H1” may not be amended or modified without the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder. 2. The City received an Application For Amendment dated May 31, 2013, to amend the Annexation Agreement, Exhibit “H1” and to approve and confirm an understanding by and between the Original Owners and the School District. 3. The City and the Current Owner hereby acknowledge and accept the terms of the 2004 Agreement, and agree to act in accordance with, and to be bound by, the terms thereof in the same way and to the same extent as if they were a party and duly authorized signatory thereto. 4. The City and the School District hereby acknowledge and reaffirm the terms of the Assignment, and agree to continue to act in accordance with, and to be bound by, the terms thereof. 5. In the event the terms of this Second Amendment conflict with the Original Agreement, the First Amendment, the 2004 Agreement, and/or the Assignment, this Second Amendment shall control. 6. Section 11. is hereby amended by adding the following sentence as the last sentence of Section 11.: OWNERS, DEVELOPER, CITY and School District shall each comply with the provisions of Exhibit “H1”. 7. Section 24. F. is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: F. Agreement. This Agreement and any Exhibits or attachments hereto, may be amended from time to time in writing with the consent of the parties, pursuant to -4- applicable provisions of the City Code and Illinois Compiled Statutes; provided however, that the parties can only amend the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement if they first obtain the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”). This Agreement may be amended by the CITY and the owner of record of a portion of the SUBJECT PROPERTY as to provisions applying exclusively thereto, without the consent of the owner of other portions of the SUBJECT PROPERTY not affected by such Agreement; provided however, that the parties can only amend the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement if they first obtain the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”). Prior written consent of the Certificate Holder as described in the preceding two sentences shall no longer be required for an amendment to this Agreement if the Certificate Holder has received Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units as further described in Exhibit “H1” and Exhibit “A”. 8. Section 24. A is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: A. Third Party Beneficiary and Enforcement. The Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”) is a third party beneficiary to this Agreement with respect to the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement; provided, however, that the Certificate Holder will no longer be a third party beneficiary upon receipt of the Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units as further described in Exhibit “H1” and Exhibit “A”. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the Circuit Court of Kendall County by any of the parties or their successors or assigns and by the Certificate Holder, as a third party beneficiary by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the performance of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois. 9. Section 24 B. is amended by deleting the phrase “a empty lot or” in the last sentence of Section 24. B. -5- 9.10. Section 24 I. is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: I. Term of Agreement. The Term of this Agreement shall be twenty (20 years). In the event construction is commenced within said twenty year-period all of the terms of this Agreement shall remain enforceable despite said time limitation, unless modified by written agreement of the CITY and DEVELOPER/OWNERS; provided however that the CITY and DEVELOPER/OWNERS may not modify the Term of this Agreement with respect to the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY, Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder. 10. This Second Amendment shall be in full force and effect as of the date first written above. -6- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to the Original Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal Corporation By: _______________________________________ Mayor Attest: _________________________________ City Clerk GRANDE RESERVE (CHICAGO) ASLI VI, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership By: Avanti Properties Group II, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership, its general partner By: Avanti Management Corporation, a Florida corporation, its general partner By: Name: Andrew Dubill Title: Vice President Attest: __________________________________ -7- JOINDER OF COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 115 Yorkville Community Unit School District No. 115 (the “School District”) has executed this Second Amendment in order to confirm the School District agrees to be bound by the terms of this Second Amendment and if, or to the extent, any of the foregoing matters agreed to in this Second Amendment requires the consent of the School District in order for such agreements to be binding and enforceable in accordance with their terms, such consent is hereby given. “SCHOOL DISTRICT” COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 115 Yorkville, Illinois Date: ________________ By: _________________________________ Tim ShimpDr. Thomas D. Engler, Superintendent -8- EXHIBIT 1 LAND/CASH DONATION AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 13, 2004 See attached. -9- EXHIBIT 2 ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES See attached. Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2013-_____ ORDINANCE APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Grande Reserve Subdivision) WHEREAS, on July 22, 2003, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”) and MPI-2 Yorkville North LLC, MPI-2 Yorkville Central LLC and MPI-2 Yorkville South LLC (collectively, the “Original Owners”) entered into a certain Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “Original Agreement”), recorded as Document No. 200300032964 in the Office of the County Recorder of Kendall County, Illinois, to govern the annexation of land and the development of approximately 2,080 dwelling units within the community to be known as the “Grande Reserve Subdivision” situated in the City of Yorkville, Kendal County, Illinois; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Original Agreement, the Original Owners contributed acres of land to enable the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 (the “School District”) to construct a new grade school to serve the Grand Reserve Subdivision and further agreed to pay a transition fee of $3,000 per dwelling unit (the “Transition Fee”) , which would be used to repay a debt certificate issued by the School District to finance the costs of the construction of the new grade school; and, WHEREAS, on October 13, 2009, the City passed Ordinance 2009-54 which approved a certain Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees to be derived from the dwelling units to be constructed in Grand Reserve Subdivision to the holder of the debt certificate and agreed not to enter into any agreements which would reduce, modify or amend the mode of payment of the Transition Fee; and, WHEREAS, Grande Reserve (Chicago) ASLI VI, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership (the “Current Owner”) is the successor to the interests of the Original Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 2 Owners and have requested the City to restate its commitment not to issue a building permit for a dwelling unit in the Grand Reserve Subdivision without evidence of payment in full of the Transition Fee and the transfer of said fee to the holder of the debt certificate; not to reduce, modify or amend the amount or mode of payment of the Transition Fee without the consent of the holder of the debt certificate; not to reduce the total number of platted dwelling units in the Grand Reserve Subdivision from a total of 2080; and, also to acknowledge that the holder of the debt certificate is a third party beneficiary to these commitments; and, WHEREAS, the City is prepared to agree to confirm its commitments regarding the collection and of the Transition Fee as set forth in the Second Amendment to the Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement in the form attached hereto and made a part hereof, upon NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, that the Second Amendment to Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (Grand Reserve Subdivision) in the form attached hereto is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and deliver said Second Amendment. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ________ day of ____________________, 2013. _______________________________ CITY CLERK Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 3 ROSE ANN SPEARS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ CARLO COLOSIMO ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ LARRY KOT ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of _______________ 2013. _______________________________ MAYOR -1- SECOND AMENDMENT TO ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Grande Reserve Subdivision) This Second Amendment to Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (this “Second Amendment”) is made as of the ____ day of September, 2013, by the United City of Yorkville, a municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois (the “City”) and Grande Reserve (Chicago) ASLI VI, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership (“Owner” or “Current Owner”), owner of the vacant lots, and other real estate incidental to the development thereof, in the Grande Reserve Development, as more fully set forth in Exhibit “A” on the Plat of Annexation, attached to the hereinafter defined Original Agreement and referred to therein as the “SUBJECT PROPERTY”. WHEREAS, on July 22, 2003, MPI-2 Yorkville North LLC, MPI-2 Yorkville Central LLC and MPI-2 Yorkville South I LLC (collectively, the “Original Owners”) and the City made and entered into that certain Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “Original Agreement”), recorded as Document No. 200300032964 in the Office of the County Recorder of Kendall County, Illinois, to govern the annexation and development of the community commonly known as Grande Reserve situated in the City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois; WHEREAS, on December 10, 2004, the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 (the “School District”), authorized the execution of that certain Debt Certificate, Series 2004 dated December 15, 2004 in the face amount of $4,685,960 (the “Debt Certificate”) to Castle Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) in order to provide funds to construct a new grade school to serve the Grande Reserve Subdivision in the City; WHEREAS, on December 13, 2004, the Original Owners and the School District entered into that certain “Annexation Agreement Amendment – Land/Cash Donation Agreement”, which was intended to amend the Original Agreement, and is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (the “2004 Agreement”); WHEREAS, on October 13, 2009, the City passed Ordinance 2009-54, which approved that certain Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees from Grand Reserve Subdivision, Yorkville, Illinois attached hereto as Exhibit 2 (the “Assignment”); WHEREAS, the 2004 Agreement is executed by only the Original Owners and the School District, and not by the City, which acknowledges the existence of the 2004 Agreement, views the 2004 Agreement as if it had been signed by the City, and has been acting in accordance with its terms; WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was subsequently amended by that certain First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) entered into as of January 30, 2012, by the City and Quality Properties Asset Management Company, an Illinois corporation, as successor to the Original Owners (the “Successor Owner”); -2- WHEREAS, the Original Agreement, the First Amendment and this Second Amendment, together with any future amendments, are collectively referred to herein as the “Annexation Agreement”; WHEREAS, the City, the School District, and the Current Owner desire to actually and properly amend the Annexation Agreement to reflect the intentions of the 2004 Agreement; WHEREAS, this Second Amendment is made pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-1, et seq.; and, WHEREAS, prior to the date of this Second Amendment all public hearings were held upon proper notice and/or publications as are required for the City to affect the terms of this Second Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Current Owner agree as follows: 1. Exhibit H1 is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: “School Contribution. The school contribution was satisfied by the Original Owners and no further contributions of property shall be required of the Current Owner or any successor owner of the SUBJECT PROPERTY other than the Transition Fees described below. Transition Fee. The owner of each dwelling unit (“Unit”) on the SUBJECT PROPERTY shall pay a school transition fee in an amount equal to Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) per Unit (the “Transition Fee”). Each Transition Fee is a contribution of money as described in 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-2(d). The number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY shall not be less than 2,080 Units. The Transition Fee shall be paid to the School District on a per Unit basis at any time prior to issuance of a building permit for that Unit by the City. The School District shall provide satisfactory evidence to the City each time it receives a payment of a Transition Fee, which evidence shall indicate which Unit the Transition Fee was paid for. Absent such evidence from the School District, the City shall not issue a building permit for the applicable Unit. The City, School District and the Current Owner (as defined in the Second Amendment to this Agreement) acknowledge that as of the date of the adoption of the Second Amendment to this Agreement, the Transition Fees have been paid for 441 Units for a total of $1,323,000 with a balance due of $4,917,000 to be paid on the next 1,639 Units (1,639 Units x $3,000 = $4,917,000). The Transition Fees must be paid until the Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units has been received collectively by Castle Bank, N.A., in its capacity as holder of the Debt Certificate, any successor holders of the Debt Certificate and their respective successors and assigns as holders of the Debt Certificate (each, a “Certificate Holder”). -3- Disposition of Payments. All payments of Transition Fees shall be transferred directly to the Certificate Holder, when and as received (but not less than monthly) by either the School District or the City, and shall be applied to the outstanding balance of the Debt Certificate which is comprised of principal of and interest on the Debt Certificate. The School District and the City hereby agree that neither the School District nor the City shall make any agreements with the current or future mortgage holder or holders of mortgages encumbering the SUBJECT PROPERTY, or with the current or future owners of any portion of the SUBJECT PROPERTY, or any current or future developers of the SUBJECT PROPERTY, from which the Transition Fees are to be received, which will in any way reduce the amount of the Transition Fees, reduce the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY to below 2,080 Units or modify or amend the terms or mode of payment of the Transition Fees. Amendments to Exhibit “H1”. This Exhibit “H1” may not be amended or modified without the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder. 2. The City received an Application For Amendment dated May 31, 2013, to amend the Annexation Agreement, Exhibit “H1” and to approve and confirm an understanding by and between the Original Owners and the School District. 3. The City and the Current Owner hereby acknowledge and accept the terms of the 2004 Agreement, and agree to act in accordance with, and to be bound by, the terms thereof in the same way and to the same extent as if they were a party and duly authorized signatory thereto. 4. The City and the School District hereby acknowledge and reaffirm the terms of the Assignment, and agree to continue to act in accordance with, and to be bound by, the terms thereof. 5. In the event the terms of this Second Amendment conflict with the Original Agreement, the First Amendment, the 2004 Agreement, and/or the Assignment, this Second Amendment shall control. 6. Section 11. is hereby amended by adding the following sentence as the last sentence of Section 11.: OWNERS, DEVELOPER, CITY and School District shall each comply with the provisions of Exhibit “H1”. 7. Section 24. F. is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: F. Agreement. This Agreement and any Exhibits or attachments hereto, may be amended from time to time in writing with the consent of the parties, pursuant to -4- applicable provisions of the City Code and Illinois Compiled Statutes; provided however, that the parties can only amend the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement if they first obtain the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”). This Agreement may be amended by the CITY and the owner of record of a portion of the SUBJECT PROPERTY as to provisions applying exclusively thereto, without the consent of the owner of other portions of the SUBJECT PROPERTY not affected by such Agreement; provided however, that the parties can only amend the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement if they first obtain the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”). Prior written consent of the Certificate Holder as described in the preceding two sentences shall no longer be required for an amendment to this Agreement if the Certificate Holder has received Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units as further described in Exhibit “H1” and Exhibit “A”. 8. Section 24. A is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: A. Third Party Beneficiary and Enforcement. The Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”) is a third party beneficiary to this Agreement with respect to the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement; provided, however, that the Certificate Holder will no longer be a third party beneficiary upon receipt of the Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units as further described in Exhibit “H1” and Exhibit “A”. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the Circuit Court of Kendall County by any of the parties or their successors or assigns and by the Certificate Holder, as a third party beneficiary by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the performance of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois. 9. Section 24 B. is amended by deleting the phrase “a empty lot or” in the last sentence of Section 24. B. -5- 10. Section 24 I. is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: I. Term of Agreement. The Term of this Agreement shall be twenty (20 years). In the event construction is commenced within said twenty year-period all of the terms of this Agreement shall remain enforceable despite said time limitation, unless modified by written agreement of the CITY and DEVELOPER/OWNERS; provided however that the CITY and DEVELOPER/OWNERS may not modify the Term of this Agreement with respect to the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY, Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder. 11. This Second Amendment shall be in full force and effect as of the date first written above. -6- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to the Original Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal Corporation By: _______________________________________ Mayor Attest: _________________________________ City Clerk GRANDE RESERVE (CHICAGO) ASLI VI, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership By: Avanti Properties Group II, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership, its general partner By: Avanti Management Corporation, a Florida corporation, its general partner By: Name: Andrew Dubill Title: Vice President Attest: __________________________________ -7- JOINDER OF COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 115 Yorkville Community Unit School District No. 115 (the “School District”) has executed this Second Amendment in order to confirm the School District agrees to be bound by the terms of this Second Amendment and if, or to the extent, any of the foregoing matters agreed to in this Second Amendment requires the consent of the School District in order for such agreements to be binding and enforceable in accordance with their terms, such consent is hereby given. “SCHOOL DISTRICT” COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 115 Yorkville, Illinois Date: ________________ By: _________________________________ Tim Shimp, Superintendent -8- EXHIBIT 1 LAND/CASH DONATION AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 13, 2004 See attached. -9- EXHIBIT 2 ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES See attached. STATE OF ILLINOIS ss. COUNTY OF KENDALL ) Ordinance No. 2009- ISy ORDINANCE APPROVING ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES FROM GRANDE RESERVE SUBDIVISION AND NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, on December 10, 2004, the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 (the "School District"), authorized the execution of a Debt Certificate in the amount of$4,685,960 to Castle Bank,N.A. (the"Debt Certificate")to provide funding to construct the new grade school to service the Grande Reserve Subdivision ("Grande Reserve") in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, i Illinois(the"City"); and, j WHEREAS, debt service on the Debt Certificate was payable solely from school transition fees collected pursuant to the City Code and certain annexation agreements in connection with the development of Grande Reserve and not from any other source; and, WHEREAS, as of June 1, 2009, there is an approximate balance due o the Debt Certificate of 3,750,000; however, there were insufficient funds available from said transition fees to pay all of the principal and interest due and owing as of said date; and, WHEREAS, Castle Bank, N.A. has requested assurances from the School District and the City that all future transition fees, in the current scheduled amounts, whether paid to the School District or the City be immediately forwarded directly to Castle Bank, N.A. to be applied by Castle Bank, N.A. toward the interest and principal due and owing on the Debt Certificate and the School District and the City believe that such assurances should be made to Castle Bank,N.A. as requested NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois that the Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees From Grande Reserve Subdivision, Yorkville, Illinois, by and between the Board of Trustees of Yorkville Community School District 115 and the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, and the Notice of Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees, Grande Reserve Subdivision, both documents being attached hereto as an Exhibit and being made a part hereof; are hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute said Assignment and Notice of Assignment and to direct that all transition fees collected by the City be immediately forwarded to Castle Bank, N.A. as required by said Assignment. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. i Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this 16- day of p geJ. ,A.D. 2009. ROBYN SUTCLIFF GEORGE GILSON,JR. ARDEN JOE PLOCHER C — DIANE TEELING I GARY GOLINSKI MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS WALLY WERDERICH APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this 161 day of C-/0 E2 ,A.D. 2009. QiAU2' :3 Mayor Attest: i C1 C 2 ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES FROM GRAND RESERVE SUBDIVISION,YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS WHEREAS, on December 10, 2004, the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 (the"School District"), authorized the execution of a Debt Certificate in the amount of$4,685,960 to Castle Bank,N.A. (the"Debt Certificate")to provide funding to construct the new grade school to service the Grand Reserve Subdivision ("Grand Reserve") in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois(the"City");and, WHEREAS, debt service on the Debt Certificate was payable solely from school transition fees collected pursuant to the City Code and certain annexation agreements in connection with the development of Grand Reserve and not from any other source; and, WHEREAS, as of June 1, 2009, there is an approximate balance due o the Debt Certificate of 3,750,000; however, there were insufficient funds available from said transition fees to pay all of the principal and interest due and owing as of said date; and, WHEREAS, Castle Bank, N.A. has requested assurances from the School District and the City that all future transition fees, in the current scheduled amounts, whether paid to the School District or the City be immediately forwarded directly to Castle Bank, N.A. to be applied by Castle Bank, N.A. towardI i the interest and principal due and owing on the Debt Certificate. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 and the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois,agree as follows: 1.All school transition fees incident to the development of the Grande Reserve in the current scheduled amounts required by the terms and provisions of certain annexation agreements to be received either by the School District or by the City shall be transferred directly to Castle Bank,N.A., as the registered owner of the Debt Certificate, or its successor, when and as received either by the School District or by the City. I 2.The School District and the United City of Yorkville hereby agree that neither the School District nor the United City of Yorkville shall make any agreements with the current mortgage holder or holders of mortgages against real estate situated in Grande Reserve or with the current owners of any portion of the real estate, or any future developers of the real estate, from which the transition fees are to be received,which will in any way reduce the amount of the transition fees,modify or amend the terms or mode of payment,without the express written consent of the Castle Bank,N.A. 3.The real estate affected by the pledge of transition fees is legally described in the ordinance annexing the properties comprising Grande Reserve and recorded as Document No. 200300032965 with the Kendall County Recorder of Deeds. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Notice of Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees on the day and date set opposite their respective signatures. COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 115 Yorkvil ois 1 Date: By: Dr. Thomas Engler, Sup tendent UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS Date: j 011c, O 9 By: Mayor Attest: I e V:\Castle.GrandReserve.Assigmnent.doc 2 STATE OF ILLINOIS SS COUNTY OF KENDALL ) NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES GRANDE RESERVE SUBDIVISION YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE is herewith given that, on December 15, 2004, Community Unit School District No. 115, Yorkville, Illinois, issued a certain Debt Certificate, Series 2004, in the Face Amount of 4,685,960.00, bearing interest as set forth in the Debt Certificate. CASTLE BANK, a National Association, maintaining one of its principal offices at 109 West Veterans Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois, is the Registered Owner of said Debt Certificate, Series 2004. The Debt Certificate is a special, limited obligation of the School District and is payable solely from transition fees paid to the District from developers and builders of residences in the Grande Reserve Subdivision, which revenues have been assigned and pledged to the payment of the Debt Certificate. The amount of said transition fees are set forth in and are established pursuant to the Ordinances of the United City of Yorkville and the terms and provisions of a certain Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement entered into by the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, with the developers of the Grande Reserve Subdivision. The real estate affected thereby and affected hereby is described in a certain Ordinance of the City entitled Ordinance No. 2003-45, ORDINANCE ANNEXING PROPERTIES OF MPI-2 YORKVILLE NORTH, L.L.C., MPI-2 YORKVILLE CENTRAL, L.L.C., AND MPI YORKVILLE SOUTH, L.L.C. (DEVELOPERS), SUBURBAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY TRUST #74-3216, ISENSTEIN-PASQUINELLI, L.L.C., MOSER ENTERPRISES, INC., INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P., DALE KONICEK AND WAYNE AND LOIS KONICEK OWNERS) TO THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS GRANDE RESERVE), filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds of Kendall County, Illinois, on September 11, 2003, as Document No. 200300032965. This Notice is made, given and recorded to confirm and memorialize the following: 1) All school transition fees incident to the development of the Grande Reserve Subdivision, Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, in the current scheduled amounts required by the terms and provisions of the Annexation Agreement received either by the School District or by the United City of Yorkville shall be paid directly to CASTLE BANK, N.A., the registered owner of the Debt Certificate, or its successor, when and as received either by the School District or by the City. 2) The School District and the United City of Yorkville have covenanted and agreed with CASTLE BANK, N.A., that neither the School District nor the United City of Yorkville will make any agreements with the current mortgage holder or holders of mortgages against real estate situated in the Grande Reserve Subdivision or with the current owners of any portion of the real estate, or any future developers of the real estate, from which the transition fees are to be received, which will in any way reduce the amount of the transition fees, modify or amend the terms or mode of payment, without the express written consent of the Bank. 3) Upon request, CASTLE BANK, N.A., or its successor, shall issue a Release in recordable form, evidencing the payment of the transition fee as to each lot in the Grande Reserve Subdivision when and as the transition fee, for each lot, is received by the Bank. J 4) The real estate affected by the pledge of transition fees is legally described in the Ordinance Annexing the properties comprising Grande Reserve Subdivision recorded as Document No. 200300032965. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Notice of Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees on the day and date set opposite their respective signatures. COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 115 Yorkville, Illinois BY: Date: Z d D . tliomas Engler, Superin ndent UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS BY: 2 Y -L-.'LI Date: Mayor Attest: Date: CpUr`l City Clerk CASTLE BANK,N.A. BY: Date: e— L c1 g! Stan Fre egional President U:I Castle.GrandeReserve.Notice.doc ILA' 301130(-:p0'2 :L (&C2 PREPARED BY & RETURN TO: tv: 4:3 10 tr.t _T tr: Thomas W. Grant KENDALL_ COUNTY, j:i_ Attorney at Law RECORDED: 10/7/2009 9:42 AM PO Box 326 NOT: 59.00 RHSPS FEE: 10.00 Yorkville, IL 60560 PAGES: 14 630) 553-0088 RECORDING COVER SHEET NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES GRANDE RESERVE SUBDIVISION YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS STATE OF ILLINOIS SS COUNTY OF KENDALL ) NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES GRANDE RESERVE SUBDIVISION YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE is herewith given that, on December 15, 2004, Community Unit School District No. 115, Yorkville, Illinois, issued a certain Debt Certificate, Series 2004, in the Face Amount of 4,685,960.00, bearing interest as set forth in the Debt Certificate. CASTLE BANK, a National Association, maintaining one of its principal offices at 109 West Veterans Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois, is the Registered Owner of said Debt Certificate, Series 2004. The Debt Certificate is a special, limited obligation of the School District and is payable solely from transition fees paid to the District from developers and builders of residences in the Grande Reserve Subdivision, which revenues have been assigned and pledged to the payment of the Debt Certificate. The amount of said transition fees are set forth in and are established pursuant to the Ordinances of the United City of Yorkville and the terms and provisions of a certain Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement entered into by the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, with the developers of the Grande Reserve Subdivision. The real estate affected thereby and affected hereby is described in a certain Ordinance of the City entitled Ordinance No. 2003-45, ORDINANCE ANNEXING PROPERTIES OF MPI-2 YORKVILLE NORTH, L.L.C., MPI-2 YORKVILLE CENTRAL, L.L.C., AND MPI YORKVILLE SOUTH, L.L.C. (DEVELOPERS), SUBURBAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY TRUST #74-3216, ISENSTEIN-PASQUINELLI, L.L.C., MOSER ENTERPRISES, INC., INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P., DALE KONICEK AND WAYNE AND LOIS KONICEK OWNERS) TO THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS GRANDE RESERVE), filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds of Kendall County, Illinois, on September 11, 2003, as Document No. 200300032965. This Notice is made, given and recorded to confirm and memorialize the following: 1) All school transition fees incident to the development of the Grande Reserve Subdivision, Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, in the current scheduled amounts required by the terms and provisions of the Annexation Agreement received either by the School District or by the United City of Yorkville shall be paid directly to CASTLE BANK, N.A., the registered owner of the Debt Certificate, or its successor, when and as received either by the School District or by the City. 2) The School District and the United City of Yorkville have covenanted and agreed with CASTLE BANK, N.A., that neither the School District nor the United City of Yorkville will make any agreements with the current mortgage holder or holders of mortgages against real estate situated in the Grande Reserve Subdivision or with the current owners of any portion of the real estate, or any future developers of the real estate, from which the transition fees are to be received, which will in any way reduce the amount of the transition fees, modify or amend the terms or mode of payment, without the express written consent of the Bank. 3) Upon request, CASTLE BANK, N.A., or its successor, shall issue a Release in recordable form, evidencing the payment of the transition fee as to each lot in the Grande Reserve Subdivision when and as the transition fee, for each lot, is received by the Bank. 4) The real estate affected by the pledge of transition fees is legally described in the Ordinance Annexing the properties comprising Grande Reserve Subdivision recorded as Document No. 200300032965. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Notice of Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees on the day and date set opposite their respective signatures. COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 115 Yorkville, Illinois BY: Date: Engler, ndent UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS BY: Date: Mayor Attest: Date:J'.0q IDEPur City Clerk CASTLE BAY,N.A. BY: Date: Stan UeK,Regional President Attached is a copy of the legal description for the subject real estate, derived from the Annexation Agreement. U 1 Castle.GrandeReserve.Notice.doc STEINBRECHER FARM B" Central Annexation Parcel PARCEL TWO: THAT PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 11 AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 442 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO,BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD;THENCE NO 75 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 1728 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LIN O E SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 0 SECO S ST 1001.25 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11 TO THE SO NER OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE NORTH 89 DEG S U SECONDS EAST 1339.5 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTI OUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF TI 11;THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 971.5 FE ENTERLINE OF THE HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 15 MINUTES V,,5EC S 727.2 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE;THENCE NORTH 79 DEGR 1 U SECONDS WEST 2877.4 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE CEN TH AND SOUTH HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 7 DEGREES 7 MINU S O ST 364.8 FEET ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID NORTH AND SOUTH HIG TH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 503.33 FEET TO TH T OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 0 SECOND O G SAID WEST LINE 1327.6 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;EXCEPT P SAID PARCEL LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LI E OF CHICAGO,BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRIS L, COUNTY,ILLINOIS. I N A n J 9„O A 2 O 4 p J .o A 1 INLAND" Annexation Parcel THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,THAT PART OF SECTION 14,AND THAT PART OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD WITH THE SOUTHERLY.LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILRO GHT-OF-WAY THROUGH SAID SECTION 14;THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 2 S ONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 1239.61 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF TH HWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14;THENCE NORTH 68 DEGRE>= 04 MIN 0 E NDS EAST,ALONG SAID NORTH LINE,610.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST N ORTHWEST QUARTER;THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 54 MINUTE ST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11 1 OF 1329.33 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAl QUARTER;THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WE L S ST LINE,611.01 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON AD;THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EA T, N OUTHERLY LINE,837.66 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF MILL ROAD;TH S DEGREES 18 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 546. T EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11;THENCE 0 REE 19 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE,556.17 FE S UTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;THENCE SOUTH 01 D UTES 08 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QU T R ID SECTION 14,A DISTANCE OF 1122.0 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 87 DEG 4 S 51 SECONDS WEST,438.0 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BDIVISION,EXTENSION FOUR;THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 45 MIN S E S WEST.ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID j LYNWOOD SUED N FOUR,1168.80 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;TH NC O EGREE 46 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE WESTERLY OF L O SUBDIVISION,EXTENSIONS FOUR AND FIVE,1173.80 FEET TO AN IRON TH E SOUTH 01 DEGREE 47 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE WESTERL F YNW000 SUBDIVISION,EXTENSION FIVE,376.25 FEET TO AN IRON STAKE:T OUTH 02 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINES OF LYNWOOD SUBDIVISION,EXTENSIONS FIVE AND SIX,1950.62 FEET TO AN IRON STAKE;THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 51 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LYNWOOD SUBDMSION,EXTENSION SIX,879.29 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF U.S.ROUTE NO.34;THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 47 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 878.60 FEET;THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST,2106.30 FEET;THENCE NORTH 47 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST,1500.85 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD AND THE EASTERNMOST CORNER OF A TRACT DESCRIBED IN A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO GEORGE AND GLENNA PATTERSON,HUSBAND AND WIFE,RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO.72-375 ON JANUARY 25,1972;THENCE NORTH 25 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 236.34 FEET;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY AND NORTHERLY,A RADIUS OF 800.0 FEET;AN ARC DISTANCE OF 419.10 FEET;THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 531.08 FEET;.THENCE NORTH 05 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 1866.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. ALSO:ALL THAT PART OF ROUTE 34,KENNEDY ROAD AND MILL ROAD ADJOINING SAID PARCEL. 7 U SON i KONICEK" Annexation Parcel PARCEL NO 1: THAT PART OF SECTIONS FOURTEEN(14),FIFTEEN(15)AND TWENTY-THREE(23),ALL IN TOWNSHIP THIRTY-SEVEN(37)NORTH,RANGE SEVEN(7)EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF STRUKEL'S PARADISE LAKE UNIT NO..1, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTS E OF BRISTOL ROAD AND THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD),AS SHOWN ON THE S SION PLAT OF STRUKEUS PARADISE LAKE UNIT NO.1 RECORDED AS DOCUME 1-215;THENCE NORTH 60 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST,724.86 FEET ENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF 94 0 IUS CURVE TO THE LEFT;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 631.18 FEET ALON HOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 43 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 4 O THEPOINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE;THENCE NORTH 27 D E 1 UTES 21 SECONDS EAST 11.57 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A lNT E UTH 37 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 1776.45 FEET TO A P H 52 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 1343.89 FEET TO A POI LINE OF BRISTOL ROAD;THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 0C N S 1778.85 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE POINT OF BEG N PARCEL NO.2: THAT PART OF SECTIONS FOU EN TWENTY-THREE(23),ALL IN TOWNSHIP THIRTY-SEVEN(37)NORTH,RA SISV N(7)EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: J COMMENCING AT E R CORNER OF STRUKEL'S PARADISE LAKE UNIT NO.1, i SAID POINT ALS B T I RSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BRISTOL ROAD AND THE CENTERL NE ROAD),AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAT OF STRUKEL'S DIS E IT NO.1,RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 971-215;THENCE SOUTH 37 DE S 39 UTES 00 SECONDS EAST 1776.85 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF BRISTOL RO E POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE NORTH 52 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 00 SE S EAST 1343.89 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE SOUTH 37 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 1645.23 FEET TO A POINT IN THE CENTERLINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 34;THENCE SOUTH 46 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST 1350.80 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 34 TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BRISTOL ROAD;THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 1781.63 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF BRISTOL ROAD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL N0.3: THAT PART OF SECTIONS FOURTEEN(14)AND TWENTY-THREE(23),ALL IN TOWNSHIP THIRTY-SEVEN(37),NORTH,RANGE SEVEN(7)EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF STRUKELS PARADISE LAKE UNIT NO.1, z A)SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENT-ERUNE OF BRISTOL ROAD AND F ATHECENTERLINEOFKENNEDYROAD),AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAT OF STRUKEUS PARADISE LAKE UNIT NO.1,RECORDED AS DOCUMENT#71-215;THENCE 1 NORTH 60 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST 724.86 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A 1094T2 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO n THE LEFT;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 631.18 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 43 DEGREES 46'MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 822.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE;THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST 11.57 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 27.DEGREES 15 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST 551.92 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A POINT;THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 15 SECON 9S-EAST-4s04.1*fEET_ ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE TO A POINT;THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 56 a SECONDS EAST 21 D4.69 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE TO A POINT IN THE CENTERLINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 34;THENCE SOUTH 46 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST 652.28 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERL.INE TO A POINT;THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 3421.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO:ALL THAT PART OF ROUTE 34,KENNEDY ROAD AND BRISTOL RIDGE ROAD ADJOINING SAID PARCELS. O O G a i f Y STEINBRECHER FARM A" Parcel for Zoning Map PARCEL ONE: THAT PART OF SECTIONS 15,22 AND 23,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 15 WITH THE TANGENT OF THE CENTERLINE TATE AID ROUTE 20 AS ESTABLISHED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 12, 195 DOCUMENT 125479; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID TANGENT 185.32 F CE SOUTH 17 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST TO T C R F SAID STATE AID ROUTE 20;THENCE SOUTH 17 DEGREES 20 M NOS EAST 1303.46 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE 1 EGREES 20 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 113.8 FEET;THENCE SOUT S 08 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 428.4 FEET;THENCE NORTH 17 G E S UTES 0 SECONDS WEST 1370.9 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE i TE 20;THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 0 SECON 10 CENTERLINE 25426 FEET TO A POINT 194.7 FEET EASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ERIC S D SION;THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERL F D ERICKSON'S SUBDIVISION,462 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY PARAL E CENTERLINE OF SAID ROAD 194.7 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF D B MSION;THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO TH CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION;THENCE WESTERLYALONG T Y LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND SAID LINE EXTENDED 178 . F T INT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF 1 5;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 0 SECONDS ST D WEST UNE 904 FEET;THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 03 MINUTES ON ST 1629 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 36 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EET;THENCE SOUTH 39 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 3776.7 F THE CENTERLINE OF U.S.ROUTE 34;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 1353 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF UNIT THREE,RIVER RIDGE;THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID UNIT THREE,RIVER RIDGE AND ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF UNIT TWO,RIVER RIDGE 2686 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID UNIT TWO,RIVER RIDGE;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID UNIT TWO,RIVER RIDGE AND ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF UNIT ONE,RIVER RIDGE 824.42 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF STATE AID ROUTE 20;THENCE NORTHWE§TERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 1886.5 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN NORTH 69 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 1084.7 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. EXCEPT FROM SAID PARCEL THAT PART LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STRUKEUS PARADISE LAKE UNIT 1;THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY 2 LINE OF SAID STRUKEL'S PARADISE LAKE UNIT 1,BEING THE CENTERLINE OF BRISTOL RIDGE ROAD,ON A BEARING OF NORTH 37 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST WHICH IS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF THIS LINE,A DISTANCE OF 215.76 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 47 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST 54.82 FEET;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 445.4-fF,1^T, -.AXINGA.._._„ CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 64 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 354.19 FEET;THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 36 SECONDS F WEST 49.79 FEET;THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST 33.60 FEET;THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 31.16 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 46 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 18.07 FEET;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 340.28 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 77 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 126.72 FM;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NOR T,HAVING A RADIUS OF 442.47 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORT REES 26 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 164.23 FE T;T H 53 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST 36.90 FEET;THE AR ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH,HAVING A 51 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 78 DEGREES 44 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 65.15 FEET;THENCE SO TH 05 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST 122.26 FEET;THENCE WEST ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE RADTOTHENORTH,HAVING A IUS HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 79 DEGREES 06 MIN TUT S O WEST,A DISTANCE OF 298.16 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG TH RVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 150.96 FE VI A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 86 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 36 S ST,A DISTANCE OF 122.05 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 16 MIN 3 CONDS WEST 45,04 FEET,THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 5 C DS WEST 135.54 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 04 MINUTE 1 S WEST 46.27 FEET;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A R VE TO THE NORTHWEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 165.37 FEET,HAVING ING OF SOUTH 78 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 25 SECONDS S , CE OF 144.66 FEET;THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 26 MINUTES CO ST 180.59 FEET;THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 38 E WEST 30.99 FEET;THENCE NORTH 50 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 59 SECONDS S .50 FEET,THENCE NORTH 82 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST 133.31 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST 67.58 FEET;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH,HAVING A RADIUS OF 188.30 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 166.22 FEET;THENCE NORTH 53 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST 69.55 FEET;THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 187.57 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 73 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 164.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST 112.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 21.13 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL,SAID POINT BEING 1,272.16 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD AS MEASURED ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE,FOR THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE. ALSO INCLUDING:ALL THAT PART OF BRISTOL RIDGE ROAD AND KENNEDY ROAD, ADJOINING SAID PARCEL,AND NOT PREVIOUSLY ANNEXED BY ANY MUNICIPAUTY. t t f i 0 TUCEK"Annexation Parcel THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2,PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11 AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION ENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF I ECT10N 12,99.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST 26 .2 EET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID. O 1 236.28 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWES U E NORTH 89 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST ALONG 236.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUAR ORT4489 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH 0 ORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11,2028.27 FEET TO THE NS S LY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 OF STORYBOOK HIGHLANDS,A S I SECTION 11;THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREE 06 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EA ENDED LINE 1030.0 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 37 S 239.40 FEET;THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREE 06 MINUTES 53 SECONOS TO THE CENTERLINE OF CANNONBALL TRAIL;THENCE NORTH 66 DEGREE 09 IN 20 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 898.31 FEET;THENC RLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE,BEING ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT IUS OF 2290.82 FEET,A DISTANCE OF 495.34 FEET;THENCE NORTH 53 DEG S INUTES EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 654.29 FEET TO THE EAST LINE O D N 2;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST ALONG ID E 262.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,IN THE TOWNSHIP OF B T A COUNTY,ILLINOIS. I ALSO:ALL THAT A L ROAD ADJOING SAID PARCEL.EXCEPT THEREFROM ANY r PART PREVI USL BY ANY MUNICIPALITY, A v iL f` I f! HANDKE" Annexation Parcel THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER 2029.92 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 5 OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTHER ALONG SAID AS FAST LINE 1469.90 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF MILL ROAD;THENCE ETERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 1039.40 FEET TO A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED T6,CbtAMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BY TRUSTEIES DEED RECORDED JUNE 28,1973 NT 73-3089;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 1 .36 EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;THENCE NORTHERLY ALO 1 E 1489.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP,KENDAL ILLINOIS. ALSO:ALL THAT PART OF MILL ROAD ADJOINING ID 0 1 G1 til F1 i STEINBRECHER FARM B" North Annexation Parcel PARCEL TWO: THAT PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 11 AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 442 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO,BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD;THENCE NO H 75 DEGREES 17 MINUTES D0SECONDSEAST1728FEETALONGSAID.RIGHT OF WAY LINT THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 0 SECO ST 1001.25 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF.SAID SECTION 11 TO THE SO C ER OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE NORTH 89 OEG ES 1 SECONDS EAST 1339.5 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SEC OUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF S i 11;THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 977.5 F NTERLINE OF THE HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 15 MINUTES EC DS 727.2 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE;THENCE NORTH 79IDEGR SECONDS WEST 2877.4 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE CEN E TH AND SOUTH HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 7 DEGREES 7 MIN S C EAST 364.8 FEET ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID NORTH AND SOUTH HIG A E RTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 503.33 FEET TO TH S OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 0 SECOND LO G SAID WEST LINE 1327.6 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING(EXCEPT 7 F RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAI OA ING THROUGH SECTION 11 AFORESAID AND ALSO EXCEPT THE FO LLO N BED PREMISES:THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NOR R OF SECTION 14,-TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THI P i L ERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I COMMENCIN AT ST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14;THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG'TH ST L E F ID SECTION 14,7.5 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SO H LY NG SAID WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 14,434.5 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE O 1 OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO,BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD;THEN ..75 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 876 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH RIGH OF WAY LINE TO THE CENTER OF THE BRISTOL-AURORA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 8 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 21211 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 7.5 FEET SOUTH OF AND NORMALLY DISTANT FROM THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14;THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 812.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF.SAID SECTION 14;THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 14,A DISTANCE OF 442.0 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD(FORMERLY THE CHICAGO,BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD);THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD A DISTANCE OF 876 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD,A DISTANCE OF 849.68 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14 BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD,A DISTANCE OF 2419.37 FEET TO". THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,A DISTANCE OF 197.04 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID LINE WITH A LINE DRAWN 190 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF,MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO,AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD; I THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE,A DISTANCE OF 3189.33 FEET THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11,BEING ALSO THE NORTH4JNEEOF SAIDSECTION 14; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALA-EL LINEE,,,/A DISTANCE OF i.M •r' 107.78 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD;THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ROAD,A DISTANCE OF 191.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING),IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. ALSO EXCEPT FROM SAID PARCEL THAT PART LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD. PARCEL THREE: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 1 ' PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 OF THE-THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SECTION LINE 79 OUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10(SAID POINT BEING IN THE CE ERRY CREEK);THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID E NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE•SOUTHEAST Q F ID SECTION 10;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 0 SEC S. ST L G SAID NORTH LINE 239 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE S k OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10;THENCE NO R MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EIGHTY LINE 638.3 FEET TO E THE ROAD;THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST AL . ERLINE OF SAID ROAD 304 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 38 MINUTES O ST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 451.7 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 DEGREES SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 600.7 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN P D 6$FEET WEST OF,AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES THERETO,THE SE N N ,THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 66 F G PARALLEL LINE 502.2 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTE EAST 393.33 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SCHOOL PROPERTY;T C U 7 EGREES 7 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST j LINE OF THE S 12 .8 FEET TO'THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE S S Q ER OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES ON T ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 342.33 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER O N HWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11; THENCE SOU REES 52 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SECTION LINE 1248.6 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING,IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL,KENDALL COUNTY,_ILLINOIS. ALSO:ALL THAT PART OF MILL ROAD,KENNEDY ROAD AND GALENA ROAD ADJOINING SAID PARCELS. l Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number PC #2 Tracking Number PC 2013-12 Prestwick of Yorkville (Yorkville Christian School) – Amended Annexation Agreement City Council – October 8, 2013 9-10-13 Discussion Majority Vote Request for amendment to an existing Annexation Agreement & Final Plat approval for a proposed new Christian high school. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department As indicated in the attached memorandum provided to the City Council dated September 18, 2013 and prepared for the September 24, 2013 meeting which was subsequently cancelled, staff facilitated a meeting in late August between the Petitioners, the Stewarts, and the adjoining property owners, the Blocks, to resolve concerns raised regarding drainage, traffic and accessory land uses. A summary of those issues and discussions is also detailed in that memo. Since that time, there has been progress made regarding specifics related to the permitted accessory land uses and to the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) related to Ashley Road; Ashley Road/Route 126; and Penman Road/Route 126. However, there has been an impasse between the Petitioners and the Blocks regarding the Ashley Road Offsite Storm Sewer. A recap of the Ashley Road Offsite Storm Sewer discussion is provided below. Ashley Road Offsite Storm Sewer Currently, Unit 1 and certain portions of Unit 2 of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision storm water management facilities are constructed. An existing 10” drain tile is located downstream of an existing basin east of the proposed school which drains along the west ditch of Ashley Road and eventually passes to the east side of the road . The existing 10” drain tile has recently been reconnected to the downstream field tile system so that all “low flow” discharges of storm water are carried below the surface to mimic the existing condition, while overland flows currently remain unchanged. In 2006, there were discussions between the previous developer and the Blocks to disconnect and abandon the use of the 10” drain tile and construct an offsite storm sewer as part of Unit 2 development. This proposed storm sewer would carry low flow storm water underground to alleviate any nuisance flows to adjacent tributary properties downstream . The offsite storm sewer will be designed to terminate at the grass waterway southwest of the property to an unnamed creek which flows to the Middle Aux Sable Creek. Staff fully supports the construction of the offsite storm sewer now, rather than upon final plat of Unit 2, which the Petitioner has agreed to complete. However, the construction of the offsite storm sewer would have required easements to be obtained from the Blocks to allow for the installation and future maintenance. Staff Comments: Since an amicable agreement could not be reached between the two parties concerning the offsite storm sewer, the Petitioners are now seeking alternative engineering options which will not require the use of the previously proposed offsite storm sewer down Ashley Road for the low flow but will still alleviate any nuisance flows to the adjacent properties downstream by alternate methods to match the existing runoff and release rate. Although the Petitioner has the right to discharge t he flows to the existing historical location, staff believes that the proposed re -engineering of the Petitioner’s site to hold additional storm water than required to accommodate adjoining properties is a positive demonstration by the Petitioner to address the concerns regarding previous and future drainage issues. Finally, for the purposes of Memorandum To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: October 3, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Request for Annexation Agreement Amendment & Final Plat approving the proposed amended annexation agreement and final plat, it is not required to have the final approved engineering completed related to the alternative drainage proposal at this time as adequate stormwater capacity is available now for the existing development and the proposed school development. Attachments: 1. Staff memorandum to City Council dated September 18, 2013 2. EEI Letter to the City dated October 2, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School 3. Ordinance Amended Annexation Agreement 4. Ordinance Sub Final Plat 5. Proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement from KFO (attached) 6. Ordinance 2005-30 Original Annexation Agreement 7. Exhibit A revised Legal Description 8. Exhibit B Final Plat - Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision date last revised 09/09/13 prepared by HR Green 9. Exhibit C Fee Sheet 10. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Exhibit illustrating the proposed removed 84 single-family lots marked “FOR REFERENCE ONLY” dated 07/2/13 prepared by HR Green. 11. Overall Master Plan – Bubble Plan, dated 08-22-13, prepared by HR Green 12. Yorkville Christian School – Vicinity Plan by HR Green 13. EEI Letter to the City dated July 23, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 1 14. EEI Letter to the City dated July 29, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan review No. 1 – Additional Comments 15. EEI Letter to the City dated August 14, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Plat Review No. 2 16. EEI Letter to the City dated September 5, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan review No. 2 17. EEI Letter to the City dated September 18, 2013 re: Final Plat Review 18. Memorandum from Director of Parks and Recreation to City Council dated August 8, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Subdivision. 19. Petitioner’s Appraisal Report dated August 20, 2013 prepared by Krueger Appraisal Services, Inc. 20. Land Valuation Study For: Cash Contribution in-Lieu-of Site Dedication United City of Yorkville, Illinois dated May 1, 2012 prepared by David W. Phillips & Company. 21. Traffic Impact Study dated August 28, 2013, prepared by KLOA 22. Revised Traffic Impact Study dated September 18, 2013, prepared by KLOA 23. Revised Traffic Impact Study dated September 25, 2013, prepared by KLOA 24. Storm Sewer Design Report latest revision dated August 22, 2013 prepared by HR Green 25. Route 129 Improvements plans, dated 08-26-08, prepared by HR Green 26. Ashley Offsite Storm Sewer plans, dated 02-17-06, prepared by HR Green previously approved by City and County. 27. Ashley Road Easements, dated 08-23-06, prepared by HR Green 28. Landscape Plans dated 08-22-13, prepared by Hitchcock Design Group. 29. Staff memo to City Council dated August 21, 2013 re: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Public Hearing for Annexation Agreement Amendment Request 30. Staff memo to City Council dated September 5, 2013 re: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School request for Annexation Agreement Amendment & Final Plat 31. Staff memo to City Council dated September 5, 2013 re: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Final Plat Approval 32. Copy of Petitioners’ Amended Annexation Agreement Application w/attachments 33. Copy of Petitioners’ Final Plat Application w/attachments At the direction of the City Council during the August 27, 2013 meeting, staff facilitated a meeting between the Petitioners, John and Michelle Stewart, and the neighboring property owner to the east and south, the Blocks, on September 16th to discuss the items regarding the proposed private Christian high school brought before the council by the Blocks’ attorney. During that meeting, attorneys, engineers and legal counsel for the Petitioner, the Blocks and the City were present. The following is a summary of the issues discussed: Ashley Road Offsite Storm Sewer Currently, Unit 1 and certain portions of Unit 2 of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision storm water management facilities are constructed. An existing 10” drain tile is located downstream of an existing basin east of the proposed school which drains along the west ditch of Ashley Road and eventually passes to the east side of the road . The existing 10” drain tile has recently been reconnected to the downstream field tile system so that all “low flow” discharges of storm water are carried below the surface, while overland flows currently remain unchanged. In 2006, there were discussions between the previous developer and the Blocks to disconnect and abandon the use of the 10” drain tile and construct an offsite storm sewer as part of Unit 2 development. This proposed storm sewer would carry low flow storm water under ground to alleviate any overland nuisance flows to adjacent tributary properties downstream. The offsite storm sewer will be designed to terminate at the grass waterway southwest of the property to an unnamed creek which flows to the Middle Aux Sable Creek. Staff fully supports the construction of the offsite storm sewer now, rather than upon final plat of Unit 2, which the Petitioner has agreed to complete. However, the construction of the offsite storm sewer will require easements to be obtained from the Blocks to allow for the installation and future maintenance. At the conclusion of the meeting on September 16th, the proposed width of the easement was still being negotiated between the Blocks and the Petitioner. Should the petitioner and the Blocks not reach a resolution with regards to the easement dedication, the Petitioner has the right to discharge the flows to the existing historical location. It is staff’s opinion that the finalization of the easement dedication should not hinder the approval of the proposed final plat of subdivision or amended annexation agreement. Traffic Impact Study As proposed, there are three (3) roadway and intersection improvements to be constructed as part of the Yorkville Christian School subdivisi on - Ashley Road; Ashley Road/Route 126; and Penman/Route 126. Per the meeting on September 16th, all parties agreed that the following improvements are appropriate and sufficient to address the increased traffic associated with the proposed new school land use: Ashley Road – improvements to this township roadway will include a right turn lane into the subdivision with a City recommended speed reduction on Ashley Road along the subdivision’s frontage from 55 mph to 45 mph due to the anticipated traffic and vehicular Memorandum To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: September 18, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Request for Annexation Agreement Amendment & Final Plat trips generated from the school land use. Other roadway improvements include milling and resurfacing of Ashley. Ashley will have a rural cross section with minimum 11’ drive lines for a total 22 feet wide section from edge to edge with 2’-0” wide aggregate shoulders. Ashley Road/ Route 126 – per IDOT’s preliminary comments, westbound left turn lanes and eastbound right turn lanes are now proposed for this intersection. A revised traffic impact study has been prepared by KLOA regarding the recommended turn lanes on Route 126. Ashley Road at the intersection at Route 126 will also have a northbound left turn lane and northbound right turn lane. Approximately, 2,800 square foot triangular section of proposed IDOT right-of-way would need to be dedicated by the Blocks for the identified Ashley Road improvements. This commitment was presented to the Blocks during the meeting as a necessity to meet the State’s roadway requirements and address the safety concerns expressed by the Blocks themselves. Penman Road/Route 126 – per IDOT’s preliminary comments, a westbound left-turn lane will be provided on Route 126 at the intersection of Penman and an eastbound right turn lane as well as the separate northbound left and northbound right turn lanes on Penman similar to the Ashley Road/Route 126 improvements. Although the traffic impact study plans for full build -out of the proposed school and residential subdivision as part of the ultimate traffic improvements along Route 126, the petitioner plans to make the improvements immediately during the 2014 construction season prior to the occupancy permit for the school so that the surrounding areas are impacted less by the initial influx of the school’s students. The City also intends to withhold occupancy of any residential building permit until the completion of the required roadway improvements, per IDOT’s prior request. The full construction of the roadway improvements and enhancements to Route 126 will also aid in providing additional safety measures to this corridor. Accessory/Ancillary Uses The permitted accessory uses proposed by the Petitioner as part of the Yorkville Christian School facility, equestrian/riding arena and retail store, have been more defined in the language within the draft Amended Annexation Agreement. As now proposed, these accessory/ancillary uses will read: Retail store, not to exceed 3,000 sq. ft. to be located completely within the school building; selling school supplies, plants and produce grown on the property, and spirit wear. Plants and produce may be sold seasonally outside. Equestrian/riding arena; temporary stabling used solely for intramural and extramural sports and tournaments defined as programming between students of the Yorkville Christian School and other high schools in sanctioned division, region, state or national competitions. All such ancillary and accessory uses are limited to those stated a bove and are subject to the current United City of Yorkville zoning regulations. Additional Revisions to Amended Annexation Agreement Per the discussion at the August 27, 2013 City Council meeting, the following additional revisions to the draft amended annexation agreement have been addressed: 1. Final Plat: The petitioner has submitted a revised Final Plat of Subdivision plan which satisfactorily completes the comments No.# 60-63 prepared by the City Engineer, EEI, provided in a letter dated September 5, 2013. 2. Park Site: The Petitioners have agreed to construct a paved area at a size and in a location of the City’s choosing to accommodate vehicular parking and receive credit for such an improvement against the land cash contribution upon evidence of paid invoices for the actual cost of construction. 3. Fees and Charges: The attached revised fee sheet (Exhibit C) for the new Ashley Pointe Subdivision reflects a water connection fee of $3,700, the current rate for a single family home. 4. Land Cash: Per the direction of the City Council, the revised valuation of an improved acre of land for the residential portion of the proposed Ashley Pointe subdivision will be $30,000 based upon review of the Petitioner’s Land Appraisal study and the City’s recent appraisal of land value in the Yorkville area completed in 2012. a. The fees for Unit 1 will be paid per the current land-cash ordinance at one-third (1/3) within 30 days of City’s invoice, one-third (1/3) due one year from City Council approval, and one-third (1/3) due two years from City Council approval. b. The timing for Unit 2 payment of land cash will follow the current ordinance requirement of 1/3 at final plat of approval, 1/3 at time of first occupancy, and 1/3 due at time of infrastructure acceptance. Staff Comments: Staff believes that the meeting between the petitioner and adjoining neighbor was fruitful in the discussion regarding off site storm sewer and traffic improvements. The outstanding items to be negotiated between the two parties, easement acquisition for storm sewer and roadway dedication for future right-of-way, should not impede the City’s ability to vote on the proposed final plat of subdivision or amended annexation agreement. Furthermore, the additional language provided to the draft agreement relating to the accessory/ancillary uses on the school property clearly defines the limitations of these activities on the site. Attachments: 1. Ordinance Amended Annexation Agreement 2. Ordinance Sub Final Plat 3. Proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement from KFO (attached) 4. Ordinance 2005-30 Original Annexation Agreement 5. Exhibit A revised Legal Description 6. Exhibit B Final Plat - Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision date last revised 09/09/13 prepared by HR Green 7. Exhibit C Fee Sheet 8. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Exhibit illustrating the proposed removed 84 single-family lots marked “FOR REFERENCE ONLY” dated 07/2/13 prepared by HR Green. 9. Overall Master Plan – Bubble Plan, dated 08-22-13, prepared by HR Green 10. Yorkville Christian School – Vicinity Plan by HR Green 11. EEI Letter to the City dated July 23, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 1 12. EEI Letter to the City dated July 29, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan review No. 1 – Additional Comments 13. EEI Letter to the City dated August 14, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Plat Review No. 2 14. EEI Letter to the City dated September 5, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan review No. 2 15. EEI Letter to the City dated September 18, 2013 re: Final Plat Review 16. Memorandum from Director of Parks and Recreation to City Council dated August 8, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Subdivision. 17. Petitioner’s Appraisal Report dated August 20, 2013 prepared by Krueger Appraisal Services, Inc. 18. Land Valuation Study For: Cash Contribution in-Lieu-of Site Dedication United City of Yorkville, Illinois dated May 1, 2012 prepared by David W. Phillips & Company. 19. Traffic Impact Study dated August 28, 2013, prepared by KLOA 20. Revised Traffic Impact Study dated September 18, 2013, prepared by KLOA 21. Storm Sewer Design Report latest revision dated August 22, 2013 prepared by HR Green 22. Route 129 Improvements plans, dated 08-26-08, prepared by HR Green 23. Ashley Offsite Storm Sewer plans, dated 02-17-06, prepared by HR Green previously approved by City and County. 24. Ashley Road Easements, dated 08-23-06, prepared by HR Green 25. Landscape Plans dated 08-22-13, prepared by Hitchcock Design Group. 26. Staff memo to City Council dated August 21, 2013 re: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Public Hearing for Annexation Agreement Amendment Request 27. Staff memo to City Council dated September 5, 2013 re: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School request for Annexation Agreement Amendment & Final Plat 28. Staff memo to City Council dated September 5, 2013 re: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Final Plat Approval 29. Copy of Petitioners’ Amended Annexation Agreement Application w/attachments 30. Copy of Petitioners’ Final Plat Application w/attachments Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2013-_____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT OF YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT – PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION (Yorkville Christian School) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the “City”) is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City and John and Michelle Stewart (the “Owner”), as successors to the original owners, desire to amend the Annexation Agreement, to provide for the resubdivision of Lot 358 for a private high school, amend the required donations and contributions and seek exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the Mayor and City Council (the “Corporate Authorities”) on the amended annexation agreement on August 27, 2013, and all notices required by law have been given by the City and Owner; and, WHEREAS, the statutory procedures provided in Section 11-15.1-1 of the Illinois Municipal Code for the execution of the amended annexation agreement have been fully complied with; and, WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have concluded that the approval and execution of the proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement is in the best interests of the health, safety, and welfare of the City. WHEREAS, the City and Owner desire to proceed in accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth in the First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2: The First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development and the City of Yorkville (Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision) attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A is hereby approved; and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver same. Section 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this ________ day of ____________________, 2013. ______________________________ CITY CLERK Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 2 ROSE ANN SPEARS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ CARLO COLOSIMO ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ LARRY KOT ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of _______________ 2013. ______________________________ MAYOR Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2013-_____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, APPROVING THE RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 358 OF THE PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT 1 FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION (YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SUBDIVISION) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the “City”) is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, John and Michelle Stewart (the “Petitioner”) have filed an application and petition for approval of the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision for the subdivision of Lot 358 in Prestwick of Yorkville, Unit 1, an approximately 32 acre property for a private high school; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission convened and held a public hearing on the 25th day of July, 2013, to consider the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision after publication of notice and notice to property owners within five hundred (500) feet of the Subject Property; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission reviewed the standards set forth in Chapter 3 and 4 of Title 11 of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance and made a recommendation to the Mayor and City Council (“the Corporate Authorities”) for approval of the subdivision and the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2: That the Corporate Authorities hereby approve the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision, prepared by HR Green last revised September 9, 2013 attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A; subject to final engineering plans to be approved by the City’s Engineer and with such amendments as are required pursuant to the City’s Engi neer’s letter dated October 2, 2013, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B; and authorize the Mayor, City Clerk, City Administrator and City Engineer to execute said Plat. Section 3: The City Clerk is hereby authorized pursuant to Section 11-2-3.H of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance to file a copy of this ordinance and Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision with the Kendall County Recorder of Deeds within 30 days from the date of the approval of this Ordinance. Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 2 Section 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this ________ day of ____________________, A.D. 2013. ______________________________ CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ CARLO COLOSIMO ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ LARRY KOT ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of _______________ 2013. ______________________________ MAYOR 157226/3 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SS COUNTY OF KENDALL ) FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT OF YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT AND THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION) This First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement (the “AMENDMENT”), is made and entered into this day of , 2013, by and between the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, a municipal corporation (the “CITY”), and the owner of record John C. Stewart and Michelle L. Stewart, (“OWNER” or “DEVELOPER” or “OWNER/DEVELOPER”). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, OWNER owns fee simple title to the real property which is legally described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, consisting of approximately 190 acres, more or less (hereinafter “PROPERTY”); WHEREAS, on April 26, 2005, the CITY annexed and zoned the PROPERTY in an R-2 Single Family Residence District in accordance with the terms of the “Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development and The United City of Yorkville” (“AGREEMENT”); WHEREAS, the original owner and developer under the Agreement was unable to complete the development of the PROPERTY; WHEREAS, the Final Plat for Unit 1 of the Property was recorded and the improvements required under Unit 1 were substantially completed; WHEREAS, the Final Plat for Unit 2 was not recorded; WHEREAS, the OWNER/DEVELOPER subsequently acquired the PROPERTY, described in Exhibit “A” to the AMENDMENT; WHEREAS, the OWNER/DEVELOPER desires to amend the AGREEMENT to provide for a re-subdivision of Lot 358 for a private high school; amend the donations and contributions; and seek other exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance; WHEREAS, R-2 Zoning under the CITY’s ordinances allows for a school as a permitted use; 157226/3 2 WHEREAS, all notices required by law relating to this AMENDMENT have been given to the persons or entities entitled thereto, pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the CITY have duly fixed the time for a public hearing on this AMENDMENT and pursuant to legal notice have held such hearing thereon all as required by the provisions of the Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have duly held all public hearings relating to AMENDMENT all as required by the provisions of the CITY’s Ordinances and Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, in accordance with the powers granted to the CITY by the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-1 through 15.1-5 (2002), inclusive, relating to annexation agreements, the parties hereto wish to enter into this binding AMENDMENT of the AGREEMENT and to provide for various other matters related directly or indirectly to amending the annexation of the PROPERTY, as authorized by, the provisions of said statutes; WHEREAS, pursuant to due notice and publication in the manner provided by law, the Plan Commission of the CITY have had such public hearing and have taken all further action required by the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15-1.3 (2002) and the ordinances of the CITY relating to the procedure for authorization, approval and execution of the subdivision of Lot 358 by the CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements and conditions herein contained, and by authority of and in accordance with the aforesaid statutes of the State of Illinois, the parties agree as follows: 1. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT. OWNER has filed with the Clerk of the CITY a duly and properly executed Application to Amend Annexation Agreement pursuant to, and in accordance with the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/7-1-1 et seq. (2002). CITY agrees to adopt any necessary ordinances to amend the AGREEMENT as soon as reasonably practical. To the extent there is a conflict between the terms of the AMENDMENT and the AGREEMENT, the terms of the AMENDMENT shall control. 2. ZONING. That said paragraph be amended as follow: A. PROPERTY shall be developed in substantial compliance with the ordinances of the CITY in effect at the time of passage of this AMENDMENT to AGREEMENT except as modified by said AMENDMENT. B. The CITY shall approve the revised final plat of subdivision of Lot 358 in Prestwick of Yorkville, Unit 1, prepared by HR Green dated July 2, 2013, last revised September 9, 2013, attached hereto as Exhibit B. 157226/3 3 3. Paragraph 5 DONATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONS. be amended as follows: A. DEVELOPER shall receive a credit against all City and County road impact fees for the improvements by the DEVELOPER to Il Route 126 at Penman Road, Ashley Road and Route 126 intersection and Ashley Road improvements adjacent to the PROPERTY. B. DEVELOPER shall pay revised school and park land-cash fees or provide land dedication as required under the terms of this AMENDMENT and Exhibit C attached hereto. 4. Paragraph 6 SECURITY INVESTMENTS. Amend by providing an additional paragraph to read as follows: OWNER/DEVELOPER has provided CITY with a Subdivision Bond for the Prestwick Subdivision in the amount of One-Million Eight-Hundred Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Eighty-Four and 00/100’s Dollars ($1,879,684.00). CITY agrees to reduce said bond so as not to bond for street parkway/trees and public side-walk improvements. CITY agrees to instead obtain any surety needed for such improvements from the builder of the home on each lot. Developer will provide any required security for the high school improvements, including roadways. 5. Paragraph 9 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCES. Amend to read as follows: CITY agrees to amend the five (5) years where referenced throughout said paragraph to ten (10) years, said ten (10) years commencing from the approval date of this AMENDMENT. 6. Paragraph 11 FEES AND CHARGES. Shall be revised as follows: Notwithstanding the provisions of the AGREEMENT the fees due and owing to the CITY for those fees and amounts shall be set forth in the revised Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part of this AMENDMENT. The Owner acknowledges that the donations contained in this Agreement, and the City Code, are made voluntarily by the OWNER, and the OWNER hereby waives for itself and its successors and assigns the right to contest at any time in the future, the validity or the amount of the donations. 7. Paragraph 18 NOTICES AND REMEDIES. Shall be amended as follows: City Attorney: Kathleen Field-Orr & Associates 53 W. Jackson Boulevard, Suite 964 Chicago, Illinois 60604 157226/3 4 Developer: John C. Stewart and Michelle L. Stewart 3874 N. IL Route 71 Sheridan, IL 60118 Developer Attorney: John F. Philipchuck Dommermuth, Cobine, West, Gensler, Philipchuck, Corrigan and Bernhard, Ltd. 111 E. Jefferson Ave., Suite 200 Naperville, IL 60540 Telephone: 630-355-5800 Facsimile: 630-355-5976 8. Paragraph 22 GENERAL PROVISIONS. H. Term of Agreement Shall be amended as follows: The term of this AGREEMENT shall be twenty (20) years. In the event that a permit for construction is issued within said twenty-year period all of the terms of this AGREEMENT for that permit shall remain enforceable despite said time limitation, unless modified by written agreement of the CITY and OWNER/DEVELOPER. 9. Add an additional paragraph 24. SCHOOL PROPERTY. OWNER/DEVELOPER intends to develop the re-subdivided Lot 358 to accommodate an approximately 32 acre site for a private high school. CITY agrees that the existing R-2 One-Family Residence allows as a permitted use schools; including denominational or private, elementary and high, including playgrounds, garages for school buses and athletic fields. In addition, the C ITY agrees to permit the following accessory and auxiliary uses all as permitted uses: Retail store, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, to be located completely within the school building and selling school supplies, plants and produce grown on the property, and spirit wear. Plants and produce may be sold seasonally outside. Equestrian/riding arena; temporary stabling used solely for intramural and extramural sports and tournaments defined as programs between the students of Yorkville Christian School and other high schools in sanctioned division, region, state or national competitions Electronic scoreboard; permanent and temporary sponsor signage; athletic field lighting; outdoor public address system Outdoor parking and storage of farming machinery; grain bins; greenhouses Concession/restroom buildings serving outdoor athletic venues Perpendicular street parking along Mustang Way serving the athletic fields School bus parking and garage 157226/3 5 All such ancillary and accessory uses are limited to those stated above and are subject to the United City of Yorkville zoning regulations. 10. Add an additional paragraph 25. PARKING FOR HIGH SCHOOL. CITY recognizes that the enrollment of the high school student population will increase slowly over time, therefore CITY agrees to allow the school to open with forty percent (40%) of the required parking in place and the remaining sixty p ercent (60%) to be land banked and installed as determined by the CITY. 11. Add an additional paragraph 26. DEVELOPMENT NAME CHANGE. CITY agrees to allow OWNER/DEVELOPER to change the name of the development to Ashley Pointe. 12. Add an additional paragraph 27. SITE DEVELOPMENT. CITY agrees to issue a site development permit to the DEVELOPER prior to final engineering approval, for mass grading work on the PROPERTY. CITY further agrees to issue, upon submittal and approval of the proper plans, a building foundation only permit on the proposed School Property. 13. Add an additional paragraph 28. PARK SITE DEVELOPER agrees to construct a paved area at a size, and in a location of the CITY’S choosing to accommodate vehicular parking on Lot 359, the future Park Site. DEVELOPER shall be given a credit against remaining park fees owed the CITY for the PROPERTY after the lot 359 Park Site dedication. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands on this day of . 2013. CITY: OWNER/DEVELOPER: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE JOHN C. STEWART AND MICHELLE L. STEWART By: _______________________________ _________________________________ Mayor John C. Stewart Attest: ____________________________ _________________________________ City Clerk Michelle L. Stewart 157226/3 6 Prepared By: John F. Philipchuck Dommermuth, Cobine, West, Gensler, Philipchuck, Corrigan and Bernhard, Ltd. 111 E. Jefferson Ave., Suite 200 Naperville, IL 60540 630-355-5800 157226/3 7 EXHIBIT INDEX TO THE AMENDMENT EXHIBIT A REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT B FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT C FEES 157226/3 8 157226/3 9 157226/3 10 157226/3 11 157226/3 12 EXHIBIT C ASHLEY POINTE FEES PER UNIT A paid receipt from the School District Office, 602-A Center Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois, must be presented to the City prior to issuance of permit $3,000.00 Separate Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District fee – made payable to Y.B.S.D. $1,400.00 United City of Yorkville Fees 1. Building Permit Cost $650.00 plus $0.20 per square foot $650+$0.20(SF) 2. Water Connection Fees SF and DU $3,700 2+ Bed Att N/A 3. Water Meter Cost Detached Units $ 475 Attached Unit N/A 4. City Sewer Connection Fees $2,000 5. Water and Sewer Inspection Fee $ 25 6. Public Walks/Driveway Inspection Fee $ 35 7. Development Fees Public Works $ 700 Police $ 300 Building $ 150 Library (see note “d” below) $500 * $250 Parks & Recreation $50 Engineering $100 Bristol-Kendall Fire (see note “c” below) $1000 * $500 8. School Fees (see note “a” below) a. School Fee payments are estimates based upon projected residential lot numbers and shall be recalculated based upon the total number of residential lots that are final platted. 157226/3 13 9. All Road Contributions N/A; to be satisfied by improvements to Penman/Rt. 126; Ashley Road/Rt. 126; and Ashley Road Improvements 10. Weather Warning Siren Fee (see note “b” below) $ 75/acre 11. Park Fees. a. Value per acre – $30,000 b. Acres required: 10.05 total acres 6.67 acres dedicated 3.38 acres unsatisfied This acreage is based upon current projected residential lot numbers and shall be recalculated based upon the total number of residential lots that are final platted. c. Actual cost of paving parking lot as evidenced by paid invoices shall be deducted from total amount due. d. (i) Payment of one-third (1/3) of the amount due after credit for parking lot paving shall be due within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from the City; (ii) Payment of one-third (1/3) shall be due on the one year anniversary of the date of approval of this First Amendment by the City Council; and, (iii)Final one-third (1/3) payment shall be due on the second year anniversary of the date of approval of this First Amendment by the City Council. Notes: a. School fees are $1,792.68 per lot, payable at building permit. b. $75/acre x 193.81 = $14,535. $54.25/lot payable at building permit. c. 50% of BKFD fee for Unit 1 paid ($52,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1, (104) pay $500/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay $1,000/lot at building permit. d. 50% of library fee for Unit 1 paid ($26,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1 (104) pay $250.00/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay $500/lot at building permit. 157226/3 14 157226/3 15 157226/3 16 PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: UNIT ONE: LOTS 1 TROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 12 TROUGH 41, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 43 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 52 THROUGH 63, INCLUSIVE, LOT 65 THROUGH 108, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 357 THROUGH 363, INCLUSIVE, AND LOT 365 IN PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 3 & 10, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 31, 2006, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200600035287, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. UNIT 2: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 10, 1776.14 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 258.23 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 38 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 269.09 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 68 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 262.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST, 0.59 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 54 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 35.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 70.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 265.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 14 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 0.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 145.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, 37.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 116.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST, 153.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 112.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 111.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 55.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 90.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST, 85.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST, 238.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, 13.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 288.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 127.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 267.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 22 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 46.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 216.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 02 SECONDS EAST, 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 86.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 72.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 71.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST, 71.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 77.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, 87.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 106.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 52.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST, 84.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 74.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, 1006.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS CONVEYED TO ROBERT M. AND ELAINE E. STEWART BY DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LANDS PER DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656, 2655.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS PER DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, AND 1876.91 FEET SOUTHERLY OF (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID WEST LINE) THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 10, 1876.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF KENDALL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND CONTAINING 110.29 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS. S01°27'28"E 202.68' S8 8 ° 3 2 ' 3 2 " W 40 . 0 3 ' L= 3 9 . 2 7 ' R = 2 5 . 0 0 ' CB = N 4 6 ° 2 7 ' 2 3 " W C H = 3 5 . 3 6 ' S8 8 ° 3 2 ' 3 6 " W 94 . 6 5 ' L= 1 1 2 . 3 2 ' R = 3 8 5 . 0 0 ' CB = N 8 3 ° 0 5 ' 5 7 " W C H = 1 1 1 . 9 2 ' L= 2 9 . 4 6 ' R = 2 5 . 0 0 ' CB = S 7 1 ° 2 9 ' 4 6 " W C H = 2 7 . 7 9 ' L = 3 4 0 . 2 7 ' R = 3 3 3 . 0 0 ' C B = S 6 7 ° 0 0 ' 2 6 " W C H = 3 2 5 . 6 6' N8 3 ° 4 3 ' 1 0 " W 2 8 6 . 2 5 ' L = 2 7 2 . 0 0 ' R = 9 6 7 . 0 0 ' C B = S 8 8 ° 13 ' 2 0 " W C H = 2 71.11' S 8 0 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 2 4 3 . 9 4 ' L=571.20'R=333.00'CB=N50°41'46"WCH=503.70'N01°33'23"W 227.23'L =3 6 1 .3 8 'R =7 1 7 .0 0 'C B =N 1 5 °5 9 '4 4 "W C H =3 5 7 .5 7 'N30°26'05"W 174.10'L =2 6 1 .1 9 'R =3 3 5 .0 0 'C B =N 8 °0 5 '5 6 "W C H =2 5 4.62'70.00'S75°45'48"E L=142.07' R=265.00'CB=N29°35'43"E CH=140.38'38.46'N41°58'22"E 113.75'N44°57'14"E L=39.27' R=25.00'CB=N89°57'14"E CH=35.36'S44°57'14"W150.00'102.54'S49°49'48"E80.00'S55°49'25"E94.23'S64°04'50"E257.25'S62°30'12"E 10 0 . 1 5 ' S6 8 ° 1 1 ' 2 3 " E 11 7 . 5 5 ' S8 4 ° 0 3 ' 4 4 " E S28°1 5 ' 0 3 " E 1 9 3 . 1 1 ' 1 1 9 . 6 5 ' N 7 7 ° 4 6 ' 2 8 " E 1 1 9 . 6 5 ' N 5 7 ° 2 6 ' 4 6 " E 12 5 . 3 6 ' N3 6 ° 3 7 ' 3 7 " E L =2 6 7 .4 0 'R =3 3 3 .0 0 ' CB=S 5 °14 '4 7 "E C H =2 6 0 .2 7 ' 107.6 6 'N22° 3 8 ' 1 7 " E 120.97' N13°40'0 6 " E L= 4 2 . 6 8 ' R = 2 5 . 0 0 ' CB = S 3 1 ° 0 8 ' 5 4 " E C H = 3 7 . 6 8 ' 6 6 . 0 0 ' N 7 2 ° 4 1 ' 2 3 " E S8 4 ° 3 5 ' 3 7 " E 1 3 3 . 2 2 ' L=313.54'R=267.00' CB=S50°57'07"E CH=295.83' L= 3 9 . 2 7 ' R = 2 5 . 0 0 ' CB = N 4 3 ° 3 2 ' 3 7 " E C H = 3 5 . 3 6 ' L=165.9 7 'R =3 3 3 .0 0 ' CB=S3°01'5 7 "E C H =1 6 4 .2 5 ' 82 . 6 5 ' N0 1 ° 2 6 ' 1 8 " W S11°14'44" W 1 5 6 . 8 6 ' L =3 2 1 .9 2 'R =4 6 7 .0 0 ' C B =S 8 °3 0 '1 0 "E C H =3 15 .5 9 ' N8 8 ° 3 2 ' 3 6 " E 9 4 . 6 5 ' L= 6 2 . 6 9 ' R = 3 1 5 . 0 0 ' CB = S 8 5 ° 4 5 ' 2 0 " E C H = 6 2 . 5 8 ' 74 . 6 6 ' N0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " W 74 . 6 6 ' N0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " W 74 . 6 6 ' N0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " W 40 . 0 0 ' N8 8 ° 2 8 ' 0 9 " E 74 . 6 6 ' N0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " W 74 . 6 6 ' N0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " W Illinois Professional Design Firm # 184-001322 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 t. 630.553.7560 f. 630.553.7646 www.hrgreen.com 1 O F 2 5455565758 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 35 7 359 PRESTWICKLANECALL A N D E R T R A I L DE N O T E S A R E A H E R E B Y D E D I C A T E D TO T H E U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E FO R P U B L I C R I G H T - O F - W A Y A N D UT I L I T Y P U R P O S E S . WH I T E K I R K LA N E 358 35 8 358MUSTANG WAY MU S T A N G WA Y WHITEK I R K L A N E MU S T A N G W A Y LO T 2 LO T 1 35 8 *S E E N O T E 9 DE N O T E S 5 / 8 " I R O N R O D F O U N D DE N O T E S 5 / 8 " I R O N R O D S E T FOR REVIEW 74 . 6 8 ' S0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " E Illinois Professional Design Firm # 184-001322 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 t. 630.553.7560 f. 630.553.7646 www.hrgreen.com 2 O F 2 PI N s : P T . 0 5 - 1 0 - 2 0 0 - 0 0 7 05 - 1 0 - 2 7 7 - 0 0 1 FO R R E V I E W 157226/3 12 EXHIBIT C ASHLEY POINTE FEES PER UNIT A paid receipt from the School District Office, 602-A Center Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois, must be presented to the City prior to issuance of permit $3,000.00 Separate Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District fee – made payable to Y.B.S.D. $1,400.00 United City of Yorkville Fees 1. Building Permit Cost $650.00 plus $0.20 per square foot $650+$0.20(SF) 2. Water Connection Fees SF and DU $3,700 2+ Bed Att N/A 3. Water Meter Cost Detached Units $ 475 Attached Unit N/A 4. City Sewer Connection Fees $2,000 5. Water and Sewer Inspection Fee $ 25 6. Public Walks/Driveway Inspection Fee $ 35 7. Development Fees Public Works $ 700 Police $ 300 Building $ 150 Library (see note “d” below) $500 * $250 Parks & Recreation $50 Engineering $100 Bristol-Kendall Fire (see note “c” below) $1000 * $500 8. School Fees (see note “a” below) a. School Fee payments are estimates based upon projected residential lot numbers and shall be recalculated based upon the total number of residential lots that are final platted. 157226/3 13 9. All Road Contributions N/A; to be satisfied by improvements to Penman/Rt. 126; Ashley Road/Rt. 126; and Ashley Road Improvements 10. Weather Warning Siren Fee (see note “b” below) $ 75/acre 11. Park Fees. a. Value per acre – $30,000 b. Acres required: 10.05 total acres 6.67 acres dedicated 3.38 acres unsatisfied This acreage is based upon current projected residential lot numbers and shall be recalculated based upon the total number of residential lots that are final platted. c. Actual cost of paving parking lot as evidenced by paid invoices shall be deducted from total amount due. d. (i) Payment of one-third (1/3) of the amount due after credit for parking lot paving shall be due within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from the City; (ii) Payment of one-third (1/3) shall be due on the one year anniversary of the date of approval of this First Amendment by the City Council; and, (iii)Final one-third (1/3) payment shall be due on the second year anniversary of the date of approval of this First Amendment by the City Council. Notes: a. School fees are $1,792.68 per lot, payable at building permit. b. $75/acre x 193.81 = $14,535. $54.25/lot payable at building permit. c. 50% of BKFD fee for Unit 1 paid ($52,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1, (104) pay $500/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay $1,000/lot at building permit. d. 50% of library fee for Unit 1 paid ($26,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1 (104) pay $250.00/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay $500/lot at building permit. 157226/3 14 157226/3 15 157226/3 16 70.00' 6 ( 61 . 1 6 ' 6 : 116.69' 1 ( 6 ( 11 2 . 0 2 ' 6 ( 1 1 1 . 9 2 ' 6 ( 6 ( 1 ( 88.65'1 ( 88.65'1 ( 90.04' 6 ( 85.86' 6 ( 88.65' 1 ( 13 . 2 0 ' 1 ( 127.6 1 ' 1 ( 216.00 ' 1 ( 0.59' 6 ( 2 8 3 .0 0 ' 4 6 ' '4 5 "E L=35.22' R=25.00' &+ &% 1 ( L=46.60' R=267.00' &+ &% 6 ( L=0.73' R=265.00' CH=0.73' &% 6 : 86 . 8 0 ' 6 : 80 . 0 0 ' 6 : 1 0 6 . 0 1 ' 6 ( 1 : 52 . 3 9 ' 6 ( LOT 358 LOT 109 LOT 110 LOT 111 LOT 112 LOT 113 LOT 114 LOT 115 LOT 116 LOT 117 LOT 118 LOT 119 LOT 120 LOT 121 LOT 122 LOT 123 LOT 124 LOT 317 LOT 273 LOT 274 LOT 275 LOT 338 LOT 339 LOT 340 LOT 341 LOT 342 LOT 343 LOT 344 LOT 345 LOT 346 LOT 347 LOT 348 LOT 349 LOT 350 LOT 351 LOT 337 LOT 336 LOT 335 LOT 276 LOT 277 LOT 278 LOT 271 LOT 270 LOT 269 LOT 268 LOT 247 LOT 248 LOT 267 LOT 266 LOT 265 LOT 264 LOT 249 LOT 250 LOT 251 LOT 252 LOT 253 LOT 260 LOT 334 LOT 333 LOT 332 LOT 331 LOT 279 LOT 280 LOT 281 LOT 282 LOT 283 LOT 284 LOT 330 LOT 285 LOT 356 LOT 355 LOT 354 LOT 353 LOT 352 LOT 170 LOT 155 LOT 288 LOT 289 LOT 290 LOT 291 LOT 292 LOT 293 LOT 294 LOT 295 LOT 296 LOT 297 LOT 298 LOT 299 LOT 300 LOT 301 LOT 302 LOT 303LOT 304LOT 305 LOT 306 LOT 308 LOT 307 LOT 328 LOT 329 LOT 309 LOT 310 LOT 311 LOT 312 LOT 313 LOT 314 LOT 315 LOT 327 LOT 326 LOT 325 LOT 324 LOT 323 LOT 322 LOT 321 LOT 320 LOT 319 LOT 316 LOT 318 LOT 139 LOT 140 LOT 287 LOT 286 LOT 125 LOT 156 LOT 157 CA R N O U S T I E T R A I L S T . A N D R E W S D R I V E BELLEISLE L A N E LADYBANK S D R I V E S T . A N D R E W S D R I V E RO S E M O U N T D R I V E WH I T E K I R K L A N E 74 . 6 3 ' 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( ST. ANDREWS D R I V E S T. ANDREWS DRI V E LOT 263 LOT 262 LOT 261 LOT 259 LOT 258 LOT 256 LOT 255 LOT 254 LOT 272 LOT 244 LOT 245 LOT 366 84.51' 1 ( 6 ( 37.26' 6 ( 5 5 . 6 5 ' 6 ( 7 1 . 0 4 ' 6 ( 8 7 . 8 8 ' 6 ( 8 0 . 0 0 ' 6 ( 7 7 . 4 2 ' 6 ( 7 1 . 0 4 ' 6 ( 72 . 9 9 ' 6 : 1 0 6 . 4 5 ' 6 ( 10 6 . 4 5 ' 6 : LOT 269 6 ( 6 : 40.03' L=39.27' R=25.00' &% 1 :&+ 6 : 94.65' L=112.32' R=385.00' &% 1 :&+ L=29.46' R=25.00' &% 6 :&+ L =3 4 0 .2 7 'R =3 3 3 .0 0 ' C B =S 6 7 0 0 '2 6 "W C H =3 2 5 .6 6 ' 1 : L =2 7 2 .0 0 'R =9 6 7 .0 0 ' C B =S 8 8 13 '2 0 "W C H =2 71.11' 6 : L = 5 7 1. 2 0' R = 3 3 3.00' C B = N 5 0 41 '4 6 " W C H =503.70' 1 : L = 3 6 1 . 3 8 ' R = 7 1 7 . 0 0 ' C B = N 1 5 5 9 ' 4 4 " W C H = 3 5 7 . 5 7 ' 1 : L = 2 6 1 . 1 9 ' R = 3 3 5 . 0 0 ' C B = N 8 0 5 ' 5 6 " W C H = 2 5 4.6 2' 70.00' 6 ( L=142.07' R=265.00' &% 1 (&+ 38. 4 6 ' 1 ( 113 . 7 5 ' 1 ( L=39.27' R=25.00' &% 1 (&+ 6 : 150 . 0 0 ' 1 0 2 . 5 4 ' 6 ( 80 . 0 0 ' 6 ( 94. 2 3 ' 6 ( 25 7 . 2 5 ' 6 ( 100 . 1 5 ' 6 ( 117.55' 6 ( 6 ( 119.65' 1 ( 119. 6 5 ' 1 ( 125 . 3 6 ' 1 ( L = 2 6 7 . 4 0 ' R = 3 3 3 . 0 0 ' CB= S 5 14 ' 4 7 " E C H = 2 6 0 . 2 7 ' 10 7 . 6 6 ' 1 ( 12 0 . 9 7 ' 1 ( L=42.68' R=25.00' &% 6 (&+ 66.00' 1 ( 6 ( L=313.5 4' R = 2 6 7 . 0 0 ' CB=S505 7'0 7 " E C H= 2 9 5 . 8 3 ' L=39.27' R=25.00' &% 1 (&+ L=16 5.9 7 ' R = 3 3 3 . 0 0 ' CB=S301' 5 7 " E C H = 1 6 4 . 2 5 ' 82.65' 1 : 6 : L = 3 2 1 . 9 2 ' R = 4 6 7 . 0 0 ' C B = S 8 3 0 ' 1 0 " E C H = 3 15 . 5 9 ' 1 ( L=62.69' R=315.00' &% 6 (&+ 74.66' 1 : 74.66' 1 : 74.66' 1 : 40.00' 1 ( 74.66' 1 : 74.66' 1 : Il l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 1 3 2 2 65 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , S u i t e 2 0 1 , Yo r k v i l l e , I l l i n o i s 6 0 5 6 0 t. 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 ww w . h r g r e e n . c o m EXHIBIT 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 105 106 107 108 357 359 P R E S T W I C K L A N E CA L L A N D E R T R A I L DENOTES AREA HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. W H I T E K I R K L A N E 358 358 358 MU S T A N G W A Y MUSTANG WAY WH I T E K I R K L A N E MUSTANG WA Y LOT 2 LOT 1 358 *SEE NOTE XX DENOTES 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND DENOTES 5/8" IRON ROD SET FOR REFERENCE ONLY 74.68' 6 ( 20 0 10 0 50 0 200100500 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Memo To: David Schultz, P.E., HR Green From: Bruce J. Aderman, P.E. Cc: Brad Sanderson, P.E., EEI Julie Morrison, P.E.,EEI Krysti Barksdale-Noble, CCD-Yorkville Date: July 29, 2013 Re: Yorkville Christian High School, Prestwick Phase 2 Yorkville, IL EEI Job #: YO1313-DR As requested, the following is a detailed review of the typical road sections presented in the engineering plan set dated July 5, 2013 as a follow-up to EEI review comments of July 23, 2013 for the subject project. General • There is a discrepancy in the height of the gutter flag between the specifications (10”), Sheet C-02 and the Concrete Curb and Gutter detail (9”) and the Reverse Concrete Curb and Gutter detail (9”), Sheet C-17. Thickness of the gutter flag and pavement section affects the thickness of the aggregate under the curb. In order to provide the proper curb subgrade elevation, the aggregate base course under the curb will vary depending on the pavement section. In accordance with the specifications the curb subgrade is to be a minimum 1” below the pavement subgrade. The gutter flag thickness shall be 10”. • Consideration should be given to revise the typical sections to show the curb subgrade a minimum 1” below the pavement subgrade to help clarify the aggregate base thicknesses. • There is a discrepancy in the thickness of the aggregate base under the sidewalk between the call out in the typical sections (2”) and the Sidewalk/Patio Section (4”), Sheet C-04. • Surface prime coat is specified on Sheet C-02 but no surface prime coat shown in the typical sections Sheet C-04. Typical Street Cross Section – Site Access Boulevard • There are discrepancies in the total width of the boulevard and the width of the drive lanes. o The typical section on Sheet C-04 shows a dimension of 21’ E-E (Edge - Edge) for the lane widths but is drawn from E-B of median. If the lane width is to be as dimensioned, the lane width would be 19.5’ E-E. Memo David Schultz July 29, 2013 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Memo o Sheet C-07 gives a dimension of 23’ F-F (or 21’ E-E) for the lane widths and a median width of 10’ B-B (Back – Back). This would result in a total road width of 58’ B-B or 55’ E-E. The typical section on Sheet C-04 shows a total road width of 55’ B-B and 52’ E-E. • Key Note 9 & 10 appears to identify the same item but with varying level of detail in the description. • The structural number (SN) for Key Note 5 does is not correct for the thickness of binder course identified (2-1/2”). The SN for the 2-1/2” binder course should be 0.88 and the total SN for the section should be 3.04 not 3.74 as shown on the detail. o If the SN is correct, then the thickness of the binder needs to be changed to 4-1/2”. o If the binder course thickness is 4-1/2’, then the thickness of the aggregate base course under the curb will need to be increased to 9” to match the specification for subgrade elevations between the pavement and curb (see above). Typical Street Cross Section – Mustang Way (Local Road) • A 10’ drainage and utility easement is shown on the right side of the typical section but not identified on the plat. Coordination between the engineering plans and the plat shall occur. • A storm sewer is shown on the right side of the typical section, however, no storm sewer is shown on the plan sheets. The typical section should match the plans. • The pavement section has total thickness of 14” therefore the curb plus aggregate thickness shall be a minimum 15”. The thickness of aggregate under the curb shall be increased to 5”. Typical Street Cross Section – Mustang Way From Ashley Road • A 10’ drainage and utility easement is shown on each side of the roadway on the typical section but not identified on the plat. Coordination between the engineering plans and the plat shall occur. • A water main is shown on the right side of the typical section however, no water main is shown on the plan sheets. The typical section should match the plans. • A sidewalk is shown on each side of the road on the typical section however, no sidewalk is shown on the plan sheets. The typical section and plans should match. • The ground slope on the left side of the typical section shows the ground to slope from the ROW to the curb in the parkway but the grading plan has the ground sloping way from the curb toward the ROW and the slope on the right side of the typical section is shown with a slope of 4% toward the curb but the grading plan is at a steep slope (+/-5:1). The grading plan is to be revised as shown in the typical section. • There is a discrepancy in the road width between the typical section and the plans. The typical section shows the road width to be 31’ E-E and 34’ B-B but the width of the road on Sheet C-07 shows the road width as 36’ E-E. This section is a 3 lane section and therefore should be a minimum 36’ E-E in width. The typical section is to be revised. Memo David Schultz July 29, 2013 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Memo • The structural number (SN) for Key Notes 3 and 5 are not correct for the thickness for the aggreagate base course (12”) and binder course (4-1/2”). The SN for the 12” aggregate base course should be 1.56 and the SN for the 4-1/2” binder course should be 1.58 for a total SN of 3.74, as shown on the detail. • The thickness for the aggregate base course under the curb shall be increased to 9” to match the specification for subgrade elevations between the pavement and curb (see above). Background The original land-cash donation for the Prestwick of Yorkville development was $80,000, and in total the developer donated 6.67 acres and was to pay 6.2 acres in land-cash for a total of $496,000 to complete park improvements Staff met with the developer at Plan Council on Thursday, July 25th, and the developer made the following requests: 1) The land-cash value be reduced to $25,000 2) The proposed bike path through the school site and the park site be counted towards the required land-cash donation 3) The grading and seeding of the park be counted towards the land-cash donation* *The developer was informed at the Plan Council meeting that the grading and seeding of the park site is required whether or not the site has already been deeded to the City and cannot be counted towards the land-cash donation. Due to the reduction to the number of homes in the development, the developer now owes a total of 10.05 acres with 3.38 land cash donation due. At the proposed developer’s value of $25,000, this totals $84,500. The developer’s proposal was taken to Park Board at their July 30th, 2013 meeting. Land-Cash Donation The fee lock expired for this development so at this time their land cash value is $101,000/acre. At this time, the Park Board would agree to an $80,000/acre cash donation due to the fact that the park still has to be developed and the cost of playground equipment and labor has not gone down, but in fact gone up. This would provide $270,400 for park development of the 6.67 acre site. Trails According to the annexation agreement, the City agreed to own and maintain trails, however, no trails are located in the exhibit of the original annexation agreement indicating their proposed location, but a trail is now illustrated on an attached exhibit as part of the proposed amended agreement. The City also agreed that any contributions for land cash for parks not satisfied by land donations shall be made up with cash contributions for the difference in value or in kind improvements within the park and/or construction of bicycle paths. Memorandum To: City Council From: Laura Schraw, Director of Parks and Recreation CC: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks Date: August 8, 2013 Subject: Yorkville Christian School Subdivision At this time, the Park Board is not interested in having a trail constructed across the property when sidewalks already exist along the two adjacent roads (Penman Rd. and Prestwick Ln.) and giving credit for such trail. Because the school is private, Park Board recommends that language be changed in the agreement to only accept responsibility to own and maintain trails that are on public property as the City should not maintain private improvements. Park Board would be agreeable to giving credit for a parking lot on the park site as long as the location and size were approved and the City can inspect construction and verify the cost with a copy of all receipts. Due to the two existing roads that are adjacent to the park not allowing on-road parking, the park will be unusable for some time until parking can be provided. Recommendation Final recommendation is to receive $80,000/acre cash for a total of $270,400, which can be reduced through the construction of an approved parking lot. If the City Council does not approve of $80,000/acre, an alternative is to not take a cash donation at this time and allow the Park Board to request additional land or cash value at the time of Unit 2 platting. LAND VALUATION STUDY FOR: Cash Contribution in-Lieu-of Site Dedication United City of Yorkville, Illinois AS OF: May 1, 2012 BY: David W. Phillips & Company PREPARED FOR: Ms. Laura K. Schraw Interim Director of Parks and Recreation United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 D A V I D W. P H I L L I P S A N D C O M P A N Y R E A L E S T A T E A P P R A I S E R S A N D C O N S U L T A N T S 1601 BOND STREET . SUITE 208 . NAPERVILLE, IL 60563 . 630/357-8900 . FAX 630/357-8998 May 21, 20112 Ms. Laura K. Schraw Interim Director of Parks and Recreation United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Land Valuation Study Cash Contribution in-Lieu-of Site Dedication United City of Yorkville, Illinois Dear Ms. Schraw: As you requested, we have prepared a Land Valuation Study in connection with the United City of Yorkville pertaining to Cash Contributions in-Lieu-of Site Dedication for new developments. The purpose of this Study is to provide our opinion of the fair market value for a typical improved acre of residential land within the boundaries of the Yorkville Parks Department. Our fair market wholesale value conclusion for a typical improved acre of residential land within the boundaries of the United City of Yorkville is as follows: $30,000 per acre THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS PER ACRE The above value is based on market conditions prevailing as of May 1, 2012. The value is subject to the assumptions and limiting conditions stated in the report. The following report describes the geographic area that is the subject of this study, sets forth the premises of the study, presents the data considered and communicates the analyses and reasoning leading to our value conclusion. Respectfully submitted, DAVID W. PHILLIPS & COMPANY Timothy J. Sullivan, MAI, SRA State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Illinois License No. 553.000278 Expires September 30, 2013 12707-SUM TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PAGE Title Page ................................................................................................................................................ i Letter of Transmittal .............................................................................................................................. ii Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. iii Certification of Value ............................................................................................................................ 1 PREMISES OF THE APPRAISAL Assumptions and Limiting Conditions .................................................................................................. 2 Definition of Market Value; Property Rights Appraised ..................................................................... 5 Scope, Purpose and Intended Use of the Appraisal .............................................................................. 6 Overview of Our Assignment ............................................................................................................... 7 Definition of Improved Acreage ........................................................................................................... 8 Area Description .................................................................................................................................... 9 Market Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 12 VALUATION OF RESIDENTIAL IMPROVED ACREAGE Valuation Analysis Introduction ......................................................................................................... 15 Residential Acreage Land Sales .......................................................................................................... 16 Market Data Analysis and Value Conclusions ................................................................................... 25 Supplemental Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 29 ADDENDUM Excerpts from Ordinance 2009-50 Site Dedication Standards Qualifications of the Appraiser 1 CERTIFICATION The undersigned do hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. We have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. We have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. Based on our experience and knowledge with these property types, we are in compliance with the Competency Provision of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. As of the date of this report, Timothy J. Sullivan has completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute. No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the persons signing this certification. Timothy J. Sullivan, MAI, SRA State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Illinois License No. 553.000278 Expires September 30, 2013 2 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. The Appraiser assumes no responsibility for the legal description provided or for matters of a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor does the Appraiser render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated in this report. 2. The property is appraised free and clear of any or all liens and encumbrances unless otherwise stated in this report. 3. It is assumed that the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless otherwise stated in this report. 4. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them. 5. Any sketch in this report may show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. Maps and exhibits found in this report are provided for reader reference purposes only. No guarantee as to accuracy is expressed or implied unless otherwise stated in this report. No survey has been made for the purpose of this report. 6. Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed unless otherwise stated in this report. 7. Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the Appraiser, and contained in the report, were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for the accuracy of such items furnished the Appraiser can be assumed by the Appraiser. 8. It is assumed that this property conforms to all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless a nonconformity has been stated, defined, and considered in this appraisal report. 9. It is assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national governmental, or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimates contained in this report are based. 3 10. It is assumed that the property is in full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless otherwise stated in this report. 11. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous material, which may or may not be present on the property, was not observed by the Appraiser. The Appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The Appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. Any comment by the appraiser that might suggest the possibility of the presence of such substances should not be taken as confirmation of the presence of hazardous waste and/or toxic materials. Such determination would require investigation by a qualified expert in the field of environmental assessment. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea-formaldehyde foam insulation, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The appraiser's value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value unless otherwise stated in the report. No responsibility is assumed for any environmental conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The appraiser's descriptions and resulting comments are the result of the routine observations made during the appraisal process. 12. The distribution, if any, of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate allocations for land and buildings must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 13. On all appraisals, subject to satisfactory completion, repairs, or alterations, the appraisal report and value conclusion are contingent upon completion of the improvements in a workmanlike manner and in accordance with the submitted plans and specifications. 14. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey analysis of this property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect upon the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider non- compliance with the requirements of the ADA in estimating the value of the property, unless otherwise stated in the scope of this report. 15. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraiser, and in any event, only with proper written qualification and only in its entirety. 4 16. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser, or the firm with which the appraiser is connected) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news sales, or other media without prior written consent and approval of the appraiser. 17. The Appraiser is not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made the appraisal of the property in question, unless arrangements for such testimony have previously been made. 5 DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE Market Value is defined in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA"), as well as the Federal Register 12 CFR Part 722 (Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines), as follows: “The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests; 3. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. payment is made in terms of cash in United States dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.” This definition is compatible with the definition of market value in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition, 2010, p. 122, by the Appraisal Institute. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED The subject property has been appraised as if owned in fee simple, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and special assessments. Fee Simple Estate is defined as "Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat." (Source: Appraisal Institute, Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Addition, 2010, p. 78.) 6 SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL The scope of the appraisal assignment defines the extent to which data is collected, confirmed and reported. In that regard, the scope of this appraisal has involved the following: 1. Collection of all necessary and pertinent factual data regarding the subject community, using public and private records. 2. Review regional, community and neighborhood factors and trends. 3. Extensive research, through various sources, to collect pertinent market data for the Sales Comparison Approach to value. Generally, at a minimum, the sales were confirmed through public records. In most instances, additional verification was made by a party to the transaction, i.e. buyer or seller, attorney, broker, etc. 4. Review and analysis of the market data in order to arrive at opinions of value by this approach. 5. Preparation of our findings into a Summary Appraisal Report, prepared under Standards Rule 2-2(b) of an appraisal performed under Standard 1. PURPOSE AND INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL The purpose of this appraisal is to provide our opinion of the fair market wholesale value for a typical improved acre of residential land within the boundaries of the United City of Yorkville. The intended use of this appraisal is to assist our client in determining the appropriate payments or fees in-lieu-of a land donation for new developments within the parks department geographic area. 7 OVERVIEW OF OUR ASSIGNMENT The United City of Yorkville is contemplating updating its ordinance that addresses requirements for new developments to dedicate park land to provide for the needs of the new population of these developments. In certain instances, it may not be practical for a developer to donate land, for a variety of reasons. In these instances, the ordinance has a provision to accept a cash contribution or derivative in lieu of actual land donations. In order to provide a fair basis for this cash contribution, estimation of a fair market value for representative improved acreage must be made. The focus of our assignment is to estimate what a typical purchaser would pay for representative acreage in the planning area. We assume the acreage is zoned, platted and improved, meaning no off-site improvements are required. Improved acreage means having street frontage and utilities at the property line (or actually into the site) offering immediate development capacity. We also assume the site is graded. Further, we assume the representative acreage has no extraordinary site features - either beneficial or detrimental to the development. It should be reiterated that our assignment does not involve a valuation of a specific subject property per se. Rather, it reflects what a representative purchaser would pay for acreage as defined above. One important factor with regards to defining representative residential acreage requires us to make certain assumptions relating to density. In order to do this, we have considered developments approved in the planning area over the last several years. We have also taken into account areas likely to be developed. We have reviewed the Yorkville Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Control Ordinance. Most developbale land is designated as Suburban or Estate for future land use. Based on our research, we believe the most likely density of representative residential acreage will be within a range of 1.50 to 2.0 units per gross acre. We recognize that some acreage may be developed with a higher density multi-family residential project, but that the vast majority will likely be single family residential in nature. To reiterate, a review of the comprehensive plan indicates that the majority of land suitable for redevelopment is slated for lower density use (Suburban or Estate). While there may be pressure to develop certain areas as buffer townhouse or condo style projects, detached single family development is more likely. In fact, there are numerous instances throughout the greater metropolitan area where developers are seeking (or have sought) to downzone previously higher density zoned land to single family detached zoning. The prevailing thought is that there is likely to be greater demand for single family detached residences when market conditions improve. 8 DEFINITION OF IMPROVED ACREAGE We have considered the requirements of park site dedications. These are clearly spelled out in City Ordinance No. 2009-50. They generally require sites to be improved. By this definition, sites are to be graded and include topsoil. They are to be serviced by appropriate drainage and erosion controls. Utilities are to be brought into the site. They are to include two street frontages with a minimum of 450 feet and the street improvements such as curbs, gutters and are to be in place. Excerpts from this ordinance can be found in the addenda. The above is the basis for our valuation. We have been further instructed to assume the land is legally zoned and platted. This essentially reflects what the particular district/department would have to pay for a site in the condition described above. 9 AREA DESCRIPTION Location The area in the study is the United City of Yorkville. The city is situated in the north central portion of Kendall County and is located +/- 50 miles southwest of downtown Chicago. Nearby communities include Montgomery and Oswego to the northeast; Plano to the west, and Sugar Grove to north. Unincorporated areas of Kendall County are immediately adjacent to Yorkville in all directions. These are primarily undeveloped land areas with potential for future annexation to the city. A significant natural asset is the Fox River which generally flows east to west through the city. Yorkville was incorporated in 1887. It is the county seat. Population and Housing Characteristics According to the U S Census, Yorkville had a population in 2010 of 16,921. This represented a 173% increase over the 2000 Census estimate of 6,189. The 2000 estimate represented a 58% increase over the 1990 population of 3,925. Yorkville had enjoyed steady growth during the early and middle years of the previous decade and was one of the fastest growing communities in one of the fastest growing counties in the country. Due to oversupply of residential properties, new construction is down significantly in the last four plus years. The census indicated that there were 6,353 total housing units of which 5,912 units were occupied. The 2010 census figures indicate the median household income was estimated at $82,007 and the median age was estimated to be 32.4 years. The average household size was reported as 2.84 persons. The average family size was reported as 3.11 persons. Yorkville is inhabited primarily by single family homeowners. Most homes have been built within the past 20 years and are situated in well planned tract subdivisions. Until the slowdown in the real estate market, extensive residential development had been taking place throughout the city. According to the multiple listing service, single family home prices ranged from $50,000 to $840,000 over the past 12 months. The average detached single-family home selling price is reported in the multiple listing service at $211,956 over the last 12 months. There are a number of multi-family developments located in town. Most apartments are found in 2 to 6 unit buildings scattered throughout town. Condominium and townhouses typically range in price from about $16,000 to $274,000, with an average selling price of $75,211 over the past 12 months as reported in the multiple listing service. 10 Commerce and Industry Yorkville has a relatively small downtown shopping district located along Bridge Street (Route 47) and the Fox River. Many of the older storefronts have been refurbished in recent years. The greatest concentration of commercial development is found near the intersection of Routes 34 and 47. This intersection is billed as the busiest in Kendall County. A Menard’s anchors the northeast quadrant. In addition to the home improvement store, several outlots have been and are currently under development on the 269 acre total tract. The southeast quadrant features a new Jewel Foods Store anchored shopping center. Heading west on Route 34 are numerous new commercial ventures including the regional Kendall Marketplace with such major retailers as Target Superstore, Kohl’s and Home Depot. Major shopping needs are further served by the Fox Valley Mall area in Aurora. There is a large Caterpillar Tractor plant located northeast of Yorkville near Montgomery. This plant employs over 3,200 people. There are industrial areas in the north and south end of town. Major employers include Wrigley - Amurol Confections and Boombah. The latter recently opened a 265,000 square foot facility on 21 acres. Being the county seat, there are a number of government offices in Yorkville, as well. Many of these are new, modern structures. Transportation Transportation is predominantly by private automobile. The East-West Tollway (Interstate 88) is located + 9 miles north of town. The tollway provides convenient access to Chicago and surrounding suburban communities. Interstate 55 is located about 11 miles from Yorkville with Interstate 80 being about 19 miles away. Other major access routes in the area include Route 34, Route 30, Route 71, and Route 47. Commuter train service is available via the Burlington Northern Railroad in Aurora. Aurora Airport is located +8 miles northwest of town. O'Hare International Airport is approximately 50 miles northeast and is easily accessible via the Illinois Tollway System. Also, Midway Airport is about 43 miles away from the city. Community Facilities/Village Services The community is served by Yorkville Community Unit School District 115. The average ACT score for Yorkville High School was above the statewide average. Places of worship of numerous denominations can be found within Yorkville or in nearby towns. There is a rescue squad and 911 service in the city. Rush-Copley Hospital is located ten miles northeast of town and several medical clinics also serve the area. We do note that Rush-Copley has a clinic and emergency room in Yorkville. The local park board administers numerous acres of parks and various other recreational facilities. The 38,000 square foot REC center houses an indoor track, lap pool, whirlpool, open gym and fitness equipment. Numerous classes are offered here. Nearby recreational facilities include 11 Silver Springs State Park and the Hoover Outdoor Education Center, a 406 acre facility operated by the Kendall County Forest Preserve. The Fox Valley Family YMCA, which is located just outside Yorkville, also sponsors a number of programs. Yorkville is home to Raging Waves which is the largest water amusement park in the state. The city’s well water supply and treatment facility has significant excess capacity. Wastewater treatment facilities are provided by Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District by means of a secondary plant. Wastewater treatment facilities are also provided by the Fox Metro Sanitary District which has ample capacity. Electricity is provided by Commonwealth Edison; natural gas by the Northern Illinois Gas Company; and telephone service is provided by AT&T. Comcast is the cable provider. Yorkville provides full-time police protection. Fire protection is provided by f the Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection Department which covers the city and outlying areas. 12 MARKET CONDITIONS The real estate market is currently in a down cycle. Property values have been declining and demand has stalled, resulting in longer marketing times. This is due in part to the persistent sluggish national economy. High unemployment continues to persist. Supply far outweighs demand at this time. The exact time period as to when the real estate market will improve is unknown and opinions vary significantly among different professionals that are involved in the local and general real estate market. The present credit crunch has exacerbated the conditions. Project feasibility has diminished if it exists at all. Vastly insufficient returns, if any, do not provide the necessary incentive to attract and maintain a developer’s interest. New development typically does not justify construction costs. Based on numerous conversations with market participants - such as brokers, developers, lenders and municipal officials, - the limited activity that is seen is for owner users or speculative investors. The latter typically require ample discounts due to the uncertainty and risk of when market conditions will improve. Continued reports in the media state statistics citing the re-pricing that is taking place and the increased marketing times. Some respondents refer to market conditions as a malaise with prices being in a freefall. Also, there is a significant inventory of surplus land, condominiums and houses in the Yorkville market area. Interviews with local brokers report that negotiations presently taking place reflect that buyers do not see improvement in demand any time in the near future. Accordingly, prices reflect the lengthier anticipated holding periods. Also, most lenders we talk to report more planned “workouts” for builders and developers struggling with cash flow. This situation is likely to put additional pressure on re-pricing currently taking place. This could come in the form of additional foreclosures. Many lenders took mortgaged land back from developers and builders in the last several years. Some of these lenders intended to hold these properties in their portfolios until improvement in market conditions. When this never materialized, they tired of the holding costs and many properties came on the market. In some improved subdivisions, holding costs could come in the form of not only real estate taxes but also association dues. For raw land, at least the properties could be farmed and continue to be assessed as farmland with their lower taxes. Many property owners are drowning in debt, lenders are not significantly lending and for many real estate investors, property income flows are declining. There is an unprecedented avoidance of risk. We believe that financial institutions will continue to be pressured into moving bad loans off balance sheets, using auctions to speed up the process. The current real estate market is changing and the economic recession we thought we had in early 2008 has turned out to be much deeper and longer and has inflicted much more damage to the commercial and residential real estate industries than anyone expected. 13 The overall real estate market is not likely to recover until the unemployment rate decreases significantly. According to the Illinois Department of Employment Security, Illinois had an unemployment rate as of March 2012 of 8.8%, which is down significantly from the March 2011 rate of 9.3%. Kendall County had an unemployment rate as of March 2012 of 8.3%, which is down slightly from the March 2011 rate of 8.5%. The following table summarizes pricing levels for single family detached residences in the Yorkville market over the last several years. The data was taken from the local multiple listing service. YEAR NUMBER OF SINGLE- FAMILY SALES AVERAGE SELLING PRICE AVERAGE MARKETING TIME 2007 234 $309,513 166 days 2008 203 $293,744 217 days 2009 206 $240,157 196 days 2010 260 $211,967 190 days 2011 211 $230,084 196 days 2012 – 4 months 54 $205,508 186 days The overall price decline for single-family detached residences in Yorkville from 2007 through 2011 was about 25%. Like many communities, Yorkville appears to have a high percentage of foreclosure and short sale transactions relative to total sales of single-family homes. This trend has had a negative effect on values. There are currently 153 active single-family listings in Yorkville with an average marketing time of 199 days. The asking prices range from $40,800 to $1,299,000 with an average asking price of about $296,000 and a median price of $253,000. 14 Also, the amount of permit activity has dropped off significantly in Yorkville and nearby areas. SOCDS building permits database reports the following new construction building permit activity for the Yorkville, Oswego and Kendall County as a whole: Single Family Housing Unit Building Permits Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 – 3 months Yorkville 413 158 64 42 43 13 Oswego 434 149 136 116 112 24 Kendall County 1,061 349 217 171 169 39 We have considered data presented by such firms as Metrostudy. This data generally indicates that the greater Yorkville area has significant inventory of developed lots and that absorption has been extremely slowed. This factor has put downward pressure on lot values as well as raw acreage values. We were provided sales figures for several ongoing single family developments in Yorkville by Metrostudy. These reflect house/lot packages. These absorption rates are tempered by the fact that sales within these developments began from 2002 thru 2007, which were more favorable real estate markets. Current absorption is lower within these developments. This is true not only of the Yorkville market area but also the metropolitan area as well. Some key statistics found in the first quarter data supplied by Metrostudy indicates that there are currently 2,137 vacant developed lots and 20,768 future lots in the Yorkville planning jurisdiction based on approved plats, potential annexations, etc. This could translate into a 20 year supply or higher. The vast majority of this actual and potential supply is slated for single family detached product. 15 VALUATION ANALYSIS In order to estimate the value of the representative acreage, we have utilized the Sales Comparison Approach. This is the primary and most recognized method utilized in valuing vacant land. In the Sales Comparison Approach, market value is estimated by comparing the subject property to similar properties that have recently sold, are listed for sale or are under contract. A major premise of the Sales Comparison Approach is that the market value of a property is directly related to the prices of comparable, competitive properties. This approach focuses on similarities and differences among properties that affect value. Adjustments for differences are made to the price of each comparable property to make the comparables similar to the subject on the effective date of the value estimate. The basic steps involved in the application of this approach are as follows: 1. Conduct research to obtain information on sales transactions, listings and pending offers for properties that are similar to the subject in terms of characteristics such as property type, date of sale, zoning, highest and best use, size and location. 2. Verify the information by confirming that the data obtained are factually accurate and that the transactions reflect arm's length considerations. 3. Analyze the data on the basis of a common and relevant unit of comparison, such as price per square foot or price per acre. 4. Compare the sale properties with the subject and adjust the sale price of each comparable for all significant differences that have an effect on value. 5. Summarize the analysis of the data and estimate a final value conclusion. The sales on the following pages were selected as the most comparable in order to arrive at a Market Value for the representative acreage. Pertinent data is presented for each sale property and is followed by an analysis of the sales and final conclusions regarding the value of representative acreage of improved residential land. 16 LAND SALE NO. 1 Evergreen Farm Estates SEC & NEC Fox Road and Pavillion Road (as extended) Kendall Township Yorkville PIN: 05-06-100-102 et. al Lot Size: 48.88 acres Zoning: R-2, One Family Residence District Planned No. of Lots: 76 (Concept) Density: 1.55 lots per acre Utilities: Require extensions Date of Sale: December 2011 Sale Price: $414,800 Sale Terms: Cash to seller Grantor: PB OREO LLC Grantee: Brandon Road Properties LLC Document Number: Not reported Sale Price per Acre: $8,486 Sale Price per Lot: $5,458 Comments: Bank owned property which consists of two parcels bisected by Fox Road. The northerly portion backs to railroad tracks. This was purchased as an investment. Parcel approved for subdivision but would have significant off-site improvement costs including utility recapture. 17 LAND SALE NO. 2 Grande Reserve Yorkville Bristol Township PIN(s): 01-36-201-013 Lot Size: 877 acres (as reported by the buyer) Zoning: R-2, One Family Residence District PUD Planned No. of Units: 2,212 Density: 2.35 units per acre - Overall project Utilities: Immediately available (with most installed) Date of Sale: February 2012 Sale Price: $10,800,000 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: Bank of America Corporation Grantee: Avanti Properties Group. Document Numbers: R2012-059613 Sale Price per Acre: $12,315 Sale Price per Lot: N/A Comments: This sale involved the remaining land area of the Grande Reserve master planned community. The entire project included approximately 1,127 acres. The total number of units planned was 2,650 - which was to be comprised of mostly single family detached residences. The total project density was to be 2.35 units per acre. This includes acres of stormwater management, open space and trails. Portions of the project had been sold to different builders in the mid 2000s. This sale land acquisition was sold by the foreclosing lender. A significant portion of the land acquired in this transaction included finished lots. 18 LAND SALE NO. 3 Hunt Club West – West Side of Minkler Road Oswego Bristol Township PIN(s): 02-25-300-008 and 02-25-400-002 Lot Size: 51.67 Acres Zoning: R-2, Single Family Residence District Planned No. of Lots: 58 Density: 1.12 lots per acre Utilities: Immediately available Date of Sale: March 2012 Sale Price: $645,875 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: Hovsite Hunt Club LLC Grantee: Donald J. Hamman Document Number: R2012-00005989 Sale Price per Acre: $12,500 Sale Price per Lot: $11,136 Comments: This was part of a former Town and Country (Pinnacle Corporation) approved project. Land area includes an 11.3 acre stormwater management site and a 2.3 acre site. A number of annexation and infrastructure fees had been prepaid and credits exist for tap on fees. Asking price was $15,000 per acre. 19 LAND SALE NO. 4 Blackberry Woods Lots along Carly Circle et. al. Bristol Township Yorkville PIN(s): 02-29-123-015 et.al. Lot Size: 59.51 acres Zoning: R2 - One Family Residential Planned No. of Lots: 105 Density: 1.92 lots per acre project wide Utilities: Immediately available and some installed Date of Sale: June 2010 Sale Price: $1,647,500 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller, Grantor: Castle Bank N.A.. Grantee: Crestview Builders Document Number: 2010-00010916 Sale Price per Acre: $27,684 Sale Price per Lot: $15,690 Comments: This transaction involved the remaining unsold lots in the Blackberry Woods subdivision. About 62% of the lots were fully improved with the remainder platted but requiring the streets to be improved. It was sold on the basis of price per lot rather than price per acre. In fact, we have not been able to verify if the reported acreage is correct in CoStar reporting service. We note that the majority of this property (100 lots) is back on the market with an asking price of $18,000 per lot. 20 LAND SALE NO. 5 3663 Plainfield Road Oswego Township Oswego P.O. PIN(s): 03-28-100-008 and 03-28-200-007. Lot Size: +/- 82 Acres Zoning: Agricultural Planned No. of Lots: 133 engineered Density: 1.62 lots per acre Utilities: Require extension Date of Sale: December 2011 Sale Price: $1,194,870 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: Melrose Holdings LLC Grantee: Brandon Road Properties LLC Document Number: 2012-00000679 Sale Price per Acre: $14,572 Sale Price per Lot: $8,984 Comments: This is a trapezoid shaped parcel adjacent to the village but not annexed. Reportedly, a concept plan was in place for 133 single family homesites. It appears that Morgan Creek traverses the southern portion of the property. 21 LAND SALE NO. 6 SWQ Naperville Road and 127th Street Wheatland Township Plainfield . PIN: 01-35-100-007 et. al. Lot Size: 128.47 acres Zoning: R-1 Village Planned No. of Lots: 162 Density: 1.26 units per acre Utilities: At lot line Date of Sale: June 2011 Sale Price: $2,100,000 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: Wheatland Bank and Trust Co. Grantee: Riverstone Plainfield LLC Document Number: 2011-60787 Sale Price per Acre: $16,346 Sale Price per Lot: $12,963 Comments: This was sold by a foreclosing bank. It is an irregularly shaped parcel which is within the corporate limits and had received preliminary approval for 162 SFRs to be known as Riverstone. The Dupage River bisects parcel and the parcel has about 40% flood plain. 22 LAND SALE NO. 7 East side of Ridge Road, southeast of Plainfield Road Na-Au-Say Township Plainfield PIN(s): 06-01-400-002 Lot Size: 125.72 acres Zoning: R-1 Planned No. of Lots: See below Density: 5.5 units per acre potential Utilities: Require Extension Date of Sale: March 2011 Sale Price: $2,350,000 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: First Midwest Bank Grantee: S and E Investments LLC Series 5 Document Number: 2011-00007133 Sale Price per Acre: $18,692 Sale Price per Lot: N/A Comments: This is an irregularly shaped parcel which is mostly level. Significant building improvements with one being used for an Head Start facility. The improvements offer contributory value on an interim basis. No flood plain. Seller was a foreclosing lender. 23 LAND SALE NO. 8 NEC Dickson and Galena Roads Bristol Township Montgomery PIN(s): 02-11-151-002 and 02-10-251-004 Lot Size: 114.078 acres Zoning: R-3 and R5B PUD Planned No. of Lots: 319 including some townhouses Density: 2.796 units per acre Utilities: Available Date of Sale: December 2011 Sale Price: $1,532,520 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: Jericho Holdings LLC Grantee: Dickson Galena LLC Document Number: 2012-00000184 Sale Price per Acre: $13,434 Sale Price per Lot: $4,804 Comments: This parcel was sold by a builder who had previously obtained annexation and preliminary approval for 319 units. The site plan included 21 acres of open space as well as a donation of 25 acres to the forest preserve. Utilities are at the perimeter of the parcel but would have to be extended. 24 CO M P A R A B L E A C R E A G E L A N D S A L E S M A P 25 MARKET DATA ANALYSIS AND VALUE CONCLUSIONS The preceding acreage sales have been analyzed and adjusted for varying features. Adjustments are made to the comparables to reflect what we feel would represent standard acreage with no outstanding parcel features. As stated before, Yorkville is a growing community with ample developable land remaining. It is surrounded by significant agricultural lands which offer potential development. Some of the sales cited are from outside Yorkville but are used here as supplementary data to support our value conclusion. These additional sales are comparable because they are generally in the same sub-market and appeal to the same potential buyers. It is important to note that extremely soft demand for residential lots has eliminated many potential builder buyers. Increasingly, buyers of land are investors taking advantage of relatively low prices compared to several years ago. In all cases, locational differences have been accounted for. We have attempted to cite sales in the last few years as they are considered most indicative of current market conditions. Older sales would have to be adjusted downward because of continued evidence of declining prices. Additionally, a key factor taken into account is the degree of the “improved” nature of the comparables. To the best of our knowledge, the reported acreage sizes of the comparables are net of any exterior street rights-of-way. The primary sales selected are summarized as follows: Sale No. Location No. Acres Date of Sale Density – Lots/Acre Sale Price per Acre Sale Price per Lot 1 Yorkville 48.88 December 2011 1.55 $8,486 $5,458 2 Yorkville 877 February 2012 2.27 $12,315 N/A 3 Oswego 51.67 March 2012 1.12 $12,500 $11,136 4 Yorkville 59.51 June 2010 1.62 $27,684 $15,690 5 Oswego PO 82 December 2011 1.62 $14,572 $8,984 6 Plainfield 128.47 June 2011 1.26 $16,346 $12,963 7 Plainfield 125.72 March 2011 N/A $18,692 N/A 8 Montgomery 114.078 December 2011 2.78 $13,434 $4.804 Most of the comparables involved some off-site costs. This is usually either in the form of extension of utilities to the perimeter of the site or road improvements to the existing street frontage. With most of the comparables, it is difficult to discern the breakdown of these type costs. However, we have reviewed a number of Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Cost opinions from proposed 26 subdivisions with which we are familiar. These generally range from $65,000 to $90,000 per acre. It is important to note that much of this is dated because little activity has taken place in recent years. However, the costs referenced above typically include installation of new streets and extension of utilities into the new streets. This total cost range has the majority of expenditures allocated to items that a developer dedicating a site would not be responsible for. In other words, only a small portion of the cost range is typically for “off-site” costs. We have analyzed the above referenced data and have allocated costs associated with installing curbs and gutters and grading. We have also referred to the Marshall Valuation Service, which is a nationally published cost manual utilizing data compiled by appraisers, estimators, and statisticians. The vast majority of sellers are lenders or troubled developers. While in stable market conditions this factor might require a “conditions of sale” adjustment, it does not hold true when it represents the predominant market activity. An interesting note is that agricultural or farmland prices are nearing or equal to speculative development land prices. Sale 1 is one of the local sales. It is more raw in nature than what we are considering as representative improved acreage. In other words, it is not improved to the same degree as what would be required under the dedication ordinance, i.e. as having utilities immediately available. It is adjusted considerably upward. Sale 2 is the largest sale cited. It is more regional in scope. While an upward adjustment is required for its massive size, this is partially offset by the fact that most of the lots are improved. The overall adjustment is upward. Sale 3 is a recent sale which is annexed and zoned but it requires an upward adjustment for its less finished condition. The net adjustment is upward. Sale 4 is the oldest sale cited. It is cited primarily because it is in the heart of the city. It requires a downward date of sale adjustment because of continued depreciation in land prices over the last two years. It sold in a stronger market. We reiterate that the 100 of the lots are back on the market at a higher asking price per lot and per acre. The majority of the lots are finished. Sale 5’s overall location is considered slightly superior and a downward adjustment is required. It is adjusted upward for the added expense of utility extension. Also, it appears to be affected by some flood plain. The net adjustment is upward. Sale 6 is located in Plainfield and a downward location adjustment is warranted. This is more than offset by the reported flood plain. The river offers a view amenity. It is adjusted upward for the higher costs of utility extension. The net adjustment is upward. 27 Sale 7 is unincorporated but adjacent to the Village of Plainfield. It is not platted. The comprehensive plan shows this area as potential mid density residential. The configuration and topography of this parcel would likely result in a higher density than what we believe is representative. A downward adjustment is required for the contributory value of the existing building improvements. It is adjusted upward for the lack of adjacent utilities. A net upward adjustment is warranted. Sale 8 is a parcel with a greater density than what we have opined as representative. It is adjusted downward for this factor. It is adjusted upward for its required site improvement costs. The overall adjustment is upward. Summary The preceding sales range in sale price from $8,486 to $27,684 per acre. The lower end of the range is represented by less improved acreage. The upper end of the range is represented by sales in superior locations or having greater improvements. The preceding acreage sales have been analyzed and adjusted as noted above. After making this analysis, and taking into account current supply/demand conditions for residential land and all other pertinent factors, we are of the opinion that the market value of representative residential improved acreage, as defined, is $30,000 per acre. This is above the range of the sales but is considered appropriate based on our previous analysis and especially taking into account the definition of the improved acreage (and its related cost to deliver such a property). Value per Lot Analysis It should be noted that our valuation of $30,000 per acre reflects a value range of $15,000 to $20,000 per lot, based on our estimated representative density of 1.5 to 2.0 lots per acre. This value per lot range is above the parameters indicated by the comparable sales. The price per lot unit of comparison is typically very meaningful during stable market because a developer is usually more concerned with how many lots are possible, the potential sale price of the lots and/or homes and the profit potential per lot. In today’s unstable market conditions, entitlements do not carry the weight that they once did. The price per acre is given primary emphasis in this assignment because it would be speculative to assume a specific density. Nevertheless, density is a pertinent factor and it has been given consideration in our price per acre analysis. However, it is not the only factor that affects single family land values. All pertinent elements of comparison have been taken into account. 28 Supplemental Analysis – Price per acre indicated by individual lot prices. We have also considered the sale of individual lots in the Yorkville area. The range of indicated sale prices per acre is $14,250 to $125,389. This is a very wide range but should be expected in unstable market conditions. The top end of the range is represented by the oldest sale cited. Prices have declined since this sale occurred. Many of these following sales are in well and septic areas. Thus, while improved for a residential structure, they do not meet the criterion of improved acreage as defined in this assignment. The smaller lots within the corporate limits do meet this criterion but are considerably smaller than the subject. Thus, they would be adjusted downward for this size differential. SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LOT SALES Sale No. Location Sale Date Sale Price S/F Size Indicated Acre Size Sale Price per S/F Indicated Sale Price per Acre Comments 1 1979 Meadowlake Country Hills Feb-12 $14,000 12,150 0.279 $1.15 $50,193 Relatively standard lot sold by foreclosing lender. 2 362 Westwind Briarwood Dec-11 $8,500 17,500 0.402 $0.49 $21,158 Standard lot. Initial asking price of $26,000, reduced to $9,500. 3 Lot 124 Country Hills Jul-11 $23,000 9,600 0.220 $2.40 $104,363 Standard lot. Reported exercise of option. 4 Lot 46 Audrey Lane Rosehill Mar-12 $25,000 30,000 0.689 $0.83 $36,300 Standard lot, well and septic area. 5 7451 Fairway - Whitetail Ridge Mar-12 $34,000 33,000 0.758 $1.03 $44,880 Golf course community, well and septic required. Allows walkout, backs to golf course. Reported short sale. 6 Lot 23 Tanglewood Trail Jan-12 $14,250 43,560 1.000 $0.33 $14,250 Foreclosure sale of of in area of well and septic sites. Elevated lot overlooks valley. 7 Lot 43 Danielle Fields of Farm Colony May-12 $27,000 43,560 1.000 $0.62 $27,000 Short sale of lot in well and septic area. 8 461 Omaha Drive Heartland Circle Jul-10 $30,000 10,422 0.239 $2.88 $125,389 Older sale of an infill lot. Bank owned - foreclosure. 75' foot frontage. 29 Also considered is an April 2012 sale of 14 improved lots along Cryder Way in the Grande Reserve planned unit development. Each lot is reportedly about one quarter acre, or 11,200 square feet. This bulk lot purchase sold for $70,000, or $5,000 per lot. The sale price per acre was $19,444. This was a bank owned property originally listed for sale at $98,000. The analysis of individual lots compared to acreage should not be construed as directly comparable. Nonetheless, we believe certain parallels exist and the analysis offers support for our conclusion found on Page 27. EXCERPTS FROM ORDINANCE 2009-50 QUALIFICATIONS OF TIMOTHY J. SULLIVAN, MAI, SRA EXPERIENCE Real Estate Appraiser since 1978. President and owner of DAVID W. PHILLIPS & COMPANY, specializing in the appraisal of multi-family, commercial, industrial, and special use properties. Previous employment included Vice-President with Purcell & Phillips Appraisal Corporation, 1982 to 1991; Staff Appraiser, R. J. Schmitt and Associates, Inc., Real Estate Appraisers/Consultants, 1978 to 1982. EDUCATION University of Illinois at Urbana, Bachelor of Arts Degree in Finance, 1978. Specialized courses and seminars in real estate analysis and valuation include: University of Illinois Principles of Real Estate and Urban Economics Real Estate Investment and Analysis Real Estate Evaluation and Appraisal Appraisal Institute: Introduction to Appraising Real Property Principles of Income Property Appraising Narrative Report Writing Seminar Applied Residential Property Appraising Evaluating Residential Construction Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Parts A and B Standards of Professional Practice Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation Valuation Analysis and Report Writing Condemnation Appraising: Principles and Applications Various seminars sponsored by the Appraisal Institute, the Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals, and other real estate organizations. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND AFFILIATIONS Member - Appraisal Institute - MAI designation awarded in 2000, SRA designation awarded in 1989. State Certified Real Estate Appraiser - State of Illinois Certificate No. 553.000278; Expires September 30, 2013 Registered Real Estate Broker - State of Illinois Summary-Report of Findings Spring 2009 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION....................................................................................3 METHODOLOGY..............................................................................................................6 RESULTS............................................................................................................................7 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................25 APPENDIX........................................................................................................................26 3 INTRODUCTION The Office of Recreation and Park Resources (ORPR) at the University of Illinois conducted a survey on Land Dedication Ordinances in order to update the previous study conducted in June 2003 by Dr. Ted Flickinger and John Comerio for the Illinois Association of Park Districts. The purpose of the survey was to gain up-to-date information that would help assist agencies, communities and counties that are considering an ordinance gain valuable knowledge based on the experiences shared by the respondents as well as assist agencies with an adopted land cash donation ordinance to better understand how their ordinance compares to others. This report is broken up into two sections. The first section is background information that discusses the importance of Land Dedication Ordinances and provides a history of how they have developed. The second section describes the survey we conducted including the data collection, analysis, and discussions/conclusions. We truly appreciate all of the feedback and information that agencies provided us in order to make this report. If you have any question, comments, or suggestions please contact Robin Hall or Dina Izenstark at the ORPR. The contact information is listed below. Office of Recreation and Park Resources 104 Huff Hall 1206 S. Fourth St. Champaign, IL 61820 217/333-4410 http://www.orpr.uiuc.edu/ 4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION “City parks and open spaces improve our physical and psychological health, strengthen our communities, and make our cities and neighborhoods more attractive to live and work” (Sherer, 2003, p.6). Research has illustrated that parks and open spaces provide a number of benefits to community members both directly and indirectly. Recent studies have found park use directly benefits individuals psychologically, socially, and physically as it decreased stress, fostered social interaction and increased physical activity (Bedimo-Rung et al., 2005; Godbey et al., 1998; Kweon, 1998). In addition, parks indirectly improved individuals quality of life through the numerous environmental benefits provided to an area including reduced noise pollution, regulated microclimate, and improved air quality (Bolund & Hunhammar, 1999). As open land continues to be developed it is increasingly important to preserve and protect open spaces in the community. In order to maintain the high quality of life that parks and open spaces provide for present and future residents without raising taxes, cities can enact a Land Cash Donation Ordinance (also know as Land Dedication Ordinance) which allows communities to preserve open space for public parks and schools (Bernard & Nance, 1996). A Land Cash Donation Ordinance is a law enacted by a municipal body (that could state), “…any developer building within the city limits or 1.5 miles of the city line and seeking to annex to the city, as a condition of being granted zoning approval, had to dedicate land (in amounts to be determined by formula) to the school district and to the park district for new school sites and parks (Bernard & Nance, 1996, p.1)”. The first agency to establish a land-cash donation ordinance was the Naperville Park District in 1972. In 2008, 95 agencies reported having adopted a land-cash donation ordinance within their community or county in the state of Illinois (Flickinger & Comerio, 2003; Hall, Huang, & Izenstark, 2008). Land-cash donation ordinances provide life long benefits to a community as many agencies have reported their value in developing parks, meeting the needs of the community, providing resources for capital improvements, and much more (Flickinger & Comerio, 2003). The amount of land that the developer donates is dependent upon terms set forth in the ordinance adopted by the city. The National Recreation and Park Association recommend that 10 acres of land is donated per 1,000 residents (Monson, 2006). In the cases in which it is impossible for the developer to donate land they are required to provide cash in lieu of land. The net worth of land is different among each town and city. However, in 2008 the Office of Recreation and Park Resources and IDNR conducted a survey and found 95 agencies adopted a Land-Cash Donation Ordinance and of the agencies that had a required amount of land developers were required to donate, 35% of agencies required 10 acres, 19% of agencies required 5.5 acres, and six agencies required 15 acres to be donated per 1000 residents in the population. Additionally, the average amount of dollars developers donated varied greatly from community to community and within different regions of the state. Please see attached appendix in order to get a better idea of the number of acres per dollar amount that land-cash donation ordinances 5 required developers to provide agencies (Flickinger & Comerio, 2003; Hall, Huang, & Izenstark, 2008). Agencies that have adopted a land-cash donation ordinance have provided many suggestions to other agencies considering adopting an ordinance. Some of the most common suggestions include: 1) land values should be regularly updated to ensure adequate funds are supplied to help meet parks and recreation demands of the community, 2) active use land is only acceptable which does not account for detention/retention land for credit, and 3) that park agency officials should be involved with the city in the planning process. One example, of a county taking advantage of these suggestions is in Kendall County. In 2001, Kendall County updated their counties land-cash ordinance from $45,000 per acre to $98,000 per acre (Scott, 2005). This means, if a developer wants to contribute cash to a taxing body instead of donating land they are required to contribute $98,000 per acre. Additionally, their previous ordinance required that developers donate “high and dry” land or land that isn’t considered floodplain or wetlands, so the district can use it as park or forest preserve land. The new ordinance does not consider land in a flood plain worthy as a creditable land donation unless the district deems it valuable to them for some future project, such as a trail system (Scott, 2005, p.1). Overall, these findings clearly illustrate the importance of land-cash donation ordinances in preserving the quality of life in the community for a number of park and recreation agencies. 6 METHODOLOGY In Spring 2009, the Office of Recreation and Park Resources conducted a survey of 98 selected agencies that had previously indicated the adoption of a land dedication ordinance based on records from the IAPD. Using survey monkey, 98 agencies received an e-mail asking them to participate in the Land Dedication Ordinance survey on-line. Initially 41 agencies had responded to the survey. A follow-up e-mail was sent to all participants who had not yet responded resulting in 17 more agencies that participated in the survey. There were a total of 58 agencies that participated in the survey resulting in a 59% response rate. A complete list of the 58 agencies that had participated in the survey is included in the Appendix along with an updated chart of the 98 selected agencies that had previously indicated from past surveys the adoption of a Land Dedication Ordinance. A copy of the questionnaire is attached to the next page followed by an analysis of each survey question based on participant’s results. 7 SURVEY Please take a few moments to answer the following questions; your input is most appreciated. 1. Does your agency still have a Land-Cash Donation Ordinance currently in place? 1a. If Yes, what year was it enacted? When was the last time it was updated? What was the result of the update? 2. Based on the ordinance, what acreage amount are developers required to donate per 1000 residents? 3. What is the total acreage of land your agency has accumulated as a direct result of this policy? 4. Based on the ordinance, what dollar amount are developers required to donate in lieu of an acre of land? 5. Does your agency figure the cost of land or the cost of land plus improvements in calculating the dollar amount for cash in lieu of? 6. Is your ordinance geared toward neighborhood parks, community or regional parks? 7. Do you have any trouble receiving city money or cooperation? 8. Please identify any limitations or conditions of the ordinance that impact your agency? 9. Do you have any suggestions for agencies considering a land-cash donation ordinance? 10. Please explain the value and benefits of the land-cash donation ordinance to your agency. 11. Would you like us to e-mail you a copy of the final report? 12. If you have a copy of your ordinance or any other supplemental information that you believe will assist us or other agencies please e-mail us a copy at rrhall@illinois.edu or send it to: ORPR-University of Illinois 104 Huff Hall 1206 S. Fourth St. Champaign, IL 61820 8 RESULTS OF THE SURVEY Question 1. Does your agency still have a Land-Cash Donation Ordinance currently in place? Fifty-eight organizations (59% response rate) responded to the survey indicating that their agency still had an active land dedication ordinance in their community. Question 1a. If Yes, what year was it enacted? When was the last time it was updated? What was the result of the update? Thirty-five organizations (61%) indicated when the land dedication was enacted while Sixty- three percent of the sample (n=36 agencies) indicated the last time the ordinance was updated. Results of the update entailed an increase in acreage, value of an acre of land, and/or an adjustment of fees. See below for respondent’s responses. Increase in Money for Development • Increase in the fair market value of land for determining contributions in lieu of park land dedications from $205,000 (from 2004 revision) to $239,000 and to maintain the estimated cost of subdivision improvements per acre at $45,000 for a combined total of $284,000 • An increase to the amount... • Adjustment on the fee • An increase from $234,400 per acre to $323,600 per acre • Increased to $100,000 per acre, from $75,000 • To adjust land prices to market levels • An increase of 6% in the value of an acre of land to a total of $87,000 per acre • In 2008, the cash in lieu of land requirement was increased from 185,000 to 240,500 an acre for land located in the city. Outside the city, it is 175,000 per acre • Adjusted the cash value if cash in lieu of land • Increase “fair market value” of land • Increase of cash donation amount by $20,000 per acre but none of it is passed on the Park District. It is kept by the village • Donation is based on price land sold for • As a result of community being mostly built-out, land in lieu of was eliminated in favor of a process that better considered property in subdivisions. Now, cash only and dollar amounts were updated to per unit vs. per acre and revised to reflect current building trends (i.e., town homes, multi-family units) • An increase in the value of an acre of land • More specific guidelines and cost per acre 9 Results of Agencies most recent Land Dedication Ordinance Updates (Continued) Increase in Land and Amount of Money per Acre • Additional funds per size of the development • Increased acreage and cash contributions • Increase in cash value for land in lieu of land Increase in the amount of land to be donated more controls on what District would accept, or expect with the donation • Increased dollar per acre and land donation per person • Change in acreage requirement, update per acre $$ in lieu of amount, per acre initial improvements fee and population density table • Re-assessment of Land Values • 10 acres per 1,000 residents with a cash value of $110,000 per acre • Increase in the value per acre, increase in numbers of acres/1000 population as well as the inclusion of several other conditional requirements the developer is obligated to follow • Increase in fees and acreage • Increased acre value • Increase to acreage and land value 10 2. Based on the ordinance, what acreage amount are developers required to donate per 1000 residents? Thirty-nine agencies (67.4%) responded to this question and three of those responses were invalid. The majority of the sample indicated the required acreage was 10 acres per 1000 residents (17 agencies; 43.5%) or 15 acres per 1000 residents (5 agencies; 12.8%) per 1000 residents. Figure 1 indicates the respondents supplied acreage amounts from the survey. Figure 1. Figure 2. From the population of agencies that have land dedication ordinances according to IAPD records (n=98), the majority of agencies reported 10 acres per 1000 residents (40 agencies; 40%). Eleven out of the 99 agencies results were considered invalid due to outliers and/or results that were not available. Figure 2 indicates respondents supplied acreage amounts from all agencies that have reported having a Land Dedication Ordinance according to IAPD records. N=38 Sample Results of Acreage Amount Developers are Required to Donate per 1000 Residents 10 acres 45%5.5 acres 8% Other 34% 15 acres 13% 15 acres 10 acres 5.5 acres Other 11 Population Results Developers are Required to Donate per 1000 Residents 10 acres 42% 5-5.5 acres 16% 15 acres 6%Invalid Results 12% Other (1-6.5 acres) 9% Other (7-15 acres) 15% Figure 2. 3. What is the total acreage of land your agency has accumulated as a direct result of this policy? Of the 36 respondents (62%) that answered this question there was a wide range of responses. 13 respondents indicated they did not know the total acreage of land that had been accumulated as a direct result of the Land Dedication Ordinance. The lowest number of acres that was accrued was .65 (Pleasant Dale Park District) while the highest number of areas accrued was 1,048 (Naperville Park District). A relationship between length of time since Land Dedication was enacted and number of acres accrued appeared to exist among many agencies. Please see Table 2 in the Appendix for exact figures among each agency. 4. Based on the ordinance, what dollar amount are developers required to donate in lieu of an acre of land? The dollar amount developers are required to donate in lieu of an acre of land severely differed among the agencies. Thirty-six respondents (62%) answered the question with a range of dollar amounts from $20,000 to $323,600. See Table 1 for exact figures among each agency. The answers to questions 1-4 from respondents are located in Table 1 on the next page. This chart illustrates the 99 agencies that had previously or currently indicated they had a land- dedication ordinance along with the year it was enacted, the year the ordinance was updated, the acreage amount developers are required to donate per 1000 residents, the dollar amount developers are required to donate in lieu of an acre of land, and the total acreage of land the agency has accumulated as a direct result of their Land Dedication Ordinance. N=99 Ta b l e 1 . C o m m u n i t y A g e n c i e s w i t h a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 12 # Ag e n c y Y e a r E n a c t e d Y e a r U p d a t e d A c r e s D o l l a r s P o p u l a t i o n Se r v e d Co u n t y 1 Ar l i n g t o n H e i g h t s P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 2 n / a 1 0 1 6 5 , 0 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 C o o k 2 Au r o r a , C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t ( C i t y ) 1 9 6 9 ( L a s t u p d a t e 4/ 2 0 0 8 ) n/ a 1 0 7 1 , 6 0 8 1 7 5 , 9 5 2 K a n e , D u P a g e , Ke n d a l l , W i l l 3 Ba r t l e t t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 6 n / a 1 0 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 C o o k , D u p a g e , Ka n e 4 Ba t a v i a P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 K a n e 5 Be e c h e r ( V i l l a g e ) 1 9 9 9 n / a 5 6 0 , 0 0 0 4 1 0 8 W i l l 6 Be l v i d e r e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 9 2 0 0 7 6 . 5 8 4 , 3 1 3 i n C o u n t y 12 0 , 0 0 0 i n C i t y 32 0 0 0 B o o n e 7 Bl o o m i n g d a l e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 4 N o u p d a t e 5 . 5 6 5 , 0 0 0 / a c r e 2 4 0 0 0 D u P a g e 8 Bl o o m i n g t o n P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 19 8 7 n / a 1 0 A c r e s M a r k e t V a l u e 7 5 0 0 0 M c L e a n 9 Bo l i n g b r o o k P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 0 s 2 0 0 4 1 0 $ 1 6 0 0 0 0 T o t a l o f w h i c h on l y $ 7 0 , 0 0 0 i s g i v e n t o th e p a r k d i s t r i c t 71 0 0 0 W i l l 10 Bo o n e C o u n t y C o n s e r v a t i o n D i s t r i c t O r i g i n a l l y i n t h e la t e 1 9 8 0 ’ s b y t h e Co u n t y n/ a I t v a r i e s T h i s a l s o v a r i e s d e p e n d i n g on w h i c h e n t i t y ’ s or d i n a n c e i s i n p l a c e 41 7 8 6 B o o n e 11 Bu f f a l o G r o v e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 1 n / a 1 0 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 4 3 7 0 0 L a k e , C o o k 12 Bu t t e r f i e l d P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 6 n / a 5 . 5 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 D u P a g e 13 By r o n P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 7 5 8 4 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O g l e 14 Ca r o l S t r e a m P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 0 ’ s n / a 4 1 2 5 , 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 D u P a g e 15 Ca r y P a r k D i s t r i c t P r i o r t o 1 9 9 4 n / a 1 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 2 6 2 5 2 M c H e n r y 16 Ch a n n a h o n P a r k D i s t r i c t M a r c h 2 0 0 5 n / a 9 5 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 W i l l 17 Cr e t e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 1 n / a 5 . 5 n / a 7 2 0 0 W i l l 18 Cr y s t a l L a k e P a r k D i s t r i c t R e v i s e d i n 2 0 0 5 n / a 1 0 1 3 5 , 0 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 M c H e n r y 19 De e r f i e l d P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 3 H a s n ’ t b e e n 1 5 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 1 8 5 0 0 L a k e , C o o k 20 De e r P a r k ( V i l l a g e ) 2 0 0 3 n / a 1 0 9 8 , 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 L a k e , C o o k 21 De K a l b C o u n t y F o r e s t P r e s e r v e D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 6 n / a 1 0 P r e s e n t L a n d P r i c e s 8, 0 0 0 ~ 1 2 , 0 0 0 / a c r e 10 0 , 0 0 0 D e K a l b 22 De K a l b P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 7 1 1 . 5 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 D e K a l b 23 Do w n e r s G r o v e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 5 n / a 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 D u P a g e Ta b l e 1 . C o m m u n i t y A g e n c i e s w i t h a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 13 # Ag e n c y Y e a r E n a c t e d Y e a r U p d a t e d A c r e s D o l l a r s P o p u l a t i o n Se r v e d Co u n t y 24 Du n d e e T o w n s h i p P a r k D i s t r i c t U n c l e a r o r i g i n a l da t e b u t p r i o r t o 19 9 2 20 0 7 1 0 1 1 0 , 0 0 0 5 3 2 0 0 K a n e 25 Ed w a r d s v i l l e P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 20 0 0 n / a 1 0 % O f l a n d f o r gr e e n s p a c e m u s t be i n c l u d e d n e w de v e l o p m e n t s 12 , 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 M a d i s o n 26 El g i n P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 1 9 9 8 V a l u e o f a n a c r e of l a n d u p d a t e d ea c h y e a r 10 8 7 , 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 K a n e 27 El m h u r s t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 3 2 0 0 6 1 0 . 6 2 1 , 2 5 0 s i n g l e f a m i l y ; 1 , 0 0 0 to w n h o m e ; 9 0 0 m u l t i - fa m i l y 44 0 0 0 D u P a g e 28 Fo x V a l l e y P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 2 - A u r o r a n / a 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 K a n e , D u P a g e , Ke n d a l l , W i l l 29 Fr a n k f o r t P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 6 R e v i s e d n / a 1 0 1 3 0 , 0 0 0 1 6 5 0 0 W i l l 30 Fr a n k f o r t S q u a r e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 7 2 0 0 6 1 0 8 0 , 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 W i l l 31 Ge n o a T o w n s h i p P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 3 n / a 1 0 1 0 5 , 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 D e K a l b 32 Gl e n E l l y n P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 9 2 0 0 7 5 . 5 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 D u P a g e 33 Gl e n d a l e H e i g h t s P a r k a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 19 5 9 1 9 9 6 1 0 7 5 , 0 0 0 3 2 4 0 0 D u P a g e 34 Gl e n v i e w P a r k D i s t r i c t P r e - 1 9 9 0 n / a 1 a c r e p e r 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 K p e r a c r e ( T h e G l e n ) & $ 4 0 0 K p e r a c r e ( a l l ot h e r l o c a t i o n s ) 57 1 7 9 C o o k 35 Gr a y s l a k e C o m m u n i t y P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 1 2 0 0 5 1 5 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 L a k e 36 Gu r n e e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 9 n / a 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 1 7 0 L a k e 37 Ha n o v e r P a r k P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 2 2 0 0 4 1 0 V a l u e o f p r o j e c t l a n d 3 2 6 0 0 C o o k , D u P a g e 38 Hi g h l a n d P a r k , P a r k D i s t r i c t o f 1 2 / 9 / 0 3 In t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l Im p a c t F e e Ag r e e m e n t n / a N / A N / A ; L a n d c o n t r i b u t i o n s in l i e u o f d e v e l o p m e n t im p a c t f e e o p t i o n 31 3 6 5 L a k e 39 Hi n s d a l e P a r k a n d R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 4 1 5 C a s h e q u a l t o f a i r m a r k e t va l u e o f t h e 1 5 a c r e s p l u s fe e s 18 0 0 0 D u P a g e , C o o k 40 Ho m e r G l e n ( V i l l a g e ) A d o p t e d i n 2 0 0 1 ; am e n d e d i n 2 0 0 6 n / a 1 1 a c r e s / t h o u s a n d 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 / a c r e 2 5 0 0 0 W i l l Ta b l e 1 . C o m m u n i t y A g e n c i e s w i t h a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 14 # Ag e n c y Y e a r E n a c t e d Y e a r U p d a t e d A c r e s D o l l a r s P o p u l a t i o n Se r v e d Co u n t y 41 Ho m e w o o d - F l o s s m o o r P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 8 n / a 1 n / a 3 0 0 0 0 C o o k 42 Il l i o p o l i s T o w n s h i p 7 / 1 / 1 9 8 1 n / a n / a 1 2 0 9 8 2 S a n g a m o n 43 It a s c a P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a n / a 0 . 1 2 , 0 0 , 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 D u p a g e 44 Jo l i e t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 8 n / a 7 . 5 f o r e v e r y 3 3 3 lo t s / u n i t s 86 , 5 8 6 14 5 , 0 0 0 Wi l l 45 Ka n e C o u n t y F o r e s t P r e s e r v e D i s t r i c t 0 5 / 1 0 / 1 9 9 4 n / a 1 0 . 0 0 ( 1 . 2 5 / s c h o o l pa r k ; 1 . 0 0 ne i g h b o r h o o d p a r k ; 1. 2 5 d i s t r i c t - w i d e or p l a y f i e l d ; 2 . 0 0 co m m u n i t y - w i d e re c r e a t i o n p a r k ; an d , 4 . 5 0 C o u n t y - wi d e f o r e s t pr e s e r v e ) Ba s e d o n “ f a i r m a r k e t va l u e ” - $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 p e r a c r e 45 0 0 0 0 K a n e 46 Ke n d a l l C o u n t y F o r e s t P r e s e r v e D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 8 2 0 0 6 1 0 1 1 0 , 5 5 4 9 6 8 1 8 K e n d a l l 47 La k e B l u f f P a r k D i s t r i c t R e v i s e d 2 0 0 4 n / a 1 0 5 4 0 , 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 L a k e 48 La k e F o r e s t P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t Un k n o w n n / a 3 9 5 8 8 1 5 , 6 6 8 p e r d w e l l i n g u n i t 2 0 6 8 1 L a k e 49 La k e i n t h e H i l l s P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t n/ a n / a 1 0 n / a 2 9 1 9 5 M c H e n r y 50 La k e V i l l a ( V i l l a g e ) U p d a t e d 10 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 2 n / a 1 5 8 0 , 0 0 0 8 6 0 2 L a k e 51 La k e Z u r i c h P a r k a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t n/ a 2 0 0 5 1 5 V a r i e s p e r u n i t s i z e At t a c h e d a n d D e t a c h e d Si n g l e f a m i l y / l o w a n d hi g h d e n s i t y a p t s ) 18 5 0 0 L a k e 52 La n - O a k P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a n / a 5 F a i r m a r k e t o f t h e un i m p r o v e d g r o s s a v e r a g e 27 0 0 0 C o o k 53 Le m o n t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 7 1 0 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 8 7 0 0 C o o k , D u P a g e , Wi l l 54 Li n d e n h u r s t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 3 n / a 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 L a k e 55 Li s l e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 9 n / a 5 . 5 v a r i e s 3 2 0 0 0 D u P a g e 56 Lo c k p o r t T o w n s h i p P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a 2 0 0 4 1 0 D e p e n d s o n s c h o o l d i s t r i c t th a t p r o p e r t y i s i n . Ra n g e s f r o m $ 3 2 , 0 0 0 p e r ac r e t o $ 1 2 5 , 0 0 0 p e r a c r e 70 0 0 0 W i l l Ta b l e 1 . C o m m u n i t y A g e n c i e s w i t h a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 15 # Ag e n c y Y e a r E n a c t e d Y e a r U p d a t e d A c r e s D o l l a r s P o p u l a t i o n Se r v e d Co u n t y 57 Ma n h a t t a n P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 1 n / a 1 0 . 8 9 7 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 W i l l 58 Ma n t e n o ( V i l l a g e ) 2 0 0 5 n / a 8 . 8 4 0 0 0 0 8 2 0 0 K a n k a k e e 59 Ma t t e s o n P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t n/ a n / a n / a n / a 1 7 0 0 0 C o o k 60 Mc H e n r y P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 19 7 0 O r i g i n a l ; 20 0 7 r e v i s i o n n / a 1 5 1 0 7 , 5 8 6 2 4 4 9 3 M c H e n r y 61 Me d i n a h P a r k D i s t r i c t W e o p e r a t e w i t h i n 3 j u r i s d i c t i o n s n / a a l l 3 a r e 5 . 5 V a r i e s a m o n g ju r i s d i c t i o n s 93 0 0 D u P a g e 62 Mo r t o n G r o v e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 8 n / a 1 0 n / a 2 3 0 0 0 C o o k 63 Mo u n t P r o s p e c t P a r k D i s t r i c t U n k n o w n n / a 9 . 1 6 3 2 5 7 ( 1 7 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 / 5 2 2 ) 5 7 0 0 0 C o o k 64 Mu n d e l e i n P a r k a n d R e c r e a t i o n D i s t r i c t U n k n o w n n / a * * * $ 1 , 5 0 0 p e r re s i d e n t n/ a 3 6 0 0 0 L a k e 65 Na p e r v i l l e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 2 20 0 7 8 . 6 3 2 3 , 6 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 D u p a g e , W i l l 66 Ne w L e n o x C o m m u n i t y P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 7 - 1 9 9 8 n / a 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 W i l l 67 No r m a l P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 1 9 7 5 n / a 1 0 a c r e s 4 5 , 0 0 0 ; D e p e n d s o n De v e l o p m e n t 50 5 1 9 M c L e a n 68 No r t h b r o o k P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 8 n / a 5 $ 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 C o o k 69 Oa k b r o o k T e r r a c e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 7 H a s n ’ t b e e n 5 . 5 1 2 5 0 0 0 + $ 3 1 0 0 0 ( c o s t o f im p r o v e m e n t ) 30 0 0 D u P a g e 70 O’ F a l l o n P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 20 0 3 2 0 0 7 6 1 0 0 2 p e r l o t 2 6 0 0 0 S t . C l a i r 71 Or l a n d P a r k R e c r e a t i o n a n d P a r k s De p a r t m e n t 19 9 1 1 9 9 6 F a i r m a r k e t va l u e a n d i n 20 0 8 f o r c o d e se c t i o n 7 1 3 4 , 6 8 9 6 0 0 0 0 C o o k 72 Os w e g o l a n d P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 0 n / a 1 0 1 1 8 , 9 7 6 i n c r e a s i n g 4 % ea c h J a n . 1 35 0 0 0 K e n d a l l , W i l l 73 Ot t a w a R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 2 0 0 6 n / a n / a n / a 1 8 5 0 0 L a S a l l e 74 Pa l a t i n e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 7 2 0 0 6 9 . 1 8 n o t i n c l u d i n g sc h o o l a c r e s 13 5 , 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 0 C o o k 75 Pa r k F o r e s t R e c r e a t i o n a n d P a r k s De p a r t m e n t 19 7 6 2 0 0 5 1 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 f o r l a n d p l u s 10 , 0 0 0 f o r i n i t i a l im p r o v e m e n t 23 4 6 2 C o o k / W i l l 76 Pe o r i a P a r k D i s t r i c t ( P l e a s u r e D r i v e w a y & Pa r k D i s t r i c t ) 19 7 2 n / a 1 $ 5 6 / 4 2 / 3 5 p e r si n g l e / a t t a c h e d / d e p a r t m e t n 13 5 0 0 0 P e o r i a 77 Pl a i n f i e l d T o w n s h i p P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 8 n / a 1 0 1 3 9 7 2 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 W i l l , K e n d a l l Ta b l e 1 . C o m m u n i t y A g e n c i e s w i t h a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 16 # Ag e n c y Y e a r E n a c t e d Y e a r U p d a t e d A c r e s D o l l a r s P o p u l a t i o n Se r v e d Co u n t y 78 Pl e a s a n t D a l e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 5 ( w i t h B u r r Ri d g e o n l y ) 20 0 5 5 . 5 $2 3 9 , 0 0 0 + c o s t o f su b d i v i s i o n im p r o v e m e n t s p e r a c r e at $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 f o r a co m b i n e d t o t a l o f $2 8 4 , 0 0 0 79 Ro l l i n g M e a d o w s P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a n / a n / a n / a 2 6 0 0 0 C o o k 80 Ro m e o v i l l e R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 4 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 W i l l 81 Ro s c o e ( V i l l a g e ) 1 9 9 2 n / a 7 9 3 , 9 9 7 9 6 5 2 W i n n e b a g o 82 Ro s e l l e P a r k D i s t r i c t M a y - 0 5 n / a 5 . 5 N o l e s s t h a n $1 7 5 , 0 0 0 / A c r e 23 0 0 0 D u P a g e 83 Ro u n d L a k e A r e a P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 3 n / a 1 5 8 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 L a k e 84 Sa i n t C h a r l e s P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 9 2 0 0 8 1 0 2 4 0 , 5 0 0 a n d 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 f o r ou t s i d e t h e c i t y 46 0 0 0 K a n e 85 Sc h a u m b u r g P a r k D i s t r i c t V i l l a g e O f Sc h a u m b r u g Or d i n a n c e n / a n / a $ 1 5 0 t o $ 3 0 0 p e r u n i t 7 6 0 0 0 C o o k 86 So u t h E l g i n P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 19 9 7 1 9 9 9 1 0 . 5 2 0 , 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 K a n e 87 Sp r i n g G r o v e ( V i l l a g e ) n / a n / a N / A 3 0 , 0 0 0 4 9 7 8 M c H e n r y 88 St r e a m w o o d P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a n / a 1 0 A / 1 0 0 0 8 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 / A 3 6 5 0 0 C o o k 89 St r e a t o r ( C i t y ) 2 0 0 6 n / a 5 . 5 3 4 , 8 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 L a S a l l e 90 Su g a r G r o v e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 5 n / a 1 0 8 0 , 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 K a n e 91 Sy c a m o r e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 8 1 1 . 5 c o m m u n i t y Pa r k 1 . 5 ne i g h b o r h o o d P a r k 12 2 0 0 0 1 4 9 0 0 D e k a l b 92 Ve r n o n H i l l s P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 0 ’ s n / a 1 0 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 L a k e 93 Wa r r e n v i l l e P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a 2 0 0 6 1 0 2 6 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 D u P a g e 94 Wa u c o n d a P a r k D i s t r i c t R e c e n t l y u p d a t e d in 2 0 0 6 n / a 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 L a k e 95 Wa u k e g a n P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 9 n / a 1 0 n / a 9 3 5 0 0 L a k e 96 We s t C h i c a g o P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 5 n / a 1 0 2 3 0 , 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 D u P a g e 97 We s t m o n t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 9 u p d a t e d n / a 4 1 2 5 , 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 D u P a g e 98 Wh e a t o n P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 1 n / a 5 . 5 1 5 0 0 0 0 6 1 5 0 0 D u P a g e 99 Yo r k v i l l e P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 19 9 6 n / a 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 K e n d a l l 17 Question 5. Does your agency figure the cost of land or the cost of land plus improvements in calculating the dollar amount for cash in lieu of? Thirty-five agencies (60.3%) responded to this question. Eighteen indicated the agency figures only the cost of land in calculating the dollar amount for cash in lieu of while seven agencies indicated they calculate the cost of land plus improvements. Nine agencies indicated that it was not up to the agency but determined by the City, village, or the school district while four respondents indicated no response available. Figure 3. Additional Comments • From the agreement, “The cash contribution in-lieu-of-land shall be based on the “fair market value” of the acres of land in the development. It has been determined that the present “fair market value” of such improved land in and surrounding the Village is ...” • Land – we have a Real estate transfer Tax that helps in development of the park space • Park Districts have no legal authority to assess impact fees such as these. The authority comes from the municipality. Therefore our village sets the cash equivalent. It’s based on the cost per acre • Fair market value of an acre of land in the area improved • Cost of land only for this figure. Another fee is charged for park development • Through annexation agreements we also require a capital impact fee to assist with development costs • Land only, but cash can be used for improvements if a neighborhood park already exists • It is a Village Ordinance and they negotiate with developers on our behalf • No. Ordinance only provides for acquisition, not development • No, it is calculated by the City of Oakbrook Terrace • Villages determine this. One village does both Calculated by the school district Calculation of the Dollar Amount for Cash in Lieu of? Cost of Land 49% Cost of Land Plus Improvements 19% Other 24% None 8% 18 Question 6. Is your ordinance geared toward neighborhood parks, community or regional parks? Of the 36 respondents who answered this question 72% (n=26) indicated their ordinance was geared toward both neighborhood and community parks. Twenty-two percent (n=8) reported the ordinance was geared toward only neighborhood parks. Five percent (n=2) indicated the ordinance was not geared toward parks but instead the organization was given cash donations for redevelopment because the community itself was mostly built out. Figure 4. Both Neighborhood and Community Parks 73% Cash Donation 6% Neighborhood Parks 21% Both Neighborhood and Community Parks Neighborhood Parks Cash Donation 19 Question 7. Do you have any trouble receiving city money or cooperation? Of the 36 respondents who answered this question the majority indicated they had no trouble with receiving city money or cooperation (77%, n=28). The most common reasons for not having any trouble receiving city money or cooperation was because the organization was part of the city or village as a Parks and Recreation Department. Among the organizations that did have trouble reasons that were stated included: • On occasion. We would have liked it reviewed and updated more often • The first writing of the ordinance was a very long process that lasted over two years but updates have been very easy • The ordinance does not provide an adequate amount of funding for land acquisition • It was never received until the ordinance was enacted. We lost out on many land/cash opportunities • Some times the villages are so accommodating to the developer that full donation in land, which must be high and dry, is not always an option • We only collect fees and land donations for new development within the unincorporated areas of the County. Each municipality has its own donations requirements and not all of our communities have park districts. The cities do not collect on our behalf • The money is received from the developer. The city will not issue permits until proof of payment is presented • We cover three municipalities, each is different. One municipality has a recreation department that receives the donation negating the Park District from receiving anything. Another will not pass a land/cash ordinance. The third is very cooperative • City before 2006 took all the land cash funds for city parks. Now the funds and land are to go to park district. We are pretty much land locked now though • They believe it is their money and they can give it or keep it based on their needs in a particular area • No. Developer donations come to the Park District after the development is totally completed. 20 Question 8. Please identify any limitations or conditions of the ordinance that impact your agency? A total of 33 agencies (56% response rate) answered this question. Seven indicated that they did not have any limitations to identify. The limitations of 25 agencies that had responses are listed below and vary across a number of different issues mainly relating to not having full control over spending the money in relation to where they have determined the greatest need for the money. Appropriation of Money • All funds must be spent on capital outdoor improvement in the Village of Burr Ridge within 3 years of when we receive it. Since our district encompasses multiple cities, if we need the money for a park outside the Village boundaries, we have to petition to use it there • The village doesn’t pass along the full amount of cash collected. They keep the lions share • The Village has a provision that they can put 1/3 of the money in an open space and wetland maintenance fund it they so determine the need • The Village negotiates on our behalf as well as the other taxing bodies • The city and or county enforce it at their discretion • Villages have the final say on what we will get. For the most part they listen to us, but they still want the development • All funds go to City. We must ask them in writing and state what project will be funded. City administrator approves • We do not control it Issues with Ordinance • Limitations are dictated by village ordinance • Be sure to update the ordinance regularly. It is easy to fall behind on land values • Part of our park district is located in an unincorporated area of Oakbrook Terrace. If the development is with the city limits, our ordinance requires us to purchase land within the city limits rather than in an unincorporated area • Ordinance does not provide an adequate amount of funding to provide present or future open space/park/recreation space • Age restricted communities are not clearly identified in the ordinance. Credit for private open space is not clearly defined. We have spent a large amount of money in legal fees related to these two issues Issues with Value of Land and/or Money Received • Open space is not the problem. Development and improvements are difficult • Value not keeping pace with inflation • The Park District does not believe the village dollar amount fairly reflects the price of an 21 • They can receive up to 50% credit for providing open space or neighborhood owned park to the neighborhood. It’s usually small space that is not used much by residents • Quality and location of land donations • Our community is very built up, and very few opportunities for further development exist Additional Limitations • Assisted Living • If the land/development is already annexed, and there is a repurposing to residential we do not see any donation. We are impacted by population, but do not get land/resources to service this population • We are largely land locked and relatively land rich, so receive mostly cash for small and infill development • Parks and Recreation department is a part of the Village acre of ground in Palatine. Some parcels in Palatine are now priced at $750,000 per acre • The ordinance does not really have a benefit to my agency as we do not receive the benefit from the ordinance. The Forest Preserve District and School Districts are the primary beneficiaries. In some select instances a Park District might benefit, but more times than not the open space components goes to the county Forest Preserve District. Any limitations would affect the benefiting district and not my department. The use of the funds is limited to the purchase of land and or the construction of facilities (buildings, additions, on site improvements) that directly benefit the school (or open space areas and parks) that service the population within the subdivisions from which the funds were generated. Under the statutes governing their use, if the funds are not expended within ten years from the date on which they were paid or collected, the districts must return them • It is actually a City Ordinance adopted on behalf of the Park District. We have no limitations now, however could realize some if relations between the City and Park District were to sour. • Not being updated on a regular basis is a limitation, and we are basically a land-locked community. 22 Question 9. Do you have any suggestions for agencies considering a land-cash donation ordinance to your agency? Thirty-one agencies (53.4%) offered suggestions for agencies who are considering adopting a land-cash donation ordinance. Most advice pertained to maintaining a relationship with municipal officials, finance, and/or land. Relationship with Municipal Officials • Make sure you have a good working arrangement with the city/village. Everyone must work together or it won’t work well • The city officials need to see a value for open space. With the economy, many are willing to be more forgiving in order to cater to developers • Work with your City/village, get as much as you can but make it reasonable for the developer so they do not have disincentive doing business. In land locked communities get cash. Do not take unwanted land as it likely has a problem for future development. • Try to be included as early in the planning process as possible and give the Planning Commission and City Council and County Board members copies of your Park Master Plan and Land Acquisition Plans • Work with village/city in regards to notifying developer of cash in lieu ordinance as well as collecting developer contributions • Yes, survey other surrounding districts. Get involved with the village and the developer during the initial planning process • Educate elected officials that create the ordinance on how this will benefit their community • Work very closely with your city when developing the ordinance and recruit their assistance and commitment to the tenants of the ordinance. Financial Advice • Take part land and part cash for development if funding is an issue • Make it as expensive as it would be allowed by your Board • If you need the land, get it. If not take the money to maintain the parks existing • Such an ordinance is a great tool for any Park and Recreation Dept. Allows capital money to go towards development rather than just acquisition • Make sure you conduct population generation studies and an analysis of land costs and acreage requirements of the benefiting districts so that the population/acreage ratios correlate directly to the impacts you are trying to offset • Develop a good relationship with your city council and city staff. GO for at least $ 261,000 per acre Land Advice • Do not include the value of wetlands or storm water management areas in your valuations. Don’t accept the developer’s wasteland as your open space donation • Make sure it specifies the quality of land to be donated, no credit for wetlands • I would recommend getting 10 acres per 1,000 23 • Develop a park plan to guide development 2. Review ordinance periodically • Make sure it is set up to provide acreage/1000 and that it provides both acquisition and development funding. Also, the land provided should not be the development outlets, gullies and stream buffers (undevelopable land under your present code). If the land is undevelopable for residential development, it probably is not very good land for any park use/development either • Set requirements high to start with. It’s harder to amend the ordinance later • Make sure you have the ability to choose land or cash. Do not accept sub-par land (i.e. detention) • Make sure an accurate current land value is used and the ordinance needs to be either updated annually automatically through an agreed upon acceptable formula or at the minimum be adjusted every 5 years to reflect currently land value Additional Suggestions • Remove credit for private open space from your ordinance, since it is difficult to quantify. Add demographic tables for age-restricted communities. • Do it! • Should have one if any potential of developments • It’s a must, even if you do not have a lot of development going on • Do it before the growth • Do your homework and be aware of any new developments early on when they are being proposed to the county or city. Green space may be incorporated within the development much easier in the early stages and prior to permitting. Too late and you end up with unusable land or cash • Have something • No recreation agency should be without one • Make it mandatory that Park Agency controls whether cash or land and that money must be turned over within the same Quarter it is collected • Do not hesitate. Get an ordinance in place and do not be shy about thinking out of the box when inserting your requests for developers. 24 Question 10. Please explain the value and benefits of the land-cash donation ordinance to your agency? Thirty-four respondents (60%) provided valuable input on what some of the major benefits of having a land-cash donation ordinance is to their agency. The responses were categorized into three sub-dimensions: land, money for development, and additional suggestions. Land • The ordinance has allowed the Park District to add parks in the event of a land donation or accumulate cash for land purchases over the years. This has extended the capabilities of the District to delivery quality recreational services • The ability to provide more neighborhood parks and amenities at fewer costs to the village/department • It provides open space simultaneously with the development of the community • Without it we would not be able to continue to provide parks and facilities to our growing community • We have parks in every neighborhood that might not otherwise be there. • Best way to expand parks at no cost to the taxpayer. We have received more that a two million in cash which has been parlayed with OSLAD grants • It is the only way to obtain park land in new subdivisions for development. We may negotiate taking dry bottom detention areas in exchange for additional cash for development • As a result of this ordinance, 15 parks are available for public use. Cash given has assisted in the development of many park areas • We have received 43 acres of park land in neighborhoods and hundred’s of thousands of dollars for purchases of land • Helps to balance the impact of development. In the 1970’s and early 80’s, it was a good way to acquire park land • The ordinance has been a valuable tool in obtaining land/ or cash that can be used to satisfy the open space needs of new neighborhoods quicker than they may have been satisfied without the ordinance • The ordinance has allowed our district to obtain land through out town that we would not have been able to buy with our limited funds • Guarantees parkland for everyone forever • It may help us save some green space that is the last undeveloped land within our community and provide a natural setting and buffer for residents as well as ensure that the ecosystems are not completely disturbed. It also provides “teeth” legally that developers will have to put aside a portion for parks and recreation • The ordinance supplements our Capital Improvement Fund, which has been severely impacted by tax cap legislation. It has allowed us to place parks in newer parts of our territory without impacting traditional Capital Improvement funds. Money for Development • The money brought in by this fund has enabled us to provide multiple park improvements (resurface tennis courts, resurface basketball courts, refurbish baseball fields, install 25 baseball field lights, resurface walking paths, install aerators in our ponds, install a new playground, etc.) • Land that we wouldn’t normally have received, cash for projects on small pieces of land, etc. • Cash to make improvements and use with OSLAD grants • We are a small agency with a limited budget and are unable to provide capital dollars to purchase land or make improvements • We aver received significant dollars and hope to receive more • Monetary contributions have allowed for improvements in park(s) near the development • The present fee structure does not provide an adequate amount to be of any benefit • We have the ability to make big improvements when we get the donations • A fair and equitable way for new developers to pay their fair share of additional burdens • Much needed development capital that can be leveraged for OSLAD funding. Can only be used for the area and park site in question as interpreted by our Village. Additional Suggestions • The ordinance does not really have a benefit to my agency as none of the revenue generated goes into a general fund or other sources that would directly benefit this department. All monies collected go to the affected districts that can then use the funds to purchase land or construct improvements to benefit the residents of the developments from which the funds were generated • Recognizes the potential impact to the agency on services • While it has not produced large amounts of land or money, having the concept in place is important • Gives us flexibility • It is essential for our ability to serve the new residents • Per unit methodology works well in a built-out community that experiences resubdivisions rather than new development • Benefits are not to agency but to community • Only feasible way to include park systems through the community • We have received approximately 75,000 over a two year period 26 REFERENCES Bedimo-Rung, A.L., Mowen, A.J., & Cohen, D.A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health a conceptual model. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 28, 159-168. Bernard, M. & Nance, E. (1996). Land Cash Donation Ordinances Naperville Revisited and Today. Preserving Public Land. Retrieved http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/1996/ip960539.html. Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293-301. Flickinger, T., & Comerio, J., (2003). Illinois Association of Park Districts Land-Cash Donation Ordinance Survey Summary, Unpublished report, Illinois Association of Park Districts, Springfield IL. Godbey, G., Roy, M., Payne, L., & Orsega-Smith, E. (1998). The Relation between Health and Use of Local Parks. National Recreation Foundation. Kweon, B. S., Sullivan, W.C., & Wiley, A. (1998). Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment Behavior, 30, 832-858. Monson, M. (2006, Jan 13). Required land gifts for parks criticized. The News-Gazette. Retrieved March 7, 2006 from www.news-gazette.com. Sherer, P. (2003). The benefits of parks: Why Americans needs more city parks and open space. Retrieved November 10, 2007, from The Trust for Public Land Web site: http://www.tpl.org/content_documents/parks_for_people_Jul2005.pdf. Scott, T. (2005). Updated Kendall land-cash law approved measure more than doubles developer cost for cash contributions. Ledger-Sentinel. 6/23/2005. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from Ledger-Sentinel Web site: http://www.ledgersentinel.com/article.asp?a=4138. 27 AP P E N D I X Fi g u r e 5 . Nu m b e r o f C i t i e s w i t h i n e a c h C o u n t y t h a t h a v e a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n Or d i n a n c e 2 21 4 9 1 6 16 2 1 5 2 11 1 1 18 1 23 0510152025 B o o n e C o o k D e K a l b D u p a g e K a n e K a n k a k e e K e n d a l l L a k e L a S a l l e M a d i s o n M c H e n r y M c L e a n O g l e P e o r i a S a n g a m o n S t . C l a i r W i l l W i n n e b a g o Co u n t y Number of Cities 28 Table 2. Agencies that Responded to the Survey Agencies That Responded to the Survey Total Acres Accrued from Ordinance Arlington Heights Park District n/a Batavia Park District 150 of the current 358 they own Belvidere Park District 43 Bloomingdale Park District n/a Bolingbrook Park District 700 Boone County Conservation District n/a Buffalo Grove Park District n/a Byron Park District 1 Cary Park District n/a Channahon Park District n/a Deerfield Park District None DeKalb Park District n/a Downers Grove Park District n/a Dundee Township Park District 40 Elgin Parks and Recreation Department n/a Elmhurst Park District n/a Frankfort Park District 42 Genoa Township Park District n/a Glen Ellyn Park District n/a Glendale Heights (Village) n/a Glenview Park District n/a Grayslake Community Park District 180 Hanover Park Park District n/a Hinsdale Park and Recreation Department n/a Homewood-Flossmoor Park District n/a Joliet Park District 57 acres Kane County Forest Preserve District n/a Lake Zurich Park and Recreation Dept. n/a Lan-Oak Park District less than 2 Lemont Park District 14.5 Lindenhurst Park District n/a Lockport Township Park District 100+ Manteno (Village) n/a Matteson Parks and Recreation Department n/a McHenry Parks and Recreation Department n/a Mount Prospect Park District n/a Mundelein Park and Recreation District n/a Naperville Park District 1048 Oakbrook Terrace Park District n/a O'Fallon Parks and Recreation Department 10 Orland Park Recreation and Parks Department 150 Oswegoland Park District n/a Palatine Park District 37.5 Park Forest Recreation and Parks Department less than 5 Peoria Park District 25 Pleasant Dale Park District 0.65 Romeoville Recreation Department 184.5 29 Round Lake Area Park District 200 Saint Charles Park District 125 Schaumberg Park District n/a South Elgin Parks and Recreation Dept. 250 Spring Grove (Village) n/a Sycamore Park District 300+ Vernon Hills Park District n/a Warrenville Park District 0 Wauconda Park District n/a Westmont Park District n/a Wheaton Park District n/a KLOA, Inc. Transportation and Parking Planning Consultants 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 | Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 | f: 847-518-9987 MEMORANDUM TO: Michelle Stewart Yorkville Christian High School FROM: Michael K. Scavo Consultant Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal DATE: August 28, 2013 SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Study Proposed High School Yorkville, Illinois This memorandum summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the proposed Yorkville Christian High School to be located in Yorkville, Illinois. The site is located within the Prestwick subdivision which occupies the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The proposed school will have a maximum enrollment of 850 students and will utilize the two access roads that will serve the subdivision. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site area. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the development. The sections of this report present the following. Existing roadway conditions A description of the proposed single family development Directional distribution of the development generated traffic Vehicle trip generation for the proposed single family development Future traffic conditions including access to the site Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access roads, adjacent roadway network, and internal roadway network 2 Site Location Figure 1 SITE 3 Aerial View of Site Location Figure 2 4 Existing Conditions Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were documented based on a field visit conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location The proposed site is located within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision which is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The subdivision, of which Phase 1 is partially occupied, was approved for a total of 356 single-family homes. The proposed school will replace 84 approved single-family lots. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the site are described below. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is an east-west arterial road that provides a two-lane rural cross- section within the vicinity of the site. No parking is allowed on either side of the road. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under the jurisdiction of Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Within the vicinity of the site, the roadway has a posted speed limit of 50 mph and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 6,650 vehicles. Ashley Road is a north-south two-lane road that terminates at its stop sign controlled intersection with Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). The roadway is under the jurisdiction of Kendall Township with portions adjacent to Prestwick of Yorkville under the jurisdiction of City of Yorkville. Ashley Road has a 55 mph speed limit and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) of 500 vehicles. Penman Road is a two-lane road that provides access to Prestwick subdivision. Its approach to Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under stop sign control. No turn lanes are provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period traffic counts at the following intersections. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road 5 The traffic counts were conducted on Tuesday, August 11, 2013 during the morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and evening (3:000 to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods. The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:30 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and the evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 4:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. Figure 3 illustrates the existing peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Development Plan As proposed, the plans call for a high school with a maximum enrollment of 850 students. Access to the proposed site will be provided mainly off Ashley Road with secondary access off Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Directional Distribution of Site Traffic The directional distribution of future site-generated trips on the roadway system is a function of several variables, including the operational characteristics of the roadway system and the ease with which drivers can travel over various sections of the roadway system without encountering congestion. The directions from which site-generated traffic will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 4 illustrates the directional distribution of traffic. Estimated Site Traffic Generation The volume of traffic generated by a development is based on the type of land use and the size of the development. The number of peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed high school was based on vehicle trip generation rates contained in the Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 1 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total 530 High School (850 Students) 230 135 365 80 165 245 1,450 P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 3 N N O T T O S C A L E S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) E x i s t i n g W e e k d a y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 8 (14) 9 (15) 1 ( 2 ) 1 ( 1 ) 1 ( 3 ) 18 3 ( 2 6 7 ) 17 4 ( 3 5 3 ) 1 ( 0 ) 1 6 6 ( 2 4 7 ) 9 ( 9 ) 1 5 6 ( 3 4 0 ) 6 ( 3 6 ) PEN M A N ROA D P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 4 N N O T T O S C A L E S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 E s t i m a t e d D i r e c t i o n a l D i s t r i b u t i o n 0 0 % - P E R C E N T D I S T R I B U T I O N 50 % 10% 4 0 % PEN M A N ROA D 8 As shown in Table 1, the development is estimated to generate approximately 365 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday morning peak hour, approximately 245 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday evening peak hour, and 1,450 total vehicle trips during the day. It should be noted that the estimated trips represent the peak hours of the school which in the morning it coincides with the roadway system peak hour while in the evening it occurs prior to the street system peak hour. However, for the purpose of this analysis, the evening trip generation was assumed to coincide with the roadway system’s peak hour. Furthermore, while the school is anticipated to generate some of its traffic from within Prestwick subdivision, it was assumed , in order to further present a conservative analysis, that all trips will be external. Trip Generation Comparison As indicated earlier, the proposed school site within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision will replace approximately 84 single-family home sites. Table 2 is proposed summarizing the amount of traffic the eliminated lots will generate utilizing ITE trip generation rates. Table 2 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total 210 84 Single-Family Homes 17 52 69 76 44 121 894 When compared to the amount of traffic the school will generate at full occupancy, it can be seen that the proposed school will result in an increase of approximately 296 trips during the morning peak hour, 124 trips during the evening peak hour and 556 daily trips. It is important to note that the school trips are conservative in that not all of the trips will be generated externally and that the estimated trips in the evening peak hour will occur before the roadway system peak hour. Projected Traffic Volumes The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system (Figure 5) in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. In addition to the traffic generated by the development, the study also included traffic that will be generated by the full buildout of the Prestwick subdivision as well as the increase in background traffic assumed at two percent per year applied over a seven year period. The existing traffic volumes were therefore increased by fourteen percent and combined with the peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed school and buildout of Prestwick subdivision to determine the projected traffic volumes which are shown in Figure 6. P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 5 N N O T T O S C A L E 25 (3 5 ) 1 4 ( 1 7 ) S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 42 (47) SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 8 0 ( 2 5 ) 35 ( 1 5 ) 42 ( 4 7 ) 80 ( 2 5 ) 9 2 ( 3 2 ) 54 (66) 172 (57) 9 6 ( 1 1 3 ) 23 (8) E s t i m a t e d S i t e - G e n e r a t e d T r a f f i c V o l u m e s PEN M A N ROA D P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 6 N N O T T O S C A L E 92 ( 7 0 ) 28 (15) 2 4 ( 2 2 ) S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 62 (71) SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) P r o j e c t e d T o t a l T r a f f i c V o l u m e s Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 28 (18) 19 (33) 1 4 6 ( 1 4 3 ) 17 (51) 187 (112) 1 8 8 ( 4 1 8 ) 1 0 9 ( 1 1 8 ) 2 1 7 ( 2 9 7 ) 9 5 ( 4 5 ) 103 (105) 24 0 ( 4 6 9 ) 10 ( 2 0 ) 28 4 ( 3 2 7 ) 55 ( 9 0 ) PEN M A N ROA D 11 Site Access Access to the school site will be provided via two access roads: a full ingress-egress access road on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via the existing Penman road and a full ingress/egress access road on Ashley Road via the proposed access road planned to serve Phase 2 of the Prestwick subdivision and the proposed school. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Penman Road A full ingress/egress access road is provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Outbound movements from this access road are under stop control. This approach will operate at acceptable levels of service in the morning and evening peak hours under proposed conditions. A westbound left-turn lane should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) meeting IDOT’s design criteria for 30 mph speed limit (220 feet of taper and 215 feet of storage). An eastbound right-turn lane will not be required or warranted. Two northbound lanes striped to indicate a separate left-turn lane and separate right-turn lane will also be provided via restriping of the existing pavement. Ashley Road and Proposed Access Road A full ingress/egress access road will be provided on Ashley Road approximately 1,800 feet south of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). Outbound movements from this access road will be under stop control. Widening of Ashley Road to provide turn lanes will not be necessary. Traffic Analysis Traffic analyses were performed for the intersections within the study area to determine the operation of the existing roadway system, evaluate the impact of the proposed single family home development, and determine the ability of the existing roadway system to accommodate projected traffic demands. Analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the existing traffic volumes and the projected traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using HCS 2010 computer software, which is based on the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2010. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter grade from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. Control delay is that portio n of the total delay attributed to the traffic signal or stop sign control operation and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Level of Service A is the highest grade (best traffic flow and least delay), Level of Service E represents saturated or at-capacity conditions, and Level of Service F is the lowest grade (oversaturated conditions, extensive delays). For two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersections, levels of service are only calculated for the approaches controlled by a stop sign (not for the intersection as a whole). The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for unsignalized intersections are shown in Table 2. The results of the capacity analysis 12 are summarized in Table 3 for the existing volumes and Table 4 for the projected volumes. Table 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA—UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Average Total Delay (SEC/VEH) A 0 - 10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 D > 25 - 35 E > 35 - 50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road B 10.0 B 12.2 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road B 10.7 B 12.3 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road B 11.8 B 13.9 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road B 12.9 C 15.1 Ashley Road with Proposed Access Road A 9.9 B 10.6 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. 13 Traffic Evaluation The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road currently operates at an acceptable level of service during morning and evening peak hours. With the additional traffic resulting from the development of the site and the ambient growth, the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. It is recommended that a westbound left-turn lane be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and that Ashley Road be widened to provide two northbound lanes striped to indicate an exclusive left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. The outbound movements from Ashley Road should continue to be under stop sign control. An eastbound right -turn lane will not be required or warranted. At the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road, the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service assuming the provision of a westbound left-turn lane. An eastbound right-turn lane will not be required nor warranted. At the intersection of Ashley Road with the proposed access road, acceptable levels of service are projected to occur with traffic exiting the development under stop sign control. No widening of Ashley Road will be necessary. Conclusion and Recommendations Based on the proposed development plans and the preceding traffic impact study, the following conclusions and recommendations are made. The addition of the new traffic generated by the proposed school will be accommodated by the roadway system. Westbound left-turn lanes should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) at its intersections with Ashley Road and Penman Road. The two site access roads will be adequate to serve the total traffic that will be generated by the proposed school and full occupancy of Prestwick subdivision. 13-138 Stewart Proposed Yorkville Christian High School August 28 2013 mks lra KLOA, Inc. Transportation and Parking Planning Consultants 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 | Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 | f: 847-518-9987 MEMORANDUM TO: Michelle Stewart Yorkville Christian High School FROM: Michael K. Scavo Consultant Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal DATE: September 18, 2013 SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Study Proposed Yorkville Christian High School Yorkville, Illinois This memorandum summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the proposed Yorkville Christian High School to be located in Yorkville, Illinois. The site is located within the Prestwick subdivision which occupies the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The proposed school will have a maximum enrollment of 850 students and will utilize the two access roads that will serve the subdivision. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site area. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the development. The sections of this report present the following. • Existing roadway conditions • A description of the proposed single family development • Directional distribution of the development generated traffic • Vehicle trip generation for the proposed single family development • Future traffic conditions including access to the site • Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours • Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access roads, adjacent roadway network, and internal roadway network 2 Site Location Figure 1 SITE 3 Aerial View of Site Location Figure 2 4 Existing Conditions Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were documented based on a field visit conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location The proposed site is located within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision which is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The subdivision, of which Phase 1 is partially occupied, was approved for a total of 356 single-family homes. The proposed school will replace 84 approved single-family lots. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the site are described below. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is an east-west arterial road that provides a two-lane rural cross- section within the vicinity of the site. No parking is allowed on either side of the road. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under the jurisdiction of Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Within the vicinity of the site, the roadway has a posted speed limit of 50 mph and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 6,650 vehicles. Ashley Road is a north-south two-lane road that terminates at its stop sign controlled intersection with Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). The roadway is under the jurisdiction of Kendall Township with portions adjacent to Prestwick of Yorkville under the jurisdiction of City of Yorkville. Ashley Road has a 55 mph speed limit and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) of 500 vehicles. Penman Road is a two-lane road that provides access to Prestwick subdivision. Its approach to Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under stop sign control. No turn lanes are provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period traffic counts at the following intersections. • Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road • Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road 5 The traffic counts were conducted on Tuesday, August 11, 2013 during the morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and evening (3:000 to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods. The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:30 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and the evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 4:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. Figure 3 illustrates the existing peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Development Plan As proposed, the plans call for a high school with a maximum enrollment of 850 students. Access to the proposed site will be provided mainly off Ashley Road with secondary access off Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Directional Distribution of Site Traffic The directional distribution of future site-generated trips on the roadway system is a function of several variables, including the operational characteristics of the roadway system and the ease with which drivers can travel over various sections of the roadway system without encountering congestion. The directions from which site-generated traffic will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 4 illustrates the directional distribution of traffic. Estimated Site Traffic Generation The volume of traffic generated by a development is based on the type of land use and the size of the development. The number of peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed high school was based on vehicle trip generation rates contained in the Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 1 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total 530 High School (850 Students) 230 135 365 80 165 245 1,450 P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 3 N N O T T O S C A L E S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) E x i s t i n g W e e k d a y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 8 (14) 9 (15) 1 ( 2 ) 1 ( 1 ) 1 ( 3 ) 18 3 ( 2 6 7 ) 17 4 ( 3 5 3 ) 1 ( 0 ) 1 6 6 ( 2 4 7 ) 9 ( 9 ) 1 5 6 ( 3 4 0 ) 6 ( 3 6 ) PEN M A N ROA D P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 4 N N O T T O S C A L E S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 E s t i m a t e d D i r e c t i o n a l D i s t r i b u t i o n 0 0 % - P E R C E N T D I S T R I B U T I O N 50 % 10% 4 0 % PEN M A N ROA D 8 As shown in Table 1, the development is estimated to generate approximately 365 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday morning peak hour, approximately 245 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday evening peak hour, and 1,450 total vehicle trips during the day. It should be noted that the estimated trips represent the peak hours of the school which in the morning it coincides with the roadway system peak hour while in the evening it occurs prior to the street system peak hour. However, for the purpose of this analysis, the evening trip generation was assumed to coincide with the roadway system’s peak hour. Furthermore, while the school is anticipated to generate some of its traffic from within Prestwick subdivision, it was assumed, in order to further present a conservative analysis, that all trips will be external. Trip Generation Comparison As indicated earlier, the proposed school site within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision will replace approximately 84 single-family home sites. Table 2 is proposed summarizing the amount of traffic the eliminated lots will generate utilizing ITE trip generation rates. Table 2 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total 210 84 Single-Family Homes 17 52 69 76 44 121 894 When compared to the amount of traffic the school will generate at full occupancy, it can be seen that the proposed school will result in an increase of approximately 296 trips during the morning peak hour, 124 trips during the evening peak hour and 556 daily trips. It is important to note that the school trips are conservative in that not all of the trips will be generated externally and that the estimated trips in the evening peak hour will occur before the roadway system peak hour. Projected Traffic Volumes The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system (Figure 5) in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. In addition to the traffic generated by the development, the study also included traffic that will be generated by the full buildout of the Prestwick subdivision as well as the increase in background traffic assumed at two percent per year applied as required by IDOT over an eleven year period (opening year plus ten) to represent Year 2024. The existing traffic volumes were therefore increased by twenty two percent and combined with the peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed school and buildout of Prestwick subdivision to determine the projected traffic volumes which are shown in Figure 6. P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 5 N N O T T O S C A L E 25 (3 5 ) 1 4 ( 1 7 ) S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 42 (47) SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 8 0 ( 2 5 ) 35 ( 1 5 ) 42 ( 4 7 ) 80 ( 2 5 ) 9 2 ( 3 2 ) 54 (66) 172 (57) 9 6 ( 1 1 3 ) 23 (8) E s t i m a t e d S i t e - G e n e r a t e d T r a f f i c V o l u m e s PEN M A N ROA D P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 6 N N O T T O S C A L E 92 (7 0 ) 28 (15) 2 4 ( 2 2 ) S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 62 (71) SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) P r o j e c t e d T o t a l T r a f f i c V o l u m e s Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 28 (18) 20 (34) 1 4 6 ( 1 4 3 ) 18 (52) 187 (112) 2 0 0 ( 4 4 5 ) 1 0 9 ( 1 1 8 ) 2 3 0 ( 3 1 7 ) 9 5 ( 4 5 ) 103 (105) 25 2 ( 4 9 6 ) 10 ( 2 0 ) 29 7 ( 3 4 7 ) 55 ( 9 0 ) PEN M A N ROA D 11 Site Access Access to the school site will be provided via two access roads: a full ingress-egress access road on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via the existing Penman road and a full ingress/egress access road on Ashley Road via the proposed access road planned to serve Phase 2 of the Prestwick subdivision and the proposed school. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Penman Road A full ingress/egress access road is provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Outbound movements from this access road are under stop control. This approach will operate at acceptable levels of service in the morning and evening peak hours under proposed conditions. A westbound left-turn lane should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) meeting IDOT’s design criteria for 30 mph speed limit (220 feet of taper and 215 feet of storage). An eastbound right-turn lane will be provided based on meeting warrants per Figure 36-3A of the BDE included in the Appendix. Two northbound lanes striped to indicate a separate left-turn lane and separate right-turn lane will also be provided via restriping of the existing pavement. Ashley Road and Proposed Access Road A full ingress/egress access road will be provided on Ashley Road approximately 1,800 feet south of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). Outbound movements from this access road will be under stop control. Widening of Ashley Road to provide a southbound right-turn lane will be warranted. Traffic Analysis Traffic analyses were performed for the intersections within the study area to determine the operation of the existing roadway system, evaluate the impact of the proposed single family home development, and determine the ability of the existing roadway system to accommodate projected traffic demands. Analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the existing traffic volumes and the projected traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using HCS 2010 computer software, which is based on the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2010. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter grade from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. Control delay is that portion of the total delay attributed to the traffic signal or stop sign control operation and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Level of Service A is the highest grade (best traffic flow and least delay), Level of Service E represents saturated or at-capacity conditions, and Level of Service F is the lowest grade (oversaturated conditions, extensive delays). For two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersections, levels of service are only calculated for the approaches controlled by a stop sign. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for unsignalized intersections are shown in Table 2. The results of the capacity analysis are summarized in Table 3 for the existing volumes and Table 4 for the projected volumes. 12 Table 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA—UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Average Total Delay (SEC/VEH) A 0 - 10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 D > 25 - 35 E > 35 - 50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road B 10.0 B 12.2 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road B 10.7 B 12.3 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road B 11.9 B 14.3 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road B 12.8 C 15.1 Ashley Road with Proposed Access Road B 10.7 B 10.6 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. 13 Traffic Evaluation The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road currently operates at an acceptable level of service during morning and evening peak hours. With the additional traffic resulting from the development of the site and the ambient growth, the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. It is recommended that a westbound left-turn lane be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and that Ashley Road be widened to provide two northbound lanes striped to indicate an exclusive left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. The outbound movements from Ashley Road should continue to be under stop sign control. An eastbound right-turn lane will not be required or warranted. At the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road, the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service assuming the provision of a westbound left-turn lane and an eastbound right-turn lane. At the intersection of Ashley Road with the proposed access road, acceptable levels of service are projected to occur with traffic exiting the development under stop sign control. No widening of Ashley Road will be necessary. Conclusion and Recommendations Based on the proposed development plans and the preceding traffic impact study, the following conclusions and recommendations are made. • The addition of the new traffic generated by the proposed school will be accommodated by the roadway system. • Westbound left-turn lanes should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) at its intersections with Ashley Road and Penman Road. • An eastbound right-turn lane should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) at its intersection with Penman Road. • A southbound right-turn lane should be provided on Ashley Road at its intersection with the proposed access road. • The two site access roads will be adequate to serve the total traffic that will be generated by the proposed school and full occupancy of Prestwick subdivision. 13-138 Stewart Proposed Yorkville Christian High School September 18 2013 mks lra Appendix tsuguA SNOITCESRETNI sionillI 2012 36-3.2 HARD COPIES UNCONTROLLED Note: For highways with a design speed below 50 mph (80 km/h), with a DHV in one direction of less than 300, and where right turns are greater than 40, an adjustment should be used. To read the vertical axis of the chart, subtract 20 from the actual number of right turns. Example Given: Design Speed = 35 mph (60 km/h) DHV (in one direction) = 250 vph Right Turns = 100 vph Problem: Determine if a right-turn lane is warranted. Solution: To read the vertical axis, use 100 - 20 = 80 vph. The figure indicates that right- turn lane is not necessary, unless other factors (e.g., high crash rate) indicate a lane is needed. GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT-TURN LANES AT UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS Figure 36-3.A PM AM55 90 352 437 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Penman Road KLOA, Inc. Transportation and Parking Planning Consultants 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 | Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 | f: MEMORANDUM TO: Michelle Stewart Yorkville Christian High School FROM: Michael K. Scavo Consultant Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal DATE: September 25, 2013 SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Study Proposed Yorkville Christian High School Yorkville, Illinois This memorandum summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the proposed Yorkville Christian High School to be located in Yorkville, Illinois. The site is located within the Prestwick subdivision which occupies the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The proposed school will have a maximum enrollment of 850 students and will utilize the two access roads that will serve the subdivision. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site area. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the development. The sections of this report present the following. • Existing roadway conditions • A description of the proposed single family development • Directional distribution of the development generated traffic • Vehicle trip generation for the proposed single family development • Future traffic conditions including access to the site • Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours • Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access roads, adjacent roadway network, and internal roadway network 2 Site Location Figure 1 SITE 3 Aerial View of Site Location Figure 2 4 Existing Conditions Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were documented based on a field visit conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location The proposed site is located within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision which is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The subdivision, of which Phase 1 is partially occupied, was approved for a total of 356 single-family homes. The proposed school will replace 84 approved single-family lots. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the site are described below. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is an east-west arterial road that provides a two-lane rural cross- section within the vicinity of the site. No parking is allowed on either side of the road. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under the jurisdiction of Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Within the vicinity of the site, the roadway has a posted speed limit of 50 mph and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 6,650 vehicles. Ashley Road is a north-south two-lane road that terminates at its stop sign controlled intersection with Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). The roadway is under the jurisdiction of Kendall Township with portions adjacent to Prestwick of Yorkville under the jurisdiction of City of Yorkville. Ashley Road has a 55 mph speed limit and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) of 500 vehicles. Penman Road is a two-lane road that provides access to Prestwick subdivision. Its approach to Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under stop sign control. No turn lanes are provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period traffic counts at the following intersections. • Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road • Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road 5 The traffic counts were conducted on Tuesday, August 11, 2013 during the morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and evening (3:000 to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods. The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:30 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and the evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 4:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. Figure 3 illustrates the existing peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Development Plan As proposed, the plans call for a high school with a maximum enrollment of 850 students. Access to the proposed site will be provided mainly off Ashley Road with secondary access off Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Directional Distribution of Site Traffic The directional distribution of future site-generated trips on the roadway system is a function of several variables, including the operational characteristics of the roadway system and the ease with which drivers can travel over various sections of the roadway system without encountering congestion. The directions from which site-generated traffic will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 4 illustrates the directional distribution of traffic. Estimated Site Traffic Generation The volume of traffic generated by a development is based on the type of land use and the size of the development. The number of peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed high school was based on vehicle trip generation rates contained in the Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 1 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total 530 High School (850 Students) 230 135 365 80 165 245 1,450 P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 3 N N O T T O S C A L E S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) E x i s t i n g W e e k d a y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 8 (14) 9 (15) 1 ( 2 ) 1 ( 1 ) 1 ( 3 ) 18 3 ( 2 6 7 ) 17 4 ( 3 5 3 ) 1 ( 0 ) 1 6 6 ( 2 4 7 ) 9 ( 9 ) 1 5 6 ( 3 4 0 ) 6 ( 3 6 ) PEN M A N ROA D 6 P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 4 N N O T T O S C A L E S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 E s t i m a t e d D i r e c t i o n a l D i s t r i b u t i o n 0 0 % - P E R C E N T D I S T R I B U T I O N 50 % 10% 4 0 % PEN M A N ROA D 7 8 As shown in Table 1, the development is estimated to generate approximately 365 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday morning peak hour, approximately 245 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday evening peak hour, and 1,450 total vehicle trips during the day. It should be noted that the estimated trips represent the peak hours of the school which in the morning it coincides with the roadway system peak hour while in the evening it occurs prior to the street system peak hour. However, for the purpose of this analysis, the evening trip generation was assumed to coincide with the roadway system’s peak hour. Furthermore, while the school is anticipated to generate some of its traffic from within Prestwick subdivision, it was assumed, in order to further present a conservative analysis, that all trips will be external. Trip Generation Comparison As indicated earlier, the proposed school site within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision will replace approximately 84 single-family home sites. Table 2 is proposed summarizing the amount of traffic the eliminated lots will generate utilizing ITE trip generation rates. Table 2 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total 210 84 Single-Family Homes 17 52 69 76 44 121 894 When compared to the amount of traffic the school will generate at full occupancy, it can be seen that the proposed school will result in an increase of approximately 296 trips during the morning peak hour, 124 trips during the evening peak hour and 556 daily trips. It is important to note that the school trips are conservative in that not all of the trips will be generated externally and that the estimated trips in the evening peak hour will occur before the roadway system peak hour. Projected Traffic Volumes The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system (Figure 5) in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. In addition to the traffic generated by the development, the study also included traffic that will be generated by the full buildout of the Prestwick subdivision as well as the increase in background traffic assumed at two percent per year applied as required by IDOT over an eleven year period (opening year plus ten) to represent Year 2024. The existing traffic volumes were therefore increased by twenty two percent and combined with the peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed school and buildout of Prestwick subdivision to determine the projected traffic volumes which are shown in Figure 6. P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 5 N N O T T O S C A L E 25 (3 5 ) 1 4 ( 1 7 ) S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 42 (47) SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 8 0 ( 2 5 ) 35 ( 1 5 ) 42 ( 4 7 ) 80 ( 2 5 ) 9 2 ( 3 2 ) 54 (66) 172 (57) 9 6 ( 1 1 3 ) 23 (8) E s t i m a t e d S i t e - G e n e r a t e d T r a f f i c V o l u m e s PEN M A N ROA D 9 P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 6 N N O T T O S C A L E 92 (7 0 ) 28 (15) 2 4 ( 2 2 ) S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 62 (71) SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) P r o j e c t e d T o t a l T r a f f i c V o l u m e s Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 28 (18) 20 (34) 1 4 6 ( 1 4 3 ) 18 (52) 187 (112) 2 0 0 ( 4 4 5 ) 1 0 9 ( 1 1 8 ) 2 3 0 ( 3 1 7 ) 9 5 ( 4 5 ) 103 (105) 25 2 ( 4 9 6 ) 10 ( 2 0 ) 29 7 ( 3 4 7 ) 55 ( 9 0 ) PEN M A N ROA D 10 11 Site Access Access to the school site will be provided via two access roads: a full ingress-egress access road on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via the existing Penman road and a full ingress/egress access road on Ashley Road via the proposed access road planned to serve Phase 2 of the Prestwick subdivision and the proposed school. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Penman Road A full ingress/egress access road is provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Outbound movements from this access road are under stop control. This approach will operate at acceptable levels of service in the morning and evening peak hours under proposed conditions. A westbound left-turn lane should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) meeting IDOT’s design criteria for 50 mph speed limit (220 feet of taper and 215 feet of storage). An eastbound right-turn lane will be provided based on meeting warrants per Figure 36-3A of the BDE included in the Appendix. Two northbound lanes striped to indicate a separate left-turn lane and separate right-turn lane will also be provided via restriping of the existing pavement. Ashley Road and Proposed Access Road A full ingress/egress access road will be provided on Ashley Road approximately 1,800 feet south of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). Outbound movements from this access road will be under stop control. Widening of Ashley Road to provide a southbound right-turn lane will be warranted. Traffic Analysis Traffic analyses were performed for the intersections within the study area to determine the operation of the existing roadway system, evaluate the impact of the proposed single family home development, and determine the ability of the existing roadway system to accommodate projected traffic demands. Analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the existing traffic volumes and the projected traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using HCS 2010 computer software, which is based on the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2010. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter grade from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. Control delay is that portion of the total delay attributed to the traffic signal or stop sign control operation and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Level of Service A is the highest grade (best traffic flow and least delay), Level of Service E represents saturated or at-capacity conditions, and Level of Service F is the lowest grade (oversaturated conditions, extensive delays). For two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersections, levels of service are only calculated for the approaches controlled by a stop sign. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for unsignalized intersections are shown in Table 2. The results of the capacity analysis are summarized in Table 3 for the existing volumes and Table 4 for the projected volumes. 12 Table 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA—UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Average Total Delay (SEC/VEH) A 0 - 10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 D > 25 - 35 E > 35 - 50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road B 10.0 B 12.2 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road B 10.7 B 12.3 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road B 11.6 B 14.0 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road B 12.2 B 14.7 Ashley Road with Proposed Access Road A 10.0 B 10.1 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. 13 Traffic Evaluation The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road currently operates at an acceptable level of service during morning and evening peak hours. With the additional traffic resulting from the development of the site and the ambient growth, the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. It is recommended that a westbound left-turn lane be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and that Ashley Road be widened to provide two northbound lanes striped to indicate an exclusive left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. The outbound movements from Ashley Road should continue to be under stop sign control. An eastbound right-turn lane will also be required based on meeting warrants per Figure 36-3A of the BDE as illustrated in the Appendix. At the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road, the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service assuming the provision of a westbound left-turn lane and an eastbound right-turn lane. At the intersection of Ashley Road with the proposed access road, acceptable levels of service are projected to occur with traffic exiting the development under stop sign control. Conclusion and Recommendations Based on the proposed development plans and the preceding traffic impact study, the following conclusions and recommendations are made. • The addition of the new traffic generated by the proposed school will be accommodated by the roadway system. • Westbound left-turn lanes should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) at its intersections with Ashley Road and Penman Road. • Eastbound right-turn lanes should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) at its intersections with Ashley Road and Penman Road. • Ashley Road should be widened at its intersection with Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) to provide two northbound lanes striped for an exclusive left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. • Penman Road at its intersection with Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) should be striped to show two northbound lanes designated as an exclusive left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. • A southbound right-turn lane should be provided on Ashley Road at its intersection with the proposed access road. • The two site access roads will be adequate to serve the total traffic that will be generated by the proposed school and full occupancy of Prestwick subdivision. 13-138 Stewart Proposed Yorkville Christian High School September 25 2013 mks lra Appendix tsuguA SNOITCESRETNI sionillI 2012 36-3.2 HARD COPIES UNCONTROLLED Note: For highways with a design speed below 50 mph (80 km/h), with a DHV in one direction of less than 300, and where right turns are greater than 40, an adjustment should be used. To read the vertical axis of the chart, subtract 20 from the actual number of right turns. Example Given: Design Speed = 35 mph (60 km/h) DHV (in one direction) = 250 vph Right Turns = 100 vph Problem: Determine if a right-turn lane is warranted. Solution: To read the vertical axis, use 100 - 20 = 80 vph. The figure indicates that right- turn lane is not necessary, unless other factors (e.g., high crash rate) indicate a lane is needed. GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT-TURN LANES AT UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS Figure 36-3.A PM AM55 90 352 437 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Penman Road tsuguA SNOITCESRETNI sionillI 2012 36-3.2 HARD COPIES UNCONTROLLED Note: For highways with a design speed below 50 mph (80 km/h), with a DHV in one direction of less than 300, and where right turns are greater than 40, an adjustment should be used. To read the vertical axis of the chart, subtract 20 from the actual number of right turns. Example Given: Design Speed = 35 mph (60 km/h) DHV (in one direction) = 250 vph Right Turns = 100 vph Problem: Determine if a right-turn lane is warranted. Solution: To read the vertical axis, use 100 - 20 = 80 vph. The figure indicates that right- turn lane is not necessary, unless other factors (e.g., high crash rate) indicate a lane is needed. GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT-TURN LANES AT UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS Figure 36-3.A PM45 95 325 360 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road AM Storm Sewer Design Report Latest Revision: August 22, 2013 YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Prepared for: John & Michelle Stewart 3874 N. IL Route 71 Sheridan, IL 60551 Phone: 815-695-5667 HRG Job: 88130135 Prepared by: Kenneth Gomez, E.I. Staff Engineer David W. Schultz, P.E., LEED AP BD+C Project Manager INDEX DESIGN NOTES TAB 1  Project Location Map  Existing and Previous Conditions  Proposed Conditions DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS/EXHIBITS TAB 2  Rational Method “C” Calculation – Proposed  Proposed Rational C Calculation Map  Rainfall Intensity  Storm Sewer IDF Curves  Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc)  Inlet Capacities per IDOT Design Manual o R-2502-D o R-3015-R o R-3286-8V o R-4340-B  Overall Storm Sewer Pipe Layout Plan View  Hydraflow Storm Sewer Output – 10 YR  Storm Sewer Tabulation EXHIBITS TAB 3  Previous Conditions - Phase 2 Drainage Exhibit  Proposed Drainage Exhibit  Copies from Smith Engineering Consultants Drainage Report & Storm Sizing – Prestwick of Yorkville Phase 2 (Reference)  Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report (Reference) TAB 1 DESIGN NOTES Project location DESIGN NOTES EXISTING AND PREVIOUS CONDITIONS:  Property location is the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois.  The subject property consists of approximately a total of +/- 193.8 acres of which 31.6 acres (Lots formerly known as #273 – #356) is being disturbed for the proposed location of a private school. The project site is located south of Phase 1 on what was previously known as the Prestwick of Yorkville Phase 2 subdivision which is generally located south of IL Route 126 and west of Ashley Road in the United City of Yorkville. The overall land area remains the same with a change in land us from residential to a school lot covering 84 lots, and former Right-of-Way including sidewalk and roadway.  Storm water management and runoff for Lots 273 through 356 along with former Right-of-Way have been previously accounted for in the original development of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision; please refer to the drainage report prepared by Smith Engineering Consultants, dated April 16, 2007 that was previously approved, reference sheets from that report are contained within this report as reference. The proposed tributary area for the proposed area is being tied directly into the existing storm sewer that was previously approved and extended from the storm water management basins, “Basin 2” and “Basin 3B” of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision.  The storm sewer system downstream of Lot 273 through Lot 356 was previously designed by Smith Engineering Consultants to accept the flow from the developed site. As seen on Worksheet 2 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report, Basins 2 and 3B were designed and sized for approximately +/- 65 acres with curve numbers 74 and 73 respectively which is consistent with the areas summarized in the Rational Method “C” Calculation that broke down the two different land uses and compared the impervious areas in the ultimate design. The proposed school site will be phased over time and the entire lot is to be consistent with what was previously accounted for and should be allowed up to approximately +/- 13.3 acres (579,000 sq.ft.) of impervious development on the school site, Lot 1.  At the date of this report, Phase I and portions of Phase 2 stormwater management facilities for the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision have been fully constructed. Currently, there is a 10” drain tile at the downstream end of the Basin 3B restrictor structure (Tag CC) that drains to the west ditch of Ashley Road. This discharge eventually reaches an existing 24” CMP that passes flow to the east side of Ashley Road. The current land owner has since reconnected the existing 10” drain tile to the downstream field tile that had serviced the property historically so the low flow discharges are subsurface in the field tile system and overland flows still remain unchanged and tributary to the existing 24” CMP under Ashley Road. Proposed Conditions:  The proposed storm sewer for Lot 1 (Yorkville Christian School) has been designed on the basis of the ten (10) year storm and rainfall data found within the City of Yorkville watershed and Bulletin 70 data.  The onsite storm sewer has been designed utilizing the Hydraflow Storm Sewer for AutoCad 3D, 2011 which is based on the Rational Method.  Time of concentration was calculated for each of the proposed drainage areas. Time of concentration was assumed to be five (5) minutes for all smaller subareas with a time of concentrations less than 5 minutes which included any areas with buildings.  The proposed Rational C runoff coefficient for the school lot was summarized and compared to the previously designed land use area that contained single- family units and roadway section from the Prestwick of Yorkville Supplemental Report by Smith Engineering Consultants. Although using different methods, these numbers were converted to compare proposed C value of 0.69 to the existing curve number of 74.  Existing Sub-Basins H, L, and Q of Basins 2 and 3B for Prestwick of Yorkville Phase 2 will be used in the proposed stormwater management as the system was previously designed to accept the flow from their respective Sub-Basins in the Prestwick of Yorkville Drainage Report.  Due to the shift in the main access drive off of Ashley Road into the subdivision, the proposed location for stormwater Basin 3C will now be moved south on the opposite side of the main access drive and included in the future improvements because of poor existing soil conditions of where the previous roadway was aligned. Also at the current time the storm sewer has not been extended to Basin 3C as it currently stops at the restrictor manhole CC shown on page 75 of the phase 2 plans. Also while this area is to remain un-platted and as pre- existing conditions the storm sewer is to be extended and installed once future phase 2 plans are re-submitted for permit.  Proposed storm sewer structures are tributary to an existing storm sewer line that will connect to an existing downstream detention basin “Basin 3B” of the existing Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision.  DA-1 and DA-23 parking lot drain directly via curb cuts to the storm water management (SWM) Basin 2. DA-24 drains temporarily via a graded swale directly to SWM Basin 2, and in future development will drain via a proposed storm sewer system.  SWM Basin Q was previously designed in the Prestwick Subdivision to receive the flow from Sub-basins Q1 and Q2. Flows of Sub-Basins H41B, H29A, H41, and H42 (pipe tag numbers 261, 259, 249, 247) in the previously designed Prestwick Subdivision were used for the proposed system in order to determine the downstream flow of Sub-Basin H42 (pipes 243 and 245) going to Basin 3B. Existing flows of Sub-Basins H7 and H11 (pipes 213 and 333B) were used to account for the flow from offsite and going to Sub-Basin H15 (pipe 217) that flows onsite onto DA-14. TAB 2 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Project #:88130135 Project:Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 7/11/2013 Location:Yorkville, Illinois Checked DWS Date 7/11/2013 BASIN AREA AREA AREA %PAVED %GRASSRUNOFF AREA NO.(SQ-FT)PAVEDGRASS0.95 0.5 "C"(acres) PROPOSED YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SITE - OVERALL PHASE 1 278,289.2209,851.268,438.075%25%0.84 6.39 PHASE 2 112,491.178,071.234,419.969%31%0.81 2.58 FUTURE 986,055.0286,448.2699,606.829%71%0.63 22.64 PR-DA-AVERAGE 1,376,835.3574,370.5802,464.742%58%0.69 31.61 EXISTING SUBDIVISION - PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT-2 (PHASE 2) PHASE 2 PRESTWICK 1,376,835.3 797,643.0 84 LOTS (LOT #273 – LOT #356)448,674.2 ROADWAY 98,322.5 SIDEWALK 32,195.6 EX-DA-AVERAGE 1,376,835.3579,192.3797,643.042%58%0.69 31.61 PROPOSEDSQ.FT.AC. TOTAL AREA1,376,835.331.61 Pervious Area802,464.718.42 Impervious Area574,370.513.19 % Impervious41.7% EXISTINGSQ.FT.AC. TOTAL AREA1,376,835.331.61 Pervious Area797,643.018.31 Impervious Area579,192.313.30 % Impervious42.1% RATIONAL METHOD "C" CALCULATION Project #:88130135 Project:Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 7/11/2013 Location:Yorkville, Illinois Checked DWS Date 8/21/2013 BASINAREAAREAAREA%PAVED %GRASSRUNOFFAREA NO.(SQ-FT)PAVEDGRASS0.950.5"C"(acres) PROPOSED DA-196,190.358,337.437,852.961%39%0.772.21 DA-223,470.919,929.13,541.885%15%0.880.54 DA-330,653.820,439.1 10,214.7 67%33%0.800.70 DA-425,884.616,683.79,200.964%36%0.790.59 DA-514,556.713,313.11,243.691%9%0.910.33 DA-616,316.814,938.61,378.292%8%0.910.37 DA-79,268.18,904.9363.296%4%0.930.21 DA-828,450.226,531.11,919.093%7%0.920.65 DA-914,557.814,229.2328.598%2%0.940.33 DA-1020,008.213,834.76,173.569%31%0.810.46 DA-11 15,823.7 9,712.76,111.061%39%0.780.36 DA-1210,222.36,348.43,873.962%38%0.780.23 DA-137,555.66,245.01,310.683%17%0.870.17 DA-1423,234.117,802.65,431.677%23%0.840.53 DA-1517,806.111,324.96,481.264%36%0.790.41 DA-166,636.33,021.43,614.946%54%0.700.15 DA-1717,593.43,763.713,829.721%79%0.600.40 DA-189,304.9680.68,624.37%93%0.530.21 DA-199,246.19,246.10.0100%0%0.950.21 DA-209,437.39,437.30.0100%0%0.950.22 DA-212,770.12,770.10.0100%0%0.950.06 DA-223,513.73,513.70.0100%0%0.950.08 DA-2346,838.540,013.86,824.785%15%0.881.08 DA-24504,718.7105,284.5399,434.221%79%0.5911.59 DA-25372,127.8112,076.5260,051.230%70%0.648.54 DA-2640,649.325,988.214,661.164%36%0.790.93 DA-AVERAGE1,376,835574,370802,46542%58%0.6931.61 PROPOSEDSQ.FT.AC. TOTAL AREA1,376,835.331.61 Pervious Area802,464.918.42 Impervious Area574,370.413.19 % Impervious 41.7% RATIONAL METHOD "C" CALCULATION 80 40 2 0 0 Bulletin 70 - Figure 14 Derived Rainfall Intensities (Yorkville) Duration 10 yr 25 yr 50 yr 100 yr (min)RainfallAvg. IRainfallAvg. IRainfallAvg. IRainfallAvg. I 5 0.586.910.708.350.829.790.9811.81 6 0.666.620.808.000.949.381.1311.32 7 0.756.420.907.761.069.091.2810.96 8 0.846.261.017.571.188.871.4310.70 9 0.926.141.117.421.318.701.5710.50 10 1.016.051.227.31 1.438.571.7210.33 11 1.075.811.297.02 1.518.231.829.93 12 1.125.621.366.79 1.597.961.929.59 13 1.185.451.436.59 1.677.722.029.31 14 1.245.311.506.41 1.757.522.129.07 15 1.305.181.576.26 1.847.342.218.86 16 1.334.981.606.02 1.887.062.278.51 17 1.364.801.645.80 1.936.802.328.20 18 1.394.641.685.61 1.976.572.387.93 19 1.424.501.725.43 2.026.372.437.68 20 1.464.371.765.28 2.066.192.497.46 21 1.494.251.805.14 2.116.022.547.26 22 1.524.151.845.01 2.155.872.607.08 23 1.554.051.884.89 2.205.742.656.92 24 1.583.961.914.79 2.245.612.716.77 25 1.623.881.954.69 2.295.492.766.63 26 1.653.801.994.60 2.335.392.826.50 27 1.683.732.034.51 2.385.292.876.38 28 1.713.672.074.43 2.435.202.926.27 29 1.743.612.114.36 2.475.112.986.16 30 1.783.552.154.29 2.525.033.036.07 31 1.803.472.174.20 2.544.923.075.94 32 1.813.402.194.11 2.574.823.105.81 33 1.833.332.224.03 2.604.723.135.70 34 1.853.272.243.95 2.624.633.175.59 35 1.873.212.263.88 2.654.553.205.48 36 1.893.152.293.81 2.684.473.235.38 37 1.913.102.313.74 2.714.393.265.29 38 1.933.052.333.68 2.734.323.305.20 39 1.953.002.353.62 2.764.253.335.12 40 1.972.952.383.57 2.794.183.365.04 41 1.992.912.403.51 2.824.123.394.97 42 2.012.872.423.46 2.844.063.434.90 43 2.032.832.453.42 2.874.003.464.83 44 2.042.792.473.37 2.903.953.494.76 45 2.062.752.493.33 2.923.903.534.70 50 2.162.592.613.13 3.063.673.694.43 60 2.262.262.732.73 3.203.203.853.85 (hours) 1 2.262.262.732.733.203.203.853.85 2 2.781.393.361.683.941.974.762.38 3 3.071.023.711.244.351.455.251.75 6 3.600.604.350.735.100.856.151.03 12 4.180.355.050.42 5.920.497.130.59 18 4.510.255.450.30 6.390.367.710.43 24 4.80.205.80.246.80.288.20.34 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 05101520253035404550 In t e n s i t y ( i n / h r ) Duration (minutes) Bulletin 70, Figure 14 -YORKVILLE Intensity vs. Duration Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.016 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.27=0.2716.38971 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft106 316 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.015 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s2.490.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.00=0.01 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.28 17.09931 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 1 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.054 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.17=0.1710.07539 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 185 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.017 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s0.002.10 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.02=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.19 11.54107 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 2 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.096 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.13=0.138.004068 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft151 68 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.02860.055 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.443.78 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.15 9.03564 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 3 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.33=0.3319.77968 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft281 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.0345 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.780.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.35 21.02004 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 4 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft1000 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0110.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.03+0.00=0.031.578954 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft95 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.004 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s1.290.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.05 2.81048 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. 8/21/2013 Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School DA 5 KLG DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft1000 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0370.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.02+0.00=0.020.971955 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft130 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.037 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.910.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.00=0.01 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.03 1.52606 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 6 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft290 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0150.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.01+0.00=0.010.518094 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft95 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.015 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s2.490.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.00=0.01 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.02 1.154051 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 7 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft00 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.00=0.000 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft284 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.034 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.750.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.02 1.262783 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 8 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft1000 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0110.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.03+0.00=0.031.578954 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft18 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.0033 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s1.170.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.03 1.835855 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 9 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.007 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.38=0.3822.81288 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft0 116 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0 0.007 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s0.001.35 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.02=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.40 24.24507 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 10 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft3268 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0350.035 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.01+0.15=0.159.201772 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft295 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.03 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.520.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.18 10.59818 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 11 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft012 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.06=0.063.62714 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft164 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.006 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s1.570.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.03+0.00=0.03 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.09 5.363013 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 12 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft08 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.015 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.04=0.042.229743 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft165 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.015 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s2.490.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.06 3.3343 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 13 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft00 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.00=0.000 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft364 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.026 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.280.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.03+0.00=0.03 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.03 1.850821 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 14 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft00 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.00=0.000 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft286 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.033 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.690.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.02 1.2908 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 15 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft2179 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0520.052 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.14=0.158.714095 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft41 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.067 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s5.260.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.15 8.843961 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 16 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.036 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.20=0.2011.84945 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft85 119 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.0360.036 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.863.06 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.01=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.21 12.86462 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 17 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.064 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.16=0.169.413417 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft0 35 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0 0.027 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s0.002.65 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.16 9.633446 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 18 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.087 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.14=0.148.325524 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft373 13 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.0150.087 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s2.494.76 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.04+0.00=0.04 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.18 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 23 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.0039 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.48=0.4828.8266 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft0 1242 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0 0.0039 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s0.001.01 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.34=0.34 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.82 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 24 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.011 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.32=0.3219.03979 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft61 568 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.00740.031 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s1.752.84 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.06=0.07 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.38 22.95361 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 25 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.029 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.22=0.2212.91993 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft9 140 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.0180.018 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s2.732.16 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.02=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.23 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 26 DWS Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-2502 TY D Grate 0.9 = Free open area of grate (sq. ft.) 6 = Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) ---- Capacity Calculation ----- WeirOrificeNetWeir/OrificeFlow Type PondingEquationEquationCapacityratio 0.050.200.970.200.21Weir Flow 0.100.571.370.570.42Weir Flow 0.151.051.681.050.62Weir Flow 0.171.261.791.220.71Transition Flow 0.201.611.941.420.83Transition Flow 0.252.252.171.771.04Transition Flow 0.302.962.372.131.25Transition Flow 0.353.732.562.521.45Transition Flow 0.404.552.742.741.66Orifice Flow 0.455.432.912.911.87Orifice Flow 0.506.363.063.062.08Orifice Flow 0.557.343.213.212.28Orifice Flow 0.608.373.363.362.49Orifice Flow 0.659.433.493.492.70Orifice Flow 0.7010.543.633.632.91Orifice Flow 0.7511.693.753.753.12Orifice Flow 1.0018.004.334.334.15Orifice Flow 1.2525.164.844.845.19Orifice Flow 1.5033.075.315.316.23Orifice Flow 1.7541.675.735.737.27Orifice Flow 2.0050.916.136.138.31Orifice Flow 2.2560.756.506.509.35Orifice Flow 2.5071.156.856.8510.38Orifice Flow 2.7582.097.197.1911.42Orifice Flow 3.0093.537.517.5112.46Orifice Flow 3.25105.467.817.8113.50Orifice Flow 3.50117.868.118.1114.54Orifice Flow 3.75130.718.398.3915.58Orifice Flow 4.00144.008.678.6716.61Orifice Flow 4.25157.718.938.9317.65Orifice Flow 4.50171.839.199.1918.69Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5Weir equation where: A= free open area of grate P= weir perimeter h= feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80% of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-3015-R (City of Yorkville) 1.1 = Free open area of grate (sq. ft.) 4.6 = Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) ---- Capacity Calculation ----- WeirOrificeNetWeir/OrificeFlow Type PondingEquationEquationCapacityratio 0.050.151.180.150.13Weir Flow 0.100.441.670.440.26Weir Flow 0.150.802.050.800.39Weir Flow 0.170.972.180.970.44Weir Flow 0.201.232.371.230.52Weir Flow 0.251.732.651.730.65Weir Flow 0.302.272.902.070.78Transition Flow 0.352.863.132.400.91Transition Flow 0.403.493.352.741.04Transition Flow 0.454.173.553.091.17Transition Flow 0.504.883.753.451.30Transition Flow 0.555.633.933.821.43Transition Flow 0.606.414.104.101.56Orifice Flow 0.657.234.274.271.69Orifice Flow 0.708.084.434.431.82Orifice Flow 0.75 8.96 4.59 4.59 1.95 Orifice Flow 0.8510.814.884.882.21Orifice Flow 1.0013.805.305.302.61Orifice Flow 1.2519.295.925.923.26Orifice Flow 1.5025.356.496.493.91Orifice Flow 1.7531.957.017.014.56Orifice Flow 2.0039.037.497.495.21Orifice Flow 2.2546.587.947.945.86Orifice Flow 2.5054.558.378.376.51Orifice Flow 2.7562.938.788.787.17Orifice Flow 3.0071.719.179.177.82Orifice Flow 3.2580.859.559.558.47Orifice Flow 3.5090.369.919.919.12Orifice Flow 3.75100.2110.2610.269.77Orifice Flow 4.00110.4010.5910.5910.42Orifice Flow 4.25120.9110.9210.9211.07Orifice Flow 4.50131.7311.2411.2411.72Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A= free open area of grate P= weir perimeter h= feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80% of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-3286-8V (City of Yorkville) 0.7 = Free open area of grate (sq. ft.) 4.4 = Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) ---- Capacity Calculation ----- WeirOrificeNetWeir/OrificeFlow Type PondingEquationEquationCapacityratio 0.050.150.750.150.20Weir Flow 0.100.421.070.420.39Weir Flow 0.150.771.310.770.59Weir Flow 0.170.931.390.930.67Weir Flow 0.201.181.511.080.78Transition Flow 0.251.651.691.330.98Transition Flow 0.302.171.851.611.17Transition Flow 0.352.731.991.891.37Transition Flow 0.403.342.132.131.57Orifice Flow 0.453.982.262.261.76Orifice Flow 0.504.672.382.381.96Orifice Flow 0.555.382.502.502.15Orifice Flow 0.606.132.612.612.35Orifice Flow 0.656.922.722.722.55Orifice Flow 0.707.732.822.822.74Orifice Flow 0.75 8.57 2.92 2.92 2.94 Orifice Flow 0.8510.343.113.113.33Orifice Flow 1.0013.203.373.373.92Orifice Flow 1.2518.453.773.774.90Orifice Flow 1.5024.254.134.135.87Orifice Flow 1.7530.564.464.466.85Orifice Flow 2.0037.344.774.777.83Orifice Flow 2.2544.555.065.068.81Orifice Flow 2.5052.185.335.339.79Orifice Flow 2.7560.205.595.5910.77Orifice Flow 3.0068.595.845.8411.75Orifice Flow 3.2577.346.086.0812.73Orifice Flow 3.5086.436.316.3113.71Orifice Flow 3.7595.866.536.5314.69Orifice Flow 4.00105.606.746.7415.67Orifice Flow 4.25115.656.956.9516.64Orifice Flow 4.50126.017.157.1517.62Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A= free open area of grate P= weir perimeter h= feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80% of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-4340-B 1.1 = Free open area of grate (sq. ft.) 6 = Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) ---- Capacity Calculation ----- WeirOrificeNetWeir/OrificeFlow Type PondingEquationEquationCapacityratio 0.050.201.180.200.17Weir Flow 0.100.571.670.570.34Weir Flow 0.151.052.051.050.51Weir Flow 0.171.262.181.260.58Weir Flow 0.201.612.371.590.68Transition Flow 0.252.252.651.960.85Transition Flow 0.302.962.902.341.02Transition Flow 0.353.733.132.741.19Transition Flow 0.404.553.353.161.36Transition Flow 0.455.433.553.551.53Orifice Flow 0.506.363.753.751.70Orifice Flow 0.557.343.933.931.87Orifice Flow 0.608.374.104.102.04Orifice Flow 0.659.434.274.272.21Orifice Flow 0.7010.544.434.432.38Orifice Flow 0.7511.694.594.592.55Orifice Flow 1.0018.005.305.303.40Orifice Flow 1.2525.165.925.924.25Orifice Flow 1.5033.076.496.495.10Orifice Flow 1.7541.677.017.015.95Orifice Flow 2.0050.917.497.496.80Orifice Flow 2.2560.757.947.947.65Orifice Flow 2.5071.158.378.378.50Orifice Flow 2.7582.098.788.789.35Orifice Flow 3.0093.539.179.1710.20Orifice Flow 3.25105.469.559.5511.05Orifice Flow 3.50117.869.919.9111.89Orifice Flow 3.75130.7110.2610.2612.74Orifice Flow 4.00144.0010.5910.5913.59Orifice Flow 4.25157.7110.9210.9214.44Orifice Flow 4.50171.8311.2411.2415.29Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A= free open area of grate P= weir perimeter h= feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80% of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. TAB 3 EXHIBITS EX - D A 40 20 1 0 0 ST O R M S E W E R C O M P U T A T I O N S H E E T BA S I N H PR E S T W I C K O F Y O R K V I L L E - P h a s e 2 CO M P U T E D B Y : G E K D A T E : 5 / 2 5 / 2 0 0 6 JO B N O : YK F D - 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - 0 3 C H E C K E D B Y : D W S U P D A T E D : 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 7 D R A I N A G E A R E A RU N O F F FL O W T I M E RA I N F A L L T O T A L I N L E T B Y P A S S P I P E C A P A C I T Y V E L O C I T Y (FT/SEC)INVERT ELEVATIONPIPE BA S I N PI P E L E N G T H ( A C R E S ) CO E F F . "A " x " C " (M I N U T E ) IN T E N S I T Y R U N O F F C A P A C I T Y F L O W D I A M E T E R F U L L FLOWINGDESIGNUPPERLOWERSLOPE TA G # ( F E E T ) IN C R E M E N T T O T A L "C " IN C R E M E N T T O T A L TO U P P E R E N D I N S E C T I O N (I N C H / H O U R ) ( C F S ) ( C F S ) (I N C H E S ) ( C F S ) FULLFLOWENDENDFT/FT H1 20 1 2 7 0 . 5 1 0. 5 1 0. 7 1 0. 3 6 0 . 3 6 1 0 . 9 0 0 . 1 7 5. 8 9 1. 0 5 1 . 0 5 1 . 0 9 12 2.172.762.73722.90722.800.0037201 H2 20 3 1 6 6 0 . 4 1 0. 9 2 0. 7 1 0. 2 9 0 . 6 6 1 1 . 0 7 0 . 9 5 5. 8 6 1. 8 9 0 . 9 7 0 . 8 7 12 2.052.612.90722.80722.250.0033203 H3 34 5 67 0 . 2 6 0. 2 6 0. 5 8 0. 1 5 0 . 1 5 9 . 4 0 0 . 2 9 6. 1 5 0. 9 3 12 3.774.803.83722.40721.650.0112345 H4 20 7 6 7 0 . 2 5 2. 4 3 0. 5 8 0. 1 5 1 . 5 3 1 1 . 8 9 0 . 1 7 5. 7 2 6. 7 9 15 7.285.936.54721.55720.700.0127207 H5 34 1 10 3 0 . 5 7 0. 5 7 0. 5 8 0. 3 3 0 . 3 3 1 4 . 0 0 0 . 5 0 5. 3 5 1. 7 7 12 2.493.183.44722.30721.800.0049341 H6 34 3 5 6 0 . 4 2 0. 9 9 0. 5 8 0. 2 4 0 . 5 7 1 4 . 5 0 0 . 2 5 5. 2 7 3. 0 2 15 4.313.513.80721.80721.550.0045343 H7 20 9 12 8 0 . 3 2 2. 7 5 0. 5 8 0. 1 8 1 . 7 1 1 4 . 7 4 0 . 4 2 5. 2 2 6. 9 9 18 7.764.395.05720.50719.800.0055209 21 1 74 2. 7 5 0. 0 0 1 . 7 1 1 5 . 1 7 0 . 2 5 5. 1 5 6. 8 7 18 7.724.375.01719.80719.400.0054211 21 3 13 8 2. 7 5 0. 0 0 1 . 7 1 1 5 . 4 1 0 . 4 8 5. 1 1 6. 8 0 18 7.484.234.81719.40718.700.0051213 H7 A 32 3 42 0 . 6 5 0. 6 5 0. 7 1 0. 4 6 0 . 4 6 1 2 . 4 0 0 . 1 5 5. 6 3 1. 1 6 1 . 1 6 1 . 4 5 12 4.605.864.71720.00719.300.0167323 H8 32 5 2 6 0 . 5 3 1. 1 8 0. 7 1 0. 3 7 0 . 8 4 1 2 . 5 5 0 . 0 6 5. 6 1 7. 0 2 15 8.016.547.47719.10718.700.0154325 H9 32 7 61 0 . 4 0 1. 5 8 0. 7 1 0. 2 8 1 . 1 2 1 2 . 6 1 0 . 1 8 5. 6 0 7. 3 8 18 8.534.835.51718.50718.100.0066327 H1 0 32 9 2 6 0 . 2 4 1. 8 3 0. 7 1 0. 1 7 1 . 3 0 1 2 . 7 9 0 . 0 6 5. 5 6 7. 2 1 18 11.266.386.74718.10717.800.0115329 H1 1 33 1 21 0 . 9 1 2. 7 4 0. 7 1 0. 6 5 1 . 9 4 1 2 . 8 6 0 . 0 5 5. 5 5 10 . 7 9 21 15.446.426.94717.60717.400.0095331 33 3 71 2. 7 4 0. 0 0 1 . 9 4 1 2 . 9 1 0 . 2 5 5. 5 4 10 . 7 8 21 11.094.614.81717.40717.050.0049333 33 3 B 62 2. 7 4 0. 0 0 1 . 9 4 1 3 . 1 5 0 . 1 8 5. 5 0 10 . 6 9 21 11.854.935.66717.05716.700.0056333B H1 2 34 7 7 5 0 . 3 4 0. 3 4 0. 5 8 0. 2 0 0 . 2 0 1 5 . 4 0 0 . 3 8 5. 1 2 1. 0 1 12 2.923.713.27720.50720.000.0067347 H1 3 34 9 60 0 . 3 2 0. 6 6 0. 5 8 0. 1 8 0 . 3 8 1 5 . 7 8 0 . 2 3 5. 0 5 1. 9 3 12 3.244.134.29720.00719.500.0083349 H1 4 21 5 5 8 0 . 2 5 2. 9 9 0. 5 8 0. 1 4 1 . 8 5 1 6 . 0 1 0 . 1 2 5. 0 2 7. 3 4 18 13.777.807.90718.70717.700.0172215 H1 5 21 7 75 0 . 2 8 6. 6 6 0. 5 8 0. 1 6 4. 3 4 1 6 . 1 4 0 . 3 1 5. 0 0 21 . 6 8 27 16.094.054.05716.70716.500.0027217 21 9 87 6. 6 6 0 . 0 0 4 . 3 4 1 6 . 4 5 0 . 1 9 4. 9 5 21 . 4 6 27 27.696.977.74716.50715.800.0080219 \\ h r g y v n a s \ D a t a \ 8 8 1 3 0 1 3 5 \ D e s i g n \ C a l c \ S t o r m \ 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - P H A S E 2 - S T O R M - R U N - B A S I N H . x l s Page 1 ST O R M S E W E R C O M P U T A T I O N S H E E T BA S I N H PR E S T W I C K O F Y O R K V I L L E - P h a s e 2 CO M P U T E D B Y : G E K D A T E : 5 / 2 5 / 2 0 0 6 JO B N O : YK F D - 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - 0 3 C H E C K E D B Y : D W S U P D A T E D : 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 7 D R A I N A G E A R E A RU N O F F FL O W T I M E RA I N F A L L T O T A L I N L E T B Y P A S S P I P E C A P A C I T Y V E L O C I T Y (FT/SEC)INVERT ELEVATIONPIPE BA S I N PI P E L E N G T H ( A C R E S ) CO E F F . "A " x " C " (M I N U T E ) IN T E N S I T Y R U N O F F C A P A C I T Y F L O W D I A M E T E R F U L L FLOWINGDESIGNUPPERLOWERSLOPE TA G # ( F E E T ) IN C R E M E N T T O T A L "C " IN C R E M E N T T O T A L TO U P P E R E N D I N S E C T I O N (I N C H / H O U R ) ( C F S ) ( C F S ) (I N C H E S ) ( C F S ) FULLFLOWENDENDFT/FT H1 6 31 7 2 6 0 . 9 1 0. 9 1 0. 7 1 0. 6 5 0 . 6 5 9 . 6 0 0 . 0 7 6. 1 2 3. 9 5 12 4.425.636.47718.20717.800.0154317 H1 7 31 9 18 0 . 6 1 1. 5 2 0. 7 1 0. 4 3 1 . 0 8 9 . 6 7 0 . 0 4 6. 1 1 6. 6 0 15 8.276.747.55717.60717.300.0164319 22 1 15 5 8. 1 8 0. 0 0 5 . 4 2 1 6 . 6 3 0 . 3 5 4. 9 2 26 . 6 4 27 27.786.997.42715.60714.350.0081221 H1 8 2 2 3 2 7 0 . 3 1 8. 4 9 0. 5 8 0. 1 8 5 . 6 0 1 6 . 9 8 0 . 0 6 4. 8 6 27 . 2 0 27 28.547.187.69714.35714.120.0085223 H1 9 31 3 45 0 . 2 8 0. 2 8 0. 5 8 0. 1 6 0 . 1 6 8 . 7 0 0 . 1 9 6. 2 7 1. 0 1 12 3.754.783.92715.00714.500.0111313 22 5 1 4 1 8. 7 7 0 . 0 0 5 . 7 6 1 7 . 0 4 0 . 3 0 4. 8 5 27 . 9 3 27 29.217.357.83712.00710.750.0089225 H2 0 2 2 7 1 5 0 0 . 8 2 9. 5 8 0. 5 8 0. 4 7 6 . 2 3 1 7 . 3 4 0 . 3 2 4. 8 0 29 . 9 2 27 30.417.667.84710.75709.300.0097227 H2 1 22 9 15 5 0 . 5 4 10 . 1 3 0. 5 8 0. 3 2 6 . 5 5 1 7 . 6 6 0 . 3 6 4. 7 5 31 . 1 0 30 32.936.717.28709.30708.300.0065229 H2 2 2 3 1 1 3 6 0 . 6 5 10 . 7 7 0. 5 8 0. 3 8 6 . 9 2 1 8 . 0 1 0 . 4 1 4. 6 9 32 . 4 8 30 27.205.555.55707.50706.900.0044231 H2 3 23 3 58 0 . 5 3 11 . 3 0 0. 5 8 0. 3 1 7 . 2 3 1 8 . 4 2 0 . 1 4 4. 6 3 33 . 4 3 30 34.066.947.14706.55706.150.0069233 H2 4 23 5 5 7 0 . 3 9 11 . 6 9 0. 5 8 0. 2 2 7 . 4 5 1 8 . 5 6 0 . 1 2 4. 6 0 34 . 3 1 30 36.247.397.98705.95705.500.0078235 H2 5 23 7 57 0 . 1 9 11 . 8 7 0. 5 8 0. 1 1 7 . 5 6 1 8 . 6 8 0 . 1 2 4. 5 8 34 . 6 6 30 36.217.387.86705.50705.060.0078237 H2 6 23 9 1 4 1 0 . 3 0 12 . 1 8 0. 5 8 0. 1 8 7 . 7 4 1 8 . 8 0 0 . 3 6 4. 5 6 35 . 3 2 36 39.675.626.44704.50704.000.0035239 24 1 1 3 2 12 . 1 8 0. 0 0 7 . 7 4 1 9 . 1 6 0 . 3 3 4. 5 1 34 . 8 6 36 41.105.826.60703.50703.000.0038241 H2 7 29 9 27 0 . 5 3 0. 5 3 0. 7 1 0. 3 8 0 . 3 8 1 1 . 8 0 0 . 1 0 5. 7 4 1. 0 9 1 . 0 9 1 . 0 8 12 4.335.524.43711.60711.200.0148299 H2 8 30 1 1 6 8 0 . 5 7 1. 1 0 0. 7 1 0. 4 0 0 . 7 8 1 1 . 9 0 0 . 4 3 5. 7 2 2. 1 8 1 . 1 3 1 . 2 0 12 5.637.186.54711.20707.000.0250301 H4 1 B 26 1 27 0 . 5 2 0. 5 2 0. 7 1 0. 3 7 0 . 3 7 1 0 . 2 0 0 . 1 0 6. 0 2 1. 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 . 1 2 12 4.335.524.45705.00704.600.0148261 H2 9 A 25 9 49 0 . 3 7 0. 8 9 0. 7 1 0. 2 6 0 . 6 3 1 2 . 5 0 0 . 1 9 5. 6 2 1. 8 6 0 . 8 9 0 . 5 7 12 3.234.114.24704.60704.200.0082259 H2 9 25 7 26 0 . 7 4 1. 6 3 0. 7 1 0. 5 3 1 . 5 6 1 2 . 6 9 0 . 0 6 5. 5 8 10 . 3 6 18 12.116.867.80703.80703.450.0133257 H3 0 25 5 2 3 0 . 7 1 2. 3 4 0. 7 1 0. 5 0 1 . 6 6 1 2 . 7 5 0 . 0 5 5. 5 7 13 . 2 2 18 13.577.697.98703.45703.060.0167255 H3 1 30 5 26 0 . 7 9 0. 7 9 0. 7 1 0. 5 6 0 . 5 6 1 1 . 1 0 0 . 0 7 5. 8 6 3. 2 8 12 4.425.636.18716.20715.800.0154305 H3 2 30 7 2 7 0 . 8 1 1. 6 0 0. 7 1 0. 5 8 1 . 1 4 1 1 . 1 7 0 . 0 6 5. 8 5 6. 6 4 15 7.866.417.26715.80715.400.0148307 30 9 1 5 0 1. 6 0 0. 0 0 1 . 1 4 1 1 . 2 3 0 . 3 7 5. 8 4 6. 6 3 15 7.285.936.73715.40713.500.0127309 \\ h r g y v n a s \ D a t a \ 8 8 1 3 0 1 3 5 \ D e s i g n \ C a l c \ S t o r m \ 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - P H A S E 2 - S T O R M - R U N - B A S I N H . x l s Page 2 ST O R M S E W E R C O M P U T A T I O N S H E E T BA S I N H PR E S T W I C K O F Y O R K V I L L E - P h a s e 2 CO M P U T E D B Y : G E K D A T E : 5 / 2 5 / 2 0 0 6 JO B N O : YK F D - 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - 0 3 C H E C K E D B Y : D W S U P D A T E D : 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 7 D R A I N A G E A R E A RU N O F F FL O W T I M E RA I N F A L L T O T A L I N L E T B Y P A S S P I P E C A P A C I T Y V E L O C I T Y (FT/SEC)INVERT ELEVATIONPIPE BA S I N PI P E L E N G T H ( A C R E S ) CO E F F . "A " x " C " (M I N U T E ) IN T E N S I T Y R U N O F F C A P A C I T Y F L O W D I A M E T E R F U L L FLOWINGDESIGNUPPERLOWERSLOPE TA G # ( F E E T ) IN C R E M E N T T O T A L "C " IN C R E M E N T T O T A L TO U P P E R E N D I N S E C T I O N (I N C H / H O U R ) ( C F S ) ( C F S ) (I N C H E S ) ( C F S ) FULLFLOWENDENDFT/FT 27 1 46 0 . 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6. 9 1 0. 0 0 12 5.256.690.00716.00715.000.0217271 H3 3 27 3 16 7 0 . 6 5 0. 6 6 0. 5 8 0. 3 8 0 . 3 8 7 . 4 0 0 . 6 2 6. 5 0 2. 4 7 12 3.154.014.46715.00713.700.0078273 H3 4 2 7 5 1 5 1 0 . 6 7 2. 9 2 0. 5 8 0. 3 9 1 . 9 0 1 1 . 6 0 0 . 3 2 5. 7 7 10 . 9 8 18 12.096.857.78713.30711.300.0133275 H3 5 27 7 12 4 0 . 6 4 3. 5 6 0. 5 8 0. 3 7 2 . 2 7 1 1 . 9 3 0 . 2 6 5. 7 1 13 . 0 0 18 13.327.557.82710.50708.500.0161277 27 9 81 3. 5 6 0 . 0 0 2 . 2 7 1 2 . 1 9 0 . 1 7 5. 6 7 12 . 8 9 18 13.327.557.91708.00706.700.0161279 H3 6 2 8 1 8 2 0 . 7 9 5. 4 5 0. 5 8 0. 4 6 3 . 5 1 1 2 . 3 3 0 . 1 8 5. 6 4 17 . 5 3 24 21.576.877.72706.50705.750.0091281 H3 7 28 3 92 0 . 3 9 5. 8 4 0. 5 8 0. 2 3 3 . 7 4 1 2 . 5 1 0 . 2 1 5. 6 1 18 . 6 9 27 26.996.797.32705.10704.400.0076283 H3 8 2 8 5 7 6 0 . 5 4 6. 3 7 0. 5 8 0. 3 1 4 . 0 5 1 2 . 7 2 0 . 1 6 5. 5 8 20 . 2 9 27 28.717.237.82704.40703.750.0086285 28 7 1 3 6 8. 2 6 0 . 0 0 5 . 3 9 1 2 . 8 8 0 . 3 0 5. 5 5 29 . 4 5 36 51.227.257.47703.60702.800.0059287 H3 9 29 3 26 0 . 7 5 0. 7 5 0. 7 1 0. 5 3 0 . 5 3 1 0 . 5 0 0 . 0 7 5. 9 6 3. 1 7 12 4.425.636.12708.90708.500.0154293 H4 0 29 5 1 6 9 0 . 8 0 1. 5 5 0. 7 1 0. 5 7 1 . 1 0 1 0 . 5 7 0 . 4 5 5. 9 5 6. 5 6 15 7.025.736.30708.50706.500.0118295 H4 1 A 2 8 9 6 0 0 . 3 4 0. 3 4 0. 7 1 0. 2 4 0 . 2 4 1 0 . 2 0 0 . 2 4 6. 0 2 0. 8 8 0 . 8 8 0 . 5 7 12 4.365.564.17706.90706.000.0150289 H4 1 24 9 26 0 . 6 0 0. 6 0 0. 7 1 0. 4 3 0 . 4 3 9 . 0 0 0 . 0 7 6. 2 2 4. 3 4 15 8.016.546.64704.40704.000.0154249 H4 2 24 7 2 6 0 . 4 7 1. 0 7 0. 7 1 0. 3 3 0 . 7 6 9 . 0 7 0 . 0 6 6. 2 1 6. 3 9 15 7.966.497.28704.00703.600.0152247 24 3 6 9 23 . 8 5 0. 0 0 1 5 . 5 4 1 9 . 5 0 0 . 1 5 4. 4 5 69 . 1 9 42 71.127.407.70702.10701.760.0050243 24 5 1 5 8 23 . 8 5 0. 0 0 1 5 . 5 4 1 9 . 6 5 0 . 3 7 4. 4 3 68 . 8 2 42 67.847.067.06697.72697.000.0046245 \\ h r g y v n a s \ D a t a \ 8 8 1 3 0 1 3 5 \ D e s i g n \ C a l c \ S t o r m \ 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - P H A S E 2 - S T O R M - R U N - B A S I N H . x l s Page 3 ST O R M S E W E R C O M P U T A T I O N S H E E T BA S I N Q PR E S T W I C K O F Y O R K V I L L E - P h a s e 2 CO M P U T E D B Y : G E K D A T E : JO B N O : YK F D - 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - 0 3 C H E C K E D B Y : D W S U P D A T E D D R A I N A G E A R E A RU N O F F FL O W T I M E RA I N F A L L T O T A L P I P E C A P A C I T Y V E L O C I T Y (FT/SEC)INVERT ELEVATIONPIPE BA S I N PI P E L E N G T H ( A C R E S ) CO E F F . "A " x " C " (M I N U T E ) IN T E N S I T Y R U N O F F D I A M E T E R F U L L FLOWINGDESIGNUPPERLOWERSLOPE TA G # ( F E E T ) IN C R E M E N T T O T A L "C " IN C R E M E N T T O T A L TO U P P E R E N D I N S E C T I O N (I N C H / H O U R(C F S ) ( I N C H E S ) ( C F S ) FULLFLOWENDENDFT/FT Q1 78 6 2 6 0 . 8 7 0. 8 7 0. 7 1 0. 6 2 0 . 6 2 8 . 0 0 0 . 0 7 6. 3 9 3. 9 7 12 4.425.636.47708.80708.400.01547860.450 Q2 78 9 2 0 0 . 9 5 1. 8 3 0. 7 1 0. 6 8 1 . 3 0 1 1 . 3 0 0 . 0 5 5. 8 2 7. 5 5 15 7.916.456.89707.90707.600.01507890.358 TO F E S 79 1 16 8 0 . 0 0 1. 8 3 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 1 . 3 0 1 1 . 3 5 0 . 3 5 5. 8 2 7. 5 4 15 8.556.977.98669.95697.000.01757911.012 \\ h r g y v n a s \ D a t a \ 8 8 1 3 0 1 3 5 \ D e s i g n \ C a l c \ S t o r m \ 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - P H A S E 2 - S T O R M - R U N - B A S I N Q . x l s Page 1 Reference: PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION: Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report Basin Drainage Area (acres)CN Tc (hrs) Required Volume (ac-ft) Filled Depression Volume (ac-ft) Total Required Volume (ac-ft) Provided Volume (ac-ft) 234.82740.5511.753.4815.2312.50 3A20.49740.287.811.299.107.97 3B30.18730.566.770.136.907.04 3C1.00630.170.070.000.070.25 447.43740.8713.030.0013.0316.68 Totals =133.9239.424.9044.3244.44 Total Drainage Area (acres) *Allowable 2-yr Release Rate (cfs) **Required 2-yr Release Rate (cfs) ***Final 2-yr Release Rate (cfs) *Allowable 25-yr Release Rate (cfs) **Required 25-yr Release Rate (cfs) ***Final 25-yr Release Rate (cfs) *Allowable 100-yr Release Rate (cfs) **Required 100-yr Release Rate (cfs) ***Final 100-yr Release Rate (cfs) 133.925.363.552.5310.719.495.5413.3913.137.3 * Allowable Release Rate based on Ordinance prescribed rates ** Required Release Rate is discharge calculated for "Required Volume" XP-SWMM model *** Final Release Rate is discharge calculated for "Proposed Conditions" XP-SWMM model utilizing depressional storage 24-Hour Storm Detention Summary (Phase II) J.U.L.I.E. JOINT UTILITY LOCATION INFORMATION FOR EXCAVATION 1-800-892-0123 PLANS PREPARED FOR: DATE NOTE: THIS SIGNATURE & SEAL ONLY APPLIES TO DESIGN INFORMATION PREPARED BY SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR INDEX OF SHEETS, SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR LIST OF HIGHWAY STANDARDS, SEE SHEET NO. 2 ENGINEERING PLANS FOR AMENT RD. A S H L E Y R D . M I N K L E R HI L L T O P R D . B L O C K R D . 126 126 71 71 NET LENGTH OF IMPROVEMENT = 3000 FT. 126 47 PENMAN ROADPRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD 3 T . 3 6 N . R . 7 E . T . 3 6 N . R . 7 E . LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) PROJECT LOCATION MR. DAVID KNOTT PHONE: (708) 606-7220 YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC 9009 ROUTE 126, UNIT B YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60491 PHONE: (630) 882-8800 FAX: (630) 882-8807 PROJECT CONTACT: ANDREW SVIHRA, P.E., PRINCIPAL (630) 553-7560 BENCHMARKS: ENGINEERING CONTACTS: 1 COVER SHEET BM1: PK NAIL IN CENTER LINE OF RTE 126, WEST OF INTERSECTION OF ASHLEY ROAD AND RTE 126.. ELEV. = 717.62 (NAVD 88) BM2: PK NAIL IN CENTER LINE OF RTE 126, SOUTH EASTERLY OF INTERSECTION OF RTE 126 AND WEST LINE OF PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION. ELEV. = 739.75 (NAVD 88) LOCAL BENCHMARK: YORKVILLE, 1.5 MILES SE OF, ALONG IL ROUTE 126, 370’ EAST OF THE IL ROUTE 71 AND IL ROUTE 126 INTERSECTION, 36’ NORTH OF AND NORMAL TO CENTER OF IL ROUTE 126, 8’ WEST OF TELEPHONE POLE IN CONCRETE POST STANDARD TABLET STAMPED "TT 14 GT 1952" ELEV. = 727.65 KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS NE 1/4 OF SEC. 10, TWP. 36N. R. 7E., KENDALL TOWNSHIP KENDALL TOWNSHIP, SECTION 10, T. 36 N. - R. 7 E. MATTHEW SVIHRA, E.I., CIVIL ENGINEER II (630) 553-7560 ILLINOIS REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 062-028196 MY LICENSE EXPIRES ON 11-30-2009 Illinois Professional Design Firm # 184-000108 SEC GROUP, INC. www.secgroupinc.com engineering@secgroupinc.com 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL 60560 t. 630.553.7560 f. 630.553.7646 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ c o v 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 0 9 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 INDEX OF SHEETS LIST OF STANDARDS _ _ _ _ _ _ ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PENMAN ROAD ASHLEY ROAD ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PENMAN ROAD ASHLEY ROAD 1 2 3 4 5 7 10 11 12 15 16 18 22 38 39 INDEX OF SHEETS AND LIST OF STANDARDS - - - - - - - 6 9 14 17 21 37 42 2 COVER SHEET INDEX OF SHEETS / LIST OF STANDARDS SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES GENERAL NOTES TYPICAL SECTIONS PLAN & PROFILES PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS INTERSECTION PAVEMENT ELEVATION PLAN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLANS CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CROSS SECTIONS 280001-04 406201-01 482001-02 482011-03 542306-01 542311 542401 601001-02 601101 701001-01 701006-02 701011-01 701201-02 701301-02 701306-01 701311-02 701326-02 701901 720001 720006-01 720011 728001 780001-01 781001-02 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS MAILBOX TURNOUT HMA SHOULDER ADJACENT TO FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT HMA SHOULDER STRIPS/SHOULDERS WITH RESURFACING OR WIDENING AND RESURFACING PROJECTS PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE ELLIPTICAL FLARED END SECTION GRATING FOR CONCRETE FLARED END SECTION METAL END SECTION FOR PIPE CULVERTS SUB-SURFACE DRAINS CONCRETE HEADWALL FOR PIPE DRAIN OFF-ROAD OPERATIONS, 2L, 2W, 4.5m (15’) MIN. AWAY FOR SPEEDS > 45 MPH OFF-ROAD OPERATIONS, 2L, 2W, 4.5m (15’) TO 600mm (24") FROM PAVEMENT EDGE FOR SPEED > 45 MPH OFF-ROAD MOVING OPERATIONS, 2L, 2W, DAY ONLY FOR SPEEDS > 45 MPH LANE CLOSURE, 2L, 2W, DAY ONLY ON-ROAD TO 600mm (24") OFF-ROAD FOR SPEEDS > 45 MPH LANE CLOSURE, 2L, 2W, SHORT TIME OPERATIONS LANE CLOSURE, 2L, 2W, SLOW MOVING OPERATIONS - DAY ONLY FOR SPEEDS > 45 MPH LANE CLOSURE, 2L, 2W, MOVING OPERATIONS - DAY ONLY LANE CLOSURE, 2L, 2W, PAVEMENT WIDENING FOR SPEEDS > 45 MPH TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SIGN PANEL MOUNTING DETAILS SIGN PANEL ERECTION DETAILS METAL POSTS FOR SIGNS, MARKERS & DELINEATORS TELESCOPING STEEL SIGN SUPPORT TYPICAL PAVEMENT MARKING TYPICAL APPLICATIONS RAISED REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ i n d 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 1 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 CODE NUMBER PAY ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES CODE NUMBER PAY ITEM UNIT QUANTITY 3 CU YD CU YD SQ YD ACRE POUND POUND POUND SQ YD POUND EACH FOOT EACH SQ YD TON SQ YD GALLON TON TON TON TON SQ YD SQ YD SQ YD SQ YD FOOT TON SQ YD EACH FOOT EACH FOOT FOOT EACH CY FOOT FOOT FOOT SQ FT L SUM L SUM L SUM CAL DA FOOT SQ FT SQ FT EACH EACH FOOT 20200100 20800150 21101615 25000210 25000400 25000500 25000600 25100630 28000250 28000300 28000400 28000500 28100707 28200200 31100100 35501326 40300100 40600300 40600625 40603335 40800050 44000100 44000155 44000158 4400020 44300200 48101200 48203029 50105200 54010502 54213669 542A0229 54201480 54215550 60600095 60603800 60608600 60610400 60618300 70100450 70100460 70100500 70103815 70300100 70301000 72000100 72400100 72400500 EARTH EXCAVATION TRENCH BACKFILL TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE, 4" SEEDING, CLASS 2A NITROGEN FERTILIZER NUTRIENT PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POTASSIUM FERTILIZER NUTRIENT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS PERIMETER EROSION BARRIER INLET AND PIPE PROTECTION STONE DUMPED RIPRAP, CLASS A4 FILTER FABRIC SUB-BASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE A HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, 10.5 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (PRIME COAT) AGGREGATE (PRIME COAT) LEVELING BINDER (MACHINE METHOD) HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX "D", N50 INCIDENTAL HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACING PAVEMENT REMOVAL HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL, 1 1/2" HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL, 2 1/4" DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVAL STRIP REFLECTIVE CRACK CONTROL TREATMENT AGGREGATE SHOULDERS, TYPE B HOT-MIX ASPHALT SHOULDERS 8" REMOVE EXISTING CULVERTS PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT 5’ X 2’ PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FLARED END SECTIONS 24" PIPE CULVERTS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 24" PIPE CULVERTS, TYPE 2, CORRUGATED STEEL OR ALUMINUM CULVERT PIPE 15" METAL END SECTIONS 15" CLASS SI CONCRETE (OUTLET) COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.12 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE M-6.06 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE M-6.24 CONCRETE MEDIAN SURFACE, 4" TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION, STANDARD 701201 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION, STANDARD 701306 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION, STANDARD 701326 TRAFFIC CONTROL SURVEILLANCE SHORT-TERM PAVEMENT MARKING WORK ZONE PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL SIGN PANEL, TYPE 1 REMOVE SIGN PANEL ASSEMBLY - TYPE A RELOCATE SIGN PANEL ASSEMBLY - TYPE A 6,250 16 9,260 3 270 270 270 14,520 600 9 7739 2 16 54 4,118 3,558 4,635 32 811 1,378 3 851 1,916 8,812 157 5,250 4,116 2,702 2 27 2 102 84 4 3 51.0 23.0 39.0 177 1 1 1 5 404 135 13 2 3 72800100 72900100 78000100 78000200 78000500 78000600 78000650 78100100 Z0004500 TELESCOPING STEEL SIGN SUPPORT METAL POST - TYPE A THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINE - LETTERS AND SYMBOLS THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINE - 4" THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINE - 8" THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINE - 12" THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINE - 24" RAISED REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKER BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 8" FOOT FOOT SQ FT FOOT FOOT FOOT FOOT EACH SQ YD 15 28.5 281 22,439 1,632 631 68 181 319 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ s u m 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 2 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 LEVELING BINDER (MACHINE METHOD), SUPERPAVE, N50 ITEM AC TYPE VOIDS RAP % PG 64-22 PG 64-22 4% @ 50 GYR.15 N/A GENERAL NOTES GRANULAR MATERIALS BITUMINOUS MAT PRIME COAT AGGREGATE PRIME COAT SHORT TERM PAVEMENT MARKING FT / 100 FT / APPLICATION TONS / CU YD TONS / SQ YD LBS / SQ YD / IN 2.05 0.002 0.375 0.08 112 10 GAL / SQ YD (ON BITUMINOUS) GAL / SQ YD (ON AGGREGATE) HMA CONCRETE 21. WHEN A PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FLARED END SECTION IS USED AT THE END OF A PIPE CULVERT, THE LENGTH OF THE STORM SEWER PIPE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE LENGTH OF THE END SECTIONS. THE SLOPE OF THE PIPE IS CALCULATED BY INCLUDING THE LENGTH OF THE END SECTIONS. 22. FRAME ELEVATIONS GIVEN ON THE PLANS ARE ONLY TO ASSIST THE CONTRACTOR IN DETERMINING THE APPROXIMATE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE. FRAMES ON ADJUSTED STRUCTURES WILL BE ADJUSTED TO THE FINAL ELEVATION OF THE AREA IN WHICH THEY ARE LOCATED AS PART OF THE STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT COST. 23. ALL WORK PERFORMED RELATIVE TO THIS IMPROVEMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF O.S.H.A. 24. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE 4" OF TOPSOIL ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS, RAKED SMOOTH IN PREPARATION FOR LANDSCAPING ACTIVITIES (SEEDING, ETC.), WHICH WILL BE PAID FOR AS TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE 4". 25. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH CLASS 2A SEEDING FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF THE TOPSOIL, AND PROVIDE FERTILIZER AND AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. THIS WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 250 AND 251 OF THE IDOT "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS." 26. THE QUANTITIES GIVEN IN THE ENGINEER’S BID PROPOSAL ARE INTENDED AS A GUIDE FOR THE CONTRACTOR IN DETERMINING THE SCOPE OF THE COMPLETED PROJECT. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE ALL MATERIAL QUANTITIES AND APPRAISE HIMSELF OF ALL SITE CONDITIONS. NO CLAIMS FOR EXTRA WORK WILL BE RECOGNIZED UNLESS ORDERED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. 27. A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE FOR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DEVELOPER, ENGINEER, COUNTY ENGINEER, IDOT AND CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH CONSTRUCTION, AT A TIME AND PLACE CONVENIENT FOR ALL PARTIES, FOR REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR’S CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES, TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING SHOP DRAWINGS AND OTHER SUBMITTALS AND TO ESTABLISH A WORKING UNDERSTANDING AMONG THE PARTIES AS TO THE CONTRACT WORK. 28. THE FOLLOWING RATES OF APPLICATION HAVE BEEN USED IN CALCULATING PLAN QUANTITIES: HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, SUPERPAVE, MIX D, N50 25 254% @ 50 GYR. 4% @ 50 GYR. PG 64-22 HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, SUPERPAVE HOT-MIX ASPHALT SHOULDERS PG 58-22 2% @ 50 GYR.25 HOT-MIX ASPHALT MIXTURE REQUIREMENT 1. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT CONSISTS OF SUPPLYING ALL THE NECESSARY LABOR, MATERIAL, AND EQUIPMENT TO SATISFACTORILY CONSTRUCT AND INSTALL ALL IMPROVEMENTS ACCORDING TO THE PLANS DESIGNATED "PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD." 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE RESIDENTS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. IN ADDITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS TO ALL ABUTTING PROPERTY AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, EXCEPT FOR PERIODS OF SHORT DURATION AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT RICH BALLERINI FROM THE PERMIT SECTION AT THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT 3 (815-434-8490), THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (630-553-4350), AND THE KENDALL COUNTY ENGINEER, FRAN KLAAS (630-553-7616) A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, AND UTLITY COMPANIES. 5. ALL OFFSET DISTANCES GIVEN ON THE PLANS ARE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE PROPOSED ROAD. ALL OFFSETS FOR THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES LOCATED IN THE CURB AND GUTTER ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB. OFFSETS FOR ALL OTHER STRUCTURES ARE TO THE CENTER OF THE GRATE. 6. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE ON THE U.S.G.S. DATUM. 7. PRIOR TO ANY EMBANKMENT PLACEMENT, ALL VEGETATION AND UNSITABLE MATERIAL (I.E. TOPSOIL) SHOULD BE REMOVED TO THE DEPTH ENCOUNTERED AND REPLACED WITH SUITABLE EMBANKMENT MATERIAL. ANY EMBANKMENT WIDENING ON EXISTING SLOPES SHOULD BE BENCHED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 205 OF THE IDOT "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION." 8. THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE SHALL BE FREE OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY (TESTING FOR COMPACTION SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR). 9. THE CONTRACTOR MAY NOT REMOVE ANY EXCESS MATERIAL FROM THE SITE EXCEPT AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER. IF MATERIAL IS TO BE REMOVED, IT SHALL BE REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ARTICLE 202.03. 10. ALL SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE 1:3 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. ALL DITCH AND DRAINAGE GRADES SHALL BE AT LEAST 0.70% MINIMUM SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 11. OPEN-CUT TRENCHES SHALL BE SHEETED AND BRACED AS REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES, AND AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT LIFE, PROPERTY, OR THE WORK. 12. WHERE FIRM FOUNDATION IS NOT ENCOUNTERED AT THE GRADE ESTABLISHED DUE TO UNSUITABLE SOIL, ALL SUCH UNSUITALBE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH APPROVED COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIAL, WHICH WILL NOT BE PAID FOR SEPARATELY. 14. CONTRACTORS SHALL AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN AMPLE MEANS AND DEVICES WITH WHICH TO REMOVE AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL WATER ENTERING THE EXCAVATIONS. 15. ALL TRENCH BACKFILL QUANTITIES FOR PIPE CULVERTS HAVE BEEN COMPUTED AND SHALL BE PAID FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS BUREAU OF CONSTRUCTION TRENCH BACKFILL TABLE BASED ON PIPE SIZE AND INVERT DEPTH FROM SUBGRADE. 16. AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER, AFTER BACKFILLING THE TRENCH, ALL DITCHING, GRADING AND SHAPING NECESSARY TO RESTORE THE ORIGINAL DRAINAGE IN THE AREA OF WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED. TEMPORARY DRAINAGE FACILITIES MEETING THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 17. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROPERLY CONTROL EROSION ON THE JOB SITE THROUGH THE USE OF SILTATION PONDS, FILTER FABRICS, ETC. ANY SILTATION OF CONDUITS, STRUCTURES, OR DITCHES SHALL BE CLEANED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SEEDING HAS TAKEN HOLD. ALL WASHOUTS, GULLIES, ETC. WILL BE REGRADED AND SEEDED USING TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING BY THE CONTRACTOR. 18. THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR EROSION CONTROL SHALL EXIST THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANUP OF PAVED SURFACES DAILY WITHIN AND OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT LIMITS CAUSED BY THE PROJECT OPERATIONS. 19. EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES MUST BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY STORM OF ONE HALF INCH OF RAINFALL OR GREATER BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENT NEEDED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL MUST BE MADE IMMEDIATELY AND AT THE CONTRACTOR’S EXPENSE. 20. ALL EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF THE "STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL" AS PUBLISHED BY THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. GENERAL NOTES 37. NO PLANS SHALL BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS SPECIFICALLY MARKED "FOR CONSTRUCTION." AND UNLESS STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AFFECTING THEIR WORK WITH THE ACTUAL CONDITIONS AT THE JOB SITE. IN ADDITION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THE ENGINEER’S LINE AND GRADE STAKES. IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPENCIES FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, HE MUST IMMEDIATELY REPORT THE SAME TO THE ENGINEER BEFORE DOING ANY WORK, OTHERWISE THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY. IN THE EVENT OF DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR SPECIAL DETAILS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY PART OF THE WORK AFFECTED BY OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. FAILING TO SECURE SUCH INSTRUCTIONS, THE CONTRANCTOR WILL BE COSIDERED TO HAVE PROCEEDED AT HIS OWN RISK AND EXPENSE. IN THE EVENT OF ANY DOUBT OR QUESTION ARISING WITH RESPECT TO THE TRUE MEANING OF THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS, THE DECISION OF THE ENGINEER SHALL BE FINAL AND CONCLUSIVE. 38. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VISITING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE IN ORDER TO BETTER CARRY OUT THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSIGNED BY THE DEVELOPER AND UNDERTAKEN BY THE ENGINEER. THE ENGINEER SHALL NOT, DURING SUCH VISITS OR AS A RESULT OF SUCH OBSERVATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR’S WORK IN PROGRESS, SUPERVISE, DIRECT, HAVE CONTROL OVER THE CONTRACTOR’S WORK, NOR SHALL THE ENGINEER HAVE THE AUTHORITY OVER THE RESPONSIBLITY FOR THE MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES OF CONSTRUCTION SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK OF THE CONTRACTOR, OR FOR ANY FAILURE OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS, ORDINANCES, CODES OR ORDERS APPLICABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR FURNISHING AND PERFORMING HIS WORK. ACCORDINGLY, THE ENGINEER CAN NEITHER GUARANTEE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS BY THE CONTRACTOR NOR ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO FURNISH AND PERFORM HIS WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 39. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE AND MAINTAIN SUCH INSURANCE FROM AN INSURANCE COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO WRITE CASUALTY INSURANCE IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS AS WILL PROTECT HIMSELF, YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC., IDOT, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., KENDALL COUNTY AND HIS SUBCONTRACTORS AND HIS EMPLOYEES FROM CLAIMS FOR BODILY INJURY, DEATH, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE WHICH MAY ARISE FROM DEVELOPING THE PROPERTY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMMENCE WORK UNTIL HE HAS OBTAINED ALL INSURANCE REQUIRED UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH AND FILED THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE OR THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE INSURANCE POLICY WITH YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC, IDOT, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. AND KENDALL COUNTY. EACH INSURANCE POLICY SHALL CONTAIN A CLAUSE PROVIDING THAT IT SHALL NOT BE CANCELED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY WITHOUT THIRTY (30) DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO KENDALL COUNTY, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., IDOT AND YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC. OF INTENTION TO CANCEL. THE AMOUNT OF SUCH INSURANCE SHALL BE AS REQUIRED BY THE IDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 107.27. 40. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., AND KENDALL COUNTY AND IT’S EMPLOYEES FROM AND AGAINST ALL LOSSES AND ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, PAYMENTS, SUITS, ACTIONS, RECOVERIES AND JUDGEMENTS OF EVERY NATURE AND DESCRIPTION BROUGHT OR RECOVERED AGAINST HIM BY REASON OF ANY OMISSION OR ACT OF THE CONTRACTOR, HIS AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, IN THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK OR IN THE GUARDING OF IT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN IN THE NAME OF YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND SHALL MAINTAIN AND PAY THE PREMIUMS FOR SUCH INSURANCE IN SUCH AMOUNT AND WITH SUCH PROVISIONS AS WILL PROTECT THE COUNTY FROM CONTINGENT LIABILITY AND COPY OF SUCH INSURANCE POLICY OR POLICIES SHALL BE DELIVERED TO YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC. FULL COMPLIANCE BY YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC.WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF SUCH INSURANCE POLICY OR POLICIES SHALL BE A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC. RIGHT TO ENFORCE AGAINST THE CONTRACTOR ANY PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE. 41. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE BUREAU OF OPERATIONS, BOB ETZENBACH, (PHONE:815-434-8511, FAX:815-434-6998), WITH A CONTACT PERSON THAT IS AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK, TO CORRECT ANY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEFICIENCIES. 4 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ g e n 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 4 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 ~ ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 P.G.L. EXISTING ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 TYPICAL SECTION ~ ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PROPOSED ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 TYPICAL SECTION 40’ & VARIES 40’ & VARIES LANELANE 12’ EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) 40’ & VARIES 40’ & VARIES 18’ & VARIES 12’12’ LANE LANE 5"+- EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) 12’ 4%* 4:1 4: 1 TURN LANE VARIES 0’-12’ TURN LANE VARIES 0’-12’ VAR. 1’-18’ 20’ MIN. STA. 101+47 TO STA. 117+54 3:1 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SHOULDERS, 8" (TYP.) AGG. SHOULDERS, TYPE A, 6" (TYP.) SAWCUT TO PROVIDE SMOOTH EDGE (TYP.) SUBBASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE A, 16" (TYP.) E X R O W E X R O W P R R O W E X R O W 2’ TYPICAL SECTIONS PENMAN ROAD & ASHLEY ROAD E X R O W * ALGEBRAIC DIFFERENCE IN SLOPE BETWEEN THE DRIVING LANE AND THE PAVED SHOULDER NOT TO EXCEED 8%. SLOPE OF THE PAVED SHOULDER TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. **SLOPE OF THE PAVED SHOULDER SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE SUPERELEVATION RATE, BUT NOT LESS THAN 4%. ***SLOPE OF THE AGGREGATE SHOULDER SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE SUPERELEVATION RATE, BUT NOT LESS THAN 6%. P.C.C. BASE COURSE (VARIES 4"-12") VAR. 1’-6’ HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE OVERLAY, HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE WIDENING (VARIES) +-4" HOT-MIX ASPHALT BINDER COURSE, HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL, 2 1/2" 1 1/2" HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, N50 HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, 10 1/2" (TYP.) STA. 106+20.70 TO STA. 142+42.00 STA. 106+20.70 TO STA. 122+03.00 AND STA. 128+46.00 TO STA. 142+42.00 5’4’ VAR.VAR.VAR.VAR. 4’5’ ~ ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PROPOSED ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 TYPICAL SECTION 40’ & VARIES 40’ & VARIES LANE LANE EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) E X R O W E X R O W STA. 122+03.00 TO STA. 128+46.00 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL, 1 1/2" 1 1/2" HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, N50 13’ & VARIES 13’ & VARIES EXISTING AGGREGATE SHOULDER (TYP) 5’3’ 1" LEVELING BINDER (MACHINE METHOD), N50 6" 6%*** 6%4%* 3’5’ 5’3’ 6%***4%* HOT-MIX ASPHALT SHOULDERS, 8" (TYP.) AGG. SHOULDERS, TYPE A, 6" (TYP.) 5’3’ 4%*6%*** MIN. 1.5% & VARIES MIN. 1.5% & VARIES % VARIES % VARIES 5 VARIES 24’-48’ % VARIES % VARIES (TYP.) S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ t y p 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 6 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 P.G.L. LANE LANELANE ~ PENMAN ROAD EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) P.G.L. LANE LANELANE 4:1 ~ ASHLEY ROAD SUBBASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE A, 4" EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) 4:1 12’12’12’ 40’ & VARIES40’ & VARIES 12’12’3’VARIES 0’-12’ AGG SHOULDERS, TYPE A, 6" (TYP.) 40’40’ 2%2% 2%2% 4%4% SUBBASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE A, 4" COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.12 (TYP.) P R R O W P R R O W P R R O W P R R O W2:1 2’ 6" P.G.L. LANE ~ ASHLEY ROAD EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) 40’40’ P R R O W P R R O W EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION PENMAN ROAD STA. 1104+30.00 TO STA. 1105+62.12 TYPICAL SECTIONS PENMAN ROAD & ASHLEY ROAD - - VARIES VARIES 21’ 10’11’ P.C.C. BASE COURSE (VARIES 4"-12") HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, 10 1/2" 1 1/2" HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, N50 HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, +4" HOT-MIX ASPHALT BINDER COURSE, +5" 1 1/2" HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, N50 HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, 10 1/2" ASHLEY ROAD STA. 202+85.00 TO STA. 206+60.37 ASHLEY ROAD STA. 202+85.00 TO STA. 206+60.37 4:14:1 3’3’ 6 1" LEVELING BINDER (MACHINE METHOD), N50 1" LEVELING BINDER (MACHINE METHOD), N50 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ t y p 0 2 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 8 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 1003CURVE IL126-2 DELTA =32%%d 13’ 29.68" (LT) PI STA. =122+72.08 R =1,760.00 T =508.41 L =989.88 E =71.96 PC STA. = 117+63.67 PT STA. = 127+53.54 T =381.75 CURVE IL126-1 PI STA. =103+81.75 DELTA =5%%d 59’ 13.43" (RT) R =7,300.00 L =762.81 E =9.97 PC STA. = 100+00.00 PT STA. = 107+62.81 CURVE IL126-1 CURVE IL126-2 89^51’20.5" 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 0 6 + 2 0 . 7 0 240’ STORAGE1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ R= 60’-200’ 5’ OFFSET R=200’ R=2’ 6 ’ PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER P C S T A . 1 1 7 + 6 3 . 6 7 P T S T A . 1 0 7 + 6 2 . 8 1 F E + 1 1 ~ PENMAN ROAD IL ROUTE 126 PROPOSED ROADWAY BY OTHERS COMB. CONC. CURB & GUTTER, TYPE B6.12 12’ 740 710 720 730 705 715 725 735 ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 ~ PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 25’ 12’12’12’ BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1104+30.00 PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER + 2 3 + 6 3 + 0 3 + 0 3 240’ TAPER PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER 240’ STORAGE300’ TAPER 300’ TAPER (50:1) OUTLOT OWNED (BY OTHERS) P R O P E R T Y LI N E 700 700 740 710 720 730 705 715 725 735 PENMAN ROAD PROPOSED CULVERT PIPE, 15 " W/ 2 FLARED END SECTIONS R= 60’-200’ 5’ OFFSET PROPOSED 4’ BIT SHOULDER + 0 0 9 SY RIPRAP 7 SY RIPRAP ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PLAN AND PROFILE 300’ TAPER ( 5 0 : 1 ) 118+25.0 40.00’ RT 118+25.0 60.00’ RT 6 0 ’ EX ROW PR ROW EX ROW PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW + 6 0 + 6 0 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ + 6 0 + 6 0 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 114+14.78 84.75’ RT 114+74.18 60.00’ RT STA. 114+22.70, 50’ RT PRC FES 24" INV. = 713.30 112+75.46 60.0’ RT 113+34.80 84.75’ RT STA. 113+18.99, 50’ RT PRC FES 24" INV. = 713.60 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ M A T C H L I N E S T A 1 2 2 + 0 3 . 0 0 PROPOSED PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT 5’ X 2’ RELOCATE SIGN AND SUPPORT REMOVE "NO PASSING ZONE" SIGN 115 LIN FT PIPE CULVERT CL-A1 24" @ 0.30% PROPOSED 4’ BIT SHOULDER PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER 7 NOTE: FROM STA 122+03 TO 128+46 THERE WILL BE 1 1/2" MILLING AND 1 1/2" OVERLAY ON MAINLINE. NO WIDENING IS PROPOSED. 105+00 110+00 115+00 120+00 1 1 0 0 + 0 0 1 1 0 5 + 0 0 12121212 1212 12" CMP 12" CM P R3 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p p 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 9 A M I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 0 6 + 2 0 . 6 5 > PENMAN ROAD PROPOSED/EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE 2.88 % 718.22 0.125% 714.57 714.35 0.300% 713.70 714.30 P I S T A . 1 1 0 + 0 0 E L E V . 7 1 6 . 4 4 P I S T A . 1 1 3 + 0 0 E L E V . 7 1 3 . 6 6 P I S T A . 1 1 3 + 7 5 E L E V . 7 1 3 . 4 4 P I S T A . 1 1 4 + 2 5 E L E V . 7 1 3 . 2 9 712.10 P I S T A . 1 0 8 + 2 5 E L E V . 7 2 1 . 0 0 PROPOSED BOX CULVERT P I S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 E L E V . 7 1 4 . 8 2 +3.48% +0.30% 713.08 715.87 ELEV. = 712.10 PROPOSED LEFT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED RIGHT DITCH PROFILE 725.00 -3.2 0 % -2.61 % -0.92% -0.30% 7 8 9 110+00 1 2 3 4 115+00 6 7 8 9 120+00 1 2 7 2 9 . 7 3 7 2 7 . 9 2 7 2 6 . 1 9 7 2 4 . 5 2 7 2 3 . 0 3 7 2 1 . 7 0 7 2 0 . 5 5 7 1 9 . 6 3 7 1 8 . 8 9 7 1 8 . 3 6 7 1 8 . 0 3 7 1 7 . 8 2 7 1 7 . 6 7 7 1 7 . 5 7 7 1 7 . 4 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 1 9 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 6 . 9 3 7 1 6 . 8 2 7 1 6 . 7 0 7 1 6 . 6 1 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 7 2 9 . 7 3 7 2 7 . 9 2 7 2 6 . 1 9 7 2 4 . 5 2 7 2 3 . 0 3 7 2 1 . 7 0 7 2 0 . 5 5 7 1 9 . 6 3 7 1 8 . 8 9 7 1 8 . 3 6 7 1 8 . 0 3 7 1 7 . 8 2 7 1 7 . 6 7 7 1 7 . 5 7 7 1 7 . 4 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 1 9 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 6 . 9 3 7 1 6 . 8 2 7 1 6 . 7 0 7 1 6 . 6 1 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p p 0 2 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 2 4 A M I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 8 9 120+00 1 2 3 4 125+00 6 7 8 9 130+00 1 2 3 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 7 1 7 . 9 3 7 1 8 . 1 1 7 1 8 . 2 4 7 1 8 . 3 3 7 1 8 . 3 7 7 1 8 . 2 8 7 1 8 . 0 9 7 1 7 . 9 2 7 1 7 . 7 8 7 1 7 . 6 5 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 0.300% 713.70 714.30 713.89 715.85 712.10 713.30 714.13 PROPOSED BOX CULVERT P I S T A . 1 2 9 + 5 0 E L E V . 7 1 5 . 0 4 +2.30% +0.25% P I S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 E L E V . 7 1 4 . 8 2 +3.48% +0.30% 713.08 715.87 PROPOSED LEFT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED RIGHT DITCH PROFILE 7 1 7 . 9 3 7 1 8 . 1 1 7 1 8 . 2 4 7 1 8 . 3 3 7 1 8 . 3 7 7 1 8 . 2 8 7 1 8 . 0 9 7 1 7 . 9 2 7 1 7 . 7 8 7 1 7 . 6 5 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 125+00 12 12 12" CMP 8 9 120+00 1 2 3 4 125+00 6 7 8 9 130+00 1 2 3 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 7 1 7 . 9 3 7 1 8 . 1 1 7 1 8 . 2 4 7 1 8 . 3 3 7 1 8 . 3 7 7 1 8 . 2 8 7 1 8 . 0 9 7 1 7 . 9 2 7 1 7 . 7 8 7 1 7 . 6 5 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 7 1 7 . 9 3 7 1 8 . 1 1 7 1 8 . 2 4 7 1 8 . 3 3 7 1 8 . 3 7 7 1 8 . 2 8 7 1 8 . 0 9 7 1 7 . 9 2 7 1 7 . 7 8 7 1 7 . 6 5 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PLAN AND PROFILE 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 CURVE IL126-2 DELTA =32%%d 13’ 29.68" (LT) PI STA. =122+72.08 R =1,760.00 T =508.41 L =989.88 E =71.96 PC STA. = 117+63.67 PT STA. = 127+53.54 EX ROW 3 6 0 ’ EXISTING BOX CULVERT NOTE: FROM STA 122+03 TO 128+46 THERE WILL BE 1 1/2" MILLING AND 1 1/2" OVERLAY ON MAINLINE. NO WIDENING IS PROPOSED. EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING AGG SHOULDER PR ROW EX ROW CURVE IL126-2 MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 2 + 0 3 . 0 0 M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 740 735 730 725 720 715 710 700 705 700 705 710 715 720 725 730 735 740 FE +83 OUTLOT OWNED (BY OTHERS)‘ M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 2 + 0 3 . 0 0 M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 PROPOSED/EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE 122+98.95 60.00’ RT PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER 8 130+00 135+00 140+00 2 0 5 + 0 0 1515 15" CMP 8 9 130+00 1 2 3 4 135+00 6 7 8 9 140+00 1 2 3 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 7 1 8 . 1 6 7 1 8 . 6 2 7 1 9 . 2 8 7 1 9 . 9 6 7 2 0 . 7 9 7 2 1 . 7 1 7 2 2 . 8 1 7 2 3 . 9 7 7 2 5 . 1 3 7 2 5 . 8 7 7 2 6 . 4 9 7 2 6 . 8 6 7 2 6 . 9 9 7 2 6 . 8 9 7 2 6 . 4 9 7 2 5 . 9 4 7 2 5 . 3 2 7 2 4 . 6 6 7 2 3 . 9 9 7 2 3 . 3 5 7 2 2 . 7 4 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 4 2 + 4 2 . 0 0 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 7 1 8 . 1 6 7 1 8 . 6 2 7 1 9 . 2 8 7 1 9 . 9 6 7 2 0 . 7 9 7 2 1 . 7 1 7 2 2 . 8 1 7 2 3 . 9 7 7 2 5 . 1 3 7 2 5 . 8 7 7 2 6 . 4 9 7 2 6 . 8 6 7 2 6 . 9 9 7 2 6 . 8 9 7 2 6 . 4 9 7 2 5 . 9 4 7 2 5 . 3 2 7 2 4 . 6 6 7 2 3 . 9 9 PROPOSED/EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE > ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.97 713.89 715.85 713.30 714.13 P I S T A . 1 2 9 + 5 0 E L E V . 7 1 5 . 0 4 +2.30% +0.25% PROPOSED LEFT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED RIGHT DITCH PROFILE P I S T A . 1 3 7 + 5 0 E L E V . 7 2 3 . 2 9 +2.50% +1.20% 720.79 P I S T A . 1 3 9 + 0 0 E L E V . 7 2 5 . 0 9 +0.30% 725.32 P I S T A . 1 4 1 + 7 1 E L E V . 7 2 3 . 4 3 -0.80% -1.40% 724.59 722.10-0.92%723.50 721.20 +1.90% 720.10 P I S T A . 1 3 8 + 0 0 E L E V . 7 2 3 . 4 0 +0.30% 724.00 PROPOSED LEFT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED RIGHT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED LEFT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED RIGHT DITCH PROFILE 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p p 0 3 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 2 8 A M I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 4 2 + 4 2 . 0 0 240’ STORAGE 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 12’ 6 ’ R=200’ R=2’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.96 ~ ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 MATCHL I N E S T A . 2 0 5 + 2 5 IL ROUTE 126 PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING AGG SHOULDER 240’ STORAGE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING AGG SHOULDER 720 730 700 710 725 735 705 695 715 710 720 730 700 725 735 705 695 715 R= 55’-200’ 10’ OFFSET R= 75’-320’ 15’ OFFSET 300’ TAPER 50:1 TAPER (300’) PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 4’ BIT SHOULDER RELOCATE SIGN & SUPPORT 50:1 TAPER (300’) 50:1 TAPER (300’)50:1 TAPER (300’) + 4 6 + 4 6 + 6 2 + 0 2 + 4 2 + 6 7 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 75^29’41.46" 1 2 ’ PROPOSED CULVERT PIPE, 15 " W/ 2 FLARED END SECTIONS 25’ 25’ + 8 6 PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 4’ BIT SHOULDER ~ ASHLEY ROAD 240’ TAPER PE +03 FE +22 PE +24 FE +10 SEE DETAIL "A" DETAIL "A" 4 ’ 4’ 8 ’ R=2’ (TYP.) R=3’ STA. 134+30.83 18’ RT STA. 134+34.96 26’ RT STA. 134+72.30 18’ RT STA. 134+59.44 26’ RT STA. 206+06 8’ RT STA. 206+01.12 6’ RT R=73’ 2’ STA. 206+15.40 23.28 RT 2 ’ 2.5’ 3.5’ 0.5’ ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PLAN AND PROFILE 133+27.7 60.00’ RT 134+09.5 120.00’ RT 135+27.7 40.00’ RT 135+27.7 40.00’ RT 6 0 ’ EX ROW PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW EX ROW M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 22.6 5 ’ REMOVE STOP SIGN RELOCATE SIGN AND SUPPORT RELOCATE SIGN AND SUPPORT 9 NOTE: FROM STA 122+03 TO 128+46 THERE WILL BE 1 1/2" MILLING AND 1 1/2" OVERLAY ON MAINLINE. NO WIDENING IS PROPOSED. MATCHLINE STA. 116+00 MATCHLINE STA. 112+00 PENMAN ROAD 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 1003 710 700 720 715 695 705 725 730 735 730 710 700 720 715 695 705 725 735 > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 > PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 + 1 4 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 1 0 4 . 3 0 . 0 0 R= 60’-200’ 5’ OFFSET COMB. CONC. CURB & GUTTER, TYPE B6.12 PROPOSED 24" RCP R= 60’-200’ 5’ OFFSET 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION (BY OTHERS) 89^51’20.5" EX RO W EX RO W E X R O W E X R O W P R R O W E X R O W > PENMAN ROAD + 5 8 1 2 ’ + 3 8 + 7 0 PENMAN ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE 240’ T A P E R 132’ TA P E R 144’ STORAGE 113+34.8 84.72’ RT 112+75.5 60.00’ RT P R R O W 114+14.8 84.75’ RT 114+74.2 60.00’ RT 60’ 60’ 10 1 1 5 + 0 0 1100 + 0 0 1105+00 12121212 12 " C M P R3 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p p 0 4 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 3 3 A M I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 7 1 6 . 4 4 7 1 6 . 5 8 7 1 6 . 5 7 7 1 6 . 7 4 7 1 6 . 9 2 7 1 6 . 7 7 7 1 6 . 3 2 7 1 6 . 1 9 7 1 6 . 0 8 7 1 6 . 1 0 7 1 6 . 1 6 7 1 7 . 2 5 21100+00 1 3 4 1105+00 BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1104+30.00 ELEV. = 718.04 PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION (BY OTHERS) EX PENMAN ROAD PR PENMAN ROAD > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 > PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 ELEVATION 717.38 7 2 0 . 8 0 +0.62%-4. 0 0 % VPI STA. 1104+22 ELEV = 717.34 -4. 0 0 % VPI STA. 1104+87 ELEV = 716.04 -2.00% L = 80.00’ VPI STA. 1105+44 ELEV = 717.18 +2.00% +1.09% 7 2 1 . 1 1 7 2 1 . 3 0 7 2 0 . 2 2 7 1 8 . 2 3 7 1 6 . 7 9 7 1 6 . 4 8 7 1 7 . 2 5 ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.96 ~ ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 ASHLEY ROAD MAT C H L I N E S T A . 1 3 6 + 0 0 MAT C H L I N E S T A . 1 3 2 + 0 0 115’ STORAGE + 3 5 + 1 0 ~ ASHLEY ROAD PR ROW 700 710 720 725 705 695 715 730 735 715 700 710 720 725 705 695 730 735 PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 3’ AGG SHOULDER 35:1 TAPER (180’) 35:1 TAPER (180’) 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 E N D I M P R O V M E N T S S T A . 2 0 2 + 8 5 . 0 0 75^29’41.46" IL L I N O I S R O U T E 1 2 6 + 2 5 + 9 5 PROPOSED 4’ BIT SHOULDER ASHLEY ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE 4 0 ’ 134+09.5 120.00’ RT 133+27.7 60.00’ RT 134+87.0 100.08’ RT 134+83.1 85.00’ RT 135+27.7 40.00’ RT 60’ 1 0 ’ 1 2 ’ 11 1 3 5 + 0 0 200+00 205+00 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p p 0 5 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 3 6 A M I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 207+44.10 ELEVATION 718.71 PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE PROPOSED DITCHLINE RIGHT SIDE VPI STA. 206+30 ELEV = 718.11 +1.88% +2.00% MILL & RESURFACE STA. 205+50.00 ELEV. = 716.60 +1.97% 708.60 715.50 B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 2 0 2 + 8 5 E L E V A T I O N 7 0 9 . 9 2 200+00 201+00 202+00 203+00 204+00 205+00 206+00 7 0 8 . 1 4 7 0 8 . 3 3 7 0 8 . 5 7 7 0 8 . 8 9 7 0 9 . 2 8 7 0 9 . 9 2 7 1 0 . 7 3 7 1 1 . 6 4 7 1 2 . 8 0 7 1 4 . 1 2 7 1 5 . 5 5 7 1 6 . 6 0 7 1 7 . 2 7 7 1 8 . 7 1 7 0 9 . 9 2 7 1 0 . 7 3 7 1 1 . 6 4 7 1 2 . 8 0 7 1 4 . 1 2 7 1 5 . 5 5 7 1 6 . 6 0 7 1 7 . 5 4 7 1 8 . 5 0 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 R=200’ P C S T A . 1 0 7 + 6 2 . 8 1 ~ PENMAN ROAD PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW PR ROW 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 8" SKIP DASH, WHITE 2’ DASH - 6’ SKIP 8" LANE LINE, WHITE TURN ARROW, WHITE 15.6 SQ. FT. (TYP.) 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE TURN ARROW, WHITE 15.6 SQ. FT. (TYP.) 8" SKIP DASH, WHITE 2’ SKIP - 6’ DASH 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 4" DOUBLE YELLOW P T S T A . 1 1 7 + 6 3 . 6 7 ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 ~ PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 8" LANE LINE, WHITE P E N M A N R O A D IL ROUTE 126 R=2’ NOTE: 12" DIAGONALS, YELLOW, 30’ C-C (TYP.) 8" LANE LINE, WHITE 8" SKIP DASH, WHITE 2’ SKIP - 6’ DASH 4" DOUBLE YELLOW R1-1-3030 * + 0 0 + 2 3 + 6 0 + 6 0 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ + 6 3 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE + 6 0 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ 24" STOP BAR, WHITE STA. 1105+10 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ +49.7 12’ 6’ +17.7 12’ 6’ + 0 3 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 12" DIAGONALS, YELLOW, 30’ C-C (TYP.) 12" DIAGONALS, YELLOW, 30’ C-C (TYP.) BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1104+30.00 ONE-WAY AMBER MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP) ONE-WAY CRYSTAL MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP) TWO-WAY AMBER MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP.) + 4 3 . 1 3 B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 0 6 + 2 0 . 7 0 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 2 + 0 0 . 0 0 TWO-WAY AMBER MARKER, 80’ C-C (TYP.) 4" NO PASSING ZONE LINE YELLOW AN EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS REQUIRED LEADING FROM THE BEGINNING OF IMPROVEMENTS (STA. 106+20.70) HEADING WEST AND TYING INTO THE EXISTING "NO PASSING LINE". AN EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS ALSO REQUIRED BETWEEN (STA. 122+00) AND (STA. 128+46). DUE TO TYING INTO A PREVIOUS "NO PASSING ZONE" EXISTING SIGNS WILL BE UTILIZED. 12 PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN IL ROUTE 126 AND PENMAN ROAD 105+00 110+00 115+00 120+00 1 1 0 0 + 0 0 1 1 0 5 + 0 0 12121212 1212 12" CMP 12" CM P R3 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p m 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 0 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 12 ’ 12 ’ ‘4" EDGE LINE, WHITE TWO-WAY AMBER MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP.) TWO-WAY AMBER MARKER, 80’ C-C (TYP.) M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 2 + 0 0 . 0 0 M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 NOTE: AN EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS REQUIRED BETWEEN (STA. 122+00) AND (STA. 128+46). 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 13 125+00 12 1212" C M P S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p m 0 2 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 2 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 4 2 + 4 2 . 0 0 R=200’ ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.96 ~ ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 A S H L E Y R O A D IL ROUTE 126 4’ EDGE LINE, WHITE 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE 8" SKIP DASH, WHITE 2’ DASH - 6’ SKIP 8" LANE LINE, WHITE TURN ARROW, WHITE 15.6 SQ. FT. (TYP.) 12" DIAGONALS, YELLOW, 30’ C-C (TYP.) 8" LANE LINE, WHITE 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 12" DIAGONALS, YELLOW 50’ C-C (TYP.) 8" LANE LINE, WHITE 8" SKIP DASH, WHITE 2’ SKIP - 6’ DASH 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 24" STOP BAR, WHITE 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE R1-1-3030 * + 6 2 + 8 5 R=2’ + 2 8 . 3 6 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ + 4 6 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ + 0 2 + 4 2 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ 24" STOP BAR, WHITE STA. 206+28.7 +10 +35 12’12’ 6’ 10’12’ 1 2 ’ 8" LANE LINE, WHITE 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 12" DIAGONALS, WHITE 30’ C-C (TYP.) BEGIN IM P R O V M E N T S STA. 202 + 8 5 . 0 0 TWO-WAY AMBER MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP.) ONE-WAY AMBER MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP) ONE-WAY CRYSTAL MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP) 12 ’ 12 ’ M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 14 PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN IL ROUTE 126 AND ASHLEY ROAD NOTE: AN EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS REQUIRED BETWEEN (STA. 122+00) AND (STA. 128+46). A WESTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS REQUIRED TO EXTEND 500’ BEYOND THE END OF IMPROVMENTS (STA. 142+42) TO (STA 147+42). AN EASTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS ALSO REQUIRED TO EXTEND AND TIE INTO THE END OF THE EXISTING EASTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE". 130+00 135+00 140+00 2 0 0 + 0 0 2 0 5 + 0 0 1515 15" CMP S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p m 0 3 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 3 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ i n t 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 4 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 135+00 2 0 5 + 0 0 115+00 PT STA. 1104+20.15 1 1 0 5 + 0 0 R3 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 ~ PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1104+30.00 3 IL ROUTE 126 INTERSECTION PAVEMENT ELEVATION PLAN IL ROUTE 126 3 STA. 1104+35.24, 18.01’ RT ELEV. = 716.72 STA. 114+36.87, 25.14’ RT ELEV. = 716.92 STA. 1104+78.92, 17.99’ RT ELEV. = 716.12 STA. 204+95.44, 18.00’ RT ELEV. = 715.06 STA. 134+96.78, 31.79’ RT ELEV. = 718.11 STA. 205+55.76, 18.0’ RT ELEV. = 716.29 PENMAN ROAD ASHLEY ROAD 2% 2% 716.82716.82 716.90 716.95 717.01 716.68 716.46 716.24 717.03 716.73 716.43 716.13STA. 112+91.78 ELEV. = 717.16 STA. 1104+88.22, 25.15’ RT ELEV. = 716.14 717.49 717.30 2% 1. 0 % 1.5 % 718.80 718.72 717.41 718.34 717.58 716.82 +75 717.65 +50 717.79 +25 717.88 +00 717.97 +00 719.63 +25 719.22 +50 718.80 +75 720.04 +50 720.45 +75 718.44 2 % +25 715.75 +00 715.19 2 %2 % +25 717.06 +50 717.10 +75 717.15 +00 717.19 +25 717.25 +50 717.31 +75 717.37 2 % +00 715.55 +50 716.60 +75 717.07 +00 717.54 +25 718.11 +25 716.80 +00 716.48 +75 716.48 +50 716.79 +50 716.43 717.18 +79 716.03 STA. 133+35.58 ELEV. = 717.23 STA. 135+69.76 ELEV. = 720.82 2% STA. 114+89.84 ELEV. = 716.97 2 % +25 716.11 717.46 717.21 716.96 716.72 716.47 716.22 2% 716.14 716.49 2% 720.02 719.62 720.42+00 719.40 719.10 +50 716.15 715.88 715.54 715.19 +50 717.53 NOTE: ALL RADII GRADES ARE AT 20 FOOT INCREMENTS STARTING AT THE P.C. OF IL ROUTE 126 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.96 ~ ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 STA. 206+06.22, 37.79’ RT ELEV. = 716.82 15 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 0 6 + 2 0 . 6 5 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 2 2 + 0 0 . 0 0 PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW PR ROW P T S T A . 1 1 7 + 6 3 . 6 7 > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 > PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1104.30.00 P E N M A N R O A D IL ROUTE 126 TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS STA. 111+12.37, 29.55’ LT STA. 116+13.15, 34.58’ LT STA. 109+73.10, 43.09’ RT EROSION CONTROL PLANS INLET AND PIPE PROTECTION STA. 113+19.68, 50.19’ RT STA. 121+28.54, 32.00’ RT 16 105+00 110+00 115+00 120+00 125+00 1 1 0 0 + 0 0 1 1 0 5 + 0 0 105+00 110+00 115+00 120+00 125+0 0 1 1 0 0 + 0 0 1 1 0 5 + 0 0 12121212 1212 12" CMP BOX CULVERT:5’ (W) X 2’ (H)INV: 711.96 12" CM P BOX CULVERT:5’ (W) X 2’ (H)INV: 712.01 R3 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ e r o 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 6 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 4 2 + 4 2 . 0 0 > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.96 > ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 A S H L E Y R O A D IL ROUTE 126 BEGIN IM P R O V M E N T S STA. 202 + 8 5 . 0 0 TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS STA. 128+46.00, 39.08’ LT STA. 130+38.69, 28.85’ LT STA. 137+00.00, 31.50’ LT STA. 142+42.00, 25.29’ LT STA. 128+46.00, 34.57’ RT STA. 142+42.00, 27.19’ RT EROSION CONTROL PLANS 17 130+00 135+00 140+00 2 0 0 + 0 0 2 0 5 + 0 0 130+00 135+00 140+00 2 0 0 + 0 0 2 0 5 + 0 0 1515 BOX CUL V E R T : 3’ (W) X 2 ’ ( H ) INV: 712. 4 0 BOX CULV E R T : 3’ (W) X 2 ’ ( H ) INV: 712. 5 8 15" CMP S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ e r o 0 2 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 7 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 EDGE OF PAVEMENT E E D D C C B B A A FLOW LINE 5.4 m (18’) 1.8 m (6’)1.8 m (6’)1.8 m (6’) NO. 6 TIE BARS @ 24" CENTERS 1.2 m (4’) R 80 ^ S H O U L D E R S L O P E EDGE OF SHOULDER EDGE OF OUTLET TO CONFORM TO THE SLOPE OF SHOULDER WELDED WIRE FABRIC WEIGHING NOT LESS THAN 2.83 kg/sq m (58 LBS./100 SQ. FT.) TO BEGIN HERE F FG G A-A * *DIMENSIONS OF THE CURB & GUTTER AT SECTION A-A ARE SHOWN ON STATE STANDARD 606001-02. FOR DETAILS OF OUTLET FOR CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE B-15.60 (B-6.24) SEE STATE STANDARD 606006. B-B 100 (4) 65 R (2-1/2) 12 5 R (4 - 5 / 8 ) 6 5 ( 2 - 1 / 2 ) 125 (5) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 270 (10-5/8) 340 (13-1/2) C-C 125 R (5)75 R (3) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 95 R (3-3/4)250 R (9-3/8) 1 1 0 ( 4 - 3 / 8 ) 290 (11-1/2) WELDED WIRE FABRIC D-D 75 (3) 1 5 5 ( 6 - 1 / 4 ) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 35 (1-3/8) 310 R (12 - 3 / 8 ) 1.2 m (3’ 11-3/8")330 (13-1/8) E-E 30 (1-1/8) 75 R (3) 150 (6) 4 4 5 R (1 7 - 3 / 4 ) 675 (27) 340 (13-1/2) 1.54 m (5’ 1-1/2") 75 R (3) 75 (3) 5 0 ( 2 ) 1 2 5 ( 5 ) 75 R (3) 150 (6)675 (27) 75 (3) 75 R (3) 4 4 5 R (1 7 - 3 / 4 ) 340 (13-1/2)1 2 5 ( 5 ) F-F 150 R (6) 75 (3)150 (6) 4 5 0 ( 1 8 ) G-G GENERAL NOTES ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS (INCHES) UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. GUTTER OUTLET SHALL BE TIED TO THE PAVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAILS FOR LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT SHOWN ON STATE STANDARD 420001. TIE BARS SHALL BE NO. 20 (NO. 6) AT 600 (24) CENTERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. IF THE AVERAGE GRADE OF PAVEMENT FOR THE DISTANCE FROM SECTION A-A TO D-D EXCEEDS 2% THIS DISTANCE SHALL BE INCREASED 1.8 m (6’) FOR EACH 1% INCREASE IN GRADE. OUTLET FOR CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER BARRIER CURB MOUNTABLE CURB CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL 6" for Type M3.06 12" for Type M3.12 18" for Type M3.18 24" for Type M3.24 when sub-base is omitted Slope same as sub-base or 3/ 4 " p e r f t . 3"3" 3 " T PAVEMENT #4 REBAR (TYP.) R=3" 3 " T Y P . 9 " f o r B 9 . 1 2 , B 9 . 1 8 , B 9 . 2 4 6 " f o r B 6 . 1 2 , B 6 . 1 8 , B 6 . 2 4 12" for Type B6.12 & B9.12 18" for Type B6.18 & B9.18 24" for Type B6.24 & B9.24 1"6" Slope same as sub-base or 3/ 4 " p e r f t . when sub-base is omitted T Slope 6% #4 REBAR (TYP.) R=1" 3 " T Y P . PAVEMENT Tie bars shall be placed on 9’ centers (minimum 2 per joint). steel tie bars 30’ long conforming to AASHTO M-31 of M-53. All construction joints shall be provided with 1/2" dia. deformed cap having a pinched stop that will provide 1" of expansion. Standard Specifications. The dowel bar shall be fitted with a coated smooth dowel bar conforming to Article 1006.11(b) of the All expansion joints shall be provided with a 1 1/4 dia. X 18" 15 feet. be placed between expansion joints at distances not to exceed curves and at construction joints. Contraction joints shall shall be installed at points of curvature for short radius conforming to the cross section of the curb and gutter pavement, a 1" thick preformed expansion joint filler, When curb and gutter is constructed adjacent to flexible P.C.C. pavement or base course. the curb and gutter in prolongation with joints in adjacent Contraction joints and expansion joints shall be installed in Standard Specifications, joints shall be constructed as follows. JOINTS - In addition to the requirements of Article 606.06 of the curb shall be made at the rate of 3" per foot of length or flatter. TRANSITIONS - The transition from full height curb to depressed the continuous portion of concrete gutter in front of the casting. rebars (L = 12" + casting length + 12") shall be incorporated in casing is less than the width of the curb and gutter, 2 - No. 4 each side of the metal casing. When the width of the metal shall be installed in the curb and gutter a distance of 10 ft. from filler, conforming to the cross sections of the curb and gutter, be incorporated in the curb and gutter, a 1" thick preformed joint DRAINAGE OPENINGS - At all locations where metal casings are to of the gutter flag shall be 9". Also, tie bars shall be omitted. is constructed adjacent to flexible pavement, the vertical thickness THICKNESS - T - Thickness of pavement. When curb & gutter 12" 12" 665 (2’ 2-1/8") 3’24’3’ EARTH SHLD.EARTH SHLD. R.O.W. LINE OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS V A R I E S 15’ 1 5 ’ PROPOSED AGGREGATE SHOULDER EDGE OF BITUMINOUS SHOULDER A A BITUMINOUS SHOULDER (SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR PROFILE) MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION R . O . W . L I N E O R A S S H O W N O N P L A N S EXISTING ENTRANCE ENTRANCE SURFACE MATERIAL: 6" AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE; TYPE B FIELD ENTRANCE DETAIL ENTRANCE SURFACE MATERIAL: 6" AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE; TYPE B MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS * TIE BAR * TIE BAR * Tie bar not required when adjacent to flexible pavement. 18 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ d e t 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 9 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " E N D 780-1 TYPICAL APPLICATION @ LEFT TURN LANES 2’ TYP. 8 " WHITE 6’ TYP. 780-5 2’ TYP. WHITE4 " 6’ TYP. 780-6 780-7 10’30’10’ 500’ 8 " CL NO PASSING ZONE LINE 4" 4" 8" 4" 4" 6" 10’30’1"10’ (SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS) 780-8 E.O.P. E.O.P. EDGE LINE - WHITE EDGE LINE - WHITE CENTERLINE & NO PASSING ZONE LINES - YELLOW PAVEMENT MARKING 19 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ d e t 0 2 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 5 1 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 N.T.S. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 3" WIDTH H E I G H T EXTENSION COLLAR CLASS SI CONCRETE 6 " 6 " EXIST. HEADWALL EXIST. BOX CULVERT U EXISTING CULVERT SIZE EXTENSION COLLAR HEIGHT IN.IN.IN.IN. REINFORCEMENT BARS CU. YD.POUND EACH ’X’’Y’ U-BAR ’X’ ’ Y ’ WIDTH 12" BELOW EXISTING SHOULDER LINE IF REQUIRED. U-BAR #4 U-BAR #4 U-BAR LOCATION QUANTITIES ARE FOR ONE SIDE ONLY PROP. PRECAST CONC. BOX CULV. EXT. EXPANSION BOLTS SHALL CONSIST OF SELF DRILLING EXPANSION SHIELDS OF 9" INTO NEW CONCRETE. BOLTS SHALL BE DRILLED IN THE CENTER OF THE EXISTING BOX CULVERT BARREL WALLS. MINIMUM CERTIFIED PROOF LOAD = 4,080 LBS. PRECAST CULVERT EXTENSION 540-5 FT. x FT.FT. x FT. REMOVE EXISTING HEADWALL TO A DEPTH |4" COLLAR DETAIL (PRECAST BOX CULVERT EXTENSION OF BOX CULVERT) CONC. COLLAR 3/4 " EXPANSION BOLTS @ 12" CTS. AND 3/4 " DIA. HOOKED BOLTS. HOOKED BOLTS SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM 3/4 " DIA. EXPANSION BOLTS 540-6 PRECAST END SECTION VAR. PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT EXISTING R.C. BOX CULVERT 1’-0" 2 @ #5 BARS (2" CLEARANCE) 1.) 2.) GENERAL NOTES A A PLAN VIEW CONCRETE REMOVAL LIMITS LEGEND 2 @ #5 BARS (2" CLEARANCE) EXISTING R.C. BOX CULVERT SECTION A-A 6" CLASS SI CONCRETE COLLAR TOP OF HEADWALL TO BE REMOVED 4" MIN. BELOW FINISHED GRADE COLLAR DETAIL (PRECAST BOX CULVERT EXTENSION OF BOX CULVERT) CLASS SI CONCRETE SHALL BE USED THROUGHOUT. THE INSIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE CLASS SI CONCRETE COLLAR SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE NEW PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT. WID. H T . U-BAR ’ Y ’ ’X’ IN.IN. REINFORCEMENT BARS CU. YD.POUND ’X’’Y’ U-BAR LOCATION FT. x FT. EXISTING CULVERT SIZE IN. PRECAST CULV. EXTENSION CONC. COLLAR EACH 3/4 " DIA. EXPANSION BOLTS EXPANSION BOLTS, 3/4 " (SEE GENERAL NOTE #2) EXPANSION BOLTS SHALL CONSIST OF SELF DRILLING EXPANSION SHIELDS AND 3/4 " HOOKED BOLTS. HOOKED BOLTS SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 9" INTO NEW CONCRETE. BOLTS SHALL BE PLACED IN EACH CORNER AND AT 18" MAXIMUM CENTERS. MINIMUM CERTIFIED PROOF LOADING = 4,080 LBS. 20 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ d e t 0 3 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 5 2 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 N.T.S. A A TRAFFIC 10’10’ 1’ 3/4"/FT. EXISTING SHOULDER SECTION A-A MAILBOX TURNOUT DETAILS SHOULDER LINE **** ** 406-1 TRAFFIC LANE EDGE OF PAVEMENT * * MAILBOX 2" BIT. SURF. ** PROP. RESURFACING AGG. BSE. CSE. TY. A AS REQUIRED (6" MIN. OVER EARTH SHLD.) SEE STANDARD 406201 FURNISHED EXCAVATION AS REQUIRED MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS SAW CUT (INCIDENTAL) REMOVE BY UNIFORM CUT (REMOVAL INCIDENTAL TO MILLING OPERATIONS) EXISTING SURFACEDIRECTION OF BIT. SURF. REMOVAL ROUNDED EDGE FROM MILLING OPERATIONS NOTE:WHEN MILLING OPERATIONS PRODUCE A ROUNDED EDGE, THEN A SAW CUT SHALL BE USED TO MANUFACTURE A PERPENDICULAR EDGE AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE THE SOLE JUDGE CONCERNING THE USE OF THIS DETAIL BITUMINOUS DETAIL AT BUTT JOINTS BIT. SURFACE REMOVAL (COLD MILLING) 406-8 SIDE ROADS ENTRANCES SECTION A-A DETAILS AT ENTRANCES & SIDE ROADS PRIVATE & COMMERCIAL EDGE OF AGG. SHOULDER EDGE OF PAV’T OR BIT. SHOULDER 406-2 10’ A A 1 0 ’ EDGE OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT OR BIT. SHLD. BITUMINOUS SURFACESEE DETAIL A SEE DETAIL A PROP. RESURF. DETAIL A R A D I U S R E T U R N 30’ SEE SCHED./PLAN (DO NOT RESURFACE FIELD ENTRANCES) PLAN AT PRIVATE & COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES EDGE OF BIT. 4’ (TYPICAL ENT.) 20’ (TYPICAL S.R.) 1 1/2 " MATCH EXIST. BIT. FLARE OR USE 1:1 FLARE FOR NEW BIT. OVER EXIST. AGG. THE COST OF REMOVAL AT EXISTING BIT. OR P.C.C. LOCATIONS SHALL BE PAID FOR PER SQ. YD. BY THE APPROPRIATE PAY ITEM. REMOVAL AT EXISTING AGG. LOCATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE BITUMINOUS. A-3 LOCATIONS SHALL BE FEATHER TAPERED. 21 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ d e t 0 4 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 5 4 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 1 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 1 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 1 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 3 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 1 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 1 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 1 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 1 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 0 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 0 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 0 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 3 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 1 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 0 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 0 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 4 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 0 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 0 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 3 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 0 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 5 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T NO R T H H A L F O F T H E N O R T H E A S T QU A R T E R S E C T I O N 1 5 KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 5 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T NO R T H H A L F O F T H E N O R T H E A S T QU A R T E R S E C T I O N 1 5 KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 3 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 1 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 5 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T NO R T H H A L F O F T H E N O R T H E A S T QU A R T E R S E C T I O N 1 5 KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N Petitioner’s Request & Background: In April 2005, the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision (fka Highlands at Ashley Pointe), located in the southwest quadrant of IL Route 126 and Ashley Road, was granted annexation agreement approval via Ord. 2005-30 to construct a total of 345 single-family residential dwelling units on approximately 190 acres of land in two (2) phases to be platted as Unit 1 and Unit 2 within the R-2 One-Family Residence District. While both Units 1 and 2 were given Final Plat approval (Res. 2005-78 and Res. 2006-82, respectively), only Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision was recorded. Currently, four (4) single family homes in Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision have been constructed. Since that time, the subdivision’s original developer lost the property in foreclosure and ownership reverted back to Homestar Bank in 2012. In March of 2013, the Petitioners, John and Michelle Stewart, repurchased the entire property, which originally belonged to their family, for the purpose of revamping the land plan to replace some of the single-family lots in a portion of the development with a new private Christian high school focusing on agriculture and farming technologies. Although the current R-2 One-Family Residence District zoning identifies schools as a permitted use, the existing annexation agreement requires approval by the City Council to be amended in order to change the land use plan as proposed. Proposed Revised Land Use Plan The overall scope of the new land plan rests on t he Petitioners’ request to resubdivide an existing 43.62-acre lot in Unit 1 (Lot 358) of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision, and a portion of Unit 2, to remove 84 lots originally platted for single-family residences to construct a new Christian high school (refer to attached reference plat). The newly resubdivided lot will then consist of approximately 32 acres of land planned for a state-of-the-art 60,000 square foot, three-level private secondary education facility, athletic fields, on-site parking and other accessory structures. Approximately 5.54 acres of land will be utilized for retention area and open space to be conveyed to the future homeowners association (HOA). Finally, the remaining 6.48 acres will be dedicated for public right-of-way as Whitekirk Lane and Mustang Way. The following comparison table details the change in density (dwelling units per acre) within this area of the development based on the existing and proposed plans: 1 As a result of the resubdivision Lot #’s 273-356 from “Prestwick of Yorkville Unit 2” were removed. # of Dwelling Lots (Units) Net Area Residential Density (du/ac.) EXISTING 345 single-family lots 31.61Ac. 10.9 du/ac. PROPOSED 261 single-family lots1 31.61 Ac. 8.3 du/ac. % Change Difference of 84 units (±24% Less) ---- Difference of 2.6 du/ac. (±24% Less) Memorandum To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: August 21, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Public Hearing for Annexation Agreement Amendment Request As anticipated, the change in overall residential density is approximately 24% less in the proposed resubdivision of the development than the existing single-family detached residential land plan. With regard to the school site, the building foot print will encompass approximately 25,200 square feet of the approximately 31.61-acre site, well below the maximum 30% lot coverage allowed in the R-2 One-Family Residence District. This revised land plan for the school will require Final Plat approval with a recommendation forth coming from the Plan Commission. The Petitioner s intend to submit a final plat for Unit 2 in the future for approval and recordation. Annexation Agreement Request Attached is a copy of the Petitioners’ draft annexation agreement for the proposed new Ashley Pointe subdivision, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Below, are comments regarding the various sections of the proposed amended agreement which should be considered carefully by the City Council: 1. Final Plat: As previously mentioned, the Plan Commission has held a public hearing on August 14, 2013 regarding the proposed new final plat for the private Christian high school with a recommendation forthcoming. Therefore, paragraph 2, subparagraph C on page 2 should be revised to reflect the most updated revised version of the HR Green final plat plan. 2. Donations and Contributions: The Petitioners are seeking to receive credit against the Transportation Fee, typically $2,000/dwelling unit, for the required intersection improvements to IL Route 126 at Penman Road, Ashley Road and IL Route 126 and Ashley Road adjacent to the property. The cost of these improveme nts are estimated to exceed $1.4 million dollars versus the approximately $536,000 that would be collected in total from the proposed new residential dwelling units in the development (268 units x $2,000). The Petitioners are seeking to have this road contribution considered satisfied. 3. Land Cash: The Petitioners are requesting to revise the school and park land cash fees or provide land dedication as required under the terms of the amended agreement and set forth in a revised fee schedule (Exhibit E). They also propose that the land/cash contribution for parks be satisfied by the developer grading and seeding of a park site previously dedicated (indicated as “City Park” on attached plans) and the installation of a bicycle/pedestrian path. Staff maintains that the proposed grading and seeding of the park site is required per the Park Development Standards and cannot be used towards satisfying the contribution requirement. Further, staff has presented this request to the Park Board for their consideration and further discussion is provided below under “Land Cash/Park Board Comments”. 4. Security Instruments: A subdivision bond has been provided to the City estimating $1.9 million which ensures all public improvements (including roadway improvements) will be completed per the Subdivision Control Ordinance. The Petitioners are also requesting that a reduction in the bond to remove the obligation of the developer for street parkway tree installation and public side-walk improvements, as this would be the responsibility of the individual builders of the lots. This is similar to previously amended annexation agreements approved by the City Council in recent years (e.g. Grande Reserve, Blackberry Woods, Autumn Creek, Bristol Bay, etc.). 5. Amendments to Ordinances: The request is to have the ordinance and fee lock revised from five (5) years of the original annexation agreement, which has since expired, to a new ten (10) year lock commencing from the date of the approved amendment. This would lock all proposed fees and current ordinances for this development until 2023. 6. Fees and Charges: The Petitioners have proposed to use the attached fee sheet (Exhibit E) for the new Ashley Pointe Subdivision. Note that most of the proposed fees are consistent with the City’s current fee schedule with the exception of the development fees which has the following variations: The municipal building fee is proposed to revert back to the fee the original annexation agreement had established, but has since expired. The Library and Bristol -Kendall Fire fees reflect a partial prepayment by the developer (collected in May 2013), where fifty percent (50%) of the Library fee for Unit 1 was paid ($26,000) and fifty percent (50%) of the B KFD fee for Unit 1 ($52,000) was paid leaving the remaining units in this phase paying $250.00 per lot and $500.00 per lot, respectively, at time of building permit. The lots in Unit 2 of Ashley Pointe will be required to pay the full amounts. The Petitioners are also requesting to pay the Weather Warning Siren Fees ($75/acre) at time of building permit, rather than in full at time of final plat as typically done. The total amount to be paid equals $14,535.00 which is roughly $1,493.89 per lot. 7. Term of the Agreement: The original 20 year term limit of the initial Annexation Agreement shall apply, meaning the agreement and any amendment hereto is set to expire in April 2025. However, in the event that a permit for construction is issued within that time, then all provisions of the amended agreement shall be enforceable. 8. Parking for High School: The proposed high school development anticipates a gradual build- up of its student body of a period of time, therefore they are requesting to “land -bank” a portion of the required parking per ordinance. Specifically, the request is to construct forty percent (40%) of the required parking and the remaining sixty percent (60%) installed at a future date. While our Off-Street Parking Regulations of the City of Yorkvi lle’s Zoning Ordinance does not provide a mechanism for land-banking or phased construction of required parking, staff is supportive of this planning tool as it benefits the developer with lessening the upfront expense of asphalting a large area which will not immediately be needed; but more importantly, it reduces the amount of impervious surface lessening the storm water runoff. 9. Site Development: The Petitioners are seeking a site development permit issued prior to final engineering approval for mass grading work, and approval of building foundation only permit upon submittal of approved plans to allow for the start of construction this calendar year. This is similar to the request granted to the Kendall Crossing development to accommodate the construction schedule for the movie theater building. 10. Park Site: The request is to have the developer install a bicycle path within the previously dedicated park site (Lot 359) at a location approved by the City. While staff recognizes the proposed bicycle path on the City park site is planned to connect to a future private trail system on the school property, it should be noted that public sidewalk is already proposed for the park site which would link up to the trail system and would be a redundancy of efforts. DEVELOPMENT FEE CURRENT PROPOSED Municipal Building $1,759.00/unit $150.00/unit Library $500.00/unit $250 (Unit 1)/ $500 (Unit 2) per unit Bristol-Kendall Fire $1,000.00/unit $500 (Unit 1)/$1,000 (Unit 2) per unit Therefore, staff recommends in place of a bicycle path on this lot, the de veloper constructs a paved area at a size and in a location of the City’s choosing, to accommodate vehicular parking. 11. School Identification Sign: A request for one (1) free standing permanent school ground mounted/monument sign to be located off-site on a lot in Unit 1 near a main intersection is understandable from a visibility perspective. The proposed sign, illustrated in the attached signage elevations, would have a maximum height of 15 feet and a sign area of 50 square feet per side, inclusive of the electronic message display panel. This is larger in area and height than what is currently permitted for electronic message display panels for comm ercial users (32 sq. feet and 8 ft. maximum). Land Use/Zoning Considerations The property is currently zoned R -2 One-Family Residence District which has the following permitted uses per Section 10-6C-1, 10-6B-1 and 10-6A-1 of the City of Yorkville Zoning Ordinance: o Single-family detached dwellings o Accessory Uses o Off-Street Parking Facilities o Schools - public, private or denominational, elementary and high schools including playgrounds, garages for school buses and athletic fields, auxiliary thereto. All of the above permitted uses are proposed by the Petitioners for the redevelopment of the site. It is staff’s opinion that the proposed school and associated accessory uses (electronic scoreboard; permanent and temporary sponsor signage; athletic field lighting; outdoor parking; concession/restroom buildings; school bus parking and garage; and street parking) are out-right permitted in the R-2 zoning district. With regards to the retail store component and equestrian/riding arena, an argument can be made that this is also an accessory use and auxiliary to the primary use of the property which is an agricultural-based school curriculum. The mock silos used to house an internal stairway, proposed to exceed the maximum 35 feet building height for non -residential buildings and structures of the R-2 District, are more of an architectural component than a land use. As far as the remaining requested accessory uses of a cell tower and wind turbine/wind mill, they are typically identified as special uses in non -residential zoning districts. However, staff does not view these proposed accessory uses/structures as incompatible with the proposed school land use. Additional details regarding the placement of the accessory uses and size/dimensions will be required. Should the City Council feel the cell tower and wind turbine/wind mill not be appropriate to include as part of the annexation agreement out-right; it can be stipulated that these accessory structures be allowed as part of the development, subject to the special use approval process. Land Cash/Park Board Comments: The Petitioners are requesting a reduction in the valuation of an improved acre of land to $25,000/acre for the purposes of calculating land-cash fees for parks and schools based upon a recent appraisal of land value in the Yorkville area. Currently, an acre of improved land per Yorkville’s Land Cash Ordinance is $101,000.00. At the time of the original annexation agreement for the property, the land cash value was locked in at $80,000.00/acre for a period of five (5) years and has since expired. According to the Land Cash Ordinance (Ord. 1996-3 as amended), the developer is entitled to petition for a reduced land-cash fee by submitting an appraisal showing the fair-market value of such improved land in the area of the developm ent, with the final determination of the “fair market value” per acre of improved land made by the City Council. As mentioned previously, this request was taken to the Park Board at their meeting held in July and a collective recommendation is provided to the City Council in the attached memorandum. It is the Park Board’s recommendation to receive $80,000/acre cash for a total of $270,400, which can be reduced through the construction of an approved parking lot. If the City Council does not approve of $80,000/acre, an alternative is to not take a cash donation at this time and allow the P ark Board to request additional land or cash value at the time of Unit 2 platting. Staff Comments: Overall, staff is generally supportive of the proposed educational land use for this area of the former Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision. Schools and parks have typically been viewed as complimentary uses within residentially zoned districts, and this pr oposed land plan fits well within the center of this previously subdivided area. While a single lot with multiple uses/structures would typically be developed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD), the Petitioners and staff agree that the accessory uses (i.e., athletic fields, outdoor parking, bus parking/garage, etc.) and auxiliary facilities (e.g. equestrian/riding area, cell tower, and wind turbine/wind mill) for the proposed private school are either permitted per the Zoning Ordinance or complimentary to the overall land plan and redevelopment of this property as a private Christian high school with an agricultural program of study. Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioners’ Application w/attachments. 2. Ordinance 2005-30 Original Annexation Agreement for the Yorkville Farms Development (Prestwick of Yorkville) 3. Proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development prepared by John F. Philipchuck, attorney for the Petitioners, latest revision received August 15, 2013. 4. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision dated last revised 08/06/13 prepared by HR Green. 5. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Exhibit illustrating the proposed removed 84 single-family lots marked “FOR REFERENCE ONLY” dated 07/2/13 prepared by HR Green. 6. Yorkville Christian School - Vicinity Plan prepared by HR Green. 7. Sign and Floor Plan Study prepared by Norris Architects, Inc. dated 6/25/13. 8. Elevations and Monument Sign Study prepared by Norris Architects, Inc. dated 6/25/13. 9. EEI Letter to the City dated July 23, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 1. 10. EEI Letter to the City dated August 14, 2013 re: Final Plat Review 11. Memorandum from Director of Parks and Recreation to City Council dated August 8, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Subdivision. 12. Appraisal Report As the City Council will recall, a public hearing was the request for Amended Annexation Agreement for the Prestwick of Yorkville development was conducted during the August 27, 2013 meeting. Since then the applicant has submitted revised plans and amended portions of the proposed amended annexation agreement to address the comments and concerns expressed during the public hearing. Annexation Agreement Request Attached is a copy of the Petitioners’ most recent draft annexation agreement for the proposed new Ashley Pointe subdivision, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Below, are comments regarding the various sections of the proposed amended agreement which should be considered carefully by the City Council: 1. Final Plat: The Plan Commission held a public hearing on August 14, 2013 regarding the proposed new final plat for the private Christian high school with a formal recommendation of approval (see attached). A subsequent submittal has been provided by the Petitioner dated August 6, 2013 and staff recommends approval subject to comments provided by EEI in a recent review letter dated September 5, 2013. 2. Park Site: The Petitioners have agreed to remove their initial request that the land/cash contribution for parks be satisfied by the developer grading and seeding of a park site previously dedicated (indicated as “City Park” on attached plans) and move forward with staff’s recommendation to construct a paved area at a size and in a location of the City’s choosing to accommodate vehicular parking and receive credit for such an improvement against the land cash contribution. 3. Fees and Charges: The Petitioners have proposed to use the attached fee sheet (Exhibit E) f or the new Ashley Pointe Subdivision. The water connection fee has been revised from $2,660 to $3,700 to reflect the current rate for a single family home. Land Use/Zoning Considerations The Petitioner has revised their request for accessory uses to include only the following which are permitted per the current R-2 One-Family Residence District zoning: o Single-family detached dwellings o Accessory Uses o Off-Street Parking Facilities o Schools - public, private or denominational, elementary and high schools including playgrounds, garages for school buses and athletic fields, auxiliary thereto. Memorandum To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: September 5, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Request for Annexation Agreement Amendment & Final Plat The Petitioner has also opted to remove the request for the previously proposed following accessory structures: o Cell telephone tower; not to exceed 120’ in height o Wind Turbine/wind mill; not to exceed 120’ in height o Athletic field lighting poles not to exceed 90’ in height o Mock silos for internal stairways adjacent to the building; not to exceed 80’ in height. o Height of the school building to be up to fifty (50) feet and the silos up to eight (80) feet. o Free standing permanent school ground mounted identification sign up to fifteen feet (15’) in height; double faced and fifty (50) square feet of signage per side, including an electronic message display panel. The Petitioner has the right to seek variances or special uses, as required by ordinance, to be allowed to install such accessory structures at a later time. Land Cash/Park Board Comments: Again, the Petitioners are requesting a reduction in the valuation of an improved acre of land to $25,000/acre for the purposes of calculating land-cash fees for parks and schools based upon a recent appraisal of land value in the Yorkville area. Per the current Land Cash Ordinance, an acre of improved land is valued at $101,000.00. However, at the time of the original annexation agreement for the property, the land cash value was locked in at $80,000.00/acre for a period of five (5) years and has since expired. Staff is now recommending land cash valuation of $58,000 per acre of improved land for land cash value for this development (refer to the attached memo from the City Administrator). Although the Land Cash Ordinance (Ord. 1996-3 as amended) permits the developer to petition for a reduced land-cash fee by submitting an appraisal showing the fair -market value of such improved land in the area of the development, with the final determination of the “fair market value” per acre of improved land made by the City Council; staff has presented this proposed reduction request before the Park Board which recommended against the $25,000/acre offer and suggested $80,000/acre or to not take a cash donation at this time and to request additional land or cash value at the time of Unit 2 platting. Engineering Comments: The City Engineer has reviewed the Final Engineering Plans, Storm Sewer Design Reports and Traffic Impact Study submitted by HR Green and prepared review comments related to such documents in a letter dated September 5, 2013 (attached). In general, there are no significant issues related to the storm sewer design or traffic study findings. The comments provided can be, and are typically, addressed at a staff level for review and approval before such permits as mass grading, stormwater management and building are issued for construction. Staff Comments: Overall, staff is supportive of the proposed educational land use for this area of the former Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision and is confident that the engineering comments, which are subject to approval of the proposed amended annexation agreement and final plat of approval, can be addressed to the satisfaction of our ordinances during the staff level review. Attachments: 1. Proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development prepared by John F. Philipchuck, attorney for the Petitioners, and further revised by City Staff on September 5, 2013. 2. EEI Letter to the City dated September 5, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 2. 3. Storm Sewer Design Report prepared by HR Green, dated August 22, 2013. 4. Traffic Impact Study prepared by KLOA, Inc. dated August 22, 2013. Petitioner’s Request & Background: In April 2005, the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision (fka Highlands at Ashley Pointe), located in the southwest quadrant of IL Route 126 and Ashley Road, was granted annexation agreement approval via Ord. 2005-30 to construct a total of 345 single-family residential dwelling units on approximately 190 acres of land in two (2) phases to be platted as Unit 1 and Unit 2 within the R-2 One-Family Residence District. While both Units 1 and 2 were given Final Plat appro val (Res. 2005-78 and Res. 2006-82, respectively), only Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision was recorded. Currently, four (4) single family homes in Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision have been constructed. Since that time, the subdivision’s original developer lost the property in foreclosure and ownership reverted back to Homestar Bank in 2012. The new proposals calls for the resubdivision of Lot 358 in Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision and removes 84 lots originally contained in a portion of Unit 2 (refer to attached reference plat). The new Final Plat of Subdivision for the Yorkville Christian School consists of ~31.61 acres of land planned for a state-of-the-art 60,000 square foot, three-level private secondary education facility, athletic fields, on-site parking and other accessory structures. Approximately 5.54 acres will be utilized for retention area and open space to be conveyed to the future homeowners association (HOA). Finally, the remaining 6.48 acres will be dedicated for public right-of-way as Whitekirk Lane and Mustang Way. Plan Commission Action The Plan Commission reviewed the requested rezoning at a public hearing held on August 14, 2013 and made the following favorable action on the motion below: In consideration of the proposed Final Plat of Subdivision for the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision, the Plan Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request for Final Plat approval, as presented by the Petitioner in a plan prepared by HR Green date last revised August 6, 2013, subject to review comments prepared by the City’s Engineering Consultant, EEI, in a letter dated July 23, 2013 as stated in a staff recommendation provided in a memorandum dated August 8, 2013 and further subject to City Council approval of the amended annexation agreement allowing a school and accessory structures as a permitted land use in the P restwick of Yorkville subdivision {insert any additional conditions of the Plan Commission}… Action Item: Lindblom-aye; Weaver- aye; Prochaska-aye, Jones-aye, Baker-aye 5 ayes; 0 nays Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner’s Application w/attachments. 2. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision dated last revised 08/06/13 prepared by HR Green. 3. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Exhibit illustrating the proposed removed 84 single-family lots marked “FOR REFERENCE ONLY” dated 07/2/13 prepared by HR Green. Memorandum To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: September 5, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Final Plat Approval 4. Yorkville Christian School - Vicinity Plan prepared by HR Green. 5. EEI Letter to the City dated July 23, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 1. Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Mayor (cont’d) #1 Tracking Number CC 2013-69 Approval of a Settlement Agreement City Council – October 8, 2013 Bart Olson Administration Name Department