The URL can be used to link to this page

City Council Packet 2013 09-24-13 (cancelled) AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 24, 2013 Call to Order: Pledge of Allegiance: Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV Carlo Colosimo Jackie Milschewski Chris Funkhouser Rose Ann Spears Ken Koch Larry Kot Joel Frieders Diane Teeling Establishment of Quorum: Amendments to Agenda: Presentations: Public Hearings: Citizen Comments on Agenda Items: Consent Agenda: 1. PW 2013-39 Water Department Reports for May, June, & July 2013 2. PW 2013-40 Safe Routes to School Authorization of Contract Changes – Authorization 1 – approve decrease in the amount of $24,508.70 and authorize City Administrator to execute 3. PW 2013-41 River Road Bridge Authorizations of Contract Changes a. Authorization 10 – approve increase in the amount of $4,500.00 and authorize City Administrator to execute b. Authorization 11 – approve increase in the amount of $39,712.61 and authorize City Administrator to execute 4. PW 2013-42 RFP for Removal of Ash Trees – authorize staff to issue a request for proposals for the removal of certain ash trees throughout the City Minutes for Approval: 1. CC 2013-63 Minutes of the City Council – August 27, 2013 Bills for Payment (Informational): $893,406.50 Mayor’s Report: 1. CC 2013-64 Proclamation for Constitution Week 2. CC 2013-65 Resolution Supporting the “Countywide Pay as We Grow Plan” Grant Application to Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 City Council Agenda September 24, 2013 Page 2 Public Works Committee Report: 1. PW 2013-43 Caledonia – Letter of Credit Call Economic Development Committee Report: Public Safety Committee Report: Administration Committee Report: 1. ADM 2013-51 RFP for Employee Benefits Consulting Services Park Board: Plan Commission: 1. PC 2013-07 – Grande Reserve Amendment to the Amended Annexation and PUD Agreement a. Ordinance Approving Second Amendment to the Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (Grande Reserve Subdivision) 2. PC 2013-12 and PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School a. Ordinance Approving the First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement b. Ordinance Approving the Resubdivision of Lot 358 of the Prestwick Unit 1 Final Plat Zoning Board of Appeals: City Council Report: City Clerk’s Report: Community and Liaison Report: Staff Report: Additional Business: Executive Session: Citizen Comments: Adjournment: COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ADMINISTRATION: October 17, 2013 – 6:00 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Spears Finance Library Vice-Chairman: Alderman Milschewski Administration Committee: Alderman Funkhouser Committee: Alderman Frieders City Council Agenda September 24, 2013 Page 3 COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES (cont’d) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: October 1, 2013 – 7:00 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Koch Community Development Plan Commission Vice-Chairman: Alderman Teeling Building Safety and Zoning Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp. Committee: Alderman Colosimo Kendall Co. Plan Commission Committee: Alderman Frieders PUBLIC SAFETY: October 3, 2013 – 6:30 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Colosimo Police Human Resource Comm. Vice-Chairman: Alderman Spears School District Committee: Alderman Kot Committee: Alderman Funkhouser PUBLIC WORKS: October 15, 2013 – 6:00 p.m. – City Hall Council Chambers Committee Departments Liaisons Chairman: Alderman Teeling Public Works Park Board Vice-Chairman: Alderman Kot Engineering YBSD Committee: Alderman Milschewski Parks and Recreation Committee: Alderman Koch UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET CITY COUNCIL Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:00 PM CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONSENT AGENDA: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2013-39 Water Department Reports for May, June, & July 2013 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2013-40 Safe Routes to School Authorization of Contract Changes – Authorization 1 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2013-41 River Road Bridge Authorizations of Contract Changes a. Authorization 10 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ b. Authorization 11 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. PW 2013-42 RFP for Removal of Ash Trees □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR APPROVAL: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2013-63 Minutes of the City Council – August 27, 2013 □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BILLS FOR PAYMENT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Bills for Payment (Informational) □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAYOR’S REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2013-64 Proclamation for Constitution Week □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. CC 2013-65 Resolution Supporting the “Countywide Pay as We Grow Plan” Grant Application to CMAP □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2013-43 Caledonia – Letter of Credit Call □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. ADM 2013-51 RFP for Employee Benefits Consulting Services □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed ________________________________________________________________________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLAN COMMISSION REPORT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PC 2013-07 Ordinance Approving Second Amendment to the Annexation & PUD Agreement for Grande Reserve Subdivision □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed _________________________________________________________________________ □ Bring back to Committee/future meeting _______________________________________________ □ Informational Item __________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PC 2013-12 & PC2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School a. Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of an Amended Annexation Agreement □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ b. Ordinance Approving a Final Plat □ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________ □ Removed _________________________________________________________________________ □ Bring back to Committee/future meeting _______________________________________________ □ Informational Item __________ □ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REPORTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number CA #1 Tracking Number PW 2013-39 Water Department Reports for May, June, & July 2013 City Council – September 24, 2013 PW 9/17/13 Moved forward to CC consent agenda. PW 2013-39 Majority Approval Monthly water reports that are submitted to the IEPA. Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number CA #2 Tracking Number PW 2013-40 Safe Routes to School Authorization of Contract Changes City Council – September 24, 2013 Consideration of Approval Authorization Approval Consideration Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department The purpose of this memo is to present Authorization 1 for the above referenced project. An authorization, as defined by IDOT, is the written approval of a contract change and the written directive to the contractor to perform said work. By this definition, it alters the contract work from that awarded under the competitive bidding process. An Authorization of Contract Changes signed by the Regional Engineer signifies completed review of and support for the change proposed. Background: The State of Illinois and Alliance Contractors, Inc. entered into an agreement for a contract value of $256,505.72 for the above referenced project. Construction began on April 15, 2013 and is complete. The construction costs are being funded by 100 percent Federal participation up to the maximum federal participation amount. The maximum federal participation amount is $280,000.00, inclusive of all change orders (authorizations) and construction engineering associated with this contract. The construction amount indicated in the Local Agency Agreement for Federal Participation was $243,490.00. Questions Presented: Should the City approve Authorization No. 1 in the amount of -$24,508.70? Discussion: Authorization No. 1 is a balancing authorization to balance all of the awarded contract values up or down to the final construction values. Authorization No. 1 has a value of -$24,508.70. The net change to date of total authorizations is -$24,508.70, which is a 9.55% decrease to the original contract value; a revised contract value to date of $231,997.02. The City’s responsibility does not change. We are projecting that there will be approximately $10-12,000 remaining after construction and construction engineering is finalized. At this point, it would be difficult to have the contractor re-mobilize (additional costs) and to complete any additional work since it would be a small amount. We are recommending approval of the Authorization. Action Required: Consideration of approval from the City Council for Authorization 1. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: August 28, 2013 Subject: Safe Routes to School – Authorization 1 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number CA #3 Tracking Number PW 2013-41 River Road Bridge Authorizations of Contract Changes City Council – September 24, 2013 Consideration of Approval Authorization Approval Consideration Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number CA #4 Tracking Number PW 2013-42 Ash Tree Removal RFP Request City Council – September 24, 2013 positive approval Requesting permission to solicit proposals to remove certain trees in the parkway. Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department United City Of Yorkville Request for Proposals Removal of Certain Ash Trees Throughout the City September 2013 2 Request for Proposals 1. The United City of Yorkville, Illinois (the “City”) is issuing this Request for Proposal (“RFP”) for the purpose of soliciting vendor proposals for the removal of certain ash trees located in the parkways throughout the City. 2. The City intends to seek the most cost-effective solution, based on the criteria contained in the RFP, for its needs. 3. One original and one copy of the proposal will be accepted until 12:00 PM, on Friday October 18, 2013. Proposals submitted must be binding for not less than ninety (90) days after the date of opening. The City will select the proposals, or combination of proposals, that, in its opinion, is in the best interest of the City. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or portions of a proposal. The City also reserves the right to waive minor technicalities in the proposal. The City not only reserves the right at the sole discretion of the City to reject any and all proposals and to waive technicalities, but also reserves the right of evaluation and the right to determine the methodology for evaluation of the proposals to determine which is the best proposal and to accept the proposal (or proposals) deemed to be in the best interest of the City, i.e., the most qualified proposal will not necessarily be the proposal with the lowest cost. Further, the City reserves the right to accept a proposal (or proposals) for any or all items separately or together. 4. All inquires shall ONLY be addressed at a meeting open to all potential bidders with Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works of the United City of Yorkville, to be held Tuesday October 15, 2013 at 9:00 AM at the United City of Yorkville City Council Chambers, 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois. 5. Proposals may also be hand delivered to the following address by the date and time specified. It is the responsibility of the bidder to deliver the proposal in accordance with these instructions contained above and/or elsewhere in the RFP. Proposals dispatched, but not received by the City by proposal closing time, will be returned, after receipt, unopened to the bidder. All proposals should be addressed to: United City of Yorkville Re: (vendor name) Proposal for removal of certain ash trees Attn: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works 800 Game Farm Rd Yorkville, IL 60560 Proposal packets are available online at www.yorkville.il.us or at the United City of Yorkville City Hall, which is located at 800 Game Farm Rd., Yorkville, Illinois. 3 6. Award of Contract. The United City of Yorkville City Council will make the final award of the proposal or contract. 7. Contract. In addition to the completed proposal, a resulting contract may be required by the City, including but not limited to, written correspondence between the City and the vendor subsequent to the proposal submission, facsimiles and product literature. All agreements between the United City of Yorkville and the vendor will be handled through our legal counsel. In addition, any legal restrictions, or provisions, enforced by the vendor or its parent company, which are not in line with the industry’s standard, should be pointed out. 8. Confidentiality of Documents. Proposals shall be unopened so as to avoid disclosure of contents to competing bidders and kept secret during the process of negotiation. However, all proposals that have been submitted shall be open for public inspection after contract award. Trade secrets and confidential information, as specified by the vendor, contained in the proposals shall not be open for public inspection. 9. Contact with City Employees. In order to ensure fair and objective evaluation, all questions related to this RFP should be addressed only to Eric Dhuse as provided in paragraph 4. Contact with any other City employee is expressly prohibited without prior consent of the persons so named herein. Vendors directly contacting other City employees will risk elimination of their proposal from further consideration. Conditions 1. Contractor will perform the described work within 60 calendar days of the award of the contract by the United City of Yorkville city council. 2. Contractor will furnish upon request the following certificates of insurance with provision that insurance policies may not be cancelled or endorsed in any way which would reduce or limit coverage within (10) days prior written notice to the United City of Yorkville. A. Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability: Workers' Compensation coverage with statutory limits and Employers' Liability limits of $1,000,000 per accident.. B. Commercial General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The general aggregate shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Minimum General Aggregate shall be no less than $2,000,000 or a project/contract specific aggregate of $1,000,000. C. Owners and Contractors Protective Liability (OCP): $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. 4 D. Businesses Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Work completed under this contract shall be subject to the approval of the United City of Yorkville. For the practical implementation of the contract, the contractor agrees to meet with the City as often as necessary to discuss any and all aspects of the contract. 4. If in the opinion of the United City of Yorkville Public Works Department, the contractor has not or is not satisfactorily performing the work covered by this specification, and within two (2) weeks (14 calendar days) of receipt of a written demand from the United City of Yorkville, for performance, has not cured any defect in performance specifically itemized in such demand, the United City of Yorkville may, at its option: • Consider all or any part of this contract breached • May hire another contractor to cure any defects in performance • or complete all work covered by this specification for the remaining term of this contract. • Any demand for performance shall be specifically delivered to Contractor by registered mail. 5. Neither the contractor nor the United City of Yorkville shall be held liable in damages caused beyond its control and without its fault or negligence including but not limited to, acts of God or the public enemy, acts of the government, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, or unusually severe weather. 6. All bidders shall furnish, with their proposal, a current copy of the Emerald Ash Borer compliance agreement with the Illinois Department of Agriculture. Criteria Removal - all ash trees shall be removed and disposed of according to the stipulations set forth by the Illinois Department of Agriculture. Any deviations will result in a breach of contract, for which the penalty will be immediate termination of the contract. Stump grinding - All stumps shall be ground to a minimum depth of 12” below ground level. All grindings are to be removed and replaced with good quality black dirt and seed and covered with straw blanket. The removal of the stump and the placing of the black dirt and seed are to be done concurrently. Healthy stand of grass - each work area must have a healthy stand of grass as determined by the Director of Public Works or his designee. The grass shall be weed free and densely populated before it will be considered healthy. 5 Utility locations - notifying J.U.L.I.E is the sole responsibility of the contractor. Traffic control - traffic control shall be provided where necessary. At least one lane of traffic must stay open at all times. No street may be closed without permission of the United City of Yorkville. Work areas - All work areas will be restored to pre working conditions when the tree is removed. All branches will be picked up, any damage to the parkway or the yard will be repaired, and the site will be left in a neat and clean condition each day. Pay out - The contractor will be paid within 30 days of completion of the job. A 10% retainer will be held until such time that a healthy stand of grass is established on all work areas. 6 CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATIONS The undersigned; A. Certifies that it is not barred from bidding or contracting with the City as a result of a violation of either Paragraph 33E-3 or 33E-4 of Act 5, Chapter 720 of the Illinois Complied Statutes regarding criminal interference with public contracting, and B. Swears under oath that it is not delinquent in the payment of any tax administered by the Illinois Department of Revenue as required by Chapter 65, Act 5, paragraph 11-42.1 of the Illinois Complied Statutes, and C. States that is has a written sexual harassment policy as required by the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/2-105(A) (4) a copy of which shall be provided to the City upon request, and D. Agrees to comply with the requirements of the Illinois Human Rights Act regarding Equal Employment Opportunities as required by Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/2- 105) D. Agrees to comply with the civil rights standards set forth in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as mandated in Executive Order No. 11246, U.S.C.A. Section 2000e n.114 (September 24, 1965) All work under this contract shall be executed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and City laws, ordinances, rules and regulations which may in any manner affect the performance of this contract. Dated: ___________________________ Contractor: ___________________________________ By: ________________________________________ Title: ________________________________________ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes #1 Tracking Number CC 2013-63 Minutes of the City Council – August 27, 2013 City Council – September 24, 2013 Majority Approval Approval of Minutes Beth Warren City Clerk Name Department MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 27, 2013 Mayor Golinski called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Warren called the roll. Ward I Koch Present Colosimo Present Ward II Milschewski Present Kot Present Ward III Frieders Present Funkhouser Present Ward IV Spears Absent Teeling Present Also present: City Clerk Warren, Attorney Binninger, City Administrator Olson, Police Chief Hart, Deputy Chief of Police Hilt, Public Works Director Dhuse, Finance Director Fredrickson, EEI Engineer Sanderson, Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble, Director of Park and Recreation Schraw, Administrative Intern Weckbach QUORUM A quorum was established. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Mayor Golinski tabled item # 1 under Public Works Kendall Marketplace Infrastructure (PW 2013-36), item # 1 under Economic Development Committee Ordinance Approving a Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area (Imperial Investments, LLC) (EDC 2013-28), and item # 2 under Plan Commission Grande Reserve Amendment to the Amended Annexation and PUD Agreement (PC 2013-07). Alderman Koch made a motion to approve the agenda as amended; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Amendment approved unanimously by a viva voce vote. PRESENTATIONS Government Transparency Award presented to the City by the Illinois Policy Institute Mayor Golinski called Brian Costin up to the front. Mr. Costin presented the City with a Government Transparency Award. Mr. Costin told the Council about the Illinois Policy Institute and the award. Recognition of Lions Club for their Donation of a Shelter at Bridge Park Mayor Golinski called Don Hirsch from the Lions Club up and presented a plaque to him in recognition of the Lions Club donation of a shelter at Bridge Park. Don Hirsch gave a little background on the Lions Club. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PC 2013-09 – Mr. Peter Occhipinti, Petitioner and Owner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting annexation by an annexation agreement for an approximately 0.87 acre parcel of land located in unincorporated Kendall County. The subject property is generally located east of Illinois Route 47, immediately south of McHugh Road, and just west of Farmstead Drive in Kendall County, Illinois. It is proposed that the subject property be zoned within the City’s R-4 General Residence District for a future multifamily residence development. 2. PC 2013-12 – An amendment to that certain Annexation Agreement (Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision) dated April 26, 2005 by and among Yorkville Farms Development, LLC. (Owner/Developer), an Illinois Limited Liability Corporation, and the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, for the purpose of amending the agreement regarding a re-subdivision of Lot 358 for a private high school with accessory uses, recalculation of impact fees, revised school and park land-cash fees, extension of fee and ordinance locks and other miscellaneous site development improvements related to the proposed school land use. The proposed accessory uses and improvements may include a retail school store; an equestrian arena and stable; cellular telephone tower; wind turbine; electronic scoreboard, public address system, lighting and concession/restrooms for athletic fields; outdoor storage of farm equipment, grain bins and greenhouses; street parking along Mustang Way and delayed construction of on-site parking; DRAFT The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – August 27, 2013 – Page 2 of 4 school bus parking and garage; an off-premise electronic school identification sign; and building height exceptions. 3. Countryside TIF Bond Refinancing Please, see attached report of proceedings by the Court Reporter for the public hearing. CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS Kathy Neddo, a citizen, thanked the Council for doing a great job over the past year. Jim Motto, citizen, is one of the four houses in the subdivision that will be affected by the new high school. He stated the Stewarts have been very forth coming with information. He discussed the dangers of Route 126. He is concerned about his neighborhood's covenants and the property value of his home. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors (KKCOM) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Project Application – authorize staff to submit 2013 Call for Projects application for Mill Street LAFO project funding (PW 2013-37) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye, Milschewski-aye, Frieders-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Koch-aye, Teeling-aye, Kot-aye MINUTES FOR APPROVAL 1. Minutes of the City Council – July 23, 2013 (CC 2013-59) 2. Minutes of the City Council – August 13, 2013 (CC 2013-60) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the minutes of the regular City Council meeting for July 23, 2013 and August 13, 2013 as presented. So moved by Alderman Milschewski; seconded by Alderman Frieders. Amendment approved unanimously by a viva voce vote. BILLS FOR PAYMENT Mayor Golinski stated that the bills were $982,887.38. REPORTS MAYOR’S REPORT Ordinance 2013-51 Approving the Second Amendment to the Planned Unit Development Agreement (Windett Ridge Subdivision) (CC 2013-61) Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving the second amendment to the planned unit development agreement (Windett Ridge Subdivision) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Funkhouser; seconded by Alderman Colosimo. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Frieders-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT Kendall Marketplace Infrastructure (PW 2013-36) Mayor Golinski stated this was tabled. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT Ordinance Approving a Fourth Amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement for the Downtown Yorkville Redevelopment Project Area (Imperial Investments, LLC) (EDC 2013-28) Mayor Golinski stated this was tabled. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT No report. ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT No report. PARK BOARD The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – August 27, 2013 – Page 3 of 4 No report. PLAN COMMISSION Priority Health Annexation and Zoning (PC 2013-04 and PC 2013-05) Ordinance 2013-52 Approving an Annexation Agreement Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving an annexation agreement (Priority Health and Body Makeover, Inc.) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye, Frieders-aye, Colosimo-aye Ordinance 2013-53 Annexing Certain Territory to the United City of Yorkville Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance annexing certain territory (Priority Health and Body Makeover, Inc.) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Frieders. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Kot-aye, Frieders-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye Ordinance 2013-54 Approving the Zoning into the B-2 General Business District for the Property Located on the West Side of Route 47 Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving zoning into the B-2 general business district for the property located on the west side of Route 47 (Priority Health and Body Makeover, Inc.) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Frieders. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Frieders-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye Grande Reserve Amendment to the Amended Annexation and PUD Agreement (PC 2013-07) Mayor Golinski stated this was tabled. Midland States Bank (PC 2013-08) Ordinance 2013-55 Approving a Special Use Permit for a Bank with Drive-Through Facilities Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving a special use for a bank with a drive-through facility (Midland States Bank - 38 West Countryside Parkway) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Milchewski; seconded by Alderman Funkhouser. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-0 Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye, Frieders-aye ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS No report. CITY COUNCIL REPORT No report. CITY CLERK’S REPORT No report. CITY TREASURER’S REPORT No report. COMMUNITY & LIAISON REPORT Aurora Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Alderman Funkhouser reported on the AACVB Board Meeting. School Board The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – August 27, 2013 – Page 4 of 4 Alderman Funkhouser reported on the school board meeting. Middle school curriculum and scheduling issues were discussed, along with the high school expansion. Alderman Funkhouser relayed a compliment from the school to Public Works Director Dhuse and his staff. Push for the Path Alderman Teeling reported that the Push for the Path golf outing is coming up on September 28, 2013. STAFF REPORT Hometown Days Director of Park and Recreation Schraw and Mayor Golinski reported on Hometown Days and gave a brief overview of the events. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS Farmers Market Alderman Milschewski discussed the turnout for the Saturday morning farmer's market. Director of Park and Recreation Schraw will look into this issue. Administrator Olson said the EDC had directed the Park Board to come up with recommendations to improve the farmer's market. Senior Services Fashion Show Mayor Golinski stated that he was going to be a fashion model for the Senior Services Fashion Show on Sunday September 15, 2013. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to go into Executive Session for the purpose of 1. For the discussion of minutes of meetings lawfully closed under the Open Meetings Act, whether for purposes of approval by the body of the minutes or semi-annual review of the minutes. There was no motion or second. CITIZEN COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Golinski announced meeting adjourned. Meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Minutes submitted by: Beth Warren, City Clerk, City of Yorkville, Illinois Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Bills for Payment Tracking Number Bills for Payment (Informational): $893,406.50 City Council – September 24, 2013 None – Informational Amy Simmons Finance Name Department DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 0 9 A A 0 0 0 0 0 3 D A N I E L V . T R A N S I E R 0 8 3 1 1 3 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - A U G . 0 7 & A U G . 2 1 A D M I N 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 H E A R I N G S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 1 0 A D V A A U T O A D V A N C E D A U T O M A T I O N & C O N T R O L S 1 3 - 1 9 1 6 0 8 / 0 2 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - I N T R U S I O N A L A R M 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 5 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 0 2 I N T E G R A T I O N S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 6 5 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 1 1 A D V A N D I S A D V A N C E D D I S P O S A L - B A T A V I A - T 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 9 5 3 9 4 3 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 H E A L T H & S A N I T A T I O N - A U G U S T 0 1 - 5 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 1 1 1 , 9 0 4 . 3 6 0 2 S E N I O R S E R V I C E * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 H E A L T H & S A N I T A T I O N - A U G U S T 0 1 - 5 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 2 8 2 , 1 5 0 . 6 5 0 4 S E R V I C E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 4 , 0 5 5 . 0 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 4 , 0 5 5 . 0 1 5 1 6 1 1 2 A M P E R A G E A M P E R A G E E L E C T R I C A L S U P P L Y I N C 0 4 7 6 0 7 8 - I N 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T W I S T L O C K 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 4 0 3 . 1 7 0 2 P H O T O C O N T R O L S , L A M P S , M I D G E T S , * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 V I N Y L T A P E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 0 3 . 1 7 * 0 4 7 6 1 9 2 - I N 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T W I S T L O C K 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 4 . 1 7 0 2 P H O T O C O N T R O L * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 4 . 1 7 * 1 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 1 2 A M P E R A G E A M P E R A G E E L E C T R I C A L S U P P L Y I N C 0 4 7 7 9 4 4 - I N 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - S O D I U M L A M P S , B A L L A S T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 4 4 4 . 8 4 0 2 K I T S , T W I S T L O C K P H O T O C O N T R O L S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 4 4 . 8 4 * 0 4 7 8 0 2 9 - I N 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - B A L L A S T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 5 6 7 4 . 5 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 4 . 5 9 * 0 4 7 8 0 3 0 - I N 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - O R A N G E W I R E N U T 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 2 4 . 4 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 4 . 4 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 6 1 . 2 5 5 1 6 1 1 3 A R A M A R K A R A M A R K U N I F O R M S E R V I C E S 6 1 0 - 8 1 8 2 6 6 4 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - U N I F O R M S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 0 2 W A T E R O P - U N I F O R M S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 0 3 S E W E R O P - U N I F O R M S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 0 . 5 0 * 6 1 0 - 8 1 9 1 9 0 0 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - U N I F O R M S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 4 6 . 5 4 0 2 W A T E R O P - U N I F O R M S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 0 3 S E W E R O P - U N I F O R M S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 2 3 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 3 . 5 4 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 6 4 . 0 4 5 1 6 1 1 4 A R R O L A B A R R O L A B O R A T O R Y , I N C . 4 6 0 9 0 0 8 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C O L I F O R M 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 9 7 2 . 6 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 2 . 6 0 * 4 6 1 5 0 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C O L I F O R M 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 9 1 4 5 . 2 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 4 5 . 2 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 1 7 . 8 0 2 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 3 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 1 5 A T T A T & T 6 3 0 5 5 3 3 4 3 6 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 5 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - M O N T H L Y C H A R G E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 6 0 . 2 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 0 . 2 7 * 6 3 0 5 5 3 6 8 0 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 5 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - M O N T H L Y C H A R G E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 2 1 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 1 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 8 1 . 2 7 5 1 6 1 1 6 A T T L O N G A T & T L O N G D I S T A N C E 8 2 8 9 3 2 1 3 6 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A U G U S T L O N G D I S T A N C E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 . 6 1 0 2 P O L I C E - A U G U S T L O N G D I S T A N C E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 5 0 . 4 3 0 3 L I B R A R Y - A U G U S T L O N G D I S T A N C E 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 1 4 . 8 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 7 . 8 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 6 7 . 8 6 5 1 6 1 1 7 B A T T E R Y S B A T T E R Y S E R V I C E C O R P O R A T I O N 2 3 6 9 1 7 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - C O M M E R C I A L R E S C U E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 0 9 . 0 0 0 2 1 2 V B O O S T E R P A C K * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 1 8 B C B S B L U E C R O S S B L U E S H I E L D 0 9 0 6 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 5 , 9 2 4 . 8 4 0 2 A D M I N - E L E C T E D O F F I C I A L O C T O B E R 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 5 5 , 3 7 7 . 2 0 0 3 H E A L T H I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 F I N A N C E - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 , 5 3 4 . 9 4 0 5 P O L I C E - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 5 , 0 4 8 . 7 3 0 6 C O M M / D E V - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 , 4 8 4 . 7 2 0 7 S T R E E T S - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 7 , 8 8 4 . 2 5 3 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 4 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 1 8 B C B S B L U E C R O S S B L U E S H I E L D 0 9 0 6 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 8 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - R E T I R E E S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 4 0 7 , 0 4 0 . 9 5 0 9 O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 1 0 P A R K S - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 9 , 0 7 0 . 4 3 1 1 R E C R E A T I O N - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 4 , 9 7 3 . 7 8 1 2 W A T E R O P - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 7 , 4 0 8 . 3 8 1 3 S E W E R O P - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 , 9 7 5 . 2 7 1 4 L I B R A R Y - O C T O B E R H E A L T H I N S . 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 6 , 1 4 3 . 6 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 , 8 6 7 . 1 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 5 , 8 6 7 . 1 0 5 1 6 1 1 9 B U I L D E R S B U I L D E R S A S P H A L T L L C 1 0 2 8 2 0 8 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - C O L D P A T C H 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 3 9 4 6 . 2 0 0 2 H O T P A T C H 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 4 1 9 4 . 5 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 1 4 0 . 7 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 1 4 0 . 7 3 5 1 6 1 2 0 C A L L O N E U N I T E D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Y S T E M S 1 0 1 0 - 7 9 8 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 9 1 3 0 9 / 1 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A U G U S T A D M I N P H O N E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 5 4 . 4 7 0 2 C H A R G E S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A D M I N - A U G U S T C I T Y H A L L N O R T E L 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 7 7 . 5 0 0 4 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C I T Y H A L L N O R T E L 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 7 7 . 5 0 0 5 W A T E R O P - A U G . C I T Y H A L L N O R T E L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 7 7 . 4 9 0 6 P O L I C E - A U G U S T P O L I C E P H O N E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 7 3 0 . 0 0 0 7 C H A R G E S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 8 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C I T Y H A L L F I R E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 6 9 . 2 5 0 9 A D M I N - A U G U S T C I T Y H A L L F I R E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 6 9 . 2 5 1 0 L I B R A R Y - A U G U S T P H O N E C H A R G E S 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 9 1 . 8 5 1 1 W A T E R O P - A U G U S T P H O N E C H A R G E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 , 2 1 2 . 4 9 1 2 P A R K S - A U G U S T P H O N E C H A R G E S 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 4 7 . 9 1 1 3 R E C C E N T E R - C R E D I T F O R C A N C E L E D 8 0 - 8 0 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 - 2 4 4 . 9 8 4 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 5 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 2 0 C A L L O N E U N I T E D C O M M U N I C A T I O N S Y S T E M S 1 0 1 0 - 7 9 8 0 - 0 0 0 0 - 0 9 1 3 0 9 / 1 5 / 1 3 1 4 A N D T R A N S F E R E D L I N E S * * C O M M E N T * * 1 5 R E C R E A T I O N - A U G U S T P H O N E 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 9 0 . 4 8 1 6 C H A R G E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 , 2 5 3 . 2 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 , 2 5 3 . 2 1 5 1 6 1 2 1 C A M B R I A C A M B R I A S A L E S C O M P A N Y I N C . 3 4 1 2 8 0 9 / 0 9 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - P A P E R T O W E L 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 5 5 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 5 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 5 . 5 0 5 1 6 1 2 2 C A R D I S C A R R O L L D I S T R I B U T I N G 3 4 9 7 6 9 0 8 / 1 6 / 1 3 0 1 L A N D C A S H - W O O D S T A K E S 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 1 2 5 . 4 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 5 . 4 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 2 5 . 4 0 5 1 6 1 2 3 C A R G I L L C A R G I L L , I N C 2 9 0 1 2 7 9 0 2 5 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - B U L K R O C K S A L T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 8 2 , 7 0 2 . 8 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 7 0 2 . 8 5 * 2 9 0 1 2 8 9 4 2 3 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - B U L K R O C K S A L T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 8 2 , 6 7 2 . 6 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 6 7 2 . 6 8 * 2 9 0 1 2 9 1 5 9 8 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - B U L K R O C K S A L T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 8 2 , 7 5 8 . 7 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 7 5 8 . 7 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 8 , 1 3 4 . 3 2 5 1 6 1 2 4 C E N T R A L L C E N T R A L L I M E S T O N E C O M P A N Y , I N C 5 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 6 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 2 4 C E N T R A L L C E N T R A L L I M E S T O N E C O M P A N Y , I N C 1 8 8 3 7 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 L A N D C A S H - G R A V E L 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 1 , 7 8 4 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 7 8 4 . 0 0 * 1 8 8 3 8 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - G R A V E L 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 4 3 4 . 0 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 3 4 . 0 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 , 2 1 8 . 0 8 5 1 6 1 2 5 C I N T A S F P C I N T A S C O R P O R A T I O N N O . 2 F 9 4 0 0 0 5 4 9 5 9 0 8 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - A L A R M R E P A I R 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 5 6 2 7 . 1 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 2 7 . 1 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 2 7 . 1 0 5 1 6 1 2 6 C I V I C A R T C I V I C A R T W O R K S 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 C O M M / D E V - I N I T I A L P Y M T F O R 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 C O M M E N C E M E N T O F C O N T R A C T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 F O R P R O J E C T P R O P O S A L R E L A T E D * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 T O Y O R K V I L L E Z O N I N G C O D E * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 R E V I S I O N * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 2 7 C O M C A S T C O M C A S T C A B L E 0 8 2 6 1 3 - P D 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - M O N T H L Y C A B L E C H A R G E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 4 . 2 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 . 2 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 . 2 3 5 1 6 1 2 8 C O M E D C O M M O N W E A L T H E D I S O N 6 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 7 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 2 8 C O M E D C O M M O N W E A L T H E D I S O N 0 1 8 5 0 7 9 1 0 9 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - 4 2 0 F A I R H A V E N 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 9 2 . 9 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 2 . 9 4 * 0 4 3 5 1 1 3 1 1 6 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - L I G H T S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 7 1 . 4 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 1 . 4 2 * 0 9 0 3 0 4 0 0 7 7 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - L I G H T S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 2 , 1 8 8 . 3 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 1 8 8 . 3 4 * 0 9 0 8 0 1 4 0 0 4 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - W E L L S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 5 5 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 5 . 9 8 * 0 9 6 6 0 3 8 0 7 7 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 4 5 6 K E N N E D Y R O A D 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 4 5 . 8 6 0 2 P R E S S U R E V A L V E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 5 . 8 6 * 1 1 8 3 0 8 8 1 0 1 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - 1 1 0 7 P R A I R I E C R O S S I N G 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 7 6 . 6 5 0 2 L I F T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 6 . 6 5 * 1 4 0 7 1 2 5 0 4 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - F O X H I L L 7 L I F T 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 5 8 . 1 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 8 . 1 1 * 2 0 1 9 0 9 9 0 4 4 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - W E L L S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 2 . 2 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 2 . 2 6 * 2 6 6 8 0 4 7 0 0 7 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - 1 9 0 8 R A I N T R E E R D 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 1 0 7 . 2 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 7 . 2 4 * 2 9 6 1 0 1 7 0 4 3 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - L I F T S T A T I O N 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 7 6 . 0 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 6 . 0 3 * 4 0 8 5 0 8 0 0 3 3 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 1 9 9 1 C A N N O N B A L L T R A I L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 1 0 6 . 3 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 6 . 3 7 * 7 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 8 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 2 8 C O M E D C O M M O N W E A L T H E D I S O N 4 4 4 9 0 8 7 0 1 6 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - L I F T S T A T I O N S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 5 7 5 . 2 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 7 5 . 2 2 * 4 4 7 5 0 9 3 0 5 3 - 0 8 1 3 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 6 1 0 T O W E R L A N E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 1 2 5 . 5 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 5 . 5 4 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 , 6 1 1 . 9 6 5 1 6 1 2 9 C O N S T E L L C O N S T E L L A T I O N N E W E N E R G Y 0 0 1 1 2 5 8 8 9 8 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - 4 2 1 P O P L A R D R I V E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 , 2 0 1 . 5 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 , 2 0 1 . 5 3 * 0 0 1 1 3 3 1 9 4 1 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 2 9 2 1 B R I S T O L R I D G E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 , 3 1 3 . 5 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 , 3 1 3 . 5 8 * 0 0 1 1 3 4 6 0 1 4 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 6 1 0 T O W E R L A N E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 5 , 2 9 2 . 9 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 , 2 9 2 . 9 7 * 0 0 1 1 3 6 1 0 4 6 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - 1 C O U N T R Y S I D E P K W Y 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 1 3 0 . 0 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 0 . 0 7 * 0 0 1 1 3 6 9 7 5 5 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - 4 2 0 F A I R H A V E N 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 6 1 2 . 5 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 1 2 . 5 2 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 2 , 5 5 0 . 6 7 5 1 6 1 3 0 D A C B E T T E R B U S I N E S S P L A N N I N G , I N C . 1 7 7 2 5 - S E P T . H R A 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - S E P T . H R A F E E S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 9 . 0 0 0 2 A D M I N - S E P T . E L E C T E D O F F I C I A L 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 5 1 2 . 0 0 0 3 H R A F E E S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 F I N A N C E - S E P T . H R A F E E S 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 . 0 0 0 5 P O L I C E - S E P T . H R A F E E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 6 0 . 0 0 8 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 9 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 3 0 D A C B E T T E R B U S I N E S S P L A N N I N G , I N C . 1 7 7 2 5 - S E P T . H R A 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 6 C O M M / D E V - S E P T . H R A F E E S 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 9 . 0 0 0 7 S T R E E T S - S E P T . H R A F E E S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 4 . 0 0 0 8 P A R K S - S E P T . H R A F E E S 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 0 . 5 0 0 9 R E C R E A T I O N - S E P T . H R A F E E S 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 0 . 5 0 1 0 W A T E R O P - S E P T . H R A F E E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 0 . 0 0 1 1 S E W E R O P - S E P T . H R A F E E S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 4 . 0 0 1 2 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - S E P T . R E T I R E E S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 4 0 1 5 . 0 0 1 3 H R A F E E S * * C O M M E N T * * 1 4 L I B R A R Y - S E P T . H R A F E E S 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 6 2 . 0 0 * 1 7 7 2 6 - S E P T . F S A 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - S E P T . F S A F E E S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 6 . 0 0 0 2 F I N A N C E - S E P T . F S A F E E S 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 6 . 0 0 0 3 P O L I C E - S E P T . F S A F E E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 2 1 . 0 0 0 4 C O M M / D E V - S E P T . F S A F E E S 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 . 0 0 0 5 S T R E E T S - S E P T . F S A F E E S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 . 0 0 0 6 P A R K S - S E P T . F S A F E E S 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 . 5 0 0 7 R E C R E A T I O N - S E P T . F S A F E E S 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 1 . 5 0 0 8 W A T E R O P - S E P T . F S A F E E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 1 6 3 . 0 0 0 9 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - S E P T . R E T I R E E S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 4 0 3 . 0 0 1 0 F S A F E E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 8 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 1 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 3 1 D A V E A U T O D A V I D L C H E L S E N 2 1 0 5 2 0 8 / 2 5 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - S Q U A D R E P A I R 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 3 5 9 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 5 9 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 5 9 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 3 2 E E I E N G I N E E R I N G E N T E R P R I S E S , I N C . 2 & 3 R E V I S E D 0 6 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 C W C A P I T A L - S A F E R O U T E S T O 2 3 - 2 3 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 9 2 1 , 2 5 4 . 9 8 9 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 0 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 3 2 E E I E N G I N E E R I N G E N T E R P R I S E S , I N C . 2 & 3 R E V I S E D 0 6 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 2 S C H O O L * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 2 5 4 . 9 8 * 5 2 6 2 7 0 5 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A I D P A R K I N G L O T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 0 9 2 1 . 0 0 0 2 I M P R O V E M E N T S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 2 1 . 0 0 * 5 2 9 2 3 0 7 / 2 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A I D P A R K I N G L O T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 0 8 7 1 . 5 0 0 2 I M P R O V E M E N T S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 7 1 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 , 0 4 7 . 4 8 5 1 6 1 3 3 E J E Q U I P E J E Q U I P M E N T 0 0 5 8 1 2 4 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - H O S E E N D W E L D M E N T 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 4 4 4 . 1 7 0 2 S T E E L , K A N A F L E X H O S E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 4 4 . 1 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 4 4 . 1 7 5 1 6 1 3 4 F L A T S O S R A Q U E L H E R R E R A 0 7 0 3 1 3 0 7 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - P L U G 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 2 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 . 0 0 * 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 / 1 0 / 1 2 0 1 S T R E E T S - T I R E S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 3 9 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 9 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 1 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 3 5 H D S U P P L Y H D S U P P L Y W A T E R W O R K S , L T D . B 1 9 1 2 6 0 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - S I N G L E P O R T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 6 4 1 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 0 . 0 0 * 10 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 1 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 3 5 H D S U P P L Y H D S U P P L Y W A T E R W O R K S , L T D . B 4 4 9 4 0 5 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - W I R E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 6 4 8 0 . 2 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 0 . 2 1 * B 4 5 7 3 0 6 0 9 / 0 9 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - M U L T I R E A D M O D U L E 8 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 6 4 1 3 5 . 3 9 0 2 C H A N N E L * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 5 . 3 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 1 5 . 6 0 5 1 6 1 3 6 H O M E D E P O H O M E D E P O T 1 0 1 3 7 6 7 0 8 / 2 1 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - D I S P L A C E M E N T W I R E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 0 . 3 7 0 2 C O N N E C T O R S , C H A S E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 . 3 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 . 3 7 5 1 6 1 3 7 H R G R E E N H R G R E E N 8 7 9 9 6 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - C A N N O N B A L L & 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 5 1 5 , 8 7 9 . 4 1 0 2 R T . 4 7 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 , 8 7 9 . 4 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 5 , 8 7 9 . 4 1 5 1 6 1 3 8 I L T R E A S U S T A T E O F I L L I N O I S T R E A S U R E R 1 3 0 9 / 1 5 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - R T . 4 7 E X P A N S I O N P Y M T # 1 3 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 9 1 0 , 1 5 8 . 3 3 0 2 W A T E R O P - R T . 4 7 E X P A N S I O N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 9 1 0 , 7 5 7 . 8 1 0 3 P Y M T # 1 3 * * C O M M E N T * * 0 4 S E W E R O P - R T . 4 7 E X P A N S I O N 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 9 5 , 5 6 4 . 3 8 0 5 P Y M T # 1 3 * * C O M M E N T * * 0 6 D O W N T O W N T I F - R T . 4 7 E X P A N S I O N 8 8 - 8 8 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 9 1 , 6 6 6 . 6 7 0 7 P Y M T # 1 3 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 8 , 1 4 7 . 1 9 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 8 , 1 4 7 . 1 9 11 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 2 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 3 9 I L T R U C K I L L I N O I S T R U C K M A I N T E N A N C E , I N 0 2 6 4 0 8 0 8 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - P U L L & R E P A I R L E A K I N G 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 1 , 3 5 3 . 0 8 0 2 F U E L T A N K * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 3 5 3 . 0 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 3 5 3 . 0 8 5 1 6 1 4 0 I P R F I L L I N O I S P U B L I C R I S K F U N D 1 2 4 9 5 0 8 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - O C T O B E R W O R K E R S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 8 , 4 2 4 . 6 8 0 2 C O M P . I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - P A R K & R E C 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 1 , 7 5 2 . 4 7 0 4 O C T O B E R W O R K E R S C O M P . I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 W A T E R O P - O C T O B E R W O R K E R S C O M P . 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 1 , 0 0 4 . 0 1 0 6 I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 S E W E R O P - O C T O B E R W O R K E R S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 6 5 5 . 6 3 0 8 C O M P . I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * 0 9 L I B R A R Y - O C T O B E R W O R K E R S C O M P . 8 2 - 8 2 0 - 5 2 - 0 0 - 5 2 3 1 1 , 1 5 9 . 2 1 1 0 I N S . * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 2 , 9 9 6 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 2 , 9 9 6 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 4 1 I T R O N I T R O N 2 9 9 3 3 7 0 8 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - H O S T I N G S E R V I C E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 4 7 4 . 4 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 7 4 . 4 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 7 4 . 4 8 5 1 6 1 4 2 J A Y M H E A P J A Y M . H E A P & A S S O C I A T E S , L T D 0 9 0 6 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - R O A D I M P R O V E M E N T P R O J E C T 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 3 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 N E G O T I A T I O N S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 12 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 3 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 4 3 J I F F Y J K E N T E R P R I S E S , I N C . 6 8 9 0 6 3 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - O I L C H N A G E , C A R W A S H 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 4 1 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 1 . 9 8 * 6 8 9 2 3 5 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - O I L C H A N G E , C A R W A S H , 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 7 4 . 6 7 0 2 T I R E R O T A T I O N * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 4 . 6 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 1 6 . 6 5 5 1 6 1 4 4 J I M S T R C K J A M E S G R I B B L E 1 4 7 1 7 1 0 7 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 1 7 2 0 7 / 1 8 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 6 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 1 9 8 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 1 9 9 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 2 0 0 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 3 3 6 0 7 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 5 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 3 3 7 0 7 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 6 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 . 0 0 * 1 4 7 3 3 8 0 7 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - T R U C K I N S P E C T I O N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 2 6 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 0 3 . 0 0 13 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 4 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 4 5 J O H N S O I L J O H N S O N O I L C O M P A N Y I L N P 3 8 9 5 0 0 6 5 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 3 4 8 . 2 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 4 8 . 2 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 4 8 . 2 5 5 1 6 1 4 6 J U S T S A F E J U S T S A F E T Y , L T D 2 0 1 3 5 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - F I R S T A I D S U P P L I E S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 9 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 4 7 K C C O N C K E N D A L L C O U N T Y C O N C R E T E 3 2 0 0 6 0 8 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 L A N D C A S H - C O N C R E T E 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 6 4 6 . 2 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 4 6 . 2 5 * 3 2 0 2 4 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 L A N D C A S H - C O N C R E T E 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 1 , 6 4 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 6 4 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 , 2 9 1 . 2 5 5 1 6 1 4 8 K C R E C O R D K E N D A L L C O U N T Y R E C O R D 2 3 9 7 7 0 8 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 C O U N T R Y S I D E T I F - O R D I N A N C E 8 7 - 8 7 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 0 1 1 0 . 4 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 1 0 . 4 0 * 2 4 2 5 4 0 8 / 0 8 / 1 3 0 1 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - P R E S T W I C K 9 0 - 0 5 5 - 5 5 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 1 1 6 . 0 0 0 2 A M E N D M E N T T O A N N E X A T I O N * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M C H U G H 9 0 - 0 5 4 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 5 1 . 6 0 0 4 A N N E X A T I O N P U B L I C H E A R I N G * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 6 7 . 6 0 * 2 4 5 0 5 0 8 / 1 5 / 1 3 0 1 C O U N T R Y S I D E T I F - P U B L I C H E A R I N G 8 7 - 8 7 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 0 1 0 . 4 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 . 4 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 8 8 . 4 0 14 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 5 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 4 9 K E N P R I N T A N N E T T E M . P O W E L L 1 9 1 4 9 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - 5 0 0 B U S I N E S S C A R D S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 5 8 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 8 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 8 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 5 0 K E T C H M A M M A T T H E W K E T C H M A R K 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - F T O T R A I N I N G M E A L 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 2 0 . 6 4 0 2 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 . 6 4 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 0 . 6 4 5 1 6 1 5 1 L A F A R G E L A F A R G E A G G R E G A T E S I L L I N O I S 2 7 8 0 4 2 1 4 0 7 / 1 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - P E A G R A V E L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 2 2 7 . 3 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 2 7 . 3 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 2 7 . 3 3 5 1 6 1 5 2 M C K I R G N R A N D Y M C K I R G A N 7 5 3 7 8 0 8 / 1 4 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - B I O D I E S E L 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 1 , 1 0 7 . 7 0 0 2 W A T E R O P - B I O D I E S E L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 1 , 1 0 7 . 7 0 0 3 S E W E R O P - B I O D I E S E L 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 1 , 1 0 7 . 7 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 , 3 2 3 . 1 0 * 7 5 4 5 4 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - B I O D I E S E L 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 7 3 5 . 3 2 0 2 W A T E R O P - B I O D I E S E L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 7 3 5 . 3 2 0 3 S E W E R O P - B I O D I E S E L 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 7 3 5 . 3 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 2 0 5 . 9 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 , 5 2 9 . 0 6 5 1 6 1 5 3 M C O F F I C E M C G R A T H O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T , I N C . 15 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 6 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 5 3 M C O F F I C E M C G R A T H O F F I C E E Q U I P M E N T , I N C . 1 0 2 7 5 3 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 1 9 5 . 5 6 0 2 F I N A N C E - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 1 5 6 . 4 4 0 3 C O M M / D E V - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 2 1 6 . 7 5 0 4 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 4 5 7 . 0 0 0 5 S T R E E T S - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 4 2 . 0 0 0 6 W A T E R O P - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 4 2 . 0 0 0 7 S E W E R O P - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 4 2 . 0 0 0 8 R E C R E A T I O N - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 3 1 0 . 1 3 0 9 P A R K S - A U G U S T C O P I E R L E A S E 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 5 7 8 . 1 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 5 4 0 . 0 0 * 1 0 2 7 5 4 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 3 5 3 . 3 5 0 2 F I N A N C E - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 0 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 1 1 7 . 7 8 0 3 C O M M / D E V - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 9 2 . 1 4 0 4 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 7 9 . 5 5 0 5 W A T E R O P - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 1 . 8 4 0 6 S E W E R O P - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 3 0 1 . 8 4 0 7 P A R K S - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 1 6 . 5 8 0 8 R E C R E A T I O N - A U G U S T C O P Y C H A R G E S 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 2 4 9 . 5 2 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 1 2 . 6 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 , 4 5 2 . 6 0 5 1 6 1 5 4 M E N L A N D M E N A R D S - Y O R K V I L L E 3 9 8 5 6 0 8 / 1 4 / 1 3 0 1 L A N D C A S H - N A I L S 7 2 - 7 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 4 4 2 0 . 9 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 . 9 4 * 4 0 9 5 4 0 8 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - G L O V E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 0 0 1 3 . 9 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 . 9 5 * 4 0 9 6 2 0 8 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - G R E E N T A R P S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 6 . 9 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 . 9 9 * 4 1 6 2 0 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - A I R C R A F T B I T 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 0 8 . 1 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 . 1 9 * 16 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 7 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 5 4 M E N L A N D M E N A R D S - Y O R K V I L L E 4 1 7 2 2 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - G O R I L L A T A P E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 8 . 4 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 . 4 7 * 4 2 2 7 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - L A G S C R E W S , B U S H I N G , 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 5 . 1 1 0 2 N I P P L E S , C O U P L I N G , B O L T S N A P S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 . 1 1 * 4 2 3 8 6 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - E Y E D R O P S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 1 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 . 9 8 * 4 2 4 3 1 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - B A T T E R I E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 3 2 3 . 9 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 3 . 9 4 * 4 2 5 1 8 - 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - F I X E D P O S T N 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 3 . 9 6 0 2 P H O T O C O N T R O L * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 . 9 6 * 4 2 5 2 2 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - S T U D S , N A I L S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 5 7 . 0 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 7 . 0 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 7 0 . 5 9 5 1 6 1 5 5 M I D A M M I D A M E R I C A N W A T E R 8 4 6 2 3 A 0 5 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - M A N H O L E R I N G S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 1 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 3 2 0 . 0 0 * 8 4 8 5 2 A 0 5 / 1 6 / 1 3 0 1 S E W E R O P - P V C P I P E , W Y E 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 9 2 1 4 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 1 4 . 0 0 * 8 5 0 5 9 A 0 5 / 2 4 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - B O X E A S Y S T I C K S , 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 6 1 1 . 0 0 0 2 M A N H O L E R I N G S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 1 1 . 0 0 * 8 9 1 4 4 A 0 8 / 1 2 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C H E C K V A L V E S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 6 4 1 , 4 6 4 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 4 6 4 . 0 0 * 17 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 8 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 5 5 M I D A M M I D A M E R I C A N W A T E R 9 6 8 3 6 A 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - C O N C R E T E R I N G 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 5 8 . 5 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 8 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 , 6 6 7 . 5 0 5 1 6 1 5 6 M I N E R M I N E R E L E C T R O N I C S C O R P O R A T I O N 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - P A S S E N G E R S I D E S W E E P 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 9 5 . 0 0 0 2 R E P A I R E D * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 * 2 5 1 0 0 1 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - R E P L A C E D S E L F C O N T A I N E D 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 9 5 . 0 0 0 2 S T R O B E L I G H T S W I T H L E D L I G H T S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A N D A D D E D F L A S H E R F O R L E D S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 9 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 5 7 N I C O R N I C O R G A S 0 0 - 4 1 - 2 2 - 8 7 4 8 4 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 1 0 7 P R A I R I E L A N E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 5 1 . 6 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 1 . 6 9 * 1 5 - 4 1 - 5 0 - 1 0 0 0 6 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 8 0 4 G A M E F A R M R D 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 9 4 . 4 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 4 . 4 4 * 1 5 - 6 3 - 7 4 - 5 7 3 3 2 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 9 5 5 B R I D G E S T R E E T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 2 . 8 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 2 . 8 8 * 1 5 - 6 4 - 6 1 - 3 5 3 2 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 9 9 1 C A N N O N B A L L T R A I L 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 0 . 1 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 0 . 1 1 * 2 0 - 5 2 - 5 6 - 2 0 4 2 1 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 4 2 0 F A I R H A V E N 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 7 6 . 2 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 6 . 2 5 * 18 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 9 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 5 7 N I C O R N I C O R G A S 2 3 - 4 5 - 9 1 - 4 8 6 2 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 0 1 B R U E L L S T R E E T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 8 4 . 5 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 4 . 5 6 * 3 1 - 6 1 - 6 7 - 2 4 9 3 1 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 2 7 6 W I N D H A M C I R C L E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 2 4 . 9 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 4 . 9 6 * 4 5 - 1 2 - 2 5 - 4 0 8 1 3 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 2 0 1 W H Y D R A U L I C S T R E E T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 5 . 1 3 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 5 . 1 3 * 4 6 - 6 9 - 4 7 - 6 7 2 7 1 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 9 7 5 B R I D G E S T R E E T 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 7 8 . 2 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 8 . 2 8 * 4 9 - 2 5 - 6 1 - 1 0 0 0 5 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 V A N E M M O N R D 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 3 8 . 7 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 8 . 7 9 * 6 6 - 7 0 - 4 4 - 6 9 4 2 9 - 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - 1 0 0 R A I N T R E E R D 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 8 0 9 2 . 4 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 2 . 4 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 3 9 . 5 6 5 1 6 1 5 8 O R R K K A T H L E E N F I E L D O R R & A S S O C . 1 4 1 0 9 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - M I S C E L L A N E O U S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 6 2 , 7 0 1 . 1 8 0 2 C I T Y L E G A L M A T T E R S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - G R A N D E R E S E R V E 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 6 1 , 6 9 1 . 0 0 0 4 M A T T E R S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - K E N D A L L M A R K E T 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 6 1 4 2 . 5 0 0 6 P L A C E M A T T E R S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - M E E T I N G S 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 6 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 8 A D M I N S E R V I C E S - W I N D E T T R I D G E 0 1 - 6 4 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 5 6 2 , 8 4 0 . 5 0 0 9 M A T T E R S * * C O M M E N T * * 1 0 P A R K S - L E G A L M A T T E R S 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 6 1 4 2 . 5 0 1 1 C O U N T R Y S I D E T I F - L E G A L M A T T E R S 8 7 - 8 7 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 0 3 8 0 . 0 0 1 2 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - K E N D A L L 9 0 - 0 3 9 - 3 9 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 4 2 7 . 5 0 19 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 0 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 5 8 O R R K K A T H L E E N F I E L D O R R & A S S O C . 1 4 1 0 9 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 1 3 C R O S S I N G * * C O M M E N T * * 1 4 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - P R I O R I T Y 9 0 - 0 4 4 - 4 4 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 7 9 1 . 6 6 1 5 H E A L T H * * C O M M E N T * * 1 6 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M I D L A N D 9 0 - 0 4 6 - 4 6 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 3 0 8 . 7 5 1 7 B A N K * * C O M M E N T * * 1 8 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M C H U G H 9 0 - 0 5 4 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 2 3 7 . 5 0 1 9 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - P R E S T W I C K 9 0 - 0 5 5 - 5 5 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 1 , 5 2 7 . 9 1 2 0 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - R A I N T R E E 9 0 - 0 5 6 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 3 , 1 1 6 . 0 0 2 1 F O X H I L L S S A - O R D I N A N C E R E V I E W 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 6 1 9 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 5 , 4 9 7 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 5 , 4 9 7 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 5 9 O S W E G O V I L L A G E O F O S W E G O 2 0 1 3 0 3 4 6 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 D O W N T O W N T I F - C O M M U N I T Y 8 8 - 8 8 0 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 0 0 1 9 2 . 6 5 0 2 R E L A T I O N S F E E S O W E D F O R A M O Y * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 K A Y A K T R I P J U L Y 2 0 , 2 0 1 3 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 9 2 . 6 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 9 2 . 6 5 5 1 6 1 6 0 P A R A D I S E P A R A D I S E C A R W A S H 2 2 2 6 4 3 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C A R W A S H E S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 5 9 5 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 5 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 6 1 R 0 0 0 0 7 9 6 R E O P R O P E R T Y C O N S U L T A N T S 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - R E F U N D O V E R P A Y M E N T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 1 8 6 . 8 1 0 2 F O R F I N A L B I L L F O R A C C O U N T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 # 0 1 0 7 4 6 3 6 2 0 - 0 1 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 8 6 . 8 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 8 6 . 8 1 20 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 1 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 6 2 R 0 0 0 0 7 9 7 B R E N D A K A Y L A U N I U S 0 9 0 8 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - B E E C H E R D E P O S I T R E F U N D 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 1 0 4 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 6 3 R 0 0 0 1 2 4 4 A N T O I N E T T E G R O G A N 0 8 2 8 1 3 0 8 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - R E F U N D E D T O W F E E 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 4 3 - 0 0 - 4 3 2 5 5 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 6 4 R 0 0 0 1 2 4 5 J O N I C H O U D H A R Y 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - R E F U N D O V E R P A Y M E N T O N 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 5 3 . 9 5 0 2 F I N A L B I L L F O R A C C O U N T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 # 0 1 0 7 3 4 4 2 5 0 - 0 1 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 3 . 9 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 3 . 9 5 5 1 6 1 6 5 R 0 0 0 1 2 4 6 K A Y G A Y L O R D 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - R E F U N D O F F I N A L P A Y M E N T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 5 9 . 9 5 0 2 O N F I N A L B I L L F O R A C C O U N T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 # 0 1 0 5 1 6 0 8 0 0 - 0 3 * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 9 . 9 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 9 . 9 5 5 1 6 1 6 6 R O N W E S T R O N W E S T P H A L C H E V R O L E T 3 6 9 7 5 4 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 V E H I C L E & E Q U I P M E N T - R E P A I R 2 5 - 2 0 5 - 6 0 - 0 0 - 6 0 7 0 1 0 2 . 5 0 0 2 D R I V E R S S I D E P O W E R S E A T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 2 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 2 . 5 0 21 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 2 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 6 7 S C H O N S T E S C H O N S T E D T I N S T R U M E N T C O M P A N Y 0 0 1 1 8 0 8 9 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - 5 2 C X R E P A I R 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 3 0 2 . 6 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 0 2 . 6 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 0 2 . 6 0 5 1 6 1 6 8 S P A R L I N G S P A R L I N G I N S T R U M E N T S , I N C . 5 5 0 7 3 0 1 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - F T 1 9 4 - 1 - 1 W I T H V 1 - V 2 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 6 9 6 . 5 5 0 2 C O N V E R S I O N K I T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 9 6 . 5 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 9 6 . 5 5 5 1 6 1 6 9 S P E E D W A Y S P E E D W A Y 1 0 0 1 5 4 2 4 3 8 - 0 9 1 3 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 P A R K S - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 1 , 3 2 1 . 1 8 0 2 R E C R E A T I O N - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 5 2 . 1 0 0 3 P O L I C E - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 5 , 6 0 3 . 3 4 0 4 W A T E R O P - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 6 7 8 . 5 1 0 5 S E W E R O P - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 6 7 8 . 5 1 0 6 S T R E E T S - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 6 7 8 . 5 1 0 7 C O M M / D E V - A U G U S T G A S O L I N E 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 2 5 9 . 4 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 , 2 7 1 . 5 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 , 2 7 1 . 5 5 5 1 6 1 7 0 S T O N E F I R S T O N E F I R E R E S T A U R A N T 0 9 1 0 1 3 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - R E F U N D O V E R P A Y M E N T O N 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 3 7 1 5 5 . 7 5 0 2 F I N A L W A T E R B I L L * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 5 . 7 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 5 . 7 5 5 1 6 1 7 1 S U B U R B A N S U N - T I M E S M E D I A 22 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 3 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 7 1 S U B U R B A N S U N - T I M E S M E D I A 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 6 1 - C I T Y 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 3 0 1 C O M M / D E V - 2 0 1 3 R O A D W A Y P R O G R A M 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 2 6 3 2 0 . 5 3 0 2 S E W E R O P - S E W E R D E P T . O P E R A T O R 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 5 9 5 . 0 0 0 3 J O B P O S T I N G * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 1 5 . 5 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 9 1 5 . 5 3 5 1 6 1 7 2 T A P C O T A P C O I 4 2 4 7 3 1 0 6 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - S T R E E T S I G N S 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 9 6 6 . 7 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 6 . 7 4 * I 4 2 4 7 3 2 0 6 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - S T R E E T S I G N S 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 9 2 0 4 . 8 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 0 4 . 8 9 * I 4 2 4 7 3 3 0 6 / 1 1 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - C O R N E R B O L T S 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 9 8 4 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 8 4 . 0 0 * I 4 2 6 4 7 3 0 6 / 2 8 / 1 3 0 1 M F T - S T R E E T S I G N 1 5 - 1 5 5 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 9 1 3 1 . 9 4 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 1 . 9 4 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 8 7 . 5 7 5 1 6 1 7 3 T I G E R D I R T I G E R D I R E C T J 4 9 6 1 4 7 5 0 1 0 2 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - L A S E R J E T P R I N T E R , 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 1 6 4 . 6 6 0 2 T O N E R * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 6 4 . 6 6 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 6 4 . 6 6 5 1 6 1 7 4 V E R I Z O N V E R I Z O N W I R E L E S S 9 7 1 0 8 3 2 4 2 0 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 1 C O M M / D E V - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 2 7 . 6 1 23 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 4 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 7 4 V E R I Z O N V E R I Z O N W I R E L E S S 9 7 1 0 8 3 2 4 2 0 0 9 / 0 1 / 1 3 0 2 P O L I C E - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 7 7 0 . 7 3 0 3 P A R K S - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 7 9 - 7 9 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 5 8 . 9 0 0 4 R E C R E A T I O N - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 7 9 - 7 9 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 4 7 . 8 5 0 5 W A T E R O P - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 2 3 2 . 3 8 0 6 S E W E R O P - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 5 2 - 5 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 8 0 . 7 6 0 7 S T R E E T S - A U G U S T C E L L P H O N E 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 0 1 4 3 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 , 7 6 2 . 2 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 , 7 6 2 . 2 1 5 1 6 1 7 5 V I T O S H C H R I S T I N E M . V I T O S H 1 5 6 4 0 8 / 2 3 / 1 3 0 1 C O M M / D E V - G R A N D E R E S E R V E 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 6 1 3 9 . 1 0 0 2 A M E N D E D A N N E X A T I O N & P U D * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A G R E E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 3 9 . 1 0 * 1 5 7 2 0 8 / 2 1 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - A U G . 2 8 A D M I N H E A R I N G 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 0 . 0 0 * 1 5 7 5 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - S E P T E M B E R 4 A D M I N 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 H E A R I N G * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 3 9 . 1 0 5 1 6 1 7 6 W A R E H O U S W A R E H O U S E D I R E C T 2 0 3 9 2 5 8 - 1 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - F O L D E R S 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 1 0 7 9 . 9 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 7 9 . 9 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 7 9 . 9 0 5 1 6 1 7 7 W A T E R S Y S W A T E R S O L U T I O N S U N L I M I T E D , I N C 24 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 5 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 7 7 W A T E R S Y S W A T E R S O L U T I O N S U N L I M I T E D , I N C 3 3 6 2 4 0 8 / 2 7 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - W S U 1 1 0 B U L K 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 3 8 2 , 0 5 2 . 7 5 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 , 0 5 2 . 7 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 2 , 0 5 2 . 7 5 5 1 6 1 7 8 W E R D E R W W A L L Y W E R D E R I C H 0 9 0 5 1 3 0 9 / 0 5 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - A U G U S T 1 4 & 2 8 A D M I N 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 7 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 H E A R I N G S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 0 0 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 7 9 W T R P R D W A T E R P R O D U C T S , I N C . 0 2 4 2 9 6 4 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C U R B S T O P S , C A P S , 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 5 7 6 . 3 7 0 2 L U G S , G A S K E T S , T - B O L T S , B A N D * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 R E P A I R C L A M P S , C U R B B O X * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 7 6 . 3 7 * C H E C K T O T A L : 5 7 6 . 3 7 5 1 6 1 8 0 Y B S D Y O R K V I L L E B R I S T O L 0 8 3 1 1 3 S F 0 9 / 1 0 / 1 3 0 1 E S C R O W - A U G U S T 2 0 1 3 S A N I T A R Y 9 5 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 5 0 3 0 1 , 7 8 6 . 3 5 0 2 F E E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 0 1 , 7 8 6 . 3 5 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 0 1 , 7 8 6 . 3 5 5 1 6 1 8 1 Y O R K A C E Y O R K V I L L E A C E & R A D I O S H A C K 1 4 9 9 0 1 0 8 / 3 0 / 1 3 0 1 C O M M / D E V - T A I L L I G H T 0 1 - 2 2 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 3 . 4 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 . 4 9 * 25 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 6 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 8 1 Y O R K A C E Y O R K V I L L E A C E & R A D I O S H A C K 1 4 9 9 3 0 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C E M E N T P V C , C O R E D 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 4 0 9 . 4 8 0 2 P L U G * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 9 . 4 8 * 1 4 9 9 3 7 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - W A S H B R U S H , R A I N X , 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 0 5 3 . 2 3 0 2 G L A S S C L E A N E R , T I R E P R O T E C T A N T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 M I C R O F I B E R C L O T H * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 3 . 2 3 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 6 . 2 0 5 1 6 1 8 2 Y O R K N A P A Y O R K V I L L E N A P A A U T O P A R T S 0 5 0 2 0 6 0 8 / 1 6 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - O I L F I L T E R 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 5 . 1 1 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 . 1 1 * 0 5 0 5 6 6 0 8 / 2 0 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - B U L B 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 9 0 3 . 7 7 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 . 7 7 * 0 5 0 6 4 3 0 8 / 2 1 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - O I L D R I 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 3 8 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 8 . 0 0 * 0 5 0 7 5 3 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C I R C U I T T E S T E R S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 1 8 . 6 6 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 8 . 6 6 * 0 5 0 7 7 2 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - C O N N E C T O R 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 1 0 . 3 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 . 3 9 * 0 5 1 4 0 9 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - S P L A S H G U A R D 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 1 8 . 4 9 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 8 . 4 9 * 0 5 1 4 1 2 0 8 / 2 9 / 1 3 0 1 S T R E E T S - M U D F L A P S 0 1 - 4 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 2 8 5 4 . 9 8 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 5 4 . 9 8 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 4 9 . 4 0 26 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 2 7 TI M E : 0 8 : 4 6 : 4 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 2 4 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 8 3 Y O R K P D P C Y O R K V I L L E P O L I C E D E P T . 0 9 0 3 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 P O L I C E - W A T E R & I C E F O R 0 1 - 2 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 5 0 3 2 . 0 0 0 2 H O M E T O W N D A Y S * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 A D M I N - R E F U N D O F O V E R P A Y M E N T 0 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 0 2 . 0 0 0 4 O N F I N E * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 4 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 4 . 0 0 5 1 6 1 8 4 Y O U N G M M A R L Y S J . Y O U N G 0 8 1 4 1 3 0 9 / 0 3 / 1 3 0 1 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M I D L A N D S T A T E 9 0 - 0 4 6 - 4 6 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 7 . 8 7 0 2 B A N K S P E C I A L U S E P E R M I T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M C H U G H 9 0 - 0 5 4 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 7 . 8 7 0 4 R E Z O N I N G * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - P R E S T W I C K 9 0 - 0 5 5 - 5 5 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 7 . 8 7 0 6 F I N A L P L A T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 A D M I N - A U G U S T 1 4 P L A N 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 2 . 6 4 0 8 C O M M I S S I O N M E E T I N G M I N U T E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 2 6 . 2 5 * 0 8 2 0 1 3 0 9 / 0 8 / 1 3 0 1 A D M I N - A U G U S T 2 0 P W C O M M I T T E E 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 1 9 . 5 0 0 2 M E E T I N G M I N U T E S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 9 . 5 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 5 . 7 5 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 6 5 3 , 0 1 3 . 2 4 27 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 6 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 2 : 0 9 : 2 3 M A N U A L C H E C K R E G I S T E R ID : A P 2 2 5 0 0 0 . C B L CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I T E M C H E C K I N V O I C E # D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N D A T E A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 1 0 1 6 K C R K E N D A L L C O U N T Y R E C O R D E R ' S 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 1 6 6 8 6 9 0 9 / 0 6 / 1 3 0 1 D E V E L O P E R E S C R O W - M I D L A N D 9 0 - 0 4 6 - 4 6 - 0 0 - 0 0 1 1 5 1 . 0 0 0 2 S T A T E B A N K S P E C I A L U S E * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 W A T E R O P - R E L E A S E W A T E R L I E N S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 9 8 . 0 0 0 4 V E H I C L E & E Q U I P M E N T - M O W I N G 2 5 - 2 1 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 1 9 6 . 0 0 0 5 L I E N S * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 3 4 5 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 3 4 5 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 3 4 5 . 0 0 28 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 0 : 1 8 : 4 8 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 1 2 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 0 6 R 0 0 0 1 2 2 7 I R E N E & W A Y N E K A U F F M A N 2 0 1 3 0 1 5 3 - B U I L D 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 M U N I C I P A L B L D G - 2 4 3 8 S A G E C T 1 6 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 B U I L D P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 V E H I C L E & E Q U I P M E N T - 2 4 3 8 S A G E 2 5 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 2 4 4 5 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 4 C T . B U I L D P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 C W C A P I T A L - 2 4 3 8 S A G E C T B U I L D 2 3 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 5 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 0 6 P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 W A T E R O P - 2 4 3 8 S A G E C T . B U I L D 5 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 2 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 8 P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 29 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 6 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 1 : 0 4 : 0 8 M A N U A L C H E C K R E G I S T E R ID : A P 2 2 5 0 0 0 . C B L CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I T E M C H E C K I N V O I C E # D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N D A T E A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 1 0 1 7 K C R K E N D A L L C O U N T Y R E C O R D E R ' S 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 1 6 7 0 8 3 0 9 / 1 3 / 1 3 0 1 R E L E A S E O F M O W I N G L I E N 2 5 - 2 1 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 4 9 . 0 0 0 2 R E L E A S E O F W A T E R L I E N 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 4 9 . 0 0 0 3 M O W I N G L I E N S F I L E D 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 1 4 7 . 0 0 0 4 F I L I N G O F M O W I N G L I E N S 2 5 - 2 1 5 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 4 8 9 9 . 0 0 0 5 S A T I S F A C T I O N O F T A X L I E N S 0 1 - 1 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 6 2 9 8 . 0 0 I N V O I C E T O T A L : 4 4 2 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 4 4 2 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 4 4 2 . 0 0 30 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 7 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 1 3 : 1 4 : 5 6 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 1 7 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 0 7 L A W R E N K L A W R E N T Z , K E V I N 0 9 1 6 1 3 0 9 / 1 6 / 1 3 0 1 W A T E R O P - I P W A C O N F E R E N C E M E A L 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 4 - 0 0 - 5 4 1 5 4 0 . 0 1 0 2 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 W A T E R O P - C O N F E R E N C E G A S 5 1 - 5 1 0 - 5 6 - 0 0 - 5 6 9 5 2 0 . 0 0 0 4 R E I M B U R S E M E N T * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 6 0 . 0 1 * C H E C K T O T A L : 6 0 . 0 1 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 6 0 . 0 1 31 DA T E : 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E P A G E : 1 TI M E : 0 8 : 1 3 : 1 9 C H E C K R E G I S T E R PR G I D : A P 2 1 5 0 0 0 . W O W C H E C K D A T E : 0 9 / 1 8 / 1 3 CH E C K # V E N D O R # I N V O I C E I N V O I C E I T E M N U M B E R D A T E # D E S C R I P T I O N A C C O U N T # I T E M A M T -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 1 0 8 R 0 0 0 1 2 2 8 L I N D L E D A I L E Y 2 0 1 3 0 1 5 2 0 8 / 2 2 / 1 3 0 1 M U N I C I P A L B L D G - 2 1 4 1 P R A I R I E 1 6 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 3 0 0 . 0 0 0 2 G R A S S L A N E B U I L D P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 3 V E H I C L E & E Q U I P M E N T - 2 1 4 1 2 5 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 2 1 - 2 4 4 5 1 , 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 4 P R A I R I E G R A S S L A N E B U I L D L A N E * * C O M M E N T * * 0 5 C W C A P I T A L - 2 1 4 1 P R A I R I E G R A S S 2 3 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 5 , 6 4 0 . 0 0 0 6 G R A S S L A N E B U I L D P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * 0 7 W A T E R O P - 2 1 4 1 P R A I R I E G R A S S 5 1 - 0 0 0 - 2 4 - 0 0 - 2 4 4 5 2 , 6 6 0 . 0 0 0 8 L A N E B U I L D P R O G R A M * * C O M M E N T * * I N V O I C E T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 * C H E C K T O T A L : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 T O T A L A M O U N T P A I D : 1 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 32 REGULAR OVERTIME TOTAL IMRF FICA TOTALS ADMINISTRATION 12,112.06$ 243.75$ 12,355.81$ 1,325.78$ 872.62$ 14,554.21$ FINANCE 7,271.26 - 7,271.26 812.39 556.02 8,639.67 POLICE 83,509.71 8,276.43 91,786.14 481.95 6,774.03 99,042.12 COMMUNITY DEV.7,849.87 - 7,849.87 795.40 569.28 9,214.55 STREETS 11,384.55 - 11,384.55 1,221.57 837.70 13,443.82 WATER 12,064.03 534.22 12,598.25 1,351.79 916.79 14,866.83 SEWER 6,216.83 - 6,216.83 667.07 468.65 7,352.55 PARKS 17,905.91 - 17,905.91 1,873.60 1,331.23 21,110.74 RECREATION 11,506.79 - 11,506.79 1,036.49 841.02 13,384.30 LIBRARY 15,758.89 - 15,758.89 1,003.61 1,174.96 17,937.46 TOTALS 185,579.90$ 9,054.40$ 194,634.30$ 10,569.65$ 14,342.30$ 219,546.25$ TOTAL PAYROLL 219,546.25$ UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PAYROLL SUMMARY September 13, 2013 33 DATE BI-WEEKLY 9/13/2013 $219,546.25 $219,546.25 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLERK'S MANUAL CHECK - #131016- KENDALL COUNTY RECORDER 9/6/2013 $345.00 MANUAL CHECK - #516106 - KAUFFMAN BUILD CHECK 9/12/2013 $10,000.00 CLERK'S MANUAL CHECK - #131017- KENDALL COUNTY RECORDER 9/16/2013 $442.00 MANUAL CHECK - #516107 -KEVIN LAWRENTZ- REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES 9/17/2013 $60.01 MANUAL CHECK - #516108 -DAILEY BUILD CHECK 9/18/2013 $10,000.00 BILLS LIST 9/24/2013 $653,013.24 $673,860.25 $893,406.50 TOTAL BILLS PAID TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL BILL LIST SUMMARY Tuesday, September 24, 2013 PAYROLL TOTAL PAYROLL 34 Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Mayor #1 Tracking Number CC 2013-64 Proclamation for Constitution Week City Council – September 24, 2013 Mayor Golinski Name Department UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Proclamation WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States of America, the guardian of our liberties, embodies the principles of limited government in a Republic dedicated to rule by law; and WHEREAS, September 17, 2013, marks the two hundred twenty-sixth anniversary of the framing of the Constitution of the United States of America by the Constitutional Convention; and WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to accord official recognition to this magnificent document and its memorable anniversary, and to the patriotic celebrations which will commemorate it; and WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuing of a proclamation each year by the President of the United States of America designating September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gary J. Golinski, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as CONSTITUTION WEEK And ask our citizens to reaffirm the ideals the Framers of the Constitution had in 1787 by vigilantly protecting the freedoms guaranteed to us through this guardian of our liberties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the United City of Yorkville to be affixed this 24th day of September, in the year of our Lord, two thousand thirteen. _____________________________ Gary J. Golinski, Mayor Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Mayor #2 Tracking Number CC 2013-65 Resolution Supporting “Countywide Pay as We Grow Plan” Grant Application to CMAP City Council – September 24, 2013 Majority Approval See attached memo. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Consideration of a resolution of approving a Kendall County CMAP grant. Background The CMAP Local Technical Assistance Program is a grant offered by CMAP to municipalities for regional planning or cooperation studies and projects. The City has submitted an application to CMAP with the Village of Oswego and the Village of Montgomery to study regional consolidation of services. The only commitment the City has made to Oswego and Montgomery is staff time, and the application is attached for your review. After we had committed to participate with Oswego and Montgomery, Kendall County approached us and asked us to support a grant application for a region-wide study of the cost of growth and asked for our participation in the study. This was discussed at the September Kendall County Mayors and Managers meeting and both the mayor and I feel it is a worthy study to support. While the grant application and the City’s own ordinances do not require a formal approval by City Council, Kendall County felt that a resolution of support would improve their chances of receiving a grant. The only commitment the City will be making is for staff time to produce documents, participate in meetings and review the study as occurs. The result of the study could be a tailored report and data for us to use in planning and managing growth – so there is a deliverable in the study from which we will benefit. We could back out of the study at any time at our discretion but we think the study will be useful to the City as it goes forward. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the resolution of support for the Kendall County CMAP grant. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: Subject: Resolution No. 2013-______ Page 1 Resolution No. 2013-_____ RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE “COUNTYWIDE PAY AS WE GROW PLAN” GRANT APPLICATION TO CHICAGO METROPOLITAN AGENCY FOR PLANNING WHEREAS, Kendall County has submitted a grant application for local technical assistance offered through CMAP (Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning) to create a “Countywide Pay As We Grow Plan”; and WHEREAS, this proposed plan would comprehensively analyze the annual rate of residential growth that can be absorbed and served effectively by each taxing unit within Kendall County, including the county, schools, villages/cities, library districts, park districts, forest preserve district, fire districts, sanitary sewer districts, townships, and other taxing districts, while minimizing property tax impact on residents; and WHEREAS, the implementation of the proposed “Countywide Pay As We Grow Plan” would fulfill the GO TO 2040 recommendations as a comprehensive sustainability plan incorporating goals for livable communities, education and efficient governance; and WHEREAS, the “Countywide Pay As We Grow Plan” would also benefit the public and people of our community; and WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville acknowledges that undertaking such a plan requires a firm commitment and use of staff resources; and WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville desires to participate and lead in regional cooperative efforts to improve our entire community and serve as a model of such a collaborative effort; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, if Kendall County is awarded a local technical assistance grant by CMAP, the United City of Yorkville agrees to participate and lead in this effort; BE IT FURTHER RESOVLVED, the United City of Yorkville appoints City Administrator Bart Olson as contact for this project, and The “Countywide Pay As We Grow Plan” is hereby supported by the United City of Yorkville. ADOPTED BY the United City of Yorkville, this ____ day of _________________, A.D. 2013. CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ LARRY KOT ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ ROSE ANN SPEARS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ Resolution No. 2013-______ Page 2 Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ________ day of ____________________, A.D. 2013. ______________________________ MAYOR ______________________________ ATTEST: CITY CLERK Application form: Community Planning program and Local Technical Assistance program DEADLINE: Noon on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 This application form is online at www.rtachicago.com/applications. You may submit the form by email to applications@rtachicago.com. Upon receipt of application, you will receive an e-mail verifying that your application has been received. 1. Name of Applicant: Village of Oswego 2. Main Contact for Application (please include name, phone number and email): Tia Brooks 630-551-2392 Tbrooks@oswegoil.org 3. Type of Applicant (please check any that apply): ____ Local government __X__ Multijurisdictional group* Please list the members of the group (including government and nongovernmental organizations): The Village of Oswego, The Village of Montgomery, The United City of Yorkville __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ ____ Nongovernmental organization* Name of local government partner(s): __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ *Applications submitted by multijurisdictional groups and nongovernmental organizations must include a letter indicating support from each relevant local government. See the FAQs for more information. Nongovernmental applicants are strongly encouraged to contact CMAP or the RTA prior to submitting their application to discuss their project and the demonstration of local support. 4. Project Type (please check any that apply): Please check all statements below that describe characteristics of your project. (This will help us determine whether your project is best handled by CMAP or RTA.) _X___ My project involves preparation of a plan. ____ My project helps to implement a past plan. ____ My project links land use, transportation, and housing. ____ My project has direct relevance to public transit and supports the use of the existing transit system. _X___ My project is not directly related to transportation or land use, but implements GO TO 2040 in other ways. 5. Project Location: Please provide a brief description of the location of your project. You may include a map if that helps to describe location, but this is not required. If your project helps to implement a past plan, please include a link to that plan. The location of the project includes; the Village of Oswego and The City of Yorkville (both located in Kendall County) and the Village of Montgomery (located in both Kendall and Kane County). 6. Project Description: Please tell us what you would like to do in your community, and what assistance is needed. If you have more than one idea, please submit a separate application for each project. Please be specific, but also brief (less than two pages per project idea)—we simply want to have a basic understanding of what you want to do. CMAP and RTA staff will follow-up with you if we need any additional information to fully understand your proposed project. (Please include any additional information that is relevant, preferably by providing links to online documents.) The Village of Oswego, the Village of Montgomery, and the City of Yorkville would like to propose a multi-community study to specifically research and identify potential opportunities that could be implemented to increase our financial and operational efficiencies through working together. We feel that there is potential to benefit from service sharing, joint purchasing, joint bidding and other yet unexplored areas between our three communities. This type of study would directly address the GO TO 2040 Plan’s intent of efficient government, as well as fostering regional cooperation. There are many opportunities to coordinate or consolidate services within our municipalities and perform them on a joint basis. This project would determine the types of services that would best meet our needs and be most efficient. For example, joint purchasing, bidding or service sharing could possibly result in lower unit costs and less individual coordination for many of those tasks we perform individually (road resurfacing, sidewalk repairs, tree trimming, street sweeping, payroll processing, code enforcement inspections, building inspections, etc.). An objective study of the issue by CMAP would be instrumental in assisting us with identifying the possibilities. The Village of Oswego, the Village of Montgomery, and the City of Yorkville have a common goal of efficient and cost effective governance. We share a common goal and desire to be leaders in the service sharing trend. Since we fall within a multi-county area, it would be advantageous to the study, providing valuable information and solutions for similar communities in the future. Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number PW #1 Tracking Number PW 2013-43 Caledonia Subdivision – Letter of Credit Call City Council – September 24, 2013 Consideration of Approval LOC Call Consideration Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department The United City of Yorkville is currently holding irrevocable letter of credits (LOC’s) as noted below for work to be completed on the Caledonia Subdivision: Phase 1  Old Second Bank No. 2912 $745,764.75  Old Second Bank No. 2927 $57,151.80 Phase 2  Old Second Bank No. 2968 $361,512.45  Old Second Bank No. 309000356 $69,866.50 The LOC’s for Phase 1 of the development have been in place since August 4, 2005 and for Phase 2 of the development since August 11, 2006. The developer has failed to complete the land improvements per the approved plan for the development and has some significant outstanding work as outlined in the attached punchlist letter and cost estimate dated December 19, 2012. We have attached correspondence from the City, dated March 4, 2013 that was sent to the developer in an attempt to obtain a new development schedule. No significant progress has been made since the correspondence was sent. Based on the amount of outstanding work and the lack of progress from the current developer, staff is recommending that the LOC’s be called in their entirety for the completion of the work. In addition to the correspondence noted above, we have attached the copies of the LOC’s for your information. Should the Public Works Committee be in favor of calling the LOC’s for the Caledonia Subdivision, this matter can be placed on the September 24, 2013 City Council meeting agenda for further discussion and consideration. Upon approvals, letters to Old Second Bank will be drafted and sent via certified mail immediately. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: September 9, 2013 Subject: Caledonia Subdivision Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Due to timing considerations, the Administration Committee has not reviewed the proposed RFP at the time of City Council packet creation. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number ADM #1 Tracking Number ADM 2013-51 RFP for Employee Benefits Consulting Services City Council – September 24, 2013 December 2009 Selection of current broker. Majority Approval Draft RFP for future employee benefits consulting/brokerage services. Meghan Ostreko Human Resources Name Department Summary Draft request for proposals for employee benefits consulting/health insurance brokerage services. Background The City has used Better Business Planning (BBP) as its health insurance broker since December 2009. Since then we have implemented cost saving changes to our insurance plan design and have maintained a positive relationship with BBP, who continues to provide staff with valuable guidance in navigating health care reform. However, staff is continually inundated with phone calls from other brokerage firms requesting the opportunity to present their services. In order to ensure that the City is receiving the best possible service in regards to overall brokerage services and control of health care expenses, staff would like to extend an RFP for benefits consulting services. The following timeline is proposed: 09/19/2013 Draft RFP to Administration Committee 09/24/2013 Draft RFP to City Council 10/01/2013 Publish RFP 11/01/2013 Submittal Deadline 11/21/2013 Recommendation to Administration Committee 12/10/2013 Recommendation to City Council 01/01/2014 Contract Begins Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the attached RFP for Employee Benefits Consulting Services. Memorandum To: Administration Committee From: Meghan Ostreko, HR Manager CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: September 9, 2013 Subject: RFP for Employee Benefits Consulting Services UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CONSULTING SERVICES ISSUED OCTOBER 1, 2013 PROPOSALS DUE NOVEMBER 1, 2013, 4:00 P.M. United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 Fax: 630-553-7575 2 United City of Yorkville Request for Proposals: Employee Benefits Consulting Services The intent of the Request for Proposals as it is issued by the United City of Yorkville is to solicit bids/proposals for consulting services to assist the City in administering its employee benefits programs. Proposals will be submitted in sealed envelopes and must be addressed to and received at: United City of Yorkville Attn: Meghan Ostreko – HR Mgr. 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Completed proposals shall be received no later than 4:00 P.M. on November 1, 2013. Four (4) copies of complete proposals shall be sealed and placed in an envelope and are to be clearly marked “Proposal for Employee Benefits Consulting Services.” Any proposal received after the stated closing time of 4:00 P.M. local time will be returned unopened. The United City of Yorkville reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted. During the evaluation process, the City reserves the right to request additional information or clarifications from the proposers, or to allow corrections of errors and omissions. The City may choose to interview the top proposers prior to making a final decision. All inquiries must be directed to Meghan Ostreko, Human Resources Manager, at mostreko@yorkville.il.us or 630-553-8531. 3 United City of Yorkville Request for Proposals: Employee Benefits Consulting Services 1. STATEMENT OF WORK A. In submitting this proposal, the bidder declares that the only persons or parties interested in the proposal as principals are those named herein; and that the proposal is made without collusion with another person, firm, or corporation. B. The bidder further declares that he or she has carefully examined the bid document; and that he or she waives all right to plead an y misunderstanding regarding the same. C. The bidder further understands and agrees that if this proposal is accepted, he is to furnish and provide all services necessary as specified in this agreement and in accordance with the requirements therein set forth. The bidder is responsible for all costs incurred in completing and submitting a proposal. D. The successful bidder further agrees to execute an agreement for this work to begin no later than January 1, 2014. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES A. The United City of Yorkville is located about 50 miles west of Chicago in Kendall County. The City employs approximately 70 full-time employees and 50 part-time em ployees across the following departments: Police, Public Works, Parks and Recreation, Community Developm ent, Finance, Administration and Library. Currently the City’s health insurance policies cover 87 subscribers for a total of 225 lives, including dependents. B. The City is seeking proposals for a broad range of benefit consulting services relating to employee benefits that include serving as broker and agent of record to coordinate its employee benefits program from reputable providers at competitive prices. The consultant will be expected to respond effectively to issues and concerns as they arise throughout the course of the agreement, and also to assist in providing creative solutions and approaches to problems, by acting proactively to improve the City’s emplo yee benefits program while trying to reduce the costs of the benefits. C. Current benefits that are offered b y the City include, but are not limited to, the following:  Health Insurance (Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois)  HMO 4  Two (2) High Deductible PPO Plans with a Health Reimbursement Arrangem ent (HRA)  Vision Insurance (EyeMed)  Dental Insurance (Guardian)  Life Insurance (Guardian)  Section 125  Employee Assistance Program D. It is anticipated that the consultant will provide the following services on an ongoing basis: i. Serve as the benefits consultant and assist the City in meeting its contractual obligations with its unions, and continued compliance with existing policies and laws. ii. Review existing benefit plans, policies, data, and other records as they pertain to emplo yee benefits, and provide the necessary guidance to make inform ed benefits decisions. iii. Negotiate with the insurance carriers all financial aspects of the insurance being provided to the City. iv. Assist in the evaluation of the City’s third part y administrator for its Section 125 plan (FSA) and Section 105 plan (HRA). v. Provide analysis of claims data, identify trends, and communicate areas of concern. vi. Assist in revising plan documents and alert City staff to changes in applicable laws or regulations. vii. Assist in the design/development/administration of comprehensive wellness activities geared toward improving employee health and controlling costs. viii. Assist in education and communications with employees regarding benefits developments as needed. ix. Provide consultation and advice to Administration and Finance staff as needed. x. Provide other related services as determined to be appropriate. 5 E. The City’s plan year commences on May 1st, in conjunction with the start of the City fiscal year. 3. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS A. The bidder shall submit the following minimum information in their proposal. Reponses to the following requests for information should be submitted in writing and identified by question number. These answers form an integral part of the proposal. B. Company Profile - Include a compan y profile and brief history including years in the insurance/benefit consulting business, company growth and retention, the size of the firm, the geographical range in which it operates, the number of employees and offices it has, the type of services it generall y provides, and the type of clients it has, including local government clients. Also include an ything that might make the company unique or provide added value to its clients. Also provide a summary of work completed with other municipalities/units of local government or private industry with employee benefit programs similar to the City’s. C. Staff Qualifications – Provide the name(s) of the consultant(s) to perform the work for the City and a brief statement as to wh y each consultant is qualified to provide services to the City. Identif y a reas of expertise, training, qualifications, and continuing education for each consultant. D. Provide docum entation of insurance producer license issued b y the State of Illinois or other licensures possessed by the consultant(s). Confirm the independency of the consultant(s) from any affiliation with any insurance compan y, third part y administrator agency, or provider network. E. References – The proposal shall include a list of four references of clients whom are being provided the sam e or similar type consulting services. The reference list shall include the t ype of work performed, the size of the client’s group and period of time retained as a client. For each client, provide the name, title, address, telephone number and email of a contact person that the City ma y contact as a reference. F. Describe the company’s vision of the relationship with the City in being its employee benefits consultant. How can the company help the City to evaluate the potential costs or savings resulting from various changes to benefit plans that may be considered? Describe any processes or tools that would be used in the evaluation. G. Describe how the City’s account will be managed b y your company, including if different consultants and/or departments will manage different aspects of the account. 6 H. Describe the compan y’s experience in working with union groups, especially labor-management committees. I. Detail the scope of services the company would offer and how the work will be accomplished. Include information about an y newsletter or other publications that are provided to clients or experience in reviewing information prepared b y clients. Provide sample copies. J. Outline the compan y’s ability to provide expertise and experience in the areas of health insurance benefit plan analysis and design by detailing its abilit y to advise clients on health care cost containment strategies. Provide examples of work completed for other clients and the end result of the effort. K. Describe the working relationships with health, dental and life insurance carriers. Explain to what extent you are willing to be involved in resolving problems with claims, etc., between an insured and the insurance carrier. Also des cribe working relationships with third part y administrators (TPA) of Section 125 (FSA) and Section 105 (HRA) plans and experience in undertaking an RFP process to evaluate and secure a TPA. Explain any existing or potential relationships between your compan y and insurance providers, TPA, or other vendors who might be considered by the City and that could lessen the company’s independence and objectivity because of a perceived or actual conflict of interest. L. Describe any other services, capabilities, designations, or experiences that differentiate the company from competitors. M. Explain the company’s training and education strategy to ensure that the latest and most accurate information is conveyed to its clients. N. Statement of Material Litigation - Provide a statement on whether or not the compan y is currently involved with any litigation material to providing consulting services, arbitration, or bankruptcy proceedings, or has been within the past three years directl y or indirectly. 4. COMPENSATION Please provide a complete description of the proposed basis for compensation for consulting services. If some or all of the proposed compensation will be in the form of commissions, please identify the source of the commissions, the expected amount of total commissions, and how the total commissions will be divided among various entities. If 7 some of the proposed compensation will be based on an hourly rate, please list the hourly rate for each type of service affected. If some contemplated services may require additional compensation, please state the basis for determining when the additional com pensation will be required and how the additional compensation will be calculated. The City will require complete disclosure of any and all fees, commissions, bonuses, overrides, or an y other compensation your com pany receives each year as a result of the services provided to the City. 5. PROPOSAL EVALUATION Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of which proposer meets the requirements of the United City of Yorkville. Criteria for the selection of the consultant will include the following: a demonstrated understanding of the work required b y the City as evidenced by a thorough proposal and the ability of the proposer to commence work in a timely m anner; the overall qualifications of the proposer; the scope and qualit y of services offered by the proposer; the ability to work with and have dem onstrated relationships with and access to major health, dental, vision and life insurance carriers and other vendors; and the recommendations from other organizations for which the proposer provides consulting services. The City Council will consider final acceptance of the proposal, under the recommendations of the Human Resources Manager, Finance Director and City Administrator. 6. SUBLETTING AGREEMENT It is mutually understood and agreed that the successful bidder shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or otherwise dispose of this agreement or his right, title or interest therein, or his power to execute such agreement, to any other person, firm or corporation without the previous written consent from the Human Resources Manager or her designee; but in no case shall consent relieve the successful bidder from his obligations or change the terms of the agreement. 7. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS Successful bidder shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and rules promulgated by any Federal, State, County, Municipal and/or other governmental unit or regulatory body now in effect or which may be in effect during the performance of work. Included within the scope of the laws, regulations and rules referred to in this paragraph, but in no way to operate as a limitation, are Occupational Safety and Health Act, Illinois Department of Labor, Department of Transportation, Worker’s Compensation Law, the Social Security Act of the Federal Government and any of its titles, the Illinois Department 8 of Human Rights, Human Rights Commission, or EEOC statutory provisions and rules and regulations. 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Successful bidder acknowledges that it is an independent contractor and that none of its employees, agents, or assigns are employees or agents of the City. Successful bidder shall make all unemployment, social security, and other payroll taxes required by law or union contract. 9. INDEMNITY/HOLD HARMLESS The selected Contractor shall indemnify and hold harmless the United City of Yorkville (“City”), its council members, officers, directors, agents, employees, representative and assigns, from lawsuits, actions costs (including attorney’s fees), claims or liability of any character, incurred due to the alleged negligence of the Contractor, brought because of any injuries or damages received or sustained by any person, persons or property on account of any act or omission, neglect of misconduct of said Contractor, its officers, agents and/or employees arising out of, or in performance of any of the provisions of the Contract Documents, including and claims or amounts recovered for any infringements of patent, trademark or copyright; or from any claims or amounts arising or recovered under the “Worker’s Compensation Act” or any other law, ordinance, order or decree. In connection with such claims, lawsuits, actions or liabilities, the City, its trustees, officers, directors, agents, employees, representatives and their assigns shall have the right to defense counsel of their choice. The Contractor shall be solely liable for all costs of such defense and for all expenses, fees, judgments, settlements and all other costs arising out of such claims, lawsuits, actions or liabilities. The Contractor shall not make any settlement or compromise of a lawsuit or claim, or fail to pursue any available avenue of appeal of any adverse judgment, with the approval of the City and any other indemnified party. The City or any other indemnified party, in its or their sole discretion, shall have the option being represented by its or their own counsel. If this option is exercised, then the Contractor shall promptly reimburse the City or other indemnified party, upon written demand, for any expenses, including but not limited to court costs, reasonable attorneys’ and witnesses’ fees and other expenses of litigation incurred by the City of other indemnified party in connection therewith. 10. TERMS OF AGREEMENT A. In submitting proposals, bidders must indicate that they are prepared to complete an agreement containing all the information submitted in their proposals. The successful bidder shall enter into a written agreement, which shall be subject to the approval of the Corporate Authorities of the City. Subject to the approval of the Corporate 9 Authorities these documents will allow for an initial period of 36-months. Final acceptance of a proposal shall onl y be com plete upon the Corporate Authorities acceptance of an agreement executed b y the successful bidder. B. The City may, at its sole discretion and without penalty, cancel or annul in whole or in part the agreement at any time with 30 days written notice to the successful bidder. The bidder shall receive payment for services provided up to the date of the cancellation or annulment. C. An extension period of two (2) additional years may be exercised upon mutual agreement between the Corporate Authorities of the City and the successful bidder. Not later than six (6) months prior to the expiration of the initial term, the successful bidder may submit a proposal for the renewal of the agreement. If the City and the successful bidder are unable to agree on mutually acceptable terms for a renewal term, the City shall be free to solicit bids or requests for proposals from other contractors for a new agreement, and the successful bidder shall be free to bid for such contract or submit its proposal, as the case may be. 10 CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATIONS The undersigned; A. Certifies that it is not barred from bidding or contracting with the City as a result of a violation of either Paragraph 33E-3 or 33E-4 of Act 5, Chapter 720 of the Illinois Complied Statutes regarding criminal interference with public contracting, and B. Swears under oath that it is not delinquent in the payment of any tax administered by the Illinois Department of Revenue as required by Chapter 65, Act 5, paragraph 11-42.1 of the Illinois Complied Statutes, and C. States that is has a written sexual harassment policy as required by the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/2-105(A) (4) a copy of which shall be provided to the City upon request, and D. Agrees to comply with the requirements of the Illinois Human Rights Act regarding Equal Employment Opportunities as required by Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775 ILCS 5/2-105) D. Agrees to comply with the civil rights standards set forth in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as mandated in Executive Order No. 11246, U.S.C.A. Section 2000e n.114 (September 24, 1965) All work under this contract shall be executed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and City laws, ordinances, rules and regulations which may in any manner affect the performance of this contract. Dated: ____________________ Contractor: _______________________________ By: ___________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: See attached memo. Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number PC #1 Tracking Number PC 2013-07 Grande Reserve Amended Annexation Agreement City Council – September 24, 2013 8/13/2013 Public hearing Two thirds majority Approval Consideration of a second amendment to the Grande Reserve annexation agreement regarding the payment of school transition fees. Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Approval of an annexation agreement amendment that records a land-cash agreement between the School District and Castle Bank on the property. Background This item was last discussed at the August 13th City Council meeting. Since that meeting, the City has been working with Castle Bank to revise the language in the annexation agreement and the hold harmless agreement to meet their requirements to be able to sell the debt certificate. The revised annexation agreement amendment is attached in a track changes and clean format. There are a few minor changes to the annexation agreement, none of which substantially change the content of the agreement. They are all clarifications of the existing obligations. The hold harmless agreement has been scrapped. Attorney Orr and Attorney Grant had been discussing the details of the hold harmless agreement for a few weeks, and ultimately couldn’t come to an agreement on a hold harmless agreement that gave the City any further protection for the existing obligations related to the land-cash fees in the 2009 agreement. Ultimately, Attorney Orr felt that the City had already committed to not reducing the number of units in the subdivision and to guaranteeing that the transition fees would be collected by the City and forwarded to a third party. Castle Bank did not want to hold the City harmless if we accidentally or purposefully failed to collect the fees or approved an amended land-use plan that reduced the number of units in the subdivision, without consulting the debt certificate holder. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the second amended annexation agreement. Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: September 19, 2013 Subject: Grande Reserve Annexation Agreement Second Amendment -1- SECOND AMENDMENT TO ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Grande Reserve Subdivision) This Second Amendment to Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (this “Second Amendment”) is made as of the ____ day of SeptemberAugust, 2013, by the United City of Yorkville, a municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois (the “City”) and Grande Reserve (Chicago) ASLI VI, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership (“Owner” or “Current Owner”), owner of the vacant lots, and other real estate incidental to the development thereof, in the Grande Reserve Development, as more fully set forth in Exhibit “A” on the Plat of Annexation, attached to the hereinafter defined Original Agreement and referred to therein as the “SUBJECT PROPERTY”. WHEREAS, on July 22, 2003, MPI-2 Yorkville North LLC, MPI-2 Yorkville Central LLC and MPI-2 Yorkville South I LLC (collectively, the “Original Owners”) and the City made and entered into that certain Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “Original Agreement”), recorded as Document No. 200300032964 in the Office of the County Recorder of Kendall County, Illinois, to govern the annexation and development of the community commonly known as Grande Reserve situated in the City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois; WHEREAS, on December 10, 2004, the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 (the “School District”), authorized the execution of that certain Debt Certificate, Series 2004 dated December 15, 2004 in the face amount of $4,685,960 (the “Debt Certificate”) to Castle Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) in order to provide funds to construct a new grade school to serve the Grande Reserve Subdivision in the City; WHEREAS, on December 13, 2004, the Original Owners and the School District entered into that certain “Annexation Agreement Amendment – Land/Cash Donation Agreement”, which was intended to amend the Original Agreement, and is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (the “2004 Agreement”); WHEREAS, on October 13, 2009, the City passed Ordinance 2009-54, which approved that certain Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees from Grand Reserve Subdivision, Yorkville, Illinois attached hereto as Exhibit 2 (the “Assignment”); WHEREAS, the 2004 Agreement is executed by only the Original Owners and the School District, and not by the City, which acknowledges the existence of the 2004 Agreement, views the 2004 Agreement as if it had been signed by the City, and has been acting in accordance with its terms; WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was subsequently amended by that certain First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) entered into as of January 30, 2012, by the City and Quality Properties Asset Management Company, an Illinois corporation, as successor to the Original Owners (the “Successor Owner”); -2- WHEREAS, the Original Agreement, the First Amendment and this Second Amendment, together with any future amendments, are collectively referred to herein as the “Annexation Agreement”; WHEREAS, the City, the School District, and the Current Owner desire to actually and properly amend the Annexation Agreement to reflect the intentions of the 2004 Agreement; WHEREAS, this Second Amendment is made pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-1, et seq.; and, WHEREAS, prior to the date of this Second Amendment all public hearings were held upon proper notice and/or publications as are required for the City to affect the terms of this Second Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Current Owner agree as follows: 1. Exhibit H1 is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: “School Contribution. The school contribution was satisfied by the Original Owners and no further contributions of property shall be required of the Current Owner or any successor owner of the SUBJECT PROPERTY other than the Transition Fees described below. Transition Fee. The owner of each dwelling unit (“Unit”) on the SUBJECT PROPERTY shall pay a school transition fee in an amount equal to Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) per Unit (the “Transition Fee”). Each Transition Fee is a contribution of money as described in 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-2(d). The number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY shall not be less than 2,080 Units. The Transition Fee shall be paid to the School District on a per Unit basis at any time prior to issuance of a building permit for that Unit by the City. The School District shall provide satisfactory evidence to the City each time it receives a payment of a Transition Fee, which evidence shall indicate which Unit the Transition Fee was paid for. Absent such evidence from the School District, the City shall not issue a building permit for the applicable Unit. The City, School District and the Current Owner (as defined in the Second Amendment to this Agreement) acknowledge that as of the date of the adoption of the Second Amendment to this Agreement, the Transition Fees have been paid for 441 Units for a total of $1,323,000 with a balance due of $4,917,000 to be paid on the next 1,639 Units (1,639 Units x $3,000 = $4,917,000). The Transition Fees must be paid until the Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units has been received collectively by Castle Bank, N.A., in its capacity as holder of the Debt Certificate, any successor holders of the Debt Certificate and their respective successors and assigns as holders of the Debt Certificate (each, a “Certificate Holder”). -3- Disposition of Payments. All payments of Transition Fees shall be transferred directly to the Certificate Holder, when and as received (but not less than monthly) by either the School District or the City, and shall be applied to the outstanding balance of the Debt Certificate which is comprised of principal of and interest on the Debt Certificate. The School District and the City hereby agree that neither the School District nor the City shall make any agreements with the current or future mortgage holder or holders of mortgages encumbering the SUBJECT PROPERTY, or with the current or future owners of any portion of the SUBJECT PROPERTY, or any current or future developers of the SUBJECT PROPERTY, from which the Transition Fees are to be received, which will in any way reduce the amount of the Transition Fees, reduce the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY to below 2,080 Units or modify or amend the terms or mode of payment of the Transition Fees. Amendments to Exhibit “H1”. This Exhibit “H1” may not be amended or modified without the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder. 2. The City received an Application For Amendment dated May 31, 2013, to amend the Annexation Agreement, Exhibit “H1” and to approve and confirm an understanding by and between the Original Owners and the School District. 3. The City and the Current Owner hereby acknowledge and accept the terms of the 2004 Agreement, and agree to act in accordance with, and to be bound by, the terms thereof in the same way and to the same extent as if they were a party and duly authorized signatory thereto. 4. The City and the School District hereby acknowledge and reaffirm the terms of the Assignment, and agree to continue to act in accordance with, and to be bound by, the terms thereof. 5. In the event the terms of this Second Amendment conflict with the Original Agreement, the First Amendment, the 2004 Agreement, and/or the Assignment, this Second Amendment shall control. 6. Section 11. is hereby amended by adding the following sentence as the last sentence of Section 11.: OWNERS, DEVELOPER, CITY and School District shall each comply with the provisions of Exhibit “H1”. 7. Section 24. F. is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: F. Agreement. This Agreement and any Exhibits or attachments hereto, may be amended from time to time in writing with the consent of the parties, pursuant to -4- applicable provisions of the City Code and Illinois Compiled Statutes; provided however, that the parties can only amend the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement if they first obtain the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”). This Agreement may be amended by the CITY and the owner of record of a portion of the SUBJECT PROPERTY as to provisions applying exclusively thereto, without the consent of the owner of other portions of the SUBJECT PROPERTY not affected by such Agreement; provided however, that the parties can only amend the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement if they first obtain the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”). Prior written consent of the Certificate Holder as described in the preceding two sentences shall no longer be required for an amendment to this Agreement if the Certificate Holder has received Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units as further described in Exhibit “H1” and Exhibit “A”. 8. Section 24. A is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: A. Third Party Beneficiary and Enforcement. The Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”) is a third party beneficiary to this Agreement with respect to the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement; provided, however, that the Certificate Holder will no longer be a third party beneficiary upon receipt of the Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units as further described in Exhibit “H1” and Exhibit “A”. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the Circuit Court of Kendall County by any of the parties or their successors or assigns and by the Certificate Holder, as a third party beneficiary by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the performance of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois. 9. Section 24 B. is amended by deleting the phrase “a empty lot or” in the last sentence of Section 24. B. -5- 9.10. Section 24 I. is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: I. Term of Agreement. The Term of this Agreement shall be twenty (20 years). In the event construction is commenced within said twenty year-period all of the terms of this Agreement shall remain enforceable despite said time limitation, unless modified by written agreement of the CITY and DEVELOPER/OWNERS; provided however that the CITY and DEVELOPER/OWNERS may not modify the Term of this Agreement with respect to the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY, Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder. 10. This Second Amendment shall be in full force and effect as of the date first written above. -6- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to the Original Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal Corporation By: _______________________________________ Mayor Attest: _________________________________ City Clerk GRANDE RESERVE (CHICAGO) ASLI VI, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership By: Avanti Properties Group II, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership, its general partner By: Avanti Management Corporation, a Florida corporation, its general partner By: Name: Andrew Dubill Title: Vice President Attest: __________________________________ -7- JOINDER OF COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 115 Yorkville Community Unit School District No. 115 (the “School District”) has executed this Second Amendment in order to confirm the School District agrees to be bound by the terms of this Second Amendment and if, or to the extent, any of the foregoing matters agreed to in this Second Amendment requires the consent of the School District in order for such agreements to be binding and enforceable in accordance with their terms, such consent is hereby given. “SCHOOL DISTRICT” COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 115 Yorkville, Illinois Date: ________________ By: _________________________________ Tim ShimpDr. Thomas D. Engler, Superintendent -8- EXHIBIT 1 LAND/CASH DONATION AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 13, 2004 See attached. -9- EXHIBIT 2 ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES See attached. Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2013-_____ ORDINANCE APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Grande Reserve Subdivision) WHEREAS, on July 22, 2003, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”) and MPI-2 Yorkville North LLC, MPI-2 Yorkville Central LLC and MPI-2 Yorkville South LLC (collectively, the “Original Owners”) entered into a certain Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “Original Agreement”), recorded as Document No. 200300032964 in the Office of the County Recorder of Kendall County, Illinois, to govern the annexation of land and the development of approximately 2,080 dwelling units within the community to be known as the “Grande Reserve Subdivision” situated in the City of Yorkville, Kendal County, Illinois; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Original Agreement, the Original Owners contributed acres of land to enable the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 (the “School District”) to construct a new grade school to serve the Grand Reserve Subdivision and further agreed to pay a transition fee of $3,000 per dwelling unit (the “Transition Fee”) , which would be used to repay a debt certificate issued by the School District to finance the costs of the construction of the new grade school; and, WHEREAS, on October 13, 2009, the City passed Ordinance 2009-54 which approved a certain Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees to be derived from the dwelling units to be constructed in Grand Reserve Subdivision to the holder of the debt certificate and agreed not to enter into any agreements which would reduce, modify or amend the mode of payment of the Transition Fee; and, WHEREAS, Grande Reserve (Chicago) ASLI VI, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership (the “Current Owner”) is the successor to the interests of the Original Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 2 Owners and have requested the City to restate its commitment not to issue a building permit for a dwelling unit in the Grand Reserve Subdivision without evidence of payment in full of the Transition Fee and the transfer of said fee to the holder of the debt certificate; not to reduce, modify or amend the amount or mode of payment of the Transition Fee without the consent of the holder of the debt certificate; not to reduce the total number of platted dwelling units in the Grand Reserve Subdivision from a total of 2080; and, also to acknowledge that the holder of the debt certificate is a third party beneficiary to these commitments; and, WHEREAS, the City is prepared to agree to confirm its commitments regarding the collection and of the Transition Fee as set forth in the Second Amendment to the Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement in the form attached hereto and made a part hereof, upon NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, that the Second Amendment to Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (Grand Reserve Subdivision) in the form attached hereto is hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and deliver said Second Amendment. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ________ day of ____________________, 2013. _______________________________ CITY CLERK Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 3 ROSE ANN SPEARS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ CARLO COLOSIMO ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ LARRY KOT ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of _______________ 2013. _______________________________ MAYOR -1- SECOND AMENDMENT TO ANNEXATION AGREEMENT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Grande Reserve Subdivision) This Second Amendment to Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (this “Second Amendment”) is made as of the ____ day of September, 2013, by the United City of Yorkville, a municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois (the “City”) and Grande Reserve (Chicago) ASLI VI, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership (“Owner” or “Current Owner”), owner of the vacant lots, and other real estate incidental to the development thereof, in the Grande Reserve Development, as more fully set forth in Exhibit “A” on the Plat of Annexation, attached to the hereinafter defined Original Agreement and referred to therein as the “SUBJECT PROPERTY”. WHEREAS, on July 22, 2003, MPI-2 Yorkville North LLC, MPI-2 Yorkville Central LLC and MPI-2 Yorkville South I LLC (collectively, the “Original Owners”) and the City made and entered into that certain Annexation Agreement and Planned Unit Development Agreement (the “Original Agreement”), recorded as Document No. 200300032964 in the Office of the County Recorder of Kendall County, Illinois, to govern the annexation and development of the community commonly known as Grande Reserve situated in the City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois; WHEREAS, on December 10, 2004, the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 (the “School District”), authorized the execution of that certain Debt Certificate, Series 2004 dated December 15, 2004 in the face amount of $4,685,960 (the “Debt Certificate”) to Castle Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”) in order to provide funds to construct a new grade school to serve the Grande Reserve Subdivision in the City; WHEREAS, on December 13, 2004, the Original Owners and the School District entered into that certain “Annexation Agreement Amendment – Land/Cash Donation Agreement”, which was intended to amend the Original Agreement, and is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (the “2004 Agreement”); WHEREAS, on October 13, 2009, the City passed Ordinance 2009-54, which approved that certain Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees from Grand Reserve Subdivision, Yorkville, Illinois attached hereto as Exhibit 2 (the “Assignment”); WHEREAS, the 2004 Agreement is executed by only the Original Owners and the School District, and not by the City, which acknowledges the existence of the 2004 Agreement, views the 2004 Agreement as if it had been signed by the City, and has been acting in accordance with its terms; WHEREAS, the Original Agreement was subsequently amended by that certain First Amendment (the “First Amendment”) entered into as of January 30, 2012, by the City and Quality Properties Asset Management Company, an Illinois corporation, as successor to the Original Owners (the “Successor Owner”); -2- WHEREAS, the Original Agreement, the First Amendment and this Second Amendment, together with any future amendments, are collectively referred to herein as the “Annexation Agreement”; WHEREAS, the City, the School District, and the Current Owner desire to actually and properly amend the Annexation Agreement to reflect the intentions of the 2004 Agreement; WHEREAS, this Second Amendment is made pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-1, et seq.; and, WHEREAS, prior to the date of this Second Amendment all public hearings were held upon proper notice and/or publications as are required for the City to affect the terms of this Second Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Current Owner agree as follows: 1. Exhibit H1 is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: “School Contribution. The school contribution was satisfied by the Original Owners and no further contributions of property shall be required of the Current Owner or any successor owner of the SUBJECT PROPERTY other than the Transition Fees described below. Transition Fee. The owner of each dwelling unit (“Unit”) on the SUBJECT PROPERTY shall pay a school transition fee in an amount equal to Three Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($3,000.00) per Unit (the “Transition Fee”). Each Transition Fee is a contribution of money as described in 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-2(d). The number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY shall not be less than 2,080 Units. The Transition Fee shall be paid to the School District on a per Unit basis at any time prior to issuance of a building permit for that Unit by the City. The School District shall provide satisfactory evidence to the City each time it receives a payment of a Transition Fee, which evidence shall indicate which Unit the Transition Fee was paid for. Absent such evidence from the School District, the City shall not issue a building permit for the applicable Unit. The City, School District and the Current Owner (as defined in the Second Amendment to this Agreement) acknowledge that as of the date of the adoption of the Second Amendment to this Agreement, the Transition Fees have been paid for 441 Units for a total of $1,323,000 with a balance due of $4,917,000 to be paid on the next 1,639 Units (1,639 Units x $3,000 = $4,917,000). The Transition Fees must be paid until the Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units has been received collectively by Castle Bank, N.A., in its capacity as holder of the Debt Certificate, any successor holders of the Debt Certificate and their respective successors and assigns as holders of the Debt Certificate (each, a “Certificate Holder”). -3- Disposition of Payments. All payments of Transition Fees shall be transferred directly to the Certificate Holder, when and as received (but not less than monthly) by either the School District or the City, and shall be applied to the outstanding balance of the Debt Certificate which is comprised of principal of and interest on the Debt Certificate. The School District and the City hereby agree that neither the School District nor the City shall make any agreements with the current or future mortgage holder or holders of mortgages encumbering the SUBJECT PROPERTY, or with the current or future owners of any portion of the SUBJECT PROPERTY, or any current or future developers of the SUBJECT PROPERTY, from which the Transition Fees are to be received, which will in any way reduce the amount of the Transition Fees, reduce the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY to below 2,080 Units or modify or amend the terms or mode of payment of the Transition Fees. Amendments to Exhibit “H1”. This Exhibit “H1” may not be amended or modified without the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder. 2. The City received an Application For Amendment dated May 31, 2013, to amend the Annexation Agreement, Exhibit “H1” and to approve and confirm an understanding by and between the Original Owners and the School District. 3. The City and the Current Owner hereby acknowledge and accept the terms of the 2004 Agreement, and agree to act in accordance with, and to be bound by, the terms thereof in the same way and to the same extent as if they were a party and duly authorized signatory thereto. 4. The City and the School District hereby acknowledge and reaffirm the terms of the Assignment, and agree to continue to act in accordance with, and to be bound by, the terms thereof. 5. In the event the terms of this Second Amendment conflict with the Original Agreement, the First Amendment, the 2004 Agreement, and/or the Assignment, this Second Amendment shall control. 6. Section 11. is hereby amended by adding the following sentence as the last sentence of Section 11.: OWNERS, DEVELOPER, CITY and School District shall each comply with the provisions of Exhibit “H1”. 7. Section 24. F. is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: F. Agreement. This Agreement and any Exhibits or attachments hereto, may be amended from time to time in writing with the consent of the parties, pursuant to -4- applicable provisions of the City Code and Illinois Compiled Statutes; provided however, that the parties can only amend the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement if they first obtain the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”). This Agreement may be amended by the CITY and the owner of record of a portion of the SUBJECT PROPERTY as to provisions applying exclusively thereto, without the consent of the owner of other portions of the SUBJECT PROPERTY not affected by such Agreement; provided however, that the parties can only amend the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement if they first obtain the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”). Prior written consent of the Certificate Holder as described in the preceding two sentences shall no longer be required for an amendment to this Agreement if the Certificate Holder has received Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units as further described in Exhibit “H1” and Exhibit “A”. 8. Section 24. A is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: A. Third Party Beneficiary and Enforcement. The Certificate Holder (as defined in Exhibit “H1”) is a third party beneficiary to this Agreement with respect to the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY (as described in Exhibit “H1”), Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement; provided, however, that the Certificate Holder will no longer be a third party beneficiary upon receipt of the Transition Fees for all 2,080 Units as further described in Exhibit “H1” and Exhibit “A”. This Agreement shall be enforceable in the Circuit Court of Kendall County by any of the parties or their successors or assigns and by the Certificate Holder, as a third party beneficiary by an appropriate action at law or in equity to secure the performance of this Agreement. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois. 9. Section 24 B. is amended by deleting the phrase “a empty lot or” in the last sentence of Section 24. B. -5- 10. Section 24 I. is hereby stricken in its entirety and replaced with the following: I. Term of Agreement. The Term of this Agreement shall be twenty (20 years). In the event construction is commenced within said twenty year-period all of the terms of this Agreement shall remain enforceable despite said time limitation, unless modified by written agreement of the CITY and DEVELOPER/OWNERS; provided however that the CITY and DEVELOPER/OWNERS may not modify the Term of this Agreement with respect to the Transition Fee, the number of Units on the SUBJECT PROPERTY, Exhibit “H1”, Exhibit “A”, Section 11 of this Agreement, Section 24 of this Agreement and any other provisions of this Agreement which could affect the amount of Transition Fees the Certificate Holder is to receive under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Certificate Holder. 11. This Second Amendment shall be in full force and effect as of the date first written above. -6- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to the Original Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville, an Illinois municipal Corporation By: _______________________________________ Mayor Attest: _________________________________ City Clerk GRANDE RESERVE (CHICAGO) ASLI VI, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership By: Avanti Properties Group II, L.L.L.P., a Delaware limited liability limited partnership, its general partner By: Avanti Management Corporation, a Florida corporation, its general partner By: Name: Andrew Dubill Title: Vice President Attest: __________________________________ -7- JOINDER OF COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 115 Yorkville Community Unit School District No. 115 (the “School District”) has executed this Second Amendment in order to confirm the School District agrees to be bound by the terms of this Second Amendment and if, or to the extent, any of the foregoing matters agreed to in this Second Amendment requires the consent of the School District in order for such agreements to be binding and enforceable in accordance with their terms, such consent is hereby given. “SCHOOL DISTRICT” COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 115 Yorkville, Illinois Date: ________________ By: _________________________________ Tim Shimp, Superintendent -8- EXHIBIT 1 LAND/CASH DONATION AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 13, 2004 See attached. -9- EXHIBIT 2 ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES See attached. STATE OF ILLINOIS ss. COUNTY OF KENDALL ) Ordinance No. 2009- ISy ORDINANCE APPROVING ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES FROM GRANDE RESERVE SUBDIVISION AND NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, on December 10, 2004, the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 (the "School District"), authorized the execution of a Debt Certificate in the amount of$4,685,960 to Castle Bank,N.A. (the"Debt Certificate")to provide funding to construct the new grade school to service the Grande Reserve Subdivision ("Grande Reserve") in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, i Illinois(the"City"); and, j WHEREAS, debt service on the Debt Certificate was payable solely from school transition fees collected pursuant to the City Code and certain annexation agreements in connection with the development of Grande Reserve and not from any other source; and, WHEREAS, as of June 1, 2009, there is an approximate balance due o the Debt Certificate of 3,750,000; however, there were insufficient funds available from said transition fees to pay all of the principal and interest due and owing as of said date; and, WHEREAS, Castle Bank, N.A. has requested assurances from the School District and the City that all future transition fees, in the current scheduled amounts, whether paid to the School District or the City be immediately forwarded directly to Castle Bank, N.A. to be applied by Castle Bank, N.A. toward the interest and principal due and owing on the Debt Certificate and the School District and the City believe that such assurances should be made to Castle Bank,N.A. as requested NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois that the Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees From Grande Reserve Subdivision, Yorkville, Illinois, by and between the Board of Trustees of Yorkville Community School District 115 and the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, and the Notice of Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees, Grande Reserve Subdivision, both documents being attached hereto as an Exhibit and being made a part hereof; are hereby approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute said Assignment and Notice of Assignment and to direct that all transition fees collected by the City be immediately forwarded to Castle Bank, N.A. as required by said Assignment. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. i Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this 16- day of p geJ. ,A.D. 2009. ROBYN SUTCLIFF GEORGE GILSON,JR. ARDEN JOE PLOCHER C — DIANE TEELING I GARY GOLINSKI MARTY MUNNS ROSE SPEARS WALLY WERDERICH APPROVED by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this 161 day of C-/0 E2 ,A.D. 2009. QiAU2' :3 Mayor Attest: i C1 C 2 ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES FROM GRAND RESERVE SUBDIVISION,YORKVILLE,ILLINOIS WHEREAS, on December 10, 2004, the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 (the"School District"), authorized the execution of a Debt Certificate in the amount of$4,685,960 to Castle Bank,N.A. (the"Debt Certificate")to provide funding to construct the new grade school to service the Grand Reserve Subdivision ("Grand Reserve") in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois(the"City");and, WHEREAS, debt service on the Debt Certificate was payable solely from school transition fees collected pursuant to the City Code and certain annexation agreements in connection with the development of Grand Reserve and not from any other source; and, WHEREAS, as of June 1, 2009, there is an approximate balance due o the Debt Certificate of 3,750,000; however, there were insufficient funds available from said transition fees to pay all of the principal and interest due and owing as of said date; and, WHEREAS, Castle Bank, N.A. has requested assurances from the School District and the City that all future transition fees, in the current scheduled amounts, whether paid to the School District or the City be immediately forwarded directly to Castle Bank, N.A. to be applied by Castle Bank, N.A. towardI i the interest and principal due and owing on the Debt Certificate. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the Trustees of Yorkville Community School District No. 115 and the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville,Kendall County,Illinois,agree as follows: 1.All school transition fees incident to the development of the Grande Reserve in the current scheduled amounts required by the terms and provisions of certain annexation agreements to be received either by the School District or by the City shall be transferred directly to Castle Bank,N.A., as the registered owner of the Debt Certificate, or its successor, when and as received either by the School District or by the City. I 2.The School District and the United City of Yorkville hereby agree that neither the School District nor the United City of Yorkville shall make any agreements with the current mortgage holder or holders of mortgages against real estate situated in Grande Reserve or with the current owners of any portion of the real estate, or any future developers of the real estate, from which the transition fees are to be received,which will in any way reduce the amount of the transition fees,modify or amend the terms or mode of payment,without the express written consent of the Castle Bank,N.A. 3.The real estate affected by the pledge of transition fees is legally described in the ordinance annexing the properties comprising Grande Reserve and recorded as Document No. 200300032965 with the Kendall County Recorder of Deeds. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Notice of Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees on the day and date set opposite their respective signatures. COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 115 Yorkvil ois 1 Date: By: Dr. Thomas Engler, Sup tendent UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS Date: j 011c, O 9 By: Mayor Attest: I e V:\Castle.GrandReserve.Assigmnent.doc 2 STATE OF ILLINOIS SS COUNTY OF KENDALL ) NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES GRANDE RESERVE SUBDIVISION YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE is herewith given that, on December 15, 2004, Community Unit School District No. 115, Yorkville, Illinois, issued a certain Debt Certificate, Series 2004, in the Face Amount of 4,685,960.00, bearing interest as set forth in the Debt Certificate. CASTLE BANK, a National Association, maintaining one of its principal offices at 109 West Veterans Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois, is the Registered Owner of said Debt Certificate, Series 2004. The Debt Certificate is a special, limited obligation of the School District and is payable solely from transition fees paid to the District from developers and builders of residences in the Grande Reserve Subdivision, which revenues have been assigned and pledged to the payment of the Debt Certificate. The amount of said transition fees are set forth in and are established pursuant to the Ordinances of the United City of Yorkville and the terms and provisions of a certain Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement entered into by the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, with the developers of the Grande Reserve Subdivision. The real estate affected thereby and affected hereby is described in a certain Ordinance of the City entitled Ordinance No. 2003-45, ORDINANCE ANNEXING PROPERTIES OF MPI-2 YORKVILLE NORTH, L.L.C., MPI-2 YORKVILLE CENTRAL, L.L.C., AND MPI YORKVILLE SOUTH, L.L.C. (DEVELOPERS), SUBURBAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY TRUST #74-3216, ISENSTEIN-PASQUINELLI, L.L.C., MOSER ENTERPRISES, INC., INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P., DALE KONICEK AND WAYNE AND LOIS KONICEK OWNERS) TO THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS GRANDE RESERVE), filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds of Kendall County, Illinois, on September 11, 2003, as Document No. 200300032965. This Notice is made, given and recorded to confirm and memorialize the following: 1) All school transition fees incident to the development of the Grande Reserve Subdivision, Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, in the current scheduled amounts required by the terms and provisions of the Annexation Agreement received either by the School District or by the United City of Yorkville shall be paid directly to CASTLE BANK, N.A., the registered owner of the Debt Certificate, or its successor, when and as received either by the School District or by the City. 2) The School District and the United City of Yorkville have covenanted and agreed with CASTLE BANK, N.A., that neither the School District nor the United City of Yorkville will make any agreements with the current mortgage holder or holders of mortgages against real estate situated in the Grande Reserve Subdivision or with the current owners of any portion of the real estate, or any future developers of the real estate, from which the transition fees are to be received, which will in any way reduce the amount of the transition fees, modify or amend the terms or mode of payment, without the express written consent of the Bank. 3) Upon request, CASTLE BANK, N.A., or its successor, shall issue a Release in recordable form, evidencing the payment of the transition fee as to each lot in the Grande Reserve Subdivision when and as the transition fee, for each lot, is received by the Bank. J 4) The real estate affected by the pledge of transition fees is legally described in the Ordinance Annexing the properties comprising Grande Reserve Subdivision recorded as Document No. 200300032965. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Notice of Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees on the day and date set opposite their respective signatures. COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 115 Yorkville, Illinois BY: Date: Z d D . tliomas Engler, Superin ndent UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS BY: 2 Y -L-.'LI Date: Mayor Attest: Date: CpUr`l City Clerk CASTLE BANK,N.A. BY: Date: e— L c1 g! Stan Fre egional President U:I Castle.GrandeReserve.Notice.doc ILA' 301130(-:p0'2 :L (&C2 PREPARED BY & RETURN TO: tv: 4:3 10 tr.t _T tr: Thomas W. Grant KENDALL_ COUNTY, j:i_ Attorney at Law RECORDED: 10/7/2009 9:42 AM PO Box 326 NOT: 59.00 RHSPS FEE: 10.00 Yorkville, IL 60560 PAGES: 14 630) 553-0088 RECORDING COVER SHEET NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES GRANDE RESERVE SUBDIVISION YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS STATE OF ILLINOIS SS COUNTY OF KENDALL ) NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND PLEDGE OF TRANSITION FEES GRANDE RESERVE SUBDIVISION YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE is herewith given that, on December 15, 2004, Community Unit School District No. 115, Yorkville, Illinois, issued a certain Debt Certificate, Series 2004, in the Face Amount of 4,685,960.00, bearing interest as set forth in the Debt Certificate. CASTLE BANK, a National Association, maintaining one of its principal offices at 109 West Veterans Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois, is the Registered Owner of said Debt Certificate, Series 2004. The Debt Certificate is a special, limited obligation of the School District and is payable solely from transition fees paid to the District from developers and builders of residences in the Grande Reserve Subdivision, which revenues have been assigned and pledged to the payment of the Debt Certificate. The amount of said transition fees are set forth in and are established pursuant to the Ordinances of the United City of Yorkville and the terms and provisions of a certain Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement entered into by the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, with the developers of the Grande Reserve Subdivision. The real estate affected thereby and affected hereby is described in a certain Ordinance of the City entitled Ordinance No. 2003-45, ORDINANCE ANNEXING PROPERTIES OF MPI-2 YORKVILLE NORTH, L.L.C., MPI-2 YORKVILLE CENTRAL, L.L.C., AND MPI YORKVILLE SOUTH, L.L.C. (DEVELOPERS), SUBURBAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY TRUST #74-3216, ISENSTEIN-PASQUINELLI, L.L.C., MOSER ENTERPRISES, INC., INLAND LAND APPRECIATION FUND, L.P., DALE KONICEK AND WAYNE AND LOIS KONICEK OWNERS) TO THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS GRANDE RESERVE), filed for record in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds of Kendall County, Illinois, on September 11, 2003, as Document No. 200300032965. This Notice is made, given and recorded to confirm and memorialize the following: 1) All school transition fees incident to the development of the Grande Reserve Subdivision, Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, in the current scheduled amounts required by the terms and provisions of the Annexation Agreement received either by the School District or by the United City of Yorkville shall be paid directly to CASTLE BANK, N.A., the registered owner of the Debt Certificate, or its successor, when and as received either by the School District or by the City. 2) The School District and the United City of Yorkville have covenanted and agreed with CASTLE BANK, N.A., that neither the School District nor the United City of Yorkville will make any agreements with the current mortgage holder or holders of mortgages against real estate situated in the Grande Reserve Subdivision or with the current owners of any portion of the real estate, or any future developers of the real estate, from which the transition fees are to be received, which will in any way reduce the amount of the transition fees, modify or amend the terms or mode of payment, without the express written consent of the Bank. 3) Upon request, CASTLE BANK, N.A., or its successor, shall issue a Release in recordable form, evidencing the payment of the transition fee as to each lot in the Grande Reserve Subdivision when and as the transition fee, for each lot, is received by the Bank. 4) The real estate affected by the pledge of transition fees is legally described in the Ordinance Annexing the properties comprising Grande Reserve Subdivision recorded as Document No. 200300032965. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Notice of Assignment and Pledge of Transition Fees on the day and date set opposite their respective signatures. COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 115 Yorkville, Illinois BY: Date: Engler, ndent UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS BY: Date: Mayor Attest: Date:J'.0q IDEPur City Clerk CASTLE BAY,N.A. BY: Date: Stan UeK,Regional President Attached is a copy of the legal description for the subject real estate, derived from the Annexation Agreement. U 1 Castle.GrandeReserve.Notice.doc STEINBRECHER FARM B" Central Annexation Parcel PARCEL TWO: THAT PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 11 AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 442 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO,BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD;THENCE NO 75 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 1728 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LIN O E SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 0 SECO S ST 1001.25 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11 TO THE SO NER OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE NORTH 89 DEG S U SECONDS EAST 1339.5 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTI OUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF TI 11;THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 971.5 FE ENTERLINE OF THE HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 15 MINUTES V,,5EC S 727.2 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE;THENCE NORTH 79 DEGR 1 U SECONDS WEST 2877.4 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE CEN TH AND SOUTH HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 7 DEGREES 7 MINU S O ST 364.8 FEET ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID NORTH AND SOUTH HIG TH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 503.33 FEET TO TH T OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 0 SECOND O G SAID WEST LINE 1327.6 FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;EXCEPT P SAID PARCEL LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LI E OF CHICAGO,BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRIS L, COUNTY,ILLINOIS. I N A n J 9„O A 2 O 4 p J .o A 1 INLAND" Annexation Parcel THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,THAT PART OF SECTION 14,AND THAT PART OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD WITH THE SOUTHERLY.LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILRO GHT-OF-WAY THROUGH SAID SECTION 14;THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 2 S ONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 1239.61 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF TH HWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14;THENCE NORTH 68 DEGRE>= 04 MIN 0 E NDS EAST,ALONG SAID NORTH LINE,610.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST N ORTHWEST QUARTER;THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 54 MINUTE ST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11 1 OF 1329.33 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAl QUARTER;THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WE L S ST LINE,611.01 FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON AD;THENCE NORTH 73 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EA T, N OUTHERLY LINE,837.66 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF MILL ROAD;TH S DEGREES 18 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 546. T EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11;THENCE 0 REE 19 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE,556.17 FE S UTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;THENCE SOUTH 01 D UTES 08 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QU T R ID SECTION 14,A DISTANCE OF 1122.0 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 87 DEG 4 S 51 SECONDS WEST,438.0 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BDIVISION,EXTENSION FOUR;THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 45 MIN S E S WEST.ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID j LYNWOOD SUED N FOUR,1168.80 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;TH NC O EGREE 46 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE WESTERLY OF L O SUBDIVISION,EXTENSIONS FOUR AND FIVE,1173.80 FEET TO AN IRON TH E SOUTH 01 DEGREE 47 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE WESTERL F YNW000 SUBDIVISION,EXTENSION FIVE,376.25 FEET TO AN IRON STAKE:T OUTH 02 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 46 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINES OF LYNWOOD SUBDIVISION,EXTENSIONS FIVE AND SIX,1950.62 FEET TO AN IRON STAKE;THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREE 51 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST,ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LYNWOOD SUBDMSION,EXTENSION SIX,879.29 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF U.S.ROUTE NO.34;THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 47 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 878.60 FEET;THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST,2106.30 FEET;THENCE NORTH 47 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST,1500.85 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD AND THE EASTERNMOST CORNER OF A TRACT DESCRIBED IN A QUIT CLAIM DEED TO GEORGE AND GLENNA PATTERSON,HUSBAND AND WIFE,RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO.72-375 ON JANUARY 25,1972;THENCE NORTH 25 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 236.34 FEET;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY AND NORTHERLY,A RADIUS OF 800.0 FEET;AN ARC DISTANCE OF 419.10 FEET;THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 531.08 FEET;.THENCE NORTH 05 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 1866.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. ALSO:ALL THAT PART OF ROUTE 34,KENNEDY ROAD AND MILL ROAD ADJOINING SAID PARCEL. 7 U SON i KONICEK" Annexation Parcel PARCEL NO 1: THAT PART OF SECTIONS FOURTEEN(14),FIFTEEN(15)AND TWENTY-THREE(23),ALL IN TOWNSHIP THIRTY-SEVEN(37)NORTH,RANGE SEVEN(7)EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF STRUKEL'S PARADISE LAKE UNIT NO..1, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTS E OF BRISTOL ROAD AND THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD),AS SHOWN ON THE S SION PLAT OF STRUKEUS PARADISE LAKE UNIT NO.1 RECORDED AS DOCUME 1-215;THENCE NORTH 60 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST,724.86 FEET ENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF 94 0 IUS CURVE TO THE LEFT;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 631.18 FEET ALON HOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 43 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 4 O THEPOINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE;THENCE NORTH 27 D E 1 UTES 21 SECONDS EAST 11.57 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A lNT E UTH 37 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 1776.45 FEET TO A P H 52 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 1343.89 FEET TO A POI LINE OF BRISTOL ROAD;THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 0C N S 1778.85 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE POINT OF BEG N PARCEL NO.2: THAT PART OF SECTIONS FOU EN TWENTY-THREE(23),ALL IN TOWNSHIP THIRTY-SEVEN(37)NORTH,RA SISV N(7)EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: J COMMENCING AT E R CORNER OF STRUKEL'S PARADISE LAKE UNIT NO.1, i SAID POINT ALS B T I RSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BRISTOL ROAD AND THE CENTERL NE ROAD),AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAT OF STRUKEL'S DIS E IT NO.1,RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 971-215;THENCE SOUTH 37 DE S 39 UTES 00 SECONDS EAST 1776.85 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF BRISTOL RO E POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE NORTH 52 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 00 SE S EAST 1343.89 FEET TO A POINT;THENCE SOUTH 37 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST 1645.23 FEET TO A POINT IN THE CENTERLINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 34;THENCE SOUTH 46 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST 1350.80 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 34 TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF BRISTOL ROAD;THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 1781.63 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF BRISTOL ROAD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL N0.3: THAT PART OF SECTIONS FOURTEEN(14)AND TWENTY-THREE(23),ALL IN TOWNSHIP THIRTY-SEVEN(37),NORTH,RANGE SEVEN(7)EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHERLY CORNER OF STRUKELS PARADISE LAKE UNIT NO.1, z A)SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENT-ERUNE OF BRISTOL ROAD AND F ATHECENTERLINEOFKENNEDYROAD),AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION PLAT OF STRUKEUS PARADISE LAKE UNIT NO.1,RECORDED AS DOCUMENT#71-215;THENCE 1 NORTH 60 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 26 SECONDS EAST 724.86 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A 1094T2 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO n THE LEFT;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY 631.18 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE WHOSE CHORD BEARS NORTH 43 DEGREES 46'MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST 822.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE;THENCE NORTH 27 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST 11.57 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 27.DEGREES 15 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST 551.92 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A POINT;THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 15 SECON 9S-EAST-4s04.1*fEET_ ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE TO A POINT;THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 56 a SECONDS EAST 21 D4.69 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE TO A POINT IN THE CENTERLINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 34;THENCE SOUTH 46 DEGREES 33 MINUTES 17 SECONDS WEST 652.28 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERL.INE TO A POINT;THENCE NORTH 37 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST 3421.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO:ALL THAT PART OF ROUTE 34,KENNEDY ROAD AND BRISTOL RIDGE ROAD ADJOINING SAID PARCELS. O O G a i f Y STEINBRECHER FARM A" Parcel for Zoning Map PARCEL ONE: THAT PART OF SECTIONS 15,22 AND 23,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 15 WITH THE TANGENT OF THE CENTERLINE TATE AID ROUTE 20 AS ESTABLISHED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 12, 195 DOCUMENT 125479; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID TANGENT 185.32 F CE SOUTH 17 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST TO T C R F SAID STATE AID ROUTE 20;THENCE SOUTH 17 DEGREES 20 M NOS EAST 1303.46 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE 1 EGREES 20 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 113.8 FEET;THENCE SOUT S 08 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 428.4 FEET;THENCE NORTH 17 G E S UTES 0 SECONDS WEST 1370.9 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE i TE 20;THENCE NORTH 81 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 0 SECON 10 CENTERLINE 25426 FEET TO A POINT 194.7 FEET EASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ERIC S D SION;THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERL F D ERICKSON'S SUBDIVISION,462 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY PARAL E CENTERLINE OF SAID ROAD 194.7 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF D B MSION;THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO TH CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION;THENCE WESTERLYALONG T Y LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND SAID LINE EXTENDED 178 . F T INT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF 1 5;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 0 SECONDS ST D WEST UNE 904 FEET;THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 03 MINUTES ON ST 1629 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 36 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EET;THENCE SOUTH 39 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 3776.7 F THE CENTERLINE OF U.S.ROUTE 34;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 1353 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF UNIT THREE,RIVER RIDGE;THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID UNIT THREE,RIVER RIDGE AND ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF UNIT TWO,RIVER RIDGE 2686 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID UNIT TWO,RIVER RIDGE;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID UNIT TWO,RIVER RIDGE AND ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF UNIT ONE,RIVER RIDGE 824.42 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF STATE AID ROUTE 20;THENCE NORTHWE§TERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 1886.5 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN NORTH 69 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 1084.7 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. EXCEPT FROM SAID PARCEL THAT PART LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STRUKEUS PARADISE LAKE UNIT 1;THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY 2 LINE OF SAID STRUKEL'S PARADISE LAKE UNIT 1,BEING THE CENTERLINE OF BRISTOL RIDGE ROAD,ON A BEARING OF NORTH 37 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST WHICH IS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THE DESCRIPTION OF THIS LINE,A DISTANCE OF 215.76 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 47 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST 54.82 FEET;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 445.4-fF,1^T, -.AXINGA.._._„ CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 64 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 354.19 FEET;THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 36 SECONDS F WEST 49.79 FEET;THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST 33.60 FEET;THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 31.16 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 46 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 02 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 18.07 FEET;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 340.28 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 77 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 16 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 126.72 FM;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NOR T,HAVING A RADIUS OF 442.47 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORT REES 26 MINUTES 27 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 164.23 FE T;T H 53 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 04 SECONDS WEST 36.90 FEET;THE AR ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH,HAVING A 51 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 78 DEGREES 44 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 65.15 FEET;THENCE SO TH 05 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST 122.26 FEET;THENCE WEST ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE RADTOTHENORTH,HAVING A IUS HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 79 DEGREES 06 MIN TUT S O WEST,A DISTANCE OF 298.16 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG TH RVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 150.96 FE VI A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 86 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 36 S ST,A DISTANCE OF 122.05 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 16 MIN 3 CONDS WEST 45,04 FEET,THENCE SOUTH 71 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 5 C DS WEST 135.54 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 04 MINUTE 1 S WEST 46.27 FEET;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A R VE TO THE NORTHWEST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 165.37 FEET,HAVING ING OF SOUTH 78 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 25 SECONDS S , CE OF 144.66 FEET;THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 26 MINUTES CO ST 180.59 FEET;THENCE NORTH 65 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 38 E WEST 30.99 FEET;THENCE NORTH 50 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 59 SECONDS S .50 FEET,THENCE NORTH 82 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST 133.31 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 69 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST 67.58 FEET;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH,HAVING A RADIUS OF 188.30 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 166.22 FEET;THENCE NORTH 53 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST 69.55 FEET;THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST,HAVING A RADIUS OF 187.57 FEET,HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 73 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 21 SECONDS WEST,A DISTANCE OF 164.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST 112.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 21.13 FEET,MORE OR LESS,TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL,SAID POINT BEING 1,272.16 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD AS MEASURED ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE,FOR THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE. ALSO INCLUDING:ALL THAT PART OF BRISTOL RIDGE ROAD AND KENNEDY ROAD, ADJOINING SAID PARCEL,AND NOT PREVIOUSLY ANNEXED BY ANY MUNICIPAUTY. t t f i 0 TUCEK"Annexation Parcel THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2,PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11 AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION ENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 21 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF I ECT10N 12,99.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST 26 .2 EET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID. O 1 236.28 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWES U E NORTH 89 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST ALONG 236.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUAR ORT4489 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH 0 ORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11,2028.27 FEET TO THE NS S LY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 1 OF STORYBOOK HIGHLANDS,A S I SECTION 11;THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREE 06 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EA ENDED LINE 1030.0 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 37 S 239.40 FEET;THENCE NORTH 1 DEGREE 06 MINUTES 53 SECONOS TO THE CENTERLINE OF CANNONBALL TRAIL;THENCE NORTH 66 DEGREE 09 IN 20 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 898.31 FEET;THENC RLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE,BEING ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT IUS OF 2290.82 FEET,A DISTANCE OF 495.34 FEET;THENCE NORTH 53 DEG S INUTES EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 654.29 FEET TO THE EAST LINE O D N 2;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST ALONG ID E 262.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,IN THE TOWNSHIP OF B T A COUNTY,ILLINOIS. I ALSO:ALL THAT A L ROAD ADJOING SAID PARCEL.EXCEPT THEREFROM ANY r PART PREVI USL BY ANY MUNICIPALITY, A v iL f` I f! HANDKE" Annexation Parcel THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER 2029.92 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 5 OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTHER ALONG SAID AS FAST LINE 1469.90 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF MILL ROAD;THENCE ETERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 1039.40 FEET TO A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED T6,CbtAMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BY TRUSTEIES DEED RECORDED JUNE 28,1973 NT 73-3089;THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE 1 .36 EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;THENCE NORTHERLY ALO 1 E 1489.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN BRISTOL TOWNSHIP,KENDAL ILLINOIS. ALSO:ALL THAT PART OF MILL ROAD ADJOINING ID 0 1 G1 til F1 i STEINBRECHER FARM B" North Annexation Parcel PARCEL TWO: THAT PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 11 AND PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 442 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO,BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD;THENCE NO H 75 DEGREES 17 MINUTES D0SECONDSEAST1728FEETALONGSAID.RIGHT OF WAY LINT THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 0 SECO ST 1001.25 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF.SAID SECTION 11 TO THE SO C ER OF THE WEST HALF OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE NORTH 89 OEG ES 1 SECONDS EAST 1339.5 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SEC OUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF S i 11;THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 977.5 F NTERLINE OF THE HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 74 DEGREES 15 MINUTES EC DS 727.2 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE;THENCE NORTH 79IDEGR SECONDS WEST 2877.4 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE CEN E TH AND SOUTH HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 7 DEGREES 7 MIN S C EAST 364.8 FEET ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID NORTH AND SOUTH HIG A E RTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 503.33 FEET TO TH S OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 0 SECOND LO G SAID WEST LINE 1327.6 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING(EXCEPT 7 F RIGHT OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAI OA ING THROUGH SECTION 11 AFORESAID AND ALSO EXCEPT THE FO LLO N BED PREMISES:THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NOR R OF SECTION 14,-TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THI P i L ERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I COMMENCIN AT ST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14;THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG'TH ST L E F ID SECTION 14,7.5 FEET FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SO H LY NG SAID WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 14,434.5 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE O 1 OF WAY OF THE CHICAGO,BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD;THEN ..75 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST 876 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH RIGH OF WAY LINE TO THE CENTER OF THE BRISTOL-AURORA ROAD; THENCE NORTH 8 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 21211 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND 7.5 FEET SOUTH OF AND NORMALLY DISTANT FROM THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14;THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE 812.5 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,AND ALSO EXCEPT THAT PART DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF.SAID SECTION 14;THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 14,A DISTANCE OF 442.0 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD(FORMERLY THE CHICAGO,BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD);THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD A DISTANCE OF 876 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING;THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD,A DISTANCE OF 849.68 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14 BEING ALSO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE CONTINUING NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD,A DISTANCE OF 2419.37 FEET TO". THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,A DISTANCE OF 197.04 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID LINE WITH A LINE DRAWN 190 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF,MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO,AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RAILROAD; I THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE,A DISTANCE OF 3189.33 FEET THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11,BEING ALSO THE NORTH4JNEEOF SAIDSECTION 14; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALA-EL LINEE,,,/A DISTANCE OF i.M •r' 107.78 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF KENNEDY ROAD;THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ROAD,A DISTANCE OF 191.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING),IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL,KENDALL COUNTY,ILLINOIS. ALSO EXCEPT FROM SAID PARCEL THAT PART LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD. PARCEL THREE: THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 1 ' PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11,TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,RANGE 7 OF THE-THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN,DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SECTION LINE 79 OUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10(SAID POINT BEING IN THE CE ERRY CREEK);THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID E NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE•SOUTHEAST Q F ID SECTION 10;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 0 SEC S. ST L G SAID NORTH LINE 239 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE S k OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10;THENCE NO R MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EIGHTY LINE 638.3 FEET TO E THE ROAD;THENCE SOUTH 67 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST AL . ERLINE OF SAID ROAD 304 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 74 DEGREES 38 MINUTES O ST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 451.7 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 DEGREES SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 600.7 FEET TO A LINE DRAWN P D 6$FEET WEST OF,AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES THERETO,THE SE N N ,THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST 66 F G PARALLEL LINE 502.2 FEET;THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47 MINUTE EAST 393.33 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SCHOOL PROPERTY;T C U 7 EGREES 7 MINUTES 0 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST j LINE OF THE S 12 .8 FEET TO'THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE S S Q ER OF SAID SECTION 11;THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES ON T ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 342.33 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER O N HWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 11; THENCE SOU REES 52 MINUTES 0 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SECTION LINE 1248.6 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING,IN THE TOWNSHIP OF BRISTOL,KENDALL COUNTY,_ILLINOIS. ALSO:ALL THAT PART OF MILL ROAD,KENNEDY ROAD AND GALENA ROAD ADJOINING SAID PARCELS. l Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number PC #2 Tracking Number PC 2013-12 & PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville (Yorkville Christian School) – Amended Annexation Agreement City Council/September 24, 2013 9-10-13 Discussion Majority Vote Request for amendment to an existing Annexation Agreement & Final Plat approval for a proposed new Christian high school. Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble Community Development Name Department At the direction of the City Council during the August 27, 2013 meeting, staff facilitated a meeting between the Petitioners, John and Michelle Stewart, and the neighboring property owner to the east and south, the Blocks, on September 16th to discuss the items regarding the proposed private Christian high school brought before the council by the Blocks’ attorney. During that meeting, attorneys, engineers and legal counsel for the Petitioner, the Blocks and the City were present. The following is a summary of the issues discussed: Ashley Road Offsite Storm Sewer Currently, Unit 1 and certain portions of Unit 2 of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision storm water management facilities are constructed. An existing 10” drain tile is located downstream of an existing basin east of the proposed school which drains along the west ditch of Ashley Road and eventually passes to the east side of the road . The existing 10” drain tile has recently been reconnected to the downstream field tile system so that all “low flow” discharges of storm water are carried below the surface, while overland flows currently remain unchanged. In 2006, there were discussions between the previous developer and the Blocks to disconnect and abandon the use of the 10” drain tile and construct an offsite storm sewer as part of Unit 2 development. This proposed storm sewer would carry low flow storm water under ground to alleviate any overland nuisance flows to adjacent tributary properties downstream. The offsite storm sewer will be designed to terminate at the grass waterway southwest of the property to an unnamed creek which flows to the Middle Aux Sable Creek. Staff fully supports the construction of the offsite storm sewer now, rather than upon final plat of Unit 2, which the Petitioner has agreed to complete. However, the construction of the offsite storm sewer will require easements to be obtained from the Blocks to allow for the installation and future maintenance. At the conclusion of the meeting on September 16th, the proposed width of the easement was still being negotiated between the Blocks and the Petitioner. Should the petitioner and the Blocks not reach a resolution with regards to the easement dedication, the Petitioner has the right to discharge the flows to the existing historical location. It is staff’s opinion that the finalization of the easement dedication should not hinder the approval of the proposed final plat of subdivision or amended annexation agreement. Traffic Impact Study As proposed, there are three (3) roadway and intersection improvements to be constructed as part of the Yorkville Christian School subdivisi on - Ashley Road; Ashley Road/Route 126; and Penman/Route 126. Per the meeting on September 16th, all parties agreed that the following improvements are appropriate and sufficient to address the increased traffic associated with the proposed new school land use: Ashley Road – improvements to this township roadway will include a right turn lane into the subdivision with a City recommended speed reduction on Ashley Road along the subdivision’s frontage from 55 mph to 45 mph due to the anticipated traffic and vehicular Memorandum To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: September 18, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Request for Annexation Agreement Amendment & Final Plat trips generated from the school land use. Other roadway improvements include milling and resurfacing of Ashley. Ashley will have a rural cross section with minimum 11’ drive lines for a total 22 feet wide section from edge to edge with 2’-0” wide aggregate shoulders. Ashley Road/ Route 126 – per IDOT’s preliminary comments, westbound left turn lanes and eastbound right turn lanes are now proposed for this intersection. A revised traffic impact study has been prepared by KLOA regarding the recommended turn lanes on Route 126. Ashley Road at the intersection at Route 126 will also have a northbound left turn lane and northbound right turn lane. Approximately, 2,800 square foot triangular section of proposed IDOT right-of-way would need to be dedicated by the Blocks for the identified Ashley Road improvements. This commitment was presented to the Blocks during the meeting as a necessity to meet the State’s roadway requirements and address the safety concerns expressed by the Blocks themselves. Penman Road/Route 126 – per IDOT’s preliminary comments, a westbound left-turn lane will be provided on Route 126 at the intersection of Penman and an eastbound right turn lane as well as the separate northbound left and northbound right turn lanes on Penman similar to the Ashley Road/Route 126 improvements. Although the traffic impact study plans for full build -out of the proposed school and residential subdivision as part of the ultimate traffic improvements along Route 126, the petitioner plans to make the improvements immediately during the 2014 construction season prior to the occupancy permit for the school so that the surrounding areas are impacted less by the initial influx of the school’s students. The City also intends to withhold occupancy of any residential building permit until the completion of the required roadway improvements, per IDOT’s prior request. The full construction of the roadway improvements and enhancements to Route 126 will also aid in providing additional safety measures to this corridor. Accessory/Ancillary Uses The permitted accessory uses proposed by the Petitioner as part of the Yorkville Christian School facility, equestrian/riding arena and retail store, have been more defined in the language within the draft Amended Annexation Agreement. As now proposed, these accessory/ancillary uses will read: Retail store, not to exceed 3,000 sq. ft. to be located completely within the school building; selling school supplies, plants and produce grown on the property, and spirit wear. Plants and produce may be sold seasonally outside. Equestrian/riding arena; temporary stabling used solely for intramural and extramural sports and tournaments defined as programming between students of the Yorkville Christian School and other high schools in sanctioned division, region, state or national competitions. All such ancillary and accessory uses are limited to those stated a bove and are subject to the current United City of Yorkville zoning regulations. Additional Revisions to Amended Annexation Agreement Per the discussion at the August 27, 2013 City Council meeting, the following additional revisions to the draft amended annexation agreement have been addressed: 1. Final Plat: The petitioner has submitted a revised Final Plat of Subdivision plan which satisfactorily completes the comments No.# 60-63 prepared by the City Engineer, EEI, provided in a letter dated September 5, 2013. 2. Park Site: The Petitioners have agreed to construct a paved area at a size and in a location of the City’s choosing to accommodate vehicular parking and receive credit for such an improvement against the land cash contribution upon evidence of paid invoices for the actual cost of construction. 3. Fees and Charges: The attached revised fee sheet (Exhibit C) for the new Ashley Pointe Subdivision reflects a water connection fee of $3,700, the current rate for a single family home. 4. Land Cash: Per the direction of the City Council, the revised valuation of an improved acre of land for the residential portion of the proposed Ashley Pointe subdivision will be $30,000 based upon review of the Petitioner’s Land Appraisal study and the City’s recent appraisal of land value in the Yorkville area completed in 2012. a. The fees for Unit 1 will be paid per the current land-cash ordinance at one-third (1/3) within 30 days of City’s invoice, one-third (1/3) due one year from City Council approval, and one-third (1/3) due two years from City Council approval. b. The timing for Unit 2 payment of land cash will follow the current ordinance requirement of 1/3 at final plat of approval, 1/3 at time of first occupancy, and 1/3 due at time of infrastructure acceptance. Staff Comments: Staff believes that the meeting between the petitioner and adjoining neighbor was fruitful in the discussion regarding off site storm sewer and traffic improvements. The outstanding items to be negotiated between the two parties, easement acquisition for storm sewer and roadway dedication for future right-of-way, should not impede the City’s ability to vote on the proposed final plat of subdivision or amended annexation agreement. Furthermore, the additional language provided to the draft agreement relating to the accessory/ancillary uses on the school property clearly defines the limitations of these activities on the site. Attachments: 1. Ordinance Amended Annexation Agreement 2. Ordinance Sub Final Plat 3. Proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement from KFO (attached) 4. Ordinance 2005-30 Original Annexation Agreement 5. Exhibit A revised Legal Description 6. Exhibit B Final Plat - Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision date last revised 09/09/13 prepared by HR Green 7. Exhibit C Fee Sheet 8. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Exhibit illustrating the proposed removed 84 single-family lots marked “FOR REFERENCE ONLY” dated 07/2/13 prepared by HR Green. 9. Overall Master Plan – Bubble Plan, dated 08-22-13, prepared by HR Green 10. Yorkville Christian School – Vicinity Plan by HR Green 11. EEI Letter to the City dated July 23, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 1 12. EEI Letter to the City dated July 29, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan review No. 1 – Additional Comments 13. EEI Letter to the City dated August 14, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Plat Review No. 2 14. EEI Letter to the City dated September 5, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan review No. 2 15. EEI Letter to the City dated September 18, 2013 re: Final Plat Review 16. Memorandum from Director of Parks and Recreation to City Council dated August 8, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Subdivision. 17. Petitioner’s Appraisal Report dated August 20, 2013 prepared by Krueger Appraisal Services, Inc. 18. Land Valuation Study For: Cash Contribution in-Lieu-of Site Dedication United City of Yorkville, Illinois dated May 1, 2012 prepared by David W. Phillips & Company. 19. Traffic Impact Study dated August 28, 2013, prepared by KLOA 20. Revised Traffic Impact Study dated September 18, 2013, prepared by KLOA 21. Storm Sewer Design Report latest revision dated August 22, 2013 prepared by HR Green 22. Route 129 Improvements plans, dated 08-26-08, prepared by HR Green 23. Ashley Offsite Storm Sewer plans, dated 02-17-06, prepared by HR Green previously approved by City and County. 24. Ashley Road Easements, dated 08-23-06, prepared by HR Green 25. Landscape Plans dated 08-22-13, prepared by Hitchcock Design Group. 26. Staff memo to City Council dated August 21, 2013 re: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Public Hearing for Annexation Agreement Amendment Request 27. Staff memo to City Council dated September 5, 2013 re: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School request for Annexation Agreement Amendment & Final Plat 28. Staff memo to City Council dated September 5, 2013 re: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Final Plat Approval 29. Copy of Petitioners’ Amended Annexation Agreement Application w/attachments 30. Copy of Petitioners’ Final Plat Application w/attachments Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2013-_____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT OF YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT – PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION (Yorkville Christian School) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the “City”) is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, the City and John and Michelle Stewart (the “Owner”), as successors to the original owners, desire to amend the Annexation Agreement, to provide for the resubdivision of Lot 358 for a private high school, amend the required donations and contributions and seek exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the Mayor and City Council (the “Corporate Authorities”) on the amended annexation agreement on August 27, 2013, and all notices required by law have been given by the City and Owner; and, WHEREAS, the statutory procedures provided in Section 11-15.1-1 of the Illinois Municipal Code for the execution of the amended annexation agreement have been fully complied with; and, WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have concluded that the approval and execution of the proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement is in the best interests of the health, safety, and welfare of the City. WHEREAS, the City and Owner desire to proceed in accordance with the terms and conditions as set forth in the First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2: The First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development and the City of Yorkville (Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision) attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A is hereby approved; and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver same. Section 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 2 Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this ________ day of ____________________, 2013. ______________________________ CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ CARLO COLOSIMO ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ LARRY KOT ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of _______________ 2013. ______________________________ MAYOR Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2013-_____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, APPROVING THE RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 358 OF THE PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT 1 FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION (YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SUBDIVISION) WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville (the “City”) is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and, WHEREAS, John and Michelle Stewart (the “Petitioner”) have filed an application and petition for approval of the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision for the subdivision of Lot 358 in Prestwick of Yorkville, Unit 1, an approximately 32 acre property for a private high school; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission convened and held a public hearing on the 25th day of July, 2013, to consider the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision after publication of notice and notice to property owners within five hundred (500) feet of the Subject Property; and, WHEREAS, the Plan Commission reviewed the standards set forth in Chapter 3 and 4 of Title 11 of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance and made a recommendation to the Mayor and City Council (“the Corporate Authorities”) for approval of the subdivision and the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Section 1: The above recitals are incorporated herein and made a part of this Ordinance. Section 2: That the Corporate Authorities hereby approve the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision, prepared by HR Green dated August 6, 2013, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A; with such amendments as are required pursuant to the City Engineer’s letter dated September 5, 2013, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit B; and authorize the Mayor, City Clerk, City Administrator and City Engineer to execute said Plat. Section 3: The City Clerk is hereby authorized pursuant to Section 11-2-3.H of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance to file a copy of this ordinance and Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Final Plat of Subdivision with the Kendall County Recorder of Deeds within 30 days from the date of the approval of this Ordinance. Section 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Ordinance No. 2013-____ Page 2 Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this ________ day of ____________________, A.D. 2013. ______________________________ CITY CLERK ROSE ANN SPEARS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ CARLO COLOSIMO ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ LARRY KOT ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of _______________ 2013. ______________________________ MAYOR 157226/3 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SS COUNTY OF KENDALL ) FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT OF YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT AND THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION) This First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement (the “AMENDMENT”), is made and entered into this day of , 2013, by and between the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, a municipal corporation (the “CITY”), and the owner of record John Stewart and Michelle Stewart, (“OWNER” or “DEVELOPER” or “OWNER/DEVELOPER”). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, OWNER owns fee simple title to the real property which is legally described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, consisting of approximately 190 acres, more or less (hereinafter “PROPERTY”); WHEREAS, on April 26, 2005, the CITY annexed and zoned the PROPERTY in an R-2 Single Family Residence District in accordance with the terms of the “Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development and The United City of Yorkville” (“AGREEMENT”); WHEREAS, the original owner and developer under the Agreement was unable to complete the development of the PROPERTY; WHEREAS, the Final Plat for Unit 1 of the Property was recorded and the improvements required under Unit 1 were substantially completed; WHEREAS, the Final Plat for Unit 2 was not recorded; WHEREAS, the OWNER/DEVELOPER subsequently acquired the PROPERTY, described in Exhibit “A” to the AMENDMENT; WHEREAS, the OWNER/DEVELOPER desires to amend the AGREEMENT to provide for a re-subdivision of Lot 358 for a private high school; amend the donations and contributions; and seek other exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance; WHEREAS, R-2 Zoning under the CITY’s ordinances allows for a school as a permitted use; 157226/3 2 WHEREAS, all notices required by law relating to this AMENDMENT have been given to the persons or entities entitled thereto, pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the CITY have duly fixed the time for a public hearing on this AMENDMENT and pursuant to legal notice have held such hearing thereon all as required by the provisions of the Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities have duly held all public hearings relating to AMENDMENT all as required by the provisions of the CITY’s Ordinances and Illinois Compiled Statues; WHEREAS, in accordance with the powers granted to the CITY by the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15.1-1 through 15.1-5 (2002), inclusive, relating to annexation agreements, the parties hereto wish to enter into this binding AMENDMENT of the AGREEMENT and to provide for various other matters related directly or indirectly to amending the annexation of the PROPERTY, as authorized by, the provisions of said statutes; WHEREAS, pursuant to due notice and publication in the manner provided by law, the Plan Commission of the CITY have had such public hearing and have taken all further action required by the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/11-15-1.3 (2002) and the ordinances of the CITY relating to the procedure for authorization, approval and execution of the subdivision of Lot 358 by the CITY. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements and conditions herein contained, and by authority of and in accordance with the aforesaid statutes of the State of Illinois, the parties agree as follows: 1. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT. OWNER has filed with the Clerk of the CITY a duly and properly executed Application to Amend Annexation Agreement pursuant to, and in accordance with the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/7-1-1 et seq. (2002). CITY agrees to adopt any necessary ordinances to amend the AGREEMENT as soon as reasonably practical. To the extent there is a conflict between the terms of the AMENDMENT and the AGREEMENT, the terms of the AMENDMENT shall control. 2. ZONING. That said paragraph be amended as follow: A. PROPERTY shall be developed in substantial compliance with the ordinances of the CITY in effect at the time of passage of this AMENDMENT to AGREEMENT except as modified by said AMENDMENT. B. The CITY shall approve the revised final plat of subdivision of Lot 358 in Prestwick of Yorkville, Unit 1, prepared by HR Green dated July 2, 2013, last revised September 9, 2013, attached hereto as Exhibit B,. 157226/3 3 3. Paragraph 5 DONATIONS AND CONTRIBUTIONS. be amended as follows: A. DEVELOPER shall receive a credit against all City and County road impact fees for the improvements by the DEVELOPER to Il Route 126 at Penman Road, Ashley Road and Route 126 intersection and Ashley Road improvements adjacent to the PROPERTY. B. DEVELOPER shall pay revised school and park land-cash fees or provide land dedication as required under the terms of this AMENDMENT and Exhibit C attached hereto. 4. Paragraph 6 SECURITY INVESTMENTS. Amend by providing an additional paragraph to read as follows: OWNER/DEVELOPER has provided CITY with a Subdivision Bond for the Prestwick Subdivision in the amount of One-Million Eight-Hundred Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Eighty-Four and 00/100’s Dollars ($1,879,684.00). CITY agrees to reduce said bond so as not to bond for street parkway/trees and public side-walk improvements. CITY agrees to instead obtain any surety needed for such improvements from the builder of the home on each lot. Developer will provide any required security for the high school improvements, including roadways. 5. Paragraph 9 AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCES. Amend to read as follows: CITY agrees to amend the five (5) years where referenced throughout said paragraph to ten (10) years, said ten (10) years commencing from the approval date of this AMENDMENT. 6. Paragraph 11 FEES AND CHARGES. Shall be revised as follows: Notwithstanding the provisions of the AGREEMENT the fees due and owing to the CITY for those fees and amounts shall be set forth in the revised Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part of this AMENDMENT. The Owner acknowledges that the donations contained in this Agreement, and the City Code, are made voluntarily by the OWNER, and the OWNER hereby waives for itself and its successors and assigns the right to contest at any time in the future, the validity or the amount of the donations. 7. Paragraph 18 NOTICES AND REMEDIES. Shall be amended as follows: City Attorney: Kathleen Field-Orr & Associates 53 W. Jackson Boulevard, Suite 964 Chicago, Illinois 60604 157226/3 4 Developer: John Stewart and Michelle Stewart 3874 N. IL Route 71 Sheridan, IL 60118 Developer Attorney: John F. Philipchuck Dommermuth, Cobine, West, Gensler, Philipchuck, Corrigan and Bernhard, Ltd. 111 E. Jefferson Ave., Suite 200 Naperville, IL 60540 Telephone: 630-355-5800 Facsimile: 630-355-5976 8. Paragraph 22 GENERAL PROVISIONS. H. Term of Agreement Shall be amended as follows: The term of this AGREEMENT shall be twenty (20) years. In the event that a permit for construction is issued within said twenty-year period all of the terms of this AGREEMENT for that permit shall remain enforceable despite said time limitation, unless modified by written agreement of the CITY and OWNER/DEVELOPER. 9. Add an additional paragraph 24. SCHOOL PROPERTY. OWNER/DEVELOPER intends to develop the re-subdivided Lot 358 to accommodate an approximately 32 acre site for a private high school. CITY agrees that the existing R-2 One- Family Residence allows as a permitted use schools; including denominational or private, elementary and high, including playgrounds, garages for school buses and athletic fields. In addition, the CITY agrees to permit the following accessory and auxiliary uses all as permitted uses: • Retail store, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, to be located completely within the school building and selling school supplies, plants and produce grown on the property, and spirit wear. Plants and produce may be sold seasonally outside. • Equestrian/riding arena; temporary stabling used solely for intramural and extramural sports and tournaments defined as programs between the students of Yorkville Christian School and other high schools in sanctioned division, region, state or national competitions • Electronic scoreboard; permanent and temporary sponsor signage; athletic field lighting; outdoor public address system • Outdoor parking and storage of farming machinery; grain bins; greenhouses • Concession/restroom buildings serving outdoor athletic venues • Perpendicular street parking along Mustang Way serving the athletic fields • School bus parking and garage 157226/3 5 All such ancillary and accessory uses are limited to those stated above and are subject to the United City of Yorkville zoning regulations. 10. Add an additional paragraph 25. PARKING FOR HIGH SCHOOL. CITY recognizes that the enrollment of the high school student population will increase slowly over time, therefore CITY agrees to allow the school to open with forty percent (40%) of the required parking in place and the remaining sixty percent (60%) to be land banked and installed as determined by the CITY. 11. Add an additional paragraph 26. DEVELOPMENT NAME CHANGE. CITY agrees to allow OWNER/DEVELOPER to change the name of the development to Ashley Pointe. 12. Add an additional paragraph 27. SITE DEVELOPMENT. CITY agrees to issue a site development permit to the DEVELOPER prior to final engineering approval, for mass grading work on the PROPERTY. CITY further agrees to issue, upon submittal and approval of the proper plans, a building foundation only permit on the proposed School Property. 13. Add an additional paragraph 28. PARK SITE DEVELOPER agrees to construct a paved area at a size, and in a location of the CITY’S choosing to accommodate vehicular parking on Lot 359, the future Park Site. DEVELOPER shall be given a credit against remaining park fees owed the CITY for the PROPERTY after the lot 359 Park Site dedication. . 157226/3 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands on this day of . 2013. CITY: OWNER/DEVELOPER: UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE JOHN STEWART AND MICHELLE STEWART By: _______________________________ _________________________________ Mayor Attest: ____________________________ _________________________________ City Clerk Prepared By: John F. Philipchuck Dommermuth, Cobine, West, Gensler, Philipchuck, Corrigan and Bernhard, Ltd. 111 E. Jefferson Ave., Suite 200 Naperville, IL 60540 630-355-5800 157226/3 7 EXHIBIT INDEX TO THE AMENDMENT EXHIBIT A REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT B FINAL PLAT EXHIBIT C FEES 157226/3 8 157226/3 9 157226/3 10 157226/3 11 157226/3 12 EXHIBIT C ASHLEY POINTE FEES PER UNIT A paid receipt from the School District Office, 602-A Center Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois, must be presented to the City prior to issuance of permit $3,000.00 Separate Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District fee – made payable to Y.B.S.D. $1,400.00 United City of Yorkville Fees 1. Building Permit Cost $650.00 plus $0.20 per square foot $650+$0.20(SF) 2. Water Connection Fees SF and DU $3,700 2+ Bed Att N/A 3. Water Meter Cost Detached Units $ 475 Attached Unit N/A 4. City Sewer Connection Fees $2,000 5. Water and Sewer Inspection Fee $ 25 6. Public Walks/Driveway Inspection Fee $ 35 7. Development Fees Public Works $ 700 Police $ 300 Building $ 150 Library (see note “d” below) $500 * $250 Parks & Recreation $50 Engineering $100 Bristol-Kendall Fire (see note “c” below) $1000 * $500 8. School Fees (see note “a” below) Apartment Townhome Duplex Single Family School N/A N/A N/A $1.792.68 157226/3 13 9. All Road Contributions N/A; to be satisfied by improvements to Penman/Rt. 126; Ashley Road/Rt. 126; and Ashley Road Improvements 10. Weather Warning Siren Fee (see note “b” below) $ 75/acre 11. Park Fees. a. Value per acre – $30,000 b. Acres required: 10.05 total acres 6.67 acres dedicated 3.38 acres unsatisfied c. Actual cost of paving parking lot as evidenced by paid invoices shall be deducted from total amount due. d. (i) Payment of one-third (1/3) of the amount due after credit for parking lot paving shall be due within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from the City; (ii) Payment of one-third (1/3) shall be due on the one year anniversary of the date of approval of this First Amendment by the City Council; and, (iii)Final one-third (1/3) payment shall be due on the second year anniversary of the date of approval of this First Amendment by the City Council. Notes: a. School fees are $1,792.68 per lot, payable at building permit. b. $75/acre x 193.81 = $14,535. $54.25/lot payable at building permit. c. 50% of BKFD fee for Unit 1 paid ($52,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1, (104) pay $500/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay $1,000/lot at building permit. d. 50% of library fee for Unit 1 paid ($26,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1 (104) pay $250.00/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay $500/lot at building permit. 157226/3 14 157226/3 15 157226/3 16 PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: UNIT ONE: LOTS 1 TROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 12 TROUGH 41, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 43 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 52 THROUGH 63, INCLUSIVE, LOT 65 THROUGH 108, INCLUSIVE, LOTS 357 THROUGH 363, INCLUSIVE, AND LOT 365 IN PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT 1, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 3 & 10, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 31, 2006, AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 200600035287, IN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. UNIT 2: THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 10, 1776.14 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 258.23 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 38 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 30 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST, 269.09 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 283.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 68 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 262.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST, 0.59 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 54 DEGREES 36 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 35.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 48 SECONDS EAST, 70.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 265.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 14 DEGREES 09 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 0.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 145.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, 61.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, 37.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76 DEGREES 49 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 116.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST, 153.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST, 112.02 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 111.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES 23 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, 55.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, 90.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST, 88.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 08 SECONDS EAST, 85.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 10 SECONDS EAST, 238.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 16 SECONDS EAST, 13.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 288.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 127.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 267.00 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH 22 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST, AN ARC LENGTH OF 46.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 23 SECONDS EAST, 216.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 02 SECONDS EAST, 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, 106.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 86.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 11 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST, 72.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 05 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST, 71.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST, 71.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 77.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 80.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 34 MINUTES 17 SECONDS EAST, 87.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, 106.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, 52.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST, 84.51 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, 74.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, 1006.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LANDS CONVEYED TO ROBERT M. AND ELAINE E. STEWART BY DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LANDS PER DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656, 2655.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS PER DOCUMENT NO. 72-5656, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, AND 1876.91 FEET SOUTHERLY OF (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID WEST LINE) THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 10, 1876.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF KENDALL, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND CONTAINING 110.29 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS. S01°27'28"E 202.68' S8 8 ° 3 2 ' 3 2 " W 40 . 0 3 ' L= 3 9 . 2 7 ' R = 2 5 . 0 0 ' CB = N 4 6 ° 2 7 ' 2 3 " W C H = 3 5 . 3 6 ' S8 8 ° 3 2 ' 3 6 " W 94 . 6 5 ' L= 1 1 2 . 3 2 ' R = 3 8 5 . 0 0 ' CB = N 8 3 ° 0 5 ' 5 7 " W C H = 1 1 1 . 9 2 ' L= 2 9 . 4 6 ' R = 2 5 . 0 0 ' CB = S 7 1 ° 2 9 ' 4 6 " W C H = 2 7 . 7 9 ' L = 3 4 0 . 2 7 ' R = 3 3 3 . 0 0 ' C B = S 6 7 ° 0 0 ' 2 6 " W C H = 3 2 5 . 6 6' N8 3 ° 4 3 ' 1 0 " W 2 8 6 . 2 5 ' L = 2 7 2 . 0 0 ' R = 9 6 7 . 0 0 ' C B = S 8 8 ° 13 ' 2 0 " W C H = 2 71.11' S 8 0 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 2 4 3 . 9 4 ' L=571.20'R=333.00'CB=N50°41'46"WCH=503.70'N01°33'23"W 227.23'L =3 6 1 .3 8 'R =7 1 7 .0 0 'C B =N 1 5 °5 9 '4 4 "W C H =3 5 7 .5 7 'N30°26'05"W 174.10'L =2 6 1 .1 9 'R =3 3 5 .0 0 'C B =N 8 °0 5 '5 6 "W C H =2 5 4.62'70.00'S75°45'48"E L=142.07' R=265.00'CB=N29°35'43"E CH=140.38'38.46'N41°58'22"E 113.75'N44°57'14"E L=39.27' R=25.00'CB=N89°57'14"E CH=35.36'S44°57'14"W150.00'102.54'S49°49'48"E80.00'S55°49'25"E94.23'S64°04'50"E257.25'S62°30'12"E 10 0 . 1 5 ' S6 8 ° 1 1 ' 2 3 " E 11 7 . 5 5 ' S8 4 ° 0 3 ' 4 4 " E S28°1 5 ' 0 3 " E 1 9 3 . 1 1 ' 1 1 9 . 6 5 ' N 7 7 ° 4 6 ' 2 8 " E 1 1 9 . 6 5 ' N 5 7 ° 2 6 ' 4 6 " E 12 5 . 3 6 ' N3 6 ° 3 7 ' 3 7 " E L =2 6 7 .4 0 'R =3 3 3 .0 0 ' CB=S 5 °14 '4 7 "E C H =2 6 0 .2 7 ' 107.6 6 'N22° 3 8 ' 1 7 " E 120.97' N13°40'0 6 " E L= 4 2 . 6 8 ' R = 2 5 . 0 0 ' CB = S 3 1 ° 0 8 ' 5 4 " E C H = 3 7 . 6 8 ' 6 6 . 0 0 ' N 7 2 ° 4 1 ' 2 3 " E S8 4 ° 3 5 ' 3 7 " E 1 3 3 . 2 2 ' L=313.54'R=267.00' CB=S50°57'07"E CH=295.83' L= 3 9 . 2 7 ' R = 2 5 . 0 0 ' CB = N 4 3 ° 3 2 ' 3 7 " E C H = 3 5 . 3 6 ' L=165.9 7 'R =3 3 3 .0 0 ' CB=S3°01'5 7 "E C H =1 6 4 .2 5 ' 82 . 6 5 ' N0 1 ° 2 6 ' 1 8 " W S11°14'44" W 1 5 6 . 8 6 ' L =3 2 1 .9 2 'R =4 6 7 .0 0 ' C B =S 8 °3 0 '1 0 "E C H =3 15 .5 9 ' N8 8 ° 3 2 ' 3 6 " E 9 4 . 6 5 ' L= 6 2 . 6 9 ' R = 3 1 5 . 0 0 ' CB = S 8 5 ° 4 5 ' 2 0 " E C H = 6 2 . 5 8 ' 74 . 6 6 ' N0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " W 74 . 6 6 ' N0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " W 74 . 6 6 ' N0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " W 40 . 0 0 ' N8 8 ° 2 8 ' 0 9 " E 74 . 6 6 ' N0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " W 74 . 6 6 ' N0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " W Illinois Professional Design Firm # 184-001322 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 t. 630.553.7560 f. 630.553.7646 www.hrgreen.com 1 O F 2 5455565758 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 35 7 359 PRESTWICKLANECALL A N D E R T R A I L DE N O T E S A R E A H E R E B Y D E D I C A T E D TO T H E U N I T E D C I T Y O F Y O R K V I L L E FO R P U B L I C R I G H T - O F - W A Y A N D UT I L I T Y P U R P O S E S . WH I T E K I R K LA N E 358 35 8 358MUSTANG WAY MU S T A N G WA Y WHITEK I R K L A N E MU S T A N G W A Y LO T 2 LO T 1 35 8 *S E E N O T E 9 DE N O T E S 5 / 8 " I R O N R O D F O U N D DE N O T E S 5 / 8 " I R O N R O D S E T FOR REVIEW 74 . 6 8 ' S0 1 ° 3 2 ' 4 0 " E Illinois Professional Design Firm # 184-001322 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Suite 201, Yorkville, Illinois 60560 t. 630.553.7560 f. 630.553.7646 www.hrgreen.com 2 O F 2 PI N s : P T . 0 5 - 1 0 - 2 0 0 - 0 0 7 05 - 1 0 - 2 7 7 - 0 0 1 FO R R E V I E W 157226/3 12 EXHIBIT C ASHLEY POINTE FEES PER UNIT A paid receipt from the School District Office, 602-A Center Parkway, Yorkville, Illinois, must be presented to the City prior to issuance of permit $3,000.00 Separate Yorkville-Bristol Sanitary District fee – made payable to Y.B.S.D. $1,400.00 United City of Yorkville Fees 1. Building Permit Cost $650.00 plus $0.20 per square foot $650+$0.20(SF) 2. Water Connection Fees SF and DU $3,700 2+ Bed Att N/A 3. Water Meter Cost Detached Units $ 475 Attached Unit N/A 4. City Sewer Connection Fees $2,000 5. Water and Sewer Inspection Fee $ 25 6. Public Walks/Driveway Inspection Fee $ 35 7. Development Fees Public Works $ 700 Police $ 300 Building $ 150 Library (see note “d” below) $500 * $250 Parks & Recreation $50 Engineering $100 Bristol-Kendall Fire (see note “c” below) $1000 * $500 8. School Fees (see note “a” below) Apartment Townhome Duplex Single Family School N/A N/A N/A $1.792.68 157226/3 13 9. All Road Contributions N/A; to be satisfied by improvements to Penman/Rt. 126; Ashley Road/Rt. 126; and Ashley Road Improvements 10. Weather Warning Siren Fee (see note “b” below) $ 75/acre 11. Park Fees. a. Value per acre – $30,000 b. Acres required: 10.05 total acres 6.67 acres dedicated 3.38 acres unsatisfied c. Actual cost of paving parking lot as evidenced by paid invoices shall be deducted from total amount due. d. (i) Payment of one-third (1/3) of the amount due after credit for parking lot paving shall be due within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice from the City; (ii) Payment of one-third (1/3) shall be due on the one year anniversary of the date of approval of this First Amendment by the City Council; and, (iii)Final one-third (1/3) payment shall be due on the second year anniversary of the date of approval of this First Amendment by the City Council. Notes: a. School fees are $1,792.68 per lot, payable at building permit. b. $75/acre x 193.81 = $14,535. $54.25/lot payable at building permit. c. 50% of BKFD fee for Unit 1 paid ($52,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1, (104) pay $500/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay $1,000/lot at building permit. d. 50% of library fee for Unit 1 paid ($26,000). Remaining lots in Unit 1 (104) pay $250.00/lot at building permit. All remaining lots in future units pay $500/lot at building permit. 157226/3 14 157226/3 15 157226/3 16 70.00' 6 ( 61 . 1 6 ' 6 : 116.69' 1 ( 6 ( 11 2 . 0 2 ' 6 ( 1 1 1 . 9 2 ' 6 ( 6 ( 1 ( 88.65'1 ( 88.65'1 ( 90.04' 6 ( 85.86' 6 ( 88.65' 1 ( 13 . 2 0 ' 1 ( 127.6 1 ' 1 ( 216.00 ' 1 ( 0.59' 6 ( 2 8 3 .0 0 ' 4 6 ' '4 5 "E L=35.22' R=25.00' &+ &% 1 ( L=46.60' R=267.00' &+ &% 6 ( L=0.73' R=265.00' CH=0.73' &% 6 : 86 . 8 0 ' 6 : 80 . 0 0 ' 6 : 1 0 6 . 0 1 ' 6 ( 1 : 52 . 3 9 ' 6 ( LOT 358 LOT 109 LOT 110 LOT 111 LOT 112 LOT 113 LOT 114 LOT 115 LOT 116 LOT 117 LOT 118 LOT 119 LOT 120 LOT 121 LOT 122 LOT 123 LOT 124 LOT 317 LOT 273 LOT 274 LOT 275 LOT 338 LOT 339 LOT 340 LOT 341 LOT 342 LOT 343 LOT 344 LOT 345 LOT 346 LOT 347 LOT 348 LOT 349 LOT 350 LOT 351 LOT 337 LOT 336 LOT 335 LOT 276 LOT 277 LOT 278 LOT 271 LOT 270 LOT 269 LOT 268 LOT 247 LOT 248 LOT 267 LOT 266 LOT 265 LOT 264 LOT 249 LOT 250 LOT 251 LOT 252 LOT 253 LOT 260 LOT 334 LOT 333 LOT 332 LOT 331 LOT 279 LOT 280 LOT 281 LOT 282 LOT 283 LOT 284 LOT 330 LOT 285 LOT 356 LOT 355 LOT 354 LOT 353 LOT 352 LOT 170 LOT 155 LOT 288 LOT 289 LOT 290 LOT 291 LOT 292 LOT 293 LOT 294 LOT 295 LOT 296 LOT 297 LOT 298 LOT 299 LOT 300 LOT 301 LOT 302 LOT 303LOT 304LOT 305 LOT 306 LOT 308 LOT 307 LOT 328 LOT 329 LOT 309 LOT 310 LOT 311 LOT 312 LOT 313 LOT 314 LOT 315 LOT 327 LOT 326 LOT 325 LOT 324 LOT 323 LOT 322 LOT 321 LOT 320 LOT 319 LOT 316 LOT 318 LOT 139 LOT 140 LOT 287 LOT 286 LOT 125 LOT 156 LOT 157 CA R N O U S T I E T R A I L S T . A N D R E W S D R I V E BELLEISLE L A N E LADYBANK S D R I V E S T . A N D R E W S D R I V E RO S E M O U N T D R I V E WH I T E K I R K L A N E 74 . 6 3 ' 6 ( 6 ( 6 ( ST. ANDREWS D R I V E S T. ANDREWS DRI V E LOT 263 LOT 262 LOT 261 LOT 259 LOT 258 LOT 256 LOT 255 LOT 254 LOT 272 LOT 244 LOT 245 LOT 366 84.51' 1 ( 6 ( 37.26' 6 ( 5 5 . 6 5 ' 6 ( 7 1 . 0 4 ' 6 ( 8 7 . 8 8 ' 6 ( 8 0 . 0 0 ' 6 ( 7 7 . 4 2 ' 6 ( 7 1 . 0 4 ' 6 ( 72 . 9 9 ' 6 : 1 0 6 . 4 5 ' 6 ( 10 6 . 4 5 ' 6 : LOT 269 6 ( 6 : 40.03' L=39.27' R=25.00' &% 1 :&+ 6 : 94.65' L=112.32' R=385.00' &% 1 :&+ L=29.46' R=25.00' &% 6 :&+ L =3 4 0 .2 7 'R =3 3 3 .0 0 ' C B =S 6 7 0 0 '2 6 "W C H =3 2 5 .6 6 ' 1 : L =2 7 2 .0 0 'R =9 6 7 .0 0 ' C B =S 8 8 13 '2 0 "W C H =2 71.11' 6 : L = 5 7 1. 2 0' R = 3 3 3.00' C B = N 5 0 41 '4 6 " W C H =503.70' 1 : L = 3 6 1 . 3 8 ' R = 7 1 7 . 0 0 ' C B = N 1 5 5 9 ' 4 4 " W C H = 3 5 7 . 5 7 ' 1 : L = 2 6 1 . 1 9 ' R = 3 3 5 . 0 0 ' C B = N 8 0 5 ' 5 6 " W C H = 2 5 4.6 2' 70.00' 6 ( L=142.07' R=265.00' &% 1 (&+ 38. 4 6 ' 1 ( 113 . 7 5 ' 1 ( L=39.27' R=25.00' &% 1 (&+ 6 : 150 . 0 0 ' 1 0 2 . 5 4 ' 6 ( 80 . 0 0 ' 6 ( 94. 2 3 ' 6 ( 25 7 . 2 5 ' 6 ( 100 . 1 5 ' 6 ( 117.55' 6 ( 6 ( 119.65' 1 ( 119. 6 5 ' 1 ( 125 . 3 6 ' 1 ( L = 2 6 7 . 4 0 ' R = 3 3 3 . 0 0 ' CB= S 5 14 ' 4 7 " E C H = 2 6 0 . 2 7 ' 10 7 . 6 6 ' 1 ( 12 0 . 9 7 ' 1 ( L=42.68' R=25.00' &% 6 (&+ 66.00' 1 ( 6 ( L=313.5 4' R = 2 6 7 . 0 0 ' CB=S505 7'0 7 " E C H= 2 9 5 . 8 3 ' L=39.27' R=25.00' &% 1 (&+ L=16 5.9 7 ' R = 3 3 3 . 0 0 ' CB=S301' 5 7 " E C H = 1 6 4 . 2 5 ' 82.65' 1 : 6 : L = 3 2 1 . 9 2 ' R = 4 6 7 . 0 0 ' C B = S 8 3 0 ' 1 0 " E C H = 3 15 . 5 9 ' 1 ( L=62.69' R=315.00' &% 6 (&+ 74.66' 1 : 74.66' 1 : 74.66' 1 : 40.00' 1 ( 74.66' 1 : 74.66' 1 : Il l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 1 3 2 2 65 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , S u i t e 2 0 1 , Yo r k v i l l e , I l l i n o i s 6 0 5 6 0 t. 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 ww w . h r g r e e n . c o m EXHIBIT 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 105 106 107 108 357 359 P R E S T W I C K L A N E CA L L A N D E R T R A I L DENOTES AREA HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. W H I T E K I R K L A N E 358 358 358 MU S T A N G W A Y MUSTANG WAY WH I T E K I R K L A N E MUSTANG WA Y LOT 2 LOT 1 358 *SEE NOTE XX DENOTES 5/8" IRON ROD FOUND DENOTES 5/8" IRON ROD SET FOR REFERENCE ONLY 74.68' 6 ( 20 0 10 0 50 0 200100500 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Memo To: David Schultz, P.E., HR Green From: Bruce J. Aderman, P.E. Cc: Brad Sanderson, P.E., EEI Julie Morrison, P.E.,EEI Krysti Barksdale-Noble, CCD-Yorkville Date: July 29, 2013 Re: Yorkville Christian High School, Prestwick Phase 2 Yorkville, IL EEI Job #: YO1313-DR As requested, the following is a detailed review of the typical road sections presented in the engineering plan set dated July 5, 2013 as a follow-up to EEI review comments of July 23, 2013 for the subject project. General • There is a discrepancy in the height of the gutter flag between the specifications (10”), Sheet C-02 and the Concrete Curb and Gutter detail (9”) and the Reverse Concrete Curb and Gutter detail (9”), Sheet C-17. Thickness of the gutter flag and pavement section affects the thickness of the aggregate under the curb. In order to provide the proper curb subgrade elevation, the aggregate base course under the curb will vary depending on the pavement section. In accordance with the specifications the curb subgrade is to be a minimum 1” below the pavement subgrade. The gutter flag thickness shall be 10”. • Consideration should be given to revise the typical sections to show the curb subgrade a minimum 1” below the pavement subgrade to help clarify the aggregate base thicknesses. • There is a discrepancy in the thickness of the aggregate base under the sidewalk between the call out in the typical sections (2”) and the Sidewalk/Patio Section (4”), Sheet C-04. • Surface prime coat is specified on Sheet C-02 but no surface prime coat shown in the typical sections Sheet C-04. Typical Street Cross Section – Site Access Boulevard • There are discrepancies in the total width of the boulevard and the width of the drive lanes. o The typical section on Sheet C-04 shows a dimension of 21’ E-E (Edge - Edge) for the lane widths but is drawn from E-B of median. If the lane width is to be as dimensioned, the lane width would be 19.5’ E-E. Memo David Schultz July 29, 2013 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Memo o Sheet C-07 gives a dimension of 23’ F-F (or 21’ E-E) for the lane widths and a median width of 10’ B-B (Back – Back). This would result in a total road width of 58’ B-B or 55’ E-E. The typical section on Sheet C-04 shows a total road width of 55’ B-B and 52’ E-E. • Key Note 9 & 10 appears to identify the same item but with varying level of detail in the description. • The structural number (SN) for Key Note 5 does is not correct for the thickness of binder course identified (2-1/2”). The SN for the 2-1/2” binder course should be 0.88 and the total SN for the section should be 3.04 not 3.74 as shown on the detail. o If the SN is correct, then the thickness of the binder needs to be changed to 4-1/2”. o If the binder course thickness is 4-1/2’, then the thickness of the aggregate base course under the curb will need to be increased to 9” to match the specification for subgrade elevations between the pavement and curb (see above). Typical Street Cross Section – Mustang Way (Local Road) • A 10’ drainage and utility easement is shown on the right side of the typical section but not identified on the plat. Coordination between the engineering plans and the plat shall occur. • A storm sewer is shown on the right side of the typical section, however, no storm sewer is shown on the plan sheets. The typical section should match the plans. • The pavement section has total thickness of 14” therefore the curb plus aggregate thickness shall be a minimum 15”. The thickness of aggregate under the curb shall be increased to 5”. Typical Street Cross Section – Mustang Way From Ashley Road • A 10’ drainage and utility easement is shown on each side of the roadway on the typical section but not identified on the plat. Coordination between the engineering plans and the plat shall occur. • A water main is shown on the right side of the typical section however, no water main is shown on the plan sheets. The typical section should match the plans. • A sidewalk is shown on each side of the road on the typical section however, no sidewalk is shown on the plan sheets. The typical section and plans should match. • The ground slope on the left side of the typical section shows the ground to slope from the ROW to the curb in the parkway but the grading plan has the ground sloping way from the curb toward the ROW and the slope on the right side of the typical section is shown with a slope of 4% toward the curb but the grading plan is at a steep slope (+/-5:1). The grading plan is to be revised as shown in the typical section. • There is a discrepancy in the road width between the typical section and the plans. The typical section shows the road width to be 31’ E-E and 34’ B-B but the width of the road on Sheet C-07 shows the road width as 36’ E-E. This section is a 3 lane section and therefore should be a minimum 36’ E-E in width. The typical section is to be revised. Memo David Schultz July 29, 2013 Engineering Enterprises, Inc. Memo • The structural number (SN) for Key Notes 3 and 5 are not correct for the thickness for the aggreagate base course (12”) and binder course (4-1/2”). The SN for the 12” aggregate base course should be 1.56 and the SN for the 4-1/2” binder course should be 1.58 for a total SN of 3.74, as shown on the detail. • The thickness for the aggregate base course under the curb shall be increased to 9” to match the specification for subgrade elevations between the pavement and curb (see above). Background The original land-cash donation for the Prestwick of Yorkville development was $80,000, and in total the developer donated 6.67 acres and was to pay 6.2 acres in land-cash for a total of $496,000 to complete park improvements Staff met with the developer at Plan Council on Thursday, July 25th, and the developer made the following requests: 1) The land-cash value be reduced to $25,000 2) The proposed bike path through the school site and the park site be counted towards the required land-cash donation 3) The grading and seeding of the park be counted towards the land-cash donation* *The developer was informed at the Plan Council meeting that the grading and seeding of the park site is required whether or not the site has already been deeded to the City and cannot be counted towards the land-cash donation. Due to the reduction to the number of homes in the development, the developer now owes a total of 10.05 acres with 3.38 land cash donation due. At the proposed developer’s value of $25,000, this totals $84,500. The developer’s proposal was taken to Park Board at their July 30th, 2013 meeting. Land-Cash Donation The fee lock expired for this development so at this time their land cash value is $101,000/acre. At this time, the Park Board would agree to an $80,000/acre cash donation due to the fact that the park still has to be developed and the cost of playground equipment and labor has not gone down, but in fact gone up. This would provide $270,400 for park development of the 6.67 acre site. Trails According to the annexation agreement, the City agreed to own and maintain trails, however, no trails are located in the exhibit of the original annexation agreement indicating their proposed location, but a trail is now illustrated on an attached exhibit as part of the proposed amended agreement. The City also agreed that any contributions for land cash for parks not satisfied by land donations shall be made up with cash contributions for the difference in value or in kind improvements within the park and/or construction of bicycle paths. Memorandum To: City Council From: Laura Schraw, Director of Parks and Recreation CC: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks Date: August 8, 2013 Subject: Yorkville Christian School Subdivision At this time, the Park Board is not interested in having a trail constructed across the property when sidewalks already exist along the two adjacent roads (Penman Rd. and Prestwick Ln.) and giving credit for such trail. Because the school is private, Park Board recommends that language be changed in the agreement to only accept responsibility to own and maintain trails that are on public property as the City should not maintain private improvements. Park Board would be agreeable to giving credit for a parking lot on the park site as long as the location and size were approved and the City can inspect construction and verify the cost with a copy of all receipts. Due to the two existing roads that are adjacent to the park not allowing on-road parking, the park will be unusable for some time until parking can be provided. Recommendation Final recommendation is to receive $80,000/acre cash for a total of $270,400, which can be reduced through the construction of an approved parking lot. If the City Council does not approve of $80,000/acre, an alternative is to not take a cash donation at this time and allow the Park Board to request additional land or cash value at the time of Unit 2 platting. LAND VALUATION STUDY FOR: Cash Contribution in-Lieu-of Site Dedication United City of Yorkville, Illinois AS OF: May 1, 2012 BY: David W. Phillips & Company PREPARED FOR: Ms. Laura K. Schraw Interim Director of Parks and Recreation United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 D A V I D W. P H I L L I P S A N D C O M P A N Y R E A L E S T A T E A P P R A I S E R S A N D C O N S U L T A N T S 1601 BOND STREET . SUITE 208 . NAPERVILLE, IL 60563 . 630/357-8900 . FAX 630/357-8998 May 21, 20112 Ms. Laura K. Schraw Interim Director of Parks and Recreation United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Re: Land Valuation Study Cash Contribution in-Lieu-of Site Dedication United City of Yorkville, Illinois Dear Ms. Schraw: As you requested, we have prepared a Land Valuation Study in connection with the United City of Yorkville pertaining to Cash Contributions in-Lieu-of Site Dedication for new developments. The purpose of this Study is to provide our opinion of the fair market value for a typical improved acre of residential land within the boundaries of the Yorkville Parks Department. Our fair market wholesale value conclusion for a typical improved acre of residential land within the boundaries of the United City of Yorkville is as follows: $30,000 per acre THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS PER ACRE The above value is based on market conditions prevailing as of May 1, 2012. The value is subject to the assumptions and limiting conditions stated in the report. The following report describes the geographic area that is the subject of this study, sets forth the premises of the study, presents the data considered and communicates the analyses and reasoning leading to our value conclusion. Respectfully submitted, DAVID W. PHILLIPS & COMPANY Timothy J. Sullivan, MAI, SRA State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Illinois License No. 553.000278 Expires September 30, 2013 12707-SUM TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PAGE Title Page ................................................................................................................................................ i Letter of Transmittal .............................................................................................................................. ii Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. iii Certification of Value ............................................................................................................................ 1 PREMISES OF THE APPRAISAL Assumptions and Limiting Conditions .................................................................................................. 2 Definition of Market Value; Property Rights Appraised ..................................................................... 5 Scope, Purpose and Intended Use of the Appraisal .............................................................................. 6 Overview of Our Assignment ............................................................................................................... 7 Definition of Improved Acreage ........................................................................................................... 8 Area Description .................................................................................................................................... 9 Market Conditions ............................................................................................................................... 12 VALUATION OF RESIDENTIAL IMPROVED ACREAGE Valuation Analysis Introduction ......................................................................................................... 15 Residential Acreage Land Sales .......................................................................................................... 16 Market Data Analysis and Value Conclusions ................................................................................... 25 Supplemental Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 29 ADDENDUM Excerpts from Ordinance 2009-50 Site Dedication Standards Qualifications of the Appraiser 1 CERTIFICATION The undersigned do hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. We have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. We have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. Our engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. Our compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opinion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. Based on our experience and knowledge with these property types, we are in compliance with the Competency Provision of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. As of the date of this report, Timothy J. Sullivan has completed the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute. No one provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the persons signing this certification. Timothy J. Sullivan, MAI, SRA State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser Illinois License No. 553.000278 Expires September 30, 2013 2 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. The Appraiser assumes no responsibility for the legal description provided or for matters of a legal nature affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor does the Appraiser render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated in this report. 2. The property is appraised free and clear of any or all liens and encumbrances unless otherwise stated in this report. 3. It is assumed that the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless otherwise stated in this report. 4. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them. 5. Any sketch in this report may show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. Maps and exhibits found in this report are provided for reader reference purposes only. No guarantee as to accuracy is expressed or implied unless otherwise stated in this report. No survey has been made for the purpose of this report. 6. Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed unless otherwise stated in this report. 7. Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the Appraiser, and contained in the report, were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for the accuracy of such items furnished the Appraiser can be assumed by the Appraiser. 8. It is assumed that this property conforms to all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless a nonconformity has been stated, defined, and considered in this appraisal report. 9. It is assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national governmental, or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimates contained in this report are based. 3 10. It is assumed that the property is in full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless otherwise stated in this report. 11. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous material, which may or may not be present on the property, was not observed by the Appraiser. The Appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The Appraiser, however, is not qualified to detect such substances. Any comment by the appraiser that might suggest the possibility of the presence of such substances should not be taken as confirmation of the presence of hazardous waste and/or toxic materials. Such determination would require investigation by a qualified expert in the field of environmental assessment. The presence of substances such as asbestos, urea-formaldehyde foam insulation, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The appraiser's value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value unless otherwise stated in the report. No responsibility is assumed for any environmental conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The appraiser's descriptions and resulting comments are the result of the routine observations made during the appraisal process. 12. The distribution, if any, of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate allocations for land and buildings must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 13. On all appraisals, subject to satisfactory completion, repairs, or alterations, the appraisal report and value conclusion are contingent upon completion of the improvements in a workmanlike manner and in accordance with the submitted plans and specifications. 14. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) became effective January 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey analysis of this property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the requirements of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect upon the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider non- compliance with the requirements of the ADA in estimating the value of the property, unless otherwise stated in the scope of this report. 15. Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraiser, and in any event, only with proper written qualification and only in its entirety. 4 16. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraiser, or the firm with which the appraiser is connected) shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news sales, or other media without prior written consent and approval of the appraiser. 17. The Appraiser is not required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made the appraisal of the property in question, unless arrangements for such testimony have previously been made. 5 DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE Market Value is defined in Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA"), as well as the Federal Register 12 CFR Part 722 (Interagency Appraisal and Evaluation Guidelines), as follows: “The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their best interests; 3. a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; 4. payment is made in terms of cash in United States dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale.” This definition is compatible with the definition of market value in The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Edition, 2010, p. 122, by the Appraisal Institute. PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED The subject property has been appraised as if owned in fee simple, free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and special assessments. Fee Simple Estate is defined as "Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat." (Source: Appraisal Institute, Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Fifth Addition, 2010, p. 78.) 6 SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL The scope of the appraisal assignment defines the extent to which data is collected, confirmed and reported. In that regard, the scope of this appraisal has involved the following: 1. Collection of all necessary and pertinent factual data regarding the subject community, using public and private records. 2. Review regional, community and neighborhood factors and trends. 3. Extensive research, through various sources, to collect pertinent market data for the Sales Comparison Approach to value. Generally, at a minimum, the sales were confirmed through public records. In most instances, additional verification was made by a party to the transaction, i.e. buyer or seller, attorney, broker, etc. 4. Review and analysis of the market data in order to arrive at opinions of value by this approach. 5. Preparation of our findings into a Summary Appraisal Report, prepared under Standards Rule 2-2(b) of an appraisal performed under Standard 1. PURPOSE AND INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL The purpose of this appraisal is to provide our opinion of the fair market wholesale value for a typical improved acre of residential land within the boundaries of the United City of Yorkville. The intended use of this appraisal is to assist our client in determining the appropriate payments or fees in-lieu-of a land donation for new developments within the parks department geographic area. 7 OVERVIEW OF OUR ASSIGNMENT The United City of Yorkville is contemplating updating its ordinance that addresses requirements for new developments to dedicate park land to provide for the needs of the new population of these developments. In certain instances, it may not be practical for a developer to donate land, for a variety of reasons. In these instances, the ordinance has a provision to accept a cash contribution or derivative in lieu of actual land donations. In order to provide a fair basis for this cash contribution, estimation of a fair market value for representative improved acreage must be made. The focus of our assignment is to estimate what a typical purchaser would pay for representative acreage in the planning area. We assume the acreage is zoned, platted and improved, meaning no off-site improvements are required. Improved acreage means having street frontage and utilities at the property line (or actually into the site) offering immediate development capacity. We also assume the site is graded. Further, we assume the representative acreage has no extraordinary site features - either beneficial or detrimental to the development. It should be reiterated that our assignment does not involve a valuation of a specific subject property per se. Rather, it reflects what a representative purchaser would pay for acreage as defined above. One important factor with regards to defining representative residential acreage requires us to make certain assumptions relating to density. In order to do this, we have considered developments approved in the planning area over the last several years. We have also taken into account areas likely to be developed. We have reviewed the Yorkville Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Subdivision Control Ordinance. Most developbale land is designated as Suburban or Estate for future land use. Based on our research, we believe the most likely density of representative residential acreage will be within a range of 1.50 to 2.0 units per gross acre. We recognize that some acreage may be developed with a higher density multi-family residential project, but that the vast majority will likely be single family residential in nature. To reiterate, a review of the comprehensive plan indicates that the majority of land suitable for redevelopment is slated for lower density use (Suburban or Estate). While there may be pressure to develop certain areas as buffer townhouse or condo style projects, detached single family development is more likely. In fact, there are numerous instances throughout the greater metropolitan area where developers are seeking (or have sought) to downzone previously higher density zoned land to single family detached zoning. The prevailing thought is that there is likely to be greater demand for single family detached residences when market conditions improve. 8 DEFINITION OF IMPROVED ACREAGE We have considered the requirements of park site dedications. These are clearly spelled out in City Ordinance No. 2009-50. They generally require sites to be improved. By this definition, sites are to be graded and include topsoil. They are to be serviced by appropriate drainage and erosion controls. Utilities are to be brought into the site. They are to include two street frontages with a minimum of 450 feet and the street improvements such as curbs, gutters and are to be in place. Excerpts from this ordinance can be found in the addenda. The above is the basis for our valuation. We have been further instructed to assume the land is legally zoned and platted. This essentially reflects what the particular district/department would have to pay for a site in the condition described above. 9 AREA DESCRIPTION Location The area in the study is the United City of Yorkville. The city is situated in the north central portion of Kendall County and is located +/- 50 miles southwest of downtown Chicago. Nearby communities include Montgomery and Oswego to the northeast; Plano to the west, and Sugar Grove to north. Unincorporated areas of Kendall County are immediately adjacent to Yorkville in all directions. These are primarily undeveloped land areas with potential for future annexation to the city. A significant natural asset is the Fox River which generally flows east to west through the city. Yorkville was incorporated in 1887. It is the county seat. Population and Housing Characteristics According to the U S Census, Yorkville had a population in 2010 of 16,921. This represented a 173% increase over the 2000 Census estimate of 6,189. The 2000 estimate represented a 58% increase over the 1990 population of 3,925. Yorkville had enjoyed steady growth during the early and middle years of the previous decade and was one of the fastest growing communities in one of the fastest growing counties in the country. Due to oversupply of residential properties, new construction is down significantly in the last four plus years. The census indicated that there were 6,353 total housing units of which 5,912 units were occupied. The 2010 census figures indicate the median household income was estimated at $82,007 and the median age was estimated to be 32.4 years. The average household size was reported as 2.84 persons. The average family size was reported as 3.11 persons. Yorkville is inhabited primarily by single family homeowners. Most homes have been built within the past 20 years and are situated in well planned tract subdivisions. Until the slowdown in the real estate market, extensive residential development had been taking place throughout the city. According to the multiple listing service, single family home prices ranged from $50,000 to $840,000 over the past 12 months. The average detached single-family home selling price is reported in the multiple listing service at $211,956 over the last 12 months. There are a number of multi-family developments located in town. Most apartments are found in 2 to 6 unit buildings scattered throughout town. Condominium and townhouses typically range in price from about $16,000 to $274,000, with an average selling price of $75,211 over the past 12 months as reported in the multiple listing service. 10 Commerce and Industry Yorkville has a relatively small downtown shopping district located along Bridge Street (Route 47) and the Fox River. Many of the older storefronts have been refurbished in recent years. The greatest concentration of commercial development is found near the intersection of Routes 34 and 47. This intersection is billed as the busiest in Kendall County. A Menard’s anchors the northeast quadrant. In addition to the home improvement store, several outlots have been and are currently under development on the 269 acre total tract. The southeast quadrant features a new Jewel Foods Store anchored shopping center. Heading west on Route 34 are numerous new commercial ventures including the regional Kendall Marketplace with such major retailers as Target Superstore, Kohl’s and Home Depot. Major shopping needs are further served by the Fox Valley Mall area in Aurora. There is a large Caterpillar Tractor plant located northeast of Yorkville near Montgomery. This plant employs over 3,200 people. There are industrial areas in the north and south end of town. Major employers include Wrigley - Amurol Confections and Boombah. The latter recently opened a 265,000 square foot facility on 21 acres. Being the county seat, there are a number of government offices in Yorkville, as well. Many of these are new, modern structures. Transportation Transportation is predominantly by private automobile. The East-West Tollway (Interstate 88) is located + 9 miles north of town. The tollway provides convenient access to Chicago and surrounding suburban communities. Interstate 55 is located about 11 miles from Yorkville with Interstate 80 being about 19 miles away. Other major access routes in the area include Route 34, Route 30, Route 71, and Route 47. Commuter train service is available via the Burlington Northern Railroad in Aurora. Aurora Airport is located +8 miles northwest of town. O'Hare International Airport is approximately 50 miles northeast and is easily accessible via the Illinois Tollway System. Also, Midway Airport is about 43 miles away from the city. Community Facilities/Village Services The community is served by Yorkville Community Unit School District 115. The average ACT score for Yorkville High School was above the statewide average. Places of worship of numerous denominations can be found within Yorkville or in nearby towns. There is a rescue squad and 911 service in the city. Rush-Copley Hospital is located ten miles northeast of town and several medical clinics also serve the area. We do note that Rush-Copley has a clinic and emergency room in Yorkville. The local park board administers numerous acres of parks and various other recreational facilities. The 38,000 square foot REC center houses an indoor track, lap pool, whirlpool, open gym and fitness equipment. Numerous classes are offered here. Nearby recreational facilities include 11 Silver Springs State Park and the Hoover Outdoor Education Center, a 406 acre facility operated by the Kendall County Forest Preserve. The Fox Valley Family YMCA, which is located just outside Yorkville, also sponsors a number of programs. Yorkville is home to Raging Waves which is the largest water amusement park in the state. The city’s well water supply and treatment facility has significant excess capacity. Wastewater treatment facilities are provided by Yorkville Bristol Sanitary District by means of a secondary plant. Wastewater treatment facilities are also provided by the Fox Metro Sanitary District which has ample capacity. Electricity is provided by Commonwealth Edison; natural gas by the Northern Illinois Gas Company; and telephone service is provided by AT&T. Comcast is the cable provider. Yorkville provides full-time police protection. Fire protection is provided by f the Bristol-Kendall Fire Protection Department which covers the city and outlying areas. 12 MARKET CONDITIONS The real estate market is currently in a down cycle. Property values have been declining and demand has stalled, resulting in longer marketing times. This is due in part to the persistent sluggish national economy. High unemployment continues to persist. Supply far outweighs demand at this time. The exact time period as to when the real estate market will improve is unknown and opinions vary significantly among different professionals that are involved in the local and general real estate market. The present credit crunch has exacerbated the conditions. Project feasibility has diminished if it exists at all. Vastly insufficient returns, if any, do not provide the necessary incentive to attract and maintain a developer’s interest. New development typically does not justify construction costs. Based on numerous conversations with market participants - such as brokers, developers, lenders and municipal officials, - the limited activity that is seen is for owner users or speculative investors. The latter typically require ample discounts due to the uncertainty and risk of when market conditions will improve. Continued reports in the media state statistics citing the re-pricing that is taking place and the increased marketing times. Some respondents refer to market conditions as a malaise with prices being in a freefall. Also, there is a significant inventory of surplus land, condominiums and houses in the Yorkville market area. Interviews with local brokers report that negotiations presently taking place reflect that buyers do not see improvement in demand any time in the near future. Accordingly, prices reflect the lengthier anticipated holding periods. Also, most lenders we talk to report more planned “workouts” for builders and developers struggling with cash flow. This situation is likely to put additional pressure on re-pricing currently taking place. This could come in the form of additional foreclosures. Many lenders took mortgaged land back from developers and builders in the last several years. Some of these lenders intended to hold these properties in their portfolios until improvement in market conditions. When this never materialized, they tired of the holding costs and many properties came on the market. In some improved subdivisions, holding costs could come in the form of not only real estate taxes but also association dues. For raw land, at least the properties could be farmed and continue to be assessed as farmland with their lower taxes. Many property owners are drowning in debt, lenders are not significantly lending and for many real estate investors, property income flows are declining. There is an unprecedented avoidance of risk. We believe that financial institutions will continue to be pressured into moving bad loans off balance sheets, using auctions to speed up the process. The current real estate market is changing and the economic recession we thought we had in early 2008 has turned out to be much deeper and longer and has inflicted much more damage to the commercial and residential real estate industries than anyone expected. 13 The overall real estate market is not likely to recover until the unemployment rate decreases significantly. According to the Illinois Department of Employment Security, Illinois had an unemployment rate as of March 2012 of 8.8%, which is down significantly from the March 2011 rate of 9.3%. Kendall County had an unemployment rate as of March 2012 of 8.3%, which is down slightly from the March 2011 rate of 8.5%. The following table summarizes pricing levels for single family detached residences in the Yorkville market over the last several years. The data was taken from the local multiple listing service. YEAR NUMBER OF SINGLE- FAMILY SALES AVERAGE SELLING PRICE AVERAGE MARKETING TIME 2007 234 $309,513 166 days 2008 203 $293,744 217 days 2009 206 $240,157 196 days 2010 260 $211,967 190 days 2011 211 $230,084 196 days 2012 – 4 months 54 $205,508 186 days The overall price decline for single-family detached residences in Yorkville from 2007 through 2011 was about 25%. Like many communities, Yorkville appears to have a high percentage of foreclosure and short sale transactions relative to total sales of single-family homes. This trend has had a negative effect on values. There are currently 153 active single-family listings in Yorkville with an average marketing time of 199 days. The asking prices range from $40,800 to $1,299,000 with an average asking price of about $296,000 and a median price of $253,000. 14 Also, the amount of permit activity has dropped off significantly in Yorkville and nearby areas. SOCDS building permits database reports the following new construction building permit activity for the Yorkville, Oswego and Kendall County as a whole: Single Family Housing Unit Building Permits Year 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 – 3 months Yorkville 413 158 64 42 43 13 Oswego 434 149 136 116 112 24 Kendall County 1,061 349 217 171 169 39 We have considered data presented by such firms as Metrostudy. This data generally indicates that the greater Yorkville area has significant inventory of developed lots and that absorption has been extremely slowed. This factor has put downward pressure on lot values as well as raw acreage values. We were provided sales figures for several ongoing single family developments in Yorkville by Metrostudy. These reflect house/lot packages. These absorption rates are tempered by the fact that sales within these developments began from 2002 thru 2007, which were more favorable real estate markets. Current absorption is lower within these developments. This is true not only of the Yorkville market area but also the metropolitan area as well. Some key statistics found in the first quarter data supplied by Metrostudy indicates that there are currently 2,137 vacant developed lots and 20,768 future lots in the Yorkville planning jurisdiction based on approved plats, potential annexations, etc. This could translate into a 20 year supply or higher. The vast majority of this actual and potential supply is slated for single family detached product. 15 VALUATION ANALYSIS In order to estimate the value of the representative acreage, we have utilized the Sales Comparison Approach. This is the primary and most recognized method utilized in valuing vacant land. In the Sales Comparison Approach, market value is estimated by comparing the subject property to similar properties that have recently sold, are listed for sale or are under contract. A major premise of the Sales Comparison Approach is that the market value of a property is directly related to the prices of comparable, competitive properties. This approach focuses on similarities and differences among properties that affect value. Adjustments for differences are made to the price of each comparable property to make the comparables similar to the subject on the effective date of the value estimate. The basic steps involved in the application of this approach are as follows: 1. Conduct research to obtain information on sales transactions, listings and pending offers for properties that are similar to the subject in terms of characteristics such as property type, date of sale, zoning, highest and best use, size and location. 2. Verify the information by confirming that the data obtained are factually accurate and that the transactions reflect arm's length considerations. 3. Analyze the data on the basis of a common and relevant unit of comparison, such as price per square foot or price per acre. 4. Compare the sale properties with the subject and adjust the sale price of each comparable for all significant differences that have an effect on value. 5. Summarize the analysis of the data and estimate a final value conclusion. The sales on the following pages were selected as the most comparable in order to arrive at a Market Value for the representative acreage. Pertinent data is presented for each sale property and is followed by an analysis of the sales and final conclusions regarding the value of representative acreage of improved residential land. 16 LAND SALE NO. 1 Evergreen Farm Estates SEC & NEC Fox Road and Pavillion Road (as extended) Kendall Township Yorkville PIN: 05-06-100-102 et. al Lot Size: 48.88 acres Zoning: R-2, One Family Residence District Planned No. of Lots: 76 (Concept) Density: 1.55 lots per acre Utilities: Require extensions Date of Sale: December 2011 Sale Price: $414,800 Sale Terms: Cash to seller Grantor: PB OREO LLC Grantee: Brandon Road Properties LLC Document Number: Not reported Sale Price per Acre: $8,486 Sale Price per Lot: $5,458 Comments: Bank owned property which consists of two parcels bisected by Fox Road. The northerly portion backs to railroad tracks. This was purchased as an investment. Parcel approved for subdivision but would have significant off-site improvement costs including utility recapture. 17 LAND SALE NO. 2 Grande Reserve Yorkville Bristol Township PIN(s): 01-36-201-013 Lot Size: 877 acres (as reported by the buyer) Zoning: R-2, One Family Residence District PUD Planned No. of Units: 2,212 Density: 2.35 units per acre - Overall project Utilities: Immediately available (with most installed) Date of Sale: February 2012 Sale Price: $10,800,000 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: Bank of America Corporation Grantee: Avanti Properties Group. Document Numbers: R2012-059613 Sale Price per Acre: $12,315 Sale Price per Lot: N/A Comments: This sale involved the remaining land area of the Grande Reserve master planned community. The entire project included approximately 1,127 acres. The total number of units planned was 2,650 - which was to be comprised of mostly single family detached residences. The total project density was to be 2.35 units per acre. This includes acres of stormwater management, open space and trails. Portions of the project had been sold to different builders in the mid 2000s. This sale land acquisition was sold by the foreclosing lender. A significant portion of the land acquired in this transaction included finished lots. 18 LAND SALE NO. 3 Hunt Club West – West Side of Minkler Road Oswego Bristol Township PIN(s): 02-25-300-008 and 02-25-400-002 Lot Size: 51.67 Acres Zoning: R-2, Single Family Residence District Planned No. of Lots: 58 Density: 1.12 lots per acre Utilities: Immediately available Date of Sale: March 2012 Sale Price: $645,875 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: Hovsite Hunt Club LLC Grantee: Donald J. Hamman Document Number: R2012-00005989 Sale Price per Acre: $12,500 Sale Price per Lot: $11,136 Comments: This was part of a former Town and Country (Pinnacle Corporation) approved project. Land area includes an 11.3 acre stormwater management site and a 2.3 acre site. A number of annexation and infrastructure fees had been prepaid and credits exist for tap on fees. Asking price was $15,000 per acre. 19 LAND SALE NO. 4 Blackberry Woods Lots along Carly Circle et. al. Bristol Township Yorkville PIN(s): 02-29-123-015 et.al. Lot Size: 59.51 acres Zoning: R2 - One Family Residential Planned No. of Lots: 105 Density: 1.92 lots per acre project wide Utilities: Immediately available and some installed Date of Sale: June 2010 Sale Price: $1,647,500 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller, Grantor: Castle Bank N.A.. Grantee: Crestview Builders Document Number: 2010-00010916 Sale Price per Acre: $27,684 Sale Price per Lot: $15,690 Comments: This transaction involved the remaining unsold lots in the Blackberry Woods subdivision. About 62% of the lots were fully improved with the remainder platted but requiring the streets to be improved. It was sold on the basis of price per lot rather than price per acre. In fact, we have not been able to verify if the reported acreage is correct in CoStar reporting service. We note that the majority of this property (100 lots) is back on the market with an asking price of $18,000 per lot. 20 LAND SALE NO. 5 3663 Plainfield Road Oswego Township Oswego P.O. PIN(s): 03-28-100-008 and 03-28-200-007. Lot Size: +/- 82 Acres Zoning: Agricultural Planned No. of Lots: 133 engineered Density: 1.62 lots per acre Utilities: Require extension Date of Sale: December 2011 Sale Price: $1,194,870 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: Melrose Holdings LLC Grantee: Brandon Road Properties LLC Document Number: 2012-00000679 Sale Price per Acre: $14,572 Sale Price per Lot: $8,984 Comments: This is a trapezoid shaped parcel adjacent to the village but not annexed. Reportedly, a concept plan was in place for 133 single family homesites. It appears that Morgan Creek traverses the southern portion of the property. 21 LAND SALE NO. 6 SWQ Naperville Road and 127th Street Wheatland Township Plainfield . PIN: 01-35-100-007 et. al. Lot Size: 128.47 acres Zoning: R-1 Village Planned No. of Lots: 162 Density: 1.26 units per acre Utilities: At lot line Date of Sale: June 2011 Sale Price: $2,100,000 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: Wheatland Bank and Trust Co. Grantee: Riverstone Plainfield LLC Document Number: 2011-60787 Sale Price per Acre: $16,346 Sale Price per Lot: $12,963 Comments: This was sold by a foreclosing bank. It is an irregularly shaped parcel which is within the corporate limits and had received preliminary approval for 162 SFRs to be known as Riverstone. The Dupage River bisects parcel and the parcel has about 40% flood plain. 22 LAND SALE NO. 7 East side of Ridge Road, southeast of Plainfield Road Na-Au-Say Township Plainfield PIN(s): 06-01-400-002 Lot Size: 125.72 acres Zoning: R-1 Planned No. of Lots: See below Density: 5.5 units per acre potential Utilities: Require Extension Date of Sale: March 2011 Sale Price: $2,350,000 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: First Midwest Bank Grantee: S and E Investments LLC Series 5 Document Number: 2011-00007133 Sale Price per Acre: $18,692 Sale Price per Lot: N/A Comments: This is an irregularly shaped parcel which is mostly level. Significant building improvements with one being used for an Head Start facility. The improvements offer contributory value on an interim basis. No flood plain. Seller was a foreclosing lender. 23 LAND SALE NO. 8 NEC Dickson and Galena Roads Bristol Township Montgomery PIN(s): 02-11-151-002 and 02-10-251-004 Lot Size: 114.078 acres Zoning: R-3 and R5B PUD Planned No. of Lots: 319 including some townhouses Density: 2.796 units per acre Utilities: Available Date of Sale: December 2011 Sale Price: $1,532,520 Sale Terms: Cash to Seller Grantor: Jericho Holdings LLC Grantee: Dickson Galena LLC Document Number: 2012-00000184 Sale Price per Acre: $13,434 Sale Price per Lot: $4,804 Comments: This parcel was sold by a builder who had previously obtained annexation and preliminary approval for 319 units. The site plan included 21 acres of open space as well as a donation of 25 acres to the forest preserve. Utilities are at the perimeter of the parcel but would have to be extended. 24 CO M P A R A B L E A C R E A G E L A N D S A L E S M A P 25 MARKET DATA ANALYSIS AND VALUE CONCLUSIONS The preceding acreage sales have been analyzed and adjusted for varying features. Adjustments are made to the comparables to reflect what we feel would represent standard acreage with no outstanding parcel features. As stated before, Yorkville is a growing community with ample developable land remaining. It is surrounded by significant agricultural lands which offer potential development. Some of the sales cited are from outside Yorkville but are used here as supplementary data to support our value conclusion. These additional sales are comparable because they are generally in the same sub-market and appeal to the same potential buyers. It is important to note that extremely soft demand for residential lots has eliminated many potential builder buyers. Increasingly, buyers of land are investors taking advantage of relatively low prices compared to several years ago. In all cases, locational differences have been accounted for. We have attempted to cite sales in the last few years as they are considered most indicative of current market conditions. Older sales would have to be adjusted downward because of continued evidence of declining prices. Additionally, a key factor taken into account is the degree of the “improved” nature of the comparables. To the best of our knowledge, the reported acreage sizes of the comparables are net of any exterior street rights-of-way. The primary sales selected are summarized as follows: Sale No. Location No. Acres Date of Sale Density – Lots/Acre Sale Price per Acre Sale Price per Lot 1 Yorkville 48.88 December 2011 1.55 $8,486 $5,458 2 Yorkville 877 February 2012 2.27 $12,315 N/A 3 Oswego 51.67 March 2012 1.12 $12,500 $11,136 4 Yorkville 59.51 June 2010 1.62 $27,684 $15,690 5 Oswego PO 82 December 2011 1.62 $14,572 $8,984 6 Plainfield 128.47 June 2011 1.26 $16,346 $12,963 7 Plainfield 125.72 March 2011 N/A $18,692 N/A 8 Montgomery 114.078 December 2011 2.78 $13,434 $4.804 Most of the comparables involved some off-site costs. This is usually either in the form of extension of utilities to the perimeter of the site or road improvements to the existing street frontage. With most of the comparables, it is difficult to discern the breakdown of these type costs. However, we have reviewed a number of Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Cost opinions from proposed 26 subdivisions with which we are familiar. These generally range from $65,000 to $90,000 per acre. It is important to note that much of this is dated because little activity has taken place in recent years. However, the costs referenced above typically include installation of new streets and extension of utilities into the new streets. This total cost range has the majority of expenditures allocated to items that a developer dedicating a site would not be responsible for. In other words, only a small portion of the cost range is typically for “off-site” costs. We have analyzed the above referenced data and have allocated costs associated with installing curbs and gutters and grading. We have also referred to the Marshall Valuation Service, which is a nationally published cost manual utilizing data compiled by appraisers, estimators, and statisticians. The vast majority of sellers are lenders or troubled developers. While in stable market conditions this factor might require a “conditions of sale” adjustment, it does not hold true when it represents the predominant market activity. An interesting note is that agricultural or farmland prices are nearing or equal to speculative development land prices. Sale 1 is one of the local sales. It is more raw in nature than what we are considering as representative improved acreage. In other words, it is not improved to the same degree as what would be required under the dedication ordinance, i.e. as having utilities immediately available. It is adjusted considerably upward. Sale 2 is the largest sale cited. It is more regional in scope. While an upward adjustment is required for its massive size, this is partially offset by the fact that most of the lots are improved. The overall adjustment is upward. Sale 3 is a recent sale which is annexed and zoned but it requires an upward adjustment for its less finished condition. The net adjustment is upward. Sale 4 is the oldest sale cited. It is cited primarily because it is in the heart of the city. It requires a downward date of sale adjustment because of continued depreciation in land prices over the last two years. It sold in a stronger market. We reiterate that the 100 of the lots are back on the market at a higher asking price per lot and per acre. The majority of the lots are finished. Sale 5’s overall location is considered slightly superior and a downward adjustment is required. It is adjusted upward for the added expense of utility extension. Also, it appears to be affected by some flood plain. The net adjustment is upward. Sale 6 is located in Plainfield and a downward location adjustment is warranted. This is more than offset by the reported flood plain. The river offers a view amenity. It is adjusted upward for the higher costs of utility extension. The net adjustment is upward. 27 Sale 7 is unincorporated but adjacent to the Village of Plainfield. It is not platted. The comprehensive plan shows this area as potential mid density residential. The configuration and topography of this parcel would likely result in a higher density than what we believe is representative. A downward adjustment is required for the contributory value of the existing building improvements. It is adjusted upward for the lack of adjacent utilities. A net upward adjustment is warranted. Sale 8 is a parcel with a greater density than what we have opined as representative. It is adjusted downward for this factor. It is adjusted upward for its required site improvement costs. The overall adjustment is upward. Summary The preceding sales range in sale price from $8,486 to $27,684 per acre. The lower end of the range is represented by less improved acreage. The upper end of the range is represented by sales in superior locations or having greater improvements. The preceding acreage sales have been analyzed and adjusted as noted above. After making this analysis, and taking into account current supply/demand conditions for residential land and all other pertinent factors, we are of the opinion that the market value of representative residential improved acreage, as defined, is $30,000 per acre. This is above the range of the sales but is considered appropriate based on our previous analysis and especially taking into account the definition of the improved acreage (and its related cost to deliver such a property). Value per Lot Analysis It should be noted that our valuation of $30,000 per acre reflects a value range of $15,000 to $20,000 per lot, based on our estimated representative density of 1.5 to 2.0 lots per acre. This value per lot range is above the parameters indicated by the comparable sales. The price per lot unit of comparison is typically very meaningful during stable market because a developer is usually more concerned with how many lots are possible, the potential sale price of the lots and/or homes and the profit potential per lot. In today’s unstable market conditions, entitlements do not carry the weight that they once did. The price per acre is given primary emphasis in this assignment because it would be speculative to assume a specific density. Nevertheless, density is a pertinent factor and it has been given consideration in our price per acre analysis. However, it is not the only factor that affects single family land values. All pertinent elements of comparison have been taken into account. 28 Supplemental Analysis – Price per acre indicated by individual lot prices. We have also considered the sale of individual lots in the Yorkville area. The range of indicated sale prices per acre is $14,250 to $125,389. This is a very wide range but should be expected in unstable market conditions. The top end of the range is represented by the oldest sale cited. Prices have declined since this sale occurred. Many of these following sales are in well and septic areas. Thus, while improved for a residential structure, they do not meet the criterion of improved acreage as defined in this assignment. The smaller lots within the corporate limits do meet this criterion but are considerably smaller than the subject. Thus, they would be adjusted downward for this size differential. SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE LOT SALES Sale No. Location Sale Date Sale Price S/F Size Indicated Acre Size Sale Price per S/F Indicated Sale Price per Acre Comments 1 1979 Meadowlake Country Hills Feb-12 $14,000 12,150 0.279 $1.15 $50,193 Relatively standard lot sold by foreclosing lender. 2 362 Westwind Briarwood Dec-11 $8,500 17,500 0.402 $0.49 $21,158 Standard lot. Initial asking price of $26,000, reduced to $9,500. 3 Lot 124 Country Hills Jul-11 $23,000 9,600 0.220 $2.40 $104,363 Standard lot. Reported exercise of option. 4 Lot 46 Audrey Lane Rosehill Mar-12 $25,000 30,000 0.689 $0.83 $36,300 Standard lot, well and septic area. 5 7451 Fairway - Whitetail Ridge Mar-12 $34,000 33,000 0.758 $1.03 $44,880 Golf course community, well and septic required. Allows walkout, backs to golf course. Reported short sale. 6 Lot 23 Tanglewood Trail Jan-12 $14,250 43,560 1.000 $0.33 $14,250 Foreclosure sale of of in area of well and septic sites. Elevated lot overlooks valley. 7 Lot 43 Danielle Fields of Farm Colony May-12 $27,000 43,560 1.000 $0.62 $27,000 Short sale of lot in well and septic area. 8 461 Omaha Drive Heartland Circle Jul-10 $30,000 10,422 0.239 $2.88 $125,389 Older sale of an infill lot. Bank owned - foreclosure. 75' foot frontage. 29 Also considered is an April 2012 sale of 14 improved lots along Cryder Way in the Grande Reserve planned unit development. Each lot is reportedly about one quarter acre, or 11,200 square feet. This bulk lot purchase sold for $70,000, or $5,000 per lot. The sale price per acre was $19,444. This was a bank owned property originally listed for sale at $98,000. The analysis of individual lots compared to acreage should not be construed as directly comparable. Nonetheless, we believe certain parallels exist and the analysis offers support for our conclusion found on Page 27. EXCERPTS FROM ORDINANCE 2009-50 QUALIFICATIONS OF TIMOTHY J. SULLIVAN, MAI, SRA EXPERIENCE Real Estate Appraiser since 1978. President and owner of DAVID W. PHILLIPS & COMPANY, specializing in the appraisal of multi-family, commercial, industrial, and special use properties. Previous employment included Vice-President with Purcell & Phillips Appraisal Corporation, 1982 to 1991; Staff Appraiser, R. J. Schmitt and Associates, Inc., Real Estate Appraisers/Consultants, 1978 to 1982. EDUCATION University of Illinois at Urbana, Bachelor of Arts Degree in Finance, 1978. Specialized courses and seminars in real estate analysis and valuation include: University of Illinois Principles of Real Estate and Urban Economics Real Estate Investment and Analysis Real Estate Evaluation and Appraisal Appraisal Institute: Introduction to Appraising Real Property Principles of Income Property Appraising Narrative Report Writing Seminar Applied Residential Property Appraising Evaluating Residential Construction Capitalization Theory and Techniques, Parts A and B Standards of Professional Practice Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation Valuation Analysis and Report Writing Condemnation Appraising: Principles and Applications Various seminars sponsored by the Appraisal Institute, the Illinois Coalition of Appraisal Professionals, and other real estate organizations. PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS AND AFFILIATIONS Member - Appraisal Institute - MAI designation awarded in 2000, SRA designation awarded in 1989. State Certified Real Estate Appraiser - State of Illinois Certificate No. 553.000278; Expires September 30, 2013 Registered Real Estate Broker - State of Illinois Summary-Report of Findings Spring 2009 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION....................................................................................3 METHODOLOGY..............................................................................................................6 RESULTS............................................................................................................................7 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................25 APPENDIX........................................................................................................................26 3 INTRODUCTION The Office of Recreation and Park Resources (ORPR) at the University of Illinois conducted a survey on Land Dedication Ordinances in order to update the previous study conducted in June 2003 by Dr. Ted Flickinger and John Comerio for the Illinois Association of Park Districts. The purpose of the survey was to gain up-to-date information that would help assist agencies, communities and counties that are considering an ordinance gain valuable knowledge based on the experiences shared by the respondents as well as assist agencies with an adopted land cash donation ordinance to better understand how their ordinance compares to others. This report is broken up into two sections. The first section is background information that discusses the importance of Land Dedication Ordinances and provides a history of how they have developed. The second section describes the survey we conducted including the data collection, analysis, and discussions/conclusions. We truly appreciate all of the feedback and information that agencies provided us in order to make this report. If you have any question, comments, or suggestions please contact Robin Hall or Dina Izenstark at the ORPR. The contact information is listed below. Office of Recreation and Park Resources 104 Huff Hall 1206 S. Fourth St. Champaign, IL 61820 217/333-4410 http://www.orpr.uiuc.edu/ 4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION “City parks and open spaces improve our physical and psychological health, strengthen our communities, and make our cities and neighborhoods more attractive to live and work” (Sherer, 2003, p.6). Research has illustrated that parks and open spaces provide a number of benefits to community members both directly and indirectly. Recent studies have found park use directly benefits individuals psychologically, socially, and physically as it decreased stress, fostered social interaction and increased physical activity (Bedimo-Rung et al., 2005; Godbey et al., 1998; Kweon, 1998). In addition, parks indirectly improved individuals quality of life through the numerous environmental benefits provided to an area including reduced noise pollution, regulated microclimate, and improved air quality (Bolund & Hunhammar, 1999). As open land continues to be developed it is increasingly important to preserve and protect open spaces in the community. In order to maintain the high quality of life that parks and open spaces provide for present and future residents without raising taxes, cities can enact a Land Cash Donation Ordinance (also know as Land Dedication Ordinance) which allows communities to preserve open space for public parks and schools (Bernard & Nance, 1996). A Land Cash Donation Ordinance is a law enacted by a municipal body (that could state), “…any developer building within the city limits or 1.5 miles of the city line and seeking to annex to the city, as a condition of being granted zoning approval, had to dedicate land (in amounts to be determined by formula) to the school district and to the park district for new school sites and parks (Bernard & Nance, 1996, p.1)”. The first agency to establish a land-cash donation ordinance was the Naperville Park District in 1972. In 2008, 95 agencies reported having adopted a land-cash donation ordinance within their community or county in the state of Illinois (Flickinger & Comerio, 2003; Hall, Huang, & Izenstark, 2008). Land-cash donation ordinances provide life long benefits to a community as many agencies have reported their value in developing parks, meeting the needs of the community, providing resources for capital improvements, and much more (Flickinger & Comerio, 2003). The amount of land that the developer donates is dependent upon terms set forth in the ordinance adopted by the city. The National Recreation and Park Association recommend that 10 acres of land is donated per 1,000 residents (Monson, 2006). In the cases in which it is impossible for the developer to donate land they are required to provide cash in lieu of land. The net worth of land is different among each town and city. However, in 2008 the Office of Recreation and Park Resources and IDNR conducted a survey and found 95 agencies adopted a Land-Cash Donation Ordinance and of the agencies that had a required amount of land developers were required to donate, 35% of agencies required 10 acres, 19% of agencies required 5.5 acres, and six agencies required 15 acres to be donated per 1000 residents in the population. Additionally, the average amount of dollars developers donated varied greatly from community to community and within different regions of the state. Please see attached appendix in order to get a better idea of the number of acres per dollar amount that land-cash donation ordinances 5 required developers to provide agencies (Flickinger & Comerio, 2003; Hall, Huang, & Izenstark, 2008). Agencies that have adopted a land-cash donation ordinance have provided many suggestions to other agencies considering adopting an ordinance. Some of the most common suggestions include: 1) land values should be regularly updated to ensure adequate funds are supplied to help meet parks and recreation demands of the community, 2) active use land is only acceptable which does not account for detention/retention land for credit, and 3) that park agency officials should be involved with the city in the planning process. One example, of a county taking advantage of these suggestions is in Kendall County. In 2001, Kendall County updated their counties land-cash ordinance from $45,000 per acre to $98,000 per acre (Scott, 2005). This means, if a developer wants to contribute cash to a taxing body instead of donating land they are required to contribute $98,000 per acre. Additionally, their previous ordinance required that developers donate “high and dry” land or land that isn’t considered floodplain or wetlands, so the district can use it as park or forest preserve land. The new ordinance does not consider land in a flood plain worthy as a creditable land donation unless the district deems it valuable to them for some future project, such as a trail system (Scott, 2005, p.1). Overall, these findings clearly illustrate the importance of land-cash donation ordinances in preserving the quality of life in the community for a number of park and recreation agencies. 6 METHODOLOGY In Spring 2009, the Office of Recreation and Park Resources conducted a survey of 98 selected agencies that had previously indicated the adoption of a land dedication ordinance based on records from the IAPD. Using survey monkey, 98 agencies received an e-mail asking them to participate in the Land Dedication Ordinance survey on-line. Initially 41 agencies had responded to the survey. A follow-up e-mail was sent to all participants who had not yet responded resulting in 17 more agencies that participated in the survey. There were a total of 58 agencies that participated in the survey resulting in a 59% response rate. A complete list of the 58 agencies that had participated in the survey is included in the Appendix along with an updated chart of the 98 selected agencies that had previously indicated from past surveys the adoption of a Land Dedication Ordinance. A copy of the questionnaire is attached to the next page followed by an analysis of each survey question based on participant’s results. 7 SURVEY Please take a few moments to answer the following questions; your input is most appreciated. 1. Does your agency still have a Land-Cash Donation Ordinance currently in place? 1a. If Yes, what year was it enacted? When was the last time it was updated? What was the result of the update? 2. Based on the ordinance, what acreage amount are developers required to donate per 1000 residents? 3. What is the total acreage of land your agency has accumulated as a direct result of this policy? 4. Based on the ordinance, what dollar amount are developers required to donate in lieu of an acre of land? 5. Does your agency figure the cost of land or the cost of land plus improvements in calculating the dollar amount for cash in lieu of? 6. Is your ordinance geared toward neighborhood parks, community or regional parks? 7. Do you have any trouble receiving city money or cooperation? 8. Please identify any limitations or conditions of the ordinance that impact your agency? 9. Do you have any suggestions for agencies considering a land-cash donation ordinance? 10. Please explain the value and benefits of the land-cash donation ordinance to your agency. 11. Would you like us to e-mail you a copy of the final report? 12. If you have a copy of your ordinance or any other supplemental information that you believe will assist us or other agencies please e-mail us a copy at rrhall@illinois.edu or send it to: ORPR-University of Illinois 104 Huff Hall 1206 S. Fourth St. Champaign, IL 61820 8 RESULTS OF THE SURVEY Question 1. Does your agency still have a Land-Cash Donation Ordinance currently in place? Fifty-eight organizations (59% response rate) responded to the survey indicating that their agency still had an active land dedication ordinance in their community. Question 1a. If Yes, what year was it enacted? When was the last time it was updated? What was the result of the update? Thirty-five organizations (61%) indicated when the land dedication was enacted while Sixty- three percent of the sample (n=36 agencies) indicated the last time the ordinance was updated. Results of the update entailed an increase in acreage, value of an acre of land, and/or an adjustment of fees. See below for respondent’s responses. Increase in Money for Development • Increase in the fair market value of land for determining contributions in lieu of park land dedications from $205,000 (from 2004 revision) to $239,000 and to maintain the estimated cost of subdivision improvements per acre at $45,000 for a combined total of $284,000 • An increase to the amount... • Adjustment on the fee • An increase from $234,400 per acre to $323,600 per acre • Increased to $100,000 per acre, from $75,000 • To adjust land prices to market levels • An increase of 6% in the value of an acre of land to a total of $87,000 per acre • In 2008, the cash in lieu of land requirement was increased from 185,000 to 240,500 an acre for land located in the city. Outside the city, it is 175,000 per acre • Adjusted the cash value if cash in lieu of land • Increase “fair market value” of land • Increase of cash donation amount by $20,000 per acre but none of it is passed on the Park District. It is kept by the village • Donation is based on price land sold for • As a result of community being mostly built-out, land in lieu of was eliminated in favor of a process that better considered property in subdivisions. Now, cash only and dollar amounts were updated to per unit vs. per acre and revised to reflect current building trends (i.e., town homes, multi-family units) • An increase in the value of an acre of land • More specific guidelines and cost per acre 9 Results of Agencies most recent Land Dedication Ordinance Updates (Continued) Increase in Land and Amount of Money per Acre • Additional funds per size of the development • Increased acreage and cash contributions • Increase in cash value for land in lieu of land Increase in the amount of land to be donated more controls on what District would accept, or expect with the donation • Increased dollar per acre and land donation per person • Change in acreage requirement, update per acre $$ in lieu of amount, per acre initial improvements fee and population density table • Re-assessment of Land Values • 10 acres per 1,000 residents with a cash value of $110,000 per acre • Increase in the value per acre, increase in numbers of acres/1000 population as well as the inclusion of several other conditional requirements the developer is obligated to follow • Increase in fees and acreage • Increased acre value • Increase to acreage and land value 10 2. Based on the ordinance, what acreage amount are developers required to donate per 1000 residents? Thirty-nine agencies (67.4%) responded to this question and three of those responses were invalid. The majority of the sample indicated the required acreage was 10 acres per 1000 residents (17 agencies; 43.5%) or 15 acres per 1000 residents (5 agencies; 12.8%) per 1000 residents. Figure 1 indicates the respondents supplied acreage amounts from the survey. Figure 1. Figure 2. From the population of agencies that have land dedication ordinances according to IAPD records (n=98), the majority of agencies reported 10 acres per 1000 residents (40 agencies; 40%). Eleven out of the 99 agencies results were considered invalid due to outliers and/or results that were not available. Figure 2 indicates respondents supplied acreage amounts from all agencies that have reported having a Land Dedication Ordinance according to IAPD records. N=38 Sample Results of Acreage Amount Developers are Required to Donate per 1000 Residents 10 acres 45%5.5 acres 8% Other 34% 15 acres 13% 15 acres 10 acres 5.5 acres Other 11 Population Results Developers are Required to Donate per 1000 Residents 10 acres 42% 5-5.5 acres 16% 15 acres 6%Invalid Results 12% Other (1-6.5 acres) 9% Other (7-15 acres) 15% Figure 2. 3. What is the total acreage of land your agency has accumulated as a direct result of this policy? Of the 36 respondents (62%) that answered this question there was a wide range of responses. 13 respondents indicated they did not know the total acreage of land that had been accumulated as a direct result of the Land Dedication Ordinance. The lowest number of acres that was accrued was .65 (Pleasant Dale Park District) while the highest number of areas accrued was 1,048 (Naperville Park District). A relationship between length of time since Land Dedication was enacted and number of acres accrued appeared to exist among many agencies. Please see Table 2 in the Appendix for exact figures among each agency. 4. Based on the ordinance, what dollar amount are developers required to donate in lieu of an acre of land? The dollar amount developers are required to donate in lieu of an acre of land severely differed among the agencies. Thirty-six respondents (62%) answered the question with a range of dollar amounts from $20,000 to $323,600. See Table 1 for exact figures among each agency. The answers to questions 1-4 from respondents are located in Table 1 on the next page. This chart illustrates the 99 agencies that had previously or currently indicated they had a land- dedication ordinance along with the year it was enacted, the year the ordinance was updated, the acreage amount developers are required to donate per 1000 residents, the dollar amount developers are required to donate in lieu of an acre of land, and the total acreage of land the agency has accumulated as a direct result of their Land Dedication Ordinance. N=99 Ta b l e 1 . C o m m u n i t y A g e n c i e s w i t h a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 12 # Ag e n c y Y e a r E n a c t e d Y e a r U p d a t e d A c r e s D o l l a r s P o p u l a t i o n Se r v e d Co u n t y 1 Ar l i n g t o n H e i g h t s P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 2 n / a 1 0 1 6 5 , 0 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 C o o k 2 Au r o r a , C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t ( C i t y ) 1 9 6 9 ( L a s t u p d a t e 4/ 2 0 0 8 ) n/ a 1 0 7 1 , 6 0 8 1 7 5 , 9 5 2 K a n e , D u P a g e , Ke n d a l l , W i l l 3 Ba r t l e t t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 6 n / a 1 0 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 C o o k , D u p a g e , Ka n e 4 Ba t a v i a P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 K a n e 5 Be e c h e r ( V i l l a g e ) 1 9 9 9 n / a 5 6 0 , 0 0 0 4 1 0 8 W i l l 6 Be l v i d e r e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 9 2 0 0 7 6 . 5 8 4 , 3 1 3 i n C o u n t y 12 0 , 0 0 0 i n C i t y 32 0 0 0 B o o n e 7 Bl o o m i n g d a l e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 4 N o u p d a t e 5 . 5 6 5 , 0 0 0 / a c r e 2 4 0 0 0 D u P a g e 8 Bl o o m i n g t o n P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 19 8 7 n / a 1 0 A c r e s M a r k e t V a l u e 7 5 0 0 0 M c L e a n 9 Bo l i n g b r o o k P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 0 s 2 0 0 4 1 0 $ 1 6 0 0 0 0 T o t a l o f w h i c h on l y $ 7 0 , 0 0 0 i s g i v e n t o th e p a r k d i s t r i c t 71 0 0 0 W i l l 10 Bo o n e C o u n t y C o n s e r v a t i o n D i s t r i c t O r i g i n a l l y i n t h e la t e 1 9 8 0 ’ s b y t h e Co u n t y n/ a I t v a r i e s T h i s a l s o v a r i e s d e p e n d i n g on w h i c h e n t i t y ’ s or d i n a n c e i s i n p l a c e 41 7 8 6 B o o n e 11 Bu f f a l o G r o v e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 1 n / a 1 0 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 4 3 7 0 0 L a k e , C o o k 12 Bu t t e r f i e l d P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 6 n / a 5 . 5 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 D u P a g e 13 By r o n P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 7 5 8 4 , 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O g l e 14 Ca r o l S t r e a m P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 0 ’ s n / a 4 1 2 5 , 0 0 0 4 7 0 0 0 D u P a g e 15 Ca r y P a r k D i s t r i c t P r i o r t o 1 9 9 4 n / a 1 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 2 6 2 5 2 M c H e n r y 16 Ch a n n a h o n P a r k D i s t r i c t M a r c h 2 0 0 5 n / a 9 5 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 W i l l 17 Cr e t e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 1 n / a 5 . 5 n / a 7 2 0 0 W i l l 18 Cr y s t a l L a k e P a r k D i s t r i c t R e v i s e d i n 2 0 0 5 n / a 1 0 1 3 5 , 0 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 M c H e n r y 19 De e r f i e l d P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 3 H a s n ’ t b e e n 1 5 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 1 8 5 0 0 L a k e , C o o k 20 De e r P a r k ( V i l l a g e ) 2 0 0 3 n / a 1 0 9 8 , 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 L a k e , C o o k 21 De K a l b C o u n t y F o r e s t P r e s e r v e D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 6 n / a 1 0 P r e s e n t L a n d P r i c e s 8, 0 0 0 ~ 1 2 , 0 0 0 / a c r e 10 0 , 0 0 0 D e K a l b 22 De K a l b P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 7 1 1 . 5 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 4 5 0 0 0 D e K a l b 23 Do w n e r s G r o v e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 5 n / a 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 D u P a g e Ta b l e 1 . C o m m u n i t y A g e n c i e s w i t h a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 13 # Ag e n c y Y e a r E n a c t e d Y e a r U p d a t e d A c r e s D o l l a r s P o p u l a t i o n Se r v e d Co u n t y 24 Du n d e e T o w n s h i p P a r k D i s t r i c t U n c l e a r o r i g i n a l da t e b u t p r i o r t o 19 9 2 20 0 7 1 0 1 1 0 , 0 0 0 5 3 2 0 0 K a n e 25 Ed w a r d s v i l l e P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 20 0 0 n / a 1 0 % O f l a n d f o r gr e e n s p a c e m u s t be i n c l u d e d n e w de v e l o p m e n t s 12 , 5 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 M a d i s o n 26 El g i n P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 1 9 9 8 V a l u e o f a n a c r e of l a n d u p d a t e d ea c h y e a r 10 8 7 , 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 K a n e 27 El m h u r s t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 3 2 0 0 6 1 0 . 6 2 1 , 2 5 0 s i n g l e f a m i l y ; 1 , 0 0 0 to w n h o m e ; 9 0 0 m u l t i - fa m i l y 44 0 0 0 D u P a g e 28 Fo x V a l l e y P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 2 - A u r o r a n / a 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 K a n e , D u P a g e , Ke n d a l l , W i l l 29 Fr a n k f o r t P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 6 R e v i s e d n / a 1 0 1 3 0 , 0 0 0 1 6 5 0 0 W i l l 30 Fr a n k f o r t S q u a r e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 7 2 0 0 6 1 0 8 0 , 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 W i l l 31 Ge n o a T o w n s h i p P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 3 n / a 1 0 1 0 5 , 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 D e K a l b 32 Gl e n E l l y n P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 9 2 0 0 7 5 . 5 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 D u P a g e 33 Gl e n d a l e H e i g h t s P a r k a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 19 5 9 1 9 9 6 1 0 7 5 , 0 0 0 3 2 4 0 0 D u P a g e 34 Gl e n v i e w P a r k D i s t r i c t P r e - 1 9 9 0 n / a 1 a c r e p e r 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 K p e r a c r e ( T h e G l e n ) & $ 4 0 0 K p e r a c r e ( a l l ot h e r l o c a t i o n s ) 57 1 7 9 C o o k 35 Gr a y s l a k e C o m m u n i t y P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 1 2 0 0 5 1 5 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 L a k e 36 Gu r n e e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 9 n / a 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 1 7 0 L a k e 37 Ha n o v e r P a r k P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 2 2 0 0 4 1 0 V a l u e o f p r o j e c t l a n d 3 2 6 0 0 C o o k , D u P a g e 38 Hi g h l a n d P a r k , P a r k D i s t r i c t o f 1 2 / 9 / 0 3 In t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l Im p a c t F e e Ag r e e m e n t n / a N / A N / A ; L a n d c o n t r i b u t i o n s in l i e u o f d e v e l o p m e n t im p a c t f e e o p t i o n 31 3 6 5 L a k e 39 Hi n s d a l e P a r k a n d R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 4 1 5 C a s h e q u a l t o f a i r m a r k e t va l u e o f t h e 1 5 a c r e s p l u s fe e s 18 0 0 0 D u P a g e , C o o k 40 Ho m e r G l e n ( V i l l a g e ) A d o p t e d i n 2 0 0 1 ; am e n d e d i n 2 0 0 6 n / a 1 1 a c r e s / t h o u s a n d 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 / a c r e 2 5 0 0 0 W i l l Ta b l e 1 . C o m m u n i t y A g e n c i e s w i t h a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 14 # Ag e n c y Y e a r E n a c t e d Y e a r U p d a t e d A c r e s D o l l a r s P o p u l a t i o n Se r v e d Co u n t y 41 Ho m e w o o d - F l o s s m o o r P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 8 n / a 1 n / a 3 0 0 0 0 C o o k 42 Il l i o p o l i s T o w n s h i p 7 / 1 / 1 9 8 1 n / a n / a 1 2 0 9 8 2 S a n g a m o n 43 It a s c a P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a n / a 0 . 1 2 , 0 0 , 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 D u p a g e 44 Jo l i e t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 8 n / a 7 . 5 f o r e v e r y 3 3 3 lo t s / u n i t s 86 , 5 8 6 14 5 , 0 0 0 Wi l l 45 Ka n e C o u n t y F o r e s t P r e s e r v e D i s t r i c t 0 5 / 1 0 / 1 9 9 4 n / a 1 0 . 0 0 ( 1 . 2 5 / s c h o o l pa r k ; 1 . 0 0 ne i g h b o r h o o d p a r k ; 1. 2 5 d i s t r i c t - w i d e or p l a y f i e l d ; 2 . 0 0 co m m u n i t y - w i d e re c r e a t i o n p a r k ; an d , 4 . 5 0 C o u n t y - wi d e f o r e s t pr e s e r v e ) Ba s e d o n “ f a i r m a r k e t va l u e ” - $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 p e r a c r e 45 0 0 0 0 K a n e 46 Ke n d a l l C o u n t y F o r e s t P r e s e r v e D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 8 2 0 0 6 1 0 1 1 0 , 5 5 4 9 6 8 1 8 K e n d a l l 47 La k e B l u f f P a r k D i s t r i c t R e v i s e d 2 0 0 4 n / a 1 0 5 4 0 , 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 L a k e 48 La k e F o r e s t P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t Un k n o w n n / a 3 9 5 8 8 1 5 , 6 6 8 p e r d w e l l i n g u n i t 2 0 6 8 1 L a k e 49 La k e i n t h e H i l l s P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t n/ a n / a 1 0 n / a 2 9 1 9 5 M c H e n r y 50 La k e V i l l a ( V i l l a g e ) U p d a t e d 10 / 2 3 / 2 0 0 2 n / a 1 5 8 0 , 0 0 0 8 6 0 2 L a k e 51 La k e Z u r i c h P a r k a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t n/ a 2 0 0 5 1 5 V a r i e s p e r u n i t s i z e At t a c h e d a n d D e t a c h e d Si n g l e f a m i l y / l o w a n d hi g h d e n s i t y a p t s ) 18 5 0 0 L a k e 52 La n - O a k P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a n / a 5 F a i r m a r k e t o f t h e un i m p r o v e d g r o s s a v e r a g e 27 0 0 0 C o o k 53 Le m o n t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 7 1 0 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 1 8 7 0 0 C o o k , D u P a g e , Wi l l 54 Li n d e n h u r s t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 3 n / a 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 L a k e 55 Li s l e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 9 n / a 5 . 5 v a r i e s 3 2 0 0 0 D u P a g e 56 Lo c k p o r t T o w n s h i p P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a 2 0 0 4 1 0 D e p e n d s o n s c h o o l d i s t r i c t th a t p r o p e r t y i s i n . Ra n g e s f r o m $ 3 2 , 0 0 0 p e r ac r e t o $ 1 2 5 , 0 0 0 p e r a c r e 70 0 0 0 W i l l Ta b l e 1 . C o m m u n i t y A g e n c i e s w i t h a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 15 # Ag e n c y Y e a r E n a c t e d Y e a r U p d a t e d A c r e s D o l l a r s P o p u l a t i o n Se r v e d Co u n t y 57 Ma n h a t t a n P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 1 n / a 1 0 . 8 9 7 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 0 W i l l 58 Ma n t e n o ( V i l l a g e ) 2 0 0 5 n / a 8 . 8 4 0 0 0 0 8 2 0 0 K a n k a k e e 59 Ma t t e s o n P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t n/ a n / a n / a n / a 1 7 0 0 0 C o o k 60 Mc H e n r y P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 19 7 0 O r i g i n a l ; 20 0 7 r e v i s i o n n / a 1 5 1 0 7 , 5 8 6 2 4 4 9 3 M c H e n r y 61 Me d i n a h P a r k D i s t r i c t W e o p e r a t e w i t h i n 3 j u r i s d i c t i o n s n / a a l l 3 a r e 5 . 5 V a r i e s a m o n g ju r i s d i c t i o n s 93 0 0 D u P a g e 62 Mo r t o n G r o v e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 8 n / a 1 0 n / a 2 3 0 0 0 C o o k 63 Mo u n t P r o s p e c t P a r k D i s t r i c t U n k n o w n n / a 9 . 1 6 3 2 5 7 ( 1 7 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 / 5 2 2 ) 5 7 0 0 0 C o o k 64 Mu n d e l e i n P a r k a n d R e c r e a t i o n D i s t r i c t U n k n o w n n / a * * * $ 1 , 5 0 0 p e r re s i d e n t n/ a 3 6 0 0 0 L a k e 65 Na p e r v i l l e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 2 20 0 7 8 . 6 3 2 3 , 6 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 D u p a g e , W i l l 66 Ne w L e n o x C o m m u n i t y P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 7 - 1 9 9 8 n / a 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 8 0 0 0 W i l l 67 No r m a l P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 1 9 7 5 n / a 1 0 a c r e s 4 5 , 0 0 0 ; D e p e n d s o n De v e l o p m e n t 50 5 1 9 M c L e a n 68 No r t h b r o o k P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 8 n / a 5 $ 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 C o o k 69 Oa k b r o o k T e r r a c e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 7 H a s n ’ t b e e n 5 . 5 1 2 5 0 0 0 + $ 3 1 0 0 0 ( c o s t o f im p r o v e m e n t ) 30 0 0 D u P a g e 70 O’ F a l l o n P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 20 0 3 2 0 0 7 6 1 0 0 2 p e r l o t 2 6 0 0 0 S t . C l a i r 71 Or l a n d P a r k R e c r e a t i o n a n d P a r k s De p a r t m e n t 19 9 1 1 9 9 6 F a i r m a r k e t va l u e a n d i n 20 0 8 f o r c o d e se c t i o n 7 1 3 4 , 6 8 9 6 0 0 0 0 C o o k 72 Os w e g o l a n d P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 0 n / a 1 0 1 1 8 , 9 7 6 i n c r e a s i n g 4 % ea c h J a n . 1 35 0 0 0 K e n d a l l , W i l l 73 Ot t a w a R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 2 0 0 6 n / a n / a n / a 1 8 5 0 0 L a S a l l e 74 Pa l a t i n e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 7 7 2 0 0 6 9 . 1 8 n o t i n c l u d i n g sc h o o l a c r e s 13 5 , 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 0 C o o k 75 Pa r k F o r e s t R e c r e a t i o n a n d P a r k s De p a r t m e n t 19 7 6 2 0 0 5 1 0 3 0 , 0 0 0 f o r l a n d p l u s 10 , 0 0 0 f o r i n i t i a l im p r o v e m e n t 23 4 6 2 C o o k / W i l l 76 Pe o r i a P a r k D i s t r i c t ( P l e a s u r e D r i v e w a y & Pa r k D i s t r i c t ) 19 7 2 n / a 1 $ 5 6 / 4 2 / 3 5 p e r si n g l e / a t t a c h e d / d e p a r t m e t n 13 5 0 0 0 P e o r i a 77 Pl a i n f i e l d T o w n s h i p P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 8 n / a 1 0 1 3 9 7 2 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 W i l l , K e n d a l l Ta b l e 1 . C o m m u n i t y A g e n c i e s w i t h a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n O r d i n a n c e 16 # Ag e n c y Y e a r E n a c t e d Y e a r U p d a t e d A c r e s D o l l a r s P o p u l a t i o n Se r v e d Co u n t y 78 Pl e a s a n t D a l e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 5 ( w i t h B u r r Ri d g e o n l y ) 20 0 5 5 . 5 $2 3 9 , 0 0 0 + c o s t o f su b d i v i s i o n im p r o v e m e n t s p e r a c r e at $ 4 5 , 0 0 0 f o r a co m b i n e d t o t a l o f $2 8 4 , 0 0 0 79 Ro l l i n g M e a d o w s P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a n / a n / a n / a 2 6 0 0 0 C o o k 80 Ro m e o v i l l e R e c r e a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 4 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 W i l l 81 Ro s c o e ( V i l l a g e ) 1 9 9 2 n / a 7 9 3 , 9 9 7 9 6 5 2 W i n n e b a g o 82 Ro s e l l e P a r k D i s t r i c t M a y - 0 5 n / a 5 . 5 N o l e s s t h a n $1 7 5 , 0 0 0 / A c r e 23 0 0 0 D u P a g e 83 Ro u n d L a k e A r e a P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 3 n / a 1 5 8 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 L a k e 84 Sa i n t C h a r l e s P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 9 2 0 0 8 1 0 2 4 0 , 5 0 0 a n d 1 7 5 , 0 0 0 f o r ou t s i d e t h e c i t y 46 0 0 0 K a n e 85 Sc h a u m b u r g P a r k D i s t r i c t V i l l a g e O f Sc h a u m b r u g Or d i n a n c e n / a n / a $ 1 5 0 t o $ 3 0 0 p e r u n i t 7 6 0 0 0 C o o k 86 So u t h E l g i n P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 19 9 7 1 9 9 9 1 0 . 5 2 0 , 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 K a n e 87 Sp r i n g G r o v e ( V i l l a g e ) n / a n / a N / A 3 0 , 0 0 0 4 9 7 8 M c H e n r y 88 St r e a m w o o d P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a n / a 1 0 A / 1 0 0 0 8 3 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 / A 3 6 5 0 0 C o o k 89 St r e a t o r ( C i t y ) 2 0 0 6 n / a 5 . 5 3 4 , 8 0 0 1 4 2 0 0 L a S a l l e 90 Su g a r G r o v e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 5 n / a 1 0 8 0 , 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 K a n e 91 Sy c a m o r e P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 5 2 0 0 8 1 1 . 5 c o m m u n i t y Pa r k 1 . 5 ne i g h b o r h o o d P a r k 12 2 0 0 0 1 4 9 0 0 D e k a l b 92 Ve r n o n H i l l s P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 0 ’ s n / a 1 0 1 9 0 , 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 L a k e 93 Wa r r e n v i l l e P a r k D i s t r i c t n / a 2 0 0 6 1 0 2 6 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 D u P a g e 94 Wa u c o n d a P a r k D i s t r i c t R e c e n t l y u p d a t e d in 2 0 0 6 n / a 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 L a k e 95 Wa u k e g a n P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 8 9 n / a 1 0 n / a 9 3 5 0 0 L a k e 96 We s t C h i c a g o P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 5 n / a 1 0 2 3 0 , 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 D u P a g e 97 We s t m o n t P a r k D i s t r i c t 1 9 9 9 u p d a t e d n / a 4 1 2 5 , 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 D u P a g e 98 Wh e a t o n P a r k D i s t r i c t 2 0 0 1 n / a 5 . 5 1 5 0 0 0 0 6 1 5 0 0 D u P a g e 99 Yo r k v i l l e P a r k s a n d R e c r e a t i o n De p a r t m e n t 19 9 6 n / a 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 K e n d a l l 17 Question 5. Does your agency figure the cost of land or the cost of land plus improvements in calculating the dollar amount for cash in lieu of? Thirty-five agencies (60.3%) responded to this question. Eighteen indicated the agency figures only the cost of land in calculating the dollar amount for cash in lieu of while seven agencies indicated they calculate the cost of land plus improvements. Nine agencies indicated that it was not up to the agency but determined by the City, village, or the school district while four respondents indicated no response available. Figure 3. Additional Comments • From the agreement, “The cash contribution in-lieu-of-land shall be based on the “fair market value” of the acres of land in the development. It has been determined that the present “fair market value” of such improved land in and surrounding the Village is ...” • Land – we have a Real estate transfer Tax that helps in development of the park space • Park Districts have no legal authority to assess impact fees such as these. The authority comes from the municipality. Therefore our village sets the cash equivalent. It’s based on the cost per acre • Fair market value of an acre of land in the area improved • Cost of land only for this figure. Another fee is charged for park development • Through annexation agreements we also require a capital impact fee to assist with development costs • Land only, but cash can be used for improvements if a neighborhood park already exists • It is a Village Ordinance and they negotiate with developers on our behalf • No. Ordinance only provides for acquisition, not development • No, it is calculated by the City of Oakbrook Terrace • Villages determine this. One village does both Calculated by the school district Calculation of the Dollar Amount for Cash in Lieu of? Cost of Land 49% Cost of Land Plus Improvements 19% Other 24% None 8% 18 Question 6. Is your ordinance geared toward neighborhood parks, community or regional parks? Of the 36 respondents who answered this question 72% (n=26) indicated their ordinance was geared toward both neighborhood and community parks. Twenty-two percent (n=8) reported the ordinance was geared toward only neighborhood parks. Five percent (n=2) indicated the ordinance was not geared toward parks but instead the organization was given cash donations for redevelopment because the community itself was mostly built out. Figure 4. Both Neighborhood and Community Parks 73% Cash Donation 6% Neighborhood Parks 21% Both Neighborhood and Community Parks Neighborhood Parks Cash Donation 19 Question 7. Do you have any trouble receiving city money or cooperation? Of the 36 respondents who answered this question the majority indicated they had no trouble with receiving city money or cooperation (77%, n=28). The most common reasons for not having any trouble receiving city money or cooperation was because the organization was part of the city or village as a Parks and Recreation Department. Among the organizations that did have trouble reasons that were stated included: • On occasion. We would have liked it reviewed and updated more often • The first writing of the ordinance was a very long process that lasted over two years but updates have been very easy • The ordinance does not provide an adequate amount of funding for land acquisition • It was never received until the ordinance was enacted. We lost out on many land/cash opportunities • Some times the villages are so accommodating to the developer that full donation in land, which must be high and dry, is not always an option • We only collect fees and land donations for new development within the unincorporated areas of the County. Each municipality has its own donations requirements and not all of our communities have park districts. The cities do not collect on our behalf • The money is received from the developer. The city will not issue permits until proof of payment is presented • We cover three municipalities, each is different. One municipality has a recreation department that receives the donation negating the Park District from receiving anything. Another will not pass a land/cash ordinance. The third is very cooperative • City before 2006 took all the land cash funds for city parks. Now the funds and land are to go to park district. We are pretty much land locked now though • They believe it is their money and they can give it or keep it based on their needs in a particular area • No. Developer donations come to the Park District after the development is totally completed. 20 Question 8. Please identify any limitations or conditions of the ordinance that impact your agency? A total of 33 agencies (56% response rate) answered this question. Seven indicated that they did not have any limitations to identify. The limitations of 25 agencies that had responses are listed below and vary across a number of different issues mainly relating to not having full control over spending the money in relation to where they have determined the greatest need for the money. Appropriation of Money • All funds must be spent on capital outdoor improvement in the Village of Burr Ridge within 3 years of when we receive it. Since our district encompasses multiple cities, if we need the money for a park outside the Village boundaries, we have to petition to use it there • The village doesn’t pass along the full amount of cash collected. They keep the lions share • The Village has a provision that they can put 1/3 of the money in an open space and wetland maintenance fund it they so determine the need • The Village negotiates on our behalf as well as the other taxing bodies • The city and or county enforce it at their discretion • Villages have the final say on what we will get. For the most part they listen to us, but they still want the development • All funds go to City. We must ask them in writing and state what project will be funded. City administrator approves • We do not control it Issues with Ordinance • Limitations are dictated by village ordinance • Be sure to update the ordinance regularly. It is easy to fall behind on land values • Part of our park district is located in an unincorporated area of Oakbrook Terrace. If the development is with the city limits, our ordinance requires us to purchase land within the city limits rather than in an unincorporated area • Ordinance does not provide an adequate amount of funding to provide present or future open space/park/recreation space • Age restricted communities are not clearly identified in the ordinance. Credit for private open space is not clearly defined. We have spent a large amount of money in legal fees related to these two issues Issues with Value of Land and/or Money Received • Open space is not the problem. Development and improvements are difficult • Value not keeping pace with inflation • The Park District does not believe the village dollar amount fairly reflects the price of an 21 • They can receive up to 50% credit for providing open space or neighborhood owned park to the neighborhood. It’s usually small space that is not used much by residents • Quality and location of land donations • Our community is very built up, and very few opportunities for further development exist Additional Limitations • Assisted Living • If the land/development is already annexed, and there is a repurposing to residential we do not see any donation. We are impacted by population, but do not get land/resources to service this population • We are largely land locked and relatively land rich, so receive mostly cash for small and infill development • Parks and Recreation department is a part of the Village acre of ground in Palatine. Some parcels in Palatine are now priced at $750,000 per acre • The ordinance does not really have a benefit to my agency as we do not receive the benefit from the ordinance. The Forest Preserve District and School Districts are the primary beneficiaries. In some select instances a Park District might benefit, but more times than not the open space components goes to the county Forest Preserve District. Any limitations would affect the benefiting district and not my department. The use of the funds is limited to the purchase of land and or the construction of facilities (buildings, additions, on site improvements) that directly benefit the school (or open space areas and parks) that service the population within the subdivisions from which the funds were generated. Under the statutes governing their use, if the funds are not expended within ten years from the date on which they were paid or collected, the districts must return them • It is actually a City Ordinance adopted on behalf of the Park District. We have no limitations now, however could realize some if relations between the City and Park District were to sour. • Not being updated on a regular basis is a limitation, and we are basically a land-locked community. 22 Question 9. Do you have any suggestions for agencies considering a land-cash donation ordinance to your agency? Thirty-one agencies (53.4%) offered suggestions for agencies who are considering adopting a land-cash donation ordinance. Most advice pertained to maintaining a relationship with municipal officials, finance, and/or land. Relationship with Municipal Officials • Make sure you have a good working arrangement with the city/village. Everyone must work together or it won’t work well • The city officials need to see a value for open space. With the economy, many are willing to be more forgiving in order to cater to developers • Work with your City/village, get as much as you can but make it reasonable for the developer so they do not have disincentive doing business. In land locked communities get cash. Do not take unwanted land as it likely has a problem for future development. • Try to be included as early in the planning process as possible and give the Planning Commission and City Council and County Board members copies of your Park Master Plan and Land Acquisition Plans • Work with village/city in regards to notifying developer of cash in lieu ordinance as well as collecting developer contributions • Yes, survey other surrounding districts. Get involved with the village and the developer during the initial planning process • Educate elected officials that create the ordinance on how this will benefit their community • Work very closely with your city when developing the ordinance and recruit their assistance and commitment to the tenants of the ordinance. Financial Advice • Take part land and part cash for development if funding is an issue • Make it as expensive as it would be allowed by your Board • If you need the land, get it. If not take the money to maintain the parks existing • Such an ordinance is a great tool for any Park and Recreation Dept. Allows capital money to go towards development rather than just acquisition • Make sure you conduct population generation studies and an analysis of land costs and acreage requirements of the benefiting districts so that the population/acreage ratios correlate directly to the impacts you are trying to offset • Develop a good relationship with your city council and city staff. GO for at least $ 261,000 per acre Land Advice • Do not include the value of wetlands or storm water management areas in your valuations. Don’t accept the developer’s wasteland as your open space donation • Make sure it specifies the quality of land to be donated, no credit for wetlands • I would recommend getting 10 acres per 1,000 23 • Develop a park plan to guide development 2. Review ordinance periodically • Make sure it is set up to provide acreage/1000 and that it provides both acquisition and development funding. Also, the land provided should not be the development outlets, gullies and stream buffers (undevelopable land under your present code). If the land is undevelopable for residential development, it probably is not very good land for any park use/development either • Set requirements high to start with. It’s harder to amend the ordinance later • Make sure you have the ability to choose land or cash. Do not accept sub-par land (i.e. detention) • Make sure an accurate current land value is used and the ordinance needs to be either updated annually automatically through an agreed upon acceptable formula or at the minimum be adjusted every 5 years to reflect currently land value Additional Suggestions • Remove credit for private open space from your ordinance, since it is difficult to quantify. Add demographic tables for age-restricted communities. • Do it! • Should have one if any potential of developments • It’s a must, even if you do not have a lot of development going on • Do it before the growth • Do your homework and be aware of any new developments early on when they are being proposed to the county or city. Green space may be incorporated within the development much easier in the early stages and prior to permitting. Too late and you end up with unusable land or cash • Have something • No recreation agency should be without one • Make it mandatory that Park Agency controls whether cash or land and that money must be turned over within the same Quarter it is collected • Do not hesitate. Get an ordinance in place and do not be shy about thinking out of the box when inserting your requests for developers. 24 Question 10. Please explain the value and benefits of the land-cash donation ordinance to your agency? Thirty-four respondents (60%) provided valuable input on what some of the major benefits of having a land-cash donation ordinance is to their agency. The responses were categorized into three sub-dimensions: land, money for development, and additional suggestions. Land • The ordinance has allowed the Park District to add parks in the event of a land donation or accumulate cash for land purchases over the years. This has extended the capabilities of the District to delivery quality recreational services • The ability to provide more neighborhood parks and amenities at fewer costs to the village/department • It provides open space simultaneously with the development of the community • Without it we would not be able to continue to provide parks and facilities to our growing community • We have parks in every neighborhood that might not otherwise be there. • Best way to expand parks at no cost to the taxpayer. We have received more that a two million in cash which has been parlayed with OSLAD grants • It is the only way to obtain park land in new subdivisions for development. We may negotiate taking dry bottom detention areas in exchange for additional cash for development • As a result of this ordinance, 15 parks are available for public use. Cash given has assisted in the development of many park areas • We have received 43 acres of park land in neighborhoods and hundred’s of thousands of dollars for purchases of land • Helps to balance the impact of development. In the 1970’s and early 80’s, it was a good way to acquire park land • The ordinance has been a valuable tool in obtaining land/ or cash that can be used to satisfy the open space needs of new neighborhoods quicker than they may have been satisfied without the ordinance • The ordinance has allowed our district to obtain land through out town that we would not have been able to buy with our limited funds • Guarantees parkland for everyone forever • It may help us save some green space that is the last undeveloped land within our community and provide a natural setting and buffer for residents as well as ensure that the ecosystems are not completely disturbed. It also provides “teeth” legally that developers will have to put aside a portion for parks and recreation • The ordinance supplements our Capital Improvement Fund, which has been severely impacted by tax cap legislation. It has allowed us to place parks in newer parts of our territory without impacting traditional Capital Improvement funds. Money for Development • The money brought in by this fund has enabled us to provide multiple park improvements (resurface tennis courts, resurface basketball courts, refurbish baseball fields, install 25 baseball field lights, resurface walking paths, install aerators in our ponds, install a new playground, etc.) • Land that we wouldn’t normally have received, cash for projects on small pieces of land, etc. • Cash to make improvements and use with OSLAD grants • We are a small agency with a limited budget and are unable to provide capital dollars to purchase land or make improvements • We aver received significant dollars and hope to receive more • Monetary contributions have allowed for improvements in park(s) near the development • The present fee structure does not provide an adequate amount to be of any benefit • We have the ability to make big improvements when we get the donations • A fair and equitable way for new developers to pay their fair share of additional burdens • Much needed development capital that can be leveraged for OSLAD funding. Can only be used for the area and park site in question as interpreted by our Village. Additional Suggestions • The ordinance does not really have a benefit to my agency as none of the revenue generated goes into a general fund or other sources that would directly benefit this department. All monies collected go to the affected districts that can then use the funds to purchase land or construct improvements to benefit the residents of the developments from which the funds were generated • Recognizes the potential impact to the agency on services • While it has not produced large amounts of land or money, having the concept in place is important • Gives us flexibility • It is essential for our ability to serve the new residents • Per unit methodology works well in a built-out community that experiences resubdivisions rather than new development • Benefits are not to agency but to community • Only feasible way to include park systems through the community • We have received approximately 75,000 over a two year period 26 REFERENCES Bedimo-Rung, A.L., Mowen, A.J., & Cohen, D.A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health a conceptual model. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 28, 159-168. Bernard, M. & Nance, E. (1996). Land Cash Donation Ordinances Naperville Revisited and Today. Preserving Public Land. Retrieved http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/1996/ip960539.html. Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293-301. Flickinger, T., & Comerio, J., (2003). Illinois Association of Park Districts Land-Cash Donation Ordinance Survey Summary, Unpublished report, Illinois Association of Park Districts, Springfield IL. Godbey, G., Roy, M., Payne, L., & Orsega-Smith, E. (1998). The Relation between Health and Use of Local Parks. National Recreation Foundation. Kweon, B. S., Sullivan, W.C., & Wiley, A. (1998). Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment Behavior, 30, 832-858. Monson, M. (2006, Jan 13). Required land gifts for parks criticized. The News-Gazette. Retrieved March 7, 2006 from www.news-gazette.com. Sherer, P. (2003). The benefits of parks: Why Americans needs more city parks and open space. Retrieved November 10, 2007, from The Trust for Public Land Web site: http://www.tpl.org/content_documents/parks_for_people_Jul2005.pdf. Scott, T. (2005). Updated Kendall land-cash law approved measure more than doubles developer cost for cash contributions. Ledger-Sentinel. 6/23/2005. Retrieved February 22, 2008, from Ledger-Sentinel Web site: http://www.ledgersentinel.com/article.asp?a=4138. 27 AP P E N D I X Fi g u r e 5 . Nu m b e r o f C i t i e s w i t h i n e a c h C o u n t y t h a t h a v e a L a n d D e d i c a t i o n Or d i n a n c e 2 21 4 9 1 6 16 2 1 5 2 11 1 1 18 1 23 0510152025 B o o n e C o o k D e K a l b D u p a g e K a n e K a n k a k e e K e n d a l l L a k e L a S a l l e M a d i s o n M c H e n r y M c L e a n O g l e P e o r i a S a n g a m o n S t . C l a i r W i l l W i n n e b a g o Co u n t y Number of Cities 28 Table 2. Agencies that Responded to the Survey Agencies That Responded to the Survey Total Acres Accrued from Ordinance Arlington Heights Park District n/a Batavia Park District 150 of the current 358 they own Belvidere Park District 43 Bloomingdale Park District n/a Bolingbrook Park District 700 Boone County Conservation District n/a Buffalo Grove Park District n/a Byron Park District 1 Cary Park District n/a Channahon Park District n/a Deerfield Park District None DeKalb Park District n/a Downers Grove Park District n/a Dundee Township Park District 40 Elgin Parks and Recreation Department n/a Elmhurst Park District n/a Frankfort Park District 42 Genoa Township Park District n/a Glen Ellyn Park District n/a Glendale Heights (Village) n/a Glenview Park District n/a Grayslake Community Park District 180 Hanover Park Park District n/a Hinsdale Park and Recreation Department n/a Homewood-Flossmoor Park District n/a Joliet Park District 57 acres Kane County Forest Preserve District n/a Lake Zurich Park and Recreation Dept. n/a Lan-Oak Park District less than 2 Lemont Park District 14.5 Lindenhurst Park District n/a Lockport Township Park District 100+ Manteno (Village) n/a Matteson Parks and Recreation Department n/a McHenry Parks and Recreation Department n/a Mount Prospect Park District n/a Mundelein Park and Recreation District n/a Naperville Park District 1048 Oakbrook Terrace Park District n/a O'Fallon Parks and Recreation Department 10 Orland Park Recreation and Parks Department 150 Oswegoland Park District n/a Palatine Park District 37.5 Park Forest Recreation and Parks Department less than 5 Peoria Park District 25 Pleasant Dale Park District 0.65 Romeoville Recreation Department 184.5 29 Round Lake Area Park District 200 Saint Charles Park District 125 Schaumberg Park District n/a South Elgin Parks and Recreation Dept. 250 Spring Grove (Village) n/a Sycamore Park District 300+ Vernon Hills Park District n/a Warrenville Park District 0 Wauconda Park District n/a Westmont Park District n/a Wheaton Park District n/a KLOA, Inc. Transportation and Parking Planning Consultants 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 | Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 | f: 847-518-9987 MEMORANDUM TO: Michelle Stewart Yorkville Christian High School FROM: Michael K. Scavo Consultant Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal DATE: August 28, 2013 SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Study Proposed High School Yorkville, Illinois This memorandum summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the proposed Yorkville Christian High School to be located in Yorkville, Illinois. The site is located within the Prestwick subdivision which occupies the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The proposed school will have a maximum enrollment of 850 students and will utilize the two access roads that will serve the subdivision. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site area. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the development. The sections of this report present the following. Existing roadway conditions A description of the proposed single family development Directional distribution of the development generated traffic Vehicle trip generation for the proposed single family development Future traffic conditions including access to the site Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access roads, adjacent roadway network, and internal roadway network 2 Site Location Figure 1 SITE 3 Aerial View of Site Location Figure 2 4 Existing Conditions Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were documented based on a field visit conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location The proposed site is located within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision which is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The subdivision, of which Phase 1 is partially occupied, was approved for a total of 356 single-family homes. The proposed school will replace 84 approved single-family lots. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the site are described below. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is an east-west arterial road that provides a two-lane rural cross- section within the vicinity of the site. No parking is allowed on either side of the road. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under the jurisdiction of Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Within the vicinity of the site, the roadway has a posted speed limit of 50 mph and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 6,650 vehicles. Ashley Road is a north-south two-lane road that terminates at its stop sign controlled intersection with Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). The roadway is under the jurisdiction of Kendall Township with portions adjacent to Prestwick of Yorkville under the jurisdiction of City of Yorkville. Ashley Road has a 55 mph speed limit and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) of 500 vehicles. Penman Road is a two-lane road that provides access to Prestwick subdivision. Its approach to Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under stop sign control. No turn lanes are provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period traffic counts at the following intersections. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road 5 The traffic counts were conducted on Tuesday, August 11, 2013 during the morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and evening (3:000 to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods. The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:30 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and the evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 4:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. Figure 3 illustrates the existing peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Development Plan As proposed, the plans call for a high school with a maximum enrollment of 850 students. Access to the proposed site will be provided mainly off Ashley Road with secondary access off Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Directional Distribution of Site Traffic The directional distribution of future site-generated trips on the roadway system is a function of several variables, including the operational characteristics of the roadway system and the ease with which drivers can travel over various sections of the roadway system without encountering congestion. The directions from which site-generated traffic will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 4 illustrates the directional distribution of traffic. Estimated Site Traffic Generation The volume of traffic generated by a development is based on the type of land use and the size of the development. The number of peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed high school was based on vehicle trip generation rates contained in the Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 1 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total 530 High School (850 Students) 230 135 365 80 165 245 1,450 P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 3 N N O T T O S C A L E S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) E x i s t i n g W e e k d a y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 8 (14) 9 (15) 1 ( 2 ) 1 ( 1 ) 1 ( 3 ) 18 3 ( 2 6 7 ) 17 4 ( 3 5 3 ) 1 ( 0 ) 1 6 6 ( 2 4 7 ) 9 ( 9 ) 1 5 6 ( 3 4 0 ) 6 ( 3 6 ) PEN M A N ROA D P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 4 N N O T T O S C A L E S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 E s t i m a t e d D i r e c t i o n a l D i s t r i b u t i o n 0 0 % - P E R C E N T D I S T R I B U T I O N 50 % 10% 4 0 % PEN M A N ROA D 8 As shown in Table 1, the development is estimated to generate approximately 365 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday morning peak hour, approximately 245 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday evening peak hour, and 1,450 total vehicle trips during the day. It should be noted that the estimated trips represent the peak hours of the school which in the morning it coincides with the roadway system peak hour while in the evening it occurs prior to the street system peak hour. However, for the purpose of this analysis, the evening trip generation was assumed to coincide with the roadway system’s peak hour. Furthermore, while the school is anticipated to generate some of its traffic from within Prestwick subdivision, it was assumed , in order to further present a conservative analysis, that all trips will be external. Trip Generation Comparison As indicated earlier, the proposed school site within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision will replace approximately 84 single-family home sites. Table 2 is proposed summarizing the amount of traffic the eliminated lots will generate utilizing ITE trip generation rates. Table 2 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total 210 84 Single-Family Homes 17 52 69 76 44 121 894 When compared to the amount of traffic the school will generate at full occupancy, it can be seen that the proposed school will result in an increase of approximately 296 trips during the morning peak hour, 124 trips during the evening peak hour and 556 daily trips. It is important to note that the school trips are conservative in that not all of the trips will be generated externally and that the estimated trips in the evening peak hour will occur before the roadway system peak hour. Projected Traffic Volumes The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system (Figure 5) in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. In addition to the traffic generated by the development, the study also included traffic that will be generated by the full buildout of the Prestwick subdivision as well as the increase in background traffic assumed at two percent per year applied over a seven year period. The existing traffic volumes were therefore increased by fourteen percent and combined with the peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed school and buildout of Prestwick subdivision to determine the projected traffic volumes which are shown in Figure 6. P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 5 N N O T T O S C A L E 25 (3 5 ) 1 4 ( 1 7 ) S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 42 (47) SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 8 0 ( 2 5 ) 35 ( 1 5 ) 42 ( 4 7 ) 80 ( 2 5 ) 9 2 ( 3 2 ) 54 (66) 172 (57) 9 6 ( 1 1 3 ) 23 (8) E s t i m a t e d S i t e - G e n e r a t e d T r a f f i c V o l u m e s PEN M A N ROA D P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 6 N N O T T O S C A L E 92 ( 7 0 ) 28 (15) 2 4 ( 2 2 ) S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 62 (71) SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) P r o j e c t e d T o t a l T r a f f i c V o l u m e s Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 28 (18) 19 (33) 1 4 6 ( 1 4 3 ) 17 (51) 187 (112) 1 8 8 ( 4 1 8 ) 1 0 9 ( 1 1 8 ) 2 1 7 ( 2 9 7 ) 9 5 ( 4 5 ) 103 (105) 24 0 ( 4 6 9 ) 10 ( 2 0 ) 28 4 ( 3 2 7 ) 55 ( 9 0 ) PEN M A N ROA D 11 Site Access Access to the school site will be provided via two access roads: a full ingress-egress access road on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via the existing Penman road and a full ingress/egress access road on Ashley Road via the proposed access road planned to serve Phase 2 of the Prestwick subdivision and the proposed school. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Penman Road A full ingress/egress access road is provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Outbound movements from this access road are under stop control. This approach will operate at acceptable levels of service in the morning and evening peak hours under proposed conditions. A westbound left-turn lane should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) meeting IDOT’s design criteria for 30 mph speed limit (220 feet of taper and 215 feet of storage). An eastbound right-turn lane will not be required or warranted. Two northbound lanes striped to indicate a separate left-turn lane and separate right-turn lane will also be provided via restriping of the existing pavement. Ashley Road and Proposed Access Road A full ingress/egress access road will be provided on Ashley Road approximately 1,800 feet south of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). Outbound movements from this access road will be under stop control. Widening of Ashley Road to provide turn lanes will not be necessary. Traffic Analysis Traffic analyses were performed for the intersections within the study area to determine the operation of the existing roadway system, evaluate the impact of the proposed single family home development, and determine the ability of the existing roadway system to accommodate projected traffic demands. Analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the existing traffic volumes and the projected traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using HCS 2010 computer software, which is based on the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2010. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter grade from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. Control delay is that portio n of the total delay attributed to the traffic signal or stop sign control operation and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Level of Service A is the highest grade (best traffic flow and least delay), Level of Service E represents saturated or at-capacity conditions, and Level of Service F is the lowest grade (oversaturated conditions, extensive delays). For two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersections, levels of service are only calculated for the approaches controlled by a stop sign (not for the intersection as a whole). The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for unsignalized intersections are shown in Table 2. The results of the capacity analysis 12 are summarized in Table 3 for the existing volumes and Table 4 for the projected volumes. Table 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA—UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Average Total Delay (SEC/VEH) A 0 - 10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 D > 25 - 35 E > 35 - 50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road B 10.0 B 12.2 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road B 10.7 B 12.3 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road B 11.8 B 13.9 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road B 12.9 C 15.1 Ashley Road with Proposed Access Road A 9.9 B 10.6 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. 13 Traffic Evaluation The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road currently operates at an acceptable level of service during morning and evening peak hours. With the additional traffic resulting from the development of the site and the ambient growth, the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. It is recommended that a westbound left-turn lane be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and that Ashley Road be widened to provide two northbound lanes striped to indicate an exclusive left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. The outbound movements from Ashley Road should continue to be under stop sign control. An eastbound right -turn lane will not be required or warranted. At the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road, the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service assuming the provision of a westbound left-turn lane. An eastbound right-turn lane will not be required nor warranted. At the intersection of Ashley Road with the proposed access road, acceptable levels of service are projected to occur with traffic exiting the development under stop sign control. No widening of Ashley Road will be necessary. Conclusion and Recommendations Based on the proposed development plans and the preceding traffic impact study, the following conclusions and recommendations are made. The addition of the new traffic generated by the proposed school will be accommodated by the roadway system. Westbound left-turn lanes should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) at its intersections with Ashley Road and Penman Road. The two site access roads will be adequate to serve the total traffic that will be generated by the proposed school and full occupancy of Prestwick subdivision. 13-138 Stewart Proposed Yorkville Christian High School August 28 2013 mks lra KLOA, Inc. Transportation and Parking Planning Consultants 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 | Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 | f: 847-518-9987 MEMORANDUM TO: Michelle Stewart Yorkville Christian High School FROM: Michael K. Scavo Consultant Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal DATE: September 18, 2013 SUBJECT: Traffic Impact Study Proposed Yorkville Christian High School Yorkville, Illinois This memorandum summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O’Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for the proposed Yorkville Christian High School to be located in Yorkville, Illinois. The site is located within the Prestwick subdivision which occupies the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The proposed school will have a maximum enrollment of 850 students and will utilize the two access roads that will serve the subdivision. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site area. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated by the development. The sections of this report present the following. • Existing roadway conditions • A description of the proposed single family development • Directional distribution of the development generated traffic • Vehicle trip generation for the proposed single family development • Future traffic conditions including access to the site • Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours • Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access roads, adjacent roadway network, and internal roadway network 2 Site Location Figure 1 SITE 3 Aerial View of Site Location Figure 2 4 Existing Conditions Existing transportation conditions in the vicinity of the site were documented based on a field visit conducted by KLOA, Inc. in order to obtain a database for projecting future conditions. The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location The proposed site is located within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision which is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Ashley Road. The subdivision, of which Phase 1 is partially occupied, was approved for a total of 356 single-family homes. The proposed school will replace 84 approved single-family lots. Existing Roadway System Characteristics The characteristics of the existing roadways near the site are described below. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is an east-west arterial road that provides a two-lane rural cross- section within the vicinity of the site. No parking is allowed on either side of the road. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under the jurisdiction of Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT). Within the vicinity of the site, the roadway has a posted speed limit of 50 mph and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of 6,650 vehicles. Ashley Road is a north-south two-lane road that terminates at its stop sign controlled intersection with Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). The roadway is under the jurisdiction of Kendall Township with portions adjacent to Prestwick of Yorkville under the jurisdiction of City of Yorkville. Ashley Road has a 55 mph speed limit and carries an average daily traffic (ADT) of 500 vehicles. Penman Road is a two-lane road that provides access to Prestwick subdivision. Its approach to Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) is under stop sign control. No turn lanes are provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). Existing Traffic Volumes In order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. conducted peak period traffic counts at the following intersections. • Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road • Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road 5 The traffic counts were conducted on Tuesday, August 11, 2013 during the morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and evening (3:000 to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods. The results of the traffic counts showed that the weekday morning peak hour of traffic occurs from 7:30 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and the evening peak hour of traffic occurs from 4:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M. Figure 3 illustrates the existing peak hour traffic volumes. Traffic Characteristics of the Proposed Development In order to properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. Proposed Development Plan As proposed, the plans call for a high school with a maximum enrollment of 850 students. Access to the proposed site will be provided mainly off Ashley Road with secondary access off Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Directional Distribution of Site Traffic The directional distribution of future site-generated trips on the roadway system is a function of several variables, including the operational characteristics of the roadway system and the ease with which drivers can travel over various sections of the roadway system without encountering congestion. The directions from which site-generated traffic will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 4 illustrates the directional distribution of traffic. Estimated Site Traffic Generation The volume of traffic generated by a development is based on the type of land use and the size of the development. The number of peak hour vehicle trips estimated to be generated by the proposed high school was based on vehicle trip generation rates contained in the Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Table 1 SITE-GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total 530 High School (850 Students) 230 135 365 80 165 245 1,450 P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 3 N N O T T O S C A L E S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) E x i s t i n g W e e k d a y T r a f f i c V o l u m e s Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 8 (14) 9 (15) 1 ( 2 ) 1 ( 1 ) 1 ( 3 ) 18 3 ( 2 6 7 ) 17 4 ( 3 5 3 ) 1 ( 0 ) 1 6 6 ( 2 4 7 ) 9 ( 9 ) 1 5 6 ( 3 4 0 ) 6 ( 3 6 ) PEN M A N ROA D P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 4 N N O T T O S C A L E S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 E s t i m a t e d D i r e c t i o n a l D i s t r i b u t i o n 0 0 % - P E R C E N T D I S T R I B U T I O N 50 % 10% 4 0 % PEN M A N ROA D 8 As shown in Table 1, the development is estimated to generate approximately 365 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday morning peak hour, approximately 245 two-way vehicle trips during the weekday evening peak hour, and 1,450 total vehicle trips during the day. It should be noted that the estimated trips represent the peak hours of the school which in the morning it coincides with the roadway system peak hour while in the evening it occurs prior to the street system peak hour. However, for the purpose of this analysis, the evening trip generation was assumed to coincide with the roadway system’s peak hour. Furthermore, while the school is anticipated to generate some of its traffic from within Prestwick subdivision, it was assumed, in order to further present a conservative analysis, that all trips will be external. Trip Generation Comparison As indicated earlier, the proposed school site within Phase 2 of Prestwick subdivision will replace approximately 84 single-family home sites. Table 2 is proposed summarizing the amount of traffic the eliminated lots will generate utilizing ITE trip generation rates. Table 2 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily ITE Land- Use Code Type/Size In Out Total In Out Total 210 84 Single-Family Homes 17 52 69 76 44 121 894 When compared to the amount of traffic the school will generate at full occupancy, it can be seen that the proposed school will result in an increase of approximately 296 trips during the morning peak hour, 124 trips during the evening peak hour and 556 daily trips. It is important to note that the school trips are conservative in that not all of the trips will be generated externally and that the estimated trips in the evening peak hour will occur before the roadway system peak hour. Projected Traffic Volumes The estimated weekday morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system (Figure 5) in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. In addition to the traffic generated by the development, the study also included traffic that will be generated by the full buildout of the Prestwick subdivision as well as the increase in background traffic assumed at two percent per year applied as required by IDOT over an eleven year period (opening year plus ten) to represent Year 2024. The existing traffic volumes were therefore increased by twenty two percent and combined with the peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed school and buildout of Prestwick subdivision to determine the projected traffic volumes which are shown in Figure 6. P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 5 N N O T T O S C A L E 25 (3 5 ) 1 4 ( 1 7 ) S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 42 (47) SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 8 0 ( 2 5 ) 35 ( 1 5 ) 42 ( 4 7 ) 80 ( 2 5 ) 9 2 ( 3 2 ) 54 (66) 172 (57) 9 6 ( 1 1 3 ) 23 (8) E s t i m a t e d S i t e - G e n e r a t e d T r a f f i c V o l u m e s PEN M A N ROA D P R O J E C T : T I T L E : J o b N o : 1 3 - 1 3 8 F i g u r e : 6 N N O T T O S C A L E 92 (7 0 ) 28 (15) 2 4 ( 2 2 ) S I T E P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 1 P R E S T W I C K S U B D I V I S I O N P H A S E 2 62 (71) SCH O O L H O U S E R O A D ASHLEY ROAD L E G E N D 0 0 ( 0 0 ) - A M P E A K H O U R ( 7 : 3 0 - 8 : 3 0 A M ) - P M P E A K H O U R ( 4 : 0 0 - 5 : 0 0 P M ) P r o j e c t e d T o t a l T r a f f i c V o l u m e s Y o r k v i l l e C h r i s t i a n H i g h S c h o o l 1 2 6 28 (18) 20 (34) 1 4 6 ( 1 4 3 ) 18 (52) 187 (112) 2 0 0 ( 4 4 5 ) 1 0 9 ( 1 1 8 ) 2 3 0 ( 3 1 7 ) 9 5 ( 4 5 ) 103 (105) 25 2 ( 4 9 6 ) 10 ( 2 0 ) 29 7 ( 3 4 7 ) 55 ( 9 0 ) PEN M A N ROA D 11 Site Access Access to the school site will be provided via two access roads: a full ingress-egress access road on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via the existing Penman road and a full ingress/egress access road on Ashley Road via the proposed access road planned to serve Phase 2 of the Prestwick subdivision and the proposed school. Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Penman Road A full ingress/egress access road is provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) via Penman Road. Outbound movements from this access road are under stop control. This approach will operate at acceptable levels of service in the morning and evening peak hours under proposed conditions. A westbound left-turn lane should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) meeting IDOT’s design criteria for 30 mph speed limit (220 feet of taper and 215 feet of storage). An eastbound right-turn lane will be provided based on meeting warrants per Figure 36-3A of the BDE included in the Appendix. Two northbound lanes striped to indicate a separate left-turn lane and separate right-turn lane will also be provided via restriping of the existing pavement. Ashley Road and Proposed Access Road A full ingress/egress access road will be provided on Ashley Road approximately 1,800 feet south of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126). Outbound movements from this access road will be under stop control. Widening of Ashley Road to provide a southbound right-turn lane will be warranted. Traffic Analysis Traffic analyses were performed for the intersections within the study area to determine the operation of the existing roadway system, evaluate the impact of the proposed single family home development, and determine the ability of the existing roadway system to accommodate projected traffic demands. Analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the existing traffic volumes and the projected traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using HCS 2010 computer software, which is based on the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2010. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter grade from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. Control delay is that portion of the total delay attributed to the traffic signal or stop sign control operation and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. Level of Service A is the highest grade (best traffic flow and least delay), Level of Service E represents saturated or at-capacity conditions, and Level of Service F is the lowest grade (oversaturated conditions, extensive delays). For two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersections, levels of service are only calculated for the approaches controlled by a stop sign. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for unsignalized intersections are shown in Table 2. The results of the capacity analysis are summarized in Table 3 for the existing volumes and Table 4 for the projected volumes. 12 Table 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA—UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Average Total Delay (SEC/VEH) A 0 - 10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15 - 25 D > 25 - 35 E > 35 - 50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. Table 3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road B 10.0 B 12.2 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road B 10.7 B 12.3 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. Table 4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS—FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road B 11.9 B 14.3 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road B 12.8 C 15.1 Ashley Road with Proposed Access Road B 10.7 B 10.6 LOS - Level of Service Delay - Measured in seconds. Represents operation of the approach under stop sign control. 13 Traffic Evaluation The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Ashley Road currently operates at an acceptable level of service during morning and evening peak hours. With the additional traffic resulting from the development of the site and the ambient growth, the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. It is recommended that a westbound left-turn lane be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and that Ashley Road be widened to provide two northbound lanes striped to indicate an exclusive left-turn lane and an exclusive right-turn lane. The outbound movements from Ashley Road should continue to be under stop sign control. An eastbound right-turn lane will not be required or warranted. At the intersection of Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) with Penman Road, the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service assuming the provision of a westbound left-turn lane and an eastbound right-turn lane. At the intersection of Ashley Road with the proposed access road, acceptable levels of service are projected to occur with traffic exiting the development under stop sign control. No widening of Ashley Road will be necessary. Conclusion and Recommendations Based on the proposed development plans and the preceding traffic impact study, the following conclusions and recommendations are made. • The addition of the new traffic generated by the proposed school will be accommodated by the roadway system. • Westbound left-turn lanes should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) at its intersections with Ashley Road and Penman Road. • An eastbound right-turn lane should be provided on Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) at its intersection with Penman Road. • A southbound right-turn lane should be provided on Ashley Road at its intersection with the proposed access road. • The two site access roads will be adequate to serve the total traffic that will be generated by the proposed school and full occupancy of Prestwick subdivision. 13-138 Stewart Proposed Yorkville Christian High School September 18 2013 mks lra Appendix tsuguA SNOITCESRETNI sionillI 2012 36-3.2 HARD COPIES UNCONTROLLED Note: For highways with a design speed below 50 mph (80 km/h), with a DHV in one direction of less than 300, and where right turns are greater than 40, an adjustment should be used. To read the vertical axis of the chart, subtract 20 from the actual number of right turns. Example Given: Design Speed = 35 mph (60 km/h) DHV (in one direction) = 250 vph Right Turns = 100 vph Problem: Determine if a right-turn lane is warranted. Solution: To read the vertical axis, use 100 - 20 = 80 vph. The figure indicates that right- turn lane is not necessary, unless other factors (e.g., high crash rate) indicate a lane is needed. GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT-TURN LANES AT UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS Figure 36-3.A PM AM55 90 352 437 Schoolhouse Road (IL 126) and Penman Road Storm Sewer Design Report Latest Revision: August 22, 2013 YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS Prepared for: John & Michelle Stewart 3874 N. IL Route 71 Sheridan, IL 60551 Phone: 815-695-5667 HRG Job: 88130135 Prepared by: Kenneth Gomez, E.I. Staff Engineer David W. Schultz, P.E., LEED AP BD+C Project Manager INDEX DESIGN NOTES TAB 1  Project Location Map  Existing and Previous Conditions  Proposed Conditions DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS/EXHIBITS TAB 2  Rational Method “C” Calculation – Proposed  Proposed Rational C Calculation Map  Rainfall Intensity  Storm Sewer IDF Curves  Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc)  Inlet Capacities per IDOT Design Manual o R-2502-D o R-3015-R o R-3286-8V o R-4340-B  Overall Storm Sewer Pipe Layout Plan View  Hydraflow Storm Sewer Output – 10 YR  Storm Sewer Tabulation EXHIBITS TAB 3  Previous Conditions - Phase 2 Drainage Exhibit  Proposed Drainage Exhibit  Copies from Smith Engineering Consultants Drainage Report & Storm Sizing – Prestwick of Yorkville Phase 2 (Reference)  Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report (Reference) TAB 1 DESIGN NOTES Project location DESIGN NOTES EXISTING AND PREVIOUS CONDITIONS:  Property location is the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois.  The subject property consists of approximately a total of +/- 193.8 acres of which 31.6 acres (Lots formerly known as #273 – #356) is being disturbed for the proposed location of a private school. The project site is located south of Phase 1 on what was previously known as the Prestwick of Yorkville Phase 2 subdivision which is generally located south of IL Route 126 and west of Ashley Road in the United City of Yorkville. The overall land area remains the same with a change in land us from residential to a school lot covering 84 lots, and former Right-of-Way including sidewalk and roadway.  Storm water management and runoff for Lots 273 through 356 along with former Right-of-Way have been previously accounted for in the original development of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision; please refer to the drainage report prepared by Smith Engineering Consultants, dated April 16, 2007 that was previously approved, reference sheets from that report are contained within this report as reference. The proposed tributary area for the proposed area is being tied directly into the existing storm sewer that was previously approved and extended from the storm water management basins, “Basin 2” and “Basin 3B” of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision.  The storm sewer system downstream of Lot 273 through Lot 356 was previously designed by Smith Engineering Consultants to accept the flow from the developed site. As seen on Worksheet 2 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report, Basins 2 and 3B were designed and sized for approximately +/- 65 acres with curve numbers 74 and 73 respectively which is consistent with the areas summarized in the Rational Method “C” Calculation that broke down the two different land uses and compared the impervious areas in the ultimate design. The proposed school site will be phased over time and the entire lot is to be consistent with what was previously accounted for and should be allowed up to approximately +/- 13.3 acres (579,000 sq.ft.) of impervious development on the school site, Lot 1.  At the date of this report, Phase I and portions of Phase 2 stormwater management facilities for the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision have been fully constructed. Currently, there is a 10” drain tile at the downstream end of the Basin 3B restrictor structure (Tag CC) that drains to the west ditch of Ashley Road. This discharge eventually reaches an existing 24” CMP that passes flow to the east side of Ashley Road. The current land owner has since reconnected the existing 10” drain tile to the downstream field tile that had serviced the property historically so the low flow discharges are subsurface in the field tile system and overland flows still remain unchanged and tributary to the existing 24” CMP under Ashley Road. Proposed Conditions:  The proposed storm sewer for Lot 1 (Yorkville Christian School) has been designed on the basis of the ten (10) year storm and rainfall data found within the City of Yorkville watershed and Bulletin 70 data.  The onsite storm sewer has been designed utilizing the Hydraflow Storm Sewer for AutoCad 3D, 2011 which is based on the Rational Method.  Time of concentration was calculated for each of the proposed drainage areas. Time of concentration was assumed to be five (5) minutes for all smaller subareas with a time of concentrations less than 5 minutes which included any areas with buildings.  The proposed Rational C runoff coefficient for the school lot was summarized and compared to the previously designed land use area that contained single- family units and roadway section from the Prestwick of Yorkville Supplemental Report by Smith Engineering Consultants. Although using different methods, these numbers were converted to compare proposed C value of 0.69 to the existing curve number of 74.  Existing Sub-Basins H, L, and Q of Basins 2 and 3B for Prestwick of Yorkville Phase 2 will be used in the proposed stormwater management as the system was previously designed to accept the flow from their respective Sub-Basins in the Prestwick of Yorkville Drainage Report.  Due to the shift in the main access drive off of Ashley Road into the subdivision, the proposed location for stormwater Basin 3C will now be moved south on the opposite side of the main access drive and included in the future improvements because of poor existing soil conditions of where the previous roadway was aligned. Also at the current time the storm sewer has not been extended to Basin 3C as it currently stops at the restrictor manhole CC shown on page 75 of the phase 2 plans. Also while this area is to remain un-platted and as pre- existing conditions the storm sewer is to be extended and installed once future phase 2 plans are re-submitted for permit.  Proposed storm sewer structures are tributary to an existing storm sewer line that will connect to an existing downstream detention basin “Basin 3B” of the existing Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision.  DA-1 and DA-23 parking lot drain directly via curb cuts to the storm water management (SWM) Basin 2. DA-24 drains temporarily via a graded swale directly to SWM Basin 2, and in future development will drain via a proposed storm sewer system.  SWM Basin Q was previously designed in the Prestwick Subdivision to receive the flow from Sub-basins Q1 and Q2. Flows of Sub-Basins H41B, H29A, H41, and H42 (pipe tag numbers 261, 259, 249, 247) in the previously designed Prestwick Subdivision were used for the proposed system in order to determine the downstream flow of Sub-Basin H42 (pipes 243 and 245) going to Basin 3B. Existing flows of Sub-Basins H7 and H11 (pipes 213 and 333B) were used to account for the flow from offsite and going to Sub-Basin H15 (pipe 217) that flows onsite onto DA-14. TAB 2 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Project #:88130135 Project:Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 7/11/2013 Location:Yorkville, Illinois Checked DWS Date 7/11/2013 BASIN AREA AREA AREA %PAVED %GRASSRUNOFF AREA NO.(SQ-FT)PAVEDGRASS0.95 0.5 "C"(acres) PROPOSED YORKVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL SITE - OVERALL PHASE 1 278,289.2209,851.268,438.075%25%0.84 6.39 PHASE 2 112,491.178,071.234,419.969%31%0.81 2.58 FUTURE 986,055.0286,448.2699,606.829%71%0.63 22.64 PR-DA-AVERAGE 1,376,835.3574,370.5802,464.742%58%0.69 31.61 EXISTING SUBDIVISION - PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE UNIT-2 (PHASE 2) PHASE 2 PRESTWICK 1,376,835.3 797,643.0 84 LOTS (LOT #273 – LOT #356)448,674.2 ROADWAY 98,322.5 SIDEWALK 32,195.6 EX-DA-AVERAGE 1,376,835.3579,192.3797,643.042%58%0.69 31.61 PROPOSEDSQ.FT.AC. TOTAL AREA1,376,835.331.61 Pervious Area802,464.718.42 Impervious Area574,370.513.19 % Impervious41.7% EXISTINGSQ.FT.AC. TOTAL AREA1,376,835.331.61 Pervious Area797,643.018.31 Impervious Area579,192.313.30 % Impervious42.1% RATIONAL METHOD "C" CALCULATION Project #:88130135 Project:Yorkville Christian School By KLG Date 7/11/2013 Location:Yorkville, Illinois Checked DWS Date 8/21/2013 BASINAREAAREAAREA%PAVED %GRASSRUNOFFAREA NO.(SQ-FT)PAVEDGRASS0.950.5"C"(acres) PROPOSED DA-196,190.358,337.437,852.961%39%0.772.21 DA-223,470.919,929.13,541.885%15%0.880.54 DA-330,653.820,439.1 10,214.7 67%33%0.800.70 DA-425,884.616,683.79,200.964%36%0.790.59 DA-514,556.713,313.11,243.691%9%0.910.33 DA-616,316.814,938.61,378.292%8%0.910.37 DA-79,268.18,904.9363.296%4%0.930.21 DA-828,450.226,531.11,919.093%7%0.920.65 DA-914,557.814,229.2328.598%2%0.940.33 DA-1020,008.213,834.76,173.569%31%0.810.46 DA-11 15,823.7 9,712.76,111.061%39%0.780.36 DA-1210,222.36,348.43,873.962%38%0.780.23 DA-137,555.66,245.01,310.683%17%0.870.17 DA-1423,234.117,802.65,431.677%23%0.840.53 DA-1517,806.111,324.96,481.264%36%0.790.41 DA-166,636.33,021.43,614.946%54%0.700.15 DA-1717,593.43,763.713,829.721%79%0.600.40 DA-189,304.9680.68,624.37%93%0.530.21 DA-199,246.19,246.10.0100%0%0.950.21 DA-209,437.39,437.30.0100%0%0.950.22 DA-212,770.12,770.10.0100%0%0.950.06 DA-223,513.73,513.70.0100%0%0.950.08 DA-2346,838.540,013.86,824.785%15%0.881.08 DA-24504,718.7105,284.5399,434.221%79%0.5911.59 DA-25372,127.8112,076.5260,051.230%70%0.648.54 DA-2640,649.325,988.214,661.164%36%0.790.93 DA-AVERAGE1,376,835574,370802,46542%58%0.6931.61 PROPOSEDSQ.FT.AC. TOTAL AREA1,376,835.331.61 Pervious Area802,464.918.42 Impervious Area574,370.413.19 % Impervious 41.7% RATIONAL METHOD "C" CALCULATION 80 40 2 0 0 Bulletin 70 - Figure 14 Derived Rainfall Intensities (Yorkville) Duration 10 yr 25 yr 50 yr 100 yr (min)RainfallAvg. IRainfallAvg. IRainfallAvg. IRainfallAvg. I 5 0.586.910.708.350.829.790.9811.81 6 0.666.620.808.000.949.381.1311.32 7 0.756.420.907.761.069.091.2810.96 8 0.846.261.017.571.188.871.4310.70 9 0.926.141.117.421.318.701.5710.50 10 1.016.051.227.31 1.438.571.7210.33 11 1.075.811.297.02 1.518.231.829.93 12 1.125.621.366.79 1.597.961.929.59 13 1.185.451.436.59 1.677.722.029.31 14 1.245.311.506.41 1.757.522.129.07 15 1.305.181.576.26 1.847.342.218.86 16 1.334.981.606.02 1.887.062.278.51 17 1.364.801.645.80 1.936.802.328.20 18 1.394.641.685.61 1.976.572.387.93 19 1.424.501.725.43 2.026.372.437.68 20 1.464.371.765.28 2.066.192.497.46 21 1.494.251.805.14 2.116.022.547.26 22 1.524.151.845.01 2.155.872.607.08 23 1.554.051.884.89 2.205.742.656.92 24 1.583.961.914.79 2.245.612.716.77 25 1.623.881.954.69 2.295.492.766.63 26 1.653.801.994.60 2.335.392.826.50 27 1.683.732.034.51 2.385.292.876.38 28 1.713.672.074.43 2.435.202.926.27 29 1.743.612.114.36 2.475.112.986.16 30 1.783.552.154.29 2.525.033.036.07 31 1.803.472.174.20 2.544.923.075.94 32 1.813.402.194.11 2.574.823.105.81 33 1.833.332.224.03 2.604.723.135.70 34 1.853.272.243.95 2.624.633.175.59 35 1.873.212.263.88 2.654.553.205.48 36 1.893.152.293.81 2.684.473.235.38 37 1.913.102.313.74 2.714.393.265.29 38 1.933.052.333.68 2.734.323.305.20 39 1.953.002.353.62 2.764.253.335.12 40 1.972.952.383.57 2.794.183.365.04 41 1.992.912.403.51 2.824.123.394.97 42 2.012.872.423.46 2.844.063.434.90 43 2.032.832.453.42 2.874.003.464.83 44 2.042.792.473.37 2.903.953.494.76 45 2.062.752.493.33 2.923.903.534.70 50 2.162.592.613.13 3.063.673.694.43 60 2.262.262.732.73 3.203.203.853.85 (hours) 1 2.262.262.732.733.203.203.853.85 2 2.781.393.361.683.941.974.762.38 3 3.071.023.711.244.351.455.251.75 6 3.600.604.350.735.100.856.151.03 12 4.180.355.050.42 5.920.497.130.59 18 4.510.255.450.30 6.390.367.710.43 24 4.80.205.80.246.80.288.20.34 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 05101520253035404550 In t e n s i t y ( i n / h r ) Duration (minutes) Bulletin 70, Figure 14 -YORKVILLE Intensity vs. Duration Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.016 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.27=0.2716.38971 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft106 316 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.015 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s2.490.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.00=0.01 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.28 17.09931 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 1 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.054 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.17=0.1710.07539 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft 185 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.017 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s0.002.10 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.02=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.19 11.54107 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 2 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.096 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.13=0.138.004068 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft151 68 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.02860.055 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.443.78 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.15 9.03564 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 3 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.33=0.3319.77968 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft281 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.0345 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.780.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.35 21.02004 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 4 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft1000 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0110.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.03+0.00=0.031.578954 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft95 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.004 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s1.290.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.05 2.81048 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. 8/21/2013 Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School DA 5 KLG DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft1000 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0370.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.02+0.00=0.020.971955 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft130 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.037 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.910.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.00=0.01 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.03 1.52606 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 6 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft290 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0150.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.01+0.00=0.010.518094 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft95 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.015 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s2.490.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.00=0.01 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.02 1.154051 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 7 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft00 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.00=0.000 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft284 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.034 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.750.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.02 1.262783 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 8 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft1000 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0110.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.03+0.00=0.031.578954 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft18 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.0033 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s1.170.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.03 1.835855 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 9 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.007 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.38=0.3822.81288 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft0 116 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0 0.007 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s0.001.35 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.02=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.40 24.24507 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 10 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft3268 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0350.035 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.01+0.15=0.159.201772 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft295 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.03 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.520.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.18 10.59818 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 11 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft012 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.06=0.063.62714 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft164 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.006 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s1.570.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.03+0.00=0.03 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.09 5.363013 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 12 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft08 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.015 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.04=0.042.229743 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft165 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.015 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s2.490.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.06 3.3343 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 13 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft00 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.00=0.000 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft364 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.026 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.280.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.03+0.00=0.03 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.03 1.850821 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 14 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft00 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.01 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.00=0.000 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft286 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.033 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.690.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.02+0.00=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.02 1.2908 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 15 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft2179 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.0520.052 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.14=0.158.714095 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft41 0 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.067 0 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s5.260.00 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.15 8.843961 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 16 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.036 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.20=0.2011.84945 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft85 119 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.0360.036 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s3.863.06 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.01=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.21 12.86462 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 17 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.064 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.16=0.169.413417 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft0 35 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0 0.027 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s0.002.65 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.16 9.633446 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 18 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.087 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.14=0.148.325524 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft373 13 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.0150.087 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s2.494.76 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.04+0.00=0.04 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.18 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 23 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.0039 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.48=0.4828.8266 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft0 1242 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0 0.0039 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s0.001.01 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.34=0.34 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.82 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 24 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.011 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.32=0.3219.03979 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft61 568 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.00740.031 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s1.752.84 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.01+0.06=0.07 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.38 22.95361 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 25 DWS Worksheet 3: Time of concentration (Tc) or travel time (Tt) Project By Date Location Checked Date Circle one:PresentDeveloped Circle one:Tc NOTES:Space for as many as two segments per flow type can be used for each worksheet. Include a map, schematic, or description of flow segments. Sheet Flow (Applicable to Tc only)Segment ID 1. Surface description (table 3-1)PU 2. Mannings roughness coeff., (table 3-1)0.0110.24 3. Flow Length, L (total L not >100 ft)ft0100 4. Two-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2in3.042.9 5. Land Slope, sft/ft0.010.029 6. Tt = (0.007(nL)^0.8)/(P2^0.5*s^0.4)hr0.00+0.22=0.2212.91993 Shallow Concentrated flow 7. Surface Description (paved,"P" or unpaved,"U")P UU or P only 8. Flow length, L ft9 140 9. Watercourse slope, s ft/ft0.0180.018 10. Average velocity V (figure 3-1)ft/s2.732.16 11. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.02=0.02 Channel Flow 12. Cross sectional flow area, a ft^20 0 13. Wetted perimeter, Pw ft0 0 14. Hydraulic radius. R=a/Pw ft0 0 15. Channel Slope, s ft/ft0.010.01 16. Mannings roughness coeff., n 0.0350.035 17. V=(1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(1/2))/n ft/s0.000.00 18. Flow length, L ft0 0 19. Tt = L/3600V hr0.00+0.00=0.00 20. Watershed or subarea Tc or Tt (add Tt in steps 6, 11, and 19)hr 0.23 Table 3.1 - Roughness coefficients (Manning's n) for sheet flow Smoth surfaces (concrete, asphale, gravel, or bare soil0.011 Fallow (no residue)0.05 Cultivated soils: Residue cover < 20%0.06 Residue cover >20%0.17 Grass: Short Grass Prairie0.15 Dense Grasses (blue grass, native grass mixtures)0.24 Bermudagrass0.41 Range (natural)0.13 Woods: Light underbrush0.40 Dense underbrush0.80 Note: when selecting n in woods consider cover to a height of about 0.1 ft. Tt through subarea Yorkville Christian School KLG 8/21/2013 DA 26 DWS Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-2502 TY D Grate 0.9 = Free open area of grate (sq. ft.) 6 = Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) ---- Capacity Calculation ----- WeirOrificeNetWeir/OrificeFlow Type PondingEquationEquationCapacityratio 0.050.200.970.200.21Weir Flow 0.100.571.370.570.42Weir Flow 0.151.051.681.050.62Weir Flow 0.171.261.791.220.71Transition Flow 0.201.611.941.420.83Transition Flow 0.252.252.171.771.04Transition Flow 0.302.962.372.131.25Transition Flow 0.353.732.562.521.45Transition Flow 0.404.552.742.741.66Orifice Flow 0.455.432.912.911.87Orifice Flow 0.506.363.063.062.08Orifice Flow 0.557.343.213.212.28Orifice Flow 0.608.373.363.362.49Orifice Flow 0.659.433.493.492.70Orifice Flow 0.7010.543.633.632.91Orifice Flow 0.7511.693.753.753.12Orifice Flow 1.0018.004.334.334.15Orifice Flow 1.2525.164.844.845.19Orifice Flow 1.5033.075.315.316.23Orifice Flow 1.7541.675.735.737.27Orifice Flow 2.0050.916.136.138.31Orifice Flow 2.2560.756.506.509.35Orifice Flow 2.5071.156.856.8510.38Orifice Flow 2.7582.097.197.1911.42Orifice Flow 3.0093.537.517.5112.46Orifice Flow 3.25105.467.817.8113.50Orifice Flow 3.50117.868.118.1114.54Orifice Flow 3.75130.718.398.3915.58Orifice Flow 4.00144.008.678.6716.61Orifice Flow 4.25157.718.938.9317.65Orifice Flow 4.50171.839.199.1918.69Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5Weir equation where: A= free open area of grate P= weir perimeter h= feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80% of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-3015-R (City of Yorkville) 1.1 = Free open area of grate (sq. ft.) 4.6 = Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) ---- Capacity Calculation ----- WeirOrificeNetWeir/OrificeFlow Type PondingEquationEquationCapacityratio 0.050.151.180.150.13Weir Flow 0.100.441.670.440.26Weir Flow 0.150.802.050.800.39Weir Flow 0.170.972.180.970.44Weir Flow 0.201.232.371.230.52Weir Flow 0.251.732.651.730.65Weir Flow 0.302.272.902.070.78Transition Flow 0.352.863.132.400.91Transition Flow 0.403.493.352.741.04Transition Flow 0.454.173.553.091.17Transition Flow 0.504.883.753.451.30Transition Flow 0.555.633.933.821.43Transition Flow 0.606.414.104.101.56Orifice Flow 0.657.234.274.271.69Orifice Flow 0.708.084.434.431.82Orifice Flow 0.75 8.96 4.59 4.59 1.95 Orifice Flow 0.8510.814.884.882.21Orifice Flow 1.0013.805.305.302.61Orifice Flow 1.2519.295.925.923.26Orifice Flow 1.5025.356.496.493.91Orifice Flow 1.7531.957.017.014.56Orifice Flow 2.0039.037.497.495.21Orifice Flow 2.2546.587.947.945.86Orifice Flow 2.5054.558.378.376.51Orifice Flow 2.7562.938.788.787.17Orifice Flow 3.0071.719.179.177.82Orifice Flow 3.2580.859.559.558.47Orifice Flow 3.5090.369.919.919.12Orifice Flow 3.75100.2110.2610.269.77Orifice Flow 4.00110.4010.5910.5910.42Orifice Flow 4.25120.9110.9210.9211.07Orifice Flow 4.50131.7311.2411.2411.72Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A= free open area of grate P= weir perimeter h= feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80% of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-3286-8V (City of Yorkville) 0.7 = Free open area of grate (sq. ft.) 4.4 = Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) ---- Capacity Calculation ----- WeirOrificeNetWeir/OrificeFlow Type PondingEquationEquationCapacityratio 0.050.150.750.150.20Weir Flow 0.100.421.070.420.39Weir Flow 0.150.771.310.770.59Weir Flow 0.170.931.390.930.67Weir Flow 0.201.181.511.080.78Transition Flow 0.251.651.691.330.98Transition Flow 0.302.171.851.611.17Transition Flow 0.352.731.991.891.37Transition Flow 0.403.342.132.131.57Orifice Flow 0.453.982.262.261.76Orifice Flow 0.504.672.382.381.96Orifice Flow 0.555.382.502.502.15Orifice Flow 0.606.132.612.612.35Orifice Flow 0.656.922.722.722.55Orifice Flow 0.707.732.822.822.74Orifice Flow 0.75 8.57 2.92 2.92 2.94 Orifice Flow 0.8510.343.113.113.33Orifice Flow 1.0013.203.373.373.92Orifice Flow 1.2518.453.773.774.90Orifice Flow 1.5024.254.134.135.87Orifice Flow 1.7530.564.464.466.85Orifice Flow 2.0037.344.774.777.83Orifice Flow 2.2544.555.065.068.81Orifice Flow 2.5052.185.335.339.79Orifice Flow 2.7560.205.595.5910.77Orifice Flow 3.0068.595.845.8411.75Orifice Flow 3.2577.346.086.0812.73Orifice Flow 3.5086.436.316.3113.71Orifice Flow 3.7595.866.536.5314.69Orifice Flow 4.00105.606.746.7415.67Orifice Flow 4.25115.656.956.9516.64Orifice Flow 4.50126.017.157.1517.62Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A= free open area of grate P= weir perimeter h= feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80% of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. Inlet Capacities per DOT Design Manual Neenah R-4340-B 1.1 = Free open area of grate (sq. ft.) 6 = Weir Perimeter of grate (ft.) ---- Capacity Calculation ----- WeirOrificeNetWeir/OrificeFlow Type PondingEquationEquationCapacityratio 0.050.201.180.200.17Weir Flow 0.100.571.670.570.34Weir Flow 0.151.052.051.050.51Weir Flow 0.171.262.181.260.58Weir Flow 0.201.612.371.590.68Transition Flow 0.252.252.651.960.85Transition Flow 0.302.962.902.341.02Transition Flow 0.353.733.132.741.19Transition Flow 0.404.553.353.161.36Transition Flow 0.455.433.553.551.53Orifice Flow 0.506.363.753.751.70Orifice Flow 0.557.343.933.931.87Orifice Flow 0.608.374.104.102.04Orifice Flow 0.659.434.274.272.21Orifice Flow 0.7010.544.434.432.38Orifice Flow 0.7511.694.594.592.55Orifice Flow 1.0018.005.305.303.40Orifice Flow 1.2525.165.925.924.25Orifice Flow 1.5033.076.496.495.10Orifice Flow 1.7541.677.017.015.95Orifice Flow 2.0050.917.497.496.80Orifice Flow 2.2560.757.947.947.65Orifice Flow 2.5071.158.378.378.50Orifice Flow 2.7582.098.788.789.35Orifice Flow 3.0093.539.179.1710.20Orifice Flow 3.25105.469.559.5511.05Orifice Flow 3.50117.869.919.9111.89Orifice Flow 3.75130.7110.2610.2612.74Orifice Flow 4.00144.0010.5910.5913.59Orifice Flow 4.25157.7110.9210.9214.44Orifice Flow 4.50171.8311.2411.2415.29Orifice Flow Notes: Equations used Q=0.6A(2gh)^0.5 Orifice equation Q=3P(h)^1.5 Weir equation where: A= free open area of grate P= weir perimeter h= feet of head (ponding depth) g= 32.2 feet per sec/sec Q=capacity of grate in CFS Net total flow is the lower of the two equations except where the the ratio of the two solutions is between 0.667 and 1.5. In the latter case the net flow is 80% of the average of the two solutions as an approximation of transitional flow. TAB 3 EXHIBITS EX - D A 40 20 1 0 0 ST O R M S E W E R C O M P U T A T I O N S H E E T BA S I N H PR E S T W I C K O F Y O R K V I L L E - P h a s e 2 CO M P U T E D B Y : G E K D A T E : 5 / 2 5 / 2 0 0 6 JO B N O : YK F D - 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - 0 3 C H E C K E D B Y : D W S U P D A T E D : 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 7 D R A I N A G E A R E A RU N O F F FL O W T I M E RA I N F A L L T O T A L I N L E T B Y P A S S P I P E C A P A C I T Y V E L O C I T Y (FT/SEC)INVERT ELEVATIONPIPE BA S I N PI P E L E N G T H ( A C R E S ) CO E F F . "A " x " C " (M I N U T E ) IN T E N S I T Y R U N O F F C A P A C I T Y F L O W D I A M E T E R F U L L FLOWINGDESIGNUPPERLOWERSLOPE TA G # ( F E E T ) IN C R E M E N T T O T A L "C " IN C R E M E N T T O T A L TO U P P E R E N D I N S E C T I O N (I N C H / H O U R ) ( C F S ) ( C F S ) (I N C H E S ) ( C F S ) FULLFLOWENDENDFT/FT H1 20 1 2 7 0 . 5 1 0. 5 1 0. 7 1 0. 3 6 0 . 3 6 1 0 . 9 0 0 . 1 7 5. 8 9 1. 0 5 1 . 0 5 1 . 0 9 12 2.172.762.73722.90722.800.0037201 H2 20 3 1 6 6 0 . 4 1 0. 9 2 0. 7 1 0. 2 9 0 . 6 6 1 1 . 0 7 0 . 9 5 5. 8 6 1. 8 9 0 . 9 7 0 . 8 7 12 2.052.612.90722.80722.250.0033203 H3 34 5 67 0 . 2 6 0. 2 6 0. 5 8 0. 1 5 0 . 1 5 9 . 4 0 0 . 2 9 6. 1 5 0. 9 3 12 3.774.803.83722.40721.650.0112345 H4 20 7 6 7 0 . 2 5 2. 4 3 0. 5 8 0. 1 5 1 . 5 3 1 1 . 8 9 0 . 1 7 5. 7 2 6. 7 9 15 7.285.936.54721.55720.700.0127207 H5 34 1 10 3 0 . 5 7 0. 5 7 0. 5 8 0. 3 3 0 . 3 3 1 4 . 0 0 0 . 5 0 5. 3 5 1. 7 7 12 2.493.183.44722.30721.800.0049341 H6 34 3 5 6 0 . 4 2 0. 9 9 0. 5 8 0. 2 4 0 . 5 7 1 4 . 5 0 0 . 2 5 5. 2 7 3. 0 2 15 4.313.513.80721.80721.550.0045343 H7 20 9 12 8 0 . 3 2 2. 7 5 0. 5 8 0. 1 8 1 . 7 1 1 4 . 7 4 0 . 4 2 5. 2 2 6. 9 9 18 7.764.395.05720.50719.800.0055209 21 1 74 2. 7 5 0. 0 0 1 . 7 1 1 5 . 1 7 0 . 2 5 5. 1 5 6. 8 7 18 7.724.375.01719.80719.400.0054211 21 3 13 8 2. 7 5 0. 0 0 1 . 7 1 1 5 . 4 1 0 . 4 8 5. 1 1 6. 8 0 18 7.484.234.81719.40718.700.0051213 H7 A 32 3 42 0 . 6 5 0. 6 5 0. 7 1 0. 4 6 0 . 4 6 1 2 . 4 0 0 . 1 5 5. 6 3 1. 1 6 1 . 1 6 1 . 4 5 12 4.605.864.71720.00719.300.0167323 H8 32 5 2 6 0 . 5 3 1. 1 8 0. 7 1 0. 3 7 0 . 8 4 1 2 . 5 5 0 . 0 6 5. 6 1 7. 0 2 15 8.016.547.47719.10718.700.0154325 H9 32 7 61 0 . 4 0 1. 5 8 0. 7 1 0. 2 8 1 . 1 2 1 2 . 6 1 0 . 1 8 5. 6 0 7. 3 8 18 8.534.835.51718.50718.100.0066327 H1 0 32 9 2 6 0 . 2 4 1. 8 3 0. 7 1 0. 1 7 1 . 3 0 1 2 . 7 9 0 . 0 6 5. 5 6 7. 2 1 18 11.266.386.74718.10717.800.0115329 H1 1 33 1 21 0 . 9 1 2. 7 4 0. 7 1 0. 6 5 1 . 9 4 1 2 . 8 6 0 . 0 5 5. 5 5 10 . 7 9 21 15.446.426.94717.60717.400.0095331 33 3 71 2. 7 4 0. 0 0 1 . 9 4 1 2 . 9 1 0 . 2 5 5. 5 4 10 . 7 8 21 11.094.614.81717.40717.050.0049333 33 3 B 62 2. 7 4 0. 0 0 1 . 9 4 1 3 . 1 5 0 . 1 8 5. 5 0 10 . 6 9 21 11.854.935.66717.05716.700.0056333B H1 2 34 7 7 5 0 . 3 4 0. 3 4 0. 5 8 0. 2 0 0 . 2 0 1 5 . 4 0 0 . 3 8 5. 1 2 1. 0 1 12 2.923.713.27720.50720.000.0067347 H1 3 34 9 60 0 . 3 2 0. 6 6 0. 5 8 0. 1 8 0 . 3 8 1 5 . 7 8 0 . 2 3 5. 0 5 1. 9 3 12 3.244.134.29720.00719.500.0083349 H1 4 21 5 5 8 0 . 2 5 2. 9 9 0. 5 8 0. 1 4 1 . 8 5 1 6 . 0 1 0 . 1 2 5. 0 2 7. 3 4 18 13.777.807.90718.70717.700.0172215 H1 5 21 7 75 0 . 2 8 6. 6 6 0. 5 8 0. 1 6 4. 3 4 1 6 . 1 4 0 . 3 1 5. 0 0 21 . 6 8 27 16.094.054.05716.70716.500.0027217 21 9 87 6. 6 6 0 . 0 0 4 . 3 4 1 6 . 4 5 0 . 1 9 4. 9 5 21 . 4 6 27 27.696.977.74716.50715.800.0080219 \\ h r g y v n a s \ D a t a \ 8 8 1 3 0 1 3 5 \ D e s i g n \ C a l c \ S t o r m \ 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - P H A S E 2 - S T O R M - R U N - B A S I N H . x l s Page 1 ST O R M S E W E R C O M P U T A T I O N S H E E T BA S I N H PR E S T W I C K O F Y O R K V I L L E - P h a s e 2 CO M P U T E D B Y : G E K D A T E : 5 / 2 5 / 2 0 0 6 JO B N O : YK F D - 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - 0 3 C H E C K E D B Y : D W S U P D A T E D : 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 7 D R A I N A G E A R E A RU N O F F FL O W T I M E RA I N F A L L T O T A L I N L E T B Y P A S S P I P E C A P A C I T Y V E L O C I T Y (FT/SEC)INVERT ELEVATIONPIPE BA S I N PI P E L E N G T H ( A C R E S ) CO E F F . "A " x " C " (M I N U T E ) IN T E N S I T Y R U N O F F C A P A C I T Y F L O W D I A M E T E R F U L L FLOWINGDESIGNUPPERLOWERSLOPE TA G # ( F E E T ) IN C R E M E N T T O T A L "C " IN C R E M E N T T O T A L TO U P P E R E N D I N S E C T I O N (I N C H / H O U R ) ( C F S ) ( C F S ) (I N C H E S ) ( C F S ) FULLFLOWENDENDFT/FT H1 6 31 7 2 6 0 . 9 1 0. 9 1 0. 7 1 0. 6 5 0 . 6 5 9 . 6 0 0 . 0 7 6. 1 2 3. 9 5 12 4.425.636.47718.20717.800.0154317 H1 7 31 9 18 0 . 6 1 1. 5 2 0. 7 1 0. 4 3 1 . 0 8 9 . 6 7 0 . 0 4 6. 1 1 6. 6 0 15 8.276.747.55717.60717.300.0164319 22 1 15 5 8. 1 8 0. 0 0 5 . 4 2 1 6 . 6 3 0 . 3 5 4. 9 2 26 . 6 4 27 27.786.997.42715.60714.350.0081221 H1 8 2 2 3 2 7 0 . 3 1 8. 4 9 0. 5 8 0. 1 8 5 . 6 0 1 6 . 9 8 0 . 0 6 4. 8 6 27 . 2 0 27 28.547.187.69714.35714.120.0085223 H1 9 31 3 45 0 . 2 8 0. 2 8 0. 5 8 0. 1 6 0 . 1 6 8 . 7 0 0 . 1 9 6. 2 7 1. 0 1 12 3.754.783.92715.00714.500.0111313 22 5 1 4 1 8. 7 7 0 . 0 0 5 . 7 6 1 7 . 0 4 0 . 3 0 4. 8 5 27 . 9 3 27 29.217.357.83712.00710.750.0089225 H2 0 2 2 7 1 5 0 0 . 8 2 9. 5 8 0. 5 8 0. 4 7 6 . 2 3 1 7 . 3 4 0 . 3 2 4. 8 0 29 . 9 2 27 30.417.667.84710.75709.300.0097227 H2 1 22 9 15 5 0 . 5 4 10 . 1 3 0. 5 8 0. 3 2 6 . 5 5 1 7 . 6 6 0 . 3 6 4. 7 5 31 . 1 0 30 32.936.717.28709.30708.300.0065229 H2 2 2 3 1 1 3 6 0 . 6 5 10 . 7 7 0. 5 8 0. 3 8 6 . 9 2 1 8 . 0 1 0 . 4 1 4. 6 9 32 . 4 8 30 27.205.555.55707.50706.900.0044231 H2 3 23 3 58 0 . 5 3 11 . 3 0 0. 5 8 0. 3 1 7 . 2 3 1 8 . 4 2 0 . 1 4 4. 6 3 33 . 4 3 30 34.066.947.14706.55706.150.0069233 H2 4 23 5 5 7 0 . 3 9 11 . 6 9 0. 5 8 0. 2 2 7 . 4 5 1 8 . 5 6 0 . 1 2 4. 6 0 34 . 3 1 30 36.247.397.98705.95705.500.0078235 H2 5 23 7 57 0 . 1 9 11 . 8 7 0. 5 8 0. 1 1 7 . 5 6 1 8 . 6 8 0 . 1 2 4. 5 8 34 . 6 6 30 36.217.387.86705.50705.060.0078237 H2 6 23 9 1 4 1 0 . 3 0 12 . 1 8 0. 5 8 0. 1 8 7 . 7 4 1 8 . 8 0 0 . 3 6 4. 5 6 35 . 3 2 36 39.675.626.44704.50704.000.0035239 24 1 1 3 2 12 . 1 8 0. 0 0 7 . 7 4 1 9 . 1 6 0 . 3 3 4. 5 1 34 . 8 6 36 41.105.826.60703.50703.000.0038241 H2 7 29 9 27 0 . 5 3 0. 5 3 0. 7 1 0. 3 8 0 . 3 8 1 1 . 8 0 0 . 1 0 5. 7 4 1. 0 9 1 . 0 9 1 . 0 8 12 4.335.524.43711.60711.200.0148299 H2 8 30 1 1 6 8 0 . 5 7 1. 1 0 0. 7 1 0. 4 0 0 . 7 8 1 1 . 9 0 0 . 4 3 5. 7 2 2. 1 8 1 . 1 3 1 . 2 0 12 5.637.186.54711.20707.000.0250301 H4 1 B 26 1 27 0 . 5 2 0. 5 2 0. 7 1 0. 3 7 0 . 3 7 1 0 . 2 0 0 . 1 0 6. 0 2 1. 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 . 1 2 12 4.335.524.45705.00704.600.0148261 H2 9 A 25 9 49 0 . 3 7 0. 8 9 0. 7 1 0. 2 6 0 . 6 3 1 2 . 5 0 0 . 1 9 5. 6 2 1. 8 6 0 . 8 9 0 . 5 7 12 3.234.114.24704.60704.200.0082259 H2 9 25 7 26 0 . 7 4 1. 6 3 0. 7 1 0. 5 3 1 . 5 6 1 2 . 6 9 0 . 0 6 5. 5 8 10 . 3 6 18 12.116.867.80703.80703.450.0133257 H3 0 25 5 2 3 0 . 7 1 2. 3 4 0. 7 1 0. 5 0 1 . 6 6 1 2 . 7 5 0 . 0 5 5. 5 7 13 . 2 2 18 13.577.697.98703.45703.060.0167255 H3 1 30 5 26 0 . 7 9 0. 7 9 0. 7 1 0. 5 6 0 . 5 6 1 1 . 1 0 0 . 0 7 5. 8 6 3. 2 8 12 4.425.636.18716.20715.800.0154305 H3 2 30 7 2 7 0 . 8 1 1. 6 0 0. 7 1 0. 5 8 1 . 1 4 1 1 . 1 7 0 . 0 6 5. 8 5 6. 6 4 15 7.866.417.26715.80715.400.0148307 30 9 1 5 0 1. 6 0 0. 0 0 1 . 1 4 1 1 . 2 3 0 . 3 7 5. 8 4 6. 6 3 15 7.285.936.73715.40713.500.0127309 \\ h r g y v n a s \ D a t a \ 8 8 1 3 0 1 3 5 \ D e s i g n \ C a l c \ S t o r m \ 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - P H A S E 2 - S T O R M - R U N - B A S I N H . x l s Page 2 ST O R M S E W E R C O M P U T A T I O N S H E E T BA S I N H PR E S T W I C K O F Y O R K V I L L E - P h a s e 2 CO M P U T E D B Y : G E K D A T E : 5 / 2 5 / 2 0 0 6 JO B N O : YK F D - 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - 0 3 C H E C K E D B Y : D W S U P D A T E D : 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 0 7 D R A I N A G E A R E A RU N O F F FL O W T I M E RA I N F A L L T O T A L I N L E T B Y P A S S P I P E C A P A C I T Y V E L O C I T Y (FT/SEC)INVERT ELEVATIONPIPE BA S I N PI P E L E N G T H ( A C R E S ) CO E F F . "A " x " C " (M I N U T E ) IN T E N S I T Y R U N O F F C A P A C I T Y F L O W D I A M E T E R F U L L FLOWINGDESIGNUPPERLOWERSLOPE TA G # ( F E E T ) IN C R E M E N T T O T A L "C " IN C R E M E N T T O T A L TO U P P E R E N D I N S E C T I O N (I N C H / H O U R ) ( C F S ) ( C F S ) (I N C H E S ) ( C F S ) FULLFLOWENDENDFT/FT 27 1 46 0 . 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6. 9 1 0. 0 0 12 5.256.690.00716.00715.000.0217271 H3 3 27 3 16 7 0 . 6 5 0. 6 6 0. 5 8 0. 3 8 0 . 3 8 7 . 4 0 0 . 6 2 6. 5 0 2. 4 7 12 3.154.014.46715.00713.700.0078273 H3 4 2 7 5 1 5 1 0 . 6 7 2. 9 2 0. 5 8 0. 3 9 1 . 9 0 1 1 . 6 0 0 . 3 2 5. 7 7 10 . 9 8 18 12.096.857.78713.30711.300.0133275 H3 5 27 7 12 4 0 . 6 4 3. 5 6 0. 5 8 0. 3 7 2 . 2 7 1 1 . 9 3 0 . 2 6 5. 7 1 13 . 0 0 18 13.327.557.82710.50708.500.0161277 27 9 81 3. 5 6 0 . 0 0 2 . 2 7 1 2 . 1 9 0 . 1 7 5. 6 7 12 . 8 9 18 13.327.557.91708.00706.700.0161279 H3 6 2 8 1 8 2 0 . 7 9 5. 4 5 0. 5 8 0. 4 6 3 . 5 1 1 2 . 3 3 0 . 1 8 5. 6 4 17 . 5 3 24 21.576.877.72706.50705.750.0091281 H3 7 28 3 92 0 . 3 9 5. 8 4 0. 5 8 0. 2 3 3 . 7 4 1 2 . 5 1 0 . 2 1 5. 6 1 18 . 6 9 27 26.996.797.32705.10704.400.0076283 H3 8 2 8 5 7 6 0 . 5 4 6. 3 7 0. 5 8 0. 3 1 4 . 0 5 1 2 . 7 2 0 . 1 6 5. 5 8 20 . 2 9 27 28.717.237.82704.40703.750.0086285 28 7 1 3 6 8. 2 6 0 . 0 0 5 . 3 9 1 2 . 8 8 0 . 3 0 5. 5 5 29 . 4 5 36 51.227.257.47703.60702.800.0059287 H3 9 29 3 26 0 . 7 5 0. 7 5 0. 7 1 0. 5 3 0 . 5 3 1 0 . 5 0 0 . 0 7 5. 9 6 3. 1 7 12 4.425.636.12708.90708.500.0154293 H4 0 29 5 1 6 9 0 . 8 0 1. 5 5 0. 7 1 0. 5 7 1 . 1 0 1 0 . 5 7 0 . 4 5 5. 9 5 6. 5 6 15 7.025.736.30708.50706.500.0118295 H4 1 A 2 8 9 6 0 0 . 3 4 0. 3 4 0. 7 1 0. 2 4 0 . 2 4 1 0 . 2 0 0 . 2 4 6. 0 2 0. 8 8 0 . 8 8 0 . 5 7 12 4.365.564.17706.90706.000.0150289 H4 1 24 9 26 0 . 6 0 0. 6 0 0. 7 1 0. 4 3 0 . 4 3 9 . 0 0 0 . 0 7 6. 2 2 4. 3 4 15 8.016.546.64704.40704.000.0154249 H4 2 24 7 2 6 0 . 4 7 1. 0 7 0. 7 1 0. 3 3 0 . 7 6 9 . 0 7 0 . 0 6 6. 2 1 6. 3 9 15 7.966.497.28704.00703.600.0152247 24 3 6 9 23 . 8 5 0. 0 0 1 5 . 5 4 1 9 . 5 0 0 . 1 5 4. 4 5 69 . 1 9 42 71.127.407.70702.10701.760.0050243 24 5 1 5 8 23 . 8 5 0. 0 0 1 5 . 5 4 1 9 . 6 5 0 . 3 7 4. 4 3 68 . 8 2 42 67.847.067.06697.72697.000.0046245 \\ h r g y v n a s \ D a t a \ 8 8 1 3 0 1 3 5 \ D e s i g n \ C a l c \ S t o r m \ 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - P H A S E 2 - S T O R M - R U N - B A S I N H . x l s Page 3 ST O R M S E W E R C O M P U T A T I O N S H E E T BA S I N Q PR E S T W I C K O F Y O R K V I L L E - P h a s e 2 CO M P U T E D B Y : G E K D A T E : JO B N O : YK F D - 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - 0 3 C H E C K E D B Y : D W S U P D A T E D D R A I N A G E A R E A RU N O F F FL O W T I M E RA I N F A L L T O T A L P I P E C A P A C I T Y V E L O C I T Y (FT/SEC)INVERT ELEVATIONPIPE BA S I N PI P E L E N G T H ( A C R E S ) CO E F F . "A " x " C " (M I N U T E ) IN T E N S I T Y R U N O F F D I A M E T E R F U L L FLOWINGDESIGNUPPERLOWERSLOPE TA G # ( F E E T ) IN C R E M E N T T O T A L "C " IN C R E M E N T T O T A L TO U P P E R E N D I N S E C T I O N (I N C H / H O U R(C F S ) ( I N C H E S ) ( C F S ) FULLFLOWENDENDFT/FT Q1 78 6 2 6 0 . 8 7 0. 8 7 0. 7 1 0. 6 2 0 . 6 2 8 . 0 0 0 . 0 7 6. 3 9 3. 9 7 12 4.425.636.47708.80708.400.01547860.450 Q2 78 9 2 0 0 . 9 5 1. 8 3 0. 7 1 0. 6 8 1 . 3 0 1 1 . 3 0 0 . 0 5 5. 8 2 7. 5 5 15 7.916.456.89707.90707.600.01507890.358 TO F E S 79 1 16 8 0 . 0 0 1. 8 3 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 1 . 3 0 1 1 . 3 5 0 . 3 5 5. 8 2 7. 5 4 15 8.556.977.98669.95697.000.01757911.012 \\ h r g y v n a s \ D a t a \ 8 8 1 3 0 1 3 5 \ D e s i g n \ C a l c \ S t o r m \ 0 3 0 2 6 9 . 0 4 - P H A S E 2 - S T O R M - R U N - B A S I N Q . x l s Page 1 Reference: PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION: Phase II Supplemental Stormwater Management Report Basin Drainage Area (acres)CN Tc (hrs) Required Volume (ac-ft) Filled Depression Volume (ac-ft) Total Required Volume (ac-ft) Provided Volume (ac-ft) 234.82740.5511.753.4815.2312.50 3A20.49740.287.811.299.107.97 3B30.18730.566.770.136.907.04 3C1.00630.170.070.000.070.25 447.43740.8713.030.0013.0316.68 Totals =133.9239.424.9044.3244.44 Total Drainage Area (acres) *Allowable 2-yr Release Rate (cfs) **Required 2-yr Release Rate (cfs) ***Final 2-yr Release Rate (cfs) *Allowable 25-yr Release Rate (cfs) **Required 25-yr Release Rate (cfs) ***Final 25-yr Release Rate (cfs) *Allowable 100-yr Release Rate (cfs) **Required 100-yr Release Rate (cfs) ***Final 100-yr Release Rate (cfs) 133.925.363.552.5310.719.495.5413.3913.137.3 * Allowable Release Rate based on Ordinance prescribed rates ** Required Release Rate is discharge calculated for "Required Volume" XP-SWMM model *** Final Release Rate is discharge calculated for "Proposed Conditions" XP-SWMM model utilizing depressional storage 24-Hour Storm Detention Summary (Phase II) J.U.L.I.E. JOINT UTILITY LOCATION INFORMATION FOR EXCAVATION 1-800-892-0123 PLANS PREPARED FOR: DATE NOTE: THIS SIGNATURE & SEAL ONLY APPLIES TO DESIGN INFORMATION PREPARED BY SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR INDEX OF SHEETS, SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR LIST OF HIGHWAY STANDARDS, SEE SHEET NO. 2 ENGINEERING PLANS FOR AMENT RD. A S H L E Y R D . M I N K L E R HI L L T O P R D . B L O C K R D . 126 126 71 71 NET LENGTH OF IMPROVEMENT = 3000 FT. 126 47 PENMAN ROADPRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD 3 T . 3 6 N . R . 7 E . T . 3 6 N . R . 7 E . LOCATION MAP (NOT TO SCALE) PROJECT LOCATION MR. DAVID KNOTT PHONE: (708) 606-7220 YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC 9009 ROUTE 126, UNIT B YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60491 PHONE: (630) 882-8800 FAX: (630) 882-8807 PROJECT CONTACT: ANDREW SVIHRA, P.E., PRINCIPAL (630) 553-7560 BENCHMARKS: ENGINEERING CONTACTS: 1 COVER SHEET BM1: PK NAIL IN CENTER LINE OF RTE 126, WEST OF INTERSECTION OF ASHLEY ROAD AND RTE 126.. ELEV. = 717.62 (NAVD 88) BM2: PK NAIL IN CENTER LINE OF RTE 126, SOUTH EASTERLY OF INTERSECTION OF RTE 126 AND WEST LINE OF PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE SUBDIVISION. ELEV. = 739.75 (NAVD 88) LOCAL BENCHMARK: YORKVILLE, 1.5 MILES SE OF, ALONG IL ROUTE 126, 370’ EAST OF THE IL ROUTE 71 AND IL ROUTE 126 INTERSECTION, 36’ NORTH OF AND NORMAL TO CENTER OF IL ROUTE 126, 8’ WEST OF TELEPHONE POLE IN CONCRETE POST STANDARD TABLET STAMPED "TT 14 GT 1952" ELEV. = 727.65 KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS NE 1/4 OF SEC. 10, TWP. 36N. R. 7E., KENDALL TOWNSHIP KENDALL TOWNSHIP, SECTION 10, T. 36 N. - R. 7 E. MATTHEW SVIHRA, E.I., CIVIL ENGINEER II (630) 553-7560 ILLINOIS REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER NO. 062-028196 MY LICENSE EXPIRES ON 11-30-2009 Illinois Professional Design Firm # 184-000108 SEC GROUP, INC. www.secgroupinc.com engineering@secgroupinc.com 651 Prairie Pointe Drive, Yorkville, IL 60560 t. 630.553.7560 f. 630.553.7646 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ c o v 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 0 9 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 INDEX OF SHEETS LIST OF STANDARDS _ _ _ _ _ _ ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PENMAN ROAD ASHLEY ROAD ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PENMAN ROAD ASHLEY ROAD 1 2 3 4 5 7 10 11 12 15 16 18 22 38 39 INDEX OF SHEETS AND LIST OF STANDARDS - - - - - - - 6 9 14 17 21 37 42 2 COVER SHEET INDEX OF SHEETS / LIST OF STANDARDS SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES GENERAL NOTES TYPICAL SECTIONS PLAN & PROFILES PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS INTERSECTION PAVEMENT ELEVATION PLAN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PLANS CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CROSS SECTIONS 280001-04 406201-01 482001-02 482011-03 542306-01 542311 542401 601001-02 601101 701001-01 701006-02 701011-01 701201-02 701301-02 701306-01 701311-02 701326-02 701901 720001 720006-01 720011 728001 780001-01 781001-02 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SYSTEMS MAILBOX TURNOUT HMA SHOULDER ADJACENT TO FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT HMA SHOULDER STRIPS/SHOULDERS WITH RESURFACING OR WIDENING AND RESURFACING PROJECTS PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE ELLIPTICAL FLARED END SECTION GRATING FOR CONCRETE FLARED END SECTION METAL END SECTION FOR PIPE CULVERTS SUB-SURFACE DRAINS CONCRETE HEADWALL FOR PIPE DRAIN OFF-ROAD OPERATIONS, 2L, 2W, 4.5m (15’) MIN. AWAY FOR SPEEDS > 45 MPH OFF-ROAD OPERATIONS, 2L, 2W, 4.5m (15’) TO 600mm (24") FROM PAVEMENT EDGE FOR SPEED > 45 MPH OFF-ROAD MOVING OPERATIONS, 2L, 2W, DAY ONLY FOR SPEEDS > 45 MPH LANE CLOSURE, 2L, 2W, DAY ONLY ON-ROAD TO 600mm (24") OFF-ROAD FOR SPEEDS > 45 MPH LANE CLOSURE, 2L, 2W, SHORT TIME OPERATIONS LANE CLOSURE, 2L, 2W, SLOW MOVING OPERATIONS - DAY ONLY FOR SPEEDS > 45 MPH LANE CLOSURE, 2L, 2W, MOVING OPERATIONS - DAY ONLY LANE CLOSURE, 2L, 2W, PAVEMENT WIDENING FOR SPEEDS > 45 MPH TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SIGN PANEL MOUNTING DETAILS SIGN PANEL ERECTION DETAILS METAL POSTS FOR SIGNS, MARKERS & DELINEATORS TELESCOPING STEEL SIGN SUPPORT TYPICAL PAVEMENT MARKING TYPICAL APPLICATIONS RAISED REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ i n d 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 1 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 CODE NUMBER PAY ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES CODE NUMBER PAY ITEM UNIT QUANTITY 3 CU YD CU YD SQ YD ACRE POUND POUND POUND SQ YD POUND EACH FOOT EACH SQ YD TON SQ YD GALLON TON TON TON TON SQ YD SQ YD SQ YD SQ YD FOOT TON SQ YD EACH FOOT EACH FOOT FOOT EACH CY FOOT FOOT FOOT SQ FT L SUM L SUM L SUM CAL DA FOOT SQ FT SQ FT EACH EACH FOOT 20200100 20800150 21101615 25000210 25000400 25000500 25000600 25100630 28000250 28000300 28000400 28000500 28100707 28200200 31100100 35501326 40300100 40600300 40600625 40603335 40800050 44000100 44000155 44000158 4400020 44300200 48101200 48203029 50105200 54010502 54213669 542A0229 54201480 54215550 60600095 60603800 60608600 60610400 60618300 70100450 70100460 70100500 70103815 70300100 70301000 72000100 72400100 72400500 EARTH EXCAVATION TRENCH BACKFILL TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE, 4" SEEDING, CLASS 2A NITROGEN FERTILIZER NUTRIENT PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZER NUTRIENT POTASSIUM FERTILIZER NUTRIENT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS PERIMETER EROSION BARRIER INLET AND PIPE PROTECTION STONE DUMPED RIPRAP, CLASS A4 FILTER FABRIC SUB-BASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE A HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, 10.5 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (PRIME COAT) AGGREGATE (PRIME COAT) LEVELING BINDER (MACHINE METHOD) HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX "D", N50 INCIDENTAL HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACING PAVEMENT REMOVAL HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL, 1 1/2" HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL, 2 1/4" DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT REMOVAL STRIP REFLECTIVE CRACK CONTROL TREATMENT AGGREGATE SHOULDERS, TYPE B HOT-MIX ASPHALT SHOULDERS 8" REMOVE EXISTING CULVERTS PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT 5’ X 2’ PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FLARED END SECTIONS 24" PIPE CULVERTS, CLASS A, TYPE 1 24" PIPE CULVERTS, TYPE 2, CORRUGATED STEEL OR ALUMINUM CULVERT PIPE 15" METAL END SECTIONS 15" CLASS SI CONCRETE (OUTLET) COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.12 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE M-6.06 COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE M-6.24 CONCRETE MEDIAN SURFACE, 4" TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION, STANDARD 701201 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION, STANDARD 701306 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND PROTECTION, STANDARD 701326 TRAFFIC CONTROL SURVEILLANCE SHORT-TERM PAVEMENT MARKING WORK ZONE PAVEMENT MARKING REMOVAL SIGN PANEL, TYPE 1 REMOVE SIGN PANEL ASSEMBLY - TYPE A RELOCATE SIGN PANEL ASSEMBLY - TYPE A 6,250 16 9,260 3 270 270 270 14,520 600 9 7739 2 16 54 4,118 3,558 4,635 32 811 1,378 3 851 1,916 8,812 157 5,250 4,116 2,702 2 27 2 102 84 4 3 51.0 23.0 39.0 177 1 1 1 5 404 135 13 2 3 72800100 72900100 78000100 78000200 78000500 78000600 78000650 78100100 Z0004500 TELESCOPING STEEL SIGN SUPPORT METAL POST - TYPE A THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINE - LETTERS AND SYMBOLS THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINE - 4" THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINE - 8" THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINE - 12" THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING LINE - 24" RAISED REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKER BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 8" FOOT FOOT SQ FT FOOT FOOT FOOT FOOT EACH SQ YD 15 28.5 281 22,439 1,632 631 68 181 319 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ s u m 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 2 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 LEVELING BINDER (MACHINE METHOD), SUPERPAVE, N50 ITEM AC TYPE VOIDS RAP % PG 64-22 PG 64-22 4% @ 50 GYR.15 N/A GENERAL NOTES GRANULAR MATERIALS BITUMINOUS MAT PRIME COAT AGGREGATE PRIME COAT SHORT TERM PAVEMENT MARKING FT / 100 FT / APPLICATION TONS / CU YD TONS / SQ YD LBS / SQ YD / IN 2.05 0.002 0.375 0.08 112 10 GAL / SQ YD (ON BITUMINOUS) GAL / SQ YD (ON AGGREGATE) HMA CONCRETE 21. WHEN A PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FLARED END SECTION IS USED AT THE END OF A PIPE CULVERT, THE LENGTH OF THE STORM SEWER PIPE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE LENGTH OF THE END SECTIONS. THE SLOPE OF THE PIPE IS CALCULATED BY INCLUDING THE LENGTH OF THE END SECTIONS. 22. FRAME ELEVATIONS GIVEN ON THE PLANS ARE ONLY TO ASSIST THE CONTRACTOR IN DETERMINING THE APPROXIMATE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE. FRAMES ON ADJUSTED STRUCTURES WILL BE ADJUSTED TO THE FINAL ELEVATION OF THE AREA IN WHICH THEY ARE LOCATED AS PART OF THE STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENT COST. 23. ALL WORK PERFORMED RELATIVE TO THIS IMPROVEMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF O.S.H.A. 24. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE 4" OF TOPSOIL ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS, RAKED SMOOTH IN PREPARATION FOR LANDSCAPING ACTIVITIES (SEEDING, ETC.), WHICH WILL BE PAID FOR AS TOPSOIL FURNISH AND PLACE 4". 25. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH CLASS 2A SEEDING FOLLOWING PLACEMENT OF THE TOPSOIL, AND PROVIDE FERTILIZER AND AN EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. THIS WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 250 AND 251 OF THE IDOT "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS." 26. THE QUANTITIES GIVEN IN THE ENGINEER’S BID PROPOSAL ARE INTENDED AS A GUIDE FOR THE CONTRACTOR IN DETERMINING THE SCOPE OF THE COMPLETED PROJECT. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE ALL MATERIAL QUANTITIES AND APPRAISE HIMSELF OF ALL SITE CONDITIONS. NO CLAIMS FOR EXTRA WORK WILL BE RECOGNIZED UNLESS ORDERED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. 27. A PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE FOR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DEVELOPER, ENGINEER, COUNTY ENGINEER, IDOT AND CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE CONTRACTOR PROCEEDS WITH CONSTRUCTION, AT A TIME AND PLACE CONVENIENT FOR ALL PARTIES, FOR REVIEW OF THE CONTRACTOR’S CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES, TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR HANDLING SHOP DRAWINGS AND OTHER SUBMITTALS AND TO ESTABLISH A WORKING UNDERSTANDING AMONG THE PARTIES AS TO THE CONTRACT WORK. 28. THE FOLLOWING RATES OF APPLICATION HAVE BEEN USED IN CALCULATING PLAN QUANTITIES: HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, SUPERPAVE, MIX D, N50 25 254% @ 50 GYR. 4% @ 50 GYR. PG 64-22 HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, SUPERPAVE HOT-MIX ASPHALT SHOULDERS PG 58-22 2% @ 50 GYR.25 HOT-MIX ASPHALT MIXTURE REQUIREMENT 1. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT CONSISTS OF SUPPLYING ALL THE NECESSARY LABOR, MATERIAL, AND EQUIPMENT TO SATISFACTORILY CONSTRUCT AND INSTALL ALL IMPROVEMENTS ACCORDING TO THE PLANS DESIGNATED "PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD." 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE RESIDENTS WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. IN ADDITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ACCESS TO ALL ABUTTING PROPERTY AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, EXCEPT FOR PERIODS OF SHORT DURATION AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT RICH BALLERINI FROM THE PERMIT SECTION AT THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT 3 (815-434-8490), THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE (630-553-4350), AND THE KENDALL COUNTY ENGINEER, FRAN KLAAS (630-553-7616) A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITH THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, AND UTLITY COMPANIES. 5. ALL OFFSET DISTANCES GIVEN ON THE PLANS ARE FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE PROPOSED ROAD. ALL OFFSETS FOR THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES LOCATED IN THE CURB AND GUTTER ARE TO THE BACK OF CURB. OFFSETS FOR ALL OTHER STRUCTURES ARE TO THE CENTER OF THE GRATE. 6. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE ON THE U.S.G.S. DATUM. 7. PRIOR TO ANY EMBANKMENT PLACEMENT, ALL VEGETATION AND UNSITABLE MATERIAL (I.E. TOPSOIL) SHOULD BE REMOVED TO THE DEPTH ENCOUNTERED AND REPLACED WITH SUITABLE EMBANKMENT MATERIAL. ANY EMBANKMENT WIDENING ON EXISTING SLOPES SHOULD BE BENCHED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 205 OF THE IDOT "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION." 8. THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE SHALL BE FREE OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95% OF MODIFIED PROCTOR DENSITY (TESTING FOR COMPACTION SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR). 9. THE CONTRACTOR MAY NOT REMOVE ANY EXCESS MATERIAL FROM THE SITE EXCEPT AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER. IF MATERIAL IS TO BE REMOVED, IT SHALL BE REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ARTICLE 202.03. 10. ALL SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE 1:3 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. ALL DITCH AND DRAINAGE GRADES SHALL BE AT LEAST 0.70% MINIMUM SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 11. OPEN-CUT TRENCHES SHALL BE SHEETED AND BRACED AS REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES, AND AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO PROTECT LIFE, PROPERTY, OR THE WORK. 12. WHERE FIRM FOUNDATION IS NOT ENCOUNTERED AT THE GRADE ESTABLISHED DUE TO UNSUITABLE SOIL, ALL SUCH UNSUITALBE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH APPROVED COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIAL, WHICH WILL NOT BE PAID FOR SEPARATELY. 14. CONTRACTORS SHALL AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN AMPLE MEANS AND DEVICES WITH WHICH TO REMOVE AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL WATER ENTERING THE EXCAVATIONS. 15. ALL TRENCH BACKFILL QUANTITIES FOR PIPE CULVERTS HAVE BEEN COMPUTED AND SHALL BE PAID FOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS BUREAU OF CONSTRUCTION TRENCH BACKFILL TABLE BASED ON PIPE SIZE AND INVERT DEPTH FROM SUBGRADE. 16. AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER, AFTER BACKFILLING THE TRENCH, ALL DITCHING, GRADING AND SHAPING NECESSARY TO RESTORE THE ORIGINAL DRAINAGE IN THE AREA OF WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED. TEMPORARY DRAINAGE FACILITIES MEETING THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER SHALL BE PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 17. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY TO PROPERLY CONTROL EROSION ON THE JOB SITE THROUGH THE USE OF SILTATION PONDS, FILTER FABRICS, ETC. ANY SILTATION OF CONDUITS, STRUCTURES, OR DITCHES SHALL BE CLEANED AND MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL THE SEEDING HAS TAKEN HOLD. ALL WASHOUTS, GULLIES, ETC. WILL BE REGRADED AND SEEDED USING TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING BY THE CONTRACTOR. 18. THE CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR EROSION CONTROL SHALL EXIST THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANUP OF PAVED SURFACES DAILY WITHIN AND OUTSIDE OF THE PROJECT LIMITS CAUSED BY THE PROJECT OPERATIONS. 19. EROSION CONTROL STRUCTURES MUST BE INSPECTED WEEKLY AND AFTER EVERY STORM OF ONE HALF INCH OF RAINFALL OR GREATER BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENT NEEDED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE EROSION CONTROL MUST BE MADE IMMEDIATELY AND AT THE CONTRACTOR’S EXPENSE. 20. ALL EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LATEST REVISION OF THE "STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL" AS PUBLISHED BY THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. GENERAL NOTES 37. NO PLANS SHALL BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS SPECIFICALLY MARKED "FOR CONSTRUCTION." AND UNLESS STAMPED AND SIGNED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS AFFECTING THEIR WORK WITH THE ACTUAL CONDITIONS AT THE JOB SITE. IN ADDITION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THE ENGINEER’S LINE AND GRADE STAKES. IF THERE ARE ANY DISCREPENCIES FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, HE MUST IMMEDIATELY REPORT THE SAME TO THE ENGINEER BEFORE DOING ANY WORK, OTHERWISE THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY. IN THE EVENT OF DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS, STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR SPECIAL DETAILS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY PART OF THE WORK AFFECTED BY OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. FAILING TO SECURE SUCH INSTRUCTIONS, THE CONTRANCTOR WILL BE COSIDERED TO HAVE PROCEEDED AT HIS OWN RISK AND EXPENSE. IN THE EVENT OF ANY DOUBT OR QUESTION ARISING WITH RESPECT TO THE TRUE MEANING OF THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS, THE DECISION OF THE ENGINEER SHALL BE FINAL AND CONCLUSIVE. 38. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VISITING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE IN ORDER TO BETTER CARRY OUT THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSIGNED BY THE DEVELOPER AND UNDERTAKEN BY THE ENGINEER. THE ENGINEER SHALL NOT, DURING SUCH VISITS OR AS A RESULT OF SUCH OBSERVATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR’S WORK IN PROGRESS, SUPERVISE, DIRECT, HAVE CONTROL OVER THE CONTRACTOR’S WORK, NOR SHALL THE ENGINEER HAVE THE AUTHORITY OVER THE RESPONSIBLITY FOR THE MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, OR PROCEDURES OF CONSTRUCTION SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK OF THE CONTRACTOR, OR FOR ANY FAILURE OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH LAWS, RULES, REGULATIONS, ORDINANCES, CODES OR ORDERS APPLICABLE TO THE CONTRACTOR FURNISHING AND PERFORMING HIS WORK. ACCORDINGLY, THE ENGINEER CAN NEITHER GUARANTEE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS BY THE CONTRACTOR NOR ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO FURNISH AND PERFORM HIS WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 39. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE AND MAINTAIN SUCH INSURANCE FROM AN INSURANCE COMPANY AUTHORIZED TO WRITE CASUALTY INSURANCE IN THE STATE OF ILLINOIS AS WILL PROTECT HIMSELF, YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC., IDOT, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., KENDALL COUNTY AND HIS SUBCONTRACTORS AND HIS EMPLOYEES FROM CLAIMS FOR BODILY INJURY, DEATH, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE WHICH MAY ARISE FROM DEVELOPING THE PROPERTY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT COMMENCE WORK UNTIL HE HAS OBTAINED ALL INSURANCE REQUIRED UNDER THIS PARAGRAPH AND FILED THE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE OR THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE INSURANCE POLICY WITH YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC, IDOT, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. AND KENDALL COUNTY. EACH INSURANCE POLICY SHALL CONTAIN A CLAUSE PROVIDING THAT IT SHALL NOT BE CANCELED BY THE INSURANCE COMPANY WITHOUT THIRTY (30) DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO KENDALL COUNTY, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., IDOT AND YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC. OF INTENTION TO CANCEL. THE AMOUNT OF SUCH INSURANCE SHALL BE AS REQUIRED BY THE IDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 107.27. 40. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC, SMITH ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., AND KENDALL COUNTY AND IT’S EMPLOYEES FROM AND AGAINST ALL LOSSES AND ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, PAYMENTS, SUITS, ACTIONS, RECOVERIES AND JUDGEMENTS OF EVERY NATURE AND DESCRIPTION BROUGHT OR RECOVERED AGAINST HIM BY REASON OF ANY OMISSION OR ACT OF THE CONTRACTOR, HIS AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, IN THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK OR IN THE GUARDING OF IT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN IN THE NAME OF YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND SHALL MAINTAIN AND PAY THE PREMIUMS FOR SUCH INSURANCE IN SUCH AMOUNT AND WITH SUCH PROVISIONS AS WILL PROTECT THE COUNTY FROM CONTINGENT LIABILITY AND COPY OF SUCH INSURANCE POLICY OR POLICIES SHALL BE DELIVERED TO YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC. FULL COMPLIANCE BY YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC.WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF SUCH INSURANCE POLICY OR POLICIES SHALL BE A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO YORKVILLE FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC. RIGHT TO ENFORCE AGAINST THE CONTRACTOR ANY PROVISIONS OF THIS TITLE. 41. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE BUREAU OF OPERATIONS, BOB ETZENBACH, (PHONE:815-434-8511, FAX:815-434-6998), WITH A CONTACT PERSON THAT IS AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK, TO CORRECT ANY TRAFFIC CONTROL DEFICIENCIES. 4 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ g e n 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 4 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 ~ ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 P.G.L. EXISTING ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 TYPICAL SECTION ~ ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PROPOSED ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 TYPICAL SECTION 40’ & VARIES 40’ & VARIES LANELANE 12’ EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) 40’ & VARIES 40’ & VARIES 18’ & VARIES 12’12’ LANE LANE 5"+- EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) 12’ 4%* 4:1 4: 1 TURN LANE VARIES 0’-12’ TURN LANE VARIES 0’-12’ VAR. 1’-18’ 20’ MIN. STA. 101+47 TO STA. 117+54 3:1 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SHOULDERS, 8" (TYP.) AGG. SHOULDERS, TYPE A, 6" (TYP.) SAWCUT TO PROVIDE SMOOTH EDGE (TYP.) SUBBASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE A, 16" (TYP.) E X R O W E X R O W P R R O W E X R O W 2’ TYPICAL SECTIONS PENMAN ROAD & ASHLEY ROAD E X R O W * ALGEBRAIC DIFFERENCE IN SLOPE BETWEEN THE DRIVING LANE AND THE PAVED SHOULDER NOT TO EXCEED 8%. SLOPE OF THE PAVED SHOULDER TO BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. **SLOPE OF THE PAVED SHOULDER SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE SUPERELEVATION RATE, BUT NOT LESS THAN 4%. ***SLOPE OF THE AGGREGATE SHOULDER SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE SUPERELEVATION RATE, BUT NOT LESS THAN 6%. P.C.C. BASE COURSE (VARIES 4"-12") VAR. 1’-6’ HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE OVERLAY, HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE WIDENING (VARIES) +-4" HOT-MIX ASPHALT BINDER COURSE, HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL, 2 1/2" 1 1/2" HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, N50 HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, 10 1/2" (TYP.) STA. 106+20.70 TO STA. 142+42.00 STA. 106+20.70 TO STA. 122+03.00 AND STA. 128+46.00 TO STA. 142+42.00 5’4’ VAR.VAR.VAR.VAR. 4’5’ ~ ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PROPOSED ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 TYPICAL SECTION 40’ & VARIES 40’ & VARIES LANE LANE EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) E X R O W E X R O W STA. 122+03.00 TO STA. 128+46.00 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE REMOVAL, 1 1/2" 1 1/2" HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, N50 13’ & VARIES 13’ & VARIES EXISTING AGGREGATE SHOULDER (TYP) 5’3’ 1" LEVELING BINDER (MACHINE METHOD), N50 6" 6%*** 6%4%* 3’5’ 5’3’ 6%***4%* HOT-MIX ASPHALT SHOULDERS, 8" (TYP.) AGG. SHOULDERS, TYPE A, 6" (TYP.) 5’3’ 4%*6%*** MIN. 1.5% & VARIES MIN. 1.5% & VARIES % VARIES % VARIES 5 VARIES 24’-48’ % VARIES % VARIES (TYP.) S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ t y p 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 6 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 P.G.L. LANE LANELANE ~ PENMAN ROAD EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) P.G.L. LANE LANELANE 4:1 ~ ASHLEY ROAD SUBBASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE A, 4" EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) 4:1 12’12’12’ 40’ & VARIES40’ & VARIES 12’12’3’VARIES 0’-12’ AGG SHOULDERS, TYPE A, 6" (TYP.) 40’40’ 2%2% 2%2% 4%4% SUBBASE GRANULAR MATERIAL, TYPE A, 4" COMBINATION CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, TYPE B-6.12 (TYP.) P R R O W P R R O W P R R O W P R R O W2:1 2’ 6" P.G.L. LANE ~ ASHLEY ROAD EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) EXISTING GROUND (TYP.) 40’40’ P R R O W P R R O W EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION PENMAN ROAD STA. 1104+30.00 TO STA. 1105+62.12 TYPICAL SECTIONS PENMAN ROAD & ASHLEY ROAD - - VARIES VARIES 21’ 10’11’ P.C.C. BASE COURSE (VARIES 4"-12") HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, 10 1/2" 1 1/2" HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, N50 HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, +4" HOT-MIX ASPHALT BINDER COURSE, +5" 1 1/2" HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX D, N50 HOT-MIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE, 10 1/2" ASHLEY ROAD STA. 202+85.00 TO STA. 206+60.37 ASHLEY ROAD STA. 202+85.00 TO STA. 206+60.37 4:14:1 3’3’ 6 1" LEVELING BINDER (MACHINE METHOD), N50 1" LEVELING BINDER (MACHINE METHOD), N50 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ t y p 0 2 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 8 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 1003CURVE IL126-2 DELTA =32%%d 13’ 29.68" (LT) PI STA. =122+72.08 R =1,760.00 T =508.41 L =989.88 E =71.96 PC STA. = 117+63.67 PT STA. = 127+53.54 T =381.75 CURVE IL126-1 PI STA. =103+81.75 DELTA =5%%d 59’ 13.43" (RT) R =7,300.00 L =762.81 E =9.97 PC STA. = 100+00.00 PT STA. = 107+62.81 CURVE IL126-1 CURVE IL126-2 89^51’20.5" 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 0 6 + 2 0 . 7 0 240’ STORAGE1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ R= 60’-200’ 5’ OFFSET R=200’ R=2’ 6 ’ PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER P C S T A . 1 1 7 + 6 3 . 6 7 P T S T A . 1 0 7 + 6 2 . 8 1 F E + 1 1 ~ PENMAN ROAD IL ROUTE 126 PROPOSED ROADWAY BY OTHERS COMB. CONC. CURB & GUTTER, TYPE B6.12 12’ 740 710 720 730 705 715 725 735 ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 ~ PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 25’ 12’12’12’ BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1104+30.00 PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER + 2 3 + 6 3 + 0 3 + 0 3 240’ TAPER PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER 240’ STORAGE300’ TAPER 300’ TAPER (50:1) OUTLOT OWNED (BY OTHERS) P R O P E R T Y LI N E 700 700 740 710 720 730 705 715 725 735 PENMAN ROAD PROPOSED CULVERT PIPE, 15 " W/ 2 FLARED END SECTIONS R= 60’-200’ 5’ OFFSET PROPOSED 4’ BIT SHOULDER + 0 0 9 SY RIPRAP 7 SY RIPRAP ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PLAN AND PROFILE 300’ TAPER ( 5 0 : 1 ) 118+25.0 40.00’ RT 118+25.0 60.00’ RT 6 0 ’ EX ROW PR ROW EX ROW PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW + 6 0 + 6 0 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ + 6 0 + 6 0 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 114+14.78 84.75’ RT 114+74.18 60.00’ RT STA. 114+22.70, 50’ RT PRC FES 24" INV. = 713.30 112+75.46 60.0’ RT 113+34.80 84.75’ RT STA. 113+18.99, 50’ RT PRC FES 24" INV. = 713.60 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ M A T C H L I N E S T A 1 2 2 + 0 3 . 0 0 PROPOSED PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT 5’ X 2’ RELOCATE SIGN AND SUPPORT REMOVE "NO PASSING ZONE" SIGN 115 LIN FT PIPE CULVERT CL-A1 24" @ 0.30% PROPOSED 4’ BIT SHOULDER PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER 7 NOTE: FROM STA 122+03 TO 128+46 THERE WILL BE 1 1/2" MILLING AND 1 1/2" OVERLAY ON MAINLINE. NO WIDENING IS PROPOSED. 105+00 110+00 115+00 120+00 1 1 0 0 + 0 0 1 1 0 5 + 0 0 12121212 1212 12" CMP 12" CM P R3 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p p 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 1 9 A M I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 0 6 + 2 0 . 6 5 > PENMAN ROAD PROPOSED/EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE 2.88 % 718.22 0.125% 714.57 714.35 0.300% 713.70 714.30 P I S T A . 1 1 0 + 0 0 E L E V . 7 1 6 . 4 4 P I S T A . 1 1 3 + 0 0 E L E V . 7 1 3 . 6 6 P I S T A . 1 1 3 + 7 5 E L E V . 7 1 3 . 4 4 P I S T A . 1 1 4 + 2 5 E L E V . 7 1 3 . 2 9 712.10 P I S T A . 1 0 8 + 2 5 E L E V . 7 2 1 . 0 0 PROPOSED BOX CULVERT P I S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 E L E V . 7 1 4 . 8 2 +3.48% +0.30% 713.08 715.87 ELEV. = 712.10 PROPOSED LEFT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED RIGHT DITCH PROFILE 725.00 -3.2 0 % -2.61 % -0.92% -0.30% 7 8 9 110+00 1 2 3 4 115+00 6 7 8 9 120+00 1 2 7 2 9 . 7 3 7 2 7 . 9 2 7 2 6 . 1 9 7 2 4 . 5 2 7 2 3 . 0 3 7 2 1 . 7 0 7 2 0 . 5 5 7 1 9 . 6 3 7 1 8 . 8 9 7 1 8 . 3 6 7 1 8 . 0 3 7 1 7 . 8 2 7 1 7 . 6 7 7 1 7 . 5 7 7 1 7 . 4 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 1 9 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 6 . 9 3 7 1 6 . 8 2 7 1 6 . 7 0 7 1 6 . 6 1 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 7 2 9 . 7 3 7 2 7 . 9 2 7 2 6 . 1 9 7 2 4 . 5 2 7 2 3 . 0 3 7 2 1 . 7 0 7 2 0 . 5 5 7 1 9 . 6 3 7 1 8 . 8 9 7 1 8 . 3 6 7 1 8 . 0 3 7 1 7 . 8 2 7 1 7 . 6 7 7 1 7 . 5 7 7 1 7 . 4 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 1 9 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 6 . 9 3 7 1 6 . 8 2 7 1 6 . 7 0 7 1 6 . 6 1 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p p 0 2 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 2 4 A M I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 8 9 120+00 1 2 3 4 125+00 6 7 8 9 130+00 1 2 3 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 7 1 7 . 9 3 7 1 8 . 1 1 7 1 8 . 2 4 7 1 8 . 3 3 7 1 8 . 3 7 7 1 8 . 2 8 7 1 8 . 0 9 7 1 7 . 9 2 7 1 7 . 7 8 7 1 7 . 6 5 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 0.300% 713.70 714.30 713.89 715.85 712.10 713.30 714.13 PROPOSED BOX CULVERT P I S T A . 1 2 9 + 5 0 E L E V . 7 1 5 . 0 4 +2.30% +0.25% P I S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 E L E V . 7 1 4 . 8 2 +3.48% +0.30% 713.08 715.87 PROPOSED LEFT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED RIGHT DITCH PROFILE 7 1 7 . 9 3 7 1 8 . 1 1 7 1 8 . 2 4 7 1 8 . 3 3 7 1 8 . 3 7 7 1 8 . 2 8 7 1 8 . 0 9 7 1 7 . 9 2 7 1 7 . 7 8 7 1 7 . 6 5 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 125+00 12 12 12" CMP 8 9 120+00 1 2 3 4 125+00 6 7 8 9 130+00 1 2 3 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 7 1 7 . 9 3 7 1 8 . 1 1 7 1 8 . 2 4 7 1 8 . 3 3 7 1 8 . 3 7 7 1 8 . 2 8 7 1 8 . 0 9 7 1 7 . 9 2 7 1 7 . 7 8 7 1 7 . 6 5 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 7 1 6 . 7 3 7 1 6 . 8 4 7 1 6 . 9 7 7 1 6 . 9 8 7 1 7 . 0 5 7 1 7 . 1 7 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 4 0 7 1 7 . 5 3 7 1 7 . 6 9 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 7 1 7 . 9 3 7 1 8 . 1 1 7 1 8 . 2 4 7 1 8 . 3 3 7 1 8 . 3 7 7 1 8 . 2 8 7 1 8 . 0 9 7 1 7 . 9 2 7 1 7 . 7 8 7 1 7 . 6 5 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PLAN AND PROFILE 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 CURVE IL126-2 DELTA =32%%d 13’ 29.68" (LT) PI STA. =122+72.08 R =1,760.00 T =508.41 L =989.88 E =71.96 PC STA. = 117+63.67 PT STA. = 127+53.54 EX ROW 3 6 0 ’ EXISTING BOX CULVERT NOTE: FROM STA 122+03 TO 128+46 THERE WILL BE 1 1/2" MILLING AND 1 1/2" OVERLAY ON MAINLINE. NO WIDENING IS PROPOSED. EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING AGG SHOULDER PR ROW EX ROW CURVE IL126-2 MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 2 + 0 3 . 0 0 M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 740 735 730 725 720 715 710 700 705 700 705 710 715 720 725 730 735 740 FE +83 OUTLOT OWNED (BY OTHERS)‘ M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 2 + 0 3 . 0 0 M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 PROPOSED/EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE 122+98.95 60.00’ RT PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER 8 130+00 135+00 140+00 2 0 5 + 0 0 1515 15" CMP 8 9 130+00 1 2 3 4 135+00 6 7 8 9 140+00 1 2 3 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 7 1 8 . 1 6 7 1 8 . 6 2 7 1 9 . 2 8 7 1 9 . 9 6 7 2 0 . 7 9 7 2 1 . 7 1 7 2 2 . 8 1 7 2 3 . 9 7 7 2 5 . 1 3 7 2 5 . 8 7 7 2 6 . 4 9 7 2 6 . 8 6 7 2 6 . 9 9 7 2 6 . 8 9 7 2 6 . 4 9 7 2 5 . 9 4 7 2 5 . 3 2 7 2 4 . 6 6 7 2 3 . 9 9 7 2 3 . 3 5 7 2 2 . 7 4 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 4 2 + 4 2 . 0 0 7 1 7 . 2 3 7 1 7 . 2 2 7 1 7 . 2 6 7 1 7 . 3 1 7 1 7 . 3 3 7 1 7 . 3 9 7 1 7 . 4 1 7 1 7 . 4 7 7 1 7 . 6 1 7 1 7 . 8 5 7 1 8 . 1 6 7 1 8 . 6 2 7 1 9 . 2 8 7 1 9 . 9 6 7 2 0 . 7 9 7 2 1 . 7 1 7 2 2 . 8 1 7 2 3 . 9 7 7 2 5 . 1 3 7 2 5 . 8 7 7 2 6 . 4 9 7 2 6 . 8 6 7 2 6 . 9 9 7 2 6 . 8 9 7 2 6 . 4 9 7 2 5 . 9 4 7 2 5 . 3 2 7 2 4 . 6 6 7 2 3 . 9 9 PROPOSED/EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE > ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.97 713.89 715.85 713.30 714.13 P I S T A . 1 2 9 + 5 0 E L E V . 7 1 5 . 0 4 +2.30% +0.25% PROPOSED LEFT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED RIGHT DITCH PROFILE P I S T A . 1 3 7 + 5 0 E L E V . 7 2 3 . 2 9 +2.50% +1.20% 720.79 P I S T A . 1 3 9 + 0 0 E L E V . 7 2 5 . 0 9 +0.30% 725.32 P I S T A . 1 4 1 + 7 1 E L E V . 7 2 3 . 4 3 -0.80% -1.40% 724.59 722.10-0.92%723.50 721.20 +1.90% 720.10 P I S T A . 1 3 8 + 0 0 E L E V . 7 2 3 . 4 0 +0.30% 724.00 PROPOSED LEFT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED RIGHT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED LEFT DITCH PROFILE PROPOSED RIGHT DITCH PROFILE 7 1 7 . 5 0 7 1 7 . 3 4 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p p 0 3 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 2 8 A M I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 4 2 + 4 2 . 0 0 240’ STORAGE 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 12’ 6 ’ R=200’ R=2’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 3’ BIT SHOULDER 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.96 ~ ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 MATCHL I N E S T A . 2 0 5 + 2 5 IL ROUTE 126 PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER PROPOSED 5’ AGG SHOULDER EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING AGG SHOULDER 240’ STORAGE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT EXISTING AGG SHOULDER 720 730 700 710 725 735 705 695 715 710 720 730 700 725 735 705 695 715 R= 55’-200’ 10’ OFFSET R= 75’-320’ 15’ OFFSET 300’ TAPER 50:1 TAPER (300’) PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 4’ BIT SHOULDER RELOCATE SIGN & SUPPORT 50:1 TAPER (300’) 50:1 TAPER (300’)50:1 TAPER (300’) + 4 6 + 4 6 + 6 2 + 0 2 + 4 2 + 6 7 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 75^29’41.46" 1 2 ’ PROPOSED CULVERT PIPE, 15 " W/ 2 FLARED END SECTIONS 25’ 25’ + 8 6 PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 4’ BIT SHOULDER ~ ASHLEY ROAD 240’ TAPER PE +03 FE +22 PE +24 FE +10 SEE DETAIL "A" DETAIL "A" 4 ’ 4’ 8 ’ R=2’ (TYP.) R=3’ STA. 134+30.83 18’ RT STA. 134+34.96 26’ RT STA. 134+72.30 18’ RT STA. 134+59.44 26’ RT STA. 206+06 8’ RT STA. 206+01.12 6’ RT R=73’ 2’ STA. 206+15.40 23.28 RT 2 ’ 2.5’ 3.5’ 0.5’ ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PLAN AND PROFILE 133+27.7 60.00’ RT 134+09.5 120.00’ RT 135+27.7 40.00’ RT 135+27.7 40.00’ RT 6 0 ’ EX ROW PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW EX ROW M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 22.6 5 ’ REMOVE STOP SIGN RELOCATE SIGN AND SUPPORT RELOCATE SIGN AND SUPPORT 9 NOTE: FROM STA 122+03 TO 128+46 THERE WILL BE 1 1/2" MILLING AND 1 1/2" OVERLAY ON MAINLINE. NO WIDENING IS PROPOSED. MATCHLINE STA. 116+00 MATCHLINE STA. 112+00 PENMAN ROAD 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 1003 710 700 720 715 695 705 725 730 735 730 710 700 720 715 695 705 725 735 > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 > PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 + 1 4 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 1 0 4 . 3 0 . 0 0 R= 60’-200’ 5’ OFFSET COMB. CONC. CURB & GUTTER, TYPE B6.12 PROPOSED 24" RCP R= 60’-200’ 5’ OFFSET 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION (BY OTHERS) 89^51’20.5" EX RO W EX RO W E X R O W E X R O W P R R O W E X R O W > PENMAN ROAD + 5 8 1 2 ’ + 3 8 + 7 0 PENMAN ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE 240’ T A P E R 132’ TA P E R 144’ STORAGE 113+34.8 84.72’ RT 112+75.5 60.00’ RT P R R O W 114+14.8 84.75’ RT 114+74.2 60.00’ RT 60’ 60’ 10 1 1 5 + 0 0 1100 + 0 0 1105+00 12121212 12 " C M P R3 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p p 0 4 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 3 3 A M I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 7 1 6 . 4 4 7 1 6 . 5 8 7 1 6 . 5 7 7 1 6 . 7 4 7 1 6 . 9 2 7 1 6 . 7 7 7 1 6 . 3 2 7 1 6 . 1 9 7 1 6 . 0 8 7 1 6 . 1 0 7 1 6 . 1 6 7 1 7 . 2 5 21100+00 1 3 4 1105+00 BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1104+30.00 ELEV. = 718.04 PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION (BY OTHERS) EX PENMAN ROAD PR PENMAN ROAD > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 > PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 ELEVATION 717.38 7 2 0 . 8 0 +0.62%-4. 0 0 % VPI STA. 1104+22 ELEV = 717.34 -4. 0 0 % VPI STA. 1104+87 ELEV = 716.04 -2.00% L = 80.00’ VPI STA. 1105+44 ELEV = 717.18 +2.00% +1.09% 7 2 1 . 1 1 7 2 1 . 3 0 7 2 0 . 2 2 7 1 8 . 2 3 7 1 6 . 7 9 7 1 6 . 4 8 7 1 7 . 2 5 ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.96 ~ ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 ASHLEY ROAD MAT C H L I N E S T A . 1 3 6 + 0 0 MAT C H L I N E S T A . 1 3 2 + 0 0 115’ STORAGE + 3 5 + 1 0 ~ ASHLEY ROAD PR ROW 700 710 720 725 705 695 715 730 735 715 700 710 720 725 705 695 730 735 PROPOSED EDGE OF PAVEMENT PROPOSED 3’ AGG SHOULDER 35:1 TAPER (180’) 35:1 TAPER (180’) 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 E N D I M P R O V M E N T S S T A . 2 0 2 + 8 5 . 0 0 75^29’41.46" IL L I N O I S R O U T E 1 2 6 + 2 5 + 9 5 PROPOSED 4’ BIT SHOULDER ASHLEY ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE 4 0 ’ 134+09.5 120.00’ RT 133+27.7 60.00’ RT 134+87.0 100.08’ RT 134+83.1 85.00’ RT 135+27.7 40.00’ RT 60’ 1 0 ’ 1 2 ’ 11 1 3 5 + 0 0 200+00 205+00 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p p 0 5 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 3 6 A M I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 207+44.10 ELEVATION 718.71 PROPOSED CENTERLINE PROFILE EXISTING CENTERLINE PROFILE PROPOSED DITCHLINE RIGHT SIDE VPI STA. 206+30 ELEV = 718.11 +1.88% +2.00% MILL & RESURFACE STA. 205+50.00 ELEV. = 716.60 +1.97% 708.60 715.50 B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 2 0 2 + 8 5 E L E V A T I O N 7 0 9 . 9 2 200+00 201+00 202+00 203+00 204+00 205+00 206+00 7 0 8 . 1 4 7 0 8 . 3 3 7 0 8 . 5 7 7 0 8 . 8 9 7 0 9 . 2 8 7 0 9 . 9 2 7 1 0 . 7 3 7 1 1 . 6 4 7 1 2 . 8 0 7 1 4 . 1 2 7 1 5 . 5 5 7 1 6 . 6 0 7 1 7 . 2 7 7 1 8 . 7 1 7 0 9 . 9 2 7 1 0 . 7 3 7 1 1 . 6 4 7 1 2 . 8 0 7 1 4 . 1 2 7 1 5 . 5 5 7 1 6 . 6 0 7 1 7 . 5 4 7 1 8 . 5 0 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 R=200’ P C S T A . 1 0 7 + 6 2 . 8 1 ~ PENMAN ROAD PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW PR ROW 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 8" SKIP DASH, WHITE 2’ DASH - 6’ SKIP 8" LANE LINE, WHITE TURN ARROW, WHITE 15.6 SQ. FT. (TYP.) 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE TURN ARROW, WHITE 15.6 SQ. FT. (TYP.) 8" SKIP DASH, WHITE 2’ SKIP - 6’ DASH 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 4" DOUBLE YELLOW P T S T A . 1 1 7 + 6 3 . 6 7 ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 ~ PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 8" LANE LINE, WHITE P E N M A N R O A D IL ROUTE 126 R=2’ NOTE: 12" DIAGONALS, YELLOW, 30’ C-C (TYP.) 8" LANE LINE, WHITE 8" SKIP DASH, WHITE 2’ SKIP - 6’ DASH 4" DOUBLE YELLOW R1-1-3030 * + 0 0 + 2 3 + 6 0 + 6 0 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ + 6 3 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE + 6 0 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ 24" STOP BAR, WHITE STA. 1105+10 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ +49.7 12’ 6’ +17.7 12’ 6’ + 0 3 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 12" DIAGONALS, YELLOW, 30’ C-C (TYP.) 12" DIAGONALS, YELLOW, 30’ C-C (TYP.) BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1104+30.00 ONE-WAY AMBER MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP) ONE-WAY CRYSTAL MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP) TWO-WAY AMBER MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP.) + 4 3 . 1 3 B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 0 6 + 2 0 . 7 0 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 2 + 0 0 . 0 0 TWO-WAY AMBER MARKER, 80’ C-C (TYP.) 4" NO PASSING ZONE LINE YELLOW AN EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS REQUIRED LEADING FROM THE BEGINNING OF IMPROVEMENTS (STA. 106+20.70) HEADING WEST AND TYING INTO THE EXISTING "NO PASSING LINE". AN EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS ALSO REQUIRED BETWEEN (STA. 122+00) AND (STA. 128+46). DUE TO TYING INTO A PREVIOUS "NO PASSING ZONE" EXISTING SIGNS WILL BE UTILIZED. 12 PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN IL ROUTE 126 AND PENMAN ROAD 105+00 110+00 115+00 120+00 1 1 0 0 + 0 0 1 1 0 5 + 0 0 12121212 1212 12" CMP 12" CM P R3 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p m 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 0 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 12 ’ 12 ’ ‘4" EDGE LINE, WHITE TWO-WAY AMBER MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP.) TWO-WAY AMBER MARKER, 80’ C-C (TYP.) M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 2 + 0 0 . 0 0 M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 NOTE: AN EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS REQUIRED BETWEEN (STA. 122+00) AND (STA. 128+46). 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 13 125+00 12 1212" C M P S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p m 0 2 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 2 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 4 2 + 4 2 . 0 0 R=200’ ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.96 ~ ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 A S H L E Y R O A D IL ROUTE 126 4’ EDGE LINE, WHITE 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE 8" SKIP DASH, WHITE 2’ DASH - 6’ SKIP 8" LANE LINE, WHITE TURN ARROW, WHITE 15.6 SQ. FT. (TYP.) 12" DIAGONALS, YELLOW, 30’ C-C (TYP.) 8" LANE LINE, WHITE 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 12" DIAGONALS, YELLOW 50’ C-C (TYP.) 8" LANE LINE, WHITE 8" SKIP DASH, WHITE 2’ SKIP - 6’ DASH 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 24" STOP BAR, WHITE 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE R1-1-3030 * + 6 2 + 8 5 R=2’ + 2 8 . 3 6 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ + 4 6 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ + 0 2 + 4 2 4" EDGE LINE, WHITE 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 1 2 ’ 6 ’ 24" STOP BAR, WHITE STA. 206+28.7 +10 +35 12’12’ 6’ 10’12’ 1 2 ’ 8" LANE LINE, WHITE 4" DOUBLE YELLOW 12" DIAGONALS, WHITE 30’ C-C (TYP.) BEGIN IM P R O V M E N T S STA. 202 + 8 5 . 0 0 TWO-WAY AMBER MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP.) ONE-WAY AMBER MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP) ONE-WAY CRYSTAL MARKERS, 40’ C-C (TYP) 12 ’ 12 ’ M A T C H L I N E S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 14 PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN IL ROUTE 126 AND ASHLEY ROAD NOTE: AN EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS REQUIRED BETWEEN (STA. 122+00) AND (STA. 128+46). A WESTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS REQUIRED TO EXTEND 500’ BEYOND THE END OF IMPROVMENTS (STA. 142+42) TO (STA 147+42). AN EASTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE" IS ALSO REQUIRED TO EXTEND AND TIE INTO THE END OF THE EXISTING EASTBOUND "NO PASSING LINE". 130+00 135+00 140+00 2 0 0 + 0 0 2 0 5 + 0 0 1515 15" CMP S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ p m 0 3 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 3 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ i n t 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 4 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 135+00 2 0 5 + 0 0 115+00 PT STA. 1104+20.15 1 1 0 5 + 0 0 R3 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 ~ PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1104+30.00 3 IL ROUTE 126 INTERSECTION PAVEMENT ELEVATION PLAN IL ROUTE 126 3 STA. 1104+35.24, 18.01’ RT ELEV. = 716.72 STA. 114+36.87, 25.14’ RT ELEV. = 716.92 STA. 1104+78.92, 17.99’ RT ELEV. = 716.12 STA. 204+95.44, 18.00’ RT ELEV. = 715.06 STA. 134+96.78, 31.79’ RT ELEV. = 718.11 STA. 205+55.76, 18.0’ RT ELEV. = 716.29 PENMAN ROAD ASHLEY ROAD 2% 2% 716.82716.82 716.90 716.95 717.01 716.68 716.46 716.24 717.03 716.73 716.43 716.13STA. 112+91.78 ELEV. = 717.16 STA. 1104+88.22, 25.15’ RT ELEV. = 716.14 717.49 717.30 2% 1. 0 % 1.5 % 718.80 718.72 717.41 718.34 717.58 716.82 +75 717.65 +50 717.79 +25 717.88 +00 717.97 +00 719.63 +25 719.22 +50 718.80 +75 720.04 +50 720.45 +75 718.44 2 % +25 715.75 +00 715.19 2 %2 % +25 717.06 +50 717.10 +75 717.15 +00 717.19 +25 717.25 +50 717.31 +75 717.37 2 % +00 715.55 +50 716.60 +75 717.07 +00 717.54 +25 718.11 +25 716.80 +00 716.48 +75 716.48 +50 716.79 +50 716.43 717.18 +79 716.03 STA. 133+35.58 ELEV. = 717.23 STA. 135+69.76 ELEV. = 720.82 2% STA. 114+89.84 ELEV. = 716.97 2 % +25 716.11 717.46 717.21 716.96 716.72 716.47 716.22 2% 716.14 716.49 2% 720.02 719.62 720.42+00 719.40 719.10 +50 716.15 715.88 715.54 715.19 +50 717.53 NOTE: ALL RADII GRADES ARE AT 20 FOOT INCREMENTS STARTING AT THE P.C. OF IL ROUTE 126 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. ~ IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.96 ~ ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 STA. 206+06.22, 37.79’ RT ELEV. = 716.82 15 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 0 6 + 2 0 . 6 5 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 2 2 + 0 0 . 0 0 PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW PR ROW P T S T A . 1 1 7 + 6 3 . 6 7 > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 113+74.56 > PENMAN ROAD STA. 1105+62.12 BEGIN IMPROVEMENTS STA. 1104.30.00 P E N M A N R O A D IL ROUTE 126 TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS STA. 111+12.37, 29.55’ LT STA. 116+13.15, 34.58’ LT STA. 109+73.10, 43.09’ RT EROSION CONTROL PLANS INLET AND PIPE PROTECTION STA. 113+19.68, 50.19’ RT STA. 121+28.54, 32.00’ RT 16 105+00 110+00 115+00 120+00 125+00 1 1 0 0 + 0 0 1 1 0 5 + 0 0 105+00 110+00 115+00 120+00 125+0 0 1 1 0 0 + 0 0 1 1 0 5 + 0 0 12121212 1212 12" CMP BOX CULVERT:5’ (W) X 2’ (H)INV: 711.96 12" CM P BOX CULVERT:5’ (W) X 2’ (H)INV: 712.01 R3 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ e r o 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 6 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 B E G I N I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 2 8 + 4 6 . 0 0 E N D I M P R O V E M E N T S S T A . 1 4 2 + 4 2 . 0 0 > IL ROUTE 126 STA. 134+19.96 > ASHLEY ROAD STA. 206+60.37 PR ROW EX ROW EX ROW 50 50 (IN FEET) 0 25 SCALE: 1" = 50’ 100 3 A S H L E Y R O A D IL ROUTE 126 BEGIN IM P R O V M E N T S STA. 202 + 8 5 . 0 0 TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS STA. 128+46.00, 39.08’ LT STA. 130+38.69, 28.85’ LT STA. 137+00.00, 31.50’ LT STA. 142+42.00, 25.29’ LT STA. 128+46.00, 34.57’ RT STA. 142+42.00, 27.19’ RT EROSION CONTROL PLANS 17 130+00 135+00 140+00 2 0 0 + 0 0 2 0 5 + 0 0 130+00 135+00 140+00 2 0 0 + 0 0 2 0 5 + 0 0 1515 BOX CUL V E R T : 3’ (W) X 2 ’ ( H ) INV: 712. 4 0 BOX CULV E R T : 3’ (W) X 2 ’ ( H ) INV: 712. 5 8 15" CMP S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ e r o 0 2 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 7 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 EDGE OF PAVEMENT E E D D C C B B A A FLOW LINE 5.4 m (18’) 1.8 m (6’)1.8 m (6’)1.8 m (6’) NO. 6 TIE BARS @ 24" CENTERS 1.2 m (4’) R 80 ^ S H O U L D E R S L O P E EDGE OF SHOULDER EDGE OF OUTLET TO CONFORM TO THE SLOPE OF SHOULDER WELDED WIRE FABRIC WEIGHING NOT LESS THAN 2.83 kg/sq m (58 LBS./100 SQ. FT.) TO BEGIN HERE F FG G A-A * *DIMENSIONS OF THE CURB & GUTTER AT SECTION A-A ARE SHOWN ON STATE STANDARD 606001-02. FOR DETAILS OF OUTLET FOR CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE B-15.60 (B-6.24) SEE STATE STANDARD 606006. B-B 100 (4) 65 R (2-1/2) 12 5 R (4 - 5 / 8 ) 6 5 ( 2 - 1 / 2 ) 125 (5) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 270 (10-5/8) 340 (13-1/2) C-C 125 R (5)75 R (3) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 95 R (3-3/4)250 R (9-3/8) 1 1 0 ( 4 - 3 / 8 ) 290 (11-1/2) WELDED WIRE FABRIC D-D 75 (3) 1 5 5 ( 6 - 1 / 4 ) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 1 5 0 ( 6 ) 35 (1-3/8) 310 R (12 - 3 / 8 ) 1.2 m (3’ 11-3/8")330 (13-1/8) E-E 30 (1-1/8) 75 R (3) 150 (6) 4 4 5 R (1 7 - 3 / 4 ) 675 (27) 340 (13-1/2) 1.54 m (5’ 1-1/2") 75 R (3) 75 (3) 5 0 ( 2 ) 1 2 5 ( 5 ) 75 R (3) 150 (6)675 (27) 75 (3) 75 R (3) 4 4 5 R (1 7 - 3 / 4 ) 340 (13-1/2)1 2 5 ( 5 ) F-F 150 R (6) 75 (3)150 (6) 4 5 0 ( 1 8 ) G-G GENERAL NOTES ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS (INCHES) UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. GUTTER OUTLET SHALL BE TIED TO THE PAVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAILS FOR LONGITUDINAL CONSTRUCTION JOINT SHOWN ON STATE STANDARD 420001. TIE BARS SHALL BE NO. 20 (NO. 6) AT 600 (24) CENTERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. IF THE AVERAGE GRADE OF PAVEMENT FOR THE DISTANCE FROM SECTION A-A TO D-D EXCEEDS 2% THIS DISTANCE SHALL BE INCREASED 1.8 m (6’) FOR EACH 1% INCREASE IN GRADE. OUTLET FOR CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER BARRIER CURB MOUNTABLE CURB CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL 6" for Type M3.06 12" for Type M3.12 18" for Type M3.18 24" for Type M3.24 when sub-base is omitted Slope same as sub-base or 3/ 4 " p e r f t . 3"3" 3 " T PAVEMENT #4 REBAR (TYP.) R=3" 3 " T Y P . 9 " f o r B 9 . 1 2 , B 9 . 1 8 , B 9 . 2 4 6 " f o r B 6 . 1 2 , B 6 . 1 8 , B 6 . 2 4 12" for Type B6.12 & B9.12 18" for Type B6.18 & B9.18 24" for Type B6.24 & B9.24 1"6" Slope same as sub-base or 3/ 4 " p e r f t . when sub-base is omitted T Slope 6% #4 REBAR (TYP.) R=1" 3 " T Y P . PAVEMENT Tie bars shall be placed on 9’ centers (minimum 2 per joint). steel tie bars 30’ long conforming to AASHTO M-31 of M-53. All construction joints shall be provided with 1/2" dia. deformed cap having a pinched stop that will provide 1" of expansion. Standard Specifications. The dowel bar shall be fitted with a coated smooth dowel bar conforming to Article 1006.11(b) of the All expansion joints shall be provided with a 1 1/4 dia. X 18" 15 feet. be placed between expansion joints at distances not to exceed curves and at construction joints. Contraction joints shall shall be installed at points of curvature for short radius conforming to the cross section of the curb and gutter pavement, a 1" thick preformed expansion joint filler, When curb and gutter is constructed adjacent to flexible P.C.C. pavement or base course. the curb and gutter in prolongation with joints in adjacent Contraction joints and expansion joints shall be installed in Standard Specifications, joints shall be constructed as follows. JOINTS - In addition to the requirements of Article 606.06 of the curb shall be made at the rate of 3" per foot of length or flatter. TRANSITIONS - The transition from full height curb to depressed the continuous portion of concrete gutter in front of the casting. rebars (L = 12" + casting length + 12") shall be incorporated in casing is less than the width of the curb and gutter, 2 - No. 4 each side of the metal casing. When the width of the metal shall be installed in the curb and gutter a distance of 10 ft. from filler, conforming to the cross sections of the curb and gutter, be incorporated in the curb and gutter, a 1" thick preformed joint DRAINAGE OPENINGS - At all locations where metal casings are to of the gutter flag shall be 9". Also, tie bars shall be omitted. is constructed adjacent to flexible pavement, the vertical thickness THICKNESS - T - Thickness of pavement. When curb & gutter 12" 12" 665 (2’ 2-1/8") 3’24’3’ EARTH SHLD.EARTH SHLD. R.O.W. LINE OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS V A R I E S 15’ 1 5 ’ PROPOSED AGGREGATE SHOULDER EDGE OF BITUMINOUS SHOULDER A A BITUMINOUS SHOULDER (SEE CROSS SECTIONS FOR PROFILE) MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION R . O . W . L I N E O R A S S H O W N O N P L A N S EXISTING ENTRANCE ENTRANCE SURFACE MATERIAL: 6" AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE; TYPE B FIELD ENTRANCE DETAIL ENTRANCE SURFACE MATERIAL: 6" AGGREGATE SURFACE COURSE; TYPE B MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS * TIE BAR * TIE BAR * Tie bar not required when adjacent to flexible pavement. 18 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ d e t 0 1 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 4 9 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " 4 " E N D 780-1 TYPICAL APPLICATION @ LEFT TURN LANES 2’ TYP. 8 " WHITE 6’ TYP. 780-5 2’ TYP. WHITE4 " 6’ TYP. 780-6 780-7 10’30’10’ 500’ 8 " CL NO PASSING ZONE LINE 4" 4" 8" 4" 4" 6" 10’30’1"10’ (SEE TYPICAL SECTIONS) 780-8 E.O.P. E.O.P. EDGE LINE - WHITE EDGE LINE - WHITE CENTERLINE & NO PASSING ZONE LINES - YELLOW PAVEMENT MARKING 19 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ d e t 0 2 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 5 1 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 N.T.S. MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS 3" WIDTH H E I G H T EXTENSION COLLAR CLASS SI CONCRETE 6 " 6 " EXIST. HEADWALL EXIST. BOX CULVERT U EXISTING CULVERT SIZE EXTENSION COLLAR HEIGHT IN.IN.IN.IN. REINFORCEMENT BARS CU. YD.POUND EACH ’X’’Y’ U-BAR ’X’ ’ Y ’ WIDTH 12" BELOW EXISTING SHOULDER LINE IF REQUIRED. U-BAR #4 U-BAR #4 U-BAR LOCATION QUANTITIES ARE FOR ONE SIDE ONLY PROP. PRECAST CONC. BOX CULV. EXT. EXPANSION BOLTS SHALL CONSIST OF SELF DRILLING EXPANSION SHIELDS OF 9" INTO NEW CONCRETE. BOLTS SHALL BE DRILLED IN THE CENTER OF THE EXISTING BOX CULVERT BARREL WALLS. MINIMUM CERTIFIED PROOF LOAD = 4,080 LBS. PRECAST CULVERT EXTENSION 540-5 FT. x FT.FT. x FT. REMOVE EXISTING HEADWALL TO A DEPTH |4" COLLAR DETAIL (PRECAST BOX CULVERT EXTENSION OF BOX CULVERT) CONC. COLLAR 3/4 " EXPANSION BOLTS @ 12" CTS. AND 3/4 " DIA. HOOKED BOLTS. HOOKED BOLTS SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM 3/4 " DIA. EXPANSION BOLTS 540-6 PRECAST END SECTION VAR. PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT EXISTING R.C. BOX CULVERT 1’-0" 2 @ #5 BARS (2" CLEARANCE) 1.) 2.) GENERAL NOTES A A PLAN VIEW CONCRETE REMOVAL LIMITS LEGEND 2 @ #5 BARS (2" CLEARANCE) EXISTING R.C. BOX CULVERT SECTION A-A 6" CLASS SI CONCRETE COLLAR TOP OF HEADWALL TO BE REMOVED 4" MIN. BELOW FINISHED GRADE COLLAR DETAIL (PRECAST BOX CULVERT EXTENSION OF BOX CULVERT) CLASS SI CONCRETE SHALL BE USED THROUGHOUT. THE INSIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE CLASS SI CONCRETE COLLAR SHALL BE THE SAME AS THE NEW PRECAST CONCRETE BOX CULVERT. WID. H T . U-BAR ’ Y ’ ’X’ IN.IN. REINFORCEMENT BARS CU. YD.POUND ’X’’Y’ U-BAR LOCATION FT. x FT. EXISTING CULVERT SIZE IN. PRECAST CULV. EXTENSION CONC. COLLAR EACH 3/4 " DIA. EXPANSION BOLTS EXPANSION BOLTS, 3/4 " (SEE GENERAL NOTE #2) EXPANSION BOLTS SHALL CONSIST OF SELF DRILLING EXPANSION SHIELDS AND 3/4 " HOOKED BOLTS. HOOKED BOLTS SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 9" INTO NEW CONCRETE. BOLTS SHALL BE PLACED IN EACH CORNER AND AT 18" MAXIMUM CENTERS. MINIMUM CERTIFIED PROOF LOADING = 4,080 LBS. 20 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ d e t 0 3 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 5 2 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 N.T.S. A A TRAFFIC 10’10’ 1’ 3/4"/FT. EXISTING SHOULDER SECTION A-A MAILBOX TURNOUT DETAILS SHOULDER LINE **** ** 406-1 TRAFFIC LANE EDGE OF PAVEMENT * * MAILBOX 2" BIT. SURF. ** PROP. RESURFACING AGG. BSE. CSE. TY. A AS REQUIRED (6" MIN. OVER EARTH SHLD.) SEE STANDARD 406201 FURNISHED EXCAVATION AS REQUIRED MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS SAW CUT (INCIDENTAL) REMOVE BY UNIFORM CUT (REMOVAL INCIDENTAL TO MILLING OPERATIONS) EXISTING SURFACEDIRECTION OF BIT. SURF. REMOVAL ROUNDED EDGE FROM MILLING OPERATIONS NOTE:WHEN MILLING OPERATIONS PRODUCE A ROUNDED EDGE, THEN A SAW CUT SHALL BE USED TO MANUFACTURE A PERPENDICULAR EDGE AS SHOWN IN THE DETAIL. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE THE SOLE JUDGE CONCERNING THE USE OF THIS DETAIL BITUMINOUS DETAIL AT BUTT JOINTS BIT. SURFACE REMOVAL (COLD MILLING) 406-8 SIDE ROADS ENTRANCES SECTION A-A DETAILS AT ENTRANCES & SIDE ROADS PRIVATE & COMMERCIAL EDGE OF AGG. SHOULDER EDGE OF PAV’T OR BIT. SHOULDER 406-2 10’ A A 1 0 ’ EDGE OF PROPOSED PAVEMENT OR BIT. SHLD. BITUMINOUS SURFACESEE DETAIL A SEE DETAIL A PROP. RESURF. DETAIL A R A D I U S R E T U R N 30’ SEE SCHED./PLAN (DO NOT RESURFACE FIELD ENTRANCES) PLAN AT PRIVATE & COMMERCIAL ENTRANCES EDGE OF BIT. 4’ (TYPICAL ENT.) 20’ (TYPICAL S.R.) 1 1/2 " MATCH EXIST. BIT. FLARE OR USE 1:1 FLARE FOR NEW BIT. OVER EXIST. AGG. THE COST OF REMOVAL AT EXISTING BIT. OR P.C.C. LOCATIONS SHALL BE PAID FOR PER SQ. YD. BY THE APPROPRIATE PAY ITEM. REMOVAL AT EXISTING AGG. LOCATIONS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE BITUMINOUS. A-3 LOCATIONS SHALL BE FEATHER TAPERED. 21 S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . P L A N A L I G N M E N T C H E C K E D R T . O F W A Y C H E C K E D C A D D F I L E N A M E P R O F I L E S U R V E Y E D P L O T T E D G R A D E S C H E C K E D B . M . N O T E D S T R U C T U R E N O T A T ’ N S C H ’ K D B Y D A T E N O T E B O O K N O . SECTION COUNTY STA.TO STA. ILLINOIS FED. AID PROJECTFED. ROAD DIST. NO. TOTAL SHEETS SHEET NO.RTE. F.A.P. KENDALL SCALE: . . . \ c a d \ f i n - d w g \ 2 6 9 _ d e t 0 4 . d g n 8 / 2 6 / 2 0 0 8 C L I E N T : P R O J E C T C O N T A C T : C O M P A N Y N A M E : 1 0 : 1 4 : 5 4 A M DRAWN BY: BAH VERT. N/A HORIZ. DATE: CHECKED BY: AS PRESTWICK OF YORKVILLE ILLINOIS ROUTE 126 AT PENMAN ROAD I l l i n o i s P r o f e s s i o n a l D e s i g n F i r m # 1 8 4 - 0 0 0 1 0 8 S E C G R O U P , I N C . w w w . s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m e n g i n e e r i n g @ s e c g r o u p i n c . c o m 6 5 1 P r a i r i e P o i n t e D r i v e , Y o r k v i l l e , I L 6 0 5 6 0 t . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 5 6 0 f . 6 3 0 . 5 5 3 . 7 6 4 6 42 GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 1 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 1 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 1 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 3 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 1 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 1 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 1 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 1 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 0 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 0 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 0 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 3 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 1 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 0 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 0 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 4 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 0 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 0 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 3 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T BL O C K P A R C E L S E C T I O N 1 0 , KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 5 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T NO R T H H A L F O F T H E N O R T H E A S T QU A R T E R S E C T I O N 1 5 KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 5 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T NO R T H H A L F O F T H E N O R T H E A S T QU A R T E R S E C T I O N 1 5 KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 3 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 1 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T PA R T O F S E C T I O N 1 5 , T W P 3 6 N , R A N G E 7 E , KE N D A L L T W P . , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , I L L I N O I S GR A N T O F E A S E M E N T NO R T H H A L F O F T H E N O R T H E A S T QU A R T E R S E C T I O N 1 5 KE N D A L L T O W N S H I P , K E N D A L L C O U N T Y , IL L I N O I S MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 F O R C O N T I N U A T I O N Petitioner’s Request & Background: In April 2005, the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision (fka Highlands at Ashley Pointe), located in the southwest quadrant of IL Route 126 and Ashley Road, was granted annexation agreement approval via Ord. 2005-30 to construct a total of 345 single-family residential dwelling units on approximately 190 acres of land in two (2) phases to be platted as Unit 1 and Unit 2 within the R-2 One-Family Residence District. While both Units 1 and 2 were given Final Plat approval (Res. 2005-78 and Res. 2006-82, respectively), only Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision was recorded. Currently, four (4) single family homes in Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision have been constructed. Since that time, the subdivision’s original developer lost the property in foreclosure and ownership reverted back to Homestar Bank in 2012. In March of 2013, the Petitioners, John and Michelle Stewart, repurchased the entire property, which originally belonged to their family, for the purpose of revamping the land plan to replace some of the single-family lots in a portion of the development with a new private Christian high school focusing on agriculture and farming technologies. Although the current R-2 One-Family Residence District zoning identifies schools as a permitted use, the existing annexation agreement requires approval by the City Council to be amended in order to change the land use plan as proposed. Proposed Revised Land Use Plan The overall scope of the new land plan rests on t he Petitioners’ request to resubdivide an existing 43.62-acre lot in Unit 1 (Lot 358) of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision, and a portion of Unit 2, to remove 84 lots originally platted for single-family residences to construct a new Christian high school (refer to attached reference plat). The newly resubdivided lot will then consist of approximately 32 acres of land planned for a state-of-the-art 60,000 square foot, three-level private secondary education facility, athletic fields, on-site parking and other accessory structures. Approximately 5.54 acres of land will be utilized for retention area and open space to be conveyed to the future homeowners association (HOA). Finally, the remaining 6.48 acres will be dedicated for public right-of-way as Whitekirk Lane and Mustang Way. The following comparison table details the change in density (dwelling units per acre) within this area of the development based on the existing and proposed plans: 1 As a result of the resubdivision Lot #’s 273-356 from “Prestwick of Yorkville Unit 2” were removed. # of Dwelling Lots (Units) Net Area Residential Density (du/ac.) EXISTING 345 single-family lots 31.61Ac. 10.9 du/ac. PROPOSED 261 single-family lots1 31.61 Ac. 8.3 du/ac. % Change Difference of 84 units (±24% Less) ---- Difference of 2.6 du/ac. (±24% Less) Memorandum To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: August 21, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Public Hearing for Annexation Agreement Amendment Request As anticipated, the change in overall residential density is approximately 24% less in the proposed resubdivision of the development than the existing single-family detached residential land plan. With regard to the school site, the building foot print will encompass approximately 25,200 square feet of the approximately 31.61-acre site, well below the maximum 30% lot coverage allowed in the R-2 One-Family Residence District. This revised land plan for the school will require Final Plat approval with a recommendation forth coming from the Plan Commission. The Petitioner s intend to submit a final plat for Unit 2 in the future for approval and recordation. Annexation Agreement Request Attached is a copy of the Petitioners’ draft annexation agreement for the proposed new Ashley Pointe subdivision, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Below, are comments regarding the various sections of the proposed amended agreement which should be considered carefully by the City Council: 1. Final Plat: As previously mentioned, the Plan Commission has held a public hearing on August 14, 2013 regarding the proposed new final plat for the private Christian high school with a recommendation forthcoming. Therefore, paragraph 2, subparagraph C on page 2 should be revised to reflect the most updated revised version of the HR Green final plat plan. 2. Donations and Contributions: The Petitioners are seeking to receive credit against the Transportation Fee, typically $2,000/dwelling unit, for the required intersection improvements to IL Route 126 at Penman Road, Ashley Road and IL Route 126 and Ashley Road adjacent to the property. The cost of these improveme nts are estimated to exceed $1.4 million dollars versus the approximately $536,000 that would be collected in total from the proposed new residential dwelling units in the development (268 units x $2,000). The Petitioners are seeking to have this road contribution considered satisfied. 3. Land Cash: The Petitioners are requesting to revise the school and park land cash fees or provide land dedication as required under the terms of the amended agreement and set forth in a revised fee schedule (Exhibit E). They also propose that the land/cash contribution for parks be satisfied by the developer grading and seeding of a park site previously dedicated (indicated as “City Park” on attached plans) and the installation of a bicycle/pedestrian path. Staff maintains that the proposed grading and seeding of the park site is required per the Park Development Standards and cannot be used towards satisfying the contribution requirement. Further, staff has presented this request to the Park Board for their consideration and further discussion is provided below under “Land Cash/Park Board Comments”. 4. Security Instruments: A subdivision bond has been provided to the City estimating $1.9 million which ensures all public improvements (including roadway improvements) will be completed per the Subdivision Control Ordinance. The Petitioners are also requesting that a reduction in the bond to remove the obligation of the developer for street parkway tree installation and public side-walk improvements, as this would be the responsibility of the individual builders of the lots. This is similar to previously amended annexation agreements approved by the City Council in recent years (e.g. Grande Reserve, Blackberry Woods, Autumn Creek, Bristol Bay, etc.). 5. Amendments to Ordinances: The request is to have the ordinance and fee lock revised from five (5) years of the original annexation agreement, which has since expired, to a new ten (10) year lock commencing from the date of the approved amendment. This would lock all proposed fees and current ordinances for this development until 2023. 6. Fees and Charges: The Petitioners have proposed to use the attached fee sheet (Exhibit E) for the new Ashley Pointe Subdivision. Note that most of the proposed fees are consistent with the City’s current fee schedule with the exception of the development fees which has the following variations: The municipal building fee is proposed to revert back to the fee the original annexation agreement had established, but has since expired. The Library and Bristol -Kendall Fire fees reflect a partial prepayment by the developer (collected in May 2013), where fifty percent (50%) of the Library fee for Unit 1 was paid ($26,000) and fifty percent (50%) of the B KFD fee for Unit 1 ($52,000) was paid leaving the remaining units in this phase paying $250.00 per lot and $500.00 per lot, respectively, at time of building permit. The lots in Unit 2 of Ashley Pointe will be required to pay the full amounts. The Petitioners are also requesting to pay the Weather Warning Siren Fees ($75/acre) at time of building permit, rather than in full at time of final plat as typically done. The total amount to be paid equals $14,535.00 which is roughly $1,493.89 per lot. 7. Term of the Agreement: The original 20 year term limit of the initial Annexation Agreement shall apply, meaning the agreement and any amendment hereto is set to expire in April 2025. However, in the event that a permit for construction is issued within that time, then all provisions of the amended agreement shall be enforceable. 8. Parking for High School: The proposed high school development anticipates a gradual build- up of its student body of a period of time, therefore they are requesting to “land -bank” a portion of the required parking per ordinance. Specifically, the request is to construct forty percent (40%) of the required parking and the remaining sixty percent (60%) installed at a future date. While our Off-Street Parking Regulations of the City of Yorkvi lle’s Zoning Ordinance does not provide a mechanism for land-banking or phased construction of required parking, staff is supportive of this planning tool as it benefits the developer with lessening the upfront expense of asphalting a large area which will not immediately be needed; but more importantly, it reduces the amount of impervious surface lessening the storm water runoff. 9. Site Development: The Petitioners are seeking a site development permit issued prior to final engineering approval for mass grading work, and approval of building foundation only permit upon submittal of approved plans to allow for the start of construction this calendar year. This is similar to the request granted to the Kendall Crossing development to accommodate the construction schedule for the movie theater building. 10. Park Site: The request is to have the developer install a bicycle path within the previously dedicated park site (Lot 359) at a location approved by the City. While staff recognizes the proposed bicycle path on the City park site is planned to connect to a future private trail system on the school property, it should be noted that public sidewalk is already proposed for the park site which would link up to the trail system and would be a redundancy of efforts. DEVELOPMENT FEE CURRENT PROPOSED Municipal Building $1,759.00/unit $150.00/unit Library $500.00/unit $250 (Unit 1)/ $500 (Unit 2) per unit Bristol-Kendall Fire $1,000.00/unit $500 (Unit 1)/$1,000 (Unit 2) per unit Therefore, staff recommends in place of a bicycle path on this lot, the de veloper constructs a paved area at a size and in a location of the City’s choosing, to accommodate vehicular parking. 11. School Identification Sign: A request for one (1) free standing permanent school ground mounted/monument sign to be located off-site on a lot in Unit 1 near a main intersection is understandable from a visibility perspective. The proposed sign, illustrated in the attached signage elevations, would have a maximum height of 15 feet and a sign area of 50 square feet per side, inclusive of the electronic message display panel. This is larger in area and height than what is currently permitted for electronic message display panels for comm ercial users (32 sq. feet and 8 ft. maximum). Land Use/Zoning Considerations The property is currently zoned R -2 One-Family Residence District which has the following permitted uses per Section 10-6C-1, 10-6B-1 and 10-6A-1 of the City of Yorkville Zoning Ordinance: o Single-family detached dwellings o Accessory Uses o Off-Street Parking Facilities o Schools - public, private or denominational, elementary and high schools including playgrounds, garages for school buses and athletic fields, auxiliary thereto. All of the above permitted uses are proposed by the Petitioners for the redevelopment of the site. It is staff’s opinion that the proposed school and associated accessory uses (electronic scoreboard; permanent and temporary sponsor signage; athletic field lighting; outdoor parking; concession/restroom buildings; school bus parking and garage; and street parking) are out-right permitted in the R-2 zoning district. With regards to the retail store component and equestrian/riding arena, an argument can be made that this is also an accessory use and auxiliary to the primary use of the property which is an agricultural-based school curriculum. The mock silos used to house an internal stairway, proposed to exceed the maximum 35 feet building height for non -residential buildings and structures of the R-2 District, are more of an architectural component than a land use. As far as the remaining requested accessory uses of a cell tower and wind turbine/wind mill, they are typically identified as special uses in non -residential zoning districts. However, staff does not view these proposed accessory uses/structures as incompatible with the proposed school land use. Additional details regarding the placement of the accessory uses and size/dimensions will be required. Should the City Council feel the cell tower and wind turbine/wind mill not be appropriate to include as part of the annexation agreement out-right; it can be stipulated that these accessory structures be allowed as part of the development, subject to the special use approval process. Land Cash/Park Board Comments: The Petitioners are requesting a reduction in the valuation of an improved acre of land to $25,000/acre for the purposes of calculating land-cash fees for parks and schools based upon a recent appraisal of land value in the Yorkville area. Currently, an acre of improved land per Yorkville’s Land Cash Ordinance is $101,000.00. At the time of the original annexation agreement for the property, the land cash value was locked in at $80,000.00/acre for a period of five (5) years and has since expired. According to the Land Cash Ordinance (Ord. 1996-3 as amended), the developer is entitled to petition for a reduced land-cash fee by submitting an appraisal showing the fair-market value of such improved land in the area of the developm ent, with the final determination of the “fair market value” per acre of improved land made by the City Council. As mentioned previously, this request was taken to the Park Board at their meeting held in July and a collective recommendation is provided to the City Council in the attached memorandum. It is the Park Board’s recommendation to receive $80,000/acre cash for a total of $270,400, which can be reduced through the construction of an approved parking lot. If the City Council does not approve of $80,000/acre, an alternative is to not take a cash donation at this time and allow the P ark Board to request additional land or cash value at the time of Unit 2 platting. Staff Comments: Overall, staff is generally supportive of the proposed educational land use for this area of the former Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision. Schools and parks have typically been viewed as complimentary uses within residentially zoned districts, and this pr oposed land plan fits well within the center of this previously subdivided area. While a single lot with multiple uses/structures would typically be developed as a Planned Unit Development (PUD), the Petitioners and staff agree that the accessory uses (i.e., athletic fields, outdoor parking, bus parking/garage, etc.) and auxiliary facilities (e.g. equestrian/riding area, cell tower, and wind turbine/wind mill) for the proposed private school are either permitted per the Zoning Ordinance or complimentary to the overall land plan and redevelopment of this property as a private Christian high school with an agricultural program of study. Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioners’ Application w/attachments. 2. Ordinance 2005-30 Original Annexation Agreement for the Yorkville Farms Development (Prestwick of Yorkville) 3. Proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development prepared by John F. Philipchuck, attorney for the Petitioners, latest revision received August 15, 2013. 4. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision dated last revised 08/06/13 prepared by HR Green. 5. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Exhibit illustrating the proposed removed 84 single-family lots marked “FOR REFERENCE ONLY” dated 07/2/13 prepared by HR Green. 6. Yorkville Christian School - Vicinity Plan prepared by HR Green. 7. Sign and Floor Plan Study prepared by Norris Architects, Inc. dated 6/25/13. 8. Elevations and Monument Sign Study prepared by Norris Architects, Inc. dated 6/25/13. 9. EEI Letter to the City dated July 23, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 1. 10. EEI Letter to the City dated August 14, 2013 re: Final Plat Review 11. Memorandum from Director of Parks and Recreation to City Council dated August 8, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Subdivision. 12. Appraisal Report As the City Council will recall, a public hearing was the request for Amended Annexation Agreement for the Prestwick of Yorkville development was conducted during the August 27, 2013 meeting. Since then the applicant has submitted revised plans and amended portions of the proposed amended annexation agreement to address the comments and concerns expressed during the public hearing. Annexation Agreement Request Attached is a copy of the Petitioners’ most recent draft annexation agreement for the proposed new Ashley Pointe subdivision, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Below, are comments regarding the various sections of the proposed amended agreement which should be considered carefully by the City Council: 1. Final Plat: The Plan Commission held a public hearing on August 14, 2013 regarding the proposed new final plat for the private Christian high school with a formal recommendation of approval (see attached). A subsequent submittal has been provided by the Petitioner dated August 6, 2013 and staff recommends approval subject to comments provided by EEI in a recent review letter dated September 5, 2013. 2. Park Site: The Petitioners have agreed to remove their initial request that the land/cash contribution for parks be satisfied by the developer grading and seeding of a park site previously dedicated (indicated as “City Park” on attached plans) and move forward with staff’s recommendation to construct a paved area at a size and in a location of the City’s choosing to accommodate vehicular parking and receive credit for such an improvement against the land cash contribution. 3. Fees and Charges: The Petitioners have proposed to use the attached fee sheet (Exhibit E) f or the new Ashley Pointe Subdivision. The water connection fee has been revised from $2,660 to $3,700 to reflect the current rate for a single family home. Land Use/Zoning Considerations The Petitioner has revised their request for accessory uses to include only the following which are permitted per the current R-2 One-Family Residence District zoning: o Single-family detached dwellings o Accessory Uses o Off-Street Parking Facilities o Schools - public, private or denominational, elementary and high schools including playgrounds, garages for school buses and athletic fields, auxiliary thereto. Memorandum To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: September 5, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Request for Annexation Agreement Amendment & Final Plat The Petitioner has also opted to remove the request for the previously proposed following accessory structures: o Cell telephone tower; not to exceed 120’ in height o Wind Turbine/wind mill; not to exceed 120’ in height o Athletic field lighting poles not to exceed 90’ in height o Mock silos for internal stairways adjacent to the building; not to exceed 80’ in height. o Height of the school building to be up to fifty (50) feet and the silos up to eight (80) feet. o Free standing permanent school ground mounted identification sign up to fifteen feet (15’) in height; double faced and fifty (50) square feet of signage per side, including an electronic message display panel. The Petitioner has the right to seek variances or special uses, as required by ordinance, to be allowed to install such accessory structures at a later time. Land Cash/Park Board Comments: Again, the Petitioners are requesting a reduction in the valuation of an improved acre of land to $25,000/acre for the purposes of calculating land-cash fees for parks and schools based upon a recent appraisal of land value in the Yorkville area. Per the current Land Cash Ordinance, an acre of improved land is valued at $101,000.00. However, at the time of the original annexation agreement for the property, the land cash value was locked in at $80,000.00/acre for a period of five (5) years and has since expired. Staff is now recommending land cash valuation of $58,000 per acre of improved land for land cash value for this development (refer to the attached memo from the City Administrator). Although the Land Cash Ordinance (Ord. 1996-3 as amended) permits the developer to petition for a reduced land-cash fee by submitting an appraisal showing the fair -market value of such improved land in the area of the development, with the final determination of the “fair market value” per acre of improved land made by the City Council; staff has presented this proposed reduction request before the Park Board which recommended against the $25,000/acre offer and suggested $80,000/acre or to not take a cash donation at this time and to request additional land or cash value at the time of Unit 2 platting. Engineering Comments: The City Engineer has reviewed the Final Engineering Plans, Storm Sewer Design Reports and Traffic Impact Study submitted by HR Green and prepared review comments related to such documents in a letter dated September 5, 2013 (attached). In general, there are no significant issues related to the storm sewer design or traffic study findings. The comments provided can be, and are typically, addressed at a staff level for review and approval before such permits as mass grading, stormwater management and building are issued for construction. Staff Comments: Overall, staff is supportive of the proposed educational land use for this area of the former Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision and is confident that the engineering comments, which are subject to approval of the proposed amended annexation agreement and final plat of approval, can be addressed to the satisfaction of our ordinances during the staff level review. Attachments: 1. Proposed First Amendment to the Annexation Agreement of Yorkville Farms Development prepared by John F. Philipchuck, attorney for the Petitioners, and further revised by City Staff on September 5, 2013. 2. EEI Letter to the City dated September 5, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 2. 3. Storm Sewer Design Report prepared by HR Green, dated August 22, 2013. 4. Traffic Impact Study prepared by KLOA, Inc. dated August 22, 2013. Petitioner’s Request & Background: In April 2005, the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision (fka Highlands at Ashley Pointe), located in the southwest quadrant of IL Route 126 and Ashley Road, was granted annexation agreement approval via Ord. 2005-30 to construct a total of 345 single-family residential dwelling units on approximately 190 acres of land in two (2) phases to be platted as Unit 1 and Unit 2 within the R-2 One-Family Residence District. While both Units 1 and 2 were given Final Plat appro val (Res. 2005-78 and Res. 2006-82, respectively), only Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville subdivision was recorded. Currently, four (4) single family homes in Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision have been constructed. Since that time, the subdivision’s original developer lost the property in foreclosure and ownership reverted back to Homestar Bank in 2012. The new proposals calls for the resubdivision of Lot 358 in Unit 1 of the Prestwick of Yorkville Subdivision and removes 84 lots originally contained in a portion of Unit 2 (refer to attached reference plat). The new Final Plat of Subdivision for the Yorkville Christian School consists of ~31.61 acres of land planned for a state-of-the-art 60,000 square foot, three-level private secondary education facility, athletic fields, on-site parking and other accessory structures. Approximately 5.54 acres will be utilized for retention area and open space to be conveyed to the future homeowners association (HOA). Finally, the remaining 6.48 acres will be dedicated for public right-of-way as Whitekirk Lane and Mustang Way. Plan Commission Action The Plan Commission reviewed the requested rezoning at a public hearing held on August 14, 2013 and made the following favorable action on the motion below: In consideration of the proposed Final Plat of Subdivision for the Yorkville Christian School Subdivision, the Plan Commission recommends approval to the City Council of a request for Final Plat approval, as presented by the Petitioner in a plan prepared by HR Green date last revised August 6, 2013, subject to review comments prepared by the City’s Engineering Consultant, EEI, in a letter dated July 23, 2013 as stated in a staff recommendation provided in a memorandum dated August 8, 2013 and further subject to City Council approval of the amended annexation agreement allowing a school and accessory structures as a permitted land use in the P restwick of Yorkville subdivision {insert any additional conditions of the Plan Commission}… Action Item: Lindblom-aye; Weaver- aye; Prochaska-aye, Jones-aye, Baker-aye 5 ayes; 0 nays Attachments: 1. Copy of Petitioner’s Application w/attachments. 2. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision dated last revised 08/06/13 prepared by HR Green. 3. Final Plat of Subdivision – Yorkville Christian School Subdivision Exhibit illustrating the proposed removed 84 single-family lots marked “FOR REFERENCE ONLY” dated 07/2/13 prepared by HR Green. Memorandum To: City Council From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator Date: September 5, 2013 Subject: PC 2013-13 Prestwick of Yorkville – Yorkville Christian School Final Plat Approval 4. Yorkville Christian School - Vicinity Plan prepared by HR Green. 5. EEI Letter to the City dated July 23, 2013 re: Yorkville Christian School Final Engineering Plan Review No. 1.