Loading...
Plan Commission Packet 2007 11-14-07 0 United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road EST 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 04 Telephone : 630-553 -4350 O 60 9 Fax: 630-553 -7575 a ., > O Nsn&RCaunry LE PLAN`Vv PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA Wednesday, November 14, 2007 City Council Chambers 800 Game Farm Road Meeting Called to Order: 7:30 p.m. Roll Call: Previous Meeting Minutes: October 10, 2007 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Hearings: Requested by Petitioners PC 2007-35 The Letterle Annexation and Zoning public hearing will be held at the December 12, 2007 Plan Commission meeting. 1 . PC 2007- 36, PC 2007-36, Stanley and Diane Pobol, petitioners, have filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting R- 1 zoning classification, upon annexation to the United City of Yorkville, approved by the City Council on October 9, 2007. The real property consists of approximately 4.53 acres, located a 9255 Lisbon Road, Yorkville, Illinois. Action Items i. Annexation ii. Zoning iii. Special Use 2. PC 2007-37, McCue Builders, Inc., petitioners, have filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois requesting an amendment to a Planned Unit Development Agreement. The real property consists of approximately 60 acres located south of Route 34 on Cannonball Trail, in the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois. Action Items L PUD Amendment 3 . The Village of Montgomery, Illinois, and the United City of Yorkville are considering approval of a Boundary Line Agreement pursuant to 65 ILLS 5/ 11 -12-9. Action Items i. Boundary Agreement New Business 1 . PC 2007-38 Menard's 6th Addition - Action Items i. Preliminary Plan ii. Final Plat Presentation 1 . Countryside Center Concept Development Plan by Triland Page 1 of UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS Wednesday, October 10, 2007 7:00pm Chairman Anne Lucietto called the meeting to order at 7:03pm. Roll Call: Members present John Hegeler, Sandra Adams, Tom Lindblom, Jeff Baker, Mike Crouch, Charles Kraupner, Clarence Holdiman, Anne Lucietto Absent: Jack Jones, Brian Schillinger A quorum was established City Staff And Visitors: Travis Miller-Community Development Director, Dan Kramer-Attorney, John Roesch, Samantha Duda, Eric Saunders, Tom Gilmour, Chris Lindley-Christopher Burke Engineering, Tony Zangler, Tom O'Brien-Thomas Alarm Systems, Matt Schury-Kendall County Record, Jason Pesola, Mike Frick, Julie Polhill, Roxane Griesmann, Ken Griesmann, Gregg Ingemunson-Attorney, William Dunn-Engineering Enterprises, Christine Vitosh-Court Reporter, Mike Bollweg Minutes: September 12, 2007 Lindblom made a motion to approve the minutes as presented and Baker seconded the motion. Passed unanimously on a voice vote. Public Hearings: Chairman Lucietto entertained a motion to enter into Public Hearing. Holdiman and Adams moved and seconded to enter into the Hearings and this motion passed unanimously on a voice vote. Lucietto asked all who wished to speak to be sworn in as a group. 1 . PC 2007-30 Roger and Betty Jensen. The petitioners requested a continuance to November 14, 2007. Crouch and Lindblom moved and seconded to continue this hearing. The motion passed by a voice vote with all in favor. 2. PC 2007-23, Anthony and Nicole Zangler, petitioners, have filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illnois, requesting annexation to the United City of Yorkville and zoning to the United City of Yorkville R- 1 One Family Residence District. The real property consists of approximately 5.7 acres, located at 96 Quinsey Lane, Bristol Township, Kendall County Illinois. Page 2 of The Plan Council has recommended annexation and the petitioner wishes to build one house on this property. Attorney Ingemunson added that there are some easement issues. Chairman Lucietto asked for public comments: Julie Polhill She lives next to the property and expressed concern about the possible bike path. Samantha Duda, 402 Johnson St. She said there is a garbage dumpster on Quinsey Lane for people who live along the river. She asked if the dumpster could be moved east. She also inquired if the driveway would be an access for several homes or just the Zangler's. Ken Griesmann He is the present owner of the property and said he did not feel it was right for the Zanglers to relinquish so many easements on that small of a property. He spoke against the pathway and additional easements. Mike Bollweg He owns property on the east side of the petitioners and also is not in favor of the bike path, however, he is in favor of the possible sewer and water easement. Mike Frick He lives west of the property and spoke out against the bike path and said taxes are high enough. John Roesch, 98 Quinsey He asked if the remaining properties along Quinsey Lane would be annexed if this annexation is approved. There were no further comments and the Public Hearing was closed on a motion by Baker and second by Hegeler. Unanimous approval of motion by voice vote. Travis Miller reviewed staff comments. He first stated that the City is not seeking to annex the remaining property on Quinsey Lane and he noted that Quinsey Lane is a private road. There is a possibility of future sewer hookups, however. The property being discussed automatically becomes R-1 zoning with annexation and staff recommended three easements to be dedicated: utility easement, extension of sanitary sewer easement and trail easement. The trail would connect to the Heartland development. He said staff has recommended that Quinsey Lane remain private. Kraupner noted that Heartland has planned street stubs into the Quinsey Lane area. The Zanglers do not plan to subdivide their property and therefore there would not be a need for a connection. Page 3 of It was noted that the Zanglers are also opposed to a bike path, but would be OK with a sewer pipe being installed if it was done at the time of their home construction. The Commission members generally agreed they would not want a bike path there, however, they agreed that a sewer pipe installation and utility easement would make good sense at the time of construction. Action Items 1 . Annexation Tom Lindblom made a motion to recommend approval of the annexation as presented, omitting the bike path. Jeff Baker seconded the motion and the motion carried on a roll call vote: Adams-aye, Baker-aye, Hegeler-aye, Lindblom-aye, Holdiman-aye, Crouch- aye, Kraupner-nay, Lucietto-aye. 3 . PC 2007-32, Thomas O'Brien, Thomas Alarm System, petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting rezoning from R-2 One-Family Resident District to the United City of Yorkville B-3 Service Business District. The real property commonly known as Lot 1 of the North Bridge Street Subdivision, consists of approximately 0.2 acres, located at 711 North Bridge Street, United City of Yorkville, Kendall County Illinois. Ms. Lucietto entertained a motion to enter into Public Hearing for the above. It was moved and seconded by Crouch and Lindblom respectively, to enter into Public Hearing PC 2007-32. Unanimous approval. Mr. Thomas O'Brien, 711 N. Bridge, asked for zoning from residential R-2 to business B-3 on this property in order to operate his business. It is located on the west side of Somonauk and Appletree. There was no comment and a motion was made by Lindblom and seconded by Crouch to close the Hearing. Motion approved unanimously. Action Item 1 . Rezoning There was no discussion regarding this request and a motion was made by Crouch to approve the zoning to B-3. Hegeler seconded the motion and it was approved by all on a roll call vote: Baker-aye, Hegeler-aye, Lindblom-aye, Holdiman-aye, Crouch-aye, Kraupner-aye, Adams-aye, Lucietto-aye. 4. PC 2007-33, Virginia Welles, petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting zoning to the United City Page 4 of of Yorkville R-1 One Family Residence District. The real property consists of approximately 250.65 acres, located at 13873 Walker Road, Fox Township, Kendall County Illinois. It was moved and seconded by Baker and Crouch to enter into Public Hearing PC 2007-33. A voice vote unanimously approved this motion. Attorney Dan Kramer was present on behalf of the petitioner. He said this property had been annexed the previous night at the City Council meeting. This property is in the midst of agricultural property and is off Hollonback and Walker Roads. He asked for a recommendation of "estate zoning". He added that property owner, Virginia Welles, takes great pride in the fact that her ancestors were the first white settlers in the county and she does not want the property developed. This is the reason for the zoning request. There was no further comment and a motion was made by Crouch and seconded by Adams to close the Public Hearing. Unanimous approval on a voice vote. It was noted that this property shares boundaries on three sides, with the formerly proposed Fox Moraine property. Travis Miller suggested that the Findings of Fact should be considered when making the decision on the zoning. Chairman Lucietto briefly reviewed this. Attorney Kramer noted there are 5 or 6 properties zoned "estate" near the Welles property. After brief discussion, Baker moved and Hegeler seconded to recommend estate zoning as requested. Motion passed unanimously on a roll call vote: Baker-aye, Hegeler-aye, Lindblom-aye, Holdiman-aye, Crouch-aye, Kraupner-aye, Adams-aye, Lucietto-aye. New Business 1 . PC 2007-25, The Fields at Westhaven Action Items- 1 . Preliminary Plan Trevor Ryan of Marquette Land represents the owners of the property purchased in 2005 and is near Baseline Road. At that time, there was a PUD and it was amended in 2006. The 161 -acre residential portion is at the northwest part of the site. A Land Vision representative showed a preliminary plan of the 164-acre site. They have been working with Plan Council, staff, the school and parks regarding the site. The development will include 261 lots with average lot size of 13,435 square foot and a gross density of 1 .6. Baseline Road is the main north-side collector road. Page 5 of Concern included having a major collector so close to a school. Concerns from Lindblom included 22 lots being inaccessible due to a 1 -way in/l -way out and two streets called Keystone. Chairman Lucietto agreed and said the Plan Commission always favors two ways in/out. Also, much traffic would be added to the Rt. 30/47/Baseline Road area and improvements would be needed. Mr. Ryan said the Beecher Road extension would ease some of that. Travis Miller offered comments from the staff report and some of those are as follows. He said if this development precedes Bailey Meadows, timing would be an issue in regards to infrastructure, water etc . The city does allow for recapture and front-fund agreements. He also noted that the 15 acre land cash donation is above the required amount. In addition, the area south of the Corn Ed easement is age-restricted and the property will not be a burden on the school system. He recommended that the preliminary plan move forward with a further delineation of the boundaries of the school/park site. Bill Dunn of EEI told the developer that a watermain will go through the school/park site and said no building can be built in that area. Commission member Hegeler asked about widening of Rt. 47 since many collector roads will empty onto it. Funding is the problem at this time. In conjunction with that question, Miller noted that two commercial developments planned along Rt. 47 would require two points of access and an IDOT permit is required. Miller also said that the developer agreed to pay for a portion of Rt. 47 improvements in their agreement. There was no farther discussion and Lindblom made a motion to approve this development subject to staff concerns and the following points: landlocking and the collector road. Hegeler seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken: Lindblom-aye, Holdiman-aye, Crouch-aye, Kraupner-aye, Adams-aye, Baker-aye, Hegeler-aye, Lucietto-aye. Motion passed unanimously. Additional Business: A 2008 tentative meeting schedule was handed out for review. Chairman Lucietto summarized the recent consortium meeting that she and Sandra Adams attended. IDOT and Fran Klaas attended and addressed questions regarding area roads. November 15th is the next meeting date and the topic will be preserving the rural nature. In January, historic preservation will be discussed. Information from the meetings is posted on the City website Page 6 of Travis Miller reviewed the Comp Plan Steering Committee. He would like to meet once a month beginning in November. He expects it will be a 2-hour meeting. Information will be given out for the fixture meetings regarding structure and topics. He would like to schedule two open houses for the public to attend. Chairman Lucietto suggested asking each Alderman to recommend one person from their ward to be part of the committee also and she will present this idea at the November 13`h Council meeting. Ms. Lucietto said there will also be a webpage regarding this committee. She said Platteville has invited her to explain how the Plan Commission works and she would like all Plan Commission members to attend. She also handed out name tags for all commission members for these upcoming meetings. Discussion turned to the boundary agreement between Yorkville and Montgomery. Miller reported that the two staffs have met and drafted an agreement. Council has discussed it and they also asked for Plan Commission input. Documents will be in the packets for next month' s meeting. Miller presented a map that showed the boundaries. Lindblom asked if residents along Galena Road would have input as to what town they would belong. He also asked about the Willowbrook subdivision and noted that those residents have more connection with Yorkville largely due to the schools. He said those people should have input into any decision. Miller said public notices would be posted and they would have a chance to attend meetings. Lucietto suggested discussions should be held with the residents. The Storybook subdivision was also included in this discussion. Crouch concurred with this opinion and said he felt Yorkville would not forcibly annex this area. However, he did not know about Montgomery. He felt those residents would be upset if forcibly annexed where they did not want to be. There will be further discussions next month. Hegeler inquired if Yorkville had any plans for a Yorkville train station since it would ease traffic. It is included on the comp plan on the east side of Yorkville. A comparison was made to Oswego who has a park `n ride, however, there is no train station there. Metra would ultimately decide where a station would be located. There was no further discussion and a motion was made by Crouch to adjourn the meeting. Hegeler seconded the motion and it carried unanimously on a voice vote at 8 :54pm. Minutes respectfully submitted by Marlys Young, Minute Taker PLAN COMMISSION MEETING UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , ILLINOIS REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had at the meeting of the above - entitled matter taken before CHRISTINE M . VITOSH , C . S . R . , on October 10 , 2007 , at the hour of 7 : 00 p . m . , at 800 Game Farm Road , in the City of Yorkville , Illinois . reporting service 1212 South Naper Boulevard • Suite 119-185 • Naperville, IL 60540 • 630-983-0030 • Fax 630.299.5153 www.depocourt.com 2 1 P R E S E N T : 2 MS . ANNE LUCIETTO , Chairman ; 3 MR . TOM LINDBLOM ; 4 MR . CLARENCE HOLDIMAN ; 5 MS . SANDRA ADAMS ; 6 MR . CHARLES KRAUPNER ; 7 MR . MICHAEL CROUCH ; 8 MR . JEFF BAKER ; 9 MR . JOHN HEGELER ; 10 MR . TRAVIS MILLER ; 11 MS . MARLYS YOUNG . 12 13 - - - - - 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 3 1 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : I need a motion 2 to move into public hearing . 3 MR . HOLDIMAN : Moved . 4 MS . ADAMS : Second . 5 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Moved and 6 seconded . All in favor say aye . 7 ( A Chorus of Ayes ) 8 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : All in favor , 9 nay . 10 ( No Response ) 11 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : We are currently 12 in public hearing . Now I ' m going to ask anyone 13 that is going to speak to please stand up and 14 raise your right hand . 15 ( Witnesses sworn ) 16 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Our first public 17 hearing is PC 2007 - 30 , Roger and Betty Jensen . I 18 am told that the petitioner has requested that it 19 be continued again to November 14 . We continued 20 this from last month . Do we need a motion to 21 continue it ? Yes . Okay . 22 Do we have a motion to 23 continue ? 24 MR . CROUCH : So moved . Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 4 1 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . Mike . 2 MR . HOLDIMAN : Second . 3 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : All in favor say 4 aye . 5 ( A Chorus of Ayes ) 6 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Not in favor , 7 nay . 8 ( No Response ) 9 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . We will 10 move on then , and that will be continued to the 11 November 14th , 2007 meeting . 12 The next item in the public 13 hearings is PC 2007 - 23 , Anthony and Nicole 14 Zangler . 15 WHEREUPON : 16 GREGG INGEMUNSON , 17 having been first duly sworn , testified before 18 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 19 MR . INGEMUNSON : Hi . 20 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Hi . 21 MR . INGEMUNSON : Do you guys have 22 copies of - - There should be a couple - - plat of 23 topography and a plat of annexation , one of each . 24 MR . HOLDIMAN : Gregg - - Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 5 1 MR . INGEMUNSON : Okay . That ' s the 2 newest version , that ' s - - 3 MR . HOLDIMAN : The plat , but it 4 shows the location . 5 MR . INGEMUNSON : Well , to give you a 6 little background , we came through I think on a 7 mile and a half review - - I don ' t know , did we go 8 through this , Travis , with the Plan Commission - - 9 MR . MILLER : No . 10 MR . INGEMUNSON : We didn ' t make it 11 that far . What happened is we went to Plan 12 Council and they recommended annexation , so we 13 came back through and said okay , if the City 14 wants to annex , then we will be happy to do that , 15 so we are in here requesting annexation . 16 It ' s about 5 . 7 acres on Quincy 17 Lane just east of Woodworth Estates , and we ' re 18 really just requesting annexation and then 19 default zoning to R1 where we would build one 20 house . 21 Travis and I have spoken 22 about - - One additional reason we didn ' t want to 23 annex was because of the cost to hook up to the 24 sewer , which would have been 7 - - 6 or $ 7 , 000 an Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 6 1 acre , and with the five acres , we are looking at 2 rather costly . 3 So Travis has had some 4 conversations with Ralph , and I have not yet , but 5 I am going to . We ' re going to try to limit one 6 acre into annexation into YBSD to keep that cost 7 down , and , of course , there will be no other 8 buildings or permits issued on this property , so 9 we would only be building one house on here on 10 approximately 5 . 7 acres , so we would request 11 annexation to be able to actually accomplish 12 that , and we ' ve had some discussions with the 13 City , and there is some easement issues we ' ve 14 talked about . I ' m sure Travis will go into that 15 a little bit , but at this point , I ' ll request a 16 positive recommendation on annexation to the 17 City . 18 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . Now , if 19 anyone has any comments from the public , this is 20 your time to voice them . 21 What I ' m going to ask , if you 22 would come up to the microphone , state your name 23 and where you live , and then clearly state what 24 your issue or question is . Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 7 1 WHEREUPON : 2 JULIE POLHILL , 3 having been first duly sworn , testified before 4 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 5 MS . POLHILL : Okay . I ' m Julie 6 Polhill . I live in Woodworth Estates , which is 7 directly next to his client , and some neighbors 8 and I had some questions because we heard that 9 there was a possible bike path , which we are not 10 at all interested in on that easement , and I was 11 wondering if that was going to be a possibility 12 or what we could do to protest the bike path . 13 MR . INGEMUNSON : Well , we don ' t want 14 it either , so we ' re happy they don ' t want it 15 because we don ' t want it , so as much as they can 16 protest , we are happy about that . 17 MR . HOLDIMAN : Gregg , does two 18 negatives make a positive ? 19 MS . POLHILL : It ' s a positive if it 20 works in our favor . 21 MR . INGEMUNSON : Exactly . I like it 22 when people come up and speak on things that are 23 on our behalf . 24 MS . POLHILL : Yes , we would love Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 8 1 them as neighbors without a bike path . 2 MR . INGEMUNSON : Which we would love 3 to be neighbors without a bike path . 4 MS . POLHILL : I ' m just wondering if 5 you could shed some light on what the City is 6 planning . 7 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : You know what , 8 we usually have a really big discussion 9 afterwards . We try to get all the facts together 10 at the public hearings . We are going to go 11 through all the public hearings and then we ' re 12 going to talk about it , and then at that point we 13 can answer questions , and if you have more 14 questions that come from that , we can answer 15 then . 16 MS . POLHILL : Okay . Great . 17 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . Great . 18 WHEREUPON : 19 SAMANTHA DUDA , 20 having been first duly sworn , testified before 21 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 22 MS . DUDA : My name is Samantha Duda . 23 I live at 402 Johnson Street . Behind our house 24 on Quincy Drive there is a garbage dumpster for Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 9 1 the houses that are along the river , so we were 2 wondering if anything is going to be done about 3 that because that technically will be those 4 people ' s driveway when they - - if they were to 5 move in there . We don ' t want the garbage 6 dumpster there either . 7 And then the path - - actually 8 Quincy Lane , if that was going to be their 9 driveway , is that going to be access to all the 10 other people that live on the river or are they 11 going to build a different access off of Tuma . 12 We heard rumors about there was 13 going to be a different access off of Tuma for 14 the houses along the river and this was going to 15 be access only for the people moving in . 16 MR . INGEMUNSON : The access is going 17 to remain the same . There is no change for the 18 access . It will be the access for the people , 19 for them , and on the river . 20 As far as the dumpster , I think 21 they are trying to move that . 22 MR . ZANGLER : We are trying to move 23 that to the east . 24 MR . INGEMUNSON : East end . Because Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 10 1 they don ' t like that dumpster where its at . 2 MS . DUDA : Right . 3 MR . INGEMUNSON : And they are 4 looking to move that on the east end of the 5 property , is that right , Tony ? 6 MR . ZANGLER : Yes . 7 MR . INGEMUNSON : When I said eastern 8 side - - the dumpster is on the western side . 9 MS . DUDA : Okay . Of the street . So 10 they ' re just going to move it - - 11 MR . INGEMUNSON : No , no , all the way 12 down the lane . Where it curves all the way down 13 to the end . 14 MS . DUDA : Okay . 15 MR . INGEMUNSON : Not just across the 16 little section of the street , all the way down to 17 the western edge . Is that right ? 18 MR . ZANGLER : Eastern side . 19 MR . INGEMUNSON : Eastern side of the 20 property , so 300 feet away approximately . 21 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : That answers 22 your question ? 23 MS , DUDA : Yes . 24 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . Great . Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 11 1 Thank you . 2 WHEREUPON : 3 KEN GRIESMAN , 4 having been first duly sworn , testified before 5 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 6 MR . GRIESMAN : My name is Ken 7 Griesman ( phonetic ) . My wife and I are the 8 present owners of the land to be rezoned . We 9 don ' t feel it ' s right of you to expect the buyers 10 to give up so many easements on this small five 11 and three quarter acre property . 12 If the Zanglers were 13 subdivision developers , we could understand 14 requiring them to put in a pathway and full 15 subdivision , but the Zanglers are not developers . 16 They are a family and they want to build one 17 home . 18 The buildable portion of this 19 property is not that large . The southern section 20 along the river is floodplain and there are 21 already two easements on the property . There is 22 a 30 foot by 765 foot easement on the westerly 23 side and a 16 foot easement exists along the 24 northerly end . Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 12 1 You are asking for more 2 easements that will further divide this property . 3 We understand that sometime in the future a 4 sanitary sewer line needs to be provided . We are 5 not opposed to this improvement , but the work 6 needs to be completed now . The sanitary sewer 7 line should be located in an area agreeable to 8 both the City and the Zanglers . 9 There are not many pieces of 10 land like this left in Yorkville . It ' s quiet , 11 tree covered , secluded , and peaceful , a perfect 12 place to put up a large , beautiful home and raise 13 a family . 14 We are opposed to the pathway 15 from Heartland Circle to our property . The 16 homeowners next to the proposed pathway are also 17 opposed . We do not know of any other subdivision 18 in the City that has a pathway from their 19 property to the river . 20 Safe access from this same 21 riverside area is already available by sidewalks 22 on Bruell Street . It seems unnecessary to add 23 expense to the taxpayers for something that 24 already exists . Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 13 1 In conclusion , we hope that you 2 will reconsider your position on requiring the 3 Zanglers to grant these additional easements and 4 abandon your plans for a pathway through this 5 land . 6 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Thank you . Is 7 there anyone else ? Need you to tell us your name 8 verbally , too . 9 WHEREUPON : 10 MIKE POHLWEG , 11 having been first duly sworn , testified before 12 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 13 MR . POHLWEG : One second . I ' m 14 sorry . My name is Mike Pohlweg . I own the 15 property adjacent on - - excuse me , on the east 16 side of the lot in question for rezoning , and , 17 once again , I am not in favor of this bike path 18 because I have no idea where its path is going to 19 connect to the north and how it ' s going to tie 20 into the Heartland subdivision because that ' s 21 only - - that ' s a very narrow lane there and it ' s 22 the real easement for getting in and out of the 23 Quincy Lane subdivision and my property , so once 24 again , I know the City ' s evidently in favor of Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 14 1 this bike path , but it ' s nothing that I would be 2 in favor of or of any residents that I know of on 3 Quincy Lane . 4 Also , the sewer and water 5 potential easement that ' s heading east to my 6 property , I am in favor of that , and I think 7 would be a good idea for future potential 8 development if that happens someday . 9 I am in favor of that , but not 10 the bike path , so that ' s all I can say . 11 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Thank you . Is 12 there anyone else ? 13 WHEREUPON : 14 MIKE FRICK , 15 having been first duly sworn , testified before 16 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 17 MR . FRICK : My name is Mike Frick 18 and I live west of the properties along the 19 easement , and I don ' t want a bike path simply 20 because I don ' t want to pay for it , I feel my 21 taxes are high enough , and that ' s really my 22 major - - my major concern is taxes are high 23 enough . Thank you . 24 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Thank you . Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 15 1 Anyone else ? 2 WHEREUPON : 3 JOHN ROESCH , 4 having been first duly sworn , testified before 5 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 6 MR . ROESCH : My name is John Roesch . 7 I own the property at 98 Quincy Lane . I have no 8 problem with the rezoning of this acreage . 9 I have a question as to in the 10 future if this - - if this annexation goes 11 through , the status of the remaining properties 12 along the lane . Does that mean that the City of 13 Yorkville would be looking towards annexation of 14 the remaining properties ? That ' s the question . 15 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Thank you . 16 Anyone else ? 17 ( No Response ) 18 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . When we 19 close the public hearing , we will come back and 20 discuss this as a committee , and then at that 21 point we usually - - if there is extra questions 22 or whatever , we do entertain them . 23 MR . HOLDIMAN : Haven ' t we gone out 24 of public hearings to deal with this issue one at Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 16 1 a time ? 2 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Yes , but with 3 the length , I thought we would do it once . 4 MR . HOLDIMAN : Okay , due to the 5 number of people there for this - - it ' s your 6 call . 7 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : That ' s fine . 8 I ' ll entertain a motion to close the public 9 hearing . 10 MR . BAKER : So moved , Baker . 11 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Is there a 12 second ? 13 MR . HOLDIMAN : Second . 14 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : All in favor say 15 aye . 16 ( A Chorus of Ayes ) 17 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Not in favor , 18 say nay . 19 ( No Response ) 20 ( discussion had off 21 the record ) 22 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Entertain a 23 motion to open the public hearing for PC 2007 - 32 , 24 Thomas O ' Brien , Thomas Alarm System . Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 17 1 MR . CROUCH : So moved . 2 MR . HOLDIMAN : Second . 3 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : All in favor ? 4 ( A Chorus of Ayes ) 5 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Not in favor ? 6 ( No Response ) 7 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Who is speaking 8 on behalf of Thomas O ' Brien ? 9 WHEREUPON : 10 THOMAS O ' BRIEN , 11 having been first duly sworn , testified before 12 the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 13 MR . O ' BRIEN : Yes . I am Tom 14 O ' Brien , 711 North Bridge . 15 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Do you want to 16 tell us a little bit about what you are trying to 17 do ? 18 MR . O ' BRIEN : I am changing the 19 zoning from residential to business . 20 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : And your 21 property is located where ? 22 MR . O ' BRIEN : 711 North Bridge . 23 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : So that ' s on 47 ? 24 MR . O ' BRIEN : Correct . Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 18 1 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Can you describe 2 the area just so that everybody can picture it ? 3 MR . O ' BRIEN : Between Somonauk and 4 Apple Tree on the west side of the road . 5 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . So you 6 want to go from R2 One - Family Business District 7 to B3 Service Business District so you can 8 operate your business there ? 9 MR . O ' BRIEN : Correct . I already 10 have been . 11 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Did you have any 12 other comments or was that it ? 13 MR . O ' BRIEN : No . 14 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : That was pretty 15 much it ? Okay . So that we can have further 16 discussion , I entertain a motion to close the 17 public hearing . 18 MR . HOLDIMAN : So moved . 19 MR . BAKER : Second . 20 MR . KRAUPNER : Did you ask for the 21 public ? 22 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Oh . Is there 23 anyone here that wants to speak on this one ? 24 ( No Response ) Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 19 1 ( discussion had off 2 the record ) 3 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Entertain a 4 motion for PC 2007 - 33 , Virginia Welles . 5 MR . CROUCH : So moved . 6 MR . BAKER : So moved . 7 MR . CROUCH : Second . 8 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . Thank 9 you . All in favor say aye . 10 ( A Chorus of Ayes ) 11 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Not in favor ? 12 ( No Response ) 13 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : We are in public 14 hearing . 15 WHEREUPON : 16 DANIEL J . KRAMER , 17 having been first duly sworn , testified before IS the Yorkville Plan Commission as follows : 19 MR . KRAMER : Good evening . My name 20 is Daniel J . Kramer . My address is 1107A South 21 Bridge Street , Yorkville , Illinois , 60560 . I am 22 an attorney licensed to practice law in the State 23 of Illinois and represent Virginia Welles . 24 This matter is up before you Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 20 1 tonight , and some of you may think this might be 2 a bit the cart before the horse . 3 We actually annexed this 4 property to the City of Yorkville last evening at 5 the Council meeting . You haven ' t seen it a lot 6 over the years , but if a property owner is 7 willing to annex property and go automatically to 8 the default zoning classification and if there 9 isn ' t a written annexation agreement that the 10 developer or owner wants something special or the 11 City wants something special , the City can simply 12 do that without public hearing , and so the 13 annexation ordinance has I hope been signed by 14 today , but it was unanimously approved by the 15 City Council last night . 16 To get zoning other than the 17 default zoning , we need to do the public hearing 18 in front of the Plan Commission , and actually we 19 filed this petition asking for the default 20 zoning , which is Rl Single Family . 21 Frankly , the area we ' re in , out 22 off of Route 71 , Hollenbeck Road and Walker Road , 23 is very agriculturally based at this time , and we 24 had discussions with your City Community Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 21 1 Development Director about perhaps not going to 2 default zoning . 3 A little bit of 4 statutory history ; it used to be pretty much all 5 the time that your R1 would be the default or the 6 most restrictive zoning in any community . You 7 actually have two categories that I would 8 consider less dense or more restrictive ; that 9 being estate , and you also have an ag zoning . 10 We feel that the estate zoning 11 would be perfectly appropriate for this property , 12 and we would be satisfied if you gave a 13 recommendation to the City Council to zone it 14 estate zoning , and as long as we publish for a 15 more dense or a more intense use than R1 , you do 16 have the legal ability to recommend anything more 17 restrictive or lower , even estate or ag . IS Frankly , we would like the 19 estate zoning rather than agricultural . 20 Mrs . Welles is a young lady of 88 and she has no 21 plans on developing the property during her 22 lifetime . 23 Louie Thurow during some of the 24 other hearings that went on in the city takes Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 22 1 great pride in saying that her forebearers were 2 the first white settlers in Kendall County , 3 Illinois , so she would prefer not to see the 4 property develop , but we don ' t know generations 5 down the road , so we think locking it in as 6 estate zoning helps you as a city for future 7 growth out there , sets a tone for nice , big lots 8 if it ever is developed , but we have no intention 9 of doing that for a good long time . 10 So that ' s our comments , and we 11 would ask for a positive recommendation as to 12 estate zoning . 13 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . Is there 14 anyone here that wishes to ask questions ? 15 MR . HOLDIMAN : I ' ve got just a point 16 of clarification . Dan , on the different maps 17 that we received , the one that you have displayed IS up there shows the corner of the property going 19 right up to Route 71 ; this colored map right here 20 does not show that same thing . 21 MR . MILLER : I can speak to that . 22 The colored maps were prepared by staff and 23 they ' re not correct . That ' s correct . If you 24 note , it says approximate location . Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 23 1 MR . HOLDIMAN : Put an X maybe ? 2 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : We ' ll take that 3 more up in detail when we are out of public 4 hearing . 5 MR . KRAMER : Nicely done , 6 Mr . Miller . 7 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : There is 8 apparently no one else that wishes to speak for 9 this one , so I ' ll ask - - 10 MR . CROUCH : Move to close the 11 public hearing . 12 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Is there a 13 second ? 14 MS . ADAMS : Second . 15 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : All in favor ? 16 ( A Chorus of Ayes ) 17 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Nay ? 18 ( No response ) 19 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : We are out of 20 public hearing . 21 ( Which were all the 22 proceedings had in 23 public hearing . ) 24 - - - 000 - - - Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 24 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS' ) SS : 2 COUNTY OF LASALLE ) 3 4 I , Christine M . Vitosh , a Certified 5 Shorthand Reporter , do hereby certify that I 6 reported in shorthand the proceedings had at the 7 hearing of the above - entitled cause and that the 8 foregoing Report of Proceedings , is a true , 9 correct , and complete transcript of my shorthand 10 notes so taken at the time and place aforesaid . 11 I further certify that I am neither 12 counsel for nor related to counsel for any of the 13 parties to this suit , nor am I in any way related 14 to any of the parties to this suit , nor am I in 15 any way interested in the outcome thereof . 16 I further certify that my 17 certificate annexed hereto applies to the 18 original transcript and copies thereof , signed 19 and certified under my hand only . I assume no 20 responsibility for the accuracy of any reproduced 21 copies not made under my control or direction . 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 25 1 In testimony whereof , I have 2 he eu to set my hand this __- 7 L --- day of 3 77 -� _- , A . D . , 2007 . 4 lam/ /am ' 5 6 Christine M . Vitosh , CSR 7 CSR No . 084 - 002883 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 Plan Commission October 10, 2007 26 $7,000 5: 24, 5:24 add 12 :22 back 5: 13, 15: 19 6: 13, 6: 17, 8:5, 12:81 oOo--- 23:24 additional 5: 22 , 13: 3 background 5 :6 12: 18, 13:24, 15 : 12, 084-002883 25:7 address 19:20 BAKER 2 :8, 16: 10, 20:4, 20: 11 , 20: 11 , 1107A 19:20 adjacent 13: 15 16: 10, 18: 19, 19:6 20: 15, 20:24, 21 : 13, 14 3: 19 aforesaid 24: 11 based 20:23 21 :24 , 22:6 14th 4: 11 afterwards 8:9 beautiful 12: 12 CLARENCE 2:4 16 11 :23 ag 21 : 9, 21 : 17 behalf 7:23, 17:8 clarification 22: 16 2007 4: 11 agreeable 12 :7 Behind 8 :23 classification 20:8 2007-2 4: 13 agreement 20: 9 Betty 3: 17 clearly 6:23 2007-3 3: 17, 16:23, agricultural 21 : 19 big 8:8, 22:7 client 7:7 19 :4 agriculturally 20:23 bike 7:9, 7: 12, 8: 1 , close 15: 19, 16: 81 2007, 25: 3 Alarm 16:24 8:3, 13 : 17, 14: 1 , 18: 16, 23: 10 30 11 :22 already 11 : 21 , 12:21 , 14: 10, 14: 19 colored 22: 19, 22:22 300 10:20 12:241 18 :9 bit 6: 15, 17: 16, 20:2 , comments 6: 19, 402 8 :23 ANNE 2:2 21 :3 18: 12, 22: 10 47 17:23 annex 5: 14, 5:23, Bridge 17: 14, 17:22 , Commission 1 :3, 5.7 5: 16, 6: 10 20: 7 19:21 4: 18, 5:8, 7:4, 8:21 , 6 5: 24 annexation 4:23, Bruell 12:22 11 :5, 13: 12, 14: 16, 60560 19:21 5: 12, 5: 15, 5: 18, 6:6, build 5: 19, 9: 11 , 15:5, 17: 12, 19: 18, 7 5:24, 20:22 6: 11 , 6: 16, 15: 101 11 : 16 20: 18 7122: 19 15: 137 20: 9 , 20: 13 buildable 11 : 18 committee 15:20 711 17: 14117:22 annexed 20: 3, 24: 18 building 6:9 Community 20:24, 765 11 :22 answer 8: 13 , 8: 14 buildings 6:8 21 :6 7:00 1 : 11 , 1 : 11 answers 10:21 Business 17: 19, complete 24: 10 800 1 : 11 Anthony 4: 13 18:6 , 18:7, 18: 8 completed 12:6 88 21 :20 apparently 23 : 8 buyers 11 :9 concern 14:22 98 15 :7 Apple 18:4 conclusion 13: 1 applies 24: 18 connect 13: 19 appropriate 21 : 11 < C > consider 21 :8 < A > approved 20: 14 C.S.R. 1 : 10 continue 3:21 , 3:23 abandon 13:4 approximate 22:24 call 16:6 continued 3: 19, ability 21 : 16 approximately 6: 10, cart 20:2 3: 19, 4: 10 able 6: 11 10:20 categories 21 :7 control 24:22 above-entitled 1 :9, area 12:7, 12:21 , cause 24:8 conversations 6 :4 24 : 8 18:21 20:21 certificate 24: 18 copies 4:22, 24: 19, access 9:9, 9: 11 , assume 24:20 Certified 24: 5, 24:20 24:22 9: 13, 9: 15, 9: 16, attorney 19:22 certify 24:6 , 24: 123 corner 22: 18 9: 18, 9: 18, 12:20 automatically 20:7 24: 17 Correct 17:24, 18:9, accomplish 6: 11 available 12 :21 change 9: 17 22:23, 22:23, 24: 10 accuracy 24:21 away 10:20 changing 17: 18 cost 5:23, 6:6 acre 6: 1 , 6:6, 11 : 11 aye 3:6, 4:4, 16: 15, CHARLES 2:6 costly 6:2 acreage 15: 8 19: 9 Chorus 3:7 , 4:5, Council 5: 12, 20 : 5, acres 5: 16, 6: 1 , 6: 10 Ayes 3:7, 4:51 16: 16 , 16: 16, 17:4, 19: 10, 20: 15, 21 : 13 across 10: 15 17:4, 19: 10, 23: 16 23: 16 counsel 24: 13, actually 6: 11 , 9:71 Christine 1 : 10 , 24:5, 24: 13 20:3, 20: 18, 21 :7 25:6 COUNTY 22 :2, 24:3 ADAMS 2 : 5 , 3:4, < B > Circle 12: 15 couple 4:22 23 : 14 B3 18:7 City 1 :4, 1 : 12, 5: 13, course 6:7 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 Plan Commission October 10, 2007 27 covered 12: 11 8:22, 10:2 , 10: 9, 20:20 7: 17 CROUCH 2:7, 3:24, 10: 14110:23 far 5: 11 , 9:20 Griesman 11 : 3, 11 :6 , 17 : 1 , 19:5, 19:7, due 16:4 Farm 1 : 11 11 :7 23: 10 duly 4: 17, 7: 31 8:207 favor 3:6, 3: 8, 4:37 growth 22:7 CSR 25 :6, 25:7 11 :4, 13: 11 , 14: 15, 4:6, 7:20, 13: 17, guys 4:21 currently 3: 11 15:4 , 17: 11 , 19: 17 13:24, 14:2, 14:61 curves 10: 12 dumpster 8:24, 9:61 14:9, 16: 14, 16: 17 , 9: 20, 10: 1 , 10:8 17:3, 17: 5, 19: 9, < H > during 21 :21 , 21 :23 19: 11 , 23: 15 half 5:7 < D > feel 11 : 9, 14:20, hand 3: 14, 24:20, Dan 22: 16 21 : 10 25:2 Daniel 19: 16, 19:20 < E > feet 10:20 happened 5: 11 day 25:2 easement 6: 13 , filed 20: 19 happens 14: 8 deal 15:24 7: 10 , 11 :22 , 11 :237 fine 16:7 happy 5: 14, 7: 14, default 5: 19, 20: 81 13: 22, 14: 5, 14: 19 first 3: 16, 4: 17, 7: 3 , 7: 16 20: 17, 20: 19, 21 :2, easements 11 : 10, 8:20, 11 :4, 13: 111 heading 14:5 21 : 5 11 :21 , 12:2 , 13: 3 14: 15, 15:4, 17: 11 , heard 7:8, 9: 12 dense 21 :8, 21 : 15 East 5: 17, 9:23, 19: 17, 22:2 hearing 3:2, 3: 12, describe 18: 1 9:24, 10:4, 13: 153 five 6: 1 , 11 : 10 3: 17, 15: 19, 16:9, detail 23: 3 14:5 floodplain 11 :20 16:23, 18: 17, 19: 14, develop 22:4 Eastern 10:7, 10: 18, follows 4: 18 , 7:4, 20: 12, 20: 17 , 23:4, developed 22:8 10: 19 8:21 , 11 :5, 13: 12, 23: 111 23:20, 24: 8 developer 20: 10 edge 10: 17 14: 16, 15:5, 17: 12, hearing. 23:23 developers 11 : 13, either 7: 14, 9:6 19: 18 hearings 4: 13 , 8: 10, 11 : 15 end 9:24, 10:4, foot 11 :22, 11 :222 8: 11 , 15:24, 21 :24 developing 21 :21 10: 13, 11 :24 11 :23 Heartland 12: 15, Development 14:8, enough 14:21 , 14:23 forebearers 22: 1 13:20 21 : 1 Entertain 15:22, foregoing 24:9 HEGELER 2:9 different 9: 11 , 9: 133 16: 8, 16:22 , 18: 16, Frankly 20:21 , 21 : 18 helps 22:6 22: 16 19: 3 Frick 14: 14, 14: 17, hereby 24:6 direction 24:22 estate 21 : 9, 21 : 10, 14: 17 hereto 24: 18 directly 7:7 21 : 147 21 : 17, 21 : 19, front 20: 18 hereunto 25:2 Director 21 : 1 22:6, 22: 12 full 11 : 14 high 14:21 , 14:22 discuss 15:20 Estates 5: 17, 7:6 future 12: 3, 14:7, history 21 :4 discussion 8: 8, evening 19: 19, 20:4 15: 10, 22:6 HOLDIMAN 2 :4, 3: 3 , 16:20, 18: 16, 19: 1 everybody 18:2 4:2, 4:24, 5:3, 7: 17, discussions 6: 12, evidently 13 :24 15:23, 16:4, 16: 13, 20:24 Exactly 7:21 < G > 17:2 , 18: 18, 22: 15, displayed 22: 17 excuse 13 : 15 Game 1 : 11 23: 1 District 18 :6, 18 :7 exists 11 :23, 12:24 garbage 8:24, 9:5 Hollenbeck 20:22 divide 12:2 expect 11 :9 gave 21 : 12 home 11 : 17, 12: 12 doing 22: 9 expense 12:23 generations 22:4 homeowners 12: 16 done 9:2, 23: 5 extra 15:21 getting 13:22 hook 5:23 down 6:7, 10: 12, give 5:5, 11 : 10 hope 13: 1 , 20: 13 10: 12, 10: 16, 22: 5 grant 13:3 horse 20:2 Drive 8:24 < F > Great 8: 16, 8: 17, hour 1 : 11 driveway 9:4, 9: 9 facts 8: 9 10:24, 22: 1 house 5:20, 6:9, DUDA 8: 19, 8:22, Family 11 : 16, 12: 13, Gregg 4: 16, 4:24, 8:23 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 Plan Commission October 10, 2007 28 houses 9: 1 , 9: 14 13: 5 13: 14, 14: 14, 14: 17 note 22:24 Lane 5: 17, 9:8, mile 5:7 notes 24: 11 10: 12, 13:21 , 13:23; Miller 2: 10, 5:9, nothing 14: 1 < 1 > 14: 3, 15:7, 15: 12 22:21 , 23:6 November 3: 19, 4 : 11 idea 13: 18, 14:7 large 11 : 19, 12: 12 month 3:20 number 16: 5 ILLINOIS 1 :4, 1 : 12, LASALLE 24: 3 motion 3: 1 , 3:20, 19:21 , 19:23, 22: 3, last 3:20, 20 :4, 20: 15 3:22, 16:8, 16:23, 24: 1 law 19:22 18: 16, 19:4 < O > improvement 12:5 left 12: 10 Move 3:2, 4: 10, 9: 5, O'BRIEN 16:24, in. 9: 15 legal 21 : 16 9:21 , 9:22, 10:4, 17:8, 17: 10, 17: 13, INGEMUNSON 4: 16, length 16: 3 10: 10, 23: 10 17: 14, 17: 18, 17:22, 4: 19, 4:21 , 5: 1 , 5:5, less 21 :8 Moved 3:3, 3:5, 3:24, 17:24, 18: 3, 18:9, 5: 10 , 7: 13, 7:21 , 8 :2, licensed 19:22 16: 102 17: 1 , 18: 18, 18: 13 9: 16 , 9:24, 10: 3, lifetime 21 :22 19:5, 19:6 Okay 3:21 , 4: 1 , 4: 9, 10:7 , 10: 11 , 10: 15, light 8 : 5 moving 9: 15 5: 1 , 5: 13, 6: 18, 7: 5 , 10: 19 limit 6:5 MS 2:27 2:5, 2: 11 , 8: 16, 8: 17, 10: 9, intense 21 : 15 LINDBLOM 2:3 3:4, 7:5, 7: 19, 7:24, 10: 14, 10:24, 15: 18, intention 22 : 8 line 12:4, 12 :7 8:4, 8: 16 , 8:22, 10:2, 16:4, 18: 5, 18: 15, interested 7: 10, little 5:6, 6: 15, 10:9, 10: 14, 10:23, 19: 8, 22: 13 24: 16 10: 16, 17: 16, 21 : 3 23: 14 once 13: 17, 13:23, issue 6:24, 15:24 live 6:23, 7:6, 8:23, 16:3 issued 6:8 9: 10, 14: 18 One 4:23, 5: 19, 5:22 , issues 6: 13 located 12:7, 17:21 < N > 6: 5, 6: 9 , 11 : 16, item 4: 12 location 5:4, 22:24 name 6:22 , 8:22, 13: 13, 15:24, 18:23, locking 22:5 11 :6, 13:7, 13: 141 22: 17, 23:8 long 21 : 14, 22: 9 14: 17, 15:6, 19: 19 One-family 18:6 < J > looking 6: 1 , 10:41 narrow 13:21 open 16:23 J. 19: 16, 19:20 15: 13 Nay 3:9, 4:7, 16: 18, operate 18:8 JEFF 2:8 lot 13: 16, 20:5 23: 17 opposed 12:5, Jensen 3: 17 lots 22:7 Need 3: 1 , 3:20, 13:7, 12: 14, 12: 17 John 2:9, 15:3, 15:6 Louie 21 :23 20: 17 ordinance 20: 13 Johnson 8:23 love 7:24, 8:2 needs 12:4, 12:6 original 24: 19 Julie 7:2 , 7: 5 lower 21 : 17 negatives 7: 18 outcome 24: 16 neighbors 7:7, 8 : 11 own 13 : 14, 15:7 8:3 owner 20:6, 20: 10 < K > < M > neither 24: 12 owners 11 : 8 keep 6:6 M. 1 : 10, 24:5, 25:6 newest 5:2 Ken 11 : 3, 11 :6 major 14:22, 14:22 next 4: 12, 7:7, 12 : 16 Kendall 22:2 map 22: 19 nice 22:7 < P > KRAMER 19: 16, maps 22: 16, 22:22 Nicely 23:5 p.m. 1 : 11 19: 19, 19:20, 23 : 5 MARLYS 2: 11 Nicole 4: 13 parties 24: 14, 24: 15 KRAUPNER 2 :6, matter 1 : 9, 19:24 night 20: 15 path 7: 9, 7: 12, 8: 11 18:20 mean 15: 12 No. 5: 9, 18: 13, 25:7 8:3, 9:7, 13: 17, MEETING 1 :3, 1 :8, nor 24: 13, 24: 14, 13: 18, 14: 1 , 14: 10, 4: 11 , 20 :5 24: 15 14: 19 < L > MICHAEL 2:7 North 13: 19, 17: 141 pathway 11 : 14, lady 21 :20 microphone 6:22 17:22 12 : 14, 12: 16, 12: 18, land 11 : 8 , 12: 10, Mike 4: 1 , 13: 10, northerly 11 :24 13:4 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 Plan Commission October 10, 2007 29 pay 14:20 properties 14: 18, received 22 : 17 sanitary 12:4, 12:6 PC 3: 17, 4: 13 , 16:23, 15: 11 , 15: 14 recommend 21 : 16 satisfied 21 : 12 19:4 property 6: 8, 10: 5, recommendation saying 22: 1 peaceful 12: 11 10:20 , 11 : 11 , 11 : 197 6: 16, 21 : 132 22 : 11 says 22:24 people 7:22, 9:4, 11 :21 , 12 :2 , 12 : 15 , recommended 5: 12 secluded 12: 11 9: 10, 9: 15, 9: 18, 16: 5 12: 19, 13: 15, 13:23, reconsider 13:2 Second 3:4, 4:27 perfect 12: 11 14:6, 15:7, 17: 213 record 16:21 , 19:2 13: 13, 16: 12 , 16: 13, perfectly 21 : 11 20:4, 20:6 , 20:7, related 24: 13, 24: 14 17:2, 18: 19, 19:71 perhaps 21 : 1 21 : 11 , 21 :21 , 22:4, remain 9: 17 23: 13, 23: 14 permits 6: 8 22: 18 remaining 15: 11 , seconded 3:6 petition 20: 19 proposed 12: 16 15: 14 section 10: 16, 11 : 19 petitioner 3: 18 protest 7: 12 , 7: 16 Report 1 : 8, 24:9 seems 12:22 phonetic 11 :7 provided 12:4 reported 24:7 seen 20:5 picture 18:2 public 3:2, 3: 12, Reporter 24:6 Service 18:7 pieces 12: 9 3: 16, 4: 12 , 6: 19, represent 19:23 set 25:2 place 12: 12 , 24: 11 8: 10, 8: 11 , 15: 191 reproduced 24:21 sets 22:7 Plan 1 :3, 4: 18, 5: 8, 15:24, 16: 8, 16:23, request 6: 10, 6: 15 settlers 22:2 5: 11 , 7:4, 8:21 , 11 : 5 , 18: 17, 18:21 , 19: 13, requested 3: 18 sewer 5:24, 12:4, 13: 12, 14: 16, 15: 5 , 20: 12 , 20: 17, 23: 3, requesting 5: 15, 12:6, 14:4 17: 12, 19: 18, 20: 18 23: 11 , 23 :20 , 23:23 5: 18 shed 8: 5 planning 8:6 publish 21 : 14 requiring 11 : 14, 13:2 Shorthand 24:6 , plans 13:4, 21 :21 Put 11 : 14, 12: 12, residential 17: 19 24:7, 24: 10 plat 4:22, 4:23, 5:3 23: 1 residents 14:2 show 22:20 please 3: 13 Response 3: 10, 4:81 shows 5:4, 22: 18 Pohlweg 13: 10, 15: 17, 16: 19, 17:6, side 10:8, 10: 8, 13: 13, 13: 14 < Q > 18:24, 19: 12, 23: 18 10: 18, 10: 19, 11 :23, poin 6: 15 quarter 11 : 11 responsibility 24:21 13: 16, 18:4 point 8: 12, 15:21 , question 6:24, restrictive 21 :6, sidewalks 12:21 22: 15 10:22, 13: 16 , 15:9, 21 :8, 21 : 17 signed 20: 13, 24: 19 POLHILL 7:2, 7: 5, 15: 14 review 5:7 simply 14: 19, 20: 11 7:6, 7: 19, 7:24, 8:4, questions 7: 8, 8: 13, rezoned 11 : 8 Single 20:20 8: 16 8: 14115:21 , 22: 14 rezoning 13: 16, 15:8 small 11 : 10 portion 11 : 18 quiet 12: 10 river 9: 1 , 9: 10, 9: 14, someday 14:8 position 13:2 Quincy 5: 16, 8:241 9: 19, 11 :20 , 12 : 19 sometime 12:3 positive 6: 16, 7: 18, 9:8, 13 :23, 14: 3, 15:7 riverside 12:21 Somonauk 18:3 7: 19, 22: 11 Road 1 : 11 , 18:4, sorry 13: 14 possibility 7: 11 20:22, 20:22, 22:5 South 19:20 possible 7: 9 < R > Roesch 15:3 , 15 :61 southern 11 : 19 potential 14: 5, 14:7 R1 5: 19, 20:20, 21 :5, 15:6 speaking 17:7 practice 19:22 21 : 15 Roger 3: 17 special 20: 10, 20: 11 prefer 22: 3 R2 18:6 Route 20 :22, 22: 19 spoken 5:21 prepared 22 :22 raise 3: 14, 12 : 12 rumors 9: 12 SS 24:2 present 11 :8 Ralph 6:4 staff 22:22 pretty 18: 14, 21 :4 rather 6:2, 21 : 19 stand 3: 13 pride 22: 1 real 13:22 < S > STATE 6:22, 6:23, problem 15: 8 really 5: 18, 8: 81 Safe 12:20 19:22 , 24: 1 Proceedings 1 : 8, 14:21 Samantha 8: 19, 8:22 status 15: 11 23:22, 24:7, 24:9 reason 5:22 SANDRA 2 :5 statutory 21 :4 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 Plan Commission October 10, 2007 30 Street 8:23, 10:9, 7:6 10: 16, 12:22 , 19:21 work 12:5 subdivision 11 : 13, , - < U > ' works 7:20 11 : 15, 12: 17, 13:20, unanimously 20: 14 written 20:9 13: 23 understand 11 : 13, suit 24: 14, 24: 15 12:3 sworn 3: 15, 4: 17, UNITED 1 :4 < Y > 7:3 , 8:20, 11 :4, unnecessary 12:22 YBSD 6:6 13: 11 , 14: 15, 15:4, years 20:6 17: 11 , 19: 17 Yorkville 1 :4, 1 : 121 System 16:24 < V > 4: 18, 7:4, 8:21 , 11 : 5, verbally 13:8 12: 10, 13: 12 , 14: 16, version 5:2 15:5, 15: 13, 17: 12, < T > Virginia 19:4, 19:23 19: 18, 19:21 , 20:4 talked 6: 14 Vitosh 1 : 10 , 24:5, YOUNG 2: 11 , 21 :20 taxes 14:21 , 14:22 25:6 taxpayers 12:23 voice 6:20 technically 9:3 < Z > testified 4: 17, 7:31 ZANGLER 4: 14, 8:20111 :4 , 13: 11 , < W > 9:22, 10:6, 10: 18 14: 15, 15A 17: 11 , Walker 20:22 Zanglers 11 : 12, 19: 17 wants 5: 14, 18:23, 11 : 15, 12:8, 13:3 testimony 25: 1 20: 10, 20: 11 zone 21 : 13 thereof 24: 16, 24: 19 water 14:4 zoning 5: 19, 17: 19, THOMAS 16:24, Welles 19:4, 19:23, 20: 8, 20: 16, 20: 17 , 16:24, 17:8, 17: 10 21 :20 20:20, 21 :2, 21 :6, three 11 : 11 west 14: 18, 18:4 21 :9, 21 : 10, 21 : 14, Thurow 21 :23 westerly 11 :22 21 : 19, 22:6, 22: 12 tie 13: 19 western 10: 8, 10: 17 today 20: 14 whatever 15:22 together 8: 9 whereof 25: 1 < Dates > Tom 2:3, 17: 13 WHEREUPON 4: 15, october 10, 2007 tone 22:7 7: 1 , 8: 18, 11 :2, 13: 91 1 : 10, 1 : 10, 1 : 10 tonight 20: 1 14: 13, 15 :2, 17: 9, Tony 10:5 19: 15 topography 4:23 white 22:2 towards 15: 13 wife 11 :7 transcript 24: 101 will 4:9, 4: 10, 5: 14, 24: 19 6:7, 6: 14, 9: 3, 9: 18, Travis 2: 10, 5:8, 12:2, 13:2 , 15: 19 5:21 , 6:3 , 6: 14 willing 20:7 Tree 12: 11 , 18:4 wishes 22: 14, 23: 8 true 24:9 without 8: 1 , 8:3, try 6:5, 8:9 20: 12 trying 9:21 , 9:22, Witnesses 3: 15 17 : 16 wondering 7: 11 , 8:4, Tuma 9: 11 , 9: 13 9:2 two 7: 17, 11 :21 , 21 :7 Woodworth 5: 17, Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983-0030 D C'r o United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 o /r ~ Telephone: 630-553-4350 .� Fax: 630-553 -7575 PC # APPLICATION & PETITION ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST Development Name: Pobol Date of Submission: Requesting: X Annexation $ Zoning [] Planned Unit Development [] Special Use: 1 . Name ofPetitioner(s): Stanley Pobol & Diane Pobol Address: 9225 Lisbon Road , Yorkville , IL 60560 Phone Number: ( 312 ) 501 -0508 Fax Number: Email Address: pdpobol @yahoo . com Relationship of Petitioner(s) to subject property: )] Owner A Developer [] Contract Purchaser 2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from #1 : N / A If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein: N / A 3. a). (i). Street address and physical location of subject property: 9225 Lisbon Road , Yorkville , IL 60560 (ii). Zoning of surrounding parcels: North: South: Kendall County A- 1 Agricultural East: Kendall County A3A Agricultural West: United City of Yorkville A- 1 Agricultural b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit "A". c). Total Acreage: d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of property: 04-24- 100-004 e). Current Zoning Classification: Kendall County A- 1 Agricultural f). Zoning Classification Requested: R- 1 One Family Residence: _District g). Is this property within City limits? Yes X No, requesting annexation Page I of United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners and landowners within 500' entitled to notice of petition under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: Attach a separate list and label as Exhibit "B". 5. List all governmental entities or agencies required to receive notice under Illinois law: 6. List the Illinois Business Tax Number (IBT#) for the State of Illinois and names of businesses located on subject property to be annexed: N /A 7. Does a flood plain exist on the subject property? No 8. Do Electors reside on the subject property? yes If so, they must execute this petition to annex. (Electors as defined by Illinois Law is a resident of the parcel who is a registered voter. Legal owners of the annexing parcel must sign the petition regardless of place of residence or legal voting status.) 9. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: Daniel J . Kramer 1107A S . Bridge St . , Yorkville IL 60560 phone : 553-9500 fax : 553-5764 Attorney: Name: Daniel J . Kramer Address: _1107A S . Bridge Street , Yorkville , IL 60560 Phone Number: 553-9500 Fax Number: 553-5764 Email Address: Dkramer @Dankramerlaw . com Engineer: Name: N /A Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: Land Planner: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address: Page 2 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,7oning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 10. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies. b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to page 4 of this application to "Petitioner Route, Step 1 , Fees" and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount). c. Concept or Preliminary Site Plan: 40 sets folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope. d. One CD containing one electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application (complete with exhibits) and site plan. In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is contiguous, to the United City of Yorkville. Date: J `3n Petitione (s) Signature: (All legal property owner44a,, n this application.) Subscribed and sworn to before me this _� _ day of V tAt G, 200 " OFFlCIAt. SEAL " r�Pe Le '� CIO L rSTAVE.sc�nl� NOTARY PUBLIC, STKTE 1 ILLINOIS MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 0/ZO/x007 THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. F Page 3 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING OR SPECIAL USE REQUEST PETITIONER ROUTE Step 1 : Petitioner must submit a completed application, fees` and all pertinent materials to the Deputy Clerk a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. Petitioner is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, etc., to allow timely review by City. *Fees: a. Annexation or Annexation and Rezoning - $250 plus $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres b. Rezoning only - $200 plus $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres c. Special Use - $250 plus $10 per acre for each acre over 5 acres d. Engineering Review Fees - 1 .25% of the approved engineer's estimate of cost of all land improvements, to be determined by City Engineer. e. Planned Unit Development fee - $500 f. Engineering Review Deposit - up to 1 acre = $1 ,000: over 1 acre but not over 10 = $2,500 over 10 acres, but not over 40 = $5,000 over 40 acres, but not over 100 = $10,000 over 100 acres = $20,000 g. Deposit for Outside Consultants - under 2 acres = $ 1 ,000 2 to 10 acres = $2,500 over 10 acres = $5,000 Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). Should Owner/Developer not pay these fees directly, they will be responsible for reimbursing the United City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs. Note: You must present your plan at each of the meetings below as indicated. Step 2: Plan Council: The Plan Council meets the 2nd and 4" Thursday of the month at 9:30 a.m. in the City Administration Office. Upon recommendation by the Plan Council, you will move forward to the Plan Commission Meeting. Attendees to this meeting include: City Administrator, Community Development Director, Sanitary District Director, City Engineer, Building Department Official, Emergency Medical Rep, Public Works Director, Director of Parks and Recreation, Fire Department Rep, and Police Chief. Step 3: Park Board Planning Meeting: The Park Board makes recommendations on any Park Sites included in residential developments. The Park Board Planning Meeting is the fourth Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Riverfront Building, 301 E. Hydraulic Street, Step 4: Plan Commission: The Plan Commission meets the second Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, The Plan Commission will make a recommendation for the City Council's consideration. The Plan Commission consists of 10 members appointed by the Mayor, the City Attorney and City Land Planner. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Annexation Agreement and/or Rezoning request or Special Use request. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record and certified mail by the Petitioner to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject property no less than fifteen days and no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing date. A certified affidavit must be filed by the petitioner with the City Clerk's office containing the names, addresses and permanent parcel numbers of all parties that were notified. Page 4 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoniag,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 Step 5 - only required for annexation agreements or PUD agreements: City Council public hearing: The City Council meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Annexation Agreement and/or Planned Unit Development Agreement. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record. A certified mailing to surrounding landowners is not required for this public hearing. Any annexation agreement, PUD agreement or development agreement must be signed by the Petitioner prior to being voted on by the City Council. Step 6: Economic Development Committee and Committee of the Whole: The Economic Development Committee and Committee of the Whole meets the third Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Committee of the Whole where no formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings. Step 7: City Council: The City Council meets the fourth Tuesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. This is where all City Council voting takes place. Agreement: I understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred Administrative and Planning Consultant Fees which must be current before this project c proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return this original (retaining a copy for your reco s) to he D y lark, U ited City of Yorkville, 800 ame Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. Date 730 9A Signature etitionej 1 %I Z 1 Page 5 of 5 United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL ONE: THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH O1 DEGREES, 35 MINUTES, 34 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER 1333 .0 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES, 24 MINUTES, 26 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 353 .09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES, 35 MINUTES, 34 SECONDS EAST 547.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES, 35 MINUTES, 34 SECONDS WEST, 353 .31 FEET TO SAID WEST LINE; THENCE NORTH O1 DEGREES, 35 MINUTES, 34 SECONDS WEST, 535 .00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN FOX TOWNSHIP, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL TWO: EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS CREATED BY WARRANTY DEED DATED JULY 235 2981 AND RECORDED JULY 27, 1981 AS DOCUMENT 81 -2855 . GRANTED BY HOWARD W. GORE ALSO KNOWN AS H.W. GORE TO NORMAN C. WATKINS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THAT PART OF PARCEL ONE DESCRIBED AS PARCEL ONE IN SAID DOCUMENT NUMBER 81 - 2855 OVER A STRIP OF LAND 1 ROD WIDE BEING THE SOUTH 16.50 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 1320.0 FEET OF THE EASTERLY 3135 .0 OF THE NORTH /2 SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN AND ALSO A STRIP OF LAND 25.0 FEET IN WIDTH EXTENDING FROM SAID 1 ROD STRIP TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT, AND LYING TO THE LEFT OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 1 ROD STRIP THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES, 30 MINUTES, 0 SECONDS WEST 650.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES, 00 MINUTES, 0 SECONDS WEST 1000.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 DEGREES, 52 MINUTES, 02 SECONDS WEST 163 .05 FEET TO SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE TERMINUS OF SAID LINE IN THE TOWNSHIP OF FOX, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS . PLAT OF SURVEY � PARCEL ONE THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 240 TOWNSHIP 36 NORTH, RANGE S £AST OF THE THIRD PRNOpAL MERCIAN. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER: THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES .35 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF 5410 NORTHWEST QUARTER 13330 FEET FOR THE POW] OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 66 DEGREES: 24 AONUTES 26 SECDNOS FAST ALONG SW NORTH LINE: .353.09 FEET, THENCE SOUGH DI DEGREES, 35 MINUTES 34 SECONDS EAST 547133 FEET,' THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 35 MINUTES, 34 SECONDS WEST 3S3.3T FEET TO SAID WEST TINE; THENCE NORTH Of DEGREES, 35 MINUTES,: 34 SECONDS WEST, 535.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGRff9NG, N FOX TOWNSHIP, KENpAL. COUNTY, ILLINOIS. - E PARCEL i1Y0: .FASEMFM FOR. INGRESS AND EGRESS CREATEO 'BY WARRANTY DEED GATED JULY 23, 1981 AND. REGORGED JULY 22, 1981 AS DOCUMEiR 81-2855 To GRANTED BY HOWARD W. GORE ALSO KNOWN AS H: W GORE TO NORMAN C. WATKINS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THAT.PART OF PARCEL ONE DESCRIBED AS PARCEL ONE IN' SAID DOCUMENT NUMBER 81-2855 OVER A STRIP OF LAND 1 ROD WIDE BEING THE SOUTH I6.5O FEET OF THE NORMOILY 1=0 FEET OF THE E4l..LY 31359 FEET:OF THE NORTH 1/2 SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 36. NORTH, RANGE. 6 FAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MEPJDM NID ASO A STRIP OF L ND 250 FEET IN WiDDTH u EMENDING FROM SAD I ROD STRIP TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT, AND LYING 70 THE LEFT OF TIE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINT,BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAD I ROD STRIP THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES, 30 MINUTES, O SECONDS WEST 65OA FEET; THENCE NORTH 90 DEGREES, 00 MINUTES, D SECONDS WEST 6000.0 FEET, THENCE SOIAH 54 DEGREES. 52 MINUTES, O2 SECONDS WEST 16305 FEET TO SAO EASTERLY LINE. OF THE TERMINUS :. Su OF SAID LINE IN THE TOWNSHIP OF FOX KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS.`. 8 � wwr m amw.c n.: Alf ONE of MONIAL ` f.� .. �.Jam N� ... 353. 09 T_ iwa.w . iewsNU 11f $ pEMEPIT , 21054 " '. .+r IN �T flu r •nTS I B � I i Cf T ]IY 15'�yO4+ I MCCC S / l/ 6INN GF44EL I � �P I IV/ ARE rNC£ f f CINYEL CRAM NIA NOW 1 '. ✓!Anti wocO two � AJB F 147.75 ORAYk". gNKI 11 _ 44 I "Ov SN4O e, M rC " M NEME RMOONCL .SL yM Xff No Wi5 :off . I fOiG. Iff. Y 1 t Mi i m it Ef CQ 61 I Zt tlf ,t ! ].qy FftE F£NLE y :Ntjs - SNEP (I I I ;N�t .. N.41.+/]Nr4'f0N N.BS'J33R' r II 4 5 arra INFO F T RAC T Of 0' PrOpedy vfD Et" ;u; oN'v:R No. Fa C Je nc ^a^_• off 51 OF F11NMS CCVNN OF KENWL. y $L4MlLA } i tX15 6 lU CEIYIttY 1W SUW"Y: O 5 IAK SVRJEfE➢ ROE PROPKaY 0 ' ME ANNEKD PIAT 4 A C IRECT FUlfE "t W :. \ y e l M'M G mfUll . "InVOIS AND O'HU_ iJRVEY. THIS YRNFES^ON> 3FKY T.: 4J uCfi.^VEMEMS LOCATED Ai SOitMN ON iX. ( X lN CURRENT VERNON SIMI A J .F J „a.TY E l\ 1: AWOGN , AD. 3ON6. OM1£N UNDER Mt NAND O SEAL G UNO iL '6` �� �'�• MJOW RPS URI MY OP uaac z II � '" ({ ' o ,> >^,20l " t TEDT PMR M NEED ON GINANNE PDt f` s2 C'IOr, r wv ON SINl II PA. I MM AD NCS Y�mEti s- ^'AIS to ♦ LFS ' S'W CR art eAS—1 IN mnae uNC ""' . 329 WHITE Pihe Cl.. O V eGC UIS' 60513 I� =!asE Cguvuo-. AU.rrNr �fnr xne Axo rtEVov 4. PASDiT IXSCFf9AY[!ES ° ° G1p1i pHThNC f6aC� 554 FA) r� 551 -1 7 I �`��eat7 Clpd United City of Yorkville Memo 0 lz� o ^ 800 Game Farm Road EST. -� 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553 -8545 "� p Fax: 630-553-3436 <LE Date: November 2, 2007 To: Plan Commission From: Travis Miller, Community Development Director Cc: Annette Williams, Administrative Assistant (for distribution) Subject: PC2007-36 Pobol Property Zoning Review Backeround This property consists of approximately 4.5 acres and is accessed via a private lane off of Lisbon Road. The Annexation Plat is attached for reference. City Council approved the annexation of this property on October 9, 2007. Zoning Ordinance 10-4-5 requires all land annexed into the City be classified as R- 1 Residential. Although, the petitioner is not requesting a re-zoning from this classification, 10-4-5 does require the Plan Commission to conduct a public hearing and make findings and recommendations with respect to the appropriate zoning classification or classifications of the annexed land and transmit to the Mayor and City Council. Comprehensive Plan Recommendations: The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan recommends Transitional Neighborhood for the area this property is within. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan recommends Office/Research/Industrial north of the subject property based upon the planned Prairie Parkway alignment and future intersection with Route 71 . The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan recommends Estate Neighborhood The property to the west was annexed to the City in September 2006 and rezoned to A- 1 . Staff Comments: 1 . The existing use of the property is most similar to the uses permitted in the Estate Residential District. 1 2. Estate District and Residential R- 1 District zoning classification of the property are both appropriate zoning which would allow for the continuation of the existing use of the property and be consistent with the future land uses recommended by the Comprehensive Land Use Map. 3. In the event a development plan is proposed for this property in the future, the zoning classification may need to be evaluated based on the proposed plan regardless of the zoning classification recommended at this time. Findings Necessary for a Zoning Amendment shall be based on the following: a. Existing uses of property within the general area of the property in question. b. The zoning classification of property within the general area of the property in question. c. The suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the existing zoning classification. d. The trend of development, if any, in the general area of the property in question, including changes, if any, which have taken place since the day the property in question was placed in its present zoning classification. e. The impact that such reclassification and/or annexation will have upon traffic and traffic conditions on said routes; the effect, if any, such reclassification and/or annexation would have upon existing accesses to said routes; and the impact of additional accesses as requested by the petitioner upon traffic and traffic conditions and flow on said routes. (Ord. 1976-43, 11 -4-76) 2 I t MOM" I a LV � � 1 r I .11 Po b I Pr P ty I I i I t I a° `� nRw ennJXwn ennlPJnv wmua nuns Yusrw4NeJ a laTln nln/ I_-.__I eeln+L xelexeexxaoY Ii+a.I M.EY �ndK�o IPYMn.n ATEJ 141Y ` n..u.NYYU ��� arecuusrvxr uEA Y ORN000 I] ]AN4 114, _ 10 H111 0.Al 4E ! 0 .AA Y WUNI4810NBORN000 MA .fY _� ® R.WIIOYPL PEgXBOP11000 IqJ .OY (� xbON80RNWOPEINI la] .fY - COYYFACYL %fA I.IY - NNUn1P4L laA JY � elwce]eaeJPCxnxousmlu au xn f� Lgmuuloxouv as .x — uxwfex wuJ IJIO. XJY �� exuaxq POms - - (�'.�-I HgPOSFO NQlU4 .IX-1101PF MKIGK:I..VWXTd!•ElS - mrr�*uel�E. n Ia.EY !•nJr.g4.InAM•nm rmll.rmlfl•mnm5 nrr vrm..•a IIUT(4NINIAfUI'F Mlr.)u•aw..;Jr•; u�� tY4.m r ITTiEX AI'NLLI 11./�Wx Ill�M1x4..x.J.`� L�.n�Y+Px�aw.wnwlws -� The Game City Of Yorkville 'f.`.....•......».NsaEiEYr-r mrte•_I. 600 Garne Farm Rd. COMPRE&-0EIV80VE PIUW neopla:reawry zz.zoos Yorkville,IL 60560 UNWED CrFY OF` ORKVILLE 630-553-4350 IwNrnS .Xnmw.a Nn.rm•.emm+•.m.o n•..a x.aY..ve...e +H411emmp. IM Ina W"n.ea.pul n rt.�Mnml my lgrWer Yan'I Plmnx9pmtlwT Pobol Property — Aerial/Context Exhibit T Rod d North Star Hammary Prop y r.. Welles Property i United CI of Yorkville GIS The Data fa provided without warranty or any representation of w a City accuracy.Da Isspness,or without warran It Is the represe tatio of the Parcel Data and Aerial Photography "Requester"to determine accuracy,timeliness,completeness,and Provided By Kendall County GIS appropriateness of Its use.The United City of Yorkvl Re makes no wananttes,expressed or implied,to the use of the Date. Pobol Property — Existing Zoning Exhibit i. +—_7 r North Star Harriman rop y — — i _ Pobol ro Welles Property I i — 1 r L= The Date Is provided without warranty or any representation of wx United City of Yorkville Gl$ accuracy,timeliness,or completeness.h Is the responsibility of the Parcel Data and Aerial Photograp"y 'Requester'to determine accuracy,timeliness,completeness,and Provided By Kendall County r. appropriateness of Its use.The United City of Yorkville makes no s warranties,expressed or implied,to the ese of the Data. United City of Yorkville County Seat oF Kendall County 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois, 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 it $ f Fax : 630-553-7575 r� Website: www.yorkville.il . us PC # APPLICATION & PETITION TO AMEND ANNEXATION or PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT Development Name: jfl�r kY��r-rT LV C0x � Date of Submission: 1�j ' C? 1 1 . Name Of Petitioner(s): Address: jGX 314 [ n0 �r> 1 � Phone Number: Fax Number: Relationship of Petitioner(s) to subject property: Owner � Developer a Contract Purchaser 2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from #1 : _ If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest therein : 3. a). Street address and physical location of subject property: � cCi Gtcr'. c+ --V t, c+/ ) r'Pic:,v'l"C f'x r7 ck rr r'7 b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit "A". c). Total Acreage: d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of property: Sc (t_ cxt ,C,4 e- Ci e). Current Zoning Classification: L ct,ci q zc+ r, ' , 13 f). Zoning Classification Requested if changing zoning: 4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners entitled to notice of petition under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute: (Please attach a separate list as Exhibit `B".) 5. Date of Annexation or PUD Agreement sought to be amended: _ Y ) c V ( 23 C.0 c Name of Agreement: c Date of Recording: Attach a true and correct copy of agreement as Exhibit "C". Page 1 of 1 —Application and Petition to Amend Annexation or Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement 6. State the items to be amended from the existing annexation or PUD agreement. J� e CA'f+-Ck 7. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number and fax number of person to whom inquiries regarding this p tition may be directed: �Niries regarding alp" n rn C`b : cox �✓` '—� i fit, t � ct i-r 3 � i —T' L. is C> Attorney: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Engineer: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: Land Planner: Name: Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: 8. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies. b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to page 4 of this application 'Petitioner Route, Step 1 , Fees and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount). c. Site Plan (if necessary) : 40 sets folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is contiguous to the United City of Yorkville. Date: ���� /, 7 Petitioner(s) Signature: (All legal property owners of record signatures must appear on this application.) )) � Subscribed and sworn to before me this <"7i � day of ` � , 200? Notary Seal THIS APPLICATION MUST SE NOTARIZED. and Petition to Amend Annexation or Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement L06TF M SANI MUPPO Y PUBIC OF 111RM eOm: 12-11-07 AMENDMENTTO ANNEXATION OR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AGREEMENT PETITIONER ROUTE Step 1 : Petitioner must submit a completed application, fees' and all pertinent materials to the Deputy Clerk a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. Petitioner is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, etc., to allow timely review by City. 'Fees: 1 . a. Annexation/PUD Amendment - $500 b. Deposit for Outside Consultants - under 2 acres = $1 ,000 2 to 10 acres = $2,500 over 10 acres = $55000 Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). Should Owner/Developer not pay these fees directly, they will be responsible for reimbursing the United City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs. Note: You must present your plan at each of the meetings below as indicated. Step 2: City Council: The City Council meets the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. A Public Hearing will be held at this time for the Amendment to Annexation/PUD Agreement. Notice will be given by publication by the United City of Yorkville in the Kendall County Record at least 15 days but no more than 30 days prior to the public hearing date. Step 3: Economic Development Committee: The Economic Development Committee meets the third Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Conference Room. The Economic Development Committee consists of three (plus one alternate) City Council members. Before this amendment can move forward to Committee of the Whole, a "draft' Amendment to Annexation or PUD Agreement must be written. Step 4: Committee of the Whole : The Committee of the Whole meets the first and third Tuesdays of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Committee of the Whole where no formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings and for review of the draft amended agreement. Step 5: City Council for vote on the amended agreement. Any amendment to an annexation agreement, PUD agreement or development agreement must be signed by the Petitioner prior to being voted on by the City Council. Agreement: I understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred Administrative and Planning Consultant Fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return this original (retaining a copy for your records) to the Deputy Clerk, United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. Signature of Petitioner Page 3 of 3—Application and Petition to Amend Annexation or Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement 6. State the items to be amended from the existing annexation or PUD agreement. Front Yard Setback We request that the front yard setback be amended from 30' to 25' for lots zoned R-4. This would move the house forward 5', allowing more room in the rear yard. This issue was brought to our attention with a ranch style home that we are currently constructing. Certain floor plans, such as ranch floor plans or a first-floor master floor plan, are deeper than the traditional two story floor plan. These deeper floor plans then take up more of the space in the rear yard, due to the current front yard setback. By allowing the 25' front yard setback, the house will sit on the lot with better balance. Currently, the front yard is too large, and the back yard is small and confining when using the deeper floor plans. A 25 ' front yard setback will allow vehicles to be parked in the driveway without impeding the sidewalk. In addition, this amendment will not affect any public utilities. Lot Coverage Ratio It is also requested that the Lot Coverage Ratio be changed on R-4 lots from 30% to 40%. This is due to the construction of ranch style home plans and first floor master plans, on the smaller sized lots. The foot-print of these plans require more area on the lot than a two-story plan requires. It has always been our intent to primarily construct ranch plans or first floor master bedroom plans on these lots to meet the market's needs. We did not consider the need to request this variance at the time of the annexation agreement. However, we recently submitted a building permit in which this issue was brought to our attention. It has been our mission for the R-4 lots (Villa lots at Blackberry Woods) to provide a good sized home, without compromising on room size, to be targeted toward families wanting to downsize from their current home and stay within the Yorkville community. Over the past 15 years of business, we have come to understand what size a room needs to be in order to be functional while not being cramped. Therefore, in order to build a home with all rooms being an adequate size, we are requesting this variance. PARCEL 1 DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH , RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29 PER MONUMENT RECORD 76-5255; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST (BEARINGS ASSUMED FOR DESCRIPTION PURPOSES ONLY) , 3389.57 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF PNA YOUTH CAMP PER PLAT OF SURVEY PREPARED BY JAMES M . OLSON ASSOCIATES, LTD. , DATED 6-10-96 (NO. 5512-A) TO A POINT AT THE FENCE NOW MONUMENTING THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY ONCE OWNED BY T. SPENCER (SAID SOUTH LINE BEING COINCIDENT WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF PROPERTY CONVEYED PER DOCUMENT 896707); THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, 2. 19 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING IN THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, 2056.92 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF CIMARRON RIDGE SUBDIVISION AND CIMARRON RIDGE-TWO SUBDIVISION TO A FENCE LINE; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 521 .27 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE; THENCE SOUTH 05 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, 170. 51 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE; THENCE SOUTH 14 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST, 427.66 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE; THENCE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST, 102.40 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE EXTENDED WESTERLY OF LOT 4 IN CONOVER'S THIRD SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 86 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, 99. 32 FEET ALONG SAID EXTENDED SOUTH LINE TO THE CENTER LINE OF BLACKBERRY CREEK; THENCE SOUTH 30 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST, 48.00 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE; THENCE SOUTH 09 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST, 15.30 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 2054.73 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST, 502.04 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 29; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 22 SECONDS WEST, 739.40 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN THE CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PARCEL 2 DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH , RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : COMMENCING AT A FOUND STONE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 30, A DISTANCE OF 2650.43 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 10 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 502.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 2.48 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, 1241 .43 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, 2. 19 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID EAST LINE, SAID POINT BEING 739.40 FEET NORTHERLY OF SAID EAST QUARTER CORNER; THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 18 MINUTES 22 SECONDS EAST, 739.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN THE CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS . AND BOTH PARCELS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; CONSOLIDATED DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 29, AND PART OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH , RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29 PER MONUMENT RECORD 76-5255; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST (BEARINGS ASSUMED FOR DESCRIPTION PURPOSES ONLY), 3389. 57 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF PNA YOUTH CAMP PER PLAT OF SURVEY PREPARED BY JAMES M. OLSON ASSOCIATES, LTD. , DATED 6-10-96 (NO. 5512-A) TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY CONVEYED PER DOCUMENT 896707; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 52 SECONDS EAST, 2059. 11 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PROPERTY PER DOCUMENT 896707 AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF CIMARRON RIDGE SUBDIVISION AND CIMARRON RIDGE-TWO SUBDIVISION TO A FENCE LINE; THENCE SOUTH 12 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, 521 .27 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE; THENCE SOUTH 05 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST, 170. 51 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE; THENCE SOUTH 14 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST, 427.66 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE; THENCE SOUTH 20 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST, 102.40 FEET ALONG SAID FENCE LINE TO THE SOUTH LINE EXTENDED WESTERLY OF LOT 4 IN CONOVER'S THIRD SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 86 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, 99. 32 FEET ALONG SAID EXTENDED SOUTH LINE TO THE CENTER LINE OF BLACKBERRY CREEK; THENCE SOUTH 30 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST, 48.00 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE; THENCE SOUTH 09 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 52 SECONDS WEST, 15. 30 FEET ALONG SAID CENTER LINE; THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 41 SECONDS WEST, 2057.21 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF PNA YOUTH CAMP , AFORESAID; THENCE NORTH 01 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, 1241 .43 FEET ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING , ALL IN THE CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 06 / 12/ 2007 03 : 01 PM I( entlalI GoUrlty 2; E BLACKBERRY WOOLS Underlying Number 0249.300-009 No Remainder PARCEL NUM= LOT NUMBF,B 02-29-133-001 1 02-29-133-002 2 0249-133-003 3 02 49433404 4 02-29433-005 5 02.29433-006 6 02-29-133-007 7 0229 133-008 8 02-29.133409 9 02-29-133-010 10 02.29433-011 11 0249-133-012 12 02-29-132-00$ 13 02-29-132-007 14 02-29-132-006 is 02-29-132-005 16 02-29432.004 17 02-29-132-003 18 02-29-132.002 19 0249422-018 20 02-29-122-019 21 02-29-122-020 22 02-29-122-021 23 02-29-133-013 24 02-29-326-001 25 02-29-326-002 26 0249.326-003 27 02.29.326.004 28 02.29.326-005 29 02-29.326-006 30 0249427-004 31 02-29-327-003 32 02-29-327-002 33 02-29-327-001 34 02-29-304=004 35 02-29-304-003 36 02-29-304-002 37 0229-304-001 38 02-29-328.001 39 02-29-328.004 40 02-29-328.003 41 06- 12-2007 13 : 49 MCCUE BLDRS HEARTLAND 6305533636 PAGE2 02-29-328-002 43 02-29-123-017 02-29-123-0'16 44 02-29-123-015 45 02.29423-014 46 02-29-123-013 47 020294123-012 48 02-29-123-011 49 02-29-123-010 50 02-29-123-009 51 02-29-123-008 52 02-29-123-007 53 02-29-123-006 54 02-29-123-005 55 02.29- 123-004 56 0249423-003 57 02-29.123-002 58 02-29.123.001 59 02-29-123-030 60 02-29-123-029 61 0249423-028 62 0249423-027 63 02-29-123-026 64 02-29-123-025 65 0229-123-024 66 02-29-123-023 67 02.29-123-022 68 02-29-123-021 69 02-29-123-020 70 02-29-123-019 71 02-29-123-018 72 02-29-302-001 73 02-29-301-012 74 02-29-301-013 75 02-29-125-012 76 02.29425-011 77 02-29125-010 78 02-29-125-009 79 02-29-125-008 80 02.29425.007 81 02-29-125-006 82 02-29- 125-005 83 02-29-125-004 84 02-29-125-003 85 02-29- 125402 86 02-29-125-001 87 06- 12-2007 13 : 44 MCCLJE 6LDR5 HERRTLRND 63 05533636 PRGE3 iCcc� K7 � rr" Gc' .° c � 02129.301 -001 88 0249.301 -002 89 02-29-301-003 90 0249.301-004 91 02-29-301-005 92 V2.29.301-VV6 9.1 02-29-301-007 94 02.29.301.008 95 0229.301.009 96 02-29-301-010 97 02-29-301-011 98 02-29-303414 99 02-29-303-013 100 02.29.303.012 101 02-29.303-011 102 02-29.303-010 103 02-29-303.009 104 02-29-303-008 105 02-29-303-007 106 020290303.006 107 0229-303.005 108 02-29-303-004 109 02-29-303-003 110 02-29-303-002 111 02-29-303-001 112 02-29-124.003 113 02-29-124-002 114 02.29.124-001 115 02-29-122-001 116 02-29-122-002 117 02-29- 122-003 118 02-29.122=004 119 02-29-122-005 120 0229422406 121 0229m 122-007 122 02-29-122-008 123 02-29- 122-009 124 02-29-122-010 125 02-29-122-011 126 0249422012 127 02-29-122-013 128 02-29-122-014 129 02-29-122-015 130 02-29-122-016 131 02-29-122-017 132 02-29-132-001 133(sto=) 06- 12-2007 13 : 49 MCCUE BLDRS HEARTLAND 6305533636 PAGE4 BLACKBERf 04.8 10. 0' .d ` 7 . ' ®7 . 7 .0' 70.0' 0. 0 78.3 9 .3 �� 1546 1916 0 13,76' 1 15 A �122x123124° 2 ° 22 ° 2 ° 130131e 132121 °120 N 4 ry 690- 70.0 10.9 70.0' 25 320 0 N 6jOZ - ..O u e9sNy� aw - S � #' .5.3 J ';r yp.Mi-v �:. . ,.axw4 Y 4-w_- Y '_yi . � T.,> ...�.. n;. a. .,'. .... u' .. q 4•C*^_. ya k6,Cyf J>-4 ?[:i-y!, 1' a f�'wt.,f - �Y%i ,�^`.z=s'Y3"`� v"� w'S. T �}� 5 ,.., L � : cs€z;Yy f2a ay .y,? `F a• "x.140 0 WP ti x; 6 z " "..,a� , 119 M C L . G F '_�,.�ff,., _x�.a.�?-. . +.. z ,r�✓.?� � s"' ,��. .. +s t. .;,,, 4 a2 . ' "sa ° �'<+<'� `Zap'-' "._ - - -uu"i,.,;�:: �: .� �'', : j-x:i:t�vE 3 - �.� .'i,.:,".-: .5 .0, 0.0' 70.0 t 70.0, ,c;;. ":t ,��,�'' �> �.X�s O ` ;k s,. 'a �a�s''z:,t e r. . . .O s �t� Ia'3Y`, * ` -3 i'•' n 69 95.5 . , . .-" Y ��'..�'�" � .�'e�Q. ., x z x , '�v .a , .ri��- �-•,� s �����;.y,- .,�- ; , , 1 .9 ✓o,' • . . ' , � � � .. .p, ��,,:• x. 22 � �. rs;. �� � ��c ��1 sF7 - ..�aaz- ;:., 1 ��, �;'`� rn �, q a o o w 118 N 56 55 0 54 53 52 51 ¢ 57 yy LO LO LO LO LO L 50 a R 3 d r '+ s 3P 3 � eea7 1' O 5H o O _` � 20.0 t Oy h1.x34. 69.0 t 695 70.0 70.0 70.0 s. XV 117 700 o. 70.0 88.3' � 120.4' �j r+Mj Dv o0 ;-,.- c� :. M O .. i °. a � r,�` yr ' > :c' ? O � s" 8 ' •yi�-mr' rQ1 x, sr Nom'- r ., r5c a 60 N 61 N62 N' 63 N64 65 M 66 of 59 116 i 9 r , Y 67 � ,47�'R+Y� 95.0 9 ' 95.9 82. 70. 70. 700' 7 18 '45.1 �7yr X-c y Q + y 1 n f a PURGE 68 LL DRIVE « `?9 w � ' . x , t � 4 h?• � A � _;err � aF! � �`' �- O � �F, y�3 Q 955.0' 9 <>�93 95.0' 70.0 701y 70. 7U-TUr < 45 r,;. *' f �sx-'° $1+$ •I" , , �sShf .L� .v . 9 115 85 0 84 0 83 0 82 0 81 ' 80 0 79 a 4 o LO `J+ wo " wo w0. W .N. N O• 120.0' r •� O .. WO 78 � � 70 44. s O O U . 86 o o.o' 7 70. 0 - . 7007 WO ,.�oQ 114 ` y o LO "" y0d Q 1L�' 120.0' " ?J„ 71 120.0 V 7 WO , A M 113 2 76 L� ; r., M . � g .:;. o y d a'> z_H mom' t�2• 'I 120.0' '�.- � � � LO �`sa. ° 112 S LO ffi � V . . ° WO 120.0' � a LO 1 Q 82 1A 120.0' r r w£�'` wo , 74 k lid 120.2' O, = m 119.1' ry _ �y °Q ° 41 110 6.0 76.0' 84.8' Di G4 -` 133. 39" 6 Q y�P to y 910 92 93 94 95 0 0 ' �8� 96 ° 97 98 0 4p 28 � 109 ,� wo wo wo wo wo wo w 38 o 134.9' 770' 7 0' 760' 7 0 7601 504 226 9 1127 ` 728 608' 37TH 1;- s108 . _. . Y�.aA nn. 669' 373 . :_ . wo SOUTH CARLY CIR LE' �� CARLY COURT x w w , 107 � 1Q5 iO4 ° 1031Q2 ° 101 100 ° 99 15Q6` 34 $ 33 32 31 WO t, . 106 ^� WO' d- ^� , ,-• , . w• - wo wo wo �. wo wo wo Lo 35, y e ° 0 30 . o ;. � , 77.3' 137.0 . 85.0' 89.0 89:0' _ 89.0' 89.0' 89.0' 89.3 ,.,, 2345 168.3 85.0' 85.0' 100.0' ; 130.0' A McCUE BUILDERS DEVELOPMENT KEY: ❑ = VIELLA ❑ = ESTATES WO = Walkout Basement LO = Lookout Basement i� /�*Sitemap a nd landscaping is an artist's rendering and is not to sca el- ability, dimensions and prices are subject to change without notice. 2 Equal Housing Opportunity. United City of Yorkville Memo " 800 Game Farm Road E6P. 1 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-8545 0 1� ^� Fax: 630-553-3436 ea <LE % Date: November 5, 2007 To: Plan Commission From : Travis Miller, Community Development Director Cc: Annette Williams, Administrative Assistant (for distribution) Subject: PC2007-37 Blackberry Woods PUD Amendment Request Background: The Planned Unit Development agreement for this property was approved July 12, 2005 and recorded May 18, 2006. This agreement provided the property with PUD zoning with both R-2 and R-4 provisions. Exhibit "E" of the agreement lists the Zoning Ordinance variations granted as part of this PUD (Attachment l of this report) as approved in 2005 . The petitioner is requesting to amend Exhibit "E" to include (Attachment 2 of this report explains each request): A Front Yard Setback of 25 ' in the R-4 District. The R-4 requirement is 30' . 5 ' variation. A Lot Coverage Ratio of 40% in the R-4 District. The R-4 requirement is 30%. 10% variation. Staff Comments: The R-4 Zoning District area includes Lots 50-132 of the Blackberry Woods PUD (Attachment 3 of this report). Front Yard Set Back Request Staff verified there are no utilities or infrastructure concerns with the dwelling units being 5 ' closer to the street right-of-way in this development. Staff recommends requiring a minimum 30' Rear Yard Setback in the R-4 area (removing item 4 from Exhibit "E") to provide wider rear yard areas. The Petitioner stated at the Plan Council Review a willingness to maintain a minimum 30' Rear Yard Setback for the R-4 units. 1 Lot Ratio Increase Request Staff recommends requiring a minimum of 50% of the units in the R-4 area include a covered porch in return for the increased footprint size. This architectural element will ensure a varied streetscape environment and reduce the risk of monotony of building masses which may be increased with larger building envelopes and the reduced setback also requested. The Petitioner stated at the Plan Council Review a willingness to commit to this requirement. 2 ATTACHMENT VaMff "E" LIST OF VARIATIONS 1 . Lot sizes in the R-4 District may be less than the 9,000 square feet minimum, but shall be at least 8, 160 square feet. 2. Lot widths in the R-4 District may be less than the 70 feet minimum, but shall be at least 65 feet. 31 Side yards in the R-4 District may be less than the 10 feet minimum, but shall be at least 7 feet. i 4. Rear yards in the R-4 District may be less than the 30 feet minimum, but shall be at least 25 feet. 5, Side yards in the R-2 District may be less than the 10 feet minimum, but shall be at least 9 feet. i 6. Block length of North Carly Circle may be more than the 1320 feet maximum, and shall be approximately 1,600 feet. 7. Length between streets may be less than the minimum of 400 #I and shall be at I least 300 feet. i j i j 39 ATTACHMENT 5. State the items to be amended from the existing annexation or PUD agreement. Front Yard Setback We request that the front yard setback be amended from 30' to 25 ' for lots zoned R-4. This would move the house forward 5', allowing more room in the rear yard. This issue was brought to our attention with a ranch style home that we are currently constructing. Certain floor plans, such as ranch floor plans or a first-floor master floor plan, are deeper than the traditional two story floor plan. These deeper floor plans then take up more of the space in the rear yard, due to the current front yard setback. By allowing the 25' front yard setback, the house will sit on the lot with better balance. Currently, the front yard is too large, and the back yard is small and confining when using the deeper floor plans. A 25 ' front yard setback will allow vehicles to be parked in the driveway without impeding the sidewalk. In addition, this amendment will not affect any public utilities. Lot Coverage Ratio It is also requested that the Lot Coverage Ratio be changed on R-4 lots from 30% to 40%. This is due to the construction of ranch style home plans and first floor master plans, on the smaller sized lots. The foot-print of these plans require more area on the lot than a two-story plan requires. It has always been our intent to primarily construct ranch plans or first floor master bedroom plans on these lots to meet the market's needs. We did not consider the need to request this variance at the time of the annexation agreement. However, we recently submitted a building permit in which this issue was brought to our attention. It has been our mission for the R-4 lots (Villa lots at Blackberry Woods) to provide a good sized home, without compromising on room size, to be targeted toward families wanting to downsize from their current home and stay within the Yorkville community. Over the past 15 years of business, we have come to understand what size a room needs to be in order to be functional while not being cramped. Therefore, in order to build a home with all rooms being an adequate size, we are requesting this variance. B AC a KB F R W/ WOODS ATTACHMENT a 121' 122 123 124 125`126 a127�1285129a130 131 132 J.6 b\ 15 120 - - - S.i 20 ° o a^' >YO. >. nao ]na oa U lar Alp mn 3,r32 wv LOM1VO � 16 Zi„ 2 114 GLE ;; - .'ro w0 ip� 13 3n Mfr. 118 _ S7 �°56 °55 a S4 53 52 51 SO s_ '. wo — to Lo Io to Iv t.o to �'- e ; 58 117 " ,a ry; nn ,na tna ron Eo >" a Ql E�O a' T : 4, �J ! � a � 19 Z' V3M - „ i' 60 k61 62 63 `64 65 O a g 116 59 _ 66 ro SPACE - aa + aYV au LO �''� nn to m +nu ] r aa'asl 67 4. / , 1 a PURCEL DRIVE `r!�' j 'r 46 'f' ati - , r12 7 x 115 85 d 84 A 83 82 81 80 ; 74 69 X45 r� ey y H J ei 114 !9 V 7 ' Q lO 7 7 24 9 113 2 } [ 112 V o WO P 75 73, GP sn 25 89 u c° 42 IA . Ar. ,yF 111 ' r WO wz Q �� ° 27 7w. X4.1 a 110 P µo .J a 769 109 9w - 9w3 G 9 - 9W7 a n 9 o 92 G L8 o o w - 3 v i 28 e wo SOU7'II CARLY (:IR LE 0�. CARIY COURT !'�°v 24 _ - „ 36 a si v e: , 5�� 107 11104 e e c G ISO&' qa wo 1 1 5 - 103 102 101 100 9Q T 34 a 33 Q 32 31 a 30 35 Q n.� 37V es.a e9.0 89.0 Ws "a K..6 ass' 2s y + leas' ssc' ss.a eoo.a ,so.a A MCCLIE BUILDERS DEVELOPMENT KEY: ❑ = VILLAS ❑ = ESTATES WO =Walkout Basement LO = Lookout Basement •Siremap and landscaping is an anises ren&nng and is no[m uaie. Ent avarla6ilig,dimertsiorm and pncu are subject Io change utlthon[noa¢. Q Eq=I Housing Opponunily. Memorandum To: Plan Commission esr. 1 '; yeas From: Travis Miller 10 [F -� CC: Annette Williams (for distribution) Date: November 1 , 2007 Subject: Montgomery Boundary Agreement LE Background Staff has met on several occasions with the Village of Montgomery staff beginning in July 2007 to discuss and draft a Boundary Agreement between the two jurisdictions for consideration of each Municipality. City Council reviewed a draft boundary agreement October 9, 2007 and requested the review and input of the Plan Commission prior to taking final action on the agreement. Attached is the draft agreement along with all exhibits for your review. A Public Hearing has been scheduled for the November 14, 2007 Plan Commission meeting regarding this agreement. Action Staff recommends, following the Public Hearing, the Plan Commission formulate a recommendation in the form of a motion including any modifications the Plan Commission deems appropriate for the Boundary Agreement to be adopted. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY AND THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the day of , 2007, by and between the VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY, Kane and Kendall Counties, Illinois, a political subdivision organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois ("Montgomery"), and the UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, Kendall County, Illinois, a political subdivision organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois ("Yorkville") (collectively referred to as the "Parties"): RECITALS WHEREAS, a portion of unincorporated Kane and Kendall Counties between Yorkville, and Montgomery, is a rapidly growing area in Illinois; and WHEREAS, developments under way or in various stages of planning are creating unusual growth opportunities between Yorkville and Montgomery; and WHEREAS, Yorkville and Montgomery realize that current plans and opportunities for development will be accompanied by significantly higher demands for transportation, police, utility, and other municipal services and financial commitments to meet the necessities of such services; and WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Illinois 1970, Article VII, Local Government, Section 10, provides for intergovernmental cooperation in and authorizes units of local government to obtain or share services to exercise, combine or transfer powers or functions in any manner not proscribed by law or ordinance, and authorized units of local government to use their credit, revenues and other resources to pay costs related to intergovernmental activities; and WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act provides for the joint exercise of powers, privileges or authority by units of government and provides for intergovernmental contracts; and WHEREAS, Section 11 - 12-9 of the Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11 - 12-9) provides for the adoption of agreements establishing the boundaries for jurisdiction between municipalities in accordance with the provisions stated therein; and WHEREAS, Yorkville and Montgomery recognize the need and desirability to provide for logical municipal boundaries and areas of municipal authority between their respective municipalities in order to plan effectively and efficiently for the growth and potential development between their communities and the conservation of the available resources for all of their respective citizens; and 1 WHEREAS, Yorkville and Montgomery after each publishing and holding all public hearings required by law, have authorized, by ordinance, the execution of this agreement, as an exercise of their respective authority and as an exercise of their intergovernmental cooperation authority under the Constitution of Illinois; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations recited herein it is agreed between Yorkville and Montgomery, as follows: 1 . That the boundary line between the two municipalities for the unincorporated area lying between them, for annexation and municipal government planning, subdivision control, official map, ordinances, and other municipal purposes shall be as shown on Exhibit A. attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, and approximately described as follows: A BOUNDARY LINE RUNNING THROUGH THAT PART OF SECTIONS 1 , 25 3149 5, 6, % 10 AND I I IN TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CURRENT CENTERLINE OF GALENA ROAD AND THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ORCHARD ROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 9; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE AND THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 4 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF U.S. ROUTE 30; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF ILLINOIS ROUTE 47; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF BASELINE ROAD TO THE EAST LINE OF ASHE ROAD FOR A POINT OF TERMINUS OF SAID LINE. 2. Except as otherwise provided herein, Montgomery shall have jurisdiction with respect to property lying easterly and northerly of the above-described boundary line, and Yorkville shall have jurisdiction of the property lying westerly and southerly of the above-described boundary line. On or after the date of this Agreement, neither party shall annex territory which lies within the jurisdiction of the other municipality as established by such boundary line, nor shall it exercise or attempt to exercise or enforce any zoning, subdivision control, official map, or other municipal authority or ordinance. This boundary line shall not require a municipality to exercise control over the property on that municipality' s side of the boundary line, and shall not prohibit such municipality from negotiating additional boundary line agreements with other municipalities that may surrender such jurisdiction to another municipality (e.g. Montgomery may agree to cede jurisdiction to some property on the northerly and easterly side of the boundary line to Sugar Grove or Aurora and Yorkville may agree to cede jurisdiction to some property on the southerly and westerly side of the boundary line to Plano, without doing so being deemed a violation or inconsistent with this agreement.). Neither municipality shall object to the other municipality's request for an amendment of any facilities planning area in respect to land located on the requesting municipality' s side of the boundary line. 3 . To apply consistent development standards for the area depicted by Exhibit B as follows: a. Residential Standards 2 i. Single-Family Detached Residential Unit: 1 . Materials a. Primary structures shall be constructed upon either a basement or foundation — `slab' construction shall not be permitted. 2. Design a. No units shall be similar in appearance unless two or more buildings of dissimilar design separate the units. b. All newly installed utility services shall be underground. ii. Multi-Family Attached Residential Unit: 1 . Reserved 2. Design a. Surface parking areas shall be treated with decorative elements, building wall extensions, plantings, berms or other innovative means. b. The height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and adjoining buildings. c. All newly installed utility services shall be underground. d. Common open space and pedestrian features/amenities, such as covered walkways, street furniture, and bicycle rack facilities are to be encouraged. iii. Density t . If a developer participates in the Raymond Regional Basin provided for in Section 8 hereof, the maximum gross density shall be four (4) units per acre, or an appropriate density agreed upon by the Parties during the design review period. 2. If a developer does not participate in the Raymond Regional Basin provided for in Section 8 hereof, the maximum gross density shall be 2.25 units per acre, or an appropriate density agreed upon by the Parties during the design review period b. Non-Residential/Commercial 1 . Materials Premium siding materials (brick, stone, cultured stone, split face brick, architectural block, natural wood siding, Fiber cement siding, synthetic stucco) or Pre-Cast shall be incorporated on at least 50% of the total building. 2.Design a. Use of windows or the impression of windows on all sides of the building are to be encouraged. b. Buildings on outlots shall incorporate the style, materials, and/or design elements of the main building. 3 c. Surface parking areas shall be treated with decorative elements, building wall extensions, plantings, berms or other innovative means. d. The height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and adjoining buildings. e. All newly installed utility services shall be underground. f. Common open space and pedestrian features/amenities, such as covered walkways, street furniture, and bicycle rack facilities are to be encouraged. g. Trash enclosures shall be located in areas that are easily accessible by service vehicles, but minimally exposed to the public street. Screening these enclosures with a material that is compatible with the principle commercial building is required. h. Rooftop mechanics shall be screened (as viewed from ground elevation at the property line) and enclosed in a manner that masks the equipment from view from all sides and is of the same character and design as the structure. i. Ground level mechanics shall be screened by landscaping and/or fencing. In addition to the properties listed on Exhibit B, Yorkville shall make a good faith effort to amend its annexation agreement with the property owner of the property located at the corner of U.S. Route 47 and U.S. Route 30 (commonly known as the Schramm Property) to require the above standards to be applied to said property. If such an amendment is successfully achieved by Yorkville, the provisions of this paragraph shall likewise apply to the Schramm Property. 4. To allow for comment, each municipality shall promptly notify the other of any proposed or contemplated change to, including, but not limited to, proposed zoning districts, and development plans for the properties listed on Exhibit C in order to foster intergovernmental cooperation and insure the compatibility of land uses along said boundary line. The type of proposed or contemplated change will determine the comment review period as follows: a. Preliminary Subdivision Plan and Plat, and Zoning Changes Approval Review: Comment Period — allow 15 days for initial staff response acknowledging acceptance of plans for review and establishing a review schedule. This review schedule shall not exceed 60 days without the consent of the municipality with jurisdiction, otherwise no comment/recommendation will be required to be considered by the municipality with jurisdiction. 4 b. Site Plan/Development Approval Review: Comment Period — allow five days for initial staff response acknowledging acceptance of plans for review and establishing a review schedule. This review schedule shall not exceed 45 days, otherwise no comment/recommendation will be required to be considered by the municipality with jurisdiction. 5 . The Parties agree that so as to coordinate transportation related issues to adopt and comply with the following (including, to the extent legally possible, requiring all developments to comply with the following): a) If not previously adopted, Exhibit B shall be adopted as each community' s transportation and access plan for full intersection access points 1 and 2 (as depicted on Exhibit D) onto and from U .S. Route 30 between U.S. Route 47 and Dickson Road within 60 days of passage of this Agreement (said access points are subject to reasonable latitude in positioning as long as each adjacent parcel to said future roadways as shown on Exhibit B is insured access to the roadways constructed from said access point). b) Coordination (and reasonable transitions of roadway widths and designs) of road stubs in adjoining developments to insure continuation of all boundary roadways including, but not limited to, Concord Drive extending west from Montgomery. c) Require, to the extent legally possible, all developments to install and coordinate bicycle paths in accordance with Exhibit E. To the extent, that either municipality designs roadways and/or bicycle paths independent of a private developer, the municipalities shall also comply with Exhibit E. This shall include requiring a connecting bicycle path along the Com Ed power lines (which lie south of U.S. Route 30) which shall have mutually agreeable design standards, as depicted on Exhibit E. 1 , and, at a minimum, be 10 feet wide. Should the Com Ed power lines be unavailable for said route, the Parties shall utilize their best good faith efforts to agree to establish a mutually agreeable alternate route for bicycle paths. d) Each municipality shall support the widening of U.S. Routes 30 and 47 within their respective jurisdictions and shall support said widening in the other Party' s jurisdiction to the extent possible. e) U.S. Route 30 and Galena Road constitutes a shared border between the Parties and the Parties acknowledge that there are one or more intersections for roads crossing or intersecting U.S. Route 30 and Galena Road that will require improvements as properties on either or both sides of the shared border are developed. The Parties agree to require either in an annexation agreement, or to the extent legally possible for property already annexed, any developer whose development is either adjacent to and will access U.S. Route 30 or Galena Road or adjacent to one of the intersecting roads for U.S. Route 30 or Galena Road and whose primary access to either of said highways will be from 5 such intersecting road, (i) such developer to pay its Pro rata share, reimbursement and/or recapture for the actual costs of intersection improvements (including but not limited to, traffic signalization, interconnects, and transponders for emergency vehicles), to be paid to the other municipality, and (ii) such developer to pay its Pro rata share, reimbursement and/or recapture of any costs of other intersection improvements (including but not limited to, traffic signalization, interconnects, and transponders for emergency vehicles) along U.S. Route 30 which have been previously installed by or at the direction of the other municipality to be paid to the other municipality. "Pro rata share" shall be defined as 25% for each corner of a four way intersection. 6. Both Parties shall cooperate with the Yorkville Community Unit School District # 115 to attempt to locate a Middle School site consisting of 30 acres. 7. Prior to drilling, or allowing third parties to drill any new water wells within one-half mile of the above-described boundary line, the Parties agree to confer and, using generally accepted engineering principles, not locate, or permit to be located by third parties (to the extent legally possible) any wells that would materially interfere with the operations or supply of other wells within one-half mile of the above-described boundary line. The Parties shall also meet to coordinate all new wells (regardless of their non- interference with existing wells) to avoid interfering with each other' s future well and water plans within one-half mile of the above-described boundary line. The Parties shall compel developers to design and install emergency cross-connections of watermains on boundary line developments. Said cross-connections shall only be opened and utilized upon the consent of the Village Manager/City Administrator of both municipalities and only for so long a period of time as is consented to by both municipalities Village Manager /City Administrator. 8. Yorkville agrees to consider allowing, and Montgomery agrees to consider allowing the tributary developments as shown on Exhibit F to utilize the Raymond Regional Basin for storm water management. A tributary development designed to utilize the Raymond Regional Basin shall be responsible for conveyance of storm water to the basin area (provided however that adequate downstream conveyance is provided) and shall contribute funds necessary to excavate volume capacity and/or other facility appurtenances at a rate of $ 15,000.00 per acre foot of volume generated by the participating development. This rate shall be evaluated when each development is approved to participate and adjusted accordingly based on the Engineering News Record cost index. All properties being served by said basin shall be treated equally by the Parties as to rates. Should a particular development utilizing Best Management Practices avoid or reduce the need for storm water detention through the use of strategies, including but not limited to, permeable pavement, rainwater basins, and other environmentally conscious strategies, said development shall not be prohibited from using such strategies in lieu of said regional basin. Additionally, should the order of development prohibit utilization of said regional basin for any particular landowner, Montgomery shall notify the Yorkville City Administrator and following a 30 day period not be required to compel said developer to utilize said regional basin. 6 Participating developments will be required to pay a proportionate share of the maintenance costs related to the stormwater detention benefit of the Raymond Regional Facility based on the volume served by the basin. All properties being served by said basin shall be treated equally by the Parties as to said costs. The amount assessed shall be based on the actual costs of maintaining said basin (taking into account the need for appropriate reserve funds). A dormant or back-up special service area ("SSA") (including a provision for a 10% administrative fee to be retained by the Party imposing and processing said SSA) will be required to be established to ensure funds adequate to maintain the storm water basin in perpetuity are accessible to Yorkville, therefore, Montgomery and Yorkville agree to allow such provisions be incorporated into the annexation agreements for the tributary properties. 9. This Agreement shall not be construed so as to limit or adversely affect the right of either municipality to file a statutory objection to proposed zoning changes within one and one- half miles of its corporate limits as provided for by State of Illinois statutes. 10. This Agreement is not one intended to benefit a third party, and no third party beneficiary shall be deemed created hereby. This Agreement is binding only upon Yorkville and Montgomery, and their respective successors and assigns. Nothing herein shall be construed as a limitation on the right of either party with respect to its boundaries with any other municipality or unit of local government. 11 . Neither party shall either directly or indirectly seek any modification to this Agreement through court action. This Agreement may not be changed orally. All modifications to this Agreement must be in writing and must be signed by each party. 12. If any provisions of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby. 13. Both Parties acknowledge that pursuant to the current provisions of 65 ILCS 5/7- 1 - 1 , the annexation of any territory adjacent to any road or highway not already within the corporate limits of any other municipality automatically extends the boundaries of the annexing municipality to the far side of the adjacent highway. To the extent that the provisions of 65 ILCS 5/7- 1 - 1 would result in the automatic annexation of any portion of a highway lying within the other municipality's Jurisdictional Area, the provisions of this Boundary Agreement shall not bar such highway annexation, however the Parties shall file all necessary petitions and otherwise work together to disconnect any portion of a given highway from the municipality and connect said highway to the municipality with jurisdiction of the given side of the boundary line herein established. 7 14. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period of twenty (20) years from the date hereof and for such further and additional time as the Parties hereto may hereafter agree by amendment to this Agreement. 15 . This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois and shall be published by the respective municipalities and recorded or filed with appropriate County Recorders, County Clerks, and others as their interest may appear. 16. If either Municipality successfully enforces the provisions of this Agreement against the other Municipality by judicial proceedings, the prevailing party shall be reimbursed for all costs of litigation, including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs, by the losing Municipality. If litigation should be initiated by any third party challenging this Agreement, or any application thereof to any person or territory, the expenses of defending such litigation shall be shared equally by the two Municipalities. The defense of such litigation and the choice of attorneys shall be controlled by the Municipality whose annexation is being challenged or from whose territory land is to be disconnected. In the event the other Municipality desires to engage additional counsel to defend such litigation it shall be at its own expense. Venue for all litigation related to or arising out of this Agreement shall be in Kane County, Illinois. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused the execution of their duly authorized officer this day of 12007. UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE VILLAGE OF MONTGOMERY Kendall County, IL Kane & Kendall Counties, IL Mayor Village President ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk Village Clerk 8 7Feet 1,0002,000 oif bWmJL— I I I, �F J 1yl Fairfield Shetland sit C� III, F.- .0, �-1 IA$p/ o Simp oa ---- alrpT.,7 Atli 80AUUSA ��1 l _ _ VJhidawaY u �.__ MpRGP� C CALIEN F�nc�'aF Gp� w cJacob e, v ' AVALON- p4y o %race Rile, A " _ a m Q,oi'0 0 Concortl cae = i PROVIDENCE m R`G MAYFh" Galena e�� Socha 3 m Qp`q I Venetian i�- � _ . Patte7aTd � � i ( BB end Juanita m If o Highland �— o 4— me0.s N Village of Montgamery 1 Cermunfty Devebpment DeleNmM MONTGOMERY AND YORKVILLE IT.I U00 S.Proairuay BOUNDARY LINE Montgomery, EX HIBIT IBIT A mery,IL 60538. -- . -- arrpF m a e m a�� w e• ° Tar nbe s �teY 7i s E m moor Fox I z m CanpYm\�T` m 3rrnpapm a m v ■ ■f-. ■ !A. ■ __ y0 LL Kate .c E a QRIAN yT Adam jy - 0 Frances OAKM SNAMNH `� 11fly 'lronn ONT I� S N .o Q4r Tq0 Oq .7L rfaway I A 8�lleathe PROF' 02 P_ `m or Secretariat p l i- to 6 Jacob An U E o a m i 4` N AVALON a J� C0 0 ■. "ce ` Riley ASTOR SAVOY z z i -ROi-Os'O Co wd 2uGrmrmm v D PROVIDENCE G9 9�5� pAAY� Galena 75 l CVanenan: Y7 s..-.. ` z m RO aqa mm GONOO _yy � l 4untin9ton Paterson Manchester -: Q�e�'ign Stand ard Appli_ation as Fee I• L l — ■Y•�1.1--r ,'j 'r 0 800 1,600 3,200 4,800 I I. Tl Yllage of Montgomery Legend MONTGOMERY AND YORKVILLE _ community perebpment oapartmmt DESIGN STANDARD AO 'V EN BreVnay . .. EXHIBIT B laontgormryJLWo e %■ICesign Standam App Areas APPLICATION AREAS a, . (MO)essmm Gandt T�: 'a :t Z-C z ling a .0 ell eRIAIv Adam L Peters Kattos F nces O"IWONT SHAV" P—+� Troop J 'a ll Schram West ql� death:kletI WI,NI 7� VL MPPgP m= Ft r soona, q- IV Jacob Schram Peters "am U.East Kahtef AVALON a a SAVOY M> oc a X x Concord ASTOR Itat Pfym,, PROVIDENCE ;E 2 %� Gar... 4z, Bntt.IBay 0, ena 111 Veneta, E x OPP Dickson Patterson 't Noress, ao` Review Process /VA Areas ffi Ryder V� Q1 Fe . 0 800 1,600 3,200 4,800 1 j Village or Montgomery — E3�C TN ety commmity)evdomant Dmatment Legend MONTGOMERY AND YORKVILLE EXHI Mo Montgomery,IL W538 amp 12,0()S.B.&Jy Subject to Mutual Rav,ew Process REVIEW PROCESS AREAS (ao)8960080 PRAIRIE '4.=•CORNELL 9tltl m _ 6.O ROCHESTER O yecho KNELL r � Oa VFRi0y0 I � © AUCUTr E arbili Fairfield Shetland Tarnbenya' adeY nyennedy ow Fnoor z +on .�.rndeflo� z N%Sng im pson STAR � o n m A m O a7km r t L K\T c2 OV R © 30 Kate g BASELINE gRlAfy w LL .am in 3 OgKMOrvi SRAQ" ca uJ © o Tmon IEN z m` cd`I' Cvt.F $4TEi R PILLAR a 00 A whidaway O Nm Secretanat n.Jacob�pAargaret 2 Y m AmsteA AVALON Jay Barr alt Plyma Conwrtl Riley o' Of ASTOR SAVOYZ Z RO'F��O PROVIDENCE m FL OAYF' } Buchana Ti o GP�9 Galena. r c BdsblBay w t in @° m Pierpont m Venetian N a �. CONO'O�O p m O �a i t GP a Huntington Patterson i ZA G GAk ENA o Peasacola Manchester i �f ;,9 Bend Juanita x ° O i Pecos `$-Julie Cypress \o a � Ga �: Qa Feet ugh[. 0 1,050 2,100 4,200 6,300 0p Village of Montgomery ® g N Commwity[evelop tDe�artmmt O"'" MONTGOMERY AND YORKVILLE t3oo s.eroatway �-- TRANSPORTATION EXHIBIT D Nontgomery,n 60538 $� — AND ACCESS PLAN � 4 arbil/F 'Fal field Shetland JERICh'p ary v NN s w y Tmrnberry} adeY ° F xmoor O m rp 0 9 STAR Car, d. F +off mtle @ki ? ding A BASE LINE 30 I a Kate Rid { IAN m Rid .am U 3 OA/�M,NT ?HA V'L Tr on A, o /O2 9ylENOO �a oy. Whinaway m $ \o F Secretenat y °pMar ret $ 1- Aa 3 6Jacob Amste AVALON Jey Barre PI a� Riley o. �\ ASTOR SAVOV j m Rp �O e Ym a - PROVIDE'CE m.F MAYF� �F a Bucher °d p m I G,Pf9 —6a�Pa_. Oa/ena 2m m Is Venetian o mA pgO \ Pierponl 'M m y A CONO O 0 s undngton ,Patterson ti Z i a Pensacola m Manchester z K O o£ 16 Send uanila o Julie x Cypress m Foster C'Q rYiq Highland m a UGA�FNq o�uenne N YBage°s Montgomery MONTGOMERY AND YSTRIAJ LE Community Der2lopmeM bepartmert a 4SU.5 exs t o —Bike antl Pedestrian Pafis vm s Bray BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN EXHIBIT E Mon[gefnxy,IL605 PATH PLAN +° (630)B368Ap �I NOTE : THE PATH CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IDOT' S "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION . " 2 " COMPACTED BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE 6 " COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE COURSE BACKFILL DISTURBED AREA TO EDGE OF TRAIL WITH TOPSOIL AND SEED w 1 ' TYP 10 ' WIDTH x 2 % CROSS SLOPE w W 0 0 `o g ' :o ff 68 ow ' °o,00 o:p do VIEX III r = }LI W Q O d Z 1- O 61 I W O J NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR BAD SOIL AREAS PREPARED AND COMPACTED SUBGRADE M a o N n O ® N n / °o 0 N 0 F N Z O E % Englneering EXHIBIT E . 1 N Enterprises, % Inc. MONTGOMERY AND YORKVILLE ° -d COPYRIGHT 0 2007 ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC. BIKE PATH CONSTRUCTION a r z .E Car•d�o\r p m Simpson - - +C1" �ln J.ta' z NIng (j ■ass a a�� a a y-7 •gp� �is � • _ Ly-L g RIAly Ra REBE CC u: L J � Ada m J Schram Peters Kattos an Frances OgkMONT SI{gJNq O it West s, �� �L � i y. �d ,I F" qoi c ��` �'� Whirlaway U oeathE MPRGP O= q��P�DO F '4 Secretari2l<w G p`0 Schram Peters c ° o T� Jacob ✓smsia East Kahte; ,` �' �' AvALON ce o RLe ° ° x m Concord ASTUR SAVOY Z Z Rpk\�s0 PROVIDENCE G mL3�i MqV�` Ga .z Galena , I Buena � z p 'PL 9 G, Venable, �L�_ nu OHO Dickson " p3,,,rson t i fI a i I y1ti Hunb gan Of _ I1 N4anch ster 4 �r� _—� `II • &. �� C it - _ 4� I Pews x9 Julie.- I I �_CyVress Can 11 a r� ry i 2 O� a �> Gq<E�rq _ I r i ry JIB- _ u t_ ?N Ian ^•�. �F=�� 0001- at �s'I _--___ , i 1+r''• : y'>�- � 0 800 1,600 3,200 4,800 - n'I --_`_-` � �(�'�?';'�C•;y�y_`1,.`� � � � I - i va(ageernmorrtgomery Legend MONTGOMERY AND YORKYILLE -- ` Community Devebpnen[DepaRmen[ t3oos.amaasy ���POSSibleTributaryAreas RAYMOND REGIONAL BASIN °' DCFiIBITF Montgomery,IL 6033 F/ '%•'—�•" (M)aei-sm ®/ Raymontl regional Basin United City of Yorkville County Seat of Kendall County 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 Telephone : 630-553-4350 Fax : 630-553-7575 Website: www.yorkville . il . us PC # Jim APPLICATION & PETITION Please Check One: X Preliminary Plan X Final Plat Wrd S Co mrre /'`1'9I11Cowri"3. ".r q Development Name: S )4h Nddd ! \ �; It n Date of Submission: ^0 '7 1 . Name of Petitioner(s): / --Mo ✓G 2311C- Address: Ll 777 Mun e d lJri'V`f i OEo3y CIrAl f L-12: S7`/ 70? Phone Number: S°7/ D p A ' a77 Fax Number: 7/J�- P76L5-'� 6 0 2. a). Street address and physical location of subject property: 4_T rw 7 0 b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit 'W'. c). Total Acreage: 2 �7o 3S 3. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number and fax number of person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed: Attorney: Name: T nio fAy jL'— M:7Jt'0e C�)r2d✓?A P �ciaYJSP� Address: 1/ 777 �-wad' lVAP Phone Number: 7j f- ?;7K -Z776 Fax Number: 7/r-Y ?'61yw Q Engineer: Name: coIq rn� / -�a, � ;v� /�I!1 'Il Address: (p Si �j� i rl t' �(f Ivi �P /Q/: yo '/ k, 1 0± �PL C 0 f 0 Phone Number: Q0 " rr?' 73"6 0 Fax Number: Land Planner: Name: Page I of 7 United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06 Address: Phone Number: Fax Number: 4. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project. a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies. b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to Page 3 of this application "Petitioner Route, Step 1 , Fees" and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount). c. To begin the review process, the initial submittal must consist of: 1 . 12 sets of Preliminary Plans /Final plats folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope 2. 7 sets of Landscape Plans folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope 3 . 7 sets of Preliminary /Final Engineering folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope Within one week of receipt of submittal, the Engineering Department will determine if it is complete or if additional information is needed. Once the submittal is complete, the Plan Council Meeting date will be scheduled for the next meeting that is 6 weeks from this date. One week prior to your scheduled Plan Council meeting, you will be required to submit 15 full size preliminary/final site plans for the packets distributed to the members. In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct. Date: 1� - 70 "07 Petitioner(s) Signature: (All legal property owners signatures or their authorized agents (i.e. Planner, Petitioner's Attorney, Engineer) must appear on this application.) Ca Subscribed and swom to before me this �� � day of &c1ELal 22.r 2007 A(ah1 / Notary Seal t� C'd✓n il? FaMa-YUPV— THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED. Page 2 of 7 United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06 PRELIMINARY PLAN/FINAL PLAT PETITIONER ROUTE Step 1 : Petitioner must submit a completed application, fees* and all pertinent materials to the Deputy Clerk a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting. Petitioner is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, etc., to allow timely review by City. *Fees: 1 . Preliminary Plan Fee - $500/Final Plat Fee - $500 a. Engineering Review Fees - 1 .25% of the approved engineer's estimate of cost of all land improvements, to be determined by City Engineer. b. Engineering Review Deposit - up to 1 acre = $ 1,000; over 1 acre but not over 10 = $2,00 over 10 acres, but not over 40 = $5,000 over 40 acres, but not over 100 = $10,000 over 100 acres = $20,000 c. Deposit for Outside Consultants - under 2 acres = $ 1 ,000 2 to 10 acres = $2,500 over 10 acres = $5,000 Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner, zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). Should Owner/Developer not pay these fees directly, they will be responsible for reimbursing the United City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs. Note: You must present your plan at each of the meetings below as indicated. Step 2: Plan Council: The Planning Council meets the 2nd and 4th Thursday of the month at 9:30 a.m. in the City Administration Office. Upon recommendation by the Plan Council, you will move forward to the Plan Commission Meeting. Attendees to this meeting include: City Administrator, City Land Planner, Sanitary District Director, City Engineer, Building Department Official, Emergency Medical Rep, Public Works Director, Executive Director of Parks and Recreation, Fire Department Rep, and Police Chief. Step 3: For Preliminary Plans only; Park Board Planning Meeting: The Park Board makes recommendations on any Park Sites included in the development. The Park Board Planning Meeting is the fourth Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Riverfront Building, 301 E. Hydraulic Street. Step 4: Plan Commission: The Plan Commission meets the second Wednesday of each month at 7 :00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Plan Commission will make a Page 3 of 7 United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06 recommendation for the City Council's consideration. The Plan Commission consists of 10 members appointed by the Mayor, the City Attorney and City Land Planner, Step 5: Economic Development Committee: The Economic Development Committee meets the third Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Conference Room. All projects (regardless of a positive or negative EDC recommendation) proceed to the Committee of the Whole for discussion. The Economic Development Committee consists of three (plus one alternate) City Council members. Step 6: Committee of the Whole: The Committee of the Whole meets the first and third Tuesdays of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Committee of the Whole where no formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of prior committee meetings. Step 7: City Council: The City Council meets the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. This is where all City Council voting takes place. If this project has included an annexation and/or zoning petition, a Public Hearing will be held at this time with notice given by publication. Any annexation agreement, PUD agreement or development agreement must be signed by the Petitioner prior to being voted on by the City Council. Prior to the recording of the final plat, the petitioner must pay the Administration Fee. This is equal to 1 .75% of the approved engineer's estimate of construction costs of land improvements, including but not limited to all public improvements to be dedicated to the City, mass earth grading, and quasi-public improvements to be maintained by the homeowner's associations such as private storm sewer, parking areas, and trails. Step 8: Final Plat recording instructions: Once the final plat is approved by the City Council and all required documents, bonds, and letters of credit are submitted to the City, the final plat may be recorded with Kendall County. Submit the final plat mylar to the Deputy Clerk for signatures. When all City signatures are in place, the developer or his surveyor may take the mylar to the Kendall County Clerk for his signature. The next step is to have six paper prints made and return to the Kendall County Recorder' s office for recording. Kendall County requires the mylar and four paper copies. The City of Yorkville requires that you submit two recorded paper copies to the Deputy Clerk. Any copies you may require would be in addition to these. Agreement: I understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred Administrative and Planning Consultant Fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next scheduled committee meeting. Please sign and return (retaining a copy for your records) to the Deputy Clerk, United City of Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560. Page 4 of 7 United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06 Date Signari of Petitiolfer qq CHECK LIST FOR PRELIMINARY PLANS SECTION 1 : WRITTEN DOCUMENTS I . A land use application containing the following: Not Applicable Acceptable Deficient A. A statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the plan B. A time schedule of the proposed development of the area covered by such preliminary plan C. Exceptions or variations to City Zoning or Subdivision Ordinances being requested as part of the plan, including the specific section of the Ordinance. 2. A boundary survey of the area covered by such preliminary plan, prepared and certified by a registered Illinois surveyor. SECTION 2: GENERAL PLAN INFORMATION 1 . A rendered outline of the area covered by such preliminary plan drawn at a scale of not less than 1 inch equals 100 feet. 2. The plan must contain the following information: A. Scale B. North Arrow C. Original and Revised dates D. Name and address of owner of record E. Name and address of site plan designer F. Current zoning of the property G. All categories of proposed land use 3. The following information regarding contiguous property: A. Location of contiguous property B. Zoning of contiguous property C. Land use of contiguous property 4. The following site data provided in the lower right comer: A. Size of property in square feet or acres B. Square footage and percent of site coverage with buildings C. Square footage and percent of site coverage with pavement D. Number of parking spaces to be provided E. Number of parking spaces required by zoning ordinance F. Number of proposed buildings/dwelling units/lots SECTION 3 : PLAN DATA REQUIREMENTS 1 . A site location map. 2. Dimensions of the property. 3. A topographical survey of the area covered by such preliminary plan at two-foot contour intervals drawn at not less than one inch equals one hundred feet. 4. A detailed plan for the treatment of any proposed stormwater detention or retention facilities. 5. Existing or proposed public roads, streets, and alleys, including classifications, width of right-of-way and paved surfaces, and existing and proposed sidewalks. 6. Dimensioned building setbacks, and as applicable; areas for off-street parking, trucking maneuvering and service, and open space/recreational facilities. Page 5 of 7 United City of Yorkville Pre liminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06 7. A schematic of existing or proposed public utility systems, including the size of sanitary sewers, storm water lines, & streetlights. 8. Existing vegetation and plantings. 9. Any other information required by the City, to clearly show the proposed site plan elements. CHECK LIST FOR FINAL PLANS SECTION 1 : WRITTEN DOCUMENTS 1. A land use application containing the following: Not Applicable Acceptable Deficient A. A statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the plan. D. A development schedule, indicating the approximate dates for construction of the Final Plan. E. Petitioners proposed covenants, restrictions, and conditions to be established as part of the Final Plan. F. Exceptions or variations to City Zoning or Subdivision Ordinances being requested as part of the Final Plan, including the specifics of the Ordinance. SECTION 2: GENERAL PLAN INFORMATION 1 . Must be drawn to accurate engineering scale. 2. Must contain the following information: A. Scale B. North Arrow C. Original and Revised dates D. Name and address of owner of record E. Name and address of site plan designer _ 3. The following information regarding contiguous property: A. Location of contiguous property _ B. Zoning of contiguous property C. Land use of contiguous property 4. Site data to be provided in lower right hand corner: A. Legal Description B. Size of property in square feet and acres C. Current Zoning D. Square footage & percent of site coverage with buildings E. Square footage & percent of site coverage with pavement F. Square footage & percent of site coverage with landscaping G. Number of parking spaces required by zoning ordinance H. Number of parking spaces to be provided 1. Number of buildings J. Number of dwelling units K. Breakdown of dwelling unit bedroom types _ Page 6 of 7 United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06 5. Landscape data to be provided in lower left hand comer: A. Number of plantings by type B. Size ofplantings at installation C. On-center spacing for hedges (Should be 3 feet apart) D. Caliper size of all trees at installation CHECK LIST FOR FINAL PLANS CONTINUED SECTION 3: PLAN DATA REQUIREMENTS 1 . Dimensions of property. 2. Existing and proposed public and private streets, right-of-ways, driveways, all principal and accessory buildings and their uses, dimensioned building setbacks, lot sizes, sidewalks, off-street parking, service areas, open spaces, and recreation facilities. 3. Preliminary architectural plans for all residential buildings, in sufficient detail to show basic building plan. 4. The existing and proposed vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, indicating their inter-relationship and proposed treatments of points of conflict. 5. Existing and proposed utility systems, including sanitary sewers, water, electric, gas, telephone, and cable television lines, including their sizes. 6. Proposed public and private lighting systems. 7. Existing and proposed easements for utility services. 8. Proposed signage, indicating location and size. 9. Existing vegetation and plantings. 10. Proposed homing and fencing. 11 . The location and size in acres or square feet of all areas to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved as common open space, public parks, recreational areas, school sites, and similar semi-public uses. 12. Any other information necessary to clearly show the proposed site plan elements. Page 7 of 7 United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06 United City of Yorkville Memo J _ " 800 Game Farm Road ESL 1 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560 < Telephone : 630-553 -8545 09 1<i ti Fax: 630-553 -3436 O <te Date: November 5, 2007 To: Plan Commission From: Travis Miller, Community Development Director Cc: Annette Williams, Administrative Assistant (for distribution) Subject: PC2007-38 Menard's 6th Addition Preliminary and Final Plat Request Background: The proposed `6`h Addition' is a resubdivision of Menard's Commercial Commons Lot 4 which was approved May 14, 2002. Staff Comments: Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat subject to the following conditions: • Provide a note on the plat stating that Lot 1 shall not have direct access to Countryside Parkway other than via the 28 ' ingress/egress easement already noted/identified on the plat. • Provide an ingress/egress easement along the entire common lot line between Lots 1 and 2. • The property immediately east of Lot 3 is too close to McHugh Road to have its own Countryside Parkway full-access point. There are three full-access points to Countryside Parkway along the frontage of Lot 3 . These are spaced at 400-foot intervals, with the easternmost point being about 160 feet west of the east line of Lot 3 . An ingress/egress easement should be dedicated on Lot 3 from this point to the eastern lot line for the benefit of the property immediately to the east. See Attachment 1 of this report for the staff recommended easement area. • The existing 15 ' wide utility easement near the Lot 1 Countryside Parkway frontage is for a watermain extension to Menards Commercial Commons, 3rd Addition. Extend this easement to the eastern (Lot 3 side) lot line, and also widened to the north to meet the previously dedicated 10'wide utility easement. 1 Qo � IQs ATTACHMENT V E I I b m o b 0 N J � I Q N X11 61 y �J P ril GO C va F, COUNTRYSIDE CENTER qF.V C/TY UNITED CITY .1 OF YORKVILLE , IL w+ a e 1w Presentation • The Yorkville Commission frA A N I PROPERTIES , I NC. 11 . 14.07 CHARLES CONSULTANTS SPARKS + COMPANY DESIGNERS www.csparksco.com tel 708.449.4030 fax 708.449.4033 3 Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 235 Westchester, IL 60154 I I i BACKGROUND Historical Challenges Aerial - Expansive Aerial - Close Up CONCEPT Concept Statement Site Plan Peripheral Intersections Aerial Hub Detail View Entering from 47 Hub Promenade Elevations 1 & 2 Elevations 3 & 4 Garage Sketch APPENDIX Interim Intersection 47 Design Study Ultimate Intersection 47 Design Study - Part 1 Ultimate Intersection 47 Design Study - Part 2 Site Plan Tabulations .. ... . . . . . r. Countryside Center 11.14.07 Background Historical i A Redevelopment Agreement was executed between the United City of Yorkville and ( Tri-Land Properties for The Countryside Center on March 8, 2005. 1—� Two schemes were prepared that met the conditions of the Redevelopment Agreement. j L _ OFFICE. r. OLD OFFICE. 1 WORINAL �j�. ---I \ Gb —� ;``B�iK BNSC / RETAILj, RETAIL R ro+' 1 m.° MEDICAL 1 NELSON LSON MEDICAL \ / FETW -.ma / �yF_ FUNERAL \ ', \ OFFICE NELSON FUNERAL ."` ii - _RETNLC ... REilamacA t. RETAIL 6 i 4 IRss. L.. i SHO 6 (OFFICE i py\ ` i OFFICE. OFFICE h •w RETAIL RETAIL xesae .. CASTL a.. b.,.1 p ' .oe 6WK e g CASTLE q rap.. 14Y c _ MODONALOS (SHELL OIL MCOONALOS SHELLOIL L_I SITE PLAN "A" SITE PLAN "B" Countryside Center 11.14.07 Background Challenges ADDRESSES Certain challenges to the redevelopment were SURROUNDING presented, affecting support for the originally RESIDENTIAL proposed schemes. ■ The realization of Kendall Marketplace, a new OPP, c location. 00 acre site, 1 mile west of the Countryside Center ■ Tri-Land Properties' delay in securing an anchor P�o�� 040 tenant. • ti desire oreaisir redevelopment l e ob1 ecve of creating p oduct complimentary w th the downtown redevelopment vision contained in the HUB Master Plan. (TOWN CENTER) ADDRESSES RETAIL ADDRESSES SURROUNDING SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL L , f"1 ACTIVITY NODE l HOTEL L l ; L 43 I:i Rrtr...�..,'�_.-•;�...�,.�,a•,,,.'L�4 i�'"N Y Countryside .Er"�f�.A,("..,y^'.`.j':';�'M..:�x•a.'u tw S j-!2o.,,�'Y.,y'r.,�w.y•,-.,P':��te�`i:7,K:. u�''L<Y'S,ll k�7:.•'<Y'1.`4°r"�^�'a'�n'n+�r:.r._yt.`4 r�''j,at..�".,�+F`•._AA S y_4'�SK.•l.a�,'J..r 1„I��.S7 s i lt ip T n U!�.tier A:'�1yA M1{-_�'"^q1`33Y.1��"4Il Y ts�•�t-:Y1 n n_�V.��.`,Ly.1 il•.;R•�1:�.-L i_`��h i>ti,r'5 lt Ai n,'��4V�YLa��i+;�'+x?Wy th a:..fi.ci:.r.s•.,1-.i n +,".�Y�,�ys,9 1'♦L_i-,i r A r,�4”-a e r_'L 1 Y i a£r\:.'..../1 L t'rr i��am:*t�=j`�_:,,y^},4,.'w`1a;'E+{!-�.A'.IS',11 ffi�ti*�-h't s'�.7x Ya��y<7;.,•,T'h$N i..'�L s^�/Iu��l'y,�t;'r�'.+`r t.t;.'3.?,����.a.r!�s��t 1 i-L�j��s�y Y��d�}�y,.v h''"''rp"1'Y."„hi""".4'�7,T�a"a k,.�xL�1 P wul.1r t�'�s G.L�.xycA,'p a�3f.ri_`�.��i,'`�'n'i���,+f�l$��,'-'=."i i r.!t e Y yff d�4.I q�'A�,.�.f t,?�n a.,I(`�/,�f'v`��t 4�'L�^1.ry-j`+r�Y^�.'t i'�`-"�t*�t�3=-A�.r iR°.fA_��t�-,^�,9Ei,L--,,�IS�3�T a�•l-o.'te'•\%a,i I,�r_iJ'4 l�r 1♦f f I.W Yorkville, Illinois' � AW i 7/y^"..^(1�,"ra��y'f�'.s.g,�jt"-���r .`- "Y,n_'a�F Y<-_ r•�Pr' orfL�y'p41,o F s�`.+�•'r eQ d Wal-Mart Kendall Marketplace Supercent,e�$r 7 Xl a+ o- { M 1�i�S.vJ.-.',+-A;'•„' n,/.�•+�•+4 n�.��A�=;:.'+.•':,f r*s,'-t:wi`..-Y"e�S,`.Fq r"°.'•!.�i'i�.":_rF-r�.�fY 1 F yr+..'+J?r�°i_Y,.f,eY..!_� .e.�'tC4/-4�s���r•-!.�,it.e f /�'"�^1-F.rry;.:.<-...�,`-+.7;F.-k.�-'•°JT-'4.T 5l�i�`r�-A>trr-'-i e;,��.,�d"',ss�Ey_'��,r i .+.ao-'•��+9.ti�.ti.y1-�u_lr�`."�/%�°f�4...a-�...^ef',•e�"'�/,f:�':,':'. }-% _s'K�..C r rs�,j.�''�;¢'s r 1���i A$�1 F�a f.r���,)/"C/Y P'�•sf"I 4 r i-r'�s/t r.. .�F'?•dsi,,ue."d'..L_k L1,�,`�.'/.,t'��.Yr .'^a l♦'fi 0 ui r nttty-tf..'`i a e s''`" g fT��a 19w4y�Nt�14.re ,, �..r w �� � i ILLINOIS d.i,s.f. ^{ •- e�= I :-- -',G girt..,41? '44% �7 WWI �qq Downtown Redevelopment . -.f:- _ .% 1jx7¢y'�L tfC•Iy f.y ^ ,,,� 6 �+. 'hP' - �:-. - .., ', .-' , t S.. , {, a Oy 1' i7�) `f►,L`� :' c ��4,E w.. � _ J rS{, .{. � { n •xy � - T� � � '�� - �.a�3 �il'37>� y k����4w'x' i.• I tl � .s �•y . rt , -.ir�'� 1 - , , 64 f. °4 _ . j' "7 { 7 1' cf ,yre,- ' �!' .�• ° • {L.�.a.t SYy3 � f' � -7 •7 - CT f; R� 1 � I • i�, ► *max' Ftd.t� 1 I. 1 ' 1 u�1 1 2 14AL A, IA id I 4b 1 _ 1 0 0 kv 171 n. i I Countryside Center Concept Statement Yorkville , IL . This development will anchor the north part of the community A "town center" design theme will treat the site holistically as and the Downtown Vision Plan redevelopment to the south . The a planning district and include proposed treatments to adjacent active hub of 34 and 47 is an ideal location for an outdoor lifestyle properties bordering the development site . The result will be a themed center or "town center " , including a mix of full and limited service site from 34 to Countryside Parkway, and from 47 to Center Parkway. dining , specialty retail , professional office , and a suites hotel in a unique , pedestrian -friendly environment . The design will include : Resting Places This "town center" will be an enduring , walkable , and integrated 0 Pedestrian - Friendly Medians open -air, mixed use development that is organized around a 0 Raised Crosswalks clearly identifiable and energized public realm where citizens 0 Advanced Stop Lines can gather and strengthen their community bonds . 0 Wide , Raised Sidewalks E - N On - Street Parking ■ Fountain (s ) Pavers & Planters ( Both loose & built- in ) Themed Way Finding Graphics ' I Over time , this "town center" should evolve into a dense , compact, and diverse part of the Yorkville community, with strong connections to its surroundings . The redevelopment will be designed with sustainability in mind . Some goals include : 0 Light pollution reduction and high efficiency luminaires Heat island effect green roof Storm water management Low VOC materials High insulation values Energy management systems Designed to encourage pedestrian use Promote use of recycled content building materials Shading to minimize heat gain fCountryside Center 11.14.07 Concept Site Plan ILI �- • • i 4) - I _ 0 Rtltl'F r ! [ . 4w RNtI RN w y Rp4'B" • • • \ �Re YT Symbol Legend I ! 1 1•� OWN* Shade Tree Evergreen hee R.n x Yq{ Ornamental Tree -- I Deciduous Shrub Evergreen Shrub (40U Ornamental Grasses 7_ Perennials and Seasonal Color 'I - • � Natural Stone[outcrop/boulders) x� ® Architectural Bement i L countryside center 11 . 14.07 Concept Peripheral Intersections I + ! I - - - -LU i s� + - - ---0 - - - � l - - _ = l + _ + i + I � I sow i ry ��5� + + + + North Gateway Entry Point Parkway Intersection Treatment -� scale: V=w Scale: T=59 + + A\ O + + � J _ - + - - Identification Architectural - Monument Sign Element Pavilion 14 Y \ 1 �3 r 7V R \ ' \ West Gateway Entry Point / 1 East Gateway / Identification Pavilion L� scale: 1. = ML Scale d"=5V lCountryside Center t t 14.07 Concept Aerial - - - I I I � o I i i i b I � D i O { I r d A I I I j I I --I Countryside Center 11.14.07 Concept Hub Detail D Fr _. _------ . j ,r LLd ♦ / ✓/� [ Countryside Center 11 .14.07 Concept View Entering from 47 J Ilk- - - - I I G t1° tRsteywT �wy. may` � fl L CCVAW (=1 Kxl ❑ ❑ U _� ". .�. ( 9i �0 'L g o u a o r • 4` �, 1 f i <j LO.. i I i i l i Countryside Center 11 .14.07 Concept Hub - - -- - i I i e i i I i _ i Countryside Center 11 .14.07 Concept Promenade I i I i i i �O • �14ME � .• � _ S ' i Countryside Center 11 .14.07 Concept Elevations 1 & 2 l i IS ISM mw W{�rj i i I yoa�as „ 1L7 IM1111 MEN ME G r ELEVATION 1 i i I I I i i i i i J� i ELEVATION 2 Countryside Center 11 . 14.07 Concept Elevations 3 & 4 i j i i i • y„ . .- S WOO ran c 1j: BONN i ELEVATION 3 i i i I r : W 1 - - _ snWrt�t1 I I I ELEVATION 4 I Countryside Center 11.14.07 Concept Garage Sketch Now i i i r I i i i Countryside Center 11 .1 4.07 Appendix Interim Intersection 47 Design Study 1 1 • � CAPACITY o1 516r. Uuor (?()Ill . NI t 1 NUMB[ R 1 Of IS 4 PLANE AREA DROP PEAS +OUR I Al TER 0.95 + ,INFRA NOTL`, CONWILYr,'. ( tI1fPL YUNP`GRtRNP DESIGN ISS) SEC IIE+ E PYi IIOf INTCPSECIPoN DELAY ARA SIC SEC INYLEIECTIORLF,vt : M, SIGNAL YtPC f.{ 1UpiE0 1`I+G<RaU USED IfC520{iR. kElt, 4.1a P,M. 36.. StL Of SERVICE PM D V 1'( SVilIHnESL OUdWANL. ICw N95L NW e1Lt P1a£OOI OLD AD CA UNAR 011IeN N OESIGnIX ilrvnf qOl 31 I rsJ tC S >LWt xl tnln_ sRro ' 1PPNOACH - B p 1- - D Ix ECOPROI5!_pplAAN1, SEES PULP Wit HL RESPONSE Ott MIRIAM GES16Y _ CO NIRYSIH (FOUR DRIVE:. ONULNt IaI OFy FIL I1 I:. RFFRT OF WAY S1NJSJ 10 NE YISID fSA W IDEAL PLAN IRf I'/AUIIOY. PORE -,I U i P( II10(M1CI fl411 P BUS STOP CONDIIDEN 1 ) PAYER CONERI 10 BL $FDQILIZER BY AHFAJII$ 3ARTS, ^ _ T 4.VAHR N: MANEUJfE/III. { (L flG11.IIL9jElOfL PAPING-2LII0x �OPUMVENl.390_ 2D121+�ii L �1N� C4ry Ena� 3011 PCDESIRIANS II,IER..puECLIEp 1D EIfF 1t1[LRLEt 11945 OLL 1001E 9t AT L. LIDO[ ]9 NIO It HpElt 4] ARRIVAL TYPE 4 4 4 R 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 DANE U It IZAT I ON LO .O LO 1.0 L0 10 IO 1.0 10 IA - -- 70 l� _CVJ..TPYSIOES£NIEB_ORLE L IS E NI 9.RQQh SES1 2412 FACTOR i + o'? .�.. 4 q.516N CRITERIA LII COHS[R0.1108 AH NRN1RBS. 38 Ph16Y pNSBCCLLD0tA d16l ll1ILRi . AVERAGE DAILY (RATE I', AD1 P I -- 7. Ott SIGN vittlet E AD 35, BASE SATURATION ELOW� IIUO 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 1906 1900 x OE51"9RSPEEOESILNAUON It H04)MPOl 15 f CLASS 0 fNIX FLOOD ER➢ ilvL. 0 DI ii ANCE 40' 149 47 106 036 AN 123 0 244 131 113 s 5 Lm+ LL 40 BU 9! C90NtflY5139 L.NIE3 D+ LANE GROUP I T R L T R I T R LANE WIRRU L >.0 i20 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PRACO mEL� io MY T -- f . Io 10464 a4 G4nnL $9420 20 10 ,.m In NO _ 20 COUNTRYSIDE ul PEECSIRId, vLT _. MINIMS EN - BICYCLE NOTES c L PEACE, wn dM - 0654 .0.59 N0.6] 0.65 0.54 0.6] 0.28 DV --019 0.28 - U.li FEE TIME GENERAL NOTFS (SEEON00, �GM 11 AN 80 80 IIm0 80 80 16 I6 16.SN1 16 16 N -. PPUI IlU ME MW PPUVIOED, CORP APPROACH GiApf) AE( (M at GrC RATIO ^ M+_ CENTER > IrrE D:G.IZ. CIDL AND OUT TER TO BE VSEp ON IY TER EGGfs a PATOAENi LT $PF 4ttLSS. j P,MJ 0 i8 O67 0.67 OOB 0,67 067 013 013 0.2] 0,13 013 3 Au ORANSIONS ARE SEONx f C OF PAVOSNi W.LLSS IlIDLlln15C-SLIER _. _.". - _ .� PRINT ARFW3 ILENIDmc IETEflSECt 4n IS PRL4d1HLT-C04WACM 11 RALUDI In1Et+WAF13 LURE i A.LANE GFRRAP AM_ 114 155 - 2.6 93 490 2.9 314 40.6 _ 31.0 3) 5 - 451 .:OyC,RESER FEE ILL 1Alf]. USE + - PM1 c,6 539 2J 44.G 110 13.8 51.7 95.1 _ 38,0 69.4 488 f 5 LATRENCE IQ pE A4APDARSE JLLRL ID41 SP9llGY ON 'ACCESS TO STATE IILO fYS: DEL NT OSI + VIC RATIO IA.M, Ol9 059 0,02 0.14 L09 0.11 005 000 0.09 0.92 096 i � L PAYLAUTO DLY[ES 4NIl,G ID HE IRIlCL4INN CE L:I1111L SNN Utt ON Iry1f06N Y RIM 0.20 1.06 0.08 0.90 0.91 0.10 053 0,00 0.49 CUTS 0.40 1. IMPAQAtE 1 PE IryLE1MSON51RCQt415N COMMERCIAL EEtRA,IgE 14 MATCH Y+19 LLV[t A A n - C D C C 0 SERVICE, E, A M 8 B �.. 0 _ Ip 1p p p li' t%tilltt4 lLLUf015 HpWE -9i _ B SERA Cf P p 0 a p 6 A 0 0 0 E 0 ~ - ~ T xxixc yo Tk s EERI@ uSLG YoTV+ +._ -. F 5 Cr:u J 4 _ . .. COME- CONC CBC 9 pE514R.ElCEPIl0N1 (SAFE IL l5N L SPACIH61£SS I HANSDWYIM. 3.440. -. 1012 30TH MAX, A M 61 595 25 60 9P 166 14 4U a0 89 f2 iT 0-6.12 MfSiDIlUlID L6 t HAS IIVEL DE 8R110E E IS `• x00PLP T�RATI if �AM ._ ]I 5�5 - HS 195 _ PITT 9H _ 85 1000 , 200 88 B0 6 IYJMID36f{ON(. J:BG AG451:nUlAFR R. OMIOESIGRP�hnSR1Ot£.LRRI�fnfila ACCIDENT LIAG0[tA4 WILL l'E-DLSILNLLD ENL FOIEUU LOAIIINLY Oil 151 IS 48 Ix µ LAFSTING EDGE ` EGG, SUDADER 1 (O� OTF�Ei - "_ . �1040GI6Ei PROP055R T _ ._ fiT. SHQLV0ER E%IStIN(III �Ef{ �. COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY iR P 5 @U 3 r _ - DL6 6RcYKDEA. _ A \\V /DIP SHOULDER - f 1' = Lit, Iii _SHOUTDEfl _ _ ___ - - .� _ . ._ OI Ow LOOP ?AV P n PROPOSED EDGE - - - Ex R- k it OF PAVEMENt 8 �. LX ROW _o + IE _ kMFAL _ LS' STORAGE tT(S }� - ---- Si Oil' 2{0+00 igek8 -- .� 4 IA5' 1012 f �1 T' CAP R __ ". . _. . ._ S. _. � . . . _ _ -. -YTF(i _ _- {M STERAC J . . .a C _- -- T�. 104' CAPER _ _ DSO � > _ _ SO EXISTING FUOF/ .. . 12 ' 01 AL'J aALS/ --_ �/ L ��ri._.} ) } \l - _ _. ff_ of .'AYEMEITI ,,,, °x Row IROPOS[n mlf/ ... -- IR 200 oT '.fl a -an. . -_. Ts-tmw \t ROPO4E ILf.11cE- ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 / Xo \E xtsnrvc �� AO C-f. IYP.) m f \ IOMR` CONC CB6 . E*IS ti Nf, VAVEMLN1x3EwID1N VAN`If Slli EWIQiII vFRiESI E tfir SEiOt)t.Of It i1i Z 01 o ARE NTED 10' OI { SEI o ILL IN0 } ROUTE -0] SIA J)6 Ifl.yO OF PAVEUENT 1 EXIST InG PAVE ft 1 IwNiH vARI[SI Iv 0 FO RICE a Iy TO 04 USED S DDT. ARTY VA O w TO BE I)vku AS HIT STRUMPET 4 L CA L �' -j COLNTRYSIPT CENTER OVIVE 262+50.00 IC F14. lISE6 AS bIC SIIOULOEF v Zr Ow tit �1 1l�L$ y V a PROP IEEP,E�ME+I NOTE: +1 IMPROVEMENTS CONSIST 324 5Y OF STRIVING 1,100lHCATIG'aS 0140 I PRIOR TO Si A, 232+55.00 � I I I I TnAFIC GAIN Oil 21% 11ccl, - 1, ! PSIT � .. ONN _L.. AAO d_:: I -- rI - - L,r -.t_ IP AT DAP AID jNTf R - ( ( 111(1N "( FSIGN > TIJOY PIR w.T+xx ++a Iv unc x�. a n ` . �..) `" � P: u Ise ^dll Rlbtl IN 70111 4 Py ,,. I ° W r AS 500 l 904 It 19 t 27 595 It02 I 35 I SD 6]5 1359 .0 JS ID51 Y *� B N Y y `} I' �. O N 'AG rviln Ual IS FINE l C I] AO 5I 56 2 - ?N 2] 61 TI 3h SD G9 84 N - ,� 595 II1521 j l 1 I e SORKYLLC fjP IN1UROlLW P FCJIE LV Ip ,HR + LIJVE 1 AE 0 U_ _+ . 25 85 I 0 0 2S 85 f 6I UD ,"_. l m k 4 ( a L mNAnox I .. +RA HM1 i6 ` i 'T )7 R PI J0 9LT 99I 19 50 _ I064 1169 l B ♦ M - na. PCI MI D 9 + bf 0 0 - 60 195 0 0 60 190 - aAw. I o �� rn[u e n too N,�o ,.p w , � -- - .. . 6 ILLINOIS IT) _� I2Ill11F 9 L e �� r.ev E s Y.3zo� A+E 110 lL E 0 HO L37 ]7 2 1 21 27 tEL 90 l9 hl 19i 116- m - ^^ I-- J 1,15( f �. - 1 RC { O 0 i5 DS _ 30I, _ - I revE6 lI ENylNEf STOP anff SFJ) SN.YN PC O N. - {D JG0 t J 0 4D m0 'It] I1)I1 1ta( ` � o laxs I . V. 0 J 1 G o 0 o D o ee iD6' ..�� �k ,) �� qE d 1It f7 uT +:. ,. _ it 9 3 1 1 26 89 DO al `I 01 104 1 A rT1 All CORE lOEnt I 15YG 21322 14] ] z4 PER i �)� ! uY 0 m v1 - � � OA IJ C, A 1 T 1 D T SN 1 I L J 1 1 I L n .N. 1 - I6 'l SC 19TL r U4 J4o4 i )0G [8 �f 'P+C r 1 51 CIIIII - 31 314 J [f..� - 0 1 on AI U CD - - X65 190 -- - _ - - 3 7 060 N I ToIAL DI s L 1 t] ! I u ] Ay t I ,y ] + , los Wit 1 n z 1 Countryside Center 11 .14.07 Appendix Ultimate Intersection 47 Design Study - Part 1 , I CAPACITY OESoTJ TL01 12011 - S(tf hUhlg Lit j 01 1 _ I f 4 Last ARE 4 PfAT IJUti (AIYGP D 9S _ O11BE[ ELCMEMS TU41 R9LL IN1 OF ICti 124. 11E C. rCLE AVERAGE OSLOE1 ,SZODOl AY AM. 219SF4 IN It itNVICt H 0. 1_ C ITS L DESlull OFSiI. 101 C U RlSIRP 32E It ORIVF dl SI 1EWC YGIGN !RIM AGF•A CYPE t.nppiE➢ . PROGRAM UCEp 11GS2004 YE1L 9.It! 1;!L -----L OI Slfl\'If,E PM. -y. COULT471IfU11 PROII\C - CNN RCII UL .CACILbIXI 2PPPOACI{ fl 1 C LY / V POU16 ] 6 YOU LT !11 I$ III Pp( I i[tSf HJiE BU2 9GP CONOIi100 ( ] IKIPAT(D L a CONSTRUCTION ZJ➢1 JAIL TNT! YEAH, 2COI . of *Net 1111?.- 1 Bus sl MA1owilit /1 R. A TRAFFIC COl ROL 10 BE SiCtil ➢ BY JEAR ANI5-1 A FN 2 -PEDESTRIANS EUVE LIICBCOhhE{i NICE INILIISECIIOY Lf IC1111815 ➢CUIE A[ AL US PECTIC 14 ANO IL HOUIC At AI C0pI11IRYSIOC Ff95WAY_ 511dLL 8E PROVION HII t I Con YET TIC IN"1.. 5 AvERACE DAILY TRAILC IMILl p ARRIVAL TYPE 4 4 -� 4 11 4 4 3 3 3 S 3 It AGREE 41 EXIANIN, lrf 2 2L➢bp JL41U SUIT) I t LANE U11L IZ.0 ION SIXItlIRY51LY IELILfI pRIYL , FE1SIllb. 9 I:UO6L 5550JNRY, _ I ACIOR 1.0 0.950 1.0 0.9P0 0.950 1.0- 10 I'D W 1.0 10 0. OESIC c 1'[ I 14 CN.I'11('.Lly[ - - - _ 7. OESIGA VE TIC E NA 55 _. . BASE SATURATION I IOW 1900 2000 1900 1900 2000 1900 )SLOP 2000 I9U0 1900 I90D e UNIX RCIn[ TCS4xA1RM & ITTEG£ 4715 A.6VU'S 11JFECALK lNUM p pIPArvLE F2 696' 60 146 SiJ 141 100 106 126 WA Y SPEED -. _LLFSUI£ ^L L04Y(9PSIP. LLxiLR pUV� -. a LATE OItLUI 1 T R L 1 R L 1 R L iR FOSI4 SPE£P . 40 IABI �0 W11 _ P ( LANE ROBINS II6 118/111 II8 160/13.1 11.8 II8 .. 120 12.0 V.0 120 IL0 POSYYO SPEED 10 VPIf _ _ . _ _ _ - - �,�'L�i'7 � W, vCOEStrtiul USAGE ABRIPAL Bit YCt[ VSAG6 4/3 _ . _ 3 RRELN TIME 4!R 11+56 16 _ 56rvp1T II 56 5615+7 7+30 30 _ 30H+11 7+30 50 GENERAL NOTES (SCOND$) PM 12+57 57 it 12 57 5715+7 7+28 28 B+5gd 7+20 28 - PRAPRES ARL 10 PROVIDED SINCE APVROACO ORApS ARE NEW, A,M 0 09 0.41 0.57 (CON 0.4 0.51 0.33 0.25 0.38 0.33 0.25 2 IYP[ 8-L24 c W O um R TER TO RE USED ON NJfEA CELCES C[ AR PCIIE O, hO INMt At C/L RATIO -0.23 L y PIA (YEN U 47 0 S7 010 6-i 1 0.51 0 52 0.38 Od2 0 23 4 )Y'E .8.612. LORD AIR CUT It" 10 0[ LOU) ON CLUB EOCCs Of PAVEMLRICf S15L BACS55 . Lntic CROUP A,4 537 181. ].4 50.7 231 EA 27.2 338 235 294 37.B CURVE i'R4iUUi ALL DIMENSIONS ALL SROWN E-1 Ol P CMENI WILLSSJII16AtlI5L AQIfI - _. PI STA. -233+26,43 (SECTIONAL P.AY 5'. 3 IU8 71 142 AAA 75 29.9 35J 213 309 300 DELTA 73455' 25,60" it1) + DIA Slmwuroum JNND Lip. 11nw.Utu (]lM!/£flLlu In NU1e1r iNU1R11Ym WIN I T 410.14 a R3T 1IR3402 SOJIM41f IIbJWA ! ANC Lip. V/C R ILO A.IA 0.29 047 GES 020 070. 0.23 064 000 0.07 0.37 OJl I R -II SI77 6 F1fIRU1CLJC Bf IN ACCC'.NINCL WLm 100!5 POLICY ➢H ACCESS LOIIAIL UIv 1Wn•S IIJA 0.35 0.93 0.10 0.59 0.79 0.13 0.23 0.00 0 35 0 39 OCT E 8133.97 I PAVEMENT N10 SILBILI T ` NC IN ACL0.9RNiCC Willi IRE 'LAlmAI On teUE1Vi.0 -. _. COUNTRYSIDE L1 =e0e.7e e.09 16rII TRAFFIC Camu➢Lnrnas'_ LEVEL OF A.M A B - A 0 C A - C C - C c 0 IC ST4. 229+16.29 CENTER a IN(`B LM J ri KCOxS1lWCnoN - -. SEfI i[f RM A C n U - C A C U C L - - I Pt SIA. = 211 a351F DRIVE I 90453 9 RIN41RD M0 LNfHt2 YU9FILED-USING fOlfl-llh --- - -- - _ I0 OE516N EXCEPTIOEO FIC 51C N4 P [INN Ils . 1 V1 IN1d cf ..{i0 T 2017 30111 MAX AJA 69 675 25 60 1054 191 _ IS 40 40 101 130 FL S13 - LS'i+YL63 N IxiIDSEtiION IS BOLA 1116N ACCIO➢ T LOL11L . . q � BEFORE TRAFFIC qM 84 1359 85 OIL 1169 116 85 200 200 104 95 P1 STA, = 243+80.39 12 10EN AC WA s R.ra m 0VISIO 9JmNG UMM YEAR PRFPmnTION. -1 SR SIOEW�trc COMB It Or C86 J �� �� TRANSITION ('P 6. 2006 81N MAX, AM 317 28 30 97 1A 1TI to 12 'M _ _ _ C ( &L q 3 TBUR1 r iRAr rlE 10.4. 575 ft Isr R COPIES CON d COMB LOh6 CP�6 N 3 PROPOSED s 5 Lrc 1 + 1 TRANSITION __ R 45_>SO' PROPOSED EDGE PR ILPQ0�SL6E. \ 10 OFFSET / OF PAVEMENT • • 01 AVEi1ENi 150 200' 4 TS . ., n I ;.U ' y IT H GU IC fAG_ . l6 OI REY ��l i P 6PRORAEO _1 - ' ry t1 f O 1 y t PROPOSED RIn __ -_-- X45, - ROw rx OW - ♦I R LSD _ - - --1 -_ - E x RILY' _ - -._ cl4�i STORAGE M ) JI -3bT TYLIBB ,IF I _ s A' S9 TAPER IS5 1 1.41. __ N R 1 A14Y STPP+AGf i r�+A'_-'���-A^� 0 L -- _ :Y -JOb TAPE 15L113- _ 230w0 - -° IBp SAPCR �' li_ y 150 STORE AGE 7St . Ir0D,p$ _ '�T 7inlS[If _ _ . �� ST r --: - - (q rvl - StJO' TAPtR Id P - 1 AAl ICU i I \ \`` J K f7 IAP�� , 1 1i0Y1 oil ILLINOIS °OUTE 47 - ._ �� 'I � � � - c0. now � �� LOUe c,6NN Esq (A Roh '- ' 122 R 4 200 L- m l0 OEC on Y t r B 624 z h [OMB Cg1 C PRpPO)EREUGE s � d I 1Y 0-6.24 0. PAVEMENT m OONSE 1OfE41 90 UO 00 I) DIAGONALS ED ED PRROf P. t Y MtNI it R=`.S IeV' 1 C(11AN COCA. 1 &y L0 C l IfYPJ CO CX TO COMB, 24C C&6 it 10 COFFEE TRANSITION la - n I WUNCITS I t CENTER ORI`.E TAS 02 ` 026 - - c COr)0, CONC CAf, _ 12 11 12 -Q ILLINOIS R0117i n7 METRIC An 5 9 W8 ---- --- - o a TRANSITION / 1 \\ COLAL TP DAIA I aotrx -Y P. <y)E a AM. .o NO, YOU Y151"Ou XILLA _ uIYA m NO u\ 11ry 'L; `J iolA A. '6Q6c &6J 1 \t _.TPTV0 LF21t FRUIT 1p cl lsN SIA 13�1A. 33 Io1 An I .S.1AAP INmtRUUI[ (111 IJMIAIE071SN.p Il74( /, 7 tN I YFV'M' I _. k .m� , f 1 ) 2 0 YORtt viol AC DO _ 90' IT 19 N 595 IISl 5 SD - 8t . 1359 �J 1 ( C 7111 FVAIflIV.,E SL lE1i lNIV1 AO N Ss 2 20 27 6 ll SS 63 84 1 6Y IIL31 LID E ' 0 0 2 ) BS ( 0 0 25 8 A I ' 69 841 . LD w4mlax ) L6 I 763 N7 IG )I 28 9/ i 991 39 50 TOOT ❑6'4 -� ' �,� i) �.. .. �1 unory u:. rc. a+l 95 _ C+f, 0 0 0 60 lJ , 0 0 60 19 n +e it - .° 1 ,cm. CYU 1X00., _. fal 19 '! 2 )i 2i 166 YE 1c I 191 OIL It LINO! • ftOUIE 4l I -- 1 .1i nu NO to o 0 n o D - o o 0 1 0 - < f �. 1L i 1 CAI_ ,�� eft ,i . . - � ti 1a,,. u.asl t lj v IY o C - 1, u 206 c D ao ��o . C6, 1r � � �� .� � � . . b� + I `F4 T� e i ` �p T � 'i I ICI 4j -",u a n151rr:(:D By >M L R titrLL IAA: nu zua nlvlsAL rout 11r { 0 3 I �I ITI 80 � 11 I 51 118 9, wlo c c• of ✓e 4 ' I I I: EL ( C G II ON b3 ] B 5 8 3 i IUI O4 L I - 1 ?14 _ _ L 1 l _ rn It- Oto y :a 4X10. ..I t L. � f • . 1070.1 r i r 10fAI NI 1 2 I ! \ / 5 I IP] 2211 C Ili! 31 4 I vlRO O l IO sI C1 1 ,L 31 I J 545 I1L 1' ( ipinl I 2C , 1 / ) I 367 ( i Y 399 i. .. LI 1. 9 3 i Countryside Center 11.14.07 Appendix Ultimate Intersection 47 Design Study - Part 2 _ CAPACITY DESIGN STUDY 12017) SHEET NUMBER 2 OF 3 4 PHASE AREA OTHER PEAK FOUR FACTOR 0 95- - ELEMENTS CONTROLLING DESIGN [rI- J2Q_SEC. CYCLE AVERAGE INTERSECTION DELAY A.H.)Q9SEC. INTERSECTION LEVEL A.M.--C. 1. OET1Gx OESIGU 11G4[AP RW' v6Jl ROUTE 7)T _IFIR" -LC KGtQNk. ARI RIk 5Nq SIGNAL TYPE ALTi 411 1E0 PROGRAM USED HC52000 VER, 4,1e F.M.ZO 9 SEC. Or SERVICE P.M. C MONIRISIDE FARINA,- LOCd EE"AD APPROACH A B C 0 _ -- _- - 3. f.A,P.J,IO��j6,11 RWIE ".15 IRE PNfrENLxq:flWiE I aNAF IC 1f0 YEAR Or C15106 C110W SpQLBWLO' :�ZH9L Pf514N YEAR:�,91L_ f BUS SLOP NEUVERIHR 6 Ia.IrrlC[WtaOL i0 B[S/pIf11ZF8JEXISI or 1Q.RP 1 ' PARKING MANEUVER/HR. -_--- --- mra nrm _ _ -_JtlfHGOtlNEC]LRLL3NLl(LiCflTE[i1P9S.L[_LL.BCYIE�IIS-VS e9WLla_�-L=eT PEDESTRIANS er [�[j] n cx1 a W v[.}By<-BE.pnpyJpLp_y1C,1ElPfdi_O413LSA�yE.-_ _. -... [8.36 S AVERACE DAILY TRAFFIC Ix91r OAT&.APRI_VeL rTPE 4 4 4 1 / 3 3 _.. J 3 IL 4WTF�7� fxITIIMG:YQ$§P 4�6.3063Q1(Qlll-LANE VCTOR TIOx [K(oR L0 0.952 L0 L0 0.952 1.0 L0 L0 L0 IA UE.l. pi.T1. vErv1E BASE SATURATION FLOW 1900 2000 1900 1900 1900 1900 2000 1900 _2000 1900 6, T.UCX RWTE 0 - OIS+ANCE 58' Fill 212' 142' 641" 133' 62' 254' S4•_ If6s, vCfO, _iLP➢il;dI rolglPr•of Paaxwer GAWP l T fl L TR L T P T R DESIGN SPEED,_ u �D11Pil POSTED SPEFG +0 Nrv, _-LANE WIOiNT 11.8 ILe N.8 11.0 11.0 11.8 11.8_ ILB _ 11.8 11.8 10. XOFSYRIm USAGE: xrue, OlaclC USacc:GREEN TIME IUM 0.52 52 52 8.52 52 _ 36 )6[5.8 __36 36K.8 u GENERAL NOTES ISECONDSI P.M. 1.56 56 56 7K6 96 7.34 -34 34K+i 7.3tl 4- 34+5.1 - I. "(WILES adE/N01 PaOVIDE0.SINCE APPaOACN GRADES nPE EXISTING. r ? AN, 0.53 0.44 0.44 0.53 0.44 0.40 0.31 0.30 0.40 0.31 0_30 1 C/C R4L10 CURVE PN4IUL i-2 3. IYrF 8352 CHAT M9 GUTTER 10 0E OSFO On Wlffl LOGES or PAYMENT g.JL_90LL[L41. ( _ P.M 0.56 0.41 0.47 0.56__0.47 0.30 0.29 0.28_ 0.38 0.29 0.28 PI SSA. -241.40.65 ]. TYPE Auz MAN AVP ORRIE.+D 8F USEO OR ROVER FD6fS OF PAVEH[Ni_� rc wtl LANE GROUP A.N 10-4 I8J 16:9 IOd 21.1 23,4 28.9 31.8 22.0 29.1 29.5 DELTA =3'S2' 08.09" 1Rb 4. ALL DIMINSFOR [9HDNxrE-C a P"EMEx7 SRUfss_OTtEA r DELAY A -11.972.84 vw",rrau v[7)w r LSECONDSI P.N. 13.0 318 15.5 13.0 24.T 25.6 31.1 36.1 24.2 ]0.9 __32.0 1 =407).39 s JRFAW 1OxJT_P H.-- L =808.31 e.,.7)arcmrxr a ASn x x xe ( A,u 0.11 0.33 0.14 0.3T 0.55 0.22 0.02 p.22 0.04 0.04 0.01 E =6.113 6 gµpO +"" 4 r x-Ar:'r.a rnsultwcHnen.'_ VIC RATIO P.M 0.30 0.94 0.29 0.25 O.BT 0.25 0.10 0.50 0.(0 0.08 0.12 PC STA. 237.36.26 T. P xrc�,e,D-51GDINL re rc x errommLLTitiN+xF .0 NFILDgY-_ PT STA. : 245144.73 _.._ _ _ _._ - - __. 4RmF r rnxrmN LEVEL Dr A.M. B C B H C _ E C E C C f COUNTRYSIDE PARKWAY --- __ f TEflvl[E P.M B L B B C C C 0 C C C PARKWAY 9.�LL111B4.kuYC4cBls_%ERQt[DJisI11N�L.uFOluflx. A,M 36 453 123 170 756 115 10 134 21 21 36 19._DES_L1xcE+e7roxTrtaefflLSLOx�-}p,AQI[�LE45 7xAHA a<.3419] --.HOUR 3TRA MAX. 11.Ix1CR5ECi10 1_T xOY a xl(s e[CIO IX iJ qE HOUR 1RAFFLL pyM T2 1318 239 94 1255 _ 121 52 24T_ 45 45 81 E%I511_Nq EDGE 12.RILx7 0[NAY SXOhLT 10 V11510 WRIxC F Nnl PuX PKPAanPLON 2006 BIH MAX. 4 M. 267 407 _ 122 29 _ Of PAVEMENT 62- HOURLY iNeF(i< P,M, 48T 192 61 I / E% [OMB. CON( Ct.G rX B 6.24 TI G ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 ENGLISH$Ter 243.0::98- I r _ ! _PROPOSED _ w PROPOSED I_-1 3•oe C.. 5 SIDEWALK w0 l_J .5 r S' SIDEWALK PROPOS£p F,QCE { ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 PROP SED_E,UEE Or PAVEMENT Of PAVEMENT COMB.CONC GILD ! - CBMR- CONE Cd4 f}LISp.�Aj IUI_y R=75' i 8-624 lY--6--6.24 0=65' .. •. EX AOW m .-; i �� __PROPOSED R.O.W. EN RO 1 O 1 I RA „^y 9 TAPE - - R 1351)- - - m 9 - d m 3 _ _ .. - _ _ . _.-----._ _230' STORAGE EX -ROW � -__� - 1 -EW RP.'X \ [_J 11 IY NT I]f'RV • TY 0�ONC fgG, / \ TY 8'6.24 1 I( PROPOSED-N If IY' DIAGONALS - -a0'[-L rtr ,i 1 � TRAFFIC DATA ` - rt.az4w rtxw: --�srw.R9 7)w I IL NOIS ROUTE 41 ENGLI SH ISH STA. 243.18.14 LOCATION MAP INTERSECTION DESIGN STUDY ovFKx: So x Y.,.W px.4 rtM(w,F.- lo,«V.. ,«>ric - ToI N IRONC L s.: (LIL TIMATE) IN.1.5.1 M r r.M a.,- rM .- Fx FAY, ROUTE J26 <ILl IN0 T AB S69 910 It Z3 _ 50 453 13 F8 _ 123 p}gl - Ri Tx auuiE an _, 7)O_ 15 25 I 140 180 36 72 - .- �, tl53(1]781 YOIIItviLLE aG,IE _ ;cgyNT T PuiXJerl- _ AC 10_2 209 _l _ 21 _ 14 123 _239 = i n -PHASE 1 PNaSE 11 wuTE 111 PEAS[Iv IxiaErrnox m WGMN 5(0.X0. PERUIT ARE L-9544- l . BA 561 197 i3 23 49 r22 1191 = ° - u° + L scut cGU rr xExouL B[_ 14_2 11 4 2D 29 110 47) } - _ Be JI 54 4 _ 10 19_ _ 30 61 _ II lIN01S ROUTE 4i- ��' D' �.�.' W a' / f .` 'a•' F2< -) p PE V.XO. _- 4_9 I _ II 6__ 10 52 B e ep;r[„ -- -- - CA 95 109 1 JI I 115 121 F _ �3 ,�� �� • p g e k F 0 - _ _..-_ - 9 14411 CB NIB 191 1 14 29 ❑4 241 r° 1° 'm o ___...__. --722 NI911 _ ° m OC 2U _ 43 I 5 4 21 45 Q x _-- _ --. L 34 164, n «1114°. _ N -_ `• DB _16__ 39 l ]I 15 _21 45_ 1 AN G11FEN 8.0 3.00,0 GPCEN M.0 SR20 4REEIl R.0 3.00-0 Lfl(EN ' 510 ].O F. x .-DA 16 , .20__ - I. 125 189 -_36 - 8 I Pu ca[EX- r,9 ao 0.6-GnEEe. 34 0 39 to GOFER 1.0 v9 0.0 iacEx_sc.9 S.o zO _.. .- rOrAl A 1154 2006 1485 3082_ x T01 AL B 1243 _2033 -- _..,_ _-1534 2969- 201?OR D awa 701AL C 48 635 R3 _ 148 TOTAL D _107__ 230 .. IAS SWEE12IX `� � � UNTRYSIDEP AY �.�.D�Np grypfye Nr LEI/ 11K' OFFICE RINK � R All g _ • w1 (� Mod ` ``d I' " " " IIIIU ]PAt " " " illU D e D ETAIL ' 'M -- 0 25 600 1 I Lower level Parking R-TAIL D � A Scalaa"=20Y AS O 1 000 m°•I � ✓ � I 11 — _ ® e � \ val r e . s I � ] hA rxn 1 n I RESif 1 e'er j RETAILA �1 ' A EO.n. }1 RETAtL B' I h A 10.000SOFT 11 FILE 34,1 SI YI o FILE INS mffm D ��Ilµlf!j1Flf9(Jl T``, R16p' BYf 11 ESi1 Nyy byN'111Y SRI I a LIT 6 LIT B NK Er p y \V A y\ \ MCFD�OINrA�L AIDS I Conceptual Plan 'D' ENO �Altemate Option Retail Anchor Retail Anchor B Scale: I"= 200' PLAN OPTION ' D ' CALCULATIONS WITH HOTEL PLAN OPTION ' D ' CALCULATIONS WITH RETAIL ANCHOR IN PLACE OF HOTEL SITE AND BUILDING AREA- OPTION ' D ' SITE AND BUILDING AREA - OPTION ' D ' • SITE AREA • SITE AREA TOTAL SITE AREA ±792, 114S.F. ± 18. 184 ACRES TOTAL SITE AREA ±792, 114S.F. ± 18. 184 ACRES • BUILDING AREA • BUILDING AREA - RETAIL 'A' 30,000 - RETAIL 'A' 30,000 - RETAIL 'B 34, 100 - RETAIL 'B' 34, 100 - OFFICE ABOVE 26,700 - OFFICE ABOVE 262700 - RETAIL 'C' 25,600 - RETAIL 'C' 25,600 - RETAIL 'D' 25,900 - RETAIL 'D' 25,900 - OFFICE ABOVE 14,400 - OFFICE ABOVE 14,400 - RETAIL 'E' 2,700 - RETAIL 'E' 21700 - RETAIL 'F' 2,700 - RETAIL 'F' 2,700 - REST. 1 100000 - REST. 1 10,000 - REST. 2 51300 - REST. 2 5,300 - HOTEL 1 96,700 (4 STORY BUILDING) - RETAIL 'G' 30,000 TOTAL RETAIL SPACE 121 ,000 TOTAL RETAIL SPACE 151 ,000 TOTAL OFFICE SPACE 41 , 100 TOTAL OFFICE SPACE 41 , 100 TOTAL RESTAURANT SPACE 15,300 TOTAL RESTAURANT SPACE 15,300 • TOTAL G.L.A. 274, 100 S.F. • TOTAL G.L.A. 207,400 S.F. PARKING ACTUAL SPACES REQUIRED SPACES RATIO USED PARKING ACTUAL SPACES REQUIRED SPACES RATIO USED RETAIL 502 484 4: 1 RETAIL 633 604 4: 1 OFFICE 124 124 3: 1 OFFICE 124 124 3: 1 HOTEL 107 107 1 : 1 RESTAURANT 142 124 8: 1 RESTAURANT 142 124 8: 1 GRADE LEVEL TOTALI 688 1 1 GRADE LEVEL TOTALI 712 LOWER LEVEL TOTALI 187 1 LOWER LEVEL TOTALI 187 GRAND TOTAL 875 1 839 GRAND TOTAL 899 852