Plan Commission Packet 2007 12-12-07 car o United City of Yorkville
J '`� 800 Game Farm Road
[If EST. �� , 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560
-c -� Telephone: 630-553-4350
o �
0� ,YS"t p Fax: 630-553-7575
K,11 C...ty
L E
PLAN COMMISSION
AGENDA
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
City Council Chambers
800 Game Farm Road
Meeting Called to Order: 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call:
Previous Meeting Minutes: November 14, 2007
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Hearings: Requested by Petitioners
1. PC 2007-36, Marlo Letterle, petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of
Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting annexation and rezoning from Kendall
County A-1 Agricultural to A-1 Agricultural with Special Use. The real property consists of
approximately 11 acres, located at 4378 Eldamain Road.
- Action Items
i. Annexation
ii. Rezoning
iii. Special Use
New Business
1. PC 2007-35 Lincoln Prairie
- Action Items
i. Preliminary/Final Plat
Additional Business - Presentation
1. Overview of November 15 Kendall County Plan Consortium meeting by John Hegeler
2. Review Advisory Committee December 20, 2007 Agenda and Group Discussion Facilitator
information and sign-up
Page 1 of 5 R1�F
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
PLAN COMMISSION
YORKVILLE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Wednesday, November 14, 2007 7:00pm
Chairman Anne Lucietto called the meeting to order at 7:00pm.
Roll Call:
Members present: Brian Schillinger, John Hegeler, Jack Jones, Michael Crouch, Charles
Kraupner, Tom Lindblom, Sandra Adams, Clarence Holdiman, Anne Lucietto.
Absent: Jeff Baker
A quorum was established
Other City Staff.
Mayor Valerie Burd, Travis Miller-Community Development Director, Lynn Dubajic-
Economic Development Director, Gary Golinski-Alderman.
Guests:
Matt Schury-Kendall County Record, Dan Kramer-Attorney, Christine Vitosh-Court
Reporter, Bob Mandemack, Dan Lubic, M. Sheehen, Richard Brummel, Rowena
Vergara-Beacon News, Stan Weisbrod-Charles Sparks & Co., Sean Michels-McCue
Builders, Charles Sparks-Charles Sparks & Co., Brad & Meghan Schroeder,
K. Kowalski-Eldamain Farm, Dave Beck, Dale & Ethel Perkins, Richard Dube-Tri-Land
Properties, Inc., Bill McCue-McCue Builders, Glenn Johnson-Tri-Land Properties
Previous Meeting Minutes: October 10, 2007
The minutes were approved as read on a motion and second by Lindblom and Crouch
respectively. Approved unanimously on a voice vote.
Public Hearings: Requested by Petitioners
Chairman Lucietto noted that Public Hearing PC 2007-35 Letterle Annexation and
Zoning would be postponed to December 12. Travis Miller stated that notices had been
sent to the property owners, however, the published notice from the City had an incorrect
date, making it invalid. Therefore, the hearing needs to be continued. As a result,
Chairman Lucietto entertained a motion to open and close the Public Hearing. It was
moved by Jones and seconded by Adams to open the Hearing. Passed unanimously on a
voice vote.
Dan Kramer, Attorney for the petitioner, stated that the notice will be re-published in the
newspaper and courtesy notices will be sent to other interested parties. A motion to close
the Public Hearing was then made by Crouch and seconded by Hegeler. It was approved
by all on a voice vote.
i
Page 2 of 5
Chairman Lucietto then conducted a swearing-in of all who would speak at this meeting.
1. PC 2007-36, PC 2007-36, Stanley and Diane Pobol, petitioners. The
petitioners filed an application requesting R-1 zoning upon annexation to the
City, which was approved by City Council on October 9, 2007. This request
is for 4.53 acres located at 9255 Lisbon Road, Yorkville.
The Public Hearing was opened at 7:35pm on a motion by Jones and second by Crouch.
Roll call vote was taken: Jones-aye, Hegeler-aye, Lindblom-aye, Holdiman-aye, Crouch-
aye, Kraupner-aye, Adams-aye, Schillinger-aye, Lucietto-aye. Unanimous vote.
Hearing closed at 7:37pm on a motion by Jones and second by Crouch. Approved
unanimously on a voice vote.
See Court Reporter 's transcript of Public Hearing.
Discussion: Lindblom questioned why the petitioners wished to annex. Attorney Kramer
said that at the time of the request, there was indication that the property in between
might request to be de-annexed.
Action Items
i. Annexation-already completed
ii. Zoning: Travis Miller said staff recommends rezoning this property to
estate district.
iii. Special Use: no further action needed
A motion was made by Schillinger to approve the estate zoning, subject to staff
comments for PC 2007-36. Crouch seconded the motion. Motion approved unanimously
on a roll call vote:
Jones-aye, Hegeler-aye, Lindblom-aye, Holdiman-aye, Crouch-aye, Kraupner-aye,
Adams-aye, Schillinger-aye, Lucietto-aye.
2. PC 22007-37 Mc Cue Builders, petitioners, filed an application for an
amendment to a Planned Unit Development Agreement. This is for 60 acres
of property south of Route 34 on Cannonball Trail.
This Hearing was opened at 7:43pm on a motion by Crouch and second by Jones and
approved unanimously on a voice vote.
See Court Reporter 's transcript of Public Hearing.
The Public Hearing was closed on a motion and second by Crouch and Jones
respectively. It closed at 7:45pm following a unanimous voice vote.
i
Page 3 of 5
Discussion: Travis Miller reviewed the staff comments and summarized the two
requests.
1 . Front yard setback is requested to be five feet closer to the street to allow for
ranch style footprint on the Rt. 34 portion. Staff concerns included utility
easements, however, they determined it would not cause problems for the
infrastructure. The five feet will be recovered in the rear yard setback.
2. Lot coverage ratio: the request was for all lots in the R-4 zoning and is for 40%
coverage rather than 30%. Staff recommended that a minimum of 50% of all
units should have a covered porch.
McCue representative, Sean Michels, said most porches would be decorative. Bill
McCue also gave an overview of their home plans and porches. Schillinger asked if
porches might be enclosed therefore increasing the square footage. McCue said they are
only striving for curb appeal. He said there would also be some brick on the front.
Schillinger also expressed concern for age-targeted /age-restricted neighborhoods and
density. He said national builders could come in and promote age-targeted communities
to increase density if the lot size is smaller. There is also the possibility of one developer
selling to another and their standards might not be the same.
Mr. McCue said he thought 70% of the homes would be ranches. Jones suggested a cap
of 75%.
Action Item:
i. PUD Amendment
After some further discussion, Lindblom made a motion to recommend approval of the
changes in the setback with 40% lot coverage for 50% of ranch homes in the subdivision.
Crouch seconded the motion. There were some brief comments.
Roil call vote was taken: Hegeler-aye, Lindblom-aye, Holdiman-aye, Crouch-aye,
Kraupner-aye, Adams-aye, Schillinger-aye, Jones-aye, Lucietto-aye. Motion carried
unanimously.
3. The Village of Montgomery and United City of Yorkville are considering
approval of a Boundary Line Agreement pursuant to 65 ILCS 5111-12-4.
A motion was made by Jones and seconded by Crouch to enter into Public Hearing. All
were in favor following a voice vote. The Hearing opened at 8:10pm. It concluded at
8:25pm and a motion was made by Jones and seconded by Crouch to officially close the
Hearing. All were in favor on a voice vote.
See Court Reporter 's transcript of Public Hearing.
i
i
Page 4 of 5
Discussion: Lindblom asked if nearby Willowbrook residents had been notified of the
Boundary Agreement. They had not been notified. He further stated they are supporters
of the Yorkville schools and that verbage should be included to prevent forced
annexation. Crouch noted that Yorkville has a policy of no forced annexations. Mayor
Burd said verbage was to have been included in the agreement.
Kraupner asked if the north/south boundary was on Dickson Road. It is actually west of
Dickson Road. It was noted that a couple properties on Dickson Road do not wish to be
force annexed.
Action Item:
i. Boundary Agreement
A motion was then made by Lindblom and seconded by Crouch to accept the boundary
agreement with the inclusion of a statement relating to non-forced annexation by either
community. It passed unanimously on a roll call vote: Lindblom-aye, Holdiman,
Crouch-aye, Kraupner-aye, Adams-aye, Schillinger-aye, Jones-aye, Hegeler-aye,
Lucietto-aye.
New Business:
1. PC 2007-38 Menard's 6th Addition
This property is adjacent to Countryside Parkway. Miller said a request has been made to
divide lot 4 into 3 parcels and he reviewed staff comments, including a staff
recommendation in favor of this request. There was no discussion.
Action Items:
L Preliminary Plan
Lindblom moved and Crouch seconded a motion to accept the preliminary and final plat
subject to staff comments. Lucietto noted that two separate votes would be needed. A
roll call vote was taken on the preliminary plan portion as follows: Holdiman-aye,
Crouch-aye, Kraupner-aye, Adams-aye, Schillinger-aye, Jones-aye, Hegeler-aye,
Lindblom-aye, Lucietto-aye.
ii. Final Plat
A motion was then made by Crouch to approve the Menard's final plat and it was
seconded by Jones. A roll call vote was taken: Crouch-aye-Kraupner-Adams-aye,
Schillinger-aye, Jones-aye, Hegeler-aye, Lindblom-aye, Holdiman-aye, Lucietto-aye.
i
Page 5 of 5
Presentation:
1. Countryside Center Concept Development Plan by Tri-Land
Richard Dube, President of Tri-Land, gave a presentation of the concept plans for
Countryside Center. He had previously met with Mayor Burd to discuss a vision for the
property. A design firm, Sparks & Co., was then hired and a mixed-use, town center type
look was designed.
Charles Sparks described the amenities that are under consideration: hotel, retailers,
pedestrian-friendly areas, fountains, raised sidewalks, pavilion, office space, restaurants,
promenades, prairie-style architecture and others. Mr. Dube added that approximately
160,000 square feet of retail space would be available on this 18-acre property.
Chairman Lucietto asked if the designers had considered elements of sustainability.
Sparks & Co. is looking at silver and platinum.
Traffic concerns were discussed since Rte. 47 is already congested. Travis Miller said
the plan has been submitted for IDOT review and they already recognize the need for a
signal that would probably be located near Dunkin' Donuts.
The Commission members gave favorable comments for the plan as presented and Mr.
Dube credited the Mayor for her input on some of the design elements.
Mr. Dube said the concept plan will be presented at the City Council meeting on
November 27th.
Other Business:
Chairman Lucietto noted that she had obtained a subscription of Planning
Commissioners ' Journal that contains ideas from other towns. She asked for feedback
from the commission members.
There was no further business and Crouch moved for adjournment, followed by a second
from Hegeler. On a voice vote, the meeting was adjourned at 9: 15pm.
Respectfully submitted by
Marlys Young, Minute Taker
PLAN COMMISSION MEETING
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE , ILLINOIS
REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had at the meeting
of the above - entitled matter taken before
CHRISTINE M . VITOSH , C . S . R . , on November 14 ,
2007 , at the hour of 7 : 00 p . m . , at 800 Game Farm
Road , in the City of Yorkville , Illinois .
D - 832707
aPage 2
1 P R E S E N T :
2 MS . ANNE LUCIETTO , Chairman ;
3 MR . CLARENCE HOLDIMAN ;
4 MR . CHARLES KRAUPNER ;
5 MR . MICHAEL CROUCH ;
6 MS . SANDRA ADAMS ;
7 MR . TOM LINDBLOM ;
8 MR . BRIAN SCHILLINGER ;
9 MR . JACK JONES ;
10 MR . JOHN HEGELER ;
11 MR . TRAVIS MILLER ;
12 MS . MARLYS YOUNG ,
13
14
15
16 - - - - -
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 3
1 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Open PC 2007 - 35 ,
2 the letter of annexation and zoning .
3 MR . JONES : So moved .
4 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Do we have a
5 second?
6 MS . ADAMS : Second .
7 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Motion and
8 second . All in favor say aye .
9 (A Chorus of Ayes )
10 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Not in favor say
11 nay .
12 (NO Response )
13 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . We are
14 now in public hearing , pC 2007 - 35 , and the
15 petitioners are requesting to continue this to
16 the December 12th , 2007 Planning Commission
17 meeting .
18 MR . KRAMER : Right . And just for
19 the record , Dan Kramer on behalf of the
20 petitioner .
21 The City will republish the
22 notice in the newspaper and we will send out
23 courtesy notices , just not certified, to all the
24 people on that list again of the continued date .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 4
1 Thank you .
2 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Do we have a
3 motion to close this public hearing?
4 MR . CROUCH : So moved .
5 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Second?
6 MR . HEGELER : Second .
7 MS . ADAMS : Second .
8 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : All in favor?
9 (A Chorus of Ayes )
10 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Anyone not in
11 favor?
12 (No Response )
13 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . The
14 public hearing is continued to the December 12 ,
15 2007 meeting .
16 Now I ' m going to ask anyone in
17 the audience that wants to speak or feels you
18 might speak , okay , please stand up . I ' m going to
19 ask you to raise your right hand and repeat after
20 me .
21 ( Witnesses sworn)
22 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : All right . Now
23 I entertain a motion to entertain PC 2007 - 36 ,
24 Stanley and Diane Pobol .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
i
' Page 5
1 MR . JONES : So moved .
2 MR . CROUCH : Second .
3 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . We are
4 now in public hearing for PC 2007 - 36 .
5 WHEREUPON :
6 DANIEL J . KRAMER ,
7 testified before the Yorkville City Council as
8 follows : j
9 MR . KRAMER : Good evening . Dan
10 Kramer . My address is 1107A South Bridge Street ,
it Yorkville , Illinois . I am an attorney licensed
12 to practice law in the state of Illinois and
13 represent the petitioner .
14 This one is somewhat of an
15 unusual procedure in that the property has
16 already been annexed into the United City of
17 Yorkville . It ' s a little over four- acre parcel
18 that ' s contiguous to the North Star property that
19 was annexed to the property on the east boundary
20 of North Star .
21 The property is accessed by a
22 long private easement off Lisbon Road to the
23 west . It ' s over 1100 feet to get back to where
24 the home is , and we have to assign the zoning
- 0030
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983
Page 6
1 class for it . We filed as a R1 , which is the
2 default zoning .
3 Frankly , the petitioner does
4 have horses there , so we are fine if you want to
5 do a more restrictive class , estate or
6 agriculture , under the City . We ' re fine with
7 either of those .
8 I think Travis ' recommendation
9 was the estate class , which is fine with us .
10 There ' s no new improvements to it . It ' s just
11 again , assign a zoning class to the parcel that ' s
12 already annexed .
13 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Great . Does
14 anyone in the audience have any questions or
15 issues or anything about this particular
16 property?
17 (No Response )
18 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay , That
19 being the case , I ' d entertain a motion to close
20 this public hearing .
21 MR . JONES : So moved .
22 MR . CROUCH : So moved . Second .
23 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Who was the
24 first ? Jack . Okay . All in favor say aye .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 7
1 (A Chorus of Ayes )
2 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Not in favor?
3 (No Response )
4 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . Public
5 hearing is now closed .
6 ( discussion had off
7 the record )
8 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Have a motion to
9 open PC 2007 - 37 , McCue Builders public hearing .
10 MR . CROUCH : So moved .
11 MR . JONES : So moved .
12 MR . JONES : Second ,
13 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : All in favor say
14 aye .
15 (A Chorus of Ayes )
16 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Not in favor ,
17 nay?
18 (No Response )
19 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : We are in public
20 hearing . And who is representing - -
21 WHEREUPON :
22 SEAN MICHELS ,
23 testified before the Yorkville City Council as
24 follows :
983 - 0030
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 )
Page 8
1 MR . MICHELS : I am Sean Michels with
2 McCue Builders . It ' s been a while . How are you?
3 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Good .
4 MR . MICHELS : We have two requests
5 before you tonight , front yard setback request
6 and a lot coverage ratio request .
7 The front yard setback , we ' d
8 like to move the house five feet closer to the
9 front yard - - front property line , and then in
10 return staff has suggested make our rear yard
11 setback instead of 25 feet , go with 30 feet , and
12 then the lot coverage ratio we ' d like to increase
13 at least 50 percent of the units in the district
14 to 40 percent and keep the remaining 50 percent
15 at 30 percent , so we concur with what staff has
16 recommended .
17 MR . SCHILLINGER : Can you clarify
18 what at least 50 percent is ? 50 percent could be
19 at least at - -
20 MR . MICHELS : No . The R4 lots , 50
21 percent would be allowed .
22 MR . SCHILLINGER : I thought you
23 said - -
24 MR . MICHELS : No . I ' m sorry .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
* y
Page 9
1 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . Are there
2 any questions or comments from people in the
3 audience that were sworn in?
4 (No Response )
5 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Seeing none ,
6 close the public hearing , is there a motion?
7 MR . CROUCH : So moved .
8 MR . JONES : Second .
9 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : All in favor say
10 aye .
11 (A Chorus of Ayes )
12 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Not in favor .
13 (No Response )
14 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : We are closed .
15 ( discussion had off
16 the record)
17 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : The next item on
18 our agenda is the boundary agreement between the
19 village of Montgomery and the United City of
20 Yorkville , and we are going to go into public
21 hearing for that , so I need a motion to go into .
22 MR . JONES : So moved .
23 MR . CROUCH : Second .
24 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : So we have a
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 10
1 first and a second to go into the boundary
2 agreement between the Village of Montgomery and
3 the United City of Yorkville . All in favor say
4 aye .
5 (A Chorus of Ayes )
6 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Any nays ?
7 (No Response )
8 CHAIRMAN - LUCIETTO : We will go into
9 it and then we will come out of the public
10 hearing to discuss .
11 MR . MILLER : I ' m going to refer to
12 the November 1st staff report just give you the
13 background and the actions in front of you , and I
14 previewed this under official business at last
15 month ' s meeting , so as we go through the
16 discussion , I want to refer to the back pages of
17 the draft annexation agreement as I described .
18 it may be easier to visualize .
19 Exhibit A shows the proposed
20 boundary line . The discussions started in the
21 summer , this summer , between the staff at the
22 direction of the mayor and village manager of
23 Montgomery , myself and community development
24 director for the Village of Montgomery , and our
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 11
1 staffs have met on several occasions to talk
2 about the terms of the boundary agreement and to
3 try to formulate a draft agreement to be
4 presented to the boards of both communities for
5 their consideration and for approval .
6 The concepts , a draft was
7 submitted to the City Council in October . The
8 City Council reviewed it and immediately asked
9 for the Plan Commission ' s review and
10 consideration . There was a public hearing and
11 this draft is before you for consideration .
12 So this is the actual public
13 hearing being conducted for the consideration as
14 required by state statute for a boundary
15 agreement between two municipalities .
16 Geographically speaking , the
17 boundary , starting at the west side moving east ,
18 which starts - - follows Baseline Road at the
19 beginning of the intersection of Ashley Road and
20 Baseline , heading east to - - crossing Route 47 to
21 the section line that ' s just to the east of
22 Bristol Bay subdivision , which if we look at
23 Exhibit A , you can identify Bristol Bay
24 subdivision , so following this section line then
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 12
1 south to Galena Road , and then basically
2 following Galena Road to Orchard Road , which
3 actually goes beyond our curb boundary agreement
4 with Oswego , which was pointed out during
5 discussion last month , so the legal description
6 will be modified to stop short of that to be
7 consistent with that boundary agreement , but the
8 general alignment here is to follow Galena Road
9 to the edge of our plan .
10 I ' m going to move through some
11 of the key points of the agreement itself . We
12 get through the various titles and the legal
13 description and the real heart of this agreement
14 I believe begins in line item number 3 , which
15 starts at bottom of Page 2 of the agreement .
16 This is where we talk about
17 applying development standards , development
18 standards that would govern development in both
19 communities regardless of the jurisdiction
20 authority .
21 The development standards
22 outlined in Section 3 would be followed , so
23 whether it ' s an incorporated area on the
24 Yorkville side of the boundary or the Montgomery
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 13
1 side , each municipality would be expected to
2 follow these minimum standards .
3 These minimum standards come
4 from - - primarily come from the Yorkville
5 Comprehensive Plan guidelines , as well as the
6 Yorkville Appearance Code , so you should be
7 familiar with the majority of , better than 90
s percent , of the standards of the City here .
9 One difference is when you get
10 to density and we look at - - bear with me .
11 MR . HOLDIMAN : Page 3 .
12 MR . KRAUPNER : Page 3 .
13 MR . MILLER : The four units per acre
14 is going to be a foreign number to Yorkville .
15 This is a density standard that is a maximum
16 density for the Village of Montgomery , so as we
17 looked at density , the 2 . 25 comes from the
18 Yorkville standards as a minimum with our density
19 standards .
20 we take a gross density
21 calculation , so any time there is open space ,
22 such as right - of - way or detention basins , all
23 that is factored in . Montgomery has a different
24 formula when applying densities ; they look at
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 14
1 developable area , lot area . The inventory is
2 slightly higher .
3 The compromise that staff came
4 up with is for developments that are going to be
5 managing stormwater on- site and detention basins
6 within the development , the 2 . 25 standard would
7 be utilized .
8 For developments that utilize
9 the regional basin , which all of the area that ' s
10 undeveloped between the tributary to community
11 basin and potential stormwater there , if a
12 development is sending their stormwater there ,
13 four units per acre would be a maximum density .
14 That ' s when you take out
15 stormwater and open space , it would be four units
i
16 per acre , which is pretty low for suburban
i
17 residential development , so I just wanted to
18 point that difference out to you .
19 MR . SCHILLINGER : That would be all
20 these properties highlighted there in blue ?
21 MR . MILLER : Highlighted in blue ,
22 correct . The item number 4 , back to that
23 exhibit , Brian , the areas highlighted in blue
24 were also designated as areas where each
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
page 15
1 municipality had a joint review process .
2 It would be very similar to a
3 review ; difference being a community where this
4 falls within their municipality with the boundary
5 agreement would have the jurisdiction obviously
6 to approve the development plan .
7 However , they are agreeing by
8 the terms of this agreement not to make that
9 approval until , use the example of property that
10 falls on the east side of the line and/or on the
11 other side of the line , would have an opportunity
12 to review and provide comment before they give a
13 final decision on that development agreement .
14 Of course , we would - - staff
15 would review that and we would expect it to meet
16 the minimum standards of this agreement .
17 So that I thought personally
18 was a unique way to approach working together
19 with neighboring communities throughout the life
20 span for the next 20 years , and we will have a
21 current pulse on what ' s happening across the
22 line .
23 Item number 5 talks about
24 coordinating transportation- related improvements ,
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 16
1 This would be everything from improvements along
2 State Route 30 , which IDOT has designated
3 District 1 , IDOT has designated full intersection
4 locations along 30 .
5 The Village of Montgomery has
6 gotten approval in their long range plan from
7 District 1 . We ' re part of District 31 They have
8 shared their plans with District 1 , and those
9 plans make sense with what we are accustomed with
10 in terms of spacing , so they have identified
11 those on the exhibit .
12 It ' s so far consistent with
13 plans we have approved along Route 30 , and we
14 want to make sure as plans continue along 30 , we
15 make sure that those locations are consistent
16 with it .
17 Really the only development
18 plan left would be the Schramm property . we are
19 at a concept level . That concept plan does show
20 a connection to Route 30 . It ' s a very wide arrow
21 on a public map . When the engineering comes in ,
22 we will make sure it ' s consistent with that , is
23 the issue there .
24 Item number B talks more about
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 17
1 coordinating internal drive between developments ,
2 and just for connectivity , it is something we
3 strive within our community , as does Montgomery ,
4 so it makes sense along our borders we do the
5 same thing .
6 Other highlights , item number
7 six relates to the school district . Yorkville
8 Community School District goes into the village
9 of Montgomery and covers this territory .
10 One issue that has come about
11 just in the past year is the fact that some of
12 the preliminary - - concept and preliminary
13 development plans that Yorkville has approved , we
14 haven ' t approved one yet with the middle school
15 land dedication and we ' re beginning to paint
16 ourselves into a corner .
17 The school district has brought
18 this to our attention . we have the ability on a
19 few of the school sites that have been dedicated
20 or on the concept plan to expand those sites from
21 15 acres as necessary to a larger school , but as
22 a case -by- case , we don ' t have a crystal ball . So
23 we wanted to have something in this agreement
24 that formulates a middle school north of the
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 18
1 river .
2 It would be our hope that
3 somewhere some are developed between the two
4 communities where we can house a 25 - acre middle
5 school location . That ' s going to be contingent
6 upon and driven to a large degree by the
7 developer or group of developers that come in in
8 the area .
9 A note , item 6 is one sentence
10 that doesn ' t have a lot of teeth in it , but I
11 think the important point here is that we are
12 memorializing the fact that we need at least 30
13 acres . When we are reviewing , we can find a
14 suitable location .
15 MR . JONES : Does any of Montgomery ' s
16 plan or current jurisdiction or boundary lines
17 impact the Yorkville School District ?
18 MR . MILLER : No . No . The school
19 district boundaries would stay the same . It
20 would just be the area within the Village of
21 Montgomery would be Montgomery residents , the
22 Yorkville School District 115 does serve the
23 Village of Montgomery .
24 MR . JONES : It would serve the
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 19
1 Village of Montgomery? But then what would
2 Montgomery do as far as annexation , would they
3 gather the impact fees ?
4 MR . MILLER : They have a similar
5 land cash ordinance . We did review that with
6 staff . Yorkville ' s land cash ordinance - -
7 MR . JONES : That ' s different for
8 annexation , though .
9 MR . MILLER : Explain what you mean
10 to me .
11 MR . CROUCH : They have a similar - -
12 similar transition fee .
13 MR . JONES : That ' s what I mean ,
14 transition fee .
15 MR . CROUCH : The only difference is
16 it ' s aimed a different direction .
17 MR . JONES : What do you mean?
18 MR . CROUCH : The transition fee in
19 Yorkville is aimed at the educational costs of
20 the student up until the time the taxes are
21 collected kind of thing .
22 MR . JONES : Right .
23 MR . CROUCH : Montgomery wants it to
24 go toward buildings and bricks and mortar and all
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 20
1 - of that , so they ' ve gone a different direction in
2 terms of what their transition fee will fund , but
3 they do have a transition fee , and they are very
4 anxious at some point to have a school within the
5 Village of Montgomery that is in the Yorkville
6 School District .
7 MR . JONES : Okay . Same final
8 destination , just different way to get there .
9 MR . CROUCH : Exactly .
10 MR . MILLER : Reviewed the land cash
11 ordinance and both our Yorkville Land Cash
12 Ordinance as well as Montgomery was modeled after
13 the City of Naperville , for example , in the 70s
14 and 80s that was determined to be constitutional .
15 MR . JONES : The land cash or the
16 transition fee?
17 MR . MILLER : The land cash - -
18 MR . JONES : I was going to say .
19 MR . MILLER : - - as far as that ,
20 similar .
21 MR . JONES : Is the amount the same
22 as far as theirs ?
23 MR . CROUCH : I believe it is , but
24 I ' m not absolutely certain . I believe it is .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
I
i
Page 21
1 MR . SCHILLINGER : Everybody is
2 changing .
3 MR . JONES : But ours got bumped up .
4 MR . MILLER : It ' s 3 , 000 per unit .
5 Land use has been bumped up .
6 MR . CROUCH : But I can ' t say for
7 absolute certainty . It ' s been a while . We - - a
8 couple of years ago we went to the Village of
9 Montgomery meeting and talked to the City Council
10 and so forth and talked about exactly these
it points , and they were more than willing to as I
12 say contribute , but they made it very clear what
13 they wanted it to be for , and as I say , they were
14 very anxious to - - they asked us point blank ,
15 would you be willing to have a school within
16 Montgomery and we said absolutely .
17 MR . JONES : Right . And I don ' t have
18 a problem with that , what I want to make sure ,
19 though, is that any impact that Montgomery has on
20 Yorkville isn ' t creating any more financial
21 burden on us , I want it to be equally shared as
22 far as the transition fees .
23 MR . CROUCH : Well , we really have no
24 way to control that .
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 22
1 MR . JONES : I know , but you can
2 negotiate well upfront .
3 MR . CROUCH : I understand . I ' m just
4 saying , obviously that ' s something they can
5 change as they see fit .
6 MR . SCHILLINGER : Why don ' t you have
7 a way of controlling it if it ' s within your
8 district ?
9 MR . CROUCH : Because what ' s within
10 the school district is not within the - - under
11 the control of - -
: 12 MR . SCHILLINGER : The two boundaries
13 don ' t always - -
14 MR . CROUCH : The school district
15 does not have control over what the cities and
16 the municipalities do .
17 MR . SCHILLINGER : We can only make a
18 boundary request .
19 MR . CROUCH : We can only request .
20 MR . SCHILLINGER : And they don ' t
21 always coincide .
22 MR . CROUCH : They almost never
23 coincide .
24 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Okay . Let ' s let
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 993 - 0030
i
Page 23
1 Travis continue on .
2 MR . MILLER : The only other key
3 points here , I mentioned earlier the basin .
4 There is language in here that allows for the
5 Village of Montgomery and developments within the
i
6 Village of Montgomery to buy into the Yorkville
i
7 basin , which would be a city- owned basin ,
8 approved and currently being developed as part of
9 that , the potential basin again was designed with
10 all of this land being tributary , so if this land
11 develops into the Montgomery end of this boundary
12 agreement and it ' s feasible to convey this as an
13 advantage to Yorkville to accept the stormwater
14 for that , so we ' ve incorporated language in 8
15 that incorporates that and , of course , that would
16 have to be articulated within the development
17 agreement and we have joint review of that at the
18 time . I think we are covered as well as we can
19 be .
20 Other than that , those are
21 the - - those are my main points . I will answer
22 any questions that you or the public may have .
23 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : I ' ll solicit the
24 public . Does anybody have any questions ?
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
Page 24
1 (No Response )
2 MR . JONES : Travis , basically you
3 are happy with this document then?
4 MR . MILLER : I am comfortable
5 recommending this document , yes .
6 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Ind like to have
7 a motion to close the public hearing .
8 MR . JONES : So moved .
9 MR . CROUCH : Second .
10 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : All in favor ,
11 aye?
12 (A Chorus of Ayes )
13 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Nays ?
14 (No Response )
15 CHAIRMAN LUCIETTO : Public hearing
16 is closed . Discuss all you want .
17 (Which were all the
18 proceedings had in
19 the public hearings . )
20 - - - 000- - -
21
22
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
I
Rage 25
1 STATE OF ILLINOIS )
ss :
2 COUNTY OF LASALLE )
3
4 I , Christine M . Vitosh , a Certified
5 Shorthand Reporter , do hereby certify that I
6 reported in shorthand the proceedings had at the
7 hearing of the above - entitled cause and that the
8 foregoing Report of Proceedings , is a true ,
9 correct , and complete transcript of my shorthand
10 notes so taken at the time and place aforesaid .
11 I further certify that I am neither
12 counsel for nor related to counsel for any of the
13 parties to this suit , nor am I in any way related
14 to any of the parties to this suit , nor am I in
15 any way interested in the outcome thereof .
16 I further certify that my
17 certificate annexed hereto applies to the
18 original transcript and copies thereof , signed
19 and certified under my hand only . I assume no
20 responsibility for the accuracy of any reproduced
21 copies not made under my control or direction .
22
23
24
- 0030
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983
Page 26
1 In testimony whereof , I have
2 hereunto set my hand this day of
3 A . D . , 2007 ,
4
5
6 Christine M . Vitosh , CSR
7 CSR No . 084 - 002883
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Depo Court Reporting Service ( 630 ) 983 - 0030
United City of Yorkville
e � o
800 Game Farm Road
EST. ,� I �� 1838 Yorkville, Illinois 60560
og (N1 co Telephone: 630-553 -4350
z Fax: 630-553 -7575
PC # tJ� �
APPLICATION & PETITION
ANNEXATION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING OR SPECIAL L USE` REQUEST
L0Development Name: Letterle Date of Submission: p / 0 7
Requesting: )I Annexation 3N Zoning [I Planned Unit Development
[] Special Use:
1 . Name of Petitioner(s): Mario Letterle
Address: 4378 Eldamain Road , P[ano , IL 60545
Phone Number: ( 8151370-8645 Fax Number:
Email Address:
Relationship of Petitioner(s) to subject property:
>I Owner )p Developer [] Contract Purchaser
2. Name of holder of legal title, if different from #1 : N /A
If legal title is held in a Land Trust, list the names of all holders of any beneficial interest
therein: N / A
3. a). (i). Street address and physical location of subject property:
4378 Eldamain Road , PLano, IL 60545
(ii). Zoning of surrounding parcels:
North: R-4 General Residence District
South: A- 1 Agricultural District
East: R-2 One Family District ( Fox Hill )
West: _Special Use - Vetrenary Office
b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit "A".
c). Total Acreage: 11
d). Kendall County Parcel Number(s) of property: 02-30- 100-005 & 02-30- 100-006
e). Current Zoning Classification: A- 1 Agricultural District
f). Zoning Classification Requested: A- 1 Anrirnitural Snecia [ Use, R- 1 Flax Zoning
g). Is this property within City limits? Yes X loo, requesting annexation
Page I of 5
United City of Yorkville Annezation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06
i
4. Names and addresses of any adjoining or contiguous landowners and landowners within 500'
entitled to notice of petition under any applicable City ordinance or State Statute:
Attach a separate list and label as Exhibit "B".
x
B
5. List all governmental entities or agencies required to receive notice under Illinois law: j
6. List the Illinois Business Tax Number (IBT#) for the State of Illinois and names of businesses
located on subject property to be annexed:
7. Does a flood plain exist on the subject property?
8. Do Electors reside on the subject property? yes
If so, they must execute this petition to annex. (Electors as defined by Illinois Law is a
resident of the parcel who is a registered voter. Legal owners of the annexing parcel must
sign the petition regardless of place of residence or legal voting status.)
9. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of person to
whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed:
Daniel J . Kramer , 1107A S . Bridge St . , Yorkville IL 60560
nhdne • 553-9500 fax : 553-5764
Attorney: Name: Daniel J . Kramer
Address: 1107A S . Bridge St . , Yorkville , IL 60560
Phone Number: 553-9500 Fax Number: 553-5764
Email Address: Dkramer @dankramerlaw , com
Engineer: Name: N /A
Address:
Phone Number: Fax Number:
Email Address:
Surveyor Land Planner: Name: Phil Young & Associates
Address: 11078 South Bridge Street , Yorkville, IL 60560
Phone Number: 553- 1580 Fax Number: 553- 1685
Email Address: N / A
Page 2 of 5
United City of Yorkville Annexation,PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11/28/06
10. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary
committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project.
a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies.
b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to page 4 of this application to "Petitioner Route,
Step 1 , Fees' and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount).
c. Concept or Preliminary Site Plan: 40 sets folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope,
d. One CD containing one electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application
(complete with exhibits) and site plan.
In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and verify that to
the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct and swear that the property to be annexed is
contiguous to the United City of Yorkville.
Date: B/d- 0-7
Petitioner(s) Signature: (All legal property owners signatures must appear on this application.)
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 200 ..
Notary Seal
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED.
[t'l 1CIAL)OLLE�N ARY PUE!IC, STodJlt�ISS"vtd F�XPIRES 5� 02007
Page 3 of 5
United City of Yorkville Annexation PUD,Zoning,Special Use Application Revised: 11128/06
2,AED ciA o United City of Yorkville Memo
V T 800 Game Farm Road
EST. 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560
Telephone: 630-553-8545
�® p Fax: 630-553-3436
<LE yip?
Date: November 2, 2007
To: Plan Commission
From: Travis Miller, Community Development Director
Cc: Annette Williams, Administrative Assistant (for distribution)
Subject: PC2007-35 Letterle Property Annexation and Zoning Request
Comprehensive Plan Recommendations:
The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan for the property recommends Park/Open Space
Land Use for the majority of the property most likely due to the Rob Roy Creek
watercourse bisecting the property. The predominant land use proposed for the
surrounding areas is Suburban Residential.
In addition to satisfying open space for recreational needs, the Comprehensive Plan goal
and Objectives for Park/Open Space areas include the preservation of areas of unique
scenic or natural quality.
A common theme repeated in the Comprehensive Plan is the preservation of rural
character, respecting and enhancing natural and historical resources.
Staff Comments:
1 . The current use of the property for boarding horses and equestrian activities is
rural activity consistent with the combined recommendations of the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. Agricultural District zoning allows for Riding Academies and Stables are listed as
a Special Use. Staff recommended the petitioner to request A- I Zoning with a
Special Use to allow for the existing land use to remain on the property upon
annexation.
3 . Staff recommends the Annexation Agreement include the following provisions:
a. A requirement for the owner to reimburse the City $3,464.95 upon
annexation for the properties proportion of the cost for the Rob Roy Creek
Flood Study conducted in 2002 which benefited this property by
determining the flood plain location for the Rob Roy Creek. The
reimbursement amount is based on a $5.29/lineal foot rate calculated at the
time the study was prepared;
1
b. A provision allowing the gravel drive and parking areas to remain on the
property with a requirement to pave the segment of the driveway 25 ' from
the driveway intersection with Eldamain Road to allow for safe
ingress/egress from the property;
c. A requirement for the owner to dedicate a 60' %2 Right-of-way along
Eldamain Road to Kendall County upon annexation;
d. A provision relieving the City to provide any public utilities to the
property upon annexation;
e. A requirement for the owner to dedicate a 20' trail easement to the City
along the Eldamain Road frontage outside of the dedicated right-of-way;
f. A requirement for the owner to dedicate a 10' sanitary sewer easement
paralleling the Rob Roy Creek with a 50' construction easement for a
future sanitary line. Staff would support/recommend a provision to
require the City to prepare these easement documents at the time it is
necessary to convey.
Findings Necessary for a Zoning Amendment shall be based on the following:
a. Existing uses of property within the general area of the property in question.
b. The zoning classification of property within the general area of the property in
question.
c. The suitability of the property in question to the uses permitted under the
existing zoning classification.
d. The trend of development, if any, in the general area of the property in question,
including changes, if any, which have taken place since the day the property in
question was placed in its present zoning classification.
e. The impact that such reclassification and/or annexation will have upon traffic
and traffic conditions on said routes; the effect, if any, such reclassification and/or
annexation would have upon existing accesses to said routes; and the impact of
additional accesses as requested by the petitioner upon traffic and traffic conditions
and flow on said routes. (Ord. 1976-43, 11 -4-76)
Findings Necessary to approve a Special Use shall be based on the following:
1 . The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will not be
unreasonably detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or
general welfare.
2. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in
the immediate vicinity for the purpose already permitted, nor substantially diminish
and impair property values within the neighborhood.
2
3 . The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly
development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the
district.
4. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage or other necessary facilities have been or
are being provided.
5 . Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress so
designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets.
6. The special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable regulations of
the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may in each instance be
modified by the City Council pursuant to the recommendations of the Plan
Commission. (Ord. 1973-56A, 3-28-74)
3
°-r
i
1
I i
` e He c
LT I III I /
1 �
mx
T FAktiER rFR1
' I oL IP1PIa.T rRS1TI -
`I
^5_ a\{ v -.- .�xeoR.gor laws isawu
1 w 1. i{ ±,''•' <'I - LRaan RwonegRwaA sAYLa yq waw
'.( 1� .-.. • _1 - viRN+fl KlN o`olflY1nICOO YM1.0 icvw
JPRAH II.Lk1oRN000 AO
IM➢IfgM1hv Ntl4POdV14t0 M0.00 fY4
S �• C6gMFJtIRL 1]16 RA14
+ssA x:w
._- orsrcERasEahcxnnairewL wsA Aw
r _ � i rueuraMURwlwaq- usa iaw
• - - - - - -`- PPRFAPEHbYIXGE }AM.B Kw
ORIIIWGMEDY - -
PRtWSEDRWIffi -
PRCPon64P1AMIWG hRER 90JM.LRY -
*1 SHPOEIERMIPPlICw6RER PEA
.l'CH71YYli 1)R116N AS:UA7A115P 116(. +oRVUa.osxwoo EaurlwavcaRraMEMI
I.m Acv.b.Oiq:N...uJ.in:.]lY.mmm P9R.P4LMEi1R 9RE
fOfhLYNOYARIA iA.1GA IWOX
a[Jxe ui:! Ifl plaua._aa
[lbll..NA/I.lWf.� 1'11'�M4i f!1J[;:+ - rm e»
TM1e United City Of Yaikaille sAYa EMBE 1
•1 w1W+aJ.SEPTE1AeER W,20M
800 Game Farm Rd COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISED .2005
Yorkville,IL 60560 UNITED MY OF YORKVILLE _ __
830.553-0J50 o°'n+"`• 'm.�..xMrW"-•�':•a•..•I
ILLYYOIS �arAe-v�ase+
M M+wlery�pvYnP'9MS'a Nn wlpJ n�buyer
+
I n
♦ f �'������iiiiii iilI ii.
5 » I ? IJ'IID
� •�J'Gli�i�v �= � �
y.,rcya ,r� a
eJ .
5 .
>! ft ' �f l' �•t'
ILA
NR r
BUM INN
C
mnnmw ummuu®'
♦�g``�nuiuniii-iuun
♦ Swr�Pnunnuu�ti
1 • "'i/a ummp`r0�O�y!,
►�unus .
nun nii► ► ; :�a: ;
u�S.
lip
e
�M
p-.
.- y
ZONING ' PLAT OF
24 19 PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30 , T37N — R7E 3rd PM 4'
> AREA TO BE REZONED:
BRISTOL TOWNSHIP KENQALL GOUNTY ILLINOIS eta Acres m
2O r s«
Oil oil°° m c+ n'r-r (id 3340 Acres Excluding Road)
� ,,..,v '
PRESENT ZONING: en° = er
des
At
:,....:.: 1' ( ^ 'c>X f`tTJ ? PROPOSED 1N1Nr
f
s '
- 0.6
5 ,�
PING de IY OIIb P j f�A .r Vll S� ZN
{ �,I 4 All u,n.. t r e um ba^ p,tl "t ( F1 a eltend --
11 f 43.8 Eluunca Rcac
It 14 City Pic? rl< tins, a ns s s 546 ,,.
} p ( PIN Oir-ol 019
xr Cxunrs h f"I PIN o d0 roe-ota
Y1, x g p a,¢ ec hill.. nou: adulatory s 4eY and Lol o ? Fran
$ 1 �� •.�� "�� tvt S`w ((( cke ?Ou Net Of Sartay by glithaeff idemorta 6
1 V 1 y =` It f, f!f#2 fa I Artery Todd S % P. 166 Al
f I n.M Y 2 A5 n1ce her Montgomery,b YUb Orvds 6(15..ft, tla1eE ' 4
_ u
PINre-N DID OD( PN de B Ob M
Kim 9 nn..°o- hill °wrs N n°ml a mswu°
A- Z
stt f Location Sketctl Q _
fill �.. � ' (Not to Scale) 1
If I
_ T. C3 ;
� � i 214 .
F
PIN a e rn�e-oos
3270 1
Cl A
'Q �ft � ` f i Coo j never no
Ck: ; ( C 1� V�el f 1 213 3� i
Ell
fff !
, , bill N
hill
�9 F" \ _
hl ( f �0� SOILS {EFOm USCS Soils Edap) it
_ . . fT1
fit
212 e = "
Ol
E �� if 1 . 1
l 4 it 7X Impel, Ito
f /
j -` tf
�I ( f � [21 1 �h
t ;t j 1 1 r / ohn tl F + °m x er [ 191A 7 Rath 511 l O to Jep "t for 02-1a, PehorI
P.A ( dbINte . 1 _ R' .
/ r
A - 1 e ;i � / J J /' F`." L' - as
f X I. r u aes
In, �1 l j ' l rn�
Of
2t0 All
z On
wt- r / ;.
f
Il It lrl�ll 11.1!� ( 1. Set
`
LL
It
" t .
radical L of
w 33h 1 L318, . I — d ( L I C
t- l j l� .� y Pr o20I on H-- sinters She routinely
X j 4 want... 6 d Of Now ✓w
. 11 t l i '` "� -I v. bfld P. Rn d Spk M t Se f Utility
' - �C V V / 1 00� rate IM1 u C, Of Sul Properly
✓ $ I �' ,—�f ;: In e al / 1 I t m/ " la t 63o n'
r� �� -1�R 208 rv1. R i f Well tap at Front ril rill
✓t P az as toe ors Elevation a 62953
. xx ar-xs gdn-we Iw/r _ ra r �I c e ✓ .a.0 .
rawoat ti,�W nan I 1 F r�"+.T sttra= `� J
reer
I xNa'+rs»y a 7 I LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF TRACT TO BE REZONED
BaJ BH' a 7 IA
�20 t FU f i N F A nn
t ( t f bp ' t 3 cent f
PIN r2-30
207 Ito
f � id✓piF alC t i bd fCY4C t 9tPtoo
AN L t d if a
Il ^ .w New, III stnba we t U I h : In I G f F Hlf l o h Pont
°.' f beB t'•t 6( 415 t } he of sad f.,. ItIt Vnt
e told f 4 t Ohl
4}
n v 11 r l k r
PI C' iu W+J uOt _ tlat NI U N ii'a $P
steal Al Fan.+ .
1 .. e 2 ltA k Ve t Wlfd 1 Yestl r . -v5 "' fS
n se shy 'coo(: .
7Q� C)
66666 lIIIIIF
as G..�-,; '>
v.
o
April 5, 2007 O r;1lw
Cl United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
�+ Telephone: 630-553 -4350
Fax: 630-553 -7575
PC It
APPLICATION & PETITION
Please Check One: x Preliminary Plan
X Final Plat
Development Name: Lincoln Prairie Date of Submission:
06/22/ 2007
1 . Name of Petitioner(s):
Don u....,,.,...
Address: 6110 Route 71 , Oswego Illinois 60543
Phone Number: - ( 630 ) 554-9101 Fax Number: ( 630 ) 554-9181
Email Address:
2. a). Street address and physical location of subject property: 2624 Eldamain Road, Yorkville, Illinoi
(NE Corner of intersection of Eldamain. Road and Faxon Road)
b). Legal description of property; attach as Exhibit "A".
c). Total Acreage: 228 . 94
3. Contact Information: Name, address, phone number, fax number, and email address of
person to whom inquiries regarding this petition may be directed:
John Du an 181 S . Lincoinwayr North Aurora Illinois 60542
( 630 ) 264-7893 Phone ( 630 ) 264-1310 Fax
Attorney: Name: john Diggan
Address: 181 S . LincolnWaVy North Aurorar Illinois 60542
Phone Number: ( 630 ) 264-7893 Fax Number: ( 630 ) 264-1310
Email Address:
Page t of 8
United City of Yorkville Prelitninary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06
Continued — 3 . Contact Information
Engineer: Name: Eric Granrud
Address: 759 John Street , Yo 7i 11e , rl l Mi c ti0560
Phone Number: ( 630 ) 553-7560 Fax Number: ( 630 ) 553-7646
Email Address: egranrud @secgroupinc com
Land Planner: Name: N/A
Address: N/A
Phone Number: N/A Fax Number: N/A
Email Address:
4. Submit the following to the Deputy Clerk in order to be scheduled for the necessary
committee meetings. An incomplete submittal could delay the scheduling of your project.
a. Original application with legal description plus 40 copies.
b. Appropriate filing fee (Please refer to Page 3 of this application "Petitioner Route,
Step 1 , Fees" and/or contact the Deputy Clerk for verification of this amount).
c. To begin the review process, the initial submittal must consist of:
1 . 12 sets of Preliminary Plans /Final plats folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope
2. 7 sets of Landscape Plans folded to fit in a 10" x 13" envelope
3. 7 sets of Preliminary /Final Engineering folded to fit in a 10" x 13" enveloped.
d. One CD containing one electronic copy (pdf) of each of the signed application
(complete with exhibits), preliminary plan or final plat, landscape plans, engineering
plans.
Within one week of receipt of submittal, the Engineering Department will determine if
it is complete or if additional information is needed. Once the submittal is complete,
the Plan Council Meeting date will be scheduled for the next meeting that is 6 weeks
from this date. One week prior to your scheduled Plan Council meeting, you will be
required to submit 15 full size preliminary/final site plans for the packets distributed
to the members.
Page 2 of 8
United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised:. 1127/06
In witness whereof the following petitioner(s) have submitted this application under oath and
verify that to the best of their knowledge its contents are true and correct.
Date: 06/22/2007
Petitioner(s) Signature: (All legal property owners signatures or their authorized agents (i.e. Planner,
Petitioner's Attorney, Engineer) must appear on this application.)
Oy
Subscribed and sworn to before me this c;AaZ day of 5200 7
www�
NotaA&KOESTER
MOt#F STAtE OF 1luNOls 7 APPLICATION MUST BE NOTARIZED.
M1 NMMA6QION E»S:otl31
Page 3 of S
United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06
PRELIMINARY PLAN/FINAL PLAT
PETITIONER ROUTE
Step l : Petitioner must submit a completed application, fees* and all pertinent materials to the
Deputy Clerk a minimum of 45 days prior to the targeted Plan Commission meeting.
Petitioner is responsible for making submittals to other review agencies such as Kendall
County, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois Department of Natural
Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, etc., to allow timely review by City.
*Fees: 1 . Preliminary Plan Fee - $500/Final Plat Fee - $500
a. Engineering Review Fees - 1 .25% of the approved engineer' s estimate of cost
of all land improvements, to be determined by City Engineer.
b. Engineering Review Deposit - up to 1 acre = $ 1 ,000;
over 1 acre but not over 10 = $2,00
over 10 acres, but not over 40 = $5,000
over 40 acres, but not over 100 = $ 10,000
over 100 acres = $20,000
c. Deposit for Outside Consultants - under 2 acres = $1 ,000
2 to 10 acres = $2,500
over 10 acres = $5,000
Note: Owner/Developer will be responsible for payment of recording fees and
costs, public hearing costs including a written transcription of public
hearing and outside consultant costs (i.e. legal review, land planner,
zoning coordinator, environmental, etc.). Should Owner/Developer not
pay these fees directly, they will be responsible for reimbursing the United
City of Yorkville for the aforementioned fees and costs.
Note: You must present your plan at each of the meetings below as indicated.
Step 2: Plan Council: The Planning Council meets the 2nd and 4th Thursday of the month at
9:30 a.m. in the City Administration Office. Upon recommendation by the Plan Council,
you will move forward to the Plan Commission Meeting. Attendees to this meeting
include: City Administrator, Community Development Director, Sanitary District
Director, City Engineer, Building Department Official, Emergency Medical Rep, Public
Works Director, Executive Director of Parks and Recreation, Fire Department Rep, and
Police Chief.
Step 3: For Preliminary Plans only; Park Board Planning Meeting: The Park Board makes
recommendations on any Park Sites included in the development. The Park Board
Planning Meeting is the fourth Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at the Riverfront
Building, 301 E. Hydraulic Street.
Step 4: Plan Commission: The Plan Commission meets the second Wednesday of each month
at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Plan Commission will make a
recommendation for the City Council's consideration. The Plan Commission consists of
10 members appointed by the Mayor, the City Attorney and City Land Planner.
Page 4 of 8
United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06
Step 5 : Committee of the Whole: The Committee of the Whole meets the first and third
Tuesdays of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room at City Hall. The project
will be discussed in an informal atmosphere at the Committee of the Whole where no
formal voting takes place. This session is to discuss and consider recommendations of
prior committee meetings.
Step 6: City Council: The City Council meets the second and fourth Tuesdays of the month at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. This is where all City Council voting
takes place.
If this project has included an annexation and/or zoning petition, a Public Hearing will be
held at this time with notice given by publication. Any annexation agreement, PUD
agreement or development agreement must be signed by the Petitioner prior to being
voted on by the City Council. Prior to the recording of the final plat, the petitioner must
pay the Administration Fee. This is equal to 1 .75% of the approved engineer' s estimate
of construction costs of land improvements, including but not limited to all public
improvements to be dedicated to the City, mass earth grading, and quasi-public
improvements to be maintained by the homeowner's associations such as private storm
sewer, parking areas, and trails.
Step 8: Final Plat recording instructions: Once the final plat is approved by the City Council
and all required documents, bonds, and letters of credit are submitted to the City, the final
plat may be recorded with Kendall County. Submit the final plat mylar to the Deputy
Clerk for signatures. When all City signatures are in place, the developer or his surveyor
may take the mylar to the Kendall County Clerk for his signature. The next step is to
have six paper prints made and return to the Kendall County Recorder' s office for
recording. Kendall County requires the mylar and four paper copies. The City of
Yorkville requires that you submit two recorded paper copies to the Deputy Clerk. Any
copies you may require would be in addition to these.
Agreement:
I understand and accept all requirements, fees as outlined as well as any incurred Administrative
and Planning Consultant Fees which must be current before this project can proceed to the next
scheduled committee meeting.
Please sign and return (retaining a copy for your records) to the Deputy Clerk, United City of
Yorkville, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60.
Uw /ZZ10
Date Signature of P ' ioner
Page 5 of 8
United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06
CHECK LIST FOR PRELIMINARY PLANS
SECTION 1: WRITTEN DOCUMENTS
1 . A land use application containing the following: Not Applicable Accerptable Deficient
A. A statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the plan W7
B. A time schedule of the proposed development of the area
covered by such preliminary plan N C. Exceptions or variations to City Zoning or Subdivision
Ordinances being requested as part of the plan, including the Q
specific section of the Ordinance. —
2. A boundary survey of the area covered by such preliminary plan, X
prepared and certified by a registered Illinois surveyor. —
SECTION 2: GENERAL PLAN INFORMATION
1 . A rendered outline of the area covered by such preliminary
plan drawn at a scale of not less than 1 inch equals 100 feet.
2. The plan must contain the following information:
A. Scale
B. North Arrow
C. Original and Revised dates
D. Name and address of owner of record —
E. Name and address of site plan designer
F. Current zoning of the property
G. All categories of proposed land use —
3. The following information regarding contiguous property:
A. Location of contiguous property B. Zoning of contiguous property C. Land use of contiguous property —
4. The following site data provided in the lower right corner:
A. Size of property in square feet or acres
B. Square footage and percent of site coverage with buildings —
C. Square footage and percent of site coverage with pavement
D. Number of parking spaces to be provided —
E. Number of parking spaces required by zoning ordinance
F. Number of proposed buildings/dwelling units/lots —
SECTION 3• PLAN DATA REQUIREMENTS
I . A site location map.
2. Dimensions of the property.
3. A topographical survey of the area covered by such preliminary plan at two-foot contour intervals drawn at not
less than one inch equals one hundred feet.
4. A detailed plan for the treatment of any proposed stormwater detention or retention facilities.
5. Existing or proposed public roads, streets, and alleys, including classifications, width of right-of-way and paved
surfaces, and existing and proposed sidewalks.
6. Dimensioned building setbacks, and as applicable; areas for off-street parking, trucking maneuvering and
service, and open space/recreational facilities.
7. A schematic of existing or proposed public utility systems, including the size of sanitary sewers, storm water
lines, & streetlights.
8. Existing vegetation and plantings.
9. Any other information required by the City, to clearly show the proposed site plan elements.
Page 6 of 8
United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 127/06
CHECK LIST FOR FINAL PLANS
SECTION t : WRITTEN DOCUMENTS
1 . A land use application containing the following: Not Applicable Acceptable
Deficient
A. A statement of planning objectives to be achieved by the plan. 4A_
D. A development schedule, indicating the approximate dates for
construction of the Final Plan. —
E. Petitioners proposed covenants, restrictions, and conditions to
be established as part of the Final Plan. —
F. Exceptions or variations to City Zoning or Subdivision
Ordinances being requested as part of the Final Plan,
including the specifics of the Ordinance.
SECTION 2 : GENERAL PLAN INFORMATION
1 . Must be drawn to accurate engineering scale.
2. Must contain the following information:
A. Scale —�--B. North Arrow C. Original and Revised dates D. Name and address of owner of record
E. Name and address of site plan designer —
3. The following information regarding contiguous property:
A. Location of contiguous property B. Zoning of contiguous property C. Land use of contiguous property —
4. Site data to be provided in lower right hand corner:
A. Legal Description —
B. Size of property in square feet and acres —
C. Current Zoning D. Square footage & percent of site coverage with buildings
E. Square footage & percent of site coverage with pavement
F. Square footage & percent of site coverage with landscaping G. Number of parking spaces required by zoning ordinance
H. Number of parking spaces to be provided —
I. Number of buildings J. Number of dwelling units K. Breakdown of dwelling unit bedroom types —
5. Landscape data to be provided in lower left hand corner:
A. Number of plantings by type B. Size of plantings at installation C. On-center spacing for hedges (Should be 3 feet apart)
D. Caliper size of all trees at installation —
Page 7 of 8
United City of Yorkville Prelinanary/Finat Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06
CHECK LIST FOR FINAL PLANS, CONTINUED
SECTION 3 : PLAN DATA REQUIREMENTS
1 . Dimensions of property.
2. Existing and proposed public and private streets, right-of-ways, driveways, all principal and accessory buildings
and their uses, dimensioned building setbacks, lot sizes, sidewalks, off-street parking, service areas, open
spaces, and recreation facilities.
3. Preliminary architectural plans for all residential buildings, in sufficient detail to show basic building plan.
4. The existing and proposed vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems, indicating their inter-relationship and
proposed treatments of points of conflict.
5. Existing and proposed utility systems, including sanitary sewers, water, electric, gas, telephone, and cable
television lines, including their sizes.
6. Proposed public and private lighting systems.
7. Existing and proposed easements for utility services.
8. Proposed signage, indicating location and size.
9. Existing vegetation and plantings.
10. Proposed berming and fencing.
11 . The location and size in acres or square feet of all areas to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved as common open
space, public parks, recreational areas, school sites, and similar semi-public uses.
12. Any other information necessary to clearly show the proposed site plan elements.
Page 8 of 8
United City of Yorkville Preliminary/Final Plat Application Revised: 1/27/06
$U6IECTPRGPERTYPINS:DZ1880DO01 I&rcb RWpstiMBl Wayn FNnRt06NwW
PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION "°18300n°2 rjSECGROUP� INC.
-16'sWWS SmiNEIgIOe CO Nta •SEC AU10ma0on •SEC Planning
LINCOLN PRAIRIE FOUND PK NAIL AT OTE 60712 18- CORNER 19 Le».ss2.TSSaLmosa.TUe
OF SECnON 1e-32-J � m-lslooaas
IN PIE LOCH nON OF IRON PIPE A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 18 AND 19, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 Law. Mf oJaMJw.-Fnm'-Pal-WZWJe"a
PER DOCUMENT n-2871 EAST, OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KENDALL TOWNSHIP, S WER FnesrAY6AF9
oWNFR CAMMONWFALTx EDIS1IXi COMPHNY� J 'MO Lbw
ZQNINO:KENDIU CWMY-Ai
FWND IRON PIPE KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
iAT CQPNW
(S&9°01'2TE) AT COI?NER I ZRW PIPE >< Pa LOCATION MAP cr
S89°56'20"E 565.21' s
OWNER WMMONWE EOISION COMPANY GRAPHIC SCALE AArA
( ZONINGKENDP COUNT(.At
Go
z z i1 S� I> s- sWn/N£SIERLY UNE OF NE
�R 913 COMMONA£ALTN EDISQN !ANDS ( w F%¢T 1
88 i aT3BT) tm�n - 2Wk
C3 CA NER
7500' F.O.W. HERNFORE DEDICATED PER FWND 1" IRON PIPE
u H 00&MEN7S 200500025833 & 20050D0258J0 AT CORNER
CIAMIMY UNE OF THE I ® ^^
0 0 1 COMMQVMEAL iN mISQV LANDS tAdn UZX AGCt[E m
OWNER MENARDS INC. I I IXYIMLtar 1 LOS my -
lu u
O
zONING:LImOFPLANO-M2 � y I (SBO°04'45'0 191]G) <On e.dz
1 LOT 14W
1 n u LOT4 Tdaa
FOUND 1/2 IRON ROD - ° LOTS Skw i34
l
SW_M_UNE CF ME NORMNESi WARIER L'F $ECNQV 19-J]-] _ COT d SIlM
N0.PNI UNE OF NE SWINMEST WARlEF OF SECr/W is-J7-7 PRENWSY wTdG rzO R.OK
____ r
AT NEST WARIER CORNER M ______—_--- ------ I - C u
OF SECnm 18-37_7 TER OF SECDON 18-3]-J MAL lots AQMS asw µ
' I
FOUND 1" IRON PIPE SWNIIESIERLY UNE OF WE (NO MONUMENT FWND W SET)
FOUND 111 IRON I ♦ O� AT Cam COMMQVA£ALTH msm LWOS
AT EAST WARIER CORNER Y
OF SECOON 13-37-6
N Try
{�
10 m ZONWG'KENDA COVN<yEw510N COMPANY
O I N Na FWND RAILROAO SPIKE BWNDARY UNE
u RIGHT ON WAY UNE
AT CORNER
SDUNERLY UNE OF THE ,D LOT UNE
I COMMONAEAI.III EDISON LAN05 SET 6" DIAMETER KR BU201NG SETBACK UNE
FWND I" IRON PIPE I CONCRETE MONUMENT C 20ryNNpR
FWND WT GROSS ON UNE -__- AT CORNER AT CORNER ¢ /ry0. LAB ---_-____- EASEMENT UNE
ROAD A. \� (089°ST33'E 2]81.BT) I kOt FgE44
089°02'35"E 2781.4T
'w� `��� `\ ; >�D'•+TyN PLAT PREPARED FOR:
FIVE H,I 2 L.L.C.
8000' AQW. H DMICAIED 6 f f O ROU E If E 3
& 200.5 2587 OSWEGO, ILLINOIS 60543
eaOa R.O.W. HERCN7CF?E DEGICATED PER PHoNE: (630) 554-9101
i \ I aWUMENIS 2003oo015BU & 200500025830 i Fax: (630) 554-9181
�k I 818 I PROJECT CONTACT:
1 t,� `� (S uW vW CENIEM/NE OF BEES MA4ELF0 1 MR. DON HAMMAN
� _
ti
_ _ _ J ---
m N I W ADIE
OWNER MENAROS INC. POAD A" 1. ANNOTAnW ABBRENARMS -
ZONINGCRYOFPIANO-M2 $ K ' -�} � g
B.SL s BUILDING SETBACK UNE
°o- o , 1 AOR = POINT OF BEGINNING
1 I4 I`� rA P.U.E. m PUB CUnUIY EASEMENT
1 / BOW' R.QW. m C A SME = STORM WATER MANAGEMENT EASEMENT
ICE FWNO CUT CROSS ON UNE 1 / I HERETOFORE DEDICA ISO I w I v pp &SE =I RA6ROA0 SPUR �£NT
PER DOCUNDf7S 200500025833 E € N L
i L 5&TO I i j (xXX.XX) = RECORD &MENSM
I 1 O/y 2 IRIS PROPERTY IS WMN THE CORPORA IE UMIM OF
i I 6000' R.QW HERETCFONE DEDICATED PER r � ME ON/IED CITY OF YURKNILE AND IS ZONED M-Z.
CPIIERUNE OF ELDAMAIN ROA I DO&MEN75 200500025 & 20Q5000MC k'G
AS MAIElID 1 7500' R.QW. HERETOFORE DEDICAIED �. 1 Is IA I �'L 3 518" STEEL RWS SET O All EXIE.INOR CORNERS
O 80.00' ROW HERETOFORE DEOICAIED UNLESS OIHERWSE NOIEO. 5 18" SI£EL RWS WU-
PER 00&20075' 20550WT5833 4 . PER D=I 20(5000T58J3 I4 S
& 200.5000258.X1 Y ' BE SET AT ALL NIERIOR CORNERS WnBN 11 MWIHS
& Z00500025930 FWND RAILROAD SPIKE 41
OF RECORDAnW.
1 AT CORNER I
J i 1 ; W / / 4. DIMENSIONS ALONG &RUES ARE ARC DISTANCES
OF OWNED ulL aFNEI BRUMMEL t tlNE / UN NO DIME119016 NOTED.
ZONING:KENDAU COUxTY-A1 1 i �; ♦ O� I NOUP NGF9 FMIRO� / / /� � 6. AU HEARINGS AND ADnrMCET ME BASED ON NA
FWN) 314" IRON PIPE Y iA -n / oo,::,,••M1M1•����
i 1 t AT CORNER I SEN R5/^1' / I 84✓ :.p,. (C-PS OBSER AV MS) COORMNAIE SYSTEM EAST ZWE
1 I FWND 1 1/2" NW PIPE eQf
AT CORNER
j SET 6" DIAMETER 40.00' R.O.W. HERETOFORE DEOICA IED I I 40.0' RDEDI 1 �3K O2 / / / /
CONCRETE MONUMENT PER OO&MENIS 2005000T C0025BW HER£RIFWE DEDICATED 9
Gi REWIREMENiS PER ME UNTIED CITY ON YORKNUE
�AT CORNER PER WWMEIVIS 100500015833 513 , 7 T /
2
DWNERHILOKILSDSANNANaON ; L__ & SOQ$ 25 „ . . •'..•y j,
ZONING:KE DA COUNTY-Ai SWM UNE OF ME SWMWST WAFTER O` SFLIILW=B-J]-]
SB]°38'51'00 1813.9T (N]3° � __—_____ _ yyTir i SWIN AAR1IER3COIwIM °Q .4j P 1.1�1(4,QY I F{NFaL
OF CORNEROX ON UNE P.O.B. CENIERUNE OF FAN& ROAD88°38'24"00 1818.3Y) Qy UNE/4" TRW PIPE 28J6'yy 614.61 �y .�,1 Y�t INN I � (NO MONUMENT FWND CR SETf FIAT � 5LEO /SIGI l
I,OUN 000000.BRUMMEL FAMILYTRUST 00.6 OWNER:OLOINO NATCNPL BPNNTR55/2 )/ v ✓ %, Rye.
OWNEREUGMELMEUM „� ZONINO:KENOALLCOUMY-A1 ZONING:KENDIaLC Y-At / / / / Am 11 T StI N 9W-& M COWACT1 (.�^aN PRAAE SL601VISM
ZCMNGKEND COUNTY-At `q<( 1 R
FOUND &T CROSS 2297' S FOUND 314" IRON PIPE PETER 1 HUINKER P.E., DIRECTOR OF IAND DEVELOPMENT Tk=- LArW CITY 0.c YORK / Z
OF CWTIM & W ONE ON UNE 100.00' RAILROAD R.OW. '1Oy b/y� (630) 553-7560 KBIDALL CQUI?Y /If�l$
ALgA ER/C 1 GRANRUD P.E, PRQ/ECT MANAGER
FWND &T GROSS 34.40' S OF CORNEF & ON UNE OWNER&ALUM D.IAIW (630) 553-7560
AT THE soumCAsT CORNER OF secnm 13-37-6 zoNlrvG:KENDALLLOUxTY-At CRAIG L GUY RLS, SENIOR WRU2'YOR OREIMN BM MIE %tO.ECT NQ
IN THE LOCAnON OF IRON PIPE PER DOCUMENT 79-3897 (630) 553-7560 I. BJB O6 22 2007 OJELT4]
BERNARD J. SAUM SIT.
2 OESNtJED BY: NONZ SCALE SHEET NQ
(630) 553-7560 N A I" 200
4 o1EnTm Br. NERT. S=- i OF 6
5 CLD NIA
v
115m's Rolessvnl p¢elan F,m/iB1dM10B
PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION �SEC GROUP, INC.
Swig) Engineering Coosulfan� •SEC AubmWion SEC Planning
LINCOLN PRAIRIE
LNmoasW.IEeW f.wsssW.leae
«wM�,mrv+nmeo,w
F� A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 18 AND 19, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 LLMP. fsE Or6g¢Ro-Fno'-PM-W2007e.9
J EAST, OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KENDALL TOWNSHIP, not�s s"
-�n KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS _
AREA LOCAT70V MAP
�3 1
GRAPHIC SCALE I S89°SW20'E 565.21'
o n ,m 1 nor -99¢20' 1
2 \
( w ear 7 n 20.00' BSL
I \ \
? I 1¢00' P.UL \\
F { 2aW U.S.L. \ OWNER COMMONWEALTH EDwION COMPANY
U III \ ZONIND.KENDALL000NIY-A1
q rs•IV°
BsL s6D° rs�.� -
f0.00' P.UE \ 878
\ 9j30T�
ma I I \
00 \
a ° 1I
I \
iS00' P.UE \
\ \
III I ° o
I w=' m
I 00
���p777 20. ' B.SL
A I I to
D Im _ —
0.00' P.UE
a SWM LINE OF THE N¢RBINEST q/ARIER OF SECRON IH-J]_2 — —
4 _
18 z IW — _ — �'"TIII�\ NORRI LINE OF THE SWRINESi WARIER OF SECRON 18-JJ-] — — \v
6 — — \
p t 6
? 1 3'
7ERUNE OF ELOAMAIN ROAD
AS iRA4ELE0
LOT 1 \
1,812,998 sq.ft.
41.62 acres \
2500' R.0,W. HERETOFORE DEWCAIED PER
h I DOCUMENIS 200500025530 & 200.500025833 law, P.U.E N
m 1I . 0
W ( I \ 0No
II
2S00' BSL M..00' B.SL \ OWNEN:GOMMONWELLTIFDISIONCAMPANY
t llaw' R.¢W. HERETOFDREDEDIL'AIED \ ZONING.KFNDALLCOUNIY-At
1 PER OLCtXMENT 200.50002583)
1500' P.UE
I I 'fam 2S C0' B.SL _ LJIAI6_ RIB.LW �B \
rd �- X6 6699' 7
58903SW ]4199' ROAD A �
L'
W _ )EYPOAARY LEE. FOR
LOT2
(N89°5T98'E 2781sT)
— 666.99-- — — — — — — — — \ ao. \\\ ��\ 89°02'%'E 2781.4T�
I 4¢00' \ AS00' O
2500' B.SL
\\ IS00' RUE \\\ \ \� 20.00' B.SL F
25.00' B.SL
0.00' R.SE
N 00 \ 20.00' B.SL F
G 2500' B.SL \ ` \\ \3$. 20.00' B..SL U
° w O
I-IS00' RUE. �\\\ � 11
\\ \iS00' P.UE 10.00'1yyIII 2¢00' P.UE O
III LOTS \p \ ' � ,ILZ O
z,507,J42 ay.ft. Pe- wtME PkB.lM6VARY / FNAL
59.86 acrea 1500' P.UE' \\ " w n2
v \ `� I LOT FLAT OF $(.L7O1V/S/pV
I I 2500' R.O.W. HERETOFORE OEOICA7ED PER 2500' B.SL \ 14.00 =es L PPARE JCLM VSM,'L \ w 77-E LN7H7 CITY CF YORKVLLE
OOCUMENIB 200500025&70 & 200500015833 �\ 9. �a snsvrrz' N IU60ALL COUNTY, LNOIS
DAM.SEE SHEET NO. 5 FOR CONTINUATION RY LEE FOR N f. ae as Do] aWf7
r a< LOT 2 2 DE Mw 6M. hmN S SHEET NO.
z 1' = too'
x CNEa® Br. WflL S ' 1 2 OF 6
s C0 NA
c9
PRIELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION SEC GROUP, INC.
SmM Engineering Conscullants -SEC Aulornalim- SEC Planiting
70 Asfin Sheet yodwele.�6058D
LINCOLN PRAIRIE Int G(Irec.11560 t 520�7646
A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 18 AND 19, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 ww�MulawmWi
EAST, OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KENDALL TOWNSHIP, a6e! NLE
Aor�sr�
Sh"t 3
KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
GRAP14IC SCALE
No a " IN as
I p I
( W = )
VIA ft.
D
OWNEIL COMMONNEALTH EDISION COMPAUPr
2DOO' S.SL ZONING KENDALLCOUNlY-Al
CON� T
UM
AT CORNM
(NWST�E 2781.6r) 64406'
1000, Aur. NW07WE 27111.4r am
- - - - - - - - - - - -
— — — — — — — — — — — - - — — — — — — — am' B.&L
Q MOO
=W' RSL 00- RAMOAO SPUR EASEIADNrT
MOO, RUE
&ISMAIT
cv�
LOT 1 1000, 01. 161.62. 2am, B.&L
1,812.998 sq.ft.
4162 acres AM PAT OF SURNEIr "REPAREU ar AVe1L-N?qnF
2000 RIAMG A UAW OF OCANOST 20CU law' Iaux.
L falls'
MAW
—www I's a
100,1VAer, M001-11
DWG7&NTO`LoT2 LOT 3
1 7. f
U-2
1,292,180 sq.ft.
25,m, es–L– LOT 2 M66 acres 60.000 Raw. HE7077ZFORE DMG4GZ? plW
D�M�TS 2025000258M & 200500025�—
609.M sq.D.
law, P.U.E 2GOOo GIL 14.00 acres
MOO, aSL1 CEN71MUNE OF BEECUM ROAD
AS IRA�
.GG
2 am' A&L.
DID,
2aff' ESL 8aw, Raw. HmEwmE DwicAlED Ism Moo, RUE
L;__,� DOTLMR/m 2000002MO & 2QO!R7QO2MM HE?�F DE01"IZED f`51?
GO 15000 RUE & 2605001
4GOO, \<
4UGO
AUX. MOD, Auz IL -]VAPORAR MRNMOUND ��Mr 25OO' &SL
lam" y
– — — — — — — — — —
2&OO' RSL A.
1p Z — — — — — –
ca:�,z — - - — - - —
9�
.97��
MITI
J6' T V 51a74" – — – — – — – — – — – — –
Ip S26"W28 ROAD RAw ROAD 0A
ni!
2M7�342 sq.ft — — — — — — — — — — — — —
59.86 acres
— — — — — — — — — — — — — 93
�01
I S25-482801V B—&L Go. LOT 4 am� PUE �71 fit
Cis 115001 pu. 2.758�927 sq.ft.
63.34 acres 60.00' Raw. H&lnWoNE DaicsilEo ptw
S21l.48,28-11, DOMMIMM 20050002&L50 & 2GOSOOI
2
SEE SHEET NO. 4 FOR CONTINUATION
DErAL Oss 713WOURARY 7MV4120LAID EASBWEW AREA LOrATRON
to.L 4z — — — — ---
liemov, T�
� filarA90MT
cl� Mew
FRELA4NARY fWAL
CH- 2&58 FLAT OF SLEDAV70V
LAC� Fj2AAW SLEVA/45ION
TLE L"TED CITY Of= YORKVLIZ
KaWALL CCLATY LLIVOS
MINN Sr. OAM- IIROcEff NO.
SCALE. Iw 50' ex OSL22�W7 07OM7
Q1IsGKEV Ur. VERL J Ur 0
NIA
,y IBIrob P�Plessbid pggn Fi,mp191-0C%p
C.
rN,U
PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION SEC GROUP, IN SmllhEglRO •SEC Automation- SEC Planning
""
LINCOLN PRAIRIE �' "'°
t elnnt `"5seoea3q.ero.Taaa In
wwisegiwprcmn e,gmw�bg�¢nq,ouPlncmm
A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTIONS 18 R 19, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 ^� 0. T-ITM-nTM- -P^TPo=mss
HOi Aap
Shoet ANO
EAST, OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KENDALL TOWNSHIP, " '*°°"
KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
GRAPHIC SCALE
( w eat )
80.W' R.O.W. HERETOFORE
LOT2 DMICAIEO PER OOWMENIS SEE SHEET N0. 3 FOR CON11NUA710N t inch - too M
609.846 sq.R. 200500025630 & 2005 T 832 LOT 1
1.292,10fi s .ft 2500' &S So,
14.00 acres )S00' PU.
29.66 acre
o w
40.00. 25.00' B.SL
r* /MO�p�00 611.97_ _ _ _ T_ _ _1 _
szc 48�ze"w4°.3B• v _ ROAD 'A _ _ _ R3ROO' fig 1 569n3'sfi"w 2s1s]a' _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ _ROAD 'Am
_ _ — _ _ — _ m m
RJaOO•_ I _ _ _
"�22�- I _ L — _ — _
---n
—_ � _ — _ — _ — — _
// LT��� _ — — — — _ .T/5S9Z i 0.00' _
3320' _T\ I law, ABE
/ 526.48'28"W ��• 1 i
���
t
] .72' 2500' B.SL IawweAav TAW%SWAD FAStlIFNT III SW' BSL CENlERUNE OF BEECHER
526'48'28"w (4£ oETAx lav sl¢T JI 1 As ]RA4EiID
I BO.CO' R.O.W. HERETOFRRE
LOT 5 o'p PER PUi OF SURVEY PREPARID BYEATNIIl-HlG(5y1-IY{1 DEOICA1kU PER OOCUMENIS 2500' B.SL
2.607,342 aq.ft �/ oTp BEARING A OAS OF OCTOBER 1.; 2WJ
59.86 ac
s ry � � Ib/ I i I 1500' P.UE 1—
acres
IvI
I pH I Ii.l ) ti
p 'II it 7
III h 1 2.558,952.927 sq.ft 1500'—I 1
I
63.34 acres �}
�6NNM1WE OF 0]5015 91/R MALY I
I 60.00' R.O.W. HERETOFORE I I
i OEDlGI5E0 PER 005000255
1 I 2500' B.SL li ZW.5OW25830 & 200500025B13
I100' P.aE I I
BO.00' R.O.W. HERE50FOR£ OEO/CARD I 1 1 J I
F— I
PER OOWMENT 20050W258JJ ;
2500' B.SL I r I ) I l l I 20.00' B.SL 5224 /
IS00' Pu I I >41
10.001 Aux
4aW 4Q00 ttE r W..00'
I'cml Iln `YI I OF BURONCTOV NORRIERNE
1 u 1 I SANTA FE RAU ROAD
sao0•
II Oy;05• �
II CENIERW OF FAXON ROAD I 229�t p2 )
I 40.00' R.RW. HERE O ORE 5j3.23 N �9z/ D /
1500 P.UE OEBICARDPEROOWM E ksl QAIIp /
I I T500' B.SL 200.500025630 & 200590025833 ��
204.97 2500' BSL _/ IB 1 m /
s M LAE OF ME SW B1t1E5T WARTE? OF SECRON 18-J]_]__ 19 /
236.86' _ - NORM UNE OF ME NGRBBVE WWARIER CF SECRW 19-T1-> �i / u� ?
�— S87°3w51^N t8 13.9T \\\ / AREA LOf.GTIO1l MdP
588°38'24'W 1818.32') 4RW' R.0.W. HERETOFORE �F \ 20.00�B.SL / /
( DEDICATED PER OOMMFNIS N]4° ��^RJ \ \moo' P�.RE y
200500025810 & 2005aW IA+]a 8 '•W 518.611
$14.807 9513
50.00' /
PRELA04ARY / FTVQL
PLAT OF SLEaVISIIXV
LAC UN PRARE aWIVOM
7FE LN7ED CRY OF Y100; ln�
/ KBIDALL CCII.lVTY, Rl/tfOIS
RFA90X5 OR a Sr. BALE PRO.ECT NR
I. B.B 08 ] 01034]
2 i O VhilO BM NORR SCALE Siff ! NR
1 NA 1" 100'
4 rail k9 BM WtL SCALE 4 OF 6
s a NA
Know ra)e.aomi ors§nrx„a leamotoe
PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION SEC GROUP, INC.
q
LINCOLN PRAIRIE Sm mEginceri gC e.IL6M -SEC ANa a0on •SEC Planning
L 551.]lm f.QOS WAG
seWaiVhcam enAreem9®ee7j,d @Immm
A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST, OF awv. rue o]aM2w.-ma-vmo-wxnze.o
THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KENDALL TOWNSHIP, a°r Rscbww/m
' KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS Z
0
SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR CONTINUATION \ c=rriM i
I=
\\ \ L fA SW;6..WT
F AQAr LOCaTK.W MAP
GRAPHIC SCALE I \\ ��\ �� jsanm•�zw_rc�.n O
L ime -.i0a11L 1 1500' P.U.£. \
O
rnrn I
{+r 1 I I 1500' P.UE \ Z it
\ U
Q WI(M R.O.W. HERETOFORE \ \ \ I =
I DED/CRIED P£B DOLUMENrS
200.5 15830 t 2005000255)3 \\ W
_
O I \a �o��Rh3 c�
us0' nA'OD"
N I I 526IB'28°W �36' - -
T12
3320'
/�•1`l�J / 46''1818 W
ST6I818'W
sf
1 LOT n i
CEN]£RUNE CF E/DAMAIN ROAD 2,60],342 N.H.
59.86 acres
/p/ al0 /m
I
� SIN I
1 I
7500' R.O.W. HERE1 ME
OEDICA]ED PER DOCUMEN]5 I 1
1 200500025930 d: 200.500025313 I I I
II I
m , II � t
Z
I , I
1
W.D0' F.O.W. B£RERN'CB£ I a
DEDkMIED PER DOMMEN]S
O I I 200500025930 d 200.5000258A I I 1 I Z
F-
11� I 0
A 1 1 2500' O
z 1 I 1500' P.OE—I (� I I W
g I I qI �N i I z
� I Iii I i1 W
W I I II I ��u I III
I of w
a
1 1 1500' P.U.F. DEDCARB PER DOCU
2005 25530 h 200.500025933
-I 2500' B.SL CENh,PUNE d" FAXON ROAD \ I I \
I I \ 2500' 3SL )500' P.UE — _ — — — — - - \
SW1N UNE OF WE SWMNEST BUAR]ER OF BECTON 18-3>-> — 20ABY- —
� �_
I l -- — Fsixoti. ROAO
T� _-_"-� - - - r - ,515.,2
L SBT°30'51RN 1813.9T
y ' (SM-3924VI 1816.32) FKELA4NARY FIn1AL
z r3 FLAT OF ,S( MVL9ON
1
2A 3'
i LMUN APAR2E &A5LNVfSM
77-E L1V7® CITY OF YOOK'> F
KHIDALL COLMY, LLTXNS
PEnN01i5 I MW IM I DATE PRQEOr NO.
r. B.B 06 2007 0]0.34)
2 DESIGNm BY: I Nd8Z SCALE Sl E N0
_ .
i
MIA = 100'
A GIEq® Btt 1KNT. SCALE 5 OF 6
5 CLD N A
CP
nsw.PMmlwPl omen N,m A A m cool oe
SEC GROUP, INC.
PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION Smith En�gineenng ConsulbnLs-SEC AUtomatlon• SEC Planning
TM L s « v� a>i[Aw
LINCOLN PRAIRIE
La]a5S9.]56a YGa lll-
NaVS%gWry'w¢m e,yiiundy��yiai06wvm
IINP. N£ Ol(U/]-P Fod Rot-(*XVZO
A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST, OF PPLLOMT LOPSS7ANOAKO
THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KENDALL TOWNSHIP,
ONERRS mrmm'iF KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)55 A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO WC AMERIRCIL NICOR,
COUNTY OF 1 COM ED, COMCAST, OTHER PUBLIC UTUTES AND HOLDERS OF EVSTNG FRANCHISES GRANTED BY M£
THIS IS TO CERTIFY MAT THE UNDERSGNED IS (ARE) iFIE OHNERS (V• M£ GN OF YORKVILLE. ELINOIS AND NOR RESP£CAVf SUCCESSORS AND ASSGNS MTHW ME AREAS
SHOW ON WE PLAT AS 'PUBLIC UnLITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENY (abbroAdW P.U. & BE) M
PROPERTY DESCRIBED ON ME ATTACHED PIAT AND HAS (HAVE) CAUSED ME CITY MOWS C£RTOCATE CONSTRUCT, INSTALL, RECONSTRUCT REPAIR. REMOVE REPLACE INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND OPERATE
SAME TO BE SURV£IID, SUBDIVIDED AND PUTTED AS SHORN BY ME PLAT CITYLITY O[N!N/fI�TIOI'Ag UNDERGRWNO WANWISSq! AND D/SMIBUTW SYSTEMS AND LINES UNDER ME SURFACE OF WE
FOR ME PURPOSES AS WDIC4T£D MEWON. AND DOES HEREBY AG NOMT£DCE STAR" OF l/LNOIS ) 'PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT• INCLUDING MMWT UMITATW M RIEPHWE CABLE, GAS
AND ADOPT ME SAME UNDER ME STYLE AND ARE WMEGN INDICATED. STATE OF ILLINOIS ) }£S MAINS ELECTRIC LINES CABLE RT£N➢0.V LINES AND ALL NECESSARY FACILITIES APPURTENANT
WE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY DEDICATES FOR PUBLIC USE ME LANDS SHONE ON )SS CIX/NTY OF KENDALL) NEREN, wsaf ER MIN N£ RIGHT OF ACCESS WERM FOR WE PERSONNEL AND EWIPMENt
MlS PLAT FOR MLNOUGNFAF£$ SMEEM ALLEYS AND PUBLIC BERM= AND COUNTY GN KENDALL) NECESSARY AND REQUIRED FOR SUCH USES AND PURPOSES AND TOGETHER WIN WE RICHT W
HEREBY ALSO RESERVES FOR ANY ELECT/C, CAS TELEPHONE CABLE N OR APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY WE MAYOR AND CITY CWNGL OF WE UNITED CITY INSTALL REWIRED SERVICE CONNECTIONS UNDER NE SURFACE OF EACH LOT TO SERVE IMPROVEMENTS
OWER 1£LEOWMUNIGTWS COMPANY UNDER OM TELEPH NE CABLE MM ME APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY ME MAYOR AND CITY CWNOL OF WE UNTIED OF Y WLLE IWN04 BY ORDINANCE NO. MEREON.
UNITED CItt OF YDRKE[[£, NOR ANY UNDER
AND ASSIGNS ME EASEMENT LTTY OD YOR WVI /[LOUIS MIS DAY OF 2W� AT A MEETNG HELD WIS _ DAY W 200
A NW-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT IS ALSO HEREBY RESERVED FOR AND GRANTED TO WE UNITED CITY OF
PROMS'ONS WIW ARE STAND HEREGN YORKWU& ILLINOIS N CONSTRUCT, INSTALL, RECONSTUCT, REPAIR REMOVE REPLACE AND INSPECT
WE UNDERSIGNED NRMER CERTRES MAT ALL OF ME LAND INCLUDED IN MATOR CITY CLERK FACLIDES FOR ME MANWISSIW AND DISTRIBUTGN OF WARP, STORM SENERS SANITARY SEERS
MIS PLAT LIES N9N/N WE BOUNDARIES OF ttMKN(lE COMMUNITY SCWOq. AND ELECTRICITY, WHIN WE AREAS SHORN ON ME PLAT AS 'PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE
DISTRICT 115. EASESAMT7. TOGETHER LAIN A RIGHT W ACCESS MER£TD FOR ME PERSONNEL AND EOUIPMENT
NECESSARY AND REQUIRED FOR SUCH USES AND PURPOSES
MNESS MY (OHR) HAND AND SEAL. AT WE ABOVE NAMED ENTRES ARE HEREBY GRANITE ME RIGHT TO ENTER UPON EASEMENTS HER➢N
MIS DAY OF 200 ON ApNNISIRATMS CERINICAIE tlN Ow NFFR5 C➢RWICAW DESCRIBED FOR NE USES H£REN SET FORW AND ME RIGHT TO CUT, HIM, OR REMOVE ANY WOM
SHRUBS OR OMER PLANTS MMIN ME AREAS DESIGNATED AS 'PUBLIC UTUTY AND DRAINAGE
OWNER (PRINTED NAME) OMNER (PRINTED NAME) STATE W ILLMIS ) STATE W ILLINOIS ) E4S5RWr MIIW INTERFERE ATM RAE CONSTRUCTION. INSTALLATION R£CWSWUCDGN, REPAIR,
REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND OPERA PONT OF MEIR UNDERGROUND TRANSMI551W AND
CWNN OF KIMBALL) CWNTY W I WSMISUBON SYSTEMS AND FAGUTES APPURINANT THERETO. NO PERMANENT BUILDINGS
STRUCTURES OR OBSTROCNOAS SHALL BE CWSMUCTED W. UPON. OR OVER ANY AREAS DESIGNATED
NOTARY LYRTET:AW APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY WE CITY AOMINISMAILIT [LP WE UNITED CITY W I, JOE WYMROT pN ENGINEER FOR ME UNITED CITY OF YgMALE DO AS TUBIIC UTILITY IT DRAINAGE EA5EMENY, BUT SUCH AREAS MAY BE USED FOR GARDENS SHRUBS
YORKVILLE, 1WHO6, MIS _ DAY OF 100 HEREBY CERTIFY MAT WE REWIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED OR TREES LANDSCAPING, DRIVEWAYS AND OTHER RELATED PURPOSES MAT 00 NOT UNREASONABLY
STATE OF ILLINOIS ) WE REWIRED WARANT£E CCLLARRAL HAS BEEN POSTED FOR ME INTERFERE MM WE USES HERON DESCRIBED.
)SS COMPLETION W' ALL REWIRED IMPROVEMENTS ME OWUPATION AND USE OF WE NON-EXC.US?W EASEMENT HEREON GRANTED AND RESERVED FOR
COUNTY OF 1 CITY AOMIN/SMATCR
DA RD AT YLMK4l1E. ILLINOIS WFS _ DAY W NO ABOVE NAMED ENTITIES BY EACH OF EOC ENTITIES SHALL BE DONE IN SUER A MANNER SO AS
NOT TO INTERFERE N TS OR WANIEE AN O ESERWOV AND USE HEREOF RE OTHER VIVIFIES FOR
A
Wf�NOTARY EBl/C W AND RR Mf STATE AND 2W� EASO SUCH EA.4 E AN ARE GRANTED AND RESERVED. THE IN SUCH G AND MANNER SO AS NO SAID
COUNTY AFORESAID, HER®Y CERTIFY MAT INTERFERE E FERE BY NE ABOVE NAMED ENTITIES SHALL BE DONE IN SUCH A MANNER SO AS NOT TO
AND PERSONALLY KNOW N ME N BE ME SAME �, u /�W � yTR pry OypNE11l INTERFERE MIN, DAMAGE TS gS WDA ANY EANSIIISAON AND OISTMWDOR SYSTEMS AND FAMPES
OR
PERSON(S)
RUMEN APPIt NAME(S)
BE O (ARE) SUBSCRIBED TO IL FDR£COING APPURTENANT THERETO EASEMENTS MMIN ME ABOVE NAMED BONG CROSSED OR RECROSSED. NO USE OR
INSTRUMENT, APPEARED BEFORE T AND DAY AND AIC INSI MEN THE BRADT O I OF SAID EASEMENTS BY NE ABOVE NAMED ENARR SHALL CAUSE ANY CHANGE IN
USES AM OF M£ ANNEXED PLAT AND AS HIS (MAR) FREE FOR AND
STATE W l(LNgS ) ONSIDE OR IMPAIR OR WANGE ME SURFACE DRAINAGE PATTERNS
USES AND ERPOSES HERON SET FTtRTH AS NIS (HER)(N/ER) FREE MLL AND COUNTY OF KENOALL)) /XXp�ry ATR FOLLOWS ANY HORK TO BE PERFORMED BY NE UN/RD CITY OF YORKNLLE IN ME EKERCY OF In
EHUNTARY ACT.
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED BY WE PLAN COMMISSION OF WE UNITED CITY OF EASEMENT RKNIS HERON GRANTED, SAID NOT SHALL HAVE NO OEARM. MN RESPECT AI
OVEN UNDER NY HAND AND N010R/AL SEAL MIS DAY OF YDRKVILLE, ILLINOIS MIS _ DAY OF 200 STATE OF ILLINOIS SURFACE TENT CURB. INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WE RESOARATOA; REPAIR M F SAID 1W� ) OF PAVEMENT, ATIT WTRRS TREES LA IN OR SHRUBBERY, PROVIDED, HAND MO NAT SAID CTY
)SS S/ALL BE O AS TO , FAIN iNG LE D AA/AIENANC£ MONK, TO BACKFILL
AS AND OR O ALL E15 MENCH
COUNTY OF KENDALL) CIREARD 50 AS 10 RETAIN WITAB(E RAU AND M , AN M L ANY ME HALT OR CONCRETE
NOTARY PUBLIC GIAIRMAN SURFACE, ]O REMOVE ALL EXCESS DEBRIS AND SPo14 AND ID LEAVE NE MAINIENANC£ AREA IN A
A. COUNTY CLERK
DRANW NT KENDALL
GENV CWNII: IILNOIS GENERALLY CLEAN AND NDRIO/ANLIKE CONDITION.
00 HEREBY CERTIFY MAT MERE ARE NO DELINWENT GENERAL TAXES NO
SIJRWvlRls cv?IwcA I" SA CURRENT TAXES NO UNPAID D AMMULD TA YES AND NO REDEEMABLE
IYYAVTY�S CfTT(!TF
TAX SALES AGAINST ANY I THE LAND WCUDED IN ME PLAT HEREIN DRAW.
STAR' OF ILLINOIS � STATE OF I[LNgS ) l NRTHER CERTIFY MAT / HAVE HERON DRAM ALL STANT0.RY F£ES IN A D OMERLUSVE ETY WINE FOR SERVING OM SUICADOON
)�, CONNECTER MN NE PLAT AL ORAMN. IS''HEH�`'`�WO FOR AND GRANTED N MMUNICAnON SERVICE
COUNTY OF KENDALL ) COUNTY OF KENDALL) gYOV UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF THE COUNTY CLERK AT YORXNLLE
MIS IS N CERTIFY MAT I, CRAIG L CITY, ILLINOIS PROF OAAL LAND ACCEP7E0 AND APPROVED THIS _ DAY OF 2W� ILLINOIS MIS DAY OF 100 COMMWM£ALM EDISON COMPANY, AMEN/TECH ILLINOIS a.Xm ILLINOIS BELL TOEPHWE COMPANY,
SURWYOR NO 35-1158, AT Nf REDEar OF ME OMNER(S) THEREOF, HAVE GRANTEES
SURVEYED AND PLATTED ME FOIEOMNC DESCRIBED PROPMN. COUNTY CLERK THOR RESPECTIVE LICENSEES SUCL£SSONS AND AMIGVS JINNRY AND SEVERALLY TO CONSTRUCT,
MAT PARR q' SECTIONS 1B AND 19, IN BRISTOL NMNSHIP. DESCRIBED AS KENDAL CWNTY ENGINEER OPERATE REPAIR, MAINTAIN MWIFY, RECWSMUCT, REPLACE SUPPLEMENT, RELOCATE AND REMOVE FRON
MALOMS OF S ME SWMIN B CORNER GN ME SOUNNEST THE N SALE P0.'ES WM AMMQS WR£S CABLES CONDUNS MANHOLES 7RMW RMERS PEDESTALS
WATERS OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 18, EST CON 3l F WE RANGE ] EAST [N' EGAIPMENT CABINETS OR OTHER FACILITIES USED IN CONNECTION MW UNDERGRWND TRANSMISSION AND
THE LAIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN THENCE NORM 00 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 52 anDRIBUTIGN OF ELECTRICITY, OJMMUNICA RONS SOUNDS AND SIGNALS IN, OVER. UNDER, ACROSS ALONG
SECONDS REST. ALONG THE HEST LINE OF NORTH
S 0 DEGREES WAFTER, TES 52 AND UPON WE SURFACE OF WE PROPERTY SHONE WHIN ME DASHED OR DOTTED LINES (ar slnAar
FEET N ME SILO NEBT OWNER IN SAID SWMNEST WARIER THENCE Jeaignotian) W WE PLAT AND MARKED 'EASRENY, 'UTILITY EASEMENT' 'PUBLIC UTUTY EASEMENY,
CONTINUING NORM W DEGREES 55 MINUTES 52 SECONDS NEST, ALONG ME RECOMIER5 CERTIFICATE T.U.E.' (w aLnTar BeMgnoHim). TH£ PROPERTY DESGNAIID W THE DECUIRATIW OF CWOWIN/UM
HEST LINE OF ME NORMMEST WARIER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECNOV 14 /
AND [OWN/S PUT AS OWMW EPROPERTY AND ME IPRCN M PLAT rOED W WE PLAT AS
MISO FEET, M . SOUTHERLY LINE D NE SNOB NV ES 0) S COM STALE OF IWNOO 'COMMON AREA OR AREAS'. AND A/E PROPERTY WE NS NE PLAT ED STREETS AND ALLEYS
ALONG SAID SWI; THENCE SWN ID DEGREES 56 A/INLNES ZO SECONDS EAST. ) MIEMER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE iOCEMER HIM ON RIGHT N INSTALL REWIRED SERVICE CGNNELTWS
ALONG SAN SOU ES 29 LINE O SAID LINOS G&M21
WE FEET; THENCE SWN 60 � UNDER WE SURFACE W EACH M LOT AND COMMON AREA OR AREAS 10 SERIF /ORROV OW MOM OR
SAID LA 11 MINUI£S T8 , INE EAST. ALONG THE ES MN6ITRLY LINE O/' COUNTY W KENOALL) RO ADJACENT LOTS AND COMMON AREA OR AREAS WE RIGHT TO WT, TRIM OR REMOVE TREES EBHES
SAID ADS EA EAST, FFEi,' HENCE SOUTH OD DEGREES 39 MINUTES W ROOM SAPLINGS AND N INCIDENT OBSTRUCTIONS FROM THE EFFACE AND SUBSURFACE FR MAY BE
PONT O EAST, ALONG WE F SAID N LINE OF SAID LANDS 191.81 EEEi, N A MIS RECORDERS QFH Na- WAS N MI FOR RECORD IN WE REASONABLY REWIRED INGOENT !O THE RIWIB F/ER➢N OVEN, AND WE RIGHT N EVILER UPON WE
PANT ON THE SOUTH LIME GN SAID AST AL ST WATERER: THENCE BERM 23 RECORDERS OFF)LE 20 KENDALL COUNTY ttLNgS W MIS _ DAY OF EBOINDER PROPERTY FDR ALL ON PURPOSES PRNATE OWHRN WE DASHED NOT BE PLACED OVER
DECREES 57 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST, ALONG WE S 02 MINUTES LINE OF 2W. AT O'G.00K _.M. GRANTEES' FApLIAR OR IN UAW GD 04ER ME PROPERTY IMNIN ME DASHED OR DOCK DOTMD U TY (or
SAID LANDS 610.50 FEET.' AUHLE NORM 89 SAID LA 01 MINUTES J6 sInS EeslgnkU.E W N£ PLAT AND MARRED HOHT WE OR WI IEN CENT; TOF IN UIILOY
SECONDS EAST, ALONG WE SOUTHERLY LINE W SAID LANDS 2181.47 FEET ro EASEMENT; LLAWN OF MY S E FA U IN MWE DE PR/OR SI BUIV CONSENT OF AIE ALL NOT
ME EAST LINE CU NE NEST HALE OF WE NORTHEAST WARIER OF SAND NENOALL CWNN RECORDER AFTER D IN A MANN R ANY SCI DERFERE3. WE (NAPE OF THE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTY SHALL NOT F-
EAST ALONG L SECUON
SAID 1d THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES O MINUTES 17 SECONDS ALIERm IN A MANNER 50 AS 10 WIFRFERE MM ME PROPER MERA]!ON AND MAINTENANCE THERE(Y:
EAST ALONG SAID £AST LINE NWM FEET SO ]FY NORMNESIEWE RIGHT Of'
WAY LINES NE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE SAID N00T HENCE SOUTH
]J DEGREES 2J MINUTES W SECGNOS NEST, ALONG SAID NORNNESTERLY WE tERN OGAMW EL➢A£N>5' SHALL HAVE THE MEANING SEt FORM FOP SUCH TERM W ME
NEW OD WAY LINE DEGREES FEET, TO ME CENTERLINE ES FAXW ROAD;
'CONUOA/Mw.vvrzOPmTYaCTn plAPi£R 785 2C5 60.5/1 AS AMENDED FROM THE N TIME.
HENCE NORM 74 DELINEATE 4.T MINUTES 56 SECONDS NEST, ALONG SAID
CENTERLINE 51801 FEET NNE SOUTH LINE OP SAID DEGREES T WARIER NE )ERN 'CIMMGN AREA OR AREAS IS DEON£D AS A [OT, PARCEL OR AREA OF ME BFI/ PROPERT;
OF SAID FlRACT ALONG G ME 18; THENCE SWN 8] DEGREES Je MINUTES 51 SEE BEATELY O USE AND ENJOYMENT W AREAS IS RESERVED IN MHq£ M. AS N APP N THOUGH AC WE
SECONDS NEST, ALONG BE SWN LINE OF SAID SWNMSt WAFTER, 1B119J SEPARABLY OVINE LOT$ PARCELS M AREAS Y T N IS PLANNED D T.01r, ENT, EVEN MWGN , w
CON NI SAID POINT W BEGINNING ALL IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS MAYBE ONERMBE DESIGNATED W THE PLAT BY TERMS SUM AS OUROTS' 'COMMON ELEMENTS' 'OPEN
CONTAINING 12894 ALTER MORE OR LESS SPACE; OPEN AREA; OWMW C-ROUND; TAREAL PROPERTY AND 'COMMON AREA' IN IEOR Ofil MMTS AREA
WR AREAS AND 'COMMON RE AL MO' INWUOE REAL CWR SURFACED MTH INTERIOR DRIVEWAYS AND
I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT ME PLAT HEREON DRAW IS A CORRECT AND WALKWAYS, BUT EXCLUDES REAL PROPERTY PHYSICALL Y OCCUPIED BY A BUILDING SERENE BUSYNESS
ARE SIO REPRESENTATION CR SAID SURI£Y AND EBDINSW. ALL DISTANCES DISTRICT OR SIECNRR SUCH AS A POOL, R£i£NTGN POND OR MEGNAN/LAL EWIPMENi.
ARE SHONE IN E£Et AND DECIMALS HEREOF.
WITTE TIRE OF FACLITR MLL BE DONE BY GRANTEES AT CWT OF ME QRANRM/LOT ONNER, UPON
I FURTHER CERTIFY MAT L. PART A THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ? BY WE IS XWITT➢E NEWEST.
LOCATED MEIN A SPECIAL. FLOW AGENCY AREA AS RRMFlEO NI THE
F£D£RAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY BASED ON ➢ED N ZONE AR
DATED .ALLY 1S 1982 ALL W THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE G AREAS
OF MINIMAL EZWgNG
I RAINIER 091 MAT I HAVE SET ALL SUBDIMSION MONUMENTS AND QY FTVAL
DESCRIBED WEM ON MIS RNAL PLOT AS REWARD BY ME P r ACT (?WMn PLAT CP 5LEDR45ON
REVISED STANTES 19". p/APMR 109, SECTION 1).
I NRMER CERnF THAT NE PROPERTY SHOMN ON THE PLAT HEREON DM4W LAC UN PRAIPE 5LMV&0N
IS SKATED MTRN WE CORPORATE LIMITS OF WE UNITED CITY OF MRKELLE NOACE- TFE LA17w CfTY OF YORYVLI.E
ILLINOIS WIW IS EXERO'S IC ME SPECAL POMEFS AUMORIZED BY DIESGN KENDALL COUNTY HAS A LONG MW MANSION IN ACRIWLNRE AND A�MpAIJLL Cowry LLho
l2 OF ARTICLE 11 OF ME ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL CODE AS AMEMAD. RESPECTS WE ROLE nUT FARMING CWTNUES N PLAY IN SHAPING WE
ECGMARC VIABILITY OF ME COIINTY. PROPERTY MAT SUPPORTS MIS AVIV ORAYR! BM OAIF: PROJECT N0.
OVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL AT 4LINOIS MIS INDUSTRY IS INDICATED BY A ZPV/NC INDICATOR A-1 OR AG SPECIAL USE
DAY OF 2W_ ANYONE CCJSIMCANG A RESIDENCE OR FACILITY NEAR MIS ZONING SHWII H 1. B.B W 7 0]LTT41
BE AWARE THAT NORMAL AGRIWLiUR£ PRACTICES MAY RFSLT IN I OESI1 1PP. HOWL MAIE: SHEET N0.
OWASWAL SAELLS DUST. SIGHTS NOISE. AND UNIWE HOURS OF 1 NIA N/A
ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL LAND SLAAWAM, NO. OPERATW MAT ARE NOT OPICAL IN OMFR JWIlM. ARRAS w tl1ECl6.D BY: WRL SOME B OF 6
LICENSE EXPIRES 11/30/2008.
K CLD NIA
clrf� United City of Yorkville Memo
800 Game Farm Road
Esr 1836 Yorkville, Illinois 60560
` Telephone: 630-553-8545
Fax: 630-553-3436
�CE �VV
Date: December 5, 2007
To: Plan Commission
From: Travis Miller, Community Development Director
Cc: Annette Williams, Administrative Assistant (for distribution)
Subject: PC2007-27 Lincoln Prairie Preliminary and Final Plat Request
Background:
Lincoln Prairie annexation agreement was approved May 24, 2005 and recorded August
29, 2005 and provides for M-2 Zoning Classification.
Staff Comments
Engineering Comments:
See Bill Dunn, EEI report attached.
Dunn recommends items of report be addressed and plans re-submitted for review
prior to approval.
Landscape Plan Comments:
1) At the permanent entrance on Eldamain, street trees are required on both sides of
the road. Landscaping is also required in the center median.
2) The hatching pattern for the seed mixes shall be shown under the appropriate seed
list.
3) The NWL and HWL shall be indicated on the plans.
4) Include a detail of the erosion control blanket, which shall be specified for any
slope to be seeded with native seed.
5) The design shows a retention basin, with a 3 ' wide band of `detention basin wet
prairie mix' seed along the water's edge. The perimeter of the basin shall be
seeded to the 641 elevation line or the HWL, whichever is greater, with the wet
prairie mix.
6) Label the `stone' hatching pattern near the Swale entrance to the basin, as well as
the graphic at the beginning of the gravel hatching pattern (several of these are
shown on the plans).
7) Proposed fence shall be included in landscape plans for approval.
1
8) Show any parking lot or security lighting on site.
9) Sidewalk is not indicated along "Road A", engineering plans show sidewalk on
both sides of the road. Sidewalk shall be shown on the landscape plan to verify
there are no conflicts with proposed street tree locations.
10) The November 21 , 2007 cost estimate should be amended to include the correct
species (consistent with plan), and also include mulch, soil amendments, and
erosion control blanket costs in the estimate. Shade trees should be estimated at
no less than $350.00 each to purchase and install.
2
52 Wheeler Road • Sugar Grove, IL 60554
TEL: 630 / 466.93SO
FAX; 630 / 466.9380
www.eeiweb.com
Enginaaring
Enterpris®s,
Inc,
December 5, 2007
Mr. Joseph A. Wywrot, P. E.
City Engineer
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
Re: Lincoln Prairie Asphalt Plant
Healy Asphalt Company, L.L. C.
Final Engineering/Final PlatlStormwater Management Report Review
United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois
Dear Mr. Wywrot:
We have reviewed the following documents related to the proposed Lincoln
Prairie Asphalt Plant/Healy Asphalt Company, L.L. C. development:
• Final Engineering Plans for Healy Plant — Lincoln Prairie prepared by
Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. consisting of 23 sheets dated
November 21 , 2007.
• Preliminary / Final Plat of Subdivision — Lincoln Prairie Subdivision
prepared by SEC Group, Inc. consisting of six (6) sheets with latest
revision date of November 21 , 2007.
• Stormwater Management Report for Healy Plant — Lincoln Prairie
prepared by Smith Engineering Consultants, Inc. revised November
21 F2007
• Response letter from Smith Engineering Consultants dated November 21 ,
2007.
Consulting Engineers Specializing in Civil Engineering and Land Surveying
Mr. Joseph A. Wywrot, PE
December 5, 2007
Page 2 of 7
Our review of these materials is to generally determine the plan's compliance
with City of Yorkville ordinances and whether the improvements will conform to
existing City systems and equipment. This review and our comments do not
relieve the designer from his duties to conform to all required codes, regulations,
and acceptable standards of engineering practice. Engineering Enterprises,
Inc. 's review is not intended as an in-depth quality assurance review. We cannot
and do not assume responsibility for design errors or omissions in the plans. Our
comments are as follows:
GENERAL
1 . A copy of the Natural Resource Information (NRI) Report by the Kendall
County Soil and Water Conservation District should be filed with the City.
2. Permits or Sign-offs will be required from the following agencies:
a. (IDNR) Consultation Agency Action Report regarding
endangered/threatened species or natural areas.
b. (IHPA) regarding preservation of cultural resources.
c. Kendall County Health Department regarding the well and septic.
d. (IEPA) Division of Water Pollution Control regarding a Notice of Intent
(NOI) General permit to discharge storm water.
e. Kendall County Highway Department regarding proposed
improvements in the Eldamain Road Right-of-Way. {A letter from the
County Highway Department is on Mel
3. An agricultural field tile survey should be performed and the results
submitted for review.
4. A copy of the soils report for this project should be submitted for review.
5. A wetland delineation report has been submitted confirming the presence of
wetlands on the subject parcel. The report indicates that for each wetland
area there is no "clear hydrologic connection with Waters of the U.S. The
final jurisdictional determination will be made by the Army Corps of
Engineers (Rock Island District). Mitigation of wetlands could become an
issue on this project depending upon this jurisdictional determination. The
design engineer should forward copies of the ACOE determination to the
City upon receipt.
GAPub11MYo&vi11e\200MY00503 Hammann-Eldamain Road\domVwywr0t04.doc
Mr. Joseph A. Wywrot, PE
December 5, 2007
Page 3 of 7
SPECIFICATIONS. GENERAL NOTES & TYPICAL SECTIONS
6. Public sidewalks should be provided on each side of Road "Aa between
Eldamain Road and Sta. 104+02 in accordance with City Standards.
7. The heavy-duty pavement section should specify the use of Amoco 4551
geotextile fabric or equal over the compacted subgrade.
OVERALL PLAN
8. The note regarding the connection of the 12-inch RCP outfall to the 15-inch
drain tile should be deleted.
SITE & UTILITY PLAN
9. Recent groundwater studies from this area suggest that the groundwater
gradient is generally from northeast to southwest. These findings lead to a
recommendation to avoid locating sources of potential groundwater
contamination north or east of a potable well, particularly a shallow
groundwater well.
10. Based on the observations in comment #7, we recommend the relocation of
the gasoline and diesel fuel storage tanks to a location that is down gradient
with respect to the proposed well site. The design of the fuel storage and
containment facilities falls under the jurisdiction of the Fire Protection District.
We recommend that plan review of this facility by the Fire Protection District
be encouraged early in this process. The review of the three 35,000-gallon
liquid asphaltic cement (AC) vessels proposed for this site would also fall
under Fire Protection District jurisdiction.
11 . The design engineer should identify in the plans what standards are being
used in the design and construction of the above mentioned fuel and asphalt
storage tanks.
12. A mechanical system for. handling sanitary flows that includes a seepage
field and tank is proposed for the same area as the fuel storage. The design
engineer should include details as to the design and capacity of the
proposed system within the plans. Similar to the concerns voiced in the
comment regarding fuel storage, there are also concerns with this sanitary
facility being immediately up gradient of the proposed potable shallow well.
Inasmuch as the private well and sanitary system approval falls under the
jurisdiction of the Kendall County Health Department, we recommend that
plans and specifications be submitted for Health Department review as early
as possible. Copies of Health Department reviews and approvals should be
directed to the City.
GAPub1iclYOrkv111e120051YOO503 Hammann-Eldamain Road1d005'4WyWrOtO4.dO
Mr. Joseph A. Wywrot, PE
December 5, 2007
Page 4 of 7
13. The crushing operations and material storage areas are positioned such that
stormwater runoff from the processing and storage areas will sheet drain
untreated directly into the stormwater management basin (wet). We strongly
encourage the incorporation of additional Best Management Practices
(BMP'S) to pretreat this runoff before entering the pond. The developer
should provide aggressive measures to protect the shallow sand and gravel
aquifer which is a renewable source of potable water for both private and
municipal wells in the area.
GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN
14. The future roadway improvements (Road "A") will require significant
regrading and drainage improvements in the north half of the right-of-way.
15. Stormwater easements should be provided for all off-site stormwater facilities
(Sediment Basin "A" and stormwater seepage field).
16. Details for the seepage field design should be included in the plans.
17. The general site grading calls for sheeting drainage at 0.50% throughout
much of the site. Inasmuch as most of the open areas are designated for
material storage, likely in the form of stockpiles and material bins, we believe
surface drainage may become a problem on this site. We recommend that
more detail be provided to illustrate the proposed use of these areas and the
probable locations of stockpiles, etc. so that more detailed drainage patterns
can be defined. We further recommend that grades be increased wherever
possible in order the avoid drainage issues.
ELDAMAIN MEDIAN — ENTRANCE PLAN & PROFILE
18. On Sheets 8 and 9 the median at the west end of Road "A" falls within two
different types of hatching. These two types of hatching should be explained
as they do not appear to conform to the hatch legend.
19. Increased runoff from additional pavement on Eldamain Road is undetained
and should be directed to an on-site stormwater facility.
INTERSECTION DETAIL
20. The one street light symbol shown in the boulevard median fails to identify
the mast arm configuration. There should be an indication as to whether this
unit will have a single mast arm or a twin mast arm. If single, will it be
extended over Eldamain or over one of the Road "A" lanes? The detail for
the pole and luminaire on Sheet 17 indicates that the pole intended is that
specified for residential streets. It is our opinion that the proper pole and
luminaire should be that specified for collector roadway design.
GAPub1iclYorkvi11et2005\Y00503 Hammann-Eldamain RoadldomftywrotW.doc
Mr. Joseph A. Wywrot, PE
December 5, 2007
Page 5 of 7
DETAILS
21 . The 10' Path Section should include the requirement of geotextile fabric
between the subgrade and the aggregate base course.
22. The curb and gutter details should indicate the requirement for continuous
reinforcement (2 - #4 deformed bars 12 inches apart and 3 inches above the
bottom).
DETAILED CROSS-SECTIONS
23. The Typical Cross-Section thru Retention Basin (XS-4) should be revised to
show a maximum slope of 5: 1 between the 100-year HWL and the normal
water level. (SHEET 14)
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
24. The United City of Yorkville's Stormwater Ordinance does not provide design
specifications for the infiltration of stormwater. Of late, our office and City
staff members have researched the various issues surrounding the design of
infiltration basins and have identified certain principles that should be
considered in the design of this site. The proposed system on this site
combines the elements of a traditional retention basin and stormwater
infiltration. This site has the added complications of proposed heavy
industrial use and the existence of a shallow sand and gravel aquifer that
must be protected. The comments provided below use what we have
learned about the infiltration basins contemplated at other locations within
the City and attempts to balance those concepts with the intended use and
stormwater design found in this application.
25. Given its proposed industrial use, it is expected that there will be significant
levels of suspended solids in stormwater runoff from this site. The
recommended treatment for this type of runoff would be to provide a forebay
to settle out solids prior to cleansing through vegetated wetland areas or
bioswales. These pretreated flows would then be introduced to the retention
pond. Understanding that it may be challenging to provide the optimum
pretreatment on the subject site, we recommend that the design engineer
develop viable options for settling out solids and cleansing contaminants
prior to the introduction of stormwater runoff into the pond and infiltration
field. Anticipating high levels of particulate matter from the crushing
operations and the handling of stockpiled materials, it will be important to
design BMP's that are sustainable and maintainable. The design engineer
should provide a recommended schedule for the maintenance of any BMP's
or facilities that will be sensitive to accumulations of sand, screenings, silts,
asphalt grindings, etc. Maintenance responsibility for BMP's and stormwater
GAPubRc\Yorkv111et2005\Y00503 Hammann-Eldamain RoaftoWkywrot04.doc
Mr. Joseph A. Wywrot, PE
December 5, 2007
Page 6 of 7
management areas should be clearly established within the annexation
agreement or development agreement.
26. The engineer should provide the maximum possible separation between
inflows into the pond and its outfall. Structure #218 is too close to outfall
structure #100. Greater separation should be provide.
27. It should be noted that the use of the seepage field may not be an
appropriate BMP. If the groundwater table elevation is greater than the
invert of the seepage field, it may cause groundwater contamination from the
interaction between the runoff water and the groundwater. It is
recommended that the bottom of the seepage field be a minimum of 4' above
the seasonally high groundwater table. The use of this BMP will be reviewed
once the soil boring report and final seepage field design are submitted .
28. The stormwater design implies that the retention pond will be lined. The
design engineer should confirm this requirement and indicate the method
proposed for the lining of the pond.
29. The Zero Release HEC-1 model indicates that the peak water elevation of
the basin is 644.57 . Due to this result, the overflow weir curtain wall should
be placed at an elevation of least 644.6, for the interim condition.
30. The Engineer should revise the storm sewer calculations to include the pipe
run 224 to 204.
PRELIMINARY/ FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION
31 . Provisions for the Ingress Egress Easement should be provided at final
platting.
32. Provisions for the Railroad Spur Easement should be provided at final
platting.
33. A note should be provided on the final plat stating when the temporary I. E. E.
and the Temporary Turnaround Easements will expire.
34. If the railroad spur easement has been granted and recorded, the document
number needs to be shown. If it has not, then it should be granted on the
final plat. {The design engineer as indicated the intent to comply with items
#28 through #31 at the preparation of final plat}
CONCLUSION
We recommend that each of the comments issued above be addressed and that
revised final engineering plans and supporting documents be submitted for
G:Tublifforkvillet2005WO0503 Hammann-Eldamain RoadXdocallwywrot04.doc
Mr. Joseph A. Wywrot, PE
December 5, 2007
Page 7 of 7
review prior to approval. If you have any questions or need additional
information please contact our office.
Sincerely,
ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES, INC.
William E. Dunn, P. E.
Senior Project Manager
pc: Brendan McLaughlin, City Administrator
Travis Miller, Community Development Director
Charlie Wunder, Urban Planner
Annette Williams, Administrative Assistant
Eric Granrud, SEC
John Duggan, Attorney
JWF, TNP, AJT, DRM - EEI
GAPublicWorkville12 OW00503 Hammann-Eldamain Road\doc9Mwywrot04.doc
J�•��° c�r` T Memorandum
a
Esr. rsas To : Travis Miller, Community Development Director
From: Laura Haake, City Park Designer
04 CC: Annette Williams, Joe Wywrot, Anna Kurtzman, Bill Dunn
�wxt" O Date: December 3, 2007
�dat
<l6 ev Subject: Healy Asphalt Plant at Lincoln Prairie Landscape Plan
I have reviewed the preliminary landscape plan for Healy Asphalt Plant & Lincoln Prairie dated
June 22, 2007 with revisions dated November 21 , 2007, prepared by SEC Planning Consultants
and have prepared the following comments:
General Comments:
1) At the permanent entrance on Eldamain, street trees are required on both sides of the
road. Landscaping is also required in the center median.
2) The hatching pattern for the seed mixes shall be shown under the appropriate seed list.
3) The NWL and H WL shall be indicated on the plans.
4) Include a detail of the erosion control blanket, which shall be specified for any slope to
be seeded with native seed.
5) The design shows a retention basin, with a 3 ' wide band of `detention basin wet prairie
mix' seed along the water's edge. The perimeter of the basin shall be seeded to the 641
elevation line or the HWL, whichever is greater, with the wet prairie mix.
6) Label the `stone' hatching pattern near the Swale entrance to the basin, as well as the
graphic at the beginning of the gravel hatching pattern (several of these are shown on the
plans).
7) Proposed fence shall be included in landscape plans for approval.
8) Show any parking lot or security lighting on site.
9) Sidewalk is not indicated along "Road A", engineering plans show sidewalk on both
sides of the road. Sidewalk shall be shown on the landscape plan to verify there are no
conflicts with proposed street tree locations.
Re-submittal of plans is required for approval.
C/py Memorandum
a
1836
EST. To: Travis Miller, Community Development Director
,
From: Laura Haake, City Park Designer
y CC: Annette Williams, Joe Wywrot, Anna Kurtzman, Bill Dunn
9 (� '�O Date: December 3, 2007
XmOiCeui.N
�Gj<CE �? Subject: Healy Asphalt Plant at Lincoln Prairie Cost Estimate
I have reviewed the preliminary landscape plan for Healy Asphalt Plant & Lincoln Prairie dated
November 21 , 2007, prepared by SEC Planning Consultants and the cost estimate submitted does
not reflect the most current landscape plans.
Please re-submit with correct species, and also include mulch, soil amendments, and erosion
control blanket costs in the estimate. Shade trees should be estimated at no less than $350.00
each to purchase and install.
Memorandum
DRAFT
EST , 1836 To: Plan Council and Plan Commission Members
From: Annette Williams
0 b y
Date: December 4,2007
Subject: Submittal deadlines
E \\.
Please see petitioners' submittal deadlines for the 2008 Plan Commission meetings.
PI. Commission Submittal
Dates Deadline
Wednesday January 2, 2008 Friday November 16, 2007
Wednesday February 13, 2008 Friday December 28, 2007
Wednesday March 12, 2008 Friday January 25, 2008
Wednesday April 9, 2008 Friday February 22, 2008
Wednesday May 14, 2008 Friday March 28, 2008
Wednesday June 11, 2008 Friday April 25, 2008
Wednesday July 9, 2008 Friday May 23, 2008
Wednesday August 13, 2008 Friday June 27, 2008
Wednesday September 10, 2008 Friday July 25, 2008
Wednesday October 8, 2008 Friday August 22, 2008
Wednesday November 12, 2008 Friday September 26, 2008
Wednesday December 10,2008 Friday October 24, 2008
Wednesday January 14, 2009 Friday November 28, 2008
Planning Commission Consortium
Yorkville Public Library
November 15, 2007
Attendees:
Anne Lucietto, Chair Yorkville Plan Com. Travis Miller, Yorkville Comm. Dev.
Charles Wunder, Yorkville Planner Stephanie Boettcher, Yorkville Sr. Planner
Stephanie Sheetz, Conservation Foundation Dan Lobbes, Conservation Foundation
Richard Scheffrahn, Yorkville Fagade Com. Sandy Bell, Big Rock
Jim Brownlee, Village of Minooka Glen Schieberl, Village of Minooka
Betty Langeland, Village of Plattville Margaret Sheehan, Village of Oswego
Doug Kissel, Village of Millington Chet Zmarzlanski, Village of Plattville
June McCord, Village of Plattville Robyn Suteliff, Yorkville alderwoman
Valerie Burd, Yorkville Mayor Paul Bard, Yorkville resident
Jerry Dudgeon, Kend. Co. Building/Zoning Jerry Friel, Plattville Mayor
Jerry Tokars, Big Rock John Hegeler, Yorkville Plan Com.
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by Anne Lucietto, Plan Commission
Chairwoman from the United City of Yorkville. Welcomes and introductions of the
speakers, Stephanie Sheetz and Dan Lobbes, from the Conservation Foundation, were
made.
Ms. Sheetz thanked the group for the invitation and shared that The Conservation
Foundation's goal is to preserve natural areas and open space, protect rivers and
watersheds, and act as stewards of the environment. The Conservation Foundation has
4500 members and works with public agencies, private landowners and local
environmental groups.
Conservation easements are legal agreements that permanently restrict the amount and
type of development on a property, tailored to the land' s character and specific to what
each landowner desires. These easements are monitored and enforced by public
agencies. Landowners may qualify for income tax deductions, reduced property taxes
and reduced estate taxes.
Easements are used: 1 ) to preserve habitats or species; 2) provide access for outdoor or
recreation education; 3) must be identified in the Ill. Natural Area Inventory; 4) be part of
a local, state or federal policy to conserve, restore and protect wildlife or scenic areas;
5) must be monitored by a nonprofit land conservation agency.
Deed restrictions, as pointed out by Mr. Lobbes, are not monitored regularly and do not
require land stewardship. A conservation easement is a separately recorded document,
referenced on the plat and any entity cannot hold a conservation easement on land it
owns. Two funds must be established for good project management: 1) one for
monitoring and enforcing the project, including legal fees, which the developer is
encouraged, up front, to give the entity; and 2) management of ongoing funds by the
Home Owners Association, and secondly, with a dormant back-up SSA. It was urged by
Mr. Lobbes, that any easement management plan be implemented by a contractual
agreement, determined for as many as 5 years, to qualified companies.
Plan commissions can be involved by evaluating which tool is appropriate for their
community, relevant to the development, and involving The Conservation Foundation
with educational issues, as needed.
Ms. Lucietto asked those in attendance if they had questions. The following are
information items, discussed by Ms. Sheetz and Mr. Lobbes; 1 ) the HOA has specifically
designated accounts which keep monies for upkeep by the contractual agency;
2) landowners receive a benefit of more control, ultimately, for the use of their property,
even though by including an easement the overall price of the property may be lower;
3) Mr. Lobbes stressed the importance of the dormant SSA's, as a funding and
management mechanism that is always available, but are put in place by the Villages;
4) the minimum area of a conservation easement is not regulated, as long as it meets all
the criteria; 5) a conservation easement can be added after an annexation is completed, if
the commitment is attainable by all parties; 6) The Conservation Foundation holds the
maintenance contract and executes it, with the by-laws of the HOA establishing the
easement documentation and establishing the funding.
The next Planning Commission Consortium meeting is scheduled for Thursday, January
24, 2008 at the Yorkville Library. The topic will be historic preservation. Anyone
interested in hosting a meeting or suggesting speakers is encouraged to contact Ms.
Lucietto.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 pm.
Minutes submitted by Annette Williams
r
t
IF I I If 1, 11111�1 ii , IF ., ., . ,
LHE
'rg CONSERVATION
ri FOUNDATION
l mbGrhM(9i2
L
Conservation Easements
and Developments
4
r H
i
F'1111 _1 r ' 3 4 =' ,
IF
s ' t , rt, 3
IF Illy.9
�,..F r
t:
fIF If ,
WIC i �
If
IF Ile,
I If Fly;
IF
lily f f { t " � j III I
IF
le-s Ile
, i t t k Fee
i ai{ ! t a ilk s 3 Y 4 r P �'Y.IF FFiy IF ylyl ,
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
The Agenda
t# TR'4k
l„
A
n • Who are we ?
• What are we talking about?
• Why is it important?
e
• What are some examples ?
7nkrr�
• What can a Plan Commissioner do ?
Ja :Js
f
� P
f � af4
i
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
m � C )M1lf 2111 .F
About Us
• Mission: To preserve natural areas and open space ,
protect rivers and watersheds , and promote stewardship
of our environment.
• Supported by over 4,500 members
• Active in northeastern Illinois since 1972
• 10 full-time and 2 part- time professional staff in 2
locations
• The Conservation Foundation (TCF) is part of network
of land conservation organizations (12 +/- in Chicago
vP
region)
� � • Wt, ork with pubhq, 11agenqie$, private landowners and local
environmental' gaups
i
I 3
t t
tt4i '. P
6 s
" � s t,.
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Open Space " Tool Box"
Ae
5
• Acquisitions
.rt4k�{ A gg
i✓n!Aµ � MY Tsi ��ii
• Land donations
1
A
r
• Bargain sales
• Conservation easements
s r
a� ✓Pr
'61rr,-
rv4" o-
b
tY ��
i
t
t
Sl t Itl � rr
}li
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
t .
Conservation Easements
• Specific term: legal agreement between a
landowner and public agency or non- profit
conservation group that pemmnently restricts the
amount and type of development on a property
• Tailored to the character of the land
• Leaves land in private ownership - could be sold,
transferred, inherited - all subject to easement
r
• Easements are nv itm& and enjmwd by public
L
agencies a conservation organizations
F
) f F
c
r
w
{ 2 F x
J ! E F
st FF + f t Lt fl )
3 ii^ F
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Conservation Easements ( cont. )
• Put in place to preserve land in private
� ownership
• Landowners who uiurnardy restrict their
property may qualify for:
- Income tax deductions
- Reduced property taxes
Reduced estate taxes
f J N Xt
• Conservation easements in developments
don't qual 14 1 1.f or tax ber of its
i Yt
.4. 3tf 5 Af . A i f
ee
t, P
Y f
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Its a powerful tool !
8'xl' P4P#:
• Recorded on the deed
• " Runs with the land"
• Lasts forever
• Requires stewardship of natural
resources
J sty, • Is monitored and enforced by either
ur;fi a public agency or not- for- profit
" land conservation organization
t4 f , E r i
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
When should the
t, y be used ?
a
• Preserve habitat for endangered or threatened species
• Contribute to the ecological viability of a park or
b ` natural area that is public owned or otherwise protected
• Provide for public access for recreation or outdoor
education
• Be identified in the Illinois Natural Areas Inventory
• Be part of a local, state or federal policy or plan to
" conserve wildlife habitat or open space , restore or
' `F r protect lakes and streams , or protect scenic areas .
, • Public agency or nonprofit land conservation org, is
able and zlling to accept the responsibility for
monitoring and enforc ng the ` asement.
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
err
What about deed restrictions ?
• Recorded on the deed
• Prohibit land being sold for purposes other
than those permitted
• Not monitored or enforced on regular basis
• Don't require stewardship of land
" ' • Courts can reduce protection or terminate
restrictions based on economic hardship or
�b
" ' i aracti ab' 't withouf �i 6g ,4 nd to public benefit.
Y � ; P
s
t t
+. . , ,.. p .. e
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
1" is protection im ortant?
y p
• Qualityof life !
k
- Scenic
- Recreational
- Psychological
- Spiritual
• Econonuc value !
- Clean water and clean air at a low cost
- Reduce flooding
Homes within 600 feet of managed natural areas
get 19 . 1% premium over similar homes elsewhere
a3
• Bottom lhne : Preserving natural
t
resources is good f !
j S
(4
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
What s the Easement Process ,
6 vfw4
• Never too early!
- Part of annexation agreement
- Included in preliminary plans
• Decisions :
- Who owns the land?
- What restrictions need to be put in place ?
- Who monitors and enforces the easement?
- Who manages the land?
:Howas all Phis furided?
Ia
6
\$° CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
i
Owners Can Vary
c� r ` p
" It Really Depends )
ft � Y De en p )
• Public ownership (preferred)
- Municipal or county
- Park or Forest Preserve
- State
• Private ownership
- Homeowners Association
r - Individual
� Jy 5 Y✓6�%'p 1 f
Conservation CJrganization
fI 5 1 t t
1411 ,
t f9 E .
d
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Be sure i '
z,
ure t s a real
C 31t[:: \ JV`ti
Conservation Easement
• Separately recorded document - reference that
on the plat.
• Independent third party with enforcement power
• An entity cannot hold a conservation easement
on land it owns - whether that's a municipality,
r � `� j� sf�?
conservation organization or HOA
J
„r
�e
J r�
A J .
1 1F
s � x
aJ , c .
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
w*. aaa i ua
Elements of a Good Project
• Municipal interest
- Interest in success
- Annexation agreement addresses restoration and long-
term management
- Recorded easement
- Separate funding for easement management
r
• Long- term view
Endowment for legal defense (required)
s - Funding for on- going ecological management
(regLUred
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Funding
• Endowment for legal defense (required)
� - Upfront, by developer
- Determined by development size, complexity & risk.
- We put principal in a restricted fund to ensure its availability for
legal enforcement actions , should they be necessary.
We use the interest for regular monitoring expenses .
• Funding for on- going ecological management (required)
- Must be separate (cannot be lumped with HOA funds to plow,
etc)
� - Must be guaranteed source of funding (SSA, HOA & DSSA, etc .)
forever is a very long tune !
° - Helps with our expense to administer ecological contracts .
' F08 s e ucation efforts about ecological stewardship.
rJ It r ;
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Why Education .
• N'Iinimize easement violations
• Encourage volunteerism
• Ensure residents know who to contact
• Build trust and awareness by helping
.
ensure there are no surprises
m {x Gr, fp# p.
t
f
J d :
1
µ CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Model Project
a, • High quality natural resources on property
• Project designed around natural resources
• Municipality asks TCF to hold easement & to
oversee long- term management
• Easement and natural resource protection
referenced in annexation agreement
• Guaranteed funding source established
JF r • Developer does initial restoration
•
Developer establishes endowment and creates
4 P
mechanism ar on going ;funding
le
R.
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
£ n ,
Typical Project
• Local government reviews pro) ect (annexation,
zoning, platting, etc )
• Developer needs to obtain wetland permit from
Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE)
• ACOE requires restoration, conservation
easement and long- term management
r jt • Developer contacts TCF , then throws a fit
because of required endowment and management
F„ �e fees ,
111 4
na
1 S i
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Case Studies
9 ( J\vi:? 1 171iN
V? ?U:VO4; 10'v
z .
• What can we learn from previous
projects ?
• Examples of restricted or permitted
uses in a conservation easement .
IN"k
r i '
t �
i
s „
.in
FCONSERVATION EASEMENT � EVELOPnMENTS
? {y0
� l
, h4 � � Yy R'y 'n IrtY � X15 "tx xc � Nix rl ?rnb
r .
II
inh i * Fs
y ti q>
b
m
✓h tax p n �an v r .,'�
1
HY
Ns
t� xt r ^ iy �� +a .�G ti sao i,� �'°,., � 4 � • 4 ' -„a�.
R7,F�f' I” 7Jtl � j
h ta � &� wm r r�J• ' � '
Site Plan � ,l
s t f s N�'" r ✓' - ' aeq �
h iin- ; s �, , .h'', r . ` basement Areas
! � , Chatham r
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Who ' s Involved ?
ffllwmm� 9/14
su
R • Village of Carpentersville 4q KRPENTEnMLLE
ILUNOIS
k
• Pulte Homes If ;
• Christopher Burke Engineering
• Applied Ecological Services
T ' ITT
t
IT
IT
• The Conservation Foundation
' 13y1 '
' \ x
nl �F THE
-
IT
r CONSERVATION Kl
r „ „
FOUNDATION
r ' ,
sea � �
� CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
, i Our Roles at Winchester Glen
A • Monitor and enforce the conservation
easement
• Ecological manager of the Preserve
A
.0 3s
a bw ib J s ti
r
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Well Done v.
Ut1` i'2 1 U;i
j ` ` - • The Village required someone to oversee the
management of the natural areas
. Maintain and enhance ecological functions
- Look pleasing
. Preserve property values
•
Specially, designated funds as part of Homeowners
Association fees , with backup SSA
• Qualified, experienced contractors
f sr • Education and P
P artici ation funded
• Preserve evaluated and new management plan
every 5 years (part of funciug)
1
t ri . , _
5 a
F 1 y ia1
i
OW
Ie
wm hN 4 3
AAA mv
0 1A
ele
Iv
Iel
V
r:
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Just Not Right
ICr[ VPi 7V
• Wrong tool used
�. - Few natural resources preserved
- Significant alteration of the land (" natural areas "
created)
- Annual monitoring not necessary
• Wrong organization as Grantee
- HOA not qualified to hold easement
- Holder of easement cannot be landowner - it's a
x « f conflict of interest!
` � • Document language ineffective
Allows easy xt
eingi shment of easement
Tr
i r
b funding pravidecl , fay anything
ri £ a s i s
t i
3
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
0 How Can Plan Commissions
{ Be Involved ?
• Evaluate what tool is appropriate to
development you are reviewing .
• Involve TCF in educating or helping
with issues , as appropriate .
x
tall " t
CONSERVATION EASEMENTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
Discussion & Questions
p Contact Information:
�r
Dan Lobbes , Dimaor of Land Praerzurtion
Stephanie Sheetz, Land Use/Open Space Planning
Manager
2550 Dickson Road
Montgomery, IL 60538
Phone : (630) 553 - 0687
f"Miry {,�1t5
Uj
Land Preservation Website Resources
Scenic America
http://www.scenic.org/easements/strategies
Scenic America is a national 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated solely to
preserving and enhancing the visual character of America's communities and
countryside.
The Trust for Public Land
http://www.tpi.org/tier2 rl.cfm?folder id=588
The Trust for Public Land has a regional website for Chicago area and lists some
projects/news articles related to land preservation in the area
The Land Trust Alliance
hftp://www.Ita.org/index.shtml
The Land Trust Alliance is an organization which promotes voluntary private
conservation of land. A Chicago Office of the Midwest Region of the Land Trust
Alliance is in Evanston, IL.
American Farmland Trust
http://www.farmland.org/
hftp://www.farm[and.or-q/programs/states/il/defauIt.asp
http://www farmland orq/programs/states/documents/KendaIIFPOrdinance.pdf
The American Farmland Trust is a national organization with branches in each
state. The Mission of the American Farmland Trust is to "save the land which
sustains us." Kendall County was highlighted on the Illinois State webpage
(listed above) for their Farmland Protection Ordinance, which can be accessed
through the website given above.
The OpenLands Project
http://www.openlands.org/
An independent, non-profit organization designed to help preserve and protect
public open space in Northeastern Illinois.
Protect Kendall Now
http://www.protectkendalinow.org
Produced an Open Space and Natural Areas Plan and are now currently
contacting landowners with the many opportunities for protecting their lands.
Campaign for Sensible Growth
http://www.growingsensibly.org
A coalition of leaders in northeastern Illinois (Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake,
McHenry, Will Counties) working to promote economic development while
preserving open space
Example Design Guidelines
http://wupcenter.mtu.edu/education/land use/design guidelines/
Design Guidelines prepared for the Upper Peninsula Michigan
Rural Character Preservation Program
http://www.pikepa.org/Planning/SRCP.htm
Scenic Rural Character Preservation Board established by Pike County, PA
established through the Pike County Comprehensive Plan.
Natural Areas Flowchart
Does the land contain Is all or part of the land Is all or part of the land in a Are any
THREATENED Is all or part of the land relatively ndisturbed
identified on a federal, located along a y OPEN SPACE or Neither a
or state, county or local NATURAL NATURAL AREAS
RIVER or STREAM NO going NO CONSERVATION
TRAIL CONDITION oin to be
ENDANGERED NQ NQ or does it contain or does it contain
GREENWAY or MAINTAINED or
SPECIES HIGH QUALITY ISOLATED EASEMENT
OPEN SPACE � CREATED
or is an INAI SITE? PLAN? WETLANDS . WETLANDS? by this development?
nor a
O NOTE: Public ownership o o 0 0 DEED RESTRICTION
(i.e., the Forest Preserve O O
District) is recommended is
for a "Yes" in either of Is the land A necessary.
these two categories. ADJACENT to or in C�
CLOSE PROXIMITY J'
to HIGH QUALITY
NATURAL AREA or
PROTECTED
PROPERTY?
Is the land with
�O 0
conservation value it �� A
SUFFICIENT SIZE J,
A YES so that its conservation DEED likely to
R.E IuMAIN INTACT RESTRICTION
CONSERVATION even if Would development activity on a required .
ADJACENT LAND this part of the property NQ is
EASEMENT is developed? THREATEN the
CONSERVATION VALUE
is required . yES of the
ADJACENT or NEARBY
NATURAL AREA or r
PROTECTED PROPERTY?
The Conservation Foundation
11kim
(630) 428-4500 0 UI6.
CONSERVATION
www.theconservationfoutidation.org FOUNDATION
Land Preservation Options
There is a growing trend among developers in metropolitan Chicago to build on lands
previously discarded as"problem" areas. These properties may include wetlands, streams,
hydric soils or other natural features that make them difficult to build on easily. As fewer and
fewer of the"easier"pieces remain, developers are increasingly choosing to work with lands
that have conservation value. In addition, more municipalities and county governments are
wanting to protect the natural values of these properties in order to stave off flooding or poor
water quality and to maintain the quality of life in the area.
Conservation easements are being used more frequently in Illinois to protect the conservation
values of properties while keeping them in private ownership. There are certain criteria that a
property must meet in order to qualify for an easement, specified in Illinois' Real Property
Conservation Rights Act(765 ILCS 120/0.01 et seq.).
Conservation Easements Restrictive Covenants
• Enacted to protect and provide for public • Frequently part of development
benefit communities
• Land remains in private ownership • Restricts usage of land
• Used to protect important natural resources • May include management plan
• Use restrictions and management plan • Monitored by homeowners association
specified in easement document • Enforcement: neighbors vs. neighbors
• Recorded with the County
• Perpetual; runs with the land Deed restrictions
• Assignable by grantee if necessary • Put in place when transferring
• Monitored and enforced by a public agency ownership
or private, not-for-profit land conservation • May include management plan
organization • Recorded with the County
• Funding needed for adequate monitoring • Monitored by the grantor,the County
and enforcement and the title insurance companies
• Validated by courts throughout U.S. • Enforcement: court system. Courts
• Qualification criteria: can reduce protection or terminate
— Preserve habitat for endangered or restrictions based on economic
threatened species hardship or impracticability without
— Contribute to the ecological viability regard to public benefit.
of another park or natural area that is
public owned or otherwise protected
— Provide for public access for recreation
or outdoor education
— Be identified in the Illinois Natural
Areas Inventory
— Be part of a local, state or federal
policy or plan to conserve wildlife
habitat or open space,restore or protect For more information,
lakes and streams,or protect scenic
areas. please call Dan Lobbes at
(630) 428-4500 x55
Chicago Region Land Conservation Organizations
Barrington Hills Conservation Trust Citizens for Conservation
17 Oakdene Road East 459 West Highway 22
Barrington Hills IL 60010 Barrington, IL 60010
(847) 381 -4291 (847) 382-SAVE
CorLands Fox Valley Land Foundation
25 E. Washington St., Suite 1650 6N203 IL Rt. 25
Chicago IL 60602 P.O. Box 3118
(312) 863-6272 St. Charles, IL 60174
(630) 513-6368
Geneva Lake Conservancy Jo Daviess Conservation Foundation
398 Mill Street 126 N. Main Street
P.O. Box 588 P.O. Box 216
Fontana, WI 53125 Elizabeth, IL 61028
(262) 275-5700 (815) 858-9100
Lake Forest Open, Lands Association Land Conservancy of Lake County
272 E. Deerpath, Suite 318 P.O. Box 293
Lake Forest, IL 60045 Lake Villa, IL 60046
(847) 234-3880 (847) 356-6001
Land Conservancy of McHenry County Liberty Prairie Conservancy
P.O. Box 352 32400 N. Harris Road
Woodstock, IL 60098 Grayslake, IL 60030
(815) 337-9502 (847) 548-5989
The Conservation Foundation
10 S. 404 Knoch Knolls Road
Naperville, IL 60565
(630) 428-4500
United City of Yorkville
County Seat of Kendall County
E 1
1636 800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, Illinois, 60560
�e Telephone : 630-553-4350
<LE
Date: December 5, 2007
To: Plan Commission
From: Travis Miller, Community Development Director
Cc: Annette Williams, Administrative Assistant (for distribution)
Subject: Comprehensive Plan Citizen Advisory Committee Meeting Facilitators
November 14, 2007 marked the first meeting in the process of updating the United City of
Yorkville's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan Citizen Advisory Committee will be
meeting monthly, the third Thursday of each month, to discuss a chapter of the comprehensive
plan. There will be two main meeting tasks at these monthly meetings, perform a SWOT Analysis
and formulate Goals and Objectives which correspond to the meeting topic of that night. The
Citizen Advisory Committee comprised of approximately 32 members will be split among 5 or 6
groups to complete these tasks. These groups will be guided through the meeting tasks by a
meeting facilitator.
The first meeting task is a SWOT Analysis. SWOT is an acronym which stands for Strengths,
Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. As a meeting facilitator your role is to guide the
discussion to ensure that it is productive and each topic of the SWOT Analysis is covered in the
allotted time. You will be provided with a large memo pad and marker to record the comments
given by the committee members. Following this, the committee will reconvene as a whole to
share each group's SWOT Analysis. Major themes from the SWOT Analysis will be used as a
means of goal formulation. A GOAL is general language outlining a need or desire which
compliments the overall intent and vision of the comprehensive plan.
Following goal formulation by the whole committee, each group will be given 1-2 specific goals
to develop objectives for. An OBJECTIVE is a specific task in order to implement or achieve a
goal. In general, a goal is what the community hopes to accomplish through the comprehensive
plan and an objective is the means of accomplishing it. As the meeting facilitator you will guide
your group in developing objectives for each goal. When formulating objectives follow the
SMART method, Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Time dated. Along with each
objective, an action plan will also be developed as an outline to achieve that specific objective.
You may have multiple objectives for achieving one goal. The goals, objectives, and action plans
will also be recorded by the meeting facilitator on the goals and objectives worksheet.
This process will be done at each Citizen Advisory Committee meeting from now until late spring.
Your participation will help make each meeting more organized, efficient, and productive.
Attachments: Facilitator Tips
Goals and Objectives Worksheet
I
FACILITATOR TIPS'
1. A facilitator makes no decisions for the group, but suggests ways to help the group
move forward.
2. The responsibility of the facilitator is to the group and its work rather than to the
individuals within the group.
3. Know the agenda and have a good understanding of the big picture.
4. Keep the group focused on the agenda item and task at hand.
5. Make sure that people's comments and ideas are properly recorded.
6. Encourage the expression of various viewpoints - the more important the decision, the
more important it is to have all pertinent information (facts, feelings and opinions) on the
table.
7. Make sure everyone has a chance to participate. Call on people who haven't spoken as
much to give them an opportunity to address the issue. Notice who is confused, agitated
or unhappy with the debate, and call on them to speak to the issue.
8. Suggest ways to look at problems and reach conclusions. Break big problems into
workable pieces and look for minor points of agreement to help morale.
9. Periodically summarize what has happened, what has been resolved, and focus on
identifying appropriate next steps.
10. Remain neutral.
1 Wolf, Kevin "The Makings of a Good Meeting," 10_30_2002
lgp://www.wolfandassociates.com/facilitation/manual.pd
Excerpts have been taken from this manual which is applicable to this process.
2
Goal
Objective
Action Plan for Implementation
Step Action Taken Party Responsible Timeline
1
2
3
4
5
6
3