Public Works Packet 2015 08-18-15
AGENDA
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING
Tuesday, August 18, 2015
6:00 p.m.
City Hall Conference Room
Citizen Comments:
Minutes for Correction/Approval: July 21, 2015
New Business:
1. PW 2015-46 Well No. 8 Rehabilitation – Professional Services Agreement – Design and
Construction Engineering
2. PW 2015-47 Route 47 Improvements – Route 71 to Caton Farm Road
3. PW 2015-48 River Road and King Street Intersection – Stop Sign Request
4. PW 2015-49 Traffic Control Requests
a. Alan Dale Lane and Yellowstone Lane
b. E. Spring Street and Freemont Street
Old Business:
1. PW 2015-45 E-Waste Recycling
2. PW 2015-43 Prestwick / Ashley Pointe Bond Call
3. PW 2015-27 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining – Change Order No. 1
4. PW 2015-15 Game Farm Road – Somonauk Street Project – Update
Additional Business:
2015/2016 City Council Goals – Public Works Committee
Goal Priority Staff
“Countryside Infrastructure” 4 Eric Dhuse & Brad Sanderson
“Vehicle Replacement” 5 Eric Dhuse
“Capital Infrastructure” 7 Bart Olson & Eric Dhuse
“Road Study (Update & Refresh)” 9 Eric Dhuse & Brad Sanderson
“Sidewalk Plan Funding” 18 Bart Olson & Rob Fredrickson
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
Telephone: 630-553-4350
www.yorkville.il.us
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
WORKSHEET
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
Tuesday, August 18, 2015
6:00 PM
CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITIZEN COMMENTS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. July 21 2015
□ Approved ________
□ As presented
□ With corrections
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEW BUSINESS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. PW 2015-46 Well No. 8 Rehabilitation – Professional Services Agreement – Design and Construction
Engineering
□ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. PW 2015-47 Route 47 Improvements – Route 71 to Caton Farm Road
□ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. PW 2015-48 River Road and King Street Intersection – Stop Sign Request
□ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. PW 2015-49 Traffic Control Requests
a. Alan Dale Lane and Yellowstone Lane
b. E. Spring Street and Freemont Street
□ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OLD BUSINESS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CC 2015-45 E-Waste Recycling
□ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. PW 2015-43 Prestwick / Ashley Pointe Bond Call
□ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. PW 2015-27 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining – Change Order No. 1
□ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. PW 2015-15 Game Farm Road – Somonauk Street Project - Update
□ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N
□ Approved by Committee __________
□ Bring back to Committee __________
□ Informational Item
□ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
Minutes
Tracking Number
Minutes of the Public Works Committee – July 21, 2015
Public Works Committee – August 18, 2015
Majority
Committee Approval
Minute Taker
Name Department
Page 1 of 5
DRAFT
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
Tuesday, July 21, 2015, 6:00pm
Yorkville City Hall, Conference Room
800 Game Farm Road
IN ATTENDANCE:
Committee Members
Chairman Chris Funkhouser
Alderman Ken Koch
Alderman Jackie Milschewski
Alderman Larry Kot
Other City Officials
City Administrator Bart Olson
Community Development Director Krysti Barksdale-Noble
Public Works Director Eric Dhuse
Engineer Brad Sanderson, EEI
Other Guests:
Attorney John Phillipchuck, Ashley Pointe
Ed Bushnell, Stewart
Bryan Hernandez, Whispering Meadows
John Stewart, Stewart
The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Chairman Chris Funkhouser.
Citizen Comments: None
Previous Meeting Minutes: June 16, 2015
The minutes were approved as presented.
New Business:
1. PW 2015-37 2015 Bond/LOC Reduction Summary to Date
Mr. Sanderson said this is a quarterly report and noted a couple minimal changes with Caledonia.
2. PW 2015-38 Game Farm Road and Somonauk Street Improvements – Authorization No. 1
Change orders were discussed that include a storm sewer that was thought to be abandoned, but was
actually needed. Additional excavation was needed near the retaining wall and temporary signs were
Page 2 of 5
also needed to direct drivers. There was an increase of $28,937.05 for which Mr. Sanderson
recommended approval. He said some unanticipated things occurred such as storm sewer that needed
to be replaced, but due to bad soil it was lined instead. He also said watermain near city hall is shallow
and will have to be lowered. This item moves to the consent agenda.
3. PW 2015-39 2014 Road to Better Roads Program – Change Order No. 1
This is a change/balancing order to close out last year's program with work completed this spring and
decreased the cost by $3,194.84. Mr. Sanderson recommended approval and it moves to the consent
agenda.
4. PW 2015-40 Kennedy Road Right-of-Way – Plat of Dedication
Some additional right-of-way dedication was needed for the shared use path tied in with Grande
Reserve, now owned by Avanti. The plat was finally received and Mr. Sanderson recommended
acceptance of this plat. Alderman Kot inquired about the fund-raising for the path and Mr. Olson said
the fund does have a six-digit amount at this time. An updated cost estimate should come in the next
month. This moves to consent agenda.
5. PW 2015-41 Kennedy Road Shared Use Path (ITEP) – Railroad Agreement
In order to continue the shared use path, improvements will be needed on Kennedy at the railroad
crossing. An agreement is needed with ICC in order to make the improvements and a meeting has been
held with the railroad. The estimated cost for gates, signals and other requirements is about $300,000
to $400,000. Mr. Sanderson recommended submitting this petition to ICC to continue the process.
Chairman Funkhouser noted this action is needed in order to continue the path to the park on Kennedy.
This moves to the consent agenda.
6. PW 2015-42 Subordination of Surface Rights – Route 71 and Van Emmon
This is a clean-up of the Rt. 71 project whereby the City certifies the State infrastructure is more
important than the City's. Alderman Milschewski asked if this might actually be outside the City
limits. Chairman Funkhouser said he believes it to be in the City since a utility runs through it. Mr.
Olson suggested verifying before approval. It will move to the consent agenda, but will be pulled from
consent depending on the finding.
7. PW 2015-43 Prestwick/Ashley Pointe Bond Call
Mr. Sanderson said developments are reviewed periodically and Prestwick and Ashley Pointe were
brought forward to discuss the lack of improvement completion. Some work was done in 2012, but
some items remain to be done. Mr. Sanderson said it's possible the entire binder course may need to be
replaced.
Attorney John Phillipchuck was present on behalf of the Stewarts. He said there are only 3 houses
occupied in the subdivision and asked what action the City desired. Mr. Sanderson detailed what
improvements should be made if the bond was called. Chairman Funkhouser said it would be cheaper
to repair the road rather than pull it. He noted that if the developer made the improvements and the
Council accepted them, it would be City responsibility after that. Mr. John Stewart said he was
originally told in April not to put on the final lift. Bart Olson said the developer must maintain the
roads until the City accepts them and that the City is moving towards early acceptance. Mr. Olson
pointed out that there is a bond in place so the work may be completed instead of paying out the cash.
Page 3 of 5
He said the City would like the infrastructure completed first. It was noted some punchlist items are
done related to erosion control.
Alderman Koch questioned if there are new homes or if progresss is being made in these developments.
There is neither, but Mr. Stewart said there is an issue with the gas line being underneath where the turn
lane would be and Nicor would charge the developer to move the pipeline. There is no entrance off of
Ashley at this point. The Attorney said a schedule of work will be provided and Mr. Olson
recommended the item be tabled for one month. Alderman Kot asked for more communication going
forward and Mr. Funkhouser requested a timeline from the developer. This item will be moved forward
to Council as information and will be brought back to committee next month.
8. PW 2015-44 Blackberry Woods Cash Deposit Call
Mr. Sanderson said the developers made some repairs, but the majority of underground and landscaping
items are not done. City staff met with the developer in June requesting an updated schedule, but it has
not been received. Correspondence indicated they are taking bids on some of the work. Mr. Olson said
he is optimistic that an update will be forthcoming from Attorney Kramer. He suggested taking it to
City Council with a recommendation to either table it or call the deposit. This moves to the Public
Works agenda at City Council.
9. PW 2015-45 E-Waste Recycling
Mr. Olson said other communities have similar issues. A recycler who served electronic needs had
been receiving a State subsidy, but ran out of funds. He is hoping private e-waste companies can help
and a second one may be needed. Mr. Dhuse said he has a month's worth of e-waste at this time and he
said citizens are taking the valuable portions of the electronics for which recyclers would have been
paid.
Mr. Funkhouser said he would like to see the City have a once or twice a year collection service.
Alderman Kot said he would like to include collection of hazardous waste (such as batteries) and
Naperville is the only place he knows that takes such items. He said if a service is not offered, people
just hide the items in their garbage. A partnership with the County was another possibility, however,
the cost has become too prohibitive. Mr. Olson said this matter will be addressed before 2017 when the
City contract expires with the trash service. The City will include a notice in the next utility bill stating
the city facility is closed for e-waste and that Naperville is an option.
Old Business:
1. CC 2014-59 Parking Restrictions in Whispering Meadows – Winterberry Drive
Letters were sent to adjacent residents regarding this parking restriction proposal with one call of
opposition. Mr. Olson said there is a need for restrictions here and in other parts of the City. He
added that the problem could potentially be just pushed down the street with this action. Alderman
Funkhouser said there about three dozen similar situations in the City where there is a tight radius on
the street and that should be prohibited in the future. He said by implementing the restriction in this
case it causes more issues since there are mailboxes and driveways on the other side of the road and he
does not favor acting on individual parking restriction requests. Alderman Koch also said he is also
aware of similar parking situations, but does not favor acting on complaints by one individual.
It was noted there appeared to be an oil leak under one of the vehicles in question and that the vehicle
had been parked there for some time. There are 3-4 cars parked in this location at all times. Mr. Koch
Page 4 of 5
addressed Mr. Hernandez about the situation. Mr. Hernandez said it has become a safety issue with his
family and a couple close calls occurred. He said the view would be clear if the cars were gone.
Alderman Funkhouser said the City should impose the same restrictions throughout the City and not
just on one situation. Fire hydrants and emergency vehicle access also need to be considered with the
proposed restrictions. Alderman Kot cautioned that if these types of restrictions are done city-wide,
there will be big problems. Parking in cul-de-sac islands was also briefly discussed. The committee
was divided on their views of the restrictions and also wish to have Alderman Frieders' opinion since it
is in his ward. It moves forward to City Council with a neutral recommendation. Other neighbors are
encouraged to contact the City as well.
2. PW 2015-27 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining – Change Order No. 1
Mr. Olson reported that YBSD is considering the City's request and is receptive to reimbursement. It
may not be full reimbursement, but will help alleviate capacity issues. YBSD requested that Mr.
Sanderson attend their next meeting to provide details. This item will be brought back next month.
3. PW 2015-15 Game Farm Road – Somonauk Street Project - Update
Mr. Sanderson reported the ongoing construction is currently in front of City Hall and is progressing
nicely due to continued good weather. This section should be done before school begins. A sanitary
pipe was lined and there was a watermain issue for which prices are being sought. Landscaping is
underway and the fence is being installed on the retaining wall. Alderman Koch inquired about the
manhole covers that protrude and they will be flush with the road when completed.
Additional Business:
Alderman Koch:
Alderman Koch asked about progress on Windett Ridge which had been discussed at a previous
meeting. A few punchlist items remain. Maintenance was done on the pond and some underground
work is needed. Mr. Sanderson will contact again and ask for a timeline.
He also asked for an update on the Raintree muskrats and requested the contractor to address. Three
quotes are being obtained and it was noted the Encap does not trap. Mr. Funkhouser said if the food
source is removed, the muskrats will leave.
Currently, Mr. Koch is the Park Board liaison and he said Alderman Frieders asked to also be a liaison
on Park Board. The committee was OK with this. Mr. Olson noted that Mr. Frieders would also like to
attend YBSD or KenCom meetings. Ms. Milschewski is currently the YBSD liaison.
Alderman Milschewski
She discussed the railing near the concrete barrier downtown and said the railing should have been
installed on the barrier for a look of consistency. Mr. Olson replied the method of installation was the
cheapest. There was a discussion of the business doors being in the back along Rt. 47 and that the
railing was a mandate.
In another matter, Ms. Milschewski said southbound drivers are turning left on Hydraulic (from Rt. 47)
and on to the railroad. Mr. Dhuse replied that barriers will be installed.
Page 5 of 5
Alderman Kot
He re-addressed the discussion of the sight line on King/Rt. 47/Church/River and asked if a 3-way stop
would be appropriate. Mr. Sanderson said the evaluation is not complete yet, but hopes to have done
by August. Weeds there were now trimmed for better vision.
In another matter, Mr. Kot asked if language “State law, must stop for pedestrians in walkway” or
similar, could be added under the pedestrian crossing signs. Mr. Funkhouser cautioned that Oswego
has 4 lanes of traffic and flashing lights. The outside lane driver sees the lights/pedestrian, but the
inside lane might not. A “walk” button to help pedestrians cross intersections such as Orange St. was
suggested. The button is for the crossing guard according to Mr. Dhuse and he added that IDOT would
probably not approve a button at every intersection with a crosswalk. Brad will look at the cost of a
button at Main & Rt. 47 since many school kids will cross there. Mr. Kot also cited the problem of a
“do not stop on tracks” in front of the pedestrian crossing southbound at Hydraulic and Rt. 47. One
sign is temporary and will be changed.
Alderman Kot asked if the State might pay for a portion of the improvements on Main St. since they
used it for construction. The State will be paying for 1 block. He asked if some of the potholes could
be fixed in the near future and Mr. Dhuse will work with D Construction.
On State St. south of Fox there is a driveway that extends into the roadway, said Mr. Kot, and he
wondered if it could be cut out when the street is redone. Mr. Dhuse will look at it.
In other additional business:
1. There is now a stop sign at Church & Main.
2. Ms. Milschewski thanked Mr. Dhuse for new signs on Heustis
3. Mr. Funkhouser questioned the blue bollard at Van Emmon & 47. It will be repainted and was a
gift from D Construction to protect the mast arm. He also asked about truck traffic enforcement
at Corneils and Beecher. Signs are up and Chief Hart will be asked to look at the issue. He also
asked about the purchase of Kendall Marketplace. The new owner will invest a significant
amount. There is 70% occupancy now and the tenants pay large SSA portions.
There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 7:28pm.
Minutes respectfully transcribed by
Marlys Young, Minute Taker
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
NB #1
Tracking Number
PW 2015-46
Well No. 8 rehabilitation – professional services agreement
Public Works – August 18, 2015
N/A
Majority
Approval
See attached memo.
Bart Olson Administration
Name Department
Summary
Approval of an engineering contract with EEI for design and construction engineering of Well
No. 8 (Grande Reserve).
Background
The attached contract will cover design and construction engineering of rehabilitation of Well
No. 8 in Grande Reserve. Design engineering will be billed as a flat fee of $14,000, and construction
engineering will be billed hourly for an expected cost of $14,000, for a grant total of $28,000. The
engineering and capital cost of rehabilitation were approved in the FY 16 budget in the water fund.
A more detailed description of the work to be performed is provided below, courtesy of EEI:
As we have discussed previously, this is a proactive/preventative measure versus waiting
for a catastrophic failure. It is typical to rehabilitate a deep well every 7-10 years. Well No. 8
was constructed in 2004.
Given the relatively young age of the pump/motor and the anticipation that there are no
significant operational difficulties with the equipment, we believe a rehabilitation of the
pump/motor and column piping are appropriate, as opposed to more intensive work related to
the replacement of these components. EEI’s contract covers specifications and construction
administration/observation for rehabilitation of equipment.
The motor rehabilitation by the contractor would include re-establishing proper
floatation in the mercury seal, replacing the motor oil and oil filter, replacing o-rings, and
cleaning and recoating the motor casing.
The pumping assembly rehabilitation by the contractor would include micrometer
measurements to determine spacing between bushings, pump shaft, impellers, and wear rings
and comparison against manufacturer’s acceptable tolerances. It is assumed that some of these
components will require rehabilitation or replacement to re-establish proper tolerances and
increase the pumping capacity and efficiency. However, a great majority of the pumping
assembly, including the casings, will be reused.
It is expected that the column piping will be sandblasted and recoated, which will extend
the life of the piping.
Televising the well is a common procedure when pulling the pump/motor because it is
beneficial to observe and record the condition of the casing piping and the water producing
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Bart Olson, City Administrator
CC:
Date: August 13, 2015
Subject: Well No. 8 rehabilitation
formation (sandstone) in the well, and this can only be done when the equipment is removed
from the well. It also provides a measurement of well depth, which helps determine if bailing of
sand/fill at the bottom of the well is necessary. We believe it is unlikely any rehabilitation of the
casing or sandstone will be necessary at this time.
The worst case scenario for this project is the need to replace the pump and/or motor
equipment. Unfortunately, we wouldn’t know if any of this is necessary until the pump and
motor are removed from the well and inspected. Although unlikely that equipment replacement
will be required, we believe it is beneficial to obtain pricing for the worst case conditions from
the bidding contractor(s) prior to starting the work. EEI will include a “Mandatory Alternate
Bid Schedule” for items such as motor replacement, motor conversion, pumping assembly
replacement, and column piping replacement. If this work is required, you will then have up-
front pricing locked in for it.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the design and construction engineering contract with EEI for
Well No. 8.
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, IL
Professional Services Agreement - Design and Construction Engineering
THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the United City of Yorkville, hereinafter referred
to as the "City" or “OWNER” and Engineering Enterprises, Inc. hereinafter referred to as
the "Contractor" or “ENGINEER” agrees as follows:
A. Services:
ENGINEER agrees to furnish to the City the following services: The ENGINEER shall
provide any and all necessary engineering services to the City as indicated on the
included exhibits. Design and Construction engineering will be provided for the
rehabilitation of Water Well No. 8, including rehabilitation of existing piping and
equipment and televising of the well. Scope does not include replacement of the piping
and pump, or the replacement or conversion of the existing motor. Engineering will be in
accordance with all City, Standard Specifications for Water and Sewer Construction in
Illinois, Illinois Department of Transportation, and Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency requirements.
B. Term:
Services will be provided beginning on the date of execution of this agreement and
continuing, until terminated by either party upon 7 days written notice to the non-
terminating party or upon completion of the Services. Upon termination the ENGINEER
shall be compensated for all work performed for the City prior to termination.
C. Compensation and maximum amounts due to ENGINEER:
ENGINEER shall receive as compensation for all work and services to be performed
herein, an amount based on the Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost included
in Exhibit 3. Design Engineering will be paid for as a Fixed Fee (FF) in the amount of
$14,000.00 and Construction Engineering will be paid for Hourly (HR) at the actual rates
for services to be performed, currently estimated at $14,000.00. The hourly rates for this
project are shown in the attached 2015 Standard Schedule of Charges (Exhibit 5). All
payments will be made according to the Illinois State Prompt Payment Act and not less
than once every thirty days.
D. Changes in Rates of Compensation:
In the event that this contract is designated in Section B hereof as an Ongoing Contract,
ENGINEER, on or before February 1st of any given year, shall provide written notice of
any change in the rates specified in Section C hereof (or on any attachments hereto) and
said changes shall only be effective on and after May 1st of that same year.
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design and Construction Engineering
E. Ownership of Records and Documents:
ENGINEER agrees that all books and records and other recorded information developed
specifically in connection with this agreement shall remain the property of the City.
ENGINEER agrees to keep such information confidential and not to disclose or
disseminate the information to third parties without the consent of the City. This
confidentiality shall not apply to material or information, which would otherwise be
subject to public disclosure through the freedom of information act or if already
previously disclosed by a third party. Upon termination of this agreement, ENGINEER
agrees to return all such materials to the City. The City agrees not to modify any original
documents produced by ENGINEER without contractors consent. Modifications of any
signed duplicate original document not authorized by ENGINEER will be at OWNER’s
sole risk and without legal liability to the ENGINEER. Use of any incomplete, unsigned
document will, likewise, be at the OWNER’s sole risk and without legal liability to the
ENGINEER.
F. Governing Law:
This contract shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Illinois. Venue shall be in Kendall County, Illinois.
G. Independent Contractor:
ENGINEER shall have sole control over the manner and means of providing the work
and services performed under this agreement. The City’s relationship to the ENGINEER
under this agreement shall be that of an independent contractor. ENGINEER will not be
considered an employee to the City for any purpose.
H. Certifications:
Employment Status: The Contractor certifies that if any of its personnel are an employee
of the State of Illinois, they have permission from their employer to perform the service.
Anti-Bribery : The Contractor certifies it is not barred under 30 Illinois Compiled
Statutes 500/50-5(a) - (d) from contracting as a result of a conviction for or admission of
bribery or attempted bribery of an officer or employee of the State of Illinois or any
other state.
Loan Default: If the Contractor is an individual, the Contractor certifies that he/she is not
in default for a period of six months or more in an amount of $600 or more on the
repayment of any educational loan guaranteed by the Illinois State Scholarship
Commission made by an Illinois institution of higher education or any other loan made
from public funds for the purpose of financing higher education (5 ILCS 385/3).
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design and Construction Engineering
Felony Certification: The Contractor certifies that it is not barred pursuant to 30 Illinois
Compiled Statutes 500/50-10 from conducting business with the State of Illinois or any
agency as a result of being convicted of a felony.
Barred from Contracting : The Contractor certifies that it has not been barred from
contracting as a result of a conviction for bid-rigging or bid rotating under 720 Illinois
Compiled Statutes 5/33E or similar law of another state.
Drug Free Workplace: The Contractor certifies that it is in compliance with the Drug
Free Workplace Act (30 Illinois Compiled Statutes 580) as of the effective date of this
contract. The Drug Free Workplace Act requires, in part, that Contractors, with 25 or
more employees certify and agree to take steps to ensure a drug free workplace by
informing employees of the dangers of drug abuse, of the availability of any treatment or
assistance program, of prohibited activities and of sanctions that will be imposed for
violations; and that individuals with contracts certify that they will not engage in the
manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance in
the performance of the contract.
Non-Discrimination, Certification, and Equal Employment Opportunity : The Contractor
agrees to comply with applicable provisions of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775
Illinois Compiled Statutes 5), the U.S. Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities
Act, Section 504 of the U.S. Rehabilitation Act and the rules applicable to each. The
equal opportunity clause of Section 750.10 of the Illinois Department of Human Rights
Rules is specifically incorporated herein. The Contractor shall comply with Executive
Order 11246, entitled Equal Employment Opportunity, as amended by Executive Order
11375, and as supplemented by U.S. Department of Labor regulations (41 C.F.R. Chapter
60). The Contractor agrees to incorporate this clause into all subcontracts under this
Contract.
International Boycott: The Contractor certifies that neither it nor any substantially owned
affiliated company is participating or shall participate in an international boycott in
violation of the provisions of the U.S. Export Administration Act of 1979 or the
regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce promulgated under that Act (30 ILCS
582).
Record Retention and Audits: If 30 Illinois Compiled Statutes 500/20-65 requires the
Contractor (and any subcontractors) to maintain, for a period of 3 years after the later of
the date of completion of this Contract or the date of final payment under the Contract, all
books and records relating to the performance of the Contract and necessary to support
amounts charged to the City under the Contract. The Contract and all books and records
related to the Contract shall be available for review and audit by the City and the Illinois
Auditor General. If this Contract is funded from contract/grant funds provided by the
U.S. Government, the Contract, books, and records shall be available for review and
audit by the Comptroller General of the U.S. and/or the Inspector General of the federal
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design and Construction Engineering
sponsoring agency. The Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with any audit and to
provide full access to all relevant materials.
United States Resident Certification: (This certification must be included in all contracts
involving personal services by non-resident aliens and foreign entities in accordance with
requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Services for withholding and reporting
federal income taxes.) The Contractor certifies that he/she is a: x United States Citizen
___ Resident Alien ___ Non-Resident Alien The Internal Revenue Service requires that
taxes be withheld on payments made to non resident aliens for the performance of
personal services at the rate of 30%.
Tax Payer Certification : Under penalties of perjury, the Contractor certifies that its
Federal Tax Payer Identification Number or Social Security Number is (provided
separately) and is doing business as a (check one): ___ Individual ___ Real Estate
Agent ___ Sole Proprietorship ___ Government Entity ___ Partnership ___ Tax
Exempt Organization (IRC 501(a) only) x Corporation ___ Not for Profit Corporation
___ Trust or Estate ___ Medical and Health Care Services Provider Corp.
I. Indemnification:
ENGINEER shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and City’s agents, servants, and
employees against all loss, damage, and expense which it may sustain or for which it will
become liable on account of injury to or death of persons, or on account of damage to or
destruction of property resulting from the performance of work under this agreement by
ENGINEER or its Subcontractors, or due to or arising in any manner from the wrongful
act or negligence of ENGINEER or its Subcontractors of any employee of any of them.
In the event that the either party shall bring any suit, cause of action or counterclaim
against the other party, the non-prevailing party shall pay to the prevailing party the cost
and expenses incurred to answer and/or defend such action, including reasonable attorney
fees and court costs. In no event shall the either party indemnify any other party for the
consequences of that party’s negligence, including failure to follow the ENGINEER’s
recommendations.
J. Insurance:
The ENGINEER agrees that it has either attached a copy of all required insurance
certificates or that said insurance is not required due to the nature and extent of the types
of services rendered hereunder. (Not applicable as having been previously supplied)
K. Additional Terms or Modification:
The terms of this agreement shall be further modified as provided on the attachments.
Except for those terms included on the attachments, no additional terms are included as a
part of this agreement. All prior understandings and agreements between the parties are
merged into this agreement, and this agreement may not be modified orally or in any
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design and Construction Engineering
manner other than by an agreement in writing signed by both parties. In the event that
any provisions of this agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the
remaining provisions shall be valid and binding on the parties. The list of exhibits is as
follows:
Exhibit 1: Professional Engineering Services
Exhibit 2: Limitation of Authority, Duties and Responsibilities of the
Resident Construction Observer
Exhibit 3: Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost
Exhibit 4: Anticipated Project Schedule
Exhibit 5: 2015 Standard Schedule of Charges
L. Notices:
All notices required to be given under the terms of this agreement shall be given mail,
addressed to the parties as follows:
For the City: For the ENGINEER:
City Administrator and City Clerk Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
United City of Yorkville 52 Wheeler Road
800 Game Farm Road Sugar Grove Illinois 60554
Yorkville, IL 60560
Either of the parties may designate in writing from time to time substitute addresses or
persons in connection with required notices.
Agreed to this _____day of __________________, 2015.
United City of Yorkville: Engineering Enterprises, Inc.:
_________________________________ ________________________________
Gary Golinski Brad Sanderson, P.E.
Mayor Vice President
_________________________________ ________________________________
Beth Warren Angie Smith
City Clerk Executive Assistant
1
EXHIBIT 1
SECTION A - PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES
For purposes of this Exhibit 1 and all attachments hereto, the term “contractor” shall not refer to
Engineering Enterprises, Inc., but shall instead refer to individuals or companies contracted with, to
construct or otherwise manage the project described herein. The ENGINEER shall furnish professional
design engineering services as follows:
1. The ENGINEER will attend conferences with the OWNER, or other interested parties as may be
reasonably necessary.
2. The ENGINEER will perform the necessary design surveys, accomplish the detailed design of
the project, prepare construction drawings, specifications and contract documents, and prepare a
final cost estimate based on final design for the entire system. It is also understood that if
subsurface explorations (such as borings, soil tests, rock soundings and the like) are required, the
ENGINEER will furnish coordination of said explorations without additional charge, but the
costs incident to such explorations shall be paid for by the OWNER as set out in Section D
hereof.
3. The contract documents furnished by the ENGINEER under Section A-2 shall utilize IEPA
endorsed construction contract documents, including Supplemental General Conditions, Contract
Change Orders, and partial payment estimates.
4. Prior to the advertisement for bids, the ENGINEER will provide for each construction contract,
not to exceed 10 copies of detailed drawings, specifications, and contract documents for use by
the OWNER, appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies from whom approval of the project
must be obtained. The cost of such drawings, specifications, and contract documents shall be
included in the basic compensation paid to the ENGINEER.
5. The ENGINEER will furnish additional copies of the drawings, specifications and contract
documents as required by prospective bidders, material suppliers, and other interested parties,
but may charge them for the reasonable cost of such copies. Upon award of each contract, the
2
ENGINEER will furnish to the OWNER five sets of the drawings, specifications and contract
documents for execution. The cost of these sets shall be included in the basic compensation paid
to the ENGINEER. Original documents, survey notes, tracings, and the like, except those
furnished to the ENGINEER by the OWNER, are and shall remain the property of the
ENGINEER.
6. The drawings prepared by the ENGINEER under the provisions of Section A-2 above shall be in
sufficient detail to permit the actual location of the proposed improvements on the ground. The
ENGINEER shall prepare and furnish to the OWNER without any additional compensation,
three copies of map(s) showing the general location of needed construction easements and
permanent easements and the land to be acquired. Property surveys, property plats, property
descriptions, abstracting and negotiations for land rights shall be accomplished by the OWNER,
unless the OWNER requests, and the ENGINEER agrees to provide those services. In the event
the ENGINEER is requested to provide such services, the ENGINEER shall be additionally
compensated as set out in Section D hereof.
7. The ENGINEER will attend the bid opening and tabulate the bid proposal, make an analysis of
the bids, and make recommendations for awarding contracts for construction.
8. The ENGINEER further agrees to obtain and maintain, at the ENGINEER’s expense, such
insurance as will protect the ENGINEER from claims under the Workman’s Compensation Act
and such comprehensive general liability insurance as will protect the OWNER and the
ENGINEER from all claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from
the performance by the ENGINEER or by the ENGINEER’s employees of the ENGINEER’s
functions and services required under this Agreement.
9. The ENGINEER will complete the final plans, specifications and contract documents and submit
for approval of the OWNER, and all State regulatory agencies to meet the project schedule(s) as
summarized in Exhibit 4: “Anticipated Project Schedule – Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation”
dated August 7, 2015.
3
SECTION B - PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SERVICES
The ENGINEER shall furnish professional construction engineering services as follows:
1. The ENGINEER will review, for conformance with the design concept, shop and working
drawings required by the construction Contract Documents and indicate on the drawings the
action taken. Such action shall be taken with reasonable promptness.
2. The ENGINEER will interpret the intent of the drawings and specifications to protect the
OWNER against defects and deficiencies in construction on the part of the contractors. The
ENGINEER will not, however, guarantee the performance by any contractor.
3. The ENGINEER will evaluate and determine acceptability of substitute materials and equipment
proposed by Contractor(s).
4. The ENGINEER will establish baselines for locating the work together with a suitable number of
bench marks adjacent to the work as shown in the contract documents.
5. The ENGINEER will provide general engineering review of the work of the contractor(s) as
construction progresses to ascertain that the contactor is conforming to the design concept.
(a) ENGINEER shall have authority, as the OWNER’s representative, to require special
inspection of or testing of the work, and shall receive and review all certificates of
inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes,
orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine generally that their content
complies with requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the
Contract Documents).
(b) During such engineering review, ENGINEER shall have the authority, as the OWNER’s
representative, to disapprove of or reject contractor(s)’ work while it is in progress if
ENGINEER believes that such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms
generally to the Contract Documents or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design
concept of the Project as reflected in the Contract Documents.
4
6. The ENGINEER will provide resident construction observation. Resident construction
observation shall consist of visual inspection of materials, equipment, or construction work for
the purpose of ascertaining that the work is in substantial conformance with the contract
documents and with the design intent. Such observation shall not be relied upon by others as
acceptance of the work. The ENGINEER’s undertaking hereunder shall not relieve the
contractor of contractor’s obligation to perform the work in conformity with the drawings and
specifications and in a workmanlike manner; shall not make the ENGINEER an insurer of the
contractor’s performance; and shall not impose upon the ENGINEER any obligation to see that
the work is performed in a safe manner. Exhibit 2 - The Limitations of Authority, Duties and
Responsibilities of the Resident Construction Observer is attached to this Agreement.
7. The ENGINEER will cooperate and work closely with representatives of the OWNER.
8. Based on the ENGINEER’s on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design
professional, on information provided by the Resident Construction Observer, and upon review
of applications for payment with the accompanying data and schedules by the contractor, the
ENGINEER:
(a) Shall determine the amounts owing to contractor(s) and recommend in writing payments
to contractor(s) in such amounts. Such recommendations of payment will constitute a
representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review, that the work has
progressed to the point indicated, and that, to the best of the ENGINEER’s knowledge,
information and belief, the quality of such work is generally in accordance with the
Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning whole prior
to or upon substantial completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the
Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation).
(b) By recommending any payment, ENGINEER will not hereby be deemed to have
represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or examinations have been
made by ENGINEER to check the quality or quantity of contractor(s)’ work as it is
furnished and performed beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER
in the Agreement and the Contract Documents. ENGINEER’s review of contractor(s)’
5
work for the purposes of recommending payments will not impose on Engineer
responsibility to supervise, direct or control such work or for the means, methods,
techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs
incident thereto or contractor(s) compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances,
codes or orders applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. It will also not
impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make any examination to ascertain how or for
what purposes any contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Price,
or to determine that title to any of the work, materials equipment has passed to OWNER
free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests, or encumbrances, or that there may
not be other matters at issue between OWNER and contractor that might affect the
amount that should be paid.
9. The ENGINEER will prepare necessary contract change orders for approval of the OWNER, and
others on a timely basis.
10. The ENGINEER will make a final review prior to the issuance of the statement of substantial
completion of all construction and submit a written report to the OWNER. Prior to submitting
the final pay estimate, the ENGINEER shall submit the statement of completion to and obtain the
written acceptance of the facility from the OWNER.
11. The ENGINEER will provide the OWNER with one set of reproducible record (as-built)
drawings, and two sets of prints at no additional cost to the OWNER. Such drawings will be
based upon construction records provided by the contractor during construction and reviewed by
the resident construction observer and from the resident construction observer’s construction
data.
12. If State Statutes require notices and advertisements of final payment, the ENGINEER shall assist
in their preparation.
13. The ENGINEER will be available to furnish engineering services and consultations necessary to
correct unforeseen project operation difficulties for a period of one year after the date of
statement of substantial completion of the facility. This service will include instruction of the
OWNER in initial project operation and maintenance but will not include supervision of normal
6
operation of the system. Such consultation and advice shall be at the hourly rates as described in
the attached Exhibit 5: Standard Schedule of Charges dated January 1, 2015. The ENGINEER
will assist the OWNER in performing a review of the project during the 11th month after the
date of the certificate of substantial completion.
14. The ENGINEER further agrees to obtain and maintain, at the ENGINEER’s expense, such
insurance as will protect the ENGINEER from claims under the Workman’s Compensation Act
and such comprehensive general liability insurance as will protect the OWNER and the
ENGINEER from all claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from
the performance by the ENGINEER or by the ENGINEER’s employees of the ENGINEER’s
functions and services required under this Agreement.
15. The ENGINEER will provide construction engineering services in accordance with the periods
summarized in Exhibit 4: “Anticipated Project Schedule – Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation”
dated August 7, 2015.
If the above is not accomplished within the time period specified, this Agreement may be terminated by
the OWNER. The time for completion may be extended by the OWNER for a reasonable time if
completion is delayed due to unforeseeable cases beyond the control and without the fault or negligence
of the ENGINEER. Pursuant to Paragraph D “Changes in Rates of Compensation”, the contract shall be
designated on-going consistent with the project schedule.
7
SECTION C – COMPENSATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
1. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for professional design engineering services in
the amount of Fourteen Thousand Dollars – Fixed Fee (FF) ($14,000.00 FF) as summarized on
Exhibit 3: “Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost for Professional Engineering
Services for Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation” dated August 7, 2015.
(a) The compensation for the professional design engineering services shall be payable as
follows:
(1) A sum which does not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the total compensation
payable under Section C-1 shall be paid in monthly increments for work actually
completed and invoiced, for grant administration and for the preparation and
submission to the OWNER of the construction drawings, specifications, cost
estimates and contract documents.
(2) A sum which, together with the compensation paid pursuant to Section C-1(a)(1)
above, equals one hundred percent (100%) of the total compensation due and
payable in accord with Section C-1 above, shall be due immediately after the
award of construction contract(s) is approved by the corporate authorities.
2. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for the construction administration, construction
observation (including the Resident Construction Observer), and any additional consultation
services on the basis of Hourly Rates (HR) as described on the attached Exhibit 5: Standard
Schedule of Charges dated January 1, 2015. The estimated values are included in Exhibit 3:
“Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost for Professional Engineering Services for
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation” dated August 7, 2015 and are estimated at $14,000.00 Hourly
(HR).
(a) The compensation for the construction administration, construction observation
(including the Resident Construction Observer), and any additional consultation and
surveying services shall be payable as follows:
8
(1) A sum which equals any charges for work actually completed and invoiced shall
be paid at least once per month.
3. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for direct expenses as identified in the contract
and as noted on Exhibit 3 at the actual cost or hourly cost for the work completed.
(1) A sum which equals any charges for work actually completed and invoiced shall be paid
at least once per month.
4. The compensation for any additional engineering services authorized by the OWNER pursuant to
Section D shall be payable as follows:
(a) A sum which equals any charges for work actually completed and invoiced shall be paid
at least once per month.
9
SECTION D – ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
In addition to the foregoing being performed, the following services may be provided UPON PRIOR
WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE OWNER.
1. Site surveys outside of the project limits and other similar special surveys as may be required.
2. Laboratory tests, well tests, borings, specialized geological soils hydraulic, or other studies
recommended by the ENGINEER.
3. Property surveys, detailed description of sites, maps, drawings, or estimates related thereto;
assistance in negotiating for land and easement rights.
4. Necessary data and filing maps for litigation, such as condemnation.
5. Redesigns ordered by the OWNER after final plans have been accepted by the OWNER and
IEPA.
6. Appearances before courts or boards on matters of litigation or hearings related to the project.
7. Preparation of environmental impact assessments or environmental impact statements.
8. Making drawings from field measurements of existing facilities when required for planning
additions or alterations thereto.
9. Services due to changes in the scope of the Project or its design, including but not limited to,
changes in size, complexity, schedule or character of construction.
10. Revising studies or reports which have previously been approved by the OWNER, or when
revisions are due to cases beyond the control of the ENGINEER.
10
11. Preparation of design documents for alternate bids where major changes require additional
documents.
12. Preparation of detailed renderings, exhibits or scale models for the Project.
13. Providing special analysis of the OWNER’s needs such as owning and operating analysis, plan
for operation and maintenance, OWNER’s special operating drawings or charts, and any other
similar analysis.
14. The preparation of feasibility studies, appraisals and evaluations, detailed quantity surveys of
material and labor, and material audits or inventories by the OWNER.
15. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1) work damaged by
fire or other cause during construction, (2) defective or incomplete work of the contractor, and/or
(3) the contractor’s default on the Construction Contract due to delinquency or insolvency.
16. Providing design services relating to future facilities, systems and equipment which are not
intended to be constructed or operated as a part of the Project.
17. Providing other services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement, including services
normally furnished by the OWNER as described in Section E – SPECIAL PROVISIONS –
Owner’s Responsibilities.
Payment for the services specified in this Section E shall be as agreed in writing between the OWNER
and the ENGINEER prior to commencement of the work. The ENGINEER will render to OWNER for
such services an itemized bill, separate from any other billing, once each month, for compensation for
services performed hereunder during such period, the same to be due and payable by OWNER to the
ENGINEER on or before the 10th day of the following period. Payment for services noted in D shall be
at Actual Cost (AC), Fixed Fee (FF) or Hourly (HR).
11
SECTION E - SPECIAL PROVISIONS
1. OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITIES
(a) Provide to the ENGINEER all criteria, design and construction standards and full
information as to the OWNER’s requirements for the Project.
(b) Designate a person authorized to act as the OWNER’s representative. The OWNER or
his representative shall receive and examine documents submitted by the ENGINEER,
interpret and define the OWNER’s policies and render decisions and authorizations in
writing promptly to prevent unreasonable delay in the progress of the ENGINEER’s
services.
(c) Furnish laboratory tests, air and water pollution tests, reports and inspections of samples,
materials or other items required by law or by governmental authorities having
jurisdiction over this Project, or as recommended by the ENGINEER.
(d) Provide legal, accounting, right-of-way acquisition and insurance counseling services
necessary for the Project, legal review of the construction Contract Documents, and such
auditing services as the OWNER may require to account for expenditures of sums paid to
the contractor.
(e) Furnish above services at the OWNER’s expense and in such manner that the
ENGINEER may rely upon them in the performance of his services under this Agreement
and in accordance with the Project timetable.
(f) Guarantee full and free access for the ENGINEER to enter upon all property required for
the performance of the ENGINEER’s services under this Agreement.
(g) Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the OWNER observes or
otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the Project or other event which may
substantially affect the ENGINEER’s performance of services under this Agreement.
12
(h) Protect and preserve all survey stakes and markers placed at the project site prior to the
assumption of this responsibility by the contractor and bear all costs of replacing stakes
or markers damaged or removed during said time interval.
2. Delegation of Duties - Neither the OWNER nor the ENGINEER shall delegate his duties under
this Agreement without the written consent of the other.
3. The ENGINEER has not been retained or compensated to provide design services relating to the
contractor’s safety precautions or to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures
required by the contractor to perform his work but not relating to the final or completed
structure. Omitted services include but are not limited to shoring, scaffolding, underpinning,
temporary retainment of excavations and any erection methods and temporary bracing.
4. The ENGINEER intends to render his services under this Agreement in accordance with
generally accepted professional practices for the intended use of the Project.
5. Since the ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services
furnished by others, or over the contractor(s) methods of determining prices, or over competitive
bidding or market conditions, his opinions of probable Project Costs and Construction Costs
provided for herein are to be made on the basis of his experience and qualifications and represent
his best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the
construction industry. The ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or
actual project or construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by him.
If prior to the bidding or negotiating phase OWNER wishes greater assurance as to project or
construction costs he shall employ an independent cost-estimator.
6. Access to Records:
(a) The ENGINEER agrees to include subsections E-6(b) through E-6(e) below in all
contracts and all subcontracts directly related to project services which are in excess of
$25,000.
13
(b) The ENGINEER shall maintain books, records, documents and other evidence directly
pertinent to performance of Agency loan work under this Agreement consistent with
generally accepted accounting standards in accordance with the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants Professional Standards (666 Fifth Avenue, New York, New
York 10019; June 1, 1987). The Agency or any of its duly authorized representatives
shall have access to such books, records, documents and other evidence for the purpose
of inspection, audit and copying. The ENGINEER will provide facilities for such access
and inspection.
(c) Audits conducted pursuant to this provision shall be in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards.
(d) The ENGINEER agrees to the disclosure of all information and reports resulting from
access to records pursuant to subsection E-6(b) above, to the Agency. Where the audit
concerns the ENGINEER, the auditing agency shall afford the ENGINEER an
opportunity for an audit exit conference and an opportunity to comment on the pertinent
portions of the draft audit report. The final audit report will include the written
comments, if any, of the audited parties.
(e) Records under subsection E-6(b) above shall be maintained and made available during
performance on Agency loan work under this agreement and until three years from date
of final Agency loan audit for the project. In addition, those records which relate to any
“dispute” appeal under an Agency loan agreement, or litigation, or the settlement of
claims arising out of such performance, costs or items to which an audit exception has
been taken, shall be maintained and made available until three years after the date of
resolution of such appeal, litigation, claim or exception.
7. Covenant Against Contingent Fees - The ENGINEER warrants that no person or selling agency
has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or
understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bonafide
employees. For breach or violation of this warranty, the loan recipient shall have the right to
annul this agreement without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or
14
consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage,
or contingent fee.
8. Covenant Against Contingent Fees - The loan recipient warrants that no person or agency has
been employed or retained to solicit or secure a PWSLP loan upon an agreement or
understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. For breach or
violation of this warranty, the Agency shall have the right to annul the loan or to deduct from the
loan or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or
contingent fee.
9. Certification Regarding Debarment – The ENGINEER certifies that the services of anyone that
has been debarred or suspended under Federal Executive Order 12549 has not, and will not, be
used for work under this Agreement.
10. Affirmative Action – The ENGINEER agrees to take affirmative steps to assure that
disadvantaged business enterprises are utilized when possible as sources of supplies, equipment,
construction and services in accordance with the Clean Water Loan Program rules. As required
by the award conditions of USEPA's Assistance Agreement with IEPA, the ENGINEER
acknowledges that the fair share percentages are 5% for MBEs and 12% for WBEs.
11. The ENGINEER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the
performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 40 CFR
Part 33 in the award and administration of contracts awarded under EPA financial assistance
agreements. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this
contract which may result in the termination of this contract or other legally available remedies.
15
EXHIBIT 2
THE LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE RESIDENT
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVER ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Resident Construction Observer shall act under the direct supervision of the ENGINEER,
shall be the ENGINEER’s agent in all matters relating to on-site construction review of the
contractor’s work, shall communicate only with the ENGINEER and the contractor (or
contractor’s), and shall communicate with subcontractors only through the contractor or his
authorized superintendent. The OWNER shall communicate with the Resident Construction
Observer only through the ENGINEER.
2. The Resident Construction Observer shall review and inspect on-site construction activities of
the contractor relating to portions of the Project designed and specified by the Engineer as
contained in the Construction Contract Documents.
3. Specifically omitted from the Resident Construction Observer’s duties is any review of the
contractor’s safety precautions, or the means, methods, sequences, or procedures required for the
contractor to perform the work but not relating to the final or completed Project. Omitted design
or review services include but are not limited to shoring, scaffolding, underpinning, temporary
retainment of excavations and any erection methods and temporary bracing.
4. The specific duties and responsibilities of the Resident Construction Observer are enumerated as
follows:
(a) Schedules: Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing submissions and
schedule of values prepared by contractor and consult with ENGINEER concerning their
acceptability.
(b) Conferences: Attend preconstruction conferences. Arrange a schedule of progress
meetings and other job conferences as required in consultation with ENGINEER and
notify those expected to attend in advance. Attend meetings and maintain and circulate
copies of minutes thereof.
16
(c) Liaison:
(1) Serve as ENGINEER’s liaison with contractor, working principally through
contractor’s superintendent and assist him in understanding the intent of the
Contract Documents.
(2) Assist ENGINEER in serving as OWNER’s liaison with contractor when
contractor’s operations affect OWNER’s on-site operations.
(3) As requested by ENGINEER, assist in obtaining from OWNER additional details
or information, when required at the job site for proper erection of the work.
(d) Shop Drawings and Samples:
(2) Receive and record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples.
(3) Receive samples which are furnished at the site by contrctor, and notify
ENGINEER of their availability for examination.
(3) Advise ENGINEER and contractor or its superintendent immediately of the
commencement of any work requiring a Shop Drawing or sample submission if
the submission has not been approved by ENGINEER.
(e) Review of Work, Rejection of Defective Work, Inspections and Tests:
(1) Conduct on-site inspection of the work in progress to assist ENGINEER in
determining if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents
and that completed work will conform to the Contract Documents.
(2) Report to ENGINEER whenever he believes that any work is unsatisfactory,
faulty or defective or does not conform to the Contract Documents, or does not
meet the requirements of any inspections, test or approval required to be made or
17
has been damaged prior to final payment; and advise ENGINEER when he
believes work should be corrected or rejected or should be uncovered for
inspection, or requires special testing, inspection or approval.
(3) Verify that tests, equipment and systems start-ups, and operating and maintenance
instructions are conducted as required by the Contract Documents and in presence
of the required personnel, and that contractor maintains adequate records thereof;
observe, record and report to ENGINEER appropriate details relative to the test
procedures and start-ups.
(4) Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having
jurisdiction over the Project, record the outcome of these inspections and report to
ENGINEER.
(f) Interpretation of Contract Documents: Transmit to contractor ENGINEER’s clarifications
and interpretations of the Contract Documents.
(g) Modifications: Consider and evaluate contractor’s suggestions for modifications in
Drawings or Specifications and report them with recommendations to ENGINEER.
(h) Records:
(1) Maintain at the job site orderly files for correspondence, reports of job
conferences, Shop Drawings and samples submissions, reproductions of original
Contract Documents including all addenda, change orders, field orders, additional
drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Contract, ENGINEER’s
clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents, progress reports, and
other Project related documents.
(2) Keep a diary or log book, recording hours on the job site, weather conditions, data
relative to questions of extras or deductions, list of visiting officials and
representatives of manufacturers, fabricators, suppliers and distributors, daily
18
activities, decisions, observations in general and specific observations in more
detail as in the case of observing test procedures. Send copies to ENGINEER.
(4) Record names, addresses and telephone numbers of all contractor’s,
subcontractors and major suppliers of materials and equipment.
(i) Reports:
(1) Furnish ENGINEER periodic reports as required of progress of the work and
contractor’s compliance with the approved progress schedule and schedule of
Shop Drawing submissions.
(2) Consult with ENGINEER in advance of schedule major tests, inspections or start
of important phases of the work.
(3) Report immediately to ENGINEER upon the occurrence of any accident.
(j) Payment Requisitions: Review applications for payment with contractor for compliance
with the established procedure for their submission and forward them with
recommendations to ENGINEER, noting particularly their relation to the schedule of
values, work completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site but not
incorporated in the work.
(k) Certificates, Maintenance and Operating Manuals: During the course of the work, verify
that certificates, maintenance and operation manuals and other data required to be
assembled and furnished by contractor are applicable to the items actually installed; and
deliver this material to ENGINEER for his review and forwarding to OWNER prior to
final acceptance of the work.
(l) Completion:
(1) Before ENGINEER issues a Statement of Substantial Completion, submit to
contractor a list of observed items requiring completion or correction.
19
(2) Conduct final review in the company of ENGINEER, OWNER and contractor
and prepare a final list of items to be completed or corrected.
(3) Verify that all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make
recommendations to ENGINEER concerning acceptance.
EN
T
I
T
Y
:
ADMIN.WORK
PR
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
S
E
N
I
O
R
SE
N
I
O
R
ITEMCOST
WO
R
K
IN
PR
O
J
E
C
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
HOURPER
IT
E
M
CH
A
R
G
E
M
A
N
A
G
E
R
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
TE
C
H
N
I
C
I
A
N
I
A
D
M
I
N
.
S
U
M
M
.
I
T
E
M
NO
.
W
O
R
K
I
T
E
M
HO
U
R
L
Y
R
A
T
E
:
$
1
8
5
$1
7
5
$1
2
5
$1
2
5
$
7
8
FI
N
A
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
2.
1
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
2
2
-
-
-
4 720$
2.
2
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
2
4
4
-
-
10 1,570$
2.
3
F
i
n
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
,
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
2
16
32
8
- 58 8,170$
2.
4
B
i
d
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
2
8
12
-
4
26 3,582$
Fi
n
a
l
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
:
8
30
48
8
4
9
8
14,042$
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
3.
1
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
2
16
32
-
-
5
0
7,170$
3.
2
R
e
c
o
r
d
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
1
2
2
3
1
9 1,238$
3.
3
O
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
8
32
-
-
4
1
5,585$
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
:
4
26
66
3
1
1
0
0
13,993$
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
O
T
A
L
:
12
56
11
4
11
5
1
9
8
28,035
Pr
i
n
t
i
n
g
=
25
0
$
26,270$
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
=
25
0
$
1,375$
DI
R
E
C
T
E
X
P
E
N
S
E
S
=
50
0
$
390$ 28,035$ 28,535$
G:
\
P
u
b
l
i
c
\
Y
o
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
\
20
1
5
\
Y
O
1
5
1
4
-
P
W
e
l
l
N
o
.
8 Rehabilitation\PSA\[Exhibit 3 - Level of Effort.xlsx]Fee Summary
Au
g
u
s
t
7
,
2
0
1
5
ES
T
I
M
A
T
E
O
F
L
E
V
E
L
O
F
E
F
F
O
R
T
A
N
D
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
D
C
O
S
T
F
O
R
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
F
O
R
EX
H
I
B
I
T
3
W
A
T
E
R
W
E
L
L
N
O
.
8
R
E
H
A
B
I
L
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
Un
i
t
e
d
C
i
t
y
o
f
Y
o
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
,
I
L
TOTAL EXPENSES =
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
=
LABOR SUMMARY
DI
R
E
C
T
E
X
P
E
N
S
E
S
PR
O
J
E
C
T
R
O
L
E
:
Drafting Expenses =
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
=
TO
T
A
L
L
A
B
O
R
E
X
P
E
N
S
E
S
=
WO
R
K
Ye
a
r
:
##
#
IT
E
M
M
o
n
t
h
:
NO
.
W
O
R
K
I
T
E
M
W
e
e
k
S
t
a
r
t
i
n
g
:
7
1
4
2
1
2
8
5
1
2
1
9
2
5
2
9
1
6
2
3
3
0
7
1
4
2
1
2
8
4
1
1
1
8
2
5
1
8
1
5
2
2
2
9
7
1
4
2
1
2
8
FI
N
A
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
2.
1
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
2.
2
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
2.
3
F
i
n
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
,
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
2.
4
B
i
d
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
3.
1
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
3.
2
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
R
e
c
o
r
d
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
3.
3
O
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
&
Q
C
/
Q
A
Me
e
t
i
n
g
(
s
)
De
s
i
g
n
Bi
d
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
EX
H
I
B
I
T
4
AN
T
I
C
I
P
A
T
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
W
A
T
E
R
W
E
L
L
N
O
.
8
R
E
H
A
B
I
L
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
UN
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
,
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
I
L
Au
g
u
s
t
7
,
2
0
1
5
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
20
1
5
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
M
a
r
c
h
February
Le
g
e
n
d
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
Oc
t
o
b
e
r
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Agenda Item Number
NB #2
Tracking Number
PW 2015-47
Rt 47 Improvements – Rt 71 to Caton Farm Road
Public Works Committee – August 18, 2015
Consideration of Approval
Resolution Consideration
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
IDOT is in the process of completing the Phase I report for the project. One of the items that
IDOT is requiring is the passing of the attached resolution, which confirms the Cities position on
the installation of shared-use paths in the area.
The City had previously reviewed this issue in February 2012 (see attached) and determined that
paths as a part of the Rt 47 project were not desired since other paths are planned nearby.
Staff is recommending approval of the resolution. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please let us know.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk
Date: August 7, 2015
Subject: Rt 47 Improvements (Rt 71 to Caton Farm Road)
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—February 28,2012—Page 10 of 13
City Administrator Olson stated the simple answer is there are different land specifications. You can tell
the developer as part of the plat to do a different grading plan. It seem like to him that this is more of a
matter of fact that the developer doesn't exist anymore and we missed our own bidding deadline to be
able to get this particular type of grading plan in there and then we figured it out after the fact. "This
would have been something that on site we would have given the developer a grading plan for the site and
said we need a sled hill and we need this area to be clay rather than it being whatever the standard slope
is for a park site in grass."Director of Park and Recreation Shraw stated typically follow that process and
the City takes ownership and starts mowing it and maintaining it immediately,which is a benefit for the
developer and it is a benefit for us. If not,the City makes that developer maintain that area for three years
until there is a good stand of grass. The City comes back later and does the improvement anyway.At this
point it is usually a win,win for the developer and the City and that is why the City worked with them,
but the City didn't have the option.Alderman Gilson stated the City doesn't want to play that safe and
wait and keep that$20,000 in our project fund until we get a developer that will pay for that. City
Administrator Olson stated no.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-1
Munns-aye, Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,
Milschewski-aye,Teeling-aye,Gilson-nay,Kot-aye
Route 47 Improvements—Rt. 71 to Caton Farm Road
PW 2012-20)
Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to authorize staff to send a response to IDOT as presented in the
memo from EEI Engineer Brad Sanderson dated February 16, 2012. So moved by Alderman Kot;
seconded by Alderman Funkhouser.
Alderman Gilson asked what the ramifications for denying or approving this now related to future
obligations for the City when it comes to the sidewalk placement. City Administrator Olson stated the
City is in the beginning of phase one, so based on past history this is the first step when the City tells
IDOT what Yorkville's plans show and what the City wants and then they come to us at the middle of
phase two for a letter of commitment.Knowing their time line on this,the City is probably 3 or 4 years
off from the middle of phase 2. EEI Engineer Sanderson stated they don't really have a plan for phase 2
yet,but he would say in the next 2 to 4 years. City Administrator Olson stated so they don't have funding
for phase 2. EEI Engineering Sanderson stated not that he is aware of.City Administrator Olson stated
typically their direction has been that as long as the City notifies them before phase 2 that there has not
been any request for reimbursement of funds on their behalf. EEI Engineering Sanderson stated correct.
Alderman Gilson asked if the City has to do this now if they haven't begun doing any engineering with
us. City Administrator Olson stated yes.They are going to do public hearings; they are going to start
doing design plans,they are going to prep documents for a letter of commitments down the road.They are
asking now for the City's direction on where the City would like sidewalks,bike paths, lighting,and etc.
Alderman Gilson asked what is the City's and staff's reasoning for denying sidewalks to the south side of
his ward via a major commercial area versus approving a bike path. Director of Park and Recreation
Shraw stated part of the reasoning is that it is a county parcel that the City would have to cross so the
County would have to agree to continue the sidewalk and then our actual connection is via the bike trail
up to 71 and then over to the commercial area then that way citizens are not crossing a major road without
any sort of pedestrian safety. Alderman Gilson asked if and when that area were to ever be developed
could there be potential for that developer to put a side walk in. EEI Engineer stated if a developer were
to come in and develop it then it would be required for them to have sidewalks on the City's side.
Alderman Gilson stated on the school districts projection for new schools,how is that relevant to all this.
EEI Engineer Brad Sanderson stated traffic. Alderman Gilson asked in regards to lighting where is that
proposed lighting. EEI Engineer Brad Sanderson stated according to state policy it is recommended in
transitional areas,and anywhere there is a raised medium. It is a fairly significant amount of lighting.
Alderman Gilson's last question was on the ditch versus the storm sewer.Where is the proposed open
ditch storm sewer plan?EEI Engineer Brad Sanderson stated no detailed plan has been provided. They
are proposing the urban section from route 71 down to Ament.They were generally looking for whether
or not the City would be interested in open ditches and eliminating storm sewers when possible.There are
no detailed plans.Alderman Spears had a question on item#4 and asked if the City should be a little
more specific that the proposed language be kept to a minimum. Public Works Director Dhuse stated that
would be more or less the intersection. The main thrust of this response was the fact of the medium
lighting. It was a tremendous cost and it would be our cost to bear at instillation. Alderman Spears stated
what if IDOT interprets that as the lighting that they originally wanted. Should the City be specific?EEI
Engineer Brad Sanderson stated we can add some additional text.
Mayor Golinski stated we are voting on a motion to approve this letter with the requested changes.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0
Spears-aye,Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye,
Teeling-aye,Gilson-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye
The purpose of this memo is to present draft responses to several items in which IDOT is seeking the
City’s feedback. Back on October 26, 2011 staff attended a Project Study Group meeting at IDOT
District 3 Headquarters in which the project was discussed. As you know, the project is currently within
the Phase I design process.
As a result of the meeting, the City was to respond to several items (listed below in italic). Based on
information and discussion with City staff, we have developed the following draft responses to those
items:
1. Determination of sidewalk placement south of Saravanos – E/W side of 47 and termination point.
City response: Additional sidewalk south of Saravanos Drive is not desired by the City (see
Exhibit A).
2. Determination of need for a shared-use path, north of Windett to 71.
City response: The City has plans for a shared-use path as noted in the attached Exhibit B,
therefore a separate path is not necessary.
3. School Districts projection for new schools in the study area, specifically a new High School.
City response: It is our understanding that the School District’s plans for an additional High
School located south of Route 71 have been placed on hold.
4. Determination on the City’s position on lighting. Lighting is required in areas of raised medians,
which is a local area cost.
City response: The City’s position is that that we are not currently in a fiscal position to fund the
lighting as recommended and any proposed lighting should be kept to a minimum.
5. General opinion on open ditch versus storm sewer.
City response: Generally, the City is open to the use of open ditch versus storm sewer.
Please place this on the February 21st Public Works Committee meeting agenda for discussion. If you
have any questions or require additional information, please let us know.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks & Recreation
Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk
Date: February 16, 2012
B
r
i
d
g
e
St a g e co ach
L e gio n
R
a
i
n
t
r
e
e
K i n g s m ill
S u t t o n
Fairfa
x
B
a
n
b
u
r
y
W in d ett R id g e
W
e
s
t
o
n
H a z e l t i n e
B o n nie
W
y
t
h
e
W
a
l
n
u
t
M
u
i
r
f
i
e
l
d
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
V
i
e
w
S
a
r
a
v
a
n
o
s
Fountainview
C
l
a
r
e
m
o
n
t
Phelps
Winter
thur
D
r
a
y
t
o
n
St J o s e p h's
Murfield
Candleberry
Meadow Rose
B a l t r u s o l
0200400 Feet
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
YO1104
YO1104-EXIST SW.MXD
H:/GIS/PUBLIC/YORKVILLE/2011
KKP
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL, 60560
(630) 553-7575
www.yorkville.il.us
ROUTE 47 SOUTH IMPROVEMENTS
YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS -PROPOSED MULTI-USE
PATHS
Legend
City Owned/Maintained Asphalt
County Trail
Private/Public Trail (HOA) Limestone
Proposed Conceptual
COMED TRAIL
R T 7 1
R
T
4
7
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Agenda Item Number
NB #3
Tracking Number
PW 2015-48
River Road/King Street Intersection
Public Works Committee – August 18, 2015
No Action
Stop Sign Installation Recommendations
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
As requested, we investigated the possible installation of a multi-way stop sign at the intersection of King
Street and River Road. Our findings are as follows:
Currently there is a stop sign at the approach on King Street.
Police records indicate that there have been no reported accidents at this location.
Generally, upon review of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), we feel
the intersection is not a good candidate for a multi-way stop sign installation, provided the sight
distance constraints are remediated.
At this time, we are in the process of locating the right-of-way lines at the intersection. Once identified,
we will then develop a plan to “clear” the intersection. This possibly could involve tree / brush removal,
retaining wall installation, changes in landscape material, etc.
The right-of-way should be able to be identified in the next couple of weeks.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk
Date: August 6, 2015
Subject: King Streetand River Road Stop SignAnalysis
River
Main
King
0100200
Feet
Engineering Enterprises
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
LOCATION MAP
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
August 2015
YO1107
YO1107-Location.mxd
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
KKP ³
Approx. Line of Sight
Required Line of Sight
290'335'
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
NB #4
Tracking Number
PW 2015-49
Traffic Control Requests
Public Works – August 18, 2015
N/A
Majority
Approval
See attached memo.
Bart Olson Administration
Name Department
Summary
Review of stop signs and yield sign placement at the corners of Alan Dale Lane and Yellowstone
Lane, and E Spring St and Freemont St.
Background
Both of these items were requested by Alderman Funkhouser. The Alan Dale Lane and
Yellowstone Lane intersection has been the subject of resident complaints about near-miss accidents as a
result of the placement of the yield signs (as opposed to a stop sign). The request from the resident is for
a 4-way stop sign at this intersection. No further information was given about E Spring St and Freemont
St.
Maps of both intersections have been included for your use. EEI has started the analysis of
intersection conditions, for purposes of making a recommendation on the need for additional or changed
traffic controls. Those analyses were not complete at time of packet creation, but will be available for
the September Public Works Committee meeting.
Recommendation
This is an informational item.
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Bart Olson, City Administrator
CC:
Date: August 13, 2015
Subject: Traffic Control Requests
Alice
Alan Dale
Yellowstone
Sumac
Denise
0100200
Feet
Engineering Enterprises
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
LOCATION MAP
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
August 2015
YO1107
YO1107-Location2.mxd
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
KKP ³
Existing Yield Sign
Existing Yield Sign
Spring
Freemont
Somonauk
Sanders
0100200
Feet
Engineering Enterprises
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
LOCATION MAP
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
August 2015
YO1107
YO1107-Location3.mxd
H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\
KKP ³
Existing Stop Sign
Existing Stop Sign
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
OB #1
Tracking Number
PW 2015-45
E-Waste Recycling
Public Works Committee – August 18, 2015
N/A
Majority
Approval
See attached memo
Bart Olson Administration
Name Department
Summary
Review of City’s e-waste recycling program.
Background
As discussed previously, the City’s e-waste recycling program at 610 Tower Lane has ended. A
few weeks ago, the Mayor and I met with members of the Yorkville Congregational Church’s Green
Committee. They presented some ideas and options for the City for its amended e-waste recycling
program. Members of the committee are expected to attend the Public Works Committee meeting to
listen to the discussion and provide feedback.
Public Works Director Dhuse and I have been discussing the implementation of a semi-annual
collection program. In this model, the City would contract with a hauler to set up and execute a pickup
event every other month or so during the Spring, Summer, and Fall seasons. We would expect this type
of a program to reduce the amount of abuse from commercial haulers and overnight fly-dumping.
Director Dhuse has been in touch with a couple haulers to get quotes. At time of packet creation, no
quotes had been provided. If they are available before the Public Works Committee meeting, they will
be presented at the meeting.
Recommendation
This is an informational item.
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Bart Olson, City Administrator
CC:
Date: August 13, 2015
Subject: E-waste reycling
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
OB #2
Tracking Number
PW 2015-43
Prestwick/Ashley Pointe Bond Call
Public Works – August 18, 2015
N/A
Majority
Approval
See attached memo.
Bart Olson Administration
Name Department
Summary
Review of Prestwick developer’s proposal for completion of all subdivision infrastructure in
exchange for early acceptance.
Background
This item was discussed at the July 28th City Council meeting. At that meeting, the City Council
was informed of a proposal by the subdivision developer to complete all subdivision infrastructure in
exchange for early acceptance of the infrastructure by the City. The punchlist of the remaining
infrastructure and proposed timeline for completion of said infrastructure is attached. In general, the
developer is proposing to complete all infrastructure this calendar year.
While formal inspections have not been completed, it is the staff’s best estimate that some of the
binder course in the subdivision has failed or is very close to failing. Failure of the binder course
requires a significant rehabilitation effort and would push the engineer’s estimate of probable
construction costs far beyond the current bond amount. It is recommended to make binder course
repairs and place final lift of asphalt on the streets before winter.
The City is not required to accept infrastructure until all infrastructure in an entire final plat unit
is completed. Additionally, the ordinance generally prevents developers from placing final lift of
asphalt on a street until the final plat unit is more than 75% built out. This provision prevents hundreds
of construction truck trips on the streets while the subdivision is being built out. Unfortunately, the
build out of most subdivisions has taken long enough that the useful life of the binder course is reached
before the 75% build out threshold.
It should further be noted that while the intersection improvements at Route 126 are not included
within the punch list, early acceptance proposal or bond amount, IDOT and the City are both requiring
those improvements to be completed before another building permit is issued.
Recommendation
Staff has reviewed the written proposal and timelines provided by the developer, and feel they
are reasonable. Staff recommends early acceptance of the subdivision infrastructure, contingent upon
the infrastructure being completed on time and to the City’s standards.
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Bart Olson, City Administrator
CC:
Date: August 13, 2015
Subject: Prestwick-Ashley Pointe Bond Call
This column
added by Stewart
as of 8/11/15,
pending city
acceptance of
work
This column added by Stewart
as of 8/11/15, pending city
acceptance of work
GENERAL ITEMS estimated
completion date proposed contractor(s)
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1COMPLETE AS-BUILT RECORD DRAWINGSLUMP SUM110,000.00 10,000.00 60 daysHR Green
2 INSTALL ROUTE 126/PENNMAN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS LUMP SUM 0 - -
3 REMOVE DEBRIS/GARBAGE LUMP SUM 1 - -
4EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MAINTENANCELUMP SUM137,500.00 37,500.00 completed
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - GENERAL $ 47,500.00
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
5STRUCTURE CLEANING/FILTER FABRIC REINSTALLATION ON OPEN GRATESLUMP SUM15,000.00 5,000.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
6CLEAN REMAINING STORM SEWER STRUCTURESLUMP SUM15,000.00 5,000.00 60 days Jensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
7CLEANING AND REPAIR OF STRUCTURE #374LUMP SUM12,000.00 2,000.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
8FILLET REPAIR EACH123125.00 15,375.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
9MORTAR MANHOLE/ GROUT PIPESEACH14125.00 1,750.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
10REPAIR ADJUSTING RINGSEACH22125.00 2,750.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
11BENCH REPAIR EACH9125.00 1,125.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
12READJUST FRAME EACH1125.00 125.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
13INSTALL MISSING RUNGSEACH2125.00 250.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
14RESET FRAME AND/OR ADJUSTING RINGSEACH1125.00 125.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
15TELEVISE STORM SEWERFOOT13,7892.00 27,578.00 60 daysCam-Vac
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - STORM $ 61,078.00
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
16STRUCTURE #214 REPAIRLUMP SUM1750.00$ 750.00$ 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
17REALIGN FRAME AND GRATEEACH1125.00 125.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
18MANHOLE REPAIRSEACH4750.00 3,000.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
19CHIMNEY SEAL REPLACEMENTEACH28300.00 8,400.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
20DEBRIS REMOVAL EACH2125.00 250.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
21REINSTALL MARKING POSTSEACH156100.00 15,600.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - SANITARY $ 28,125.00
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
22CLEAN AND PAINT FIRE HYDRANTSEACH16250.00$ 4,000.00$ 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
23ROTATE FIRE HYDRANTEACH1250.00 250.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
24LOCATE AUXILLARY VALVEEACH1250.00 250.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
25RAISE FIRE HYDRANTEACH1500.00 500.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
26PLUMB VALVE EACH1300.00 300.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
27VALVE REPAIR/REPLACEMENTEACH8750.00 6,000.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
28REPLACE VALVE EXTENSIONSEACH2250.00 500.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
29ADJUST VALVES TO GRADEEACH7250.00 1,750.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
30REALIGN FRAME EACH1125.00 125.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
31REINSTALL MARKING POSTSEACH156100.00 15,600.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - WATER MAIN $ 29,275.00
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
MAY 28, 2014
PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION - COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
C:\Users\bolson\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\F41SPEAE\PCE Completion Overall - May 2014
This column
added by Stewart
as of 8/11/15,
pending city
acceptance of
work
This column added by Stewart
as of 8/11/15, pending city
acceptance of work
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
MAY 28, 2014
PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION - COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
ROADWAY ITEMS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
32REMOVE WEEDS GROWING WITHIN ROADWAYLUMP SUM15,000.00 5,000.00 Completecomplete
33REMOVE AND REPLACE DAMAGED CURBFOOT11030.00 3,300.00 90 daysD Construction
34 BACKFILL BEHIND CURB FOOT 0 1.00 - Complete complete
35BINDER COURSE PATCHING (5% ASSUMED)SQ. YD.1,58645.00 71,370.00 90 daysD Construction
36BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (PRIME COAT)GAL9,5201.00 9,520.00 90 daysD Construction
37HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX C, N50TON2,74075.00 205,500.00 90 daysD Construction
38HOT-POURED JOINT SEALERPOUND6,3701.50 9,555.00 90 daysD Construction
39PAVEMENT STRIPINGLUMP SUM17,500.00 7,500.00 90 daysD Construction
40 INSTALL SIDEWALK SQ. FT.0 - - n/a n/a
41INSTALL SIGNS AND POSTSLUMP SUM15,000.00 5,000.00 90 daysD Construction
42STREET LIGHT REPAIRSLUMP SUM15,000.00 5,000.00 60 daysHerren Electric
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - ROADWAY $ 242,075.00
LANDSCAPING ITEMS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
43SITE MAINTENANCE/MOWINGLUMP SUM125,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 90 daysStewart
44TREE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENTEACH75225.00 16,875.00 90 daysStewart
45 PARKWAY TREE INSTALLATION EACH 0 - - n/s n/a
46BASIN MONITORING/REPAIRLUMP SUM150,000.00 50,000.00 60 daysStewart
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - LANDSCAPING $ 91,875.00
TOTAL ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 499,928.00
110% OF ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 549,920.80
C:\Users\bolson\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\F41SPEAE\PCE Completion Overall - May 2014
Summary
Overview of a request from Prestwick / Ashley Pointe developer for early acceptance of streets.
Background
At the July Public Works Committee meeting, committee reviewed a bond call recommendation
for the Prestwick subdivision. The current developer has not completed work in a timely manner, and
had not been responsive to staff requests for updates and work schedules. The developer attended the
meeting and indicated they would work with the staff to provide the requested materials in short order.
The Committee chose to defer the bond call request discussion until the August Public Works
Committee meeting.
During the discussion at the July meeting, the staff indicated that the binder course in the
subdivision is failing in several areas. As the pavement continues to fail, it becomes more likely that the
remaining bond funds will not cover the remaining infrastructure work in the subdivision. The
developer indicated that they would be willing to repair the binder course and put a final lift of asphalt in
the subdivision, as long as the City accepts the streets immediately upon completion. The developer had
requested this in 2013, and the request was declined by staff. The City has a policy not to allow final
lifts of asphalt to be placed until 75% of the subdivision is complete (there are currently only 4 homes in
Prestwick) or until the third year of subdivision buildout passes. In the past, the City has gone back and
forth on trying to defer acceptance on the roadways as long as possible vs. making sure that the binder
course doesn’t fail.
Recommendation
This is an informational item. The Public Works Committee simply wanted the entire City
Council to be aware that the Prestwick developer would be requesting to put the final lift of asphalt on a
subdivision with four homes in it and have the City accept ongoing maintenance of the roadway
thereafter. To the extent that the City Council had a strong opinion on early acceptance, we could advise
the developer accordingly. The City Staff has not had an ability to meet to discuss the request as of time
of packet creation. In general, we would prefer to make sure that the cost of completion of infrastructure
in the subdivision does not exceed the available bond funds.
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Bart Olson, City Administrator
CC:
Date: July 23, 2015
Subject: Prestwick / Ashley Pointe Development Update
This memo is to provide an update as to the status of the completion of the improvements.
The City is currently holding a bond in the amount of $559,753.20 (International Fidelity
Insurance Co. #ILIFSU0598131) for work to be completed within the development.
Staff has requested a completion schedule for the remaining work from the developer. At this
point, the developer has not provided the requested information or shown any proof of moving
forward.
There are significant outstanding work items as outlined in the attached punchlist letter dated
September 6, 2012 and latest cost estimate dated May 2014 as the developer has not completed
the work per the approved plan. In addition, the road binder course has deteriorated significantly
from the 2012 punchlist and staff is concerned that it will have to be replaced in its entirety.
Based on the amount of outstanding work and the lack of progress from the developer, staff is
recommending that the bond be called for the completion of the work.
Should the Public Works Committee be in favor of calling the bond for the subdivision, this
matter will then be placed on an upcoming City Council meeting agenda for further discussion
and consideration. Upon approvals, letters to the appropriate parties will be drafted and sent via
certified mail immediately.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk
Date: July 14, 2015
Subject: Prestwick / Ashley Pointe
GENERAL ITEMS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1 COMPLETE AS-BUILT RECORD DRAWINGS LUMP SUM 1 10,000.00 10,000.00
2 INSTALL ROUTE 126/PENNMAN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS LUMP SUM 0 - -
3 REMOVE DEBRIS/GARBAGE LUMP SUM 1 - -
4 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MAINTENANCE LUMP SUM 1 37,500.00 37,500.00
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - GENERAL $ 47,500.00
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
5 STRUCTURE CLEANING/FILTER FABRIC REINSTALLATION ON OPEN GRATES LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00 5,000.00
6 CLEAN REMAINING STORM SEWER STRUCTURES LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00 5,000.00
7 CLEANING AND REPAIR OF STRUCTURE #374 LUMP SUM 1 2,000.00 2,000.00
8 FILLET REPAIR EACH 123 125.00 15,375.00
9 MORTAR MANHOLE/ GROUT PIPES EACH 14 125.00 1,750.00
10 REPAIR ADJUSTING RINGS EACH 22 125.00 2,750.00
11 BENCH REPAIR EACH 9 125.00 1,125.00
12 READJUST FRAME EACH 1 125.00 125.00
13 INSTALL MISSING RUNGS EACH 2 125.00 250.00
14 RESET FRAME AND/OR ADJUSTING RINGS EACH 1 125.00 125.00
15 TELEVISE STORM SEWER FOOT 13,789 2.00 27,578.00
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - STORM $ 61,078.00
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
16 STRUCTURE #214 REPAIR LUMP SUM 1 750.00$ 750.00$
17 REALIGN FRAME AND GRATE EACH 1 125.00 125.00
18 MANHOLE REPAIRS EACH 4 750.00 3,000.00
19 CHIMNEY SEAL REPLACEMENT EACH 28 300.00 8,400.00
20 DEBRIS REMOVAL EACH 2 125.00 250.00
21 REINSTALL MARKING POSTS EACH 156 100.00 15,600.00
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - SANITARY $ 28,125.00
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
22 CLEAN AND PAINT FIRE HYDRANTS EACH 16 250.00$ 4,000.00$
23 ROTATE FIRE HYDRANT EACH 1 250.00 250.00
24 LOCATE AUXILLARY VALVE EACH 1 250.00 250.00
25 RAISE FIRE HYDRANT EACH 1 500.00 500.00
26 PLUMB VALVE EACH 1 300.00 300.00
27 VALVE REPAIR/REPLACEMENT EACH 8 750.00 6,000.00
28 REPLACE VALVE EXTENSIONS EACH 2 250.00 500.00
29 ADJUST VALVES TO GRADE EACH 7 250.00 1,750.00
30 REALIGN FRAME EACH 1 125.00 125.00
31 REINSTALL MARKING POSTS EACH 156 100.00 15,600.00
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - WATER MAIN $ 29,275.00
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
MAY 28, 2014
PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION - COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
G:\Public\Yorkville\2012\YO1216-DR Prestwick\Eng\PCE Completion Overall - May 2014.xls
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
MAY 28, 2014
PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION - COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
ROADWAY ITEMS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
32 REMOVE WEEDS GROWING WITHIN ROADWAY LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00 5,000.00
33 REMOVE AND REPLACE DAMAGED CURB FOOT 110 30.00 3,300.00
34 BACKFILL BEHIND CURB FOOT 0 1.00 -
35 BINDER COURSE PATCHING (5% ASSUMED)SQ. YD.1,586 45.00 71,370.00
36 BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (PRIME COAT)GAL 9,520 1.00 9,520.00
37 HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX C, N50 TON 2,740 75.00 205,500.00
38 HOT-POURED JOINT SEALER POUND 6,370 1.50 9,555.00
39 PAVEMENT STRIPING LUMP SUM 1 7,500.00 7,500.00
40 INSTALL SIDEWALK SQ. FT.0 - -
41 INSTALL SIGNS AND POSTS LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00 5,000.00
42 STREET LIGHT REPAIRS LUMP SUM 1 5,000.00 5,000.00
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - ROADWAY $ 242,075.00
LANDSCAPING ITEMS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
43 SITE MAINTENANCE/MOWING LUMP SUM 1 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$
44 TREE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT EACH 75 225.00 16,875.00
45 PARKWAY TREE INSTALLATION EACH 0 - -
46 BASIN MONITORING/REPAIR LUMP SUM 1 50,000.00 50,000.00
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - LANDSCAPING $ 91,875.00
TOTAL ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 499,928.00
110% OF ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 549,920.80
G:\Public\Yorkville\2012\YO1216-DR Prestwick\Eng\PCE Completion Overall - May 2014.xls
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
OB #3
Tracking Number
PW 2015-27
2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining Program
Public Works Committee – August 18, 2015
Consideration of Approval
Consideration of Change Order No. 1
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
The purpose of this memo is to present Change Order No. 1 for the above referenced project.
A Change Order, as defined by in the General Conditions of the Contract Documents, is a written order to
the Contractor authorizing an addition, deletion or revision in the work within the general scope of the
Contract Documents, or authorizing an adjustment in the Contract Price or Contract Time.
Background:
The United City of Yorkville and Visu-Sewer of Illinois, LLC entered into an agreement for a contract
value of $162,524.65 for the above referenced project. The intent of this project was to rehabilitate
various sewers using cured-in-place liners.
Questions Presented:
Should the City approve Change Order No. 1 which would increase the contract amount by $32,040.65?
Discussion:
The following discussion points address the items listed on Change Order No. 1:
Items 1 through 7 represent field installed quantities that vary from the bid. More specifically:
For items 2, 4, 6 and 7 the Contractor identified two lines that were 10” sewers and not 8” sewers
as originally shown on the atlas maps. The two sewers were lined with a 10” liner and paid at the
10” liner unit price.
Items 8, 10 and 12 are related to the Game Farm/Somonauk roadway improvements that the City is
currently constructing. The sanitary sewer on Somonauk between West St. and King St. was slated to be
removed and replaced; however the soil conditions were too poor for traditional removal and
replacement. The sewer and existing service were lined instead. This cost should be charged against the
Game Farm/Somonauk Street Project ($17,130.50).
Items 9 and 11 represent the labor and material cost to grout the heavy leaks that were identified by the
Contractor during the pre-lining cleaning and televising of the sewers. The grouting was necessary in
order to properly line the sewers.
The project is substantially complete. Change Order No. 1 will be the only change order presented
for consideration.
Action Required:
Consideration of approval of Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $32,040.65.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk
Date: August 12, 2015
Subject: 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining
CHANGE ORDER
Order No. 1
Date: August 11, 2015
Agreement Date: June 5, 2015
NAME OF PROJECT: 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining
OWNER: United City of Yorkville
CONTRACTOR: Visu-Sewer of Illinois, LLC
The following changes are hereby made to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:
1. Addition of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 10” (Area 1)
175 FT @ $28.50/FT $ 9,987.50
2. Deduction of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 8” (Area 2)
334 FT @ $24.30/FT $ (8,116.20)
3. Deduction of Remove Protruding Tap, (Area 2)
4 EA @ $10.00/EA $ (40.00)
4. Deduction of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 8” (Area 3)
303 FT @ $24.05/FT $ (7,287.15)
5. Deduction of Heavy Rood Cleaning (Area 3)
5 HR @ $375.00/HR $ (1,875.00)
6. Addition of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 10” (Area 2)
334 FT @ $28.50/FT $ 9,519.00
7. Addition of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 10” (Area 3)
332 FT @ $28.50/FT $ 9,462.00
8. Addition of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 9” (Somonauk)
388 FT @ $28.50/FT $ 11,058.00
9. Addition of Grout Joints (16 Total; Base Bid)
20 HR @ $385.00/HR (Labor) $ 7,700.00
10. Addition of Grout Joints (Somonauk)
5 HR @ $385.00/HR (Labor) $ 1,925.00
11. Addition of Grout Joints
56 GAL @ $10.00/GAL (Material) $ 560.00
12. Addition of 10”x6”x30” T-Liner (Somonauk)
1 LS @ $4,147.50 $ 4,147.50
Change of CONTRACT PRICE:
Original CONTRACT PRICE: $162,524.65
Current CONTRACT PRICE adjusted by previous CHANGE ORDER(S): $162,524.65
The CONTRACT PRICE due to this CHANGE ORDER will be (increased) (decreased)
by: $ 32,040.65
The new CONTRACT PRICE including this CHANGE ORDER will be: $194,565.30
Change to CONTRACT TIME:
The CONTRACT TIME will be (increased) (decreased) by 0 calendar days.
The date for completion of all work will be December 11, 2015
Justification
Items 1 through 7 represent field installed quantities that vary from the bid. More specifically:
For items 2, 4, 6 and 7 the Contractor identified two lines that were 10” sewers and not 8”
sewers as called out in the contract documents. The two sewers were lined with a 10” liner
and paid at the 10” liner unit price.
Items 8, 10 and 12 are related to the Game Farm/Somonauk roadway improvements the City is
currently constructing. The sanitary sewer on Somonauk between West St. and King St. was slated
to be removed and replaced; however the soil conditions were too poor for traditional removal and
replacement. The sewer and existing service were lined instead.
Items 9 and 11 represent the labor and material cost to grout the heavy leaks that were identified by
the Contractor during the pre-lining cleaning and televising of the sewers. The grouting was
necessary in order to properly line the sewers.
Approvals Required
Requested by: Visu-Sewer of Illinois, LLC
Recommended by: Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
Accepted by: United City of Yorkville
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.!.!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!!.!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.!!.
!!.
!!.!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
S
1
-
1
0
S
1
-
1
8
S
1
-
3
3
S
2
-
5
1
S
2
-
5
6
S
2
-
3
8
S
2
-
3
9
S
1
-
3
9
S
2
-
4
8
S
2
-
4
7
S
2
-
4
6
S
1
-
3
8
S
1
-
1
4
S
1
-
1
3
S
2
-
4
0
S
1
-
4
2
S
1
-
1
6
S
1
-
4
4
S
1
-
4
0
S
1
-
1
7
S
1
-
4
1
S
2
-
4
6
A
Mill St
W
F
o
x
S
t
S Bridge St
State St
S Main St
Heustis St E Fox St
Maple St
F
o
x
S
t
S
W Ridge St
Morgan St
E Orange StE Van Emmon St
Adrian St
W Madison St
Blaine St
F
o
x
b
o
r
o
D
r
White Oak Way
El
iz
ab
eth
S
t
E Washington St
River Birch Dr
Illini Dr
N
o
r
w
a
y
C
i
r
Adams St
J a m e sto w n D r
W Van Emmon St
W Or
ange St
Schoolhouse Rd
Olsen St Walter StE Hydraulic Ave E Ridge St
Spruce Ct
W Hydraulic Ave
W Dolph St
Fir Ct
Bell St
W
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
S
t
River Birch Ln
Tomasik Ct Benjamin St
W Beecher St
Jefferson St
Madison Ct
M a ple C t
W Hydraulic Ave
Morgan St
S Main St
W Dolph St
LEGEND !.SANITARY MANHOLE !!.MANHOLE LINING SANITARY SEWER AREA 1 LINING AREA 2 LINING AREA 3 LINING AREA 4 LINING
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
E
n
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
52
W
h
e
e
l
e
r
R
o
a
d
Su
g
a
r
G
r
o
v
e
,
I
l
l
i
n
o
i
s
6
0
5
5
4
(6
3
0
)
4
6
6
-
6
7
0
0
EXHIBIT 1 -LOCATION MAP
w
w
w
.
e
e
i
w
e
b
.
c
o
m
DA
T
E
DA
T
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
O
.
:
FI
L
E
:
PA
T
H
:
BY
:
Ap
r
i
l
2
0
1
5
YO
1
5
0
8
YO
1
5
0
8
_
E
x
h
1
.
M
X
D
H:
\
G
I
S
\
P
U
B
L
I
C
\
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
\
2
0
1
5
\
KK
P
NO
.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
³
Un
i
t
e
d
C
i
t
y
o
f
Y
o
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
80
0
G
a
m
e
F
a
r
m
R
o
a
d
Yo
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
,
I
L
6
0
5
6
0
63
0
-
5
5
3
-
4
3
5
0
w
w
w
.
y
o
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
.
i
l
.
u
s
0400800
20
0
Feet
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
OB #4
Tracking Number
PW 2015-15
Game Farm Road and Somonauk Street Project - Update
Public Works Committee – August 18, 2015
Verbal update will be given at meeting.
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department