City Council Packet 2015 08-25-15
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, August 25, 2015
Call to Order:
Pledge of Allegiance:
Roll Call by Clerk: WARD I WARD II WARD III WARD IV
Carlo Colosimo Jackie Milschewski Chris Funkhouser Diane Teeling
Ken Koch Larry Kot Joel Frieders Seaver Tarulis
Establishment of Quorum:
Amendments to Agenda:
Presentations:
1. Aurora Area Convention & Visitors Bureau Update
2. CMAP Shared Services Study
Public Hearings:
Citizen Comments on Agenda Items:
Consent Agenda:
1. PW 2015-46 Well No. 9 Rehabilitation – Professional Services Agreement – Design and
Construction Engineering - authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
2. PW 2015-47 Resolution Declining City of Yorkville Funding and Maintenance Participation of Bicycle
Accommodations along Illinois Route 47 (Bridge Street), Between Caton Farm Road and Illinois
Route 71 in Yorkville – authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
3. PW 2015-43 Resolution Approving Early Acceptance of Certain Improvements of the Prestwick/Ashley
Pointe Subdivision – authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
4. PW 2015-27 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining – Change Order No. 1 – authorize the Mayor to execute
5. ADM 2015-40 Monthly Treasurer’s Report for July 2015
Minutes for Approval:
1. Minutes of the Regular City Council – July 28, 2015
Bills for Payment (Informational): $902,820.04
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
Telephone: 630-553-4350
www.yorkville.il.us
City Council Agenda
August 25, 2015
Page 2
Mayor’s Report:
1. CC-2015-63 Appointment of Freedom of Information Officer – Nicole Kathman
Public Works Committee Report:
1. PW 2015-44 Blackberry Woods Cash Deposit Call
Economic Development Committee Report:
Public Safety Committee Report:
Administration Committee Report:
Park Board:
Plan Commission:
1. PC 2015-14 County Case 15-13 (1211 Game Farm Road) – 1.5 Mile Review
Zoning Board of Appeals:
1. ZBA 2015-03 Lot 19 Commercial Drive (Lot Coverage Variance) – Ordinance Granting a Lot
Coverage Variance for a Public Storage Facilities/MiniWarehouse Storage
(Lot 19 of Unit 3 Yorkville Business Center Subdivision)
City Council Report:
City Clerk’s Report:
Community and Liaison Report:
Staff Report:
Additional Business:
Executive Session:
Citizen Comments:
Adjournment:
COMMITTEES, MEMBERS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
ADMINISTRATION: September 16, 2015 – 6:00 p.m. – City Hall Conference Room
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman Milschewski Finance Library
Vice-Chairman: Alderman Frieders Administration
Committee: Alderman Teeling
Committee: Alderman Tarulis
City Council Agenda
August 25, 2015
Page 3
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: September 1, 2015 – 6:00 p.m. – City Hall Conference Room
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman Koch Community Development Plan Commission
Vice-Chairman: Alderman Teeling Building Safety and Zoning Yorkville Econ. Dev. Corp.
Committee: Alderman Colosimo Kendall Co. Plan Commission
Committee: Alderman Funkhouser
PUBLIC SAFETY: September 3, 2015 – 6:30 p.m. – City Hall Conference Room
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman Kot Police School District
Vice-Chairman: Alderman Frieders
Committee: Alderman Colosimo
Committee: Alderman Tarulis
PUBLIC WORKS: September 15, 2015 – 6:00 p.m. – City Hall Conference Room
Committee Departments Liaisons
Chairman: Alderman Funkhouser Public Works Park Board
Vice-Chairman: Alderman Milschewski Engineering YBSD
Committee: Alderman Kot Parks and Recreation
Committee: Alderman Koch
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
WORKSHEET
CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, August 25, 2015
7:00 PM
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMENDMENTS TO AGENDA:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESENTATIONS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Aurora Area Convention & Visitors Bureau Update
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CMAP Shared Services Study
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSENT AGENDA:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. PW 2015-46 Well No. 9 Rehabilitation – Professional Services Agreement – Design and Construction
Engineering
□ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________
□ Removed ________________________________________________________________________
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. PW 2015-47 Resolution Declining City of Yorkville Funding and Maintenance Participation of Bicycle
Accommodations along Illinois Route 47 (Bridge Street), Between Caton Farm Road and Illinois
Route 71 in Yorkville
□ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________
□ Removed ________________________________________________________________________
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. PW 2015-43 Resolution Approving Early Acceptance of Certain Improvements of the Prestwick/Ashley
Pointe Subdivision
□ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________
□ Removed ________________________________________________________________________
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. PW 2015-27 2015-27 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining – Change Order No. 1
□ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________
□ Removed ________________________________________________________________________
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. ADM 2015-40 Monthly Treasurer’s Report for 2015
□ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________
□ Removed ________________________________________________________________________
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MINUTES FOR APPROVAL:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Minutes of the Regular City Council – July 28, 2015
□ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________
□ Removed ________________________________________________________________________
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BILLS FOR PAYMENT:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Bills for Payment (Informational)
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAYOR’S REPORT:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CC 2015-63 Appointment of Freedom of Information Officer – Nicole Kathman
□ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________
□ Removed ________________________________________________________________________
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. PW 2015-44 Blackberry Woods Cash Deposit Call
□ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________
□ Removed ________________________________________________________________________
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLAN COMMISSION:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. PC 2015-14 County Case 15-13 (1211 Game Farm Road) – 1.5 Mile Review
□ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________
□ Removed ________________________________________________________________________
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. ZBA 2015-03 Lot 19 Commercial Drive (Lot Coverage Variance) - An Ordinance Granting a Lot
Coverage Variance for a Public Storage Facilities/MiniWarehouse Storage (Lot 19 of Unit 3 Yorkville
Business Center Subdivision)
□ Approved: Y ______ N ______ □ Subject to __________________________________________
□ Removed ________________________________________________________________________
□ Notes _____________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CITIZEN COMMENTS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
Presentation #1
Tracking Number
Aurora Area Convention & Visitors Bureau Update
City Council – August 25, 2015
Bart Olson Administration
Name Department
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
Presentation #2
Tracking Number
CMAP Shared Services Study
City Council – August 25, 2015
Bart Olson Administration
Name Department
[Municipality], Illinois
Resolution # ___________
A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT A SHARED SERVICES STUDY CREATED WITH
ASSISTANCE FROM CMAP BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF OSWEGO, VILLAGE OF
MONTGOMERY, AND THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
WHEREAS, the [municipality] recognizes the value of coordination with neighboring
communities on issues of mutual interest;
WHEREAS, the [municipality]—along with the [municipal partners]—worked together, with
technical assistance from the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP), on the Lower
Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study; and
WHEREAS, the President and [Village Board of Trustees of municipality] approved Resolution
# _____ on _____, 2015 in support of this project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF OSWEGO, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1: the President and [Village Board of Trustees] accept the Lower Fox River
Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study;
Section 2: the President and [Village Board of Trustees] agree to join the Village of
Montgomery and the United City of Yorkville in a partnership known as the
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative to share programs and services when both
feasible and desirable; and
Section 3: the [municipality] believes that the partnership will provide potential benefits to
the efficiency of municipal operations.
SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE
This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.
APPROVED: __________________________________
for the Village of Oswego, Village of Montgomery,
and United City of Yorkville
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative
Shared Services Study
DRAFT DOCUMENT FOR INTERNAL REVIEW ONLY
JULY 30, 2015
Unless otherwise specified, all photos are by CMAP staff.
Funding Acknowledgement
This project was supported through the Chicago Metropolitan Agency
for Planning’s (CMAP) Local Technical Assistance (LTA) program,
which is funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA),
Federal Transit Administration (FTA), U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD), Illinois Department of Transportation
(IDOT), and the Chicago Community Trust. The Metropolitan Mayors
Caucus (MMC) and CMAP would like to thank these funders for their
support for this project.
Acknowledgements
Advisory Committee:
Christina Burns, Assistant Village Administrator, Village of Yorkville
Steve Jones, Former Village Administrator, Village of Oswego
Bart Olson, City Administrator, United City of Yorkville
Jeff Zoephel, Village Administrator, Village of Montgomery
Additional thanks to:
Carrie Hansen, Interim Village Administrator, Village of Oswego
Mark Horton, Finance Director, Village of Oswego
Justin VanVooren, Director of Finance, Village of Montgomery
Krysti Barksdale-Noble,
Community Development Director, United City of Yorkville
Jerad Chipman, Senior Planner, Village of Montgomery
Chris Heinen, Planner, United City of Yorkville
Tom Pahnke, Building and Zoning, Village of Oswego
Richard Young,
Director of Community Development, Village of Montgomery
Rod Zenner, Community Development Director, Village of Oswego
Jeff Burgner, Chief of Police, Village of Oswego
Richard Hart, Chief of Police, United City of Yorkville
Larry Hilt, Deputy Chief, United City of Yorkville
Terry Klingel, Deputy Chief, United City of Yorkville
Dan Meyers, Chief of Police, Village of Montgomery
Armando Sanders, Deputy Chief, Village of Montgomery
Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works, United City of Yorkville
Jennifer Hughes, Director of Public Works, Village of Oswego
Mike Pubentz, Director of Public Works, Village of Montgomery
Mark Runyon, Assistant Director of Public Works, Village of Oswego
Jerry Weaver, Utility Services Director, Village of Oswego
Table of Contents
Chapter 1: An Introduction to Shared Services 4
Purpose and Scope of the Study 6
Relationship with the GO TO 2040 Regional Comprehensive Plan 6
What is a Shared Service? 7
Chapter 2: The Case for Shared Services 8
Benefits of Shared Services 10
Commitment to Efficient Governance 11
Shared Regional Contexts 12
Chapter 3: Process for Developing the Partnering Initiative 20
Guiding Principles 22
Process Overview 22
Chapter 4: Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations 26
Overall Goals for Shared Services 28
Administration and Finance Prioritized Actions 29
Community Development Prioritized Actions 35
Public Safety Prioritized 40
Public Works 44
Chapter 5: Joint Planning Opportunities 48
Invest in a New Technologies 50
Conduct Joint Water Supply and Wastewater Treatment Planning 50
Jointly Implement Bicycle and Pedestrian Trail Network 52
Chapter 6: Sustaining the Initiative 54
Evaluating the Initiative 56
Lessons Learned 59
Chapter 7: Next Steps 64
Engaging Elected Officials 66
Align Shared Service Efforts with other Planning Priorities 67
Connecting with Regional Partners 67
Appendix A: Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville Contract Alignment Analysis 68
Appendix B: Case Studies 74
Case Study 1: Municipal Partnering Initiative (MPI) 75
Case Study 2: DuPage MPI 80
Case Study 3: South Suburban Code Enforcement 83
Appendix C: Workshop Materials 86
Goal-Setting and Visioning Workshop List of Services by Department 87
Visioning Workshop Exercise 89
Prioritization Workshop 90
April Roundtable Exchange Group Discussion Worksheet 91
3
Chapter 1
An Introduction to
Shared Services
An Introduction to Shared Services
Local governments play an important role in
maintaining quality of life for communities. From
cleaning out sewer pipes to repaving aging roads,
they perform many critical functions. In order to
ensure the delivery of high quality services to
residents in the face of budget cuts and economic
hardships, local governments are expanding
opportunities for shared service delivery to
improve the efficiency of government operations.
This multijurisdictional project provided technical
assistance to the Village of Oswego, Village
of Montgomery, and United City of Yorkville
to identify opportunities for sharing municipal
services. The Study includes a number of
recommendations for shared service projects
and has already led to the creation of the Lower
Fox River Partnering Initiative that will oversee
long-term cooperation among the communities.
The Study is the result of collaboration between
municipal staff from the communities and the
Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning
(CMAP). By exploring shared services, the three
communities are providing strong leadership for
improving efficiency of local governments across
the region.
5An Introduction to Shared Services
This Study documents the communities’ process of establishing the Lower
Fox River Partnering Initiative and provides specific recommendations
for the communities to implement shared services. The Study also
synthesizes best practices for shared services based on the experiences of
other municipal partnerships. The lessons learned from regional examples
should not only inform the efforts of the three communities, but also
provide guidance to other municipalities interested in shared services
across the region.
This Study focuses on sharing opportunities between the three local
governments only, rather than shared services between other levels of
government, such as counties, and other taxing bodies, such as school
districts or park districts.
This Study does not recommend any consolidation of any kind. The
findings of the Study aim to increase the quality and efficiency of
municipal service delivery, and are not intended to lead to municipal or
departmental consolidation, staff layoffs, or reduced quality of service for
the communities’ residents.
CMAP developed and now guides the implementation of GO TO 2040,
metropolitan Chicago’s long-range regional plan. To address anticipated
population growth of more than 2 million new residents, GO TO
2040 establishes coordinated strategies that will help the region’s 284
communities address transportation, housing, economic development,
open space, the environment, and other quality of life issues. The GO TO
2040 plan strives to balance the need for local autonomy and regional
cooperation. It provides principles that municipalities and counties can
apply to decide how and where development should happen or which
infrastructure investments to prioritize in their communities. The
plan recommends supporting local planning through grant programs,
infrastructure investments to implement plans, technical assistance, and
collaboration between municipalities on shared priorities.
The Plan contains four themes and 12 major recommendation areas:
• Livable Communities
• Human Capital
• Efficient Governance
• Regional Mobility
Achieving regional goals for governance efficiency requires significant
innovation and coordination at the local level. GO TO 2040 states that
“one community, or even a single level of government, cannot solve our
most pressing problems alone. Though northeastern Illinois is a large and
diverse region, our communities are interdependent and our leaders will
have to work across geographic borders to create sustainable prosperity.”
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville are addressing GOTO 2040’s
recommendations for increasing the efficiency of local governments by
promoting strategic coordination to efficiently deliver high-quality services
to residents.
Purpose and Scope of the Study
Relationship with the GO TO 2040
Regional Comprehensive Plan
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study6
What is a Shared Service?
Intergovernmental cooperation is not a new phenomenon, but it often
occurs informally or on an ad hoc basis. This study provides a framework
by which the three communities can formally share services on an ongoing
basis.
Shared services can take many forms. Shared service initiatives can
be distinguished by the scale of governments involved. Vertical service
sharing is when a higher level of government provides a service to the
units of government below it. Counties, for instance, may provide services
for the municipalities within their boundaries. Horizontal service sharing—
the main focus of this study—occurs across multiple entities at the same
level of government.
There are multiple ways to structure shared services. Shared activities
involve the mutual undertaking of municipal operations or functions.
Examples of shared activities include use agreements to share equipment
or staff and coordinated implementation of a program across multiple
communities, such as a shared gang unit task force.
Joint procurement is when multiple municipalities develop and execute a
single bid to a vendor to provide a service. When communities combine
needs through joint bids, they may be able to achieve an economy of scale
to purchase goods or services at a lower cost than if each of them were
to bid separately. Vendors can include private companies and other local
governments.
Shared service agreements can take the form of contracts, memoranda of
understanding, intergovernmental agreements, policy documents, or even
the formation of a new position or department. Some agreements require
governing body resolutions to pass while others lend themselves to less
formal documented agreements, or can be budgeted and implemented at
the departmental level alongside other non-shared services.
7An Introduction to Shared Services
Chapter 2
The Case for Shared Services
The Case for Shared Services
The motivation for municipalities to share services
can come from a variety of driving forces. In many
places, greater public demand for transparency
in public spending and fiscal constraints have
encouraged local governments to increase the
efficiency of their operations. Some seek shared
agreements to offset costs when assets are
underutilized. Given fiscal uncertainties from
the economic recession and statewide budget
concerns, Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville are
using this study to demonstrate commitment to
efficient governance and to explore innovations
in service delivery. The three communities are
particularly well-suited to share services due
to similarities in demographic make-up, growth
patterns, and geographical characteristics. Their
mutual identities as Lower Fox River communities
provide a strong foundation for the Partnering
Initiative.
9The Case for Shared Services
1 Institute for Local Government. “The Importance
of Written Agreements.” http://www.ca-ilg.org/
post/importance-written-agreements.
Maintaining high levels of service in the face of rising
costs can be challenging. Shared services are attractive
for local governments because they can have wide-
ranging benefits, several of which are identified below.
• Save and control costs. Municipalities can
potentially reduce costs of service delivery by
achieving economies of scale when they share
services.
• Increase quality of service delivery. Local
governments may be able to carry out existing
services at a higher level by sharing the costs and
labor of service delivery.
• Expand scope of service delivery. When
municipalities pool their resources, expertise,
equipment, and capacities, they may also be able
to provide more services than what they could do
individually.
• Increase efficiency. Many communities share
common corridors and infrastructure systems, but
their municipal services end at political boundaries.
Governments can increase the efficiency of these
activities when they are carried out jointly across
contiguous areas.
• Formalize arrangements. Individual municipal
staff members may enjoy good relationships with
their counterparts in adjacent municipalities. Many
even have informal arrangements in place to share
services. Formalized shared service initiatives allow
municipalities to clearly define expectations, liability,
financial responsibility, and intent of the partners,
as well as provide clarity when staff changes
occur. Shared service agreements provide written
descriptions of how the service will be implemented
in practice, as well as provisions for dispute
resolution and out-clauses.1
• Improve public relations. Taxpayers want to
know that their tax dollars are being spent wisely
and efficiently. Municipal leaders can demonstrate
commitment to fiscal responsibility by implementing
more efficient governance practices. Municipalities
that share services cite strong public support for
their initiatives.
• Increase regional cooperation. The process for
sharing services requires significant collaboration
among neighboring communities. Over time,
municipalities can use shared services to build
relationships and trust with their neighbors in other
areas of governance and planning.
Benefits of Shared Services
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study10
Commitment to Efficient Governance
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville have undertaken several relevant
planning efforts in recent years that identify common goals relating to
governance efficiency. The plans include many recommendations for
improving municipal services and provide impetus for conducting this
Shared Services Study.
• Oswego’s 2012-2017 Strategic Plan, which guides Village operations, calls
for efficient municipal governance and services as a primary goal. This
goal includes eighteen objectives that from adopting fiscally responsible
practices in municipal operations to encouraging innovation and cross-
departmental collaboration. This strategy is particularly important
for enabling staff to think in new ways about service delivery and
cooperation.
• Montgomery’s 2014 Comprehensive Plan calls for the establishment of a
“Joint Services Council” of service provider representatives to improve
cooperation and efficiency of service delivery.
• Yorkville’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan vision statement aims to “creat[e]
systems for routine collaboration among and between organizations that
influence City goals.” Furthermore, one of Yorkville’s land use goals is to
improve cooperation and coordination of planning documents between
Yorkville and “other municipalities, counties, and regional planning
bodies,” setting the stage for collaboration on broader planning efforts in
addition to day-to-day service delivery.
The municipalities also have a long history of working together. For
example, they have boundary agreements in place that allow neighboring
municipalities the right to review proposed developments within a
quarter mile of municipal borders. As another example, the Villages
of Oswego and Montgomery, along with the Oswegoland Park District,
the Oswego Community School District #308, the Oswego Public
Library District, and the Conservation Foundation, completed a Green
Community Vision Plan to guide environmental activities in the area.
The two-year process resulted in an environmental vision statement with
seven priority goals, action steps, and timelines for achieving the shared
vision. Since the plan’s adoption, both municipalities have implemented
several of its recommendations through environmental commissions and
environmentally friendly development strategies.
More recently in 2013, Oswego and Montgomery attempted a joint waste
hauling bid. Ultimately, the communities were not able to agree upon
certain specifications, including the hauling schedule, and decided to
pursue separate bids. The process of collectively building the Lower Fox
River Partnering Initiative through this project allowed the communities
to step back and establish a foundation for collaboration that can support
future shared service efforts.
11The Case for Shared Services
Aurora
Route 59 Naperville
Aurora
Batavia
Big
Rock
Bolingbrook
Channahon
Crest
Hill
Hinckley
Joliet
Kaneville
Lisbon
Lisle
Millbrook
Millington
Minooka
Montgomery
Naperville
Newark
North
Aurora
Oswego
Plainfield
Plano
Plattville
Rockdale
Romeoville
Sandwich
Sheridan
Shorewood
Somonauk
Sugar Grove
Warrenville
Waterman
Wheaton
Yorkville
§¨¦88
§¨¦80
§¨¦55
FoxRiver
Lit
t
leRock
Creek F o x R i ver
R o b R o y Creek
R
o
o
d
s
C
r
e
e
k
Middle
A
u
x
S
a
b
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
Lisbon C
r
eek
Blackberr
y
Creek
WestAuxSab l e C r e e k
ValleyRunCreek
E
a
s
t
A
u
x
SableCreek
MorganCr e ek
Bi
g
Ro ckCreek
AuxSable
C
r
e
e
k
C
l
e
a
r
C
r
e
e
k
De
K
a
l
b
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ka
n
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
DeKalb
County
Kendall
County
DeKalb County
La Salle County
Kane
County
DuPage
County
Kane County
Kendall County
DuPage County
Will County
Wi
l
l
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ke
n
d
a
l
l
C
o
u
n
t
y
Kendall
County
La
Salle
County
BLISSRD
E N E W Y O R K S T
IL-126
S
WAS
H
I
N
G
T
ON
ST
P
L
A
I
N
F
I
E
L
D
RD
BATAVIA
RD
W DIEHL R D
LIONS RD
D I EHL R D
O G D E N A V E
111TH ST
W GALENA BLVD
GALENA RD
S
D
R
A
U
D
E
N
R
D
N
MILL
ST
PRAIRIE ST
MCDONOUGH ST
75TH ST
E D IEHL R D
U S -3 4
W BLACK RD
B U TT ER FIELD RD
US-30
N
W
E
B
E
R
R
D
S
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
HERRICK
RD
103RD ST
W INDIAN TRA IL RD
FER R Y R D
W 127TH ST
W W O L F S R D
NAPERVILLERD
W C H U R C H S T
95TH ST
83RD ST
U S -3 0
HART
ER
R
D
A U R O R A AVE
US-6
E
2351ST
RD
I L -7 1
E
3
0
T
H
R
D
S
W
E
B
E
R
R
D
US-34
GALENA BL
V
D
H
ILL
A
V
E
ST
E
W
A
R
T
R
D
104TH ST
US-52
S
W EST
S
T
N 4 2 5 1 S T RD
W TAYLOR RD
E RENWICK RD
MITCHELL
RD
M A I N S T
IL
-
5
9
W O L F S C R O S S I N G R D
LI
N
E
R
D
S
R
O
U
T
E
5
9
J E R I C H O R D
IL-31
SCOTT RD
CANNON B A L L T R L
US-52
W 111TH ST
8 7 T H ST
SUYDAM RD
TANNER RD
S
C
O
U
N
T
Y
L
I
N
E
R
D
AUCUTT RD
S
I
L
-
5
9
HA
R
V
E
Y
R
D
DA
V
I
S
R
D
W B O U G H T O N R D
GR
O
V
E
R
D
E C H I C A G OA V E
L
IT
T
L
E
ROCKRD
ROGERS RD
W MA
I
N
S
T
CHICAGO RD
SIMONS RD
N 38TH RD
E
2
7
5
0
T
H
R
D
SWAN
RD
CANTON FARM RD
N 41ST RD
S
R
I
V
E
R
R
D
DO
U
G
L
A
S
R
D
CATON FARM RD
E
SANDWIC
H
R
D
NEWARK RD
WALKER RD
N 42ND RD
N
EOLA
RD
DU
G
A
N
R
D
SOMONAUK
RD
ORCHARD
RD
WE
B
E
R
R
D
RANDALLRD
BO
O
K
R
D
S
EOLA
RD
ES
S
I
N
G
T
O
N
R
D
N
L
A
R
K
I
N
A
V
E
N
FARNSWORTH
AVE
HO
U
B
O
L
T
R
D
DA
U
B
E
R
M
A
N
R
D
I
L
-
2
5
G R A N A R T R D
ASHE
RD
S
2
4
8
T
H
A
V
E
RI
D
G
E
R
D
5T
H
S
T
CL
A
RK
RD
N
L
A
K
E
S
T
R OCK
CREEK R D
IL
-
2
3
F
OXRIVER D R
T
O
W
N
H
O
U
S
E
R
D
E
2603RD
R
D
NE
F
R
O
N
T
A
G
E
R
D
HART
RD
EL
D
A
M
A
I
N
R
D
Source: chicago metropolitan agency for planning, 2014.
County Boundary
Water
Montgomery
Oswego
Yorkville
Forest Preserve
Other Municipalities
Metra Rail Lines
I2 Metra Stations
0 2.5 51.25
Miles
I1:200,000
!
!
!
Aux Sable
Township
OswegoYorkville
Montgomery
Chicago
Will
Cook
Kane
LakeMcHenry
Kendall
DuPage
Grundy
Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, 2014
Figure 2.1: Regional Location
12
The shared characteristics of the three communities make them natural
partners for shared services. Located about 50 miles west of Chicago along
the Fox River, Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville have been shaped by
similar geographic and historic contexts.
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville were first settled in the early 1830s
and incorporated in the mid-nineteenth century when the region’s
population expanded west to form what are now Kane and Kendall
Counties. The history of these communities is closely tied to the
development of regional rail and road networks along the Fox River. These
expansions strengthened access for commuters between Aurora and the
Oswego-Montgomery-Yorkville area, and created economic corridors that
form the foundation of the region’s commercial activities today.
Throughout the twentieth century, several companies, including
Caterpillar, Dial, Western Electric, and Wrigley located facilities in the area.
That commercial growth has contributed to rapid population growth and
development. Montgomery now has a population of 18,440, representing a
230% increase from 2000. In the same timeframe, Yorkville grew by 170%
to 16,920 residents. Oswego, the largest of the three with 30,355 residents,
has grown by 130% in the last decade. While rates of population increase
have slowed due to the national economic recession, the municipalities
continue to grow today.
The communities now face the challenge of providing high quality services
to their expanding residential populations. All of the municipalities
strive to maintain tight-knit community identities while accommodating
growth. The communities envision a future in which development does
not outpace quality of service provision to their growing residential
populations. Montgomery’s Comprehensive Plan, for instance, articulates a
vision of keeping a “warm, small-town atmosphere” as it develops through
sustainable growth practices. Similarly, Oswego’s Downtown Framework
Plan vision statement expresses the desire to retain the historic charm of
Main Street while also attracting new development to the neighborhood.
The rapid growth patterns of Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville have
also led to irregular municipal boundaries. The communities’ intertwined
borders lend themselves to service coordination, especially for services
that are determined by physical geography. For instance, the communities
can gain efficiencies by collaborating on services like snow removal and
mowing, rather than conducting services strictly within municipal borders.
As suburban communities with significant potential for new development,
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville have an opportunity to coordinate
municipal services and planning to ensure sustainable growth and
development. With cooperation, the communities can better balance the
demands of growth on their public infrastructure, water, land, and other
shared resources.
Shared Regional Contexts
13The Case for Shared Services
DuPage
Will
DuPage
Ka
n
e
Wil
l
K
endall
Kane
Kendall
AuroraBig Rock
Joliet
Montgomery
Oswego
Plainfield
Plano
Sugar Grove
Yorkville
Fox Ri v e r
M o r g an Creek
Fox R i v e r
Wauba n s e e Creek
Rob
R
oy
Creek
EastAux S a b l eCreek
Ro b R oyCr eek
M i d d le A u x S a b l e C r e e k
BigRockCree k
Blackb e r r y C r e ek
IL-126
MO N T G O M E R Y R D
PLAINFIELD
R
D
US-3
4
G R A N A R T RD
SBRO AD W AY
RANCE RD
E
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
IL-71
W W O L F S R D
US-30
LI
N
E
R
D
S L
A
K
E
S
T
HI
L
L
A
V
E
ST
E
W
A
R
T
R
D
E S O U T H ST US-34
J E R I C H O R D
S
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
IL
-
3
1
OGD
E
N
A
V
E
CANNO N B A L L T R L
US-3
4
GALENA RD
W 127TH ST
W 111TH ST
HA
R
V
E
Y
R
D
RI
D
G
E
R
D
LITTLE
ROC
K
RD
SIMONS RD
DU
G
A
N
R
D
DO
U
G
L
A
S
R
D
WALKER R D
OR
C
H
A
R
D
R
D
S
C
O
U
N
T
Y
L
I
N
E
R
D
5T
H
S
T
I
L
-
2
5
AS
H
E
R
D
S
H
E
G
G
S
R
D
C
LARK
RD
ROCK
CREEK R D
FOX RIVER D R
ELDAMAINRD
S
EOLA
RD
M
IL
L
B
R
O
O
K
R
D
Source: chicago metropolitan agency for planning, 2014.
County Boundary
Montgomery
Oswego
Yorkville
Other Municipalities
Unincorporated
Forest Preserve
Water
0 21
Miles
I1:100,000
Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, 2014
Figure 2.2 Study Area
14 Document Title Goes Here
DuPage
Will
Du
P
a
g
e
Ka
n
e
Wi
l
l
Ke
n
d
a
l
l
Kane
Kendall
Aurora
Joliet
Montgomery
Oswego
Plainfield
Plano
Sugar Grove
Yorkville
Fox Ri v e r
MorganCreek
Fox River
Wauba n s e e Creek
Rob
R
oy
Creek
EastAux S a b l eCreek
R o b R oyC r eek
M i d d le A u x S a b l e C r e e k
B igRockCree k
Blackb e r r y C r e ek
IL-126
MO N T G O M E R Y R D
PLAINFIELD
R
D
US-34
G R A N A R T RD
SBROAD W AY
RANCE RD
E
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
IL-71
W W O L F S R D
US-30
LI
N
E
R
D
S L
A
K
E
S
T
HI
L
L
A
V
E
ST
E
W
A
R
T
R
D
E S O U T H ST US-34
W O L F S C R O S S I N G R D
J E R I C H O R D
S
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
IL
-
3
1
U
S
-
3
0
OGD
E
N
A
V
E
CANNO N B A L L T R L
GALENA RD
W 127TH ST
W 111TH ST
AUCUTT RD
HA
R
V
E
Y
R
D
RI
D
G
E
R
D
LITTLE
ROC
K
RD
SIMONS RD
DU
G
A
N
R
D
DO
U
G
L
A
S
R
D
WALKER R D
OR
C
H
A
R
D
R
D
S
C
O
U
N
T
Y
L
I
N
E
R
D
5T
H
S
T
I
L
-
2
5
AS
H
E
R
D
S
H
E
G
G
S
R
D
C
LARK
RD
ROCKCRE
E K R D
FOX RIVER D R
ELDAMAINRD
S
E
O
L
A
R
D
M
IL
L
B
R
O
O
K
R
D
Source: chicago metropolitan agency for planning, 2015.
County Boundary
Municipal Boarders
Unincorporated
0 21
Miles
I 1:100,000
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Commercial
Urban Mix with Residential Component
Industrial
Institutional
Open Space
Agricultural
Water
Transportation/Utilities/Communication/Other
Under Construction
Vacant
Existing Land Use (CMAP, 2010)
Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, 2014
Figure 2.3 Existing Land Use
15The Case for Shared Services
2 Village of Oswego 2014-2015 budget,
available at: http://www.oswegoil.org/pdf/
FY15FINALBudgetupdated.pdf.
3 Village of Montgomery 2014-2015 budget,
available at: https://ci.montgomery.il.us/
DocumentCenter/View/1370.
4 United City of Yorkville 2014-2015 budget,
available at: http://www.yorkville.il.us/
documents/FY2015Budget.pdf.
Operationally, the communities share the same fiscal
year, which makes it easy to coordinate budgets for
shared services. The communities do, however, vary
in capacity and resources. Table 2.1 above summarizes
several aspects of municipal operations for each of the
communities. The difference in these budgets is due
to variations in municipal operations. For example,
the United City of Yorkville includes library and parks
operations, while the Village of Montgomery includes
special service areas (SSAs). The staff and financial
resources have implications on each community’s
goals for the services they are interested in sharing
and the most effective ways to deliver those services.
Table 2.1 Municipal Operations
Oswego Montgomery Yorkville
Staff size 112 full-time equivalent
employees (FTE)
56 FTE 74 full-time; 86 part-time (FTE
unknown)
2015 Budget $29,204,0872 $24,319,7523 $30,204,8344
Start of Fiscal Year May 1 May 1 May 1
Home Rule Yes No No
Population (2010)30,355 18,438 16,921
16
!
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
lili
li
li
lilili
li
li
li
li
li
lili
li
li
li
li
lili
li li
lili
li
li
li
li
lili
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
DuPage
Will
Wi
l
l
Ke
n
d
a
l
l
Kane
Ken da ll
Aurora
Montgomery
Oswego
Plainfield
Yorkville
W a u b a nseeC
r
e
e
k
Morgan C r e e k
B l a c k b e r ry C r e e k
M o r g a n C r ee k
Fox
River
F o x R iver
W 111TH ST
US-3
4
RANCE RD
US-30
CHICAGO
R
D
HILL
A
V
E
ST
E
W
A
R
T
R
D
IL-7
1
W WOLFS
R
D
OGD
E
N
A
V
E
WO L F S C R O S S I NG R D
P
L
A
I
N
FI
E
L
D
R
D
D
O
U
G
L
A
S
R
D
IL
-
3
1
U
S
-
3
0
US-3
4
GAL
E
N
A
R
D
HA
R
V
E
Y
R
D
127TH ST W 127TH STSIMONS RD
DO
U
G
L
A
S
R
D
OR
C
H
A
R
D
R
D
S
E
O
L
A
R
D
I
L
-
2
5
S
H
E
G
G
S
R
D
RI
D
G
E
R
D
Cowdrey
Cemetery
Doud
Cemetery
Lincoln
Memorial
Park
Oswego Prairie
United
Methodist Church
Pearce Cemetery
Willow
Hill
School
Township
of Oswego
Winrock
Park
Long Beach
Elementary
School
Boulder Hill
Elementary
School
Thompson
Junior High
School
Civic
Center ParkViolet
Patch
Park
Fox Bend
Golf Course
Oswego
High
School
Traughber Junior
High
School
Saw Wee
Kee Park
Lynwood
Baptist
Church
Gospel
Assembly
Church
Keck
Memorial
Cemetery
Oswego
Township
Cemetery
Oswego Post Office
Wormley
Cemetery
East View Elementary
School
Marina
Shopping
Center
Oswego
Station
(historical)
Settlers
Landing Mall
Shopping Center
Townes Crossing
Shopping
Center
South Center
Shopping Center
Yorkville
Prairie Nature
Preserve
Christian
Church of Oswegoland
Church of the Good
ShepherdLandmark
Missionary
Baptist Church
Oswego
Presbyterian
Church
Saint
Annes
Church
Calvary
Baptist
Church
Pathway
Community
Church
Saint Luke's
Lutheran
Church
Neighborhood Church
of the Brethren
Valley
Baptist
Church
Little White
School
Museum
Oswego Public Library
Oswego Village Hall
Augusta
Lake Park
Briarcliff Woods Park
Heritage Park
Jaycee Park
Northampton
Park
Stonegate
Park
Susan
John
Park
Boulder
Hill Census
Designated Place
Village of Montgomery
Village
of Oswego
Oswego Fire Protection
District Station 1
Oswego Fire Protection
District Station 3
Oswego
Fire Protection
District Station 2
Source: chicago metropolitan agency for planning, 2015.
1:50,833
County Boundary
Oswego
Other Municipalities
Unincorporated
Open Space
Water
0 10.5
Miles
I
Community Amenities
li Civil
li Fire Station
li School
li Public Library
li Post Office
li Church
li Cemetery
li Shopping Center
li Other
Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, 2014
Figure 2.4: Oswego Municipal Facilities
17The Case for Shared Services
!
!
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
lili
li
li
lililili
li
lili
li
li
li
li
li
lili
li
li
li
li
li
li
lili
li li
lili
li
li
li
li
lili
li
li
li
li
li
lili
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
Kane
Kendall
Aurora
Montgomery
Oswego
Sugar
Grove
Yorkville
W a u b a n seeC
r
e
e
k
B l a ckberryCreek
Blackb e r r y C r e ek
FoxRiver
Fox R i v e r
M O N T G O M E R Y R D
E
M
I
L
L
S
T
U
S
-
3
0
PRAIRIE ST
U S-3 4
E
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
S
T
US-30
E GALENA BLVD
S L
A
K
E
S
T
HI
LL
A
V
E
IL-71
S B
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
D
O
U
G
L
A
S
R
D
IL
-
3
1
US-3
4
GAL
E
N
A
R
D
N
CANN O N B ALLTRL
JERICH
O
R
D
W O L F S C R O S S I N G R D
P
L
A
I
N
F
I
E
L
D
R
D
S BROADWAYRD
OR
C
H
A
R
D
R
D
S
E
D
G
E
L
A
W
N
D
R
GR
O
V
E
R
D
I
L
-
2
5
5T
H
S
T
Doud
Cemetery
French
Cemetery
Kiehl Park
Lincoln
Memorial
Park
Oak Grove
Cemetery
Oswego Prairie
United
Methodist Church
Pearce Cemetery
Riverside
Cemetery
Saint Paul's
Catholic
Cemetery
Willow
Hill
School
Township
of Oswego
Pine
Knoll
Park
Porter
Park
Rose E Krug
Elementary School
Winrock
Park
Long Beach
Elementary
School
Boulder Hill
Elementary
School
Thompson
Junior High
School
Civic Center
Park
Violet
Patch
Park
Fox Bend
Golf Course
Oswego
High
School
Traughber
Junior High
School
Jericho
Lake
Park
Saint
Patrick's
Catholic Cemetery
Saw Wee
Kee Park
Lynwood
Baptist
Church
Gospel
Assembly
Church
Keck
Memorial
Cemetery
Bristol
Grade
School
Bristol
Post
Office
Oswego
Township
Cemetery
Oswego Post
Office
Wormley
Cemetery
Bristol United
Methodist
Church
East View
Elementary
School
Marina
Shopping
Center
Oswego
Station
(historical)
Saint Patrick Catholic
Church
Settlers
Landing
Mall Shopping Center
Townes
Crossing
Shopping Center
Berman
Park
Krug Park
Nicholson
Elementary
School
South Center
Shopping Center
Westwood Park
Yorkville
Prairie Nature
Preserve
Christian
Church of Oswegoland
Church of the Good
ShepherdLandmark
Missionary Baptist
Church
Oswego
Presbyterian
Church
Saint
Annes
Church
New Hope Southern
Missionary Church
Lebanon
Full Gospel Church
Saint Olaf
Evangelical
Lutheran Church
Kingdom Hall
of Jehovah's
Witnesses
Park Place
Baptist
Church
First Church of
the Nazarene
Calvary
Baptist
Church
Pathway Community Church
Faith
Assembly Church
of Montgomery
Saint Luke's
Lutheran
Church
Neighborhood Church
of the Brethren
Valley
Baptist
Church
Montgomery
Park
Pierce
Park
Little
White School
Museum
Oswego Public Library
Oswego Village Hall
Augusta
Lake Park
Briarcliff Woods Park
Heritage
Park
Jaycee Park
Northampton
Park
Stonegate
Park
Susan
John
Park
Boulder
Hill Census
Designated Place
Village of Montgomery
Village
of Oswego
Schaefer
Greenhouses
Ridge
Ambulance
Service
Montgomery and Countryside Fire
Protection District Station 1
Oswego Fire Protection
District Station 1
Bristol - Kendall Fire
Protection District
Station 3
Montgomery and Countryside Fire
Protection District Station 2
Oswego Fire Protection
District Station 3
Oswego Fire
Protection
District Station 2
Aurora Township
Fire Protection
District Station 2
Bristol - Kendall Fire
Protection
District Station 2
Source: chicago metropolitan agency for planning, 2015.
1:50,879
County Boundary
Montgomery
Other Municipalities
Unincorporated
Open Space
Water
0 10.5
Miles
I
Community Amenities
li Civil
li Fire Station
li School
li Public Library
li Post Office
li Church
li Cemetery
li Shopping Center
li Other
Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, 2014
Figure 2.5: Montgomery Municipal Facilities
18
li
li
li li
li
li
li
li
lili
li
lili
li
lilili
li
li li
li
lili
li
lili
lili
li
li
li
lili
li
li
li
li
lili
li
lili
li
li
lili
li
li
lilili
li li
lili
li
li
lilili
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
li
Kane
Kendall
Joliet
Montgomery
OswegoPlano
Sandwich
Yorkville
Fox Ri v e r
F oxRiver
MorganCreek
Ho
l
lenbackCreek
Rob
R
oy
Creek
R o b Roy Cr ee k
Mid d le A u x S a b le Cree k
BigRockCreek
Bla c k b e r r y C re e k
LittleRockC reek
F o x R i v e r
GALENA RD
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
IL-71
S
B
E
N
ST
E S O U T H ST
IL-1
2
6
US-34
W
HITFIE
L
D
R
D
IL
-
3
1
CANNO N B A L L T R L
US-30
L
I
T
T
L
E
R
O
C
K
R
D
IL-7 1ROGERS RD
WALKER RD
OR
C
H
A
R
D
R
D
I
L
-
2
5
ROC K C RE E K R D
FOX RIVER D R
ELDAMAINR
D
AS
H
E
R
D
M
I
L
L
B
R
O
O
K
R
D
Faxon
School
Pavillion
Cemetery
Tukaway
Farm
Cowdrey
Cemetery
Doud
Cemetery
Elmwood Cemetery
Jericho
Cemetery
Oak Grove
Cemetery
Pearce CemeteryTownship
of Bristol
Long Beach
Elementary
SchoolBoulder Hill
Elementary
School
Thompson
Junior High
School
Civic
Center Park
Violet
Patch
Park
Fox
Bend Golf Course
Oswego High School
Traughber
Junior High
School
Harris County
Forest
Preserve
Saint Patrick's Catholic
Cemetery
New Life Assembly Church
Glen D Palmer
State Game Farm Yorkville
High School
Circle Center Middle
School
Saw Wee
Kee Park
Lyon County
Forest
Preserve
Lynwood
Baptist
Church
Gospel
Assembly Church
Keck Memorial Cemetery
Bristol Grade School
Bristol Post Office
Yorkville Post Office
Kendall
County Courthouse
Oswego
Township Cemetery
Oswego
Post
Office
Wormley
Cemetery
Beecher Community
BuildingBible
Baptist
Church
Bristol United
Methodist Church
Countryside
Center Shopping Center
East View
Elementary
School
Fox Industrial Park
Long Grove Woods
Marina
Shopping
Center
Oswego
Station
(historical)
Saint Patrick
Catholic
Church
Saint
Patricks Parish
Center
Waubonsee
College-Yorkville Campus
Yorkville Baptist Church
Yorkville City Park
Yorkville
Congregational
Church
Yorkville Grade School
Yorkville
Public
Library
Yorkville United
Methodist Church
Yorkville
Prairie Nature
Preserve
Christian
Church of Oswegoland
Church of the Good
ShepherdLandmark Missionary
Baptist Church
Oswego
Presbyterian
Church
Saint
Annes
Church
Pathway Community Church
Saint Luke's Lutheran
Church
Neighborhood Church of
the Brethren
Little
White School Museum
Oswego Public Library
Oswego Village Hall
Augusta
Lake Park
Briarcliff
Woods Park
Heritage Park
Northampton
Park
Stonegate
Park
Susan
John Park
Boulder Hill
Census Designated
Place
City of
Yorkville
Village
of Montgomery
Village of Oswego
Rush-Copley
Healthcare Center
Oswego Fire Protection
District Station 1
Bristol -
Kendall Fire Protection
District Station 1
Bristol - Kendall Fire
Protection District
Station 3
Oswego Fire
Protection
District Station 3
Bristol - Kendall
Fire Protection
District Station 2
1:85,185
County Boundary
Yorkville
Other Municipalities
Unincorporated
Open Space
Water
0 10.5
Miles
I
Community AmenitiesliCivilliFire Station
li School
li Public LibraryliPost OfficeliChurch
li Cemetery
li HospitalliShopping CenterliOther
Source: chicago metropolitan agency for planning, 2015.Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, 2014
Figure 2.6: Yorkville Municipal Facilities
19
Chapter 3
Process for Developing the
Partnering Initiative
Process for Developing the
Partnering Initiative
This chapter discusses the process used to
develop the Partnering Initiative and summarizes
the outcomes from each step. The process
outlined below can be used as a template for
future shared service projects with additional
Oswego, Montgomery, or Yorkville staff or for
other municipalities interested in joining the
initiative. Project-specific outcomes are discussed
in Chapter 4.
21Process for Developing the Partnering Initiative
Process Overview
Figure 3.1 Project Timeline
This Study entailed significant research on service delivery and sharing
that informed the design of the process. This background research resulted
in a process for initiating service sharing in the three communities. The
following guiding principles were synthesized from the research:
1. Be flexible. The challenges of shared services vary from community
to community. Efforts to share services require significant flexibility,
especially in initial stages, to be able to accommodate a range of partner
needs and address unexpected legal, logistical, and financial issues that
arise.
2. Establish ownership at all staff levels. Strong leadership from
municipal leaders was identified from the outset as a necessary ingredient
for a sharing Partnering Initiative’s success. In establishing the Partnering
Initiative, the administrators set the direction for other staff by building
a culture of collaboration. At the same time, the process for developing
the Partnering Initiative allowed staff at other levels the autonomy to
develop shared service opportunities that best fit departmental needs. The
administrators’ deference to staff experts on how to share services allowed
them to brainstorm creative solutions that may not have arisen if they had
been given prescriptive instructions from the top.
3. Build upon incremental gains. Past experiences emphasized the
need for municipalities to proceed methodically by fostering relationships
and trust, and by building upon small accomplishments. This Partnering
Initiative starts with easily implementable activities before moving onto
more complicated ones.
4. Be transparent. Shared services require trust among communities that
may compete for economic development, funding, and other resources. In
order for communities to develop good working relationships with their
neighbors, they must create an environment of openness and transparency.
The Partnering Initiative was developed with guidance from other
municipal leaders and technical advisors, as well as robust engagement
with staff from the three communities. The process used to develop the
Shared Services Study entailed conducting background research, seeking
expert guidance, and hosting a series of municipal staff workshops that
helped define the direction of the Partnering Initiative. Figure 3.1 provides
a timeline for this project in 2014-15.
Guiding Principles
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study22
5 Resources included: Thurmaier, Kurt; Peters,
Dawn; Rapp, Craig (Eds.), A Handbook of
Alternative Service Delivery for Local Government
(International City/Council Management
Association, 2014). Office of the New York
State Comptroller, Division of Local Government
and School Accountability, Shared Services in
Local Government (2009). Citizens’ Efficiency
Commission for Sangamon County, Exceeding
Expecatations: A New Vision for Greater Local
Government Efficiency and Effectiveness in
Sangamon County (2014). Institute for Local
Government.,“The Importance of Written
Agreements,” Available at: http://www.ca-ilg.org/
post/importance-written-agreements.
6 Detailed case study write-ups of shared services
initiatives can be found in Appendix B.
The Study was led by an Advisory Group comprised
of municipal administrators from each of the three
communities:
Christina Burns, Assistant Village Administrator,
Village of Yorkville
Steve Jones, Former Village Administrator,
Village of Oswego
Bart Olson, City Administrator,
United City of Yorkville
Jeff Zoephel, Village Administrator,
Village of Montgomery
This Advisory Group helped to develop the initial
scope of the project, provided feedback on the process,
and participated in working group discussions to
brainstorm opportunities for shared services. This
group continues to provide leadership over the
ongoing Partnering Initiative in Oswego, Montgomery,
and Yorkville.
To better understand the local service context in this
region, CMAP staff conducted background research
on alternative service delivery practices and shared
service initiatives.5 A literature review of scholarly
articles, guidance documents, and case studies of
previous shared services activities provided the
foundation for how this study was carried out.
The literature review was supplemented by in-depth
interviews with municipal managers, department
heads, and non-profit organizations in this region
that have initiated or participated in previous
service sharing efforts. Interviewees included staff
from the Villages of Burr Ridge, Buffalo Grove, Glen
Ellyn, Glenview, Lincolnshire, and Lombard, as well
as the DuPage Mayors and Managers Association,
Metropolitan Mayors Caucus, and Metropolitan
Planning Council. These interviews provided insight
on the nuts and bolts of shared services, as well as
lessons learned from past experiences.6
CMAP also contracted with HR Green, a firm that
specializes in management and strategic planning
for local governments. HR Green provided invaluable
advice on the process, feedback on the Study, and
assistance in carrying out staff workshops.
Advisory Committee Research and Expert Interviews
23Process for Developing the Partnering Initiative
Because shared services require considerable coordination and buy-in
at the staff level, a number of staff across several departments played a
significant role shaping the Partnering Initiative at every step. In keeping
with background research and the Study’s guiding principles, four
working groups were organized around common service-sharing topics,
each comprised of staff from all three municipalities. The working group
structure was intended to build ownership of service-sharing initiatives
among departmental leadership, and to create a collaborative environment
in which staff from all three communities could identify mutual challenges
and opportunities that they could jointly address.
The initial working groups included department directors and deputy
directors, but have been expanded as necessary depending upon the
service sharing ideas that were discussed. Additionally, municipal
administrators were included in the development of each working group,
primarily in an advisory and managerial capacity. The working groups
were composed of the following staff members from Oswego, Montgomery,
and Yorkville:
Administration and Finance
Christina Burns, Assistant Village Administrator, Village of Yorkville
Carrie Hansen, Interim Village Administrator, Village of Oswego
Mark Horton, Finance Director, Village of Oswego
Steve Jones, Former Village Administrator, Village of Oswego
Bart Olson, City Administrator, United City of Yorkville
Justin VanVooren, Director of Finance, Village of Montgomery
Jeff Zoephel, Village Administrator, Village of Montgomery
Community Development
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director, United City of
Yorkville
Jerad Chipman, Senior Planner, Village of Montgomery
Chris Heinen, Planner, United City of Yorkville
Tom Pahnke, Building and Zoning, Village of Oswego
Richard Young, Director of Community Development, Village of
Montgomery
Rod Zenner, Community Development Director, Village of Oswego
Public Safety
Jeff Burgner, Chief of Police, Village of Oswego
Richard Hart, Chief of Police, United City of Yorkville
Larry Hilt, Deputy Chief, United City of Yorkville
Terry Klingel, Deputy Chief, United City of Yorkville
Dan Meyers, Chief of Police, Village of Montgomery
Armando Sanders, Deputy Chief, Village of Montgomery
Public Works
Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works, United City of Yorkville
Jennifer Hughes, Director of Public Works, Village of Oswego
Mike Pubentz, Director of Public Works, Village of Montgomery
Mark Runyon, Assistant Director of Public Works, Village of Oswego
Jerry Weaver, Utility Services Director, Village of Oswego
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville Staff
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study24
Municipal Workshops
7 The worksheets used in these workshops are
compiled in Appendix C.The development of the Partnering Initiative consisted
of a series of workshops and tasks that allowed
municipal staff to identify the goals of service sharing,
discussed potential challenges, and determined shared
services to pursue.7
• Goal-setting and visioning workshop. The four
working groups convened separately for the first
time in late 2014. With facilitation from CMAP and
HR Green, staff identified common goals for shared
services and participated in a visioning exercise to
brainstorm the types of shared service projects that
could help meet those goals. Each working group
then sorted their potential services for sharing
by using two metrics: level and type of benefit,
and resource intensity. This prioritization exercise
allowed each working group to identify a short list
of services to explore further for potential sharing
arrangements. The working groups designated staff
to conduct further research to document how each
municipality currently delivers services, identify
steps needed to share the services, and anticipate
potential challenges to sharing.
• Prioritization workshop. At the second set
of workshops, staff leads presented findings on
potential shared services. If sharing arrangements
seemed feasible in the near-term, the working
groups outlined next steps for moving forward.
Outcomes of these discussions are described in
Chapter 4.
• Roundtable Exchange. In April 2015, all four
working groups met to share updates, questions,
and feedback about their efforts to date, and
to exchange ideas about how to move forward.
Staff from the Village of Glenview led a group
discussion of lessons learned from their shared
service experiences through their Municipal
Partnering Initiative (MPI) and provided advice to
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville staff on how
to navigate challenges. The Roundtable Exchange
was the first time that staff across all departments
and municipalities convened. In addition to being
a useful forum for multijurisdictional and multi-
departmental exchange, the workshop also served as
a relationship-building activity.
25Process for Developing the Partnering Initiative
Chapter 4
Shared Service Initiative Progress
Report and Recommendations
Shared Service Initiative Progress
Report and Recommendations
Through the process described above, each
working group has put significant work into
implementing shared services. These efforts
are ongoing. This chapter details the progress
of the Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative to
date. It describes the outcomes of the goal-
setting and visioning workshops reviewed in the
previous chapter. Each shared service activity is
summarized and followed by recommendations for
next steps to implement the shared service. Most
of the shared services discussed in this chapter
came out of the municipal workshops, but some
additional recommendations are proposed for
consideration.
These recommendations are categorized into
either short-term activities (to be completed in the
next year), mid-term activities (to be completed in
the next 2-4 years), or long-term activities (to be
completed after 5 years).
27Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
Each working group discussed the motivations for sharing services. The
table below shows the range of goals in order of frequency that they were
identified across the working groups. The top three goals, expressed by all
four groups, were cost savings and control, knowledge exchange across the
communities, and more efficient service delivery.
The most common interests across all working groups related to
improving the efficiency of internal operations: saving costs, sharing
knowledge, reducing the administrative burden of service delivery, freeing
up staff time, and limiting liability. The public works and community
development departments both expressed limitations of being understaffed
and were interested in using shared services to improve service delivery
processes for staff.
Several other goals pertain to improving relations with residents by
expanding and improving the quality of services and building public trust.
Because the public works and public safety departments provide services
that are highly visible to the public, such as crime response, neighborhood
patrol, and infrastructure maintenance, these departments were most
interested in the public benefits of shared services.
Three final goals focus on long-term overarching changes to local
governance: creating a collaborative culture, reducing the volume of
local governments, and preparing for future growth of the communities.
By nature of their work, administrators and community development
departments focus on long-term and strategic planning. These were the
only departments to include such aspirations in their lists of goals.
After establishing these goals, each working group set about prioritizing
the shared services that would best meet their stated goals. The following
sections summarize each working group’s ongoing discussion of priorities
for shared services, and offers next steps for how each activity should be
implemented.
Overall Goals for Shared Services
Table 4.6 Goals for Service Sharing
Goals Administration
and Finance
Community
Development
Public
Safety
Public
Works
Save/control costs ••••
Exchange knowledge ••••
Deliver services
more efficiently ••••
Build public trust/
Set consistent public
expectations
•••
Improve quality of
services for residents •••
Save/free up staff
time •••
Create collaborative
culture ••
Reduce
administrative
burden/ Simplify
bidding process
••
Joint purchasing
and/or joint use
of high-priced
equipment
••
Institute formal
agreements to limit
liability
••
Expand services that
the communities are
able to provide
•
Prepare for future
community growth •
Reduce the number
of local governments •
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study28
8 Appendix B provides these case studies.
Administrators are responsible for guiding municipal
growth and managing daily operations. They work
closely with all departments and staff to maintain
municipal budgets and services. This perspective puts
Administrators in the best position to provide long-
term cross-municipal oversight of the Lower Fox River
Partnering Initiative.
Shared service initiatives require significant
commitment and dedication from leaders at the
top. As case studies8 from around the region show,
shared service initiatives often experience setbacks.
The unsuccessful Oswego-Montgomery joint
waste-hauling bid is just one example where a few
operational details can derail an entire sharing activity.
Continued leadership from Administrators and elected
officials can ensure the longevity of the initiative.
Administrators should enable departmental staff
to implement shared service projects by providing
high-level support, such as liaising with municipal
attorneys, budgeting, hiring new staff, strategic
planning, and evaluating the Partnering Initiative’s
success.
Administration and Finance
Prioritized Actions
29Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
The working groups are interested in sharing a wide array of services.
Each of these will take staff time and resources to implement. As part
of their role in overseeing the shared service initiative, Administrators
should organize an annual shared services strategic planning session for
municipal staff to develop a roadmap for sharing services in the coming
year. This meeting will provide opportunities for cross-jurisdictional
coordination, as well as time to reflect on successes and challenges from
the past year. In advance of the planning session, staff should fill out a
short survey identifying the services they are interested in sharing. The in-
person meeting should accomplish four objectives:
• Select the set of shared services to pursue in the next year
• Identify point people to lead each shared service
• Discuss potential challenges and next steps needed for a sharing
agreement
• Compile a shared services action plan that identifies sequence of actions
needed to accomplish all of the shared service activities in the next year
Ideally, the strategic planning session should occur early enough each
fiscal year so that the staff has ample time to design sharing agreements
well before the following year’s budget is passed.
The strategic planning session can provide an opportunity for
Administrators to review the full slate of shared service projects with
staff before individual items are submitted to respective Boards for
approval. This review prevents individual departments from embarking
on overlapping or incompatible shared services and ensures that a
coordinating body is aware of the various shared activities occurring
in the municipalities. With a more global view of municipal operations,
Administrators may also be more attuned to overall political dynamics,
budget constraints, and other considerations that may affect shared
service delivery.
As part of the strategic planning process, the Administrators should
establish a file-sharing platform so that staff from all three communities
can access shared documents.
Next steps: Administrators should set a date for the strategic planning
session in the late summer or early fall of 2015. In advance of this meeting,
Administrators should survey staff to identify services to consider for
the 2015-2016 fiscal year. The interest gauged from this survey should
inform the meeting’s agenda and the relevant staff that should be
involved. Administrators should also create a file-sharing platform to
share information regarding the strategic planning session and subsequent
projects that come out of it.
Organize an annual Shared Services
Strategic Planning Session
Short-term (annual ongoing)
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study30
All of the workshops expressed interest in joint bidding and equipment
sharing. To respond to this request, CMAP prepared a memo reviewing the
alignment of terms, conditions, and protections for shared contracts across
each entity. This memo, included in full in Appendix A, has been submitted
to the administrators, who can work with municipal attorneys to
determine how or whether to address the identified contract discrepancies.
This step was a precursor to initial sharing steps in other places. Table
4.7 summarizes the comparison of contract elements. Administrators can
use the contract alignment memo as a starting point for undertaking any
contract amendments. This effort should result in a standardized contract
template for joint bidding, as well as a standardized use agreement for
equipment sharing.
Next steps: The Finance Directors and Administrators should be
accountable for working with municipal attorneys to standardize contract
language that can be used in any multi-municipal sharing agreements.
A potential Joint Purchasing Agent (discussed below) could be an
appropriate person to coordinate the contract alignment process, but
creating and staffing the position is not a necessary prerequisite to
developing shared contract language. Communities may want to complete
this task before a Joint Purchasing Agent is in place to enable other
departments to pursue joint procurement opportunities sooner.
Once attorneys agree upon standardized contract terms, they will still need
to approve individual joint contracts for specific shared services. Based
on the experience of communities involved in the Municipal Partnering
Initiative (MPI) (see Appendix B), the communities should establish a
protocol wherein approval of a contract from one municipality’s attorney is
sufficient for joint bids to be approved for all municipalities. This reduces
the labor and cost of having three individual attorneys review the same
document each time a new joint bid arises.
For equipment sharing agreements, the use policy should cover legal and
financial liability for repairing or replacing borrowed equipment that is
damaged or destroyed. Because public safety and public works equipment
is often required on short notice, all the working groups were interested
in reducing the administrative red tape to be able to borrow equipment.
Therefore, a general policy should serve as a one-time agreement, rather
than requiring individual policies or use forms every time sharing occurs.
Issues to cover in this agreement include requisition process, maintenance
costs, repairs to damaged equipment, liability, and indemnification, among
others. Departments should, however, specify terms of use for specialized
equipment. The communities agreed that only expensive equipment should
require intergovernmental agreements (IGAs). The threshold costs to
trigger IGAs must be also determined.
Develop contract templates for service agreements
Short-term
31Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
Table 4.7 Summary & Comparison of Contract Elements
Oswego Montgomery Yorkville Aligned?Notes
Preamble •••Yes All use similar language.
Scope of Work
•••
Yes All attach the issued RFP and reference it as an Exhibit within the contract, stating
that the contractor shall furnish services as set forth in the RFP and be compensated
in accordance with the Exhibit.
Compensation •••Yes All refer to compensation as listed in RFP.
Contract Term •••Yes Oswego states the agreement begins on date signed by all parties, Montgomery &
Yorkville refer to RFP- which lists specific dates.
Termination of Contract •••No Oswego & Montgomery reserve right to terminate 14 days after written notice,
Yorkville after 7 days.
Status as Independent Contractor •••Yes All specify that the contractor shall not be considered employee of the municipality.
Bonding Yes None state any requirements for bonding of any type.
Signatures •••Yes All require three signatures (Municipal official, Clerk, Contractor).
Certifications of Compliance with
State and Federal Statutes ••No Level of detail varies for each municipality, ranging from Montgomery’s extensive
listing to Yorkville’s inclusion of zero specified certifications.
Indemnification ••No Yorkville’s provision differs from Oswego and Montgomery.
Additional Services ••No Yorkville does not include language barring modifications w/o consent.
Notification ••No Yorkville does not include contact info for City and Contractor.
Non-Disclosure ••No Oswego & Montgomery include, but differ. Yorkville doesn’t include.
Severability •No Only Oswego addresses severability.
Workman’s Comp Insurance •?•No Required by Oswego and Yorkville, Montgomery unknown.
General Liability Insurance •?•No Required by Oswego and Yorkville (differing amounts), Montgomery unknown.
Commercial Automobile
Liability Insurance •?No Required by Oswego, not required by Yorkville, Montgomery unknown.
Umbrella or Excess Liability Insurance •?No Required by Oswego, Not Required by Yorkville, Montgomery unknown.
• = Element is included in municipality’s submitted contract
? = Unknown
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study32
All municipal departments make a variety of purchases on a regular
basis. From software and daily use office supplies to police firearms and
specialized maintenance equipment, the types of purchased products are
similar across the three communities. Currently, procurement is done
department by department within in each municipality, including for
items as basic as paper, printer ink, and pens. The communities should
hire a Joint Purchasing Agent to streamline and coordinate procurement
activities of Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville. This position can also
function as an advisor regarding general efficiency measures, as well as
other cost-saving procurement approaches beyond joint purchasing.
Joint purchasing came up in all four working groups, and a joint
purchasing agent was suggested in two of the working groups
(administration and public safety). The finance directors have taken on
this activity, with Montgomery’s Director of Finance as the lead.
Next steps: Due to significant demand and wide-reaching benefits for all
departments, the Study recommends moving forward with this activity.
The immediate next steps are for the finance directors to work through
several logistical questions:
• Will the Agent be officially staffed through one of the municipalities?
• Is there sufficient work for the Agent to be a full-time staff person, or is
a contract or part-time staff person more appropriate?
• How will the costs of employee salary and/or benefits be divided?
• How will the Agent’s time be divided?
Once a Joint Purchasing Agent is in place, the department heads for each
municipality should submit a list of order specifications for general office
supplies. The Agent will be responsible for selecting lowest cost supplies
that fit the needs of each of the departments. Based on experiences in
other communities, the Study recommends starting with simple purchases
that do not vary much between communities. Services that can vary
substantially in different communities, such as custodial services and
facility repairs, should be pursued only after communities feel comfortable
with the arrangement.
Hire a Joint Purchasing Agent
Mid-term
33Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
Staff at all three communities routinely undergo professional development
training that keeps them up-to-date on best practices on a variety of
topics. The administrators were interested in shared training sessions as a
non-resource intensive and low-benefit activity that could serve as an easy
starting point for human resources service sharing.
Yorkville served as the lead to share this service and hosted an initial joint
training on reasonable suspicion. The Administrators have been inviting
their partners to upcoming trainings. The communities plan held another
joint training on the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in Oswego.
Next steps: The Administrators found this service straightforward to
share, requiring low staff capacity and no additional cost. Going forward,
the Administrators should establish a list of mutual training needs and
jointly plan trainings in the future rather than inform partners about
independently scheduled trainings. Additional training ideas discussed
at the workshops included harassment and management training. Space
permitting, the hosts and locations of the training should rotate among
the three communities. Yorkville should continue to facilitate updates and
discussions about shared staff trainings, but Oswego and Montgomery
should also contribute to training ideas and events.
Shared trainings should also be seen as opportunities to build better
relationships among all levels of staff across the communities. They can
allow staff not currently involved in shared service projects to meet their
counterparts at other municipalities and open doors of communication for
future cooperation.
The communities expressed interest in expanding capacity for existing
IT services. Both Montgomery and Yorkville have contracted part-time IT
staff. Trouble-shooting and general assistance has been difficult with part-
time arrangements: Montgomery’s consultant is only on-site once a week
and Yorkville’s is only on-site one a month. Although Oswego has one
full-time in-house IT consultant who handles various IT, GIS, and other
software issues, the Village is interested in increasing its IT capacities.
The working group discussed sharing IT infrastructure, such as servers or
equipment, as well as IT staffing.
Oswego’s Village Treasurer and Finance Director conducted further
research to determine the viability of sharing IT services, but identified
many potential challenges. Despite significant potential benefits for
Montgomery and Yorkville, the working group felt that it would be
difficult to ensure equal staffing among the three communities. They also
anticipated difficulty for one staff person to work in three very different
IT systems. Due to these complexities, the working group decided not to
pursue any sharing arrangements at this time.
Next steps: The working group should pursue more straightforward
sharing agreements in the early stages of the initiative, but continue to
consider shared IT services and staffing in the future. MPI communities,
for instance, have long been interested in sharing IT services, but found
it difficult to accomplish in the first few years of the initiative. It was
not until 2013 that 13 MPI communities commissioned a joint IT Shared
Services Assessment, which provided them with information to proceed
with an RFP for a shared vendor. If the working group decides to pursue
shared IT services in the future, it should consider first completing a
similar assessment of IT services across the communities before issuing
an RFP. The Study notes, however, that IT sharing has become a very
common outsourced service for municipalities. When the communities are
ready to pursue this service, they should engage an IT provider to provide
a comprehensive assessment of each of their IT needs.
Share professional development training
Ongoing
Share IT services
Long-term
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study34
Community development departments constantly negotiate tensions
between tasks that require immediate attention, such as code enforcement
and permitting, and long-term planning. Yorkville and Montgomery also
have very small community development staffs with just a few full-time
staff each. The Community Development Working Group focused on
shared activities that would maximize limited resources for short-term to
free up staff time for longer-term initiatives.
The recommendations in this section focus on how the working group
can codify informal practices in place and institute sharing arrangements
that can free up limited staff time. With expanded capacity, existing staff
will be able to focus more on plan review, long-range planning, and other
elements of municipal growth and development.
Community Development
Prioritized Actions Execute building safety mutual aid agreement
Short-term
The communities have a number of formal and informal building services
sharing practices in place. Yorkville, for instance, has a reciprocal
agreement with Kendall County and another with Oswego to share
building inspectors. The communities also informally share inspectors in
times of need.
After discussing each community’s building service needs, the working
group agreed to pursue a Building Safety Mutual Aid Agreement. This
agreement permits reciprocal use of resources in emergency or unexpected
situations that leave municipalities short-staffed. Although this sharing
occurs on an informal and ad hoc basis already, the participants felt that
codifying the practice into a joint agreement would clarify legal liability.
Next steps: Using the South Suburban Building Officials Association
Building Safety Mutual Aid Agreement as a template, the working group
should work with the building and zoning inspectors to modify the
template for Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville. The staff should also
seek approval of the municipal attorneys before finalizing the agreement,
which will then need to be brought to the boards for approval.
35Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
Executing the mutual aid agreement is a simple and immediate next
step. Once that is complete, the working group should explore additional
shared building services to build off of this accomplishment. As a follow-
up activity, the municipalities should align schedules for updating their
building codes. Aligned building codes simplifies the permitting and
plan review process for developers and make an area more attractive for
developers.
The building codes in all of the communities generally follow the 2009
International Code Council standards. Each of the codes has been modified
with local amendments, but the foundational requirements are the same.
Table 4.8 provides a comparison of building codes by municipality. Only
two codes are divergent across the municipalities: Montgomery uses a
more recent 2012 International Energy Conservation Code and a more
outdated National Electric Code.
Next steps: Because this item was not discussed at length during the
workshops, further consideration is needed. The municipalities do not
have set schedules for updating the codes, but should come to consensus
on a regular update schedule. If possible, the municipalities should also
consider aligning local amendments to those codes to further simply the
regulations for developers.
Align building code update schedules
Short-term
Table 4.8 Building Code Comparison by Municipality
Building Codes Oswego Montgomery Yorkville
International Building Code 2009 2009 2009
International Energy Conservation Code 2009 2012 2009
International Mechanical Code 2009 2009 2009
International Property Maintenance Code 2009 2009 2009
International Residential Code 2009 2009 2009
National Electrical Code 2008 2005 2008
Plumbing Code Illinois or 2009 International Plumbing
Code (whichever is more stringent)
Illinois or 2009 International Plumbing Code
(whichever is more stringent)
Illinois or 2009 International Plumbing
Code (whichever is more stringent)
Accessibility Code IL 1997 IL 1997 IL 1997
Schedule for Updating Codes n/a About every 3 years n/a
Link to Municipal Codes Oswego Code Montgomery Code Yorkville Code
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study36
Property maintenance and code enforcement require significant staff time
and resources. Site inspections and managing paperwork can be costly
and time-intensive activities for building and zoning staff. The three
communities have a few similar development patterns that make shared
code enforcement appealing. First, the rise of construction activity in the
area is anticipated to increase the workload for community development
staff. At the same time, the communities all have sizeable number of
vacant lands, which account for 6-11% of land uses in the communities. In
fact, vacant lands account for more land use than commercial properties
in all three municipalities. Whether properties are vacant or about to
be developed, they must be regulated through similar code enforcement
strategies.
The municipalities felt that it was important to maintain control over their
own inspectors due to potential differences in enforcement philosophies
and were not interested in sharing inspection services. In order to
increase the efficiencies without sharing inspectors, staff could share the
administrative tasks associated with code enforcement. Shared tasks can
include preparing documents to record liens, conducting title searches, or
assisting with administrative adjudication or filing of judgment liens.
This arrangement allows each municipality to manage its own enforcement
process, but significantly reduces administrative burdens on building
and zoning staff. As a result, inspectors could spend more time on their
primary duties of inspection. The efficiencies gained by this centralized
process may also be helpful to handle fluctuations of code violations.
Shared administration of code enforcement activities also leads to
increased revenues and general improvements to homes across the area.
A similar effort is currently underway in south suburban Cook County,
where four communities are piloting an Administrative Hub that
streamlines code enforcement for residential properties. More details on
their initiative are provided in Appendix B.
Next step: The working group has not yet discussed this activity, but it
has significant potential to broaden collaboration to backroom functions
that open up more opportunities for cost-savings and freed staff resources.
If building and zoning staff decide to share administrative tasks of code
enforcement, they should develop a step-by-step process that clarifies
roles and operations, following the template of the south suburban effort.
Metropolitan Mayors Caucus (MMC) is interested in expanding the
Administrative Hub outside of south suburban Cook County, as geographic
proximity is not necessary for this shared service. Staff should contact
MMC to participate in the Administrative Hub rather than start their own
if they are interested in pursuing this option further.
Streamline administration of code enforcement
Mid-term
37Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
The Community Development working group was interested in shared
grant-writing support as a way to improve long-term capacity. Oswego has
a half-time employee devoted to grant writing, whereas Montgomery and
Yorkville rely upon individual departments to pursue grant opportunities
pertaining to their own work.
The communities were initially interested in exploring the idea of hiring
a shared grant writer. After further consideration, they determined that
this might not reduce the burden of grant writing, which relies heavily on
staff with on-the-ground expertise. Because grant opportunities can be
sporadic and sometimes require staff to meet urgent deadlines with little
turnaround time, they were also unsure whether a shared grant writer
would have enough consistent work or expertise to complete specific
grants.
Given these concerns, the working group opted to look into subscription
services that would keep the communities up-to-date on new grant
opportunities and deadlines. The working group could consider options
like Grant Finder or Granthelp.com, which provide federal, state, corporate,
and foundation grants opportunity listings to municipalities. The working
group expressed uncertainty about whether this service would provide
new and useful information and have not moved forward with any
decisions.
Next steps: Communities should consider an immediate step of
providing grant writing professional development training to better
equip staff to pursue and write grants when opportunities arise. These
trainings can be open to all levels of staff and should be done under the
purview of joint professional development training as described under the
Administration and Finance section. The task of identifying a grant service
provider should be considered low-priority. Any of the communities should
bring promising alternatives to the group for consideration. The working
group should reach out to other communities for service referrals or
reviews when considering options.
Explore grant notification services
Long-term
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study38
The Community development departments’ tight budgets and small staff
limit their ability to do robust geospatial mapping, analysis, and data
management. In Oswego, the in-house IT consultant is also responsible for
GIS data management. Montgomery and Yorkville both have consultant
engineers that do GIS work at an hourly rate, which can be prohibitively
expensive for in-depth tasks. This arrangement incentivizes Montgomery
and Yorkville to only use GIS if necessary, limiting their geospatial
analytical abilities.
The working group looked at other GIS consortiums, such as the South
Suburban Atlas GIS Consortium, as models for GIS sharing. The Yorkville
Community Development Director organized presentations from two GIS
contractors, MPG and Deuchler. These contractors provide resources for
application development, cartographic mapping, data development and
maintenance, systems integration, and web mapping.
Next steps: The biggest cost savings are expected from reductions in the
cost of ArcGIS software, in addition to reductions in the cost of accessing
GIS data. The communities should tabulate total costs of their current
ArcGIS services to be able to assess relative benefits from each of the
contractor pricing options.
The communities should also confirm interest in GIS sharing, as the
interest from all three communities was unclear from prior discussions.
Yorkville was most in-need of GIS services. While Montgomery also has
GIS needs, it also relies upon Kendall County for much of its GIS data
and may not benefit as much. While Oswego has a staff person partially
dedicated to GIS, it was interested in strengthening GIS capacities in the
case of staff shortages or emergencies. If any of the contractors is deemed
suitable for a joint contract, the communities should move forward with
drafting the contract.
Explore shared GIS Services
Long-term
39Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
Because crime and violence does not stop at municipal boundaries,
maintaining public safety is an inherently collaborative task. The Public
Safety Departments in Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville have a lot
of existing partnerships that make them very receptive shared services.
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville participate in and financially
contribute to Kendall County’s multijurisdictional Special Response Team.
Montgomery and Oswego have conducted some joint community policing
events and seatbelt safety trainings. All three communities are members
of the Illinois Law Enforcement Alarm System (ILEAS), a statewide
mutual aid agreement that authorizes inter-jurisdictional public safety
cooperation for terrorism and emergency response. Detectives from all
three communities participate in the Lower Fox Valley Investigators
Association. Membership in these organizations has afforded officers
many opportunities to work closely with their counterparts in neighboring
municipalities.
The Public Safety Working Group discussed a number of ways to share
resources more efficiently through joint purchasing and equipment
sharing, but was most interested in a larger initiative to form a new joint
Gang Unit Task Force.
Public Safety Prioritized
Each department has specialized equipment such as speed trailers and
crime scene lighting equipment that are costly and infrequently used.
The public safety departments already informally share some equipment,
but this practice has never been formalized. Yorkville has taken the lead
in requesting and compiling a full list of specialized equipment that the
departments would be willing to share.
Next steps: The list of shareable equipment should be saved through a
file sharing platform for all of the communities easily access. Once that
is in place, the next step is to develop specific use policies for equipment
lending. Yorkville should continue to coordinate this effort in line with
any use agreement templates developed through the Administration
and Finance Working Group. While the Study recommends that the
Administrators or Joint Purchasing Agent coordinate general shared use
agreements, public safety officers should stipulate any details specific to
any police equipment. For instance, if any training is needed to operate
specialized equipment, the communities should make necessary provisions
for cross-training. As with other equipment sharing, IGAs should only be
invoked for expensive equipment.
Establish an equipment sharing process
Short-term
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study40
ILEAS covers mutual aid during emergency or terrorist situations, but it is
not an all-purpose mutual aid agreement. A broader mutual aid agreement
would be helpful to reduce current difficulties of routine scheduling. It
would also augment staffing during unanticipated circumstances, such as
car crashes, that require more staff assistance and leave other areas of the
community unpatrolled. Special events, such as 4th of July celebrations,
also require additional public safety support and can leave a municipality
short-staffed. The communities note that they already share public safety
staff on an ad hoc basis, but signing a mutual aid agreement would clarify
liabilities and procedures for staff sharing.
Next step: The public safety mutual aid agreement is recommended as a
short-term sharing activity due to its ease of implementation. The working
group should assign a staff lead for this task. The main issues to resolve
include defining protocol for when staff can be shared, how liability will be
handled, and how to conform to existing labor contracts. The point person
should be in charge of drafting language based on existing templates and
circulate the draft agreement to all of the municipalities for approval.
Execute a public safety mutual aid agreement
Short-term
The Public Safety departments have similar supply needs and were
interested in joint procurement. Ammunition, road flairs, evidence
supplies, paper, toner, and office supplies were determined to be easiest
to jointly purchase. They were also interested in potential joint leasing of
copy machines. The working group also discussed IT services, noting that
IT services were a growing proportion of their departments’ budgets.
Next steps: The Public Safety Working Group should coordinate joint
purchasing of general office supplies with other departments. This activity
can be coordinated through the Joint Purchasing Agent, if one is in place.
With more participating departments, the municipalities can achieve even
greater economies of scale. Oswego should continue lead this effort by
collecting a full list of product order specifications for each the Public
Safety Departments of each community.
Due to reasons provided in the Administration Working Group section, it
is not recommended that the working group pursue shared IT services at
this time. Because IT services are critical for public safety operations, the
group was already hesitant to take risks in sharing the service. If shared
IT services are considered in the future, the Public Safety Departments
should coordinate with the Administrators to participate in the IT service
assessment if sharing IT services.
Pursue joint purchasing with other departments
Mid-term
41Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
All police officers are required to receiving many types of training. Due to
budget cuts, training budgets in Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville have
decreased by as much as 30-40%. Training sessions can be conducted
jointly to reduce costs, as well as provide a shared training experience
that can help officers work together in the field. In some cases, the
municipalities may be able to pay for training for just one person, who
can then serve as a trainer for the rest of the public safety staff in all
three municipalities. The communities may also work through other
regional resources for training, including the International Association of
Chiefs of Police (IACP), Lexipol, The Police Law Institute, Commission
on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA), Police One,
National Institute of Justice, Public Agency Training Council, Northeastern
Illinois Public Safety Training Academy (NIPSTA), and Illinois Law
Enforcement Training & Standards Board (ILETSB).
As a result of this discussion, the working group has already planned some
joint training sessions. The Oswego Police Department and Fire Protection
District jointly completed involuntary committal training in the spring of
2015. The police departments of Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville are
jointly planning firearms training in September 2015.
Next steps: The communities should continue to look for new
opportunities for joint training.
Mitigating gang violence is a priority for the communities and should
be addressed collectively. In response, the Public Safety Working Group
established a multijurisdictional Gang Unit Task Force to coordinate
proactive responses to gang violence and assist other agencies with gang
investigations.
While most working groups were encouraged to pursue straightforward
services to share, the staff expressed strong desire and commitment
to creating the gang unit task force and predicted a high likelihood of
success.
In May 2015, the group formally updated the Kendall County Sheriff
Cooperative Police Assistance Team (CPAT) bylaws to launch the gang
unit task force. The unit currently resides as an arm of the Illinois State
Police Task Force and includes three full-time officers from Oswego,
Yorkville, and the Kendall County Sheriff’s Office that focus explicitly on
gang-related issues. Although supportive of the idea, Montgomery opted
out of the unit due to staffing constraints. The members of the Gang
Unit Task Force are indemnified by the Illinois State Police and share a
common uniform.
Next steps: The Public Safety Working Group should evaluate the
progress of the Gang Unit Task Force after its first year. The participating
jurisdictions should assess the unit’s productivity level and financial
sustainability, as well as outcomes of gang activity and violent crime.
The evaluation process should be led by CPAT, which includes the
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville Police Chiefs. Results of this one-
year evaluation should be included the overall annual shared service
evaluation discussed in Chapter 6. If the Gang Unit Task Force is found to
be effective, the group should also consider expansion of the task force to
neighboring communities that face similar problems, such as the Village of
Plano. Montgomery should consider committing staff at a later date if it is
able to do so.
Establish a Gang Unit Task Force
Ongoing
Share public safety training
Ongoing
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study42
The municipalities keep independent crime records, but lack the resources
to analyze this data internally, not to mention across jurisdictions. The
communities are interested in jointly hiring a crime analyst. This new
position would be in charge of collecting crime information from all three
municipalities into a single database and analyzing the data to better
understand crime patterns and recommend preventative measures.
Next steps: This activity was initially discussed as an independent
shared service project, but should be integrated into the functions of the
gang unit task force. There are no immediate next steps.
Hire a shared crime analyst
Mid-term
43Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
Public works departments provide many critical services to maintain the
condition of public infrastructure. Public services are often a resident’s
primary form of engagement with the municipality. Routine services, such
as garbage hauling, road resurfacing, snow removal, and landscaping are
very visible to the public and can inspire public outcry when performed
poorly. In addition to all types of routine services, public works officials
are responsible for immediate cleanup after unexpected storms, floods, and
other weather events.
Being on the front lines of public-facing work can put strains on public
works departments to maintain a consistent and high level of service
regardless of budget sizes. Many communities have had to reduce the level
of public works services due to budget cuts. The public works working
group emphasized shared services as a way to increase both the quality
and types of services provided in the municipalities.
Despite the immediacy of several public works activities, many public
works services require significant advanced planning and budgeting. For
example, salt procurement for any given winter occurs as much as two
years in advance. One of the biggest challenges for this working group is
the ability to prepare shared service agreements with enough advanced
notice. The working group members voiced concern that if a joint effort
was not successful, the time period for securing new vendors would be
so tight that communities would be without essential services that year.
The proposed process to conduct annual strategic planning sessions can
alleviate some of these concerns and provide staff with ample time to
develop sound sharing agreements.
Public Works
The shape of municipal boundaries highly influences the delivery of public
works services. Currently, the municipalities only provide mowing, street
sweeping, snow removal, pipe maintenance, garbage hauling, and other
services for areas within their borders. Yet, because roadways, pipes,
rights of way, and other types of infrastructure do not end at municipal
borders, service delivery can be rather inefficient. The working group was
particularly interested delivering these services more efficiently. Given the
locations of municipal boundaries, residents in the same neighborhood—or
even on the same street—may reside in different jurisdictions and receive
different levels of service. The working group was interested in using
shared services as a way to set consistent community expectations about
service delivery across municipal borders.
Most instances of shared services from case studies and prior local efforts
have been public works activities. These prior experiences provide the
communities with several examples of bid structures and challenges to
draw from for all of the services discussed below.
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study44
Like public safety departments, public works departments have many
types of expensive specialized equipment. Sharing this equipment can save
costs. Because a lot of public works tasks are seasonal, equipment sharing
may not make sense for equipment that is frequently used or equipment
that all municipalities need at the same time.
Next steps: The public works staff from each municipality should
develop a list of equipment that they are willing to lend to neighboring
communities. Meanwhile, the Administrators should develop a template
use agreement for equipment sharing that all departments can customize,
as described above. Public works staff should add any special terms of
use to the template agreements for specialized equipment. As with other
equipment sharing, IGAs should only be invoked for expensive equipment.
Establish an equipment sharing process
Short-term
Several corridors traverse more than one municipality, but the
communities are only in charge of maintaining the segments that lie
within their municipal boundaries. The working group was interested in
joint mowing along continuous corridors as a more efficient alternative.
The working group was open to either sharing entire mowing contracts or
exploring separate mowing contracts for shared corridors.
The communities decided to start with a joint mowing bid along Route
30, a shared border between Oswego and Montgomery. Oswego planned
to add Montgomery to its existing mowing contract. The working
group hoped that sharing services on specific corridors would help
create standardized community expectations for service in contiguous
neighborhoods. Yorkville opted out of this project because mowing is done
by their Parks Department.
In order to formalize the sharing agreement, Montgomery reviewed
Oswego’s draft Request for Bids for Mowing and Landscape Maintenance
of Village Properties with the intent on joining the contract for Route
30 or potentially the entire Village. Ultimately, however, Montgomery
decided to pursue a separate contract. Although the service was relatively
straightforward, the communities had a tight one-month turnaround time
for reviewing and discussing the shared application.
Next steps: Oswego and Montgomery should attempt a joint mowing
contract for the following fiscal year with more time to develop
specifications that work with both communities. This would give
Montgomery sufficient time to decide whether to renew their existing
contract with Brickman for another year, and may provide Yorkville
with some flexibility to determine whether they may have additional
mowing needs that cannot be covered with existing capacity. The working
group can also consider contracting with Yorkville’s Parks Department
to do limited shared mowing on roads that cut across the other two
communities, such as Route 34 or smaller local roads.
Undertake a joint mowing contract
Short-term
45Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
The group discussed several services in lesser detail, but was not
immediately able to pursue them due to uncertainties in cost-effectiveness,
budget, and operational alignment. The working group should first review
MPI’s shared service projects for additional ideas and bid templates. The
group should then gauge interest those services through the strategic
planning survey for the next fiscal year. Prior discussions about several
common public works services are summarized below.
• Crack sealing: Crack sealing requires large specialized equipment
that is costly to mobilize. The ability to consolidate movement of crack
sealing supplies and equipment to the Lower Fox River area could
reduce costs for each individual municipality.
• Salt procurement: Currently, the municipalities purchase salt through
the State of Illinois procurement process, but are interested in exploring
shared contracts. The State’s request to bid is released in March or April
for the following winter. Any potential shared salt contract should go
out to bid with enough time to rely upon the State deadline as a back-up
option.
• Tree maintenance: The working group identified tree maintenance
(tree trimming, stump grinding, tree removal, and replacement tree
purchasing) as having high sharing potential. Because these services can
entail a great deal of variation across communities, the working group
should clarify specific expectations early and allow sufficient time for
developing shared bid specifications.
• Street sweeping: Oswego and Yorkville both have their own sweeper
trucks and conduct this service in-house. Montgomery uses a street
sweeping contract. In the past, Montgomery has used private vendors,
but should consider contracting the service with Oswego or Yorkville—
provided that either municipality can handle the additional work.
Montgomery may choose to contract with Oswego or Yorkville for the
entire Village, or focus on specific shared corridors that may not take
significantly more time for Oswego or Yorkville to cover when they are
doing their own street sweeping. One consideration for a joint street
sweeping contract is the scheduling because it can take several weeks to
sweep one municipality. Oswego takes three to four weeks to complete
and it is done once a year in the spring. Yorkville takes two to three
weeks to sweep and it is done three times in the spring, summer, and
early winter. Montgomery takes about two weeks to sweep and it is done
two times a year.
• Pavement marking: The communities identified several deterrents
to jointly bidding on pavement marking contracts. First, Montgomery
typically joins the Kane County striping bid. Even if Montgomery were
to pursue a separate joint contract with Oswego and Yorkville, the
combination of all three municipalities may not be large enough to get a
reduction in price of pavement marking. One option may be to discuss
with the Kane/Kendall Council of Mayors to see whether Kane and
Kendall municipalities may be able to pursue a two-county joint bid.
Other services considered
Short- to mid-term
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study46
47Shared Service Initiative Progress Report and Recommendations
Chapter 5
Joint Planning Opportunities
Joint Planning Opportunities
This study—and most shared service initiatives
in this region—primarily addresses sharing
opportunities for day-to-day municipal activities.
The collaborative relationships that develop
from sharing equipment, staff, or public works
maintenance can also be used for broader planning
efforts. The communities may be interested in
aligning local plans, developing joint plans, or
exploring joint capital investments. The inclusion
of both shared service projects and joint planning
efforts in the Partnering Initiative would place
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville as innovative
leaders in regional cooperation. The ideas
presented in this chapter were discussed at a
brainstorming session at the April 2015 roundtable
and are included here for future consideration. The
communities may consider applying to CMAP’s
Local Technical Assistance program to carry out
future multijurisdictional planning efforts.
49Joint Planning Opportunities
Many new technologies, such as smart meters, street and traffic LED
lighting, and electric vehicles, offer long-term benefits, but require
significant capital investments to deploy. The Lower Fox River Partnering
Initiative can be a forum to discuss joint investments in more efficient or
more sustainable technologies.
The communities are currently considering the construction of a joint
compressed natural gas (CNG) fueling station as one such example.
The fueling station would be centrally located and accessible to vehicles
from all three municipal fleets. CNG has become more widely adopted by
local governments as it is considered to be a cleaner, safer, and currently
cheaper alternative to petroleum and diesel. The conversion can be costly,
but joint investment in a shared CNG fueling station can reduce the
upfront capital costs and help each community transition to CNG fleets.
The communities should continue to explore other investments in smarter
and more efficient public infrastructure.
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville rely upon groundwater for their
drinking water and together make up the largest sub-region of deep
aquifer drawdown. Regional development pressures in these and other
groundwater communities have resulted in larger withdrawals from the
groundwater supply—and a larger portion of withdrawals from deep
aquifers. The three communities have committed to a joint Alternative
Water Source Study to explore the potential for a Fox River water
treatment facility. This study is currently part of each community’s budget
for the 2015-2016 fiscal year. Based upon the results of the Alternative
Water Source Study, the communities may decide to share the cost of
constructing the Fox River water treatment facility. The joint construction
of the potential facility should be coordinated through the Partnering
Initiative.
Invest in New Technologies
Conduct Joint Water Supply and
Wastewater Treatment Planning
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study50
Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, 2014
Figure 5.1: Watersheds
!
!
!
I2
I2
Des
Plaines
Subbasin
Upper
Illinois
Subbasin
Lower Fox
Subbasin
Aurora
Route 59
Middle Du
Page River
Watershed
Morgan
Creek
Watershed
Hollenback
Creek-Fox River
Watershed
East Aux
Sable Creek
Watershed
East Run-Blackberry
Creek Watershed
Rob Roy
Creek
Watershed
Squaw Grove-Little
Rock Creek
Watershed
Mastodon
Lake-Fox River
Watershed
Waubonsie
Creek
Watershed
Town of
Oswego-Fox
River Watershed
Town of
Sandwich-Little Rock
Creek Watershed
Town of
Geneva-Fox
River Watershed
West Branch
Big Rock Creek
Watershed
East Branch
Big Rock Creek
Watershed
Welch Creek
Watershed
Lake
Run-Blackberry
Creek Watershed
Town of
Aurora
Watershed
Lower West
Branch Du Page
River Watershed
Clear Creek-Fox
River Watershed
Middle Aux
Sable Creek
Watershed
Big Rock
Creek
Watershed
West Aux
Sable Creek
Watershed
Spring Brook-Du
Page River
Watershed
Yorkville
Montgomery
Oswego
Ka
n
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
Du
P
a
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
Kane County
Kendall County
DuPage County
Will County
Wi
l
l
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ke
n
d
a
l
l
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ke
n
d
a
ll
C
o
u
n
t
y
La
S
a
l
l
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
!
!!
Kankakee
Subbasin
Iroquois
Subbasin
Chicago
Subbasin
Des Plaines
Subbasin
Upper
Illinois
Subbasin
Upper Fox
Subbasin
Lower Fox
Subbasin
Lower
Illinois-Senachwine
Lake Subbasin
Vermilion
Subbasin
Mackinaw
Subbasin
Lower
Rock
Subbasin
Kishwaukee
Subbasin
Green
Subbasin
0 52.5
Miles
I
Lake
Michigan
Source: chicago metropolitan agency for planning, 2014.
Study Area
County Boundary
I2 Metra Station
Metra Rail Line
Subbasin
Water
Floodway
Floodplain
Watershed
1:125,000
51
Jointly Implement Bicycle and
Pedestrian Trail Network
The Lower Fox River is known for its recreational amenities that attract
visitors from around the region each year. The communities participate in
an annual Kayaks AMOY event that allows participants to celebrate the
connections among Aurora, Montgomery, Oswego, and Yorkville along the
Fox River. The event is widely considered successful at bringing attention
this shared resource as a driver of tourism and economic development.
The communities should build upon this effort to expand the greenways
and trails network in the Lower Fox River. The area has a number of
overlapping bicycle and pedestrian plans, all of which propose numerous
trails and routes: the Montgomery Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2013),
Oswego Park District Trail Guide (2004), Kane/Kendall County Council of
Mayors Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2012), and CMAP Regional Greenways
and Trails Plan (2009).
The hierarchy of these plans can be confusing for implementation for local
jurisdictions. To clarify implementation of these plans, the communities
should consider joint applications for constructing bicycle facilities.
With sufficient prioritization, the communities can apply for funding to
construct these trails through the Transportation Alternatives Program
(TAP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding, or Surface
Transportation Program (STP).
The communities should prioritize specific trail segments for
implementation, focusing on shared connections identified in existing
plans. Corridors of interest may include the extension of the regional Fox
River Trail through Oswego and Yorkville and the connections of Galena
Road, Blackberry Creek, and Mill Road through Yorkville and Montgomery
to the Oswego Park-n-Ride parking lot.
Joint prioritization and implementation of regionally significant greenways
and trails will better connect the Lower Fox River to other areas within
the region. Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville build off of this framework
to phase local bicycle and pedestrian networks so that their downtowns
and residential neighborhoods are better connected to regional trails. The
communities should be aware that all three of these programs require of
Phase I engineering to be locally funded and completed.
52
Aurora
Aurora
Big Rock
Joliet
Millbrook
Millington
Montgomery
Naperville
Newark
Oswego
Plainfield
Plano
Plattville
Sandwich
Sugar
Grove
Yorkville
De
K
a
l
b
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ka
n
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
DeKalb
County
Kendall
County
Ka
n
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
Du
P
a
g
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
Kane County
Kendall County
DuPage County
Will County
Wi
l
l
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ke
n
d
a
l
l
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ke
n
d
a
l
l
C
o
u
n
t
y
La
S
a
l
l
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
E N E W Y ORK ST
IL-126
M ON TG OM E RY R D
PLAINFIELD
R
D
LIONS RD
W GALENA BLVD
GALENARD
W 127TH ST
S
D
R
A
U
D
E
N
R
D
PRAIRIE ST
US-3
4
N
EOLA
RD
S
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
W CATON FARM RD
W W O L F S R D
RANCE RD
O G D E N A V E
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
S L A K E S T
SB R OAD W A Y
W 111TH STIL-
7
1
N
L
A
T
H
A
M
S
T
US-30
EGALENA BLVD
E
3
0
T
H
R
D
H
ILL
A
V
E
ST
E
W
A
R
T
R
D
E S O U TH ST
W
HITFIE
L
D
R
D
WOLFS CROSSING
R
D
LI
N
E
R
D
JERICHO RD
E C H UR C H S T
IL
-
3
1
US-30
CANNON B A L L T R L
US-34
AUCUTT RD
HA
R
V
E
Y
R
D
RI
D
G
E
R
D
LI
T
T
L
E
R
O
C
K
R
D
IL-56
IL-7 1
ROGERS RD
SIMONS RD
RH
O
D
E
S
A
V
E
CANTON FARM RD
DO
U
G
L
A
S
R
D
CATON FARM RD
WALKER RD
DU
G
A
N
R
D
OR
C
H
A
R
D
R
D
S
C
O
U
N
T
Y
L
I
N
E
R
D
S
E
D
G
E
L
A
W
N
D
R
S
EOLA
RD
D
RA
U
D
E
N
R
D
I
L
-
2
5
GRAN A RT R D
AS
H
E
R
D
JERICHO
R
D
S
H
E
G
G
S
R
D
5T
H
S
T
CLARK
RD
ROCK
CR EEK R D
FOXRIVER D R
EL
D
A
M
A
I
N
R
D
E
S
A
N
D
W
I
C
H
R
D
Source: chicago metropolitan agency for planning, 2015.
County Boundary
Montgomery
Oswego
Yorkville
Other Municipalities
Forest Preserve
Water
Amtrak Line
Æb Amtrak Station
I2 Metra Station
Metra Rail Line
")Park & Ride
0 2.51.25
Miles
I1:123,883
Highway
Major Road
Local Road
Montgomery Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2013)
Existing
Planned
Oswego Park District Trail Guide (2004)
Existing
Planned
Kane/Kendall County Council of Mayors Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2012)
Existing
Future
Planned
CMAP Regional Greenways and Trails Plan (2009)
Existing
Planned & Programmed
Future
Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, 2014
Figure 5.2: Regional and Local Bikeways
53
9 Municipalities with populations greater
than 25,000 are granted home rule status.
Municipalities with populations less than 25,000
(such as Montgomery and Yorkville) can achieve
home rule status by referendum approval in their
respective community.
Oswego is a home rule9 community while Montgomery
and Yorkville are both non-home rule communities. In
addition to other authorities, home rule communities
often have easier access to lower cost financing
options (i.e. general obligation bonds vs revenue
bonds) that may help drive down borrowing costs
for major capital projects. If the communities are
interested in pursuing future joint capital projects,
the use of Oswego’s home rule financing authorities
to lower project financing costs could be an attractive
option. If utilized, such an arrangement would require
binding intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) among
the communities setting forth repayment assurances
and commitments and other specific terms and
conditions. However, under this arrangement, debt
finance savings for major capital projects such as a
joint water treatment facility on the Fox River could
be significant.
Explore Leveraging Home Rule
Authority for Joint Capital Projects
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study54
Section Title Here 55
Chapter 6
Sustaining the Initiative
Sustaining the Initiative
Shared service initiatives take significant time,
energy, and effort to establish—not to mention
maintain. This chapter provides a number
of lessons learned from the challenges and
successes of shared service examples in this
region, and recommends actions that can help
sustain the Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative
in the long run. This Study suggests ways to
create opportunities for sharing knowledge
and experiences across municipal staff and
departments, evaluate the benefits of sharing,
and build broad-based support from staff, elected
officials, and constituents.
57Sustaining the Initiative
Shared service delivery holds many promises for municipal budgets,
operations, and cooperation. In order to assess whether shared service
efforts are effective, communities need to evaluate their efforts. Municipal
staff should evaluate both the outcomes and the process of the Partnering
Initiative.
Evaluating the Outcomes
Because shared services require a significant amount of work to get off the
ground, documenting positive results justifies the Partnering Initiative to
elected officials and other municipal staff. This aspect may be particularly useful
to convince those who are skeptical or resistant to change. Evaluation reports
can be used internally for strategic planning purposes, as well as externally for
sharing efficient governance efforts with the public.
Outcome evaluation should document both monetary and non-monetary
benefits through annual surveys. Staff should identify the following
information:
• Cost of services to each municipality before they began
sharing services: This information establishes a baseline to determine
cost savings.
• Cost of service to each municipality after service sharing
to identify savings: These responses can be used to calculate the
individual cost-savings for each municipality, as well as the total cost-
savings for the group.
• Benefits of service sharing: Communities can monitor both
quantitative and qualitative benefits of service sharing. Quantitatively,
communities can track performance data such as response times or
resident complaints for various services. These metrics should be
designed to appropriate measure service quality depending upon the
specific shared service project. Qualitatively, when communities cannot
demonstrate cost-savings, it is important to also note the extent of non-
monetary benefits that may have resulted from shared service activities.
It is important to note that evaluation standards, including benefit-cost
analyses, should be developed for each shared service project. Developing
shared project-by-project evaluation metrics ahead of time can help ensure
that communities use a standard methodology of comparing financial and
other impacts of shared services.
These results should be documented in a centralized tracking document
that can be shared with all involved municipalities. The partner
communities should also survey neighboring municipalities that are
not involved in the shared service initiative. Their results can also be
used as control comparisons to account for exogenous variables, such
as macroeconomic forces that affect the cost of services. This can also
raise awareness about shared service opportunities with other nearby
communities.
An example of the MPI cost tracking spreadsheet is shown on the next
page.
Evaluating the Initiative
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study58
The communities can also seek input from the public about shared
service projects. Since municipal services ultimately serve a community’s
residents, it is important to gauge community responses to shared service
projects. Staff may also want to seek public input before launching a
shared service project to determine public support for a proposed shared
service, and to ensure that the nature of service delivery meets public
expectations.
Input can be garnered through various ways, including point of comment
cards, focus groups, surveys made available through municipal facilities,
newsletters, websites, or water bill inserts, and discussions at public
meetings.
Table 6.1 MPI Cost Tracking Spreadsheet
Project Number of Communities Total Project Value Savings
Crack-Sealing 15 $555,000 $40,000-50,000
Resurfacing (Lake Groups 1 & 2)4 $3,200,000 $101,000-121,000
Resurfacing (Cook)2 $2,300,000 $148,000-158,000
Concrete Flatwork (Groups 1-5)15 $890,000 $57,000-77,000
Concrete Pavement (Groups 1 & 2)4 $537,000 $15,000-19,000
Sewer Lining (Groups 1-4)14 $4,000,000 $51,000-61,000
Sewer Televising 6 $261,000 $56,000-66,000
Contractor Assistance 9 $126,000 $23,000-31,000
Leak Detection 3 $71,000 $5,000-8,000
Hydrant Painting 6 $74,000 $20,000-30,000
Asphalt Patching 2 $173,000 $2,000-4,000
Cold Patch 8 $138,000 X
Hauling & Delivery 5 $500,000 $2,000-4,000
Pavement Marking 4 $167,000 X
Custodial Services 8 $534,000 $12,000-14,000
Street Sweeping 3 $174,000 $2,000-4,000
Generator Maintenance 7 $96,000 $18,000-24,000
Total Savings Realized $552,000-671,000
Source: MPI Presentation, 30 October 2014.
59Sustaining the Initiative
The evaluation should also help municipal staff improve their efforts in
the future. As some examples show, shared services do not always result
in expected benefits. Honest evaluation also establishes transparency and
trust among municipal partners.
A process evaluation should focus on qualitative assessments, including
what staff felt worked and didn’t work. This can be conducted through
a simple survey of all staff participants, as well as through an in-person
debrief similar to the cross-departmental Roundtable Exchange.
The Partnering Initiative should also solicit ideas from vendors on how
to improve the process. MPI participants, for instance, reached out to
vendors after contracts were completed to understand vendor needs.
These conversations led municipalities to streamline the invoicing process
to make it easier for vendors to manage multi-municipal contracts in the
future. The Lower Fox River lead contact for each shared service should
be responsible for checking in with vendors—including, if appropriate,
former vendors that did not bid on the shared contract—to improve the
bid process.
Lastly, evaluations of shared services can also be extremely useful
resources for other communities interested in undertaking their
own shared service activities. The many MPI and MMC reports and
presentations were essential training and communication tools for the
Lower Fox River efforts, as well as other members of ICMA.
The annual strategic planning sessions can serve as a forum for compiling
and discussing the results of evaluations. The Administrators should be
responsible for carrying out the evaluation and distilling findings from it.
Evaluations of process should be continual. Evaluation of outcomes
(and of cost-savings in particular) is most critical early on when a
shared service initiative is getting off the ground, but may become less
needed and less applicable as initiatives mature. MPI participants note
that because sharing services is built into their processes, they stopped
evaluating cost-savings after the third year. Surveys of staff and vendors
on the process should be a continual activity so that each new bid can
learn from the last.
Evaluating the Process Evaluation Schedule
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study60
As Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville continue to develop the Lower Fox
River Partnering Initiative, they should be sure to consider the lessons
learned from initiatives undertaken by other communities. Some key
lessons are included below that are drawn from three case studies, which
include a total of over 30 examples of shared services involving over 45
communities. More detailed write-ups of these case studies are included in
Appendix B.
• The Municipal Partnering Initiative (MPI) was founded in 2010
and consists of about 30 participating communities in Cook and Lake
Counties. Recognized by the International City/County Management
Association (ICMA) as a national leader in innovative service delivery,
MPI is the largest and most established shared service initiative in the
region. MPI participants have seen a total estimated savings of over
$1.23 million since the initiative’s inception. Although the size and
scope of MPI is significantly larger than the Lower Fox River Partnering
Initiative, the experiences of MPI participants offer many valuable
insights for the three communities to draw upon. Its members provided
guidance on the process for establishing the Lower Fox River Partnering
Initiative, shared contract templates, and presented at a roundtable with
the three partners.
• The DuPage County Municipal Partnering Initiative (DuPage
MPI) is an offshoot of MPI that includes about 15 members. DuPage
MPI was established in 2013 with significant technical assistance from
MPI’s founding members. The context for the creation of DuPage MPI
is similar to that of the Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative, making it
a useful example of the challenges of cultivating a new shared service
initiative. DuPage MPI participants have had varied success with
saving costs. In fact, some participating members have not found the
initiative to lower service costs at all. These examples can give Oswego,
Montgomery, and Yorkville a better understanding of how and when
communities tend to benefit from sharing services.
• A handful of communities in south suburban Cook County are also
working together to form an Administrative Hub for code enforcement.
The Metropolitan Mayors Caucus, Metropolitan Planning Council, and
South Suburban Mayors and Managers Association have been providing
technical assistance on this effort. The Administrative Hub provides a
useful case of shared services with a smaller group of partners.
As smaller communities, Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville are not
are not likely to see the magnitude of cost-savings as some of the larger
counterparts. Unique characteristics specific to the Lower Fox River
context also differentiate them from the other efforts in the region. The
lessons below can help the partners to anticipate and overcome common
barriers to sharing, but additional challenges will likely emerge as the
Initiative matures.
Lessons Learned
61Sustaining the Initiative
The goals of sharing services identified by the working group are varied
and not always mutually compatible. Although cost-savings was one of the
highest priorities for all of the working groups, prior shared service efforts
in the region illustrate that not all shared service projects reduce costs.
One of the main assumptions of sharing services is that the greater the
demand, the lower the cost. Therefore, it is cheaper for communities to
aggregate their needs rather than deliver the service individually. Empirical
evidence suggests that this is only the case for elastic services whose
prices fluctuate based on the size of demand.
Although this Study recognizes that many aspects of a bid contribute to
the cost of service, there are several examples where joint bidding did not
result in lower contract prices. Some communities found that a number
of labor-based services, including tree trimming and stump removal,
were actually more expensive when jointly bidding. This may be in part
due to the fact that labor costs, which have regulated minimum wages
and many associated overhead costs, are less likely to vary over larger
quantities. This may also be because labor-based services can vary widely
in how they are delivered. For instance, the standards for good trimming,
cleaning, or repairing are not universal. These specification differences
make it hard for vendors to perform a level of service that fulfills all of
the partners’ expectations at a lower cost for each community. This is not
to say that labor-based services never yield cost savings (for instance,
shared custodial services in MPI saved communities between $12,000 and
$14,000), but such contracts are often more variable in specification and
price.
Overall, municipalities reported more consistent savings for commodity-
based services, but even these depend upon the commodity’s pricing
structure and the number of communities involved. For example, because
cold mix is sold at a per-ton rate, the combined quantities for a few small
communities may not be large enough to jump to the next price tier.
As MPI participants had more experience with different shared services,
its members were able to figure out the appropriate pricing structures for
different types of services—but it took some trial and error to do so. Some
of their bids include as few as two communities and as many as eight. As
pictured in the table below, most services are broken down into smaller
bid groups to achieve an appropriate bid size for the type of service. While
many more municipalities participate in MPI than the Lower Fox River
Partnering Initiative, many of their actual bid sizes are comparable.
As Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville work through the specifications
of joint contracts, they should keep in mind pricing structures before
going out to bid. This can be done by talk to vendors and neighboring
municipalities to get a better sense of how pricing may work. For contracts
that need a larger group to achieve cost savings, the communities can
solicit participation of neighboring municipalities.
Although cost is important, the communities should also make sure to
account for the Initiative’s non-monetary benefits, which can be just
as impactful to the productivity, efficiency, and quality of municipal
operations.
Lesson 1: Not all shared services reduce costs
Table 6.2 MPI Bid Groups, 2013
Project Number of
Communities
Number of
Bid Groups Led By
Resurfacing 6 3 Lake Forest, Glenview &
Lincolnshire
Concrete (Pavement)4 2 Glenview & Highland Park
Concrete (Flatwork)15 5 Glenview, Grayslake, Glencoe,
Kenilworth & Highland Park
Sewer Lining 14 4 Northfield, Cary, Arlington
Heights & Highland Park
Ashpalt Patching 2 1 Lincolnshire
Source: MPI Presentation, 30 October 2014.
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study62
Communities must make major changes to their existing procedures and
specifications when sharing services with other partners. Resolving these
differences can take a lot of upfront staff time to standardize processes,
paperwork, and specifications. Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville should
expect to devote significant time to getting the initiative off the ground.
They should also expect setbacks and difficulties in the early stages of
their partnership.
Other municipalities describe several examples of spending hours to come
to consensus on service specifications and getting derailed over seemingly
minor differences. For instance, the major hold-up on a fire hydrant
painting contract was due to the preference of one paint brand to another.
Other challenges lie in how the contracts are structured. Staff reported
heated debates about how to itemize costs. For example, some
communities in DuPage MPI wanted a road surfacing bid that specified
hourly rates for each laborer, equipment, and activity; some wanted a
simpler contract that included only the total price for a crew; yet others
wanted differentiated rates for weekends and holidays.
In most instances, resolving these differences has been the result of
administrators instructing staff to keep discussing an issue until they
came to consensus. Most communities do report significant value in going
through the painful steps of hammering out the first round of shared
services. Most municipalities interviewed reported that their staff was
initially skeptical about shared services, but that the anxiety dissipated
quickly. The upfront legwork to develop effective processes has resulted
in smoother coordination in the long run. For instance, coordination has
become for so many MPI participants that sharing services was no less
complicated than individually providing them.
It is important to note that even once shared service agreements are
already in place, joint bidding does not replace local project management.
Municipal staff must still devote time to managing individual contracts.
One way to reduce the upfront resources needed to establish shared
services is to work with a neutral third party facilitator to launch the
initiative. The Metropolitan Mayors Caucus’ (MMC) facilitation of
the shared Administrative Hub for the south suburban Cook County
communities is an example of this approach. This approach can work for
initial stages of a project, but requires long-term funding to be sustainable.
For instance, MMC’s involvement in the Administrative Hub is based
upon a one-time grant. CMAP has served a similar role in establishing
the Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative. This underscores the need
for communities to take ownership of the effort once CMAP’s technical
assistance period ends.
Lesson 2: Sharing services requires significant
upfront resources
63Sustaining the Initiative
Communities should be prepared to depart from vendors that they have
historically used when pursuing joint bids. Some joint bids can be more
attractive to vendors because they result in larger contracts in more
municipalities. In other cases, however, vendors may be deterred from
bidding on shared bids. First, joint bids are larger can exclude smaller
local companies that simply do not have the capacity to perform large
contracts. Second, joint bids can be more complex than individual bids,
as they may include different specifications for different communities.
While varied specifications allow flexibility for municipal partners, it can
be operationally or administratively burdensome for some vendors. A
few joint bidding attempts from DuPage MPI communities received on a
few bids, or in one case, no bids, for shared services. With few vendors
to select from in those cases, the DuPage MPI members elected to bid
individually to increase vendor options.
Shared services may also be in conflict with local purchasing policies.
The City of Evanston, for example, was excited about shared services,
but ultimately felt that it went against the city’s buy local policy. This
issue of local purchasing also came up in some of the working groups.
Montgomery’s police department, for instance, has longstanding
relationships with Montgomery automobile repair shops and expressed
a strong preference for using Montgomery-based companies. Each of the
three communities should define their preferences for local vendors in
advance. Sharing services may require a slightly broader definition of local
to include the county or other sub-areas.
The benefit that a community receives from service sharing depends on
many factors, including the community’s previous cost and level of service
delivery. Participants in both MPI and DuPage MPI observed that lower-
capacity communities tended to see greater payoffs of service sharing. Due
to limited staff availability, financial resources, or technical expertise, these
communities often provide a lower degree of service than high-capacity
communities. In the early stages of both MPI efforts, higher-capacity
communities were more likely to take the lead in developing sharing
agreements. Lower-capacity partners were still able to benefit from the
shared services, but did not commit as much staff resources to developing
the joint bids or sharing agreements. Members of both initiatives did,
however, observe that participating in the initiatives built capacity of
lower-capacity communities, who began to volunteer to lead projects in
later stages.
Maintaining parity of service can also be challenging across communities.
Certain services, such as snow removal, are time-sensitive. Instituting
contracts that cover larger areas can mean that a vendor has to phase
service delivery across all of the geographies. Multiple communities
acknowledged that shared services have increased the time it takes to
complete certain tasks. While no one reported backlash from residents as
a result of this, Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville should be cognizant
of how sharing agreements may affect residents. The Study recommends
that the communities build a schedule into the contract upfront so that all
parties, including the vendor, have a clear understanding of when delivery
will occur in different neighborhoods.
Participants of other initiatives recommend being flexible when first
entering shared service agreements to account for service delays or
complications. In the event of these hindrances, shared service veterans
generally report quick returns to smooth service delivery after the vendors
and municipal partners become accustomed to the arrangement.
Lesson 3: Joint bids can affect vendor options
Lesson 4: Shared services can have varying
degrees of impact
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study64
The many challenges identified in these examples underscore one key
lesson: commitment to shared services is a key ingredient to success.
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville can foster commitment by identifying
staff and elected official champions within each municipality that can
support the initiative. Ultimately, the commitment level of the participants
will be the primary driving force to keeping the Partnering Initiative
running.
Many MPI participants experienced setbacks, but those cases have not
derailed the initiatives because the processes that they created remained
strong. Individual efforts that do not result in shared services due to
logistics, bid responses, or other challenges should not be considered
failures. Instead of viewing those efforts as failures, committed
municipalities have learned from those experiences and changed practices
in the future.
Lesson 5: Sharing services requires commitment
65Sustaining the Initiative
Chapter 7
Next Steps
Next Steps
This chapter outlines possible next steps for
Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville to continue
the Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative. The
table below lays out the new activities that the
communities should complete in the next one to
two years to implement the specific shared service
projects outlined in this document.
The communities should not only complete the
shared service projects described in this document,
but continue to build support for the Partnering
Initiative by documenting benefits of shared
services and educating other staff, elected officials,
and the public.
67Next Steps
Engaging Elected Officials
The process is best served if all parties acknowledge the need to review
“political considerations” when vetting a shared service proposal.
More often than not, the public views local governments working
together as good thing. Local elected officials likewise see the value of
intergovernmental cooperation as positive attribute indicative of good
government. It is important to keep elected officials informed of program
progress in initial stages and through the initiative’s lifespan to address
any issues that arise. Strategies to engage elected officials can include
holding educational discussions or yearly review sessions to ensure that
political leaders understand the purpose of the Lower Fox River Partnering
Initiative, have opportunities to provide guidance and feedback to staff,
remain engaged throughout the process, and can be public champions of
the resulting shared service projects.
Table 7.1 Implementation Table
Working Group Activity Timeline
Administration and Finance Send out survey of interest for
shared services in advance of
the Strategic Planning Session
Within 3 months
Develop an education and
outreach strategy to build sup-
port from elected officials and
the public
3-12 months
Hold the first annual Strate-
gic Planning Session to map
out Year 1 of the Partnering
Initiative
6-12 months
Develop contract templates for
service agreements
6-12 months
Evaluate the Initiative 12-18 months (to occur
annually)
Hire a Joint Purchasing Agent
to coordinate joint purchasing
18-24 months
Community Development Execute building safety mutual
aid agreement
6-12 months
Align building code update
schedules
6-12 months
Streamline administration of
code enforcement
12-24 months
Public Safety Establish an equipment sharing
process
6-12 months
Execute a public safety mutual
aid agreement
12-24
Public Works Establish an equipment sharing
process
3-6 months
Undertake a joint mowing
contract
6-12 months
Explore other joint public works
contracts in the strategic plan-
ning session
3-6 months
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study68
Align Shared Service Efforts with
other Planning Priorities
This Study’s review of previous planning documents established the
foundation for intergovernmental collaboration. Now that the Lower Fox
River Partnering Initiative is established, the communities should continue
to include promote shared service efforts in future planning documents,
including comprehensive, strategic, and operational plans. Joint planning
projects should also be included as part of the Partnering Initiative and
integrated into any topically specific plans, such as water supply or bicycle
plans.
The strategic integration of shared service projects across planning
documents can help align activities across department and topic areas
into a cohesive suite of strategies to achieve the communities’ stated
goals. Strategic and operational plans that are aimed at internal processes
can delve deeper into recommendations for implementing specific
shared service projects and reiterate the internal steps needed to keep
the Partnering Initiative running. As the communtiies pursue future
comprehensive, transportation, water supply, or other plans, they should
continue to seek opportunities for additional collaboration.
As the Partnering Initiative grows, it should connect with other groups
working to improve local governance at different scales. First, the Lower
Fox River Partnering Initiative can involve more communities as it
becomes more established. As the group matures, it should continue
informal exchanges with other groups such as MPI and DuPage MPI to
identify new and improved means by which to address potential road
blocks and share best practices.
In addition to these initiatives, the group should connect with Transform
Illinois, a coalition for improve governance efficiency. Established in 2014,
the coalition is led by DuPage County Chairman Dan Cronin, facilitated by
the Metropolitan Planning Council, and made up of government officials,
advocacy groups, research organizations, lawmakers, and CMAP. Transform
Illinois is currently pursuing research and legislative analysis to support
shared services, local government consolidation, and funding reform to
incentivize efficiency. Participation in Transform Illinois can help Oswego,
Montgomery, and Yorkville staff connect local efforts with regional and
statewide policy agendas and learn about other strategies to improve
governance efficiency. The Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative can be
used as a case study for research on the effectiveness of shared services.
Connecting with Regional
Partners
69Next Steps
Appendix A: Oswego,
Montgomery, and Yorkville
Contract Alignment Analysis
Appendix A: Oswego,
Montgomery, and Yorkville
Contract Alignment Analysis
To: Village of Oswego (S. Jones and C. Burns), Village of Montgomery
(J. Zoephel), and United City of Yorkville (B. Olsen)
From: CMAP Staff
Re: Review of Service Contract Alignment
Date: March 18, 2015
Introduction
As the Village of Oswego, Village of Montgomery, and United City
of Yorkville begin to pursue shared service agreements and joint
procurements, attorneys and staff from all three communities must be
comfortable with multiple-municipality procurement activities and vendor
contracts. During shared service workshops, employees recommended that
municipal administrators and attorneys provide template documents and
operating procedure guidelines as a precursor to embarking upon shared
agreements. This memo reviews the alignment of terms, conditions, and
protections for shared contracts across each entity.
Example contracts were requested from each of the subject municipalities
for a side-by-side comparison of the submitted documents. The analysis
was supplemented by additional research on shared service contract
best practices. The summary and recommendations below are presented
to identify contract elements that require alignment in potential shared
agreements. The municipalities may use the findings in this memo to
develop a template shared service contract with standardized terms,
conditions, and protections that can be modified by staff for various
shared services. This memo is not a legal analysis, but a staff review
that identifies areas of consideration for municipal attorneys. Municipal
administrators and attorneys should determine how or whether to address
the identified contract discrepancies.
Documents Reviewed
• Village of Oswego: Contract with Client First Technology for consulting
service to assess Village software
• Village of Montgomery: Agreement for Professional Services (Template
Document)
• United City of Yorkville: Contract with Yorkville Mowing and
Landscaping for landscaping services for 2 Special Service Areas
Comparison of Contract Elements
Overall, many of the core contract elements were found to be in alignment.
Discrepancies are detailed below. Contract elements requiring special
attention in drafting a shared service agreement are highlighted in the
final section of this document. The Village of Oswego’s contract was the
longest document, containing 18 sections, versus Montgomery’s 11 sections
and Yorkville’s five contract sections. Much of the content was similar,
and addressed core contract elements with common language. A detailed
review of the common elements and variations in content or structure are
included in the sections below.
71Appendix A: Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville Contract Alignment Analysis
Table A.1. Summary & Comparison of Contract Elements
Oswego Montgomery Yorkville Aligned?Notes
Preamble •••Yes All use similar language.
Scope of Work
•••
Yes All attach the issued RFP and reference it as an Exhibit within the contract, stating
that the contractor shall furnish services as set forth in the RFP and be compensated
in accordance with the Exhibit.
Compensation •••Yes All refer to compensation as listed in RFP.
Contract Term •••Yes Oswego states the agreement begins on date signed by all parties, Montgomery &
Yorkville refer to RFP- which lists specific dates.
Termination of Contract •••No Oswego & Montgomery reserve right to terminate 14 days after written notice,
Yorkville after 7 days.
Status as Independent Contractor •••Yes All specify that the contractor shall not be considered employee of the municipality.
Bonding Yes None state any requirements for bonding of any type.
Signatures •••Yes All require three signatures (Municipal official, Clerk, Contractor).
Certifications of Compliance with
State and Federal Statutes ••No Level of detail varies for each municipality, ranging from Montgomery’s extensive
listing to Yorkville’s inclusion of zero specified certifications.
Indemnification ••No Yorkville’s provision differs from Oswego and Montgomery.
Additional Services ••No Yorkville does not include language barring modifications w/o consent.
Notification ••No Yorkville does not include contact info for City and Contractor.
Non-Disclosure ••No Oswego & Montgomery include, but differ. Yorkville doesn’t include.
Severability •No Only Oswego addresses severability.
Workman’s Comp Insurance •?•No Required by Oswego and Yorkville, Montgomery unknown.
General Liability Insurance •?•No Required by Oswego and Yorkville (differing amounts), Montgomery unknown.
Commercial Automobile
Liability Insurance •?No Required by Oswego, not required by Yorkville, Montgomery unknown.
Umbrella or Excess Liability Insurance •?No Required by Oswego, Not Required by Yorkville, Montgomery unknown.
• = Element is included in municipality’s submitted contract
? = Unknown
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study72
Contract Elements
Several contract elements were identified as not in alignment (wholly
or in part) among the three municipalities. The categories below (also
summarized in Table A.1) identify differences that may require further
attention by the municipalities during the process of drafting shared
service contracts.
Certifications
Montgomery includes an extensive listing of 11 required certifications of
compliance with state and federal statutes, as well as the contractor’s
Federal Tax Payer ID Number or SSN. Oswego lists two statutes for which
the contractor shall certify compliance (Prevailing Wage Act, Illinois
Human Rights Act) and a general requirement for compliance with laws,
which states that “the Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal,
state, and local laws, rules, and regulations, and all Village ordinances,
rules and regulations now in force or hereafter enacted, in the provision
of the goods and/or performance of the services required under this
Agreement.” Yorkville does not require any certifications of compliance
requirements.
Indemnification
Oswego and Montgomery include clauses that the contractor shall
indemnify and hold harmless the municipality. The Yorkville contract
states that neither the contractor nor the City shall be held liable in
damages caused beyond its control. The extent to which these clauses
provide coverage should be reviewed by legal staff for assurance of
alignment.
Insurance Types Required
Lack of alignment exists for the types of insurance required for
contractors. Oswego requires four types of insurance: Workman’s
Compensation, General Liability, Commercial Automobile Liability,
Umbrella or Excess Liability. Montgomery’s insurance section is very
brief and simply provides two checkboxes with the instruction that
“the contractor agrees that it has either attached a copy of all required
insurance certificates or that said insurance is not required due to
the nature and extent of the types of services rendered hereunder.”
Yorkville requires two types of insurance, Workman’s Compensation and
Comprehensive Liability.
Insurance Amount Required
The dollar amount of General Liability insurance does not appear to
be aligned. Oswego requires $1,000,000.00 of Comprehensive General
Liability insurance in the aggregate. Yorkville requires $1,000,000.00
per occurrence of General Liability insurance, or $2,000,000.00 in the
aggregate. Montgomery’s insurance requirements are not stated within the
contract document.
Termination of Contract
Oswego and Montgomery reserve the right to terminate the contract in
part or whole, upon seven days of written notice. Yorkville may terminate
after 14 days of written notice.
Additional Terms or Modifications
Owego and Montgomery do not allow modifications without written
agreement by all parties. Yorkville does not address this subject.
73Appendix A: Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville Contract Alignment Analysis
Non-Disclosure
Oswego’s contract contains a non-disclosure clause. Montgomery includes
an “Ownership of Records and Documents” clause, which requires that
all records developed in connection with the agreement shall remain
the property of the Village, and that the contractor keep non-FOIA-able
documents confidential. Yorkville does not include a non-disclosure
provision.
Severability
Oswego includes a severability provision. Montgomery and Yorkville do
not.
Other Items
• Oswego includes several additional sections unaddressed by the other
partners: “Assignment; Successors and Assigns,” “Recovery of Costs,”
“Waiver,” and “Integrations.”
• Yorkville includes a provision that the contractor shall meet with
the City “as often as necessary to discuss any and all aspects of the
contract.”
Contract Elements Requiring Further Attention
Based on general research of shared service procurement processes and
review of the submitted contract documents:
• Bid Process Leadership. determination must be made to designate
an involved municipality to lead the bidding process and serve as the
main contact during procurement. Municipal leads may rotate for each
project. Clarity of procedure and responsibility will be essential, for
contractors and municipalities to ensure efficiency during the process of
procurement and contract execution. The municipalities should develop
language and practice that enable project leadership, while clarifying
that all involved municipalities must review and approve the bid award,
execute the agreement acceptance, and maintain individual authorities
and responsibilities throughout contract term. Once the communities
have established the process and designee, appropriate language should
be included within contracts.
• Consensus on Format for Expressing State and Federal Requirements.
The primary differences between contracts stem from the manner
in which requirements to comply with state and federal statutes are
stated. Montgomery, for instance, lists and describes 11 requirements
for certification of statute compliance (including Anti-Bribery, Drug Free
Workplace, and International Boycott), while Oswego listed only two
and Yorkville did not list any. Involved municipalities, with counsel from
their legal staff, should reach consensus on the essential requirements
to include within their contracts to remain legally compliant and
support the objectives of the requirements within a concise document.
If the inclusion of explicit detail on certain requirements is not legally
required, but is included to highlight and emphasize their importance
and necessity for contractors, partner municipalities can discuss to
reach consensus on what to include in any shared contracts.
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study74
• Unique Statutory Requirements. Any unique affidavits or other
items required by local statute for individual municipalities should be
identified and grouped within one section of the contract. Examples
include requirements for references and criteria for disqualified persons
or entities. Any unique requirements not expressly required by statute,
but included as general practice by an involved municipality, should be
examined for utility and included or excluded as applicable.
• Provisions to Ensure Continued Protections. As the number of partners
increases, the involved municipalities should revisit contract language
to ensure that previously assumed protections remain sufficient for
contracts involving multiple municipalities (for example, security
of proprietary data or confidential information). Future contract
language reviews should also provide assurance that no municipality is
responsible in any way for the payments of another municipality in any
event of default.
• Insurance. Insurance requirements differ between Oswego and Yorkville,
and Montgomery’s insurance requirements are not listed in its contracts.
The municipalities and their attorneys should decide how to align the
types and amounts of insurance required. The municipalities should
also determine whether certifications of insurance identify partner
municipalities as additional insured entities.
• Alignment of Deadlines and Procedural Dates. Alignment of deadlines
and actionable dates, whether required by statute or past practice,
should be established. Yorkville’s cancellation of contract after 14 days of
written notice to contractor versus Oswego and Montgomery’s seven-day
requirement is one example of this misalignment.
• Selection Criteria. Preference for local vendors is common for single
municipality contracts. This preference may be formally stated or
informally practiced. A shared agreement will expand geographic
boundaries and modify the relative localness of certain vendors.
Municipalities should be aware that vendors that were previously
deemed preferred due to their proximity may not necessarily continue
this status without special attention to provide language enabling that
status. For instance, a vendor located in Oswego would not necessarily
be considered local to Yorkville, and vice versa. The municipalities
should determine whether any local vendor preferences are generalized
to the aggregate area of all partner municipalities, or whether an
alternate system is adopted to preserve current vendor selection
policies.
• Indemnification. The extent to which the existing indemnify and hold
harmless clauses provide coverage should be reviewed by legal staff, and
appropriate language selected to indemnify partner municipalities.
• Surety. All submitted contracts were aligned in their attention to
requirements for security guarantees, as none required either a bid
bond or a contract bond. This element should be considered aligned, but
consensus on whether this practice will continue going forward should
be confirmed.
• Jurisdiction. A common contract element is inclusion of the applicable
jurisdiction and venue of law governing the contract (i.e., Montgomery’s
contract currently states the venue shall be Kane County). As potential
municipal partners grow, the group should include appropriate language
that is inclusive of all municipalities involved.
75Appendix A: Oswego, Montgomery, and Yorkville Contract Alignment Analysis
Appendix B:
Case Studies
9 http://www.pwmag.com/best-practices/illinois-
municipal-partnering-initiative-mpi_o_3.aspx.Overview
The Municipal Partnering Initiative was established
in 2010 in response to fiscal constraints resulting
from the national economic downturn. The founding
municipalities, including the Villages of Glenview and
Buffalo Grove, developed the group as a new model
of more efficient service delivery. MPI now comprises
35 municipalities in northern Cook, DuPage, Lake
Counties: Arlington Heights, Bannockburn, Buffalo
Grove, Cary, Evanston, Fox River Grove, Glencoe,
Glenview, Glenview Park District, Gold, Grayslake,
Gurnee, Highland Park, Kenilworth, Lake Bluff,
Lake County, Lake Forest, Lake Villa, Lake Zurich,
Libertyville, Lincolnshire, Lincolnwood, Lindenhurst,
Morton Grove, Mundelein, North Chicago, Northbrook,
Northfield, Niles, Park Ridge, Skokie, Vernon Hills,
Wheeling, Wilmette, Winnetka, and Woodridge.
Initiating the Program
The original group of 18 municipalities first identified
about 40 routine services, such as road resurfacing
and sewer lining, and then formed committees to
evaluate and write bid specifications for each group.
Four committees (Public Works, Utilities, Facilities,
and Construction) assessed each community’s
existing programs and contract and, together, drafted
a 30-page front-end document in standard contract
language to cover all four committee groups. The
groups pilot shared service was crack sealing (an
existing purchasing cooperative recently discontinued
the service). Four communities participated in the
initial joint bid contract.
Case Study 1: Municipal
Partnering Initiative (MPI)
How it Works
As a voluntary program, all communities regardless
of past participation are invited to join in whatever
MPI contracts meet their needs. Participation does
not require formal membership, fees, or mandatory
responsibilities. Municipalities can even sign on after
bids are accepted, although up-front participation is
encouraged to ensure MPI receives the best prices
from contractors.
MPI committees annually compile a list of
communities’ desired shared services and
commodities and divide the projects into bid groups
based on budget and geography. To determine the
best approach for each project, committee members
evaluate existing specifications for each community
and select the one that works best for the entire
group.9 Each MPI contract emerges from this
collaborative process on bid specifications.
The participating communities take turns coordinating
the contracts. In the first year, Glenview took the lead
on most projects. By 2014, the leadership was more
distributed: nine communities managed 17 joint bids.
Community leads are expected to:
• Coordinate with participating municipalities to
determine interest and schedule meetings
• Gather information needed for bid specifications
and scope
• Release and receive bids
• Distribute bid results and recommend award
77Appendix B: Case Studies
Once a contractor is selected for the group, each community is responsible
for managing and paying for its own contract. The contract specifications
are consistent, but each community can maintain some individual
requirements.
Shared Services
The early bids were considered low-hanging fruit, chosen to test the
service sharing process and encourage growth in participation. In 2011,
MPI’s first full year, 20 communities participated in 11 joint bids for nine
services. Now, the initiative offers 30 shared services that range from
routine activities with little variation between communities, such as crack
sealing, to complex construction projects with numerous line items, such
as road resurfacing. MPI has even continued its growth and exploration to
partner in other areas, including: IT shared services, inspectional services,
electric vehicle charging stations, and fleet shared services.
A few examples are given below of specific bids completed in 2013, the
number of bidders that the group received, and the awarded contractor for
each service.
Completed Bids, 2013
Project
Number of
Communities
Bid Opening
Date
Number
of Bidders Awarded Contractor
Street Sweeping*3 1/31/2013 4 Hoving Clean Sweep
Cold Patch 8 2/14/2013 1 Peter Baker Son & Co.
Crack Sealing 15 2/21/2013 3 Denlar
Sewer Cleaning*2 2/28/2013 2 Not Awarded
Leak Detection 7 2/28/2013 2 ADS Environmental
Generator
Maintenance*
8 3/28/2013 5 Patten Power
Utility Locating*5 5/28/2013 1 USIC
Cross Connection
Devices
(Municipal)*
4 7/2/2013 5 Amercian Backflow
Tree Maintenance*3 7/30/2013 2 Evaluating
MPI Growth of Services, 2011-2013
2011 2012 2013
Crack-Sealing Crack-Sealing Crack-Sealing
Resurfacing Resurfacing Resurfacing
Concrete Concrete Concrete
Sewer Lining Sewer Lining Sewer Lining
Leak Detection Leak Detection Leak Detection
Hydrant Painting Hydrant Painting Hydrant Painting
Water Meter Testing Water Meter Testing Water Meter Testing
Emergency Contractor As-
sistance
Emergency Contractor As-
sistance
Emergency Contractor As-
sistance
Cold Patch Cold Patch
Hauling/Delivery Hauling/Delivery
Pavement Marking Pavement Marking
Janitorial Services Janitorial Services
Bridge Inspections Bridge Inspections
Asphalt Patching Asphalt Patching
Street Sweeping
Sewer Cleaning
Utility Locates
Tree Maintenance
Generator Maintenance
Cross Connection Control
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study78
Results
Cost Savings
From 2011 to 2013, MPI estimates combined savings ranging from $1.23
million to $1.56 million. Municipalities realize additional efficiencies by
merging engineer and attorney reviews and bid creation, advertising, and
awarding. In addition to cost savings, MPI partners benefit from improved
relations with their peers and counterparts in neighboring communities.
Increased collaboration offers MPI partners the opportunity to share
best practices and learn from each other while researching and providing
recommendations for efficient and cost-effective services. This type
of expanded support network is critical as municipal roles become
increasingly complex and staff members are required to wear many
different hats. The savings for each completed project from 2011-2013 are
detailed below.
Summary of Completed Projects, 2013
Project Number of Communities Total Project Value Savings
Crack-Sealing 15 $555,000 $40,000-50,000
Resurfacing (Lake Groups 1 & 2)4 $3,200,000 $101,000-121,000
Resurfacing (Cook)2 $2,300,000 $148,000-158,000
Concrete Flatwork (Groups 1-5)15 $890,000 $57,000-77,000
Concrete Pavement (Groups 1 & 2)4 $537,000 $15,000-19,000
Sewer Lining (Groups 1-4)14 $4,000,000 $51,000-61,000
Sewer Televising 6 $261,000 $56,000-66,000
Contractor Assistance 9 $126,000 $23,000-31,000
Leak Detection 3 $71,000 $5,000-8,000
Hydrant Painting 6 $74,000 $20,000-30,000
Asphalt Patching 2 $173,000 $2,000-4,000
Cold Patch 8 $138,000 X
Hauling & Delivery 5 $500,000 $2,000-4,000
Pavement Marking 4 $167,000 X
Custodial Services 8 $534,000 $12,000-14,000
Street Sweeping 3 $174,000 $2,000-4,000
Generator Maintenance 7 $96,000 $18,000-24,000
Total Savings Realized $552,000-671,000
Source: MPI Presentation, 30 October 2014.
79Appendix B: Case Studies
Summary of Completed Projects, 2012
Project Number of Communities Total Project Value Savings
Crack-Sealing 14 $557,000 $54,000-64,000
Resurfacing (Lake)4 $3,290,000 $24,000-34,000
Resurfacing (Cook)4 $3,670,000 $64,000-74,000
Concrete (Groups 1 & 2)11 $1,490,000 X
Sewer Lining (Groups 1 & 2)10 $2,500,000 X
Sewer Televising 7 $261,000 $65,000-75,000
Contractor Assistance 9 $126,000 $23,000-31,000
Leak Detection 5 $71,000 $3,000-5,000
Hydrant Painting 6 $74,000 $20,000-30,000
Cold Patch 9 $111,000 $12,000-16,000
Hauling & Delivery 5 $500,000 $2,000-4,000
Pavement Marking 4 $167,000 X
Custodial Services 8 $534,000 $12,000-14,000
Bridge/Retaining Wall 2 $10,000 $12,000-18,000
Total Savings Realized $291,000-365,000
Source: MPI Presentation, 30 October 2014.
Summary of Completed Projects, 2012
Project Number of Communities Total Project Value Savings
Crack-Sealing 12 $421,000 $50,000-70,000
Resurfacing (Lake)3 $2,990,000 $100,000-120,000
Resurfacing (Cook)2 $2,840,000 $80,000-100,000
Concrete 8 $966,000 $15,000-20,000
Sewer Lining (Group 1)5 $1,090,000 $30,000-50,000
Sewer Lining (Group 2)7 $945,000 $60,000-90,000
Sewer Televising 4 $365,000 $16,000-26,000
Leak Detection 5 $71,000 $3,000-5,000
Hydrant Painting 6 $60,000 $8,000-10,000
Water Meter Testing 3 $20,000 $500-1,500
Emergency Contractor Assistance 11 $150,000 $27,000-37,000
Cold Patch (2012 Project)9 $111,000 $16,000
Total Savings Realized $405,500-545,500
Source: MPI Presentation, 30 October 2014.
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study80
Time Commitment and Staff Burden
As the initial champion of the program and primary lead agency, the
Village of Glenview provided essential leadership early on that helped
to reduce skepticism among staff regarding the MPI approach. Not all
staff members were receptive to the changes. Getting the initiative off
the ground required all partners to devote significant amounts of time to
developing the program, communicating with lead agencies, and attending
MPI meetings. The largest initial hurdle was generating bid specifications
acceptable to all parties, but renewal contracts have required very little
amendments in subsequent years.
After the heavy-lifting on bid documents in the first year, staff time was
mainly spent managing their community’s portion of the work. While MPI
partners reported reduced administration time and effort in subsequent
years, joint bidding was not a replacement for strong local project
management.
Strategic Project Selection
Not every shared service project has worked for all communities. For
ease of coordination and implementation, administrators increasingly
base project selection on scale and geographic locations, as well as
straightforwardness of contracts. As such, construction projects and
commodities purchasing have emerged as the ideal types of projects for
joint bids. The most challenging joint bid projects involved many line
items, such as road resurfacing, and/or variable levels of expectation, like
custodial services. The key has been to limit the contract price and base
bid groups on size of contract and location.
Degrees of Impact
Most MPI participants report their involvement to be valuable. In general,
smaller communities benefitted the most from economies of scale. In
many cases, the differences in savings between communities were as large
as $10,000 for a single shared service. For instance, the small Village of
Lincolnshire (population 7,275) has reported significant savings across
multiple shared services, including nearly a 40% cost reduction per square
yard of asphalt patching. The much larger Village of Glenview (population
50,690) also reports cost savings through the initiative, but at lesser
magnitudes.
Participants acknowledged that some degree of service is sacrificed by
engaging in shared service work. Road resurfacing, for example, took
much longer to do jointly, leaving some roads under construction for
much longer periods of time. The group learned to build in specifications
to address this in advance. This pre-emptive scheduling has reduced
confusion within communities about service delivery and has informed the
structure of the group bids from the onset.
Continual Learning
One of the hallmarks of MPI’s success has been the group’s proactive
approach to improving the initiative. Participant feedback and sustained
communication among partners proved fundamental to improving
the program. Participants regularly utilize a common Dropbox site for
document repository and SurveyMonkey to collect and analyze data.
Significant participant and vendor feedback have improved the process for
all parties with each new bid.
81Appendix B: Case Studies
Overview
The DuPage County Municipal Partnering Initiative was established in 2013
and currently includes 12 municipalities. Its members were inspired by the
successes of the MPI and became interested in forming a similar group for
DuPage communities. Members include Bensenville, Burr Ridge, Clarendon
Hills, Downers Grove, Downers Grove Sanitary District, East Chicago, Glen
Ellyn, Lisle, Lombard, Roselle, Villa Park, West Chicago, and Woodridge.
Initiating the Program
Representatives from DuPage have worked closely with the Village of
Glenview to transfer the process and also attended an MPI manager’s
meeting to gain additional understanding of the process and discuss the
potential of creating a DuPage regional group. The Village of Glenview not
only walked them through the process of developing shared services, but
also provided all of their existing bid documents for DuPage communities
to modify and use.
Unlike the original MPI, which was led by village managers, the DuPage
effort was driven by Public Works Directors from the Villages of
Lombard, Downers Grove, and Woodridge. These Directors first convened
representatives from nine communities to consider joint bidding. They
examined each community’s contracts for crack sealing, concrete flatwork,
and leak detection to determine whether the specifications could be
coordinated and whether quantities were sufficient to generate economies
of scale.
How it Works
The DuPage group follows the MPI approach, which provides for one lead
agency to manage a particular bid process for any communities wishing
to participate. Before deciding which contracts would be included in the
process for 2014, the DuPage Mayors and Managers Conference (DMMC)
distributes a survey to DuPage municipalities to gage interest in jointly
bidding contracts and serving as lead agency, and to compile budget
estimates. Bid groups were then developed based on geographic proximity
and contract values that seemed manageable and appropriate.
DuPage MPI publishes one advertisement for the group for each joint
bid. Each community is eligible to award a contract, reject bids, or pick
their contractor of choice. Like MPI, lead agencies are responsible for
distributing contracts and getting all communities to sign off. They
also coordinate bid openings, meetings, and documents, although each
community prepares its own contract and is in charge of its own contract
oversight.
Case Study 2: DuPage MPI
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study82
Shared Services
In 2014, the group’s first full year, 12 communities participated in about a
dozen joint bids:
• Cold mix
• Concrete
• Contractor assistance
• Crack sealing
• Hydrant painting
• Leak detection
• Landscaping
• Pavement marking
• Resurfacing
• Sewer lining
• Street sweeping
• Tree maintenance
• Truck hauling/delivery
• Water meter testing
The market of shared service opportunities expanded after the first year as
sanitary and park districts, such as Glenbard Wastewater Authority, joined
the DuPage MPI.
83Appendix B: Case Studies
Results
Cost Savings
DuPage MPI communities reported more moderate levels of cost savings
than MPI communities. Smaller communities reported significant cost
savings. Larger communities felt that the program helped control costs of
inflation, but did not experience large cost-savings. In fact, some shared
service projects cost some communities more than if they had pursued
them independently. While some communities have decided to pursue
some services independently, others have continued to share services
together, as well as with other MPI members in Cook and Lake Counties.
While some DuPage participants have been critical of the monetary
benefits of the program, others have focused on the value of its
nonmonetary effects. The program prompted more interaction and
coordination between municipalities and allowed opportunities for
Public Works Directors to share best practices for bid specifications.
The formation of the DuPage MPI has also led to the development of
the DMMC’s Public Works Directors Steering Committee, a recently
established group which meets quarterly to discuss operational issues and
share expertise related to regulatory policy issues.
Time Commitment and Staff Burden
In the first year, larger communities took on the responsibility to resolve
most of the contract nuances and create boilerplate specifications for joint
bidding. Just as MPI participants acknowledged, carrying out those service
sharing activities was often too much for one person or municipality
to manage. The role of lead agency represented a substantial time
commitment. Initially, the group was interested in having DMMC facilitate
the initiative. Ultimately, DMMC chose not to take on that role. Finding
lead agencies to coordinate specific shared service projects continues to be
a challenge for some shared service projects.
Project Selection and Implementation
The DuPage MPI communities reported particular difficulty developing
and carrying out joint contracts. For example, five communities discussed
four different options for hydrant painting—a relatively straightforward
service—and struggled to merge the variations. The group bidding
process led to some disputes with contractors, requiring participating
municipalities to reconvene several additional times. For instance, some
contractors initially requested additional payments for mobilization to
each town. In another case, a vendor did not want to uphold the agreed
upon group rate for one of the smaller communities after a contract was
awarded. So far, the communities have had mixed satisfaction working
with vendors for joint bids.
Degrees of Impact
As with MPI, small communities benefited the most from shared services.
But even more significant than cost savings or cost containment, the
initiative provided small municipalities the opportunity to provide services
which were previously suspended or unavailable. For example, the Village
of Burr Ridge did not receive any bids for crack sealing in 2013 and had
to forgo that service. It has since been able to resume the activity by
participating in a joint crack sealing bid through DuPage MPI.
84 Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study
Overview
The South Suburban Code Enforcement pilot program was launched in
2015 to improve property maintenance and residential code enforcement
in Richton Park, Park Forest, Chicago Heights, and South Chicago Heights.
These four municipalities formed a partnership to share the administrative
aspect of code enforcement through a centralized Administrative Hub. This
effort is a partnership between the communities and Metropolitan Mayors
Caucus (MMC), the Metropolitan Planning Council (MPC), the South
Suburban Mayors and Managers Association (SSMMA) and the South
Suburban Land Bank and Development Authority (SSLBDA), Ancel Glink,
WRB LLC, and DePaul University’s Institute for Housing Studies.
This example is unique from the others profiled in this Study in two key
ways. First, the shared service was formed to address a specific issue:
reducing blight through shared code enforcement strategies. Second, idea
for the initiative is facilitated and financially supported by third party
partners rather than the communities. This pilot program is still in nascent
stages, but provides an interesting example of programmatic cooperation
outside of joint bidding. MMC is interested in expanding the Hub to
municipalities outside of south suburban Cook County.
Initiating the Program
In 2012, a third-party review of code enforcement practices among
SSMMA communities revealed significant variation across standards and
procedures. Recent personnel reductions placed severe constraints on field
inspectors. The increase in vacant property and investor-owned rental
property as the result of the foreclosure crisis put additional burden on
municipalities’ code enforcement departments. SSMMA also reported that
the inconsistent standards and divergent procedures had led to frustration
and uncertainty in development and property investment in vacant and
under-managed properties. The South Suburban Code Enforcement pilot
program was created in response to these concerns.
The inception of the pilot program involved several external organizations.
MMC began working with its members to develop strategies to improve
the capacity of municipal building departments to stabilize declining
housing stocks. The project kickoff included a brainstorming session
with the South Suburban Housing Collaborative members. Multiple
communities expressed a desire to explore service sharing strategies
amongst code enforcement departments as a way to increase staff capacity.
MMC received a grant to work with the four participating communities.
After exploring several options for sharing code enforcement activities,
the group settled on the idea of a shared Administrative Hub to enforce
property maintenance codes.
Research and recommendations from several groups have informed the
development of the Administrative Hub. Partners have prepared several
memos that established basic recommendations for coordinating code
enforcement standards, outlined legal strategies for targeting blighted
properties in non-home rule communities, and discussed the transfer of
home rule powers through intergovernmental agreements.
Case Study 3: South Suburban
Code Enforcement
85Appendix B: Case Studies
How it Works
The Administrative Hub is designed to streamline property maintenance
and code enforcement activities by dedicating centralized staff to handle a
high volume of property maintenance and code enforcement cases using
standard forms, notices, and procedures. Through the initial research
phase, the project team outlined five key functions that The Hub could
focus on:
• Preparing documents to record liens
• Researching title issues and identify interested parties
• Preparing applications for “No Cash” Bids
• Preparing supporting documents for demolition and abandonment
proceedings
• Assisting with administrative adjudication and filing of judgement liens
During the pilot period, the Hub is primarily focusing its initial efforts
on support services for property maintenance liens and “fast track”
remediation and demolition actions. Operations will begin once Building
Department staff identifies a delinquent property and sends information
on its condition to the Hub staff. Depending on whether the structure
is vacant or occupied, the Hub will either reach out to the building
department staff and discuss “fast track” remediation and demolition
options or proceed without notice. The Hub will then send the required
notice to all essential parties and identify a date after which the Building
Department is authorized to take action. Next, the Building Department
will submit a standard Completion Form with invoices for costs incurred.
The Hub prepares and records liens for those costs and, if indicated on the
Completion Form, the Hub will hold liens for up to one year before filing
to combine all costs into a single lien. All recorded liens will be sent to the
appropriate Building Department for local files.
Each task has a significant administrative component that is best carried
out by staff experienced in title searches, document preparation, and other
administrative tasks. The Hub will work with Building Department staff
to prepare all necessary supporting documents for a wide range of liens
and other enforcement actions. Ideally, the Hub will also streamline the
process by preparing form documents, researching title information, and
focusing the efforts of municipal building departments.
The Hub will be jointly managed by the SSMMA and SSLBDA for the
duration of the pilot phase (four to six months). At the conclusion of the
pilot, the Hub will be evaluated and considered for expansion to include
other SSMMA and SSLBDA member communities, and possibly other
communities from other areas of the region.
Expected Results
First and foremost, the Administrative Hub is expected to mitigate
property maintenance violations. The Hub’s specialized focus is expected
to improve efficiencies of code enforcement and expand community
capacities to identify and cite property code violations. For example,
communities noted that searching for titles for vacant properties is
one of the most challenging and time-consuming activities of code
enforcement. The Hub staff can build institutional relationships with
title companies that can allow them to efficiently prepare title reports to
support code enforcements. The Hub will also prepare and enforce liens
for abandoned properties and develop a list of recommended strategies
that municipalities can take for property repair or demolition. Without the
burden of paperwork, inspectors can focus on property inspections in the
field. This approach not only coordinates approaches to code enforcement
across the four communities, but also builds capacity for each of them to
target blighted properties without having to individual rediscover options
each time they need to take action on a problem property.
86 Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study
87Appendix B: Case Studies
Appendix C:
Workshop Materials
Goal-Setting and Visioning Workshop List of Services by Department
Community Development Services
Planning Zoning Ordinances and Codes
Comprehensive, land use, sub-area, and long-
range planning
Updating and reviewing codes and
ordinances
Plan review Zoning Board of Appeals
Citizen advisory committees Inspection/Enforcement
Plan Commission Building inspection
Licensing and Permitting ADA compliance
Permit fee collection Infrastructure inspection
Liquor ICC certification and testing
Farmers Plumbing inspection
Amusement devices Elevator inspection
Video gaming terminal Construction inspection
Solicitors Economic Development
Itinerant merchants Economic development data collection
and analysis
Pawn brokers Business attraction
Taxi cabs Tourism
Raffles Contacts with local developers, property
owners, etc
Massage establishments Assist with applications
Taxi cabs Business grant and loan programs (such
as façade improvement programs)
Raffles Grant writing
Massage establishments
Administration, Human Resources, and Finance Department Services
General Equipment Human Resources
Printers and copiers Payroll
Workstations Employee benefits and administration
Custodial maintenance and supplies Unemployment insurance
Office supplies Staff recruitment
Software Staff development and training
Building department database software Occupational health and drug tests
ESRI ArcGIS Wellness program
Water billing software Helpdesk
Citizen engagement software Community Relations
Building Security Municipal website maintenance
Door system (door fob and keycard)Newsletter (e-newsletter and print)
Honeywell climate system Social media
Video surveillance Press releases
Video surveillance Special events (including farmers
markets, concerts, 4th of July festivities,
movies in the park, baseball leagues)
IT Other Administration
Internet and wi-fi Grant writing
Phone service (including land lines and cell
phones)
Transit (Park and Ride and paratransit)
Servers Legal services
Network wiring, operations, and administration Meeting agendas and minutes
Firewall and antivirus Record maintenance
System repair and set-up FOIA processing
Adjudication proceedings
Voter registration
Electric aggregation
89Appendix C: Workshop Materials
Public Safety Services
Core Police Functions Equipment
Traffic patrol Vehicle maintenance
Arrest and charge individuals suspected of com-
mitting crimes
Car washing/detailing cleaning services
Maintain jail and detention facility Biohazard cleaning services
Conduct investigations Weapon ammunition
Evidence and property control Uniform purchases
Drug enforcement/narcotics Cell blankets cleaning service
Emergency management and training Office supplies
Personnel Cleaning supplies and services
CALEA accreditation Copiers
Training and certifications for staff Ticket books
Firearms training Shredding
Community Policing Administrative
Juvenile services Records maintenance
Junior Policy Academy Verizon wireless
Student Police Academy Comcast
Explorers New World Systems
Neighborhood watch Motorola
Crime prevention Other
Police Commission Adjudication
Citizen Police Academy Special Response Team
Honor Guard and Pipes and Drums Animal control
Police Cadets Pest control
Community Service Officers
Public Works Services
Street maintenance Roadside maintenance
Crack sealing Mowing
Pavement cleaning Litter collection/graffiti removal
Pothole patching Landscaping
Shoulder stone Tree/storm damage removal
Seal coating Street light maintenance (re-lamping,
pole maintenance, fixture repair)
Asphalt overlays Building Maintenance
Drainage Maintenance Floor cleaning/vacuuming
Catch basin cleaning Trash/recycling bin disposal
Ditch maintenance Washroom cleaning
Inlet and manhole maintenance Window washing
Pipe/basin cleaning/repair Interior lighting
Emergency Response Traffic Maintenance
Flood control and washout response Sign system maintenance
Roadway incidents Pavement striping
Disaster response Traffic signal maintenance
Grounds Maintenance Water
Mowing Distribution
Tree trimming Hydrant/valve/water main repair/re-
placement
Power blowing Pump station maintenance
Landscaping (pruning, mulching)SCADA
Edging IEPA monthly reports
Turf aeration Tank maintenance
Herbicides/fertilizers Boil orders/public notifications
Leaf collection Meter reading/testing
Fleet Service line inspections
Scheduled service (oil change, lubrication)Water testing
Repair Wastewater
Routine cleaning Lift station
Small engine (mowers, pumps)Electrical maintenance
Fleet fuel Pump/equipment repair
Specialty equipment Sewer cleaning, repair, televising
Winter Maintenance Inflow/infiltration (I/I) testing
Snow removal (plowing and applying salt)Manhole repairs
Purchase of salt/sand/other deicers
Public Works Services (Continued)
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study90
Visioning Workshop Exercise
Benefit
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
I. Resource Intensive/
Low Benefits
III. Non-Resource
Intensive/Low Benefits
II. Resource Intensive/
High Benefits
IV. Non-Resource
Intensive/High Benefits
91Appendix C: Workshop Materials
Prioritization Workshop
Shared Service Worksheet (insert name)
Existing Context
Oswego Montgomery Yorkville
Does community currently provide this service / program?
(Y/N)
Contract vs in-house
Vendor
Contract start date
Schedule/frequency of service delivery
Expertise or special equipment needed
Software used/needed
Other existing partnerships (county, state, other
municipalities)
Service Sharing
What is needed to create a formalized agreement? For example, consider: What information will you need to gather to present to
your Administrators/Board/Council? What actions, if any, will need to be taken
by your municipality’s Board/Council? Will you be asking for funding or staff time?
Potential benefits of sharing this service
Potential challenges of sharing this service, including any
challenges that may be unique to a particular community
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study92
April Roundtable Exchange Group Discussion Worksheet
1. Since your working groups last met in December / January, what (if any) progress has been made on the
short list of service sharing arrangements you selected to explore?
2. What challenges have your working groups faced in getting shared services off the ground? What (if any)
are the similar issues you’ve encountered across your working groups (for instance, lack of staff time,
inconsistent contract language, Board approval / political impediments, etc.?)
3. What will it take for your working groups to stay on their established paths (for instance, maybe you decided
on quarterly meetings; maybe there are a handful of services you identified to take on at a later date when
the timing is right)?
4. Determine who will report back to the larger group about your discussion.
93Appendix C: Workshop Materials
Lower Fox River Partnering Initiative Shared Services Study94FY1X-XXXX
233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 800
Chicago, IL 60606
312-454-0400
info@cmap.illinois.gov
www.cmap.illinois.gov
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
CA #1
Tracking Number
PW 2015-46
Well No. 8 rehabilitation – professional services agreement
City Council – August 25, 2015
PW – 8/18/15
Moved forward to CC Consent Agenda
PW 2015-46
Majority
Approval
See attached memo.
Bart Olson Administration
Name Department
Summary
Approval of an engineering contract with EEI for design and construction engineering of Well
No. 8 (Grande Reserve).
Background
The attached contract will cover design and construction engineering of rehabilitation of Well
No. 8 in Grande Reserve. Design engineering will be billed as a flat fee of $14,000, and construction
engineering will be billed hourly for an expected cost of $14,000, for a grant total of $28,000. The
engineering and capital cost of rehabilitation were approved in the FY 16 budget in the water fund.
A more detailed description of the work to be performed is provided below, courtesy of EEI:
As we have discussed previously, this is a proactive/preventative measure versus waiting
for a catastrophic failure. It is typical to rehabilitate a deep well every 7-10 years. Well No. 8
was constructed in 2004.
Given the relatively young age of the pump/motor and the anticipation that there are no
significant operational difficulties with the equipment, we believe a rehabilitation of the
pump/motor and column piping are appropriate, as opposed to more intensive work related to
the replacement of these components. EEI’s contract covers specifications and construction
administration/observation for rehabilitation of equipment.
The motor rehabilitation by the contractor would include re-establishing proper
floatation in the mercury seal, replacing the motor oil and oil filter, replacing o-rings, and
cleaning and recoating the motor casing.
The pumping assembly rehabilitation by the contractor would include micrometer
measurements to determine spacing between bushings, pump shaft, impellers, and wear rings
and comparison against manufacturer’s acceptable tolerances. It is assumed that some of these
components will require rehabilitation or replacement to re-establish proper tolerances and
increase the pumping capacity and efficiency. However, a great majority of the pumping
assembly, including the casings, will be reused.
It is expected that the column piping will be sandblasted and recoated, which will extend
the life of the piping.
Televising the well is a common procedure when pulling the pump/motor because it is
beneficial to observe and record the condition of the casing piping and the water producing
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Bart Olson, City Administrator
CC:
Date: August 13, 2015
Subject: Well No. 8 rehabilitation
formation (sandstone) in the well, and this can only be done when the equipment is removed
from the well. It also provides a measurement of well depth, which helps determine if bailing of
sand/fill at the bottom of the well is necessary. We believe it is unlikely any rehabilitation of the
casing or sandstone will be necessary at this time.
The worst case scenario for this project is the need to replace the pump and/or motor
equipment. Unfortunately, we wouldn’t know if any of this is necessary until the pump and
motor are removed from the well and inspected. Although unlikely that equipment replacement
will be required, we believe it is beneficial to obtain pricing for the worst case conditions from
the bidding contractor(s) prior to starting the work. EEI will include a “Mandatory Alternate
Bid Schedule” for items such as motor replacement, motor conversion, pumping assembly
replacement, and column piping replacement. If this work is required, you will then have up-
front pricing locked in for it.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the design and construction engineering contract with EEI for
Well No. 8.
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, IL
Professional Services Agreement - Design and Construction Engineering
THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the United City of Yorkville, hereinafter referred
to as the "City" or “OWNER” and Engineering Enterprises, Inc. hereinafter referred to as
the "Contractor" or “ENGINEER” agrees as follows:
A. Services:
ENGINEER agrees to furnish to the City the following services: The ENGINEER shall
provide any and all necessary engineering services to the City as indicated on the
included exhibits. Design and Construction engineering will be provided for the
rehabilitation of Water Well No. 8, including rehabilitation of existing piping and
equipment and televising of the well. Scope does not include replacement of the piping
and pump, or the replacement or conversion of the existing motor. Engineering will be in
accordance with all City, Standard Specifications for Water and Sewer Construction in
Illinois, Illinois Department of Transportation, and Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency requirements.
B. Term:
Services will be provided beginning on the date of execution of this agreement and
continuing, until terminated by either party upon 7 days written notice to the non-
terminating party or upon completion of the Services. Upon termination the ENGINEER
shall be compensated for all work performed for the City prior to termination.
C. Compensation and maximum amounts due to ENGINEER:
ENGINEER shall receive as compensation for all work and services to be performed
herein, an amount based on the Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost included
in Exhibit 3. Design Engineering will be paid for as a Fixed Fee (FF) in the amount of
$14,000.00 and Construction Engineering will be paid for Hourly (HR) at the actual rates
for services to be performed, currently estimated at $14,000.00. The hourly rates for this
project are shown in the attached 2015 Standard Schedule of Charges (Exhibit 5). All
payments will be made according to the Illinois State Prompt Payment Act and not less
than once every thirty days.
D. Changes in Rates of Compensation:
In the event that this contract is designated in Section B hereof as an Ongoing Contract,
ENGINEER, on or before February 1st of any given year, shall provide written notice of
any change in the rates specified in Section C hereof (or on any attachments hereto) and
said changes shall only be effective on and after May 1st of that same year.
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design and Construction Engineering
E. Ownership of Records and Documents:
ENGINEER agrees that all books and records and other recorded information developed
specifically in connection with this agreement shall remain the property of the City.
ENGINEER agrees to keep such information confidential and not to disclose or
disseminate the information to third parties without the consent of the City. This
confidentiality shall not apply to material or information, which would otherwise be
subject to public disclosure through the freedom of information act or if already
previously disclosed by a third party. Upon termination of this agreement, ENGINEER
agrees to return all such materials to the City. The City agrees not to modify any original
documents produced by ENGINEER without contractors consent. Modifications of any
signed duplicate original document not authorized by ENGINEER will be at OWNER’s
sole risk and without legal liability to the ENGINEER. Use of any incomplete, unsigned
document will, likewise, be at the OWNER’s sole risk and without legal liability to the
ENGINEER.
F. Governing Law:
This contract shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Illinois. Venue shall be in Kendall County, Illinois.
G. Independent Contractor:
ENGINEER shall have sole control over the manner and means of providing the work
and services performed under this agreement. The City’s relationship to the ENGINEER
under this agreement shall be that of an independent contractor. ENGINEER will not be
considered an employee to the City for any purpose.
H. Certifications:
Employment Status: The Contractor certifies that if any of its personnel are an employee
of the State of Illinois, they have permission from their employer to perform the service.
Anti-Bribery : The Contractor certifies it is not barred under 30 Illinois Compiled
Statutes 500/50-5(a) - (d) from contracting as a result of a conviction for or admission of
bribery or attempted bribery of an officer or employee of the State of Illinois or any
other state.
Loan Default: If the Contractor is an individual, the Contractor certifies that he/she is not
in default for a period of six months or more in an amount of $600 or more on the
repayment of any educational loan guaranteed by the Illinois State Scholarship
Commission made by an Illinois institution of higher education or any other loan made
from public funds for the purpose of financing higher education (5 ILCS 385/3).
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design and Construction Engineering
Felony Certification: The Contractor certifies that it is not barred pursuant to 30 Illinois
Compiled Statutes 500/50-10 from conducting business with the State of Illinois or any
agency as a result of being convicted of a felony.
Barred from Contracting : The Contractor certifies that it has not been barred from
contracting as a result of a conviction for bid-rigging or bid rotating under 720 Illinois
Compiled Statutes 5/33E or similar law of another state.
Drug Free Workplace: The Contractor certifies that it is in compliance with the Drug
Free Workplace Act (30 Illinois Compiled Statutes 580) as of the effective date of this
contract. The Drug Free Workplace Act requires, in part, that Contractors, with 25 or
more employees certify and agree to take steps to ensure a drug free workplace by
informing employees of the dangers of drug abuse, of the availability of any treatment or
assistance program, of prohibited activities and of sanctions that will be imposed for
violations; and that individuals with contracts certify that they will not engage in the
manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance in
the performance of the contract.
Non-Discrimination, Certification, and Equal Employment Opportunity : The Contractor
agrees to comply with applicable provisions of the Illinois Human Rights Act (775
Illinois Compiled Statutes 5), the U.S. Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities
Act, Section 504 of the U.S. Rehabilitation Act and the rules applicable to each. The
equal opportunity clause of Section 750.10 of the Illinois Department of Human Rights
Rules is specifically incorporated herein. The Contractor shall comply with Executive
Order 11246, entitled Equal Employment Opportunity, as amended by Executive Order
11375, and as supplemented by U.S. Department of Labor regulations (41 C.F.R. Chapter
60). The Contractor agrees to incorporate this clause into all subcontracts under this
Contract.
International Boycott: The Contractor certifies that neither it nor any substantially owned
affiliated company is participating or shall participate in an international boycott in
violation of the provisions of the U.S. Export Administration Act of 1979 or the
regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce promulgated under that Act (30 ILCS
582).
Record Retention and Audits: If 30 Illinois Compiled Statutes 500/20-65 requires the
Contractor (and any subcontractors) to maintain, for a period of 3 years after the later of
the date of completion of this Contract or the date of final payment under the Contract, all
books and records relating to the performance of the Contract and necessary to support
amounts charged to the City under the Contract. The Contract and all books and records
related to the Contract shall be available for review and audit by the City and the Illinois
Auditor General. If this Contract is funded from contract/grant funds provided by the
U.S. Government, the Contract, books, and records shall be available for review and
audit by the Comptroller General of the U.S. and/or the Inspector General of the federal
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design and Construction Engineering
sponsoring agency. The Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with any audit and to
provide full access to all relevant materials.
United States Resident Certification: (This certification must be included in all contracts
involving personal services by non-resident aliens and foreign entities in accordance with
requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Services for withholding and reporting
federal income taxes.) The Contractor certifies that he/she is a: x United States Citizen
___ Resident Alien ___ Non-Resident Alien The Internal Revenue Service requires that
taxes be withheld on payments made to non resident aliens for the performance of
personal services at the rate of 30%.
Tax Payer Certification : Under penalties of perjury, the Contractor certifies that its
Federal Tax Payer Identification Number or Social Security Number is (provided
separately) and is doing business as a (check one): ___ Individual ___ Real Estate
Agent ___ Sole Proprietorship ___ Government Entity ___ Partnership ___ Tax
Exempt Organization (IRC 501(a) only) x Corporation ___ Not for Profit Corporation
___ Trust or Estate ___ Medical and Health Care Services Provider Corp.
I. Indemnification:
ENGINEER shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and City’s agents, servants, and
employees against all loss, damage, and expense which it may sustain or for which it will
become liable on account of injury to or death of persons, or on account of damage to or
destruction of property resulting from the performance of work under this agreement by
ENGINEER or its Subcontractors, or due to or arising in any manner from the wrongful
act or negligence of ENGINEER or its Subcontractors of any employee of any of them.
In the event that the either party shall bring any suit, cause of action or counterclaim
against the other party, the non-prevailing party shall pay to the prevailing party the cost
and expenses incurred to answer and/or defend such action, including reasonable attorney
fees and court costs. In no event shall the either party indemnify any other party for the
consequences of that party’s negligence, including failure to follow the ENGINEER’s
recommendations.
J. Insurance:
The ENGINEER agrees that it has either attached a copy of all required insurance
certificates or that said insurance is not required due to the nature and extent of the types
of services rendered hereunder. (Not applicable as having been previously supplied)
K. Additional Terms or Modification:
The terms of this agreement shall be further modified as provided on the attachments.
Except for those terms included on the attachments, no additional terms are included as a
part of this agreement. All prior understandings and agreements between the parties are
merged into this agreement, and this agreement may not be modified orally or in any
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation
United City of Yorkville
Professional Services Agreement
Design and Construction Engineering
manner other than by an agreement in writing signed by both parties. In the event that
any provisions of this agreement shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the
remaining provisions shall be valid and binding on the parties. The list of exhibits is as
follows:
Exhibit 1: Professional Engineering Services
Exhibit 2: Limitation of Authority, Duties and Responsibilities of the
Resident Construction Observer
Exhibit 3: Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost
Exhibit 4: Anticipated Project Schedule
Exhibit 5: 2015 Standard Schedule of Charges
L. Notices:
All notices required to be given under the terms of this agreement shall be given mail,
addressed to the parties as follows:
For the City: For the ENGINEER:
City Administrator and City Clerk Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
United City of Yorkville 52 Wheeler Road
800 Game Farm Road Sugar Grove Illinois 60554
Yorkville, IL 60560
Either of the parties may designate in writing from time to time substitute addresses or
persons in connection with required notices.
Agreed to this _____day of __________________, 2015.
United City of Yorkville: Engineering Enterprises, Inc.:
_________________________________ ________________________________
Gary Golinski Brad Sanderson, P.E.
Mayor Vice President
_________________________________ ________________________________
Beth Warren Angie Smith
City Clerk Executive Assistant
1
EXHIBIT 1
SECTION A - PROFESSIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES
For purposes of this Exhibit 1 and all attachments hereto, the term “contractor” shall not refer to
Engineering Enterprises, Inc., but shall instead refer to individuals or companies contracted with, to
construct or otherwise manage the project described herein. The ENGINEER shall furnish professional
design engineering services as follows:
1. The ENGINEER will attend conferences with the OWNER, or other interested parties as may be
reasonably necessary.
2. The ENGINEER will perform the necessary design surveys, accomplish the detailed design of
the project, prepare construction drawings, specifications and contract documents, and prepare a
final cost estimate based on final design for the entire system. It is also understood that if
subsurface explorations (such as borings, soil tests, rock soundings and the like) are required, the
ENGINEER will furnish coordination of said explorations without additional charge, but the
costs incident to such explorations shall be paid for by the OWNER as set out in Section D
hereof.
3. The contract documents furnished by the ENGINEER under Section A-2 shall utilize IEPA
endorsed construction contract documents, including Supplemental General Conditions, Contract
Change Orders, and partial payment estimates.
4. Prior to the advertisement for bids, the ENGINEER will provide for each construction contract,
not to exceed 10 copies of detailed drawings, specifications, and contract documents for use by
the OWNER, appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies from whom approval of the project
must be obtained. The cost of such drawings, specifications, and contract documents shall be
included in the basic compensation paid to the ENGINEER.
5. The ENGINEER will furnish additional copies of the drawings, specifications and contract
documents as required by prospective bidders, material suppliers, and other interested parties,
but may charge them for the reasonable cost of such copies. Upon award of each contract, the
2
ENGINEER will furnish to the OWNER five sets of the drawings, specifications and contract
documents for execution. The cost of these sets shall be included in the basic compensation paid
to the ENGINEER. Original documents, survey notes, tracings, and the like, except those
furnished to the ENGINEER by the OWNER, are and shall remain the property of the
ENGINEER.
6. The drawings prepared by the ENGINEER under the provisions of Section A-2 above shall be in
sufficient detail to permit the actual location of the proposed improvements on the ground. The
ENGINEER shall prepare and furnish to the OWNER without any additional compensation,
three copies of map(s) showing the general location of needed construction easements and
permanent easements and the land to be acquired. Property surveys, property plats, property
descriptions, abstracting and negotiations for land rights shall be accomplished by the OWNER,
unless the OWNER requests, and the ENGINEER agrees to provide those services. In the event
the ENGINEER is requested to provide such services, the ENGINEER shall be additionally
compensated as set out in Section D hereof.
7. The ENGINEER will attend the bid opening and tabulate the bid proposal, make an analysis of
the bids, and make recommendations for awarding contracts for construction.
8. The ENGINEER further agrees to obtain and maintain, at the ENGINEER’s expense, such
insurance as will protect the ENGINEER from claims under the Workman’s Compensation Act
and such comprehensive general liability insurance as will protect the OWNER and the
ENGINEER from all claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from
the performance by the ENGINEER or by the ENGINEER’s employees of the ENGINEER’s
functions and services required under this Agreement.
9. The ENGINEER will complete the final plans, specifications and contract documents and submit
for approval of the OWNER, and all State regulatory agencies to meet the project schedule(s) as
summarized in Exhibit 4: “Anticipated Project Schedule – Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation”
dated August 7, 2015.
3
SECTION B - PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING SERVICES
The ENGINEER shall furnish professional construction engineering services as follows:
1. The ENGINEER will review, for conformance with the design concept, shop and working
drawings required by the construction Contract Documents and indicate on the drawings the
action taken. Such action shall be taken with reasonable promptness.
2. The ENGINEER will interpret the intent of the drawings and specifications to protect the
OWNER against defects and deficiencies in construction on the part of the contractors. The
ENGINEER will not, however, guarantee the performance by any contractor.
3. The ENGINEER will evaluate and determine acceptability of substitute materials and equipment
proposed by Contractor(s).
4. The ENGINEER will establish baselines for locating the work together with a suitable number of
bench marks adjacent to the work as shown in the contract documents.
5. The ENGINEER will provide general engineering review of the work of the contractor(s) as
construction progresses to ascertain that the contactor is conforming to the design concept.
(a) ENGINEER shall have authority, as the OWNER’s representative, to require special
inspection of or testing of the work, and shall receive and review all certificates of
inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes,
orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine generally that their content
complies with requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the
Contract Documents).
(b) During such engineering review, ENGINEER shall have the authority, as the OWNER’s
representative, to disapprove of or reject contractor(s)’ work while it is in progress if
ENGINEER believes that such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms
generally to the Contract Documents or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design
concept of the Project as reflected in the Contract Documents.
4
6. The ENGINEER will provide resident construction observation. Resident construction
observation shall consist of visual inspection of materials, equipment, or construction work for
the purpose of ascertaining that the work is in substantial conformance with the contract
documents and with the design intent. Such observation shall not be relied upon by others as
acceptance of the work. The ENGINEER’s undertaking hereunder shall not relieve the
contractor of contractor’s obligation to perform the work in conformity with the drawings and
specifications and in a workmanlike manner; shall not make the ENGINEER an insurer of the
contractor’s performance; and shall not impose upon the ENGINEER any obligation to see that
the work is performed in a safe manner. Exhibit 2 - The Limitations of Authority, Duties and
Responsibilities of the Resident Construction Observer is attached to this Agreement.
7. The ENGINEER will cooperate and work closely with representatives of the OWNER.
8. Based on the ENGINEER’s on-site observations as an experienced and qualified design
professional, on information provided by the Resident Construction Observer, and upon review
of applications for payment with the accompanying data and schedules by the contractor, the
ENGINEER:
(a) Shall determine the amounts owing to contractor(s) and recommend in writing payments
to contractor(s) in such amounts. Such recommendations of payment will constitute a
representation to OWNER, based on such observations and review, that the work has
progressed to the point indicated, and that, to the best of the ENGINEER’s knowledge,
information and belief, the quality of such work is generally in accordance with the
Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning whole prior
to or upon substantial completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the
Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation).
(b) By recommending any payment, ENGINEER will not hereby be deemed to have
represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or examinations have been
made by ENGINEER to check the quality or quantity of contractor(s)’ work as it is
furnished and performed beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER
in the Agreement and the Contract Documents. ENGINEER’s review of contractor(s)’
5
work for the purposes of recommending payments will not impose on Engineer
responsibility to supervise, direct or control such work or for the means, methods,
techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs
incident thereto or contractor(s) compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances,
codes or orders applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. It will also not
impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make any examination to ascertain how or for
what purposes any contractor has used the moneys paid on account of the Contract Price,
or to determine that title to any of the work, materials equipment has passed to OWNER
free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests, or encumbrances, or that there may
not be other matters at issue between OWNER and contractor that might affect the
amount that should be paid.
9. The ENGINEER will prepare necessary contract change orders for approval of the OWNER, and
others on a timely basis.
10. The ENGINEER will make a final review prior to the issuance of the statement of substantial
completion of all construction and submit a written report to the OWNER. Prior to submitting
the final pay estimate, the ENGINEER shall submit the statement of completion to and obtain the
written acceptance of the facility from the OWNER.
11. The ENGINEER will provide the OWNER with one set of reproducible record (as-built)
drawings, and two sets of prints at no additional cost to the OWNER. Such drawings will be
based upon construction records provided by the contractor during construction and reviewed by
the resident construction observer and from the resident construction observer’s construction
data.
12. If State Statutes require notices and advertisements of final payment, the ENGINEER shall assist
in their preparation.
13. The ENGINEER will be available to furnish engineering services and consultations necessary to
correct unforeseen project operation difficulties for a period of one year after the date of
statement of substantial completion of the facility. This service will include instruction of the
OWNER in initial project operation and maintenance but will not include supervision of normal
6
operation of the system. Such consultation and advice shall be at the hourly rates as described in
the attached Exhibit 5: Standard Schedule of Charges dated January 1, 2015. The ENGINEER
will assist the OWNER in performing a review of the project during the 11th month after the
date of the certificate of substantial completion.
14. The ENGINEER further agrees to obtain and maintain, at the ENGINEER’s expense, such
insurance as will protect the ENGINEER from claims under the Workman’s Compensation Act
and such comprehensive general liability insurance as will protect the OWNER and the
ENGINEER from all claims for bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from
the performance by the ENGINEER or by the ENGINEER’s employees of the ENGINEER’s
functions and services required under this Agreement.
15. The ENGINEER will provide construction engineering services in accordance with the periods
summarized in Exhibit 4: “Anticipated Project Schedule – Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation”
dated August 7, 2015.
If the above is not accomplished within the time period specified, this Agreement may be terminated by
the OWNER. The time for completion may be extended by the OWNER for a reasonable time if
completion is delayed due to unforeseeable cases beyond the control and without the fault or negligence
of the ENGINEER. Pursuant to Paragraph D “Changes in Rates of Compensation”, the contract shall be
designated on-going consistent with the project schedule.
7
SECTION C – COMPENSATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
1. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for professional design engineering services in
the amount of Fourteen Thousand Dollars – Fixed Fee (FF) ($14,000.00 FF) as summarized on
Exhibit 3: “Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost for Professional Engineering
Services for Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation” dated August 7, 2015.
(a) The compensation for the professional design engineering services shall be payable as
follows:
(1) A sum which does not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the total compensation
payable under Section C-1 shall be paid in monthly increments for work actually
completed and invoiced, for grant administration and for the preparation and
submission to the OWNER of the construction drawings, specifications, cost
estimates and contract documents.
(2) A sum which, together with the compensation paid pursuant to Section C-1(a)(1)
above, equals one hundred percent (100%) of the total compensation due and
payable in accord with Section C-1 above, shall be due immediately after the
award of construction contract(s) is approved by the corporate authorities.
2. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for the construction administration, construction
observation (including the Resident Construction Observer), and any additional consultation
services on the basis of Hourly Rates (HR) as described on the attached Exhibit 5: Standard
Schedule of Charges dated January 1, 2015. The estimated values are included in Exhibit 3:
“Estimate of Level of Effort and Associated Cost for Professional Engineering Services for
Water Well No. 8 Rehabilitation” dated August 7, 2015 and are estimated at $14,000.00 Hourly
(HR).
(a) The compensation for the construction administration, construction observation
(including the Resident Construction Observer), and any additional consultation and
surveying services shall be payable as follows:
8
(1) A sum which equals any charges for work actually completed and invoiced shall
be paid at least once per month.
3. The OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for direct expenses as identified in the contract
and as noted on Exhibit 3 at the actual cost or hourly cost for the work completed.
(1) A sum which equals any charges for work actually completed and invoiced shall be paid
at least once per month.
4. The compensation for any additional engineering services authorized by the OWNER pursuant to
Section D shall be payable as follows:
(a) A sum which equals any charges for work actually completed and invoiced shall be paid
at least once per month.
9
SECTION D – ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
In addition to the foregoing being performed, the following services may be provided UPON PRIOR
WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF THE OWNER.
1. Site surveys outside of the project limits and other similar special surveys as may be required.
2. Laboratory tests, well tests, borings, specialized geological soils hydraulic, or other studies
recommended by the ENGINEER.
3. Property surveys, detailed description of sites, maps, drawings, or estimates related thereto;
assistance in negotiating for land and easement rights.
4. Necessary data and filing maps for litigation, such as condemnation.
5. Redesigns ordered by the OWNER after final plans have been accepted by the OWNER and
IEPA.
6. Appearances before courts or boards on matters of litigation or hearings related to the project.
7. Preparation of environmental impact assessments or environmental impact statements.
8. Making drawings from field measurements of existing facilities when required for planning
additions or alterations thereto.
9. Services due to changes in the scope of the Project or its design, including but not limited to,
changes in size, complexity, schedule or character of construction.
10. Revising studies or reports which have previously been approved by the OWNER, or when
revisions are due to cases beyond the control of the ENGINEER.
10
11. Preparation of design documents for alternate bids where major changes require additional
documents.
12. Preparation of detailed renderings, exhibits or scale models for the Project.
13. Providing special analysis of the OWNER’s needs such as owning and operating analysis, plan
for operation and maintenance, OWNER’s special operating drawings or charts, and any other
similar analysis.
14. The preparation of feasibility studies, appraisals and evaluations, detailed quantity surveys of
material and labor, and material audits or inventories by the OWNER.
15. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1) work damaged by
fire or other cause during construction, (2) defective or incomplete work of the contractor, and/or
(3) the contractor’s default on the Construction Contract due to delinquency or insolvency.
16. Providing design services relating to future facilities, systems and equipment which are not
intended to be constructed or operated as a part of the Project.
17. Providing other services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement, including services
normally furnished by the OWNER as described in Section E – SPECIAL PROVISIONS –
Owner’s Responsibilities.
Payment for the services specified in this Section E shall be as agreed in writing between the OWNER
and the ENGINEER prior to commencement of the work. The ENGINEER will render to OWNER for
such services an itemized bill, separate from any other billing, once each month, for compensation for
services performed hereunder during such period, the same to be due and payable by OWNER to the
ENGINEER on or before the 10th day of the following period. Payment for services noted in D shall be
at Actual Cost (AC), Fixed Fee (FF) or Hourly (HR).
11
SECTION E - SPECIAL PROVISIONS
1. OWNER’S RESPONSIBILITIES
(a) Provide to the ENGINEER all criteria, design and construction standards and full
information as to the OWNER’s requirements for the Project.
(b) Designate a person authorized to act as the OWNER’s representative. The OWNER or
his representative shall receive and examine documents submitted by the ENGINEER,
interpret and define the OWNER’s policies and render decisions and authorizations in
writing promptly to prevent unreasonable delay in the progress of the ENGINEER’s
services.
(c) Furnish laboratory tests, air and water pollution tests, reports and inspections of samples,
materials or other items required by law or by governmental authorities having
jurisdiction over this Project, or as recommended by the ENGINEER.
(d) Provide legal, accounting, right-of-way acquisition and insurance counseling services
necessary for the Project, legal review of the construction Contract Documents, and such
auditing services as the OWNER may require to account for expenditures of sums paid to
the contractor.
(e) Furnish above services at the OWNER’s expense and in such manner that the
ENGINEER may rely upon them in the performance of his services under this Agreement
and in accordance with the Project timetable.
(f) Guarantee full and free access for the ENGINEER to enter upon all property required for
the performance of the ENGINEER’s services under this Agreement.
(g) Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the OWNER observes or
otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the Project or other event which may
substantially affect the ENGINEER’s performance of services under this Agreement.
12
(h) Protect and preserve all survey stakes and markers placed at the project site prior to the
assumption of this responsibility by the contractor and bear all costs of replacing stakes
or markers damaged or removed during said time interval.
2. Delegation of Duties - Neither the OWNER nor the ENGINEER shall delegate his duties under
this Agreement without the written consent of the other.
3. The ENGINEER has not been retained or compensated to provide design services relating to the
contractor’s safety precautions or to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures
required by the contractor to perform his work but not relating to the final or completed
structure. Omitted services include but are not limited to shoring, scaffolding, underpinning,
temporary retainment of excavations and any erection methods and temporary bracing.
4. The ENGINEER intends to render his services under this Agreement in accordance with
generally accepted professional practices for the intended use of the Project.
5. Since the ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment or services
furnished by others, or over the contractor(s) methods of determining prices, or over competitive
bidding or market conditions, his opinions of probable Project Costs and Construction Costs
provided for herein are to be made on the basis of his experience and qualifications and represent
his best judgment as an experienced and qualified professional engineer, familiar with the
construction industry. The ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids or
actual project or construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by him.
If prior to the bidding or negotiating phase OWNER wishes greater assurance as to project or
construction costs he shall employ an independent cost-estimator.
6. Access to Records:
(a) The ENGINEER agrees to include subsections E-6(b) through E-6(e) below in all
contracts and all subcontracts directly related to project services which are in excess of
$25,000.
13
(b) The ENGINEER shall maintain books, records, documents and other evidence directly
pertinent to performance of Agency loan work under this Agreement consistent with
generally accepted accounting standards in accordance with the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants Professional Standards (666 Fifth Avenue, New York, New
York 10019; June 1, 1987). The Agency or any of its duly authorized representatives
shall have access to such books, records, documents and other evidence for the purpose
of inspection, audit and copying. The ENGINEER will provide facilities for such access
and inspection.
(c) Audits conducted pursuant to this provision shall be in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards.
(d) The ENGINEER agrees to the disclosure of all information and reports resulting from
access to records pursuant to subsection E-6(b) above, to the Agency. Where the audit
concerns the ENGINEER, the auditing agency shall afford the ENGINEER an
opportunity for an audit exit conference and an opportunity to comment on the pertinent
portions of the draft audit report. The final audit report will include the written
comments, if any, of the audited parties.
(e) Records under subsection E-6(b) above shall be maintained and made available during
performance on Agency loan work under this agreement and until three years from date
of final Agency loan audit for the project. In addition, those records which relate to any
“dispute” appeal under an Agency loan agreement, or litigation, or the settlement of
claims arising out of such performance, costs or items to which an audit exception has
been taken, shall be maintained and made available until three years after the date of
resolution of such appeal, litigation, claim or exception.
7. Covenant Against Contingent Fees - The ENGINEER warrants that no person or selling agency
has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or
understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bonafide
employees. For breach or violation of this warranty, the loan recipient shall have the right to
annul this agreement without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or
14
consideration or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage,
or contingent fee.
8. Covenant Against Contingent Fees - The loan recipient warrants that no person or agency has
been employed or retained to solicit or secure a PWSLP loan upon an agreement or
understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. For breach or
violation of this warranty, the Agency shall have the right to annul the loan or to deduct from the
loan or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage, or
contingent fee.
9. Certification Regarding Debarment – The ENGINEER certifies that the services of anyone that
has been debarred or suspended under Federal Executive Order 12549 has not, and will not, be
used for work under this Agreement.
10. Affirmative Action – The ENGINEER agrees to take affirmative steps to assure that
disadvantaged business enterprises are utilized when possible as sources of supplies, equipment,
construction and services in accordance with the Clean Water Loan Program rules. As required
by the award conditions of USEPA's Assistance Agreement with IEPA, the ENGINEER
acknowledges that the fair share percentages are 5% for MBEs and 12% for WBEs.
11. The ENGINEER shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the
performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of 40 CFR
Part 33 in the award and administration of contracts awarded under EPA financial assistance
agreements. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this
contract which may result in the termination of this contract or other legally available remedies.
15
EXHIBIT 2
THE LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE RESIDENT
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVER ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Resident Construction Observer shall act under the direct supervision of the ENGINEER,
shall be the ENGINEER’s agent in all matters relating to on-site construction review of the
contractor’s work, shall communicate only with the ENGINEER and the contractor (or
contractor’s), and shall communicate with subcontractors only through the contractor or his
authorized superintendent. The OWNER shall communicate with the Resident Construction
Observer only through the ENGINEER.
2. The Resident Construction Observer shall review and inspect on-site construction activities of
the contractor relating to portions of the Project designed and specified by the Engineer as
contained in the Construction Contract Documents.
3. Specifically omitted from the Resident Construction Observer’s duties is any review of the
contractor’s safety precautions, or the means, methods, sequences, or procedures required for the
contractor to perform the work but not relating to the final or completed Project. Omitted design
or review services include but are not limited to shoring, scaffolding, underpinning, temporary
retainment of excavations and any erection methods and temporary bracing.
4. The specific duties and responsibilities of the Resident Construction Observer are enumerated as
follows:
(a) Schedules: Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing submissions and
schedule of values prepared by contractor and consult with ENGINEER concerning their
acceptability.
(b) Conferences: Attend preconstruction conferences. Arrange a schedule of progress
meetings and other job conferences as required in consultation with ENGINEER and
notify those expected to attend in advance. Attend meetings and maintain and circulate
copies of minutes thereof.
16
(c) Liaison:
(1) Serve as ENGINEER’s liaison with contractor, working principally through
contractor’s superintendent and assist him in understanding the intent of the
Contract Documents.
(2) Assist ENGINEER in serving as OWNER’s liaison with contractor when
contractor’s operations affect OWNER’s on-site operations.
(3) As requested by ENGINEER, assist in obtaining from OWNER additional details
or information, when required at the job site for proper erection of the work.
(d) Shop Drawings and Samples:
(2) Receive and record date of receipt of Shop Drawings and samples.
(3) Receive samples which are furnished at the site by contrctor, and notify
ENGINEER of their availability for examination.
(3) Advise ENGINEER and contractor or its superintendent immediately of the
commencement of any work requiring a Shop Drawing or sample submission if
the submission has not been approved by ENGINEER.
(e) Review of Work, Rejection of Defective Work, Inspections and Tests:
(1) Conduct on-site inspection of the work in progress to assist ENGINEER in
determining if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents
and that completed work will conform to the Contract Documents.
(2) Report to ENGINEER whenever he believes that any work is unsatisfactory,
faulty or defective or does not conform to the Contract Documents, or does not
meet the requirements of any inspections, test or approval required to be made or
17
has been damaged prior to final payment; and advise ENGINEER when he
believes work should be corrected or rejected or should be uncovered for
inspection, or requires special testing, inspection or approval.
(3) Verify that tests, equipment and systems start-ups, and operating and maintenance
instructions are conducted as required by the Contract Documents and in presence
of the required personnel, and that contractor maintains adequate records thereof;
observe, record and report to ENGINEER appropriate details relative to the test
procedures and start-ups.
(4) Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having
jurisdiction over the Project, record the outcome of these inspections and report to
ENGINEER.
(f) Interpretation of Contract Documents: Transmit to contractor ENGINEER’s clarifications
and interpretations of the Contract Documents.
(g) Modifications: Consider and evaluate contractor’s suggestions for modifications in
Drawings or Specifications and report them with recommendations to ENGINEER.
(h) Records:
(1) Maintain at the job site orderly files for correspondence, reports of job
conferences, Shop Drawings and samples submissions, reproductions of original
Contract Documents including all addenda, change orders, field orders, additional
drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Contract, ENGINEER’s
clarifications and interpretations of the Contract Documents, progress reports, and
other Project related documents.
(2) Keep a diary or log book, recording hours on the job site, weather conditions, data
relative to questions of extras or deductions, list of visiting officials and
representatives of manufacturers, fabricators, suppliers and distributors, daily
18
activities, decisions, observations in general and specific observations in more
detail as in the case of observing test procedures. Send copies to ENGINEER.
(4) Record names, addresses and telephone numbers of all contractor’s,
subcontractors and major suppliers of materials and equipment.
(i) Reports:
(1) Furnish ENGINEER periodic reports as required of progress of the work and
contractor’s compliance with the approved progress schedule and schedule of
Shop Drawing submissions.
(2) Consult with ENGINEER in advance of schedule major tests, inspections or start
of important phases of the work.
(3) Report immediately to ENGINEER upon the occurrence of any accident.
(j) Payment Requisitions: Review applications for payment with contractor for compliance
with the established procedure for their submission and forward them with
recommendations to ENGINEER, noting particularly their relation to the schedule of
values, work completed and materials and equipment delivered at the site but not
incorporated in the work.
(k) Certificates, Maintenance and Operating Manuals: During the course of the work, verify
that certificates, maintenance and operation manuals and other data required to be
assembled and furnished by contractor are applicable to the items actually installed; and
deliver this material to ENGINEER for his review and forwarding to OWNER prior to
final acceptance of the work.
(l) Completion:
(1) Before ENGINEER issues a Statement of Substantial Completion, submit to
contractor a list of observed items requiring completion or correction.
19
(2) Conduct final review in the company of ENGINEER, OWNER and contractor
and prepare a final list of items to be completed or corrected.
(3) Verify that all items on final list have been completed or corrected and make
recommendations to ENGINEER concerning acceptance.
EN
T
I
T
Y
:
ADMIN.WORK
PR
I
N
C
I
P
A
L
S
E
N
I
O
R
SE
N
I
O
R
ITEMCOST
WO
R
K
IN
PR
O
J
E
C
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
HOURPER
IT
E
M
CH
A
R
G
E
M
A
N
A
G
E
R
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
TE
C
H
N
I
C
I
A
N
I
A
D
M
I
N
.
S
U
M
M
.
I
T
E
M
NO
.
W
O
R
K
I
T
E
M
HO
U
R
L
Y
R
A
T
E
:
$
1
8
5
$1
7
5
$1
2
5
$1
2
5
$
7
8
FI
N
A
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
2.
1
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
2
2
-
-
-
4 720$
2.
2
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
2
4
4
-
-
10 1,570$
2.
3
F
i
n
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
,
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
2
16
32
8
- 58 8,170$
2.
4
B
i
d
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
2
8
12
-
4
26 3,582$
Fi
n
a
l
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
:
8
30
48
8
4
9
8
14,042$
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
3.
1
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
2
16
32
-
-
5
0
7,170$
3.
2
R
e
c
o
r
d
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
1
2
2
3
1
9 1,238$
3.
3
O
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
1
8
32
-
-
4
1
5,585$
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
:
4
26
66
3
1
1
0
0
13,993$
PR
O
J
E
C
T
T
O
T
A
L
:
12
56
11
4
11
5
1
9
8
28,035
Pr
i
n
t
i
n
g
=
25
0
$
26,270$
Mi
l
e
a
g
e
=
25
0
$
1,375$
DI
R
E
C
T
E
X
P
E
N
S
E
S
=
50
0
$
390$ 28,035$ 28,535$
G:
\
P
u
b
l
i
c
\
Y
o
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
\
20
1
5
\
Y
O
1
5
1
4
-
P
W
e
l
l
N
o
.
8 Rehabilitation\PSA\[Exhibit 3 - Level of Effort.xlsx]Fee Summary
Au
g
u
s
t
7
,
2
0
1
5
ES
T
I
M
A
T
E
O
F
L
E
V
E
L
O
F
E
F
F
O
R
T
A
N
D
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
D
C
O
S
T
F
O
R
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
F
O
R
EX
H
I
B
I
T
3
W
A
T
E
R
W
E
L
L
N
O
.
8
R
E
H
A
B
I
L
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
Un
i
t
e
d
C
i
t
y
o
f
Y
o
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
,
I
L
TOTAL EXPENSES =
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
=
LABOR SUMMARY
DI
R
E
C
T
E
X
P
E
N
S
E
S
PR
O
J
E
C
T
R
O
L
E
:
Drafting Expenses =
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
=
TO
T
A
L
L
A
B
O
R
E
X
P
E
N
S
E
S
=
WO
R
K
Ye
a
r
:
##
#
IT
E
M
M
o
n
t
h
:
NO
.
W
O
R
K
I
T
E
M
W
e
e
k
S
t
a
r
t
i
n
g
:
7
1
4
2
1
2
8
5
1
2
1
9
2
5
2
9
1
6
2
3
3
0
7
1
4
2
1
2
8
4
1
1
1
8
2
5
1
8
1
5
2
2
2
9
7
1
4
2
1
2
8
FI
N
A
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
2.
1
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
2.
2
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
2.
3
F
i
n
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
,
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
2.
4
B
i
d
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
3.
1
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
3.
2
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
R
e
c
o
r
d
D
r
a
w
i
n
g
s
3.
3
O
b
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
&
Q
C
/
Q
A
Me
e
t
i
n
g
(
s
)
De
s
i
g
n
Bi
d
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
EX
H
I
B
I
T
4
AN
T
I
C
I
P
A
T
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
W
A
T
E
R
W
E
L
L
N
O
.
8
R
E
H
A
B
I
L
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
UN
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
,
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
C
O
U
N
T
Y
,
I
L
Au
g
u
s
t
7
,
2
0
1
5
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
20
1
5
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
M
a
r
c
h
February
Le
g
e
n
d
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
Oc
t
o
b
e
r
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Agenda Item Number
CA #2
Tracking Number
PW 2015-47
Rt 47 Improvements – Rt 71 to Caton Farm Road
City Council – August 25, 2015
PW – 8/18/15
Moved forward to CC Consent Agenda
PW 2015-47
Consideration of Approval
Resolution Consideration
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
IDOT is in the process of completing the Phase I report for the project. One of the items that
IDOT is requiring is the passing of the attached resolution, which confirms the Cities position on
the installation of shared-use paths in the area.
The City had previously reviewed this issue in February 2012 (see attached) and determined that
paths as a part of the Rt 47 project were not desired since other paths are planned nearby.
Staff is recommending approval of the resolution. If you have any questions or require
additional information, please let us know.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk
Date: August 7, 2015
Subject: Rt 47 Improvements (Rt 71 to Caton Farm Road)
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council—February 28,2012—Page 10 of 13
City Administrator Olson stated the simple answer is there are different land specifications. You can tell
the developer as part of the plat to do a different grading plan. It seem like to him that this is more of a
matter of fact that the developer doesn't exist anymore and we missed our own bidding deadline to be
able to get this particular type of grading plan in there and then we figured it out after the fact. "This
would have been something that on site we would have given the developer a grading plan for the site and
said we need a sled hill and we need this area to be clay rather than it being whatever the standard slope
is for a park site in grass."Director of Park and Recreation Shraw stated typically follow that process and
the City takes ownership and starts mowing it and maintaining it immediately,which is a benefit for the
developer and it is a benefit for us. If not,the City makes that developer maintain that area for three years
until there is a good stand of grass. The City comes back later and does the improvement anyway.At this
point it is usually a win,win for the developer and the City and that is why the City worked with them,
but the City didn't have the option.Alderman Gilson stated the City doesn't want to play that safe and
wait and keep that$20,000 in our project fund until we get a developer that will pay for that. City
Administrator Olson stated no.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-7 Nays-1
Munns-aye, Spears-aye, Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,
Milschewski-aye,Teeling-aye,Gilson-nay,Kot-aye
Route 47 Improvements—Rt. 71 to Caton Farm Road
PW 2012-20)
Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to authorize staff to send a response to IDOT as presented in the
memo from EEI Engineer Brad Sanderson dated February 16, 2012. So moved by Alderman Kot;
seconded by Alderman Funkhouser.
Alderman Gilson asked what the ramifications for denying or approving this now related to future
obligations for the City when it comes to the sidewalk placement. City Administrator Olson stated the
City is in the beginning of phase one, so based on past history this is the first step when the City tells
IDOT what Yorkville's plans show and what the City wants and then they come to us at the middle of
phase two for a letter of commitment.Knowing their time line on this,the City is probably 3 or 4 years
off from the middle of phase 2. EEI Engineer Sanderson stated they don't really have a plan for phase 2
yet,but he would say in the next 2 to 4 years. City Administrator Olson stated so they don't have funding
for phase 2. EEI Engineering Sanderson stated not that he is aware of.City Administrator Olson stated
typically their direction has been that as long as the City notifies them before phase 2 that there has not
been any request for reimbursement of funds on their behalf. EEI Engineering Sanderson stated correct.
Alderman Gilson asked if the City has to do this now if they haven't begun doing any engineering with
us. City Administrator Olson stated yes.They are going to do public hearings; they are going to start
doing design plans,they are going to prep documents for a letter of commitments down the road.They are
asking now for the City's direction on where the City would like sidewalks,bike paths, lighting,and etc.
Alderman Gilson asked what is the City's and staff's reasoning for denying sidewalks to the south side of
his ward via a major commercial area versus approving a bike path. Director of Park and Recreation
Shraw stated part of the reasoning is that it is a county parcel that the City would have to cross so the
County would have to agree to continue the sidewalk and then our actual connection is via the bike trail
up to 71 and then over to the commercial area then that way citizens are not crossing a major road without
any sort of pedestrian safety. Alderman Gilson asked if and when that area were to ever be developed
could there be potential for that developer to put a side walk in. EEI Engineer stated if a developer were
to come in and develop it then it would be required for them to have sidewalks on the City's side.
Alderman Gilson stated on the school districts projection for new schools,how is that relevant to all this.
EEI Engineer Brad Sanderson stated traffic. Alderman Gilson asked in regards to lighting where is that
proposed lighting. EEI Engineer Brad Sanderson stated according to state policy it is recommended in
transitional areas,and anywhere there is a raised medium. It is a fairly significant amount of lighting.
Alderman Gilson's last question was on the ditch versus the storm sewer.Where is the proposed open
ditch storm sewer plan?EEI Engineer Brad Sanderson stated no detailed plan has been provided. They
are proposing the urban section from route 71 down to Ament.They were generally looking for whether
or not the City would be interested in open ditches and eliminating storm sewers when possible.There are
no detailed plans.Alderman Spears had a question on item#4 and asked if the City should be a little
more specific that the proposed language be kept to a minimum. Public Works Director Dhuse stated that
would be more or less the intersection. The main thrust of this response was the fact of the medium
lighting. It was a tremendous cost and it would be our cost to bear at instillation. Alderman Spears stated
what if IDOT interprets that as the lighting that they originally wanted. Should the City be specific?EEI
Engineer Brad Sanderson stated we can add some additional text.
Mayor Golinski stated we are voting on a motion to approve this letter with the requested changes.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0
Spears-aye,Colosimo-aye,Funkhouser-aye,Milschewski-aye,
Teeling-aye,Gilson-aye,Kot-aye,Munns-aye
The purpose of this memo is to present draft responses to several items in which IDOT is seeking the
City’s feedback. Back on October 26, 2011 staff attended a Project Study Group meeting at IDOT
District 3 Headquarters in which the project was discussed. As you know, the project is currently within
the Phase I design process.
As a result of the meeting, the City was to respond to several items (listed below in italic). Based on
information and discussion with City staff, we have developed the following draft responses to those
items:
1. Determination of sidewalk placement south of Saravanos – E/W side of 47 and termination point.
City response: Additional sidewalk south of Saravanos Drive is not desired by the City (see
Exhibit A).
2. Determination of need for a shared-use path, north of Windett to 71.
City response: The City has plans for a shared-use path as noted in the attached Exhibit B,
therefore a separate path is not necessary.
3. School Districts projection for new schools in the study area, specifically a new High School.
City response: It is our understanding that the School District’s plans for an additional High
School located south of Route 71 have been placed on hold.
4. Determination on the City’s position on lighting. Lighting is required in areas of raised medians,
which is a local area cost.
City response: The City’s position is that that we are not currently in a fiscal position to fund the
lighting as recommended and any proposed lighting should be kept to a minimum.
5. General opinion on open ditch versus storm sewer.
City response: Generally, the City is open to the use of open ditch versus storm sewer.
Please place this on the February 21st Public Works Committee meeting agenda for discussion. If you
have any questions or require additional information, please let us know.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Laura Schraw, Interim Director of Parks & Recreation
Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk
Date: February 16, 2012
B
r
i
d
g
e
St a g e co ach
L e gio n
R
a
i
n
t
r
e
e
K i n g s m ill
S u t t o n
Fairfa
x
B
a
n
b
u
r
y
W in d ett R id g e
W
e
s
t
o
n
H a z e l t i n e
B o n nie
W
y
t
h
e
W
a
l
n
u
t
M
u
i
r
f
i
e
l
d
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
V
i
e
w
S
a
r
a
v
a
n
o
s
Fountainview
C
l
a
r
e
m
o
n
t
Phelps
Winter
thur
D
r
a
y
t
o
n
St J o s e p h's
Murfield
Candleberry
Meadow Rose
B a l t r u s o l
0200400 Feet
Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
52 Wheeler Road
Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554
(630) 466-6700
www.eeiweb.com
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
FILE:
PATH:
BY:
YO1104
YO1104-EXIST SW.MXD
H:/GIS/PUBLIC/YORKVILLE/2011
KKP
United City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL, 60560
(630) 553-7575
www.yorkville.il.us
ROUTE 47 SOUTH IMPROVEMENTS
YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS -PROPOSED MULTI-USE
PATHS
Legend
City Owned/Maintained Asphalt
County Trail
Private/Public Trail (HOA) Limestone
Proposed Conceptual
COMED TRAIL
R T 7 1
R
T
4
7
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
CA #3
Tracking Number
PW 2015-43
Prestwick/Ashley Pointe Bond Call
City Council – August 25, 2015
N/A
Majority
Approval
See attached memo.
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development
Name Department
Update
Attached is a draft resolution prepared by the City Attorney which approves the completion
schedule proposed by the developer for required public improvements within Unit 1 of the Prestwick-
Ashley Pointe subdivision. The draft resolution also establishes the City’s authorization to the
developer, in exchange for early acceptance, to place the surface course on the roadway of the
development where as otherwise would not have been allowed since seventy percent (70%) of all
adjacent private improvements in the subdivision are not complete.
Upon completion of the public improvements, the developer will then be required to seek formal
acceptance of the infrastructure by the City upon inspection by and recommendation of the City
Engineer. This process will require a City Council vote as each improvement is completed. Should you
have any questions; staff will be available at Tuesday night’s meeting for further discussion.
Summary
Review of Prestwick developer’s proposal for completion of all subdivision infrastructure in
exchange for early acceptance.
Background
This item was discussed at the July 28th City Council meeting. At that meeting, the City Council
was informed of a proposal by the subdivision developer to complete all subdivision infrastructure in
exchange for early acceptance of the infrastructure by the City. The punchlist of the remaining
infrastructure and proposed timeline for completion of said infrastructure is attached. In general, the
developer is proposing to complete all infrastructure this calendar year.
While formal inspections have not been completed, it is the staff’s best estimate that some of the
binder course in the subdivision has failed or is very close to failing. Failure of the binder course
requires a significant rehabilitation effort and would push the engineer’s estimate of probable
construction costs far beyond the current bond amount. It is recommended to make binder course
repairs and place final lift of asphalt on the streets before winter.
The City is not required to accept infrastructure until all infrastructure in an entire final plat unit
is completed. Additionally, the ordinance generally prevents developers from placing final lift of
asphalt on a street until the final plat unit is more than 70% built out. This provision prevents hundreds
of construction truck trips on the streets while the subdivision is being built out. Unfortunately, the
build out of most subdivisions has taken long enough that the useful life of the binder course is reached
before the 70% build out threshold.
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director
CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator
Brad Sanderson, City Engineer
Date: August 20, 2015
Subject: Prestwick-Ashley Pointe Bond Call
It should further be noted that while the intersection improvements at Route 126 are not included
within the punch list, early acceptance proposal or bond amount, IDOT and the City are both requiring
those improvements to be completed before another building permit is issued.
Recommendation
Staff has reviewed the written proposal and timelines provided by the developer, and feel they
are reasonable. Staff recommends early acceptance of the subdivision infrastructure, contingent upon
the infrastructure being completed on time and to the City’s standards.
Resolution No. 2015-__
Page 1
Resolution No. 2015-_______
A RESOLUTION OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, APPROVING EARLY ACCEPTANCE OF CERTAIN
IMPROVEMENTS OF THE PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”)
is a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in
accordance with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State;
and,
WHEREAS, Section 11-5-5 of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance
provides that construction of all subdivision improvements must be completed within 4
years from the date of approval of the final plat unless cause can be shown for granting
an extension of time; and,
WHEREAS, Standard Specifications For Improvements adopted by the Mayor
and City Council on October 12, 2004, provided that completion of the surface course for
roadways may not be placed until at least seventy percent (70%) of all of the adjacent
private improvements are in place; and,
WHEREAS, the Owners of the Prestwick Subdivision has submitted a request to
the City to complete certain roadways notwithstanding that seventy percent (70%) of all
of the adjacent private improvements in that Subdivision have not been completed; and,
WHEREAS, the City agrees that it is in the best interest of the City and the
residents of the Prestwick Subdivision to have these roadways improvements completed
in compliance with the Yorkville City Code in order to permit acceptance by the City
despite the failure to complete all adjacent private improvements.
Resolution No. 2015-__
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council of
the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows:
Section 1: The above recitals are incorporated and made a part of this
Resolution.
Section 2: That the Owners of the Prestwick Subdivision are hereby authorized to
proceed to place the surface course on the roadway within said Prestwick Subdivision
notwithstanding the City’s Standard Specifications for Improvements.
Section 3: The Owners may petition the City for acceptance of any public
improvements upon completion in accordance with City Code as provided in Section 11-
5-8C of the Yorkville Subdivision Control Ordinance.
Section 4: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
approval as provided by law.
Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this
________ day of ____________________, 2015.
______________________________
CITY CLERK
CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________
JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ LARRY KOT ________
CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________
DIANE TEELING ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________
Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this
________ day of ____________________, 2015.
______________________________
MAYOR
This column
added by Stewart
as of 8/11/15,
pending city
acceptance of
work
This column added by Stewart
as of 8/11/15, pending city
acceptance of work
GENERAL ITEMS estimated
completion date proposed contractor(s)
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1COMPLETE AS-BUILT RECORD DRAWINGSLUMP SUM110,000.00 10,000.00 60 daysHR Green
2 INSTALL ROUTE 126/PENNMAN INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS LUMP SUM 0 - -
3 REMOVE DEBRIS/GARBAGE LUMP SUM 1 - -
4EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MAINTENANCELUMP SUM137,500.00 37,500.00 completed
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - GENERAL $ 47,500.00
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
5STRUCTURE CLEANING/FILTER FABRIC REINSTALLATION ON OPEN GRATESLUMP SUM15,000.00 5,000.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
6CLEAN REMAINING STORM SEWER STRUCTURESLUMP SUM15,000.00 5,000.00 60 days Jensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
7CLEANING AND REPAIR OF STRUCTURE #374LUMP SUM12,000.00 2,000.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
8FILLET REPAIR EACH123125.00 15,375.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
9MORTAR MANHOLE/ GROUT PIPESEACH14125.00 1,750.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
10REPAIR ADJUSTING RINGSEACH22125.00 2,750.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
11BENCH REPAIR EACH9125.00 1,125.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
12READJUST FRAME EACH1125.00 125.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
13INSTALL MISSING RUNGSEACH2125.00 250.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
14RESET FRAME AND/OR ADJUSTING RINGSEACH1125.00 125.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
15TELEVISE STORM SEWERFOOT13,7892.00 27,578.00 60 daysCam-Vac
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - STORM $ 61,078.00
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
16STRUCTURE #214 REPAIRLUMP SUM1750.00$ 750.00$ 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
17REALIGN FRAME AND GRATEEACH1125.00 125.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
18MANHOLE REPAIRSEACH4750.00 3,000.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
19CHIMNEY SEAL REPLACEMENTEACH28300.00 8,400.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
20DEBRIS REMOVAL EACH2125.00 250.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
21REINSTALL MARKING POSTSEACH156100.00 15,600.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - SANITARY $ 28,125.00
WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
22CLEAN AND PAINT FIRE HYDRANTSEACH16250.00$ 4,000.00$ 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
23ROTATE FIRE HYDRANTEACH1250.00 250.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
24LOCATE AUXILLARY VALVEEACH1250.00 250.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
25RAISE FIRE HYDRANTEACH1500.00 500.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
26PLUMB VALVE EACH1300.00 300.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
27VALVE REPAIR/REPLACEMENTEACH8750.00 6,000.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
28REPLACE VALVE EXTENSIONSEACH2250.00 500.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
29ADJUST VALVES TO GRADEEACH7250.00 1,750.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
30REALIGN FRAME EACH1125.00 125.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
31REINSTALL MARKING POSTSEACH156100.00 15,600.00 60 daysJensen Excavating/ J&S/ Stewart
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - WATER MAIN $ 29,275.00
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
MAY 28, 2014
PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION - COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
C:\Users\bolson\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\F41SPEAE\PCE Completion Overall - May 2014
This column
added by Stewart
as of 8/11/15,
pending city
acceptance of
work
This column added by Stewart
as of 8/11/15, pending city
acceptance of work
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
MAY 28, 2014
PRESTWICK SUBDIVISION - COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
ROADWAY ITEMS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
32REMOVE WEEDS GROWING WITHIN ROADWAYLUMP SUM15,000.00 5,000.00 Completecomplete
33REMOVE AND REPLACE DAMAGED CURBFOOT11030.00 3,300.00 90 daysD Construction
34 BACKFILL BEHIND CURB FOOT 0 1.00 - Complete complete
35BINDER COURSE PATCHING (5% ASSUMED)SQ. YD.1,58645.00 71,370.00 90 daysD Construction
36BITUMINOUS MATERIALS (PRIME COAT)GAL9,5201.00 9,520.00 90 daysD Construction
37HOT-MIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE, MIX C, N50TON2,74075.00 205,500.00 90 daysD Construction
38HOT-POURED JOINT SEALERPOUND6,3701.50 9,555.00 90 daysD Construction
39PAVEMENT STRIPINGLUMP SUM17,500.00 7,500.00 90 daysD Construction
40 INSTALL SIDEWALK SQ. FT.0 - - n/a n/a
41INSTALL SIGNS AND POSTSLUMP SUM15,000.00 5,000.00 90 daysD Construction
42STREET LIGHT REPAIRSLUMP SUM15,000.00 5,000.00 60 daysHerren Electric
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - ROADWAY $ 242,075.00
LANDSCAPING ITEMS
ITEM NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
43SITE MAINTENANCE/MOWINGLUMP SUM125,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 90 daysStewart
44TREE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENTEACH75225.00 16,875.00 90 daysStewart
45 PARKWAY TREE INSTALLATION EACH 0 - - n/s n/a
46BASIN MONITORING/REPAIRLUMP SUM150,000.00 50,000.00 60 daysStewart
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS - LANDSCAPING $ 91,875.00
TOTAL ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 499,928.00
110% OF ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 549,920.80
C:\Users\bolson\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\F41SPEAE\PCE Completion Overall - May 2014
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
CA #4
Tracking Number
PW 2015-27
2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining Program
City Council – August 25, 2015
PW – 8/18/25
Moved forward to CC Consent Agenda
PW 2015-27
Consideration of Approval
Consideration of Change Order No. 1
Brad Sanderson Engineering
Name Department
The purpose of this memo is to present Change Order No. 1 for the above referenced project.
A Change Order, as defined by in the General Conditions of the Contract Documents, is a written order to
the Contractor authorizing an addition, deletion or revision in the work within the general scope of the
Contract Documents, or authorizing an adjustment in the Contract Price or Contract Time.
Background:
The United City of Yorkville and Visu-Sewer of Illinois, LLC entered into an agreement for a contract
value of $162,524.65 for the above referenced project. The intent of this project was to rehabilitate
various sewers using cured-in-place liners.
Questions Presented:
Should the City approve Change Order No. 1 which would increase the contract amount by $32,040.65?
Discussion:
The following discussion points address the items listed on Change Order No. 1:
Items 1 through 7 represent field installed quantities that vary from the bid. More specifically:
For items 2, 4, 6 and 7 the Contractor identified two lines that were 10” sewers and not 8” sewers
as originally shown on the atlas maps. The two sewers were lined with a 10” liner and paid at the
10” liner unit price.
Items 8, 10 and 12 are related to the Game Farm/Somonauk roadway improvements that the City is
currently constructing. The sanitary sewer on Somonauk between West St. and King St. was slated to be
removed and replaced; however the soil conditions were too poor for traditional removal and
replacement. The sewer and existing service were lined instead. This cost should be charged against the
Game Farm/Somonauk Street Project ($17,130.50).
Items 9 and 11 represent the labor and material cost to grout the heavy leaks that were identified by the
Contractor during the pre-lining cleaning and televising of the sewers. The grouting was necessary in
order to properly line the sewers.
The project is substantially complete. Change Order No. 1 will be the only change order presented
for consideration.
Action Required:
Consideration of approval of Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $32,040.65.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk
Date: August 12, 2015
Subject: 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining
CHANGE ORDER
Order No. 1
Date: August 11, 2015
Agreement Date: June 5, 2015
NAME OF PROJECT: 2015 Sanitary Sewer Lining
OWNER: United City of Yorkville
CONTRACTOR: Visu-Sewer of Illinois, LLC
The following changes are hereby made to the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:
1. Addition of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 10” (Area 1)
175 FT @ $28.50/FT $ 9,987.50
2. Deduction of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 8” (Area 2)
334 FT @ $24.30/FT $ (8,116.20)
3. Deduction of Remove Protruding Tap, (Area 2)
4 EA @ $10.00/EA $ (40.00)
4. Deduction of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 8” (Area 3)
303 FT @ $24.05/FT $ (7,287.15)
5. Deduction of Heavy Rood Cleaning (Area 3)
5 HR @ $375.00/HR $ (1,875.00)
6. Addition of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 10” (Area 2)
334 FT @ $28.50/FT $ 9,519.00
7. Addition of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 10” (Area 3)
332 FT @ $28.50/FT $ 9,462.00
8. Addition of Cured-In-Place Pipe Lining, 9” (Somonauk)
388 FT @ $28.50/FT $ 11,058.00
9. Addition of Grout Joints (16 Total; Base Bid)
20 HR @ $385.00/HR (Labor) $ 7,700.00
10. Addition of Grout Joints (Somonauk)
5 HR @ $385.00/HR (Labor) $ 1,925.00
11. Addition of Grout Joints
56 GAL @ $10.00/GAL (Material) $ 560.00
12. Addition of 10”x6”x30” T-Liner (Somonauk)
1 LS @ $4,147.50 $ 4,147.50
Change of CONTRACT PRICE:
Original CONTRACT PRICE: $162,524.65
Current CONTRACT PRICE adjusted by previous CHANGE ORDER(S): $162,524.65
The CONTRACT PRICE due to this CHANGE ORDER will be (increased) (decreased)
by: $ 32,040.65
The new CONTRACT PRICE including this CHANGE ORDER will be: $194,565.30
Change to CONTRACT TIME:
The CONTRACT TIME will be (increased) (decreased) by 0 calendar days.
The date for completion of all work will be December 11, 2015
Justification
Items 1 through 7 represent field installed quantities that vary from the bid. More specifically:
For items 2, 4, 6 and 7 the Contractor identified two lines that were 10” sewers and not 8”
sewers as called out in the contract documents. The two sewers were lined with a 10” liner
and paid at the 10” liner unit price.
Items 8, 10 and 12 are related to the Game Farm/Somonauk roadway improvements the City is
currently constructing. The sanitary sewer on Somonauk between West St. and King St. was slated
to be removed and replaced; however the soil conditions were too poor for traditional removal and
replacement. The sewer and existing service were lined instead.
Items 9 and 11 represent the labor and material cost to grout the heavy leaks that were identified by
the Contractor during the pre-lining cleaning and televising of the sewers. The grouting was
necessary in order to properly line the sewers.
Approvals Required
Requested by: Visu-Sewer of Illinois, LLC
Recommended by: Engineering Enterprises, Inc.
Accepted by: United City of Yorkville
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.!.!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!!.!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.!!.
!!.
!!.!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
!!.
S
1
-
1
0
S
1
-
1
8
S
1
-
3
3
S
2
-
5
1
S
2
-
5
6
S
2
-
3
8
S
2
-
3
9
S
1
-
3
9
S
2
-
4
8
S
2
-
4
7
S
2
-
4
6
S
1
-
3
8
S
1
-
1
4
S
1
-
1
3
S
2
-
4
0
S
1
-
4
2
S
1
-
1
6
S
1
-
4
4
S
1
-
4
0
S
1
-
1
7
S
1
-
4
1
S
2
-
4
6
A
Mill St
W
F
o
x
S
t
S Bridge St
State St
S Main St
Heustis St E Fox St
Maple St
F
o
x
S
t
S
W Ridge St
Morgan St
E Orange StE Van Emmon St
Adrian St
W Madison St
Blaine St
F
o
x
b
o
r
o
D
r
White Oak Way
El
iz
ab
eth
S
t
E Washington St
River Birch Dr
Illini Dr
N
o
r
w
a
y
C
i
r
Adams St
J a m e sto w n D r
W Van Emmon St
W Or
ange St
Schoolhouse Rd
Olsen St Walter StE Hydraulic Ave E Ridge St
Spruce Ct
W Hydraulic Ave
W Dolph St
Fir Ct
Bell St
W
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
S
t
River Birch Ln
Tomasik Ct Benjamin St
W Beecher St
Jefferson St
Madison Ct
M a ple C t
W Hydraulic Ave
Morgan St
S Main St
W Dolph St
LEGEND !.SANITARY MANHOLE !!.MANHOLE LINING SANITARY SEWER AREA 1 LINING AREA 2 LINING AREA 3 LINING AREA 4 LINING
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
E
n
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
52
W
h
e
e
l
e
r
R
o
a
d
Su
g
a
r
G
r
o
v
e
,
I
l
l
i
n
o
i
s
6
0
5
5
4
(6
3
0
)
4
6
6
-
6
7
0
0
EXHIBIT 1 -LOCATION MAP
w
w
w
.
e
e
i
w
e
b
.
c
o
m
DA
T
E
DA
T
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
O
.
:
FI
L
E
:
PA
T
H
:
BY
:
Ap
r
i
l
2
0
1
5
YO
1
5
0
8
YO
1
5
0
8
_
E
x
h
1
.
M
X
D
H:
\
G
I
S
\
P
U
B
L
I
C
\
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
\
2
0
1
5
\
KK
P
NO
.
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
S
³
Un
i
t
e
d
C
i
t
y
o
f
Y
o
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
80
0
G
a
m
e
F
a
r
m
R
o
a
d
Yo
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
,
I
L
6
0
5
6
0
63
0
-
5
5
3
-
4
3
5
0
w
w
w
.
y
o
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
.
i
l
.
u
s
0400800
20
0
Feet
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
CA #5
Tracking Number
ADM 2015-40
Monthly Treasurer’s Report for July 2015
City Council – August 25, 2015
ADM – 8/19/15
Moved forward to CC consent agenda.
ADM 2015-40
Majority
Approval
Rob Fredrickson Finance
Name Department
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
Be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
Fu
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
J
u
l
y
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
Y
T
D
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
Re
v
e
n
u
e
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
o
f
Bu
d
g
e
t
J
u
l
y
E
x
p
e
ns
e
s
Y
T
D
E
x
p
e
n
s
e
s
Expenses Budget % of Budget Projected Ending Fund Balance
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
F
u
n
d
01
-
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
4
,
8
2
6
,
0
5
9
9
3
7
,
4
8
7
4
,
3
1
6
,
8
7
9
1
4
,
2
0
0
,
6
3
7
3
0
%
1
,
0
9
6
,
0
9
9
3
,
0
1
9
,
6
6
5
1
4
,
1
9
0
,
6
3
5
21%6,123,274
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
F
u
n
d
s
15
-
M
o
t
o
r
F
u
e
l
T
a
x
9
2
0
,
2
8
2
2
4
,
0
1
7
1
0
1
,
7
1
6
4
8
4
,
0
0
0
2
1
%
3
1
,
5
4
9
6
4
,
5
8
1
8
7
1
,
4
9
7
7%957,417
79
-
P
a
r
k
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
5
5
7
,
5
3
6
1
3
1
,
9
9
5
5
3
0
,
4
7
7
1
,
5
8
3
,
2
3
1
3
4
%
1
9
6
,
4
9
4
4
3
4
,
0
4
2
1
,
7
9
5
,
9
4
0
24%653,971
72
-
L
a
n
d
C
a
s
h
1
1
7
,
4
3
0
3
7
,
1
8
8
4
5
,
5
4
7
4
3
0
,
5
0
0
1
1
%
2
8
5
1
1
,
9
0
1
5
8
0
,
8
3
2
2%151,076
87
-
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
s
i
d
e
T
I
F
(
6
0
4
,
8
2
0
)
1
,
5
9
8
,
0
0
9
1
,
6
6
9
,
1
8
2
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
6
6
9
%
1
,
6
3
0
,
0
1
0
1
,
6
6
4
,
0
4
7
9
6
,
5
7
1
1723%(599,685)
88
-
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
T
I
F
2
3
9
,
0
9
6
1
3
7
,
2
2
5
6
5
,
0
5
0
5
7
%
1
,
0
6
1
2
,
9
1
6
3
5
6
,
0
3
0
1%273,405
11
-
F
o
x
H
i
l
l
S
S
A
1
5
,
4
6
2
2
3
6
3
,
6
4
8
7
,
0
7
3
5
2
%
3
5
7
6
2
7
2
9
,
8
3
3
2%18,483
12
-
S
u
n
f
l
o
w
e
r
S
S
A
(
2
0
,
1
0
8
)
1
5
4
9
,
4
6
4
1
8
,
6
0
8
5
1
%
1
3
,
9
2
5
1
4
,
2
1
0
3
7
,
5
9
4
38%(24,855)
De
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
F
u
n
d
UN
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TR
E
A
S
U
R
E
R
'
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
-
f
o
r
t
h
e
m
o
n
t
h
e
n
d
i
n
g
J
u
l
y
3
1
,
2
0
1
5
Ca
s
h
B
a
s
i
s
De
b
t
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Fu
n
d
42
-
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
7
,
8
4
2
1
4
,
4
7
3
1
2
1
,
2
1
2
3
0
2
,
1
3
0
4
0
%
5
0
2
7
,
8
5
0
3
1
0
,
7
7
5
9%101,204
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
F
u
n
d
s
25
-
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
&
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
1
0
5
,
5
7
7
3
5
,
9
9
5
1
1
1
,
9
9
9
4
7
2
,
3
3
8
2
4
%
1
1
3
,
2
2
0
1
5
5
,
7
8
9
6
1
6
,
1
3
0
25%61,787
23
-
C
i
t
y
-
W
i
d
e
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
4
,
6
8
4
,
7
0
6
3
4
,
1
0
4
2
0
5
,
7
4
3
1
,
7
5
7
,
3
2
2
1
2
%
4
1
3
,
2
1
1
5
5
9
,
6
0
7
5
,
9
0
0
,
2
0
4
9%4,330,842
En
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e
F
u
n
d
s
*
51
-
W
a
t
e
r
1
,
0
9
9
,
9
8
8
4
,
3
4
5
,
0
1
9
4
,
9
5
3
,
9
9
8
7
,
6
7
3
,
5
1
9
6
5
%
1
9
9
,
9
2
3
6
1
5
,
9
8
0
7
,
9
4
9
,
7
1
5
8%5,438,006
*
52
-
S
e
w
e
r
1
,
8
2
9
,
6
0
5
1
0
1
,
4
9
7
4
9
2
,
6
4
7
2
,
5
1
6
,
3
5
4
2
0
%
1
9
5
,
1
0
2
5
4
8
,
8
0
0
2
,
9
4
1
,
0
8
7
19%1,773,452
Li
b
r
a
r
y
F
u
n
d
s
82
-
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
4
6
6
,
6
8
3
1
3
,
3
1
2
3
6
1
,
2
1
6
7
2
1
,
4
1
8
5
0
%
7
1
,
9
3
0
1
7
5
,
7
9
8
7
1
6
,
1
2
2
25%652,101
83
-
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
D
e
b
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
-
9
,
7
5
3
3
8
6
,
6
2
1
7
4
9
,
8
7
6
5
2
%
-
1
0
7
,
4
2
3
7
4
9
,
8
4
6
14%279,198
84
-
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
1
2
,
7
1
4
1
,
8
0
1
6
,
4
5
2
2
0
,
0
2
0
3
2
%
1
,
8
9
1
3
,
5
0
3
1
1
,
8
9
5
29%15,663
To
t
a
l
F
u
n
d
s
1
4
,
2
5
8
,
0
5
2
7
,
2
8
5
,
0
4
1
1
3
,
3
5
4
,
0
2
4
3
1
,
1
0
2
,
0
7
6
4
3
%
3
,
9
6
5
,
1
0
7
7
,
4
0
6
,
7
3
7
3
7
,
1
5
4
,
7
0
6
20%20,205,339
*
F
u
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
E
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
c
y
Ro
b
F
r
e
d
r
i
c
k
s
o
n
,
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
/
D
e
p
u
t
y
T
r
e
a
s
u
r
e
r
As
D
e
p
u
t
y
T
r
e
a
s
u
r
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
U
n
i
t
e
d
C
i
t
y
o
f
Y
o
r
k
v
i
l
l
e
,
I
h
e
r
e
b
y
a
t
t
e
s
t
,
t
o
t
h
e
b
e
s
t
o
f
m
y
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
,
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
ed
i
n
t
h
i
s
T
r
e
a
s
u
r
e
r
'
s
R
e
p
o
rt
i
s
a
c
c
u
r
a
t
e
a
s
o
f
t
h
e
d
a
te detailed herein. Further
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
i
n
t
h
e
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
.
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
Minutes #1
Tracking Number
Minutes of the Regular City Council – July 28, 2015
City Council – August 25, 2015
Majority
Approval
Approval of Minutes
Beth Warren City Clerk
Name Department
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS,
HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
800 GAME FARM ROAD ON
TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2015
Mayor Golinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
City Clerk Warren called the roll.
Ward I Koch Present
Colosimo Present
Ward II Milschewski Present
Kot Present
Ward III Frieders Present
Funkhouser Present
Ward IV Tarulis Present
Teeling Present
Also present: City Clerk Warren, City Attorney Orr, City Administrator Olson, Police Chief Hart, Deputy
Chief of Police Hilt, Public Works Director Dhuse, Finance Director Fredrickson, EEI Engineer,
Community Development Director Barksdale-Noble, Director of Parks and Recreation Evans
QUORUM
A quorum was established.
AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA
City Administrator Olson stated that Item # 8 on the consent agenda, Ordinance Authorizing the
Subordination of Surface Rights for Public Road Purposes (PW 2015-42), be moved to the regular agenda
under the Public Works Committee Report.
Alderman Tarulis requested that Item #6 on the consent agenda, Kennedy Road Right-of-Way (PW 2015-
40) and Item #7 on the consent agenda, Kennedy Road Shared Use Path(PW 2015-41) be moved to the
regular agenda under Public Works Committee Report.
Amendment approved unanimously by a viva voce vote.
PRESENTATIONS
Certificate of Appreciation for Retired Park Board Member – Kelly Sedgwick
Mayor Golinski called Kelly Sedgwick to the front and presented him with a certificate of appreciation.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
Senator Rezin
Senator Rezin addressed the Council. She gave an update on what is going on in Springfield, IL, what is
going on with the budget, and what is happening in the district. She discussed the fact that the state is into
its third week working without a budget. The Governor is looking to make structural reforms to improve
the state economy and business climate. She discussed two amendments to be put on the ballot. One was
for term limits for politicians, and the other was a fair amendment for mapping districts. The Governor
insist on forms put in place before addressing the budget and additional revenue. She also discussed
internships within the state to provide the future employees for area businesses. She addressed the
flooding issues in this district and spoke of possible state and federal grants for flood mitigation.
Alderman Frieders asked for information regarding the LDGF funds. She responded that the LDGF is still
being reviewed. With a 4 billion dollar deficit, it may affect LGDF distributions. The Governor wants to
see reforms before making that determination. Alderman Koch asked the status of the motor fuel tax and
she responded that it was still on the table. Teeling asked for clarification on the term limits amendment
and she responded.
CITIZEN COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEMS
None.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Monthly Treasurer’s Report for June 2015 (ADM 2015-33)
2. Ordinance 2015-40 Authorizing the Second Amendment to the Annual Budget for the Fiscal
Year Commencing on May 1, 2014 and Ending on April 30, 2015 - authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute (ADM 2015-36)
DRAFT
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – July 28, 2015 – Page 2 of 5
3. Copier RFP - authorize staff to issue a request for proposals for the leasing of copier Equipment
(ADM 2015-37)
4. Game Farm Road and Somonauk Street Improvements – Authorization No. 1 – authorize the City
Administrator to execute (PW 2015-38)
5. 2014 Road to Better Roads Program – Change Order No. 1 – authorize Mayor to execute (PW
2015-39)
Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the consent agenda as amended. So moved by Alderman
Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Koch.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0
Colosimo-aye, Milschewski-aye, Tarulis-aye, Frieders-aye,
Funkhouser-aye, Koch-aye, Teeling-aye, Kot-aye
MINUTES FOR APPROVAL
1. Minutes of the Regular City Council – June 23, 2015
2. Minutes of the Regular City Council – July 14, 2015
Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve the minutes of the regular City Council meeting of June
23, 2015 and July 14, 2015, as presented. So moved by Alderman Tarulis; seconded by Alderman
Funkhouser.
Alderman Kot stated that on the June 23, 2015 minutes on page 3 under quiet zone he is listed as so
moving and seconding the Railroad Quiet Zone Initiative.
Amended minutes approved unanimously by a viva voce vote.
BILLS FOR PAYMENT
Mayor Golinski stated that the bills were $1,402,423.55.
REPORTS
MAYOR’S REPORT
Resolution 2015-15 Authorizing the Purchase of a Used Leeboy 1000 Paver from Casey
Equipment Co., Inc. and Waiving the Requirement of Competitive Bidding
(CC 2015-59 )
Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve a resolution authorizing the purchase of a used Leeboy
1000 Paver from Casey Equipment Co., Inc. and waiving the requirement of competitive bidding and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Frieders; seconded by Alderman
Koch.
Alderman Frieders asked if the paver would pay for itself over the next few years as opposed to bidding
out the paving work. His question was answered that it would have a positive return. Alderman Frieders
asked if a demonstration could be performed in the Whispering Meadows subdivision. Alderman
Funkhouser asked if the equipment would be purchased outright or with a lease agreement. His question
was answered.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0
Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye,
Koch-aye, Kot-aye, Frieders-aye, Tarulis-aye
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT
Blackberry Woods Cash Deposit Call
(PW 2015-44)
Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to authorize staff to call the cash deposit in the amount of
$174,016.00 for work to be completed in the Blackberry Woods Subdivision. So moved by Alderman
Frieders; seconded by Alderman Kot.
City Administrator Olson said the subdivision developer provided the City with quotes indicating they
were ready to move forward with the subdivision. City staff would be ok to table this for two weeks
provided the developer give signed contracts and a production schedule no later than August 5, 2015. The
developer must perform necessary work by the end of September.
Alderman Colosimo made a motion to table the Blackberry Woods cash deposit call for two weeks;
seconded by Alderman Milschewski.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0
Frieders-aye Tarulis-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye,
Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – July 28, 2015 – Page 3 of 5
Prestwick / Ashley Pointe Bond Call
(PW 2015-43)
Alderman Funkhouser stated this is the bond call and it is informational.
City Administrator Olson discussed the proposal given to the Public Works Committee by the developer
for early acceptance of the roadways for the final surface course. By doing so the City does not have to
call the bond to do this work. Calling the bond would mean the City would accept the roadway as is and
provide little benefit. The Public Works Committee recommends the Council excepts the proposal as long
as the developer provides it in writing by the August Public Works Committee meeting.
Attorney John Philipchuck spoke on behalf of the owners John and Michelle Stewart. He informed the
Council that the first installment was made to the City and asked for early acceptance of the roadways to
save the cost of the City staff by letting the developer do the work themselves with an agreed upon time
schedule with the City. He believes that the project is moving forward and hopes to start building homes
as soon as possible.
Alderman Funkhouser said the early acceptance is one of the big issues. If the Council calls the bond now
as a City then the City will accept it automatically. He doesn't believe it is fair that if the developers do
the work themselves, then the City could sit on that final acceptance for years and have the developers
maintain it. The discussion was that the City Council needs to buy into the idea of early acceptance for the
developers to complete the improvements instead of the City calling the bond. He would like to see this
continue in good faith. Alderman Colosimo's concern was the City puts in these roads for a subdivision
that only has four homes, and then the subdivision starts taking off. That would be great but then the City
streets that were just put in will get ripped up. A couple years later the City will be asked to give money
to fix these streets. Alderman Funkhouser said that issue was addressed. The concern is the further the
City goes along with the base being exposed without a final course, then the more costly it would be.
Then the bond money won't be there to fix it. Then more money will be expended to fix it. It is a catch 22.
It will be something the City has to maintain once the structure comes through but with the bond there is
only so much. To do the work and complete it, it will actually save money now rather than having to rip
out the entire basis. Alderman Frieders acknowledges all the aspects of this decision. He agrees with the
developer that the City should give early acceptance and allow the developer to finish the roads in the
subdivision. He also commented that it is very frustrating that a good number of subdivisions that are
nearly nine years old are without the final course. He has watched the roads deteriorate within his own
neighborhood. Alderman Kot asked if the City calls the bond does the City have a certain amount of time
to have to use that money. City Attorney Orr said if the City calls the bond then it has to be used
immediately for the purpose it was called for. Alderman Teeling and Alderman Koch added to the
discussion. City Attorney Orr said this was informational and what the Council would need is a consensus
for early acceptance. Mayor Golinski stated it sounds like the Council came to a consensus.
Ordinance Amending the Code of Ordinances Regulating On-Street Parking
(Winterberry Drive)
(CC 2014-59)
Alderman Funkhouser entertained a motion to approve an ordinance amending the code of ordinance
regulating on-street parking (Winterberry Drive) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So
moved by Alderman Frieders; seconded by Alderman Milschewski.
City Administrator Olson gave the background on this ordinance and stated this is something that staff
recommends.
Raul Avila, Whispering Meadows Subdivision, lives right across the street from the proposed restriction.
He feels this is not a safety issue, but more of an issue of a resident not wanting someone parking in front
of their property. His son normally parks there. There was a situation where his son's car was leaking oil.
When it was brought to his attention, he cleaned it up right away. He has never met his neighbor and
apologized for the oil from his son's car. He doesn't believe this is a safety issue.
Alderman Funkhouser said this is not an isolated type of location. He would like to consider a parking
study to know where restricted parking should be. He doesn't support this ordinance for a few reasons. He
said this is not a major road but a local street. There is a curve there. This is not going to fix the problem
for this area. It will create more of a problem down the road. Alderman Frieders is the one that received
the initial correspondence about it being a line of sight issue. The more he read it became clear to him that
this wasn't about line of sight but the fact that there are a whole lot of cars parking in a small area and cars
are leaving residue around the area. One of the main reasons he doesn't think this is valid, yet, is because
there are no roads in Whispering Meadows. If a resident goes faster than 25 MPH then that will be trouble
due to pot holes on the roads. Until Faxon connects to Route 47, there is not going to be enough traffic
coming through that area to warrant this ordinance. He believes that if this is going to be done that all the
curves in the City like this should have this restriction at the same time. Otherwise, if this is not done then
there has to be other ways to communicate to stop having cars leak in front of a home.
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – July 28, 2015 – Page 4 of 5
Motion failed by a roll call vote. Ayes-0 Nays-8
Milschewski-nay, Teeling-nay, Koch-nay, Kot-nay,
Frieders-nay, Tarulis-nay, Colosimo-nay, Funkhouser-nay
Kennedy Road Right-of-Way – Plat of Dedication
(PW 2015-40)
Alderman Funkhouser made a motion to accept the plat of dedication and authorize the Mayor to execute;
seconded by Alderman Milschewski.
Alderman Tarulis was opposed to the bike path since its origination. He wanted to point out that this bike
path and the railroad crossing puts more expense onto the City's budget at a time when the City can't
maintain what it has. Alderman Colosimo is also opposed to the bike path. He discussed the financial
implications of this bike path. It is a benefit to the City but it is money that the city doesn't have. It is a
luxury. Alderman Funkhouser said this has been incorporated into the City's budget. Alderman Frieders
doesn't believe this is a luxury, due to the way the City is laid out. Alderman Kot supported the bike path
initially and still supports it today. He asked City Administrator Olson to give an update on the Push for
the Path funding. Alderman Colosimo stated that the amount that was committed was $357,000, and some
money has been raised. The amount raised is not close to the $357,000, yet. Alderman Tarulis discussed
several traffic accidents that have occurred, which went over the curb.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-2
Tarulis-nay, Colosimo-nay, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye,
Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye, Frieders-aye
Kennedy Road Shared Use Path (ITEP) – Railroad Crossing – Petition to Illinois
Commerce Commission
(PW 2015-41)
Alderman Funkhouser made a motion to approve the petition to Illinois Commerce Commission and
authorize the Mayor to execute and authorize staff to submit the petition to the Illinois Commerce
Commission; seconded by Alderman Milschewski.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-6 Nays-2
Colosimo-nay, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye,
Koch-aye, Kot-aye, Frieders-aye, Tarulis-nay
Ordinance Authorizing the Subordination of Surface Rights for Public
Road Purposes (Route 71 and Van Emmon)
(PW 2015-42)
Alderman Funkhouser entertained a motion to approve an Ordinance authorizing the subordination of
surface rights for public road purposes (Route 71 and Van Emmon); seconded by Alderman Frieders.
Alderman Milschewski made a motion to table this ordinance for two weeks; seconded by Alderman
Frieders.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0
Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye, Koch-aye,
Kot-aye, Frieders-aye, Tarulis-aye, Colosimo-aye
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
No report.
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT
No report.
ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT
No report.
PARK BOARD
No report.
PLAN COMMISSION
Self Storage Facility – 147 Commercial Drive – Rezoning and Special Use Permit
(PC 2015-09 and PC 2015-10)
Ordinance 2015-41 Approving the Rezoning to the M-1 Limited Manufacturing
District of the Property Located at 147 Commercial Drive
(Lot 19 of Unit 3 Yorkville Business Center Subdivision)
Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving the rezoning to the M-1 limited
manufacturing district of the property located at 147 Commercial Drive (lot 19 of unit 3 Yorkville
The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council – July 28, 2015 – Page 5 of 5
Business Center subdivision) and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman
Colosimo; seconded by Alderman Tarulis.
Alderman Kot asked about landscaping to the north of the project. Attorney Kelly Helland spoke on
behalf of the petitioners the Terry and Ann Richards. She addressed Alderman Kot's question concerning
the City's requirements and received approval of the landscape plan from the neighbors to the north.
Alderman Funkhouser questioned Attorney Helland about the project.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0
Koch-aye, Kot-aye, Frieders-aye, Tarulis-aye,
Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye, Teeling-aye
Ordinance 2015-42 Approving a Special Use for a Public Storage Facilities/Miniwarehouse
Storage (Lot 19 of Unit 3 Yorkville Business Center Subdivision)
Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to approve an ordinance approving a special use for a public storage
facilities/miniwarehouse storage (lot19 of unit 3 Yorkville Business Center subdivision) and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute. So moved by Alderman Kot; seconded by Alderman Frieders.
Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes-8 Nays-0
Tarulis-aye, Colosimo-aye, Funkhouser-aye, Milschewski-aye,
Teeling-aye, Koch-aye, Kot-aye, Frieders-aye
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
No report.
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
No report.
CITY CLERK’S REPORT
No report.
COMMUNITY & LIAISON REPORT
No report.
STAFF REPORT
No report.
ADDITIONAL BUSINESS
None.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Golinski entertained a motion to go into Executive Session for the purpose of
1. Collective Bargaining
The City Council entered Executive Session at 8:08 p.m.
The City Council returned to regular session at 8:17 p.m.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Golinski stated meeting adjourned.
Meeting adjourned at 8:17 p.m.
Minutes submitted by:
Beth Warren,
City Clerk, City of Yorkville, Illinois
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
Bills for Payment
Tracking Number
Bills for Payment (Informational): $902,820.04
City Council – August 25, 2015
None – Informational
Amy Simmons Finance
Name Department
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
1
1
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
C
T
I
O
N
G
R
A
P
H
I
X
L
T
D
5
4
4
2
0
7
/
2
9
/
1
5
0
1
W
A
R
N
I
N
G
S
I
G
N
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
1
5
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
0
.
0
0
*
5
4
4
8
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
G
O
L
F
S
I
G
N
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
4
8
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
8
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
9
8
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
1
2
A
D
S
A
L
A
R
M
A
L
A
R
M
D
E
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
I
N
C
1
5
8
1
2
7
-
0
7
1
2
1
5
0
7
/
1
2
/
1
5
0
1
J
U
L
-
S
E
P
T
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
2
3
-
2
1
6
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
6
4
9
6
.
8
9
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
9
6
.
8
9
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
9
6
.
8
9
5
2
0
3
1
3
A
L
L
N
U
I
S
A
A
L
L
N
U
I
S
A
N
C
E
T
R
A
P
P
I
N
G
C
O
.
3
6
5
0
5
/
2
9
/
1
5
0
1
B
A
T
I
N
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
1
7
5
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
7
5
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
7
5
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
1
4
A
M
P
E
R
A
G
E
A
M
P
E
R
A
G
E
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
S
U
P
P
L
Y
I
N
C
0
5
8
2
7
8
8
-
I
N
0
7
/
0
8
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
L
A
Y
F
O
R
Y
A
K
S
H
A
K
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
8
8
-
8
8
0
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
0
0
5
6
.
9
8
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
6
.
9
8
*
0
5
8
2
8
6
9
-
I
N
0
7
/
0
8
/
1
5
0
1
D
U
A
L
H
E
A
D
E
X
I
T
S
I
G
N
F
O
R
Y
A
K
8
8
-
8
8
0
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
0
0
9
7
.
0
0
0
2
S
H
A
K
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
9
7
.
0
0
*
0
5
8
3
0
9
1
-
I
N
0
7
/
1
0
/
1
5
0
1
P
H
O
T
O
C
E
L
L
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
1
6
.
4
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
6
.
4
4
*
0
5
8
3
6
3
9
-
I
N
0
7
/
1
4
/
1
5
0
1
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
P
O
W
E
R
T
R
A
N
S
F
O
R
M
E
R
8
8
-
8
8
0
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
0
0
4
2
.
5
0
Page 1 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
1
4
A
M
P
E
R
A
G
E
A
M
P
E
R
A
G
E
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
S
U
P
P
L
Y
I
N
C
0
5
8
3
6
3
9
-
I
N
0
7
/
1
4
/
1
5
0
2
F
O
R
Y
A
K
S
H
A
K
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
2
.
5
0
*
0
5
8
3
6
8
0
-
I
N
0
7
/
1
4
/
1
5
0
1
B
O
X
E
S
,
P
L
U
G
S
,
B
L
O
C
K
G
A
V
I
N
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
9
2
.
9
4
0
2
C
O
V
E
R
,
H
O
L
E
G
A
V
I
N
C
O
V
E
R
,
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
3
C
I
R
C
U
I
T
B
R
E
A
K
E
R
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
9
2
.
9
4
*
0
5
8
4
4
3
4
-
I
N
0
7
/
2
0
/
1
5
0
1
L
A
M
P
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
4
0
8
9
.
1
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
9
.
1
0
*
0
5
8
4
7
7
0
-
I
N
0
7
/
2
2
/
1
5
0
1
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
F
O
R
G
I
N
G
E
R
&
S
O
U
L
8
8
-
8
8
0
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
0
0
1
7
.
2
5
0
2
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
7
.
2
5
*
0
5
8
6
3
3
0
-
I
N
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
L
A
M
P
S
2
3
-
2
1
6
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
5
6
1
4
.
8
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
4
.
8
5
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
2
7
.
0
6
5
2
0
3
1
5
A
T
T
A
T
&
T
6
3
0
5
5
3
6
8
0
5
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
2
5
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
2
5
-
0
8
/
2
4
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
8
8
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
8
8
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
8
8
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
1
6
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
S
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
2
6
0
4
2
7
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
8
8
9
.
5
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
9
.
5
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
9
.
5
0
5
2
0
3
1
7
B
C
B
S
B
L
U
E
C
R
O
S
S
B
L
U
E
S
H
I
E
L
D
Page 2 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
1
7
B
C
B
S
B
L
U
E
C
R
O
S
S
B
L
U
E
S
H
I
E
L
D
0
8
1
0
1
5
0
8
/
1
0
/
1
5
0
1
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
5
,
7
8
6
.
4
8
0
2
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
3
5
1
,
7
4
2
.
5
2
0
3
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
1
,
7
4
2
.
5
2
0
4
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
4
4
,
8
0
4
.
2
1
0
5
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
5
,
7
6
5
.
9
5
0
6
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
8
,
7
3
7
.
3
2
0
7
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
4
0
7
,
0
9
7
.
9
4
0
8
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
7
,
5
0
8
.
0
4
0
9
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
5
,
5
2
2
.
9
0
1
0
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
9
,
4
8
4
.
0
2
1
1
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
3
,
4
4
0
.
0
2
1
2
S
E
P
T
E
M
B
E
R
2
0
1
5
H
E
A
L
T
H
I
N
S
8
2
-
8
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
5
,
1
7
4
.
1
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
6
,
8
0
6
.
0
7
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
6
,
8
0
6
.
0
7
5
2
0
3
1
8
B
K
F
D
B
R
I
S
T
O
L
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
F
I
R
E
D
E
P
A
R
T
.
0
7
3
1
1
5
-
D
E
V
0
8
/
1
0
/
1
5
0
1
M
A
Y
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
F
E
E
S
9
5
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
5
2
1
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
2
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
1
9
B
N
Y
M
G
L
O
B
T
H
E
B
A
N
K
O
F
N
E
W
Y
O
R
K
M
E
L
L
O
N
2
5
2
-
1
8
8
3
8
3
5
0
8
/
0
3
/
1
5
0
1
2
0
0
6
L
I
B
R
A
R
Y
B
O
N
D
A
D
M
I
N
F
E
E
8
2
-
8
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
8
5
8
8
.
5
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
8
8
.
5
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
8
8
.
5
0
5
2
0
3
2
0
B
S
N
S
P
O
R
T
B
S
N
/
P
A
S
S
O
N
'
S
/
G
S
C
/
C
O
N
L
I
N
S
P
O
R
T
S
9
7
0
8
8
6
0
0
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
S
O
F
T
B
A
L
L
S
,
S
C
O
R
E
B
O
O
K
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
2
7
0
.
1
1
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
7
0
.
1
1
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
7
0
.
1
1
Page 3 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
2
1
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
S
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
S
A
S
P
H
A
L
T
L
L
C
1
5
6
3
2
0
7
/
2
3
/
1
5
0
1
C
O
L
D
P
A
T
C
H
1
5
-
1
5
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
3
3
1
,
3
3
9
.
7
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
3
3
9
.
7
5
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
3
3
9
.
7
5
5
2
0
3
2
2
C
A
L
L
O
N
E
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
1
0
1
0
-
7
9
8
0
-
0
0
0
0
-
0
8
1
5
0
8
/
1
5
/
1
5
0
1
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
A
D
M
I
N
L
I
N
E
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
2
6
2
.
3
5
0
2
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
C
I
T
Y
H
A
L
L
N
O
R
T
E
L
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
3
7
.
4
7
0
3
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
C
I
T
Y
H
A
L
L
N
O
R
T
E
L
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
3
7
.
4
7
0
4
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
C
I
T
Y
H
A
L
L
N
O
R
T
E
L
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
3
7
.
4
7
0
5
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
P
O
L
I
C
E
L
I
N
E
S
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
7
0
5
.
1
1
0
6
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
C
I
T
Y
H
A
L
L
F
I
R
E
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
1
1
.
0
5
0
7
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
C
I
T
Y
H
A
L
L
F
I
R
E
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
1
1
.
0
5
0
8
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
L
I
B
R
A
R
Y
L
I
N
E
S
8
2
-
8
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
7
.
1
9
0
9
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
P
U
B
L
I
C
W
O
R
K
S
L
I
N
E
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
,
1
6
1
.
6
7
1
0
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
P
A
R
K
S
L
I
N
E
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
4
5
.
1
4
1
1
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
9
4
.
2
9
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
,
0
1
0
.
2
6
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
,
0
1
0
.
2
6
5
2
0
3
2
3
C
A
M
B
R
I
A
C
A
M
B
R
I
A
S
A
L
E
S
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
I
N
C
.
3
6
1
1
5
0
3
/
1
6
/
1
5
0
1
P
A
P
E
R
T
O
W
E
L
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
5
9
.
3
8
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
9
.
3
8
*
3
6
4
5
5
0
6
/
1
5
/
1
5
0
1
P
A
P
E
R
T
O
W
E
L
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
5
9
.
3
8
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
9
.
3
8
*
3
6
6
1
2
0
7
/
2
7
/
1
5
0
1
P
A
P
E
R
T
O
W
E
L
,
T
O
I
L
E
T
T
I
S
S
U
E
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
1
1
7
.
0
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
1
7
.
0
5
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
3
5
.
8
1
Page 4 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
2
4
C
A
P
E
R
S
C
A
P
E
R
S
L
L
C
I
N
V
-
0
0
5
5
0
8
/
0
3
/
1
5
0
1
0
8
/
1
4
/
1
5
-
0
8
/
1
3
/
1
6
A
N
N
U
A
L
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
7
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
2
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
2
5
C
A
R
G
I
L
L
C
A
R
G
I
L
L
,
I
N
C
2
9
0
2
3
4
0
9
1
3
0
6
/
1
8
/
1
5
0
1
B
U
L
K
R
O
C
K
S
A
L
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
3
8
2
,
9
4
8
.
7
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
,
9
4
8
.
7
7
*
2
9
0
2
3
9
5
5
0
3
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
B
U
L
K
R
O
C
K
S
A
L
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
3
8
2
,
9
7
9
.
0
2
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
,
9
7
9
.
0
2
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
,
9
2
7
.
7
9
5
2
0
3
2
6
C
I
N
T
A
S
F
P
C
I
N
T
A
S
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
2
F
9
4
0
0
1
1
4
9
3
8
0
7
/
2
7
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
1
-
0
9
/
3
0
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
A
T
6
1
0
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
5
1
9
5
.
0
0
0
2
T
O
W
E
R
L
A
N
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
9
5
.
0
0
*
F
9
4
0
0
1
1
4
9
3
9
0
7
/
2
7
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
1
-
0
9
/
3
0
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
A
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
5
1
9
5
.
0
0
0
2
2
3
4
4
T
R
E
M
O
N
T
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
9
5
.
0
0
*
F
9
4
0
0
1
1
4
9
4
0
0
7
/
2
7
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
1
-
0
9
/
3
0
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
A
T
3
2
9
9
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
5
1
9
5
.
0
0
0
2
L
E
H
M
A
N
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
9
5
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
8
5
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
2
7
C
O
L
L
E
P
R
O
C
O
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
P
R
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
S
I
N
C
.
2
1
4
8
3
0
-
J
-
0
7
3
1
1
5
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
O
N
C
O
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
1
0
.
8
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
.
8
6
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
.
8
6
Page 5 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
2
8
C
O
M
2
C
O
M
2
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
S
&
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
I
E
S
3
3
3
3
7
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
2
4
/
1
5
E
L
E
C
T
R
O
N
I
C
R
E
C
Y
C
L
I
N
G
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
7
5
.
0
0
0
2
P
I
C
K
-
U
P
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
5
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
5
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
2
9
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
0
1
8
5
0
7
9
1
0
9
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
1
-
0
7
/
3
1
4
2
0
F
A
I
R
H
A
V
E
N
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
1
3
3
.
3
9
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
3
3
.
3
9
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
3
3
.
3
9
5
2
0
3
3
0
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
0
4
3
5
1
1
3
1
1
6
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
5
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
6
-
0
8
/
0
4
B
E
E
C
H
E
R
R
D
L
I
G
H
T
1
5
-
1
5
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
2
5
2
.
7
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
2
.
7
4
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
2
.
7
4
5
2
0
3
3
1
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
0
6
6
3
1
1
2
2
3
0
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
0
1
0
3
1
/
2
B
E
A
V
E
R
S
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
4
0
.
3
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
0
.
3
7
*
0
9
0
3
0
4
0
0
7
7
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
1
2
-
0
7
/
2
9
M
I
S
C
S
T
R
E
E
T
L
I
G
H
T
S
1
5
-
1
5
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
2
2
,
4
1
1
.
8
9
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
,
4
1
1
.
8
9
*
0
9
0
8
0
1
4
0
0
4
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
3
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
2
-
0
8
/
0
3
6
7
8
0
R
T
4
7
W
E
L
L
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
3
8
.
3
9
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
8
.
3
9
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
,
4
9
0
.
6
5
5
2
0
3
3
2
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
Page 6 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
3
2
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
0
9
6
6
0
3
8
0
7
7
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
2
9
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
9
4
5
6
K
E
N
N
E
D
Y
R
D
1
5
-
1
5
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
2
4
3
.
1
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
3
.
1
4
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
3
.
1
4
5
2
0
3
3
3
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
1
1
8
3
0
8
8
1
0
1
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
2
8
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
1
1
0
7
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
1
0
9
.
0
7
0
2
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
9
.
0
7
*
1
4
0
7
1
2
5
0
4
5
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
6
-
0
8
/
0
4
F
O
X
H
I
L
L
L
I
F
T
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
7
4
.
8
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
4
.
8
7
*
1
7
1
8
0
9
9
0
5
2
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
2
8
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
8
7
2
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
2
0
2
.
4
0
0
2
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
2
.
4
0
*
2
0
1
9
0
9
9
0
4
4
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
6
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
1
7
-
0
7
/
1
7
4
6
0
0
B
R
I
D
G
E
W
E
L
L
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
6
1
.
2
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
1
.
2
7
*
2
6
6
8
0
4
7
0
0
7
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
2
8
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
2
6
-
0
7
/
2
8
1
9
0
8
R
A
I
N
T
R
E
E
R
D
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
8
0
.
8
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
0
.
8
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
2
8
.
4
1
5
2
0
3
3
4
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
2
9
4
7
0
5
2
0
3
1
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
1
-
0
7
/
3
0
R
I
V
E
R
S
T
R
E
E
T
1
5
-
1
5
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
2
1
4
3
.
7
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
4
3
.
7
7
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
4
3
.
7
7
5
2
0
3
3
5
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
Page 7 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
3
5
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
2
9
6
1
0
1
7
0
4
3
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
0
P
R
E
S
T
W
I
C
K
L
I
F
T
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
1
0
4
.
7
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
4
.
7
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
4
.
7
0
5
2
0
3
3
6
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
3
1
1
9
1
4
2
0
2
5
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
0
V
A
N
E
M
M
O
N
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
1
5
-
1
5
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
2
1
4
.
0
4
0
2
L
O
T
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
4
.
0
4
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
4
.
0
4
5
2
0
3
3
7
C
O
M
E
D
C
O
M
M
O
N
W
E
A
L
T
H
E
D
I
S
O
N
4
0
8
5
0
8
0
0
3
3
-
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
1
9
9
1
C
A
N
N
O
N
B
A
L
L
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
1
5
6
.
6
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
6
.
6
6
*
4
4
4
9
0
8
7
0
1
6
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
6
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
1
-
0
7
/
3
1
M
I
S
C
L
I
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
6
9
7
.
1
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
9
7
.
1
7
*
4
4
7
5
0
9
3
0
5
3
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
3
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
2
-
0
8
/
0
3
6
1
0
T
O
W
E
R
L
A
N
E
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
1
7
7
.
4
2
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
7
7
.
4
2
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
0
3
1
.
2
5
5
2
0
3
3
8
C
O
N
S
T
E
L
L
C
O
N
S
T
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
N
E
W
E
N
E
R
G
Y
0
0
2
6
3
5
2
5
5
4
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
8
2
9
2
1
B
R
I
S
T
O
L
R
I
D
G
E
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
3
,
6
2
6
.
1
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
,
6
2
6
.
1
0
*
0
0
2
6
3
9
1
6
0
9
0
8
/
0
1
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
1
-
0
7
/
2
9
2
2
2
4
T
R
E
M
O
N
T
S
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
4
,
1
9
0
.
8
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
,
1
9
0
.
8
7
*
0
0
2
6
4
7
9
7
3
6
0
8
/
0
5
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
2
-
0
8
/
0
2
6
1
0
T
O
W
E
R
L
A
N
E
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
6
,
8
0
1
.
5
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
,
8
0
1
.
5
0
*
Page 8 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
3
8
C
O
N
S
T
E
L
L
C
O
N
S
T
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
N
E
W
E
N
E
R
G
Y
0
0
2
6
4
7
9
8
6
0
0
8
/
0
5
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
2
-
0
8
/
0
2
1
W
A
L
L
E
Y
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
8
8
2
.
6
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
8
2
.
6
6
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
,
5
0
1
.
1
3
5
2
0
3
3
9
D
E
K
A
N
E
D
E
K
A
N
E
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
C
O
R
P
.
I
A
3
7
9
2
6
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
A
S
S
Y
C
O
U
P
L
E
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
4
0
8
8
.
1
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
8
.
1
6
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
8
.
1
6
5
2
0
3
4
0
D
U
T
E
K
T
H
O
M
A
S
&
J
U
L
I
E
F
L
E
T
C
H
E
R
3
4
7
7
6
1
0
8
/
0
3
/
1
5
0
1
H
O
S
E
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
8
8
9
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
9
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
9
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
4
1
D
Y
N
E
G
Y
D
Y
N
E
G
Y
E
N
E
R
G
Y
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
S
1
0
2
3
6
8
9
4
1
5
0
8
1
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
1
-
0
7
/
3
0
1
C
O
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
P
K
W
Y
1
5
-
1
5
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
2
1
2
0
.
7
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
2
0
.
7
4
*
1
0
2
3
8
9
4
1
5
0
8
1
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
1
-
0
7
/
3
0
1
C
O
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
P
K
W
Y
1
5
-
1
5
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
2
1
2
0
.
7
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
2
0
.
7
4
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
4
1
.
4
8
5
2
0
3
4
2
F
A
R
R
E
N
F
A
R
R
E
N
H
E
A
T
I
N
G
&
C
O
O
L
I
N
G
9
1
4
3
0
7
/
2
7
/
1
5
0
1
W
A
S
H
E
D
C
O
N
D
E
N
S
O
R
S
&
T
E
S
T
E
D
2
3
-
2
1
6
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
6
7
3
3
.
9
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
3
3
.
9
4
*
9
1
4
9
0
7
/
2
8
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
A
N
D
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
C
S
H
A
F
T
&
2
3
-
2
1
6
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
6
1
,
8
9
4
.
0
3
Page 9 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
4
2
F
A
R
R
E
N
F
A
R
R
E
N
H
E
A
T
I
N
G
&
C
O
O
L
I
N
G
9
1
4
9
0
7
/
2
8
/
1
5
0
2
B
E
A
R
I
N
G
S
O
N
C
O
N
D
E
N
S
E
R
F
A
N
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
8
9
4
.
0
3
*
9
1
5
5
0
7
/
2
9
/
1
5
0
1
C
A
U
L
K
E
D
B
E
T
W
E
E
N
E
V
A
P
O
R
A
T
O
R
2
3
-
2
1
6
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
6
1
2
0
.
0
0
0
2
C
O
I
L
&
F
U
R
N
A
C
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
2
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
,
7
4
7
.
9
7
5
2
0
3
4
3
G
A
R
D
K
O
C
H
G
A
R
D
I
N
E
R
K
O
C
H
&
W
E
I
S
B
E
R
G
H
-
2
3
6
4
C
-
1
1
0
9
9
9
0
8
/
0
2
/
1
5
0
1
K
I
M
B
A
L
L
H
I
L
L
L
E
G
A
L
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
1
4
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
0
.
0
0
*
H
-
3
0
5
5
C
-
1
1
0
9
9
7
0
8
/
0
2
/
1
5
0
1
I
C
C
I
L
E
G
A
L
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
1
8
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
0
.
0
0
*
H
-
3
1
8
1
C
-
1
1
0
9
9
6
0
8
/
0
2
/
1
5
0
1
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
I
T
Y
L
E
G
A
L
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
1
6
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
0
.
0
0
*
H
-
3
5
2
5
C
-
1
1
0
9
9
8
0
8
/
0
2
/
1
5
0
1
K
I
M
B
A
L
L
H
I
L
L
U
N
I
T
4
L
E
G
A
L
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
1
8
0
2
.
8
0
0
2
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
0
2
.
8
0
*
H
-
3
5
4
8
C
-
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
8
/
0
2
/
1
5
0
1
W
A
L
K
E
R
H
O
M
E
S
L
E
G
A
L
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
1
2
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
,
8
8
2
.
8
0
5
2
0
3
4
4
G
R
A
N
D
R
E
N
G
R
A
N
D
R
E
N
T
A
L
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
1
9
8
7
2
0
8
/
1
2
/
1
5
0
1
T
A
B
L
E
A
N
D
C
H
A
I
R
R
E
N
T
A
L
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
2
9
4
8
.
8
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
9
4
8
.
8
6
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
9
4
8
.
8
6
Page 10 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
4
5
G
R
O
U
N
D
G
R
O
U
N
D
E
F
F
E
C
T
S
I
N
C
.
3
2
1
8
5
4
0
7
/
1
3
/
1
5
0
1
F
A
B
R
I
C
P
I
N
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
3
1
.
1
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
1
.
1
5
*
3
2
3
2
1
5
0
7
/
2
7
/
1
5
0
1
D
I
R
T
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
2
6
7
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
6
7
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
9
8
.
1
5
5
2
0
3
4
6
H
A
R
R
I
S
H
A
R
R
I
S
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
X
T
0
0
0
0
5
0
7
6
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
C
U
S
T
O
M
S
E
C
O
N
D
N
O
T
I
C
E
B
I
L
L
D
A
T
A
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
3
0
0
.
0
0
0
2
S
E
T
U
P
&
R
E
V
I
E
W
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
0
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
0
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
4
7
H
U
N
G
E
R
A
A
L
A
N
H
U
N
G
E
R
0
7
3
0
1
5
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
U
M
P
I
R
E
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
5
7
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
7
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
7
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
4
8
I
L
E
A
S
I
L
E
A
S
D
U
E
S
4
9
3
3
0
7
/
0
1
/
1
5
0
1
I
L
E
A
S
2
0
1
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
M
E
M
B
E
R
S
H
I
P
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
0
1
2
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
2
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
2
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
4
9
I
L
P
D
4
7
7
8
I
L
L
I
N
O
I
S
S
T
A
T
E
P
O
L
I
C
E
0
8
1
1
1
5
0
8
/
1
1
/
1
5
0
1
L
I
Q
U
O
R
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
B
A
C
K
G
R
O
U
N
D
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
2
9
.
7
5
0
2
C
H
E
C
K
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
9
.
7
5
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
9
.
7
5
Page 11 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
5
0
I
L
P
D
4
8
1
1
I
L
L
I
N
O
I
S
S
T
A
T
E
P
O
L
I
C
E
0
8
1
1
1
5
0
8
/
1
1
/
1
5
0
1
B
A
C
K
G
R
O
U
N
D
C
H
E
C
K
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
4
1
6
.
5
0
0
2
B
A
C
K
G
R
O
U
N
D
C
H
E
C
K
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
2
9
.
7
5
0
3
B
A
C
K
G
R
O
U
N
D
C
H
E
C
K
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
2
9
.
7
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
7
6
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
7
6
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
5
1
I
L
T
R
U
C
K
I
L
L
I
N
O
I
S
T
R
U
C
K
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
,
I
N
0
2
7
1
9
1
0
7
/
2
7
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
B
R
E
A
K
E
R
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
7
6
.
4
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
6
.
4
4
*
4
9
6
3
6
0
7
/
2
7
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
R
E
A
R
D
R
I
V
E
A
X
E
L
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
3
0
7
.
7
8
0
2
S
H
O
C
K
S
&
R
E
P
A
I
R
E
D
A
I
R
L
E
A
K
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
0
7
.
7
8
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
8
4
.
2
2
5
2
0
3
5
2
I
M
P
E
R
I
N
V
I
M
P
E
R
I
A
L
I
N
V
E
S
T
M
E
N
T
S
J
U
N
E
2
0
1
5
-
R
E
B
A
T
E
0
8
/
1
0
/
1
5
0
1
J
U
N
E
2
0
1
5
D
O
W
N
T
O
W
N
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
0
1
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
8
8
2
1
6
.
8
8
0
2
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
T
A
X
R
E
B
A
T
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
1
6
.
8
8
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
1
6
.
8
8
5
2
0
3
5
3
I
N
F
I
N
I
T
Y
I
N
F
I
N
I
T
Y
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
I
E
S
7
1
0
9
9
0
7
/
2
2
/
1
5
0
1
4
8
P
O
R
T
C
A
T
P
A
T
C
H
P
A
N
E
L
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
5
0
1
4
5
.
8
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
4
5
.
8
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
4
5
.
8
0
5
2
0
3
5
4
I
N
G
E
M
U
N
S
I
N
G
E
M
U
N
S
O
N
L
A
W
O
F
F
I
C
E
S
L
T
D
Page 12 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
5
4
I
N
G
E
M
U
N
S
I
N
G
E
M
U
N
S
O
N
L
A
W
O
F
F
I
C
E
S
L
T
D
1
9
5
2
0
7
/
0
1
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
1
5
A
D
M
I
N
H
E
A
R
I
N
G
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
7
1
5
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
5
5
J
O
H
N
S
O
I
L
J
O
H
N
S
O
N
O
I
L
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
I
L
7
5
0
8
5
0
0
8
/
0
1
/
1
5
0
1
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
G
A
S
O
L
I
N
E
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
7
7
.
2
8
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
7
.
2
8
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
7
.
2
8
5
2
0
3
5
6
J
S
H
O
E
S
J
E
F
F
R
E
Y
L
.
J
E
R
A
B
E
K
6
5
9
2
-
2
4
0
7
/
2
1
/
1
5
0
1
S
T
E
E
L
T
O
E
B
O
O
T
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
2
0
7
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
7
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
7
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
5
7
K
E
N
D
C
R
O
S
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
,
L
L
C
A
M
U
R
E
B
A
T
E
-
0
7
/
1
5
0
8
/
1
5
/
1
5
0
1
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
N
C
G
A
M
U
S
E
M
E
N
T
T
A
X
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
3
9
6
,
1
9
1
.
3
3
0
2
R
E
B
A
T
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
,
1
9
1
.
3
3
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
,
1
9
1
.
3
3
5
2
0
3
5
8
K
E
N
D
C
R
O
S
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
,
L
L
C
B
D
R
E
B
A
T
E
-
0
6
1
5
0
8
/
1
0
/
1
5
0
1
N
C
G
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
D
I
S
T
R
E
B
A
T
E
F
O
R
0
1
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
8
7
1
,
0
1
8
.
9
8
0
2
J
U
N
E
2
0
1
5
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
0
1
8
.
9
8
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
0
1
8
.
9
8
Page 13 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
5
9
M
C
K
I
R
G
N
R
A
N
D
Y
M
C
K
I
R
G
A
N
7
9
6
2
7
0
7
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
B
I
O
-
D
I
E
S
E
L
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
6
5
4
.
6
4
0
2
B
I
O
-
D
I
E
S
E
L
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
6
5
4
.
6
4
0
3
B
I
O
-
D
I
E
S
E
L
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
6
5
4
.
6
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
9
6
3
.
9
2
*
7
9
7
2
4
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
B
I
O
-
D
I
E
S
E
L
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
6
4
9
.
0
2
0
2
B
I
O
-
D
I
E
S
E
L
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
6
4
9
.
0
2
0
3
B
I
O
-
D
I
E
S
E
L
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
6
4
9
.
0
2
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
9
4
7
.
0
6
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
,
9
1
0
.
9
8
5
2
0
3
6
0
M
C
O
F
F
I
C
E
M
C
G
R
A
T
H
O
F
F
I
C
E
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
,
I
N
C
.
1
2
8
4
3
0
8
/
0
1
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
L
E
A
S
E
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
5
1
9
5
.
5
6
0
2
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
L
E
A
S
E
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
5
1
5
6
.
4
4
0
3
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
L
E
A
S
E
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
5
2
8
9
.
0
0
0
4
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
L
E
A
S
E
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
5
4
5
7
.
0
0
0
5
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
L
E
A
S
E
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
5
4
2
.
0
0
0
6
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
L
E
A
S
E
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
5
4
2
.
0
0
0
7
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
L
E
A
S
E
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
5
4
2
.
0
0
0
8
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
L
E
A
S
E
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
5
4
2
.
0
0
0
9
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
L
E
A
S
E
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
5
2
7
4
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
5
4
0
.
0
0
*
1
2
8
4
4
0
8
/
0
1
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
3
0
1
7
7
.
8
8
0
2
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
3
0
5
9
.
2
9
0
3
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
3
0
1
1
2
.
7
8
0
4
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
3
0
1
0
8
.
5
3
0
5
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
3
0
1
.
9
9
0
6
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
3
0
1
.
9
8
0
7
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
1
.
3
2
0
8
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
3
1
C
O
P
I
E
R
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
2
0
9
.
5
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
7
3
.
3
2
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
,
2
1
3
.
3
2
Page 14 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
6
1
M
E
A
D
O
W
B
R
M
E
A
D
O
W
B
R
O
O
K
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
S
L
L
C
0
8
0
4
1
5
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
8
4
5
&
8
3
5
C
A
R
L
Y
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
0
1
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
1
5
6
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
0
2
G
U
A
R
A
N
T
E
E
R
E
F
U
N
D
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
6
2
M
E
A
D
O
W
B
R
M
E
A
D
O
W
B
R
O
O
K
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
S
L
L
C
0
8
0
7
1
5
-
2
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
8
0
5
&
9
5
1
C
A
R
L
Y
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
0
1
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
1
5
1
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
0
2
G
U
A
R
A
N
T
E
E
R
E
F
U
N
D
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
2
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
6
3
M
E
N
L
A
N
D
M
E
N
A
R
D
S
-
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
1
6
5
6
6
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
5
0
1
T
A
N
K
L
E
S
S
W
A
T
E
R
H
E
A
T
E
R
F
O
R
Y
A
K
8
8
-
8
8
0
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
0
0
1
7
9
.
0
0
0
2
S
H
A
K
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
7
9
.
0
0
*
1
6
6
5
1
0
7
/
1
7
/
1
5
0
1
H
O
M
E
L
I
N
E
L
U
G
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
8
.
9
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
.
9
6
*
1
7
0
4
6
0
7
/
2
1
/
1
5
0
1
D
E
W
A
T
E
R
I
N
G
G
A
S
P
U
M
P
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
4
0
2
4
9
.
9
9
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
4
9
.
9
9
*
1
7
2
6
6
0
7
/
2
3
/
1
5
0
1
M
A
L
E
H
O
S
E
A
D
A
P
T
O
R
,
O
I
L
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
7
.
0
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
.
0
6
*
1
7
4
2
8
0
7
/
2
5
/
1
5
0
1
R
O
P
E
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
1
7
.
9
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
7
.
9
7
*
1
7
6
1
1
0
7
/
2
7
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G
R
I
N
G
S
,
R
E
E
L
S
T
A
N
D
,
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
1
4
.
4
4
0
2
M
A
S
O
N
L
I
N
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
4
.
4
4
*
Page 15 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
6
3
M
E
N
L
A
N
D
M
E
N
A
R
D
S
-
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
1
7
7
2
9
0
7
/
2
8
/
1
5
0
1
F
I
L
T
E
R
,
F
L
O
O
R
N
O
Z
Z
L
E
,
C
R
E
V
I
C
E
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
3
8
4
0
.
1
0
0
2
T
O
O
L
.
,
B
U
L
B
S
,
T
O
I
L
E
T
C
L
E
A
N
E
R
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
0
.
1
0
*
1
7
8
0
8
0
7
/
2
9
/
1
5
0
1
B
U
L
B
2
3
-
2
1
6
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
5
6
2
.
9
8
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
.
9
8
*
1
7
9
1
4
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
S
T
R
A
I
N
E
R
,
W
I
P
E
R
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
1
5
.
9
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
.
9
6
*
1
7
9
2
2
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
S
E
A
L
B
E
S
T
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
6
8
9
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
8
9
.
0
0
*
1
7
9
2
4
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
M
E
N
D
I
N
G
P
L
A
T
E
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
6
.
6
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
6
.
6
0
*
1
8
0
1
3
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
R
O
U
N
D
U
P
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
2
6
.
9
9
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
6
.
9
9
*
1
8
0
1
4
-
1
5
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
C
O
A
X
,
D
U
P
L
E
X
C
O
V
E
R
,
P
O
L
E
2
3
-
2
1
6
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
5
6
3
1
.
6
4
0
2
B
R
E
A
K
E
R
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
1
.
6
4
*
1
8
0
1
7
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
F
L
O
O
R
S
Q
U
E
E
G
E
E
,
D
R
I
V
E
W
A
Y
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
1
,
4
6
7
.
9
6
0
2
S
E
A
L
B
E
S
T
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
4
6
7
.
9
6
*
1
8
3
0
4
0
8
/
0
3
/
1
5
0
1
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
L
O
C
K
S
E
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
3
8
8
0
.
9
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
0
.
9
7
*
1
8
3
6
2
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
S
T
A
P
L
E
S
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
1
0
.
2
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
.
2
5
*
1
8
3
6
4
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
D
U
R
A
Z
O
N
E
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
7
0
.
4
1
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
0
.
4
1
*
Page 16 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
6
3
M
E
N
L
A
N
D
M
E
N
A
R
D
S
-
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
1
8
3
7
1
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
B
R
U
S
H
,
W
O
O
D
H
A
N
D
L
E
,
S
T
E
E
L
W
O
O
L
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
4
0
2
6
7
.
9
2
0
2
P
A
I
N
T
,
D
U
C
K
T
A
P
E
,
R
O
L
L
E
R
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
6
7
.
9
2
*
1
8
4
7
4
0
8
/
0
5
/
1
5
0
1
D
U
R
A
Z
O
N
E
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
4
6
.
9
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
6
.
9
4
*
1
8
5
1
4
0
8
/
0
5
/
1
5
0
1
W
A
S
P
&
H
O
R
N
E
T
K
I
L
L
E
R
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
2
4
.
4
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
4
.
4
0
*
1
8
6
4
9
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
G
O
R
I
L
L
A
T
A
P
E
,
G
A
P
F
I
L
L
E
R
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
4
4
.
3
3
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
4
.
3
3
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
,
3
0
3
.
8
7
5
2
0
3
6
4
M
E
R
R
I
M
A
K
K
R
I
S
T
E
N
M
E
R
R
I
M
A
N
0
7
3
0
1
5
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
U
M
P
I
R
E
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
5
7
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
7
.
0
0
*
0
8
0
4
1
5
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
U
M
P
I
R
E
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
5
2
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
2
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
9
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
6
5
M
E
T
R
O
M
A
Y
M
E
T
R
O
P
O
L
I
T
A
N
M
A
Y
O
R
'
S
C
A
U
C
U
S
2
0
1
5
-
2
8
4
0
6
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
1
5
C
A
U
C
U
S
D
U
E
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
0
7
6
1
.
4
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
6
1
.
4
5
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
6
1
.
4
5
5
2
0
3
6
6
M
O
H
M
S
M
I
D
W
E
S
T
O
C
C
U
P
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
H
E
A
L
T
H
M
S
2
0
5
5
5
5
0
8
/
0
6
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
A
S
O
N
A
B
L
E
S
U
S
P
I
C
I
O
N
T
E
S
T
I
N
G
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
1
2
9
0
.
0
0
Page 17 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
6
6
M
O
H
M
S
M
I
D
W
E
S
T
O
C
C
U
P
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
H
E
A
L
T
H
M
S
2
0
5
5
5
5
0
8
/
0
6
/
1
5
0
2
F
O
R
1
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
9
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
9
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
6
7
M
U
N
C
L
R
K
M
U
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
C
L
E
R
K
S
O
F
I
L
L
I
N
O
I
S
0
8
0
6
1
5
0
8
/
0
6
/
1
5
0
1
A
N
N
U
A
L
M
E
M
B
E
R
S
H
I
P
D
U
E
S
F
O
R
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
0
9
0
.
0
0
0
2
C
I
T
Y
C
L
E
R
K
&
D
E
P
U
T
Y
C
L
E
R
K
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
9
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
9
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
6
8
N
A
R
V
I
C
K
N
A
R
V
I
C
K
B
R
O
S
.
L
U
M
B
E
R
C
O
,
I
N
C
4
9
3
1
3
0
7
/
2
8
/
1
5
0
1
4
0
0
0
P
S
I
2
3
-
2
3
0
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
4
1
4
9
8
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
9
8
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
9
8
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
6
9
N
C
I
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
C
O
L
L
E
C
T
O
R
S
I
N
C
0
8
0
2
4
8
0
7
/
2
8
/
1
5
0
1
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
O
N
C
O
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
1
6
1
.
8
9
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
6
1
.
8
9
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
6
1
.
8
9
5
2
0
3
7
0
N
E
O
P
O
S
T
N
E
O
F
U
N
D
S
B
Y
N
E
O
P
O
S
T
0
8
1
8
1
5
0
8
/
1
8
/
1
5
0
1
P
O
S
T
A
G
E
M
E
T
E
R
R
E
F
I
L
L
0
1
-
0
0
0
-
1
4
-
0
0
-
1
4
1
0
5
0
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
0
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
0
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
7
1
N
I
C
O
R
N
I
C
O
R
G
A
S
Page 18 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
7
1
N
I
C
O
R
N
I
C
O
R
G
A
S
0
0
-
4
1
-
2
2
-
8
7
4
8
4
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
0
8
-
0
8
/
0
6
1
1
0
7
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
L
A
N
E
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
2
0
.
0
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
.
0
6
*
1
5
-
4
1
-
5
0
-
1
0
0
0
6
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
0
6
/
0
9
-
0
8
/
0
6
8
0
4
G
A
M
E
F
A
R
M
R
D
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
1
0
.
8
3
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
.
8
3
*
1
5
-
6
3
-
7
4
-
5
7
3
3
2
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
2
-
0
8
/
0
3
1
9
5
5
B
R
I
D
G
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
3
0
.
4
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
0
.
4
4
*
1
5
-
6
4
-
6
1
-
3
5
3
2
5
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
6
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
8
-
0
8
/
0
6
1
9
9
1
C
A
N
N
O
N
B
A
L
L
T
R
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
3
3
.
0
3
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
3
.
0
3
*
2
3
-
4
5
-
9
1
-
4
8
6
2
5
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
6
-
0
8
/
0
4
1
0
1
B
R
U
E
L
L
S
T
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
8
2
.
0
2
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
2
.
0
2
*
3
1
-
6
1
-
6
7
-
2
4
9
3
1
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
8
-
0
8
/
0
6
2
7
6
W
I
N
D
H
A
M
C
I
R
C
L
E
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
2
5
.
6
1
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
5
.
6
1
*
4
6
-
6
9
-
4
7
-
6
7
2
7
1
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
8
-
0
8
/
0
7
1
9
7
5
B
R
I
D
G
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
8
1
.
4
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
1
.
4
5
*
4
9
-
2
5
-
6
1
-
1
0
0
0
5
-
0
7
1
5
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
2
-
0
8
/
0
3
1
V
A
N
E
M
M
O
N
R
D
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
8
0
4
4
.
1
2
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
4
.
1
2
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
2
7
.
5
6
5
2
0
3
7
2
O
R
R
K
K
A
T
H
L
E
E
N
F
I
E
L
D
O
R
R
&
A
S
S
O
C
.
1
4
7
4
1
0
8
/
0
8
/
1
5
0
1
M
I
S
C
C
I
T
Y
L
E
G
A
L
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
5
6
3
,
7
8
9
.
5
0
0
2
L
O
T
1
9
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
D
R
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
9
0
-
0
8
2
-
8
2
-
0
0
-
0
0
1
1
8
1
9
.
0
0
0
3
C
O
M
M
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
L
E
G
A
L
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
6
5
9
8
.
0
0
0
4
F
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
V
I
E
W
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
9
0
-
0
8
3
-
8
3
-
0
0
-
0
0
1
1
7
9
9
.
5
0
0
5
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
P
L
A
C
E
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
5
6
3
9
.
0
0
0
6
M
E
E
T
I
N
G
S
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
5
6
6
9
5
.
0
0
Page 19 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
7
2
O
R
R
K
K
A
T
H
L
E
E
N
F
I
E
L
D
O
R
R
&
A
S
S
O
C
.
1
4
7
4
1
0
8
/
0
8
/
1
5
0
7
P
A
R
K
S
L
E
G
A
L
M
A
T
T
E
R
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
6
1
,
5
2
6
.
2
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
,
2
6
6
.
2
5
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
,
2
6
6
.
2
5
5
2
0
3
7
3
P
A
R
A
D
I
S
E
P
A
R
A
D
I
S
E
C
A
R
W
A
S
H
2
2
3
0
4
4
0
8
/
0
2
/
1
5
0
1
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
C
A
R
W
A
S
H
E
S
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
2
8
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
8
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
8
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
7
4
R
0
0
0
1
5
0
2
S
T
E
V
E
N
S
C
O
T
T
0
8
0
6
1
5
0
8
/
0
6
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
F
U
N
D
F
I
N
A
L
B
I
L
L
O
V
E
R
P
A
Y
M
E
N
T
0
1
-
0
0
0
-
1
3
-
0
0
-
1
3
7
1
1
5
1
.
7
1
0
2
O
N
A
C
C
#
0
1
0
1
0
8
1
0
0
0
-
0
9
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
1
.
7
1
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
1
.
7
1
5
2
0
3
7
5
R
0
0
0
1
5
0
3
B
R
E
N
D
E
N
H
E
F
F
E
R
N
A
N
0
7
3
1
1
5
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
F
I
N
A
L
B
I
L
L
O
V
E
R
P
A
Y
M
E
N
T
R
E
F
U
N
D
0
1
-
0
0
0
-
1
3
-
0
0
-
1
3
7
1
2
3
0
.
3
0
0
2
O
N
A
C
C
T
#
0
1
0
2
7
1
4
8
0
0
-
0
0
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
3
0
.
3
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
3
0
.
3
0
5
2
0
3
7
6
R
0
0
0
1
5
0
4
M
I
K
E
P
E
U
R
A
0
8
0
5
1
5
0
8
/
0
5
/
1
5
0
1
U
S
S
S
A
T
E
A
M
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
2
F
O
R
F
A
L
L
S
O
F
T
B
A
L
L
T
E
A
M
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
0
.
0
0
Page 20 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
7
7
R
0
0
0
1
5
0
5
J
E
N
N
I
F
E
R
W
A
L
K
E
R
1
5
0
8
3
4
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
P
R
E
S
C
H
O
L
L
C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
R
E
F
U
N
D
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
6
7
5
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
5
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
5
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
7
8
R
0
0
0
1
5
0
6
J
E
N
N
I
F
E
R
W
A
R
N
E
R
1
5
0
8
1
2
0
8
/
0
3
/
1
5
0
1
C
L
A
S
S
C
A
N
C
E
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
R
E
F
U
N
D
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
6
8
2
.
5
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
2
.
5
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
2
.
5
0
5
2
0
3
7
9
R
0
0
0
1
5
0
7
C
H
R
I
S
S
P
R
I
N
G
B
O
R
N
0
8
1
2
1
5
0
8
/
1
2
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
F
U
N
D
O
V
E
R
P
A
Y
M
E
N
T
O
N
U
B
0
1
-
0
0
0
-
1
3
-
0
0
-
1
3
7
1
2
2
0
.
1
2
0
2
A
C
C
T
#
0
1
0
7
6
0
3
4
7
0
-
0
1
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
2
0
.
1
2
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
2
0
.
1
2
5
2
0
3
8
0
R
E
I
N
D
E
R
S
R
E
I
N
D
E
R
S
,
I
N
C
.
1
5
9
4
8
3
7
-
0
0
A
0
7
/
1
6
/
1
5
0
1
V
-
B
E
L
T
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
4
0
1
7
.
7
2
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
7
.
7
2
*
1
5
9
5
9
0
3
-
0
0
0
7
/
2
2
/
1
5
0
1
P
U
L
L
E
Y
,
C
A
P
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
4
0
1
4
5
.
8
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
4
5
.
8
7
*
1
5
9
6
1
8
1
-
0
0
0
7
/
2
3
/
1
5
0
1
W
A
S
H
E
R
S
,
S
C
R
E
W
S
,
P
U
L
L
E
Y
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
4
0
7
9
.
7
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
9
.
7
7
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
4
3
.
3
6
5
2
0
3
8
1
S
E
N
G
M
S
E
N
G
,
M
A
T
T
Page 21 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
8
1
S
E
N
G
M
S
E
N
G
,
M
A
T
T
0
6
1
5
1
5
-
2
0
8
/
1
2
/
1
5
0
1
I
M
S
A
M
E
A
L
R
E
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
1
2
1
5
.
8
3
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
.
8
3
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
.
8
3
5
2
0
3
8
2
S
K
Y
H
A
W
K
S
S
K
Y
H
A
W
K
S
S
P
O
R
T
S
A
C
A
D
E
M
Y
,
I
N
C
4
0
1
0
8
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
1
3
-
0
7
/
1
7
B
A
S
K
E
T
B
A
L
L
C
A
M
P
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
5
4
7
.
4
0
0
2
I
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
4
7
.
4
0
*
4
0
1
0
9
0
8
/
1
0
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
2
0
-
0
7
/
2
4
T
E
N
N
I
S
C
A
M
P
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
9
4
9
.
0
0
0
2
I
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
9
4
9
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
4
9
6
.
4
0
5
2
0
3
8
3
S
P
E
E
D
W
A
Y
S
P
E
E
D
W
A
Y
1
0
0
1
5
4
2
4
3
8
-
0
8
1
5
0
8
/
1
2
/
1
5
0
1
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
G
A
S
O
L
I
N
E
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
1
,
4
1
7
.
8
5
0
2
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
G
A
S
O
L
I
N
E
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
4
4
.
2
0
0
3
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
G
A
S
O
L
I
N
E
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
4
,
9
0
6
.
2
2
0
4
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
G
A
S
O
L
I
N
E
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
5
5
8
.
1
7
0
5
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
G
A
S
O
L
I
N
E
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
5
5
8
.
1
7
0
6
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
G
A
S
O
L
I
N
E
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
5
5
8
.
1
7
0
7
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
G
A
S
O
L
I
N
E
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
9
5
1
1
9
.
6
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
,
1
6
2
.
4
2
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
,
1
6
2
.
4
2
5
2
0
3
8
4
S
T
E
V
E
N
S
S
T
E
V
E
N
'
S
S
I
L
K
S
C
R
E
E
N
I
N
G
9
0
8
7
0
8
/
0
5
/
1
5
0
1
S
H
I
R
T
E
M
B
R
O
I
D
E
R
Y
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
8
8
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
8
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
8
.
0
0
Page 22 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
8
5
S
T
R
Y
P
E
S
S
T
R
Y
P
E
S
P
L
U
S
M
O
R
E
I
N
C
.
1
3
0
0
4
0
8
/
1
0
/
1
5
0
1
N
E
W
S
Q
U
A
D
D
E
T
A
I
L
I
N
G
2
5
-
2
0
5
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
7
0
1
,
9
8
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
9
8
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
9
8
0
.
0
0
5
2
0
3
8
6
T
I
G
E
R
D
I
R
T
I
G
E
R
D
I
R
E
C
T
L
6
9
4
2
5
7
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
/
1
4
/
1
5
0
1
W
I
D
E
S
C
R
E
E
N
L
E
D
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
3
5
1
1
1
.
5
4
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
1
1
.
5
4
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
1
1
.
5
4
5
2
0
3
8
7
V
I
T
O
S
H
C
H
R
I
S
T
I
N
E
M
.
V
I
T
O
S
H
C
M
V
1
7
2
1
0
8
/
0
3
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
Z
O
N
I
N
G
&
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
U
S
E
P
U
B
L
I
C
9
0
-
0
8
2
-
8
2
-
0
0
-
0
0
1
1
2
0
7
.
8
6
0
2
H
E
A
R
I
N
G
F
O
R
1
4
7
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
7
.
8
6
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
7
.
8
6
5
2
0
3
8
8
W
E
L
D
S
T
A
R
W
E
L
D
S
T
A
R
0
1
4
8
1
2
9
1
0
7
/
2
4
/
1
5
0
1
G
A
S
S
T
E
E
L
C
Y
L
Y
N
D
E
R
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
7
.
5
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
.
5
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
.
5
0
5
2
0
3
8
9
W
T
R
P
R
D
W
A
T
E
R
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
,
I
N
C
.
0
2
5
9
5
5
8
0
7
/
3
0
/
1
5
0
1
H
Y
D
R
A
N
T
W
R
E
N
C
H
E
S
,
I
R
O
N
P
I
P
E
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
4
0
4
9
8
.
9
0
0
2
T
H
R
E
A
D
,
G
A
R
D
E
N
H
O
S
E
,
C
O
P
P
E
R
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
3
T
U
B
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
9
8
.
9
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
9
8
.
9
0
Page 23 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
9
0
Y
B
S
D
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
B
R
I
S
T
O
L
0
5
5
1
-
0
1
1
7
9
2
8
6
7
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
&
T
I
P
P
I
N
G
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
5
8
,
8
9
9
.
1
0
0
2
F
E
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
,
8
9
9
.
1
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
,
8
9
9
.
1
0
5
2
0
3
9
1
Y
B
S
D
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
B
R
I
S
T
O
L
0
7
3
1
1
5
S
F
0
8
/
1
7
/
1
5
0
1
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
S
A
N
I
T
A
R
Y
F
E
E
S
9
5
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
5
0
2
0
8
,
2
0
4
.
6
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
8
,
2
0
4
.
6
6
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
8
,
2
0
4
.
6
6
5
2
0
3
9
2
Y
O
R
K
A
C
E
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
A
C
E
&
R
A
D
I
O
S
H
A
C
K
1
5
7
2
5
7
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
S
C
R
E
W
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
1
.
3
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
.
3
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
.
3
0
5
2
0
3
9
3
Y
O
R
K
S
C
H
O
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
S
C
H
O
O
L
D
I
S
T
#
1
1
5
0
7
3
1
1
5
-
L
C
0
8
/
1
0
/
1
5
0
1
M
A
Y
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
L
A
N
D
C
A
S
H
9
5
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
5
3
1
7
,
6
3
9
.
1
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
7
,
6
3
9
.
1
6
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
7
,
6
3
9
.
1
6
5
2
0
3
9
4
Y
O
U
N
G
M
M
A
R
L
Y
S
J
.
Y
O
U
N
G
0
7
0
7
1
5
0
7
/
2
3
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
7
/
1
5
E
D
C
M
E
E
T
I
N
G
M
I
N
U
T
E
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
5
9
.
2
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
9
.
2
5
*
0
7
0
8
1
5
0
7
/
2
9
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
0
8
/
1
5
P
L
A
N
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
9
0
-
0
8
2
-
8
2
-
0
0
-
0
0
1
1
4
4
.
0
0
0
2
M
E
E
T
I
N
G
M
I
N
U
T
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
4
.
0
0
*
Page 24 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
0
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
9
4
Y
O
U
N
G
M
M
A
R
L
Y
S
J
.
Y
O
U
N
G
0
7
1
5
1
5
0
8
/
0
4
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
1
5
/
1
5
A
D
M
I
N
M
E
E
T
I
N
G
M
I
N
U
T
E
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
4
8
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
8
.
0
0
*
0
7
2
1
1
5
0
8
/
1
2
/
1
5
0
1
0
7
/
2
1
/
1
5
P
W
C
O
M
M
I
T
T
E
E
M
E
E
T
I
N
G
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
7
1
.
7
5
0
2
M
I
N
U
T
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
1
.
7
5
*
0
7
2
3
1
5
0
8
/
0
5
/
1
5
0
1
P
L
A
N
C
O
U
N
C
I
L
M
E
E
T
I
N
G
M
I
N
U
T
E
S
9
0
-
0
8
3
-
8
3
-
0
0
-
0
0
1
1
4
7
.
5
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
7
.
5
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
7
0
.
5
0
5
2
0
3
9
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T
O
T
A
L
D
E
P
O
S
I
T
0
8
2
5
1
5
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
0
1
T
O
T
A
L
D
I
R
E
C
T
D
E
P
O
S
I
T
S
1
0
2
.
1
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
2
.
1
7
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
2
.
1
7
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
4
6
3
,
5
3
6
.
1
3
Page 25 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
P
A
G
E
:
1
TI
M
E
:
0
9
:
2
1
:
0
1
D
I
R
E
C
T
D
E
P
O
S
I
T
A
U
D
I
T
R
E
P
O
R
T
ID
:
A
P
6
C
0
0
0
P
.
C
B
L
D
E
P
O
S
I
T
N
A
C
H
A
F
I
L
E
VE
N
D
O
R
N
A
M
E
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
E
P
O
S
I
T
A
M
O
U
N
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
--
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
AN
T
H
O
N
Y
H
O
U
L
E
H
O
U
L
E
A
1
0
2
.
1
7
R
E
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
F
O
R
C
L
O
T
H
I
N
G
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
O
F
D
I
R
E
C
T
D
E
P
O
S
I
T
S
1
0
2
.
1
7
To
t
a
l
#
o
f
V
e
n
d
o
r
s
:
1
Page 26 of 44
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
8
:
0
5
:
2
0
M
A
N
U
A
L
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
ID
:
A
P
2
2
5
0
0
0
.
C
B
L
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
#
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
0
0
0
1
8
F
N
B
O
F
I
R
S
T
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
B
A
N
K
O
M
A
H
A
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
A
.
S
I
M
M
O
N
S
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
9
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
5
.
5
5
0
2
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
9
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
1
.
6
4
0
3
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
9
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
5
.
5
2
0
4
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
9
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
2
1
.
3
4
0
5
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
9
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
0
0
.
9
0
0
6
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
9
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
2
1
.
3
4
0
7
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
9
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
1
.
6
4
0
8
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
9
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
5
.
5
2
0
9
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
3
0
-
0
7
/
2
9
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
9
.
4
0
1
0
N
E
O
P
O
S
T
-
R
E
D
I
N
K
C
A
R
T
R
I
D
G
E
F
O
R
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
1
0
1
3
6
.
9
9
1
1
P
O
S
T
A
G
E
M
A
C
H
I
N
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
6
9
.
8
4
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
B
.
O
L
S
E
M
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
W
A
R
E
H
O
U
S
E
D
I
R
E
C
T
-
F
O
L
D
E
R
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
1
0
9
.
5
0
0
2
M
E
Y
E
R
C
O
-
E
C
A
S
T
R
E
P
A
I
R
K
I
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
5
4
.
4
8
0
3
W
A
R
E
H
O
U
S
E
D
I
R
E
C
T
-
P
A
P
E
R
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
1
0
3
2
9
.
4
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
9
3
.
3
8
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
B
.
O
L
S
O
N
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
I
L
C
M
A
R
E
N
E
W
A
L
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
F
E
E
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
0
3
2
5
.
0
0
0
2
I
M
L
C
O
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
1
2
2
,
3
7
5
.
0
0
0
3
I
C
M
A
C
O
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
1
2
4
0
.
0
0
0
4
I
C
M
A
C
O
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
T
R
A
V
E
L
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
1
5
3
3
9
.
2
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
,
0
7
9
.
2
0
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
B
.
R
E
I
S
I
N
G
E
R
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
8
.
5
0
0
2
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
6
.
3
8
0
3
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
8
.
5
0
0
4
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
1
.
7
0
0
5
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
5
5
.
2
8
0
6
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
1
.
7
0
0
7
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
6
.
3
8
0
8
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
8
.
5
0
0
9
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
9
-
0
7
/
2
8
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
0
.
6
3
1
0
A
T
&
T
U
-
V
E
R
S
E
-
0
6
/
2
4
-
0
7
/
2
3
T
O
W
N
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
5
2
.
0
0
1
1
S
Q
U
A
R
E
P
A
R
K
S
I
G
N
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
2
V
E
R
M
O
N
T
S
Y
S
T
E
M
-
R
E
C
T
R
A
C
A
N
N
U
A
L
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
4
,
0
0
7
.
3
8
1
3
M
A
I
N
T
E
N
A
N
C
E
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
4
A
R
E
A
R
E
S
T
-
0
6
/
1
9
-
0
7
/
3
1
P
O
R
T
-
O
-
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
1
,
5
3
2
.
0
0
1
5
L
E
T
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
6
P
E
S
C
O
L
A
G
R
O
U
P
-
P
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
S
H
I
R
T
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
4
7
1
.
3
6
1
7
G
O
L
D
M
E
D
A
L
#
2
9
2
8
5
5
-
B
E
E
C
H
E
R
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
7
4
4
7
.
3
6
1
8
C
O
N
C
E
S
S
I
O
N
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
9
G
O
L
D
M
E
D
A
L
#
2
9
2
8
5
4
-
B
R
I
D
G
E
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
7
6
5
4
.
2
5
2
0
C
O
N
C
E
S
S
I
O
N
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
2
1
G
O
L
D
M
E
D
A
L
#
2
9
3
3
7
8
-
B
R
I
D
G
E
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
7
4
1
4
.
9
2
Page 27 of 44
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
8
:
0
5
:
2
0
M
A
N
U
A
L
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
ID
:
A
P
2
2
5
0
0
0
.
C
B
L
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
#
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
0
0
0
1
8
F
N
B
O
F
I
R
S
T
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
B
A
N
K
O
M
A
H
A
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
B
.
R
E
I
S
I
N
G
E
R
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
2
2
C
O
N
C
E
S
S
I
O
N
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
2
3
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
6
1
8
8
7
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
2
.
4
5
2
4
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
4
3
2
5
5
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
3
4
.
3
2
2
5
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
5
2
3
6
0
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
2
.
4
5
2
6
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
7
4
4
3
6
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
3
4
.
3
2
2
7
I
P
R
O
M
O
T
U
-
R
I
B
S
O
N
R
I
V
E
R
P
I
L
S
N
E
R
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
2
0
7
.
0
8
2
8
G
L
A
S
S
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
2
9
S
T
E
V
E
N
S
-
P
A
R
K
S
S
H
I
R
T
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
6
5
.
0
0
3
0
A
T
&
T
U
-
V
E
R
S
E
-
0
5
/
2
4
-
0
6
/
2
3
T
O
W
N
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
5
2
.
0
0
3
1
S
Q
U
A
R
E
P
A
R
K
S
I
G
N
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
3
2
S
Q
U
A
R
E
P
A
R
K
S
I
G
N
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
,
2
0
4
.
4
6
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
C
.
H
E
I
N
E
N
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
A
P
A
-
I
L
S
T
A
T
E
C
O
N
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
1
2
3
0
0
.
0
0
0
2
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
0
0
.
0
0
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
D
.
B
E
H
R
E
N
S
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
A
L
L
I
A
N
C
E
T
E
C
H
#
2
3
0
8
3
-
V
I
D
E
O
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
2
1
7
.
0
5
0
2
I
N
T
E
R
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
C
A
B
L
E
A
S
S
Y
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
1
7
.
0
5
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
D
.
H
E
N
N
E
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
H
O
M
E
D
E
P
O
-
O
U
T
L
E
T
S
8
2
-
8
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
8
3
.
8
8
0
2
H
O
M
E
D
E
P
O
-
S
T
E
P
L
A
D
D
E
R
8
2
-
8
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
2
5
9
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
4
2
.
8
8
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
E
.
D
H
U
S
E
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
8
8
9
5
7
5
2
3
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
8
.
7
9
0
2
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
8
8
9
5
7
5
2
3
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
8
.
7
9
0
3
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
8
8
9
5
7
5
2
3
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
8
.
7
9
0
4
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
3
4
0
6
1
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
4
5
.
3
5
0
5
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
3
4
0
6
1
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
4
5
.
3
6
0
6
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
3
4
0
6
1
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
4
5
.
3
6
0
7
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
4
3
2
5
4
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
4
.
7
8
0
8
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
4
3
2
5
4
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
4
.
7
8
0
9
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
4
3
2
5
4
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
4
.
7
8
1
0
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
5
2
3
5
9
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
1
.
4
0
1
1
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
5
2
3
5
9
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
1
.
4
0
1
2
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
5
2
3
5
9
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
1
.
4
0
1
3
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
6
1
8
8
6
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
3
.
8
1
1
4
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
6
1
8
8
6
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
3
.
8
1
1
5
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
6
1
8
8
6
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
3
.
8
2
1
6
N
A
P
A
#
1
1
2
1
0
2
-
L
A
M
P
,
P
I
G
T
A
I
L
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
8
5
.
8
4
1
7
A
N
G
L
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
8
W
A
T
E
R
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
S
#
0
2
5
8
8
5
2
-
I
T
R
O
N
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
6
4
3
,
4
8
0
.
0
0
1
9
E
N
D
P
O
I
N
T
S
,
B
A
C
K
P
L
A
T
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
2
0
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
7
4
4
3
5
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
4
5
.
3
5
Page 28 of 44
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
8
:
0
5
:
2
0
M
A
N
U
A
L
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
ID
:
A
P
2
2
5
0
0
0
.
C
B
L
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
#
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
0
0
0
1
8
F
N
B
O
F
I
R
S
T
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
B
A
N
K
O
M
A
H
A
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
E
.
D
H
U
S
E
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
2
1
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
7
4
4
3
5
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
4
5
.
3
6
2
2
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
7
4
4
3
5
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
4
5
.
3
6
2
3
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
8
0
2
9
3
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
5
.
5
2
2
4
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
8
0
2
9
3
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
5
.
5
2
2
5
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
8
0
2
9
3
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
5
5
.
5
2
2
6
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
8
9
4
7
8
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
4
5
.
3
6
2
7
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
8
9
4
7
8
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
4
5
.
3
6
2
8
A
R
A
M
A
R
K
#
1
5
9
0
0
8
9
4
7
8
-
U
N
I
F
O
R
M
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
4
5
.
3
5
2
9
G
L
O
V
E
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
2
0
.
6
8
3
0
G
L
O
V
E
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
2
0
.
6
8
3
1
G
L
O
V
E
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
2
0
.
6
7
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
,
7
7
8
.
9
9
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
J
.
D
Y
O
N
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
S
A
M
S
-
K
E
Y
B
O
A
R
D
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
1
3
.
5
8
0
2
S
A
M
S
-
K
E
Y
B
O
A
R
D
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
1
7
.
3
9
0
3
S
A
M
S
-
K
E
Y
B
O
A
R
D
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
8
.
7
7
0
4
S
A
M
S
-
P
A
P
E
R
T
O
W
E
L
,
W
I
P
E
S
,
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
1
0
4
0
.
3
2
0
5
K
L
E
E
N
E
X
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
0
.
0
6
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
J
.
W
E
I
S
S
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
T
A
R
G
E
T
-
S
U
M
M
E
R
R
E
A
D
I
N
G
P
R
I
Z
E
S
8
2
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
8
0
3
2
0
.
1
2
0
2
D
O
L
L
A
R
T
R
E
E
-
S
U
M
M
E
R
R
E
A
D
I
N
G
8
2
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
8
0
3
9
.
0
7
0
3
P
R
I
Z
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
3
5
9
.
1
9
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
L
.
H
I
L
T
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
D
A
V
E
A
U
T
O
#
2
3
2
6
6
-
S
Q
U
A
D
R
E
P
A
I
R
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
1
6
5
.
0
0
0
2
D
A
V
E
A
U
T
O
#
2
3
3
0
8
-
S
Q
U
A
D
R
E
P
A
I
R
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
8
1
5
.
0
0
0
3
S
T
R
E
I
C
H
E
R
#
I
1
1
5
9
6
2
4
-
S
H
I
R
T
S
,
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
4
4
6
.
9
4
0
4
P
A
N
T
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
5
P
R
O
-
V
I
S
I
O
N
#
2
7
0
4
7
7
-
C
A
M
E
R
A
U
N
I
T
S
2
5
-
2
0
5
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
7
0
5
,
4
7
0
.
9
5
0
6
F
O
R
2
N
E
W
S
Q
U
A
D
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
7
S
T
R
E
I
C
H
E
R
#
I
1
1
6
0
1
8
0
-
S
H
I
R
T
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
3
2
.
0
0
0
8
S
T
R
E
I
C
H
E
R
#
I
1
1
6
0
0
4
3
-
S
H
I
R
T
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
0
3
2
.
0
0
0
9
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
-
J
U
N
E
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
F
O
R
I
N
-
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
3
0
4
.
1
4
1
0
C
A
R
U
N
I
T
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
1
D
A
V
E
A
U
T
O
#
2
3
3
2
2
-
O
I
L
C
H
A
N
G
E
,
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
1
5
0
.
0
0
1
2
R
O
T
A
T
E
T
I
R
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
3
D
A
V
E
A
U
T
O
#
2
3
3
5
5
-
C
H
A
N
G
E
O
I
L
,
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
2
6
9
.
0
0
1
4
R
O
T
O
R
S
,
R
O
T
A
T
E
T
I
R
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
5
G
A
L
L
S
#
0
0
3
8
1
3
1
8
5
-
M
A
G
L
I
T
E
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
2
2
.
1
7
1
6
T
R
A
F
F
I
C
W
A
N
D
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
,
7
0
7
.
2
0
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
L
.
P
I
C
K
E
R
I
N
G
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
Q
U
I
L
L
#
5
7
5
9
5
1
3
-
P
E
N
C
I
L
C
U
P
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
1
0
5
.
0
9
0
2
Q
U
I
L
L
#
5
8
3
1
3
3
4
-
P
O
C
K
E
T
F
I
L
E
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
1
0
4
4
.
8
5
Page 29 of 44
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
8
:
0
5
:
2
0
M
A
N
U
A
L
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
ID
:
A
P
2
2
5
0
0
0
.
C
B
L
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
#
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
0
0
0
1
8
F
N
B
O
F
I
R
S
T
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
B
A
N
K
O
M
A
H
A
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
L
.
P
I
C
K
E
R
I
N
G
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
3
I
I
M
C
A
N
N
U
A
L
M
E
M
B
E
R
S
H
I
P
D
U
E
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
0
1
5
5
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
4
.
9
4
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
M
.
P
F
I
S
T
E
R
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
A
M
A
Z
O
N
-
L
A
S
E
R
J
E
T
C
O
L
O
R
P
R
I
N
T
E
R
8
4
-
8
4
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
3
5
2
6
5
.
2
6
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
6
5
.
2
6
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
N
.
D
E
C
K
E
R
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
A
C
C
U
R
I
N
T
#
1
2
4
9
3
0
4
-
2
0
1
5
0
6
3
0
-
J
U
N
E
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
5
0
.
0
0
0
2
S
E
A
R
C
H
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
3
M
I
N
E
R
E
L
E
C
T
#
2
5
7
6
0
8
-
U
P
D
A
T
E
D
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
5
5
.
5
0
0
4
R
A
I
D
O
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
5
M
I
N
E
R
E
L
E
C
T
#
2
5
7
4
3
8
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
9
5
.
0
0
0
6
L
I
G
H
T
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
7
M
I
N
E
R
E
L
E
C
T
#
2
5
7
6
0
0
-
R
E
S
E
T
F
U
S
E
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
9
5
.
0
0
0
8
M
I
N
E
R
E
L
E
C
T
#
2
2
5
7
0
1
5
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
2
0
9
.
1
4
0
9
C
O
R
N
E
R
L
I
G
H
T
A
N
D
L
A
M
P
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
0
M
I
N
E
R
E
L
E
C
T
#
2
5
7
7
3
2
-
F
I
X
E
D
W
I
R
E
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
4
7
.
5
0
1
1
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
F
O
R
C
A
M
E
R
A
S
Y
S
T
E
M
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
2
M
I
N
E
R
E
L
E
C
T
#
2
5
7
6
9
8
-
R
E
S
E
A
T
E
D
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
4
7
.
5
0
1
3
H
A
R
D
D
R
I
V
E
O
F
D
I
G
I
T
A
L
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
4
P
A
T
R
O
L
L
E
R
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
5
A
T
&
T
#
6
3
0
5
5
3
3
4
3
6
-
0
6
1
5
-
0
6
/
2
5
-
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
8
8
.
4
6
1
6
0
7
/
2
4
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
7
M
I
N
E
R
E
L
E
C
T
#
2
5
7
8
2
1
-
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
4
7
.
5
0
1
8
F
L
A
S
H
L
I
G
H
T
C
H
A
R
G
E
R
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
9
M
I
N
E
R
E
L
E
C
T
#
2
5
7
8
2
2
-
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
4
7
.
5
0
2
0
C
A
M
E
R
A
R
E
C
O
R
D
I
N
G
S
Y
S
T
E
M
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
2
1
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
7
/
0
8
-
0
8
/
0
7
C
A
B
L
E
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
4
.
2
7
2
2
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
P
R
I
N
T
#
1
6
9
0
-
5
0
0
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
3
0
4
5
.
0
0
2
3
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
C
A
R
D
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
2
4
S
H
R
E
D
-
I
T
#
9
4
0
6
6
7
6
4
2
0
-
J
U
L
Y
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
1
1
8
.
6
6
2
5
O
N
-
S
I
T
E
S
H
R
E
D
D
I
N
G
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
2
6
M
I
N
E
R
E
L
E
C
T
#
2
5
7
6
9
7
-
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
9
5
.
0
0
2
7
H
O
R
N
S
P
E
A
K
E
R
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
2
8
M
I
N
E
R
E
L
E
C
T
#
1
2
7
0
5
-
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
2
5
-
2
0
5
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
6
0
6
,
7
0
5
.
0
0
2
9
O
F
C
A
R
R
A
D
I
O
S
I
N
N
E
W
S
Q
U
A
D
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
7
,
7
5
1
.
0
3
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
P
.
R
A
T
O
S
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
A
M
A
Z
O
N
-
T
W
O
P
H
O
N
E
C
A
S
E
S
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
4
3
.
0
8
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
3
.
0
8
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
R
.
F
R
E
D
R
I
C
K
S
O
N
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
4
-
0
8
/
1
2
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
2
9
.
2
4
0
2
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
4
-
0
8
/
1
2
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
2
1
.
9
3
0
3
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
4
-
0
8
/
1
2
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
2
9
.
2
4
0
4
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
4
-
0
8
/
1
2
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
4
0
.
2
0
0
5
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
4
-
0
8
/
1
2
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
9
0
.
0
2
Page 30 of 44
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
8
:
0
5
:
2
0
M
A
N
U
A
L
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
ID
:
A
P
2
2
5
0
0
0
.
C
B
L
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
#
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
0
0
0
1
8
F
N
B
O
F
I
R
S
T
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
B
A
N
K
O
M
A
H
A
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
R
.
F
R
E
D
R
I
C
K
S
O
N
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
6
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
4
-
0
8
/
1
2
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
4
0
.
2
0
0
7
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
4
-
0
8
/
1
2
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
2
1
.
9
3
0
8
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
4
-
0
8
/
1
2
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
2
9
.
2
4
0
9
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
2
4
-
0
8
/
1
2
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
2
9
.
4
0
1
0
N
E
W
T
E
K
-
M
O
N
T
H
L
Y
W
E
B
U
P
K
E
E
P
F
E
E
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
5
0
1
5
.
9
5
1
1
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
-
J
U
N
E
2
0
1
5
C
E
L
L
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
7
9
.
3
7
1
2
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
-
J
U
N
E
2
0
1
5
C
E
L
L
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
5
8
3
.
3
0
1
3
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
-
J
U
N
E
2
0
1
5
C
E
L
L
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
8
0
.
8
5
1
4
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
-
J
U
N
E
2
0
1
5
C
E
L
L
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
4
6
.
6
9
1
5
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
-
J
U
N
E
2
0
1
5
C
E
L
L
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
2
5
3
.
2
4
1
6
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
-
J
U
N
E
2
0
1
5
C
E
L
L
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
9
2
.
1
7
1
7
V
E
R
I
Z
O
N
-
J
U
N
E
2
0
1
5
C
E
L
L
C
H
A
R
G
E
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
1
2
5
.
2
1
1
8
C
O
M
C
A
S
T
-
0
6
/
1
1
-
0
7
/
0
9
I
N
T
E
R
N
E
T
8
2
-
8
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
0
7
9
6
.
4
4
1
9
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
A
N
D
I
N
I
T
I
A
L
S
E
T
U
P
F
E
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
,
8
0
4
.
6
2
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
R
.
H
A
R
M
O
N
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
A
M
A
Z
O
N
-
P
L
A
S
T
I
C
B
A
L
L
S
,
C
O
L
A
N
D
E
R
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
7
8
.
9
7
0
2
I
N
F
L
A
T
A
B
L
E
P
O
O
L
,
F
I
L
M
C
A
N
I
S
T
E
R
,
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
3
M
A
I
L
I
N
G
T
U
B
E
S
,
N
A
M
E
T
A
G
S
,
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
4
A
M
B
E
R
L
E
D
T
E
A
L
I
G
H
T
C
A
N
D
L
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
5
W
A
L
M
A
R
T
-
P
R
E
S
C
H
O
O
L
C
L
A
S
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
5
7
.
1
4
0
6
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
3
6
.
1
1
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
R
.
H
O
R
N
E
R
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
H
O
M
E
D
E
P
O
-
W
E
E
D
K
I
L
L
E
R
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
2
4
3
.
4
5
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
4
3
.
4
5
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
R
.
M
I
K
O
L
A
S
E
K
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
G
U
N
G
R
I
P
S
#
1
2
8
4
8
-
N
E
W
G
U
N
G
R
I
P
S
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
2
5
.
9
0
0
2
P
O
L
I
C
E
S
T
O
R
E
-
G
R
I
P
B
U
S
H
I
N
G
,
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
1
0
0
.
8
5
0
3
H
A
M
M
E
R
,
G
R
I
P
S
C
R
E
W
S
,
P
I
S
T
O
L
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
4
B
E
N
C
H
B
L
O
C
K
,
A
R
M
O
R
E
R
S
T
O
O
L
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
2
6
.
7
5
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
R
.
W
R
I
G
H
T
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
1
2
.
0
0
0
2
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
3
.
0
0
0
3
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
6
6
.
0
0
0
4
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
1
2
.
0
0
0
5
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
4
.
0
0
0
6
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
1
0
.
5
0
0
7
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
1
0
.
5
0
0
8
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
1
3
.
0
0
0
9
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
4
.
0
0
1
0
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
4
0
1
2
.
0
0
1
1
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
H
R
A
F
E
E
S
8
2
-
8
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
1
2
.
0
0
1
2
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
F
S
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
6
.
0
0
Page 31 of 44
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
8
:
0
5
:
2
0
M
A
N
U
A
L
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
ID
:
A
P
2
2
5
0
0
0
.
C
B
L
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
#
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
0
0
0
1
8
F
N
B
O
F
I
R
S
T
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
B
A
N
K
O
M
A
H
A
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
R
.
W
R
I
G
H
T
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
1
3
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
F
S
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
6
.
0
0
1
4
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
F
S
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
2
0
.
9
9
1
5
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
F
S
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
2
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
3
.
0
0
1
6
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
F
S
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
4
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
3
.
0
0
1
7
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
F
S
A
F
E
E
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
6
.
0
0
1
8
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
F
S
A
F
E
E
S
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
1
6
3
.
0
0
1
9
D
A
C
#
2
9
3
0
8
-
J
U
L
Y
2
0
1
5
F
S
A
F
E
E
S
0
1
-
6
4
0
-
5
2
-
0
0
-
5
2
4
0
3
.
0
0
2
0
R
U
S
H
#
1
3
4
8
1
-
N
E
W
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
T
E
S
T
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
4
0
.
0
0
2
1
R
U
S
H
#
1
3
4
8
1
-
N
E
W
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
T
E
S
T
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
4
0
.
0
0
2
2
R
U
S
H
#
1
3
4
8
1
-
N
E
W
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
T
E
S
T
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
8
0
.
0
0
2
3
R
U
S
H
#
1
3
4
8
1
-
N
E
W
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
T
E
S
T
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
4
0
.
0
0
2
4
W
A
L
D
E
N
S
-
5
C
I
T
Y
H
A
L
L
K
E
Y
S
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
1
0
1
8
.
7
5
2
5
W
A
L
D
E
N
S
-
L
O
C
K
U
N
I
T
S
F
O
R
C
I
T
Y
0
1
-
1
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
1
0
3
7
.
8
0
2
6
H
A
L
L
F
I
L
I
N
G
C
A
B
I
N
E
T
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
6
6
.
5
4
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
S
.
R
E
D
M
O
N
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
W
A
L
M
A
R
T
-
P
A
R
A
D
E
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
1
1
2
.
7
5
0
2
J
E
W
E
L
-
B
U
N
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
7
5
.
2
1
0
3
W
A
L
M
A
R
T
-
B
U
N
S
,
B
U
R
G
E
R
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
7
9
5
.
7
0
0
4
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
P
R
I
N
T
-
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
C
A
R
D
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
1
0
1
9
8
.
2
5
0
5
J
E
W
E
L
-
W
A
T
E
R
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
1
0
.
0
0
0
6
S
P
E
E
D
W
A
Y
-
I
C
E
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
2
4
.
1
9
0
7
W
A
L
M
A
R
T
-
B
U
N
S
,
O
T
T
E
R
P
O
P
S
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
7
4
4
.
0
0
0
8
J
E
W
E
L
-
B
U
N
S
,
W
A
T
E
R
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
7
2
1
.
6
1
0
9
P
R
O
C
E
S
S
I
N
G
F
E
E
-
W
I
L
L
B
E
0
1
-
1
2
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
2
3
9
.
0
0
1
0
R
E
V
E
R
S
E
D
N
E
X
T
M
O
N
T
H
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
5
0
.
7
1
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
S
.
R
E
M
U
S
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
C
O
.
H
E
A
L
T
H
D
E
P
T
,
-
F
O
O
D
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
5
7
1
.
7
6
0
3
H
A
N
D
L
I
N
G
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
F
E
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
5
7
1
.
7
6
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
S
.
S
L
E
E
Z
E
R
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
I
L
C
A
-
M
E
M
B
E
R
S
H
I
P
F
O
R
S
U
M
M
E
R
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
1
2
2
0
.
0
0
0
2
F
I
E
L
D
D
A
Y
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
0
.
0
0
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
T
.
K
L
I
N
G
E
L
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
D
A
V
E
A
U
T
O
#
2
3
2
4
8
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
S
E
A
T
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
7
5
0
.
0
0
0
2
B
A
S
E
A
N
D
P
O
W
E
R
S
E
A
T
S
W
I
T
C
H
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
3
D
A
V
E
A
U
T
O
#
2
3
2
8
2
-
O
I
L
C
H
A
N
G
E
,
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
1
4
8
.
0
0
0
4
R
O
T
A
T
E
T
I
R
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
5
M
E
N
A
R
D
S
#
5
3
5
8
3
-
D
O
W
E
L
S
,
K
L
E
E
N
E
X
,
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
2
0
9
8
.
3
0
0
6
C
A
R
C
L
E
A
N
E
R
S
,
H
A
C
K
S
A
W
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
7
D
A
V
E
A
U
T
O
#
2
3
3
2
6
-
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
1
0
0
.
0
0
0
8
S
H
U
T
-
O
F
F
S
W
I
T
C
H
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
9
D
A
V
E
A
U
T
O
#
2
3
3
3
0
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
2
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
3
3
3
.
0
0
Page 32 of 44
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
8
:
0
5
:
2
0
M
A
N
U
A
L
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
ID
:
A
P
2
2
5
0
0
0
.
C
B
L
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
#
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
0
0
0
1
8
F
N
B
O
F
I
R
S
T
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
B
A
N
K
O
M
A
H
A
0
8
/
2
5
/
1
5
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
T
.
K
L
I
N
G
E
L
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
1
0
T
I
R
E
S
,
T
I
R
E
S
E
N
S
O
R
&
W
H
E
E
L
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
1
1
S
T
U
D
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
4
2
9
.
3
0
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
T
.
K
O
N
E
N
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
A
U
R
O
R
A
S
P
R
I
N
G
#
0
5
5
2
1
3
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
0
8
8
4
.
1
4
0
2
F
R
O
N
T
S
P
R
I
N
G
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
3
R
I
V
E
R
V
I
E
W
#
F
O
C
S
3
5
8
1
6
0
-
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
0
9
5
8
.
6
2
0
4
S
T
E
E
R
I
N
G
S
H
A
F
T
&
R
O
T
O
R
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
8
4
2
.
7
6
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
T
.
N
E
L
S
O
N
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
F
R
E
E
M
E
N
A
S
-
F
I
S
H
I
N
G
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
&
7
9
-
7
9
5
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
0
6
4
5
.
9
5
0
2
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
4
5
.
9
5
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
T
.
S
O
E
L
K
E
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
A
U
T
O
Z
O
N
E
-
B
A
T
T
E
R
Y
C
A
B
L
E
S
F
O
R
5
2
-
5
2
0
-
5
6
-
0
0
-
5
6
1
3
2
8
.
4
7
0
2
B
L
A
C
K
B
E
R
R
Y
L
I
F
T
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
8
.
4
7
*
0
8
2
5
1
5
-
U
C
O
Y
0
7
/
3
1
/
1
5
0
1
A
D
V
A
N
C
E
D
D
I
S
P
O
S
A
L
-
J
U
N
E
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
0
1
-
5
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
2
9
9
,
5
0
7
.
8
2
0
2
A
D
V
A
N
C
E
D
D
I
S
P
O
S
A
L
-
J
U
N
E
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
0
1
-
5
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
1
2
,
5
9
5
.
5
6
0
3
A
D
V
A
N
C
E
D
D
I
S
P
O
S
A
L
-
J
U
N
E
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
0
1
-
5
4
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
1
1
6
8
.
3
0
0
4
T
R
U
G
R
E
E
N
#
3
5
0
8
1
4
5
3
-
C
I
T
Y
G
R
O
U
N
D
S
7
9
-
7
9
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
9
5
9
,
7
6
4
.
0
0
0
5
L
A
W
N
T
R
E
A
M
E
N
T
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
1
2
,
0
3
5
.
6
8
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
5
4
,
3
9
8
.
6
6
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
1
5
4
,
3
9
8
.
6
6
Page 33 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
1
2
:
4
2
:
5
7
M
A
N
U
A
L
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
ID
:
A
P
2
2
5
0
0
0
.
C
B
L
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
#
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
3
1
0
6
2
K
C
R
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
R
'
S
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
1
8
3
0
2
6
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
0
1
F
I
L
E
D
4
N
E
W
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
L
I
E
N
S
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
8
1
9
6
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
9
6
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
9
6
.
0
0
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
1
9
6
.
0
0
Page 34 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
1
0
:
1
5
:
2
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
0
7
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
0
6
E
N
C
A
P
E
N
C
A
P
,
I
N
C
.
1
3
5
3
/
1
4
7
5
0
8
/
0
5
/
1
5
0
1
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
'
S
P
Y
M
T
#
3
-
S
U
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
1
2
-
1
1
2
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
1
6
5
,
4
7
1
.
5
2
0
2
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
&
G
R
E
E
N
B
R
I
A
R
P
O
N
D
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
3
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
4
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
'
S
P
Y
M
T
#
3
-
S
U
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
2
3
-
2
3
0
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
1
8
2
,
5
7
4
.
8
4
0
5
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
&
G
R
E
E
N
B
R
I
A
R
P
O
N
D
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
6
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
S
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
,
0
4
6
.
3
6
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
8
,
0
4
6
.
3
6
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
8
,
0
4
6
.
3
6
Page 35 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
0
7
:
5
0
:
3
2
M
A
N
U
A
L
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
ID
:
A
P
2
2
5
0
0
0
.
C
B
L
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
#
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
3
1
0
6
3
K
C
R
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
R
'
S
0
8
/
1
2
/
1
5
1
8
3
1
8
4
0
8
/
1
2
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
L
E
A
S
E
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
L
I
E
N
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
8
4
9
.
0
0
0
2
F
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
V
I
E
W
E
C
O
N
O
M
I
C
9
0
-
0
0
7
-
0
7
-
0
0
-
0
0
1
1
4
9
.
0
0
0
3
I
N
C
E
N
T
I
V
E
A
G
R
E
E
M
E
N
T
R
E
L
E
A
S
E
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
0
4
L
O
T
1
9
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
D
R
O
R
D
I
N
A
N
C
E
9
0
-
0
8
2
-
8
2
-
0
0
-
0
0
1
1
9
9
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
9
7
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
9
7
.
0
0
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
1
9
7
.
0
0
Page 36 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
O
NS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
2
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
1
4
:
0
4
:
2
4
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
2
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
0
7
H
A
R
D
P
A
V
E
B
U
I
L
D
E
R
S
P
A
V
I
N
G
L
L
C
1
4
0
2
5
0
5
-
F
0
8
/
1
0
/
1
5
0
1
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
'
S
P
Y
M
T
E
S
T
I
M
A
T
E
#
&
2
3
-
2
3
0
-
6
0
-
0
0
-
6
0
0
7
2
4
,
3
6
5
.
1
4
02
F
I
N
A
L
-
K
E
N
N
E
D
Y
R
O
A
D
W
I
D
E
N
I
N
G
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
4
,
3
6
5
.
1
4
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
4
,
3
6
5
.
1
4
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
2
4
,
3
6
5
.
1
4
Page 37 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
3
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
1
0
:
2
9
:
3
5
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
3
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
0
8
E
N
C
A
P
E
N
C
A
P
,
I
N
C
.
1
4
3
4
0
7
/
2
9
/
1
5
0
1
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
M
A
R
K
E
T
P
L
A
C
E
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
0
1
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
4
0
1
,
1
6
6
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
1
6
6
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
,
1
6
6
.
0
0
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
1
,
1
6
6
.
0
0
Page 38 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
ION
S
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
3
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
1
0
:
4
8
:
4
9
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
3
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
0
9
R
0
0
0
1
5
0
8
R
Y
A
N
&
B
R
I
D
G
E
T
T
B
U
R
T
O
N
2
0
1
5
0
0
3
3
-
B
U
I
L
D
0
8
/
1
2
/
1
5
0
1
1
1
5
3
T
A
U
S
C
I
R
C
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
5
1
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
4
5
6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
0
2
1
1
5
3
T
A
U
S
C
I
R
C
L
E
B
U
I
L
D
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
5
2
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
4
5
4
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
Page 39 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
8
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
1
3
:
0
2
:
2
4
M
A
N
U
A
L
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
ID
:
A
P
2
2
5
0
0
0
.
C
B
L
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
C
H
E
C
K
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
#
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
D
A
T
E
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
3
1
0
6
4
K
C
R
K
E
N
D
A
L
L
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
R
'
S
0
8
/
1
4
/
1
5
1
8
3
2
1
8
0
8
/
1
4
/
1
5
0
1
R
E
L
E
A
S
E
3
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
L
I
E
N
S
A
N
D
5
1
-
5
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
4
8
1
9
6
.
0
0
0
2
F
I
L
E
1
N
E
W
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
L
I
E
N
*
*
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
*
*
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
9
6
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
9
6
.
0
0
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
1
9
6
.
0
0
Page 40 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
I
ONS
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
8
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
1
2
:
0
9
:
5
6
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
8
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
1
0
N
E
W
W
O
R
L
D
N
E
W
W
O
R
L
D
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
2
0
1
5
U
P
G
R
A
D
E
0
8
/
1
4
/
1
5
0
1
A
E
G
I
S
U
P
G
R
A
D
E
C
O
S
T
0
1
-
2
1
0
-
5
4
-
0
0
-
5
4
6
9
2
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
2
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
2
,
7
5
0
.
0
0
Page 41 of 44
01
-
1
1
0
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
12
-
1
1
2
SU
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
SS
A
42
-
4
2
0
DE
B
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
83
-
8
3
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
DEBT SERVICE
01
-
1
2
0
FI
N
A
N
C
E
15
-
1
5
5
MO
T
O
R
FU
E
L
TA
X
(M
F
T
)
51
-
5
1
0
WA
T
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
84
-
8
4
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
CAPITAL
01
-
2
1
0
PO
L
I
C
E
23
-
2
1
6
MU
N
I
C
I
P
A
L
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
52
-
5
2
0
SE
W
E
R
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
87
-
8
7
0
CO
U
N
T
R
Y
S
I
D
E
TIF
01
-
2
2
0
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
23
-
2
3
0
CI
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
72
-
7
2
0
LA
N
D
CA
S
H
88
-
8
8
0
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
TIF
01
-
4
1
0
ST
R
E
E
T
OP
E
R
AT
IO
N
S
25
-
2
0
5
PO
L
I
C
E
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
0
PA
R
K
S
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
90
-
X
X
X
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
ESCROW
01
-
6
4
0
AD
M
I
N
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
25
-
2
1
5
PU
B
L
I
C
WO
R
K
S
CA
P
I
T
A
L
79
-
7
9
5
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
DE
P
T
95
-
X
X
X
ES
C
R
O
W
DEPOSIT
11
-
1
1
1
FO
X
HI
L
L
SS
A
25
-
2
2
5
PA
R
K
S
& RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CA
P
I
T
A
L
82
-
8
2
0
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
OP
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
DA
T
E
:
0
8
/
1
9
/
1
5
U
N
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
TI
M
E
:
1
0
:
0
2
:
3
0
C
H
E
C
K
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
PR
G
I
D
:
A
P
2
1
5
0
0
0
.
W
O
W
CH
E
C
K
D
A
T
E
:
0
8
/
2
0
/
1
5
CH
E
C
K
#
V
E
N
D
O
R
#
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
N
V
O
I
C
E
I
T
E
M
N
U
M
B
E
R
D
A
T
E
#
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
#
I
T
E
M
A
M
T
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
2
0
3
9
6
R
0
0
0
1
5
0
9
J
O
N
A
T
H
A
N
&
R
A
I
N
A
P
L
A
C
Z
E
K
2
0
1
5
0
0
2
9
-
B
U
I
L
D
0
8
/
1
3
/
1
5
0
1
1
4
3
5
V
I
O
L
E
T
C
T
B
U
I
L
D
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
2
3
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
4
5
3
,
7
0
3
.
6
0
0
2
1
4
3
5
V
I
O
L
E
T
C
T
B
U
I
L
D
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
2
5
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
2
0
-
2
4
4
5
6
0
0
.
0
0
0
3
1
4
3
5
V
I
O
L
E
T
C
T
B
U
I
L
D
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
2
5
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
2
1
-
2
4
4
5
1
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
0
4
1
4
3
5
V
I
O
L
E
T
C
T
B
U
I
L
D
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
2
5
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
2
2
-
2
4
4
5
1
0
0
.
0
0
0
5
1
4
3
5
V
I
O
L
E
T
C
T
B
U
I
L
D
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
4
2
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
4
5
5
0
.
0
0
0
6
1
4
3
5
V
I
O
L
E
T
C
T
B
U
I
L
D
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
5
1
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
4
5
3
,
8
4
0
.
0
0
0
7
1
4
3
5
V
I
O
L
E
T
C
T
B
U
I
L
D
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
7
2
-
0
0
0
-
2
4
-
0
0
-
2
4
4
5
1
0
6
.
4
0
IN
V
O
I
C
E
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
*
CH
E
C
K
T
O
T
A
L
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
TO
T
A
L
A
M
O
U
N
T
P
A
I
D
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
Page 42 of 44
RE
G
U
L
A
R
O
V
E
R
T
I
M
E
T
O
T
A
L
I
M
R
F
F
I
C
A
T
O
T
A
L
S
AD
M
I
N
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
11
,
1
7
6
.
3
9
$
-
$
1
1
,
1
7
6
.
3
9
1,
2
1
9
.
3
4
$
78
3
.
4
5
$
13,179.18$
FI
N
A
N
C
E
8
0
5
5
2
5
-
8
0
5
5
2
5
91
1
5
6
62
5
3
3
959214
UN
I
T
E
D
C
I
T
Y
O
F
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
PA
Y
R
O
L
L
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
Aug
u
s
t
1
4
,
2
0
1
5
FI
N
A
N
C
E
8,05
5
.25
-
8,05
5
.25
91
1
.56
62
5
.33
9,592.14
PO
L
I
C
E
91
,
8
3
7
.
5
8
1
,
6
6
7
.
7
0
9
3
,
5
0
5
.
2
8
5
2
3
.
9
1
6
,
8
3
8
.
6
3
1
0
0
,
8
6
7
.
8
2
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
D
E
V
.
12
,
5
5
6
.
7
7
-
1
2
,
5
5
6
.
7
7
1
,
2
5
2
.
1
1
9
1
4
.
1
9
1
4
,
7
2
3
.
0
7
ST
R
E
E
T
S
12
,
7
1
0
.
3
5
-
1
2
,
7
1
0
.
3
5
1
,
3
4
7
.
4
1
9
3
8
.
7
0
1
4
,
9
9
6
.
4
6
WA
T
E
R
13
,
4
2
4
.
8
0
-
1
3
,
4
2
4
.
8
0
1
,
4
6
4
.
6
5
9
6
9
.
7
3
1
5
,
8
5
9
.
1
8
SE
W
E
R
7,
6
2
0
.
5
5
-
7
,
6
2
0
.
5
5
8
4
7
.
7
7
5
7
8
.
9
8
9
,
0
4
7
.
3
0
PA
R
K
S
17
,
6
4
2
.
9
2
1
1
1
.
4
6
1
7
,
7
5
4
.
3
8
1
,
5
5
6
.
4
0
1
,
3
2
7
.
4
6
2
0
,
6
3
8
.
2
4
RE
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
10
,
3
7
2
.
6
5
-
1
0
,
3
7
2
.
6
5
1
,
0
8
5
.
3
3
7
7
6
.
3
0
1
2
,
2
3
4
.
2
8
LI
B
R
A
R
Y
14
,
8
9
7
.
4
0
-
1
4
,
8
9
7
.
4
0
8
1
9
.
7
0
1
,
1
1
3
.
9
8
1
6
,
8
3
1
.
0
8
TO
T
A
L
S
20
0
,
2
9
4
.
6
6
$
1
,
7
7
9
.
1
6
$
2
0
2
,
0
7
3
.
8
2
$
1
1
,
0
2
8
.
1
8
$
1
4
,
8
6
6
.
7
5
$
2
2
7
,
9
6
8
.
7
5
$
TO
T
A
L
P
A
Y
R
O
L
L
227,968.75$ Page 43 of 44
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DATE
City Check Register (Pages 1-26)08/25/2015463,536.13
City MasterCard Bill Register (Pages 27-33)08/25/2015 154,398.66
SUB-TOTAL: $617,934.79
OTHER PAYABLES
Clerk's Check #131062 - Kendall County Recorder (Page 34)08/07/2015196.00
Manual Check #520306 - Encap (Page 35)08/07/2015 8,046.36
lkhk dll d ()
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
BILL LIST SUMMARY
Tuesday, August 25, 2015
Clerk's Check #131063 - Kendall County Recorder (Page 36)08/12/2015197.00
Manual Check #520307 - Builder's Paving LLC (Page 37)08/12/2015 24,365.14
Manual Check #520308 - Encap (Page 38)08/13/2015 1,166.00
Manual Check #520309 - Burton BUILD Check (Page 39)08/13/2015 10,000.00
Clerk's Check #131064 - Kendall County Recorder (Page 40)08/14/2015 196.00
Manual Check #520310 - New World Systems (Page 41)08/18/2015 2,750.00
Manual Check #520396 - Placzek BUILD Check (Page 42)08/20/2015 10,000.00
SUB-TOTAL: $56,916.50
Bi - Weekly (Page 43)08/14/2015 227,968.75
SUB-TOTAL: $227,968.75
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS:$902,820.04
PAYROLL
Pa
g
e
44
of
44
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
Mayor #1
Tracking Number
CC 2015-63
Appointment of FOIA Officer – Nicole Kathman
City Council – August 25, 2015
N/A
Majority
Approval
Appointment of the City’s Administrative Intern, Nicole Kathman, as a FOIA
Officer.
Bart Olson Administration
Name Department
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
See attached memo.
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
PW #1
Tracking Number
PW 2015-44
Blackberry Woods – Call of Cash Deposit
City Council – August 25, 2015
CC – 08/11/15
Postponement
PW 2015-44
Majority
Direction
Updated information regarding a call of a cash deposit for Blackberry Woods.
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, AICP Community Development
Name Department
As the City Council may recall, at the meeting held on August 11, 2015 it was at the
recommendation of staff that the City Council postpone the call of the cash deposit related to the
Blackberry Woods subdivision as the developer was coordinating with their subcontractors for
the completion of the remaining public improvements.
Since that time, the developer has submitted the attached detailed construction completion
information which is summarized below:
1. Copies of bid contracts with proposed contractors for all remaining public improvements
to be completed.
2. Schedule of proposed completion of remaining public improvements to be completed.
3. Confirmation that all remaining work is to be completed by 9/30, with the exception of
the detention pond which will be subject to consultant report and acceptance of the report
recommendations by the City.
At this time, staff is satisfied with the submitted requested information. Therefore we
recommend postponing the call of cash deposit until October 2015 when an update can be
provided to the City Council on the status of the completion of the public improvements.
If the City Council is in agreement, a formal letter will be sent to the developer regarding this
matter and a field meeting will be conducted by staff with the developer’s subcontractors for the
construction projects prior to work commencing. Should you have any questions; staff will be
available at Tuesday night’s meeting.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Brad Sanderson, EEI
Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk
Date: August 20, 2015
Subject: Blackberry Woods – Call of Cash Deposit
This memo is to provide an update as to the status of the completion of the improvements.
The City is currently holding a cash deposit in the amount of $174,016.00 for work to be
completed within the development.
Staff has requested a completion schedule for the remaining work from the developer. At this
point, the developer has not provided the requested information or shown any proof of moving
forward.
There are significant outstanding work items as outlined in the attached punchlist letter dated
March 24, 2015 as the developer has not completed the work per the approved plan.
Based on the amount of outstanding work and the lack of progress from the developer, staff is
recommending that the cash deposit be called for the completion of the work.
Should the Public Works Committee be in favor of calling the bond for the subdivision, this
matter will then be placed on an upcoming City Council meeting agenda for further discussion
and consideration. Upon approvals, letters to the appropriate parties will be drafted and sent via
certified mail immediately.
Memorandum
To: Bart Olson, City Administrator
From: Brad Sanderson, EEI
CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir.
Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk
Date: July 15, 2015
Subject: Blackberry Woods
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
See attached memo.
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
PC #1
Tracking Number
PC 2015-14
County Case 15-13 (1211 Game Farm Road)
City Council – August 25, 2015
N/A
N/A
N/A
None.
None. Informational only.
One and a half mile review for a front yard setback variance.
Chris Heinen Community Development
Name Department
Staff Recommendation Summary:
Staff has reviewed the memorandum from Kendall County Planning and Zoning and the
subsequent documents attached. This property is located within one and a half miles of the
planning boundary for Yorkville allowing us the opportunity to review and provide comments to
Kendall County. The petition is a request for a variance to allow a garage structure within the
front yard setback. The required Kendall County setback is 50’ and the request is to reduce that
setback to 6’ from R.O.W. to accommodate the garage structure. The County has informed the
City that the petitioner has revised the location of the garage structure and will now be requesting
that the setback of 50’ be reduced to 33’ from R.O.W.
The current 2008 Yorkville Comprehensive Plan designation for this property is
Suburban Neighborhood and Parks/Open Space. After reviewing the memo from the County,
staff evaluated the petition as if it were annexed into the City under the R-1 zoning classification.
The Yorkville Zoning Code front yard setback in R-1 is 40 feet, similar to the County’s
regulation. After reviewing the County’s recommendations, city staff would be in favor of
reducing the front yard setback from 50’ to 33’. City staff would not be supportive of the current
request of adding an additional driveway and curb cut on Game Farm Road. The petitioner
currently has two curb cuts onto Game Farm Road to service the property. An additional curb
cut would be uncharacteristic of the surrounding properties and it is not in the City’s general
practice to grant more than two curb cuts for residential properties. At this time, the City staff is
not acceptable to another curb cut onto Game Farm Road.
This item was delivered to the City on July 23, 2015. This item was heard at the July 7,
2015 Kendall County Zoning, Platting & Advisory Committee (ZPAC) meeting at the County
Office Building and was scheduled for a public hearing at the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting
at the County on July 27, 2015 but the County staff requested that the item be continued to the
August 31, 2015 meeting to allow time for the City’s feedback.
Plan Commission Recommendation:
This item was discussed at the August 4, 2015 Economic Development Committee and
was in concurrence with City staff and the County’s recommendation of supporting a setback of
30 feet. This item was then discussed at the August 12, 2015 Plan Commission meeting where
the Commissioners were also in concurrence with staff regarding the setback proposed at 33 feet
from the new Game Farm Road right-of-way. However, during the meeting, the Plan
Commission expressed support of the Petitioner’s request for a third curb cut onto Game Farm
Road. While the setback variance is subject to Kendall County review and approval, as the
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Chris Heinen, Planner
CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator
Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director
Date: August 19, 2015
Subject: Kendall County Case #15-13 – Gary Kritzberg – 1211 Game
Farm Road
property is unincorporated, the requested additional curb cut onto Game Farm Road would
require issuance of a City permit by the Public Works Department. Staff will be available to
answer any questions the City Council may have regarding the County Petition.
Attachments:
1. Kendall County Planning and Zoning Memo with Attachments.
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING, BUILDING & ZONING
111 West Fox Street • Room 203
Yorkville, IL • 60560
(630) 553-4141 Fax (630) 553-4179
15-13
Gary Kritzberg
VARIANCE- Front Yard Setback for Garage
SITE INFORMATION
PETITIONER
Gary Kritzberg
ADDRESS
1211 Game Farm Road, Yorkville
LOCATION
TOWNSHIP
Bristol
PARCEL #
02-29-276-010
LOT SIZE
3.675 acres
EXITING LAND
USE
Single Family Home
ZONING
A-1 Agricultural District
LRMP
Land Use Suburban Residential
Roads Game Farm Road is currently under construction, with a 3 lane
cross section planned in front of this home
Trails A trail was recently constructed on the east side of Game Farm
Road. No sidewalk exists on the west side of the street.
ZBA Memo – Prepared by Mike Hoffman - August 4, 2015 Page 2 of 6
REQUESTED
ACTION
Request for a variance to allow a garage within the front yard setback. Required
setback is 50’, request is to reduce the setback to 33’ from R.O.W. to accommodate
the garage.
APPLICABLE
REGULATIONS
Section 5.15B – Development of Non-Conforming Lots – notes that the R2 setback
requirements apply to single family homes in the A-1 District if they were constructed
prior to the adoption of the ordinance – which is the case for this property.
Section 8.07.E. – R2 Yard Areas, which requires a 50’ front yard.
Section 13.04 – Variation procedures and requirements
SURROUNDING LAND USE
Location Adjacent Land Use Adjacent Zoning LRMP
North Single Family Residential A-1 Suburban Residential with
Natural Resource Overlay
South Single Family Residential A-1 and R3 Suburban Residential
East 3 Single Family
Residential Homes, RR
Drywall & Painting, Hillside
Nursing & Rehab
R2 and Office in Yorkville Urbanized Area (Yorkville)
West Open Space (Blackberry
Creek Flood Plain)
A-1 Suburban Residential with
Natural Resource Overlay
GENERAL
The normal building setback in the A-1 District is 100’ from the right-of-way. However, Section 5.15B of the
zoning ordinance notes that “a lot which was established in an agricultural district by recorded deed or is part
of an approved plat of subdivision, or was otherwise legally established on or before the adoption of this
amendatory ordinance, may be used for single family residence purposes provided that the yard requirements
of the R-2 District are complied with. That is the case her, so the 50’ front setback in the R-2 District is the
relevant setback.
While this property was platted to the centerline of Game Farm Road originally, the City of Yorkville recently
acquired 36’ of right-of-way in front of Mr. Kritzberg’s home to accommodate roadway improvements. The City
is nearing completion of this improvement, which includes a 3-lane cross section with curbs and a bike path on
the east side of the street. No sidewalk exists on the west side (Kritzberg) side of the street, and according to
the property owners no sidewalk is planned given topography and the fact that a wider bike path was
constructed on the east side of the street.
While originally proposed for the north side of the lot, the petioner has amended the request by shifting
the location of the proposed garage to the south side of the property. The proposed garage location is
approximately 33’ from the newly acquired Game Farm Road right-of-way, and approximately 10’ off the
southern property line. The garage door would face Game Farm Road, and would require a new curb cut. The
applicant has stated they have discussed this potential curb cut with the United City of Yorkville. While no
specific architectural plans have been provided, the property owner has described the proposed garage as a
coach house –type structure designed to blend with the existing home. The structure will be designed as a
flexible space, which can be used for indoor play activities or crafts, as well as the storage of a vehicle in winter.
The approximately size of the garage will be 14’ x 24’. No indoor plumbing of any kind is planned.
As can be seen from the air photograph, neighboring homes and garages typically have less than the 50’
setback required for this property. The home immediately to the south appears to have a 26’ setback, and
homes across the street in Yorkville have setbacks ranging from 35’ to 40’.
While a large property, steep slopes and flood plain (Blackberry Creek) on the north and west sides of the
property make much of the lot inappropriate for development. Several alternative locations have been
suggested by staff. Two of these potential locations would have avoided the need for a variation. The first is
on the south end of the property (labeled “A” on the air photo), where the existing vegetable garden is located.
However, the property owner plans to rezone and subdivide off an additional single family lot in this area in the
ZBA Memo – Prepared by Mike Hoffman - August 4, 2015 Page 3 of 6
future. As he is not sure where the home would be located, this suggested garage location could be problematic
with future improvement plans. The second option discussed is just south and east of the existing attached
garage (labeled “B” on the attached exhibit), near where the existing parking pad is located. Photographs of
this area are included below. The concern the owner has with this location is it would require removal of a
couple of nice trees and landscape, and the relocation of other existing landscape improvements (perennials
and shrubs). Per the owner, there are also buried utilities in this area including electric and cable. Staff was
unable to find any specific drawings or plans showing these utilities, but a visual inspection of utility poles in the
right-of-way and the location of connecting boxes on the house suggest that utilities do exist in this area.
A third alternative, labeled “C” on the air photo, was also suggested by staff. This location would still be within
the 50’ setback, but would require only about a 20’ variance (vs. the 38’ variance originally requested). Mr.
Kritzberg was not comfortable with this proposed location for aesthetic and dimensional reasons (he felt that
this alternative would not work well for them as it did not have sufficient depth before the slope to keep the
same garage dimensions they have proposed). This location would also require relocation of an existing
driveway light. After the July ZBA meeting, staff and Mr. Kritzberg meet on site to discuss an additional
alternative location – labeled “D” on the following page. Based on these discussions, Mr. Kritzberg has modified
his application to request a variance to allow him to build the garage in location “D”. This location meets the
side yard setback requirement of 10’. In addition, an existing row of mature evergreen trees is located along
this property line and will be preserved to provide a buffer to the adjacent home. The garage will be located 33’
from the right-of-way (a 17’ variance), and will require installation of a new drive and curb cut. This location will
be well screened from motorists traveling either south or north along Game Farm Road by existing vegetation.
The garage door will face Game Farm Road.
Site Photographs of Existing Parking Pad and Extensive
Landscaping at Southwest Corner of Garage – image on the
left is looking from in front of existing attached garage to the
southwest – image to the right is looking west along the
south driveway
ZBA Memo – Prepared by Mike Hoffman - August 4, 2015 Page 4 of 6
Site Air Photo with Topography (top) Proposed Garage Location (bottom)
D
OLD
ZBA Memo – Prepared by Mike Hoffman - August 4, 2015 Page 5 of 6
BRISTOL TWP. Staff has not received any response from the Township
YORKVILLE Since the property is generally surrounded by the City of Yorkville, the application was
provided to the City for review. It is currently scheduled to go to the Yorkville Plan
Commission on August 12th, and then to the full City Council on August 25th.
ZPAC ZPAC reviewed the case on 7/7/15 and was generally comfortable with the variance
request provided it was acceptable to the City of Yorkville.
ZBA The ZBA opened the Public Hearing on July 27th and continued their hearing until
August 31st to allow Yorkville time to provide input.
RECOMMENDATION Given the extensive landscaping on the site and screening offered by the proposed
location, coupled with the pattern of development in the area, County staff is supportive
of the proposed 17’ front yard setback variance to allow for the proposed garage. Staff
understands the applicant’s desire for a garage, and the selection of the proposed
location given site topography and other site constraints. Like ZPAC, we would give
significant wait to comments and feedback from the City of Yorkville since this property
is generally surrounded by the City. We would suggest the following conditions:
A. That evidence be provided that a curb cut onto Game Farm Road in the proposed
location will be allowed by the United City of Yorkville.
B. That the Evergreen Tree buffer along the south edge of the property be
maintained, including replacement of trees in the future as needed.
FINDINGS OF FACT
§ 13.04.2 of the Zoning Ordinance outlines findings that the Zoning Board of Appeals must make in order to
grant variations. They are listed below in italics. Staff has provided some preliminary findings in bold below
based on our recommendation to modify the request to relocate the proposed garage to location “D” as shown
on page 4 of this report and grant a 17’ variation from the required 50’ front yard setback. Depending on
additional evidence provided at the public hearing and input from the City of Yorkville, these draft findings may
need to be modified.
That the particular physical surroundings, shape, or topographical condition of the specific property involved
would result in a particular hardship or practical difficulty upon the owner if the strict letter of the regulations
were carried out. The topography of this property limits potential locations of any structure on this
property. However, the proposed provides an alternative that considers the unique character of the
property and minimizes the required variation.
That the conditions upon which the requested variation is based would not be applicable, generally, to other
property within the same zoning classification. This is a unique property within the County’s A-1 Zoning
District, as it is generally surrounded by the City of Yorkville. This location, plus the unique topographic
conditions of the property do not exist on most other A-1 zoned property in the County.
That the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the
property. Recent right-of-way acquisition by the City of Yorkville which increased the setback from the
original property line (center of the road) was not a hardship created by the owner. Likewise, the current
owner had no influence over the unique topography of the site or the placement of the home on the
property, both of which limit potential garage locations.
That the granting of the variation will not materially be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially injurious
to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located. The proposed garage
location will have a significant landscape buffer from both the adjacent home to the south and from
Game Farm Road. The proposed variation and resulting garage setback will generally be consistent
with other such structures in the area.
ZBA Memo – Prepared by Mike Hoffman - August 4, 2015 Page 6 of 6
That the proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, or
substantially increase the congestion in the public streets or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public
safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. The proposed variation
will not impact the supply of light or air to adjacent property. This proposed garage will have no impact
on traffic, as it is for a car that is currently stored outdoors on the property. Given the existing
landscape buffering and proposed construction materials that will match the existing home, the
improvements should not diminish or impair neighboring property values.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Plat of Survey
Have a question or comment about this agenda item?
Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville,
tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php
Agenda Item Summary Memo
Title:
Meeting and Date:
Synopsis:
Council Action Previously Taken:
Date of Action: Action Taken:
Item Number:
Type of Vote Required:
Council Action Requested:
Submitted by:
Agenda Item Notes:
See attached memo.
Reviewed By:
Legal
Finance
Engineer
City Administrator
Human Resources
Community Development
Police
Public Works
Parks and Recreation
Agenda Item Number
ZBA #1
Tracking Number
ZBA 2015-03
Lot 19 Commercial Drive (Lot Coverage Variance)
City Council – August 25, 2015
Majority
Vote
Request for Lot Coverage Variance approval for a public self storage facility
located at 147 Commercial Drive.
Chris Heinen Community Development
Name Department
Background & Request:
The petitioner, Terry Richards, petitioner, has filed an application with the United City of
Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting to vary the lot coverage regulations contained in
Chapter 7: Dimensional and Bulk Regulations, Section 10-7-1 of the United City of Yorkville
Zoning Ordinance, to permit the construction of a public storage facility with a lot coverage of
eighty percent (80%) which exceeds the maximum permitted lot coverage of sixty percent (60%)
in the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District. The real property is located at 147 Commercial
Drive in Yorkville, Illinois.
The petitioner is looking to construct nine (9) self storage buildings ranging from 2,000
square feet to 12,000 square feet in size and will have a total of 322 storage units. The main
entrance will be located on Commercial Drive. The petitioner is proposing five (5) parking
stalls, which includes one (1) handicapped accessible stall. The plan also indicates an additional
three (3) parking stalls for the future, if needed. The overall lot coverage, which includes
buildings and pavement, is approximately 80%. This calculation is above the maximum
permitted 60% lot coverage.
Zoning Board of Appeals Action:
The Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed the request at a public hearing held on August 5,
2015 and made the following motion:
In consideration of testimony presented during a Public Hearing on August 5, 2015
and approval of the findings of fact, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval to the
City Council of a request to vary the lot coverage regulations contained in Chapter 7:
Dimensional and Bulk Regulations, Section 10-7-1 of the United City of Yorkville Zoning
Ordinance, to permit the construction of a public storage facility with a lot coverage of eighty
percent (80%) which exceeds the maximum permitted lot coverage of sixty percent (60%) in
the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District, as presented by staff in a memorandum dated July
28, 2015.
Action Item:
Goins– aye; Johnson – aye; Marcum – aye; Olson – aye. (4-ayes, 0-nays)
Standards for Granting a Variance:
The Zoning Board of Appeals based its decision to vary the lot coverage regulations of
the Zoning Ordinance upon the following standards (Section 10-14-5C). Responses to these
standards have been provided by the applicant in the attached application and entered into the
public record:
Memorandum
To: City Council
From: Chris Heinen, Planner
CC: Bart Olson, City Administrator
Krysti J. Barksdale-Noble, Community Development Director
Date: August 18, 2015
Subject: ZBA 2015-03 – Self Storage Facility (Lot Coverage Variance) –
Lot 19 Commercial Drive
1. Because the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions
of the specific property involved, a particular hardship to the owner would result,
as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations
was carried out.
2. The conditions upon which the petition for a variation is based are unique to the
property for which the variation is sought and are not applicable, generally, to
other property within the same zoning classification.
3. The alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Title and has not been created
by any person presently having an interest in the property.
4. The granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the
property is located.
5. The proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion in the public streets, or
increase the danger to the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair
property values within the neighborhood.
Staff Comments:
The proposed variance of the property is supported by staff. Several of the properties in
the area exceed the maximum lot coverage requirements to date. The petitioner is also meeting
the maximum FAR which is more restrictive than the lot coverage. Again, staff will be
reviewing the lot coverage in all zoning districts and bring forward a text amendment to alleviate
a majority of these variance requests. Staff will be available to answer any question the City
Council may have at Tuesday night’s meeting.
Attachments:
1. Draft Ordinance.
2. Copy of Petitioner’s Application w/exhibits.
3. Copy of Public Notice.
Ordinance No. 2015-____
Page 1
Ordinance No. 2015-_____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, GRANTING A LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE FOR A
PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITIES/MINIWAREHOUSE STORAGE
(Lot 19 of Unit 3 Yorkville Business Center Subdivision)
WHEREAS, the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”) is
a duly organized and validly existing non home-rule municipality created in accordance
with the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970 and the laws of the State; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-13-5) the Mayor and
City Council of the City (the “Corporate Authorities”) may provide for and allow variances to
provide relief when strict compliance with the Yorkville Zoning Ordinance (the “Zoning
Ordinance”) creates a particular hardship; and,
WHEREAS, application ZBA 2015-03, filed by Terry Richards (the “Applicant”),
requested to construct a public storage facility with a lot coverage of eighty percent (80%) which
exceeds the maximum permitted lot coverage of sixty percent (60%) in the M-1 Limited
Manufacturing District as required by Section 10-7-1, Dimensions and Bulk Table, of the Zoning
Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing on said application was published and
pursuant to said notice the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City conducted a public hearing
on August 5, 2015, on said application in accordance with the State statutes and the
ordinances of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals made the required written
Findings of Fact finding that the variation met the standards in Section 10-4-7C of the
Zoning Ordinance and recommended that the variance be granted; and,
Ordinance No. 2015-____
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Corporate Authorities of the City of Yorkville have received and
considered the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, by the Mayor and City Council of
the City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows:
Section 1: That this Ordinance shall apply to the Subject Property commonly
known as 147 Commercial Drive and legally described as:
Lot 19 Final Plat of Subdivision Yorkville Business Center Unit 3 being a part of the west
half of Section 16 and part of the east half of Section 17, all in the Township 37 North,
Range 7 East of the Third Principal Meridian according to the plat thereof recorded May
21, 2001 as Document 200100008620 in Kendall County, Illinois,
PIN 02-17-277-003 and 02-16-153-001.
Section 2: That a variation to increase the lot coverage from sixty percent (60%) to
eighty percent (80%) is hereby granted for the Subject Property.
Section 3: That ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
hereof, are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict.
Section 4: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois this
________ day of ____________________, 2015.
______________________________
CITY CLERK
CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________
JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ LARRY KOT ________
CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________
DIANE TEELING ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________
Ordinance No. 2015-____
Page 3
Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this
________ day of ____________________, 2015.
______________________________
MAYOR
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE
THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA 2015-03
NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT Terry Richards, petitioner, has filed an
application with the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, requesting
to vary the lot coverage regulations contained in Chapter 7: Dimensional and Bulk
Regulations, Section 10-7-1 of the United City of Yorkville Zoning Ordinance, to
permit the construction of a public storage facility with a lot coverage of eighty
percent (80%) which exceeds the maximum permitted lot coverage of sixty percent
(60%) in the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District. The real property is located at
147 Commercial Drive in Yorkville, Illinois.
The legal description is as follows:
LOT 19 FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION YORKVILLE BUSINESS CENTER
UNIT 3 BEING A PART OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 16 AND PART
OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 17, ALL IN THE TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH,
RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO
THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 21, 2001 AS DOCUMENT
200100008620 IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
The application materials for the proposed Variance are on file with the City Clerk.
NOTICE IS HEREWITH GIVEN THAT the Zoning Board of Appeals for the
United City of Yorkville will conduct a public hearing on said application on
Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 7 p.m. at the United City of Yorkville, City Hall,
located at 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois 60560.
The public hearing may be continued from time to time to dates certain without
further notice being published.
All interested parties are invited to attend the public hearing and will be given an
opportunity to be heard. Any written comments should be addressed to the United
City of Yorkville City Clerk, City Hall, 800 Game Farm Road, Yorkville, Illinois,
and will be accepted up to the date of the public hearing.
By order of the Corporate Authorities of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall
County, Illinois.
BETH WARREN
City Clerk
BY: Lisa Pickering
Deputy Clerk