COW Minutes 1998 02-05-98 w
CITY OF YORKVILLE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
FEBRUARY 5, 1998
MEMBERS PRESENT: Art Prochaska, Richard Sticka, Larry Kot, Jeff Spang,
Jerry Lynch, Jim Stafford, Kathy Jones, Richard Scheffrahn, Tom Sowinski, Tony
Graff, Jim Nanninga, Dan Kramer, Joseph Wywrot, Cindy Ketcham.
PC 98-1 Schneider Annex-The planning commission and the Economic
Development committee both have approved through committee. A Public
Hearing is unnecessary, because it is a straight annexation and re-zoning. A
hearing had been scheduled for Thursday February 12 prior to the council
meeting and will still be presented as scheduled. This item will also be placed
on the agenda of 2-12.
PC 98-2 Kuney, Kendall County-This item was presented to the Planning
Commission and the Economic Development committees and approved through
both. There was a concern, though, with the looping and widening of the
roadway. A suggestion to the county will be to connect both roads to the loop.
This item will be placed on the 2-12 council agenda.
PC 98-3 Inland-Inland is requesting for the property owned by them at the comer
of Routes 34 &47 to be re-zoned. The property is currently zoned as 81, B2,
and B3. They would like to change this property to R4. Inland would maintain
part of the northern property as business with the southern part of the property
as multiple family dwelling. The discussion between the alderman showed them
supporting a zoning change to R3, but not R4. The difference is that R3 is for 5
units per acre where R4 is 8 units per acre. Inland has asked that this be placed
on the agenda for 2-12.
Sunset Annexation-There have some discussions between the owners of Sunset
and Atty. Kramer. The persons from Sunset have asked that the City of Yorkville
hold off a little longer. They feel that since the property is for sale, the
annexation of the property would slow the process of sale. The discussion from
the alderman was to force the annexation and waive the hook-up fees only.
MDT "COPS" Grant-The "Mobile Data Terminals" are being looked at contingent
upon the pricing alerts. $44,000 or 75% of the funding is from a grant. There
would be a $22 monthly fee per terminal. There would be 7 terminals. This
system would not go on-line until June or July and would be billed on the 98-99
budget. This would be with a 5 year contract at a fixed rate. There is a needed
letter of intent to enter into a contract.
December Water to be placed on the Thursday agenda.
Cimarron Ridge Unit 2 Letter of Credit has already been renewed.
Sewer Rate Study-There was a study of non-critical repairs made. There was
also a concern on the billing from the Sanitary district. It is showing a
discrepancy with the billing vs. collecting. The Sanitary district is billing the city
for 2352 where the city is only collecting on 2211 units. There was also a two
proposals for an increase on the billing. The first was a flat rate increase, the
second was a tiered rate for the cubic feet used. This information will be
discussed at the next Public Works for clarification and then be represented at
the C.O.W. on March 5.
Route 47 Countryside Parkway Signal-There was much discussion on this
project. There is the need to enter into a contract with I.D.O.T stating that the
balance of the project would be paid for by the City of Yorkville. This amount
would be approximately$60,000.00. There would also need to have the
verbiage prohibiting encroachment in the Route 47 right of way within the limits
of the project. The budget maintains that there should be $60,000.00 available
from the Motor Fuel Tax Fund. Currently there is $8,000.00. There is a need to
designate the funds that are already obligated to a project. This item will be
placed on the agenda 2-12.
Greenbriar Unit#2 Letter of Credit-The council recommends to demand payment
if the letter of credit is not renewed 30 days prior to the expiration date. This
item will be placed on the 2-12 agenda.
Greenbriar unit#3 Letter of Credit Reduction-The letter of credit should be
reduced to $84,490 as per the completion of repairs and upgrades to streets.
This item is OK to reduce and will be placed on the 2-12 agenda.
Additional Business:
On Saturday there will be a County Regional Planning Workshop. Mayor
Johnson would like someone from the council to attend.
There was some discussion on the annexation of M. Scott Miller.
There will be a Park Board Meeting on Monday 2-9.
The City Golf outing has been scheduled for May 15.
The situation for the "911" emergency cellular calling is being reviewed. There
is a hope that this situation can be resolved. There is a matter of liability that
must be resolved, possibly by a change in the legislation language.
There is a preliminary report on the Blackberry Creek Water Shed. This
information will be taken to Public Works on Monday for discussion.
A reminder of the Bowl-A-Thon on February 28.
Alderman Spang presented to the council a report that expresses his views and
opinions on building a new city facility. The report is attached at the end of the
minutes.
Respectfully submitted by Cindy Ketcham
S
1�
OP�gg 18 OUR SGT
OC_ G
s
r'
v
City of Yorkville
Report to the Mayor
City Council
Concerning Capital Improvements &
Capital Equipment for the Next 5 Years
2/5/98
Submitted By
Alderman Jeff Spang
Ward 1
Introduction
As I listen to my fellow council members, I hear rebuttals that lead me to
believe I have not done a good job of stating my position regarding a new city office
building.
I am not opposed to a new home for the Administration or Police Department of
the City of Yorkville. I am concerned because of the cost. Many of the services
provided by the City are declining because of funding shortages. I'm sure the Council
is aware that streets are not being maintained, that sewers are in critical shape, and
that Police and Public Works equipment continues to deteriorate. To provide these
services is what I feel we are here to do. I feel the priority must be shifted to these
core services before we dedicate too much of our available revenue to other projects.
As our revenue sources are limited, and in some cases already committed,
am compelled to find ways to reduce the dollar cost of the new city office just as I am
compelled to control the cost of other departments. This does not mean I don't feel
we need a new home. It only means I wish to make that new home as cost effective
as possible. With that in mind I have offered several less expensive alternatives.
The first alternative was the Historic Court House. An alderman has stated
that he feels the $300,000 estimate for rehabilitation is too low. He is sure it will cost
more. He is, however, comfortable supporting an option that is already estimated to
cost $1,300,000.
The second alternative I suggested was a complete remodeling of current
facilities along with an addition to either the Library or Beecher Center. This plan
would have cost an estimated $500,000. Another alderman has stated that he feels
that it is very important to have all city services under one roof for peak efficiency. I
agree that efficiency is important. I am not sure that the efficiency we would gain
justifies the $800,000 difference in cost. ($1,300,000 minus $500,000).
Lastly, I suggested using an existing building in our downtown area. This was
an attempt to keep costs down while at the same time investing in our downtown
revitalization. The cost of this plan would vary depending on the building but should
be between $500,000 and $700,000. A high level city official has stated that he does
not want to take a building off the tax roles. While I also feel that is important, 1
9
looked at the economics of this issue. The city receives less than $400 dollars of real
estate tax revenue per year on any downtown building (see Appendix"A"). If by using
a downtown building we lose $400 per year in real estate taxes, how many years
would we be ahead if we saved $600,000 up front? ($600,000 divided by $400 =
1,500 years)
Lastly, Alderman Prochaska was quoted as stating that he, too, once felt this
was the way to go, but has since seen the need for a new building. I, also, would like
to see a new office building that could be a center for our local government. Before I
can support that option, I ask that the Council ensure the basic needs of our service
departments are met. One never knows when unforeseen expenses will befall us. It
is in this mood that I offer the following report. The examples presented here are not
the only areas that need our attention. They are areas that are vital to our community
and in my opinion should be granted a higher priority when allocating a limited amount
of funds. Please consider this information as you determine which direction we
should go.
3
Police Department
First and foremost are our service departments needs. The Police Department
needs to replace 2 Patrol Squads per year for the next 5 years. Presently, the average
cost of a Patrol Squad including equipment is approximately $24,000. Thus, replacing 2
Patrol Squads per year for the next 5 years will cost about $240,000 or approximately
$50,000 per year.
The following two pages provide supporting evidence for implementing a
suggested 5 year plan and an explanation of desired results. This is in no way the only
option available. It is only one possible alternative. A replacement plan developed or
reviewed by the Chief of Police, the Public Safety Committee, and the Budget Officer
would be preferable.
4
City of Yorkville Police Department Equipment
Condition Report
2/5/98
Table 1
Unit Year Description Use Miles MilesNear
M1 1989 Chevrolet Caprice D.A.R.E. Car 130,000
M2 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Patrol Car 39,000 13,000
M3 1991 Chevrolet Caprice Chief's Car 114,000
M4 1992 Chevrolet Caprice COPS Car 103,000
M5 1993 Chevrolet Caprice Patrol Car 112,000 22,400
M6 1994 Chevrolet Caprice Patrol Car 77,000 19,250
M7 1993 Chevrolet Caprice Patrol Car 100,000 20,000
M8 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Patrol Car 70,000 23,333
M9 1996 Chevrolet Lumina Patrol Car 17,000 17,000
Average 19,164
Miles Per
Year Per
Patrol Car =
With the high mileage on our current patrol fleet, it is imperative that a
replacement program be started this next fiscal year and continued without disruption
for a minimum of 5 years. Table 2 shows a proposed replacement schedule that
includes increasing the fleet by two units in the fifth year of the plan. It also details the
accumulated mileage and attempts to replace all police vehicles prior to accumulating
90,000 miles.
When reading Table 2 (next page), please see that the zeros represent the
vehicles replaced and the year in which replacement takes place. Some vehicles are
moved from patrol to administration in an attempt to keep the newest and lowest mile
vehicles as patrol units.
For the purpose of the demonstration, it is assumed that patrol vehicles
accumulate 19,164 miles per year (the current average), and administrative vehicles
somewhat less.
Police Car Mileages and Replacement Schedule
Table 2
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
M1 130,000 135,000 140,000 145,000 150,000 155,000 81,500
P M2 39,000 58,164 77,328 0 19,164 38,328 57,492
M3 114,000 126,000 138,000 75,000 57,500 69,500 0
M4 103,000 108,000 113,000 118,000 57,500 62,500 67,500
P M5 112,000 0 19,164 38,328 0 19,164 38,328
P M6 77,000 96,164 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 0
P M7 100,000 0 19,164 38,328 0 19,164 38,328
P M8 70,000 89,164 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 76,656
P M9 17,000 36,164 55,328 0 19,164 38,328 57,492
P M10 0 19,164
P M11 0 19,164
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
M 1 86,500 91,500 96,500 101,500 76,656 81,656 86,656
P M2 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 76,656 0 19,164
M3 12,000 24,000 36,000 48,000 60,000 72,000 84,000
M4 72,500 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
P M5 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 76,656
P M6 19,164 38,328 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 38,328
P M7 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 76,656
P M8 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 0 19,164 38,328
P M9 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 0 19,164
P M10 38,328 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 57,492
P M11 38,328 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 57,492
P = Patrol Vehicle
Yearly Mileage Averages Used
Patrol Vehicle 19,164
Chiefs Car 12,000
Administrative (COPs & D.A.R.E.) 5,000
Note: Mileage represents approximate miles on vehicle at end of fiscal year. Zeros
indicate vehicle was replaced during fiscal year. Replacement for Patrol units is
expected to occur after vehicle reaches 80,000 miles. Some Patrol units are anticipated
to be moved to an administrative role early in order to keep the newest vehicles as
Patrol units and still reduce the mileage on Administrative cars.
6
Public Works
The average age of the Public Works Department equipment is 12 years. Much
of the equipment is worn out and in poor shape. Due to the high cost of the larger
machinery, a 5 year replacement plan may not be practical. Total replacement costs
exceed $590,000. That figure is only valid if some equipment is purchased on the used
market. A 7 year replacement plan would cost in the vicinity of$85,000 per year. This
cost would not include the needed expansion of the Public Works Garage, a cost
expected to be about $70,000 by itself. It is important to note that at the conclusion of
the 7 year plan the average age of Public Works Vehicles would be 5 years with a
maximum age of 8 years. A continuation of equipment replacement should be
considered along with adding any new equipment needed due to increased demand for
services or growth.
7
City of Yorkville Public Works Equipment
2/5/98
On Road Vehicles Approx. Replacement Cost
1997 Dodge Dakota 4 W/D $25,000
1996 International 7 Yard Dump (6 Wheeler) $65,000
1996 Dodge Ram Diesel $35,000
1990 Chevrolet 1 Ton Dump $28,000
1990 Chevrolet Caprice Classic $24,000 (Cost to Replace Police Squad)
1989 GMC % Ton Pick Up $30,000
1987 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe 1 Ton Pick $30,000
Up
1985 International 5 Yard Dump $58,000
1984 Ford 3/ Ton Pick Up $30,000
1983 International 5 Yard Dump $58,000
1980 Chevrolet C30 Step Van $30,000
1976 Chevrolet C65 5 Yard Dump $58,000
Off Road Vehicles
1993 Caterpillar 416B Backhoe $75,000
1978 John Deere 410 Backhoe $0 (Replace with used Cat 41613)
1968 Massey Ferguson MF30 Loader Tractor $20,000 (Replace with used equipment)
1945 Allis Chalmers WD45 Grader $10,000 (Replace with used equipment)
Tennant Riding Sweeper $0 (Replace with leased services)
Vibristat II Roller $15,000
Approx. Cost to Replace $591,000
Annual Cost - 5 Year Plan $118,200
Annual Cost - 7 Year Plan $84,429
Annual Cost - 10 Year Plan $59,100
City of Yorkville Public Works Equipment
Condition Report
2/5/98
On Road Vehicles
1997 Dodge Dakota 4 W/D
Nearly new, the only chore truck w/o a snow plow.
1996 International 7 Yard Dump (6 Wheeler)
Two years old, Out of Warranty, Over-all good shape, 22,200 miles, 1600
hours
1996 Dodge Ram Diesel
10,000 Miles, 1 year left on warranty, undiagnosed brake problem needs
attention
1990 Chevrolet 1 Ton Dump
Over 43,000 Miles, Over-all Good shape, Hydraulic pump system has needed
several costly repairs, same engine as pick up trucks.
1990 Chevrolet Caprice Classic
144,000 Miles, Body repainted 2 years ago, rusting badly again, engine needs
work, Engineer averages 100 Miles per day.
1989 GMC % Ton Pick Up
78,000 Miles, Some Dents, Some Rust, Front End replaced once already,
ready for another front end, Interior starting to show wear.
9
1987 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe 1 Ton Pick Up
70,000 Miles, Engine uses approximately 2 quarts of oil per week, Some Rust,
Interior fair, Seat has been replaced.
1985 International 5 Yard Dump
Dump Box is worn out, lift still works, Interior rough, Hour meter shows 8850
hours but has not worked since we owned it, Odometer broken, has not
worked since we owned it, No interior gauge lights, this truck was a used
purchase from the State of Illinois Highway Department
1984 Ford % Ton Pick Up
Spent $900 repair to fix injectors, 2 W/D, 4 spd. Manual transmission, Front
grill broken, body rusting badly, 115,000 Miles, Entire truck rough shape
1983 International 5 Yard Dump
Dump Box is worn out, will not dump, Interior rough, Hour meter shows 8850
hours but has not worked since we owned it, Odometer broken, has not
worked since we owned it, No interior gauge lights, this truck was a used
purchase from the State of Illinois Highway Department, Salt Spreader has
been welded into this truck, (Spreader is for the 6 Wheeler but dump on this
truck does not work so spreader was welded in place so we have a use for the
smaller truck)
1980 Chevrolet C30 Step Van
This truck is rusting badly, Transmission needs work, Back doors in bad
shape, safety a question, truck must be in reverse to start.
1976 Chevrolet C65 5 Yard Dump
Over-all sound mechanically, has had several expensive repairs, could not
recoup repair cost by selling.
10
Off Road Vehicles
1993 Caterpillar 416B Backhoe3,000 hours, No warranty, The only off road piece of
equipment in good running shape, Very expensive to replace, Costly to repair,
Currently doing nearly all the work.
1978 John Deere 410 Backhoe
Old machine, worn out, used only for brush pick up and emergencies, needs a
new hydraulic pump.
1968 Massey Ferguson MF30 Loader Tractor
This unit is worn out and DANGEROUS, needs engine overhaul, brakes, and
hydraulic pump repair, this is the only tractor available for mowing easements
and road ditches, we currently borrow school districts or Countryside Center's
tractor to do mowing, not worth the cost to repair.
1945 Allis Chalmers WD45 Grader
Needs electrical system repair, needs wheel and rim repair (tires won't hold
air), Manual steering and Manual blade adjustment, small grader not suitable
for road jobs, over-all poor shape
Tennant Riding Sweeper
Engine has been overhauled, brooms need replacement, Purchased used from
Countryside Shopping Center (use to sweep parking lots), Not large enough for
use as a street sweeper. Overall poor shape
Vibristat li Roller
Engine needs work, transport wheels not working correctly, Not heavy enough
for most road jobs, overall fair shape
11
Streets
Many discussions have taken place regarding a 5 year street plan without the
Council being able to agree. One thing that is fact is that the need for street
improvements is great. The planning document most often discussed includes over
$3,000,000 of street repairs needed now. Of that amount, over$1,600,000 is proposed
to come from General Fund revenue. In order to achieve that goal, regardless of which
projects are chosen or in which order, the approximate annual cost for a 5 year street
plan is $334,000. This figure does not include any cost for engineering or routine
maintenance. We can also be sure that before a 5 year plan is completed, additional
streets will need repair
1�
Table 3
Streets Identified For Improvement in 5 Year Planning Document Dated 12112/97
Street or Project Est. Cost Source
Traffic Signal - Rt.47 & Countryside Parkway $60,000 MFT
Van Emmon (Main to Rt.47) $105,000 General Fund
Beaver Street (Rt.47 to Badger Street) $105,000 MFT
Olson Street $30,000 General Fund
Walter Street $30,000 General Fund
Traffic Signal - Rt.34 & Sycamore Street $75,000 MFT
Center & Liberty Streets (Rt.47 to Liberty/Spring to Main) $125,000 General Fund
Morgan Street (Madison to Ridge) $25,000 General Fund
Adams Street (Madison to Ridge) $25,000 General Fund
South State Street (Fox to Hydraulic) $95,000 General Fund
Countryside Parkway (Rt.47 to Center Parkway) $380,000 MFT
South Main Street (Hydraulic to Madison) $35,000 General Fund
Elizabeth Street $175,000 General Fund
Walnut Street (Rt.47 to City Limit) $265,000 MFT
Colonial Parkway $125,000 General Fund
Conover Court $70,000 General Fund
Wolf & Deer Streets (Wolf to Rt.126) $380,000 MFT
Beaver Street (Badger to Deer) $125,000 General Fund
Blackberry Lane $85,000 General Fund
Blackberry Court $30,000 General Fund
Naden Court $45,000 General Fund
Palmer Court $50,000 General Fund
Dickson Court $70,000 General Fund
Center & Church Streets (Rt.47 to King/Center to Main) $40,000 General Fund
Apple Tree Court $30,000 General Fund
Countryside Parkway (Kendall to Center Parkway) $180,000 MFT
Liberty Street (Park to Spring) $110,000 General Fund
Hydraulic Avenue (Rt.47 to Adams) $245,000 General Fund
Total Projected Cost $3,115,000
Total Projected Cost - Non MFT $1,670,000
Approx. Annual Cost to Fund a 5 Year Plan W/MFT Projects $623,000
Approx. Annual Cost to Fund a 5 Year Plan W/O MFT Projects $334,000
These projections do not include any costs for maintenance
repairs or engineering associated with street reconstruction.
1�
Sanitary Sewers
The City is about to undertake a $2,300,000 Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency loan for Sanitary Sewer system repair. The plan is to use Utility Tax revenue
that normally goes into the General Fund to make the nearly $160,000 annual payment.
To replace that loss from the General Fund, it is proposed that Sewer Tap On fees then
be used to pay back the cost of the loan payment. This would take about 90 Sewer Tap
On fees per year for 20 years to replace this funding. Again, Council philosophies differ.
One fact for certain is that in the last 20 years, Sewer Tap Ons have only exceeded 90
per year five times. It can also be seen that the rate of tap on is closely related to
economic conditions. Without sustained rapid growth, this revenue can not be
recovered and would necessitate funding cuts from other areas
Additionally, less critical repairs to the Sanitary Sewer System will require an
additional $92,000 per year. At this time the Council is considering an increase in user
fees to provide this amount, but as yet has not approved it.
Sewer Tap Ons Since 1974
_._
120
100
E80
0 60
z 40
20
4
0
T T 00 00 00 00 f0 P.
T T T
Year
14
Summary
Viewing this report in its entirety begins to show the funding quandary in a
collective light. As you can see from the chart below, many areas vie for a limited
amount of funds. I am concerned that dedicating resources that are tied to economic
prosperity to debt obligations that are fixed is not fiscally responsible.
As we have done in the past, funding a department budget with variable revenue
streams has caused cuts in Capital Improvements and Capital Equipment purchases.
Should we press forward with the new city building as our first priority, or should
we first strengthen our service departments? In 1997 the Public Works Department
received 19% more funding dollars than it did in 1992. The Police Department received
an increase in funding of 102% during that same time period. What levels of funding are
appropriate?
No solution to our need for a permanent home should be selected until an overall
strategy to address all department and city needs is resolved. None of these issues
stands alone. We should not solve one without providing for the others.
Department Total Need Est. Annual Cost
Police (Squads Only) $ 240,000 $ 50,000
Public Works (Equipment) $ 591,000 $ 85,000 (7 year plan)
Public Works (Garage) $ 70,000 $ 70,000
Streets (with MFT) $3,000,000 $620,000
(without MFT) $1,600,000 $330,000
Sanitary Sewer
EPA Project $2,300,000 $160,000
Repairs $ 92,000
New Municipal Building $1,200,000 $ 94,500
is
Appendix "A"
TREASURER INQUIRY (C)1998 CIDNET Software PARCEL 05-39-154-001
CLASS: (0060) IMPROVED ANENT, J ROBERT
TOWNSHIP: KENDALL 9075 PENMIAN ROAD
MORTGAGE: YORKVILLE, IL 60560
TAXES--------------------(1)-----------------(2) --------LEGAL/ADDRESS----------
AMOUNT 3204.64 1602.32 1602.32 LT 1-1 BLK 6 BLACKS ADD
PAID BY ANENT, J ROBERT ANENT, J ROBERT CITY OF YORKVILLE
DATE PD 05113/97 08/07/97
PENALTY .00 .00 202-206 BRIDGE STREET S
SPECIAL !YORKVILL.E, IL 60560
----ASSESSMENTS---------------M15C-------------- ---------DTSTRTHUTTON----------
LAND ASSMNT: 6066 BASE 77: 27840±COUNTY 370.39
TNPRV ASSMNT: 36370 ACRES: .00 KENDALL TOWNSHIP 174.62
TOTAL_ ASSMNT: 42436 TCA CODE: KE003 FOREST PRESERVE 10.48
VET/HIE EXEMPT: 0 TAX RATE: 7.5517 SCHOOL DIST CU-115 1800.60
STATE MULT: 1.00000 TAX STAT: T CITY OF YORKVILLE 359.56
STATE EQU VAL: 42436 DRAINTAX: .00 YORKVILLE LIBRARY 67.47
OWNER OCCUPIED: 0 REAL, TAX: 3204.64 JR COLLEGE 1516 193.47
SENIOR CITIZEN: 0 BACK TAX: .00 BRISTOL-KENDALL FPD 193.08
SENIOR FREEZE: 0 *TOT TAX: 3204.64 YORKVILLE/BRISTOL SD 34.97
TAXABLE VALUE: 42436 ORG R/TAX: 3204.64
GOBACK
TREASURER INQUIRY (C)1998 CIDNET SOftware PARCEL 05-38-283-003
CLASS: (0060) IMPROVED [JACKSON, NEWKIRK & WAIN TT
TOWNSHIP: KENDALL 802 CASTLE STREET, NORTH
MORTGAGE: SANDWICH, IL 60546
TAXES--------------------(1)-----------------(2) --------LEGAL/ADDRESS----------
I
AMOUNT 2418.22 1209.11 1209.11 LT 1 & 9 BLK 1 BLACKS ADDN
PAID BY JACKSON, NEWKIRK & WJACKSON, NEWKIRK & W CITY OF YORKVILLE
DATE PD 09/09/97 09/09/97
PENALTY .00 72.55 201-203 BRIDGE STREET
SPECIAL YORKVILLE, IL 60560
4 -ASSESSMENTS---------------MISC-------------- ---------DISTRIBUTION----------
LAN0 ASSMNT: 14850 BASE 77: 16830 COUNTY 279.49
11MPRV ASSMNT: 17172 ACRES: .00 KENDA.,L TOWNSHIP 131.77,
TOTAL ASSMNT: 32022 TCA CODE: KE003 FOREST PRESERVE 7.911
VET/HIE EXEMPT: O TAX RATE: 7.5517 SCHOOL DIST CU-115 1358.73
STATE MULT: 1.00000 TAX STAT: T CITY OF YORKVILLE 271.32
STATE EQU VAL: 32022 DRAINTAX: .00 YORKVILLE LIBRARY 50.92
OWNER OCCUPIED: 0 REAL TAX: 2418.22 JR COLLEGE 1516 145.99
SENIOR CITI'ZE'N: 0 BACK TAX: .00 BRISTOL-KENDALL FPD 145.70
SENIOR FREEZE: 0 *TOT TAX: 2418.22 YORKVILLE/BRISTOL SD 26.39
TAXABLE VALUE: 32022 ORG R/TAX: 2418.22
GOBACK
(TREASURFR INQUIRY (C)1998 CIDNET Softwarn PARCEL 05-39-154-005
CLASS: (0060) IMPROVED JOHNSON, GERALD & HARLAN
TOWNSHIP: KENDALL 18015 HILLTOP ROAD
IAMOUNT MORTGAGE: YORKVILLE, IL 60560
TAXES----------------- --(1)-----------------(2) LEGAL/ADDRESS----------
2621.88 1310.94 1310.94 LT 3-2 & E PT IT 4-1 & 4-2 BLK
PAID BY JOHNSON, GERALD & HA HAROLD DICKINSON BLACKS ADDN CITY OF YORKVILLE
DA'Z'E PD 05/21/97 09/11/97
PENALTY .00 19.66 220 BRIDGE STREET, SOUTH
SPECIAL YORKVILLE, IL 60560
ASSESSMENTS---------------HISC-------------- ---------DISTRIBUTION----------
LAND ASSMNT: 5810 BASE 77: 17790 COUNTY 303.04
III-4P-R-
V ASSMNT: 28909 ACRES: .00 KENDALL TOWNSHIP 142.87
TOTAL ASSMNT: 34714 TCA CODE: KE003 FOREST PRESERVE 8.58
VET/IIIE EXEMPT: U TAX RATE: 7.5517 SCHOOL DIST CU-115 1473.16
STATE MULT: 1.000DO TAX STAT: T CITY OF YORKVILLE 294.17
STATE EQU VAL: 347191DRAINTAX: .00 YORKVILLE LIBRARY 55.20
OWNER OCCUPIED: 0 REAL TAX- 2621.88 JR COLLEGE *516 158.28
SENIOR CITIZEN: 0 BACK TAX: .00 BRISTOL-KENDALL FPD 157.97
SENIOR FREEZE: 0 *TOT TAX: 2671.88 YORKVILLE/BRISTOL SD 28.61
TAXABLE VALUE: 34719'ORG R/TAX: 2621.88
GOBACK
1 Fi
CITY OF YORRVILLE
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Date ;(�
Guests Present:
(Please print)
on
Arr A,�o�p
C
LJ
r � n
0 f'>