Loading...
COW Minutes 1998 02-05-98 w CITY OF YORKVILLE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE FEBRUARY 5, 1998 MEMBERS PRESENT: Art Prochaska, Richard Sticka, Larry Kot, Jeff Spang, Jerry Lynch, Jim Stafford, Kathy Jones, Richard Scheffrahn, Tom Sowinski, Tony Graff, Jim Nanninga, Dan Kramer, Joseph Wywrot, Cindy Ketcham. PC 98-1 Schneider Annex-The planning commission and the Economic Development committee both have approved through committee. A Public Hearing is unnecessary, because it is a straight annexation and re-zoning. A hearing had been scheduled for Thursday February 12 prior to the council meeting and will still be presented as scheduled. This item will also be placed on the agenda of 2-12. PC 98-2 Kuney, Kendall County-This item was presented to the Planning Commission and the Economic Development committees and approved through both. There was a concern, though, with the looping and widening of the roadway. A suggestion to the county will be to connect both roads to the loop. This item will be placed on the 2-12 council agenda. PC 98-3 Inland-Inland is requesting for the property owned by them at the comer of Routes 34 &47 to be re-zoned. The property is currently zoned as 81, B2, and B3. They would like to change this property to R4. Inland would maintain part of the northern property as business with the southern part of the property as multiple family dwelling. The discussion between the alderman showed them supporting a zoning change to R3, but not R4. The difference is that R3 is for 5 units per acre where R4 is 8 units per acre. Inland has asked that this be placed on the agenda for 2-12. Sunset Annexation-There have some discussions between the owners of Sunset and Atty. Kramer. The persons from Sunset have asked that the City of Yorkville hold off a little longer. They feel that since the property is for sale, the annexation of the property would slow the process of sale. The discussion from the alderman was to force the annexation and waive the hook-up fees only. MDT "COPS" Grant-The "Mobile Data Terminals" are being looked at contingent upon the pricing alerts. $44,000 or 75% of the funding is from a grant. There would be a $22 monthly fee per terminal. There would be 7 terminals. This system would not go on-line until June or July and would be billed on the 98-99 budget. This would be with a 5 year contract at a fixed rate. There is a needed letter of intent to enter into a contract. December Water to be placed on the Thursday agenda. Cimarron Ridge Unit 2 Letter of Credit has already been renewed. Sewer Rate Study-There was a study of non-critical repairs made. There was also a concern on the billing from the Sanitary district. It is showing a discrepancy with the billing vs. collecting. The Sanitary district is billing the city for 2352 where the city is only collecting on 2211 units. There was also a two proposals for an increase on the billing. The first was a flat rate increase, the second was a tiered rate for the cubic feet used. This information will be discussed at the next Public Works for clarification and then be represented at the C.O.W. on March 5. Route 47 Countryside Parkway Signal-There was much discussion on this project. There is the need to enter into a contract with I.D.O.T stating that the balance of the project would be paid for by the City of Yorkville. This amount would be approximately$60,000.00. There would also need to have the verbiage prohibiting encroachment in the Route 47 right of way within the limits of the project. The budget maintains that there should be $60,000.00 available from the Motor Fuel Tax Fund. Currently there is $8,000.00. There is a need to designate the funds that are already obligated to a project. This item will be placed on the agenda 2-12. Greenbriar Unit#2 Letter of Credit-The council recommends to demand payment if the letter of credit is not renewed 30 days prior to the expiration date. This item will be placed on the 2-12 agenda. Greenbriar unit#3 Letter of Credit Reduction-The letter of credit should be reduced to $84,490 as per the completion of repairs and upgrades to streets. This item is OK to reduce and will be placed on the 2-12 agenda. Additional Business: On Saturday there will be a County Regional Planning Workshop. Mayor Johnson would like someone from the council to attend. There was some discussion on the annexation of M. Scott Miller. There will be a Park Board Meeting on Monday 2-9. The City Golf outing has been scheduled for May 15. The situation for the "911" emergency cellular calling is being reviewed. There is a hope that this situation can be resolved. There is a matter of liability that must be resolved, possibly by a change in the legislation language. There is a preliminary report on the Blackberry Creek Water Shed. This information will be taken to Public Works on Monday for discussion. A reminder of the Bowl-A-Thon on February 28. Alderman Spang presented to the council a report that expresses his views and opinions on building a new city facility. The report is attached at the end of the minutes. Respectfully submitted by Cindy Ketcham S 1� OP�gg 18 OUR SGT OC_ G s r' v City of Yorkville Report to the Mayor City Council Concerning Capital Improvements & Capital Equipment for the Next 5 Years 2/5/98 Submitted By Alderman Jeff Spang Ward 1 Introduction As I listen to my fellow council members, I hear rebuttals that lead me to believe I have not done a good job of stating my position regarding a new city office building. I am not opposed to a new home for the Administration or Police Department of the City of Yorkville. I am concerned because of the cost. Many of the services provided by the City are declining because of funding shortages. I'm sure the Council is aware that streets are not being maintained, that sewers are in critical shape, and that Police and Public Works equipment continues to deteriorate. To provide these services is what I feel we are here to do. I feel the priority must be shifted to these core services before we dedicate too much of our available revenue to other projects. As our revenue sources are limited, and in some cases already committed, am compelled to find ways to reduce the dollar cost of the new city office just as I am compelled to control the cost of other departments. This does not mean I don't feel we need a new home. It only means I wish to make that new home as cost effective as possible. With that in mind I have offered several less expensive alternatives. The first alternative was the Historic Court House. An alderman has stated that he feels the $300,000 estimate for rehabilitation is too low. He is sure it will cost more. He is, however, comfortable supporting an option that is already estimated to cost $1,300,000. The second alternative I suggested was a complete remodeling of current facilities along with an addition to either the Library or Beecher Center. This plan would have cost an estimated $500,000. Another alderman has stated that he feels that it is very important to have all city services under one roof for peak efficiency. I agree that efficiency is important. I am not sure that the efficiency we would gain justifies the $800,000 difference in cost. ($1,300,000 minus $500,000). Lastly, I suggested using an existing building in our downtown area. This was an attempt to keep costs down while at the same time investing in our downtown revitalization. The cost of this plan would vary depending on the building but should be between $500,000 and $700,000. A high level city official has stated that he does not want to take a building off the tax roles. While I also feel that is important, 1 9 looked at the economics of this issue. The city receives less than $400 dollars of real estate tax revenue per year on any downtown building (see Appendix"A"). If by using a downtown building we lose $400 per year in real estate taxes, how many years would we be ahead if we saved $600,000 up front? ($600,000 divided by $400 = 1,500 years) Lastly, Alderman Prochaska was quoted as stating that he, too, once felt this was the way to go, but has since seen the need for a new building. I, also, would like to see a new office building that could be a center for our local government. Before I can support that option, I ask that the Council ensure the basic needs of our service departments are met. One never knows when unforeseen expenses will befall us. It is in this mood that I offer the following report. The examples presented here are not the only areas that need our attention. They are areas that are vital to our community and in my opinion should be granted a higher priority when allocating a limited amount of funds. Please consider this information as you determine which direction we should go. 3 Police Department First and foremost are our service departments needs. The Police Department needs to replace 2 Patrol Squads per year for the next 5 years. Presently, the average cost of a Patrol Squad including equipment is approximately $24,000. Thus, replacing 2 Patrol Squads per year for the next 5 years will cost about $240,000 or approximately $50,000 per year. The following two pages provide supporting evidence for implementing a suggested 5 year plan and an explanation of desired results. This is in no way the only option available. It is only one possible alternative. A replacement plan developed or reviewed by the Chief of Police, the Public Safety Committee, and the Budget Officer would be preferable. 4 City of Yorkville Police Department Equipment Condition Report 2/5/98 Table 1 Unit Year Description Use Miles MilesNear M1 1989 Chevrolet Caprice D.A.R.E. Car 130,000 M2 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Patrol Car 39,000 13,000 M3 1991 Chevrolet Caprice Chief's Car 114,000 M4 1992 Chevrolet Caprice COPS Car 103,000 M5 1993 Chevrolet Caprice Patrol Car 112,000 22,400 M6 1994 Chevrolet Caprice Patrol Car 77,000 19,250 M7 1993 Chevrolet Caprice Patrol Car 100,000 20,000 M8 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Patrol Car 70,000 23,333 M9 1996 Chevrolet Lumina Patrol Car 17,000 17,000 Average 19,164 Miles Per Year Per Patrol Car = With the high mileage on our current patrol fleet, it is imperative that a replacement program be started this next fiscal year and continued without disruption for a minimum of 5 years. Table 2 shows a proposed replacement schedule that includes increasing the fleet by two units in the fifth year of the plan. It also details the accumulated mileage and attempts to replace all police vehicles prior to accumulating 90,000 miles. When reading Table 2 (next page), please see that the zeros represent the vehicles replaced and the year in which replacement takes place. Some vehicles are moved from patrol to administration in an attempt to keep the newest and lowest mile vehicles as patrol units. For the purpose of the demonstration, it is assumed that patrol vehicles accumulate 19,164 miles per year (the current average), and administrative vehicles somewhat less. Police Car Mileages and Replacement Schedule Table 2 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 M1 130,000 135,000 140,000 145,000 150,000 155,000 81,500 P M2 39,000 58,164 77,328 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 M3 114,000 126,000 138,000 75,000 57,500 69,500 0 M4 103,000 108,000 113,000 118,000 57,500 62,500 67,500 P M5 112,000 0 19,164 38,328 0 19,164 38,328 P M6 77,000 96,164 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 0 P M7 100,000 0 19,164 38,328 0 19,164 38,328 P M8 70,000 89,164 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 76,656 P M9 17,000 36,164 55,328 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 P M10 0 19,164 P M11 0 19,164 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 M 1 86,500 91,500 96,500 101,500 76,656 81,656 86,656 P M2 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 M3 12,000 24,000 36,000 48,000 60,000 72,000 84,000 M4 72,500 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 P M5 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 76,656 P M6 19,164 38,328 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 P M7 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 76,656 P M8 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 0 19,164 38,328 P M9 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 0 19,164 P M10 38,328 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 P M11 38,328 57,492 76,656 0 19,164 38,328 57,492 P = Patrol Vehicle Yearly Mileage Averages Used Patrol Vehicle 19,164 Chiefs Car 12,000 Administrative (COPs & D.A.R.E.) 5,000 Note: Mileage represents approximate miles on vehicle at end of fiscal year. Zeros indicate vehicle was replaced during fiscal year. Replacement for Patrol units is expected to occur after vehicle reaches 80,000 miles. Some Patrol units are anticipated to be moved to an administrative role early in order to keep the newest vehicles as Patrol units and still reduce the mileage on Administrative cars. 6 Public Works The average age of the Public Works Department equipment is 12 years. Much of the equipment is worn out and in poor shape. Due to the high cost of the larger machinery, a 5 year replacement plan may not be practical. Total replacement costs exceed $590,000. That figure is only valid if some equipment is purchased on the used market. A 7 year replacement plan would cost in the vicinity of$85,000 per year. This cost would not include the needed expansion of the Public Works Garage, a cost expected to be about $70,000 by itself. It is important to note that at the conclusion of the 7 year plan the average age of Public Works Vehicles would be 5 years with a maximum age of 8 years. A continuation of equipment replacement should be considered along with adding any new equipment needed due to increased demand for services or growth. 7 City of Yorkville Public Works Equipment 2/5/98 On Road Vehicles Approx. Replacement Cost 1997 Dodge Dakota 4 W/D $25,000 1996 International 7 Yard Dump (6 Wheeler) $65,000 1996 Dodge Ram Diesel $35,000 1990 Chevrolet 1 Ton Dump $28,000 1990 Chevrolet Caprice Classic $24,000 (Cost to Replace Police Squad) 1989 GMC % Ton Pick Up $30,000 1987 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe 1 Ton Pick $30,000 Up 1985 International 5 Yard Dump $58,000 1984 Ford 3/ Ton Pick Up $30,000 1983 International 5 Yard Dump $58,000 1980 Chevrolet C30 Step Van $30,000 1976 Chevrolet C65 5 Yard Dump $58,000 Off Road Vehicles 1993 Caterpillar 416B Backhoe $75,000 1978 John Deere 410 Backhoe $0 (Replace with used Cat 41613) 1968 Massey Ferguson MF30 Loader Tractor $20,000 (Replace with used equipment) 1945 Allis Chalmers WD45 Grader $10,000 (Replace with used equipment) Tennant Riding Sweeper $0 (Replace with leased services) Vibristat II Roller $15,000 Approx. Cost to Replace $591,000 Annual Cost - 5 Year Plan $118,200 Annual Cost - 7 Year Plan $84,429 Annual Cost - 10 Year Plan $59,100 City of Yorkville Public Works Equipment Condition Report 2/5/98 On Road Vehicles 1997 Dodge Dakota 4 W/D Nearly new, the only chore truck w/o a snow plow. 1996 International 7 Yard Dump (6 Wheeler) Two years old, Out of Warranty, Over-all good shape, 22,200 miles, 1600 hours 1996 Dodge Ram Diesel 10,000 Miles, 1 year left on warranty, undiagnosed brake problem needs attention 1990 Chevrolet 1 Ton Dump Over 43,000 Miles, Over-all Good shape, Hydraulic pump system has needed several costly repairs, same engine as pick up trucks. 1990 Chevrolet Caprice Classic 144,000 Miles, Body repainted 2 years ago, rusting badly again, engine needs work, Engineer averages 100 Miles per day. 1989 GMC % Ton Pick Up 78,000 Miles, Some Dents, Some Rust, Front End replaced once already, ready for another front end, Interior starting to show wear. 9 1987 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe 1 Ton Pick Up 70,000 Miles, Engine uses approximately 2 quarts of oil per week, Some Rust, Interior fair, Seat has been replaced. 1985 International 5 Yard Dump Dump Box is worn out, lift still works, Interior rough, Hour meter shows 8850 hours but has not worked since we owned it, Odometer broken, has not worked since we owned it, No interior gauge lights, this truck was a used purchase from the State of Illinois Highway Department 1984 Ford % Ton Pick Up Spent $900 repair to fix injectors, 2 W/D, 4 spd. Manual transmission, Front grill broken, body rusting badly, 115,000 Miles, Entire truck rough shape 1983 International 5 Yard Dump Dump Box is worn out, will not dump, Interior rough, Hour meter shows 8850 hours but has not worked since we owned it, Odometer broken, has not worked since we owned it, No interior gauge lights, this truck was a used purchase from the State of Illinois Highway Department, Salt Spreader has been welded into this truck, (Spreader is for the 6 Wheeler but dump on this truck does not work so spreader was welded in place so we have a use for the smaller truck) 1980 Chevrolet C30 Step Van This truck is rusting badly, Transmission needs work, Back doors in bad shape, safety a question, truck must be in reverse to start. 1976 Chevrolet C65 5 Yard Dump Over-all sound mechanically, has had several expensive repairs, could not recoup repair cost by selling. 10 Off Road Vehicles 1993 Caterpillar 416B Backhoe3,000 hours, No warranty, The only off road piece of equipment in good running shape, Very expensive to replace, Costly to repair, Currently doing nearly all the work. 1978 John Deere 410 Backhoe Old machine, worn out, used only for brush pick up and emergencies, needs a new hydraulic pump. 1968 Massey Ferguson MF30 Loader Tractor This unit is worn out and DANGEROUS, needs engine overhaul, brakes, and hydraulic pump repair, this is the only tractor available for mowing easements and road ditches, we currently borrow school districts or Countryside Center's tractor to do mowing, not worth the cost to repair. 1945 Allis Chalmers WD45 Grader Needs electrical system repair, needs wheel and rim repair (tires won't hold air), Manual steering and Manual blade adjustment, small grader not suitable for road jobs, over-all poor shape Tennant Riding Sweeper Engine has been overhauled, brooms need replacement, Purchased used from Countryside Shopping Center (use to sweep parking lots), Not large enough for use as a street sweeper. Overall poor shape Vibristat li Roller Engine needs work, transport wheels not working correctly, Not heavy enough for most road jobs, overall fair shape 11 Streets Many discussions have taken place regarding a 5 year street plan without the Council being able to agree. One thing that is fact is that the need for street improvements is great. The planning document most often discussed includes over $3,000,000 of street repairs needed now. Of that amount, over$1,600,000 is proposed to come from General Fund revenue. In order to achieve that goal, regardless of which projects are chosen or in which order, the approximate annual cost for a 5 year street plan is $334,000. This figure does not include any cost for engineering or routine maintenance. We can also be sure that before a 5 year plan is completed, additional streets will need repair 1� Table 3 Streets Identified For Improvement in 5 Year Planning Document Dated 12112/97 Street or Project Est. Cost Source Traffic Signal - Rt.47 & Countryside Parkway $60,000 MFT Van Emmon (Main to Rt.47) $105,000 General Fund Beaver Street (Rt.47 to Badger Street) $105,000 MFT Olson Street $30,000 General Fund Walter Street $30,000 General Fund Traffic Signal - Rt.34 & Sycamore Street $75,000 MFT Center & Liberty Streets (Rt.47 to Liberty/Spring to Main) $125,000 General Fund Morgan Street (Madison to Ridge) $25,000 General Fund Adams Street (Madison to Ridge) $25,000 General Fund South State Street (Fox to Hydraulic) $95,000 General Fund Countryside Parkway (Rt.47 to Center Parkway) $380,000 MFT South Main Street (Hydraulic to Madison) $35,000 General Fund Elizabeth Street $175,000 General Fund Walnut Street (Rt.47 to City Limit) $265,000 MFT Colonial Parkway $125,000 General Fund Conover Court $70,000 General Fund Wolf & Deer Streets (Wolf to Rt.126) $380,000 MFT Beaver Street (Badger to Deer) $125,000 General Fund Blackberry Lane $85,000 General Fund Blackberry Court $30,000 General Fund Naden Court $45,000 General Fund Palmer Court $50,000 General Fund Dickson Court $70,000 General Fund Center & Church Streets (Rt.47 to King/Center to Main) $40,000 General Fund Apple Tree Court $30,000 General Fund Countryside Parkway (Kendall to Center Parkway) $180,000 MFT Liberty Street (Park to Spring) $110,000 General Fund Hydraulic Avenue (Rt.47 to Adams) $245,000 General Fund Total Projected Cost $3,115,000 Total Projected Cost - Non MFT $1,670,000 Approx. Annual Cost to Fund a 5 Year Plan W/MFT Projects $623,000 Approx. Annual Cost to Fund a 5 Year Plan W/O MFT Projects $334,000 These projections do not include any costs for maintenance repairs or engineering associated with street reconstruction. 1� Sanitary Sewers The City is about to undertake a $2,300,000 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency loan for Sanitary Sewer system repair. The plan is to use Utility Tax revenue that normally goes into the General Fund to make the nearly $160,000 annual payment. To replace that loss from the General Fund, it is proposed that Sewer Tap On fees then be used to pay back the cost of the loan payment. This would take about 90 Sewer Tap On fees per year for 20 years to replace this funding. Again, Council philosophies differ. One fact for certain is that in the last 20 years, Sewer Tap Ons have only exceeded 90 per year five times. It can also be seen that the rate of tap on is closely related to economic conditions. Without sustained rapid growth, this revenue can not be recovered and would necessitate funding cuts from other areas Additionally, less critical repairs to the Sanitary Sewer System will require an additional $92,000 per year. At this time the Council is considering an increase in user fees to provide this amount, but as yet has not approved it. Sewer Tap Ons Since 1974 _._ 120 100 E80 0 60 z 40 20 4 0 T T 00 00 00 00 f0 P. T T T Year 14 Summary Viewing this report in its entirety begins to show the funding quandary in a collective light. As you can see from the chart below, many areas vie for a limited amount of funds. I am concerned that dedicating resources that are tied to economic prosperity to debt obligations that are fixed is not fiscally responsible. As we have done in the past, funding a department budget with variable revenue streams has caused cuts in Capital Improvements and Capital Equipment purchases. Should we press forward with the new city building as our first priority, or should we first strengthen our service departments? In 1997 the Public Works Department received 19% more funding dollars than it did in 1992. The Police Department received an increase in funding of 102% during that same time period. What levels of funding are appropriate? No solution to our need for a permanent home should be selected until an overall strategy to address all department and city needs is resolved. None of these issues stands alone. We should not solve one without providing for the others. Department Total Need Est. Annual Cost Police (Squads Only) $ 240,000 $ 50,000 Public Works (Equipment) $ 591,000 $ 85,000 (7 year plan) Public Works (Garage) $ 70,000 $ 70,000 Streets (with MFT) $3,000,000 $620,000 (without MFT) $1,600,000 $330,000 Sanitary Sewer EPA Project $2,300,000 $160,000 Repairs $ 92,000 New Municipal Building $1,200,000 $ 94,500 is Appendix "A" TREASURER INQUIRY (C)1998 CIDNET Software PARCEL 05-39-154-001 CLASS: (0060) IMPROVED ANENT, J ROBERT TOWNSHIP: KENDALL 9075 PENMIAN ROAD MORTGAGE: YORKVILLE, IL 60560 TAXES--------------------(1)-----------------(2) --------LEGAL/ADDRESS---------- AMOUNT 3204.64 1602.32 1602.32 LT 1-1 BLK 6 BLACKS ADD PAID BY ANENT, J ROBERT ANENT, J ROBERT CITY OF YORKVILLE DATE PD 05113/97 08/07/97 PENALTY .00 .00 202-206 BRIDGE STREET S SPECIAL !YORKVILL.E, IL 60560 ----ASSESSMENTS---------------M15C-------------- ---------DTSTRTHUTTON---------- LAND ASSMNT: 6066 BASE 77: 27840±COUNTY 370.39 TNPRV ASSMNT: 36370 ACRES: .00 KENDALL TOWNSHIP 174.62 TOTAL_ ASSMNT: 42436 TCA CODE: KE003 FOREST PRESERVE 10.48 VET/HIE EXEMPT: 0 TAX RATE: 7.5517 SCHOOL DIST CU-115 1800.60 STATE MULT: 1.00000 TAX STAT: T CITY OF YORKVILLE 359.56 STATE EQU VAL: 42436 DRAINTAX: .00 YORKVILLE LIBRARY 67.47 OWNER OCCUPIED: 0 REAL, TAX: 3204.64 JR COLLEGE 1516 193.47 SENIOR CITIZEN: 0 BACK TAX: .00 BRISTOL-KENDALL FPD 193.08 SENIOR FREEZE: 0 *TOT TAX: 3204.64 YORKVILLE/BRISTOL SD 34.97 TAXABLE VALUE: 42436 ORG R/TAX: 3204.64 GOBACK TREASURER INQUIRY (C)1998 CIDNET SOftware PARCEL 05-38-283-003 CLASS: (0060) IMPROVED [JACKSON, NEWKIRK & WAIN TT TOWNSHIP: KENDALL 802 CASTLE STREET, NORTH MORTGAGE: SANDWICH, IL 60546 TAXES--------------------(1)-----------------(2) --------LEGAL/ADDRESS---------- I AMOUNT 2418.22 1209.11 1209.11 LT 1 & 9 BLK 1 BLACKS ADDN PAID BY JACKSON, NEWKIRK & WJACKSON, NEWKIRK & W CITY OF YORKVILLE DATE PD 09/09/97 09/09/97 PENALTY .00 72.55 201-203 BRIDGE STREET SPECIAL YORKVILLE, IL 60560 4 -ASSESSMENTS---------------MISC-------------- ---------DISTRIBUTION---------- LAN0 ASSMNT: 14850 BASE 77: 16830 COUNTY 279.49 11MPRV ASSMNT: 17172 ACRES: .00 KENDA.,L TOWNSHIP 131.77, TOTAL ASSMNT: 32022 TCA CODE: KE003 FOREST PRESERVE 7.911 VET/HIE EXEMPT: O TAX RATE: 7.5517 SCHOOL DIST CU-115 1358.73 STATE MULT: 1.00000 TAX STAT: T CITY OF YORKVILLE 271.32 STATE EQU VAL: 32022 DRAINTAX: .00 YORKVILLE LIBRARY 50.92 OWNER OCCUPIED: 0 REAL TAX: 2418.22 JR COLLEGE 1516 145.99 SENIOR CITI'ZE'N: 0 BACK TAX: .00 BRISTOL-KENDALL FPD 145.70 SENIOR FREEZE: 0 *TOT TAX: 2418.22 YORKVILLE/BRISTOL SD 26.39 TAXABLE VALUE: 32022 ORG R/TAX: 2418.22 GOBACK (TREASURFR INQUIRY (C)1998 CIDNET Softwarn PARCEL 05-39-154-005 CLASS: (0060) IMPROVED JOHNSON, GERALD & HARLAN TOWNSHIP: KENDALL 18015 HILLTOP ROAD IAMOUNT MORTGAGE: YORKVILLE, IL 60560 TAXES----------------- --(1)-----------------(2) LEGAL/ADDRESS---------- 2621.88 1310.94 1310.94 LT 3-2 & E PT IT 4-1 & 4-2 BLK PAID BY JOHNSON, GERALD & HA HAROLD DICKINSON BLACKS ADDN CITY OF YORKVILLE DA'Z'E PD 05/21/97 09/11/97 PENALTY .00 19.66 220 BRIDGE STREET, SOUTH SPECIAL YORKVILLE, IL 60560 ASSESSMENTS---------------HISC-------------- ---------DISTRIBUTION---------- LAND ASSMNT: 5810 BASE 77: 17790 COUNTY 303.04 III-4P-R- V ASSMNT: 28909 ACRES: .00 KENDALL TOWNSHIP 142.87 TOTAL ASSMNT: 34714 TCA CODE: KE003 FOREST PRESERVE 8.58 VET/IIIE EXEMPT: U TAX RATE: 7.5517 SCHOOL DIST CU-115 1473.16 STATE MULT: 1.000DO TAX STAT: T CITY OF YORKVILLE 294.17 STATE EQU VAL: 347191DRAINTAX: .00 YORKVILLE LIBRARY 55.20 OWNER OCCUPIED: 0 REAL TAX- 2621.88 JR COLLEGE *516 158.28 SENIOR CITIZEN: 0 BACK TAX: .00 BRISTOL-KENDALL FPD 157.97 SENIOR FREEZE: 0 *TOT TAX: 2671.88 YORKVILLE/BRISTOL SD 28.61 TAXABLE VALUE: 34719'ORG R/TAX: 2621.88 GOBACK 1 Fi CITY OF YORRVILLE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Date ;(� Guests Present: (Please print) on Arr A,�o�p C LJ r � n 0 f'>