Loading...
Public Works Packet 2015 12-15-15PW AGENDA PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, December 15, 2015 6:00 p.m. City Hall Conference Room Citizen Comments: Minutes for Correction/Approval: November 17, 2015 New Business: 1. PW 2015-75 Game Farm Road / Somonauk Street Improvements – Authorization No. 5 2. PW 2015-76 MFT Resolution for 2016 Road to Better Roads Program 3. PW 2015-77 Illinois Public Works Mutual Aid Network (IPWMAN) – Mutual Aid Agreement 4. PW 2015-78 Shared Services Intergovernmental Agreement Template 5. PW 2015-79 Wrigley Site Expansion – EDP (Intersection Improvements) – MFT Resolution 6. PW 2015-80 TAP Grant Old Business: 1. PW 2015-45 E-Waste Recycling 2. PW 2015-55 Route 47 Pedestrian Crossings 3. PW 2015-57 Traffic Calming Devices – Bristol Bay Elementary School Pedestrian Crossings Additional Business: 2015/2016 City Council Goals – Public Works Committee Goal Priority Staff “Countryside Infrastructure” 4 Eric Dhuse & Brad Sanderson “Vehicle Replacement” 5 Eric Dhuse “Capital Infrastructure” 7 Bart Olson & Eric Dhuse “Road Study (Update & Refresh)” 9 Eric Dhuse & Brad Sanderson “Sidewalk Plan Funding” 18 Bart Olson & Rob Fredrickson United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 Telephone: 630-553-4350 www.yorkville.il.us UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE WORKSHEET PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Tuesday, December 15, 2015 6:00 PM CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITIZEN COMMENTS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MINUTES FOR CORRECTION/APPROVAL: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. November 17, 2015 □ Approved ________ □ As presented □ With corrections --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NEW BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. PW 2015-75 Game Farm Road/Somonauk Street Improvements – Authorization No. 5 □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2015-76 MFT Resolution for 2016 Road to Better Roads Program □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2015-77 Illinois Public Works Mutual Aid Network (IPWMAN) – Mutual Aid Agreement □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. PW 2015-78 Shared Services Intergovernmental Agreement Template □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. PW 2015-79 Wrigley Site Expansion – EDP (Intersection Improvements) – MFT Resolution □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. PW 2015-80 TAP Grant □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OLD BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. CC 2015-45 E-Waste Recycling □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. PW 2015-55 Route 47 Pedestrian Crossings □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. PW 2015-57 Traffic Calming Devices – Bristol Bay Elementary School Pedestrian Crossings □ Moved forward to CC __________ consent agenda? Y N □ Approved by Committee __________ □ Bring back to Committee __________ □ Informational Item □ Notes ___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number Minutes Tracking Number Minutes of the Public Works Committee – November 17, 2015 Public Works Committee – December 15, 2015 Majority Committee Approval Minute Taker Name Department Page 1 of 4 DRAFT UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Tuesday, November 17, 2015, 6:00pm Yorkville City Hall, Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road IN ATTENDANCE: Committee Members Chairman Chris Funkhouser Alderman Ken Koch Alderman Jackie Milschewski Alderman Larry Kot (left 6:44pm.) Other City Officials City Administrator Bart Olson Public Works Director Eric Dhuse Engineer Brad Sanderson, EEI Other Guests: David Taylor, Principal BBES Terri Zub, Bristol Bay PTO President Stephanie Drew, Bristol Bay David Alphonse, Bristol Bay The meeting was called to order at 6:00pm by Chairman Chris Funkhouser. Items #2 and #3 under Old Business were moved forward on the agenda. Previous Meeting Minutes: October 20, 2015 The minutes were approved as read. Citizen Comments: None Old Business: 2. PW 2015-55 Route 47 Pedestrian Crossings (out of sequence) Mr. Sanderson said contact has been made with IDOT regarding flashing beacons and the cost is about $25,000-$30,000 to cover both sides of the road. It was suggested to wait until spring to assess pedestrian traffic. Alderman Kot expressed concern since it is now getting darker earlier and kids are walking home from school. He said people do not want to cross near the park due to the lack of lighting with only one 1ight on the SE corner. Page 2 of 4 Alderman Milschewski asked why there was a delay in installing the street lights. Installation was expected in December by IDOT, then the date was moved back to spring. The bases were installed by D Construction, however, new measurements had to be taken on the poles as part of a punchlist and it was discovered that modifications were needed. Alderman Koch asked about temporary lighting. Mr. Olson contacted IDOT on this date and this item will come back next month for discussion. 3. PW 2015-57 Traffic Calming Devices (out of sequence) a. Bristol Bay Elementary School Evaluation Traffic patterns were re-evaluated at the school and vehicles had slowed down. No other changes were recommended at this time. Mr. Sanderson recapped a memo of suggestions to enchance safety at this location. One suggestion was crossing guards. Alderman Koch asked about the cost of a twice daily crossing guard which he said are very effective. The cost would be $10-$15 hourly and Mr. Olson commented that the school would be asked for funding. Guest Dave Taylor said he appreciated the diligence and that the schools have made announcements to the public about the problems. He noted a parent group met with limited success and it could become a legal issue using volunteers. He would like to have a crossing guard at the school. Mr. Alphonse asked to have the study redone in spring when more people walk. Ms. Drew added that drivers cannot see the kids in the left turn lane. In summary, Chairman Funkhouser said the school board should be contacted, however, Mr. Olson said the school administrators have not committed any funding. b. Traffic Calming Toolbox Mr. Sanderson had been asked to assemble a package of traffic calming ideas and costs. Some of the ideas are for new construction and others are for retrofit. Chairman Funkhouser asked for a list of those ideas for retrofit. Alderman Kot said ideally the crossing guard is the best solution, but he also asked for enhanced pavement markings and rumble strips. Crossing guards are cheaper than installing a speed table. Mr. Sanderson said rumble trips presented plowing issues and motorists become accustomed to them quickly. It was also suggested to use the west school entrance for the bussses and have kids cross at the east entrance. The committee decided to pursue a crossing guard and striping, so a proposal will be brought forward next month. New Business 1. PW 2015-64 2015 Road to Better Roads (MFT) – Change Order No. 1 2. PW 2015-65 2015 Road to Better Roads Additional Work – Change Order No. 1 (The above 2 items discussed together) The bids were very favorable and the City entered into special agreements with D Construction since the original contracts used MFT and were through IDOT. These change orders are balancing--one being an increase and the other a reduction. These move to the consent agenda. 3. PW 2015-66 Game Farm Road / Somonauk Street Improvements – Authorization No. 4 Authorization No. 4 is for a sanitary sewer and entrance work at the cemetery for $13,488.06. There will also be a Change Order No. 5 for balancing for $20,000 over the contract. Mr. Sanderson recommended approval of both and they move to consent. Page 3 of 4 4. PW 2015-67 Ridge Street Water Main Improvements – Change Order No. 1 This project is nearly complete and this is a change order for a reduction of $332.89. The completion date will be changed to spring to allow the grass to grow. A sanitary sewer manhole and restoration of grass will be finished then. This moves to consent agenda. 5. PW 2015-68 Route 71 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Replacement – Engineering Agreement Mr. Sanderson said DOT asked the City to prepare documents and DOT was to provide CAD drawings, but they were not received. They also requested the City to complete the design of water main and sewer replacement. There are 2 separate contracts: Rt. 47/71 intersection and the east part of the project. DOT also requested final engineering plans from the City. The contract is about $60,000 for all engineering according to Mr. Olson. He said it is hoped that DOT will undertake the Rt. 47 portion first since the Rt. 71 portion is more expensive due to the watermain project. This item moves to the consent agenda. 6. PW 2015- 69 Appletree Court and Church Street Water Main Replacement – Engineering Agreement This is the agreement for relocation of watermain at a cost of $60,000 as part of Road to Better Roads. Mr. Sanderson noted this was a high break watermain area. The roads will also be totally reconstructed after the underground work and the project should start in May. Patching will be done if there is a temporary delay between the 2 projects. This item moves to the consent agenda. 7. PW 2015-70 Autumn Creek 2A – Acceptance of Public Improvements Pulte has requested acceptance of several units and all punchlist work is done. There will be a corresponding bond reduction. This moves to the consent agenda. 8. PW 2015-71 Route 47 ITEP (Streetlights) – Authorization No. 1 This is the authorization for the change order. It was discovered that a couple items were missing in the lighting control. Approval is recommended for the additional costs of $2,112.64 which will be covered with 80% federal funds. This was due to the addition of bridge lights. This will move to the consent agenda. 9. PW 2015-72 Capital Project Update Mr. Sanderson updated the committee on capital improvement projects and will do so on a quarterly basis. He said Game Farm Road is mostly complete. The ITEP project is almost complete and Ms. Milschewski asked if the City chose to stop lighting near the theater as it is very dark there. The City hopes there will be a full stoplight near the theater and Aldi in the future. The remainder of the projects were: Ridge Street, landscaping done at Raintree, well #8 will be scheduled for a pre-construction meeting soon, Sunflower/Greenbriar pond plantings finished, planning underway for Mill Rd. and Kennedy Rd., Mill St. scheduled for March letting, Road to Better Roads field work done and Countryside project scheduled for February letting. Alderman Funkhouser asked that the City keep the Countryside residents well-informed. Public Works Director Dhuse reported that all sewer lines in Countryside were televised for potential problems, at a cost of $24,000 after obtaining 3 quotes and adding some extra work. Page 4 of 4 10. PW 2015-73 Roue 34 – West Section Medians The Rt. 34 project is planned without landscaped medians. Chairman Funkhouser said he prefers not to have concrete medians where not needed, but to have landscaping instead. Ms. Milschewski expressed concern for safety while doing maintenance. According to Mr. Dhuse said there is new technology that uses remote control mowers. Another option is to hire an outside company. Other materials besides grass could also be used for less maintenance. When landscaping is used, it becomes a local responsibility. Mr. Funkhouser said he would like to ask IDOT for landscaping. Mr. Koch said he wants to see costs prior to a decision and Mr. Sanderson will contact the project manager. If a quick response is received from IDOT, this item will be placed on the Council agenda, otherwise it will come back to committee. 11. PW 2015-74 Mowing and Maintenance of Public Parkways Chairman Funkhouser asked how the City can reduce costs and maintenance obligations due to homeowners not mowing or for unimproved areas. Mr. Dhuse said ditches are mowed 3 times a years and mowers were purchased to take care of this. According to Mr. Olson some of those owners are responsible to maintain and the question is how to proceed. He will take this matter back to staff to examine the ordinance as owners can be fined. This item will be brought back to committee in December. Old Business 1. PW 2015-45 E-Waste Recycling Mr. Dhuse was contacted by a representative from a recycling firm and he informed the rep that the City would be interested in recycling events 3 times a year. He also requested costs. Mr. Olson added that he will be participating in a conference call with IEPA on December 2 to discuss problems related to recycling, hauling, businesses, municipalities etc. This will be brought back next month. Additional Business: Alderman Milschewski noted that the downtown railings and light pole by Old Second building were hit. Costs of repair or replacement will be determined and may be charged to the responsible party or possibly turned into the insurance company A bollard will be installed near the light pole mast arm. Ms. Milschewski said the sidewak near her neighbor is still not repaired, however, Mr. Dhuse said the neighbor is responsible for that. She also thanked him for the sidewalk repair for another resident. Chairman Funkhouser discussed the tree stumps in the Somonauk St./Rt. 47 area and asked whose responsibility it was to remove. Mr. Dhuse will research. There was no further business and the meeting was adjourned at 7:33pm. Minutes respectfully transcribed by Marlys Young, Minute Taker Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number NB #1 Tracking Number PW 2015-75 Game Farm Road and Somonauk Street Improvements Public Works Committee – December 15, 2015 Consideration of Approval Consideration of Authorization No. 5 Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department The purpose of this memo is to present Authorization No. 5 for the above referenced project. An authorization, as defined by IDOT, is the written approval of a contract change and the written directive to the contractor to perform said work. By this definition, it alters the contract work from that awarded under the competitive bidding process. An Authorization of Contract Changes signed by the Regional Engineer signifies completed review of and support for the change proposed. Background: The State of Illinois and Geneva Construction Co. entered into an agreement for a contract value of $3,768,467.60 for the above referenced project. Construction began on March 5, 2015 and is substantially complete. The construction costs are being funded by STP funds (federal) and local funds. The maximum federal participation amount is $2,343,512.00, inclusive of all change orders (authorizations) associated with this contract. Questions Presented: Should the City approve Authorization No. 5 in the amount of $(151,121.93)? Discussion: Authorization No. 5 is the final balancing authorization that addresses the project line items. Line item quantities are estimated during the design of the project and adjusted during construction. We anticipate that this will be the final balancing authorization. The net change to date for authorizations is $53,434.34, which is a 1.42% increase to the original contract value bringing a revised contract value to date of $3,821,901.94. We have attached IDOT form BC-22 for Authorization No. 5 for your information. All authorizations have a pre-approval from the IDOT District 3 Local Agency Bureau of Construction Engineer. We are recommending approval of the Authorization. Action Required: Consideration of approval from the City Council for Authorization No. 5. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: December 4, 2015 Subject: Game Farm Road –Somonauk Street Improvements – AuthorizationNo. 5 Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number NB #2 Tracking Number PW 2015-76 2016 RTBR Program Public Works Committee – December 15, 2015 Consideration of Approval MFT Resolution Consideration Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department In accordance with the planned budget and Roads to Better Roads Program, we are proceeding with next year’s project. The budgeted MFT portion of the Roads to Better Roads Program is $300,000. Since MFT funds are being utilized to fund a portion of the project, IDOT requires the passing of a resolution to appropriate the funds. Accordingly, please see the attached Appropriation Resolution in the amount of $300,000 and a project location map for your reference. We are currently targeting a March 7th letting and will submit the complete set of construction documents after City Council approval of the Resolution at their January 12th meeting. If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: December 2, 2015 Subject: 2016 Roads to Better Roads Program Printed 12/2/2015 BLR 14230 (Rev. 07/15/13) Resolution for Maintenance of Streets and Highways by Municipality Under the Illinois Highway Code BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the (Council or President and Board of Trustees) United City of Yorkville , Illinois, that there is hereby (City, Town or Village) (Name) appropriated the sum of $300,000.00 of Motor Fuel Tax funds for the purpose of maintaining streets and highways under the applicable provisions of the Illinois Highway Code from May 1, 2016 (Date) to April 30, 2017 . (Date) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that only those streets, highways, and operations as listed and described on the approved Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs, including supplemental or revised estimates approved in connection with this resolution, are eligible for maintenance with Motor Fuel Tax funds during the period as specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall, as soon a practicable after the close of the period as given above, submit to the Department of Transportation, on forms furnished by said Department , a certified statement showing expenditures from and balances remaining in the account(s) for this period; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall immediately transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the district office of the Department of Transportation, at Ottawa , Illinois. I, Beth Warren Clerk in and for the United City (City, Town or Village) of Yorkville , County of Kendall hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the Council at a meeting on January 12, 2016 (Council or President and Board of Trustees) Date IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 12th day of January, 2016 . (SEAL) City Clerk (City, Town or Village) Approved Regional Engineer Department of Transportation Date Bridge River Veterans Cannonball Faxon Main Spring Beecher Corneils Van Emmon John Kennedy Center Park McHugh Alice Somonauk Erica Edward Alan Dale Countryside Teri Omaha Kendall Game Farm Freemont Boombah Walnut Sumac Elm King Liberty Wac ker Mill He a r t l a n d Ha y d e n Western Isabel Jackson Sunset Ryan Bristol Fairhaven Bruell Blackberry Shore Marketview Carly E l d e n Northland Lauren Church West McMurtrie Kate Bl u e s t em Grace Qui n s ey Pleasure Madison Hunt S y c a m o r e Twinleaf Colton High Ridge Purcell Leisure P o p l a r Prairie Redbud Iroquois Caledonia Landmark Canyon Sta te Morgan Oak Cross Hillcrest Conover Boomer Tuma Heustis Cottonwood North Cr i ms o n Homestead Hunter Lexington Arrowhead W i l d I n d i g o Eve r gree n Aspen Gawne Nathan Taus Commercial Goldenrod Jonathan Georgeanna Marketplace W h i t e O a k Ridge Pinewood Wi nterber r y Independence P r a i r i e R o s e Christy Swanson Longview Catalpa Strawberry Gillespie Red Tail Hickory Woodworth Di c k s o n Prairie Pointe Worsley River Birch Hydraulic An d r e a Auburn P a t r i c i a Chestnut Sanders Cornell Oakwood Tower Behrens Wi ndham Naden Stony Creek Spruce P a l m e r A m a n d a D o v e r Cody Birchwood Johns on Mulhern C o n c o r d Bl a c k b e r r y Victoria Mistwood Cypress No rton Powers Appletree Haley E s s e x Jefferson Ches hi r e Heritage Faxon McHugh John West Main Ridge Main Center Beecher McHugh Main Hydraulic Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 (630) 466-6700 YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT 2016 EXHIBIT D LOCATION MAP www.eeiweb.com DATE: PROJECT NO.: FILE: PATH: BY: August 2016 YO1518 YO1518_Location.mxd.MXD H:\GIS\PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2015\ KKP ³ Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number NB #3 Tracking Number PW 2015-77 Illinois Public Works Mutual Aid Network (IPWMAN) – Mutual Aid Agreement Public Works Committee – December 15, 2015 Positive Approval Illinois Public Works Mutual Aid Network Agreement for Yorkville to be included in the network to assist other municipal agencies when needed Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Background In the early 2000’s, we were part of the Illinois Public Works Mutual Aid Network (IPWMAN). This network is set up for public works departments throughout the State of Illinois that are willing and able to lend assistance to other agencies that are experiencing some type of disaster. During the down turn in the economy in the mid 2000’s, we opted to drop out of the network to save the $125/yr membership dues. Now, I would like us to rejoin the network so we can help when and where we are needed. If we were included in this network, we would have been called this year to assist with the cleanup from the tornado in Coal City. I would like to be able to help communities in need; it was very frustrating that we did not get called to help. I know we could have contributed to help them get back on line and to help the residents get back to a normal life. Currently IPWMAN has 239 agencies statewide that are members (list attached). Included in that list are local agencies such as Aurora, Batavia, Oswego, St. Charles, Somonauk and North Aurora. IPWMAN also has regular board meetings and a conference once a year to get together and discuss issues, listen to speakers and look at new equipment. Action Items  Does Yorkville want to be part of this mutual aid network?  Should Yorkville join IPWMAN at a cost of $250/year? The increase in price over the prior membership is due to our increase in population since we were last a member. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works CC: Bart Olson, Administrator Date: December 1, 2015 Subject: IPWMAN agreement Recommendation I would recommend joining the mutual aid network. It is a comforting feeling, in my position, to know that if a disaster were to happen in Yorkville, I have this network to turn to for help. This network has a vast array of resources and quality manpower that I would be able to draw from in a very short time and I would not have to train them or provide constant supervision. This would allow me to concentrate on big picture items and coordinate the efforts to assist in getting the City back up and running. I would also like to be part of this network to be able to share our resources and manpower with others in need. We have a well trained staff that is equipped with good equipment and are more than capable to assist others in their time of need. I would ask that this be placed on the December 15th, 2015 public works committee agenda for discussion. If you have any questions or need further information, please let me know. Ordinance No. 2016-___ Page 1 Ordinance No. 2016-____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE ILLINIOIS PUBLIC WORKS MUTUAL AID NETWORK AGREEMENT (IPWMAN) WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Illinois, 1970, Article VII, Section 10, authorizes units of local government to contract or otherwise associate among themselves in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and, WHEREAS, the “Intergovernmental Cooperation Act”, 5 ILCS 220/1 et seq., provides that any power or powers, privileges or authority exercised or which may be exercised by a unit of local government may be exercised and enjoyed jointly with any other unit of local government; and, WHEREAS, Section 5 of the “Intergovernmental Cooperation Act”, 5 ILCS 220/5, provides that any one or more public agencies may contract with any one or more public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the contract is authorized by law to perform, provided that such contract shall be authorized by the governing body of each party to the contract; and, WHEREAS, the Mayor and the City Council of the United City of Yorkville have determined that it is in the best interests of the United City of Yorkville and its residents to enter into an intergovernmental agreement to secure to each the benefits of mutual aid in public works and the protection of life and property from an emergency or disaster and to provide for public works assistance, training and other necessary functions to further the response and recovery from said emergency or disaster. The principal objective of the public works mutual aid assistance being the response to and recovery from any emergency or disaster and the return of the community to as near normal as quickly as possible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, as follows: Ordinance No. 2016-___ Page 2 Section 1: That the Mayor and the City Clerk be and are hereby authorized to execute an Agreement for participation in the Illinois Public Works Mutual Aid Network (IPWMAN), a copy of said Agreement being attached hereto and being made a part hereof. Section 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this ____ day of _________________, A.D. 2016. ______________________________ CITY CLERK CARLO COLOSIMO ________ KEN KOCH ________ JACKIE MILSCHEWSKI ________ LARRY KOT ________ CHRIS FUNKHOUSER ________ JOEL FRIEDERS ________ DIANE TEELING ________ SEAVER TARULIS ________ Approved by me, as Mayor of the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, this _____ day of _________________, A.D. 2016. ____________________________________ MAYOR Attest: ______________________________ CITY CLERK 1 of 3 revised 8/15/08 Exhibit A1 DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (List 3 people/agency) Agency: United City of Yorkville Name:Gary Golinski Title: Mayor Office Address: 800 Game Farm Rd City/State/Zip: Yorkville, IL 60560 Office Phone: 630-553-4350 Cell Phone: Home Phone: na Office Fax: 1-630-553-7575 Cell Phone Carrier (to receive emergency notifications): Verizon Email:ggolinski@comcast.net Check all that apply:  Water  Wastewater  Sanitary District X Village/Town/City  Township  County 2 of 3 revised 8/15/08 Exhibit A2 DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (List 3 people/agency) Agency: United City of Yorkville Name: Bart Olson Title: City Administrator Office Address: 800 Game Farm Rd City/State/Zip: Yorkville, IL 60560 Office Phone: 1-630-553-4350 Cell Phone: Home Phone: NA Office Fax: 1-630-553-7575 Cell Phone Carrier (to receive emergency notifications): Verizon Email: bolson@yorkville.il.us Check all that apply:  Water  Wastewater  Sanitary District X Village/Town/City  Township  County Exhibit A3 3 of 3 revised 8/15/08 DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE (List 3 people/agency) Agency: United City of Yorkville Name: Eric Dhuse Title: Director of Public Works Office Address: 610 Tower Ln City/State/Zip: Yorkville, IL 60560 Office Phone: 1-630-553-4349 Cell Phone: Home Phone: Office Fax: 1-630-553-4377 Cell Phone Carrier (to receive emergency notifications):Verizon and AT&T Email: edhuse@yorkville.il.us Check all that apply: X Water X Wastewater  Sanitary District X Village/Town/City  Township Highway Department  County Highway Department Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number NB #4 Tracking Number PW 2015-78 Shared Services agreement template Public Works Committee – December 15, 2015 Positive Approval of Template. Final approval of agreements must be brought forth for Council Approval Template for possible shared services agreements with Oswego, Montgomery, Sugar Grove, and Kendall County Highway Department Eric Dhuse Public Works Name Department Summary Review of a proposal to share Public Works resources with Oswego and Montgomery. Background One of the outcomes of the CMAP Shared Services Study was in-depth dialogue between Public Works Directors in each town about ways they can share assets and resources. Each town has their own specialized equipment and staff knowledge that can be used to the benefit of the other towns. In order to authorize the use of staff and equipment outside of the City’s jurisdiction, an intergovernmental agreement should be approved by each town. The City just approved an intergovernmental agreement with Kendall Township in June 2015 that covered a similar sharing of services. We would propose to do a similar intergovernmental agreement with Oswego and Montgomery. We would like to leave the scope relatively open ended and participation discretionary for each town. This would encourage staff to try different arrangements to see what works and what does not work. I would envision a quarterly or semi-annual report back to City Council on what services and resources have been allocated and where they’ve been allocated. Oswego and Montgomery have not yet reviewed the form of this document, and I would expect both towns to have substantial changes to the form and content. We are providing the draft document to the committee so they can see our thought process as it relates to the first step of the shared services agreement. Recommendation Staff seeks feedback on the agreement and the concept of shared services. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: December 10, 2015 Subject: Shared Services Intergovernmental Agreement Background Earlier this year the City, along with other surrounding communities, took part in shared services workshops with CMAP to see if developing shared services would be beneficial for the municipalities. In the Public Works area, we mainly talked about the sharing of contracts for things such as fuel, purchasing, mosquito abatement, mowing, repair and maintenance to vehicles along with other services we all provide our residents. In order for this to come to fruition, we will need to have shared service agreements with the other agencies that will allow us to perform the various services and be legally protected. The Council approved a similar agreement with Kendall Township this past summer which allows us to work with them on roads and adjacent right of ways that we mutually share. This document is a template; any formal agreement will be brought back through the proper meetings for approval. Action Items Do we want to approve this template and potentially enter into agreements with surrounding agencies for shared services? Recommendation Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works CC: Bart Olson, Administrator Date: December 1, 2015 Subject: Shared services template My recommendation is to approve this template. This will allow staff to start working with the surrounding government agencies to refine the template as needed to come to an agreement with each one. Those agreements would then be brought through the approval process for a City Council vote. It is my belief that these types of agreements are very beneficial to us and to the surrounding communities. It adds another resource and specialty equipment to our toolbox that may allow us to perform a task without purchasing or renting equipment. By being able to work with other agencies we will be able to combine some of our efforts and perform the work much more efficiently and cost effectively for both agencies. If you have any questions or need further information, please let me know. Page 1 of 8    AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE SHARING OF PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES BETWEEN THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE AND THE VILLAGETHE VILLAGE OF ___________ THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (“the “Agreement”) by and between the Village of ________, Kendall County, Illinois (the “Village”) a municipal corporation of the State of Illinois and the United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois (the “City”) a municipal corporation of the State of Illinois, entered into this ____ day of ________________, 2016. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970, Article VII, Section 10, provides that units of local government may contract or otherwise associate among themselves to obtain or share services and to exercise, combine, or transfer any power or function in any manner not prohibited by law or by ordinance and may use their credit, revenues, and other resources to pay costs related to intergovernmental activities; and WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, 5 ILCS 220/5, (the “Act”) provides that units of local government are authorized to perform any governmental service activity or undertaking or to combine, transfer or exercise ay powers, functions, privileges, or authority which any of the public agencies entering into the contract is authorized by law to perform except where specifically and expressly prohibited by law; and, WHEREAS, the City and the Village have reviewed the infrastructure and assets under the maintenance responsibilities of the Public Works Department of the City and Village within each of their respective jurisdictions and have determined that the citizens and taxpayers of the City and the Village would be better served if certain maintenance of the iInfrastructure and property owned or under the jurisdiction of the City and Village (“Municipal Property”)adjacent Page 2 of 8    areas be performed by the Public Works Ddepartment that is best equipped or available to perform certain tasks, thereby saving time and resources and permitting immediate attention to the needed maintenance or repair; and, WHEREAS, the essential goal of this Agreement is that the City and the Village cooperate with each other for the sharing of services to roadways and Municipal Propertyadjacent areas such as mowing, sweeping, snowplowing, jetting, leaf collection and other maintenance tasks thereby reducing the time and cost associated with said services, all as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the the mutual proemises, obligations and undertakings and the mutual covenants hereafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: Section 1. The foregoing preambles are hereby incorporated into this Agreement as if fully restated in this Section 1. Section 2. The City hereby designates the Director of Public Works to coordinate with the Village’s __________ designee, on an “as needed” basis, the service required to certain infrastructure or Municipal Propertyassets such as mowing, snowplowing, jetting, leaf collection or other maintenance and jointly determine whether the City’s public works employees or the crew working under the Village is available or better able to provide the needed service. The Village’s ___________ designee and the Director of Public Works shall provide such needed services as agreed and advise each other of the date and time such services are to be provided and when completed. In the event either the City or the Village are unable to assist at any given time, all services to the roadway and Municipal Propertyadjacent area shall remainbe the responsibility of the unit of government (City or Village) having jurisdiction over such roadway and Municipal Property andadjacent area. In other words, this Agreement does not Page 3 of 8    reduce, eliminate or transfer the responsibility of the City or the Village to repair and maintain roadways and Municipal Propertyadjacent areas within their respective jurisdictions. A monthly report shall be prepared by the Village and City and forwarded to the other of the numbers of hours that employees of the Village or City worked within the other’s jurisdiction and equipment and supplies that were used. Section 3. The City shall not charge the Village any fee for any of the services provided to areas outside its boundaries but within the boundaries of Village and theand the Village shall not charge the City any fee any of the services provided by the Village within the City’s boundaries. Section 4. The City and the Village shall each defend, with counsel of the other party’s own choosing, indemnify and hold harmless the other party, including past, present and future board members, elected officials, insurers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, obligations, losses, penalties, fines, damages, and expenses and costs relating thereto, including but not limited to attorneys’ fees and other legal expenses, which the other party, its past, present and future board members, elected officials, insurers, employees, and/or agents may hereafter sustain, incur or be required to pay relating to or arising in any manner out of the services to be performed by the other party under this Agreement. Section 5. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to change or alter the jurisdiction of either the City or VillageCounty in any respect, including, their respective powers and duties. Section 6. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder may not be assigned (except by operation of law), and the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall inure Page 4 of 8    to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective successors and assigns of the units of government as the parties hereto. Section 7. This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced under the laws of the State of Illinois. Any legal proceeding related to enforcement of this Agreement shall be brought in the Circuit Court of Kendall County, Illinois. In case any provision of this Agreement shall be declared and/or found invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall, to the extent possible, be modified by the court in such manner as to be valid, legal and enforceable so as to most nearly retain the intent of the parties, and, if such modification is not possible, such provision shall be severed from this Agreement, and in either case the validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. Section 8. All notices required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and may be given by (a) depositing the same in the United States mail, addressed to the party to be notified, postage prepaid and certified with the return receipt requested, (b) delivering the same in person, or (c) telecopying the same with electronic confirmation of receipt If to the Village: If to the City: Director of Public Works United City of Yorkville  800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, Illinois 60560 FAX: _____________ With a copy to : Kathleen Field Orr Kathleen Field Orr & Associates 53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 964 Chicago, Illinois 60604 Page 5 of 8    Or any such other person, counsel or address as any party hereto shall specify pursuant to this Section from time to time. Section 9. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and both of which shall constitute one and the same Agreement. Section 10. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties and there are no other promises or conditions in any other agreement whether oral or written. Except as stated herein, this agreement supersedes any other prior written or oral agreements between the parties and may not be further modified except in writing acknowledged by both parties. Section 11. Nothing contained in this Agreement, nor any act of the Village or the City pursuant to this Agreement, shall be deemed or construed by any of the parties hereto or by third persons, to create any relationship of third party beneficiary, principal, agent, limited or general partnership, joint venture, or any association or relationship involving Village and the City. Further, nothing in this Agreement should be interpreted to give the Village or City any control over the other’s employees or imply a power to direct the employees of the other government body, which neither entity may exercise. Section 12. When performing pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the Village and City intend that any injuries to their respective employees shall be covered and handled exclusively by their jurisdiction’s own worker’s compensation insurance in place at the time of such injury.  It is further agreed that all employee benefits, wage and disability payments, pension and worker’s compensation claims, damage to or destruction of equipment, facilities, clothing and related medical expenses of the City or Village and their respective employees, Page 6 of 8    which may result from their activities under this Agreement, shall be the responsibility of the jurisdiction which employs the employee making such a claim. Section 13. The Parties will obtain and continue in force, during the term of this Agreement, all insurance as set forth below. Each insurance policy shall not be cancelled or changed without thirty (30) days prior written notice, given by the respective insurance carrier(s) to the VillageKendall County and the City at the address set forth herein. Before starting inspections hereunder, tThe parties shall obtain the following insurance at a minimum: (a) Worker’s Compensation and Occupational Disease Disability insurance, in compliance with the laws of the jurisdiction where the work is being performed, (b) Employer’s comprehensive general liability insurance for both personal injury and property damage in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 for each accident, (c) Comprehensive business automobile liability insurance in the minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit, (d) Comprehensive excess liability insurance with a combined minimum single limit of $1,000,000 for each occurrence, with a minimum $1,000,000 aggregate. Certificates of such insurance detailing the coverage therein shall be available to the other party upon execution of this Agreement. Neither party waives its immunities or defenses, whether statutory nor common law by reason of the indemnification and insurance provisions contained in this Agreement. Section 14. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period of three (3) years from the date of the last signature below, and may be renewed upon agreement of the parties in writing; provided however, either party may terminate this Agreement by providing thirty (30) calendar days’ advance written notice to the other party. Section 15. This Agreement may be amended only with written consent of bothall parties hereto. Page 7 of 8    Section 16. The Village and the City each hereby warrant and represent that their respective signatures set forth below have been, and are on the date of this Agreement, duly authorized by all necessary and appropriate corporate and/or governmental action to execute this Agreement. Page 8 of 8    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers on the above date at Yorkville, Illinois. United City of Yorkville, Kendall County, Illinois, a municipal corporation By: __________________________________ Mayor Attest: _______________________________ City Clerk By: ___________________________________ Village President Village of ____________, Kendall County, Illinois, a municipal corporation Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Agenda Item Number NB #5 Tracking Number PW 2015-79 Wrigley EDP (Intersection Improvements) Public Works Committee – December 15, 2015 Consideration of Approval MFT Resolution Consideration Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department As you know, the City and Wrigley were awarded EDP funds for the intersection improvements. The agreement (See attached) states that the project is to be processed in accordance with MFT guidelines. Accordingly, IDOT requires the passing of a resolution to appropriate the funds. Please see the attached Appropriation Resolution in the amount of $707,138 for review and consideration. We are currently targeting a late winter/early spring letting with construction taking place in the 2016 construction season. If you have any questions or require additional information, please let us know. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Dir. Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: December 3, 2015 Subject: Wrigley Site Expansion –EDP (Intersection Improvements) Printed 12/4/2015 BLR 14230 (Rev. 07/15/13) Resolution for Maintenance of Streets and Highways by Municipality Under the Illinois Highway Code BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the (Council or President and Board of Trustees) United City of Yorkville , Illinois, that there is hereby (City, Town or Village) (Name) appropriated the sum of $707,138.00 of Motor Fuel Tax funds for the purpose of maintaining streets and highways under the applicable provisions of the Illinois Highway Code from May 1, 2015 (Date) to April 30, 2017 . (Date) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that only those streets, highways, and operations as listed and described on the approved Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs, including supplemental or revised estimates approved in connection with this resolution, are eligible for maintenance with Motor Fuel Tax funds during the period as specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall, as soon a practicable after the close of the period as given above, submit to the Department of Transportation, on forms furnished by said Department , a certified statement showing expenditures from and balances remaining in the account(s) for this period; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall immediately transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the district office of the Department of Transportation, at Ottawa , Illinois. I, Beth Warren Clerk in and for the United City (City, Town or Village) of Yorkville , County of Kendall hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the Council at a meeting on January 12, 2016 (Council or President and Board of Trustees) Date IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 12th day of January, 2016 . (SEAL) City Clerk (City, Town or Village) Approved Regional Engineer Department of Transportation Date Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number NB #6 Tracking Number PW 2015-80 TAP Grant Public Works Committee – December 15, 2015 Update on the TAP Grant Application Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Update on the 2015 Kendall County TAP grant program. Background This item was last discussed at the Public Works Committee meeting in November 2014. At that meeting, the committee was advised that the City had been successful in securing a $5,000 TAP grant for our Route 47 sidewalk/trail installation and that the City would apply for $5,000 in the 2015 TAP grant program. The City’s 2015 application was successful as well. Kendall County has indicated they would be willing to consider an application each year of our payback on the Route 47 project, and encouraged us to resubmit this year. There was some discussion during last year’s grant review that the County might consider a City application for the remainder of funding up to the grant maximum of $50,000. As part of this year’s request, we plan on submitting for the $5,000 annual amount but also requesting a one-time (and final) award of $35,000. Applications are due by December 31st. City Council approval is not required as part of the grant approval process. Staff will submit an application to Kendall County prior to the deadline, unless directed otherwise by the Committee. Recommendation This is an informational item. Memorandum To: Public Works Committee From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: December 10, 2015 Subject: TAP Grant Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number OB #1 Tracking Number PW 2015-45 E-Waste Recycling Public Works Committee – December 15, 2015 Bart Olson Administration Name Department Summary Review of a proposal to conduct a semi-annual e-waste recycling pickup. Background This item was last discussed at the November Public Works Committee meeting. At that meeting, the committee was informed of the difficulty in receiving quotes from vendors to conduct a pickup. We have finally received a firm quote back from Com2 Recycling of $75/pallet for a pickup day. This price reflects what the City had been paying for the final several months of our partnership with Com2, before we had switched over to New Life Recycling. While New Life Recycling was somewhat cheaper than $75/pallet last year, they had issues with sporadic collections and eventually stopped collections in full. We feel $75/pallet is reasonable if the City can control the use of the service to City residents only and limit the potential for fly-dumping. We are still working through the details, but our initial thoughts are to secure a pickup date with Com2 and communicate this date to the residents. The date would likely be on a weekend, would be staffed by City employees to both assist residents in the movement of the waste from their vehicles to the pallet and to verify City residency, and would be located in an area with overnight surveillance to prevent fly-dumping. We think there would be enough use by the residents to fill 10-20 pallets worth of e-waste, which would have a direct cost of $750- $1,500. On a separate note, I listened to a conference call on e-waste services that was conducted by the IEPA last week. Representatives from local governments, the IEPA, recyclers, manufacturers and others participated. The IEPA is finalizing a report on the current e-waste regulations, and the primary recommendation will be to set up county-wide, permanent collection sites across the state. This recommendation does not yet address how to fund or operate those sites – just that such a setup is the most efficient and economical way to provide the service. I would not be surprised to see such a program implemented across the state in the next few years. Recommendation Staff recommends proceeding forward with a semi-annual e-waste pickup Memorandum To: City Council From: Bart Olson, City Administrator CC: Date: December 10, 2015 Subject: E-Waste Recycling Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number OB #2 Tracking Number PW 2015-55 Route 47 – Pedestrian Crossings Public Works Committee – December 15, 2015 None Discussion Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department There are 11 pedestrian crossings across IL Route 47 within Yorkville city limits. Of the 11 crossings, only three (3) locations are located outside of a traffic signal: one (1) at Orange Street, one (1) at Hydraulic Street and one (1) at Main Street. At Orange Street, a set of school crossing signs have been installed that light up when a pedestrian push button is activated. A crossing guard is also present before and after school to aid the students in crossing IL Route 47. The crossings at Hydraulic Street and Main Street do not currently have lighted signs. A map showing the crossings along IL Route 47 is attached. As requested, we investigated the pedestrian crossing on IL Route 47 at Main Street due to safety concerns raised by the City. Our findings are below. Existing Conditions and Observations: On Friday, December 4th, 2015, EEI personnel completed field investigations of the existing conditions and traffic patterns along IL Route 47 at Main Street. IL Route 47 at the intersection with Main Street is a five (5)-lane roadway, two (2) lanes each direction with a left-turn lane on the northbound approach and a bidirectional left-turn lane on the southbound approach. The width of the roadway is 63 feet. The average daily traffic along IL Route 47 at this location is 19,500 vehicles per day (taken from the traffic count map on IDOT’s website). Signage/Markings On northbound IL Route 47, a pedestrian crossing ahead sign is provided approximately 250’ in advance of the crosswalk at Main Street, with a pedestrian crossing sign also located at the crosswalk. On southbound IL Route 47, a pedestrian crossing ahead sign is provided approximately 260’ in advance of the crosswalk, with a pedestrian crossing sign also located at the crosswalk. The crosswalk is delineated by two (2) 6” wide white transverse markings with red colored concrete in between. Main Street is controlled by stop signs at both approaches and IL Route 47 is uncontrolled. A view of the crossing facing northbound is on the following page. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI Collette Frohlich, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Director Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: December 8, 2015 Subject: Rt 47 and Main Street – Pedestrian Crossing Photo 1. Crosswalk on IL Route 47 at Main Street, Facing Northbound Traffic and Pedestrian Patterns Vehicular and pedestrian traffic was counted from 6:45am to 8:45 am and from 2:00 pm to 4:00 pm for the intersection of IL Route 47 and Main Street. During each of the time periods counted, a peak 30- minute period was identified. The table below shows the AM and PM ½ hour peak observed. Time Period December 2015 Opposing Traffic Pedestrians 7:56-8:25 AM 911 1 3:25-3:54 PM 985 3 All pedestrians that crossed IL Route 47 at Main Street crossed the first two (2) lanes of traffic, waited in the bi-directional left turn lane, and crossed the other two (2) lanes of traffic when there was a large enough gap for them to continue. It was generally observed that the majority of the pedestrian traffic crossed IL Route 47 at Somonauk Street. In addition to vehicular and pedestrian traffic counts, gaps in traffic greater than 21 seconds were also recorded as a gap long enough for a pedestrian to cross at this location. The 21 second interval was estimated using a crossing speed of 3.5 feet per second (taken from the MUTCD) and a pedestrian startup time of 3 seconds. There were five (5) gaps in the traffic on IL Route 47 that met that length in the AM period and five (5) gaps recorded in the PM period. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers, longer crossing times are needed for school-aged children. They recommend using 2.0 feet per second for elementary school children, 2.5 feet per second for middle school children, and 3.0 feet per second for high school children. Based on those crossing speeds, only one (1) gap in the PM period was long enough for elementary and middle school students, and two (2) additional gaps in the AM period were long enough for high school students. There were no gaps in the AM period that were long enough for elementary or middle school students. Sight Distance One concern raised by the City was possible sight distance constraints of northbound motorists due to the steep grade of the approach. According to the AASHTO Green Book, the stopping sight distances on upgrades of 3% and 6% are 237 feet and 229 feet, respectively. Since the IL Route 47 improvement plans show a grade of 5.5% on the northbound approach, the stopping sight distance required would be slightly over 230 feet. When viewing the crossing from the pedestrian ahead crossing on the northbound approach, the pedestrian crossing sign is visible (see Photo 2 below). Since the pedestrian ahead sign is located approximately 250 feet from the crossing as stated earlier in this memo, it appears that the stopping sight distance requirement is fulfilled, although it may be more difficult for motorists to see smaller pedestrians at that distance. Photo 2. Northbound Approach of Pedestrian Crossing Street Lighting Another concern raised by the City was visibility of the pedestrians to passing motorists during nighttime conditions. There is currently an overhead light at the southeast corner of the intersection which provides some illumination. Similar lighting was also present before the recent IL Route 47 improvements. With the IL Route 47 lighting project, there will be four (4) additional light poles installed near the intersection in early 2016; two (2) on IL Route 47 and two (2) on Main Street. This will increase the visibility of the crosswalk and pedestrians and will meet the current standards. Analysis and Review of Conditions The section on crosswalks in the MUTCD is in the process of being updated. The updated portion will read as follows: “New marked crosswalks alone, without other measures (enhancements) designed to reduce traffic speeds, shorten crossing distances, enhance driver awareness of the crossing, and/or provide active warning of pedestrian presence, should not be installed across uncontrolled roadways where either: A. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel without a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an ADT of 12,000 vehicles per day or greater; or B. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel with a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an ADT of 15,000 vehicles per day or greater, or: C. The speed limit exceeds 35 mph (60 km/h).” Since there are five (5) lanes of travel, no raised median or pedestrian refuge island present, an ADT of 19,500 vehicles per day, minimal pedestrian traffic, and very few gaps in traffic long enough for pedestrians to cross at this location, we would recommend that a pedestrian crossing not be installed at this location. However, since the crossing has already been established, we have evaluated installing other measures to enhance driver awareness of the crossing and provide active warning of pedestrian presence. Signal Warrants First, we reviewed the traffic signal warrants based on pedestrian volume. According to the MUTCD, Signal Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume, the minimum required number of pedestrians crossing the major street at an intersection during an average day is 107 or more for each of any four hours or 133 or more for any one hour period. For Signal Warrant 5, School Crossing, the minimum required number of pedestrians is 20 during the highest crossing hour. Since neither warrant is met based on pedestrian volume observed, the need for a traffic signal is not justified. Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons A pedestrian hybrid beacon is used to control traffic at an unsignalized location to assist pedestrians in crossing at a marked crosswalk. It can be used at locations where a traffic signal is not warranted or the decision was made to not install a traffic control signal. However, the guidelines for installation of a pedestrian hybrid beacon require a minimum pedestrian volume of 20 for one hour of an average day. The pedestrian volume observed does not fit this criterion, so installing a pedestrian hybrid beacon is not justified. Increasing Sign Conspicuity Since traffic signals and pedestrian hybrid beacons are not warranted, another option is increasing the sign conspicuity of the pedestrian crossing signs. Section 2A.15 of the MUTCD offers several suggestions to accomplish this. Some options that could be used include: adding a red or orange flag above signs, adding a warning beacon to the sign, adding LED lights to the sign, or adding a strip of retroreflective material to the sign support. Pavement Markings Pavement markings can also be used to supplement the conspicuity of a crosswalk, such as adding ladder markings within the transverse crosswalk lines. However, because of the grade of the northbound approach, motorists cannot see the crosswalk markings until they are fairly close. For that reason, this may not be an appropriate option. Conclusions and Recommendation If the City chooses to enhance driver awareness, based on our observations we would recommend signage enhancements to the pedestrian crossing. We recommend the Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) as it is more conspicuous to motorists. Photo 3 (below) shows an example of a RRFB assembly at a crosswalk. We recommend replacing the existing pedestrian crossing signs accompanying the “AHEAD” plaque to be replaced with LED blinker signs. We also recommend replacing the existing signage assemblies at the crosswalk (pedestrian crossing signs with diagonal downward arrow plaques) with RRFB assemblies with pedestrian push buttons (new assemblies to include the pedestrian crossing sign and diagonal downward arrow plaque). A signage enhancement exhibit is attached. Photo 3. Sample RRFB Installation in Phoenix, AZ Signage Costs The flashing blinker signs are approximately $1,800 per sign. The RRFB assemblies with pedestrian push button (including the pedestrian crossing sign and diagonal downward arrow plaque) cost approximately $5,000 per assembly. The total cost of the proposed signage enhancements is approximately $13,600. IDOT/FHWA Requirements Since the signage enhancements would be performed within state right-of-way, an IDOT highway permit will be required. The Highway Permit form (OPER 1045) will need to be filled out including a description of the proposed work, location map, detailed drawings, traffic studies, traffic control plan and other pertinent information. IDOT will review the permit request and determine if anything other information is required to be submitted, such as the Individual Highway Permit Bond (OPER 1046). The RRFB is not in the current version of the MUTCD but an Interim Approval (IA-11) Memorandum has been issued. In order to install the RRFB, the Federal Highway Administration requires a letter to request approval of installation. Future Considerations Further study may be prudent in warmer weather as pedestrian counts may be higher in the spring or summer months than what was observed at this time. In addition, more commercial development may warrant review of the safety of the crossing to ensure that no changes in traffic patterns or pedestrians affect the safety and mobility. [_ [_ [_ [_ [_ [_ [_ [_ [_ [_ [_ Bri d g e F o x Veterans R i v er Main Spring Mill S t a g e c o a c h Van Emmon John Cannonball Center P o p l a r Park M c H u g h Erica So m on a u k Edward Countryside Stat e Benja min Teri Orange Beecher Omaha Tuma Schoolhouse Kendall Deer M a p l e Heartland Game Farm Freemont Parkside Walnut Elm King H a y de n Liberty Wacker B a r b e r r y Washington Jackson Sunset Bristol Bruell R a i n t r e e B e av e r Marketview Gre en Bri ar C arly C o u ntry H ills Morgan Kate Homestead Grace Blackberry Shore Wa ls h Adrian Pleasure H a m p t o n Co lonial Madison Identa Purcell Colton Q u i n s e y Leisure White Oak Landmark Clearwater F o x b o r o Hillcrest H a z e l t i n e W e s t o n Crooked Creek Elizabeth Conover Ba dg e r G arde n G r e e n field Birchwood Ast er N o r w a y Taus C ri m s o n Arrowhead Gawne Deerpath Marketplace R e d h o r s e Illini Prairie Crossing Wild Indigo Ridge C l o v e r Olsen Wooden Bridge M u i r f i e l d Strawberry K e l l y Northland Wor sley Hydraulic R i v er B irc h Fir Woodland Colu mbine Cornell Sanders Birch M e ad o w la r k Cornerstone S p r u c e D ydyna P a l m e r C o r a l b e r r y Bell C o d y Mulhern J o h n s o n H a r t f i e l d B l a c k b e r r y Tomasik Faw n R i d ge Carpenter T o m m y H u g h e s H arv e st Po w ers Candleberry Patrick Jefferson Hawthorne A n d e r s o n Spicebush Hydraulic Schoolhouse M a p l e Main P a r k M cHugh Center S t a g e c o a c h Heustis Isabel Church Prairie Blaine Wolf B a n b u r y Ja m es to w n Adams K i n g s m i l l K i n g s m ill Georgeanna D e e r p o i n t Ridge W i n d s o r Independence West Walter Martin Dalton Village View W o o d Sa ge S u n n y D e ll Dakota Hic kory H i c k o r y Woodworth Prairie Pointe D ic k s o n Dolph Dolph P i n e Aub u rn Tower Oakwoo d Marie Behrens Naden Redwood Prairie R o s e Menard We stw i nd Cedar B u r ni n g B us h I n g e m u n s o n O x f o r d B ator Victoria Blu eja y Mistwood St Joseph's F a r m s t e a d Hearthstone C o n e fl o w e r F l i n t C r e e Appletree Murfield Murfield Haley S a r a v a n o s Gillespie Rodak Stillwater B u c k t h o r n Su nflowe r Heritage B u hr m a s t e r Trillium Meadow RoseFountainview emont t c h g r a s s M a n s f i e l d High Rid W h e a t l a n d Wooddale Prairie Clover a r o n F o x b o r o Main Meadowlark F o x State W a l n u t McHugh Conover W a s h i n g t o n Beecher Tuma Main Morgan K e l ly ROUTE 47 CROSSWALKS DATE: PROJECT NO.: FILE: BY: AUGUST 2015 YO1109 YO1109_CROSSWALK.MXD KKP ILLINOIS ROUTE 47 IMPROVEMENTS UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 06001,200 Feet Legend [_Crosswalks Traffic Signals Engineering Enterprises, Inc. 52 Wheeler Road Sugar Grove, Illinois 60554 (630) 466-6700 www.eeiweb.com PATH:H:\GIS|PUBLIC\YORKVILLE\2011\YO1109 United City of Yorkville 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 NORTH° CROSSWALK WITH FLASHING SIGNS Have a question or comment about this agenda item? Call us Monday-Friday, 8:00am to 4:30pm at 630-553-4350, email us at agendas@yorkville.il.us, post at www.facebook.com/CityofYorkville, tweet us at @CityofYorkville, and/or contact any of your elected officials at http://www.yorkville.il.us/gov_officials.php Agenda Item Summary Memo Title: Meeting and Date: Synopsis: Council Action Previously Taken: Date of Action: Action Taken: Item Number: Type of Vote Required: Council Action Requested: Submitted by: Agenda Item Notes: Reviewed By: Legal Finance Engineer City Administrator Human Resources Community Development Police Public Works Parks and Recreation Agenda Item Number OB #3 Tracking Number PW 2015-57 Traffic Calming Devices – Bristol Bay Elementary School Pedestrian Crossings Public Works Committee – December 15, 2015 None Status Update Brad Sanderson Engineering Name Department As requested, we have prepared a pavement striping and signing plan to further enhance driver awareness of the school crossing at the intersection of Bristol Bay and Bertram at the Bristol Bay Elementary School. The attached drawing provides the general layout of the plan. It should be noted that the majority of the signage recommended is already in place and would not have to be purchased. Estimated costs are being provided for the additional signs that will be needed, which include one (1) flashing school zone speed limit sign per approach on Bristol Bay, and for the enhanced marking (12” thermoplastic pavement markings) we are proposing at the crossings. With the signs, we also recommend purchase of timers for the solar flashing lights so they are only in use during certain times. There is no need to have the lights flashing 24 hours a day. The estimated cost per sign assembly with timer is $2,250. The estimated cost for the pavement markings is $3,500. Therefore, the total estimated cost for the additional signs and pavement marking is $8,000. Please let us know if you have any questions or need further information. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI Colleen C. Jaltuch, EEI CC: Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Director Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: December 8, 2015 Subject: Bristol Bay Elementary School – Pedestrian Crossings TAPCO’s brilliant innovation of enhancing traffic signs with LEDs (Light-Emitting Diodes) makes intersections safer, reduces accidents and saves lives! Day-Viz™ (Daylight Visible BlinkerSigns) feature an array of incredibly bright LEDs that flash in unison, once per second, commanding the attention of drivers DAY AND NIGHT. S1 - 1 S O L A R Patents #6,943,698; #6,693,556 Other Patents Pending Solar Powered No AC Power Required Easy Installation MUTCD Compliant Proprietary Day-Viz™ Circuitry BlinkerSigns™ For complete specifications and details call or visit www.tapconet.com 5100 W. Brown Deer • Brown Deer, WI 53223 Ph: 262.814.7000 • 800.236.0112 Fax: 262.814.7017 • 800.444.0331 www.tapconet.com • www.tapcostore.com Features • Installs easily onto any new or existing sign post • Can be integrated into an ITS (Intelligent Transportation System) • High intensity Day-Viz™ LEDs command attention day and night • Can be programmed to operate continuously (24/7) or on solar time clocks, push-buttons and/or motion (vehicle) detectors • Proprietary circuitry automatically adjusts light output for maximum visibility and battery efficiency • Multiple signs can be synchronized • Heightened driver awareness • Increased visibility at high incident intersections applications • New school locations • High incident intersections • Rural roads • Advance crosswalk warnings standard speci F ications * Sign Specification- MUTCD #S1-1 Sign Substrate .080 Highway Grade Aluminum Reflective Sheeting FYG- 3M™ DG3™- with anti-graffiti overlay MUTCD Compliance MUTCD Section 2A.08 Compliant Day-Viz™ Management System (patent pending) Battery Nickel Metal Hydride (NiHM)- 14,000mAh Battery Lifespan Up to 5 years Autonomy- Functionality without Charge Up to 30 days in 24/7 operation Flash Pattern MUTCD Compliant LED Type High Power Luxeon- 1 watt LED Life Expectancy Over 100,000 hours Warranty Term 1 Full Year Warranty Smart Activation Options 24/7 continuous Time clock activation (Windows based software programmable) Wireless control activation Vehicle detection activation Distributed By: S1 - 1 S O L A R Patents #6,943,698; #6,693,556 Other Patents Pending *All specifications subject to change without notice. 04090004 As requested, we investigated the existing pedestrian and vehicular traffic patterns at the Bristol Bay Elementary School. This review stands to supplement observations conducted on October 18th, 2013 and April 9th, 2014 at the request of the city. Existing Conditions and Observations: On Tuesday October 6th, 2015 and Tuesday October 13th, 2015, EEI personnel completed field investigations of the existing conditions and traffic patterns along Bristol Bay Drive near Bristol Bay Elementary School, supplementing our previous observations on October 18th, 2013 and April 9th, 2014. An aerial view of the school and the intersection is below. Memorandum To: Bart Olson, City Administrator From: Brad Sanderson, EEI Colleen C. Jaltuch, EEI CC: Tim Weidner, EEI Eric Dhuse, Director of Public Works Krysti Barksdale-Noble, Community Dev. Director Lisa Pickering, Deputy City Clerk Date: November 4th, 2015 Signage On eastbound Bristol Bay Drive, a school crossing sign is provided approximately 300’ in advance of the crosswalk at Bertram Drive, and a school speed limit sign is provided in advance of the intersection. On westbound Bristol Bay Drive, a school zone sign is provided approximately 400’ in advance of the crosswalk at Bertram Drive. Bertram Drive is controlled by a stop sign and Bristol Bay Drive is uncontrolled. A view of the crossing for eastbound students on Bristol Bay Drive is below. Traffic and Pedestrian Patterns Vehicular and pedestrian traffic was counted from 8:00am to 9:00 am and from 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm for the intersection of Bristol Bay Drive and Bertram Drive. A vast majority of the traffic (approaching 100%) is generated by the School during the both peaks. Parents enter and exit the school at the east most driveway approximately 600’ east of the Bertram Drive intersection. A minute by minute summary of the traffic and pedestrian volumes observed is attached. During each of the hours counted a peak 30 minute period was identified. The table below shows the AM and PM ½ hour peak observed. Time Period October 2015 April 2014 Opposing Traffic Pedestrians Opposing Traffic Pedestrians 8:09-8:38 AM 244 36 262 20 3:14-3:43 PM 150 108 161 71 Of the pedestrians observed in the AM (in 2015) 28 were elementary school aged, during the PM (in 2015) 85 were of elementary school age. The remaining pedestrians were adults walking to or from the school to pick up children. Drivers stopped for pedestrians in the cross walk on all occasions observed, and no pedestrian ever had to wait for more than 1-minute to safely cross the street either with an adequate gap or a gap created by stopped vehicles. Analysis and Review of Conditions An appropriate gap for a pedestrian based on the Traffic Control Devices Handbook would be between 13.3 seconds (Minimum) and 21 seconds (High) depending on the assumptions used. The observed traffic patterns provide an adequate gaps based on the “minimum” gap, however would not meet based on the “high” gap assumption, based upon methodology in the Traffic Control Devices Handbook. This is however mitigated by the fact that drivers stopped for pedestrians in the cross walk on all occasions observed; and no pedestrian ever had to wait longer than 1-minute (which is the threshold given in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) for consideration of the installation of a traffic signal). Conclusions and Recommendation Based upon our observations no additional signage or other remediation is necessary from a traffic engineering standpoint at this time. As the vehicles are almost all associated with the school, drivers stopped to provide pedestrians an adequate gap to safely cross the street even during times when there is significant traffic. As there is a perception from a few residents that the intersection is unsafe, additional remediation could be considered to satisfy residential concerns and potentially increase child safety. In our opinion, while not necessary these would not create any adverse issues at the intersection and could be implemented at the discretion of the School District and/or the United City of Yorkville: • Periodic reminders from the school to parents observe traffic laws and stop for pedestrians in the crosswalks and obey the school zone speed limits. • Provide a crossing guard at the intersection for the ½-hr before and ½-hr after school arrival and dismissal. • Implement a Parent Patrol Program. • Provide high visibility cross walks rather than standard cross walks. • Installation of in-street pedestrian crossing signs, or parkway signs at crosswalks reminding drivers to stop for pedestrians in the cross walk. • Flashing warning beacons or pedestrian hybrid beacons. The last three bullet points describe traffic calming measures that can be taken to potentially increase child safety. Traffic calming seeks to alter driver behavior to improve conditions for non-motorized street users. Further, a stop sign on Bristol Bay is not warranted at this time and could actually be detrimental to pedestrians, as compliance at an unwarranted stop sign is typically low. This could give a false sense of security to pedestrians crossing the intersection. Future Considerations A view of the east side of the intersection is below. Bristol Bay Drive may be extended easterly in the future. As development continues to the east and Bristol Bay Drive is extended the safety of the crossing should be reviewed to ensure that no changes in traffic patterns or pedestrians affect the safety and mobility. Si t e  Co d e : B r i s t o l  Ba y  an d  Be r t r a m  Dr i v e St a r t  Da t e : St a r t  Ti m e : Da t e 1 3 ‐Oc t ‐15 We a t h e r Cl o u d y  52 º Da t e T i m e T o t a l R i g h t T h r u L e f t R i g h t T h r u L e f t R i g h t T h r u L e f t R i g h t T h r u L e f t 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 0 0  AM1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 0 1  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 0 2  AM4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 0 3  AM1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 0 4  AM1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 0 5  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 0 6  AM1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 0 7  AM2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 0 8  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Op p o s i n g  ve h i c l e s 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 0 9  AM1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 0  AM3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 1  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 2  AM6 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 3  AM2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 4  AM5 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 5  AM7 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 7 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 6  AM5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 6 5 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 7  AM5 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 8  AM8 1 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 7 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 1 9  AM12 1 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 11 Op p o s i n g  Tr a f f i c 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 2 0  AM14 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 14 24 4 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 2 1  AM3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 3 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 2 2  AM19 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 1 2 19 Av e r a g e  He a d w a y 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 2 3  AM16 2 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 14 7. 3 7 7 0 4 9 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 2 4  AM15 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 13 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 2 5  AM15 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 15 Fl o w  Ra t e 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 2 6  AM19 1 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 18 0. 1 3 5 5 5 6 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 2 7  AM13 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 12 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 2 8  AM16 1 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 2 15 Cr o s s i n g  Le n g t h 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 2 9  AM14 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 3 14 36 ft 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 3 0  AM13 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 12 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 3 1  AM18 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 18 Hi g h  Wa l k i n g  Sp e e d  (M U T C D )   10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 3 2  AM9 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 9 3. 5 f t / s e c G A P  Ne c e s s a r y 1 3 . 2 8 5 7 1 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 3 3  AM7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 7 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 3 4  AM6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6 Lo w  Wa l k i n g  Sp e e d  (T r a f f i c  Co n t r o l  De v i c e s ) 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 3 5  AM4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 2 f t / s e c G A P  Ne c e s s a r y 2 1 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 3 6  AM1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Number of Gaps 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 3 7  AM1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Pe r c e n t a g e  of  ad e q u a t e  Ga p s  (M U T C D ) 0 . 1 6 5 1 4 2 4 0 . 2 9 4 5 3 M e e t s  gap requirements 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 3 8  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pe r c e n t a g e  of  ad e q u a t e  Ga p s  (T C D ) 0 . 0 5 8 0 3 7 1 4 . 1 6 1 1 4 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 3 9  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 4 0  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 4 1  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 4 2  AM2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 4 3  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 4 4  AM1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 4 5  AM1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 4 6  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 4 7  AM1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 4 8  AM1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 4 9  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 5 0  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 5 1  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 5 2  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 5 3  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 5 4  AM1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 5 5  AM1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 5 6  AM1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 5 7  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 5 8  AM0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8 : 5 9  AM1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 277 1 6 0 1 2 1 1 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 9 1 1 3 6 8 ad u l t s ,  28  sc h o o l  ch i l d r e n To t a l  Tr a f f i c Pe d e s t r i a n s   Cr o s s i n g   Br i s t o l  Ba y To t a l s 10 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 5 8: 0 0 : 0 0  AM So u t h b o u n d E a s t b o u n d N o r t h b o u n d W e s t b o u n d Si t e  Co d e : B r i s t o l  Ba y  an d  Be r t r a m  Dr i v e St a r t  Da t e : St a r t  Ti m e : Da t e O c t o b e r  6,  20 1 5 We a t h e r S u n n y  72 º Da t e T i m e T o t a l R i g h t T h r u L e f t R i g h t T h r u L e f t R i g h t T h r u L e f t R i g h t T h r u L e f t 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 0  PM 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 1  PM 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 2  PM 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 3  PM 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 4  PM 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 5  PM 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 6  PM 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 7  PM 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 8  PM 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 9  PM 30 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 1 0  PM 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 1 1  PM 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 1 2  PM 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 1 3  PM 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 Op p o s i n g  ve h i c l e s 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 1 4  PM 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 1 5  PM 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 1 6  PM 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 1 7  PM 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 1 8  PM 60 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 1 9  PM 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 3 6 Op p o s i n g  Tr a f f i c 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 2 0  PM 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 15 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 2 1  PM 60 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 3 5 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 2 2  PM 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 Av e r a g e  He a d w a y 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 2 3  PM 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 4 12 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 2 4  PM 50 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 1 4 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 2 5  PM 50 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 fl o w  ra t e   10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 2 6  PM 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0. 0 8 3 3 3 3 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 2 7  PM 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 3 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 2 8  PM 80 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 1 0 6 cr o s s i n g  le n g t h 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 2 9  PM 20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 36 ft 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 3 0  PM 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 3 1  PM 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 hi g h  wa l k i n g  sp e e d  (M U T C D )   10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 3 2  PM 20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3. 5 f t / s e c G A P  Ne c e s s a r y 1 3 . 2 8 5 7 1 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 3 3  PM 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 3 4  PM 40 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 4 Lo w  Wa l k i n g  sp e e d  (T r a f f i c  Co n t r o l  Devices) 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 3 5  PM 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 2 5 2 f t / s e c G A P  Ne c e s s a r y 2 1 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 3 6  PM 12 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 5 12 Number of Gaps 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 3 7  PM 90 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 6 9 Pe r c e n t a g e  of  ad e q u a t e  Ga p s  (MUTCD)0.33050249.57529Meets gap requirements 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 3 8  PM 40 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 Pe r c e n t a g e  of  ad e q u a t e  Ga p s  (TCD)0.17377426.06609 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 3 9  PM 21 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 21 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 4 0  PM 14 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 4 1  PM 18 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 18 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 4 2  PM 40 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 4 3  PM 50 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 4 4  PM 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 4 5  PM 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 4 6  PM 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 4 7  PM 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 4 8  PM 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 4 9  PM 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 5 0  PM 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 5 1  PM 20 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 5 2  PM 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 5 3  PM 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 5 4  PM 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 5 5  PM 20 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 5 6  PM 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 5 7  PM 50 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 5 8  PM 30 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 5 9  PM 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 205 0 0 0 8 9 5 0 1 0 2 1 6 7 4 9 1 0 8 23  ad u l t s 8 5  sc h o o l  El e m e n a r y  Ch i l d r e n We s t b o u n d Pe d e s t r i a n s   Cr o s s i n g  Br i s t o l   Ba y To t a l s 10 / 6 / 2 0 1 5 3: 0 0 : 0 0  PM To t a l  Tr a f f i c S o u t h b o u n d E a s t b o u n d N o r t h b o u n d