Loading...
Plan Commission Minutes 1994 03-16-94 k ' MINUTES OF THE PLAN COMMISSION OF THE UNITED CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS HELD AT THE KENDALL COUNTY BOARD ROOM MARCH 16, 1994 7:00 P.M. The March meeting of the Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Harold Feltz with the following members in attendance: Harold Feltz, George Stewart, Clarence Holdiman, Michael Crouch, Tom Lindbloom, Ralph Pfister, Anne Lucietto;Don Ament(Arrived at 7:10 PM). Others Present: Attorney Kramer, Alderman Baker, City Engineer/Administrator Don Peck and the interested citizens listed on file with the minutes. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any additions or corrections to be made on the February minutes. Hearing none, the motion was made to approve the minutes as typed by Ralph Pfister; seconded George Stewart. Voice vote carried. PC94-3 - Annex&Rezone- Greatb nc Trust o=auy—, Chairman Feltz called the public hearing on PC94-3 to order. Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here representing this property. Attorney Kramer stated this is the property that the City Council and the Mayor directed me to contact the owner to week them to come in. It's located immediately north of the driveway of Remline on the west side of Route 47, goes up to the trak and then back west. Attorney Kramer stated it's about 46 1/2 acres as you can see by the drawing. The owners we're formally associated with Remline. They are asking to come into the City as M-1 Light Manufacturing which we beleive is a consistant use with Remline to the immediate south of the railroad traks. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any questions from the public regarding this property. Hearing none, Chairman Feltz called an end to the public hearing on PC94-3. PC94-4 - Annex&Rezone- Countryside Center. Inc_ Chairman Feltz called the public hearing to order on PC94-4. Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here representing this property. Dallas Ingemunson stated the property is located south of Cannonball Trail with portions extending southerly to Blackberry Creek and from Boomer Road easterly approximately 2,200 feet. There is approximately 43 acres. Dallas stated he would like to answer any questions or comments at this time. Dave Pawlowski stated Yorkville needs to change the current 12,000 square foot minimum to a larger square footage minimum. Dave Pawlowski asked that the letter he submitted be read at this time. Chairman Feltz stated this will be done later in the meeting. It does not pertain to this particular property. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments. Dave Pawloski stated he would like to not see any back doors on Cannonball Trail and no fencing what so ever. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments. Hearing none, Chairman Feltz called an end to the public hearing on PC94-4. PC94-5 - Annex&Rezone- Stanley Ze en Zak Chairman Feltz stated he will hold the public hearing on this parcel even though the owners are not going to be present. Chairman Feltz stated he will listen to the publics comments and then we'll recess it until the owners do show up. Chairman Feltz stated the property is located south of Bristol Woods Subdivision,Unit 1 and approximately 40 acres is located north of Bristol Woods Subdivision, Unit 2. The property is located approximately 1,500 ft. east of Route 47 onb Corneils Road. Chairman Feltz stated he would like to take any comments. Don Peck stated he received a letter from the attorney for Zeplak and asked they be put on next months agenda. A citizen commented on the fact this area is basically swamp land. Anne Lucietto stated this should be a Special Service District. Jeff Palmquist stated maybe this parcel would be best handled as a P.U.D. due to the water and drainage problems. Chairman Feltz asked if there any further questions or comments. Hearing none, Chairman Feltz recessed the public hearing until next month on PC94-5. PC93-23 -Annex&Rezone - Development Resources Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here representing this property. Michael Capp stated this is a preliminary plan. We have sought to provide a mix of different uses on this site retail, office, commercial, single family; multi-family townhouses. We sought to maximize the open space in park land. We have also provided for a network of private paths that will meet every corner of the subdivision so you can get anywhere in this subdivision by the green areas. Michael stated the single family density is less than two units per acre. What we are looking for today is approval of the preliminary plan. Michael stated there is a foot bridge already on the site and we're thinking of narrowing the width to make sure no one tries to drive an automobile on it. Michael stated we are proposing to install a large diameter sanitary sewer and water main along Sequoia Trail. Michael stated there will be street lights a couple of hundred feet apart and at all intersections. Michael stated he would like to answer any questions or comments you may have. George stated the scrubs should be about 2 1/2 to 3 feet tall. Chairman Feltz stated this plan has really come along way in the year that it's been in the making. George Stewart asked if there were sidewalks on both sides of the street everywhere. Michael replied the way the ordinance reads is that each lot should have either a sidewalk in from or a sidewalk to the rear. George Stewart asked if there would be a cross walk at Sequoia Trail. Michael stated yes. George Stewart asked how wide the forest preserve paths would be. Ken Baldwin stated the standard forest preserve width is 8 feet. But we have been asked to cut them down to about 6 feet. George asked if the City would be responsible for these once development is complete. Ken replied no. In our annexation agreement it states there will be a Home Owner Association to take care of them. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments. Hearing none, the motion to approve the tenative preliminary plan subject to engineering discussion by Tom Lindbloom; seconded Don Ament. Anne Lucietto asked if we were asking him to follow threw with the Lannert Group recomendations. Chairman Feltz stated yes. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further comments on this parcel. Hearing none, the ammended motion to approve the tenative preliminary plan subject to engineering discussion, Lannert Group recommendations and a landscape plan by Tom Lindbloom; seconded Don Ament. Roll call vote: Feltz - yes Stewart - yes Holdiman - yes Ament - yes Crouch - yes Lindbloom - yes Pfister - yes Lucietto - yes Motion carried 8-0 PC93-22 - Pavillion Hills. Inc. - Zoning ketch Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here representing this property. Attorney Kramer stated the zoning has already been recommended . The next step will be the preliminary plan. Chairman Feltz stated he would go on to the next item of business. PC94-3 - Annex&Rezone - Greatbanc Trust Company Chairman Feltz called the regular Planning Commision meeting to order on PC94-3. Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone with any questions pertaining this parcel Jeff Palmquist asked if this is an easement along driveway of Remline. Is that where you would invision the road going through. Don Peck replied at the south property line there will be a new entrance off of Route 47 and that will be the main access to that property. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions pertaining to this property. Hearing none, the motion was made to approve the annexation and zoning from Kendall County A to City M-1 Light Manufacturing by Tom Lindbloom; seconded Michael Crouch. Roll call vote: Feltz - yes Stewart - no Holdiman - no Ament - yes Crouch - yes Lindbloom - yes Pfister - yes Lucietto - yes Motion carried 6-2 PC94-4 - Annex&Rezone - Countryside Center, Inc. Chairman Feltz asked if the detention areas and open spaces are those part of the lots or are they common areas. Dallas Ingemunson stated they are part of the lots. Chairman Feltz asked if there was any green areas or open spaces for play grounds. Dallas replied no. Chairman Feltz stated he thinks we should use the Zoning Analysis Checkslist on this parcel Anne Lucietto read the Zoning Analysis Checklist (copy attached)in it's entirety with the following list of concerns: 1. Need to have green area or open space for a park or playground. 2. Provide some type of detention by the creek. 3. Amurol RoadBurm 4. Need to provide a soil study. 5. Utility easement on the east side of approximately 20 feet wide. Chairman Feltz stated we'll make two seperate votes, 1 one the annexation and 2 one the zoning of the parcel. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments on this parcel. Hearing none, the motion was made to approve the annexation of this property by Anne Lucietto; seconded Michael Crouch. Roll call vote: Feltz - yes Stewart - yes Holdiman - yes Ament - yes Crouch - yes Lindbloom - yes Pfister - yes Lucietto - yes Motion carried 8-0 Chairman Feltz asked if there were any questions or comments on the zoning of this parcel. Hearing none, the motion was made to approve the zoning of this property by George Stewart; seconded Ralph Pfister. Roll call vote: Fletz - yes Stewart - yes Holdiman - yes Ament - yes Crouch - yes Lindbloom - yes Pfister - yes Lucietto - yes Motion carried 8-0 PC94-6 - Rezoning - Inland Land Appreciation Fund Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here representing this parcel. Chuck Hanlon stated the property is located north of Hilltop Road., east of Route 71 and west of Minkler Road. Chuck stated the drainage on the property the orange lines are the where the drainage divides on the property. The arrows indicate the off site flows, we have 123 acres of off site flow. 320 feet off the property towards the north of Route 71 there is a substantial 6'X 6'box culvert that exits into that detention pond. Chuck Hanlon stated he is looking for input from this committee as to the zoning of the parcel and the density. Chuck stated he would like at this time to answer any questions or comments. Ralph Pfister asked if this was going to be well and septic. Chuck replied yes. Ralph Pfister asked if we would require sidewalks. Chuck stated he was not sure if they were proposing sidewalks. George asked why this came in as a P.U.D. Chuck stated mostly because of the open spaces and because we are requesting an R-3 zoning. Ralph Pfister is there future easements configured in this plan. Chuck replied yes. George Stewart stated we are basically recommending the Subdivison Control Ordinanace. Chairman Feltz stated yes. Chairman Feltz stated the following list of concerns for this development: 1. Sidewalks 2. Street Lights 3. Parks/Playground 4. Easements 5. Connecting streets George asked if the ponds were detention or retention. Chuck stated they will be dentention ponds. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments. Hearing none, Chairman Feltz thanked Chuck Hanlon for his presentation. Chairman Feltz asked if there was anthing further to add to the comprehensive plan. Hearing none, Chairman Fletz stated he was going to turn it over to the City Council. Chairman Feltz stated he would like to read the letter that was passed out by Dave Pawloski, Chairman of the Bristol Planning Commission at the beginning of the meeting. It reads as follows: It has been brought to our attention, that there are proposed Yorkville annexations for building and/or proposed subdivisons that are currently in Bristol Township. As a newly founded planning commission, this has us concerned. We would like Yorkville and Bristol Township to work in a harmonious partnership for the future of both areas. We as Bristol Township Planning Commision would like to ask for a meeting with the Yorkville Planning Commission possible within the next 30 days. A possible date would be Monday, April 18th. We would like to discuss some of the concerns of the planning commission and area home owners. This meeting would be open to the public, but would be a closed forum. Again, it would be advatageous for all of us to get together. With no further comments evident on the topics listed on tonight's agenda, Chairman Feltz adjourned the meeting at 10:30 P.M. im King, R cor ' ecretary . t r ZONING ANALYSIS CHECKLIST PETITION: TC `A_4 DATE: 3 Ib Cpowrg st r>iE n1C,. LAND USE CONCERNS YES NO OTHER 1. Is the change consistent with the comprehensive plan? 2. Is the change congruous with surrounding zoning districts? 3. Is the change congruous with existing adjacent uses? 4. Is the change congruous with existing commitments or planned public improvements? x 5. Will the change result in private investment which would be beneficial to the redevelopment of a deteriorated area? 6. Will the change generally maintain or enhance property values in the X vicinity? COMMENTS: i ENVIRONMENTAL AND DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS YES NO OTHER 1. Is the location of future roads consistent with the official plans of the X City? ftmo"(, Pow / f ww 2. Does the change conform to standards of traffic safety and orderly traffic patterns? A 3. If necessary, are other means of transportation available for access to and from the proposed use? _T 4. Does the proposed use promote the use of pedestrian rights-of-way for convenience and safety? x 5. Does the change conform to all pertinent environmental regulations? X 6. Can the proposed use conform to storm water run-off requirements? }� 7. Are recreational opportunities available or being provided for the proposed use? x 8. Can the proposed use be adequately served by municipal services? 9. Is there capacity in the local schools for new students produced by \ / the proposed use? �C COMMENTS: SUITABILITY OF THE SITE YES NO OTHER 1. Can the proposed use fulfill all current zoning requirements? �( a. frontage b. setbacks C. lot area d. maximum'lot coverage e. floor area ratio f. enclosure of use g. parking spaces h. screening i. water and sewage disposal j. right-of-way for street width (city, county, or state) 2. Is the topography of the site suitable for the proposed use? AW, X 3. Are the soils suitable for the proposed use? it X 4. Are the soils suitable for septic systems if proposed as part of the use? COMMENTS: _• PLAN COMMISSION MEETING /g� Aooee ZOOiA;6 • P/A PC�3-2,3 PC 5�!_ PC9y,l PC PC PC HAROLD FELTZ GEORGE STEWART CLARENCE HOLDIMAN ,JO 0 DON AMENT v'� LAWRENCE LANGLAND A _ SANDRA ADAMS MICHAEL CROUCH p TOM LINDBLOOM RALPH PFISTER P i ANNE LUCIETTO Il0 (� BUCK KOLKMEYER GREG KRABER ------------------------------------------------------------------- OTHEIIS PRESENT: PUBLIC HEARING /SIGN-IN SHEET NAME ADDRESS 9¢99 ?71CA C,l 94 to /-0 A XA44-A d"Idl,h .46!6 9 5 L"j-%Jo Z- 4P415415 /L 1 SQbL 7y5s w• gdvqti oc _ rXP.V,4r P.O%t.r- Pg, AO _16 .I-A) LC�Q�.�-C MARyLo" KRazie% un*4e LA( BRisToL . Ayo Z Zjqi5 gt �f w r r PUBLIC HEARING /SIGN-IN SHEET NAME ADDRESS 123