Plan Commission Minutes 1994 06-15-94 MINUTES OF THE PLAN COMMISSION OF THE UNITED CITY OF
THE VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS
HELD AT THE KENDALL COUNTY BOARD ROOM
JUNE 15, 1994 7:00 P.M.
The June meeting of the Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Harold Feltz with the
following members in attendance:
Harold Feltz, Clarence Holdiman, Don Ament, Lawrence Langland,
Michael Crouch, Tom Lindbloom, Anne Lucietto;Dave Dockstader
Others Present: Alderman Baker, Alderman Prochaska,
Acting Administrator/Police Chief Graff, Consulting
Engineer Bill Schmanski, Planning Consultant
Jeff Palmquist; Attorney Hiles
Chairman Feltz asked if there were any additions or corrections to be made to the May minutes.
Chairman Feltz stated on the front page the comment Doc Davis made about going over the
covenants of the property I would like to put after that the covenants of the property after it was
approved by the City and Planning Commission this concern was during and after construction.
Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further additions or corrections to be made.
Hearing none, the motion was made to approve the amended minutes by Larry Langland;
seconded Clarence Holdiman. Voice vote carried.
PC94-12 - Annex&Zone Kendall Co. Ag to City R-2 - George& Sandra Stewart
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here for the public hearing on this property.
Hearing no one, Chairman Feltz stated we would take this up later this evening if anyone does
show up.
PC93-21 - Dwyer- Country Hills- Preliminary Plan& Traffic Study
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here representing this property.
Jack Kusak with McClure Engineering stated he took the list of items that need to be resolved
from last months Planning Commission meeting and has addressed all of them.
Jack stated they have the dedicated right-of-ways, an easement for a walk way, detention sizing,
dedicated right of ways for the street extension, IDOT review, extension of water main thru lot 7
& 8, street lights at Route 71, duplexes with garage, sewer capacity down stream, burming along
Route 71 and a park in the north west corner and a total land contribution of approximately 2.5
acres and the remainder given in cash per the ordinance and the 5 year detention area not be
included in the 2.5 acres.
Chairman Feltz asked if there were any questions or comments on this property.
Chairman Feltz asked how the sewer capacity worked out.
Bill Schmanski stated the 10" line that's proposed thru the site will serve the properties to the
south and east.
Chairman Feltz asked Bill Schmanski if he felt confident with this.
Bill replied yes.
Jeff Palmquist stated on the preliminary plan the park acres with out the detention is not 2.5 acres
it is 1.7 acres.
Jack Kusack stated there might be some distortion on the computer printout of the drawing.
Jack stated we will do what ever it takes to get the park to 2.5 acres.
Tony Graff asked if the park would be done in phase 1 or phase 2.
Jack stated yes, but will the road be finished.
Jack stated he would like to request that they be allowed to have a temporary turn around on that
street.
Jeff asked is there a tree conservation.
Jack replied yes.
Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments on this parcel.
Jack stated he would like to let the record show the additional lot to be done in phase one to
incorporate the park. They are lots 74, 75, 76, 79, 80, 81, 82& 83.
Chairman Feltz asked Bill Schmanski&Jeff Palmquist if there would be any reason why we could
not approve the preliminary from your stand point knowing they have some things to bring in for
the final.
Bill replied he sees no reason not to.
Jeff agreed with Bill.
Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments on this parcel.
Hearing none, the motion was made to recommend to the City Council the approval of the
preliminary plan subject to the following:
1) Pedestrian easement/walk ways
2) Park 2.5 acres
3) Tree conservation
4) Phase 1 to include the additional lots
5) The temporary turn around
6) The tile easement
7) IDOT review
8) Route 71 lights
9) Detailed landscape plan at final
by Lawrence Langland; seconded Clarence Holdiman.
Roll call vote:
Feltz - yes Holdiman - yes Ament - yes Langland - yes
Crouch-yes Lindbloom-yes Lucietto -yes Dockstader-yes
Motion carried 8-0
PC94-12 - Annex&Zone from Kendall Co. Ag to City R-2- George& Sandra Stewart
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chairman Feltz asked if there is anyone here for the public hearing of PC94-12.
Tom Lindbloom stated at some point we need to say this will be postponed to a later date. There
are a few people here for this public hearing.
Chairman Feltz agreed.
Tom Lindbloom made the motion to postpone the public hearing and renotify everyone when this
date will be; seconded Don Ament. Voice vote carried.
PC94-9 - OSNB Trust#5358-Wehrli- Green Briar P.U.D./Preliminary Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here to represent this property.
John Bajor with Morris Engineering stated the Green Briar P.U.D is 76. acre tract of land located
approximately 1000 feet west of Route 47 bordered to the north by section 32. The property is
currently zoned A-1 and is proposed to be zoned for single family homes R-2 and duplexes R-2D.
The duplexes are proposed along the east boundary of the P.U.D. to buffer the proposed single
family use of the remainder of the P.U.D. from the existing commercial use to the east of the PUD
parcel.
John stated the ingress and egress to the subdivision is proposed to be constructed due west of
Route 47 through construction of a 2400 ft. road with a 100 ft. right of way which would bisect
with the south property line of Green Briar P.U.D. All interior roads are 60ft R.O.W. to provide
adequate space for all utilities as shown on the various plan sheets. The roads and cul-de-sacs
have been designed to conform to village standards.
John stated the parcel drains very well to the north. The proposed design makes good use of an
existing basin at the northwest portion of the P.U.D. to provide adequate detention of
stormwater. No wetlands or floodplain exists within the parcel. Detention for the parcel has been
provided throughout the design of detention areas A and B. Detention area A provides 2.45
acres-feet of storage volume for the 100 year event, detention area B provides 7.16 acre-feet.
Collectively the detention areas provide a total of 9.61 acre-feet of detention.
John stated an 8" DIP watermain runs parallel to and approximately 20 ft. northeast of Green
Briar's northeast property line. It is proposed that this tap on opportunity be considered. This
low pressure zone is approximately 46 psi. A 12" DIP watermain runs parallel to and on the east
side of Route 47. As we wish to "Loop" the internal water distribution system and this 12" main
is high pressure, a pressure regulating valve is required. It is proposed that this extension be
looped via the access road to the south. All hydrants have been placed in accordance with the
400 foot maximum spacing requirement and at intersections and dead ends. A loop has been
incorporated between the terminal bulbs of the cul-de-sacs named Hawthorn Court and
Buchthorn Court. A 20 foot maintenance easement has been provided. The main subdivision
water pipe is a 10 inch main running fully along Green Briar Way. This main is to be connected
to the north at the existing water main within a permanent easement along the northeast parcel
property line. Water main valves and vaults have been planned to provide good operating
opportunities and minimum service disruption to the residents during repairs on the system.
John stated a 12" sanitary sewer exists to the northeast and within the property limits of the
subdivision. The subdivision sanitary sewer is designed to flow to the connection point. A 12"
sanitary sewer within an easement will connect with the major 10" sanitary sewer which runs
along Green Briar Way and sewers the development. All manholes are placed a maximum of 400
feet apart and at intersections. The manholes will be furnished with chimney seals to prevent
inflow and infiltration.
Chairman Feltz asked if there were any questions or comments regarding this parcel.
Larry Langland asked if they we're still going to keep the trees.
John replied yes.
Anne Lucietto asked if they checked there street names with the street names the City already has.
John replied not, but they will.
Chairman Feltz stated he is reluctant to approve the preliminary because of the road to match up
from across the street.
Tony stated that everyone is basically in agreement to an easement and a right of way they only
thing open for negotiation is the actual recapture amounts and were negotiating with them now.
Chairman Feltz stated he wants to make sure City Council is aware that if these roads do not line
up with one another, the Planning Commission will not approve it.
Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments.
Hearing none the motion was made to recommend the approval of the preliminary plan to the City
Council subject to the following:
1) Matching roads
2) Tree line left in
3) Lot 73 easement
4) Increase lot size by adjustment
by Anne Lucietto; seconded Michael Crouch. Roll call vote:
Feltz - yes Holdiman - yes Ament - yes Langland- no
Crouch - yes Lindbloom-no Lucietto -yes Dockstader-yes
Motion carried 6-2
PC94-4 - Countryside Center-Blackberry Creek North Final Plat
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here representing this parcel.
Dallas Ingemunson asked Bill Schmanski if he had talked to the Engineers for Deuchler about the
landscaping and burm.
Bill Schmanski replied we really didn't talk about anything except very few details.
Chairman Feltz asked if the Recreation Board was happy with money they will receive.
Dave Dockstader replied yes.
Tony Graff stated the money came to about$50,000.00.
Chairman Feltz asked Jeff Palmquist if he had any concerns with the plan.
Jeff replied no.
Chairman Feltz asked Bill Schmanski if he had any concerns with the engineering.
Bill replied he has seen no engineering.
Chairman Feltz stated we'll wait until next month to take any action pending on the engineering
review.
Park Guidelines/Lannert Group
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JeffPalmquist stated in an effort to assist the City of Yorkville in better understanding and
planning for parks and open space, I have provided the Park Guidelines. (See attached)
Chairman Feltz asked if there were any questions or comments on these guidelines.
Hearing none, Chairman Feltz thanked Jeff for coming up with these guidelines.
Fox Hill P.U.D. - Landscape Review
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chairman Feltz stated we approved the final plat of the Fox Hill P.U.D. for phase one. Jeff didn't
have the landscape plan at that time.
Jeff Palmquist stated there are five things that needs to be complied with they are as follows:
1) Compliance with preliminary plan
2) Design
3) Types of species for landscaping
4) Need landscaping in there green spaces
5) Recommend the developer address these recommendations outlined above prior to approval of
final plat
With no further comments evident on the topics listed on tonight's agenda, Chairman Felts
adjourned the meeting at 10:00 P.M.
Ki King, Reco in cretary
't
Lannert Group
•LAND
PLANNING
•LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
June 2, 1994 .CIVIL
ENGINEERING
•COMMUNITY
CONSULTING
•DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Tony Graff MANAGEMENT
City of Yorkville
610 Tower Lane
Yorkville, IL 60560
RE: Park Guidelines - Job #9497A
Dear Tony:
In an effort to assist the City of Yorkville in better understanding and planning
for parks and open space, I have provided the following attachments:
1. Fox Valley Park District Standards (pg. 3-1)
Note the criteria on this page. The FVPD land dedication standard, like
Yorkville's is ten acres per 1,000 persons. The FVPD "allocates" these ten
acres by the ratio of 5.5 acres for sub-neighborhood and neighborhood parks
and 4.5 acres for community parks.
Also, notice that the minimum size of a sub-neighborhood or neighborhood
park is four acres. The FVPD does not accept any park dedication under four
acres. In addition, the FVPD prefers these parks to be rectangular in shape.
Based upon our experiences with the FVPD, they take an active role in the
development process ensuring that any dedication conforms as closely as
possible to their criteria.
The last criteria of note on this page is the service area standard for these
sub-neighborhood and neighborhood parks (1/2-mile walking distance).
Also, during a recent phone conversation with the FVPD's planner, he
revealed another noteworthy guideline. In the layout of any park, they try to
provide a minimum of 100 feet between a park element (i.e. playground,
court, ballfield) and a residential lot. This is a very reasonable guideline and,
if applied to small parks such as that which may be part of the Dwyer
subdivision, suggests that at least 1.25 acres of area would be required to
accommodate Just a tot lot. THE LANNERT GROUP
311 NORTH 2ND STREET SUITE 300 ST. CHARLES, IL 60174 708 377.6900 FAX 708 377.7131
Page 2
Tony Graff
June 2, 1994
2. Open Space Classifications (pg. 3-4)
This page illustrates one method of classifying open space in terms of local
open space and regional open space. This classification is part of the
foundation of any park and open space master plan.
3. FVPD Criteria for the Acceptance of Dedicated Lands
This page describes the development criteria which must be met prior to
acceptance of a site by the FVPD.
4. FVPD Criteria for Construction of Stormwater Lake Retention
Areas (pg. 3-9, 3-10)
This list of criteria should be self-explanatory.
5. FVPD Criteria for Construction of Blue-Green Stormwater
Detention Areas (p. 3-13)
This list of criteria should also be self-explanatory.
6. Appendix A - Suggested Facility Development Standards (from
National Recreation and Park Association)
This two-page list provides general planning standards for a wide range of
activities. One facility missing is a typical arrangement of consolidated play
equipment.
A small "typical" equipment area within a tot lot is roughly 30 feet by 40 feet.
Note the suggested service radii for facilities such as basketball (1/4-1/2 mile),
softball (1/4 - 1/2 mile), and tennis (1/4 -1/2 mile).
What do all these criteria and guidelines suggest? As consulting planners, we
have difficulty evaluating the proposed or potential park/open space
components of proposed subdivisions. Without standards or guidelines, we
find ourselves engaging in ad hoc park planning. Collectively, we do not know
what the community's needs, ideas, values, and goals for park and open
space development are. Therefore, our foremost recommendation is for the
City and/or the recreation department to formulate a park, open space, and
recreation master plan.
Such a master plan includes elements such as goals and objectives, inventory
of existing resources, open space criteria, and a master development plan.
We shall gladly assist in the formulation of such a plan at the earliest possible
opportunity.
Page 3
Tony Graff
June 2, 19'94
Indeed, as the planner for the Fox Valley Park District tells me, there is
significant LAWCON grant money available for park and open space
development. However, a criterion for eligibility is a park master plan.
Of course, we understand the problem of limited resources and funding. If the
master plan is presently unrealistic, we nevertheless encourage the recreation
board to formulate criteria for acceptance of dedicated lands, criteria for
stormwater retention/detention, and general guidelines for the community-wide
distribution of recreation facilities. We, again, shall gladly assist in the task.
The recreation board is also faced with the more immediate task of reviewing
potential park dedications for the Dwyer, Purcell, and Werhli subdivisions. We
recommend that the recreation board first determine the appropriate
recreation facilities for each of these areas. Once the facility sizes and
appropriate buffer and passive "green" areas are determined, the overall park
size and general configuration can be ascertained.
I have offered the services of The Lannert Group to assist in any overall
park/recreation planning. I am happy to also address the recreation board
and/or council regarding these issues.
Since
r
Jreyyy D. Pal quist, AICP
Vice President
Community Consulting
JP:clb
Enclosures 7
cc: Mayor Kittoe
Jeff Baker
Harold Feltz
Dan Kramer
b:prkguidl.ltr
PARK STANDARDS
In order for park officials to be responsive to present and future Recreation Open Space needs,they
must have some kind of guidelines. Standards,based on a population ratio,appear to be the best
solution.
Standards are flexible guides for the planning and acquisition of park, recreation and open space
areas. in general the standards seek to furnish ten(10)acres of permanent publicly owned park and
open space for each one thousand residents. The 10 acres should be further allocated as 5.5 acres
for Neighborhood Open Space and 4.5.acres for Community Open Space.
The following table illustrates the standards as they relate to population served,size range,service
area, and open space designation.
'J'2v. ••7�h Y ;{SF i3::v nr', Yi:' 7{�,••:
v:... .ryf.:�}•: �•.. ...G}.�.... 1,:'• +{fir ' : ,f yy
'k•.Cv}i�j,•.i.•`': }�1' jf+ -• • a••,�k ky��}Jj�:i }�.••C-..ji.'$St�:;.}, ..
}':... :•
SUB-NEIGHBORHOOD
LOCAL CLASSIFICATION NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY
Designation Mini Park Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Park/School Community Park/School
Size Range 4 acres minimum to 15-200 acres
15 acres
Acres per 1,000 pop. 5.5* 4.5*
Population Served 800-2700 3000+
Service Area Neighborhood: within 15 minutes driving time
1/2 mile walking distance
The use of these standards by this District is most appropriate due to the local municipalities'
mandatory land dedication ordinances. These ordinances have as a basis the population ratio
standards. However,the precise application of standards is often impractical. The importance of
local factors must also be included in consideringfuture park and open space needs and appropriate
adjustments must be made accordingly if these standards are to be useful. Consideration should be
given to the following in the total planning process:
• Expressed needs and desires of the citizens • New trends or patterns in recreation
• Time—distance from park • Private facilities
• Socio-economic factors • Quantity and quality of existing
• Special local conditions facilities
In the next chapter a more complete analysis of need is established for both neighborhood and
community facilities and along with the use of these standards appropriate recommendations can
be made for the Comprehensive Open Space Master Plan.
3-1
OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATIONS
Recreation and Conservation/Protection Open Space can be subdivided into more detailed
categories based upon the use for which the land is intended.
The classification code has been developed to identify,categorize and assign the open space
uses,functions of the land,and governmental responsibility. The classifications are intended to
serve as a guide for all government agencies involved in open space.
Local Open Space Classifications
RECREATION FUNCTION
1. Sub-Neighborhood Designation: Mini Park
2. Neighborhood Designation: Neighborhood Park,Neighborhood Park/School
3. Community Designation: Community Park,Community Park/School
4. Linear Designation: Linear Park,Recreation Trail
5. Community-Wide Special: Golf Course,Sports Complex,Winter Sports Complex,
Nature Center,Community Center,Aquatic Center,etc.
b. Private Designation: Golf Course,Fishing Park,Aquatic Center,etc.
CONSERVATION/PROTECTION FUNCTION
1. Conservation/Protection Marsh,Lake,River Shoreline,Floodplain,Fond,
Designation: Woodlot,etc.
Regional Open Space Classifications
RECREATION FUNCTION
1. Forest Preserve Designation: Preserves,Lakes,Picnic Areas,Nature Centers,Winter
Sports Area
2. Linear Designation: Linear Park,Recreation Trail
3. Private Designation: Parks,Campgrounds,RV Parks,Resorts,Skiing Slopes,
Marinas,Tennis Centers
CONSERVATION/PROTECTION FUNCTION
1. Forest Preserve Designation: Preserves,Wildlife Preserves,Arboretums, Nature
Centers
2. Linear Park&Recreation Trails
Designation: Linear Parks,Recreation Trails
3. Conservation&Protection
Designation: Natural Areas,Preserves,Scenic Rivers/Creeks
3---4
FVPD CRITERIA FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF
DEDICATED LANDS
The following criteria shall be applied to property dedicated to the District via the Municipal land/
Cash Ordinance of Aurora, North Aurora and Montgomery.
1. All land must be free from detention or retention requirements and be above the 100 year
flood level.
2. land should be contiguous and in a configuration to allow for the development of the
proposed recreational components.
3. Neighborhood and Community Parks shall have a minimum of 25%of the total perimeter
directly fronting on a public roadway.Additional access should be provided as needed.
4. Minimum secondary access should be 60 feet.
5. All park property shall be fully improved including:
Roads
Sidewalks*
Availability of all utilities
Street trees*
6"of topsoil--rough graded,fine graded,and seeded**
6. The grade and topography of the site shal I be engineered by the developer for the District's
approval:
a. No slope shall be in excess of 4:1.
b. The site shall be graded so that water does not pond and will have
positive drainage.
7. Park sites shall not be used as borrow pits for clay or any other building material and shall
be stable enough to support the proposed park improvements.
*
If included in the balance of the subdivision.
** The developer may elect to have the District fine grade and seed the park, with Park Distrkt
concurrence,andcompensate the District for the workat a rateagreed upon atthe time ofdedication
agreement.
3-8
FVPD CRITERIA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STORM WATER
LAKE RETENTION AREAS
The developer shall submit a lake design plan to the Fox Valley Park District that shall show the
following:
1. 1'topography contours
2. Normal water level
3. 100 year flood level
4. Inlet and outlet locations
5. Design details for inlet and outlet structures
6. Certification by registered engineer
7. Date,scale and north arrow
8. Property boundaries and acreages
9. Cross-section elevation through the mid point of the lake
The Fox Valley Park District Board will base its approval upon the following criteria:
1. Side slope above water level shall be between 6:1 and 10:1.
2. Slope below water level shall be 2:1.
3. A 4'wide, level safety ledge shall be provided at a 3'depth.
4. Minimum lake area shall be 3 acres.
5. 25%of the lake shall be at least 12'deep.The balance of the lake bottom shall be at least
8'deep.
6. Provision for erosion protection at inlets and outlets. Design must meet or exceed city's
criteria and guarantee requirements.
7. A 30'buildable area shall be provided around the lake above the 100 year flood level.
8. 250 of the land in the lake park shall be above the 100 year flood level.This land would
be exclusive of the 30'buildable area.
9. Provision for multi-purpose recreational use.Must be contiguous with park land.
10. The plans for the lake must meet the technical approval of the municipalities'engineering
department.
11. Three copies of the final plans shall be submitted to the Fox Valley Park District twenty-one
(21)days prior to any action by the Board of Trustees.
12. Any inlets or outlets in excess of eighteen(18)inches shall have a safety grating.
13. Any lakes with a water shed of 10 acres or more shall have a mechanical drop box type
spillway.The spillway shall be equipped with a safety grate.
14. Al I lakes with a dam shal I have an emergency spi llwayto proteathe dam.The spillway shal I
be sod and shall be designed to accommodate the 50 year storm.
15. The developers shall notify the District forty-eight(48) hours prior to the start of and during
key phases of construction.
3-9
FVPD CRITERIA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BLUE-GREEN
STORM WATER DETENTION AREAS
Blue-Green detention areas are turf detention basins which,after storm events,drain within
a maximum of 24 hours.The basins are then available for recreational use.No credit toward
municipal land cash obligation shall be given for blue-green detention.Detention areas shall
be designed with functional required park land.No stand alone facilities will be considered.
The developer shall submit an engineering plan to the Fox Valley Park District that shalI show
the following:
1. 1' topography contours
2. Normal water level
3. 100, 50 and 10 year flood levels
4. Inlet and outlet locations
5. Design details for inlet and outlet structures
6. Certification by registered engineer
7. Date, scale and north arrow
8. All property boundaries and acreage
The following criteria on the design of the Blue-Green area shall be in effect:
1. A minimum of 25%of the Blue-Green park shall be above the 100 year storm
level.
2. Total release of 100 year storm shall be a maximum time of 24 hours.
3. Side slopes should be a minimum of 4:1 for 75%of basin,and 6:1 for 25%.
4. Plans or specifications shall comply with any applicable city or village
ordinances.
5. Sites shall have 25%of perimeter open to public streets.
6. Secondary access points shall be a minimum of 60' wide.
7. Bottom slope of the Blue-Green areas will have a minimum of a 2%slope for
positive drainage to the outfall.
8. Storm water drainage piping and appurtenances within the park shall be
dedicated to the applicable city or village at the time of final plat of
subdivision or at the time of dedication of land to the Park District. It is
understood that the village or city will accept dedication of the storm water
drainage piping and appurtenances and will assume responsibility to main-
tain, repair, renew, restore, and replace such facilities and that the Park
Districtshall have no responsibility orobligation to maintain,repair,renew,
restore, or replace such facilities.
9. Drainage pipes over twelve inches in size must have a grate (approved by
Park District) and proper wing wall or rip rap.
10. Rough grading shall be in conformance with the Park District and city
specifications with a minimum of six inches of topsoil.
11. Fine grading and seeding shall be in conformance with Park District speci-
fications.
12. Culverts under a roadway will not need to be grated.
—Revised 9124190
3-13
Z � C
0CL 3a CL
11�
° ♦ flA trt � �
CL
RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED
ACTIVITY/ SPADE SIZE AND RECOMMENDED NO.OF UNITS PER SERVICE LOCATION
FACILITY REQUIREMENTS DIMENSIONS ORIENTATION POPULATION RADIUS NOTES
Badminton 1620.sq.ft. Singles—1r x 44' Long axis north-south 1 per 5000 X-x mile tAlragy ilt adteal,rte
with W —bas x cte rasdon eater,or chuMt
with n all sic unobstructed facility.Safe swilling .
area on all sides or bike aeeees.
Basketball
1.Youth 2400.3036 sq.ft. 46-50'x 84' Long axis north-south 1 per 5000 X-x mile Same s bedmimast.
2.High School 5040.7280 sq.ft. 50'x 84' Outdoor cowls in
3 com"iate 5600-7980 sq.It. SO x 94' neighborhood and crk►
with 5'unobstructed nrarntrly Mtk4 Plus
space on all sides
active recreation ens
M altef park Mtinge.
Handball 800 sq.ft.for 4-wall. 20'x 40'—Minimum Long is north-south. 1 per 20.000 15.30 minute traits 4WAN usually indoor
(34 wall) 1000 for 3-well of 19 to raw of 3-systl Front wall at north and. time as part of ou khaarpose
court.Minimum 20' faciaty.Xwen�y
overhead Nearrlee. outdoor in park or
school setting.
Ice Mackey 22,000 sq.ft.including Rink 85'x 200' Long axis north-south Indoor-1 per 100,000. %-1 hour trawl time C*naM important
support area. (minimum 85 x 185.1. if outdoor Outdoor—depends on consideration affecting
Additional 5000 sq.ft. climate. nm of units.Oat as
support area. part of multivAllon
fadhy.
Tawas Minimum of 7.200 36'x 780.17 clearance Long axis north-tooth. 1 court per 2000. X-x mile But ill betarris of 2-4.
SQ.ft.single court. on bah sides;21' Located i1
(2 sores for complex.) clearance on both ends Park
r adiacwtt tP sdww
• site.
Volleyball Minimum of 4,000 30'x W.Minimum 6' Long axis north-south 1 court per 5000. X.X mile Same s otter toowt
q.ft. - clearance on all aids. activities leg.,bad-
minton,basketball,etc.)
Sauball
1.Official 3.0.3.85 A minimum a Baselines-90' Locate home plate so 1 per 5000 %-X mile Part of rtaigllbaslttl00
Pitching distance— pitcher throwing
60 X' aonlptat.Li/sasA
across sun and bettai Lighted-1 per 30.000 fields part of coot.
Foul linos—min.320' not facing it.Line from enmity Center field- 00 4 + home plate thragh
2.Little League 1.2 A minimum a Bselins-.6C l itdufs mound run
Pitching distance-49 east•nortt"40.
Foul lines-200'
Center field-2W.
250'
Field Hockey Minimum 1.5A 180'x 300'with a Fall sewn—long axis 1 per 20,000 15.30 minutes travel Usually part of bow
minimum of 10' northwest to southeast. time ball,football,sr7CM
clearance on all sides. For longer periods, complex in eorrarwnity
north to south. - Perk or to atWowa
high seI ,.
Football Minimum 1.5A 180'x 360'with a Same as field hockey. 1 per 20,000 15.30 minutes travel Same as field beskay.
minimum of 6' time
alaarOnce on all tides.
fieaar 1.7 to 2.11A 196'to 225'x 330'to Soma as field hockey. 1 Per 10.000 1.2 miles
300'with a Ur mini. Number of units do-
mum clearance on all Pads on Populrity. _
✓- sides. Youth tooaer on eraau-
'�
or fields eAacen.10
rJwo4
or rtelalrbow
:...x......, hood perks.
:felt-pMM Ranhaa 735A tea mMimum or 90C x 690'wide.Add Lone axis south-west- /per 60,000 30 mMwtas teahiel time Post of self Mesea
_. 25 teis 17 width for each northeast with golfer compose.As a aslawlso.. -
additional tee, driving toward north unit.MW be aahmeeMY -
r oast. OPWOIINL
%-Mile Running Tract 4.3A Overall width-276' Long axis in sector 1 per 20,000 15.30 minutes trawl Usually,part of high
length-600.02' from north to south time school,or in cola
Track width for 8 to 4 to north-west-south mumty Park complex
lanes is 37. east with finish line in combination with
at northerly end. football,soccer.etc.
Softball 1.5 to 2.OA Baselines-60' Same as baseball. 1 per 5,000(if Oho %-%mile Slight difference in
Pitching distance-4V used for youth dimensions for IV'
min.40'-women. baseball) slow pitch.May also
Fast pitch field radius be used for youth
from Wale-225' boo".
between foul lines.
Slow pitch-275'Inten)
250'(women)
Multiple Recreation %W sq.ft. 12(r x W Long axis of courts 1 per 10.000 1.2 miles.
Court with printery use is
(basketball,volleyball. northsouth.
aemW
Trails N/A Well defined head max- N/A 1 system per region N/A
imam/0'width,maxi-
mum overage grads 5%
not to exceed 1S%.
Capacity rural trails-
40 hikonMay/mile.
Urban trails-90 hikers/
day/mile.
Archery Range Minimum 0.65A 300'length x minimum Archer facing north /per 50,000 30 minutes trawl time Part of a reakmelf
10'wide between ter- r or.450. maer0 part cwnpfax•
gets.Roped dear space
on sides of tangs mini-
mum of Mr.dew space
behind targets minimum
of 90'x 45'with
bunker.
Combination Skeet and Minimum 30A All walks and stnwhares Center line of length 1 par 50,000 30 minutes travel time Part of a regional/
Trap Field occur within an arcs rums nortlheest-muthh-
metro pert complex.
IB statiahhl approxkn Rely 130' west with shoots
wide by 115'deep.Min- facing northeast.
knon cleared area is
ews-i ed within two
superimposed segments
with 100-yard radii 14
acres).Shot-fall danger
zone is contained with-
in two operimposed
segments with 3006yard
radii(36 acres).
Goal
/.Per 3118-Hale) a 50-60A a Average Is irb-ry Majority of holes on — %to 1 hour trawt time a 9-hole cause cee
600.2700 yards north oath axis. aeeomntaodoe 360
ptapleMatr.
Z 84hole stenhdand a Minimum SOA a Avsrpe length-2250 a 1/25.000 a 184tole course an
yam accommodese fly
S50 people edgy.
3.184mle standard a Minimum 110A a Average length-6500 01150.000 Course may be loosed
-yards in cortanunity or distl k:
park.but should not be
over 20 miles from
population center.
Swimming Pooh Varies on sae of pool Teeching-minimum of None--although care /par 20.000 15 to 30 minutes travel Pools for general cone•
and amenities.Usually 25 yards x 45'even must be taken in siting (Poole should aoeom- time munity use should be
%to 2A site. depth of 3 to 4 test of lifeguard stations in modate 3 to 5%of total plwue I for teaching
Competitive-minimum relation to afternoon population at a time.) co IFetidve.and raps'
of 25m x 16m.Minimum sun, atonal purposes with
of 27 sluare feet of anaon-of depth 13.4m)to
water surface per swim- accommodate 1m and -
er.Ratios of 2:1 dads 3mdihdrg boards.Lo-
vs.water. ached in cOWAPAl Y
park or school site.
Beach Area N/A Beach area should have NIA N/A N/A Should ham fend bot-
50 sq.ft.of land and tan with slope a max•
50 sq.ft.of water per krum of S%(flat
user.Turnover rate is preferable).Boating
3.There should be 34A area completely sag•
supporting land per A ragetad from swknming .
of beach. Oren.
PLAN 'COMMISSION MEETING to - 94
' P/A PC,,�?a1 PCgS/"9 PgAl- PC PC PC
HAROLD FELTZ I P f
GEORGE STEWART
CLARENCE HOLDIMAN I p
DON AMENT
LAWRENCE LANGLAND p 4
SANDRA ADAMS _.
i
MICHAEL CROUCH 10
TOM LINDBLOOM �f
RALPH PFISTER _
ANNE LUCIETTO 1 /-
DAVE DOCKSTADER P
GREG KRABER i — --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTFWS PRESENT:
ti
. PUBLIC HEARING /SIGN-IN SHEET
NAME ADDRESS
Zf,
I/ ea:zz /0/� <��We 92*4 Y67,A71le