Loading...
Plan Commission Minutes 1994 06-15-94 MINUTES OF THE PLAN COMMISSION OF THE UNITED CITY OF THE VILLAGE OF YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS HELD AT THE KENDALL COUNTY BOARD ROOM JUNE 15, 1994 7:00 P.M. The June meeting of the Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Harold Feltz with the following members in attendance: Harold Feltz, Clarence Holdiman, Don Ament, Lawrence Langland, Michael Crouch, Tom Lindbloom, Anne Lucietto;Dave Dockstader Others Present: Alderman Baker, Alderman Prochaska, Acting Administrator/Police Chief Graff, Consulting Engineer Bill Schmanski, Planning Consultant Jeff Palmquist; Attorney Hiles Chairman Feltz asked if there were any additions or corrections to be made to the May minutes. Chairman Feltz stated on the front page the comment Doc Davis made about going over the covenants of the property I would like to put after that the covenants of the property after it was approved by the City and Planning Commission this concern was during and after construction. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further additions or corrections to be made. Hearing none, the motion was made to approve the amended minutes by Larry Langland; seconded Clarence Holdiman. Voice vote carried. PC94-12 - Annex&Zone Kendall Co. Ag to City R-2 - George& Sandra Stewart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here for the public hearing on this property. Hearing no one, Chairman Feltz stated we would take this up later this evening if anyone does show up. PC93-21 - Dwyer- Country Hills- Preliminary Plan& Traffic Study ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here representing this property. Jack Kusak with McClure Engineering stated he took the list of items that need to be resolved from last months Planning Commission meeting and has addressed all of them. Jack stated they have the dedicated right-of-ways, an easement for a walk way, detention sizing, dedicated right of ways for the street extension, IDOT review, extension of water main thru lot 7 & 8, street lights at Route 71, duplexes with garage, sewer capacity down stream, burming along Route 71 and a park in the north west corner and a total land contribution of approximately 2.5 acres and the remainder given in cash per the ordinance and the 5 year detention area not be included in the 2.5 acres. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any questions or comments on this property. Chairman Feltz asked how the sewer capacity worked out. Bill Schmanski stated the 10" line that's proposed thru the site will serve the properties to the south and east. Chairman Feltz asked Bill Schmanski if he felt confident with this. Bill replied yes. Jeff Palmquist stated on the preliminary plan the park acres with out the detention is not 2.5 acres it is 1.7 acres. Jack Kusack stated there might be some distortion on the computer printout of the drawing. Jack stated we will do what ever it takes to get the park to 2.5 acres. Tony Graff asked if the park would be done in phase 1 or phase 2. Jack stated yes, but will the road be finished. Jack stated he would like to request that they be allowed to have a temporary turn around on that street. Jeff asked is there a tree conservation. Jack replied yes. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments on this parcel. Jack stated he would like to let the record show the additional lot to be done in phase one to incorporate the park. They are lots 74, 75, 76, 79, 80, 81, 82& 83. Chairman Feltz asked Bill Schmanski&Jeff Palmquist if there would be any reason why we could not approve the preliminary from your stand point knowing they have some things to bring in for the final. Bill replied he sees no reason not to. Jeff agreed with Bill. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments on this parcel. Hearing none, the motion was made to recommend to the City Council the approval of the preliminary plan subject to the following: 1) Pedestrian easement/walk ways 2) Park 2.5 acres 3) Tree conservation 4) Phase 1 to include the additional lots 5) The temporary turn around 6) The tile easement 7) IDOT review 8) Route 71 lights 9) Detailed landscape plan at final by Lawrence Langland; seconded Clarence Holdiman. Roll call vote: Feltz - yes Holdiman - yes Ament - yes Langland - yes Crouch-yes Lindbloom-yes Lucietto -yes Dockstader-yes Motion carried 8-0 PC94-12 - Annex&Zone from Kendall Co. Ag to City R-2- George& Sandra Stewart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chairman Feltz asked if there is anyone here for the public hearing of PC94-12. Tom Lindbloom stated at some point we need to say this will be postponed to a later date. There are a few people here for this public hearing. Chairman Feltz agreed. Tom Lindbloom made the motion to postpone the public hearing and renotify everyone when this date will be; seconded Don Ament. Voice vote carried. PC94-9 - OSNB Trust#5358-Wehrli- Green Briar P.U.D./Preliminary Plan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here to represent this property. John Bajor with Morris Engineering stated the Green Briar P.U.D is 76. acre tract of land located approximately 1000 feet west of Route 47 bordered to the north by section 32. The property is currently zoned A-1 and is proposed to be zoned for single family homes R-2 and duplexes R-2D. The duplexes are proposed along the east boundary of the P.U.D. to buffer the proposed single family use of the remainder of the P.U.D. from the existing commercial use to the east of the PUD parcel. John stated the ingress and egress to the subdivision is proposed to be constructed due west of Route 47 through construction of a 2400 ft. road with a 100 ft. right of way which would bisect with the south property line of Green Briar P.U.D. All interior roads are 60ft R.O.W. to provide adequate space for all utilities as shown on the various plan sheets. The roads and cul-de-sacs have been designed to conform to village standards. John stated the parcel drains very well to the north. The proposed design makes good use of an existing basin at the northwest portion of the P.U.D. to provide adequate detention of stormwater. No wetlands or floodplain exists within the parcel. Detention for the parcel has been provided throughout the design of detention areas A and B. Detention area A provides 2.45 acres-feet of storage volume for the 100 year event, detention area B provides 7.16 acre-feet. Collectively the detention areas provide a total of 9.61 acre-feet of detention. John stated an 8" DIP watermain runs parallel to and approximately 20 ft. northeast of Green Briar's northeast property line. It is proposed that this tap on opportunity be considered. This low pressure zone is approximately 46 psi. A 12" DIP watermain runs parallel to and on the east side of Route 47. As we wish to "Loop" the internal water distribution system and this 12" main is high pressure, a pressure regulating valve is required. It is proposed that this extension be looped via the access road to the south. All hydrants have been placed in accordance with the 400 foot maximum spacing requirement and at intersections and dead ends. A loop has been incorporated between the terminal bulbs of the cul-de-sacs named Hawthorn Court and Buchthorn Court. A 20 foot maintenance easement has been provided. The main subdivision water pipe is a 10 inch main running fully along Green Briar Way. This main is to be connected to the north at the existing water main within a permanent easement along the northeast parcel property line. Water main valves and vaults have been planned to provide good operating opportunities and minimum service disruption to the residents during repairs on the system. John stated a 12" sanitary sewer exists to the northeast and within the property limits of the subdivision. The subdivision sanitary sewer is designed to flow to the connection point. A 12" sanitary sewer within an easement will connect with the major 10" sanitary sewer which runs along Green Briar Way and sewers the development. All manholes are placed a maximum of 400 feet apart and at intersections. The manholes will be furnished with chimney seals to prevent inflow and infiltration. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any questions or comments regarding this parcel. Larry Langland asked if they we're still going to keep the trees. John replied yes. Anne Lucietto asked if they checked there street names with the street names the City already has. John replied not, but they will. Chairman Feltz stated he is reluctant to approve the preliminary because of the road to match up from across the street. Tony stated that everyone is basically in agreement to an easement and a right of way they only thing open for negotiation is the actual recapture amounts and were negotiating with them now. Chairman Feltz stated he wants to make sure City Council is aware that if these roads do not line up with one another, the Planning Commission will not approve it. Chairman Feltz asked if there were any further questions or comments. Hearing none the motion was made to recommend the approval of the preliminary plan to the City Council subject to the following: 1) Matching roads 2) Tree line left in 3) Lot 73 easement 4) Increase lot size by adjustment by Anne Lucietto; seconded Michael Crouch. Roll call vote: Feltz - yes Holdiman - yes Ament - yes Langland- no Crouch - yes Lindbloom-no Lucietto -yes Dockstader-yes Motion carried 6-2 PC94-4 - Countryside Center-Blackberry Creek North Final Plat ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chairman Feltz asked if there was anyone here representing this parcel. Dallas Ingemunson asked Bill Schmanski if he had talked to the Engineers for Deuchler about the landscaping and burm. Bill Schmanski replied we really didn't talk about anything except very few details. Chairman Feltz asked if the Recreation Board was happy with money they will receive. Dave Dockstader replied yes. Tony Graff stated the money came to about$50,000.00. Chairman Feltz asked Jeff Palmquist if he had any concerns with the plan. Jeff replied no. Chairman Feltz asked Bill Schmanski if he had any concerns with the engineering. Bill replied he has seen no engineering. Chairman Feltz stated we'll wait until next month to take any action pending on the engineering review. Park Guidelines/Lannert Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JeffPalmquist stated in an effort to assist the City of Yorkville in better understanding and planning for parks and open space, I have provided the Park Guidelines. (See attached) Chairman Feltz asked if there were any questions or comments on these guidelines. Hearing none, Chairman Feltz thanked Jeff for coming up with these guidelines. Fox Hill P.U.D. - Landscape Review ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chairman Feltz stated we approved the final plat of the Fox Hill P.U.D. for phase one. Jeff didn't have the landscape plan at that time. Jeff Palmquist stated there are five things that needs to be complied with they are as follows: 1) Compliance with preliminary plan 2) Design 3) Types of species for landscaping 4) Need landscaping in there green spaces 5) Recommend the developer address these recommendations outlined above prior to approval of final plat With no further comments evident on the topics listed on tonight's agenda, Chairman Felts adjourned the meeting at 10:00 P.M. Ki King, Reco in cretary 't Lannert Group •LAND PLANNING •LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE June 2, 1994 .CIVIL ENGINEERING •COMMUNITY CONSULTING •DEVELOPMENT Mr. Tony Graff MANAGEMENT City of Yorkville 610 Tower Lane Yorkville, IL 60560 RE: Park Guidelines - Job #9497A Dear Tony: In an effort to assist the City of Yorkville in better understanding and planning for parks and open space, I have provided the following attachments: 1. Fox Valley Park District Standards (pg. 3-1) Note the criteria on this page. The FVPD land dedication standard, like Yorkville's is ten acres per 1,000 persons. The FVPD "allocates" these ten acres by the ratio of 5.5 acres for sub-neighborhood and neighborhood parks and 4.5 acres for community parks. Also, notice that the minimum size of a sub-neighborhood or neighborhood park is four acres. The FVPD does not accept any park dedication under four acres. In addition, the FVPD prefers these parks to be rectangular in shape. Based upon our experiences with the FVPD, they take an active role in the development process ensuring that any dedication conforms as closely as possible to their criteria. The last criteria of note on this page is the service area standard for these sub-neighborhood and neighborhood parks (1/2-mile walking distance). Also, during a recent phone conversation with the FVPD's planner, he revealed another noteworthy guideline. In the layout of any park, they try to provide a minimum of 100 feet between a park element (i.e. playground, court, ballfield) and a residential lot. This is a very reasonable guideline and, if applied to small parks such as that which may be part of the Dwyer subdivision, suggests that at least 1.25 acres of area would be required to accommodate Just a tot lot. THE LANNERT GROUP 311 NORTH 2ND STREET SUITE 300 ST. CHARLES, IL 60174 708 377.6900 FAX 708 377.7131 Page 2 Tony Graff June 2, 1994 2. Open Space Classifications (pg. 3-4) This page illustrates one method of classifying open space in terms of local open space and regional open space. This classification is part of the foundation of any park and open space master plan. 3. FVPD Criteria for the Acceptance of Dedicated Lands This page describes the development criteria which must be met prior to acceptance of a site by the FVPD. 4. FVPD Criteria for Construction of Stormwater Lake Retention Areas (pg. 3-9, 3-10) This list of criteria should be self-explanatory. 5. FVPD Criteria for Construction of Blue-Green Stormwater Detention Areas (p. 3-13) This list of criteria should also be self-explanatory. 6. Appendix A - Suggested Facility Development Standards (from National Recreation and Park Association) This two-page list provides general planning standards for a wide range of activities. One facility missing is a typical arrangement of consolidated play equipment. A small "typical" equipment area within a tot lot is roughly 30 feet by 40 feet. Note the suggested service radii for facilities such as basketball (1/4-1/2 mile), softball (1/4 - 1/2 mile), and tennis (1/4 -1/2 mile). What do all these criteria and guidelines suggest? As consulting planners, we have difficulty evaluating the proposed or potential park/open space components of proposed subdivisions. Without standards or guidelines, we find ourselves engaging in ad hoc park planning. Collectively, we do not know what the community's needs, ideas, values, and goals for park and open space development are. Therefore, our foremost recommendation is for the City and/or the recreation department to formulate a park, open space, and recreation master plan. Such a master plan includes elements such as goals and objectives, inventory of existing resources, open space criteria, and a master development plan. We shall gladly assist in the formulation of such a plan at the earliest possible opportunity. Page 3 Tony Graff June 2, 19'94 Indeed, as the planner for the Fox Valley Park District tells me, there is significant LAWCON grant money available for park and open space development. However, a criterion for eligibility is a park master plan. Of course, we understand the problem of limited resources and funding. If the master plan is presently unrealistic, we nevertheless encourage the recreation board to formulate criteria for acceptance of dedicated lands, criteria for stormwater retention/detention, and general guidelines for the community-wide distribution of recreation facilities. We, again, shall gladly assist in the task. The recreation board is also faced with the more immediate task of reviewing potential park dedications for the Dwyer, Purcell, and Werhli subdivisions. We recommend that the recreation board first determine the appropriate recreation facilities for each of these areas. Once the facility sizes and appropriate buffer and passive "green" areas are determined, the overall park size and general configuration can be ascertained. I have offered the services of The Lannert Group to assist in any overall park/recreation planning. I am happy to also address the recreation board and/or council regarding these issues. Since r Jreyyy D. Pal quist, AICP Vice President Community Consulting JP:clb Enclosures 7 cc: Mayor Kittoe Jeff Baker Harold Feltz Dan Kramer b:prkguidl.ltr PARK STANDARDS In order for park officials to be responsive to present and future Recreation Open Space needs,they must have some kind of guidelines. Standards,based on a population ratio,appear to be the best solution. Standards are flexible guides for the planning and acquisition of park, recreation and open space areas. in general the standards seek to furnish ten(10)acres of permanent publicly owned park and open space for each one thousand residents. The 10 acres should be further allocated as 5.5 acres for Neighborhood Open Space and 4.5.acres for Community Open Space. The following table illustrates the standards as they relate to population served,size range,service area, and open space designation. 'J'2v. ••7�h Y ;{SF i3::v nr', Yi:' 7{�,••: v:... .ryf.:�}•: �•.. ...G}.�.... 1,:'• +{fir ' : ,f yy 'k•.Cv}i�j,•.i.•`': }�1' jf+ -• • a••,�k ky��}Jj�:i }�.••C-..ji.'$St�:;.}, .. }':... :• SUB-NEIGHBORHOOD LOCAL CLASSIFICATION NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY Designation Mini Park Community Park Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park/School Community Park/School Size Range 4 acres minimum to 15-200 acres 15 acres Acres per 1,000 pop. 5.5* 4.5* Population Served 800-2700 3000+ Service Area Neighborhood: within 15 minutes driving time 1/2 mile walking distance The use of these standards by this District is most appropriate due to the local municipalities' mandatory land dedication ordinances. These ordinances have as a basis the population ratio standards. However,the precise application of standards is often impractical. The importance of local factors must also be included in consideringfuture park and open space needs and appropriate adjustments must be made accordingly if these standards are to be useful. Consideration should be given to the following in the total planning process: • Expressed needs and desires of the citizens • New trends or patterns in recreation • Time—distance from park • Private facilities • Socio-economic factors • Quantity and quality of existing • Special local conditions facilities In the next chapter a more complete analysis of need is established for both neighborhood and community facilities and along with the use of these standards appropriate recommendations can be made for the Comprehensive Open Space Master Plan. 3-1 OPEN SPACE CLASSIFICATIONS Recreation and Conservation/Protection Open Space can be subdivided into more detailed categories based upon the use for which the land is intended. The classification code has been developed to identify,categorize and assign the open space uses,functions of the land,and governmental responsibility. The classifications are intended to serve as a guide for all government agencies involved in open space. Local Open Space Classifications RECREATION FUNCTION 1. Sub-Neighborhood Designation: Mini Park 2. Neighborhood Designation: Neighborhood Park,Neighborhood Park/School 3. Community Designation: Community Park,Community Park/School 4. Linear Designation: Linear Park,Recreation Trail 5. Community-Wide Special: Golf Course,Sports Complex,Winter Sports Complex, Nature Center,Community Center,Aquatic Center,etc. b. Private Designation: Golf Course,Fishing Park,Aquatic Center,etc. CONSERVATION/PROTECTION FUNCTION 1. Conservation/Protection Marsh,Lake,River Shoreline,Floodplain,Fond, Designation: Woodlot,etc. Regional Open Space Classifications RECREATION FUNCTION 1. Forest Preserve Designation: Preserves,Lakes,Picnic Areas,Nature Centers,Winter Sports Area 2. Linear Designation: Linear Park,Recreation Trail 3. Private Designation: Parks,Campgrounds,RV Parks,Resorts,Skiing Slopes, Marinas,Tennis Centers CONSERVATION/PROTECTION FUNCTION 1. Forest Preserve Designation: Preserves,Wildlife Preserves,Arboretums, Nature Centers 2. Linear Park&Recreation Trails Designation: Linear Parks,Recreation Trails 3. Conservation&Protection Designation: Natural Areas,Preserves,Scenic Rivers/Creeks 3---4 FVPD CRITERIA FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATED LANDS The following criteria shall be applied to property dedicated to the District via the Municipal land/ Cash Ordinance of Aurora, North Aurora and Montgomery. 1. All land must be free from detention or retention requirements and be above the 100 year flood level. 2. land should be contiguous and in a configuration to allow for the development of the proposed recreational components. 3. Neighborhood and Community Parks shall have a minimum of 25%of the total perimeter directly fronting on a public roadway.Additional access should be provided as needed. 4. Minimum secondary access should be 60 feet. 5. All park property shall be fully improved including: Roads Sidewalks* Availability of all utilities Street trees* 6"of topsoil--rough graded,fine graded,and seeded** 6. The grade and topography of the site shal I be engineered by the developer for the District's approval: a. No slope shall be in excess of 4:1. b. The site shall be graded so that water does not pond and will have positive drainage. 7. Park sites shall not be used as borrow pits for clay or any other building material and shall be stable enough to support the proposed park improvements. * If included in the balance of the subdivision. ** The developer may elect to have the District fine grade and seed the park, with Park Distrkt concurrence,andcompensate the District for the workat a rateagreed upon atthe time ofdedication agreement. 3-8 FVPD CRITERIA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF STORM WATER LAKE RETENTION AREAS The developer shall submit a lake design plan to the Fox Valley Park District that shall show the following: 1. 1'topography contours 2. Normal water level 3. 100 year flood level 4. Inlet and outlet locations 5. Design details for inlet and outlet structures 6. Certification by registered engineer 7. Date,scale and north arrow 8. Property boundaries and acreages 9. Cross-section elevation through the mid point of the lake The Fox Valley Park District Board will base its approval upon the following criteria: 1. Side slope above water level shall be between 6:1 and 10:1. 2. Slope below water level shall be 2:1. 3. A 4'wide, level safety ledge shall be provided at a 3'depth. 4. Minimum lake area shall be 3 acres. 5. 25%of the lake shall be at least 12'deep.The balance of the lake bottom shall be at least 8'deep. 6. Provision for erosion protection at inlets and outlets. Design must meet or exceed city's criteria and guarantee requirements. 7. A 30'buildable area shall be provided around the lake above the 100 year flood level. 8. 250 of the land in the lake park shall be above the 100 year flood level.This land would be exclusive of the 30'buildable area. 9. Provision for multi-purpose recreational use.Must be contiguous with park land. 10. The plans for the lake must meet the technical approval of the municipalities'engineering department. 11. Three copies of the final plans shall be submitted to the Fox Valley Park District twenty-one (21)days prior to any action by the Board of Trustees. 12. Any inlets or outlets in excess of eighteen(18)inches shall have a safety grating. 13. Any lakes with a water shed of 10 acres or more shall have a mechanical drop box type spillway.The spillway shall be equipped with a safety grate. 14. Al I lakes with a dam shal I have an emergency spi llwayto proteathe dam.The spillway shal I be sod and shall be designed to accommodate the 50 year storm. 15. The developers shall notify the District forty-eight(48) hours prior to the start of and during key phases of construction. 3-9 FVPD CRITERIA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BLUE-GREEN STORM WATER DETENTION AREAS Blue-Green detention areas are turf detention basins which,after storm events,drain within a maximum of 24 hours.The basins are then available for recreational use.No credit toward municipal land cash obligation shall be given for blue-green detention.Detention areas shall be designed with functional required park land.No stand alone facilities will be considered. The developer shall submit an engineering plan to the Fox Valley Park District that shalI show the following: 1. 1' topography contours 2. Normal water level 3. 100, 50 and 10 year flood levels 4. Inlet and outlet locations 5. Design details for inlet and outlet structures 6. Certification by registered engineer 7. Date, scale and north arrow 8. All property boundaries and acreage The following criteria on the design of the Blue-Green area shall be in effect: 1. A minimum of 25%of the Blue-Green park shall be above the 100 year storm level. 2. Total release of 100 year storm shall be a maximum time of 24 hours. 3. Side slopes should be a minimum of 4:1 for 75%of basin,and 6:1 for 25%. 4. Plans or specifications shall comply with any applicable city or village ordinances. 5. Sites shall have 25%of perimeter open to public streets. 6. Secondary access points shall be a minimum of 60' wide. 7. Bottom slope of the Blue-Green areas will have a minimum of a 2%slope for positive drainage to the outfall. 8. Storm water drainage piping and appurtenances within the park shall be dedicated to the applicable city or village at the time of final plat of subdivision or at the time of dedication of land to the Park District. It is understood that the village or city will accept dedication of the storm water drainage piping and appurtenances and will assume responsibility to main- tain, repair, renew, restore, and replace such facilities and that the Park Districtshall have no responsibility orobligation to maintain,repair,renew, restore, or replace such facilities. 9. Drainage pipes over twelve inches in size must have a grate (approved by Park District) and proper wing wall or rip rap. 10. Rough grading shall be in conformance with the Park District and city specifications with a minimum of six inches of topsoil. 11. Fine grading and seeding shall be in conformance with Park District speci- fications. 12. Culverts under a roadway will not need to be grated. —Revised 9124190 3-13 Z � C 0CL 3a CL 11� ° ♦ flA trt � � CL RECOMMENDED RECOMMENDED ACTIVITY/ SPADE SIZE AND RECOMMENDED NO.OF UNITS PER SERVICE LOCATION FACILITY REQUIREMENTS DIMENSIONS ORIENTATION POPULATION RADIUS NOTES Badminton 1620.sq.ft. Singles—1r x 44' Long axis north-south 1 per 5000 X-x mile tAlragy ilt adteal,rte with W —bas x cte rasdon eater,or chuMt with n all sic unobstructed facility.Safe swilling . area on all sides or bike aeeees. Basketball 1.Youth 2400.3036 sq.ft. 46-50'x 84' Long axis north-south 1 per 5000 X-x mile Same s bedmimast. 2.High School 5040.7280 sq.ft. 50'x 84' Outdoor cowls in 3 com"iate 5600-7980 sq.It. SO x 94' neighborhood and crk► with 5'unobstructed nrarntrly Mtk4 Plus space on all sides active recreation ens M altef park Mtinge. Handball 800 sq.ft.for 4-wall. 20'x 40'—Minimum Long is north-south. 1 per 20.000 15.30 minute traits 4WAN usually indoor (34 wall) 1000 for 3-well of 19 to raw of 3-systl Front wall at north and. time as part of ou khaarpose court.Minimum 20' faciaty.Xwen�y overhead Nearrlee. outdoor in park or school setting. Ice Mackey 22,000 sq.ft.including Rink 85'x 200' Long axis north-south Indoor-1 per 100,000. %-1 hour trawl time C*naM important support area. (minimum 85 x 185.1. if outdoor Outdoor—depends on consideration affecting Additional 5000 sq.ft. climate. nm of units.Oat as support area. part of multivAllon fadhy. Tawas Minimum of 7.200 36'x 780.17 clearance Long axis north-tooth. 1 court per 2000. X-x mile But ill betarris of 2-4. SQ.ft.single court. on bah sides;21' Located i1 (2 sores for complex.) clearance on both ends Park r adiacwtt tP sdww • site. Volleyball Minimum of 4,000 30'x W.Minimum 6' Long axis north-south 1 court per 5000. X.X mile Same s otter toowt q.ft. - clearance on all aids. activities leg.,bad- minton,basketball,etc.) Sauball 1.Official 3.0.3.85 A minimum a Baselines-90' Locate home plate so 1 per 5000 %-X mile Part of rtaigllbaslttl00 Pitching distance— pitcher throwing 60 X' aonlptat.Li/sasA across sun and bettai Lighted-1 per 30.000 fields part of coot. Foul linos—min.320' not facing it.Line from enmity Center field- 00 4 + home plate thragh 2.Little League 1.2 A minimum a Bselins-.6C l itdufs mound run Pitching distance-49 east•nortt"40. Foul lines-200' Center field-2W. 250' Field Hockey Minimum 1.5A 180'x 300'with a Fall sewn—long axis 1 per 20,000 15.30 minutes travel Usually part of bow minimum of 10' northwest to southeast. time ball,football,sr7CM clearance on all sides. For longer periods, complex in eorrarwnity north to south. - Perk or to atWowa high seI ,. Football Minimum 1.5A 180'x 360'with a Same as field hockey. 1 per 20,000 15.30 minutes travel Same as field beskay. minimum of 6' time alaarOnce on all tides. fieaar 1.7 to 2.11A 196'to 225'x 330'to Soma as field hockey. 1 Per 10.000 1.2 miles 300'with a Ur mini. Number of units do- mum clearance on all Pads on Populrity. _ ✓- sides. Youth tooaer on eraau- '� or fields eAacen.10 rJwo4 or rtelalrbow :...x......, hood perks. :felt-pMM Ranhaa 735A tea mMimum or 90C x 690'wide.Add Lone axis south-west- /per 60,000 30 mMwtas teahiel time Post of self Mesea _. 25 teis 17 width for each northeast with golfer compose.As a aslawlso.. - additional tee, driving toward north unit.MW be aahmeeMY - r oast. OPWOIINL %-Mile Running Tract 4.3A Overall width-276' Long axis in sector 1 per 20,000 15.30 minutes trawl Usually,part of high length-600.02' from north to south time school,or in cola Track width for 8 to 4 to north-west-south mumty Park complex lanes is 37. east with finish line in combination with at northerly end. football,soccer.etc. Softball 1.5 to 2.OA Baselines-60' Same as baseball. 1 per 5,000(if Oho %-%mile Slight difference in Pitching distance-4V used for youth dimensions for IV' min.40'-women. baseball) slow pitch.May also Fast pitch field radius be used for youth from Wale-225' boo". between foul lines. Slow pitch-275'Inten) 250'(women) Multiple Recreation %W sq.ft. 12(r x W Long axis of courts 1 per 10.000 1.2 miles. Court with printery use is (basketball,volleyball. northsouth. aemW Trails N/A Well defined head max- N/A 1 system per region N/A imam/0'width,maxi- mum overage grads 5% not to exceed 1S%. Capacity rural trails- 40 hikonMay/mile. Urban trails-90 hikers/ day/mile. Archery Range Minimum 0.65A 300'length x minimum Archer facing north /per 50,000 30 minutes trawl time Part of a reakmelf 10'wide between ter- r or.450. maer0 part cwnpfax• gets.Roped dear space on sides of tangs mini- mum of Mr.dew space behind targets minimum of 90'x 45'with bunker. Combination Skeet and Minimum 30A All walks and stnwhares Center line of length 1 par 50,000 30 minutes travel time Part of a regional/ Trap Field occur within an arcs rums nortlheest-muthh- metro pert complex. IB statiahhl approxkn Rely 130' west with shoots wide by 115'deep.Min- facing northeast. knon cleared area is ews-i ed within two superimposed segments with 100-yard radii 14 acres).Shot-fall danger zone is contained with- in two operimposed segments with 3006yard radii(36 acres). Goal /.Per 3118-Hale) a 50-60A a Average Is irb-ry Majority of holes on — %to 1 hour trawt time a 9-hole cause cee 600.2700 yards north oath axis. aeeomntaodoe 360 ptapleMatr. Z 84hole stenhdand a Minimum SOA a Avsrpe length-2250 a 1/25.000 a 184tole course an yam accommodese fly S50 people edgy. 3.184mle standard a Minimum 110A a Average length-6500 01150.000 Course may be loosed -yards in cortanunity or distl k: park.but should not be over 20 miles from population center. Swimming Pooh Varies on sae of pool Teeching-minimum of None--although care /par 20.000 15 to 30 minutes travel Pools for general cone• and amenities.Usually 25 yards x 45'even must be taken in siting (Poole should aoeom- time munity use should be %to 2A site. depth of 3 to 4 test of lifeguard stations in modate 3 to 5%of total plwue I for teaching Competitive-minimum relation to afternoon population at a time.) co IFetidve.and raps' of 25m x 16m.Minimum sun, atonal purposes with of 27 sluare feet of anaon-of depth 13.4m)to water surface per swim- accommodate 1m and - er.Ratios of 2:1 dads 3mdihdrg boards.Lo- vs.water. ached in cOWAPAl Y park or school site. Beach Area N/A Beach area should have NIA N/A N/A Should ham fend bot- 50 sq.ft.of land and tan with slope a max• 50 sq.ft.of water per krum of S%(flat user.Turnover rate is preferable).Boating 3.There should be 34A area completely sag• supporting land per A ragetad from swknming . of beach. Oren. PLAN 'COMMISSION MEETING to - 94 ' P/A PC,,�?a1 PCgS/"9 PgAl- PC PC PC HAROLD FELTZ I P f GEORGE STEWART CLARENCE HOLDIMAN I p DON AMENT LAWRENCE LANGLAND p 4 SANDRA ADAMS _. i MICHAEL CROUCH 10 TOM LINDBLOOM �f RALPH PFISTER _ ANNE LUCIETTO 1 /- DAVE DOCKSTADER P GREG KRABER i — -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OTFWS PRESENT: ti . PUBLIC HEARING /SIGN-IN SHEET NAME ADDRESS Zf, I/ ea:zz /0/� <��We 92*4 Y67,A71le