Loading...
Plan Commission Minutes 1981 07-28-81 YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS 60560 Dr. Robert Coleman Lawrence Langland James Kenton Robert J. Mahoney Mary K. Price Charles Beaudry Harold Feltz Gregg Gabel Dale Woodworth YORKVILLE PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE MEETING JULY 28, 1981 Chairman Robert Coleman opened the public hearing - Petition to Re-zone, Lot 1, Unit 1, Harker's Subdivision, from R-2 to R-3 to enable the petitioner„Charles Baird, to construct a two unit (duplex) building. He stated all objectors would be limited to five minutes each. Attorney Tom Grant, representing the petitioner, stated the lot was located at the intersection of Blaine and Harker Streets and that Mr. Baird proposed to constuct a two unit attached duplex. His son would occupy one unit - the other being used for rental purposes. He stated there was a drainage easement through the property. Mr. Grant said there were several reasons for requesting the rezoning; It is a large corner lot and they feel it is highly adequate for this type of building. If the lot were devel- oped, the neighborhood would be enhanced. Finally, because of the economics involved, they felt the cost would be prohibitive for a single family dwelling and they would like to utilize the lot to its fullest potential. He further stated that if this were done right, they did not feel there would be a diminuation of property values in the area. Mr. Gabel stated that if R-3 zoning were granted, we would be unable to prevent them from building a three unit dwelling because of the lot size as allowed by the zoning ordinance. Attorney Grant stated that if a special use permit was needed, they would request this and that they would follow through with their plans as presented to the plan commission. Ned Ash, a Harker Subdivision resident, stated that drainage is a real problem and that the ditch overflows. Mr. Grant responded that they would not build over the ditch. Dave Schindlbeck, resident, stated he felt the lot did not have the useable square footage for this type of building. He said there are other open lots available in the area and asked what would prevent other developers from requesting upward rezoning. Attorney Grant stated the plan commission had the option to either grant or deny the petition or to issue a special use permit. Dr. Coleman then read excerpts from Harker Subdivision - Declaration of Restrictions dated January 23, 1973. #1. "All lots ---- shall be used as residential lots----. All residences shall be single family dwellings ----. #12. The covenants herein contained are covenants which run with the land----. #13. These covenants are to run with the land ----- for a period of twenty five years ---- and said covenants shall automatically be extended for successive periods of ten years-----." Mr. Gabel stated we could not ignore this document and that the implications were terrific. Mr. Chuck Voreis, 510 Blaine Street, spokesman for the opposing residents, stated those present were opposed to the rezoning and submitted and read a petition from property owners of Harker's Subdivision opposing the request for rezoning. He stated a clear majority of the residents signed the petition and they all felt they lived in a single family residential area and so thought when they purchased or built their homes. He submitted a copy of the subdivision covenants and restrictions . Page 2 July 1981 to the plan commission and quoted several paragraphs from the document. He stated his group felt this document supported their position - that the subdivision was intended and designed to be a sin)le family residential area. He appealed to the plan commission to allow the residents to continue to live in the area as they thought they should and that they wanted to protect their investments now and in the future. Mr. Gabel asked why he felt a duplex would detract from their properties. Mr. Voreis responded he felt. this would set a precedent to allow other rezoning in the area, that there would be more traffic and congestion, and that it would change the character and stability of the area. Ned Ash stated he felt a precedent setting move was being asked. He said drainage problems already existed and that he felt it was an atypical piece of property. Mr. Feltz asked for a description of the proposed building. Mr. Baird stated it would be a two bedroom, two story brick duplex with attached garages. Dr. Coleman asked if there were any further questions of comments. As there were none, he closed the public hearing. Dr. Coleman called the regular meeting of the Yorkville Plan Commission to order. Those in attendance were Dr. Coleman, Mr. Feltz, Mrs. Price, Mr. Gabel, Mr. Kenton, Mr. Beaudry, Mr. Woodworth and Mr. Clarage. Mr. Feltz moved to approve the minutes of the May meeting and was seconded by Mr. Beaudry. All present voting aye. 81.4 Petition to Re-Zone, Lot 1, Unit 1, Harker's Subdivision from R-2 to R-3, C. Baird Mr. Woodworth stated he could understand their concerns regarding future multi- family rezonings because of the empty lots in the area. Mr. Clarage stated the plan commission could not make a judgment based on private deed covenants as that would be a civil matter. Mr. Kenton stated that spot zoning had to be stopped at some point. The city already contains platted duplex lots. This lo& was originally platted to be single family and it should be left this way. Mr. Feltz noted that both the covenants and the domino effect concerned him. Mr. Gabel stated that the precedent setting nature of the rezoning was a compelling argument against it. Mr. Beaudry noted that the vast majority of the residents in the subdivision were opposed to the rezoning. Mr. Kenton then moved to recommend that the city council.reject the petition to rezone from R-2 to R-3. Seconded by Mr. Gabel. A roll call vote was taken as follows: Mr. Kenton, yes; Mr. Feltz, yes; Mrs. Price, yes; Mr,. Gabel, yes; Mr. Beaudry, yes; Mr. Woodworth, yes; Dr. Coleman, yes. Petition denied unanimously. Mr. Kenton then moved to adjourn the meeting and was seconded by Mr. Woodworth. All present voting aye. Meeting adjourned. Betty Huston