Plan Council Minutes 1998 10-08-98 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
Committee Minutes - Plan Council
October 8, 1998
Meeting Location: City Conference
Time Convened: 9:38 a.m.
Time Adjourned: 11:39 a.m.
Attendees:
Jim Nanninga City Administrator
Bill Dettmer Building Inspector
Joe Wywrot City Engineer
Mike Hitzemann B.K.F.D.
Tim Fairfield B.K.F.P.D./E.M.S
Tony Graff Chief of Police
Mike Schoppe Schoppe Design
Frank Vitek Cannonball Citizen - Schlapp Rezoning
James Rohrbach Cannonball Citizen - Schlapp Rezoning
Alan Garrow Schlapp Rezoning
Brent Schalhamer Parfection Park
Alan Norton Cannonball Hill Developer
John Schumacher Siebert Engineers - Cannonball Hill
Parfection Park
Brent Schalhamer wants to add an 18 hole miniature golf course to his current
facility. Plans are drawn and are at the final site plan stage. There are some issues
to discuss, see memo attached. The existing clay tile field has three blowholes and
some tiles have collapsed. He would like to reroute the 6" line around the course
with corrugated piping. He doesn't feel anything needs to be done with the 4" line.
He feels that it collapsed because of the heavy equipment that came in to put in the
sanitary sewer. He would like some leeway to get this repaired. Joe felt there was
no way of knowing why the tiles collapsed, but the clay tiles do cut across the NE
corner of the proposed course. For Brent's own protection, if he wants to leave it
where it is or go around the course then he would want to replace it with a more
durable pipe that won't collapse. Brent wanted clarification on the type of pipe to
-1-
use. Corrugated polyethylene pipe is fine. Brent wants to reroute it. Joe pointed
out, the only potential negative is the longer distance and elevation of the upstream
and downstream tile. But the rerouting would avoid any future problems under the
course. J.T. stated he went through that area and the field tile had also blown on the
east side of Route 47. Kramer says there are tile laws. If the tiles cross your
property, you could be liable for anything that happens upstream. He advised Brent
to check with his attorney. Joe stated that Brent's obligation is to make sure the tile
on his property is good. Brent said he would ask Bob Lee's permission to repair
tiles on Lee's property. Joe said the City would not object to that. Brent confirmed
that he needed to replace it with rigid PVC pipe and that was all. Joe agreed. Brent
asked about the 4". Joe said he wasn't sure where the 4" ends. It may not go
beyond this property. There needs to be an exploratory trench dug on the south side
of the drive to see if it continues. If it is extended than replace it, if it isn't then
abandon it. Jim stated it would be Brent's risk. Brent agreed. Joe reiterated if it is
there then replace it. Brent felt it was his risk to repair it or leave it. Joe agreed but
stated that since we're aware of it we must maintain it. If it isn't found than there is
no problem.
Next issue was the ADA restrooms. Brent has one large unisex bathroom that
would be updated to handicap accessible. He wants to know the minimum required.
Bill called Springfield but didn't have enough information supplied to him to get an
answer from them. Bill needs a set of plans, the use of the property and an estimate
on occupancy. The State of Illinois decides if there are to be one or two
bathrooms. Bill must contact them if there is going to be a variation. Dealing with
the Illinois Accessibility Code from the Illinois State Accessibility Code handed
down from the ADA. The ADA is a grievance law. Bill will get a copy of the rules
from the Illinois Accessibility Code to Brent and Brent will get a copy of the plans,
and a letter stating usage and estimate of occupancy.
Next, the existing septic system that is approx. six years old. Brent feels that the
septic is capable of handling the additional usage. Does he need to hook up to the
sanitary sewer? He has a letter from McCann to Don Peck stating confirmation of
Brent granting the City a roadway easement in exchange for a permit for the use of a
well and septic system for as long as the special use is on his parcel. Also a letter
stating confirmation of the Grant of Permanent Sewer and Interceptor Easement in
exchange for a free water and sewer tap-on. Water up to 1" and sewer up to 6". Joe
stated according to the City's Ordinance if within 200', you must hook up. Joe needs
-2-
to know an estimate of the average and peak usage of people/day; a typical load is
10 gallon per person per day. Joe asked if Brent was positive of the true location of
the septic field? Yes. It would be a simple connection to make. But it would trigger
recapture and tap-on fees. Joe couldn't find the easement agreement stating the
terms of the hook up. Brent has letters. City connection fee would be waived, but
YBSD's hook up fees would still apply, as well as recapture. Brent's worried that
tearing up three sides of his business could be a hardship on it. He would like to
leave the septic side alone. He would also like an answer, yes or no. City Council
is the only body to decide. Brent was advised, if he would like to, he should
petition the City Council to waive the requirement Discussion was held as to
interpretation and opinion of the letter. Joe suggestion a middle of the road
approach that Brent would connect if the system fails or within a certain time,
whichever occurs first. Tony suggested that since this is a legal issue, to get Dan's
opinion first, then go the City Council.
Joe stated they need to see a landscape plan. Brent said he wanted to get some other
issues settled first before working on a landscape plan. Joe explained that when
they see a site plan they like to see a landscape plan also. They need a general
indication of plants- conceptual. Miniature golf course plan shown w/a garden style
course. Low bushes and waterfall on the course. Joe would like to see a plan
including more street frontage, detention pond and parking lot indication. Curb
appeal and screening. Need landscape plan for property other than golf course.
Need to clarify some elevations on the field tile. Lighting was discussed. Bill
would like a set of plans for zoning. Vendor can supply you with photometric
contour plan. A plan showing the lighting intensity. Joe had two sets of plans and
gave one print back. Bill goes by code not by variance. Just the nuts and bolts of it.
Jim reiterated the need to get with Dan on the one issue. No permit has been issued
or applied for yet. Building permit will be an additional fee, not what was already
paid. Brent needs to fill out an application. Then it will take hours not days to
review. Brent needs to leave copies of the letters from attorneys, easement
agreement and plans.
Gary Schlapp Annexation Agreement.
This is planned to go to Planning Commission on October 14,1998 as a
recommendation to Kendall County. County A-1 zoning allows for a dog kennel
but doesn't allow for any retail or boarding for a caretaker on site. Memo is
-3-
enclosed. This use is not on our Comprehensive Plan for this area. Seeking a
special use on the A-1 site for attendant and kennels. The church just east of this
parcel is A-1 special use. There won't be any outdoor kennels per Alan. Total
inside operation. The building will be sound proof and have a 48" brick facade on
the front. Planning to hook up to City water and sewer and disposal system will be
YBSD. No outside storage. May fence an area behind the building for a leash walk
only - dogs will not be left in this area. Mike Schoppe stated type of plan for this
area is low density residential. He thinks this use could fit in but there are a few
concerns. The architecture and the landscaping of the building are two of these
concerns. Frank Vitek stated it is a pole building. Mike agreed that that would be a
concern. Concerned with the look of this and the property for the future.
Landscaping was discussed quite a bit. Special concern was given regarding area
along street and melding it with Conover site. Pre-annexation agreement needs to
include text plan for landscaping. This site will not include any vet clinic. Frank
Vitek stressed that there is a blind curve coming from the south and the entry to this
kennel is extremely dangerous. Joe stated this issue is a planning commission
issue. Shared access is good to reduce the number of accidents. Tony asked about
traffic expectations. The size of the building is 9100 sq. ft. hours would be from
8-8 M - F 8-4 on Sat. No vet. clinic. Occupancy of up to 30 cats and 55 dogs.
Some retail of pet type items (food, etc.) is proposed. Tony asked if kennels were
governed under any state agency? Dept. of Agriculture. 1 yr inspection required.
A-1 states that it can be not less than 500' from any residential lot line. Tony stated
that in the pre-annexation agreement the language needs to reflect the setbacks
determined. It is estimated at 100 - 125' from the property line to the building site
right now.
Both side properties currently have pre-annexation agreements. Joe feels it would
make sense to tie into City water and sewer. With respect to the driveway, several
right angles are shown. Mike Hitzemann didn't feel this would be a problem. But
did feel that the hydrant needed to be constructed to the north end of the driveway
by backside of the property with a pressure tap. Normal code is every 300-500 ft.
Tony asked about the current driveway being used for business. Apron must be
updated.
Storm water drainage. Pond volume is too small for parameters given. It could be
enlarged easily. The biggest issue with the stormwater is the outfall. It's relatively
flat and there is no ditch along Cannonball Trail to speak of. What they are
-4-
proposing is to construct a drywell in the bottom of the pond that the water from the
pond would sink into the ground. Joe has concerns with this. The inside of the
perforated pipes will eventually get coated with slime and muck and it will become
a high maintenance issue. You could see water standing out there for a lot longer
than you want it to. The County's consultant had the same concern. The only idea
Joe had was from a Blackberry Creek subdivision that used rear yard utility
easements which might open up the possibility to construct a storm sewer down to
the creek. Only other possibility is to connect somehow to the field tile about 1000'
north. What is shown now is not practical. Alan stated their concerns of cost to
discharge to the creek and whether there would be any recapture respective to a 5
acre parcel when there are hundreds of acres around that could eventually be
developed. Alan suggested putting in a storm water sewer to tie into. Joe stated
that was a possibility depending on elevations, how large the recapture areas
should/would be and whether a larger pipe would be needed to serve that area. But
it is a possibility. Tony asked about the churches use. Frank Vitek doesn't think
there is anything. Joe stated all other issues are relatively minor. Sidewalk along
Cannonball Trail. Tony stated that they would include in the annexation agreement
to participate in a trail system when it is constructed. Mike asked about the future
of Cannonball Trail. The plan is to keep it rural. The only change may be on the
commercial end near Route 34 and Route 47. Tony said it is used currently as a
bypass to Route 47, but we don't want it to be too attractive for the semis to start
using. Alan stated he does have a copy of a draft of a pre-annexation agreement.
What zoning would it come in as? Mike will check. Plan Commissions input
needed. Frank Vitek, representing the Cannonball Residents, stated that is spot
zoning. It's not compatible. He went on to state that several meetings have been
held on this issue and adjacent property owners have yet to be notified of any
meetings. He felt this was just poor business and poor public relations. Should
have checked zoning of property before buying a piece of land and wasting our time
and money when this is not compatible to this area. It is a pole building. It is a
business. This is disrespect to the people in the area. Not one person in the
Cannonball area wants this. Tony asked who these comments are addressed to.
Just general comments. Frank would like to see the procedure that a developer
needs to go through. First the private people in the area should be notified to see
how they feel. The church is extremely opposed to this plan. Jim stated that no one
said we were going to change our plan, but we have an obligation to respond to a
property owner. J.T. stated that this is a technical review committee. Plan
Commission will notify the adjacent property owners and City Council is the only
-5-
one who decides zoning. J.T. suggested going to Gary Schlapp and telling him how
they feel. Frank continued about how the property owners feel towards this
proposal. Tony gave clarification of our flow chart. Jim gave our circle of concept
review. There is no vote at this review,just issues discussed and to be brought
before the Plan Commission. This procedure is mostly for subdivision. Alan
clarified this issue is not for zoning, this property is not contiguous. It was brought
up due to the 1 1/2 mile radius. Alan stated what has transpired up until now.
Asking the County for a special use for A-1 zoning. Tony, Jim and Frank discussed
the possibility of changing the flow for development to start with public opinion.
Frank restated that none of the residents will agree to this.
Frank was informed of the Plan Commission meeting to be held on October 14th in
the Kendall County Board Room.
Alan Norton - Cannonball Hill
Jim stated that Alan Norton's project had been through the red line on the flow
chart. Site is just east of Blackberry Creek North. They are proposing to subdivide
this into 26 single family lots with a minimum size of 12,000 sq. ft. South portion
by creek and woods to be given to an organization will conserve it as a nature
haven. Also want to comply with all City Ordinances. From the corner of Lot 18 to
the north there will be additional storm water detention that would also act as a
wetland. This would be sufficient to serve the developed area. Would bring sewer
and water in from BBCN up the side line. Loop watermain to Cannonball Trail -
long dead end. Vertical configuration of the lots will include walk outs on as many
as possible. This plan is different; line was moved 1Oft further west. Same number
of lots - all over 12,000 sq. ft. No soil checks done yet. The existing 16"
watermain needs to be continued through the subdivision. Then brought back out to
the corner. Joe felt that we had to look at the big picture of moving large amounts
of water over long distances. This will have to be looked at closer. Joe spoke with
Andy Myers, he said this section of Cannonball will remain a County Road and he
wasn't sure as to how much of ROW will be requested or if there would be
additional dedication. Andy talked about extending the road and having a small
hammerhead put in. Fran stated that there wasn't a need for this and would draft a
letter regarding that. Alan Norton and Jim felt that there had been a verbal
consensus as to no need for the extension and hammerhead. Need to get that in
writing. Alan stated that a hammerhead creates a hardship to everyone involved.
10 foot ROW shown. Cannonball Trail is a min. of 80'. Joe would like to review
-6-
this more closely. Alan will take this to Plan Commission next week. Mike asked
if they addressed issues that came up at last Plan Commission. Extension of road,
fate of land (nature), initial landscaping along Cannonball Trail. Advised them to
have a response ready for issues that were brought up previously. Alan is not
agreeable to a hammerhead without access. Need to receive the letter from Fran
before Plan Commission. Alan is proposing a Homeowner's Association to care for
the pond. Tony questioned dedication of land to a group. Nature groups are trying
to obtain corridors along creeks to retain wildlife or if no one wants it, he could give
it to the parks. Discussion was held regarding this corridor. Alan is trying to look
down the road to the future to conserve this piece of nature. Tony stated the
language regarding this property needs to be conveyed to the buyers of the lots,
either on deed or homeowners association document. Mike agrees that the
homeowners should be notified that this is public land. Alan wants everyone to see
the value of this corridor. J.T. brought up the issue of misquitos in a wetland area.
Plantings and trees will camouflage the detention area. Joe is recommending they
have a wetland delineation done. Joe questioned if any part of the detention basin is
located in the flood plain. John stated it is not. Field tiles going across there? John
& Alan are sure. Discussion was held regarding the creek, sewer crossing it and
dedication of easements along it.
Need to get the letter from Fran and Joe will review these plans and get back to
Alan by tomorrow. Bill D. wants to check the size of the lots and setbacks for
zoning purposes and get back to Joe by Monday. Park Land dedication was
discussed. A trail from their subdivision over to Blackberry Creek North
(Pedestrian Easement) Alan would volunteer a sidewalk to get over to the edge of
the property instead of having sidewalks going along sides and rears of peoples
yards. Mike asked about the traffic on Cannonball Trail. Joe stated it is not a
problem at this point.
Fox Hill Unit 6 - Sycamore Road Extension
Joe started by stating we have the plat and that Paul & Mike were invited. Memo
is enclosed. There are quite a few little things. They don't show any easements
along side lot lines. Mike Caphas indicated that the utility easements have been
exclusive in Fox Hill in the past. Joe would like to see general utility easements.
Jim stated that these are Municipal Easements. J.T. stated that the easements
should be non-exclusive. This is not going to Plan Commission. This is the plan
-7-
that is defining the ROW and the park to be done prior to starting Unit 5 and Route
34 improvements. These comments have already gone to Mike Cap. J.T. stated
that they have a J.U.L.I.E. scheduled for Monday. There is no highway permit for
the route 34 improvements yet. Joe asked for resubmittal of plat.
Meeting adjourned at 11:35 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by Holly Baker
xpcniin
6P�g9 19 OUP?
q �, CITY of YORKVILLE
0R. County Seat of Kendall County
K 111 W. Fox,Suite 3
Yorkville,IL 60560
630-553-4350
' E
�OVNOED N ��
September 24, 1998
Mr. Mark Olesen
Peter F. Olesen and Associates,Inc.
500 W. Central Road, Suite 205
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Re: Parfection Park
Dear Mark,
I have reviewed you plan submittal for Parfection Park,received on 9/23/98, and have.the
following comments:
• Sheet 3:
a) The existing clay field tile is relatively shallow, and will probably be damaged by
construction of the golf course. Replace that section under the golf course with
PVC sewer pipe, SDR 26 of the same size.
b) Show proposed slopes from Structure No.2 to the pond.
• Sheet 4:
a) Please show additional spot elevations to demonstrate that all water from the
parking lot will flow to Structure No.2.
b) The pond outfall sewer is still shown as 18"diameter. Change to 12"diameter.
c) I could not find the note on Sheet 2 that you referred to regarding televising of the
existing sanitary sewer.
d) Our Building Inspector has stated that ADA compliant public restrooms are
required. Do the current facilities comply?
e) Ordinance No. 92-6 states that any building or property within 250 feet of a
public sanitary sewer is required to connect to that sewer. There is also a
significant amount of uncertainty concerning the impact of construction upon the
existing septic field and the ability of the existing septic system to handle the
increased usage generated by the miniature golf course. Therefore,the existing
building and any new restrooms should be connected to the public sanitary sewer.
• Sheet 5 —The landscape plan should also include plantings along the parking lot and
the detention basin. All plantings should be at least generally identified by location,
basic species, number of plants,etc.
• Need elevation and slope data for detention basin outfall.
• Sheet 7 -The parking lot pavement detail still calls for 8"agg. base course. This
should be changed to 10"agg, base course.
r'
• Detention basin—Calculations looks OK. Volume of basin from grading plan looks
OK. HWL=657.50. Invert elevation of 4" restrictor is 655.67.
Please revise and re-submit two sets of plans for review. If you have questions about any
of these items, please call me at (630) 553-4372.
Very truly\yours,
W
Joseph W of
City Engineer
Cc: Jim Nanninga, City Administrator
Bill Dettmer, Building Inspector
Brent Schalhamer
4
All
MEMO
To: Jim Nanninga, City Administrator
From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer
Subject: Gary Schlapp Petition—Cann ball rail
Date: October 7, 1998
I have reviewed the proposed site plan for this development, and have the following comments:
• Our Comprehensive Plan calls for low-density residential land use in this area. If the kennel is
allowed,there should be assurances that noise and odor won't affect adjacent properties.
There should be a landscape plan to provide a buffer with adjacent properties.
• Both of the adjacent properties and part of this property have pre-annexation agreements with
the city. In light of those previous agreements and the request to connect to city water and
sanitary sewer,there should be a pre-annexation agreement for the balance of this property.
• Cannonball Trail is a secondary arterial roadway,therefore a ROW dedication of 40 to 50 feet
from the centerline should be required.
• The shared access to Cannonball Trail with the church property is a good idea. There should
be a mutual ingress/egress easement across the church property and the Schlapp property.
• Are the 90* bends in the driveway acceptable to the Fire Protection District?
• Our ordinance requires the driveway/parking lot to have 3"of asphalt on 10"of stone.
• My detention calculations indicate that 2.8 acre-feet of storage are needed for the ultimate
build-out condition. Only 2.3 acre-feet are provided.
• The stormwater outfall is proposed to be a dry well. This area has sandy soils,but the
perforated pipe that is supposed to drain the pond into the sand could clog frequently. There
should also be an emergency overflow for the pond.
• There should be a detention easement granted over the detention basin area. We may also
want to request additional easements along lot lines for future use.
• The sanitary service sewer should be 6"PVC, SDR 26. This is a private line, so the only
testing we should require is vacuum testing of the existing and proposed manholes to make
sure they are watertight.
• There should be a detail for the sanitary service connection to the existing manhole. This
should call for a cored opening with a rubber boot. There may need to be modifications to the
manhole bench.
• The B-Box location isn't shown. It should be within the existing permanent utility easement.
• Do we want to have sidewalk along this property's Cannonball Trail frontage?
• What is the proposed signage for this property? Is there any proposed lighting?
This development is scheduled for Planning Council agenda on October 8, 1998. If you have
questions about any of these items, please call me.
Cc: Joe Hammer,Morris Engineering
t
t'
Schl4pp Property—Cannonball Trail
Currently Proposed
Buildings 9110 SF
Pavement 18,731 SF
Pond 34,412 SF
Grass 155,547 SF
Total 217,800 SF= 5.00 acres
Future build-out
Additional buildings 40,576 SF
Additional pavement 40,577 SF
Total buildings 49,686 SF= 1.141 acres
Total pavement 59,308 SF= 1.361 acres
Total pond 34,412 SF= 0.790 acres
Total grass 74,394 SF = 1.708 acres
217,800 SF= 5.000 acres
r'
100 Year Detention Pond Volume
Subdivision Name: Schlapp Parcel- Cannonball Trail Date: 6-Oct-98
Storage Required
Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Volume
fuml flam (CFS) (CFS) acre-ft
0.083 10.92 56.221 56.221 0.386
0.170 10.02 51.588 51.588 0.725
0.250 8.20 42.217 42.217 0.872
0.500 5.60 28.831 28.831 1.191
1.000 3.56 18.329 18.329 1.515
2.000 2.24 11.533 11.533 1.906
3.000 1.62 8.341 8.341 2.068
6.000 0.95 4.891 4.891 2.425
12.000 0.55 2.832 2.832 2.808
_Composite "C"factor determination
Type of Area Acres "C' Factor CxA
Grass 1.708 0.500 0.854
Pavement 1.361 0.980 1.334
Wet/Green Detention 0.79 1.000 0.790
Rooftop 1.141 1.000 1 141
TOTALS 5 4.11878
"C" = 0.824
Cm =1.25 x C= 1.030
Allowable Run-off= 0 cfs/acre (no outfall)
Allowable Run-off= 0.00 cfs
Required detention volume = 2.808 acre-feet
.. fig°%S OU.9
y aG
'� CITY of YORKVILLE
ae 9�
p County Seat of Kendall County
K 111 W.Fox,Suite 3
Yorkville,IL 60560
0 630-553-4350
�ouNoe
September 30, 1998
Mr.Mike Cap
Michael J. Cap,Ltd.
2147 Ridge Road
Homewood,Illinois 60430
Re: Fox Hill Unit 6(Sycamore Road)—Final Plat&Engineer's Estimate
Dear Mike:
I have reviewed the plat for the Unit 6, received on September 28'x, and have the following
comments:
• Please dedicate triangular areas as ROW at the NW and NE corners of the
John/Sycamore intersection. The sides of each triangle should be 25 feet long.
• Add text for Lot 3 stating that it is dedicated to the city for park purposes.
• Show utility and drainage easements along all lot lines for Lots 1,2, and 3. Easernerrts to
be 10 feet wide along all lot lines except at the following locations:
a) South and west sides of Lot 2—20 feet
b) North and west sides of Lot 3—15 feet
• Show building setback lines for all lots.
• The metes and bounds description has an error—the last course should be 690.64 feet.
• Add a School District Certificate, City Administrator Certificate, and IDOT Certificate.
Revise the City Engineer Certificate.(See attached examples)
• Add easement provisions. (See attached example)
Regarding the Engineer's Estimate, public sidewalk and landscaping at least adjacent to the
park should be included in the estimate,since there is no builder there to install them. Seeding
and landscaping of the park itself, as shown in the landscape plan, should also be included in
the estimate.
Please revise and send two prints back to me for review. These items will be discussed at
Planning Council on October 8, 1998,9:30 am at the Yorkville city office. It would be helpful
if you and/or Paul Dresden could attend.
•Page 1
Y4' t
t'
If you have questions about any of these items,please call me at(630)5534372.
Very truly yours,
Joseph Wywrot
City Engineer
Cc:-Tim Nanninga,City Administrator
Paul Dresden,Yorkville Development,Inc.
•Page 2
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF .1
MCCURDY ARE RECORD
CAUSED THE SAME TO BE TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH. RANGE 7 EAS
2 USES AND PURPOSES �/
IT THE SAME UNDER THE CITY OF I �OR-K.VILLE. KENDAL COU
M
ANDS SHOWN ON THIS
.VICES; AND HEREBY ALSO SCHOOL DISTRICT CERTIFICATE
THE INSTALLATION OF
'ED IN THE UTILITY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, MICHAEL MCCURDY AND
ROSEMARY MCCURDY AS OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IN THE`
SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE, WHICH WILL BE KNOWN AS GEORGE WASHINGTON SUB. , IS
Z EASEMENTS" ON THIS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT #
VILLE AND TO ANY AND/OR HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ## IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS .
,ING, 8UT NOT LIMITED
S GAS COMPANY, DATED THIS DATE OF 19
,EIR SUCCESSORS AND
.ITY TO CONSTRUCT,
,RIOUS TRANSMISSION,
AND ALL NECESSARY OWNER: OWNER:
REMOVE ANY TREES, MICHAEL MCCURDY ROSEMARY MCCURDY
WITH THE OPERATION OF
OR TREES SHALL BE
,R GARDENS, SHRUBS,
,TER INTERFERE WITH THE
ATIONS WITHIN THE NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE
OF YORKVILLE AS TO
THE ORDINANCES OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS)
) SS
COUNTY OF KENDALL)
19�_, A.D. .
I , , A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE COUNTY
AND STATE AFORESAID, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT MICHAEL MCCURDY AND ROSEMARY
MCCURDY ARE PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE SAME PERSON WFii'j6E ?JAMES ARE
PSEIWARY MCCURDY SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATE, APPEARED BEFORE ME, THIS DAY, IN
PERSON AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE EXECUTION OF THIS STATEMENT AS HIS/HER FREE ANU
VOLUNTARY ACT.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF
19
R THE STATE AND COUNTY NO'T'ARY PUBLIC
ROSEMARY MCCURDY IS
LLINOIS
CITY ENGINEER CERTIFICATE
STATE OF ILLINOIS)
) SS
COUNTY OF KENDALL)
I, CITY ENGINEER OF THE UNITED CITY OF
YORKVILLE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN
INSTALLED, OR THE REQUIRED GUARANTEE COLLATERAL HAS BEEN POSTED FOR THE
COMPLETION OF ALL REQUIRED LAND IMPROVEMENTS .
DATED AT YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF
19 , A.D. .
CITY ENGINEER
I
CITY ADMINISTRATOR' S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF ILLINOIS)
) SS
COUNTY OF KE:'DALL)
APPROVED BY THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE; KENDALL
COUNTY, ILLINOIS THIS DAY OF 19
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
PLAN COMMISSION CERTIFICATE
STATE OF ILLINOIS)
fils►SEt PROVISION GgANI,ED TO ILLINOIS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON t
N—EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT ISTHERNBILLINOISEGAS COMPANY, HOLDERS OF EXISTING
A NO
BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, NOR THEIR RESPECTIVE
COMPANY, JONES IN'PERCABLE, OTHER FPYORKVILLE, 'LLINOISLA, T „DRAINAGE AND
ED BY THE CITY THE FRANCHISES GRANT REPAIR, REMOVE,
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WITH CTE INSTALL,ORECONSTRUCTTSMISSION AND
TO CON
UTILITY EASEMENT" MAINTAIN AND/ OpEp UNDERGROUND
INSPECT, "DRAINAGE GAS
REPLACE, ON SYSTEMS AND LINES UNDER THE SURFACE OF THE
DISTRIBUTI INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATIONANND TALLENECESSAgYLFACILITIES THE
UTILIT'! EASEMENT INC PURPOSES,
ELECTRIC LINES, CABLE TELEVISION LINES,
MAINS► ETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF Ag CCESS SUCH U5ESTAND R RP
APPURTENANT THERETO, TOG REQUIRED FOR
RSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY AND
PE
T SS INSTALL REQUIRED SERVCE CONNECTIONS UNDER
AND TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT
THE
SURFACE OF EACH LOT TO SERVE IMPROVEMENTS THEREON.ND GRANTED TO THE
RECONSTRUCT, REPAIR,
TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL,TRANSMISSION AND
A
NON—EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT IS ALSO HEREBY RESERVED F
CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS SANITARY SEWERS, WITHING THE AREAS
REMOVE REPLACE AND INSPECT FACILITIES ERS, AND R THE TETHER WITH A RIGHT
DISTRIBUTION OF WATER, STORM UTILITY EASEMENT' , REQUIRED
E PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY AND
SHOWN ON THE HERETO FOR 11TH IPERS AND
OF ACCESS PURPOSES .
FOR SUCH USES AND
NTITIES ARE HEREBY GRANTED THE RIGHT TO ENTETHEPRIGHT TO
THE ABOVE NAMED E gIBED FOR THE USES HEREIN SET FORTH THE AREAS
EASEMENTS HEREIN DESC TREES, SHRUBS OR OTHER
CUT, TRIM, OR REMOVE ANY UTILITY EASEMENT" WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE
REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT,
DESIGNATED AS "DRAINAGE AND TRANSMISSION AND
ONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, RECONSTRUCTION,
UNDERGROUNDAIR� I NO PERMANENT
C OPERATION 0 THERETO.
MAINTENANCE, AND FACILITIES APPURTENANT
� CONSTRUCTED IN, UPON, OR
DISTRIBU'T'ION SYSTEMS � UTILITY EASEMENT" , BUT -SUCH
BUILDINGS,
STRUCTURES, ED AS ANDLL E ING, DRIVEWAYS, AND
OVER ANY AREAS DESIGNATED A SCAP
AREAS MAY BE USED FOR GARDENS, NOT UBUNREASONABLY INTERFERE WITH THE USES.
OTHER RELATED PURPOSES THAT
HEREIN DESCRIBED. HEREIN GRANTED AND
THE OCCUPATION AND
USE OF THE NON—EXCLUSIVE HApFMSUCH ENTITIES SHALL BE
RESERVED FOR THE ABOVE NAMED ENTITIES T FE OR WHICH SUCH EASEMENTS ARE E
A MANNER SO AS NOT TO INTEREF ITH OR PRECLUDE THE S BY E
DONE IN SUCH USE THEREOF BY OTHER ENTITIES
OCCUPATION AND RECROSSING OF
SO AIDNOTSTOEI RFERE
GRANT AND RESERVED. THE L BEODONEGIN S A MANN SYSTEMS AND
ABOVE NAMED ENTITIES SHA •TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION
SVITII, DAMAGE, OR DISTURB ANY �, STING WITHIN THE EASEMENTS BEING CROSSED ABOVE NAMED
FACILITIES AP THERETO XI
0 USE OR OCCUPATION OF SAID IMPAIR OR CHANGE THE SURFACE
OR RECROSSED. N CHANGE IN GRADE OR
ENTITIES SHAt7SE ANY
DRAINAGE PATTERNS .
E PER BY THE CITY OF YORVxAVE NO OBLIGATION
SE
FOLLOWING ANY WORK TO B D SAID CITY SHALL
OF ITS EASEMENT RIGHTS
EHEREIN RESTORATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED- TO,TREESHELAN
WITH RESPECT TO
CURB►
GUTTERS,
HOWEVER, THAT SAID CITY MOUND ALLOTR NCH CREATED SO
RESTORATION, REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT,
OR SHRUBBERY, PROVIDED,
FOLLOWING SUCH MAINTENANCE WORK TO BACKFPAL AND PH LEAVE THE
AS TO RETAIN SU
ITABLE DRAINAGE, TO COLD PATCHli��SP�LT LEAVE CONCRETE
SURFACE, TO REMOVE AA GENERALLY ECLEAN AND ANDS WORKMANLIKE CONDITION.
..,,_ MAINTENANCE AREA IN
i
l
CITY OF YORKVILLE
PLANNING COUNCIL
OCTOBER 8, 1998
SIGN IN SHEET
PROJECT
NAME (PLEASE PRINT!) REPRESENTING PHONE #
('c yl rJ Ul Sc►� ta�p /�nne�a��a4 S53 - 77a
b4 1�.1 �7� 1r27_esl�l C� —3300
i -
l " c o
ss-�-yya
W/,� O ®f") env✓�-
LIX
ZI Ze—7 Z1Z
✓ 44 111a �5& VTT--� r�j,,) Az�2�- .��{ •97 5