Loading...
Plan Council Minutes 1998 10-08-98 UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE Committee Minutes - Plan Council October 8, 1998 Meeting Location: City Conference Time Convened: 9:38 a.m. Time Adjourned: 11:39 a.m. Attendees: Jim Nanninga City Administrator Bill Dettmer Building Inspector Joe Wywrot City Engineer Mike Hitzemann B.K.F.D. Tim Fairfield B.K.F.P.D./E.M.S Tony Graff Chief of Police Mike Schoppe Schoppe Design Frank Vitek Cannonball Citizen - Schlapp Rezoning James Rohrbach Cannonball Citizen - Schlapp Rezoning Alan Garrow Schlapp Rezoning Brent Schalhamer Parfection Park Alan Norton Cannonball Hill Developer John Schumacher Siebert Engineers - Cannonball Hill Parfection Park Brent Schalhamer wants to add an 18 hole miniature golf course to his current facility. Plans are drawn and are at the final site plan stage. There are some issues to discuss, see memo attached. The existing clay tile field has three blowholes and some tiles have collapsed. He would like to reroute the 6" line around the course with corrugated piping. He doesn't feel anything needs to be done with the 4" line. He feels that it collapsed because of the heavy equipment that came in to put in the sanitary sewer. He would like some leeway to get this repaired. Joe felt there was no way of knowing why the tiles collapsed, but the clay tiles do cut across the NE corner of the proposed course. For Brent's own protection, if he wants to leave it where it is or go around the course then he would want to replace it with a more durable pipe that won't collapse. Brent wanted clarification on the type of pipe to -1- use. Corrugated polyethylene pipe is fine. Brent wants to reroute it. Joe pointed out, the only potential negative is the longer distance and elevation of the upstream and downstream tile. But the rerouting would avoid any future problems under the course. J.T. stated he went through that area and the field tile had also blown on the east side of Route 47. Kramer says there are tile laws. If the tiles cross your property, you could be liable for anything that happens upstream. He advised Brent to check with his attorney. Joe stated that Brent's obligation is to make sure the tile on his property is good. Brent said he would ask Bob Lee's permission to repair tiles on Lee's property. Joe said the City would not object to that. Brent confirmed that he needed to replace it with rigid PVC pipe and that was all. Joe agreed. Brent asked about the 4". Joe said he wasn't sure where the 4" ends. It may not go beyond this property. There needs to be an exploratory trench dug on the south side of the drive to see if it continues. If it is extended than replace it, if it isn't then abandon it. Jim stated it would be Brent's risk. Brent agreed. Joe reiterated if it is there then replace it. Brent felt it was his risk to repair it or leave it. Joe agreed but stated that since we're aware of it we must maintain it. If it isn't found than there is no problem. Next issue was the ADA restrooms. Brent has one large unisex bathroom that would be updated to handicap accessible. He wants to know the minimum required. Bill called Springfield but didn't have enough information supplied to him to get an answer from them. Bill needs a set of plans, the use of the property and an estimate on occupancy. The State of Illinois decides if there are to be one or two bathrooms. Bill must contact them if there is going to be a variation. Dealing with the Illinois Accessibility Code from the Illinois State Accessibility Code handed down from the ADA. The ADA is a grievance law. Bill will get a copy of the rules from the Illinois Accessibility Code to Brent and Brent will get a copy of the plans, and a letter stating usage and estimate of occupancy. Next, the existing septic system that is approx. six years old. Brent feels that the septic is capable of handling the additional usage. Does he need to hook up to the sanitary sewer? He has a letter from McCann to Don Peck stating confirmation of Brent granting the City a roadway easement in exchange for a permit for the use of a well and septic system for as long as the special use is on his parcel. Also a letter stating confirmation of the Grant of Permanent Sewer and Interceptor Easement in exchange for a free water and sewer tap-on. Water up to 1" and sewer up to 6". Joe stated according to the City's Ordinance if within 200', you must hook up. Joe needs -2- to know an estimate of the average and peak usage of people/day; a typical load is 10 gallon per person per day. Joe asked if Brent was positive of the true location of the septic field? Yes. It would be a simple connection to make. But it would trigger recapture and tap-on fees. Joe couldn't find the easement agreement stating the terms of the hook up. Brent has letters. City connection fee would be waived, but YBSD's hook up fees would still apply, as well as recapture. Brent's worried that tearing up three sides of his business could be a hardship on it. He would like to leave the septic side alone. He would also like an answer, yes or no. City Council is the only body to decide. Brent was advised, if he would like to, he should petition the City Council to waive the requirement Discussion was held as to interpretation and opinion of the letter. Joe suggestion a middle of the road approach that Brent would connect if the system fails or within a certain time, whichever occurs first. Tony suggested that since this is a legal issue, to get Dan's opinion first, then go the City Council. Joe stated they need to see a landscape plan. Brent said he wanted to get some other issues settled first before working on a landscape plan. Joe explained that when they see a site plan they like to see a landscape plan also. They need a general indication of plants- conceptual. Miniature golf course plan shown w/a garden style course. Low bushes and waterfall on the course. Joe would like to see a plan including more street frontage, detention pond and parking lot indication. Curb appeal and screening. Need landscape plan for property other than golf course. Need to clarify some elevations on the field tile. Lighting was discussed. Bill would like a set of plans for zoning. Vendor can supply you with photometric contour plan. A plan showing the lighting intensity. Joe had two sets of plans and gave one print back. Bill goes by code not by variance. Just the nuts and bolts of it. Jim reiterated the need to get with Dan on the one issue. No permit has been issued or applied for yet. Building permit will be an additional fee, not what was already paid. Brent needs to fill out an application. Then it will take hours not days to review. Brent needs to leave copies of the letters from attorneys, easement agreement and plans. Gary Schlapp Annexation Agreement. This is planned to go to Planning Commission on October 14,1998 as a recommendation to Kendall County. County A-1 zoning allows for a dog kennel but doesn't allow for any retail or boarding for a caretaker on site. Memo is -3- enclosed. This use is not on our Comprehensive Plan for this area. Seeking a special use on the A-1 site for attendant and kennels. The church just east of this parcel is A-1 special use. There won't be any outdoor kennels per Alan. Total inside operation. The building will be sound proof and have a 48" brick facade on the front. Planning to hook up to City water and sewer and disposal system will be YBSD. No outside storage. May fence an area behind the building for a leash walk only - dogs will not be left in this area. Mike Schoppe stated type of plan for this area is low density residential. He thinks this use could fit in but there are a few concerns. The architecture and the landscaping of the building are two of these concerns. Frank Vitek stated it is a pole building. Mike agreed that that would be a concern. Concerned with the look of this and the property for the future. Landscaping was discussed quite a bit. Special concern was given regarding area along street and melding it with Conover site. Pre-annexation agreement needs to include text plan for landscaping. This site will not include any vet clinic. Frank Vitek stressed that there is a blind curve coming from the south and the entry to this kennel is extremely dangerous. Joe stated this issue is a planning commission issue. Shared access is good to reduce the number of accidents. Tony asked about traffic expectations. The size of the building is 9100 sq. ft. hours would be from 8-8 M - F 8-4 on Sat. No vet. clinic. Occupancy of up to 30 cats and 55 dogs. Some retail of pet type items (food, etc.) is proposed. Tony asked if kennels were governed under any state agency? Dept. of Agriculture. 1 yr inspection required. A-1 states that it can be not less than 500' from any residential lot line. Tony stated that in the pre-annexation agreement the language needs to reflect the setbacks determined. It is estimated at 100 - 125' from the property line to the building site right now. Both side properties currently have pre-annexation agreements. Joe feels it would make sense to tie into City water and sewer. With respect to the driveway, several right angles are shown. Mike Hitzemann didn't feel this would be a problem. But did feel that the hydrant needed to be constructed to the north end of the driveway by backside of the property with a pressure tap. Normal code is every 300-500 ft. Tony asked about the current driveway being used for business. Apron must be updated. Storm water drainage. Pond volume is too small for parameters given. It could be enlarged easily. The biggest issue with the stormwater is the outfall. It's relatively flat and there is no ditch along Cannonball Trail to speak of. What they are -4- proposing is to construct a drywell in the bottom of the pond that the water from the pond would sink into the ground. Joe has concerns with this. The inside of the perforated pipes will eventually get coated with slime and muck and it will become a high maintenance issue. You could see water standing out there for a lot longer than you want it to. The County's consultant had the same concern. The only idea Joe had was from a Blackberry Creek subdivision that used rear yard utility easements which might open up the possibility to construct a storm sewer down to the creek. Only other possibility is to connect somehow to the field tile about 1000' north. What is shown now is not practical. Alan stated their concerns of cost to discharge to the creek and whether there would be any recapture respective to a 5 acre parcel when there are hundreds of acres around that could eventually be developed. Alan suggested putting in a storm water sewer to tie into. Joe stated that was a possibility depending on elevations, how large the recapture areas should/would be and whether a larger pipe would be needed to serve that area. But it is a possibility. Tony asked about the churches use. Frank Vitek doesn't think there is anything. Joe stated all other issues are relatively minor. Sidewalk along Cannonball Trail. Tony stated that they would include in the annexation agreement to participate in a trail system when it is constructed. Mike asked about the future of Cannonball Trail. The plan is to keep it rural. The only change may be on the commercial end near Route 34 and Route 47. Tony said it is used currently as a bypass to Route 47, but we don't want it to be too attractive for the semis to start using. Alan stated he does have a copy of a draft of a pre-annexation agreement. What zoning would it come in as? Mike will check. Plan Commissions input needed. Frank Vitek, representing the Cannonball Residents, stated that is spot zoning. It's not compatible. He went on to state that several meetings have been held on this issue and adjacent property owners have yet to be notified of any meetings. He felt this was just poor business and poor public relations. Should have checked zoning of property before buying a piece of land and wasting our time and money when this is not compatible to this area. It is a pole building. It is a business. This is disrespect to the people in the area. Not one person in the Cannonball area wants this. Tony asked who these comments are addressed to. Just general comments. Frank would like to see the procedure that a developer needs to go through. First the private people in the area should be notified to see how they feel. The church is extremely opposed to this plan. Jim stated that no one said we were going to change our plan, but we have an obligation to respond to a property owner. J.T. stated that this is a technical review committee. Plan Commission will notify the adjacent property owners and City Council is the only -5- one who decides zoning. J.T. suggested going to Gary Schlapp and telling him how they feel. Frank continued about how the property owners feel towards this proposal. Tony gave clarification of our flow chart. Jim gave our circle of concept review. There is no vote at this review,just issues discussed and to be brought before the Plan Commission. This procedure is mostly for subdivision. Alan clarified this issue is not for zoning, this property is not contiguous. It was brought up due to the 1 1/2 mile radius. Alan stated what has transpired up until now. Asking the County for a special use for A-1 zoning. Tony, Jim and Frank discussed the possibility of changing the flow for development to start with public opinion. Frank restated that none of the residents will agree to this. Frank was informed of the Plan Commission meeting to be held on October 14th in the Kendall County Board Room. Alan Norton - Cannonball Hill Jim stated that Alan Norton's project had been through the red line on the flow chart. Site is just east of Blackberry Creek North. They are proposing to subdivide this into 26 single family lots with a minimum size of 12,000 sq. ft. South portion by creek and woods to be given to an organization will conserve it as a nature haven. Also want to comply with all City Ordinances. From the corner of Lot 18 to the north there will be additional storm water detention that would also act as a wetland. This would be sufficient to serve the developed area. Would bring sewer and water in from BBCN up the side line. Loop watermain to Cannonball Trail - long dead end. Vertical configuration of the lots will include walk outs on as many as possible. This plan is different; line was moved 1Oft further west. Same number of lots - all over 12,000 sq. ft. No soil checks done yet. The existing 16" watermain needs to be continued through the subdivision. Then brought back out to the corner. Joe felt that we had to look at the big picture of moving large amounts of water over long distances. This will have to be looked at closer. Joe spoke with Andy Myers, he said this section of Cannonball will remain a County Road and he wasn't sure as to how much of ROW will be requested or if there would be additional dedication. Andy talked about extending the road and having a small hammerhead put in. Fran stated that there wasn't a need for this and would draft a letter regarding that. Alan Norton and Jim felt that there had been a verbal consensus as to no need for the extension and hammerhead. Need to get that in writing. Alan stated that a hammerhead creates a hardship to everyone involved. 10 foot ROW shown. Cannonball Trail is a min. of 80'. Joe would like to review -6- this more closely. Alan will take this to Plan Commission next week. Mike asked if they addressed issues that came up at last Plan Commission. Extension of road, fate of land (nature), initial landscaping along Cannonball Trail. Advised them to have a response ready for issues that were brought up previously. Alan is not agreeable to a hammerhead without access. Need to receive the letter from Fran before Plan Commission. Alan is proposing a Homeowner's Association to care for the pond. Tony questioned dedication of land to a group. Nature groups are trying to obtain corridors along creeks to retain wildlife or if no one wants it, he could give it to the parks. Discussion was held regarding this corridor. Alan is trying to look down the road to the future to conserve this piece of nature. Tony stated the language regarding this property needs to be conveyed to the buyers of the lots, either on deed or homeowners association document. Mike agrees that the homeowners should be notified that this is public land. Alan wants everyone to see the value of this corridor. J.T. brought up the issue of misquitos in a wetland area. Plantings and trees will camouflage the detention area. Joe is recommending they have a wetland delineation done. Joe questioned if any part of the detention basin is located in the flood plain. John stated it is not. Field tiles going across there? John & Alan are sure. Discussion was held regarding the creek, sewer crossing it and dedication of easements along it. Need to get the letter from Fran and Joe will review these plans and get back to Alan by tomorrow. Bill D. wants to check the size of the lots and setbacks for zoning purposes and get back to Joe by Monday. Park Land dedication was discussed. A trail from their subdivision over to Blackberry Creek North (Pedestrian Easement) Alan would volunteer a sidewalk to get over to the edge of the property instead of having sidewalks going along sides and rears of peoples yards. Mike asked about the traffic on Cannonball Trail. Joe stated it is not a problem at this point. Fox Hill Unit 6 - Sycamore Road Extension Joe started by stating we have the plat and that Paul & Mike were invited. Memo is enclosed. There are quite a few little things. They don't show any easements along side lot lines. Mike Caphas indicated that the utility easements have been exclusive in Fox Hill in the past. Joe would like to see general utility easements. Jim stated that these are Municipal Easements. J.T. stated that the easements should be non-exclusive. This is not going to Plan Commission. This is the plan -7- that is defining the ROW and the park to be done prior to starting Unit 5 and Route 34 improvements. These comments have already gone to Mike Cap. J.T. stated that they have a J.U.L.I.E. scheduled for Monday. There is no highway permit for the route 34 improvements yet. Joe asked for resubmittal of plat. Meeting adjourned at 11:35 a.m. Respectfully submitted by Holly Baker xpcniin 6P�g9 19 OUP? q �, CITY of YORKVILLE 0R. County Seat of Kendall County K 111 W. Fox,Suite 3 Yorkville,IL 60560 630-553-4350 ' E �OVNOED N �� September 24, 1998 Mr. Mark Olesen Peter F. Olesen and Associates,Inc. 500 W. Central Road, Suite 205 Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Re: Parfection Park Dear Mark, I have reviewed you plan submittal for Parfection Park,received on 9/23/98, and have.the following comments: • Sheet 3: a) The existing clay field tile is relatively shallow, and will probably be damaged by construction of the golf course. Replace that section under the golf course with PVC sewer pipe, SDR 26 of the same size. b) Show proposed slopes from Structure No.2 to the pond. • Sheet 4: a) Please show additional spot elevations to demonstrate that all water from the parking lot will flow to Structure No.2. b) The pond outfall sewer is still shown as 18"diameter. Change to 12"diameter. c) I could not find the note on Sheet 2 that you referred to regarding televising of the existing sanitary sewer. d) Our Building Inspector has stated that ADA compliant public restrooms are required. Do the current facilities comply? e) Ordinance No. 92-6 states that any building or property within 250 feet of a public sanitary sewer is required to connect to that sewer. There is also a significant amount of uncertainty concerning the impact of construction upon the existing septic field and the ability of the existing septic system to handle the increased usage generated by the miniature golf course. Therefore,the existing building and any new restrooms should be connected to the public sanitary sewer. • Sheet 5 —The landscape plan should also include plantings along the parking lot and the detention basin. All plantings should be at least generally identified by location, basic species, number of plants,etc. • Need elevation and slope data for detention basin outfall. • Sheet 7 -The parking lot pavement detail still calls for 8"agg. base course. This should be changed to 10"agg, base course. r' • Detention basin—Calculations looks OK. Volume of basin from grading plan looks OK. HWL=657.50. Invert elevation of 4" restrictor is 655.67. Please revise and re-submit two sets of plans for review. If you have questions about any of these items, please call me at (630) 553-4372. Very truly\yours, W Joseph W of City Engineer Cc: Jim Nanninga, City Administrator Bill Dettmer, Building Inspector Brent Schalhamer 4 All MEMO To: Jim Nanninga, City Administrator From: Joe Wywrot, City Engineer Subject: Gary Schlapp Petition—Cann ball rail Date: October 7, 1998 I have reviewed the proposed site plan for this development, and have the following comments: • Our Comprehensive Plan calls for low-density residential land use in this area. If the kennel is allowed,there should be assurances that noise and odor won't affect adjacent properties. There should be a landscape plan to provide a buffer with adjacent properties. • Both of the adjacent properties and part of this property have pre-annexation agreements with the city. In light of those previous agreements and the request to connect to city water and sanitary sewer,there should be a pre-annexation agreement for the balance of this property. • Cannonball Trail is a secondary arterial roadway,therefore a ROW dedication of 40 to 50 feet from the centerline should be required. • The shared access to Cannonball Trail with the church property is a good idea. There should be a mutual ingress/egress easement across the church property and the Schlapp property. • Are the 90* bends in the driveway acceptable to the Fire Protection District? • Our ordinance requires the driveway/parking lot to have 3"of asphalt on 10"of stone. • My detention calculations indicate that 2.8 acre-feet of storage are needed for the ultimate build-out condition. Only 2.3 acre-feet are provided. • The stormwater outfall is proposed to be a dry well. This area has sandy soils,but the perforated pipe that is supposed to drain the pond into the sand could clog frequently. There should also be an emergency overflow for the pond. • There should be a detention easement granted over the detention basin area. We may also want to request additional easements along lot lines for future use. • The sanitary service sewer should be 6"PVC, SDR 26. This is a private line, so the only testing we should require is vacuum testing of the existing and proposed manholes to make sure they are watertight. • There should be a detail for the sanitary service connection to the existing manhole. This should call for a cored opening with a rubber boot. There may need to be modifications to the manhole bench. • The B-Box location isn't shown. It should be within the existing permanent utility easement. • Do we want to have sidewalk along this property's Cannonball Trail frontage? • What is the proposed signage for this property? Is there any proposed lighting? This development is scheduled for Planning Council agenda on October 8, 1998. If you have questions about any of these items, please call me. Cc: Joe Hammer,Morris Engineering t t' Schl4pp Property—Cannonball Trail Currently Proposed Buildings 9110 SF Pavement 18,731 SF Pond 34,412 SF Grass 155,547 SF Total 217,800 SF= 5.00 acres Future build-out Additional buildings 40,576 SF Additional pavement 40,577 SF Total buildings 49,686 SF= 1.141 acres Total pavement 59,308 SF= 1.361 acres Total pond 34,412 SF= 0.790 acres Total grass 74,394 SF = 1.708 acres 217,800 SF= 5.000 acres r' 100 Year Detention Pond Volume Subdivision Name: Schlapp Parcel- Cannonball Trail Date: 6-Oct-98 Storage Required Duration Intensity Runoff Rate Volume fuml flam (CFS) (CFS) acre-ft 0.083 10.92 56.221 56.221 0.386 0.170 10.02 51.588 51.588 0.725 0.250 8.20 42.217 42.217 0.872 0.500 5.60 28.831 28.831 1.191 1.000 3.56 18.329 18.329 1.515 2.000 2.24 11.533 11.533 1.906 3.000 1.62 8.341 8.341 2.068 6.000 0.95 4.891 4.891 2.425 12.000 0.55 2.832 2.832 2.808 _Composite "C"factor determination Type of Area Acres "C' Factor CxA Grass 1.708 0.500 0.854 Pavement 1.361 0.980 1.334 Wet/Green Detention 0.79 1.000 0.790 Rooftop 1.141 1.000 1 141 TOTALS 5 4.11878 "C" = 0.824 Cm =1.25 x C= 1.030 Allowable Run-off= 0 cfs/acre (no outfall) Allowable Run-off= 0.00 cfs Required detention volume = 2.808 acre-feet .. fig°%S OU.9 y aG '� CITY of YORKVILLE ae 9� p County Seat of Kendall County K 111 W.Fox,Suite 3 Yorkville,IL 60560 0 630-553-4350 �ouNoe September 30, 1998 Mr.Mike Cap Michael J. Cap,Ltd. 2147 Ridge Road Homewood,Illinois 60430 Re: Fox Hill Unit 6(Sycamore Road)—Final Plat&Engineer's Estimate Dear Mike: I have reviewed the plat for the Unit 6, received on September 28'x, and have the following comments: • Please dedicate triangular areas as ROW at the NW and NE corners of the John/Sycamore intersection. The sides of each triangle should be 25 feet long. • Add text for Lot 3 stating that it is dedicated to the city for park purposes. • Show utility and drainage easements along all lot lines for Lots 1,2, and 3. Easernerrts to be 10 feet wide along all lot lines except at the following locations: a) South and west sides of Lot 2—20 feet b) North and west sides of Lot 3—15 feet • Show building setback lines for all lots. • The metes and bounds description has an error—the last course should be 690.64 feet. • Add a School District Certificate, City Administrator Certificate, and IDOT Certificate. Revise the City Engineer Certificate.(See attached examples) • Add easement provisions. (See attached example) Regarding the Engineer's Estimate, public sidewalk and landscaping at least adjacent to the park should be included in the estimate,since there is no builder there to install them. Seeding and landscaping of the park itself, as shown in the landscape plan, should also be included in the estimate. Please revise and send two prints back to me for review. These items will be discussed at Planning Council on October 8, 1998,9:30 am at the Yorkville city office. It would be helpful if you and/or Paul Dresden could attend. •Page 1 Y4' t t' If you have questions about any of these items,please call me at(630)5534372. Very truly yours, Joseph Wywrot City Engineer Cc:-Tim Nanninga,City Administrator Paul Dresden,Yorkville Development,Inc. •Page 2 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF .1 MCCURDY ARE RECORD CAUSED THE SAME TO BE TOWNSHIP 37 NORTH. RANGE 7 EAS 2 USES AND PURPOSES �/ IT THE SAME UNDER THE CITY OF I �OR-K.VILLE. KENDAL COU M ANDS SHOWN ON THIS .VICES; AND HEREBY ALSO SCHOOL DISTRICT CERTIFICATE THE INSTALLATION OF 'ED IN THE UTILITY THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, MICHAEL MCCURDY AND ROSEMARY MCCURDY AS OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IN THE` SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE, WHICH WILL BE KNOWN AS GEORGE WASHINGTON SUB. , IS Z EASEMENTS" ON THIS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT # VILLE AND TO ANY AND/OR HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ## IN KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS . ,ING, 8UT NOT LIMITED S GAS COMPANY, DATED THIS DATE OF 19 ,EIR SUCCESSORS AND .ITY TO CONSTRUCT, ,RIOUS TRANSMISSION, AND ALL NECESSARY OWNER: OWNER: REMOVE ANY TREES, MICHAEL MCCURDY ROSEMARY MCCURDY WITH THE OPERATION OF OR TREES SHALL BE ,R GARDENS, SHRUBS, ,TER INTERFERE WITH THE ATIONS WITHIN THE NOTARY PUBLIC CERTIFICATE OF YORKVILLE AS TO THE ORDINANCES OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS) ) SS COUNTY OF KENDALL) 19�_, A.D. . I , , A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE COUNTY AND STATE AFORESAID, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT MICHAEL MCCURDY AND ROSEMARY MCCURDY ARE PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE SAME PERSON WFii'j6E ?JAMES ARE PSEIWARY MCCURDY SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATE, APPEARED BEFORE ME, THIS DAY, IN PERSON AND ACKNOWLEDGED THE EXECUTION OF THIS STATEMENT AS HIS/HER FREE ANU VOLUNTARY ACT. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL THIS DAY OF 19 R THE STATE AND COUNTY NO'T'ARY PUBLIC ROSEMARY MCCURDY IS LLINOIS CITY ENGINEER CERTIFICATE STATE OF ILLINOIS) ) SS COUNTY OF KENDALL) I, CITY ENGINEER OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED, OR THE REQUIRED GUARANTEE COLLATERAL HAS BEEN POSTED FOR THE COMPLETION OF ALL REQUIRED LAND IMPROVEMENTS . DATED AT YORKVILLE, KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF 19 , A.D. . CITY ENGINEER I CITY ADMINISTRATOR' S CERTIFICATE STATE OF ILLINOIS) ) SS COUNTY OF KE:'DALL) APPROVED BY THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE; KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS THIS DAY OF 19 CITY ADMINISTRATOR PLAN COMMISSION CERTIFICATE STATE OF ILLINOIS) fils►SEt PROVISION GgANI,ED TO ILLINOIS COMMONWEALTH EDISON t N—EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT ISTHERNBILLINOISEGAS COMPANY, HOLDERS OF EXISTING A NO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, NOR THEIR RESPECTIVE COMPANY, JONES IN'PERCABLE, OTHER FPYORKVILLE, 'LLINOISLA, T „DRAINAGE AND ED BY THE CITY THE FRANCHISES GRANT REPAIR, REMOVE, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WITH CTE INSTALL,ORECONSTRUCTTSMISSION AND TO CON UTILITY EASEMENT" MAINTAIN AND/ OpEp UNDERGROUND INSPECT, "DRAINAGE GAS REPLACE, ON SYSTEMS AND LINES UNDER THE SURFACE OF THE DISTRIBUTI INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATIONANND TALLENECESSAgYLFACILITIES THE UTILIT'! EASEMENT INC PURPOSES, ELECTRIC LINES, CABLE TELEVISION LINES, MAINS► ETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF Ag CCESS SUCH U5ESTAND R RP APPURTENANT THERETO, TOG REQUIRED FOR RSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY AND PE T SS INSTALL REQUIRED SERVCE CONNECTIONS UNDER AND TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT THE SURFACE OF EACH LOT TO SERVE IMPROVEMENTS THEREON.ND GRANTED TO THE RECONSTRUCT, REPAIR, TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL,TRANSMISSION AND A NON—EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT IS ALSO HEREBY RESERVED F CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS SANITARY SEWERS, WITHING THE AREAS REMOVE REPLACE AND INSPECT FACILITIES ERS, AND R THE TETHER WITH A RIGHT DISTRIBUTION OF WATER, STORM UTILITY EASEMENT' , REQUIRED E PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY AND SHOWN ON THE HERETO FOR 11TH IPERS AND OF ACCESS PURPOSES . FOR SUCH USES AND NTITIES ARE HEREBY GRANTED THE RIGHT TO ENTETHEPRIGHT TO THE ABOVE NAMED E gIBED FOR THE USES HEREIN SET FORTH THE AREAS EASEMENTS HEREIN DESC TREES, SHRUBS OR OTHER CUT, TRIM, OR REMOVE ANY UTILITY EASEMENT" WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE REMOVAL, REPLACEMENT, DESIGNATED AS "DRAINAGE AND TRANSMISSION AND ONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, RECONSTRUCTION, UNDERGROUNDAIR� I NO PERMANENT C OPERATION 0 THERETO. MAINTENANCE, AND FACILITIES APPURTENANT � CONSTRUCTED IN, UPON, OR DISTRIBU'T'ION SYSTEMS � UTILITY EASEMENT" , BUT -SUCH BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, ED AS ANDLL E ING, DRIVEWAYS, AND OVER ANY AREAS DESIGNATED A SCAP AREAS MAY BE USED FOR GARDENS, NOT UBUNREASONABLY INTERFERE WITH THE USES. OTHER RELATED PURPOSES THAT HEREIN DESCRIBED. HEREIN GRANTED AND THE OCCUPATION AND USE OF THE NON—EXCLUSIVE HApFMSUCH ENTITIES SHALL BE RESERVED FOR THE ABOVE NAMED ENTITIES T FE OR WHICH SUCH EASEMENTS ARE E A MANNER SO AS NOT TO INTEREF ITH OR PRECLUDE THE S BY E DONE IN SUCH USE THEREOF BY OTHER ENTITIES OCCUPATION AND RECROSSING OF SO AIDNOTSTOEI RFERE GRANT AND RESERVED. THE L BEODONEGIN S A MANN SYSTEMS AND ABOVE NAMED ENTITIES SHA •TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION SVITII, DAMAGE, OR DISTURB ANY �, STING WITHIN THE EASEMENTS BEING CROSSED ABOVE NAMED FACILITIES AP THERETO XI 0 USE OR OCCUPATION OF SAID IMPAIR OR CHANGE THE SURFACE OR RECROSSED. N CHANGE IN GRADE OR ENTITIES SHAt7SE ANY DRAINAGE PATTERNS . E PER BY THE CITY OF YORVxAVE NO OBLIGATION SE FOLLOWING ANY WORK TO B D SAID CITY SHALL OF ITS EASEMENT RIGHTS EHEREIN RESTORATION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED- TO,TREESHELAN WITH RESPECT TO CURB► GUTTERS, HOWEVER, THAT SAID CITY MOUND ALLOTR NCH CREATED SO RESTORATION, REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, OR SHRUBBERY, PROVIDED, FOLLOWING SUCH MAINTENANCE WORK TO BACKFPAL AND PH LEAVE THE AS TO RETAIN SU ITABLE DRAINAGE, TO COLD PATCHli��SP�LT LEAVE CONCRETE SURFACE, TO REMOVE AA GENERALLY ECLEAN AND ANDS WORKMANLIKE CONDITION. ..,,_ MAINTENANCE AREA IN i l CITY OF YORKVILLE PLANNING COUNCIL OCTOBER 8, 1998 SIGN IN SHEET PROJECT NAME (PLEASE PRINT!) REPRESENTING PHONE # ('c yl rJ Ul Sc►� ta�p /�nne�a��a4 S53 - 77a b4 1�.1 �7� 1r27_esl�l C� —3300 i - l " c o ss-�-yya W/,� O ®f") env✓�- LIX ZI Ze—7 Z1Z ✓ 44 111a �5& VTT--� r�j,,) Az�2�- .��{ •97 5