Loading...
Park Board Packet 2006 10-12-06 t YORKVILLE PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT Administration Office—Riverfront Building 301 E.Hydraulic St Yorkville,H, 60560 630-5534341 Park Board Agenda Thursday, October 12, 2006 7:00 p.m. — Park Board Meeting Riverfront Building Call to Order: Roll Call: Chris Rollins, Ken Koch, Van Truman, Gary Golinski, Debbie Horaz, , Seth Schoonover, Kelly Sedgewick, Alderman Paul James Introduction of Guests, City Officials and Staff: Director of Parks and Recreation —David Mogle Superintendent of Recreation —Sue Swithin Superintendent of Parks—Scott Sleezer Park Planner— Laura Haake Public Comment: Presentations: Approval of Minutes: Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting — September 28, 2006" Special Meeting —August 21, 2006 Bills Review: Cash Analysis* Bill List* Old Business: Hometown Days Report Westbury Development Board Retreat Truck Purchase* New Business: Grande Reserve Park A Design Services* Grande Reserve Park B Design Services* Reports: Parks Report Recreation Report J Additional Business: Executive Session: For the appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance or dismissal of specific employees of the public body or legal counsel for the public body. (51LCS 120(1)) Adjournment: Next meeting: October 26, 2006 *Items needing Board approval or recommendation UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE YORKVILLE PARKS &RECREATION DEPARTMENT BOARD MEETING Parks & Recreation Administrative Office Riverfront Building Monday,August 21,2006 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: Meeting was called to order by Chris Rollins at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: Gary Golinski,Debbie Horaz,Kelly Sedgwick,Van Truman,Ken Koch GUEST/CITY OFFICIALS/STAFF: David Mogle,Executive Director Sue Swithin,Superintendent of Recreation Patrick Hughes—Senior Vice President of Ocean Atlantic,Chicago Region Travis Miller OLD BUSINESS: Westbury Village/Ocean Atlantic Follow Up Dave Mogle explained that this meeting is a follow up to the July 27`s park board meeting at which representatives from Westbury/Ocean Atlantic agreed to return to a park board meeting to give them an update on revisions to their plan that were based upon park board suggestions. This is being done as a Special Meeting because the plan was scheduled to go back to City Council on August 22 and the park board does not meet again until the 24t`. Mr.Mogle provided a handout that had been distributed by Westbury reps to the City Council and a draft of the PUD Agreement. Patrick Hughes,Vice President of Ocean Atlantic,who runs the Chicago Office made a presentation explaining that the plan entails the area of expansion beyond the South and East Villages which have already been approved. Mr.Hughes said he had reviewed staffs written comments and understands the park board's concerns. However,he stated that Westbury was a different type of residential development from most others and from their perspective should be looked at differently. He explained that 66 total acres in land or cash are required to be given through the Land Cash Ordinance. Of this amount,27 acres for public parks was being proposed,with another two to three acres in trail, making a total public land area of 29 to 30 acres devoted to parks.Mr.Hughes further stated that the rest of the open land was not developable land because it had been a quarry and a landfill. He went on to explain how a golf course would be the only useful feature for this area. The golf course and related clubhouse buildings would be the central recreational amenities for the development. Mr.Hughes further stated that the golf course and clubhouse style is what people want in today's market space. This is a most desirable direction because its what people want,and it commands a higher price which is better for the developer and better for the City because of the increased tax base when it hits the tax rolls. Mr.Hughes further explained that in order to be financially feasible the planned open space could not be just for parks. The golf course is approximately 240 acres including lakes and another 15 to 17 acres will be land for seven clubhouses. Mr.Hughes said eventually 9900 people will reside in the community. He stated that because so much of the land is not good for building,they had to pursue a higher density on the land that was suitable for building in order to generate enough revenue to pay for the land that can't be built on and for the private amenities. His view was that the City was benefiting greatly by all the recreational amenities that would be built because the burden would not be on the City to provide them. His view was that though it was not typical for the City to give credit for private recreation areas,it should be considered in this can because by providing at their own expense several park areas for the residents,plus the golf course,in addition to the 30 acres of public park land,they were reducing the burden for the City to have to provide alternative sources of recreation because it is being done in a private manner. Mr.Hughes said they would be willing to create some initiatives in exchange for credit for a portion of the golf course. He said that for at least the first five years,the course could remain a public fee course with Yorkville residents receiving a discount. The course would be made available to High School students indefinitely for golf team practice and meets. The City or Parks and Recreation Department could host 2 or 3 events per year. The golf course management would also establish a golf academy for kids to learn and practice their golf skills. Mr.Hughes concluded his presentation by saying that the golf course and clubhouses would be Westbury's parks for its residents,which though developed privately,would be available for various lengths of times to the community. The lakes would have to remain private. They would like to see the Com Ed easement used as additional recreational land and would work with Com Ed at coming to an agreement. In return for all of this they are wanting a small percentage of credit for the private recreation areas. Chris Rollins pointed out that he did not see much change being made by Ocean Atlantic in what they were offering and felt giving credit for private recreational amenities was going down a"slippery slope." Chris questioned whether the Com Ed land use was possible and was not willing to give credit for land owned by others. Dave Mogle clarified that Ocean Atlantic was no longer seeking credit for the easement. Chris also sought clarification on the public potential for the lakes. Mr.Hughes stated you can't have boating or fishing going on the lake right next to the golf course. Concerning the other lake,though it was considered, Mr.Hughes's partners in the end were not willing to make that area public. Mr.Hughes reiterated his position that the private amenities were reducing significantly the impact upon the City's parks by providing much of the recreation for the development. Chris acknowledged an understanding of this position,but responded that Parks and Rec recognizes how little soccer can be played at a clubhouse or baseball on a golf course. Chris said we understand that there must be a balance and even in communities where there are wonderful clubhouses,private pools,and facilities there is great pressure on the City parks. A community of 10,000 residents will create tremendous pressure on the parks. Chris further stated that is why there is a concern about what will be the opportunities for public use versus private amenities such as a golf course and clubhouses,which residents may find useful but will not be the "core"of their recreational experience. They will want areas for active recreational opportunities beyond the golf course,clubhouses or a very small pool. Offering no credit on the golf course is troubling according to Mr.Hughes. Chris and Ken Koch brought up their concern that making the golf course public for just a short time and then going to a private, member only operation was unfair to those who helped support the course when it was first built and resources were limited. Chris asked rhetorically why would the City want to fund any amount for a course that would only be public for a few years and then private,members only,for decades. He stated that would not be a wise expenditure of public funds. Mr.Hughes re-emphasized he was just asking for a portion of credit for the golf course and that the 240 acres of open space,though he wished it could be dedicated to parks could not be because of the nature of this development. They would have to look at giving the City as much land as they feel they can and the rest in cash. If that is the case he doesn't know how the project could sustain itself and the public uses of the golf course that he had earlier described are no longer viable because he believes he could no longer volunteer those uses. He suggested that not everyone wants to play baseball or soccer and the golf course provides another recreational amenity. Generally the park board agreed with this,but it was brought out that this need is already being met in the community. Mr.Hughes stated that this golf course was of a championship caliber,unique from others in the community,and he was offering some public use for partial credit to alleviate the burden of having to take on all the land in the development. He believes since not everyone will want to play baseball,or soccer,etc.,but would rather come to the clubhouse or play golf this will relieve some of the burden on City parks and believes he should get a percentage of credit for that. Dave Mogle brought out that the percentage being asked for credit for the golf course amounted to 24 acres of land and at$80,000 per acre amounts to close to$2,000,000 which is a high price for the limited uses being offered. Ken believes part of the issue is that the golf course offers a specific recreational activity. Non golf recreational activities would not be allowed to occur there. Those types of recreational opportunities are needed too,which is why we need generous park space Mr.Hughes said that if the park board could give a little he could give a little. He felt he was doing this for our residents. Chris responded rather it was for his customers and that he understood Mr.Hughes argument but it was not a compelling one. If we do not have adequate land for public parks in the development we will then need to have funds to purchase land to meet this need. Giving up funds for a private,commercial venture when we have to be concerned for the recreational needs of the development's residents,not for five years but for a lifetime,make us unwilling to give the developer a break in this area. Ken Koch reminded everyone we did not give credit for any of the other developments' clubhouses, that this could become an issue for these other developers.Mr.Hughes stated that all annexation agreements are negotiated individually and this should not be an issue. He reemphasized that by having Westbury residents recreating in the development's private facilitates would have to reduce the impact on City Dave believed that regardless of the amenities that the developer is building within the development,with a development that size there would be a great impact on the public recreational facilities outside the development,that the argument of the developer-built facilities reducing the impact on other City parks and programs was exaggerated. Chris added that though there may be some impact,it would be minor because not everyone would use the golf course or the swimming pools,both of which are seasonal. Chris added that there are a great many other public recreational activities that will be wanted for the parks in the development and that the park board needs to focus on what the recreational demands of the development will be once it is built out and that the City Parks and Recreation has a fiduciary responsibility to make certain we are meeting the broad recreational needs of the entire population and though we are glad that the golf course and some of the other private amenities are going in,we cannot grant credit for these private amenities. Rather,land cash that is received must go toward public park and recreational purposes to meet the growing pressures that are certain to be there as the development builds out. Mr.Hughes asked if there were any other questions and stated his appreciation that the park board came out tonight to the meeting. He said that he sees it differently than the park board.He stated his disappointment that there was not any common ground on the issue of credit for the private amenities and that it was disappointing that the park board would not move much on this issue. Gary Golinski responded that the developer was not offering much and contrasted the situation to the Grande Reserve development in which no credit was given for the aquatic facilities and the City received 100%of land and cash and asked what are we getting for the residents of Yorkville. Mr.Hughes responded that it should not be a question of what Yorkville residents are getting,believing in the total scope of the project Yorkville residents were gaining much. He said he appreciated Chris's comments which he thought were thoughtful and fair but could do without the other comments. He ended by saying we have agreed to disagree. He thanked the park board for their time. At this point,Mr.Hughes left the park board meeting. There was some follow up discussion that centered around many of the points that were brought up in the presentation. Chris was surprised that the open water recreation had been dropped for consideration. Dave said it was dropped by Westbury last week and was mentioned in a meeting with the mayor. Ken said some of the points of our counter proposal were not even addressed,like larger parks in the high density area. Gary expressed concern that we keep watch on this issue and keep the lines of communication open with the City Council. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS O'Keefe Property, Water Park The committee unanimously agreed that a water park for Yorkville was a great idea,and that the city should not let this plan get away. Sue Swithin did raise some concerns about cost to the citizens as far as making it affordable for people to go. It was suggested and agreed upon that it should be put in a contract between the city and sponsors to give a discounts on passes to Yorkville residents and to provide some kind of sponsorship program for residents of lower income brackets to receive passes. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:30 pm when Gary Golinski motioned to adjourn the meeting,the motion was seconded by Van Truman. The motion was unanimously approved. Minute Taker—Brittney Kot UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE YORKVILLE PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT BOARD MEETING Parks & Recreation Administrative Office Riverfront Building Thursday, September 28,2006 MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: Meeting was called to order by Ken Koch at 7:03 p.m. ROLL CALL: Ken Koch, Van Truman, Gary Golinski, Debbie Horaz, and Seth Schoonover GUESTS/CITY OFFICIALS/STAFF: Dave Mogle,Director of Parks and Recreation Sue Swithin, Superintendent of Recreation Scott Sleezer, Superintendent of Parks Laura Haake,Park Planner Carrie Hansen, Wiseman Hughes Vince Rosanova, DBCWCTD Mike Schoppe, SDA Loren Underhill, Yorkville Reds Baseball Steven Hanson, Yorkville Reds Baseball Kim Hanson, Yorkville Reds Baseball Jennie May, Yorkville Reds Baseball Kevin May, Yorkville Reds Baseball PUBLIC COMMENT: Steven Hanson attended the meeting tonight because youth baseball field usage was on the agenda. He and others wanted to be present to hear information and answer any questions. Westbury Development will present an updated plan. After the scheduled presentation,the agenda will be moved related to these guests. PRESENTATIONS• Town homes of Windett Ridge The Board Members were given the preliminary plan of the Townes at Windett Reserves. The 3 acre parcel for a park is adjacent to and east of Route 47. The 85 acre Townes at Windett Reserves will soon be requesting annexation. Vince Rosanova requested the Board to discuss the land dedication or cash in lieu of contribution. Mike Schoppe presented more details. In October 2005 the concept review was similar to the one now presented. Townes at Windett Reserves consists of all town homes. The one park in this development would be a 3 acre parcel that would be next to the school site. The combined park and school site would be 21 acres. The Plan Commission meeting is October l la'. Wiseman-Hughes would like the Parks and Recreation Board's input on the preliminary plans and how it relates to the recreational improvements. The main east/west road that borders the park and school site will connect to Penman Road(north/south)which will be part of the Hudson's Lake project. The large open space corridor starts at Windett Ridge (head waters of Aux Sable Creek) and continues around some open space. In the master plan the trail is extended and divides the park/ school site,through the drainage corridor, and then to Aux Sable Creek. Townes at Windett Reserves consists of 180 attached units and 10 detached units. Based on current city calculations tables for park purposes only, 4.87 acres dedication will be required. The population increase with this subdivision will grow to approximately 487 people. This will be a low density area of 2.16. Vince Rosanova believed that the Board earlier had the intentions of 3 acres in land and the remaining 1.87 cash in lieu of land at $80,000 per acre which would be approximately$150,000. The developer wants to work with the Board in solidifying the location of the park. Originally, Carrie Hansen at a previous meeting with staff proposed a 3 acre L-shaped park parcel, but was clear that the Wiseman-Hughes plans were open to what Parks and Recreation would like. The L-shaped parcel was not ideal. At a meeting also with Dr. Engler, Mike Schoppe encouraged looking at the whole open site, including an adjacent 7 acre park site in Windett Ridge already dedicated to the City, in order to maximize the layouts of the school and park sites. Dr. Engler was open to moving the trail adjacent to the school site in a different way other than the original plan. Wiseman—Hughes is willing to be flexible on the park placement. The Board's input is encouraged for the trail connection extending through the park/school open space. The Board should decide if the trail should be extended and if so the size of the trail, easement specifications, and the credit given for part of that. There has not been a conversation about trail in lieu of sidewalk along the east/west road north of the park site. Parks and Recreation asked Heartland Crossing for a trail to Penman And Aux Sable Creek. Land cash credit will be given and/or land swapped to compensate for the north/south road that bisects the original Windett Ridge park site. Scott Sleezer wanted to note to the Board the drainage issues. A drainage swale, currently showing in the plan, should not interfere with park space. There is a need for water to drain through the open space somewhere with inlets. Within reason the water path can be moved slightly to fit the school and park plans. Carrie Hansen stated that the 21 acres (15 acres for school and park's 4.87 acres) can be a combination of land and cash. She knows the Board would like up to a 3 acre park. Scott Sleezer, Dave Mogle, Laura Haake, and Mike Schoppe can meet to further discuss placement of the park. Scott Sleezer will research regarding the trail along the water. If the trail is near the drainage swale of open space it would be about 1000 ft. long or 1400 feet if the trail is along the east/west road. The Board is in favor of the given area of the school and park site. The Parks and Recreation Staff, Dr. Engler, and Mike Schoppe will meet to discuss the trail linkage. The placement of the specific school and park sites within the designated area should be determined before the annexation agreement. OLD BUSINESS: Westbury Development Greg Stevens presented information regarding some property Ocean Atlantic has purchased or would like to—53 acres north of Galena Road. It is L-shaped and east of the north/south ComEd easement. A sliver of ComEd easement borders the north section of the piece. Beecher Road travels north/south from Westbury, crosses Galena, and the alignment will go north through the development pods. A conceptual plan was shown for a 29 acre park site within this area. Four baseball fields and parking were shown as placeholders,in addition to other playing fields. The narrow top piece of the 29 acres ranges in width from 265 —300 feet. Greg Stevens would like preliminary thoughts on the plan. Westbury wants credit for the 29 acres at$80,000 per acre. The cost is about $2.2 million. This would be in addition to the original stated park space. Pat Hughes,representing Westbury, and Dave Mogle met. Staff then was debriefed and concerns surfaced. The top narrow rectangle piece of property is 1000-1500 feet long and at most 300 feet wide. A regulation soccer field is 320 feet,plus buffer zones which include 75 feet on each side. With the current dimensions of the narrow strip,the soccer fields pictured would have to be east/west and need to be north/south with the sun issues. Unless ComEd could allow the usage of the easement, soccer fields would be impractical. This area is difficult to access. It is adjacent to senior citizen housing that is age- restricted. Trails by this development would most likely be denied. The Board would not be interested in the narrow strip of land. There is an 8.8 acre future park in White Pines to the northwest and two 5 acre that are adjacent to each other northeast of Westbury. With this acreage, Staff questions if the proposed 16 acre baseball complex area would be needed so close to the other parks and worth the lost cash. National park standards need to be met. Westbury is such a high density area including 3,000 units south of Galena Road. The presented area would encourage kids to cross Galena Road, a natural barrier. This would be unsafe. The developments south of Galena still need open space and that issue has not been addressed. In an area south of the 16 acre proposed park, 30-35 homes will be built. This is about 131 people within 1.5 acres. The expansion of the 3 villages of middle, north, and west would be 67 acres in land cash. The original proposed park space included 27-29 acres and met only half the obligation. Again,the Board will not give credit for the golf course and the lake. Yorkville has lots of park space north of Westbury. The south side of Galena is in need of parks. Greg Stevens will ask Ocean Atlantic if the 16 acre park space could be swapped with the Single Family A area. According to Greg Stevens,the original park sites proposed for the Westbury expansion will remain. In lieu of increasing the acreage of those parks like the Board requested,this additional land is proposed. The staff's concern is that too much land is not desired, if not enough cash comes with it for park development . Dave Mogle and Scott Sleezer will look at numbers and call Greg Stevens to meet again. Youth Baseball Field Usage The Parks and Recreation Board met on Monday, September 25th for a special meeting. The Board's direction is to have facilities for everyone with the highest priority to YYBS because of its agreement with the City. The Reds organization is also valued. Jason Pettit, Director of Kendall County Forest Preserve District, and Dave Mogle spoke on the phone and the Reds could use the Harris Forest Preserve Field, since it appears that the YYBS are abandoning use of it. The Forest Preserve District, is open to working with the Park Board concerning this. The Regional Ball Diamonds will be reserved for the adult Yorkville Parks and Recreation programs starting at 8 p.m. Monday through Friday. Perhaps in the future there may be some weekend tournaments too. Van Truman verified that YYBS has a few tournaments on Saturday, but Sundays are open on the Grande Reserve Diamonds. That could be an option for the Reds. Steve Hanson from the Reds questioned why YYBS would not use Harris and the Reds organization keep Hoover which is sentimental to them after a year of play and work on the field. Sue Swithin answered that the intergovernmental agreement with YYBS and the Forest Preserve with Hoover allows Parks and Recreation to put park funding into Hoover. This is not true for Harris. Scott Sleezer looked at both Harris and Hoover fields and thinks they are comparable and both require work. He said that Harris is a county field, so the make up of the Reds' team players could represent kids in Yorkville and among the county. The fields that Parks and Recreation control that YYBS can use are Fox Hill,Beecher, Van Emmon, and Hoover in the future. YYBS has separate agreements with the schools and YYBS maintained those school fields. Kim Hanson, involved with the Reds, feels YYBS over exaggerates the need for fields. Last year the Reds asked for Parks and Recreation fields and were denied. The Reds had an arrangement to use high school fields. Then YYBS pulled out their agreement with the school district and the Reds were told the high school fields could not be used. As a result of that, YYBS had use of all high school fields,both Circle Center fields,and all Parks and Recreation fields. Seth Schoonover said YYBS did use 2 back high school fields. For practice the field with no fence was used. The big tree field was used for girls' transition softball. He stated with 60' bases, only young kids could use those fields. During the summer,the boys' freshman field was used twice a week for practice for YYBS. Three times a week the freshman summer league used that field as well. Seth Schoonover hopes the middle school would have school ball and that the new school would have an 80 foot baseball field. Maybe in the summer, other organizations could get duel use of it. The Reds would regret losing the field at Hoover. However,the Board is trying to compromise with alternate options, so the Reds are not denied their field requests. It takes $490,000 to light the 3 fields in Grand Reserve. A 4-5 baseball field complex is envisioned at Hoover. After that construction, lighting those fields may be a phase 2 project. The staff's concern of building an additional baseball field at Hoover in the near future is that it might only be temporary. Once Hoover is developed for City recreation, the location of the fields might change. Steve Hanson wondered if YYBS could start its season 1 week earlier and extend it 1 week later. These 2 extra weeks would open up 17 fields times 5 time slots. That would be 85 time slots. If you add in 2 Saturdays, it could add close to 300 time slots. Without Hoover,the Reds are asking for 8 time slots a week for 12 weeks which would add up to 96 requested time slots. The extra 2 weeks would give a bigger window for rain out games. The Board needs more time to make progress. YYBS gave the time slot schedule to the Board. YYBS will have its schedule ready by March 1st.. A few big schedule changes do happen from March through May. Sue Swithin, addressing the Reds representatives, said that Parks and Recreation Staff have the obligation to help the largest population of people. After that group, in this case YYBS, is blocked in,then other groups have what remains. If YYBS did not have the current program,Parks and Recreation would take up that responsibility. She would like to see the Reds work with the school district as a feeder program when more fields are available, similar to the youth football program. It is the Board's responsibility to work with Seth Schoonover,the School Liaison, and utilize the fields as best as they can be. Parks and Recreation has the responsibility to take care of the largest group and provide facilities for the tax payers. The school district can help additional programs like the Reds. On the YYBS Field Requirement page, school fields were not listed. However, Seth Schoonover met with YYBS and they plan to use some. YYBS offered to pay for a fence on one of the fields. He hopes for 70-80 foot baseline transition fields at the new middle school/park site. The Board would like to schedule the Reds baseball teams. The Board members are aware that the Reds are scheduling in good faith and want to accommodate both organizations. NEW BUSINESS: Autumn Creek Park A Equipment Recommendation The Parks and Recreation Board has a list of 6 playgroup manufacturers' proposals for the transportation themed park at Autumn Creek. This park is near a school site. Laura Haake and Staff recommend NuToys for the 5-12 year old play structure including loop, circular play with upper body equipment. Two airplanes will be on top(steel or aluminum)with a full pilot and driving panel. From Zenon Company, a shelter looks like a filling station with a clock and gas pumps. It could be called "Green Standard Filling Station",named after an original Yorkville station. The shelter is 25 feet by 16 feet and fits two 8 foot picnic tables. Zenon would provide some equipment for the 2-5 year old play structure such as a roadster, stairs, slide, climber, and driving panel. The swings will be in their own area with 2 bays of belt swings and 1 bay of tot swings (6 swings total). Autumn Creek Park A will have working traffic signals, signage, and striping so it can be used for Safety Town. A railroad crossing is 60-80 feet from the roadway. Another sitting area without a shelter, but with trees and picnic tables will be used with the Safety program too. The developer is enthusiastic about the plans and will front fund the park. Laura Haake will do the construction documents and the developer will build it according to the Parks and Recreation specifications. Other amenities of the park are a 10'-12' sledding hill and a mini skate park. The skate park includes a table top (regular picnic table made for skating), a grind box, and concrete stairs. Laura Haake and Scott Sleezer would like to start planting more native trees to the area, but also unusual varieties such as Kentucky Coffee,Horse Chestnut, Tulip, and Walnut trees. The diversity would help prevent disease infected trees. Flowering trees will still be used too. The budget is about$300,000 per annexation agreement. The developer will most likely do some fine grading, earthwork, and seeding to help absorb some costs,possibly a savings of$29,075. The savings would come to the Parks and Recreation in land cash dollars. This park will be near a new school site. After viewing and talking with the school about their site, Parks and Recreation wants to compliment that area and plan different open space activities Van Truman motioned for the approval of the recommendation of play equipment from a variety of manufacturers for the transportation theme park of Autumn Creek A for $81,148.00. Debbie Horaz seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Ken Koch—Yes, Van Truman–Yes, Gary Golinski—Yes, Debbie Horaz—Yes, and Seth Schoonover–Yes. The motion was unanimously approved. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes from the special meeting of August 21"regarding Westbury Village are still under revision. Those meeting minutes will be on the next meeting's agenda along with the minutes from the September 25h special meeting. The minutes from the September 14, 2006 Park and Recreation Board Meeting were approved on motion by Gary Golinski and seconded by Debbie Horaz. The motion was unanimously approved. BILLS REVIEW: Cash Analysis&Bills List Gary Golinski motioned to approve the cash analysis and bills list. The motion was seconded by Van Truman. Roll call vote: Ken Koch—Yes,.Van Truman–Yes, Gary Golinski—Yes,Debbie Horaz—Yes, and Seth Schoonover–Yes. The motion was unanimously approved. OLD BUSINESS: Board Retreat Agenda and Update Board Members discussed modifying the list of 14 possible agenda items to discuss during the Board Retreat. "Special Recreation Association"can be discussed at a future Board meeting. Research needs to be done to identify the number of special needs people in the community and what are the special needs. Dave Mogle has the name of someone to possibly contract out to do this research. Sue Swithin thought park and recreation land,park amenities, facilities, and programs should be counted and then the Board would discuss how they fit with the national standards. This would lead into the short term goals(1-3 years) and long term goals (4-10). Retreat discussions will allow the Board to compile questions to ask the community for the future survey. Sue Swithin will try to look at the last community survey and summarize what was or will be accomplished soon for the community and what is still lacking. This should be discussed near the end of the retreat. Preparing to talk about the Comprehensive Plan,updated demographics should be known through census data. City growth will relate to almost all agenda items. Debbie Horaz stated that many of the recreation programs are sport related. Perhaps the cultural programs can be expanded like art,music, and nature classes. Future staffing was mentioned and the possibility of a marketing person, a certified arborist, additional park planning staff, and facility maintenance staff may be proposed. The Board Retreat agenda items were limited to the following: 1) Comprehensive Plan, 2)Recreation Programs and Facilities (including Hoover utilization and park/school relationships), 3)Future staffing/organizational structure (city growth impact), 4) Short/ long term goals, 5) Community survey(city growth impact), 6)Revenue enhancement, and 7)Land Acquisition Plan. The Friday opening session of the retreat will include working on a vision statement . On October 3rd, Dave Mogle, Sue Swithin, Scott Sleezer, and Facilitator Laurie Gibson will meet about the retreat and discuss the agenda items. Hoover Conceptual Plan Review Dave Mogle and Jason Pettit met last week to revisit the original Hoover Conceptual Plan that was completed a couple of years ago. The Board was asked to consider possible adjustments to areas of the originally proposed Hoover plan or new ideas. For example, a family aquatic center was included originally,but Yorkville will gain a private water park in the near future,thus possibly making a public aquatic facility less of a priority. Winter recreation activities included as ideas were cross country skiing with well groomed trails, a refrigerated outdoor ice skating rink,and sledding hills. Other ideas were additional picnic areas, a maintenance facility built to care for the 60-80 acres, BMX tournament style track, and a butterfly museum. Still other proposed options were a rustic-looking recreation center for classes and might include a gym, a big skate park, a large playground with more than usual elements with interactive features including the 5 senses, full outdoor basketball courts, a ropes course, and an amphitheater. Parks and Recreation Board and Staff will update and revise plans for Hoover in the future. REPORTS No reports given for Parks and Recreation. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS NRPA Conference Attendance Dave Mogle will attend the National Park and Recreation Association Annual Conference in Seattle and will miss the Board's next meeting. He shared his itinerary that includes a session on dog parks. Fox Highlands The homeowners of Fox Highlands (adjacent to Raintree) want to give Parks and Recreation 3 parcels of park land. Dave Mogle and Scott Sleezer visited the areas. One area is just too small. A second area is larger,but it has no neighborhood access and is along busy Route 71. The third area is less than'/4 of an acre that borders Route 71 and is between two multiple family housing units. There is already park land in Raintree which is only a couple blocks away and a 1-2 acre wooded site in Windstone near by. Dave Mogle will write a letter to say the Board is not interested in the parcels of Fox Highlands. YMCA The north branch of the YMCA approached the city and would like to partner with Yorkville and its parks and recreation department to build a swimming facility. The facility will be across the street from the Regional Ball Diamonds. The YMCA invited Dave Mogle and a park board member to sit on an Ad Hoc committee to discuss this proposal during lunch. Councilman, Jason Leslie would sit on the committee as well. Debbie Horaz volunteered for that meeting. Swimming is not offered through Parks and Recreation or the School District. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned to Executive Session at 9:52 p.m. following the motion by Debbie Horaz and seconded by Van Truman. The motion was unanimously approved. The meeting reconvened from Executive Session and adjourned at 9:59 p.m. following motion by Debbie Horaz and seconded by Gary Golinski. The motion was unanimously approved. Minute Taker—Eileen Lesak MEMORANDUM TO: Yo r Park Board FROM: Da;M irector o arks and Recreation RE: Old Business DATE: October 12,2006 HOMETOWN DAYS REPORT Sue Swithin will be reporting on Hometown Days expenses for 2006. She will be providing material at he meeting on Thursday. WESTBURY DEVELOPMENT Staff will report on the most recent communications with Westbury representatives. The availability of information to share is subject change dependent upon whether this on the agenda for the October 17 COW meeting. Scott will report. BOARD RETREAT Staff will be reporting on the Board Retreat. Since our last meeting Dave, Sue, and Scott met with our facilitator on site. It may be helpful to gather some additional information from the board pertaining to menu choices. TRUCK PURCHASE Scott will be recommending purchase of three trucks through the State Purchasing Program. The trucks were approved in the Parks Capital Budget. MEMORANDUM TO: Yorkville k Board FROM: Dave M gl irector o Parks and Recreation RE: New Business DATE: October 10,2006 GRANDE RESERVE PARK A&B DESIGN SERVICES Staff will present two proposals from Schoppe Design for the design of Parks A and B in Grande Reserve. It will be the staff recommendation to accept these proposals. Attached for background information are a list of desired amenity descriptions(subject to budgetary constraints) for each of the remaining Grande Reserve parks. Scott will give further explanation and answer any questions. Proposed Grande Reserve Parks Amenities Description Park A • Tree House theme playground for 2-12 year olds. • Sand feature. • Funnelball • Small wooden shelter • Four square and Hop scotch • Multiple use field • Ornamental Light • Park Bench • Landscaping Park B • Castle theme playground for 2-12 year olds. • Tetherball court " • Small wooden shelter • 9 Hole disk golf • Landscape mote feature • Ornamental light • Park bench Park C • School theme playground for 2-5 year olds. • Sand play area with spring riders • Tricycle track around playground • Small wooden shelter • Two Jr soccer fields • Park bench • Ornamental light Park F • Dinosaur theme playground for 2-5 year olds. • Tricycle track around playground • Tree shaded sitting area. • Park bench • Ornamental light • Trail access Park G • Nautical theme playground for 5-12 year olds. • Circle basketball with three hoops of different heights. • Multiple use field • Park bench • Ornamental light Park H • Nautical theme playground for 2-5 year olds • Sand feature • Fabric style shelter • Park bench • Ornamental light Schoppe 1Design Associates, Inc. Landscape Architecture and Land Planning 126 S.Main St. Ph.(630)551-3355 Oswego,IL.60543 Fax(630)551-3639 September 27, 2006 Mr. David Mogle United City of Yorkville Park and Recreation Department 800 Game Farm Road Yorkville, IL 60560 RE: Grande Reserve Parks A and B Dear Dave: Please find attached our proposals for Grande Reserve Parks A and B. If you have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Schoppe Design Associates, Inc. Mark Harrison, RLA Senior Project Manager Attach. cc: Mike Schoppe- Schoppe Design Associates,Inc., w/o attach. MH/ld t Schoppe Design Associates, Inc. Landscape Architecture and Land Planning 126 S.Main St. Ph.(630)551-3355 Oswego,IL.60543 Fax(630)551-3639 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT between SCHOPPE DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC.(SDA) 126 SOUTH MAIN STREET OSWEGO,IL 60543 and CITY OF YORKVILLE(COY) PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE,IL 60560 September 27,2006 PART ONE—PROJECT DESCRIPTION Name: Grande Reserve Park B Location: Grande Reserve,Yorkville,Illinois Scope: Program phase through construction documentation phase,and contract administration phase services for site and landscape improvements associated with development of approximately 8.8 acre park. Budget: $129,625 based on current contractor installed costs Client Representative: Dave Mogle,Executive Director of Parks and Recreation Project Principal: Mike Schoppe Project Manager: Mark Harrison Page 1 of 6 r PART TWO—BASIC SERVICES Program Phase: We will conduct a kick-off meeting with you and other design team members to identify: a. Goals and objectives b. Schedule and milestones c. Participants d. Design program e. Budget parameters f. Playground Equipment,shelter,swings,thematic and functional design program g. Other administrative matters Research and Analysis: Using information gathered during the Program Phase,SDA will: 1. Inventory readily available existing data including: a. Physical site information such as: 1. Utilities 2. As-built topographic and boundary survey as provided by COY. 3. Existing vegetation 2. Visit and photograph the site and surrounding areas to become acquainted with: a. Apparent physical conditions b. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation patterns c. Existing conditions and views d. Existing drainage pattern e. Existing vegetation Concept Phase: Using the information gathered during the program phase and the research and analysis phase,SDA will: 1. Prepare two schematic designs illustrating the scale,type,and organization of the proposed site and landscape improvements. Items which will be considered for development in the schematic plans will be: a. Castle Themed Playground for 2—12 year olds b. Tetherball Court c. 9-hold Disk Golf d. Small Wooden Shelter e. Landscape Moat Feature f. Ornamental Light g. Park Benches h. Family Garden Plots i. Benches and Landscaping j. Yard Hydrant Page 2 of 6 t 2. Prepare a preliminary cost opinion of our schematic designs using our generic system costs and an appropriate construction contingency 3. Review schematic designs and cost information with COY(one meeting included) 4. Refine the schematic design plans,based on COY input,into one conceptual design plan. 5. Prepare updated opinion of probable construction costs 6. Submit schematic design plan to COY for Park Board review 7. Attend Park Board meeting to review the schematic design plan(one meeting included) 8. Revise the schematic design plan and opinion of probable construction costs per COY comments,and submit to you for approval Construction Document Phase: After your approval of the Conceptual Design Plan,SDA will: 1. Prepare a request for proposals for playground equipment,the shelter and swings. SDA will review the submitted proposals with COY(one meeting included). COY will select Manufacturers'equipment based upon the proposals submitted and will provide to SDA approved equipment plans and specifications,as prepared by the selected manufacturer,ready to be included in the Construction Documents 2. Based on the Park Board and public comments,and the selected park equipment,SDA will finalize the design,layout,materials,size,horizontal control and vertical control for those items which you have authorized for construction including: a. Landscape Moat Feature b. Ornamental Light c. Park Benches d. Family Garden Plots e. Benches and Landscaping f. Yard Hydrant 3. Document the finalized design on AutoCAD base sheets. 4. Prepare updated estimates of probable construction costs including an appropriate construction contingency. 5. Review drawings and supporting information with COY at 50%and 90%completion(2 meetings included). 6. Revise drawings and supportive information,incorporate COY comments,and submit to you for approval. 7. Following COY approval,SDA will prepare appropriate copies of plans and specifications for general contractors and deliver them to you for your distribution to bidders. Construction Contract Administration Phase Following your approval of the construction documents and specifications and as authorized by the Executive Director of Parks and Recreation,SDA will: Page 3 of 6 I 1. Correspond with and answer incidental questions from contractors and playground manufacturer regarding our documents. 2. Review bids and make recommendations as directed by you. 3. Attend Park Board and City Council meeting to discuss bids. 4. Conduct a pre-construction meeting with the contractor. 5. Observe the work as directed by you,to become familiarized with the progress and quality of the work and determine if the work is generally in conformance with the contract documents(5 site visits estimated). 6. Keep you informed about the progress and quality of the contractor's work by communicating our observations in writing to both parties. 7. Issue recommendations regarding the general conformance of shop drawings,product data and material samples submitted by the contractor,to the design intent expressed in the Contract Documents. 8. Review the Contractors request of acceptance of substantially and finally completed work including preparation of punch list. Additional Services We may provide additional services that are not included in the Basic Services,such as,but not limited to: 1. Revisions to previously-completed and approved phases of our services. 2. Meetings with you or presentation to other parties not specified in the Basic Services. 3. Detailed quantity estimates and/or construction cost opinions using data or format other than our own. 4. Detailed written summaries of our work or our recommendation. 5. Revisions to drawings and other construction documents due to COY conveying to SDA additional or revised base information. 6. Services required due to the discovery of concealed conditions,actions,or other circumstances beyond our control. 7. Modifications or revisions beyond those specified in the Basic Services. If circumstances arise during our performance of the Basic Services,which we believe requires additional services, we will promptly notify you about the nature,extent and probable additional cost of the additional services and perform only such additional services following your written authorizations. PART THREE—COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT Basic Services: You agree to compensate us for the services described in Part Two of this Agreement as follows: Page 4 of 6 Program Phase through Construction Document Phase......................... Fixed Fee$17,200 Total............................................................................... Fixed Fee$17,200 Contract Administration Phase (When requested by Executive Director of Parks and Recreation)...Hourly(approx.$2,500) Additional Services: You agree to compensate us for additional services as described in this agreement. Expenses: You agree to compensate us,in addition to the fees,for the following out of pocket expenses: Printing Services and Courier Service.............................. Cost plus 15% Standard Rates: Project Principal.......................................................$ 175.00 per hour Project Management.................................................. $ 120.00 per hour Project Design......................................................... $ 100.00 per hour Drafting..................................................................$ 75.00 per hour Administrative Support............................................... $ 65.00 per hour These rates are effective thm December 31,2006,after which SDA will provide an updated rate schedule. Payment: Invoices: Each month,we will provide invoices that describe the invoice period,the services rendered,fees and expenses due. Invoices for hourly fees will describe the tasks,hours,and hourly rates for the service completed. Payments will be due 30 days from date of invoice. We reserve the right to suspend our services if you have unpaid invoices over 60 days old. PART FOUR—ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Credit You agree to give us proper credit for our professional services in your official communications,published articles, and temporary project identification signage. Client Responsibilities COY will provide the following base information to SDA before proceeding with the Research and Analysis Phase: 1. Paper and AutoCAD compatible file of a recent"as-built'survey including: a. Improvements to the property made by others. b. Property lines and comers. C. Contour lines at one foot intervals. d. Existing walks and pavement lines along adjacent streets. e. Existing street lights adjacent to properly. f. Location of underground utilities in or adjacent to property. Page 5 of 6 g. Rim and invert elevations of storm sewer structure in and adjacent to property. h. Electrical primary and secondary locations and capacities for overhead and/or underground lines and transformers,on site and adjacent to the site. 2. Boundary survey showing property lines,dimensions and easements Construction Phase Limitations SDA will not supervise,direct,or control the Contractor's work. We have no authority or responsibility for the methods,techniques,or sequencing of construction,or for the safety or welfare of the Contractor's forces. Accordingly,we do not guarantee the performance of the contractor. Certification or other opinions of the contractor's work will be based on our periodic observations and data supplied to us by the contractor. You acknowledge that we will not make continuous or exhaustive observations of the work and that our recommendations for preliminary acceptance of partially or substantially completed work,and do not assure the final acceptance of work,which may subsequently be found to be defective. Cost and Ouantity Opinion We estimate certain quantity and/or costs for your convenience. The contractor is responsible for determining actual quantities and providing sufficient labor,services,equipment,and materials to complete the work as drawn and specified. PART FIVE—ACCEPTANCE Please indicate your acceptance of this Agreement by signing and returning both originals to us. A countersigned agreement will be returned to you. This proposal may be modified or withdrawn unless executed within 30 days. Accepted by: Date: Dave Mogle,Executive Director of Parks and Recreation Accepted by: Date: Mike Schoppe,Schoppe Design Associates,Inc. Page 6 of 6 Schoppe Design Associates, Inc. Landscape Architecture and Land Planning 126 S.Main St. Ph.(630)551-3355 Oswego,1L.60543 Fax(630)551-3639 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT between SCHOPPE DESIGN ASSOCIATES,INC.(SDA) 126 SOUTH MAIN STREET OSWEGO,IL 60543 and CITY OF YORKVILLE(COY) PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 800 GAME FARM ROAD YORKVILLE,IL 60560 September 27,2006 PART ONE—PROJECT DESCRIPTION Name: Grande Reserve Park A Location: Grande Reserve,Yorkville,Illinois Scope: Program phase through construction documentation phase,and contract administration phase services for site and landscape improvements associated with development of approximately 5.1 acre park. Budget: $119,750 based on current contractor installed costs Client Representative: Dave Mogle,Executive Director of Parks and Recreation Project Principal: Mike Schoppe Project Manager: Mark Harrison Page 1 of 6 PART TWO—BASIC SERVICES Program Phase: We will conduct a kick-off meeting with you and other design team members to identify: a. Goals and objectives b. Schedule and milestones c. Participants d. Design program e. Budget parameters f. Playground Equipment,shelter,swings,thematic and functional design program g. Other administrative matters Research and Analysis: Using information gathered during the Program Phase,SDA will: 1. Inventory readily available existing data including: a. Physical site information such as: 1. Utilities 2. As-built topographic and boundary survey as provided by COY. 3. Existing vegetation 2. Visit and photograph the site and surrounding areas to become acquainted with: a. Apparent physical conditions b. Pedestrian and vehicular circulation patterns c. Existing conditions and views d. Existing drainage pattern e. Existing vegetation Concept Phase: Using the information gathered during the program phase and the research and analysis phase,SDA will: 1. Prepare two schematic designs illustrating the scale,type,and organization of the proposed site and landscape improvements. Items which will be considered for development in the schematic plans will be: a. Tree House Themed Playground for 5—12 year olds b. Sand Feature c. Funnel ball d. Small Wooden Shelter e. Four Square and Hop Scotch f. Multiple-use Field(no back stop or goals) g. Ornamental Light h. Park Bench i. Landscaping j. Paving and Surfacing Page 2 of 6 2. Prepare a preliminary cost opinion of our schematic designs using our generic system costs and an appropriate construction contingency 3. Review schematic designs and cost information with COY(one meeting included) 4. Refine the schematic design plaps,based on COY input,into one conceptual design plan. 5. Prepare updated opinion of probable construction costs 6. Submit schematic design plan to COY for Park Board review 7. Attend Park Board meeting to review the schematic design plan(one meeting,if needed,included) 8. Revise the schematic design plan and opinion of probable construction costs per COY comments,and submit to you for approval Construction Document Phase: After your approval of the Conceptual Design Plan,SDA will: 1. Prepare a request for proposals for playground equipment,the shelter and swings. SDA will review the submitted proposals with COY(one meeting included). COY will select Manufacturers'equipment based upon the proposals submitted and will provide to SDA approved equipment plans and specifications as prepared by the selected manufacturers,ready to be included in the Construction Documents 2. Based on Park Board and public comments,and the selected park equipment,SDA will finalize the design,layout,materials,size,horizontal control and vertical control for those items which you have authorized for construction including: a. Four Square and Hop Scotch b. Multiple-use Field(no back stop or goals) c. Ornamental Light d. Park Bench e. Landscaping f. Paving and Surfacing 3. Document the finalized design on AutoCAD base sheets. 4. Prepare updated estimates of probable construction costs including an appropriate construction contingency. 5. Review drawings and supporting information with COY at 50%and 90%completion(2 meetings included). 6. Revise drawings and supportive information,incorporate COY comments,and submit to you for approval. 7. Following COY approval,SDA will prepare appropriate copies of plans and specifications for general contractors and deliver them to you for your distribution to bidders. Page 3 of 6 Construction Contract Administration Phase Following your approval of the construction documents and specifications and as authorized by the Executive Director of Parks and Recreation,SDA will: 1. Correspond with and answer incidental questions from contractors and playground manufacturer regarding our documents. 2. Review bids and make recommendations as directed by you. 3. Attend Park Board and City Council meeting to discuss bids. 4. Conduct a pre-construction meeting with the contractor. 5. Observe the work as directed by you,to become familiarized with the progress and quality of the work and determine if the work is generally in conformance with the contract documents(5 site visits estimated). 6. Keep you informed about the progress and quality of the contractor's work by communicating our observations in writing to both parties. 7. Issue recommendations regarding the general conformance of shop drawings,product data and material samples submitted by the contractor,to the design intent expressed in the Contract Documents. 8. Review the Contractors request of acceptance of substantially and finally completed work including preparation of punch list. Additional Services We may provide additional services that are not included in the Basic Services,such as,but not limited to: 1. Revisions to previously-completed and approved phases of our services. 2. Meetings with you or presentation to other parties not specified in the Basic Services. 3. Detailed quantity estimates and/or construction cost opinions using data or format other than our own. 4. Detailed written summaries of our work or our recommendation. 5. Revisions to drawings and other construction documents due to COY conveying to SDA additional or revised base information. 6. Services required due to the discovery of concealed conditions,actions,or other circumstances beyond our control. 7. Modifications or revisions beyond those specified in the Basic Services. If circumstances arise during our performance of the Basic Services,which we believe requires additional services, we will promptly notify you about the nature,extent and probable additional cost of the additional services and perform only such additional services following your written authorizations. Page 4 of 6 PART THREE—COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT Basic Services: You agree to compensate us for the services described in Part Two of this Agreement as follows: Program Phase through Construction Document Phase......................... Fixed Fee$13,800 Total.............................................................................. Fixed Fee$13,800 Contract Administration Phase (When requested by Executive Director of Parks and Recreation)...Hourly(approx.$2,000) Additional Services: You agree to compensate us for additional services as described in this agreement at our standard rates. Expenses: You agree to compensate us,in addition to the fees,for the following out of pocket expenses: Printing Services and Courier Service.............................. Cost plus 15% Standard Rates: Project Principal.......................................................$ 175.00 per hour Project Management.................................................. $120.00 per hour Project Design......................................................... $ 100.00 per hour Drafting..................................................................$ 75.00 per hour Administrative Support...............................................$ 65.00 per hour These rates are effective thru December 31,2006,after which SDA will provide an updated rate schedule. Payment: Invoices: Each month,we will provide invoices that describe the invoice period,the services rendered,fees and expenses due. Invoices for hourly fees will describe the tasks,hours,and hourly rates for the service completed. Payments will be due 30 days from date of invoice. We reserve the right to,suspend our services if you have unpaid invoices over 60 days old. PART FOUR—ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS Credit You agree to give us proper credit for our professional services in your official communications,published articles, and temporary project identification signage. Client Responsibilities COY will provide the following base information to SDA before proceeding with the Research and Analysis Phase: 1. Paper and AutoCAD compatible file of a recent"as-built"survey including: Page 5 of 6 4 a. Improvements to the property made by others. b. Property lines and corners. c. Contour lines at one foot intervals. d. Existing walks and pavement lines along adjacent streets. e. Existing street lights adjacent to properly. f. Location of underground utilities in or adjacent to property. g. Rim and invert elevations of storm sewer structure in and adjacent to property. h. Electrical primary and secondary locations and capacities for overhead and/or underground lines and transformers,on site and adjacent to the site. 2. Boundary survey showing property lines,dimensions and easements Construction Phase Limitations SDA will not supervise,direct,or control the Contractor's work. We have no authority or responsibility for the methods,techniques,or sequencing of construction,or for the safety or welfare of the Contractor's forces. Accordingly,we do not guarantee the performance of the contractor. Certification or other opinions of the contractor's work will be based on our periodic observations and data supplied to us by the contractor. You acknowledge that we will not make continuous or exhaustive observations of the work and that our recommendations for preliminary acceptance of partially or substantially completed work,and do not assure the final acceptance of work,which may subsequently be found to be defective. Cost and Ouantity Opinion We estimate certain quantity and/or costs for your convenience. The contractor is responsible for determining actual quantities and providing sufficient labor,services,equipment,and materials to complete the work as drawn and specified. PART FIVE—ACCEPTANCE Please indicate your acceptance of this Agreement by signing and returning both originals to us. A countersigned agreement will be returned to you. This proposal may be modified or withdrawn unless executed within 30 days. Accepted by: Date: Dave Mogle,Executive Director of Parks and Recreation Accepted by: Date: Mike Schoppe,Schoppe Design Associates,Inc. Page 6 of 6 Site Data Total Site 103m Percent Feature Road*Road R.O.A.' 37.31 9.00 .� Feature ial 21.40 2.06 UmmoutiY :'i r j•l- Commerclel 444 043 Open Space(1nal.DeL,Parke k Buffers)352.48 33.96 •`,, ,'•`" Residential , 1522.211 69.96 Oman silo Density .2,66 D.V./Ao. (EB48 D.V./1097.81 An.) •�� ,.....i.•.1 ,;;,. Reeidentlel Area - �;jt. Reddens OAp-.. ••:�i,-L:'i�.p..,,.�f.. Neteh6erheed mAye Average 1Unh=m Typical 1 Single Family VLLI■a t i - " ULTift lot9ldty g NA NA NA 2 p 'Bra-PamLLY 10,000 NA BO Ft. 80 Ft. 128 OPT ";+''• S Townhanves NA �'• •, `4 4 NA Multi-Family NA NA NA NA 24d ./' I _',:.:�P}•; •'.�-.. '. 6 Townhomes NA NA NA NA 300 NA 184 ••., 14 _-.�11 i''j--:i 7 To-homes NA NA NA NA 160 �:.(,..:, -•�_:: 7 TewnhOmes NA NA NA NA 142 '•,'(' < %J-j y,. 5 Two-ramfly 10.000 NA , NA NA S le Family E24 gin 2 y 10,000 11.600 70 F!. 76 FL 1$5 I `..:!}„•.� 10 Single Family 10,000 11.600 70 FL 75 Ft. 84 it Single Family 10,000 11,600 70 Ft. 76 Pt. "' ,`�;t„; •-I' 12 Single Family 11,000 I2.060 76 Pt. 80 Ft. BO 7filO�ORH000 1 -•'1 STpIIYBOOK .. to Family `•'I i !9 Single PsmOy 11,000 1E,060 76 M 80 Fl. HIOHLAND9 Spy y VNas -1 L•� i'�}' 14 Single Family 12,000 13.600 80 FL 86 Ft. 118 SUBDIVISION 16 Slagle Family 12,000 13.800 60 FL 85 FL 91n Og„ Single Family 1!,000 12.850 75 Ft. 80 Ft. 98.. - -- l7 Single Family 12.000 10.000 80 FL 85 Ft. 169 I ' l6 Single Family 12,000 13,860 BO FL 66 Ft. 60 19 9lpgla Family 12,000 13.600 LO Ft. 85 FL -0 a , Total 2846 '°l.f ` .h - .J.1 PROPO ERRY fi_ y-.. BLACKB Open 8pnos Breakdown KNOLL Suburban Transitional Total SUBDIVISION M Ares Aerea Are.Acres Amen Jghbarimad gogimA, VILLAGE OF 1 nalalpa191ts 0.62 2.00 2.6E E.6E OSWECO Community Clubhause/Reo.Area 6.10 6.10 6,10 •�' THE SHEPHERD RpaO.• I HOA School B Site/perk 91ter 6.20 180.91 117.51 07.68 67.63 .,``- i ENP-'- --•"r "' 'LUTHERAN CHURCH ROA Bttttars 27.65 80.00 107.65 107.66 i Pprk 9tormwater Management 3 as se j� 180.47 --- •"_.j. _'S'A4" - i i ;' ` Total 71.41 281.07 352.48 206.95 56.69 ,V7AC,N,J''1..,, s i 5118. I , ROAD j xear \ 1 3.All perimeter lot[adJaeent to ealding County rubdlHdoaa will _ •• have a minimum 25 Ft.landscape buffer easement in addition to the j required rear yard. \ .:'.1 ;Pork y�RON Summary r'"'6. I FUTURE MEAD • PARK AND RIDE xaiti-Family, -vow At .T �JiPANY�+ I -. IN FACILITY TowOhomss 707 EDI�N Two-Femlly 360 Single Family Villas 290 yyEpLTM P _ stops Fatuity n99 }. CMMON k �. le�c1� „! Total 2940 . - ':j �•I IN x. + !WEST UNIT I LAW 0vh3T U IN TEi 4. �' Schod '1 1--t . . i 1: Open ' ...! ...;..�t.. ;._.., Space j' I HuNtsvxte(aaa TOWN) BLACKBERRY OAKS I - -•• .._ -- , FORMERLY(SMST0.STATION) SUBDIVISION r._, i-N"Caw•ORATED eRISWO •-_. . , 1 SF I gi -.._. i .. t.:'..°_J-i:-:C.__j.�a;ir, I 1 L lOOD SUBDIVISION I; v f ' + i I 102 S..SOM9.7 "th"dt u 811& BA- J K t �• . (Q�j�b� t t• 1-�. ,,� ,``•,J "EISYjHL.� e.mcT-. �......f .,. V I 8 R RICE RR _✓ ^ 7 _ j• 1 . - ♦` •9N f'W"Fd6 Ir •. _. T' ��`CW Ce sae ate ♦ Bloakberry Creak i „/�:/ ..._ !_ •L... . 'Simservatlan Aria -. � �• i Or I P. ' � �� .E.. �44'•v tl I 'r� , Y� r O� /�3IpWa�y E. /. tFw.F - f /x % \ r r r XA�ef Rltl a aY�tlM]IM OI 9unNl •�/` ., h a•�-- >a _ ._. ... ..... ......... ......... _.. ....._...-.... ._......,. _____ I. M�ol*oil q eW.Wed at U..of ?C nl as P1190.e4ah�l1 ah n1.1went P Ia.�� ✓ . pIc illha to 7 bt Oale«Int 10W,, j, tN a hMberhNIrotl o/$I fl«MUM,, �/' �rJ•�'1 4 % ' to Nagnb«Ilee�I�d:14. • •l�! � �'`�j'"'°`'ate i •/�' .-0�.µSry Exhibit "C" • „•-� Group . 08-20ne Job N. 3y90 MIDI Yorkville 00-20-07 Concept Plan 97_21_03 0-0 MEN LAND DESIGN, INC 535 Plainfield Road Suits E let• 0L_23-a� WIIiOwhrook,IL 60527 GRANDE RESERVE PLANNING•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE (830)325-4500 Yorkville, Illinois 5517 RCombesknd,S1a906 OkagaX 60656.773/763-M I Ph:773.7613320 Fac 77J.761.J37S teat jwMiSswittOwl f' YORKVILLE RECREATION DEPARTMENT Park Board Meeting Month of September - 2006 Highlights and Summary.: We kicked off the month of September with the United City of Yorkville Annual Hometown Days Festival over Labor Day weekend. Over 13,0000 people attended the three day event and were able to enjoy numerous activities such as a carnival,petting zoo, climbing wall,karate demonstrations,baby contest,pet parade and a car show to name a few. Nearly 50 local vendors were present selling all kinds of food,like pizza,hot dogs,burritos,ears of corn as well, all sorts of beverages and other items to the participants.Each night capped off the days activities with a headline music act. We also held our second high school dance with once again over 120 kids attending and with the CPA's helping supervise the night.And lastly we had our final Movie Night on Friday Sept. 15&and while it was a bit chilly nearly 100 people came out and watched Herbie Fully Loaded and we are putting the finishing touches on our Halloween Egg Hunt that will be held on Saturday Oct.28th at Town Square. During the month of September we started the first sessions of Kindermusik,Moms and Tots,Dinosaurs Bugs and Trucks Oh My!,Princess Playtime,Moving and Grooving,Little Learners,Busy Bees,Jewelry Making,SOAR,Chefs in Training,Dance, Dog Classes,Book Club,Knitting Club,and a National City Seminar. Parkers Playtime Pre School started their year off in September as well. We had a lot of happy faces for the first day of Pre School.All four classes for Pre School are full. Fall Soccer is running very smoothly. Weather has been good enough to play games every Saturday. We are using fields at Fox Hill,Beecher and Grande Reserve. Competitive teams have been playing teams from Sandwich and doing well. The U12 team is looking really good and doing real well as far as level of ability. Regular season softball ended and playoffs start Oct. 51`. All six teams will make the playoffs with the l5`and 2d place teams getting a first round bye. 7 h and 8 h grade girls travel basketball registration has ended. There are 10 girls on each team. The teams will compete in the Fox Valley Park Districts league and have few travel games as well. Preparations are being made for the up coming winter basketball season. Seasonal Classes/Programs -September: • Hometown Days Event Yoga Book Club • Movie in the Park Dance Classes Pilates • Famer's Market Knitting Club Kindermusik ■ Blackberry Golf lessons Morning Munchkins Soccer League • All Star Soccer All Star T-Ball Softball League • Dog Obedience Classes Moving&Grooving Parkers Playtime Pre School ■ Moms and Tots Little Learners Busy Bees ■ Princess Playtime Jewelry Making SOAR ■ Dinosaurs Bugs and Trucks National City Seminar Chefs in Training Fall Quarter—as of 9/30/06 Different Types: — 33 (different curriculum) • Sections - 110 Enroll..- 139 Sp.Event — 13,480 Ran—61 (55%) Cancelled— 12 (11%) Pending—37(34%) Class No.-Residents—100 (72%) Non-res-39 (28%) • Last year Fall: Sections- 121 Enroll—932 Sp.Event —780 Ran-84(69%) Cancelled-37 (31%) Residents-558 (67%) Non-res— 374 (33%) Exit Survey Summary Classes are finishing in October and we will have surveys in next month's report 1 Scholarships Awarded/Grants Received.• Pre School - $25.00 Special Rec- $383.00 Professional Development: The Director will be attending IML Conference and NRPA Conference in October. Administrative Highlights: Finishing work is being done at the Riverfront Recreation Building. The room should be ready for classes starting in October. The Park staff painted the storage shed at the Old Post office for Recreation Dept.equipment.Plans and estimates are being secured for future remodeling of the Old Post Office. Facility AUeements:(Fall ■ We are using the following facilities for our current programs and in the near future: Yorkville Schools: (Middle,Intermediate,Yorkville Grade School,Circle Center Grade School),Yorkville Congregational Church. We have secured another year with YCC to use their rooms for our Pre School. We have terminated the Agreement with Parkview Christian Academy School. We will use our own classroom at the Riverfront Recreation Bldg.and the gym at CCGS and YGS ■ We are using New Life Church on a temporary basis until the Recreation Building is completed. Revenue Producing Hijehlights The Concession Stand will soon be closing for the season once Soccer is finished. There hasn't been much activity at the stand during the soccer season,even though we offer warm beverages and donuts! Upcoming Proiects and Events: • FARMER'S MARKET Saturdays 8:00 am—Noon • Halloween Egg Hunt - Oct.28t` 7:00 pm Respectfully submitted, Sue Swithin Superintendent of Recreation Recreation Department Staff 2