Loading...
City Council Minutes 2005 09-13-05 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE. KENDALL COUNTY, ILLINOIS, HELD IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 800 GAME FARM ROAD ON TUESDAY. SEPTEMBER 13, 2005. Mayor Prochaska called the meeting to order at 7:04 P.M and led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL Clerk Milschewski called the roll. Ward I James Present Leslie Present Ward lI Burd Present Wolfer Present Ward III Ohare Present Munns Present Ward W Besco Present Spears Present Also present: City Clerk Milschewski, City Administrator Graff, City Attorney Wyeth, Police Chief Martin, Director of Public Works Dhuse, Finance Director Pleckham and Executive Director of Parks & Recreation Brown. OUORUM A quorum was established. INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS Mayor Prochaska asked the staff and guests to introduce themselves. He welcomed the guests and asked them to enter their names on the attendance sheet provided. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA Alderman Spears asked that 44 — Development Agreement and Rezoning for Robert and Debra Dearborn and 44a — Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of the Development Agreement and Rezoning for Robert and Debra Dearborn be moved from the consent agenda to under the regular agenda under the Economic Development Committee Report. COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Public Works Committee 7:00 P.M., Monday, September 26, 2005 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Economic Development Committee 7:00 P.M., Thursday, September 15, 2005 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Administration Committee 7:00 P.M., Thursday, October 6, 2005 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Public Safety Committee 6:30 P.M., Monday, October 13, 2005 City of Yorkville Conference Room 800 Game Farm Road Ad Hoc Technology Committee T.B.A. PRESENTATIONS Yorkville Moose Lodge 2371 to Yorkville Police Department Representatives from Moose Lodge 42371 presented Chief Martin with a check in the amount of $1,500.00 to be used towards the purchase of bullet-proof vests for police officers. Both Chief Martin and Mayor Prochaska thanked the Moose for their donation and support. PUBLIC HEARINGS Yorkville- Bristol Sanitary District Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to go into public hearing for the purpose of discussing Yorkville - Bristol Sanitary District, petitioners, request to annex to the United City of Yorkville and rezone from Kendall County A -1 Agricultural to United City of Yorkville A -1 Agricultural The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — September 13, 2005 — uagL2 District with a Special Use for a Water Treatment Facility and for hearing as to the Annexation Agreement of Petitioner. The real property consists of approximately 20.375 acres directly west of the existing Yorkville - Bristol Sanitary District property, Bristol Township, Kendall County, Illinois. So moved by Alderman Ohare; seconded by Alderman Besco. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays-0 Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye, Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye Please see attached Report of Proceedings taken before Christine Vitosh, C.S.R from Depo Court Reporting Service for the transcription of this portion of the public hearing. Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to close of the public hearing. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Ohare. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye, Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye Pulte Home Corporation Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to go into public hearing for the purpose of discussing Pulte Homes Corporation, MPLIVI0, LLC, MPLIV20, LLC, and MLH Yorkville, LLC, petitioners, request to annex to the United City of Yorkville and rezone from Kendall County A -I Agricultural to United City of Yorkville Planned Unit Development consisting of R -2 One Family Residence District, R -3 General Residence District and B -3 Service Business District and for hearing as to the Annexation and Planned Unit Development Agreement of Petitioner. The real property consists of approximately 587 acres at the northwest comer of Galena. Road and Route 47, Bristol Township, Kendall County, Illinois. So moved by Alderman Ohare; seconded by Alderman Spears. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye, Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye Please see attached Report of Proceedings taken before Christine Vitosh, C.S.R. from Depo Court Reporting Service for the transcription of this portion of the public hearing. Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to close of the public hearing. So moved by Alderman Spears; seconded by Alderman Ohare. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays-0 Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye, Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye CITIZEN COMMENTS Mayor Prochaska asked for citizens comments on any subject other than the Senior Facility Use Agreement. He stated he would take citizens comments on that subject under the Mayor's report. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Police Report for July 2005 2. Building Permits Reports for June and July 2005 3. Countryside Interceptor Waiver of 50% Requirement — waive the requirements of item #28 of the Countryside Interceptor Contract with Glenbrook Excavating & Concrete, Inc. concerning a 50% limit on subcontracted work, as recommended by the City Engineer and to authorize the City Engineer to notify Glenbrook of this waiver 4. Ordinance 2005 -74 — Adopting a map Amending an Area in the Northwest Portion of the current Comprehensive Land Use Plan - authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute 5. Lynwood Baptist Church — 1 % Mile Review 6. Resolution 2005 -58 — adopting revised Sponsorship Policy and Request Form - authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. So moved by Alderman Munns; seconded by Alderman Ohare. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Mums -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye, Ohare -aye, Besco -aye The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — September 13. 2005 — uagg 3 PLANNING COMMISSION /ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL No report. MINUTES FOR APPROVAL A motion was made by Alderman James to approve the minutes of the City Council meetings of July 26, 2005, August 9, 2005 and August 23, 2005; seconded by Alderman Ohare. Clerk Milschewski noted that the Committee meeting dates on the August 23, 2005 minutes were incorrect. She indicated that they will be corrected on the final copy. Motion approved as corrected by a viva voce vote. BILLS FOR APPROVAL A motion was made by Alderman James to approve the paying of the bills listed on the Detailed Board Report dated August 31, 2005 and revised September 8, 2005 totaling the following amounts: checks in the amount of $1,314,991,51 (vendors — revised 9/8//05); $164,555.62 (payroll period ending 8/20/05); for a total of $1,479,547.13 seconded by Alderman Ohare. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye, Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT Revised Senior Facility Use Agreement Mayor Prochaska reported that the City Council had a revised Senior Facility Use Agreement in their meeting packet. He asked Attorney Wyeth if there had been any other revisions. Attorney Wyeth stated that the copy that they have includes changes identified at the last Committee of the Whole (COW) meeting and verified with Senior Services Associates. Mayor Prochaska opened the floor for public comment. Identa Austin, Vice President of Senior Services Associates addressed the City Council and questioned the following items: • Page 1, Paragraph 1— she questioned the wording used in the last sentence stating "...areas commonly referred to as involving "Senior" citizens..." She asked that it be changed. • Page 1, Paragraph 2 — she noted that the word "provided" is spelled incorrectly. • Page 1, Paragraph 3 — she asked that "many years" be changed to "twenty -two years • Page 1, Paragraph 4 — she asked that "several years" be changed to "five years" and she noted that "an" should be corrected to "and ". • Page 1, paragraph 5 — she asked that the wording be changed from "... entering SSA use of... " to "... entering a use agreement of... ". • Page 1, pa 7 — she asked the wording to be changed from "...building is suitable... " to "...building can be made suitable... " • Page 1, Paragraph 9 — she asked that "main room' be changed to "Perkins room ". When Mrs. Austin's comments did not correlate to the current draft, it was determined by Alderman Spears that Mrs. Austin had a copy of her marked up copy and not the current draft. After some discussion it was decided that approval of the agreement would be contingent on Senior Services Associates' approval in order to address Mrs. Austin's revisions. Nancy Huntington, a six year resident of Yorkville addressed the City Council. She stated that for the last three years she has been using the Senior Services Associates and that the things the seniors have been reading in the newspapers are unsettling. She stated that the information makes it appear that seniors are not important however the services provided by Senior Services Associates and the issues they address are very important. She appealed to the City Council to have Senior Services Associates remain in Yorkville. Identa Austin addressed the City Council again in order to give them the history of the Beecher Center and its use as a senior citizen center. She covered the 1977 ordinance creating the Beecher Community Center Committee; Clarence Beecher's endowment; obtaining the land from the Game Farm; obtaining grants for the senior portion of building and the 1981 agreement for the use of grant funds. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — Sentember 13.2005 — vage 4 She explained that Senior Services Associates moved from the Beecher Center to the Countryside Center when it outgrew the facility. She noted that Clarence Beecher's endowment (came from the estate sale of his farm outside of Yorkville) and many pledges to build the Center came from outside of Yorkville. She hoped that the seniors would be able to find a home in the Beecher Building once again. Gary Golinski, 502 N.Redhorse, addressed the Council. He stated that he felt that the seniors deserve a place in Yorkville however he questioned if Park & Recreation programs would have to be cut back because they are moving to the old Castle Bank building basement. Mayor Prochaska noted that the space in the bank is almost double that of the space used in the Beecher Center. Park & Recreation Director Brown stated that no programs will be cut back at this time however Superintendent of Recreation Sue Swithin noted that there are too many unknowns surrounding the new location to determine if programs will need to be cut back. Ms. Brown also stated that the construction was being coordinated in such a way so that the Park & Recreation Department would not be displaced. Alderman Spears stated that she has heard comments and concerns regarding the upgrading of the Castle Bank building basement which developer Harold Oliver is upgrading with elevators. She stated that if the senior citizens used the facility they would be located in the basement with wheelchairs, crutches, etc and she felt there was a public safety concern because in the event of a fire the elevators would be turned of She asked if the seniors would be expected to hop up the stairs or carry each other up when evacuating the building. She stated that she did not want to see children located in the basement however children are capable of walking up the stairs and escaping. She also noted that the Austin room at the Beecher Center was named after Identa Austin. She asked if the City Council was telling the seniors, like Mrs. Austin, who worked hard to create the community that is attracting developers that they are sorry but they cannot find an appropriate location because there are other programs. She stated that in the last seven years that she has been on the Council, she has never heard seniors complain about not having recreational programs for them. She did note that there are a few programs for seniors now. She stated that the seniors pay taxes and are expecting something in return. Alderman Spears compared the senior citizens in Yorkville to the displaced victims of hurricane Katrina; the message being sent to the seniors is that Yorkville is creating its own disaster, The City Council is telling the seniors that they "may" possibly find another location for them. Alderman Spears stated that the Beecher Center is a temporary fix and stated that the seniors should be considered. She stated that people should stop thinking of personal gain or if this is affecting the children of Yorkville; the children have enough parks and the City is providing quite a bit for the younger population. She stated that she has heard that people do not want to take their children across town to other locations such as Cross Lutheran School however she did not expect seniors to drive across town either. She stated that other communities such as Oswego and Plano would like to have a community center for seniors however she felt this would be like relocating the people in New Orleans to Texas. They have a place but its not home. She stated she wanted to keep these people as close to home as possible. Van Truman, Park Board member and resident, addressed the City Council. He stated he agreed that Yorkville should keep the seniors in Yorkville and that he would like to see a senior facility built here. He commended both Mrs. Austin and Alderman Spears for their work with senior matters. He expressed his concern that this is being called a short-term solution however the contract is for five years. He stated that five years to a twelve- year-old child brings this contract to an end when the child is going off to college. He questioned if the Beecher Center was the best venue for the seniors and stated that he has asked this question before and has not been convinced that this the best location. Mayor Prochaska tried to answer Mr. Truman's concerns: 1. The contract is for five years however it states that with sixty days notice it can be terminated by either party. If the contract is terminated by the City, it would have to provide another location for Senior Services Associates. If the City cannot do this, it would pay back, on a pro -rated basis, the money invested by Senior Services Associates. 2. Several other locations were investigated; from a location in the industrial park to the old Castle Bank building to building a new building. Senior Services Associates needs to relocate as soon as possible so building a new building at this time was not a viable option. The Beecher Center was chosen because the senior nutrition program is presently located there and has a history of working with the Senior Services Associates, it is centrally located and most people are familiar with the facility. 3. When the seniors are eventually relocated to a permanent facility, the United City of Yorkville will have an updated building without and funds being expended. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — September 13. 2005 — page 5 4. The City is moving forward to develop other private /public ventures to provide services to the senior. Mayor Prochaska reminded those in attendance that the Senior Services Associates is a non - for -profit organization. Mayor Prochaska further explained that the search continues; he has spoken to several developers who are interested in building a senior center and recently the City was informed that the post office building is available. This building sits in the approximate area where it has been proposed to have a senior center. He also stated that a developer has inquired about building anew City Hall building in the downtown which would leave the present building available. Rita Murphy addressed the City Council and clarified that the seniors finding a new location has not been an overnight thing. She explained that the Senior Ad Hoc Committee has been meeting since April 2005, other locations have been investigated and many people have been making great efforts to resolve the situation. ➢ A motion was made by Alderman Spears to bring the matter to vote; on locating the Senior Service Center in the Beecher Community Center. Mayor Prochaska noted that the motion should be approved subject to legal review. He also noted that there was a formal motion written in the City Council's handout. Attorney Wyeth stated that per the City Council's discussion, wording should be added to the motion indicating that approval is subject to Senior Services Associates' approval of the agreement and upon legal review. ➢ A motion was made by Alderman Spears to approve the revised Senior Facility Use Agreement as presented and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement subject to legal review and approval by Senior Services Associate; seconded by Alderman Burd. Alderman Besco commented that although the Senior Ad Hoc Committee has worked on this for a long time, he found it disturbing that the use of the Beecher Center did not come to the City Council to just recently. He stated that if the relocation had been shared with the City Council, they could have worked with the Senior Ad Hoc Committee. He stated that he has received calls from many residents regarding this. He commented that he has nothing against senior citizens and even proposed that the city build a facility with a community center for the seniors to use at a recent joint Public Works Committee and Park Board meeting. He stated that he was opposed to the agreement because of its five -year term because within the next two years, the mayor and four aldermen are up for re- election. He felt that a completely different Council might not pursue building a senior center. He further explained that he felt a two -year term would make the present City Council actively pursue a new building. He stated that he was not fond of the plans for the Beecher Center renovation because they destroys some of the integrity of the building and it will never come back to the City the way it was. He felt the renovation was a slap in the face to Mr. Beecher and to everyone who worked on getting the building accomplished and he was going to vote against the agreement. Alderman Burd commented that she felt Alderman Besco was laboring under false assumptions that the Beecher Center as it currently exists is something the City would want to maintain. She stated that she has heard comments regarding the poor acoustics of the Perkins room for a long time and the City should want an approved facility. She felt that Mr. Beecher would not feel upset if he knew the building was being changed because currently it is not good for programming or senior citizens. She expressed her thoughts that the United City of Yorkville presents itself as a "Character Counts" community and character has a lot to do with how one treats the elder residents. She stated that if the elderly are treated well it shows the character of the community. She explained that when she voted for the TIF for Countryside Center, she took on the responsibility to help find a place for the senior citizens and that if she voted against this agreement she would feel guilty that she had not done what she had hoped to do for the seniors of the community. She stated that the City undertook the TIF knowing full well that it would displace Senior Services Associates. She commented that she did not know where Alderman Besco has been not to know that the Senior Services Associates was going to move to the Beecher Center. She stated that she was in favor of the agreement; that it was a winning situation for the City. She further commented that she did not feel the senior's use of the Beecher Center was hurting the youth of the community; she did not see what difference it made to have children taking classes at another building. She stated that everyone has to move around a little until a better solution is found and she felt that everyone should work together in order to make in a win - win situation for everyone. Alderman Munns asked what year was the old Castle Bank building was built. Developer Harold Oliver stated it was built in the early 1970's. Alderman Munns asked if there were enough exits The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — September 13. 2005 — p age 6 from the basement and if Mr. Oliver was bringing the building up to code. Mr. Oliver stated that he was installing an elevator to the basement and that the Park & Recreation Department could move upstairs into the existing bank facility while the basement is being remodeled. He explained that he is asking the Parks Department to pay for the upkeep and utilities on their portion of the building with no additional rent. Alderman Munns state that he felt that as long as the agreement had the 60-day out clause, he did not have a problem with the agreement. He stated that the seniors need to go somewhere and he would rather see the Yorkville seniors have the services in the city not elsewhere. He asked at what age someone could use the Senior Services Associates and was told that anyone over the age of sixty could use the services. Alderman Spears listed several newspaper articles that addressed the senior's relocation and stated that she did not understand how some people could say they were not informed of the situation. She stated that she shared Alderman Burd's sentiment regarding the Countryside TIF and would not have voted in favor of it if she would have thought this would be happening. She stated that she hoped after tonight's vote she did not regret voting for the TV. She commented that Mr. Oliver is trying his hardest to please everyone. She stated that she asked Mr. Oliver several time if he was going to take care of the seniors and he assured her he would. She commended him for his efforts. Alderman Ohare commented that the seniors outgrew Beecher several years ago and she wondered why everyone thought there was enough space now. She further commented that the TV was voted on with the assumption that Mr. Oliver would build a building for the seniors at some time. Mr. Oliver stated that he never agreed to build a building; he agreed to renovate the Beecher Center at no cost to the taxpayers of Yorkville. Alderman Ohare noted that this is a private contract between Senior Services Associates and Mr. Oliver. She asked why the City was getting in the middle of it. She commented that the City would not allow the Chamber of Commerce to move into the Beecher Center. She stated she could not agree to a five -year contract and suggested that a two -year agreement would be better. She stated that if the City wanted to get out of the agreement using the sixty-day window, the taxpayers of Yorkville will have to pay for the buy out. In regards to the newspaper articles, she stated that one of them commented that it would be a "squeeze" going to the Beecher Center. Alderman James commented that he did not feel the city should be involved with providing a location for non - for -profit organization; this should between the Senior Services Associates and the developer. He stated that demolition redesign of Countryside Center has displaced all the businesses located in the center and all the other businesses had to independently find new locations. He stated the he had a problem with the Senior Services Associates having exclusive use of 2/3's of the Beecher Center and he felt that it was not a suitable location. He believed there were other buildings and facilities available that were not pursued and because of this he was not going to vote for the agreement. Alderman Wolfer stated that he agreed with Aldermen Ohare and James. He stated that he was not sure this is the best use of the Beecher Center. He asked why the seniors could not use the old Castle Bank building temporarily until a permanent location is found. Alderman Leslie stated that he and his wife are pro senior, his wife volunteers for the Golden Diners. He stated that he felt he is being put into a position like King Solomon in the Bible; being asked to sever a "child" in two. He stated that he has received calls from residents with children whose recreation programs are being displaced. He noted that there are two opposing groups in this issue and he was discourage that the groups could not come together to attain a peaceful resolution. He commented that when the Executive Director of Senior Services Associates addressed the City Council at a previous meeting, she took a staunch approach and seemed unwavering on some parts of the agreement. He stated that he understood the position Senior Services Associates is in however all parties need to make concessions. He reiterated that the City Council has been put into a position to have to choose between two groups. He stated that it is a difficult decision to make and he was unsure he had all the details to make the right decision. Mayor Prochaska noted that the City Council appeared to be split on approving the agreement and had the following comments: • In regards to the seniors outgrowing the space, he explained that originally they were using the Austin room which is much smaller than the Perkins room. • This is a temporary situation; it is not a final answer but rather the beginning. • Taxpayers will benefit from the improvements being made to the building after the seniors move on. Beecher Center was built as a "nice big room" not a theater, meeting room or gymnasium; it does not work for most of these uses. The proposed alterations such as carpeting may actually have a positive affect on the building. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — September 13. 2005 — Dagg 7 • In regards to the comment that the City does not give space to any other group, he noted that the City's Building Department is a private group and they have an agreement to use the lower level of City Hall. He also noted that non - for -profit groups such as the Boy Scouts and Lyons Club use the Beecher Center at no cost. • He explained that Mr. Oliver has offered a location in Mason Square in Oswego to the Senior Services Associates. If Senior Services Associates moves to Oswego, Yorkville looses a service for its residents; the seniors can still use Senior Services Associates however they will have to drive to Oswego. • Parents are complaining that they have to drive another quarter mile for recreation programs however if Senior Services Associates moves its whole program out of town the seniors will be driving further. He stated that the City should be trying to maintain all existing programs in the community. This will be an inconvenience for a lot of people for awhile but this solution is in an effort to try and save an importance community service. • In reference to the comment that this move was not discussed by the City Council, he stated that he asked the City Council if the Senior Services Associates could use the Beecher Center. He stated that at the time not a lot of the details were known but as they developed they were brought to the City Council. • The agreement with Senior Services Associates indicates that they will work with the City to allow use in the building when they are not occupying it in an effort to maximize the use of the building. With cooperation on both sides, the building will be used in a way that benefits everyone. • He encouraged everyone to proceed on finding a permanent location for Senior Services Associates. Alderman Spears noted that earlier in the meeting Del Webb presented a senior- targeted community and everyone is "jumping for joy "; everyone, except Alderman Leslie who she commented may have been sleeping, however the City Council is neglecting to serve the seniors who created the community that has attracted Del Webb. She asked that if Senior Services Associates is eliminated, would the senior nutrition program be next. Alderman Spears noted that a concession stand was built at the Beecher Center however she does not see seniors buying soda and hot dogs. She stated that this was clearly not for them but was an investment geared toward another "population ". She stated that Senior Services Associates provides free legal services to senior citizens along with many other programs and that she would hate to see seniors travel to Sandwich, Oswego or Plano. She commented that she did not feel that this was something Yorkville can afford to give up. She reiterated that this is a temporary solution. Also, she stated that this group should be complimented because they are willing to be cramped into the Beecher Center just so they can continue their socialization and programs. She recommended that some of the City Council visit the facility in the next month to see what they are addressing. She stated that the seniors need to find a place and that the City Council needs to provide a place for them because the senior citizens have paid their taxes and deserve it. She asked the members of the City Council who are "on the fence" about this agreement to "jump ofF and think about their own parents and grandparents. She asked if they would like to see them displaced. She stated that if children are told they are going to a different location for classes, they probably wouldn't care. She asked the City Council to work with these people, work for these people, be for the people who have elected them. Alderman Spears also noted that she has received many calls and she has met with many of the people in attendance tonight. She asked many to speak out but she was told they did not want to "cause waves" or "I don't want to have repercussions ". The seniors continually sit back and "take it'. She noted that these are people who have gone through the Depression, they have gone through many things and this is forgotten. She noted that they are in attendance tonight because they want to be part of the community. She asked the City Council to support their relocation to the Beecher Center; a building they obtained. Alderman Munns noted that Mr. Oliver's redevelopment of Countryside Center is a good think for Yorkville; it will provide new tax dollars. He stated that this is helping all of Yorkville and the seniors have to go somewhere. He stated that he is a veteran and he was sure some World War Il veterans use the services and this is a population that has been underserved. He stated that retired veterans can get information right here in Yorkville at the Senior Services Associates. Alderman James commented that he did not want the seniors to leave Yorkville but he wanted to see them find a suitable location. He stated that he has asked if they pursued looking at using the American Legion and was told they did not investigate this. He noted that the building is The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — September 13. 2005 — uage 8 empty Monday through Friday and probably does not need to be modified. He was concerned that this was discounted. He stated that his other concern is that the Senior Services Associates are not willing to make any concession and they have specified particulars that they want in the agreement. Alderman Leslie commented that he appreciated Alderman Spears passion however he encouraged her not to " demonize" any individuals, him specifically. He stated that he is trying to make the right decision. He noted that he spent most of his day over at the Beecher Center speaking with the Golden Diners so he asked Alderman Spears not to challenge his empathy towards the seniors. He stated that the City Council is dealing with a private association that provides a great service for the community however it is a private organization using a City building. He stated that he heard from four individuals today explaining how the Park & Recreation programs won't work with the change. He commented that two issues trouble him; the private land issue of the TIF and that he has not heard from anyone in the Parks & Recreation Department regarding the relocation. He stated that the Parks & Recreation Department have concerns but do not feel free to discuss them and that he would like to hear from the people in charge of the programs being displaced by the seniors. Police Chief Martin asked to address the City Council. He commented that the Police Department has made a concerted effort to work closely with the seniors for years; some officers have even gone through special training to work with senior citizens. He stated that this is something he is proud of and enjoys. He noted that if the seniors are displaced it will free up more time for these officers however it takes away from the importance of working with them and he would like to continue to see this interaction. He reminded the Council that senior citizens will soon be more populous group in the community as well as the country. He expressed his opinion that the City has to take care of its seniors because it would be hurting the City to displace them. He commented that he knows it is a difficult decision and he asked the City Council to take into consideration that the seniors are the people that they will be in a few years. Executive Director of Parks & Recreation Laura Brown commented that this is a policy question that the City Council needs to make. She staged that the relocation is not an ideal situation but the Recreation Department will use whatever resources they are given. She noted that the Park Board has expressed their concerns with the situation because they are looking out for these programs. Mayor Prochaska stated that he is taking full responsibility for this situation because he invited Senior Services Associates to stay in Yorkville. He explained that many other locations were looked at, even the American Legion. He further explained that not only is a large meeting area needed but also offices for confidential meetings. He also explained that the cost factor at other locations made it impractical for either the Senior Services Associates or the City. The Beecher space is not ideal but will work for the Senior Services Associates and the Castle Bank room is larger for recreation programs. He thought everyone could work together to make this work. Alderman Besco asked the City Council if any of them had reviewed the proposed plans for the Beecher Center which he first saw tonight. The other members of the Council indicated they had not seen the plans. ➢ Based on this, Alderman Besco made a motion to postpone the vote until the September 27, 2005 City Council meeting; seconded by Alderman Ohare. Motion defeated by a roll call vote. Ayes -4 Nays -5 Burd -nay, James -aye, Leslie -nay, Munns -nay, Ohare -aye, Spears -nay, Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye, Prochaska -nay Alderman Burd pointed out that Alderman Leslie stated that the City Council is deciding between two entities. She stated that she felt this is only true if the Council turns down the use of the Beecher Center by the Senior Services Associates because it is a definite vote no for the seniors. If the vote is to allow the seniors to use the space, the Council is not saying no to any programs because both the Recreation Department and the seniors programs will continue. If the vote is no for the eement the Senior Services Associates will leave Yorkville and the message being sent � � g is that the Council does not care enough for what they are providing the community to work with them for a short term. She stated that she did not see how this temporary fix where everyone will get to use a facility was a bad situation. She pointed out that the Mayor Prochaska has been involved in the pursuit of a location and the Council has trusted him before on other issues. She stated that she was surprised that some of the Council who have been his supporters were turning their back on what he is saying. She stated that Mayor Prochaska, Alderman Spears and she have a history on the Council and have been here a long time serving the community. She hoped the other Council members would give them some credibility. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — September 13. 2005 — page 9 Alderman Leslie asked if there was an opportunity to make a motion to amend the five -year term of the agreement. Mayor Prochaska reread the motion on the floor: to approve the revised Senior Facility Use Agreement as presented and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement subject to legal review and approval by Senior Services Associates. Attorney Wyeth clarified that the main motion currently on the floor could be amended. ➢ A motion was made by Alderman Ohare to amend the agreement to a two -year term; seconded by Alderman Wolfer. Alderman Munns asked if the agreement would be amended to two -years with the same sixty -day out clause. Alderman Ohare clarified that the sixty -day clause would remain. Alderman Leslie commented that by making it a two year agreement, it will have to be reviewed. Mayor Prochaska noted that the contract could be reviewed at anytime as it stands now. Alderman Leslie stated that with the two year term it "must" be reviewed; he was asking for an obligation to review it in two years. Mayor Prochaska stated that motion needed to be clarified. Alderman Wolfer withdrew his second and Alderman Ohare withdrew the motion. ➢ A motion was made by Alderman Ohare to amend the agreement to a two -year term, to be reviewed at that time and with the sixty day out clause; seconded by Alderman James. Alderman Burd asked how the funds being spent will be handled. Attorney Wyeth explained that the funds will be prorated to two years. Mayor Prochaska stated that the five year provision was because Senior Services Associates has issues with their grant that is being used to upgrade the building. He stated that Senior Services Associates may not be able to accept the agreement because it puts them in violation of the grant terms. Alderman Leslie stated that the spirit of what is trying to be done is to find a home for the Senior Services Associates; they will have two years. Mayor Prochaska stated that the community it planning a senior center; it is in the City's facility plan. He reiterated what he said earlier in the discussion; the City is currently working to get a facility however it may not happen in two years. He stated that he is hearing distrust that this won't happen. Alderman Leslie commented that by putting a two -year limit on this puts a fire under the City Council to get this accomplished. Mayor Prochaska countered that the contract currently reads that in that five -year time there is an option to have Senior Services Associates move to another location. ➢ A motion was made by Alderman Besco to terminate debate and have a vote on the motion to amend the agreement; seconded by Alderman Ohare. Attorney Wyeth noted that six aye votes were needed to close the debate. Motion defeated by a roll call vote. Ayes -5 Nays -3 Leslie -aye, Munns -nay, Ohare -aye, Spears -nay, Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -nay, James -aye Alderman Spears explained that she did not agree with a two -year term because she didn't feel Senior Services Associates would be satisfied with this. She stated that she has been on the City Council long enough to know that a shorter term will not put a fire under the City; this Council does not move quickly on anything. She stated that this could drag out for twenty years. She commented that she did not feel that Mr. Oliver was going to put a lot of investment into a facility for a two -year period. She felt he would loose so it would be better relocating Senior Services Associates to Mason Square in Oswego. She stated that he has been cooperating with the City trying to please these people. She stated she would like to believe that it is not a financial thing for him but rather it is coming from his heart; he is a great supporter of senior citizens. She stated that changing the contract to a two -year term was ridiculous and she would almost encourage the Senior Services Associates to move to Mason Square. She stated she would be sorry to see them go and she was song that the City will not support its senior. Alderman Leslie and Besco told Alderman Spears that this was not fair. She retorted that it was fair. She stated that the agreement could be kept at five years and the City could look for another location. She asked why those commenting that there are other locations available aren't out there pursing them. She asked why it was only up to certain people, like the Mayor, herself or the Senior Ad Hoc Committee, to find a facility. She stated that the City Council could talk about all the faults however everyone is trying to work together. Alderman Spears asked that the seniors be given some sense of security so they did not feel displaced like the hurricane Katrina victims. She asked how these victims would feel if they were The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — September 13. 2005 — pa 10 told they could come to Illinois however in three months they were out and on their own because it is not beneficial to Illinois for them to stay and take jobs away from residents or find a comfortable community to live in. She stated that after this vote, if it is opposed, she would guarantee any senior would change their mind if they were thinking they have found peace of mind in Yorkville. She stated she would not feel comfortable retiring in Yorkville. Alderman Burd asked for clarification on the Senior Services Associates' grant. She asked if they needed a location for five years to receive the funding. Mayor Prochaska asked Mrs. Austin to clarify this and she explained that the five years has to do with the lease. Mr. Oliver expanded on this by explaining that the grant is tied into the Senior Services Associates having a lease and they had five years left on the lease for the Countryside location. Mr. Oliver explained that other locations were investigated but they proved unsuitable for use by the Senior Services Associates. He apologized for putting the City Council in the middle of this; he did not like to see the adversarial position. He suggested that the City Council postpone the vote on the agreement for a few weeks so that everyone could calm down and get all the information. He commented that Yorkville does not need this from the City Council; the City is moving in the right direction with great Council members, seniors, schools, etc. He asked that Yorkville be left in the direction it is moving. Alderman Wolfer asked Mr. Oliver why Castle Bank was not a good location. Mr. Oliver explained that it was offered to the Senior Services Associates and they had concern with the two ingress /egresses with stairs. Senior Services Associates felt it would be too dangerous to be in the basement even though he offered to add a sprinkler system and an elevator. He noted it would be more economical for him to renovate the Castle Bank building than the Beecher Center. It was asked if a back up generator was considered and he stated that this could be considered. Mr. Oliver went on to explain that a location in the industrial park was investigated however he did not want to put a senior facility in an industrial park because it made him feel like he was relocating them to a garage. He reiterated that the Beecher Center is not a permanent solution. He stated that he never said he would build a new building but he has had discussions with the Mayor about a joint venture with the City to build a community center but this cannot be built in thirty to sixty days. Alderman Wolfer asked if Mr. Oliver was adding sprinklers to the Castle Building for the Recreation Department. W. Oliver stated that this would be done; the water main has already been run for this. Alderman Spear reiterated that Mr. Oliver was installing an elevator and maybe a backup generator in the event of a disaster which is good. She asked how many people with walkers could fit in an elevator at one time if they needed to escape. Alderman Munns asked if the question could be called because everyone has had information for six months and this should move on. Mayor Prochaska noted that this motion was made earlier and defeated. Mr. Oliver again asked that the City Council postpone the vote, take the emotions off the table, review all the information and then make their decision. Alderman Besco agreed Mayor Prochaska clarified that that there were two motions on the floor, one for the agreement and the other to amend it. He reminded the Council that there was a motion to postpone the vote which was defeated. He explained that to redo the motion to postpone, one of the aldermen who voted nay would have to make the motion to reconsider. Alderman Besco commented that tonight was the first time he saw the plans for the Beecher renovation. He stated that he could have changed his mind if the plans had come to him earlier. He had questions regarding the offices that are in the plans. He asked if the offices that they are planning to construct are temporary so when the Senior Services Associates moves out, the facility could still be used as it was prior to Senior Services Associates moving in. He stated he would like to see revision made to the plans. He stated that he did not want to see Senior Services Associates leave Yorkville but he did want to see Countryside gone and redeveloped because it is an economic incentive for the City. He felt that the City, the seniors and the developer have been put into a bad situation. He stated that none of the City Council are against seniors; they all have parents, grandparents, etc. and it was wrong to say that the seniors are being told to leave the community. He noted that he wasn't elected just by seniors but rather the whole community. He acknowledged that seniors make a community strong and he wanted to work something out. He agreed with Mr. Oliver that the vote should be postponed. Mr. Oliver stated he was willing to make a presentation of the plans to the City Council at any time. Alderman Wolfer stated that he would appreciate this. Mayor Prochaska stated that if this was going to be done, he wanted recommendations from staff as to the plan. He took The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — September 13. 2005 — pa 11 responsibility for the City Council not receiving the proper information and he stated that he tried to keep people informed as well as he could however the dynamics of this situation happened quickly. Alderman James asked Mr. Oliver that if this agreement is not approved would it impact the redevelopment of Countryside and Mr. Oliver stated it would. Mayor Prochaska again reminded the City Council that the motion on the floor was to amend the contract to a two -year term. Alderman James withdrew is second to this motion. Mayor Prochaska and Attorney Wyeth clarified that the motion dies for a lack of a second. Mayor Prochaska stated that there was still a motion on the floor, the motion to approve the revised Senior Facility Use Agreement as presented and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement subject to legal review and approval by Senior Services Associates. ➢ A motion was made by Alderman Wolfer to postpone the vote for two weeks in order to get more information and bring it back to the Council for a vote. It was discussed if Alderman Wolfer could make this motion and it was clarified that he voted aye to the first vote to postpone. Mayor Prochaska clarified that to reconsider the motion to postpone, it would have to be brought up by Aldermen Burd, Leslie, Munns or Spears. Alderman Leslie expressed his concern that if he made the motion to reconsider postponing the vote for two weeks he would be shutting the seniors out. Alderman Munns stated that postponing the vote gives the seniors two more weeks of stress. Alderman Leslie asked Mr. Oliver if postponing the vote would interfere in the dynamics of the situation and Mr. Oliver stated it would not. A motion was made by Alderman Leslie to reconsider postponing the vote until September 27, 2005; seconded by Alderman Wolfer. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -5 Nays -3 Munns -nay, Ohare -aye, Spears -nay, Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -nay, James -aye, Leslie -aye Coffee with the Mayor Mayor Prochaska reported that the next Coffee with the Mayor would be held on September 17, 2005 at Raintree Village, 461 Hazeltine Way, from 10:00 a.m. to noon. CITY COUNCIL REPORT No report. ATTORNEY'S REPORT Robert's Rules 101 Attorney Wyeth postponed his report on the Robert's Rules until the next City Council meeting. CITY CLERK'S REPORT Aldermen Burd and Besco momentarily stepped out of the meeting. MFT Audit ##56 for 1 /1 /04 — 12/31/04 City Clerk Milschewski reported that she received Audit Report No. 56 from the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) which covered the receipt and disbursement of Motor Fuel Tax (MF°T) for the period of January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004. The net balance of NET funds as of December 31, 2004 was $370,247.99. Clerk Milschewski requested a motion to _ accept the IDOT Audit Report No. 56 as presented. So moved by Alderman James; seconded by Alderman Wolfer. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -6 Nays -0 Munns -aye, Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye Attorney Wyeth and Administrator Graff noted that the full Council should be present for vote under the Treasurer's Report so the City Administrator's Report was moved up on the agenda. CITY ADNIINISTATOR'S REPORT, Administrator Graff reported that he placed his letter of resignation in the City Council's mail boxes after he tendered it to Mayor Prochaska. His last day with the City will be September 27, 2005. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — Sentember 13.2005 — Mee 12 Alderman Wolfer stated that he was sorry to hear that Administrator Graff had resigned and he wished him good luck. Mayor Prochaska commented that it is with regret that he has accepted the resignation. He stated that Administrator Graff has served Yorkville well as both Police Chief and as City Administrator. He stated that he has brought a lot to the community by expanding and advancing both the Police Department and administrative staff through education programs and expanding staff to include positions such as the Finance Director. He stated that he felt comfortable having Mr. Graff working on day-to-day dealings with everything from sewer interceptors to IDOT meetings. He stated that Administrator Graff will be missed and he wished him well in his future endeavors. CITY TREASURER'S REPORT Ordinance 2005 -75 Authorizing the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source) Series 2005 Rob Roy Creek Interceptor Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to approve an ordinance authorizing the issuance of General Obligation Bonds (Alternate Revenue Source) Series 2005 in the amount not to exceed $12,000,000.00 for the Rob Roy Creek Interceptor. So moved by Alderman James; seconded by Alderman Leslie. Finance Director Pleckham noted that the City Council received a red -line and a clean copy of the ordinance and that the clean-up issue was to identifying a revenue source. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James-aye, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye FINANCE DIRECTOR'S REPORT, No report. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT, No report. CHIEF OF POLICE REPORT Hurricane Katrina Police Chief Martin reported that Sergeant Hart has been working 14 to 20 hour days in New Orleans helping the victims of hurricane Katrina. When he returns, Lieutenant Schwartzkopf will probably head down to help. Online Disaster Test Mayor Prochaska asked Chief Martin about the online NIMS test. Chief Martin reminded the Council to go online to take a test in order for the City to become NIMS compliant which will help the City obtain grants. He explained that the test takes about one to two hours to take online. He stated he would get the website information to the City Council. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION REPORT, No report. COMMUNITY & LIAISON REPORT Midwest Literary Festival Alderman Burd reported that she attended the Midwest Literary Festival in Aurora and that it was a wonderful event. She stated that there were writing workshops and authors were available for people to meet. Mayor Prochaska stated that he and Rita Feltes from the Yorkville Public Library _ also attended and read stories with a grandparent theme. They also did projects with the children. He also noted it was a successful event. Polka Party Mayor Prochaska reported that he and Alderman Spears attended the Polka Party for seniors at the Beecher Center. He stated that it was a great event with a good turn out with over 150 people in attendance with attendees from as far away as Wisconsin and Ohio. Alderman Spears added that the entertainment asked how many people were from Yorkville and there were ten in attendance. She stated that people were asking if this could be an annual event. COMMITTEE REPORTS PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT No report. The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — September 13, 2005 — ua 13 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, Resolution 2005 -59 Approving the Final Plat of Subdivision for Bristol Bay Units 1 -7 A motion was made by Alderman Munns to approve a resolution approving the Final Plat of Subdivision for Bristol Bay Units 1 -7 as presented; seconded by Alderman Ohare. Alderman Spears questioned if this was the SSA that the City Council discussed and Mayor Prochaska clarified that the motion was to approve the plat and not an SSA. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -1 Ohare -aye, Spears -nay, Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye Resolution 2005 -60 Approving the Final Plat of Subdivision for Autumn Creek Unit 1 A motion was made by Alderman Munns to approve a resolution approving the Final Plat of Subdivision for Autumn Creek Unit 1 as presented; seconded by Alderman Ohare. Alderman Spears questioned if this development has an SSA and Mayor Prochaska stated that it did. He reminded the City Council that they are voting that the final plat substantially meets the preliminary plat. Alderman Spears asked if the City Council had already voted on the portion that includes the SSA. Administrator Graff noted that SSA bonds have not been approved yet however the intent has been approved. Alderman Spears clarified that if she voted in favor of this was she approving the SSA and both Mayor Prochaska and Administrator Graff stated no and reiterated that approval of this resolution is approving that the final plat substantially meets the preliminary plat. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Munn -aye, Ohare -aye Resolution 2005 -61 Approving the Preliminary/Final Plat of Subdivision for XPAC Property A motion was made by Alderman Munns to approve a resolution approving the Preliminary/Final Plat of Subdivision for XPAC Property as presented; seconded by Alderman Besco. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye, Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Development Agreement and Rezoning — Dearborn Property 201 So. Main Street and 204 Hydraulic Avenue Attorney Bob Pihner addressed the City Council and explained that a question was raised at the Committee of the Whole meeting last week about the effect of the TIF District on this property. He stated that he has not had a chance to speak with Attorney Wyeth regarding this so he was asking the City Council to postpone consideration of this matter for two weeks until the issues can be resolved. A motion was made by Alderman Burd to postpone the approval of the Development Agreement and Rezoning for Robert and Debra Dearbom for 201 South Main Street and 204 Hydraulic Avenue until the September 27, 2005 City Council meeting; seconded by Alderman Wolfer. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye, Ohare -aye PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT, Purchase of Chevy Tahoe A motion was made by Alderman Ohare to approve the purchase of a Chevy Tahoe in an amount not to exceed $28,709.00 subject to the funding recommendation as presented within the memorandum by Finance Director Traci Pleckham dated September 12, 2005; seconded by Alderman Wolfer. Finance Director Pleckham explained that she investigated how many building permits would be needed to recoup the funds in the Capital Fund in order to obtain this vehicle. She state that if the building permits don't materialize, she is recommending that the Contingency Fund or the Fund Balance be used. Mayor Prochaska clarified that the budget would support this purchase if the The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Citv Council — Seutember 13.2005 — ua 14 building permits are not obtained. He noted that he did not mind Contingency Funds being used however he had an issue using the Fund Balance. Administrator Graff noted that staff is concerned with the increase in gas prices and Contingency Funds may be needed to offset this cost. Director Pleckham stated this would be determined at audit time. Alderman Burd asked that in the future the Finance Director notify the department head whose fund is in this condition. Mayor Prochaska started that a procedure is being developed to address -- this. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -7 Nays -1 Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -nay, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye, Ohare -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT, No report. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS None. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to go into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing the appointment, employment, compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of specific employees of the public body or legal counsel for the public body, including hearing testimony on a complaint lodged against an employee of the public body or against legal counsel for the public body to determine its validity. So moved by Alderman Besco; seconded by Alderman Wolfer. He asked that the City Clerk, City Attorney and City Administrator be included in the session. He noted that no action would be taken after the session. Motion approved by a roll call vote. Ayes -8 Nays -0 Ohare -aye, Besco -aye, Burd -aye, James -aye, Leslie -aye, Munns -aye, Spears -aye, Wolfer -aye The City Council entered into executive session at 10:27 p.m. The City Council returned to returned to regular session at 10:38 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Prochaska entertained a motion to adjourn. So moved by Alderman Besco; seconded by Alderman Wolfer. Motion approved by a viva voce vote. Meeting adjourned at 10:39 P.M. Minutes submitted by: Jacquelyn Milschewski, City Clerk City of Yorkville, Illinois CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 13, 2005 PLEASE PRINT NAME: ADDRESS: f/ ��� �.l�Vll L/l �d�C [J GrdJ� KIWI Kq�K � Pow cL L W /oLJ Spf � s �u+ttv►1n Fos Pn win.11e 1 B IOS uJovr.�WorJ -G, St Yo�Kur' /l q 05 - ✓�tXrd' ✓eJ� �P-o oA /GG -Ti-- Z,6V S Pr 3t � v 1 307(o G��le►.a G��k 6�Ia SIGNIN ILI V\ V\N- 61101w i CITY COUNCIL MEETING September 13, 2005 PLEASE PRINT ADDRESS: A c � c c/us k 632- IUlrk�ll y l � d ' y qlo( --ko UGF5 a SIGNIN ' I �� Q�vvw- Z d y �►� ?(r.�es� �e . ��lwy�l l.� �el F �� �` Abe rt /o7 9i C /,,7 e i �S �d� �r� rtC9 �� �� 1 D ?6\�- BVA-yo l CITY COUNCIL MEETING UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS REPORT OF PROCEEDINGS had at the meeting i of the above - entitled matter taken before CHRISTINE M. VITOSH, C.S.R., R.P.R., on I September 13, 2005, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., at 800 Game Farm Road in the City of Yorkville, Illinois. I �I i I D- 771305 REPO • COURT reporting service 800 West Fifth Avenue • Suite 203C • Naperville, IL 60563 • 630 - 983 -0030 • Fax 630 - 983 -6013 www.depocoui,t.com i 2 1 P R E S E N T: 2 MR. ARTHUR F. PROCHASKA, Mayor; i 3 MR. PAUL JAMES, Alderman; 4 MR. JASON LESLIE, Alderman; 5 MS. VALERIE BURD, Alderman; i 6 MR. DEAN WOLFER, Alderman; I 7 MR. MARTY MUNNS, Alderman; 8 MS. WANDA OHARE, Alderman; j jl 9 MR. JOSEPH BESCO, Alderman; 10 MS. ROSE ANN SPEARS, Alderwoman; 11 MR. TONY GRAFF, City Administrator; i i 12 MS. JACQUELYN MILSCHEWSKI, City Clerk. i 13 14 A P P E A R A N C E S: 15 WYETH, HEITZ & BROMBEREK 300 East Fifth Avenue, Suite 380 16 Naperville, Illinois 60563 BY: MR. JOHN JUSTIN WYETH, 17 appeared on behalf of the United City of Yorkville, Illinois. 18 I 19 - - - - - 20 21 22 23 24 Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 3 1 (Pledge of Allegiance) 2 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Next we have on I 3 the agenda two public hearings. At this time I 4 would entertain a motion to go into public 5 hearing for -- The first one would be for the 6 Yorkville - Bristol Sanitary District, petitioners, 7 request to annex to the United City of Yorkville 4 8 and rezone from Kendall County A -1 Agricultural 9 to United City of Yorkville A -1 Agricultural k i 10 District with a special use for a water treatment 11 facility and for hearing as to the annexation 12 agreement of the petitioner. 13 The real property consists of 14 approximately 20.375 acres directly west of the 15 existing Yorkville - Bristol Sanitary District 16 property, Bristol Township, Kendall County, 17 Illinois. 18 MS. OHARE: So moved. I 19 MR. BESCO: Second. 1 j 20 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Moved and f 21 seconded. May I have roll call, please? 22 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Besco. 23 MR. BESCO: Aye. 24 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Burd. I Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 4 1 MS. BURD: Aye. 2 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: James. 3 MS. JAMES: Aye. 4 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Leslie. 5 MR. LESLIE: Aye. 6 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Munns. 7 MR. MUNNS: Aye. 8 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Ohare. d 9 MS. OHARE: Aye. 10 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Spears. 11 MS. SPEARS: Aye. I i 12 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Wolfer. I 13 MR. WOLFER: Aye. 14 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Motion is carried. ' 15 We are now in public hearing. Is there anybody 16 that would like to make any presentation? Do you 17 want to talk about this at all? 18 MR. WYETH: Mr. Fister is here. 19 MR. FISTER: I defer to our 20 attorney. 21 WHEREUPON: 22 GREGG INGEMUNSON, 23 testified before the Yorkville City Council as 24 follows: Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 5 1 MR. INGEMUNSON: Fairly straight 2 forward annexation. The District has owned this 3 property for quite some time. It's 20 acres 4 immediately west of their current existing 5 treatment facility. It's immediately adjacent to 6 the property. 7 We just felt at this time it 8 was prudent to get it within the City limits for I 9 future -- we have no plans for any expansion in r. 10 the future, but down the road if the community 11 does call for an expansion to serve the community 12 with future sewer needs, this 20 acres is going 4 f I 13 to be able to serve that existing and future 14 needs of the village and the city, and it's a 15 straight annexation. 16 We are just seeking for the 17 zoning classification to mirror the current 18 zoning classification for our current property. 19 With that, I can answer any 20 uestions if anyone has an questions. q Y Y q I 21 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Is there anyone in 22 the audience that would like to cross - examine the 23 attorney for the Sanitary District or have any 24 other comments or questions? Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 6 1 (No Response) 2 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Hearing none, is 3 there anyone on the City Council that has any 4 comments or questions? i 5 (No Response) 6 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Okay. Then thank 7 you very much. 8 MR. INGEMUNSON: Thank you. 9 MAYOR PROCHASKA: At this time I f e 10 would entertain a motion to close the public 11 hearing. 12 MS. SPEARS: So moved. 13 MS. BURD: Second. 14 MS. OHARE: Second. 15 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Moved and 16 seconded. May I have roll call, please? 17 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Burd. 18 MS. BURD: Aye. 19 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: James. 20 MR. JAMES: Aye. 21 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Leslie. 22 MR. LESLIE: Aye. I 23 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Munns. i 24 MR. MUNNS: Aye. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 7 1 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Ohare. 2 MS. OHARE: Aye. 3 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Spears. IC I 4 MS. SPEARS: Aye. V 5 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Wolfer. 6 MR. WOLFER: Aye. v i 7 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Besco. 8 MR. BESCO: Aye. I 9 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Motion is carried. 10 Next we have on the agenda a 11 public hearing for the purpose of hearing from 12 Pulte Home Corporation, MPLIVIO, LLC, MPLIV20, I 13 LLC, and MLH Yorkville, LLC, petitioners, request i 14 to annex to the United City of Yorkville and 15 rezone from Kendall County A -1 Agricultural to 16 the United City of Yorkville Planned Unit 17 Development consisting of R -2 One - Family 18 Residence District, R -3 General Residence 19 District, and B -3 Service Business District, and 20 for hearing as to the annexation and planned unit 21 development agreement of petitioner. 22 The real property consists of 23 approximately 587 acres at the northwest corner �I a 24 of Galena and Route 47, Bristol Township, Kendall Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 8 1 County, Illinois. 2 Is there anyone that would like 3 to speak for the petitioner? I 4 MS. OHARE: So moved. 5 MS. SPEARS: Second. 6 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Moved and t 7 seconded. May I have roll call, please? 8 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Besco. 9 MR. BESCO: Aye. 10 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Burd. 11 MS. BURD: Aye. i 12 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: James. I 13 MR. JAMES: Aye. 14 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Leslie. 15 MR. LESLIE: Aye. 16 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Munns. 17 MR. MUNNS: Aye. 18 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Ohare. t 19 MS. OHARE: Aye. 20 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Spears. 21 MS. SPEARS: Aye. I 22 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Wolfer. 23 MR. WOLFER: Aye. 24 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Motion is carried. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 9 1 Now, if someone would like to speak. 2 WHEREUPON: 3 CHARLES L. BYRUM, 4 testified before the Yorkville City Council as 5 follows: 6 MR. BYRUM: Thank you. My name is 7 Chuck Byrum. I am a lawyer with the firm of i 8 Gardner, Carton & Douglas, and we represent Pulte I 9 Home Corporation and Del Webb Corporation. They q 10 are the contract purchasers for the residential j 8 11 portion of this property. 12 This is a public hearing, and I i 13 do have four witnesses who might -- two will give I i 14 testimony for sure, and two might, so I don't -- 15 is it the custom to swear them all now or 16 individually? 17 MAYOR PROCHASKA: At the City 18 Council, it's been our custom that as long as we i 19 have the court reporter and they are -- they 20 realize they are in a public meeting, we do not 21 do additional swearing. t 22 MR. WYETH: If you would like to I 23 have them sworn in, though, Counsel, that's 'I I 24 fine. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 10 1 MR. BYRUM: That's fine. 2 MR. WYETH: Fair enough. 3 MR. BYRUM: The Mayor has identified G. 4 the property, has identified the ownership. It 4' 5 is owned right now by three limited liability 6 companies. 7 The property is going to be -- 8 We are seeking to have the property annexed. We 9 are seeking to have it zoned into three 10 categories. 11 The first will be R -2 12 single- family residential, and that will be 1 I 13 conventional zoning, and that will be developed. 1, 14 That would be a community that would be developed N 15 by Pulte Home Corporation as conventional i 16 housing. 17 There will be an R -3 Planned 18 Unit Development District, and that will be i 19 developed by Del Webb as an age - restricted 20 residential community, and we are seeking PUD 21 approval on that one, and then there is a B -3 22 commercial district for the balance of the 23 property. That's approximately 30 acres. 24 We have appeared before the Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 11 1 Plan Commission, and pursuant to public hearings, 2 the Plan Commission has approved and recommended t 3 the annexation of the property, the zoning of the i 4 property, and we hope to conclude the process 5 tomorrow night with the plan development approval 6 for the R -3 portion. 7 So tonight's hearing is a 8 public hearing on the annexation agreement, and I ` 9 realize other items will be discussed, but I -- 10 for the record, we have submitted a draft 11 - annexation agreement for the property. It bears 12 the draft date 8- 26 -05. r 13 If it looks familiar to you, 14 it's because it's largely the Autumn Creek 15 annexation agreement that we recently received 16 approval or recently executed with the City, but 17 I think that -- and we will be here to entertain 18 any public comment on the annexation agreement i 19 and answer any questions you may have on the 20 annexation agreement, but I think you are also 21 very interested in what we specifically have 22 intended and planned for the development of the 23 property and what the plans will look like, and j 24 that's where I'd like to go in our testimony Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 12 1 right now. 2 We do have Matt Cudney, who 3 represents Pulte and Del Webb, and Phil 'I 4 Stuepfert, from SEC Planning, our planner, who 5 are going to talk to you a little bit about this, 6 and then we do have our engineers here from Smith 7 Engineering to answer any questions, but we don't 8 plan on direct testimony from them. E 9 So with that, what I would like j 10 to do is turn it over to Matt to talk a little 11 bit about our land uses. Matt? i 12 MR. STUEPFERT: Actually it's Phil. 13 MR. BYRUM: Phil, excuse me. j 14 WHEREUPON: 15 PHIL STUEPFERT, 16 testified before the Yorkville City Council as 17 follows: 18 MR. STUEPFERT: Phil Stuepfert with h 19 SEC Planning. And, first of all, good evening, P 20 and it's a pleasure to be here to talk about this 21 project. 22 It's an exciting project and 23 it's a very neat project, and you are going to 24 hear us use that word "neat" very much with this Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 13 1 project, because it is. It's a neat buyer, 2 special buyer. 3 And we currently have six or 1 4 seven projects for Del Webb across the country, 5 and in terms of site planning and some of the 6 products that we use, we're doing the same thing E 7 with this Yorkville project as we are across the i 8 country. 9 There's certain things that we j 10 are doing specific to the buyer and buyer needs. 11 You know, some of the things like the quality, 12 community, zoning, Del Webb's reputation is very j 1 13 good. All of those things play into this 14 project. It's a very strong community. Matt i 15 will probably talk about some of this as well. 16 But the buyer is very unique, - f 17 and they are looking for certain things in a 18 community, so that's why some of the site 19 planning standards that we are using, the way 20 the site plan is set up, is specific to this 21 buyer. i 22 You are going to hear us talk 23 about some of the variances that we are asking 24 for. Those variances are specific to the buyer's Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 14 1 needs and the buyer's wants. 2 Before I get into some of that, 3 there are many things that we are in compliance 4 with. First of all, the Comprehensive Plan for 5 this property shows commercial down on the 6 southeast corner, and then it shows a 7 transitional use and then going to suburban i 8 neighborhood. We are very much in compliance 9 with that. ' 10 Our overall gross density is 11 3.17 units per acre, and that is -- I believe in 12 the comments he said that's very consistent with j 13 the Comprehensive Plan. 14 In terms of the zoning, I 15 believe you have this exhibit in your packets. 16 It shows some of the adjacent properties. 17 We have the Bristol Bay project 18 by Centex over in this area, and you can see that i 19 there are B -3 zoning along 47. We are very 20 consistent with our B -3 zoning across from that. 21 The West Grade Village to the l 22 south of us, that is B -3 zoning in here, which is I 23 across from our B -3 zoning, and we have 24 residential across from our residential. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 15 1 Here is the Bay Meadows 2 project, and I believe it's in the concept stage, 3 commercial and single- family detached. j 4 So we feel like we are fitting I 5 in very well with the surrounding communities and p 6 consistent from the zoning standpoint. 7 Some of the things -- and I'll E 8 just pull up the plan here real quick. In terms 9 of the site plan, I was mentioning that -- you 10 know, all the other projects we are doing around 11 the country, there are certain things that we do 12 in a Del Webb concept, and some of the items, { 13 like a dramatic entry and the water on both sides 14 of the entry, will add very unique presentation i 15 and a very strong community. We do that on all 16 of our communities around the country. 17 And one of the things you will 18 notice, this boulevard or this control and this 19 loop road, you will see there is no lots loaded i 20 on that type of track. 21 That's very intentional, so as 22 you drive through these communities, they have a 23 very nice feel. 24 If anybody has been through Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 16 1 the Huntley project, it's a very pleasing 2 appearance as you drive through, so it's very i I 3 intentional. Some of the lakes and the amenity 4 centers are, again, very intentional. 5 It's set up, as you can see, i 6 with different distinct enclaves throughout the 7 development, with one primary entry and then a 8 secondary access for emergency purposes. �j 9 Again, that's very -- we like j 10 to have each project very specific for the 11 different buyers that come in there. 12 Some of the -- I won't go too 13 much into detail in the plan, but you'll see that 14 there are buffers along some of these areas, 15 berming and landscaping along 47 and along Galena 16 in those areas, so, again, everywhere you drive 17 around this project, I think this is a great 18 entryway into Yorkville as you come down south. 19 I mean, we are going to have 20 very nice landscaping, the water is an 21 impressive entry. Much like if you have seen 22 the Huntley project along 47, it has a very 23 distinct presence. You can't help but look over 24 there. We see some of the same things in this Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 17 1 proj ect . 2 So those are some of the things 3 that we feel like we're doing that is very 4 consistent with the Comp Plan, and we have a very 5 strong project that way. f 6 Now, with some of the buyer 7 needs of wanting smaller lots and less 8 maintenance and things like that, we are asking 9 for some smaller lot sizes and some smaller i 10 setbacks, which is not typical for a lot of 11 developments around Yorkville. 12 Some of the justification for 13 that is, as I mentioned, the buyer doesn't want 14 all that yard to maintain, doesn't want to 1 15 maintain all the yard, don't want to maintain all 16 that landscaping. 17 They are looking for a 18 lifestyle community. They are not looking for a 19 big yard to let their kids run, they don't have 20 kids obviously, so they are looking for very 21 specific things, a lifestyle community with I 22 amenities in it. 23 Secondly, some of the 24 reductions that we are asking for in terms of lot Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 18 1 sizes and setbacks, hopefully you are not too 2 concerned with that because the lots of these are 3 ranch homes, and that's very key. 4 If you are in a development 5 with two -story homes, if you have a reduced 6 setback, it looks very dense, but in Del Webb 7 communities, they are all ranch homes, so as you i 8 go down the streets, it really doesn't have the 9 feeling that these homes are so tight. 6 10 Hopefully if you go through 11 Huntley you will see that, very nice feel as you i 12 drive through the area, and a lot of that has to 13 do with the landscaping, increased landscaping in 14 the front yard, all the boulevards and all that, 15 so it just has a nice feel throughout the 16 community. 17 Lastly, we are asking for 18 reduced right -of -way widths. The reason we like I 19 to have these roads and right -of -ways, you have 20 more pedestrian streetscape. 21 A lot of these people are I 22 walking all the time, they don't want long, wide 23 roads where traffic is moving very quickly and 24 fast. This is a different type of community. We Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 19 1 want it to be safe. 2 We have curving roads. As you 3 can see, we don't have any very long, straight 4 roads, a fair amount of cul -de -sacs, which are 5 safer for some of these residents, so it's 6 really designed specifically, once again, for the 7 buyer. 8 That basically sums up a lot of i 9 9 the things I wanted to touch on. Obviously if e 10 you have some questions and things like that, I 11 will answer those for you, but I do just i 12 encourage you to keep in mind that this is a very I 13 unique community, and some of the things that we a 14 are doing here we are doing around the country, 15 and they are templates that we apply to normal 16 projects and the same thing we are doing in this I 17 Yorkville project. Thank you. 18 MR. LESLIE: I have some comments. i 19 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Jason, first we 20 have to yield the floor. i 21 MR. STUEPFERT: Matt Cudney is going 22 to say a few things as well, so I'll turn it over 23 to him. 24 WHEREUPON: Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 20 1 MATT CUDNEY, 2 testified before the Yorkville City Council as 3 follows: 4 MR. CUDNEY: Hi. I'm Matt Cudney. 1 5 I'm with Pulte and Del Webb. I've seen many of 6 you for quite some time now, so I will talk a 7 little bit tonight and I'll keep it brief. j 8 I know that we've talked a lot 9 9 in many different meetings, in the Committee of 10 the Whole meetings and some of the Economic 11 Development Committee meetings, in terms of what 12 this project is and what this project can bring j I 13 to Yorkville. 14 And, first off, I just really 15 want to kind of emphasize a couple of things we 16 have talked about in saying this is a project 17 that is unlike anything that has been done in 18 Yorkville before, and so I really encourage you I 19 to kind of take off the mindset of looking at 20 this as a traditional development at least in 21 terms of the Del Webb portion and open your minds 22 to what this actually is. 23 This is an age- restricted I 24 community that is going to be only available to Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 21 1 people who are 55 and older, provides a very 2 vital housing opportunity for many people who i 3 presently live in Yorkville and want to downsize 4 and really have no place to go. 5 And just really, as we go 6 through this, I know that it can be very, very 7 difficult to get past sometimes the lot sizes 8 you've done a really good job of trying to 9 maintain throughout your typical residential i 10 developments in Yorkville. 11 This is, again, completely i 12 different than anything that you have seen , 13 before. 14 It may not necessarily be what 15 you personally would want to live in, but I think 16 there are some people who work in the City that 17 can testify that they have received many phone 18 calls, I have received some emails from people, I 19 have talked to some people who are actually in 20 the audience tonight who have asked me when they 21 can move in. 22 This is something that people 23 who presently live in Yorkville are interested in 24 and want to see. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 22 1 What we are trying to do -- and 2 I'll spend very little time on the Pulte portion 3 because that is not going to be unique -- that is 4 going to meet the straight zoning, it's not going 5 to be townhomes, it's all single- family detached, 6 it's very consistent with what you have in your 7 Comprehensive Plan, so I think from what we are 8 talking about, there really aren't variances or i 9 exceptions that we are looking for in that. i 10 And primarily what I want to 11 focus on tonight is the focus on the other areas i 12 in the public area later tonight, but it is the 13 Del Webb portion that I think people really need 14 to understand to try to figure out what we're 15 trying to do here, and that's the reason we are I 16 going for a PUD, and I think it's a perfect 17 example of why you have a PUD ordinance, is to 18 allow certain variances and ordinances to allow a i 19 different type of community than what you have. 20 This is a blueprint that's been 21 used throughout the country, and you might ask 22 yourself why does Del Webb work, and I would say 23 Del Webb works for a couple different reasons. 24 One, we have 30 years of Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 23 1 experience of doing this. We've done this in 2 several states across the country. We are very 3 concerned about what kind of product we put out, " 4 we are very concerned about what kind of housing 1 5 we offer, we are concerned with the lifestyle 6 people have, and that's one things Del Webb is 7 concerned about, is their lifestyle. ,I I 8 The lifestyle that a Del Webb 9 community provides is a couple different things. 10 One, we have an amenity center that is sized 11 appropriately and adequately. i 12 There is a director of I i 13 activities who organizes activities and clubs at 14 the request of different residents, and perhaps 15 most importantly for a lot of seniors is the fact 16 this is a no maintenance community. They will I 17 not have to worry about mowing lawns, snow 18 removal. I 19 There are small yards where i 20 they can do some plantings on their own if they 21 so desire, but for them this is something that 22 they can go ahead and not have to worry about any 23 of those things as sometimes when you downsize is 24 not what you want to deal with. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 24 1 We want to spend our time 2 playing with our grandkids or playing bocce or 3 any of the other things in the community. 4 Del Webb is value. We have 5 reasonable home pricing. What we're trying to 6 make sure is that these people, as they downsize, I 7 that they can afford this home. j 8 One of the things you don't 9 really want is to have a large mortgage after you 10 retire, and what we try and do is provide 11 reasonable finance -- or reasonable pricing so I 12 that as people sell their homes and downsize, I 13 they either can pay cash for their home or have a 14 reasonable down payment so that their monthly -- 15 their monthly payment is low. 16 In addition to that, there is a l 17 low monthly assessment. We try and keep the 18 assessment as low as possible in order to provide 19 all the amenities that these people want. 20 I'd just like to talk about a i 21 couple what I think are the direct benefits to j 22 Yorkville. 23 I think one of the biggest 24 benefits is there is a significant increase in Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 25 1 property taxes in particular that would benefit 2 the schools without any impact to the schools. 3 In an age- restricted community, 4 people who are -- you cannot have anybody who is 1 5 actually 21, under 21, live there, so you may 6 have some grandkids come and visit, but they 7 actually cannot come and live with you. In order j 8 to actually purchase them, you have to be 55 and I 9 older. 10 So what you are doing is you 11 are actually generating a bunch of tax credits, 12 and we have finished up a fiscal impact study, 13 which you should be receiving next week, if not 14 this week, just for the Del Webb portion of the 15 project. 16 In addition, as you look at the 17 populations that are generated by this, because 18 they are ranch homes and they are geared towards 19 people who are 55 and older, the average ' 20 population in each home is 1.8 people. 21 Your ordinance talks about your 22 regular single- family homes, and that includes 23 people with children, and that is 3.75, so you 24 have a much different -- big difference in the Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 26 1 population, and that's -- let me just talk a 2 little bit about the sheet that I handed out. i 3 It's talking a little bit about 4 comparing what it would be if this was an 5 actual -- besides an active adult community to a 6 traditional community, and the chart on the top 7 basically says that if you just went in with a j 8 density of 2.5, and for this particular area here j 9 it is the transitional zoning, which you could R t t 10 have density up to 3.5 per acre, so I did take 11 the maximum, I just took the 3.5, lowered it to i 12 three people per unit, and I just want to point i 13 out the difference in the homes. 14 If you look on the top one, 15 there is -- in the Del Webb portion, it's 811 16 homes. If we were to have traditional homes 17 there with the same -- with this density of 2.5, 18 so it is a little less dense, you would have 183 19 more homes for Del Webb. I 20 But look at the population. 21 That's almost a thousand more people, and almost 22 all of those people are children, which are going 23 to be an impact to the school district. 24 And I provided two examples on t' Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 27 1 here, a density of 2.5 per acre and a 3.0 per 2 acre, just to show what we are looking for in 3 terms of what's going to be generated through the 4 population for this development, so I think what l' 5 you can -- what I will try now to tell you is you i 6 have a fewer number of people in these homes, 7 you're going to have a decrease in your usage in 8 terms of utilities and also a decrease in terms I 9 -of your road usage. I 10 These are people who are 11 typically retired, they do not travel in peak E i 12 times. Most people at this point are no longer 13 working or are working part -time and they have 14 more flexibility with their hours, so in addition 15 to that, they are not using the roadways when 16 everybody else is. 17 In addition, Del Webb 18 communities they are more cost effective in terms I 19 of maintenance of the infrastructure. 20 Those are what I think are some f 21 of the direct benefits to Yorkville. I think 22 there are also some residual benefits as well i 23 that are not directly proportional to this. 24 But we have done different Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 28 1 studies as well, and the study you will receive 2 is 37 percent of the people who live in the Del 3 Webb communities are actively volunteering in the 4 community outside of the Del Webb area itself, I 5 and I think that's really big. I 6 Yorkville prides itself on f 7 having such community involvement, and they have 8 so many people who do so many good things here, 9 as recognized by the Moose tonight and other R 10 people recognized for things that they do. 11 37 percent of the people that 12 live in Del Webb want to do good things. They i 13 are also consumers, they want to shop close at 14 home, and I think if you talk to different people 15 in the Economic Development Committee, Del Webb 16 communities provide a really strong economic 17 engine for growth for retail. 18 And another thing I think that 19 is very important is it allows long -term 20 residents to remain in the area. There is a big 21 market for people who want to live in a community 22 like Del Webb, and there's really nothing out 23 there for them, no place for them to go, and I 24 think that is a real big plus for this community Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 i I 29 1 as well. 2 That pretty much wraps up what 3 we have in terms of a formal presentation. If 4 the public has questions, we also have our 5 engineer here as well to answer any specific 6 questions. a 7 MAYOR PROCHASKA: At this time I 8 would ask if there is anybody that would like to I 9 ask any questions of any of the gentlemen here or 10 make any comment on this particular project and 11 annexation agreement. I 12 (No Response) { i 13 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Hearing none, 1 14 Alderman Leslie, I believe you have comments. 15 MR. LESLIE: I've seen this project 16 a couple of times, it's gone through EDC. I want 17 to point out -- I'm sorry, I don't remember his 18 name -- some of the right -of -ways, lot sizes, I 19 think it's only fair to point out that it does i! 20 aid the developer as well. 21 I understand that the aging 22 population may not want to maintain a lawn, but 23 there is a motive for profit here. I think it's 24 fine, I just want to state that. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 30 1 In specific, item number 20, I 2 notice you had the establishment of a special 3 service area, installation, public improvement I 4 benefit, conventional and residential parcel, 5 something we are seeing more and more. a 6 I would like to see if we can I d 7 get the specific insight of the developer why the I I 8 application for an SSA. 1 9 And then two other items for 10 the plan that you've already heard insofar as the 11 EMS services, it's very consolidated. I 12 understand the rolling meadows aspect as you are 13 driving through. 14 This to me looks like 15 reminiscent of a Boulder Hill, a lot of straight 16 streets. I can get lost in it myself. I have 17 concerns with plowing it as far as physical ! t 18 constraints, getting it plowed, and as an older 19 geriatric population moves in, snow removal is 20 going to be important, and finding their way in i 21 and out would be important as well. 22 So aside from that, I think I 23 you've heard a lot of comments going through EDC, 24 I think it's a noble effort, but I have a few Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 it 31 1 challenges. 2 MAYOR PROCHASKA: I guess the SSA 3 would be the first. I 4 MR. CUDNEY: All right. One of the 5 things to talk about, and I know there have been 6 a lot of discussions about the SSA, and I think 7 the thing to talk about is in particular with the 8 Del Webb portion of it, we would not be j 9 requesting an SSA on the Del Webb portion of the 10 community for a couple different reasons. I 11 One is, again, trying to keep i 12 the value for the population and the market that I I 13 we are going for in this, and it's very, very 14 difficult to add the SSA to that, but one of the 15 things that we are doing is if you look at the 16 roadway improvements in particular that are going f 17 to be taken care of with this development, there 18 are significant improvements along Route 47 that N 19 are going to aid everyone in the area. �I 20 Again, significant improvements 21 - along the baseline road, along the extension of 22 Beecher, which I understand is a very important 23 aspect of your transportation plan, and also some 24 improvements along Galena Road in terms of -- and Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 32 1 what I'm going to be talking about right now with 2 the SSA are things that are going to be regional 3 improvements into the region as a whole and not I i 4 just specifically this development, and I think 5 in hearing a lot of the discussions you've had, 6 many people have had, maybe the developer should Ii 7 pay their way if they want to come in Yorkville 8 and they shouldn't be putting any landscaping in I 9 there. They should be paying for infrastructure 10 in their own site. 11 And I think that that's a fair 12 and legitimate argument to make, but the other 13 thing I would say is that in terms of doing 14 things that are perhaps above and beyond what 15 would normally be done for a development like 1 16 this and certain things that are going to be 17 benefiting the region as a whole, those should be 18 things that should be eligible for the SSA, and I 19 think we could work with the City to kind of 20 identify those and identify certain parameters in 21 terms of what should be included in an SSA and 22 specific dollar amounts in terms of what should 23 be included in an SSA to try and really control 24 how much is there and what that -- what that Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 i 33 1 actually is. So I hope that answers your SSA 2 question. 1 3 In terms of a couple of the i 4 other things you talked about, EMS services and wk 5 plowing, you know, we've had different meetings 6 with the City Staff, and I don't believe there 7 are any concerns that were actually given by any j i 8 of the -- any of the people at the fire I 9 department or the police department that were 10 there. 11 It's like any other i 12 subdivision; oftentimes when it's new, you 13 oftentimes get lost in it. I imagine people will 14 be getting lost in Grande Reserve quite a bit. 15 But what we have found in 16 particular with this particular age group, they a i 17 don't want people coming in there that really 18 don't belong there, and that's one of the reasons 1 19 there aren't a lot of interconnections with other 20 streets. 21 This is something very 22 important. They want the security of knowing 23 that people who are in their neighborhood are 24 people who belong there. And, again, the way Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I i I 34 1 that it is laid out is something that that will 2 provide. { 3 I don't think that snowplowing 4 has been an issue. I know it hasn't been an 5 issue in Sun City. We are doing a couple other 6 developments around here. p I 7 It's something that happens all j 8 along. You're going to have -- you figure it out j i 9 as you go along in terms of the first time you go 10 in and get lost, and I would say that I wouldn't 11 want to shortchange any of the people who live 12 there by saying that they're not going to be able 13 to find their way around because I know a lot of 14 people, you know, particularly in a lot of these 15 developments like having the areas there so it's 16 not easy for people to get to. i 17 MR. LESLIE: I hope you go with me Y 18 on the first tour getting in and out. 19 MR. CUDNEY: Absolutely. And, 20 again, I don't know how many people have gotten 21 out to look at other developments that we've 22 done, but I think it's very important. 23 I think it gives you a better w 24 understanding and a better feel for how the whole Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 i 35 1 thing works because it's hard to look at this 2 right now and on paper try and conceptualize how 3 this all flows, and I know that Alderman Burd had 4 brought up in terms of going to Sun City to make I I 5 sure that you get off the beaten path and not i 6 directly around the golf course because that may i 7 give you a false sense of the open space that are 8 there. 9 But there are many { 10 neighborhoods around there next to the golf 11 course that will show you just how the community I 12 flows, and after about five or six years you can 13 see the development of the landscaping, you can 14 see the development of the homes. It really is a 15 beautiful community. It really is. 16 MR. LESLIE: Thank you. 17 MS. OHARE: Question. 18 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Yes. t, 19 MS. OHARE: Sir, before you walk 20 away, I have an email letter to the City engineer 21 and he's brought up several issues. Have any of 22 those been addressed? 23 MR. CUDNEY: Depends on the date of 24 your letter. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I I I 36 1 MS. OHARE: September 12. 2 MR. CUDNEY: There are certain f 3 things within that letter that I think we can let 4 our engineer actually talk about. 5 Some of the things on there in 6 terms of I think some of the turning, curves -- 7 MS. OHARE: Right. 8 MR. CUDNEY: -- I think some of that 9 is by design. We want to have those curves in 10 there for several different reasons. i 11 Some of those are travel 12 calming devices because as you have those curves 13 that are a little sharper, people have to go 14 slower within those areas. 15 Unless you have anything more 16 specific, I'm not sure what you would want me to e 17 address. 18 MS. OHARE: I didn't know -- 19 There is just a list here and I didn't know if ti 20 they were being addressed here. 21 MR. CUDNEY: We had met several 22 times with Mr. Whitehouse in terms of what he's 23 got and what he wants. 24 I think he understands and Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 37 1 recognizes the fact that this is a very different 2 type of community and so it needs to be looked at 3 in a little bit different way than your 4 traditional community would be looked at. G 5 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Rose? 6 MS. SPEARS: I do have several C 7 questions for you. You are talking about smaller 8 lot sizes. 9 Are these sizes that's going to f 10 be the same as you have in your development in 11 Plainfield? 12 MR. CUDNEY: The development -- 13 MS. SPEARS: Is that the one in 14 Plainfield that you said? Where is your other 15 one? 16 MR. CUDNEY: No. We've got one in a 17 Shorewood. 18 MS. SPEARS: Shorewood. Okay. 19 MR. CUDNEY: I think these are j 20 similar in size to the ones in Shorewood. 21 MS. SPEARS: Okay. Because I think 22 the houses are very close in there. I did go 23 through there, and I just don't feel that homes I P 24 should be on lots that size. I think they are Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I i f 38 ` I 1 very close. 2 And it reminds me of living 3 back in the City; when your neighbor sneezes, you I 4 say God bless you. You can hear everything. I 5 don't like that. ,I 6 MR. CUDNEY: And I confess that you 7 don't like that and there are a lot of other j 8 people who may like that, and I ask you to keep 9 that in mind as well. j 10 MS. SPEARS: Okay. I will. And 11 also what are you estimating your average home 12 cost, average ranch home cost, is in here? 13 MR. CUDNEY: The average home cost 14 probably on the attached project, our duplexes, 15 are going to be the low 200's -- 16 MS. SPEARS: Okay. 17 MR. CUDNEY: -- starting out, the 18 mid -200's probably for our classic, and probably 19 the high 200's for what we call premier. 20 MS. SPEARS: And those are your 21 ranch homes? 22 MR. CUDNEY: They are all ranch. 23 MS. SPEARS: They are all ranch, 24 okay. You do have an association, correct, that Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I I 39 1 would be maintaining the yards and everything for 2 the individuals? r 3 MR. CUDNEY: Correct. , 4 MS. SPEARS: That really shouldn't 5 be an issue about having smaller lot sizes. 6 Are you going to have on- street 1 7 parking? 8 MR. CUDNEY: You know what? 9 Probably not with this. We usually -- In most of 10 our Del Webb communities we have on- street 11 parking on one side of the street, because of the i 12 reduced right -of -ways that we have requested, so 13 usually there is plenty of parking within -- all 14 homes have two car garages, so there is two I 15 spaces there, two spaces in the drive, and then 16 in certain areas there could be parking on the 17 street. 18 MS. SPEARS: Okay. Because I think 19 you were here at one of our meetings when we had 20 a lot of discussions on the problems that we are 21 currently experiencing in the City with on- street I 22 parking, and we are trying to do an ordinance, so 23 if you have smaller right -of -ways, reduced 24 right -of -ways, and even though you have parking Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 40 1 allowing it on one side of the street, I know 2 it's going to be based on what our ordinance 3 calls for, but I am a little concerned with your p 4 request to reduce the right -of -ways. 5 MR. CUDNEY: And if I might say with 6 that, again, with the parking that you would face a, 7 in a traditional community, again, you have many 8 where people that are in homes and have cars and p, 4 9 most of the people in terms of when people come i 10 in our Del Webb communities, we have not had an 11 issue with parking. I 12 MS. SPEARS: Okay. And are your 13 facilities -- I know you're going to have many, 14 many different facilities that are geared to the 15 seniors, and I think that's great. 16 Are they going to be open to 17 our various seniors that are not living in your 18 development? Will they have access? Will they 19 be able to come here? 20 MR. CUDNEY: No. That is an amenity 21 center basically for the people who are there 22 because they are the ones who are paying for the 23 support of the community center. It's part of i 24 their assessment. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I� 41 1 MS. SPEARS: Also, just a few more. 2 MR. CUDNEY: That's fine. Many as I 'r 3 you like. I 4 MS. SPEARS: You said that any 1 5 individual under the age of 21 is not allowed to i' 6 purchase a home or live there. Is that true l 7 also? 8 MR. CUDNEY: The way I believe the 9 federal law is written and the way it works, you 10 are supposed to be 55 or older to be able to 11 purchase a home. 12 Now, there may be people who I 13 are 55 who have someone -- they may be married to 14 somebody who is younger and they can live there, 15 but in order for someone to actually live there, 16 the age requirement is 21. 17 MS. SPEARS: Okay. So if a resident 18 is, let's say, 60 years old or 55 and they have 19 possibly a grandchild that's 25 and decides to 20 move in with them, is that going to be allowed, 21 and if they have children, are they going to be 22 allowed to do that? 23 MR. CUDNEY: No, not if they have 24 children. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 42 1 MS. SPEARS: So children can't 2 really move in with these people at all. 3 MR. CUDNEY: Correct. Correct. I 4 MS. SPEARS: I believe that's it. 5 Thank you. I 6 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Marty, do you have y I I 7 any? I 8 MR. MUNNS: Yeah, if you want to go. 9 Number one, I think it actually fits perfectly j 10 for Yorkville. We have a lot of traditional 11 developments going on and there is many choices 12 there. There is not many choices in this genre I 13 of homes, do all the maintenance and have the 14 yard. 15 I like the less population. I 16 am not too keen on more houses, but I think less 17 population, which means less cars, because you 18 don't have the four or five kids in the driveway i 19 and driving. Less burden on the schools is nice. 4 20 And what I like for economic building, there is 21 more disposable income in Yorkville, which 22 generates more tax for Yorkville. So that's my 23 comments. 24 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Joe. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 43 1 MR. BESCO: Yes. I also have a 2 comment on the Special Service Area first. Under 3 22, the wording is primary funding mechanism. So 4 I'm sure that can be changed. 5 And then another observation I 6 had was there is 17 cul -de -sacs in the Del Webb I 7 portion. There is 24 total. That's very I 8 time - consuming to snowplow. 9 Personally I think in a 10 situation like this that a back -up SSA for 11 plowing and making private would be much more 12 appropriate. That would be very time - consuming 13 on our public works department. i 14 And like Jason, I know if I was 15 plowing that in the middle of the night, I'd get 16 lost, too. 17 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Anyone else? i 18 MS. SPEARS: Can I have one more? IEI 19 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Okay. 20 MS. SPEARS: Sorry. Recently our 21 Council has been talking about, especially with 22 age restricted or senior targeted areas, to -- 23 instead of applying money to -- and this is 24 something that our Council has to work out, Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 44 1 instead of applying funds strictly to our parks 2 department, that the funds would be applied to e 3 have a new facility built for our seniors, and my 4 personal opinion is I am going to wait before I 5 vote on any developments such as this until our 6 City has all this in place so we know exactly 7 what percent would be allocated to a community 8 center for our seniors. 9 MR. CUDNEY: I think -- j 10 MS. SPEARS: It's something that 11 needs to be worked out with you. i 12 MR. CUDNEY: Absolutely. I think 13 that you know I was there at the meeting last i 14 week when you were discussing a lot of the 15 issues, and I think it's vital, particularly as 16 our population continues to age, to have services q 17 that are available for seniors, and I think 18 internally it's a decision that you may -- what 19 you want to do with the dollars that are 20 generated by any developers go towards that, and, l 21 you know, I have been -- I am in support of 22 whatever you want to do, and I'm not sure what 23 you actually need to do in terms of that. i 24 I think you can allocate Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 45 1 whatever funding you want. If anything, a parks 2 department, that's funding you can allocate any 3 way you want, so I guess I defer to your Council 4 what we need to do. I think it's a good idea. 5 MS. SPEARS: Thank you. 6 MS. OHARE: One more comment here? I I 7 I do support the Del Webb. I like the looks of 8 it. I've seen several of them. I have toured 9 Huntley and you have one up near Elgin. 10 MR. CUDNEY: One in Elgin, too. 11 MS. OHARE: I have toured that one. 12 I do qualify, but -- and I have a couple people I 13 that are professionally retired and they are i 14 waiting, anxiously waiting, to see if you could 15 come in, and I think we should be pleased that 16 you have selected our area. 17 I think it would do a lot of 18 people -- not just people that live in Yorkville, 19 but people that want to move out of other I 20 surrounding communities that just want to come 21 this way. So I think it's a good idea. 22 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Paul? 23 MR. JAMES: I'd like to say it's 24 nice to see that you are doing a whole community Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 46 1 that's dedicated for the seniors. I think that's 2 outstanding. i 3 There is a couple challenges I 4 like they are talking about, but I think those 1 5 are things that we can work through. I really II� 6 want to see this type of community come into h i I 7 Yorkville. 8 And the biggest thing is, you 9 know, there are possibly you are saying 10 approximately 800 homes and there is no impact on 11 the school system, and -- well, there is impact, l 12 and that is that there is fees that are coming 13 into the school system, so, you know, I think 14 that's outstanding. 15 That's something that's very J 16 important, you know, that we put a whole 17 community in there and they are helping pay for 18 our school system without putting any students in A 19 the schools. 20 MR. CUDNEY: And I think that to add 21 on to that, I think also when you go back to the 22 percentage of that 37 percent of the people who 23 live there are actively volunteering in the ; 24 community outside of the Del Webb, to tap into i Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 47 1 mentors, to tap into speakers, to tap into a 2 great resource, you know, that you can build a 3 lot of synergy within the school district itself, 4 that it really begs for that to happen. 5 MR. JAMES: And I guess to address 6 the parking and stuff, I've seen -- A lot of 7 communities I've seen like this, most of the 8 homes, there is very few homes that really have 9 two cars. Parking is not an issue in these 10 communities. 11 It's basically the homes that i 12 have one car and they park it in the garage, and i 13 I don't see that as being a problem. i 14 And the other thing is if this 15 does go through, I was just curious of 16 projections of when you would start building and 17 when you think the first home would be up for 18 sale. 19 MR. CUDNEY: We would like to start 20 building sometime in the spring. I think -- I 21 mentioned at a couple different meetings when we 22 opened our community in Elgin in Edgewater, we 23 opened for sales on Saturday and there were j 24 people waiting in line on the Wednesday night Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 48 1 before, so there is a very large demand. 2 And as I've said already, I've i 3 gotten phone calls, I've gotten emails, I'm sure 4 you can talk to Liz D'Anna, she has fielded many, 5 many phones call from people who want to know 6 when they can move in. p 7 I think it will be better for 8 Yorkville in terms of being able to attract more 9 retail. 10 I think there is re -- Retail 11 is coming into Yorkville right now and they are I 12 just -- this is going to be the beautiful thing 13 that helps put everything over the edge. i 14 MR. JAMES: So there are people 15 basically contacting you already? 16 MR. CUDNEY: Right. And it goes I 17 into a lead bank, and they have contacted their 18 alderman already and said that they are in 19 support of the project. 20 MR. JAMES: So I guess -- you know, 21 I've had people ask me. So how do I direct them 22 to you? 23 MR. CUDNEY: Okay. I'll give you 24 my phone number. And you know what? I don't Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 49 1 know that they have set up anything 2 specifically. What we try and do is -- The 3 y y i 4 haven't set up anything specifically where people 5 can actually call in directly at this point 6 because we haven't approved the project and we 7 don't want to put the cart before the horse. 8 I know a lot of other 9 developers that have gotten in trouble that are 10 advertising without having gotten approval. 11 I can get their information, 12 direct them where to get the right information, i 13 and my direct line at the office is 847 - 841 -3583. 14 Need that again? 15 MR. GRAFF: Don't worry, I'll give 16 it out. 17 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Is there anyone 18 else on the Council that would like to make a 19 statement? 20 MS. SPEARS: He might want to repeat I 21 his name for the people. 22 MR. CUDNEY: My name is Matt 23 Cudney. That's C- U- D- N -E -Y. My number is j 24 847 - 841 -3583. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 50 1 MS. OHARE: Changing your number 2 tomorrow? 3 MR. CUDNEY: It's always great to 4 talk to people and, you know, I think that a lot i I 5 of the concerns that people have brought up are 6 valid concerns and I think are concerns that we f 1 7 have heard in almost every new community that we 8 have started out in because it is something that 9 is completely different than what most people 10 have ever seen before, so the questions are all 11 good. The questions are all right on target. 12 The only thing that I can take 13 in is that, you know, this is a different type of I 14 development than your traditional family -type 15 neighborhood with, you know, two stories and big i 16 lots and lots of kids, and we've been doing this 17 for 30 years now and this is -- these are things 18 that we have seen work in every place in the j I 19 country, and so we're not asking for anything 20 more, not asking for anything less, just going 'i 21 with what we know and what we know best, and 22 that's about all that I can say about that, and f d 23 they are very good questions and they are 24 questions that are right on, and we've heard I Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 51 1 these questions at almost every place we have 2 gone in, so I commend you for doing your 3 homework. If you haven't taken a look at the 4 community, do so. 5 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Anyone else? 6 (No Response) 7 MAYOR PROCHASKA: I would like to 8 say thank you. I have visited two of the 9 communities, the Sun City and the one in Elgin. 10 I did have an opportunity to 11 talk to a couple of the residents, I got a little 12 input from them on,their thoughts, and they 13 seemed very pleased with where they lived, and I 14 did make a point to go into the neighborhoods. 15 One of the things that -- a i 16 question I have for you, I've heard this several j 17 times and I want to make sure we are talking I 18 about the same thing, is the reduced 19 right -of -ways, that are we talking about reducing i 20 the actual street width? 21 MR. CUDNEY: And that's a very good 22 point. We are not talking about reducing the 23 street widths, except I believe in the area of 24 the duplexes. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 52 1 MR. STUEPFERT: No. 2 MR. CUDNEY: Not even there? Not I 3 even there. So we are not reducing the amount of i 4 pavement that we are putting down, we are 5 reducing the right -of -way and the parkways, so 6 the streets themselves are not smaller, but, you 1 7 know, it's a real good point in terms of the way 8 the right -of -ways are, you have a lot of -- lot 9 of area that's there that is not necessarily part 10 of the street itself. 11 Oftentimes in your right -of -way 12 you run some utilities, and we do have utility I 13 easements that are there, so in terms of actually I i 14 developing the property and actually having the 15 City have access to these different things, there 16 is not an issue with that. That's all part of j 17 the plan. 18 MAYOR PROCHASKA: And then the only 19 other thing I just wanted to make a point of, I 20 was contacted by the Superintendent of Schools i 21 and I believe they are having their attorneys 22 look at the language dealing with the fee 23 structure for especially the Del Webb area. i 24 I believe, you know, that's Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 53 1 something that's been talked about for many 2 years, especially when it comes to age 3 restricted, so I suspect we'll see some -- some 4 letter or some kind of comment that comes. 5 That's what I've been told. So that may come 6 before this gets passed also. 7 Other than that, does anyone 8 else have any other comments? 9 MS. SPEARS: Is this going to have y 10 fire district fees listed in here as well? 11 MAYOR PROCHASKA: I think they said 12 individually. I believe, John, did we say all f 13 the fees? 'i 14 MR. WYETH: Under ordinance or 15 specifically. I will double - check. 16 MR. CUDNEY: A thousand dollars is 17 the impact fee. 18 MAYOR PROCHASKA: It needs to be -- i 19 good point. 20 MR. GRAFF: We will introduce an i 21 exhibit that will be in your box now that we have 22 the numbers which will have all the fees. 23 MAYOR PROCHASKA: And that will be 24 one of the exhibits that will be attached to i Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 54 1 this? 2 MR. CUDNEY: Correct. 3 MR. GRAFF: We will do that for you. 4 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Okay. If there is I �. 5 no other questions, I would entertain a motion to 6 close the public hearing. I II 7 MS. SPEARS: So moved. 8 MS. OHARE: Second. I 9 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Moved and 10 seconded. May I have roll call, please? 11 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Burd. 12 MS. BURD: Aye. 1 i 13 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: James. 14 MR. JAMES: Aye. ? 15 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Leslie. 16 MR. LESLIE: Aye. 17 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Munns. 18 MR. MUNNS: Aye. 19 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Ohare. 1 20 MS. OHARE: Aye. 21 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Spears. 22 MS. SPEARS: Aye. 23 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Wolfer. i 24 MR. WOLFER: Aye. Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 55 1 MS. MILSCHEWSKI: Besco. 2 MR. BESCO: Aye. 3 MAYOR PROCHASKA: Motion is carried. 4 We are now out of public hearing. 1, 5 (Which were all the 6 public hearing 7 proceedings had at 8 the date and time 9 aforementioned.) 10 --- 000 - -- 11 12 13 14 15 i 16 17 18 19 20 i 21 i 22 23 i 24 i Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 I 56 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ss: 2 COUNTY OF LASALLE ) 3 I 4 CHRISTINE M. VITOSH, being first duly 5 sworn, on oath says that she is a Certified I 6 Shorthand Reporter doing business in the State of I 7 Illinois; 8 That she reported in shorthand the I 9 proceedings had at the foregoing public hearing; 10 And that the foregoing is a true and 11 correct transcript of her shorthand notes so 12 taken as aforesaid and contains all the 13 proceedings had at the said public hearing. 14 IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set 15 my hand this C 8 day of - -' _ _�G � 16 2005. 17 i I 18 19 20 - -- — -- - -- - - -- CHRISTINE M. VITOSH, C.S.R. 21 CSR License No. 084 - 002883 i 22 j 23 24 I Depo Court Reporting Service (630) 983 -0030 i I Yorkville City Council Multi-Page ` & - Committee September 13, 2005 above - entitled [11 1:7 24:19 balance [il 10:22 - &- Absolutely [21 34:19 amenity [31 16:3 23:10 bank [11 48:17 - C - 44:12 40:20 based [i1 40:2 & [z1 2:15 9:8 C [11 2:14 access [31 16:8 40:18 amount [2] 19:4 52:3 baseline [11 31:21 52: amounts [11 32:22 B a y z C - U - D - - - [11 15 _Q_ y [ 1 14:17 15:1 49:23 acre [4] 14:11 26:10 27:1 ANN [1] 2:10 bears [1] 11:11 C.S.R. [21 1:8 56:20 084 - 002883 [ 1] 56:21 27:2 annex [2] 3:7 7:14 acres [s1 3:14 5:3,12 7:23 beaten [11 35:5 calls [31 21:18 40:3 48:3 annexation [11] 3:11 5:2 beautiful [21 35:15 48:12 calming [11 36:12 10:23 -1- 5:15 7:20 11:3,8,11,15,18 Beecher [11 31:22 cannot [21 25:4,7 9 1.8 [11 25:20 active [1] 26:5 11:20 29:11 183 [11 26:18 actively [21 28:3 46:23 annexed [11 10:8 begs [11 47:4 car [2] 39:14 47:12 activities [21 23:13,13 answer [5] 5:19 11:19 behalf [ 11 2:17 care [11 31:17 actual [2] 26:5 51:20 12:7 19:11 29:5 belong [21 33:18,24 carried [41 4:14 7:9 8:24 ' _2 _ add [31 15:14 31 :14 46:20 answers [11 33:1 benefit [2] 25:1 30:4 55:3 2.5 [3] 26:8,17 27:1 cars [31 40:8 42:17 47:9 addition [41 24:16 25:16 anxiously [11 45:14 benefiting [1] 32:17 20.375 [11 3:14 27:14,17 appearance [1] 16:2 benefits [41 24:21,24 cart [11 49:7 200's [2] 38:15,19 additional [1] 9:21 appeared [2] 2:17 10:24 27:21,22 Carton [11 9:8 # 2005 [21 1:9 56:16 address [21 36:17 47:5 application [1] 30:8 berming [1] 16:15 cash [11 24:13 25 [11 41:19 Besco [111 2:9 3:19,22,23 cat [11 10:10 addressed [z1 35:22 applied [ 11 44:2 g 36:20 7:7,8 8:8,9 43:1 55:1,2 center [4] 23:10 40:21,23 - 3 - adequately [1] 23:11 apply [11 applying [z1 4 [2 1 4 best [1] 50:21 44:8 adjacent [21 5:5 14:16 3:23 44:1 better [3] 34:23,24 48:7 centers [11 16:4 3.0 [11 27:1 l appropriate [1] 43:12 j 3.17 [11 14:11 Administrator [11 2:11 beyond [11 32:14 Centex [1] 14:18 adult [11 26:5 appropriately [1] 23:11 big [61 17:19 25:24 28:5 certain [8] 13:9,17 15:11 3.5 [z1 26:10,11 approval [41 10:21 11:5 28:20,24 50:15 22:18 32:16,20 36:2 39:16 3.75 [11 25:23 advertising [11 49:10 11:16 49:10 afford [11 24:7 biggest [21 24:23 46:8 Certified [ 11 56:5 30 [3] 10:23 22:24 50:17 a approved [21 11:2 49:6 bit ul 12:5,1120:7 26:2,3 challenges [21 31:146:3 300 [ 11 2:15 aforementioned [ 11 area [13] 14:18,18:12 33:14 37:3 37 [3] 28:2,11 46:22 55:9 22:12 26:8 28:4,20 30:3 changed [11 43:4 bless [11 38:4 Changing [ 1] 50:1 aforesaid [1] 56:12 31:19 43:2 45:16 51:23 380 [11 2:15 blueprint [11 22:20 52:9,23 again [121 16:4,9,16 19:6 CHARLES [1] 9:3 21:11 31:11,20 33:24 areas [71 16:14,16 22:11 bocce [1] 24:2 chart [1] 26:6 -4- 34:20 40:6,7 49:14 34:15 36:14 39:16 43:22 Boulder [1] 30:15 children [51 25:23 26:22 47 [5] 7:24 14:19 16:15 age [61 33:16 41:5,16 argument [1] 32:12 boulevard [1] 15:18 41:21,24 42:1 16:22 31:18 43:22 44:16 53:2 ARTHUR [11 2:2 boulevards [1] 18:14 choices [21 42:11,12 age- restricted [3] 10:19 aside [1] 30:22 box [11 53:21 CHRISTINE [3] 1:8 _5_ 20:23 25:3 aspect [2] 30:12 31:23 brief [11 20:7 56:4,20 55 [61 21:1 25:8,19 41:10 agenda [2] 3:3 7:10 assessment [3] 24:17,18 bring [1] 20:12 Chuck [11 9:7 41:13,18 aging [1] 29:21 40:24 Bristol [31 3:16 7:24 city [301 1:1,2,10 2:11,12 587 [11 7:23 agreement [e] 3:12 7:21 association [11 38:24 14:17 2:17 3:7 4:23 5:8,14 6:3 11:8,11,15,18,20 29:11 attached [z1 38:14 53:24 BROMBEREK [ 11 7:14,16 9:4,17 11:16 Agricultural [31 3:8,9 2:15 12:16 20:2 21:16 32:19 �-' -6- attorney 21 4:20 5:23 7:15 Y 33:6 34:5 35:4,20 38:3 60 [11 41:18 ahead [1] 23:22 attorneys [11 52:21 brought [31 35:4,21 50:5 39:21 44:6 51:9 52:15 60563 [1] 2:16 attract [1] 48:8 buffers [11 16:14 classic [11 38:18 aid [z1 29:20 31:19 build [11 47:2 alderman [101 2:3,4,5,6 audience [z1 5:22 21:20 classification [z1 5:17 - 7 - 2:7,8,9 29:14 35:3 48:18 Autumn [11 11:14 building [31 42:20 47:16 5:18 available [z1 20:24 44:17 47.20 Clerk [1] 2:12 I 7:00 [11 1:9 Alde rwoman [11 2:10 built [11 44:3 Allegiance [ 1] 3:1 Avenue [1] 2:15 close [s1 6:10 28:13 37:22 allocate [21 44:24 45:2 average [41 25:19 38:11 bunch [11 25:11 38:1 54:6 _g 38:12,13 Burd [111 2:5 3:24 4:1 clubs [11 23:13 8 -26 -05 [ 11 11:12 allocated [11 44:7 6:13,17,18 8:10,11 35:3 comi [31 33:17 46:12 away [1] 35:20 g 800 [21 1:10 46:10 allow [z1 22:18,18 54:11,12 48:11 allowed [31 41:5,2022 Aye [321 3:23 4:1,3,5,739 burden [11 42:19 811 [11 26:15 , 4:11,13 6:18,20,22,24 7:2 commend [11 51:2 847 -841 -3583 [21 allowing [11 40:1 7:4,6,8 8:9,11,13,15,17 business [21 7:19 56:6 comment [5] 11:18 29:10 49:13,24 allows [11 28:19 8:19,21,23 54:12,14,16 buyer [9] 13:1,2,10,10 43:2 45:6 53:4 almost [41 26:21,2150:7 54:18,20,22,24 55:2 13:21 17:6,13 19:7 comments [8] 5:24 6:4 51:1 buyer's [2] 13:24 14:1 14:12 19:18 29:14 30:23 along [11] 14:19 16:14,15 - B - buyers [1] 16:11 42:23 53:8 A -1 [31 3:8,9 7:15 16:15,22 31:18,21,21,24 commercial [31 10:22 B -3 [61 7:19 10:21 14:19 Byrum [61 9:3,6,7 10:1,3 able [5] 5:13 34:12.40:19 34:8,9 12:13 14:5 15:3 41:10 48:8 14:20,22,23 23 always [11 50:3 Commission [21 11:1,2 above [11 32:14 amenities [21 17:22 back -up [1] 43:10 Committee [3] 20:9,11 Depo Court Reporting Service Index Page 1 Naperville, Illinois (630) 983 -0030 i I Yorkville City Council Multi -Page TM communities - generates September 13, 2005 28:15 23:9 24:21 29:16 31:10 developing [1] 52:14 'Edgewater [i] 47:22 family -type [i] 50:14 communities [i3] 15 :5 33:3 34:5 45:12 46:3 development [2o] 7:17 effective [1] 27:18 far [11 30:17 15:16,22 18:7 27:18 28:3 47:21 51:11 7:2110:18 11:5,22 16:7 effort [1] 30:24 Farm pi 1:10 28:16 39:10 40:10 45:20 course [z] 35:6,11 18:4 20:11,20 27:4 28:15 either [i] 24;13 fast [i] 18:24 47:7,10 51:9 Court [1] 9:19 31:17 32:4,15 35:13,14 community [ao] 5:10,11 credits [i] 25:11 37:10,12 40:18 50:14 Elgin [4] 45:9,10 47:22 federal [1] 41:9 10:14,20 13:12,14,18 p 51:9 fee [2] 52:22 53:17 Creek [i] 11:14 developments [7] 17:11 elig ible [i] 32:18 g 15:15 17:18,21 18:16,24 21:10 34:6,15,21 42:11 g� feelin [i] 18:9 19:13 20:24 22:19 23:9 cross - examine [1] 5:22 44:5 email [i] 35:20 fees [4] 46:12 53:10,13 23:16 24:3 25:3 26:5,6 CSR [i] 56:21 devices [11 36:12 emails [2] 21:18 48:3 53:22 28:4,7,21,24 31:10 35:11 Cudney [4o] 12:2 19:21 difference [z] 25:24 emergency [1] 16:8 felt [1] 5:7 35:15 37:2,4 40:7,23 44:7 20:1,4,4 31:4 34:19 35:23 26:13 45:24 46:6,17,24 47:22 36:2,8,21 37:12,16,19 emphasize [i] 20:15 few [4] 19:22 30:24 41:1 50:7 51:4 38:6,13,17,22 39:3,8 40:5 different [22] 16:6,11 EMS [z] 30:11 33:4 47 :8 Comp [i] 17:4 40:20 41;2, 18:24 20:9 21:12 22:19 fewer [1] 27:6 8 23 42:3 44:9 enclaves [i] 16:6 companies [i] 10:6 44:12 45:10 46:20 47:19 22:23 23:9,14 25:24 27:24 28:14 31;10 33:5 36:10 encourage [z] 19:12 fielded [1] 48:4 a 48:16,23 49:22,23 50:3 20:18 Fifth [1] 2:15 comparing [1] 26:4 51:21 52:2 53:16 54:2 37:1,3 40:14 47:21 50:9 completely [2] 21:11 50:13 52:15 engine [i] 28:17 figure [2] 22:14 34:8 50:9 cul - -sacs [z] 19:4 43:6 difficult [z] 21:7 31:14 engineer [3] 29:5 35:20 finance [i] 24:11 36:4 compliance [2] 14:3,8 direct [6] 12:8 24:21 finding [1] 30:20 curious l :4 27:21 48:21 49:12,13 Eng ineering ineerin [i] 12:7 Comprehensive [ 3] current [3] 5:4,17,18 g g fine [a] 9:24 10:129:24 14:4,13 22 :7 directly [4] 3:14 27:23 engineers [i] 12:6 41:2 curves [3] 36:6,9, 35:6 49:5 concept [z] 15:2,12 12 entertain [4] 3:4 6:10 finished [i] 25:12 conceptualize [1] 35:2 curving [11 19:2 director [1] 23:12 11:17 54:5 fire [z] 33:8 53:10 concerned [6] 18:2 23:3 custom [2] 9:15,18 discussed [i] 11:9 entry [4] 15:13,14 16:7 firm [i] 9:7 23:4,5,7 40:3 discussing [1] 44:14 16:21 first [i2] 3:5 10:11 12:19 concerns [s] 30:17 33:7 - D - discussions [3] 31:6 entryway [1] 16:18 14:4 19:19 20:14 31:3 50:5,6,6 D'Anna [1] 48:4 32:5 39:20 especially [3] 43:21 34:9,18 43:2 47:17 56:4 conclude [i] 11:4 D- 771305 [i] 1:21 disposable [1] 42:21 52:23 53:2 fiscal [i] 25:12 confess [i] 38:6 date [3] 11:12 35:23 55:8 distinct [2] 16:6,23 establishment [i] 30:2 Fister [2] 4:18,19 consistent [s] 14:12,20 deal [1] 23:24 district [13] 3:6,10,15 5:2 estimating [1] 38:11 fits [1] 42:9 15:6 17:4 22:6 dealing [1] 52:22 5:23 7:18,19,19 10:18,22 evening [i] 12:19 fitting [1] 15:4 consisting [i] 7:17 26:23 47:3 53:10 everybody [1] 27:16 five [2] 35:12 42:18 consists [2] 3:13 7:22 DEAN [[] 2 1 doesn't [3] 17:13,14 18:8 everywhere [i] 16:16 flexi decides [1] 41:19 ty [ i ] 27:14 C [i] 30:11 decision [i] 44:18 dollar [1] 32:22 exactly [1] 44:6 floor [i] 19:20 constraints [11 30:18 dollars [2] 44:19 53:16 example [i] 22:17 flows [2] 35:3,12 consumers [1] 28:13 decrease [2] 27:7,8 done [6] 20:17 21:8 23:1 examples [i] 26:24 P focus [z] 22;11 contacted [z] 48:17 dedicated [i] 46:1 27 :24 32:15 34:22 defer [2] 4:19 45:3 except [i] 51:23 follows [4] 4:24 9:5 52:20 double -check [1 53:15 exceptions [1 22:9 12:17 20:3 contacting [11 48:15 Del [32] 9:9 10:19 12:3 Douglas [11 9:8 exciting i 15:12 18:6 20:5 g [ ] 12:22 foregoing [z] 56:9,10 13:4,12 contains [11 56:12 20:2122 15:1 18: 2 0 :5 down [6] 5:10 14:5 16:18 excuse [1] 12:13 formal [i] 29:3 18 continues [1] 44:16 24:4 25:14 26:15,19 27:17 :8 24:14 [4] executed [ii 11:16 forward [i] 5:2 contract [i] 9:10 28:2,4,12,15,22 31:8,9 downsize [a] 21;3 23:23 39:10 40:10 43:6 45:7 24:6,12 exhibit [2] 14:15 53:21 found [i] 33:15 control [z] 15:18 32;23 46:24 52:23 draft [2] 11:10,12 exhibits [1] 53:24 four [z] 9:13 42:18 conventional [3] 10:13 demand [i] 48:1 dramatic [i] 15:13 existing [3] 3:15 5:4,13 front [i] 18:14 10:15 30:4 e [2] 5:9,11 fundi 3 comer [2] 7:23 14:6 dense [2] 18:6 26:18 drive [s] 15:22 16:2,16 P g [ ] 43:3 45:1,2 � density [s] 14:10 26:8 18:12 39:15 experience [1] 23:1 funds [z] 44:1,2 Corporation [4] 7:12 26:10,17 27:1 driveway [i] 42:18 experiencing [i] 39:21 future [4] 5:9,10,12,13 9:9,9 10:15 department [s] 33:9,9 driving [z] 30:13 42:19 extension [1] 31:21 G correct [6] 38:24 39:3 43:13 44:2 45:2 dul i 42:3,3 54:2 56:11 y [ ] 56:4 -G cost [4] 27:18 38:12,12 design [i] 36:9 duplexes [z] 38:14 51:24 -F- Galena [3] 7:24 16:15 38:13 designed [i] 19:6 F [i] 2:2 31:24 E Council [l 1] 1:1 4:23 6:3 desire [11 23:21 -E- face [1] 40:6 Game[i] 1:10 9:4,18 12:16 20:2 43:21 detached [2] 15:3 22:5 E[4] 2:1,1,14,14 facilities [2] 40:13,14 garage [1] 47:12 43:24 45:3 49:18 detail [11 16:13 Counsel [i] 9;23 develo ed [3] 10:13,14 easements [i] 52:13 facility [3] 3:115:5 44:3 garages [i] 39:14 P East [i] 2:15 fact [21 23:15 37:1 Gardner [i] 9:8 country [8] 13:4,8 15:11 10:19 15:16 19:14 22:21 23:2 developer [3] 29:20 30:7 easy [1] 34:16 fair [4] 10:2 19:4 29:19 geared [2] 25:18 40:14 50:19 32;6 economic [4] 20:10 32:11 General [1] 7:18 County [s] 3:8,16 7:15 developers [z] 44:20 28 :15,16 42:20 Fairly [i] 5:1 generated [3] 25:17 27:3 8:1 56:2 49 EDC [2] 29:16 30:23 false [11 35:7 44:20 couple [121 20:15 22:23 edge [i] 48:13 familiar[i] 11;13 generates [i] 42:22 Depo Court Reporting Service Index Page 2 Naperville, Illinois (630) 983 -0030 Yorkville City Council Multi-Page TM generating - N September 13, 2005 generating [11 25:11 hours [11 27:14 itself [41 28:4,6 47:3 lifestyle [s] 17:18,21 mechanism [11 43:3 genre [1] 42:12 houses [21 37:22 42:16 52:10 23:5,7,8 meet [1] 22:4 gentlemen [11 29:9 housing [3 10:16 21:2 limited [1] 10:5 meeting [4] 1:1 9:20 geriatric [11 30:19 23:4 - J - limits [1] 5:8 44:13 given [11 33:7 Huntley [4] 16:1,22 JACQUELYN [11 2:12 line [21 47:24 49:13 meetings [61 20:9,10,11 God [11 38:4 18:11 45:9 James [13] 2:3 4:2,3 6:19 list [11 36:19 33:5 39:19 47:21 goes [11 48:16 6:20 8:12,13 45:23 47:5 listed [1] 53:10 mentioned [21 17:13 g olf [z1 35:6,10 -I- 48:14,20 54:13,14 live [141 21:3,15,23 25:5 g gone [2] 29:16 51:2 idea [21 45:4,21 Jason [3] 2:4 19:19 43:14 25:7 28:2,12,21 34:11 mentioning [11 15:9 g ood [12] 12:19 13:13 identified [2] 10:3 job [1] 21:8 41:6,14,15 45:18 46:23 mentors [1] 47:1 21:8 28:8 45:4,21 identify [21 32:20,20 Joe [11 42:24 lived [1] 51:13 met [1] 36:21 50:11,23 51:21 52:7 53:19 Illinois [81 1:2,112:16 John [2] 2:16 53:12 living [21 38:2 40:17 mid -200's [11 38:18 Grade [11 14:21 2:17 3:17 8:1 56:1,7 JOSEPH [11 2:9 Liz [11 48:4 middle [11 43:15 GRAFF [4] 2:11 49:15 imagine [1] 33:13 justification [11 17:12 LLC [31 7:12,13,13 might [s1 9:13,14 22:21 53:20 54:3 loaded [11 15:19 40:5 49:20 immediately [2] 5:4 JUSTIN [11 2:16 grandchild [11 41:19 impact [61 25:2,12 26:23 long -term [1] 28:19 MILSCHEWSKI [33] Grande [11 33:14 46:10,11 53:17 -g- longer [1] 27:12 2:12 3:22,24 4:2,4,6,8,10 andkids [21 24:2 25:6 imp ortant [�1 28:19 7:5,7 8:8,1010, look [101 11:23 16:23 4:12 6 : 7:1,3 � p keen [11 42:16 12,14,16,18 great [41 16:17 40:15 47:2 30:20,2131:22 33:22 k 1 25:16 26:14,20 31:15 8;20,22 54:11,13,15,17 ee 50:3 34:22 46:16 p [ s ] 9:12 20:7 24:17 34:21 35:151:3 52:22 54:19,21,23 55:1 31:11 38:8 GREGG [11 4:22 importantly [1] 23:15 looked [21 37:2,4 mind [z] 19:12 38:9 gross [11 14:10 impressive [11 16:21 Kendall [41 3:8 ,16 7:15 7:24 looking U1 13:17 17:17 minds [ 20:21 q group [1] 33:16 improvement [11 30:3 key [1] 18:3 17:18,20 20:19 22:9 27:2 mindset [11 20:19 growth [11 29:17 improvements [s1 kids [a1 17:19,20 42:18 looks [4] 11:13 18:6 mirror [11 5:17 31:16 18,20,24 32:3 30:14 45:7 gu ess [41 31:2 45:3 47:5 50:16 MLH [11 7:13 4 included [21 32:21,23 loop [ 1] 15:19 48:20 kind [61 20:15,19 23:3,4 money [1] 43:23 includes [1] 25:22 lost [s] 30:16 33:13,14 32:19 53:4 34:10 43:16 monthly [31 24:14,15,17 -g- income [1] 42:21 knowing [1] 33:22 Moose [1] 28:9 increase [11 24:24 lots [6] 15:19 17:7 18:2 hand [11 56:15 37:24 50:16,16 mortgage [11 24:9 handed [11 26:2 increased [11 18:13 -L- low [41 24:15,17,18 38:15 most [6] 23:15 27:12 39:9 hard [1] 35:1 individual [11 41:5 L [11 9:3 lowered [11 26:11 40:9 47:7 50:9 hear [3 12:24 13:22 38:4 individually [21 9:16 laid [11 34:1 motion U] 3:4 4:14 6:10 53:12 7:9 8:24 54:5 55:3 individuals [1] 39:2 land [11 12:11 heard [s1 30:10,23 50:7 lakes [11 16:3 -M- motive [1] 29:23 I , l i 50:24 51:16 hearing [191 3:5,11 4:15 information [21 49:11 M [31 1:8 56:4,20 g 49:12 landscaping [�1 16:15 maintain [5] 17:14,15 move [s1 48 : 41:20 6:2,11 7:11,11,20 9:12 16:20 17:16 18:13,13 32:8 42:2 45:19 48:6 infrastructure [21 27:19 17:15 21:9 29:22 11:7,8 29:13 32:5 54:6 35:13 moved [81 3:18,20 6:12 language [11 52:22 55:4,6 56:9,13 32:9 maintaining [1] 39:1 6:15 8:4,6 54:7,9 hearings [2] 3:3 11:1 1NGEMUNSON [31 maintenance [41 17:8 moves [11 30:19 j 4:22 5:1 6:8 large [2] 24:9 48:1 23:16 27:19 42:13 HEITZ [11 2:15 input [1] 51:12 largely [1] 11:14 market [2] 28:21 31:12 moving [11 18:23 help [11 16:23 LASALLE [11 56:2 mowing [1] 23:17 insight [11 30:7 married [11 41:13 helping [11 46:17 last [11 44:13 MPLIV 10 [11 7:12 helps [1] 48:13 insofar [11 30:10 Marty [z1 2:7 42:6 MPLIV20 [11 7:12 hereunto 8: 56:14 installation [11 30:3 Lastly [11 18:17 Matt [8] 12:2,10,11 13:14 instead [2] 43:23 44:1 law [1] 41:9 19:21 20:1,4 49:22 MS [87] 2:5 ,8,10,12 3:18 Hi [11 20:4 3:22,24 4:1,2,3,4,6,8,9,10 intended [11 11:22 lawn [1] 29:22 matter [1] 1:7 4:11,12 6:12,13,14,17,18 intentional [31 15:21 high [11 38:19 lawns [1] 23:17 maximum [1] 26:11 6:19,21,23 7:1,2,3,4,5,7 Hill [11 30:15 16:3,4 lawyer [11 9:7 may [14] 3:21 6:16 8:7 8:4,5,8,10,11,12,14,16,18 home [14] 7:12 9:9 10:15 interconnections [11 lead [11 48:17 11:19 21:14 25:5 29:22 8:19,20,21,22 35:17,19 24:5,7,13 25:20 28:14 33:19 35:6 38:8 41:12,13 44:18 36:1,7,18 37:6,13,18,21 least [11 20:20 38:10,16,20,23 39:4,18 38:11,12,13 41:6,11 47:17 53:5 54:10 homes [221 18:3,5,7,9 interested [21 11:21 legitimate [11 32:12 Mayor [3s1 2:2 3:2,20 40:12 41:1 ' 4 ' 17 42:1,4 24:12 25:18,22 26:13,16 Leslie [14] 2:4 4:4 6:21 4:14 5:21 6:2,6,9,15 7:9 43:18 44:10 45:5,6,11 2123 g 26:16,19 27:6 35:14 37:23 internally [1] 44:18 6:22 8:14,15 19:18 29:14 8 :6,24 9:17 10:3 19:19 49:20 50:1 53:9 54:7,8,11 38:21 39:14 40:8 42:13 introduce [1] 53:20 29:15 34:17 35:16 54:15 29:7,1331:235:1837:5 54:12,13,15,17,19,20,21 46:10 47:8,8,11 involvement[1] 28:7 54;16 42:6,24 43:17 45:22 54:22,23 55:1 homework [11 51:3 issue [6] 34:4 39:5 less [7] 17:7 26:18 42:15 49:17 51:5,7 52:18 53:11 Munns [10] 2:7 4:6,7 hope [31 11:4 33:1 34:17 40:11 47:9 52:16 42:16,17,19 50:20 53:18,23 54:4,9 55:3 54:17 18 '16,17 42:8 hopefully [2] 18:1 ,10 issues [21 35:21 44:15 letter [41 35:20,24 36:3 meadows [21 15:1 30:12 ' horse [1] 49:7 item [1] 30:1 53:4 mean [11 16:19 _ liability [11 10:5 means [11 42:17 - hour [11 1;9 items [31 11:9 15:12 30:9 License [11 56:21 N[21 2:1,14 Depo Court Reporting Service Index Page 3 Naperville, Illinois (630) 983 -0030 Yorkville City Council Multi-Page TM name - represent September 13, 2005 name [a] 9:6 29:18 49:21 45:6,9,10,11 47:12 51:9 per [s] 14:11 26:10,12 pretty [11 29:2 qualify [11 45:12 49:22 51:15 53:24 27:1,1 pricing [z] 24:5,11 quality [11 13:11 Naperville [i] 2:16 One - Family [11 7:17 percent [a] 28:2,1144:7 prides [1] 28:6 questions [17] 5:20,20 near [1] 45:9 ones [z] 37:20 40:22 46:22 primarily [i] 22:10 5:24 6:4 11:19 12:7 19:10 neat [3] 12:23,24 13:1 open [3] 20:21 35:7 40:16 Percentage [ 1] 46:22 29:4,6,9 37:7 50:10,11,23 P primary [z] 16:7 43:3 necessarily [z] 21:14 opened [z] 47:22 perfect [1] 22:16 private [1] 43:11 50:24 51:1 54:5 52:9 opinion [11 44:4 perfectly [i] 42:9 quick [11 15:8 P problem[i] 47:13 i need [a] 22:13 44:23 45:4 opportunity [z] 21:2 perhaps [z] 23:14 32:14 problems [11 39:20 q uickly [ ] 18:23 49:14 51:10 personal [1] 44:4 proceedings [a] 1:6 55:7 quite [3] 5:3 20:6 33:14 needs [8] 5:12,14 13:10 order [3] 24:18 25:7 41:15 personally [2] 21:15 56:9,13 53:18 7 :7 37:2 44:11 ordinance [s] 22:17 43:9 process [i] 11:4 -R _ i 25:21 39:22 40:2 53:14 petitioner [3] 3:12 7:21 pROCHASKA [3a] 2:2 R [z] 2:1,14 neighbor [l] 38:3 ordinances pi 22:18 8:3 neighborhood [3] 14:8 3:2,20 4:14 5:21 6:2,6,9 R -2 [z] 7:17 10:11 g organizes [11 23:13 petitioners [z] 3:6 7:13 6:15 7:9 8:6,24 9:17 19:19 R -3 [3] 7:18 10:17 11:6 ne e ig ig hbo oods [z] outside [2] 28:4 46:24 Phil [s] 12:3,12,13,15,18 29:7,13 31:2 35:18 37:5 42:6,24 43:17,19 45:22 R.P.R [i] 1:8 35:10 51:14 outstanding [z] 46:2,14 phone [3] 21:17 48:3,24 ranch [�] 18:3,7 25:18 hones [t] 48:5 49:17 51:5,7 52:18 53:11 new [3] 33:12 44:3 50:7 overall [1] 14:10 P 53:18,23 54:4,9 55:3 38:12,21,22,23 next [a] 3:2 7:10 25:13 own [z] 23:20 32:10 physical [1] 30:17 product [1 23:3 re p] 48:10 35:10 owned [2] 5:2 10:5 place [s] 21:4 28:23 44:6 products [i] 13:6 real [s] 3:13 7:22 15:8 nice [6] 15:23 16:20 18:11 ownership 11 10:4 50:18 51:1 28:24 52:7 18:15 42:19 45:24 45:13 P Plainfield [z] 37:11,14 Professionally [i] realize [z] 9:20 11:9 nig ht [3] 11:5 43:15 47:24 _ plan [15] 11:1,2,5 12:8 reap [zz] 18:8 19:6 g -p 13:20 14:4,13 15:8,9 profit [i] 29:23 20:14,18 21:4,5,8 22:8,13 noble [�] 30:24 p [3] 2:1,14,14 16:13 17:4 22:7 30:10 project [za] 12:21,22,23 24:9 28:5,16,22 32:23 none [2] 6:2 29:13 p.m [1] 1:9 31:23 52:17 13:1,7,14 14:17 15:2 16:1 33:17 35:14,15 39:4 42:2 normal [1] 19:15 p ackets [1] 14:15 p 16:10,17,22 17:1,5 19:17 46:5 47:4 pl ann ed [a] 7:16,20 P 16 25:15 29:10 12, normally [i] 32:15 10:17 11:22 20:12, reason [z] 18:18 22:15 paper [l] 35: 29:15 38:14 4819 49:6 2 : northwest [i] 7:23 parameters 2 32:20 Planner [1] 12:4 projections Eli 47:16 reasonable [a] 24:5,11 notes [i] 56:11 parcel [i] 30:4 planning [a] 12:4,19 projects [3] 13:4 15:10 24:11,14 nothing [11 28:22 13:5,19 19:16 reasons [a] 22:23 31:10 notice [z] 15:18 30:2 park [l] 47:12 P lans [z] 5:9 11:23 33:18 36:10 parking [io] 39:7,11,13 prop erties [i] 14:16 P now [is] 4:15 9:1,15 10:5 39:16,22,24 40:6,11 47:6 Plantings [1] 23:20 property [is] 3:13,16 5:3 receive [11 28:1 12:1 17:6 20:6 27:5 32:1 47 play [i] 13:13 5:6,18 7:22 9:11 10:4,7,8 received [ 3] 11:15 21:17 I 35:2 41:12 48:11 50:17 parks [z] 44:145:1 playing [z] 24:2,2 10:23 11:3,4,11,23 14:5 21:18 j 53:2155:4 leased [z] 45:15 51:13 25:1 52:14 receiving [1] 25:13 number [6] 27:6 30:1 parkways [i] 52:5 P 42:9 48:24 49:23 50:1 part [31 40:23 52:9,16 pleasing [1] 16:1 proportional [i] 27:23 recently [3] 11:15,16 numbers [i] 53:22 Part [11 27:13 pleasure [11 12:20 provide [4] 24:10,18 43:20 P articular U] 25:1 26:8 Pledge [11 3:1 28:16 34:2 recognized [z] 28:9,10 provided [l] 26:24 recognizes [�] 37:1 _ 29:10 31:7,16 33:16,16 plenty [i] 39:13 ( » -0 particularly [z] 34:14 plowed[i] 30:18 provides [z] 21:1 23:9 recommended [i] 11:2 oath [1] 56:5 44:15 plowing [a] 30:17 33:5 prudent [i] 5:8 record[l] 11:10 observation [1] 43:5 passed [11 53:6. 43:11,15 public [19] 3:3,4 4:15 reduce [11 40:4 obviously [z] 17:20 19:9 past [1] 21:7 plus [11 28:24 6:10 7:119:12,20 11:1,8 reduced [s] 18:5,18 off [3] 20:14,19 35:5 p ath [11 35:5 p oint [io] 26:12 27:12 11:18 22:12 29:4 3 6: 39:12,23 51:18 P P 43:13 54:6 55:4,6 56:9,13 reducing offer [i] 23:5 Paul [z] 2:3 45:22 29:17,19 49:5 51:14522 PUD [3] 10:20 22:16,17 g [ a ] 51:19,22 office [1] 49:13 pavement [i] 52:4 52:7,19 53:19 5 P pull [i] 15:8 reductions [i] 17:24 oftentimes [3] 33 pay L31 24:13 32:7 46:17 Police [1] 33:9 Pulte [6] 7:12 9:8 10:15 region [z] 32:3,17 52:11 paying [z] 32:9 40:22 Population [io] 25:20 12:3 20:5 22:2 g Ohare [zi] 2:8 3:18 4:8,9 26:1,20 27:4 29:22 30:19 regional [i] 32:2 6:14 7:1,2 8:4,18,19 35:17 payment [z] 24:14,15 31:12 42:15,17 44:16 purchase [3] 25:8 41:6 regular [11 25:22 35:19 36:1,7,18 45:6,11 Peak [11 27:11 populations [11 25:17 remain [11 28:20 50:154:8,19,20 pedestrian [11 18:20 portion [1o] 9:11 11:6 Purchasers [i] 9:10 remember [i] 29:17 old pi 41:18 people [60] 18:21 21:1 20:21 22:2 25:14 26:15 purpose [1] 7:11 21:16,18,19,22 22:13 23:6 31:8,9 43:7 purposes [11 16:8 reminds [i] 38:2 older [s] 21:1 25:9,19 reminiscent [i] 30:15 30:18 41:10 24:6,12 25:4,19,20,23 possible [11 24:18 pursuant [l] 11:1 26:12,21,22 27:6,10,12 removal [2] 23:18 30:19 on- street [3] 39:6,10,21 28:2,8,10,11,14,21 32:6 Possibly [z] 41:19 46:9 put [a] 23:3 46:16 48:13 repeat [i] 49:20 once [i] 19:6 33:8,13,17 34:11 premier [11 38:19 49:7 P one [30] 3:5 10:21 15:17 34:14,16,20 36:13 38:8 presence [i] 16:23 putting [3] 32:8 46:18 REPORT [i] 1:6 16:7 22:24 23:6,10 24:8 40:8,9,9,2141:12 42:2 presentation [3] 4:16 52:4 reported [1] 56:8 24:23 26:14 31:4,11,14 45:12,18,18,19 46:22 15:14 29:3 reporter [2] 9:19 56:6 33:18 37:13,15,16 39:11 47:24 48:5,14,2149:4,21 presently [z] 21:3,23 - Q - represent [1] 9:8 39:19 40:1 42:9 43:18 50:4,5,9 Depo Court Reporting Service Index Page 4 Naperville, Illinois (630) 983 -0030 I Yorkville City Council Multi-Page TM represents- up September 13, 2005 represents [i] 12:3 secondary pi 16:8 sneezes [11 38:3 12:18,18 19:21 52:1 tonight Es] 20:7 21:20 reputation [1l 13:.12 seconded [4l 3:21 6:16 snow [2] 23:17 30:19 stuff [i] 47:6 22:11,12 28:9 request [a] 3:7 7:13 8:7 54:10 snowplow [i] 43:8 subdivision [il 33:12 tonight's [il 11:7 23:14 40:4 Secondly [il 17:23 snowplowing [il 34:3 submitted [i] 11:10 TONY [il 2:11 requested [i] 39:12 security [il 33:22 someone [3] 9:141:13 suburban [il 14:7 too [s] 16:12 18:1 42:16 requesting [il 31:9 see [16] 14:18 15:19 16:5 41:15 such [2 28:7 44:5 43:16 45:10 requirement [i] 41:16 16:13,24 18:11 19:3 21:24 sometime [11 47:20 Suite [11 2;15 took [il 26:11 Reserve [il 33:14 30:6 35:13,14 45:14,24 sometimes [2] 21:7 top [2] 26:6,14 46:6 47:13 53:3 sums [il 19:8 Residence [2l 7:18,18 23:23 total [il 43:7 seeing [i] 30:5 Sun [3] 34:5 35:4 51:9 resident [il 41:17 sorry [zl 29:17 43:20 touch [il 19:9 seeking [a] 5:1610:8,9 Superintendent [il residential m 9:10 10:20 south [21 14:22 16:18 $2 : 20 tour [i] 34:18 10:12,20 14:24,24 21:9 selected [i] 45:16 southeast [11 14:6 support [4l 40:23 44:21 toured[2] 45:8,11 -. 30:4 sell [i] 24:12 space [i] 35:7 45:7 48:19 towards [z] 25:18 44:20 residents [4] 19:5 23:14 spaces [2i 39:15,15 supposed [il 41:10 townhomes [i] 22:5 28:20 51:11 senior [i] 43:22 residual [i] 27:22 seniors U] 23:15 40:15 speak [2i 8:3 9:1 surrounding [zl 15:5 Township [21 3:16 7:24 40:17 44:3,8,17 46:1 speakers [il 47:1 45:20 track [i] 15:20 resource [i] 47:2 Sears [3al 2:10 4:10,11 suspect [11 53:3 traditional [�l 20:20 Response [4l 6:1,5 29:12 sense [i] 35:7 P u P 6:12 7:3,4 8:5,20,2137:6 swear [1] 9:15 26:6,16 37:4 40:7 42;10 I 51:6 September [21 1:9 36:1 37:13,18,21 38:1016 20 50:14 I restricted z 43:22 53:3 serve 13 [2l 5:11, swearing 9: 9:21 ) [ l 38:23 39:4,18 40:12 41:1 sworn [zl 9:23 56:5 traffic [i] 18:23 i retail [3] 28:17 48:9,10 service [3l 7:19 30:3 43:2 41:4,17 42;1,4 43:18,20 transc i retire [il 24:10 services [3l 30:11 33:4 44:10 45:5 49:20 53:9 synergy [i] 47:3 [ 1 56:11 44.16 54:7,21,22 System [3] 46:11,13518 transitional [21 14:7 retired [21 27:11 45:13 set [s] 13:20 16:5 49:14 special [al 3:10 13:2 30:2 26 :9 rezone [2i 3:8 7:15 , _ transportation [i] .2 56:14 -T 31:23 J right [ill 10:5 12:1 31:4 setback [11 18:6 specific poi 13:10,20,24 32:1 35:2 36:7 48:11,16 16:10 17:21 29:5 30:1,7 T [il 2:1 travel [21 27:11 36:11 f 49:12 50:11,24 setbacks [2l 17:10 18:1 talks Ell 25:21 32:22 36:16 treatment [21 3:10 5:5 right -of -way [3] 18:18 seven [1] 13:4 specifically [6] 11:21 tap [3l 46:24 47:1,1 trouble [i] 49:9 52:5,11 several Ul 23:2 35:21 19:6 32:4 49:2,4 53:15 target [il 50:11 true [21 41:6 56:10 right -of -ways [8] 18:19 36:10,21 37:6 45:8 51:16 spend [zl 22:2 24:1 targeted [il 43:22 29:18 39:12,23,24 40:4 sewer [i] 5:12 P g try [�1 22;14 24:10,17 27:5 1 51:19 52:8 spring [il 47:20 tax [21 25:11 42:22 32:23 35:2 49:3 sharper [il 36:13 ss [i] 56:1 taxes [11 25:1 trying [6] 21:8 22:1,15 road [6l 1:10 5:10 15:19 sheet [i] 26:2 27:9 31:21,24 SSA [u] 30:8 31:2,6,9,14 templates [il 19:15 24:5 31:11 39:22 shop [11 28:13 32:2,18,21,23 33:1 43:10 turn [2] 12:10 19:22 roads [al 18:19,23 19:2,4 Shorewood [3l 37:17,18 terms [zsl 13:5 14:14 roadway [il 31:16 Staff [il 33:6 15:8 17:24 20:11,21 27:3 turning [11 36:6 Y 37:20 stage [i] 15:2 27:8,8,18 29:3 31:24 two [il] 3:3 9:13 26:24 roadways [11 27:15 shortchange [i] 34:11 32:13,21,22 33:3 34:9 30:9 39:14,14 47:9 roll [4] 3:21 6:16 8:7 standards [il 13:19 35:4 36:6,22 40:9 44:23 shorthand [3l 56:6,8,11 50:15 51:8 54:10 show [z] 27:2 35:11 standpoint [il 15:6 48:8 52:7,13 two -story [il 18:5 rolling [11 30:12 Start [2l 47:16,19 testified [41 4:23 9:4 ( shows [3l 14:5,6,16 type 16] 15:20 18:24 Rose [2] 2:10 37:5 side pi 39:11 40:1 started [i] 50:8 12:16 20:2 22:19 37:2 46:6 50:13 Route [21 7:24 31:18 sides [i] 15:13 h'P starting [il 38:17 testify [1] 21:17 lcal [2l 17:10 21:9 run [2] 17:19 52:12 sig nificant[3] 24:24 state [3l 29:24 56:1,6 testimony [3l 9:14 11:24 typically [il 27:11 31:18,20 statement [i] 49:19 12:8 _S_ states [i] 23:2 thank [al 6:6,8 9:6 19:17 similar [il 37:20 35:16 42:5 45:5 51:8 -U- S [z] 2:1,14 sing le-family [al 10:12 stories[ 50:15 15 22:5 25:2 straight [sl 5:1,15 19:3 themselves [� 52:6 under [al 25:5 41:5 43:2 safe [il 19:1 22-430-15 thoughts [i] 51:12 53:14 safer [i] 19:5 site [s] 13:5,18,20 15:9 thousand [2] 26:21 53:16 understand [al 22:14 32:10 street [61 39:11,17 40:1 29:21 30:12 31:22 sale [il 47:18 51:20,23 52:10 three [3l 10:5,9 26:12 sales [il 47:23 situation [11 43:10 understands [11 36:24 six z 13:3 35:12 streets [4] 18:8 30:16 through [13] 15:22,24 Sanitary [3l 3:6,15 5:23 [ l 33:20 52:6 16:2 18:10,12 21:6 27:3 unique [al 13:16 15:14 Saturday [i] 47:23 Size [21 37:20,24 streetscape [i] 18:20 29:16 30:13,23 37:23 46:5 19:13 22:3 sized [il 23:10 47:15 unit [41 7:16,20 10:18 says [zl 26:7 56:5 strictly [i] 44:1 g 26:12 school [s] 26:23 46:11 sizes [�l 17:9 18:1 21:7 strong [4l 13:14 15:15 thiou hOUt [al 16:6 46:13,18 47:3 29:18 37:8,9 39:5 17:5 28:16 18:15 21:9 22:21 United [61 1:2 2:17 3:7,9 schools [sl 25:2,2 42:19 slower [il 36:14 structure [il 52:23 tight [il 18:9 7:14,16 46:19 52:20 small [11 23:19 time- consuming [21 units [il 14:11 students [i] 46:18 SEC [21 12:4,19 smaller ui 17:7,9,9 37:7 43:8,12 Unless [il 36:15 39:5 23 52:6 studies [il 28:1 times [al 27:12 29:16 unlike [i] 20:17 Second [sl 3:19 6:13,14 study [21 25:12 28:1 36:22 51:17 8:5 54:8 Smith [il 12:6 up [141 13:20 15:8 16:5 Stuepfert [7] 12:4,12,15 tomorrow [2] 11:5 50:2 19:8 25:12 26:10 29:2 Depo Court Reporting Service Index Page 5 Naperville, Illinois (630) 983 -0030 Yorkville City Council Multi-Page TM usage - zoning September 13, 2005 35:4,21 45:9 47:17 49:1,4 witnesses [1] 9:13 50:5 Wolfer [9] 2:6 4:12,13 usage [z] 27:7,9 7:5,6 8:22,23 54:23,24 used [1] 22:21 word [1] 12:24 uses [1] 12:11 wording [1] 43:3 using [2] 13:19 27:15 worked [1] 44:11 usually [z] 39:9,13 works [4] 22:23 35:1 41:9 Utilities [z] 27:8 52:12 43:13 Utility [1] 52:12 worry [3] 23:17,22 49:15 wraps [1] 29:2 -V- written [1] 41:9 d VALERIE [1] 2:5 WYETH [6] 2:15,16 4:18 9:22 10:2 53:14 valid [1] 50:6 value [2] 24:4 31:12 - Y - variances [a] 13:23,24 , yard [s] 17:14,15,19 18:14 42:14 various [1] 40:17 d Yards [z] 23:19 39:1 village [z] 5:14 14:21 visit [1] 25:6 years [s] 22:24 35:12 41:18 50:17 53:2 visited [1] 51:8 yield [1] 19:20 vital [z] 21:2 44:15 Yorkville [32] 1:2 VITOSH [3] 1:8 56:4,20 2 :17 3:7,9 4:23 7:13,14 volunteering [z] 28:3 7:16 9:4 12:16 13:7 16:18 46:23 17:11 19:17 20:2,13,18 vote [1] 44:5 21:3 24:22 27:21 28:6 32:7 42:10,21,22 45:18 46:7 48:8,11 -w Yorkville - Bristol [z] wait [1] 44:4 3:6 waiting [3] 45:14,14 younger [1] 41:14 47:24 yourself [1] 22:22 walk [1] 35:19 walking [1] 18:22 -Z- WANDA [1] 2:8 zoned [1] 10:9 wanting [1] 17:7 zoning [13] 5:17 10:13 wants [2] 14:1 36:23 11:3 13:12 14:14,19,20 water [3] 3:10 15:13 14:22,23 15:6 22:4 26:9 16:20 Webb [31] 9:9 10:19 12:3 13:4 15:12 18:6 20:5,21 22:13,22,23 23:6,8 24:4 25:14 26:15,19 27:17 28:3 28:4,12,15,22 31:8,9 39:10 40:10 43:6 45:7 46:24 52:23 Webb's [1] 13:12 Wednesday [1] 47:24 week p] 25:13,14 44:14 west [3] 3:14 5:4 14:21 WHEREOF [1] 56:14 Whitehouse [1] 36:22 whole [6] 20:10 32:3,17 34:24 45:24 46:16 wide [1] 18:22 width [1] 51:20 widths [z] 18:18 51:23 within [s] 5:8 36:3,14 39:13 47:3 without [3] 25:2 46:18 49:10 WITNESS [1] 56:14 Depo Court Reporting Service Index Page 6 Naperville, Illinois (630) 983 -0030 E United City of Yorkville k Garritano Project September 13, 2005 r Age- Restricted Active Adult/Traditional Comparison � Del Webb Traditional i Acres 251 251 Gross Density 3.2 2.5 Total Number of Homes 811 628 Difference +183 Ave. # of People per Home 1.8 3.75 j Total Population 1460 2355 Difference +895 # of Children 0 854 Del Webb Traditional Acres 251 251 Gross Density 3.2 3.0 Total Number of Homes 811 753 Difference +58 Ave. # of People per Home 1.8 3.75 j Total Population 1460 2824 Difference +1364 j # of Children 0 1024 I i (PROJECT I APE.B • FER CONVENTIONAL. I ROADWAY CONNECTIONS 1 SITE 477 a; PRIMARY ANCE FOR ( PROVIDED TO ALIGN WITH SD' LANDSCTHE 1 31) Cam. , ° rj _ m ADJACENT APPROVED PLAT -- - _ . _ - r RO1EC n a - y .. 11 -, � y • . ..s.. <� . F \ �, .i '.-T ....,, L _ F n ."" ,� t F, eJ BASEL " -tNE RO L I ;_ �. j nE 15 14 4 I � � - 1."'�y t f."�LT"�'l.t'l "- gym" -.15{ li �y�z�,�.• ,� � .. r - r-i� r '� / ,� { j� '— - •x• JZ t— .OPPORTUNITY FOR ATTACHED po' �1J t , xr , _ q t . MODELS ACRD : ACR OSS LAKE - 1;, • ° °° SS FROM VIEW y .FROM � COMMUNITIES MODEL PARK ' °'r y _ - T „+ r' ROAD TERMINATES voRRV(uE 11AODEL;PARK'LOGATED ^• �' WITH VIEWS INTO ADJACENT TO AMENITY CENTER + , - AMENITY CENTER VICINITY MAP DRAWINGNT5 - °� �. "' ` ` OVERLOOKING •LAKE 1 i �IPPROXIMATE LOCATION OF "' p I 1 EXISTING 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN. `DRAMATIC VIEWS AT 6 1 , PROVIDE MINIMUM B' -70' BERM WITHIN TERMINUS OF ENTRY DRIVE j • l 1 I I LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG 'IL ROUTE. _d7. / / \ \ j C RiMARY COMMUNITY ENTRY, ' 13 \ WATER FEATURES PROVIDING CA OPEN VIEWS 8 PROVIDING LINK 50' LANDSCAPE BUFFER f -' • - l ��y43, - _ EXISTING aouEi a £. ° -. ! '•, \ rune T O GREEK V PRIMARY COMMUNITYI� 5 ALIG ITH' ROAD 11'CRQS ENTRY; a ss r ;t .y : OU 1 7 UTURE SI ^� FUTURE ROADWAY PER— - • ®�' ;— '' J� _ - CITY OF YORKVILLE • r / / ( ! ! ! ! I I I z ROADWAY PLAN LAND USE SUMMARY NET GROSS • ` 11` / ACTIVE ADULT ACRES UNITS DENSITY DENSITY %OFTOTALACRES ATTACHED 978 AC 244 UNITS 65 DUTAC 6.4 `b •rT`— CLASSIC' ?S AC. 37 UNITS 4.9 DUTAC 13.2 % PREMIER 51.8 AC 168 UNITS 3.7 DUTAC 6.8 `:b •' -- r +' I 1671 AC. 811 UNITS 4.8 DUTAC 284 % - COMMERCIAL 300 AC 5.1% ® - AMENITY CENTER 50 AL 0.9 % sw LANDSCAPE BUFFER ,. I OPEN SPACE 384 AC 6.6 % _ DEf[rlilON :9: AC ;0% f SECONDARY,ENTR!l / ROW 16.3 AC i8 % I SUBTOTAL 2860 AC 811 UNITS 4.8 DUTAC 2.8 DUTAC 488 m 5Q "BUFFER SEPARATION BETWEEN NET GROSS /. TRADITIONAL AND ACTIVE ADULT r `i + ANA it / CONVENTIONAL ACRES UNITS DENSITY DENSr Y '•�R NEIGHBORHOODS. r� A " CONVENTIONAL 2197 AC 481 UNITS _ DUTAC 3; 5 V. AC R4 UNITS .._ DUTAC 1• .. x t . ��,�'• :s ! + SCHOOLIMR 15- 2.6% TRAIL SYSTEM LINKING NEIGHBORHOODS _] OPEN SPACE :77 4 AC a? A TO LAKE ANDYAMENIITY CENTER (' " -. � DETENTION 290 Ac a9 t tr f Rovr' 82 AC 15 - I s . DRAMATIC VIEWS AT f SUBTOTAL 3031 AC 94 UNITS 2.2 DUTAC 1.6 DUTAC 512 % i �° �� TERMINUS, ,OF ENTRY DRIVE T _DRAMATIC VIEW OF TOTAL 566.; AC LM UNITS 33 DUTAC 22DU!AC 103.0 % / <,' y - 7l OPEN, SPACE AT NCLUDES ACREAGE AND UNITS FOR THE IMEL PARK '.! COM ENTRY " "ACREAGE INCLUDES 03 ACRES OF RIGHT OFNfAY ,-=t :SECONDARY ENTRY is r ;�te 400 B00 1640 IMMOMEMMw /I/ J Da Scale: V = 800' SEC Planning Consultants Y ORKVILLE PROJECT NORTH Date: August 19, 2005 Pldnn4l;; ° f andl dp• •1n 111h, 111 ' (',mww tI H mdmP I SHEET gLE Tt'" 44 iot lD403w}'.IEeeyadhles' lNmngaltEs bm,hal C.� rl P U LT E HOME Base mapping compiled from best available information. All map data YORKVILLE, ILLINOIS should be considered as preliminary. in need of verification, and subject to change. This land plan is conceptual in nature and does not represent any regulatory approval. Plan is subject to change.